Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutR-98-0786J-98-678 7/21/98 RESOLUTION NO. 9 8 - 786 A RESOLUTION, WITH ATTACHMENTS, PURSUANT TO ARTICLES 5,9,13 AND 17 OF ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 11000, APPROVING WITH CONDITIONS, A SUBSTANTIAL MODIFICATION TO A MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT (RESOLUTION NO. 98-103) FOR THE TERREMARK BRICKELL II PROJECT IN ORDER TO REPLACE THE PROJECT WITH THE NEW MILLENIUM TOWER PROJECT TO BE LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY 1435-1441 BRICKELL AVENUE, MIAMI, FLORIDA, TO BE COMPRISED OF A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PROJECT WITH APPLICABLE INCREASED FLOOR AREA RATIO BONUSES; DIRECTING TRANSMITTAL OF THIS RESOLUTION AS DESIGNATED HEREIN; MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATING CONCLUSIONS OF LAW; PROVIDING FOR BINDING EFFECT; AND CONTAINING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, on May 8, 1998, Terremark Brickell II, Ltd., a Florida Limited Partnership ("APPLICANT"), submitted a complete Application for an amendment to a previously approved Major Use Special Permit for the Millennium Tower (f.k.a. Terremark Brickell II) Project ("PROJECT") pursuant to Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, Articles 5,9,13 and 17, for the property located at approximately 1435-1441 Brickell Avenue, Miami, Florida, as legally described on "Exhibit All, to be comprised of a planned unit development project with applicable increased floor area ratio bonuses; and WHEREAS, said amendments were found to constitute a substantial modification of the PROJECT and therefore requires JA CONTAINED CITY COM USSION MEETING OF J U L 2 1 1998 Resglution No. 98- 786 City Commission approval pursuant to Article 17 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended; and WHEREAS, the Large Scale Development Committee met on April 22, 1998 to offer its input pertaining to technical issues related to the amendments to the PROJECT; and WHEREAS, the Urban Development Review Board met on June 10, 1997 and recommended approval of the proposed project with conditions as specified on the Development Order; and WHEREAS, the Planning Advisory Board, at its meeting of June 17, 1998, Item No. 4, following an advertised public hearing, adopted Resolution No. PAB 98-53, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS of a modification to a previously approved Major Use Special Permit for the Terremark Brickell II Project subject to APPLICANT complying with all conditions of the modified Development Order for the PROJECT, by a vote of five to zero (5- 0 ) ; and WHEREAS, the City Commission deems it advisable and in the best interest of the general welfare of the City of Miami to issue an amendment to a previously approved Major Use Special Permit and a modified Development Order for the PROJECT as hereinafter set forth; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. The recitals and findings contained in the Preamble to this Resolution are hereby adopted by reference P Mi iM thereto and incorporated herein as if fully set forth in this Section. Section 2. An amendment to a previously approved Major Use Special Permit Development Order, attached hereto as Exhibit "B" and made a part hereof, is hereby approved subject to the conditions specified in said Development Order, per Article 17 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, for the Millennium Tower (f.k.a. Terremark Brickell II) Project (hereinafter referred to as the "PROJECT") to be developed by Terremark Brickell II, Ltd., a Florida Limited Partnership, its successors or assigns, jointly or severally, ("APPLICANT") to be comprised of a planned unit development project with applicable increased floor area ratio bonuses for the property located at approximately 1435-1441 Brickell Avenue, Miami, Florida, more particularly described on "Exhibit All, attached hereto and made a part hereof. Section 3. The modified PROJECT is hereby approved for the construction of up to 243,656 square feet of office space, 199,265 square feet of sports club use, 286 hotel rooms, 140 extended stay rooms and 190 residential units with approximately 11,716 square feet of accessory commercial space and 1,171 parking spaces, subject to the conditions of the Department of Planning and Development and subject to the additional conditions that: 1) in no event shall traffic from the Project exit to 15th Road; 2) the location and configuration of loading docks and service areas adjacent to 14th Lane are not approved as part of this development order; instead, the APPLICANT shall, prior to 3 the issuance of a building permit for the property, work with the Brickell East Association and Point View Association (the "Associations") to find an acceptable location and configuration of the loading docks and service area. In the event the APPLICANT and Associations cannot reach a mutually acceptable agreement, the City of Miami Department of Planning and Development shall negotiate a solution acceptable to both the Associations and Applicant; if the City of Miami Department of Planning and Development cannot negotiate a solution acceptable to the Associations and the Applicant, the city commission shall make the final decision after a public hearing. In no event shall the original option as set forth in the plans presented to the Planning Advisory Board on June 17, 1998, for said service area be an acceptable option. Section 4. The findings of fact set forth below are hereby made with respect to the subject PROJECT: a. The PROJECT is in conformity with the adopted Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000, as amended. b. The PROJECT is in accord with the SD-5 Zoning classifications of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended. c. Pursuant to Section 1305 of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, the specific site plan aspects of the PROJECT, i.e., ingress and egress, parking, signs and lighting, utilities, drainage, preservation of 4 98 - 786 natural features and control of potentially adverse effects generally, have been considered and will be further considered administratively during the process of issuing a building permit and a certificate of occupancy. d. The revised PROJECT is expected to cost approximately $496 million, and to employ approximately 350 workers during construction (FTE); and 480 employees annually (recurring). The PROJECT will generate approximately $8.7 million annually in ad valorem tax revenues to local units of government (1998 dollars). e. The City Commission further finds that: (1) the PROJECT will have a favorable impact on the economy of the City; (2) the PROJECT will efficiently use public transportation facilities; (3) any potentially adverse effects of the PROJECT will be mitigated through compliance with the conditions of this Major Use Special Permit; (4) the PROJECT will favorably affect the need for people to find adequate housing reasonably accessible to their places of employment; (5) the PROJECT will efficiently use necessary public 5 98 - 786 facilities; (6) the PROJECT will not negatively impact the environment and natural resources of the City; (7) the PROJECT will not adversely affect living conditions in the neighborhood; (8) the PROJECT will not adversely affect public safety; (9) based on the record presented and evidence presented, the public welfare will be served by the PROJECT; and (10) any potentially adverse effects of the PROJECT arising from safety and security, fire protection and life safety, solid waste, heritage conservation, trees, shoreline development, minority participation and employment, and minority contractor/subcontractor participation will be mitigated through compliance with the conditions of this Major Use Special Permit. Section 5. The Major Use Special Permit, as approved and amended, shall be binding upon the Applicant and any successors in interest. Section 6. The application for an amendment to a previously approved Major Use Special Permit, which was submitted on May 8, 1998, and is on file with the Department of Planning 3 98- 786 and Development of the City Of Miami, Florida, shall be relied upon generally for administrative interpretations and is made a part hereof by reference. Section 7. This Major Use Special Permit will expire two (2) years from its effective date which is thirty (30) days after the adoption of the herein Resolution. Section 8. The City Manager is hereby directed to instruct the Director of the Department of Planning and Development to transmit a copy of this Resolution and attachment to the developers: Terremark Brickell II, Ltd., a Florida Limited Partnership, 2601 South Bayshore Drive, Penthouse B, Miami, F1. 33133. Section 9. The Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law are made with respect to the Project as described in the Development Order for the Millennium Tower (f.k.a. Terremark Brickell II) Project, which is attached hereto as Exhibit "B" and made a part hereof by reference. Section 10. The amendment to a previously approved Major Use Special Permit Development Order for the Millennium Tower (f.k.a. Terremark Brickell II) Project (Exhibit "B") is hereby granted and issued. Section 11. In the event that any portion or section of this Resolution or the Development Order (Exhibit "B") is determined to be invalid, illegal, or unconstitutional by a court or agency of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall in no manner affect the remaining portions of this Resolution or 7 Development Order (Exhibit "B") which shall remain in full force and effect. Section 12. This Resolution shall become effective thirty (30) days after its adoptions. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 21st day of July , 1998. JOE CAROLLO, MAYOR to accordance with Miami Code Sec. 2-36, since the Mayor did not indicate approvj^l - f this legislation by signing it In the designated place provided, said legislation becomes effective with the elapse of ten (10) days from the date of Commissicri a, -cc - ATTEST : Ong same. W urt the Mayor exercisin rdA ; Walter J. 4EaerfW, City Clerk WALTER J. FOEMAN, CITY' CLE ?ROVE �A$ TU� J LARELLO r TORNEY 83:GMM;csk AND CORRECTNESS :`P/ ` This Resolution shall become effective as specified herein unless vetoed by the Mayor within ten days from the date it was passed and adopted. If the Mayor vetoes this Resolution, it shall become effective immediately upon override of the veto by the City Commission or upon the effective date stated herein, whichever is later. S 98 - 786 EXHIBIT "A" Lots 1 through 23, inclusive, Block 1, together with those alleys located within said Block 1, AMENDED PLAT OF POINT VIEW, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 2 at Page 93 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. Said land lying and being in the City of Miami, Florida. 24812 EXHIBIT "B" DEVELOPMENT ORDER ATTACHMENT TO RESOLUTION NO. DATE: MILLENNIUM TOWER PROJECT MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT DEVELOPMENT ORDER Let it be known that pursuant to Articles 5,-9, 13 and 17 of Ordinance No. 11000, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended, the Commission of the City of Miami, Florida, has considered in a public hearing, the issuance of a Major Use Special Permit to be cQ=rised of a planned unit development project with applicable i n .r ac d f 1 oor ar a ra ; o bon uc _-, for the Trerremark Briekell!I Millennium Tower Project (hereinafter referred to as the "PROJECT") to be located at approximately 1435-1441 Brickell Avenue, Miami, Florida; see legal description on "Exhibit All, attached hereto and made a part hereof; said legal description is subject to any dedications, limitations, restrictions, reservations or easements of record. After due consideration of the recommendations of the Zoning Board and Planning Advisory Board and after due consideration of the consistency of this proposed development with the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan, the City Commission has approved the PROJECT, and subject to the following conditions approves the Major Use Special Permit and hereby issues this Permit: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The proposed Terrefaark BrAek-ell !I Millennium Tower Project is a Planned Unit Development mixed use Eleye__r_"'=.^ Project located at approximately 1435-1441 Brickell Avenue, Miami, Florida; ("PROJECT"). The PROJECT is located on approximately 5.11 gross acres and 3.74 net acres of land (more specifically described on "Exhibit All, incorporated herein by reference). The remainder of the Project's VITAL DATA is attached hereto as "EXHIBIT C" (with a rompariggon tablp b_.ween the original project and the modified plans attached as "Exhibit D"), and incorporated herein by reference. The proposed PROJECT will consist of 372,799 241,656 square feet of office space, 2-4-6 2afi hotel rooms, 180,510 square feet (140 rooms) of extended stay hotel rooms, 199, .6S Gquare feet of sportslhealth club, and 4G 1_90 residential units with ''�T 11,716 square feet of accessory commercial space and 9,64 1_1_U parking spaces. The building will consist of a single 34 2$ story tower; it will also contain a recreation deck of approximately 63,290 64,543 sq.ft. of outdoor space which includes raeefaetb , tennis, basketball, running—traels, lap pool, jacuzzi and an outdoor cafe. The ownership, operation and maintenance of common areas and facilities will be by the property owner or a mandatory property owner association in perpetuity pursuant to a recorded Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions. The Major Use Special Permit Application for the Millennium Tower Project (f_k_a_ the Terremark Brickell II Projectl has a companion application for Special Exceptions as follows: Special Exception with City Commission approval, per Article 6, Section 605.4.3 (1) to allow a drive -through facility for a financial institution; Special Exception with City Commission approval, per Article 9 for a drive -through facility that does not meet the minimum stacking requirements: Reclired* Provided* Lane 1 10 4 Lane 2 8 5 *: Stacking spaces before the Service window. Special Exception per Article 6, Section 605.4.3 (2) to allow a Bar/lounge within the SD-5 district; PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT THE APPLICANT, ITS SUCCESSORS, AND/OR ASSIGNS, JOINTLY OR SEVERALLY, SHALL DO THE FOLLOWING: 1. Meet all applicable building codes, land development regulations, ordinances and other laws. 2. Provide a list of agencies from which approvals and/or permits must be obtained prior to initiation of development and the permit or approval required of each. 3. Allow the Miami Police Department to conduct a security survey, at the option of the Department, and to make recommendations concerning security measures and systems; further submit a report to the Planning Department, prior to commencement of construction, demonstrating how the Police Department recommendations, if any, have been incorporated into the PROJECT security and construction plans, or demonstrate to the Planning Director why such recommendations are impractical. 4. Provide a letter from the Department of Fire -Rescue indicating APPLICANT'S coordination with members of the Fire Plan Review Section at the Department of Fire -Rescue for the review of the scope of the PROJECT, owner responsibility, building development process and review procedures, as well as specific requirements for fire protection and life safety systems, egress, vehicular access and water supply. 5. Provide a letter of assurance from the Solid Waste Department that the PROJECT has addressed all concerns of the said Department. 6. Prepare a Minority Participation and Employment Plan to be submitted to the City's Director of Minority and Women Business Affairs for review and comments, with the understanding that the City's Minority/Women Business Affairs and Procurement Ordinance No. 10538 is a guide that the APPLICANT must use its best efforts to follow. 7. Prepare a Minority Contractor/Subcontractor Participation Plan to the City's Director of Minority and Women Business Affairs for review and comment, wit the understanding that the City's Minority/Women Business Affairs and Procurement Ordinance No. 10538 is a guide that the APPLICANT must use its best efforts to follow. 8. Record in the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, a Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions providing that the ownership, operation and maintenance of all common areas and facilities will be by the property owner or a mandatory property owner association in perpetuity. 9. Record a certified copy of the development order with the Clerk of the Dade County Circuit Court specifying that the Development Order runs with the land and is binding on the Applicant, its successors, and signs, jointly or severally. 10. Provide the City with an executed, recordable unity of title or covenant in -lieu of unity of title agreement for the subject property; said agreement shall be subject to the review and approval of the City's Law Department. 11. Provide the Public Works Department of the City of Miami with plans for proposed sidewalk and swale area improvements for their review and approval prior to the issuance of a building permit. 13. Provide the Department of Planning and Development with a temporary parking plan which addresses construction employee parking and temporary parking arrangements for the existing building during the construction period; said plan shall be subject to the review and approval by the Department prior to the issuance of any building permits. 14. The -applieant shall werk with staff- te the I build-ing's—eeppinge-lement in an effert to ensure that t final result is tyre -nest eemplefaeataEy to the prepesed 11IN• ti • , shall be considered sufficient for the subordinate permits and referenced above. The Project shall be constructed substantially in accordance with plans and design schematics, including the landscape plan, on file prepared by Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Gary Edward Handel F. Associates and the Office of Dan Kiley datedOetebe= -199-:7 May/June 1998, said design and landscape plans may be permitted to be modified only to the extent necessary to comply with the conditions for approval imposed herein; all modifications shall be subject to the review and approval of the Director of the Department of Planning and Development prior to the issuance of any building permits. The PROJECT conforms to the requirements of the SD-5 Zoning Districts, as contained in Ordinance No. 11000, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended. The existing comprehensive plan future land use designation allows the proposed mix and intensity of commercial and residential uses. 98 - 786 The Major Use Special Permit Application for the MillPnni»m Tower Project (f_k_a_ the Terremark Brickell II Projectl also encompasses the following lower ranking Special Permits: CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT per Article 9, Section 915.2 for a Federal Aviation Authority clearance letter; CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT per Article 9, Section 917.1.2 for Valet Service; CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT per Article 9, Section 906.9 for Pool/Outdoor Recreational Area; CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT per Article 9, Section 923.4 for replacement of one (1) 12x35 loading berth with two (2) 10x35 loading berths; CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 6, Section 605.3., for new construction in the SD-5 Zoning District; CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 908.2. for access from a public street with widths greater than 25 feet; CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 6, Section 605.5 (2), for outdoor service of food/drink/shelter; Pursuant to Articles 5, 9, 13 and 17 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, approval of the requested Major Use Special Permit 98 - 786 iF • ' • • .. 011 INIZ14". I1 1 ' • 11 ' / • ' / • / • 1 • THE CITY SHALL: 1. Subject to payment of all applicable fees due, establish the effective date of this Permit as being thirty (30) days from the date of its issuance with the issuance date constituting the commencement of the thirty (30) day period to appeal from the provisions of the Permit. The Terrexaar-Irc Brrelfell I -I Millennium Tower Project, proposed by the applicant, Terremark Brickell II, Ltd., a Florida Limited Partnership, ("Applicant"), complies with the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000, is consistent with the orderly development and goals of the City of Miami, and complies with local land development regulations and further, pursuant to Section 1703 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000: (1) the PROJECT will have a favorable impact on the economy of the City; and (2) the PROJECT will efficiently use public transportation facilities; and (3) the PROJECT will favorably affect the need for people to find adequate housing reasonably accessible to their places of employment; and (4) the PROJECT will efficiently use necessary public facilities; and (5) the PROJECT will not negatively impact the environment and natural resources of the City; and (6) the PROJECT will not adversely affect public safety ; and (7) the public welfare will be served by the PROJECT; and (8) any potentially adverse effects of the PROJECT will be mitigated through conditions of this Major Use Special Permit. The proposed development does not unreasonably interfere with the achievement of the objectives of the adopted State Land Development Plan applicable to the City of Miami. Pursuant to Section 1305 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, the specific site plan aspects of the PROJECT i.e., ingress and egress, offstreet parking and loading, refuse and service areas, 98- 786 signs and lighting, utilities, drainage and control of potentially adverse effects generally have been considered and will be further considered administratively during the process of issuing individual building permits and certificates of occupancy. 98- 786 EXHIBIT C TERREMARK BRICKELL II N/K/A MILLENNIUM TOWER Amendment To MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT Project Data Sheet 1. Legal Description 2. Address: 3. Zoning Classification: 4. Lot Area: Gross Area Net Area 5. Density: Units/Acre Allowed Units/Acre Provided 6. Allowable Area: Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 7. Loading Berths: Lots 1 through 23, inclusive, block 1, together with those alleys located within said Block 1, AMENDED PLAT OF POINT VIEW, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat book 2 at page 93 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. Said land lying and being in the City of Miami, Florida. 1441 Brickell Miami, Florida City of Miami SD-5 5.11 acres or 222,854 sq. ft. 3.74 acres or 162,989 sq. ft. 500 units/acre 37 units/acre 4.25 allowed 6.11 provided with request of PUD and bonuses Required: 6 loading berths: 2 loading berths 12 ft. x 55 ft. x 15 ft. 4 loading berths 12 ft. x 35 ft. x 15 ft. Provided: 2 loading berths 12 ft. x 55 ft. x 15 ft. 2 loading berths 12 ft. x 35 ft. x 15 ft. 2 loading berths 10 ft. x 35 ft. x 15 ft. 98- 786 Project Data Sheet (Cont.) 8. Height: No height limitation Tower 900 ft. Provided Parking Structure 67 ft. Provided 9. Building Footprint: 128,824 SF 10. No. Of Parking Spaces: 658 minimum/ 1403 maximum required 1059 provided Handicapped spaces 13 minimum/28 maximum required 24 provided 11. Open Space: 33,428 sq.ft. required (15%) 107,377 sq.ft. provided (48%) 12. Setbacks: Brickell 30 ft. required 30 ft. provided 14`h Terrace and 15 ft. required 14`h Lane 15 ft. provided r Exhibit D MUSP Comparison MUSP APPROVED BY MUSP AMENDMENT MUSP AMENDMENT RESOLUTION 98-103 (additional) (total) SUBMITTED ON MAY 8,1998 Development Multi -Use office, PUD designation Resolution 98-703 plus residential, retail and hotel as per Increased Development Bonus additional requests Resolution 98-103 Class II Special Permit for reduction of size of 2 loading berths Approval of Millennium Tower plans dated May 8, 1998 Approval of 963 parking spaces Approval of additional 188 1,059•spaces parking spaces MUSP Application for approval MUSP Application for of PUD approval of PUD MUSP Application for MUSP Application for increased development bonus increased development (as per Section 914) bonus (as per Section 914) Special Exception to allow a drive- same Special Exception to thru facility for financial allow a drive-thru facility institutions for financial institutions Special Exception for drive-thru same Special Exception for facility that does not meet drive-thru facility that stacking requirements does not meet stacking requirements Special Exception for Bars/Lounge same Special Exception for Bars/Lounge Class II for reduction of loading Reduction of size of 1 loading Reduction of size of 2 berths berth from 12 ft. x 35 ft. to 2 loading berths from 12 loading berths 10 ft. x 35 ft. ft.x35ft. to .10ft.x35ft. Class II Permit for hotel, office Class II PbrrVii:for hotel, and hotel signage office and hotel.signage Class II Permit for access from a same Class II Permit for access public street with widths greater from a public street with than 25 feet widths greater than 25 feet MUSP APPROVED BY MUSP AMENDMENT MUSP AMENDMENT RESOLUTION 98-103 (additional) (total) SUBMITTED ON MAY 8,1998 Class II Special Permit for new same Class II Special Permit for construction in the SD-5 District new construction in the Sd-5 District Class II for outdoor service of same Class II for outdoor food/ drink/shelter service of food/ drink/shelter Class I Permit FAA Clearance same Class I Permit for FAA Clearance Class./ Permit for Valet Service same Class I for Valet Service Class I Permit for same Class I Permit for Pool alRecreational Area Pools/Recreational Area Zoning District SD-5 SD-5 SD-5 Net Lot Area 168,989.56 sq.ft. same Net Lot Area 168,989.56 sq.ft Net Lot Dimensions 588 ft.6in. x same Net Lot Dimensions 588 290ft. ft.6in. x 290ft. Gross Lot Area 222,854.12 sq.ft. same Gross Lot Area - (5.1 acres) 222,854.12 sq`.ff. (5.1 acres) Open Space 33% (75,612.72 additional 15% (31,720.28 48% (107,377.00 sq. ft.) sq.ft.) sq.ft.) Building Footprint 116,396.68 additional 12,427.32 sq.ft. 128,824.00 sq.ft. sq.ft. Gross FAR 4.25 permitted FAR 3.34 provided additional FAR 2.77 FAR 6.11 provided 723,891.15 sq.ft. 638,558.58 sq.ft. 1,362,450.00 sq.ft. Project Gross Square Footage 353,766.35 sq.ft. additional 944,831.65 sq.ft. 2,444,126.00 sq.ft. Bldg. Frontage: Brickell 260ft. less 20 ft. 240 ft. 14" Terrace 543 ft. 5 in. less 85 ft. Sin. 458 ft. 141" Lane 543 ft. 5 in. less 85 ft. 5 in. 458 ft. Building Height 577 ft.1 in. additional 322 ft.11 in. 900 ft. Parking Structure Height 73 ft. less 8 ft.5 in. 67 ft. 5in. 98- 786 MUSP APPROVED BY RESOLUTION 98-103 MUSP AMENDMENT (additional) SUBMITTED ON MAY 8,1998 MUSP AMENDMENT (total) Setbacks:— Brickell 30 ft. 14" Terrace 15 ft. 141" Lane 15 ft. same Brickell 30 ft. 14`" Terrace 15 ft. 141" Lane 15 ft. Hotel: 246 rooms additional 20 rooms 286 rooms Office: 372,799.00 sq.ft. less 129,143.00 sq.ft. 243,656.00 sq.ft. Residential: 40 units additional 150 units 190 units Phillips Club: 0 new 180,510.00 sq.ft. (140 units) 180,510.00 sq. ft. (140 units) Recreational Facility: 0 (Sports & Health) new 199,265.00 ft. 199,265.00 sq.ft. Retail: 18,822.00 sq-ft. less 7,106.00 sq.ft. 11,716.00 sq.ft. Rec Deck: 63,290.00 sq-ft. additional 1,253.00 sq.ft. 64,543.00 sq.ft. Parking: 963 spaces I additional 188 spaces 1059 spaces F: \LAND PLAN\Mi1lenwm\com0anson2.w0o iv 98- 786 PZ-8 PLANNING FACT SHEET APPLICANT Lucia Dougherty, Esq. for Millennium Tower. HEARING DATE June 17, 1998. REQUEST/LOCATION Proposal for an amendment to a previously approved Major Use Special Permit for Terremark Brickell II Project located approximately on 1441 Brickell Avenue. LEGAL DESCRIPTION Complete legal description on file with the Hearing Boards Office PETITION Consideration of an amendment to a previously approved Major Use Special Permit for the Terremark Brickell 11 to allow a hotel component with 286 guest rooms; an extended stay component with 140 units; a Sports Club component with 199,265 square feet; a residential component with 190 residential units; an office component with 243,656 square feet and, a retail component with 11,716 square feet and a total of 1,171 parking spaces. PLANNING Approval with conditions. RECOMMENDATION BACKGROUND AND See attached analysis. ANALYSIS PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD Approval with conditions CITY COMMISSION N/A APPLICATION NUMBER 98-032 VOTE: 5-0 Item #4 ...................... .................................................................................................................. ....... ............................. ....... ..................... ............................... : CITY OF MIAMI - DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT 444 SW 2"D AVENUE, 3R11 FLOOR - MIAMI, FLORIDA, 33130 PHONE (305) 416-1435 :.........................................................._...................•-•-•-......•--....................---...........: Date: 06%25/98 Page 1 98_ 786 ANALYSIS FOR A Modification to a previously approved MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT fo r TERREMARK BRICKELL II PROJECT located at 1435-1441 BRICKELL AVENUE in order to replace it with the MILLENNIUM PROJECT CASE NO: 98-032 The requested modification to a previously approved Major Use Special Permit application is for the purpose of allowing the Terremark Brickell II project to be replaced with the Millennium Tower Project; the modified Millennium Tower project shall consist _-of a Mixed Use Development comprised of the following uses: Office: Residential: Hotel: Extended stay hotel: Retail: Recreational facility (Sports Club): Recreational Deck: Parking: 243,656 sq. Ft. 190 units 286 rooms 180,510 sq. Ft. (140 rooms) 11,716 sq. Ft. 199,265 sq. Ft. 64,543 sq. Ft. 1059 spaces Note: See the attached MUSP Comparison Table for specific listing of modifications from previously approved project. The project will be located at approximately 1435-1441 Brickell Avenue (see attached legal description, location maps and aerial photographs for exact property boundaries). Pursuant to Ordinance 11000, as amended, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami. Florida, the subject proposal incorporates the following new subordinate special permits: • Class II Special Permit for signage (Article 6, Section 605.3). • Class II Special Permit for reduction of size for 1 loading berth from 12 ft. X 35 ft. to 2 berths at 10 ft. by 35 ft. (Article 9). Pursuant to Article 13 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, approval of the requested Major Use Special Permit modification shall be considered sufficient for and inclusive of the subordinate permits referenced above. In determining the appropriateness of the proposed modifications to the project, the following findings have been made: • It is found that the proposed mixed use development project will benefit the Downtown District by creating a new residential, hotel and office use along Brickell Avenue to serve Downtown area businesses, travelers and visitors. The associated recreational facility will also be beneficial to downtown by providing a unique indoor recreational setting available to the public. • It is found that the project is well -designed and complements the scale and character of the Brickell Avenue area. The project will enhance the subject property and will significantly improve the appearance of the area by enhancing the Brickell Avenue corridor. • It is found that the Large Scale Development -Committee (LSDC) has recommended approval of the proposed project (with conditions incorporated herein) at its meeting held on April 22, 1998. • It is found that the Urban Development Review Board (UDRB) has recommended approval of the proposed project at its public meeting held on June 10, 1998. • It is found that due to the increased development program proposed for the site, and the narrow width of SE 14' Lane, there may be a potential adverse effect associated to traffic impacts from this project on existing developments currently using SE 14`h Lane. • It is found that due to the increased number of uses being incorporated into this project and the proposed design solution which situates each of the separate lobby areas off of one central motor court area, there is a potential for confusion among patrons arriving to the site; a complete directional signage plan should be prepared to address this issue. • It is found that with respect to all additional criteria as specified in Section 1305 of Zoning Ordinance 11000, the proposal has been reviewed and found to be adequate. Based on these findings, the Department of Planning and Development is recommending approval of the requested Major Use Special Permit with the following conditions: 1. The approval of this Major Use Special Permit shall be subject to the recordation of the following documents prior to the issuance of any building permits for the proposed project: 2 9 786 a. Unity of Title or covenant in lieu thereof providing that the ownership, operation and maintenance of all common areas and facilities will be by the property owner or a ._mandatory property owner association in perpetuity. b. Development Order specifying that the Development Order runs with the land and is binding on the Applicant, it successors and assigns, jointly or severally. 2. The applicant shall be responsible for working with the Department of Planning and Development to mitigate any traffic impacts associated with this project on existing developments currently using SE 14`h Lane; this may include adding a lane from the access point of the project to Brickell Avenue to increase capacity, limiting egress to right turns only, or any other solution which will mitigate the traffic impacts; a final mitigation plan shall be subject to the review and approval of the Department of Planning and Development. 3. The applicant shall submit a parking plan for construction employees while the new building is under construction; said parking plan shall be subject to. review and approval by the Department of Planning and Development prior to the issuance of any building permits. 4. The applicant shall prepare a complete directional signage plan for the main motor court area which clearly depicts the lobby areas and access points for each of the proposed uses. 5. The applicant shall provide plans for proposed sidewalk and swale area improvements prior to the issuance of a building permit; said plans shall be subject to review and approval by the Public Works Department and the Department of Planning and Development. 6. The applicant shall retain the services of an archeological consultant who will be responsible for conducting archeological monitoring of all ground disturbing activity; said consultant shall obtain a scope of work from the Miami -Dade County Archeologist and shall provide reports both to that office and the City of Miami Preservation Officer. 7. This approval shall also be subject to all additional conditions specified in the Final Development Order for the project. 3 Exhibit A MUSP Comparison MUSP APPROVED BY MUSP AMENDMENT MUSP AMENDMENT RESOLUTION 98-103 (additional) (total) SUBMITTED ON MAY 8,1998 Development Multi -Use office, PUD designation Resolution 98-103 plus residential, retail and hotel as per Increased Development Bonus additional requests Resolution 98-103 Class II Special Permit for reduction of size of 2 loading berths Approval of Millennium Tower plans dated May 8, 1998 Approval of 963 parking spaces Approval of additional 188 1,059•spaces _ parking spaces MUSP Application for approval MUSP Application for of PUD approval of PUD MUSP Application for MUSP Application for increased development bonus increased development (as per Section 914) bonus (as per Section 914) Special Exception to allow a drive- same Special Exception to thru facility for financial allow a drive-thru facility institutions for financial institutions Special Exception for drive-thru same Special Exception for facility that does not meet drive-thru facility that stacking requirements does not meet stacking requirements Special Exception for Bars/Lounge same Special Exception for Bars/Lounge Class II for reduction of loading Reduction of size of 1 loading Reduction of size of 2 berths berth from 12 ft. x 35 ft. to 2 loading berths from 12 loading berths 10 ft. x 35 ft. ft.x35ft. to 10ft.x35ft. Class II Permit for hotel, office Class II Pergiii:for hotel, and hotel signage office andhotel,signage Class II Permit for access from a same Class II Permit for access public street with widths greater from a public street with than 25 feet widths greater than 25 feet MUSP APPROVED BY MUSP AMENDMENT MUSP AMENDMENT RESOLUTION 98-103 (additional) (total) SUBMITTED ON MAY 8,1998 Class II Special Permit for new same Class II Special Permit for construction in the SD-5 District new construction in the Sd-5 District Class 11 for outdoor service of same Class II for outdoor food/ drink/shelter service of food/ drink/shelter Class I Permit FAA Clearance same Class I Permit for FAA Clearance Class, I Permit for Valet Service same Class I for Valet Service Class I Permit for same Class I Permit for PoolsiRecreational Area Pools/Recreational Area Zoning District SD-5 SD-5 SD-5 Net Lot Area 168,989.56 sq.ft. same Net Lot Area 168,989.56 sq.ft Net Lot Dimensions 588 ft.6in. x same Net Lot Dimensions 588 290ft. ft.6in. x 290ft. Gross Lot Area 222,854.12 sq.ft. same Gross Lot Area - (5.1 acres) 222,854.12 Off. (5.1 acres) Open Space 33% (75,612.72 additional 15% (31,720.28 48% (107,377.00 sq. ft.) sq.ft.) sq.ft.) Building Footprint 116,396.68 additional 12,427.32 sq.ft. 128,824.00 sq.ft. sq.ft. Gross FAR 4.25 permitted FAR 3.34 provided additional FAR 2.77 FAR 6.11 provided 723,891.15 sq.ft. 638,558.58 sq.ft. 1,362,450.00 sq.ft. Project Gross Square Footage 353,766.35 sq.ft. additional 944,831.65 sq.ft. 2,444,126.00 sq.ft, Bldg. Frontage: Brickell 260ft. less 20 ft. 240 ft. 14" Terrace 543 ft. 5 in. less 85 ft. 5in. 458 ft. 14" Lane 543 ft. 5 in. less 85 ft. 5 in. 458 ft. Building Height 577 ft.1 in. additional 322 ft. 1 1 in. 900 ft. Parking Structure Height 73 ft. less 8 ft-5 in. 67 ft. 5in. MUSP APPROVED BY RESOLUTION 98-103 MUSP AMENDMENT (additional) SUBMITTED ON MAY 8,1998 MUSP AMENDMENT (total) Setbacks:— Brickell 30 ft. 14" Terrace 15 ft. 14'h Lane 15 ft. same Brickell 30 ft. 14" Terrace 15 ft. 14`" Lane 15 ft. Hotel: 246 rooms additional 20 rooms 286 rooms Office: 372,799.00 sq.ft. less 129,143.00 sq.ft. 243,656.00 sq.ft. Residential: 40 units additional 150 units 190 units Phillips Club: 0 new 180,510.00 sq.ft. (140 units) 180,510.00 sq. ft. (140 units) Recreational Facility: 0 (Sports & Health) new 199,265.00 ft. 199,265.00 sq.ft. Retail: 18,822.00 sq.ft. less 7,106.00 sq.ft. 11,716.00 sq.ft. Rec Deck: 63,290.00 sq.ft. additional 1,253.00 sq.ft. 64,543.00 sq.ft. Parking: 963 spaces additional 188 spaces 1059 spaces F— F :\l AND PLA N\ MiIlRrnum\ comparison 2. wpd 'NIP 98- 786 $ 'o ST a s o I. ° 74 o 1041 o ,• n ��e „ 20 . :1:3 z ° O � S a o° Li. I I F— o° p I �I H u oq rS 0 r , x xx zs 8 6 GgRORf $ S o ST ' O O I_ 6 S° o III ' , f+• I s l. 1 1 x 1 o ti eF,gr f c! I I s I I00 u 7s�,',+,o� FORTE ° 1 89 • S. E• oo T f PROPEP71 o° 4 �f S(� ES r 1 CIMooL zr zz 23 o MU.0 o �$ T. S.E. 13 ST. t� '•c> M4.4 rye ST 1 a° ° • B •� l o 95 x Q - y► a TR4Cr- IOk I 0 1 M a i• zo 100 A ~ s• I t I 0 ° = o ST. - r UcF p a°rR I ,,�.• t x f• n i a s • C u r 1 w • •t u. s Q •� FOR ., �• o f 14 TERR. ° (Y Tq PL42 9s�a 99 �S.F z•z' =e : �� I�r '3` ` O : ` • ,•' UB F COSTA BELLA ° • , 9�' P. • • .'` rR4h4 SUB. SO J f LEGEND MIAMI CITY LIMITS RAILROADS SPECIAL PUBUC INTEREST HISTORIC PRESERVATION �• ��• PEDESTRIAN PATHWAYS 98- 786 RESOLUTION PAB - 53-98 A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A MODIFICATION TO A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT FOR THE TERREMARK BRICKELL II PROJECT IN ORDER TO REPLACE THE PROJECT WITH THE NEW MILLENNIUM TOWER PROJECT; SAID NEW PROJECT TO ALLOW A HOTEL COMPONENT WITH 286 GUEST ROOMS; AN EXTENDED STAY COMPONENT WITH 140 UNITS; A SPORTS CLUB COMPONENT WITH 199,265 SQUARE FEET; A RESIDENTIAL COMPONENT WITH 190 RESIDENTIAL UNITS; AN OFFICE COMPONENT WITH 243,656 SQUARE FEET AND, A RETAIL COMPONENT WITH 11,716 SQUARE FEET AND A TOTAL OF 1,171 PARKING SPACES SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS OF THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT WITH AN ADDITIONAL CONDITION THAT THE LOADING DOCK BE MODIFIED TO DEPICT THE PLANS PRESENTED AT THE PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD MEETING OF JUNE 17, 1998, LABELED AS OPTION "D", AND FILED IN THE OFFICE OF HEARING BOARDS. HEARING DATE: June 17, 1998 ITEM NO. 4 VOTE: 5-0 ATTEST:Y A4 All,*,-1 es Slazyk, Assistan i Department of Planning and Development • ANALYSIS FOR A Modification to a previously approved MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT for TERREMARK BRICKELL II PROJECT located at 1435-1441 BRICKELL AVENUE in order to replace it with the MILLENNIUM PROJECT CASE NO: 98-032 The requested modification to a previously approved Major Use Special Permit application is for the purpose of allowing the Terremark Brickell II project to be replaced with the Millennium Tower Project; the modified Millennium Tower project shall consist of a Mixed Use Development comprised of the following uses: Office: Residential: Hotel: Extended stay hotel: Retail: Recreational facility (Sports Club): Recreational Deck: Parking: 243,656 sq. Ft. 190 units 286 rooms 180,510 sq. Ft. (140 rooms) 11,716 sq. Ft. 199,265 sq. Ft. 64,543 sq. Ft. 1059 spaces Note: See the attached MUSP Comparison Table for specific listing of modifications from previously approved project. The project will be located at approximately 1435-1441 Brickell Avenue (see attached legal description, location maps and aerial photographs for exact property boundaries). Pursuant to Ordinance 11000, as amended, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami. Florida, the subject proposal incorporates the following new subordinate special permits: • Class II Special Permit for signage (Article 6, Section 605.3). • Class II Special Permit for reduction of size for 1 loading berth from 12 ft. X 35 ft. to 2 berths at 10 ft. by 35 ft. (Article 9). Pursuant to Article 13 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, approval of the requested Major Use Special Permit modification shall be considered sufficient for and inclusive of the subordinate permits referenced above. In determining the appropriateness of the proposed modifications to the project, the following findings have been made: • It is found that the proposed mixed use development project will benefit the Downtown District by creating a new residential, hotel and office use along Brickell Avenue to serve Downtown area businesses, travelers and visitors. The associated recreational facility will also be beneficial to downtown by providing a unique indoor recreational setting available to the public. • It is found that the project is well -designed and complements the scale and character of the Brickell Avenue area. The project will enhance the subject property and will significantly improve the appearance of the area by enhancing the Brickell Avenue corridor. • It is found that the Large Scale Development Committee (LSDC) has recommended approval of the proposed project (with conditions incorporated herein) at its meeting held on April 22, 1998. • It is found that the Urban Development Review Board (UDRB) has recommended approval of the proposed project at its public meeting held on June 10, 1998. • It is found that due to the increased development program proposed for the site, and the narrow width of SE 14" Lane, there may be a potential adverse effect associated to traffic impacts from this project on existing developments currently using SE 14`' Lane. • It is found that due to the increased number of uses being incorporated into this project and the proposed design solution which situates each of the separate lobby areas off of one central motor court area, there is a potential for confusion among patrons arriving to the site; a complete directional signage plan should be prepared to address this issue. • It is found that with respect to all additional criteria as specified in Section 1305 of Zoning Ordinance 11000, the proposal has been reviewed and found to be adequate. Based on these findings, the Department of Planning and Development is recommending approval of the requested Major Use Special Permit with the following conditions: 1. The approval of this Major Use Special Permit shall be subject to the recordation of the following documents prior to the issuance of any building permits for the proposed project: 2 98- 786 a. Unity of Title or covenant in lieu thereof providing that the ownership, operation and maintenance of all common areas and facilities will be by the property owner or a .mandatory property owner association in perpetuity. b. Development Order specifying that the Development Order runs with the land and is binding on the Applicant, it successors and assigns, jointly or severally. 2. The applicant shall be responsible for working with the Department of Planning and Development to mitigate any traffic impacts associated with this project on existing developments currently using SE 14" Lane; this may include adding a lane from the access point of the project to Brickell Avenue to increase capacity, limiting egress to right turns only, or any other solution which will mitigate the traffic impacts; a final mitigation plan shall be subject to the review and approval of the Department of Planning and Development. 3. The applicant shall submit a parking plan for construction employees while the new building is under construction; said parking plan shall be subject to review and approval by the Department of Planning and Development prior to the issuance of any building permits. 4. The applicant shall prepare a complete directional signage plan for the main motor court area which clearly depicts the lobby areas and access points for each of the proposed uses. 5. The applicant shall provide plans for proposed sidewalk and Swale area improvements prior to the issuance of a building permit; said plans shall be subject to review and approval by the Public Works Department and the Department of Planning and Development. 6. The applicant shall retain the services of an archeological consultant who will be responsible for conducting archeological monitoring of all ground disturbing activity; said consultant shall obtain a scope of work from the Miami -Dade County Archeologist and shall provide reports both to that office and the City of Miami Preservation Officer. 7. This approval shall also be subject to all additional conditions specified in the Final Development Order for the project. 3 ti� f Gases - S.E. 14 TERR. \ It x 0 � o. M, MITI I u Ll t y�on V �• A1� ,il�\ It\ <slt.;\�,` {i\ it\•' {\ i\ il�\ siteri\ {i.\ .{i\/iu,. rile\ �{It\ rii..; r{�\ .{i\,`. r,/�� �i\ ,il�\. �\ �����ii�C, �r�� ,��:.-y,•- •����I,,I p IlOo�lu� A SUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENT TO APPLICATION FOR~A Y"JOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT e Number MU- _ It is .intended that major use special permits be required where specified uses and/or occupancies involve natters deemed to be of citywide or area -wide importance. The City Commission shall be solely responsible for determinations on applica- tions for major use special permits. (See Article 17) The City Commission shall refer all applications for major use special permits to the Planning Advisory Board and to the Director of the Department of Planning, Building and Zoning for recommendations, and may make referrals to agencies, bodies, or officers, either through the Department of Planning, Building and Zoning or directly for review, analysis, and/or technical findings and determinations and reports thereon. (Section 1301.5.) I, Lucia A. Dougherty hereby apply to the Director of Planning, Building and Zoning of the City of Miami for approval of a Major Use Special Permit under the provisions of Article 17 of the City of Miami Zoning Ordinance. Address of Property: 1441 Brickell Avenue ' `Nature of Proposed Use (Be specific):,, Substantial Amendment to the Major Use Special Permit Resolution No. 98-103 for Amendment to the plans and approval of a MUSP for a Planned Unit Dev&lopment (per Article 5) and increase in floor area bonus (per Section 914). Preliminary Application I attach the following in support or explanation of the Preliminary Applica- tion. 1. Two copies of a survey of the property prepared by a State of Florida Registered Land Surveyor. 2. Affidavi-t 'disclosing owndrship of property covered by application and disclosure of interest form (attach Forms 4-83 and 4a-83 to application. 3. Certified list of owners of real estate within a 375-foot radius from the outside boundari.es of property covered by this application (attach Form 6-83 to application). 4. Maps of: (a) existing zoning and (b) adopted comprehensive plan designa- tions for areas on and around the property covered by this application. 5. General location map, showing relation to the site or activity to major streets, schools, existing utilities, shopping areas, important physical features in and adjoining the project, and the like. 6. Concept Plan (a) Site plan and relevant information. Section 1304.2--1 (d through h). (b) Relationship9► to surrounding existing and proposed future uses, and activities, systems and facilities (Section 1702.3-.2a). (c) Flow concept affects existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan principles and designations; tabulation of any required variances, special permits, change of zoning or exemptions (Section 1702.3.2b). 7. Developmental Impact Study (an application for development approval for a Development of Regional Impact may substitute). APPLICATION FOR A MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT (Continued) 8. Other (Be specific): 9. Fee of $ 31,927.95 based on Ordinance 10396. Additional .fees for any required special permits, changes of zoning, or variances shall be in accord with zoning fees as listed in Section 62-61 of the City Code and Ordinance 10396. Fee tabulation: Bui lding(s) : Other (Specify): 638,559 S.F. x .05 (difference of square feet between prior approved MUSP and substantial amendment to MUSP) Total: $ -31,927.95 Final Application _ I attach the following additional information in support or explanation of the final application: Signature Owner di Autfforized Aaent Adrienne F. Pardo Name: Adrienne F. Pardo Address: City, State, Zip: ,Miami, FL 33131 Phone: This application is [ ] approved [ ] denied in accord with City Commission Resolution Number: Other: 1221 Brickell Avenue (305) 579-0603 98- 786 AFFIDAVIT STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE } } SS } Before me, the undersigned authority, this day personally appeared Adrienne F . Pardo who being by me first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and says: 1. That he/she is the owner, or the legal representative of the owner, submitting the accompanying application for a public hearing as required by the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, affecting the real property located in the City of Miami, as described and listed on the pages attached to this affidavit and made a part'thereof. 2. That all owners which he/she represents, if any, have given their full and complete permission for him/her to act in his/her behalf for the change or modification of a classification or regulation of zoning as set out in the accompanying petition. 3. That the pages attached hereto and made a part of this affidavit contain the current names, mailing addresses, telephone numbers and legal descriptions for the real property of which he/she is the owner or legal representative. 4. The facts as represented in the application and documents submitted in conjunction with this affidavit are true and correct. a Further Affiant sayeth not. l� I Applicant's Signature STATE OF FLORIDA Adrienne F. Pardo COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this I 4_�_ day of May 199� by Adrienne F . Pardo who is pe*onaUy known to me or who has produced as identification and who did (did not) take an oath. Name: Notary Public -State of Florida Commission No.: OFFICIAL NOTARY SEAL My Commission Exp' MARISOL R GONZALEZ ,NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF FLORIDA COMMISSION NO. CC403667 MyCOMM ISSION EXP SETT 17•1998 OWNER'S LIST •r' S Na" T.=ZRE.ix LK 3RIC:CLL II, LTD. ling Address c / ° z60I S. SAYShORE DRIVE - Penthouse 3 :ephcne Nuaber (305) 836-3200 jal Oescriptign: SEE ATIAC.eD E.CHIBIT A mer' s NaxK ailing Address O ephcne NuMer .egal Oescription: ' s Ham Mailing Address Telephone Number Legal Description: My ot`:tr real w-ate property owmd indiridvally, jointly, or srrerally (irf corporation, partnerihip or privately) within 315 feat of tht suhjet: site is listed u follows - Street Address n/a Street Address Legal D"cription Legal Oescription Street Address Legal D"Cription 98- 786 DISCLOSURE OF OWNERSHIP .. Legal description and street address of subject real property: See Attached Exhibit 'tA" 1441 Brickell Avenue Owner(s) of subject real property and percentage of ownership. Note: Section 2-618 of the Code of the City of Miami requires disclosure of all parties having a financial interest, either direct or indirect, in the subject matter of a presentation, request or petition to the City Commission. Accordingly, question #2 requires disclosure of shareholders of corporations, beneficiaries of trusts, and/or any other interested parties, together with their addresses and proportionate interest. See Attached Exhibi-t "B" 3. Legal description and street address of any real property (a) owned by any party listed in answer to question #2, and (b) located within 375 feet of the subject real property. > n/a Owner or . ttorney for Owner Adrienne F. Pardo STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this �day of May 1998 by Adrienne F . Pardo' who is personally known to me or who has produced as identification and who did (did not) take an oath. Name: Notary Public -State of Florida Commission No.: M Commission Expires. :A_0 FFICIAL :VOTAR:F1 y N0ARI'OL R GONPUBLIC STATER ; ,qMMISSION NO. - NMMISSION EXP. DISCLOSURE OF OWNERSHEP 1. Legal description and street address of subject real property: See attached Exhibit "A" 1441 Brickell Avenue Owner(s) of subject real property and percentage of ownership. Note: Section 2-618 of the Code of the City of Miami requires disclosure of all parties having a financial interest, either direct or indirect, in the subject matter of a presentation, request or petition to the City Commission. Accordingly, question #2 requires disclosure of shareholders of corporations, beneficiaries of trusts, and/or any other interested parties, together with their addresses and proportionate interest. See attached Exhibit "B" 3. Legal --description and street address of any real property (a) owned by any party listed in answer to question 02, and (b) located within 375 feet of the subject real property. n/a Owner or AV" ey for Owner New York STATE OF HURaM COUNTY OF4WMFk 1 New York J— The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of May Philip 19_2�, by Plip H. Lovett, Vice resident "ftfc (or agent) on behalf of Terremark Brickell II, Inc., a general w , a partner0p. He/She is personally known to me or who has produced of Terremark Brickell II, LtAidentification *d (did not) take an oath. e: Notary Public -State of ew IWO rk Commission No.: My Commission Expires: USA ROMANO Notary Public, state of New York No. 01 R0505W08 Qualified in Nassau Mnty Commission Expires 411�2000 98- '786 EXHIBIT "A" Lots 1 through 23, inclusive, Block 1, together with those alleys located within said Block 1, AMENDED PLAT OF POINT VIEW, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 2 at Page 93 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. Said land lying and being in the City of Miami, Florida. 24912 FXHIRiT R TERREMARK BRICKELL II, LTD. c/o Millennium Partners 1995 Broadway, 3rd Floor New York, New York 10023 May 8, 1998 Ms. Teresita Fernandez Clerk Hearing Boards City of Miami 444 S.W. 2nd Avenue Miami, Florida 33130 Re: MUSP Application Ladies and Gentlemen: In connection with our filing for the MUSP Application, we have been asked to disclose to you our ownership structure. 1. Terremark Brickell II, Ltd., a Florida limited partnership, is the sole owner of the property. 2. Terremark Brickell II Ltd. is owned 99.99 % by Millennium Partners LLC and .01 % by Terremark Brickell II, Inc. 3. Millennium Partners LLC is the sole shareholder of Terremark Brickell 11, Inc. 4. Membership interests in Millennium Partners LLC are held by the following entities: Member interest (a) Millennium Entertainment Partners L.P., a New York limited partnership 49. 50 % (b) Whitehall Street Real Estate Limited Partnership VIII, a Delaware limited partnership 24.75 % (c) QRF I Ltd., a British Virgin Islands corporation 12.375% (d) Millennium Partners Management LLC, a New York limited liability company 1.000% 123W I 3 • d d7l d3-1M0d 3-1111JH Wd9b j 8a • W Member % Interest (e) Soros Family Partners,-, L.P., Delaware limited partnership 6.1875 % (t) George Soros, an individual 6.1875 % S. Millennium Partners LLC is managed by Millennium Partners Management LLC. Millennium Partners Management LLC is managed by Millennium Manager 1, Inc., a New York'corporation. The sole shareholders of Millennium Manager I, Inc. are Christopher M. Jeffries (a 7O% shareholder), Philip E. Aaron (a 20% shareholder) and Philip H. Lovett (a 10% shareholder). Very truly yours, TERREMARK BRICKELL I1, LTD. By: Terremark Brickell II, Inc. By: (21;4z�i4 — Name: TWlip H. Lovett Title: Vice President 712307.1 E ' d d7-1 d31MOd 311itg Wd9C : S© 86, _' Q .'.HW SPECI,,kL NVARR_- :NTY DEFD This Instrument Prepared by: Elaine M. Cohen, Esq. HUGHES HliBBARD & REED LLP 201 S. Biscayne Boulevard Suite 2500 Miami, Florida -33131. Property Appraisers Parcel Identification (Folio) Numbers: See Exhibit "C" attached hereto drantee S.S. 9: 65-0733631 97R297324 1997 JUL 03 16:C DOCSTPOEE 55,500.00 SURTX 41►625.0 HARVEY RUVIH, CLERK DADE COUNTY, F This Special Warranty Deed made as of the 1st day of July, 1997 by BRICKELL HOLDING CORP., a Delaware corporation, hereinafter called the grantor, to TER.REIvMA.RK BRICKELL II, LTD., a Florida limited partnership, whoge post office is 2601 South Bayshore Drive, Suite 1600, Miami, Florida 33133 hereinafter called the grantee: (Wherever used herein the terms "grantor" and "grantee" include all the parties to this instrument and the heirs, legal representatives and assigns of individuals, and the successors and assigns of corporations). WITNESSETH: That the grantor for and in consideration of the sum of $10.00 and other valuable considerations, receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, hereby grants, bargains, sells, aliens, remises, releases, conveys and confirms unto the grantee all that certain land situate in Dade County, State of Florida, as described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto (the "Property"). Subject to those matters set forth on Exhibit "B" attached hereto. Together, with all the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining. To Have and to Hold, the same in fee simple forever. M1970550.006 v 98- 786 I 7C' And the grantor hereby covenants with said grantee that the grantor is lawfully seized of said land in fee simple; that the 4rantor has good right and lawful authority to sell and convey said land, and hereby warrants the title to said land and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons claiming by, through or under the said grantor. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said corporation has caused these presents to be executed in its name by its proper officer thereunto duly authorized, the day and year first above written. Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of: Wi6iess Signature H • 67-frrxMEK Printed Name Witnes ignature zrS�,ti' 'Su&yC Printed Name M1970550.006 BRICKELL HOLDING CORP., a Delaware corporation �� 2 N�uAe: I. Arnesen Ti e: Vice President Address: 380 Madison Avenue, 9th Floor New York, New York 10017 C`- STATE OF NEW YOi, ) )Ss-. COUNTY OF NEW YORK ) Ile foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this o3Zday of 1997 by Dwight I. Arnesen, Vice President of BRICKELL HOLDING CORP., a Delaware corporation, on behalf of the corporation. He is personally known to me (Signature of per taking acknowle (Name of acknowledges typed, M �g g,stamped) "•' Notary Public. State of New No. 31 4888037 j t =, Qualified in Kin •.•. N • ''� (Title or rank) erm xpires arch 30. 19 :�•••"` - •'• ' Serial number, if any 3 MI970550.006 98- 786 i rrUi,r1837 EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lots 1 through 23, inclusive, Block 1, Amended Plat of Pointview, according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 2, at Page 93, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, also described as Lots 1 through 23, inclusive, Block 1, Pointview, according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in PIat Book 2, at Page 25, of the Publid'Records of Dade County, Florida. M1970550.006 EXHIBIT "B" ,-IST OF PEP-MITTED EXCEPTIONS (a) Zoning and building regulations, restrictions and ordinances now or hereafter adopted or imposed by any governmental body having,jurisdiction over the Property or any part thereof; (b) Property taxes, water charges and sewer rents for the year 1997 and subsequent years, and certified, confirmed or ratified assessment liens and pending assessments, if any; (c) Public utility declarations, easements and agreements or record and rights of utility companies to use and maintain pipes, drains, mains, wires, cables, terminal boxes, lines, service connections and facilities, located in, on, over and/or under the Property; (d) Easements or claims of easements not shown by the public records, boundary line disputes, overlaps, encroachments, and any state of facts an accurate current survey or physical inspection of the Property would show; way of record; (e) Covenants, restrictions, licenses, easements, rights, agreements and rights-of- (f) The rights of all tenants and other occupants of the Property; (g) All notes or notices of violations of law, regulations, or municipal ordinances, orders or requirements against or affecting the Property noted in or issued by any Federal, State, County, Municipal or other local departments or other governmental or quasi -governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the Property or any part thereof; (h) Encroachment of stoops, areas, cellar steps, trims and cornices, if any, upon any street or highway or adjoining premises, variations between record line and fences, hedges and retaining walls, and any encroachments of adjoining premises upon the Property; (i) Variations among the description of the Property herein, the description of the Property in any current survey, and the tax map description of the Property; 0) Easement granted to Florida Power and Light Company, recorded in Official Records Book 14290, at Page 1406, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. (k) Resolution No. R-987-89, dated September 12, 1989, recorded in Official Records Book 14258, at Page 2399, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. (1) Resolution No. R-697-90, dated July 10, 1990, recorded in Official Records Book 14646, at page 2513, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. 9'g- 786 I ERREMARK BRICKELL II N/K/A MILLENNIUM TOWER AMENDMENT TO MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT (RESOLUTION NO. 98-103) Prepared by: BERMELLO, AJAMIL HANDEL JOINT VENTURE BERMELLO AJAMIL & PARTNERS GARY EDWARD HANDEL & ASSOCIATES GREENBERG TRAURIG ATTORNEYS AT LAW SHARPTON, BRUNSON & COMPANY, P.A. MAY 8, 1998 A DEVELOPMENT OF TERREMARK BRICKELL II, LTD. 98- 786 IWO Forte Fortune Houser J r cla ]' Brickeh '' `•xPs FQ` T®yea° • . �. .Y , NO 1A�'- iR 1 — "4 -. C.P. SUB. 21-93j tax S.F. WN 37c `� �(,/ ,, 5. E. 1• 14M. — ^-. 23 74 S Rc /7 lu CL a s' Is • e Cii �sE. /4T u . LANE > �L,q B • o`�, - `'" , � T 1 td0 ♦S bkS 1 ! P�+ 5 r'O9e �A I i SSE i r� C4F CO Ems.' - • " i t _ i r. • ri ,�. Yet oatH a y ce L 0 C ---:� $KETCR j;... c . e. l : 98- 786 TERREMARK BRICKELL II N/K/A MILLENNIUM TOWER Amendment To MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT Table of Contents Article I. Project Information A. Application for an Amendment to a Major Use Special Permit 1. Approval of a PUD (as per Article 5) (Increase in square footage and parking spaces) 2. Approval of Increased Development Bonus (as per Section 914) 3. Class II Special Permit to allow for the reduction of 2 loading berths of loft. x 35ft. whereby 2 loading berths of 12ft x 35 ft is required. 4. Approval of the Millennium Tower as described in the plans dated May 8, 1998 hereby included. B. Disclosure of Ownership C. Ownership Affidavit D. Directory of Project Principals E. Project Data Sheet F. Zoning Atlas Page G. MUSP Resolution 1. Development of a multi -use office, retail, hotel and residential tower 2. Approval of a parking structure containing 963 spaces 3. Special Exception with City Commission approval to allow a drive - through facility for a financial institution 4. Special Exception with City Commission approval for a drive -through facility that does not meet the minimum stacking requirements 5. Special Exception Permit for bar/lounge in the SD-5 District 6. Class II Permit for reduction of size of loading berths 7. Class II Permit for new construction 8. Class II Permit for access from a public street with widths greater than 25 feet. ��M 9. Class II Permit for outdoor service of food/drink/shelter. 10. Class I Permit for Federal Aviation Administration clearance 11. Class I Permit for valet service 12. Class I Permit for pools/outdoor recreation area Article H. Project Description A. Zoning Ordinance No. 11000 1. Section 1304.2.1 2. Section 1702.2.1 3. Section 1702.2.2 4. Section 1702.2.3 Applications Forms; Supplementary Materials General Report Major Use Special Permit Concept Plan Development Impact Study Article III. Supporting Documents Tab 1 Minority Construction Employment Plan Tab 2 Traffic Impact Analysis Tab 3 Site Utility Study Tab 4 Economic Impact Study Tab 5 Survey of Property Tab 6 Project Criteria and List of Drawings i Article I. A. B. C. D. E. F. G. TERREMARK BRICKELL II N/K/A MILLENNIUM TOWER Amendment To MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT Project Information Project Information Application for an Amendment to a Major Use Special Permit 1. Approval of a PUD (as per Article 5) (Increase in square footage and parking spaces) 2. Approval of Increased Development Bonus (as per Section 914) 3. Class II Special Permit to allow for the reduction of 2 loading berths of 10ft.x 35ft. whereby 2 loading berths of 12ft. x 35ft. is required. Disclosure of Ownership Ownership Affidavit Directory of Project Principals Project Data Sheet Zoning Atlas Page MUSP Resolution 1. Development of a multi -use office, retail, hotel and residential tower 2. Approval of a parking structure containing 963 spaces 3. Special Exception with City Commission approval to allow a drive - through facility -for a financial institution 4. Special Exception with City Commission approval for a drive -through facility that does not meet the minimum stacking requirements 5. Special Exception Permit for bar/lounge in the SD-5 District 6. Class II Permit for reduction of size of loading berths 7. Class II Permit for new construction 8. Class II Permit for access from a public street with widths greater than 25 feet. 9. Class II Permit for outdoor service of food/drink/shelter. 10. Class I Permit for Federal Aviation Administration clearance 11. Class I Permit for valet service 12. Class I Permit for pools/outdoor recreation area y i i No \ T T O R N F: 1 t \ T I. 1 R Adrienne Friesner Pardo 305-579-0683 I G fl G G I G May 29, 1998 Ms. Teresita Fernandez Clerk, Hearing Boards City of Miami 444 S.W. 2nd Avenue, 7th Floor Miami, FL 33130 Re: Letter of Intent for the Millennium Tower - 1441 Brickell Avenue, Miami, Florida Dear Teresita: On behalf of Terremark Brickell II, Ltd. n/k/a Millennium Tower, we are submitting an application for an Amendment to an approved Major Use Special Permit ("MUSP") Resolution No. 98-103. The Amended application requests approval of the following Major Use Special Permits ("MUSP's"): A Planned Unit Development ("PUD") designation pursuant to Article 5. 2. Approval of Increased Development Bonuses pursuant to Article 914. 3. Class II Special Permit to allow for the reduction of two (2) loading berths of 10 feet by 35 feet whereby two (2) loading berths of 12 feet by 35 feet is required. 4. Approval of the Millennium Tower as described in the plans dated May 8, 1998 and prepared by Bermello-Ajamil & Partners, Inc. and Gary Edward Handel & Associates. With the approval of the PUD and the Increased Development Bonuses, the proposed plans for the Millennium Tower will increase the number of parking spaces, the square footage, the number of hotel units, and the residential units, and decrease the retail and office space, as well as add a recreational facility and a Phillips Club with 140 units. Attached as Exhibit "1" is a diagram which outlines the MUSP approved pursuant to Resolution No. 98-103 and the proposed additions pursuant to this Amended Application to the MUSP. Resolution No. 98-103 approved a MUSP which included the following: a multi -use office, retail, hotel and residential tower with 963 parking spaces; a Special Exception for a drive through financial institution; a Special Exception for a drive through facility that does not meet minimum, stacking requirements; a Special Exception for a bar/lounge in the SD-5 district; a Class II Permit for the reduction in size of loading docks; a Class II Permit for new construction in the SD-5 district; a Class II Permit for access from a public street with widths greater than 25 feet; a Class II Permit for outdoor service of food/drink/shelter; a Class I Permit for Federal Aviation Administration clearance; a Class I Permit for valet parking; and a Class I Permit for pools/outdoor recreation area. Should you have any questions, please call me at 579-0683. Thank you very much for your attention to this matter. Very truly yours, Adnenne Fnesner Pardo MIAMUPARD0A/9538631kg0701 I. DOC/5l29l98 GREENBERG TRAURIG HOFFMAN UPOFF ROSEN & QL'ENTEL. P.A. 1221 BRICKELL AVENUE MIAMI, FLORIDA 33131 305-579-0500 Far 305-579-0717 MIAMI NEW PORK WASHINGTON. D.C. PHILADF.LP111\ S.kO PAULG (j FORT LAUDERDALE WEST PALM BEACH OHL.\NDO TALL:\ILASSEE BocA RAT'ON V (nx� V - 786 6 Exhibit A MUSP Comparison MUSP APPROVED BY MUSP AMENDMENT MUSP AMENDMENT RESOLUTION 98-103 (additional) (total) SUBMITTED ON MAY 8,1998 Development Multi -Use office, PUD designation Resolution 98-103 plus residential, retail and hotel as per Increased Development Bonus additional requests Resolution 98-103 Class II Special Permit for reduction of size of 2 loading berths Approval of Millennium Tower plans dated May 8, 1998 Approval of 963 parking spaces Approval of additional 188 1,059 spaces parking spaces MUSP Application for approval MUSP Application for of PUD approval of PUD MUSP Application for MUSP Application for increased development bonus increased development (as per Section 914) bonus (as per Section 914) Special Exception to allow a drive- same Special Exception to thru facility for financial allow a drive-thru facility institutions for financial institutions Special Exception for drive-thru same Special Exception for facility that does not meet drive-thru facility that stacking requirements does not meet stacking requirements Special Exception for Bars/Lounge same Special Exception for Bars/Lounge Class II for reduction of loading Reduction of size of 1 loading Reduction of size of 2 berths berth from 12 ft. x 35 ft. to 2 loading berths from 12 loading berths 10 ft. x 35 ft. ft.x35ft. to 10ft.x35ft. Class II Permit for hotel, office Class II Permit for hotel, and hotel signage office and hotel signage Class II Permit for access from a same Class II Permit for access public street with widths greater from a public street with than 25 feet widths greater than 25 feet 98 786 MUSP APPROVED BY MUSP AMENDMENT MUSP AMENDMENT RESOLUTION 98-103 (additional) (total) SUBMITTED ON MAY 8,1998 Class II Special Permit for new same Class 11 Special Permit for construction in the SD-5 District new construction in the Sd-5 District Class II for outdoor service of same Class 11 for outdoor food/ drink/shelter service of food/ drink/shelter Class I Permit FAA Clearance same Class I Permit for FAA Clearance Class I Permit for Valet Service same Class I for Valet Service Class I Permit for same Class I Permit for Pools/Recreational Area Pools/Recreational Area Zoning District SD-5 SD-5 SD-5 Net Lot Area 168,989.56 sq.ft. same Net Lot Area 168,989.56 sq.ft Net Lot Dimensions 588 ft.6in. x same Net Lot Dimensions 588 290ft. ft.6in. x 290ft. Gross Lot Area 222,854.12 sq.ft. same Gross Lot Area (5.1 acres) 222,854.12 sq.ft. (5.1 acres) Open Space 33% (75,612.72 additional 15% (31,720.28 48% (107,377.00 sq. ft.) sq.ft.) sq.ft.) Building Footprint 116,396.68 additional 12,427.32 sq.ft. 128,824.00 sq.ft. sq.ft. Gross FAR 4.25 permitted FAR 3.34 provided additional FAR 2.77 FAR 6.11 provided 723,891.15 sq.ft. 638,558.58 sq.ft. 1,362,450.00 sq.ft. Project Gross Square Footage 353,766.35 sq.ft. additional 944,831.65 sq.ft. 2,444,126.00 sq.ft. Bldg. Frontage: Brickell 260ft. less 20 ft. 240 ft. 14" Terrace 543 ft. 5 in. less 85 ft. Sin. 458 ft. 14`h Lane 543 ft. 5 in. less 85 ft. 5 in. 458 ft. Building Height 577 ft.1 in. additional 322 ft.11 in. 900 ft. Parking Structure Height 73 ft. less 8 ft.5 in. 67 ft. Sin. 98- 786 MUSP APPROVED BY RESOLUTION 98-103 MUSP AMENDMENT (additional) SUBMITTED ON MAY 8,1998 MUSP AMENDMENT (total) Setbacks: Brickell 30 ft. 141' Terrace 15 ft. 14" Lane 15 ft. same Brickell 30 ft. 141h Terrace 15 ft. 14"' Lane 15 ft. Hotel: 246 rooms additional 20 rooms 286 rooms Office: 372,799.00 sq.ft. less 129,143.00 sq.ft. 243,656.00 sq.ft. Residential: 40 units additional 150 units 190 units Phillips Club: 0 new 180,510.00 sq.ft. (140 units) 180,510.00 sq. ft. (140 units) Recreational Facility: 0 (Sports & Health) new 199,265.00 ft. 199,265.00 sq.ft. Retail: 18,822.00 sq.ft. less 7,106.00 sq.ft. 11,716.00 sq.ft. Rec Deck: 63,290.00 sq.ft. additional 1,253.00 sq.ft. 64,543.00 sq.ft. Parking: 963 spaces additional 188 spaces 1059 spaces F:\LANDPLAN\Millenium\comparison2.wpd A SUP "kNTIAL A.'ENDMENT TO APPLICATION FORVA I R USE SPECIAL PERMIT File Number MU- _ It is intended that major use special permits be required where specified uses and/or occupancies involve matters deemed to be of citywide or area -wide importance. The City Commission shall be solely responsible for determinations on applica- tions for major use special permits. (See Article 17) , The City Commission shall refer all applications for major use special permits to the Planning Advisory Board and to the Director of the Department of Planning, Building and Zoning for recommendations, and may make referrals to agencies, bodies, or officers, either through the Department of Planning, Building and Zoning or directly for review, analysis, and/or technical findings and determinations and reports thereon. (Section 1301.5.) I, Lucia A. Dougherty hereby apply to the Director of Planning, Building and Zoning of the City of Miami for approval of a Major Use Special Permit under the provisions of Article 17 of the City of Miami Zoning Ordinance. Address of Property: 1441 Brickell Avenue Nature of Proposed Use (Be specific):; Substantial Amendment to the Major Use Special Permit Resolution No. 98-103 for Amendment to the plans and approval of a MUSP for a Planned Unit Development (per Article 5) and increase in floor area bonus (per Section 914). Preliminary Application I attach the following in support or explanation of the Preliminary Applica- tion: % 1. Two copies of a survey of the property prepared by a State of Florida Registered Land Surveyor. 2. Affidavi-t disclosing ownership of property covered by application and disclosure of interest form (attach Forms 4-83 and 4a-83 to application. 3. Certified list of owners of real estate within a 375-foot radius from the outside boundaries of property covered by this application (attach Form 6-83 to application). 4. Maps of: (a) existing zoning and (b) adopted comprehensive plan designa- tions na- tions for areas on and around the property covered by this application. 5. General location map, showing relation to the site or activity to major streets, schools, existing utilities, shopping areas, important physical features in and adjoining the project, and the like. 6. Concept Plan (a) Site plan and relevant information. Section 1304.2-,1 (d through h). (b) Relationships to surrounding existing and proposed future uses, and activities, systems and facilities (Section 1702.3•.2a). (c) How concept affects existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan principles and designations; tabulation of any required variances, special permits, change of zoning or exemptions (Section 1702.3.2b). 1. Developmental Impact Study (an application for development approval for a Development of Regional Impact may substitute). 9 8- 786 APPLICATION FOR A MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT (Continued) 8. Other (Be speci f i c) 9. Fee of 31,927.95 based on Ordinance 10396. Additional .fees for any required special permits; changes of zoning, or variances shall be in accord with zoning fees as listed in Section 62-61 of the City Code and Ordinance 10396. Fee tabulation: BuiIding (s): Other (Specify): 638,559 S.F. x .05 (difference of square feet between prior approved MUSP and substantial amendment to MUSP) Total: $ -31,927.95 Final Application _ I attach the following additional information in support or explanation of the final application: Signature ac-Lj�- Owner i Aut orize Agent Adrienne F. Pardo Name' Adrienne F. Pardo Address' City, State, Zip: ,Miami, FL 33131 Phone: This application is [ ] approved [ ] denied in accord with City Commission Resolution Number: Other: 1221 Brickell Avenue (305) 579-0603 �1 DISCLOSURE OF OWNERSHIP _egal description and street address of subject real property: See Attached Exhibit 'tA" 1441 Brickell Avenue 2. Owner(s) of subject real property and percentage of ownership. Note: Section 2-618 of the Code of the City of Miami requires disclosure of all parties having a financial interest, either direct or indirect, in the subject matter of a presentation, request or petition to the City Commission. Accordingly, question #2 requires disclosure of shareholders of corporations, beneficiaries of trusts, and/or any other interested parties, together with their addresses and proportionate interest. See Attached Exhibit "B" 3. Legal description and street address of any real property (a) owned by any party listed in answer to question #2, and (b) located within 375 feet of the subject real property. n/a Owner or . ,ttorney for Owner Adrienne F. Pardo STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI-DARE The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of May 1998 by Adrienne F . Pardo' who is personally known to me or who has produced as identification and who did (did not) take an oath. Name: Notary Public -State of Florida Commission No.: My Commission Expires: 0M��L NOT L R coNZq NOTARY PUBLIC STAtF OF FLORIDA COMMISSION NO. CC40366i MY COMMISSION EXP. SEPT 1 AFFIDAVIT TE OF FLORIDA } } SS COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE } Before me, the undersigned authority, this day personally appeared Adrienne F . Pardo who being by me first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and says: 1. That he/she is the owner, or the legal representative of the owner, submitting the accompanying application for a public hearing as required by the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, affecting the real property located in the City of Miami, as described and listed on the pages attached to this affidavit and made a part*thereof. 2. That all owners which he/she represents, if any, have given their full and complete permission for him/her to act . in his/her behalf for the change or modification of a classification or regulation of zoning as set out in the accompanying petition. 3. That the pages attached hereto and made a part of this affidavit contain the current names, mailing addresses, hone numbers and legal descriptions for the real property of which he/she is the owner or legal representative. 4. The facts as represented in the application and documents submitted in conjunction with this affidavit are true and correct. Further Affiant sayeth not. 1L Applicant's Signature STATE OF FLORIDA Adrienne F. Pardo COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of May 19�9 by Adrienne F . Pardo who is pers i1Qn Uy known to me or who has produced as identification and who did (did not) take an oath. Name: Notary Public -State of Florida Commission No.: OFFICIAL NOTARY SEAL My Commission Exp. s: MARISOL R GONZAL� NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF FLORIDA ION NO. CC403667 COMM1SS 17.1998 MY COMMISSIONlir EXP. SEPT ry 98- 786 OW EA'S LIST S H aa►e TERREMARK BRICKELL II , LTD . -ig Address c / O 2601 S. BAYSHORE DRIVE - Penthouse B hont Member (305) 856-3200 1 Dtscriptign: SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT A t r' s H aae ling Address ephone Humber gal Description: da+at Ailing Address "elephone Hcmahtr Legal 4e3cription: My othtr real estate property ow-r d indirid:uily, jointly, or seltrally (by corporation, partnership or priYately) within 373 felt of the subject site is listed u follo%n: Strtet Address n/a Street Addrtss Legal Otscription Legal Qeseription Stint Address Legal Description 8- 786 EXHIBIT "A" Lots 1 through 23, inclusive, Block 1, together with those alleys located within said Block 1, AMENDED PLAT OF POINT VIEW, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 2 at Page 93 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. Said land lying and being in the City of Miami, Florida. 24812 58 786 Sent by: GREENBERG TRAURiG 305 579 0717; 05/07/98 17:35; .Jet1fiX #456;Page 2,2 •.- -/ r DISCLOSURE OF OWNERSHIP 1. Legal description and street address of subject real property: See attached Exhibit "A" 1441 Brickell Avenue 2. Owner(s) of subject real property and percentage of ownership. Note: Section 2-61 B of the Code of the City of Miami requires disclosure of all parties having a financial interest, either direct or indirect, in the subject matter of a presentation, request or petition to the City Commission. Accordingly, question #2 requires disclosure of shareholders of corporations, beneficiaries of trusts, and/or any other interested parties, together with their addresses and proportionate interest. See attached Exhibit "B" 3. Legal description and street address of any real property (a) owned by any party listed in answer to question 42, and (b) located within 375 feet of the subject real property. n/a 6=0"VP'40'W= New York STATE OF BUMM COUNTY OFM New York � The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of May 19 U by Phil ip H. Lovett, Vice President t iirr (or agent) on behalf of Terremark Brickell II, Inc., a general ^ , a partnersh' p. He/She is personally known to me or who has produced of Terremark Brickell II, Ltididentification 'd (did not) take an oath. e: Notary Public -State of ew o rk Commission No.: My Commission Expires: USA ROMANO Notary Pudic, State ot.New fork No. 01 ROS058M Qualified in Nassau Cotnty Commission Expires 4J1i2000 EXWRiT R TERREMARK BRICKELL II, LTD. c/o Millennium Partners 1995 Broadway, 3rd Floor New York, New York 10023 May 8, 1998 Ms. Teresita Fernandez Clerk Hearing Boards City of Miami 444 S.W. 2nd Avenue Miami, Florida 33130 Re: MUSP AMlication Ladies and Gentlemen: In connection with our filing for the MUSP Application, we have been asked to disclose to you our ownership structure. 1. Terremark Brickell II, Ltd., a Florida limited partnership, is the sole owner of the property. 2. Terremark Brickell II Ltd. is owned 99.99.% by Millennium Partners LLC and .01 % by Terremark Brickell II, Inc. 3. Millennium Partners LLC is the sole shareholder of Terremark Brickell II, Inc. 4. Membership interests in Millennium Partners LLC are held by the following entities: 712307.1 Member Interest (a) Millennium Entertainment Partners L.P., a New York limited partnership 49.50 % (b) Whitehall Street Real Estate Limited Partnership VIII, a Delaware limited partnership 24.75 % (c) QRF I Ltd., a British Virgin Islands corporation 12.375 % A Millennium Partners Management LLC, a New York limited liability company * 1.000 % 98 - '786 a77 >4-Z7Mn 4 71 1 i Hq WAC4o : Cn R;' Le Add MemberInterest (e) Soros Family Partners, L.P., Delaware limited partnership 6.1875 % (f) George Soros, an individual 6.1875 % 5. Millennium Partners LLC is managed by Millennium Partners Management LLC. Millennium Partners Management LLC is managed by Millennium Manager 1, Inc., a New York corporation. The sole shareholders of Millennium Manager I, Inc. are Christopher M. Jeffries (a 70% shareholder), Philip E. Aaron (a 20% shareholder) and Philip H. Lovett (a 1O% shareholder). Very truly yours, TERREMARK BRICKELL II, LTD. By: Terremark Brickell II, Inc. By: Name: Wlip H. Lovett s Title: Vice President 712307.1 9V 786 C�.177011 i 834 SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED This Instrument Prepared by: Elaine M. Cohen, Esq. HUGHES HUBBARD & REED LLP 201 S. Biscayne Boulevard Suite 2500 Miami, Florida 33131, Property Appraisers Parcel Identification (Folio) Numbers: See Exhibit "C" attached hereto Grantee S.S. n: 65-0733631 9 7 R 2 9 7 8 2 4 1997 JUL 03 16:06 DOCSTPOEE 551500.00 SURTX 41r625.00 HARVEY RUVIN, CLERK DADE COUNTY, FL This Special Warranty Deed made as of the Ist day of July, 1997 by BRICKELL HOLDING CORP., a Delaware corporation, hereinafter called the grantor, to TERREMARK BRICKELL II, LTD., a Florida Iimited partnership, who$e post office is 2601 South Bayshore Drive, Suite 1600, Miami, Florida 33133 hereinafter called the grantee: (Wherever used herein the terms "grantor" and "grantee" include all the parties to this instrument and the heirs, legal representatives and assigns of individuals, and the successors and assigns of corporations). WITNESSETH: That the grantor for and in consideration of the sum of $10.00 and other valuable considerations, receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, hereby grants, bargains, sells, aliens, remises, releases, conveys and confirms unto the grantee all that certain land situate in Dade County, State of Florida, as described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto (the "Property") Subject to those matters set forth on Exhibit "B" attached hereto. Together, with all the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining. To Have and to Hold, the same in fee simple forever. MI970550.006 90 -. 786 qA / 1770 183 And the grantor hereby covenants with said grantee that the grantor is lawfully seized of said land in fee simple; that the grantor has good right and lawful authority to sell and convey said land, and hereby warrants the title to said land and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons claiming by, through or under the said grantor. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said corporation has caused these presents to be executed in its name by its proper officer thereunto duly authorized, the day and year first above written. Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of- 4 V—Z - C 4 - Wi ess Signature i-L3P-11-L H - Ui2 mmE'K Printed Name Witnes ignature kz1S r.: <;4j�SUvc Printed Name BRICKELL HOLDING CORP., a Delaware corporation IN N e: (Dwight I. Arnesen Tie: Vice President Address: 380 Madison Avenue, 9th Floor New York, New York 10017 2 MI970550.006- 9 8_ 786 F I T 7 0 1 1838 STATE OF NEW YORK ) ) SS: COUNTY OF NEW YORK ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 22�-day of ZS—tA _h �, , 1997 by Dwight I. Arnesen, Vice President of BRICKELL HOLDING CORP., a Delaware corporation, on behalf of the corporation. He is personally known to me (Signature of per taking acknowlez,.,-4) (Name of acknowledger typed, VRj&;AA 24Istamped) = j��:s'4'•: �� • Notary Public State of New York* 4 Na. 31 888037 - �,':},( 0 N ' Qualified in Kin u _ (Title or rank) erm hxpires March 30. 19 7''. _��, ,,:.:.:•••:�• Serial number, if any ' 3 MI970550.006- ^ � ' .17701 1837 F� EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lots 1 through 23, inclusive, Block 1, Amended Plat of Pointview, according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 2, at Page 93, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, also described as Lots 1 through 23, inclusive, Block 1, Pointview, according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 2, at Page 25, of the Public*Records of Dade County, Florida. MI970550.006 98 ;- 786 EXHIBIT "B" LIST OF PERMITTED EXCEPTIONS (a) Zoning and building regulations, restrictions and ordinances now or hereafter adopted or imposed by any governmental body having jurisdiction over the Property or any part thereof; (b) Property taxes, water charges and sewer rents for the year 1997 and subsequent years, and certified, confirmed or ratified assessment liens and pending assessments, if any; (c) Public utility declarations, easements and agreements or record and rights of utility companies to use and maintain pipes, drains, mains, wires, cables, terminal boxes, lines, service connections and facilities, located in, on, over and/or under the Property; (d) -Easements or claims of easements not shown by the public records, boundary line disputes, overlaps, encroachments, and any state of facts an accurate current survey or physical inspection of the Property would show; way of record; (e) Covenants, restrictions, licenses, easements, rights, agreements and rights -of - (f) The rights of all tenants and other occupants of the Property; (g) All notes or notices of violations of law, regulations, or municipal ordinances, orders or requirements against or affecting the Property noted in or issued by any Federal, State, County, Municipal or other local departments or other governmental or quasi -governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the Property or any part thereof, (h) Encroachment of stoops, areas, cellar steps, trims and cornices, if any, upon any street or highway or adjoining premises, variations between record line and fences, hedges and retaining walls, and any encroachments of adjoining premises upon the Property; (i) Variations among the description of the Property herein, the description of the Property in any current survey, and the tax map description of the Property; 0) Easement granted to Florida Power and Light Company, recorded in Official Records Book 14290, at Page 1406, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. (k) Resolution No. R-987-89, dated September 12, 1989, recorded in Official Records Book 14258, at Page 2399, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. (1) Resolution No. R-697-90, dated July 10, 1990, recorded in Official Records Book 14646, at page 2513, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. 98-- 786 ri 17701'1^ 18?g r EXHIBIT "C" LIST OF FOLIO NUMBERS Folio Nos. Lot. No. 01-0210-050-2010 01-0210-050-2020 2 01-0210-050-2030 3 01-0210-050-2040 4,5 & 6 01-0210-050-2070 7 01-0210-050-2080 8 01-0210-050-2090 9 01-0210-050-2100 10 01-0210-050-2110 11 & 12 01-0210-050-2120 13 01-0210-050-2130 14 01-0210-050-2140 15 01-0210-050-2150 16 01-0210-050-2160 17 01-0210-050-2170 18 01-0210-050-2180 19 01-0210-050-2190 20 & 21 01-0210-050-2191 22 & 23 D M pFFiC FtECL't.� . }VO^ RF C :CCA-- AECC VERlFrEC HP,AVEY FUVIN^�c_ MI970550.006 - 9 786 CONSUELO M. QUINTANA REAL ESTATE DATA RESEARCHER Jill SW llth Avenue, Miami, FL 33129-1820 OFC # 305-858-2287 FAX # 305-859-2439 JULY 30, 1997 CITY OF MIAMI PLANNING & ZONING BOARD ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT P.O. BOX 330708 MIAMI, FL 33133 RE: PROPERTY OWNERSHIP LIST WITHIN 3775' FT FROM: 125-26, 139, 144, 148-49, 158-59, 169, 180, 187, 190 SE 14TH TERR & 1433-35-39-41 BRICKELL AVENUE MIAMI, FL 33129 (STREET ADDRESS) LOTS 1 THRU 23, TOGETHER WITH THOSE CERTAIN PUBLIC ALLEYS (TO BE ABANDONED) BLOCK 1, AMENDED PLAT OF POINT VIEW PLAT BOOK 2-93 (LEGAL DESCRIPTION) DADE COUNTY FLORIDA. THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE ATTACHED OWNERSHIP LIST, MAP AND MAILING MATRIX IS A COMPLETE AND ACCURATE REPRESENTATION OF THE REAL ESTATE PROPERTY AND PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 375' FEET OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY LISTED ABOVE. THIS REFLECTS THE MOST CURRENT RECORDS ON FILE IN THE DADE COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S OFFICE. (23 LABELS) (MIA-2012)(INV-1818) 08- 1sc (L-290L) (23 LABELS) (ORIC ALLY 61 NAMES) 37 ERG BRICKELL LTD 2_ JjHAMBRA CIR #1100 GABLES FL 33134 BRICKELL HOLDING CORP % CHEMICAL REALTY GROUP 227 PARK AVE NEW YORK NY 10172 COMMODORE BAY CONDO CONDO ASSOC 1402 S BAYSHORE DR MIA FL 33131 BABYLON INT'L INC 180 ISLAND DR KEY BISC FL 33149 KINGSTAR INTL INC & 3EL HECTOR & DAVIS 2 3 BISC BLVD 41ST FL MIAMI FL 33131 BLACKWELL HOLDING INC % STEEL HECTOR & DAVIS 200 S BISC BLVD #41FL MIAMI FL 33131 TERREMARK BRICKELL LTD 2601 S BAYSHORE DR #PHI MIAMI FL 33133 REPUBLIC INTL BK OF NY 1451 BRICKELL AVE MIAMI FL 33131 HAMPTON PK DEV INC P 0 BOX 6055 SURFSIDE FL 33154 CITY OF MIAMI 3500 PAN AMERICAN DR MIAMI FL 33135 BRICKELL EAST CONDO ASSC 151 SE 15TH RD MIAMI FL 33129 COSTA BELLA CONDO ASSC 1450 S BAYSHORE DR MIAMI FL 33131 BRICKELL SHORES CONDO CONDO ASSOC 1440 S BAYSHORE DR MIAMI FL 33131 DIOCESE OF NEWTON FOR THE MELKITES IN THE USA INC 1501 BRICKELL AVE MIAMI FL 33129 BAYSHORE CO-OP INC THE PALACE CONDO POINT VIEW APTS CONDO ASC CONDO ASSOC 1430 S BAYSHORE DR 1541 BRICKELL AVE MIA FL 33131 MIAMI FL 33129 BAYSHORE PLACE CONDO ASSC RICHARD OCCONNELL TR 1420 S BAYSHORE DR % TRANSAL CORP FL 33131 2121 SW 3 AVE 8TH FL MIAMI FL 33129 1 BRICKELL INV RLTY CORP % ELENA MOLA 1850 K ST NW WASHINGTON DC 20006 EVERETT V SUGARBAKER 1500 BRICKELL AVE MIAMI FL 33129 PHOENIX INV CO LE REM RICHARD O'CONNELL TR 2121 SW 3 AVE 8FL MIAMI FL 33129 BRICKELL BAY TOWER CONDO THE TAPLIN CO LTD CONDO ASSOC 1177 KANE CONCOURSE 1408 SE BAYSHORE DR BAL HARBOUR FL 33154 MIA FL 33131 98- 786 EI FORTE PLAZA PB 96-21 TRACT A (L-290) (61 LABELS) TR A BLUMBERG BRICKELL LTD 1401 BRICKELL AVE 255 ALHAMBRA CIR #1100 #01-02105-007-010 C GABLES FL 33134 POINT VIEW SUB, PB 2-93 BLOCK 1 LOT 1 BRICKELL HOLDING CORP 126 SE 14TH TERR % CHEMICAL REALTY GROUP 227 PARK AVE NEW YORK NY 10172 .LOT 2 BRICKELL HOLDING CORP 158 SE 14TH TERR % CHEMICAL REALTY GROUP 227 PARK AVE NEW YORK NY 10172 LOT 3 BRICKELL HOLDING CORP ? SE 14TH TERR % CHEMICAL REALTY GROUP 227 PARK AVE NEW YORK NY 10172 LOTS 4-5-6 BRICKELL HOLDING CORP 144 SE 14TH TERR % CHEMICAL REALTY GROUP 227 PARK AVE NEW YORK NY 10172 LOT 7 BRICKELL HOLDING CORP 1425 BRICKELL AVE % CHEMICAL REALTY GROUP 277 PARK AVE NEW YORK NY 10172 LOT 8 BRICKELL HOLDING CORP 1433 BRICKELL AVE % CHEMICAL REALTY GROUP 277 PARK AVE NEW YORK NY 10172 LOT 9 BRICKELL HOLDING CORP 1435 BRICKELL AVE % CHEMICAL REALTY GROUP 277 PARK AVE NEW YORK NY 10172 LOT 10 BRICKELL HOLDING CORP 1439 BRICKELL AVE % CHEMICAL REALTY GROUP 277 PARK AVE NEW YORK NY 10172 :S 11-12 BRICKELL HOLDING CORP 441 BRICKELL AVE % CHEMICAL REALTY GROUP 277 PARK AVE NEN YORK NY 10172 LOT 13 & 14 BRICKELL HOLDING CORP 125 SH 14TH TR % CHEMICAL REALTY GROUP 277 PARK AVE NEW YORK NY 10172 LOT 15 BRICKHLL HOLDING CORP 139 SE 14TH TR % CHEMICAL REALTY GROUP 277 PARK AVE NEW YORK NY 10172 LOT 16 BRICKELL HOLDING CORP 149 SE 14TH TR % CHEMICAL REALTY GROUP 277 PARK AVE NEAT YORK NY 10172 LOT 17 BRICKELL HOLDING CORP 159 SE 14TH TR % CHEMICAL REALTY GROUP 277 PARK AVE NEW YORK NY 10172 LOT 18 BRICKELL HOLDING CORP 169 SE 14TH TR % CHEMICAL REALTY GROUP 277 PARR AVE NEW YORK NY 10172 LOT 19 BRICKELL HOLDING CORP 187 SE 14TH TR % CHEMICAL REALTY GROUP 277 PARR AVE NEW YORK NY 10172 LOTS 20-21 BRICKSLL HOLDING CORP 190 SE 14TH TERR % CHEMICAL REALTY GROUP 227 PARK AVE NEW YORK NY 10172 LOTS 22-23 BRICKHLL HOLDING CORP 180 SE 14TH TERR % CHEMICAL REALTY GROUP 227 PARK AVE NEW YORK NY 10172 BLOCK 2 LOT 4 1402 S BAYSHORH DR 5 LESS "LY IOFT FOR R/W & S1/2 OUT LOT 5 L-..S NLY 2t-'T FOR R/W BK 2 240 SE 14TE ST COMMODORE BAY CONDO CONDO ASSOC 1402 S BAYSHORB DR MIA FL 33131 BABYLON INT'L INC 180 ISLAND DR KEY BISC FL 33149 ALL LOT 6 & 7 LESS BEG NW COR ESOFT SWLY TO ALLY RINGSTAR INTL INC WLY24.5FTNLY TO POB & N25FT OUT LT 5 & STEEL HECTOR & DAVIS 218 SE 14TH ST 200 S BISC BLVD 41ST FL MIAMI FL 33131 BEGIN AT NW COR LT 7 B50FT S TO ALLEY W24.5FT N KINGSTAR INTL INC TO BEG & LT 8 & STEEL HECTOR & DAVIS 194 SE 14TH ST 200 S BISC BLVD #41FL MIAMI FL 33131 LT 9 & B15FT OF LT 10 LESS NLY10FT THEREOF BLACKWELL HOLDING INC FOR R/W % STEEL HECTOR & DAVIS 180 SE 14TH ST 200 S BISC BLVD #41FL MIAMI FL 33131 B40FT LOT 11 & W35FT LT 10 LESS NLY THEREOF BLACKWELL HOLDING INC Fn" R/W % STEEL HECTOR & DAVIS 3E 14TH ST 200 S BISC BLVD #41FL MIAMI FL 33131 W10FT LT 11 & LT 12 TERREMARR BRICKELL LTD 160 SE 14TH ST 2601 S BAYSHORE DR #PHI MIAMI FL 33133 LOT 13 TERREMARK BRICRELL LTD 152 SE 14TH ST 2601 S BAYSHORE DR #PHI MIAMI FL 33133 LOT 26 TERREMARR BRICKELL LTD 151 SE 14TH TERR 2601 S BAYSHORE DR #PHI MIAMI FL 33133 LOT 27 TERREMARR BRICKELL LTD 157 SE 14TH TERR 2601 S BAYSHORE DR #PHI MIAMI FL 33133 LOT 28 TERREMARR BRICKELL LTD 165 SE 14TH TERR 2601 S BAYSHORE DR #PHI MIAMI FL 33133 . 29 & LOT 30 LESS ESFT TERRZ3UUtK BRICKELL LTD _.S SE 14TE TERR 2601 S BAYSHORE DR #PHI MIAMI FL 33133 9 V 786 • ,M �j tlflolmtlw� F#01-02105-002-430 F#01-02105-006 S175FT LOT 34 LESS S12FT N OF LOT 35 1430 S BAYSHORE DR S300FT OF N325FT OF LOT 34 LESS SWLY 5FT 1420 S BAYSHORE DR F#01-02105-008 BAYSHORE CO-OP INC POINT VIEW APTS CONDO ASSC 1430 S BAYSHORE DR MIA FL 33131 BAYSHORE PLACE CONDO ASSC 1420 S BAYSHORE DR MIA FL 33131 LOTS 1-2-3-31-32-33 & ELY 5FT OF LOT 30 & PORT OF LOT 34 BEG AT NE COR S25FT SWLY TO W/L N8FT TO NW COR RELY TO POE OF LOFT ALLEY LYG S OF BRICKELL BAY TOWER CONDO SLY/L OF LOT 4 EXT W & NLY OF LOT 34W LESS CONDO ASSOC 1408 S BAYSHORE DR 1408 SE BAYSHORE DR F#01-4140-026 MIA FL 33131 LT 45 LESS NELY 5FT FOR R/W & N1/2 OF IT 46 BK 2 REPUBLIC INTL SK OF NY 14e^ BRICKELL AVE 1451 BRICKELL AVE Ft )2105-002-530 MIAMI FL 33131 OUT OF LOTS 58-59 HAMPTON PK DEV INC VACANT F#01-02105-002-640 P O BOX 6055 SURFSIDE FL 33154 OUT LOT FOOT OF BROADWAY CITY OF MIAMI VACANT GOVT 3500 PAN AMERICAN DR F#01-02105-002-660 MIAMI FL 33135 7#01-4139-044-0001 EAST BRICKELL TOWER SUB PA 117-86 BRICKELL EAST CONDO ASSC TRACT A 151 SE 15TH RD 151 SE 15TH RD MIAMI FL 33129 TRACT B TR B REPUBLIC INTL BK OF NY 1451 BRICKELL AVE 1451 BRICKELL AVE F#01-4139-036-0020 MIAMI FL 33131 F#01-4139-026-0010 COSTA BELLA SUB, TRACT A PB 107-14 TRACT A COSTA BELLA CONDO ASSC 1450 S BAYSHORE DR 1450 S BAYSHORE DR MIAMI FL 33131 F A_BAHIA SUB, PB 109-13 1 ? BRICKELL SHORES CONDO i S BAYSHORE DR CONDO ASSOC F#01-4139-028 1440 S BAYSHORE DR MIAMI FL 33131 PORT OF LTS 1 THRU 5 & PORT OF LT 39 OF PS 5-44 DESC BEG MOST WLY COR OF IT 39 TH N 52 DEG E 169. 40FT S 57 DEG E 249.92FT S 32 DEG W 83.45FT N 57 DIOCESE OF NEWTON FOR THE DEG W 22 724FT S 52 DEG W 121.773FT N 37 DEG W KELKITES IN THE USA INC 129.038FT S 52 DEG W 52.31FT N 37 DEG W 112.99FT 1501 BRICKELL AVE TO POE - MIAMI FL 33129 1501 BRICKELL AVE PORT OF LTS 5 THRU 11 & SN75FT OF LT13 & PORT OF THE PALACE CONDO LT 39 (F#01-4139-038-0001) CONDO ASSOC 1541 BRICKELL AVE 1541 BRICKELL AVE MIAMI FL 33129 MARY BRICKELL ADDN, PB B-113 BLOCK 99 "LOTS 1-2 RICHARD OCCONNELL TR 1414 BRICKELL AVE % TRANSAL CORP 2121 SW 3 AVE STH FL MIAMI FL 33129 LOTS 3 THRU 7 & N1/2 OF LT 8 THE TAPLIN CO LTD J' 1 BRICKELL AVE 1177 KANE CONCOURSE BAL HARBOUR FL 33154 LOT 9 & S1/2 OF LOT 8 BRICKELL INV RLTY CORP 1432 BRICKELL AVE % ELENA KOLA 1850 K ST NW WASHINGTON DC 20006 LOT 10 & N1/2 LOT 11 BRICKELL INV RLTY CORP 1438 BRICKELL AVE % ELENA KOLA 1850 K ST NW WASHINGTON DC 20006 S1/2 LOT 11 & LOT 12 BRICKELL INV'RLTY CORP 1440 BRICKELL AVE % ELENA KOLA 1850 K ST NN WASHINGTON DC 20006 LOT 13 & N1/2 LOT 14 BRICKELL INV RLTY CORP 1485 S MIAMI AVE % ELENA MOLA 1850 K ST NW WASHINGTON DC 20006 LOT 15 & PORT OF LOT 14 BRICKELL INV RLTY CORP 1460 BRICKELL AVE % ELENA KOLA 1850 K ST NN WASHINGTON DC 20006 17-18 BRICKELL INV REALTY CORP _.d5 S MIA AVE is ELENA KOLA 1850 K ST NW WASHINGTON DC 20006 0S SOT 19 BRICKELL INV REALTY CORP 1475-1477 S MIAMI AVE % ELENA NOLA 1850 K ST NN WASHINGTON DC 20006 LOTS 20 & S1/2 LOT 21 BRICKELL INV REALTY CORP 1465 S MIAMI AVE % ELENA NOLA 1850 K ST NW WASHINGTON DC 20006 LOT 22 & N1/2 LOT 21 BRICKELL INV REALTY CORP 1451-1453 S MIAMI AVE % ELENA NOLA 1850 K ST NW WASHINGTON DC 20006 LOT 23 BRICKELL INV REALTY CORP 1443 S MIAMI AVE % ELENA NOLA 1850 K ST NW WASHINGTON DC 20006 LOTS 24-25 BRICKELL INV REALTY CORP 1435 S MIAMI AVE % ELENA NOLA 1850 K ST NW WASHINGTON DC 20006 LOT 26 PHOENIX INV CO LE 1421 S MIAMI AVE REM RICHARD O'CONNELL TR 2121 SW 3 AVE 8FL MIAMI FL 33129 NWLY75FT OF LTS 27-28 PHOENIX INV CO LE 1411 S MIAMI AVE REM RICHARD O'CONNELL TR 2121 SW 3 AVE 8FL MIAMI FL 33129 SWLY75FT OF LTS 27-28 PHOENIX INV CO LE 20 SE 14TH ST REM RICHARD O'CONNELL TR 2121 SW 3 AVE 8FL MIAMI FL 33129 BRICKEL•L• FLAGLER PB 5-44 BLOCX 55 LOTS 41 & 42 EVERETT V SUGARBAKER 1500 BRICKELL AVE 1500 BRICKELL AVE MIAMI FL 33129 ST ''ASS AT BRICKELL PA 146-99 T � - A TERREMARK BRICKELL LTD HT 2601 S BAYSHORE DR PHI F#01-4139-057-0010 MIA PL 33133 98- 786 16-A & 16-B 1 SE 15TH RD BRICKELL INV REALTY CORP as ELE'NTA MOLA 1850 R ST NW WASHINGTON DC 20006 98- 786 'ERREMARK BRICKELL II iK/A MILLENNIUM TOWER 1441 Brickell Avenue Amendment to MUSP irectory of Project Principals Owner/Developer: Terremark Brickell II, Ltd. 2601 South Bayshore Drive Penthouse B Miami, FL 33133 Telephone: 856-3200 Fax: 856-8190 Jonathan Breene Architect: Bermello, Ajamil Handel Joint Venture Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. 2601 South Bayshore Drive I Yh Floor Miami, FL 33133 Telephone: 859-2050 Fax: 860-3700 Willy Bermello Telephone 860-3735 Tere C. Garcia Telephone 860-3758 Vivian Bonet Telephone: 860-3762 Gary Edward Handel & Associates 1995 Broadway New York, NY 10023 Telephone: (212) 595-4112 Fax: (212) 595-9032 Gary E. Handel Carey Chu Landscape Architect: The Office of Dan Kiley East Farm Charlotte, Vermont 05445 (8021425-2141 (802) 425-3288 Bermello Ajamil & Partners 2601 South Bayshore Drive Miami, Florida 33133 Perla Aguayo Telephone: 859-2050 98- 786 Traffic: Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. 2601 South Bayshore Drive 10`' Floor Miami, FL 33133 Telephone: 859-2050 Fax: 859-7666 Fernando Alonso Telephone: 860-3705 Civil: Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. 2601 South Bayshore Drive 10`h Floor Miami, FL 33133 Telephone: 859-2050 Fax: 859-7666 Fernando Alonso Telephone: 860-3705 Economist: Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. 1 S.E. Third Avenue, Suite 2100 Miami, FL 33131 Telephone: 374-1574 Fax:372-8161 Darryl Sharpton Thomas Schlosser Attorneys: Greenberg, Traurig, Hoffman Lipoff, Rosen & Quental, P.A. 1221 Brickell Avenue Miami, FL 33131 Fax: 579-0717 Lucia Dougherty, Esq. Telephone: 579-0603 Adrienne Friesner Pardo, Esq. Telephone: 579-0683 98- 786 TERREMARK BRICKELL II N/K/A MILLENNIUM TOWER Amendment To MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT Project Data Sheet 1. Legal Description: 2. Address: 3. Zoning Classification: 4. Lot Area: Gross Area Net Area 5. Density: Units/Acre Allowed Units/Acre Provided 6. Allowable Area: Floor Area Ratio (FAR) Lots 1 through 23, inclusive, block 1, together with those alleys located within said Block 1, AMENDED PLAT OF POINT VIEW, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat book 2 at page 93 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. Said land lying and being in the City of Miami, Florida. 1441 Brickell Miami, Florida City of Miami SD-5 5.11 acres or 222,854 sq. ft. 3.74 acres or 162,989 sq. ft. 500 units/acre 37 units/acre 4.25 allowed 6.11 provided with request of PUD and bonuses 7. Loading Berths: Required: 6 loading berths: 2 loading berths 12 ft. x 55 ft. x 15 ft. 4 loading berths 12 ft. x 35 ft. x 15 ft. Provided: 2 loading berths 12 ft. x 55 ft. x 15 ft. 2 loading berths 12 ft. x 35 ft. x 15 ft. 2 loading berths 10 ft. x 35 ft. x 15 ft. 98-- 786 Project Data Sheet (Cont.) 8. Height: No height limitation Tower 900 ft. Provided Parking Structure 67 ft. Provided 9. Building Footprint: 128,824 SF 10. No. Of Parking Spaces: 658 minimum/ 1403 maximum required 1059 provided Handicapped spaces 13 minimum/28 maximum required 24 provided 11. Open Space: 33,428 sq.ft. required (15%) 107,377 sq.ft. provided (48%) 12. Setbacks: Brickell 30 ft. required 30 ft. provided 14`h Terrace and 15 ft. required 14`h Lane 15 ft. provided 98- 786 i 7 to /04 ST. a SE. ' r rlf so fa 17t + s sry J � \ d ; rES v i J 144 ^ B-T 44rfyo1 I Ai y a^ 'I7 r�- 4 ! All ZI 14 rq via /2 rN �° Otis o° o rq♦ �� i to �O Sic �r FORTE 14 I ," I 1J ogR�E��. rU4 /l ��/ PROPERTIE •� (8q.s� F SUB. (113.2 /3Ty 5T. .3 SE via sr. r 1. N4 S7 B xs a i rf 1 / 4O S s.~ �i a '� • CPS,w /4tN v + `^^II 9 Rea M f/ Is jr f Fi 4` SW!' Af,7A T"w NitTAhLT h •• '' ,`S r V �4• aJ y a u I v 7RAtr �. E#.df _ • \ r � sf •Pe �. � VItCAYA 1\ L a Noitym _ / ZONING KEY t'tA`t - 6-98 WED 8: 2 1 P. 02 i J- 8-77 1/ 5/98 RESOLUTION NO. � 3 A RESOLUTION, WITH ATTACHMENTS, APPROVING WITH CONDITIONS, A MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT PURSUANT TO ARTICLES 13 AND 17 OF ZONING ORDINANCE N0. 11000, FOR THETERREMARK BRICKELL II PROJECT, TO BE; LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY 1435 BRICKELL AVENUE, MIAMI, FLOP-IDA; TO BE COMPRISED OF A MIXED USE ` BUILDING WITH NOT MORE TRAN 372,799 SQUARE FRET OF OFFICE SPACE, 246 HOT�I, ROOMS, 40 RESIDENTIAL UNITS, 28,824 SQUARE FEET OF ACCESSORY COMM9BRCIAL/RETAIL SPACE AND 963 PARKING SPACES; DIRECTING TRANSMITTAL OF THE ! HEREIN RESOLUTION; MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATING CONCLUSIONS OF LAW; PROVIDING FOR BINDING EFFECT; CONTAINING A* SEVBRABILITY CLAUSE AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECtIVE DATE. WHEREAS, on October 31, 1997, Terremark Brickell II, Ltd., a Florida Limited Partnership ("APPLICANT"), submitted a complete i Application for Special Exception and Major Use Special Permit i fof the Terremark Brickell II Project ("PROJECT") pursuant to zo�ing Ordinance No. 11000, Articles 13 and 17, for the property lo�ated at approximately 1435 Brickell Avenue, Miami, Florida, as .le�ally described in "Exhibit All; and WHEREAS, development of the PROJECT requires the issuance of a Major Use Special Permit pursuant to Article 17 of Zoning Ordnance No. 11000, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of =Miami, F1�rida, as amended; and ATTACHMENT 1AN 2 7 W8 O K T A t N E Q is�, 03 • ti MPt1r 8. WED 8 2? 1 j i { WHEREAS, the Large Scale Development Committee met on a _ • i tctIober 6, 1997 to offer its input pertaining to technical issues tefated to the PROJECT; and 1 WHEREAS, the Urban Development Review Board met on NoJember 13, 1997 and recommended approval of the proposed prJject; and WASRF.AS, the Miami Planning Advisory hoard, at its meeting bf'December 17, 1997, Item No. 3, following an advertised public hedring, adopted Resolution No. PA,g 76-97 by a vote of five to ze�o (5-0), RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of the Major Use Special Permit o Development Order as attached hereto, subject to APPLICANT 60 1plying with all conditions of the Development order for the �P, CT, and WHEREAS, the City Commission deems it advisable and in the befit interest of the general welfare of the City of Miami to ..s ue a Major Use Special Permit Development Order for the 4ECT as hereinafter set forth; NOW, THSRSFOR$, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY _OPMIAMI, FLORIDA: i Section 1. The recitals and findings contained in the PrLamble to this Resolution are .thLreto and incorporated herein as Section. . s . i i r ' -2- hereby adopted by reference if fully set forth in this 8-6 mrZI.y— 6-9a WED P . 0 Section 2. A Major Use Special Permit Development Order, attached hereto as Exhibit "B" and made a part her*e6i, is hereby apJroved subject to the conditions specified in sa'id'Development brier, per Article 17 of Zoning Ordinance 11000, as amended, io- the Terremark Brickell. II Project (hereinafter referred to as th HPIkOJEC`rII) to be developed by Terremark: Brickell II, Ltd., a t1drida Limited Partnership, (hereinafter referred to as the PAILICANT11), at approximately 1435 Brickell Avenue, Miami, t1i,rida, more particula-rly described in "Exhibit All, attached he eto and made a part hereof. JSection st3. The PROJECT is hereby approved for the ruction of up to 372,799 square feet of office space, 246 �o el rooms and 40 residential units with 28,824 square feet of Oc ess6ry commercial space and 963 parking spaces, Scction 4. The findings of fact 'set forth below are be eby made with respect to the subject PROJECT: a., The PR6JECT is in conformity with the adopted Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1P89-2000, as amended. b.* The PROJECT is in accord with the SD-5 Zoning classifications of Zoning Ordihance No. 11000, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended. c. Pursuant to Section 1305 of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, the specific• site plan aspects -3- -: 98 786. MAY- 6- 9 8 W E D 8: 5 P.® Z5 of the PRQJ$CT, i.e., ingress and egress, parking, signs and Lighting, utilities, Orainage;:preservation. of natural features and control of potentially adverse effects generally, have been Cohsidered=and will be farther considered administratively during the process of issuing a building permit and a Certificate of occupancy.' d. The PROJECT. is. expected to cost approximately $186 million, and to employ approximately 174 workers during congtruction (FTE); and 480 ' employees annually (recurring). The PROJECT will generate approximately $3.8 trillion annually in ad valorem tax revenues to local units of government (1997 dollars). e: The City Cornnission further finds.that: (1) the PROJECT will have a favorable impact on the economy of the City; (2) the PROJECT will efficiently use public transportation facilities; (3) any potentially adverse effects of the PROJECT will be mitigated through compliance with the conditions of this Major Use Special Permit; (4) the PROJECT will favorably affect the need for people to find adequate "housing reasonably accessible to their places of employment; -4- .98 786 r1i F4 Y 6-19e WEID 0 : 2 -S (5) the PROJECr will efficiently use necessary public facilities; (6) the PROJECT will not negatively impact the environment and natural resources of the City; (7) the PROJECT will not adversely affect living conditions in the neighborhood; (8) the PROJECT will not adversely affect public safety; .(9) based on the record presented and evidence presented, the public welfaie will be served by the PROJECT; and (10) any potentially adverse effects of the PROJECT arising from safety and security, fire protection and life safety, solid waste, heritage conservation, trees, shoreline development, minority participation and employment, and minority contractor /sOcontraidtor participation will be mitigated through -compliance with the conditions of this Major Use Special Permit. Section 5. The Major Use Special Permit, as approved and aMqnded,.9b,a1l be binding upon the applic' ants and any successors in -interest, P1PiY.- 8. ..W_E:D 8 ?4 P. 0.7. i 4 J Section 6. The. application for Major Use Special Permit, which was -submitted .on October 31, 1997,':and on file with the b4artment of Planning and Development of *the City, of Miami,' ril lrida, shall .'be:.. relied upon generally for . administrative ' i.nerpretations and is made a part hereof by reference. Section 7. This Major Use Special Permit will expire two (2F years from its effective date which is thirty (30) days after th4 adoption of the herein Resolution. + Section S. The City 'Manager is hereby directed to in tract* the pirector of the Department of Planning and, pelelopment.to transmit a.copy of this Resolution and attachment to?the:developers: Terremark Brickell II, Ltd., a Florida Limited Pattnerrhip, 2601 South Sayshore Drive, Penthouse B, Miami, F1. 33133. s Section 9. The Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law ark made with respect to the Project as described in the Development Order for the Terremark Brickell II Project, which is 'attached hereto. as Exhibit "B" and made a part hereof by reference.- Section 10. The Major Use Special: Permit Development Or er for the Terremark .Brickell II Project (Exhibit "B") is hereby granted and issued. Section 11. In the event that any portion or section of - Resolution or the Development Order (Exhibit "B") it i MAY - 6-9!0, _WED 8 , P.- .08 determined to be invalid, illegal, or unconstitutional by a court : „ : or, agency of competent" jurisdiction, such ,decision."ShiIi in no tear ner of f ect the remaining portions *of 'this Res:olut�on or PpJelopmen*'Order (Exhjbit "B°) which shall:'remain in full force Inc Effect Ili Section 12..This'Resolution shall become effective thirty {3} days after its adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 27th day of J'anuar 1998.: ; XAVIER L. SUAREZ,'.MAYOR In accordance with Miami Code Sec. 2-38; stnt a the Mayor did not indicate appr6M 11 this iegisfation by signing it in the designatgd place .provided, said legislation now becomes effective wRh the Elapse of ten (10) days from the date of Commission action regardN saute, Wok ut the Mayor exercising ` at AT' rsST s Waiter 1 City Cierk WA•LTRR 'J : PQEMAN, CITY CLERK PR PARED AND APPROVED W: ,. I I � S ISTAW CITY A 0 X+0V8D•AS.TO FORM AND CORRECTNHSS: ' L EDWARD, WBLL EAIM CITY TTURNEY W2 7t:GKW:B$S 98':- 786 -7- MAY6-98 WED 8 .- i. Block 1, together With those Lots 1 through 23, inclusive, pLAT OF • . alleys located ��' ?aid Stock 1, AMN. of D tht lat thereflf as rccordcd in. POINT ViEVJ, �c�ording to p Plat Book 2 at•Pigc 93 bf the Public R the Gityo f M Florida. Said land lying and being t Florida. M,C�Y- 6-9.8• WED a = —05 P 10 EXHIBIT "B" S DEVELOPMENT ORDER N 1 ATTACHMENT TO ' RESOLUTION NO f9'. '• i DA: i TSRRfiMARK BRICKBLL' II PRO►7SCT MAJOR .USE 'SPECIAL PERMIT DEVELOPMENT..ORDER e'•it be known that pursuant to Articles 13.and 17 of Ordinance 1 0 he Zohing Ordinance of the City:of.Miami, Plorida, as ' m�nded, the Commission of the city of Miami, Florida, .has,. �o sidi red' in a, public hearing, the issuance of a. Major* Use Sp vial Permit fo.r the Terremark Brickell I2 .Project (hereinafter :. re erred to as the "PROJECT") to' be located' at approximately 1435 ' Br ckell' Avenue,: Miami, Florida; see legal descriptionon hE hlbit- All, attachedheretoand made a 'past , hereof; said legs}.. ' decription• is subject to. any ' dedicat•i.one; limitation9, • ' k2•tiidtions, reservations or easements of .record, cif etdue. considerati•on. • pf the recommendtiona of the ` Zoning ho rd Snd Plannin • Advises • Board and after 'due. consideration of h consistency of :this proposed development with the:. Miami.. Co pr2bensive Neighborhood Plan, the City co mtissioii has' approved the PROJECT, and subject to the following conditions approves the hies or. Us,e special Permit and hereby issues this Permit*: AA 2 a M.A`(•— 6-98. W ED • :*. ..� •. •• . ;• . ' is .. ... RUMMMg ny F ('T pRC6 CT DESCRIPTION: _ The proposed Terremark Brickell II Project . -is : -a mixed tis,e de elopment'located at••approximately`1435 Brickell Avenue, Miami, Florida;' ("PROJECT") ; .The PROJECT is ' lodated.. on: approximately, ,1 'gross: acres '. and 3 .14 netacres of land (more spe'cif ical,ly', i• described on "Exhibit A")' incorporated herein by reference). The. -ve ainder of the PROJBCT's VITAL DATA is attached 'hereto* as �Eb4iBti' C" , and incorpbrated herein by reference . The `proposed PROJECT will consist of 372,799 square feet of gffice-.space, 246 hotel rooms, and 40 residential units with 28,824'square feet of,.accessory commercial ;space and 963 parking SpaIce6.:. The btii;lding will consist of ' a single 38 story tower;. it ; ., will also contain a:recreation deck of ;approximately 63,290 $q.!ft. of. outdoor space • which includes racquetball, 'tennis,.* baSetball; running track, lap `pool, jacu2z `arid an outdoor'. cafe. The ownership, operation and maintenange of common areas and facilities Will be by the property owner . or 'a mandatory property b er. association in perpetuity'' pursuant to a recorded Declarat.ioft of Covenants n and Re§tiictios. _ _ MAY- 6.-9 e. ,t4ED 12 The Major Use' Special Permit Application for* the.Terremark $ri�ckell II Project has a companion' application for .Special ; Hxceptions as follows,. Special Exception. with City. Commissionapproval, per- Article 6, Section 605•.4.3 (1) to allow a. • drive-thru :facility for a financial institution; Special Exception with City Commission approval, per Article 9 for a drive-thru facility that does not meet 't'he- minimum stacking requirements: R �i gd* Prnvi rjaA* • Lane 1 10 4 Lane 2 8 5 *: Stacking spaces before the Service Vindow. Special Exception per Article 6, Section 605.4.3 (2) to Allow a Bar/Lounge within the SD-5 district; The: Major Use Special Permit Application for the Terremark Brickell II Project also encompasses the following lower ranking Sp�cial•Permits: CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT per Article 9f Section 915.2'for. a Federal Aviation Authority clearance litter; CLASS Z SPBCTnr, PERM .T per Article 9, Section 917.1.2 for valet Service; CLASS I SPECIAL 'PERMIT per Article;.9, Section 906.9 for. Pool/Outdoor Recreational Area;. CLASS I SPECIAL- PERMIT per Article 9, Section 923.4 for replacement: of. one (1) 12x35 loading • bertit with • two (2) 1Ox35.loading berths; -3- 98 - 78.E . t'trilr 6-98. .W.ED 8_ 2 P 1 3 -CLASS.. II SPECIAL', PERMIT 'as per • Article 6;. Section `605.3 . for new constfuction in, the SD-5. Zoning District;'. CLASS ;I1 SPECIAL;' pERMIt as 'per Article 9, • Section. 908.2. for access from; a:.•public• street with widths'greater than 2. feet; ' CLASS II SPECIAL PS1tMI'T. as per Article 16, Sect.i' on 605.5 (2y for:'outdoor' service; of food/drink/shelter; '. ` Pursuant to' Articles: r3 and 17.. of Zoning Ordinance No:.. 110,00, ., approval . of tbe. requested, Major Use Special: Permit•.• shall be considered, sufficient for the 6u)6rdinate permits and : efler;erSced above. .... . th � Pro ect shall be constructed • _• � j , . co . d SubsLantiaYly in accordance with � • ]Pl�n5 and design. schematics, including the; landscape plan, .on fie t p rep�`ared 'by Berinello A3amil & Pa rtners1997, ga '3d :design and landscape plans. may be •permitted to be niodif iea only "to :the.• extent necessary to comply ,with the conditions .:fbr ; �p roval' imposed . herein; all modificati6ii shall be subject`: to th review 'and • approval of the Director'. of the Department - of Pl nnin ''aind Development 'prior to tree issuance of any building The.- PROJECT conforms -to the reQuirements'of the SD-5 Zoning Di sitrict', as contained ip• an No. 11000, the zoning' Ordnance• of the :City cjf Miami, Florida, has wended. ; The existing comprehensive ••,plan future •'laftc3 use designation mows' the .proposed - amix and intensity of commerci .1 and 're idenEial, uses.. -4- M A Y— a6 — 9 a. W.E D_ $_�e_ P 1 4 PRIOR• TO THE, ISSUANCE 0F• A' BUILDING PERMIT tHt 'APPLICANT,• �T$ SUCCESSORS,•AND/OR•ASSIGNS, JOINTLY, OR SEVERALLY, SHALL DO. IrAl POLLOWING X. Met all a licable building codes, land development • : ..� a PP .• .. . ice gul,ations,'ordinances and other laws. 2.'Provide a list of agencies from which. approvals :and/or pefti-ts must 'be obtained prior •to • .initiation of development .:'and the permit or approval required 'of . each.. 3.. A110'w the Miami 'Police Department to conduct a security , survey; at. the option of the .Department, and to fnake ' recommendations concerning security, measures and systems; further submit a report to the Planning Department, prior to ; commencement of construction, demonstrating how the Police Department recommendations, if any,, have been incorporated` into the PROJECT security and construction plans, or demonstrate to the Planning Director why such 3 • recondations are impractical. 4.. j . • Pravicle a letter from the Department of Fire -Rescue . indicating APPLICANT'S: coordination with members of the Fire ,Plan .Review Section at the Department: of Fire -Rescue for -the .i •review of t.be scope ' .of the : PROJECT,. owner responsibility building •deve•lopment. process and review procedures', as well as :specific: requirements for fire protection and life safety systems, egrese,.•vehicular access and water supply: Provide a letter of . 'assurance front the Solid. Waste {. Department' that the PROJECT -has addressed all concerns ot: : :• i the said Department. .6,1 Prepare a Minority Participation and'EmpXoyment Plan to be submitted to . the CityI s Director of. Minority' and • Women • Business Affairs for review : and ` co'M' Ments, . -with • the understanding that the City 's Minority/Women Business A Y 7 3. 14 8_.. W.E: D. ;.B Affairs. and Pro c*u­r'6meht* Ordinance i9o. 10538 is'. -A guide that he: APPLICANT. M`Us't: use its best efforts to f 0 low. Pregarea. kinioii ty Contractor/Subcontractor: Piiitic1pation' Plan to the City's Director of 'Minority and Women Eudiness Affairs' for review and comment,:' wit the 'undjr*­ s a t'ing-md that..* the City's Minority/Wiomein BusJhess Affairs". -and Pr*q,curement Ordiriagce No...-IOSIS is'a guide 'that the APPL.- -"Mlist use'. .,its best e.fforts,tq follow. :Record in .the Public: Records of Dade '."Coianty, Florida, Decliirition. b:E. 'Covenant's and Ize's-tricti6n's'' p'roVidihg that the -ownership, b operd.ti , on and. maintenance ot'all: -cbmw'n' 'areas and J fact!" t;1es. w. A 1.": by' the property owner or.. a'- waxidatory. pr9pe'rty owner association in perpetuity,. Rd.cord a• 6eritified,Qopy of -the development 'order with Cl ieik` of.th6 Dade Cou'nty Circuit Cou t r specifying that the. .D6,Velppment 'Or'dei: runs with the land and is binding on 'the Ap"pli"bant­ its 'successors,' and signs, jointly or severally. Prov''ide the City with an executed,'recordable unity*Qt title or in -lieu -of unity. Of t At -le agreement f6r the. ..aiibject property; said agreement shall' 'to :the review and approval o f 'the' City 's Law Department. .Provide the' Public' Works .'Department :of the City, of Miami with plans for proposed sidewalk and.stvale-area improvementg fpr their.-revie�r and approval "prior to the''- issuance of '.a' bvilditig Permit. ..Pr&vide the.* Department'. of Planning and - Development with 'a ..tempdrary Parking pl' ah which addrdsses d6notruction.employee .:parking and temporary parking arrangements for tbe­eXi6ti no Wil ling during6t16 a: the construction per d;. said plan shall be' subject to the review and approval by th6. Department p;:ic)r `to*tbe­.iss;uance of any building permits: The: applicant shall work'with staff to* address the" proppse'd building, a * dapping ele. tnt .in an effo�rt- to ensure that "the P 9 'final 'result is the TrfoEit complementary to the. proposed buildii�g. I 1A 11F?�'_-•...6.,-48 _ WED 1B THR CITY SHALL':'- 1 $ub j ect to payment of all ' applicable fees ; due; ' establish the effective date of this. Permit .ag being thirty •(30) days from. •thd: date. of its issuahte 'with:. the is`suax'ce ;date- constituting the -commencement :of' • tfie' thirty (30) :day period to appeal from 'the provisions of the .Permit:. ' ' COHMMTAM The. Terremark Brickell II Project., proposed '. by the ' ,applicant, Terxemark Brickell II, Ltd. a Florida timited•. s .. Ra't-dership, ("Applicant"),'complies•with the Miami Compzehens•ive J 'Neighborhood Plan 1989'2000, is consistent with the .orderly, development and ;goals of: the City, of Miami, and complies with LO` al. land development regulations and further, pursuant to .t6#ion 1.7.03 of Zoning Ordinance No, : 11400 , .(1) the PROJECT • will have a favorable impact on . the' economy of the City; and • (2) the PROJECT will efficiently use .'public transpgrtation facilities; and ` (3) the P120JECT : will favorably'. affect the, need for people to find adequate housing reasonably accessible . to their places of employment;' and ' (4) the PROJECT will •efficiently use neeessar]f public facilities; and. -7- - 8 �l 6.-_98, WED (5} the PROJECT will not negatively :impact the environment.. grid :natuzal resources ' of the. City; and {6) the PROJECT: will not adversely • 'affect' :'public safety (7) . the public -welfare will be sowed by ahe PROJECT; ; l and (8).any potentially adverse effect6 of the PROJECT will• be mitigated through conditions 'of this Major Use Special Permit. The proposed development does not unreasonably ( interfere with the -achievement of the objectives of the adopted State Land Development Plan •appIicab.le to the City of Miami. Pursuant to Section 1305•of Zoning Ordinance No., 11000.- the' specific site plan aspects the. CrPROJBi.e., ingress ''and egress, offstreet •. g parking and.. loading, refuse •and • } service 'areas, sig ns and lighting, utilities, •drainage" and • •' . control of potentially adverse effects generally have" been considered and will be further considered administratively during the : process of issuing- individual building* 'permi•ts and certificates of occupancy. Article II. A. TERREMARK BRICKELL II 1v/K/A MILLENNIUM TOWER Amendment To MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT Project Description Project Description Zoning Ordinance No. 11000 1. Section 1304.2.1 Applications Forms; Supplementary Materials 2. Section 1702.2.1 General Report 3. Section 1702.2.2 Major Use Special Permit Concept Plan 4. Section 1702.2.3 Development Impact Study 98-- 786 TERREMARK BRICKELL II N/K/A MILLENNIUM TOWER AMENDMENT TO MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT Zoning Ordinance No. 11000 1. Section 1304.1.1 Application forms; supplementary materials (a) Statements of ownership and control of the proposed development of activity. The Disclosure of Ownership and Ownership Affidavit are provided in Article I. (b) Statement describing in detail the character and intended use of the development or activity. Millennium Tower represents a new model for urban living Combining retail, sports club, hotel, Class A office space and luxury apartments, it will be a place where people from Miami and around the world can shop, recreate, visit, work and live. The development will become a signature building for Miami, a modern building for a modern city on the cusp of the 21' Century. The project, because of its diversity of uses and appropriate massing, will fulfill the urban design goals for this site. The building engages Brickell Avenue with retail and lobbies, encouraging a dynamic 24 hour a day life of the city. The project is located on Brickell Avenue between SE 10 Terrace and SE le Lane in the City of Miami, Florida. The development parcel has a net lot area of 162,989.56 square feet or 3.74 acres, and a gross lot area of 222,854.12 square feet or 5.11 acres. The property fronts on Brickell Avenue and is located on the circle between SE 141h Terrace and SE 141h Lane. The property is located within the SD-5 overlay zoning district. The first 7 levels of the proposed tower contain hotel functions, lobbies and the sports club. A water feature cascades from the recreation deck level through these 7 levels and creates an exciting arrival sequence. L--vels 10 thru 17 contain 243,656 square feet of office development and levels 20 thru 31 house the hotel of 234,858 square feet and 286 rooms. The hotel contains a ballroom, smaller meeting and board rooms, hotel restaurant and bar and other like amenities. -1- 98 - 786 The Phillips Club, an extended stay apartment/hotel facility, houses contemporary accommodations which are complemented by a full range of services and amenities that will please even the most seasoned traveler. Generous living areas and full kitchens provide all the conveniences of home. The Phillips Club spans from the 32 level to the 41st level of the tower with 140 units. Finally, levels 42 to 78 house the 190 luxury residential units which will include the most spectacular views in the City of Miami. In addition there is retail located along Brickell Avenue, 14" Terrace and 14`h Lane creating an urban plaza like atmosphere all around the site. The tower is situated on the northwestern portion of the site. The hotel and residential element of the tower fronts Brickell Avenue with an east/west orientation. The office element of the tower is parallel to Brickell with a north/south orientation. The height and form of the office element is compatible to other developments on Brickell. The tower has been designed to be sensitive to the neighbors with its slender, elegant profile facing the residential community. The project includes a 6 level parking structure with 1,059 parking spaces which supports the entire development. The seventh floor of the parking structure serves the spacious, dramatic, beautifully landscaped recreation deck which houses both indoor and outdoor amenities to serve the project. The project is designed in such as way that there is no exposure of the parking garage from Brickell or the surrounding streets. The main entrance to the project is through a landscaped three lane motor court, off SE 14' Terrace, which enters into a porte cochere with access to both the hotel, sports club lobby and the office lobby. A secondary access takes the public to the hotel main lobby and ballroom amenities, by a specially designated elevator. Entrance to the parking garage is through SE 14" Terrace and SE 14t' Lane. The 14`h Terrace entrance is opposite the hotel lobby for direct access to the parking structure for valet parking. An additional entrance to the parking structure, to be used mostly by office employees and visitors, is located on SE 14`h Lane. There is an additional entrance off SE 14`' Terrace for the residential owners to self or valet park. Both entrances can also be used by hotel patrons when major events are booked and multiple points of access and egress are desirable. The service area for the tower is along SE 14`h Lane. A smaller service to be used by the retail is located at the northeast end of the site, along SE 14`h Terrace. -2- 98- 786 The hotel component will include the following uses: Hotel ComgQnent 286 Guest rooms Public areas (Vestibules/lobbies) Hotel retail (Gift shop/sundries/specialty shops) Front desk/Public areas (Registration & other hotels support services) Guest amenities (Business center/spa/fitness center) Restaurant/Lounge/Bar Function areas (Ballroom/meeting rooms & function support areas) Food service areas Maintenance (Housekeeping/employee facilities/mechanical/electrical) Offices (Executive/accounting/general) Circulation (Stairs/elevators/general circulation for public & staff) Receiving/Purchasing (Service area & loading docks) The Phillips Club 140 units Stwrts Club 199,265 Square Feet Residential Compgnent 190 Apartment units Office Component 243,656 Square Feet Retail Space 11,716 Square Feet The ground floor houses utility facilities such as a FPL transformer vault, and an emergency generator. The main electrical, telephone rooms, domestic pumps and main mechanical rooms are located on the second floor. The hotel and office service area is accessed from 14`h Lane. The retail service area is accessed from 14`h Terrace. Drawings showing the architectural character and location of the intended uses are included under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. -3- 9S- 786 (c) General location map, showing relation of the site or activity for which special permit is sought to major streets, schools, existing utilities, shopping areas, important physical features in and adjoining the project or activity and the like. The following exhibits are included with the Major Use Special Permit Application: (1) Aerial: Aerial photograph of the surrounding area indicating the project site. (2) Area Context Map/Site Aerial: Map of the project area indicating buildings and their functions that surround the site. (3) Location Map: Map of the surrounding street system indicating the project location. (d) A site plan containing the title of the project and the names of the project planner and developer, date, and north arrow and, based on an exact survey of the property drawn to a scale of sufficient size to show. The project's developer is Terremark Brickell II, Ltd., an entity controlled by Millennium Partners. The architects, planners and engineers are Bermello, Ajamil Handel Joint Venture which includes Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. and Gary Edward Handel and Associates. The general information requested is shown on the Ground/Site Plan, provided under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. The site plan includes the following: (1) Boundaries of the project, any existing streets, buildings, watercourses, easements and section lines. The boundaries and the location of existing streets and easements are shown on the Boundary Survey located under Tab 5 of the Supporting Documents. (2) Exact location of all buildings and structures. The exact locations of all existing buildings located on the property are shown on the Boundary Survey under Tab 5. The location of the buildings to be constructed are shown on the Context Site Plan, on the Ground/Site Plan and on Ground Floor Landscape Plan, located under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. -4- i (3) Access and traffic flow and how vehicular traffic will be separated from pedestrian and other types of traffic. Vehicular access for the tower is from 14`h Terrace through a landscaped, three lane motor court. Access to the parking garage for valet parking is located opposite the office and hotel lobbies. There are additional entrances located on 141h Terrace and another entrance is located on 14`h Lane. These are to be used mostly by office patrons and visitors and for special hotel events. The service drives for the tower, as well as the loading areas are located on 14`h Lane. There is a smaller service drive with loading bays located at the Northeast corner of 14`h Terrace to be used by the retail shops. The project can be accessed by pedestrians from Brickell and 14`h Terrace and the retail area can be accessed by Brickell, 14`h Lane and 14`h Terrace. The plazas surrounding the entire building and garage create a pedestrian friendly urban environment which is activated by the retail shops at street level frontage. A detailed analysis of the site access and traffic flow is provided in the Traffic Impact Analysis located under Tab 2 of the Supporting Documents. (4) Off street parking and off street loading areas. The off street parking facility is located adjacent to the tower toward the eastern portion of the property. The parking structure contains 6 levels of parking with 1,059 parking spaces which support the entire development. The seventh floor of the structure serves as the recreation deck. The off street parking facility is provided under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. A Class II Special Permit is being requested to allow for the reduction of 2 loading berths to loft. x 35ft. The Zoning Ordinance requires 6 loading bays, 2 at 12ft. x 55ft. and 4 at 12ft. x 35ft. These loading berths will service the hotel, the office, the residences and the retail areas. The 4 loading bays 12 ft. x 55 ft. and 12ft. x 35ft. are located on 14`h Lane and the 2 smaller loading bays are loft. x 35ft., located at the northeast comer of 14`h Terrace. The clearance for all hotel loading bays is 15 feet. Service areas are shown on the Ground Floor Site Plan, under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. IMIE M� (5) Recreational facilities locations. This project provides for extensive recreational opportunities. Located principally within the sports club will be Miami's premier health club facility. Located on the 4`h thru 6`' floors of the project, the club will contain approximately 90,000 square feet of recreational space as well as restaurants, pro shop, day care, salon and spa uses. The club will feature hot and cold pool, basketball and squash courts, exercise and weight rooms, spinning, aerobics and multi -purpose rooms and a wide variety of individually structured fitness activities. These facilities are shown on the 4th Level Plan - Lower Sports Club and the 6th Level Plan - Upper Sports Club, located under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. A seventh floor roof top terrace is the centerpiece of the complex, with over an acre of open air cafe, cool green groves, pools, walkways, tennis courts, colorful flowering trees and vines. The rooftop deck offers recreation and elegance, artfully entwined into a spatial structure of trees, paving and water. Perhaps the most important element is a light steel pergola which encircles the entire roof deck. It is a grand promenade which unites the area, and also serves as a shaded/ walking path for exercise. Flowering vines will cover the pergola, such that the structure almost disappears beneath a verdant filigree. The promenade begins just off the hotel's banquet room, and parallels the periphery wall until it ends at the paved terrace directly in front of the restaurant an bar. The periphery wall itself is proposed to be white concrete block, solid up to 42", then punctured at strategic locations that frame positive views out while safely holding the observer in. Lush vines will be planted along the base of the wall. These facilities are shown on the Hotel Function - Landscape Plan - 7th Level located under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (6) Screens and buffers. The entrance into the rooftop gardens is defined by a grove of tall shade trees. Set a fair distance apart and limbed up quite high to create an open effect, the grove is in essence an outdoor room, a vestibule which welcomes visitors and provides an intermediate pause and viewing spot between interior and exterior space. Open terraces flank both sides of the entry grove, one providing a seating area for the restaurant and the other for the banquet facility. At the restaurant, cafe tables and chairs will be interspersed with several flowering trees to create a pleasant eating atmosphere. At the banquet terrace, a bright splashing waterfall pours down from the floor above into a channel which connects to the swimming pool. A trellis along the north side of the terrace offers shaded seating and an armature for plants. 98- '786 The entrance area of the roof deck is taken up with two tennis courts and a 40' x 120' (approximate) swimming pool. Cabanas line the north and south sides of the pool, with one flowering tree offset from each cabana wall (these small trees provide dimension and color and spatial flow between the cabanas, yet are set far enough back from the pool that shade and debris should not be a problem). On the west end of the pool, a broad paved terrace offers plentiful room for chaise lounges and other forms of sun worship. A jacuzzi rests at the south side of the sun terrace, its outer half protruding into a vast, shallow lily pool. Thus while soothed by the bubbling jacuzzi, visitors will be surrounded by colorful, fragrant lilies of many varieties. The lily pool stretches beneath a grove of royal palm trees. The trees are set on a fifteen foot quincunx grid, in eight foot diameter planting drums with ground cover surface. An intimate stepping stone path winds around the soaring palm trunks, offering visitors a playful exploration route off the primary promenade. On one side of the path, an array of lilies carpet the glittering water; on the other side, a series of tiny, low fountains piece the water's surface with delicate, dancing fingers of water. At the street level, we propose a double row of flowering trees, set twelve feet on center, to parallel the parking structure in a corona formation. At the base of the tower the flowering trees change to blocks of live oak, set fifteen feet on center which create a spatial rhythm to help balance the striking verticality of the building. On either side of the main entrance, a griddled grove of live oak bring strong definition to the entry sequence. An island of flower trees set behind the live oaks provide a common ground for meeting and resting as people come and go. Ground cover and annuals may blanket some areas beneath the trees together with benches and street furniture. At the south entrance to the apartment complex, a row of palms rise off the steps and integrate green architecture with built form. These facilities are shown on the Ground Floor Landscape Plan and the Hotel Function - Landscape Plan - 7th Level under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (7) Refuse collections areas. Waste collection will be provided by a containerized compactor system located within the service area in the residential tower. In addition the project will have a high rise recycling system. The hotel includes a dry wash, refrigerated garbage rooms and can wash. These facilities are shown on the Ground Floor Site Plan, located under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (8) Access to utilities and points of utilities hookups. -7- 98- 786 Access and connections to site utilities are discussed in the Site Utility Study located under Tab 3 of the Supporting Documents. (e) Tabulations of total gross acreage in the project and the percentages thereof proposed to be devoted to: (1) The various permitted uses. Tower and Garage 57.8 % of gross lot area. (footprint - 128,824 sq. ft.) The development and uses included within the Tower and Garage are divided into the following percentages of the buildings Tower and Garage not of the site: Hotel 10.2% Residential 28.9 % Office 10.6 % Rec. Deck 2.6 % Parking 22.5 % Other uses 7.8 % Phillips Club 7.8 % Retail 1.0 % Sports Club 8.6 % Open areas (include plazas, 48.3 % of gross lot area. exterior courts, outdoor recreational areas and street level pathways and walkways) (2) Ground coverage by structures. Ground coverage by the structures is 57.8 % of the total gross lot area. (f) Tabulation showing the following: IM 98 -- 78b (1) The derivation of numbers of off street parking and off street loading spaces shown in (d) above. The total number of off street parking spaces provided is 1,059 spaces. Derivation of the numbers of off street parking is shown under Project Criteria - Parking/Loading, located under Tab 6. (2) Total project density in dwelling units per acre. Total project density is 37 units per acre. (g) If common facilities (such as recreation areas of structures, private streets, common open space, etc.) are to be provided for the development, statements as to how such common facilities are to be provided and permanently maintained. All common facilities provided will be maintained by the Owner(s). (h) Storm drainage and sanitary sewerage plans. Storm drainage, water distribution, waste water and solid waste generation provisions are discussed in the Site Utility Study located under Tab 3 of the Supporting Documents. (i) Architectural definitions for buildings in the development; exact number of dwelling units, sizes and types, together with typical floor plans of each type. Detailed information and breakdown of square footage of all uses are found under Project Criteria , included under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. Typical floor plans for the hotel units are shown on the Typical Hotel Floor Plans. Typical floor plans for residential units are shown on the Residential Floor Plans. Typical office floor plans are shown on the Office Floor Plans. Floor Plans for the Sports Club and the Phillips Club are shown on 4th Level Plan - Lower Sports Club, 6th Level Plan - Upper Sports Club and Typical Phillips Club Floor Plans. All drawings, including elevations and sections, are located under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. 0) Plans for signs, if any. The project includes "signature" signs. The hotel and office includes signs at Brickell and at the motor lobby. The retail includes signs as part of the storefront facades. (k) Landscaping plan, including types, sizes and locations of vegetation and decorative shrubbery, and showing provisions for irrigation and future maintenance. 98 - 786 The landscape plans showing vegetation are found on the Ground Floor Landscape Plan and the Hotel Function Landscape Plan - 7th Level located under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (1) Plans for recreation facilities, if any, including location and general description of building for such use. The Th floor of the parking garage serves as a recreation deck for the development and includes indoor and outdoor amenities. The indoor recreational facilities include: two squash courts, a hot and cold pool, jacuzzi, lockers, bathrooms and showers. Exterior facilities include a tennis courts, a jogging and walking trail, a garden and sun deck. There is also a cafe and bar, as well as a garden with a reflecting pool and trellis covered pergolas. This creates the atmosphere of a urban park for the use of the residents, the hotel and office patrons. Located within the hotel, there is a restaurant, lounge and bar with access from Brickell Avenue to serve both the hotel guests and the public. The retail component covers the street level shops, as well as those around the garage and within the hotel. These facilities are shown on the Ground Floor Site Plan and the Hotel Function - Landscape Plan - 7th Level, located under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (m) Such additional data, maps, plans, or statements as may be required for the particular use or activity involved. The details of the spaces and calculations used to compute the Floor Area Ratio (FAR) are shown on the FAR Plans, Sheets FAR- 1.0 thru FAR- 1.14 provided under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. The drawings covering the roof and mechanical, electrical and plumbing rooms are included also under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (n) Such additional data as the Applicant may believe is pertinent to the proper consideration of the site and development plan. Sections and elevations depicting the architectural character of the building are shown on the Buildings Elevations. All elevations and sections are located under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. 2. Section 1702.2.1 General Report (1) Property ownership or ownership and beneficial interest within the boundaries of the area proposed for Major Use Special Permit. -10- 98- 786 Statement of Ownership and beneficial interest within the boundaries of the area proposed for Major Use Special Permit are provided in Article I, Project Information. (2) The nature of the unified interest or control. The nature of unified interest or control is indicated in Article I, Project Information. (3) Survey of the proposed area showing property lines and ownership. A copy of the Boundary Survey is included under Tab 5 of the Supporting Documents. (4) Map of existing features, including streets, alleys, easements, utilities' lines, existing land use , general topography and physical features. The existing site features and utility lines are shown on the Boundary Survey of the property located under Tab 5. The site features and the utilities are also described in the Site Utility Study, located under Tab 3 of the Supporting Documents. (5) Materials to demonstrate the relationship of the elements listed in (4) preceding to surrounding area characteristics. The Drawings submitted with this Application are located under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (6) Existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan designations for the area on and around the lands proposed for Major Use Special Permit. The existing zoning designation for the property pursuant to City of Miami Ordinance No. 11000, is SD-5. Page 37 of the Zoning Atlas Map is located in Article I, Project Information,. and indicates the existing and surrounding zoning. The comprehensive plan future land use designation for the property is Office. The zoning and the comprehensive plan designation are consistent with one another. 3. Section 1702.2.2 Major Use Special Permit Concept Plan. (a) Relationships of the concept plan to surrounding, existing and proposed future uses, activities, systems, and facilities (transportation, recreation, view corridors, pedestrian systems, service systems and similar uses). Article II contains a written narrative of this project outlining proposed uses, activities and architectural character. This narrative also contains descriptions of the project's -11- 98- 786 relationship to traffic, pedestrian movements, and transportation access. Building elevations and sections showing the proposed materials, vertical profile and height, and orientation to streets is included in the List of Drawings submitted with this Application under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (b) Existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan principles and designations. This project conforms to the SD-5 overlay zoning district designated for this property. The comprehensive plan future land use designation conforms with the land use designation currently in effect for this property. 4. Section 1702.2.3 Developmental Impact Study (a) A traffic analysis shall be submitted for an area within approximately 1/4 mile of the site, or an area including the major intersections to be impacted by the site, whichever is larger. The Traffic Impact Analysis is included under Tab 2 of the Supporting Documents. (b) Economic impact data shall be provided, including estimates for construction costs, construction employment and permanent employment and shall demonstrate that the proposed development is favorable to the economy, public services, environment and housing supply of the City. The Economic Impact Study is included under Tab 4 of the Supporting Documents. A housing impact assessment. There will be 190 residential units within the development. (d) A description of proposed energy conservation measures shall be provided, including only those measures that are proposed in addition to the minimum requirements in State Energy Code. Architecturally, the building envelope will be comprised of insulated curtain wall and roof system. Tinted glass will be used throughout the building. Electronically, all exterior and landscape lighting will be controlled by means of time clocks and photocell switches. Energy saving lamps, ballasts and fixtures are being considered at cores and public spaces. -12- (e) Historic Buildings There are no existing historic structures located on the property. (f) Environmental Impacts The property is not located within an environmental preservation district. -13- TERREMARK BRICKELL II N/K/A MILLENNIUM TOWER Amendment To MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT Supporting Documents Article III. Supporting Documents Tab 1 Minority Construction Employment Plan Tab 2 Traffic Impact Analysis Tab 3 Site Utility Study Tab 4 Economic Impact Study Tab 5 Survey of Property Tab 6 Drawings 98- 786 TERREMARK BRICKELL II N/K/A MILLENNIUM TOWER Amendment to MUSP MINORITY CONSTRUCTION EMPLOYMENT PLAN May 8,1998 98 - 786 MILLENNIUM PARTNERS EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY Millennium. Partners is an equal opportunity employer that does not discriminate on the basis or race, religious creed, color, sex, national origin, age, citizenship, ancestry, familial status, veteran status, disability, sexual orientation, allenage, marital status or any other characteristic prohibited by Federal, New York State, or Iocal law. Our management team is dedicated to insuring the fulfillment of this policy with respect to hiring, placement, selection for training, promotion, transfer, demotion, layoffs, ternunation, recruitment, advertising, rates of pay or other forms of compensation and general treatment during employment. 98- '786 _. - ----.....,..., ., .---- , • �...� -.,. , ,.. - r: e v r-� �� eye �ec� INC. 2601 S. SANSHORE DR. PH-1 B, COCONUT GROVE FL 33133 PHONE (305) 856-3200 / FAX (305) 856-8190 EQUAL OPPORTUNITY STATEMENT CORPORATE STATEMENT: Terremark is committed to ensure that our organization, and the organizations with which we contract, reflect the cultural and ethnic diversity of the areas within which we operate. To this end, we warrant to administer ourselves in such a manner as to guarantee equal and fair employment practices. We shall not discriminate with regard to race, color, religion, sex, age or national origin. POLICY: Recruitment, selection, placement and layoff decisions will be based solely on a candidates or contractors job related qualifications and abilities, consistent with job requirements. All employees, job applicants and/ or contractors are guaranteed equal employment opportunity without regard for race, color, religion, sex age or national origin. Personnel policies and practices including compensation, benefits, safety and health programs will be so governed. Furthermore, all necessary steps will be taken to ensure that each employees work environment, regardless of corporate origin, is free from unlawful discrimination or harassment of any kind related to race, color, religion, sex, age or national origin. 98 - 86 &ERMELL0-AJAMIL S PARTNERS-INC A R C H I T E C T U R E E N G I N E E R I N G P L A N N I N G I N T E R I O R 0 E S I G N L A N 0 S C A P E A R C H I T E C T U R E July 28, 1997 MEMORANDUM TO: All Employees FROM: Willy A. Bermello RE: AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PLAN AS OF AUGUST 1, 1997 EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY POLICY STATEMENT: It is the policy of BERMELLO, AJAMIL & PARTNERS, INC. to base employment on merit, qualifications and competency and that its personnel practices will not be influenced by an applicant's or employee's race, color, place of birth, religion, national origin, sex, age, marital status, veteran or handicapped status. One of the management duties of all principals at BERMELLO, AJAMIL & PARTNERS, INC. is to ensure that the following personnel practices are being satisfied: 1. Take every necessary affirmative action to attract and retain qualified employees. 2. Maintain equitable principles in the recruitment, hiring, training, compensation and promotion of employees. 3. Monitor and review personnel practices to guarantee that equal opportunities are being provided to all employees. BERMELLO, AJAMIL & PARTNERS, INC. is committed to take affirmative action and aggressively pursue activities that will serve to enhance our total participation, in good faith, and enable qualified employees and applicants the .opportunities available throughout this organizat,on. Clearly, the above actions cannot be accomplished as a secondary duty for any individual despite the full support of management. And so, to scrutinize our efforts, BERMELLO, AJAMIL & PARTNERS, INC. has assigned Mr. Nelson C. Martinez, Partner / in charge of Personnel, as the Affirmative Action Director to monitor all activities of this program. ti: 2 6 0 1 SOUTH BAYSHORE DRIVE • 1 OTH FLOOR • M I A M I, F L 3 3 1 3 3 • 3 0 5 8 5 9 2 0 5 0 • FAX 3 0 5 8 5 9 9 6 3 8 AAC000412 • E30006W ba-dade@netpoint.net LCWM61 •130000610 Affirmative Action Plan Page Two Bermello, Ajamil & Partners' Affirmative Action Plan, as approved by Metropolitan Dade County, and established by the principals of the firm, is revised as the minimum effort that the firm will expend in promoting the use of disadvantaged and minority business in this community, and providing economic opportunities. The firm is and will continue to exceed the plan goals and objectives. The Affirmative Action Plan is based on the principals' belief that our Dade County community can only improve if the lifestyles of every single disadvantaged group in the community is advanced. A commitment exists from our firm that as it grows and matures, special emphasis will be sought to find and provide opportunities for professional, managerial and partnership opportunities for especially Black minorities. The firm has made positive strides in this endeavor. As one of South Florida's most diversified architectural/engineering firms, B&A has an ethnic and gender balance in the workforce that is a model for the industry: 54.1 % of its workforce is Hispanic, 7.5% is African -American, 6.0% Asian/other, and 35.5% is female, with many in senior positions. In addition, the partners of the firm "practice what they preach" by participating in community activities which are designed to promote the above stated objectives. Mr. Bermello has recently been Chairman of the Florida Commission on Human Relations, State of Florida, where in 1992 he received the Civil Rights Leadership Award for his participation in the Florida Civil Rights Act, while Mr. Ajamil has been elected to Black Economic Development Team Miami of the Beacon Council. The firm continues to support functions such as recently the Miami Negro College Fund. One of the most important things that the firm has been doing is actively seeking Black professionals in the fields of expertise that the firm is practicing. Sincerely, Vv, . Willy A. Ber ello, AIA, AICP President 11 ERMELL0-AJAMIL aPARTNERS•INC A II C H I T E C T U A E E N G I N E E R I N G ► L A N N i N G I N T E H I 0 A D E S I G N I L A N D S C A r E A II C H i 1 E C T U N E July 28, 1997 Mrs. Amparo D. Cardenas Affirmative Action Plan Coordinator Department of Business Development Metropolitan Dade County 1 1 1 N.W. 1 st Street Suite 1710 Miami, FL 33128-1975 RE: BERMELLO, AJAMIL & PARTNERS / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION CERTIFICATE NO. 94-0194 EXPIRATION DATE - 8131 /97 Dear Mrs. Cardenas: Attached is the following information to update our Affirmative Action Certificate, which expires on August 31, 1997: A. Declaration of Policy B. Memorandum to All Employees Re: Affirmative Action Policy C. Statistical Workforce Analysis D. Programmatic Activities and Goals E. Utilization of Local Black Businesses F. Grievance Procedure G. Program Reporting Sincerely, Vv � Willy A. Ber ello President 2601 SOUTH SAYSHORE DRIVE 10TH FLOOR - MIAMI FL 33133 . 305 659 2050 FAX 305 659 9639 y►//1 (f�� ..................9 S";;- • V BERMELLO-AJAMIL &PARTNERS•INC A R C H I T E C 1 U R E E N G 1 N E E A 1 N G ► L♦ N N I N G I N T E R 1 0 R 0 E S I G N L A N 0 S C►► E A R C N 1 T E C T U R E DECLARATION OF POLICY In accordance with County Ordinance 82-37, Amending Section 2-10.4 (5) (d) of the Dade County Code, BERMELLO, AJAMIL & PARTNERS, INC. affirms its commitment to submittal of an Affirmative Action Plan for the purpose of maintaining equal employment and promotional opportunity with particular emphasis on the Black work force population and utilization of Black professional firms, consultants and/or suppliers. Willy A. Ber ello Chief Execu ive Officer BERMELLO, AJAMIL & PARTNERS, INC. -4(1 Luis Ajamil Executive Vice President BERMELLO, AJAMIL & PARTNERS, INC. /-/I L"'O�A . N son 1C. Martinez Affirmative Action Officer 3ERMELLO, AJAMIL & PARTNERS, INC. made County Representing Authority IIM47 ate -7kFh7 Date '?/-Z b A� D ate Date 98 - 786 SOUTH BAYSHORE DRIVE • IOTH FLOOR • MIAMI FL 33133 • 305 859 2050 • FAX 305 659 9633 AFFIRMATIVE ACTION POLICY FOR EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY AFFIRMATIVE ACTION/ EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY - POLICY STATEMENT It is the policy of BERMELLO, AJAMIL & PARTNERS, INC. to base its hiring and promotions on merit, qualifications and competency and that its personnel practices will not be influenced by an applicant's or employee's race, color, place of birth, religion, national origin, sex, age, marital status, veteran and handicapped status. One of the management duties of all principals at BERMELLO, AJAMIL & PARTNERS, INC. is to ensure that the following personnel practices are being satisfied: 1. Take every necessary affirmative action to attract and retain qualified employees, regardless of race, color, place of birth, religion, national origin, sex, age, marital status, veteran and handicapped status. 2. Maintain equitable principles in the recruitment, hiring, training, compensation and promotion of employees. 3. Monitor and review personnel practices to guarantee that equal opportunities are being provided to all employees, regardless of race, color, place of birth, religion, national origin, sex, age, marital status, veteran and handicapped status. 3ERMELLO, AJAMIL & PARTNERS, INC. is committed to take affirmative action and aggressively pursue activities that will serve to enable all employees and applicants opportunities available throughout this organization. dearly, the above actions cannot be accomplished as a secondary duty for any individual, respite the full support of management. And so, to monitor our efforts, BERMELLO, AJAMIL PARTNERS, INC. has assigned one of its principals as the Affirmative Action Director to nonitor all activities of this program. =mployees may contact Nelson Martinez at 859-2050 regarding this Affirmative Action Policy. _ATE: July 28 1997 ;ignature/Title) , Willy Ber I IIo, Orent 11 E R M E L L 0 A J A M 1 L 3 P A R T N E R S 1 N C 98. 786 O0 oo v, oc •. oo .• o0 o O C L� en � 00 N � �.. en ccN i � G1 00 � OC ti e C1 V a O v7 C0 0 N Ln V V O O N er, O O t< U CJ N N „fn„� oo N oo `-A !T O O O .tea. !r'i z o. ri o < z O 00 U z oc ., knos°o •� o0 oc �rn G Z O G:: o Ul M rr O C o O o0 0 c-» oo Nh oc tno�o < a O O N V9 en en O O Co O O O to 00 G u N H b %n IT r'? th � o 0 o c o v en C.' .. r• v' r tn •� O � L � R V � t-r �.i :r c c:Z O O O r� EO•c.�.' E u 0 44 0 gig-I"786 PROGRAMMATIC ACTIVITIES AND GOALS RECRUITMENT/ADVERTISING All employment advertising will include a statement of Equal Employment Opportunity. In addition, advertising will utilize Hispanic and Black media (e.g. Miami Times). With respect to use of part-time college students, efforts have been made to include Black and Female candidates in the interview/hiring process (e.g. Florida Memorial College and other Black colleges). We have also printed up two brochures to distribute to colleges indicating our commitment to hire minorities. 2. HIRING PROCEDURES All positions will be filled without regard to race, color, religion, sex or national origin. BERMELLO, AJAMIL & PARTNERS, INC. is dedicated to a policy of equal employment opportunities for minorities. 3. PROMOTION PROCEDURES BERMELLO, AJAMIL & PARTNERS, INC. maintains equitable principals in the promotion of employees as stated in the Affirmative Action Plan. The Affirmative Action Plan is based on the principals' belief that our Dade County community can only improve if the lifestyles of every single disadvantaged group in the community is advanced. A commitment exists from our firm that as it grows and matures, special emphasis will be sought to find and provide opportunities for professional, managerial and partnership opportunities for all minorities. The firm has made positive strides in this endeavor. As one of South Florida's most diversified architectural/engineering firms, B&A has an ethnic and gender balance in the workforce that is a model for the industry: 54.1 % of its workforce is Hispanic, 7.5% is African -American, 6.0% Asian/other, and 35.5% is female, with many in senior positions. During the past year, we promoted within the firm two women to the position of Senior Associate, as well as four women and two African -Americans to the position of Associate. We continually monitor and review personnel practices to guarantee that equal opportunities are being provided to all employees, regardless of race, color, place of birth, religion, national origin, sex, age, marital status, veteran and handicapped status. 4. TRAINING BERMELLO, AJAMIL & PARTNERS, INC. provides training and continuing education opportu. cities to all of its employees regardless of their race, color, religion, sex or national origin. 5. PUBLICITY B&A has developed and printed an Affirmative Action brochure which we are sending to colleges throughout the -c -untry to show our commitment to hiring of minorities. In all external publicity materials, an Affirmative Action statement will be included with the printed material. In addition, where pictures are used, minorities will be included. 8 E R M E L L 0 n J A M 1 L 6 P a R T N E R 5 I N C v UTILIZATION OF LOCAL MINORITY BUSINESSES BERMELLO, AJAMIL & PARTNERS, INC. endeavors to utilize Black/Minority and Women - owned firms for printing, photography, public relations, advertising and promotion, and will continue to solicit minority firms to bid on contracts for services. (See attached listing) The following lists some of our contributions to Black minorities: • 7.5% OF B&A'S Staff is Black • B&A has contributed the following Pro -Bono work: • Overtown Advisory Board - Computerized presentation of Overtown Redevelopment Plan (10 shows) • Space Planning for City of Miami's N.E.T. office in Overtown • Douglas Apartments District Task Force - Computerized presentation • Offered mentoring and proposal coordination to Architectural Design Consortium (a Black architecture company) for the African -American Library project. Support included: - guidance with structure/composition of the team - guidance regarding doing associated homework; visiting site and personnel to determine important issues to address - format and content of the initial submittal - support/training the office person producing the submittal; frequent phone conversations - review of the submittal with suggestions for edit; actual edit of cover letter - guidance/support of technical submittal; suggestions on formatting; what/how to request info from subs; actual hands-on production and editing support - guidance on presentation content and personal presentation skills - designed and produced the multimedia presentation with our personnel and equipment - provided personnel and equipment on site for multimedia presentation • B&A Advertises in the Miami Times • B&A Participates in the SER-JOBS Program for On -The -Job Training of Minorities in entry- level positions • B&A Recruits Annually at Florida A&M's College of Architecture 8 E .R M E L L 0 A J A M I L & P A R T N E R S I N C 98 786 • Black Professional Consultants: Over the years, B&A has retained the services of the following Black professionals: George Knox, Attorney Ron Frazier Darryl Sharpton, CPA Jimmie Allen PAWA Complex Williams Russell Johnson Unison Consulting Dickey Consultants PEER Consultants Civil-Cadd, Inc. Architectural Design Consortium Jackson & Tull Chartered Engineers • Willy A. Bermello Endowed Teaching Chair Miami Dade Community College/Black or Hispanic Teacher - Fine Arts Endowment ................................ $45,000.00 • Commissioner, Florida Human Relations Commission Willy A. Bermello served (7) years as Commissioner, Florida Human Relations Commission, elected Chairman in 1992 and awarded the 1992 Civil Rights Award. • In 1996, B&A made Contributions to the following: City of Miami DDA - Urban Development Committee Florida Commission on Human Relations Hands On Miami Anti -Defamation League YWCA Belafonte Tacolcy Center Christmas Toy/Gift Collection United Way Pacesetters Partners for Safe Neighborhood YMCA/YWCA of Greater Miami Girl Scout Council of Tropical Florida New Horizons Community Mental Health Center The Salvation Army Richmond Perrine Optimist Club Boys & Girls Clubs of Miami, Inc. • In 1996 B&A has contracted the following Black Firms in Contracts Awarded to B&A: Civil Cadd - Civil Engineers / Miami Dade Water & Sewer Misc. Services, Type "B" Dickey Consultants - South Miami Community Redevelopment Agency Miami NDT - Geotechnical Engineers / Tri-Rail Misc. Services Peer Consultants - Civil Engineers / WASD Misc. Services Williams Russell & Johnson - FLL Airfield Improvements Jackson & Tull Chartered Engineers = Port of Miami, Terminal 12 Parking Garage, structural engineering services. • In 1996, B&A promoted two African -Americans to the position of Associate. B E_ R M E L L O A J A M 1 L S P A R T N E R s 1 N C 98- 786 Advanti (Printing) Contact: Glenn Diston 5624 NW 79th Ave. Miami, FL 33166 477-6010 Design & .Graphics Group, Inc. Contact: Owen Tomlinson 1244 SW 131st Ave. Miami, FL 33186 252-8737 PFAFFCO * Kimberly Pfaff 759 N.W. 24th Street Miami, FL 33127 635-0986 Universe Copy Center, Inc. ** Contact: Alberto Escarza 10700 S.W. 135th Terrace Miami, FL 33176 r 3-979 8 4 3e11ak Color Graphics ** Contact: Joe Hernandez 1=1 S.W. 8th St. NE,ami, FL 33130 ;-8525 Nancy Robinson Watson *** ?totographer z9 Ocean Drive #7-H K:-• Biscayne, FL 33149 =c 9182 Black a Hispanic ss' Female Minority Vendors (Partial List) Imprints, Design & Graphics ' Contact: Maria Salazar 11767 S. Dixie Highway #405 Miami, FL 33156 271-5404 Metropolitan Printing ** Contact: Hector Infante 3399 N.W. 72nd Ave. Miami, FL 33122 471-9826 Original Impressions ** Contact: Luis Rodriguez 12900 S.W. 89th Court Miami, FL 33176 233-1322 Almar Laminating Corp. ** Contact: Alex Rodriguez 13131 N.W.42nd Avenue Miami, FL 33054 685-6869 Ja-Mar Creations, Inc. *** Toner Cartridge Specialists 3178 Pembroke Road Hallandale, FL 33009 961-3233 Spot Color-, Printer Contact: Glen Diston 3670 Grand Avenue Coconut Grove, FL 33133 569-0038 B E R_ M E L L 0 • A J A M I L 6 P A R T N E R 5 I N C 9 8 - 786 8h UTILIZATION OF LOCAL BLACK BU6INESSLS ON DADS COUNTY WORK Amounts Paid to Minority Firms Firm Name: BERNIELLO, AJAMIL & PARTNERS, INC. Description of Date Conlract Authorized Expiration Minority 1993 - 1994 1994 - 1995 1995 - Present Award Paid Award Paid Award 1'a(d Contract Awarded Amount Work Date Firm'41)e Minority Firm Name Community Phase I - 350,000 350,000 1993 Architect Ronald E. Frazier & 60,000 60,00 Development 2/93 Architect Allen &Associates 60,000 60,000 --- --- --- --- Block Grant R-359-93 Community Phase IA $90,000 90,000 1993 Architect Ronald E. Crazier 12,500 12,500 --- - - - - Dcvclopntcnt Architect Allen etc Associates 3,600 3,600 --- --- --- '-' Block Grant R-301-92 Port of Miami 7/13/93 $6,500,000 5,440.963 1997 Financial Unison Consulting N/A 9,960 N/A 5.140 N/A 37,467 Development Consultant Program R-848-93 5,440,963 1997 Structural Jackson &- Tull _-- --- N/A 70,879 N/A 49.595 Port of Miami 7/13/93 $6,500,000 Engineers (Parking Garage) Development Program R-848-93 350,781 1997 Civil Peer Consultants --- --- 35,000 6,621 --- --- NVASD: Misc. 1111194 1,000,000 Engineers ) ng. Services Type "11" R-1654-94 — — 1VASD: Misc. 11/1/94 1,000,000 350.781 1997 Civil/Structural Civil Cadd --- Engineers Eng. Services Type "B" R-1654-94 UTILIZATION OF LOCAL WOMEN -OWNED BUSINESSES ON DADL COUNTY WORK Firm Name: BER111ELLO, AJAMIL & PARTNERS, INC. Amounls Paid to Minority Firms Descriplion of Date Contract Authorized Expiration Minority 1993 - 1994 1994 - 1995 1995 - Premil Contract Awarded Amount Work Date Firm Type Minority Firm Name Billed Award Paid Award Paid Award 1'1111 DCAD 7/7/92 2,911.175 1996 Security Alias Security N/A 2,000 N/A --- N/A Concourse "A" Systems Phase II R-789-92 1VASD: Misc. l l/I/94 1,000,000 350,781 1997 Surveyors Wcidencr Surveying --- --- N/A 61,265 --- 13,900 Gig. Services Type "R" R-1654-94 UTILIZATION Or LOCAL HISPANIGOWNIJD BUSINESSES ON DADS COUNTY WORK Firm Name: BGRNIELLO, AJAMIL & PARTNERS, INC. Amounts Paid to Minority Firms Description of Date Contract Authorized Expiration Minority 1993 - 1994 1994 - 1995 1995 - Present Contract Awarded Amount Work Dale Firm Type Minority Firm Name Award Paid Award Paid Award Paid Billed Community Phase I - $350,000 $350,000 1993 Architect R.C. Chisholm 16,000 16,000 -- --- --- Dcvelopment 2/93 Block Grant R-: 39-93 Community Phase fA $90.000 90,000 1993 Architect R.E. Chisholm Development Block Grant R-301-92 DCAD 717/92 $2,911,175 1996 Structural Eng. Donnell & Duquesne 139,978 --- 6.361 --- .4,280 Concourse "A" Phase 11 M/E Engineers SDM Engineering 201,381 79,200 N/A 195,930 R-789-92 I'm of Miami 7/13/93 $6,500,000 5,440,963 1997 Structural Eng. Donnell & Duquesne N/A 230,840 --- --- Development M/L• Engineers llufsey•Nicolaicles ram Program (Parking Garage) --- --- 12.150 --- •-- R- WASD: Misc. 1111/94 1,000,000 350.781 1997 Structural Eng. Donnell & Duquesne Eng. Services "B" M/E Engineers Ilufsey-Nicola ides N/A SSS Type R-1654-94 • ON Q� GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE It is the Firm's desire to maintain the pleasant relationship that has always existed between all members of the staff, striving to make B&A a worthwhile place of employment. Our Employee Personnel Manual states that if any misunderstanding arises, or any complaints about the condition of employment, wage rate, promotions, or any other problems should be discussed immediately with Nelson C. Martinez, Personnel Director, located on the 10th floor, or any of the Associates. 8 E R M E L L 0 A J A W. 1 L 3 P A R 7 N E R 5 1 N C 98 - 786 PROGRAM REPORTING All employment and other related statistics and/or other records relative to the Affirmative Action Plan will be available for inspection during normal working hours to appropriate County government representatives. Please contact: Mr. Nelson C. Martinez, Personnel Director Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. 2601 South Bayshore Drive 10th Floor Miami, Florida 33133 (305) 859-2050 Location of Records and Contact Person All employee personnel records and files are in the custody of Nelson C. Martinez, Personnel Director and Affirmative Action Director. a E R M E L L 0 A J A M 1 L 6 P A R T N E R 5 1 N C 98- 786 May-05-98 04:31P Gary Edward.Handel (212) 595-9032 P_O2 MEMORANDUM Gary Edward Handel + Associates 00001 a r t: h i t a c t s 1995 Broadway 4th floor New York NY 10023 tel: 212 595 4112 tat: 212 595 9032 e-mail: gehany@bway.net y To: All Employees From: Gary Edward Handel RE: AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PLAN AS OF MAY 1, 1998 Date: May 1, 1998 AFFIRMATIVE ACTION POLICY FOR EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY AFFIRMATIVE ACTION/ EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY POLICY STATEMENT: It is the policy of GARY E. HANDEL & ASSOCIATES to base its hiring and promotions on merit, qualifications and competency and that its personnel practices will not be influenced by an applicant's or employee's race, color, place of birth, religion, rational origin, sex, age, marital status, veteran or handicapped status. One of the management duties of all principals at GARY E. HANDEL & ASSOCIATES is to ensure that the following personnel practices are being satisfieJ: 1. Take every necessary affirmative action to attract and retain qualified employees regardless of race, color, place of birth, religion, national origin, sex, age, marital status, veteran and handicapped status. 2. Maintain equitable principles in the recruitment, hiring, training, compensation and promotion of employees.. 3. Monitor and review personnel practices to guarantee that equal opportunities are, being provided to all employees, regardless of race, color; place of birth, religion, national origin, sex, age, marital status, veteran and handicapped status. GARY E. HANDEL & ASSOCIATES is committed to take affirmative action and aggressively pursue activities that will serve to enable all employees.arid applicants opportunities available throughout this organization. Clearly, the above actions cannot be accomplished as a secondary duty for any individual despite the full support of management. And so, to monitor our efforts, GARY E. HANDEL & ASSOCIATES has assigned one of its principals as the Affirmative Action Director to monitor all activities of this program. Employees may contact GARY E. HANDEL regarding Affirmative Action Policy. DATE: �` t Signature/Title:C_2 98- 786 TERREMARK BRICKELL II N/K/A MILLENNIUM TOWER Amendment To MUSP TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS May 8,1998 98- 786 TERREMARK BRICKELL II - MILLENNIUM TOWER TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY SUBMITTED TO: CITY OF MIAMI PREPARED FOR: TERREMARK BRICKELL II PARTNERSHIP PREPARED BY: BERMELLO, AJAMIL & PARTNERS, INC. MAY 8,1998 98- 786 Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ...........................................................1 1.1 Background.......................................................1 1.2 Purpose of the Study ................................................ 1 1.3 Study Area........................................................3 2. EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS ............................................... 4 2.1 Existing Roadway Network ........................................... 4 2.2 Existing Traffic Volume .............................................. 4 2.3 Existing Signal Timing Plans .......................................... 7 2.4 Existing Capacity and Level of Service (LOS) ............................. 7 2.5 Transit Routes and Stations ........................................... 9 3. TRAFFIC PROTECTIONS AND IMPACTS ........................................... 12 3.1 Trip Generations .................................................. 12 3.2 Trip Distribution..................................................14 3.3 Background Traffic ................................................ 15 3.4 Committed Traffic Impact ........................................... 15 3.5 Programmed and Planned Developments ................................ 19 3.6 Project's Transportation Impacts ...................................... 19 3.7 Signal Warrant Analysis at SE 14'h Terrace and Brickell Avenue ............... 23 4. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS...............................................27 5.APPENDICES..............................................................29 Appendix 1: Brickell Bayfront Club Project PM Peak Hour Traffic Volume. Appendix 2: Intersection of Brickell Avenue and SE 15'h Road - SIG/CINEMA Analysis for 1997 Existing Conditions. Appendix 3: Intersection of Brickell Avenue and SE 13'h Street - SIG/CINEMA Analysis for 1997 Existing Conditions. Appendix 4: FDOT ART -TAB Analysis for 1997 Existing Conditions. Appendix 5: Intersection of Brickell Avenue and SE 15'h Road - SIG/CINEMA and HCM Analysis for Year 2000 Traffic Conditions. Appendix 6: Intersection of Brickell Avenue and SE 13'h Street - SIG/CINEMA and HCM Analysis for Year 2000 Traffic Conditions. Appendix 7: FDOT ART -TAB Analysis for Year 2000 Traffic Conditions. Appendix 8: Intersection of Brickell Avenue and SE 144h Terrace - HCM and TRAF- NETSIM Analysis for Year 2000 Traffic Conditions. Appendix 9: AADT Trends Within the Study Area Between 1993 and 1996. 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 BACKGROUND Terremark Brickell II partnership plans to build a 78-story building consisting of 13 floors of hotel, 37 floors of residential, and 8 floors of office. In addition, the proposed project has a six -floor parking garage, which provides for 1218 parking spaces and a recreation deck on the seventh floor. The ground floor includes retail use and a drive -through bank. The project is located in the Brickell area of Downtown Miami between Brickell Avenue to the west, SE 14' Lane to the south and SE 14t' Terrace to the north, and is enclosed by the curved road on the east. The project site is shown in Figure 1. The proposed land uses and their intensities are as shown in Table 1. Table 1: Project Land Uses and Intensities Land Use Structure Number of Units Residential 37 Floors 190 DU Hotel 13 Floors 426 Rooms Recreational 1 Floor N/A Retail Ground Floor 11,716 SF Parking Garage 6 Floors 1,151 Spaces Drive Through Teller Ground Floor 2 Lanes Office 8 Floors 243,656 SF 1.2 PURPOSE OF THE STUDY The purpose of this study is to assess the impacts of vehicular traffic on signalized intersections and roadways within the study area due to the proposed development by conducting a roadway link and signalized intersection level of service analysis. This report discusses the following items: Terremark Brickell II - Millennium Tower - Traffic Impact Study May 8, 1998 Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. 98- 786 E Flagler St Q axk SE 1 St St SE 2nd St o SE 3rd St �f� SE 4th St o ORO" ;E 5th St iE bth St 5W 7th St SW 8th St SW l Oth St All SW 13th St SIC 9 51� CP Legend Metrorail Station M7 Metromover Station F: ENG TRAM ... BRRL TRMR SITE LOtATION.COR Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. FIGURE 2601 South Bayshore Drive Terremark Brickell II Study Area and '' . t Miami, Florida 33133 Traffic Impact Study Project Site (305) 859-2050 786 0 Existing traffic volumes and levels of service for major roadways within the study area. 0 Number of trips generated by the proposed project and the distribution of these trips within the study area network. Future background and project traffic conditions and level of service. 0 Determination of whether the impacts of the proposed project exceed the City of Miami concurrency standards, and solutions to mitigate adverse impacts, if any. 1.3 STUDY AREA The study area boundary includes SW 131 Street on the north, SE 15'h Road on the south, Brickell Avenue on the west. Figure 1 shows the site location and major roadway network in the vicinity of the proposed development. Brickell Avenue provides indirect access to the site from the north and south via SE 14'' Lane and SE 14' Terrace. The project's study area intersections and roadway links to be analyzed in the vicinity of the site were identified in consultation with the City of Miami. Two signalized intersections within the study area were identified for analysis: Brickell Avenue & SE 13'' Street and Brickell Avenue & SE 151h Road. The Brickell Avenue corridor from SE 13'' Street to SE 15' Road was also identified for the link capacity analysis. The study area boundaries and intersections to be analyzed were determined using the methodology outlined in the Fortune House MUSP traffic study of 1995. Since Fortune House (a residential high-rise of 297 units) is directly across from Terremark Brickell II off SE 14'hTerrace, this provided a sound basis for study area determination and traffic analysis methodology for the Terremark Brickell II project. Terremark Brickell II - Millennium Tower - Traffic Impact Study May 8, 1998 Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. Page 3 9 -- 786 2. EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS The 1996 and 1997 existing physical and operational characteristics of the study area roadway network related to the scope of this study were collected through field visits, from Metro -Dade County Traffic Engineering Department and from the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT). Furthermore, Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. (B&A) conducted a transportation impact study for Brickell Bayfront Club (currently know as Fortune House) project in June 1995, which is in the immediate vicinity of Terremark Brickell II project. The Brickell Bayfront project is located on Brickell Avenue between SE 14'h Street and SE 14' Terrace. As such, and in consultation with the City of Miami, the 1995 Brickell Bayfront Club study was used as another source of information, as needed. 2.1 EXISTING ROADWAY NETWORK Within the study area, Brickell Avenue is a four -lane divided arterial with high signal density. The roadway provides left -turn bays at signalized and unsignalized intersections. SE 15th Road is four - lane divided west of Brickell Avenue and two-lane divided east of Brickell Avenue. Coral Way (SE 13' Street) is a four -lane undivided arterial within the study area, and other local roadways are two- lane undivided. Parking was observed on both sides of South East Bayshore Drive, on SE 14g' Street, SE 14'' Terrace and SE 15'hRoad. The existing roadway geometric configurations -for intersections, connecting roadways and existing on -street parking are shown in Figure 2. 2.2 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUME A review of the existing FDOT and Metro -Dade County traffic counts within the study area and the vicinity was conducted. There are only four FDOT count stations within the study area and vicinity. The most updated, 1996, peak hour volume, average annual daily traffic (AADT) volume, peak hour factors (PHF), and directional split factors (D) were obtained from the Florida Department of Terremark Brickell II - Millennium Tower - Traffic Impact Study May 8, 1998 B xmello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. Page 4 98- 786% SE 13th St S 12th 1 �qj C� Sf STATION h& LEGEND ON STREET PARKING A� LANE CONFIGURATION Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. 2601 South Bayshore Drive Terremark Brickell II Signalized Intersections FIGURE Miami, Florida 33133 Traffic Impact Study Lane Configuartionslot 2 (305) 859-2050 98- 786 Transportation, Planning Division of District Six In the 1995 Brickell Bayfront Club study the PM peak hour turning movement traffic was counted at the two signalized intersections within the study area (see Appendix 1). These intersections are Brickell Avenue & SW 13'h Street and Brickell Avenue & SE 15" Road. At the time the aforementioned study was conducted, there was roadway construction along Brickell Avenue and Brickell Bridge over the Miami River. As such, traffic volume and turning movement counts along Brickell Avenue and, especially, at the intersection of SE 13' Street and Brickell Avenue were impacted by the construction and closure of the Brickell Bridge. A review of the AADT volumes from FDOT count stations within the study area indicated that between 1995 and 1996 there was a 25 percent increase along SE 13' Street. However, the traffic volume increase along Brickell Avenue between 1995 and 1996 ranged from 10 percent south of SW 15'' Road to 66 percent north of SE 13' Street. This sharp increase in traffic volume over a one year span was due to the resumption of pre -construction traffic patterns after the end of construction and re -opening of the Brickell Bridge. A review of traffic volume trends from count stations between 1993 (before construction) and 1996 (after construction) within the study area indicated that traffic volumes over this period did not increase, i.e., the 1996 AADT volumes are less than or equal to the 1993 AADT volumes. The 1996 traffic volume within the study area regressed to approximately the 1993 traffic volume level, see Appendix 9. PM peak hour volumes for eastbound, northbound, and southbound approaches at the intersection of Brickell Avenue and SE 13°i Street were obtained from the FDOT traffic count stations in the immediate vicinity. However, there is no count station that accounts for the westbound approach traffic volume approach at this intersection. In addition, traffic count stations within the study area are relatively remote from the intersection of SE 15'h Road and Brickell Avenue and, therefore, would not accurately account for approaches's traffic volumes. As previously mentioned, the 1996 AADT volume along SE 13'1 Street increased by 25 percent compared to the previous year's. The AADT volumes at the count station adjacent to the intersection Terremark Brickell U - Millennium Tower - Traffic Impact Study May 8, 1998 Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. Page 6 98- 786 of SE 151h Street and Brickell Avenue increased by 10 percent. Therefore, the PM peak hour traffic volumes reported in Brickell Bayfront Club report for westbound SE 13`h Street and the intersection of SE 151h Road and Brickell Avenue approaches were increased by 25 percent and 10 percent, respectively to calculate the 1996 PM peak volumes. The turning -volume percentages reported in the 1995 Brickell Bayfront Club study were maintained for most of the turning volumes. This was determined in consultation with the City of Miami. The southbound traffic percent right -turn for Brickell Avenue at SE 13`h Street in 1995 was found to be high because of construction and closure of the Brickell Bridge. To address this, the count station (Station #86) located at SE 131h Street immediately west of Brickell Avenue was looked into for its westbound traffic volume data. This data was used to balance westbound volume along SE 13`h Street with the intersection's turning volumes as calculated above. In other words, the 1996 Brickell Avenue southbound right -turn volume was calculated by subtracting from Station #86 westbound traffic the 1996 PM peak northbound left -turn and westbound through traffic. The Brickell Bayfront Club study established that the natural annual traffic growth rate for the Brickell area was two percent. Therefore, the 1997 existing traffic volumes for the study area intersections were determined by increasing the 1996 traffic volume by 2%. The 1997 existing traffic volumes are shown in Figure 3. 2.3 EXISTING SIGNAL TIMING PLANS Existing signal timing plans for the signalized intersections identified in the study area were obtained from the Dade County Traffic Control Center. The timing plans were used in analyzing existing levels of service. Existing signal timings are shown in Appendices 2 and 3. 2.4 EXISTING CAPACITY AND LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) Roadway capacity is the maximum number of vehicles that can pass a given point during a specific period under prevailing roadway, traffic, and control conditions. The Metro -Dade County Traffic Engineering Department also adopts the roadway capacity as the service volume at level of service Terremark Brickell II - Millennium Tower - Traffic Impact Study May 8, 1998 Bert- hello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. Page 7 98- '786 �32 , tj v- 3't6 SE 13th St SE 12th Teri 1a� 138 --? n1�N N � r S� Ccv sr LEGEND � Hourly Traffic Volume ntNb\IKAKS\•-\6KKL TKMKK\Exist YOlun*.CDA Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. FIGURE 2601 South Bayshore Drive Terremark Brickell 11 1997 ExistingPM Peak f Miami, Florida 33133 Traffic Impact Study Hour Traffic Volume 3 (305)859-2050 98786 "E." The level of service (LOS) is a qualitative measure that characterizes operational conditions within a traffic stream and their perception by motorists and passengers. The 1994 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) defines six levels of service, with LOS "A " representing the best operating conditions and LOS "F" representing the worst. The existing level of service for roadway segments and intersections were calculated according to the HCM procedure using the SIG/CINEMA software. Arterial levels of service were calculated using the FDOT ART -TAB program. As per the ART -TAB analysis shown in Appendix 4 and the 1995 Florida Generalized LOS Tables, the roadway capacities within the study area are 4,170 vehicles per hour (VPH) for Brickell Avenue and 3,160 VPH for SE 13'hStreet (Coral Way). The summary of existing roadway levels of service, within the study area, during the PM peak -hour, are shown in Figure 4. Detailed LOS analyses are provided in Appendices 2, 3, and 4. The City of Miami transportation concurrency standards are based on the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan (MCNP). This document sets the roadway level of service standard at LOS "E" within the City of Miami in general. However, the Downtown Miami roadways are governed under a Special Transportation Area (STA), which allows for 20% of signalized intersections within the Downtown Miami DRI area (within STA) to operate below LOS "E." The intersection of SE 13' Street & Brickell Avenue is operating below LOS "E" for 1997 conditions. This, in large part, is due to the permissive only phase for northbound left turn and insufficient green time available for westbound through movement. As for arterial analysis, northbound as well as southbound traffic of Brickell Avenue is operating at good levels of service, LOS "C" and LOS "B," respectively. This is due to sufficient green time (g/C) for through movements along Brickell Avenue at both existing signalized intersections. 2.5 TRANSIT ROUTES AND STATIONS The project area is served by Metromover which has a station located on SE le Street and is 5 to 10 minutes walking distance from the proposed development. Also Brickell Avenue is served by bus routes B, 48, and 24. Each Metromover car has a capacity of 75 persons and each Metrobus has Terremark Brickell II - Miller nium Tower - Traffic Impact Study May 8, 1998 Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, a)r-. Page 9 9$-- 786 LEGEND • Intersection LOS "F" I(Atersection LOS "A" Arterial Directional LOS "B" Arterial Directional LOS "C" F.\ENG\TtkNA-.\BRRL TRMRI\Exi t LOi.COR logBermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. 1997 Existing PM FIGURE 2601 South Bayshore Drive Terremark Brickell II peak -Hour Level Miami, Florida 33133 Traffic Impact Study 4 (305) 859-2050 of Service (LOS) 98786 seating capacity of 40 persons. Currently, the City of Miami is using 150% of seated capacity for Metrobuses as LOS standard. Metromover runs at headways of 3 minutes during peak hours and 5 minutes during off peak periods. Metrobus routes run at headways ranging from 15-60 minutes during peak hours to 30-60 minutes during off peak periods. This extensive transit network within the vicinity of the development is of great importance for future residents, employees and visitors to the development who would have an excellent access to transit services. This will decrease the impact of the development on the study area roadways as people would have access to transit services and could use them instead of private automobiles. Terremark Brickell II - Millennium Tower - Traffic !: pact Study May 8, 1998 Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. Page 11 98- 786 3. TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS AND IMPACTS 3. 1 TRIP GENERATION The Terremark Brickell II project proposed plan is to establish hotel, retail, drive -through bank, office, and residential developments as described in Table 1 of Section 1. The Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Trip Generation Manual 6'h Edition was used to determine the number of PM peak -hour trips that would be generated by the proposed project. The PM peak period is more critical than the AM peak in Downtown Miami area due to the heavy commute patterns; therefore, traffic analysis was conducted for the PM peak period. A Metromover station at Brickell Avenue and SW 14' Street is adjacent to the project site, within 5 to 10 minutes walking -distance. Brickell Avenue is well served by the Metrobus routes, as discussed before. The 1989 Downtown Miami Master Plan estimated the transit ridership for the Brickell area to be approximately 10 percent. Because the proposed project is a multi -use development some of the trips generated by this project would be internal to the site. The ITE Trip Generation Manual allows for the reduction of trip generation rates to account for internal trips associated with a multi -use development. The ITE Manual further suggests adjusting external trips in central business districts (CBD) to account for transit, pass -by, and walking trips. These factors were applied to calculate the net external trips generated by the project. The FDOT Planning Division, District VI most recently suggested particular external trip adjustment factors for the Brickell Square project, which is located just south of SE 13* Street and is in close proximity to the proposed Terremark Brickell II project site. The Brickell Square project is also a multi -use development that contains hotel, residential, retail, and office developments. Since both projects are in the same area and have similar types of developments, the factors suggested by the FDOT for the Brickell Square project were used for the proposed Terremark Brickell II project. These factors are summarized in Table 2. Terremark Brickell II - Millennium Tower - Traffic Impact Study May 8, 1998 Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. Page 12 98 - 786 Table 2: Terremark Brickell U External Trip Adjustment Factors Land Use % Internal % Transit I % Pass -By %Walking I Total Percentage Retail') 10 5 10 2 27 Office(') 0 10 0 0 10 Hotel(') 5 5 0 0 10 Residential(') 0 5 0 0 5 Bank() 0 0 0 0 0 (1) Factors were suggested by the FDOT Planning Office, District VI for the Brickell Square project. (2) A bank was not part of the Brickell Square project and, therefore, there were no factors associated with it. A zero external trip adjustment factor was assumed for the bank component of the Terremark Brickell H project. The net external trips generated by the proposed project were calculated for each land use by after applying the total external trip adjustment factors (as per Table 2) to the total trips generated as per the ITE Trip Generation Manual. A summary of net the external trips for the proposed project is shown in Table 3. The bank element of the proposed project is a drive -through only without walk-in services. The ITE Manual does not provide trip generation rates for banks with drive -through only services. Therefore, traffic counts at a similar facility, the Florida International Bank in Coconut Grove were obtained. At Florida International Bank drive -through facility with two lanes, 140 vehicles per day are generated on a typical day with a peak -hour during lunch time. Information about the PM peak -hour traffic volume at Florida International Bank facility was not available. As per the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 6't" Edition, the ratio of the PM peak -hour trips to the daily trips (K-Factor) generated by a drive-in bank is approximately 15 percent. As such, the PM peak -hour trip generation for the drive - through bank service was calculated to be 21 vehicles per hour. As shown in Table 3, the total PM peak hour external inbound and outbound trips for the project were 230 and 388 trips, respectively. Terremark Brickell II - Millennium Tower - Traffic Impact Study May 8, 1998 Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. Page 13 98- 7866 Table 3: Terremark Brickell II Project Trip Generation(t) Land Use Intensity ITE Code PM Peak(') Net External PM Peak") Weekday Trips Net External Weekday Trips (2) In Out Total In Out Total Hotel 426 Rooms 310 140 124 264 126 112 237 3,443 3,099 Residential 190 DU 222 44 28 72 42 27 69 926 880 Retail 6,696 SF 814 7 10 17 5 7 13 272 199 Office 205,200 SF 710 53 257 309 47 231 278 2,305 2,074 Bank Drive Through Lanese 2 Lanes 912 10 11 21 10 11 21 140 140 Total 1 254 430 683 230 388 1 618 7,086 6,392 (1) As per the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 6' Edition, 1997. (2) Net external trips = Total trips x (1 - External Trip Adjustment Factor) (3) Number of trips generated by the bank drive -through lanes were estimated from a traffic count conducted at a similar type facility where two-lane drive -through bank windows generated 140 vehicles per day. The ITE Trip Generation Manual reports that the average PM peak -hour to daily trip ratio (K-Factor) for banks with drive-in is approximately 15 percent. 3.2 TRIP DISTRIBUTION Metropolitan Dade County, Public Works Department maintains historical data trends on directional trip distribution for locations within the county, referred to as "Cardinal Trip Distribution. " The quadrants are divided into eight directions: NNE, ENE, ESE, SSE, SSW, WSW, WNW, and NNW. The Cardinal Trip Distribution (CTD) provides percentages of trips originated at each Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) to every one of the above directions. The proposed project lies within Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) 670. The cardinal trip distributions for TAZ 670 were NNE = 19%, ENE = 4%, ESE = 0%, SSE = 1%, SSW = 2%, WSW = 23%, WNW = 21%, and NNW = 30. Dividing this into four quadrants yields to the following distributions: north = 49%, east = 4%, south = 3%, and west 44%. The traffic impact study prepared for the Brickell Bayfront Club, which is also located in the same TAZ and analyzed the same study area, distributed project trips based on the CTD. Therefore, the Terremark Brickell H - Millennium Tower - Traffic Impact Study May 8, 1998 Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. - -2age 14 98- 786 same trip distribution percentages were used for this study as well. Trip distribution percentages and number of trips within the study area are shown in Figures 5 and 6, respectively. 3.3 BACKGROUND TRAFFIC The project's study area (Brickell) is within the Downtown Miami DRI boundaries and is well built out. Therefore, limited traffic growth is expected in this area. The Brickell Bayfront Club study established a 2% annual growth rate for the same study area, which is relatively high for such a built out area. A conservative approach was followed and a 2% annual growth rate was used for this study to project future traffic volumes. The project's opening year is 2000. Therefore, the projected PM peak hour traffic volume for the study area was calculated as follows: V012000 = V011997 X 0 + 0.02)3 3.4 COMMITTED TRAFFIC IMPACT In Downtown Miami and the Brickell area there are other developments previously approved but not yet completed. One such development is the Brickell Bayfront Club (Fortune House), adjacent to the proposed project site (as shown in Figure 7). This project has a direct contribution to the future traffic in the area. At the present time, this project is under construction. The Brickell Bayfront Club project trips, as distributed in the 1995 report, were added to the year 2000 background trips. The year 2000 PM peak hour background plus committed trips are shown in Figure 7 The impacts of background and committed PM peak hour traffic were analyzed according to the HCM procedures using SIG/CINEMA and FDOT LOS Software. It was found that the intersection of Brickell Avenue and SE 13'h Street would operate at LOS "F" while the intersection of Brickell Avenue and SE 15'h Road would operate at LOS `B" with the existing (1997) signal timing plans. Terremark Brickell H - Millennium Tower - Traffic Impact Study May 8, 1998 Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. Page 15 98- 786 LEGEND 9�/10 Percent Project Trip Distribution 10 Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. FIGURE 2601 South Bayshore Drive Terremark Brickell II Project's Trip Miami, Florida 33133 Traffic Impact Study Distribution By Percent 5 (305) 859-2050 �8- 786 LEGEND 4371- Project's PM Peak -Hour Egress Trips 198 Project's PM Peak -Hour Ingress Trips FAENGITRANSL Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. Distribution of PM Peak FIGURE 2601 South Bayshore Drive Terremark Brickell II Miami, Florida 33133 Hour Egress/Ingress Traffic Impact Study 6 (305) 859-2050 1 1 Project Trips - 786 -o dQ. LEGEND 1024 Background PM Peak -Hour Traffic Volume +46 Committed PM Peak -Hour Traffic Volume F.\ENRTRANS\-.\BRRL TRMRR\BGC Velume.OR Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. Year 2000 Background FIGURE 2601 South Bayshore Drive Terremark Brickell II Plus Committed PM Miami, Florida 33133 Traffic Impact Study 7 (305) 859-2050 Peak Hour Traffic Volume 98 - 786 The operating level of service for northbound Brickell Avenue between SE 15" Road and SE 13" Street would be LOS "C" and for southbound Brickell Avenue between SE 13'h Street and SE 15" Road the LOS would be "B." The resulting future intersection and arterial levels of service are shown in Figure 8. Detailed intersection and arterial LOS analyses are included in Appendices 5, 6 and 7. 3.5 PROGRAMMED AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS The 1998 Metro -Dade Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), the 2015 Metro -Dade Transportation Plan Long Range Element, and the 1996 Metro -Dade Transit Development Program were reviewed to identify any programmed or planned projects within the study area that may have an impact related to the scope of the proposed project. The above documents showed no programmed or planned projects within the study area. 3.6 PROJECT'S TRANSPORTATION IMPACTS The proposed development is expected to be open in early year 2000. Future traffic volumes including background traffic plus committed development traffic plus project traffic were calculated, as shown in Figure 9. These volumes were then used to determine intersection and arterial levels of service. At the present time, without project, traffic operation conditions at the intersection of Brickell Avenue and SE 13" Street are within the City of Miami standards. However, as previously noted, two of the intersection's approaches operate at LOS "F." Therefore, signal timing optimization analysis was performed for the intersections of SE 13" Street and SE 15" Road using the SIG/CINEMA program. A link analysis, along Brickell Avenue using the optimized signal timing, was then performed using the 1995 FDOT ART -TAB Program. Appendices 5, 6 and 7 contain intersection and arterial analyses for future background plus committed plus project traffic conditions. Summary of intersection and link LOS results are shown in Figure 10. Terremark Brickell II - Millennium Tower - Traffic Impact Study May 8, 1998 Bermello, Ajamil & Partners. Inc. Page 19 98- 786 LEGEND • Intersection LOS T" 0 Intersection LOS "B" Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. 2601 South Bayshore Drive Terremark Brickell II : Miami, Florida 33133 Traffic Impact Study (305) 859-2050 Arterial Directional LOS "B" Arterial Directional LOS "C" i\nUS\—\BAKL TRMAK\20BK6round LOSIR Year 2000 Background FIGURE Traffic LOS During The PM Peak Period $ SE 13th St _ LEGEND ro 1421 +99 1421 is the Background + Committed Traffic Volume + 99 is the Project's Directional Traffic Volume F:IENGITRANtl..ORKL_TRMRKIBG+Com+Proj_Volume.CDR Bermello, Ajamil &Partners, Inc. Year 2000 PM Peak -Hour FIGURE 2601 South Bayshore Drive Terremark Brickell II Miami, Florida 33133 Background + Committed � - Traffic Impact Study + (305) 859-2050 Project Traffic Volume 9 LEGEND • Intersection LOS "F" 0 Intersection LOS " B° Arterial Directional LOS "B" Arterial Directional LOS "D" FAENGITRANSG.AnKL_TRMM20BRG +Proj_LOS.CDR Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. Year 2000 Background + 2601 South Bayshore Drive Terremark Brickell II project Traffic Optimized Miami, Florida 33133 Traffic Impact Study (305) 859-2050 1 1 PM Peak Hour LOS FIGURE 10 786 The analysis shows that the intersection of Brickell Avenue and SE 15`' Road, with its current signal timing, is operating at the optimum. Minimum green time (7 seconds) is provided for the cross street traffic (along SE 15"' Road), which carries minimal traffic volume. The remaining green time within the cycle (98 seconds) is provided for Brickell Avenue, which carries the majority of traffic. In the year 2000, including background traffic, committed development traffic and project traffic, the intersection will operate at LOS `B". The analysis also shows that, in the year 2000, including background traffic, committed development traffic and project traffic, the intersection of Brickell Avenue and SE 13' Street, with its current signal timing, will not operate at its optimum. Therefore, the signal timing and phasing at the intersection of Brickell Avenue and SE 136' Street were modified to develop the optimal setting to maximize turning movements throughput without adversely impacting the progression and LOS along Brickell Avenue. Due to the heavy northbound left -turn volume (424 VPH) along Brickell Avenue at SE 13m Street, an exclusive (protected) left turn phase was added to reduce the movement's excessive delay. Even with these modifications, the eastbound and westbound approaches (SE 13`h Street/SE 12' Terrace) would, however, operate at LOS "F" and the overall intersection LOS would be "F". Signal analysis details are included in Appendices 5 and 6. As for level of service along Brickell Avenue, as presented in Figure 10, the ART -TAB analysis shows that, in the year 2000, including background traffic, committed development traffic and project traffic, the northbound traffic would operate at LOS "D" and the southbound traffic would operate at LOS `B". 3.7 SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS AT SE 14TH TERRACE AND BRICKELL AVENUE Trip distribution analysis shows that the majority of trips generated by both the Brickell Bayfront Club project and the proposed project (Terremark Brickell II) would use SE 141h Terrace as the main access road. This will result in a high southbound left-tum volume and a high westbound right- turn volume conflicting with Brickell Avenue's high through traffic volume. A summary of the PM peak Terremark Brickell H - Millennium 'Lower - Traffic Impact Study May 8, 1998 Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. Page 23 58-- 796 hour turning volumes and lane configurations at the intersection of SE 14'hTerrace and Brickell Avenue is shown in Figure 11. There are two issues associated with the accommodation of southbound left -turn volumes. The first is to accommodate their storage and the second is to have a sufficient number of acceptable gaps in the opposing northbound Brickell Avenue traffic. The availability of gaps, together with the rate of arrival of the southbound left -turn traffic, will impact the operating queue for left -turn traffic, and its consequential impact on the southbound through traffic along Brickell Avenue. Since there are no left -turn signal warrant analysis methodologies recommended by the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) and FDOT, it is appropriate to determine the necessity of a left -turn signal based on the knowledge of field operation conditions and roadway geometry in place. Investigation of traffic operations at the above -mentioned intersection indicated that there is a need to control the turning vehicles by a traffic signal. This signal will facilitate processing the high volume of left -turn traffic from Brickell Avenue and right -turn traffic from SE 14"' Terrace. Signal design analysis at this intersection was performed to determine signal phasing and timing and to ensure compliance with the FDOT policy of maintaining progression along Brickell Avenue. Detailed analysis of signal timing and phasing are included in Appendix 8. The existing left -turn lane at Brickell Avenue has an approximate storage of 100 feet, which can provide storage for up to five vehicles. An analysis was performed using the TRAF-NETSIM simulation model to estimate the maximum and average queue lengths and storage length needed for the Brickell Avenue southbound left-tum lane. The analysis shows that, to maintain the maximum left - turn queue length to five vehicles or less, a long (more than 40 seconds) protective left turn phase should be provided. However, to maintain good progression and increase bandwidth for Brickell Avenue northbound traffic, the length of the left -turn lane was increased to 175 feet (which can accommodate up to nine vehicles). Signal phase timing based on the new length was then recalculated. The simulation analysis showed that providing a 24 second protective left -turn phase will maintain the maximum queue length Terremark Brickell II - Millennium Tower - Traffic Impact Study May 8, 1998 Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. Page 24 98- 786 LEGEND 7500. Backgroung + Committed + Project's PM Peak -Hour Traffic Volume F iENG1TRANSl..1BRKL_TRMRMs ignal_design.CDR Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. Project's Main Access FIGURE 2601 South Bayshore Drive Terremark Brickell II Lane Confi llr f : Miami, Florida 33133 Traffic Impact Study 9 ation �1 (305) 859-2050 and Traffic Volume 98- 786 of eight vehicles, with the average queue length of two vehicles. A summary of HCM and TRAF- NETSIM results are included in Appendix 8. The analysis shows that, in the year 2000, including background traffic, committed development traffic and project traffic, the overall intersection will operate at LOS `S" and the level of service of the approaches will operate from LOS `S" to "E," all of which is within the City of Miami transportation concurrency limits. Terremark Brickell II - Millennium Tower - Traffic Impact Study May 8, 1998 Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. Page 26 4. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS ❑ The proposed project is located in Brickell area of Downtown Miami. The proposed development has 426 hotel rooms, 190 residential units, 205,200 square feet of office space, 6,696 square feet of gross retail area, and a two-lane drive -through only service bank, in addition to a six -story parking garage and one floor recreational facilities. ❑ The Brickell Bayfront Club project (currently known as Fortune House), which is currently under construction and will be open by early 1998, is in the immediate vicinity to the project site. This project contributes directly to the transportation impacts in the vicinity of the proposed project. Therefore, the Brickell Bayfront Club project was considered in this analysis as a committed development. ❑ Inventory of the existing physical and operational conditions within the study area related to the scope of this project has been collected from the Metro -Dade County, Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), and field visits. The study area roadways and intersection PM peak hour traffic volumes were determined from FDOT traffic count stations and from Brickell Bayfront Club study report, 1995, which was in consultation with the City of Miami. The project is expected to be operational in January, 2000. A conservative 2% annual traffic growth rate was used for the study area. ❑ Analysis of PM peak hour existing traffic conditions for signalized intersections and roadway links within the study area showed that, except for northbound left -turn traffic along Brickell Avenue at SE 13'h Street, all other approach movements and roadways currently operate within the City of Miami transportation concurrency limits (LOS "E"). The intersection of Brickell Avenue and SE 15te Road currently operates at level of service (LOS) "A" and the intersection of Brickell Avenue and SE 13t' Street currently operates at LOS "F", which is still within the City of Miami transportation concurrency limits (up to 20% of signalized intersections can operate below LOS "E"). Brickell Avenue northbound currently operates at LOS "C" and Brickell Avenue southbound currently operates at LOS `B." Terremark Brickell II - Millennium Tower - Traffic Impact Study May 8, 1998 Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. Page 27 D The Terremark Brickell U proposed project would generate net external traffic of approximately 6,391 vehicles per day and 718 vehicles per PM peak -hour, which is the critical period. The PM peak -hour inbound/outbound percent split was calculated to be 37/63. ❑ The proposed project's vehicular trips were distributed according to the Brickell Bayfront Club study which was based on the "Cardinal Trip Distribution" provided by Metropolitan Dade County Public Works Department and access constraints. ❑ Analysis of future conditions in the year 2000 including background traffic plus committed development traffic plus proposed project traffic shows that signal timing and phasing at Brickell Avenue and SE 13'h Street needs to be optimized to improve traffic conditions at this intersection and reduce excessive delays in the northbound direction. As such, the signal phasing at this intersection was optimized, and the existing three-phase signal was modified to a four -phase signal as shown in Appendix 6. The optimized signal timing plan would improve traffic operation along Brickell Avenue as well as the overall intersection level of service. ❑ Trip distribution analysis shows that SE 14°i Terrace provides the major access roadway from Brickell Avenue to both Terremark Brickell R and Fortune House projects. This would result in a high southbound Brickell Avenue left -turn volume and a high westbound SE 141' Terrace right -turn volume at the intersection of Brickell Avenue and SE 141h Terrace. There are no left -turn volume signal warrants recommended by the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) or. FDOT. However, because of the limited availability of gaps in the northbound Brickell Avenue high volume traffic, together with the high rate of arrival of the southbound Brickell Avenue left-tum traffic, it was determined that a new traffic signal at this intersection is needed. TRAF-NETSIM analysis was conducted at this intersection to determine the left turn lane storage length to prevent spill back along Brickell Avenue. The TIAF-NETSIM analysis indicated that a 175 feet length is needed to provide sufficient storage length for the maximum southbound left turn traffic queue and to keep a good progression for northbound Brickell Avenue traffic. Terremark Brickell II - Millennium Tower - Traffic Impact Study May 8, ? 998 bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. Pagc 28 98- 786 5. APPENDICES Appendix 1: Brickell Bayfront Club Project PM Peak Hour Traffic Volume. Appendix 2: Intersection of Brickell Avenue and SE 15' Road - SIG/CINEMA Analysis for 1997 Existing Conditions. Appendix 3: Intersection of Brickell Avenue and SE 13' Street - SIG/CINEMA Analysis for 1997 Existing Conditions. Appendix 4: FDOT ART -TAB Analysis for 1997 Existing Conditions. Appendix 5: Intersection of Brickell Avenue and SE 15' Road - SIG/CINEMA and HCM Analysis for Year 2000 Traffic Conditions. Appendix 6: Intersection of Brickell Avenue and SE 13'' Street - SIG/CINEMA and HCM Analysis for Year 2000 Traffic Conditions. Appendix 7: FDOT ART -TAB Analysis for Year 2000 Traffic Conditions. Appendix 8: Intersection of Brickell Avenue and SE 14`h Terrace - HCM and TRAF- NETSIM Analysis for Year 2000 Traffic Conditions. Appendix 9: AADT Trends Within the Study Area Between 1993 and 1997. fA... \brld tennrkvevtis.wpd Terremark Brickell II - Millennium Tower - Traffic Impact Study May 8, 1998 Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. Page 29 Appendix 1: Brickell Bayfront Club Project PM Peak Hour Traffic Volume. 98- 786 '24W 55(L) SE 13th St . . ..... 126 2�a': 2 39 (R 441 -7 Zz. IAETRCAACVER.: 74, z mz 5r 7� '7' .. ....... .. 7 M- Shared lert, tum lane (R)-- Shared right tum lane FIGURE 3 1995 EXISTING VOLUMES FOR P.M. PEAK HOUR BEP,MELLO, AJAMIL & PARTNERS, INC. BRICKELL BAY FRONT CLUB 91f 9 P R I Ivi,16 1 0 Appendix 2: Intersection of Brickell Avenue and SE 15' Road - SIG/CINEMA Analysis for 1997 Existing Conditions. 98- 786 98- 788 ;IG/Cinema V1.0 ORGANIZATION: B & A PAR ZRS, INC. ,E 15TH RD © BRICKELL AVE, .v0 PEDS SE 15TH RD /BRICKELL AVE Page-1 i,NTIFYING INFORMATION EAST APPROACH: SE 15TH RD NORTH APPROACH: BRICKELL AVE WEST APPROACH: SE 15TH RD SOUTH APPROACH: BRICKELL AVE ANALYST: Khaled Al-Sahili ANALYSIS DATE: 7/29/97 ANALYSIS PERIOD: PM PEAK BACKGROUND CASE: EXT15RD1 INTERSECTION GEOMETRY LANE LEFT TURN RIGHT TURN APPROACH OUTBOUND LENGTH ----POCKET--- ----POCKET--- APP. LANES. LANES ----- (FEET) LANES ------ (FEET) LANES (FEET) ---- EB ----- 2 2 ----- 600 0 ---=-- ----- ------ 0 0 0 'WE 2 2 400 0 0 0 0 NB 3 2 600 1 100 0 0 SB 3 2 600 1 100 0 0 MOVEMENTS SERVICED BY LANE AND LANE WIDTHS (FEET) LANE 1 LANE 2 LANE 3 LANE 4 LANE 5 LANE••6 APP. MOV. WIDTH ---------- MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH ---- EB LT 12.0 ---------- TR 12.0 ---------- ---------- -------------------- -3 LT 9.0 TR 9.0 3 L 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 SB L 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 L - EXCLUSIVE LEFT TURN T - EXCLUSIVE THROUGH LT - LEFT TURN / THROUGH TR - THROUGH / RIGHT TURN LR - LEFT TURN / RIGHT TURN R - EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TURN LTR - LEFT TURN / THROUGH / RIGHT TURN TRAFFIC VOLUMES CURRENT TRAFFIC VOLUMES (VPH) GROWTH FACTORS APP. ---- LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR LEFT THRU RIGHT EB ---- 15 ---- 43 ----- 45 ---- 10 ---- 1.0.0 ---- 1.00 ----- 1.00 WB 34 43 13 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 NB 4a 965 51 10 1.00 1.00 1.00 SB 44 '2034 43 20 1.00 1.00 1.00 MOVEMENT VOLUMES (VPH) ---------------------- APP. LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR B 15 43 45 10 rTB 34 43 13 0 ,r NB 48 965 51 10 SB 44 2034 43 20 PEAK HOUR FACTORS ----------------- LEFT THRU RIGHT 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.96 0.96 0.96 98- 786 IG/Cinema VI-0 ORGANIZATION: B & A P.A-R N Z- RS , INC. E 15T'ri RD Q BRICKELL AVE, > PEDS SE 15TH RD / LCKELL AVE Page-2 gIGNAL SETTINGS - OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS CONTROL TYPE : SEMI -ACTUATED PHASING: MOVEMENTS SERVICED APP. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB LTP yIB LTP NB LTP SE LTP L=Left Turn; T=Through; R=Right, no Peds; P=Right w Ped conflict TIMING BY PHASE (SECONDS) ------------------------------------------- 2 2 --- 3 4 5 ----------------------- 6 7 8 Green --- 98.0 --- 7.0 --- 0.0 0.0 --- 0.0 --- 0.0 --- 0.0 --- 0.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 All Red 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 DURATION OF PEDESTRIANN ONLY PHASE (SECS) 0 CYCLE LENGTH (SECS) 115.0 LOST TIME PER P.=z.SE (SECS) 2.0 TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY CONDITIONS AREA TYPE - C'SD EAST L T R HEAVY VEHICLES 0 0 0 PLATOON ARRIVAL TYPE 3 3 3 CONFLICTING PEDESTRIANTS/HOUR PERCENT GRADE CURB PARKING NUMBER OF PARKING MANEUVERS/HOUR NUMBER OF BUSES STOPPING/HOUR PEDESTRIAN BUTTON MINIMUM GREEDY TIME FOR PEDESTRIANS WEST NORTH SOUTH L T R L T R L T R --- --- --- --- 0 0 0 --- --- --- 0 2 0 --- --- 0 2 0 3 3 3. 3 3 3 3 3 3 EAST WEST NORTH SOUTH 50 50 50 50 0 0 0 0 N Y Y Y 0 20 20 20 0 0 0 0 N N N N 20.0 20.0 15.9 15.9 98- 786 iG/Cinena V1.0 - ORGANIZATION: B & A PARTNERS, INC. 5 15TH' RD @ BRICKELL AVE, Y- PEDS SE 15TH RD /B- CKELL AVE, Page-3 VOLUME ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET _ p g Peak Lane U v Current Mvt Mvt Group Lane Adj. Vol Growth Vol Flow Lane Flow N Util Flow Proportion op Mvt (vph) Factor (vph) PKF (vph) Grp. (vph) Lns Fact (vph) LT RT 3 L 15 1.00 15 0.85 18 LTR 110 2 1.05 115 0.16 0.37 T 43 1.00 43 0.85 51 R 45 1.00 45 0.85 41+ 3 L 34 1-.00 34 0.85 40 LTR 106 2 1.05 111 0.38 0.14 T 43 1.00 43 0.85 51 .' R 13 1.00 13 0.85 15 3 L 48 1.00 48 0.90 53 L 53 1 1.00 53 1.00 0.00 T 965 1.00 965 0.90 1072 TR 1118 2 1.05 1174 0.00 0.04 R 51 1.00 51 0.90 46+ B L 44 1.00 44 0.96 46 L 46 1 1.00 46 1.00 0.00 T 2034 1.00 2034 0.96 2119 TR 2143 2 1.05 2250 0.00'0.01 R 43 1.00 43 0.96 24+ r -')R volume not included SAT"uZt ATION FLOW ADJ-GSTMENT WORKSHEET s Ideal Lane Heavy Bus Area Right Left Adj. Lane Sat. N Width Veh Grade Pkg. -Block Type Turn Turn Sat. .pp Group Flow Lanes f f f f f f f Flow --- ----- ---- --- w P=V g p bb a RT LT vphg ,B LTR 1900 2 ----- 1.000 ---- 1.00 ----- 1.000 ---- ---- 1.00 1.00 ---- .900 ---- .935 ---- .898 ---- 2872 TB LTR 1900 2 0.900 1.00 1.000 .900 1.00 .900 .975 .786 2123 Z 1900 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 .076 130 TR 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 .900 1.00 .900 .993 1.00 2995 3r 1900 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 .097 166 t 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 .900 1.00 .900 .998 1.00 3010 �� ! S6 :IG/Cinema V1.0 ORGANIZATION: B & A PA_RTN-ERS, INC. ;E 15TH RD O BRICKELL AVr, PEDS SE 15TH RL / :CKELL AVE Page-4 WORKSHEET FOR PERMITTED LEFT TURNS OPPOSED BY A MULTI -LANE APPROACH EB WE NB SB Cycle Length C, (sec) 115 115 115 115 Actual Green, G 7.0 7.0 98.0 98.0 Effective Green, g (sec) 10.0 10.0 101.0 101.0 Opposing Effective Green, go 10.0 10.0 101.0 101.0 Number of Lanes, N 2 2 1 1 Opposing Lanes, No 2 2 2 2 Adjusted Left -Turn Flow Rate, vLT 18 40 53 46 Proportion of LT, PLT 0.16 0.38 1.00 1.00 Opposing Flow Rate, vo (vph) 111 115 2250 1174 Lost Time Per Phase, tL 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Left Turns per Cycle, LTC=vLT*C/3600 0.57 1.28 1.69 1.47 Opp Flow (/Ln/Cycle), volc=vo*C/(3600*No) 1.77 1.84 35.94 18.75 Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 gf=G**(-0.860*LTC**.629)-tL, gf<=c 1.87n 0.45-u 0.00 0.00 Opp. Queue Ratio, taro=l-Rpo*(go/C) 0.91 0.91 0.12 0.12 gq 1.34 1.46 21.33 4.77 gu=g-gq (if gq<=gf then gu=g-gf) 8.13 8.54 79.67 96.23 fs=(875-.625*vo)/1000, fs>=0 0.81 0.80 0.00 0.14 PL=PLT[1+{ (N-1) *g/ (fs*gu+4.5) }] 0.31 0.71 1.00 1.00 EL1 1.S2 1.54 10.40 " 9.85 fmin=2* (1+PL) /g 0.26 0.34 0.04 0.04 fm= [gf/g] + [gu/g] [1/ (I+PL (EL1-1) } ] 0.89 0 . 66 0.08 0.10 '" = [fm + .91 * (N-1) ] / N 0.90 0.79 0.08 0.10 :.k%.,- . n gf for Multi -Lane 98- 786 IG/Cinema V1. 0 -- ORGA-NI ZATION : B & A PART! = RS , INC. E 15TH RD 9i BRICKELL AVE, PEDS SE 15TH RD /': _CKELL AVE Page-5 CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEET v s v/s g/C c------X-====__ Lane Adj Flow Adj Sat Flow Green Capacity v/c App. Group (vph) (vphg) Ratio Ratio (vph) Ratio ---- ----- ----- ------ ----- ------------------------------- EB LTR" 115 2872 0.04 0.09 250 0.46 WB * LTR 111 2123 0.05 0.09 185 0.60 NB L 53 130 0.41 0.88 -i14 0.46 TR 1174 2995 0.39 0.88 2630 0.45 SB L 46 166 0.28 0.88 146 0.32 * TR 2250 3010 0.75 0.86 2644 0.85 * Critical Lane Groua Sum(v/s)crit = 0.80 Xc = 0.83 Cycle Length, C = 115 Sec Lost Time Per Cycle, L = 4.0 Sec LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKS!EET ----- Delay 1 ------ --- Delay 2 --- -Ln Grp - -- App -- X g/C di Dr c m d2 Delay Delay Lane v/c Green (sec Adj. Can Calib (sec (sec (sec App --- Grp. Ratio Ratio /veh) Fact (vph) Param /veh) /veh) LOS /veh) LOS EB ---- LTR ----- 0.46 ----- 0.09 ----- 37.9 ---- 0.85 ----- 250 ----- 16.0 ----- 1.0 ----- --- 33.2 D ----- 33.2 --- D WE LTR 0.60 0.09 38.4 0.85 185 16.0 3.8 36.4 D 36.4 D NB L 0.46 0.88 1.1 1.00 114 16.0 2.2 3.3 A 1.2 A TR 0.45 0'.88 1.1 1.00 2630 16.0 0.1 1.1 A SE L 0.32 0.88 0.9 1.00 146 16.0 0.4 1.3 A 4.5 A TR 0.85 0.88 2.6 1.00 2644 16.0 2.1 4.6 A Intersection Cycle = 115 Sec 5.3 B �- 8 Appendix 3: Intersection of Brickell Avenue and SE 13' Street - SIG/CINEMA Analysis for 1997 Existing Conditions. 98- 786 HCtt Su .%mart' Results for. -Case: EXT13-S i SE 13rri SI /BB LLKLLL HVt ' SE 13TH STREET 2 1 (ELL AQE%E 1997 Exstng Pfi A Uo 1 Version 1.6 - Lane Grp'- - App i296 Delay L Delay L I Lane X (sec/ 0 (sec/ 0 4 24I � I 4 i I Grp v/s v/c veh) S veh) S t I I 32 EB L 6.85 0.38 32.9 D 36.2 D I I I I '`- 216 LT *8.10 0.66 38.8 D ►�tlt ICI I I I � 83 R 6.840..25 22.5 D _____-- --- __ - - -- W3 L 6.85 0.32 32.4 D - F - -------- T *6.19 1.15 - - t ItIt--------- R 8.82 O.iB 31.8 D 1B7 -' t t�t 138 I KB L *1.76 2.88 - - - F 64 = t t t «t TR 0.14 8.Z3 6.1 B t t t i 236 21 t t 453 SB L 8.85 0.67 5.4 B 8.7 B 1 �(�, 2 3 , . J - T 6.40 0.64 9.2 B R 8.14 0.22 6.8 B 69 ��� 4 1 1� 4 11 16 4 1 Int. 2.85 2.16 - F t 98- 786 IG/Cinema V1.0 ORGANIZATION: B & A PA ERS, INC. �E 13TH STREET @ BRICKELL AVENUE SE 13TH ST /BRICKELL AVE Page-1 ENTIFYING INFORMATION EAST APPROACH: SE 13TH ST NORTH APPROACH: BRICKELL AVE WEST APPROACH: SE 12TH TERR SOUTH APPROACH: BRICKELL AVE ANALYST: Khaled Al-Sahili ANALYSIS DATE: 7/29/97 -ANALYSIS PERIOD: PM PEAK BACKGROUND CASE: EXT13_ST INTERSECTION GEOMETRY LANE LEFT TURN RIGHT TURN 1IDPROACH -OUTBOUND LENGTH ----POCKET--- ----POCKET--- APP, LANES LANES (FEET) LANES ------ ----- (FEET) LANES (FEET) ------ ----- ------ ---- EB ----- 3 ----- 2 600 1 100 0 0 WB 3 2 600 1 100 0 0 N'B 3 2 600 1 100 0 0 SB 4 2 600 1 100 1 100 MOVEMENTS SERVICED BY LANE AND LANE WIDTHS(FEET) LANE 1 LANE 2 LANE 3 LANE e LANE 5 LANE, 6 APP_ MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. ---------- WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH -------------------- ---- ES ---------- L 12.0 ---------- LT 12.0 ---------- R 12.0 3 L 12.0 T 12.0 R 12.0 .13 L 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 -;B L 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 R 12.0 L - EXCLUSIVE LEFT TURN T - EXCLUSIVE THROUGH LT - LEFT TURN / THROUGH TR• - THROUGH / RIGHT TURN LR - LEFT TURN / RIGHT TURN R - EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TURN LTR - LEFT MTRN / THROUGH / RIGHT TURN TRAFFIC VOLUMES CURRENT TRAFFIC VOLUMES (VPH) GROWTH FACTORS APP. ----------------------------- LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR -------------- LEFT THRU RIGHT ----- ---- EB ---- 107 ---- 138 ----- 64 ---- 10 ---- 1.00 ---- 1.00 1.00 WE 83 316 32 10 1.010 1.00 1.00 NB 236 453 21 10 1.00 1.00 1.00 SB 24 1296 284 100 1.00 1.00 1.00 MOVEMENT VOLUMES (VPH) ---------------------- APP. LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR B 107 138 64 10 qB 83 316 32 10 236 453 21 10 J SB 24 1290' 284 100 PEAK HOUR FACTORS ----------------- LEFT THRU RIGHT 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 98! 0 86 ;IG/Cinema V1.0 ORGANIZATION: B & A PAR'r'*r'RS, INC. 3E 13TH STREET O 3RICKELL :NL'E SE 13T14 ST / ICKELL AVE Page-2 -1IGNAL SETTINGS - OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS CONTROL TYPE : SEMI -ACTUATED PHASING: MOVEMENTS SERVICED PPP. 1 2 3 4 56 7 8 EB LTP WB LTP NB LTP SB LTP L=Left Turn, T=Through; R=Right, no Peds; P=Ri-ght w Ped conflict TIMING BY PHASE (SECONDS) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Green 69.0 15.0 16.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 All Red 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 DURATION OF PEDESTRIAN ONLY PHASE (SECS) 0 CYCLE LENGTH (SECS) 115 . 0 LOST TIME PER PHASE (SECS) 2.0 TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY CONDITIONS ------------------------------------- AREA TYPE - CBD L HEAVY VEHICLES 0 PLATOON ARRIVAL TYPE 3 EAST WEST NORTH SOUTH T R L T R L T R L T R --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 .3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 C014FLICTING PEDESTRIANS'/HOUR PERCENT GRADE CURB PARKING NUMBER OF PARKING MANEUVERS/HOUR NUMBER OF BUSES STOPPING/HOUR PEDESTRIAN BUTTON MINIMUM GREEN TIME FOR PEDESTRIANS EAST WEST NORTH SOUTH ---- 50 ---- 50 ----- 50 ----- 50 0 0 0 0 N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N 23.0 23.0 17.0 17.0 9 8 - 78(36 IG/Cinema V1.0 ORGANIZATION: B & A PAR' 7RS, INC. E 13TH STREET © BRICK=LL i. "NuE- SE 13TH ST /!�..ICKELL AVE Page-3 VOLUME ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET v v D 9 Peak Lane U v Current Mvt Mvt Group Lane Adj. Vol Growth Vol Flow Lane Flow. N Util Flow Proportion ,V-D Mvt (vph) Factor ------ (vph) PHF (vph) Grp . (vph) Lns ----- --- ----- ---- ----- --- Fact ---- (vph) ----- LT RT --- �B --- L ----- 107 1.00 107 0.97 110 L 99 1 1.00 99 ---- 1.00 ---- 0.00 T 138 1.00 138 0.97 142 LT 153 1 1.00 153 0.07 0.00 R 64 1.00 64 0.97 56+ R 56 1 1.00 56 0.00 1.00 dB L 83 1.100 83 0.97 86 L 86 1. 1.00 86 1.00 0.00 T 316 1.00 316 0.97 326 T 326 1 1.00 326 0.00 0.00 R 32 1.00 32 0.97 23+ R 23 1 1.00 23 0.00 1.00 VB L 236 1.00 236 0.96 246 L 246 1 1.00 246 1.00 0.00 T 453 1.00 453 0.90' 472 TR 484 2 1.05 508 0.00 0.02 R 21 1.00 21 0.96 12+ SB L 24 1.00 24 0.96 25 L 25 1 1.00 25 1.00 0.00 T 1296 1.00 1296 0.96 1350 T 1350 2 1.05 1417 0.00'0.00 R 284 1.00 284 0.96 192+ R 192 1 1.00 192 0.00 1.00 T R volume not included SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET --------------------------------------------------------------- s Ideal Lane Heavy Bus Area Right Left Adj. Lane Sat. N Width Veh Grade Pkg. Block Type Turn Turn Sat. ADD Group Flow Lanes f f f f f f f Flow --- w HV g p bb a RT LT vphg EB ----- L ---- 1900 --- 1 ----- ---- ----- 1.000 1.00 1.000 ---- ---- 1.00 1.00 ----- .900 ---- 1.00 ---- .950 ---- 1624 LT 1900 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 .996 1703 R 1900 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 .826 1.00 1412 WB L 1900 1 T 1900 1 R 1900 1 NB L 1900 1 TR 1900 2 `- �J 1900 1 T 1900 2 R 1900 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 .950 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 .826 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.000 .980 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.000 .980 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.000 1.00' 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 .078 .900 .996 1.00 1624 1710 1412 133 3338 .900 1.00 .305 522 .900 1.00 1.00 3352 .900 .826 1.00 1412 98- 786 IG/Cinema Vl . 0 ORGAN:Z..AT.-LON : B & A PART" -RS , INC.. S 13TH STREET @ BRICKELL A .;UE SE 13TH ST /B._CKELL AVE Page-4 ")RKSHEET FOR PERMITTED LEFT TURNS OPPOSED BY A MULTI -LANE APPROACH EB WB NB SE Cycle Length C, (sec) 115 115 Actual Green, G 69.0 69.0 Effective Green, g (sec) 72.0 72.0 Opposing Effective Green, go 72.0 72.0 Number of Lanes, N 1 1 Opposing Lanes, No 2 2 Adjusted Left -Turn Flow Rate, vLT 246 25 Proportion of LT, PLT 1.00 1.00 Opposing Flow Rate, vo (vph) 1417 508 Lost Time Per Phase, tL 2.0 2.0 Left Turns per -Cycle, LTC=vLT*C/3600 7.86 0.80 Opp Flow (/Ln/Cycle), volc=vo*C/(3600*No) 22.63 8.11 Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo 1.00 1.00 gf=G**(-0.860*LTC**.629)-tL, gf<=g 0.00 0.00 Opp. Queue Ratio, qro=1-Rpo*(go/C) 0.37 0.37 gq 25.91 5.06 'gu=g-gq (if gq<=gf then gu=g-gf) 46.09 66.94 fs=(875-.625*vo)/1000, fs>=0 0.00 0.56 PL=PLT [1+((N-1) *g/ (fs*gu+4. 5) } ] 1. 00 • • 1. 00 '3.05 EL1 8.20 fmin=2*(1+PL)/g 0.06 0.06 rm=[gf/g]+[gu/g] [1/(1+PL(EL1-1) }] 0.08 0.31 _ [fm + .91 * (N-1) ] / N 0.08 0.31 98- '786 G/Cinema V1.0 ORGANIZATION: B & A .PART' ZS, INC. 13T-H STREET Q BRICKELL SE 13TH ST /Bi,-CKELL AVE Page-5 ************************************************************************** CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEET v s v/s g/C c X Lane Adj Flow Adj Sat Flow Green Capacity v/c App. Group (vph) ----- (vphg) ------ Ratio ----- Ratio - - - -- (vph) ------------ Ratio -------------- ---- ----- EF L 99 1624 0.06 0.16 254 0.39 * LT 153 1703 0.09 0.16 267 0.57 R 56 1412 0.04 0.16, 221 0.25 WB L 86 1624 0.05 0.17 268 0.32 * T 326 1710 0.19 0.17 283 1.15 R 23 1412 0.02 0.17 233 0.10 NB * L 246 133 1.85 0.63 83 2.96 TR 508 3338 0.15 0.63 2090 0.24 SB L 25 522 0.05 0.63 327 0.08 T 1417 3352 0.42 0.63 2099 0.68 R 192 1412 0.14 0.63 884 0.22 * Critical Lane Group Sum (v/s) Grit = 2.13 Xc = 2.25 'ycle Length, C = 115 Sec Lost Time Per Cycle, L = 6.0 Sec LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEET ----- Delay 1 ------ --- Delay 2 --- -Ln Grp - -- App -- X g/C di DF c m d2 Delay Delay Lane v/c Green (sec Adj. Cap Calib (sec (sec (sec Amp --- Grp. ---- Ratio ----- Ratio ----- /veh) ----- Fact ---- (vph) Param ----- /veh) ----- /veh) LOS /veh) ----- --- ----- LOS --- EB L 0.39 0.16 33.1 1.00 ----- 254 16.0 0.5 33.6 D 34.8 D LT 0.57 0.16 34.2 1.00 267 16.0 2.2 36.3 D R 0.25 0.16 32.4 1.00 221 16.0 0.1 32.5 D WB L 0.32 0.17 32.2 1.00 268 16.0 0.2 32.4 D - F T 1.15 0.17 - - 283 16.0 - - - R 0.10 0.17 31.0 1.00 233 16.0 0.0 31.0 D NB L 2.96 0.63 - - 83 16.0 - - - - F TR 0.24 0.63 7.2 0.85 2090 16.0 0.0 6.1 B SB L 0.08 0.63 6.4 0.85 327 16.0 0.0 5.5 B 9.1 B T 0.68 0.63 10.6 0.85 2099 16.0 0.6 9.6 B R 0.22 0.63 7.1 0.85 884 16.0 0.0 6.0 B Intersection Delay invalid, X>1/PHF or X>1.2 Cycle = 115 Sec - F 98- 786 Appendix 4: FDOT ART -TAB Analysis for 1997 Existing Conditions. 98- 786 f-kRl-1I1L:) VGIJIVII f-.V Arterial Level of Service Volume Tables Based on Chapter 11 of the 1994 Highway Capacity Manual Florida Department of Transporta, August 1995 DESCRIPTION ROAD NAME:Brickell Avenue From: SE 13 Street To: SE 15 Road 3EAK »»»»» PEAK DIRECTION: SB Study Time Period:PM PEAK Analysis Date: July 29, 1997 Number of Lanes:4 LD AADT: 23,000 User Notes:1997 Existing Conditions Fife: 97EXSTSB.WK1 kFFIC CHARACTERISTICS —Range— K FACTOR: 0.087 (0.06 - 0.20) D FACTOR: 0,661 (0.50 - 1.00) PHF: 0.960 (0.70 -1.00) ADJ. SATURATION FLOW RATE: 1,350 (1400 - 2000) S6 TURNS FROM EXCLUSIVE LANES: 5 (0 - 100) 1ADWAY CHARACTERISTICS URBAN, TRANSITIONING, OR RURAL AREA TYPE: U (U, T, or R) ARTERIAL CLASS: 2 (1. 2, or 3) FREE FLOW SPEED (mph): 35 (40.35.30,25) TOTAL LENGTH OF ARTERIAL (mi): 027 MEDIANS (YIN): y GNAIIZATION CHARACTERISTICS NO. SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS: 1 ARRIVAL TYPE, PEAK DIRECTION: 3 (1,2,3,4,5 or 6) TYPE SIGNAL SYSTEM: S (P,'S. or A) (P--Predmed, S=Semiactuoted, A=Actuated) SYSTEM CYCLE LENGTH (sec): 115 (60 -180) WEIGHTED THRU MOVEMENT o/C: 0.30 (0.20 - 0.80) (includes ve 7�s in exclusive turn lanes) 370370.4 JaL � ions osr milr Le A Service LANES A B C D E 1 NIA .190 1.400 1510. 1,560 2 NIA '.680 2.890 3,060 3.120 3 NIA B10 4.410 4,920 4.670 4 NIA .:.170 5,960 6,170 6.230 P K HOUR �, . LIME (BOTH DIRECTIONS) - . (Includes ve -es in exclusive turn lanes) 3 7037N InL C-lions oer mile Le c: Service LANzs A C D E 2 NIA ...790 2.120 2.280 2,360 4 NIA :,750 4,370 4,630 4,710 6 N/A -.760 6,680 6.930 7.070 B NIA '. E20 9,020 9,340 9,430 ,JAL DAILY 7RAPFIC (AZT) AVERAGE ! (Includes •n+cles in exclusive tun lanes) 3 703704 )OL. --tions per mile Le. of Service LANES A C D E 2 WA I= 24,400 26 200 27.100 4 NIA '.100 50,300 53,200 54,200 6 NIA .300 76,700 80.300 81.300 8 NIA -.500 103,600 IC7,400 Ica .400 is not achievable means the level of sery ik Hour Peak Directior -rough/Right vic Ratio for Full Hour -.I of Service LANES A C D E 1 WA C.76 0.90 0.97 1.00 2 NIA C.80 0.93 0.98 1.00 3 NIA ^.52 0.94 0.99 1.00 98786 ART -TAB Version 2.0 Arterial Level of Service Volume Tables Based on Chapter 11 of the 1994 Highway Capacity Manual Update Florida Department of Transportation Aucust 1995 DESCRIPTION ROAD NAME: Brickell Avenue Front SE 15 Road To:SE 13 Street BEAK > »»»» PEAK DIRECTION:NS Study Time Period: PM PEAK Analysis Date: July 29. 1997 Number of Laness:4 LD - AADT: 23,000 User Notes:1997 Existing Conditions File: 9TEXSTNB.YJK1 CHARACTERISTICS q -Rang e- IBI K FACTOR: 0.087 (0.06 - 0-20) D FACTOR: 0.661 (0.50 - 1.00) PHF: 0.960 (0.70 - 1.00) ADJ. SATURATION FLOW RATE: 1,850 (14W - 2000) 6 TURNS FROM EXCLUSIVE LANES: 33 (0 - 100) Y CHARACTERJSTICS URBAN, TRANSITIONING, OR RURAL AREA TYPE: U (U. T. or R) ARTERIAL CLASS: 2 (1, 2. or 3) FREE FLOW SPEED (mph): 35 (40 35,30,25) TOTAL LENGTH OF ARTERIAL (m): 0.27 NAEDL4NS (YIN): y LEFT TURN BAYS (YIN): v IGNALIZATION CHARACTERISTICS NO. SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS: 1 ARRIVAL TYPE, PEAK DIRECTION: 3 (1,2.3,4,5 or 6) TYPE SIGNAL SYSTEM: S (P. S. or A) (P=Prefirned, S=Semiaefuefed, A=Actuated) SYSTEM CYCLE LENGTH (sec): 115 (60 - 180) 1NFIr:uT;:n TWRtl MnVFMFNT e/C- 0_97 to 2a - a aa1 PEAK HOUR977 5MC-TiON VOLUMrz (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) 3 7037Q4 Intersections oer mil, Level of Service t: XES A B C D E 1 NIA 250 1.370 1.560 1.710 2 WA Soo 2.900 3.240 3.420 3 NIA 750 4.460 4.940 5.140 4 WA 1,000 5,980 6.620 - 6,8W PEAK HOUR VOLUME (BOTH NrEc ONS) (Includes vehicles in exclusive tum lanes) 3 703704 Intersections per mile Level of Service 1.ANFs A B C D E 2 NIA 3W 2.070 2,3W 2.590 4 N/A 760 4.380 4,9W 5.180 6 N/A 1,140 6,740 7.480 7,770 8 N/A 1,520 9,0W 10,010 10.360 AVERAGE ANNUAL DAILY MPFIC (AA T) (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) 3 7037Q4 Irrirrsections per rrule' Level of Service LANts A B C D E 2 NIA 4.300 23,800 27.200 29.700 4 WA 8,700 50.400 56.400 59,SW 6 NIA 13.100 77,5W 85.900 89,300 8 WA 17.400 104,000 115.100 119.100 /A means the level of service is not achievable eak Hour Peak Direction Through/Pight vie Ratio for Full Hour Level of Service tarts A B C D E 1 WA 0.15 0.80 091 1.00 2 WA OAS 0.85 0.95 T.00 3 WA 0.15 0.87 0.96 1.00 4 N/A 0.15 0.87 0.97 1.00 98- 786 Appendix 5: Intersection of Brickell Avenue and SE 15`h Road - SIG/CINEMA and HCM Analysis for Year 2000 Traffic Conditions. 98- 786 HCM Summary Results for Case: BGCP15RD SE 15TH a /BRICIML AVE SE 15TH RD @ BRICICELL AVE, NO PEDS 2000 BG+Comn+Pro.i. Opt. Version 1.0 - Lane Grp - - App - I I Delay L Delay L 2171 I I I Lane X (sec/ 0 (sec/ 0 47I I i Grp v/s v/c veh) S veh) S_ 4 I I EB LTR 0.05 0.54 34.4 D 34.4 D I I 14 46 I I t 36 --------- --------- WB LTR *8.OG 0.67 39.1 D 39.1D __ ____-____ i 1 1 23 4G I I ME L 0.47 0.54 5.3 B 1.4 A 48 I I TR 0.42 0.48 1.2 A 51 54 I I I I 1034 SB L 0.31 0.36 1.6 A 7.1 B 1 Jli. 2 + r_ TR *8.86 0.91 7.2 B {IN -" 98 1 7 4 1 Int. 8.BG 0.89 7.1 B 98- 786 SIG/Cinema V1.0 ORGANIZATION: B & A PARTNERS, INC. -F 15TH RD @ BRICKELL AVE, NO PEDS SE 15TH RD /BRICKELL AVE Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION EAST APPROACH: SE 15TH RD NORTH APPROACH: BRICKELL AVE WEST APPROACH: SE 15TH RD SOUTH APPROACH: BRICKELL AVE ANALYST: J. AHLSTEDT ANALYSIS DATE: 5/7/98 ANALYSIS PERIOD: 2000 BG+Comm+Prof. Opt. CASE: BGCPISRD INTERSECTION GEOMETRY LANE LEFT TURN RIGHT TURN APPROACH OUTBOUND LENGTH ---- POCKET=-- ----POCKET--- APP. LANES LANES (FEET) LANES (FEET) LANES (FEET) ------ ----- ------ ---- EB ----- 2 ----- 2 ------ ----- 600 0 0 0 0 WB 2 2 400 0 0 0 0 NB 3 2 600 1 100 0 0 SB 3 2 600 1 100 0 0 MOVEMENTS SERVICED BY LANE AND LANE WIDTHS(FEET) LANE 1 LANE 2 LANE 3 LANE 4 LANE 5 LANE 6 APP. MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH ---------- MOV. ---------- WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH -------------------- ---- EB ---------- LT 12.0 ---------- TR 12.0 WB LT 9.0 TR 9.0 NB L 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 SB L 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 L - EXCLUSIVE LEFT TURN T - EXCLUSIVE THROUGH LT - LEFT TURN / THROUGH TR - THROUGH / RIGHT TURN LR - LEFT TURN / RIGHT TURN R - EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TURN LTR - LEFT TURN f THROUGH / RIGHT TURN TRAFFIC VOLUMES CURRENT TRAFFIC VOLUMES (VPH) GROWTH FACTORS APP. ----------------------------- LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR -------------- LEFT THRU RIGHT ---- EB ---- 23 ---- ----- 46 ---- 48 10 ---- 1.00 1.00 1.00 WB 36 46 14 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 NB 51 1034 54 10 1.00 1.00 1.00 SB 47 2171 57 20 1.00 1.00 1.00 MOVEMENT VOLUMES (VPH) ---------------------- APP. LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR EB 23 46 48 �0 WB 36 46 14 0 NB 51 1034 54 10 SB 47 2171 57 20 PEAK HOUR FACTORS LEFT - THRU RIGHT 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.96 0.96 0.96 98- 786 SIG/Cinema V1.0 ORGANIZATION: B & A PAx.INERS, INC. SE 15TH RD @ BRICKELL AVE, NO PEDS SE 15TH RD /BRICKELL AVE Page-2 SIGNAL SETTINGS - OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS ----------- CONTROL TYPE : SEMI -ACTUATED PHASING: MOVEMENTS SERVICED APP. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB LTR WB LTR NB LTR SB LTR L=Left Turn; T=Through; R=Right, no Peds; P=Right w Ped conflict TIMING BY PHASE (SECONDS) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Green 98.0 7.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0'.0 All Red 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 DURATION OF PEDESTRIAN ONLY PHASE (SECS) 0 CYCLE LENGTH (SECS) 115.0 LOST TIME PER PHASE (SECS) 2.0 TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY CONDITIONS AREA TYPE - CBD EAST WEST NORTH SOUTH ---- L T R ---- L T R ----- L T R ----- L T R --- --- --- o HEAVY VEHICLES 0' 0 0 --- --- 0 0 --- 0 --- --- 0 --- 2 0 --- --- --- 0 2 0 PLATOON ARRIVAL TYPE 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 EAST WEST NORTH SOUTH CONFLICT_NG PEDESTRIANS/HOUR 50 50 50 50 PERCENT GRADE 0 0 0 0 CURB PARKING N Y Y Y NUMBER OF PARKING MANEUVERS/HOUR 0 20 20 20 NUMBER OF BUSES STOPPING/HOUR 0 0 0 0 PEDESTRIAN BUTTON N N N N MINT_MUM GREEN TIME FOR PEDESTRIANS 20.0 20.0 15.9 15.9 98- 786 SIG/Cinema V1.0 ORGANIZATION: B & A PARTNERS, INC. SE 15TH RD @ BRICKELL AVE, NO PEDS SE 15TH RD /BRICKELL AVE Page-3 VOLUME ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET v v P g Peak Lane U v Current Mvt Mvt Group Lane Adj. Vol Growth Vol Flow Lane Flow N Util Flow Proportion App --- Mvt --- (vph) Factor ----- ------ (vph) ----- PHF --- (vph) ----- Grp. ---- (vph) Lns ----- Fact .(vph) LT RT EB L 23 1.00 23 0.85 27 LTR --- 125 2 ---- 1.05 ----- 131 ---- 0.22 ---- 0.35 T 46 1.00 46 0.85 54 R 48 1.00 48 0.85 44+ WB L 36 1.00 36 0.85 42 LTR 112, 2 1.05 118 0.38 0.14 T 46 1.00 46 0.85 54 R 14 1.00 14 0.85 16 NB L 51 1.00 51 0.90 57 L 57 1 1.00 57 1.00 0.00 T 1034 1.00 1034 0.90 1149 TR 1198 2 1.05 1258 0.00 0.04 R 54 1.00 54 0.90 49+ SB L 47 1.00 47 0.96 49 L 49 1 1.00 49 1.00 0.00 T 2171 1.00 2171 0.96 2261 TR 2299 2 1.05 2414 0.00 0.02 R 57 1.00 57 0.96 38+ RTOR volume not included SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET s Ideal Lane Heavy Bus Area Right Left Adj. Lane Sat. N Width Veh Grade Pkg. Block Type Turn Turn Sat. App Group Flow Lanes f f f f f f f f Flow --- ----- ---- --- w HV g p bb a RT LT vphg EB LTR 1900 2 ----- 1.000 ---- 1.00 ----- ---- ---- 1.000 1.60 1.00 ---- .900 ---- •.947 ---- .858 ---- 2779 WB LTR 1900 2 0.900 1.00 1.000 .900 1.00 .900 .979 .752 2039 NB L 1900 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 .071 121 TR 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 .900 1.00 .900 .994 1.00 2998 3 L 1900 1 TR 1900 2 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.010 1.00 .900 1.00 .091 1.000 .980 1.000 .900 1.00 .900 .998 1.00 156 3010 98- 766 SIG/Cinema V1.0 ORGANIZATION: B & A Pk .NERS, INC. SE 15TH RD @ BRICKELL AVE, NO PEDS SE 15TH RD /BRICKELL AVE Page-4 WORKSHEET FOR PERMITTED LEFT TURNS OPPOSED BY A MULTI -LANE APPROACH EB WB NB------SB-- Cycle Length C, (sec) 115 115 115 115 Actual Green, G 7.0 7.0 98.0 98.0 Effective Green, g (sec) 10.0 10.0 .101.0 101.0 Opposing Effective Green, go 10.0 10.0 101.0 101.0 Number of Lanes, N 2 2 1 1 Opposing Lanes, No 2 2 2 2 Adjusted Left -Turn Flow Rate, vLT 27 42 57 49 Proportion of LT, PLT 0.22 0.38 1.00 1.00 Opposing Flow Rate, vo (vph) 118 131 2414 1258 Lost Time Per Phase, tL 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Left Turns per Cycle, LTC=vLT*C/3600 0.86 1.34 1.82 1.57 Opp Flow (/Ln/Cycle), volc=vo*C/(3600*No) 1.88 2.09 38.56 20.09 Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 gf=G**(-0.860*LTC**.629)-tL, gf<=g 1.17# 0.36# 0.00 0.00 Opp. Queue Ratio, qro=1-Rpo*(go/C) 0.91 0.91 0.12 0.12 gq 1.56 1.97 26.50 5.52 gu=g-gq (if gq<=gf then gu=g-gf) 8.44 8.03 74.50 95.48 fs=(875-.625*vo)/1000, fs>=0 0.80 0.79 0.00 •• 0.09 PL=PLT [1+{ (N-1) *g/ (fs*gu+4 . 5)) ] 0.41 0.72 1.00 1.00 EL1 1.55 1.61 10.40 10.40 fmin=2*(l+PL)/g 0.28 0.34 0.04 0.04 `m= [gf/g] + [gu/g] [1/ (1+PL (EL1-1)) ] 0.81 0.59 0.07 0.09 fLT = [fm + .91 * (N-1)] / N 0.86 0.75 0.07 0.09 # gf for Multi -Lane f�S -- 7 � SIG/Cinema V1.0 ORGANIZATION: B & A PArcTNERS, INC. SE 15TH RD Q BRICKELL AVE, NO PEDS SE 15TH RD /BRICKELL AVE Page-5 CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEET v s v/s g/C c Lane Adj Flow Adj Sat Flow Green Capacity v/c App. Group (vph) ---- ----- ----- (vphg) ------ Ratio ----- Ratio ----- (vph) Ratio EB LTR 131 2779 0.05 0.09 ------------ 242 -------------- 0.54 WB * LTR 118 2039 0.06 0.09 177 0.67 NB L 57 121 0.47 0.88 106 0.54 TR 1258 2998 0.42 0.88 2633 0.48 SB L 49 156 0.31 0.88 137 0.36 * TR 2414 3010 0.80 0.88 2644 0.91 * Critical Lane Group Sum(v/s)crit = 0.86 Xc = 0.89 _ Cycle Length, C = 115 Sec Lost Time Per Cycle, L = 4.0 Sec LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEET ----- Delay 1 ------ --- Delay 2 --- -Ln Grp - -- App -- X g/C di DF c m d2 Delay Delay Lane v/c Green (sec Adj. Cap Calib (sec (sec (sec App --- Grp. ---- Ratio Ratio /veh) Fact (vph) Param /veh) /veh) LOS /veh) LOS EB LTR ----- 0.54 ------ 0.09 ----- 38.2.0.85 ---- ----- 242 ----- 16.0 ----- 1.9 ----- --- 34.4 D ----- --- 34.4 D WB LTR 0.67 0.09 38.7 0.85 177 16.0 6.2 39.1 D 39.1 D NB L 0.54 0.88 1.2 1.00 106 16.0 4.0 5.3 B 1.4 A TR 0.48 0.88 1.1 1.00 2633 16.0 0.1 1.2 A SB L 0.36 0.88 TR 0.91 0.88 0.9. 1_00 3.3 1.00 137 16.0 0.7 2644 16.0 4.0 Cycle = 115 Sec 1.6 A 7.1 B 7.2 B Intersection 7.1 B 98- 786 Appendix 6: Intersection of Brickell Avenue and SE 13t' Street - SIG/CINEMA and HCM Analysis for Year 2000 Traffic Conditions. 98- '786 HCM Summary Resu for Case: BCP-13ST SE 13Th /BRICKELL AVE SE 13TH STREET 9 BRICHELL AVENUE 2000 BG + Con + Project Version 1.0 - Lane Grp - - App - 1525 Delay L Delay L � 3 1 2 I Lane X (sec/ 0 (sec/ 0 I Grp v!s v/c veh) S veh) S I I I I 34 EB L 0.07 0.46 34.5 D 37.6 D I I t I �-- 335 LT 0.09 0.56 36.1 D r' 105 R *8.110.78 41.3 E -------- -_--____-- WB L 0.07 0.40 33.2 D T *8.20 1.22 - - R 0.01 0.06 30.8 D MB L *4.17 6.70 - - TR 0.24 0.38 6.9 B 114 146 -' F 201 I t�l t tt I I I I I I I 424 43 I I 698 SE L 0.11 0.17 5.9 B 11.2 B 1. i�i. 2 3 T 0.50 0.79 11.9 B R 0.13 0.21 6.0 B 69 tt 4 1 1� 4 1 16 4 1 Int. 4.48 4.73 - F M SIG/Cinema V1.0 ORGANIZATION: B & A PA__NERS, INC. SE 13TH STREET @ BRICKELL AVENUE SE 13TH ST /BRICKELL AVE Page-3 VOLUME ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET v v P g Peak Lane U v Current Mvt Mvt Group Lane Adj. Vol Growth Vol Flow Lane Flow N Util Flow Proportion App Mvt (vph) ----- Factor ------ (vph) ----- PHF --- (vph) ----- Grp. ---- (vph) Lns ----- --- Fact ---- (vph) ----- LT ---- RT ---- --- EB --- L 114 1.00 114 0.97 118 L 118 1 1.00 118 1.00 0.00 T 146 1.00 146 0.97 151 LT 151 1 1.00 151 0.00 0.00 R 201 1.00 201 0.97 130+ R 130 1 1.00 130 0.00 1.00 WE L 105 1.00 105 0.97 108 L 108' 1 1.00 108 1.00 0.00 T 335 1.00 335 0.97 345 T 345 1 1.00 345 0.00 0.00 R 34 1.00 34 0.97 4+ R 4 1 1.00 4 0.00 1.00 NB L 424 1.00 424 0.96 442 L 442 1 1.00 442 1.00 0.00 ' T 698 1.00 698 0.96 727 TR 751 2 1.05 789 0.00 0.03 R 43 1.00 43 0.96 24+ SB L 26 1.00 26 0.96 27 L 27 1 1.00 27 1.00 0.00 T 1525 1.00 1525 0.96 1589 T 1589 2 1.05 1668 0.00 0.00 R 301 1.00 301 0.96 147+ R 147 1 1.00 147 0.00 1.00 .TOR volume not included SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET s Ideal Lane Heavy Bus Area Right Left Adj. Lane Sat. N Width Veh Grade Pkg. Block Type Turn Turn Sat. App Group Flow Lanes f f f f f f f f Flow w HV g p bb a RT LT ---- vphg ---- --- EB ----- L ---- 1900 --- 1 ----- 1.000 ---- 1.00 ----- 1.000 ---- 1-00 ---- 1.00 ---- .900 ---- 1.00 .950 1624 LT 1900 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 1.00 1710 R 1900 1 1.000 .1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 '.826 1.00 1412 WB L 1900 1 1.000. 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 .950 1624 T 1900 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 1.00 1710 R 1900 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 .826 1.00 1412 NB Lper .074 127 Lpro 1900 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 .950 1624 TR 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 .994 1.00 3331 LpE.r .116 198 _- Lpro 1900 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 .950 1624 T 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 1.00 3352 3352 R 1900 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 _1.0 �1412 SIG/Cinema V1.0 ORGANIZATION: B & A PARTNERS, INC. -SE 13TH STREET @ BRICKELL AVENUE SE 13TH ST /BRICKELL AVE Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION EAST APPROACH: SE 13TH ST NORTH APPROACH: BRICKELL AVE WEST APPROACH: SE 12TH TERR SOUTH APPROACH: BRICKELL AVE ANALYST: J. AHLSTEDT ANALYSIS DATE: 5/8/98 ANALYSIS PERIOD: 2000 BG + Com + Project CASE: BCP_13ST INTERSECTION GEOMETRY LANE LEFT TURN RIGHT TURN APPROACH OUTBOUND LENGTH ----POCKET--- ----POCKET--- APP. LANES LANES (FEET) LANES (FEET) LANES (FEET) ---- ----- ----- EB 3 2 600 1 100 0 0 WB 3 2 600 1 100 0 0 NB 3 2 600 1 100 0 0 SB 4 2 600 1 100 1 100 MOVEMENTS SERVICED BY LANE AND LANE WIDTHS(FEET) LANE 1 LANE 2 LANE 3 LANE 4 LANE 5 LANE 6 APP. MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH ------------------------------------------------------ ---- EB L 12.0 LT 12.0 R 12.0 WB L 12.0 T 12.0 R 12.0 NB L 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 SB L 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 R 12.0 L - EXCLUSIVE LEFT TURN T - EXCLUSIVE THROUGH LT - LEFT TURN / THROUGH TR - THROUGH / RIGHT TURN LR - LEFT TURN / RIGHT TURN R - EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TURN LTR - LEFT TURN / THROUGH / RIGHT TURN TRAFFIC VOLUMES CURRENT TRAFFIC VOLUMES (VPH) GROWTH FACTORS APP. ----------------------------- LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR -------------- LEFT THRU RIGHT EB 114 146 201 50 1.00 1.00 1.00 WB 105 335 34 20 1.00 1.00 1.00 NB 424 698 43 20 1.00 1.00 1.00 SB 26 1525 301 120 1.00 1.00 1.00 MOVEMENT VOLUMES (VPH) ---------------------- APP. LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR EB 114 146 201 50 WE 105 335 34 20 NB 424 698 43 20 SB 26 1525 301 120 PEAK HOUR FACTORS ----------------- LEFT THRU RIGHT 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 98- 786 SIG/Cinema V1.0 ORGANIZATION: B & A PAt<rNERS, INC. SE 13TH STREET @ BRICKELL AVENUE SE 13TH ST /BRICKELL AVE Page-2 SIGNAL SETTINGS - OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS ----------- CONTROL TYPE : SEMI -ACTUATED PHASING: MOVEMENTS SERVICED APP. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB LTP WB LTP NB LTP SB LTP L=Left Turn; T=Through; R=Right, no Peds; P=Right w Ped conflict TIMING BY PHASE (SECONDS) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Green 69.0 15.0 16.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0-.0 All Red 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 DURATION OF PEDESTRIAN ONLY PHASE (SECS) 0 CYCLE LENGTH (SECS) 115.0 LOST TIME PER PHASE (SECS) 2.0 TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY CONDITIONS AREA TYPE - CBD EAST WEST NORTH SOUTH L -T R L T R L T R L T R --- --- --- HEAVY VEHICLES 0- 0 0 --- --- --- 0 0 0 --- - 0 2 0 0 2 0 PLATOON ARRIVAL TYPE 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 EAST WEST NORTH SOUTH CONFLICTING PEDESTRIANS/HOUR 50 50 50 50 PERCENT GRADE 0 0 0 0 N CURB PARKING N N N NUMBER OF PARKING MANEUVERS/HOUR 0 0 0 0 0 NUMBER OF BUSES STOPPING/HOUR 0 0 0 PEDESTRIAN BUTTON N N N N 17.0 MINIMUM GREEN TIME FOR PEDESTRIANS 23.0 23.0 17.0 98- "786 SIG/Cinema V1.0 ORGANIZATION: B & A PARTNERS, INC. SE 13TH STREET @ BRICKELL AVENUE SE 13TH ST /BRICKELL AVE Page-3 VOLUME ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET v v P g Peak Lane U v Current Mvt Mvt Group Lane Adj. Vol Growth Vol Flow Lane Flow N Util Flow Proportion App Mvt --- (vph) Factor ----- ------ (vph) ----- PHF --- (vph) ----- Grp. ---- (vph) Lns ----- --- Fact ---- (vph) ----- LT ---- RT ---- --- EB L 114 1.00 114 0.97 118 L 118 1 1.00 118 1.00 0.00 T 146 1.00 146 0.97 151 LT 151 1 1.00 151 0.00 0.00 R 201 1.00 201 0.97 155+ R 155 1 1.00 155 0.00 1.00 WE L 105 1.00 105 0.97 108 L 1081 1.00 108 1.00 0.00 T 335 1.00 335 0.97 345 T 345 1 1.00 345 0.00 0.00 R 34 1.00 34 0.97 14+ R 14 1 1.00 14 0.00 1.00 NB L 424 1.00 424 0.96 442 L 442 1 1.00 442 1.00 0.00 T 698 1.00 698 0.96 727 TR 751 2 1.05 789 0.00 0.03 R 43 1.00 43 0.96 24+ SB L 26 1.00 26 0.96 27 L 27 1 1.00 27 1.00 0.00 T 1525 1.00 1525 0.96 1589 T 1589 2 1.05 1668 0.00 0.00 R 301 1.00 301 0.96 189+ R 189 1 1.00 189 0.00 1.00 RTOR volume not included SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET s Ideal Lane Heavy Bus Area Right Left Adj. Lane Sat. N Width Veh Grade Pkg. Block Type Turn Turn Sat. App Group Flow Lanes f f f f f f f f Flow --- ----- ---- --- w ----- HV g p bb a RT ---- LT ---- vphg ---- EB L 1900 1 1.000 ---- 1.00 ----- 1.000 ---- ---- 1.00 1.00 ---- .900 1.00 .950 1624 LT 1900 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 1.00 1710 R 1900 1 1.000 -1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 -.826 1.00 1412 WB L 1900 1 1.000. 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 .950 T 1900 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 1.00 R 1900 1 1.0.00 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 .826 1.00 NB L 1900 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 .062 TR 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 .594 1.00 ;B L 2,900 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 .149 T 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 1.00 R 1900 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 .826 1.00 1624 1710 1412 106 3331 255 3352 1412 98- 786 SIG/Cinema V1.0 ORGANIZATION: B & A PARTNERS, INC. SE 13TH STREET @ BRICKELL AVENUE SE 13TH ST /BRICKELL AVE Page-4 WORKSHEET FOR PERMITTED LEFT TURNS OPPOSED BY A MULTI -LANE APPROACH EB WB NB - SB-- Cycle Length C, (sec) 115 115 Actual Green, G 69.0 69.0 Effective Green, g (sec) 72.0 72.0 Opposing Effective Green, go 72.0 72.0 Number of Lanes, N 1 1 Opposing Lanes, No 2 2 Adjusted Left -Turn Flow Rate, vLT 442 27 Proportion of LT, PLT 1.00 1.00 Opposing Flow Rate, vo (vph) 1668 789 Lost Time Per Phase, tL 2.0 2.0 Left Turns per Cycle, LTC=vLT*C/3600 14.12 0.86 Opp Flow (/Ln/Cycle), volc=vo*C/(3600*No) 26.64 12:60 Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo 1.00 1.00 gf=G**(-0.860*LTC**.629)-tL, gf<=g 0.00 0.00 Opp. Queue Ratio, qro=1-Rpo*(go/C) 0.37 0.37 gq 35.12 10.07 gu=g-gq (if gq<=gf then gu=g-gf) 36.88 61.93 fs=(875-.625*vo)/1000, fs>=0 0.00 0.38 PL=PLT[1+((N-1) *g/ (fs*gu+4.5) }] 1.00 1.00 EL1 8.20 5.77 fmin=2*(1+PL)/g 0.06 0.06 :m= [gf/g] + [gu/g] [1/ (1+PL (EL1-1) } ] 0.06 0.15 fLT = [fm + .91 * (N-1) ] / N 0.06 0.15 98 - 786 SIG/Cinema V1.0 ORGANIZATION: B & A P,_.iNERS, INC. SE 13TH STREET Q BRICKELL AVENUE SE 13TH ST /BRICKELL AVE Page-5 **************************************************************************** CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEET v s v/s g/C c X Lane Adj Flow Adj Sat Flow Green Capacity v/c App. Group (vph) ----- (vphg) ------ Ratio ----- Ratio ----- (vph) ------------ Ratio -------------- ---- ----- EB L 118 1624 0.07 0.16 254 0.46 LT 151 1710 0.09 0.16 268 0.56 * R 155 1412 0.11 0.16 221 0.70 WB L 108 -1624 0.07 0.17 268 0.40 * T 345 1710 0.20 0.17 283 1.22 R 14 1412 0.01 0.17 .233 0.06 NB * L 442 106 4.17 0.63 66 6.70 TR 789 3331 0.24 0.63 2085 0.38 SB L 27 255 0.11 0.63 160 0.17 T 1668 3352 0.50 0.63 2099 0.79 R 189 1412 0.13 0.63 884 0.21.. * Critical Lane Group Sum(v/s)crit = 4.48 Xc = 4.73 Cycle Length, C = 115 Sec Lost Time Per Cycle, L = 6.0 Sec LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEET ----- Delay 1 ------ --- Delay 2 --- -Ln Grp - -- App -- X g/C di DF c m d2 Delay Delay Lane v/c Green (sec Adj. Cap Calib (sec (sec (sec App Grp. Ratio Ratio /veh) Fact (vph) Param /veh) /veh) ----- LOS --- /veh) ----- LOS --- --- EB ---- L ----- 0.46 ----- 0.16 ----- 33.5 ---- 1.00 ----- 254 ----- 16.0 ----- 1.0 34.5 D 37.6 D LT 0.56 0.16 34.1 1.00 268 16.0 2.0 36.1 D R 0.70 0.16 34.9 1.00 221 16.0 6.4 41.3 E WB L 0.40 0.17 32.6 1.00 268 16.0 0.6 33.2 D - F T 1.22 0.17 - - 283 16.0 - - - R 0.06 0.17 30.8 1.00 233 16.0 0.0 30.8 D NB L 6.70 0.63 - - 66 16.0 - - - - F TR 0.38 0.63 8.0 0.85 2085 16.0 0.1 6.9 B SB L 0.17 0.63 6.8 0.85 160 16.0 0.0 5.9 B 11.2 B T 0.79 0.63 12.2 0.85 2099 16.0 1.6 11.9 B R 0.21 0.63 7.1 0.85 884 16.0 0.0 6.0 B Intersection - Delay invalid, X>1/PHF or X>1.2 Cycle = 115 Sec - F 98- 786 HCM Sunmary Resu . for Case: BCP13STO SE 13T► T /BRICIML AVE SE 13TH STREET 2 BRICHEU AVENUE 2008 BG+Con►+Pro,i Optim. Version 1.0 - Lane Grp - - App - Delay L Delay L 1525 Lane X (sect O (sect O 3 1 1 2 Grp v/s v/c veh) S veh) S 34 EB L 0.07 0.70 45.8 E 57.9 E i -- 335 LT 8.09 0.85 58.8 E 105 R *0.09 0.88 67.8 F t - -------- --------- WB L 0.07 0.55 38.5 D - F ----------------- T *8.20 1.66 - - ' t TtR 0.00 0.02 33.8 D 114 -r 146 t t NB Lper 0.25 24.5 C 201 Lpro *0.25 0.93# 41.8 E t TR 0.24 0.52 14.9 B t t 424 43 t 698 SE Lper 0.00 - F 1 2 .i�i� 3 4 , - Lpro 0.62 0.85# 3.9 A .i� f i • = T *0.50 1.18 - - 28 1 3 50 i l i 3 1 10 3 1 12 3 1 R 0.10 0.23 12.5 B Int. 1.04 1.12 - F #L TOTAL 98- 786 SIG/Cinema V1.0 ORGANIZATION: B & A PARTNERS, INC. SE 13TH STREET @ BRICKELL AVENUE SE 13TH ST /BRICKELL AVE Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION EAST APPROACH: SE 13TH ST NORTH APPROACH: BRICKELL AVE WEST APPROACH: SE 12TH TERR SOUTH APPROACH: BRICKELL AVE ANALYST: J. AHLSTEDT ANALYSIS DATE: /5/7/98 ANALYSIS PERIOD: 2000 BG+Com+Proj Optim. CASE: BCP13STO INTERSECTION GEOMETRY LANE LEFT TURN RIGHT TURN APPROACH OUTBOUND LENGTH ----POCKET--- ----POCKET--- APP. LANES LANES (FEET) LANES (FEET) LANES (FEET) EB 3 2 600 1 100 0 0 WB 3 2 600 1 100 0 0 NB 3 2 600 1 100 0 0 SB 4 2 600 1 100 1 100 MOVEMENTS SERVICED BY LANE AND LANE WIDTHS(FEET) LANE 1 LANE 2 LANE 3 LANE 4 LANE 5 LANE'6 APP. MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH ---------------------------------------------------------------- EB L 12.0 LT 12.0 R 12.0 WB L 12.0 T 12.0 R 12.0 NB L 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 SB L 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 R 12.0 L - EXCLUSIVE LEFT TURN T - EXCLUSIVE THROUGH LT - LEFT TURN / THROUGH TR - THROUGH / RIGHT TURN LR - LEFT TURN / RIGHT TURN R - EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TURN LTR - LEFT TURN / THROUGH / RIGHT TURN TRAFFIC VOLUMES CURRENT TRAFFIC VOLUMES (VPH) GROWTH FACTORS APP. -----------------=----------- LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR -------------- LEFT THRU RIGHT ---- EB ---- 114 ---- 146 ----- 201 ---- 75 -- 1.00 1.00 1.00 WB 105 335 34 30 1.00 1.00 1.00 NB 424 698 43 20 1.00 1.00 1.00 SB 26 1525 301 160 1.00 1.00 1.00 MOVEMENT VOLUMES (VPH) ---------------------- APP. LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR EB 114 146 201 75 WB 105 335 34 30 NB 424 698 43 20 SB 26 1525 301 160 PEAK HOUR FACTORS ----------------- LEFT THRU RIGHT 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 98- 786 SIG/Cinema V1.0 ORGANIZATION: B & A PA.,,_NERS, INC. SE 13TH STREET @ BRICKELL AVENUE SE 13TH ST /BRICKELL AVE Page-2 SIGNAL SETTINGS - OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS ---------- CONTROL TYPE : SEMI -ACTUATED PHASING: MOVEMENTS SERVICED APP. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB LTP WE LTP NB L LTP SE L LTP L=Left Turn; T=Through; R=Right, no Peds; P=Right w Ped conflict TIMING BY PHASE (SECONDS) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 --- Green 28.0 --- 50.0 --- 10.0 --- 12.0 --- 0.0 --- 0.0 --- 0.0 --- 0.0 Yellow 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 All Red 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0'.0 DURATION OF PEDESTRIAN ONLY PHASE (SECS) 0 CYCLE LENGTH (SECS) 115.0 LOST TIME PER PHASE (SECS) 2.0 TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY CONDITIONS AREA TYPE - CBD HEAVY VEHICLES PLATOON ARRIVAL TYPE EAST L T R 0 0 0 3 3 3 CONFLICTING PEDESTRIANS/HOUR PERCENT GRADE CURB PARKING NUMBER OF PARKING MANEUVERS/HOUR NUMBER OF BUSES STOPPING/HOUR PEDESTRIAN BUTTON MINIMUM GREEN TIME FOR PEDESTRIANS WEST NORTH SOUTH L T R L T- R L T R 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 EAST WEST NORTH SOUTH 50 50 50 50 0 0 0 0 N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N 23.0 23.0 17.0 17.0 9 8 - 786' SIG/Cinema V1.0 ORGANIZATION: B & A PAe,-rNERS, INC. SE 13TH STREET Q BRICKELL AVENUE SE 13TH ST /BRICKELL AVE Page-4 WORKSHEET FOR PERMITTED LEFT TURNS OPPOSED BY A MULTI -LANE APPROACH Cycle Length C, (sec) Actual Green, G Effective Green, g (sec) Opposing Effective Green, go Number of Lanes, N Opposing Lanes, No Adjusted Left -Turn Flow Rate, vLT Proportion of LT, PLT Opposing Flow Rate, vo (vph) Lost Time Per Phase, tL Left Turns per Cycle, LTC=vLT*C/3600 Opp Flow (/Ln/Cycle), volc=vo*C/(3600*No) Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo gf=G**(-0.860*LTC**.629)-tL, gf<=g Opp. Queue Ratio, qro=1-Rpo*(go/C) gq gu=g-gq (if gq<=gf then gu=g-gf) fs=(875-.625*vo)/1000, fs>=0 PL=PLT [1+((N-1) *g/ (fs*gu+4 . 5)) ] EL1 fmin=2* (1+PL) /g Fm= [gf/g] + [gu/g] [1/ (1+PL (EL1-1)) ] fLT = [fm + .91 * (N-1) ] / N EB WB NB SB 115 115 81.0 81.0 54.0 54.0 52.0 52.0 1 1 2 2 442 27 1.00 1.00 1668 789 0.0 0.0 14.12 0.86 26.64 12.60 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.55 0.55 54.00 17.68 0.00 36.32 0.00 0.38 1.00 1.00 8.20 5.77 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.12 0.07 0.12 98- 786 SIG/Cinema V1.0 * ORGANIZATION: B & A PARTNERS, INC. SE 13TH STREET @ BRICKELL AVENUE SE 13TH ST /BRICKELL AVE Page-5 SUPPLEMENTARY UNIFORM DELAY WORKSHEET ----------- EB WB NB SE Adjusted LT volume, v v/c ratio, X Primary phase effective green, g Secondary green interval, gq Secondary green interval, gu Red Time, r Arrivals: qa=v/(3600(max(X,1))) Primary phase departures, sp=s/3600 Secondary departures,ss=s(gq+gu)/(gu*3600) Xperm Xprot Case Queue at beginning of green arrow, Qa Queue at beginning of unsaturated green,Qi Residual queue, Qr Uniform delay, di 442 27 0.93 0.05 29.00 29.00 50.00 17.68 4.00 36.32 32.00 32.00 0.12 0.01 0.45 0.45 0.48 0.06 3.48 0.14 0.57 0.03 3 1 8.65 0.24 6.14 0.13 4.72 0.00 27.09 4.58 SIG/Cinema V1.0 ORGANIZATION: B & A PARTNERS, INC. SE 13TH STREET @ BRICKELL AVENUE SE 13TH ST /BRICKELL AVE Page-6 CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEET v s v/s g/C c X Lane Adj Flow Adj Sat Flow Green Capacity v/c App. Group (vph) ------ (vphg) ------ Ratio ----- Ratio ----- (vph) -------------------------- Ratio ---- ----- EB L 118 1624 0.07 0.10 169 0.70 LT 151 1710 0.09 0.10 178 0.85 * R 130 1412 0.09 0.10 147 0.88 WB L 108 1624 0.07 0.12 198 0.55 * T 345 1710 0.20 0.12 208 1.66 R 4 1412 0.00 0.12 -172 0.02 NB Lper 32 127 0.25 0.47 63 0.51 * Lpro 410 1624 0.25 0.25 410 473# 1.00 0.93# TR 789 3331 0.24 0.45 1506 0.52 SB Lper 0 198 0.00 0.47 93 0.00 Lpro 27 1624 0.02 0.25 410 503# 0.07 0.05# * T 1668 3352 0.50 0.45 1516 1.10•. R 147 1412 0.10 0.45 638 0.23 * Critical Lane Group # Left Movement Total Sum(v/s)crit = 1.04 Xc = 1.12 Cycle Length, C = 115 Sec Lost Time Per Cycle, L = 8.0 Sec LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEET ----- Delay 1 ------ --- Delay 2 --- -Ln Grp - -- App -- X g/C di DF c m d2 Delay Delay Lane v/c Green (sec Adj. Cap Calib (sec (sec (sec App Grp. Ratio Ratio /veh) Fact (vph) Param /veh) /veh) LOS ----- --- /veh) ----- LOS --- --- EB ---- L ----- 0.70 ----- 0.10 ----- 37.8 ---- 1.00 ----- 169 ----- 16.0 ----- 8.0 45.8 E 57.9 E LT 0.85 0.10 38.5 1.00 178 16.0 20.3 58.8 E R 0.88 0.10 38.6 1.00 147 16.0 29.2 67.8 F WB L 0.55 0.12 36.1 1.00 198 16.0 2.4 38.5 D - F T 1.66 0.12 - - 208 16.0 - - - R 0.02 0.12 33.8 1.00 172 16.0 0.0 33.8 D NB L 0.93 0.72 27.1 0.85 473 16.0 18.7 41.8 E 24.5 C TR 0.52 0.45 17.2 0.85 1506 16.0 0.3 14.9 B SB L 0.05 0.72 4.6 0.85 503 16.0 0.0 3.9 A F T 1.10 0.45 - - 1516 16.0 - - ' R 0.23 0.45 14.6 0.85 638 16.0 0.0 12.5 B Intersection - Delay invalid, X>1/PHF or X>1.2 Cycle = 115 Sec - F 9 8 - 78b HCS: Signalized T_n' -section Version 2.4e 05-07-1998 1 Jackson M. Ahlstedt, P.E. 46 N.W. 94 St. Miami Shores, FL 331505 (305) 754-8695 Streets: (N-S) BRICKELL AVENUE (E-W) SE 13TH ST Analyst: J. AHLSTEDT File Name: BCP-13ST.HC9 Area Type: CBD 5-7-98 PM PEAK Comment: YR 2000 BG+COMM+PROJ ---------------- ------------ No. Lanes Volumes PHF or PK15 Lane W (ft)' Grade % Heavy Veh Parking Bus Stops Con. Peds Ped Button Arr Type RTOR Vols Lost Time ------------ Traffic ---------------- Northbound L T R 1 2 < 0 424 698 43 0.96 0.96 0.96 12.0 12.0 0 0 2 0 N N 0 50 (YIN) N 3 3 20 2.00 2.00 2.00 ---------------- and Roadway Cc ---------------- Southbound L T R 1 2 1 26 1525 301 0.96 0.96 0.96 12.0 12.0 12.0 0 0 2 0 N N 0 50 (YIN)- N 3 3 3 120 2.00 2.00 2.00 --------------- )nditions ---------------- Eastbound L T R 1 > 1 1 114 146 201 0.97 0.97 0.97, 12.0 12.0 12.0 0 0 0 0 N N 0 50 (YIN) N 3 3 3 50 2.00 2.00 2.00 --------------- Signal Operations --------------- Westbound L T R 1 1 1 105 335 34 0.97 0.97 0.97 12.0 12.0 12.0 0 0 0 0 N N 0 50 (YIN) N 3 ­3 3 20 2.00 2.00 2.00 Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NB Left * EB Left Thru * Thru Right * Right Peds Peds SB Left Thru Right Peds EB Right WB Right Green 69.OP Yellow/AR 5.0 Cycle Length: 115 secs WB Left Thru Right Peds NB Right SB Right Green 15.OA 16.OA Yellow/AR 5.0 5.0 Phase combination order: #1 #5 #6 8 98- 786 HCS: Signalized In -sec'ion Version 2.4e 05-07-1998 2 ------------------------ Streets: (N-S) BRICKELL AVENUE (E-W) SE 13TH ST Analyst: J. AHLSTEDT File Name: BCP_13ST.HC9 Area Type: CBD 5-7-98 PM PEAK Comment: YR 2000 BG+COMM+PROJ Volume Adjustment Worksheet Direc- Lane Lane Adj tion/ Mvt Adj Lane Grp No. Util Growth Grp Prop Prop Mvt Vol PHF Vol Grp Vol Ln Fact Fact Vol LT RT ----- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- -- ----- ------ ---- ---- ---- NB Left 424 0.96 442 L 442 1 1.000 1.000 442 1.00 0.00 Thru 698 0.96 727 TR 751 2 1.050 1.000 789 0.00 0.03 Right 43 0.96 24 SB Left 26 0.96 27 L 27 1 1.000' 1.000 27 1.00 0.00 Thru 1525 0.96 1589 T 1589 2 1.050 1.000 1668 0.00 0.00 Right 301 0.96 189 R 189 1 1.000 1.000 189 0.00 1.00 EB Left 114 0.97 118 L 118 1 1.000 1.000 118 1.00 0.00 Thru 146 0.97 151 LT 151 1 1.000 1.000 151 0.00 0.00 Right 201 0.97 155 R 155 1 1.000 1.000 155 0.00 1.00 WB Left 105 0.97 108 L 108 1 1.000 1.000 108 1.00' 0.00 Thru 335 0.97 345 T 345 1 1.000 1.000 345 0.00 0.00 Right 34 0.97 14 R 14 1 1.000 1.000 14 0.00 1.00 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Saturation Flow Adjustment Worksheet ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Ideal Adj Direction Sat No. f f f f f f f f Sat /LnGrp Flow Lns W HV G p BB A RT LT Flow ------ ---- --- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- NB L 1900 1 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 1.00 0.06 107 TR 1900 2 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 3337 SB L 1900 1 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 1.00 0.15 255 T 1900 2 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 3353 R 1900 1 1.'00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 0.85 1.00 1454 EB L 1900 1 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 1.00 0.95 1624 LT 1900 1 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 1710 R 1900 1 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 0.85 1.00 1454 WB L 1900 1 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 1.00 0.95 1624 T 1900 1 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 1710 R 1900 1 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 0.85 1.00 1454 90 -- 786 HCS: Signalized Int section Yversion 2.4e 05-07-1998 3 Streets: (N-S) BRICKELL AVENUE (E-W) SE 13TH ST Analyst: J. AHLSTEDT File Name: BCP_13ST.HC9 Area Type: CBD 5-7-98 PM PEAK Comment: YR 2000 BG+COMM+PROJ Supplemental Permitted LT Worksheet APPROACH NB Cycle Length, C 115 Actual Green Time for Lane Group, G 69 Effective Green Time for Lane Group, g 72 Opposing Effective Green Time, go 72 Number of Opposing Lanes, No 2 Number of Lanes in Lane Group, N 1 Adjusted Left -Turn Flow Rate, Vlt 442 Proportion of Left Turns in Lane Group, Pit 1.00 Left Turns per Cycle: LTC=Vlt*C/3600 14.12 Adjusted Opposing Flow Rate, Vo 1668 Opposing Flow per Lane, Per Cycle: Volc=VoC/3600No 26.64 Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo. 1 Lost time per phase, tl 2 gf=Gexp(-0.882*LTC^0.717)-tl 0.00 Opposing Queue Ratio: qro=1-Rpo(go/C) 0.37 gq = Volc * qro / (.5 - Volc * (1 - qro) / go)-tl 35.12 gu=g-gq (or g-9f) 36.88 fs=(875-0.625Vo)/1000 0.00 P1=Plt[1+((N-1)g/(fs*gu+4.5))] 1.00 Ell 8.20 fmin 0.06 fm,(min=fmin;max=1.00) 0.06 ` flt=[fm+0.91(N-1)]/N 0.06 APPROACH SB Cycle Length, C 115 Actual Green Time for Lane Group, G 69 Effective Green Time for Lane Group, g 72 Opposing Effective Green Time, go 72 Number of Opposing Lanes, No 2 Number of Lanes in Lane Group, N 1 Adjusted Left -Turn Flow Rate, Vlt 27 Proportion of Left Turns in Lane Group, Pit 1.00 Left Turns per Cycle: LTC=Vlt*C/3600 0.86 Adjusted Opposing Flow Rate, Vo .789 Opposing Flow per Lane, -Per Cycle: Volc=VoC/3600No 12.60 Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo 1 Lost time per phase, tl 2 gf=Gexp(-0.882*LTC^0.717)-tl 0.00 Opposing Queue Ratio: qro=1-Rpo(go/C) 0.37 gq = Volc * qro / (.5 - Volc * (1 - qro) / go)-tl 10.07 gu=g-gq (or g-gf) 61.93 fs=(875-0.625Vo)/l000 0.38 P1=Plt[l+((N-1)g/(fs*gu+4.5))] 1.00 Ell 5.77 fmin 0.06 fm,(min=fmin;max=1.00) 0.15 flt=[fm+0.91(N-1)]/N 0.15 98- 786 HCS: Signalized In' --section Version 2.4e 05-07-1998 4 Streets: (N-S) BRICKELL AVENUE (E-W) SE 13TH ST Analyst: J. AHLSTEDT File Name: BCP_13ST.HC9 Area Type: CBD 5-7-98 PM PEAK Comment: YR 2000 BG+COMM+PROJ Capacity Analysis Worksheet ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Adj Adj Sat Flow Lane Group Direction Flow Rate Flow Rate Ratio Green Ratio Capacity v/c /LnGrp (v) (s) (v/s) (g/C)" (c) Ratio --------- --------- -------------------------- ----- NB L 442 107 4.138 0.626 67 6.610 TR 789 3337 0.236 0.626 2089 0.378 SB L 27 255 0.106 0.626 160 0.169 T 1668 3353 0.497 0.626 2099 0.795 R 189 1454 0.130 0.626 910 0.208 EB L 118 1624 0.073 0.157 254 0.464 LT 151 1710 0.088 0.157 268 0.564 R 155 1454 0.107 0.157 228 0.681 * WB L 108 1624 0.066 0.165 268 0.402 T 345 1710 0.202 0.165 283 1:221 * R 14 1454 0.010 0.165 240 0.058 Sum (v/s) critical = 4.447 Lost ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Time/Cycle, L = 6.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 4.692 Level of Service Worksheet ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Delay Del Lane Calib Delay Lane Lane Delay LOS' Direction v/c g/C d Adj Group d d Grp Grp By By /LnGrp Ratio Ratio 1 Fact Cap 2 2 Del LOS App App ------- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ---- ----- --- L 6.610 0.626 * 0.850 67 16 TR 0.378 0.626 8.0 0.850 2089 16 0.1 6.9 B SB L 0.169 0.626 6.8 0.850 160 16 0.1 5.9 B 11.2 B T 0.795 0.626 12.2 0.850 2099 16 1.6 11.9 B R 0.208 0.626 7.0 0.850 910 16 0.0 6.0 B EB L 0.464 0.157 33.5 0.850 254 16 1.0 29.5 D 32.1 D LT 0.564 0.157 34.1 0.850 268 16 2.0 31.0 D R 0.681 0.157 34.8 0.850 228 16 5.5 35.0 D WB L 0.402 0.165 32.6 0.850 268 16 0.6 28.3 D T 1.221 0.165 * 0.850 283 16 R 0.058 0.165 30.7 0.850 240 16 0.0 26.1 D Intersection Delay = * (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = * ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Delay and LOS not meaningful when any v/c is greater than 1.2 or 1/PHF 98- 786 HCS: Signalized In'-rsection Version 2.4e 05-07-1998 1 Jackson M. Ahlstedt, P.E. 46 N.W. 94 St. Miami Shores, FL 331505 (305) 754-8695 Streets: (N-S) BRICKELL AVENUE (E-W) SE 13TH ST Analyst: J. AHLSTEDT File Name: BCPI3STO.HC9 Area Type: CBD 5-7-98 PM PEAK Comment: YR 2000 BG+COMM+PROD OPT ------------ No. Lanes Volumes PHF or PK15 Lane W (ft) Grade % Heavy Veh Parking Bus Stops Con. Peds Ped Button Arr Type RTOR Vols Lost Time ------------ Traffic --------------- Northbound L T R 1 2 < 0 424 698 43 0.96 0.96 0.96 12.0 12.0 0 0 2 0 N N 0 50 (Y/N) N 3 3 20 2.00 2.00 2.00 --------------- and Roadway Cc --------------- Southbound L T R 1 2 1 26 1525 301 0.96 0.96 0.96 12.0 12.0 12.0 0 0 2 0 N N 0 50 (Y/N) N 3 3 3 120 2.00 2.00 2.00 nditions --------------- Eastbound L T R 1 > 1 1 114 146 201 0.97 0.97 0.97 12.0 12.0 12.0 0 0 0 0 N N 0 50 (Y/N) N 3 3 3 50 2.00 2.00 2.00 --------------- Westbound L T R 1 1 1 105 335 34 0.97 0.97 0.97 12.0 12.0 12.0 0 0 0 0 N N 0 50 (Y/N) N 3 3 3 20 2.00 2.00 2.00 --------------- Signal Operations ------------------------------------------------------------------ Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NB Left * * EB Left Thru * Thru Right * Right Peds Peds SB Left Thru Right Peds EB Right WB Right Green 28.OA 50.OP Yellow/AR 3.0 4.0 WB Left Thru Right Peds NB Right ISB Right Green 10.0A 12.OA Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0 Cycle Length: 115 secs Phase combination order: #1 #2 #5 #6 8 §R- "ERR HCS: Signalized Int section Version 2.4e 05-07-1998 2 Streets: (N-S) BRICKELL AVENUE (E-W) SE 13TH ST Analyst: J. AHLSTEDT File Name: BCPI3STO.HC9 Area Type: CBD 5-7-98 PM PEAK Comment: YR 2000 BG+COMM+PROJ OPT Volume Adjustment Worksheet Direc- Lane Lane Adj tion/ Mvt Adj Lane Grp No. Util Growth Grp Prop Prop Mvt ----- Vol ---- PHF ---- Vol ---- Grp ---- Vol ---- Ln -- Fact' ----- Fact ------ Vol ---- LT RT NB ---- ---- Left 424 0.96 442 L 442 1 1.000 1.000 442 1.00 0.00 Thru 698 0.96 727 TR 751 2 1.050 1.000 789 0.00 0.03 Right 43 0.96 24 SB Left 26 0.96 27 L 27 1- 1.000 1.000 27 1.00 0.00 Thru 1525 0.96 1589 T 1589 2 1.050 1.000 1668 0.00 0.00 Right 301 0.96 189 R 189 1 1.000 1.000 189 0.00 1.00 EB Left 114 0.97 118 L 118 1 1.000 1.000 118 1.00 0.00 Thru 146 0.97 151 LT 151 1 1.000 1.000 151 0.00 0.00 Right 201 0.97 155 R 155 1 1.000 1.000 155 0.00 1.00 WB Left 105 0.97 108 L 108 1. 1.000 1.000 108 1.00. 0.00 Thru 335 0.97 345 T 345 1 1.000 1.000 345 0.00 0.00 Right ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 34 0.97 14 R 14 1 1.000 1.000 14 0.00 1.00 ------------------------------------------------------- Saturation Flow Adjustment Worksheet Ideal Direction Sat No. f f f f f f /LnGrp ------ Flow ---- Lns W HV --- ----- ----- G p ----- ----- BB A ----- ----- NB L 1900 1 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 TR 1900 2 1.00 0.98 1.00. 1.00 1.00 0.90 SB L T R EB L LT R WB L T R 1900 1 1900 2 1900 1 1900 1 1900 1 1900 1 1900 1 1900 1 1900 1 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 1.00 0.90 1.00 0.90 1.00 0.90 1.00 0.90 1.00 0.90 1.00 0.90 1.00 0.90 1.00 0.90 Adj f f Sat RT LT Flow 0.07 127 1.00 0.95 1624 1.00 1.00 3337 0.12 199 1.00 0.95 1624 1.00 1.00 3353 0.85 1.00 1454 1.00 0.95 1624 1.00 1.00 1710 0.85 1.00 1454 1.00 0.95 1624 1.00 1.00 1710 0.85 1.00 1454 HCS: Signalized In; -section Version 2.4e 05-07-1998 3 Streets: (N-S) BRICKELL AVENUE (E-W) SE 13TH ST Analyst: J. AHLSTEDT File Name: BCPI3STO.HC9 Area Type: CBD 5-7-98 PM PEAK Comment: YR 2000 BG+COMM+PROJ OPT ------------------------ ---------------------- Supplemental Permitted LT Worksheet APPROACH NB Cycle Length, C 115 Actual Green Time for Lane Group, G 81 Effective Green Time for Lane Group, g 54 Opposing Effective Green Time, go 52 Number of Opposing Lanes, No 2 Number of Lanes in Lane Group, N 1 Adjusted Left -Turn Flow Rate, Vlt 442 Proportion of Left Turns in Lane Group, Plt 1.00 Left Turns per Cycle: LTC=Vlt*C/3600 14.12 Adjusted Opposing Flow Rate, Vo 1668 Opposing Flow per Lane, Per Cycle: Volc=VoC/3600No 26.64 Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo 1 Lost time per phase, ti 0 gf=Gexp(-0.882*LTC^0.717)-tl 0.00 Opposing Queue Ratio: qro=1-Rpo(go/C) 0.55 gq = Volc * qro / (.5 - Volc * (1 - qro) / go)-tl 54.00 gu=g-gq (or g-gf) 0.00 fs=(875-0.625Vo)/1000 0.00 P1=Plt[l+((N-1)g/(fs*gu+4.5))] 1.00 Ell 8.20 fmin 0.07 fm,(min=fmin;max=1.00) 0.07 flt=[fm+0.91(N-1)]/N 0.07 APPROACH SB Cycle Length, C 115 Actual Green Time for Lane Group, G 81 Effective Green Time for Lane Group, g 54 Opposing Effective Green Time, go 52 Number of Opposing Lanes, No 2 Number of Lanes in Lane Group, N 1 Adjusted Left -Turn Flow Rate, Vlt 27 Proportion of Left Turns in Lane Group, Plt 1.00 Left Turns per Cycle: LTC=Vlt*C/3600 0.86 Adjusted Opposing Flow Rate, Vo 789 Opposing Flow per Lane,* Per Cycle: Volc=VoC/3600No 12.60 Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo 1 Lost time per phase, tl 0 gf=Gexp(-0.882*LTC^0.717)-tl 0.00 Opposing Queue Ratio: qro=1-Rpo(go/C) 0.55 gq = Volc * qro / (.5 - Volc * (1 - qro) / go)-tl 17.68 gu=g-gq (or g-gf) 36.32 fs=(875-0.625Vo)/1000 0.38 P1=Plt[l+((N-1)9/(fs*gu+4.5))] 1.00 Ell 5.77 fmin 0.07 fm,(min=fmin;max=1.00) 0.12 flt=[fm+0.91(N-1)]/N 0.12 HCS: Signalized Int section Version 2.4e 05-07-1998 4 Streets: (N-S) BRICKELL AVENUE (E-W) SE 13TH ST Analyst: J. AHLSTEDT File Name: BCPI3STO.HC9 Area Type: CBD 5-7-98 PM PEAK Comment: YR 2000 BG+COMM+PROD OPT Capacity Analysis Worksheet Adj Adj Sat Flow Lane Group Direction Flow Rate Flow Rate Ratio Green Ratio Capacity v/c /LnGrp (v) --------- (s) --------- (v/s) ----- . (g/C) ----------- (c) ---------- Ratio ----- --------- NB Lsec. 32 127 0.252 0.470 63 0.508 Lpri. 410 1624 0.252 0.252 410 0.508 Ltot. 442 473 0.934 TR 789 3337 0.236 0.452 1509 0.523 SB Lsec. 0 199 0.000 0.47.0 93 0.000 Lpri. 27 1624 0.017 0.2752 410 0.000 Ltot. 27 503 0.054 T 1668 3353 0.497 0.452 1516 1.100 R 189 1454 0.130 0.452 657 0.288 EB L 118 1624 0.073 0.104 170 0.696 LT 151 1710 0.088 0.104 178 0.846 R 155 1454 0.107 0.104 152 1.022 * WB L 108 1624 0.066 0.122 198 0.546 T 345 1710 0.202 0.122 208 1.657 * R 14 1454 0.010 0.122 177 0.079 Sum (v/s) critical = 1.058 Lost Time/Cycle, ----------------------------------------------------------------------- L = 8.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 1.137 Level of Service Worksheet Delay Del Lane Calib Delay Lane Lane Delay LOS. Direction v/c g/C d Adj Group d d Grp Grp By By /LnGrp --------- Ratio Ratio ----- ----- 1 ----- Fact ----- Cap ----- 2 ----- 2 ----- Del LOS ---- ---- App ----- App --- NB L 0.934 0.722 27.1 0.850 473 16 18.7 41.8 E 24.5 C TR 0.523 0.452 17.2 0.850 1509 16 0.3 14.9 B SB L 0.054 0.722 4.6 0.850 503 16 0.0 3.9 A T 1.100 0.452 * 0.850 1516 16 R 0.288 0.452 15.1 0.850 657 16 0.1 12.9 B EB L 0.696 0.104 37.8 0.850 170 16 7.9 40.0 D 65.3 F LT 0.846 0.104 38.5 0.850 178 16 20.0 52.7 E R 1.022 0.104 39.1 0.850 152 16 63.4 96.7 F WB L 0.546 0.122 36.1 0.850 198 16 2.4 33.1 D T 1.657 0.122 * 0.850 208 16 R 0.079 0.122 34.0 0.850 177 16 0.0 28.9 D Intersection Delay = * (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = * Delay --------------------------------------------------------•--------------- and LOS not meaningful when any v/c is greater than 1.2 or 1/PHF ��- '786 HCS: Signalized Int section Version 2.4e 05-07-1998 5 Streets: (N-S) BRICKELL AVENUE (E-W) SE 13TH ST Analyst: J. AHLSTEDT File Name: BCPI3STO.HC9 Area Type: CBD 5-7-98 PM PEAK Comment: YR 2000 BG+COMM+PROJ OPT Supplemental Uniform Delay Worksheet Approach Northbound Adj. LT Vol (v) 442 v/c ratio (x) 0.93 Primary phase effective green 29.00 gq from Supplemental LT Worksheet 50.00 gu from Supplemental LT Worksheet 4.00 Red time (r) 32.00 Arrivals qa = v/(3600(max(x,l))) 0.12 Primary Ph. Departures Sp=s/3600 0.45 Secondary Ph. Departures Ss=S(Gq+Gu)/(Gu*3600). 0.48 Xperm 3.48 Xprot 0.57 Case 3 Queue at begining of green arrow (Qa) 8.65 Queue at beginning of unsaturated green (Qu) 6.14 Residual queue (Qr) 4.72 Uniform Delay 27.09 Approach Southbound Adj. LT Vol (v) 27 v/c ratio (x) 0.05 Primary phase effective green 29.00 gq from Supplemental LT Worksheet 17.68 gu from Supplemental LT Worksheet 36.32 Red time (r) 32.00 Arrivals qa = v/(3600(max(x,l))) 0.01 Primary Ph. Departures Sp=s/3600 0.45 Secondary Ph. Departures Ss=S(Gq+Gu)/(Gu*3600) 0.08 Xperm 0.14 Xprot 0.03 Case 1 Queue at begining of green arrow (Qa) 0.24 Queue at beginning of unsaturated green (Qu) 0.13 Residual queue (Qr) 0.00 Uniform Delay 4.58 ;J "7 8 Appendix 7: FDOT ART -TAB Analysis for Year 2000 Traffic Conditions. 98- 7S6 ART -TAB Version 2.0 Arterial Level of Service Volume Tables Based on Chapter 11 of the 1994 Highway Capacity Manual Update Florida Department of. Transportation DESCRIPTION ROAD NAME: Brickell Avenue From: SE 15 Road To: SE 13 Street PEAK »»»»» PEAK DIRECTION: NS Study Time Period: PM PEAK Analysis Date: July 29, 199T Number of Lanes:4 LD AADT: 25,000 User Notes: Year 2000 BG + Project Cond. File:208GP N8.WK1 FFIC CHARACTERISTICS —Range— K FACTOR: 0.087 (0.06 - 0.20) D FACTOR: 0.661 (0.50 - 1.00) PHF: 0.960 (0.70 -1.00) ADJ. SATURATION FLOW RATE 1.850 (1400 - 2000) % TURNS FROM EXCLUSIVE LANES: 37 0 - 100 ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS URBAN, TRANSITIONING. OR RURAL AREA TYPE U (U. T. or R) ARTERIAL CLASS: 2 (1, 2, or 3) FREE FLOW SPEED (mph): 35 (40,35.30.25) TOTAL LENGTH OF ARTERIAL (mil: 0.27 MEDIANS (YIN): y LEFT TURN BAYS IN 1GNAL17ATION CHARACTERISTICS NO. SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS: 1 ARRIVAL TYPE, PEAK DIRECTION: 3 (1.2.3.4,5 or 6) TYPE SIGNAL SYSTEM: P (P. S. or A) (P=Prebmed, S=SemiaCustaQ A=Actueted) SYSTEM CYCLE LENGTH (sec): 115 (60 -180) WEIGHTED THRU MOVEMENT C: 0.,C 0.20 - 0.80 PEAK HOUR PEAK DIRECTION VOLUME (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) 33103704 tntrrsaetiene Mrs mils Level of Service L.WFS A B C D E 1 WA NIA 490 1.030 1.220 2 NIA WA 1,000 2.190 Z,480 3 WA WA i,S10 3,340 3,760 4 N/A NIA 2.020 4,500 5,040 PEAK HOUR VOLUME (BOTH DIRECTIONS) (Includes vehicles in exclusive tum lanes) 33 70370A Int 6 inn: _r mil Level of Service L ANFS A B C D E 2 NIA NIA 740 1,560 1,840 4 NIA NIA 1,510 3,320 3,760 6 NIA NIA 2.280 S,060 5.690 8 NIA NIA 3.060 6,310 7,620 AVERAGE ANNUAL DAILY TRAFFIC (AADT) (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) 3 703704 Intrrsediona pAr mile Level of Service LANu A B C D E 2 NIA WA 8,500 17,900 21200 4 WA WA 17.400 38,200 43200 6 NIA WA 26.200 58,100 65,400 8 NIA WA 35200 78,300 87,600 A means the level of service is not achievable Peak Hour Peak Direction Through/Right vie Ratio for Full Hour Level of Service L.ANO A B C D E 1 WA WA 0.39 0.82 0.96 2 WA WA 0.40 0.87 0.95 3 WA WA 0.40 0.88 0.99 4 NIA NIA 0.40 0.89 1.00 98- 786 ART -TAB Version 2.0 Arterial Level of Service Volume Tables Based on Chapter 11 of the 1994 Highway Capacity Manual Update Florida Department of Transportation Aucust 1995 DESCRIPTION ROAD NAME:Brickell Avenue Frorn:SE 13 Street To: SE 15 Road PEAK >»»»»> PEAK DIRECTION: SS Study Time Period: PM PEAK Analysis Date: July 29, 1997 Number of Lanes:4 L-D AADT:25,000 User Notes: Year 2000 BG + Project Cond, FIe:20BGP SS.WK1 FFIC CHARACTERISTICS -Ra ng e- K FACTOR: 0.087 (0.06 - 0.20) D FACTOR: 0.661 (0.50 - 1.00) PHF: 0.960 (0.70 - 1.00) ADJ. SATURATION FLOW RATE: 1,850 (1400 - 2000) - -TURNS FROM EXCLUSIVE LANES:_ 3 (0 - 100) ADWAY CHARACTERISTICS URBAN, TRANSfTIONING, OR RURAL AREA TYPE: U (U, T. or R) ARTERIAL CLASS: 2 (1, 2, or 3) FREE FLOW SPEED (mph): 35 (40,35,30,25) TOTAL LENGTH OF ARTERIAL (m): 0.27 MEDIANS (YIN): y LEFT TURN BAYS (YIN): y 3NALIZATION CHARACTERIsTICS NO. SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS: 1 ARRNALTYPE, PEAK DIRECTION: 3 (1,2.3,4,5 or 6) TYPE SIGNAL SYSTEM: S (P, S, or A) (P=Pm5med, S=Semieetuared, A=Actuated) SYSTEM CYCLE LENGTH (see): 115 (60 -180) WEIGHTED THRU MOVEMENT a/C: 0.80 (0.20 - 0.80) PEAK HOUR.PEAK MOTION ON VOL M (Includes vehicles in exclusive trim lanes) 3 703704 lnterseetions nwr mile , Level of Service LANES A B C D E 1 NIA 1,160 1,370 1,480 1,530 2 NIA 2.430 2.830 3,000 3,050 3 NIA 3.730 4,320 4,520 4,580 4 NIA 5,060 5,840 6,050 6,100 PEAK HOUR VOLUME (BOT DIRl=CT10Ns) (Includes vehicles in exclusive rum lanes) 3-703704 tMersectiens per ttWlS Level of Service LANES A B C D E 2 NIA 1,760 2,080 2,290 2.310 4 NIA 3,670 4280 4,530 4,620 6 NIA 5,650 6,540 6,840 6,920 8 WA 7,6W 8,830 9,150 9-130 AVERAGE ANNUAL DAILY IC (AAD , (Includes vehicles in exclusive tam lanes) 3 703764 Imcrsections eer mile Level of Service LANES A S • C D E 2 NIA 20,200 23,900 25,700 26= 4 WA 142,200 49,200 5Z,100 53.100 6 WA 64,900 75,200 78,600 79,800 8 NIA 88,000 101,500 105,200 106.100 /A means the level of service is not achievable Peak Hour Peak Direction Through/Right vie Ratio for Full Hour Level of Service LANES A B C D E 1 NIA 0.76 0.90 0-97 1.00 2 WA 0.80 0,93 0.98 1.00 3 WA 0.82 0.94 0.99 1.00 4 NIA 0.83 0.96 0.99 1.00 Appendix 8: Intersection of Brickell Avenue and SE 14t' Terrace - HCM and TRAF-NETSIM Analysis for Year 2000 Traffic Conditions. 98- 786 HCM Summary Resu . .. for Case: 14TH-TER SE 14TH LERR/BR ICI(ELL AVE Committed + Project Traffic PH Peak / Year 2000 Version 1.8 - Lane Grp - - App 2090 Delay L Delay L Lane X (sec/ 0 (sec/ D Grp v/s v/c veh) S veh) S I I � I I 436 I I I rt I 22 WE L *8.81 0.09 26.9 D 25.5 D I I R 8.30 0.79 25.4 D ► �t I I I I MB TR 8.27 0.47 11.4 B 11.4 B I I ► I � I I I I I t 17 I I 750 SB Lper 0.88 18.8 B 1 IL L 2 `'. { 3 L Lpro 0.22 8.74# 22.1 C IN 4 1 T *8.73 0.98 9.2 B 24 4 62 1 15 Int. 0.74 0.77 12.5 B #L TOTAL 98— 7S6 SIG/Cinema V1.0 ORGANIZATION: B & A PARTNERS, INC. Committed + Project Traffic SE 14TH TERR/BRICKELL AVE Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION EAST APPROACH: NORTH APPROACH: BRICKELL AVE WEST APPROACH: SE 14TH TERR SOUTH APPROACH: BRICKELL AVE ANALYST: J. AHLSTEDT ANALYSIS DATE: 5/7/98 ANALYSIS PERIOD: PM Peak / Year 2000 CASE: 14TH TER INTERSECTION GEOMETRY LANE LEFT TURN RIGHT TURN APPROACH OUTBOUND LENGTH ----POCKET--- ----POCKET--- APP. LANES LANES (FEET) LANES (FEET) LANES (FEET) ----- ------ ---- EB ----- 0 ----- 1 ------ 0 ----- 0 ------ 0 0 0 WB 2 0 600 0 0 0 0 NB 2 2 600 0 0 0 0 SB 3 2 600 1 150 0 0 MOVEMENTS SERVICED BY LANE AND LANE WIDTHS(FEET) LANE 1 LANE 2 LANE 3 LANE 4 LANE 5 LANE 6 APP. MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH ---------- MOV. WIDTH MOV. -------------------- WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH -------------------- ---- EB ---------- WB L 12.0 R 12.0 NB T 12.0 TR 12.0 SB L 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 L - EXCLUSIVE LEFT TURN T - EXCLUSIVE THROUGH LT - LEFT TURN / THROUGH TR - THROUGH / RIGHT TURN LR - LEFT TURN / RIGHT TURN R - EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TURN LTR - LEFT TURN / THROUGH / RIGHT TURN TRAFFIC VOLUMES CURRENT TRAFFIC VOLUMES (VPH) GROWTH FACTORS APP. ----------------------------- LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR -------------- LEFT THRU RIGHT ---- ----- ---- EB ---- 0 ---- 0 ----- 0 ---- 0 ---- WE 22 0 436 50 1.00 1.00 NB 0 750 17 0 1.00 1.00 SB 310 2090 0 0 1.00 1.00 MOVEMENT VOLUMES ( VPH ) ---------------------- APP. LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR EB 0 0 0 0 _ WE 22 0 436 50 NB 0 750 17 0 SB 310 2090 0 0 PEAK HOUR FACTORS ----------------- LEFT THRU RIGHT 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 018 8' 786 SIG/Cinema V1.0 ORGANIZATION: B & A P�TNERS, INC. Committed + Project Traffic SE 14TH TERR/BRICKELL AVE Page-2 SIGNAL SETTINGS - OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS CONTROL TYPE : SEMI -ACTUATED PHASING: MOVEMENTS SERVICED APP. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB WE R L R NB TR SB LT LT L=Left Turn; T=Through; R=Right, no Peds; P=Right w Ped conflict TIMING BY PHASE (SECONDS) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 --- Green 24.0 --- 62.0 --- 15.0 --- 0.0 --- 0.0 --- 0.0 --- 0.0 --- 0.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0..0 All Red 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 DURATION OF PEDESTRIAN ONLY PHASE (SECS) 0 CYCLE LENGTH (SECS) 115.0 LOST TIME PER PHASE (SECS) 2.0 TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY CONDITIONS AREA TYPE - CBD EAST L T R HEAVY VEHICLES PLATOON ARRIVAL TYPE CONFLICTING PEDESTRIANS/HOUR PERCENT GRADE CURB PARKING NUMBER OF PARKING MANEUVERS/HOUR NUMBER OF BUSES STOPPING/HOUR PEDESTRIAN BUTTON MINIMUM GREEN TIME FOR PEDESTRIANS WEST NORTH SOUTH L T R L T R L T R --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 0 2 2' 1 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 EAST WEST NORTH SOUTH 20 50 0 0 0 N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N 17.5 11.5 11.5 98- 786 SIG/Cinema V1.0 ORGANIZATION: B & A PARTNERS, INC. Committed + Project Traffic SE 14TH TERR/BRICKELL AVE Page-3 VOLUME ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET v v P g Peak Lane U v Current Mvt Mvt Group Lane Adj. Vol Growth Vol Flow Lane Flow N Util Flow Proportion App Mvt (vph) Factor (vph) PHF (vph) --- --- ----- ------ ----- --- ----- Grp. (vph) ---- ----- Lns Fact --- ---- (vph) LT RT ----- ---- ---- WB L 22 1.00 22 0.90 24 L 24. 1 1.00 24 1.00 0.00, T 0 1.00 0 0.90 0 R 428 1 1.00 428 0.00 1.00 R 436 1.00 436 0.90 428+ NB L 0 1.00 0 0.90 0 TR 852 2 1.05 895 0.00 0.02 T 750 1.00 750 0.90 833 R 17 1.00 17 0.90 19 SB L 310 1.00 310 0.90 344 L 344 1 1.00 344 1.00 0.00 T 2090 1.00 2090 0.90 2322 T 2322 2 1.05 2438 0.00 0.00 R 0 1.00 0 0.90 0 RTOR volume not included f SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET Ideal Lane Heavy Bus Area Right Left Adj. Lane Sat. N Width Veh Grade Pkg. Block Type Turn Turn Sat. App Group Flow Lanes f f f f f f f f Flow --- ----- ---- --- w ----- ---- HV g ----- p bb ---- ---- a ---- RT ---- LT ---- vphg -- WB L 1900 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 1.00 .950 1624 R 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 .850 1.00 1424 NB TR 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.00 1.00 .900 .997 1.00 3342 S Lper Lpro 1900 1 T 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.000 .980 1.000 1.00 1.00 .108 181 .900 1.00 .950 1592 .900 1.00 1.00 3352 98-- 786 SIG/Cinema V1.0 ORGANIZATION: B & A PARTNERS, INC. Committed + Project Traffic SE 14TH TERR/BRICKELL AVE Page-4 **************************************************************************** WORKSHEET FOR PERMITTED LEFT TURNS OPPOSED BY A MULTI -LANE APPROACH Cycle Length C, (sec) Actual Green, G Effective Green, g (sec) Opposing Effective Green, go Number of Lanes, N Opposing Lanes, No Adjusted Left -Turn Flow Rate, vLT Proportion of LT, PLT Opposing Flow Rate, vo (vph) Lost Time Per Phase, tL Left Turns per Cycle, LTC=vLT*C/3600 Opp Flow (/Ln/Cycle), vole=vo*C/(3600*No) Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo gf=G**(-0.860*LTC**.629)-tL, gf<=g Opp. Queue Ratio, qro=1-Rpo*(go/C) gq gu=g-gq (if gq<=gf then gu=g-gf) fs=(875-.625*vo)/1000, fs>=0 PL=PLT [1+((N-1) *g/ (fs*gu+4.5) )] EL1 fmin=2 * (1+PL) /g fm=[gf/g]+[gu/g] [1/(1+PL(EL1-1) )] fLT = [fm + .91 * (N-1) ] / N FR UP rTu en 115 90.0 67.0 65.0 1 2 344 1.00 895 0.0 10.99 14.30 1.00 0.00 0.43 16.54 50.46 0.32 1.00 6.99 0.06 0.11 0.11 98- 786 SIG/Cinema V1.0 ORGANIZATION: B & A PARTNERS, INC. Committed + Project Traffic SE 14TH TERR/BRICKELL AVE Page-5 **************************************************************************** SUPPLEMENTARY UNIFORM DELAY WORKSHEET EB WB NB SB Adjusted LT volume, v 344 v/c ratio, X 0.74 Primary phase effective green, g 26.00 Secondary green interval, gq 16.54 Secondary green interval, gu 50.46 Red Time, r 22.00 Arrivals: qa=v/(3600(max(X,1))) 0.10 Primary phase departures, sp=s/3600 0.44 Secondary departures,ss=s(gq+gu)/(gu*3600) 0.07 Xperm 1.90 Xprot 0.40 Case 3 Queue at beginning of green arrow, Qa 5.14 Queue at beginning of unsaturated green,Qu 1.58 Residual queue, Qr 3.03 Uniform delay, dl 17.80 9 8 - 786 SIG/Cinema V1.0 ORGANIZATION: B & A P.�--,rNERS, INC. Committed + Project Traffic SE 14TH TERR/BRICKELL AVE Page-6 **************************************************************************** CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEET ----------------------- - -------------- v s v/s g/C c X Lane Adj Flow Adj Sat Flow Green Capacity v/c App. Group (vph) (vphg) Ratio Ratio (vph) Ratio ---- ----- ----- ------ ----- ------------------------------- WB * L 24 1624 0.01 0.16 R 428 1424 0.30 0.38 NB TR 895 3342 0.27 0.57 SB Lper 0 181 Lpro 344 1592 * T 2438 3352 * Critical Lane Group Sum(v/s) crit = 0.74 Cycle Length, C = 115 Sec 254 545 1889 0..09 0.79 0.47 0.00 0.58 105 0.00 0.22 0.23 360 465# 0.96 0.74# 0.73 0.81 2711 0.90.. # Left Movement Total Xc = 0.77 Lost Time Per Cycle, L = 4.0 Sec LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEET ----- Delay 1 ------ --- Delay 2 --- -Ln Grp - -- App -- X g/C di DF c m d2 Delay Delay Lane v/c Green (sec Adj. Cap Calib (sec (sec (sec App Grp. Ratio Ratio /veh) Fact (vph) Param /veh) /veh) LOS /veh) LOS --- ---- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- --- ----- --- WB L 0.09 0.16 31.6 0.85 254 16.0 0.0 R 0.79 0.38 23.8 0.85 545 16.0 5.2 NB TR 0.47 0.57 11.3 1.00 1889 16.0 0.1 SB L 0.74 0.81 17.8 1.00 465 16.0 4.3 T 0.90 0.81 5.9 1.00 2711 16.0 3.3 Cycle = 115 Sec 26.8 D 25.5 D 25.4 D 11.4 B 11.4 B 22.1 C 10.8 B 9.2 B Intersection 12.5 B • HCS: Signalized Int 'section Version 2.4e 05-07-1998 1 Jackson M. Ahlstedt, P.E. 46 N.W. 94 St. Miami Shores, FL 331505 (305) 754-8695 Streets: (N-S) BRICKELLrAVENUE (E-W) SE 14TH TERR Analyst: J. AHLSTEDT File Name: 14TH_TER.HC9 Area Type: CBD 5-7-98 PM PEAK Comment: YR 2000 BG+COMM+PROJ OPT ------------ No. Lanes Volumes PHF or PK15 Lane W ( f t ) Grade• % Heavy Veh Parking Bus Stops Con. Peds Ped Button Arr Type RTOR Vols Lost Time ------------ Traf f is --------------- Northbound L T R 0 2 < 0 750 17 0.90 0.90 12.0 0 2 1 N N 0 50 (YIN) N 3 0 2.00 2.00 --------------- and Roadway Cc --------------- Southbound L T R 1 2 0 310 2090 0.90 0.90 12.0 12.0 0 2 2 N N 0 50 (YIN) N 3 3 120 2.00 --------------- 2.00 nditions --------------- Eastbound L T R 0 0 0 0 --------------- Signal Operations -------------- Westbound L T R 1 0 1 22 436 0.90 0.90 12.0 12.0 0 0 2 N N 0 20 (YIN) N 3 3 50 2.00 2.00 --------------- Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NB Left EB Left Thru * Thru Right * Right Peds Peds SB Left Thru Right Peds EB Right WB Right Green 24.OA 62.OP Yellow/AR 4.0 5.0 WB Left Thru Right Peds NB Right SB Right Green 15.OA Yellow/AR 5.0 Cycle Length: 115 secs Phase combination order: #1 #2 #5 8 HCS: Signalized Into aection Version 2.4e 05-07-1998 2 Streets: (N-S) BRICKELL AVENUE (E-W) SE 14TH TERR Analyst: J. AHLSTEDT File Name: 14TH-TER.HC9 Area Type: CBD 5-7-98 PM PEAK Comment: YR 2000 BG+COMM+PROJ OPT Volume Adjustment Worksheet Direc- Lane Lane Adj tion/ Mvt Adj Lane Grp No. Util Growth Grp Prop Prop Mvt ----- Vol ---- PHF ---- Vol ---- Grp ---- Vol ---- Ln -- Fact ----- Fact Vol LT RT NB ------ ---- ---- ---- Thru 750 0.90 833 TR 852 2 1.050 1.000 895 0.00 0.02 Right 17 0.90 19 SB Left 310 0.90 344 L 344 1 1.000 1.000 344 1.00 0.00 Thru 2090 .0.90 2322 T 2322 2 1.050 1.000 2438 0.00 0.00 WB Left 22 0.90 24 L 24 1 1.000 1.000 24 1.00 0.00 Right ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 436 0.90 428 R 428 1 1.000 1.000 428 0.00 1.00 Saturation Flow Adjustment Worksheet Ideal Adj Direction Sat No. f f f f f f f f Sat /LnGrp ------ Flow ---- Lns --- W ----- HV ----- G ----- p ----- BB A RT LT Flow NB ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- TR 1900 2 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 3342 SB 0.11 181 L. 1900 1 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 1.00 0.95 1593 T 1900 2 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 3353 WB L 1900 1 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 1.00 0.95 1624 R 1900 1 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 0.85 1.00 1425 98- 786 HCS: Signalized In' -section Version 2.4e 05-07-1998 3 Streets: ^(N-S) BRICKELL AVENUE (E-W) SE 14TH TERR Analyst: J. AHLSTEDT File Name: 14TH_TER.HC9 Area Type: CBD 5-7-98 PM PEAK Comment: YR 2000 BG+COMM+PROD OPT Supplemental Permitted LT Worksheet APPROACH SB Cycle Length, C 115 Actual Green Time for Lane Group, G 90 Effective Green Time for Lane Group, g 67 Opposing Effective Green Time, go 65 Number of Opposing Lanes, No 2 Number of Lanes in Lane Group, N 1 Adjusted Left -Turn Flow Rate, Vlt 344 Proportion of Left Turns in Lane Group, Plt 1.00 Left Turns per Cycle: LTC=Vlt*C/3600 10.99 Adjusted Opposing Flow Rate, Vo 895 Opposing Flow per Lane, Per Cycle: Volc=VoC/3600No 14.30 Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo 1 Lost time per phase, tl 0 gf=Gexp(-0.882*LTC^0.717)-tl 0.00 Opposing Queue Ratio: qro=1-Rpo(go/C) 0.43 gq = Volc * qro / (.5 - Volc * (1 - qro) / go)-tl 16.54 gu=g-gq (or g-gf) 50.46 fs=(875-0.625Vo)/1000 0.32 P1=Plt[l+((N-1)g/(fs*gu+4.5))] 1.00 Ell 6.99 fmin 0.06 fm,(min=fmin;max=1.00) 0.11 flt=[fm+0.91(N-1)]/N 0.11 98- 786 HCS: Signalized Ini section Version 2.4e 05-07-1998 4 Streets:!(N-S) BRICKELL AVENUE (E-W) SE 14TH TERR Analyst: J. AHLSTEDT File Name: 14TH_TER.HC9 Area Type: CBD 5-7-98 PM PEAK Comment: YR 2000 BG+COMM+PROJ OPT Capacity Analysis Worksheet Adj Adj Sat Flow Lane Group Direction Flow Rate Flow Rate Ratio Green Ratio Capacity v/c /LnGrp --------- (v) --------- (s) --------- (v/s) ----- (g/C) --------------------- (c) Ratio ----- NB TR 895 3342 0.268 0.565 1889 0.474 SB Lsec. 0 181 0.000 0.583 105 0.000 Lpri. 344 1593 0.216 0.226 360 0.000 Ltot. 344 466 0.738 T 2438 3353 0.727 0.8109 2712 0.899 * EB WB L 24 1624 0.015 0.157 254 0.094 R 428 1425 0.300 0.157 223 1.919 * Sum (v/s) critical = 1.027 Lost Time/Cycle, ----------------------------------------------------------------------- L = 4.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 1.064 Level of Service Worksheet ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Delay Del Lane Calib Delay Lane Lane Delay LOS Direction v/c g/C d Adj Group d d Grp Grp By By /LnGrp Ratio Ratio 1 Fact Cap 2 2 Del LOS App App --------- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ---- ----- --- NB TR 0.474 0.565 11.3 0.850 1889 16 0.1 9.7 B 9.7 B SB L 0.738 0.809 17.8 0.850 466 16 4.2 19.3 C 9.6 B T 0.899 0.809 5.9 0.850 2712 16 3.3 8.3 B EB WB L 0.094 0.157 31.6 0.850 254 16 0.0 26.8 D R 1.919 0.157 * 0.850 223 16 Intersection Delay = * (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = * Delay and LOS not meaningful when any v/c is greater than 1.2 or 1/PHF ----------------------- -------------------- ------------- ---------------- 98- 786 HCS: Signalized In' -section Version 2.4e 05-07-1998 5 Streets: (N-S) BRICKELL AVENUE (E-W) SE 14TH TERR Analyst: J. AHLSTEDT File Name: 14TH_TER.HC9 Area Type: CBD 5-7-98 PM PEAK Comment: YR 2000 BG+COMM+PROJ OPT Supplemental Uniform Delay Worksheet Approach Adj. LT Vol (v) v/c ratio (x) Primary phase effective green gq from Supplemental LT Worksheet gu from Supplemental LT Worksheet Red time (r) Arrivals qa = v/(3600(max(x,l))) Primary Ph. Departures Sp=s/3600 Secondary Ph. Departures Ss=S(Gq+Gu)/(Gu*3600). Xperm Xprot Case Queue at begining of green arrow (Qa) Queue at beginning of unsaturated green (Qu) Residual queue (Qr) Uniform Delay Southbound 344 0.74 26.00 16.54 50.46 22.00 0.10 0.44 0.07 1.90 0.40 3 5.14 1.58 3.03 17.80 98- 786 NETSIM Summary L Case: 14TH_TER Committed + Project Traffic Queues Spillback in Per Lane Avg Worst Lane Lane Storage Speed N of Peak App Group (veh) (mph) Period) SE 14TN iERR/BRICHELL AVE PM Peak Year 2880 Version 1.8 2090 I I I i 436 I I I titl i 22 WB L 1/ 2 10.3 8.0 I tI R 5i 7 13.9 0.0 t II l l A11 13.6 8.8 I I I I NB TR 7/ 6 13.2 0.0 I I A11 13.2 0.0 I I t 17 I I 750 SB L 6i 8 4.8 0.0 1 IL L 2 111. 3 t—. T 9i 11 2.6 0.0 24 4 62 1F4 1 15 4 1 All 16.9 6.0 Intersect. 15.5 98- 786 NETSIM Results for Case: 14TH TER SE 14TH TERR/BRICI(ELL AVE Committed + Project Traffic PM Peak i Year 2000 Version 1.0 HETSIM Queue Statistics *Average *Max. *Max. Pet. Pct. Of Pct. Of Cycles Animation Max. Q Queue Of Time Cycles Where Turner Frame Per Cycle Per That Q With Can't Enter Bay Showing Ln Per Lane Lane Overflows Turn Bay Due To Queue Longest App Grp (vehs) (vehs) A Lane Overflow Of Non —Turners Queue WE L 1 2 0.8 5:57 A 5 7 0.0 0:16 HB TR 7 8 0.8 3:03 SB L 6 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 0:43 T 9 11 0.8 0:45 *These performance measures are also shown on summary statistics screen 98-~ 786 NETSIM Results . Case: 14TH-TER SE 141n TERR/BRIC1ELL AVE Committed + Project Traffic PM Peak i Year 2800 Version 1.8 NETSIM Environmental Statistics Fuel Consumption -- ----Gallons--- -- ---Miles Per Gallon-- --- Autos Trucks Buses Autos Trucks Buses EB 8.0 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.0 0.0 WB 8.9 8.1 0.8 16.2 9.9 0.0 NB 1.6 0.1 0.0 14.6 9.4 0.0 SB 5.3 0.2 0.8 14.3 6.1 8.0 All 7.8 8.3 0.0 14.6. 7.5 0.0 Auto Pollutant Emissions RTOR (Grams/Mile-Hour) Maneuvers --HC-- ---CO--- HOX--- Completed EB 8.0 0.8 0.0 0 WB 72.3 1122.8 155.4 54 NB 142.4 2913.9 352.6 0 SB 478.5 12724.0 1495.1 0 All 231.1 5586.9 667.7 98-- "7S6 im • INPUT FILE NAME: H:\BA\Brkl termrk\14T.TRF '1y • RUN DATE 5/ 7/98 TTTTTTTTTTT RRRRRRRRR AAAAAAA FFFFFFFFFFF TTTTTTTTTTT RRRRRRRRRR AAAAAAAAA FFFFFFFFFFF TTTTTTTTTTT RRRRRRRRRRR AAAAAAAAAAA FFFFFFFFFFF TTT RRR RRR AAA AAA FFF TTT RRR RRR AAA AAA FFF TTT RRRRRRRRRRR AAAAAAAAAAA FFFFFFF TTT RRRRRRRRRR AAAAAAAAAAA FFFFFFF TTT RRR RRR AAA AAA FFF TTT RRR RRR AAA AAA FFF TTT RRR RRR AAA AAA FFF TTT RRR RRR AAA AAA FFF TTT RRR RRR AAA AAA FFF VERSION 1.04 RELEASE DATE FEB 98 1 TRAF SIMULATION MODEL DEVELOPED FOR ' U. S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION TFIIRC INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS 6 TECHNOLOGIES DIVISION V r 1 I CARD FILE LIST OSEQ.1 :----+----1----+----2----+----3----+----4----+----5----+----6----+----7----+----8 1 :ITRAF 2.0 00 2 :J. M. AHLSTEDT 5 1 98 1 1 3 1 0 15 0000 317 7781 7581 2 4 900 3 5 60 4 6 5 7 2 11120 2• 7T 3 4 20 22 30 11 11 8 1 21120 100 2 1 7T 10 9 8 9 20 22 30 11 11 9 1 3 850 100 2 1 7T 7 6 5 6 20 22 30 11 11 10 3 1 050 175 2 1 TT 4 2 2 20 22 30 11 11 11 4 1 500 2 41 2 3 20 22 30 11 12 1 4 500 2 8002 0002 20 22 30 11 13 :8002 4 2 TT 1 20 22 0 11 11 14 3 5 500 2 TT 8004 20 22 30 11 11 15 5 3 500 100 2 1 4T 1 7 6 7 20 22 30 11 11 16 7 3 500 100 2 1 48 6 5 1 5 20 22 30 11 11 17 7 500 2 TT 8005 20 22 30 11 11 18 :3 6 650 2 8003 20 22 30 11 19 6 3 650 100 100 2 1 1 TT 5 1 7 1 20 22 30 11 11 20 :8003 6 2 TT 3 20 22 0 11 11 21 :8005 7 2 TT 3 20 22 0 11 11 22 :8004 5 2 TT 3 20 22 0 11 11 23 2 10 500 2 8007 20 22 30 11 24 10 2 500 2 78 9 8 1 8 20 22 30 11 11 25 9 2 880 100 2 1 7T 8 1 10 1 20 22 30 11 11 26 2 9 880 2 8001 20 22 30 11 27 2 8 500 2 8006 20 22 30 11 28 8 2 500 2 78 1 10 9 10 20 22 30 11 11 29 :.8006 8 2 TT 2 20 22 0 11 11 30 :8001 9 2 TT 2 20 22 0 11 11 31 :8007 10 2 TT 2 20 22 0 11 11 32 2 1 833 18 21 33 1 2 492265 59 21 34 1 3 402 774 50 21 35 3 1 3342322 21 36 4 1 24 484 21 37 1 4 100 21 38 :8002 4 100 21 39 3 5 100 21 40 5 3 107 345 35 21 41 7 3 118 151 203 21 .� 42 3 7 100 21 21 43 3 6 100 44 6 3 271585 314 21 ' 45 :0003 6 100 21 46 :8005 7 100 21 47 :8004 5 100 21 48 2 10 100 21 49 10 2 16 54 42 21 50 9 2 571149 60 21 OSEQ.1 :----+----1----+----2----+----3----+----4----+----5----+----6----+----7----+----8 I CARD FILE LIST (CONT.) OSEQ.1 :----+----1----+----2----+----3----+----4----+----5----+----6----+----7----+----8 51 2 9 100 21 52 2 8 100 21 53 8 2 26 54 56 21 54 :8006 8 100 21 55 :0001 9 100 21 56 :8007 10 100 21 57 4 18002 35 58 5 38004 35 59 6 38003 • 35 60 7 38005 35 61 a 28006 35 62 9 20001 35 63 10 26007 35 64 4 11 36 65 5 11 36 66 6 11 36 67 7 11 36 68 8 11 36 69 9 11 36 70 10 11 36 71 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 1 43 72 2 1 2 10 2 9 2 8 2 1 43 73 3 1 3 5 3 7 3 6 3 1 43 74 1 21122 11222 22222 45 75 1 2 22222 11222 22222 45 76 1 3 22222 22222 12122 45 77 2 1 11122 22222 11122 22222 45 76 2 2 22222 11122 22222 11122 45 79 : 3 1 11122 22222 22222 11122 45 80 3 2 11122 22222 22222 12222 45 81 3 3 22222 22222 11122 22222 45 82 3 4 22222 11122 22222 22222 45 83 1 1 1 39 0 0 0250 0 46 84 1 2 1 27 0 0 0250 0 46 85 2 2 1 49 0 0 0250 0 46 86 3 2 1 11 0 0 0250 0 46 87 3 2 1 47 0 0 0250 0 46 88 3 3 1 39 0 0 0250 0 46 89 3 4 1 29 0 0 0250 0 46 90 1 1 1020 52 20 62 200 200 40 100000 1 10000 0 0 0 47 91 1 2 1020 14 20 24 200 200 40 010000000000 0 0 0 47 92 1 3 1020 5 20 15 200 200 40 100000 1 00000 0 0 0 47 93 2 1 720 91 20 98 200 200 40 100000 1 00000 0 0 0 47 94 2 2 720 20 7 200 200 40 10000000010000 0 0 0 47 95 3 1 1020 40 20 50 200 200 30 100000 1 10000 0 0 0 47 96 3 2 1020 18 20 28 200 200 30 010000000000 0 0 0 47 97 3 3 1020 20 10 200 200 30 10000000000000 0 0 0 47 96 3 4 1020 2 20 12 200 200 30 10000000010000 0 0 0 47 (} 99 :8002 4 508 50 50 100 OSEQ.1 :8003 61926 :----+----1----+----2----+----3----+----4----+----5----+----6----+----7----+----8 3 I CARD FILE LIST (CONT.) OSEQ.1 :----+----1----+----2----+----3----+----4----+----5----+----6----+----7----+----8 101 :8005 7 472 50 102 :8004 5 487 50 103 :8006 8 136 50 104 :8001 91266 50 105 :8007 10 112 50 106 0 170 107 1 10000 10000 195 100 2 10000 8880 195 109 3 10000 10850 195 110 4 10500 10000 195 111 :8001 10000 7500 195 112 :8002 11000 10000 195 113 :8003 10000 12000 195 114 :8004 11000 10850 195 115 :8005 9000 10850 195 116 :8006 9000 8880 195 117 :8007 11000 0080 195 118 5 10500 10850 195 119 6 10000 11500' 195 120 7 9500 10850 195 121 8 9500 8880 195 122 9 10000 8000 195 123 10 10500 8880 195 124 1 210 OSEQ.1 :----+----1----+----2----+----3----+----4----+----5----+----6----+----7----+----8 I 1 .r I 0 ITRAF 2.0 0 0 0 1 TRAF SIMULATION MODEL DEVELOPED FOR U. S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION TFHRC INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS 6 TECHNOLOGIES DIVISION DATE = 5/ 1/ 98 USER = J. M. AHLSTEDT AGENCY = RUN CONTROL DATA VALUE RUN PARAMETERS AND OPTIONS 0 1 RUN IDENTIFICATION NUMBER Random number seed, entry 4 on Record Type 02, is less than or equal to zero. Setting this random seed to 7981. 1 RUN TYPE CODE _ ( 1, 2, 3) TO RUN (SIMULATION, ASSIGNMENT, BOTH) (-1,-2,-3) TO CHECK (SIMULATION, ASSIGNMENT, BOTH) ONLY 0 NETSIM ENVIRONMENTAL OPTIONS 0 ---------------------------- FUEL/EMISSION RATE TABLES ARE NOT PRINTED 0 SIMULATION: PERFORMED ENVIRONMENTAL MEASURES: CALCULATED RATE TABLES: EMBEDDED TRAJECTORY FILE: NOT WRITTEN 0 0 CODE - (0,1,2) FOR UNIFORM DISTRIBUTION, NORMAL DISTRIBUTION, ERLANG DISTRIBUTION 0 0 INPUT UNITS CODE = (0,1) IF INPUT IS IN (ENGLISH, METRIC) UNITS 0 OUTPUT UNITS CODE = (0,1,2,3) IF OUTPUT IS IN (SAME AS INPUT, ENGLISH, METRIC, BOTH) UNITS 0 1700 CLOCK TIME AT START OF SIMULATION (IIHMM) 0 0 SIGNAL TRANSITION CODE _ (0,1,2,3) IF(NO, IMMEDIATE, 2-CYCLE, 3-CYCLE) TRANSITION WAS REQUESTED 0 7581 RANDOM NUMBER SEED 7781 RANDOM NUMBER SEED TO GENERATE TRAFFIC STREAM FOR NETSIM OR LEVEL I SIMULATION 7981 RANDOM NUMBER SEED TO GENERATE EMISSION HEADWAYS FOR NETSIM SIMULATION 900 DURATION (SEC) OF TIME PERIOD NO. 1 0 60 LENGTH OF A TIME INTERVAL, SECONDS 0 15 MAXIMUM INITIALIZATION TIME, NUMBER OF TIME INTERVALS 0 0 NUMBER OF TIME INTERVALS BETWEEN SUCCESSIVE STANDARD OUTPUTS 0 0 TIME INTERMEDIATE OUTPUT WILL BEGIN AT INTERVALS OF 0 SECS. FOR 0 SECS. FOR MICROSCOPIC MODELS 0 0 NETSIM MOVEMENT -SPECIFIC OUTPUT CODE _ (0,1) (IF NOT, IF) REQUESTED FOR NETSIM SUBNETWORK coo 0 NETSIM GRAPHICS OUTPUT CODE = (0,1) IF GRAPHICS OUTPUT (IS NOT, IS) REQUESTED 04 0 5 TIME PERIOD 1 - NETSIM DATA 1 NETSIM LINKS 0 -LANES- -CHANNEL- F C U U LOST Q DIS FREE LANE LENGTH L PKT GRD LINK R DESTINATION NODE OPP. TIME HDWY. SPEED RTOR PED ALIGN LINK FT / M L L R PCT TYPE B234567 LEFT THRU RGHT DIAG NODE SEC SEC MPH/KMPH CODE CODE -MENT ( 2, 1) 1120/ 341 2 0 0 0 1* 7T00000 0 3 4 0 0 2.0 2.2 30/ 48 0 0 1-1 ( 11 2) 1120/ 341 2 1 0 0 1* 7T00000 10 9 8 0 9 2.0 2.2 30/ 48 0 0 1-1 ( 11 3) 850/ 259 2 1 0 0 1* 7T00000 7 6 5 0 6 2.0 2.2 30/ 48 0 0 1-1 ( 3, 1) 850/ 259 2 1 0 0 1* 'TT00000 4 2 0 0 2 2.0 2.2 30/ 48 0 0 1-1 ( 4, 1) 500/ 152 2 0 0 0 1* 4100000 2 0 3 0 0 2.0 2.2 30/ 48 0 0 1-1* ( 1, 4) 500/ 152 2 0 0 0 1* 0000000 0 6002 0 0 8002 2.0 2.2 30/ 48 0 0 1-1* (8002, 4) 0/ 0 2 0 0 0 1* TT00000 0 1 0 0 0 2.0 2.2 0/ 0 0 0 1-1 ( 3, 5) 500/ 152 2 0 0 0 1* TTOOOOO 0 0004 0 0 0 2.0 2.2 30/ 40 0 0 1-1 ( 51 3) 500/ 152 2 1 0 0 1* 4T00000 1 7 6 0 7 2.0 2.2 30/ 48 0 0 1-1 ( 7, 3) 500/ 152 2 1 0 0 1* 4800000 6 5 1 0 5 2.0 2.2 30/ 48 0 0 1-1 ( 3, 7) 500/ 152 2 0 0 0 1* TT00000 0 8005 0 0 0 2.0 2.2 30/ 48 0 0 1-1 ( 3, 6) 650/ 196 2 0 0 0 1* 0000000 0 8003 0 0 0 2.0 2.2 30/ 48 0 0 1-1* ( 6, 3) 650/ 198 2 1 1 0 1* TT00000 5 1 7 0 1 2.0 2.2 30/ 48 0 0 1-1 (8003, 6) 0/ 0 2 0 0 0 1* TT00000 0 3 0 0 0 2.0 2.2 0/ 0 0 0 1-1 (0005, 7) 0/ 0 2 0 0 0 1* TT00000 0 3 0 0 0 2.0 2.2 0/ 0 0 0 1-1 (8004, 5) 0/ 0 2 0 0 0 1* TTOOOOO 0 3 0 0 0 2.0 2.2 0/ 0 0 0 1-1 ( 2, 10) 500/ 152 2 0 0 0 1* 0000000 0 8007 0 0 0 2.0 2.2 30/ 48 0 0 1-1* ( 10, 2) 500/ 152 2 0 0 0 1* 7800000 9 8 1 0 0 2.0 2.2 30/ 48 0 0 1-1 ( 91 2) 880/ 268 2 1 0 0 1* 7T00000 8 1 10 0 1 2.0 2.2 30/ 40 0 0 1-1 ( 2, 9) 880/ 268 2 0 0 0 1* 0000000 0 0001 0 0 0 2.0 2.2 30/ 48 0 0 1-1* ( 2, 8) 500/ 152 2 0 0 0 1* 0000000 0 8006 0 0 0 2.0 2.2 30/ 40 0 0 1-1* ( 8, 2) 500/ 152 2 0 0 0 1* 7800000 1 10 9 0 10 2.0 2.2 30/ 46 0 0 '0 1-1 (8006, 8) 0/ 0 2 0 0 0 1* TT00000 0 2 0 0 0 2.0 2.2 0/ 0 0 1-1 (8001, 9) 0/ 0 2 0 0 0 1* TT00000 0 2 0 0 0 2.0 2.2 0/ 0 0 0 1-1 (8007, 10) 0/ 0 2 0 0 0 1* TT00000 0 2 0 0 0 2.0 2.2 0/ 0 0 0 1-1 * INDICATES DEFAULT VALUES WERE SPECIFIED LINK TYPE LANE CHANNELIZATION RTOR PEDESTRIAN CODES CODES CODES IDENTIFIES THE 0 UNRESTRICTED 0 RTOR PERMITTED 0 NO PEDESTRIANS DISTRIBUTION USED FOR 1 LEFT TURNS ONLY 1 RTOR PROHIBITED 1 LIGHT 2 MODERATE QUEUE DISCHARGE AND 2 BUSES ONLY START-UP LOST TIME 3 CLOSED 3 HEAVY CHARACTERISTICS. 4 RIGHT TURNS ONLY STREET NAME 6 5 CAR - POOLS 6 CAR - POOLS + BUSES 7 RIGHT TURNS + RIGHT DIAGONAL AND/OR THROUGH 8 LEFT TURNS + LEFT DIAGONAL AND/OR THROUGH 9 ALL PERMITTED MOVEMENTS WITH RESPECT TO THE GEOMETRY AND ADJACENT LANE CHANNELIZATIONS D DIAGONAL TRAFFIC ONLY T THROUGH TRAFFIC ONLY TOTAL LINKS: 25 (ALLOWED: 500) TOTAL NON -ENTRY NODES: 10 (ALLOWED: 250) 10 1 NETSIM TURNING MOVEMENT DATA TURN MOVEMENT PERCENTAGES TURN MOVEMENT POSSIBLE LINK LEFT THROUGH RIGHT DIAGONAL LEFT THROUGH RIGHT DIAGONAL ( 2, 1► 0 98 2 0 NO YES YES NO ( 11 2) 2 96 2 0 YES YES YES NO ( 1, 3) 37 59 4 0 YES YES YES NO ( 3, 1) 13 87 0 0 YES YES NO NO ( 4, 1) 5 0 95 0 YES NO YES NO ( 1, 4) 0 100 0 0 NO YES NO NO (8002, 4) 0 100 0 0 NO YES NO NO ( 3, 5) 0 100 0 0 NO YES NO NO ( 51 3) 22 71 1 0 YES YES YES NO ( 7, 3) 25 32 43 0 YES YES YES NO ( 3, 7) 0 100 0 0 NO YES NO NO ( 3, 6) 0 100. 0 0 NO YES NO NO ( 6, 3) 1 83 16 0 YES YES YES NO (8003, 6) 0 100 0 0 NO YES NO NO (0005, 7) 0 100 0 '0 NO YES NO NO (8004, 5) 0 100 0 0 NO YES NO NO ( 2, 10) 0 100 0 0 NO YES NO NO ( 10, 2) 14 48 38 0 YES YES YES NO ( 9, 2) 5 90 5 0 YES YES YES NO ( 2, 9) 0 100 0 0 NO YES NO NO ( 2, 8) 0 100 0 0 NO YES NO NO ( 81 2) 19 40 41 0 YES YES YES NO (8006, 8) 0 100 0 0 NO YES NO NO (8001, 9) 0 100 0 0 NO YES NO NO (8007, 10) 0 100 0 0 NO YES NO NO POCKET LENGTH (IN FEET/METERS) LEFT RIGHT 0/ 0 0/ 0 100/ 30 0/ 0 100/ 30 0/ 0 175/ 53 0/ 0 O/ 0 0/ 0 0/ 0 0/ 0 0/ 0 0/ 0 0/ 0 0/ 0 100/ 30 0/ 0 100/ 30 0/ 0 O/ 0 0/ 0 O/ 0 0/ 0 100/ 30 100/ 30 O/ 0 0/ 0 0/ 0 0/ 0 0/ 0 0/ 0 0/ 0 0/ 0 0/ 0 0/ 0 100/ 30 0/ 0 0/ 0 0/ 0 0/ 0 0/. 0 0/ 0 0/ 0 0/ 0 0/ 0 0/ 0 0/ 0 0/ 0 0/ 0 B 1 SPECIFIED FIXED -TIME SIGNAL CONTROL, AND SIGN CONTROL, CODES 0 NODE 4 IS UNDER SIGN CO14TROL 0 INTERVAL DURATION +- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - APPROACHES - - - - - - - - - - NUMBER (SEC) (PCT) ( 11 4) (8002, 4) 1 0 100 1 1 0 NODE 5 IS UNDER SIGN CONTROL 0 INTERVAL DURATION +- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - APPROACHES - - - - - - - - - - - NUMBER (SEC) (PCT) ( 3, 5) (8004, 5) 1 0 100 1 1 0 NODE 6 IS UNDER SIGN CONTROL 0 INTERVAL DURATION +- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - APPROACHES - - - - - - - - - - - NUMBER (SEC) (PCT) ( 3, 6) (8003, 6) 1 0 100 1 1 0 NODE 7 IS UNDER SIG14 CONTROL 0 INTERVAL DURATION +- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - APPROACHES - - - - - - - - - - - NUMBER (SEC) (PCT) ( 3, 7) (8005, 7) 1 0 100 1 1 0 NODE 8 IS UNDER SIGN CONTROL 0 INTERVAL DURATION +- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - APPROACHES - - - - - - - - - - -- + NUMBER (SEC) (PCT) ( 2, 8) (8006, 8) 1 0 100 1 1 0 NODE 9 IS UNDER SIGN CONTROL 0 INTERVAL DURATION' +- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -APPROACHES - - - - - - - - - - - - -- + NUMBER (SEC) (PCT) ( 2, 9) (8001, 9) 1 0 100 1 1 0 NODE 10 IS'UNDER SIGN CONTROL + 0 INTERVAL DURATION +- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - APPROACHES - - - - - - - - - - - NUMBER (SEC) (PCT) ( 2, 10) (8007, 10) 1 0 100 1 1 1 INTERPRETATION OF SIGNAL CODES 0 YIELD OR AMBER 1 GREEN 2 RED , 3 RED WITH GREEN RIGHT ARROW 4 RED WITH GREEN LEFT ARROW 5 STOP 6 RED WITH GREEN DIAGONAL ARROW 7 NO TURNS -GREEN THRU ARROW 8 RED WITH LEFT AND RIGHT GREEN ARROW 9 NO LEFT TURN -GREEN THRU AND RIGHT -11 9 1 TRAFFIC CONTROL TABLE - SIGNS AND FIXED TIME SIGNALS CONTROL CODES GO = PROTECTED NOGO - NOT PERMITTED AMBR = AMBER PERM = PERMITTED NOT PROTECTED PROT = PROTECTED STOP = STOP SIGN YLD = YIELD SIGN NODE 4 SIGN CONTROL INTERVAL DURATION ------------------------------------------- APPROACHES -------------------------------------------- ( 1, 4) (8002, 4) LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG 1 0 GO GO NODE 5 SIGN CONTROL INTERVALDURATION ------------------------------------------- APPROACHES -------------------------------------------- ( 3, 5) (8004, 5) LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG 1 0 GO GO NODE 6 SIGN CONTROL INTERVALDURATION ------------------------------------------- APPROACHES -------------------------------------------- ( 3, 6) (8003, 6) LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG 1 0 GO GO NODE 7 SIGN CONTROL INTERVALDURATION ------------------------------------------- APPROACHES -------------------------------------------- ( 3, 7) (8005, 7) LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT TIIRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG 1 0 GO GO ' NODE a SIGN CONTROL INTERVALDURATION ------------------------------------------- APPROACHES -------------------------------------------- ,� ( 2, 8) (8006, 8) LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG 1 0 GO GO 10 I NODE 9 SIGN CONTROL INTERVALDURATION ------------------------------------------- APPROACHES -------------------------------------------- 1 2, 9) (6001, 9) LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG 1 0 GO GO NODE 10 SIGN CONTROL INTERVAL DURATION ------------------------------------------- APPROACHES -------------------------------------------- ( 2, 10) (8007, 10) LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG 1 0 GO GO 11 1 TRAFFIC CONTROL TABLES — ACTUATED SIGNALS #t*tttttrt+++++++++#+++rt#rrratti+rrr * NODE 1 CONTROL SPECIFICATIONS ALLOWABLE MOVEMENT DATA PHASE-------------------------------------------- APPROACHES -------------------------------------------- ( 2, 1) ( 3, 1) 1 4, 1) LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG 1 NOGO GO GO NOGO GO GO NOGO NOGO NOGO NOGG NOGO NOGO 2 NOGO NOGO NOGO NOGO GO GO NOGO NOGO NOGO NOGO NOGO NOGO 3 NOGO NOGO NOGO NOGO NOGO NOGG NOGO NOGO GO NOGO GO NOGO ##**##}*}t*++***tt**t*t**i+++t***ta#*****tt**t*** * NODE 1 CONTROL SPECIFICATIONS (CONTINUED) DETECTOR DATA DISTANCE OF COVERED TRAILING EDGE TYPE III APPROACH LANES FROM NODE 1 DETECTOR LENGTH DELAY TIME CARRY—OVER LIMIT TIME ' --------- DETECTOR --------- PHASE LINK A B FEET / METERS FEET / METERS (SEC) TIME (SEC) (SEC) TYPE FUNCTION 1 ( 4, 1) 9 — 0 .0 .0 25.0 7.6 .0 .0 PRESENCE EXTENSION — CALL 2 ( 3, 1) 7 — 0 .0 .0 25.0 7.6 .0 .0 PRESENCE EXTENSION — CALL 12 1 tt+++++++t+rtt+tatttttttrt+rrrr++t+a++r+t+++t+t+r * NODE 1 CONTROL SPECIFICATIONS (CONTINUED) +tttar++ta+t+ta++++a++tt+tt+++rtta+a++++r+t+rt++t VEHICULAR PHASES DATA -------------------- INITIAL INTERVAL ------------------- -- INTERVAL TIMINGS (SEC) -- ADDED TIME I OF I OF MAX MAX UNIT RED PER VEHICLE MAX ACTUATIONS ACTUATIONS MIN YELLOW RED EXTENSION GREEN EXTENSION REVERT TYPE ACTUATION INITIAL TO REACH SERVED DURING PHASE GREEN CHANGE CLEARANCE (SEC) (SEC) (SEC) (SEC) CODE (SEC) (SEC) MAX INITIAL MIN INITIAL 1 10 4 1.0 52 2.0 .0 0 2.0 62 2 10 4 .0 14 2.0 .0 0 2.0 24 3 10 4 1.0 5 2.0 .0 0 2.0 15 INITIAL INTERVAL TYPE CODES 0 EXTENSIBLE 1 ADDED INITIAL 2 COMPUTED INITIAL w 13 1 10- Oc' t}tr4t4t+4tkt44##t#*i4*###4#4+rrrrtit#i#+*}+4i*+# t NODE 1 CONTROL SPECIFICATIONS (CONTINUED) # ++++4i+44+riitr#r#+r+rr+t+t#+4+ti+k4#i*+t4#ttt+++ VEHICULAR PHASES DATA (CONTINUED) PHASE MAX GAP MIN GAP GAP REDUCTION REDUCE BY TIME (SEC) (SEC) CODE (SEC) 1 2.00 2.00 0 .00 2 2.00 2.00 0 .00 3 2.00 2.00 0 .00 TIME TO REDUCE TO MIN GAP (SEC) GAP REDUCTION CODES 0 REDUCE BY / REDUCE EVERY 1 REDUCE BY EVERY SECOND 2 TIME TO REDUCE TO MINIMUM GAP * NODE 1 CONTROL SPECIFICATIONS (CONTINUED) PHASE FUNCTION FLAGS REDUCE VOLUME -DENSITY EVERY TIME OPERATION (SEC) .0 NO .0 NO .0 NO LAST LAG CONDITIONAL RED YELLOW DOUBLE VEHICLE RECALL RED ---- OVERLAP ---- PHASE SIMULTANEOUS DUAL PHASE LOCK LOCK ENTRY PASSAGE MIN MAX REST LAG A B C D HOLD GAPOUT SERVICE 1 NO NO NO NO NO YES NO YES NO NO NO NO NO NO NO 2 NO YES NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO 3 NO NO NO NO NO YES NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO 14 1 TRAFFIC CONTROL TABLES - ACTUATED SIGNALS * NODE 2 CONTROL SPECIFICATIONS ALLOWABLE MOVEMENT DATA PHASE-------------------------------------------- APPROACHES -------------------------------------------- ( 1, 2) ( 10, 2) ( 9, 2) ( 8, 2) LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG 1 GO GO GO NOGO NOGO NOGO NOGO NOGO GO GO GO NOGO NOGO NOGO NOGO NOGO 2 NOGO NOGO NOGO NOGO GO GO GO NOGO NOGO NOGG NOGO NOGO GO GO GO NOGO * NODE 2 CONTROL SPECIFICATIONS (CONTINUED) DETECTOR DATA DISTANCE OF COVERED TRAILING EDGE TYPE III APPROACH LANES FROM NODE 2 DETECTOR LENGTH DELAY TIME CARRY-OVER LIMIT TIME --------- DETECTOR --------- PHASE LINK A B FEET / METERS FEET / METERS (SEC) TIME (SEC) (SEC) TYPE FUNCTION 2 ( 8, 2) 9 - 0 .0 .0 25.0 7.6 .0 .0 PRESENCE EXTENSION - CALL 15 Qc itr+r+ttt++r+++**r**r*#rttt#4xxx+xrx+#tt+#rr*ki4* * NODE 2 CONTROL SPECIFICATIONS (CONTINUED) rt+t+*trrr++++tx+ttr+tt+++rttt++rr+++*r+xt++tttt+ VEHICULAR PHASES DATA -------------------- INITIAL INTERVAL ------------------- -- INTERVAL TIMINGS (SEC) -- ADDED TIME I OF 1 OF MAX MAX UNIT RED PER VEHICLE MAX ACTUATIONS ACTUATIONS MIN YELLOW RED EXTENSION GREEN EXTENSION REVERT TYPE ACTUATION INITIAL TO REACH SERVED DURING PHASE GREEN CHANGE CLEARANCE (SEC) (SEC) (SEC) (SEC) CODE (SEC) (SEC) MAX INITIAL MIN INITIAL 1 7 4 1.0 91 2.0 .0 0 2.0 98 2 7 4 1.0 0 2.0 .0 0 2.0 7 INITIAL INTERVAL TYPE CODES 0 EXTENSIBLE 1 ADDED INITIAL 2 COMPUTED INITIAL r trrtt++r++###ttx+rtt+*r++t+x+t+rrr++r*rrxx+r++xr * NODE 2 CONTROL SPECIFICATIONS (CONTINUED) #k#*#*#r#rttt#t##i*k**##tti*#*k*#**#**+i##k#*#i## • VEHICULAR PHASES DATA (CONTINUED) TIME TO REDUCE REDUCE VOLUME -DENSITY PHASE MAX GAP MIN GAP GAP REDUCTION REDUCE BY TIME TO MIN GAP EVERY TIME OPERATION (SEC) (SEC) CODE (SEC) (SEC) (SEC) 1 2.00 2.00 0 .00 .0 NO 2 2.00 2.00 0 .00 .0 NO GAP REDUCTION CODES 0 REDUCE BY / REDUCE EVERY 1 REDUCE BY EVERY SECOND 2 TIME TO REDUCE TO MINIMUM GAP 16 1 I 1 •r * NODE 2 CONTROL SPECIFICATIONS (CONTINUED) PRASE FUNCTION FLAGS LAST LAG CONDITIONAL RED YELLOW DOUBLE VEHICLE RECALL RED ---- OVERLAP ---- PHASE SIMULTANEOUS DUAL PHASE LOCK LOCK ENTRY PASSAGE MIN MAX REST LAG A B C D HOLD GAPOUT SERVICE 1 NO NO NO NO NO YES NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO 2 NO NO NO NO NO NO NO YES NO NO NO NO NO NO NO 17 1 TRAFFIC CONTROL TABLES - ACTUATED SIGNALS * NODE 3 CONTROL SPECIFICATIONS ALLOWABLE MOVEMENT DATA PHASE -------------------------------------------- APPROACHES -------------------------------------------- ( 1, 3) ( 51 3) ( 7, 3) ( 6, 3) LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG 1 GO GO GO NOGG NOGO NOGO NOGG NOGO NOGO NOGO NOGO NOGO GO GO GO NOGO 2 GO GO GO NOGO NOGO NOGO NOGO NOGO NOGO NOGO NOGO NOGO GO NOGO NOGG NOGO 3 NOGO NOGO NOGO NOGO NOGO NOGO NOGO NOGO GO GO GO NOGO NOGG NOGO NOGO NOGO 4 NOGO NOGO NOGG NOGG GO GO GO NOGO NOGO NOGO NOGO NOGO NOGO NOGG NOGO NOGO * NODE 3 CONTROL SPECIFICATIONS (CONTINUED) DETECTOR DATA DISTANCE OF COVERED TRAILING EDGE TYPE III APPROACH LANES FROM NODE 3 DETECTOR LENGTH DELAY TIME CARRY-OVER LIMIT TIME --------- DETECTOR --------- PHASE LINK A B FEET / METERS FEET / METERS (SEC) TIME (SEC) (SEC) TYPE FUNCTION 2 ( 1, 3) 7 - 0 .0 .0 25.0 7.6 .0 .0 PRESENCE EXTENSION - CALL 2 ( 6, 3) 7 - 0 .0 .0 25.0 7.6 .0 .0 PRESENCE EXTENSION - CALL 3 ( 7, 3) 9 - 0 .0 .0 25.0 7.6 .0 .0 PRESENCE EXTENSION - CALL 4 ( 51 3) 9 - 0 .0 .0 25.0 3.6 .0 .0 PRESENCE EXTENSION - CALL 10 18 1 *art**#+++*+#+t**+*+#**+rrtt##+++t+r+r+r+++r#*rat * NODE 3 CONTROL SPECIFICATIONS (CONTINUED) VEHICULAR PHASES DATA -------------------- INITIAL INTERVAL ------------------- -- INTERVAL TIMINGS (SEC) -- ADDED TIME I OF I OF MAX MAX UNIT RED PER VEHICLE MAX ACTUATIONS ACTUATIONS MIN YELLOW RED EXTENSION GREEN EXTENSION REVERT TYPE ACTUATION INITIAL TO REACH SERVED DURING PHASE GREEN CHANGE CLEARANCE (SEC) (SEC) (SEC) (SEC) CODE (SEC) (SEC) MAX INITIAL MIN INITIAL 1 10 3 1.0 40 2.0 .0 0 2.0 50 2 10 3 .0 18 2.0 .0 0 2.0 28 3 10 3 1.0 0 2.0 .0 0 2.0 10 4 10 3 1.0 2 2.0 .0 0 2.0 12 INITIAL INTERVAL TYPE CODES 0 EXTENSIBLE 1 ADDED INITIAL 2 COMPUTED INITIAL w 19 I * NODE 3 CONTROL SPECIFICATIONS (CONTINUED) VEHICULAR PHASES DATA (CONTINUED) PHASE MAX GAP MIN GAP GAP REDUCTION REDUCE BY TIME (SEC) (SEC) CODE (SEC) 1 2.00 2.00 0 .00 2 2.00 2.00 0 .00 3 2.00 2.00 0 .00 4 2.00 2.00 0 .00 TIME TO REDUCE TO MIN GAP (SEC) GAP REDUCTION CODES 0 REDUCE BY / REDUCE EVERY 1 REDUCE BY EVERY SECOND 2 TIME TO REDUCE TO MINIMUM GAP ###r###t#ti#tt#}}tt#ra#Ytik#iakkat#tirrirttri#}}} * NODE 3 CONTROL SPECIFICATIONS (CONTINUED) REDUCE EVERY TIME (SEC) .0 .0 .0 .0 VOLUME -DENSITY OPERATION NO NO NO NO PHASE FUNCTION FLAGS LAST LAG CONDITIONAL RED YELLOW DOUBLE VEHICLE RECALL RED ---- OVERLAP ---- PHASE SIMULTANEOUS DUAL PHASE LOCK LOCK ENTRY PASSAGE MIN MAX REST LAG A B C D HOLD GAPOUT SERVICE 1 NO NO NO NO NO YES NO YES NO NO NO NO NO NO NO l� 2 NO YES NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO ' 3 NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO 4 NO NO NO NO NO NO NO YES NO NO NO NO NO NO NO ***** WARMING - 109 - Link (4,1) is an approach to a micronode and services left -turn movements onto link (1,2). No opposing node has been specified. Results will be incorrect if there is an oncoming approach that has not been properly specified. 20 1 ENTRY LINK VOLUMES LINK FLOW RATE TRUCKS CAR POOLS (VEH/HOUR) (PERCENT) (PERCENT) (8002, 4) 508 0 0 (8003, 6) 1926 0 0 (8005, 7) 472 0 0 (8004, 5) 487 0 0 (8006, 8) 136 0 0 (8001, 9) 1266 0 0 (8007, 10) 112 0 0 1 VEHICLE TYPE SPECIFICATIONS VEHICLE LENGTH MAXIMUM ACCELERATION MAXIMUM SPEED Q DSCIIG HDWY TYPE FEET/METERS (MPH/SEC)/(KMPH/SEC) (MPH)/(KMPH) FACTOR (PCT) AVG. OCCUP. 0 1** 16.0/ 4.9 4.1/ - 6.6 75.0/ 120.7 100 1.3 0 2** 35.0/ 10.7 3.1/ 5.0 75.0/ 120.7 120 1.2 0 3** 16.0/ 4.9 4.1/ 6.6 75.0/ 120.7 100 3.5 0 4** 40.0/ 12.2 5.0/ 8.1 66.0/ 106.2 120 25.0 0 5 14.0/ 4.3 5.5/ 8.8 75.0/ 120.7 100 1.3 0 6 53.0/ 16.2 1.9/ 3.1 70.0/ 112.7 120 1.2 0 7 53.0/ 16.2 1.8/ 3.0 67.0/ 107.8 120 1.2 0 8 64.0/ 19.5 1.6/ 2.6 62.0/ 99.8 120 1.2 0 9 14.0/ 4.3 5.5/ 8.8 75.0/ 120.7 100 3.5 0 ** INDICATES THAT ALL PARAMETERS FOR VEHICLE TYPE ASSUME DEFAULT VALUES 1 TABLE OF MICRONODES ----- ------------ 2 1 3 i DEFAULT LINK GEOMETRIC DATA WIDTH OF LANES 12 FEET LONGITUDINAL DISTANCE FROM THE STOP 4 FEET LINE TO THE NEAR CURB FORWARD SIGHT DISTANCE AT STOP LINE 1000 FEET M� W FLEET COMPONENT PERCENTAGES AUTO TRUCK CARPOOL BUS 75 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 100 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 I LANE CHANGE DATA PARAMETERS VALUE ENGLISH / METRIC DURATION OF LANE CHANGE MANEUVER 3* MEAN DRIVER REACTION TIME 10* TIME REQUIRED FOR SUCCESSIVE LANE CHANGES 20* DECELERATION AT BEGINNING OF LANE CHANGEMANEUVER 5* / 2 DIFFERENCE IN VEHICLE'S DECELERATION OVER THE DISTANCE BETWEEN ITS POSITION WHEN IT BEGINS TO RESPOND TO AN OBSTRUCTION AND THE POSITION -OF THE OBSTRUCTION - FOR MANDATORY LANE CHANGE: 10* / 3 FOR DISCRETIONARY LANE CHANGE: 5* / 2 PANIC DECELERATION RATE OF LEAD VEHICLE FOR COMPUTATION OF CAR -FOLLOWING LAW 12* / 4 PANIC DECELERATION RATE OF FOLLOWER VEHICLE FOR COMPUTATION OF CAR -FOLLOWING LAW 12* / 4 DRIVER TYPE FACTOR USED TO COMPUTE DRIVER AGGRESSIVENESS 25* URGENCY THRESHOLD 2* / 1 SAFETY FACTOR FOR COMPUTATION OF PERCEIVED RISK OF LANE CHANGE ©* PERCENT OF DRIVERS WHO COOPERATE WITH A LANE CHANGER 50* HEADWAY BELOW WHICH ALL DRIVERS WILL ATTEMPT TO CHANGE LANES 20* HEADWAY ABOVE WHICH NO DRIVERS WILL ATTEMPT TO CHANGE LANES 50* FORWARD DISTANCE SCANNED BY DRIVER FOR A TURN MOVEMENT / BUS STATION IN ORDER TO ASSESS NEED FOR A LANE CHANGE 300* / 91 * INDICATES DEFAULT VALUES WERE SPECIFIED **** THERE WERE 1 WARNING MESSAGES IN DATA. UNITS SECONDS SECONDS * 10 SECONDS * 10 FEET (METERS) / SECOND**2 FEET [METERS] / SECOND-*2 FEET (METERS) / SECOND**2 FEET [METERS) / SECOND**2 FEET [METERS) / SECOND**2 10 * SECONDS**2 / FEET [METERS] FACTOR * 10 SECONDS * 10 SECONDS * 10 FEET / (METERS) 22 1 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C.6? o 0 ' 0 0 0 0 0 INITIALIZATION STATISTICS TIME INTERVAL SUBNETWORK PRIOR CONTENT CURRENT CONTENT PERCENT NUMBER TYPE (VEHICLES) (VEHICLES) DIFFERENCE 1 NETSIM 0 76 10000 2 NETSIM 76 126 65 3 NETSIM 126 141 11 4 NETSIM 141 157 11 5 NETSIM 157 169 7 EQUILIBRIUM ATTAINED ALL EXISTING SUBNETWORKS REACHED EQUILIBRIUM SPILLBACK ON NETSIM LINK ( 5, 3) STARTS 469 SECONDS INTO SIMULATION SPILLBACK ON NETSIM LINK ( 5, 3) ENDS 473 SECONDS INTO SIMULATION AFTER A DURATION OF 4 SECONDS SPILLBACK ON NETSIM LINK ( 5, 3) STARTS 474 SECONDS INTO SIMULATION SPILLBACK ON NETSIM LINK ( 5, 3) ENDS 400 SECONDS INTO SIMULATION AFTER A DURATION OF 6 SECONDS SPILLBACK ON NETSIM LINK ( 5, 3) STARTS 481 SECONDS INTO SIMULATION SPILLBACK ON NETSIM LINK ( 5, 3) ENDS 482 SECONDS INTO SIMULATION AFTER A DURATION OF 1 SECONDS SPILLBACK ON NETSIM LINK ( 5, 3) STARTS 509 SECONDS INTO SIMULATION SPILLBACK ON NETSIM LINK 6, 3) STARTS 519 SECONDS INTO SIMULATION SPILLBACK ON NETSIM LINK ( 6, 3) ENDS 531 SECONDS INTO SIMULATION AFTER A DURATION OF 12 SECONDS SPILLBACK ON NETSIM LINK ( 5, 3) ENDS 589 SECONDS INTO SIMULATION AFTER A DURATION OF 00 SECONDS SPILLBACK ON NETSIM LINK ( 6, 3) STARTS 614 SECONDS INTO SIMULATION SPILLBACK ON NETSIM LINK ( 5, 3) STARTS 618 SECONDS INTO SIMULATION SPILLBACK ON NETSIM LINK ( 6, 3) ENDS 623 SECONDS INTO SIMULATION AFTER A DURATION OF 9 SECONDS SPILLBACK ON NETSIM LINK ( 6, 3) STARTS 624 SECONDS INTO SIMULATION SPILLBACK ON NETSIM LINK ( 6, 3) ENDS 628 SECONDS INTO SIMULATION AFTER A DURATION OF 4 SECONDS SPILLBACK ON NETSIM LINK ( 6, 3) STARTS 630 SECONDS INTO SIMULATION SPILLBACK ON NETSIM LINK ( 6, 3) ENDS 631 SECONDS INTO SIMULATION AFTER A DURATION OF 1 SECONDS SPILLBACK ON NETSIM LINK ( 5, 3) ENDS 709 SECONDS INTO SIMULATION AFTER A DURATION OF 91 SECONDS SPILLBACK ON NETSIM LINK ( 6, 3) STARTS 716 SECONDS INTO SIMULATION SPILLBACK ON NETSIM LINK ( 6, 3) ENDS 742 SECONDS INTO SIMULATION AFTER A DURATION OF 26 SECONDS SPILLBACK ON NETSIM LINK 1 6, 3) STARTS 744 SECONDS INTO SIMULATION SPILLBACK ON NETSIM LINK ( 6, 3) ENDS 745 SECONDS INTO SIMULATION AFTER A DURATION OF 1 SECONDS SPILLBACK ON NETSIM LINK ( 5, 3) STARTS 746 SECONDS INTO SIMULATION SPILLBACK ON NETSIM LINK ( 6, 3) STARTS 746 SECONDS INTO SIMULATION SPILLBACK ON NETSIM LINK ( 6, 3) ENDS 740 SECONDS INTO SIMULATION AFTER A DURATION OF 2 SECONDS SPILLBACK ON NETSIM LINK ( 6, 3) STARTS 750 SECONDS INTO SIMULATION ' SPILLBACK ON NETSIM LINK ( 6, 3) ENDS 751 SECONDS INTO SIMULATION AFTER A DURATION OF 1 SECONDS SPILLBACK ON NETSIM LINK ( 5, 3) ENDS 807 SECONDS INTO SIMULATION AFTER A DURATION OF 61 SECONDS SPILLBACK ON NETSIM LINK ( 5, 3) STARTS 808 SECONDS INTO SIMULATION SPILLBACK ON NETSIM LINK ( 5, 3) ENDS 809 SECONDS INTO SIMULATION AFTER A DURATION OF 1 SECONDS SPILLBACK ON NETSIM LINK ( 5, 3) STARTS 810 SECONDS INTO SIMULATION SPILLBACK ON NETSIM LINK ( 6, 3) STARTS 815 SECONDS INTO SIMULATION SPILLBACK ON NETSIM LINK ( 5, 3) ENDS 818 SECONDS INTO SIMULATION AFTER A DURATION OF 8 SECONDS SPILLBACK ON NETSIM LINK ( 5, 3) STARTS 820 SECONDS INTO SIMULATION SPILLBACK ON NETSIM LINK ( 5, 3) ENDS 826 SECONDS INTO SIMULATION AFTER A DURATION OF 6 SECONDS SPILLBACK ON NETSIM LINK ( 5, 3) STARTS 829 SECONDS INTO SIMULATION SPILLBACK ON NETSIM LINK ( 6, 3) ENDS 858 SECONDS INTO SIMULATION AFTER A DURATION OF 43 SECONDS SPILLBACK ON NETSIM LINK ( 4, 1) STARTS 869 SECONDS INTO SIMULATION SPILLBACK ON NETSIM LINK ( 4, 1) ENDS 671 SECONDS INTO SIMULATION AFTER A DURATION OF 2 SECONDS SPILLBACK ON NETSIM LINK ( 4, 1) STARTS 889 SECONDS INTO SIMULATION SPILLBACK ON NETSIM LINK ( 4, 1) ENDS 893 SECONDS INTO SIMULATION AFTER A DURATION OF 4 SECONDS SPILLBACK ON NETSIM LINK ( 4, 1) STARTS 095 SECONDS INTO SIMULATION 23 1 CUMULATIVE NETSIM STATISTICS AT TIME 17:15: 0 ELAPSED TIME IS 0:15: 0 ( 900 SECONDS), TIME PERIOD 1 ELAPSED TIME IS 900 SECONDS VEHICLE MINUTES RATIO MINUTES/MILE ----- SECONDS / VEHICLE ---- -- AVERAGE VALUES -- VEHICLE MOVE DELAY TOTAL MOVE/ TOTAL DELAY TOTAL DELAY QUEUE• STOP* STOPS VOLUME SPEED LINK ---- MILES ----------- TRIPS TIME -------------------- TIME TIME TOTAL ----- TIME ------------- TIME TIME ----------------------------- TIME TIME TIME M ------------------- VPH MPH ( 2, 11 55.34 261 110.7 323.0 433.7 .26 7.84 5.84 99.7 74.3 60.5 56.7 76 1044 7.7 ( 1, 2) 79.76 376 159.5 36.6 196.1 .81 2.46 .46 31.3 5.8 .6 .5 5 1504 24.4 ( 1, 3) 42.30 264 64.6 739.5 824.0 .10 19.48 17.48 107.3 168.1 126.5 97.8 93 1056 3.1 ( 3, 1) 71.07 443 142.1 100.7 242.8 .59 3.42 1.42 32.9 13.6 5.9 5.4 38 1772 17.6 ( 4, 1) 7.29 77 14.6 129.4 144.0 .10 19.74 17.74 112.2 100.8 132.5 124.9 87 300 3.0 ( 1, 4) 6.49 69 13.0 11.5 24.5 .53 3.78 1.78 21.3 10.0 7.7 7.7 0 276 15.9 (8002, 4) 126 504 ( 3, 5) 4.68 50 9.4 3.2 12.5 .75 2.67 .67 15.0 3.8 .9 .9 0 200 22.4 ( 5, 3) 7.10 75 14.2 345:5 359.7 .04 50.65 48.65 287.8 276.4 257.0 240.5 97 300 1.2 ( 7, 3) 9.56 101 19.1 149.5 168.6 .11 17.63 15.63 100.2 88.8 91.9 89.9 96 404 3.4 ( 3, 7) 20.08 216 40.2 25.6 65.8 .61 3.28 1.28 18.3 7.1 3.9 3.8 0 864 18.3 ( 3, 6) 22.00 179 44.0 7.0 51.0 .86 2.32 .32 17.1 2.4 .1 .0 0 716 25.9 ( 6, 3) 52.81 429 105.6 546.7 652.3 .16 12.35 10.35 91.2 76.5 53.1 47.8 96 1716 4.9 (8003, 6) 460 1840 (8005, 7) 118 472 (8004, 5) 99 396 1 2, 10) 3.04 33 6.1 2.3 8.4 .73 2.75 .75 15.2 4.1 2.2 2.2 0 132 21.8 ( 10, 2) 2.37 25 4.7 24.5 29.2 .16 12.35 10.35 70.2 58.8 54.2 53.8 96 100 4.9 ( 91 2) 53.00 310 106.0 10.9 116.9 .91 2.21 .21 22.1 2.1 .9 .8 10 1272 27.2 ( 2, 9) 64.95 390 129.9 23.2 153.1 .85 2.36 .36 23.6 3.6 .1 .1 0 1560 25.5 1 2, 8) 3.00 32 6.0 4.0 10.8 .56 3.59 1.59 20.2 8.9 4.7 4.6 0 128 16.7 ( 8, 2) 3.03 32 6.1 23.6 29.7 .20 9.79 7.79 55.6 44.3 40.7 40.0 90 128 6.1 (8006, 8) 33 132 (8001, 9) 316 1264 (8007, 10) 28 112 OSUBNETWORK= 507.89 969 16.93 41.79 50.72 .29 6.94 4.94 3.64 2.59 1.94 1.74 141.6 8.6 -- VEHICLE - HOURS -- --- MINUTES / VEHICLE -TRIG' --- PER TRIP I 24 1 CUMULATIVE NETSIM STATISTICS AT TIME 17:15: 0 ELAPSED TIME IS 0:15: 0 ( 900 SECONDS), TIME PERIOD 1 ELAPSED TIME IS 900 SECONDS VEH-MINS * AVERAGE -- CONGESTION -- ------------ Q U E U E L E N G T H (VEHICLE) ------------ QUEUE STOP OCCUPANCY STORAGE PHASE AVERAGE QUEUE BY LANE ** MAXIMUM QUEUE BY LANE LINK ---- TIME ------------- TIME (VEHICLE) --------- (1) ---------------- FAILURE 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 1 - 2 - 3 4 - - 5 - 6 7 - - ( 2, 1) 320.6 300.4 33.3 29.7 2 12 13 0 0 0 0 0 32 32 0 0 0 0 0 ( 1, 2) 3.8 3.2 11.6 9.9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 6 0 0 0 0 0 ( 11 3) 729.3 563.9 63.9 71.0 0 0 21 0 0 0 0 3 4 39 0 0 0 0 6 ( 3, 1) 45.3 41.6 13.5 14.4 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 11 11 0 0 0 0 8 1 4, 1) 284.8 268.5 21.9 43.7 6 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 2 0 0 0 0 0 ( 1, 4) 8.9 0.9 2.0 4.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ( 3, 5) .8 .6 .7 1.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ( 5, 3) 509.7 492.9 37.1 67.4 6 0 24 0 0 0 0 1 1 27 0 0 0 0 5 ( 7, 3) 199.1 194.7 16.0 •29.1 7 1 11 0 0 0 0 2 5 22 0 0 0 0 5 ( 3, 7) 14.1 13.9 3.6 7.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ( 3, 6) .2 .1 2.7 4.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ( 6, 3) 417.6 375.9 45.6 60.0 6 14 18 0 0 0 0 0 35 35 0 0 0 3 2 ( 2, 10) 1.2 1.2 .6 1.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ( 10, 2) 27.1 26.9 2.8 5.5 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 ( 91 2) 4.7 4.3 8.0 8.6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 3 0 0 0 0 1 ( 2, 9) .4 .3 8.5 9.6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ( 2, 8) 2.5 2.5 .7 1.4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ( 8, 2) 23.7 23.4 2.7 5.3 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 OSUBNETWORK- 2593.9 2323.5 275.0 22.1 27 * THESE VALUES INCLUDE THE TIME FOR VEHICLES CURRENTLY ON THE LINK. ** AVERAGE QUEUE CALCULATED BASED ON TIME SINCE BEGINNING OF SIMULATION 0 NUMBER OF LANE CHANGES 96 88 191 127 27 10 6 40 5 38 24 130 1 0 32 62 2 1 880 25 1 CUMULATIVE NETSIM STATISTICS AT TIME 17:15: 0 ELAPSED TIME IS 0:15: 0 ( 900 SECONDS), TIME PERIOD 1 ELAPSED TIME IS 900 SECONDS DISCHARGE BY LANE LANE 1 LANE 2 LANE 3 LANE 4 LANE 5 LANE VEH 6 VPH LINK VEH VPH VEH VPH VEH VPH VEH VPH VEH VPH ( 2, 1) 132. 528 129 516 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ( 1, 2) 187 748 184 736 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 ( 1, 31 120 480 35 140 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ( 3, 1) 203 812 183 732 0 0 0 p p 0 0 ( 4, 1) 72 288 5 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ( 1, 4) 18 72 51 204 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ( 3, 5) 14 56 36 144 0 0 0 p p 0 0 0 ( 5, 3) 7 28 49 196 0 0 0 0 0 0 p 0 ( 7, 3) 51 204 32 128 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ( 3, 7) 80 352 120 512 0 0 0 0 0 pp 0 0 ( 3, 6) 106 424 73 292 0 0 0 0 p 57 220 ( 6, 3) 101 724 180 720 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ( 2, 10) 23 92 10 40 0 0 0 0 p p0 0 0 ( 10, 2) 16 64 9 36 0 0 0 0 0 p 0 ( 91 2) 149 596 159 636 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ( 2, 9) 204 816 186 744 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p p ( 2, 8) 17 68 15 60 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p ( 81 2) 24 96 8 32 0 0 LANE 7 VEH VPH 0 0 5 20 109 436 57 228 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 76 18 72 0 0 0 0 11 44 0 0 0 0 10 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 NETSIM PERSON MEASURES OF EFFECTIVENESS 1 LINK PERSON PERSON DELAY TRAVEL TIME MILE TRIPS PERSON -MIN PERSON -MIN ( 2, 1) 71.9 339.3 419.9 563.8 ( 11 2) 103.7 488.8 47.6 255.0 ( 11 3) 55.0 343.2 961.3 1071.3 ( 3, 1) 92..4 575.9 130.9 315.7 ( 4, 1) 9.5 100.1 168.2 187.2 ( 1, 4) 8,q 89.7 15.0 31.8 ( 3, 5) 6.1 65.0 4.1 16.3 467.7 ( 51 3) 9.2 97.5 449.2 219.2 ( 7, 3) 12.4 131.3 194.4 85.5 ( 3, 7) 26.1 200.0 33.3 66.4 ( 3, 6) 28.6 232.7 9.2 710.7 048.0 ( 6, 3) 68.7 557.7 3.0 10. ( 2, 101. 4.0 42.9 32.5 31.0 38.0 ( 10, ( 91 2) 2) 3.1 60.9 413.4 14.2 152.0 ( 2, 9) 84.4 507.0 30.2 199.1 14.0 ( 2, 0) 3.9 41.6 6.2 30.7 30.6 ( 8, �1 3.9 41.6 1 *** NOTE *** TIME PERIOD 1 SPECIFIC NETSIM STATISTICS ARE THE SAME AS CUMULATIVE OUTPUT AT THE END OF TIME PERIOD 1. 27 i LINK VEHICLE TYPE- 11 4) ( 3, 5) ( 3, 7) ( 3, 6) 1 2, 9) ( 2, t3) ( 2, 10; ( 1, 2) ( 1, 3) ( 3, 1) ( 7, 3) ( 5, 3) ( 6, 3) ( 2, 1) ( 8, 2) ( 9, 2) ( 10, 2) ( 4, 1► SUBNETWORK- 1 NETSIM CUMULATIVE VALUES OF FUEL CONSUMPTION FUEL CONSUMPTION GALLONS M.P.G. 8 4 5 1 1.21 2 6 7 .00 8 .00 4 .00 5 4.98 1 3.97 2 .00 6 .00 7 .00 .00 .00 .32 .71 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 6.34 4.98 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .18 1.00 3.74 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 5.17 3.98 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .74 2.18 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 8.15 7.28 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 1.66 5.68 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 9.65 6.46 8.53 4.47 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .14 .46 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 6.86 5.19 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .09 1.64 .45 6.45 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 12.29 9.50 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 4.50 19.39 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 2.83 1.70 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 2.14 8.86 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 8.10 5.87 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .66 3.53 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 4.30 2.09 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 1.03 7.45 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 1.42 4.59 .05 2.85 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 2.54 14.72 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 7.47 4.84 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 1.94 9.76 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 9.18 4.44 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .07 .53 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 15.79 13.50 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .80 2.87 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 4.04 3.89 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .11 1.16 .51 3.88 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 2.58 1.63 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 20.72 92.39 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 6.23 4.23 .00 .00 .00 .00 VEHICLE TYPES 1, 5 = AUTO, VEHICLE TYPES 2, 6, 7, 8 = TRUCK, VEHICLE TYPE 4 = BUS NETSIM CUMULATIVE VALUES OF EMISSION LINK VEHICLE EMISSIONS (GRAMS/ MILE) HC VEHICLE TYPE- 5 1 2 6 .00 1 .00 8 .00 4 .00 ( 11 4) ( 3, 5) .52 .48 .98 .81 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 3, 7) .53 1.02 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 3, 6) .31 .47 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 2, 9) .24 .31 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 2, 8) .40 .88 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 2, 10) .45 .76 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 11 2) .15 .31 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 11 3) .50 1.39 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 3, 1) .30 .60 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 7, 3) .34 .77 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 51 3) .42 1.35 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 6, 3) .34 .87 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 2, 1) .18 .45 •.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 81 2) .23 .41 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 91 2) .13 .21 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 10, 2) .38 .47 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 4, 1) .33 .87 .00 .00 . .00 .00 .00 SUBNETWORK- .28 .60 .00 6, 7, .00 8 = TRUCK, 00 VEHICLE TYPE .00 4 = TRANSIT .00 BUS VEHICLE TYPES 1, 5 = AUTO, VEHICLE TYPES 2, 00 28 1 NETSIM CUMULATIVE VALUES OF EMISSION LINK VEHICLE EMISSIONS (GRAMS/ MILE) CO VEHICLE TYPE- 5 32.72 1 86.02 2 .00 6 .00 7 .00 8 .00 9 .00 ( 11 4) ( 3, 5) 33.15 10.79 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 3, 7) 33.48 88.92 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 3, 6) 20.38 38.85 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 2, 9) 16.63 28.87 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 2, 8) 27.40 75.38 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 2, 10) 34.99 64.88 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 1, 2) 10.43 22.62 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 11 3) 27.40 111.03 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 3, 1) 20.16 48.26 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 7, 3) 24.59 66.31 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 5, 3) 28.99 124.21 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 6, 3) 18.83 71.74 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 2, 1) 10.24 35.26 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( e, 2) 17.21 30.76 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 91 2) 9.40 13.15 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 10, 2) 29.62 36.58 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 4, 1) 23.87 72.10 .00 .00 .00 .00 00 .00 00 SUBNETWORK- 17.87 48.40 VEHICLE TYPES .00 2, 6, 7, 8 .00 = TRUCK, VEHICLE .00 TYPE 4 = TRANSIT BUS VEHICLE TYPES 1, 5 - AUTO, 1 NETSIM CUMULATIVE VALUES OF EMISSION LINK VEHICLE EMISSIONS (GRAMS/ MILE) NO VEHICLE TYPE- 5 1 3.05 2 G 7 .00 8 .00 4 .00 ( 11 4) ( 3, 5) 2.62 2.06 2.43 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 3, 7) 2.60 3.10 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 3, 6) 1.40 1.59 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 2, 9) 1.11 1.27 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 2, 8) 1.79 2.71 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 2, 10) 1.75 2.37 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 1, 2) .71 2.06 1.05 5.05 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 1, 3) ( 3, 1) 1.35 1.90 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 w� ( 7, 3) 1,70 2.49 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 Qfl ( 5, 3) 2.55 4.60 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 6, 3) 1.76 2.90 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 2, 1) .86 1.53 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 81 2) .89 1.20 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 91 2) ,46 .71 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 Cr,' ( 10, 2) 1.60 1.43 3.14 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 4, 1) SUBNETWORK- 1.82 1.37 2.02 .00 .00 .00 ..00 00 00 .00 VEHICLE TYPES 1, 5 = AUTO, VEHICLE TYPES 2, 6, 1, 8 = TRUCK, VEHICLE TYPE 4 = TRANSIT BUS 29 1 CUMULATIVE VALUES OF CONFLICTS FOR MICRO -INTERSECTIONS AVG. NO. AVG. NO. AVG. NO. AVG. NO. AVG. NO. OF OF OF OF OF CONFLICTS CONFLICTS CONFLICTS CONFLICTS CONFLICTS PRIMARY MVMNT: L L PER L T T PER T R R PER R D D PER D PER CONFLICTING MVMNT: T/D --- L/R --- MANEUVER -------- T/D --- L/R --- MANEUVER -------- T/D --- L/R --- MANEUVER -------- T/D --- L/R --- MANEUVER -------- APPROACH -------- MICRO -NODE: 2 APPROACH LINK ------------- ( 1, 2) 0 0 ( .00) 0 1 ( .00) 0 0 ( .00) 0 0 ( .00) ( .00) ( 10, 2) 2 0 ( .50) 0 0 ( .00) 0 0 ( .00) 0 0 ( .00) ( •00) ( 91 2) 0 0 ( .00) 0 2 ( .01) 0 0 ( .00) 0 0 ( .00) ( .01) ( 81 2) 2 0 ( .50) 0 1 ( .08) 2 0 ( .13) 0 0 ( .00) ( .16) THERE ARE A TOTAL OF 10 CONFLICTS OUT OF 747 TRIPS THROUGH INTERSECTION, OR AN AVERAGE OF .01 CONFLICTS PER TRIP MICRO -NODE: 1 APPROACH LINK ------------- 2, 1) 0 0 ( .00) 1 2 ( .01) 1 0 ( .10) 0 0 ( .00) ( .02) ( 3, 1) 10 0 ( .16) 0 0 ( .00) 0 0 ( .00) 0 0 ( .00) ( .02) ( 4, 1) 4 0 ( .86) 0 0 ( .00) 0 0 ( .00) 0 0 ( .00) ( .05) THERE ARE A TOTAL OF 18 CONFLICTS OUT OF 777 TRIPS THROUGH INTERSECTION, OR AN AVERAGE OF .02 CONFLICTS PER TRIP MICRO -NODE: 3 APPROACH LINK ------------- ( 1, 3) 4 2 ( .06) 0 3 ( .02) 0 0 ( .00) 0 0 ( .00) ( .03) ( 5, 3) 0 0 ( .00) 0 0 ( .00) 0 0 ( .00) 0 0 ( .00) ( .00) ( 7, 3) 3 3 ( .29) 0 0 ( .00) 0 0 ( .00) 0 0 ( .00) ( 06) ( 6, 3) 2 0 ( .18) 0 0 ( .00) 0 0 ( .00) 0 0 (:00) ( 00) THERE ARE A TOTAL OF 17 CONFLICTS OUT OF 069 TRIPS THROUGH INTERSECTION, OR AN AVERAGE OF .02 CONFLICTS PER TRIP THE HIGHEST NUMBER OF VEHICLES ON THE NETWORK WAS 392 VEHICLES (MAXIMUM ALLOWED IS 10000). CD THIS MAXIMUM OCCURRED AT 818 SECONDS. TOTAL CPU TIME FOR SIMULATION a 646.64 SECONDS ' OTAL CPU TIME FOR THIS RUN - 646.64 SECONDS 0*T**** THERE WERE 1 WARNING MESSAGES IN DATA FOR CASE OLAST CASE PROCESSED 30 Appendix 9: A.ADT Trends Within the Study Area Between 1993 and 1997 608_ 76 AADT Trends Between 1993 and 1997 Within the Study Area Average Annual Daily Traffic Volume" Difference Difference Station # 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1996-1997 1993-1997 86 10,100 10,800 8,200 10,300 11,700 13.6°% 15.8°% 5041 25,500 16,200 16,600 23,000 23,000 0.0°% -9 8°% 5042 33,000 18,800 16,800 28,000 27,500 -1.8°% -16.7°% 5039 28,000 22,300 24,000 26,500 25,000 -5.7°% -10.7°% 5090 14,000 13,500 15,000 11,000 11,000 0.0°% -21.4 ' Source: Florida Department of Transportation - Division of Planning, District VI. 8_ 7S6 TERREMARK BRICKELL II N/K/A MILLENNIUM TOWER Amendment to MUSP SITE UTILITY STUDY May 8,1998 TERREMARK BRICKELL II SITE STUDY SUBMITTED TO: CITY OF MIAMI PREPARED FOR: TERREMARK BRICKELL II PARTNERSHIP PREPARED BY: BERMELLO, AJAMIL & PARTNERS, INC. OCTOBER 31,1997 98- 786 1. DRAINAGE 1.1 GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS The proposed development is located on a site abutting Brickell Avenue to the West, SE 14' Terrace to the North, and SE 140' Lane to the South. The site has a net area of 3.74 acres. The site is presently vacant, except for two houses on the frontage to Brickell Avenue. After development, approximately 85% of the site will be impervious, and 15% will remain as pervious areas. Storm water discharge from the proposed developed area will consist primarily of building roofs, driveways and landscape areas runoff. It is not anticipated any change in the existing discharge and drainage system on the public right-of-way. 1.2 OFF -SITE DRAINAGE SYSTEM The City of Miami presently maintains a roadway drainage system for all the abutting roads with the site. Because the site is mostly undeveloped, it does not contribute any significant amount of storm water runoff to this drainage system. The proposed development will be designed with total on -site retention of storm water runoff, and no changes on the right-of-way storm water discharge. We estimate that the existing roadway drainage system is of sufficient capacity to handle the pre -development and post -development conditions. 1.3 ON -SITE DRAINAGE SYSTEM. A MSSW General Permit will be required for this development due to the size and percentage of imperviousness of the site. Under this permit it will be required to match pre -development and post - development conditions for a 100-year, 3-day storm event with no discharge. Total on -site retention is required for all other storm events up to 25-years. Terremark II - Millennium Tower May 8, 1998 Bermello, AjGmil, Handel Joint Venture Page 1 98- 786 The drainage system for the proposed development will provide total on -site retention of storm water runoff; no off -site runoff is anticipated from the development. Due to the existing conditions of low back -of -sidewalk elevations, high ground water table, and proximity to Biscayne Bay, deep injection drainage wells will be required for the storm water runoff disposal. Wells will be designed to handle the peak runoff volumes, and will be tested for the required capacity and water quality parameters as they are installed. Storm water will be collected through a system of catch basin inlets and conveyed to the well locations. Runoff from driving surfaces and parking areas will be routed to detention structures for quality pre-treatment prior to flowing into the wells. 1.4 DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS. 1.4.1 Peak Runoff Total Area Impervious (85%) Pervious (15%) Weighted Runoff Coefficient Design Storm Time of Concentration Rainfall Intensity Peak Runoff (Q=C.i.A) 1.4.2 Well Calculations 3.74 Ac. 3.18 Ac. 0.56 Ac. C= (3.18x0.90 + 0.56x0.25)/3.74 = 0.80 10 years 15 minutes 6.2 in/hr Q= 0.80x6.20.74 = 18.55 cfs Assuming 24" diameter wells with capacities of 650 gpm/ft-head Terremark II - Millennium Tower May 8, 1998 Bermello, Ajamil, Handel Joint Venture Page 2 98- 786 Average October G.W.L Head Well Capacity Total wells required 1.4.3 Detention. 2.00 N.G.V.D. 3.00 ft Q = 6500.00 =1950 gpm = 4.34 cfs 18.55 cfs/4.34 cfs = 4.27 Say 5 Wells Provide 1-1/2 min (90 sec) detention time. Volume required 4.34 cfs x 90 sec = 390.60 cf Provide 5 tanks each with the following approximate dimensions: 6' wide x 7' deep x 10' long. For a total volume of 420 cf per tank. Terremark II - Millennium Tower Bermello, Ajamil, Handel Joint Venture May 8, 1998 Page 3 98- 786 2. WATER DISTRIBUTION 2.1 MIAMI-DADE W.A.S.D. REQUIREMENTS Miami -Dade W.A.S.D. owns and operates a 20 inch water main located along Brickell Avenue, and a 6 inch / 4 inch loop along SE 14`h Terrace and SE 14`h Lane. There is also a 4 inch water main interconnecting both branches of the loop from SE 141h Terrace to SE 10 Lane. A new 12 inch water main is being presently installed on SE 14`h Terrace from Brickell Avenue to the east boundary of the Fortune House property. The developer will install a new 12 inch water main from the east boundary of the Fortune House property along SE 14'h Terrace and SE 14'h Lane to connect to the existing 20 inch main on Brickell Avenue. Additional fire hydrants will be installed from this new water main in order to provide adequate fire protection to the proposed development. The 4 inch water main interconnecting the loop from SE 14`h Terrace to SE 14`h Lane will be abandoned. 2.2 WATER SERVICES Fire protection, domestic and irrigation water services will be installed from the new 12 inch water main, which is estimated to provide the required water demand of the development. 2.3 WATER DEMAND The anticipated water demand for this development are as follows: Residential: 190 Units @ 200 GPD/Unit ................... 38,000 GPD Hotel: 426 Rooms @ 100 GPD/Room ..................... 42,600 GPD Office: 204,800 SF @ 10 GPD/100SF .................... 20,480 GPD Terremark II - Millennium Tower May 8, 1998 P-rmello, Ajamil, Handel Joint Venture Page 4 9 - 786 Retail: 11,716 SF @ 5 GPD/100SF ......................... 585 GPD Restaurant: 200 Seats @ 50 GPD/Seat ................... 10,000 GPD Sports Club: 91,393 FT @ 35 GPD/100 s.f................. 33,953 GPD Total Water Demand ................................. 145,618 GPD Terremark II - Millennium Tower May 8, 1998 Bermello, Ajamil, Handel Joint Venture Page 5 98 - 786 3. SEWAGE COLLECTION 3.1 MIAMI-DADE W.A.S.D. REQUIREMENTS Miami -Dade W.A.S.D. owns and operates a 15 inch sanitary sewer main along SE 14' Terrace from Brickell Avenue for approximately 170 feet to the west, and then running south through an easement on the Property and crossing SE 14`h Lane. There are also 10 and 12 inch sanitary sewer mains on easements inside the Property and running from SE 14`h Terrace to the south crossing SE 14' Lane. As -built information for this area is very limited and more detailed investigations (survey) need to be performed. All sanitary sewer mains inside the Property will be abandoned. Proper connection of the existing 15 inch main on SE 14t' Terrace should be provided. 3.2 SANITARY SERVICES Sanitary services will be provided for each individual tower, and connected to the existing sewer mains in the public right-of-way. 3.3 SEWAGE FLOWS From 2.3 we obtain the following sewage flows: Residential Average flow: 38,000 GPD / 25 GPM (Based on 18 Hrs/Day) Peak flow: 123 GPM (Based on 3.5 peak factor) Hotel Average flow: 42,600 GPD / 30 GPM (Based on 24 Hrs/Day) Peak flow: 133 GPM (Based on 4.5 peak factor) Office Average flow: 20,520 GPD / 29 GPM (Based on 12 Hrs/Day) Peak flow: 128 GPM (Based on 4.5 peak factor) Terremark II - Millennium Tower May 8, 1998 Bermello, Ajamil, Handel Joint Venture Page 6 98- 786 Retail Average flow: 335 GPD / 0.5 GPM (Based on 12 Hrs/Day) Peak flow: 2.0 GPM (Based on 4.5 peak factor) Restaurant Average flow: 10,000 GPD / 14 GPM (Based on 12 Hrs/Day) Peak flow: 63 GPM (Based on 4.5 peak factor) Sports Club Average Flow 33,953 / 31 GPM (Based on 18 Hrs/Day) Peak Flow 14.1 GPM (Based on 4.5 Peak Factor) Total Sewage Flow Average 145,408 GPD / 139.5 GPM Peak Flow 590 GPM Terremark II - Millennium Tower May 8, 1998 Bermello, Ajamil, Handel Joint Venture Page 7 9S w�(x TERREMARK BRICKELL II N/A/A MILLENNIUM TOWER Amendment to MUSP ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY May 8, 1998 MILLENNIUM TOWER ECONOMIC AND TAX IMPACT STUDY SUBMITTED TO: CITY OF MIAIVII PREPARED FOR: TERREMARK BRICKELL II, LTD. PREPARED BY: SHARPTON, BRUNSON & COMPANY, P.A. One Southeast Third Ave. Suite 2100 Miami, Florida 33131 (305) 374-1574 May 8,1998 98- 786 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1-3 INTRODUCTION, OBJECTIVE AND DEFINITIONS Introduction 4 Objectives 5 Definitions of Economic and Tax Impact 5 Direct and Indirect Effects 6 Measures of Economic Impact 7 Description of Results 8 THE PROJECT OVERVIEW 9 DISCUSSION OF THE RESULTS OF THE ANALYSIS Impact Indicators 10 Results of Indicators 10 Impact of Construction 11 Impact of Ongoing Operations 11 Impact on Local Tax Revenues 11 DISCUSSION OF THE RESULTS BY ECONOMIC INDICATOR Employment 12 Wages 13 Output 14 Local Taxes 15 OTHER CONSIDERATIONS Public Sector Cost 17 Impact Fees 17 EXHIBITS 18 Exhibit I: Summary of Economic Impact Exhibit II: Summary of all Direct Economic Benefits Exhibit III: Computation of Indirect Benefits Exhibit IV: Schedule of Project Development Cost Exhibit V: Schedule of Ad Valorem Taxes Exhibit VI: Allocation of Ad Valorem Taxes Exhibit VII: Impact and Other Fees 98- 786 MILLENNIUM TOWER EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 98 - 786 MILLENNIUM TOWER INTRODUCTION, OBJECTIVES AND DEFINITIONS 58- 7S6 SUMMARY OF ECONOMIC IMPACT BENEFITS Millennium Tower (the Project) will bring significant economic benefits to Greater Miami. This section summarizes the impact of the Project on employment, public sector revenues and other economic benefits as a result of the development. Employment Employment considerations include the direct employment resulting from the Project and employment created in the surrounding community through hotel guests', new residents', and office workers', spending. Average developmental phase employment will be approximately 350 employees and 480 people are expected to be employed during the on -going maintenance and operations of the office, hotel, condominiums and extended stay facilities. Tax Revenue The estimate of public sector revenues associated with the development includes taxes and other revenues generated directly by the Project. Although public sector costs are important elements in measuring fiscal impact, these benefits have not been quantified in this document. This analysis only measures the benefits derived from the development. Total tax revenues expected to be created are as follows: Developmental $ 823,404 Operational $8,772,969 Output The estimate of total economic impact is measured by total output. This analysis measures the economic impact of developmental costs and ongoing, operational expenditures. To determine the effect of respending within Greater Miami, we utilized a multiplier to compute total direct and indirect benefits. Total output expected to be generated as a result of the developmental and operational phases of the Project will approximate the following: Developmental $496,765,293 Operational $ 36,181,760 MILLENNIUM TOWER - Economic Impact Study May 8, 1998 Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. Page I ItJ W �6 SUMMARY OF ECONOMIC IMPACT BENEFITS Significant Community Benefits: • Jobs • Wages • Taxes • Economic Activity Residents' & Guests' Spending Impacting to Local Businesses: • Restaurant/Food • Recreation/Entertainment • Transportation • Retail MILLENNIUM TOWER - Economic Impact Study Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. May 8, 1998 Page 2 SUMMARY OF ECONOMIC IMPACT BENEFITS The following table and chart summarizes the economic impact of the MILLENNIUM TOWER development: Construction Period t Annual ecurrin Economic Activity Stimulated: output $496,765,293 $36,181,760 Wages 51,100,000 23,600,000 Taxes 823,404 8,772,969 Total $548,688,697 $68 554 729 Jobs created 350 480 Economic Activity Stimulated 500000 400000 w a 300000 c y 200000 3 t 100000 H 0 Construction Period Annual Recurring Output N Wages 0 Taxes MILLENNIUM TOWER - Economic Impact Study May 8, 1998 Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. Page 3 9 8 - 7 S (3 INTRODUCTION, OBJECTIVES AND DEFINITIONS Introduction This document represents an in-depth economic and tax benefits analysis of the developmental and operational phases of a first class hotel, an extended stay first class facility (the Philips Club), luxury residential units and an office component located on Brickell Avenue between 14th Terrace and 14th Lane in the City of Miami, Florida (the Project). The development consists of a parcel with a net lot area of 162,989.56 square feet. The gross lot area is 222,854.12 square feet. The Project is a unique slender tower that contains hotel functions, lobbies and a sports club in the first 9 levels. Levels 10 through 17 house the office development of 236,833 square feet and levels 20 and 21 house the hotel. The Project has a ballroom, meeting and board rooms, hotel restaurant, bar and other amenities. The restaurant will have pedestrian access from Brickell Avenue and from the hotel. Additionally, there will be retail along Brickell Avenue, 14th Terrace and 14th Lane. The Phillips Club's accomodations are complemented by a full range of services and amenities. It occupies levels 32 through 41 of the Project. The residential units are from level 42 to level 78. The Project includes a 6 level parking structure with 1218 parking spaces supporting the entire development. The 7th floor of the parking structure serves as the recreation deck, with both indoor and outdoor amenities. The Project will be within walking distance of sidewalk cafes, charming restaurants and exquisite shops located in the heart of the Brickell area. Few places in this country are as fascinating as Miami. The sunshine. The beach. The culture. The lifestyle that is always exciting, forever changing, and never what you would expect. This project will contribute significantly to the ambiance of the area. This analysis encompasses the entire Project and estimates the economic and tax benefits for both its developmental and operational phases. 10 MILLENNIUM TOWER - Economic Impact Study May 8, 1998 Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. Page 4 INTRODUCTION, OBJECTIVES AND DEFINITIONS Objectives The objective of this analysis is to provide information on the various benefits created by the Project and to prepare an estimate of such benefits to Miami, Florida (the City). Our analysis is based on an economic model which estimates economic and tax impacts of various projects on a designated area. The model is specifically tailored to the economy of the City. Definition of Economic and Tax Impact The construction and subsequent operation of the Project will create important benefits within Greater Miami. These benefits include new income, new jobs, new tax revenues and new economic activity impacting upon every sector of the local economy. Moreover, through the multiplier effect of respending and reinvesting, indirect economic benefits are added to the direct benefits brought about by initial construction expenditures and the expenditures from ongoing operations. MILLENNIUM TOWER - Economic Impact Study May 8, 1998 Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. Page 5 INTRODUCTION, OBJECTI * ES AND DEFINITIONS Direct and Indirect Effects The total economic impact of public and private projects and policies on a region does not end with the impact from the initial construction expenditures; the continued benefits to the local economy must also be considered. Income to firms furnishing construction materials and services is subsequently converted into employee salaries, material purchases, investment in plant and equipment, savings, profits, purchases of services, and a variety of other economic activities. Income to laborers is subsequently respent for purchases of food, housing, transportation, entertainment, education, medical and dental services, clothing, personal services, and a wide variety of other goods and services. Furthermore, income to governmental units is respent as salaries, purchases, and support of a variety of programs, including education, transportation, and social services. In turn, individuals, firms, and governments furnishing these goods and services again spend their income for more purchases, salaries, investments, and savings. In this manner, indirect benefits result each time the initial sum is respent, and the additional sum available in the local economy induces further job creation, business development and savings. Quantification of these indirect benefits has been the object of considerable economic study. Because economic relationships are so complex in our modern society, no single area or political unit is a completely self-contained economic unit. Therefore, purchases from other areas and political units are necessary, and goods and services are exported in return. As purchases are made from other units, some of the benefits of economic respending are lost to the local economy. Ultimately, a smaller and smaller portion of the initial sum would remain, until, after several rounds of respending, an insignificant sum is left. The indirect effects can be viewed as a set of "ripples" in the economy. Indirect, like direct, resources require labor, materials, equipment and services for their production to induce further job creation and spending of wages. MILLENNIUM TOWER - Economic Impact Study May 8, 1998 Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. Page 6 - " 86 INTRODUCTION, OBJECTIVES AND DEFINITIONS The "ripple" of the indirect effect multiplies the original impact of the purchase. The common measure of the magnitude of the "ripple" effect is called a multiplier. A multiplier measures the total magnitude of the impact on each particular economic indicator as a multiple of the initial, direct effect. For instance, a multiplier of " 1 " would signify no "ripple" effects as the total impact is 1 times the initial impact, while a multiplier of "2" would imply that the total impact is 2 times the direct effect. The actual magnitude of a multiplier depends on the likelihood the goods and services purchased in a region would be produced in, or provided from the region. The model we used to estimate the total economic impact incorporates a multiplier developed by utilizing past consumption and production patterns in the City. Measures of Economic Impact Various measures can be used to indicate the impact of a policy or project on a region. Specifically, for this study, they are the increases in local employment, wages, tax revenue and output that result. Definitions of these measures are as follows: • Employment is measured in full -time -equivalent jobs. • Wages include wages, salaries, and proprietors income only. They may include non -wage compensation, such as pensions, insurance, and other fringe benefits. Wages are assumed to be expended by households in the area at which the wage-earner works. • Local taxes include additional revenues from both ad valorem and non ad valorem assessments. MILLENNIUM TOWER - rc3nomic Impact Study May 8, 1998 Sharpton, Brinson & Company, P.A. Page 7 98- '786 INTRODUCTION, OBJECTIVES AND DEFINITIONS Measures of Economic Impact (Continued) • Direct Expenditures include those sums expended for land acquisition, site preparation and all hard and soft costs associated with a project. • Indirect Expenditures are those sums expended within the local economy as a result of the "ripple" effect described earlier. •Output describes total economic activity, and is essentially equivalent to the sum of direct and indirect expenditures (exclusive of wages and taxes). Description of Results For the purpose of describing the total economic benefits of the Project, the related expenditures have been broken into two categories: (1) Developmental (2) Operational Developmental expenditures include those expenditures related to the design and construction phase of the Project and related amenities. Operational expenditures are those expenditures incurred in connection with the ongoing operation of the Project. Expenditures by businesses leasing spaces in the Project are not included in this analysis in the interest of conservatism. MILLENNIUM TOWER - Economic Impact Study May 8, 1998 Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. Page 8 98- 786 MILLENNIUM TOWER THE PROJECT OVERVIEW 98- 786 PROJECT OVERVIEW The Project The Project includes a 286 room luxury hotel, a first class extended stay facility called the Phillips Club with 140 units, a 97,101 square feet sports club, 190 luxury residential units, 13,257 square feet of retail space and 236,833 square feet of office space. It is located on Brickell Avenue between 14th Terrace and 14th Lane in the City. Construction is expected to commence during the last quarter of 1998. The construction period is expected to be approximately 36 months. Occupancy of the constructed units is expected to begin in the fall of 2001. MILLENNIUM TOWER - Economic Impact Study May 8, 1998 Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. Page 9 MILLENNIUM TOWER DISCUSSION OF THE RESULTS BY ECONOMIC INDICATOR 98- 786 DISCUSSION OF THE RESULTS BY ECONONHC INDICATOR Impact Indicators We measured the Project's impact on four commonly -used indicators of economic activity. Those indicators are: • Jobs • Wages • Total output • Local taxes Results of Indicators !G11111, P 250000 0 200000 150000 100000 0 50000 0 Impact Indicators Direct Indirect Direct Indirect Developmental / Operational Annual Wages 0 Output 0 Taxes Exhibits I - III detail the Project's direct and indirect impact on the above economic indicators for Greater Miami. A summary of such impact follows: Development, One -Time Employment Wages Output Taxes Total Direct Indirect 350 $51,100,000 $267,321,325 229,443,968 $823,404 $319,244,729 229,443,968 Total Development Impact 1 350 1 $51,100,000 $496,765,293 $823,404 $548,688,699 Operational Annual Direct Indirect 480 1 $23,600,000 $18,400,000 17,781,760 $8,772,969 $50,772,969 17,781,760 Total Operational Impact 480 $23,600,000 $36,181,760 $8,772,969 $68,554-729 MILLENNIUM TOWER - Economic Impact Study May 8, 1998 Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. Page 10 98- 786 DIJCUSSION OF THE RESULTS BY ECONOMIC INDICATOR Results of Indicators (contd.) The economic indicator most commonly measured, and publicly reported on to gauge the economic impact of a public project is output. The impact of a project on the indicator output is often referred to as the project's economic impact. Impact of Construction: The site preparation and construction expenditures, estimated at $279 million including impact fees and the cost of models, will create approximately 350 new full time equivalent jobs and employ a maximum of 600 workers during peak periods. The workers will earn approximately $51 million in wages. These jobs will primarily be in the construction, transportation and related service industries. Spending for site preparation and project construction will result in a total estimated impact of $500 million dollars, excluding marketing and financing costs. Impact of Ongoing Operations As a result of the on -going operation of the hotel and the maintenance of the Project, Greater Miami will gain approximately 480 new, permanent, full-time equivalent jobs. The workers who obtain these positions will earn approximately $23.6 million annually. The total expenditures for the Project's operations will provide a new, permanent impact of $60 million annually to the City's economy. This impact consists of the effects of the direct expenditures from the maintenance and security of the Project, the day-to-day operation of the hotel, and the multiplied effects of such spending thus creating indirect benefits. Impact on Local Tax Revenues As a result of the construction and operation of the Project, various state, county, and city governments and agencies would gain a one-time tax revenue increase of approximately $823,000 and an estimated annual tax benefit of $8.8 million. The specific entities receiving these tax revenues are shown on page 16. MILLENNIUM TOWER - Economic Impact Study May 8, 1998 Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. Page 11 98- 786 DISCUSSION OF RESULTS BY ECONOMIC INDICATOR Our analysis of the economic and tax benefits of the Project was done by each major phase of the Project. We identified the major phases to be developmental and operational. This analysis determines the economic benefits to the City by identifying such benefits for each of the phases. The effect on economic indicators used to measure benefits (employment, wages, output and taxes) were computed for each phase. Employment Employment is one of the most important economic benefits of the Project. It is one of the most accessible and direct benefits for the City's residents and is a primary means by which developmental, operational and maintenance expenditures generate indirect economic benefits. A portion of this employment occurs on -site in the form of short-term development and marketing activity, and a portion is longer term employment derived from on -going operations. Further employment is generated off -site by expenditures of residents in area businesses. Additional on -site employment is a result of the on -going management of the Project and the daily operations of the hotel. As can be seen in Exhibit I, total short term (developmental) employment will average 350 employees over a 36 month period and the total on -going employment will average 480. The total on -going positions can be summarized as follows: • Leasing Staff • Management • Security/Police • Parking • Maintenance and Clean -Up • Hotel • Restaurants • Facilities MILLENNIUM TOWER - Economic Impact Study May 8, 1998 Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. Page 12 98- F ,S6 DISCUSSION OF RESULTS BY ECONOMIC INDICATOR From statistical data obtained from the Tourism Department, residents spending in the City of Miami is classified into various expenditure categories. These include: • Eating/Drinking • Grocery • Auto Rental Other Transportation • Service Station • Recreation • Retail Although it is known that these expenditures will be made, in the interest of conservatism, we did not include same in this report. We took this approach because we believe it would be difficult to assert that a majority of the patrons of this Project will come from out of town rather than other parts of the City or county. Wages The analysis deemed wages are a direct by-product of employment. As discussed in the above section, both on -site and off -site jobs are created. There were both temporary and permanent in nature. To compute the wages associated with the new employment we started with budgeted data directly related to the developmental and operational phases of the Project. Employment created, such as construction related employment, was obtained directly from construction estimates. These numbers were tested for reasonableness. MILLENNIUM TOWER - Economic Impact Study May 8, 1998 Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. Paa 13 98- S6 DISCUSSION OF RESULTS BY ECONOMIC INDICATOR Output Total output generated as a result of the development and operations of the Project is caused by the following type of expenditures. • Development costs expended in the City (100%) • Annual operational expenditures of management company and the hotel • New spending in Greater Miami by new residents, hotel guests and employees Exhibit II shows a summary of the development costs expended in Greater Miami and of operational expenditures made in relation to the on -going maintenance of the Project and operation of the hotel. Exhibit IV gives a detailed breakdown of the development costs. To incorporate the impact of dollars being respent and/or reinvested in the City, a multiplier was applied to total direct output. A multiplier of 1.9664 was used to determine total direct and indirect output created by the Project. This multiplier indicates that for every $100 spent in Greater Miami, another $96.64 will be respent or reinvested in Greater Miami. This multiplier was obtained from the Dade County Planning Department. Direct output from the developmental phase of the Project is primarily a result of developer costs. These costs include land acquisition, site preparation and soft and hard costs relating to the Project's construction. To determine the total direct output we determined what development costs were expected to be or had been spent in Greater Miami. Total direct output exclusive of wages during the development phase is $267 million. Total indirect output created by the direct respending in Greater Miami is $229 million. Thus total Greater Miami Output from the development of the Project is $496 million. MILLENNIUM TOWER - Economic Impact Study May 8, 1998 Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. Page 14 98- 786 DISCUSSION OF RESULTS BY ECONOMIC INDICATOR The final component of output results from the direct operating expenditures of the Project, and the indirect benefits created as a result of the multiplier effect on direct output. The Developer provided us with an annual operating budget for the Project. An overall assumption was made that all expenditures would be spent initially in the City. The total operating expenditures incorporate all estimated expenses of the ongoing operation of the Project excluding wages. The impact of wages was measured separately as an economic indicator. To incorporate the potential respending and reinvesting in Greater Miami, the multiplier effect was measured. By applying a multiplier of 1.9664 to the total direct output from operating expenditures, we determined total output (direct and indirect) from on -going operating expenditures. Total direct output created from operating expenditures is $18.4 million. Total indirect output created from operating expenditures is $17.7 million. Total output created from ongoing operations is approximately $36.1 million. Local Taxes A key and significant benefit generated from the development and operation of the Project is taxes. Several types of tax revenue will be generated from this project including ad valorem taxes. Specific ad valorem taxes include real and personal property taxes. Other taxes include occupational taxes, resort taxes and community development taxes. MILLENNIUM TOWER - Economic Impact Study May 8, 1998 Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. Page 15 DISCUSSION OF RESULTS BY ECONOMIC INDICATOR New real property taxes will be assessed on the Project. The assessment is based on a predetermined millage rate being applied to the taxable value of the real property. We computed real property taxes for the developmental phase based on the cost of the development of the Project. This assessment base is very conservative since tax on real property typically is assessed on appraised values and not actual cost. The basis for ongoing taxes is also overall cost. The millage rate was obtained from the County Tax Collectors office relative to the Project's location. Exhibit V shows the tax computation. The development phase real property taxes will amount to $274,469 each year over the three year construction period. The real property taxes expected to be generated annually are approximately $8.8 million. Total ad valorem taxes assessed by Dade County are allocated based on millage rates to certain governmental entities. Listed below is the allocation of projected tax revenue. Construction Period AW City Operating $86,395 $2,761,502 City Miscellaneous 4,500 143,836 Schools 84,204 2,691,453 County Operating 54,207 1,732,644 Debt Service - City 17,280 552,329 Debt Service - County 8,361 267,247 South Florida Water 5,373 171,740 Library Operating 2,844 90,904 School Debt Service 9,954 318,164 Florida Inland Navigation 450 14,384 Environmental Projects 900 28,767 11 Total $274,468 $8,772,970 Although not quantified, Greater Miami, through its receipt of allocated state sales taxes will receive an additional benefit as a result of the development and operation of the Project. MILLENNIUM TOWER - Economic Impact Study Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. May 8, 1998 Page 16 19 8 - 76 MILLENNIUM TOWER OTHER CONSIDERATIONS 9 786 OTHER CONSIDERATIONS Public Sector Costs When a community embarkes upon economic development which could involve increases in permanent residents, a major concern is the proper balance between the public sector revenues and the cost associated with the various forms this development may take. Public policy might seek to enhance development with beneficial net effects on the public sector, or at least avoid development having clearly adverse effects. Some of the costs that must be considered are required increases in the following: • Public Safety (police and fire) • Highways • Health and Environmental Services • Parks and Recreation • Capital Improvements (infrastructure) The objective of this report is not to measure the potential increases in public sector costs that may result from the development and operations of this project. Nor was this report's objective to compare the fiscal benefits with costs that may result from this project. Therefore we will not attempt to quantify such factors. We did feel it was necessary to make mention of certain potential fiscal costs that must be considered. Impact Fees A very significant factor in measuring the economic impact on a specific region of a project are impact and other required development fees. When a development occurs in the region being measured (Miami), specific fees must be paid to the region within which the development is to occur. A summary of the fees are listed below: • City of Miami Developmental Impact Fee • Administrative Fee • City of Miami Developmental Admin Fee • Building Permit Fee • Dade County Impact Fee • Installation Energy Fee • Other Fees For the purpose of this economic impact analysis, fees are included as a part of the direct development cost (output). Impact fees total approximately $2.3 million and other fees total approximately $1.3 million. These fees are shown in detail in Exhibit VII. MILLENNIUM TOWER - Economic Impact Study May 8, 1998 Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. 9 8 Page lay 8 6 EXHIBIT LIST Exhibit I Summary of Economic Impact Exhibit II Summary of all Direct Economic Benefits Exhibit III Computation of Indirect Benefits Exhibit IV Schedule of Project Development Cost Exhibit V Schedule of Ad Valorem Taxes Exhibit VI Allocation of Ad Valorem Taxes Exhibit VII Impact and Other Fees MILLENNIUM TOWER - Economic Impact Study May 8, 1998 Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. Page 18 • MILLENNIUM TOWER (Office/Hotel/Condo/Ex. Stay) ECONOMIC BENEFITS STUDY SUMMARY OF ECONOMIC IMPACT OUTPUT WAGES P..MPT.0VMRN'P rrAvVQ DTRE — - ------ DEVELOPMENTAL,;a $267,321,325 $51,100,000 386 $823,404 OPERATIONAL 18,400,000 23,600,000 480 8,772,969 TOTAL, ;DIRECT' . $285,721,325 $74,700,000 866 $9,596,373 DEVZLOPMENTAL =µ $229,443,968 OPERATIONAL 17,781,760 TOTAZ„NDTREGT $247,225,728 i F I TOTAL BSNE{FITS $532,947,053 $74,700,000 866 $9,596,373 H MILLENNIUM TOWER (Office/Hotel/Condo/Ex. Stay) ECONOMIC BENEFITS STUDY SUMMARY OF DIRECT ECONOMIC BENEFITS TAXES PHASE # OF EMPLOYEES WAGES DIRECT COST AD VALORUM DEVELOPMENT PHASE LAND $9,000,000 $823,404 PROJECT COST 374 $50,500,000 228,421,325 MARKETING 12 600,000 1,900,000 FINANCING COSTS 28,000,000 386 $51,100,000 $267,321,325 $823,404 SUB -TOTAL OPERATIONS PHASE 480 23,600,000 18,400,000 8,772,969 866 $74,700,000 $285,721,325 $9,596,373 TOTAL DIRECT BENEFITS cz Go W ro MILLENNIUM TOWER (Office/Hotel/Condo/Ex. Stay) ECONOMIC BENEFITS STUDY COMPUTATION OF INDIRECT BENEFITS TOTAL APPLICABLE COMPUTED INDIRECT DESCRIPTION EXPENDITURE MULTIPLIER BENEFIT DEVELOPMENT PHASE LAND SOFT COST HARD COST $9,000,000 0.9664 50,000,000 0.9664 178,421,325 0.9664 $8,697,600 48,320,000 172,426,368 $229,443,968 TOTAL DEVELOPMENT PHASE $237,421,325 0.9664 OPERATIONAL PHASE $18,400,000 0.9664 $17,781,760 $247,225,728 TOTAL INDIRECT BENEFITS I I rxj x H bd FA H H H FA MILLENNIUM TOWER (Office/Hotel/Condo/Ex. Stay) ECONOMIC BENEFITS STUDY PROJECT DEVELOPMENT COST TYPE OF COST SPENT IN DADE EXHIBIT IV AMOUNT HARD COSTS: BASE BUILDING / PARKING 100% $195,000,000 LAND 10006 9,000,000 IMPACT FEES 100% 2,379,694 PERMIT FEES 100% 1,291,630 SITE PREPARATION 1000 10,000,000 COST OF MODELS 1000 250,000 CONTINGENCIES 100% 20,000,000 TOTAL HARD COSTS BUDGETED SOFT COSTS PROJECT COST BEFORE FINANCING & MARKETING MARKETING COSTS FINANCING COST: FINANCING COSTS AND FEES TOTAL FINANCING COST ITOTAL PROJECT COST 10001 $237,921,325 10006 50,000,000 100% $287,921,325 100% 1 $2,500,000 1006 $25,000,000 1006 3,000,000 28,000,000 $318,421,325 98- 786 EXHIBIT V MILLENNIUM TOWER (Office/Hotel/Condo/Ex. Stay) ECONOMIC BENEFITS STUDY COMPUTATION OF AD VALORUM TAXES DESCRIPTION 1998-2000 2001 & Beyond REAL PROPERTY PER YEAR DEVELOPED PROJECT VALUE MILLAGE TAX RATE COMPUTED R/E TAX LAND $278,671,325 30.4965 $9,000,000 30.4965 $8,498,500 $9,000,000 30.4965 VALUE MILLAGE TAX RATE COMPUTED R/E TAX TOTAL PER YEAR $274,468 $274,469 $274,468 $8,772,969 98-- 786 MILLENNIUM TOWER (Office/Hotel/Condo/Ex. Stay) ECONOMIC BENEFITS STUDY ALLOCATION OF AD VALORUM TAXES DESCRIPTION City of Miami Operating City of Miami Miscellaneous Sch000l Operating Dade County Operating City of Miami Debt Dade County Debt South Florida Water Mgt. Dist. Library Operating School Debt Florida Inland Navigation Dist. Environmental Projects TOTAL 9* APPLICABL CONSTRUCTION PERIOD ANNUAL TAXES MILLAGE BASIS TAX BASIS TAX 9.5995 $9,000,000 $86,395 $287,671,325 $2,761,50 0.5000 $9,000,000 4,500 $287,671,325 143,836 9.3560 $9,000,000 84,204 $287,671,325 2,691,453 6.0230 $9,000,000 54,207 $287,671,325 1,732,644 1.9200 $9,000,000 17,280 $287,671,325 552,329 0.9290 $9,000,000 8,361 $287,671,325 267,247 0.5970 $9,000,000 5,373 $287,671,325 171,740 0.3160 $9,000,000 2,844 $287,671,325 90,904 1.1060 $9,000,000 9,954 $287,671,325 318,164 0.0500 $9,000,000 450 $287,671,325 14,384 0.1000 $9,000,000 $9,000,000 900 $274,468 $287,671,325 $287,671,325 28,767 $8,772,970 30.4965 A MILLENNIUM TOWER (Office/Hotel/Condo/Ex. Stay) ECONOMIC BENEFITS STUDY IMPACT AND OTHER FEES IMPACT AND OTHER FEES EXHIBIT VII . Development Square Footages: ISquare Footage 1) Total gross building area (with parking) 2,444,126 2) Maximum development area (FAR) 1,357,669 3) Hotel FAR 251,978 4) Office FAR 234,967 5) Condo FAR 585,821 6) Extended Stay FAR 161,900 7) Retail Service FAR 111,266 8) Lobby area 11,737 9) Gross parking area 400,000 JB. Impact Fees: 1) City of Miami Development Impact Fee (Ord. 10426) 2) City of Miami Development Impact Admin. Fee 3) Downtown Development Supplemental Fee (Ord. 10461) 4) Dade County School Impact Fee Total of all Impact Fees IC. Non -Impact Fees: 1) Miami Dade W.A.S.A. "connection fees" 2) Building Permit Fee 3) Installation Energy Fee 4) Re -plat (legal & Survey) 5) Major Use Special Permit Application Fee 6) Dade County Code Compliance 7) Radon Gas Fee 8) Fire Plan Review Fee 9) Ground Cover Fee 10) Land Use/Zoning 11) Zoning Review for Building Permit Fee 12) Certificate of Occupancy Fee 13) Application Fee Total of all Non -Impact Fees Total of all Fees for Project Amount $1,176,239 35,287 528,626 639,540 $2,379,694 $586,517 351,534 175,767 20,000 30,000 97,500 8,788 16,873 2,676 1,630 60 250 35 $1,291,630 3,671,324 Source: City of Miami Planning, Building and Zoning Department, April 23, 1998. 98- 786 TERREMARK BRICKELL II N/K/A MILLENNIUM TOWER Amendment to MUSP SURVEY OF PROPERTY May 8,1998 98- 786 Ly. Y 1 t, y tt �I t iFF 1 •� • I Jl' (N. I x �y Ir. 7 i W I I 1 W I I 0 I I 8 I 9 I _ 1 I glis I Is .� SO I FI] 1 it R Y�At 12 i -1 I Y , I cc TO 11 r (I!l p-I i CIIA I A RESUBDIVISION OF BLOCK 1, AMENDED PLAT PLAT OF POINT VIEW (PB 2 PG 93) SECTION 39. TOWNSHIP 54 SOUTH, RANGE 41 EAST POLLY LEWIS DONATION. CITY OF MIAMI DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA 1NE."WO 91 E.R. BROWNELL L ASSOCIATES, IINCC1.. CD15NSI TIN. VIq IIEEIr IMA ' 1 f1, ))�SltPIrON[CCr1105) t6.3511 YIf*. �3051 •�•-3011 SCALE: 1' - /O• A110YST 1297 50 0 10 1w ISO ORAWIIC SCALE ( TRACT 'A' I' / TRACT 'A' (Pb /46 P6 991 ,\ FORTE PLAZA fPB 96 PO all I ST. JAWS AT BRICYELL -__________ r__-__-__ _ L______ ______ __ - To SE 14th TERRACE sR N'VI vtY it k I it � II !' by WI t IY I IY1f R I r •i. \ -oil ,,VNE. •. \ ill C, To fl ■ TRACT A ) 112 IMS •l I G. I 31 t u ' / p a / N Is r• 1 1• X T J / � - jt li'NY r1<IYI IIfRI \ x 1 ._ R urtr vtIS SE xN 14th LANE N � __- T LOT 15 BLOCK 2 I TRACT A I TRACT A \ SOB117 \\ DEVELOPMENTso IAMENDED O6 POIVIENI EAST (MPBCKELL 1 B6R SOB. COSTA VELLA /D , S PLAT I POINT I tiweTALs OEIYEI00 IOIES IrWS 4.11llr dal! (IIIrYI. ■ f.l 1TTallf IIrYI[iT1YfI[p1411YI1Y1 cm a nwl IYrs R•1 Nr ■4A1 IY , p4411r 1A 1N Il YI 1 Y. "N l A IN Yl"It. rkSl[ At .It IY:W .N .IYI Y :la 1•u•:rY IA [IIY1Tr'S <I.IIfNNIr Rr plw I Nf MtCY1f M I :IwN•K 1.... • I L .. ia11S RNYE,I frli N1YI Y rank LIII 1 YIMI NRIEYI Y.Itf11P6 p YDIIt. t• Is 1. 1.. rY I r P INS4f uY ,NrTY Ir N t I fY11Y1fllr O Y1 W IIa1W.I�is ... AW a- A ov91 0P ,At4ak. IN . 61r NN IN W[R 1 YTN .. .Ir 1 .... .... .... ....... . 1rr Y NI rolr YE X. « (1. M[ss ukg14 NYr all aliD ropR111W1 41 W r.11/ iA,lk lRl'L pL.IwpS IT IYIS [WYIY 9IEI1Fr9I0 ON, Q9r1E k rre Xnwr. lal as rlro Ru minu '"Am,ago'. r 1 `19`lI( i�i11aI w1Sa m .E` a 9Yi.pr`t i`.a1w 1 meal sole NAMANDA, KIUNIrl O MYIs.44 NOW [I Iw Ih Rt•yl N IYpE M 1 I C lu ir. Ai �il� So, Ndrrltii uuu .... . __..-. I. -A. Il1l11. 1. 11.1 IIYI rlf R11 •NIM I. Cold 1 NNW pRYIs 1 t11 IN Y1M 11Y IIOf [•wlr tltl tt 1 f0 S WI P IY. tlll 1 Yirl tilt YO.IirPi�ii[�Itw«a I[raarafnw 920E teen ualmus If 1t 11 W.II« S I M113 RII YY(W N:w IN Y YI 1 IN 4W14 Y.IIt W 1 lNr1Y X 1 IN CAM, I., [w t[Y1IIr1Y 4is -. ... WI 1r. t[_ olNtra MYN Y.'�11rR YYiI1.R(N S1.10 1.rW...$ lG .mr X.. ITT,. Y 11•t If RIIS 11 .,1[ R11 N 11r1t IiiiEu Y Sod 11. rlriAolds N I iP•lll5 r1q w lus rr IN suY r nw1W Y9 rlMnr tIrT1, nalu 41Y 1I t-I add P. B. PG. SHEET 1 OF I G19Y uI n n[a rESEnf •1 •IIpEYw rltru 111.' tta1W IIY"to"kaYlr. YY WYII 1, Ip1Y�1Y1IN 1 INWN rllN�r Wlair. IYYl1I tuY' M 'WE rli LE(fW �lfAIPTIOE INS I IIIInY 2. IICIY1p. lrY L II- IIIY 1" l [If r•I[. Y 1rM YAT Y RIr 14 wa(. MIT Y NWOf(AMEN-11 "IV ,mlolr If w _1tb111 1101. Ulf IM L110 W IfIN Al l=a RIMY 1 M1If MI 1{ N 4.1[. YYLI[. •r1W91 M .Ie.TIYW f rlilRY11il If gI `[fXII /rN 1Y IN. IT,) NIYAIf YI[, OwE falEln n tcsmlcnae N INYE YE M T(Y•E Y SIM Y ro I Nm R•1 N[11E. YI III tll t.1f11N li. m ..117 Il[E Y" E lY M EIY YIYIYtf leer M1S .Ko, r1141[I Y IN Ii1R1Yl w • 11[ 11.It IN, IRYRR RIOYT pY.Ila a la K.- ! 4RWxa/ a MIM 1 NNI. ■ r*Nl/. INRW rE1.rf .1YrPIY.f fr la No a1«WY rllf I r pN«IY x1AIY lul Rf.Ir1Ya [r(n rr Ed, Nl{ INUIa"' VISIT* Iwr Ir IMIRMN a VIA B. Y.T1t Iwf NI r kr nor . 11YM1 IYIS S •I_s E l-I -6 sYi itaYIYY W YtaoYQ YliYialYlln roa 1w15 fkiiYl I'=tSAMil`I[ Ilui¢iu uQSYYc or1 lYa.lss•r IINs. "I"' IM 91TIESt OEROr, IN Sld. 'If•YYW a1<tlIl I N'. r al. lNllf..r"N".. rk I,rl. Ik4 REW.11 to SE s141f 11i li. M 11f rYY/ Ir'11w,YY aIW« 1 Ir •. • IIUW fMul,Il If YtlAY IMTrI IN, 11f tR.11L111 IT IN, �1Y�oifetir; . w • e 1 M11s IAWA.WW a Y II I « yrlY I I,I I11 , WN .r Iw. ...... INNIA. 1 .rIM SYt 1J �,�(Qj�.lWlly3 11'[SI riwJlf t �ili. i[giMi fo:,lIF W ,V d NN.' 4A1111 IWI r 1.1{ III Nrrllll YRw. WIw k r 1Ir. ur w11 R. T. p.1N11[. rro M Iw YO/afOWYl& YI�AI A KWN M YIY, . YNYIM Ipslea M WO.-tfRtllElr to •rY[Yw auuu a W, 11,a10, (Mull. M WrY /rlk. 1 • [YFrW 1041111. 11 1.0 •. , rlalr u.uN IWNIIWW. 0 IL M9 ', We Ir. rRY.W9. «- Y 1r.«Gt1j1 III W [k[YIf1 IN trLYlr I.-M. 111.rWl IYN Y•�:YTM.l 0,1 La1 tl«IfN fol IN Y,..NO11Ws NNI. i,kxbn rYY M 111[lY 4Y IY1f ?['�: WI I yt}I�•....- IWN NM1NI YY[ .NnYYiwi •' '. I ilaris a :Ar1� r` ci: a� � 'YYI I IliI kA .Y INY MYYIS 1,11'Wfa1Rl111YwIY. L I'll plNw r kYYII RNY M wrY Y I,IT fIRr1,1, It • 1 11 w Ir1 IMIN ��:n sIM1A IONI. rtoi1W YI`onislrii irvill if M11s R11 YY 11N 1Y Ir - u.1t N11Y N .11k5S NNI •wlNlpfl f1,w1Y. l r • rlrw 1 IYII[. .NIkWYI.. Yk I_s iNY X IS 11 W 11W91r AN r ITS r„ 1.1•at[aw[I YYWY[ N' r IK. W ""Nos glsjt Mll(MYY„Y,MI.oY k1Y ,1 N .do YY •11if1[o ill, IYNIa11t1.YYiwrlll�`IINM`st IWr.Nx1. S1tk fpu I:N SSff 1 ..('... '/RtYY Wtll1 . uY, -11 1 UN 11 I WNU W.IIII' IYII B11.4 W, .-II NNwT, rlrl k. AK.11r. YI ,-.No 1. N 4M. Y.. M 'Nor YpRllf..YL fl[I. I[[. M All.' SAT-K N[SIrYI MIT SEEN_ 1Rpr11Nt, 1 YQNINIT WNYN.I IN • Ykrl .r ... 0 "I L41 M1IMa,1[pN wui IILII IMTr41IlI, ••wl wn .All1r.Or r•na Wwo. OOS Y 1.IIIN.YSo -if`.IIll1Y IIIrW[.IIN "No"l.l . w NIIMIM Ya R IrY R .Ia As -- A .. IN, YI NIRIYIN IWI �1�rLm .�•....._ NIMN .w 11lYNNfW !1 m ro;Isa wNS ".ifli,..0 TERREMARK BRICKELL II N/K/A MILLENNIUM TOWER Amendment to MUSP PROJECT CRITERIA AND DRAWINGS May 8,1998 • TERREMARK BRICKELL II N/K/A MILLENNIUM TOWER LIST OF DRAWINGS FAR-1.0 Ground Floor Site Plan - FAR Calculations FAR- 1.1 Basement Level Plan - FAR Calculations FAR-1.2 Second Level Plan - FAR Calculations FAR-1.3 Third Level Plan - FAR Calculations FAR-1.4 Fourth Level Plan - FAR Calculations FAR-1.5 Fifth Level Plan - FAR Calculations FAR-1.6 Sixth Level - FAR Calculations FAR-1.7 Hotel Function Floor Plan - 7th level - FAR Calculations FAR-1.8 Hotel Back of House - 8th Level - FAR Calculations FAR-1.9 Mechanical Floor Plan - 9th Level - FAR Calculations FAR- 1.10 Office Floor Plan - 10th thru 17th - FAR Calculations FAR- 1.11 Mechanical Floor Plan - 18th Level - FAR Calculations FAR- 1.12 Typical Hotel Floor Plan - 19th thru 31 st - FAR Calculations FAR- 1.13 Tyical Phillips Club Floor Plan - 32nd thru 41 st - FAR Calculations FAR- 1.14 Residential Floor Plan - 42nd thru 78th - FAR Calculations L-1.0 Ground Floor Landscape L-2.0 Hotel Function Landscape Plan - 7th Level L-3.0 Roof Top Garden - 8th Level A-0.1 Context Site Plan A-1.0 Ground Floor Site Plan A-LOA Ground Floor Site Plan - Bank Drive-Thru Option A-1.1 Basement Level Plan A-1.2 Second Level Plan A-1.3 Third Level Plan A-1.4 4th Level Plan - Lower Sports Club A-1.5 5th Level Parking A-1.6 6th Level Plan - Upper Sports Club A-1.7 Hotel Function Floor Plan - 7th Level A-1.8 Roof Deck Floor Plan - 8th Level A-1.9 Mechanical Floor Plan - 9th Level A-1.10 Office Floor Plan - IOth thru 17th A-1.11 Mechanical Floor Plan - 18th Level A-1.12 Typical Hotel Floor Plan 19th thru 31st A-1.13 Typical Phillips Club Floor Plan - 32nd thru 41st A-1.14 Residential Floor Plan - 42nd thru 53rd A-1.15 Residential Floor Plan - 54th thru 78th A-6.0 West Elevation A-6.1 East Elevation A-6.2 North Elevation 98- 786 A-6,3 South Elevation A-7.0 Building Section A-7.1 Building Section A-7.2 Building Section A-7.3 Building Section 98- 786 MILLENNIUM TOWER M HMMMIC WCULL 11 BERMELLO, AJAMIL HANDEL JOINT VENTURE BERMELLO, AJAR & PARTNERS, INC. ARCHITECTURE, IAmw-APE ARCHITwrm CIVIL ENGINEERING, & INTERIOR DESIGN 2601 SOUTH BAYSHORE DRIVE, SUITE IM MAK FLORIDA 33M (30MM 005990 FAX GARY EDWARD HANDEL & ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS S95 BROADWAY, 41H FLOOR NEW YORK, NY 10023 (212b954M (2] SS-M FAX OFFICE OF DAN IOLEY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS EAST FARM, CRAM TI& VIRMONT 05445 (80XZ-241 (0425-3m FAX DESI 40NE CONSULTING ENGINEERS STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS 20 WATERM FWA, NEW Y= NW YORK No (-2 o7J481 aos FAx HUFSEY NICOLAIDES GARCIA SUAREZ CONSULTING ENGINEERS 10250 SW. 56 STREET, SUM B-2% MMU FLOR M W (3DSM-W ( OMM-2256 MAY 89 1998 URBAN DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 0u / Vdl ON pUhl w E a N oo 'S O I N a I it a a E / 0 N i v E E o / B t� 4 ®���4�404.00044®444,� 4 -JL i V FAIII�II�IIII' i 7 I / I © I i __ -- -- ,IIIIIIIIIIII�J I I O 1j 4TH LEVEL PLAN — eARi _ SCALET-27-0- FLOOR AREA RATIO LEGEND FAR 46,653 S.F. ® NON -FAR 85,564 S.F. INT VENTURE ICHITECTS: 3MELL0•AJAMIL NDEL JOINT VENTI IMELLO-AJAMIL PARTNERS-INC .e CeEl.ee.1.E neem.E PoWrIP lee4np A1cpNwWn Ee. a•fvpero Drin loon nenee avJJ ME-1mE PAY (MS) ESE-PEJE iY EDWARD.HANDEL 1SSOCIATES Broee.eP, {tp Fleer 'erk NY IDOEJ AE-{IlE PAY (EIE) SBS-EWY NER: EMARK BRICKELL H LTD. ride IImINd Pertnenplp) 3. BePep.n Orin rtathan Torremerk BrlekeD 11 e c.r9enue.) Iry s.P.pon orl.. t Gnra, vl.lns J31JJ SE-JmE .Y A. BERNELLO, R.A. ARCHITECT REG, NO: AR 0007200 LLENNIUM i W E R NEY PLVI Comm. No. 9890.000 � S.0- Dete: - 05/08/98 Dnwo: SH Ch..ked: ve CARD M.: SF wTSrA4P me" nu.: 4TH LEVEL PLAN - LOWER SPORTS CLUB - F.A.R. CALCULATIONS se.a Ne. NORTH FAR-1.4 N U 1 1.9 1.8 2 9 4 5 8 J 15'A' 15'-0' 18'•O' 15'•0' ll'-0' ib'-O' 18'•O� IS'-0' 18'-0' i 15'•0' J 16'•0' T 15'-0' ; 15'•0' T 16'•0' T 27'-8' T 25'-6' T 2� 5'•6 25'-6- 25'-6' 25'-8- 26'-6' 261 25' 6- 8 E I 1 4 I, 6 T E Ill It A CIE — .. — .. — .. — .. — .. — . 4 R \ R taxPARKIN JL�J10TIL1110U7A OR "0 EL Illltlllll m 111tttJJJ11111111 "' II I I I I I I OPEN b I I I I I � I I � I I I I L___ I I I 8 E 1 4 t A L A N E B FLOOR AREA RATIO LEGEND FAR 0 S.F. ® NON -FAR 64,543 S.F. JOINT VENTURE ARCHITECTS: SE RMELLO - AJAMIL HANDEL JOINT VENTURE SERMELLO-AJAMIL & PARTNERS-INC 6reWleetun e.el.eeaee Plemty mYN.r 0.dp leeYnye dreut.rw�. 9601 9e. Be7eGow Orlre SuIU t600 YlemL flerWe DOlee (d06) 650-pVo PNI (.65) eoo-Dees GARY EDWARD HANDEL & ASSOCIATES A .bl..te to. br-d..P, ...l New York NY t0oe2 (ets) sss-nte Pex (sul sss-uns OWNER: TERREMARK BRICKELL II LTD. U novae um"1 Perd.-11P) GMmi Pertuma i rr�I Nr1eoW N (A Ptorlde CorporeUo.) 2", s. BefeEore Drive N.Weu- 1 Cee..ut crew, fl.o-ae 09I00 (saa) _-sego 0 W)LLY A. HERMELLO, R.A. FL. ARCHITECT REG. NO: AR 0007200 aweo.� Projacl NomLe: M I L E N N I U M TOWER ny PLVV Comm. X.. 9020=0 9cele: AS SHOWN Dete: 05/06/96 Drawn: 5B CEeck— VB CADD Pile: SEE OAY MP 0'.w'S nu.: 5TH LEVEL PARKING F.A.R. CALCULATIONS Se..t N.. FAR-1.5 98- 786 E / I� is 1.s n n n i a w n >zQ uQ to n >an z1 zz zs n 15'-0' SCALE:r-2a-,7 FLOOR AREA RATIO LEGEND FAR 56,970 S.F. NON -FAR 10,078 S.F. JOINT VENTURE ARCHITECTS: BERMELLO'AJAMIL HANDEL JOINT VENTL BERMELlO•AJAMIL & PARTNERS-INC A.om1..a.r. 9.9m..nv9 1a...m9 mk.w o•+v m.a...p. Arttimnw 28m Bo. B.Y.e.ro 811 . iD00 Y1em1, -or,a. ­M(5ro) B59-m5o FAX p951 859-9a0p GARY EDWARD HANDEL & ASSOCIATES AneI1.m. 19" Brwaw.y. aW nl N.w York NY 1002a (M) 595-1112 PO (212) 595-M OWNER: TERREMARR BRICRELL 11 LTD. 200, S. aBe7.p.na D111. elp) (A Plerld_ c.:k Br1aY.D it pm .e) z 1 a. B.P.e.n Dn A ) c..o..1 cnn, neo-a. aalaa (a95) Sae-9so5 E.4 0 IC4 WILLY A. BERMELLO, R.A. FL. ARCHITECT REC. N0: AN 0007200 Rmri.iona: Pr.j.ci Nam.: M I L L E N N I U M T O W E R IdVY PLW Comm. No. 9820.000 U.1.: AS SHOWN D.W: 05/08/98 Dn : SB Ce.ck.d: VB CADD fl1.: Sa OAY9IA D, a TIU.: GTH LEVEL PLAN - UPPER SPORTS CLUB - F.A.R. CALCULATIONS Be..1 N., NOFITH FAR-1.6 N 7.3 7� 1.6 7b'•0' 2 16'•0' 3 15'-0' 414'-0.5 16'-0' 6 15'-0' 7 16'-0' 9 15'-0'p t5'-0' 16'-0' 2r-6• �1 -- -- R E 1 t t h LAN E 8 C-) SCALE:[*-2a-a FLOOR AREA RATIO LEGEND FAR 10,626 S.F. ® NON -FAR 57,542 S.F. 2s•-6• 26•-e• �, 25'-S' 25•-6• 26'-6' 26'-6• T JOINT VENTURE ARCHITECTS: SERMELLO•AJAMIL HANDEL JOINT VENTURE SERMELLO•AJAMIL & PARTNERS-INC Anhllecluro [.YI.NrIy Pl.m.l.Y IeYelar U-tlp I.•Au.M Arthp.qun PA91 8e. 6.P.hero Drhe BWM 1000 Y].ml, FlerfA. p818p (80A) B5.-AAp PA% (YOA) !'A-Y/DB GARY EDWARD HANDEL & ASSOCIATES Arohltwt. 1Y9s er-A.v..m no.r New Y.Nr. NY 3e028 (Yl¢) 015-1]IY PA[ (Elt) 6.0-909Y OWNER: TERREMARK 6RICKELL II LTD. (A -,id. PmR.d P.M h1p) ao i rm.�..�Y: :m:rw 6r1ek.1] n — A (A flerW. Cery.nW.) 8YD] & 6.P,hen Drlrs P-hauw 1 � C.vevut Grow. FIeW. ]Y]93 (b0) !IY-YY00 b e W E.4 II � I: I0 — K4 WILLY A. BERMELLO, R.A. FL. ARCHITECT REC. NO: AR 0007200 II 4 M I L L E N N I U M T 0 W E R IU:1' PLAx c.mm. x.. 98zo.ow s.s]e: As snowx Oala: o5/05/98 Dro : 56 Cheeketl: Vs CMD FYI.: SEE DAYSTAYP Dr..1 Titi.: HOTEL BACK OF HOUSE PLAN - STH LEVEL - F.A.R. CALCULATIONS sh..e x.. NORTH FAR-1.8 JOINT VENTURE ARCHITECTS: BERMELLO -AJAMIL HANDEL JOINT VENTURE t 7.3 7.6 2 3 4 5 �\ 6 ( I ti 12 13 14 15 16 77 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Q 25 BERMELLO•AJAMIL 6 PARTNERS-INC Emwl W _ V, pl= w..oa.a 1$'-D' 15'-0" 15'-0' 15'-0' 14'-O' 18'-0' 19'-O" 15'-0• 16'-0' 15'•0' 75'-0" _ IS'•O' 15'-O• IS'A' 18'•8' 27'-8' 25'-8' 28'-6' 25'-8' 25'-8' 25'-6" 25'-8" 2$'•6' 25'•8' 26'-8' a DW L.Emeeno. EHOI Bo. B.nhoro DN.. W.m4lnaw. �1 ii'(--1— ��� calm (xs) ro9-aaao vu fsro) esP-9ese GARY EDWARD HANDEL a A SSOCIATES I I I I I I S E 14 h 1 T E RJR A CIE I I I I I Ae.he °BYrIODp, veer M I I I I I I I I I I I I YmK (EIE) m-_ I I OWNER: \ -- _R R TERREMARK ONCKELL 11 LTD. j -- — — 49a_95' _ — — — — — — — — � \ (1 P". YB01 S. B.phor• DHp Pe 1p))sE \ Tar 11 (A Po M Cmper� eB)r 's' _ Pptheup 1 o.e.o, rmha. 3E133 c806) E61-xiCD C t c I-V� E T —I—�—�444 f— } 4 --- - •" — • K4 WiLLY A. BERMELLO, R.A. FL. ARC HCT N0: 0007200 MG. N 1 rt I i-1—lrtrtrt I I I I I I i I I � — it lI� I� — �� Project Nome: M I LLENNIUM ii TOWER / w — — _ — — — — — — — 498.82' — — —_ _----BB6— Lltl KEY P o I m I 5 E 1 4 t h l A N E EL.•no m � l— _L _(L1— � � s rn I z Q / 1 ' 1 / Comm. Ne. 9890.000 S.ele: AS SHOWN O.L.: OS/OB/98 Dr.eD: SB 0 N FLOOR AREA RATIO LEGEND Ch-4: NB CARD File: SEE OAVSTAAIP FAR 0 S.F. D' 'g MI,: MECHANICAL E ® NON -FAR 30,457 FLOOR PLAN 9TH E D U LEVEL - F.A.R. / CALCULATIONS 0 1 MECHANICAL FLOOR PLAN - 9TH LEVEL - FA.R. CALCULATIONS / ARi,9 SCALE:I'•20r-0' NORTH FAIR(- 9 F S._Z U � 1.3 1.6 2 3 4 S 8 7 9 X1 11 12 p 14 15 ffi A 1Q m 200 21 22 23 24 2S 28 . _ 15'-OQ75'-OQ15'AQ75'-0Q14'A�16'•0�14'-OQ15'-OQ15'•0Q15'-0" 15'-0" IS'-0' 15'-0' iS'•0' 15'-0' 27'-6' 25'-6' I 25'•6' � 26'•6' L 2S'-6' 25'•5' 25'-5' 25'-6' 25' 6' � 25. 5• I l l l I I I I I I I I I I f FLOOR AREA RATIO LEGEND FAR 25,600 S.F. IX 8 FLOORS 204.800 S.F.) ® NON -FAR 4,857 S.F. (X 8 FLOORS 38,856 S.F.) JOINT VENTURE ARCHITECTS: BERMELLO' AJAMIL HANDEL JOINT VENTURE SERMELLO•AJAMIL d PARTNERS-INC Arthll«lun Dpel. ;f PI 11 letel•r akl2. I..arup ArtEX.eWn 2801 !•. B•Frhon 0m. W.. Pima. (m) PIw1d. a ( - (2w) eat -taw Pax (aw) we-9aae GARY EDWARD HANDEL & ASSOCIATES lrebhrcU 1905 RroWwq. {w Flo.r Ns. Y.rk NY 10020 (112) Me-.112 - (M) aw-was OWNER: TERREMARK BRICKELL 11 LTD. (A FI.rh1. Ismlt•d P•M1n.nhlp) se01 9. 9.xM.ro Drly. GI A P•rb•n iYn.m•rk 9r1•YeD II Flerld• Capporatl.v) 2eoT a. e.Y•h.r. once Pwlheun 1 C..•vul Drvr•, FIeW Dal3a (anal ace-awo 0 WILLY A. BERMELLO, R.A. FL. ARCHITECT REG. NO: AR 0007200 R.visi0ns: Proj.ct N.m.: M I LLENNIUM T 0 W E R )MY PLO Comm. N.. 9920... S...: AS $MOWN D. 05/08/98 Dr— SB Checked: " CADD F11.: SEE wY5 _P Dr ', Till.: OFFICE FLOOR PLAN 10TH - 17TH - F.A.R. CALCULATIONS Sh..t N.. FAR-1.10 N E U 13 16 �2 3 4 5 1s•-oQis'-o--t's•-oQs•-o• 1a•-o• 1s•-o• 6 Q7 9 7p i1 Is•-o" ` 15'-D• 15'-0• 15'-O• 12 13 M 105 75 T7 (�) (�) ( ts•-D• 15'-O• 18'-O' 18'A' L 18' 0' 27' e' 2s' 6• 28' B' 25'-e' j ) 23 24 25 26 26'-e• ~'lJ 2s�'-8' ! ! I I ! I I ! ! I I ! 2S'-e• 28'-8• 26'-e• I ! ! ! ! ! I I I ! ! I ! ! ! ( I ! ! ! I ! S E ! 111 h ! T E III. A CIE I ! ! TT_M--1 ! I -- - - - ------- ----- O O \ 4Y m ! ! I I O -Z ----I -_-_-_ __— — —BB6 _ 8 S E 1 d l h L A N E 1�1 FLOOR AREA RATIO LEGEND FAR 0 S.F. ® NON -FAR 30,457 JOINT VENTURE ARCHITECTS: BERMELLO•AJAMIL HANDEL JOINT VENTURE BERMELLO•AJAMIL & PARTNERS-INC Arebli«te E.Ely AM PI. M I. - oedp Labe" Artbb.e5un a.. too. lee4 Flerld. aB M (Eos) aye-mM — (m5) me -Peas GARY EDWARD HANDEL & ASSOCIATES A bli v 1995 Brosdw.P, 4W Flem Nww Yerk NY 1oo(9 (ElY) MS-lIIE PAT (EIE) 595-moY OWNER: TERREMARK BRICKELL 11 LTD. (A Fi rid. Ileled Per{ve ,) Yaot e. e.nbor. Drn. Gv.�1rtv.e Teer.rk BAekeO 11 Cmporet..lev) not a. Bq,bvn wt.. P.mbwe. 1 tvvovul Deere, Ple4de aBtae (Eoe) a68 9Eop WILLY A. BERMELLO, R.A. FL. ARCHITECT REG. N0: AR 0007200 F=iaivni� Project Name: MILLENNIUM T O W E R KEY PW Comm. No. otiM DD U.I.: AS SHOWN D.le: 05/08/98 Draw: 58 Cbxked: VB CARD Fh,: Sa DAY All Dnw'a Ti— MECHANICAL FLOOR PLAN 18TH LEVEL - F.A.R. CALCULATIONS Sb..t No. FAR-1.11 r s E 1 L Q1.3 1.6 2 3 4 b 6 7 9 W Q11 Y2 Q3 14 Q5 16 17 1E 19 20 21 22 23 24 I S'-OQS'-OQS'-OQS'-OQ74'-0QiD'-O' iS'-0' 15'-0' 15'-0Q1S'-O' 1 15'-0• 15'-0' L� A' 15'A' 118'-0' 27'-S• 25' 6' 25' S' 25' 6' 23' 0' T 2� 5' S_ 2b 6 25 A 25 S I I I I I I i I I I I I I I. I I I I ISE 114Jh ITERJRACIE T t T T L -I- I- \ c _ L IL L L L L L I_ - � �44-1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 � I I (ul .1 1 1 1 1 �� ----------------- 498.82'-- I I- - I -- I - - L - L 1 S E 1 4 t h L A N E E FLOOR AREA RATIO LEGEND FAR 16,119 S.F. (X 13 FLOORS 209,547 S.F.) HOTEL GUEST FLOOR ® NON -FAR 1,947 S.F. (X 13 FLOORS _ 25,311 S.F.) SCALE:1120'O' �EeiM —:SWI HOTEL Wf OMAKDOTRI PLOOM UNTO PER Wl Ild FLOOR i Ye H-L w MJ MJ N-t a p e0 • ep I a H-T s N-E H• N.n wa 141 eµilu N•16 A M AIe Re AM Y of N Y f 1 m T al. As. a HH TOTTAAI, is to as a a PE a a a Z• a a a a a l"T TOTAL 20 JOINT VENTURE ARCHITECTS: SERMELLO•AJAMIL HANDEL JOINT VENTI BERMELLO • AJAMIL & PARTNERS-INC Arcltltel — l=.; y Pl,= letabr I p Lo4ery grLll,nun Ye91 0 1alwtlen Drlw ... Do Hanes .1.(--) 9YR) aal-ZD10 PI2 (>p5) a3P-Haa GARY EDWARD HANDEL & ASSOCIATES Arepllecte (N 1 Dlk. K.Y, 1� Fl11r N1e Yerk NY . ( (21Y) SYS-IIIE P1i (EIY) 616-PW¢ OWNER: TERREMARK ORICKELL It LTD. (A Mne1 um PeM —p) 211 P;M1lwnwnlDlrle) a BrIeYeD 11 A Hend1 C1 Mal 9. al btl DN.1 Pee ... I C0000ut 9w.1, Pb 33— (M) aM-- 0 WILLY A. BERMELLO, R.A. FL. ARCHITECT REG. NO: AR 0007200 F=iPans� P,.j- N.— MILLENNIUM TOWER Cemm. K.. 9920.000 9cete: AS SN0" Date: 05/Oe/9s Dre m: SB Cbached: ve CADD M.: SEE DAY _p Drew'8 ntle: TYPICAL HOTEL FLOOR PLAN 1971H - 31ST - F.A.R. CALCULATIONS spelt n1. FAR-1.12 786 1.3 1.8 2 3 4 18'-0' 15'•O' 15'-0' 15'-O' 15'-0' 15'-0' 15'-0' 15'-0' 15'-0' 18'•0' 27'-8' 25'-6- [ 2W-6- I 25--6' 1, 25'-6- I 25'-6- 1. 25'-6' 1 25'-6' T 25' 6' i I I I I! I I I I 15E I ,4�h ITERIRACIE I I I I I I I I I I F F61t — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — -- — — — — — — D JT 1 f— ■ --■ f— — ■ ° +— L I— o I L I— L L L LI_ —I +1 —1—I—E444 w 1 -11—t—f I I I I 1-1_f_tfifi I I I II PNl1l6 CLOD UNIT 6REAKDOWK FLOOM YNITB Il[R PY.I .ors ` IM-f PO.64 Fu 1NJ•7 �-6 RODR w s e[P [F ens er - 02e4 O 4Lt FY 10 1 t 1 / 1 / 1 1 t PMLLWS CLIw UMT TOTAL K1 p KI 10 10 10 X7 10 TM CLOD 100 1 I L��— I I LL-----M — — — — — — — — R— S E 1 4 t h L A N E / 8 FLOOR AREA RATIO LEGEND FAR 16,504 S.F. (X 10 FLOORS _ 165,040 S.F.) ® NON -FAR 1,547 S.F. (X 10 FLOORS = 15,470 S.F.) JOINT VENTURE ARCHITECTS: BERMELLO-AJAMIL HANDEL JOINT VENTURE BERMELLO-AJAMIL & PARTNERS-INC Anhlleetun ft..eu1.[ N." Y1ala Yedy 4vbnp ArtE11Mun E[Ol 9.. BePepen B�fie 6Wle 1000 YIemL flmlde 9915E (906) MP-KI50 PAT (9P5) 0.5P-P0.Y GARY EDWARD HANDEL & ASSOCIATES hiNN NA Br.edW 1 floor NA York, NY 0029 (EIY) SPS-411E PA1 (21E) 955-POSE OWNER: TERREMARK BRICKELL 11 LTD. (A Dead, 1lmi P.rt.enhlP) [[DI s eeneen DrtY. c-. PerL.en Perr.m..k aN.k.0 n U fle*u. ce.P.nu..) P[Ol 9. ae5ehere Olive Pe. -i Gnvs. Ple4de 9913t Dda) B[P-Sm0 0 WILLY A. BERMELLO, R.A. FL. ARCHITECT REC. NO. AR 0007200 R-nuone� p" nerve: M I L L E N N I U M T O W E R NEY PLU Comm. No. —0.000 se.l.: AS SHOWN D[Le: 05/08/48 Dnrm: SD Checked: w COD file: SEE MYSf p DY.w i nue: TYPICAL PHILLIPS CLUB FLOOR PLAN 32ND - 41ST - F.A.R. CALCULATIONS Shea N.. FAR-1.13 E J15'-0' 15'-0' 75'-O' 15'•O' 14'-O' 16'A' 15'-O' 1 16'-0�-� 26'.6' 1 25'-6' 1 25'-G' 1 25'-G' T 25'-6' 25'.6' SE 11 ITE RIRACIE FF I----------� REEMEIITIAL WK RREAKOORW FLOORR IRNTR PEE REFI RE" a" PIOOR eM .e e M MM - MM r 1 6 TRN P 1 MAMEMRAL MT TOTAL 2< P O % a µ T" 10D S E 1 4 t h L A N E ,,.•no 8 FLOOR AREA RATIO LEGEND FAR 16,840 S.F. (X 37 FLOORS = 623,080 S.F.) ® NON —FAR 1,140 S.F. IX 37 FLOORS = 42,180 S.F.) JOINT VENTURE ARCHITECTS: BERMELLO-AJAMIL HANDEL JOINT VENTURE BERMELLO-AJAMIL & PARTNERS-INC Anhlt..ton M,Ww g K, 4 h1.N.r IWdp t..mon ,11.ex.m.. 2.1 . ftT.E.re Oriv. WemL no d. 33133 (39) eM-- F. (-) a%- GARY EDWARD HANDEL & ASSOCIATES Anhn..1, 19M 3,.—. i.W n..r N.w xerk NT ODO c91w sls-,112 Fe] (Elw us-909E OWNER: TERREMARK BRICKELL 11 LTD. 98011 9.WPeT.h.n �erlv.nhlp) G.v. P.rlam T.[rom.rk Br1v9W 11 (A n.rida C.[pentl.v) .01 & Bq.h.r. Drlw P"W.o,. 1 Looenut Lnw, FW4d, 331M (soel eae-31M 0 WILLY A. BERMELLO, R.A. FL. ARCHITECT REG. NO: AR 0007200 R=.ione� P,vj,o1 Nam,: M I L L E N N I U M T O W E R IQY PL Comm. N., 9820.000 S.M.: AS ShOWN Detw: 05/08/98 Drawn; 56 Checked: V8 CARD nI.: SEE DAYVMIP Dr.w'8 nu.: RESIDENTIAL FLOOR PLAN- 42ND - 78TH F.A.R. CALCULATIONS SO..t No. FAR-1.14 COLLABORATING ARCHITECTS: GARY EDWARD HANDEL & ASSOCIATES N.. Y.I4I. NY Imm (212) M-4112 FU (212) !!YMl WFAMELLO-AJAWL & PARTNERS-INC D­ Mi,ml. R,Hd, "133 m-m, ra (—) OWNER: S E 14th T E R R A C E OV 4' 4' GRANITE 1AVE)IS 6* x 6" GRANITE PAVERS RE —6' a 6' GRANITE PAVERS u UR iIP BOLLARDS 6' a 6' CRANITE PAVERS u BOLLARDS F,P I LTOL (A n.— U.iI­I P.—hi,) ml � P.,­ T.—­ (A n­Id. C�—.—) 2wLs. uy� o"il. _77 P.. 1 . . ....... LOADING DOCK RETAIL ov "I EL.10'.o. EL .10'0' smvnm o8w i6. EL,.10'- F11 E), B ujps L. EL..14'. LOBBY il�% I - 4- PC lo' CLUB VALET ELOR wI__ e Losey -6�­41M-CRANITE UP sEL..14'- 4- ON 9.0 WILLY A. BERMELL0, R.A. F. ARCHITECT REC. NO: &7-=Ell ��EL LOUNGE DROP VALET saw" DROP s EL..10' RECEIVING EL.W.G. 9'. t AR 0007200 7� TRASH/ MECR RECYCLING E5' up ON EL,14'� o. s I— I "'y EWA P­ — NILLENNIUN WA_LOADING DOCK - - — =m— — =: — FEA: M71� EL..6'-6 SLOPE UP TOWER RETAIL kk ..7'-o. m, -EL FP VAULT EMERGENCY s EL.14'- EL..14'- _r GENERATOR El L .14'0' EL..T.O w- -7— PAVERS (TYP.) ov QV 4' a 4' TREE CRATES (TYP.) QV FIP IP r,P 9110.000 E s. ga D=�: I PA CARD JIU.; GROUND FLOOR LANDSCAPE PLAN GROUND FLOOR LAWMAPE PLAN L:V SCALE:r-20'-a 3"*' P7&9 .1 — 3' . _°^­.— COLLABORATING ARCHITECT8 2. GARY EDWARD HARM i ASSOCIATES ARhifael. IaaS an.dw.J. 4M n..r N.w York. NY 10023 (rig) M-4112 rAE (21E) aa!-rW2 SERIELLO-AJAWL i PARTNERB•RIC Ar iuldi n apai...ii.a n.om.e NYHr Orye l..ertAr. ArtllWlWw 2001 a.. Bgth.w DA- S.R. 1000 IWmI n.Md. 00103 (305) M.-MM In (00S) Me -an `J OWNER: 750mu � �gL M Lm COM0(A nor," umiW P.rt. hip) ra01 L By.h.r. Driw 0— P.n..n T.mm.rk Brl.k.ii 11 (A n.Wd. Corps i-) 2a01 3. B.Y.hon Driw . Co 1 0ro new. asim (305) ira-Dr00 ALLAMANDA NNE TRNNED TO / IRFWS JAN BB \ TREWS• PUNT AT BASE OF 80 T2 GRILL RAILING I / ,� BENCHES BUILT INTO WALL ` \ \ FlpCUS ME PLANTED IN 12• K 12• PUNTER PIT �Ii1I1 I fil"fill I Iq I lII ROYAL PAIAIS IN TREE GRATE I ' - AT GRADE j O HEDGE WAIL (aiT 2 Q 2 9 \\ 7 1 FlP ` �L a \ iIP n eSTAINLESS STEEL CABLE 'yy \ OVERHEAD, ATTACHED TO i! I PIANTERNPIIS 10•AO.C• FlPI.•1NiFJ2 nTs SPACED \ \ ROYAL PALMS I AC!♦ `.\ \\ WATER \ \ BENCH _ FOUNTAINS JETS IJ I ® 1 1 \ ggg i \ I I I I I I WATER W a T) TRELLIS NiFLYARCH�TECT REG. No, li I I I 1 1 1 AR 000rdoo Ili I ASMINE SET IN PUNTERS AT i- JA I i I Il GRADE W Ti1 WATER I —�I BB I 1 ROYAL PALM TREES SET IN R6Y1O'� PUNTERS AT GRADE WIN WATER I I J REl AS BL II:`II O a JA ] A CA 1 a WALL aiT O I — n II II I I SALT I — — WATER BENCHES 1 I SPA II II Wee II', I WATER LILIES Proi«t Noma: II II I I I I ill NILLENNIUN II it / PROMENADE TOWER II II I II II WADING I $WINNING POOL I L._� j II II POOL li SLOPE TO DEEP, END JACU2D U II WATERFALL BASIN GRILL RAILING ImT PLAN II II • ^I 'gin' ^ I n GLASS BLOCK ul rl l n ALL �� N III IIII I u t i I I It Il ;i�. ! II 11 16 I I u�.l,.l II.' I g ` soup WALL (art) JA RET --- - - - - -- - - - -- - - - - - - - - _- - - - -- --- - --_ / Comm. N.. 9820.000 a.J.: I•-20'-0. D.. WY a. Be ..I BUILT IN. WALL / Dr w.: AR/UF CleHWI-II: PA CARD ru> On:a nu.: HOTEL FUNCTION LMOiCAPE PLAN 7ft LEVEL 2 HOTEL RJNCTM LANDSCAPE F L M An,. LEVEL Bh..t N. L-zo SCALET-W- ' L-Z.O E]I � G IPrC MM�O -- ]e-1 pm1:riwclm qEI � Ap•W v.W a ew• o.ul i.' CT.; Bed W.],rwF N[i AWN I wsl.) i� Cam.: a.a casmu•a xs .L rr•NN.roww.wWpw•N•Is. 1.u. NE m man Ou. 9 �.�. .au)M OtWO.M (N Pel.) ]! G.; !• NL• J Sp.: rlAl DuwA. rpw• of ® W.nT xlWN[ (M.s wIw) 3 r4 n' Irt: b' ac Jpn.Fun IM.! PP ❑ auJSW. nas m u' P.,L .m tr a,wluL WN; .• .a nd. P•.]a • w.i m inus � m Q .wuaa Ww 3 ..: x• . te-. b- ac rNi a...•Im,. nAt I� I I HOTEL t 1�I ►� RM HOTEL S E 1 4 t N T E R R A C E 4 LINEN/LAUNDRY 3,276 S.F. BALCONY BALCONY w:" 1F000H r1 FTjNTM �s wATERWALL vOOI 16 9LYEN BUTTONWOODS O� .0 O I p! .��/ O O� Soo SOD III OPEN SOD-TERWALL POOL WA ALL l� 5,537 S.F. �"' "' sanPWP vcrnu V wx'w� p7m■■■■■1 ■■�0J■■1 7TH FLOOR ROOF r DECK ►• %��,\ 1 �. i . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . op, OR, &M. 1 499.82• _.__________________________ SE 14 th L A NE el.ae e COLLABORATING ARCHITECTS: GARY EDWARD HANDEL & ASSOCIATES Anklt.ete t9W 9n _ , atn fY-r gee Yerk. BY 10023 (212) 93-4112 FAX (eta) m-M BERMELLO•AJAMIL & PARTNERS-INC An\It..tkn I.,.rml M-niy runs 2.+p t..ere, Aeak9..wr• 2601 3e. BAl.ken Drin 3WIe 1000 Ml—. PleHb. 33133 (300) W-0000 IAX (305) Me-MM OWNER: TERREMARK BRICKELL 11 LTD. m3. M.\en Dren (A n. Perte.n Terr.mark Briekell It (A ReNG Cwper.uoA 290t 2. Beleken ISA. P-tI, o 1 Cee-at Crave. flew. WSW(305) e50-3200 0 WILLY A. BERMELLO, R.A. FL ARCHITECT' REG. NO: AR 0007200 ,.I- ". M I L L E N N I U M T O W E R MY PUN Comm. If.. 3920.00B :tale: AS SHOWN OaIA: MAY B. (M Dnem AR Ckeektl: PA CADO Illy. Drw j Ylu.e ROOFTOP GARDEN 8th. LEVEL 3b"t, Ne. L-3.0 S.E.14TH STREET JOINT VENTURE ARCHITECTS: HANDEL JOINT VENTURE & PARTNERS-INC Hai U. av m°"°saw0 (1.) M-9me GARS EDWARD HANDEL & ASSOCIATES PARKIN - ANTANDE GARAGE ii�ii�i �_ , m u= P'.= (m)ae95-ou.. /%�jj%/j%//%%//j%� OWNER: Q i/jj%/jj%/j%//j% J /// (. flaiaA.Auml..aRK pP.,e..n°Ip)LTD. J FORTUNE P HOUSE,/ ,,/ ,/ ;,// <..r.. ae,. ai..) Hai B. 9.n°.r. D,i.. ip oIL cro­ elan. 39I9a m S.E.14TH TERR. 78 STORIES TOWER RESIDENTIAL - 42ND - 7 PHIILIPS CLUB - 32N - i!%ice HOTEL ROOMS - 19T - ❑ LLI IL-1 ❑ ❑ / wIFLYA CHA. TECT REG. NO:A AR 0007200 OFFICE - 10TH - 17TF I HOTEL FUNCTION 8TH SPORTS CLUB - 4TH - 6TH >Z PARKING - BSMT -51H Q ❑I 0101 Ell ❑I 01 m SET .E. 14TH LANE— �r�//�i/ MILLENNIUM T 0 W E R 2 N N O jj%/jj D.ie os/oe/m a. S% /j% //j% //%//j%/ SB Cn .ea: YB FYI.: SEE WYS—P CONTEXT SITE PLAN of u 1 CONTEXT SITE PLAN ® ft..I „.. not scnLE:r 4a-0 NORTH A-0.1 CONCRE "amisroP JOINT VENTURE t-NANDGP x"' ARCHITECTS: ®vla BERMELLO•AJAMIL d• DD1E R/ HANDEL JOINT VENTURE q 5 3 (PAINTED u 1 13 t8 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 >o I 12 >3 >a 75 >e 17 18 >a 20 21 22 23 24 25 2S BERMELLO•AJAMIL 30'-0' 15'-0' 16'-0' 16'-O• 15'-O' 14'-0' 16'-O' 16'-0' 16'-0• iS'-0' 16'-0' 16'-O' 15'•O' 16'-0' 15'-O' 16'-0' 27'-e• 25'-S• 25'-S' 25'•8' 25'•8' 25'-e' 25'-S• 2S'-e' 25'-8' 2S'-8• & PARTNERS-INC AreWteetun eale•.N.e ReBBI.e 1 1 M-r ! M ®Wla B+IW I.e4mM Nehllatun SETBACK- - - - STANDIRD PNtlVNC SPACE HANDICAPPED Stull zeol se. a.7eeer. DN.e i 4' 9' 4 0' swte toad I I -I I I -. I e� YI.m4 AoNd. 1910.9 (SOS) OSB-3a60 PeY (S06) &eB-Be88 — I 6 2 '-0' 4'-9• 20•_0• '-0' 0 '-0 I _ I I I I I I -& ASSOCIATES ANDEL I 8 E 1 4 I h T E R A E � � � aehla.em I I I I N I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I BB5 Bn.d.eP 4 6 Reo New Yere• NY t00xa (xlx) eBe-ms P. (elp Au-Bmz 4 .9s OWNER: L ,DROP OFF _041 SIDEWALK �*; \ U Fl 1ftAum1w P-.n Ip)LTo. r I Y �'�-8 hm. mro. A 8 WALK oG. P s= Terzemerk 8A.MU 11 (A Redd. Cerponllee) A eeol s. seneere D,e 4 $ I RETAILItO1 I PmWee..l B I IIe _ I EL.Y-O' I 8 I (aOBOBe) seo . Rewe axlsB J T e a e el e I ro6 R oC %8 DFWD s-2Wl7"ICAL cLEIAR� o P N \ M _ P'G I E4 F ® - VALET SOH LEVEL I F`4:-. e o e m e • I— I ITF� i (24 ' I II I � I .�_ I --1►—I__ �_ i D�"l -♦I = H SIDEWALK N- O I I I1., � K jj D OP OFF VALET RECEIV819 m e sL—ILL_ �uI-a 8 I w10'-O' L I 20'-0' m m KA L —� m W LaN ME0®P ' Qom. %�LAJ R181' WILLY A. BERMELLO, R.A. Y LJ FL. ARCHITECY REG. NO! 77F�,_7F M e —O I- I T�I RAlH/ '-0 •0 '-0 I P AR 0007200 m b'-O 1 0 ._o. 1ECIl RECYCLING "R 4— o N 50' 0• _ — u"a �'-2' MIN. VERTICAL I I Tel I E4 L�6'�• II I I I I (415 R IR R R 9 R I I I P ve 54'-10' T — V ELiB'-9• 'n SLOPE UP / FETAL 9 4 66 X68 EL..r-O I FPL VAULT a�a�c a $�ELn11'•0' Y 'a P.oi.el Neme: D Eh L.ii4'•o 1 2 pEN A1nItT I N I I N I M I L L E N N I U M 2x 2x Y 8 I MECft IlLn", I T O W E R O EL.. L'.O' I O VER JEAM�Cg _ w I O N SIDEWALK J I AlI SIDEWALK En I 408,82' ROL NEY PLAN Ni EL..V.S' In O Cv III,_61 26'-11• 71'-0• In 24'-0' 4 1 ' 24'-0• 74'-1' M 8E 14th LANE � t7t - i N O I Comm. No. 9520.000 jstele: AS SHOWN a De 05/0e/9e Dr : PCM/NJH E Checked: VD p CADD Rle: SEE OAY A.P Of U Dretie Rlla: GROUND FLOOR o SITE PLAN U 2 U No. a 1 GROUND FLOOR / SITE PLAN 9heat AAA SCALE:Y•X7-0' NOFITN A-1.0 98 - 786 COLLABORATING COMCSEIE vimsTOP ARCHITECTS: _,-4iM C/P SCN ® GARY EDWARD HANDEL & ASSOCIATES U l 7 J YI 1.3 L8 2 3 4 5 16'-0' 16'A' ib'-0' 15'-0 14'•0' 30'•0' 8 7 9 KI R 12 XI 14 15 Ri T7 1p K7 1p'-0 16'-0' 15'-O tb'- 0 15'-0' 15'-0' i6'-0• 16'-0' 15'-0' ip'-O' 27'-B' 25'•p' 25'•p' 20 21 2Z 23 24 25 28 25'-8' 25'-6' 25'•p' 25'-p• 25'-8' 25'-6' 26'-p• a 4' NOE RII S (PANIE(1 " Arcnilaet. Bre+th Floor N—er New Y¢NY . My (212) 508-111E TM A% (2 (P]P) 528-9OJ2 EBACK SPACHAND�PM STALL BERMELLO•AJAMI L I I I I I I 14'9• I I I I I CseTlA'pM—WDp a� nPArRaOlpO alT411P. gPARTNERS-INC _ SCALE: _1' - 10'•0' - Arehilaclure M.Aiaa..W, M.-tae Iaf.dor DedA. le.d«ew Arthileelure -8 2 '-O' 4'-9• 20'-0' '-9',_ —M 8 E- 1 4 t h TERRA ! I I I _I I I zeol so. e.y.n.re Dd.. Mt.lm1. Fladda --� 33133 (305) eee-Paso FM (M) eye-MB ® -0• -p - \ OWNER: o �? I I I I I � DR F I I I I SIDEWALK V. •pe I I \ TERREMARK BRICKELL 11 LTD. (A narida IAmltad Part.enhl A _- - �. SIDEWALK - - - - I ze01 s. sayenora 1n. P) Psrloe priak.11 it 1 B'-8• RETAIL • r-� to%a •.0• — A orporaU nark ( e e1.dd. c ) 2001 S. pgeh.re Driva caaaa nu! Erma. Fialyda 33133 RAMC (3as) ese szaa C1�%apB I 1 +'— I v 6 A 6 d 6 6 A A d m f-r 4L VERTICAL I I D_' — It . - -}xFaRANce - T_F` L I CARE (r H1� E — — PA — I I IVM I I u —d �77771 I BIB s o N UP r I 8 r H —� SIDEWALK' I —I �1 —t �. II '-0• •-0- EL+ J -p• X — RFF E +10 Y_ RE C IVIND _ -, ,_ __, ! N•_p• •`tL► I�77 6 A AI e��...a., M V t' 1— T- I E4 L.r i4.O Q 7 WILLY A. BERMELIA, R.A. FL. ARCHITECT REG. NO: AR 0007200 I I CL INGI `EL.N'-p S'-r I O N m SU'-0• I28'-0• -0 � -� I 20'-0' - I I� Mfl C_7..EA. RRNCEI I UP I � I I E4 Lam'-p• 1 9•-8.TEF Fail'. U I 4 9 4 4 Q LJ ReKaiona: LOAD NO DOCK N «— ♦-- ® _j e=� e m e _® I� e --rj �j— —� . r- — • - �f. RETAIL WO _ X55 X58 VAILT 1 2 ""�i' ^?'O9Y p u 8p•_8• n ,� Pla)ac1 name: E4 L1 +14 -0 2xa xa n n . 11 REAIL cl—, MILLENNIUM MECH EL .w o i DEL .r•o• u o m 21'.0' T O W E R 4i• R'-D' VERT EAR I o I N O SIDEWALK � I 11 I — I we.u• B O / MY PLAN 111'-8' 28'-11' 7V-0' i0 24'•0' 4 1 ' 24'-O' 74'-1' 1 '-10 euv 8 E 1 4 t h L A N E 8 NOTE UBNO THE OPTMAL BANK DRIVE THRU REDUCES THE PApKNO TOTAL ON LEVEL ONE comet. Na. 9820.000 FROM 194 TOTAL. CARS WFUMM TO .-I.: As swum *4 TOTAL CAM Data: Ds/ue/se Drawn: K H/POM Checked: Va DADD file: SEE DAYSIAMP Oraw'e Title: GROUND FLOOR SITE PLAN BANK DRIVE-THRU OPTION 1 GROUND FLOOR SITE PLAN 9haal No. -I SCALE:I'•20•-0' A-1.0a fib— IOU JOINT VENTURE ARCHITECTS: BERMELLO-AJAMIL HANDEL JOINT VENTURE BERMELLO-AJAMIL & PARTNERS-INC I--- .1. No — - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - — 8 E --I--- - - - - - - 14 h I T E RJR A CIE - - - - - I GARY EDWARD HANDEL & ASSOCIATES , I — — — — — .7-- — — — — — I — 7 --T 7 _T T—_ F ------------------------------------------------ It-T. T -- ---- F --- 7 — — -41 OWNER: R TE REMARK - — — — —_7 .7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — --- BRICKELL 11 LTD. (. L u u EIIJIAL _u 0, T EL-34r H I PARKING L4VEL 8-1 1 6' 176 CARS UP 1 H _u_ + j III K -, I L _u I�I�% I�— _ —l—sil HPILDING 4 "_L Fil- A. BERMELLO, R.A. WIFLLLYARCHITECTNO: 0 -u+J�-1ItlpIIII TTT I T 75971-1 7� ue I AR 0007200 nIII I -4 fit — 17� C TFFF 2 -0' N —,UP LuLU J :M / III II 1 /o 'NT ; II II III I MAINTENANCE M LE IN N I U M EL-W-O T 0 W E R IL __j Lo M- A I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - my PLW ----------------------------------------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - i k 8 E 141h L A N E idt- 7 7 - — - - - - - - - - - - — - - - - - - - - - — - — - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - — - - N.. 9920.000 8W.: AS sNOWN < D.I.: no/ 8/98 D-1 KJH O [hacked: va —D M.; SEE M- D, .', Title: u BASEMENT LEVEL PLAN r�BASE�MENT LEVEL PLAN 1b1*1 N*. AV SCALEX-W-a NORTH 98=-7W,;1 15'•0' 15'-0' 15'-O' 15 0L 15'-0' 15'-0' 16'-0• 15' 0' 15'-0' 15'-0' T 10-4- 27'-e' 25'-5' 7 25'4'_ 25'4' T 266— 25--c- 25'-e' 25'-6' II I I I8E 14 jh_ ITERJR A CIE I I I I I I I - -M \ \ ! I • I I I I I 0 !L w I I I 25 o f es ® 9�225'-O' . J.- J11emom�l_e�lem�oel=mm�oe Q \ R N�L�12 GARB I N yp a. II o EY ARKWB L!M!L 2 D J m m m 71771— 7�7117 N Ldw_ I � � � ' I �— I "f Q tt I ICI IQ t-��—I I I ♦.Il I I Q l� ecf8--® 9'- ' :108'•0' n DN ' ~. uP Q I I I I —I I Q �/ 'A b LiLLLIJ LL m 7777 7 /If/ - OPEN T slLow JERE o � 24'-0' 17 ® 9'-0' e 1 T.0' - - - - - - uiuJ \ — — — — — — — — . — — — — — 498.82'— — Ij aLµy 8 E 1 4 t h L A N E 8 SCALE:Y-20'-0- JOINT VENTURE ARCHITECTS: SERMELLO•AJAMIL HANDEL JOINT VENTURE BERMELLO•AJAMIL & PARTNERS-INC A«bIt«Wn s.Bm«n.a el.eele, hlmhr pviev la.doq AraMhel.n Eaat 9.. B.Then DNra Bull. 100a Yl.m( FleHde 99199 (9m) OSa-MO PAS (909) a5B-9daB GARY EDWARD HANDEL 3 ASSOCIATES vvhlMet 1905 9nad..P, 4W Dow N.v Yvrk NY 100E9 (�21T2))b96�-�. t PIX 011) 69a-W9E ja TERREMARK BRICKELL II LTD. (A Flwlda 11m_ PaM1v le) YBaa1 3. a-bt�r rteml �.k Brl<Y.B 11 (A Aertda Ceep.nllav) Ea01 e. e.7•b.n Dnn P«Wvu« 1 C«e.ut CPe«, Flaws 99199 (90a) Ma-9E(q 0 'HILLY A. BERMELLO, R.A. FL. ARCHITECT REG, NO. AN 0007200 Bwiaivna: PrvjecI Name: M I L L E N N I U M T O W E R NEY PI.W Comm. Ne. 9820.000 Boat.: AS SHOWN D.t.: 05/OB/ss DYa�o: KJH Chackad: VB CARD D1.: SEE DAYSI ma: f T1u.: SECOND LEVEL PLAN 9b..1 No. N A-1.2 IT 1 ffe U , 1.3 16 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 �5-O�'_�_�_ 15'-O' 11�5'.O• 15'A' 18'.0' , 2)'-6' T 25•-e' 7 25•-e• zs•-e• 25•-6• zs•-e• Y 2' S'-0_ 25'-!' � 25' 6' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I9E I 14#h I T E RJR A CIE fir- — . — — - —. — . — — � II �j— -- — -- I — ---R — — — �as_oa-----------R------ \ \ I I I m I I— II I OP TO LOW — I_ I _ j1�CHANiCAL I I I CH� NIC �-- C m m \ ...u. �� O I o 5 s a a 9' O' 2RKIIN 1J� I V l I NO d m ie 24.8-92 6AR8 lVELo I I ,aali I I ♦sI O `r1 1 EL.34•.0- 9N o u 1� b � � f Imo-- o_� I" � I I "►I m a I I � I I I ® m "C. —I- —I a 25. •-O• 0 j — r � _ ®m o e-'-' m _a®m ®® ®� '— _ _ a ®v— W o� —f 7 T o 2 9 N I I � I 2UP 4-0. SECURITY MAIN ELEC. CONTROL 24'-0" e ��---------- 49a.a2 8 E 1 4 l h LAN E F) JOINT VENTURE ARCHITECTS: BERMELLO •AJAMIL HANDEL JOINT VENT( SERMELLO • AJAMIL & PARTNERS-INC Arebl4elun BymwH.e Pl.mlry YMila e.N. IeeNew 4eMf.ewt. PeDI x. evbon Dn.. S.II. 1000 Yi.ml F).rld. STIa9 (90e) Bfi1-eehp FAT (9m) eN-wee GARY EDWARD HANDEL & ASSOCIATES Anh.l..l. 1e95 ron, areal — fleet x.. nr f R lafl Ns tfle put (xfx) su-pose OWNER: TERREMARK RRICKELL 11 LTD. (A Fl.rid. IJmitatl Pml.mhlp) xeDf a a.F•een mlw C.m P.rle.n Tsrtem.rY aNeYeD II (A Flertd. Ce.p.nNe.) gem a e.nb.r. Drh. Pw .el- l Crer. fle4tl. aa)a5 (906) eee-aa0 0 WILLY A. BERMELLO• R.A. FL. ARCHITECT REG. NO: AR 0007200 Nevrai.ni Project Name: M I L L E N N I U M T O W E R C.mm, N.. 9820.000 S..1.: AS SHOWN De 05/08/98 O—Z KJH Checked: Va CARD M.: SEE WTSTAMp Dr Vg Till.: THIRD LEVEL PLAN 8h..1 No. A-1.3 1( 4'-0' 1�_ 6'-O' 1�_ 6'-O' 78'A' 18'•O' 18'-O" 18'-0' 18'-O• 25'-G' 1 25'-6' 1 25'-G' T 25'-6• T 28'-6• 9E 14}11 TEIII ItACIE F_ FM I I I I I -- — — — — — — — — — — — — —R— — — — — — — — — II I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I T I I I I em o777FF� ®® I I I — y1lFROBNSS —. OPMEBMPPORt - -- - o \\ ,53 -C- SPmlNG I r Ml Tllmy Q I I I I o— _l — JJ \. L '-0' 2W-9 a —� _ _ _ Lw44• 1 t i 192RCA LE o 4 CAR lO�CO-ELF ERER E -F Q N UP —1— m-40 I-- —7 —1 —I —4 4—I me °� ®e��_®J.® ®®�®oI�® ° o TF�17 — — ELt44'-D' o I SQUASH COURTS 4 0 2TX32 I OPEN i ) I I BA ETBALL I ,2 I I / I \ I I u I. UP o l — -- I u tzLe�m®I=e o o • I POOL I MECH ICAL/I _ O ae �— — .— �.——.— — — - � SPORTS CLUBI MECH//JJl!ICAL/ O _� STORE 24'-0" co I I I Q — � ®® -® --— I 1 I 8 E 1 4 l h L A N E / 8 N F) 41H L_tVtL FLAN - SCALE:r as JOINT VENTURE ARCHITECTS: BERMELLO •AJAMIL HANDEL JOINT VENTL BERMELLO•AJAMIL & PARTNERS-INC AreWte. bd Eyl. I../met N . YWor p pe bcxkeel.n .01 BP. 9.xah... Drive tt,dw 1000 Ylemt Nand/ 90190 (900) 0.5i-e050 PNI (m) &50-xE98 GARY EDWARD HANDEL & ASSOCIATES en t..te rBrvetlw.)1 02 Neor N.. erlC NY (as) we-tluz F. (ae) 5/s-zmz OWNER: TERREMARK BRICKELL II LTD. (A n.M4. Llmltatl P.Mveh1FJ M01 A B.Tahme Drive P.rman hrtemvk Hr1.keD n e FtoMe CaR.nUen) Y401 8 o,e Drive P—theu- t 8s CeeevGrow FIoWe 09199 (906) a-9Po0 0 WILLY A. BERMELLO, R.A. FL. ARCHITECf REG. NO: AR 0007200 R=nony� .la.1 Name: MILLENNIUM T O W E R KEY PLAN Comm. No. 9820.000 Seal.: AS SHOWN Data: 05/08/28 Drnm: KJH Checked: VB CADD NJ.: S2£ DAYSTAYP Drnw'8 nu.: 4TH LEVEL PLAN - LOWER SPORTS CLUB Sha.t No. A-1.4 m ib'-O' 15'-0" IS'•O" IS'-0' 74'-0' 16'-O' 1b'-0' ( 15'•D- (15'-0" (ib'-O' 15'-0' ( 15'•0' I5'-O' 15'-0' 27'-G' 2W-6" 25'-0' 25'-6- 2W-0- 25'•G' 25'-G' 25'-0' II I I I I8E 11�h ITERJR ACIE I I I ! _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 1815E' — — — — — — — — — — — — — !� T I I I I ! I I I ' I I I I I I I I I I I PARKING LEVEL I o E! I I I \ 8 122 ARS p o l _ I L L —411i it5TH LEVEL PARKING LIE SETY EN = I - BOT UPPE Ill L WER RT CLUB LEVE - <ON BE��R►,EE�%-aR EL o N ' i —'i p I I 77 �r 18,-G.. 21.-5.2. p I I I I II I I I I I I I I OPEN I 8 I I L 1 F) Ulm LCVGL- rL-FVV — SCALE:1'•201-0' I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I I N � —► p l t o �.l EL.,•61' I I I I �� �� o tv tta� �- 3 113 I �� 8 E 1 4 t h LAN E 8 JOINT VENTURE ARCHITECTS: SERMELLO•AJAMIL HANDEL JOINT VENTURE BERMELLO • AJAMIL & PARTNERS-INC b— OMp Wl�baW McWeuW W zeot so. B.Twx. 0nre Mi., l nerld. =133 (SOS) --- PIS (—) B%-M3B GARY EDWARD HANDEL & ASSOCIATES Ammum. 1000 B-4;F, 41b Floor N- York NY IOOYS (21Y) 6W-1114 Pp (412) SOS-OmY OWNER: TERREMARK BRICKELL 11 LTD. (A n.Hd. I 14d Perm. p) W01 3. B.S.S— DHw Om P.rmen Txrem.ek arlewsu 11 q Hoed. cxPer.Dee) 2801 S. B•T.wx. Ortr. (3m) a. -son 0 WILLY A. BERMELLO, R.A. FL. ARCHITECT REG. NO: AR 0007200 Reviaiona: Project N.— M I L L E N N I U M T O W E R KEY PIAN Comm. No. 9890.000 9csle: AS SHOWN Dete: 05/0/98 Dn ro: KJH CEaeked: VB CARD nle: SEE DAY .p OnM 8 Tlee: 5TH LEVEL PARKING seeet ne. NOFITH A-1.5 98- 786 JOINT VENTURE ARCHITECTS: BERMELLO-AJAMIL HANDEL JOINT VENTURE 1S'•0• 15'-0• 15'-0' 1S'-D' 16'•O' 16'-O' 15'-O' 15'-0' 19 >a >s 16 n ,a 16'-0' 15'-O� 15'-D• 15'-0' 15') 15'-0' 27'-5' 25'-!' >s 20 21 22 29 24 25 Q8 25'-5' IS'-0• 25'•!• 25'-!' Q I 25'-!' 28'-!' 26'-!' '^r BERMELLO•AJAMIL & PARTNERS-INC wP ml..twe e.Bu «nog Pl.w1.8 maer aap Waw~ wRNl.etrn wt b. Bn.e. Dr1w Bwt. two n.mL nar11. 9.'I1S9 (8W) 861-tw8 PA8 (8U5) 85P-F89B GARY EDWARD HANDEL & ASSOCIATES I I I I 1 8 E 1 1411. 1TEAlit ACIE I I I I I nab— Dw8ro.8-eF {W F]e.r Y.h NY twTS _ (81E) 61e-{118 F/S (E1T) SF8-M8E OWNER: _ \ TERREMARK IRICKELL 11 LTD. r) l.vkena�elvpY). <.B. — — —I —I — _ — — - -I _ - - - - - - _e -I - R(lPAn01ht CdeDP; u II q � I I I— I— I- I I I I I C1JJ��mllt-e.tl E018B.hmDr1 cr..., na.a. salsa e (SM)M­ g ppgg��yy�� ITCH�N o I I SAL�N I DINWE CAFE V RESTIIIURAI� I I BAh I I I I I I I \ C + 1 I— i— i PARKING LEVEL 5 (BELOW) E� L.64-O• ,22 ARS \ a \ \ a W _ _ �LOCRS/SPA E yjh b. —.— F7177PRO SHO LOBBY I. — Q I I I I I Eh WOA LOCJER R�M MEN LOCKER ROOM ON � o I I o I I I ( —-1 FR NT DE I I --$ PA4 _ IIK e e e li o ®d ®� o e _®� _777� I I {--}- K4 WILLY A.-HERMELLO. R.A. L m� J �C1DS CIABE .I I — ®_�� i r o 1 ,I FL. ARAR)0007200REG. N0: I o I I I I I I u �jjI N m __ ON y, RNuv I I I I I I I /m _ LL O. p.m�L�o -- -- -- - - --j ----- - J - ,�O �1JJ !D 21 x32 1 RT8 BE w _. O. o_ I O.--- — . -� .— —y ®t OL m m m e / / B 771 — I ------ 11 \� I p E�I N I U M OPEN I// \ T O W E R I I 8 LO n w I I49LBr _L_ SE 1 4 l 11 L A N E a.w rn � i 8 o Comm. Nv. 9820.000 8c.1.: A5 SHOWN D..: 05/oa/98 I a a DtnwR: KJH Cha.keE: VB ECQD 0 M.: sa DAYS'rnMP m STH LEVEL Of PLAN - UPPER 0 SPORTS CLUB i 6 1 M LEVEL PLAN - UPPER SPORTS CLUB se..L N.. -' A-Ib SCALE:]'-=-O` NORTH A-9.B 98- 786 JOINT VENIRE ARCHITECI: BERMELLO -AMIL HANDEL JOU VENTURE BE RMELLO -A,MIL I 1.3 L6 ( 2 I 3 4 15'-0' 15'-O- 15'-O" 15'-O' ld'•D' 5 8 7 9 10 1f 16'-0' IS'•O' 15'-0' lb'-O" 15'•0' 72 15'-0" p 14 15 15'-0' 15'-0' M r/ ig Q Q Ig 2p 21 22 23 24 �25 - 26 & PARTNERSVC kae1l"x11a "s— >obt htsner 1 15'-O' 1B'. O" 27'-5' 25'•M 25'-5' 26'-m' 25'•b' 25'-m' 25'-m' 23'-b' 2�m_ DWP.temaM 2a01 od 1000 W.. 10em1 P.M. SSISY `-'M--P.`m'1`T' GARY EDWARDIANDEL 1 I I I I I I I I I IBE 1 14ih ITERIRACIE I I I I I I & ASSOCIATE a em .e. y— -� �- u._. Y are•awq ate ❑•o Ne. Yerk NT IOOY9 1ElY) 6Y5-1t 1Y TS (EIE) TYWE OWNER: I — TERREMARK BRICKELDI LTD. Terla. umwa PvLOeraP) of s. eneer. Drlw I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Ow. P•Mm Ter�amerk ick•D 11 U Tara. � gale•, A _� — �� vao�a a.T.eero la'os`) e e = . Tetrae aaA KITCHEN I I I.TmRAmf I I I I I I I I I �� I I I I I � D + I RETTAU—ff11 R/INT / BAR I I \\ \ —I NEw"B no1 E b I p FGI & 1 BEVERAGE zki FmGRT OK — I I L' AFNBQ G AWI B I I I I K _ �—� —- 44 � — ME TINE M 7 Ij I PRE FUNCT ON I K4 WILLY A. BERMELLO� R.A. FL ARCHITECT BEG. N0: M N I V LLOY I I I AR 0007200 dy a It TOM II o II — II I MEE�wG RM— II BANQUET HALL MEETING RM OPEN I II / Proiral Name: II II M I L L E N N I U M T O W E R o 2 — —�BL— KL`Y PUN aBL— C m.NO I � B B E 1 4 t h L A N E Comm. Ke, SS20A00 Srele: AS SHOWN Date: 05/Ob/as Dr•wa: POA1 n I ECeeaNad: ve O =D Tle: SEE MYa1AMP oo J Dre. g ntle: I HOTEL FUNCTION FLOOR PLAN L u 7TH LEVEL O / 1 HOTEL FUNCTION FLOOR PLAN - 7TH LEVEL Secret Ne. AiJ SCALE:I--W-V A-7.7 fib-- I u" JOINT VENTURE ARCHITECTS: BERMELLO•AJAMIL HANDEL JOINT VENTURE �� SE RMELLO a AJAMIL - 1 1.3 1.6 t 2) 3 4 5 8 7 9 10 11 12 pQq 15 16 17 iQ 1Q 2D 21 22 23 24 25 2B dt PARTNERS-INC Eo81x•rlue NchlGdun 18'•0' 18'-0' 7S'-0' Y 15'-O' 14'-O' 18'-0' IS'-O' 15'-0' 18'•O' 15'-0' 15'-O' 15'-0' 15'-O' 15'-D' 18'•O' 27'-8' 25'-8' 6' 25'- 2S'-[' 26'•8' 25'-[' 25'-B' 25'-8' 25'-[' 26'-8' Ge,�.p Ml. b. B•TMen orl.• Ye01w IW BkI000 \\mot\ I I I I I In•ml, Rerla. "Im (see) B56-B61B I I I I I I I I I GARY EDWARD HANDEL $ASSOCIATES I I I I I I BE 114 R R I T E RIR A CIE I Mek tBBe Brmd.eP, 4W Plmr I I I I � I I I I I I I I I I I I I - (YIP)Y60.S-k{t It pa(YIY) 6Y5-YW¢ I I I I�� OWNER: .e �- . .I� \ TERREMARK BRICKELL II LTD. 2✓ -- - - - - - - - - - �B&YB' - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- \ (A i°e. mat eDP. • btp) Cen P• lean i• k MekeD f711 •m• II 26 Pla&,• EorPereM- seat a e•nher• Drl.. A c Pmtheux 1 I I I I I I I LIN N/LAU DRY IEANT Br2 B S.F. 0�aP•— C --- ROOF DECK ELEV 74'- 1r —711 F O I i— W I --{ — HOT L L Y BELL _ I i I I 'o . B EL -�— I I s OT".O. ..LDDNT -4-- -a— 0 K _ — I I . JANDSCAPE DRAWING6 I 1 — - K4 WILLY A. BERMELLO, R.A. 1 R FL. ARCHITECT REG. N0: L m S IM I _ AR 0007200 I E G RM B _ I I N.Kefane: 10 MEE G RM— � BEL I ROOF BELOW I REFER TO LANDSCAPING DRAWINGS /� Project Name: ME GRM MILLENNIUM BE 37 5,8ENS.F.I TOWER / o IBL v 00 L 1 8 E 1 4/ A LAN E N B Comm. No. 9820.000 8o•Ie: AS SHOWN D•t•: 05/08/98 r j d DnrrD: PGM E Checked: Va M. FYte: SEE DAYSTAMP / O m DnWB Tltle: ROOF DECK FLOOR PLAN 0 8TH LEVEL U U 1 ROOF DECK FLOOR PLAN - 8TH LEVEL sh.et Ne. / A-4V SCALE:r,=-a A-1.8 98 786 L 1 1.3 1Q8 2 3 4 5 8 7 9 R) it 12 13 14 Q_i 15_0' L 15'-OQ75'-O" 75'-O' 14'-O" 78'-0' 15'-O" 16'-0' 15'-O" 15'•0" TS'-O' 15'-0" 15'-O' 27'-6' I 25'-6' I 25'-6' 25'-6' _[ 25'-6' T 25'-6' 25'-6- 25' r 25'-6' 2516' 1 1 i 1BE J 14�h I T E RJR ACIE F F R R \ —. — — — — — — — — —, — — — — —. 48&85 — — —. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — \ ^/ I I I I I I I I I I I I I \\ --- � \ \ - 1 L L __4 -I- 4 -1- 4- -1 4 4 4 J b --MIRit 1 I I-1�-trtrt I I I I 1 I I I I I I . . 8E 14 th LANE F) SCALER-201-9 JOINT VENTURE ARCHITECTS: BERMELLO•AJAMIL HANDEL JOINT VENTURI BERMELLO'AJAMIL & PARTNERS-INC MCWYeYu. e.AN.ariry P.amlee leluln Dwy. I.e4wp ArtWIMun B66t 80. B.T.kors Drin Batt. ,000 Y1.mk Plor16. 99199 (m) Po9-ePoo PAT Iwsl 699-Faso GARY EDWARD HANDEL a.I ASSOCIATES --heat. 1.6 Ba..a.q, Atk naoa Nmr Y.ak, NY I. (818) 6Po-1118 PA% (8,4) aIa-.9Y OWNER: TERREMARK BRICKELL 11 LTD. (A n rtaa IJmitaa P.r1v Mp) Eaal 9. B .-C.rlam C. srr.mvk (A T. Bah. BHak.B 11 (A 11mfa. Corp.nll.v) not B, o'—'..'I- .vthoun Ct A Co, PIaWa 991 St (soa) M eEa-9619 Grove EA 0 K4 WILLY A. BERMELLO, A.A. FL. ARCHITECT REG. NO: AR 0007200 Fewvona� Project No M I L L E N N I U M T O W E R f�Y PIAN Cam.. No. 980.000 9c.fa: AS SHOWN 0.1.: 05/06/96 DPmav: NJH CS.ok.,: WI CADO FYI.: SPF DAYSTAYP B 'A Title: MECHANICAL FLOOR PLAN 9TH LEVEL 5b.., N.. NORTH A-1.9 9 7 w E 1.3 1.6 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 W R 12 13 T/ 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 M U 15'-0'1S'. 15'-O' L 1S' 18'•0' 27'•!' 25'-S' 25'-S' 25'-S' 25'•S' 25'-6' 25'•S' 25' 25' S' 2S' S I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I F) Ur-M& PLAN SCALE:I•-2a-a I I► IBE 114}h ITERJRACIE I I I I I i- i_ i T T T i -i -i -i R iaeia• R I I- Ti- I \\ W RTO . ELE N1ECN. � � YADMEM I t -4 4 4 4 W I I I I I I I I I I U m rt II I I��rtrtrt I I I I I I I I I I ��� � Ltry 8 E 1 4 t A LAN E 5 JOINT VENTURE ARCHITECTS: SERMELLO -AJAMIL HANDEL JOINT VENTUR BERMELLO-AJAMIL & PARTNERS-INC ArtelMelun bplBwxq Pl.vvly YLSIw 0.dp 0.e..nM ArtelYeluw seD1 >b. B.T.eero nxe BuIU 1000 YI.mL A.Ma S11YJ (S06) Mp-Y060 P.0 (IIp5) 85B-pppp GARY EDWARD HANDEL & ASSOCIATES Arcetl.- SPp6 Bro.dwq. 41L Flex Nsw Tork, NT f00E0 (EIY) 6p6-tl11E PAII (Y1II) 6.5-MJP OWNER: TERREMARK SRICKELL 11 LTD. (A R-xtla (Imit-d P.xa.nelp) apol s n.P.een nx.. Dec Paxwn T Bx YeD I ( PlaTitl. torypnllee)ro < I .01 B. B.'b— D— P.—... I A Cocevut Grow. Fleur. p515.T (0pE) Epdaepp 0 EA 0 1 K4 WILLY A. BERMELLO, R.A. FL. ARCHITECT PEG. NO: IAR 0007200 N=i.ion.� Proj<ct Nam.: M I L L E N N I U M T 0 W E R ID:Y PLV1 coe.m. No. spso.000 S.— As s,,0- Dal-: 05/m/pB Dr— KJM Checked: VS CARD P11.: SE£ DAYSI0.YP Dnw'p Till.: OFFICE FLOOR PLAN LOTH - 17TH Sheet N.. NORTH A-1.10 b JOINT VENTURE ARCHITECTS: BE RMELLO • AJAMIL HANDEL JOINT VENTURE BERMELLO•AJAMIL 1 1.3 15'-D' 15'-D' 16'-D- 15-0" 14'-0' 16'-O" 13'-0' 15'-D' 15'-D' 75'•D' 15'-D" 15'-0' Y Y Y 15 �g Q T/ 18 tg 2p 2t 22 23 24 25 Q 28 & PARTNER8•INC Aroma ^ BOYh� W hhdw iS'-D' 15'-O' 18'-0' I 27'-5' 2S'•5' 2S'-S' 25'•5" 25'-a' 2S'-S" x5'•a xs' a zs' a zs' a" pdy Neblbctun t.adcap bl— 4eot Ye. 4v.eere Dnw �. ^� loon Yle L 11.0d. 33133 _ GARY EDWARD HANDEL I I I I I I I I I 8 E 14 i1 I T E RI R A CIE I I I I I I & ASSOCIATES _ � IP4dlLeroadv +m Hoer IoUE3 (EI4) 6P3 YorkII-IYNY PAY (YIY) SY3-M32 \ OWNER: .R-.�—Nfol �• .R TERREMARK BRICKELL If LTD. (A Flertda IJmlted Panoar.E1P) A �� I I I ( I I I I I I I I I I I I \� P�rBaan Teeremark BAekeD D (A (A Fle d. De Per.blen) 49e1 A Nq.hen Drive b. T I — I ( I I I I I I I I I I I I I p 6-1 �—� b L � I — •III ~III~I - — — �IIII — _ _I _-- aL —4I --4—I \����o�I� �- H— I- --- J I It III -4 4—�—� 4�1 IIII IIII IIIII LGF yL - —4}I IIIII - IIIII IIIII IIII 'I I- —�— KEA4 WLY A. BERMELLO, R.A. FL. ARCHITECTREG. NO: AR0007200 Nara ona: -- I — IP,n(.ot Name: M I L L E N N I U M TOWER n I — �— Q-48582 N1Y PLN �8L— o "i i — _ 8 8 E 1 4 t R L A N E i Q Comm. Ne. 9820.000 9wla: AS SHOWN D.- 05/08/98 E O Dra— KJH Cheeked: VB CADD file: 5EE 0.AY8fAMP MECHANICAL a FLOOR PLAN T U 18TH LEVEL i 1 MECHANICAL FLOOR PLAN - VM LEVEL sb— N.. LA-22 SCALE:r-2aa NORTH A-1.11 n A 00 0 Ij v U, 7 J 13 l6 2 3 4 5 15'-0' ib'-O' I6'-0. 15'-0. 15'-0' 27'-6' 1 25'-6e 1 25'-6' 1 25•-S' 25'-S' 1 25'-6' 25•-e' I! I ! ! I 8E I 14�h ITERIItACIE �j---------------R \ — — — — —--- _ _ R — — — — ---------—— —— L l- L L I- �. I �• � I-� I L L I- Ton I � •— --• .� e � .— _.. � 6 � _ - ° D O _ ��LI-----_I-I-I444 ! t-- f- I I I iL l I l���� HOTEL MT 9MARDOWN I O // / I ! QQ / ROOM umm PER 1N H K2 K-4 H-S WSP H4 K1 M-9 M-9 K N-11 1Lti w WN 11-0 FLOOR IBIYNYABI . .HI HIM N IIIY lrl. .H 9N 71H FM a ti 1 1 s 1 1 1 I t i 1 1 1 1 HHHTepppM " Is i0 09 a a 20 ti a N ESTE YUIETT TOTAL 269 II' / l� / B E 1 4 t h LANE 8 �l HOTEL GUEST FLOOR SCALE:rlla-a JOINT VENTURE ARCHITECTS: SERMELLO•AJAMIL HANDEL JOINT VENTURE SE RMELLO - AJAMIL & PARTNERS-INC Are.t Li41o.We1 n.00lel Yt I.Qp l.edr.q AMl�.etun UM U. B.nhen DEe. Woo Yl.ml nm\d. 3.133 I-) BII-Bxe F. (m) m-Ie3e GARY EDWARD HANDEL & ASSOCIATES Anhlle.te IM. sn.dw.1, eW Flo.r 919 Tmk. KY (ele) BH-ms PaO (9 Is]s) wd-smz OWNER: TERREMARK RRICKELL II LTD. (A n.e4. L_ .d P.rm.ra w BOB, 6. Bryahan Glr. IA AP.M.n Tensmsrk BrfekeB 1� eNd. Gllrenlle.) Y80] 9. Bry.hen DrM PwUwun ] p��) C000uut Grew, PIeW. 39133 E a IA WIR.A. FL. ARCHITECT REG. N0: AR 0007200 P=Yona� Praj.cl Name: M IL L E N NI U M T O W E R ID;Y PLAN Cemm. No. 9830.000 Be.le: AS sH _ D.t.: o/m/SS Draw°: PGM Cbeek.d: Vs CADD nle: SEE DAYST TYPICAL HOTEL FLOOR PLAN 19TH . 31ST Shast No. n A-1.12 U ' is 16 O'1.615'-0' 2 t5'-0 ' 3 L-0-, — M— 15'-0' 1( 5'-0' 15'-0' lb*-O' 15'-0' 15'-0' t 1 � j 16'•O' 25'•6' [ Mr L 2&-6- 1 2W-6' I 25'-0' T 26'-6' T 25'-6' T 25'-0" T 25'-6- I I I I I I 1 I I8E 141h ITERJR ACIE I I I — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — �� I L7I AD tnr-rc• I ..lur \ 7tL I .ir to \� L I I_ --I_ -- -I I- I- ---\�\ um K _.�. mow.. Ilp Y un10.4 m W u_ -- -} I I I- I I _I- _�- -I- _�- - I I I I I I I I I I rt Ifit��l I I 111 I I��rtrtrt I I I I I I I I I I �� � PH"" CLUE VMM 611EAKDOMM FL00114 um KK gC-1 d vC-x iC•4 0Ci PC-Y PCB rCd PC-6 tied tMv 410t FM. 10 t UM "s CLUB UW TOTAL 90 70 p x0 10 10 10 10 T"Wars CLUE 100 / tl B E 1 4 t h L A N E COLLABORATING ARCHITECTS: GARY EDWARD HANDEL & ASSOCIATES Arehitwt. 1995 Broadway, 4th Roo, New. NY 1-3 (219) 50-4 112 PAg (212) 599-90M BERMELLO'AJAMIL & PARTNERS-INC A,.hit«tun Evgl.aaring Piemfvg Llano, Daft. L dww, Am6iteMun 2901 30. B.y.ho,e Drive SW. l000 Yi.mi, norid. 3W33 (305) 050-Mf FM (305) NO-9938 OWNER: TERREMARK BRICKELL II LTD (A n.,ld. IAmitad P.rtner.hip) 2801 S. Bay.hora Drive Can. Par tvan Terram.rk B,lokell 11 (A norid. C.,... U..) 2001 S. Day. or. Drive P.nlhouw t C.mvut G,ove. Flelyda 39199 (3Ds) ese s2oD 0 WILLY A. BERMELLO, R.A. FL. ARCHITECT REG. NO: AR 0007200 R=eiane� Pr.1.cl No M I LLIENINI UM TOWER 16Y PLAN Comm. No. 9920.000 Seel.: AS SHOWN Data: 05/OB/9B Drain: PCN Checked: VB CAOD nle: SEE OAY _p —Ig IN-: TYPICAL PHILLIPS CLUB FLOOR PLAN 32NO - 41ST sheet No. A-1.13 L � 1.3 L 16'-0' 15'-0' 15'-0' 15'-O' l iT 6 O' 15'-0' 15'-0' 15'-0' 15'-0' 15' O' 25'-6' 1 25'-6' 1 25'-G' 1 25'-6' 1 25'-G' 25'.6' I I I I I I I I I 8E I 14}A ITERJR ACIE F F_M-_' _ —.. .. \ w I _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _400_06' \ + —�I —� not - -�-- �i 2°; 6q t I �-- I _II L L L I— OF 4 4 4 I I r Li -- F-) 1W81601111LL MY oflum 0MM FLOOff LIMITS F6f fe8.1 H fEW IMS-4 41" an" 0E8.7 FLOtM aM r r a.M r apa r aM r ose r air r "m d— 881Y Fk.. 7 1 t / 1 t t 1 MMY MAL OMENTIALR 2 t2 a u 12 H VAISMM'To,rALM� N i — L — 6NC / 8 E t t t f LANE / f COLLABORATING ARCHITECTS: GARY EDWARD HANDEL & ASSOCIATES A hl t. IB95 Broadway, 4th Floor New York, NY 10023 (212) 595-4112 FAT (212) 595-9032 BERMELLO'AJAMIL & PARTNERS-INC ArchilacWn E.gi.... iv2 Plaovivg lot .r D.dgo lead..q Arthit t- 2601 a.. Beyshors Driv. Salle 1000 Miami, Florid. 33133 (305) M-2050 ra (3m) 859-9030 OWNER: TERREMARK BRICKELL II LTD (A Florid. Urditod Pertv.rehip) 2801 S. Bayahore Dn Gv. Perlvan Ternmerk Bnekell 11 (A Florlds Corporatle.) Mill S. Beyshor. Drive Pavthouse I Co.00ut Drove Flolyda 33133 (305) M 3mo 0 WILLY A. BERMELLO, R.A. FL. ARCHITECT REG. NO: AR 0007200 feiuon.: Pr.ia1 Neme: M IL L E N NI U M TOWER 10;1' PLAN C.mm. No. 9520... Soel.: AS SN Date: 05/08/98 DrawO: P0M Checked: VB CARD File: SEE DAYSTMIP Draw'g Tilla: RESIDENTIAL FLOOR PLAN - 42NO - 53RD sh..t No. A-1.14 lt•-0' 1 15'-0' 15'-0' T 15'-0' T 13'-O'T75'-O'T15'-O'T15'-0'Tl( 5_0'71� W-0' 27'-5' T 25'-5' 25'-5' 7 25'-5'_ 25'-5' 25'-5' 25'4' 25' S' 25. 5' 25' M i ISE 1 141h ITERJR ACIE I I I I i I —_i9e_o9 R \ rrF------------ -- -- Mam 91.11. ..I51 uw .t„M la 4 —��——�I--_---I—��—}---F 4 —1__I_ I I I I I I I _I_ � �fi1—I—I I I I I I I-1��trtrt I I I I I I I— � M.MMUM WRY MAX00" PLOORt MTS PER tl1 -t IIEW noon 54a Sw »5a Pln. 4 1 1 1 IMT� T�ONTLL tt 6 26 25 Mr"AL mG U) — — 7 _ �-`� , L 1 SE 14th L A N E ors 8 F) COLLABORATING ARCHITECTS: GARY EDWARD HANDEL & ASSOCIATES .a.bf t. 1095 Bred-.7, 1tn n— N.- Y.rk. NY 10023 (212) 5%-4113 FAX (212) 595-M32 BERMELLo-AJAMIL & PARTNERS-INC Archtt..ture E.E1na..i.5 P1ama.5 Ivlm.r DWO IA.d...p A bit tun 2501 S. B.7.h.r. DO— Sufi. l000 N,.mi, Fl.rld. 33133 (305) 859-2050 FAY (SM) 959-0039 OWNER: TERREMARK BRICKELL 11 LTD (A n.Hd. Limited P.rtner.hjP) 2do1 s B.2,no1. Drf- G.n. P.1t0... Terr.m.rk Brl.kell II (A F1.rlda C.,9 .U.n) 2601 S. B.7.h.re Dn P.nN. 1 Coconut Gr . F1.1— 33133 (305) am-3200 0 "ILLY A. BERMELLO, R.A. FL. ARCHITECT REG. NO. AR 0007200 R=i.i.na� —I.ct Name: M I L L E N N I U M TOWER MY PV Comm. N.. 9820.000 S.C.: AS SHOWN ➢.t.: 05/03/98 Drn-n: POM Chxked: YB CADD M.: SEE MIW MP D'.,r'S nu.: RESIDENTIAL FLOOR PLAN- 54TH - 78TH She.t N.. A-1.15 O O o[ w O O O O O W W N � Upl Y r7 P O TING GARY EDWARD HANDEL & ASSOCIATES Architect. 1995 Broadway. 4tb Floor Naw York, NY IN 3 (219) 50-4112 F" (2121 598-903e BE RMELLO • AJAMIL & PARTNERS-INC im"), l.atur.e.{iose'i" Plami.{ad- 0-4. 1e.4.e.q ArtbtWa01 So. B.y.b... DH1. 1t. 1000ami, Plorids 33133 es{-2950 rAK (s9s) es9-ease OWNER: TERREMARK BRICKELL 11 LTD (A Fl.114. Limited Part.erahty) 2801 S. B.yebora Drive Ce.. P.rmen Ybrromerk Briokell If (A Flarlda C.rporetio.) 260. S. Bayehare Onus Pa.—.. 1 Coc...t Crove. —IN. 33133 (305) ON-e209 0 WILLY A. BERMELLO, R.A. FL ARCHITECT REG. NO: AR 0007200 B� Project Name: M I L L E N N I U M TOWER Comm. No, 9820.000 Seale: 1*- 30'-0' De MAY 8. 98 Draw.: KJH Checked: vs CAN FYI.: SEE OAYSrAMP Drew'{ YYtla: WEST ELEVATION Sbaet Na. A-6.0 9 786 ji lilgi lawl 11 EMEM I m I I d d d d d d d d d d d dd d d d d dEZddd fedd xd add =d Aed:d ld cd lid :d wd a!l tt ; COLLABORATING ARCHITECTS: GARY EDWARD HANDEI & ASSOCIATES Ar MW.t. 1995 Broadway, 4u Fleor New York, NY I0023 (212) 50-4112 PAY (212) 595-2032 BERMELLO•AJAMIL & PARTNERS-INC ArciilectMrs Dngiasoriag Plannlog lelarior DadEa i.ddw.p. ,M.eit.rt.r. 2.01 so. 8gahora Drive S.R. 1000 Miami, Florid. 33133 (305) 859-2050 FAX (305) 8.58-9838 OWNER: TERREMARK BRICKELL R LTD (A Florid, ❑mltad Partn.nhip) 2801 8. ""nora Drlva 0an. P. to Yemmerk Umksll 11 (A Florida Corporation) 2001 B. B.F.bera Driv. Panthoeae I Coconut Grova, Flairds 33133 (906) 858-9290 0 WILLY A. BERMELLO, R.A. FL ARCHITECT REG. NO: AR 0007200 Project Name: M I LLENNIUM T O W E R Cemm. No. 9520.000 ...1.: 30-0. Date: MAv 8, 98 Drawn: KJH Checked: Vs CADo M.: sa WY MP Dreg MI.: BUILDING SECTION sheet ... A-7.0 $ a a a s a a a s a a a s a s a s a s a a a a a14,4 died 98- 786 COLLABORATING ARCHITECTS: GARY EDWARD HANDEI & ASSOCIATES Arehite.te 1995 9ro.4wq. tth Floor N— York, NY 10023 (212) 305-4112 FAR (212) 595-9032 BE RMELLO - AJAMIL & PARTNERS-INC .4ehil«tore Enaln..riry pl.oniy WW60 Dnip I.od.c.9. AroSils. 21 0, so. a.F.hor. 0,1'. Mt. 10.0 Ii— Florid. 33133 (096) 969-E050 FAR (003) d59-9a32 OWNER: TERREMARK BRICKELL 11 LTD (A Flerldo Umit.d Perlverehip) gaol s. B.F.hdra Drive G.n. P.rtnen T.mem.rk arl -1 II (A Florid. Cerporatton) 2801 S. aephor. Drive P..thoo.. I Coconut Grove, Florrd. 33133 (305) 95a-3200 0 WILLY A. BERMELLO, R.A. FL. ARCHITECT REG. N0: AR 0007200 MOTTIM Prol- Nome: M I L L E N N I U M TOWER Ceram. No. 9820.000 9B Drawn: KPH Mh k.d: Y3 CADD File: sa WYSIAMP Dn 'T1Ue: BUILDING SECTION 3he.L N.. A-7.2 -_- § 4 § § § � � a � � i F1, • S E � � � Sx 8� �� �3s g3 �1 d� �3 �8 �� �� $t 2' 2s � �. d d d i d d d d d d d I d dd d d dEsd id N Esd 9; i; 9; N cd 5; €d Ed Ed GARY EDWARD HANDEL & ASSOCIATES Arehiteote 1995 Broadwq, 4th Floor Now York, NY IW23 (212) M-4112 FAX (212) 595-9052 BERMELLO•AJAMIL & PARTNERS-INC Architaetur. se2ineerin9 plamto3 W.A. DWI. Wdaeeq. Arthl—.. 2001 Se. Beyehora DAve guile IOOD Rleml, Fioride 0 (005) 859-E050 FAX A% (005) &$B-BdOB TERREMARK BRICKELL II LTD. (A Fleride IJmlted PertnerWip) 2901 S: Be)ehore Drive Gap. ,id, re Terr.,) Bricked II (A Florida Corperatien) 2601 S. BeY' Drive Panthoues t Coconut Grove, Flolyds 33133 (006j 95d-9200 0 WILLY A. BERMELLO, R.A. FL. ARCHITECT REG. NO: AR 0007200 Project Nome. M I L L E N N I U M T O W E R m PUN Comm. No. 9820.000 S_W I'- 30'-0' Date: MAY 8, 98 Drown: KJM cheekad: VB CADD Flle: SEE WYS'IAMP D_., Title: BUILDING SECTION Sheet No. A-7.3