HomeMy WebLinkAboutR-98-0937J-98-962
9/21/98
RESOLUTION NO. 9 8 + 7
A RESOLUTION, WITH ATTACHMENTS, AMENDING A
PREVIOUSLY APPROVED DEVELOPMENT ORDER
(RESOLUTION NO. 79-396, ADOPTED MAY 24, 1979,
AS AMENDED BY RESOLUTION NOS. 80-707, 86-828,
AND 90-911, ALL ATTACHED), FOR THE BALL POINT
PROJECT, LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY 100 CHOPIN
PLAZA AND APPROXIMATELY 201-399 S. BISCAYNE
BOULEVARD, A DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT,
PURSUANT TO SECTION 380.06, FLORIDA STATUTES,
BY AMENDING THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER TO REMOVE
THE SOUTHERN APPROXIMATELY 3.01 ACRES;
FINDING THAT SAID CHANGES DO NOT CONSTITUTE A
SUBSTANTIAL DEVIATION; MAKING ADDITIONAL
FINDINGS; INSTRUCTING TRANSMITTAL OF COPIES
OF THIS RESOLUTION TO AFFECTED AGENCIES; AND
PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 79-396, adopted May 24,
1979, as amended by Resolution Nos. 80-707, 86-828 and 90-911,
the City Commission issued a Development Order for a Development
of Regional Impact, pursuant to Chapter 380, Florida Statutes,
for the Ball Point Project located at approximately 100 Chopin
Plaza and approximately 201-399 S. Biscayne Boulevard, Miami,
Florida, ("Project"); and
WHEREAS, this Project was originally approved under prior
Zoning Ordinance No. 6871, and continues in that status; and
WHEREAS, Lucia Dougherty, authorized representative of Miami
Center Joint Venture, owner, and Miami One Centre, Inc., contract
ATTACHMENT (5jl
LOItiA1NED
CWr
MOO=(; OF
SEP 2 8 1998
98- 937
purchaser, (collectively referred to as the "Applicants"), now
desire to amend the Development Order to remove the southern
approximately 3.01 acres of land from the said Development Order;
and
WHEREAS, on August 12, 1998, the Applicants filed a
Notification of Proposed Change to a Previously Approved
Development of Regional Impact (DRI) pursuant to Subsection
380.06(19), Florida Statutes (1995), with the Florida Department
of Community Affairs, the South Florida Regional Planning
Council, and the City of Miami; and
WHEREAS, the proposed amendment does not constitute a
substantial deviation pursuant to Section 380.06 (19) (e) (2) ,
Florida Statutes (1995), and, thus is not subject to a
substantial deviation hearing or determination by the City of
Miami; and
WHEREAS, the State of Florida Department of Community
Affairs has provided the City of Miami with a letter stating it
has no objection to the proposed amendment; and
WHEREAS, the Miami Planning Advisory Board, at its meeting
of September 16, 1998, Item No. , following an advertised
hearing, adopted Resolution NO. PAB 98- by a vote of
to ( ), RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of amending the Development
Order of the Ball Point Project, as hereinafter set forth; and
WHEREAS, the City Commission after careful consideration of
this matter deems it advisable and in the best interest of the
98- 937
general welfare of the City of Miami and its inhabitants to amend
said Development Order as hereinafter set forth;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF MIAMI, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The recitals and findings contained in the
Preamble to this Resolution pertaining to substantial deviation
as Conclusions of Law are hereby adopted by reference thereto and
incorporated herein as if fully set forth in this Section.
Section 2. Resolution No. 79-396, adopted on May 24,
1979, as amended by Resolution Nos. 80-707, 86-828, and 90-911,
for the Ball Point Project, attached hereto as a part of
Composite Exhibit "A" of this Resolution, is hereby amended as
follows:1/
"Legal Description:
• • • ■ 4
Q • / • •
offal ma.
• RTRNM-1 PER
'
Z • + •
Words and/or figures stricken through shall be deleted. Underscored
words and/or figures shall be added. The remaining provisions are now in
effect and remain unchanged. Asterisks indicate omitted and unchanged
material.
� 9 937
IN III!
.• • •
••-•
•-• - I •
• • • vNil.r -
•
-19MMMKIMMMUE
•
• • - • • • -
•- r•
• • •-•
• •-Will!• ••_
•- . •
--
•-• - I
IN •
Section 3. Resolution No. 86-828, adopted on
October 7, 1986, which amended Resolution No. 79-396 for the
Ball Point Project, attached hereto as part of Composite
Exhibit "A" of this Resolution, hereby amends Sections 5 and
6 as follows:1/
■
_ANNIM
•
•
-
■
• •
•
■ 0001
MHA
IN
98- 937
Section 4. Resolution No. 90-911 adopted on November 8,
1990, which amended Resolution No. 79-396 for the Ball Point
Project, attached hereto as part of Composite Exhibit "A" of this
Resolution, hereby amends Section 29 as follows:I/
ON
1111 M.
■ - - - - - -
t7hi.q nPvP'LQ=enf Order cnntinues to run with the land
Section 5. It is hereby found that the changes, as
proposed:
a) do not unreasonably interfere with the achievement of the
objectives of state land
development guidelines,
9S-- 937
regulations or plans applicable to the City of Miami; and
b) are consistent with local subdivision and platting
requirements; and
c) are consistent with the Report and Recommendations of the
South Florida Regional Planning Council; and
d) as a result of the aforementioned, does not constitute a
substantial deviation pursuant to Section 380.06(19) Fla.
Stat. (1995).
Section 6. It is hereby further found that, pursuant to
Section 380.06 (19) (e) 2, Fla. Stat. (1995) , the herein changes to
the subject Development Order is not subject to the public
hearing requirements of Section 380.06(19)(f)3, Fla. Stat.
(1995), or to a determination pursuant to Section 380.06(19)(f)5,
Fla. Stat. (1995).
Section 7. Upon full execution, copies of this
Resolution and its attachments shall be transmitted by the City
Manager or his designee to: Lucia A. Dougherty, Esq., 1221
Brickell Avenue, Miami, Florida 33131, as authorized agent for
the Applicants; Carolyn Dekle, Executive Director, South Florida
Regional Planning Council, 3440 Hollywood Boulevard, Suite 140,
Hollywood, Florida, 33021; and James F. Murley, Secretary, State
of Florida Department of Community Affairs, Division of Resource
-6- 9Q_ 937
Planning and Management, 2740 Centerview Drive, Tallahassee,
Florida, 32399.
Section 8. This Resolution shall become effective forty-
six (46) days from the date of adoption s/.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 28th day of September , 1998.
JOE CAROLLO, MAYOR
In accordance with Miami Code Sec. 2-36, since the Mayor did not indicate approval of
this legislation by signing it in the designated place provided, said legislation now
becomes eflecbe with the elapse of ten (10) ys from the date of Co mission action
mgwft same; the Maw x i �ajvveto.
ATTEST:
W . Foeman, City Clerk
WALTER J. FOEMAN
CITY CLERK
APP',�ED P/TRM AND CORRECTNESS
ALWMDRO VILARELLO
TY ATTORNEY
W2911:csk:GMM
This Resolution shall become effective as specified herein unless vetoed by the
Mayor within ten days from the date it was passed and adopted. If the Mayor
vetoes this Resolution, it shall become effective immediately upon override of
the veto by the City Commission or upon the effective date stated herein,
whichever is later.
-7-
98- 937
All of Tract D,
Book 50, Page
D described as
Block 1, DU PONT
11, of the Public
follows:
EXHIBIT "1"
PLAZA, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat
Records of Dade County, Florida, LESS that • portion of Tract
Begin at the Northeast corner of said Tract D and run West along the North line of Tract D
for a distance of 645.94 feet to a Point of Curvature; thence Southwesterly along a circular
curve to the left, having a radius of 25.00 feet, a central angle of 61'26'00" for an arc
distance of 26.81 feet to a Point of Compound Curvature; thence Southerly along a circular
curve to the left, having a radius of 300.00 feet, a central angle of 28'34'00" for an
arc distance of 149.57 feet to a point of tangency; thence run South for a distance of 293.50
feet (said last mentioned four courses being coincident with the boundary lines of said Tract D);
thence run Edst for a distance of 179.41 feet; thence run North for a distance of 150.00 feet;
thence run Edst for a distance of 525.36 feet; thence run North 00'04'07" West along the East
line of said Tract D for a distance of 300.00 feet to the Point of Beginning, lying and
being in Dade County, Florida
98 937 µ
EXHIBIT "Y
That portion of the property containing Miami Center
Existing is described as follows:
Beinq that portion of Tract D, Block 1, •duPont
Plaza,• according to plat thereof as recorded in
Plat Book 50 at page il, of the Public Records of
Dade County, Florida, being more particularly
described as follows:
Begin at the Northeast corner of said Tract D and
run nest along the North line 'of Tract D for
f45.94 feet to a Point of Curvatures thence
Southwesterly along a circular curve to the 12ft
having a radius of 25.00 iaet and i .v.ura l angle
of 61 degrees 26 minutes 00 seconds for an arc
distance of 26.81 feet to a Point of Compound
Curvatures thence Southerly along a circular
curve to the left having a radius of 300.00 feet
and a central angle of 2e degrees 34 minutes 00
secandz for an are distance of 149.57 feet to a
loiat of Tangency: thence South for 293.50 feet
(said last - mentioned four courses being
coincident with the boundary lines of said Tract
D)s thence East for 179.41 feet: thence North far
150.00 feet: thence Last for 5225.36 feet; thence
North 0 degrees 04 minutes 07 seconds West along
the East line of said Tract D for 300.00 feet to
the Point of Beginning, lying and being in the
City of !Miami, Dade County, Florida.
9 b q 37
r-
! 1102 2189
MMIZIfi A
•iKe M
doo�,,•�����w.e•R__�.�•
J••••Yff„f'.Yaas.a —
=21 tit w Imir
all of Tract D, Brock 1 of duPoat Plaza, according
to the plat thereof as recorded on August 17, 1949.in Plat
Bank 50, at page 11, of the Public Records of Dade Caumty,
—�" Tlorida, LM that portion of said Tract D described as
x�•. c£ foilwre : .
-iwwl a•
t Begin at the Northeast coruar of said Tract D and
JE Cv_ rem west &1=%q.the North line of Txaet D for 643.94 beet to
a Point of Cuxvat= ; thence Soutimsstarly along a circular
Li,: 11- carve to the left having a radins of 25.00 feet and a central
angle of 61 'degrees 26 minutes 00 seconds fat an arc distance
�- -
of 26.81 feet to a Point of Compound Curvature; thence
�= 5otttb�rlp aloag...a..miscu3,ar..curvr..to the- left- having--a�adins •
300 lacy and a ceaesal anglo of 28 degrees 34 stiantes
�M j;• 00 sae;ads for an are distance of 149.57 feet to a Point of
tt�. Tangency; thane* South for 293.50 feat .(said last Mwticnsd
jISi� four courses being coincident with the boundary lines of
M I u said Tract n) t theace3 East for i?9.41 feat.; t beaee North
!or 150.00 fast' tbeace•Zast for 525.36 fast; glance NNoxth
*54 3 E= 0 degrees 04 minutes 07 seconds Most along the East line of
31.
said Tract D for 300.00 feat to the -Point of Beginniaq,
lying and being in the City of Mimi, Dade Cmmty, llorida.
n� • 1 ac r l AA-FpYr'`�•. SiAtii! j p'�• '3CC to A "f' ^`� TiYMe i Xitam
•�"y" ill' • j" _ . _ 1 �.."•� a ..'�:
I IV
IITI
m
�Ja � t l - JJI • -r;J • � J -
- 93
JMH/fl
5/17/79
i-
79-396
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI COMMISSION
AL*rHORIZING ISSUANCE OF A DEVELOPMENT ORDER,
APPROVING WITH MODIFICATIO!IS, THE BALL POINT
PROJECT, A DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT,
PROPOSED BY HOLYWELL CORPORATION, FOR TRACT D.
DUPONT PLAZA (50-11). LOCATED ON THE NORTH BANK
AND AT THE MOUTH OF THE MIAMI RIVER, AFTER CON-
DUCTING A PUBLIC HEARING AS REQUIRED BY CHAPTER
380.06, FLORIDA STATUTES, AND CONSIDERING THE
REPORT AND RECOM!IENDATIONS OF THE SOUTH PLORIDA
REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL AND THE PLANNING
ADVISORY BOARD OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, SUBJECT TO
THE CONDITIONS OF THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER ATTACHED
HERETO AS EXHIBIT "A"; THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF
THE SOUTH FLORIDA REGIONAL PLAAT7IXr COUNCIL
ATTACHED HERETO AS EXHIBIT "B"; AND THE APPLICA-
TION FOR DEVELOP!IENT APPROVAL INCORPORATED BY
REFERENCE; FINDING THAT THE DEVELOPER'S PROPOSED
CHANGES FROM THAT APPROVED BY THE SOUTH FLORIDA
REGIONAL PLANNING COl17CIL INVOLVE NO SUBSTANTIAL
DEVIATION; FURTHER DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO
SEND THE RESOLUTION TO AFFECTED AGENCIES AND THE
DEVELOPER.
"DOCIJXENl INDEX
NOI L:.:_... .
WHEREAS, The Miami Planning Advisory Board, at its meeting
held on May 16, 1979, Item fl, following an advertised hearing.
adopted Resolution No. PAB-23-79 by a 7 to 0 6)te (1 member absent).
recommending approval of the Development Order for the Ball Point
Project, a Development of Regional Impact, as hereinafter set forth;
and FINDINGS OF FACT
WHEREAS, Holywell Corporation has proposed the undertaking of
the Ball Point Project, a Development of Regional Impact, as
defined by Chapter 22F-2, Rules of the State of Florida Dow tmmt
of Administration, located within the City of Miami. on a tract of
3.46 acres, at the North hank and at the mouth of the Miami River. 1
comprised of 805,400 square feet of gross office space; 630 hotel
units in a structure containing 658.400 square feet of gross hotel
space; 500 dwelling units; 95.000 square feet of gross space for
retail use; and 2.365 parking spaces; and
QM
vorm w
wYz 4 W6
9 8 .937 �•--------
r
WHEREAS, Holywell Corporation has submitted a complete
Application. for Development Approval for a Development of Regional
Impact to the South Florida Regional Planning Council pursuant to
Chapter 380.06 Florida Statutes, and did receive a favorable
recommendation for a proposed development order on May 7, 1979,
as set forth in the Report and Recommendations of the South Florida
Regional Planning Council attached hereto as Exhibit "B" and made a
part hereof; and
WHEREAS, the Application for Aevelopment Approval, as reviewed
by the South Florida Regional Planning Council, referred to an office
building with 928.200 square feet or gross office space; a hotel
structure with 550,000 gross square feet, and a parking structure
with 2.560 parking spaces, which does not amount to outstanding
change from what is now proposed; and
WHEREAS, Holywell Corporation has complied with all the
requirements set forth in Ordinance No. 8290; and
i
WHEREAS, the City Commission has considered the Report and
Recommendations of the South Florida Regional Planning Council
and each element required to be considered by Chapter 380.06
Florida Statutes; and
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
WHEREAS, the Ball Point Project, proposed by the Holywall
Curporation complies with the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan,
is consistent with the orderly development and goals of the City of
Miami, and complies with local and development regulations, being
Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance No. 6871; and
WHEREAS, the proposed development does not unreasonable inter-
fere with the achievement of the objectives of the adopted State
Land Development Plan applicable to the City of !Miami; and
WHEREAS, the proposed development is consistent with the Report
and Recommendations of the South Florida Regional Planning Council
and does not unreasonably interfere with any of the considerations
and objectives met forth in Chapter 330. Florida Statutes; and
98- 937
WHEREAS, the Miami Zoning Board, on `lav 21, 1979, granted
a variance from the 300 foot height limit and granted Conditional Use
approval for Parking uses as allowed in Ordinance No. 6871, the
Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance for the City of Miami; and
l:'HEREAS, the City Commission has determined that all require-
ments of publication and other legal requirements for the issuance
of the proposed Development Order have been complied with; and
t•?HEREAS, the City Commission deems it advisable and in the
best interests of the general welfare of the City of Miami to
issue a Development Order for the Development of Regional Impact,
as hereinafter set forth;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED 3Y THE COlTtISSION OF THE
CITY Or MIAMI, FLORIDA:
Section 1. A Development Order, attached hereto as Exhibit "A",
approvins with modifications, the Ball Point Project, a Development
of Regional Impact, proposed by Holywell Corporation for Tract D.
DUPONT PLAZA (50-11), located on the North bank and at the mouth of
the Miami River, he and the same is hereby granted and issued.
Section 2. The Report and Recommendations of the South
Florida Regional Planning Council dated May 7, 1979, is attached
as Exhibit "B", and made a part of this Development Order.
Section 3. The Application for Development Approval is
incorporated herein by reference and relied upon by the parties
in discharging their statutory duties under Chapter 380.06 Florida
Statutes. Substantial compliance with the representations contained
in the Application for Development Approval is a condition for
approval unless waived or modified by agreement among the parties.
Section 4. Pursuant to Section 380.06 (2), Florida Statutes,
the City of Miami has reviewed the proposed changes to the Applica-
tion for Development Approval from that approved by the South Florida
Regional Planning, Council, and finds no substantial deviation there-
from.
Section 5. The City Clerk is hereby authorised and directed
to send certified copies of this Resolution immediately to the
Florida Division of State Planning, Department of Administration.
Room 530. Carlton Building, Tallahassee, Florida 32304; to the
South Florida Regional Planning Council, 1515 N.W. 167th Street,
Suite 429, Miani, Florida; and to Holywell Corporation, 2 DuPont
Circle, Suite 100, Washington, D. C.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 24 day of May , 1979.
MAURICE A FERRE
ATTEST:
CLERK
PREPARED AND APPROVED BY:
�:- fal 4�L
stant City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECT7NESS:
4 -9 8— 937 Ir9- a,e
EXHIBIT A
ORWI pM" WIDER
Let it be known that pursuant to Chapter 39D.0 Florida Statutes the 0awdso100
of the City of Miami Florida has considered in public hearing hold on nW 24. 1979
the issuance of Development order for &all Point, a Development of Regiasal Impact
to be located in the City of Mimi.
Pursuant to Chapter 380.06 Florida statutes and after due consideration of the
consistency of this proposed development with regulations, and the Report and
necoonendations of the south Florida Regional Planning Council, the Ccadesion
took the following action: Approval of this development with the following
modifications.
Development
1. The development is limited to a project containing not more than# 80S.400
square feet of gross office specs# 630 hotel units in a structure om-
taining 6S8.600 sq"re feet of gross hotel apace# Soo dwelling units#
85.000 square feet of gross retail use and 2.365 parking spaces. The
project as proposed would comprise an "ore" Flow Area Ratio of 6.36 fac
the 8.46 acre site. approtisl having been previoumly granted far a variance
from the 300-toot Aright liait and conditional use approval for
parking uses. Further. the lot coverage is_jl__6r the grained usable
open space is _ 7 ; the enclosed pedestrian apen specs at wait floor
Level is -L§ -_e as specified by the Applicant in the Application for
Development Approval and the preliminary design documents of March 23. 1979.
as amended by Supplement dated MMY 11 r 1979.
-1-
• 79-396
98 - 937
2. The applicant is encouraged to address the following coacerae
about the proposed developments
a. Activities should be incorporated along the River Walk inn order to
prow 60 meaningful and contiamoss pedestrian experiences and
attractions.
b. Attention should be given to the treatment of the Biscayne
Boulevard facade to ameliorate the apparent bulk of the structure.
C. Attention should be given within the project to providing views of
the Miami River and Biscayne say as, for example, by interior
design of the main floor level.
d. Attention should be given to shaft and landscaping at the podium
level.
These concerns, as shown in construction documents, are subject to Planning
Department approval prior to the issuance of a building permit for parking and
any enclosed areas. Permits for such matters as foundations, seawall renovation
and site preparation will be issued, however, upon proper applications therefore,
before such approval is required.
]. The applicant will dedicate a pedestrian easement of not less then 20 fast
to the City of Miami in perpetuity for Miami River Walk and Bayfront Valk
purposes, and will construct the Walk and provide furniture and landscaping
deemed necessary by the City of Miami, "W applicant will design the ease -
meat area and adjacent private space to allow views and access from the
Project satablishments, while fostering appropriate public use of the walkway.
Responsibility for perpetual msintenaaos of all sections of the Walk by the
Applicant will be specified in the samso at doeam et. Pimal leadsosps plans
are subject to the approval of the Planning Bad Public Worts BBpastammts prior
to the issuance of a permit for the Miami River Walt and Bayfsoat Valk.
'2 ?9•89s
98- 937
PON
Permits for such matters as foundations, sommell renovation and mils immu mmtism
will be issued, however, rpm proper opplicatianm therefor . bmfinen seek
approval is required.
4. The Applicant shall provide landscape treatment for the samtorly end of
Chopin Plasm as a means of connecting the sgfrcet walk with feyfromt
Paris, at least comparable to the dimensions of the Bayfroat Walk,with
maintenance by the Applicant. Final landscape piano are subject to the
approval of the Planning Department and Parke Department.
5. Subject to .obtaining all necessary permits and approvals, In the event
that a Downtown People Mover station is located at. or in the vicinity of.
Biscayne Boulevard between SE lsd and 3rd Avenues, than the Applicant mbell
provide an upper level pedestrian connection to the station.
6. to the event that the deveLper is successful In aogmiring ownership of at
Last three of the four blocks in adjacent Dupont Plana, than the Applicant
shall consider the provision of an upper level padsatrien connection from
this project to the Applicant's future development In Depcst Plana.
V fic Acme@ and Parking
7. Prior to the issuance of a building posrilt, for parking and enclosed acmes.
(parndts for such matters as foundation, seawall renovation and site preparmUum
will be issued. however. upon proper applications therefor. before much aWmv&t
is required), the Applicant shall, wing assumptions, and geoW&%&Qn rates aosapt-
able to the Dade County Department of Traffic and Transportation ("Coumty") and *a
South Florida Regional Planning Council ("Council"). Prepare and ambmit appes-
Priate data and documentation affirmatively demonstrating to the satiefaatimm
of the City of Miami Public Works and Planning Departments ('City') and "a
County acceptable interim improvements to allow roadways to - -b, at 101"a
of service acceptable to the City and the Csanty is the A.M. and P.N. peek hssss
Pending the oopletiam of final traffic irpcovemmmts. the
-r 79-394
98-- 937
Permits for such matters as foun"tic" . seawall renovation and site prepwstiga
will be issued, however, upon Proper applications therefor , before DUO
approval is required.
1. The Applicant shall provide landscape treatment for the easterly and of
Chopin Plaza M a means of connecting the Bayfront Walk with Bayfront
Park, at least comparable to the dimensions of the Bayfrvat Walk,with
maintenance by the Applicant. Final landscape plane are subject to the
approval of the Planning Department and Parks Department.
S. Subject to obtaining all necessary permits and approvals, in the event
that a Downtown People Mover station is located at, or in the vicinity of,
Biscayne Boulevard between BE 2nd and lyd Avenues, then the Applicant shall
provide an upper level pedestrian connection to the station.
6. In the event that the developer is successful in acquiring ownership of at
least three of the four blocks in adjacent DuPont Plaza, then the Applicant
shall consider the provision of an upper level pedestrian connection from
this project to the Applicant's future development in DuPont Plaza.
Traffic Across and Parking
7. Prior to the issuance of a building permit- for parking and Orchard areas,
(permits for such matters is foundation, seawall renovation and site preparation
will be issued, however, upon proper applications therefor. before such approval
is required), the Applicant shall, using assumptions, and generation rat** a0e0t-
able to the Dade County Department of Traffic and Transportation ("County") me as
South Florida Regional Planning Council ('Council"), prepare and submit appze-
priate date and documentation affirmatively demonstrating to the satisfaction
of the City of Miami Public Works and Planning Departments ("City') amd the
County acceptable interim improvements to allow roaAwsya to Opera" at Pawls
of service acceptable to the City and the Cemsly in the A.N. and P.N. peak bemB
pending the completion of final traffic LOPMWOmen". Tba ; 7 9 . 3 9 S
-r
98- 937
9
data and documentation shall also include projections acceptable
to the City, the Council and the County establishing when isplsesw-
tation of interim solutions ahall be required in whole or in part.
Such projections shall be reviewed annually after beginting of
occupancy and, when appropriate. modified by the City, the Council
and the County. The Applicant shall pay its equitable share of the
cost of implementing the acceptable interim improvements. Prior to
the issuance of a building permit for parking and enclosed areas
(permits for such matters as foundation, seawall renovation and
site preparation will be issued, however, upon proper applications
therefor before such approval is required), the Applicant shall
estimate in a manner acceptable to the City or
SC
-79•389
98 - 937
0-
the County. such equitable share and bond that amount with the City or the Corte.
Pt:,r to the issuance of a building permit for parking and enclosed arcs/ (permits
for such matters as foundations, seawall renovation and site preparation will be
i
Issued, however, upon proper applications, therefor before such approval is reqmirmd).
the Applicant shall obtain a commitment on the part of the City and the County to
implement the acceptable interim improvements by the time indicated by the projsctlosm.
Copies of documents, data and commitments chall be sent to the Council and incorporated
into the Application for Development Approval.
B. The Applicant will fund the following improvements to Biscayne Boulevard along the
site which are necessary to accommodate Ball Point traffic: provision of four
traffic lanes on Biscayne Boulevard from the southernmost site access point to SE 20d
Street and will dedicate any property necessary for such improvements: removal of the
island near SE 3rd Street. provision of a traffic signal at SE 3rd Street. and addi-
tion of a second left turn lane northbound onto SE 2nd Street. If approved interim
Improvements. under 7 above, obviate the need for any of these improvements, such
Improvements(s) shall not be required.
9. The Applicant will reserve the land located vast and south of the "stern right -of -sway
of Biscayne Boulevard extended, and will dedicate that land to the appropriate govern -
mat agency if the land is required for construction of a Miami River crossing or.
in the event that such construction does not proceed, will dedicate that land to the
City of Miami for a public purpose.
10. The Applicant will negotiate an agreement with the City of Mimi, providing for two
traffic lanes on Chopla Plaza unobstructed by parking movements for adequate access 4
to the botelg with the balance of right-of-way on Cbopia Plaza devoted to patkins
Miami River Bayfroat stalk purposes and other approved was. The applicant ehall
indemnify the Off -Street Parking Authority for any lose of entered parking speeen
attributable to providing adequate access to the hotel.
-}-
Z9-396
98- 93
r
11. The Applicant Will provide at least the equivalent of the spaces tAat
would be required by the Dade County Zoning Code (Section 33-121(a)) for
exclusive use by condominium residents and guests. The Applicant may
provide such parking supply through construction of additional self-parkistg
facilities; through facility redesign; through design for and provisions of
valet parking, or a combination of the above methods.
Lnvironsental
12. The A.*Iicant Will report to the South Florida Regional Planning Council the
results of its marine community survey before proceeding an seawall renovation.
If viable marine communities are detected. the Applicant will incorporate,
in its Corps of Engineers permit application, measures to minimise impact of
seawall renovation on the** organisms.
13. TM Applicant will inform the Dads County fistoric Survey of the inception
and timing of excavation for the project.
14. The Applicant shall secure a complex source permit prior to the inception of
construction.
15. This Dow lopmsnt Order sha11 be null and void it substantial development of
the site has not befmb within two years of the recorded date of the Devslopmeat
Order.
16. The Applicant will incorporate all additional information request" by tbie
Development Order and revisions omisiitted by the Applicant subsequent to
original submission of the Application for Development Approval late a com-
plete docoment and will provide copies in a timely smaner to the fsatb rleeride
Regional Planning Council, City of Riau&, Dade County and the State.
7b9-396
98- 9C3�7
r-
1?. the Applicatim for OOwlapmrnt ApproVOl to Lftewporatsd bmrda by
reference and relied upon by the parties is dieckoxM emir ototstsry
duties ender mapter »o llovide statstss. sdNMMtial 60011e010 with
the repr+mentatioas osetainsd in the Application fer oevelapomat B"We al
in a Condition for approvel adore waived or modified by aprussnnt Omni
the parties.
.7.
98— 937
J-Ai1
IO/Vu
RESOLUTION NO. 96—�8
A RESOLUTION AMENDING A OMLOPMEHT ORDER
(RESOLUTION ?9-M; MNY Pt, 1979, AS
NE rr0) FOR THE HINU CENTER I PROJECT, A
DEVELOPNENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT. PROPOSED BY
WI MI CUITEIt JOINT VEMTINE, AND LOCATED AT
APPROXIMATELV 100 CHOPIN PLAZA AND
APPROXIMATELY M-5911 S. RISCAYIE BOULEVARD
KING YRACT 0. MOM PLAZA (SO-11);
INCORPORATING THE APPLICATION FOR
OMOP1EMT APPROVAL AND THE REPORT AND
OWNI tNDATIONS OF THE SOMfl1N FLORIDA
NWOMRI PLANNING COUNCIL; MAKING FINDINGS.
A/PIVING SAID PNOXCT SMELT TO TW
MODIFICATIONS TO THE SEVGA" ItrT ONOER
112A1mum TO TIE OMIK SITE; FORM
inns coma POITumm G LY to Tg
SOW 9 i.p AM OF flE $11NO T SITE
MMtAr AS NK WW Rmm trwm NLY KMo1N
AS 11MOM PLC•! Pig= 1 AND I. AND
NMI Vm 01111ITIM III: SWIN11011
101110111 OF 1K SNi C PF&W1 R;;ttMM AS ONE
swain m ttm till 1c mimm A Wd
aPai OF VK MIEN m Emma AN
N SIDE 11 Ar KI AIWIU AND
111111 t. min MMlam Planning AbHwy Board, at Its seat/al told oa MUrr 15,
1079, IfM #1, hltaWUy m 460 0199/ MNBW4499 SdWW MloaalntlSo No. ►*41-
?P or a 1 « 0 rams (l now meant), raeo■md as approval of go
%WUP■ K Order tw 1110 Oall Mot Pnjoct, (ARA NIsM Costar I pvjwt). a
Oaaalamoo t of wloanl l+act; ad
ilil=lO, molovell Conwattoa proposed as warming of as sell Po/at
Pryaet WA Now comm" r 1 Pwaet) a DMUPMaat of Reponal Ir*Wt, as
rflaM y t4/or W-t, 0a/oa of we Stott of Ilorlde Ospar,maat at
AdmlMaVotto4 10 -1 rttlda ales MO of NOW, as a troet of land
OMt#1NNNO mWea1■atoly 8.46 acres locatod as tit Nara Nark at the month of
tea Not there cow and of MOM SgmWe tart of P1oat office space; 00
lanai Witt to a St W"re oo11 MaO 1100,000 araara fact of rasa 1ota1
GPM; M dra11108 malts is to man "owning MOM $* wo fact of
Voss r:sldest/al apace; Is.000 own" hat of gross spats far re"ll m; and
2.60 PettNM Smm. and
MENM- HO)ywll CarWattoa aalWNtted a cocelate Ameltcatton for
Develop at Approval !or a DcwlaPaeat of Reploaal ta+aet to tAe South FleMda
7-gagor
0!
98- 93`7
0
Reliant Flaming 'CONK fl Pu want In Chapter 3110.06 Florida statrtea, and dild
rocoI" a favorable recomandatien ter a proposed dawlap■dat ardor as Mp 7.
1979, as set for in the Report and Recommdatians of the sago Flo-ft
Regional PIMIng Council; and
VWREAS, the Application for Dovelopsisat Approval, as reviawd Id the
Smith florid@ Regional Flaming Council, referred to an office Mii I" wio
l2$,200 sgwre feet of gross office space; a Mte1 struhctare with 50O.000
gees square lost, um cendoninive tohtsrs with OK.700 great sggan feet and a
parking structure with 2.50 partial spaces; and
Offun. Netyattll Cerpratim ""lied with all the rMirwents set forth
to Ordinance No. $tgo by appearing Wore the City of Mimi planing Advtsmy
lewd; and
iKKAS. the City Cannissian considered the Report and Rm:sattandatims of
the Ssgth Florida Regional Planning Council dated No 7. 1979 ad sash el"M
rehired to be considered by Chapter th0.O6 Florida Stelant and
Ww", the $all point ►mjwt. as originally prow" by the wlluyll
Cogwet/en in IM, NMI ied with the Mimi Caiprehwt tw wigMaMAeM Man.
�?
hrM thin/"" with the ~y dawlaptiMt ad goals of the City aR-11 M,
ad c"lled with Iasi ad dwelapawnt "latiens, being am the
COWOMsive IN%$ Orrtaance w. am; ad
1t the sell point pNWW did not Wrea"naly latu r" a with- Me
^ '
aeh"Umt of go ddecttm of ths adapted State Lind latoitprnt, no
'}ra
"Oftailte to the Cie of NW; 4"
�. the fall NNnt "Watt M atnsbtwt of Mt aeon 40
ft=MdrNwe of the fad rlwft Na$iwal piMntn$�tr,h:il aat� dlliral�t
a,.
awr ably tnterpare wfth cop. at thn ansidwatlene and Skeen W on
in awter nk norlds titattrbast ad
KpJIS. the Matti teninl seerr. M ilp g. 1Ul, $ldntad a.
the $w feet beigbt iiuit ad $ranted CaadttianN No cop wnl tv part
.
alai the allowed in ora mp w. •71. as thw•CstprMMe " 200160 10"Ok ;,
for She CtV of Mimi and
NMU$ the Ci'T CearissIN a ttAft W that , s1t
ptbl icatftj ad ether logel ra pireotnts for a* htthtnohr a1 tbn
4:.
;�
$ovelopnmt Order had paw caviled witht and
V ENEAS, the MY Cattatasisn datdted it abtsablo sad In tho `fit..-
ai the goheral Welfare of the City of M/a@i to !sane a $svouptWt i)rdlltr��►
�� 98- 937,�.
the Sall Point project (AKA Mimi Center I project) a OMIOpmxeet of Regiaaal
Impact; and
WHEREAS. the Mimi City Commission, by Resolution 79-396; May 24, 1979.
issued a Developumit Order, attached hereto as Exhibit W. approving with
maodifications, the Ball Point Project (AKA Mimi Center I project) a
Developwnt of Regional !pact, as proposed by Molywell Corporation for Tract
0, DUPONT PLAZA (5D-11), which project was limited to 928.200 square feet of
gross office space; 630 hotel units in a structure containing 650.000 square
feet of grow hotel space; SOD dwelling units in two towers containing $66.700
square feet of residential space; 75.000 square feet of gross retail use and
2.666 Parking spaces; and
MEREAS, time Miami City Commission by Resolution W707; September 26.
1960. amended the Develop Order (Resolution 79-396; May 26. 1979) by
amuMMg paragraph 7 of Exhibit 'A` to provide tMt the lfolyweli Corporation
reach agreement an interim traffic improvements prior to the issuance of a
Certificate of Occupancy rather then prior to issuance of a building permit
and, foram findtag that this ammdmmt did met constitute a substantial
dwiotim frmm tha to, of the Oavelopwnt Order (Resolution 79496; hap► 24,
1979); aM
IRO:KU, the development on the north arm of the site described IN
ExhiNt 'E'. MIMI Caster Exlsttng'1 Asa been largely completed. and a
Certificate of Occupancy Isms boon issued, S§bJsct to a restrictive ceemaat
adiustag rasing conditions In the Oevelopemt Order. and
IRRna, the Mimi Center Joint Venture (•Applicant' ), sraessors im
Utersst to the Molywell Corporation, had proposed amending as •wel"mmt
Order to ddwW the dewlepemt allowed m the souNim 3.01 ecru N fte ON
&MM Wtieslerly don =*W m tm bfbft TO attached he to aed menu hnem as
Nbe NMet ►lase'li a:lafeimg that am* nNammnt did an' Vamovskmti
smtetantiee doutiem; and ar MCI*
WWM, the Miami ►lemUg Advisevy Nerd, on-FdW%MWy 46 IM, br e • a i
0 vote racsmsmded that the ammdemb emsetitstsd sabstmtial dwNillmml Iw
be raforred to the Swth Florida Regional Nomlmg Count"; and
00", Mr. Froab Callahan. Chairmm, SautA Florida Repenal
Councll. to a letter to am Miami Nwor Maurice Form. dewt" Fobrftly Wi.,'
W6. stated that the prop"" mmdmmta omstitslN Is 0sh1111eetla4blr>OW
aces►ding to Chapter th0.06(17) F.S.i that the Cesnoil mwdld ,q0*
->~. 9 g - 937
s xrrw�haee:7r..
dec is ion of the MY to the contrary. and wwd the appt fcant to snlntt as
amended Application for Development approral to the Coawcn and City; and
MiMM, an March 20, 106. in pubic bearing before the Miami C"g
Cammissian. the applicant withdrw the item; and
MERM, pursuant to Chapter 3B0.06 (17)(a) F.S. (1963) the MWAWamts
pr+aposed by the applicant constituted a substantial deviation from tars of
the previously issued Developemnt Order; and
WOW, Applicant has submitted an amended Application for Development
Approval for a Development of Regional Impact for the entire 8." acre site of
the Niami Canter I prgjoct as July 11, 1966, more particularly described le
Exhibit V attacked hereto, to the South Florida Regional Planning Coemcil
porsomat to Chapter 300.06 F.S. Said application requests changes en omly the
One 0upant Plata Prgject site b deleting the Previously $proved ewe teuers
comprisiwg no duelling units of 0g 'm square feet of gross residential
bunding arse ad I,M part %$ spaces and subetitmting the follawfmg
therufar. 00 mind we ttuers Comprising 150 duollI" twits of 300,000 gray,
square feet ad MOOOD puss square feet of o Mfol no; 2,4f10 = Brats
agoare feet of office use and retaining I= Nuking $paps, altagether
awls," 2,4006000 Vase Nmare feet; end
rE>IM, the South nerI t 1091001 ►I Ming CONCH, a Fdmtml 3.
UK recommeded Appruwl, with condltiens, of the proposed rwis" Projeet a
`owe empant Plata% as set forth ion the Ryort and Roo�rssewdat;jNa .fit:
South nwift Qegfewal Planning Council, dated Fahwnr 4, M, attem"'m
L66ft V aid ..r a part benof; and �z
lam, A0116- mt his NMI Ud wfth all the rageiromm sit two Im
Or fmtmoe oft as ..emdod. 0he tawty Wdomm of the CA* of
Portalm's" to the southern 3.01 acres of the site., and
1fNUM, the C"W Commission has comsid red the Report am 1h,"
of the South Florid. It"Ismal Plowing Comottl dated iabiwary 4
oloment re IMW to be comssidwed Or Cheptor 310.06 F.S.; mod '
M KU. the One Oupowt Plata prejeet admpl ias Ufa tea Cfbi'a�" Mfalet
CamprMensioe Neighberhoed Plan, is consistent nth the W&P* Iii4ANj6t
the City of Niami, and ceaplios, as to the northerly 6.4f MM of
knows as 'Meal tenter ExisttW (tth'f►it
devel opsnt regulations end camel iet. a< to no SW"043?
site known as "Ono Dupont Plata` (EAlbit IF% ►Mies I asd t, w1 .i"
land decal
epmane regmlatlon:: oe
(93.7 —:�
VNIUL 66 Ples ane donne
-
r
.aNay.e.c of the Ivor the aiBMBet.s nor.
applicable to the City of Miami; and
VMWAS. the One Dupont plaza is consistent with the Rupert need
RecawmmidetlMs of the Sorts Florida Regional ►lanning Council (Fammy d.
1166) and does not unreasonably interfere with any of the considers aN
objectives set forth in Chapter 390 F.S.; and
WNWAS. the Mtamt Zoning Bard, at its amating of June i. 1106, Item 3
following an advertised hearing. adopted Resolution ZB 5B-B5 by a g to 0
vote. grMting a variance, with conditions. from Section M3. Zoning
Ordinance "00. to provide 3 of 10 rogeirod off-street leading stalls 12' x
35' x 15' ad 6 of B reRuired off street loading stalls 12' x 65' x 15% and
IRERE , the Miami pla Ing Advisory Bard, at its meeting of June IB.
1BB6. item 1. following an adwsrtisN hoorfng. adopted Resolution MB am 15r
a g to 0 voq, rocammsnding approval, with modif Ications, of the amended
Development Order for the Mimi Center I project; ad
VWDS. the CfV COMMiSSION. at its meeting of June ti. 1904. Item pZ--13
pauN Motion WRO Mich continued the it= to 3:30 pm, September 26, 19%,
subject to the applicant's acceptance of to tin imima raaNm-to as outlined
Igo the Plammtng DSpartmwt; fail UB which the appl kart world not be r"Ired
to appear, ad
tmttm. the MY Commusim has dot mood that all respiro■mb of
publtcattan ad otter lop) roWrsmem for the iasmamee of ton Development
Orden bmve been complied with; and
1lB 'the C"W Commission door it afthahle and in the but tntereats
Of the ONW111 welfare of the CltW of Miami to approve an amended Development
Order ftr No NUmi Center I project. a /eve/apnent of Reg/enal Japan net
b"t ufBmr set forger=
_P
BBM. i1EREFBIE. BE IT WOURD IT THE CWISS= d lit CM OF NVM.
nook
FINDINK OF FACT AM COi MUiI01a OF LAM
section 1. The following findings of fact ad conclusion of Ur are moods We
respect to oho project:
1
A. The City Commission herebey determines that One Docent Plata is
In cafemity with the adopted Miami Comprehensive Mioberhaad
3
Plan.
s
b. The City Commission hereby determMes that One Dupont plus is
In accord with the zoning district classifications of Z"" ,
Ordinance 29W.
C. The City COMMISSION hereby finds that One Dupont place Wald Net v
have an adverse taoact a soft%. matul 1ih, or
17
W W
further finds that it would have a number of positive impacts
including;
I. Up to 2.500 permanent new jobs would be generated by the One
Dupoa.t Plaza project, and, as a result. nearly 2.900
additional full-time Jobs could be created in South
Florida, with a S10B million increase in total wages and
5164 million in value added to the regional economy.
2. A net positive fiscal impact of $8.1 million would be
created by the One Dupont Plaza project.
3. A reduction in the growth of regional energy consumption
would result from the energy efficient conservation measures
proposed by the Applicant.
d. The City Cowission hereby finds that One Dupont Plaza would
have a number of adverse impacts which result from the normal
course of development or can be potentially mitigated by the
applicant through the conditions in the Development Order. as
follows:
1. Increase annual anergy use within the Region by the
equivalent of nearly 6.7 million gallons of fuel oil.
2. Increase the amount and wdOer of hazardous wastes generated
on -site.
3. Place additional unfunded demands upon police. emergency
rescue. and fire services.
S. Generate 2,464 AM and 2.250 PM peak -hour vehicle trips
(Miami Center existing and One Dupont Plaza) on the regional
roadway network and, along with other development traffic,
reduce levels of service on segments of the regional roadway
network.
Section 2. A Development Order. amending Resolutions 79-396; May 24.
1979, as vended by Resolution W 707; Septasber 25. 1260; being the
Development Order for the Ball Point Project. AKA Miami Center I Project. a
Development of Regional Impact, proposed by Ethan Mins1W. as agent for Miami
Center Joint Venture ('Applicant'). for Tract D. OU PW PLAZA (60-11)
P.R.D.C. is hereby approved with conditions. and granted and issmmd in be
parts; Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part of this Resolutione
pertaining to the entire 8.46 acres of Miami Center I (more particularly
W
described in Exhibit '0" attached hereto and made a part hereof), and Exhibit
"B% attached hereto and made a part hereof, pertaining only to the southerly
3.01 acres of the site known as the 'One Dupont Plaza" Projectl, Phases 1 and
2 and more particularly described in Exhibit 'F", which is attached hereto and
made a part hereof. Exhibit "B' shall be binding only upon Applicant, its
assigns and/or successors, and shall constitute a covenant running with the
land for the southern 3.01 acres that are part of the One Dupont Plaza project
in accordance with Section 9 of this Resolution. Nothing set forth in Exhibit
"B' shalt be binding in any way upon the owners of Miami Center Existing, its
successors and/or assigns, nor shall anything in Exhibit 08' increase,
decrease or otWvfse affect the obligations of Miami Center Existing under
Exhibit W. To the extent that there are any obligations, rights. duties,
privileges or liabilities set forth in Exhibit "A' which are in conflict with,
or which are substantially similar to, obligations, rights, duties. privileges
or liabilities set forth in Exhibit "B% then, as to the southern 3.01 acres.
Exhibit W shall control and supersede Exhibit 'A'; provided. however, that
nothing in Exhibit "8" shall be construed to in any way control or supersede
the provisions of Exhibit 'A' as the latter apply to the northern 6.46 acres.
Section 3. The Report and Recommendations of the South Florida Regional
Planning Council dated February 4. 1286. is attached hereto as Exhibit 'C' and
Dade a part of this Oewlapow t Order, provided however, that nothing set
forth in said Exhibit Y", shall be binding in any way upon 'Mimi Center
Existing' (the northern, developed portion of the Mimi Center I project
i
consisting of the Motel Intercontinental [F/V/A Pavilion Motel]. the Edward
Nil office building and garage and associated uses described in Exhibit
"E"). its successors and/or assigns. The Report and Recommendations of the
�i
South Florida Regional ►laming Council dated May 7. 1979. an file with the
City Clem as Exhibit 09' to Resolution 79-396; May 24, 1979, remains in
effect only a not superseded by Section 2 herein or in conflict with the
aforementioned Exhibit "C" or Exhibit *8' attached hereto.
1 The Namur of the proposed project on the southerly 3.01 acres of the eriginel {
Mism/ Center i Project boa boon cha pd from 11scy►M ►ten" to 'None
011ent P1aza' because Of a NOW conflict with an existing 'Nbcgno Plan
Shspptng Center and Office Complex." Mr. Russell Mirt44 prepmed dbvelegew
of the southern 3.01 acres described in Exhibit F. attached hems, r
stipulated to the Naar change, an the record, deriM thm Plan" Aar>�
Nord Meeting of June 18, 1986.. Cons tly. tie pro~ Lxblb t
mondmmnts to the Dewlopnnt Order of 1979, as amnmled Is 1990. are few a
project now known as 'One Dupont Plaza'. and will be identified as seek
where possible. Any references to "Niscayne Plaza` arm to be couatrwd ae
references to "One Dupont Plaza' and vice versa.
-7-
98 - 93"7
! 0
Section A. The Consolidated Application for Developent Approval (CAN)
as revised pursuant to Condition 20 Exhibit 'B' is incorporated herein by
reference and is on file with the City Clerk and is relied upon by the parties
in discharging their statutory duties under Chapter 3BO.06 F.S. and local
ordinance provided, however that nothing set forth in the CADA shall be
binding in any way upon the owner of 'Miami Center Existing' (the northern.
developed portion of the Miami Center I project consisting of the Motel
Intercontinental (F/K/A Pavilion Hotel), the Edward Ball office building and
garage and associated uses), its successors and/or assigns. The Application
for Developaw!nt Approval. filed in 1979. as revised pursuant to Condition 16
of Exhibit 'A' of Resolution 79-396. May 24. 1979. remains in effect only as
not superseded by, or in conflict with, the aforementioned Consolidated
Application for 0evelopment. Approval. Substantial compliance with the
representations contained in the Applications for Developeient Approval are a
condition for approval unless waived or modified by agreement among the
Council. City and Applicant, its successors and/or assigns. jointly and
severally.
Section S. Exhibit 'A' and Exhibit W shall be binding upon the
Applicaat Maui Center Joint Venture and its successors IN interest as
provided herein. Exhibit 'A' shall be binding upan the ewer of Miami Center
Ex/stlq and its successors and assigns.
Section 6. The Development Order attached to this Resolution for
oewlopmwt of the One Dupont Plus project shalt expire an Docember 31, 1916.
ff prior to that date the applicant has Net obtained a foundation building
permit for One Dupont Plus. Phase 2. or upon certification by the ►tanning
Director to the City Commission that ail conditions of the Development Order
Maw been met, whichever is earliest. provided further that in any ewmt the
Developmamt Order will terminate on January 1. 2000.
Section 7. The City Clam Is hereby authorised and directed to sand
certified copies of the Resolutions Immediately to: The Florida DepartWt of
Ceuu mitt' Affairs. 2671 Executive Center Circle East. Tallahassee, Florida
32301; Tha South Florida Regional ►laaning Council. 3440 Hollywood Oewle#ard,
Suite 160. Nollywomd, Florida 33021; Ethon Niasky. Esq.. Shea and Gould. 40
Orletell Avenue. Suite 1401, Mimi, neride 33131; and Jeffrey Oeroow, Eel.,
Steel Netter 6 Davis. 4000 Southaast Financial Center, Miami Florida 33id1-
2396.
Section B. The recitals of fact referred to iN the "IOEREAS' cis"* are
true and to, and made a part hereof. 9 8 - 9 e, 7
0
W
Section 9. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to reeerd
this Development Order, consisting of this Resolution and Exhibits 'A', 'L',
'C', 'D', 'E', and 'F' and their attachments, with the Clerk, Dade Coa ty
Circuit Court, pursuant to Section 360.06(16)(f), Florida Statutes (1905).
specifying that this Development Order is a covenant running with the land
that consists of the southerly 3.01 acres that is the site for the Biscay"
Plate project and fire particularly described in Exhibit 'F'. This covawant
shall be binding on Miami Center Joint Venture. its successors and/or assigns.
jointly or severally.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 7tr day of October 1966.
i
ATTEST:
I Al�a'
REVIEWED AND APPROVED IT:
*T:cI ATTORNEY
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND
CORMTiE .
UUUbMWXk4-
CITY ATTORNEY
-9-98 - 937
Resolution 79-36: ley 24. 1979
Resolution W707: sept4mmr 25, 1980
Exhibit •A'
Attached to and nos a part
of Resolution 66-M
October 7, IM
937
J-90-897
11/08/90
RESOLUTION NO. J tl 11 11
A RESOLUTION, WITH ATTACHMENT, AMENDING A
PREVIOUSLY ISSUED DEVELOPMENT ORDER FOR MIAMI
CENTER I (RESOLUTION 79-396; MAY 24, 1979, AS
AMENDED), A DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 380.06, FLORIDA STATUTES,
BY AMENDING THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER FOR ONE
DUPONT PLAZA (EXHIBIT "B" OF RESOLUTION
86-828, OCTOBER 7, 1986), LOCATED AT
APPROXIMATELY 301-399 S. BISCAYNE BOULEVARD,
MIAMI, FLORIDA (MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED
HEREIN), BY AMENDING CONDITION 29 TO EXTEND
DEADLINES BY THREE MONTHS (EXTENDING THE
LATEST DATE FOR COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION
TO FEBRUARY 21, 1990, AND THE DATE OF
EXPIRATION OF THE SUBSEQUENT ONE YEAR STAY TO
FEBRUARY 21, 1991), AND TO REVISE CONDITIONS
17F, 17G, 24 (FIGURE 7) 25F, 25G, AND RELATED
CONDITIONS, ACCORDINGLY; INSTRUCTING THE CITY
CLERK TO TRANSMIT THIS RESOLUTION TO STATE
AND REGIONAL AGENCIES AFFECTED PARTIES AND
THE APPLICANT; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
WHEREAS, on September 10, 1990, the applicant, Miami Center
Joint Venture, filed an application to amend a previously issued
Development Order for Miami Center I (Resolution 79-396;
May 24, 1979, as amended) a development of regional impact per
Section 380.06, Florida Statutes, by amending the previously
issued Development Order for One DuPont Plaza (Exhibit "B",
Resolution 86-828, October 7, 1986) located at approximately 301-
399 S. Biscayne Boulevard, Miami, Florida, and more particularly
described as the Southerly 3.01 acre part of Tract D, Block 1,
DUPONT PLAZA, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat
Book 50 at Page 11 of the Public Records of Dade County,
Florida; and
WHEREAS, the application does not effect "Miami Center
Existing" which is the First Union National Bank Office Building,
parking garage, podium and the Hotel Intercontinental on the
northerly 5.01 acre tract; and
WHEREAS, the Miami Planning Advisory Board, at its meeting
of October 3, 1990, Item No. 4, following an advertised public
�vimv pp CITY COMMSION
A A C H M EG WIE£ ING OF ..
NOV 8
CONTAINED
RESQLIITf011 0e9 0 — 1
hearing, adopted Resolution No. PAB 70-90, by a 8 to 1 vote,
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of amending the Development Order for Miami
Center I, as hereinafter set forth; and
WHEREAS, on November 8, 1990, in public hearing, the City
Commission granted a three month extension to the terms of the
Development Order, and asked that the item be brought back to the
January, 1991, Planning and Zoning meeting; and
WHEREAS, the City Commission, after careful consideration of
this matter, deems it advisable and in the best interest of the
general welfare of the City of Miami and its inhabitants to amend
the Development Order for Miami Center I as hereinafter set
forth;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF MIAMI, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The recitals and findings contained in the
Preamble to this Resolution are hereby adopted by reference
thereto and incorporated herein as if fully set forth in this
Section.
Section 2. Exhibit "B" of Resolution 86-828, dated
October 7, 1986, is hereby amended in the following respectsvi/
"THE APPLICANT, ITS SUCCESSORS, AND/OR ASSIGNS JOINTLY
AND SEVERALLY SHALL:
17d. In the event that the current Florida Department of
Transportation approved design for the I-95 Downtown
Distributor Bifurcated Ramp System (Figure 4) is
superseded by the proposed Downtown Development
Authority Alternative (Figure 5), fund a fair share of
the incremental costs or receive a credit for any
incremental savings (See Condition 17g) (See
Attachment 7). If any other viable alternative to the
I-95 Downtown Distributor Bifurcated Ramp System is
1/ Words and/or figures stricken through shall be deleted.
Underscored words and/or figures shall be added. The
remaining provisions are now in effect and remain unchanged.
Asterisks indicate omitted and unchanged material.
y0 411
-2-
accepted, as deemed by the Miami City Commission, the
Applicant will fund a fair share of the costs, but not
less than $138,000. (See Condition 17g). If the
Applicant's proposed modifications (Figure 6) are
approved, fund the following items:
Applicant
Item Cost Fair Share
A. FDOT Plan changes arising -- 100%
from following three
Applicant modifications
(Figure 6)
B. Plus the following
additional items:
1) Conversion of Ramp $80,000 $80,000
Embankment
2) Service Road $55,000 $55,000
3) Geometric Modifications $3,000 $3,000
of SE 2nd Avenue/
Biscayne Boulevard Way
Intersection
$138,00+ $138,000+ (but not
less than
the FDOT
bid award)
In this event, (i.e. Applicant's three proposed
modifications in Figure 6 are constructed) funds shall be
made available in a timely manner, prior to the FDOT bid
award for the selected Bifurcated Ramp System; issuance of
any Certificate of Occupancy for One DuPont Plaza (F/K/A
Biscayne Plaza) Phase I, or by jantary 1,
April 1, 1990, whichever is earliest pursuant to
s. 380.06(15)(e)2l Florida Statutes.
17f. If a public sector financing package has not been committed
prior to Becember 31, i991 March 31. 1992, then prior to
obtaining any building permits for One DuPont Plaza (F/K/A
Biscayne Plaza) Phase 2, fund, bond, or provide a letter of
credit in the amount of $517,000 (1985 dollars) to the FDOT
or, in the alternative, loan said amount to FDOT, if
acceptable to FDOT, as the Applicant's fair share
contribution to the $9,763,000 Brickell Avenue Miami River
-3- 5 0 -- "Ill
Bridge replacement, pursuant to Section 380.06(15)(e)2 F.S.
Applicant shall provide the City a letter of credit in said
amount ($517,000 in 1985 dollars) to be applied to the
construction of the above -described improvement prior to
issuance of any (temporary, partial or permanent)
certificate of occupancy for Phase I, which letter of credit
shall be cancelled if said public sector financing package
has been committed for the improvement or five years from
the issuance of said letter of credit whichever is earlier,
provided however that the letter of credit shall be renewed
for an additional five years if required by the Miami City
Commission.
17g. If a public sector financing package has not been committed
prior to December 31, 1991 March 31. 1991, then prior to
obtaining any building permits for One Dupont Plaza (F/K/A
Biscayne Plaza) Phase 2, fund, bond, or provide a letter of
credit in the amount of $5,027,000 (1985 dollars) to FDOT
or, in the alternative, loan said amount to FDOT, if
acceptable to FDOT, as the Applicant's fair share
contribution to the Downtown Distributor Bifurcated Ramp
System, whose total cost is estimated at $56 million (1986
dollars), pursuant to Section 380.06(15)(e)2,L F.S.
Applicant shall provide the city a letter of credit in said
amount ($5,027,000 in 1985 dollars) to be applied to the
construction of the above -described improvement prior to
issuance of any (temporary, partial or permanent)
certificate of occupancy for Phase I, which letter of credit
shall be cancelled if said public sector financing package
has been committed for the improvement or five years from
the issuance of said letter of credit whichever is earlier,
provided however that the letter of credit shall be renewed
for an additional five years if required by the Miami City
Commission.
-4-
90 911
24. Hereby incorporate the attached One DuPont Plaza (F/K/A
Biscayne Plaza) Phase 1 and 2 timeline (Figure 7), revised
September 29, 1990 which timeline will be used by the
Planning Director in monitoring specific conditions of the
Development Order as they relate to city permitting for
specific components or phases; provided, however, that
deviations from the timeline shall not be construed to be
substantial deviations from the terms of this Development
Order.
25f. If a public sector financing package has not been committed
prior to Becember 3 fir March 31. 1992, withhold issuance
of any building permits for One DuPont Plaza (F/K/A Biscayne
Plaza) Phase 2 until the Applicant funds, bonds, or provides
a letter of credit in the amount of $517,000 to FDOT or, in
the alternative, loans said amount to FDOT, if acceptable to
FDOT, pursuant to Condition 17f. The City shall withhold
issuance of any (temporary, partial or permanent)
certificate of occupancy for Phase I. until the Applicant
provides the City a letter of credit in the amount of
($517,000 in 1985 dollars) to be applied to the construction
of the above -described improvements, which letter of credit
shall be cancelled if said public sector financing package
has been committed for the improvement or five years from
the issuance of said letter of credit whichever is earlier,
provided however that the letter of credit shall be renewed
for an additional five years if required by the Miami City
Commission. The City does not guarantee the completion of
this improvement.
25g. If a public sector financing package has not been committed
by Becember 31; i991 March 31, 1992, the City shall withhold
issuance of any building permits for the One DuPont Plaza
(F/K/A Biscayne Plaza) Phase 2 until the Applicant funds
bonds, or provides a letter of credit in the amount of
$5,027,000 to FDOT or, in the alternative, loans said amount
-5- y 0 _ 911
to FDOT, if acceptable FDOT, pursuant to Condition 17g. The
City shall withhold issuance of any (temporary, partial or
permanent) certificate of occupancy for Phase I, until the
Applicant provides the City a letter of credit in the amount
of ($5,027,000 in 1985 dollars) to be applied to the
construction of the above -described improvements, which
letter of credit shall be cancelled if said public sector
financing package has been committed for the improvement or
five years from the issuance of said letter of credit
whichever is earlier, provided however that the letter of
credit shall be renewed for an additional five years if
required by the Miami City Commission. The City does not
guarantee the completion of this improvement.
29. Stay the effectiveness of this Development Order - Exhibit
"B" - if One DuPont Plaza (F/K/A Biscayne Plaza) Phase 1 is
not under construction within three (3) years and three (31
months from the effective date of this Development Order or
by February 21. 1990. "Construction" is defined as the
issuance of a foundation building permit and completion of
construction allowed by the foundation permit; "effective
date" is defined as forty-five (45) days after the issuance
of this Development Order by the Miami City Commission or
November 21, 1986. In such an event no development permits
thereunto shall be granted, until such time as an Amended
ADA, providing updated information, is submitted to the
Council, City, and State and an Amended Development Order
issued. Should the Development Order be stayed pursuant to
this Condition and an amended Application for Development
Approval as herein provided is not submitted within one year
after such stay is imposed or by February 21 1991, this
Development Order - Exhibit "B" - shall expire and shall
thereafter have no further force or effect. Exhibit "A" of
this Development Order continues to run with the land.
-6- y0-- 9 t I
Section 3. The City Clerk is hereby instructed to transmit
this Resolution to: Thomas G. Pelham, Secretary, Florida
Department of Community Affairs, 2740 Centerview Drive,
Tallahassee, Florida 32399; Jack Osterholt, Executive Director,
South Florida Regional Planning Council, 3440 Hollywood
Boulevard, Suite 140, Hollywood, Florida 33021; Ethan Minsky,
attorney for Miami Center Joint Venture (the applicant), Shea and
Gould, 1428 Brickell Avenue, Miami, Florida 33131; Jeffrey
Bercow, Steel Hector Davis, 4000 Southeast Financial Center, 200
S. Biscayne Boulevard, Miami, Florida 33131; and Miami Center
Owners Association, Lincoln Properties Company, Hotel
Intercontinental, 201 S. Biscayne Boulevard, Miami, Florida
33131.
Section 4. This Resolution shall become effective
immediately upon its adoption.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 8th day of Npvember , 1990.
�t
XAVIER L. AREZ, R
*HIRAI
CITY CLERK
PREPARED AND APPROVED BY:
e/
40 E. MAXW LL
',,CH EF ASSISTANT` CITY
ATTORNEY
APPROVED AS TO FORM
AND
CORRECTNESS:
JORGE L. ERNANDEZ
CITY ATT NEY
JEM/db/M1789
-7-
90-- 91 1
('11 r ISSUES
DEVELOPMENT ORDER AMENDMENT
EFFECTIVE DATE NOV 21.1986
CITY ISSUES `
DEVELOPMENT ORDER
AMENDMENT
4 YEARS i
1990
1
CONDITION 16 1
CITY ISSUES
BUILDING PERMIT FOR PHASE I
START OF CONSTRUCTION (PH 1 )
9I 1 I 1992
CONDTION 22,
CONDITIONS 11,17b, D23 1I23,2
18,19
CONDITIONS 2,3
CONDITIONS 1,4,5,6,7,9,101
12.13.14. 15,17a, 17c,25a,
25D,2B
YDITIONS 20,21
M I A I M I J I J I 4 I S 0 N
TIME LINE (IN MONT
CONDITIONS 22,23,24
CONDITIONS 4,5,7,25o,25c,25d,25e,25f,25g.
CITY ISSUES CERTIFICATE CITY ISSUES
BUILDING PERMIT
OF OCCUPANCY (PH 11 (PH2)
COMPLETION OF START OF CONSTRUCTION
CONSTRUCTION (PH I 1 (PH 2 )
PUBLIC SECTOR
FINANCING PACKAGE
1993 1994
I
CONDITION 29
CONDITIONS 22, 23,24 CONOTT10N 23 CONDITIONS 22.23.24
CONDITIONS 2,3
i CONDITIONS 1,4, CONDITION 7
7.10.11.13,14.15.17e,
17f,17q,IB,19,25e,
25f,25q,25h,28
CONDITIONS 17d, 22 CONDITION 8
17f, 17p
FIGURE 7 MIAMI CENTER I/ ONE DUPONT PLAZA TIMELINE
CITY ISSUES
CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (PH 2)
COMPLETION
OF CONSTRUCTION (PH 2)
1995
IMIJIJIAISIOINID
CONDITIONS 26,27
CONDITIONS 22,23,24
CONDITIONS I III 25e
CONDITION 8.25c CONDITION B
DEVELOPMENT ORDER EXPIRES
DECEMBER 31, 1996 OR SOONER
OR AT THE LATEST BY JANUARY I, 2000
NOTE THE TEXT OF THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER GOVERNS
DEVIATIONS FROM THIS TIMELINE ARE NOT
CONSIDERED TO BE SUBSTANTIAL DEVIATIONS
CITY OF MIAMI PLANNING DEPARTMENT
REV,6/26/86 9/24/90
_. 10/7/86- - _--._--
TO
FROM
CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA
INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM
Walter Foeman, City Clerk
City Clerk's Office
k, ssistant Director
Planning Department
DATE: December 15, 1998
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 98-937
REFERENCES:
ENCLOSURES: Exhibits "1" and "3"
Upon review of Resolution No. 98-937, it has come to my attention that two very important
exhibits are missing. Exhibits 1 and 3 are both referenced on page 4 of the Resolution, but
were not included in the certified resolution. These two exhibits were included within the
backup for the Office of Hearing Boards.
Please include the enclosed exhibits, as soon as possible, within the Certified Resolution so
that it can then be transmitted to the Department of Community Affairs.
FILE:
Thank you for your assistance and please call me at 305-416-1405 if you have any questions.
LYS/ar
98 937
0
• 1=1191T "B'-
1515 n.w 1671h meet, suite 429. moo ta. nonoo 33169 305'621-5a71
May 7, 1979
The Honorable Maurice A. Ferre
Mayor
City of Miami
3500 Pan American Drive
Miami, Florida 33133
Dear Mayor Ferre:
The South Florida Regional Planning Council has officially adopted
the enclosed Regional Impact Report and forwarded copies to the
Director of Planning, the applicant, the Dade County Developmental
Impact Comr.ittee, the South Florida Water Management District and
the Division of State Planning. The report is provided for your use
in reviewing this Development of Regional Impact pursuant to Sectlon
380.06, Florida Statutes.
While the staff of the Council is available to assist in the resolution
of any matter regarding the report. the Council has no legal mechanism
through which it can act on this report again. except through appeal
procedures.
Chapter 380.06(7)(e) and (II) require that the City of Miami render a
decision on the application within thirty days after its public hearing.
unless an extension is requested by the developer. Furthermore. the
"development order" (an order granting, denying, or granting with con-
ditions an application for a development permit) must include findings
of fact and conclusions of law regarding the extent to which:
"(a) The development unreasonably interferes with the achievement
of the objectives of an adopted state land development plan
applicable to the area;
(b) The development is consistent with the local land development
regulations; and
(c) The development is consistent with the report and recommenda-
tions of the regional planning agency."
98- 937
The Honorable Maurice A. Ferre
Page ?
i May 7. 1979
Copies of any development order Issued to the applicant with regard to
this project must be transmitted to the South Florida Regional Planning
Council and the Division of State Planning. The statutory 45 day appeal
period is triggered by receipt of your development order.
If we can be of assistance in regard to this report. please have your
staff call Robert Cohn. Senior Regional Planner.
Sincerely.
M. Ba4y Peterson, AICP
Executive Director
MBP/bh
Encloser
cc: Jeannie Crews
Theodore Gould
Ron Hester
Lee Rawlinson
Jim Reid ✓
Alex Sokolik
98- 93"7
0 0
DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT
ASSESSMENT
FOR
BALL POINT
CITY OF MIAMI
DADE COUNTY
79 - 02
SOUTH -FLORIDA REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL.
MAY* 1979
98- 937
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTROOJCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
I
PART 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. 2
A. APPL I CANT 1 NFORMAT I OI. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2
E. PROJECT INFORMATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2
PART 11. EVA'L'OAT10% 0" PR0°JSED 7EVELOD'ENT . . . . . . . . . . . . .
12
A. ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES . . . . . . . . . . . .
12
Sumary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
12
Evaluation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
12
S. E%'=LCY''EN- ANC ECYiWIC C•IARACTERISTICS . . . . . . . . .
16
Su,-.ary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
16
Eval ua' io. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
16
C. P_,B_IC FADILM=_ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
25
S,irrr,ary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
25
Evaluation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
26
D. TRANSPORTATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
33
Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
33
Evaluation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
34
E. HOUSING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
0
Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
IS
Evaluation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
45
PARTIll. REM-WENOATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
47
98- 937
I NTROOCICT I ON
This assessment of the proposed ball Point development has been prepared
by the South Florida Regional Planning Council as required by the Florida
Environmental Land and Water Manaoement Act, for all Developments of
Reaional Impact.
The assessmnn' is based on informa+ion supplied by the applicant, by city
and county staff, official plans, consultants, and through field inspections.
Additional research relative to specific Issues was conducted where needed.
Water and related elemerts of the proiect were reviewed by the South Florida
Water Vanaaement District.
In accordance with the Act, this assessment and report is intended to provide
the City of Via an: the State of Florida with an overview o4 the positive
and ne3ative impacts likely to result from approval of the proposal. The
recommendations are intended to assist the City of Miami Commission in reach-
Ing a decision reaarding the proposed development. They are not intended to
foreclose or abridoe the local responsibility of local government to act
pursuant to applicable local laws or ordinances.
Copies of any "development order" (an order granting, denying, or granting
with conditions an application for a development permit) Issued with regard
to this project should be transmitted to the South Florida Regional Planning
Council and the Department of Administration, Division of State Planning.
98- 937
PART I - PROJECT DESCRIPTION
A. AO-_ 1 `A.j. 1N73RVAT 10%
Proie_* Name: Ball Point
Applicant: Holywell Corporation
11 Dupor+ Circle, Suite 10^
Washington, D.C.
Date cf Acceptance of Application: Marcr, 2, 197r
Local Government Hea-ino Date: Mav 24. 1979
Type of OeveloJmen'.: MixeC use, including office, hotel, retail, and
residential.
Lo_a'ion c1 tivelo.rent: City of ::a^i
B. PRrjECT
Locate: in. tre Pla:a area o1 the N;ari cerral bisiness district
(See -iclire 1). Bali Feint is proposed as a mixture of urban land uses,
o E.46 acres o� 36e,429 square fee' of land. The development site is
bounded by Chocir °laze on the north, Biscayne Boulevard on the west,
the Miam; River on the south, and Biscayne Bay on the east.
The City of Miami has zoned the property C-3 (Central Commercial District),
and, in conformance with such zoning, the Applicant proposes to construct
a sinale integrated structure characterized by a low rise podium and
four tower structures containing office, hotel, and residential space.
A height variance and conditional use permits for residential units and
parking fa_ilities will be require"_.
&a
98 - 937
0 FIGAZ 1 a
LOCATION MAP
90 ` 937
The podium varies in neighs from three f3) to six (6) floors, contain-
inc active pedestrian oriented retaTI space (75,00^ sq. ft.), 2,565 parkins
spaces, service and support facilities. The podium will feature a series
of terraces and "stepped back" faces, ■itt a deck serving as a landscaped
pedestrian plaza and Biscayne Bav overlook.
The office tore- will be lozated in the northwest corne- of the site near
existind aDnm-ereial office buildings in the central business district,
and is Iccate: closes* to a propose station for the Dowrtown People
Mover. In fact, a pedestrian bridoe linking the people mover and office
b-,;ildirr_ is ;lanned by the Ap;lican* and the City. The office tower will
contain a c,ess floor area of 925,2�' square feet and a rentable area of
25J,00_ sCua-e fee, in 42 stories above the podium,. Construction is
^e' it July 19. ri' i-.'ial cc:..ancy in June 1951.
The hctel will be ccnstructed in the northeast quadrant of the site,
bounded by Biscavne Bay and Chopin Plaza, thereby taking advantage of
views of the Bay and Bayfront Park. The hotel will contain 630 rooms,
including 30 suites, a 63,030 square foot conference center* restaurantse
bars, and health clubs. The tower will rise 29 stories above the podium.
Construction is scheduled to begin in July 1979, with initial occupancy
scheduled for September 1981.
Two condominium towers will be constructed along the N.iani River on the
sou'.^end of the site, between Biscavne Boulevard and Biscayne Say. The
-4-
98 - 937
0 4
hctei and cora:)nir*.urs were plannec as an extensic^ of existing water-
f r uses aloe t'c CC: we- fro- the :D.-Drt Claz_ r,ctel. Eacr co-._-
miniu- t.uiIdi r will rise 23 storie' above the pod iur, providing 250
d.pllin" units, housinc about 502 persons.
c:,nj_; niur construction will not begin until one-half of the office
5:a:2 is lease'_ (d:O_' c-e (1) tc, three (3) yea" after CG'7ne'+Cemert Of
office huilCinz construction a::c-din_ to the Aptlicant) with initial
a'•z-• one (1) to twc (2: yea-s rnereefter.
Tales I ar,^ ; provide a buildin! area compilation and construction
schedule, re_pe:-ive,v. Ficurez 2. 3, and 4 present the master develop-
�,- ' _ -•= rc- A:, i_..-• ir_, sicfor pedestria^
m;,r_-+erg t^•-�.,�'•ou' f^= pr2_e_t an: inte--rates these new facilities with
the existin; an= pre:,_sed pedestria^ systems in the central business
district. Such pedestrian facilities include an extension of the Miami
River Walk along the Biscayne Bay and Miami River sides of Ball Point,
as well as landscaped plazas, covered walkways, vista areas, and court-
yards at ground and plaza levels. The pedestrian system is discussed in
more detai! on pages 26-30 (recreation and Open Space evaluation).
Other projects currently planned in the vicinity of Ball Point include
a convention center and world trade buildino west of Dupont Plaza. as
well as Clauohton Island on the south side of the Miami River.
_5-
98 - 937
I I a
MA,j')P
Office lo.c-- 6.4-
Ho*rel 7owe-
a
Retail 8=1 00,-
TOTAL AVERA3E FA6. Y
TOTAL GR)SS S:. FT. 7,3413 701)
-6-
R-ENTA'. LNITS
63.
5N--
RENiTAa;-FSi. FT-
755,003
98-
MAJOR C"'•?JNE4T
Parking S*ructu,e
Office To.e,
Hotel
Con4Dr:IniU" Tcwe�s
TABLE 2
CW-'ENCE
Jul% 1979
February 198-
Feb-uary 195-
At lease -up of 1/2
office soace
-7-
1 N 1.11 1 At:Cr
May 19n
June 1981
September 1981
1 - 2 years after
c < n-,encenen t
98- 937
FIGURE 2
Y Y'� RNR
/
\ ' " ;
ors,Ct UNOT ,
i
.K-
, c
L'to: La--C.;.Lw
, smog
r
u.es .q law"Wr
MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN
GROUND FLOOR PLAN
_6-
km 1
� ..
"a"
98- 937
FIGURE 3
1
irk
SECTION A
MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN
SECTION A
-9-
98- 937
a FIGURE 4
.�7
SECTION 8
MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN
SECTION 8
-lo-
98 - 937
t a
The Applicant also has options to Duy tw: (2) other tracts of land in
D_cc^,t Ola:a, an� is at*w,:tin. tC ottair the re-_,4inin; two (2) tra_ts.
If successful, the Applicart has expressed a, inte�lior to develop uses
pn these tract; in harmony with Ball Point.
cum
98 - 937
PART 11 - E�ALJATION 0' PRO:-,JSEu DEVELOPMENT
A. ENiIR'?NvENT RC, NATURA: RESOUR'_ES
surr-�a ry
I. A co+-plex source permit uncle- air quality regulations will be
reouireC due to the laroe unenclosed parkinc facility in this
oeveloJment.
Tne A',•^li a'.._ -•aq cc3.nll renc,a-io a U.S. Armv Corps
of Engineers permit will be reauireC for this. Turbidity is to
be co^trolled by curtains or similar devices.
3. The proDosec development site has an average elevation of 5.0
fee- NorZ, the minimu- elevatior at which construction is allowed
by race Coun-y. Tn_ eiev3tio cf the firs' finished floor must
be ll.^ few• N-'.'.
<, e"e_'c Q- ve7Pta'ior
or wildlifE.
Eva iva+ion
Air
1. A COMPLEX SOURCE PERMIT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT, HIDER
THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION AIR QUALITY REGULA-
TIONS.
This development will provide parking In a multi -level unenclosed
facility for more than 2,500 ca-s, which reoulres a complex source
permit.
-IT-
98- 937
2. AL%"X7 ALL AIR POLLUTION GENERATERE- THIS PROJECT WILL BE DA
TZ-
Tne A:;^Iicant estirmates motile so ce emissions will total 4,9%
IDs./da. for carto- mcnoxide: 523 Its./da, fc- hydroca,0ons. 635
Its./cm!, fcr Nix. Nc s•a'iona'v D011u'an* soirces are DrODOSe_
a5 :..a O' this JrJJe:'.
Lam:
I. THr OCC'Jp;ivC= Or Lik'ZSTJNSS BELOW THE EXISTINJ
S._ _ _ T-_ c. i _._.L 1': lCA' A D=E° F0.":.:A'10'C
SJZA- DICE:, NIL_ P� _4__Y BE THE E.:_, MEANS OF SJ"ORT.
--=•vim _ re-.:tns are consiste^tiv at
o- Delo.a 2^� fee' in oe "-. Investigative work is continuin_ to
determine the feasitility of otner fojndation systems (such as
mats) w'ic' ma: to n:-e e_o^D-icat if a large n�rnber of piles are
needet.
2. SEAWALL RENOVATION IS ANTICIPATED BY THE AoPLICANT, ANO WILL REQUIRE
A U.S. AWY CORPS OF ENSINEERS PERMIT.
Water
1. THE PR')P^-SEJ DEVFLOPMENT IS ADJACENT TO BISCAYNE BAY, HENCE GROUND
WATERS ARE SALINE. POTENTIAL A;'JIFER RECHAR3E IS NOT A CON!:EaN.
SINCE Ll:OERLY1No A,JIFERS ARE TOO SALINE FOR HJMAN USE.
M
98- 937
a A
THE DRAINASr- SYSTE4 PRISED BY THE A—O ICAN- PER' -'ITS NIO
Sj ;__ wt-ErR_»:_' IRT THE 9w 0= . A-4 ratER Op.;ALI`
IN TmESE APEk� IS EXPECTE: TC I'••q^VE
3. TJ=._iD!'Y D; SILTATio�. MAY RES-7 FRN RE'ZS A'IDh Or TW_ APPLICNi 'S
S:A.�4_:..
Tne AD:,licin, 0 ans to use turtidity cirtains or diapers to cantrol
t' s o:'e 'ial p:!tlutar.t. As mentione: in the "Lan!- section. a
USAGE permit will be required.
Floo: Plairs
I. TH_ E'."I=._ �?J°__,=; DE':EL^=nE. WWIC+ HA_ A'. A\E4A7 ELEVAT101': OF
t;;:�, 1_ h!-��•. THE IJ?- EA= "LOG= P;M-__ LEVEL.
re; r_I flDo: criteria maniates a -firs' finishes floo- elevation of
II far a,: Dane County reouires construction to begin not lower than
5.0 feet. The Applicant states that all structures in the develoolwant
area will nee' or eXCeed these requirements. The local jurisdiction
in whict this development is proposed quelTfies for federal flood
insurance.
Vegetation anC Wildlife
I. CO':STRuC'T10N OF THE PROPOSED DEVELO''NENT WILL HAVE NO SIGNIFICANT
EFFECT 0% PLANT OR ANIMAL COR4J41T1ES.
-14-
98- 937
ADDroxlmately 701 of the site is an asDhalt paveC Da,kinC lot.
try re^,a;n:e- is un;,ave_ fill r.ate'iai. Tne sire Drov:des
e.-re-*elv Da- hafita* for Doll, v,�-]e•atior an: wildlife, 8,1C
n^ sia^ifiC'3n' po-L�Id*;o^s Ot eithe'.
T�iE Ac= I:A':' I G °=E:TL`" S° '-SJ=�E INo �: �I•Jc C7-'1JNITIES IN
r-: T..c p=CF-.
I. N? PO:T10% Or THE PROMI �=D DEVELO"aENT CAN 9E CLASSIFIED AS WT-7-
1 N IT= nr u <T �!,^t nc pD_ 4E?1�-1CR.: �I 'J1=1CA•J�= P.2E Y`J'M".
e' - _.- ---- _.", N�= IS I� .I.__ Trt- A•. E),I:'.
-IS-
9893
a
C:iA=.4,
t. Est .-y* _ e-.l:),- r.t o' co,.s-ruc'ior, en: Ioyets
303
I?=y 91:
19 69:
•iieprit;dr.7; ma --years of construction employment per annul with
p755i`le ca-ry-0ve- c`. e-.!evees froT one year to the next.
88 I Voir, ADA
cIcvme-t t1976 dollars)
E- l0vep Ca-e=--
E_-_10,e,:_
L?•_ A:�
Menia_1
Hipp Av_
Ot�;ce
4,25^
13.100
15,300
17,500
Hotel
671-:
5.557
8.020
IC.483
Retail
303
8,540
10,695
12,850
Fa -«in^: Gara:e
_ 2?
7,80^
9i650
11,500
Tota!
5,245
11,848
14,078
16.30e
' Calculated by Council Staff
SOJ?:r: Ball Foin• ADA
-16-
98 - 937
6L
a
3. F. _ _ C. C:.iCr (I�,c: :a'_
T^-
To -a' 51,l2_,00: 47,591,OC_ 115,752.00-�
a- le.: ^.f _ c ,uC'i exdt+u-es
I�in^ Val uF
Ancua! Yield
-
'.dxES
04fi-e
119 " Cl =
$1,200,85�
S1,392,925
HO1eI
119,1to
82„ 908
1,012,018
Co• i__:' I J•^_
17.J..c,
I+n nic
I�:ZIyGSG
To+al
63E.*�.'
' I=7" illa:e Rdte
S0. Ball Point A0:
98- 937
i a
3. E�tir.a•e� costs of constrictior (w9 collars)
C,)— Co_t
( 9 70
I q?
t 9? I
To+& I
LaLo'
6,-3c,02_
2-,?14,0C'
111,51% 00:,
43,362.07.1
N3�F-ials
E,9 " ,0]�'
.',9ta,�37�
?<,86.,097
52.511.070
?.siona
59.
1,7E°,]^'
1.341,?0_
A Yinis'ra•ive
13
3.673.000
10.2�-3.000
Co••r'a_'or-- ee
_._ .-,--__
.-, ,--_
��_-_��
__5i101itY�_
Total
17,03y,000
51.122,003
47,591,002
115.752.000
1 '✓�:_-I .,=- es•Ina-es
tne' a'
leas* 9 S
of construction
exnenditur*s
tea'^
?ea_` Counties.
4, Tr.- _ jC___ = t_ :e _ :;n:: ._Sitive fis-_ )r;d.'s on Dade
J'-,. 'r_ � 7 -� oI M;a^ . a'.: tn: •_ Cr un', S:nool
Ae--a^c
An^Jal A�
CaID-e. Tax Yield
Lan., Area
Buildinc Value
Annual Yield
Tax_
Taxes
(at .03378E1)
Offi^e
S192,069
S1,200,856
$1.392.925
Hotel
119,110
892.908
1,012.018
Ccrdo-;-,:Jn-
17F —5
1 055 n;o
1 '31 454
Total
S457,59e
S3.14;.B03
S3,636.39'7
' 1974 MiIIaOe Rate
SOJPCE: Ball Point ADA
-17_
98- 9317
i a
Fi5 Ir.: - L'D rr',;e-'I7J� IC-
_7E
A� 1aIC.c �F•vP'J<. I I._,r. -- SI,EG ,IE: S ° � 2°=
cr ic_ �� _--7:a249
Ca:itai O,:tla.
%:_ S 4 1 z 4 U S 77,473
A—,— Of se -vice an! no
cv ly „ _IC^ cIQ-iC-•SC-.,',J! DictriCtS. FY 1976-1977.
E.aI "i�
1. TmE AP=LICAKT ESTIM.A:ES TOTAL CO1- TRUCTION Exc'ENCITURES TO EQUAL
SII°, _ ^J; T4 YEARS. 90" TG EXPE'.?_-- KITHI% B=2-NAFC. WE.
2. Pir- A^^LJ CA: Ex-'ECTS H-ND =JS Or NEW JOBS WILL BE CREATED IN THE
0rFICE PRJJLCT IN AC:�1710K TO 995 JOSS IN THE MOTEL, RETAIL. AAL
CA;�A1E O ' --- A' I O TNT P'JLK Or THESE NO`:-O' F ICE JOBS ARE TARGETED
-18-
98- 9S"�
k a
FO= LOn A':: %T; -'°ATE INC"_dV` Jo-- T SJ�DIE:!_!:T ►✓J'iEHOt=
TA-,_ ?
_. 2-
Tc+ats C 371 I,E3 1,437 910 891 5,245
T", F: _ A -; T,,.- A M1'..__ O' O•FICE T.ENA', = MILL e_
C3!Z:A'.t_5 LC ST : IN OA.� C ,-.',• W' IC, A?- SEEKIN A CENTRAL DOM,-
TOWN LOCA- 17..
Ttw A.-li_:. e :• `: tha' a'. tic-.j^'_s fo- a�,�iticnZl employer train -
in; or-the-JC• '-a; nin2 0- throe �,.
ir_ 17, _ .. , d- S o- c',an_e_ Bd JC8tiP1
i n54i tut i-, iri t
-15-
9�- 90'
61, a
New positions are expected to be filled fro►, the e:istin: regional
la.':,- suoCly wit' the possible exceztjo- o' tra"sfe-ret Cor;,O-ate
e,,<=,;fives fro, outside the Aecion.
4. Th_ A==.ICANT ESTIMATES THAT THE PROJECT MAY PROVIDE EVC' OVI$NT FOR
A *IfRR.'r:Y 150, Or EW:LOYE^ PRO EC' R=;IOENTS, M41LE 70:1 ErPIOhiD
%:T.ile. THE SER1IC: AREA ^_c THE "Of•w.TJi', PEOPLE-
(D-Pkl; SYSTEM.
Developer anticipates condominium units to sell for between t100,000
a-= �I�^,�^", re7uirin_ a Rini^,u- avers:p household income Of $43,000
or. affo'Ja^le ho^e• value: household inco„e factor of 2.5).
K;-�, the ;- c ^se' salar, levels for the project, condoriniue pro-
me=-s ci -:c e-:lovees %;"7r the
T AF.-l{c esii,a+e. tne- 14 (50/4250) of office e^I:loyees and St
(14' c"2) e# re-a;l eT71oyees will reside in project condominium.
5. THE APPLICANT STATES THAT 601 (3001500) OF CONDOMINIL,M UNITS WAY BE
PU?C-1AS-ED By Orr -SHORE (INTERNATIONAL) BUYERS WHO WILL RESIDE AN
AY_ ,AS: Or 3 MONTHS OF THE YEAR AND LEASE OUT THEIR UNITS FOR THE
BA-AhZE 0c THE YEAR.
6. THE ADPLICA'.- ESTIMATES THAT RESIDENT POPULATION MAY CONTRIBUTE UP
TO 451 0; TOTAL RETAIL SALES EXPLRIEN'CED BY RETAIL TENANTS.
-20-
98 - 99�1
OL a
A?'- F 4
C, To,*
Sii,ws
An: a Dr, 1-&, S
f-- wit-tto—a—
A
cal:. t-P7 Cq - Val..
C-O—Q N."iCipaTe:
b. sl, Of I
Sliz:-
ba Po; rl AZA
IA: -'LE 5
c,
Me— SNc.-
c .
fio-, -, cap
15:
sn. W.
3.50-
Is"
525.00C
t.
cla"!
ITS
70:.00-.
9.
Je" I r,
155
58-.50r
h.
A" Get I erN
2.00.
15!
310,000
i.
A'*;QJfs
t.n-
IW
g0.2.00:
j.
5:,o- s
4 .0or
15C
Gx.ow
2. Co
re ence (sot-lefstl
le,50-
Ile'
3.)5%000
2,0 ,
15!
310,00n
F.W
1,5:-
I:c
m.00:
c.
To: a: :-- Notts
NO:
25,
a.
IitlJc-
A,Ow
21S
5.50"
200
1 .
5.0j-
155
775.00:
3. [al..;
a 0^insiey (S.I.-lolpt)
10.5D-
site
3.tfz.50[
a.
slastau's—
6 . 0!,.
ITS
1.051.000
It.
7.5::
21!
I.etz.!y
C.
Gow•tr*
5,030
2r
1.00:.03:
10'ral
W.03-
S164
14. al 0. M:
G- 6--to-c .:I, 9rz,s 1, -e-
al** ULC C' Imo. y1C fl. IS ".I
0n.- it,
Ap.- I s ca-4. .; 1• S'f of Wes tc
be W e,tev' itatt.lv to Itme
bv CowftCll Slit"
490P inlu-&*o,r
P'ovlde(! bv 4rliC&%t.
DIE
C,
98- 9;j
04 a
7. T,4-- AOPJCA!J STATES TmA7 N'D FU'.-_,!N7 ASSISTANCE WILL BE
pz:
E . Tr47 A= LIZ;%- T,-. 1% 07-1EP 0--"ICE PPOACT-
L'), Oil' 1.3 OILL10% Sr. FT. O'
A- T H
a,-2,, 04 f ice sn3::r. n bu I I do
, an � a v,!�; I ati I e �. uDD I v UDO i U
of all V,. j;4below.
74
n C
1) 1 ^,7: Sc. Ft.
i I mi" t -Sr. Fi.
3) Ati i; 13 t- a' Build-'u' _02-,ODS sq. F-.
11. Cu-re- F c A I at I- '�ff icF ize a* Fui I O-Du*
Ill. Ti r-.
sr— vrs.
71 .:. A,: I i 11 -.- * , , - ' ' - t* -,' t, " -a. !.-, :, .1 Der- th, of c�r,_ t-u_;C
LJ will f-I . I !,*izl r-; u, of off;,., s,-nt
-22-
98- 937
The Applica— noes nc* ide'+tify the eff.Cts O' a- adgitional 1.87
riillp- 57. 4T. C+ Office SDa:e Or the o+era'I Ce-a-_ if space I
the other pro:_;e_' prgie_ts will be filled (as proposed in the Sall
Foint aeveloDment) by local firms seekinc to relocate and vacate their
C U're�• c!fice space. Co-secuently, a!:ile nea Cf'iCe space may be
f:lle- tv r._"+ N-ant, ol:+o- a-':!_r less Cen*ra'Iv-lo_a'ej
(': do.-to.r.) buil�inys may becom and/or remain vacant.
9. FISCAL IM-ACTS ON THE COJ47Y. CITY, AN: SCHOOL DISTRICT APPEAR STRONGLY
P'J ITIYE, WIT- N: CAoITAL OJTLAy A%TICIPATEO A� A Pr-S'2L7 Or THE DEVELOP-
M:-'J A-%- C"'°;:4-I1;;`' _L P!=-_IC 0°_ 4-INo EyDr-%I TUBES TO SERVICE
e.=-___ fro- - e e_ (using 19'.
'a• revere_ tC ce- ^-:re total revenues any n:.r-tar revenues). total
revenues excee.' tcral e. enditures (determined fro* 1977 FY expenditures
per eac,ita adjustrz to 197E dollars) by a surplus of 512,783,447 dis-
tributed as follo.s:
Cale Cou^ty: $4,822,571
City of Mia-.i: 55.380.844
Cade County Schos0 s: $2,580.032
10. THE REGIONA: ECON0011C IMPACT OF THE DEVELOPMENT APPEARS POSITIVE IN LIGHT
Or 1) THE POSITIVE FISCAL IMPACTS LPON THE LOCAL AREAS MENTIONED ABOVE.
2) THE GENERAT1C-0. Or $14.4 MILLION IN RETAIL SALES. 3) THE PAIOVIS1ON
�*M
98- 93`
a a
J'J°_ WITH AN �5TIM0.'i PArR(r-; Ov iC:.l - e°.5 VILL10P.. AN--
dl ?��. .r.�.:� _a:.-F=, 'JF r___ r: _ o::'_ -' _ ❑_ �•�_._ A��IV IT 1�: ^_� �
-24-
98- 93"
a 0
C. PJ3-IC FACILI TIF:
c� -
awe-j_E dai l•, w3te- Ce-.a-: Ia3llons)
O'fice area 202,5�
Heel are-
Tcte'
_ :_
04fice area 127,50
l-_te! area 5' 75C
CO �•�,. '�rU�_ 57,5JD
iGt21 241,5b_
3. F_ti",ate_' S: i C -a- e-e,a•ic, fro-. the tctaI Droje_t will be
<, a,-n.al kilo - a— uS37P iT. eit; ate: . 33,55t,K', for the total
Dry ie:t.
h: adj;Tion31 Duhlic education, facilities are ContenDlafed t0 De
ne:essary as a resul* o` this project. The same is true of fire
fa:iIitiet, , equip,%ant, and personnel.
6. Tte de"i:ation of a pe^.e=_trian ea;ement to the City of Miami, as
port of ire E,ayfront/%!;a-! River walk, is conterDlated by the
Applican*.
7. E�timatCJ nee_ fo- 8�ditional police Officers at project com;letion;
eleven officers.
-25-
98- 937
« «
Eva luatio'
I. A- F_LL OCC.PA%C`, Tr•E DEvELOC'T-'E`:- IS PRCJECTE: HAVE A wA_
WATE= rLOW Or 291.561 GALLON' PEZ DAY,
Tniz se.aze •ill be disc',a-ge: int: the Aiani-Cale Water ar:d
Se.-- A,tho-ity cclle:tior cyg+e The Aa+hcrity has indicate:
tt.at i• has the ca.a:ity to acce;` project loadings.
Drainace
I. A PE--Imr?E= CO'_Lr^TICN SYSTEV WILL DIREC' RAINWATER THR1ll'3J.. THE
SI'E A. WP'== WILL RE INJEC'EC INTO THE SALINE. LINDERLvIN"a BISCA`NE
AC; I7EZ, N" _ I' :lrl �.' SJ=fA R'J.='-r I: EX?;_CTEC TC LEAVE THE
The A::!ica- seven IS" dia-,ete- wells with a 24" head
will be reaiirec fo- this disposal syster,. The discharge capacity
o` the entire systew will total 21.0005 gallons pe- minute. These
walls will be I; to 20 feet deep.
A.Cordin: tc the South Florida Water Mana,ement District. detailed
pj;,-;r,_ te_ts mist be performed in order to verify desig- estimateS.
Draina_e system oe,fornance is dependent on how weli the recharge
wells function, and flooring may occur if the wells do not equal
the A;;licant's estir,ates.
-2G-
9 8 - 9 3't
A 0
Hater $uC �;,
ES71M,--Ec THE DEI=__ WU WRAGE A MATrc
The a^o"e ficure is t�sed o^ prciections tha- each office worke'
will use 11 oal./person/day; ho•el ouests, 50 oaf./person/day;
These projections
are t-sed on the Sour. Elorioa 5uifdirr Code. Tote Miari-Dane
A,-.. _,._. A.. --iTy it has the ca:,acit'j tc su�DIY
w a•:••- r_ r-., �..:.�-e-.t, bu' , PviC__ nc sucDO^tirg data.
2, h= ;A.I'. D= 1 h!._ E'-.� __ B1 TH-- ADPLI,r,A`'T IN THIS
,ia-% TC use the la'est Mate- saving
Cevi C}' ir. CC,—e:tl;' wi'h s*c.e- hE•e:s, urinals, lavatories, and
@IB:'r.0 ware^ CO_le"S.
$otid waste
Gr IE.9 TONS (66.53 CUP -IC YARDS)
0° S-I. hA;'E P_;: DAi V A R;SULT Or THIS DEVELO WNT.
Th, r._:.e fi^ure6 are base o•, a •-teration rate for office workers
e� 7` Ics./,rr;on!oay of sclid wastes, 4 Ibs./person/aay for hotel
ou•;,�;; 4 IL../pe s.;r,/dav for condxiniu,^s, and 4 Ibs./personn./day
in retail sfores.
-27-
98- 937
• 0
2. N RC" I'r cv=i.. O^ A A4. _ Av THE A�LICA';-.
O'ILLIM VILOW47TS
A.._A _
;!:- ; a _ C_-: n•_ cc 'e_ ._ , ovicc se -vice
t: the S:Tr io^ the life 01 the pro ;eCt.
Tu: Ac"LICA%T PLAN; TC INCDR=1ORATE I: EK_F;Y CMSE:Z ATION MEASilRrS
S, pwe nz. 5,1 n. .c _ hea-in-! .as dei?P*z inc pact ieaI
I. Tom'- lk—A:- 00. Tn- DA2: CO.1.-Y
The A,;li_a-t e;tirr,tes the total r,u^•per o' school aoe Children in
the Cevel : ne^,+ .ill be 52. Ac.ordinc to the Dade County School
Site olan^ing D�;artrr'.nt, educational taoilities tt0o in existence
can handle this sn�Il incresse in student population.
FF_rrj+ior anC Orar S:+ace
1. T:.� T:' ._^'CA _ A ?; r0'7 EASEMENT TO CONTIVA THE
V;A"I NAB- A4:. CDN%L; IT MITm 5A1, RYJ PARK. NO CTNEF OPEN
OPit; SPACE WILL BE DcDICA'i-D TO THE CITY OR COATY.
-28-
98- 937
i 0
Unless careful a•te -ion is devote tc the relationS�Iip be-ween
fr� a^' the a,: activities it 9a!!
Gci^T. ^�:_lic use cf the ae"icaiec area tea, be discouraged. At
one E."e-w. the s;>ce Cr,:ld be desiane: tc cive the ir--rtssion
tr-.' ! e wa1Kwa, is pa— Of the private area. At the other extreme.
the s.a:c cO.:l:; 6P ..?si_ne: to tc'a•IN se;,arate it frorthe a_joce'a
<:ace. h_'ther ex'-e'+e is aesiraole. The easement area and
Crirc-- space to cesiarez, to alloy vies and
access fro- the c?""2rciai es aii;;ti+^?nts, while fostering appro-
£ __ i s -use.
.-_�Y 6J: ., T.'f= 5.4c AC,_!" Q= TH_ P.:,,;---CT BILL 00v515T OF
:,jA7A7. C :: 04.-WAYS. CO',1pnAQ'?_, A.:
0-- B l SCAYN SAY A% :
T•!: NIA••: PI`.-= lb!__ 5;
COrst-u:tion of the Ball Point project will eliminate a parking lot
which currently disrupts public views and use of Biscayne Bay and
the V;ari River. In its place. the development will be designed to
encouraje peJestrian use of the site at both ground and plaza fevals
am: provide safe public access bordering the Bay and River.
At around level, the proposed 1lia".i River Walk rill be extended in
a pro'.-nade aroun'. the River and flay sides of the project. achieving
98- 937
a 0
a major oDiective of the City's downtown plar.: Connecting the
i
Briar: Rive^ %alh to Ba,trort Par6. If the ConsiJerationS diS-
cussed ir, kl above are incoryorated into the Applicant'& design
o' tCis scare, the pu'.Iic Will be a^c^une cd tc take advar,tage
o' Ba: an: River viers. Snots are alsc planne. or the Bay. Biscayne
a ChJ•ir 'la:. sides c, tr.e iec alon: la-,_scapet
c_.'erB. wdl�.'_�s, any _ss+'ia^ DIa:a$ to encDJ-aoe use
^Ci=, as .ell as _-"_r3 -e .'ria- activities Cr site.
pn tc.- c t')e p^.diu-, a plaza is DrO.')^sec by the
A,-:li_: frc'�^in. ct"_.-a`I+c Da.in=. Ii .ic:, pencnes. and
c 'i^ a a- ove-I-•-): c' c -a, e , is planned wife access
c' =a, views fro- future
view c:,-ridor will bt pro-
Y�..__ _. ir.. , ._ ., i' .',i• _ tC d^,, the .^nJJ-�'i J-
Cui ld orie'':_ nor" - n,a.i-'zi, this view ecrritlor.
Pec<•_'^i3 are C, the A,^;licant to the future people
rr.:�ver statio,. and to fu',Irc• dcveloProent in Dupont Plaza.
While tnc- Dodiur, Will block cer-rair vies of Biscayne Bay frog peJestrians
and ve'.irle_ in D nr Finza, tre a�wniries discussed above should attract t
an: ;rctick. ,Jtlic n=>e'r, TO thr- ,it4 tc take Defter advantage of the
I7a„ FiV •', _ C K �' ._ tunitiel tnar, are Cr('o c'111\
av�il3:iE.
-3_-
I
a 0
Neal r, Care
HE.A:Ti, FA:ILiTI:_ A�.L -r= l --- WITHIN Tr1E cR;,JE:-,
WIT- T-i� ExZ-=71014 Or Al E'•':P,E:D' FA:ILITY IN THE MOTEL.
E,-e-^ iv, ;+rir,t^; hr-!ltr ca-e fa:;lit, es e.is• in the immediate
vi:ir. _ .riE _. .".'.::^r' d': o -S'e• fa:'li'ies d� no'
P�li'c
I. IT l 7, 7— A:,_.-IJ'. PZ)LICE!' MILL BE N=EDED AS
t: a Ie•.te o- private
Fire
I. TH= T_'AL rACILITr WILL g: A`tD Cr!PLY MITP THE
OF Trt= SOJT" FLOniDA 9 t1^IN CODE.
Additional fire vretection ■ill be Drovided by an automatic
fire ala^' sy-!e-., fire p.: .- t: ar em*rgeK� D:rer
syyt,,^, a, an iG-^::USe fire en' Sr.:u-i t\ cortrol eerie-.
-. T,i- CITN' VIAV FI :rA_ Ne' _ •Ih__ THAT N' %-W
FIP rAC'ILITIF`, F;.'I� ";T, Q= '.= ^.`.... A=' PEOLIIREC' AS A RESUIILT
0, TAIS CSrL5"•. .
-31-
98- 93-7
I
r ♦'
Hz).eve the C: +,, o+ w' 3 i rE f CL`t nEr• dYfl nC' Dosstss the
n, I— rise ^JiIdin_ C_•ce-zc. =E fD- fire U'.`Ic* is Giace:
hedvi i� o,. sGrih�,ler syste"= ant fife -Proof C..- in terrain
d'e'_ Cl *hE 0 the tuiIdih_.
32-
98- 9j"7
o,•, ,a !,e tne tc losing number of
111 icie a, Ine C, fu I I 9R4
it t- be
in I
ti C, f -f v; !,-rc
el
f ; Hotel - Ur, er-r, i ned
C :7— a-C tC a,- --rate 571 Q'.: trips) of the total A.M.
trips) 0' the tCt3' P.k'.
of trjf#iC;
98- 937
*io*
S: _ :•our." o- 1-?° j?;
• ">,c j or 1-9` i 7S
S: ;couh' or .nC Avenue 9%
S__'�6Cune or G;scay.he Blvd. 101
.....*1,noi or EricKell Ave. 1'3
ions
Ev*lu-ti--
1. E`• 1454, WHEN THE P;ZDJEZ-- IS EX-tCTEC TO BE FULLY OCCIPIED. THE
CA C 1.'Y tiSAtiA _=.= C -IC, EK^tCT_ THAT THE FIRST PHASE OF THE
DA:�E RA-IZ TnAASIT SYSTEV AN: THE DCNT0111. PEOPLE MDYEP WILL BE
S_=. .. T',7 P=!1A«1 AREA. tIA•iJ;1N? A97 ' 30% 0- ALL
T= I = = I •.'. ;�.Jh. tea'..
Tn, t s•a''C- r'6 c^ .ill P-in-'l, serve the develop -+en• is
locate." a.:-ox'mately at 14.0. 2-id
ccr._ a the Flor;da East Cast Ftaitr3a.. The pNP I E nov!► will
lin. this transit station to the site wit►: an alignment penetrating
the middle of the four blocks within Dupont plaza. providing
a station in the northeast corner of the northeast block. This
station will be connecter to the site by weans of a pedestrian bridge
over Biscayne Boulevard. The route aliorments for the Rapid Transit
Sistc*- and Pe:)Ple Rover are depicted in Figures S and 6. respectively.
2. THE APP.ICAt.T W-PURTS THAT THE FOLLOWIN:- INTERSECTIONS IN T11E PRIMARY
PROJi-'T IVPACT AREA ARE NON O'ERATINS AT LESS THAN LEVEL OF SERVICE
(M) C:
- 34.
98- 937
S r Set - t'r
iIGJIRE S
_.s •_rD[f [tilt
20 19
t.{ . IT
� 16
:' •`f 1 IS
04
G y- 4
IS
12
— —Cy'1: WAY 7
r
S:. t
4
3 e`y
2
e`
LEGEND
STAGE 1 SYSTEM
1 - OADELAND SOUTH
It
k.rr. T •vEMUt
2 • DADE;.AND NORTH
12 -
CIVIC CtkTER
S - SOUTH MIAMI
a
it* 21 STREET
4 - UNWERSITY Of M:/MI
14
lge SS STREET
S - LEdEuNE/000GL4S
IS
k* 45 STREET
6 - S w V AVENUE
16 -
MOL%tL CITT
T • VIZCAYA
IT •
k.Ml 65611E9T'
S • BRICKELL •VENUE
IS •
11.M TlSTO tT
9 - GOVERNMENT CEkTER
ISI •
041ALCAN IIRRK
10 - kw • STREET
to.
• B AVENU9
DADE RAPID TRANSIT SYSTEM
- tS-
98— 931
_-
�I was -
_..JI _7(Tf11 IIC-�I
__I -_Al _-1-31 �il_!_JI_l.
X_ jL'Nz\\ X, I j__pl k
JU
, N\�N
14
> 1,
MIAMI DOWNTOWN PEOPLE MOVER SYSTEM
98- 937
Vr
I 4^
A.M. Peak None
P.M. Peak S.E. 2nd Street i) S.E. 2nd Avenue (LOS E+)
S.E. 2nd Street 8 S.E. 3rd Avenue (LOS E+)
3. THE APPLICA%' PROJECTS THAT AT FULL OCR TA4CY OF BALL POINT (1984).
FIVE (5) INTERSECTIONS IN THE PRIMACY PROJECT IMPACT AREA WILL
OP-rRATE AT AN UNACCEPTABLE LEVEL Or SERVICE (LESS THAN C) IN TW
A.N. PEAK HOUR, AN., THREE (3) INTERS=CTIONS WILL QPERATE AT AN UN-
ACCE-'ABLE LEVEL OF SEq�ICE 1% THE P.M. PEAK HOUR. SINCE MANY Or
THESE INTERSECTIONS WILL OPERATE AT LOS F, IT CAN BE EXPECTED
THAT AOJITIONA_ NEARBY INTERSECTIONS, THEORETICALLY OPERAIIN' AT AN
ACCEPTABLE LEVE, Of SERVICE, WILL ACTUALLY OPERATE AT A LOWER LEVEL
Or SERVICE. SjZH TRArrI^ C„DI '10": WO'J:D SERVE TO INCREASE THE
CC:T Or ENTERII); AN:, LEAVI'i_ D:iW%70r:'. MIAMI, REDUCING- ITS A=-rSSi-
BiLITY TO THE R ,T Or THE RE fD% , A%_, INCREASING THE COST Or BUSINESS
C:,z; TIC.; 1% 7-_ A. _°.
See Figure 7 for the er;ecte� 1984 roadway system in the primary pro-
ject impact area. Tables 7 and 8 below summarize the Intersections
expected to operate at a poor level of service in 1984.
TABLE 7
Inter:;e,;tions Operating at Unacceptable Level of Service
1984 A.M. Peak Hour
Intersection
S.E. 3rd Street d S.E. 2nd Avenue
Biscayne Blvd. Way & S.E. 2nd Ave.
S.E. 3rd Sire.-t & S.E. 3rd Avenue
S.E. 2nd Street 8 Biscayne Blvd.
S.E. 3rd Street R Biscayne Blvd.
-37-
level of Ser_v{ce
TOfet TreffiC
Eiac karNrjC TreffIC flnel. Bell Point)
C E
D+ D
A D
A DI,
B+ D
98 9317
E:
j - 4=--
lil r r
N
I
31d ST. -.Z.-P 9 a-L
`
W
2
CMV*
\KAU
i1
J
6%U& tJWAr-
A �MN�iI M�iapo�r
1984 ROADWAY SYSTEM
TABLE 8
I• ^s 'ar.er, - -• 'ce; �� Lew G• Se►vice
Leve' of Se -vice
Totai Traffic
Tra•fic (Intl, ball Pcint)
S.r. ?nz _tree, d -.E. 2nd Avenue r F
�' . & _.-. fir- Avenue D• E
�._. 2r� Blvd. r
w ile mangy of tr- aDOve intersez*;o-s a-e exnec*e� to be con0estec
in 1954 as a revolt of ba2�yrounr traffic alonew several intersections
c r r!e e!� tree• cow, ►ne- oell Flint traffic is adae^_. In the P.M.
S.E. _n, _'reef reaKs aJw De -wee S.E. 2nd
n ve-..P ar: °;..avre SJt:���arc, the primary route for traffic leaving
the ci-e.
I ry rJ�?^+"its '.c tna [,,, ,c F;aza area are not c.:'rently programed,
De' are in the planriny steoes. The Florida Department of Transportation
(FDJT) is consiaerin; improvea*:nts to the 1-95 Connector into Dupont
Fla -a, as well as aczitional access across the Miami River. Public
hearinas or the alternatives are scne7uled for July. but completion
of these'. ir.przwvr eats is not articipated by FDOT until between 1906
and 199:. T.c of the improver.ants under consideration, i.e.. widening
the bricKell gridce to 6 lanes an! constructing flyover ramps from the
1-95 Connector to Eiscayne Blvd. May and S.E. 2nd Street near 8iscarne
BJ.:levard, were modeled intc the future roadway network by the Applicant
and it was shown that an ultimate solution is possible.
- 39-
98 93"d
I 4^
C IN 195= IS B=ICKELL AV--N NEA= S.E. 127n STREET IN THE P.r.
C1. LE;: T-A', 1:1 C= T,I- TrLA='IC IS 5E\c9ATE: By
?AFL PJINT,
E. C';; 0. THE ALTfR'•ATIVE DJPD';T PLAZA IMIIR'VEVE%TS EEIN" CONSIDERED
2Y FDDT IS A NEw "ELKS SOUTH" SPIDGE ACn:S THE MIAVI RIVED, EAST
Or THE 0J-'Y.7 PLAZA H;,TF, C74NECTIN; BISCAYNE BO'JLEVAR` AN BRICKELL
A`: EN E SO -'TN 0= D'_'l" . PLAZA. IF THIS ALTER.AT I VE IS C►+OSE%. A
STRIP 07 LAND IN THE SO'JTHwEST SECTION Or THE SITE WILL BE NEEDED
F0- THE Iti'= _.E'•'_`•T.
jr ..o- t' the ^FI-5. SOUt?'." OCtiOr for a M.ia-+i River cross-
ink, the la Iccs e_ rr[• a^C soutn of the eKtensior of the eastern
i, T,i_ A=-:1i_AYT P:tJ=J:E: THA' FA;:... -SIN-- ON Cr17PIN PLAZA BE REMOVED TO
A=J!'J_,4TE TRAcFIC IYHIO- WILL USE CHOPIN PLAZA FOR ACCESS TO THE_
HJTEL. THE A;'PLICANT AND THE OFF-STREET PARKING AUTHORITY ARE NEaO-
T I A' 1 %—" .A'. RE JARD I N _' C016!?ENSAT I ON TO THE AUTHORITY FOR THE
LC. S OE Pc-VF';7E AND!OG PAR -:IN? SUPPLY. APPROXIMATELY 50 PARKING
SPACES, MANY OF V-flCH ARE USED BY VISITORS TO BAYFRONT PARK. INCLUDING
THE BA%D SHF LL, MOJLD BE REMOVED. UNLESS AN AGREEMENT IS REASiD.
THE VIAAILITY OF THE HOTFL COULD eE AFFECTED DUE TO THE LACK OF
DIRECT PUPJ C ACCESS. A%D THE USE OF BAY;7"T PARK SY THE REGION WAY
PE 01 C7JkA,ED.
-41-
98- 937
r r
R:��u'rfc a-.-ers to the hc!e1 must to provioet. There is About K^1
o, ric-0!-.34 in Cho;,Cle:t, C� w',.r 24' (TwC traffic
la -es) is re�:luireC to ha -]le traffic to the hotel. An
tr,cr-fore, be rej-he: be•.ee-. the Applica-.' ane
C'f-;'ra rcrkir,_ A❑th rit; przvidin: for tw: traffic lanes un-
_. _ ^uCtPJ t`. GA wi" r.:..2^�•'.�_ or C^.777n To a^stJ-E aL'e-,3!e
tc PO-n, su:" d^ R;,' •-^7-! sho„IC also provi Oe for an
a:P •J!@ dr n! o4 pa,.in7 in fr.i Pih:a area. COSt of necessary im-
pr_�•_r.. er.0 loss of Auth:.''!s re:enus, if any, should be borne
C. tr: A::w',:, w _'_ :f r- L "Ef iC iary o• such chanties.
EA IMRT ,Y SPACES W;LL BE
14' 1: Ex _S E" T,_ A=-.!CA'.'73 HA�r L!- _-17EC7 UPON TRAkEL
Tv Tnc DDr,'. -.a'. AR ---A DBE TL •:n_ CC:_TRXT13% OF THE RAPID TRANSIT
SYSTEM AS-. Pi_OPLE
9. 25tS PA;KIN' SPACES WILL B-r PR3':1D_D WITHIN THE PROJECT FOR BALL POINT
EMPLC`'EE`_, RESIDENTS, At.: VISITOi?S. OF THESE, THE AP?,ICANT PR, -POSES
1 605 SELr-PA^-KIN- SPACES FOR, CD'.D't':IUf' USE, SEPARATED F" THE OTH£R
i
I
j PA:WIN? AREAS.
Farking for other than con,f,'.miu• use appears adequate; however, 1.4
self -parkin_ s?d:es per dwallinc unit is low. Based on Dade County
Zoning Coon stancara_, this project needs 863 condominium parking
-Q2
98- 937
r 01r,
w ages to ac�.ocrocate 5C^ dwelling units, i.e., the proje_• is 161!
s:a:e: deficient usin; se!f-porminc. A lack of perking for residential
use c0_I: a'fect the saleatility of condominiwms. However, if the
AD^IiCd•.t were tC emDlOy vale' parking and design the condomin;wm
D67..in^y fa:ilities a:=ordin ly, 2✓-3, percent more parkin_ spaces
c3,!,4 De O:tsineG fro* tr,e s2�-c area, making the parkin_ su;,,Iy ede-
Tne Applicant should, therefore, arovide at least 863 condo-
miniu-. parkinc spaces tnroua^� construction of ad':itional sal hparkinyp
tn-ou^n facility redesign,, tnrouz" design for and provision of valet
pa -Kin_, or, a cor:ina*ion c' the a5ove me'nods.
AN- A.,- I Y I TY AR: PLAN'::^ A- SRDJ%- LEVEL ANO IOWA
GE.;_,- _ t'A.O^ FEA-J;_S WILL A WATER_
A.,Oti< EISCA".E SAY AN: THE MIAP"I RIVER, RETAIL SPACE
It. THE FR,%TIN"> ON THE PRO+'EyA7E. A`1: A LA140SM91ED PLAZA ATOP
THE PODILV WITH PEDESTRIAN BRIDGES ACROSS BISCAYNE BOULEVARD TO THE
PE3Pc'c 1+1,':ER AN- DUPONT PLAZA.
With the pede>trian brido-s across Biscayne Boulevard proposed by foe
Applicant, and the current allocation of more than 25 percent of the
traffic signal cycle time to an exclusive pedestrian phase at SiseayM
Boulevard and S.E. 2nd Street, it is anticipated that pedestrian wove-
mcnt between the site and downtown Miami will be handled smoothly end
safely. The City of Miami should. however, wonitor Pedestrian wovewent
-t 3-
98- 93`7
r or.,
across eiscavne Boulevard to anC fror tre sit*, and wok al"
Otne- gcQ,ernme,t ase,cies and/or the Apzl;cart to rwwdv any
pe3es'ria', v-auie^�s rhicr� mion! arise.
-44-
98 - 937
or
Or
J^
I. Nu -tee- of dwelling units DY Price Range. Type, and BeCroO' Cant:
Nu-. e�
c' Be:-oo-s
c-ice n9�?e Stru_ture _y.R
—1
2-
--3
Tot&1 D!s
$1�-ID-13-10919?9 Hia' FiSe
75
C
0
75
E1t,,�-119,999 "
75
0
0
75
SIt ,0'.•-14y,OJ0 "
0
0
5C
50
fl`.O,00�-159,000 "
0
0
50
50
Tc'a
I"
25"
100
500
_. G �.B5id8 tial Oe—ity: 59 C.u./acre
sit): 1" C..../acre
Ev31�'_•iC�
I. THE Ar'DLICA%7, PRO?0 _ TO CONSTRJC- 50^ LUXU=". HICK—P.ISE C(>,LwvIpmw
UNIT IN TW", TOokcRS T," SE LOCATE: AT THE SOUTHERN EDGE OF THE SITE.
2. THE AP-LICATION INDICATES THAT THE SALES PRICE RAMSE WILL K $100.000 •
S15D,070. HON:VER, THE Ao-LICANT BELIEVES THIS PRICE Rk%';E WILL
SLF-' TANTIALLY AS A RESULT OF A MARKET STUOY PRESENTLY IN
3. THE AOOLICA'.- EruECTS THE FA (DRy,)ti• DISTRIB:TIO!. TO BE AS FOLLOWS:
I t -7ra - 3M
2 bej-fro- - S' l
3 b?_'rfo- - 201
-45-
9�37
or r
-- Ol'-7 L I IZ Y RE IA- U-.1 7, S ARE Y3J._
1%4�` , Fv:
7A !:A*.' IN 'E%'- 7:
Pk%-
R.-SID--' Ef"=LOYEIS WILL BE T;kA%S-
%k- z
S-7 LC)-.
1ARL! 9
37.f 4'
Ll .3
t.1
S..., We t": U, 1--t
• 0- V.
3 D.. 14, -4, -.0. S.- M-✓.- level.
t;A'A WLPO:ATIMI
—46-
98- 937
OF OR
PAC7 I I) - p_:,W ND -AT 10'.S
It is 'ne re ende'ior. of the Swtr. Florida Re -,;Ora; Planning Council
tc the City of Miami tha' Ball Pcir• be epproved. Subject to incorporation
cf tre fpllo.in conJitio•s into the Cevelcpment Order:
I. Tie A:;lica— will re:c-t tc the So:tn rlorida Regional Pianrir.:
CCuncii 1r,F res.lt-- cf its marine community survey before procee!in;
or S^3%atl renovation. If via^le marine communities are detected,
the Applicant will incorporate, in its Corps of Engineers permit
a;Giica io ne3,ures tL r.i-iri.e in;.ac' of seawall renovation, on
.nese c-:a-is�s.
2. Frio- r, the A;plicart shall, us,n_ assJmotions
_-i^ �r• ar:-.-.:..: to - -,aye Go.-. Dect. of , 5ffie and
tie So.:tn Florida Regional Flannina Council
prepare an, sunai-, appropriate data and oocumentation affirwe-
tively derprstrntin to the satisfaction of the City Of Miami Public
Works Department ("City"i and the County acceptable interim, ;mnrovemwtS
tc allow roalways to operate at levels of service acceptable to the City
ant the County in the A.M. and P.M. peak hours pending the completion
of final traffic inprovk-w nts. The data and documentation shall also
incluic projection; acceptable to the City, the Council and the County
entaplishiny when inpieRrotation of interim solutions shall be repaired
in whole or in part. Suc+, pro;actions shall be revirwNd annually
-47.
98- 937
/ OR
Ci- t•�c C�.. :,iI er,_ th• Courts. -E A::lica-. shall Pa,, Its
ez_of the cos`. of i►.;;,ntr.-inc the a_-e:Iable irte,i-
crier ,. C. ^/"- it.' C•'ve lc. A;;I ;Car- Sh21I
tat, le t: the, r_'i'. e't •C the CDJnty, suc-
f�,.�?J' I_ c•, d'� bJ'•C tha' with f-fc City or the- Count,.
^ , to P;[l ica^' Shall obtai-- a
co^ritrxrI o- «fie Dart of the City and the C7Jnty to im.le-gent the
t tin•; i-:i,„ted b•. the prC:ections.
a^_ _ 's s-,: I I tc 1z: the CJJncl l and
A�-
,rovaI
:Scav'e 5% levarc
a 7.: .;tc i+all Point traffic:
D r_., ision f::,;r tra'fi_ lanes frog the Southern-r_S' Site a=cesS
poir' tc S.E. 2n^ Street, ren,val of the island near S.E. 3rd Street,
provision, of a traffic sicral at S.E. 3rd Street, and addition of a
sr--_on9 left turn lane northbound onto S.E. Znd Street. If approved
in-erim in;r .:-^-x ts, under 2 above, obviate the need for any of these
icy-ove":--.', SJ_•. inprove-re^,t(S) shall not be rewired.
R. The Ap;licant will re.erve the lan� located west and south of the
care-n riv -cf-way of Eiscayne Boo levare extenoe7, and will dedicate
in;:• Ian: to tnc ap[re;riate gcvern-,ent a7ency if the land Is reeuirN
for COnylrgA ion of a Miami River crossing.
49-
98 - 95ti
The q;.�-iicc-t will an aOreetWnt witt the Cff-5tree• rar►irc
q,''. ,t„ .rode; _ fcr t.: IraffiC lame o- 'o , FIaze U"'etIJ..•e:
p.• .� ,•...•......... to a-t��., .tt:. a-ce t. the n-,•el. .itr. tns
�, �.� ri; -='-+-• nr �n.:i" FI�-- -..- __ t- rar.inc a'-
C. .:I ;can- will Pro, ice a' least the 5:•o-- tne• woulz
^ir- C-•: (Ce C't o- t dtat; f--' e>•cl Us•v! use
mar prpvide sic"
"i, �v .7J'•• _� tr�_rion o' 8L�`i0",�! set►-.^arD.inr facilltiei.
ftw
7.
are_
tc d11:?. VIP.' dc_ dczeSs frog the pr.;ec
P F,1c: li£':^•-'tS, .Li lr f,?_'rrir�; dDC r�:ridTe- pU.`.IIC UStr Gt
^orsi[ilit, fCr r.irtcinin: all sections of the walk rill be specified
E. Ttn A-••I;ca- will in.. r; _ratE all azzl:itinnai intorr.ctior rezj.°SteZ
tltnP SJJ•• Fluri Ce nt,' . n<1 Flannin:: C'%Jr,: i I an:: revisions "bmitteC
i, tn_• 4;; I i... t: on _.inal is ct the kn l ica'IOn
1_i�c.,.i F;, _.Ji i^.t d 0.:+^: IEtr 'L.^•tr• dnc r111 prwi Oe
j. iondl F1Y ❑in_ Coun--i 1, City of Miaml�
Ct'• C_ ^tt a th, _1C1c.
-4;
98- 937
9. The Development Order shall be null and void if substantial Oevelop-
me— C• the site has nc' began within two (2) years of the record*:
date of the Development Order.
10. The Ap,-Hcation for Developmer* Approval Is incorporated by reference
into tee Development Order of the City of Miami as follows:
"tne Application for Development Approval is incorporated
herein by reference and relied upon by the parties in dis-
ceargin� their statutory duties under Chapter 3K, Florida
Statutes. Substantial compliance with the representations
c^ntaine' in the AppliCation for Development Approval is a
conditior for aPprovai unless waived or modified by agreement
a^on! the parties."
-50-
Q
98- 937
ANALYSIS FOR AMENDMENT TO
PREVIOUSLY APPROVED DRI
for the
Ball Point Project (a.k.a. Miami Center I)
CASE NO: 98-043
The requested amendment to a previously approved DRI is for the purpose of allowing an
amendment to the Ball Point Development Order in order to delete a 3.01 acre parcel of
land from the originally approved Development Order. The southern portion of the
property was never developed under the original DRI and is required to officially be
separated from the remainder of the property before it can be developed under the
Downtown DRI or another individual DRI.
The Ball Point Project (a.k.a. Miami Center I) is located along the north bank of the
Miami River at Biscayne Bay and Biscayne Boulevard at 100 Chopin Plaza and
approximately 201-399 S. Biscayne Boulevard (see attached legal description, location
maps and aerial photographs for exact property boundaries).
In determining the appropriateness of the proposed modification, the Department of
Planning and Development has made the following findings:
• It is found that the original DRI for the Ball Point Project was approved in 1979 and
amended in 1080, 1986 and 1990.
• It is found that the 1986 and 1990 amendments are null, void and of no further force
and effect since the southern portion of the property was never developed.
• It is found that the 1979 DRI development order, as amended in 1980 may still be in
effect.
• It is found that the Department of Community Affairs considers the DRI to affect the
portion of land which was never developed; therefore, said portion of land should be
separated from the remainder of the project by a legal instrument prior to the subject
property being developed under a different proposal.
• It is found that the proposed modification to the DRI does not constitute a substantial
modifaction and is not in conflict with the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood
Plan 1989-2000.
98-- 9�7
PZ-2
APPLICANT
HEARING DATE
REQUEST/LOCATION
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
PETITION
PLANNING
RECOMMENDATION
BACKGROUND AND
ANALYSIS
PLANNING FACT SHEET
City of Miami Department of Planning and Development.
September 16, 1998.
Notice of proposed change (NOPC) to previously approved Ball
Point Development of Regional Impact (DRI).
N/A
Consideration of Notice of proposed change (NOPC) to previously
approved Ball Point Development of Regional Impact (DRI).
Approval.
Please see attached analysis.
PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD Approval VOTE: 6-0
CITY COMMISSION N/A
APPLICATION NUMBER 98-043 Item #4
....................................................................................................................................................................................
CITY OF MIAMI • DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
444 SW 2ND AVENUE, 3RD FLOOR • MIAMI, FLORIDA, 33130 PHONE (305) 416-1435
Date:
rage i
98- 93
• It is found that the modification proposed (specifically the separation of the southern
portion of the land which was never developed) will allow the property to be
developed in a manner which will better serve the downtown area.
Based on these findings, the Department of Planning and Development is
recommending approval of the requested modification as presented.
2
98- 937
I
• , • a a : 1 • • • r NI.
ST,
ST
N � r • a • W �
O �
13 N 13 N 17 It N ,
1: a 14 n u /7 / 1, 1 • .
p
a . i : r Z • . , . 3 . , sai
: 1 x • . 7 . a . _
1a 14 1! N I7 1• 1• i I!! la3 .
1= 13 M 1! 14
17 18
19
1 1= 17 14 to11 1 ti a'
z . •
AST m'
FLAGLER
sT. - O
N > r • 1 • • • •! = 1
Q N � W CN.•RTEIr IY
u N I• I• rT • a I . ONE -
t= N U • IT to A. �vJlr' Q Sub. +
S cr r•u7i \t`st <
S.E. •
o SL
u 14 1 r7 27
1• r• I= -rs k 1 r7 N n ti' 31� M -
y truer a S T.
��y t• 1! != 1 10 • •
1 • ! •
1�
o �P MIAMMII 1
r P4` ER
AMENDED g,SCAYME g
_ - \ �. m
LE ARn IMAM :o:• '
TRAcr'c1 � • r
A B C
SRI
pQS
E L � D— 5 � �• eR,cscEtt, � ON _
s - i CLAUGHTON ISLAND
3 o r: C SECTION 2
SECTION 3
6 ' T • ' . 2 ° / / 8 TRACT G PARCEL J. TRACT V
• s 4 7 . ,o • 3 ,
r 0
oT ' ' . �" eRtiC j
•r r= ea 1• ro I• u a ?
j°qRK TIt'P= le,
n O
c a o !J Q ! • ' _ S Nqs` 1 SECTION I TRACT A
4 13 I• ri 1• , • , � I I
El' 8'` ' TRgc q V�
co T 9,17
TRACT 'H'
9 S— 93 r IFI
__...,.....v..,_, w,,. ....-._. .-....._. _.,.. rot
e*�'
w�� "so-*•'. � Y `� ''�
4�'rl�">•c�
bb
98 - 937
Lucia A. Dougherty
579-0603
VIA HAND DELIVERY
Ms. Lourdes Slazyk
Assistant Planning Director
City of Miami Planning Department
444 S.W. 2d Avenue, 3rd Floor
Miami, Florida 33131
WIMU
iNflVBlfi
August 12, 1998
Re: Notice of Proposed Change ("NOPC") to Previously Approved Ball Point
Development of Regional Impact ('[DRI")
Dear Lourdes:
On behalf of the owner, Miami Center Joint Venture and the contract purchaser,
Miami One Centre, Inc. (collectively referred to as the "Applicants"), enclosed is a
Notice of Proposed Change to amend the Development Order approved by the City of
Miami for the Ball Point Project (n/k/a Miami Center 1).
The Applicants are requesting that the Ball Point Development of Regional
Impact ("DRI") development order, as amended, be modified. The Contract Purchaser
of the 3.01 t acre portion of the DRI (Miami Center Joint Venture) is submitting this
request in an abundance of caution, in order to ensure that the property can be
developed pursuant to the City of Miami Downtown Development of Regional Impact
(the "Downtown DRI"). However, the Owner believes that an amendment to the DRI is
not required in order to proceed with development in accordance with the Downtown
DRI and submits this application without waiving its argument that such an amendment
is not necessary. -
The Ball Point DRI was originally approved in 1979 and was subsequently
amended in 1980, 1986 and 1990. Enclosed within the Notification of Proposed
Change are copies of the DRI and all amendments. Based on our review, the 1986 and
1990 amendments are null, void and of no further force and effect. However, in an
abundance of caution, the Applicants seek to remove the southern 3.01 acres (the
"Subject Property") of the DRI from the Ball Point DRI, as amended, and to enable the
Subject Property to be developed in accordance with the City of Miami Downtown DRI
or to allow the Subject Property to ultimately be developed in conformity with an
independent DRI development order. Therefore, the Applicants seek to modify the Ball
Point DRI to delete the Subject Property which is legally described in Exhibit 1" and for
the DRI to continue to run with the northern 5.44 acres which is known as Miami Center
(;HKFNIIF:RG TKA-UKII; HUFF:MAN LIPOFF ROSF.N & QUEN•rrl.. P.A.
1221 BBICKFI.1. AVt.NUE MIAMI. Fi.uitiu:% :33131 305-579-0500 Fax :305-579.o717
MIAMI Nrw YORK WASHINwrON. D.C. 1'nu.,turLrulA SGI P►uto �, � ^
FORT LAubrWIAI.r Wry•r PALM [3 BF:ACII u[.ANuu T. LLAIIAS5F.F: BUI:A HATON 9 •eReU777
RESOLUTION PAB - 62-98
A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL TO A NOTICE OF
PROPOSED CHANGE ("NOPC") TO PREVIOUSLY APPROVED BALL
POINT DEVELOPMENT OF REGION IMPACT (DRI).
HEARING DATE: September 16, 1998
ITEM NO. 4
VOTE: 6-0
ATTEST:
Loa&Slaik, s t Director
Department of Pl 'ng and
Development
98- 937
August 12, 1998
Page 3
shall thereafter have no further force and effect. Exhibit "A" of
this Development Order continues to run with the land.
TO: 29. This Development Order - Exhibit "B" - is expired and is of
no further force and effect. Exhibit "A° of this Development
Order continues to run with the land legally described in Exhibit
3 and is no longer binding upon the land legally described in
Exhibit 1.
We are also submitting the following items with this Application: 1) a list of
property owners located within 375 feet of the 8.46 acre properties; 2) warranty deed of
the Subject Property; 3) a survey of the Subject Property; and 4) two (2) checks
addressed to the City of Miami as follows: a check in the amount of $2,000 to process
the amendment and a check in the amount of $63.00 for notice to the property owners
located within 375 feet of the 8.46 acres, as well as, the property owner of the northern
5.44 acres. Said amount was calculated by multiplying the number of such persons by
$7.00 for the two required hearings.
As required by Section 380.06, Florida Statutes, the NOPC is being delivered to
both the South Florida Regional Planning Council and the Department of Community
Affairs. Pursuant to Section 2105.3 of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, the
requested changes would = constitute a substantial deviation from the approved
development order under Section 380.06, Florida Statutes, and therefore, the
development order may be amended without further compliance with the terms of the
Zoning Ordinance.
Please call me at 579-0603 if there is anything further we need to provide you in
connection with the application, or if you have any questions.
Very truly ours,
Lucia A. ugherty
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Tom Beck, Department of Community Affairs
Ms. Carolyn Dekle, South Florida Regional Planning Council
Mr. Ned Siegel
Jack Peeples, Esq.
Joseph G. Goldstein, Esq.
Adrienne Friesner Pardo, Esq.
MIAMI/PAR DOA/974483/kvwz01 I. DOC/8/12/98
.J' 937
GREENBERG THAURIG
August 12, 1998
Page 2
and legally described in Exhibit "3" of the Notice of Proposed Change ("NOPC"). The
Subject Property is located at approximately 201-399 S. Biscayne Boulevard, Miami,
Florida.
As noted above, we request a change to the 1979 DO, as amended, to have it apply
solely to the portion of the Parent Tract that is legally described in Exhibit "3" of the NOPC
(which effectively deletes the Subject Property from the Ball Point DRI).
In that regard, Section 5 of the 1986 DO Amendment is requested to by modified as
follows:
FROM: Section 5. Exhibit "A" and Exhibit "B" shall be binding upon the
Applicant Miami Center Joint Venture and its successors in interest
as provided herein. Exhibit "A" shall be binding upon the owner of
Miami Center Existing, its successors and assigns.
TO: Section 5. Exhibit "A" and Exhibit "B" are not binding upon the
property legally described in Exhibit 1. Exhibit "A" shall remain
binding upon the property legally described in Exhibit 3.
We are further requesting that Condition 29 of the 1986 DO Amendment, as
amended in 1990, be modified as follows:
FROM: 29. Stay the effectiveness of this Development Order - Exhibit
"B" - if One DuPont Plaza (F/K/A Biscayne Plaza) Phase 1 is not
under construction within three (3) years and three (3) months
from the effective date of this Development Order or by February
21, 1990. "Construction" is defined as the issuance of a
foundation building permit and completion of construction
allowed by the foundation permit; "effective date" is defined as
forty-five (45) days after the issuance of this Development Order
by the Miami City Commission or November 21, 1986. In such
event no development permits thereunto shall be granted, until
such time as an Amended ADA, providing updated information,
is submitted to the Council, City, and State and an Amended
Development Order issued. Should the Development Order be
stayed pursuant to this Condition and an amended Application
for Development Approval as herein provided is not submitted
within one year after such stay is imposed or by February 21,
1991, this Development Order - Exhibit "B" - shall expire and
2 n
CREF:IVRERG TRAURIG 9 8 - 937
CONTRACT PURCHASER
4~
Contract Purchaser
b' AI'Name Miami One Centre, Inc. _
Boca Raton, FI
Mailing Address Blue Lake Management, 5000 Blue Lake, �k150Zip Code 33431
Telephone Number 5 61- 9 9 7 -1 111
Legal Description:
Owner's Name
Mailing Address
Telephone Number
Legal Description:
Owner's Name
See attached Exhibit "1"
Zip Code
Mailing Address Zip Code
Telephone Number
Legal Description: '
Any other real estate property owned individually, jointly, or severally (by corporation, partnership or privately) within
375 feet of the subject site is listed as follows:
Street Address _
None
Street Address
Street Address
Legal Description
Legal Description
Legal Description
98- 937
OWNER'S LIST
Owner's Name Miami Cent@€ Joint Venture _
Mailing Address coo White & Case - 200 S. Biscayne B1vd,Miami, F1 33131-2352
Zip Code
Telephone Number (3 0 5) 3 71- 2 7 0 0
Legal Description: See Exhibit "1"
Owner's Name
Mailing Address Zip Code
Telephone Number
Legal Description:
Owner's Name
Mailing Address Zip Code
Telephone Number
Legal Description: -
Any other real estate property owned individually, jointly, or severally (by corporation, partnership or privately) within
375 feet of the subject site is listed as follows:
Street Address Legal Description
None
Street Address
Street Address
Legal Description
Legal Description
98- 901
DISCLOSURE OF OWNERSHIP
1. Legal description and street address of subject real property:
See attached Exhibit "1"
201-399 S. Biscayne Blvd, Miami, Florida
2. Owner(s) of subject real property and percentage of ownership. Note: Section 2-618 of the Code of the City of
Miami requires disclosure of all parties having a financial interest, either direct or indirect, in the subject matter of a
presentation, request or petition to the City Commission. Accordingly, question #2 requires disclosure of
shareholders of corporations, beneficiaries of trusts, and/or any other interested parties, together with their addresses
and proportionate interest.
Owner: Miami Center Joint Venture
See attached Exhibit 24or Disclosure..
3. Legal description and street address of any real property (a) owned by any party listed in answer to question #2, and
(b) located within 375 feet of the subject real property.
None
Owner or Attorn or Owne
Lucia A. Dougneruy
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF NIIANII-DADS
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 2 day of August
199 8 , by Lucia A. Dougherty who is personally known to me or who has
produced as identification and who did (did not) take an oath.
Name:
Notary Public -State of Florida
Commission No.:
My Commission Expires:
OFFICIAL NOTARY SEAL
MARISOL R GONZALEZ
irARY PUBLIC STATE OF FLORIDA
COMMISSION NO. CC4M"7
ttitISSION EXP. SEPT 17,1998
98-- 937
AFFIDAVIT
STATE OF FLORIDA }
)SS
COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE }
Before me, -the undersigned authority, this day personally appeared Lucia A. Dougherty
who being by me first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and says:
1. That he/she is the owner, or the legal representative of the owner, submitting the accompanying application for
a public hearing as required.by the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, affecting the real property located
in the City of Miami, as described and listed on the pages attached to this affidavit and made a part thereof.
2.: That all owners which he/she represents, if any, have given their full and complete permission for him/her to act
in his/her behalf for the change or modification of a classification or regulation of zoning as set out in the
accompanying petition.
3. That the pages attached hereto and made a part of this affidavit contain the current names, mailing addresses, .
telephone numbers and legal descriptions for the real property of which he/she is the owner or legal representative.
4. The facts as represented in the application and documents submitted in conjunction with this affidavit are true
and correct.
Further Affiant sayeth not.
Applicant's Si
STATE OF FLORIDA Lucia A. q&ou=aherty
COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADS
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this y day of A u g u s t
19 q R , by Lucia A. Dougherty who is personally known to me or who has
produced as identification and who did (did not) take an oath.
O&M� 't �� �Z�
Name:
Notary Public -State of Florida
Commission No.: O FICIAL NOTARY SEAL
My Commission �NOTARY
M:MAR60L R GONZALEZ
PUBLIC STATE OF FLORIDA
COMMISSION NO. CC403667
i MY COMMISSION F.XP. SEPT 17,1998
98- 937
All of Tract D,
Bock 50, Page
D described as
Blccx 1, DU PANT
I!, of the Pubtic
follows:
alinrr I
PLAZA, according ;c t^a Pict L'neraof cs rzccraed in Pict
Recoras cf Cede County, Florida, LESS that port;or of Trace
Begin at the Northeast corner cf sc;d Tract D and rin West aiong the Nor-". !inn of Tract 0
for a d:stcrce of 645.94 feet to a Point c* Curvar::re, thence Southwes.erty a cng a circuiar
curve to ine left, having a radius of 25.00 fees, o centrat angle of 81'26'00" for an arc
distance of 26.81 feet to a Point of Compound Curvature; thence Southerly --long e circ;:icr
curve to the left, having a radius of 3C0.00 feet, c central cngie of 2T34"0" for cn
are distance of 149.57 feet to a point of tangency; tnerce run South for ;-, d!stcnce of 293.50
feet (said last mentioned four courses teing coi Ic:den: witr. The ooundary :fines Of scid Tract 0).
thence rur, i_dst for a distance of 179 41 feet; thence rur, herth for c distance of i 50.G0 Peer:
thence run East for o distance of 525.36 feet; tr,ence rur. Ncrth CC'04'07" 'Nest aiong the East
line of said Tract 0 for a distance of 300.00 ;eei to the Point of Beginning, lying one.
being in Fade County, Flaridc.
98- 90
Exhibit "T
Owner.: Miami Center Joint -Venture is owned by:
Miami Center Joint Venture (-MO ") is the record owner of the property. MCJV has
been &seeded by Miami Center, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability oompaay, pursuant to the
bu*Mtcy order for MCJV. Miami Ceater, L.L.C. is owned by WFP MOV, Inc., a Delaware
corporation and World FhancW Properties, L.P., a Delaware limited partrurship. WFP MCJV is
wholly owned by World Financial Properties, L.P. World Fi ucial Properties, L.P. is owned by
the following parties: (1) Emerald L.P. Moldings, Inc., which is wholly owned by Citibuk N.A.;
(2) Battery Park Pumas, a pwtm3hip of Brookfield Properties Holdings Inc. and Brookfimld
Properties SWWdiuy Corp.; and (3) Broolddd Properties Holdmge, Inc. Chh'b * NA and the
Brookfield Properties entities are pubficly traded companies.
Contract Purchaser: Miami One Centre, Inc. is owned by:
Ned L. Siegel
'°'3 3' 1 %.3 %
Barry W. Florescu 43. i;%3%
Morris L. Stbltz, III 33 1/3%
�100%
98- 937
oD°�v 1.AIIITn_ZI87 /
31
�CM �—UM
TM mTDEMl U, made this .. day of may, 1981,
I between UMOCOYS a. GO= of the Cooaty of Albemarle, State
of virginia, party of the first part, mad ►.SIMX CENTER JC=
9EbtTC88, s Tloridm general pastaership, with a place of
Iiv w*PtN f wrap
bixsiaess at Miami Center, Miami., Florida, party of the second
part,
)SAW
. MSTvLSSETa t
..
That the said pang► of the first part, for and im eon-
_. u
al
sieratigu of the sum of Tea and N0/1.00 Dollars (510.00) and '''►�_-
fS::llq( _
•� ll
otb = good and valuable considsratioas to him in hand paid by tZ
s ; • i the said party of the second part, the receipt wvhereof is �r
_j.. hereby aciasou iedged, -has granted, bargained, and sold to the `".� �
i-gt
-a- -a— said pertr of the second pact, its snecessozs and assigns
==' the foil taro described parcels of laud, situate,' -
- fore4as, oria4
and being 3,u the CounDa ty of de, state of Florida, to vita c
C� c t:
A.0 that certain plot, piece or parcel of land described
ter: on the attached Exhibit A. 51F,.
T0=Mdm NZ= all right, title and interest is and to
iti►ttl any riparian and littoral rights incident thereto. e- `
Zrtc :tltlla.l SOSJF':T TO%. -�
Z i r-OVE 1.* Taxes for 1981 and suhsegasat years.
j ,�. >Ilortgage frame Theodore e. Gould to 01YMia as York
11or3.da Ega3ty Corp., a Florida. corporation, dated �-i'.�t
12/22/80 and recardad'l2/23/30, is.0.8.- Book 10966�
page 2016, Dade county public xacords, and modifi 9
CE ; tion thereto, dated !larch is, 1981, seaarded :•-
. _ tmder -CLerk' f Files, 8I Fo- Dade county
public Records, for prsactpal ba]ame of
$6,500,000.00, and second modification thereto•
of even data harvvith recorded »oiler e1wk's 'pile j
NO. 81-���� her Dads CaaatY Public Records (AN so �.
' modified► ainatter referred to as the •YAwrtgage•)
f M
= from.
Y t � '141 AQOJS
Ut
A R
_ #;►n �► 'WE
�. i+rf Lr' • s �`+� FS PIONEER NATIONAL IMIT S
Ail t.-a jaw } INSURANCE COMPANY
�j et 2600 OouQms Rand. SlalEt 306
No I Reefed {u;f /ism cow Gw9m. FWP48 33134 r G G
98 - 937
11102 P-4 2188
Lots 1 through 1, both 1--save, Of Block 2 (being
the whole of said Block of duPMT PrA21 accord-
inq to the Pict thereof,=2carded Lu plat Book 50,
at Page 11, of the Publi zords of Dadia County,
riorl,da.
To:
1 T4ZGS for 1981 and rsent years*
2. 2"tWICtICUM Set 46u-:, 00" from St- JOS
Paper Ccommmy to Jose A. Force dated 1/29/34
C,
and recorded 2/3/34 under Clerk's File No.
CD-IS8901
C16.
30 She Martgage.
And the said j&M of the first part -does hereby,
spwAally warrant the title to said land, and will defend the
same against the lawful claims of all persons whosoever claim-
rr
Lnq by, through or under him.
)da nano
rt
33 W12SX38 WZz=W, the said party at the first part
has hazwonto set his Hand and seal the day sad year first.
Aba" wriitan.
Signed, Sealed and DOUTGrod
in the Presence Of.,
Sun arArs" )wAiw
COfsSZ Or AMO %P&X'
no foregoing
of
jA der
r- NMA1113
a A 1.
L14
M
was nalmowledg" before as
. . . , 1961, by TXM=BX a.
M
4MM
2-
98
WALTER J. FOEN1AN
City Clerk
November 4, 1998
(11,tt1i of 'fflia T
60,
� uonr auu
Mr. James F. Murley, Secretary
State of Florida Department of Community Affairs
Division of Resources Planning & Management
2740 Centerview Drive
Tallahassee, Florida 32399
Dear Mr. Murley:
DONALD H. AVARSH\1\
Cav ,Manager
Enclosed please find a copy of Resolution 98-937 (with attachments), which was passed
and adopted by the City of Miami Commission at its meeting on September 28, 1998,
which is self-explanatory. This legislation is being forwarded to you for your
information and files.
Since ly,
Walter J. oe 0n,
City Clerk
WJF:yd
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK/ 3500 Pan American Drive/P.O. Box 330708/Miami, FL 33233A3051 250-5360/FAX: (305) 858-1610
(114-#v of 'ffliaznt
\HALTER I. FOEMAN
City Clerk
November 4, 1998
Ms.Carolyn Dekle, Executive Director
South Florida Regional Planning Council
3440 Hollywood Boulevard, Suite 140
Hollywood, Florida 33021
Dear Ms. Dekle:
DONALD H. A4'ARSHA\%
( ity Manager
Enclosed please find a copy of Resolution 98-937 (with attachments), which was passed
and adopted by the City of Miami Commission at its meeting on September 28, 1998,
which is self-explanatory. This legislation is being forwarded to you for your
information and files.
Since ly,
Walter J oe a
City C1
WJF:yd
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK/ 3500 Pan American Drive/P.O. Box 330708/Miami, FL 33233/(305) 250-5360/FAX: (305) 858-1610
OLIT-tij of ffliamT
WALTER I. FOEMAN
City Clerk
November 4, 1998
Ms. Lucia Dougherty, Esq.
1221 Brickell Avenue
Miami, Florida 33131
Dear Mr. Dougherty:
DON:ILD H. \YARSH >\%
Cite Manager
Enclosed please find a copy of Resolution 98-937 (with attachments), which was passed
and adopted by the City of Miami Commission at its meeting on September 28, 1998,
which is self-explanatory. This legislation is being forwarded to you for your
information and files.
Sincer ly,
alter Foe n
City Clerk
WJF:yd
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK/ 3500 Pan American Drive/P.O. Box 330708/Miami, FL 33233/(305) 250-5360/FAX: (305) 858-1610