The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutR-98-0219J-98-105 2/24/98 RESOLUTION NO. 9 8 210 A RESOLUTION, WITH ATTACHMENTS, AMENDING THE DOWNTOWN MIAMI DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT (DRI) MASTER AND INCREMENT I DEVELOPMENT ORDERS (RESOLUTION NOS. 87-1148 AND 87-1149 ADOPTED DECEMBER 10, 1987, AS AMENDED BY RESOLUTION NOS. 91-698 ADOPTED SEPTEMBER 26, 1991, AND RESOLUTION NOS. 94-849 AND 94-850 ADOPTED NOVEMBER 17, 1994), FOR THE AREA OF THE CITY OF MIAMI UNDER THE JURISDICTION OF THE DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBITS 1 AND 2 ATTACHED HERETO), BY AMENDING THE MASTER AND INCREMENT I DEVELOPMENT ORDERS BY SIMULTANEOUSLY INCREASING AND DECREASING THE QUANTITIES OF DEVELOPMENT IN CERTAIN LAND USE CATEGORIES; ADDING NEW CONDITIONS; FINDING THAT THESE CHANGES DO NOT CONSTITUTE SUBSTANTIAL DEVIATIONS PER CHAPTER 380, FLORIDA STATUTES (1997); AND ALSO FINDING THAT THESE CHANGES ARE IN CONFORMITY WITH THE MIAMI COMPREHENSIVE NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN 1989- 2000. WHEREAS, on December 10, 1987, the City Commission adopted Resolution No. 87-1148 approving a Master Development Order for the Downtown Miami Development of Regional Impact, and Resolution No., 87-1149 approving the Increment I Development Order for the Downtown Miami Development of Regional Impact; and WHEREAS, there is a need to increase the number of seats in the attraction/recreation land use category to accommodate proposed new development, while there is a surplus of unused development in the office land use category; and 0��- Its ATTACHMENTS) CONTAINED CITY COMM E, MEETING OF FEB 2 4 IM 8 9'r19 WHEREAS, the simultaneous increase and decrease in the aforementioned land use categories is compatible with the uses designated for the downtown area and does not conflict with the land use designations for the area as designated in the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000 Future Land Use Plan Map; and WHEREAS, the Miami Planning Advisory Board, at its meeting held on January 14, 1998, following an advertised public hearing, adopted Resolution No. PAB 04-98 by a vote of six to zero (6-0) RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of the proposed amendments to the Master and Increment I Development Orders for the Downtown Miami Development of Regional Impact with conditions as attached hereto; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Subsection 380.06(19), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1997), on November 26, 1997, the Downtown Development Authority submitted a "Notification of a Proposed Change to a Previously Approved DRI,11 to the City of Miami, the South Florida Regional Planning Council, and the Florida Department of Community Affairs on November 26, 1997; and WHEREAS, on January 27, 1998, the Miami City Commission held a public hearing on the proposed amendments to the Master and Increment I Development Orders for the Downtown Miami Development of Regional Impact as attached hereto; and WHEREAS, the City Commission determined that all requirements of notice and other legal requirements have been complied with for an amendment to the Master and Increment I Development Orders for the Downtown Miami Development of Regional - 2 - 98+ 219 Impact; and WHEREAS, the City Commission deems it advisable and in the best public interest, and the general welfare of the City of Miami to amend the Master and Increment I Development Orders for the Downtown Miami Development of Regional Impact as hereinafter set forth; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. The recitals and findings contained in the Preamble to this Resolution are hereby adopted by reference thereto and incorporated herein as if fully set forth in this Section. Section 2. The proposed amendments to the Master Development Order for the Downtown Miami Development of Regional Impact (Resolution No. 87-1148, as amended by Resolution Nos. 91-698, 94-849 and 94-850), which are attached hereto as Exhibit "B" and made a part hereof, do not constitute a substantial deviation and, therefore, do not require further development of regional impact review pursuant to Subsection 380.06(19), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1997). These amendments are in conformity with the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000. Section 3. The attached amendments to the Master Development Order for the Downtown Miami Development of Regional Impact (Exhibit "All) are hereby approved. Section 4. The proposed amendments to the Increment I - 3 - 98- 219 Development Order for the Downtown Miami Development of Regional Impact (Resolution No. 87-1149, as amended), which are attached hereto as Exhibit "B" and made a part hereof, do not constitute a substantial deviation and therefore, do not require further development of regional impact review pursuant to Subsection 380.06(19), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1997). These amendments are in conformity with the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan E�sZ:Is�3iId�� Section 5. The attached amendments to the Increment I Development Order for the Downtown Miami Development of Regional Impact (Exhibit "B") are hereby approved. Section 6. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 24th day of February , 1998. X-kAVIER L SUAREZ, MAYOR - 4 - 98- 219 PREPARED AND APPROVED BY: GEO E K- SONG, I I 61 ASSIST CITY ATTORNEY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: EDWARD IM CITY 194:GKW:BSS - 5 - 98- 219 Exhibit "A" Master Development Order MASTER DEVELOPMENT ORDER NAME OF DEVELOPMENT: Downtown Miami NAME OF DEVELOPER: Downtown Development Authority of the City of Miami AUTHORIZED AGENT OF DEVELOPER: Matthew Gehw r " Patricia Allen, Executive Director, Downtown Development Authority and Sergie Dear Lourdes Elazyk, Assistant Director, City of Miami Planning, Building and Zoning Department, or their successors. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The Project consists of development in Downtown Miami through the Year 2014, including the following land uses and increments: Increment I Increment II Increment III Land uses Buildout- DPc 10, 1999 Buildout- Dec_ 201, 2005 Buildout- Dec_ 10, 2014 Totals Office 6, G- 77, 277 3,600,000 3,700,000 13, 97q, 27- (gross square 6,595,406 13,895,406 feet) Government 300,000 250,000 200,000 750,000 Office (gross square feet) Retail/Service 1,050,000 400,000 500,000 1,950,000 (gross square feet) Hotel 1,500 500 1,100 3,100 (room) Residential 3,550 2,550 2,920 9,020 (dwelling units) Convention 500,000 0 0 500,000 (gross square feet) Wholesale/ 1,050,000 0 1,050,000 2,100,000 Industrial (gross square feet) Institutional 300,000 0 300,000 600,000 ( gross square feet) Attractions/ 6,50 1,600 5,000 z3,' Recreation 30,500 37,100 ( seats ) Marine 230,000 230,000 Facilities - 1 - 98- 219 Pursuant to F.S. 380.06(22) (3:987 1947), the Project specifies the total amount of development planned for each land use category, but provides flexibility for such development to be located anywhere within the Project Area, subject to local land development regulations. The Project Area includes all property within the boundaries of the Downtown Development Authority, with the exception of that area between NE/NW 5th Street and I-395 known as "Park West", as illustrated on the map in Exhibit 1 and described in Exhibit 2 attached hereto. The Project Area contains a total of approximately 839 acres of land, including approximately 78 acres currently zoned and developed as City parks. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: See Exhibit 2. DEFINITIONS: For the purposes of this Development Order, the following terms shall be defined as follows: ADA or Application for Development Approval: The original Application for Development Approval for Downtown Miami filed by the DDA on November 25, 1986, pursuant to F.S. 380.06 (4:987 1997). CADA or Consolidated Application for Development Approval: The revised ADA prepared pursuant to paragraph 16 on page 13 herein. Certificate of Occupancy: A permanent or temporary and/or partial Certificate of Occupancy issued, pursuant to Section 307 of the South Florida Building Code, for any "Net New Development" as defined herein. City: The City of Miami, Florida. Council: The South Florida Regional Planning Council. DDA or Downtown Development Authority: The Downtown Development 2 - 98� 219 Authority of the City of Miami, Florida. DERM: The Metropolitan Miami -Dade County Department of Environmental Resources Management. Development Credits: The individual units of land uses included within Total Allowable Development, as measured by square footage or number of dwelling units, hotel rooms, or seats. FDER: The Florida Department of Environmental Regulation. Major Use Special Permit: A special permit issued by the City Commission pursuant to Ordinance No_ 9500 11000, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, as amended. Net New Development: Any construction or reconstruction which will result in a net increase, within any "Parcel of Land", of residential dwelling units, hotel rooms, seats in attractions/recreation facilities or gross square footage for office, government office, retail/service, convention, wholesale/industrial or institutional uses. Land uses to be removed by demolition of a building or structure may be credited against the proposed new land uses for purposes of calculating the net increase, if the Planning Director determines that there was a valid Certificate of Occupancy existing on the effective date of this Development Order for the land uses to be demolished. If a change of land use is proposed, the Planning Director may credit the prior land use against the proposed land use based upon equivalent impacts as measured by peak hour vehicle trip generation. Any activity which has on the effective date of this Development Order a valid building permit or any currently effective Development Order shall not be included as Net New Development. The Planning Director may exclude from Net New Development any small development under 10,000 square feet in floor area, if he finds that such development would have no regional impact as measured by peak hour vehicle trips. - 3 - 98- 219 Parcel of Land: Any quantity of land capable of being described with such definiteness that its location and boundaries may be established, and which is designated by its owner or developer as land to be used or developed as a unit or which has been used or developed as a unit. Project: That Project described in the "PROJECT DESCRIPTION" on Page 1 herein. Project Area: The area included within the legal description in Exhibit 2. Total Allowable Development: The quantity of Net New Development for which Certificates of Occupancy may be issued under the terms and conditions of this Development Order, together with the applicable Master Development Order, as may be modified pursuant to F. S. 380.06 (19) (4:987 1997) , and which shall be measured by the following land uses: Office Government Office Retail/Service Hotel Residential Convention Wholesale/Industrial Institutional Attractions/Recreation Marine Facilities 6,677, 6;5951,406 gross square feet 300,000 gross square feet 1,050,000 gross square feet 1,500 rooms 3,550 dwelling units 500,000 gross square feet 1,050,000 gross square feet 300,000 gross square feet 6,590 30,500 seats 230,000 gross square feet The City may permit simultaneous increases and decreases in the above described land use categories, provided that the regional impacts of the land uses as changed will not exceed the adverse 4 - 98- 21$ regional impacts of the land uses in Increment I of the Project as originally approved, as measured by total peak hour vehicle trips. ACTION TAKEN: That, having made the conclusions of law set Increment I of the Project following conditions: findings of fact and reached the forth above, it is ordered that is hereby approved, subject to the THE CITY, ITS SUCCESSORS, AND/OR ASSIGNS JOINTLY OR SEVERALLY MAY ISSUE BUILDING PERMITS AND CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY FOR TOTAL ALLOWABLE DEVELOPMENT, PURSUANT TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THIS DEVELOPMENT ORDER TOGETHER WITH THE ATTENDANT MASTER DEVELOPMENT ORDER AND SHALL: 1. Require all development pursuant to this Development Order to be in accordance with applicable building codes, land development regulations, ordinances and other laws. •"TWO OTERIZEN WeYeMu-• • O (Elome•- •• -• AF VA •• - •- - 5 - 98- .219 Wilt]--1 11 • u •• // • u /— •— �. u— �-•_ 11-1 • •lull 1 � � � - •.1 /_ �•WIFFEWS-Tim-OrMM WiTSTIlif -• • • - - rp-lated to 1 • - 11 ' - 1 • ' 1 • 1 ' • ' • • •am m 1 • - 11 . • • 1 - F.vp—nt—.q---in t7be 1' A•• 1t -,ball gubmi1 07 I • 1111MI • II III ill WE 1 1 • • 1 • 11 • • • - 1 - • 1 1 . • • 1 - - 1 _ 1 • • ' ' • 1 • -, '14,441 • • oil • 1 1- • 1 1- - 1 1' • 1 • -• • 1 1' 1• - 1' • 11• - • 1' �. 11- • 1 1 11 -• 1• - •- ''• IR • 11' • 1 /' - 1• I - •- ''I ?10190 • • - - • 1 • • • • 11 1 1 • 1 Ill IN 111, 1 ' 1 11 • - • • . 6 - 98- 219 averaap- . : 1 • - • • • • ' • - 11 - attracti=sIre-creatio-11transfer •. be •. -• a Special Daytine Event Traffic Plan /' 11-Special nayfine • • noiths nrior• • - exnpcted--date for• - - 7 - 98- 219 Exhibit "A" Master Development Order MASTER DEVELOPMENT ORDER NAME OF DEVELOPMENT: Downtown Miami NAME OF DEVELOPER: Downtown Development Authority of the City of Miami AUTHORIZED AGENT OF DEVELOPER: Matthew Sehwar Pa t ri r i n Allen, Executive Director, Downtown Development Authority and e Redrigueff Lourdes Slazyk, Assistant Director, City of Miami Planning, Building and Zoning Department, or their successors. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The Project consists of development in Downtown Miami through the Year 2014, including the following land uses and increments: Increment I Increment II Increment III Land uses Buildout- Dec_ 30, 1999 Buildout- Dec_ 30, 2005 Buildout- Dec_ 30, 2014 Totals Office 6,677,277 3,600,000 3,700,000 1:3T-7, 27- (gross square 6,595,406 13,895,406 feet) Government 300,000 250,000 200,000 750,000 Office (gross square feet) Retail/Service 1,050,000 400,000 500,000 1,950,000 (gross square feet) Hotel 1,500 500 1,100 3,100 (room) Residential 3,550 2,550 2,920 9,020 (dwelling units) Convention 500,000 0 0 500,000 (gross square feet) Wholesale/ 1,050,000 0 1,050,000 2,100,000 Industrial (gross square feet) Institutional 300,000 0 300,000 600,000 ( gross square feet) Attractions/ 88 1,600 5,000 1:3, Recreation 30,500 37,100 ( seats ) Marine 230,000 230,000 Facilities - 1 - 98- 219 Pursuant to F.S. 380.06(22) (1987 1997), the Project specifies the total amount of development planned for each land use category, but provides flexibility for such development to be located anywhere within the Project Area, subject to local land development regulations. The Project Area includes all property within the boundaries of the Downtown Development Authority, with the exception of that area between NE/NW 5th Street and I-395 known as "Park West", as illustrated on the map in Exhibit 1 and described in Exhibit 2 attached hereto. The Project Area contains a total of approximately 839 acres of land, including approximately 78 acres currently zoned and developed as City parks. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: See Exhibit 2. DEFINITIONS: For the purposes of this Development Order, the following terms shall be defined as follows: ADA or Application for Development Approval: The original Application for Development Approval for Downtown Miami filed by the DDA on November 25, 1986, pursuant to F.S. 380.06 (198-7 1997) CADA or Consolidated Application for Development Approval: The revised ADA prepared pursuant to paragraph 16 on page 13 herein. Certificate of Occupancy: A permanent or temporary and/or partial Certificate of Occupancy issued, pursuant to Section 307 of the South Florida Building Code, for any "Net New Development" as defined herein. City: The City of Miami, Florida. Council: The South Florida Regional Planning Council. DDA or Downtown Development Authority: The Downtown Development - 2 - 98- 219 Authority of the City of Miami, Florida. DERM: The Metropolitan Miami -Dade County Department of Environmental Resources Management. Development Credits: The individual units of land uses included within Total Allowable Development, as measured by square footage or number of dwelling units, hotel rooms, or seats. FDER: The Florida Department of Environmental Regulation. Major Use Special Permit: A special permit issued by the City Commission pursuant to Ordinance No_ 9500 11000, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, as amended. Net New Development: Any construction or reconstruction which will result in a net increase, within any "Parcel of Land", of residential dwelling units, hotel rooms, seats in attractions/recreation facilities or gross square footage for office, government office, retail/service, convention, wholesale/industrial or institutional uses. Land uses to be removed by demolition of a building or structure may be credited against the proposed new land uses for purposes of calculating the net increase, if the Planning Director determines that there was a valid Certificate of Occupancy existing on the effective date of this Development Order for the land uses to be demolished. If a change of land use is proposed, the Planning Director may credit the prior land use against the proposed land use based upon equivalent impacts as measured by peak hour vehicle trip generation. Any activity which has on the effective date of this Development Order a valid building permit or any currently effective Development Order shall not be included as Net New Development. The Planning Director may exclude from Net New Development any small development under 10,000 square feet in floor area, if he finds that such development would have no regional impact as measured by peak hour vehicle trips. - 3 - 98- 219 Parcel of Land: Any quantity of land capable of being described with such definiteness that its location and boundaries may be established, and which is designated by its owner or developer as land to be used or developed as a unit or which has been used or developed as a unit. Project: That Project described in the "PROJECT DESCRIPTION" on Page 1 herein. Project Area: The area included within the legal description in Exhibit 2. Total Allowable Development: The quantity of Net New Development for which Certificates of Occupancy may be issued under the terms and conditions of this Development Order, together with the applicable Master Development Order, as may be modified pursuant to F. S. 380.06 (19) (198^7 -997) , and which shall be measured by the following land uses: Office Government Office Retail/Service Hotel Residential Convention Wholesale/Industrial Institutional Attractions/Recreation Marine Facilities 6,677, 61,595,406 gross square feet 300,000 gross square feet 1,050,000 gross square feet 1,500 rooms 3,550 dwelling units 500,000 gross square feet 1,050,000 gross square feet 300,000 gross square feet 6,500 30,500 seats 230,000 gross square feet The City may permit simultaneous increases and decreases in the above described land use categories, provided that the regional impacts of the land uses as changed will not exceed the adverse - 4 - 98_. 219 regional impacts of the land uses in Increment I of the Project as originally approved, as measured by total peak hour vehicle trips. ACTION TAKEN: That, having made the conclusions of law set Increment I of the Project following conditions: findings of fact and reached the forth above, it is ordered that is hereby approved, subject to the THE CITY, ITS SUCCESSORS, AND/OR ASSIGNS JOINTLY OR SEVERALLY MAY ISSUE BUILDING PERMITS AND CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY FOR TOTAL ALLOWABLE DEVELOPMENT, PURSUANT TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THIS DEVELOPMENT ORDER TOGETHER WITH THE ATTENDANT MASTER DEVELOPMENT ORDER AND SHALL: 1. Require all development pursuant to this Development Order to be in accordance with applicable building codes, land development regulations, ordinances and other laws. •- •. •• .•. .• - - •- ��- .• e •- - 5 - 98- 219 -• ..,- - r- A.• .• •- Citv .r• •- -•. a-r • •unl r d - •!r - r. girwo-dus of developnext creditsfor office use iR rivrrp- tly ann-rnvprl r•- r n- - •.11-r • •- r -r r- U•- • •- - • r• • •- �. 11- r - - ► • ' r • • - r - • The Applinant,the City, the DCA and the Qperator bave agreed "on • - impact crpatpd by • - Special Daytime RyPntg and the rt-latPrl Land Use • -r-, rPCplirPd tQ 11 ! - • •-ge i=actq Tn the event t• - • • . • - • - Future \ • ' • - • - - • • 11 - • • • - - • in connection therewith will regtrict t'.We utilizatio-w of - 6 - 98- 219 - •1 • ' his ' ii• • • 11 • �. 11' 1 . 1 •' •' �. 1OJINIFUM • It•1 1 • • IS! •' �•' • •. • • - 7 - 98 - 219 E=loyges by / additional fran-gft-r•11 • - to Nor MOM •l • • • - • II • / • - / - U - 9TWI- • - III No III or • • • - • • / - • 11�11 • / • ' It • •Rginw-illow Im / sip III / - 8 - H- 219 •• • r_ • • - -• r r- �•.ir •.ir -lip- -r •uul -- •- r- -r •uul -- r_ -r r •- . •• r• • r• ilt- -• • -r. r- •- •All r• -r - olm r- a .0 _u• r• r • • - - r- - r- ••• r r_ -et - r. - r • r- - .••• r -• - -r - • •r r' •IU11 -- r• r. — 9 — 98- 219 Exhibit "B" Master Development Order INCREMENT I DEVELOPMENT ORDER NAME OF DEVELOPMENT: Downtown Miami NAME OF DEVELOPER: Downtown Development Authority of the City of Miami AUTHORIZED AGENT OF DEVELOPER: Patricia Allen, Executive Director, Downtown Development Authority and Lourdes Slazyk, Assistant Director, City of Miami Planning, Building and Zoning Department, or their successors. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The Project consists of development in Downtown Miami through the Year 2014, including the following land uses and increments: Increment I Increment II Increment III Land uses Buildout- Dec_ 30, 1999 Buildout- Dec_ 30, 2005 Buildout- Dec_ 30, 2014 Tntala Office 6, Gam, 27 3, 600,000 3,700,000 1: 3, 97-r 7 (gross square 6,595,406 13,895,406 feet) Government 300,000 250,000 200,000 750,000 Office (gross square feet) Retail/Service 1,050,000 400,000 500,000 1,950,000 (gross square feet) Hotel 1,500 500 1,100 3,100 (room) Residential 3,550 2,550 2,920 9,020 (dwelling units) Convention 500,000 0 0 500,000 (gross square feet) Wholesale/ 1,050,000 0 1,050,000 2,100,000 Industrial (gross square feet) Institutional 300,000 0 300,000 600,000 ( gross square feet) Attractions/ 6,60 1,600 5,000 4:3, 1 C)0 Recreation 30,500 37,100 ( seats ) Marine 230,000 230,000 Facilities Pursuant to F.S. 380.06 (22) (1987 1997), the Project specifies - 1 - 99- 219 the total amount of development planned for each land use category, but provides flexibility for such development to be located anywhere within the Project Area, subject to local land development regulations. The Project Area includes all property within the boundaries of the Downtown Development Authority, with the exception of that area between NE/NW 5th Street and I-395 known as "Park West", as illustrated on the map in Exhibit 1 and described in Exhibit 2 attached hereto. The Project Area contains a total of approximately 839 acres of land, including approximately 78 acres currently zoned and developed as City parks. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: See Exhibit 2. DEFINITIONS: For the purposes of this Development Order, the following terms shall be defined as follows: ADA or Application for Development Approval: The original Application for Development Approval for Downtown Miami filed by the DDA on November 25, 1986, pursuant to F.S. 380.06 (1987 1997) . CADA or Consolidated Application for Development Approval: The revised ADA prepared pursuant to paragraph 16 on page 13 herein. Certificate of Occupancy: A permanent or temporary and/or partial Certificate of Occupancy issued, pursuant to Section 307 of the South Florida Building Code, for any "Net New Development" as defined herein. City: The City of Miami, Florida. Council: The South Florida Regional Planning Council. DDA or Downtown Development Authority: The Downtown Development Authority of the City of Miami, Florida. - 2 - 98-- 219. DERM: The Metropolitan Miami -Dade County Department of Environmental Resources Management. Development Credits: The individual units of land uses included within Total Allowable Development, as measured by square footage or number of dwelling units, hotel rooms, or seats. FDER: The Florida Department of Environmental Regulation. Major Use Special Permit: A special permit issued by the City Commission pursuant to Ordinance No_ 9500 11000, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, as amended. Net New Development: Any construction or reconstruction which will result in a net increase, within any "Parcel of Land", of residential dwelling units, hotel rooms, seats in attractions/recreation facilities or gross square footage for office, government office, retail/service, convention, wholesale/industrial or institutional uses. Land uses to be removed by demolition of a building or structure may be credited against the proposed new land uses for purposes of calculating the net increase, if the Planning Director determines that there was a valid Certificate of Occupancy existing on the effective date of this Development Order for the land uses to be demolished. If a change of land use is proposed, the Planning Director may credit the prior land use against the proposed land use based upon equivalent impacts as measured by peak hour vehicle trip generation. Any activity which has on the effective date of this Development Order a valid building permit or any currently effective Development Order shall not be included as Net New Development. The Planning Director may exclude from Net New Development any small development under 10,000 square feet in floor area, if he finds that such development would have no regional impact as measured by peak hour vehicle trips. Parcel of Land: Any quantity of land capable of being described - 3 - 98- 219 with such definiteness that its location and boundaries may be established, and which is designated by its owner or developer as land to be used or developed as a unit or which has been used or developed as a unit. Project: That Project described in the "PROJECT DESCRIPTION" on Page 1 herein. Project Area: The area included within the legal description in Exhibit 2. Total Allowable Development: The quantity of Net New Development for which Certificates of Occupancy may be issued under the terms and conditions of this Development Order, together with the applicable Master Development Order, as may be modified pursuant to F.S. 380.06(19) (1987 1497), and which shall be measured by the following land uses: Office Government Office Retail/Service Hotel Residential Convention Wholesale/Industrial Institutional Attractions/Recreation Marine Facilities 6,677,7.-/'T 605950406 gross square feet 300,000 gross square feet 1,050,000 gross square feet 1,500 rooms 3,550 dwelling units 500,000 gross square feet 1,050,000 gross square feet 300,000 gross square feet 6,500 30,500 seats 230,000 gross square feet - 4 - 99-• 21.9 The City may permit simultaneous increases and decreases in the above described land use categories, provided that the regional impacts of the land uses as changed will not exceed the adverse regional impacts of the land uses in Increment I of the Project as originally approved, as measured by total peak hour vehicle trips. ACTION TAKEN: That, having made the findings of fact and reached the conclusions of law set forth above, it is ordered that Increment I of the Project is hereby approved, subject to the following conditions: THE CITY, ITS SUCCESSORS, AND/OR ASSIGNS JOINTLY OR SEVERALLY MAY ISSUE BUILDING PERMITS AND CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY FOR TOTAL ALLOWABLE DEVELOPMENT, PURSUANT TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THIS DEVELOPMENT ORDER TOGETHER WITH THE ATTENDANT MASTER DEVELOPMENT ORDER AND SHALL: 1. Require all development pursuant to this Development Order to be in accordance with applicable building codes, land development regulations, ordinances and other laws. piliz �l • - - • • - • • - - •� - • • - • • - • •110 - 5 - 98- 219 f ' • • f ! • f • • f - • f ' � 11 ' f � f ' • • ' • • f ' - ' f f ' • ' • • f •aft-04. •- --f /1 • u f• 11 • •- --• 11 • n f• 11 • u f' •- f • •Ilill f I.,••f- go ' f • f ' f � • • f f • 11 f f ' ► f f • ' • ' 11 11 11 f 11•- • ff •- �. 11' f f.. •- • • - • • • ' f - • f f11114L- I • f • f • 11 f • • f f • • ' f volf • 11 • ' . . • • - 6 - 98- 219 City will recplirL= i7be Qperat-or t7a submit a Special Daytime Rvpnt Traffic! Plan •' •' Daytimp The •' Daytime Plan will •p • • •'• by • Pvpntq tbat dcj not 11•. • 11 •-. . Wonaireoe pur,quant• r-onclifinn 19 nf the Major • • Permit nevelnjament Ordpr•r t-bFL Arena- I' •' Daytimp Plan will recognize the diffprpnt traffiv • . / • ' daytime, such ass a lang-,ihilit-y Daytimp Plan will algo •'1 parking availablim tn pat-rons during the daytime hnurg wbich, most likely, will • • ' vg-birlesq a further• / - • 11 the Arp-naThe SlaL-cial naytime Plan will algn •• /- • • • • -s* M Rpecial Rvpnt1 ; • / 11 ' / Police• • • of / - • 1 ' • 7 - 98- 219 la-m- will result in certain ppak bour t-raffic impacts; • II e=loyees, vendors1 • otbpr • ' • / / - / - 11 • • ' ' The Applicant., the City, the DCA and tW.e the nnn-pvpnt day volume (Using ar-tual Employee • _rar-f-pristics inst7parl of / ' f • _ • • in f / f ' / / ' • • • / • ' • • / 11 • • - - • f • • • / f • 11 • - • - 8 - 98- 219 PZ-17 TO FROM CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM Honorable Chairman and Members of the City Commission Jose Garcia-P City Manager I1:1K61TIU IV 10M.- eR DATE: February 12, 1998 FILE SUBJECT: public Hearing for Downtown DRI Amendment REFERENCES: City Commission Meeting ENCLOSURES: of February 24, 1998 It is respectfully requested that the City Commission approve the attached request to amend the Master and Increment I Development Orders of the Downtown Development of Regional Impact (DRI), with the conditions specified herein, in order to simultaneously increase and decrease the development credits in certain land use categories; the proposed change is necessary in order to approve the New American Airlines Arena proposed at approximately 601 Biscayne Boulevard. BACKGROUND At the City Commission Meeting of February 10, 1998, this item was continued for additional information. The requested information is in the attached report. JGP• lys 98- 219 REPORT TO CITY COMMISSION REGARDING AMENDMENT TO DOWNTOWN DRI This report has been prepared in response to concerns raised by the City Commission at its meeting of February 10, 1998. 1. Differences between Major Use Special Permit (MUSP) and DRI: The MUSP is a City of Miami Zoning Ordinance requirement in order to allow the Arena on the subject property. The City Commission is responsible for final approval of a MUSP and Development Order. It is completely within the discretion of the City Commission to attach reasonable conditions and safeguards to any MUSP and its accompanying Development Order. For purposes of the American Airlines Arena, the MUSP is the appropriate instrument to which the City Commission should attach specific conditions that Basketball Properties Inc. will be held responsible for. The applicant for the DRI Amendment (described below) is the Downtown Development Authority. M'I The Downtown DRI.is an instrument which was adopted in 1987 in order to expedite development within Downtown Miami by setting up a bank of credits in different land use categories from which developers can draw for new development activity. A MUSP does not typically need an accompanying DRI Amendment in order to build. The American Airlines Arena Project, however, due to the number of attraction seats required, did need such an amendment. Since the original applicant (and responsible entity) for Miami's areawide DRI was the Downtown Development Authority (DDA), they must also be the applicant for any amendments proposed to said DRI. The DRI amendment required for the Arena is solely for the purpose of exchanging land use credits in order to increase the number of attraction seats in the DRI while simultaneously decreasing the corresponding amount of office credits. Any proposed increase requires an equivalent decrease; for the purposes of this application, the deduction was made _ from the office category due to the tremendous amount of surplus credits in said category. 9 8,- 219 lb The Department of Community Affairs (DCA) was specifically concerned (as was the City) that a "Traffic Management Plan" be prepared and submitted for review and approval prior to commencement of activities at the Arena. The modified language in the conditions imposed in the DRI Amendment has been agreed to by DDA, DCA, the City of Miami Department of Planning and Development and the Arena operators. 2. Conditions for approval. As stated above, the language of the modified conditions imposed on this DRI Amendment were very specifically worded to respond to concerns raised by DCA. These conditions, as worded, have been agreed to by DDA, DCA, the City of Miami Department of Planning and Development and the Arena operators. 3. Costs incurred; fees paid to date. The following is a breakdown of all fees paid to date; these fees cover all administrative and out-of-pocket costs incurred by the City to date: a) Major Use Special Permit Fee $45,000 b) Plans review fee for MUSP $ 2,000 c) Surcharge for advertising $ 1,150 d) Mailing notice fee $ 147 e) DRI Amendment $ 5,000* f) Surcharge for advertising $ 1,150 g) Replatting fee $ 300 $54,747 * Missing $1,000 requested by letter to Judith A. Burke, Esquire, dated February 9, 1998. * Note: this does not include lobbyist registration fees paid to date. I 98- 219 4. Future costs expected to be incurred; fees due. Upon completion of the MUSP and DRI process, the Arena project will be submitting plans for building permits. In order to obtain permits, all Impact and DRI fees must be paid. The total estimated fees due to the City of Miami are approximately $1 million dollars. These fees cover all costs to be incurred by the City of Miami for review and approval of all necessary building permits (including inspections). The required impact fees will be utilized by the City for projects specified in the Capital Improvement Program for this Planning District. The City of Miami does not have a "Transportation Department" which is responsible for transportation improvements required on Biscayne Boulevard and I-395; these roads are federal roads under the jurisdiction of the State of Florida; all planned roadway improvements are being coordinated through the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) and done by FDOT; funds used for all improvements come from Federal and State sources - NO City funds are involved. The City of Miami, in conjunction with an intergovernmental committee established by DDA, has been meeting, and will continue to meet throughout the development of all of the major projects planned for Downtown Miami to assist FDOT in prioritizing planned roadway improvements. 5. Traffic Management Plan. As conditioned in both the MUSP and the proposed DRI Amendment, Basketball Properties Inc. is responsible for submitting to the City of Miami a comprehensive Traffic Management Plan for review and approval by the City Commission prior to the issuance of any type of Certificate of Occupancy for the Arena. The Administration will be setting up a review committee which will meet regularly to coordinate the development and review of the Arena's Traffic Management Plan. The parameters of said plan are outlined in the Development Order for the Arena. ,� 98- 219 13 6. Independent Traffic Study. In order for the City of Miami to produce an independent traffic study, a consultant would have to be hired; the City of Miami does not have sufficient in-house staff with the expertise required to conduct such a study. The approximate cost of such a study can range anywhere from $30,000 to $50,000. This particular effort for the proposed DRI amendment herein, would not be reasonable since the original Transportation Element of the Downtown DRI was prepared by the same consultant (David Plummer) as the study upon which this amendment is based. Staff review of the study which was completed and submitted thus far has concluded that the findings are acceptable; furthermore, as stated previously herein, and addressed through conditions, the only major component still missing is the "Traffic Management Plan". 7. Independent Study of surrounding area. In response to the specific concerns by Vice -Chairman Teele at the City Commission Meeting of February 10, 1998, the DDA, the Miami Heat and the City's Department of Planning and Development are in a position to proffer the following: An independent consultant, to be hired by the DDA and answerable only to the DDA, will be hired through an inter -local agreement to conduct a study of the area surrounding the Arena. The study should specifically focus on issues related to Capital Improvement needs required for linking the areas surrounding the Arena (including lighting, street and sidewalk improvements), design guides and standards for new private development in those areas and potential zoning incentives to attract pedestrian scale development with appropriate uses that could benefit by adjacency to the new Arena. The consultant services and study will be paid for by the Miami Heat, as proffered, and supplemented by City staff assistance as necessary. IQ., ,_ 96- 219 CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Chairman and Members of DATE: January 20, 1998 FILE: the City Commission SUBJECT: public Hearing for Downtown DRI Amendment FROM: REFERENCES: Cl Commission Meeting Jose Garcia -Pedro a City g City Manager ENCLOSURES: of February 10, 1998 RECOMMENDATION It is respectfully requested that the City Commission approve the attached request to amend the Master and Increment I Development Orders of the Downtown Development of Regional Impact (DRI) in order to simultaneously increase and decrease the development credits in certain land use categories; the proposed change is necessary in order to approve the New American Airlines Arena proposed at approximately 601 Biscayne Boulevard. BACKGROUND The Downtown DRI Amendment was on the City Commission Agenda of January 27, 1998, however due to a statutory requirement in the Florida Statutes, the City Commission adoption of this amendment requires a 15 day notice in the newspaper, not 10 days which is our local requirement. For that reason, this item is now properly before this City Commission for adoption. At the Planning Advisory Board Meeting of January 14, 1998, the Department of Planning and Development recommended approval of the proposed amendment, with conditions (see attached), in response to several concerns raised by the Department of Community Affairs; this recommendation was based on findings that the proposed amendment does not constitute a substantial deviation per Chapter 380, Florida Statutes and that it is consistent with the Miami Comprehensive Plan 1989-2000. Your approval is being requested in order to decrease the development credits in the "Office" land use category from 6,677,277 square feet to 6,595,406 square feet (a reduction of 81,871 square feet) and to simultaneously increase the development credits in the "Attractions/Recreation" category from 6,500 seats to 30,500 seats (an increase of 24,000 seats). JGP:1 s 97 88- 219 Z PLANNING FACT SHEET APPLICANT Downtown Development Authority HEARING DATE January 14, 1998. REQUEST/LOCATION Amendment to the Master and Increment I Development Orders of the Downtown Miami Development of Regional Impact. LEGAL DESCRIPTION N/A PETITION Consideration of amending the Downtown Miami Development of Regional Impact (DRI) in order to modify the development credits in certain land use categories by providing for a simultaneous increase and decrease accordingly; finding that these changes do not constitute a substantial deviation per Chapter 380, Florida Statutes, and that the changes are in conformity with the Miami Comprehensive Plan 1989-2000. PLANNING Approval. RECOMMENDATION BACKGROUND AND Please see attached analysis.. ANALYSIS PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD Approval with conditions VOTE: 6-0 CITY COMMISSION Continued from CC 2/10/98. APPLICATION NUMBER 97-061 Item #4 ...................................... -1........ -........................................................................................................................................................................ CITY OF MIAM1 - DEPARTMENT Or PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT - 444 SW 2NO AVENUE, 3- FLOOR - MIAMI, FLORIUA. 33130 PHONE (305) 416-1435 ............................ ............................................................................................................................ ........................: Dat.e:. ......0..1../08/98....................................... .... Page 1 98- 219 Zb RESOLUTION PAB - 04-98 A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL TO AMEND THE MASTER AND INCREMENT I DEVELOPMENT ORDER OF THE DOWNTOWN MIAMI DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT (DRI) IN ORDER TO MODIFY THE DEVELOPMENT CREDITS IN CERTAIN LAND USE CATEGORIES BY PROVIDING FOR A SIMULTANEOUS INCREASE AND DECREASE ACCORDINGLY; FINDING THAT THESE CHANGES DO NOT CONSTITUTE A SUBSTANTIAL DEVIATION PER CHAPTER 380, FLORIDA STATUTES, AND THAT THE CHANGES ARE IN CONFORMITY WITH THE MIAMI COMPREHENSIVE -PLAN 1989-2000 SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: (1) THAT IT IS UNDERSTOOD THAT THE AMERICAN AIRLINES ARENA (THE "ARENA") MAY BE UTILIZED FROM TIME TO TIME FOR FULL HOUSE (80% OF MORE OF THE 24,000 SEAT CAPACITY) SPECIAL EVENTS WHICH EITHER COMMENCE OR TERMINATE DURING THE HOURS OF 5:00 P.M. AND 6:00 P.M. (THE "SPECIAL EVENTS"). IN THE EVENT THE APPLICANT (IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE OPERATOR OF THE ARENA) ANTICIPATES THAT THE ARENA WILL BE UTILIZED FOR MORE THAN TEN (10) SUCH SPECIAL EVENTS IN ANY CALENDAR YEAR, THE APPLICANT OR ARENA OPERATOR SHALL SUBMIT AN AMENDMENT TO THE TRAFFIC STUDY SUBMITTED WITH THE NOTICE OF PROPOSED CHANGE (NOPC) DATED NOVEMBER 26, 1997. SUCH AMENDMENT, WHICH MUST BE JOINTLY APPROVED BY THE CITY OF MIAMI AND THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, MUST SHOW THAT SUCH ADDITIONAL SPECIAL EVENTS WILL HAVE NO NEGATIVE IMPACT ON THE SURROUNDING AREA. IN THE EVENT THAT THE APPLICANT FAILS TO SUBMIT SUCH AN AMENDMENT, IN ACCEPTABLE FORM THE OPERATOR OF THE ARENA SHALL BE PRECLUDED FROM HOLDING SUCH ADDITIONAL SPECIAL EVENTS UNTIL SUCH TIME AS A NOPC INCLUDING SUCH ADDITIONAL SPECIAL EVENTS IS APPROVED; (2) THAT THE "TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PLAN", TO BE SUBMITTED BY THE ARENA OPERATOR AS A CONDITION TO THE MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT FOR THE AMERICAN AIRLINES ARENA, PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A 3 2-19 Analysis for Case No. 97-061 Amendment to Master and Increment I Development Orders of the Downtown Miami Development of Regional Impact (DRI) . The proposed amendment to the Master and Increment I Development Orders of the Downtown Miami Development of Regional Impact (DRI) is in order to allow for the modification of development credits in certain land use categories by providing for a simultaneous increase and decrease accordingly. The requested change would specifically reduce the Office credits (square footage) by 81,871 square feet (from 6,677,277 sq.ft. to 6,595,406 sq.ft.) in order to increase the Attraction/Recreation seats by 24;000 seats (from 6,500 seats to 30,500 seats). This change is being sought specifically to accommodate the new proposed American Airlines Arena on the F.E.C. Tract within Downtown Miami. Please see that attached "Notification of a Proposed Change to a Previously Approved Development of Regional Impact (DRI)" for additional information and the methodology used to determine the modifications to the land use and development tables and the exchange rates. The Department of Planning and Development is recommending approval of the proposed amendment to the Master and Increment I Development Orders of the Downtown Miami Development of Regional Impact (DRI) finding that the proposed changes do not constitute a substantial deviation per Chapter 380, Florida Statutes, and that said proposal is consistent with the Downtown Miami Master Plan and the Goals, ' Objectives and Policies of the City of Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989- .. y 2000, as amended. 5 98- 219 Ar ^'ACC DOWNTOWN MIAMI DRI BOUNDARY MAP Jsi�S EXHIBIT 2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: Begin at the intersection of the centerlines of N.W. 5th Street and N.W. 3rd Avenue (east side of N-S Expressway (I-95)). said point of beginning also being the N.Y. corner of the district; thence run southerly along the center line of N.Y. 3rd Avenue and the easterly side of the N-S Expressway to the centerline of West Flagler Street; thence westerly along the centerline of said West Flagler Street to the centerline of the Miami River; thence meandering southeasterly along the centerline of said Miami River to a point of intersection with the easterly right-of-way (RN) line of Metro Rapid Transit R/W (formerly Florida East Coast (FEC) Railroad R/W) said R/W line being 50 feet easterly of and parallel with the centerline of said Metro Rapid Transit R/W; thence run southerly and southwesterly along said easterly R/W line of Metro Rapid Transit to the intersection with the centerline of S.Y. 15th Road; thence southeasterly along the centerline of 15th Road to a point of intersection with the southerly prolongation of the westerly line of COSTA BELLA DEVELOPMENT SUBDIVISION (107-14); thence northeasterly. northwesterly and northeasterly along said westerly line of COSTA BELLA to the intersection with the southerly right-of-way line of S.E. 14th Lane; thence southeasterly, northeasterly. northerly, and northwesterly along said southerly and westerly right-of-way line of S.E. 14th Lane and S.E. 14th Terrace to the intersection with the northwesterly property. line of Lot 31 Block 2 of Amended Plat of POINT VIEW as recorded in Plat Book 2 at Page 93 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida; thence northeasterly along the northwesterly line of said Lot 31 to the northeasterly side of the existing ten foot alley in Block 2 of said POINT VIEW; thence southeasterly along the northeasterly side of said ten foot alley to the intersection with the property line between Lots 4 and 5 of said Block 2 of POINT VIEW; thence north•ssterly aloe; :aid tine of Lots 4 and 5 and its prolongation thereof to the centerline of S.E. 14th Street; thence southeasterly along said centerline of S.E. 14th Street to a point of intersection with the existing bulkhead and shoreline of Biscayne Bay; thence meandering northerly along the existing bulkhead and shoreline of Biscayne Bay to a point of intersection with the southerly boundary of Claughton Island 98_ 219 Bridge; thence easterly along the said southerly RA line of Claughton Island Bridge to the intersection with the westerly bulkhead line of Claughton Island, said bulkhead line being part of the Metropolitan Dade County Bulkhead Line as recorded in Plat Book 73 at Page 18 of the Public Records; thence southerly, easterly, northerly and westerly, following said existing bulkhead and its westerly prolongation thereof around the island to the intersection with the mainland on the easterly shoreline of Biscayne Bay; thence meandering in a northwesterly and westerly direction along the shoreline of Biscayne Bay and the Miami River to the intersection with the easterly R/W line of Brickell Avenue Bridge (S.E. 2nd Avenue); thence north along said bridge to the existing bulkhead on the northerly shoreline of the Miami River; said bulk line also'being the southerly boundary of the Dupont Plaza Center and Miami Center Joint Venture property; thence northeasterly along the southerly boundary of Dupont Plaza Center and Miami Center Joint Venture property to a point of intersection with the easterly property line of Chopin Associates and Miami Center Limited Partnership; said property line being along the shoreline of .Biscayne Bay; thence northerly along said easterly property line of Chopin Associates and Miami Center Limited Partnership property along Biscayne Bay to the southerly property line Of Bayfront Park; thence continuing northerly, northeasterly and northwesterly along the bulkhead line of Bayfront Park and the Bayfront Park Miamarina; thence continuing northerly along the bulkhead line of Biscayne Bay to a point of intersection with the centerline of N.E. 17th Street extended easterly; thence westerly along the centerline of N.E. 17th Street and its extension thereof to the easterly R/W line of the FEC Railroad; thence southerly along the easterly R/W line of the FEC Railroad to the limited access right-of-way of I-395; thence southeasterly and easterly along the limited access right-of-way of I-39S to the centerline of Biscayne Boulevard, thence southerly along the centerline of Biscay' Boulevard to the centerline of N.E. Sth Street. thence westerly along the centerline and N.E. and N.W. Sth Street to the point of beginning. The above described area contains approximately 839 acres. November_� 1997 STATE OF FLORMA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS DIVISION OF RESOURCE PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT 2555 Shumard Oak Blvd. Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2100 (904) 488-4925 NOTIFICATION OF A PROPOSED CHANGE TO A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT (DRI) SUBSECTION 380.06(19), FLORIDA STATUTES Subsection 380.06(19), Florida Statutes, requires that submittal of a proposed change to a previously approved DRI be made to the local government, the regional planning agency, and the state land planning agency according to this form. 1) 1, Patricia Allen, Executive Director, authorized representative of the Downtown Development Authority, hereby give notice of a proposed change to a previously approved Development of Regional Impact in accordance with Subsection 380.06(19), Florida Statutes. In support thereof, I submit the following information concerning The Downtown Miami Development of Regional Impact, which information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. I aye submitted today, under separate cover, copies of this completed notification to h I City of Miami, the South Florida Regional Planning Council and to the Bureau of to Planning, Department of Community Affairs. (Signature) (Date) 2) Applicant (name, address, phone). Downtown Development Authority 200 South Biscayne Boulevard Suite 1818 Miami, Florida 33131 Phone: (305) 579-6675 9$- 2199r. 3) Authorized Agents (name, address, phone). Rafael Diaz, Esq. City of Miami Law Department 444 S.W. 2nd Avenue Ninth Floor Miami, Florida 33130 Phone: (305) Miami, Florida 33130 Judith A. Burke, Esq. Shutts & Bowen 201 S. Biscayne Blvd. Suite 1600 Miami, Florida 33131 (305) 358-6300 Lourdes Slazyk City of Miami Planning, Building and Zoning Department 444 S.W. 2nd Avenue Third Floor Phone: (305) 416-1435 David S. Plummer, P.E. David Plummer & Associates 1750 Ponce de Leon Blvd. Coral Gables, Florida 33134 Phone: (305) 447-0900 4) Location (City, County, Township/Range/Section) of approved DRI and proposed change. City of Miami Dade County, Florida Section 37, Township 53 South, Range 41 East 5) Provide a complete description of the proposed change. Include any proposed changes to the plan of development, phasing, additional lands, commencement date, build out date, development order conditions and requirements, or the representations contained in either the development order or the Application for Development Approval. Response: A. The Master Development Order (Resolution No. 91-698) should be changed to reflect a simultaneous increase in the land use category entitled "Attractions/Recreation" and a decrease in the land use category entitled "Office Space" provided in Increment I (See Exhibit "A" for explanation of calculations): (i) the number of seats permitted in Attractions/Recreation shall be increased by 24,000, resulting in a change from 6,500 seats to 30,500 seats permitted in Increment I; Office Uses _would be leased by 81,871 gross square feet, resulting in a change from 6,677,277 gross square feet to 6,595,406 gross square feet of office space permitted in Increment I. -2- 30 98- 219 Indicate such changes on the project master site plan, supplementing with other detailed maps, as appropriate. Additional information may be requested by the Department or any reviewing agency to clarify the nature of the change or the resulting impacts. A copy of the Downtown DRI Status Report is attached as Exhibit "B". No change in maps. 6) Complete the attached Substantial Deviation Determination Chart for all land use types approved in the development. If no change is proposed or has occurred, indicate no change. Response: See Substantial Deviation Determination Chart attached as Exhibit "C". 7) List all the dates and resolution numbers (or -other appropriate identification numbers) of all modification or amendments to the originally approved DRI development order that have been adopted by the local government, and provide a brief description of the previous changes (i.e., any information not already addressed in the Substantial Deviation Determination Chart). Has there been a change in local government jurisdiction for any portion of the development since the last approval or development order was issued? If so, has the annexing local government adopted a new DRI development order for the project? Rest se: Originally approved development orders: A. Master Development Order - Resolution 487-1148 December 10, 1987 B. Increment I Development Order - Resolution #87-1149 December 10,1987 Modifications: C. Stipulation of Settlement, Department of Community Affairs vs. The City of Miami and the Downtown Development Authority, State of Florida Division of Administrative Hearings Case No. 88-1638, June 2,1988 (This settlement clarified the meanings of Total Allowable Development, Net New Development and Aggregate Exclusions as applied in the development orders.) -3- 98- 219 31 D. Resolution No. 91-698, passed and adopted by the Commission of the City of Miami, Florida on September 26,1991, which approved the following changes to the Master Development Order and the Increment I Development Order: (1) Updated the name of the authorized agent of developer to Matthew Schwartz; and updated the name of the Planning, Building and Zoning Department. (2) An extension of the build out/termination date of the Increment I development order from December 31, 1992, to December 30, 1997. (3) An extension of the date until which the City agreed that the grantees of building permits or Major Use Special Permits for new development under the Increment I Development Order shall not be subject to down -zoning, unit density reduction or intensity reduction from December 31, 1992, to December 30, 1997. (4) An extension of the deadline for completing air quality monitoring from March 15, 1991 to March 15, 1994. (5) Extension of the time to contract for construction of transportation improvements from four years to eight years from the effective date of the Development Order (see condition 6 on page 10 of the Increment I development order). (6) Simultaneous increases and decreases in the proposed land uses in Increment I: (I) Attractions and Recreation facilities increased from 3,400 seats to 6,500 seats, and Hotels increased from 1,000 rooms to 1,500 rooms. (ii) Office uses decreased by 180,450 square feet, resulting in a change from 7,100,000 square feet to 6,919,550 square feet of office space permitted in Increment I. E. Resolutions No. 94-849 and 94-850, passed and adopted by the Commission of the City of Miami, Florida on November 17, 1994, which approved the following changes to the Master Development Order and the Increment I Development Order: (1) An extension of the build out/termination date of the Increment I development order from December 30, 1997, to December 30,1999. -4- 32. y v 98- 219 (2) An extension of the date until which the City agreed that the grantees of building permits or Major Use Special Permits for new development under the Increment I Development Order shall not be subject to down -zoning, unit density reduction or intensity reduction from December 30, 1997, to December 30, 1999. (3) An extension of the deadline for completing air quality monitoring from March 15, 1994 to March 15, 1997. (4) Extension of the time to contract for construction of transportation improvements from eight years to ten years from the effective date of the Development Order (see condition 6 on page 10 of the Increment I development order). (5) Simultaneous increases and decreases in the proposed land uses in Increment I: (1) Marine Facility was added as a new land use encompassing a 230,000 square foot terminal building; (ii) Office Uses decreased by 242,273 square feet resulting in a change from 6,919,550 square feet to 6,677,277 square feet of office space permitted in Increment I. 8) Describe any lands purchased or optioned within 1/4 mile of the original DRI site subsequent to the original approval or issuance of the DRI development order. Identify such land, its size, intended use, and adjacent non -project land uses within'/2 mile on a project master site plan or other map. Response: Not applicable. 9) Indicate if the proposed change is less than 40% (cumulatively with other previous changes) of any criteria listed in 380.06(19)(b), Florida Statutes. Response: -5- 98- 219 -�✓ Individually, the proposed increase to the Attraction/Recreation is more than 40% of the criteria in 380.06(19)(b); however, with the simultaneous decrease in Office land use, the proposed changes are less than 40%. Do you believe this notification of change proposes a change which meets the criteria of Subparagraph 380.06(19)(e)2., F.S. YES NO X 10) Does the proposed change result in a change to the build out date or any phasing date of the project? If so, indicate the proposed new build out or phasing dates. Rest: No. 11) Will the proposed change require an amendment to the local government comprehensive plan? Response: No. 12) An updated master site plan or other map of the development portraying and distinguishing the proposed changes to the previously approved DRI or development order conditions. Response: Map H-Master Land Use Plan (Exhibit Q has not changed since the originally approved development orders. 13) Pursuant to Subsection 380.06(19)(0, F.S., include the precise language that is being proposed to be deleted or added as an amendment to the development order. This language should address and quantify: a. All proposed specific changes to the nature, phasing, and build out date of the development; to development order conditions and requirements; to commitments and representations in the Application for Development Approval; to the acreage attributable to each described proposed change of land use, open space, areas for preservation, green belts; to structures or to other improvements including locations, square footage, number of units; and other major characteristics or components of the proposed change; Rest: 0 ,e 98- 219 See Exhibit "E" for draft of Resolution and drafts of the Amended Master Development Order and the Increment I Development Order which are attached to the Resolution as Exhibits. b. An updated legal description of the property, if any project acreage is/has been added or deleted to the previously approved plan of development; Not applicable. C. A proposed amended development order deadline for commencing physical development of the proposed changes, if applicable; Response: Not applicable. d. A proposed amended development order termination date that reasonably reflects the time required to complete the development; Not applicable. e. A proposed amended development order date until which the local government agrees that the changes to the DRI shall not be subject to down -zoning, unit density - reduction, or intensity reduction, if applicable; and Respo se: Not applicable. f. Proposed amended development order specifications for the annual report, including the date of submission, contents, and parties to whom the report is submitted as specified in Subsection 9J-0.025 (7), F.A.C. Not applicable. MIA96 149072.2 - L1M 11l26197 9FJ1 98- 219 r EXHIBIT "A" Explanation of Addition and Decrease of Land Use The Increment I development order (Res.487-1149), page 3, allows the City to simultaneously increase and decrease certain land uses, "provided that the regional impacts of the land uses as changed will not exceed the adverse regional impacts of the land uses in Increment I of the project as originally approved, as measured by total peak hour vehicle trips". The land use exchange for office use as established in Increment I to allow the simultaneous increase and decrease in land use, and shown on Table 1 attached, is 0.0005985 trips per square foot. By dividing the 49 p.m. peak hour trips associated with the 24,000 additional seats needed for the Arena by the office trips per square foot, it is found that the office land use category must be reduced by 81,871 square feet to allow the American Airlines Arena, ( 49 p.m. peak hour trips/0.0005985 trips per gross square foot of office equals 81,871 square feet of office use). In other words, to accommodate the 49 p.m. peak hour trips in the recreation/seats land use category, an equivalent reduction of 49 p.m. peak hour trips would be achieved by deducting 81,871 gross square feet from the office use category; thus a total of 6,595,406 gross square feet of office use is proposed. The American Airlines Arena events occur outside of the p.m. peak hour. The only additional trips generated by the project during peak hour are incidental to certain accessory uses. Those accessory uses include the approximate 40,000 square feet of retail space at the project. 10,000 square feet of that space is located inside the ticket secure area and 30,000 is located adjacent to the arena bowl. In addition, there will be approximately 37,500 square feet of office space located at the project. 7,500 square feet of that office space will be utilized for the arena management offices and 30,000 square feet will be used for the Heat and other franchise offices. There is more than sufficient capacity under Increment I for both of these uses. 1,006,817 square feet of retail space has been approved and is available. The 40,000 square feet of retail contemplated for this project can easily be deducted from that amount. 6,595,406 square feet of office space is still available under Increment I, even after this amendment. The 37,500 square feet of office space included in this project can clearly be deducted from that amount. Although it is clear that the regional impacts of the land uses as changed by this amendment will not exceed the adverse regional impacts of the land uses in Increment I, the applicant has undertaken a traffic study in order to overcome any presumption that this amendment constitutes a substantial deviation. The traffic study is entitled "Maritime Park Arena Traffic Analysis" and is attached as Exhibit "A-1". Although not required to do so under the provisions of the Downtown DRI, the Traffic Analysis studies all adjacent intersections to ensure that the level of service is satisfactory. The analysis also addresses all mitigation required for those adjacent intersections. The data provided in the Traffic Analysis clearly demonstrates that this amendment does not constitute a substantial deviation. 9g- 20 :37 In addition to the Maritime Park Arena Traffic Analysis, the applicant is submitting an outline of the proposed Transportation Management Plan, attached as Exhibit "A-2", as well as an outline of the development strategies which promote linkages between the project and the Downtown/Southeast Overtown Park West Community, attached as Exhibit "A-3". MIA95 160783 4 - L1 M 11/26/97 -2- 98- 219 Exhibit "B" DOWNTOWN DRI ANNUAL STATUS REPORT UPDATED THROUGH OCTOBER 1997 A. Current Status of Increment I Development Credits (as indicated in Development Order amendments through OCTOBER 1997): Land Use Total Reserved with Reserved with Unreserved Allowable MUSP or CII Building Permit Credits or completed Office (GSF) 6,677,277 17,426 (1) 6,659,851 Gov't Office (GSF) 300,000 300,000 Retail (GSF) 1,050,000 14,052 (2) - 3335 (3) 1,007,227 4,430 (1) 7807 (4) 13,149(5) Hotel (rooms) 1,500 325 rooms (1) 1175 rooms Residential (units) 3,550 508 units (1) 356 units (4) 941 units 599 units (2) 297 units (3) 641 units (5) 80 units (6) 128 units (7) Convention (GSF) 500,000 500,000 Wholesale/Industrial 1,050,000 1,050,000 (GSF) Institutional (GSF) 300,000 300,000 Attraction/Recreation 6,500 6,500 seats (seats) Marine Facilities (GSF) 230,000 230,000 (1) Brickell on the River Project (5) Brickell Bay Plaza (2) Brickell Point Project (6) Olympia Building (3) Fortune House (7) Congress Building (4) Yacht Club at Brickell B. Proposed and/or pending applications for development credits: Land Use Total Total Reserved Pending Total Remaining Allowable (from "A" above) applications or Credits (as amended) planned projects Office (GSF) 6,677,277 17,426 372,788(4) 6,240,863 8,700(2) 37,500(6) Government Office (GSF) 300,000 300,000 Retail (GSF) 1,050,000 42,773 200,000 (1) 726,845 16,955(3) 4,605(2) 18,822(4) 40,000(6) Hotel (rooms) 1,500 325 rooms 246 rooms (4) 929 rooms Residential (units) 3,550 2,609 units 355 units (2) -203 units 749 units (3) 40 units (4) Convention (GSF) 500,000 500,000 Wholesale/Industrial 1,050,000 1,050,000 (GSF) Institutional (GSF) 300,000 300,000 Attraction/Recreation 6,500 4,880 seats (5) -22380 seats (seats) 24,000 seats (6) Marine Facilities (GSF) 230,000 230,000 (1) Brickell Commons Project (in application process) (2) Yacht Club II Project (application filed 9/19/97) (3) Bayshore Palms Project (application filed 11/04/97) (4) Terremark II (application filed 10/31/97) (5) Performing Arts Center (in application process) (6) American Airlines Arena (application filed 11/5/97) 98- 219 EXHIBIT "C" SUBSTANTIAL DEVIATION DETERMINATION CHART ,..1 Cat t 00 TYPE OF CHANGE PROPOSED ORIGINAL PLAN PREVIOUS D.O. LAND USE CATEGORY PLAN CHANGE + DATE Attraction/ #Parking Spaces Recreation #Spectators *Seats 30,500 3,400 6,500 Site Locational changes Acreage, including drainage, ROW, easement, etc. #External Vehicle Trips 49 p.m. 7 p.m. peak hour 14 p.m. peak D.O. conditions peak hour hour ADA representations Airports Runway (length) Not Applicable Runway (strength) Terminal (gross square feet) # Parking Spaces - # Gates Apron Area (gross square feet) Site locational changes Airport Acreage, including drainage, ROW, easement, etc. # External Vehicle Trips D.O. conditions ADA representations TYPE OF LAND -USE CHANGE CATEGORY PROPOSED ORIGINAL PLAN PLAN PREVIOUS D.O. C4 CHANGE + DATE Hospitals # Beds Not Applicable 1 pp # Parking Spaces O� Building (gross square feet) Site locational changes Acreage, including drainage, ROW, easements, etc. # External Vehicle Trips D.O. conditions ADA representations Industrial Acreage, including drainage, ROW, Not Applicable easements, etc. # Parking Spaces Building (gross square feet) # Employees Chemical storage (barrels and lbs.) Site locational changes # External Vehicle Trips D.O. conditions ADA representations Mining Operations Acreage mined (year) Not Applicable Water Withdrawal (gallday) Size of Mine (acres), including drainage, ROW, easements, etc. Site locational changes # External Vehicle Trips D.O. conditions ADA representations -2- G� z TYPE OF CHANGE LAND USE CATEGORY PROPOSED ORIGINAL PLAN PLAN PREVIOUS D.O. CHANGE + DATE Office Acreage, including drainage, ROW, easements, etc. Building (gross square feet) 6,595,406 sq. ft. 7,100,000 sq. ft. 6,919,550 sq. ft. # Parking Spaces (1991) # Employees 6,677,277 sq. ft. Site locational changes (1994) # External Vehicle Trips 3,348 p.m. peak hour 4,250 p.m. peak hour D.O. conditions see Exhibit A 4,142 p.m. peak ADA representations see Exhibit A hour (1991) & 3,397 p.m. peak hour (1994) Petroleum/Chem. Storage Capacity Storage (barrels and/or lbs.) Distance to Navigable Water (feet) Site locational changes Facility Acreage, including drainage, ROW, easements, etc. # External Vehicle Trips D.O. conditions ADA representations Not Applicable -3- O'� Cq 1 TYPE OF CHANGE LAND USE CATEGORY PROPOSED ORIGINAL PLAN PLAN PREVIOUS D.O. 19-4 CHANGE + DATE Get Ports (Marinas) # boats, wet storage 1 # boats, dry storage Dredge and fill (cu. yds.) Petroleum storage (gals.) Site locational changes Port Acreage, including drainage, Not Applicable ROW, easements, etc. # External Vehicle Trips Not Applicable D.O. conditions ADA representations Residential # dwelling units Not Applicable Type of dwelling units # lots Acreage, including drainage, ROW, easements,. etc. Site locational changes # External Vehicle Trips D.O. Conditions Wholesale, Retail, Acreage, including drainage, ROW, Not Applicable Service easements, etc. Floor Space (gross square feet) # Parking Spaces # Employees Site locational changes # External Vehicle Trips D.O. conditions ADA representations -4- TYPE OF CHANGE LAND USE CATEGORY PROPOSED ORIGINAL PLAN PLAN PREVIOUS D.O. CHANGE + DATE G�2 Hotel/Motel # Rental Units Not Applicable 1,000 rooms 1,500 rooms I Floor Space (gross square feet) 00 # Parking Places # Employees Site locational changes Acreage, including drainage, ROW easements, etc. # External Vehicle Trips Not Applicable 202 p.m. peak hour 303 p.m. peak D.O. conditions hour ADA representations R.V. Park Acreage, including drainage, ROW, Not Applicable easements, etc. # Parking Spaces Building (gross square feet) # Employees Site locational changes # External Vehicle Trips D.O. conditions ADA representations Open Space (All Acreage Not Applicable natural and Site locational changes getated non- Type of open space pervious D.O. conditions surfaces) ADA representations -5- TYPE OF CHANGE PROPOSED ORIGINAL PLAN PREVIOUS D.O. LAND USE CATEGORY PLAN CHANGE + DATE Preservation, Acreage Not Applicable Buffer or Special Site locational changes Protection Areas Development of site proposed D.O. conditions ADA representations N( If a response is to be more than one sentence, attach a detailed description of each proposed change and copies of the proposed modified site plan drawings. The Bureau may request additional information from the developer or his agent. MIA95 152487.2 - LIM 9/16197 Fol O� M-r a 7 \` tic: � �Iv caceL,J lw _CIENTRAL COwttICIA,. I+ION INTtNtITr CaNTIIAL COYl/tRCIAt. MOOt11AT11 INTIRNt1TY L SINAL COrrtNCtAL W"O"SALUMOWSTA.AL) OOvtaNtrt11T O/alC=/ IN:TITVT1014AL UM - $PtCIAL IMIX10 utt ® WTAIL ® POW Orl/ ^Ar1/ A/r Ar�� t� �''� tiI/� � w� A �IFAr Awt i�► tlt� r �IIIN� &~aft N� MAP H - MASTER LAND USE PLAN 4 R DOWN TOWN MA STER PLAN DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT 98- 210 q7 EXHIBIT "E" RESOLUTION NO.98- A RESOLUTION, WITH ATTACHMENTS, AMENDING THE DOWNTOWN MIAMI DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT (DRI) MASTER AND INCREMENT I DEVELOPMENT ORDERS (RESOLUTIONS 87-1148 AND 87-1149 ADOPTED DECEMBER 109 1987, AS AMENDED BY RESOLUTION 91-698 ADOPTED SEPTEMBER 26, 1991 AND RESOLUTION 94-849 ADOPTED NOVEMBER 17, 1994), FOR THE AREA OF THE CITY OF MIAMI UNDER THE JURISDICTION OF THE DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE SOUTHEAST OVERTOWNIPARK WEST REDEVELOPMENT AREA); BY AMENDING THE MASTER AND INCREMENT I DEVELOPMENT ORDER BY SIMULTANEOUSLY INCREASING AND DECREASING THE QUANTITIES OF DEVELOPMENT IN CERTAIN LAND USE CATEGORIES IN INCREMENT I; FINDING THAT THESE CHANGES DO NOT CONSTITUTE SUBSTANTIAL DEVIATIONS PER CHAPTER 380, FLORIDA STATUTES (1993), AND ALSO FINDING THAT THESE CHANGES ARE IN CONFORMITY WITH THE MIAMI COMPREHENSIVE NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN 1989-2000. WHEREAS, on December 10, 1987, the City Commission adopted Resolution No. 87- 1148 approving a Master development order for the Downtown Miami Development of Regional Impact, and Resolution No., 87-1149 approving the Increment I development order for the Downtown Miami Development of Regional Impact; and WHEREAS, there is a need to increase the number of seats in the attraction/recreation land use category to accommodate proposed new development, while there is a surplus of unused development in the office land use category; and WHEREAS, the simultaneous increase and decrease in the aforementioned land use categories is compatible with the uses designated for the downtown area and does not conflict with the land use designations for the area as designated in the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000 Future Land Use Plan Map; and WHEREAS, the Miami Planning Advisory Board, at its meeting held on December _, 1997, following an advertised public hearing, adopted Resolution No. PAB — 97 by a vote of (__) to (_) RECOMMENDING of the proposed amendments 98- 219 q q to the Master and Increment I Development Orders for the Downtown Miami Development of Regional Impact as attached hereto; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Subsection 380.06(19), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1993), on November 26, 1997, the Downtown Development Authority submitted a "Notification of a Proposed Change to a Previously Approved DRI," to the City of Miami, the South Florida Regional Planning Council, and the Florida Department of Community Affairs; and WHEREAS, on , 1998, the Miami City Commission held a public hearing on the proposed amendments to the Master and Increment I development orders for the Downtown Miami Development of Regional Impact as attached hereto; and WHEREAS, the City Commission determined that all requirements of notice and other legal requirements have been complied with for an amendment to the Master and Increment I development orders for the Downtown Miami Development of Regional Impact; and WHEREAS, the City Commission deems it advisable and in the best public interest, and the general welfare of the City of Miami to amend the Master and Increment I development orders for the Downtown Miami Development of Regional Impact as hereinafter set forth; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. The recitals and findings contained in the Preamble to this Resolution are hereby adopted by reference thereto and incorporated herein as if fully set forth in this Section. Section 2. The proposed amendments to the Master development order for the Downtown Miami Development of Regional Impact (Resolution 87-1148, as amended by Resolution 91-698 and Resolution 94-849), which are attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and made a part hereof, do not constitute a substantial deviation and, therefore, do not require further development of regional impact review pursuant to Subsection 380.06(19), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1993). These amendments are in conformity with the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000. Section 3. The attached amendments to the Master development order for the Downtown Miami Development of Regional Impact (Exhibit "A") are hereby approved. Section 4. The proposed amendments to the Increment I development order for the Downtown Miami Development of Regional Impact (Resolution No. 87-1149), which are attached hereto as Exhibit "B" and made a part hereof, do not constitute a substantial deviation and therefore, do not require further development of regional impact review -2- 5c) 98219 pursuant to Subsection 380.06(19), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1993). These amendments are in conformity with the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000. Section 5. The attached amendments to the Increment I development order for the Downtown Miami Development of Regional Impact (Exhibit "B") are hereby approved. PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of , 1998 ATTEST: WALTER J. FOEMAN, CITY CLERK PREPARED AND APPROVED BY: RAFAEL DIAZ DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: A. QUINN JONES, III CITY ATTORNEY MIA95 149842.1 - UM 11/26197 -3- XAVIER L. SUAREZ, MAYOR 98- 219 5 Exhibit "A" Master Development Order MASTER DEVELOPMENT ORDER NAME OF DEVELOPMENT: Downtown Miami NAME OF DEVELOPER: Downtown Development Authority of the City of Miami AUTHORIZED AGENT OF DEVELOPER: Patricia Allen, Executive Director, Downtown Development Authority and Lourdes SlaQJ, Assistant Director, City of Miami Planning, Building and Zoning Department, or their successors. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The Project consists of development in Downtown Miami through the Year 2014, including the following land uses and increments: Land uses Office (gross square feet) - Government Office (gross square feet)- Retail/Service (gross square feet) Hotel (room) Residential (dwelling units) Convention (gross square feet) Wholesale/ Industrial (gross square feet) Institutional ( gross square feet) Attract ions/Recreation ( seats ) Marine Facilities Increment I Increment 11 Increment lII Buildout- Buildout- Buildout- Dec. 30. 1999 Dec. 30, 2005 Dec. 30, 2014 Totals 6,6F7-,3F7 3,600,000 13,476,024 6.595A06 13J95A06 300,000 250,000 200,000 750,000 11050,000 400,000 500,000 1,950,000 11500 500 1,100 3,100 3,550 2,550 2,920 9,020 500,000 0 0 500,000 1,050,000 0 1,050,000 2,100,000 300,000 0 300,000 600,000 6;50 1,600 5,000 !3,100 30500 37,100 230,000 230,000 1 98- 219 53 Pursuant to F.S. 380.06(22) (1987), the Project specifies the total amount of development planned for each land use categt but provides flexibility for such de ipment to be located anywhere within the Project Area, subject to local land development regulations. The Project Area includes all property within the boundaries of the Downtown Development Authority, with the exception of that area between NE/NW 5th Street and I-395 known as "Park West", as illustrated on the map in Exhibit 1 and described in Exhibit 2 attached hereto. The Project Area contains a total of approximately 839 acres of land, including approximately 78 acres currently zoned and developed as City parks. 2 98- 219 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: See Exhibit 2. DEFINITIONS: For the purposes of this Development Order, the following terms shall be defined as follows: ADA or Application for Development Approval: The original Application for Development Approval for Downtown Miami filed by the DDA on November 25, 1986, pursuant to F.S. 380.06 (1987). CADA or Consolidated Application for Development Approval: The revised ADA prepared pursuant to paragraph 16 on page 13 herein. Certificate of Occupancy: A permanent or temporary and/or partial Certificate of Occupancy issued, pursuant to Section 307 of the South Florida Building Code, for any "Net New Development" as defined herein. it : The City of Miami, Florida. Council: The South Florida Regional Planning Council. DDA or Downtown Development Authority: The Downtown Development Authority of the City of Miami, Florida. DERM: The Metropolitan Dade County Department of Environmental Resources Management. Development Credits: The individual units of land uses included within Total Allowable Development, as measured by square footage or number of dwelling units, hotel rooms, or seats. FDER: The Florida Department of Environmental Regulation. Major Use Special Permit: A special permit issued by the City Commission pursuant to Ordinance 9500, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, as amended. K 98- 219 5.� Net New Development: Any construction or reconstruction which will result in a, net increase, within any "Parcel of Land", of residential dwelling units, hotel rooms, seats in attractions/recreation facilities or gross square footage for office, government office, retail/service, convention, wholesale/industrial or institutional uses. Land uses to be removed by demolition of a building or structure may be credited against the proposed new land uses for purposes of calculating the net increase, if the Planning Director determines that there was a valid Certificate of Occupancy existing on the effective date of this Development Order for the land uses to be demolished. If a change of land use is proposed, the Planning Director may credit the prior land use against the proposed land use based upon equivalent impacts as measured by peak hour vehicle trip generation. Any activity which has on the effective date of this Development Order a valid building permit or any currently effective development order shall not be included as Net New Development. The Planning Director may exclude from Net New Development any small development under 10,000 square feet in floor area, if he finds that such development would have no regional impact as measured by peak hour vehicle trips. Parcel of Land: Any quantity of land capable of being described with such definiteness that its location and boundaries may be established, and which is designated by its owner or developer as land to be used or developed as a unit or which has been used or developed as a unit. Project: That Project described in the "PROJECT DESCRIPTION" on Page 1 herein. Project Area: The area included within the legal description in Exhibit 2. 4 98- 219 Total Allowable Development: The quantity of Net New Development for which Certificates of Occupancy may be issued under the terms and conditions of this Development Order, together with the applicable Master Development Order, as may be modified pursuant to-F. S. 380.06(19) (1987), and which shall be measured by the following land uses: Office Government Office Retail/Service Hotel Residential Convention Wholesale/Industrial Institutional Attractions/Recreation Marine Facilities 6;67 6.595.406 gross square feet 300,000 gross square feet 1,050,000 gross square feet 1,500 rooms 3,550 dwelling units 500,000 gross square feet 1,050,000 gross square feet 300,000 gross square feet 6-,50 30.500 seats 230,000 gross square feet The City may permit simultaneous increases and decreases in the above described land use categories, provided that the regional impacts of the land uses as changed will not exceed the adverse regional impacts of the land uses in Increment I of the Project as originally approved, as measured by total peak hour vehicle trips. FINDINGS OF FACT: The following findings of fact are hereby confirmed and adopted with respect to the Project: 5 98- 219 57 A. The findings and determinations of fact set forth in the recitals of the resolution to this Development Order are hereby confirmed. B. The real property which is the subject of this Development Order is legally described in Exhibit 2. C. The DDA riled the ADA with the City, the Council, and the Florida Department of Community Affairs. D. The CADA has been filed by the DDA pursuant to F.S. 380.06(22) (1987) authorizing a downtown development authority to apply for development approval and receive a development order for any or all of the area within its jurisdiction. Individual developments are not identified or required to be identified in the CADA. E. The purpose of the CADA is to identify and assess probable regional impacts and to obtain approval for Total Allowable Development in accordance with the general guidelines set forth in this Development Order and the CADA. The concept is to recognize the Project Area as a single area of high intensity development and to focus the DRI review process primarily on the impacts that Total Allowable Development within the area will have on land, water, transportation, environmental, community services, energy and other resources and systems of regional significance. The CADA seeks a single DRI review process for overall phased development of the downtown area rather than requiring each individual DRI scale development within the downtown area to file for separate DRI reviews. F. Development within the Project Area is expected to continue to be accomplished over an extended period of time by a variety of developers, which may include the City. These developers may respond to market demand and technologies that can only be estimated in the CADA. The CADA is intended to serve as a flexible guide to planned development of the Project Area rather than a precise blueprint for its development. Therefore, pursuant to F.S. 380.06(21)(b) (1987), the CADA seeks master development approval for three increments of development over a period of approximately twenty years and specific development approval for Increment I, which is the first phase of development projected for a period of approximately five 6 98- 219 G. I. U K. L. M. N. O. P. Q. R. years. Subsequent incremental applications may need to be adjusted to more nearly serve as a living guide recognizing the evolution of market demand and technologies. The Project Area contains a total of approximately 839 acres, including approximately 78 acres presently zoned and developed as City parks. The CADA proposes Net New Development within the Project Area for the land uses, quantities and phases defined herein as Total Allowable Development. The Project is not located in an area of critical state concern as designated pursuant to F.S. 390 (1987). A comprehensive review of the probable impacts that will be generated by Increment I of the Project has been conducted by various City departments, as reflected in the CADA, and the South Florida Regional Planning Council staff. This Development Order is consistent with the report and recommendations of the South Florida Regional Planning Council, entitled "Development of Regional Impact Assessment for Downtown Miami - Increment I," dated October 5, 1987. The South Florida Regional Planning Council recommends approval of Increment I of the Project, and all conditions to which such approval is subject are reflected herein. Increment I of the Project is consistent with the applicable portion of the State land development plan and the Regional Plan for South Florida. Increment I of the Project is in conformity with the adopted Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan. Increment I of the Project is in accord with the district zoning classifications of Zoning Ordinance 9500, as amended. Increment I of the Project will have a favorable impact on the economy of the City. Increment I of the Project will efficiently use public transportation facilities. Increment I of the Project will favorably affect the need for people to find adequate housing reasonably accessible to their places of employment. Increment I of the Project will efficiently use necessary public facilities. Increment I of the Project will include adequate mitigative measures to assure that it will not adversely effect the environment and natural resources of the City. F 219 59 S. Increment I of the Project will not adversely affect living conditions in the City. T. Increment I of the Project will not adversely affect public safety. U. There is a public need for Increment I of the Project. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW: That, having made the findings of fact contained above, the City Commission hereby concludes as a matter of law, the following: A. The DDA constitutes a "downtown development authority" as defined in F.S. 380 (1987), and is authorized by F.S. 380 (1987) to make application for development approval and receive a development order. B. Increment I of the Project complies with the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan, is consistent with the orderly development and goals of the City of Miami, and complies with local land development regulations. C. Increment I of the Project does not unreasonably interfere with the achievement of the objectives of the adopted State land development plan applicable to the City of Miami and the Regional Plan for South Florida D. Increment I of the Project is consistent with the report and recommendations of the South Florida Regional Planning Council and does not unreasonably interfere with any of the considerations and objectives set forth in F.S. 380 (1987). ACTION TAKEN: That, having made the findings of fact and reached the conclusions of law set forth above, it is ordered that Increment I of the Project is hereby approved, subject to the following conditions: THE CITY, ITS SUCCESSORS, AND/OR ASSIGNS JOINTLY OR SEVERALLY MAY ISSUE BUILDING PERMITS AND CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY FOR TOTAL ALLOWABLE DEVELOPMENT, PURSUANT TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THIS DEVELOPMENT ORDER TOGETHER WITH THE ATTENDANT MASTER DEVELOPMENT ORDER AND SHALL: 8 98- 219 l9 1. 2. 3. Require all development pursuant to this Development Order to be in accordance with applicable building codes, land development regulations, ordinances and other laws. For the purpose of base -line data collection, conduct air quality monitoring for carbon monoxide (CO) concentrations based on the following requirements: a. CO monitoring data shall be provided for each of the three (3) sub -areas as described in the CADA Brickell, the Central Business District and Omni. b. The monitoring shall consist of four (4) weeks of data collection during the winter months, November 15th through March 15th, for each sub -area. C. The monitoring for each sub -area shall be completed prior to the issuance of any certificate of occupancy within that sub -area for the first development under this Development Order which meets 100 percent of the presumptive threshold for Developments of Regional Impact pursuant to Rule 27F, F.A.C., within that sub -area; or prior to March 15, 1997, whichever comes first. d. The monitor will be located at the presumed worst case intersection for the Brickell and Omni sub -areas. The location will be selected jointly by the City, Florida Department of Environmental Resources Management (DERM), and Council staff. It has been agreed by these agencies that the existing monitor located in the Central Business District will be acceptable for that sub -area. e. Perform the monitoring required by 2a. and 2b. above as prescribed by the policies and regulations governing DERM and submit final air quality monitoring reports to FDER, DERM, and the Council staff within 60 days of the completion of the monitoring. Conduct air quality modeling of carbon monoxide impacts to determine what, if any, changes are needed in air quality monitoring, including the need to continue monitoring. The modeling shall be completed within one year after the base -line data monitoring has been completed pursuant to paragraph 2 above and the intersections have been selected pursuant to 2a. below. The air quality modeling shall follow FDER guidelines and shall: 0 98 219 a. Be limited to no more than ten (10) intersections to be selected from among the intersections projected in the DADA to operate at level of service E or F. The intersections shall be selected jointly by FDER, DERM, the Council staff, and the City. b. Be submitted in a detailed and comprehensive air quality analysis to FDER and DERM for comment and review, and to the Council staff and the City for review and approval. C. Include proposed changes to air quality monitoring as justified by the air quality modeling analysis. 4. If the results of the air quality modeling study, as described in paragraph 3 above, S. are more than 85 percent but less than 100 percent of the State standards for CO concentrations, implement an air quality monitoring and abatement program following approval of the report pursuant to 3b above. The monitoring and abatement program, including a time frame for implementation, must be approved by the Council staff and the City subsequent to review and comment by FDER and DERM. The program may include, but is not limited to, the following techniques: a. Transportation Control Measures (TCM). b. Physical planning measures (e.g. signalization, parking area locations, addition of turn lanes, etc.). C. The continuance of monitoring for specified sub -areas. If the results of the air quality modeling study, as described in Condition 3 above, exceed State standards for CO concentrations, do one of the following: a. Provide acceptable documentation which clearly indicates that CO exceedences will not occur, or that the Net New Development seeking approval will not contribute to the predicted CO violation, or that any potential CO additions for each Net New Development have been or will be mitigated (according to Council staff and the City subsequent to review and comment by FDER and DERM) prior to issuance of building permits for the particular Net New Development. Such documentation may include a 10 98- 219 6. modeling study which incorporates measures such as those contained in Condition 4a., b., and c., above. This documentation must be approved by the Council stab and the City subsequent to review and comment by FDER and DERM. b. Withhold the issuance of any building permits for Net New Development within the sub -area that shows CO exceedences. Based upon the transportation impacts generated by Total Allowable Development for Increment I, pay or contract to pay $7,543,419 (fair share in 1987 dollars), to be expended on any or all of the following transportation improvements: a. SW 2nd Avenue bridge and approaches or the Brickell Avenue bridge and approaches, b. intersection improvements to the entrance and exit ramps to I-395 at NE 1st Avenue and NE 2nd Avenue, C. other transportation improvements if mutually agreed upon by the City and Council staff, subsequent to review and comment by Dade County and the Florida Department of Transportation. The City shall pay or contract to pay the fair share within 60 days following notice that the subject improvement has been let to contract for construction. In the event the City _ contracts to pay the fair share, such contract shall in no way affect the construction schedule of the subject transportation improvement. If the improvements above have not been let to contract for construction before the earlier date of a. or b. specified below. a. ten years after the effective date of the Development Order, or b. the date of issuance of Certificates of Occupancy for more than 80 percent of the Total Allowable Development, then Council staff, the City, Dade County, and the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) will jointly decide the reallocation of $7,543,419 (fair share in 1987 dollars) within 90 days of the earlier date of either a. or b. specified above. 7. Withhold the issuance of building permits for Net New Development if the City has been determined to be in noncompliance with paragraph 6 above. 11 Y 98- 219 C(� S. Make efforts to work closely with applicable governmental agencies to ensure that the Metromover Stage II herein be completed as identified in the current Metropolitan Planning Organization's Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) published in June, 1987. In the event that by December 31, 1992, the Metromover Stage II improvements are not substantially under construction, as determined by Council staff, then this situation will be considered a substantial deviation from the mitigative efforts anticipated to offset the adverse impacts of Total Allowable Development. In this event, the Applicant shall be required to undergo additional Development of Regional Impact review for transportation impacts pursuant to F.S. 380.06(19)(a)(g) and (h), (1986). Such additional Development of Regional Impact review, if required shall be initiated by March 31, 1993. Net New Developments which have obtained building permits prior to December 31, 1992 shall not be affected by any subsequent review. 9. Within 6 months of the effective date of this Development Order, prepare and recommend to the Miami City Commission a Transportation Control Measure (TCM) Ordinance, which shall require Net New Development to do the following: a. actively encourage and promote car and van pooling by establishing or participating in a car pool information program, and b. provide mass transit route and schedule information in convenient locations throughout the individual development, and C. encourage mass transit use by the provision of bus shelters, bus turnout lanes, or other amenities to increase transit ridership. In addition, the TCM Ordinance shall include other appropriate transportation control measures to be selected from but not be limited to the list entitled "Table 4.9 - Potential Transportation Control Measures (TCM's) for Downtown Miami" on page 4-22(R) of the CADA. The TCM ordinance must be approved by Council with input from the Florida - Department of Community Affairs and the Florida Department of Transportation. 10. In the event that a Transportation Control Measures (TCM) Ordinance substantially 12 (,, 98- 219 in accord with paragraph 9 above is not adopted by the Miami City Commission within 18 months of the effective date of this Development Order, determine that this situation constitutes a substantial deviation from the mitigative efforts anticipated to offset the adverse impacts of Total Allowable Development. In this event, the Applicant shall be required to undergo additional Development of Regional Impact review pursuant to F.S. 380.06(19)(a)(g) and (h) (1986). Such additional Development of Regional Impact review, if required, shall be initiated by the Applicant within 90 days of the identification of its need. 11. Have the authority to assess development for its proportionate share of the costs of improvements and/or services necessary to monitor and/or mitigate any adverse impacts. The City shall also have authority to assess development its proportionate share of the costs attributable to preparation of the master plan, the Application for Development Approval, and this Development Order, as well as the future costs of reviewing individual development applications, monitoring compliance with this Development Order, and any other costs reasonably related to the administration and implementation of this Development Order. If necessary, the City shall establish a procedure for rebating any funds collected in excess of those funds attributable to a particular development and necessary to implement this Development Order or any ordinance or procedure required to monitor and enforce compliance with this Development Order and to mitigate the impacts of Total Allowable Development. 12. Establish December 30, 1999 as the date until which the City agrees that the grantees of building permits or Major Use Special Permits for new development, under the Downtown Miami - Increment I Development of Regional Impact shall not be subject to down -zoning, unit density reduction, or intensity reduction to the extent of the amount of development included within the building permit or Major Use Special Permit, unless the City can demonstrate that substantial changes in the conditions underlying the approval of the development order have occurred, or that the development order was based on substantially inaccurate information provided by the Applicant, or that the change is clearly essential to the public health, safety or 13 219 welfare. MONITORING, REPORTING, AND ENFORCEMENT: 13. The City shall monitor the capacity of Total Allowable Development by reserving the amount of Development Credits necessary for Net New Development at a time, to be determined by the City, prior to or coincident with approval of a building permit or Major Use Special Permit. The City shall place reasonable time limits on all building permits and Major Use Special Permits to assure that construction progresses within a reasonable period of time after approval to prevent stockpiling of reservations for Development Credits. The time period established by the City shall take into account the size of the proposed Net New Development in relationship to the time necessary to begin construction. 14. Upon the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for any Net New Development, the City shall make appropriate subtractions from the amount of Total Allowable Development under this Development Order. No Certificates of Occupancy shall be issued for Net New Development which would, in the aggregate, exceed the amount of Total Allowable Development under this Development Order. 15. The City shall integrate all original and supplemental ADA information into a Consolidated Application for Development Approval (CADA) and submit two copies of the CADA to the Council, one copy to the City Clerk, and one copy to the Florida Department of Community Affairs within thirty (30) days of the effective date of this Development Order. The CADA shall be prepared as follows: a. Where new, clarified, or revised information was prepared subsequent to submittal of the ADA but prior to issuance of this Development Order, whether in response to a formal statement of information needed or otherwise, the original pages of the ADA will be replaced with revised pages. b. Revised pages will have a "Page Number (R) - Date" notation, with "Page Number" being the number of the original page, "(R)" indicating that the page was revised, and "Date" stating the date of the revision. 14 98- 219 l(/ 16. The Consolidated Application for Development Approval is incorporated herein by reference and will be relied upon by the parties in discharging their statutory duties under F.S. 380 (1987), and local ordinances. Substantial compliance with the factual representations contained in the Consolidated Application for Development Approval is a condition for approval unless waived or modified by agreement among the Council, City, and Applicant, its successors, and/or assigns. 17. All terms, proposals, suggestions and procedures proposed in the Application for Development Approval, but not specifically incorporated in this Development Order, shall not be considered a part of the Consolidated Application for Development Approval insofar as they may have been deemed to place a requirement on the City of Miami to take any action or abstain from taking any action. The terms of this Development Order shall control and any requirements of the City are specifically enumerated herein. 18. The City shall prepare an annual report and submit copies to the Council, the City Clerk and Florida Department of Community Affairs on or before each anniversary date of this Development Order. The annual report for Downtown Miami - Increment I must also be incorporated into the annual report required in the Downtown Miami Master Development Order so that a single annual report is compiled for the entire Project. The annual report shall include, at a minimum: a. A complete response to each question in Exhibit 3. b. Identification and description of any known changes in the plan of development, or in the representations contained in the CADA, or in the phasing for the reporting year and for the next year. C. A summary comparison of Total Allowable Development and Net New Development proposed and actually approved during the year, including locations, acreage, square footage, number of units, and other units of land uses included within Total Allowable Development, and the acreage zoned and developed as City parks. d. An assessment of the Applicant's and the City's compliance with the 15 .. 9�- 219 conditions of approval contained in this Development Order and ,the commitments which are contained in the Application for Development Approval and which have been identified by the City, the Council, or the Department of Community Affairs as being significant. e. Specification of any amended DRI applications for development approval or requests for a substantial deviation determination that were filed in the reporting year or to be filed during the neat year. f. An indication of change, if any, in City Jurisdiction for any portion of the development since issuance of this Development Order. g. A statement that all persons have been sent copies of the annual report in conformance with F.S. 380.06(18)(1987). h. A copy of any recorded notice of the adoption of this Development Order or any subsequent modification that was recorded by the Applicant pursuant to F.S. 380.06(15)(1987). i. Any other information required by the Department of Community Affairs (DCA) in accordance with F.S. 380.06(18)(1987). 19. The City shall enforce the requirements of the Dade County Shoreline Development Review Ordinance (85-14) for all subsequent developments within the Shoreline Development boundary. 20. The deadline for commencing any development shall be two (2) years from the effective date of this Development Order. The termination date for completing development shall be December 30, 1999. provided that the Applicant, or its successors and assigns, complies with paragraph 25 herein. The termination date may only be modified in accordance with F.S. 380.06(19)(c 1(1987). 21. The effective date of this Development Order shall be 45 days from its transmittal to the Florida Department of Community Affairs, Council, and Applicant; provided, however, that if this Development Order is appealed, the effective date will not start until the day after all appeals have been withdrawn or resolved pursuant to F.S. M �� 88- 219 380.07(2)(1987). 22. The City shall not violate any of the conditions of this Development Order or otherwise fail to act in substantial compliance with this Development Order -or permit any property owner within the boundaries covered by this Development Order to violate any of the provisions of this Development Order. In the event any entity controlled by the Applicant and/or the City or any permittee or landowner of any Parcel of Land violates (hereinafter "violator") the provisions of this Development Order, the City shall stay the effectiveness of this Development Order as to the Parcel of Land in which the violative activity or conduct has occurred and withhold further permits, approvals, and services for development in said Parcel of Land upon passage of any appropriate resolution by the City, adopted in accordance with this section, finding that such violation has occurred. The violator will be given written notice by the City that states: 1) the nature of the purported violation, and 2) that unless the violation is cured within 30 days of said notice, the City will hold a public hearing to consider the matter within 60 days of the date of said notice. In the event the violation is not curable in 30 days, the violator's diligent good faith efforts, as determined by the City, to cure the violation within that period will obviate the need to hold a public hearing and this Development Order will remain in full force and effect unless the violator does not diligently pursue the curative action to completion within a reasonable time, in which event the City will give 15 days notice to the violator of its intention to stay the effectiveness of this Development Order and withhold further permits, approvals, and services to the Parcel of Land in which the violation has occurred and until the violation is cured. The terms of this paragraph may be modified from time to time by written agreement by the DDA, the City, and Council staff, to enable the City to enforce the terms of this Development Order to the fullest extent, while providing due process to all developers under this Development Order. 23. The Planning Director, City of Miami Planning Department, is hereby designated to monitor compliance with all conditions of this Development Order and shall have the 17 '1A 98- 219 �� duty and authority to interpret the provisions of this Development Order and to promulgate rulings, regulations and procedures necessary to implement it, provided the same are not inconsistent with the terms hereof or of F.S. 380 (1987), or duly promulgated and adopted rules thereunder. Appeals to decisions of the Planning Director may be filed pursuant to procedures set forth in Article 30 of Ordinance 9500, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended. Any noncompliance shall be subject to the provisions of paragraph 22 herein. 24. The South Florida Regional Planning Council report and recommendations, entitled "Development of Regional Impact Assessment for Downtown Miami - Increment I", dated October 5, 1987, is incorporated herein by reference. 25. Within 30 days of the effective date of this Development Order, it shall be recorded with the Clerk, Dade County Circuit Court, pursuant to F.S. 380.06(15)(1987), specifying that the Development Order runs with the land and is binding on the Applicant, its successors, and/or assigns, jointly or severally. 26. The existence of this Development Order shall not act to limit or proscribe the rights of any person under F.S. 380(1987) to file an Application for Development Approval and obtain an individual development order for property covered by this Development Order, not withstanding the existence of this Development Order. In _ the event that such an individual development order is approved and becomes effective, the individual development order shall control development of the property covered by the individual development order and the terms and conditions of this Development Order shall no longer be binding upon the property. Any such individual development orders shall, by their terms be consistent with the objectives and conditions of this Development Order. 27. This Development Order shall not repeal, nor amend in any way, any other currently effective development order or building permit within the subject area previously issued by the City Commission pursuant to F.S. 380 (1997). This Development Order shall not create nor authorize the creation or imposition of any additional requirements or restrictions, with respect to any present or future development 18 n D . . a �. ,. 9 8 219 under any currently effective Development Order or building permit issued prior hereto. Notwithstanding this paragraph, the City shall continue to have whatever authority pursuant to law it may now have or may acquire in the future (other than by virtue of this Development Order). 28. This Development Order shall not create nor impose any additional requirements or restrictions upon the City with respect to its powers to enact impact fee or assessment ordinances on development, including Net New Development under this Development Order and future development of the City, as such impact fees or assessments may be authorized by law. 29. In the event that a substantial deviation is determined under the terms of this Development Order or F.S. 380(1987), the City shall retain its ability to issue building permits and Major Use Special Permits and shall continue to do so unabated, subject to the terms and conditions of this Development Order. 30. In the event that this Development Order is subject to litigation wherein an injunction is issued staying the enforcement of this Development Order, the City shall either, under this Development Order or under the powers granted it by state law, be permitted to continue to issue building permits, Major Use Special Permits and Certificates of Occupancy until such time as a final resolution of the litigation , occurs. 31. In the event that the City enters into an interlocal agreement with Dade County to develop Bicentennial Park -and the F.E.C. Tract as a marine Facility, the City will require that, in the event marine Facility operation changes from the schedule identified in Attachment D of the Notification of a Proposed Change (dated September 7, 1994) and increased impacts to weekday p.m. peak hour traffic are projected to occur, the City will simultaneously increase Marine Facility use and decrease other approved use(s) so that the regional impacts of the land uses as changed will not exceed the adverse regional impacts of the land uses in Increment I of the Project as originally approved, as measured by total peak hour vehicle trips. The Florida Department of Community Affairs will review and approve such 19 98- 219 r7l Exhibit "B" Master Development Order INCREMENT I DEVELOPMENT ORDER NAME OF DEVELOPMENT: Downtown Miami NAME OF DEVELOPER: Downtown Development Authority of the City of Miami AUTHORIZED AGENT OF DEVELOPER: Patricia Allen, Executive Director, Downtown Development Authority and Lourdes Slazyk, Assistant Director, City of Miami Planning, Building and Zoning Department, or their successors. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The Project consists of development in Downtown Miami through the Year 2014, including the following land uses and increments: Increment I Increment II Increment III Buildout- Buildout- Buildout- Land uses Dec. 30,1999 Dec. 30. 2005 Dec. 30, 2014 Totals Office (gross square feet)- 7 3,600,000 3,700,000 6.595A06 13A95A06 Government Office (gross square feet) 300,000 250,000 200,000 750,000 Retail/Service (gross square feet) 1,050,000 400,000 500,000 1,950,000 Hotel (room) 11500 500 1,100 3,100 Residential (dwelling units) 3,550 2,550 2,920 9,020 Convention (gross square feet) 500,000 0 0 500,000 Wholesale/ Industrial (gross square feet) 11050,000 0 1,050,000 2,100,000 Institutional ( gross square feet) 300,000 0 300,000 600,000 Attract ions/Recreation ( seats) 6;W 1,600 51000 13'foo 30500 37.100 Marine Facilities 230,000 230,000 MIA95 159754.2 - OM 11 /26/97 21 j 98- 219 -73 A-1 Pm4 Au4ft4 October 1997 Prepared by: David Plummer & Associates 98- 219 -75 Maritime Park Arena Traffic Study TABLE OF CONTENTS Traffic Study ................................................ Exhibit A-1 Transportation Management Plan Outline ......................... Exhibit A-2 Development Strategies which Promote Linkages between the Project and the Downtown/Southeast Overtown Park West Community ........ Exhibit A-3 98- 219 q� i 98- 219- I Exhibit A -I Downtown DRI Maritime Park Arena Traffic Study TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................. ES-1 1.0 INTRODUCTION....................................................... I 1.1 Project Background.................................................... 1 1.2 Study Area and Methodology ............................................ 3 1.3 Study Objective....................................................... 3 2.0 EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS ........................................ 4 2.1 Data Collection ........................................................ 4 2.1.1 Roadway Characteristics ........................................... 4 2.1.2 Traffic Counts ................................................... 5 2.1.3 Intersection Data ................................................. 7 2.2 Intersection Capacity Analysis ............................................ 7 3.0 PLANNED AND PROGRAMMED ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS .............. 9 3.1 Programmed Roadway Improvements ...................................... 9 3.2 Planned Roadway Improvements ......................................... 9 4.0 FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS ........................................ 11 4.1 Committed Developments .............................................. 11 4.2 Project Traffic....................................................... 12 4.2.1 Project Trip Generation ........................................... 12 4.2.2 Project Trip Assignment .......................................... 14 4.3 Future Traffic Conditions with Project ..................................... 16 5.0 SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS ........................................... 18 5.1 Special Events Transportation Management Plan ............................. 18 5.2 Strategies promoting linkages to Downtown/Overtown Park West ............... 18 6.0 CONCLUSIONS........................................................ 19 ;. 98— 219 LIST OF EXHIBITS ExhibitI- Location Map ........................................................ 2 Exhibit 2 - Existing (1997) Traffic Volumes .......................................... 6 Exhibit 3 - Existing (1997) Intersection Lane Configuration and LOS 8 Exhibit 4 - Committed Roadway Improvements ....................................... 9 Exhibit 5 - Performing Arts Center PM Peak Hour Trip Generation ....................... 11 Exhibit 6 - Cardinal Distribution for TAZs 612 and 613................................ 12 Exhibit 7 - Future (1999) Traffic Volumes without Project ............................. 13 Exhibit 8 - Project Trip Generation ............................................... 14 Exhibit 9 - Cardinal Distribution for TAZ 615....................................... 14 Exhibit 10 - PM Peak Hour Project Trip Assignment ................................. 15 Exhibit 1 I - Future (1999) Traffic Volumes with Project and Roadway LOS ................ 17 APPENDICES Appendix A - Traffic Study Methodology Appendix B - Turning Movement Counts Appendix C - Intersection Sketches Appendix D - Intersection Capacity Analysis Worksheets �� 98- 219 EXECUTIVE SUMMA The proposed Maritime Park Arena is a major multi -use entertainment facility to be located on the "FEC" site abutting Biscayne Bay in Downtown Miami, Florida. The proposed development consists of a 24,000 seat arena, 37,500 square feet of office use and 40,000 square feet of retail use. Potentially, all of the retail will be open to the general public on a daily basis. The site will contain approximately 1,200 parking spaces in the lower levels of the Arena. Access to the project garage will be provided through Port Boulevard and the extension of NE 8 Street east of Biscayne Boulevard. The proposed arena is anticipated to begin operations for the 1999-2000 NBA Basketball season. For purposes of this study, future traffic conditions will depict 1999 conditions. In the early 1980's, the City of Miami prepared an areawide Application for Development Approval (ADA) that would give the City jurisdiction over the approval of any development within the downtown area. The document is referred as the Downtown Miami Areawide DR1. The Development Order (DO) issued allowed the City to approve both local and regional size projects. Approvals for the Maritime Park Arena are being sought under the Downtown Miami Areawide DRI. An assessment of the pm peak hour traffic associated with the Maritime Park Arena has been performed and is set forth herein. Adequate roadway capacity during the pm peak hour is available to accommodate the proposed project trips. Analysis of future (1999) traffic conditions with the project during pm peak hours shows that, except for the intersection of Biscayne Boulevard/NE 8 Street, the Downtown Miami Areawide DRI's adopted Level of Service E standard will not be exceeded. With the existing intersection configuration (unsignalized), it is anticipated that delays will be experienced for the minor street (NE 8 Street). It is recommended that the intersection of Biscayne Boulevard/NE 8 Street be signalized to improve operations for existing and future conditions. However, the approval process established by Florida's Department of Transportation for a new signal requires that the signal meet the warrants described in the Manual on Uniform Traffic Studies (MUTCD). A signal warrant study will be prepared as part of the permitting phase of the project. Maritime Parlc Arena Traffic Study ES- I t ,, 98- 219 003 In addition to the requh .,ents set forth by the Downtown Miat, Areawide DRI, a Transportation Management Plan is presented as part of the traffic study as Exhibit A-2. This is intended as an outline listing potential alternatives/strategies that may be considered in the ultimate plan in order to ensure a safe and efficient means of accommodating the traffic generated during special events. As requested by various agencies, the traffic study also contains a section on the development of strategies which promote linkages between the project and the Downtown/Southeast Overtown Park West Community (See Exhibit A-3). This section explores pedestrian linkages, as well as other modes such as transit, shuttles and water taxis. Maritime Park Arena Traffic Study ES-2 �� , . 98- 219 1.0 INTRODUCTI( 1.1 Project Background The proposed Maritime Park Arena is a major multi -use entertainment facility to be located on the "FEC" site abutting Biscayne Bay in Downtown Miami, Florida. The site, shown in Exhibit 1, is located on the northeast quadrant of Biscayne Boulevard (US 1/SR 5) and Port Boulevard (SR 886). The proposed development consists of a 24,000 seat arena, 37,500 square feet of office use (7,500 square feet for the Arena management office, and 30,000 square feet for the Miami Heat franchise and other sport related offices) and 40,000 square feet of retail use (30,000 square feet will be located outside the ticket secure area of the main arena building, and 10,000 square feet inside the arena). Potentially, all of the retail will be open to the general public on a daily basis. For purposes of this study, the retail will be treated as retail development in the downtown area (i.e. the trip generation for retail will be used). The site will contain approximately 1,200 parking spaces in the lower levels of the Arena. Access to the project garage will be provided through Port Boulevard and the extension of NE 8 Street east of Biscayne Boulevard. The proposed arena is anticipated to begin operations for the 1999-2000 NBA Basketball season. For purposes of this study, future traffic conditions will depict 1999 conditions. In the early 1980's the City of Miami prepared an areawide Application for Development Approval (ADA) that would give them jurisdiction over the approval of any development within the downtown area. The document is referred as the Downtown Miami Areawide DRI. The intent of this process was to measure the regional impacts from estimated growth in this area. The Development Order (DO) issued allowed the City to approve both local and regional size projects as long as the developer conformed with any mitigation requirements. The DO also requires the developer to use the pm peak hour volumes to establish localized impacts. The developer will be required to pay the mitigation fee for the regional impacts and to construct any close -by improvement needed to mitigate localized impacts. The proposed Maritime Park Arena project will comply with the Downtown Miami Areawide DRI process without additional mitigation measures. Maritime Park Arena Traffic Study 98- 219 �Fj EXHIBIT MARITIME PARK ARENA LOCATION MAP } P 98- gig V7 1.2 StudyArea and M, ' odology The scope and methodology for this study is based on the methodology of the previously approved Downtown Miami Arewide DRI. The methodology has been discussed with various agencies including the City of Miami, the South Florida Regional Planning Council, the Downtown Development Authority and the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT). A copy of the agreed upon methodology is presented in Appendix A. Consistent with the Downtown Miami Areawide DRI, the traffic study has been performed for pm peak hour conditions. Intersections capacity analysis has been performed for the following intersections: • Biscayne Boulevard/I-395 ramps/NE 13 Street, • Biscayne Boulevard/I-395 ramps/NE 11 Terrace, • NE 8 Street/Biscayne Boulevard, • NE 6 Street/Biscayne Boulevard, and • NE 5 Street/Biscayne Boulevard. 1.3 Study Objective Approvals for this project are sought under the development order issued to the Downtown Miami DRI. The objective of this traffic study is to assess if there are localized pm peak hour impacts in addition to those identified in the Downtown Miami DRI as a result of this project. Maritime Party Arena Traffic Study 3 '; 98- 219 2.0 EXISTING TR FIC CONDITIONS 2.1 Data Collection Data collection for this study included roadway characteristics, intersection data, vehicle classification traffic counts, pedestrian counts, signal timing, accident data, and seasonal factors. The data collection effort is described in detail in the following sections. 2.1.1 Roadway Characteristics Biscayne Boulevard south of NE 5 Street Biscayne Boulevard south of NE 5 Street is an eight lane, divided arterial roadway with sidewalks on both sides of the street. The median has surface parking areas. In some areas, it is straddled by the overhead Metromover line. Due to the widths of these median areas, the median openings are under traffic control at street intersections. Pedestrian amenities include sidewalks varying in width between 10' and 15', striped or paved pedestrian crosswalks, and pedestrian phases and buttons at all traffic lights. The posted speed limit on this facility along this area is 30 miles per hour (mph). On -street parking is only permitted in the median in this area of Biscayne Boulevard. Biscayne Boulevard between NE 5 Street and NE 13 Street Biscayne Boulevard narrows between NE 5 Street and NE 6 Street. It becomes a six lane divided facility north of NE 6 Street. The sidewalks width ranges between 6' and 12'. Portions of sidewalk on the east side of the road are missing altogether. The median becomes a raised concrete median north of NE 6 Street, and then a painted median north of NE 7 Street. On -street parking in not permitted along this section of roadway. The posted speed limit is 30 mph in this section of roadway. Biscayne Boulevard north of NE 13 Street Biscayne Boulevard becomes a four -lane facility north of NE 13 Street. The roadway becomes undivided at this point. However, a turn lane is provided in the center of the road. On -street parking continues to be prohibited. The posted speed limit is 30 mph. Maritime Park Arena Traffic Study 4 219 NE 5 Street - NE 5 Street is a 3-lane one-way eastbound roadway with a posted speed limit of 30 mph. Metromover runs parallel to NE 5 Street from NW 1 Avenue to Biscayne Boulevard. On -street parking is not permitted along NE 5 Street east of NW 1 Avenue. On -street parallel parking is permitted on both sides of the street west of NW I Avenue. NE 6 Street NE 6 Street is a 3-lane one-way westbound roadway. The posted speed limit is 30 mph. On -street parking is not permitted between Biscayne Boulevard and NE 1 Avenue. On -street parallel parking is permitted on both sides of the street west of NW 1 Avenue. Port Boulevard NE 5 Street and NE 6 Street act as a one-way pair- merging into Port Boulevard and providing direct access into the Port of Miami. Port Boulevard is a six lane divided causeway with a high span bridge, which provides access from mainland Downtown Miami to the Port of Miami (Dodge Island). The posted speed limit is 40 mph. Parking is not permitted along the road. NE 8 Street NE 8 Street is a two-way, 2-lane, undivided roadway. Parallel parking is permitted on a parking lane along both sides of the road. The posted speed limit is 30 mph. The intersection of NE 8 Street/Biscayne Boulevard is unsignalized, controlled by a stop sign. 2.1.2 Traffic Counts As agreed upon with planning staff from the City of Miami, peak hour vehicle turning movement counts were collected at the intersections under study. Seasonal adjustment factors were obtained from the FDOT. A seasonal volume adjustment factor of 1.01 (for 1996 Dade Countywide) corresponding to the date of the counts was used to adjust the raw traffic counts to a typical weekday traffic count. Appendix B provides summaries of traffic volumes and peak hour calculations for the locations counted for this study. Exhibit 2 shows the seasonally adjusted 1997 pm peak hour traffic volumes at the intersections under study. Maritime Park Arena Traffic Study 5 ........__ 98- 219 z u NI 1 PRECISE ALIGNMENT OF THE ROADWAYS - EXHIBIT 997 INTERSECTION pm MARITIME PARK ARENA TURNEXISTING ING MOVIMENT VOLUMES 2. r' 98- 21 2.1.3 Intersection Data A field survey was conducted to determine the lane configurations at the roadways and intersections - under study. Existing signal timing data was obtained from Dade County for the intersections under study. This information provided the signal phasing and timing used in the intersection capacity analysis. Exhibit 3 shows the existing lane configurations, and the resulting levels of service (LOS) for existing pm peak hour conditions. More detailed sketches of the intersections under study are provided in Appendix C. 2.2 Intersection Capacity Analysis Intersection capacity analysis was performed using the Highway Capacity Software (HCS), based on procedures of the 1994 Highway Capacity Manual. Exhibit 3 shows the resulting LOS for existing conditions at the intersections under study (see Appendix D for worksheets). The eastbound approach of the intersection of Biscayne Boulevard/NE 8 Street will experience delays with the existing lane configurations and traffic control (un-signalized). All other intersections currently operate at acceptable LOS. Maritime Park Arena Traffic Study N 98- 219 0 0 NE13ST I J95 A N.T.S. �k NE 11 TER B 0 co LEGEND 00 TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUME H 00 THROUGH LANE m OINTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE NE8ST * MARITIME PARK ARENA NE6ST o NE 5 ST NOTES: I. THIS ILLUSTRATION 15 A DIAGRAM THAT DOES NOT REFLECT THE PRECISE ALIGNMENT OF THE ROADWAYS. • DELAYS ARE EXPERIENCED BY MINOR STREET (NE 8 ST) WITH EXISTING LANE AND SIGNAL CONFIGURATION (UNSICNAUZED). BAYSI DE EXHIBIT EXISTING (1997INTERSECTION MARITIME PARK ARENA LANE LEVEL ONFIGURATION AND OF e 98- 219, q3 3.0 PLANNED ANI, PROGRAMMED ROADWAY IMPtcOVEMENTS 3.1 Programmed Roadway Improvements Dade County's 1998 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) was reviewed to determine if any roadway in the vicinity of this project are programmed for improvement. Exhibit 4 shows the programmed roadways improvements in this area. Exhibit 4 - Committed Roadway Improvements F— Roadway Improvement Timing and Type of Work Port Boulevard ITS Information System 1997/1998 Design Biscayne Blvd To Dodge Island 1997/1998 Construction I-395/SR 836/I-95 Corridor Improvement 2000/2001 Design NW 17 Av to McArthur Cswy. 3.2 Planned Roadway Improvements Planned (unfunded) improvements in the area include the widening of Biscayne Boulevard north of NE 5 Street. This improvement will include widening of the sidewalks and median as well as beautification of the sidewalks. At this time, this is a conceptual improvement; plans have not been completed. The Downtown Development Authority (DDA) has been considering the creation of a Downtown Circulation Loop (DCL). The objective is to improve traffic flow in the downtown area by diverting traffic to an arterial loop; this will ensure that any downtown area origin or destination is within a few blocks of an arterial. The DCL would serve as a system that provides improved access between I-95 and the downtown land uses. It will also allow vehicles to circulate around downtown while avoiding streets which have high pedestrian usage. Different alternatives have been studied in the past. However, there is no definite plan for the ultimate DCL. Maritime Park Arena Traffic Study 9 98- 219 The Florida Department u. fransportation (FDOT) has been studying improvements to I-395. However, in order to accommodate the proposed Maritime Park Arena and Performing Arts Center, FDOT has - suspended completion of the preliminary engineering of the improvements to I-395. They will reactivate those studies, and will adjust them for the revised traffic demands, including special event requirements, as soon as both projects are defined. Completion of the construction of the I-395 improvements will occur after completion of the Arena. For purposes of this study, these improvements have not been accounted for. Maritime Park Arena Traffic Study E 88- 219Q6 4.0 FUTURE TRAIN r IC CONDITIONS 4.1 Committed Developments It was agreed upon with the reviewing agencies that traffic generated by the proposed Performing Arts Center should be considered in this study. This complex will consist of a 2,400 seat Ballet/Opera House, a 2,200 seat Concert Hall and a 450 seat Studio Theater. It will be located east and west of Biscayne Boulevard between NE 13 Street and NE 14 Street. Investigation of committed developments, verified with City of Miami staff, did not reveal imminent developments in the area. A 2% growth factor was added to existing traffic volumes to account for any development that may occur within the study period. Trip generation for the Performing Arts Center was estimated using the table titled Land Use Exchange Rates for Downtown Miami DRI. This table was obtained in Attachment D-2: Downtown Miami DRI Facilities Trip Generation. Analysis in the Notification of Proposed Change (NOPC) to the Downtown Miami DRI, submitted to the South Florida Regional Planning Council in September, 1994. This table showing the rates used for purposes of this study is provided in Appendix E. It is widely recognized that these rates are "Urban Environment Trip Generation Rates" reflecting conditions during the pm peak hour of the roadway system in Downtown Miami (afternoon "rush hour"). These rates are not intended to reflect traffic generation during a special event, but rather during the worst time of a typical weekday. During those times the Performing Arts Center traffic generation is primarily administrative and maintenance personnel only. Exhibit 5 shows pm peak hour trip generation for this project, along with the proposed land uses. Exhibit 5 - Performing Arts Center PM Peak Hour Trip Generation Project Name & Address Land Use Designation Number of Units PM Peak Hour Vehicle Tri s Performing Arts Center Attraction/ 5,050 Seats 10 Biscayne Blvd/NE 13 St Recreation Maritime Park Arena Traffic Study Q� - 98- 219 l Traffic generated by this u ,,telopment was distributed and assigned to the study area using the Cardinal Distribution for Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZ) 612 and 613, shown in Exhibit 6. The Cardinal - Distribution gives a generalized distribution of trips from a TAZ to other parts of Dade County. For estimating trip distribution for the committed project, consideration was given to conditions such as the roadway network accessed by the project, roadways available to travel in the desired direction, and attractiveness of traveling on a specific roadway. Exhibit 6 - Cardinal Distribution (TAZs 612 & 613) Cardinal Direction Distribution (TAZ 612) Distribution (TAZ 613) NNE 12.39% 10.84% ENE 4.42% 3.88% ESE 4.84% 4.10% SSE 6.92% 1.38% SSW 16.45% 17.35% WSW 20.10% 24.48% WNW 16.40% 16.48% NNW 18.48% 21.4 %a Total 100% 100% Future traffic volumes prior to the proposed Maritime Park Arena were projected for the buildout year 1999-2000. Future (1999) turning movement volumes without the project projected for the intersections under study are shown in Exhibit 7. 4.2 Project Traffic 4.2.1 Project Trip Generation Trip generation for the project was estimated using the rates published in Attachment D-2: Downtown Miami DRI Facilities Trip Generation Analysis if the Notification of Proposed Change (NOPC) to the Downtown Miami DRI, submitted to the South Florida Regional Planning Council in September, 1994. This table showing the rates used for purposes of this study, is provided in Appendix E. It is widely recognized that these rates are "Urban Environment Trip Generation Rates" reflecting conditions during the pm peak hour of the roadway system in Downtown Miami (afternoon "rush hour"). The rates are not intended to reflect traffic generation during a special event, but rather during the worst time of a Maritime Park Arena Traffic Study 12 ss- 219 q? NE13ST L--120 F. -175 I I i-388 �I CV -O 0 C NE 11 TER 656 -! } 57 A N.T.S. m LEGEND W L-00 }Z- TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUME -00 THROUGH MOVEMENT VOLUME m v M INN NE8Sf .1 43-! } 12-i 01 -0 M CN MARITIME PARK ARENA -- 440 r--152 NE6Si r NE 5 ST POR7 230-- ' } r 98 - co NOTES: BAYSI DE I. THIS ILLUSTRATION IS A DIAGRAM THAT DOES NOT REFLECT THE PRECISE ALIGNMENT OF THE ROADWAYS. 0 0 a MARITIME PARK ARENA P I EXHIBIT FUTURE (1999) TRAFFIC _7 CONDITIONS WITHOUT PROJECT 13 98- 219 qq typical weekday. During thc,._ cimes the proposed Arena's traffic gent—t(ion is primarily administrative and maintenance personnel only. Trip generation for the project is shown in Exhibit 8. Exhibit 8 - Maritime Park Arena Trip Generation (PM Peak Hour) Maritime Park Arena Land Use Designation Number of Units PM Peak Hour Vehicle Trips Attraction/Recreation 24,000 Seats 49 Office 37.500 Square Feet 22 Retail 40,000 Square Feet 21 TOTAL 92 4.2.2 Project Trip Assignment Project traffic was distributed and assigned to the study area using the Cardinal Distribution for TAZ 615 shown in Exhibit 9. The Cardinal Distribution gives a generalized distribution of trips from a TAZ to other parts of Dade County. For estimating trip distribution for the project location, consideration was given to conditions such as the roadway network accessed by the project, roadways available to travel in the desired direction, and attractiveness of traveling on a specific roadway. Exhibit 10 shows the - project trip assignment to the impacted roadway segments and intersections. Exhibit 9 - Cardinal Distribution (TAZ 615) Cardinal Direction Distribution NNE 12.97% ENE 3.24% ESE 1.62% SSE 0.54% SSW 19.46% WSW 28.65% WNW 8.65% NNW 24.86% Total 100 % Maritime Park Arena Traffic Study 14 ()C), " , . 1- 98- 219 = o 0 1 NE13ST rf �o 1.395 NE 0 TER 7 CV LEGEND uj L-00 TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUME 00 THROUGH TURNING MOVEMENT m 29 cv ; L !� 2 NE 8 ST r� CV MARITIME PARK ARENA �-- 3 — M 90 NE b ST 2 o4 L PORT" NE 5 ST 1 �� tr 9� v— NOTES: BAYSI DE I. THIS ILLUSTRATION IS A DIAGRAM THAT DOES NOT REFLECT THE PRECISE ALIGNMENT OF THE ROADWAYS, EXHIBIT MARITIME PARK ARENA PROTECT TRAFFIC 10 15 ,..:.98- 219� �� 4.3 Future Traffic Cot. _ions with Project Using the trip assignments from the previous sections, the project trips, background growth and committed development trips were combined with the adjusted 1997 existing traffic to get the total 1999 traffic on the impacted roadway segments. Exhibit 11 shows the total pm peak hour turning movement volumes, along with the resulting roadway LOS with the project, at all the intersections under study. Intersection capacity analysis worksheets are provided in Appendix C. It is anticipated that with the existing intersection configuration (unsignalized), delays will be experienced by traffic to and from NE 8 Street at the intersection of Biscayne Boulevard/NE 8 Street. It is recommended that this intersection be signalized in order to improve operations for existing as well as future conditions. Signalization of this intersection will not only improve pm peak hour level of service, but will also facilitate traffic control during higher volume conditions, such as special events. However, the approval process established by Florida's Department of Transportation for a new signal requires that the signal meet the warrants described in the Manual on Uniform Traffic Studies (MUTCD). A signal warrant study will be prepared as part of the permitting phase of the project. Intersection capacity analysis for these intersections was performed with the recommended signal in place (worksheets are also provided in Appendix Q. The analysis shows the intersection operating at LOS A with this improvement. All other intersections are projected to operated within the LOS E standard established in the Downtown Miami Areawide DRI. Maritime Park Arena Traffic Study 16 �� 98- 219 NE13ST NE8ST NE6ST NE5ST {--120 a-175 F-391 N.T.S. 8 Q fV coz NEATER 656 —! 64 —1 c c 0 m LEGEND } L-00 TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUME —00 THROUGH MOVEMENT VOLUME CID o OA INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE r S�l M 29 J L 2 A� 43—J -� � r OP co fN 12—� N MARITIME PARK AREN o -F--460 t— 161 1 B u. fV Q ^-- P CV .o o- B t r 231 107— r+o, NOTES: Illy `� BAYSIDE of I. THIS ILLUSTRATION 15 A DIAGRAM THAT DOES NOT REFLECT THE I I PRECISE ALIGNMENT OF THE ROADWAYS. WITH RECOMENDED SICNALIZATION EXHIBIT MARITIME PARK ARENA FUTURE (i999� TRAFFIC 1� CONDITIONS WITH PROJECT P x 5.0 SPECIAL CONsa)ERATIONS 5.1 Special Events Transportation Management Plan Because of the nature of this project, it is anticipated that large traffic volumes will be generated during special events, while modest demands will be the norm during other hours of operation. Generally, special events occur during off-peak hours. This is an ideal situation because there is excess roadway capacity available during off-peak hours. However, it is also recognized that a Special Events Transportation Management Plan needs to be developed to ensure a safe and efficient means of accommodating the traffic generated during special events. Although this plan needs to be studied and developed in more detail, an outline has been provided as part of this submittal as Exhibit A-2. This outline lists potential alternatives/strategies that may be considered in the Special Events Transportation Management Plan. 5.2 Strategies promoting linkages to Downtown/Overtown Park West Since parking will be limited at the proposed site, pedestrian access will be critical to the success of the proposed Maritime Park Arena Therefore, project design will emphasize the importance of other modes of transportation. A discussion of possible strategies that can be implemented as part of this project, with the support of the appropriate responsible agencies, is presented in Exhibit A-3 of the traffic study. Maritime ParkArcna Traffic Study 18 j� 98- 219 6.0 CONCLUSIONS An assessment of the pm peak hour traffic associated with the Maritime Park Arena was performed in accordance with the requirements of the Downtown Miami Areawide DRI. If warranted, it is recommended that the intersection of Biscayne Boulevard/NE 8 Street be signalized in order to improve operations for existing as well as future conditions. Analysis of future (1999) traffic conditions with the project during pm peak hours shows that the Downtown Miami Areawide DRI's adopted Level of Service E standard will not be exceeded. Adequate roadway capacity during the pm peak hour is available to accommodate the proposed project trips. The proposed Maritime Park Arena Project will comply with the requirements of the Downtown Miami Areawide DRI without additional regional mitigation measures. Maritime Park Arena Traffic Study _ 19 98- 219/0s APPENDIX A Traffic Impact Study Methodology d� 9 8 TRAFFIC APPROVAL PROCESS MARITIME PARK ARENA (Revised September 3. 1997) Downtown DRI Conditions The Maritime Park Arena is a mixed use project. The Arena will have 24,000 event seats. The same site will have a limited amount of land uses that complement the Arena events but will also be open to the general public. Examples include restaurants, retail, and a Miami Heat theme store. In the early 1980's the City of Miami prepared an area wide Application for Development Approval (ADA) for Developments of Regional Impacts. There were two separate ADA's. The first area is Southeast Overtown/Parkwest. The second was the retail and office center of the City including the areas along Brickell Avenue south of the Miami River and Omni (north of the CBD). Both documents are usually referred to as the Downtown DRI. The intent of the Downtown DRI was to measure the regional impacts from estimated growth in - these areas. The Downtown Development Order identified the degree of required transportation improvements to support this growth. The Order then allowed the City to approve both local and regional size projects as long as the developer conformed with the mitigation requirements. The South Florida Regional Planning Council, and the other review agencies, selected the two-way P.M. peak hour as the analysis hour for the DRI. The two way volumes were estimated for the growth and the transportation mitigation to support that growth was set. The City is allowed to permit projects within the DRI area until the level, or threshold, of these estimated peak hour volumes is exceeded. At that time another increment of the Downtown DRI would be completed that establishes new mitigation requirements and new volume thresholds. A-1 <_ k 98_ 2f# /07 The Development Order also requires the developer to use the P.M. peak hour volumes to establish close -by improvements to support their site. The developer will be required to both pay the mitigation rate for the regional impacts and to construct the close -by intersection improvements. The Maritime Park Arena will comply with the Downtown DRI process. The P.M. peak hour trips generated by the land uses at the Arena will be estimated and compared to the regional trip allowance in Downtown Miami. Comparisons will be made to the original mix of DRI land uses and simultaneous increases and decreases will be made to the land use list. The nearby intersections will be analyzed in the P.M. peak hour and commitments made to the signalization and turn lane construction that may be required to support these volumes. Arena Process The legal requirements for development of the Arena are satisfied with the completion of the studies noted above. However, the State of Florida, South Florida Regional Planning Council, and the developers recognize that the Arena attracts significant patrons outside of the rush or peak hours. It makes --no economical sense, or urban design principals, to construct large transportation improvements to support those limited amounts of off-peak operations. It would be far better to develop a Transportation/Traffic Management master plan to make better utilization of the existing system during those hours. Examples of the elements in this plan would include reversing streets, imbalanced lanes, police control of traffic, satellite parking, and promotion of transit. The Arena, as part of the traffic approval process, proposes the three step technical process described above. The first two steps meet the requirements of the Downtown Development Order. The third item creates comfortable and efficient circulation for the off-peak hour Arena events. PM Peak Hour Trip -Generation and Simultaneous Increase/Decrease of Land Uses Adjacent Intersection Level of Service Analysis and Mitigation (PM peak hour) Transportation/Traffic Management Plan A-2 r 98- 219 TASK I - SIMULTANEOUS INCREASEMECREASE IN LAND USES The PM peak hour trips generated by all the land uses in the site will be estimated using the trip generation rates established in the original ADA. It is expected that the retail type uses at the site will be the dominant contributors to the PM peak hour volumes. The Arena contribution during those weekday PM hours will be employees, deliveries, and other limited uses. The two way PM peak hour volumes will then be deducted from the DRI threshold. There will also be simultaneous increases and decreases in the land use list that was part of the original Development Order. TASK 2 - NEARBY INTERSECTION ANALYSIS The PM peak hour -capacity analysis at the major intersections and nearby driveways will be completed. For the Arena it will involve the intersections listed below. The analysis will begin with existing PM peak hour volumes, will add other committed projects, then superimpose the Arena volumes on those totals to determine the future level of service at the location. All generation rates will be consistent with the Downtown DRI approvals. The PM peak hour trips generated by the proposed Performing Arts Center will be considered committed traffic. The analysis will identify any intersection mitigation that may be required to maintain acceptable levels of service. Likely examples would include turn lanes and signalization timing. Analysis Intersection Biscayne Boulevard/Interstate 395 NE 8th Street / Biscayne Boulevard NE 6th Street / Biscayne Boulevard NE 5th Street / Biscayne Boulevard A-3 98- 218 �� TASK 3 - TRANSPORTATION/ TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PLAN The Transportation Management Plan, which will include the special event traffic operations plan, will be put in place to accommodate the Arena volumes during the off-peak hours. The Plan recognizes that the Arena traffic can be absorbed on the site street system if supported by special operational plans during those hours. The Plan also recognizes the importance of car pooling, available transit, directional signing and the like. Plan Elements 1) Revised geometrics to allow double, with police control, rather than single turn lanes. 2) Reversing lanes to accommodate inbound and then outbound movements. 3) Imbalanced lanes. 4) Police.control of signal timing. 5) Expressway directional signs encouraging use of a variety of expressway exits. 6) Internet web sites showing routes and available parking. 7) .Car pooling. 8) Promoting multiple stops and using charter buses from restaurants and entertainment spots. The Management Plan will be submitted to the City of Miami. It is possible there will be several different plans depending on the level of event patronage. The Miami Heat sellout, for instance, will have a more comprehensive plan than an event not expected to fill the Arena. The Plan, including the special event traffic operations, become a commitment that would be part of the Arena approval. I-395 The Florida Department of Transportation, in order to accommodate the future plans of the Arena and Performing Arts Center, has suspended completion of the preliminary engineering of the improvements of I-395. They will reactivate those studies, adjusting for the revised traffic demands including special event requirements, as soon as those projects are defined. Completion of the construction of the I-395 improvements will occur after the completion of the Arena. For this reason the Tasks 2 and 3 described above may have to be completed for the existing I-395 conditions, then adjusted for the proposed improvements on that same facility. 971 17/dsp/mart t-pk.rep A-4 .r a:, 98- 219 APPENDIX B Turning Movement Counts o � 98- 2191'� SUMMARY OF PM PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS DPA 94W Cq 2.- LOCATION: Biscayne Boulevard/NE 5 Street CITY: Miami COUNTY: Dade DATE: 9/10/97 OBSERVER: DPA REMARKS: TIME TO NORTHBOUND �EASlfBOUND WESTBOUND GRANDFROM L T R Total L5SOUTHBOUND T R Total L R Total L T R Total TOTAL 04:00 PM 04:15 PM - 301 9 310 38 242 - 280 46 35 27 108 - 04:15 PM 04:30 PM - 289 9 298 34 226 - 260 50 38 26 114 - - - 698 04:30 PM 04:45 PM - 343 19 362 27 228 - 255 54 18 28 100 - - - - 672 04:45 PM 05:00 PM - 314 17 331 31 223 - 254 42 22 28 92 - - 717 05:00 PM 05:15 PM - 409 10 4.19 39 239 - 278 57 24 20 101 - - - - 677 05:15 PM 05:30 PM - 438 7 445 38 252 - 290 50 23 39 112 - - - 798 05:30 PM 05:45 PM - 386 13 399 31 258 - 289 56 16 28 100 - - - 847 05:45 PM 06:00 PM - 393 16 409 40 215 - 255 56 30 19 105 - - - - 788 88 - - - 769 PM PEAK HOUR CALCULATIONS Seasonally Adjusted PM Peak Hour Volumes TIME NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND GRAND FROM TO L T R Total L I T R Total L T R Total L T R Total TOTAL 05:00 PM 06:00 PM 0 1642 46 1689 149 974 - 1123 221 94 107 422 - - - - 3234 PEAK HOUR FACTOR 0.94 0.96 0.93 NA 0.95 [�4I> A seasonal adjustment factor of 1.01 was used. 09/23/97 BISNE5ST.WK4 W N SUMMARY OF PM PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS N"01 DPA 971 tpq 90 LOCATION: Biscayne Boulevard/NE 6 Street CITY: Miami COUNTY: Dade DATE: 9/10/97 OBSERVER:DPA REMARKS: TIME NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND GRAND FROM TO L I T R Total L T R Total L T R Total I L J T IR Total TOTAL 04:00 PM 04:15 PM 15 346 - 361 - 258 6 264 - - - 0 38 90 85 213 838 04:15 PM 04:30 PM 21 323 - 344 - 218 10 228 - - - 0 28 95 86 209 781 04:30 PM 04:45 PM 16 382 - 398 - 228 11 239 - - - 0 22 85 89 196 833 04:45 PM 05:00 PM 18 344 - 362 - 245 12 257 - - - 0 20 115 99 234 853 05:00 PM 05:15 PM 22 447 - 469 - 250 9 259 - - - 0 34 158 111 303 1031 05:15 PM 05:30 PM 20 481 - 501 - 256 12 268 - - - 0 40 81 75 196 965 05:30 PM 05:45 PM 10 430 - 440 - 268 8 276 - - - 0 32 89 108 229 945 05:45 PM 06:00 PM 13 441 - 454 - 221 12 233 - - - 0 39 91 82 212 899 PM PEAK HOUR CALCULATIONS Seasonally Adjusted PM Peak Hour Volumes TIME NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND GRAND FROM TO L T R Total L I T R Total L T R Total L T R Total TOTAL 05.00 PM 1 06:00 PM 66 1817 - 1883 - 1005 1 41 1046 - - - 0 146 423 380 949 3878 PEAK HOUR FACTOR 0.93 0.94 NA 0.78 0.93 NOTES: A seasonal adjustment factor of 1.01 was used. 09124197 BISNE6ST.wK4 w SUMMARY OF PM PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS DPA VR7 Ice LOCATION: Biscayne Boulevard/NE 8 Street CITY: Miami COUNTY: Dade DATE: 9/11/97 OBSERVER: DPA REMARKS: TIME___f _ NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND GRAND FROM TO L T R Total L T R Total L T R Total L T Total TOTAL 04:00 PM I 04:15 PM 16 427 - 443 - 232 9 241 10 - 5 15 - - - - 699 04:15 PM 04:30 PM 13 442 - 455 - 235 8 243 16 - 3 19 - - - 717 04:30 PM I 04:45 PM 14 471 - 485 - 267 7 274 10 - 3 13 - - - - 772 04:45 PM 05:00 PM 15 473 - 488 - 276 12 288 2 - 4 6 - - - - 782 05:00 PM 05:15 PM 17 567 - 584 - 344 16 360 11 - 0 11 - - - - 955 05:15 PM 05:30 PM 19 555 - 574 - 278 13 291 12 - 4 16 - - - - i 881 05:30 PM 05:45 PM 14 558 - 572 - 291 5 296 7 - 1 8 - - - - 876 05:45 PM 06:00 PM 15 542 - 557 - 231 7 238 11 - 6 17 - - - - 812 PM PEAK HOUR CALCULATIONS Seasonally Adjusted PM Peak Hour Volumes TIME NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND IEASTBOUND WESTBOUND IGRAND FROM TO L I T R Total L T R Total L T I R I Total L I T R Total TOTAL 05:00 PM 06:00 PM 66 2244 - 2310 - 1155 41 1197 41 - 11 53 - - - - 3559 PEAK HOUR FACTOR 0.98 0.82 0.76 NA I 0.92 A seasonal adjustment factor of 1.01 was used. 09/23/97 13ISNHST.wK4 I � DPA 97117 SUMMARY OF PM PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS LOCATION: Biscayne Boulevard/1.395/NE 13 Terrace CITY: Miami COUNTY: Dade DATE: 9/16/97 OBSERVER:DPA REMARKS: TIME NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND GRAND FROM TO L I T R Total L T R Total L T R Total L L I T I R I Total TOTAL 04:00 PM 04:15 PM 18 281 - 299 - 235 16 251 - - - 0 78 36 31 145 695 04:15 PM 04:30 PM 11 265 - 276 - 185 11 196 - - - 0 65 21 30 116 588 04:30 PM 04:45 PM 13 291 - 304 - 163 14 177 - - - 0 69 45 41 155 636 04:45 PM 05:00 PM 16 298 - 314 - 202 13 215 - - - 0 98 38 41 177 706 05:00 PM 05:15 PM 15 337 - 352 - 236 16 252 - - - 0 92 58 26 176 780 05:15 PM 05:30 PM 13 354 - 367 - 219 16 235 - - - 0 92 39 18 149 751 05:30 PM 05:45 PM 18 345 - 363 - 214 19 233 - - - 0 87 31 29 147 743 05:45 PM 06:00 PM 8 344 - 352 - 182 18 200 - - - 0 65 44 37 146 698 PM PEAK HOUR CALCULATIONS Seasonally Adjusted PM Peak Hour Volumes TIME NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND GRAND FROM TO L T R Total L T R 11otal L T R Total _ L T R Total TOTAL . 04:45 PM 05:45 PM 63 1347 - 1410 . - 880 65 944 - - - 0 373 168 115 655 3010 PEAK HOUR FACTOR 0.95 0.93 NA 0.92 0.96 NOTES: A seasonal adjustment factor of 1.01 was used. 09/23/97 81SC 13. WKI APPENDIX C Intersection Schematics p dpa -:�.-j 291r9 0 ' � v +� �I VIJV\I IBC OIYV ARE PORT BLVD N.T.S. N.T.S. m 4 d N 5 ST ^" y� PARKING �\ ?, LOT m NE 5 ST AT BISCAYNE BLVD 6 EXHIBIT P MARITIME PARK ARENA EXISTING PROTECT INST1 RSECnONS SCHEMATIC DIACRAMS Cli 9 8 - 219 J BISCAYNE BLVD AT NE II ST a m W Z 8 m NEB J MARITIME PARK ARENA 4141414 N 444 III III bIbI4IL NE 8 ST AT BISCAYNE BLVD EXISTING PROJECT INSTERSECTIONS SCHEMATIC DIAGRAMS N. T. S. N.T.S. _EXHIBIT C.2 98- 219 !a1 4 4 N.T.S. NE 13 Sr a G5 m U m BISCAYNE BLVD AT NE U ST _EXHIBIT P MARITIME PARK ARENA EXISTING PROTECT INSTERSECTIONS 3 I SCHEMATIC DIAGRAMS C'3 8.8- 219 /oq5 APPENDIX D Intersection Capacity Analysis OO 9$- 219 tpq HCM: SIGNALIZED INl SECTION SUMMARY Version .4d 09-22-1997 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation Streets: (E-W) N.E. 5 Street (N-S) Biscayne Boulevard Analyst: DPA File Name: BISSSTE.HC9 Area Type: Other 9-17-97 PM PK H Comment: EXISTING (1997) TRAFFIC CONDITIONS (EASTMOST APPROACH) Eastbound ------------------------------------ Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R ---- ---- ---- L T R ---- ---- L T R L T R No. Lanes 1> 3 ---- ---- ---- ---- 4< ---- ---- ---- 2 4 Volumes 221 94 1642 46 149 974 Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vols 60 15 15 Lost Time ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left * NB Left Thru * Thru Right Right Peds Peds WB Left SB Left Thru Thru Right Right Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WE Right Green 30.OA Green 42.OP 16.OA Yellow/AR 4.0 Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0 Cycle Length: 100 secs Phase combination order: #1 #5 #6 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow ----- ---- Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS ------- EB L 414 1336 ----- ----- ----- --- ----- --- 0.198 0.310 19.3 C 19.2 C LT 1472 4750 0.187 0.310 19.2 C NB TR 2948 6856 0.657 0.430 15.1 C 15.1 C SB L 558 3282 0.290 0.170 27.6 D 6.2 B T 4331 6875 0.260 0.630 3.1 A Intersection Delay = 12.3 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B Lost Time/Cycle, L = 9.0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.432 D-1 f?q .. 98 219 /0 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Versior 1.4d 09-24-1997 - Cente 'or Microcomputers In Tra. )ortation Streets: (E-W) N.E. 5 Street (N-S) Biscayne Boulevard Analyst: DPA File Name: BIS5STEF.HC9 Area Type: Other 9-17-97 PM PK H Comment: FUTURE 1999 TRAFFIC CONDITIONS WITH PROJECT (EASTMOST APPROACH) Eastbound Westbound ------------------------------ Northbound Southbound L T R ---- ---- ---- L ---- T R ---- ---- L T R L T R No. Lanes 1> 3 ---- ---- ---- 4< ---- ---- ---- 2 4 Volumes 231 107 1712 49 157 1025 Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vols 60 15 15 Lost Time ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left * NB Left Thru * Thru Right Right Peds Peds WB Left SB Left Thru Thru Right Right Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 30.OA Green 42.OP 16.OA Yellow/AR 4.0 Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0 Cycle Length: 100 secs Phase combination order: #1 #5 #6 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS ----- ----------- EB L 414 1336 ----- ----- ----- --- ----- --- 0.205 0.310 19.3 C 19.3 C LT 1472 4750 0.202 0.310 19.3 C NB TR 2947 6854 0.686 0.430 15.4 C 15.4 C SB L 558 3282 0.305 0.170 27.7 D 6.2 B T 4331 6875 0.274 0.630 3.1 A Intersection Delay = 12.5 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B Lost Time/Cycle, L = 9.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.451 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- �l1 0-2 98- 219 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTIRSECTION SUMMARY Version 1.4d 09-22-1997 ` Cente_ or Microcomputers In Trai ortation ---- ------------------------- -------- Streets: (E-W) N.E. 5 Street (N-S) Biscayne Boulevard Analyst: DPA File Name: BIS5ST.HC9 Area Type: Other 9-17-97 PM PK H Comment: EXISTING (1997) TRAFFIC CONDITIONS (WESTMOST APPROACH) Eastbound Westbound ------------------------- Northbound Southbound L T R ---- ---- ---- L T R ---- ---- ---- L T R ---- L T R No. Lanes 3 1 ---- ---- 4< ---- ---- ---- 2 4 Volumes 315 107 1642 46 149 974 Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vols 60 15 15 Lost Time ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left NB Left Thru * Thru Right * Right Peds Peds WB Left SB Left Thru Thru Right Right Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 30.OA Green 42.OP 16.OA Yellow/AR 4.0 Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0 Cycle Length: 100 secs Phase combination order: #1 #5 #6 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS ----- ----------- EB T 1472 4750 ----- ----- ----- --- ----- --- 0.248 0.310 19.6 C 19.5 C R 417 1346 0.120 0.310 18.8 C NB TR 2948 6856 0.657 0..430 15.1 C 15.1 C SB L 558 3282 0.290 0.170 27.6 D 6.2 B T 4331 6875 0.260 0.630 3.1 A Intersection Delay = 12.4 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B Lost Time/Cycle, L = 9.0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.449 D-3 98- 219 /3/ HCM: SIGNALIZED INTs'RSECTION SUMMARY Versior-1.4d 09-24-1997 Cente. 'or Microcomputers In Trai_ .-ortation Streets: (E-W) N.E. 5 Street (N-S) Biscayne Boulevard Analyst: DPA File Name: BISSSTF.HC9 Area Type: Other 9-17-97 PM PK H Comment: FUTURE 1999 TRAFFIC CONDITIONS W PROJECT (WESTMOST APPROACH) Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes ---- ---- ---- 3 1 ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- 4 < ---- ---- ---- .2 4 Volumes 338 111 1712 49 157 1025 Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vols 60 15 15 Lost Time 3.00 3.001 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left NB Left Thru * Thru Right * Right Peds Peds WB Left SB Left Thru Thru Right Right Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 30.OA Green 42.OP 16.OA Yellow/AR 4.0 Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0 Cycle Length: 100 secs Phase combination order: #1 #5 #6 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS ----- --- ----- --- ----- ----------- EB T 1472 4750 ----- ----- 0.266 0.310 19.7 C 19.6 C R 417 1346 0.129 0.310 18.9 C NB TR 2947 6854 0.686 0.430 15.4 C 15.4 C SB L 558 3282 0.305 0.170 27.7 D 6.2 B T 4331 6875 0.274 0.630 3.1 A Intersection Delay = 12.7 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B Lost Time/Cycle, L = 9.0 sec ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Critical v/c(x) = 0.472 D-4 98- 219 HCM: SIGNALIZED IN ZSECTION SUMMARY Versiol .4d 09-23-1997 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation Streets: (E-W) N.E. 6 Street N-S Biscayne Boulevard Analyst: DPA File Name: BIS6ST.HC9 Area Type: Other 9-17-97 PM-PK H Comment: EXISTING (1997) TRAFFIC CONDITIONS ------------------------------ Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- No. Lanes 1 3< 2 4 6< Volumes 146 423 380 66 1817 1005 41 Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vols 10 0 15 Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left NB Left Thru Thru Right Right Peds Peds WB Left * SB Left Thru * Thru Right * Right Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 40.OA Green 38.OP S.OA Yellow/AR 7.0 Yellow/AR 5.0 5.0 Cycle Length: 100 secs Phase combination order: #1 #5 #6 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS ----- ----------- ----- ----- ----- --- ----- --- WB L 640 1455' 0.241 0.440 13.4 B 14.4 B TR 2287 5197 0.401 0.440 14.5 B NB L 248 3539 0.287 0.070 33.7 D 11.1 B T 3707 7414 0.568 0.500 10.3 B SB TR 4439 11098 0.269 0.400 13.7 B 13.7 B Intersection Delay = 12.6 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B Lost Time/Cycle, L = 6.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.490 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- D-5 ,:, 98- 219 1�3 6M HCM: SIGNALIZED IN'---7RSECTION SUMMARY Versior 1.4d 09-24-1997 Cente ?or Microcomputers In Tra. dortation Streets (E-W) N E 6 Street (N-S) Biscayne Boulevard Analyst: DPA File Name: BIS6STF.HC9 Area Type: Other 9-17-97 PM PK H Comment: FUTURE 1999 TRAFFIC CONDITIONS W PROJECT -------------------------------- Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- No. Lanes 1. 3 < 2 4 6 < Volumes 161 460 398 69 1892 1051 44 Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vols 10 0 15 Lost Time 1 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left NB Left Thru Thru Right Right Peds Peds WB Left * SB Le f t Thru * Thru Right * Right Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 40.OA Green 38.OP 5.OA Yellow/AR 7.0 Yellow/AR 5.0 5.0 Cycle Length: 100 secs Phase combination order: #1 #5 #6 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS ----- ----------- ----- ----- ----- --- ----- --- WB L 640 1455 0.264 0.440 13.5 B 14.6 B TR 2290 5205 0.428 0.440 14.7 B NB L 248 3539 0.303 0.070 33.7 D 11.3 B T 3707 7414 0.591 0.500 10.5 B SB TR 4438 11095 0.282 0.400 13.8 B 13.8 B Intersection Delay = 12.8 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B Lost Time/Cycle, L = 6.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.515 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- [al 98- 219 HCS: Unsignalized tersections Release 2.1 BISBST.HCO Page 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 --------------------------- Streets: (N-S) Biscayne Boulevard (E-W) NE 8 Street Major Street Direction.... NS Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) Analyst. ... ........... DPA Date of Analysis.......... 9/18/97 Other Information ......... Existing (1997) Traffic Conditions Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound L T R • L T R L T R L T R ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- No. Lanes Stop/Yield Volumes PHF Grade MC' s M ) SU/RV's (k) Cv's (�) PCE I s ------------ 0 -> 4 0 N 66 2244 .95 .95 0 1.10 --------------- 0 4 < 0 N 1155 41 .95 .95 0 ---------------- 0 > 1 < 0 41 0 11 .95 .95 .95 0 1.10 1.10 1.101 ---------------- Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) ------------------------------------------------------------------ Left Turn Major Road 5.50 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.50 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 7.00 3.40 D-7 r :: 9 8 - 219 �5 HCS: UnsiInalized .ersections Release 2.1c BIS8ST.HCO Page 2 =cxco====xxaoxxcx=ao..nxxx==ce=x=x=axxxsaaasaxx=oc========o=c=====aa___ Worksheet for TWSC Intersection -------------------------------------------------------- Step 1: RT from Minor Street WB -------------------------------------------------------- EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 326 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 947 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 947 Prob. of Queue -Free State: -------------------------------------------------------- 0.99 Step 2: LT from Major Street SB -------------------------------------------------------- NB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 1259 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 362 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 362 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.79 TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 6800 RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) Major LT Shared Lane Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.68 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 3: TH from Minor Street WB EB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 3668 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 8 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.68 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 5 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 1.00 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 4: LT from Minor Street WB EB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 3668 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 5 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0.68 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.68 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.68 Movement Capacity: (pcph) -------------------------------------------------------- 3 � j4.: o-s 98- 21 HCS: Unsignalized zersections Release 2.1c BISSST.HCO Page 3 Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) -------- ------ (pcph) (pcph)(sec/veh) ------ ------ (veh) -------------- (sec/veh) EB L 47 3 > ----- --------- EB T 0 5> 4 * 28.2 F EB R 13 947 > NB L 76 362 12.6 0.9 C 0.4 Intersection Delay = 395.3 sec/veh * The calculated value was greater than 999.9. 9 8 2lig �� HCS: Unsignalized :ersections Release 2.1c BISBSTF.HCO Page 1 -------------------------------- Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 Streets: (N-S) Biscayne Boulevard (E-W) NE 8 Street Major Street Direction.... NS Length of Time Analyzed... 60.(min) Analyst ................... DPA Date of Analysis.......... 9/18/97 Other Information......... Future 1999 Traffic Conditions with Pro ject Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection -------------- Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes Stop/Yield Volumes PHF Grade MCI s (�) SU/RV's (!k) CV, s (�) PCE's ------------ 0 > 4 < 0 N 69 2338 2 .95 .95 .95 0 1.10 --------------- 0 > 4 < 0 N 13 1206 43 .95 .95 .95 0 1.10 --------------- 0 > 1 < 0 43 1 12 .95 .95 .95 0 1.10 1.10 1.10 ---------------- Adjustment Factors 1 1 < 0 2 1 29 .95 .95 .95 0 1.10 1.10 1.10 --------------- Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) ------------------------------------------------------------------ Left Turn Major Road 5.50 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.50 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 7.00 3.40 D-10 98- 219 HCS: Unsi'gnalized itersections Release 2.1_. BIS8STF.HCO Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection -------------------------------------------------------- Step 1: RT from Minor Street WB EB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 616 340 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 675 931 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 675 931 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.95 0.98 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 2: LT from Major Street SB NB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 2463 1314 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 82 338 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 82 338 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.82 0.76 TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 6800 6800 RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 1700 Major LT Shared Lane Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.77 0.63 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 3: TH from Minor Street WB EB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 3863 3842 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 6 6 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.48 0.48 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 3 3 Prob. of_Queue-Free State: 0.67 0.67 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 4: LT from Minor Street WB EB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 3820 3840 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 4 4 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0.32 0.32 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.45 0.45 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.45 0.43 Movement Capacity: (pcph) -------------------------------------------------------- 2 2 D-„ 9$" 219t-6/ HCS: Unsignalized :ersections Release 2.1( BISSSTF.HCO Page 3 xxxaxxzxxxxxaxxaxxxxx==xxsa=c=co=.a..xxx=xsxxxo=ox=xxxo=cc=====xc_�_=__ Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph) (sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh) --------- EB L ------ 50 ------ ------ 2 > ------- ------- ----- --------- EB T 1 3> 3 * 31.1 F EB R 14 931 > WB L 2 2 * 0.8 F WB T 1 3 > 284.8 WB R 34 675 > 91 63.8 1.8 F NB L 80 338 13.9 1.0 C 0.4 SB L 15 82 53.7 0.7 F 0.6 Intersection Delay = 593.1 sec/veh * The calculated value was greater than 999.9. D-12 HCM: SIGNALIZED IN'^ERSECTION SUMMARY Versic- 2.4d 09-24-1997 - Centk For Microcomputers In Tra portation ------------------------------------------------- Streets: (E-W) N.E. 8 Street (N-S) Biscayne Boulevard Analyst: DPA File Name: BIS8STFI.HC9 Area Type: Other 9-17-97 PM PK H Comment: FUTURE 1999 TRAFFIC CONDITIONS W PROJECT.WITH IMPROVEMENTS Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R ---- ---- ---- L T R ---- ---- L T R L T R No. Lanes > 1 < ---- 1 1 < ---- ---- ---- > 4 < ---- ---- ---- > 4 < Volumes 43 1 12 2 1 29 69 2338 2 13 1206 43 Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vols 0 5 0 15 Lost Time 13.00 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left * NB Le f t Thru * Thru Right * Right Peds Peds WB Left * SB Left Thru * Thru Right * Right Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 30.OA Green 80.OP Yellow/AR 5.0 Yellow/AR 5.0 Cycle Length: 120 secs Phase combination order: #1 #5 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Intersection Performance Summary - Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow ----- Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS ----------- EB LTR 380 1426 ----- ----- ----- --- 0.155 0.267 25.6 D ----- --- 25.6 D WB L 394 1476 0.005 0.267 24.6 C 24.9 C TR 413 1548 0.065 0.267 25.0 C NB DfL 117 171 0.625 0.683 7.8 B 3.5 A TR 3685 5392 0.735 0.683 3.4 A SB DfL 99 145 0.141 0.683 5.1 B 2.1 A TR 3672 5374 0.389 0.683 2.0 A Intersection Delay = 3.5 sec/veh Intersection LOS = A Lost Time/Cycle, L = 6.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.572 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- .:.' D 13 t 98- 219 lkfl HCM: SIGNALIZED IN :SECTION SUMMARY Versioi ..4d 09-23-1997 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation Streets: (E-W) I-395 Ramp/NE 11 TER (N-S) Biscayne Boulevard Analyst: DPA File Name: BISIITR.HC9 Area Type: Other 9-17-97 PM PK H Comment: EXISTING (1997) TRAFFIC CONDITIONS ------------------------------------- ---------------------------------- IEastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes Volumes Lane W (ft) RTOR Vols Lost Time 2 630 12.0 3.00 1 54 12.0 40 3.00 ----------------- Signal Operations 3 1394 12.0 3.00 1 641 12.0 0 3.00 3 1101 12.0 15 3.00 Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left * NB Le f t Thru Thru Right * Right Peds Peds WB Left SB Left Thru Thru Right Right Peds Peds NB Right * EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 51.OA Green 54.OP Yellow/AR 5.0 Yellow/AR 5.0 Cycle Length: 115 secs Phase combination order: #1 #5 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS --- ----- EB L ---- 1236 ------- 2681 ----- 0.553 ----- ----- 0.461 17.4 --- C ----- 17.3 C R 620 1346 0.024 0.461 12.8 B NB T 2523 5182 0.640 0.487 13.4 B 9.5 B R 1439 1439 0.469 1.000 0.2 A SB T 2506 5147 0.509 0.487 12.1 B 12.1 B Intersection Delay = 11.6 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B Lost Time/Cycle, ----------------------------------------------------------------------- L = 6.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.597 D-14 98- 219 HCM: SIGNALIZED IN""RSECTION SUMMARY Versior- '2.4d 09-24-1997 Cente For Microcomputers In Tra. dortation Streets: (E-W) I-395 Ramp/NE 11 TER (N-S) Biscayne Boulevard Analyst: DPA File Name: BISIITRF.HC9 Area Type: Other 9-17-97 PM PK H Comment: FUTURE 1999 TRAFFIC CONDITIONS W PROJECT --------------------------------------------- Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- No. Lanes 2 1 3 1 3 Volumes 656 64 1474 675 1154 Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vols 40 0 15 Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left * NB Left Thru Thru Right * Right Peds Peds WB Left SB Left Thru Thru Right Right Peds Peds NB Right * EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 51.OA Green 54.OP Yellow/AR 5.0 Yellow/AR 5.0 Cycle Length: 115 secs Phase combination order: #1 #5 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS ----- ----------- ----- ----- ----- --- ----- --- EB L 1236 2681 0.576 0.461 17.7 C 17.5 C R 620 1346 0.040 0.461 12.9 B NB T 2523 5182 0.676 0.487 13.9 B 9.9 B R 1439 1439 0.494 1.000 0.2 A SB T 2506 5147 0.533 0.487 12.4 B 12.4 B Intersection Delay = 11.9 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B Lost Time/Cycle, L = 6.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.628 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- .I D -15 , I �$- 219 b HCM: SIGNALIZED INT-'RSECTION SUMMARY Versior-".4d 09-23-1997 Cente. or Microcomputers In Trar, 2ortation Streets: (E-W) I395/NE 13 Terr N-S Biscayne Boulevard Analyst: DPA File Name: BISI3TE.HC9 Area Type: Other 9-17-97 PM PK H Comment: EXISTING 1997 TRAFFIC CONDITIONS ------------------------------------ Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- No. Lanes 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 Volumes 313 168 115 63 1347 880 65 Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vols 60 15 60 Lost Time 1 13.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left NB Left Thru Thru Right Right Peds Peds WB Left * SB Left Thru * Thru Right * Right Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 19.OA Green 8.OP 75.OA Yellow/AR 5.0 Yellow/AR 3.0 5.0 Cycle Length: 115 secs Phase combination order: #1 #5 #6 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS ----- ----------- ----- ----- ----- --- ----- --- WB L 530 2903 0.764 0.183 37.4 D 34.9 D T 631 3455 0.295 0.183 30.9 D R 268 1468 0.216 0.183 30.4 D NB L 257 1641 0.257 0.765 0.1 A 0.2 A T 2617 3420 0.569 0.765 0.2 A SB T 2313 3455 0.420 0.670 2.5 A 2.5 A R 964 1439 0.005 0.670 1.8 A Intersection Delay = 8.0 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B Lost Time/Cycle, L = 6.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.607 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- D-16 98- 219 HCM: SIGNALIZED IN :SECTION SUMMARY Version .4d 09-24-1997 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation Streets: (E-W) I395/NE 13 Terr (N-S) Biscayne Boulevard Analyst: DPA File Name: BISI3TER.HC9 Area Type: Other 9-17-97 PM PK H Comment: FUTURE 1999 TRAFFIC CONDITIONS W PROJECT ----------------------------- Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R ---- L T R ---- ---- ---- No. Lanes ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- 2 2 1 ---- ---- 1 2 2 1 Volumes 391 175 120 80 1412 921 72 Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vols 60 15 60 Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left NB Left Thru Thru Right Right Peds Peds WB Left * SB Left Thru * Thru Right * Right Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 19.OA Green 8.OP 75.OA Yellow/AR 5.0 Yellow/AR 3.0 5.0 Cycle Length: 115 secs Phase combination order: #1 #5 #6 - Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow . Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS ----- --- ----- --- ----- WB L ----------- ----- ----- 530 2903 0.800 0.183 38.7 D 35.8 D T 631 3455 0.306 0.183 31.0 D R 268 1468 0.235 0.183 30.6 D NB L 251 1641 0.335 0.765 0.2 A 0.2 A T 2617 3420 0.596 0.765 0.2 A SB T 2313 3455 0.440 0.670 2.6 A 2.6 A R 964 1439 0.013 0.670 1.8 A Intersection Delay = 8.2 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B Lost Time/Cycle, L = 6.0 sec Critical v/c W = 0.635 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- D - 17 98- 219 APPENDIX E Land Use Exchange Rates for Downtown Miami DRI p 0 n 98- 2t9 /41 o� 04 1 ao Table - LAND USE E%CHANGE•RATES FOR DOWNTOWN ORi (per gross square footpe, except as otherwise indicated) Office Retail/ Hotel Residential Service (per room) (per 4.u.) Convention Wholesale/ institutional Attractions/ Marine industrial Recreation Facilities (per seat) x if 0.000598S 0.000519 0.202 0&1360563 0.1360563 0 000114 0.00132 0.0020588 0.0005985 Office 0.0005285 1.0000 1.1532 0.0030 0.0044 5.2500 4.5204 0.4534 Retail/Service 0.000519 0.8672 1.0000 0.0026 0.0038 0.2907 1.0000 4.5526 3.9199 0.3932 0.2521 0.8672 Hotel (per room) fn 0.202 337.5104 389.2100 1.0000 1.4847 1.771.9298 1.525.6789 153.0303 _. Residential (per d.u.) 0.1360563 227.3288 262.1509 0.673E 1.0000 98.1151 337.5101 1,193.4763 1.027.6156 103.0730 66.0852 227.3288 Convention 0.000114 0.190S 0.2197 0.0006 0.0008 1.0000 0.8610 0.0861 Wholesale/Industrial 0.0001324 0.2212 0.2551 0.0007 0.0010 O.05S4 0.1905 1.1614 1.0000 O.I003 0.06/3 0.2212 iAStItuienal 0.00132 2.2066 2.5434 0.0065 0.0097 11.6789 9.9698 1.0000 Attractions/Recreation 0.6/12 2.2055 (per seat) 0.00205" 3.43" 3.9669 0.0102 0.0151 18.0596 15.5498 1.5597 Marine Facilities 0.000S985 1.0000 .1532 0.0030 Q0044 6.2500 1.0000 3.4399 ---- 4.610/ 0.4534 0.2907 1.0000 D A a i formula for calculation x/y • exchange rota s - a x and y derived both represent the number of PM Peak Hour from the Downtown Miami A.D.A. External Motor Vehicle Trip Ends per unit of land use o r* . C7 A,2 dP° i 98- 419 �5 Exhibit A-2 Downtown DRI Maritime Park Arena Transportation Management Plan Outline TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Special Events Intersection Geometrics...................................... 1 • Temporary de -activation of traffic signals ..................................... 2 • Turn Prohibitions.......................................................2 2. Adjustment of Roadway Geometrics during Special Events ...................... 2 • Closure of median openings ............................................... 2 3. Reversible Lanes........................................................2 • Imbalanced Lanes.......................................................3 • Conversion from two-way to one-way streets, and vice -versa ...................... 3 • Contra -Flow bus lanes...................................................3 4. Police Traffic Control .................................................... 3 5. Traffic Signal Improvements ............................................... 3- Intersection equipment replacement ......................................... 3 • Improved traffic control devices ............................................ 3 • Signal timing plans designed specially for times when a special event is in place ......... 3 • Enhanced pedestrian signal equipment ........................................ 3 • Bus traffic signal pre-emption .............................................. 3 6. Expressway Directional Signs .............................................. 3 • Traffic control signs to direct traffic on local streets ............................. 3 • Intelligent Transportation Systems .......................................... 4 7. Access and Parking Information ............................................ 4 • Developing an Internet Web site ............................................ 4 • Working with the media to provide information ................................ 4 • Providing route, access, and parking information ................................ 4 • Developing a "hotline" for patrons .......................................... 4 • The development of an arena guide book ..................................... 4 8. Transit................................................................4 • Creation of Bus/Shuttle drop-off areas ....................................... 4 9 8 - • Feeder Bus system......................................................4 • Shuttle System......................................................... 4 • Promoting transit passes .................................................. 4 • Adjusting the Metrorail/Metromover schedule .................................. 4 • Creating fixed routes and express bus services ................................... 4 • Providing off-street transit loading zones ..................................... 4 9. Other High Occupancy Vehicle Alternatives .................................. 5 • Creation of reversible High Occupancy Vehicle lanes ............................ 5 • High Occupancy preferential parking ......................................... 5 10. Other Modes of Transportation ........................................... 5 • Enhanced pedestrian crosswalks ............................................ 5 • Enhancing sidewalks to encourage pedestrian access ............................. 5 • Promoting car pooling ................................................... 5 • Promoting other modes of transportation such as water taxis ...................... 5 j 98- 219 Exhibit A-2 Downtown DRI Maritime Park Arena Transportation Management Plan Outline A Transportation Management Plan (TMP) will be developed to accommodate the Maritime Park Arena volumes during special events. The plan recognizes that the Maritime Park Arena traffic can be absorbed by the existing street system if supported by special operational plans during event hours. This is due to the fact that most Maritime Park Arena events will occur during the "off-peak" hours of roadway use. The plan also recognizes the importance of police assisted traffic control, car pooling, use of available transit, directional signage and the like. It is possible that several sub -plans will be developed depending on the level of patronage. A Miami Heat sellout, for instance, will have a more comprehensive plan than an event not expected to fill the Maritime Park Arena. The following list is a compilation of potential strategies which will form the basis for the Maritime Park Arena TMP. The plan will be submitted to the agencies reviewing this element of the traffic study. The plan will be adjusted, as needed, prior to the Maritime Park Arena obtaining a Certificate of Occupancy. 1. Special Events Intersection Geometrics. This will consist of temporarily revising lane geometrics at key intersections in order to allow, for example, double turn lanes. This temporary measure will accommodate additional demand created by special events and recognizes the directionallity of access to/from events. In order to assure successful operations, these temporary turn lanes will be police controlled. Temporary traffic control devices will also be required. These include, but are not limited to, roadside signs, barricades, and traffic cones. The extent to which these modifications will be recommended will depend on the size of the event. This strategy will be especially useful in the vicinity of project driveways where turning movement volumes will be significantly increased during special events. Other strategies that may be considered under this technique include: • Temporary de -activation of traffic sign _sai . Signals that may warranted during the pm peak hour may not be needed during event hours. These signals may be operated in flashing operations mode during event hours. Police assistance at these intersections may be required. • Turn Prohibitions. Turns from the minor streets would be limited to right turns only during an event (i.e., eastbound approaches to Biscayne Boulevard from NE 9 Street, NE 10 Street, etc.). 2. Adjushnent of Roadway Geometrics during Special Events. This will consist of temporarily revising lane geometrics at roadway links in order to minimize delays and/or conflicts during special events. • Closure of median Qming_s. Median openings along Biscayne Boulevard may be closed during special events in order to minimize conflicts. This measure would minimize delays of traffic destined to and from the special event, as well as minimizing conflicts and potential accidents. I Reversible Lanes. This strategy would provide the site with additional lanes to facilitate access when high demand is in one direction only (i.e., entering or exiting a special event). This can be a partial as well as a total modification. For example, NE 8 Street is generally a two-way roadway. The Maritime Park Arena is proposing a driveway that would align with NE 8 Street. During special events, the roadway can be converted to a 2-lane, one-way eastbound road when patrons are entering a special event. The pattern can be reversed to a one-way westbound road to accommodate the additional outbound demand. Police control, as well as traffic control devices, will be required to successfully implement this strategy. 2 - 219 The Maritime Park Arena entrances will most likely be reversible and/or imbalanced. Other options that will be studied include: • Imbalanced lanes (i.e., converting a 4 lane, 2-way road into 3 lanes in one direction and one in the other). • Conversion from two-way to one-way streets, and vice -versa. • Contra -Flow bus lanes. 4. Police Traffic Control. Signal timing may be overridden by police officers at intersections of high demand during special events- This would enable traffic to flow more rapidly in the direction of additional demand. 5. Traffic Signal Improvements. Traffic signal improvements can enhance the overall traffic operations of a roadway network. Related strategies may include: • Intersection equipment replacement. • Improved traffic. control devices. • Signal timing plans designed specially for times when a special event is in place. • Enhanced pedestrian signal equipment. • Bus traffic signal pre-emption. 6. Expressway Directional Signs. The project site can be accessed from two expressways: I-95 and I-395. Numerous ramps and interchanges service the Downtown Miami area providing ample capacity and access to accommodate project traffic during special events. Because of the multi entry/exit points in Downtown Miami, dispersing traffic loads without compromising travel time is possible. However, it is important to inform motorists of their alternatives because many may be unfamiliar with Downtown Miami. Signs, either conventional or variable message (intelligent system), can 3 98- 219-1,6/ achieve this goal of distributing traffic throughout the system. Additional elements that can be studied as part of this strategy are: • Traffic control signs to direct traffic on local streets. • Intelligent Transportation Systems. 7. Access and Parking Information. This strategy would provide season ticket holders and the general public with information/maps on recommended routing to the Maritime Park Arena and available parking areas on and off site. By doing so, it will be possible to take advantage of the multi access points to Downtown Miami and also allow the patron to plan ahead on their parking destination. This strategy is expected to be especially effective since patrons of the events proposed at this site are repeat users (ticket holders) who will become familiar with the pattern quickly. Additional strategies may include: • Developing an Internet Web site that provides text and maps of key access points, routes, and parking destinations. • Working with the media to provide this information via newscasts, the newspaper, radio, etc. • Providing route, access, and parking information/maps with season ticket mailings, single game ticket purchases, etc.. • Developing a "hotline" for patrons with questions regarding route, access, parking information, and public transit information. • The development of an arena guide book made available to patrons which will include information on issues such as parking, transit, access, and routes to the site. 8. Transit. Transit routes and schedules may be adjusted to accommodate special events. Other related strategies are: • Creation of Bus/Shuttle drop-off areas. A lane on Biscayne Boulevard may need to be temporarily closed by using traffic cones to provide a bustshuttle drop-off area. • Feeder Bus system. 4 98- 219 • Shuttle System (Private or Public) from Metrorail, remote parking areas, and the like. • Promoting transit passes throughout the downtown area during special events. • Adjusting the Metrorail/Metromover schedule during special events. • Creating fixed routes and express bus services. • Providing off-street transit loading zones. 9. Other High Occupancy Vehicle Alternatives. This strategy is designed to promote higher vehicle occupancies by giving preferential treatment to vehicles with more than 2 occupants. Related strategies include: • Creation of reversible High Occupancy Vehicle lanes during special events. This task may include the creation of buses and/or shuttle service around the downtown area for event patrons. • High Occupancy preferential parking. 10. Other Modes of Transportation. The purpose of this strategy is to reduce the vehicle trip - ends to the special event by encouraging transit use, increase auto occupancy, and the like. Additional strategies may include: • Enhanced pedestrian crosswalks. • Enhancing sidewalks to encourage pedestrian access. • Promoting car pooling. • Promoting other modes of transportation such as water taxis. TMP I .RPr 5 98- 219 169 1 98- Exhibit A-3 Downtown DRI Maritime Park Arena Development Strategies Which Promote Linkages Between the Project and The Downtown/Southeast Overtown Park West Community TABLE OF CONTENTS A. Pedestrian Linkages......................................................1 1. Off -site Parking/Walk.....:............................................ 1 a. Pedestrian Focal Points .............................................. 1 b. Port Boulevard Pedestrian Bridge ....................................... 2 c. Pedestrian Friendly Areas .......... ............... ................. 2 B. Transit/Walk...........................................................3 C. Shuttles................................................................3 D. Water Taxi.............................................................4 98- 2143 Exhibit A-3 Downtown DRI Maritime Park Arena Development Strategies Which Promote Linkages Between the Project and The Downtown/Southeast Overtown Park West Community l Z7.:. 1r _ Pedestrian access to the project is critical to the success of the facility. Project design places great importance on pedestrian access in as much as on -site parking is limited. This translates into the majority of the arena patrons ultimately reaching the site by means other than automobiles. There are four potential modes of access for -patrons that do not park at the site: off -site parking/walk, transit/walk, shuttle, and water taxi. This linkages proposal recognizes that while the arena operators do control the physical features of the arena site, most of the potential modes of access are not controlled by them. A partnership is needed between the Downtown Development Authority (DDA), the City of Miami, Dade County, the Florida Department of Transportation, transit operators, parking operators, and area businesses. The Arena management is committed to, and supportive of, these partnerships. 1. Off -site Parking/Walk The largest component of site access will be patrons parking in adjacent lots and garages in the immediate vicinity (4 blocks) of the arena. These patrons will most likely be walking to the site using the existing sidewalks. Linkages to these parking facilities in Downtown and Southeast Overtown Park West will be primarily at grade and may be supplemented in the form of pedestrian bridges. a. Pedestrian Focal Points These are at -grade pedestrian crossings that cater to and channelize pedestrians into and out of the arena site. Pedestrian Focal Points are anticipated at several Biscayne . , y8- 219 05 I. Boulevard locations in front of the site: NE 6th, 7th,- 8th, and 9th Streets. Pedestrian bridges were considered for Biscayne Boulevard. However, structures at these locations are both ineffective, and incompatible with the aesthetics of the planned Biscayne Boulevard. Special treatment of these Focal Points should include: well marked, oversized crosswalks; large refuge space at the intersection sidewalks and Biscayne Boulevard median; large display pedestrian signals; pedestrian cycle signal actuation (push buttons); special event pedestrian signal timing plan; police control; etc. b. Port Boulevard Pedestrian Bridge The volume and type of traffic on Port -Boulevard make that facility better suited for a pedestrian bridge. Dade County plans to build a bridge over Port Boulevard connecting the plaza level of the arena (north side of Port Boulevard) with the upper level of Bayside and the City Marina areas (on the south side). A pedestrian bridge at the location will provide a linkage to the Downtown area immediately south, and will facilitate the flow of pedestrian traffic from the Bayside/City Marina area. c. Pedestrian Friendly Areas The area four blocks around the arena will experience heavy pedestrian traffic generated by patrons parking nearby. Pedestrian amenities will strengthen the linkages to off -site parking facilities in Downtown and the Southeast Overtown Park West areas. In general, these amenities could include wide sidewalks, landscaping, lighting security, etc. (see section on Urban Design and Landscaping). The initiative of the City, DDA and private enterprises will be needed to the effect these strategies over time. It is expected that the new arena will be a catalyst for development of properties west of Biscayne Boulevard. As such, it is anticipated that the new developments created as a result will enhance and provide urban development improvements as part of their development strategies. 2 219 The Florida Department of Transportation is undertaking a Project Design and Environment Study for the section of Biscayne Boulevard (US 1) between Port Boulevard and I-395. The PD&E study will evaluate alternatives, assess the impacts, and make final recommendations regarding the ultimate configuration of US 1. Preliminary analysis suggests that the typical cross section could be about 168 ft, as follows: 2-15' sidewalks (to replace the existing sidewalks ranging in width between 6' and 12% 8-1 P lanes (4 in each direction to replace the eight existing lanes), and a 50' median (to replace the current painted median). This design is very sensitive to pedestrian needs. It provides a wider sidewalk, as well as a wide median refuge areas. The Burle Marx paving design, already adopted by the City, will be used for the sidewalk areas. Appropriate landscaping and other pedestrian amenities consistent with the area will be considered during the preliminary design. B. Tcansit/Walk A transit pedestrian corridor is desirable to provide a linkage from major transit facilities to the arena. This linkage can also be used as a pedestrian linkage to Downtown and Southeast Overtown/Parkwest. The most effective corridor would be one connecting the arena to the Overtown MetroRail Station via NE/NW 7 Street and NW 8 Street. This route is four blocks - long, and fairly direct. It will also bring the pedestrians to the NE 7th Street crossing, away from the busier NE 5th, 6th, and 8th Streets intersections which are dominated by vehicular traffic. Pedestrian amenities could be provided as described above. Similar transit pedestrian corridors, perhaps blending into the Pedestrian Friendly Areas described above, could be provided for other transit facilities such as the following MetroMover stations: Bayfront Park, First Street, College/Bayside, College North, Freedom Tower, Park West, Eleventh Street, and Bicentennial Park. The leadership of DDA and the City will be required in the proactive pursuit of these strategies. C. Shuttl Shuttle linkages should be implemented to establish connections with the Downtown and Southeast Overtown/Park West areas, as well as connections with other elements of the 91 { 1 M, 98- 219_ transportation system. Several shuttle routes (designated by colors and/or symbols -wayfaring) will be needed to service: areas residents and workers; transit riders from the MetroRail's Overtown and Government Center Stations, passengers from the MetroBus transfer station on Flagler Street, and transit users from the more remote MetroMover stations; patrons parking in nearby lots and garages, as well as, remote parking facilities; hotels, and major area attractions, restaurants, etc. Shuttle stops on Biscayne Boulevard, north of NE 8 Street will provide convenient shuttle and pedestrian access for ease of use and efficiency. Shuttle staging areas, however, must be designated to ensure that sufficient buses are immediately available after the events to accommodate the concentrated demand. Such capacity is needed both to provide adequate service to the public (with minimal wait time) and. to be able to efficiently feed higher capacity systems such as MetroRail. The cooperation of the Dade County Transit Agency will be important in implementing the transit related routes and supporting shuttle services. The continued leadership of the City of Miami and DDA will be needed to effect other supporting shuttle services offered by Downtown businesses. DDA has already mentioned the potential use of the Flagler Street and Brickell electric shuttle buses and trams in the evenings and weekends. D. Water Taxi Downtown has water on two sides: the Biscayne Bay and Miami River. Water taxis are mostly an amenity. It is, admittedly, a low capacity connection. However, it should not be discarded. Water taxis can provide an additional linkage to the Downtown areas and Southeast Overtown Park West. Arena patrons could board taxis at locations such as the City of Miami Building, Fort Dallas Park (the Hyatt), Dupont Plaza, Sheraton Hotel, Intercontinental Hotel, Bayside, etc. The arena end of the trip could be on the east side of the arena or the north side. Water taxi facilities, however, must be provided as part of the future Maritime Park development. 97117PL 4 98- 219 FEB. -24� 98 (TUE) I6: 25 P. 002 34 The City shall require that the Operator submit a parking inventory as part of the traffic control management plan required to be submitted under the Major Use Special Permit for the Arena (the "Parking Inventory"). The Parking Inventory will identify the location of not less than 7,500 parking spaces guaranteed to be available for parking for events at the Arena (the "Guaranteed Spaces"). The Operator shall be permitted to submit a modification to the Parking Inventory on an amival basis, which modification must be approved by the City Commission. The modification, which must be submitted to the Planning Department of the City, shall confirm that the minimum number of Guaranteed Spaces are being provided. The Operator will have the obligation to insure that the Guaranteed Spaces will be available each and every year during the first ten (10) years of operation of the Arena The Guaranteed Spaces will be located within it reasonable proximity to the Arena. The on -site parking will be considered part of the required Guaranteed Spaces. The traffic control management plan will also address issues relating to shuttle services for the Arena in conjunction with shuttle initiatives being studied by the Applicant. The Operator agrees to submit interim reports on the status of the traffic control management plan to the City Manager at six (6) month intervals, until such time as the plan has been approved by the City Commission. It is understood that the traffic control management plan must be submitted for City Commission approval at least six (6) months prior to the issuance of the temporary certificate of occupancy for the Arena. 35. The Applicant shall form and chair a committee to act as coordinator of events in the Downtown area (the "Events Committee"). Specifically, the Events Committee shall use its good faith efforts to coordinate the scheduling of events, with a special focus on traffic and parking related issues, at the following facilities: (i) American Airlines Arena; (ii) the Performing Arts Center; (iii) Bay$ont Park; (iv) the Mami Arena; (v) Bayside Specialty Center; and (vi) the Miami Gambling Ship (collectively the "Facilities"). The Applicant shall require that each of the Facilities appoint a representative to sit on the Committee and shall use its best faith efforts to ensure that the representatives participate in the scheduling of events. MIA05 209542.1 - LXC r P2-f7_ 98-►# CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO Honorable Chairman and Members of the City Commission FROM Jose Garcia -Pedrosa City Manager DATE: February 23, 1998 SUBJECT: First Source Hiring /\ Agreement FILE Attached you will find the First Source Hin'Agreement recommended by the Administration and agreed to by the Miami Heat in connection with the new arena. This will be discussed at the City Commission meeting tomorrow during item PZ 17. Please provide any additional suggestions, comments or revisions. O" JGP:CMC:nr c: Honorable Mayor Xavier L. Suarez 98- 219 MIAMI FIRST SOURCE HIRING AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made this day of February, 1998, by and between the City of Miami, a municipal corporation of the State of Florida (the "City") and Basketball Properties, Ltd., a Florida limited partnership (the "BPL"). RECITALS: A. BPL and Miami -Dade County, Florida, a political subdivision of the State of Florida (the "County") entered into a series of agreements (the "Arena Agreements") with respect to the development, management and operation of a new multi -purpose sports and entertainment facility to be built on a waterfront location in downtown Miami (the "Project"). The Arena Agreements consist of the following agreements: 1. Development Agreement dated as of April 29, 1997, by and between the County and BPL. 2. Management Agreement dated as of April 29, 1997, by and between the County and BPL (the "Manager Agreement"). 3. Miami Heat License Agreement dated as of April 29, 1997, by and among the County, BPL and Miami Heat Limited Partnership, a Florida limited partnership (the "Miami Heat"). 4. Assurance Agreement dated as of April 29, 1997, among the County, the Miami Heat, and BPL. 5. Composite Amendment One to Arena Agreements dated as of December 10, 1997 by and between the County, the Miami Heat, and BPL. B. In order to ensure at least 30% participation in the Project by small and middle level business enterprises located in 98- 219 Miami -Dade County, BPL has developed a program design to ensure that not less than 15.45% of the construction work will be performed by small local business enterprises pursuant to BPL's program which is based, in part, on County Ordinance No. 97-52, as amended, relating to Small Business Enterprise and 14.65% of the construction will be performed by middle level business enterprises located in Miami -Dade County. A copy of BPL's business enterprises plan is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" (the "Local Business Enterprise Plan"). C. To supplement the local community involvement in the Project to be generated by the Local Business Enterprise Plan, BPL has agreed to comply with Section 18-105 of the City of Miami Code to foster participation in the construction and operation of the Project by unemployed and underemployed residents of the City of Miami, including, but not limited to those who are participants of City training and employment programs and other residents of the City. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of ten dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereby agree as follows: 1. Recitals. The recitals to this Agreement are true and correct and hereby incorporate herein by reference and made a part hereof. 2. Construction. 2 98- 219 2.1. The City acknowledges that BPL is currently negotiating a construction services agreement with Morse Diesel International, Inc./Odebrecht Contractors of Florida, Inc. (the "Contractor") with respect to the construction of the Project. BPL agrees to utilize its diligent, good faith efforts to cause the Contractor and each of the subcontractors retained by the Contractor to first give every employment opportunity generated by the Project to qualified unemployed and underemployed residents of the City of Miami, including, but not limited to those who are participants in the City's training and employment programs, providing first priority to residents of the Community Development Block Grant ("CDBG") target area in which the Project is located; and second priority to residents of other CDBG target areas in the City before extending the opportunities to other City of Miami residents. BPL's obligation to use its diligent, good faith efforts shall include, without limitation, requiring the Contractor and its subcontractors to do the following: 2.1.1. Utilize the assistance of the Office of Workforce Development (the "OWD") as the screening and referral source for employment for the Project. After each subcontract is awarded, the Contractor shall be required to inform OWD of the number of positions needed and the minimum qualifications required for each position identified to the Contractor by each subcontractor at least five (5) business days in advance of the commencement of work required under the subcontract In addition, the Contractor shall be required to inform OWD of the number of 3 98- 219 positions needed and the minimum qualifications required for each position required by the Contractor at least five (5) business days in advance of the date the Contractor will require such personnel; 2.1.2. In the event that City of Miami residents are to be replaced during the course of the Project, BPL will require the Contractor to contact OWD for assistance in identifying the replacements that are required. OWD shall make its referral to the Contractor within three (3) business days; 2.1.3. Cause the Contractor to advertise in local minority media and NET 9, the City of Miami community television channel, seeking to attract unemployed and underemployed residents of the City of Miami to seek employment at the Project; and 2.2. In the event that OWD is unable to identify qualified persons to fill all the positions identified by the Contractor within the respective time frames provided for in Sections 2.1.1 and 2.2.2 above, any unfilled positions may be filled by any qualified person, irrespective of their residence. 2.3. The City acknowledges that all employees of the Project will be required not only to have the required employment skills but also comply with the requirements of the Project insurance policy, including, without limitation, requirements for a drug free workplace. In addition, the City acknowledges that various employment opportunities will require union membership. 4 98- 2-19 2.4. To the extent feasible, OWD shall assist the Project in upgrading the skill level of the City of Miami residents. 2.5. To the extent that the procedures set forth in this Section are in conflict with the procedures implemented by the Contractor in order to comply with the Arena Agreements and applicable federal, state and local laws, the Contractor may substitute other procedures in order to accomplish the purpose and intent of this Agreement. 3. Permanent Job Placement. 3.1. Upon completion of construction of the Project, BPL shall make diligent, good faith efforts to first give every new employment opportunity generated by the Project with respect to the Project's operation to unemployed and underemployed residents of the City of Miami, including, without limitation, those who are participants in the City's training and employment programs, providing first priority to residents of the CDBG target area where the Project is located, and second priority to residents of other CDBG target areas in the City before extending the opportunities to other City of Miami residents. This objective is specifically designed to increase the number of skilled and semi -skilled employment positions available first to residents of the CDBG target area where the Project is located, second to residents of other CDBG target areas in the City, and third to other City of Miami residents. BPL's diligent, good faith effort shall include but not be limited to: 98- 219 3.1.1. advertising employment opportunities in the local minority media and NET 9, the City of Miami community, television channel; 3.1.2. utilize the assistance of the Office of Workforce Development (the "OWD") as the screening and referral source for employment for the Project. BPL shall be required to inform OWD of the number of positions needed and the minimum qualifications required for each position as soon as possible, but in no event less than five (5) business days in advance of the commencement of the work required; 3.1.3. in the event that City of Miami residents are to be replaced, BPL shall contact OWD for assistance in identifying the replacements that are required. OWD shall make its referral to BPL within three (3) business days; and 3.1.4. make every reasonable attempt to advise OWD of its hiring needs prior to the completion of the Project to enable OWD the opportunity to develop appropriate training programs. 3.2. In the event that OWD is unable to identify qualified persons to fill all the positions identified by BPL within the respective time frame provided for in Section 3.1.2 and 3.1.3 above, any unfilled positions may be filled by any qualified person, irrespective of their residence. 4. Monitoring. 4.1. Construction. OWD, as agent for the City, shall visit the Project site monthly, or as needed, to review BPL's 6 98- 219 progress relating to meeting its construction hiring objectives. OWD, as agent for the City, shall have access to all records pertaining to employment by the Contractor and subcontractors on the Project. 4.2. Management and Maintenance Operations. OWD, as agent for the City, shall visit the Project monthly to review BPL's progress relating to meeting the Project's operating objectives. OWD, as agent for the City, shall have access to all employment records of BPL relating to the Project's operation. Attached as Exhibit "D" is a form to be utilized during the monitoring visit. 4.3. Acknowledgement. BPL, or its designee, shall be required to sign the monitoring forms acknowledging that the Project was monitored. If BPL determines that the findings of the monitor as recorded on the forms do not actually reflect the level of participation in the Project, BPL shall submit a written statement stating its objections to the City within ten (10) business days from receipt of the form in question. 5. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Florida. 6. Conflicts of Interest• City Representative is Not Individually Liable. No member, official, representative, or employee of the City or the City Manager shall have any personal interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement, nor shall any such member, official, representative or employee participate in any decision relating to this Agreement which affects his or her personal interests or the interests of any corporation, partnership 7 98- 219 or association in which he or she is directly or indirectly, interested. No member, official, representative or employee of the City or the City Manager shall be personally liable to BPL or any successor in interest in the event of any default or breach by the City or the City Manager or for any amount which may become due to BPL or successors or on any obligations under the terms of this Agreement. 7. Notice. A notice of communication under this Agreement by the City or the City Manager on the one hand to BPL, or, on the other hand, by BPL to the City or the City Manager shall be sufficiently given or delivered if sent by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested or given by hand or otherwise actual delivery to such party as follows: If to BPL: Basketball Properties, Ltd. SunTrust International Center 1 S.E. Third Avenue Suite 2300 Miami, FL 33131 Attn: William L. Senn If to City: City Manager 3500 Pan American Drive Miami, Florida 33133 With a copy to: Office of Workforce Development 1313 N.W. 36th Street 2nd Floor, NationsBank Building Miami, FL 33142 Attention: Gwendolyn Warren 8 98- 219. or if such notice is addressed to such other way in respect to any of the foregoing parties as the party may, from time to time, designate in writing, dispatched as provided in this Section 7. 8. Titles of Articles and Sections. All titles of the several parts, articles and sections of this Agreement, are inserted for convenience of reference only and shall be disregarded in construing or interpreting any provisions of this Agreement. 9. Successors and Assigns. All the covenants, conditions and obligations contained in this Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns. 10. Records. BPL shall maintain its records in the City of Miami to enable the City to monitor BPL's performance under this Agreement and will permit the City to inspect such records upon reasonable notice. 11. Entire Agreement. This Agreement and its attachments constitute the sole and only agreement of the parties hereto with respect to Chapter 18-105 of the City of Miami Code and correctly sets forth the rights, duties and obligations of each to the other as of its date. Any prior agreements, promises, negotiations, or representations not expressly set forth in this Agreement are of no force and effect. 12. Termination. This Agreement shall remain in full force and effect until the termination of the Management Agreement. E 98- 219 13. Amendments. No amendment to this Agreement shall be binding on either party unless in writing and signed by both parties. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, BPL and the City executed this Agreement the day and year first above written. Witnesses: Attest: City Clerk Approved as to form and correctness: City Attorney MIA4-590734.5 BASKETBALL PROPERTIES, LTD., a Florida limited partnership By: Basketball Properties, Inc., general partner By: Williham L. Senn, Vice President THE CITY OF MIAMI, a municipal corporation of the State of Florida By: Jose Garcia -Pedrosa, City Manager 10 98- 219