HomeMy WebLinkAboutR-97-0283J-97-157
3/12/97
\ RESOLUTION NO. 9 7` 283
A RESOLUTION, WITH ATTACHMENTS, AUTHORIZING THE
CITY MANAGER TO SUBMIT AN APPLICATION, IN
SUBSTANTIALLY THE ATTACHED FORM, TO THE FLORIDA
INLAND NAVIGATION DISTRICT ("FIND") UNDER SAID
AGENCY'S WATERWAYS ASSISTANCE PROGRAM FOR
GRANT FUNDING IN THE ESTIMATED AMOUNT OF $100,000
FOR THE PEACOCK PARK SHORELINE EDUCATIONAL
ENHANCEMENT PROJECT; FURTHER AUTHORIZING THE
CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE NECESSARY
DOCUMENTS, IN A FORM ACCEPTABLE TO THE CITY
ATTORNEY, FOR THIS PURPOSE.
WHEREAS, the City of Miami is committed to the improvement of neighborhood
parks such as Peacock Park by their inclusion in its Capital Improvement Program (Capital
Improvement Project No. 331359, "Peacock Park Improvements"); and
WHEREAS, on September 8, 1994, Resolution No. 94-619, adopted by the City of
Miami Commission, accepted a grant in the amount of $100,000 from the State of Florida
Department of Environmental Protection under the Florida Recreation Development
Assistance Program (FRDAP) for improvements to Peacock Park including the construction
of a bay walk; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to cost estimates prepared during the design and permitting
phase, the proposed shoreline enhancements for Peacock Park necessitates additional
funding for construction; and
IATTACHMENT (S)I
CONTAINED
CITY COMMISSION
MEETING OF
APR 1 n 1997
Resolution No.
97- 283
WHEREAS, the Florida Legislature has made funding available to municipalities for
such projects under the Florida Inland Navigation District's ("FIND") Waterways Assistance
Program on a 50-50 cost share basis; and
WHEREAS, the proposed shoreline enhancements at Peacock Park located bt 2820
McFarlane Road in the Coconut Grove neighborhood, Miami, Florida, satisfies the criteria
for grant funding under the FIND program; and
WHEREAS, the City's matching share of the project cost, in the estimated amount
of $100,000 is available from the FRDAP grant and the newly adopted 1996 Safe
Neighborhood Park Bond Referendum;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
MIAMI, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The recitals and findings contained in the Preamble to this Resolution
are hereby adopted by reference thereto and incorporated herein as if fully set forth in this
Section.
Section 2. The City Manager is hereby authorized to submit an application, in
substantially the attached form, to the Florida Inland Navigation District ("FIND") for grant
funding under the FIND Waterways Assistance Program, in the estimated amount of
$100,000.00, for the Peacock Park Shoreline Educational Enhancement Project.
Section 3. The City Manager is hereby authorized' to execute the necessary
documents, in a form acceptable to the City Attorney, for application of said grant subject
to the following provisions:
a. The City will accept the terms and conditions set for in FIND Rule 16T-2 F.A.C.
' The herein authorization is further subject to compliance with all requirements that may be imposed by the City
Attorney, including but not limited to those prescribed by applicable City Charter and Code provisions.
2
97-- 283
b. The City is in complete accord with the grant proposal and will carry out the
project in the manner described in said proposal, and any plans and
specifications attached thereto, unless prior approval for any change has been
received from FIND.
c. The City has the ability and intention to finance its share of the cost of said
project from available grant/bond funds and the project site will be operated and
maintained at the expense of the City for public use.
d. The City will not discriminate against any person on the basis of race, color,
creed, national origin, sex or handicap in the use of any property or facility
acquired or developed pursuant to the grant proposal and will comply with the
terms and intent of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, P.L. 88-352 (1964)
and will design and construct accessibility by handicapped persons as well as
other federal state and local laws, rules and requirements.
e. The City will maintain adequate financial records on said project to substantiate
claims for reimbursement.
f. The City will make available to FIND, if requested, a post -audit of expenses
incurred on said project prior to or in conjunction with its request for the final
10% of the grant funding provided by FIND.
Section 4. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its
adoption.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this
AT
WALTE 0 MAN, CITY CLERIC
10 th day of A 97
7e*ROLLO, MAYOR
3
97 - 283
PREPARED AND APPROVED BY:
JULIE OPHELIA4RU
ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY
APPROVED AS TO FORM
AND CORRECTNESS:
A. Ql�i N J S, III
INY-
CITY ATTVEY
W 1504/JOB/kd/csk
11
97- 283
ATTACBAIENT K-1.
APPLICATION CHECKLIST
(To be completed by the Applicant)
This checklist and the other items listed below in items 1 through 12 constifute your
application.
The required information shall be submitted in the order listed.
Any additional information submitted by the applicant is subject to being removed from
the package by District staff prior to presentation to the District Board because of
reproduction and space considerations.
Two (2) copies of your application are required.
All information is required to be on 8 112" x 11" paper.
Maps and drawings may be on 8 1/2" x 14" paper and folded to 8 1/2" x 11" so that they
may be folded out after being hole punched and bound in a book.
0
1.
Application Reviewed by Local District Commi�si,
(District Commissioner must initial the yes line on this checklist
for the application to be accepted for processing).
2.
Assistance Application Form No. 90-22 ( 2 pages)
xx
(Form must be completed and signed)
3.
Project Evaluation and Rating Form No. 91-25
_x
(Form must be completed, no signatures. required)
4.
Project Cost'Estimate Form No. 90-25 (1 page)
x_
(Must be on District form)
5..
Official Resoludon.Form No. 90-11. (2 pages)
xx
(Resolution must be in District format and include items 1-6)
6.
Proof of Land Ownership
xx
(Must follow format of Form 'No. 94-26,
i,
legal descriptions alone are not acceptable)
7.
Project Timeline.
xx
8.
County Location Map
xx
97- 283
ATTACI:'LIVITNT E-1 Continued
APPLICATION CHECKLIST
(To be completed by the Applicant)
t.,
9. City Location Map (if applicable) xx
10. Project Boundary Map _ x
11. Site Development Map xx
12. Copies of all Required Permits x_
(Required of development projects only)
The undersigned, as applicant, acknowledges that Items 1 through 11 above constitutes a
complete application and that this information is due in the District office no later than June 2,
1997 or my application will be deemed incomplete at that time and removed from any Ru-ther
consideration by the District. I also acknowledge that the informationtin Item 12 is due to the
District no later than- August 1, 1997 unless a waiver is approy6d by the District Board
pursuant to s. 16T-2.008(d) F.A.C. If the information in Item 12 is not submitted to the
District office or a waiver is not approved. on august 2,. 1997 I am aware that my application
will be removed from any further consideration by the District.
APPLICANT'S A ON
Form No. 90-26
New 9/2/92, Revised 4/12/95,
Edward -Marquez
City Manager
97- 283
AlTACSIATF-, NT L-2
WATERWAYS ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
PROJECT APPLICATION
APPLICANT MFORMA.TION
pplicant: City of Miami Department of Parks and Recreation
roject Title: Peacock Park Shoreline Educational Enhancement Project
egislative District in which Project Site is Located:
State Senate: State House:
.aison Agent:. Fdwai-d Margnez
jdress: 444 S.W. 2nd Avenue, loth Floor
Miami, Florida Zip Code: 33130
.1ephone: _ (305) 416-1025 :
Lereby certify that the information provided in this application is true and accurate.
;nature: G jlG'` Date: -2 i-7
Edward Marquez, City Manager
.te Received:
eat. FIND Commissioner Approval:
. Required Supporting Documents:
olicant Eligibility:
ject Eligibility:
npliance with Rule 16T 2 F.A.C.:
;ibility of Project -Cost:
FIND OMCE USE
.. ,.T. 971 283
A7"IACHMENT U2
PROJECT INFORMATION
Total Project Cost: $ 200,000
FIND Assistance Requested: $ loo.000 50 % of total cost t'
Amount and Source of Applicants Matching Funds: Florida Department of Environmental Protection
Florida Recreation Development Assistance Program (FRDAP)
Ownership of Project Site (check one):
Own xxx Leased Other
If leased, please describe lessor term and conditions:
Project type (check one, or more of the followingprojectelements that are part of your project).
Public navigation channel dredging
Public navigation aids and markers
Public boat ramps and launching facilities
Public boat docking and mooring facilities
Public shoreline stabilization
Inlet management
Waterway signs and buoys for safety, regulation or information
Public spoil disposal site development
Waterways related environmental education programs and facilities
Public fishing and viewing piers -
Public waterfront boardwalks
Waterways. boating safety programs and equipment
Beach renourishment
Other waterway related projects
Permits Required:
Agency Yes No N/A Date Applied For Date Received
WMD
DEP
ACOE
COUNTY/CITY
Other
Form No. 90-22
N/A
— �--,-
YFS ^_
YES
YES,
N/A
3/97
3/97
3/97
97
6/97
_ (j 9 7
9'7-- 283
ATTACHMENT E-4
WATERWAYS ASSISTANCE. PROGRAM
APPLICATION EVALUATION AND RATING TORl'vI
The applicant is to complete this form by entering the project title, applicant name and
answers to the applicable questions.
All applicants will answer the first part of the form which includes questions 1 through
11.
Each applicant will then complete the questions in one attachment according to the
applicant's project type. The applicant should determine his project type (if the project
incorporates more than one project type) by detenining which project type is dominate
in terms of project cost.
The attachments that are not applicable to an applicant's project should not be included'in.
the submitted application.
APPLICATION TITLE: Peacock Park Shoreline Educational Enhancement Project
APPLICANT: city of Miami Department of Parks and Recreation
CATEGORY RATING EVALUATION CRITERIA
& RATING POINTS
POINTS
AVAILABLE
PRIORITY LIST
(1-5 paints) (1) Where does the project rank on this years
approved project priority list? (Applicant should
refer to Attachment C in the application to determine
project priority list ranking. The application may only
be of one type based upon the dominate cost of the
elements of the project.)
The Peacock Park Shoreline Educational Enhancement Project, (the "Project"), is
ranked 9 and 11 on the 1997-98 Waterways Assistance Program, Project Priority
list.
97- 283
WATERWAY
RELATIONSHIP
(1-3.5 points) (2) How does the project directly relate to District
waterways?
The Project's proposed boardwalk, educational signage, and removal of exotic
vegetation along the Peacock Park shoreline will provide the public increase
use, visual access, awareness and enjoyment of natural resources such as
Biscayne Bay and the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway.
(1-3.5 points) (3) Does the project benefit public navigation?
Yes, the Project does benefit public navigation because it stabilizes the
existing shoreline.
PUBLIC USAGE
& BENEFIT
(1-3 points) (4) Is the public usage of this project clearly
quantified?
Yes, the public use of the Project is clearly quantifiable because it is located in
one of the most heavily used parks of the Coconut Grove neighborhood in -Miami,
Florida. Coconut Grove is a dynamic, picturesque, cosmopolitan city -village where
numerous visitors and residents enjoy a variety of art galleries, theaters, .
restaurants, sidewalk cafes, boutiques and unique festivals such as the "Goombay"
and the "Coconut Grove Art -Festival", drawing over one (1) million visitors.
(1-4.5 points) (5) Can the project be reasonably used by residents
from other counties of the District?
Yes, the Project can be well used by local residents, visitors from other
counties and -tourists alike in this already famous neighborhood who -will be
drawn to the enhance visual access of Biscayne Bay and the looped boardwalk,
seating area and observation deck along the Peacock par]: shoreline.
97 - 283
TIMELINESS
(1-5 points) (6) Has the applicant presented a reasonable
timeline for the completion of the projectT
Yes, all environmental permit applications have been submitted as of the date
of this applichtion. Permits will be issued by August 1997. Project
construction drawings and specifications will be completed within 3 months of
grant agreement execution. Construction bidding and award of construction
contract will follow in the next 3 months. Construction will be completed
in 6 to 8 months.
COST-
EFFECTIVENESS
(1-2.5 paints) (7) Does the project provide a reasonable public
service for the money requested?
Yes, the Project provides a unique public service in this popular municipal
Park in the following manner: it creates a recreational, and educational
ammenity along the Biscayne Bay shoreline; it increases the visual access to
the Bay by the removal of exotic plant species and aids the preservation of
existing mangroves; and it increases park security by encouraging increased
pedestrian traffic through a portion of the site which is currently
underutilized.
(1-2.5 paints) (9) To what degree does the project demonstrate
cost sharing or funding from other sources?
The Project's costs are shared 50-50 by the City of Miami which has obtained
additional funding from the Florida Recreational Development Assistance
Program (FRDAP).
VIABILITY
(1-2 points) (9) To what extent does the project duplicate
existing efforts?
The Project does not duplicate existing efforts for this area because there
are no other projects -of this nature proposed by the City or other govenmental
agency.
97— 283
(1-2 points) (10) How will the project continue to be maintained
after District funding ceases?
2_
The maintenance of the Project will not rely on District funding as there is an
existent maintenance program and budget for Peacock Park, as a municipal property.
(1-3.5 points) (11) Will the program result in significant and
lasting benefits?
Yes, the Project will result in significant and lasting benefits for the
Biscayne Bay shoreline at Peacock Park by increasing visual access to the Bay,
improving the natural environment by removing exotic vegetation and assisting
in the preservation of mangroves, creating a recreational and educational
ammenity along the shoreline and encouraging pedestrian traffic in an area of
the park which is currently underutilized.
FIND FORM NO. 91-25
.Rev. -
97- 283
ATTACIIMENT E-4A
WATERWAYS ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
APPLICATION EVALUATION AND RATING FORM "
DEVELOPMENT & CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
THIS ATTACHMENT IS TO BE COMPLETED IF YOUR PROJECT IS A.
DEVELOPMENT OR CONSTRUCTION PROJECT BUT IS NOT AN INLET
MANAGEMENT OF BEACH RENOURISHMENT PROJECT.
CATEGORY RATING EVALUATION CRITERIA
& RATING POINTS
POINTS
AVAILABLE
(1-2.5 points) (12) Have all permits been applied for? If so,.when?
(If the project is a Phase I project a minimum score of 2
points will be awarded)
Yes, all permits have been applied for in' March,=1997.
(1-25 points) (13) Has the project received all of the required
permits? (If the project is a Phase I project a minimum
.score of 2 points will be awarded)
Yes. all permits will be obtained and a copy will be submitted prior to the
District's deadline.
97- 283
(1-1.5 points) (14) Has the design work been completed?
(A Phase I project will be evaluated based upon the
design work completed to date.)
e c:
Yes. The Project's final design phase consisting of. the preparation of
construction drawings and specifications will be completed within 3 months of
grant agreement execution.
(1-2.5 points) (15) Are the construction materials of lasting
quality?
Yes. All construction materials associated with the Project will be specified
to be of high quality and durability.
(1-2.5 points) (16) Are the construction techniques appropriate for
the project site?
Yes. All mobilization and construction operations associated with the Project
will be conducted from upland areas. In addition, during the driving of
concrete piles, several' measures will be taken to control turbidity and
maintain water quality in-th-e project area such as the use of turbidity
screens when appropriate.
RATING
POM
TOTAL
(Note: The maximum score possible is 50 points and the minimum score possible is 16
points. A score of 35 points is required to be considered for funding.)
I Form No. 91-25A
Rev
i
97- 283
ATTACHMENT E-5
FLORIDA INLAND NAVIGATION DISTRICT
WATERWAYS ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
PROJECT COST ESTIMATE
20JECT TITLE: The Peacock Park Shoreline Educational Enhancement Project
'PLICANT: City of Miami Department of Parks and Recreation
oject Elements Quantity Estimated Cost
(Number and/or Footage)
Applicant's Cost
FIND Cost
instruction:
Site Preparation: clearing, grubbing,
$30,000
$15,000
$15,000
)bilization, etc.
Boardwalk and Observation Deck: pilings,
$149,500
$74,750
$74,750
driving (2416 s.f.), decking (3114 s.f.), benches,
.sh receptacles, etc.
Landscaping: exotic tree removal, relocating
$17,000
$8,500
$8,500
trees (approximately 40), and planting of 50 trees.
t
4
Educational Signs
$1,500
$750
$750
Project Sign
$2,000
_ $1,000
$1,000
)TAL
$200,000
$100,000
$100,000
Form No. 90-25 9 7- 283
New 10t14192
ATTORNEYS CERTIFICATION OF TITLE
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY
444 S.W. 2nd Avenue
Suite 945
Miami, Florida 33130
March 17, 1997
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
:=
I, ANTONIO J. SOTO, III, am the Attorney for the City of Miami,
Florida. I hereby state that I have examined a copy of a deed from
ADIV Holding Company to the City of Miami dated March 30, 1935
conveying the following described property:
21 54 41 9.40 AC M/L
Coconut Grove Bayfront Park
Section One, PB 82-85
Tract A
(See attached Exhibit "All)
e
I have also examined a document showing that this property is
listed on the tax rolls belonging to the City of Miami. Finally,.
I have also examined a plat indicating that this property is owned
by the City of Miami.
This property is what is now called "Coconut Grove Bayfront Park."
I certify that the City of Miami does in fact own this property for
public recreational purposes based upon the documents that I have
examined.
Very truly yours,
97-- 283
OPINION OF TITLE
TO: THE CITY OF MIAMI, a municipal corporation
With the understanding that this Opinion of Title is furnithed
to Dade County, Florida, as an inducement for its acceptance of a
Declaration of Restrictions covering the property hereinafter
described, it is hereby certified that, in connection with Parcel
A (as hereinafter defined), we have examined Attorneys' Title
Information Data System computer title updates covering the period
from November 15, 1976 through March 17, 1997, at 11:00 p.m.;
(referred to as the "Title Information"), which Title Information
covers the period from the BEGINNING to March 17, 1997, at 11:00
p.m., inclusive, of the following described real property (the
"Property"):
Parcel A:
21 54 41 9.40 AC M/L
Coconut Grove Bayfront Park
Section One, PB 82-85
Tract A
(See attached Exhibit "A")
Basing our opinion solely upon the Title Information,we are of
the opinion that on the last mentioned date, the fee simple title
to the Property was vested in: City of Miami,,, subject to the
following encumbrances, liens and other exceptions:
A. Recorded Mortgages: None
B. Recorded Construction Liens, Contract Liens and Judgments:
None
C. General Exceptions:
None
(1) All taxes and assessments for the year in which this
opinion is rendered and thereafter.
(2) Rights of persons in possession other than the above
owner.
' (3) Facts that would be disclosed upon accurate survey of the
Property.
i
97- 283
(4) Any unrecorded labor, mechanics' or construction liens.
(5) Zoning and other restrictions imposed by governmental
authority.
(6) Any adverse claim to any portion of said land which -has
been created by artificial means or has accreted to any such
portion so created.
(7) Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing
liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or
assessments on real property or by the public records.
(8) Any adverse ownership claim by the State of Florida by
right of sovereignty to any portion of the Property, including
submerged, filled and artificially exposed lands and lands accreted
to such lands.
D. Special Exceptions:
(1) Plat of Coconut Grove Bayfront Park Section 1, recorded
in Plat Book 82, at Page 85, of the Public Records of Dade County,
Florida.
We hereby certify that we have reviewed all the aforementioned
encumbrances and exceptions. Therefore, it is our opinion that the
following party must join in the agreement in order to make the
agreement a valid and binding covenant on the lands described
herein:
e
NAME INSTRUMENT SPECIAL EXCEPTION NUMBER
The undersigned further certifies that he is an attorney at
law, duly admitted to practice in the State of Florida, and a
member in good -standing of the Florida Bar.
Respectfully submitted this 17th day of March, 1997.
ANTONIO J. SOTO, III,
8500 West Flagler St.
Ste. A-105
Miami, Florida 33144
j (305) 227-2700
ESQ.
Aa to r • Soi •
302163
97- 283
STATE OF FLORIDA )
SS.
COUNTY OF DADE )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this /;�7
day of March , 1997, by ANTONIO J. SOTO, III, ESQ. , whU is
personally known to me to be the same person herein described and
who produced a Driver's License as identification and who did take
an oath.
WITNESS my hand-.�Lnd official seal in the County and State last
aforesaid this day of March , 1997.
gNAGRQORVGUi 1
_. M� AUG-
VA 8 �405
e
fr'��aFa�
Commission Expiration No.:_
97- 283
t'j(e0'n--Azff.- M.),tbg
F1:MiJBPF "A"
'xbi ion, -or ,.=q
1P
"-
=4
�aq,,�oq wy#xp!
M".
n
'Mre 'y
5.•1'
- _M 4IrIz Ir 39 .. . , ""' , ; T� I-
dp d. pqa*4 7
't -41� ,
ur- ana; -,00
the-:,= fit ar A,
tizoh
U r:;th v,
WL F
qb
Wit
;L
4 kj�
most westaily -rzorAdr o tr&at-of Land. =A
Hopkins Lot" take: Placid School";
Thence sot�t4eoLsterly along the southweaterly line -of agid.
tract of 1=4 mar)ca& "John k. Hopkins Lot, TA'1 e Placid
' L
a. '
Sdhool" diet_=ep -of. 335." feet, more or laosi to 4� psi nt
Thence with a deflection anglo of 6102VIG" to the leO =4
easterly a d4ste4ae-of 471*51 feet * ' more or leas, to Sk point
of intersection with a line parallel to and 65400 rent
southwesterly from the northeasterly line of said tract of
land marked. "John, M. Hopkina Lot, Lake Placid School";
APPROVE As 7 DESCRIPTION
IV _ . _, 9 7 2 8 3
ab, n n
m
41
-,�W'M, V pg -e of
4 QQreq t%-,-GqtLtIxw� art brix.-
In of a
x . Aid'
. 'A 21 a
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . t.
;4
Y
mbr Rftth
opus; Lake':k:aoSa= Aq.,H.ib
I 6:,: St p.115 f
zp U•.
o
ariRe of
0'.' or 10,
Eas
ttp:N angle of 61029 frop
AG* X=
a-arele. of. 14PI.A.4,1:f !.., — - ..
o:C.- 4P A U
or
.4:gf A Q0'Fe to the A` h4LV
angle .f--4zo 4iiatanae
�7. tees,M,qr.q -0.leas, to a point of or
.rer $a Cur1rof
7", W
:-OL the rIght,b4T# r4ditv
WO of curve to
-t '01
-A'6 r angle f 590t&
m e o
of e1j.35 feetj. lore or lesaj to a point of tpagent;
Thenae southeasteily along a line which is tangent to the
last Aboie described curve a distaaaa of 18,00 feet, moral
or leant to a point of curve;
Thence among the amo of A tangential curve I;Q the left having
ral angle of 124QpA.*35tt'&
A raditw or 9.3:00 -feet ' and a central
distance of 201.94 feet, more or less, to a point of tangent;
Thenoe* northeasterly along a line which is tangent to the last
Above described curve a distance of 59;50 feet, more or less,
to a point of curve;
APPROVED 'AS T IDMCRIPTION
83
BOOK
'NI
P Wm 71,1giNq
. . . .......
E15
rv4
PA
T44q 0
iQ
'Lee -ap pliel to
pr
x
kYLakci
0
kY eke . 7 CU.!
MW-lI"A,Z• w 4
W
5G
Vie:
t
49' th� f
n'p
66 1 QF.IeP9j7.!
o =k
56i
Thaw®. Irri
h 4L da
point I
A. rl
)3e,31fiP9mi' _At .the j)qii# on -�a 1J ne.. p4r.4161
vo!qtheorterly pro'd
ag oot4 1j" trod of laiia mpxke4 "- Ohn no xi
c4o andfm by the i
Lot, Lak� Pjaoid`� ol" a. MAP t Ai the ..T
Hop K=i;..LAXO i.Plaeiet, Zch r xd�A` I.
.Qol Property As P14- Book
6.. at tb Me lie r000rds. of Dade wCoitnt Fjor �dA,
A a t* 9* th e.,- - qq Ixt UT d a t I$ jpro f
line -b.1irallej to vaia. 50i0o Ce at sowtihe aiej f idme tha appth
easterly 14xe of Bqainesa Street (now called South Bay -shore
3*iye) as designated. on the plat showing the property oi
Sophie Ho Klo0er- as tocarded in -Plat Book 4, at page 142j�*r
the Pablio Records of Dade County, Florida; -
'--Thence southeasterly along said line parallel to and 6500.feet'
aotLthwesterly from the southeasterly produttou-.of the north—
easterly line of sa4d tract of land. marked ".Tohn Y. Hgpkirla
Lot, Lake Plaoid School" a distance of 241i,72 feot, more or
less, to a point;
APPROVED AS TO DESCRIMON
..................
DIRECTOR OF
M
ATTACHMENT E-8
WATERWAYS ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
PROJECT TIME LINE
The applicant is to present a detailed timeline on the accomplishment of the components
of the proposed project including completion dates, as applicable, for; permitting, design,
bidding, applicant approvals, initiation of construction and completion of construction.
Peacock Park Shoreline Educational Enhancement Project
Task 1. Obtain Environmental Permits
March 1997 - June 1997
Task 2. Develop Construction Contract Specifications and Drawings
Execution of FIND/City of Miami Contract - December 1997
Task 3. Contractor Selection Process
December 1997 - May 1998
Task 4. Construction Contract
June 1998 - September 1998
FIND Form 96-10
91- 283
(Township: 54
Range: 41
Source: U.S.G.S
'I I
Peacock Park Boardwalk
ii
City of Miami, Florida
0 f
28.3
mange: 4.1 W 16
8E RMELL0•A.
F. PARTNER:
00
cq
PEACOCK
PARK
CITY OF MIA6
:xr n,v
m. xo. �evaxa D.:.:
PEACOCK PAI
GRANT
SCHEMATIC
BISCAYNE BAY
20'
TYPICAL BENCH (6') JETTY '
A B SEATING AREA
OVERLOOK uc '
BOARDWALK
co
t jl
DN1' RAM DN
RAMP
`,
MEAN HIGH WATER
203' 10
EXISTING I EXISTING EXISTING EXISTING
CONCRETE CONCRETE CONCRETE CONCRETE
FOUNDATIO FOUNDATION FOUNDATION FOUNDATION
19 EXISTING SHORELINE 58'
OPENING EXISTING SHORELINE
PARK UPLAND OPENING'
0 l'O ; 20
GRAPHICSCALE
PEACOCK PARK BOARDWALK SHEET 1
MIAMI,FLORIDA
BERMELLO-AJAMIL PLAN VIEW ^'' DATUI
& PARTNERS-INC FEBRUAl
Archlleclura Engineering P..lanning „
Interior Design land3cape kewteclure
m
00.
-- --
CIA
14'
12'
10'
8'
6'
4'
2'
0'
2'
- 4'
- 6'
8'
-10'
PEACOCK PARK BOARDWALK
MIAMI,FLORIDA
BERMELLO •AJAMIL
& PARTNERS-INC
i ArcWteclure Ea6lneering Plannln;
lnlerlor Dolsn Laad3cape Archlleelun
SECTION "All
AST
E
)XIMATE
BOTTOM
SHEET 2 0F, 5:
DATUM NGVD
FEBRUARY 1997
14'
12'
10'
8'
6'
4'
2'
0'
2'
4'
6'
x 8" PRECAST
;ONCRETE .PILE' (TYP
APPROXIMATE
BAY BOTTOM
8' 10,
^T�
_ 10'
0' 5' ••
ACOCK PARK BOARDWALK SHEET 3 OF
IAI,FLORIDA
BERMELLO AJAMIL SECTION "Brr DATUM NG
' & PARTNERS;•INC — FEBRUARY fez
Architecture Engineering ?Ihnning
Interior Design lAzdseape Architecture
I
1 A' nVFRI nnK
12'
10,
8'
6'
4'
2'
0'
2'
4'
- 6'
8'
-10'
r
PEACOCK PARK BOARDWALK
MIAMI,FLORIDA
BERMELLO eAJAMIL
& PARTNERS • INC
' Architecture Engineering Planning
Interior Design tend3cepe Ar6lleclure
SECTION licit
x 8" PRECA
;ONCRETE'" PILE
APPROXIMATE
BAY BOTTOM
SHE"E,T
�~ DA
FtHi
FRS -46
W Y i i
i V
V
i W
W V V W
J V
i V i
Y V
V
W W V
•i
V V
V
♦, V
V W
i V
V
J
V y V
i i
W
V V
•I• W
W v V y ♦
V
V W
W
W ♦ ♦ V
V W V
V ♦ W
V W
W
V W
♦ W
V V
V
I V V
W
V V
V
W W
W, W
V• W
V
V
W W
V W W
W♦
V W
W
i Y
♦ W V V
W V
V W V
W V
W
W W V
V
• V
V
W.
W W
W V
W V
V
V
V V W
.'C •
W
V W
'�' W
♦ v W W
V
V W
W
W W W V
W W W
V ♦ W
W W
W
W W
W ♦
V V
V
W V
V
W V
W
V
W W V W
W V
V
W W
W v V V
V W
W V W
V V
V
W W Y
♦
W V
V
W' W
W W
V V
V
V
W W W
V•
W
W V
W W
v W W y W
i
W W
V
W W
y V W i
i J
i
V i
i ♦ V J
V W
W Y W
BISCAYNE
i W
BAY +'
i V i
W
i ♦
W
♦ V
i b
V V
V
b
W
i W
W V
W W
W V
V
W i i
W V
W i
y V
V
W
V
V
i W
W
W
V W
W V W
y• , W
..!•
W
W
i
i V
i W
y W
,i
W W i,
y y i y y
J
V V
W V V
V y i
J W
J
V i
i y
V V
V
•I4 W
y
i i
W
W W
W W
i' W
W
i
Y W
W
.y
y V W W
J
J W
y I W i
i V
V
W W i
V
V i
b
Y Y
W W
W W
W
V
W W ♦
W
V
W J
W W
W W
W
W
W
i V
b
y• W
W W
i W
W
W V
V
i W
i
JETTY ♦
i W W V
W.
V V
,W,
W
V
J W
b
•(• W
W ' y
� •L �
`�
y `i•
W
V
V W
i
Vf W
W ti
W i
W
W
W V V
V
W W
W V
W, W
PROkSED,
b
W
W
W
W
J J
W W
•0
educational sign (tW)
O
seolareo
W
W
R
JECT
J
W
seating
y
W
oreo
4.
WOOD BOARDWALK
EXISTING
EXISTINGl
MANGROVE/1
MAH0E.---
4-EXISTING
MANGROVE/
MAKE
OE
MEAN HIGH WATER
1 'EXISTING I EXISTING EXISTING
CONCRETE CONCRETE CONCRETE
���� FOUNDATION FOUNDATION FOUNDATION
,EGEND PARK UPLAND
MODERATELY. DENSE SEAGRASS (APPROXIMATE LOCATION)
v v •
y W SPARSE SEAGRASS (APPROXIMATE LOCATION)
I•
EXISTING
CONCRETE
FOUNDATION
BARREN SOFT BOTTOM NOTE; BIOLOGICAL DATA
PROVIDED BY DERM
PEACOCK PARK BOARDWALK
MIAMI,FLORIDA
BERMELLO -AJAMIL
' &• PARTNERS -,INC
Archll�clur� [ngln��rin9 �lanninp
Inlulor prrlgn londuop� N<hll'ulur�
ENVIRONMENTAL FEATURES
0' 10. 20 '40
GRAPHIC SCALE
SHEET-5 OF 5
i DATUM NGVD
'FEBRUARY 190
CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA 9
INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO : Honorable Mayor and Members DATE MAR ( 0 1997 FILE
of the City Commission
SUBJECT : FIND Grant Application
/Peacock Park
FROA4jj_� Ed d Marquez REFERENCES
V/(City Manager ENCLOSURES:
RECOMMENDATION
It is respectfully recommended that the City Commission adopt the attached Resolution
authorizing the City Manager to submit an application to the Florida Inland Navigation District
("FIND") under said agency's Waterways Assistance Program for grant funding in the estimated
amount of $100,000 for the Peacock Park Shoreline Enhancement Project. The Resolution
further authorizes the City Manager to execute the necessary documents, in a form acceptable to
the City Attorney, for this purpose.
BACKGROUND
The City of Miami Department of Parks and Recreation working with residents, community
associations, the N.E.T. office and the Chamber of Commerce of the Coconut Grove
neighborhood have developed throughout the years a commitment to the needs of the area
including the preservation and improvement of Peacock Park as an important focal point for
passive recreation and major community events.
The City of Miami Capital Improvement Program (Project No. 331359) includes Peacock Park
as a recipient of funds from the 1972 Park and Recreation General Obligation Bond, the State of
Florida Recreation Development Assistance Program (FRDAP) and the just recently voter
approved Safe Neighborhood Parks Bond Referendum. A portion of these funds have been used
to fund major improvements such as site lighting, recreation building renovations, ball field
relocation, new playground, site furnishings and landscaping. Remaining grant funds and a
portion of future bonds funds, if necessary, will be used to fund the construction of a pedestrian
bay walk, enhance the shoreline, provide visual access to Biscayne Bay and increase passive
recreational opportunities.
Pursuant to cost estimates prepared during the design and permitting phase of the bay walk and
shoreline enhancement at Peacock Park, the project necessitates additional funding for
construction in an estimated amount of $100,000. The Florida Legislature has made funding
available to municipalities for such projects under the FIND Waterways Assistance Program on a
50-50 cost share basis. The proposed shoreline enhancement project at Peacock Park satisfies
the criteria for grant funding under the FIND program, and the City's required matching share is
available from the above mentioned FRDAP grant and if necessary, the recently approved 1996
Safe Neighborhood Park Bond Referendum." ' '
I.o. 97— 283