Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
R-98-0103
J-98-77 1/15/98 RESOLUTION NO. 9 R- 103 A RESOLUTION, WITH ATTACHMENTS, APPROVING WITH CONDITIONS, A MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT PURSUANT TO ARTICLES 13 AND 17 OF ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 11000, FOR THE TERREMARK BRICKELL II PROJECT, TO BE LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY 1435 BRICKELL AVENUE, MIAMI, FLORIDA; TO BE COMPRISED OF A MIXED USE BUILDING WITH NOT MORE THAN 372,799 SQUARE FEET OF OFFICE SPACE, 246 HOTEL ROOMS, 40 RESIDENTIAL UNITS, 28,824 SQUARE FEET OF ACCESSORY COMMERCIAL/RETAIL SPACE AND 963 PARKING SPACES; DIRECTING TRANSMITTAL OF THE HEREIN RESOLUTION; MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATING CONCLUSIONS OF LAW; PROVIDING FOR BINDING EFFECT; CONTAINING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, on October 31, 1997, Terremark Brickell II, Ltd., a Florida Limited Partnership (°APPLICANT"), submitted a complete Application for Special Exception and Major Use Special Permit for the Terremark Brickell II Project ("PROJECT") pursuant to Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, Articles 13 and 17, for the property located at approximately 1435 Brickell Avenue, Miami, Florida, as legally described in "Exhibit A and WHEREAS, development of the PROJECT requires the issuance of a Major Use Special Permit pursuant to Article 17 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended; and ATTACHMENT ¢} CONTAINED CUT '[ nma Of'! JAN 2 7 W8 Reftl na8- 103 WHEREAS, the Large Scale Development Committee met on October 6, 1997 to offer its input pertaining to technical issues related to the PROJECT; and WHEREAS, the Urban Development Review Board met on November 13, 1997 and recommended approval of the proposed project; and WHEREAS, the Miami Planning Advisory Board, at its meeting of December 17, 1997, Item No. 3, following an advertised public hearing, adopted Resolution No. PAB 76-97 by a vote of five to zero (5-0), RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of the Major Use Special Permit Development Order as attached hereto, subject to APPLICANT complying with all conditions of the Development Order for the PROJECT; and WHEREAS, the City Commission deems it advisable and in the best interest of the general welfare of the City of Miami to issue a Major Use Special Permit Development Order for the PROJECT as hereinafter set forth; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. The recitals and findings contained in the Preamble to this Resolution are hereby adopted by reference thereto and incorporated herein as if fully set forth in this Section. -2- D8- 103 Section 2. A Major Use Special Permit Development Order, attached hereto as Exhibit "B" and made a part hereof, is hereby approved subject to the conditions specified in said Development Order, per Article 17 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, as amended, for the Terremark Brickell II Project (hereinafter referred to as the "PROJECT") to be developed by Terremark Brickell II, Ltd., a Florida Limited Partnership, (hereinafter referred to as the "APPLICANT"), at approximately 1435 Brickell Avenue, Miami, Florida, more particularly described in "Exhibit All, attached hereto and made a part hereof. Section 3. The PROJECT is hereby approved for the construction of up to 372,799 square feet of office space, 246 hotel rooms and 40 residential units with 28,824 square feet of accessory commercial space and 963 parking spaces. Section 4. The findings of fact set forth below are hereby made with respect to the subject PROJECT: a. The PROJECT is in conformity with the adopted Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000, as amended. b. The PROJECT is in accord with the SD-5 Zoning classifications of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended. C. Pursuant to Section 1305 of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, the specific site plan aspects -3- 98- 103 of the PROJECT, i.e., ingress and egress, parking, signs and lighting, utilities, drainage, preservation of natural features and control of potentially adverse effects generally, have been considered and will be further considered administratively during the process of issuing a building permit and a certificate of occupancy. d. The PROJECT is expected to cost approximately $186 million, and to employ approximately 174 workers during construction (FTE); and 480 employees annually (recurring). The PROJECT will generate approximately $3.8 million annually in ad valorem tax revenues to local units of government (1997 dollars). e. The City Commission further finds that: (1) the PROJECT will have a favorable impact on the economy of the City; (2) the PROJECT will efficiently use public transportation facilities; (3) any potentially adverse effects of the PROJECT will be mitigated through compliance with the conditions of this Major Use Special Permit; (4) the PROJECT will favorably affect the need for people to find adequate housing reasonably accessible to their places of employment; -4- 98- 103 (5) the PROJECT will efficiently use necessary public facilities; (6) the PROJECT will not negatively impact the environment and natural resources of the City; (7) the PROJECT will not adversely affect living conditions in the neighborhood; (8) the PROJECT will not adversely affect public safety; (9) based on the record presented and evidence presented, the public welfare will be served by the PROJECT; and (10) any potentially adverse effects of the PROJECT arising from safety and security, fire protection and life safety, solid waste, heritage conservation, trees, shoreline development, minority participation and employment, and minority contractor /subcontractor participation will be mitigated through compliance with the conditions of this Major Use Special Permit. Section 5. The Major Use Special Permit, as approved and amended, shall be binding upon the applicants and any successors in interest. -5- 98- 103 Section 6. The application for Major Use Special Permit, which was submitted on October 31, 1997, and on file with the Department of Planning and Development of the City Of Miami, Florida, shall be relied upon generally for administrative interpretations and is made a part hereof by reference. Section 7. This Major Use Special Permit will expire two (2) years from its effective date which is thirty (30) days after the adoption of the herein Resolution. Section 8. The City Manager is hereby directed to instruct the Director of the Department of Planning and Development to transmit a copy of this Resolution and attachment to the developers: Terremark Brickell II, Ltd., a Florida Limited Partnership, 2601 South Bayshore Drive, Penthouse B, Miami, Fl. 33133. Section 9. The Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law are made with respect to the Project as described in the Development Order for the Terremark Brickell II Project, which is attached hereto as Exhibit "B" and made a part hereof by reference. Section 10. The Major Use Special Permit Development Order for the Terremark Brickell II Project (Exhibit "B") is hereby granted and issued. Section 11. In the event that any portion or section of this Resolution or the Development Order (Exhibit "B") is -6- 08- 103 determined to be invalid, illegal, or unconstitutional by a court or agency of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall in no manner affect the remaining portions of this Resolution or Development Order (Exhibit "B") which shall remain in full force and effect. Section 12. This Resolution shall become effective thirty (30) days after its adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 27th day of January , 1998. ATTEST: XAVIER L. SUAREZ, MAYOR In accordance with Miami Code Sec. 2-36, since the Mayor did not indicate approval of this legislation by signing it in the designated place provided, said legislation now becomes effective with the elapse of ten (10) days from the date of Commission action regarding same, without the Mayor exercising "etof _ /---\ —11-9 Wafter J.(6c6mW City Clerk WALTER J. FOEMAN, CITY CLERK PREPARED AND APPROVED BY: GEORGE K. S N II ASSISTANT CITY ATTORN APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: L EDWARD SWELL I ERIM CITY TTORNEY W2176:GKW:BSS -7- 98— 103 24912 A ,71 Lots 1 through 23, inclusive, Block 1, together with those alleys located within said Block 1, AMENDED PLAT OF POINT VIEW, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 2 at Page 93 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. Said land lying and being in the City of Miami, Florida. 98- 103 EXHIBIT "B" DEVELOPMENT ORDER ATTACHMENT TO RESOLUTION NO. DATE: TERREMARK BRICKELL II PROJECT MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT DEVELOPMENT ORDER Let it be known that pursuant to Articles 13 and 17 of Ordinance No. 11000, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended, the Commission of the City of Miami, Florida, has considered in a public hearing, the issuance of a Major Use Special Permit for the Terremark Brickell II Project (hereinafter referred to as the "PROJECT") to be located at approximately 1435 Brickell Avenue, Miami, Florida; see legal description on "Exhibit All, attached hereto and made a part hereof; said legal description is subject to any dedications, limitations, restrictions, reservations or easements of record. After due consideration of the recommendations of the Zoning Board and Planning Advisory Board and after due consideration of the consistency of this proposed development with the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan, the City Commission has approved the PROJECT, and subject to the following conditions approves the major Use Special Permit and hereby issues this Permit: 98- 103 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The proposed Terremark Brickell II Project is a mixed use development located at approximately 1435 Brickell Avenue, Miami, Florida; ("PROJECT"). The PROJECT is located on approximately 5.11 gross acres and 3.74 net acres of land (more specifically described on "Exhibit All, incorporated herein by reference). The remainder of the PROJECT's VITAL DATA is attached hereto as "EXHIBIT C", and incorporated herein by reference. The proposed PROJECT will consist of 372,799 square feet of office space, 246 hotel rooms, and 40 residential units with 28,824 square feet of accessory commercial space and 963 parking spaces. The building will consist of a single 38 story tower; it will also contain a recreation deck of approximately 63,290 sq.ft. of outdoor space which includes racquetball, tennis, basketball, running track, lap pool, jacuzzi and an outdoor cafe. The ownership, operation and maintenance of common areas and facilities will be by the property owner or a mandatory property owner association in perpetuity pursuant to a recorded Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions. -2- 98- 103 The Major Use Special Permit Application for the Terremark Brickell II Project has a companion application for Special Exceptions as follows: Special Exception with City Commission approval, per Article 6, Section 605.4.3 (1) to allow a drive-thru facility for a financial institution; Special Exception with City Commission approval, per Article 9 for a drive-thru facility that does not meet the minimum stacking requirements: Reel ' r d* Provi dpri* Lane 1 10 4 Lane 2 8 5 *: Stacking spaces before the Service window. Special Exception per Article 6, Section 605.4.3 (2) to allow a Bar/lounge within the SD-5 district; The Major Use Special Permit Application for the Terremark Brickell II Project also encompasses the following lower ranking Special Permits: CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT per Article 9, Section 915.2 for a Federal Aviation Authority clearance letter; CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT per Article 9, Section 917.1.2 for Valet Service; CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT per Article 9, Section 906.9 for Pool/Outdoor Recreational Area; CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT per Article 9, Section 923.4 for replacement of one (1) 12x35 loading berth with two (2) 10x35 loading berths; -3- 98- 103 CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 6, Section 605.3., for new construction in the SD-5 Zoning District; CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 908.2. for access from a public street with widths greater than 25 feet; CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 6, Section 605.5 (2), for outdoor service of food/drink/shelter; Pursuant to Articles 13 and 17 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, approval of the requested Major Use Special Permit shall be considered sufficient for the subordinate permits and referenced above. The Project shall be constructed substantially in accordance with plans and design schematics, including the landscape plan, on file prepared by Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, dated October 1997; said design and landscape plans may be permitted to be modified only to the extent necessary to comply with the conditions for approval imposed herein; all modifications shall be subject to the review and approval of the Director of the Department of Planning and Development prior to the issuance of any building permits. The PROJECT conforms to the requirements of the SD-5 Zoning Districts, as contained in Ordinance No. 11000, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended. The existing comprehensive plan future land use designation allows the proposed mix and intensity of commercial and residential uses. -4- 98- 103 PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT THE APPLICANT, ITS SUCCESSORS, AND/OR ASSIGNS, JOINTLY OR SEVERALLY, SHALL DO THE FOLLOWING: 1. Meet all applicable building codes, land development regulations, ordinances and other laws. 2. Provide a list of agencies from which approvals and/or permits must be obtained prior to initiation of development and the permit or approval required of each. 3. Allow the Miami Police Department to conduct a security survey, at the option of the Department, and to make recommendations concerning security measures and systems; further submit a report to the Planning Department, prior to commencement of construction, demonstrating how the Police Department recommendations, if any, have been incorporated into the PROJECT security and construction plans, or demonstrate to the Planning Director why such recommendations are impractical. 4. Provide a letter from the Department of Fire -Rescue indicating APPLICANT'S coordination with members of the Fire Plan Review Section at the Department of Fire -Rescue for the review of the scope of the PROJECT, owner responsibility, building development process and review procedures, as well as specific requirements for fire protection and life safety systems, egress, vehicular access and water supply. 5. Provide a letter of assurance from the Solid Waste Department that the PROJECT has addressed all concerns of the said Department. 6. Prepare a Minority Participation and Employment Plan to be submitted to the City's Director of Minority and Women Business Affairs for review and comments, with the understanding that the City's Minority/Women Business 5 98- 103 Affairs and Procurement Ordinance No. 10538 is a guide that the APPLICANT must use its best efforts to follow. 7. Prepare a Minority Contractor/Subcontractor Participation Plan to the City's Director of Minority and Women Business Affairs for review and comment, wit the understanding that the City's Minority/Women Business Affairs and Procurement Ordinance No. 10538 is a guide that the APPLICANT must use its best efforts to follow. 8. Record in the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, a Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions providing that the ownership, operation and maintenance of all common areas and facilities will be by the property owner or a mandatory property owner association in perpetuity. 9. Record a certified copy of the development order with the Clerk of the Dade County Circuit Court specifying that the Development Order runs with the land and is binding on the Applicant, its successors, and signs, jointly or severally. 10. Provide the City with an executed, recordable unity of title or covenant in -lieu of unity of title agreement for the subject property; said agreement shall be subject to the review and approval of the City's Law Department. 11. Provide the Public Works Department of the City of Miami with plans for proposed sidewalk and swale area improvements for their review and approval prior to the issuance of a building permit. 13. Provide the Department of Planning and Development with a temporary parking plan which addresses construction employee parking and temporary parking arrangements for the existing building during the construction period; said plan shall be subject to the review and approval by the Department prior to the issuance of any building permits. 14. The applicant shall work with staff to address the proposed building's capping element in an effort to ensure that the final result is the most complementary to the proposed building. 9°- 103 THE CITY SHALL: 1. Subject to payment of all applicable fees due, establish the effective date of this Permit as being thirty (30) days from the date of its issuance with the issuance date constituting the commencement of the thirty (30) day period to appeal from the provisions of the Permit. The Terremark Brickell II Project, proposed by the applicant, Terremark Brickell II, Ltd., a Florida Limited Partnership, ("Applicant"), complies with the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000, is consistent with the orderly development and goals of the City of Miami, and complies with local land development regulations and further, pursuant to Section 1703 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000: (1) the PROJECT will have a favorable impact on the economy of the City; and (2) the PROJECT will efficiently use public transportation facilities; and (3) the PROJECT will favorably affect the need for people to find adequate housing reasonably accessible to their places of employment; and (4) the PROJECT will efficiently use necessary public facilities; and -7- 9R- 103 (5) the PROJECT will not negatively impact the environment and natural resources of the City; and (6) the PROJECT will not adversely affect public safety ; and (7) the public welfare will be served by the PROJECT; and (8) any potentially adverse effects of the PROJECT will be mitigated through conditions of this Major Use Special Permit. The proposed development does not unreasonably interfere with the achievement of the objectives of the adopted State Land Development Plan applicable to the City of Miami. Pursuant to Section 1305 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, the specific site plan aspects of the PROJECT i.e., ingress and egress, offstreet parking and loading, refuse and service areas, signs and lighting, utilities, drainage and control of potentially adverse effects generally have been considered and will be further considered administratively during the process of issuing individual building permits and certificates of occupancy. `�R_ 103 PLANNING FACT SHEET PZ-3 APPLICANT Terremark Brickell II, Ltd. HEARING DATE December 17, 1997. REQUEST/LOCATION Consideration of a Major Use Special Permit for the property located at approximately 1435 Brickell Avenue. LEGAL DESCRIPTION Complete legal description on file with the Hearing Boards Office. PETITION Consideration of. a Major Use Special Permit for the Terremark Brickell II Project at approximately 1435 Brickell Avenue to allow a multi -use structure consisting of: a hotel component, with 246 guest rooms; a residential component, with 40 apartment units; an office component, with 372,799 square feet, a retail component, with 18,822 square feet and a parking structure component, with 963 parking spaces. PLANNING Approval with conditions. RECOMMENDATION BACKGROUND AND Please see attached analysis and recommendation. ANALYSIS PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD CITY COMMISSION N/A Approval with conditions APPLICATION NUMBER 97-054 VOTE: 5-0 Item #2 . W ............................ CITY OF MIAMI • DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT 444 SW 2ND AVENUE, 31tD FLOOR • MIAMI, FLORIDA, 33130 PHONE (305) 416-1435 ...................................................................................................................................................................................... ate: 01/15/98••.............................o��o" 9�- 103 RESOLUTION PAB - 76-97 A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL, OF A MAJOR USE. SPECIAL PERMIT FOR THE TERREMARK BRICKELL II PROJECT LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY 1435 BRICKELL AVENUE TO ALLOW A MULTI -USE STRUCTURE CONSISTING OF: A HOTEL COMPONENT, WITH 246 GUEST ROOMS; A RESIDENTIAL COMPONENT, WITH 40 APARTMENT UNITS; AN OFFICE COMPONENT, WITH 372,799 SQUARE FEET, A RETAIL COMPONENT, WITH 18,822 SQUARE FEET AND A PARKING STRUCTURE COMPONENT, WITH 963 PARKING SPACES. SUBJECT TO THE DELETION OF CONDITION NO. EIGHT (8). HEARING DATE: December 17, 1997 ITEM NO. 3 VOTE: 5-0 ATTEST:, Plfllllll" Odes Slazyk, Assistant or Department of Planning and Development 9 -� 103 ANALYSIS FOR MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT Terremark Brickell H CASE NO: 97-054 The requested Major Use Special Permit is for the purpose of allowing a Mixed Use Development project consisting of 372,799 square feet of office space, 246 hotel rooms, and 40 residential units with accessory commercial space and 963 parking spaces for the property located at approximately 1435 Brickell Avenue within the Brickell area (see attached legal description, location maps and aerial photographs for exact property boundaries). In determining the appropriateness of the proposed mixed use project, the Department Development, Building and Zoning has referred this project to the Large Scale Development Committee (LSDC) and the Urban Development Review Board (UDRB) for additional input and recommendations; the following findings have been made: • It is found that the proposed mixed use development project will benefit the Downtown District by creating new office space, hotel rooms and housing opportunities for residents and employees of the area. • It is found that the Urban Development Review Board (UDRB) has recommended approval of the proposed project as specified on the attached minutes from its public meeting held on November 13, 1997. • It is found that the Large Scale Development Committee (LSDC) met on October 6, 1997 and has reviewed the project for compliance with technical concerns and has recommended the following: 1. pursuant to the Department of Public Works, the project requires plans for proposed sidewalk and swale area improvements prior to the issuance of a building permit; and 2. pursuant to the Downtown NET Office, the applicant shall submit a parking plan for construction employees and temporary parking arrangements for the existing building while the new building is under construction; said parking plan shall be subject to the review and approval by the Department of Development, Building and Zoning prior to the issuance of any building permits. • It is found that the Department of Development, Building and Zoning is in concurrence with the findings of the LSDC and will require compliance with the above referenced conditions prior to the issuance of any building permits for the proposed project. • It is found that with respect to all additional criteria as specified in Section 1305 of Zoning Ordinance 11000, the proposal has been reviewed and found to be adequate. Based on these findings, the Department of Development, Building and Zoning is recommending approval of the requested Mixed Use Development Project with the following conditions: 1. The approval of this Major Use Special Permit shall be subject to the recordation of the following documents prior to the issuance of any building permits for the proposed project: a. Unity of Title or covenant in lieu thereof providing that the ownership, operation and maintenance of all common areas and facilities will be by the property owner or a mandatory property owner association in perpetuity. b. Development Order specifying that the Development Order runs with the land and is binding on the Applicant, it successors and assigns, jointly or severally. 2. Pursuant to the Downtown NET Office, the applicant shall submit a parking plan for construction employees and temporary parking arrangements for the existing building while the new building is under construction; said parking plan shall be subject to review and approval by the Department of Development, Building and Zoning prior to the issuance of any building permits. 3. Pursuant to the Department of Public Works, the project requires plans for proposed sidewalk and swale area improvements prior to the issuance of a building permit. 4. The applicant shall work with staff to address the proposed building's capping element in an effort to ensure that the final result is the most complementary to the proposed building. 5. This approval shall also be subject to all additional conditions specified in the attached Development Order. 2 6 98- 103 CITY OF MIAMI URBAN DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Meeting of November 13, 1997 UDRB Report for. BRICKELL TERREMARK 11 Review of Major Use Special Permit proposal for development of 38 story tower containing hotel, residential and office components. Item: 2 of 2 Location: 185 SE I Terrace Applicant: Terremark / Bermello, Ajamil and Partners. Case number. 97-115 Vote: Unanimous (5 to 0) UDRB Resolution: Proposal recommended for approval as presented in plans and supplementary materials submitted by the applicant. Staff Recommendations: Staff recommends that the manner in which the building is presently "capped' be reviewed and revised in a manner to be . approved by staff.. It is thought that the building, albeit elegant and refined, would benefit from a more prominent "feature -like' element This capping element should complement the building so as to facilitate its integration into a context of buildings much less subdued than the subject proposal purports to be. CITY OF MIAMI • DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT, BUILDING AND ZONING 444 SW 2nd Avenue, 3'" Floor • Miami, FI. 33130 1 LET- T S.W. 10 ST Q S '' a 1 r ,� , • • s , . • s I• �' .• S, L� .., x 7S 3 � r•• W s 1�! I. ' V ix r N N 's �. �• 11 N q�74 ca y a ! •1 1 if .. �... S T W. 11 S T a TAr T /.. .. •• �. . • W 4• )1/ : N CITY ..,•,,ram ..,• •�L, 84 SN Y Oq t s N n N 1 .• r. r3 L A.G4gpfl $ 12 ST. 6 x s ,� a 10 S l+ oRT f !i 9 ro ..,..., f, >*y hrRTIf 11 ,a Is . 1• 1• n u SCtMOOE ELEM.—:: a Mu> 12 Q N s, . v. SCHOOL _ « ,•...t•�4f Cs•p fY 1 . 13 •a..rA„ .. ..5 7. S.E. 13 ST •L� .,. • A- 'sup gT pry S1 95 N .. .. 1• IY N M Aj ° _ _ i S.W. 14 St6 It M {�VV i Poore r A •i• : N � • • 1t: V � • „ .. a + r S W. , 14 TERR • V > A"424 O ' • ," S% 49 BE �: • �� • •,•'� • 8. f COSTA Ss- u• • �/� • ' • '•' ` �, ub •s • ,• a a •� �+ � Tr J�� •• O / LEGEND \ ` / M I A M I CITY LIMITS RAILROAOS \ - SPECIAL PUBLIC INTEREST �� V HISTORIC PRESERVATION PEDESTRIAN PATNWMS 103 APPLICATION FOR A MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT File Number MU- - It is intended that major use. special permits be required where specified uses and/or occupancies involve matters deemed to be of citywide or area -wide importance. % The City Commission shall be solely responsible for determinations on applica- tions for major use special permits. (See Article 17) The City Commission shall refer all applications for major use special permits to the Planning Advisory Board and to the Director of the Department of Planning, Building and Zoning for recommendations, and may make referrals to agencies, bodies, or officers, either through the Department of Planning, Building and Zoning or directly for review, analysis, and/or technical findings and determinations and reports thereon. (Section 1301.5.) I, Lucia A. Dougherty , hereby apply to the Director of Planning, Building and Zoning of the City of Miami for approval of a Major Use Special Permit under the provisions of Article 17 of the City of Miami Zoning Ordinance. Address of Property: 1441 Brickell-Avenue Nature of Proposed Use (Be specific): See Addendum to Application for Major Use Special Perait Preliminary Application I attach the following in support or explanation of the Preliminary Applica- tion: 1. Two copies of a survey of the property prepared by a State of Florida Registered Land Surveyor. 2. Affidavi-t 'disclosing ownership of property covered by application and disclosure of interest form (attach Forms 4-83 and 4a-83 to application. 3. Certified list of owners of real estate within a 375-foot radius from the outside boundaries of property covered by this application (attach Form 6-83 to application). 4. Maps of: (a) existing zoning and (b) adopted comprehensive plan designa- tions for areas on and around the property covered by this application. 5. General location map, showing relation to the site or activity to major streets, schools, existing utilities, shopping areas, important physical features in and adjoining the project, ,and the like. 6. Concept Plan (a) Site plan and relevant information. Section 1304.2-a1 (d through h). (b) Relationships to surrounding existing and proposed future uses, and activities, systems and facilities (Section 1702.3..2a). (c) How concept affects existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan principles and designations; tabulation of any required variances, special permits, change of zoning or exemptions (Section 1702.3.2b). 7. Developmental Impact Study (an application for development approval for a Development of Regional Impact may substitute). I 9g_ 103 a APPLICATION FOR A MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT (Continued) 8. Other (Be specific): 9. Fee of $ 45,000 based on Ordinance 10396. Additional fees for any required special permits, changes of zoning, or variances shall be in accord with zoning fees as listed in Section 62-61 of the City Code and Ordinance 10396'. Fee tabulation: Buiiding(s): Other (Specify): Final Application I attach the following the final application: Total: $ 45,000 additional information in support or explanation of Signature Owner di Aut orj el Agent Name: .Aalrl C. 'l-e_?G�ec�'j Address: 1221 Brickell Avenue City, State, Zip: ,Miami, FL 33131 Phone: (305) 579-0603 This application is [ ] approved [ ] denied in accord with City Commission Resolution Number: - Other: 98- 103 15100*1 TERREMARK BRICKELL II ADDENDUM TO APPLICATION FOR MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT OCTOBER 31, 1997 Request for Major Use Special Permit for: a) Develophient of a multi -use office, retail, office and residential tower b) Approval of a parking structure containing 964 spaces. Pursuant to Section 1301 of the Zoning Ordinance, the above referenced Major Use Special Permit is to encompass the following lower ranking special permits: a) Approval of a Special Exemption Permit for the hotel bar to be open to the general public pursuant to Section 605.4.3. b) Approval of a Class H Permit for the reduction in size of the loading berths for the hotel, in order to provide 4 berths 12 ft. x 55 ft. x 15 ft. and two 12 ft. x 35 ft. x 15 ft., wherein a total of five are required, one 12 ft. x 55 ft. x 15 ft. and four 12 ft. x 35 ft. x 15 ft. The Class H is requested pursuant to Section 923. c) Approval of a Class II Permit for new construction as required by Section 605.3.1. d) Approval of a Class II Permit for hotel, retail and office signage. e) Approval of a Class I Permit for a Federal Aviation Authority clearance letter. f) Approval of a class I Permit for valet parking pursuant to Section 917.1.2. g) Approval of a Class I Permit for pools. F:%LANDPLAMTERE\br V\Addendum.doc gg- 103 iq STATE OF FLORIDA) SS. COUNTY OF DADE ) A F F I D A V I T Before me, the undersigned authority, this day personally appeared t.G�'1 -_ ✓C�-1 who being by me first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and says: 1. That he,is the owner, or the legal representative of the owner, submitting the accompanying application for a public hearing as required by Ordinance No. 11000 of the Code of the City of Miami, Florida, effecting the real property located in the City of Miami as described and listed on the pages attached to this affidavit and made apart thereof. 2. That all owners which he represents, if any, have given their full and complete permission for him to act in their behalf for the change or modification of a classification or regulation of zoning as set out in the accompanying petition. 3. That the pages attached hereto and made a part of this affidavit contain the current names, mailing addresses, phone numbers and legal descriptions for the real property which he is the owner or legal representative. 4. The facts as represented in the application and documents submitted 0. in conjunction with this affidavit are true and correct. Further Affiant sayeth not. Sworn to and Subscribed before me this -,72 i day of 7 U=n ZALEz NOTARY STATE OF FLORMA COMMISSION NO. CC403667 9 8 -- 103 MY COMMISSION EXP. SEPT I7,1996 a7 OWNER'S LIST O►mer's Name TEMXkRK BRICKELL II, LTD. i Mailing Address 2601 S. BAYSHORE DRIVE - Penthouse B Telephone Number (305) 856-3200 Legal Descriptign: SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT A Owner's Name Hailing Address Telephone Number Legal Description: 'owner's Name nailing Address Telephone Number Legal Description: My other real estate propwrty owned individually, jointly, or severally (by corporation, partnership or privately) within 375 feet of the subject site is listed as follows: Street Address Legal Description 185 S.E. 14th Terrace Tract "A" of SAINT JAMES OF BRICKELL, Miami, Florida is owned by Terremark•Brickell, LTD. Street Address Plat Book 146, Page 99 of the P.R.D.C. Legal Description Street Address Legal Description 9R 103 �I DISCLOSURE OF owmERSHIP Legal description and street address of subject real property: SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT "A" 1441 Brickell Avenue 2. Owner(s) of subject real property and percentage of ownership. Note: City of Mimi Ordinance No. 9419 requires disclosure of all parties haying a financial interest, either direct or indirect, in the subject Satter of a presentation, request or petition to the City Comiision. Accordingly, question f2 requires disclosure of shareholders of corporations, beneficiaries of trusts, and/or any other interested parties, together with their addresses and proportionate interest. SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT "B" 3. legal description and street address of any real property (a) awned by any party listed in answer to question fZ, and (b) located within 375 felt of the subject real property. Owned by 185 S.E. 14th. Terrace Terremark Brickell, Ltd. Tract "A", SAINT JAMES OF BRICKELL, P_B. 146 at p.99 the P.R.D; C. OWNER OR Ano-0 F R OWNER STATE OF FLORIDA } SS: COUXTY OF DAZE } Adrienne Friesner Pardo ,being duly sworn, deposts and says that he is the wn (Oe r) (Attorney for Owner) of the real property described in ins to question 11, above; that he has read the foregoing answers and that the sage are true and complete; and (if acting as attorney for owner) that he has authority to execute the Disclosure of Ownership form on behalf of the owner. -0,41 J-1 —a44-1n___(SEAL) (Na.e SWOriH TO AND SUBSCRIBED hefo►r at this day of . 19 97. � tauj Plibiic, State of Floj da t argi M f COW I SS I ON EXPIRES: Emyccoomml CIAL NOTARY SEAL RISOL R GONZALEZ UBLIC STATE OF'FLORIDA ISSION NO. CC403667 MLSSION EXP. SEPT 17,1996 103 24812 EXHIBIT "A" Lots 1 through 23, inclusive, Block 1, together with those alleys located within said Block 1, AMENDED PLAT OF POINT VIEW, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 2 at Page 93 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. Said land lying and being in the City of Miami, Florida. yR— 103 a5 EXHIBIT "B" TERREMARK BRICKELL II, LTD., A FLORIDA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP WHICH IS OWNED BY: 1. GENERAL PARTNER - TERREMARK BRICKELL ll, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION (WHICH IS OWNED 100% BY MANUEL D. MEDINA), AND 2. LIMITED PARTNER - TERREMARK-INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION (WHICH IS WHOLLY OWNED BY TERREMARK INVESTMENT SERVICES, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION WHOSE, SHAREHOLDERS ARE: 1 MANUEL D. MEDINA - 51 %, 2) GUEPARD INVESTMENTS 22% (WHICH IS OWNED 100% BY MARIO MORANDINI) AND 3) ALEEDA CORPORTATION - 26% (WHICH IS OWNED 100% BY LAURA PESCISELTRI). MUIMVPARDoA=209&jwm_01 I. 0w24/97 9g- 103 Zl 17701"t 18 3- 4 SPECIAL WARR.aNTY DEED This Instrument Prepared by: Elaine M. Cohen, Esq. HUGHES HUBBAR.D & REED LLP 201 S. Biscayne Boulevard Suite 2500 Miami, Florida 33131. Property Appraisers Parcel Identification (Folio) Numbers: See Exhibit "C" attached hereto Grantee S.S. #: 65-0733631 9 7 R2973'24 1997 JUL 03 16:06 DOCSTPDEE 55,500.00 SURTX 41r625.00 HARVEY RUVIN, CLERK DADE COUNTY, FL This Special Warranty Deed made as of the 1st day of July, .1997 by BRICKELL HOLDING CORP:, a Delaware corporation, hereinafter called the grantor, to TERREMARK BRICKELL II, LTD., a Florida limited partnership, who;e post office is 2601 South Bayshore Drive, Suite 1600, Miami, Florida 33133 hereinafter called the grantee: (Wherever used herein the terms "grantor" and "grantee" include all the parties to this instrument and the heirs, legal representatives and assigns of individuals, and the successors and assigns of corporations). WITNESSETH: That the grantor for and in consideration of the sum of $10.00 and other valuable considerations, receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, hereby grants, bargains, sells, aliens, remises, releases, conveys and confirms unto the grantee all that certain land situate in Dade County, State of Florida, as described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto (the "Property"). Subject to those matters set forth on Exhibit "B" attached hereto. Together, with all the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining. To Have and to Hold, the same in fee simple forever. MI970550.006 98- �R 103 C. 17701tP'I8�5 And the grantor hereby covenants with said grantee that the grantor is lawfully seized of said land in fee simple; that the grantor has good right and lawful authority to sell and convey said land, and hereby warrants the title to said land and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons claiming by, through or under the said grantor. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said corporation has caused these presents to be executed in its name by its proper officer thereunto duly authorized, the day and year first above written. Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of- Wi6iess Signature k'34(1.L H • UPrtK1M6?, Printed Name Witnes ignature 61 S rn) 1yVV S uAvr Printed Name BRICKELL HOLDING CORP., a Delaware corporation M N�aAe: I. Arnesen Ti e: Vice President Address: 380 Madison Avenue, 9th Floor New York, New York 10017 2 *5D MI970550.006 08- 103 1770118"8 STATE OF NEW YORK ) ) SS: COUNTY OF NEW YORK ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 422�'day of i3a_h r, , 1997 by Dwight I. Amesen, Vice President of BRICKELL HOLDING CORP., a Delaware corporation, on behalf of the corporation. He is personally known to me c (Signature of per's n taking ``��ti111311IfIII#r,� (Name of acknowled d stain d� (N er 8 typed, tA�Rfi�&� Qdt Pe ) !Notary Public. State of New York ' . , d► t ' `'� { No. 31 4888037 ? ON Qualified in Kin •.�'�r• (Title or rank) erm Lvires March 30. 19 ' •••:.:.:•••:�� . Serial number, if any 3 MI970550.006 93- 103 �I 177011837 EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lots 1 through 23, inclusive, Block 1, Amended Plat of Pointview, according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 2, at Page 93, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, also described as Lots 1 through 23, inclusive, Block 1, Pointview, according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 2, at Page 25, of the PublicRecords of Dade County, Florida. MI970550.006 Q 103 EXHIBIT "B" LIST OF PERMITTED EXCEPTIONS (a) Zoning and building regulations, restrictions and ordinances now or hereafter adopted or imposed by any governmental body having jurisdiction over the Property or any part thereof; (b) Property taxes, water charges and sewer rents for the year 1997 and subsequent years, and certified, confirmed or ratified assessment liens and pending assessments, if any; (c) Public utility declarations, easements and agreements or record and rights of utility companies to use and maintain pipes, drains, mains, wires, cables, terminal boxes, lines, service connections and facilities, located in, on, over and/or under the Property; (d) Easements or claims of easements not shown by the public records, boundary line disputes, overlaps, encroachments, and any state of facts an accurate current survey or physical inspection of the Property would show; way of record; (e) Covenants, restrictions, licenses, easements, rights, agreements and rights-of- (f) The rights of all tenants and other occupants of the Property; (g) All notes or notices of violations of law, regulations, or municipal ordinances, orders or requirements against or affecting the Property noted in or issued by any Federal, State, County, Municipal or other local departments or other governmental or quasi -governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the Property or any part thereof; (h) Encroachment of stoops, areas, cellar steps, trims and cornices, if any, upon any street or highway or adjoining premises, variations between record line and fences, hedges and retaining walls, and any encroachments of adjoining premises upon the Property; (i) Variations among the description of the Property herein, the description of the Property in any current survey, and the tax map description of the Property; 0) Easement granted to Florida Power and Light Company, recorded in Official Records Book 14290, at Page 1406, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. (k) Resolution No. R-987-89, dated September 12, 1989, recorded in Official Records Book 14259, at Page 2399, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. (1) Resolution No. R-697-90, dated July 10, 1990, recorded in Official Records Book 14646, at page 2513, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. 98- 103 -55 7701 (8?q EXHIBIT "C" LIST OF FOLIO NUMBERS Folio Nos. Lot. No. 01-0210-050-2010 1 01-0210-050-2020 2 01-0210-050-2030 3 01-0210-050-2040 4,5 & 6 01-0210-050-2070 7 01-0210-050-2080 8 01-0210-050-2090 9 01-0210-050-2100 10 01-0210-050-2110 11 & 12 01-0210-050-2120 13 01-0210-050-2130 14 01-0210-050-2140 15 01-0210-050-2150 16 01-0210-050-2160 17 01-0210-050-2170 18 01-0210-050-2180 19 01-0210-050-2190 20 & 21 01-0210-050-2191 22 & 23 pFyDEcovNr• .uwrak. EtECORO yERrteE� lim,v�Y RUVIN^L.c- CtERx ;,, 'v MI970550.006 n -1 ( `3 ZONING FACT SHEET Case Number: 1997-0076 15-Dec-97 Item No: 9 Location: Legal: Applicant: Zoning: Approximately 1435 Brickell Avenue (Complete legal description on file with the Office of Hearing Boards) Terremark Brickell II 1221 Brickell Avenue Lucia A. Dougherty, Esq. 1221 Brickell Avenue Miami, FL Miami, FL App. Ph: (305) 579-0583 Rep. Ph: (305) 579-0583 ext Rep. Fa (__) = ext SD-5 Brickell Avenue Area Residential -Office District Request: Special Exception as part of a Major Use Special Pe mit for the Terremark Project, listed in Ordinance No. 11000, as amended, the Zoning Ordinance of the City Af Miami, Article 6, Section 605.4.3 (1) for a drive-thru facility for a financial institution and a Special Exception requiring City Commission approval per Article 9, Section 931.2(a) Requirements for resevoir spaces, to allow a drive-thru for a financial institution with a reduction of said spaces. Required (1st lane): 10 spaces before the service window. Proposed: 4 spaces before the service window. Required (2nd lane): 8 spaces before the service window. Proposed: 5 spaces before the service window and a Special Exception per Article 6, Section 605.4.3(2) for a Bar/Lounge. Recommendations: Planning and Development: Approval with conditions Public Works: Building site is currently being replatted. Plat and Street Committee: Building site is currenly being replatted. Dade County Transportation: No comments. Enforcement History, If any C.E.B. Case No: N/A Last Hearing Date: Found: N/A Violation(s) Cited: N/A Ticketing Action: N/A Daily Fine: $0.00 Affidavit Non -Compliance Issued on: Warning Letter sent on: Total Fines to Date: $0.00 Lien Recorded on: Comply Order by: CEB Action: 98- 103 log ZONING FACT SHEET Case Number: 1997-0076 15-Dec-97 Item No: 9 History: Analysis: Please see attached. Zoning Board Resolution No: ZB 136-97 Zoning Board: Recommended approval with conditions Vote: 9-0 Appellant: N/A )q D 98- 103 Mr. Henry Crespo offered the following Resolution and moved its adoption. RESOLUTION ZB 136-97 AFTER CONSIDERING THE FACTORS SET FORTH IN SECTION 1305 OF ORDINANCE NO. 11000, AS AMENDED, THE ZONING BOARD RECOMMENDED APPROVAL TO THE CITY COMMISSION FOR THE SPECIAL EXCEPTION AS PART OF A MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT FOR THE TERREMARK PROJECT, LISTED IN ORDINANCE NO. 11000, AS AMENDED, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIANII, ARTICLE 6, SECTION 605.4.3 (1) FOR A DRIVE-THRU FACILITY FOR A FINANCIAL INSTITUTION AND A SPECIAL EXCEPTION REQUIRING CITY COMMISSION APPROVAL PER ARTICLE 9, SECTION 931.2 (a), REQUIREMENTS FOR RESERVOIR SPACES, TO ALLOW A DRIVE-THRU FOR A FINANCIAL INSTITUTION WITH A REDUCTION OF SAID SPACES. REQUIRED (1ST LANE): 10 SPACES BEFORE THE SERVICE WINDOW, PROPOSED: 4 SPACES BEFORE THE SERVICE WINDOW, REQUIRED (2ND LANE): 8 SPACES BEFORE THE SERVICE WINDOW, PROPOSED: 5 SPACES BEFORE THE SERVICE WINDOW AND A SPECIAL EXCEPTION PER ARTICLE 6, SECTION 605.4.3(2) FOR A BAR/LOUNGE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY 1435 BRICKELL AVENUE LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS EXHIBIT "A"; ZONED SD-5 BRICKELL AVENUE AREA RESIDENTIAL -OFFICE DISTRICT. THESE SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS WERE RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL TO THE CITY COMMISSION WITH A TIME LIMITATION OF TWO (2) YEARS IN WHICH A BUILDING PERMIT MUST BE OBTAINED AND THEY ARE SUBJECT TO THE ATTACHED CONDITIONS IN EXHIBIT `B". Upon being seconded by Ms. Ileana Hernandez the motion was passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: Mses. Basila, Cuervo, Hernandez & Morales Messrs. Barket, Crespo, Gibbs, Obregon & Moran-Ribeaux NAYES: None AB SENT: None Ms. Fernandez: Motion carries 9-0 l Teresita L. Fernandez, Chief Office of Hearing Boards December 15, 1997 - Item #9 Zoning Board yR— 103 41 Lots 1 through 23, inclusive, Block 1, together with those alleys located within said Block 1, AMENDED PLAT OF POINT VIEW, according to the plat thereof as recorded -in Plat Book 2 at Page 93 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. , Said land lying and being in the City of Miami, Florida. 9g- 103 T ^112 J E X/t/ 8 /T 406 1. The approval of this Major Use Special Permit shall be subject to the recordation of the following documents prior to the issuance of any building permits for the proposed project: a. Unity of Title or covenant in lieu thereof providing that the ownership, operation and maintenance of all common areas and facilities will be by the property owner or a mandatory property owner association in perpetuity. b. Development Order specifying that the Development Order runs with the land and is binding on the Applicant, it successors and assigns, jointly or severally. 2. Pursuant to the Downtown NET Office, the applicant shall submit a parking plan for construction employees and temporary parking arrangements for the existing building while the new building is under construction; said parking plan shall be subject to review and approval by the Department of Development, Building and Zoning prior to the issuance of any building permits. 3. Pursuant to the Department of Public Works, the project requires plans for proposed sidewalk and swale area improvements prior to the issuance of a building permit. 4. The applicant shall work with staff to address the proposed building's capping element in an effort to ensure that the final result is the most complementary to the proposed building. 5. This approval shall also be subject to all additional conditions specified in the attached Development Order. 9S- 103 AJ5 ZONING BOARD ACTION ON PETITION FOR VARIANCE `ION: I move tha =q on agenda item �_ be (denied) ante i__ that the requirements of r - Section 1903. (were) (were not) satisfied• by relevant evidence in the record of the public hearing. a) as stated in the City's finds of fact, or b) as demonstrated by the petitioner, or on the basis of the following: ---------------------------------------------------------------- The Zoning Board shall make findings that all of the requirements and standards of Section 1903.1 (have been) (have not been) demonstrtated. CHECK ONE a) Special conditions and circumstances (exist) (do or EACH not exist) which are peculiar to the land, STATKl structure or building involved and which are not applicable to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same zoning district. 1) as stated in the City's findings of fact 2) as demonstrated by the petitioner 3) as otherwise stated below: b) The special conditions and '�*ircumstancee (do) (do not) result from the actions of the petitioner: 1) as stated in the City's findings of fact 2) as demonstrated by the petitioner _ 3) as otherwise stated below: c) Literal interpretation of the provisions of the zoning ordinance (would) (would not) deprive the. applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other' properties in the same zoning district under the terms of the zoning ordinance and. work unnecessary and undue hardships on the petitioner: 1) as stated ih the City's findings of fact 2) as demonstrated by the petitioner _ 3) as otherwise stated below: 98- 103 47 d) Granting the variance requested (will) (will lot) convey the same treatment to the individual owner as to the o r of other lands, buildings, or structures in same zoning district. 1) as stated in the City's findings of fagt 2) as demonstrated by the petitioner 3) as otherwise stated below e) Granting the variance requested (will) (will not) convey the same treatment, any special privilege that is denied by the zoning ordinance to other lands, buildings or structures in the same zoning district. f) if granted the variance (will be) (will not be) in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the zoning ordinance, and will not be injurious to.the neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare: 1) as stated in the City's findings of fact _ 2) -as demonstrated by the petitioner _ 3) as otherwise stated below: s at Date Item 0 ,-T I�(y yu- 103 D ANALYSIS FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTION component of MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT CASE NO. 1997-0076 Pursuant to Ordinance 11000, as amended, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, the subject proposal has been reviewed to allow the following Special Exceptions as a component of a Major Use Special Permit: • Special Exception with City Commission approval, per Article 6, Section 605.4.3 (1) to allow a drive-thru facility for a financial institution; • Special Exception with City Commission approval, per Article 9 for a drive-thru facility that does not meet the minimum stacking requirements: Required* Provided* Lane 1 10 4 Lane 2 8 5 *: Stacking spaces before the Service window. • Special Exception per Article 6, Section 605.4.3 (2) to allow a Bar/lounge within the SD-5 district; The requested Major Use Special Permit is for the purpose of allowing a Mixed Use Development project consisting of 372,799 square feet of office space, 246 hotel rooms, and 40 residential units with accessory commercial space and 963 parking spaces for the property located at approximately 1435 Brickell Avenue within the Brickell area (see attached legal description, location maps and aerial photographs for exact property boundaries). The following findings have been made: • It is found that the proposed mixed use development project will benefit the Downtown District by creating new office space, hotel rooms and housing opportunities for residents and employees of the area. 98- 103 All • It is found that the Urban Development Review Board (UDRB) has recommended approval of the proposed project as specified on the attached minutes from its public meeting held on November 13, 1997. • It is found that the Large Scale Development Committee (LSDC) met on October 6, 1997 and has reviewed the project for compliance with technical concerns and has recommended the following: I. pursuant to the Department of Public Works, the project requires plans for proposed sidewalk and swale area improvements prior to the issuance of a building permit; and 2. pursuant to the Downtown NET Office, the applicant shall submit a parking plan for construction employees and temporary parking arrangements for the existing building while the new building is under construction; said parking plan shall be subject to the review and approval by the Department of Development, Building and Zoning prior to the issuance of any building permits. • It is found that the Department of Development, Building and Zoning is in concurrence with the findings of the LSDC and will require compliance with the above referenced conditions prior to the issuance of any building permits for the proposed project. • It is found that with respect to all additional criteria as specified in Section 1305 of Zoning Ordinance 11000, the proposal has been reviewed and found to be adequate. Based on these findings, the Department of Development, Building and Zoning is recommending approval of the requested Mixed Use Development Project with the following conditions: 1. The approval of this Major Use . Special Permit shall be subject to the recordation of the following documents prior to the issuance of any building permits for the proposed project: a. Unity of Title or covenant in lieu thereof providing that the ownership, operation and maintenance of all common areas and facilities will be by the property owner or a mandatory property owner association in perpetuity. b. Development Order specifying that the Development Order runs with the land and is binding on the Applicant, it successors and assigns, jointly or severally. 5/1 98- 103 2. Pursuant to the Downtown NET Office, the applicant shall submit a parking plan for construction employees and temporary parking arrangements for the existing building while the new building is under construction; said parking plan shall be subject to review and approval by the Department of Development, Building and Zoning prior to the issuance of any building permits. 3. Pursuant to the Department of Public Works, the project requires plans for proposed sidewalk and swale area improvements prior to the issuance of a building permit. 4. The applicant shall work with staff to address the .proposed building's capping element in an effort to ensure that the final result is the most complementary to the proposed building. 5. This approval shall also be subject to all additional conditions specified in the attached Development Order. i W. .0 ST Q $ \o° 74 3 r • o o° C t IOa o ' t,• Q o �• • � .• s a r o _ ° r.c ee o W. I I S T 3 e e SS41o re= >° o T C` 1 • W Rq� .4- 8 / i. 24 ), epO ° e r,• : :z :s N y0 CARDED o° (jj'; ., ST B r44Cr • ¢ 1,11 , 8 o fj ••) GISH, t s o o fM f IGO o° "+E FORT ° '1 ; 99 S. E. R A. PR f, s 1 EM Sk51H O O LJ2 rw �• w Svl$ �E O �y� 4� Co _4 �—$ T.o S.E. 13 ST. L� `;�~A"a rus ST I ; . . 9S : Q y► TRACr_AON a ss n u I to 100 f o I 14 .° .. S T. r t V CIP rr,• "9 F =t c .c•a• PPS. O� r►.� N y o x :::.11:. O loc • P c , ,• OW COSTA Bl y '� 's, � • • • �� ,• lJg. E ELI.A ,o > 1p sus - Tr W c �•ti 1�,• • • SOJ LEGEND / MIAMI CITY LIMITS `\ RAI.LRCIA DS SPECIAL PU13UC INTEREST HISTORIC PRESERVATION �••�•.... _P PEDESTRIAN PATHWAYS 0$- 103 15,3 ��\ /� ` 41% 98- 103 55 CITY OF MIAMI URBAN DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Meeting of November 13, 1997 UDRB Report for: BRICKELL TERREMARK II Review of Major Use Special Permit proposal for development of 38 story tower containing hotel, residential and office components. Item: 2 of 2 Location: 185 SE 14" Terrace Applicant: Terremark / Bermello, Ajamil and Partners. Case number: 97-115 Vote: Unanimous (5 to 0) UDRB Resolution: Proposal recommended for approval as presented in plans and supplementary materials submitted by the applicant. Staff Recommendations: Staff recommends that the manner in which the building is presently "capped" be reviewed and revised in a manner to be approved by staff. It is thought that the building, albeit elegant and refined, would benefit from a more prominent "feature -like" element. This capping element should complement the building so as to facilitate its integration into a context of buildings much less subdued than the subject proposal purports to be. CITY OF MIAMI - DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT, BUILDING AND ZONING 444 SW 2' Avenue, 3'd Floor • Miami, FI. 33130 ss- 103 57 Angela George ! LFIQ] I T Y O F M I A M I ARPS PROPERTY SYSTEM LIEN INQUIRY BY FOLIO / ADDRESS (15) PAGE NO: !0001] FOLIO [021005021101 ADDRESS [1441] [ j [BRICKELL LEGAL: 1) POINT VIEW SUB 2) LOT 11 & 12 3) LOT SIZE IRREGULAR LIEN NO TYPE STATUS [AV ] UNIT [ ] PB 2-93 4) OR 17701-1834 0797 2 (18) BLK 1 5) DATE COMP / ACCTNO FRONTAGE COST/AMT DUE SELECT ACTION: 1-INQ NO MORE RECORDS Window ARPSWIN/1 at PRODUCTION Date: 11/18/97 Time: 12:54:40PM ENTER ACTION [1 j XMIT [ ] 9 6 Pg=1 FORM RCV LTAI -- 9., 103 59 TERREMARK BRICKELL II MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT Prepared by: BERMELLO, AJAMIL & PARTNERS, INC. GREENBERG TRAURIG ATTORNEYS AT LAW SHARPTON, BRUNSON & COMPANY, P.A. OCTOBER 31, 1997 A DEVELOPMENT OF TERREMARK BRICKELL II, LTD 9s- 103 i •9.�i I Jr .r- I :l Now SE 14TH Forte It 1 Plaza Fortune W House �RgeE Proposed Site m SE 74rH:LAIVE Brickell Tower S► !, • % u 1s'' Ifk 1 — .., -: 'Loca� . . sK ETQ-'H"�� cat Epp. TERREMARK BRICKELL II MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT Table of Contents Article I. Project Information A. Application for a Major Use Special Permit 1. Development of a multi -use office, retail, hotel and residential tower 2. Approval of a parking structure containing 963 spaces 3. Special Exception Permit for hotel bar 4. Class II Permit for reduction of size of loading docks 5. Class II Permit for new construction 6. Class II Permit for hotel, office and retail signage 7. Class I Permit for Federal Aviation Administration clearance 8. Class I Permit for valet parking 9. Class I Permit for pools B. Disclosure of Ownership C. Ownership Affidavit D. Directory of Project Principals E. Project Data Sheet F. Zoning Atlas Page Article H. Project Description A. Zoning Ordinance No. 11000 l . Section 1304.2.1 Applications Forms; Supplementary Materials 2. Section 1702.2.1 General Report 3. Section 1702.2.2 Major Use Special Permit Concept Plan 4. Section 1702.2.3 Development Impact Study Article III. Supporting Documents Tab 1 Minority Construction Employment Plan Tab 2 Traffic Impact Analysis Tab 3 Site Utility Study Tab 4 Economic Impact Study Tab 5 Survey of Property Tab 6 Drawings TERREMARK BRICKELL II MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT Project Information Article I. Project Information A. Application for a Major Use Special Permit 1. Development of a multi -use office, hotel and residential tower 2. Approval of a parking structure containing 963 spaces 3. Special Exception Permit for hotel bar 4. Class II Permit for reduction of size of loading docks 5. Class II Permit for new construction 6. Class II Permit for hotel, office, and retail signage 7. Class I Permit for Federal Aviation Administration clearance 8. Class I Permit for valet parking for hotel and residential 9. Class I Permit for pool for the hotel and residential B. Disclosure of Ownership C. Ownership Affidavit D. Directory of Project Principals E. Project Data Sheet F. Zoning Atlas Page APPLICATION FOR _ MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT File Number MU- - It is intended that major use special permits be required where specified uses and/or occupancies involve matters deemed to be of citywide or area -wide importance. The City Commission shall be solely responsible for determinations on applica- tions for major use special permits. (See Article 17) The City Commission shall refer all applications for major use special permits to the Planning Advisory Board and to the Director of the Department of Planning, Building and Zoning for recommendations, and may make referrals to agencies, bodies, or officers, either through the Department of Planning, Building and Zoning or directly for review, analysis, and/or technical findings and determinations and reports thereon. (Section 1301.5.) I, Lucia A. Dougherty , hereby apply to the Director of Planning, Building and Zoning of the City of Miami for approval of a Major Use Special Permit under the provisions of Article 17 of the City of Miami Zoning Ordinance. , Address of Property: 1441 Brickell Avenue Nature of Proposed Use (Be specific): _.. See Addendum to Application for Major Use Special Permit Preliminary Application I attach the following in support or explanation of the Preliminary Applica- tion: % 1. Two copies of a survey of the property prepared by a State of Florida Registered Land Surveyor. 2. Affidavi-t 'disclosing ownership of property covered by application and disclosure of interest form (attach Forms 4-83 and 4a-83 to application. 3. Certified list of owners of real estate within a 375-foot radius from the outside boundaries of property covered by this application (attach Form 6-83 to application). 4. Maps of: (a) existing zoning and (b) adopted comprehensive plan designa- tions for areas on and around the property covered by this application. 5. General location map, showing relation to the site or activity to major streets, schools, existing utilities, shopping areas, important physical features in and adjoining the project, and the like. 6. Concept Plan (a) Site plan and relevant information. Section 1304.2,1 (d through h). (b) Relationships to surrounding existing and proposed future uses, and activities, systems and facilities (Section 1702.3-.2a). (c) How concept affects existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan principles and designations; tabulation of any required variances, special permits, change of zoning or exemptions (Section 1702.3.2b). 7. Developmental Impact Study (an application for development approval for a Development of Regional Impact may substitute). APPLICATION FOR A MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT (Continued) 8. Other (Be specific): 9. Fee of $ 45,000 based on Ordinance 10396. Additional fees for any required special permits; changes of zoning, or variances shall be in accord with zoning fees as listed in Section 62-61 of the City Code and Ordinance 10396. Fee tabulation: Building(s): Other (Specify): Total: $ 45,000 Final Application I attach the following additional information in support or explanation of the final application: Signature Owner di Authorized Agent Name: Aly-1 Cvq �-�e5t e� Address: 1221 Brickell Avenue City, State, Zip: ,Miami, FL 33131 Phone: (305) 579-0603 This application is C ] approved [ ] denied in accord with City Commission Resolution Number: - Other: TERREMARK BRICKELL H ADDENDUM TO APPLICATION FOR MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT OCTOBER 31, 1997 Request for Major Use Special Permit for: a) Develophlent of a multi -use office, retail, office and residential tower b) Approval of a parking structure containing 964 spaces. Pursuant to Section 1301 of the Zoning Ordinance, the above referenced Major Use Special Permit is to encompass the following lower ranking special permits: a) Approval of a Special Exemption Permit for the hotel bar to be open to the general public pursuant to Section 605.4.3. b) Approval of a Class II Permit for the reduction in size of the loading berths for the hotel, in order to provide 4 berths 12 ft. x 55 ft. x 15 ft. and two 12 ft. x 35 ft. x 15 ft., wherein a total of five are required, one 12 ft. x 55 ft. x 15 ft. and four 12 ft. x 35 ft. x 15 ft. The Class II is requested pursuant to Section 923.- c) Approval of a Class II Permit for new construction as required by Section 605.3.1. d) Approval of a Class II Permit for hotel, retail and office signage. e) Approval of a Class I Permit for a Federal Aviation Authority clearance letter. f) Approval of a class I Permit for valet parking pursuant to Section 917.1.2. g) Approval of a Class I Permit for pools. F:\LANDPLAN\TERE\brick2\Addeodum.doc DISCLOSURE OF OVRERSHIP Legal description and street address of subject real property: SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT "A" 1441 Brickell Avenue Z. Owner(s) of subject real property and percentage of ownership. }cote: City of Mimes Ordinance No. 9419 requires disclosure of all parties having a financial interest, either direct or indirect, in the subject latter of a presentation, request or petition to the City Comission. Accordingly, question fZ requires disclosure of shareholders of corporations, beneficiaries of trusts, and/or any other interested parties, together with their addresses and proportionate interest. SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT "B" 3. legal description and street address of any real property (a) owned by any party listed in answer to question f2, and (b) located within 375 feet of the subject real property. Owned by Terremark Brickell, Ltd. STATE OF FLORIDA } SS: COtt!M OF CADE } 185 S.E. 14th. Terrace Tract "A", SAINT JAMES OF BRICKELL, P.B. 146 at p.99,6T'�the P.R.D:C. OWNER OR ATtWMEY16k OWNER Adrienne Friesner Pardo , btinq duly sworn, dtpoiti and says that he is the (Owner) (Attorney for O►mr) of the real property dtscribtd in answer to question 11, above; that ht has rind Lhe foregoing answers and that the sage art trot and complete; and (if acting as attorney for owntr) that he hu authority to execute tht Oisclosure of Own trshiq form on behalf of the owner. SWOKN TO AND SUBSCRIBED hefo►r *e this! day of �_, 19 97. MY CCt"ISSION EXPIRES: Od1 -1 -1 4 "� —(SEAL) (wane t �4ota Piblic, State of F10 0 da rE a OFFICIAL NOTARY SEAL MARL90L R GONZALFZ NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF`FLORIDA COMMISSION NO. CC403667 MY COMMISSION EXP. SEPT I7,1996 EXHIBIT "A" Lots 1 through 23, inclusive, Block 1, together with those alleys located within said Block 1, AMENDED PLAT OF POINT VIEW, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 2 at Page 93 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. Said land lying and being in the City of Miami, Florida. 24812 EXHIBIT "B" TERREMARK BRICKELL II, LTD., A FLORIDA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP WHICH IS OWNED BY: 1. GENERAL PARTNER - TERREMARK BRICKELL Ii, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION (WHICH IS OWNED 100% BY MANUEL D. MEDINA), AND 2. LIMITED PARTNER - TERREMARK INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION (WHICH IS WHOLLY OWNED BY TERREMARK INVESTMENT SERVICES, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION WHOSE -SHAREHOLDERS ARE: 1 MANUEL D. MEDINA - 51 %, 2) GUEPARD INVESTMENTS 22% (WHICH IS OWNED 100% BY MARIO MORANDINI) AND 3) ALEEDA CORPORTATION - 26% (WHICH IS OWNED 100% BY LAURA PESCISELTRI). MIAMUPARD0A/882096/$wm 011.00017/24/97 OWNER'S LIST Owner's Name TERREMARK BRICKELL II, LTD. i Mailing Address 2601 S. BAYSHORE DRIVE - Penthouse B Telephone Number (305) 856-3200 Legal Description: SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT A Owner's Name Mailing Address Telephone Number Legal Description - Ws Ham Mailing Address Telephone Number Legal Description: My othtr rtai estate praperty owRted individually, jointly, or severally (by corporation, partnership or privately) within 375 feet of the subject site is listed as foilo%n: Street Address 185 S.E. 14th Terrace Miami, Florida is owned by Terremark Brickell, LTD. Street Address Legal Description Tract "A" of SAINT JAMES OF BRICKELL, Plat Book 146, Page 99 of the P.R.D.C. Legal Description Street Address Legal Description STATE OF FLORIDA) SS. COUNTY OF DADE ) A F F I 0 A v I T Before me, the undersigned authority, this day personally appeared _►.Gr1___ . Pwho being by me first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and says: 1. That he -is the owner, or the legal representative of the owner, submitting the accompanying application for a public hearing as required by Ordinance No. 11000 of the Code of the City of Miami, Florida, effecting the real property located in the City of Miami as described and listed on the pages attached to this affidavit and made apart thereof. 2. That all owners which he represents, if any, have given their full and complete permission for him to act in their behalf for the'change or modification of a classification or regulation of zoning as set out in the accompanying petition. 3. That the pages attached hereto and made a part of this affidavit contain the current names, mailing addresses, phone numbers and legal descriptions for the real property which he is the owner or legal representative. 4. The facts as represented in the application and documents submitted 0. in conjunction with this affidavit are true and correct. Further Affiant sayeth not. Sworn to and Subscribed before me this �J day of LR,�G r 19'1-) 1 in OFFIQlAr,n ZALEZ NOTARY I STATE OF FLORIDA COMMISSION NO. CC403667 MY COMMISSION EXP. SEPT 17,1998 1710I1 18?4 SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED This Instrument Prepared by: Elaine M. Cohen, Esq. HUGHES HUBBARD & REED UP 201 S. Biscayne Boulevard Suite 2500 Miami, Florida 33131. ' Property Appraisers Parcel Identification (Folio) Numbers: See Exhibit "C" attached hereto Grantee S.S. #: 65-0733631 97R297824 1997 JUL 03 16:06 DOCSTPOEE 55,500.00 SURTX 41r625.00 HARVEY RUVIN► CLERK DADE COUNTY, FL This Special Warranty Deed made as of the 1st day of July, 1997 by BRICKELL HOLDING CORP., a Delaware corporation, hereinafter called the grantor, to TERREMARK BRICKELL II, LTD., a Florida limited partnership, who;e post office is 2601 South Bayshore Drive, Suite 1600, Miami, Florida 33133 hereinafter called the grantee: (Wherever used herein the terms "grantor" and "grantee" include all the parties to this instrument and the heirs, legal representatives and assigns of individuals, and the successors and assigns of corporations). WITNESSETH: That the grantor for and in consideration of the sum of S 10.00 and other valuable considerations, receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, hereby grants, bargains, sells, aliens, remises, releases, conveys and confirms unto the grantee all that certain land situate in Dade County, State of Florida, as described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto (the "Property") Subject to those matters set forth on Exhibit "B" attached hereto. Together, with all the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining. To Have and to Hold, the same in fee simple forever. MI970550.006 n C. 17701 1815 And the grantor hereby covenants with said grantee that the grantor is lawfully seized of said land in fee simple; that the grantor has good right and lawful authority to sell and convey said land, and hereby warrants the title to said land and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons 'claiming by, through or under the said grantor. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said corporation has caused these presents to be executed in its name by its proper officer thereunto duly authorized, the day and year first above written. Signed, sealed and delivered BRICKELL HOLDING CORP., a in the presence of: Delaware corporation By: Wi4less Signature e: 'brwight I. Arnesen Ti e: Vice President Address: 380 Madison Avenue, 9th Floor Printed Name New York, New York 10017 Witnes ignature 61 S i rn) IW' SyiyC Printed Name 2 MI970550.006 -7 701 1830 STATE OF NEW YORK ) ) SS: COUNTY OF NEW YORK ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 42�'day of 1997 by Dwight I. Amesen, Vice President of BRICKELL HOLDING CORP., a Delaware corporation, on behalf of the corporation. He is personally known to me (Signature of person taking acknowledgment-Y (Name of acknowledger typed, M �g 24Istamped) Notary Public State of New York, No. 31 4888037 Qualified in Kin (Title or rank) erm hxpires March 30. 19 ..:•••.' Serial number, if any 3 MI970550.006 177011w EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lots 1 through 23, inclusive, Block 1, Amended Plat of Pointview, according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 2, at Page 93, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, also described as Lots 1 through 23, inclusive, Block 1, Pointview, according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 2, at Page 25, of the PublicAecords of Dade County, Florida. MI970550.006 EXHIBIT "B" LIST OF PERMITTED EXCEPTIONS (a) Zoning and building regulations, restrictions and ordinances now or hereafter adopted or imposed by any governmental body having jurisdiction over the Property or any part thereof; (b) Property taxes, water charges and sewer rents for the year 1997 and subsequent years, and certified, confirmed or ratified assessment liens and pending assessments, if any; (c) Public utility declarations, easements and agreements or record and rights of utility companies to use and maintain pipes, drains, mains, wires, cables, terminal boxes, lines, service connections and facilities, located in, on, over and/or under the Property; (d) -Easements or claims of easements not shown by the public records, boundary line disputes, overlaps, encroachments, and any state of facts an accurate current survey or physical inspection of the Property would show; way of record; (e) Covenants, restrictions, licenses, easements, rights, agreements and rights -of - (f) The rights of all tenants and other occupants of the Property, (g) All notes or notices of violations of law, regulations, or municipal ordinances, orders or requirements against or affecting the Property noted in or issued by any Federal, State, County, Municipal or other local departments or other governmental or quasi -governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the Property or any part thereof, (h) Encroachment of stoops, areas, cellar steps, trims and cornices, if any, upon any street or highway or adjoining premises, variations between record line and fences, hedges and retaining walls, and any encroachments of adjoining premises upon the Property; (i) , Variations among the description of the Property herein, the description of the Property in any current survey, and the tax map description of the Property; 0) Easement granted to Florida Power and Light Company, recorded in Official Records Book 14290, at Page 1406, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. (k) Resolution No. R-987-89, dated September 12, 1989, recorded in Official Records Book 14258, at Page 2399, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. (1) Resolution No. R-697-90, dated July 10, 1990, recorded in Official Records Book 14646, at page 2513, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. 7701 18,,q EXHIBIT "C" LIST OF FOLIO NUMBERS Folio Nos. Lot. No. 01-0210-050-2010 1 01-0210-050-2020 2 01-0210-050-2030 3 01-0210-050-2040 4,5 & 6 01-0210-050-2070 7 01-0210-050-2080 8 01-0210-050-2090 9 01-0210-050-2100 10 01-0210-050-2110 11 & 12 01-0210-050-2120 13 01-0210-050-2130 14 01-0210-050-2140 15 01-0210-050-2150 16 01-0210-050-2160 17 01-0210-050-2170 18 01-0210-050-2180 19 01-0210-050-2190 20 & 21 01-0210-050-2191 22 & 23 RECOROEO IN OfFPCL" Of O-DE CmU� -;:LCMCA RECORD VCmlf#EC HARVEy RUV'N^rc_ cam MI970550.006 CONSUELO M. QUINTANA REAL ESTATE DATA RESEARCHER 1111 SW llth Avenue, Miami, FL 33129-1820 OFC # 305-858-2287 FAX # 305-859-2439 JULY 30, 1997 CITY OF MIAMI PLANNING & ZONING BOARD ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT P.O. BOX 330708 MIAMI, FL 33133 RE: PROPERTY OWNERSHIP LIST WITHIN 3751 FT FROM: 125-26, 139, 144, 148-49, 158-59, 169, 180, 187, 190 SE 14TH TERR & 1433-35-39-41 BRICKELL AVENUE MIAMI, FL 33129 (STREET ADDRESS) LOTS 1 THRII 23, TOGETHER WITH THOSE CERTAIN PUBLIC ALLEYS (TO BE ABANDONED) BLOCK 1, AMENDED PLAT OF POINT VIEW PLAT BOOK 2-93 (LEGAL DESCRIPTION) DADE COUNTY FLORIDA. THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE ATTACHED OWNERSHIP LIST, MAP AND MAILING MATRIX IS A COMPLETE AND ACCURATE REPRESENTATION OF THE REAL ESTATE PROPERTY AND PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 375' FEET OF THE -SUBJECT PROPERTY LISTED ABOVE. THIS REFLECTS THE MOST CURRENT RECORDS ON FILE IN THE DADE COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S OFFICE. (23 LABELS) (MIA-2012)(INV-1818) (L-290i,) (23 LABELS) (ORIG ALLY 61 NAMES) BT IERG BRICKELL LTD 2_ .sLHAMBRA CIR #1100 C GABLES FL 33134 BRICKELL HOLDING CORP % CHEMICAL REALTY GROUP 227 PARK AVE NEW YORK NY 10172 COMMODORE BAY CONDO CONDO ASSOC 1402 S BAYSHORE DR MIA FL 33131 BABYLON INT'L INC 180 ISLAND DR KEY BISC FL 33149 KINGSTAR INTL INC & "SEL HECTOR & DAVIS 1 3 BISC BLVD 41ST FL MIAMI FL 33131 BLACKWELL HOLDING INC % STEEL HECTOR & DAVIS 200 S BISC BLVD #41FL MIAMI FL 33131 TERREMARK BRICKELL LTD 2601 S BAYSHORE DR #PH1 MIAMI FL 33133 REPUBLIC INTL BK OF NY 1451 BRICKELL AVE MIAMI FL 33131 HAMPTON PK DEV INC P O BOX 6055 SURFSIDE FL 33154 CITY OF MIAMI 3500 PAN AMERICAN DR MIAMI FL 33135 BRICKELL EAST CONDO ASSC 151 SE 15TH RD MIAMI FL 33129 COSTA BELLA CONDO ASSC 1450 S BAYSHORE DR MIAMI FL 33131 BRICKELL SHORES CONDO CONDO ASSOC 1440 S BAYSHORE DR MIAMI FL 33131 DIOCESE OF NEWTON FOR THE MELKITES IN THE USA INC 1501 BRICKELL AVE MIAMI FL 33129 BAYSHORE CO-OP INC THE PALACE CONDO POINT VIEW APTS CONDO ASC CONDO ASSOC 1430 S BAYSHORE DR 1541 BRICKELL AVE MIA FL 33131 MIAMI FL 33129 BAYSHORE PLACE CONDO ASSC RICHARD OCCONNELL TR 1420 S BAYSHORE DR % TRANSAL CORP MT- FL 33131 2121 SW 3 AVE 8TH FL MIAMI FL 33129 1 BRICKELL INV RLTY CORP % ELENA MOLA 1850 K ST NW WASHINGTON DC 20006 EVERETT V SUGARBAKER 1500 BRICKELL AVE MIAMI FL 33129 PHOENIX INV CO LE REM RICHARD O'CONNELL TR 2121 SW 3 AVE 8FL MIAMI FL 33129 BRICKELL BAY TOWER CONDO THE TAPLIN CO LTD CONDO ASSOC 1177 KANE CONCOURSE 1408 SE BAYSHORE DR BAL HARBOUR FL 33154 MIA Ft. 11111 FORTS PLAZA PB 96-21 TRACT A (L-290) (61 LABELS) TR A 1401 BRICKELL AVE #01-02105-007-010 POINT VIEW SUB, PB 2-93 BLOCK 1 LOT 1 126 SE 14TH TERR LOT 2 158 SE 14TH TERR LOT 3 148 SE 14TH TERR LOTS 4-5-6 144 SE 14TH TERR LOT 7 1425 BRICKELL AVE LOT 8 1433 BRICKELL AVE LOT 9 1435 BRICKELL AVE LOT 10 1439 BRICKELL AVE s 11-12 �:41 BRICKELL AVE I BLUMBERG BRICKSLL LTD 255 ALHAMBRA CIR #1100 C GABLES FL 33134 BRICKELL HOLDING CORP % CHEMICAL REALTY GROUP 227 PARK AVE NEW YORK NY 10172 BRICKELL HOLDING CORP % CHEMICAL REALTY GROUP 227 PARK AVE NEW YORK NY 10172 BRICKELL HOLDING CORP % CHEMICAL REALTY GROUP 227 PARK AVE NEW YORK NY 10172 BRICKELL HOLDING CORP % CHEMICAL REALTY GROUP 227 PARK AVE NEW YORK NY 10172 BRICKELL HOLDING CORP % CHEMICAL REALTY GROUP 277 PARK AVE NEW YORK NY 10172 BRICKSLL HOLDING CORP % CHEMICAL REALTY GROUP 277 PARK AVE NEW YORK NY 10172 BRICKELL HOLDING CORP % CHEMICAL REALTY GROUP 277 PARK AVE NEW YORK NY 10172 BRICKELL HOLDING CORP % CHEMICAL REALTY GROUP 277 PARK AVE NEW YORK NY 10172 BRICKSLL HOLDING CORP % CHEMICAL REALTY GROUP 277 PARK AVE NEW YORK NY 10172 LOT 13 & 14 125 SE 14TH TR LOT 15 139 SE 14TH TR LOT 16 149 SE 14TH TR LOT 17 159 SE 14TH TR LOT 18 169 SE 14TH TR LOT 19 187 SE 14TH TR LOTS 20-21 190 SE 14TH TERR LOTS 22-23 180 SE 14TH TERR BLOCK 2 LOT 4 1402 S BAYSHORE DR 1 , LESS NLY LOFT FOR R/W & S1/2 OUT LOT 5 L)s aS NLY 25FT FOR R/W BK 2 240 99 14TH ST 2 BRICKELL HOLDING CORP % CHEMICAL REALTY GROUP 277 PARR AVE NEW YORK NY 10172 BRICKELL HOLDING CORP % CHEMICAL REALTY GROUP 277 PARK AVE NEW YORK NY 10172 BRICKELL HOLDING CORP % CHEMICAL REALTY GROUP 277 PARK AVE NEW YORK NY 10172 BRICKELL HOLDING CORP % CHEMICAL REALTY GROUP 277 PARK AVE NEW YORK NY 10172 BRICKELL HOLDING CORP % CHEMICAL REALTY GROUP 277 PARK AVE NEW YORK NY 10172 BRICKELL HOLDING CORP % CHEMICAL REALTY GROUP 277 PARK AVE NEW YORK NY 10172 BRICKELL HOLDING CORP % CHEMICAL REALTY GROUP 227 PARK AVE NEW YORK NY 10172 BRICKELL HOLDING CORP % CHEMICAL REALTY GROUP 227 PARK AVE NEW YORK NY 10172 COMMODORE BAY CONDO CONDO ASSOC 1402 S BAYSHORE DR MIA FL 33131 BABYLON INT'L INC 180 ISLAND DR KEY BISC FL 33149 3 ALL LOT 6 & 7 LESS BEG NW COR E50FT SWLY TO ALLY KINGSTAR INTL INC WLY24.5FTNLY TO POB & N25FT OUT LT 5 & STEEL HECTOR & DAVIS 218 SE 14TH ST 200 S BISC BLVD 41ST FL MIAMI FL 33131 BEGIN AT NW COR IT 7 E50FT S TO ALLEY W24.5FT N KINGSTAR INTL INC TO BEG & LT 8 & STEEL HECTOR & DAVIS 194 SE 14TH ST 200 S BISC BLVD #41FL MIAMI FL 33131 LT 9 & B15FT OF LT 10 LESS NLY10FT THEREOF BLACKWELL HOLDING INC FOR R/W % STEEL HECTOR & DAVIS 180 SE 14TH ST 200 S BISC BLVD #41FL MIAMI FL 33131 B40FT LOT 11 & W35FT LT 10 LESS NLY THEREOF BLACKWELL HOLDING INC FOR R/W % STEEL HECTOR & DAVIS I-- SE 14TH ST 200 S BISC BLVD #41FL MIAMI FL 33131 W10FT LT 11 & LT 12 TERREMARK BRICKELL LTD 160 SE 14TH ST 2601 S BAYSHORS DR #PHI MIAMI FL 33133 LOT 13 TERREMARK BRICKELL LTD 152 SE 14TH ST 2601 S BAYSHORE DR #PHI MIAMI FL 33133 LOT 26 TERREMARK BRICKELL LTD 151 SS 14TH TERR 2601 S BAYSHORE DR #PHI MIAMI FL 33133 LOT 27 TERREMARK BRICKELL LTD 157 SE 14TH TERR 2601 S BAYSHORS DR #PHI MIAMI FL 33133 LOT 28 TERR121ARK BRICKELL LTD 165 SE 14TH TERR 2601 S BAYSHORE DR #PHI MIAMI FL 33133 29 & LOT 30 LESS ESFT TERREKARK BRICKELL LTD SE 14TH TERR 2601 S BAYSHORE DR #PHI MIAMI FL 33133 F#01-02105-002-430 F#01-02105-006 S175FT LOT 34 LESS S12FT N OF LOT 35 1430 S BAYSHORE DR S300FT OF N325FT OF LOT 34 LESS SWLY 5FT 1420 S BAYSHORE DR F#01-02105-008 4 BAYSHORE CO-OP INC POINT VIEW APTS CONDO ASSC 1430 S BAYSHORE DR MIA FL 33131 BAYSHORE PLACE CONDO ASSC 1420 S BAYSHORE DR MIA FL 33131 LOTS 1-2-3-31-32-33 & SLY 5FT OF LOT 30 & PORT OF LOT 34 BEG AT NE COR S25FT SWLY TO W/L NBFT TO NW COR NELY TO POB OF LOFT ALLEY LYG S OF BRICKELL BAY TOWER CONDO SLY/L OF LOT 4 EXT W & NLY OF LOT 34W LESS CONDO ASSOC 1408 S BAYSHORE DR 1408 SE BAYSHORE DR F#01-4140-026 MIA FL 33131 LT 45 LESS NSLY 5FT FOR R/W & N1/2 OF LT 46 BR 2 REPUBLIC INTL BK OF NY 1449 BRICKELL AVE 1451 BRICKELL AVE F#0' n2105-002-530 MIAMI FL 33131 OUT OF LOTS 58-59 HAMPTON PK DEV INC VACANT F#01-02105-002-640 P 0 BOX 6055 SURFSIDE FL 33154 OUT LOT FOOT OF BROADWAY CITY OF MIAMI VACANT GOVT 3500 PAN AMERICAN DR F#01-02105-002-660 MIAMI FL 33135 F#01-4139-044-0001 EAST BRICKELL TOWER SUB, PB 117-86 BRICKELL EAST CONDO ASSC TRACT A 151 SE 15TH RD 151 SE 15TH RD MIAMI FL 33129 TRACT B TR B REPUBLIC INTL BK OF NY 1451 BRICKELL AVE 1451 BRICKELL AVE F#01-4139-036-0020 MIAMI FL 33131 F#01-4139-026-0010 COSTA BELLA SUB, TRACT A PB 107-14 TRACT A COSTA BELLA CONDO ASSC 1450 S BAYSHORE DR 1450 S BAYSHORE DR MIAMI FL 33131 BELLA BAHIA SUB. PB 109-13 BRICKELL SHORES CONDO 1 . S BAYSHORE DR CONDO ASSOC F#01-4139-028 1440 S BAYSHORE DR MIAMI FL 33131 5 e it T-ke). --VI : PORT OF ITS 1 THRU 5 & PORT OF LT 39 OF PB 5-44 DESC BEG MOST WLY COR OF IT 39 TH N 52 DEG E 169. 40FT S 57 DEG E 249.92FT S 32 DEG W 83.45FT N 57 DIOCESE OF NEWTON FOR THE DEG W 22 724FT S 52 DEG W 121.773FT N 37 DEG W MELKITES IN THE USA INC 129.038FT S 52 DEG W 52.31FT N 37 DEG W 112.99FT 1501 BRICKELL AVE TO POB MIAMI FL 33129 1501 BRICKELL AVE PORT OF LTS 5 THRU 11 & SW75FT OF LT13 & PORT OF THE PALACE CONDO IT 39 (F#01-4139-038-0001) CONDO ASSOC 1541 BRICKELL AVE 1541 BRICKELL AVE MIAMI FL 33129 MARY BRICKELL ADDN. PB B-113 BLOCK 99 LOTS 1-2 RICHARD OCCONNELL TR 1414 BRICKELL AVE % TRANSAL CORP 2121 SW 3 AVE 8TH FL MIAMI FL 33129 LOTS 3 THRU 7 & N1/2 OF LT 8 THE TAPLIN CO LTD 1A BRICKELL AVE 1177 KANE CONCOURSE BAL HARBOUR FL 33154 LOT 9 & S1/2 OF LOT 8 BRICKELL INV RLTY CORP 1432 BRICKELL AVE % ELENA NOLA 1850 K ST NW WASHINGTON DC 20006 LOT 10 & N1/2 LOT 11 BRICKELL INV RLTY CORP 1438 BRICKELL AVE % ELENA MOLA 1850 K ST NW WASHINGTON DC 20006 SI/2 LOT 11 & LOT 12 BRICKELL INV RLTY CORP 1440 BRICKELL AVE % ELENA NOLA 1850 K ST NW WASHINGTON DC 20006 LOT 13 & N1/2 LOT 14 BRICKELL INV RLTY CORP 1485 S MIAMI AVE % ELENA KOLA 1850 K ST NW WASHINGTON DC 20006 LOT 15 & PORT OF LOT 14 BRICKELL INV RLTY CORP 1460 BRICKELL AVE % ELENA KOLA 1850 K ST NW WASHINGTON DC 20006 17-18 BRICKELL INV REALTY CORP 5 S MIA AVE % ELENA NOLA 1850 K ST NW WASHINGTON DC 20006 O LOT 19 BRICKELL INV REALTY CORP 1475-1477 S MIAMI AVE % ELENA NOLA 1850 K ST NW WASHINGTON DC 20006 LOTS 20 & S1/2 LOT 21 BRICKELL INV REALTY CORP 1465 S MIAMI AVE % ELENA MOLA 1850 K ST NW WASHINGTON DC 20006 LOT 22 & N1/2 LOT 21 BRICKELL INV REALTY CORP 1451-1453 S MIAMI AVE % ELENA NOLA 1850 K ST NW OPASHINGTON DC 20006 LOT 23 BRICKELL INV REALTY CORP 1443 S MIAMI AVE % ELENA MOLA 1850 K ST NW WASHINGTON DC 20006 LOTS 24-25 BRICKELL INV REALTY CORP 1435 S MIAMI AVE % ELENA NOLA 1850 K ST NW WASHINGTON DC 20006 LOT 26 PHOENIX INV CO LE 1421 S MIAMI AVE REM RICHARD O'CONNELL TR 2121 SOP 3 AVE 8FL MIAMI FL 33129 NOPLY75FT OF LTS 27-28 PHOENIX INV CO LE 1411 S MIAMI AVE REM RICHARD O'CONNELL TR 2121 SOP 3 AVE 8FL MIAMI FL 33129 SOPLY75FT OF ITS 27-28 PHOENIX INV CO LE 20 SE 14TH ST REM RICHARD O'CONNELL TR 2121 SOP 3 AVE 8FL BRICKELL FLAGLER PB 5-44 MIAMI FL 33129 BLOCK 55 LOTS 41 & 42 EVERETT V SUG;ARSAKER 1500 BRICKELL AVE 1500 BRICKELL AVE MIAMI FL 33129 ST JAMES AT BRICKELL PB 146-99 7 A A TERREMARK BRICKELL LTD -NT 2601 S BAYSHORE DR PH1 F#01-4139-057-0010 MIA FL 33133 16-A & 16-B BRICKELL INV REALTY CORP 1 SE 15TH RD % ELENA MOLA 1850 K ST NIP WASHINGTON DC 20006 TERREMARK BRICKELL II 1441 Brickell Avenue Directory of Project Principals Owner/Developer Terremark Brickell II, Ltd. 2601 South Bayshore Drive Penthouse B Miami, FL 33133 Telephone: 856-3200 Fax: 856-8190 Manuel Medina Ed Jacobsen Architect: Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. 2601 South Bayshore Drive 10' Floor Miami, FL 33133 Telephone: 859-2050 Fax:860-3700 Willy Bermello Telephone 860-3735 Tere C . Garcia Telephone 860-3758 Vivian Bonet 859-2050 Landscape Architect: Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. 2601 South Bayshore Drive 10' Floor Miami, FL 33133 Telephone: 859-2050 Fax: 859-2454 George Puig Perla Aguayo Traffic: Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. 2601 South Bayshore Drive 10`h Floor Miami, FL 33133 Telephone: 859-2050 Fax: 859-9638 Vish Chowdhary Civil: Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. 2601 South Bayshore Drive 10" Floor Miami, FL 33133 Telephone: 859-2050 Fax: 859-9638 Fernando Alonso Telephone: 860-3705 Oliverio Sanchez Telephone: 860-3743 Economist: Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. 1 S.E. Third Avenue, Suite 2100 Miami, FL 33131 Telephone: 374-1574 Fax:372-8161 Darryl Sharpton Femi Sheyin Attorneys: Greenberg, Traurig, Hoffman Lipoff, Rosen & Quental, P.A. 1221 Brickell Avenue Miami, FL 33131 Fax: 579-0717 Lucia Dougherty, Esq. Telephone: 579-0603 Adrienne Friesner Pardo, Esq. Telephone: 579-0683 F:\LANDPLAN\TERE\brick2\DirecwryPrincipals.wpd TERREMARK BRICKELL II MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT Project Data Sheet 1. Legal Description 2. Address: 3. Zoning Classification: 4. Lot Area: Gross Area Net Area 5. Density: Units/Acre Allowed Units/Acre Provided 6. Allowable Area: Floor Area Ratio (FAR) Lots 1 through 23, inclusive, block 1, together with those alleys located within said Block 1, AMENDED PLAT OF POINT VIEW, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat book 2 at page 93 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. Said land lying and being in the City of Miami, Florida. 1401 Brickell Miami, Florida City of Miami SD-5 5.11 acres or 222,854 sq. ft. 3.74 acres or 161,989 sq. ft. 500 units/acre 32 units/acre 4.25 allowed 3.2 provided 7. Loading Berths: Required: 5 loading berths: 1 loading berths 12 ft. x 55 ft. x 15 ft. 4 loading berths 12 ft. x 35 ft. x 15 ft. Provided: 4 loading berths 12 ft. x 55 ft. x 15 ft. 2 loading berths 10 ft. x 20 ft. x 15 ft. 8. Height: Tower Parking Structure 9. Building Footprint: 10. No. Of Parking -Spaces Handicapped spaces 11. yOpen Space: 12. Setbacks: Brickell 14' Terrace and 14`h Lane Project Data Sheet (Cont.) No height limitation 577 ft. 1 in. provided (38 floors) 73 ft. 5 in. provided (7 floors) 116,396.68. ft. 942 required 964 provided 19 required 19 provided 33,428 required (15%) 75,612.72 provided (33%) 30 ft. required 30 ft. provided 15 ft. required 15 ft. provided Article H. TERREMARK BRICKELL II MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT Project Description Project Description A. Zoning Ordinance No. 11000 1. Section 1304.2.1 Applications Forms; Supplementary Materials 2. Section 1702.2.1 General Report 3. Section 1702.2.2 Major Use Special Permit Concept Plan 4. Section 1702.2.3 Development Impact Study TERREMARK BRICKELL II MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT Zoning Ordinance No. 110000 1. Section 1304.1.1 Application forms; supplementary materials (a) Statements of ownership and control of the proposed development of activity. The Disclosure of Ownership and Ownership Affidavit are provided in Article I. (b) Statement describing in detail the character and intended use of the development or activity. Brickell Terremark II is a 38 story tower with three components; a first class hotel, 40 luxury residential units, and an office component. The project is located on Brickell Avenue between 14`h Terrace and 14ffi Lane in the City of Miami, Florida. The development consists of a parcel with a net lot area of 162,989.56 square feet or 3.74 acres. The gross lot area is 222,854.12 square feet or 5.11 acres. The property fronts Brickell Avenue on the West, SE 14'hTerrace on the North, SE 14' Lane on the South and the circular continuation of SE 14`' Lane/Terrace on the East. The property is located within SD-5 zoning district. The proposed tower contains a five star, 246 room hotel, which spans the first 14 levels of the project. The next 4 levels contains 40 luxury residential units and the following 20 levels will house 372,788 square feet office development. The hotel will be the second 5-star hotel ever proposed in the area. It will provide it's guests with a ballroom, smaller meeting and board rooms, fitness/spa center, hotel restaurant and bar, among other amenities. The restaurant will have pedestrian access from Brickell, as well as from the hotel. In addition there will be retail along Brickell Avenue, 141h Terrace and 14`h Lane creating a urban plaza like atmosphere all around the site. The tower is situated on the western portion of the site with frontage along Brickell Avenue for an east -west exposure, maximizing bay views and respecting the distance from adjacent residential developments. The restaurants, bar and retail shops benefit from street level frontage and provide the right conditions to create an urban plaza along the surrounding streets. This activity will activate the sidewalks and provide a pleasant vital urban setting. ' - 1 - The project includes a 7 level parking structure with 963 parking spaces which supports the entire development. The seventh floor of the parking structure serves as the recreation deck which houses both indoor and outdoor amenities to serve the project. The project is designed in such as way that there is no exposure of the parking garage from Brickell or the surrounding streets. The main entrance to the project is through a beautifully landscaped six lane motor court, off 14d' Terrace, which enters into a porte cochere with covered access to both the hotel lobby and the office elevator lobby. There is a secondary access that takes the public directly to the 3rd floor ballroom by means of a specially designated elevator on the hotel lobby. Access to the ballroom is also provided by a grand staircase. Entrance to the parking garage is through the motor court at 14`'' Terrace. his entrance is opposite the hotel lobby for direct access to the parking structure for self and valet parking. An additional entrance only to the parking structure, to be used mostly by office employees and visitors, is located on the Southeast corner of 14d' Lane. The additional exit only for the parking facility is on 14"' Lane. This entrance and exit can also be used by hotel patrons when major events are booked and various point of access and egress are desirable. The service area for the tower is at 14d' Lane. A smaller service to be used by the retail is located at the northeast end of the site, on 14`h Terrace. The hotel component will include the following uses: Hotel Component 246 Guest rooms Public areas (Vestibules/lobbies) Hotel retail (Gift shop/sundries/specialty shops) Front desk/Public areas (Registration & other hotels support services) Guest amenities (Business center/spa/fitness center) Restaurant/Lounge/Bar/Gourmet Deli Function areas (Ballroom/meeting rooms & function support areas) Food service areas Maintenance (Housekeeping/employee facilities/mechanical/electrical) Offices (Executive/accounting/general) Circulation (Stairs/elevators/general circulation for public & staff Receiving/Purchasing (Service area & loading docks) -2- Residential Component 40 Apartment units Office Component 372,799 Square Feet Retail Space 3,837 Square Feet (within hotel) 14,985 Square Feet (within hotel) The ground floor houses utility facilities such as FPL transformer vault, emergency generator, main electrical and telephone rooms, domestic pumps and main mechanical rooms. The hotel and office service area is accessed from 14`" Lane. The retail service area is accessed from 14`h Terrace. Drawings showing the architectural character and location of the intended uses are included under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (c) General location map, showing relation of the site or activity for which special permit is sought to major streets, schools, existing utilities, shopping areas, important physical features in and adjoining the project or activity and the like. The following exhibits are included with the Major Use Special Permit Application: (1) Aerial: Aerial photograph of the surrounding area indicating the project site. (2) Area Context Map/Site Aerial: Map of the project area indicating buildings and their functions that surround the site. (3) Location Map: Map of the surrounding street system indicating the project location. (d) A site plan containing the title of the project and the names of the project planner and developer, date, and north arrow and, based on an exact survey of the property drawn to a scale of sufficient size to show. The project's developer is Terremark Brickell II, LTD. The architects, planners and engineers are Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. The general information requested is shown on the Ground/Site Plan, Sheet A-1.0, provided under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. The site plan includes the following: -3- (1) Boundaries of the project, any existing streets, buildings, watercourses, easements and section lines. The boundaries and the location of existing streets and easements are shown on the Boundary Survey located under Tab 5 of the Supporting Documents. (2) Exact location of all buildings and structures. The exact location of all existing buildings located on the property is shown on the Boundary Survey under Tab 5. The location of the buildings to be constructed are shown on the Context Site Plan, Sheet A-0-1, on the Ground/Site Plan, Sheet A-1.0 and on Ground Floor Landscape Plan, Sheet L-1, located under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (3) Access and traffic flow and how vehicular traffic will be separated from pedestrian and other types of traffic. Vehicular access for the tower is from 14`' Terrace through a landscaped, six lane motor court. Access to the parking garage for self and valet parking is located opposite the hotel lobby. There is an additional entrance located on the southeast corner of 14' Lane and an another exit is located on 14' Lane. These are to be used mostly by office patrons and visitors and for special hotel events. The service drives for the tower, as well as the loading areas are located on 14`, Lane. There is a smaller service drive with loading bays located at the Northeast corner of 141h Terrace to be used by the retail shops. The project can be accessed by pedestrians from Brickell and 141h Terrace and the retail area can be accessed by Brickell, 14`h Lane and 14`h Terrace. The plazas surrounding the entire building and garage create a pedestrian friendly urban environment which is activated by the retail shops at street level frontage. A detailed analysis of the site access and traffic flow is provided in the Traffic Impact Analysis located under Tab 2 of the Supporting Documents. (4) Off street parking and off street loading areas. The off street parking facility is located adjacent to the tower toward the eastern portion of the property. The parking structure contains 6 levels of parking with 963 parking spaces which support the entire development. The seventh floor of the structure serves as the recreation deck. The off street parking facility is shown on Sheet A-1.0 and on Sheets A-2.2 through A-2.8 and A-3.0, provided under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. -4- The Zoning Ordinance requires 5 loading bays, 1 at 12 ft. x 55 ft. and 4 at 12 ft. X 35 ft. We are requesting a Class II Permit to provide 4 loading bays, 12 ft. x 55 ft., to service the hotel, the office and the residences and 2 additional loading bays, 10 ft. x 20 ft., to service the retail areas. The reduced size of the loading bays will allow for a mitigated exposure of the bays and service areas from the street. The 4 loading bays 12 ft. X 55 ft. are located on 14`h Lane and the 2 smaller loading bays are located at the northeast corner of 14`h Terrace. The clearance for all hotel loading bays is 15 ft. Service areas are shown on the Ground/Site Plan, Sheet A-1.0, under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (5) Recreational facilities locations. The 7t' floor of the parking garage serves as a recreation deck for the development and includes indoor and outdoor amenities. The indoor recreational facilities include: two racquetball courts, a 3-lap loop pool, jacuzzi, lockers, bathrooms and showers. Exterior facilities include a tennis court, a basketball court, a jogging and walking trail, a vita course, a rock climbing course and a garden and sun deck. There is also a cafe and bar, as well as a garden with a reflecting pool and trellis covered pergolas. This creates the atmosphere of a urban park for the use of the residents, the hotel and office patrons. These recreational facilities are accessed from the parking garage elevators and from, the tower through the ground and fourth floor connecting bridges that take the patron to the parking garage elevators. These facilities are shown on the Typical Residential Floor Plan A - 4.0, and on the Recreation Deck Landscape Plan, Sheet L-2, located under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. Recreational facilities for the hotel at the 4`h level of the tower include three separate elements: a fitness center, spa, beauty salon, an outdoor pool, jacuzzi and sun deck; a long sculpture garden and terrace with reflecting pools and sitting areas; and a Ballroom Garden to serve as a pre -function meeting area with doors that connect to the Ballroom area. These special amenities are shown on the Sculpture Terrace and Hotel Pool Landscape.Plan, Sheet L-3 and on the Ball Room Garden Terrace, Sheet L-3 on Tab 6 of' -the Supporting Documents. -5- Located within the hotel, there is a restaurant, lounge and bar with access from Brickell Avenue to serve both the hotel guests and the public. The retail component covers the street level shops, as well as those around the garage and within the hotel. These facilities are shown on the Ground/Site Plan, Sheet A- 1.0, located under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (6) Screens and buffers. Along 14`h Lane and all along 14`h Terrace adjacent to the retail, a bosque of large specimen oak trees underplanted with native groundcovers, provide shade within the pedestrian plaza. Along the curved drive where 14th Lane and Terrace meet there is a grouping of Royal Palms framing the view. A freeform groundcover bed and flowering shrubs give color and form at the base of these palms . Along Brickell Avenue a grouping of large specimen Phoenix Dactylifera palms arranged in a grid, assist in the transition of scale between the building and the front pedestrian plaza, and define the main pedestrian entrance to the building. The motor court includes a landscaped median with large Phoenix Dactylifera palms underplanted with evergreen tropical shrubs, accent plants and flowering groundcover. These plants define the main vehicular drive and create a sense of arrival and entry to the project. Service areas and drives are screened with a combination of native and tropical trees, shrubs and groundcovers. Landscaping and buffer areas are indicated on the Ground/Site Plan, Sheet L-1, L-2, L-3 and L-4 located under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (7) Refuse collections areas. Waste collection will be provided by a containerized compactor system located within the service area in the residential tower. In addition the project will have a high rise recycling system. The hotel includes a dry wash, refrigerated garbage rooms and can wash. These facilities are shown on the' Ground/Site Plan, Sheet A-1.0, located under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (8) Access to utilities and points of utilities hookups. Access and connections to site utilities are discussed in the Site Utility Study located under Tab 3 of the Supporting Documents. (e) Tabulations of total gross acreage in the project and the percentages thereof proposed to be devoted to: (1) The various permitted uses. Tower and Garage (footprint - 133,813.82 sq. ft.) The development and uses included within the Tower and Garage are divided into the following percentages of the buildings not of the site: Hotel 25 % Residential 6 % Office 27 % Rec. Deck .3 % Parking 34 % Other uses 7.7 % Open area, plazas, exterior courts and streets: (Does not count plazas and recreational areas on the 7th floor of the garage and the fourth floor of the tower) (2) Ground coverage by structures. 52 % of gross lot area. 48 % of gross lot area. Ground coverage by the structures is 52 % of the total gross lot area. (f) Tabulation showing the following: (1) The derivation of numbers of off street parking and off street loading spaces shown in (d) above. The total number of off street par ' paces required is 942 spaces and the total number of spaces provided i 96 spaces. Derivatign of the numbers of off street parking is shown under Proje Criteria - Parking/Loading, within the Project Summary, located under Tab 6. -7- (2) Total project density in dwelling units per acre. Total project density is 32 units per acre (g) If common facilities (such as recreation areas of structures, private streets, common open space, etc.) are to be provided for the development, statements as to how such common facilities are to be provided and permanently maintained. All common facilities provided will be maintained by the Owner(s). (h) Storm drainage and sanitary sewerage plans. Storm drainage, water distribution, waste water and solid waste generation provisions are discussed in the Site Utility Study located under Tab 3 of the Supporting Documents. (i) Architectural definitions for buildings in the development; exact number of dwelling units, sizes and types, together with typical floor plans of each type. Detailed information and breakdown of square footage of all uses are found under Project Criteria within The Project Summary, included under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. Typical floor plans for the hotel units are shown on the Typical Hotel Floor Plans 5`h to 14`h, Sheet A-3.0. Typical floor plans for residential units are shown on the Typical Residential Floor Plans, included in Sheet A-4.0. Typical office floor plans are shown on the Typical Office Floor Plans on Sheets A- 5.0 and A-5.1. All drawings are located under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. 0) Plans for signs, if any. The project includes "signature" signs. The hotel and office includes signs at Brickell and at the motor lobby. The retail includes signs as part of the storefront facades. (k) Landscaping plan, including types, sizes and locations of vegetation and decorative shrubbery, and showing provisions for irrigation and future maintenance. The landscape plans showing vegetation are found on the Ground Floor Landscape Plan, Sheet L-1, the Recreation Deck Landscape Plan, Sheet �=2, the Ball Room Garden Terrace, Sheet L-3 and the Sculpture Terrace and Hotel Pool Landscape Plan, Sheet L-4. All landscape plans are located under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (1) Plans for recreation facilities, if any, including location and general description of building for such use. The 7`h floor of the parking garage serves as a recreation deck for the development and includes indoor and outdoor amenities. The indoor recreational facilities include: two racquetball courts, a 3-lap loop pool, Jacuzzi, lockers, bathrooms and showers. Exterior facilities include a tennis court, a basketball court, a jogging and walking trail, a vita course, a rock climbing course and a garden and sun deck. There is also a cafe and bar, as well as a garden with a reflecting pool and trellis covered pergolas. This creates the atmosphere of a urban park for the use of the residents; the hotel and office patrons. These recreational facilities are accessed from the parking garage elevators and from the tower through the ground and fourth floor connecting bridges that take the patron to the parking garage elevators. These facilities are shown on the Typical Residential Floor Plan A - 4.0, and on the Recreation Deck Landscape Plan, Sheet L-2, located under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. Recreational facilities for the hotel at the 4`' level of the tower include three separate elements: a fitness center, spa, beauty salon, an outdoor pool, Jacuzzi and sun deck; a long sculpture garden and terrace with reflecting pools and sitting areas; and a Ballroom Garden to serve as a pre -function meeting area with doors that connect to the Ballroom area. These special amenities are shown on the Sculpture Terrace and Hotel Pool Landscape Plan, Sheet L-3 and on the Ball Room Garden Terrace, Sheet L-3 on Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. Located within the hotel, there is a restaurant, lounge and bar with access from Brickell Avenue to serve both the hotel guests and the public. The retail component covers the street level shops, as well as those around the garage and within the hotel. These facilities are shown on the Ground/Site Plan, Sheet A-1.0, located under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (m) Such additional data, maps, plans, or statements as may be required for the particular use or activity involved. The details of the spaces and calculations used to compute the Floor Area Ratio (FAR) are shown on the FAR Plans, Sheets FAR -CAL, FAR-GRND, FAR-2,d to FAR- 4`h, FAR -HOTEL, FAR-RESID AND FAR -OFFICE provided under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. The drawings covering the roof and mechanical, electrical and plumbing rooms are included also under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. IM (n) Such additional data as the Applicant may believe is pertinent to the proper consideration of the site and development plan. Sections and elevations depicting the architectural character of the building are shown on the Buildings Elevations,, Sheets A-6.0. A-6.0a, A-6.1 to A-6.3 and Building Section, Sheet A-7.0 and A-7.1. All elevations and sections are located under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. 2. Section 1702.2.1 General Report (1) Property ownership or ownership and beneficial interest within the boundaries of the area proposed for Major Use Special Permit. Statement of Ownership and beneficial interest within the boundaries of the area proposed for Major Use Special Permit are provided in Article I. (2) The nature of the unified interest or control. The nature of unified interest or control is indicated in Article I. (3) Survey of the proposed area showing property lines and ownership. A copy of the Boundary Survey is included under Tab 5 of the Supporting Documents. (4) Map of existing features, including streets, alleys, easements, utilities' lines, existing land use , general topography and physical features. The existing site features and utility lines are shown on the Boundary Survey of the property located under Tab 5. The site features and the utilities are also described in the Site Utility Study, located under Tab 3 of the Supporting Documents. (5) Materials to demonstrate the relationship of the elements listed in (4) preceding to surrounding area characteristics. The Drawings submitted with this Application are located under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. WIN (6) Existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan designations for the area on and around the lands proposed for Major Use Special Permit. The existing zoning designation for the property pursuant to City of Miami Ordinance No. 11000, is SD-5. Page 37 of the Zoning Atlas Map is located in Article I, and indicates the existing and surrounding zoning. The comprehensive plan future land use designation for the property is Office. The zoning and the comprehensive plan designation are consistent with one another. 3. Section 1702.2.2 Major Use Special Permit Concept Plan. (a) Relationships of the concept plan to surrounding, existing and proposed future uses, activities, systems, and facilities (transportation, recreation, view corridors, pedestrian systems, service systems and similar uses). Article II contains a written narrative of this project outlining proposed uses, activities and architectural character. This narrative also contains descriptions of the project's relationship to traffic, pedestrian movements, and transportation access. Building elevations and sections showing the proposed materials, vertical profile and height, and orientation to streets is included in the Drawings submitted with this Application. The list of Drawings submitted is found under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (b) Existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan principles and designations. This project conforms to the SD-5 zoning district designated for this property. The comprehensive plan future land use designation conforms with the land use designation currently in effect for this property. 4. Section 1702.2.3 Developmental Impact Study (a) A traffic analysis shall be submitted for an area within approximately 1/4 mile of the site, or an area including the major intersections to be impacted by the site, whichever is larger. The Traffic Impact Analysis is included under Tab 2 of the Supporting Documents. - 11 - (b) Economic impact data shall be provided, including estimates for construction costs, construction employment and permanent employment and shall demonstrate that the proposed development is favorable to the economy, public services, environment and housing supply of the City. The Economic Impact Study is included under Tab 4 of the Supporting Documents. © A housing impact assessment. There will be 40 residential units within the development. The average rental price will range from $2,150 to $6,600 per month. (d) A description of proposed energy conservation measures shall be provided, including only those measures that are proposed in addition to the minimum requirements in State Energy Code. Architecturally, the building envelope will be comprised of insulated walls and roof. Tinted glass will be used throughout the building. Electrically, all exterior and landscape lighting will be controlled by means of time clocks and photocell switches. Energy saving lamps, ballasts and fixtures are being considered at cores and public spaces. (e) Historic Buildings There are no existing historic structures located on the property. (f) Environmental Impacts The property is not located within an environmental preservation district. -12- TERREMARK BRICKELL II MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT Supporting Documents Article III. Supporting Documents Tab I Minority Construction Employment Plan Tab 2 Traffic Impact Analysis Tab 3 Site Utility Study Tab 4 Economic Impact Study Tab 5 Survey of Property Tab 6 Drawings TERREMARK BRICKELL II MINORITY CONSTRUCTION EMPLOYMENT PLAN October 31, 1997 INC. 2601 S. BAYSHORE DR. PH-18, COCONUT GROVE. FL 33133 PHONE: (305) 856-3200 / FAX (305) 856-8190 EQUAL OPPORTUNITY STATEMENT CORPORATE STATEMENT: Terremark is committed to ensure that our organization, and the organizations with which we contract, reflect the cultural and ethnic diversity of the areas within which we operate. To this end, we warrant to administer ourselves in such a manner as to guarantee equal and fair employment practices. We shall not discriminate with regard to race, color, religion, sex, age or national origin. POLICY: Recruitment, selection, placement and layoff decisions will be based solely on a candidates or contractors job related qualifications and abilities, consistent with job requirements. All employees, job applicants and/ or contractors are guaranteed equal employment opportunity without regard for race, color, religion, sex age or national origin. Personnel policies and practices including compensation, benefits, safety and health programs will be so governed. Furthermore, all necessary steps will be taken to ensure that each employees work environment, regardless of corporate origin, is free from unlawful discrimination or harassment of any kind related to race, color, religion, sex, age or national origin. BERMELLO-AJAMIL & P A R T N E R S- I N C A M C H 1 7 E C T U R E E N G I N E E R I N G - P L A N N I N G I N T E R 1 0 R 0 E S 1 G N l A N 0 S C A P E A R C H I T E C T U R E July 28, 1997 MEMORANDUM TO: All Employees I ROM: Willy A. Bermello 3,: AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PLAN AS OF AUGUST 1, 1997 EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY POLICY STATEMENT: is the policy of BERMELLO, AJAMIL & PARTNERS, INC. to base employment on merit, -califications and competency and that its personnel practices will not be influenced by an �,pplicant's or employee's race, color, place of birth, religion, national origin, sex, age, marital =:us, veteran or handicapped status. ;rn of the management duties of all principals at BERMELLO, AJAMIL & PARTNERS, INC. is ensure that the following personnel practices are being satisfied: Take every necessary affirmative action to attract and retain qualified employees. Maintain equitable principles in the recruitment, hiring, training, compensation and promotion of employees. . Monitor and review personnel practices to guarantee that equal opportunities are being provided to all employees. —Nl=-LLO, AJAMIL & PARTNERS, INC. is committed to take affirmative action and Sze sively pursue activities that will serve to enhance our total participation, in good faith, enable qualified employees and applicants the opportunities available throughout this _r�;sTization. _--ny, the above actions cannot be accomplished as a secondary duty for any individual the full support of management. And so, to scrutinize our efforts, BERMELLO, --:.NlIL & PARTNERS, INC. has assigned Mr.. Nelson C. Martinez, Partner / in charge of = rnel, as the Affirmative Action Director to monitor all activities of this program. ::_7H BAYSHORE DRIVE • IOTH FLOOR • MIAMI FL 33133 • 305 859 2050 • FAX 305 859 9639 Affirmative Action Plan Page Two Bermello, Ajamil & Partners' Affirmative Action Plan, as approved by Metropolitan Dade County, and established by the principals of the firm, is revised as the minimum effort that the firm will expend in promoting the use of disadvantaged and minority business in this community, and providing economic opportunities. The firm is and will continue to exceed the plan goals and objectives. The Affirmative Action Plan is based on the principals' belief that our Dade County community can only improve if the lifestyles of every single disadvantaged group in the community is advanced. A commitment exists from our firm that as it grows and matures, special emphasis will be sought to find and provide opportunities for professional, managerial and partnership opportunities for especially Black minorities. The firm has made positive strides in this endeavor. As one of South Florida's most diversified architectural/engineering firms, B&A has an ethnic and gender balance in the workforce that is a model for the industry: 54.1 % of its workforce is Hispanic, 7.5% is African -American, 6.0% Asian/other, and 35.5% is female, with many in senior positions. In addition, the partners of the firm "practice what they preach" by participating in community activities which are designed to promote the above stated objectives. Mr. Bermello has recently been Chairman of the Florida Commission on Human Relations, State of Florida, where in 1992 he received the Civil Rights Leadership Award for his participation in the Florida Civil Rights Act, while Mr. Ajamil has been elected to Black Economic Development Team Miami of the Beacon Council. The firm continues to support functions such as recently the Miami Negro College Fund. One of the most important things that the firm has been doing is actively seeking Black professionals in the fields of expertise that the firm is practicing. Sincerely, V" 'Hilly A. Bermello, AIA, AICP Fresident BERMELLO-AJAMIL P A R T N E R S- I N C A R C N I T E C T U R E - E N G 1 N E E R I N G - P L A N K I N G - I N T E R 1 0 R D E S I G N - L A N D S C A P E A R C N I T E C T U R E DECLARATION OF POLICY In accordance with County Ordinance 82-37, Amending Section 2-10.4 (5) (d) of the Dade County Code, BERMELLO, AJAMIL & PARTNERS, INC. affirms its commitment to submittal of an Affirmative Action Plan for the purpose of maintaining equal employment and promotional opportunity with particular emphasis on the Black work force population and utilization of Black professional firms, consultants and/or suppliers. t Willy A. Ber ello Chief Execu ive Officer BERMELLO, AJAMIL & PARTNERS, INC. d(f Luis Ajamil Executive Vice President BERMELLO, AJAMIL & PARTNERS, INC. Ndison 1C. Martinez Affirmative Action Officer 3ERMELLO, AJAMIL & PARTNERS, INC. made County Representing Authority I/M/17 ate -7h?h7 Date A I&A Date Date SOUTH BAYSHORE DRIVE • 10TH FLOOR • MIAMI FL 33133 • 305 859 2050 - FAX 305 859 9638 AACOAO17-;QW-n, -' re.. — AFFIRMATIVE ACTION POLICY FOR EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY AFFIRMATIVE ACTION/ EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY - POLICY STATEMENT It is the policy of BERMELLO, AJAMIL & PARTNERS, INC. to base its hiring and promotions on merit, qualifications and competency and that its personnel practices will not be influenced by an applicant's or employee's race, color, place of birth, religion, national origin, sex, age, marital status, veteran and handicapped status. One of the management duties of all principals at BERMELLO, AJAMIL & PARTNERS, INC. is to ensure that the following personnel practices are being satisfied: 1. Take every necessary affirmative action to attract and retain qualified employees, regardless of race, color, place of birth, religion, national origin, sex, age, marital status, veteran and handicapped status. 2. Maintain equitable principles in the recruitment, hiring, training, compensation and promotion of employees. 3. Monitor and review personnel practices to guarantee that equal opportunities are being provided to all employees, regardless of race, color, place of birth, religion, national origin, sex, age, marital status, veteran and handicapped status. BERMELLO, AJAMIL & PARTNERS, INC. is committed to take affirmative action and aggressively pursue activities that will serve to enable all employees and applicants opportunities available throughout this organization. dearly, the above actions cannot be accomplished as a secondary duty for any individual, respite the full support of management. And so, to monitor our efforts, BERMELLO, AJAMIL A PARTNERS, INC. has assigned one of its principals as the Affirmative Action Director to -monitor all activities of this program. ;,mployees may contact Nelson Martinez at 859-2050 regarding this Affirmative Action Policy. _ATE: July 28 1997 Signature/Title) Willy Ber Ilo, lPre6ei4nt 8 E R M E L L 0 A J A M I L & P A R T N E R S I N C STATISTICAL WORKTORCE ANALYSIS WORK FORCE COMPOSITION (ETHNICITY AND GENDER) ANGLO BLACK HISPANIC OTHER COMBINED TOTALS JOB CATEGORY MALE 1 FEMALE 1 MALE 0 FEMALE 0 MALE 6 MALE 1 MALE 0 FEAIALE ANGLO BLACK ILISP OTHER Principals and 0 2 0 7 0 Managers 0.8% 0.8 0.0% 0.0% 4.5% 0.8% 0.0% 0.0% 1.5% 0.0% 5.3% 0.0% Registered 11 2 2 0 13 4 1 0 13 2 17 1 Professionals (Not. Incl. above) 8.3% 1.5% 1.5% 0.0% 9.8% 3.0% 0.8% 0.0% 9.8% 1.5% 12.8% 0.8% 15 6 3 3 15 11 5 0 21 6 26 5 Other Professionals 11.3% 4.5% 2.3% 2.3% 11.3% 8.3% 3.8% 0.0% 15.8% 4.5% 19.5% 3.8% 3 0 0 0 7 2 1 0 3 0 9 1 Para Professionals 2.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 5.3% 1.5% .8% 0.0% 2.3% 0 0% 6.8% .8% 0 4 0 2 3 10 0 1 4 2 13 1 Office and Clerical 0.0% 3.0% 0.0% 1.5% 2.3% 7.5% 0.0% 0.8% 3.0% 1.5% 9.8% 0.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Others 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% TOTAL, 30 13 5 5 44 28 7 1 43 10 72 8 BREAKDOWN 22.6% 9.8% 3.8% 3.8% 33.1% 21.1% 5.3% 0.8% 32.3% 7.5% 54.1% 6.0% TOTAL EMPLOYEES 133 BERMEL Ili & PARTNERS, INC. am of Firm Signature of Aut orized Representative Luis Aiamil, Executive Vice President _ July 22, 1997 Name of Principal Date PROUr{AMMATIC ACTIVITIES AND GOALS 1. RECRUITMENT/ADVERTISING All employment advertising will include a statement of Equal Employment Opportunity. In addition, advertising will utilize Hispanic and Black media (e.g. Miami Times). With respect to use of part-time college students, efforts have been made to include Black and Female candidates in the interview/hiring process (e.g. Florida Memorial College and other Black colleges). We have also printed up two brochures to distribute to colleges indicating our commitment to hire minorities. 2. HIRING PROCEDURES All positions will be filled without regard to race, color, religion, sex or national origin. BERMELLO, AJAMIL & PARTNERS, INC. is dedicated to a policy of equal employment opportunities for minorities. 3. PROMOTION PROCEDURES BERMELLO, AJAMIL & PARTNERS, INC. maintains equitable principals in the promotion of employees as stated in the Affirmative Action Plan. The Affirmative Action Plan is based on the principals' belief that our Dade County community can only improve if the lifestyles of every single disadvantaged group in the community is advanced. A commitment exists from our firm that as it grows and matures, special emphasis will be sought to find and provide opportunities for professional, managerial and partnership opportunities for all minorities. The firm has made positive strides in this endeavor. As one of South Florida's most diversified architectural/engineering firms, B&A has an ethnic and gender balance in the workforce that is a model for the industry: 54.1 % of its workforce is Hispanic, 7.5% is African -American, 6.0% Asian/other, and 35.5% is female, with many in senior positions. During the past year, we promoted within the firm two women to the position of Senior Associate, as well as four women and two African -Americans to the position of Associate. We continually monitor and review personnel practices to guarantee that equal opportunities are being provided to all employees, regardless of race, color, place of birth, religion, national origin, sex, age, marital status, veteran and handicapped status. 4. TRAINING BERMELLO, AJAMIL & PARTNERS, INC. provides training and continuing education opportunities to all of its employees regardless of their race, color, religion, sex or national origin. 5. PUBLICITY B&A has developed and printed an Affirmative Action brochure which we are sending to colleges throughout the country to show our commitment to hiring of minorities. In all external publicity materials, an Affirmative Action statement will be included with the printed material. In addition, where pictures are used, minorities will be included. 8 E R M E L L 0 A J A M t L & P A R T N E R S I N C UTILIZATION OF LOCAL MINORITY BUSINESSES BERMELLO, AJAMIL & PARTNERS, INC. endeavors to utilize Black/Minority and Women - owned firms for printing, photography, public relations, advertising and promotion, and will continue to solicit minority firms to bid on contracts for services. (See attached listing) The following lists some of our contributions to Black minorities: • 7.5% OF B&A'S Staff is Black • B&A has contributed the following Pro -Bono work: • Overtown Advisory Board - Computerized presentation of Overtown Redevelopment Plan (10 shows) • Space Planning for City of Miami's N.E.T. office in Overtown • Douglas Apartments District Task Force - Computerized presentation • Offered mentoring and proposal coordination to Architectural Design Consortium (a Black architecture company) for the African -American Library project. Support included: - guidance with structure/composition of the team - guidance regarding doing associated homework; visiting site and personnel to determine important issues to address - format and content of the initial submittal - support/training the office person producing the submittal; frequent phone conversations - review of the submittal with suggestions for edit; actual edit of cover letter - guidance/support of technical submittal; suggestions on formatting; what/how to request info from subs; actual hands-on production and editing support - guidance on presentation content and personal presentation skills - designed and produced the multimedia presentation with our personnel and equipment - provided personnel and equipment on site for multimedia presentation • B&A Advertises in the Miami Times • B&A Participates in the SER-JOBS Program for On -The -Job Training of Minorities in entry- level positions • B&A Recruits Annually at Florida A&M's College of Architecture 9 E R M E L L 0 A J A M I L h P A R T N E R S I N C • Black Professional Consultants: Over the years, B&A has retained the services of the following Black professionals: George Knox, Attorney Ron Frazier Darryl Sharpton, CPA Jimmie Allen PAWA Complex Williams Russell Johnson Unison Consulting Dickey Consultants PEER Consultants Civil-Cadd, Inc. Architectural Design Consortium Jackson & Tull Chartered Engineers • Willy A. Bermello Endowed Teaching Chair Miami Dade Community College/Black or Hispanic Teacher - Fine Arts Endowment ................................ $45,000.00 • Commissioner, Florida Human Relations Commission Willy A. Bermello served (7) years as Commissioner, Florida Human Relations Commission, elected Chairman in 1992 and awarded the 1992 Civil Rights Award. • In 1996, B&A made Contributions to the following: City of Miami DDA - Urban Development Committee Florida Commission on Human Relations Hands On Miami Anti -Defamation League YWCA Belafonte Tacolcy Center Christmas Toy/Gift Collection United Way Pacesetters Partners for Safe Neighborhood YMCA/YWCA of Greater Miami Girl Scout Council of Tropical Florida New Horizons Community Mental Health Center The Salvation Army Richmond Perrine Optimist Club Boys & Girls Clubs of Miami, Inc. • In 1996 B&A has contracted the following Black Firms in Contracts Awarded to B&A: Civil Cadd - Civil Engineers / Miami Dade Water & Sewer Misc. Services, Type "B" Dickey Consultants - South Miami Community Redevelopment Agency Miami NDT - Geotechnical Engineers / Tri-Rail Misc. Services Peer Consultants - Civil Engineers / WASD Misc. Services Williams Russell & Johnson - FLL Airfield Improvements Jackson & Tull Chartered Engineers - Port of Miami, Terminal 12 Parking Garage, structural engineering services. • In 1996, B&A promoted two African -Americans to the position of Associate. B E R M E L L 0 A J A M I L & P A R T N E R S I N C TERREMARK BRICKELL II TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY SUBMITTED TO: CITY OF MIAMI PREPARED FOR: TERREMARK BRICKELL II PARTNERSHIP PREPARED BY: BERMELLO, AJAMIL & PARTNERS, INC.' OCTOBER 31,1997 Table of Contents Section Page No. 1. INTRODUCTION ..............................................................I 1.1 Background.........................................................1 1.2 Purpose of the Study .................................................. 1 1.3 Study Area..........................................................3 2. EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS ................................................. 4 2.1 Existing Roadway Network ............................................. 4 2.2 Existing Traffic Volume ............................................... 4 2.3 Traffic Signal Timing Plans ............................................. 7 2.4 Existing Capacity and Level of Service (LOS) .............................. 7 2.5 Transit Routes and Stations ............................................. 9 3. TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS AND IMPACTS ............................................ 12 3.1 Trip Generations....................................................12 3.2 Trip Distribution....................................................14 3.3 Background Traffic..................................................15 3.4 Committed Traffic Impact ............................................. 15 3.5 Programmed and Planned Developments ................................. 18 3.6 Project's Transportation Impacts ........................................ 18 3.7 Signal Warrant Analysis at SE 14' Terrace and Brickell Avenue ............... 23 4. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS ................................................. 26 5.APPENDICES...............................................................29 Appendix 1: Brickell Bayfront Club Project PM Peak Hour Traffic Volume. Appendix 2: Intersection of Brickell Avenue and SE 15' Road - SIG/CINEMA Analysis for 1997 Existing Conditions. Appendix 3: Intersection of Brickell Avenue and SE 13t' Street - SIG/CINEMA Analysis for 1997 Existing Conditions. Appendix 4: FDOT ART -TAB Analysis for 1997 Existing Conditions. Appendix 5: Intersection of Brickell Avenue and SE 15`'' Road - SIG/CINEMA Analysis for Year 2000 Traffic Conditions. Appendix 6: Intersection of Brickell Avenue and SE 131'' Street.- SIG/CINEMA Analysis for Year 2000 Traffic Conditions. Appendix 7: FDOT ART -TAB Analysis for Year 2000 Traffic Conditions. Appendix 8: Intersection of Brickell Avenue and SE le Terrace - SIG/CINEMA and TRAF-NETSIM Analysis for Year 2000 Traffic Conditions. Appendix 9: AADT Trends Within the Study Area Between 1993 and 1996. 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 BACKGROUND Terremark Brickell II partnership plans to build a 38-story building consisting of 14 floors of hotel, 4 floors of residential, and 20 floors of office. In addition, the proposed project has a six -floor parking garage, which provides for 975 parking spaces and a recreation deck on the seventh floor. The ground floor includes retail use and a drive -through bank. The project is located in the Brickell area of Downtown Miami between Brickell Avenue to the west, SE 14`' Lane to the south and SE 14`h Terrace to the north, and is enclosed by the curved road on the east. The project site is shown in Figure 1. The proposed land uses and their intensities are as shown in Table 1. Table 1: Project Land Uses and Intensities Land Use Structure Number of Units Residential 4 Floors 44 DU Hotel 14 Floors 246 Rooms Recreational 1 Floor N/A Retail Ground Floor 18,822 SF Parking Garage 6 Floors 975 Spaces Drive Through Teller Ground Floor 2 Lanes Office 20 Floors 379,799 SF 1.2 PURPOSE OF THE STUDY The purpose of this study is to assess the impacts of vehicular traffic on signalized intersections and roadways within the study area due to the proposed development by conducting a roadway link and signalized intersection level of service analysis. This report discusses the following items: Terremark Brickell II - Traffic Impact Study October 31, 1997 Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. Page 1 Figure 1: Project Site Terremark Brickell II - Traffic Impact Study October 31, 1997 Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. Page 2 Existing traffic volumes and levels of service for major roadways within the study area. Number of trips generated by the proposed project and the distribution of these trips within the study area network. Future background and project traffic conditions and level of service. Determination of whether the impacts of the proposed project exceed the City of Miami concurrency standards, and solutions to mitigate adverse impacts, if any. 1.3 STUDY AREA The study area boundary includes SW 13" Street on the north, SE 15' Road on the south, Brickell Avenue on the west. Figure 1 shows the site location and major roadway network in the vicinity of the proposed development. Brickell Avenue provides indirect access to the site from the north and south via SE 14' Lane and SE 14`' Terrace. The project's study area intersections and roadway links to be analyzed in the vicinity of the site were identified in consultation with the City of Miami. Two signalized intersections within the study area were identified for analysis: Brickell Avenue & SE 13' Street and Brickell Avenue & SE 15`' Road. The Brickell Avenue corridor from SE 13`' Street to SE 15`' Road was also identified for the link capacity analysis. The study area boundaries and intersections to be analyzed were determined using the methodology outlined in the Fortune House MUSP traffic study of 1995. Since Fortune House (a residential high-rise of 297 units) is directly across from Terremark Brickell II off SE 14' Terrace, this provided a sound basis for study area determination and traffic analysis methodology for the Terremark Brickell II project. Terremark Brickell II - Traffic Impact Study October 31, 1997 Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. Page 3 2. EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS The 1996 and 1997 existing physical and operational characteristics of the study area roadway network related to the scope of this study were collected through field visits, from Metro -Dade County Traffic Engineering Department and from the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT). Furthermore, Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. (B&A) conducted a transportation impact study for Brickell Bayfront Club (currently know as Fortune House) project in June 1995, which is in the immediate vicinity of Terremark Brickell II project. The Brickell Bayfront project is located on Brickell Avenue between SE 14t' Street and SE 14'' Terrace. As such, and in consultation with the City of Miami, the 1995 Brickell Bayfront Club study was used as another source of information, as needed. 2.1 EXISTING ROADWAY NETWORK Within the study area, Brickell Avenue is a four -lane divided arterial with high signal density. The roadway provides left -turn bays at signalized and unsignalized intersections. SE 15th Road is four - lane divided west of Brickell Avenue and two-lane divided east of Brickell Avenue. Coral Way (SE 13' Street) is a four -lane undivided arterial within the study area, and other local roadways are two- lane undivided. Parking was observed on both sides of South East Bayshore Drive, on SE I Street, SE 14' Terrace and SE 15`' Road. The existing roadway geometric configurations for intersections, connecting roadways and existing on -street parking are shown in Figure 2. 2.2 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUME A review of the existing FDOT and Metro -Dade County traffic countswithin the study area and the vicinity was conducted. There are only four FDOT count stations within thg'study area and vicinity. The most updated, 1996, peak hour volume, average annual daily traffic (AADT) volume, peak hour factors (PHF), and directional split factors (D) were obtained from the Florida Department of Terremark Brickell II - Traffic Impact Study October 31, 1997 Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. Page 4 Figure 2: Terremark Brickell II - Traffic Impact Study October 31, 1997 Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. Page 5 Transportation, Planning Division of District Six. In the 1995 Brickell Bayfront Club study the PM peak hour turning movement traffic was counted at the two signalized intersections within the study area (see Appendix 1). These intersections are Brickell Avenue & SW 13`h Street and Brickell Avenue & SE 15' Road. At the time the aforementioned study was conducted, there was roadway construction along Brickell Avenue and Brickell Bridge over the Miami River. As such, traffic volume and turning movement counts along Brickell Avenue and, especially, at the intersection of SE 13`' Street and Brickell Avenue were impacted by the construction and closure of the Brickell Bridge. A review of the AADT volumes from FDOT count stations within the study area indicated that from year 1995 to 1996 there was a 25 percent increase along SE 13`' Street. However, traffic volume increase along Brickell Avenue between 1995 and 1996 ranged from 10 percent south of SW 15`' Road to 66 percent north of SE 13' Street. This sharp increase in traffic volume over one year span was due to resumption of pre -construction traffic pattern after the end of construction and opening of the Brickell Bridge. A review of traffic volume trends from count stations between 1993 (before construction) and 1996 (after construction) within the study area indicated that traffic volumes over this period did not increase, i.e., the 1996 AADT volumes are less than or equal to the 1993 AADT volumes. The 1996 traffic volume within the study area regressed to approximately the 1993 traffic volume level, see Appendix 9. PM peak hour volumes for eastbound, northbound, and southbound approaches at the intersection of Brickell Avenue and SE 13`h Street were obtained from the FDOT traffic count stations in the immediate vicinity. However, there is no count station that accounts for the westbound approach traffic volume approach at this intersection. In addition, traffic count stations within the study area are relatively remote from the intersection of SE 15`' Road and Brickell Avenue and, therefore, would not accurately account for approaches's traffic volumes. As previously mentioned, the 1996 AADT volume along SE 13' Street increased by 25 percent compared to the previous year's. The AADT volumes at the count station adjacent to the intersection Terremark Brickell II - Traffic Impact Study October 31, 1997 Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. Page 6 of SE 15' Street and Brickell Avenue increased by 10 percent. Therefore, the PM peak hour traffic volumes reported in Brickell Bayfront Club report for westbound SE 13`' Street and the intersection of SE 15' Road and Brickell Avenue approaches were increased by 25 percent and 10 percent, respectively to calculate the 1996 PM peak volumes. The turning -volume percentages reported in the 1995 Brickell Bayfront Club study were maintained for most of the turning volumes. This was determined in consultation with the City of Miami. The southbound traffic percent right -turn for Brickell Avenue at SE 13t' Street in 1995 was found to be high because of construction and closure of the Brickell Bridge. To address this, the count station (Station #86) located at SE 13t' Street immediately west of Brickell Avenue was looked into for its westbound traffic volume data. This data was used to balance westbound volume along SE 13`' Street with the intersection's turning volumes as calculated above. In other words, the 1996 Brickell Avenue southbound right -turn volume was calculated by subtracting from Station #86 westbound traffic the 1996 PM peak northbound left -turn and westbound through traffic. The Brickell Bayfront Club study established that the natural annual traffic growth rate for the Brickell area was two percent. Therefore, the 1997 existing traffic volumes for the study area intersections were determined by increasing the 1996 traffic volume by 2%. The 1997 existing traffic volumes are shown in Figure 3. 2.3 EXISTING SIGNAL TIMING PLANS Existing signal timing plans for the signalized intersections identified in the study area were obtained from the Dade County Traffic Control Center. The timing plans were used in analyzing existing levels of service. Existing signal timings are shown in Appendices 2 and 3. 2.4 EXISTING CAPACITY AND LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) Roadway capacity is the maximum number of vehicles that can pass a given•point during a specific period under prevailing roadway, traffic, and control conditions. The Metro -Dade County Traffic Engineering Department also adopts the roadway capacity as the service volume at level of service Terremark Brickell II - Traffic Impact Study October 31, 1997 Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. Page 7 Figure 3: 1997 Traffic Volume Terremark Brickell II - Traffic Impact Study October 31, 1997 Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. Page 8 "E." The level of service (LOS) is a qualitative measure that characterizes operational conditions within a traffic stream and their perception by motorists and passengers. The 1994 Highway Capacity Manual defines six levels of service, with LOS "A " representing the best operating conditions and LOS "F" representing the worst. The existing level of service for roadway segments and intersections were calculated according to the HCM procedure using the SIG/CINEMA software. The LOS for arterial was calculated using the FDOT ART -TAB program. As per the ART -TAB analysis shown in Appendix 4 and the 1995 Florida Generalized LOS Tables, the roadway capacities within the study area are 4,170 vehicles per hour (VPH) for Brickell Avenue and 3,160 VPH for SE 13`f' Street (Coral Way). The summary of existing LOS for roadway segments within the study area during the PM peak -hour is shown in Figure 4. Detailed LOS analyses are shown in Appendices 2, 3, and 4. The City of Miami transportation concurrency standards are based on the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan (MCNP). This document sets the roadway LOS at "E" within the City of Miami in general. However, the Downtown Miami roadways are governed under Special Transportation Area (STA), which allows for 20% of signalized intersections within the Downtown Miami DRI area (within STA) to operate below LOS "E." The intersection of SE 136 Street & Brickell Avenue is operating below LOS "E" for the 1997 conditions. This, in large part, is due to permissive only phase for northbound left turn and not sufficient green time available for westbound through movement. As for arterial analysis, northbound as well as southbound traffic of Brickell Avenue is operating at good levels of service, LOS "C" and LOS `B," respectively. This is due to sufficient green time (g/C) for through movements along Brickell Avenue at both signalized intersections. 2.5 TRANSIT ROUTES AND STATIONS The project area is served by Metromover which has a station located on SE 14`' Street and is 5 to 10 minutes walking distance from the proposed development. Also Brickell Avenue is served by bus routes B, 48, and 24. Each Metromover car has a capacity of 75 persons and each Metrobus has Terremark Brickell II - Traffic Impact Study October 31, 1997 Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. Page 9 Figure 4: 1997 LOS Terremark Brickell II - Traffic Impact Study October 31, 1997 Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. Page 10 seating capacity of 40 persons. Currently, the City of Miami is using 150% of seated capacity for Metrobuses as LOS standard. Metromover runs at headways of 3 minutes during peak hours and 5 minutes during off peak periods. Metrobus routes run at headways ranging from 15-60 minutes during peak hours to 30-60 minutes during off peak periods. This extensive transit network within the vicinity of the development is of great importance for future residents, employees and visitors to the development who would have an excellent access to transit services. This will decrease the impact of the development on the study area roadways as people would have access to transit services and could use them instead of private automobiles. Terremark Brickell II - Traffic Impact Study October 31, 1997 Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. Page 11 3. TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS AND IMPACTS 3. 1 TRIP GENERATION The Terremark Brickell II project proposed plan is to establish hotel, retail, drive -through bank, office, and residential developments as described in Table 1 of Section 1. The Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Trip Generation Manual 5`h Edition was used to determine the number of PM peak -hour trips that would be generated by the proposed project. The PM peak period is more critical than the AM peak in Downtown Miami area due to heavy commute pattern; therefore, traffic analysis was conducted for the PM peak period. A Metromover station at Brickell Avenue and SW 141h Street is adjacent to the project site, within 5 to 10 minutes walking -distance. Brickell Avenue is well served by the Metrobus routes, as discussed before. The 1989 Downtown Miami Master Plan estimated the transit ridership for the Brickell area to be approximately 10 percent. Because the proposed project is a multi -use development some of the trips generated by this project would be internal to the site. The ITE Trip Generation Manual allows for the reduction of trip generation rates to account for the multi -use development capture rates. The ITE Manual further suggests using higher capture rates for central business districts (CBD) to account for internal, transit, pass -by, and walking trips. These factors were applied to calculate the net external trip generation impacts. The FDOT Planning Division, District VI most recently suggested particular internal capture rates for the Brickell Square project, which is located just south of SE 13'h Street and is in close proximity to the proposed Terremark Brickell II project site. The Brickell Square project is also a multi -use development that contains hotel, residential, retail, and office developments. Since both projects are in the same area and have similar types of developments, therefore, the capture rates suggested by the FDOT for Brickell Square project were used for the proposed Terremark Brickell II project. These capture rates are summarized in Table 2. Terremark Brickell II - Traffic Impact Study October 31, 1997 Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. Page 12 Table 2: Terremark Brickell II Capture Rates Land Use % Internal I % Transit % Pass -By %Walking I Total Percents e Retail") 10 5 10 2 27 Office(') 0 10 0 0 10 Hotel') 5 5 0 0 10 Residential( 0 5 0 0 5 Bank(') 0 0 0 0 0 (1) Canture rates factors were sueeested by the FDOT Planning, Office_ District VT fnr the Brickell Snnare nrniect (2) Bank was not part of the Brickell Square project and, therefore, there was no capture rates associated with it. A zero capture rate was assumed for Terremark Brickell II project. The net external trips that the proposed project would generate are calculated for each land use by subtracting the total capture trips (as per Table 2) from the total trips generated as per the ITE Trip Generation Manual. A summary of net the external trips of the proposed project is shown in Table 3. The bank element of the proposed project is a drive -through only without walk-in services. The ITE Manual does not provide trip generation rates for banks with drive -through only services. Therefore, traffic counts at a similar facility, the Florida International Bank in Coconut Grove were obtained. At Florida International Bank drive -through facility with two lanes, 140 vehicles per day are generated on a typical day with a peak -hour during lunch time. Information about the PM peak -hour traffic volume at Florida International Bank facility was not available. As per the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 5' Edition, the ratio of the PM peak -hour trips to the daily trips (K-Factor) generated by a drive-in bank is approximately 15 percent. As such, the PM peak -hour trip generation for the drive -through bank service was calculated to be 21 vehicles per hour. The resultant PM peak hour inbound and outbound trips were 221 and 487 respectively as shown in Table 3. Terremark Brickell II - Traffic Impact Study October 31, 1997 Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. Page 13 Table 3: Terremark Brickell II Project Trip Generation(') %,I �O Fa ulc I x a 111r auvli 1viauuai, .) L:.u1uV11, 1771. (2) Net external trips = Total trips x (1 - Capture Rate) (3) Number of trips generated by the bank drive -through lanes were estimated from a traffic count conducted at a similar type facility where two-lane drive -through bank windows generated 140 vehicles per day. The ITE Trip Generation Manual reports that the average PM peak -hour to daily trip ratio (K-Factor) for banks with drive-in is approximately 15 percent. 3.2 TRIP DISTRIBUTION Metropolitan Dade County, Public Works Department maintains historical data trends on directional trip distribution for locations within the county, referred to as "Cardinal Trip Distribution. " The quadrants are divided into eight directions: NNE, ENE, ESE, SSE, SSW, WSW, WNW, and NNW. The Cardinal Trip Distribution (CTD) provides percentages of trips originated at each Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) to every one of the above directions. The proposed project lies within Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) 670. The cardinal trip distributions for TAZ 670 were NNE =19%, ENE = 4%, ESE = 0%, SSE =1%, SSW = 2%, WSW = 23%, WNW = 21%, and NNW = 30. Dividing this into four quadrants yields to the following distributions: north = 49%, east = 4%, south = 3%, and west 44%. Brickell Bayfront Club study, which is located in the same TAZ and analyzed the same study area, distributed project trips based on CTD. Therefore, the same trip distribution percentages were used Terremark Brickell II - Traffic Impact Study Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. October 31, 1997 Page 14 for this study as well. Trip distribution percentages and number of trips within the study area are shown in Figures 5 and 6, respectively. 3.3 BACKGROUND TRAFFIC The project's study area (Brickell) is within the Downtown Miami DRI boundaries and is well built out. Therefore, limited traffic growth is expected in this area. The Brickell Bayfront Club study established a 2% annual growth rate for the same study area, which is relatively high for such a built out area. A conservative approach was followed and a 2% annual growth rate was used for this study to project future traffic volumes. The project's opening year is 2000. Therefore, the projected PM peak hour traffic volume for the study area was calculated as follows: V012000 — Vo11997 X (I + 0.02)3 3.4 COMMITTED TRAFFIC IMPACT In Downtown Miami Brickell area there are other developments previously approved but not yet completed. One such development is Fortune House, adjacent to the proposed project site (as shown in Figure 7). It has a direct contribution to the proposed project impact. At the present time, this project is under construction and is expected to be open by early 1998. The Brickell Bayfont Club project trips, as distributed in 1995 report, were added to the year 2000 background trips. The year 2000 PM peak hour background plus committed trips are shown in Figure 7. The impacts of background and committed PM peak hour traffic were analyzed according to the HCM procedures using SIG/CINEMA and FDOT LOS Software. It was found that the intersection of Brickell Avenue and SE 13' Street would operate at LOS "F" while the intersection of Brickell r Avenue and SE 15`h Road would operate at LOS `B" with the existing (1997) signal Terremark Brickell II - Traffic Impact Study October 31, 1997 Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. Page 15 Figure 5: Terremark Brickell II - Traffic Impact Study October 31, 1997 Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. Page 16 Figure 6: Terremark Brickell II - Traffic Impact Study October 31, 1997 Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. Page 17 timing plans. The operating level of service for northbound Brickell Avenue between SE 15" Road and SE 13' Street would be LOS "C" and for southbound Brickell Avenue between SE 13t' Street and SE 15`' Road the LOS would be `B." The resulting future intersections and arterial levels of service are shown in Figure 8. Detailed intersections and arterial LOS analyses are included in Appendices 5, 6 and 7. 3.5 PROGRAMMED AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS The 1997 Metro -Dade Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), the 2015 Metro -Dade Transportation Plan Long Range Element, and the 1996 Metro -Dade Transit Development Program were reviewed to identify any programmed or planned projects within the study area that may have an impact related to the scope of the proposed project. The above documents showed no programmed or planned projects within the study area. 3.6 PROJECT'S TRANSPORTATION IMPACTS The proposed development is expected to be open in early year 2000. Future traffic conditions of background plus committed plus project traffic conditions were calculated, as shown in Figure 9. These volumes were then used to determine intersection and link level of service. At the present time and without project impacts, traffic operation conditions at the intersection of Brickell Avenue and SE 13`h Street are within the City of Miami standards. However, as previously noted, two the intersection movements were operating at LOS "F." Therefore, signal timing optimization analysis was performed for both intersections using the SIG/CINEMA program. Then, a link analysis along Brickell Avenue for the optimized signal timing was performed using the 1995 FDOT ART -TAB Program. Appendices 5, 6 and 7 contain intersection and arterial analyses for future background plus committed plus project traffic conditions. Summary of intersections and links LOS results are shown in Figure 10. The analysis showed that the intersection of Brickell Avenue and SE 15' Road with its current signal timing is operating at the optimum. Minimum green time (7 seconds) is provided for cross street Terremark Brickell II - Traffic Impact Study October 31, 1997 Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. Page 18 Figure 7: Background and committed trip volume. Terremark Brickell II - Traffic Impact Study October 31, 1997 Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. Page 19 Figure S: BG + Com LOS Terremark Brickell II - Traffic Impact Study October 31, 1997 Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. Page 20 Figure 9: BG+C+P Terremark Brickell II - Traffic Impact Study October 31, 1997 Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. Page 21 Figure 10: LOS Terremark Brickell II - Traffic Impact Study October 31, 1997 Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. Page 22 traffic (along SE 15'hRoad), which carries minimal traffic volume. The remaining green time within a cycle (98 seconds) is provided for Brickell Avenue, which carries the majority of traffic. The intersection would operate at LOS `B," as shown in Figure 10. The analysis also showed that the intersection of Brickell Avenue and SE 13'' Street with its current signal timing is not operating at its optimum. Therefore, the signal timing and phasing at the intersection of Brickell Avenue and SE 13' Street were changed to develop the optimal setting to maximize turning movements throughput without adversely impacting the progression and LOS along Brickell Avenue. Due to the heavy northbound left -turn volume (463 VPH) along Brickell Avenue at SE 13'hStreet, an exclusive (protected) left turn phase was added to reduce movement's excessive delay. Signal analysis details are included in Appendices 5 and 6. The eastbound and westbound approaches (SE 13t' Street/SE 12' Terrace) would, however, operate at LOS "F." The intersection overall LOS would be "F," as shown in Figure 10. As for level of service along Brickell Avenue, the ART -TAB analysis showed that the northbound traffic would be operating at LOS "D" and the southbound traffic would be operating at LOS `B," as presented in Figure 10. 3.7 SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS AT SE 14TH TERRACE AND BRICKELL AVENUE Trip distribution analysis showed that the majority of trips generated by both the Brickell Bayfront Club project and the proposed project (Terremark Brickell II) would use SE 10 Terrace as the main access road. This will result in a high southbound left -turn volume and a high westbound right- turn volume conflicting with Brickell Avenue's through traffic volume, which is also high. Summary of the PM peak hour turning volumes and lane configurations at the intersection of SE.14' Terrace and Brickell Avenue is shown in Figure 11. There are two issues associated with the accommodation of southbound left -turn volumes. The first is to accommodate their storage and the second is to have sufficient number and amount of gaps in the opposing northbound Brickell Avenue traffic. The availability of gaps, together with the rate of Terremark Brickell II - Traffic Impact Study October 31, 1997 Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. Page 23 Figure 11: Terremark Brickell II - Traffic Impact Study October 31, 1997 Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. Page 24 arrival of the southbound left -turn traffic, will impact the operating queue for left -turn traffic, and its consequential impact on the southbound through traffic along Brickell Avenue. Since there are no left -turn signal warrant analysis methodologies recommended by the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) and FDOT, it is appropriate to make a determination of left -turn signal necessity based on the knowledge of field operation conditions and roadway geometry in place. Investigation of traffic operations at the above -mentioned intersection indicated that there is a need to control the turning vehicles by a traffic signal. This signal will facilitate processing the high volume of left -turn from Brickell Avenue and right -turn from SE 14`' Terrace. Signal design analysis at this intersection was performed to determine signal phasing and timing and to ensure compliance with the FDOT policy of maintaining progression along Brickell. Detailed analysis of signal timing and phasing are included in Appendix 8. The existing left -turn lane at Brickell Avenue has an approximate storage of 100 feet, which can provide storage for up to five vehicles. An analysis was performed using TRAF-NETSIM simulation model to estimate the maximum and average queue lengths and storage length needed for Brickell Avenue southbound left -turn lane. The analysis showed that to maintain the maximum left -turn queue length to five vehicles or less, a long (more than 40 seconds) protective left turn phase should be provided. However, to maintain good progression and increase bandwidth for Brickell Avenue northbound traffic, the length of the left -turn lane was increased to 150 feet, which can accommodate up to eight vehicles. Signal phase timing based on the new length was then recalculated. The simulation analysis showed that providing a 24 second protective left -turn phase will maintain the maximum queue length of eight vehicles, with the average maximum queue length of six vehicles. Summary of SIG/CINEMA and TRAF-NETSIM results are included in Appendix 8. The analysis showed that the overall intersection would operate at LOS `B" and approaches LOS would operate from LOS "B" to "E," which is within the City of Miami transportation concurrencytlimits. Terremark Brickell II - Traffic Impact Study October 31, 1997 Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. Page 25 4. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS • The proposed project is located in Brickell area of Downtown Miami. The proposed development has 246 hotel rooms, 44 residential units, 372,799 square feet of office space, 18,822 square feet of gross retail area, and two-lane drive -through only service bank, in addition to a six -story parking garage and one floor recreational facilities. • The Brickell Bayfront Club project (currently known as Fortune House), which is currently under construction and will be open by early 1998, is in the immediate vicinity to the project site. This project contributes directly to the transportation impact of the proposed project. Therefore, the Brickell Bayfront Club project was considered in this analysis as a committed development. • Inventory of the existing physical and operational conditions within the study area related to the scope of this project has been collected from the Metro -Dade County, Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), and field visits. The study area roadways and intersection PM peak hour traffic volumes were determined from FDOT traffic count stations and from Brickell Bayfront Club study report, 1995, which was in consultation with the City of Miami. The project is. expected to be operational in January, 2000. A conservative 2% annual traffic growth rate was used for the study area. • Analysis of PM peak hour existing traffic conditions for signalized intersections and roadway links within the study area showed that, except for northbound left -turn traffic along Brickell Avenue at SE 13' Street, all other approach movements and roadways would operate within the City of Miami transportation concurrency limits (LOS "E"). The intersection of Brickell Avenue and SE 15`h Road would operate at level of service (LOS) "A" and the intersection of Brickell Avenue and SE 13'' Street would operate at LOS "F" which is still within the City of Miami transportation concurrency limits (up to 20% of signalized intersections to operate below LOS "E"). Brickell Avenue northbound would operate at LOS "C" and Brickell Avenue southbound would operate at LOS `B." Terremark Brickell II - Traffic Impact Study October 31, 1997 Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. Page 26 • The Terremark Brickell II proposed project would generate a net external traffic of approximately 6,254 vehicles per day and 708 vehicles per PM peak -hour, which is the critical period. The PM peak -hour inbound/outbound percent split was calculated to be 31 /69. • The proposed project's vehicular trips were distributed according to the Brickell Bayfront Club study which was based on the "Cardinal Trip Distribution " provided by Metropolitan Dade County Public Works Department and access constraints. • Future analysis with background plus committed development plus proposed project traffic showed that signal timing and phasing at Brickell Avenue and SE 13' Street need to be optimized to improve traffic conditions at this intersection and reduce northbound excessive delay. As such, the signal phasing at this intersection was optimized, and the existing three- phase signal was modified to a four -phase signal as shown in Appendix 6. The optimized signal timing plan would significantly improve traffic operation along Brickell Avenue (up to LOS "D" and "E" compared to LOS "B" and "F") as well as the overall intersection (up to LOS E+20% compared to LOS E+371%). • Trip distribution analysis showed that SE 14`h Terrace provides the major access roadway from Brickell -Avenue to both Terremark Brickell II and Fortune House projects. This would result in a high southbound Brickell Avenue left -turn volume and a high westbound SE 14`' Terrace right -turn volume at the intersection of Brickell Avenue and SE I e Terrace. There are no left -turn volume signal warrants recommended by the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) or FDOT. However, because of the limited availability of gaps in the northbound Brickell Avenue high volume traffic, together with the high rate of arrival of the southbound Brickell Avenue left -turn traffic, it was determined that a new traffic signal at this intersection is needed. TRAF-NETSIM analysis was conducted at this intersection to determine the left turn lane storage length to prevent spill back along Brickell Avenue. The TRAF-NETSIM analysis indicated that a 150 feet length is needed to provide sufficient storage length to the southbound left turn traffic and to keep a good progression Terremark Brickell II - Traffic Impact Study October 31, 1997 Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. Page 27 for northbound Brickell Avenue traffic. Terremark Brickell II - Traffic Impact Study October 31, 1997 Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. Page 28 5. APPENDICES Appendix 1: Brickell Bayfront Club Project PM Peak Hour Traffic Volume. Appendix 2: Intersection of Brickell Avenue and SE 15`h Road - SIG/CINEMA Analysis for 1997 Existing Conditions. Appendix 3: Intersection of Brickell Avenue and SE 13`h Street - SIG/CINEMA Analysis for 1997 Existing Conditions. Appendix 4: FDOT ART -TAB Analysis for 1997 Existing Conditions. Appendix 5: Intersection of Brickell Avenue and SE 15`h Road - SIG/CINEMA Analysis for Year 2000 Traffic Conditions. Appendix 6: Intersection of Brickell Avenue and SE 13" Street - SIG/CINEMA Analysis for Year 2000 Traffic Conditions. Appendix 7: FDOT ART -TAB Analysis for Year 2000 Traffic Conditions. Appendix 8: Intersection of Brickell Avenue and SE 14`h Terrace - SIG/CINEMA and TRAF- NETSIM Analysis for Year 2000 Traffic Conditions. Appendix 9: AADT Trends Within the Study Area Between 1993 and 1996. f \... \brkl tennrk\report-update.traf.wpd Terremark Brickell II - Traffic Impact Study Bermello,•Ajamil & Partners, Inc. October 31, 1997 Page 29 Appendix 1: Brickell Bayfront Club Project PM Peak Hour Traffic Volume. 7 (L)' Shared left turn lane (R)** Shared right turn lane FIGURE 3 1995 EXISTING VOLUMES FOR P.M. PEAK HOUR BERMELLO, AJAMIL & PARTNERS, INC. BRICKELL BAY FRONT CLUB APRIL 1995 Appendix Z: Intersection of Brickell Avenue and SE 15`b Road - SIG/CINEMA Analysis for 1997 Existing Conditions. 0 HCM Surmary Resu"-,� for Case: EXT15RD1 SE 15TP "D /BRICKED AVE SE 15TH RD @ BR Iu..r3.L WE, NO PEDS 1997 Exstng Pt i PEAL( Val Version 1.0 - Lane Grp - - App - Delay L Delay L Z034 1 Lane X (see/ 0 (sec/ 0 3 44 Grp v/s v/c Leh) S veh) S EB LTR 6.04 0.44 33.0 D 33.0 D L 13 4 — 43 34 WB LTR *8.85 0.57 35.5 D 35.5 D _________ -- --------- 15� 43 —' NB L 0.40 0.45 3.0 A 1.2 A 45 i TR 0.37 0.43 1.1 A 48 51 i 965 SB L 0.24 0.28 1.1 A 3.6 A 1 i��. 2 . TR *8.71 8.81 3.7 A +ili�4 98 1 7 4 1 Int. 0.76 0.79 4.7 A SIG/Cinema V1.0 ORGANIZATION: B & A PAr,fNERS, INC. SE 15TH RD O BRICKELL AVE, NO PEDS SE 15TH RD /BRICKELL AVE Page-1 **************************************************************************** IDENTIFYING INFORMATION EAST APPROACH: SE 15TH RD NORTH APPROACH: BRICKELL AVE WEST APPROACH: SE 15TH RD SOUTH APPROACH: BRICKELL AVE ANALYST: Khaled Al-Sahili ANALYSIS DATE: 7/29/97 ANALYSIS PERIOD: PM PEAK BACKGROUND CASE: EXT15RD1 INTERSECTION GEOMETRY LANE LEFT TURN RIGHT TURN APPROACH OUTBOUND LENGTH ----POCKET--- ----POCKET--- APP. LANES LANES (FEET) LANES ----- (FEET) LANES (FEET) ------ ----- ------ ---- EB ----- 2 ----- 2 ------ 600 0 0 0 0 WB 2 2 400 0 0 0 0 NB 3 2 600 1 100 0 0 SB 3 2 600 1 100 0 0 MOVEMENTS SERVICED BY LANE AND LANE WIDTHS(FEET) LANE 1 LANE 2 LANE 3 LANE 4 LANE 5 LANE 6 APP. MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH MOV. WIDTH ------------------------------ ---- EB ---------- LT 12.0 ---------- TR 12.0 ---------- WB LT 9.0 TR 9.0 NB L 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 SB L 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 L - EXCLUSIVE LEFT TURN T - EXCLUSIVE THROUGH LT - LEFT TURN /,THROUGH TR - THROUGH / RIGHT TURN LR - LEFT TURN / RIGHT TURN R - EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TURN LTR - LEFT TURN / THROUGH / RIGHT TURN TRAFFIC VOLUMES CURRENT TRAFFIC VOLUMES (VPH) GROWTH FACTORS APP. ----------------------------- LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR -------------- LEFT THRU RIGHT ---- EB ---- 15 ---- 43 ----- 45 ---- 10 ---- 1.00 ---- 1.00 ----- 1.00 WB 34 43 13 0 1.00- 1.00 1.00 NB 48 965 51 10 1.00 1.00 1.00 SB 44 2034 43 20- 1.00 1.00 1.00 MOVEMENT VOLUMES (VPH) PEAK HOUR FACTORS APP. LEFT THRU RIGHT RTOR LEFT THRU RIGHT ---- EB ---- 15 ---- 43 ----- 45 ---- 10 ---- 0.85 ---- 0.85 ----- 0.85 WB 34 43 13 0 0.85 0.85 0.85 NB 48 965 51 10 0.90 0.90 0.90 SB 44 2034 43 20 0.96 0.96 0.96 SIG/Cinema V1.0 ORGANIZATION: B & A P' 'NERS, INC. SE 15TH RD @ BRICKELL AV-, NO PEDS SE 15TH RD ,BRICKELL AVE Page-2 SIGNAL SETTINGS - OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS CONTROL TYPE : SEMI -ACTUATED PHASING: MOVEMENTS SERVICED APP, 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB LTP V1B LTP NB LTP SB LTP L=Left Turn; T=Through; R=Right, no Peds; P=Right w Ped conflict TIMING BY PHASE (SECONDS) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 --- 8 --- --- Green 98.0 --- 7.0 --- 0.0 --- 0.0 --- 0.0 --- 0.0 0.0 0.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 All Red 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 DURATION OF PEDESTRIAN ONLY PHASE (SECS) 0 CYCLE LENGTH (SECS) 115.0 LOST TIME PER PHASE (SECS) 2.0 TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY CONDITIONS AREA TYPE - CBD EAST WEST NORTH SOUTH L T R L T R L T R L T R --- --- --- --- --- HEAVY VEHICLES 0 0 0 --- --- --- 0 0 0 --- --- 0 --- 2 0 --- 0 2 0 PLATOON ARRIVAL TYPE 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 EAST WEST NORTH SOUTH CONFLICTING PEDESTRIANS/HOUR 50 50 50 50 PERCENT GRADE 0 0 0 0 CURB PARKING N Y Y Y NUMBER OF PARKING MANEUVERS/HOUR 0 20 20 20 NUMBER OF BUSES STOPPING/HOUR 0 0 0 0 PEDESTRIAN BUTTON N N N N MINIMUM GREEN TIME FOR PEDESTRIANS 20.0 20.0 15.9 15.9 SIG/Cinema V1.0 - ORGANIZATION: B & A P7 'NERS, INC. SE 15TH RD 0 BRICKELL AVL NO PEDS SE 15TH RD ,.�RICKELL AVE Page-3 **************************************************************************** VOLUME ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET v v P g Peak Lane U v Current Mvt Mvt Group Lane Adj. Vol Growth Vol Flow Lane Flow N Util Flow Proportion App Mvt (vph) Factor ------ (vph) ----- PHF --- (vph) ----- Grp. (vph) Lns ---- ----- --- Fact ---- (vph) ----- LT ---- RT ---- --- EB --- L ----- 15 1.00 15 0.85 18 LTR 110 2 1.05 115 0.16 0.37 T 43 1.00 43 0.85 51 R 45 1.00 45 0.85 41+ WB L 34 1.00 34 0.85 40 LTR 106 2 1.05 111 0.38 0.14 T 43 1.00 43 0.85 51 R 13 1.00 13 0.85 15 NB L 48 1.00 48 0.90 53 L 53 1 1.00 53 1.00 0.00 T 965 1.00 965 0.90 1072 TR 1118 2 1.05 1174 0.00 0.04 R 51 1.00 51 0.90 46+ SB L 44 1.00 44 0.96 46 L 46 1 1.00 46 1.00 0.00 T 2034 1.00 2034 0.96 2119 TR 2143 2 1.05 2250 0.00 0.01 R 43 1.00 43 0.96 24+ + RTOR volume not included SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET s Ideal Lane Heavy Bus Area Right Left Adj. Lane Sat. N Width Veh Grade Pkg. Block Type Turn Turn Sat. App Group Flow Lanes f f f f f f f f Flow w HV g p bb a RT LT vphg --- EB ----- ---- LTR 1900 --- 2 ----- ---- 1.000 1.00 ----- 1.000 ---- ---- 1.00 1.00 ---- .900 ---- .935 ---- .898 ---- 2872 WB LTR 1900 2 0.900 1.00 1.000 .900 1.00 .900 .975 .786 2123 NB L 1900 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 .9b0 1.00 .076 130 TR 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 .900 1.00 .900 .993 1.00 2995 SB L 1900 1 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 ..900 1.00 .097 166 TR 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 .900 1.00 .900 .998 1.00 3010 SIG/Cinema V1.0 ORGANIZATION: B & A F TNERS, INC. SE 15TH RD @ BRICKELL A'� NO PEDS SE 15TH RD ,BRICKELL AVE Page-4 **************************************************************************** WORKSHEET FOR PERMITTED LEFT TURNS OPPOSED BY A MULTI -LANE APPROACH EB WB NB SE Cycle Length C, (sec) 115 115 115 115 Actual Green, G 7.0 7.0 98.0 98.0 Effective Green, g (sec) 10.0 10.0 101.0 101.0 Opposing Effective Green, go 10.0 10.0 101.0 101.0 Number of Lanes, N 2 2 1 1 Opposing Lanes, No 2 2 2 2 Adjusted Left -Turn Flow Rate, vLT 18 40 53 46 Proportion of LT, PLT 0.16 0.38 1.00 1.00 Opposing Flow Rate, vo (vph) ill 115 2250 1174 Lost Time Per Phase, tL 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Left Turns per Cycle, LTC=vLT*C/3600 0.57 1.28 1.69 1.47 Opp Flow (/Ln/Cycle), volc=vo*C/(3600*No) 1.77 1.84 35.94 18.75 Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 gf=G**(-0.860*LTC**.629)-tL, gf<=g 1.87# 0.45# 0.00 0.00 Opp. Queue Ratio, qro=1-Rpo*(go/C) 0.91 0.91 0.12 0.12 gq 1.34 1.46 21.33 4.77 gu=g-gq (if gq<=gf then gu=g-gf) 8.13 8.54 79.67 96.23 fs=(875-.625*vo)/1000, fs>=0 0.81 0.80 0.00 0.14 PL=PLT [1+((N-1) *g/ (fs*gu+4 . 5)) ] 0.31 0.71 1.00 1.00 EL1 1.52 1.54 10.40 9.85 fmin=2*(1+PL)/g 0.26 0.34 0.04 0.04 fm= [gf/g] + [gu/g] [1/ (I+PL (EL1-1)) ] 0.89 0.66 0.08 0.10 fLT = [fm + .91 * (N-1)] / N 0.90 0.79 0.06 0.10 # gf for Multi -Lane SIG/Cinema V1.0 - ORGANIZATION: B & A P7 NERS, INC. SE 15TH RD @ BRICKELL AVE, NO PEDS SE 15TH RD ,.6RICKELL AVE Page-5 **************************************************************************** CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEET ---------------------------- v s v/s g/C c X Lane Adj Flow Adj Sat Flow Green Capacity v/c App. Group (vph) (vphg) Ratio Ratio (vph) Ratio ---- ----- ----- ------ ----- ------------------------------- EB LTR 115 2872 0.04 0.09 250 0.46 WB * LTR 111 2123 0.05 0.09 185 0.60 NB L 53 130 0.41 0.88 114 0.46 TR 1174 2995 0.39 0.88 2630 0.45 SE L 46 166 0.28 0.88 146 0.32 * TR 2250 3010 0.75 0.88 2644 0.85 * Critical Lane Group Sum (v/s)crit = 0.80 Xc = 0.83 Cycle Length, C = 115 Sec Lost Time Per Cycle, L = 4.0 Sec LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEET ----- Delay 1 ------ --- Delay 2 --- -Ln Grp - -- App -- X g/C. di DF c m d2 Delay Delay Lane v/c Green (sec Adj. Cap Calib (sec (sec (sec App Grp. ---- Ratio ----- Ratio ----- /veh) ----- Fact ---- (vph) ----- Param ----- /veh) ----- /veh) LOS ----- --- /veh) LOS ----- --- --- EB LTR 0.46 0.09 37.9 0.85 250 16.0 1.0 33.2 D 33.2 D WB LTR 0.60 0.09 38.4 0.85 185 16.0 3.8 36.4 D 36.4 D NB L 0.46 0.88 TR 0.45 0.88 SE L 0.32 0.88 TR 0.85 0.88 1.1 1.00 114 16.0 2.2 3.3 A 1.2 A 1.1 1.00 2630 16.0 0.1 1.1 A 0.9 1.00 146 16.0 0.4 1.3 A 4.5 A 2.6 1.00 2644 16.0 2.1 4.6 A Intersection Cycle = 115 Sec 5.3 B Appendix 3: Intersection of Brickell Avenue and SE 13' Street - SIG/CINEMA. Analysis for 1997 Existing Conditions. HCH Suimary Resu1+� for _Case: EXT13-ST SE 13TH ^T /BRICMI AVE SE 13TH STREET Q _A CKELL AVENUE 1997 Exstng h. ?eaX Vol Uersion 1.8 - Lane Grp - - App - t Delay L Delay L Lane X (sec/ 0 (sec/ 0 4 24 t It Grp v/s v/c veh) S veh) S 32 EB L 0.85 0.38 32.9 D 36.2 D t i 4- 316 LT *B.18 0.66 38.8 D tlt{� ttt ► t r-- 83 R 0.84 0.25 32.5 D -------- --------- WB L 0.05 0.32 32.4 D - F -.=tom T *8.19 1.15 - - -------- --------- R 0.02 8.18 31.8 D 187 t i� KB L *1.76 2.89 - - - F i 64 -71, TR 0.14 8.23 6.1 B t t ► 236 21 t 453 SB L 0.85 0.87 5.4 B 8.7 B 1 J 3 .. T 6.40 0.64 9.2 Bt- R 0.14 0.22 6.8 B 69 4 1 1� 4 1 16 4 1 Int . 2.05 2.16 - F TERREMARK BRICKELL II SITE STUDY SUBMITTED TO: CITY OF MIAMI PREPARED FOR: TERREMARK BRICKELL II PARTNERSHIP PREPARED BY: BERMELLO, AJAmuL & PARTNERS, INC. OCTOBER 31,1997 1. DRAINAGE 1.1 GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS The proposed development is located on a site abutting Brickell Avenue to the West, SE 14' Terrace to the North, and SE 14' Lane to the South. The site has a net area of 3.74 acres. The site is presently vacant except for two houses on the frontage to Brickell Avenue. After development, approximately 85% of the site will be impervious, and 15% will remain as pervious areas. Storm water discharge from the proposed developed area will consist primarily of building roofs, driveways and landscape areas runoff. It is not anticipated any change in the existing discharge and drainage system on the public right-of-way. 1.2 OFF -SITE DRAINAGE SYSTEM The City of Miami presently maintains a roadway drainage system for all the abutting roads with the site. Because the site is presently almost undeveloped, it does not contribute any significant amount of storm water runoff to this drainage system. The proposed development will be designed with total on -site retention of storm water runoff, and no changes on the right-of-way storm water discharge. We estimate that the existing roadway drainage system is of sufficient capacity to handle the pre -development and post -development conditions. 1.3 ON -SITE DRAINAGE SYSTEM. A MSSW General Permit will be required for this development due to the size and percentage of imperviousness of the site. Under this permit it will be required to match pre -development and post - development conditions for a 100-year, 3-day storm event with no discharge. Total on -site retention is required for all other storm events up to 25-year. Terremark Brickell II - Site Study October 31, 1997 Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. Page 1 The drainage system for the proposed development will provide total on -site retention of storm water runoff, no off -site runoff is anticipated from the development. Due to the existing conditions of low back -of -sidewalk elevations, high ground water table, and proximity to Biscayne Bay, deep injection drainage wells will be required for the storm water runoff disposal. Wells will be designed to handle the peak runoff volumes, and will be tested for the required capacity and water quality parameters as they are installed. Storm water will be collected through a system of catch basin inlets and conveyed to the well locations. Runoff from driving surfaces and parking areas will be routed to detention structures for quality pre-treatment prior to flowing into the wells. 1.4 DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS. 1.4.1 Peak Runoff Total Area Impervious (85%) Pervious (15%) Weighted Runoff Coefficient Design Storm Time of Concentration Rainfall Intensity Peak Runoff (Q=C.i.A) 1.4.2 Well Calculations 3.74 Ac. 3.18 Ac. 0.56 Ac. C= (3.18x0.90 + 0.56x0.25)/3.74 = 0.80 10 years 15 minutes 6.2 in/hr Q= 0.80x6.20.74 = 18.55 cfs Assuming 24" diameter wells with capacities of 650 gpm/ft-head Terremark Brickell II - Site Study October 31, 1997 Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. Page 2 Average October G.W.L. Head Well Capacity Total wells required 1.4.3 Detention. 2.00 N.G.V.D. 3.00 ft Q = 650x3.00 = 1950 gpm = 4.34 cfs 18.55 cfs/4.34 cfs = 4.27 Say 5 Wells Provide 1-1/2 min (90 sec) detention time. Volume required 4.34 cfs x 90 sec = 390.60 cf Provide 5 tanks each with the following approximate dimensions: 6' wide x 7' deep x 10' long. For a total volume of 420 cf per tank. Terremark Brickell II - Site Study October 31, 1997 Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. Page 3 2. WATER DISTRIBUTION 2.1 MIAMI-DADE W.A.S.D. REQUIREMENTS Miami -Dade W.A.S.D. owns and operates a 20 inch water main located along Brickell Avenue, and a 6 inch / 4 inch loop along SE 14' Terrace and SE 14'hLane; there is also a 4 inch water main interconnecting both branches of the loop from SE 14'hTerrace to SE 14`' Lane. A new 12 inch water main is being presently installed on SE I e Terrace from Brickell Avenue to the East boundary of the Fortune House property. The developer will install a new 12 inch water main from the East boundary of the Fortune House property along SE 10 Terrace and SE 14`'' Lane to connect to the existing 20 inch main on Brickell Avenue. Additional fire hydrants will be installed from this new water main in order to provide adequate fire protection to the proposed development. The 4 inch water main interconnecting the loop from Se 14' Terrace to Se 14t' Lane will be abandoned. 2.2 WATER SERVICES Fire protection, domestic and irrigation water services will be installed from the new 12 inch water main, which is estimated to provide the required water demand of the development. 2.3 WATER DEMAND The anticipated water demand for this development are as follows: Residential: 40 Units @ 200 GPD/Unit ..................... 8,000 GPD Hotel: 246 Rooms @ 100 GPD/Room ..................... 24,600 GPD Office: 372,799 SF @ 10 GPD/100SF ..................... 37,280 GPD Terremark Brickell II - Site Study October 31, 1997 Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. Page 4 Retail: 18,822 SF @ 5 GPD/ 100SF ......................... 941 GPD Restaurant: 250 Seats @ 50 GPD/Seat ................... 12,500 GPD Bar: 115 Seats @15 GPD/Seat ......................... 1,725 GPD Banquet Hall: 780 Seats @ 25 GPD/Seat .................. 19,500 GPD Delicatessen: 90 Seats @ 35 GPD/Seat ..................... 3,150 GPD Total Water Demand ................................. 107,696 GPD Terremark Brickell II - Site Study October 31, 1997 Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. Page 5 3. SEWAGE COLLECTION 3.1 MIAMI-DADE W.A.S.D. REQUIREMENTS Miami -Dade W.A.S.D. owns and operates a 15 inch sanitary sewer main along SE 14`' Terrace from Brickell Avenue for approximately 170 feet to the West, and then running South through an easement on the property and crossing SE 14t' Lane. There are also 10 and 12 inch sanitary sewer mains on easements inside the property and running from SE 14' Terrace to the South crossing SE 14' Lane. As -built information for this area is very limited and more detailed investigations (survey) need to be performed. All sanitary sewer mains inside the property will be abandoned. Proper connection of the existing 15 inch main on SE 14'h Terrace should be provided. 3.2 SANITARY SERVICES Sanitary services will be provided for each individual tower, and connected to the existing sewer mains in the public right-of-way. 3.3 SEWAGE FLOWS From 2.3 we obtain the following sewage flows: Residential Hotel Office Average flow: 8,000 GPD / 6 GPM (Based on 18 Hrs/Day) Peak flow: 21 GPM (Based on 3.5 peak factor) Average flow: 24,600 GPD / 17 GPM (Based on 24 Hrs/Day) Peak flow: 77 GPM (Based on 4.5 peak factor) Average flow: 37,280 GPD / 26 GPM (Based on 12 Hrs/Day) Peak flow: 117 GPM (Based on 4.5 peak factor) Terremark Brickell II - Site Study October 31, 1997 Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. Page 6 Retail Average flow: 941 GPD / 0.7 GPM (Based on 12 Hrs/Day) Peak flow: 3.0 GPM (Based on 4.5 peak factor) Restaurant Average flow: 12,500 GPD / 9 GPM (Based on 12 Hrs/Day) Peak flow: 41 GPM (Based on 4.5 peak factor) Bar Average flow: 1,725 GPD / 1 GPM (Based on 12 Hrs/Day) Peak flow: 5 GPM (Based on 4.5 peak factor) Banquette Hall Average flow: 19,500 GPD / 14 GPM (Based on 12 Hrs/Day) Peak flow: 63 GPM (Based on 4.5 peak factor) Delicatessen Average flow: 3,150 GPD / 2 GPM (Based on 12 Hrs/Day) Peak flow: 9 GPM (Based on 4.5 peak factor) Total Sewage Flow Average: 107,696 GPD / 75 GPM Peak flow: 336 GPM h:\common\secrtry\myrtice\bricke112.wpd Terremark Brickell II - Site Study October 31, 1997 Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. Page 7 TERREMARK BRICKELL II ECONOMIC AND TAX IMPACT STUDY SUBMITTED TO: CITY OF MIAMI PREPARED FOR: TERREMARK BRICKELL H, LPD PREPARED BY: SHARPTON, BRUNSON & COMPANY, P.A. One Southeast Third Ave. Suite 2100 Miami, Florida 33131 (305) 374-1574 October 31, 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY OF BENEFITS INTRODUCTION, OBJECTIVE AND DEFINITIONS Introduction Objectives Definitions of Economic and Tax Impact Direct and Indirect Effects Measures of Economic Impact Description of Results THE PROJECT OVERVIEW DISCUSSION OF THE RESULTS OF THE ANALYSIS Impact Indicators Results of Indicators Impact of Construction Impact of Ongoing Operations Impact on Local Tax Revenues DISCUSSION OF THE RESULTS BY ECONOMIC INDICATOR Employment Wages Output Local Taxes OTHER CONSIDERATIONS Public Sector Cost Impact Fees SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS EXHIBITS Exhibit I: Summary of Economic Impact Exhibit II: Summary of all Direct Economic Benefits Exhibit III: Computation of Indirect Benefits Exhibit IV: Schedule of Project Development Cost Exhibit V: Schedule of Ad Valorem Taxes Exhibit VI: Allocation of Ad Valorem Taxes Exhibit VII: Impact and Other Fees PAGE 1 3 4 4 5 6 7 0 9 9 10 10 10 11 12 13 14 16 16 17 IF: SUMMARY OF BENEFITS Significant Community Benefits: 0 Jobs 0 Wages 0 Taxes 0 Economic Activity Resident, Visitor and Hotel Guest spending impacting to Local Businesses: 0 Food 0 Recreation/Entertainment 0 Transportation 0 Retail Terremark Brickell II - Economic Impact Study October 31, 1997 Chi.-..t.,.. ❑r......,... P_ n,.�____. T w _ _ SUMMARY OF ECONOMIC IMPACT (BENEFITS) The following table summarizes the economic impact of the Terremark Brickell II development: Construction Period Lmga.cj Annual Rmcu Economic Activity Stimulated: output $185,863,752 $21,237,120 Taxes 285,487 3,805,856 Wages 38,650,000 13,900,000 Total $224,799,239 $38,942,976 Jobs created 174 1 480 Terremark Brickell II - Economic Impact Study Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. October 31, 1997 Page 2 TERREMARK BRICKELL II INTRODUCTION, OBJECTIVES AND DEFINITIONS INTRODUCTION, OBJECTIVES AND DEFINITIONS Introduction This document represents an in-depth economic and tax benefits analysis of the development and operation of a first class hotel, modem luxury residencies, and an office complex located within a 3.74 acre (162,989.56 square feet) site along Brickell Avenue in downtown Miami, between SE 14th Terrace and SE 14th Lane on Brickell Avenue (the Project). The gross lot area is 222,854.12 square feet or 5.11 acres. The Project is a 38 story tower with three components; a five star, 246 room hotel, which spans the first 14 levels; a residential component, with 40 luxury units on the next 4 levels; and the following 20 levels house 372,788 square feet office development. The hotel will provide its guests with a ballroom, smaller meeting and board rooms, a fitness/spa center, and a hotel restaurant and bar among other amenities. The restaurant will have pedestrian access from Brickell as well as from the hotel. In addition, there will be retail space along Brickell Avenue, between 14th Terrace and 14th Lane. The Project includes a seven level parking structure with 963 parking spaces which supports the entire development. Six levels are for parking, and the seventh floor serves as the recreation deck which houses both indoor and outdoor amenities. The Project is designed in such a way that there is no exposure to the parking garage from the surrounding streets. This analysis encompasses the entire Project and estimates the economic and tax benefits for both its development and operational phases. Terremark Brickell II - Economic Impact Study October 31, 1997 Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. Page 3 INTRODUCTION, OBJECTIVES AND DEFINITIONS Objectives The objective of this analysis is to provide information on the various benefits created by the Project and to prepare an estimate of such benefits to Miami, Florida (the City). Our analysis is based on an economic model which estimates economic and tax impacts of various projects on a designated area. The model is specifically tailored to the economy of the City. Definition of Economic and Tax Impact The construction and subsequent operation of the Project will create important benefits within Greater Miami. These benefits include new income, new jobs, new tax revenues and new economic activity impacting upon every sector of the local economy. Moreover, through the multiplier effect of respending and reinvesting, indirect economic benefits are added to the direct benefits brought about by initial construction expenditures and the expenditures from ongoing operations. Terremark Brickell - II Economic Impact Study Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. October 31, 1997 Page 4 INTRODUCTION, OBJECTIVES AND DEFINITIONS Direct and Indirect Effects The total economic impact of public and private projects and policies on a region do not end with the impact from the initial construction expenditures; the continued benefits to the local economy must also be considered. Income to firms furnishing construction materials and services is subsequently converted into employee salaries, material purchases, investment in plant and equipment, savings, profits, purchases of services, and a variety of other economic activities. Income to laborers is subsequently respent for purchases of food, housing, transportation, entertainment, education, medical and dental services, clothing, personal services, and a wide variety of other goods and services. Furthermore, income to governmental units is respent as salaries, purchases, and support of a variety of programs, including education, transportation, and social services. In turn, individuals, firms, and governments furnishing these goods and services again spend their income for more purchases, salaries, investments, and savings. In this manner, indirect benefits result each time the initial sum is respent, and the additional sum available in the local economy induces further job creation, business development and savings. Quantification of these indirect benefits has been the object of considerable economic study. Because economic relationships are so complex in our modern society, no single area or political unit is a completely self-contained economic unit. Therefore, purchases from other areas and political units are necessary, and goods and services are exported in return. As purchases are made from other units, some of the benefits of economic respending are lost to the local economy. Ultimately, a smaller and smaller portion of the initial sum would remain, until, after several rounds of respending, an insignificant sum is left. The indirect effects can be viewed as a set of "ripples" in the economy. Indirect, like direct, resources require labor, materials, equipment and services for their production to induce further job creation and spending of wages. Terremark Brickell II - Economic Impact Study October 31, 1997 Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. page 5 INTRODUCTION, OBJECTIVES AND DEFINITIONS The "ripple" impact of the indirect effect multiplies the original impact of the purchase. The common measure of the magnitude of the "ripple" effect is called a multiplier. A multiplier measures the total magnitude of the impact on each particular economic indicator as a multiple of the initial, direct effect. For instance, a multiplier of " 1 " would signify no "ripple" effects as the total impact is 1 times the initial impact, while a multiplier of "2" would imply that the total impact is 2 times the direct effect. The actual magnitude of a multiplier depends on the likelihood the goods and services purchased in a region would be produced in, or provided from the region. The model we used to estimate the total economic impact incorporates a multiplier developed by utilizing past consumption and production patterns in the City. Measures of Economic Impact Various measures can be used to indicate the impact of a policy or project on a region. Specifically, for this study, they are the changes (increases) in local employment, wages, tax revenue and output that result. Definitions of these measures are as follows: 0 Employment is measured in full -time -equivalent jobs. 0 Wages include wages, salaries, and proprietors income only. They may include non -wage compensation, such as pensions, insurance, and other fringe benefits. Wages are assumed to be expended by households in the area at which the wage- earner resides. 0 Local taxes include additional revenues from both ad valorem and non ad valorem assessments. Terremark Brickell II - Economic Impact Study October 31, 1997 INTRODUCTION, OBJECTIVES AND DEFINITIONS Measures of Economic Impact (Continued) 0 Direct Euenditures include those sums expended for land acquisition, site preparation and all hard and soft costs associated with the project. 0 Indirect Expenditures are those sums expended within the local economy as a result of the "ripple" effect described earlier. 0Qg= describes total economic activity, and is essentially equivalent to the sum of direct and indirect expenditures (exclusive of wages and taxes). Description of Results For the purpose of describing the total economic benefits of the Project, the related expenditures have been broken into two categories: (1) Development (2) Operational Developmental expenditures include those expenditures related to the design and construction phase of the Project and related amenities. Operational expenditures are those expenditures incurred in connection with the ongoing operation of the office, residential and 5 star hotel components. Terremark Brickell II - Economic Impact Study October 31, 1997 Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. Page 7 TERREMARK BRICKELL II THE PROJECT OVERVIEW PROJECT OVERVIEW The Project The proposed Project consists of 372,788 square feet of office space, a 44 unit luxury residential complex and a 246 room 5-star hotel on a 3.74 acre site located on Brickell Avenue between 14th Terrace and 14th Lane, Miami, Florida. Construction is expected to commence during the second quarter of 1998. The construction period is expected to be 24 months. Occupancy of the constructed units is expected to begin no later than June, 2000. Terremark Brickell II - Economic Impact Study Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. October 31, 1997 Page 8 TERREMARK BRICKELL II DISCUSSION OF THE RESULTS OF THE ANALYSIS DISCUSSION OF THE RESULTS OF THE ANALYSIS Impact Indicators We measured the project's impact on four commonly -used indicators of economic activity. Those indicators are: 0 Jobs 0 Wages 0 Total output 0 Local taxes Results of Indicators The economic indicator most commonly measured, and publicly reported on to gauge the economic impact of a public project is output. The impact of a project on the indicator output is often referred to as the project's economic impact. Exhibits I - III detail the Project's direct and indirect impact on the above economic indicators for Greater Miami. A summary of such impact follows: Development, One -Time Employment Wages Output Taxes Total Direct Indirect 174 $38,650,000 $103,079,506 82,784,246 $285,487 $142,014,993 82,784,246 Total Development Impact 174 $38,650,000 $185,863,752 $285,487 $224,799,239 Operational Annual Direct Indirect 480 $13,900,000 $10,800,000 10,437,120 7$3,805,856 $28,505,856 10,437,120 Total OperationalImpact 480 $13,900,000 $21,237,120 $3,805,856 $38,942.976 Terremark Brickell 11 - Economic Impact Study October 31, 1997 Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. Page 9 DISCUSSION OF THE RESULTS BY ECONOMIC INDICATOR Impact of Construction: The site preparation and construction expenditures, estimated at $112 million, within Greater Miami would create approximately 174 new full time equivalent jobs and a maximum of 324 workers employed during peak periods. The workers will earn approximately $39 million in wages. These jobs will primarily be in the construction, transportation and related service industries. As can be seen in the above chart, spending for site preparation and project construction would result in a total estimated impact of $225 million dollars. This impact consists of the effects of both the direct site preparation and project construction expenditures, including wages, and the multiplied effects of the resulting indirect benefits. Impact of Ongoing Operations As a result of the on -going operation of the office complex, the luxury residential units, and the 246 room hotel, Greater Miami will gain approximately 480 new, permanent, full-time equivalent jobs. The workers who obtain these positions will earn approximately $13,900,000 annually. The total expenditures for the Project's operations will provide a new, permanent impact of $35.1 million annually to the City's economy. This impact consists of the effects of the direct expenditures from the maintenance and security of office component, the luxury residential units, and the operations of the hotel, as well as the multiplied effects of such spending thus creating indirect benefits. Impact on Local Tax Revenues As a result of the construction and operation of the Project, various state, county, and city governments and agencies would gain a one-time tax revenue increase of $285,487 and an estimated annual tax benefit of $3.8 million. The specific entities receiving these tax revenues are shown on page 15. Terremark Brickell II - Economic Impact Study Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. October 31, 1997 Page 10 TERREMARK BRICKELL II DISCUSSION OF RESULTS BY ECONOMIC INDICATOR DISCUSSION OF RESULTS BY ECONOMIC INDICATOR Our analysis of the economic and tax benefits of the Project was done by each major phase of the project. We identified the major phases to be development and operations. This analysis determines the economic benefits to the City by identifying such benefits for each of the phases. The effect on economic indicators used to measure benefits (employment, wages, output and taxes) were computed for each phase. Employment Employment is one of the most important economic benefits of the development. It is one of the most accessible and direct benefits for the City's residents and is a primary means by which development, operations and maintenance expenditures generate indirect economic benefits. A portion of this employment occurs on -site in the form of short-term development and marketing activity, and a portion is longer term employment derived from on -going operations. Further employment is generated off -site by expenditures of the tenants in area businesses. Additional on -site employment is a result of the on -going management of the residential complex and the daily operations of the hotel. As can be seen in Exhibit I, total short term (Developmental) employment will average 174 employees over a 30 month period and the total on -going employment will average 480. The total on -going positions can be summarized as follows: 0 Leasing Staff 0 Management 0 Security/Police & Parking 0 Hotel Staff 0 Maintenance and Clean -Up 0 Engineering 0 Restaurant 0 Shopping Terremark Brickell II - Economic Impact Study October 31, 1997 Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. Page 11 DISCUSSION OF RESULTS BY ECONOMIC INDICATOR From statistical data obtained from the Tourism Department, residents spending in the City of Miami is classified into various expenditure categories. These include: 0 Eating/Drinking 0 Grocery 0 Auto Rental 0 Other Transportation 0 Service Station 0 Recreation 0 Retail Although it is known that these expenditures will be made, in the interest of conservatism, we did not include same in this report. We took this approach because we believe it would be difficult to contend that a majority of the occupants of this Project will come from out of town rather than other parts of the city or county. Wages The computation of wages are a direct by-product of employment. As discussed in the above section, both on -site and off -site jobs are created. These jobs were both temporary and permanent in nature. To compute the wages associated with the new employment we started with budgeted data directly related to the development and operations of the Project. Employment created, such as construction related employment, was obtained directly from construction estimates. These numbers were tested for reasonableness. Terremark Brickell II - Economic Impact Study October 31, 1997 Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. Page 12 DISCUSSION OF RESULTS BY ECONOMIC INDICATOR Output Total output generated as a result of the development and operations of the Project is caused by the following type of expenditures. 0 Developer cost expended in the City (100 %) 0 Annual operational expenditures of management company 0 New spending in Greater Miami by residents, visitors, employees and business owners Exhibit II shows a summary of the development cost expended in Greater Miami and of operational expenditures made in relation to the on -going maintenance of the Project. Exhibit IV gives a detailed breakdown of the development costs. To incorporate the impact of dollars being respent and/or reinvested in the City, a multiplier was applied to total direct output. A multiplier of 1.9664 was used to determine total direct and indirect output created by the Project. This multiplier indicates that for every $100 spent in Greater Miami, another $96.64 will be respent or reinvested in Greater Miami. This multiplier was obtained from the Dade County Planning Department. Direct output from the development phase of the Project is primarily a result of developer costs. This cost consists of land acquisition and site preparation, soft and hard costs which includes construction. To determine the total direct output we determined what development cost specifically was expected to be or had been spent in Greater Miami. Total direct output exclusive of wages during the development phase is $103,079,506. Total indirect output created by the direct respending in Greater Miami is $82,784,246. Thus total Greater Miami Output from the development of the Project is $185,865,752. Terremark Brickell II - Economic Impact Study October 31, 1997 Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. Page 13 DISCUSSION OF RESULTS BY ECONOMIC INDICATOR The final component of output results from the direct operating expenditures of the residential units, the hotel, and the indirect benefits created as a result of the multiplier effect on direct output. The Developer provided us with an annual operating budget for the residential complex. An overall assumption was made that all expenditures would be spent initially in the City of Miami. The total operating expenditures incorporate all estimated expenses of operation of the residential complex except for wages. The impact of wages was measured separately as an economic indicator. To incorporate the potential respending and reinvesting in Greater Miami, the multiplier effect was measured. By applying a multiplier of 1.9664 to the total direct output from operating expenditures, we determined total output (direct and indirect) from on -going operating expenditures. Total direct output created from operating expenditures is $10,800,000. Total indirect output created from operating expenditures is $10,437,120. Total output created from ongoing operations is $21,237,120. Local Taxes A key and significant benefit generated from the development and operation of the Project is taxes. Several types of tax revenue will be generated from this project including both ad valorem and other taxes. Specific ad valorem taxes include real and personal, property taxes. Other taxes include occupational taxes, resort taxes and community development taxes. Terremark Brickell II - Economic Impact Study October 31, 1997 Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. Page 14 DISCUSSION OF RESULTS BY ECONOMIC INDICATOR New real property taxes will be assessed on the Project. The assessment is based on a predetermined millage rate being applied to the taxable value of the real property. We computed real property taxes for the development phase based on the cost of the development of the project. This assessment base is very conservative since tax on real property typically is assessed on appraised values and not cost. Cost was used in the place of an estimated appraisal for conservatism. The basis for ongoing taxes is also overall cost. The millage rate was obtained from the County Tax Collectors office relative to the Project's location. Exhibit V shows the tax computation. The total development phase real property taxes, are expected to be $285,487 and the real property taxes expected to be generated annually are $3,805,857. Total ad valorem taxes assessed by Dade County are allocated based on mileage rates to certain governmental entities. Listed below is the allocation of projected tax revenue. Annual e- 'me City Operating $1,183,739 $88,794 City Miscellaneous 61,656 4,625 Schools 1,153,712 86,543 County Operating 797,709 59,838 Debt Service - City 259,696 19,481 Debt Service - County 95,444 7,160 South Florida Water 70,535 5,291 Library Operating 41,803 3,136 School Debt Service 124,546 9,343 Florida Inland Navigation 4,686 352 Environmental Projects 12,331 925 Total $3,805,857 $285,487 Although not quantified, Greater Miami, through its receipt of allocated state sales taxes will receive an additional benefit as a result of the development and operation of the project. Terremark Brickell II - Economic Impact Study October 31, 1997 Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. Page 15 TERREMARK BRICKELL II OTHER CONSIDERATIONS OTHER CONSIDERATIONS Public Sector Costs Given that a community has embarked on economic development which could involve increases in permanent residents, a major concern is the proper balance between the public sector revenues and the cost associated with the various forms this development may take. Public policy might seek to enhance development with beneficial net effects on the public sector, or at least avoid development having clearly adverse effects. Some of the costs that must be considered are required increases in the following: 0 Public Safety (police and fire) 0 Highways 0 Health and Environmental Services 0 Parks and Recreation 0 Capital Improvements (Infra structure) 0 Schools The objective of this report is not to measure the potential increases in public sector costs that may result from the development and operations of this project. Nor was this report's objective to compare the fiscal benefits with cost that may result from this project. Therefore we will not attempt to quantify such factors. We did feel it was necessary to make mention of certain potential fiscal costs that must be considered. Impact Fees A very significant factor in measuring the economic impact on a specific region of a project are impact and other required development fees. When a development occurs in the region being measured (Miami), specific fees must be paid to the region within which the development is to occur. A summary of the fees are listed below: 0 City of Miami Developmental Impact Fee 0 Administrative Fee 0 City of Miami Developmental Admin Fee 0 Building Permit Fee 0 Dade County School Impact Fee 0 Installation Energy Fee 0 Other Fees For the purpose of this economic impact analysis, fees are included as a part of the direct development cost (output). Impact fees total approximately $1,367,084 and other fees total approximately $957,422. These fees are shown in detail in Exhibit VII. Terremark Brickell II - Economic Impact Study October 31, 1997 Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. Page 16 TERREMARK BRICKELL II SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS Based upon the preceding in-depth analysis of the Terremark Brickell II Project, it appears that such a development can bring significant economic benefits to Greater Miami. This final section reviews the results of the employment opportunities, public sector revenues and total economic benefits on Greater Miami as a result of the development. Employment Employment considerations include the Project direct employment and employment created in the surrounding community through new residents spending. Total development phase employment will be approximately 174 and on -going annual employment resulting from the maintenance of the Project will be approximately 480. Tax Revenue The analysis of public sector revenues associated with the development includes taxes and other revenues generated directly by the project. Although public sector cost is a important element in measuring fiscal impact, for purposes of this project such cost have not been quantified. This analysis only measured the benefits derived from the project. Total tax revenues expected to be created are as follows: One Time $ 285,497 Annual $3, 805, 856 Output The analysis of total economic impact is measured by total output. This analysis measures the economic impact of development cost and outgoing, operational expenditures. To determine the effect of respending within Greater Miami, we utilized a multiplier to compute total direct and indirect benefits. Total output expected to be generated as a result of the development and operation of the project will approximate: One Time $185,863,752 Annual $ 21,237,120 Terremark Brickell H - Economic Impact Study October 31, 1997 Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. Page 17 Exhibit I Summary of Economic Impact Exhibit II Summary of all Direct Economic Benefits Exhibit III Computation of Indirect Benefits Exhibit IV Schedule of Project Development Cost Exhibit V Schedule of Ad Valorem Taxes Exhibit VI Allocation of Ad Valorem Taxes Exhibit VII Impact and Other Fees EXHIBIT LIST Terremark Brickell I1- Economic Impact Study Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. October 31, 1997 Page 18 TERREMARK BRICKELL II EXHIBIT I ECONOMIC BENEFITS STUDY SUMMARY OF ECONOMIC IMPACT OUTPUT WAGES EMPLOYMENT TAXES TERREMARK BRICKELL II ECONOMIC BENEFITS STUDY SUMMARY OF DIRECT ECONOMIC BENEFITS PHASE # OF EMPLOYEES WAGES DEVELOPMENT PHASE LAND PROJECT COST MARKETING FINANCING COSTS SUB -TOTAL RATIONS PHASE AL DIRECT BENEFITS EXHIBIT II TAXES DIRECT COST AD VALORUM $9,250,000 $285,487 168 $37,900,000 76,412,506 6 750,000 4,620,000 12,797,000 174 $38,650,000 $103,079,506 $285,487 480 13,900,000 10,800,000 3,805,856 654 $52,550,000 $113,879,506 $4,091,343 TERREMARK BRICKELL II ECONOMIC BENEFITS STUDY COMPUTATION OF INDIRECT BENEFITS DESCRIPTION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXHIBIT III APPLICABLE COMPUTED INDIRECT MULTIPLIER BENEFIT DEVELOPMENT PHASE LAND $9,250,000 0.9664 $8,939,200 SOFT COST HARD COST 9,000,000 67,412,506 0.9664 0.9664 8,697,600 65,147,446 $85,662,506 $82,784,246 TOTAL DEVELOPMENT PHASE 0.9664 OPERATIONAL PHASE $10,800,000 0.9664 $10,437,120 1 $93,221,366 TOTAL INDIRECT BENEFITS TERREMARK BRICKELL II ECONOMIC BENEFITS STUDY PROJECT DEVELOPMENT COST TYPE nF COST SPENT IN DADE EXHIBIT IV AMOUNT HARD COSTS: BASE BUILDING / PARKING 100; $100,500,000 LAND 10006 9,250,000 IMPACT FEES 10001 1,367,084 PERMIT FEES 10001 957,422 SITE PREPARATION 1000 250,000 COST OF MODELS 10006 250,000 CONTINGENCIES 1000-0 1,988,000 TOTAL HARD COSTS 1006 $114,562,506 BUDGETED SOFT COSTS 10001 9,000,000 PROJECT COST BEFORE FINANCING & MARKETING 1000 $123,562,506 MARKETING COSTS 1000 $5,370,000 FINANCING COST: FINANCING COSTS AND FEES 10001 2,497,000 INTEREST 1000 10,300,000 $12,797,000 TOTAL FINANCING COST AL PROJECT COST I 10006 I $141,729, TERREMARK BRICKELL II ECONOMIC BENEFITS STUDY COMPUTATION OF AD VALORUM TAXES DESCRIPTION REAL PROPERTY IDEVELOPED PROJECT VALUE MILLAGE TAX RATE COMPUTED R/E TAX VALUE MILLAGE TAX RATE COMPUTED F,/E TAX 1998 1999 & Beyond $114,062,506 30.8635 , 520, $9,250,000 $9,250,000 30.8635 1 30.8635 5,487 j $285,487 285,487 1 $3,805,856 EXHIBIT V TERREMARK BRICKELL II EXHIBIT VII ECONOMIC BENEFITS STUDY IMPACT AND OTHER FEES IMPACT AND OTHER FEES DevelopmentSquare Footages: Square Footage 1) Total _gross building area (excluding balconies) 0 2') Maximum development area (FAR) 823,687 3) Net 'apartment area 432,066 4) Gross parking area 462,867 B. Impact Fees: I Amount 1) Dade County School Impact Fee $90,828 2) City of Miami Development Impact Fee (Ord. 10426) 1,104,299 3) City of Miami Development Impact Admin. Fee 33,129 4) Downtown Development Supplemental Fee (Ord. 10461) 138,829 Total of all Impact Fees $1,367,084 C. Non -Impact Fees: 1) Miami Dade W.A.S.A. "connection fees" $368,880 2) Building Permit Fee 335,635 3) Installation Energy Fee 129,414 4) Re -plat '(legal & Survey) 20,000 5) Major Use Special Permit Application Fee 30,000 6) Dade County Code Compliance 50,250 7) Radon Gas Fee 6,471 8) Fire Plan Review Fee 12,469 9) Ground Cover Fee 2,362 10) Land Use/Zoning 11630 11) Zoning Review for Building Permit Fee 60 12) Certificate of Occupancy Fee 250 13) Application Fee 35 Total of all Non -Impact Fees $957,422 Total of all Fees for Project $2,324, Source: City of Miami Planning, Building and Zoning Department, May 12, 1997. X n.ry.w wew r=faV.+. Y.` A Moo, .eta-. ' w • •.r Row eo•eo.• Ar f.•�...w 4 ti •.• .`._f•r fM.. •A X oo. ti 4.r. ry lrl�. •.r. Y rt rf tr .�•1.�.0 ..o 1.r000 ti M0000 0000 _ f.W rl X w % r ]• . E T.t1 r•Mfyt. r t•�Y� YM� .lfM1r f.. '� a it . l..al.e hr Moo u 'r i it it frf•.r pr MM'^ 1 omo ..t i.r +ttrr.r frr a r s �� Mooft— a ,:• rr MAM0_ fr. oo- a oar •.r rf. a•.M. y rr 7 r M w f'r AMMMMMMMMM ln•o rrrF..ar a w w 1.0 . xr AM 'r K ;; ..f frf.o. ytr MMMMMMMMMM 1.t 0-- w K .toltll.oit wM. y rr yl Y Y hW- Moo i r f•wr 000 Y lr yM.dM, so. Y•.at r r i r s AM.*- ar .t�r is •.l.o•. f4.r M f.! oiM A,w w r ftry.r frr A, tr r w K w rrMty w ■+IrY ftr ty.l.�. Ytrt .tyfr/tr ltlr. � w r tro.. x... r.fo..r ...to. nr ..Mo.. frr. • s v �I ,Itr*r I'� ww1Y a K urtF. M1 &&AI. fetrt/.tl ye* A RESUBDiv!SCrd (;F E4L(01-K 1, AMENDED PLAT -IF P','`;T t' ar O nr,rn 1r PLAT PA(�� CI � r'i�LLT 1114'•J DC^i4I�ON— ECii�Pd �9, TO`1'/"J NIP 54�5, PANrE 41 E(:A�. 1 = S11 corP.lRFc 9', _�pJE. Iaq� c R ?F.. hPvc do aS�C laT _. IrlC 3152 "' aj0 w^!L'etitERS LAND i"R�EYORS P4i0NE fSGs`. 1liard I. ,Jn. 3JI45 _1 44b-`�-!' F4%� ��r';S) 44.- 1n34 60 30 0 '.A 80 F`2r-TF °LAZA P5 v'. ..- II GRAPniC ;GALE ST. J'AhlES AT P4:Ch EL'_ (ag 7afi P�.39j L ,oc t "A- I . rf.xm..^••al »n.n nl_Ypy Sl x .IV', DF- ar-. P,_:"l. TI g 1•v'... � 1erl �ya.ww •ui•n }y. r, 6125 T y ^ •2 f 112 20 rt -� F-P,2 ��n,.ai � d �i ••f.r t) Pq 1 F yay .Ma.•avM Pin � ro }•`^'�-Sf3� �ab ,y _'Q . rT• it 't' Y .,Ys �. �•l •. Sal .`-. Ilt �� } a t!.��,w�•w.ri 9x9� �5.T�0�• � �, ]9•_� -�tt Way ,tip t fn •.�..• vo `s`5 y',^' �yy� "•""+++ss+•�� � 1-_ h3 _.y •E *7 iM1• .qy swrM n.r i1.fY f•. rr 'r .w�+... r•fr ulrr fteft000 fr y +a r! r � f f.AMMO-n+o.. wf. '1..1•Y...f. t....t•► ur e.tly.W f.w x r w afrtra.. .'•. f..eu.l ar. ftaaaM.r w.r L or r ea..ro. r.�. a••o. fY..t t0 r r iGw .at.t1•.tf« w w 0 R •frga..r .woo, .lMre. rpe. f..r.. frrr f ? -MMov_ f.e•oo MAw tl r w ( f..q...tf. MoM0000 b. .tur•r fta.r t.f.Me..o r..— amoo`,t. O r r Y if w trly.. far a s ! = u AoM_ .r.r..r. Moomr�. omo or• ... ai r >• f w Moo. r•rr .uf rf.• w •] r r r fwl... hr e•.fl•.•... r.. rram... �r r•oit fMr Tw K et•.yan M fe.l.re w.r.r 0•W stl•o,00Mo IUMMMI 4.r ter r� At it X ].r ww MoMoM 4r.rr +tom r Ir a tr w 1..r +.. a.... tr e...r..... ' f.ntrY.le frr M I! w W w w er. .40...r f tMM. opr ..�. K !r tWM•l IY. ...a. Mo Mopb000-l.� ytrr•o r ♦ r f w r �Mo 4.r� .tlr.M.r1 a w n r r � fyo e., .rfM.l.r fort.. ul1 f.rMffl f141. AM, jr r At sr r r oM w a.. w a T f Iwll �.f�r~lyr ~e eft •w/f. a��f.t Ittr �.rf 4.il�M.rr �M�w Yrr a w w .e1.Mfr •. wMe. rr . w 4 ..%_ Moo .eror .e.r _A N C Ewr ]' Sj M 42 1�•: i Yin. •. -Ir.04 i►. wr 'o.• ter• ut r f w 0000M000, oot wuay'..a tl• w K .••o. ti. . i•.1 f.MM.O. Moo.'! arr. i rr b ++w.. n..m000st +r r •.mtr. •a Moo, Mwoow 1 w rJ `AMMM_ e.r.r f.r i •Pry.. Orr w , •f pl4M.. hf. i : Yro yM.. e..nr. w r ff..o. w +.... 1 r w uw++. .rY+• l•.• cerr r al. no nar ti t e r •s f.r fr N.1 I.1f ,.... QM_ w... '.rM or Moo, r.r you •f'1io �.r �.MMA w w e -Mow w tr... f. ♦ice I f tf.1.. w rrl ..�•• +w tMMI IV .r rr w •eerr.r e.. na ..tlrle. fMr llMoMM' q.ro G r Y s f.r M now- aya.. f.r. ra>. r tr ...A. nq. Mre ~M� �..Mf rI r r w s w wt/r •.. r rs B1r fe.fMe.1,o t a...e r. r1n .rrM.0 frr le iw w w Y wo"oor IMM" y+t1r o� 01' it s w Zoo Mow w %Mo 4..4. ti r....or tW.r ee4.t w w Q -w-1.1. ettlnor frr oMMMr Me w 4 f� x..oft oMf Moor o.r 4:4 _ 34763' , 11 S=a Is ,r 1 t I a 41 l i --_ _.ip-.-._•yip-_ _-�-!-...Y.--�--T, � r..�.d �.. t.•oyr n . TA BE;'_? _ ,.. �C?N=^.' •aW xT .4r.q'• Z. frt•a^. •....•. fw,. -w ,r ]..d .••• 4a1.. a1.. •. w�.• ! ; a.nr�o. t•w •rfy.r .tf•a y rR tR .yyrt....e .uf+1Fw .UM.. ft•w .Y r tr Gry•r Nr•• IM.Vt e.r. •Il r M a.ry. yr =.ee.'e.1 .ram e•.Mn. q..,. ' » . x � w oar o.+ tt•M..rerM .... •r.� .x v_ +r r r •.r„r.. nr fu.etw fM.. .r.o� hw m » v •o. , ha f.tf4...•MoMMMM M M S Iy . .. 000gw rtf. •. ti -ntw,��wf.r .•,Mrp r�ro s f r '..r .nt i•..atr ww `I e....re. .rfrfy. .ra xr• f .r tl•fI•. rtw fy. ayw i.ura. i►.. wrM. ■ r w 000 tW wv. t.•,. n.rro. Rtr eMltor ..... w r• le r rrM000000 xwf.+r ,.r.o x�..r ' rr X tq.i rY Mr rrn xtt + . •. o.� ��- '�w« ��'"•" • w lr er.o..o.t Polo. •. .•+.Y. w.. n1 M n+ : w •z ��•.r.� ti Re.rtr• l..r .. �...." ..tel.• n•. .ta.•r•r .r n. W w M r trroM .« t..M� .er . Mod" r`f K If s..tr ti .a tr.. �r rn xif w r wo~t yam. � r.Moerr`r :Mtl ar oM000 etr e.•.- �e frW it !r .1.... waw ,•...,,. w W •r w 1 ,r f...0..— +..M t.•.'No M1 r.Merf .r tYrrFry •Y tr w ftrMr aMe r rM.r fe.r. K W f w W Y *fpf_ tw f.w.rr fM.r fea.o. tM. yrrl.. fry AM w a r v r ttr.or.w fry.r ..t•.t er.y.. tre lflaorM r� t GCA ivN MAP: SCAU I'-3W •p"-f,°n jl ___'an sa • "�f1 L!eM Omavonl J>o•=au••c1. nonaa L AL s r•.o„yx 23. �l ve 91•-c4 o9ethe Ih h^se AYlNL � P,,,ll NE N, CCa'OYt� the (' :t 1 x ] e.T• el r Plat od 2 ut Paq• 91 c,f tn. -R— .t aae ' anti. F .da. Sud Ands '.pnq ana ''xr.rq •r. -'ly M H:am., Florida. G s .:a.n' a o-! �r ,��. v>ar. ro f✓.rnelw MDL- Mre tM Eostsny Rpft �f-May X w �a a.wl uev. YOcY70.5-L s l.N 1. ^r:a•-.r•, a. ', ca«] cn {n• twx moneo-. n e•e-n• r. 6.r Ir..l W ••r`nee � wnw,'oyan' qbr •.) Conllr.<lypn o �Y.p-. ♦. Afey to oxt d— . c2W Sy Ff- 0 .00 ac i S Thct garen y .IM nM ful jfc! .o •.pl-W-.•y a.A-cenat • Crt•.t x.•, t / ; •teat .Y 3e. Ol1r.r• r'YYsB'1 10 a1", ceoM F. Be..+er.v.•'+4.I4.a—, of .e Mary - Sc�.•h••et _. N BA—. .♦ •;£ 15 4 � n �. �• 4, BiT � Te i� t.Cs0 6 . '•' S J4H, ••aofc• ..I a. �r� 7K]0 0t91• Ff..].l :ot. r♦fS l V Er •f WE'S ostt 5 t r u fI`fY) fr F :F 'x! Vn c✓as �•".aLS3 i..5 t Y > 1 f Sy tR-a :F I,:.'+[ . crts awe Aran) 1 S ;fnc:Wvsq 4ey!' i 1WMI 4 Mw VE M... ^ p W yary .e•er u1 frl t wolf if -1 .y^ aep eta a. fllr n onl t 1 qu p.•M.rnt a - c• atv;ei re cnkims �.• as •.r V•.Irnfmna i.p•n•r,.r Bond r Larrtl it✓wyo.a r',l-.t. A mr-. r r .r gin. an-..,••m. �._•b , ' 9!cr..n rr.amyy by TMyafr,^,•f 1?� Z607 i9oyan. a '?r t-19 • C�crs rut G,; .e• FI lT 3', �kM1; TwY trlM.ert Ll. •� �� trl... • ,irrw �] a.... S1M atw E.R. BROWNELL do ASSOC.f1NC" fi \ )COF+SIXTING ENGINEERS - URV MD SUEYORS 3152 C0101 WCY Y6]mi, Ft. 33145 (305) A46-351$ TERREMARK BRICKELL II MAJOR USE PERMIT Drawing List SHEET TITLE Cover Project Summary FAR -CAL Floor Area Ratio Calculations FAR-GRND FAR Ground Floor Plan FAR-2nd FAR 2nd Floor Plan FAR-3rd FAR 3`d Floor Ballroom Floor Plan FAR-4th FAR 4`h Floor Hotel Fitness Deck FAR -Hotel FAR Typical Hotel Floor Plan - 5' thru 14th FAR-RESID FAR Typical Residential Floor Plan - 15`h thru 18th FAR -OFFICE FAR Typical Office Tower Floor Plans A-0-1 Context Site Plan L-1 Ground Floor Landscape Plan L-2 Recreation Deck Landscape Plan L-3 Ballroom Garden Terrace L-4 Sculpture Terrace and Hotel Pool Landscape Plan A-1.0 Ground / Site Plan A-2.2 Second Floor Plan - B.O.H. A-2.3 Third Floor Plan - Ballroom/Mtg. A-2.4 Fourth Floor Plan - Fitness Center/Sky Lobby SHEET TITLE A-3.0 Typical Hotel Plan - 5`h thru 14"' A-4.0 Typical Residential Plan - 15' - 18th A-5-T Office Transfer 19`h Floor A-5.0 Typical Office Floor Plan 20`h - 32nd A-5.1 Typical Upper Office Floor Plan 33`d - 38`h A-6.0 Building Elevation - West A-6-Oa Building Elevation - East A-6.1 Building Elevation - North A-6.2 Building Elevation - South A-6.3 Building Elevation - East Garage A-7.0 Building Section A-7.1 Building Section Project Summary for Terremark Brickell II October 31, 1997 PROJECT CRITERIA - ZONING / SETBACKS / OVERVIEW SITE/REQUIRED/PROVIDED!/%//// ZONING DISTRICT SD-5 BASE F.A.R. 4.25 3.25 NET LOT AREA 162,989.56 SY NET LOT DIMENSIONS 588'-6' X 290'-0" GROSS LOT AREA 222,854.12 S.F. (5.1 ACRES) OPEN SPACE 15% 33,428.11 S.F. 75,612.72 S.F. BUILDING FOOTPRINT 133,813.82 SY 116,396.68 S.F. GROSS F.A.R. (4.25 X G.L.A.) 947,129.90 S.F 723,891.15 S.F. GROSS NON F.A.R. 629,875.20 S.F. PROJECT GROSS TOTAL 1,353,766.35 S.F. • ALONG BRICKELL 260'-0" • ALONG 14TH LANE / TERRACE 543'-5' BUILDINGi. MAX ALLOWEDi%///i/%////////////�i%/%////i%/,PROVIDED BUILDING (38 FLRS.) NO HEIGHT RESTRICTION 577'-1" PARKING STRUCTURE (7 FLRS.) NO HEIGHT RESTRICTION 73'-5" SETBACKS % !'� " "%':i MINIMUM:'//�i SETBACK FOR BRICKELL 30'-0' FRONT 30'-0" FRONT SETBACK 14TH LANE/TERRACE 15'-0" SIDE 15'-0" SIDE PROGRAM ; //j j-; ;,// i/GSF /PROJECT OVERVIEW (Does not Include Shafts / Hoistwaysl' HOTEL 342,030 GSF GROUND - 14TH FLOOR RESTAURANT / BAR / LOUNGE / GOURMET DELI 1 BALLROOM / 5 MEETING ROOMS 246 HOTEL ROOMS FITNESS CENTER / SPA / POOL- RESIDENTIAL 85.748 GSF 15TH - 18TH FLOOR (4 floors) 40 APARTMENT UNITS OFFICE 372,799 GSF 19TH - 38TH FLOOR (20 Floors) RETAIL 18,822 GSF STREET LEVEL WITHIN HOTEL AND GARAGE FOOTPRINT 68% OF TOTAL STREET FRONTAGE IS RETAIL RECREATIONAL DECK 4,288 GSF (63,290 GSF OF OUTDOOR SPACE) 7TH FLOOR (ROOF OF PARKING STRUCTURE) RACQUETBALL / TENNIS / BASKETBALL / RUNNING TRACK LAP POOL / JACUZZI / OUTDOOR CAFE PARKING STRUCTURE 462,867 GSF GROUND - 6TH FLOOR 963 PARKING SPACES Project Summary (Cont.) October 31, 1997 PROJECT CRITERIA - FAR / PROGRAM BREAKDOWN F.A.R. BREAKDOWN - PROGRAM;%'"� /" F.A.R.//�j/NON - "F A.R.'���j�j�GROSS�� Ground Floor Bldg. Entry Lobby n/Load Retail ng/Se Restaurant/Bar Kitchen/Loading/Service 32,046.30 s.f. 15,047.80 s.L 47,094.10 gsf. Ground Fir. Park. Struct. Entry & exit Hotel Office Parking Retail/Bank Drive thru/Tellers 14,418.20s.f. 54,729.70 s.f. 69,147.90 gsf. 2nd Floor Bldg. Maaktenance/Corrdois 8,500.40s.f. 14,995.90 s.L 23,496.3 gsf. 2nd Floor Park. Struct. Hotel Parking 357.30s.f. 64,674.30 s.L 65,031.60 gsf. 3rd Floor Bldg. Ballroom/Meeting Rooms/Restrooms 17.959.45s.f. 39,419.45 s.f. 57,378.90 gsf. 3rd Floor Park. Struct. Hotel Parking 357.30s.f. 69,270.75 s.f. 69,628.05 gsf. 4th Floor Bldg. Fitness/Spa Center/office Sky Lobby 20,488.00 s.f. 7,226.80 s.f. 27,714.80 gsf. 4th Floor Park. Struct. office Parking 0.00S.f. 69,707.50 s.f. 69,707.50 gsf. `.h - 14th Floor Bldg. 246 Hotel Rooms - 10 Floors 211,512.00 s.f. 25,872.00 s.f. 237,384.00 gsf. tith & 6th Park. Struct. Office Parking (2 Floors) 0.00 S.f. 139,415.00 s.f. 139,415.00 gsf. 7th Floor Park. Struct. Recreation Bldg./Tennis/Basketball Running Track/Lap Pool/Cafe Bar 2,065.20 s.f. 69,465.90 s.f. 71,531.10 gsf. 15th - 18th Floor Bldg. .40 Residential Units (4 Floors) 84,604.80 s.f. 10,352.80 s.f. 94,957.60 gsf. 19th Floor Office Transfer Floor 21,496.00s.f. 3,607.10 s.f. 25,103.10 gsf. 20th - 32nd Floor Office Floors (13 Floors) 218,382.50 s.f. 31,535.40 s.f. 249,917.90 gsf. 33nd - 38th Floor Office Floors (6 Floors) 91,703.70s.f. 14,554.80 s.f. 106,258.50 gsf. TOTAL 723,891.15 s.f. 629,875.20 s.f. 1,353,766.35 gsf. HOTEL ROOM BREAKDOWN"- /"-/ " FLOORS UNITS PER FLOOR TOTAL STANDARD (561 SF) JUNIOR (694 SF) 1 BDR. (932 SF) LUXURY (1,206 SF) PRESIDENTIA1. (1,708 SF) 5TH - 10th 25 X 6 150 108 24 06 12 NONE 11TH - 12TH 25 X 2 50 44 NONE 02 04 NONE 13TH - 14TH 23 X 2 46 34 06 02 ' NONE 04 TOTAL W 246 186 (75.6%) 30 (12.2%) 10 (4.1%) 16 (6.5%) 04 (1.6 %) RESIDENTIAL UNIT BREAKDOWN;%/,- Floor Units/Floor 1 Br. 1,180 SF 2 Br. 1,819 SF 3 Br. 2,394 SF 4 Br. 3,979 SF 15tH - 18TH 10 X 4 20 12 04 04 TOTAL ('/.) 40 20 (50%) 12 (30%) 04 (10%) 04 (10%) RETAIL BREAKDOWN Floor WITHING HOTEL WITHIN PARKING STRUCTURE TOTAL GROUND 3,837 SF 14,985 SF 18,822 SF Project Summary (Cont.) October 31, 1997 PROJECT CRITERIA - PARKING / LOADING PARKING j/ / ZONING CODE RESIDENTIAL USES Min. 1 space and Max 2. spaces per unit 20 One Bedrooms 1 space x 20 = min. by code 40 spaces 12 Two Bedrooms 1 space x 12 = min. by code 12 spaces 04 Three Bedrooms 2 space x 04 = max. by code 08 spaces 04 Four Bedrooms 2 space x 04 = max. by code 08 spaces HOTEL USES 1 space per 4 Lodging Units = min. by code 246 Lodging Units 246/4 = min by code 62 spaces BUSINESS USE 1 space per 500 S.F. = Max. by code Hotel Administration 4,930/500 = max. by code 10 spaces Office 331,582/500 = max. by code 663 spaces "ETAIL USES 1 space per 1000 S.F. = min. by code Retail (Within Hotel Footprint) 3,837/1000 = min. by code 04 spaces Retail (Within Garage Footprint) 14,985/1000 = min. by code 15 spaces RESTAURANT, BARS & MISC. 1 space per 100 S.F. = max. by code Hotel Restaurant 4,600/100 = max. by code 46 spaces Hotel Lobby Lounge 2,020/100 = 'max. by code 20 spaces Hotel Bar 1,726/100 = max. by code 18 spaces Hotel Gourmet Deli 1,656/100 = max. by code 17 spaces NET TOTAL PARKING 923 spaces HANDICAPPED 2% of Total (923) = min. by code 19 spaces TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED 942 spaces TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED 963 spaces PARKING CONFIGURATION."'!�//!///%/'/ FLOOR NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES GROUND 58 (39 STANDARD + 19 HC) 2ND 152 3RD 201 4TH - 5TH 408 (204 X 2 FLOORS) 6TH 144 TOTAL 963 PROVIDED LOADING REQUIREMENTS];' i//, REQUIRED/j///,. /% j%///,/�/////%//////%///,PROVIDED Project Gross 25,000 TO 500,000 G.S.F = 4 BERTHS Square Footage = 817,724 EVERY ADDITIONAL 500,000 G.S.F. = 1 BERTH 4 BERTHS @ 12' X 55' TOTAL BERTHS 4 BERTHS Chi 12' X 35' REQUIRED = 1 BERTH @ 12' X 55' 02 BERTHS @ 10 X 35' • (Class II Permit allows (1) - 12'x 55' Berth to be replaced with (2) - 10' x 20' Berths) BF.RMELLO, AJAMU„ & PARTNERS, INC. ARCHI'TECI'URE, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE, CIVIL ENGINEERING, &INTERIOR DESIGN 2601 SOUTH BAI'3HORE D1tIVE, SUITE 1000, MfAMI, FLORIDA 33133 (305)8592050 (9638 FAX OCTOBER 31, 1997 m 0 u 0 s 0 p. CITY OF MRM MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERWr APPLICATION SCAl r-4a-a > UJi BERMELLO-AJAMIL & PARTNERS-INC W_ ow, aal � 'no"' 0,1- rI " 33133 (3ml �mo " (m) a olcss � j,. - TERREMARK BRICKELL 11 CONCEPTUAL DESIGN {er raw 1.- -0. =. 0- SAN call n1 Sri mlrlrw. o ." nu. CONTEXT SITE PLAN NORTH A-0-1 i PLANT LIST m auw m oa. w+A.e oTARe.L wre aBa rmo warm oalLaa w � nmce�u. Ot14NOY Otl-M OOY WO► v M Wa WVAftWMS OA Nlyf NW OCTIOO�NA1N,f,vw AAWOIY vtw f � RAILOAOwOt10lfA/Af tllOM a wave row r tw Auwis lununusnrrfssaw w Acmfcr%f ZM wet f AALLOAOA AS"- Y, aaRf LIiNJIt1LLAA vOw f RIL CAN>rrrwYltYw RAw MOGMI 7 w4ftwv NN AOAr �yT• f0. v wIULLYO.N 11-N7w001 Or va Ott astlTiTAAw vow v wurn.�wYf+m6wrr.saaw A s.ROL.NN -&-OAOMT• fOA f 0 RLLLOAOfOo01oNMTIif0.1 "� "a ILAOtI1pArI.N IaArT RMNRI•A[i/f• row I OOIL RALIOAOOgtOaOlm anuAeRrf Af sf•w esA. LnnfaL. ivLrr IOw f B I.Ywlowrmt1 PLANT LIST .v Wr CDWAM f .- M A = J MAL J nc— Auf-w lttdl• f v TwL RIA~3r fJ r oAstr.LnLaLAA ...uNrLam= f r TwL ROAAAwlssc- a erso.or.w zM pjruvcft w w rta ftMA0J ftX.ZLAIfwOC A rA11La1 "Aoffa I%." Y w TNL KALAW tKWIR YBON G TOtcm1 daMAWpY Af Ar ccL RaA4TYR4wwAwm OOa1 M 114YW .IIMAO vol"ur w w 14LL AYtWWOC ti A►NA nw ImoCrlswooNlus Y w 3" MLA" wan a ow" 7ALMAA4 w I w !taow" ALAMf woe PLANT LIST w awwrr VWm WYt7" M"M r tti�tt{ tmu v v mw>aslewuArr.ffaLw li YOf LWMVM *AW f v IOAL AALT AN ANLYLB V•1-tBwM.Ml LVMwB.y t v rcm :QC NMMw a@ % wte LLT I•LwQA{a LATMA v v ION. RAANfwOC M -YPTN &GLT LC V*WM'fCRNYpy? v f ]ON. RyAytf OC r• wY 0*,Wm.t AMN IQIAMMP AI A-•1CY f f IOAL AL Wac BERMELLO•AJAMIL & PARTNERS-INC 1YIL..tun rtl...n.t rwwu fOL 10 .t. 1 rl tBl ee.-aoee ru (se) er-aex tt Lmm BwcLmt B u& AA.u. umtM WA..LMLF) FWIM- "o -u—) HltCltiJ, t la /I.TIf. ow�w.Y.a) �. eL..F n.rlf. bL9 0 .FAIR AK AAlp.R.L.A FL 0Si REG. C. Na:;Mf M 000I24 2 Mist M.r.¢ TERREMARK BRICKELL H c_ N. rrtwom rYAT r. lf_C D.LAc OCT. ]I 1"7 o....: O. LFB OY..A: PA CADO All YL BOA. On. B nu. GROUND FLOOR LANDSCAPE PLAN r..a w L-1 • e 1 a t n T e R e A C e JL n PLANT LIST m ar■nr •oa.oPNNe 9ar.Irert N.te Ivor srAO oaala asn.■ i sacr■r rOrr4M B� MWAr4M waoontJV MfWr It■N'AI{rrAM OCTI�MAW Mrr RJ9{MC{M OOA r wrirorwrr JraOM RI muftm Nv■QArarm?? rcz f rt/ wrJ.oTrtJYNd+Gw cm ODODeROeM trwNt rdt f on aAiwwa■PrmrlAf A4*cm v 2. uwatY aJ ejrTrm r NLfMOI'P1Y11■]MMr YidM Tr -mmm" 11YM[Ya9rf :" GA / : wIMMRAWJrfwr■■e MM3 c *Am powl LJiNI■Y AKA 4Z f t♦ weeONYL1r111■IIi RAW MeeMP W Lmpq ptN Cwl mwsw r0A ♦ 9■ wlrrarrtJY Miewrl■111rN0 0 iAl rlRlarCm cowA moLo� coA f 10 wONerr ■Arlar■RAn YrOw �+■Mowm rw f awL werona■elaw Rw lrww *a 1 4 t h L A M B PLANT LIST m arNnr. oa.olwr 90PN<JLN.■ Ivan. sArJO DOI■reN �Im J aaa JN01M JI110rIt 1119�M r r rrA w A@9O T SO■v YY4rA IYfA?u lICJ7a■OrnWtX r ! oeI %AAw ASsom A CMYYOrMY rMYIr■tMaa rr Y ]YL R4MLTR�RAMMtM tr OG R 9rlr■P M��PYrllrar Y Y rsA R]L■LTr1rAMfLIMIYDc rW OYIIP JD0118L $DW"MrMl==ANJiLTn Y Y ]rA RuwNNr.w.trr roe AC t■Ip MJANrML R1AIIPIMCJ1WIr'J " 7 ]alL R)L#Mn INr1ao> r" w rmprA" r�.{INp0111Aye Y Y 30L RY/1AW YDC 4 clr %T Cl"ANAMM r S tall rW .aC. PLANT LIST xr aW■n mrulNMe 9arrx NMe lean raw cool- a91N9a m ®JneAa■ un" Il4rTI�OA1r r a IYL RUAr row M Jl9rlltr 9M199rf NrMl■r r.rYNLJB a O IDIL RrtAM VOC/ K ■e91LLr M1■erA■lAT1RYA r O IaL RMrt/If raO rW RPMDu PalOY 0911■IOM r r I . RMM M M rd <m9MRl1Le Y Y OCaI. wrtJPr YfelrP Io anatokas 1■wwuau r r IyL Ruowwwac A lmramm rJbr. M®t9r9k" Y Y 30L wrtJlr Jr SO. LV rrrerrwLom IJ9aQYrdlm r r IwL RWeaOaM✓eat r. arr Psnra AsnJr altos r r IrA wnr■D■■IlPf roC BERMELLO •AJAMIL & PARTNERS-INC 2201 1 . Ie— tMru►ru Dnw Mom .N1. rang. 331a (on1 ae.-amo ra tM1 er-+er ti. 11N M Ca19r12 TWCYApI ■NCImJ. D IJr. (J ranru D■ItN Puete-+IIP% CuaPunrulYr�NJ■t D la 4 Mn4 u-rantaaj 9rD1 1 Yrbun Dr, r�ts.Il.. 1 Cwwut C— RM4 171r7 0 '.A C . .1 FL LANDSCAPE Mlpui[CT ac ND.: M =1242 N.i_ N TERREMARK BRICKELL II IRr PWI ------------ CN-a N. 971 r.mr IWs - r0'-P Uw OLT. ]1,119r wNw a c - . PA CADO RI. ]EL 80.0. o ., nu. RECREATION DECK LANDSCAPE PLAN re.w N. L-2 PLANT LIST aT MAW" Comm NAA! WTAAACX MIX W09 swiD CUOTION ag"i B O+ PAm momLam PAW � 5 OA 1 n GN. P(u 4EADy SVI g rRU4QkANT INCCMANQ) LL i{N u � OW d QA 5 2S GAL KILL CANCPTi MLTFLE TRLAKSIPLAANE N CONTAA@ OR GOLD N OEVDROP OJMWA 4Pp54S STAtDAW 5 OA f 10 GAL M LL CANOPriSTAFDARDPLANT N COWAN % 2F CARDBOARD PAW ZA&MA MARAACIA 30V 3V 7 GAL PLLLA TFLI P Wf5F1.CM N CONfAW TOP TCPIART MWIIA MTR A TOPIARY 5 CA 36' 0 GAL PllLls°CCuCiIAILTitE T4l)JCS TG xr ma 11E1ABBiG1A GRANDFLORA NIA VA 3 GAL FLLUN M=W "TW TRB.' :S1pLMR N CONTAN3E TJ CO 'I!=ATE .AS" TRAC3aOSR30,9AA JASA NOIOM NA NIA 3 GAL PLLU NWTE SLOOWVRIW TRCLG MLANT IN OCNTANR BERMELLO •AJAMIL & PARTNERS-INC �a not S. Ma.e... Be_ SWI. loon Y1.W. E1.e14 =133 (=I s9-NOA A pa) NA -Ed Aw V Y WMNit o.MG! mum MUCK=R L� �.n. �auUMama. M L Y7A.n M.. ww 1 .KIK 0 ]LAIN E LlA FL l wlO -M AK AACMTECT .[G M0. OOoI242Nt . iw N.,IIc TERREMARK BRICKELL 11 I wr ►w j i Ctrs. Nw 971L002 9� 11r. 1'-A' 0— OCT. 311997 m— vL CA-Y.0 P. CAN 19N SEE BEW. AnrA nu. BALL ROOM GARDEN TERRACE L-3 PLANT LIST m anRnn cau �..r.e eorM.vA RY! Lewf VWAn CMDnM MAN= R. CAM QAVA PsC urraWe CQA E sss ALL CAW"AUMf AS SOM. Ol COCONS RAL.A DC$C 00oos MCrWA 1M'NM w" s w M.T_ Co"rommm rmMlf4AM.8 SOM. Ca PMN ARRE C1.aA WMA 60A s " P= CIIC"M"M1E 1WJ30MW As Saw R O. Tc.1R nQM sAONrA EGA s so RAL.lACsftw AS SCL-$ME rmm LL RJME QLM no Twou)'YaDWA05A IaoA s sm /UL.eAassOAM As 310— 614E TW.M PLANT LIST m auwnM na.o. RMe eodMea wre Lem saeA. ma11a �.ADa u noeA9A AIOrJL s AIMEDVCA r r r a+t R1t.11..rA' it OC eR "m spy, sM m sMa" lassos. E f is WL Ry qo, r pC a C.40mo.m Nut ZA pj umm 7f w 3 cM 0"Wi r m &.MrsRtw w aG r► c2arm m 'CAM" if u r a.L ft" LMW R,AMISP_W y CC. AO 'plop. Au,A..MOA OUIO...DA CAUVAMA WA WA OCOL RlyM11Y MWMLM AS SIDM. PYPODOCAMU 1000CIOU ACV d" N M' ,QO MAL^" W OC PLANT LIST ar CU. =004 d awmcr ww Imr maw Damon. M-" aDovaaLr9a u m umm Toozomm a w R a I DOL R1LVUW Ir.Cf •I• .v4oLs VAras6 N VWW sOlVu M s.AA@ O xr I mi. Rjj~ Kr Il Vmw MAOM"ur1101 O' w Ia& RAORAM W Of N w@A 'Rem"op" u u IPCOR. MLLOL" as SCW. rA 9OOLLLEYWlwmm 1..04LOSRW"A4AMSMTIIY' R R Ia. ft"o LAM aOG K AuawroA AYALYpA CAn.sfC. wA WA ]cAt Rll/M IDpiA 11111) :RMELLO-AJAMIL PARTNERS-INC S. sr+... C.f.. . lam .L flmd calm eeA-s1.1 ru (sosl eat-Io1 s. 4 vomit YASR s.uama a uL �R....Mras®.ASEssICIDOr) D L Lr.►... Dr. wr 1 .l a— r1aN M133 I I i 0�1 FL, LV.OSC11[ ARCW'[Cr RM w . M 0001142 bwi.nc _ — I _ _ I — — I TERREMARK BRICKELL II sE: K" i n� a. -a R. Inaaor o... car. 31.I,f1) ch. N aa.. f11. s¢ ma. On:{f1w SCULPTURE TERRACE AND HOTEL POOL LANDSCAPE PLAN n... s. L-4 —4 — B! 1 4 t h T! R R A C E IId1 eF.r —i — PROJECT CRITERIA aarw rrrn ..• Yam«ta�we•Mrpr rM ra aYJ•• a«Aar! MY • e• .• • r«v rrt r•« ro .nr . n«w r•.r r aruw u. rau Y,Y a1Mrw• P A«I «rw« -ZONING /SETBACKS /OVERVIEW aY• / •A a» ,» 1...' a V.r �� y �f. KYr Y W.wY V r / � . n•a • a4aar N araw raewa✓ PROJECT CRITERIA -FAR /PROGRAM BREAKDOWN PROJECT Y•«anr w• » or arm r rw •..�. Y arr �/..� rr a�il,a �� •.r �"-`.. e. �. a.r arar t..A aar y Y. m��.aww rorr w•o � Y•Y« •arr aarr«. CRITERIA - PARKING / LOADING .. �.. •� err r r w r . r w ..r n a.. w.. •a. 5 aa..a».a rwr.r ... aa... r •r.r rh ara rarer �.. r.rN.a aarrlro • «rf r r. aaI araw.t • a,.ra r. M '� � • �w» a••atY r ro. err• n.YaNLL YMr • Y.I. ~ l..ra r...- ..r /� aYt •ara >0»a, ,ala•La•• rw �+ Y era. aw. •err. aafaaw J. .. a»rw r .... r.rr � w •aY, ... ew.a w.r« ... w.aw r ........ s•»».t YYaY . nanr r awri r a. ... aaaur . r r tHVw . ti err taaa/y • r A ,a- a... aw � ra«w . r r rawwa4 W r . »wr r. . all rr rar.r aw .r. NYVaat MWY �. M•aaY r u ..aV»«••• Yr•t war � _ mriN+ ow r�•aw wr // narara. / •»•ro« .. �.»aA.r / r / ....r / .N .• ».w � r.w rrY a. _ Ara *WWI w. w ...rr •ww�« rorr ti a/.. .: ..•aar err. w / i/ ,///i it +. /i / 1 } m TE .- la BLUE Pmlm Sam i i � 9DI 1 ' (P■N 11 6, MBND PMNMC vAa NNOCAM VNI. wrm. Tyr, al NORTH BERMELLO•AJAMIL & PARTNERS-INC Ir.,o.aa not p. 11.1a IMw pally loop WW. PIrl4 33 XI two t■-20pp rM (■) !« N= Eq. Fa. Y mmil owwck 117REYAR[ p■C1R11 0 lJL (A /Ia114 IImLL•i parlaaaaMp) �: e.a.rwr.ntula■Anc p■a■u. a Iva.; U n«w. «vP«aur) not 1 lbmy ra pr- P«ILvaw 1 l'+wat Cr naA�a .311121 (ws) pEp-p=E00 ' 0 MLLY A SERMEUM RA C FL MM/ECt REC. NO.: M 0007200 Proj•r Rya. TERREMARK BRICKELL 11 PtN1 c__ N. 911E.= Aalc 1-.70'-0' o.Ir oc . 31, 1«, oft— so ce . v.f) CADO nt : srz avtrara p ', nu. GRNO./SITE PLAN a..t N. A-1.0 I 9 I I I 1 I— — -——-L�-- -- —- 4— -— -- -- -----r--- — •[ 1 4 t N T[[ N A C[ QQ Q Q O 00 I ti •+ \ \ \ I ak r' y. • � I � ' � III •1 I I i I 1 -L--------- --J- -- —�---------------_--I---- _ I I I - — `- - - — OIMANq BOON or �- _- ,. E — { _• twrOPtY flees ToOF SLOPID YT- i UJ ----- / AY1Y•I I N. Y. � o7_177TR 77771-1 FF1 / �/ I TMROOD TAL • InOAtts r I _ i, L. _� -[[L - _I — — �'f •--•--•—•--- — — — — — — — — — -- — — — — — — — — — I [[ 1 4 t n L A N[ / BERMELLO`AJAMIL & PARTNERS-INC not a K...e... mi- SW. Imo Yl.ml. I1w14 'N"O (zlI !M-kilo /Y (]m) NFYO• K.l, x• AI Cm/Ilt T:1 M �TMMMCWAXX oleamt n ILL (A Ih.14 ItsltM P.r<•.I.WP) (A rk M.refE IARK BIOQmJ. K 1•a, not K. B.'W— O=- P_Q_ I MyY A BfMli11O M �L MCMiER xfC. xd: M 000)700 Pry(.q N.r•s TERREMARK BRICKELL it GIB OCT. 31. '"7 n.... 18 Is a.:l nuc SECOND FLOOR PLAN- B.O.H ae«I x NORTH A-2.2 t t 1 4 It T t t 4 A C 9 a 1 ` —------------ �' \ e5� 11 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1++++++, 1 rl llllll+r+++t11 i ++'!'�'++t ttttt++++++ � ` :' '� w —"► TOP o aOiO F ON r 's t l : I 1 9 1 , I 77 OFAC[a TO V i l - I ' ► TOF tLOFO y I / II J �_U— -- 1..R V. / I I a R I ,. I TOTAL PAMPA / TAP FLOOR I. 201 E,AC[ / /Y ,/ —FLOOR M ' III—, —aatr— — IL BE I 4 It A LANE — — —f — — � BERMELLO•AJAMIL & PARTNERS-INC Arw1.wW. TRd.w.l.t n.wy �Yr OW' L::!= wme it01 A Yrtlen 0r1.. suw loco WeeY, Rind blb (m) as-mU ra (ma) ett-loft bt. b. Y C900412 o"MR: TmM6YARK elNomt u LLA U n.rw um+tw PerteRnY1P.) �: W.PeM1e.cTgaN.11C BlOtlmJ. 0 10ti e...... c...w n..we .misa (aae) mt-xot , i 0MRLV A tEAWE M RA rl n $TECr REO. NO_ M 0007200 TER ER MARK BRICKELL 11 NOT PWl n• / camel n. t)1t.w: !aW 20'-0- 0etc WT. 01. I"l Or•.e: SB CLueYM: V.8 CA00 nlr. SEE 3•1W Or.r'S T!". THIRD FLOOR PLAN BALLROOM/MTG. ss..t ne A-2.3 11 � it 11 I I, . I I i I 11 I I I III I R E 1 4 1 11 T E R R A C E 0 Dlo D v \ I : _--__------J.---ILL _ -- i ——_ — --_--- Orjs- ------- - - - - - _ ---- ---- _ TF1_L i -7 i u.. l ---j —\♦ Y I r T I y: II ! i I v 70y am Too OF BLOR1 - t- - -• ---- ---- ------7177777 77, — I i 1 7.. awces TO a. 1 UP I I / ILL Ir I I ~ TOTAL ►ARKING 'I I 57-1- ----"-I ---" -� - - - �---- - --- a..I. rw FLOOR . aO. NACBB i Q�--L=" --- _ -- ---- ---- - - -- - - - _ ---i-- r'- - �� ---=--- ------ -'I -- -- BE 1 4 t n L A M E ----il-- —— 4— -- -- -- —- —-�---—--kl----� l BERMELLO•AJAMIL & PARTNERS-INC i101 Da B.I9s... Olf� T111� 1000 ' YIW, IYMl. >71a , 97. Y. Y 0$Ili 0MR: w...mumluoc OpCip1 n Ixy «MMTN.n Dr. 'I t 05{-C700 0 M,EV A M"A110. N.A IL AWKIM NEC. Y .: m 00 7m Projsl N..,. TERREMARK BRICKELL II Csalm. Y. 9116.0pt O.t.: OCi. 11,:991 Dn.s: 58 CkskM: V.S CAOD Ill. SEE �W Dn:i nu. FOURTH FLOOR FITNESS CENTRE OFFICE SKY LOBBY 9a.w ... A-2.4 0 r � II O=�_Iqw UP 1 1 i O _ 1 f 1 i I ITYPICAL h A10 SCALE M12dV y TOTAL P11MKMN 4- TMIM ROOM . SW SPACES BERMELLO •AJAMIL & PARTNERS-INC W.Nr M.mWr I..YWI W— IMO l, flr14 ala (7EM MhiM /Y (m) YFMW Ey. Mw 4 O 12 0wxm TNUMAMK DMCML u IJL AEWY. 11s1tN p.rte.nMp) WS..EcTCM�I BNORLL 11 1—.i ♦ E1.EY....r.).) N01 1 M.Y.— t C tr. )..w n«la..ala 306) ae) M-aao I WNyY A Wj lK 0. RA n. •RO.)ECf REC. W4 M "mc, aei.0 Ns.c TERREMARK BRICKELL 11 My PW �.m4 Nw 9)t l.00l ra.: raa-o- r1.: OC). 21. v) OE..e v.B O...W: v.B C.1M0 nlw SEE 3E10. TYPICAL HOTEL FLOOR PLAN 5TH- 14TH A-3.0 0 0 Lem o- o- eW M o- & m TYPICAL. REMENTIAL FLOOR PLAN — 15TH —18TH SG48 r•=-a O 00 Q Q O o .1..,.Y..uY O fill) BERMELLO • AJAMIL & PARTNERS-INC ir.a. � i..rr 9nawc. a9o� B. r�rr. BNw Bull. �000 Yl.ml. IbrY. Sti9 rL RN Y 000MI1 " 09M[! TERFAMANO BYCXZU U Li (A Ib.IY 1 rw 9.M.e W) O.aMllO.rs:011dMR BBIOml B W., 9J01 i raw... Or. ►.�1t El.r 1 l�. ]0100 (=6) St 0�w.. (006) OBh0E00 ' 0 %VUY A BEAYEl10. R R MCI =r REG W.: M 0007200 R.wiss TERREMARK BRICKELL 11 Ysr ruY c— Y. 97,e002 90--0' YlL OCf. 91. 91 C.100 !th a.. as�weTe on: E nuc TYPICAL RESIDENTIAL FLOOR PLAN ® 9Ywa Y. NORTH A - 4.0 lo o- o- o-- o- - o-- o- o- o� 9CA(5 r•lp<r I I i 1 11111 BERMELLO • AJAMIL & PARTNERS-INC � W aml S. a F"— on.. 3w . Imo n . n.n...31M (xs) m mm ru (se) _+ TERREMARK BRICKELL II CONCEPTUAL DESIGN K" PL1 l( C.mm. Me. 91100] SW. As SMM1 ]N.. Oct. 31. s? ce..ar: rs GOD m. sa O.rr* o . s nu« OFFICE TRANSFER 19TH FLOOR NOF7TH A-5-T BERMELLO-AJAMIL & PARTNERS-INC i i 2w1. loon RIW. Wane. a133 � (a91 r►2ow ru po91 N2-99o2 RW u N Noor12 o"M TODIOI.R2 laic=. n W. (A n..w IIsrW pute.n I MUM 1 GRa.FRn2wet231112Y.Nt lMC1iQ1 Re.,i p n.na. OI O O O O O O O O ., 1 ""k— Dr., (306) (Dol) eel-aao o------ -- j - - - _ - --- --- - JW 2 - - - - - i --- I i II II I MOT@ REFER TO SHEET A-4.0 FOR RECREATION DECK T 1� �TECT REM rq Wa=7M Rwiiane RAIN 11.IR! TERREMARK BRICKELL 11 Cwa R. 91, m sw. m--D. D.- Dci. 31. 21 a-- va C.D/ nl. SEE smo Dn:9 nu. TYPICAL OFFICE FLOOR PLAN 20TH-32NO TYPICAL OFFICE FLOOR PLAN - 20TH - 32ST ® 2....., sck& r•2oa n1oFm-1 A-5.0 O Q Q QO g O Q O o---- -- -------------- - ' I1 a ---T -- -- ----- - -- - ? I - o-- - - ---�—f --- - - -- - - - - - - - - - _$ { I I i I SrAL& r-2(Y a 0 nrin i r==ii BERMELLO -AJAMIL & PARTNERS-INC w1o.1r i..r rniu ml as l.rMr. Oq�. a014 1000 l3o9, m9 rA (m) 91►9a09 A• a N CM12 a1'eim ula RSNmIM[ 3MCI LL 0 1 0 .TE. FL M09RCf A.L4 n0.: M 0007300 TERREMARK BRICKELL 11 w, PW I_ csa v. 9716.m aa. r-m•-o• o.1r oer. v. 9v orvr: v.a uee nw m ono+ u.an— TYPICAL UPPER OFFICE FLOOR PLAN 33RD -38TH MoPiTt•1 A-5.1 t BERMLLO•AJAPAL & PARTNERS-INC Items, vr<. w—wias n.mea elewe 0 gyp. AteW.elan MCI 3e. B.Y.h Del.. 3.It. 1000 Ilt.mL /land. 33133 (306) E60-30l0 Tlll (305) ass -am 2% Na M 000N12 OIINGt: TID ZWAR t ORKI= D " (A n.rta& hmltM p.nn.rrhip.) G.n.P.rtn es:T1�EMM BWCIMU D (ATl.rldn eer9e U—) 2"1 i B.T.h.re Dew ►.nth.... I C04"Ut Grope.. Tlertd..33333 0 NALLY A BERMEILO. RA FL ARCNOECT REO. NO.: AR OD07200 Proj.ct Nan+c TERMEMAM MCK&L IRT PLAN Carom, Bn 9714.002 3.. -- ]0'-0- D.l.: OCT 31,1"7 De.— aO a-t.d CARD AI.: SEE DAYSTWP Dr.Yd Tali nLqLDM IMATIONS -- -- M190-4 Sh - M Ne. iEz A-6.0 1 BER0 •AJANNL & PARTNERS-INC 2001 S. B.Y. _ D_ Suit+ 1000 lD.me Fl-i" 33133 MW0 009-2M EAZ (=I 009-92D0 U& R N 0000412 O"M my=" R BBICML D LC l Ibtid. Bmittd 9.rta.nyy. re.p.rte.n:TIItADfAB( B@CXM C !Ot 1. B.neon m- ., t faeu0t G— Tl 1" 33102 0 BILLY A. BERMELLO. RA FL ARCNffEQ REG. NO.: AR 000720 IDLY FEAR t Comte. K. 9710.002 9e.lc ,- DO'-O' D.t�. OCT 31.1997 0 0.0 Ch..k.@ CARD FU.: SEE DAYST-P Dr V4 TRls MULDM EMATION8 SCA6 N3C4 Sb.t . o. A-6.Oa 0 �9vmr In �v2q, BERNELLO•AJAPAL & PARTNERS-INC 91eW1 _ c b_ft, P1_., bM— D1w0. L-d— . -ea� 2001 ea 8.A6.e. O. 9 low W.W. 11.." 33133 (300) mh206O PA3 (305) 011-" aq, R. m coema owmm D tR d" ..ty9..tla) '0 i 9.,A t. Dr, 1t1— t ..a 0ro... 71.e16..33133 0 Y Y A KYWU O. Rw fti M HMCt RM NO.: AR 0007200 XV PLAN Camm. Ha 9716.000 tale 1'-30'-S D.ta OC7 27.1997 0e..e: 80 CIDD FU.: SC[ arLO Dn.'0 Yttta EMATION ELEVAT10N8 SCAB M130-Q A-6.7 BERMELLO•AJAMIL & PARTNERS-INC hl.1r D dp I. M= not S.. e.r.hor. D._ Su14 1000 IdaE* rloll0. 33133 (006) a 206o rA[ (905) SO -OM lb% N. AA Ctl tz 0WHIM TEMUKIM WUCIMLL D ul. U ►I.Ma DmItAA ►Vtn.SJUCKL (A n. BAIC1DIIl. C z"l I e.T h— DT, P..— 1 5oo►e9l G— rle " 33I30 Prejlet HWn.: TapilEMAM BMCKELL 5 IKEY KAN � r— No. 9716.002 SW.: Y-SO'-0" D.lr. OCT 3%1991 D_ 9.0 Ch-k : V.S CADD RI.: RC SCLC•. D—'g TIU. ELEVATION ( to - Me 4. Ilk omm ;CZSh..l No. M13Q4 A-6.2 0 BERNELLO•AJANRL & PARTNERS-INC m. D.1p u ..r. r.w..... MI 9e. 9q.en.. Orh. 3m 1000 1a.m1, /toted. 39103 {am) eea-asm FAX (oro) WS-9 otmee crimum BRXMu D L e t florid. Unit.d pWn.r.hip.) t rl f oer9er.U_) sot & a.nser. or.. .nt1.— 1 .n..et are... 11.1d..03179 0 .RLr & BERMELI0. RA FL ARCWECi REG. M.: M 0007200 KEY PUN �8 i C. M. 9716.002 9o.lc - OO'-or D.t. OCT 27.1991 Dr 9.G Cu..r d: CADD ru.: SEE DAVSrA Dr..'s My BUILDING ELEVATION Stu.t Ro. A-6.3 n BERIVELLO -AJAWL & PARTNERS-INC 1r.6...We. amm. Au r1..m.9 11 0.11 Wrier. YeeReca.. mt 6. B.r.e.r. on.. bun. 1000 MWA rwn6. 03t36 (096) msP 2 o ra (3m) ma-aee rsf.u0D 12 ow"m TCRRZUAPX BBx= a to (A rH.ta limlt.d wKR•••►iPJ (A Flom O. V—tl.a) 2601 1 Myot. P..Ah— I C—ld OP..., rlM" .201= 0 MLLT A 9CR1*UO. RA FL ARCWMCT REG. NO.: M 000720C Rw:aoe Proj.et INn� ARK SNICKiLL tar PLAN I Comm. M . 9716.002 0W. - 30'-0' D.Ir. oC? all 1997 D__ 6.G CR..Ic.i CADD VD.: SEE DATST-P Drsw'9 SI[la WCTM SCAM MO4 A-7.0 SECTM SCANS M130-a BERMELLO-AJAMIL & PARTNERS-INC —WL-ta-- sdm..-mi n---1-9 2801 S . 7"-e--. 1*— mdt. 1000 )a.m: F1.6" 7717E (7E6) 66► =" RJ[ (us) 669-mw yN-um 12 01rN x CRl¢NAIM MtLl 1 D ttd. -p-A-.--l9RFXM E 3MCKLU. D I 1 ntN9l. m P_n ) 301 i Bq-h.n Dr, -U.— 1 —m G.— na11d..E7177 0 'MLLY A WtK4 LO. RA fL MCWr=T RM_ NO.: M 0007200 RwN_ Proj-et TLVIEMRK @MCKM L Ce Nw 9716.002 D-t. OCT 31,1997 Dn-¢ IG Ck.ek.@ V.D CADD PU.: Sa BQG. DnYd title A-7.1