Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutR-98-0089J-98-76 1/27/98 RESOLUTION NO. 9 8 — 89 A RESOLUTION, WITH ATTACHMENTS, APPROVING WITH CONDITIONS, A MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT PURSUANT TO ARTICLES 13 AND 17 OF ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 11000, FOR THE AMERICAN AIRLINES ARENA PROJECT, TO BE LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY 601 BISCAYNE BOULEVARD, MIAMI, FLORIDA; TO BE COMPRISED OF A MULTI -PURPOSE ARENA WITH NOT MORE THAN 24,000 ATTRACTION SEATS, 37,500 SQUARE FEET OF OFFICE SPACE, 40,000 SQUARE FEET OF ACCESSORY COMMERCIAL SPACE AND 1,147 PARKING SPACES; DIRECTING TRANSMITTAL OF THE HEREIN RESOLUTION; MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATING CONCLUSIONS OF LAW; PROVIDING FOR BINDING EFFECT; CONTAINING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, on November 5, 1997, Basketball Properties, Ltd., ("APPLICANT"), submitted a complete Application for Special Exception and Major Use Special Permit for the American Airlines Arena Project ("PROJECT") pursuant to Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, Articles 13 and 17, as amended, for the property located at approximately 601 Biscayne Boulevard, Miami, Florida, as legally described in "Exhibit All; and WHEREAS, development of the PROJECT requires the issuance of a Major Use Special Permit pursuant to Article 17 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended; and ATTACHMENT�� CONTAINED p CITY CORMSION MEETING OF JAN 2 7 1998 Resolution No. P�- 89 WHEREAS, the Large Scale Development Committee met on September 8, 1997 to review the proposed PROJECT and offer its input regarding technical issues involved; and WHEREAS, the APPLICANT has modified the development plans accordingly to reflect the issues raised at said Large Scale Development Committee meeting; and WHEREAS, the PROJECT was reviewed by the Urban Development Review Board at its meeting of October 22, 1997, and recommended for approval with conditions pertaining to the plaza area along Biscayne Boulevard, the perimeter areas and linkage issues; and WHEREAS, the Miami Planning Advisory Board, at its meeting of December 17, 1997, Item No. 4, following an advertised public hearing, adopted Resolution No. PAB 77-97 by a vote of five to zero (5-0), RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of the Major Use Special Permit Development Order as attached hereto, subject to APPLICANT complying with all conditions of the Development Order for the PROJECT; and WHEREAS, the City Commission deems it advisable and in the best interest of the general welfare of the City of Miami to issue a Major Use Special Permit Development Order for the PROJECT as hereinafter set forth; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. The recitals and findings contained in the Preamble to this Resolution are hereby adopted by reference - 2 - V. 89 thereto and incorporated herein as if fully set forth in this Section. Section 2. A Major Use Special Permit Development Order, attached hereto as Exhibit "B" and made a part hereof, is hereby approved subject to the conditions specified in said Development Order, per Article 17 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, as amended, for the American Airlines Arena Project (hereinafter referred to as the "PROJECT") to be developed by Basketball Properties, Ltd. ("APPLICANT"), at approximately 601 Biscayne Boulevard, Miami, Florida, more particularly described in "Exhibit All, attached hereto and made a part hereof. Section 3. The PROJECT is hereby approved for the construction of up to 24,000 attraction seats, 37,500 square feet of office space, 40,000 square feet of accessory commercial space and 1,147 parking spaces. Section 4. The Major Use Special Permit Application for the American Airlines Arena Project also encompasses the lower ranking Special Permits as set forth in the Development Order, attached as Exhibit "B" hereto and incorporated herein. Section 5. The findings of fact set forth below are hereby made with respect to the subject PROJECT: a. The PROJECT is in conformity with the adopted Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000, as amended. b. The PROJECT is in accord with the PR Zoning classifications of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended. - 3 - 98- 89 C. Pursuant to Section 1305 of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, the specific site plan aspects of the PROJECT, i.e., ingress and egress, parking, signs and lighting, utilities, drainage, preservation of natural features and control of potentially adverse effects generally, have been considered and will be further considered administratively during the process of issuing a building permit and a certificate of occupancy. d. The PROJECT is expected to cost approximately $176 million, and to employ approximately 2,500 workers (900 of which would come from the City of Miami) during construction (FTE), and approximately 1,200 recurring jobs within the City of Miami. The PROJECT will generate approximately $87 million annually in direct spending related to the Miami Heat (this includes tickets, concessions, hotels, restaurants and other establishments; 1997 dollars). e. The City Commission further finds that: (1) the PROJECT will have a favorable impact on the economy of the City; (2) the PROJECT will efficiently use public transportation facilities; (3) any potentially adverse effects of the PROJECT will be mitigated through compliance with the conditions of this Major Use Special Permit; - 4 - 98- 89 (4) the PROJECT will efficiently use necessary public facilities; (5) the PROJECT will not negatively impact the environment and natural resources of. the City; (6) the PROJECT will not adversely affect living conditions in the neighborhood; (7) the PROJECT will not adversely affect public safety; (8) based on the record presented and evidence presented, the public welfare will be served by the PROJECT; and (9) any potentially adverse effects of the PROJECT arising from safety and security, fire protection and life safety, solid waste, heritage conservation, trees, shoreline development, minority participation and employment, and minority contractor/ subcontractor participation will be mitigated through compliance with the conditions of this Major Use Special Permit. Section 6. The Major Use Special Permit, as approved and amended, shall be binding upon the applicants and any successors in interest. Section 7. The application for Major Use Special Permit, which was submitted on November 5, 1997, and on file with the Department of Planning and Development of the City Of Miami, - 5 - Florida, shall be relied upon generally for administrative interpretations and is made a part hereof by reference. Section 8. This Major Use Special Permit will expire two (2) years from its effective date which is thirty (30) days after the adoption of the herein Resolution. Section 9. The City Manager is hereby directed to instruct the Director of the Department of Planning and Development to transmit a copy of this Resolution and attachment to the developers: Basketball Properties, Ltd., One S.E. 3rd Avenue, Suite 2300, Miami, F1. 33131. Section 10. The Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law are made with respect to the Project as described in the Development Order for the American Airlines Arena Project, which is attached hereto as Exhibit "B" and made a part hereof by reference. Section 11. The Major Use Special Permit Development Order for the American Airlines Arena Project (Exhibit "B") is hereby granted and issued. Section 12. In the event that any portion or section of this Resolution or the Development Order (Exhibit "B") is determined to be invalid, illegal, or unconstitutional by a court or agency of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall in no manner affect the remaining portions of this Resolution or Development Order (Exhibit "B") which shall remain in full force and effect. Section 13. This Resolution shall become effective thirty (30) days after its adoption. - 6 - 58- 89 PASSED AND ADOPTED this 27th day of January , 1998. XAVIER L. SUAREZ, MAYOR In accordance with Miami Cede Sec. 2-33, since the Mayor did not indicate approval of this legislation by signing it in the designated place provided, said legislation now becomes effective with the elapse of ten (10) days from the date of Commission action regarding same, without the Mayor exercising a v to. / ATTEST: Wa r .6. F m , City Clerk WALTER J. FOEMAN, CITY CLERK PREPARED AND APPROVED BY: GEORGE, . WYSONG III ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: EDWARD MA .IM CITY A W2175:GKW:BSS - 7 - 9.S- 89 EXHIBIT "A" THE PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION A tract of land in section 37, Townships 53 and 54 South, Range 42 East, in Section 31, Township 53 South, Range 42 East and Section 6, Township 54 South, Range 42 East, said tract of land lying, situate and being in the City of Miami, Dade County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows: COMMENCE at the point of intersection of the Easterly extension of the Centerline of 3`d Street (now known as N.E. 9`' Street) as shown on the plat of A. L. KNOWLTON S MAP OF MIAMI, according to the plat thereof recorded in plat Book " B " at page 41 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, with the Easterly right of way boundary of BISCAYNE BOULEVARD, said Easterly right of way boundary of BISCAYNE BOULEVARD being parallel with and 53 feet Easterly of as measured at right angles to, the Easterly right of way boundary of BISCAYNE DRIVE as shown on said A.L. KNOWLTONS MAP OF MIAMI; thence run South 00° 04' 29" West along said Easterly right of way boundary of Biscayne Boulevard a distance of 318.83 feet to the point of intersection with a line lying 6.25 feet North of and parallel with the Easterly+ prolongation of the North right of way Boundary of a Street (now known as N.E. 8 Street) as shown on said plat of A.L. KNOWLTONS MAP OF MIAMI, said point of intersection also being the POINT OF BEGINNING of the parcel of land hereinafter described; thence run South 89° 57' 43" East along said line lying 6.25 feet North of and parallel with the Easterly prolongation of the North right of way boundary of 4 h Street( now known as N.E. 80' Street), a distance of 1038.30 feet to a point lying 315.29 feet Westerly of , as measured at right angles to, the BULKHEAD LINE as shown on REVISED PLAT OF SHEET 3 - METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA BULKHEAD LINE - PART THREE, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 74 at page 18 of the Public Records of Dade County Florida, thence run, perpendicular to the last described course, South 00° 02' 17" West for a distance of 618.94 feet to a point, said point lying 135.91 feet North of as measured at right angles to, the Easterly extension of the Southerly right of way boundary of 6`b Street (now known as N.E. 6`h Street) as shown on said plat of A.L. KNOWLTONS MAP OF MIAMI; thence run South 85° 40' 53" West a distance of 220.60 feet to a point of deflection; thence run South 87' 28' 45" West a distance of 190.87 feet to a point of deflection; thence run South 85' 04' 25" West a distance of 208.28 feet to a point of deflection, said point of deflection also to be known as POINT " A " for purposes of this description; thence run South 810 57' 30" West a distance of 208.28 feet to the point of curvature of a circular curve to the right; thence run Westerly and Northwesterly along the arc of said circular curve to the right, having a radius of 55.00 feet, through a central angle of 760 2 P 01 ", for an arc distance of 73.29 feet; thence run North 21' 41' 29" West, tangent to the last described curve, a distance of 294.95 feet to a point of deflection; A-1 � q�-- S9 thence run North 16' 20' 23" West a distance of 139.23 feet to the point of intersection with the Easterly right of way boundary of BISCAYNE BOULEVARD, said Easterly right of way boundary of BISCAYNE BOULEVARD being parallel with and 53 feet Easterly of, as measured at right angles to, the Easterly right of way boundary of said BISCAYNE DRIVE, said last eight (8) described courses being along the Northerly right of way boundary of PORT BOULEVARD as described in Official Records Book 13849 at page 1026 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida; thence run North 010 57' 43" West, along said Easterly right of way boundary of BISCAYNE BOULEVARD, a distance of 191.96 feet to a point of deflection; thence run North 00' 04' 29" East, along said Easterly right of way boundary of BISCAYNE BOULEVARD, a distance of 58.01 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; together with all riparian rights appertaining thereto and together with all existing seawalls, bulkheads, docks, fill and upland improvements extending from the aforesaid property Easterly into Biscayne Bay; LESS AND EXCEPTING THEREFROM the following described 30 foot wide trace of Land lying 15.00 feet on each side of the centerline of the Florida East Coast Railway Company's Spur Tract No. 181 serving Dodge Island Seaport, but including all air rights to said Tract beginning 23 feet above the top of the rails, and being more particularly described as follows: COMMENCE at the aforesaid described point "A"; thence run South 81' 5T 30" West, along the Northerly right of way boundary of said PORT BOULEVARD, for a distance of 1.95 feet to the point of intersection with a line that is parallel with and 15.00 feet Northeasterly o� as measured at right angles to, the centerline of said Railway's Spur Tract No. 181, and the POINT OF BEGINNING of the parcel of land hereinafter described; thence run North 70' 58' 03" West, along the line that is parallel with and 15.00 feet Northeasterly of, as measured at right angles to, the centerline of said Railway's Spur Tract No. 181, a distance of 298.58 feet to the point of curvature of a circular curve to the left; thence Westerly along the arc of said circular curve to the left, having a radius of 506.31 feet, through a central angle of 02' 23' 03.5", for an arc distance of 21.07 feet to the point of intersection with the Northeasterly right of way boundary of said PORT BOULEVARD, said point of intersection bearing North 16° 38' 53.5" East from the center of said curve; thence run South 21° 41' 29" East, along said Northeasterly right of way boundary of PORT BOULEVARD, a distance of 39.01 feet to the point of intersection with a line that is 15.00 feet Southwesterly o& as measured at right angles to, the centerline of said Railway's Spur Tract No. 181; thence run South 700 58' 03" East, along the last described line, a distance of 235.49 feet to the point of intersection with the Northerly right of way boundary of said PORT BOULEVARD; thence run North 81' 5T 30" East, along the Northerly right of way boundary of said PORT BOULEVARD, a distance of 65.91 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing 14.63 acres, more or less. A-2 9q-- 89 EXHIBIT "B" DEVELOPMENT ORDER ATTACHMENT TO RESOLUTION NO. DATE: AMERICAN AIRLINES ARENA PROJECT MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT DEVELOPMENT ORDER Let it be known that pursuant to Articles 13 and 17 of Ordinance No. 11000, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended, the Commission of the City of Miami, Florida, has considered in a public hearing, the issuance of a Major Use Special Permit for the American Airlines Arena Project (hereinafter referred to as the "PROJECT") to be located at approximately 601 Biscayne Boulevard, Miami, Florida; see legal description in "Exhibit All, attached hereto and made a part hereof; said legal description is subject to any dedications, limitations, restrictions, reservations or easements of record. After due consideration of the recommendations of the Zoning Board and Planning Advisory Board and after due consideration of the consistency of this proposed development with the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan, the City Commission has approved the PROJECT, and subject to the following conditions approves the major Use Special Permit and hereby issues this Permit: B-1 9 R - 89 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The proposed American Airlines Arena Project is a multi -purpose arena mixed use development to be located at approximately 601 Biscayne Boulevard, Miami, Florida; ("PROJECT"). The PROJECT is located on approximately 21.39 gross acres and 15.13 net acres of land (more specifically described in "Exhibit All, incorporated herein by reference). The remainder of the PROJECT' s VITAL DATA is attached hereto as "EXHIBIT C11, and incorporated herein by reference. The proposed PROJECT will consist of 24,000 attraction seats, 37,500 square feet of office space, 40,000 square feet of accessory commercial space and 1,147 parking spaces. The PROJECT will consist of a 1,415,921 gross square foot multi -use center which has been designed as a Waterfront Specialty Center. The Arena is to be a state-of-the-art, multi- use major public facility designed and constructed in conformity with current National Basketball Association ("NBA") standards and the current standards of the International Hockey League ("IHL") and the American Hockey League ("AHL") and shall include, without limitation, marshaling/loading areas, planned, designed and constructed to support the occupancy of professional basketball and professional hockey franchises and to host other events such as family shows, concerts, live theater, etc.. The Arena component shall be a building containing a minimum of B-2 - 89 680,000 square feet of space with at least three concourses, as well as mechanical and service levels and shall include appropriate amenities, such as clubs, restaurants and shops. The ownership, operation and maintenance of common areas and facilities will be by the property owner or a mandatory property owner association in perpetuity pursuant to a recorded Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions. The Major Use Special Permit Application for the American Airlines Arena Project also includes a request to modify the provisions of City Charter Section 3(mm)(ii) in order to modify the aggregate yard area providing open views to the bay from twenty five percent (25%)(158.38 ft.) required to thirteen and eight tenths percent (13.8%) (87.72 ft.) provided. The Major Use Special Permit Application for the American Airlines Arena Project has a companion application for Special Exceptions to allow the following: Special Exception with City Commission approval, per Article 4, Section 401, to allow restaurant/retail uses in the PR Zoning District; Special Exception, with City Commission approval, per Article 9, Section 918, to allow up to twenty five percent (25%) of required parking to be located offsite; applicant proposes to locate seventeen percent (17%) offsite). The Major Use Special Permit Application for the American Airlines Arena Project also encompasses the following lower ranking Special Permits: B-3 58- 89 CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT per Article 4, Section 401, for signage in a PR Zoning District; CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT per Article 9, Section 917.1.2, for Valet Service; CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 15, Section 1511, for new construction Biscayne Boulevard and Biscayne Bay; CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT to waive the requirements of the Dade County Landscape Ordinance; Pursuant to Articles 13 and 17 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, approval of the requested Major Use Special Permit shall be considered sufficient for the subordinate permits and referenced above. The Project shall be constructed substantially in accordance with plans and design schematics on file prepared by Arquitectonica, dated November 1997; the landscape plan shall be implemented substantially in accordance with plans and design schematics on file prepared by Curtis & Rogers Design Studios, Inc., dated November 1997; said design and landscape plans may be permitted to be modified only to the extent necessary to comply with the conditions for approval imposed herein; all modifications shall be subject to the review and approval of the Director of the Department of Planning and Development prior to the issuance of any building permits. The PROJECT conforms to the requirements of the PR Zoning Districts, as contained in Ordinance No. 11000, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended. B-4 98- 89 The existing comprehensive plan future land use designation allows the proposed mix and intensity of attraction and commercial uses. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT THE APPLICANT, ITS SUCCESSORS, AND/OR ASSIGNS, JOINTLY OR SEVERALLY, SHALL DO THE FOLLOWING: 1. Meet all applicable building codes, land development regulations, ordinances and other laws. 2. Provide a list of agencies from which approvals and/or permits must be obtained prior to initiation of development and the permit or approval required of each. 3. Allow the Miami Police Department to conduct a security survey, at the option of the Department, and to make recommendations concerning security measures and systems; further submit a report to the Planning Department, prior to commencement of construction, demonstrating how the Police Department recommendations, if any, have been incorporated into the PROJECT security and construction plans, or demonstrate to the Planning Director why such recommendations are impractical. 4. Provide a letter from the Department of Fire -Rescue indicating APPLICANT'S coordination with members of the Fire Plan Review Section at the Department of Fire -Rescue for the review of the scope of the PROJECT, owner responsibility, building development process and review procedures, as well as specific requirements for fire protection and life safety systems, egress, vehicular access and water supply. 5. Provide a letter of assurance from the Solid Waste Department that the PROJECT has addressed all concerns of the said Department. B-5 98- 89 6. Prepare a Minority Participation and Employment Plan to be submitted to the City's Director of Minority and Women Business Affairs for review and comments, with the understanding that the City's Minority/Women Business Affairs and Procurement Ordinance No. 10538 is a guide that the APPLICANT must use its best efforts to follow. 7. Prepare a Minority Contractor/Subcontractor Participation Plan to the City's Director of Minority and Women Business Affairs for review and comment, with the understanding that the City's Minority/Women Business Affairs and Procurement Ordinance No. 10538 is a guide that the APPLICANT must use its best efforts to follow. 8. Record in the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, a Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions providing that the ownership, operation and maintenance of all common areas and facilities will be by the property owner or a mandatory property owner association in perpetuity. 9. Record a certified copy of the development order with the Clerk of the Dade County Circuit Court specifying that the Development Order runs with the land and is binding on the Applicant, its successors, and assigns, jointly or severally. 10. Provide the City with an executed, recordable unity of title or covenant in -lieu of unity of title agreement for the subject property; said agreement shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Attorney's Office. 11. Provide the Public Works Department of the City of Miami with plans for proposed sidewalk and swale area improvements for their review and approval prior to the issuance of a building permit. 12. Provide the Department of Planning and Development with a temporary parking plan which addresses construction employee parking and temporary parking arrangements for the existing building during the construction period; said plan shall be subject to the review and approval by the Department prior to the issuance of any building permits. B-6 98- 89 13. Address the concerns of the Urban Development Review Board regarding the plaza area along Biscayne Boulevard, the perimeter areas and linkage issues; any plan modifications shall be subject to review and approval by the Director of the Department of Planning and Development prior to the issuance of a building permit. 14. With the exception of the signs specifically included in the application for development approval (Section 8 of the Application book on file with the Department of Planning and Development), all other sign proposals shall be subject to a separate review and approval by the Director of the Department of Planning and Development (note: said review and approval does not require a separate Class II Special Permit) . 15. Pursuant to the comments received by the Zoning Division, the applicant shall submit a survey and site plan for offsite parking spaces showing location and design of the parking lot(s); said lot(s) shall meet distance requirements as specified in Zoning Ordinance No. 11000. 16. Pursuant to the comments received by the Zoning Division, all driving lanes to be located on parcel "B" shall have a minimum width of ten feet (10'-011) and must comply with FDOT turn radius standards. 17. The proposed project shall be subject to the review and approval (with conditions, if applicable) of the Miami -Dade County Shoreline Development Review Committee. 18. Pursuant to the traffic study which was submitted by the applicant as part of this approval, a complete "Traffic Control Management Plan" shall be produced and submitted to the City of Miami for review and approval by the City Commission prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy (CO) or a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy (TCO) for this project; said plan shall address all issues related to traffic control measures which will be utilized by the applicant during major arena events. B-7 - 89 19. Pursuant to concerns raised by the Downtown Development Authority regarding linkage issues to and from the proposed arena to the remainder of Downtown Miami (across Biscayne Boulevard), the applicant shall address the following issues throughout the permitting and construction period: a. Identification of approximately 4600 off -site parking spaces within a 10 minute walking radius of the project. b. Identification of approximately 2000 off -site parking spaces within a 5 to 10 minute shuttle bus connection to the project c. Identification of the principal transit station connections within a 10 minute walking radius to the project. d. Identification of on-site/site perimeter Metrobus, charter bus and shuttle bus loading locations and circulation patterns serving the project. e. Identification of downtown area primary pedestrian pathways interconnecting parking, transit and core area employee/resident concentrations with the project. f. Identification of primary routes for shuttle and bus connections between remote parking, transit and area employee/neighborhood centers. g. Identification of environmental design and enhancement measures that address improvements to pedestrian pathways including lighting, security, aesthetic enhancements, crosswalks (with particular emphasis on Biscayne Boulevard), pedestrian signalization and signage. h. Identification of financial and operational responsibility for shuttle bus operations linking the project to public transit and parking facilities. B-8 58- S9 i. Design and operational impact issues of a pedestrian bridge connection from the arena project to Bayside and Bayfront Park. j. Design and operational impact issues of surface road improvements to south side of Port Boulevard adjacent to Bayside project. k. Design and linkage issues of connecting a public baywalk along the bulkhead line of the FEC tract to existing and proposed baywalks to the public park lands to the south and north of the project. 1. Identification of "pathfinder" signage design and locations for pedestrian and vehicular traffic accessing the project through adjacent downtown areas including the Flagler Street core, Biscayne Boulevard, S.E. Overtown/Park West and Omni/Cultural Center districts. m. Identification of amount and location of employee parking accommodations. 20. Execute a "First Source Hiring Agreement" with the City that ensures that first preference for employment shall be given to neighborhood residents, and second preference to City residents; the agreement shall include a provision for construction activity jobs as well as permanent employment positions. 21. The applicant shall continue to actively participate in the City's Parks program. 22. Any and all amenities, including parking, that the applicant is providing to officials from Miami -Dade County shall likewise be provided to the City. In addition to the conditions enumerated above, the applicant shall work cooperatively with the City of Miami and Miami -Dade County to comply with the following: 1. Compliance with all conditions and stipulations of the tri-party agreement. �'� 98- 89 2. Compliance with all conditions and stipulations set forth in the City of Miami/Miami-Dade County Purchase and Sale Agreement for the subject property. 3. Compliance with all conditions and stipulations set forth in the covenants running with the property as executed and recorded. THE CITY SHALL: 1. Subject to payment of all applicable fees due, establish the effective date of this Permit as being thirty (30) days from the date of its issuance with the issuance date constituting the commencement of the thirty (30) day period to appeal from the provisions of the Permit. The American Airlines Arena Project, proposed by the applicant, Basketball Properties, Ltd., ("Applicant"), complies with the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000, is consistent with the orderly development and goals of the City of Miami, and complies with local land development regulations, and further, pursuant to Section 1703 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000: (1) the PROJECT will have a favorable impact on the economy of the City; and (2) the PROJECT will efficiently use public transportation facilities; and B-10 JS- 89 (3) the PROJECT will favorably affect the need for people to find adequate housing reasonably accessible to their places of employment; and (4) the PROJECT will efficiently use necessary public facilities; and (5) the PROJECT will not negatively impact the environment and natural resources of the City; and (6) the PROJECT will not adversely affect public safety; and (7) the public welfare will be served by the PROJECT; and (8) any potentially adverse effects of the PROJECT will be mitigated through conditions of this Major Use Special Permit. The proposed development does not unreasonably interfere with the achievement of the objectives of the adopted State Land Development Plan applicable to the City of Miami. Pursuant to Section 1305 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, the specific site plan aspects of the PROJECT, i.e., ingress and egress, offstreet parking and loading, refuse and service areas, signs and lighting, utilities, drainage and control of potentially adverse effects generally, have been considered and will be further considered administratively B-11 � 9 - 89 during the process of issuing individual building permits and certificates of occupancy. B-12 9S- 89 EXHIBIT "C" PROJECT DATA CALCULATIONS: 1. SITE DATA: A. ZONING: CITY OF MIAMI- "PR" PARKS, RECREATION & OPEN SPACE. B. SITE "A": 637,283 S.F. OR 14.63 ACRES. (NET) 913,560 S.F. OR 20.97 ACRES. (GROSS) C. OPEN SPACE: 261,542 S.F. OR 6.00 ACRES (SITE A). 2. BUILDING AREAS: GROSS NET A. PARKING LEVEL 4'-0": 449,955 S.F. 446,987 S.F. * 980 TOTAL SPACES (963+ 17 ACCESS.) B. EVENT LEVEL 14'-9" : 194,365 S.F. 172,859 S.F. EVENT PARKING 73,306 S.F. 67,753 S.F. * 167 TOTAL (162+ 5 ACCESS.) RETAIL 14,232 S.F. 14,232 S.F. SERVICE CORRIDOR 3,963 S.F. 3,963 S.F. * ARCADE 3,256 S.F. ** C-1 q�z_ - 9 GROSS NET C. MEZZ. LEVEL 27'-9" : 28,305 S.F. 20,716 S.F. PRACTICE COURT 11,055 S.F. 11,055 S.F. PRAC. COURT BALCONY 1,420 S.F. ** OFFICES 34,433 S.F. 34,433 S.F. OFFICE TERRACE 7,715 S.F. ** RETAIL / RESTAURANT 9,902 S.F. 9,902 S.F. TERRACE 56,793 S.F. *' D. MAIN CONCOURSE 41'-6" : 88,390 S.F. 71,317 S.F. PLAZA 50,936 S.F. ** RETAIL / RESTAURANT 9,902 S.F. 9,902 S.F. E. SUITE LEVEL 56'-9" : 88,151 S.F. 63,158 S.F. F. UPPER CONCOURSE 70'-5" : 68,841 S.F. 52,391 S.F. G. BALCONY LEVEL 85'-3" : 48,215 S.F. 32,191 S.F. H. UPPER SEATING 11T-11" : 30,738 S.F. 17,787 S.F. I. MECHANICAL LEVEL 125'-11": 30,714 S.F. 14,703 S.F. J. ARENA BOWL: 121,236 S.F. 121,236 S.F. * AREAS NOT INCLUDED IN S.F. SUB -TOTAL FOR THE PURPOSE OF DETERMINING THE PARKING COUNT REQUIRED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OFMIAMI. SUB -TOTAL- 1,305,703 S.F. ** 631,179 S.F. TOTAL- 1,425,823 S.F. 1,164,585 S.F. ** AREAS NOT INCLUDED ARE AS FOLLOWS: ARCADES, PLAZAS, TERRACES, ETC. C-2 gs- 89 3. BUILDING HEIGHT: REQUIRED: PROVIDED: 4. SETBACKS: NO HEIGHT LIMITATION 167'-0" +/- AT MAX. ELEV. REQUIRED: NOT APPLICABLE (N/A) PROVIDED: (TAKEN FROM MAIN ARENA BUILDING) NORTH- 77'-9"'+/- SOUTH- 184'-6"+/- EAST- 320'-0"+/- TO EDGE OF EAST PROPERTY LINE (SITE "A") 641'-8"+/- TO BULKHEAD WEST- 174'-1"+/- TO ARENA PROPERTY LINE 5. PARKING: TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED: TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED: 6. OFFSTREET LOADING: LOADING BERTHS REQUIRED: LOADING BERTHS PROVIDED: 1147 SPACES 631,179 S.F. =500 = 1262.3 OR 1263; 1263 + 300 EMPLOYEES = 1563 1563-10% REDUCTION FOR METROMOVER PROXIMITY 1563-156= 1407 REQUIRED SPACES 1407-1147= 260 SPACES PROVIDED OFFSITE (4)- 12' X 35' (1)-12'X55' (5)- 12' X 55' (6)- 16' X 60' C-3 PZ_1 PLANNING FACT SHEET APPLICANT Basketball Properties, Ltd. HEARING DATE December 17, 1997. REQUEST/LOCATION Consideration of a Major Use Special Permit for the property located at approximately 601 Biscayne Boulevard. LEGAL DESCRIPTION Complete legal description on file with the Hearing Boards Office. PETITION Consideration of a Major Use Special Permit for the American Airlines Arena Project at approximately 601 Biscayne Boulevard, to allow a 1,415,921 gross square feet multi -use structure consisting of: a multi -purpose arena component with a total of 24,000 seats, an office component, with 37,500 square feet, a commercial component, not to exceed 40,000 square feet, including clubs, restaurants and shops and a parking component, with a total of 1,147 parking spaces on site and 260 parking spaces offsite. PLANNING Approval with conditions. RECOMMENDATION BACKGROUND AND Please see attached analysis and recommendation. ANALYSIS PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD Approval CITY COMMISSION N/A APPLICATION NUMBER 97-055 VOTE: 5-0 Item #3 ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................... CITY OF MIAMI - DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT 444 SW 2ND AVENUE, 3RD FLOOR - MIAMI, FLORIDA, 33130 PHONE (305) 416-1435 ............................................................................................................................................................................... .. uate: uv15i9ts Page 1 =� 89 RESOLUTION PAB - 77-97 A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL, OF A MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT FOR THE AMERICAN AIRLINES ARENA PROJECT AT APPROXIMATELY 601 BISCAYNE BOULEVARD, TO ALLOW A 1,415,921 GROSS SQUARE FEET MULTI -USE STRUCTURE CONSISTING OF: A MULTI -PURPOSE ARENA COMPONENT WITH A TOTAL OF 24,000 SEATS, AN OFFICE COMPONENT, WITH 37,500 SQUARE FEET; A COMMERCIAL COMPONENT NOT TO EXCEED 40,000 SQUARE FEET, INCLUDING CLUBS, RESTAURANTS AND SHOPS AND A PARKING COMPONENT, WITH A TOTAL OF 1,147 PARKING SPACES ON SITE AND 260 PARKING SPACES OFFSITE. HEARING DATE: December 17, 1997 ITEM NO. 4 VOTE: 5-0 ATTEST: A o des Slazyk, AssAint Dar / Department of Planning and Development j`z-- 89 :3 ANALYSIS FOR MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT American Airlines Arena CASE NO: 97-055 Project Description: The proposed American Airlines Arena Project is a multi -purpose arena mixed use development to be located at approximately 601 Biscayne Boulevard within the Bayfront Park System in Downtown Miami (see attached legal description, location maps and aerial photographs for exact property boundaries). The proposed PROJECT will consist of 24,000 attraction seats, 37,500 square feet of office space, 40,000 square feet of accessory commercial space and 1,147 parking spaces. - The PROJECT will consist of a 1,415,921 gross square foot multi -use center which has been designed as a Waterfront Specialty Center. The Arena is to be a state-of- the-art, multi -use major public facility designed and constructed in conformity with current National Basketball Association ("NBA") standards and the current standards of the International Hockey League and the American Hockey League and shall include, without limitation, marshalling/loading areas, planned, designed and constructed to support the occupancy of professional basketball and professional hockey franchises and to host other events such as family shows, concerts, live theater, etc. The Arena component shall be a building containing a minimum of 680,000 square feet of space with at least three concourses, as well as mechanical and service levels and shall include appropriate amenities, such as clubs, restaurants and shops. In determining the appropriateness of the proposed Multi -purpose Arena, the Department of Development, Building and Zoning has referred this project to the Large Scale Development Committee (LSDC) and the Urban Development Review Board (UDRB) for additional input and recommendations; the following findings have been made: • It is found that the proposed Multi -purpose Arena project will benefit the Downtown District by creating a new state-of-the-art public facility for residents and visitors of the area. • It is found that the proposed project is consistent with the City of Miami's adopted Waterfront Masterplan which specifically called for the Downtown Waterfront Park system be utilized for Major Public Facilities which would allow greater numbers of people to enjoy the waterfront. 98- 89 5 It is found that the traffic study which was submitted as part of the application for development approval has concluded that there is sufficient capacity to accommodate the proposed project, however, said plan specifies that a traffic management plan for_ arena functions needs to be developed; said plan shall be required as a condition of the Major Use Special Permit prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the facility. It is found that the Urban Development Review Board (UDRB) has recommended approval of the proposed project with the condition that consideration be given to some concerns as specified on the attached minutes from its public meeting held on October 22, 1997. It is found that in response to the concerns of the UDRB, the Department of Planning and Development is recommending approval of the proposed project with the condition that the applicant work with City staff to mitigate the concerns of the UDRB as they pertain to the plaza area along Biscayne Boulevard, the perimeter areas of the project and linkage issues.. • It is found that the Large Scale Development Committee (LSDC) has reviewed the project for compliance with technical concerns and has recommended the following: 1. pursuant to the Department of Public Works, the project requires plans for proposed sidewalk and swale area improvements prior to the issuance of a building permit; 2. pursuant to the Downtown NET Office, the applicant shall submit a parking plan for construction employees and temporary parking arrangements for the existing building while the new building is under construction; said parking plan shall be subject to the review and approval by the Planning Department prior to the issuance of any building permits; and 3. pursuant to the Police and Fire Departments, the applicant shall continue to work closely with appropriate representatives from each of said Departments to ensure that all outstanding concerns regarding life safety issues are resolved prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. It is found that the Department of Development, Building and Zoning is in concurrence with the findings of the LSDC and will require compliance with the above referenced conditions prior to the issuance of any building permits or certificate of occupancy (as applicable) for the proposed project. It is found that with respect to all additional criteria as specified in Section 1305 of Zoning Ordinance 11000, the proposal has been reviewed and found to be adequate. ll� 2 � l� IS Based on these findings, the Department of Development, Building and Zoning is recommending approval of the requested Arena Development Project with the following conditions: 1. The approval of this Major Use Special Permit shall be subject to the recordation of the following documents prior to the issuance of any building permits for the proposed project: • Unity of Title or covenant in lieu thereof providing that the ownership, operation and maintenance of all common areas and facilities will be by the property owner. • Development Order specifying that the Development Order runs with the land and is binding on the Applicant, it successors and assigns, jointly or. severally. 2. Pursuant to the Department of Public Works, the project requires plans for proposed sidewalk and swale area improvements prior to the issuance of a building permit. 3. Pursuant to the Downtown NET Office, the applicant shall submit a parking plan for construction employees and temporary parking arrangements for the existing building while,the new building is under construction; said parking plan shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning Department prior to the issuance of any building permits. 4. Pursuant to concerns raised by the Police and Fire Departments, the applicant shall work closely with said departments to satisfactorily resolve all life safety issues involved prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 5. Pursuant to concerns raised by the UDRB, the applicant shall address the design issues specified in the attached minutes from the UDRB meeting of October 22, 1997. 6. With the exception of the signs specifically included in the application for development approval (Section S of the Application book on file with the Department of Development, Building and Zoning), all other sign proposals shall be subject to a separate review and approval by the Director of the Department of Development, Building and Zoning (note: said review and approval does not require a separate Class H Special Permit). 7. Pursuant to the comments received by the Zoning Division, the applicant shall submit a survey and site plan for of1site parking spaces showing location and design of the parking lot(s); said lots) shall meet distance requirements as specified in Zoning Ordinance 11000. 3 J89 r1 S. Pursuant to the comments received by the Zoning Division, all driving lanes to be located on parcel "B" shall have a minimum width of ten feet (10'-0") and must comply with FDOT turn radius standards. 9. The proposed project shall be subject to the review and approval (with conditions, if applicable) of the Miami -Dade County Shoreline Development Review Committee. 10. Pursuant to the traffic study which was submitted by the applicant as part of this approval, a complete "Traffic control management plan" shall be produced and submitted to the City of Miami for review and approval prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for this project; said plan shall address all issues related to traffic control measures which will be utilized by the applicant during major arena events. 11. Pursuant to concerns raised by the Downtown Development Authority regarding linkage issues to and from the proposed arena to the remainder of Downtown Miami (across Biscayne Boulevard), the applicant shall address the following issues throughout the permitting and construction period: a. Identification of approximately 4600 off -site parking spaces within a 10 minute walking radius of the project. b. Identification of approximately 2000 off -site parking spaces within a 5 to 10 minute shuttle bus connection to the project c. Identification of the principal transit station connections within a 10 minute walking radius to the project. d. Identification of on-sitelsite perimeter Metrobus, charter bus and shuttle bus loading locations and circulation patterns serving the project. e. Identification of downtown area primary pedestrian pathways interconnecting parking, transit and core area employeetresident concentrations with the project. f. Identification of primary routes for shuttle and bus connections between remote parking, transit and area employee/neighborhood centers. g. Identification of environmental design and enhancement measures that address improvements to pedestrian pathways including lighting, security, aesthetic enhancements, crosswalks (with particular emphasis on Biscayne Boulevard), pedestrian signalization and signage. h. Identification of financial and operational responsibility for shuttle bus operations linking the project to public transit and parking facilities. i. Design and operational impact issues of a pedestrian bridge connection from the arena project to Bayside and Bayfront Park. a y 89 j. Design and operational impact issues of surface road improvements to south side of Port Boulevard adjacent to Bayside project. k. Design and linkage issues of connecting a public baywalk along the bulkhead line of the FEC tract to existing and proposed baywalks to the public park lands to the south and north of the project. 1. Identification of "pathfinder" signage design and locations for pedestrian and vehicular traffic accessing the project through adjacent downtown areas including the Flagler Street core, Biscayne Boulevard, S.E. Overtown/Park West and Omni/Cultural Center districts. In addition to the conditions enumerated above, the applicant shall work cooperatively with the City of Miami and Miami -Dade County to comply with the following: 1. Compliance with all conditions and stipulations of the tri-party agreement; 2. Compliance with all conditions and stipulations set forth in the City of Miami/Miami-Dade County Purchase and Sale Agreement for the subject property; and 3. Compliance with all conditions and stipulations set forth in the covenants running with the property as executed and recorded. This approval shall also be subject to all additional conditions specified in the attached Development Order. 5 `- 89 NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC AND PARTICULARLY TO OWNERS OF REAL ESTATE WITHIN 375 FEET OF 601 Biscayne Boulevard A PUBLIC HEARING will be held by the City Commission on Tuesday, January 27, 1998, at 2:00 P.M., at City Hall, 3500 Pan American Drive, Dinner Key, to consider the following: Major Use Special Permit for the American Airlines Arena project to allow a 1,415,921 gross square feet multi -use structure consisting of: a multi -purpose arena component with a total of 24,000 seats, an office component, with 37,500 square feet; a commercial component not to exceed 40,000 square feet, including clubs, restaurants and shops and a parking component, with a total of 1,147 parking spaces on site and 260 parking spaces offsite. The PETITIONER or the PETITIONER'S LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE must be present at this Hearing. All interested real estate owners are invited to express their views. The request and supporting papers for this public hearing are on file at the City of Miami, Office of Hearing Boards, located at 444 S.W. 2nd Avenue, 71h Floor, Miami, Florida 33128. Phone number 416-2030. Should any person desire to appeal any decision of the City Commission based upon the recommendation or testimony considered at this meeting, that person shall insure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, including all testimony and evidence upon which any appeal may be based (F/S 286.0105). SECTION 2-653 OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, AS AMENDED, GENERALLY REQUIRES ANY PERSON WHO RECEIVES COMPENSATION, REMUNERATION OR EXPENSES FOR CONDUCTING LOBBYING ACTIVITIES TO REGISTER AS A LOBBYIST WITH THE CITY CLERK, PRIOR TO ENGAGING IN LOBBYING ACTIVATES BEFORE CITY STAFF, BOARDS, COMMITTEES AND THE CITY COMMISSION. A COPY OF SAID ORDINANCE IS AVAILABLE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK (MIAMI CITY HALL), LOCATED AT 3500 PAN AMERICAN DRIVE, MIAMI, FLORIDA, 33133. J8- 89 CITY OF MIAMI UKdAN DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Meeting of October 22, 1997 UDRB Report for. AMERICAN AIRLINES ARENA Review of Major Use Special Permit proposal for development of the New Basketball Arena. Item: 1 of 1 Location: Biscayne Blvd. between NE 81i Street and Port Boulevard. Applicant: Miami Heat / Arquitectonica. Case number. 97-114 Vote: Unanimous (6 to 0) UDRB Resolution: - Proposal recommended for approval as presented in plans and supplementary materials submitted by the applicant, subject to two conditions: That the plaza area on the west side of the project, fronting Biscayne Boulevard, be revised an enhanced in a manner to be reviewed by staff, so that it present a more welcoming and "open' feeling as viewed from the Boulevard. It was commented that this may be achieved through a reconfiguration of the steps provided and landscape areas. 2. That the perimeter areas of the project be designed with the same care and attention to detail as the rest of the project, particular as pertains to the linkage of the project to existing and future projects around it. In particular, the vehicular driveway along the northern portion of the site, should be designed and paved in a manner that allows the safe interaction of pedestrians and vehicles. Staff Recommendations: In addition to those concerns expressed by the Urban Development Review Board, as captioned above, staff recommends that the linkage strategy with the Bayside Center to the South, which presently consists of a diagrammatic bridge, be further developed so as to ensure the proper and mutually beneficial interaction of both developments in the future. CITY OF MIAMI • DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT, BUILDING AND ZONING 444 SW 2nd Avenue, 31 Floor - Miami, FI. 33130 J 8 - 89 11 Wl f - ......... y., N.E...1 ST �' ' f • e PAPPAS SUB I• / { Mt- A R • r3) Is ,yR 2•r. t rlt.]' 4 �� / III CAUSE, RAII N; o SMilk T 16 E r�! c , — , • • t ItOr•It0 NrrSON" • 2 .. �1 -j N i r.; r 2 +f r•'a T RAFTR A S •r NEW WORLD CENTER • f f s : SICENTENNIAL PARK W 111I (f_ .• /i w � II � V` E.a r• d r I• •a • •a N �a . .r • a r • � f S T. > o " ' � a • , ►• I) 2 • • f • ) • i f J "r•: ra r S• o Ia n n I, .} w S r u n a � V • r f cc NL .9 ST.It Is -- — - !9 G = I M tT .• .♦ •) .• r is N .: .1 r q r ..I N • i —_ - — — r� • 7 a .• r _ .: a / I a • q IS .1 .a,1r u s .W a• f• NI li a 1) ,. ., n I N r• ��.uM1» »�N 1 9.r: Iar l2 > Q I 1 LLNl Y:w Q• N a T. Io • • r • • • : a 1 • • , • • • a a 1 r • a ) a e N N N , III a n N Ia • Ir t• I• - 1-!Z la T-- to Jr /• f• M • • Y It is :�• IS It%—, T. I rr•t , r•'e' n ••. M N � t FEDE AL MIAMI DADS COMMUWry If I• Is 1• to I, COLLEGE W WORLD T. JUSTICE "' •' COLLEGE' SCNJARE • r • a . s : CENTER SU8��1 '=U8, N I rlta N I• rt a Ir f• . t• � —N.E. 3 t ST. +I• �; 1••• f a r e• • r• f• a t r • r • a r • ) r • 14 N 9! N 01 Ial1) .•' .• I• i1 ' r1 ra q r Ia 1• 1, y • N 1• tr N I• a• 1 •l as _ -- ;oo� voet All C-1 j5?l- 89 1 . C 2� 13 AS tow � Y. e Lyle t !r � _1 e 46 IMIK APPLICATION FOR A MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT File Number MU- - It is intended that major use special permits be required where specified uses and/or occupancies involve matters deemed to be of citywide or area -wide importance. The City Commission shall be solely responsible for determinations on applications for major use special permits. (See Article 17) The City Commission shall refer all applications for major use special permits to the Planning Advisory Board and to the Director of the Department of Planning, Building and Zoning for recommendations, and may make referrals to agencies, bodies, or officers, either through the Department of Planning, Building and Zoning or directly for review, analysis, and/or technical findings and determinations and reports thereon. (Section 1301.5.) I, Judith A. Burke, hereby apply to the Director of Planning, Building and Zoning of the City of Miami for approval of a Major Use Special Permit under the provisions of Article 17 of the City of Miami Zoning Ordinance. Address of Property: East of Biscayne Boulevard between Port Boulevard and N.E.Sth Street Nature of Proposed Use (Be specific): Multi -Use Major Public Facility This application also includes requests for the following Major Use Special Permits: (a) Nonresidential uses involving in excess of 200,000 square feet of floor area (Section 17.01 (2)). (b) Recreational, Cultural, or Entertainment Facilities involving in excess of 1,500 offstreet parking spaces (Section 17.01(6)) . (c) Any single use or combination of uses required or proposing to provide in excess of 500 offstreet parking spaces (Section 17.01(7)). (d) Any development which, by the terms of this zoning ordinance, is required to secure Major Use Special Permit approval (approval for 24,000 seats) (Section 17.01(10). Preliminary Application: I attach the following in support or explanation of the Preliminary Application: 1. Two copies of a survey of the property prepared by a State of Florida Registered Land Surveyor. 2. Affidavit disclosing ownership of property covered by application and disclosure of interest form (attach Forms 4-83 and 4a-83 to application). 3. Certified list of owners of real estate within a 375-foot radius from the outside boundaries of property covered by this application (attach Form 6-83 to application). 4. Maps of: (a) existing zoning, and (b) adopted comprehensive plan designations for areas on and around the property covered by this application. 5. General location map, showing relation to the site or activity to major streets, schools, existing utilities, shopping areas, important physical features in and adjoining the project, and the like. 6. Concept Plan (a) Site plan and relevant information. Section 1304.2.1 (d through h) (b) Relationships to surrounding existing and proposed future uses, and activities, systems and facilities (Section 1702.3.2a). (c) How concept affects existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan principles and designations; tabulation of any required variances, special permits, change of zoning or exemptions (Section 1702.3.2b). 7. Developmental Impact Study (an application for development approval for a Development of Regional Impact may substitute). 8. Other (8a specific): See attached supplemental documents 9. Fee of $45,000.00, based on Ordinance 10396. Additional fees for any required special permits, changes of zoning, or variances shall be in accord with zoning fees as listed in Section 62-61 of the City Code and Ordinance 10396. Fee tabulation: Building(s): Other (Specify): Total: $45,000.00 -2- ao ) 1�1 - 89 Final Application I attach the following additional information in support or explanation of the final application: Signature. Attorney for Applicant Judith A. Burke Name: Judith A. Burke Address: 201 S. Biscayne Blvd./Suite 1600 City, State, Zip: Miami, Florida 33131 Phone: 305-379-9187 This application is [ ] approved [ ] denied in accord with City Commission Resolution Number: Other: Jack Luft, Director Planning, Building and Zoning Department Date: M Ass 176969.1 - ucC -3- j, so ZI AMERICAN AIRLINES ARENA II Class I and Class II Special Permits III Special Exceptions I This application encompasses the following four (4) separate requests for a Major Use Special Permit: l . Nonresidential uses involving in excess of 200,000 square feet of floor area (Section 17.01(2)). 2. Recreational, Cultural, or Entertainment Facilities involving in excess of 1,500 offstreet parking spaces (Section 17.01(6)) . 3. Any single use or combination of uses required or proposing to provide in excess of 500 offstreet parking spaces (Section 17.01(7)). 4. Any development which, by the terms of this zoning ordinance, is required to secure Major Use Special Permit approval (approval for 24,000 seats) (Section 17.01(10). This Major Use Special Permit Application incorporates requests for Class I and Class II Special Permits. The following is a list of the Class I and Class II permits required for this Project: 1. Class I Permit to allow valet parking at the Project (Section 917.12) 2. Class II Permit to approve development between Biscayne Boulevard and Biscayne Bay. 3. Class II Permit to waive the requirements of the Dade County Landscape Ordinance. AMERICAN AIRLINES ARENA DISCLOSURE OF OWNERSHIP The Applicant is Basketball Properties. Ltd., a Florida limited partnership. A. The general partner of the Applicant, with a one (1 %) percent partnership interest, is Basketball Propgrties. Inc., a Florida corporation. 1. One hundred (100%) percent of the stock of Basketball Properties, Inc. is held by JMD Delaware Inc., as Trustee of the Micky Arison Holdings Trust, a Delaware trust for which Micky Arison is the sole beneficiary. B. 'The sole limited partner of the Applicant, with a ninety-nine (999/o) percent partnership interest, is Miami Heat Limited Partnership, a Florida limited partnership. 1. The general partner of Miami Heat Limited Partnership, with a fifty (501/6) percent partnership interest, is Florida Basketball Associates. Inc., a Florida corporation. FBA II. Inc., a Delaware corporation, has the right to receive all distributions and proceeds in respect of ninety-nine (99%) percent of the fifty (50%) percent partnership interest held by Florida Basketball Associates, Inc. (a) One hundred (100%) percent of the stock of 'each of Florida Basketball Associates. lnc. and FBA Ii Inc, is held by JMD Delaware, Inc., as Trustee of the Micky Arison Holdings Trust, a Delaware trust for which Micky Arison is the sole beneficiary. 2. The limited partners of Miami Heat Limited Partnership are Raanan Katz (with a 6% partnership interest); Amancio Suarez (with a 5% partnership interest); Julio Iglesias (with a 1 % partnership interest); Robert Sturgess (with a 1 % partnership interest) and the Marilyn B. Arison Irrevocable Trust, a Delaware trust for which Marilyn B. Arison is the sole beneficiary (with a 37% partnership interest). MIA95 178788.1 - AMO STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF DADE AFFIDAVIT } } SS } Before me, the undersigned authority, this day personally appeared Judith A. Burke, who being by me first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and says: That she is the legal representative of the Applicant, submitting the accompanying application for a public hearing as required by Ordinance 11000 of the Code of the City of Miami, Florida; affecting the real property located in the City of Miami, as described and listed on the pages attached to this affidavit and made a part thereof. 2. That said Applicant which she represents has given its full and complete permission for her to act in their behalf for the change or modification of a classification or regulation of zoning as set out in the accompanying petition. 3. That the pages attached hereto and made a part of this affidavit contain the current names, mailing addresses, phone numbers and legal descriptions for the real property of which she is the legal representative. 4. The facts as represented in the application and documents submitted in conjunction with this affidavit are true and correct. Further Affiant sayeth not. Sworn to and Subscribed before me this ,S day of_*A-)t 6-A— 1997 otary Public, State of Florida at Large My Commission Expires: nos 1MG4.1- ucc (SEAL) Judith A. Burke Attorney for Applicant )8- 89 n� v� DISCLOSURE OF OWNERSHIP Legal description and street address of subject real property: See attached Exhibit "A." Property is located east of Biscayne Boulevard between Port Boulevard and N.E. 8th Street, Miami, Florida. 2. Owner(s) of subject real property and percentage of ownership. Note: City of Miami Ordinance No. 9419 requires disclosure of all parties having a financial interest, either direct or indirect, in the subject matter of a presentation, request or petition to the City Commission. Accordingly, question 12 requires disclosure of shareholders of corporations, beneficiaries of trusts, and/or any other interested parties, together with their addresses and proportionate interest. The Owner of the Property is the City of Miami, Florida, a municipal corporation of the State of Florida (the "City"). Metropolitan Dade County, Florida, a political subdivision of the State of Florida ("Dade County") is the contract purchaser of the Property pursuant to that certain Interlocal and Cooperation Agreement of Sale and Purchase (the "Purchase Agreement) dated on or about November 18, 1997 between the City and Dade County. This application is filed by Basketball Properties, Ltd., a Florida limited partnership (the "Applicant"), as so designated by Dade County. The Disclosure of Ownership for Basketball Properties, Ltd. is attached hereto as Exhibit "B." 3. Legal description and street address of any real property (a) owned by any party listed in answer to question #2, and (b) located within 375 feet of the subject real property. None as to the Applicant. 4: 1 Attorney for Applicant Judith A. Burke STATE OF FLORIDA } ) SS: COUNTY OF DADE } Judith A. Burke, being duly sworn, deposes and says that she is the (Attorney for Applicant) of the real property described in answer to question #l, above that she has read the foregoing answers and that the same are true and complete; and (if acting as attorney, for owner) that she has authority to execute the Disclosure of Ownership form on behalf of the Applicant.. (SEAL) NAK Public, State of Florida at Large SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED before me this 5 day of 22 4[ , , 1997 WA95 1 m5Z.1 - LXC (AL NCTARY SEAL LIN—.A CHIISTIAN NfrA.^Y :'::73*.:�.. ; c F FLORIDA CL::d0. CC324637 M., COMMISRON FRCP !-E3. 2111999 89 0? E xAiBIT itA%% THE PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION A tract of land in section 37, Townships 53 and 54 South, Range 42 East, in Section 31, Township 53 South, Range 42 East and Section 6, Township 54 South, Range 42 East, said tract of land lying, situate and being in the City of Miami, Dade County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows: COMMENCE at the point of intersection of the Easterly extension of the Centerline of 3`d Street (now known as N.E. 9'h Street) as shown on the plat of A. L. KNOWLTON S MAP OF NIIAMI, according to the plat thereof recorded in plat Book " B " at page 41 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, with the Easterly right of way boundary of BISCAYNE BOULEVARD, said Easterly right of way boundary of BISCAYNE BOULEVARD being parallel with and 53 feet Easterly of as measured at right angles to, the Easterly right of way boundary of BISCAYNE DRIVE as shown on said A.L. KNOWLTON'S MAP OF MIANH; thence run South 00° 04' 29" West along said Easterly right of way boundary of. Biscayne Boulevard a distance of 318.83 feet to the point of intersection with a line lying 6.25 feet North of and parallel with the Easterlyy prolongation of the North right of way Boundary of 4`h Street (now known as N.E. 8 Street) as shown on said plat of AL. KNOWLTONS MAP OF MIAMI, said point of intersection also being the POINT OF BEGINNING of the parcel of land hereinafter described; thence run South 89* 57 43" East along said line lying 6.25 feet North of and parallel with the Easterly prolongation of the North right of way boundary of 4h Street( now known as N.E. 8f' Street), a distance of 1038.30 feet to a point lying 315.29 feet Westerly of , as measured at right angles to, the BULKHEAD LINE as shown on REVISED PLAT OF SHEET 3 - METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA BULKHEAD LINE - PART TBREE, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 74 at page 18 of the Public Records of Dade County Florida; thence run, perpendicular to the last described course, South 00° 02' 17" West for a distance of 618.94 feet to a point, said point lying 135.91 feet North of as measured at right angles to, the Easterly extension of the Southerly right of way boundary of a Street (now known as N.E. 6* Street) as shown on said plat of A.L. KNOWLTON'S MAP OF MIAN 1; thence run South 85° 40' 53" West a distance of 220.60 feet to a point of deflection; thence run South 871 28' 45" West a distance of 190.87 feet to a point of deflection; thence run South 85° 04' 25" West a distance of 208.28 feet to a point of deflection, said point of deflection also to be known as POINT " A " for purposes of this description; thence run South 8 1 " 57' 30" West a distance of 208.28 feet to the point of curvature of a circular verve to the right; thence run Westerly and Northwesterly along the arc of said circular curve to the right, having a radius of 55.00 feet, through a central angle of 760 21' 01 ", for an arc distance of 73.29 feet; thence run North 21° 41' 29" West, tangent to the last described curve, a distance of 294.95 feet to a point of deflection; j�z 89 51 thence run North 1u 20' 23" West a distance of 139.23 feet ro the point of intersection with the Easterly right of way boundary of BISCAYNE BOULEVARD, said Easterly right of way boundary of BISCAYNE BOULEVARD being parallel with and 53 feet Easterly o� as measured at right angles to, the Easterly right of way boundary of said BISCAYNE DRIVE, said last eight (8) described courses being along the Northerly right of way boundary of PORT BOULEVARD as described in Official Records Book 13849 at page 1026 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida; thence run North 01 ° 57' 43" West, along said Easterly right of way boundary of BISCAYNE BOULEVARD, a distance of 191.96 feet to a point of deflection; thence run North 00° 04' 29" East, along said Easterly right of way boundary of BISCAYNE BOULEVARD, a distance of 58.01 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING, together with all riparian rights appertaining thereto and together with all existing seawalls, bulkheads, docks, fill and upland improvements extending from the aforesaid property Easterly into Biscayne Bay; LESS AND EXCEPTING THEREFROM the following described 30 foot wide tract of Land lying 15.00 feet on each side of the centerline of the Florida East Coast Railway Company's Spur Tract No. 181 serving Dodge Island Seaport, but including all air rights to said Tract beginning 23 feet above the top of the rails, and being more particularly described as follows: COMMENCE at the aforesaid described point "A"; thence run South 810 57 30" West, along the Northerly right of way boundary of said PORT BOULEVARD, for a distance of 1.95 feet to the point of intersection with a line that is parallel with and 15.00 feet Northeasterly of as measured at right angles to, the centerline of said Railway's Spur Tract No. 181, and' the POINT OF BEGINNING of the parcel of land hereinafter described; thence run North 700 58' 03" West, along the line that is parallel with and 15.00 feet Northeasterly of as measured at right angles to, the centerline of said Railway's Spur Tract No. 181, a distance of 298.58 feet to the point of curvature of a circular curve to the left; thence Westerly along the arc of said circular curve to the left, having a radius of 506.31 feet, through a central angle of 021 23' 03.5", for an arc distance of 21.07 feet to the point of intersection with the Northeasterly right of way boundary of said PORT BOULEVARD, said point of intersection bearing North 160 38' 53.5" East from the center of said curve; thence run South 21 ° 41' 29" East, along said Northeasterly right of way boundary of PORT BOULEVARD, a distance of 39.01 feet to the point of intersection with a line that is 15.00 feet Southwesterly of as measured at right angles to, the centerline of said Railways Spur Tract No. 181; thence run South 70° 58' 03" East, along the last described line, a distance of 235.49 feet to the point of intersection with the Northerly right of way boundary of said PORT BOULEVARD; thence run North 81° 5T 30" East, along the Northerly right of way boundary of said PORT BOULEVARD, a distance of 65.91 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing 14.63 acres, more or less. 2 )c 89 EX"j0iT 110" ARTICLE 1 F. DIRECTORY OF PROJECT PRINCIPALS fili�IZiI. ►t�c7 City of Miami 444 S.W. 2nd Avenue Miami, Florida 33130 CONTRACT PURCHASER Metropolitan Dade County Stephen B. Clark Center 111 N.W. First Street Miami, Florida 33128 APPLICANUDEVELOPMENT MANAGER Basketball Properties, Ltd One S.E. Third Avenue, Suite 2300 Miami, Florida 33131 LAND USE ATTORNEY Shuns & Bowen LLP 1500 Miami Center 201 South Biscayne Boulevard Miami, Florida 33131 ARCHITECTS Arquitectonica International Ina 550 Brickell Avenue, Suite 200 Miami, Florida 33131 Heinlein & Schrock Architecture 4118 Pennsylvania, Suite 1 Kansas City, Missouri 64111 Spillis Candela & Partners 800 Douglas Entrance Coral Gables, Florida 33134 STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS Thornton-Tomasetti Engineers 641 Avenue of the Americas New York, New York 10011 Donnel Duquesne & Alba&a 4930 S.W. 74th Court Miami, Florida 33155 MEP ENGINEERS Flack & K, , Consulting Engineers 475 5th Avenue New York, New York 10017 Fraga Engineering 3830 Shipping Avenue Miami, Florida 33146 IMDC 4141 N.E. 2nd Avenue, Suite 101 Miami, Florida 33137 CIVIL ENGINEERS Pawa Complex International 12938 S.W. 133rd Court Miami, Florida 33186 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT Curtis & Rogers Design Studio 2982 Grand Avenue, Suite 301 Miami, Florida 33133 GEOTECHMCAL CONSULTANTS Langan Engineering 20803 Biscayne Boulevard, #110 Miami, Florida 33180 CODE CONSULTANTS Code Consultants Incorporated 760 Office Parkway St. Louis, MO 63141 SHORELINE CONSULTANTS Coastal Systems International 464 South Dixie Highway Coral Gables, Florida 33146 ACCESSIBII.ITY CONSULTANTS Arcodect 401 East Court Street Cincinnati, Ohio 45202-1355 01 TRAFFIC CONSULTANTS David Ruh. er & Associates, Inc. 1750 Ponce De Leon Boulevard Coral Gables, Florida 33134 PARKING DESIGN CONSULTANT Urbitran/Ramp Associates 330 Old Country Road, Suite 307 Mineola, New York 11501 ACOUSTIC / AV CONSULTANT Wrightson, Johnson, Haddon & William 13714 Gamma Road, Suite 110 Dallas, Texas 75244 VERTICAL TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANT Jerry Henry & Associates 320 A Street, S.E. Washington, D.C. 20003 FOOD SERVICE CONSULTANT The Boelter Companies 11100 W. Silver Spring Road Milwaukee, WI 53225 3 ZONING FACT SHEET Case Number: 1997-0075 15-Dec-97 Item No: 8 Location: Approximately 601 Biscayne Boulevard Legal: (Complete legal description on file with the Office of Hearing Boards) Applicant: American Airlines Arena 201 S. Biscayne Blvd., #1600 Miami, FL 33131 App. Ph: (305) 379-9187 Zoning: PR -Parks and Recreation Judith A. Burke 201 S. Biscayne Blvd., #1600 Miami, FL 33131 Rep. Ph: (305) 379-9187 ext Rep. Fa (__j _ ext Request: Special Exception as part of a Major Use Special Permit for the American Airlines Arena, requiring City Commission approval as listed in Ordinance No. 11000, as amended, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Article 4, Section 401, Schedule of District Regulations, PR Parks and Recreation, Conditional Principle Uses, for restaurant/rental uses and a Special Exception per Article 9, Section 918 to permit up to twenty-five (25%) percent of required parking to be located offsite. The applicant proposes to utilize an offsite parking area to satisfy seventeen (17%) percent of the required parking. Recommendations: Planning and Development: Approval with conditions Public Works: Platting of the land is required. Plat and Street Committee: Platting of the land is required. Dade County Transportation: No comments. Enforcement History, If any C.E.B. Case No: N/A Last Hearing Date: Found: N/A Violation(s) Cited: N/A Ticketing Action: N/A Daily Fine: $0.00 Affidavit Non -Compliance Issued on: Warning Letter sent on: Total Fines to Date: $0.00 Lien Recorded on: Comply Order by: CEB Action: History: )V_ 89 '39 Ms. Ileana Hernandez offered the following Resolution and moved its adoption. RESOLUTION ZB 135-97 AFTER CONSIDERING THE FACTORS SET FORTH IN SECTION 1305 OF ORDINANCE NO. 11000, AS AMENDED, THE ZONING BOARD RECOMMENDED APPROVAL TO THE CITY COMMISSION FOR THE SPECIAL EXCEPTION AS PART OF A MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT FOR THE AMERICAN AIRLINES ARENA, REQUIRING CITY COMMISSION APPROVAL AS LISTED IN ORDINANCE NO. 11000, AS AMENDED, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, ARTICLE 4, SECTION 401, SCHEDULE OF DISTRICT REGULATIONS, PR PARKS AND RECREATION, CONDITIONAL PRINCIPAL USES, FOR RESTAURANT/RENTAL USES AND A SPECIAL EXCEPTION PER ARTICLE 9, SECTION 918 TO PERMIT UP TO TWENTY-FIVE (25%) PERCENT OF REQUIRED PARKING TO BE LOCATED OFFSITE. THE APPLICANT PROPOSES TO UTILIZE AN OFFSITE PARKING AREA TO SATISFY SEVENTEEN (17%) PERCENT OF THE REQUIRED PARKING FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY 601 BISCAYNE BOULEVARD LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS EXHIBIT "A"; ZONED PR PARKS AND RECREATION. THESE SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS WERE RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL TO THE CITY COMMISSION WITH A TIME LIMITATION OF TWO (2) YEARS IN WHICH A BUILDING PERMIT MUST BE OBTAINED AND THEY ARE SUBJECT TO THE ATTACHED CONDITIONS IN EXHIBIT `B". Upon being seconded by Mr. Osvaldo Moran-Ribeaux the motion was passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: Mses. Basila, Cuervo, Hernandez & Morales Messrs. Barket, Crespo, Gibbs, Obregon & Moran-Ribeaux NAYES: None ABSENT: None Ms. Fernandez: Motion carries 9-0 t Teresita L. Fernandez, Chief Office of Hearing Boards December 15, 1997 - Item #8 Zoning Board 89 3� EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION THE PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION A tract of land in section 37, Townships 53 and 54 South, Range 42 East, in Section 31, Township 53 South, Range 42 East and Section 6, Township 54 South, Range 42 East, said tract of land lying, situate and being in the City of Miami, Dade County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows: CONM NCE at the point of intersection of the Easterly extension of the Centerline of P Street (now known as N.E. Oh Street) as shown on the plat of A L. KNOWLTON S MAP OF NUAW according to the plat thereof recorded in plat Book " B " at page 41 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, with the Easterly right of way boundary of BISCAYNE BOULEVARD, said Easterly right of way boundary of BISCAYNE BOULEVARD being parallel with and 53 feet Easterly og as measured at right angles to, the Easterly right of way boundary of BISCAYNE DRIVE as shown on said A.L. KNOWLTONS MAP OF MIAMI; thence run South 00° 04' 29" West along said Easterly right of way boundary of Biscayne Boulevard a distance of 318.83 feet to the point of intersection with a line lying 6.25 feet North of and parallel with the Easterly prolongation of the North right of way Boundary of 4t° Street (now known as N.E. Street) as shown on said pint of A.L. KNOWLTONS MAP OF MIAK said point of intersection also being the POINT OF BEGINNING of the parcel of land hereinafter described; thence run South 89° ST 43" East along said line lying 6.25 feet North of and parallel with the Easterly prolongation of the North right of way boundary of 0 Street( now known as N.E. 8d' Street), a distance of 1038.30 feet to a point lying 315.29 feet Westerly of , as measured at right angles to, the BULICHEAD LINE as shown on REVISED PLAT OF SHEET 3 - METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA BULICHEAD LINE - PART TERSE, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 74 at page 18 of the Public Records of Dade County Florida; thence run, perpendicular to the last described course, South 00° 02' 17" West for a distance of 618.94 feet to a point, said point lying 135.91 feet North o& as measured at right angles to, the Easterly extension of the Southerly right of way boundary of a Street (now known as N.E. 6d' Street) as shown on said plat of A.L. KNOWLTONS MAP OF MIAW thence run South 85° 40' 53" West a distance of 220.60 feet to a point of deflection; thence run South 870 28' 45" West a distance of 190.87 feet to a point of deflection; thence run South 85° 04' 25" West a distance of 208.28 feet to a point of deflection, said point of deflection also to be known as POINT " A " for purposes of this description; thence run South 81° 57' 30" West a distance of 208.28 feet to the point of curvature of a circular curve to the right; thence run Westerly and Northwesterly along the arc of said circular curve to the right, having a radius of 55.00 feet, through a central angle of 760 2 F 010, for an arc distance of 73.29 feet; thence run North 21° 41' 29" West, tangent to the last described curve, a distance of 294.95 feet to a point of deflection; EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION thence run North 16° 20' 23" West a distance of 139.23 feet to the point of intersection with the Easterly right of way boundary of BISCAYNE BOULEVARD, said Easterly right of way boundary of BISCAYNE BOULEVARD being parallel with and 53 feet Easterly of as measured at right angles to, the Easterly right of way boundary of said BISCAYNE DRIVE, said last eight (8) described courses being along the Northerly right of way boundary of PORT BOULEVARD as described in Official Records Book 13849 at page 1026 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida; thence run North 0110 57 43" West, along said Easterly right of way boundary of BISCAYNE BOULEVARD, a distance of 191.96 feet to a point of deflection; thence run North 00° 04' 29" East, along said Easterly right of way boundary of BISCAYNE BOULEVARD, a distance of 58.01 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; together with all riparian rights appertaining thereto and together with all existing seawalls, bulkheads, docks, fill and upland improvements extending from the aforesaid property Easterly into Biscayne Bay; LESS AND EXCEPTING TEIEREFROM the following dewnbed 30 foot wide tract of Land lying 15.00 feet on each side of the centerline of the Florida East Coast Railway Company's Spur Tract No. 181 serving Dodge Island Seaport, but including all air rights to said Tract beginning 23 feet above the top of the rafts, and being more particularly described as follows: COMMENCE at the aforesaid described point "A"; thence run South 81* ST 301 West, along the Northerly right of way boundary of said PORT BOULEVARD, for a distance of 1.95 feet to the point of intersection with a line that is parallel with and 15.00 feet Northeasterly of; as measured at right angles. to, the centerline of said Railways Spur Tract No. 181, and the POINT OF BEGINNING of the parcel of land hereinafter described, thence run North 700 58' 03" West, along the line that is parallel with and 15.00 feet Northeasterly of, as measured at right angles to, the centerline of said Railways Spur Tract No. 181, a distance of 298.58 feet to the point of curvature of a circular curve to the lef% thence Westerly along the arc of said circular curve to the left, having a radius of 506.31 feet, through a central angle of 02' 23' 03.5", for an we distance of 21:07 feet to the point of intersection with the Northeasterly right of way boundary of said PORT BOULEVARD, said point of intersection bearing North 16° 3V 53.5" East from the center of said curve; thence run South 21° 41' 29" East, along said Northeasterly right of way boundary of PORT BOULEVARD, a distance of 39.01 feet to the point of intersection with a line that is 15.00 feet Southwesterly of; as treasured at right angles to, the centerline of said Railway's Spur Tract No. 181; thence run South 70' 58' 03" East, along the last described line, a distance of 235.49 feet to the point of intersection with the Northerly right of way boundary of said PORT BOULEVARD; thence run North 81° 57 30" East, along the Northerly right of way boundary of said PORT BOULEVARD, a distance of 65.91 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING Containing 14.63 acres, more or less. EXN1131T ')13" 1. The approval of this Major Use Special Permit shall be subject to the recordation of the following documents prior to the issuance of any building permits for the proposed project: • Unity of Title or covenant in lieu thereof providing that the ownership, operation and maintenance of all common areas and facilities will be by the property owner. • Development Order specifying that the Development Order runs with the land and is binding on the Applicant, it successors and assigns, jointly or severally. 2. Pursuant to the Department of Public Works, the project requires plans for proposed sidewalk and swale area improvements prior to the issuance of a building permit. 2. pursuant to the Downtown NET Office, the applicant shall submit a parking plan for construction employees and temporary parking arrangements for the existing building while the new building is under construction; said parking plan shall be subject to the review and approval by the Planning Department prior to the issuance of any building permits; and 3. pursuant to the Police and Fire Departments, the applicant shall continue to work closely with appropriate representatives from each of said Departments to ensure that all outstanding concerns regarding life safety issues are resolved prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. • It is found that the Department of Development, Building and Zoning is in concurrence with the findings of the LSDC and will- require compliance with the above referenced conditions prior to the issuance of any building permits or certificate of occupancy (as applicable) for the proposed project. • It is found that with respect to all additional criteria as specified in Section 1305 of Zoning Ordinance 11000, the proposal has been reviewed and found to be adequate. Based on these findings, the Department of Development, Building and Zoning is recommending approval of the requested Arena Development Project with the following conditions: 1. The approval of this Major Use Special Permit shall be subject to the recordation of the following documents prior to the issuance of any building permits for the proposed project: • Unity of Title or covenant in lieu thereof providing that the ownership, operation and maintenance of all common areas and facilities will be by the property owner. • Development Order specifying that the Development Order runs with the land and is binding on the Applicant, it successors and assigns, jointly or severally. 2. Pursuant to the Department of Public Works, the project requires plans for proposed sidewalk and swale area improvements prior to the issuance of a building permit. Ej 89 3. Pursuant to the Downtown NET Office, the applicant shall submit a parking plan for construction employees and temporary parking arrangements for the existing building while the new building is under construction; said parking plan shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning Department prior to the issuance of any building permits. 4. Pursuant to concerns raised by the Police and Fire Departments, the applicant shall work closely with said departments to satisfactorily resolve all life safety issues involved prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 5. Pursuant to concerns raised by the UDRB, the applicant shall address the design issues specified in the attached minutes from the UDRB meeting of October 22, 1997. 6. With the exception of the signs specifically included in the application for development approval (Section 8 of the Application book on file with the Department of Development, Building and Zoning), all other sign proposals shall be subject to a separate review and approval by the Director of the Department of Development, Building and Zoning (note: said review and approval does not require a separate Class II Special Permit). 7. Pursuant to the comments received by the Zoning Division, the applicant shall submit a survey and site plan for offsite parking spaces showing location and design of the parking lot(s); said lot(s) shall meet distance requirements as specified in Zoning Ordinance 11000. 8. Pursuant to the comments received by the Zoning Division, all driving lanes to be located on parcel "B" shall have a minimum width of ten feet (10'-0") and must comply with FDOT turn radius standards. 9. The proposed project shall be subject to the review and approval (with conditions, if applicable) of the Miami -Dade County Shoreline Development Review Committee. 10. Pursuant to the traffic study which was submitted by the applicant as part of this approval, a complete "Traffic control management plan" shall be produced and submitted to the City of Miami for review and approval prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for this project; said plan shall address all issues related to traffic control measures which will be utilized by the applicant during major arena events. 11. Pursuant to concerns raised by the Downtown Development Authority regarding linkage issues to and from the proposed arena to the remainder of Downtown Miami (across Biscayne Boulevard), the applicant shall address the following issues throughout the permitting and construction period: )8- 89 #5 a. Identification of approximately 4600 off -site parking spaces within a 10 minute walking radius of the project. b. Identification of approximately 2000 off -site parking spaces within a 5 to 10 minute shuttle bus connection to the project c. Identification of the principal transit station connections within a 10 minute walking radius to the project. d. Identification of on-site/site perimeter Metrobus, charter bus and shuttle bus loading locations and circulation patterns serving the project. e. Identification of downtown area primary pedestrian pathways interconnecting parking, transit and core area employee/resident concentrations with the project. f. Identification of primary routes for shuttle and bus connections between remote parking, transit and area employee/neighborhood centers. g. Identification of environmental design and enhancement measures that address improvements to pedestrian pathways including lighting, security, aesthetic enhancements, crosswalks (with particular emphasis on Biscayne Boulevard), pedestrian signalization and signage. h. Identification of financial and operational responsibility for shuttle bus operations linking the project to public transit and parking facilities. i. Design and operational impact issues of a pedestrian bridge connection from the arena project to Bayside and Bayfront Park. j. Design and operational impact issues of surface road improvements to south side of Port Boulevard adjacent to Bayside project. k. Design and linkage issues of connecting a public baywalk along the bulkhead line of the FEC tract to existing and proposed baywalks to the public park lands to the south and north of the project. 1. Identification of "pathfinder" signage design and locations for pedestrian and vehicular traffic accessing the project through adjacent downtown areas including the Flagler Street core, Biscayne Boulevard, S.E. Overtown/Park West and Omni/Cultural Center districts. In addition to the conditions enumerated above, the applicant shall work cooperatively with the City of Miami and Miami -Dade County to comply with the following: 1. Compliance with all conditions and stipulations of the tri-party agreement; 2. Compliance with all conditions and stipulations set forth in the City of Miami/Miami-Dade County Purchase and Sale Agreement for the subject property; and 3. Compliance with all conditions and stipulations set forth in the covenants running with the property as executed and recorded. This approval shall also be subject to all additional conditions specified in the attached Development Order. 89 ZONING BOARD ACTION ON PETITION FOR VARIANCE 'ION: I move that the req, on agenda item_ be (denied) (granted) that the requirements of Section 1903.1 (were) (were not) satisfied• by relevant evidence in the record of the public hearing. a) as stated in the City's finds of fact, or b) as demonstrated by the petitioner, or - c) on the basis of the following: The Zoning Board shall make findings that all of the requirements and standards of Section 1903.1 (have been) (have not been) demonstrtated. CHECK ONE a) Special conditions and circumstances (exist) (do OF EACH not exist) which are peculiar to the land, STATEMENT structure or building involved and which are not applicable to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same zoning district. 1) as stated in the City's findings of fact 2) as demonstrated by the petitioner 3) as otherwise stated below: b) The special conditions and circumstances (do) (do not) result from the actions of the petitioner: _ 1) as stated in the City's findings of fact _ 2) as demonstrated by the petitioner _ 3) as otherwise stated below: c) Literal interpretation of the provisions of the zoning ordinance (would) (would not) deprive the. applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other' properties in the same zoning district under the terms of the zoning ordinance and. work unnecessary and undue hardships on the' petitioner: 1) as stated ih the City's findings of fact 2) as demonstrated by the petitioner _ 3) as otherwise stated below: . .r)s— 89 qq a d) Granting the variance requested (rill) (will not) convey the same treatment to the individual owner as to the o- r of other lands, buildings, or structures in same zoning district. 1) as stated in the City's findings of fact 2) as demonstrated by the petitioner 3) as otherwise stated below e) Granting the variance requested (will) (will not) convey the same treatment, any special privilege that is denied by the zoning ordinance to other lands, buildings or structures in the same zoning district. f) if granted the variance (will be) (will not be) ,In harmony with the general intent and purpose of the zoning ordinance, and will not be injurious to the neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare: _ 1) as stated in the City's findings of fact „ 2) -as demonstrated by the petitioner 3) as otherwise stated below: Signatuxw Date Item n 01 ANALYSIS FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTION as a component of a MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT for the AMERICAN AIRLINES ARENA 601 BISCAYNE BOULEVARD CASE NO. 19 97-0075 Pursuant to Ordinance 11000, as amended, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, the subject proposal has been reviewed to allow a Major Use Special Permit for a Multi -purpose Arena with the following Special Exceptions: • Special Exception with City Commission approval, per Article 4, Section 401 to allow -restaurant/retail uses in the PR Zoning District; • Special Exception per Article 9, Section 918 to allow up to twenty five percent (25%) of required parking to be located offsite; applicant proposes to locate seventeen percent (17%) offsite). Project Description: The proposed American Airlines Arena Project is a multi -purpose arena mixed use development to be located at approximately 601 Biscayne Boulevard within the Bayfront Park System in Downtown Miami. The proposed PROJECT will consist of 24,000 attraction seats, 37,500 square feet of office space, 40,000 square feet of accessory commercial space and 1,147 parking spaces. The PROJECT will consist of a 1,415,921 gross square foot multi -use center which has been designed as a Waterfront Specialty Center. The Arena is to be a state-of- the-art, multi -use major public facility designed and constructed in conformity with current National Basketball Association ("NBA") standards and the current standards of the International Hockey League and the American Hockey League and shall include, without limitation, marshalling/loading areas, planned, designed and constructed to support the occupancy of professional basketball and professional hockey franchises and to host other events such as family shows, concerts, live theater, etc. 89 5I 8 The Arena component shall be a building containing a minimum of 680,000 square feet of space with at least three concourses, as well as mechanical and service levels and shall include appropriate amenities, such as clubs, restaurants and shops. In determining the appropriateness of the proposed Multi -purpose Arena, the Department of Development, Building and Zoning has referred this project to the Large Scale Development Committee (LSDC) and the Urban Development Review Board (UDRB) for additional input and recommendations; the following findings have been made: • It is found that the proposed Multi -purpose Arena project will benefit the Downtown District by creating a new state-of-the-art public facility for residents and visitors of the area. • It is found that the proposed project is consistent with the City of Miami's adopted Waterfront Masterplan which specifically called for the Downtown Waterfront Park system be utilized for Major Public Facilities which would allow greater numbers of people to enjoy the waterfront. • It is found that the traffic study which was submitted as part of the application for development approval has concluded that there is sufficient capacity to accommodate the proposed project, however, said plan specifies that a traffic management plan for arena functions needs to be developed; said plan shall be required as a condition of the Major Use Special Permit prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the facility. • It is found that the Urban Development Review Board (UDRB) has recommended approval of the proposed project with the condition that consideration be given to some concerns as specified on the attached minutes from its public meeting held on October 22, 1997. • It is found that in response to the concerns of the UDRB, the Department of Planning and Development is recommending approval of the proposed project with the condition that the applicant work with City staff to mitigate the concerns of the UDRB as they pertain to the plaza area along Biscayne Boulevard, the perimeter areas of the project and linkage issues.. • It is found that the Large Scale Development Committee (LSDC) has reviewed the project for compliance with technical concerns and has recommended the following: 1. pursuant to the Department of Public Works, the project requires plans for proposed sidewalk and swale area improvements prior to the issuance of a building permit; f?- 89 52 2. pursuant to the Downtown NET Office, the applicant shall submit a parking plan for construction employees and temporary parking arrangements for the existing building while the new building is under construction; said parking plan shall be subject to the review and approval by the Planning Department prior to the issuance of any building permits; and 3. pursuant to the Police and Fire Departments, the applicant shall continue to work closely with appropriate representatives from each of said Departments to ensure that all outstanding concerns regarding life safety issues are resolved prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. • It is found that the Department of Development, Building and Zoning is in concurrence with the findings of the LSDC and will- require compliance with the above referenced conditions prior to the issuance of any building permits or certificate of occupancy (as applicable) for the proposed project. • It is found that with respect to all additional criteria as specified in Section 1305 of Zoning Ordinance 11000, the proposal has been reviewed and found to be adequate. Based on these findings, the Department of Development, Building and Zoning is recommending approval of the requested Arena Development Project with the following conditions: 1. The approval of this Major Use Special Permit shall be subject to the recordation of the following documents prior to the issuance of any building permits for the proposed project: • Unity of Title or covenant in lieu thereof providing that the ownership, operation and maintenance of all common areas and facilities will be by the property owner. • Development Order specifying that the Development Order runs with the land and is binding on the Applicant, it successors and assigns, jointly or severally. 1 2. Pursuant to the Department of Public Works, the project requires plans for proposed sidewalk and swale area improvements prior to the issuance of a building permit. ,-) � - 8 9 .6.5 I]# 3. Pursuant to the Downtown NET Office, the applicant shall submit a parking plan for construction employees and temporary parking arrangements for the existing building while the new building is under construction; said parking plan shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning Department prior to the issuance of any building permits. 4. Pursuant to concerns raised by the Police and Fire Departments, the applicant shall work closely with said departments to satisfactorily resolve all life safety issues involved prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 5. Pursuant to concerns raised by the UDRB, the applicant shall address the design issues specified in the attached minutes from the UDRB meeting of October 22, 1997. 6. With the exception of the signs specifically included in the application for development approval (Section 8 of the Application book on file with the Department of Development, Building and Zoning), all other sign proposals shall be subject to a separate review and approval by the Director of the Department of Development, Building and Zoning (note: said review and approval does not require a separate Class II Special Permit). 7. Pursuant to the comments received by the Zoning Division, the applicant shall submit a survey and site plan for offsite parking spaces showing location and design of the parking lot(s); said lot(s) shall meet distance requirements as specified in Zoning Ordinance 11000. 8. Pursuant to the comments received by the Zoning Division, all driving lanes to be located on parcel "B" shall have a minimum width of ten feet (10'-0") and must comply with FDOT turn radius standards. 9. The proposed project shall be subject to the review and approval (with conditions, if applicable) of the Miami -Dade County Shoreline Development Review Committee. 10. Pursuant to the traffic study which was submitted by the applicant as part of this approval, a complete "Traffic control management plan" shall be produced and submitted to the City of Miami for review and approval prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for this project; said plan shall address all issues related to traffic control measures which will be utilized by the applicant during major arena events. 11. Pursuant to concerns raised by the Downtown Development Authority regarding linkage issues to and from the proposed arena to the remainder of Downtown Miami (across Biscayne Boulevard), the applicant shall address the following issues throughout the permitting and construction period: 54 a. Identification of approximately 4600 off -site parking spaces within a 10 minute walking radius of the project. b. Identification of approximately 2000 off -site parking spaces within . a 5 to 10 minute shuttle bus connection to the project c. Identification of the principal transit station connections within a 10 minute walking radius to the project. d. Identification of on-site/site perimeter Metrobus, charter bus and shuttle bus loading locations and circulation patterns serving the project. e. Identification of downtown area primary pedestrian pathways interconnecting parking, transit and core area employee/resident concentrations with the project. f. Identification of primary routes for shuttle and bus connections between remote parking, transit and area employee/neighborhood centers. g. Identification of environmental design and enhancement measures that address improvements to pedestrian pathways including lighting, security, aesthetic enhancements, crosswalks (with particular emphasis on Biscayne Boulevard), pedestrian signalization and signage. h. Identification of financial and operational responsibility for shuttle bus operations linking the project to public transit and parking facilities. i. Design and operational impact issues of a pedestrian bridge connection from the arena project to Bayside and Bayfront Park. j. Design and operational impact issues of surface road improvements to south side of Port Boulevard adjacent to Bayside project. k. Design and linkage issues of connecting a public baywalk along the bulkhead line of the FEC tract to existing and proposed baywalks to the public park lands to the south and north of the project. 1. Identification of "pathfinder" signage design and locations for pedestrian and vehicular traffic accessing the project through adjacent downtown areas including the Flagler Street core, Biscayne Boulevard, S.E. Overtown/Park West and Omni/Cultural Center districts. In addition to the conditions enumerated above, the applicant shall work cooperatively with the City of Miami and Miami -Dade County to comply with the following: 8-- 89 55 1. Compliance with all conditions and stipulations of the tri-party agreement; 2. Compliance with all conditions and stipulations set forth in the City of Miami/Miami-Dade County Purchase and Sale Agreement for the subject property; and 3. Compliance with all conditions and stipulations set forth in the covenants running with the property as executed and recorded. This approval shall also be subject to all additional conditions specified in the attached Development Order. 5(c CITY OF MIAMI URBAN DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ESOARD Meeting of October 22, 1997 UDRB Report for: AMERICAN AIRLINES ARENA Review of Major Use Special Permit proposal for development of the New Basketball Arena. Item: 1 of 1 Location: Biscayne Blvd. between NE 8`h Street and Port Boulevard. Applicant: Miami Heat / Arquitectonica. Case number: 97-114 Vote: Unanimous (6 to 0) UDRB Resolution: Proposal recommended for approval as presented in plans and supplementary materials submitted by the applicant, subject to two conditions: That the plaza area on the west side of the project, fronting Biscayne Boulevard, be revised an enhanced in a manner to be reviewed by staff, so that it present a more welcoming and "open" feeling as viewed from the Boulevard. It was commented that this may be achieved through a reconfiguration of the steps provided and landscape areas. 2. That the perimeter areas of the project be designed with the same care and attention to detail as the rest of the project, particular as pertains to the linkage of the project to existing and future projects around it. In particular, the vehicular driveway along the northern portion of the site, should be designed and paved in a manner that allows the safe interaction of pedestrians and vehicles. Staff Recommendations: In addition to those concerns expressed by the Urban Development Review Board, as captioned above, staff recommends that the linkage strategy with the Bayside Center to the South, which presently consists of a diagrammatic bridge, be further developed so as to ensure the proper and mutually beneficial interaction of both developments in the future. CITY OF MIAMI • DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT, BUILDING AND ZONING 444 SW 2"d Avenue, 3`d Floor • Miami, FI. 33130 R9 59 PAPPAS Sins _.. . ° r3 l < yyl 'S x• 2+ f ; 11. ` CAuSEwa TR. a• NQ • •. 7 4 e / / � I � {��ST a6W • �C 5 0 �, •) C s 1 • r s t - '• a W =�111r\ • S 3C 1 A i N.E. 10 �- 111114 11 J / T RAC T FA? �1 ! NEW WORLD CENTER BICENTENNIAL PARK II � VV 1 II II° !I U • s 1 1'• = 1•J _ r l O Z 1' - •• ..• ......................... ........ ...... Z XE. 8 ST. LY 43 1E uj iI s s• 1 • • • 7 • 1 • • 7 • • ♦ 7 ! • • .`•.... 2 O t 17 N N n l• 1• IIKIuIr NIN, •Is [al tt j ► • 71 Q I+I�MI Ml •6Ns 1 ••:M Q• M t l3 N Is • 17 r• 1• - 1{ ' 11: 17Nen�,n�0 • • ell ulf ! rtr\1 ) sNr 7 : T•'C. VIAN N r p . FEOE AL INI OADE coMMI�IrTN Y 11 1, N 1. r, LL� Q COEGE NEW WORLD . N CTR TR •A• T. JUSTICE - ) Tt '•' COLLEGE' SOUARE • 7 { s • , SUB 1 O CENTER _ N = ' .N 'sue. V/1 Isrlrs N 1• 1• = ZI ` o —N.E . 3 ST. O II• • ) • . • a • 1 r • { ) • a • 7 • rl • • 1 { , • s a N N • � 99 N • r• •• 11 17 e N Is N 17 M • 27 1�12l lair• •IA r) I• 19 sell ii N.E. 2 S•T. - r • , { �s • a • • • , • • • , i W 0 •~ ♦ � N orP 3 D 12 If M 1, 1• r, 1• N 13 is 1• A 1• r, 1• r , I• N.E. I\ u � .3 r s r{ •r .• • I t a X, J ?u- 89.5/ •__...,..«..r.,�,r•.•�.::.+-�*i�Y♦+;+`r."`t_"�'. ".'!'�,rw,.^•.. ;y�y..+ww'_';rtiws.�..,.`.�.. -. ...» -,... ,.. _ _ Y.: �.i� ^,Ems r q S . wM. ry r �''4 �"R �..',,�,�� _ i• s: . J ,.,_ t ,�♦�'+rsr ,�� ,.Jf �.. ;t.,', • �i .'t �+'2�ft'-y�"'� «>r.," ...!'rf•��!,'�'- ��'�"T'�� f .' �. i'i J.a�.i 1. yr �y t sli ON Sri ty '� .k \ •.j' 1 �°.+� •Rsr «may -� *4ti ` 5r. �li��� y ,.� �_ i 38-- 89 0 Angela George ! LFIQ] C I T Y O F M I A M I ARPS PROPERTY SYSTEM LIEN INQUIRY BY FOLIO / ADDRESS (15) PAGE NO: !0001] FOLIO [010000001201 ADDRESS [ 6013 ( ) [BISCAYNE ] [BLVD] UNIT [ ] LEGAL: 1) MIAMI NORTH 4) NE 9 ST & S/L OF NE 6 ST EXT LESS 2) PB B-41 5) BEG 275.98FTE OF NE COR OF LOT 2 3) TR E OF C/L OF BISC BLVD BETW C/L *** CITY OWNED *** LIEN NO TYPE STATUS DATE COMP / ACCTNO FRONTAGE COST/AMT DUE SELECT ACTION: 1-INQ NO MORE RECORDS Window ARPSWIN/1 at PRODUCTION Date: 1/16/98 Time: 1:35:32PM ENTER ACTION [1 ] XMIT [ ] 9 6 Pg=1 FORM RCV LTAI I V- Major Use Special Permit for Basketball Properties, Ltd. Arquitectonica International, Inc. Curtis & Rogers Design Studios, Inc. , David Plummer & Associates, Inc. PAWA Complex International, Inc. ' Shutts & Bou Resolution 98-89 Item PZ-1 from the 1/27/98 Commission Meeting �j � r AMERICAN AIRLINES ARENA TABLE OF CONTENTS ARTICLE I. Project Information A. Introduction B. Application for a Major Use Special Permit C. Class I and Class II Special Permit Request D. Disclosure of Ownership E. Ownership Affidavit F. Directory of Project Principal G. City of Miami Zoning Atlas Map H. City of Miami Future Land Use Map 1. Aerial and Location Map J. Ownership List K. Project Data Sheets and Summary ARTICLE H. Project Description A. Zoning Ordinance No. 11000 1. Section 1304.2.1 Application Forms; Supplementary Materials 2. Section 1702.2.1 General Report 3. Section 1702.2.2 Major Use Special Permit Concept Plan 4. Section 1702.2.3 Development Impact Study Tab 1 Survey of Property Tab 2 Traffic Impact Study Tab 3 Utility Plan Tab 4 Economic Impact Analysis Tab 5 Minority Construction Employment Plan Tab 6 Architectural and Access Drawings Tab 7 Landscape Plan Tab 8 Sign Plan J8- 89 I p 7] I �v p Elk COW kWW 4PA w. P, -WOO Fl t low — dMENNIPMEK-7 F .7 11 1 E it 17 AMERICAN AIRLINES ARENA Article I Project Information p- "sin AMERICAN AIRLINES ARENA INTRODUCTION The American Airlines Arena is a 1,415,921 gross square foot Multi -Use Major Public Facility which has been designated by the City of Miami as a Waterfront Retail Specialty Center. The facility will have a total capacity of 24,000 seats, 20,000 of which are fixed seating in the basketball mode. The Project is located east of Biscayne Boulevard between Port Boulevard and N.E. 8th Street in the City of Miami, Florida. The Property, which contains 14.63 ± acres, is zoned PR (parks, recreation and open space) and designated parks and recreation on the City's Future Land Use Map. Therefore, the use of the Property as a Multi -Use Major Public Facility is consistent with the zoning and master plan and compatible with existing uses in the area. The Arena will be a state of the art facility planned, designed and constructed in conformity with current Facility NBA Standards and the current standards of the International Hockey League and the American Hockey League. The facility will include marshaling/loading areas designed and constructed to support the occupancy of professional basketball and professional hockey franchises and to host other events. The Arena will contain multiple concourses, as well as mechanical and service levels. Suites and premium seating is provided along with numerous amenities, such as clubs, restaurants and shops. The facility also includes approximately 37,500 square feet of office space for use by the Miami Heat Limited Partnership, other sport franchises and Arena management purposes. 1,407 parking spaces are required by Code for the Arena. 1,147 of the parking spaces will be located onsite, in the below ground parking area. The 260 remaining required parking spaces will be provided offsite, but in close proximity to the Property. �1t ARQUITECTONICA MIAMI HEAT ARENA MIAMI ARQ. PROJECT NO. 9619 11-06-97 PROJECT DATA CALCULATIONS: 1. SITE DATA: A. ZONING: CITY OF MIAMI- "PR" PARKS, RECREATION & OPEN SPACE. B. SITE "A": 637,283 S.F. OR 14.63 ACRES. (NET) 913,560 S.F. OR 20.97 ACRES. (GROSS) C. OPEN SPACE: 261,542 S.F. OR 6.00 ACRES (SITE A). 2. BUILDING AREAS: GROSS NET A. PARKING LEVEL 4'-0": 449,955 S.F. 446,987 S.F. 980 TOTAL SPACES (963+ 17 ACCESS.) B. EVENT LEVEL 14'-9" : 194,365 S.F. 172,859 S.F. EVENT PARKING 73,306 S.F. 67,753 S.F. 167 TOTAL (162+ 5 ACCESS.) RETAIL 14,232 S.F. 14,232 S.F. SERVICE CORRIDOR 3,963 S.F. 3,963 S.F. ARCADE 3,256 S.F. ** Page 1 of 3 11/11/97 5:26 PM ARQUITFCTONICA GROSS NET C. MEZZ. LEVEL 27'-9" : 28,305 S.F. 20,716 S.F. PRACTICE COURT 11,055 S.F. 11,055 S.F. PRAC. COURT BALCONY 1,420 S.F. *' OFFICES 34,433 S.F. 34,433 S.F. OFFICE TERRACE 7,715 S.F. ** RETAIL / RESTAURANT 9,902 S.F. 9,902 S.F. TERRACE 56,793 S.F. ** D. MAIN CONCOURSE 41'-6" : 88,390 S.F. 71,317 S.F. PLAZA 50,936 S.F. ** RETAIL / RESTAURANT 9,902 S.F. 9,902 S.F. E. SUITE LEVEL 56'-9" : 88,151 S.F. 63,158 S.F. F. UPPER CONCOURSE 70'-5" : 68,841 S.F. 52,391 S.F. G. BALCONY LEVEL 85'-3" : 48,215 S.F. 32,191 S.F. H. UPPER SEATING 113'-11" : 30,738 S.F. 17,787 S.F. 1. MECHANICAL LEVEL 125-11": 30,714 S.F. 14,703 S.F. J. ARENA BOWL: 121,236 S.F. 121,236 S.F. * AREAS NOT INCLUDED IN S.F. SUB -TOTAL FOR THE PURPOSE OF DETERMINING THE PARKING COUNT REQUIRED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OFMIAMI. SUB -TOTAL- 1,305,703 S.F. ** 631,179 S.F. TOTAL- 1,425, 823 S.F. 1,164,585 S.F. ** AREAS NOT INCLUDED ARE AS FOLLOWS: ARCADES, PLAZAS, TERRACES, ETC. Page 2 of 3 11/11/97 5:26 PM ARQU1TECTONiCA 3. BUILDING HEIGHT: REQUIRED: PROVIDED: 4. SETBACKS: NO HEIGHT LIMITATION 167'-0" +/- AT MAX. ELEV. REQUIRED: NOT APPLICABLE (N/A) PROVIDED: (TAKEN FROM MAIN ARENA BUILDING) NORTH- 77'-9"+/- SOUTH- 184'-6"+/- EAST- 320'-0"+/- TO EDGE OF EAST PROPERTY LINE (SITE "A") 641'-8"+/- TO BULKHEAD WEST- 174'-1"+/- TO ARENA PROPERTY LINE 5. PARKING: TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED: TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED 6. OFFSTREET LOADING: LOADING BERTHS REQUIRED: LOADING BERTHS PROVIDED 1147 SPACES 631,179 S.F.:-500 = 1262.3 OR 1263; 1263 + 300 EMPLOYEES = 1563 1563-10% REDUCTION FOR METROMOVER PROXIMITY 1563-156= 1407 REQUIRED SPACES 1407-1147= 260 SPACES PROVIDED OFFSITE (4)- 12' X 35' (1)-12'X55' (5)- 12' X 55' (6)- 16' X 60' Page 3 of 3 11/11/97 5:26 PM zam -; lb-m�Qo AKRZ- 7tl a01��0 ,Y II' ME i coeco� PIn �::�we�aoo i 010 I� 1 • ao�savoc woQ�o�oa� ;avoosaa�� 911. 11 R42111; ,��Opquit I'Ol R-O E4a�Yrilrri" itri��yir ��iWiYY\�f �g� a� oMaOoac woo��w�u �a�0��oaQE ""� � �GGGriiGGi iGGGi�GGGi I BISCAYNE BAY LEGEND DI CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT :REATION 'ICE AND RESIDENTIAL LORIESUAND TRANSPORTATION IERAL COMMERCIAL ;TRICT COMMERCIAL 'ANT EXHIBIT NO. p AMERICAN AIRLINES ARENA FUTURE LAND USE MAP 1 TO: City of Miami Hearing Boards Division Planning, Building and Zoning Division NUMBER OF LABELS: 14* *MAILING LABELS HAVE BEEN ARRANGED IN ALPHABETICAL ORDER BY THE FIRST LETTER IN THE FIRST NAME. DUPLICATIONS, WITH THE SAME NAMES AND ADDRESSES, HAVE BEEN REMOVED. '1�1� Florida Real Estate Decisions, Inc. ++ 13899 Biscayne Blvd. Suite 110 Miami, F1. 33181 (305)757-6884 3195 K. Powerline Rd. r Suite 104 Pompano Beach, Fl. 33069 September 16, 1997 (954)761-9003 180 St. David's Way West Palm Beach, F1. 33414 (561)798-4423 City of Miami Hearing Boards Division Planning, Building and Zoning Division 275 N.W. 2 Street, Room 226 Miami, Florida 33128 Re: Property Owners List Within 375 feet of: A PARCEL OF LAND WITHIN THE FOLLOWING BOUNDARIES NORTH: N.E. 8TH STREET SOUTH: PORT BOULEVARD EAST: BISCAYNE BAY WEST: BISCAYNE BOULEVARD This is to certify that the attached ownership list, map and mailing labels are a complete and accurate representation of the real estate property and property owners within 375 feet of the subject property listed above. This reflects the most current records on file in the Dade County Tax Assessor's office. Sincerely, Ray N . " nt RNH/lv cc: Judith A. Burke, Esq. SHUTTS & BOWEN LLP 201 South Biscayne Boulevard Miami, Florida 33131 01-0100-000-012 301 BISCAYNE BLVD MIAMI NORTH PB B-41 TR E OF C/L OF BISC BLVD BETW C/L NE 9 ST & S/L OF NE 6 ST EXT LESS BEG 275.98FTE OF NE COR OF LOT 2 BLK 61N TH N 75 DEG W187.72FT N16 DEG W 346.14FT N127.26FT SELY434.18FT SELY & NELY AD 73.29FT NELY & ELY 1140.89FT TO BLKHD/L S143.5FT W1060.12FT TO POB & LESS SPUR TRACK LOT SIZE 1251294 SQ FT 01-0100-000-0125 585 BISCAYNE BLVD MIAMI NORTH PB B-41 BEG 275.98FTE OF NE COR OF LOT 2 BLK 61N TH N 75 DEG W 187.72FT N 16 DEG W 346.14FT N127.26FT SELY434.18FT SELY & NELY AD 73.29FT NELY & ELY 1140.89FT TO BLKHD/L S143.5FT W1060.12FT TO POB LESS SPUR TRACK LOT SIZE 152112 SQ FT 01-0100-000-0150 MIAMI NORTH PB B-41 THAT PORT OF TR E AKA SPUR TRACK SERVING DODGE ISLAND OF C/L OF BISC BLVD BETW C/L NE 9 ST & S/L OF NE 6 ST EXT 01-0100-000-0380 899 BISCAYNE BLVD MIAMI NORTH PB B-41 BEG 50FTS OF SE COR OF BLVD & C/L NE 9ST EXT E50FT N50FT E105.5FT SLY264.5FT W87FT N43FT W48.4FT N25FT W20FT N145FT TO POB CIT1 ,F MIAMI 300 N BISC BLVD STE 400 MIAMI FL 33132 DADE COUNTY GSA R/E MGMT 111 NW 1 ST STE 2460 MIAMI FL 33128-1907 FEC R R CO ST AUGUSTINE FLA COMPT F E C RR CO % J E CORBETT MGR MGR REAL ESTATE ST AUGUSTINE FLA 32086 FLORIDA REAL ESTATE DECISIONS, INC. 1 01-0100-000-052, 401 BISCAYNE BLVD MIAMI NORTH PB B-41 TR E OF BLVD BET THE S/L NE 6 ST PROD ELY & SLY/L SE 2 ST PROD ELY WITH RIP-RTS BAY -FRONT PARK & CITY YACHT BASIN PART 2 OF ASSESSMENT LESS LEASEHOLD TO RESTAURANT ASSOCIATES IND INC & LESS THAT PORT DESIGNATED AS TR B MIA HARBOR BAYFRONT PARK PROJ DEEDED TO USA PER OR 12590-1427 FOLIO 01-0100-000-0521 & LESS THAT PORT DESIGNATED AS BAYSIDE FOLIO 01-0100-000-0522 & LESS THAT PORT DESIGNATED AS PARKING GARAGE FOR BAYSIDE FOLIO 01-0100-000-0523 01-0100-000-0522 401 BISCAYNE BLVD MIAMI NORTH PB B-41 BEG 703.43FTE & 10OFTS OF NE COR OF BLK 61 CONT S181.09FT E23.83FT S41.50FT W23.83FT S174.50FT E23.83FT S41.50FT W179.58FT S25FT W157.27FT SELY & ELY197.52FT E140.96FT SE604.49FT S 65 DEG E 270.56FT NELY148.28FT E49.24FT NELY714.32FT NW185.10FT SWLY549FT W58.54FT SW86.76FT SLY & SWLY 107.10FT W26.87FT N 65 DEG W 61.23FT NELY52.25FT N 65 DEG W 60FT SWLY52.25FT N 65 DEG W 156FT NELY52.25FT N 65 DEG W 60FT SWLY 52.25FT N 65 DEG W 49FT NWLY-NLY 339.60FT E52.25FT N60FT W52.25FT N156FT E52.25FT N60FT W52.25FT N176.38FT W275.42FT TO POB LOT SIZE 569621 SQ FT A/K/A BAYSIDE CITY jF MIAMI 275 NW 2 ST MIAMI FL 33128-1741 ROUSE MIAMI INC PO BOX 833 COLUMBIA MD 21044 FLORIDA REAL ESTATE DECISIONS, INC. 2 01-0100-000-052-1 501 BISCAYNE BLVD MIAMI NORTH PB B-41 BEG 703.43FTE & 100FTS OF NE COR OF BLK 61 CONT S181.09FT E23.83FT S41.50FT W23.83FT S174.50FT E23.83FT S41.50FT W179.58FT S25FT W157.27FT N 16 DEG W 338.56FT N 12 DEG W 7.35FT N 39 DEG E 65.42FT NELY & ELY AD 193.85FT E203.50FT TO POB LOT SIZE 164535FT A/K/A PARKING GARAGE FOR BAYSIDE 01-0100-000-0550 435 NW 1 CT MIAMI NORTH PB B-41 BEG NE COR LOT 1 BLK 76E PB B-41 N1050FT E150FT S TO X WITH N/L FEC WYE R/W PER DB R/466 ELY ALG N/L OF WYE R/W TO X WITH W/L OF N MIAMI AVE S15FT E150FT N15FT E350FT S15FT E100FT N15FT E700FT NSFT E150FT SESFT NE50FT SE100FT W1521FT N15FT W & SWLY ALG S/L FEC WYE R/W TO X WITH E/L FEC MAINTRACT R/W S TO X WITH S/L NW 5 ST W150FT TO POB LESS BEG 12.50FTN OF SW COR OF BLK 57 TH W143.20FT TO E/R/W/L OF METRORAIL N472.87FT E96.38FT SELY AD 209.1OFT TO A PT OF R/C CONT SELY AD 222.96FT S37.63FT SWLY AD 39.24FT W47.68FT TO POB LOT SIZE 266382 SQ FT 01-0102-010-1070 900 BISCAYNE BLVD MIAMI NORTH PB B-41 LOTS 8 9 & 10 BLK 21 LOT SIZE 150.000 X 150 01-0104-000-1010 824 BISCAYNE BLVD MIAMI NORTH PB B-41 LOT 1 & S50FT OF LOT 4 & 5 BLK 40 LOT SIZE IRREGULAR ROUSE-MIAMI INC PO BOX 833 COLUMBIA MD 21044 FEC R R CO ST AUGUSTINE FLA COMPT THOMAS R POST 901 NE 2 AVE STE 2000 MIAMI FL 33132-1710 INTERCAP-SUCHMAN JT VENTURE 2333 PONCE DE LEON BLVD #1100 CORAL GABLES FL 33134-5427 FLORIDA REAL ESTATE DECISIONS, INC. 3 01-0104-000-10: 844 BISCAYNE BLVD MIAMI NORTH PB B-41 E140FT OF LOT 2 E140FT OF LOT 3 BLK 40 LOT SIZE 100.000 X 140 01-0104-000-1030 210 NE 9 ST MIAMI NORTH PB B-41 W10FT OF LOTS 2 & 3 BLK 40. LOT SIZE 1000 SQUARE FEET 01-0104-000-1040 853 NE 2 AVE MIAMI NORTH PB B-41 N10OFT OF LOT 4 N10OFT OF LOT 5 BLK 40 LOT SIZE 100.000 X 90 01-0104-000-1050 821 NE-2 AVE MIAMI NORTH PB B-41 N42FT OF LOTS 6 & 7 BLK 40 LOT SIZE 42.000 X 90 01-0104-000-1060 806 BISCAYNE BLVD MIAMI NORTH PB B-41 S108FT OF LOTS 6 & 7 & ALL OF LOT 8 BLK 40 LOT SIZE IRREGULAR 01-0104-000-1070 812 BISCAYNE BLVD MIAMI NORTH PB B-41 LOT 9 BLK 40 LOT SIZE 50.000 X 150 01-0104-000-1080 820 BISCAYNE BLVD MIAMI NORTH PB B-41 LOT 10 BLK 40 LOT SIZE 50.000 X 150 INT.. __-'AP SUCHMAN JT VENTURE 2333 PONCE DE LEON BLVD #1100 CORAL GABLES FL 33134-5427 INTERCAP SUCHMAN JT VENTURE 2333 PONCE DE LEON BLVD #1100 CORAL GABLES FL 33134-5427 INTERCAP SUCHMAN JT VENTURE 2333 PONCE DE LEON BLVD #1100 CORAL GABLES FL 33134-5427 INTERCAP SUCHMAN J T VENTURE 2333 PONCE DE LEON BLVD STE 1100 CORAL GABLES FL 33134-5427 INTERCAP SUCHMAN JT VENTURE 2333 PONCE DE LEON BLVD #1100 CORAL GABLES FL 33134-5427 INTERCAP SUCHMAN JT VENTURE 2333 PONCE DE LEON BLVD #1100 CORAL GABLES FL 33134-5427 INTERCAP SUCHMAN JT VENTURE 2333 PONCE DE LEON BLVD #1100 CORAL GABLES FL 33134-5427 PWRIDA REAL ESTATE DECISIONS, INC. 4 01-0104-010-10'L 728 BISCAYNE BLVD MIAMI NORTH PB B-41 LOTS 1 TO 3 INC BLK 41 LOT SIZE 150.000 X 153 01-0104-010-1020 741 NE 2 AVE MIAMI NORTH PB B-41 LOT 4 & LOT 5 BLK 41 LOT SIZE 150.000 X 90 01-0104-010-1030 225 NE 7 ST MIAMI NORTH PB B-41 LOTS 6 & 7 & 8 THRU 10 INC BLK 41 LOT SIZE IRREGULAR 01-0106-000-1010 MIAMI NORTH PB B-41 N5FT LOT 1 BLK 60 N/A/W M & B OF 37-53-54-41 UNDER FOLIO NUMBERS 01000 00 55 & 01000 00 33 01-0106-000-1020 666 BISCAYNE BLVD MIAMI NORTH PB B-41 LOTS 2 & 3 N105FT LOT 4-5 & 6 LESS W10FT OF N105FT OF LOT 6 FOR ST BLK 60 LOT SIZE IRREGULAR 01-0106-000-2010 215 NE 6 ST MIAMI NORTH SUB OF BLK 60 PB 1-185 LOTS 7 THRU 9 LESS W17.5FT OF LOT 7 FOR R/W LOT SIZE 13500 SQFT PANb.ufNIOS LTD % SCURTIS - PO BOX 1428 MIAMI FL 33133 PANELINIOS LTD % SCURTIS - PO BOX 1428 MIAMI FL 33133 PANELINIOS LTD % SCURTIS - PO BOX 1428 MIAMI FL 33133 REF ONLY 666 BISCAYNE BOULEVARD LTD 200 BISCAYNE BLVD STE# 2410 MIAMI FL 33131 FREEDON TOWER GENERAL PARTNERSHI' 3155 N 77 AVE MIAMI FL 33122 01-0106-000-2020 FREEDON TOWER GENERAL PARTNERSHII 600 BISCAYNE BLVD 3155 N 77 AVE MIAMI NORTH SUB OF BLK 60 MIAMI FL 33122 PB 1-185 LOTS 10 TO 14 INC LOT SIZE 24794 SQFT FLORIDA REAL ESTATE DECISIONS, INC. 5 01-0106-010-101 520 BISCAYNE BLVD MIAMI NORTH PB B-41 S70FT LOT 1 & LOT 15 BLK 61 LOT SIZE IRREGULAR 01-0106-010-1020 540 BISCAYNE BLVD MIAMI NORTH PB B-41 LOT 2 & N5FT LOT 1 BLK 61 LOT SIZE 9920 SQUARE FEET 01-0106-010-1030 230 NE 6 ST. MIAMI NORTH PB B-41 LOTS 3 & 4 BLK 61 LOT SIZE 100.000 X 150 01-4137-039-0010 1075 BISCAYNE BLVD NEW WORLD CENTER BICENTENNIAL PB 140=50 /PARK TR A LOT SIZE 30.33 AC MARK PARTNERS LTD PO BOX 8577 FT LAUDERDALE FL 33310 EAST BRICKELL ASSOC LTD PO BOX 8577 FT LAUDERDALE FL 33310 PARK A PARTNERS LTD PO BOX 8577 FT LAUDERDALE FL 33310 CITY OF MIAMI 3500 PAN AMERICAN DR MIAMI FL 33133-5504 FLORIDA REAL ESTATE DECISIONS, INC. 6 BICENTENNIAL PARK y li C ^' (140-50) I�i �- L J r AC r A' - I � 00 i ' o - ' i2ar' I SIMPS0N �1 J m �/ ISLA- a r I NO s T. Subject TURNING BASIN l a a s I..a s le Ral AND 6 HICUTAR - R T CAUSEWAY F'OftT OF MIAMI • ,. 11 It ,; r. . 5 ST. 9 • t ST. .o ,t 14 I, 1e r -17 f O Sv 3 ST.T. e w"Pik 4 ic If I) 1• I. 11 11 1t M •�L_ '', .. ltlr .� f l f•. t 1' � fe 2 5T. .. f 9 a 666 BISCAYNE BOULEVARD LTD CI OF MIANI CITY MIAMI 200 BISCAYNE BLVD STEP 2410 275 2 ST 3500 PAN CAN DR MIAMI FL 33131 MIAMI FL 3128-1741 MIAMI FL 331 -5504 CI MIAMZ DADE COUNTY EAST BRICIUnZ ASSOC LTD 300 A BZ VD STE 400 GSA R/E MGMT PO BOX 8577 MIAMI FL 33132 ill NW 1 ST STE 2460 FT LAUDERDALE FL 33310 MIAMI FL 33128-1901 F E C RR CO FRBEDON TOWER GENERAL PAInIUMBIP IRTERCAP SUCBMAN JT VENTURE % J E CORBETT MGR 3155 N 77 AVE 2333 PONCE DE LEON BLVD #1100 MGR REAL ESTATE MIAMI FL 33122 CORAL GABLES FL 33134-5427 ST AUGUSTINE FLA 32086 MARK A PARTNERS LTD PANELINZOS LTD PARR A PARTNERS LTD PO BOX 8577 % SCURTIS - PO BOX 1428 PO BOX 8577 FT LAUDERDALE FL 33310 MIAMI FL 33133 FT LAUDERDALE FL 33310 ROUSE-MIAMI INC THCMAS R POST PO BOX 833 901 NE 2 AVE STE 2000 COLUMBIA MD 21044 MIAMI FL 33132-1710 AMERICAN AIRLINES ARENA Article H Project Description AMERICAN AIRLINES ARENA MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT FOR BASKETBALL PROPERTIES, LTD. Zoning Ordinance No. 11000 1. Section 1304.2.1 Application forms; supplementary materials (a) Statement of ownership and control of the proposed development of activity. The Disclosure of Ownership and Ownership Affidavit are provided in Article I. (b) Statement describing in detail the character and intended use of the development of activity. The American Airlines Arena is 1,415,921 gross square foot multi -use major public facility which has been designated as a Waterfront Speciality Center. The facility will have a total seating capacity of 24,000 seats, 20,000 of which are fixed seating in basketball mode. The project is located on the F.E.C. Tract east of Biscayne Boulevard between Port Boulevard and N.E. 8 Street in the City of Miami, Florida. The property is zoned for (Parks, Recreation and Open Space) and designated Parks and Recreation in the City's future land use map. Therefore, the use of the property as a multi -use major public facility is consistent with the zoning and master plan and compatible with existing uses in the area. Dade County is the Contract Purchaser of the 14.63 acres site which includes 0.9 acres to be dedicated to the State of Florida for Biscayne Boulevard widening. Basketball Properties, Ltd., the applicant, is the Development Manager of the site upon which the Arena is be constructed. The American Airlines Arena (the "Arena") is to be a state of the art, multi -use major public facility designed and constructed in conformity with current National Basketball Association ("NBA") standards and the current standards of the International Hockey League and the American Hockey League and shall include, without limitation, marshalling/loading areas, planned designed and constructed to support the occupancy of professional basketball and professional hockey franchises and to host other events such as family shows, concerts, live theater, etc. The Arena component shall be a building containing a minimum of 680,000 square feet of space with at least three concourses, as well as mechanical and service levels and shall include appropriate amenities, such as clubs, restaurants and shops, among other features as more particularly described in the documents included in Tab 6, 7 and 8, Article III of this application. The Arena shall include the following approximate capacities for general and premium seating: A. Approximately 17,000 seats for hockey. B. Approximately 20,000 for basketball C. Approximately 24,000 seats for special events (including floor seating). The Arena capacities listed above include a minimum of 20 suites and minimum of 800 suite style seats together with premium seating. The premium seatings and Suites will have exclusive access to their patrons and will be serviced by separate catering, service and maintenance support. The Arena shall be equipped with modern technological systems for acoustics, utilities and seating configurations (including adjustable for exchangeable seating systems designed to perfect the difference in sight lines for basketball and hockey), a basketball floor, basketball standards, modern telecommunications systems, a modern HVAC system, emergency generators, hockey dashboards, event transition equipment, food and beverage facilities, live television production facilities (not including production equipment), loading/unloading areas, mechanical systems, lighting and video distribution systems, ice plant facilities, storage facilities, furnishing, vertical transportation systems, environmental graphics and signage, video display boards, score boards, exterior signage, advertising displays, sound distribution and other features designed to provide patron, employee and tenant convenience. In addition, sufficient space will be set aside for dedicated pedestrian walkways marhshalling/service areas (delivery trucks, touring show trucks, truck maneuvering, and storage), an entry plaza and other public areas on the Site. The Arena shall include approximately 37,500 square feet of office space similar in quality to that found In Class A office buildings located in the downtown areas of the City. The Arena shall include appropriate locker room facilities for professional sport franchise licensees, as well as separate locker rooms for visiting teams, officials and performers/stars. The locker room facilities shall be a size and finished and equipped in a manner comparable with other modern, state -of -the art sports facilities housing professional teams. The Arena shall also include practice facilities for basketball and a weight and training room. 2 The Arena shall include appropriate space for the sale of soft concessions and hard concessions. In addition, up to 30,000 rentable square feet of permanent retail shall be constructed outside the ticket secure zone as part of the initial construction of the Arena. The Arena shall be designed in compliance with all applicable laws relating to individuals with disabilities, including the Americans and Disability Act and all applicable accessibility guidelines. The Arena shall include approximately 167 reserved parking spaces for use by the Manager, Miami Heath Team personnel, ticket buyers and Team and Arena visitors (the "Arena Garage"). In addition to the Arena Garage, the Arena shall include approximately 980 parking spaces to be constructed on the Site (the "On -Site Garage"). The On -Site Garage shall be designed to facilitate traffic flow during peak usage periods associated with events and designed so the it can be operated as a public parking facility during non- event periods. The Arena also includes the construction of the roadways associated with access and egress to the arena. The Project consists of seven main levels described as following • First Parking Level, will accommodate approximately 980 spaces for arena parking. • Events Level, street level includes Arena operations maintenance and security facilities, main commissary, food service, offices, median facilities will house team support functions, locker rooms, ticketing, court side lounges, loading dock, storage and staging functions, mechanical and electrical services (includes the Arena Garage). • Plaza Level, retail outlets, the Miami Heat offices, Miami Heat training, practice court, and entry lobby. • Main Course Level, represents the main concourse level serving the lower tier seating, as well as concession and washroom facilities. • Suite Level, will have restricted access to private corporate lounges. • Upper Balcony Level, will provide access to upper tier bowl Beatings, service areas and washroom facilities. 3 • Upper Seating Level, will provide access to, press, TV broadcast, technical facilities and service areas. • Mechanical Level, includes mechanical distribution equipment, access to catwalks and platform areas with the room trusses. The Site has been extensively landscaped including construction of plazas, perimeter sidewalks, outdoor public spaces as further described in Tab 7, Article III. (c) General location map, showing relation of the site or activity for which special permit is sought to major streets, schools, existing utilities, shopping areas, important physical features in and adjoining the project or activity and the like. A location map and an aerial map indicating the surrounding streets and properties are included in Article I. (d) . A site plan containing the title of the project and the names of the project planner and developer, date, and north arrow and, based on an exact survey of the property drawn to a scale of sufficient size to show: The site plan is located under Tab 6, Article III. (1) Boundaries of the project, any existing streets, building, watercourses, easements and section lines; The boundaries of the project and the location of existing streets and easements are shown on the survey located under Tab 1, Article III. (2) Exact location of all buildings and structures; The exact location of all existing structures located on the property is shown on the survey located under Tab 1, Article III. (3) Access and traffic flow and how vehicular traffic will be separated from pedestrian and other types of traffic; A detailed analysis of the site access and traffic flow for the development is provided in the Traffic Impact Analysis located under Tab 2, Article III. Essentially, vehicular access for users will be from South Bayshore Drive. The internal circulation ramps are located within the property and will provide an efficient and secure access for the users. (4) Off-street parking and off-street loading area; Off-street Parking The Code requires 1,407 off -site parking spaces. [1,563 spaces less 10% reduction for 600 ft. proximity to transit ROW.] Calculation of parking required is 1 space per 500 sq. ft. of FAR plus 1 space per employee. The project is providing 1,147 off-street parking spaces on -site. This results in a shortfall of 260 spaces. The Code permits up 25% of required parking to be located off -site under contract with parking facility/property owner within 600 ft. [25% x 1,407 = 351 spaces]. The applicant will enter into a parking contract or contracts with parking facilities/property owners in accordance with 9.18.1 of the City of Miami Code requirements prior to issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy. Off -Street loading area provisions The Code requires the following number of off-street loading areas; four (4) no. 12' x 35' loading areas One (1) no. 12' x 55' loading areas The following loading ares have been provided on the south side of the arena as shown on the sit plan in Tab 6; five (5) no. 12' x 55' loading areas six (6) no. 16' x 65' loading areas for broadcast vehicles The number of provided exceeds the code requirement. (5) Recreational facilities locations; The entire Multi Use Major Facility is considered a recreational facility. 5 (6) Screens and buffers; Landscape and buffer are indicated on the Planting Plan under Tab 7, Article III. (7) Refuse collections areas; Waste collection will be provided by the City of Miami or by a private company. (8) Access to utilities and points of utilities hookups. All utilities be underground. Access and connections to site utilities are discussed in Site Utility Study located Under Tab 3, Article III. (e) Tabulations of total gross acreage in the project and the percentages thereof proposed to be devoted to the permitted uses and ground coverage. Multi -Use Major Public Facility Building Footprint: 449,955 S.F. - 913,560 S.F. = 49.25% Ground Coverage in Site "A". (f) Tabulation showing: (1) The derivation of numbers of off-street parking and off-street loading spaces shown in (d) above. (2) Total price density in dwelling units per acre. N/A (g) If common facilities (such as recreation areas of structures, private streets, common open space, etc.) are to be provided for the development, statements as to how such common facilities are to be provided and permanently maintained. N/A (h) Storm drainage and sanitary sewerage plans. Storm drainage, water distribution, waste water and solid waste generation provisions are discussed in the Site Utility Study under Tab 3, Article III. Cel (1) Architectural definitions for buildings in the development; exact number of dwelling units, size, and types, together with typical floor plans of each type. Refer to Project Data Sheet in Article I for Description of Building Floor Plans are included in Tab 6 Architectural and Access Drawings (j) Plans for signs, if any. Tab 8, Article III. Wall inserted matrix graphic lighting element. American Airlines free standing site feature. Airplane shadow depictions on roof. The above signs are consistent with the code and are, specifically approved, as shown, under this MUSP application. (k) Landscaping plan, including types, sizes and locations of vegetation and decorative shrubbery, and showing provisions for irrigation and future maintenance. Landscaping plan including types, sizes and locations of vegetation decorative shrubbery and showing provisions for irrigation and future maintenance. See Planting and Irrigation Plan under Tab 8, Article III. (1) Plans for recreation facilities, if any, including location and general description of buildings for such use. The entire Multi Use Major Public Facility is considered a recreational facility. (m) Such additional data, maps, plans, or statements as may be required for the particular use or activity involved. The drawings submitted with this application are located under Tab 6 and 7, Article III. (n) Such additional data as the applicant may believe is pertinent to the proper consideration of the site and development plan. The drawings submitted with this application are located under Tab 6, 7 & 8. 2. Section 1702.2.1 General Report (a) Property ownership or ownerships and beneficial interest within the boundaries of the area proposed for Major Use Special Permit. 7 Statement of Ownership and beneficial interest within the boundaries of the area proposed for the Major Use Special Permit are provided in Article I. (b) The nature of the unified interest or control. N/A (c) Survey of the proposed area showing property lines and ownership. A copy of the Boundary Survey is included under Tab 1, Article III. (d) Materials to demonstrate the relationship of the elements listed in (4) preceding to surrounding area characteristics. The drawings submitted with this application are located under Tab 6, Article III. (e) Existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan designations for the area on and around the lands proposed for Major Use Special Permit. The existing zoning designation for the property pursuant to City of Miami Ordinance No. 11000, is parks and recreation. The Zoning Atlas Map is located in Article I and indicates the existing and surrounding zoning. The comprehensive plan future land use designation for the property is parks and recreation and is shown on the land use map located in Article I. (f) Analysis demonstrating consistency and concurrency with the adopted comprehensive neighborhood plan. The future land use element of the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan designates the property Parks and Recreation. The Parks and Recreation designation allows Multi Use Major Public Facilities. Therefore, the proposed development is consistent with the City's Plan. 3. Section 1702.2.2 Major Use Special Permit Concept Plan. a. Relationships of the concept plan to surrounding existing and proposed future uses. Article II contains a written narrative of this project outlining proposed uses, activities and architectural character. The traffic study located in Tab 2 contains descriptions of the project's relationship to traffic, pedestrian movements, and transportation access. Building elevations, sections and perspectives showing the proposed materials, vertical profile and height, and orientation to streets is included 8 in the drawings submitted with this Application. The list of Drawings submitted is found under Tab 7, Article III. b. Existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan principals and designations. The project conforms to the PR Zoning of this property. The City's future land use map designation is consistent with the proposed development. 4. Section 1702.2.3 Developmental Impact Study. a. A traffic analysis shall be submitted for an area within approximately 1/4 mile of the site, or an area including the major intersections to be impacted on the site, whichever is larger. The Traffic Impact Analysis is included under Tab 2, Article III. b. Economic impact data shall be provided, including estimates for construction costs, construction employment, and permanent employment and shall demonstrate that the proposed development is favorable to the economy, public services, environment and housing supply of the City. The Economic Impact Study is included under Tab 4, Article III. C. A housing impact assessment. N/A d. A description of proposed energy conservation measures shall be provided, including only those measures that are proposed in addition to the minimum requirements in State Energy Code. Architecturally, the building envelope will be comprised of insulated walls and roof. Energy saving lamps, ballast and fixtures are being considered at cores and public spaces. The ultimate design of the building will incorporate energy conservation measures when applicable. e. Historic buildings. There are no historic structures located on the Property. 0 bbp.ques f. Environmental zone. The Property is not located within an Environmental Preservation District. g. Dade County Shoreline Development Review. The applicant has, or will, file an Application for Dade County Shoreline Development Review. 10 k I r AMERICAN AIRLINES ARENA V, OR KA Article III Supporting DocumertW it 4 0 q- AMERICAN AIRLINES ARENA ''� 1. Suryey of Property mmm TREE ! DIAMETER WN' SOIL BORING PAW a DIAMETER *tr SANITARY LINE -S- CATCH BASIN ❑cs WATER LINE -W- DRAINAGE MM ❑ 0 FORCE MAIN -PIM- WATER METER oft ELECTRIC LINE - E - MAL BON ❑ Will ELECTRIC OVEbEAD LINE -OHw- ELECIIBC BOX on TELEPHONE LINE -T- UTIftY POLE -0- GAS LINE -G- LOW POLE 4 FINE PROTECTION -F- UTILITY POLE NORM LIGHT RAILROAD TRACKS --h--h--� FiRE HYDR ANr WOW FENCE -N- SAWARY MANHOLE Oaw CHAIN LNat FENCE -K- STORM MMW*KU O flow EASEMENT LINE E1m=w MANN= Ono PI110118 Y LIE � TEU03MO/E MANHOLE O 1w CENTER LINE WATER MAMOLE O were RIGHT OF WAY WI VALVE O v NOT TO SCALE WTS WATER VALVE • w SIGN POST SP GAS VALVE • a am Bit SEWER NAUWE • sr MOM LNIN FENCE OLF AN REEASE VALVE 0 Ash, ELEWJM ELEV. FOND MAIL. FIN BORON Wr. SET NAL a Doc SID CONCHM COI/C FOUND DRILL HOLE FDH CONCRETE BLOCK STRUCTURE CBS CUIB AND GUTTER C&C SDEpALK sm EDGE OF PAVEMENT EOP FOLIO 111110011 PIPE FP FOUND NAL k DEC. FWD rM 1 - WARM SHMN HERE IF ANY ARE BASED ON AN ASSUMED MERIDMM. CDOOtIE OF ME BM STREET - N A 5r 4r W OORIDBMiIS IF AW SHOWN ARE SAM ON AN ARBITRARY COORDINATE SYSTEM 2.- ELESURM SIOMI ARE W= ON NAV.D. 19Z9 DATUM BENCH MARK 6 MN CO POT lNCCH MAW No, R-2311, ELEVATION -L91 ADENTIMMIL SITE GAN1101016 ARE WORN ON THE Ey WIRONNC WINNING I- LOGiOk. Star AND EILTENT OF S AKWACE UTILITIES IS SHOWN A6 PER RDOA PLAW AM ANWACE OMMMWMMK ACCURACY AND COMPLETENESS OF SAp PLANS E NOT GUAMtRM FOR ANY DICOAM S IN THIN! AWA PLE4W CALL UNCLE AT 1-wo-e3Y4770. 4.- THIS FIRM HAS Wr ATTEMPTED TO LOCATE FOOTERS S.- UILOB QiilRIBBE I THIS FM HAS NOT DONE ANY OETE"MIMTION. OF PR DPWY UK AND/OR E48DMM PROM" LIE IN MWION WOW HEREON WERE TAIM FROM A BOUNDWY SUNNY BY MAIULY a ASSOCWES, DATED 06/2B/97 6.- THIS SURVtY MIA6 DONE FOR THE SP CIFiC PURPOSE OF AREIM DESIGN 7.- THE SURM S NOT VALID UNLESS SIGNED AND SEALED BY A FLORIDA REGISTERED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER 8.- FLOOD ZONE AE 9-- FLOOD WOORMMTION: COMM N IY NIL: 120M PAtlL He- 191 0 GF6Wt 1/20/93 BASE E2101mw Liao (No*) IHEREBY CERIIY 7W THE SURVEY REPRESENTED HEREON MEETS THE hOAMUM TECHNICAL SM MUDS SET FORTH BY THE BOARD OF LAND SURVEYORS PURSUANT TO SECTION 47LO27, FLORIDA STATUTES. Surveyor Na 5163 ShrrvsyW4 susinw me 6569 roe roc 07114 reheat OWN& cur: on KY.. 1gNq/er h aEarm arc - i MILL /q/Me/wr 91Qr rho: eCAlt 1 OF //� L 1'. $a WWAM HEAT DATE Or FIELD WORK 10/0'/9' THE PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION A tract of land in Section 37. Townships 53 and 54 South. Range 41 East, in Section 31, Township 53 South. Range 42 East and Section 6, Township 54 South, Range 41 East, sad tract of land lying, situate and be" In the City of biro nL Dods County, Florida, being mom particularly deserted as follows at the point of Intersection of the Easterly extension of the Conterilne of 3rd Street (nor known as N.E. 9th Street) an shown an the plat of A. L KNOWLTON'S MAP OF MBAM L omwdYhg to the plat thereof regarded in plot Book ' 9 ' at page 41 of the Public ill -, I of Dade County. Flarlds. with the Fuel ly right of way boundary of BSCAYW BOULEVARD, sod Easterly right of way boundary of BISCAYW BOULEVARD bakrg POV" and 53 foot Easterly of. as measured at right anglss to. theEostarl of way boundary of BISCAYIE ORrK as sill- an add A.L. Ia4pWNTON'S MAP OF hOM; thence eon South 00. OW 29' West do m sod Eo~y rigryoun right of wboundary of Bic-) 011-1 -r I a din- , of 3�&W feet to the point of Intersection with a Nne lying 6.45 fast North of and p - al with the Eaterly prolongation of the North right of way Boundary of Ill Street (now W -a as N.E. 6th Street) on shown an said plat of A.L. P OK70 6 MAP OF MIAMI, add point of intersection also being the PONT OF BEVANNG of the parcel of Nand he sinaRNr d..arlb.d thrnee run South B6' 57' 43' Eoot along said lire lying 6.25 foot North of and parallel with the Ealtaly ; ml, made of the Mardi right of way bou n nary of 4th Street (now known as NE Bth Street). a dMwfanoe of 1110131111.30 lost to a point I 315.29 fe Westerlyof . ae rrNuinue d of tight angles tee do BULKHEAD UE as slims et at R N10 PLAT OF SHEET 3 - METROPOLITAN DADE CMNW. FLO DA BULKHEAD U E - PART THAEE aeoar I to the, plot thweef as ueepfded in Plat Beak 74 at page /B of the Public Rsoondw of Dab County Florist them run, perpsndedar to the Idrt des irl ed aarst SarM 00' 42' 17' WW far a detorsw of 610.94 feet to a Pell, sW point low 135-91 fost North A a. nsso, , at rqht angles la n as Nthe EE y6M�) was eI - ayiW*plat afA.L IO&T0W$ DMAPPOF (now MIAMI: thence no South W 40r 53' West a dslonw of 22MM first to a point of de6eeBsh; Merhaw run South Or 21Y 40' West a Wioros of 190.S7 twat to a Twint of dsMstlalC these- run Seth W OW 21r West a dbb a of 208 I feat to a point of dwesegss, =M pall of dweedtion dw to be known, • PANT ' A ' for purposes of Ads dwereptisn: tlhehat run South 01' 57' 30' Wit a dilenas of 208 21111 fast to the point of curvature of a circular curve to the right: Nhernee no Wlewiafy ad --- ---strfy am" the arc of sad circular curve to the r4K having a reds of 55.Oo feet tlwvs% a29' antral angle of 76' 21' 01', for an we dstomm of 73.28 tat "Raps run Narth 21' 41 want. tangent to the lost- dssabed cove, a distance at 204.95 feet to a point of deneelion; thence run North 116' 2D' 23' Want a di.twhe. of 1131111.23 fast to the paint of Intwonation with the Easterly right of way boundary of BISCAYIE BOIAEVAIO, add Easterly right of way boundary of BISCAVIE BOIN EVAtD babe parallel with and 53 fast USCAYIE MANE, odd font eigat ht ddowcr/d owrangles, to, do E� n d the No thei� boundary .r� of say bwday of PORT BOULEVARD a flee , I I Is ORleld Reoardw Book 13LAO right at page 107E of Who Public Records of Dads Contyt Florida[ thence run No ti !)1' 57' 43' Mist, chug add Eastrly, right of way boundary of BiSCAYWE BOULEVARD. a detams of 161.96 feet to a point of ' I ti, tbaroe run North W OW 29' East, along said Eawtrty right of boundary of BLSCAYWE NtLEVARD. a dMetdnoe of 56.E feet to am PAR OF eo6I6NME togW. with d Apwfwn rights appertaining tkoreto and Uw#w wO all a ietkho eeawaYs. bulkheads, decks, fM and upland irpravenento extending hem the aI, old pi *W Ea~y into Blood" M% LESS AND pmer, mr, THEREFROM the fallowbg donated 30 foot wide tract of Land IyyyYYYYggg. 1500 feet an each ddsi of the c riterthe of the Florida East Coast RWway to add Trodbbo411rdnq 231ffaast� p off the rDodge I In I ids, anted being inchading Opaaril�y dssatod a fo", - COMMDKE at the -11, ad dssa1 1 point 'A'; thwna run South M' 57' 30' West akog the Northerly right of Ray bondwy of said PORT BOULEVARD, for a dioia.ce of 1.95 test to the point of intersection with a Nne that be p- 11 1 with and i5.W feet Nerdisart rly of. an measured at r1yht angles te, the center" of sold Raiway's Spur Tract No and d the POINT OF BEC6PO of the pwaei of land horekhaftr ,e VA d; thence run North 70' 511' 03' Wear, deng the RM that Is parallel wRi and 15.00 fat No thedstaly of. as measured at PrWAt enga 1110. the conte line of sold Ralwoy's Spur Tract No. IM, a dirtanes of 2ML38 fort to the pent of curvature of a circular curve to the left; them Wwtwty cap the are of said circular curve to the left havir4 a radius of SOL31 fset, through a ow III angle of 02' 2? 03-V. for an are distance of 21.07 feet to the point of Intersection with the Narthewtarly right of way boundary of add PORT BOULEVARD. add paint of intosectle bearing North 16' 3B' 53.5' East iron the center of said curve thlsrros run South 21' 41' 26' East along said Nar0w~y right of way bo rdsey of PORT BOUEVARO. o distance of 30.01 feat to the point of Intersection with a Mine that Is MOD fat SathweaWy of. a meawred at right to. the centerline of said Ralwsyis Spur Tract Ne. i81; thence run South 70' SB' 03 a" the loot deserted Iin, a N 1, ,s of 23L49 feet to the point of Intersection with the right of way boundary, of said PORT BOULEVARD; thence run North 61' 57' 30` East long the No tiro y right of way boundary of sod PORT BOULEVARD. o distance of 65.91 feet to the POINT OF BEGIMNING. Containing 14.63 ogrw more or low PU1104DW Su�hrY��nr" HIAM HMT gee a li BISCAYNE BOULEVARD AT NE 7N STREET MIAMI, FLORIDA lI�rON Bo a a SURVDIK K [ 12M Ill. 133M Cewt, !Wb 212 - M K NMAn A1116 iL Tel: (306) M-INN (DAM . (014) 4M-2626 (WMAIC rac (303) 232-402 N r-1)o M —.— ow ♦/MALT MOi r i� e>f� / PW or tltitl m OP \ / LM Mr .3w WIM TRACT \, Pat WM 7RA01 NO 1M AwtKr rAOle \ � / nr Xe�rt Loire DETAIL "A" +s e r1e. Xar.oea +bXnVo� 2KA r•as GRASS jtASS ss ba b•• by by 'F'" 1 !. s r � a f�, ,�►1 �Ibb} b ,y !, .7l2 4 a`A ss s:o . ^0 ! ,1P , �P , �! , i , Jt , } , ,a bap bap b}— �) :ONO, sr =011C 3st"s ' 10 4 , p'L , .:X> —�. e► . y s?� b`� yp! s!� s. s. ,p . to,�,+ , r ba 6,1 b� y� . X► b� , J , 1! , ba* ot lit A fl.� b� •� b� br lip , i �� b� '0PONe 14 s ► SASS b OX� SITE "A" CNC �I t m bt► bo;• ,ap � b} ,!�' ,� .P' by .1' .�' �' � � � ,S e! �' �► � ,�' � ,. ,?L b+ * Z u ASPttKT „»ate ¢ VASS�.��..� M Fr. M 14A3 A eft AST Sl TE "B' Tm d `\ �t• ,r ��aa��,,,..� e✓r b ,ie ,?! Jp sP b,' Vs� ya► s� si, s* s'y "� Ii�T A�PARf �• 1 b♦ so op lip 10 1y �� 1 : � � � __ � ,� �, , r �� ,fit ►.r..�..� '_� ir Ira- 1I IMAM HEAT DATE OF FIELD WORK; 10/01/97 e GUAM CL C PDWPOW SURWV TRAM HEAT A IMM M I BISCAYNE BOULEVARD AT NE 77H STREET MM. PLORIOA 'AKI son=" t smem W. 12300 TO (305) M- �( � (tom) �uee�( e> Fee (700 t32-eSt2 I 7 0 AMERICAN AIRLINES ARENA i ' 2. Traffic Impact Study It . rr- HM44�111r4z Pm4 Au4o*4 TA& 5"y October 1997 Prepared by: David Plummer & Associates Maritime Park Arena Traffic Study TABLE OF CONTENTS Traffic Study ............................................... Exhibit A-1 Transportation Management Plan Outline ......................... Exhibit A-2 Development Strategies which Promote Linkages between the Project and the Downtown/Southeast Overtown Park West Community ........ Exhibit A-3 } } log \\�} 011 D R� me - ` r>.)! 'it\ Exhibit A-1 Downtown DRI Maritime Park Arena Traffic Study TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................. ES-1 1.0 INTRODUCTION....................................................... 1 1.1 Project Background.................................................... 1 1.2 Study Area and Methodology ............................................ 3 1.3 Study Objective....................................................... 3 2.0 EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS ........................................ 4 2.1 Data Collection....................................................... 4 2.1.1 Roadway Characteristics ........................................... 4 2.1.2 Traffic Counts ................................................... 5 2.1.3 Intersection Data ................................................. 7 2.2 Intersection Capacity Analysis ............................................ 7 3.0 PLANNED AND PROGRAMMED ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS .............. 9 3.1 Programmed Roadway Improvements ...................................... 9 3.2 Planned Roadway Improvements .......................................... 9 4.0 FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS ........................................ 11 4.1 Committed Developments .............................................. 11 4.2 Project Traffic....................................................... 12 4.2.1 Project Trip Generation ........................................... 12 4.2.2 Project Trip Assignment .......................................... 14 4.3 Future Traffic Conditions with Project ..................................... 16 5.0 SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS ........................................... 18 5.1 Special Events Transportation Management Plan ............................. 18 5.2 Strategies promoting linkages to Downtown/Overtown Park West ............... 18 6.0 CONCLUSIONS........................................................ 19 LIST OF EXHIBITS ExhibitI- Location Map ........................................................ 2 Exhibit 2 - Existing (1997) Traffic Volumes .......................................... 6 Exhibit 3 - Existing (1997) Intersection Lane Configuration and LOS ...................... 8 Exhibit 4 - Committed Roadway Improvements ....................................... 9 Exhibit 5 - Performing Arts Center PM Peak Hour Trip Generation ....................... 11 Exhibit 6 - Cardinal Distribution for TAZs 612 and 613................................ 12 Exhibit 7 - Future (1999) Traffic Volumes without Project ............................. 13 Exhibit 8 - Project Trip Generation ............................................... 14 Exhibit 9 - Cardinal Distribution for TAZ 615....................................... 14 Exhibit 10 - PM Peak Hour Project Trip Assignment ................................. 15 Exhibit 11 - Future (1999) Traffic Volumes with Project and Roadway LOS ................ 17 APPENDICES Appendix A - Traffic Study Methodology Appendix B - Turning Movement Counts Appendix C - Intersection Sketches Appendix D - Intersection Capacity Analysis Worksheets EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The proposed Maritime Park Arena is a major multi -use entertainment facility to be located on the "FEC" site abutting Biscayne Bay in Downtown Miami, Florida. The proposed development consists of a 24,000 seat arena, 37,500 square feet of office use and 40,000 square feet of retail use. Potentially, all of the retail will be open to the general public on a daily basis. The site will contain approximately 1,200 parking spaces in the lower levels of the Arena. Access to the project garage will be provided through Port Boulevard and the extension of NE 8 Street east of Biscayne Boulevard. The proposed arena is anticipated to begin operations for the 1999-2000 NBA Basketball season. For purposes of this study, future traffic conditions will depict 1999 conditions. In the early 1980's, the City of Miami prepared an areawide Application for Development Approval (ADA) that would give the City jurisdiction over the approval of any development within the downtown area. The document is referred as the Downtown Miami Areawide DRI. The Development Order (DO) issued allowed the City to approve both local and regional size projects. Approvals for the Maritime Park Arena are being sought under the Downtown Miami Areawide DRI. An assessment of the pm peak hour traffic associated with the Maritime Park Arena has been performed and is set forth herein. Adequate roadway capacity during the pm peak hour is available to accommodate the proposed project trips. Analysis of future (1999) traffic conditions with the project during pm peak hours shows that, except for the intersection of Biscayne Boulevard/NE 8 Street, the Downtown Miami Areawide DRI's adopted Level of Service E standard will not be exceeded. With the existing intersection configuration (unsignalized), it is anticipated that delays will be experienced for the minor street (NE 8 Street). It is recommended that the intersection of Biscayne Boulevard/NE 8 Street be signalized to improve operations for existing and future conditions. However, the approval process established by Florida's Department of Transportation for a new signal requires that the signal meet the warrants described in the Manual on Uniform Traffic Studies (MUTCD). A signal warrant study will be prepared as part of the permitting phase of the project. Maritime Park Arena Traffic Study ES- t In addition to the requirements set forth by the Downtown Miami Areawide DRI, a Transportation Management Plan is presented as part of the traffic study as Exhibit A-2. This is intended as an outline listing potential alternatives/strategies that may be considered in the ultimate plan in order to ensure a safe and efficient means of accommodating the traffic generated during special events. As requested by various agencies, the traffic study also contains a section on the development of strategies which promote linkages between the project and the Downtown/Southeast Overtown Park West Community (See Exhibit A-3). This section explores pedestrian linkages, as well as other modes such as transit, shuttles and water taxis. Maritime Park Arena Traffic Study ES-2 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Project Background The proposed Maritime Park Arena is a major multi -use entertainment facility to be located on the "FEC" site abutting Biscayne Bay in Downtown Miami, Florida. The site, shown in Exhibit 1, is located on the northeast quadrant of Biscayne Boulevard (US 1/SR 5) and Port Boulevard (SR 886). The proposed development consists of a 24,000 seat arena, 37,500 square feet of office use (7,500 square feet for the Arena management office, and 30,000 square feet for the Miami Heat franchise and other sport related offices) and 40,000 square feet of retail use (30,000 square feet will be located outside the ticket secure area of the main arena building, and 10,000 square feet inside the arena). Potentially, all of the retail will be open to the general public on a daily basis. For purposes of this study, the retail will be treated as retail development in the downtown area (i.e. the trip generation for retail will be used). The site will contain approximately 1,200 parking spaces in the lower levels of the Arena. Access to the project garage will be provided through Port Boulevard and the extension of NE 8 Street east of Biscayne Boulevard. The proposed arena is anticipated to begin operations for the 1999-2000 NBA Basketball season. For purposes of this study, future traffic conditions will depict 1999 conditions. In the early 1980's the City of Miami prepared an areawide Application for Development Approval (ADA) that would give them jurisdiction over the approval of any development within the downtown area. The document is referred as the Downtown Miami Areawide DRI. The intent of this process was to measure the regional impacts from estimated growth in this area. The Development Order (DO) issued allowed the City to approve both local and regional size projects as long as the developer conformed with any mitigation requirements. The DO also requires the developer to use the pm peak hour volumes to establish localized impacts. The developer will be required to pay the mitigation fee for the regional impacts and to construct any close -by improvement needed to mitigate localized impacts. The proposed Maritime Park Arena project will comply with the Downtown Miami Areawide DRI process without additional mitigation measures. Maritime Park Arena Traffic Study -�` 1ns►i1q., NONE. 1.2 Study Area and Methodology The scope and methodology for this study is based on the methodology of the previously approved Downtown Miami Arewide DRI. The methodology has been discussed with various agencies including the City of Miami, the South Florida Regional Planning Council, the Downtown Development Authority and the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT). A copy of the agreed upon methodology is presented in Appendix A. Consistent with the Downtown Miami Areawide DRI, the traffic study has been performed for pm peak hour conditions. Intersections capacity analysis has been performed for the following intersections: • Biscayne Boulevard/I-395 ramps/NE 13 Street, • Biscayne Boulevard/I-395 ramps/NE 11 Terrace, • NE 8 Street/Biscayne Boulevard, • NE 6 Street/Biscayne Boulevard, and • NE 5 Street/Biscayne Boulevard. 1.3 Study Objective Approvals for this project are sought under the development order issued to the Downtown Miami DRI. The objective of this traffic study is to assess if there are localized pm peak hour impacts in addition to those identified in the Downtown Miami DRI as a result of this project. Maritime Park Arena Traffic Study 3 2.0 EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS 2.1 Data Collection Data collection for this study included roadway characteristics, intersection data, vehicle classification traffic counts, pedestrian counts, signal timing, accident data, and seasonal factors. The data collection effort is described in detail in the following sections. 2.1.1 Roadway Characteristics Biscayne Boulevard south of NE 5 Street Biscayne Boulevard south of NE 5 Street is an eight lane, divided arterial roadway with sidewalks on both sides of the street. The median has surface parking areas. In some areas, it is straddled by the overhead Metromover line. Due to the widths of these median areas, the median openings are under traffic control at street intersections. Pedestrian amenities include sidewalks varying in width between 10' and 15', striped or paved pedestrian crosswalks, and pedestrian phases and buttons at all traffic lights. The posted speed limit on this facility along this area is 30 miles per hour (mph). On -street parking is only permitted in the median in this area of Biscayne Boulevard. Biscayne Boulevard between NE 5 Street and NE 13 Street Biscayne Boulevard narrows between NE 5 Street and NE 6 Street. It becomes a six lane divided facility north of NE 6 Street. The sidewalks width ranges between 6' and 12'. Portions of sidewalk on the east side of the road are missing altogether. The median becomes a raised concrete median north of NE 6 Street, and then a painted median north of NE 7 Street. On -street parking in not permitted along this section of roadway. The posted speed limit is 30 mph in this section of roadway. Biscayne Boulevard north of NE 13 Street Biscayne Boulevard becomes a four -lane facility north of NE 13 Street. The roadway becomes undivided at this point. However, a turn lane is provided in the center of the road. On -street parking continues to be prohibited. The posted speed limit is 30 mph. Maritime Park Arena Traffic Study 4 NE 5 Street NE 5 Street is a 3-lane one-way eastbound roadway with a posted speed limit of 30 mph. Metromover runs parallel to NE 5 Street from NW 1 Avenue to Biscayne Boulevard. On -street parking is not permitted along NE 5 Street east of NW 1 Avenue. On -street parallel parking is permitted on both sides of the street west of NW 1 Avenue. NE 6 Street NE 6 Street is a 3-lane one-way westbound roadway. The posted speed limit is 30 mph. On -street parking is not permitted between Biscayne Boulevard and NE 1 Avenue. On -street parallel parking is permitted on both sides of the street west of NW 1 Avenue. Port Boulevard NE 5 Street and NE 6 Street act as a one-way pair merging into Port Boulevard and providing direct access into the Port of Miami. Port Boulevard is a six lane divided causeway with a high span bridge, which provides access from mainland Downtown Miami to the Port of Miami (Dodge Island). The posted speed limit is 40 mph. Parking is not permitted along the road. NE 8 Street NE 8 Street is a two-way, 2-lane, undivided roadway. Parallel parking is permitted on a parking lane along both sides of the road. The posted speed limit is 30 mph. The intersection of NE 8 Street/Biscayne Boulevard is unsignalized, controlled by a stop sign. 2.1.2 Traffic Counts As agreed upon with planning staff from the City of Miami, peak hour vehicle turning movement counts were collected at the intersections under study. Seasonal adjustment factors were obtained from the FDOT. A seasonal volume adjustment factor of 1.01 (for 1996 Dade Countywide) corresponding to the date of the counts was used to adjust the raw traffic counts to a typical weekday traffic count. Appendix B provides summaries of traffic volumes and peak hour calculations for the locations counted for this study. Exhibit 2 shows the seasonally adjusted 1997 pm peak hour traffic volumes at the intersections under study. Maritime Park Arena Traffic Study 5 PRECISE AUCNMENT Of THE ROADWAYS. EXHIBIT p � MARITIME PARK ARENA EXISTING (1997) INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES 2.1.3 Intersection Data A field survey was conducted to determine the lane configurations at the roadways and intersections under study. Existing signal timing data was obtained from Dade County for the intersections under study. This information provided the signal phasing and timing used in the intersection capacity analysis. Exhibit 3 shows the existing lane configurations, and the resulting levels of service (LOS) for existing pm peak hour conditions. More detailed sketches of the intersections under study are provided in Appendix C. 2.2 Intersection Capacity Analysis Intersection capacity analysis was performed using the Highway Capacity Software (HCS), based on procedures of the 1994 Highway Capacity Manual. Exhibit 3 shows the resulting LOS for existing conditions at the intersections under study (see Appendix D for worksheets). The eastbound approach of the intersection of Biscayne Boulevard/NE 8 Street will experience delays with the existing lane configurations and traffic control (un-signalized). All other intersections currently operate at acceptable LOS. Maritime Park Arena Traffic Study 7 NE13ST NE8ST NE6ST NE5ST NOTES: I. THIS ILLUSTRATION IS A DIAGRAM THAT DOES NOT REFLECT THE PRECISE ALIGNMENT OF THE ROADWAYS. * DELAYS ARE EXPERIENCED BY MINOR STREET (NE 8 ST) WITH > EXISTING LANE AND SIGNAL CONFIGURATION (UNSIGNALIZED). s �J N.T.S. t t NE II TER 0 m LEGEND W 00 TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUME y — 00 THROUGH LANE m OINTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE MARITIME PARK ARENA B V BAYSIDE EXHIBIT EXISTING (1997) INTERSECTION pMARITIME PARK ARENA LANE CONFIGURATION AND 1 LEVEL OF SERVICE 3.0 PLANNED AND PROGRAMMED ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS 3.1 Programmed Roadway Improvements Dade County's 1998 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) was reviewed to determine if any roadway in the vicinity of this project are programmed for improvement. Exhibit 4 shows the programmed roadways improvements in this area. Exhibit 4 - Committed Roadway Improvements Roadway Improvement Timing and Type of Work Port Boulevard ITS Information System 1997/1998 Design Biscayne Blvd To Dodge Island 1997/1998 Construction I-395/SR 836/1-95 Corridor Improvement 2000/2001 Design NW 17 Av to McArthur Cswy. 3.2 Planned Roadway Improvements Planned (unfunded) improvements in the area include the widening of Biscayne Boulevard north of NE 5 Street. This improvement will include widening of the sidewalks and median as well as beautification of the sidewalks. At this time, this is a conceptual improvement; plans have not been completed. The Downtown Development Authority (DDA) has been considering the creation of a Downtown Circulation Loop (DCL). The objective is to improve traffic flow in the downtown area by diverting traffic to an arterial loop; this will ensure that any downtown area origin or destination is within a few blocks of an arterial. The DCL would serve as a system that provides improved access between 1-95 and the downtown land uses. It will also allow vehicles to circulate around downtown while avoiding streets which have high pedestrian usage. Different alternatives have been studied in the past. However, there is no definite plan for the ultimate DCL. Maritime Park Arena Traffic Study 9 The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) has been studying improvements to I-395. However, in order to accommodate the proposed Maritime Park Arena and Performing Arts Center, FDOT has suspended completion of the preliminary engineering of the improvements to I-395. They will reactivate those studies, and will adjust them for the revised traffic demands, including special event requirements, as soon as both projects are defined. Completion of the construction of the I-395 improvements will occur after completion of the Arena. For purposes of this study, these improvements have not been accounted for. Maritime Park Arena Traffic Study 10 4.0 FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS 4.1 Committed Developments It was agreed upon with the reviewing agencies that traffic generated by the proposed Performing Arts Center should be considered in this study. This complex will consist of a 2,400 seat Ballet/Opera House, a 2,200 seat Concert Hall and a 450 seat Studio Theater. It will be located east and west of Biscayne Boulevard between NE 13 Street and NE 14 Street. Investigation of committed developments, verified with City of Miami staff, did not reveal imminent developments in the area. A 2% growth factor was added to existing traffic volumes to account for any development that may occur within the study period. Trip generation for the Performing Arts Center was estimated using the table titled Land Use Exchange Rates for Downtown Miami DRI. This table was obtained in Attachment D-2: Downtown Miami DRI Facilities Trip Generation Analysis in the Notification of Proposed Change (NOPC) to the Downtown Miami DRI, submitted to the South Florida Regional Planning Council in September, 1994. This table showing the rates used for purposes of this study is provided in Appendix E. It is widely recognized that these rates are "Urban Environment Trip Generation Rates" reflecting conditions during the pm peak hour of the roadway system in Downtown Miami (afternoon "rush hour"). These rates are not intended to reflect traffic generation during a special event, but rather during the worst time of a typical weekday. During those times the Performing Arts Center traffic generation is primarily administrative and maintenance personnel only. Exhibit 5 shows pm peak hour trip generation for this project, along with the proposed land uses. Exhibit 5 - Performing Arts Center PM Peak Hour Trip Generation Project Name & Address Land Use Designation Number of Units PM Peak Hour Vehicle Trips Performing Arts Center Attraction/ 5,050 Seats 10 Biscayne Blvd/NE 13 St Recreation Maritime Park Arena Traffic Study 1 Traffic generated by this development was distributed and assigned to the study area using the Cardinal Distribution for Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZ) 612 and 613, shown in Exhibit 6. The Cardinal Distribution gives a generalized distribution of trips from a TAZ to other parts of Dade County. For estimating trip distribution for the committed project, consideration was given to conditions such as the roadway network accessed by the project, roadways available to travel in the desired direction, and attractiveness of traveling on a specific roadway. Exhibit 6 - Cardinal Distribution (TAZs 612 & 613) Cardinal Direction Distribution (TAZ 612) Distribution (TAZ 613) NNE 12.39% 10.84% ENE 4.42% 3.88% ESE 4.84% 4.10% SSE 6.92% 1.38% SSW 16.45% 17.35% WSW 20.10% 24.48% WNW 16.40% 16.48% NNW 18.48% 21.49% Total 100 % 100 % Future traffic volumes prior to the proposed Maritime Park Arena were projected for the buildout year 1999-2000. Future (1999) turning movement volumes without the project projected for the intersections under study are shown in Exhibit 7. 4.2 Project Traffic 4.2.1 Project Trip Generation Trip generation for the project was estimated using the rates published in Attachment D-2: Downtown Miami DRI Facilities Trip Generation Analysis if the Notification of Proposed Change (NOPC) to the Downtown Miami DRI, submitted to the South Florida Regional Planning Council in September, 1994. This table showing the rates used for purposes of this study, is provided in Appendix E. It is widely recognized that these rates are "Urban Environment Trip Generation Rates" reflecting conditions during the pm peak hour of the roadway system in Downtown Miami (afternoon "rush hour"). The rates are not intended to reflect traffic generation during a special event, but rather during the worst time of a Maritime Park Arena Traffic Study 12 NE13ST NE8ST NE6ST NE5ST L-120 o-175 j 1 f-388 `l O N `O O �t NE 11 TER 656 - -j jj t fo' 57 o r- v N.T.S. m LEGEND W 00 TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUME �Q —00 THROUGH MOVEMENT VOLUME m 43—j � M CV MARITIME (PARK ARENA o 1---395 -440 152 Lo 230-J f r 98 — - -o 111� v NOTES; oBAYSI D E I. THIS ILLUSTRATION IS A DIAGRAM THAT DOES NOT REFLECT THE PRECISE ALIGNMENT OF THE ROADWAYS. 0 0 EXHIBIT w p � MARITIME PARK ARENA FUTURE (1999) TRAFFIC CONDITIONS WITHOUT PROJECT 13 typical weekday. During those times the proposed Arena's traffic generation is primarily administrative and maintenance personnel only. Trip generation for the project is shown in Exhibit 8. Exhibit 8 - Maritime Park Arena Trip Generation (PM Peak Hour) Maritime Park Arena Land Use Designation Number of Units PM Peak Hour Vehicle Trips Attraction/Recreation 24,000 Seats 49 Office 37,500 Square Feet 22 Retail 40,000 Square Feet 21 TOTAL 92 4.2.2 Project Trip Assignment Project traffic was distributed and assigned to the study area using the Cardinal Distribution for TAZ 615 shown in Exhibit 9. The Cardinal Distribution gives a generalized distribution of trips from a TAZ to other parts of Dade County. For estimating trip distribution for the project location, consideration was given to conditions such as the roadway network accessed by the project, roadways available to travel in the desired direction, and attractiveness of traveling on a specific roadway. Exhibit 10 shows the project trip assignment to the impacted roadway segments and intersections. Exhibit 9 - Cardinal Distribution (TAZ 615) Cardinal Direction Distribution NNE 12.97% ENE 3.24% ESE 1.62% SSE 0.54% SSW 19.46% WSW 28.65% WNW 8.65% NNW 24.86% Total 100 % Maritime Park Arena Traffic Study 14 PRECISE ALIGNMENT OF THE ROADWAYS. EXHIBIT MARITIME PARK ARENA PROJECT TRAFFIC 10 4.3 Future Traffic Conditions with Project Using the trip assignments from the previous sections, the project trips, background growth and committed development trips were combined with the adjusted 1997 existing traffic to get the total 1999 traffic on the impacted roadway segments. Exhibit 11 shows the total pm peak hour turning movement volumes, along with the resulting roadway LOS with the project, at all the intersections under study. Intersection capacity analysis worksheets are provided in Appendix C. It is anticipated that with the existing intersection configuration (unsignalized), delays will be experienced by traffic to and from NE 8 Street at the intersection of Biscayne Boulevard/NE 8 Street. It is recommended that this intersection be signalized in order to improve operations for existing as well as future conditions. Signalization of this intersection will not only improve pm peak hour level of service, but will also facilitate traffic control during higher volume conditions, such as special events. However, the approval process established by Florida's Department of Transportation for a new signal requires that the signal meet the warrants described in the Manual on Uniform Traffic Studies (MUTCD). A signal warrant study will be prepared as part of the permitting phase of the project. Intersection capacity analysis for these intersections was performed with the recommended signal in place (worksheets are also provided in Appendix Q. The analysis shows the intersection operating at LOS A with this improvement. All other intersections are projected to operated within the LOS E standard established in the Downtown Miami Areawide DRI. Maritime Park Arena Traffic Study 16 0 0 0 �-120 N cN ---175 f-391 N.T.S. NE 13 ST B `1 f ON.� o NE 11 TER 656 64� �. c 5 m LEGEND W Q L00 TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUME U —00 THROUGH MOVEMENT VOLUME m O O INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE c NM L29 NE8ST 2 43—J l' r I o- co N �N 12� MARITIME PARK AREN � o t-398 NE 6 ST �::460 —161 B N O" of N NE5ST 231—J f r 107— c q o'. NOTES: BAYS I D E I. THIS ILLUSTRATION IS A DIAGRAM THAT DOES NOT REFLECT THE PRECISE ALIGNMENT OF THE ROADWAYS. WITH RECOMENDED SIGNALIZATION EXHIBIT p MARITIME PARK ARENA FUTURE (1999) TRAFFIC 1 CONDITIONS WITH PROJECT �� 5.0 SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS 5.1 Special Events Transportation Management Plan Because of the nature of this project, it is anticipated that large traffic volumes will be generated during special events, while modest demands will be the norm during other hours of operation. Generally, special events occur during off-peak hours. This is an ideal situation because there is excess roadway capacity available during off-peak hours. However, it is also recognized that a Special Events Transportation Management Plan needs to be developed to ensure a safe and efficient means of accommodating the traffic generated during special events. Although this plan needs to be studied and developed in more detail, an outline has been provided as part of this submittal as Exhibit A-2. This outline lists potential alternatives/strategies that may be considered in the Special Events Transportation Management Plan. 5.2 Strategies promoting linkages to Downtown/Overtown Park West Since parking will be limited at the proposed site, pedestrian access will be critical to the success of the proposed Maritime Park Arena. Therefore, project design will emphasize the importance of other modes of transportation. A discussion of possible strategies that can be implemented as part of this project, with the support of the appropriate responsible agencies, is presented in Exhibit A-3 of the traffic study. Maritime Park Arena Traffic Study 18 6.0 CONCLUSIONS An assessment of the pm peak hour traffic associated with the Maritime Park Arena was performed in accordance with the requirements of the Downtown Miami Areawide DRI. If warranted, it is recommended that the intersection of Biscayne Boulevard/NE 8 Street be signalized in order to improve operations for existing as well as future conditions. Analysis of future (1999) traffic conditions with the project during pm peak hours shows that the Downtown Miami Areawide DRI's adopted Level of Service E standard will not be exceeded. Adequate roadway capacity during the pm peak hour is available to accommodate the proposed project trips. The proposed Maritime Park Arena Project will comply with the requirements of the Downtown Miami Areawide DRI without additional regional mitigation measures. Maritime Park Arena Traffic Study 19 APPENDIX A Traffic Impact Study Methodology G) PH TRAFFIC APPROVAL PROCESS MARITIME PARK ARENA (Revised September 3, 1997) Downtown DRI Conditions The Maritime Park Arena is a mixed use project. The Arena will have 24,000 event seats. The same site will have a limited amount of land uses that complement the Arena events but will also be open to the general public. Examples include restaurants, retail, and a Miami Heat theme store. In the early 1980's the City of Miami prepared an area wide Application for Development Approval (ADA) for Developments of Regional Impacts. There were two separate ADA's. The first area is Southeast Overtown/Parkwest. The second was the retail and office center of the City including the areas along Brickell Avenue south of the Miami River and Omni (north of the CBD). Both documents are usually referred to as the Downtown DRI. The intent of the Downtown DRI was to measure the regional impacts from estimated growth in these areas. The Downtown Development Order identified the degree of required transportation improvements to support this growth. The Order then allowed the City to approve both local and regional size projects as long as the developer conformed with the mitigation requirements. The South Florida Regional Planning Council, and the other review agencies, selected the two-way P.M. peak hour as the analysis hour for the DRI. The two way volumes were estimated for the growth and the transportation mitigation to support that growth was set. The City is allowed to permit projects within the DRI area until the level, or threshold, of these estimated peak hour volumes is exceeded. At that time another increment of the Downtown DRI would be completed that establishes new mitigation requirements and new volume thresholds. A-1 The Development Order also requires the developer to use the P.M. peak hour volumes to establish close -by improvements to support their site. The developer will be required to both pay the mitigation rate for the regional impacts and to construct the close -by intersection improvements The Maritime Park Arena will comply with the Downtown DRI process. The P.M. peak hour trips generated by the land uses at the Arena will be estimated and compared to the regional trip allowance in Downtown Miami. Comparisons will be made to the original mix of DRI land uses and simultaneous increases and decreases will be made to the land use list. The nearby intersections will be analyzed in the P.M. peak hour and commitments made to the signalization and turn lane construction that may be required to support these volumes. Arena Process The legal requirements for development of the Arena are satisfied with the completion of the studies noted above. However, the State of Florida, South Florida Regional Planning Council, and the developers recognize that the Arena attracts significant patrons outside of the rush or peak hours. It makes no economical sense, or urban design principals, to construct large transportation improvements to support those limited amounts of off-peak operations. It would be far better to develop a Transportation/Traffic Management master plan to make better utilization of the existing system during those hours. Examples of the elements in this plan would include reversing streets, imbalanced lanes, police control of traffic, satellite parking, and promotion of transit. The Arena, as part of the traffic approval process, proposes the three step technical process described above. The first two steps meet the requirements of the Downtown Development Order. The third item creates comfortable and efficient circulation for the off-peak hour Arena events. 1) PM Peak Hour Trip Generation and Simultaneous Increase/Decrease of Land Uses 2) Adjacent Intersection Level of Service Analysis and Mitigation (PM peak hour) 3) Transportation/Traffic Management Plan A-2 TASK I - SIMULTANEOUS INCREASEIDECREASE IN LAND USES The PM peak hour trips generated by all the land uses in the site will be estimated using the trip generation rates established in the original ADA. It is expected that the retail type uses at the site will be the dominant contributors to the PM peak hour volumes. The Arena contribution during those weekday PM hours will be employees, deliveries, and other limited uses. The two way PM peak hour volumes will then be deducted from the DRI threshold. There will also be simultaneous increases and decreases in the land use list that was part of the original Development Order. TASK 2 - NEARBY INTERSECTION ANALYSIS The PM peak hour capacity analysis at the major intersections and nearby driveways will be completed. For the Arena it will involve the intersections listed below. The analysis will begin with existing PM peak hour volumes, will add other committed projects, then superimpose the Arena volumes on those totals to determine the future level of service at the location. All generation rates will be consistent with the Downtown DRI approvals. The PM peak hour trips generated by the proposed Performing Arts Center will be considered committed traffic. The analysis will identify any intersection mitigation that may be required to maintain acceptable levels of service. Likely examples would include turn lanes and signalization timing. Analysis Intersection Biscayne Boulevard/Interstate 395 NE 8th Street / Biscayne Boulevard NE 6th Street / Biscayne Boulevard NE 5th Street / Biscayne Boulevard A-3 TASK 3 - TRANSPORTATION/ TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PLAN The Transportation Management Plan, which will include the special event traffic operations plan, will be put in place to accommodate the Arena volumes during the off-peak hours. The Plan recognizes that the Arena traffic can be absorbed on the site street system if supported by special operational plans during those hours. The Plan also recognizes the importance of car pooling, available transit, directional signing and the like. Plan Elements 1) Revised geometrics to allow double, with police control, rather than single turn lanes. 2) Reversing lanes to accommodate inbound and then outbound movements. 3) Imbalanced lanes. 4) Police control of signal timing. 5) Expressway directional signs encouraging use of a variety of expressway exits. 6) Internet web sites showing routes and available parking. 7) Car pooling. 8) Promoting multiple stops and using charter buses from restaurants and entertainment spots. The Management Plan will be submitted to the City of Miami. It is possible there will be several different plans depending on the level of event patronage. The Miami Heat sellout, for instance, will have a more comprehensive plan than an event not expected to fill the Arena. The Plan, including the special event traffic operations, become a commitment that would be part of the Arena approval. I-395 The Florida Department of Transportation, in order to accommodate the future plans of the Arena and Performing Arts Center, has suspended completion of the preliminary engineering of the improvements of I-395. They will reactivate those studies, adjusting for the revised traffic demands including special event requirements, as soon as those projects are defined. Completion of the construction of the 1-395 improvements will occur after the completion of the Arena. For this reason the Tasks 2 and 3 described above may have to be completed for the existing I-395 conditions, then adjusted for the proposed improvements on that same facility. 971 17/dsp/ marl t-pk. re p A-4 APPENDIX B Turning Movement Counts 03 DPA 97117 SUMMARY OF PM PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS LOCATION: Biscayne Boulevard/NE 5 Street CITY: Miami COUNTY: Dade DATE: 9/10/97 OBSERVER: DPA REMARKS: TIME NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND GRAND FROM TO L T R Total L T R Total L T R Total L T R Total TOTAL 04:00 PM 04:15 PM - 301 9 310 38 242 - 280 46 35 27 108 - - - - 698 04:15 PM 04:30 PM - 289 9 298 34 226 - 260 50 38 26 114 - - - - 672 04:30 PM 04:45 PM - 343 19 362 27 228 - 255 54 18 28 100 - - - - 717 04:45 PM 05:00 PM - 314 17 331 31 223 - 254 42 22 28 92 - - - - 677 05:00 PM 05:15 PM - 409 10 419 39 239 - 278 57 24 20 101 - - - - 798 05:15 PM 05:30 PM - 438 7 445 38 252 - 290 50 23 39 112 - - - - 847 05:30 PM 05:45 PM - 386 13 399 31 258 - 289 56 16 28 100 - - - - 788 05:45 PM 06:00 PM - 393 16 409 40 215 - 255 56 30 19 105 - - - - 769 PM PEAK HOUR CALCULATIONS Seasonally Adjusted PM Peak Hour Volumes TIME NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND GRAND FROM 7 TO L T R Total L T R Total L T R Total L T R Total TOTAL 05:00 PM 06:00 PM 0 1642 46 1689 149 974 - �1123 221 94 107 422 - - - - 3234 PEAK HOUR FACTOR 0.94 0.96 0.93 NA 0.95 NOTES: A seasonal adjustment factor of 1.01 was used. 09/23/97 BISN E5ST. W K4 W N DPA 97116 SUMMARY OF PM PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS LOCATION: Biscayne Boulevard/NE 6 Street CITY: Miami COUNTY: Dade DATE: 9/10/97 OBSERVER: DPA REMARKS: TIME NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND GRAND FROM TO L T R Total L T R Total L T R Total L T R Total TOTAL 04:00 PM 04:15 PM 15 346 - 361 - 258 6 264 - - - 0 38 90 85 213 838 04:15 PM 04:30 PM 21 323 - 344 - 218 10 228 - - - 0 28 95 86 209 781 04:30 PM 04:45 PM 16 382 - 398 - 228 11 239 - - - 0 22 85 89 196 833 04:45 PM 05:00 PM 18 344 - 362 - 245 12 257 - - - 0 20 115 99 234 853 05:00 PM 05:15 PM 22 447 - 469 - 250 9 259 - - - 0 34 158 111 303 1031 05:15 PM 05:30 PM 20 481 - 501 - 256 12 268 - - - 0 40 81 75 196 965 05:30 PM 05:45 PM 10 430 - 440 - 268 8 276 - - - 0 32 89 108 229 945 05:45 PM 06:00 PM 13 441 - 454 - 221 12 233 - - - 0 39 91 82 212 899 PM PEAK HOUR CALCULATIONS Seasonally Adjusted PM Peak Hour Volumes TIME NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND GRAND FROM TO L I T I R I Total L I T I R I Total L T R Total L T R Total TOTAL 05:00 PM 06:00 PM 66 1817 - 1883 - 1005 41 1046 - - - 0 146 4!3J 380 949 3878 PEAK HOUR FACTOR 0.93 0.94 NA 0.78 0.93 NOTES: A seasonal adjustment factor of 1.01 was used. 09/24/97 BI SN E6ST. W K4 DPA 97117 SUMMARY OF PM PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS LOCATION: Biscayne Boulevard/NE 8 Street CITY: Miami COUNTY: Dade DATE: 9/11/97 OBSERVER:DPA REMARKS: T�IME NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND GRAND FROM TO L T R Total L T R Total L T R Total L T R Total TOTAL 04:00 PM 04:15 PM 16 427 - 443 - 232 9 241 10 - 5 15 - - - - 699 04:15 PM 04:30 PM 13 442 - 455 - 235 8 243 16 - 3 19 - - - - 717 04:30 PM 04:45 PM 14 471 - 485 - 267 7 274 10 - 3 13 - - - - 772 04:45 PM 05:00 PM 15 473 - 488 - 276 12 288 2 - 4 6 - - - - 782 05:00 PM 05:15 PM 17 567 - 584 - 344 16 360 11 - 0 11 - - - - 955 05:15 PM 05:30 PM 19 555 - 574 - 278 13 291 12 - 4 16 - - - - 881 05:30 PM 05:45 PM 14 558 - 572 - 291 5 296 7 - 1 8 - - - - 876 05:45 PM 06:00 PM 15 542 - 557 - 231 7 238 11 - 6 17 - - - - 812 PM PEAK HOUR CALCULATIONS Seasonally Adjusted PM Peak Hour Volumes TIME NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND GRAND FROM TO L T R Total L I T R Total L T R I Total L I T I R Total TOTAL 05:00 PM 06:00 PM 66 2244 - T231 0 F7 1155 41 1197 41 PEAK HOUR FACTOR 0.98 0.82 0.76 NA 0.92 NOTES: A seasonal adjustment factor of 1.01 was used. 09/23/97 BISN EBST. W K4 DPA 97117 SUMMARY OF PM PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS LOCATION: Biscayne Boulevard/1-395/NE 11 Terrace CITY: Miami COUNTY: Dade DATE: 9/11/97 OBSERVER:DPA REMARKS: TIME NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND FROM TO L T R Total L T R Total L T R Total L j!r"4��AND TAL 04:00 PM 04:15 PM - 281 124 405 - 212 - 212 95 - 23 118 - - - - 735 04:15 PM 04:30 PM - 265 135 400 - 219 - 219 105 - 21 126 - - - - 745 04:30 PM 04:45 PM - 291 150 441 - 267 - 267 82 - 10 92 - - - - 800 04:45 PM 05:00 PM - 298 130 428 - 268 - 268 88 - 18 106 - - - - 802 05:00 PM 05:15 PM - 337 141 478 - 315 - 315 98 - 16 114 - - - - 907 05:15 PM 05:30 PM - 354 164 518 - 270 - 270 98 - 16 114 - - - - 902 05:30 PM 05:45 PM - 345 170 515 - 268 - 268 175 - 14 189 - - - - 972 05:45 PM 06:00 PM - 344 160 504 - 237 - 237 253 - 7 260 - - - - 1001 PM PEAK HOUR CALCULATIONS Seasonally Adjusted PM Peak Hour Volumes TIME NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND GRAND FROM TO L T R Total L T R Total L T R Total L T R Total TOTAL 05:00 PM 06:00 PM - 1394 6411101 - 1101 630 - 54 684 - - - - 3820 PEAK HOUR FACTOR 0.97 0.87 0.65 NA 0.94 NOTES: A seasonal adjustment factor of 1.01 was used. 09/23/97 139581 C. W K4 W DPA 97117 SUMMARY OF PM PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS LOCATION: Biscayne Boulevard/1-395/NE 13 Terrace CITY: Miami COUNTY: Dade DATE: 9/16/97 OBSERVER:DPA REMARKS: TIME NORTHBOUND SORTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND GRAND FROM TO L T R I Total L T I R I Total L I T I R Total L T I R Total TOTAL 04:00 PM 04:15 PM 18 281 - 299 - 235 16 251 - - - 0 78 36 31 145 695 04:15 PM 04:30 PM 11 265 - 276 - 185 11 196 - - - 0 65 21 30 116 588 04:30 PM 04:45 PM 13 291 - 304 - 163 14 177 - - - 0 69 45 41 155 636 04:45 PM 05:00 PM 16 298 - 314 - 202 13 215 - - - 0 98 38 41 177 706 05:00 PM 05:15 PM 15 337 - 352 - 236 16 252 - - - 0 92 58 26 176 780 05:15 PM 05:30 PM 13 354 - 367 - 219 16 235 - - - 0 92 39 18 149 751 05:30 PM 05:45 PM 18 345 - 363 - 214 19 233 - - - 0 87 31 29 147 743 05:45 PM 06:00 PM 8 344 - 352 - 182 18 200 - - - 0 65 44 37 146 698 PM PEAK HOUR CALCULATIONS Seasonally Adjusted PM Peak Hour Volumes TIME NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND GRAND FROM TO L T R Total L T R Total L I T R Total L —T—F R I Total I TOTAL 04:45 PM 05:45 PM 63 1347 - 1410 - 880 65 944 - - �-O 373 168 115 655 3010 PEAK HOUR FACTOR 0.95 0.93 NA 0.92 0.96 NOTES: A seasonal adjustment factor of 1.01 was used. 09/23/97 BISC 13. W K4 APPENDIX C Intersection Schematics 0* PH • D PRE ORY Ba \•L NE 6 ST AT BISCAYNE BLYD N.T.S. N.T.S. Q NESST PARKING 2� LOT \�\ L NE 5 ST AT BISCAYNE BLYD DEXH I BIT _I EXISTING PROJECT INSTERSECTIONS Q p MARITIME PARK ARENA SCHEMATIC DIAGRAMS C'� 1.395 OFF RAMP NE NE_ 8 ST l a � II BISCAYNE BLVD AT NE II ST NE 8 ST AT BISCAYNE BLVD EXISTING PROJECT INSTERSECTIONS MARITIME PARK ARENA SCHEMATIC DIAGRAMS N.T.S. EXHIBIT C'2 MARITIME PARK ARENA BISCAYNE BLVD AT NE 13 ST r.S. EXHIBIT EXISTING PROTECT INSTERSECnONS SCHEMATIC DIAGRAMS I C'3 APPENDIX D Intersection Capacity Analysis HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4d 09-22-1997 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation Streets: (E-W)-N.E. 5 Street (N-S) Biscayne Boulevard Analyst: DPA File Name: BIS5STE.HC9 Area Type: Other 9-17-97 PM PK H Comment: EXISTING (1997) TRAFFIC CONDITIONS (EASTMOST APPROACH) --------------- - Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes ---- ---- ---- 1> 3 ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- 4< ---- ---- ---- 2 4 Volumes 221 94 1642 46 149 974 Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vols 60 15 15 Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left * NB Left Thru * Thru Right Right Peds Peds WB Left SB Left Thru Thru Right Right Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 30.OA Green 42.OP 16.OA Yellow/AR 4.0 Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0 Cycle Length: 100 secs Phase combination order: #1 #5 #6 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS --- ----- --- ----- ----------- EB L 414 1336 ----- ----- ----- 0.198 0.310 19.3 C 19.2 C LT 1472 4750 0.187 0.310 19.2 C NB TR 2948 6856 0.657 0.430 15.1 C 15.1 C SB L 558 3282 0.290 0.170 27.6 D 6.2 B T 4331 6875 0.260 0.630 3.1 A Intersection Delay = 12.3 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B Lost Time/Cycle, L = 9.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.432 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- D-1 HCM: SIGNALIZED INZLRSECTION SUMMARY Version .&.4d 09-24-1997 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation Streets: (E-W) N.E. 5 Street (N-S) Biscayne Boulevard Analyst: DPA File Name: BIS5STEF.HC9 Area Type: Other 9-17-97 PM PK H Comment: FUTURE 1999 TRAFFIC CONDITIONS WITH PROJECT (EASTMOST APPROACH) Eastbound ------------------------------------ Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R ---- ---- ---- L ---- T R ---- L T R L T R No. Lanes 1> 3 ---- ---- ---- ---- 4 < ---- ---- ---- 2 4 Volumes 231 107 1712 49 157 1025 Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vols 60 15 15 Lost Time ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left * NB Left Thru * Thru Right Right Peds Peds WB Left SB Left Thru Thru Right Right Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 30.OA Green 42.OP 16.OA Yellow/AR 4.0 Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0 Cycle Length: 100 secs Phase combination order: #1 #5 #6 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow ----- ----------- Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS EB L 414 1336 ----- ----- ----- --- ----- --- 0.205 0.310 19.3 C 19.3 C LT 1472 4750 0.202 0.310 19.3 C NB TR 2947 6854 0.686 0.430 15.4 C 15.4 C SB L 558 3282 0.305 0.170 27.7 D 6.2 B T 4331 6875 0.274 0.630 3.1 A Intersection Delay = 12.5 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B Lost Time/Cycle, L = 9.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.451 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- D-2 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTrRSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4d 09-22-1997 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation ------------------------- Streets: (E-W) N.E. 5 Street (N-S) Biscayne Boulevard Analyst: DPA File Name: BIS5ST.HC9 Area Type: Other 9-17-97 PM PK H Comment: EXISTING (1997) TRAFFIC CONDITIONS (WESTMOST APPROACH) ----=------------------------- Eastbound - Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R ---- L T R ---- ---- ---- No. Lanes ---- ---- ---- 3 1 ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- 4< 2 4 Volumes 315 107 1642 46 149 974 Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vols 60 15 15 Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left NB Left Thru * Thru Right * Right Peds Peds WB Left SB Left Thru Thru Right Right Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 30.OA Green 42.OP 16.OA Yellow/AR 4.0 Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0 Cycle Length: 100 secs Phase combination order: #1 #5 #6 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS ----- --- ----- --- ----- ----------- EB T 1472 4750 ----- ----- 0.248 0.310 19.6 C 19.5 C R 417 1346 0.120 0.310 18.8 C NB TR 2948 6856 0.657 0.430 15.1 C 15.1 C SB L 558 3282 0.290 0.170 27.6 D 6.2 B T 4331 6875 0.260 0.630 3.1 A Intersection Delay = 12.4 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B Lost Time/Cycle, L = 9.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.449 --------------------------------------------------------------------- D-3 HCM: SIGNALIZED INThRSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4d 09-24-1997 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation Streets: (E-W) N.E. 5 Street (N-S) Biscayne Boulevard Analyst: DPA File Name: BIS5STF.HC9 Area Type: Other 9-17-97 PM PK H Comment: FUTURE 1999 TRAFFIC CONDITIONS W PROJECT (WESTMOST APPROACH) Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R ---- ---- L T R ---- ---- ---- No. Lanes ---- ---- ---- 3 1 ---- ---- ---- ---- 4< 2 4 Volumes 338 111 1712 49 157 1025 Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vols 60 15 15 Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left NB Left Thru * Thru Right * Right Peds Peds WB Left SB Left Thru Thru Right Right Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 30.OA Green 42.OP 16.OA Yellow/AR 4.0 Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0 Cycle Length: 100 secs Phase combination order: #1 #5 #6 ------------------------------------------------------------- Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS EB T 1472 -4750 0.266 0.310 19.7 C 19.6 C R 417 1346 0.129 0.310 18.9 C NB TR 2947 6854 0.686 0.430 15.4 C 15.4 C SB L 558 3282 0.305 0.170 27.7 D 6.2 B T 4331 6875 0.274 0.630 3.1 A Intersection Delay = 12.7 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B Lost Time/Cycle, L = 9.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.472 --------------------------------------------------------------- - D-4 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4d 09-23-1997 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation Streets: (E-W) N.E. 6 Street (N-S) Biscayne Boulevard Analyst: DPA File Name: BIS6ST.HC9 Area Type: Other 9-17-97 PM PK H Comment: EXISTING (1997) TRAFFIC CONDITIONS ^ Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R ---- ---- L ---- T R ---- ---- No. Lanes ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- 1 3< ---- 2 4 6< Volumes 146 423 380 66 1817 1005 41 Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vols 10 0 15 Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left NB Left Thru Thru Right Right Peds Peds WB Left * SB Left Thru * Thru Right * g Right Peds eds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 40.OA Green 38.OP 5.OA Yellow/AR 7.0 Yellow/AR 5.0 5.0 Cycle Length: 100 secs Phase combination order: #1 #5 #6 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay ----- LOS --- Delay LOS ----- --- ----- ---- WB L 640 ------- ----- ----- 1455 0.241 0.440 13.4 B 14.4 B TR 2287 5197 0.401 0.440 14.5 B NB L 248 3539 0.287 0.070 33.7 D 11.1 B T 3707 7414 0.568 0.500 10.3 B SB TR 4439 11098 0.269 0.400 13.7 B 13.7 B Intersection Delay = 12.6 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B Lost Time/Cycle, L ----------------------------------------------------------------------- = 6.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.490 D-5 HCM: SIGNALIZED IN1LttSECTION SUMMARY Version �&.4d 09-24-1997 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation Streets: (E-W) N.E. 6 Street (N-S) Biscayne Boulevard Analyst: DPA File Name: BIS6STF.HC9 Area Type: Other 9-17-97 PM PK H Comment: FUTURE 1999 TRAFFIC CONDITIONS W PROJECT Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- No. Lanes 1 3< 2 4 6< Volumes 161 460 398 69 1892 1051 44 Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vols 10 0 15 Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left NB Left Thru Thru Right Right Peds Peds WB Left * SB Left Thru * Thru Right * Right Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 40.OA Green 38.OP 5.OA Yellow/AR 7.0 Yellow/AR 5.0 5.0 Cycle Length: 100 secs Phase combination order: #1 #5 #6 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS ----- ----------- ----- ----- ----- --- ----- --- WB L 640 1455 0.264 0.440 13.5 B 14.6 B TR 2290 5205 0.428 0.440 14.7 B NB L 248 3539 0.303 0.070 33.7 D 11.3 B T 3707 7414 0.591 0.500 10.5 B SB TR 4438 11095 0.282 0.400 13.8 B 13.8 B Intersection Delay = 12.8 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B Lost Time/Cycle, L = 6.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.515 ------------------------------------------------------------------- - A HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1d BISBST.HCO Page 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 ----------------------- Streets: (N-S) Biscayne Boulevard (E-W) NE 8 Street Major Street Direction.... NS Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) Analyst ................... DPA Date of Analysis.......... 9/18/97 Other Information ......... Existing (1997) Traffic Conditions Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection ---------------------------- Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes Stop/Yield Volumes PHF Grade MCI (%) SU/RV's (%) CV' s ( o ) PCE's ------------ 0 > 4 0 N 66 2244 .95 .95 0 1.10 --------------- 0 4 < 0 N 1155 41 .95 .95' 0 ---------------- 0 > 1 < 0 41 0 11 .95 .95 .95 0 1.10 1.10 1.10 ---------------- Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver ------------------------------------------------------------------ Gap (tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road 5.50 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.50 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 7.00 3.40 D-7 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1d BIS8ST.HCO Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection -------------------------------------------------------- Step 1: RT from Minor Street WB -------------------------------------------------------- EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 326 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 947 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 947 Prob. of Queue -Free State: -------------------------------------------------------- 0.99 Step 2: LT from Major Street SB -------------------------------------------------------- NB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 1259 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 362 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 362 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.79 TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 6800 RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) Major LT Shared Lane Prob. of Queue -Free State: -------------------------------------------------------- 0.68 Step 3: TH from Minor Street WB -------------------------------------------------------- EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 3668 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 8 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.68 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 5 Prob. of Queue -Free State: -------------------------------------------------------- 1.00 Step 4: LT from Minor Street WB -------------------------------------------------------- EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 3668 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 5 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0.68 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.68 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.68 Movement Capacity: (pcph) -------------------------------------------------------- 3 a HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1d BISBST.HCO Page 3 Flow Rate Movement (pcph) -------- EB L ------ 47 EB T 0 EB R 13 NB L 76 Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Move Shared Total Queue Approach Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay (pcph) (pcph) ------ ------ (sec/veh) ------- (veh) ------- ----- (sec/veh) --------- 3 > 5 > 4 * 28.2 F 947 > 362 12.6 0.9 C 0.4 Intersection Delay = 395.3 sec/veh * The calculated value was greater than 999.9. HCS_-Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1d BISBSTF.HCO Page 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 Streets: (N-S) Biscayne ne Boulevard ----------------------(E-W) NE 8 Street=====___ Major Street Direction.... NS Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) Analyst ................... DPA Date of Analysis.......... 9/18/97 Other Information......... Future 1999 Traffic Conditions with Pro ject Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection ------------------------------ Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes Stop/Yield Volumes PHF Grade MCI (%) SU/RV's (o) CV' s 0-0) PCE's ------------ 0 > 4 < 0 N 69 2338 2 .95 .95 .95 0 1.10 --------------- 0 > 4 < 0 N 13 1206 43 .95 .95 .95 0 1.10 ---------------- 0 > 1 < 0 43 1 12 .95 .95 .95 0 1.10 1.10 1.10 ---------------- Adjustment Factors 1 1 < 0 2 1 29 .95 .95 .95 0 1.10 1.10 1.10 --------------- Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver ------------------------------------------------------------------ Gap (tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road 5.50 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.50 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 7.00 3.40 D-10 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1d BIS8STF.HCO Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection -------------------------------------------------------- Step l: RT from Minor Street -------------------------------------------------------- WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 616 340 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 675 931 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 675 931 Prob. of Queue -Free State: -------------------------------------------------------- 0.95 0.98 Step 2: LT from Major Street -------------------------------------------------------- SB NB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 2463 1314 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 82 338 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 82 338 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.82 0.76 TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 6800 6800 RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 1700 Major LT Shared Lane Prob. of Queue -Free State: -------------------------------------------------------- 0.77 0.63 Step 3: TH from Minor Street -------------------------------------------------------- WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 3863 3842 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 6 6 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.48 0.48 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 3 3 Prob. of Queue -Free State: -------------------------------------------------------- 0.67 0.67 Step 4: LT from Minor Street -------------------------------------------------------- WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 3820 3840 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 4 4 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0.32 0.32 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.45 0.45 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.45 0.43 Movement Capacity: (pcph) -------------------------------------------------------- 2 2 D-11 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1d BIS8STF.HCO Page 3 Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph) ------ (sec/veh) ------- (veh) ------- ----- (sec/veh) --------- --------- EB L ------ 50 ------ 2 > EB T 1 3> 3 * 31.1 F EB R 14 931 > WB L 2 2 * 0.8 F WB T 1 3 > 284.8 WB R 34 675 > 91 63.8 1.8 F NB L 80 338 13.9 1.0 C 0.4 SB L 15 82 53.7 0.7 F 0.6 Intersection Delay = 593.1 sec/veh * The calculated value was greater than 999.9. D-12 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4d 09-24-1997 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation Streets: (E-W) N.E. 8 Street (N-S) Biscayne Boulevard Analyst: DPA File Name: BIS8STFI.HC9 Area Type: Other 9-17-97 PM PK H Comment: FUTURE 1999 TRAFFIC CONDITIONS W PROJECT WITH IMPROVEMENTS -------------------------------- - Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- No. Lanes > 1 < 1 1 < > 4 < > 4 < Volumes 43 1 12 2 1 29 69 2338 2 13 1206 43 Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vols 0 5 0 15 Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left * NB Left Thru * Thru Right * Right Peds Peds WB Left * SB Left Thru * Thru Right * Right Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 30.OA Green 80.OP Yellow/AR 5.0 Yellow/AR 5.0 Cycle Length: 120 secs Phase combination order: #1 #5 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS ----- ----------- ----- ----- ----- --- ----- --- EB LTR 380 1426 0.155 0.267 25.6 D 25.6 D WB L 394 1476 0.005 0.267 24.6 C 24.9 C TR 413 1548 0.065 0.267 25.0 C NB DfL 117 171 0.625 0.683 7.8 B 3.5 A TR 3685 5392 0.735 0.683 3.4 A SB DfL 99 145 0.141 0.683 5.1 B 2.1 A TR 3672 5374 0.389 0.683 2.0 A Intersection Delay = 3.5 sec/veh Intersection LOS = A Lost Time/Cycle, L = 6.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.572 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- D-13 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4d 09-23-1997 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation Streets: (E-W) I-395 Ramp/NE it TER (N-S) Biscayne Boulevard Analyst: DPA File Name: BIS11TR.HC9 Area Type: Other 9-17-97 PM PK H Comment: EXISTING (1997) TRAFFIC CONDITIONS Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- No. Lanes 2 1 3 1 3 Volumes 630 54 1394 641 1101 Lane W ( f t ) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vols 40 0 15 Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left * NB Left Thru Thru Right * Right Peds Peds WB Left SB Left Thru Thru Right Right Peds Peds NB Right * EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 51.OA Green 54.OP Yellow/AR 5.0 Yellow/AR 5.0 Cycle Length: 115 secs Phase combination order: #1 #5 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS ----- ----------- ----- ----- ----- --- ----- --- EB L 1236 2681 0.553 0.461 17.4 C 17.3 C R 620 1346 0.024 0.461 12.8 B NB T 2523 5182 0.640 0.487 13.4 B 9.5 B R 1439 1439 0.469 1.000 0.2 A SB T 2506 5147 0.509 0.487 12.1 B 12.1 B Intersection Delay = 11.6 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B Lost Time/Cycle, L = 6.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.597 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- D-14 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTzRSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4d 09-24-1997 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation ------------------- - - Streets: (E-W) I-395 Ramp/NE 11 TER (N-S) Biscayne Boulevard Analyst: DPA File Name: BISIITRF.HC9 Area Type: Other 9-17-97 PM PK H Comment: FUTURE 1999 TRAFFIC CONDITIONS W PROJECT --------------------------- - Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- No. Lanes 2 1 3 1 3 Volumes 656 64 1474 675 1154 Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vols 40 0 15 Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left * NB Left Thru Thru Right * Right Peds Peds WB Left SB Left Thru Thru Right Right Peds Peds NB Right * EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 51.OA Green 54.OP Yellow/AR 5.0 Yellow/AR 5.0 Cycle Length: 115 secs Phase combination order: #1 #5 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS ----- ----------- ----- ----- ----- --- ----- --- EB L 1236 2681 0.576 0.461 17.7 C 17.5 C R 620 1346 0.040 0.461 12.9 B NB T 2523 5182 0.676 0.487 13.9 B 9.9 B R 1439 1439 0.494 1.000 0.2 A SB T 2506 5147 0.533 0.487 12.4 B 12.4 B Intersection Delay = 11.9 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B Lost Time/Cycle, L = 6.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.628 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- D-15 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTt�RSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4d 09-23-1997 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation Streets: (E-W)-I395/NE 13 Terr (N-S) Biscayne Boulevard Analyst: DPA File Name: BISI3TE.HC9 Area Type: Other 9-17-97 PM PK H Comment: EXISTING 1997 TRAFFIC CONDITIONS ------------------------------ Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R ---- L T R ---- ---- No. Lanes ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- 2 2 1 ---- ---- 1 2 ---- 2 1 Volumes 373 168 115 63 1347 880 65 Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vols 60 15 60 Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left NB Left Thru Thru Right Right Peds Peds WB Left * SB Left Thru * Thru Right * g Right Peds eds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 19.OA Green 8.OP 75.OA Yellow/AR 5.0 Yellow/AR 3.0 5.0 Cycle Length: 115 secs Phase combination order: #1 #5 #6 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS --- ----- --- ----- ----------- WB L 530 ----- ----- ----- 2903 0.764 0.183 37.4 D 34.9 D T 631 3455 0.295 0.183 30.9 D R 268 1468 0.216 0.183 30.4 D NB L 257 1641 0.257 0.765 0.1 A 0.2 A T 2617 3420 0.569 0.765 0.2 A SB T 2313 3455 0.420 0.670 2.5 A 2.5 A R 964 1439 0.005 0.670 1.8 A Intersection Delay = 8.0 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B Lost Time/Cycle, L = ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 6.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.607 D-16 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4d 09-24-1997 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation Streets: (E-W) I395/NE 13 Terr (N-S) Biscayne Boulevard Analyst: DPA File Name: BISI3TER.HC9 Area Type: Other 9-17-97 PM PK H Comment: FUTURE 1999 TRAFFIC CONDITIONS W PROJECT Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R ---- ---- L T R ---- ---- ---- No. Lanes ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- 2 2 1 ---- 1 2 2 1 Volumes 391 175 120 80 1412 921 72 Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vols 60 15 60 Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left NB Left Thru Thru Right Right Peds Peds WB Left * SB Left Thru * Thru Right * Right Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 19.OA Green 8.OP 75.OA Yellow/AR 5.0 Yellow/AR 3.0 5.0 Cycle Length: 115 secs Phase combination order: #1 #5 #6 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS --- ----- --- ----- ---- WB L 530 ------- ----- ----- ----- 2903 0.800 0.183 38.7 D 35.8 D T 631 3455 0.306 0.183 31.0 D R 268 1468 0.235 0.183 30.6 D NB L 251 1641 0.335 0.765 0.2 A 0.2 A T 2617 3420 0.596 0.765 0.2 A SB T 2313 3455 0.440 0.670 2.6 A 2.6 A R 964 1439 0.013 0.670 1.8 A Intersection Delay = 8.2 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B Lost Time/Cycle, L ----------------------------------------------------------------------- = 6.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.635 D-17 APPENDIX E Land Use Exchange Rates for Downtown Miami DRI PH x Office 0.0005985 Retail/Service 0.000519 Hotel (per room) 0.202 m r Residential (per d.u.) 0.1360563 Convention 0.000114 Wholesale/Industrial 0.0001324 Instituional 0.00132 Attractions/Recreation (per seat) 0.0020588 Marine Facilities 0.0005985 Table-1 LAND USE EXCHANGE -RATES FOR DOWNTOWN DRI (per gross square footage, except as otherwise indicated) Office Retail/ Hotel Residential Convention Wholesale/ Institutional Attractions/ Marine Service (per room) (per d.u.) Industrial Recreation Facilities (per seat) Y{ 0.0005985 0.000519 0.202 0:1360563 0.1360563 0.000114 0.00132 0.0020588 0.0005985 1.0000 1.1532 0.0030 0.0044 5.2500 4.5204 0.4534 0.2907 1.0000 0.8672 1.0000 0.0026 0.0038 4.5526 3.9199 0.3932 0.2521 0.8672 337.5104 389.2100 1.0000 1.4847 1,771.9298 1,525.6789 153.0303 98.1154 337.5104 227.3288 262.1509 0.6735 1.0000 1,193.4763 1,027.6156 103.0730 66.0852 227.3288 0.1905 0.2197 0.0006 0.0008 1.0000 0.8610 0.0864 0.0554 0.1905 0.2212 0.2551 0.0007 0.0010 1.1614 1.0000 0.1003 0.0643 0.2212 2.2055 2.5434 0.0065 0.0097 11.5789 9.9698 1.0000 0.6412 2.2055 3.4399 3.9669 0.0102 0.0151 18.0596 15.5498 1.5597 1.0000 3.4399 1.0000 1.1532 0.0030 0.0044 5.2500 4.5204 0.4534 0.2907 1.0000 formula for calculation x/y • exchange rate x and y both represent the number of PM Peak Hour External Motor Vehicle Trip Ends per unit of land use derived from the Downtown Miami A.D.A. 4k . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Af ft 111. L�J Exhibit A-2 Downtown DRI Maritime Park Arena Transportation Management Plan Outline TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Special Events Intersection Geometries ...................................... 1 • Temporary de -activation of traffic signals ..................................... 2 • Turn Prohibitions.......................................................2 2. Adjustment of Roadway Geometries during Special Events ...................... 2 • Closure of median openings ............................................... 2 3. Reversible Lanes ........................................................ 2 • Imbalanced Lanes ....................................................... 3 • Conversion from two-way to one-way streets, and vice -versa ...................... 3 • Contra -Flow bus lanes ................................................... 3 4. Police Traffic Control .................................................... 3 5. Traffic Signal Improvements ............................................... 3 • Intersection equipment replacement ......................................... 3 • Improved traffic control devices ............................................ 3 • Signal timing plans designed specially for times when a special event is in place ......... 3 • Enhanced pedestrian signal equipment ........................................ 3 • Bus traffic signal pre-emption .............................................. 3 6. Expressway Directional Signs .............................................. 3 • Traffic control signs to direct traffic on local streets ............................. 3 • Intelligent Transportation Systems .......................................... 4 7. Access and Parking Information ............................................ 4 • Developing an Internet Web site ............................................ 4 • Working with the media to provide information ................................ 4 • Providing route, access, and parking information ................................ 4 • Developing a "hotline" for patrons .......................................... 4 • The development of an arena guide book ..................................... 4 8. Transit................................................................4 • Creation of Bus/Shuttle drop-off areas ....................................... 4 • Feeder Bus system......................................................4 • Shuttle System.........................................................4 • Promoting transit passes .................................................. 4 • Adjusting the Metrorail/Metromover schedule .................................. 4 • Creating fixed routes and express bus services .................................. 4 • Providing off-street transit loading zones ..................................... 4 9. Other High Occupancy Vehicle Alternatives .................................. 5 • Creation of reversible High Occupancy Vehicle lanes ............................ 5 • High Occupancy preferential parking ......................................... 5 10. Other Modes of Transportation ........................................... 5 • Enhanced pedestrian crosswalks ............................................ 5 • Enhancing sidewalks to encourage pedestrian access ............................. 5 • Promoting car pooling ................................................... 5 • Promoting other modes of transportation such as water taxis ...................... 5 Exhibit A-2 Downtown DRI Maritime Park Arena Transportation Management Plan Outline A Transportation Management Plan (TMP) will be developed to accommodate the Maritime Park Arena volumes during special events. The plan recognizes that the Maritime Park Arena traffic can be absorbed by the existing street system if supported by special operational plans during event hours. This is due to the fact that most Maritime Park Arena events will occur during the "off-peak" hours of roadway use. The plan also recognizes the importance of police assisted traffic control, car pooling, use of available transit, directional signage and the like. It is possible that several sub -plans will be developed depending on the level of patronage. A Miami Heat sellout, for instance, will have a more comprehensive plan than an event not expected to fill the Maritime Park Arena. The following list is a compilation of potential strategies which will form the basis for the Maritime Park Arena TMP. The plan will be submitted to the agencies reviewing this element of the traffic study. The plan will be adjusted, as needed, prior to the Maritime Park Arena obtaining a Certificate of Occupancy. 1. Special Events Intersection Geometrics. This will consist of temporarily revising lane geometrics at key intersections in order to allow, for example, double turn lanes. This temporary measure will accommodate additional demand created by special events and recognizes the directionallity of access to/from events. In order to assure successful operations, these temporary turn lanes will be police controlled. Temporary traffic control devices will also be required. These include, but are not limited to, roadside signs, barricades, and traffic cones. The extent to which these modifications will be recommended will depend on the size of the event. This strategy will be especially useful in the vicinity of project driveways where turning movement volumes will be significantly increased during special events. Other strategies that may be considered under this technique include: • Temporary de -activation of traffic signals. Signals that may warranted during the pm peak hour may not be needed during event hours. These signals may be operated in flashing operations mode during event hours. Police assistance at these intersections may be required. • Turn Prohibitions. Turns from the minor streets would be limited to right turns only during an event (i.e., eastbound approaches to Biscayne Boulevard from NE 9 Street, NE 10 Street, etc.). 2. Adjustment of Roadway Geometries during Special Events. This will consist of temporarily revising lane geometries at roadway links in order to minimize delays and/or conflicts during special events. • Closure of median openings. Median openings along Biscayne Boulevard may be closed during special events in order to minimize conflicts. This measure would minimize delays of traffic destined to and from the special event, as well as minimizing conflicts and potential accidents. 3. Reversible Lanes. This strategy would provide the site with additional lanes to facilitate access when high demand is in one direction only (i.e., entering or exiting a special event). This can be a partial as well as a total modification. For example, NE 8 Street is generally a two-way roadway. The Maritime Park Arena is proposing a driveway that would align with NE 8 Street. During special events, the roadway can be converted to a 2-lane, one-way eastbound road when patrons are entering a special event. The pattern can be reversed to a one-way westbound road to accommodate the additional outbound demand. Police control, as well as traffic control devices, will be required to successfully implement this strategy. N The Maritime Park Arena entrances will most likely be reversible and/or imbalanced. Other options that will be studied include: • Imbalanced lanes (i.e., converting a 4 lane, 2-way road into 3 lanes in one direction and one in the other). • Conversion from two-way to one-way streets, and vice -versa. • Contra -Flow bus lanes. 4. Police Traffic Control. Signal timing may be overridden by police officers at intersections of high demand during special events. This would enable traffic to flow more rapidly in the direction of additional demand. 5. Traffic Signal Improvements. Traffic signal improvements can enhance the overall traffic operations of a roadway network. Related strategies may include: • Intersection equipment replacement. • Improved traffic control devices. • Signal timing plans designed specially for times when a special event is in place. • Enhanced pedestrian signal equipment. • Bus traffic signal pre-emption. 6. Expressway Directional Signs. The project site can be accessed from two expressways: I-95 and I-395. Numerous ramps and interchanges service the Downtown Miami area providing ample capacity and access to accommodate project traffic during special events. Because of the multi entry/exit points in Downtown Miami, dispersing traffic loads without compromising travel time is possible. However, it is important to inform motorists of their alternatives because many may be unfamiliar with Downtown Miami. Signs, either conventional or variable message (intelligent system), can 3 achieve this goal of distributing traffic throughout the system. Additional elements that can be studied as part of this strategy are: • Traffic control signs to direct traffic on local streets. • Intelligent Transportation Systems. 7. Access and Parking Information. This strategy would provide season ticket holders and the general public with information/maps on recommended routing to the Maritime Park Arena and available parking areas on and off site. By doing so, it will be possible to take advantage of the multi access points to Downtown Miami and also allow the patron to plan ahead on their parking destination. This strategy is expected to be especially effective since patrons of the events proposed at this site are repeat users (ticket holders) who will become familiar with the pattern quickly. Additional strategies may include: • Developing an Internet Web site that provides text and maps of key access points, routes, and parking destinations. • Working with the media to provide this information via newscasts, the newspaper, radio, etc. • Providing route, access, and parking information/maps with season ticket mailings, single game ticket purchases, etc.. • Developing a "hotline" for patrons with questions regarding route, access, parking information, and public transit information. • The development of an arena guide book made available to patrons which will include information on issues such as parking, transit, access, and routes to the site. 8. Transit. Transit routes and schedules may be adjusted to accommodate special events. Other related strategies are: • Creation of Bus/Shuttle drop-off areas. A lane on Biscayne Boulevard may need to be temporarily closed by using traffic cones to provide a bus/shuttle drop-off area. • Feeder Bus system. II • Shuttle System (Private or Public) from Metrorail, remote parking areas, and the like. • Promoting transit passes throughout the downtown area during special events. • Adjusting the Metrorail/Metromover schedule during special events. • Creating fixed routes and express bus services. • Providing off-street transit loading zones. 9. Other High Occupancy Vehicle Alternatives. This strategy is designed to promote higher vehicle occupancies by giving preferential treatment to vehicles with more than 2 occupants. Related strategies include: • Creation of reversible High Occupancy Vehicle lanes during special events. This task may include the creation of buses and/or shuttle service around the downtown area for event patrons. • High Occupancy preferential parking. 10. Other Modes of Transportation. The purpose of this strategy is to reduce the vehicle trip - ends to the special event by encouraging transit use, increase auto occupancy, and the like. Additional strategies may include: • Enhanced pedestrian crosswalks. • Enhancing sidewalks to encourage pedestrian access. • Promoting car pooling. • Promoting other modes of transportation such as water taxis. TMP I .RPT 61 �II� A�� t.. Qor�c� DRI Ma�q� Mko Dot 1�egie�r��h P�ote G�kagex 6�w� the Fmj�t and dre Dm�tow�la�d�t ��m P�We� (aamuo'� Exhibit A-3 Downtown DRI Maritime Park Arena Development Strategies Which Promote Linkages Between the Project and The Downtown/Southeast Overtown Park West Community TABLE OF CONTENTS A. Pedestrian Linkages......................................................1 1. Off -site Parking/Walk.................................................. 1 a. Pedestrian Focal Points .............................................. 1 b. Port Boulevard Pedestrian Bridge ....................................... 2 c. Pedestrian Friendly Areas ............................................. 2 B. Transit/Walk...........................................................3 C. Shuttles..............................................................3 D. Water Taxi.............................................................4 Exhibit A-3 Downtown DRI Maritime Park Arena Development Strategies Which Promote Linkages Between the Project and The Downtown/Southeast Overtown Park West Community A. Pedestrian Linkages Pedestrian access to the project is critical to the success of the facility. Project design places great importance on pedestrian access in as much as on -site parking is limited. This translates into the majority of the arena patrons ultimately reaching the site by means other than automobiles. There are four potential modes of access for patrons that do not park at the site: off -site parking/walk, transit/walk, shuttle, and water taxi. This linkages proposal recognizes that while the arena operators do control the physical features of the arena site, most of the potential modes of access are not controlled by them. A partnership is needed between the Downtown Development Authority (DDA), the City of Miami, Dade County, the Florida Department of Transportation, transit operators, parking operators, and area businesses. The Arena management is committed to, and supportive of, these partnerships. 1. Off -site Parking/Walk The largest component of site access will be patrons parking in adjacent lots and garages in the immediate vicinity (4 blocks) of the arena. These patrons will most likely be walking to the site using the existing sidewalks. Linkages to these parking facilities in Downtown and Southeast Overtown Park West will be primarily at grade and may be supplemented in the form of pedestrian bridges. a. Pedestrian Focal Points These are at -grade pedestrian crossings that cater to and channelize pedestrians into and out of the arena site. Pedestrian Focal Points are anticipated at several Biscayne Boulevard locations in front of the site: NE 6th, 7th,- 8th, and 9th Streets. Pedestrian bridges were considered for Biscayne Boulevard. However, structures at these locations are both ineffective, and incompatible with the aesthetics of the planned Biscayne Boulevard. Special treatment of these Focal Points should include: well marked, oversized crosswalks; large refuge space at the intersection sidewalks and Biscayne Boulevard median; large display pedestrian signals; pedestrian cycle signal actuation (push buttons); special event pedestrian signal timing plan; police control; etc. b. Port Boulevard Pedestrian Bridge The volume and type of traffic on Port Boulevard make that facility better suited for a pedestrian bridge. Dade County plans to build a bridge over Port Boulevard connecting the plaza level of the arena (north side of Port Boulevard) with the upper level of Bayside and the City Marina areas (on the south side). A pedestrian bridge at the location will provide a linkage to the Downtown area immediately south, and will facilitate the flow of pedestrian traffic from the Bayside/City Marina area. c. Pedestrian Friendly Areas The area four blocks around the arena will experience heavy pedestrian traffic generated by patrons parking nearby. Pedestrian amenities will strengthen the linkages to off -site parking facilities in Downtown and the Southeast Overtown Park West areas. In general, these amenities could include wide sidewalks, landscaping, lighting security, etc. (see section on Urban Design and Landscaping). The initiative of the City, DDA and private enterprises will be needed to the effect these strategies over time. It is expected that the new arena will be a catalyst for development of properties west of Biscayne Boulevard. As such, it is anticipated that the new developments created as a result will enhance and provide urban development improvements as part of their development strategies. 2 The Florida Department of Transportation is undertaking a Project Design and Environment Study for the section of Biscayne Boulevard (US 1) between Port Boulevard and I-395. The PD&E study will evaluate alternatives, assess the impacts, and make final recommendations regarding the ultimate configuration of US 1. Preliminary analysis suggests that the typical cross section could be about 168 ft, as follows: 2-15' sidewalks (to replace the existing sidewalks ranging in width between 6' and IT), 8-11' lanes (4 in each direction to replace the eight existing lanes), and a 50' median (to replace the current painted median). This design is very sensitive to pedestrian needs. It provides a wider sidewalk, as well as a wide median refuge areas. The Burle Marx paving design, already adopted by the City, will be used for the sidewalk areas. Appropriate landscaping and other pedestrian amenities consistent with the area will be considered during the preliminary design. B. Transit/Walk A transit pedestrian corridor is desirable to provide a linkage from major transit facilities to the arena. This linkage can also be used as a pedestrian linkage to Downtown and Southeast Overtown/Parkwest. The most effective corridor would be one connecting the arena to the Overtown MetroRail Station via NE/NW 7 Street and NW 8 Street. This route is four blocks long, and fairly direct. It will also bring the pedestrians to the NE 7th Street crossing, away from the busier NE 5th, 6th, and 8th Streets intersections which are dominated by vehicular traffic. Pedestrian amenities could be provided as described above. Similar transit pedestrian corridors, perhaps blending into the Pedestrian Friendly Areas described above, could be provided for other transit facilities such as the following MetroMover stations: Bayfront Park, First Street, College/Bayside, College North, Freedom Tower, Park West, Eleventh Street, and Bicentennial Park. The leadership of DDA and the City will be required in the proactive pursuit of these strategies. C. Shuttles Shuttle linkages should be implemented to establish connections with the Downtown and Southeast Overtown/Park West areas, as well as connections with other elements of the 3 transportation system. Several shuttle routes (designated by colors and/or symbols -wayfaring) will be needed to service: areas residents and workers; transit riders from the MetroRail's Overtown and Government Center Stations, passengers from the MetroBus transfer station on Flagler Street, and transit users from the more remote MetroMover stations; patrons parking in nearby lots and garages, as well as, remote parking facilities; hotels, and major area attractions, restaurants, etc. Shuttle stops on Biscayne Boulevard, north of NE 8 Street will provide convenient shuttle and pedestrian access for ease of use and efficiency. Shuttle staging areas, however, must be designated to ensure that sufficient buses are immediately available after the events to accommodate the concentrated demand. Such capacity is needed both to provide adequate service to the public (with minimal wait time) and to be able to efficiently feed higher capacity systems such as MetroRail. The cooperation of the Dade County Transit Agency will be important in implementing the transit related routes and supporting shuttle services. The continued leadership of the City of Miami and DDA will be needed to effect other supporting shuttle services offered by Downtown businesses. DDA has already mentioned the potential use of the Flagler Street and Brickell electric shuttle buses and trams in the evenings and weekends. D. Water Taxi Downtown has water on two sides: the Biscayne Bay and Miami River. Water taxis are mostly an amenity. It is, admittedly, a low capacity connection. However, it should not be discarded. Water taxis can provide an additional linkage to the Downtown areas and Southeast Overtown Park West. Arena patrons could board taxis at locations such as the City of Miami Building, Fort Dallas Park (the Hyatt), Dupont Plaza, Sheraton Hotel, Intercontinental Hotel, Bayside, etc. The arena end of the trip could be on the east side of the arena or the north side. Water taxi facilities, however, must be provided as part of the future Maritime Park development. 97117PL 4 Maritime Park Arena Traffic Study TABLE OF CONTENTS Traffic Study ............................................... Exhibit A-1 Transportation Management Plan Outline ......................... Exhibit A-2 Development Strategies which Promote Linkages between the Project and the Downtown/Southeast Overtown Park West Community ........ Exhibit A-3 HEFT/NW 12 ST - TUR Master File - Nu Build 1 -3600 328 347 3600 1 Free Avg. Marginal Std. Avg. Flow Link System Devi. Avg. Avg. Link Veh. Avg. Avg. Total Total Total Total Link Total Net Travel Travel Travel Travel Veh. Veh. Veh. On Link Link Fuel HC CO NOx I.D. Vehicle Capacity Time Time Time Time Que. Stop Store Link Speed Occup. Cons. Emis. Emis. Emis. 1 5732 6900 8 18 28 0 15 0.54 81 16 51 0 523 4.56 19.8 2.41 2 5384 6900 13 14 26 0 9 0.08 122 12 99 0 219 1.21 5.95 1.22 3 1745 2000 20 23 44 0 0 0.16 28 6 43 0 35.1 0.33 1.5 0.15 4 1738 2000 15 17 33 0 0 0.01 21 4 44 0 25.3 0.23 1.01 0.1 5 1734 2000 8 9 18 0 0 0 11 2 44 0 13.7 0.12 0.52 0.06 6 1727 4000 15 17 24 0 0 0.01 43 4 46 0 25.7 0.22 0.92 0.1 7 538 3800 57 57 67 0 0 0.02 224 4 69 0 52.4 0.9 6.49 0.65 8 2145 5700 2 3 4 0 0 0.01 15 1 49 0 29 0.36 2.18 0.15 9 2141 5700 3 3 5 0 0 0.03 21 1 65 0 26.1 0.26 1.37 0.16 10 1305 2000 20 52 37 0 8 0.3 23 10 15 0 36.5 0.41 1.02 0.07 11 1304 2000 15 42 27 0 7 0.22 17 8 14 0 28.8 0.32 0.7 0.05 12 1302 2000 12 41 25 0 7 0.24 14 8 12 0 27.2 0.31 0.58 0.04 13 1282 2000 13 47 52 0 8 0.33 15 9 11 0 31.2 0.34 0.56 0.04 14 1204 2000 41 159 225 0 29 2.44 46 31 10 0 107 1.16 1.63 0.12 15 188 2000 13 14 15 0 0 0.07 23 0 57 0 3.28 0.05 0.38 0.04 16 1707 5700 12 73 21 0 18 1.02 75 19 12 0 103 1.13 2.84 0.24 17 3907 6900 48 49 80 0 14 0.04 447 30 107 0 518 2.75 21.2 3.52 18 4064 6900 44 45 76 0 15 0.06 405 29 107 0 349 1.74 12.3 2.2 19 1359 2000 24 27 46 0 0 0.1 40 5 54 0 30.8 0.26 1.14 0.15 20 1377 2000 20 23 38 0 0 0.05 34 5 51 0 37.4 0.37 1.81 0.18 21 1286 4000 4 11 7 0 1 0.12 15 2 24 0 24.8 0.27 1.07 0.09 22 1363 4000 5 7 10 0 0 0.21 18 1 41 0 30.9 0.3 1.17 0.1 23 1355 2000 15 16 28 0 0 0 25 3 56 0 22.6 0.17 0.64 0.09 24 1314 2000 15 44 100 0 7 0.37 25 9 20 0 33.5 0.37 1.04 0.09 25 5204 6900 18 22 37 0 13 0.45 173 18 92 0 287 1.54 7.61 1.54 26 5554 6900 18 35 62 0 27 0.41 165 31 55 0 343 2.37 10.1 1.71 27 2729 4000 25 31 49 0 4 0.4 100 13 57 0 98.2 0.68 1.88 0.37 28 280 4000 22 22 23 0 0 0 86 0 69 0 6.66 0.04 0.12 0.03 29 280 4000 12 12 13 0 0 0 50 0 70 0 3.67 0.02 0.06 0.02 30 277 4000 23 23 25 0 0 0.03 92 1 69 0 6.63 0.04 0.1 0.03 31 1932 6900 26 26 34 0 2 0.01 219 8 99 0 87.9 0.42 1.63 0.44 32 3923 6900 32 34 55 0 11 0.29 273 21 93 0 507 7.83 67.9 7.45 33 1804 3800 65 66 101 0 4 0.02 253 18 68 0 192 3.29 23.5 2.36 34 2477 6900 21 22 30 0 2 0.1 180 8 97 0 118 1.42 12.9 1.88 35 1666 6900 32 32 41 0 1 0.03 266 8 98 0 103 0.51 2.01 0.53 36 1216 6900 15 16 19 0 0 0.02 131 3 96 0 52.9 0.29 1.19 0.29 37 1439 4000 9 9 12 0 0 0.08 30 2 57 0 13.7 0.23 1.73 0.17 38 584 2000 13 14 18 0 0 0 23 1 58 0 8.27 0.14 1.01 0.1 39 584 2000 12 12 16 0 0 0 20 1 58 0 7.35 0.12 0.86 0.09 40 584 2000 14 14 19 0 0 0 23 1 58 0 8.34 0.13 0.95 0.09 47 2446 6900 16 16 23 0 2 0.03 138 6 99 0 82.5 0.41 1.67 0.43 48 2404 6900 67 67 94 0 7 0.01 561 25 99 0 262 1.24 5 1.34 49 2952 6900 32 32 48 0 5 0.05 266 15 98 0 172 1.15 6.53 1.27 50 1063 4000 25 26 32 0 0 0.11 69 4 46 0 19.8 0.14 0.33 0.06 51 1063 4000 5 9 10 0 0 0.2 15 1 29 0 15.9 0.14 0.26 0.03 52 2264 4000 20 21 34 0 2 0.1 68 7 56 0 41.1 0.27 0.73 0.14 53 2255 4000 18 19 31 0 2 0 62 6 57 0 35.2 0.23 0.58 0.12 54 2239 4000 12 12 20 0 1 0.03 40 4 57 0 22.7 0.15 0.36 0.08 55 2591 5700 61 63 97 0 10 0.01 360 26 67 0 171 1.1 3.06 0.72 56 1943 5700 4 5 7 0 0 0.03 27 1 61 0 23.2 0.18 0.6 0.09 57 543 2000 4 5 6 0 0 0.04 7 0 55 0 4.77 0.06 0.41 0.04 58 543 2000 6 6 8 0 0 0.02 10 0 56 0 3.67 0.05 0.31 0.03 59 332 2000 10 12 12 0 0 0.05 17 0 49 0 7.18 0.07 0.33 0.03 61 529 2000 15 168 132 0 13 1.42 17 14 3 0 43.9 0.52 0.49 0.02 62 870 2000 5 5 8 0 0 0.01 9 0 55 0 5.07 0.06 0.35 0.04 63 864 2000 6 7 9 0 0 0 10 0 56 0 5.56 0.06 0.36 0.04 NOBLDI2.WK4 10/13/97 rm I T 7 AMERICAN AIRLINES ARENA 3. Utility Plan American Airlines Arena Major Use Special Permit Site Drainage, Utility, and Solid Waste Study 1. Drainage A. Drainage Area The Arena, Site "A", is roughly rectangular in shape and is located between Port Boulevard and the planned extension of NE 8th Street, and from Biscayne Boulevard East to Site "B." (Site "B" is located between the Arena, Site "A" and Biscayne Bay.) There are approximately 605 feet of frontage along the Site "B" side and approximately 1030 feet along the North property line. The overall Arena, Site "A" is approximately 14.63 acres in size. After development of the Arena, approximately 61 % of the site will be impervious and approximately 39% of the site will be designated as open areas. The impervious area includes, in addition to the roadways, approximately 3.50 acres of roofing and approximately 5.00 acres of terraces and pedestrian areas. B. Existing Drainage System The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) maintains the drainage system for the abutting roadways (i.e. Biscayne Blvd. and Port Boulevard.) The existing roadways will not be significantly impacted by this development and can handle the present conditions. There is an existing exfiltration system on the site that consists of a series of inlet/catch basins and limerock trench, which will be removed during the construction phase of the Arena. C. Proposed Drainage System The on -site drainage systems will be reviewed by the Metropolitan Dade County Environmental Resource Management Department (DERM) and the City of Miami Public Works Department. The off -site drainage system will be reviewed by the FDOT. The intent of the drainage design is to discharge the stormwater runoff, not requiring pretreatment, directly into Biscayne Bay, without affecting any of the existing roadway drainage systems. The design requirement for the on -site drainage system is governed by DERM's design policies and best management practices. Pawa Complex Int'I Inc. Page 1 11/11/97 American Airlines Arena Major Use Special Permit Site Drainage, Utility, and Solid Waste Study In general, the stormwater runoff will be collected through a system of catch basin/inlets and transported by a network of pipes to the discharge locations. The various drainage areas can be divided into subsystems that either require pretreatment or that can directly discharged into the Bay or that are self-contained exfiltration systems. 1. DERM requires that the first one (1) inch of stormwater volume be pre- treated for the landscaped and roadway areas prior, to allowing the discharge of the remainder of the stormwater runoff into the Bay. The pretreatment method will consist of a 15-feet deep and 3.5-feet wide limerock exfiltration trench system designed in accordance to the Dade County Public Works Manual. See Table No 1 for the exfiltration trench calculation. 2. The pedestrian and terrace areas on the South side of the centerline of the Arena are designed to allow the stormwater run-off to be discharged into the Bay after any sediment and debris is separate out from the flow by means of a grit chamber. 3. The roof area drainage system is designed to have the stormwater run- off directly discharged to the Bay, along the North side of the site. 4. The elevated roadways immediately adjacent to the arena building on the North side and pedestrian and terrace areas on the North side of the centerline of the Arena are designed to have self-contained exfiltration systems. These exfiltration systems will be located underneath the parking garage slab and will take advantage of superior soil percolation values. The exfiltration trench will be constructed as a shallow system, with the flow line of the pipe located above the water table. This design will function by providing for immediate storage capacity of the stormwater in the piping and the hydraulic head from the elevated roadway will cause the exfiltration system to percolate into the exfiltration trench. Pawa Complex Int'I Inc. Page 2 1 1/11/97 American Airlines Arena Major Use Special Permit Site Drainage, Utility, and Solid Waste Study Table 1 Stormwater Calculations Runoff Generation Figures & Calculations 11. Total Pervious (Grass) Area (A) 5.42 Acres 2. Total Impervious (Pavement) Area (A) 9.21 Acres (Credit for the Roof & Arena North-6.0 Acres) 3. Average Runoff Coefficient © 0.871 a) Previous Area C Factor of 0.3 b) Impervious Area C Factor of 0.9 4. Design Storm 5. Time of Concentration (T) 6. Rainfall Intensity (1) 7. Peak Runoff Q = CIA 10 Year Return Frequency 10 Minutes 6.6 Inch/Hour 66.2 CFS 8. DOT Trench Calculation Factors a. K =6.29 x(-10E4) b. Ds=10.ft c. Du=3.5ft d. H2=5.Oft e. W= 4.0ft f. Safety Factor=2 g. Pipe Size 24" Dia. 9. Required Trench Length Calculated 400 Feet Pawa Complex Int'I Inc. Page 3 1 1/11/97 American Airlines Arena Major Use Special Permit Site Drainage, Utility, and Solid Waste Study 2 Utilities A. Easements Dade County will own the entire arena site and Utility Easements are not required. The water meter & backflow preventor, double detector check valve (ddcv) are located on the South West corner of the site (loading area) close to Biscayne Blvd, to reduce the line length of Miami -Dade Water and Sewer Department's (MDWASD) owned and maintained on -site utility mains. The remainder of the utility system, beyond the water meter and ddcv, will be treated as a private fire supply main. The internal sanitary sewer collection system will be a private system. The Arena, under a maintenance contract, will maintain the private utility systems. The external utility system will be maintained by MDWASD. B. Water Distribution System. The MDWASD owns and operates a variety of mains along Biscayne Blvd adjacent to the site. The water distribution system will be designed as a looped system providing for both fire protection and domestic water demands. The closest water distribution line to the site is a twelve-(12) inch diameter main at the edge of the existing sidewalk along the East right-of- way line of Biscayne Blvd. A fire flow test was performed on October 3, 1997, by the MFD on this twelve-(12) inch diameter main and the test indicated a total available flow at 20 PSI of 5526 GPM. (The calculated requirements for the Arena are a fire flow of 1250 GPM and an estimated domestic demand of 1200 GPM.) This twelve-(12) inch diameter main satisfies both the domestic and fire protection requirements. The design includes an eight-(8) inch diameter water meter with by-pass assembly along with an above grade reduced -pressure zone backflow- preventor device on the domestic water service connection and an above grade eight-(8) inch diameter ddcv on the building sprinkler system connection to protect the public water supply from possible contamination. The fire hydrants are located at approximately 250 feet intervals and within 100 feet of the building's siamese connections. Pawa Complex Int'I Inc. Page 4 1 1/11/97 American Airlines Arena Major Use Special Permit Site Drainage, Utility, and Solid Waste Study B. Sanitary Sewer Collection and Transmission System. The MDWASD (Utility) owns and operates a variety of mains and facilities along Biscayne Blvd. adjacent to the site. The sanitary sewage flow is estimated at a total peak load of 1150 GPM. The Utility analyzed the Arena's flows and determined that there was sufficient capacity in this existing system to accept this sanitary flow. There are several alternative methods that can be used to connect the Arena's sanitary sewer to the Utility's public system. These methods are currently under a value engineering study and include: Method 1. This design alternative is for a gravity sewer connection to the existing Pump Station No. 2 (PS 2), located just south of NE loth Street, along the East side of Biscayne Blvd. This method would have the Arena's internal sewage system, as it exits the structure, split evenly between discharge pipes located along Biscayne Blvd. on the North West corner and the South West corners of the site. The sanitary pipes are then connected with a manhole and gravity flowed North along the West side of the site. The combined flow then continues North off -site, within an existing 27-foot wide easement along the East side of Biscayne Blvd., to PS 2. The tie-in to PS 2 will be made using an existing manhole constructed above the 72-inch interceptor sewage line. Method 2. This design alternative is for a gravity sewer connection to an existing 27-inch diameter Vetrified Clay Pipe sewer along the Western side of Biscayne Blvd. This method would also include the combining of the Arena's sanitary sewer pipes and then making a single crossing of Biscayne Blvd and connecting to the 27-inch diameter pipe by means of a new manhole. Method 3. This design alternative is for the construction of a grinder pump station at each of the Arena's two (2) discharge pipes and then connecting by means of a service saddle to an existing 42-inch or 48-inch diameter sanitary force main along the East side of Biscayne Blvd. Pawa Complex Int'I Inc. Page 5 11/1 1/97 American Airlines Arena Major Use Special Permit Site Drainage, Utility, and Solid Waste Study 3 Solid Waste Generation Solid waste generated by this project will be collected in standard on -site combination compactor/34 yard disposal bin. Recyclables will be sorted and collected in standard on -site containers. Regular pick-up service will be provided by either private hauling companies and/or the City of Miami Solid Waste Department, who will transport the waste to Metro -Dade County's Disposal or Recycling Facility. The projected volumes of solid waste generation are shown on Table 2, Below Table 2 Solid Waste Generation Full House Event Basketball Mode 20,000 Patrons Waste Generation Per Patron Per Event 0.375 lbs. Per Event Basketball Mode 7,500 lbs. Per Event Uncompacted Volume 7,5000 lbs./100 lbs./cy = 75 cy Compacted Volume 75 cy @ 4:1 ratio = 18.75 cy NB: Recyclable Average 20% of Volume Created Pawa Complex Int'I Inc. Page 6 1 1/11/97 I 33 3 { i' YV I ��r P AMERICAN AIRLINES ARENA 4. Economic Impact Analysis s � Pi F' I r S, + ,� 'F'! ►��'�` 14 +►�� 41 � I low ,. MIAMI HEAT & NEW ARENA ECONOMIC IMPACT ANALYSIS October, 1997 Presented by: Price Waterhouse LLP 400 N. Ashley Street, Suite 2800 Tampa, FL 33602 Phone: (813) 223-7577 Fax: (813) 222-7008 Contact: David C. Petersen, Managing Director Robert V. Canton, Senior Manager Price «ateMouse LLP Price Waterhouse LLP October 13, 1997 Sammy Schulman Vice PresidenVCFO Basketball Properties, Inc. 1 SE Third Avenue, Suite 2300 Miami, FL 33131 Dear Mr. Schulman: (4 Price Waterhouse LLP is pleased to provide this final report which presents an update of our .tune 1996 report entitled Miami HEAT & New Arena Economic Impact Analysis. This analysis is based on the proposed work program, estimates and assumptions from previous studies, information developed from supplemental research, knowledge of the industry and other sources, including certain information that you provided. These sources of information and bases of significant estimates and assumptions are stated in our report. All estimates of the proposed arena's development costs, events, attendance, and NBA spending characteristics were provided to Price Waterhouse by the Miami HEAT and analyzed for reasonableness as part of a prior engagement in which we provided an independent analysis of the sales tax revenue that would be produced by a new arena. Some assumptions made herein, inevitably will not materialize and unanticipated events and circumstances may occur, therefore, actual results will vary from the estimates, and the variations may be material. Further, we neither evaluated management's effectiveness nor are responsible for future marketing efforts and other management actions upon which actual results will depend. We have no obligation to revise the report to reflect events or conditions which occur subsequent to the date of the report However, we will be available to discuss the necessity for revision in view of changes in the economic or market factors affecting the project. This report is intended for the information of the person or persons to whom it is addressed, solely for the purposes stated herein and should not be relied upon for any other purpose. Neither this report nor its contents, nor any reference to Price Waterhouse LLP may be included or quoted in any offering circular or registration statement, prospectus, sales brochure, appraisal, advertisement, loan, or other agreement or documentation without prior written consent. Our services did not include ascertaining the legal and regulatory requirements applicable to the proposed project, including zoning, other state and local government regulations, Mr. Schulman October 13, 1997 Page 2 permits, and licenses. Further, no effort was made to determine the possible effect on this project of present or future federal, state or local legislation, including any bond restrictions, environmental or ecological matters, interpretations thereof or subsurface conditions. Price Waterhouse does not, as part of its economic and financial analyses, perform an audit, review or examination (as defined by the AICPA) of any of the historical or future estimated financial information, and therefore does not express any opinion with regard to same. Sincerely, David C. Petersen MIAMI HEAT AND NEW ARENA ECONOMIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Table of Contents 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND INTRODUCTION.........................................................................1 II. ECONOMIC IMPACT OF THE MIAMI HEAT..............................................................................5 III. QUALITATIVE IMPACTS OF THE MIAMI HEAT...................................................................... 9 IV. NBA TRENDS..........................................................................................................................14 APPENDIXA ............. ............... ................................ .......... ......... .......... ........ .................... ......... A-1 APPENDIXB.............................................................................................................................. B-1 I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND INTRODUCTION Executive Summary The following is a summary of the key findings from this economic impact analysis. All amounts are presented in 1997 dollars. The full report must be read in its entirety to obtain the background methodology and assumptions underlying the study's findings. • This economic impact analysis is based on impacts of construction and operation of a new major multi -use entertainment facility in downtown Miami and the potential loss to the City of Miami and Dade County which could result from a relocation of the Miami HEAT to a nearby county within the metropolitan area that would be accessible to current HEAT fans. • The annual direct spending related to the Miami HEAT in a new arena is estimated at $87 million within the City of Miami and Dade County. This spending consists of spectator purchases of tickets, concessions and merchandise within the proposed arena; out -of -arena spending at hotels, restaurants and other establishments, and other team related expenditures on premium seating, advertising, and naming rights. • Total annual sales (direct, indirect and induced) generated by this direct spending are estimated at $98 million for the City of Miami and $141 million for Dade County. • Total jobs generated as a result of these sales are estimated at 1,200 and 1,800 for the City of Miami and Dade County, respectively. Annual eamings (wages) are estimated at $87 million for the City of Miami and $103 million for Dade County. • During the construction phase, an estimated $103 million in sales is anticipated to be generated in the City of Miami and approximately $237 million in Dade County. Total eamings generated are estimated at $26 million in the City and $71 million in the County during the building period. Construction of the new arena would create approximately 900 jobs in the City and 2,500 in the County. • The publicity and positive image a community receives by having an NBA franchise are believed by many to be valuable to a community. In a typical year a team's games may be broadcast on local and regional television and radio stations and national network broadcasts (NBC, TNT). Game scores, major player transactions and other team and player related events are reported over these same media outlets as well as printed in local newspapers. • A community's status as a "NBA city" may also provide another non -quantifiable economic benefit to the community such as extended length of stay for visitors. Business travelers, convention and trade show delegates, and tourists may be inclined to extend their stay in the local area if they have an opportunity to attend a HEAT game. • The HEAT franchise and individual team members are involved in several local and statewide charitable and community organizations. They contribute time and monetary support to many causes which benefit the state and the local community. • According to representatives of other cities, a new arena, performing arts center and other developments can serve as an "anchor" for redevelopment throughout the surrounding -1- communities. Areas in Miami adjacent to the proposed location of the new arena include Park West and Overtown. Introduction Common motives for public sector involvement in the development of professional sports venues include attracting ancillary development, providing visitors or customers for local merchants, luring a professional sports franchise, and retaining existing franchises. The Miami Arena, located in downtown Miami, is the current home of the National Basketball Association's HEAT. The Arena was built in 1988 with 15,200 seats and 16 suites and does not contain modem spectator and revenue -producing amenities which are available at newer facilities. Development and operation of a new arena with an NBA franchise would have a quantifiable impact on the City of Miami and Dade County, Florida. The franchise has evaluated several options related to a new arena, including potentially relocating the team from Miami to a facility in a nearby county within the metropolitan area which is still accessible to HEAT fans. The purpose of this evaluation is to measure the impacts of development and operation of a new home arena for the HEAT on Dade County and the City of Miami and to illustrate the potential economic loss to the City of Miami and Dade County which could result from the team's departure. Price Waterhouse LLP (PW) was engaged by the HEAT to prepare this analysis of the economic impact of the NBA franchise and new arena on the City of Miami and Dade County. The analysis is based on estimates of attendance, spending per capita (i.e. tickets, food and beverage, merchandise and parking), and other arena operating characteristics provided by the HEAT for a new arena downtown. This report assesses specific characteristics and information used to quantify the economic impact of the proposed Arena on the City of Miami and Dade County. The analysis includes the following sections: I. Executive Summary and Introduction II, Economic Impact of the HEAT 111. Qualitative Impacts of the HEAT IV. NBA Trends The proposed new arena is to contain approximately 20,000 seats, including 20 luxury boxes, four floor -level star suites, 68 loges or open boxes with an amenities package comparable to luxury boxes, and 292 courtside lounge seats with access to a lounge area. It is our understanding that the star suites are being marketed primarily to major team sponsors and that Dade County has pledged to assist with the marketing of these suites. The new arena has been sited in downtown Miami as part of the Maritime Park development. Dade County is seeking to purchase approximately 80 acres of waterfront land, south of Interstate 395, to implement the Maritime Park Master Plan. In the plan's first phase, a proposed new arena for the HEAT will be constructed, along with a pedestrian bridge linking the arena to Bayside Marketplace and a parking garage. The County has the option to develop 70,000 square feet of retail space east of the arena; however, it is unlikely that this development will be completed by the opening of the arena. -2- In the second phase of the Master Plan, the County is to acquire the land north of the arena to potentially develop an additional 120,000 to 150,000 square feet of retail space, a museum, a public park and two cruise ship terminals with a central pier which could accommodate a hotel. 11 is uncertain, however, whether Dade County will be in a position to pursue this additional land for these proposed developments. Several infrastructure improvement projects are also slated for the area to improve access to the City of Miami's downtown and the Maritime Park site. Additionally, construction of a performing arts center has been proposed for the site north of Maritime Park. The Maritime Park site is adjacent to Bayside Marketplace, an outdoor waterfront retail and entertainment center which opened in 1987. The two-story open-air mall contains a mix of retail, restaurant and entertainment tenants. The development is anchored by a Hard Rock Cam and several well -established retailers such as The Disney Store, The Gap, Sharper Image, The Limited and a Warner Bros. store. Restaurants and bars currently have extended nighttime hours, which could attract HEAT fans attending games at the arena. The development also includes a marina. To fully capitalize on the potential spending by HEAT fans at Bayside, in terms of sales before and after games, direct, convenient and safe pedestrian access to Bayside is necessary. According to information provided by the HEAT, a pedestrian bridge linking the mall and new arena is planned for development concurrently with the facility. This report does not address the economic impact of Bayside, but evaluates spending on restaurants, retail, and entertainment by attendees to HEAT games which may be spent at Bayside or other retail, restaurant and entertainment establishments. Furthermore, this analysis does not address the economic impact which would be generated by additional cruise ships, retail or other developments within this corridor of downtown Miami. Economic impacts of the project are estimated utilizing the IMPLAN econometric model. An explanation of this model and the methodology utilized to estimate the impacts of the proposed new Arena on the City and the County are provided in the Appendix. The initlai direct impact of a new arena and franchise on the City of Miami and Dade County may be estimated in terms of. • Spending within the arena by spectatorstfans to sporting events (tickets, food and beverage, merchandise, parking, premium seating areas, etc.); • Spending outside the arena at local restaurants, hotels and other establishments before and after the event; and • Spending resulting from or related to the operations of the sports franchise (such as administrative costs, advertising and corporate support) and other uses of funds derived from naming rights and sponsorships. As a result of these initial direct spending impacts, secondary economic impacts are also generated which can be quantified. These impacts are measured in terms of • Total sales or output — initial direct impacts plus the impact of the second and subsequent rounds of spending or "multiplier" effects which cumulatively increase total sales in the community/metro area; -3- • Employment — the direct and indirect jobs which are created as a result of the direct and indirect spending described above; and • Earnings — created by the jobs supported by the direct and indirect spending described above. The non -recurring impact on sales, earnings and employment during the construction of the proposed Arena is also analyzed. - In addition to these quantifiable economic impacts, other non -quantifiable intangible or qualitative impacts also result from an NBA franchise and arena including: • Incremental community advertising/name recognition resulting from television and radio broadcasting, print media and recognition as an NBA city; • Potential for an extended length of stay for tourists and other visitors attending games; • Potential benefit to residents by providing additional entertainment options; and • Potential amenity to prospective corporate relocations or expansions. Publicity and the positive image a community receives by having a NBA franchise are believed valuable by many community leaders throughout the country. Additionally, in a typical year the teams' games may be broadcast on local and regional television and radio stations and national broadcasts (NBC, TNT). Team scores, major player transactions and other team and player related events are also reported over these same broadcast lines as well as printed in local newspapers. Exposure to national and even international audiences could grow with introduction of technologies such as next generation home satellite systems offering 500 television channels, interactive television, the Internet and other forms of distribution which will offer fans unique ways to follow their favorite teams and players. The "Dream Team" participation in the 1996 Summer Olympic Games in Atlanta, following their 1992 participation, increased the international exposure to basketball, as have successful marketing programs initiated by the NBA. Basketball games played by NBA teams are now watched in more than 170 nations. International support for the NBA has culminated in the addition of two Canadian expansion teams, the Toronto Raptors and Vancouver Grizzlies. In addition, the new Women's National Basketball Association play may increase attention and fan support for the game. ME 11. ECONOMIC IMPACT OF THE MIAMI HEAT This section provides estimates of the economic impact of the HEAT on the City of Miami and Dade County. Related economic impacts, including in -arena and out -of -arena spending, other team/arena related expenditures, construction expenditures and multiplier effects are presented in 1997 dollars. A detailed explanation of the concepts and methodology utilized is provided in the Appendix. Economic impacts are generated from new spending that is imported into a community as a result of some activity, such as HEAT games and other entertainment events at an arena, which attracts nonresidents. Local residents would also spend dollars on these activities, however their expenditures may by displaced since it is likely they would have spent their dollars elsewhere in the City of Miami and Dade County. Impact analysis excludes this "displaced spending" by residents. However, if "entertainment dollars" spent by local residents on HEAT events would otherwise have been used for activities outside the loical area, (the team playing its home games in a neighboring county), then these dollars do not merely represent displaced spending, but rather lost spending. Thus, both spending generated from non-residents due to the existence of the facility and the HEAT, and resident spending which would be lost if the team were moved within the region, are included in the determination of the total economic impact of the team and venue. In the case of a relocation of the HEAT to a nearby county, all spending has an impact. The City of Miami and Dade County would potentially lose the economic impact generated by the franchise. Direct spending from fans and corporations located outside Dade County would be spent in another county. Additionally, residents and corporations of Miami and Dade County would continue to spend dollars on HEAT games in and around a new facility within the metropolitan area, thereby shifting local dollars out of the area and into a neighboring county. The goal of this analysis is to quantify this potential loss to Miami and Dade County. Direct Erects The combined direct effect of in -arena, out -of -arena and other team/arena related spending for the City and County is summarized in the following table. Total Direct Spending Spending Cary In -Arena $35,000,000 Other Team/Arena Related 46,000,000 Spending Outside the Arena 6,000,000 Total Direct Spending $87,000,000 The estimated $87 million represents the first round of economic impact generated by the HEAT. It is important to note, however, that not all of this spending is anticipated to remain in the City or County. For example, expenditures such as salaries of players who do not reside year-round in the area, league dues, team travel to other cities and other costs are immediately withdrawn from the local area. This "leakage" of first round expenditures has been accounted for in the "multiplier effect" described later in this section. -5- The following sections explain each of the spending categories summarized above. In Arena Spending NBA attendees make expenditures on various commodities including admissions, concessions, merchandise and parking. In order to estimate direct in -arena spending on these items, estimates of attendance and arena per capita expenditures, provided by the HEAT, were utilized. Per capita spending estimates in a new arena were applied to estimated attendance levels to calculate total direct in -arena spending. For purposes of this analysis an estimated 16,700 actual attendance to NBA games in a stabilized year was employed. This estimate is consistent with historical attendance and attendance for teams in new arenas. Estimated total attendance for regular season and preseason games of approximately 735,000 was utilized. Total in -arena direct spending is estimated at approximately $35 million for tickets, concessions, merchandise sales and parking during HEAT games. Other Team and Arena Related Spending Other team and arena related spending includes: • Premium seating opportunities including box suites, loges and courtside lounge seating for local fans and corporations; • Broadcast revenues from television and radio contracts to air HEAT events; • The sale of naming rights to the proposed arena; • New advertising opportunities in and around the arena; and • Visiting team expenditures on lodging, meals and other items within the City and County. Based on information provided by the HEAT, these items are estimated to generate approximately $46 million annually in direct expenditures within the City of Miami and Dade County. Out -of -Arena Spending Out -of -arena expenditures consist of spending made by spectators before and after a game in nearby restaurant, retail, entertainment, and other establishments. For purposes of this analysis, out -of -arena spending estimates were based on an evaluation of studies previously conducted for existing, new or proposed professional venues and an assessment of the proximity of the proposed site for the new arena to pre- and post -game spending opportunities. The accessibility of retail, restaurant and entertainment options nearby an arena increase the likelihood that fans will engage in pre- and post -game spending. Provided extended hours are offered during the season and pedestrian access is arranged between the mail and the arena, Bayside may attract some of this spending from attendees to HEAT games and accordingly out -of -arena expenditures should accrue to companies within the immediate vicinity of the arena. Based on this evaluation, an estimated per attendee spending of $8.00 was utilized. Applying this per attendee spending to attendance estimates previously discussed generates a total direct out - of -arena effect of approximately $6 million for the City and County. Multipliers The multipliers utilized to calculate indirect and total spending generated from the initial round of direct expenditures are provided in the following table. Multipliers were utilized for various industries for each of the three economic impact categories: sales, earnings and employment. Multipliers for Dade County Industry Sales' Income Employment3 Hotels and Lodging Places 2.16 0.94 42.51 Commercial Sports 1.47 1.24 17.63 Amusement and Recreation 2.45 0.88 51.37 Eating and Drinking Places 2.47 0.98 51.06 Aggregate Retail 2.38 1.02 49.27 Interurban Transportation 1.89 0.90 35.28 Advertising 2.26 0.91 44.01 Other Business Services 1.89 0.64 28.65 New Commercial Buildings 1.88 0.56 21.44 'Ratio of total sales generated from $1.00 of direct spending. 2Rabo of total earnings (income, salaries, etc.) from $1.00 of direct spending. 3Ratio of jobs generated from $1,000,000 in sales. These multipliers are the same as those used in our 1996 report. Direct spending adjustments form the basis of the update in this report, rather than any change in the multipliers from 1996 to 1997. As these multipliers were developed for Dade County, they were adjusted to estimate the economic benefits to the City of Miami. It is assumed that 100 percent of direct effects, but only a portion of indirect effects, are realized in the City of Miami. An analysis of economic and demographic characteristics suggests that the City of Miami represents approximately 20 percent of the economic activity in Dade County. These statistics include total population, total effective buying income and sales from retail and eating and drinking establishments for both the City and County. Thus, the city impact was calculated by adjusting the Dade County multipliers to reflect a 20 percent share of indirect benefits accruing to the City of Miami. Indirect Effects Direct spending generates expenditures in sectors of the economy which purchase goods and services from tither sectors. This cycle is captured by the multiplier effect. The multipliers were applied to the direct spending estimates using the IMPLAN econometric model. The total annual indirect effect (in 1997 dollars) from the HEAT is estimated at $11 million for the City of Miami and $54 million for Dade County. Total Impact The sum of direct and indirect impacts reveals a total impact of the HEAT on the City of Miami and Dade County. This impact is provided in terms of sales, personal income and employment. In terms of total sales, the HEAT, with the proposed Arena, would generate approximately $98 million and $141 million for the City and County respectively. Again, all amounts are annual impacts, expressed in 1997 dollars. -7- The effect of the HEAT on total earnings is estimated at approximately $87 million within the City of Miami and $103 million within Dade County. Total sales generated by operating the proposed arena for the HEAT would support approximately 1,200 jobs to the City of Miami and 1,800 jobs to Dade County. These impacts are summarized in the following table. Total Economic Impact City of Miami Dade County Direct Spending $87,000,000 $87,000,000 Total Sales $98,000,000 $141,000,000 Earnings $87,000,000 $103,000,000 Employment 1,200 1,800 Construction Period Economic Impact In addition to economic impacts generated annually from arena operations, the City and County would receive non -recurring economic benefits from construction activities associated with developing the proposed Arena. These impacts can be measured as the changes in sales volume, employment and income that occur during the two-year construction period. According to information provided by the HEAT, hard (materials and labor), soft (architectural and engineering fees, furniture, fixtures, etc.) and other development costs for the proposed Arena are expected to total $176 million. However, some of these expenditures would occur outside Dade County and the City of Miami. According to discussions with Basketball Properties, analysis of other economic impact studies and additional research, it was estimated that approximately 72 percent of construction costs would be spent in Dade County and 50 percent within the City of Miami. Based on these estimates, non -recurring economic impacts in 1997 dollars for the City and County are shown in the following table. Construction Period Economic Impact City of Miami Dade County Construction Cost $176,000,000 $176,000,000 Direct Spending $88,000,000 $126,000.000 Total Sales $103.000,000 $237,000,000 Earnings $26,000,000 $71,000,000 Employment 900 2,500 During the construction phase, an estimated $103 million in sales would be generated in the City of Miami and approximately $237 million in Dade County. Total earnings generated are estimated at $26 million in the City and $71 million in the County during the building period. Construction of a new arena would create approximately 900 jobs in the City and 2,500 jobs in the County. These non -recurring total impacts were estimated by multiplying the New Commercial Buildings multipliers to the estimated cost of constructing the proposed Arena, for estimated direct expenditures to occur in the City of Miami and Dade County. N I11. QUALITATIVE IMPACTS OF THE MIAMI HEAT National Image Publicity and positive image a community receives by having an NBA franchise are believed by many to justify a public subsidy for an arena needed to host the teams. In a typical year each team's games may be broadcast on local, regional and national network television broadcasts and radio stations. Game scores, major player transactions and other team and player related events are reported over these same media outlets as well as printed in local newspapers. Exposure to national and even international fan bases could grow with introduction of technologies such as next generation home satellite systems, interactive television, the Internet and other forms of distribution which will offer fans unique ways to follow their favorite teams and players. These technological advances, and the 'Dream Team's" participation in the 1992 and 1996 Summer Olympic games, have already increased international exposure for basketball. According to industry publications, NBA games were watched in more than 170 nations during the 1995-96 season. These international fans also show their support by purchasing NBA merchandise, making up $350 million of the $3 billion NBA gross retail sales in the 1995 season. Exposure to basketball may also increase with the new Women's National Basketball Association league. One of the benefits of exposure as home to an NBA team is that it may be a factor in a major corporation's decision in selecting locations to build or expand their operations. Although corporations evaluate a number of critical issues when selecting a community (such as availability of a qualified work force, proximity to an international airport, sophisticated telecommunications and tranquil labor-management relations prior to relocating), the presence of an NBA team provides an additional amenity that only a few cities posses. This status may also provide another tangible economic benefit to the community such as extended length of stay for visitors. Business travelers, convention and trade show delegates and tourists may be inclined to extend their stay in the local area if they have an opportunity to attend a HEAT game. Community Activities The franchise and individual members of the team are involved in several local and statewide charitable organizations. They contribute time and monetary support to many causes which benefit the state and local community. The following is a summary of some of these activities. Miami HEAT Some of the community involvement of the HEAT include: • The Miami HEAT Charitable Fund raised more than $450,000 from a HEAT Family Festival ($360,000) and in -game silent auctions ($90,000). These funds benefited several charitable organizations, such as: • University of Miami Pediatric Mobile Clinic • Junior Achievement • Dade and Broward Counties School Systems • Jackson Memorial Children's Ward • Make -A -Wish Foundation • Miami HEAT Scholarship for Kids • Children's Caring Cancer Center • Dade County Public Libraries • United Way • Big Brothers and Big Sisters • Boys and Girls Clubs of Miami • Miami HEAT Wheels • An additional 100 local South Florida charities received support from the HEAT Charitable Fund, totaling over $100,000. The team also donated more than $400,000 in merchandise (autographed basketballs, jerseys, posters) to assist the fundraising efforts of local charities. • The HEAT and team members encourage students to take advantage of their educational opportunities. During the 1996 season the HEAT teamed up with the Dade County Public Libraries to promote reading by encouraging students to sign up for a library card. In addition, the HEAT participates in the NBA's Team Up program that advocates attendance at school and volunteerism within the community. • Each season the HEAT offers $15,000 in scholarships to high school students who plan to attend four-year universities. Scholarships are awarded based on academic achievement, community service work and one for journalism. • Team members participate in and sponsor activities that benefit the homeless and children. Each Thanksgiving and Christmas, the HEAT donates gifts and food to homeless shelters, visits children at Miami's Children's Hospital, and conducts a toy drive throughout the community. Additionally, each year the HEAT grants wishes for children through the Make -A - Wish Foundation and participates in the program's fundraising activities. • The HEAT supports several outreach programs for social and health related issues such as AIDS, domestic violence, and drug awareness. Last season HEAT members teamed up with the Miami Coalition, a drug -free agency , to encourage children to avoid drug use. • Each year the HEAT offers a three-week basketball summer camp for youth. The team also sponsors a golf tournament benefiting the Junior Achievement which raised $75,000 this past year. Anchor for Redevelopment As local officials plan revitalization efforts in their cities, they often seek ways to attract businesses and residents back to the central city area. Several cities have incorporated construction of convention centers, arenas and professional sports stadiums into their development plan. Such projects can prompt further development for other public and private projects which make a community more attractive. In downtown Miami, proposals for a new arena for the HEAT, other developments within Maritime Park, such as retail space, cruise ship terminals and a proposed performing arts center, and other public and private projects which enhance pedestrian safety may impact adjacent neighborhoods such as Park West and Overtown. -10- The following case studies highlight the effect of professional sports venues (arenas and stadiums) and their impact on surrounding communities. Gund Arena Gund Arena, located in downtown Cleveland, is adjacent to the new Jacobs Field which, together comprise Gateway Sports Complex. City officials report that the arena and other Gateway developments have spurred a revitalization of the surrounding area. On pre- and post- game days, hotel occupancy is reportedly higher at hotels in the area, depending on team performance and ticket availability. Hotel officials believe that Cavaliers basketball, as an attractive entertainment option, helps to attract association meetings and conferences to Cleveland. A City official also reported increase in property values since the opening of the Gund Arena. On game -days, business increases at arena -area restaurants, according to management. They also receive increased patronage from Indians fans on baseball game days. About a half -dozen restaurants opened to coincide with the arena's opening season. Target Center The Target Center arena, opened in 1990, is home to the Minnesota Timberwolves and is located in the Warehouse District adjacent to the center of downtown Minneapolis. According to local officials, the Target Center contributed to bringing retail customers back to the downtown area. Restaurant management in establishments near the Target Center report that sales increase significantly on game days. Restaurants also state that business remains stable on non -game days and on the off-season. The Warehouse District is a vibrant entertainment area in the Twin Cities area. Since the Target Center opened, it has been reported that several new restaurants and night clubs have opened in the Warehouse District, in close proximity to the arena. It was also reported that while property values in the Central Business District of Minneapolis have declined in the past several years, the majority of the Warehouse District has increased in property value during the same penod. America West Arena America West Arena, home of the NBA Phoenix Suns and NHL Coyotes, opened in June 1992. According to local officials, an effort to reverse the suburban sprawl was one reason civic leaders and Suns management opted to construct the arena on 11 acres in downtown Phoenix. The arena has functioned as a key component in the continuing effort to attract visitors to the downtown area. Former Phoenix Suns player Dan Majerte opened his Sports Grill in 1993, and its success has sparked other restaurant developers to follow suit During America West's first year of operation, many new retail and restaurant licenses were issued for business development in downtown Phoenix. Although the NBA and NHL games are major sources of customers, these restaurants also cater to a large lunchtime crowd from the nearby Arizona Center office complex. Ancillary business is derived from convention center and symphony hall patrons and those attending indoor soccer and other minor-league events at the Arena. With Major League Baseball on the way (the new ballpark to be located next to America West), its a real "land rush" for real -11- estate on the periphery, according to one local merchant. Oriole Park at Camden Yards Oriole Park at Camden Yards was built in downtown Baltimore and opened in 1992. The stadium is part of a master plan for a large parcel (formerly a railroad yard), where the State is constructing a football stadium. The site was chosen because of its proximity to the Inner Harbor area which features the National Aquarium, convention center, retail shops, hotels and restaurants. According to city officials, Oriole Park and other amenities work together to make downtown Baltimore more attractive to business owners and visitors alike. Several hotels in the vicinity of Camden Yards confirmed that baseball -related patronage increases their sales. Further, managers at area restaurants state that their sales definitely increase due to spending before and after games. City officials also point out that, following the 1994 strike, Oriole Park is once again selling out virtually every game, and area merchants are benefiting from the crowds. Coors Field Coors Field is located in Denver within a 25-square block historic district known as lower downtown. The location of Coors Field, according to local officials, has had a positive impact on development and existing businesses in the vicinity of the park. According to local hotel officials, out-of-town baseball fans, media and visiting teams have contributed to increased occupancy at hotels in the vicinity of the arena. SkyDome SkyDome is located in downtown Toronto. It is a major anchor for an expanding entertainment district which today encompasses numerous restaurants, theaters, nightclubs and the convention center. Because of its location within this distract, area businesses do not rely exclusively on Blue Jays' spectators. The volume of activity remains fairly constant, on baseball and football (CFQ game days and in the off-season. Property taxes have increased in the area in recent years, but this is largely due to neighborhood revitalization rather than the proximity of SkyDome, according to area merchants. The Ballpark in Arlington The Ballpark in Arlington was completed prior to the Texas Rangers' 1994 season. In the city's master plan for the area, the Ballpark in Arlington is the centerpiece of a commercial and entertainment district consisting of a proposed festival retail area, a plaza of specialized eating establishments, and an amphitheater. Development of these ancillary amenities has been on hold, however, and many visitors to the Ballpark currently travel approximately one mile away to find the city's main concentration of existing restaurants. Game -day visitors account for a large portion of business, pre- and post -game, according to a local restaurant manager. But Cowboys football (Texas Stadium is located in nearby Irving) and -12- other Texas -based sporting events also attract clientele. On non -game -days during the summer, restaurants and hotels attribute their business to patrons of Six Flags amusement park, Wet 'n' Wild water park, and Arlington Convention Center, all within one mile of the Ballpark. Comiskey Park The new Comiskey Park opened in 1991, across the street from the old Comiskey Park on Chicago's South Side. The area has been home to the Chicago White Sox since 1910. Several nearby restaurants report that sales notably increase on White Sox game days, in comparison to non -game days. One local establishment predicted that it would go out of business if the team were not present. Comiskey's situation is somewhat unique, in that it is located in an urban setting, though relatively far removed from any concentration of retail, restaurant, residential/industrial or hotel development that characterizes the neighborhoods of many other arenas. -13- IV. NBA TRENDS The National Basketball Association continues to be a popular form of family entertainment. Several observations may be made which highlight the NBA's growth in popularity: • Historical attendance growth trends; • Financial characteristics of the game continue to increase (i.e. television contracts, player salaries, expansion franchise fees, team values); and • Intense competition among communities to attract and maintain NBA franchises. One sign of the growing popularity of the NBA is the investment of media and communications companies in the league. These businesses are attracted to the substantial and predictable audience of NBA fans for their products and programming. Major entertainment, media and communications companies, and consumer products companies, in the NBA include Time Warner (Atlanta Hawks), Cablevision Systems Corp./ITT Corp. (New York Knicks), COMSAT Corp./Ascent Entertainment Group, Inc. (Denver Nuggets), Ackerley Communications, Inc. (Seattle SuperSonics), Orca Bay Sports & Entertainment (Vancouver Grizzlies), Clear Channel Communications, Inc. (San Antonio Spurs), Comcast Corp. (Philadelphia 76ers) and Dial Corp. (Phoenix Suns). To illustrate this historic growth in attendance, the following exhibit presents attendance trends for the National Basketball Association and the Miami HEAT. 800.000 600,000 • u c w c < 400,000 200.000 NBA and Miami HEAT ■NBA 1990-1996 Annual Attendance ■HEAT 1989-90 1990-91 1991-92 1992-93 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 The limited seating capacity at Miami Arena has constrained the growth of attendance at HEAT games in comparison with the league, in which the average seating capacity is 19,000. -14- Arena Development Trends Over the past several years several new basketball arenas have been developed. The purpose of much of this development has been to replace older venues with limited potential for financial growth, with state-of-the-art, revenue enhancing facilities. The financial obsolescence of arenas has been an increasing concern for professional sports franchises which are struggling with higher costs from free agency, increasing player salaries, and lower broadcasting and other media revenues. Due to declining profitability, teams are seeking better arrangements and higher revenues from the arena. Teams see an opportunity to increase revenues through premium seating, advertising, parking, concessions and merchandise. Skyboxes, club seats and other premium seating options are not available or not as plentiful in older venues. Advertising is a potential revenue source as corporations are becoming more involved in sponsorship of professional sports venues. For example, there is an increasing trend for corporations to purchase naming rights to a venue and hold long-term agreements for dominant video board advertising. In addition, newer venues are designed with many points of sale for concessions and merchandise, potentially boosting revenues. Most facilities considered financially obsolete are being replaced. For example, the Fleet Center, home of the Boston Celtics (NBA) and Boston Bruins (NHL), replaced the Boston Garden. Other financially obsolete venues which have been replaced as an NBA team's venue include USAir Arena (MCI Center), the Philadelphia Spectrum (CoreStates Center), and Chicago Stadium (United Center). Even facilities developed in the late 1980's (Charlotte Coliseum, Orlando Arena, Miami Arena) were not developed with what is now considered sufficient "standard' revenue - producing amenities (suites/seats). Since 1988, a great majority of NBA teams are playing in a new arena or have taken steps in planning a new facility. Arena Development Summary National Basketball Association No Announced Plans Planned New Facilities New Facilities (1988-1997) The following table presents a list of all 29 NBA arenas which are currently existing or under construction. The Miami Arena ranks 17"' in terms of its age and 29' in terms of seating capacity. -15- Also, a dearth of luxury suites compared to other facilities places the arena in a disadvantageous position. National Basketball Association Arena Characteristics Year Team Arena Built Capacity Other Major League Tenants 1 Toronto Raptors Air Canada Centre (2) 1999 22.500 2 Atlanta Hawks The Omni (2) 1999 20,000 3 Washington Wizards MCI Center (2) 1997 20,000 Washington Capitals 4 Golden State Warriors Oakland Coliseum (3) 1997 19.200 5 Philadelphia 76ers CoreStates Center 19% 18.200 Philadelphia Flyers 6 Vancouver Grizzlies General Motors Place 1995 19200 Vancouver Canucks 7 Portland Trailblazers Rose Garden 1995 21.500 8 Boston Celtics Fleet Center 1995 18.600 Boston Bruins 9 Seattle Supersonics Key Arena (3) 1995 17.100 10 Cleveland Cavaiiers Gund Arena 1994 20,5W 11 Chicago Bulls United Center 1994 21.711 Chicago Blackhawks 12 San Antonio Spurs Atamodome (1) 1993 20.662 13 Phoenix Suns America West Arena 1992 19.100 Phoenix Jets 14 Utah Jazz Delta Center 1991 19,911 15 Minnesota Timbetwolves Target Center 1990 19.006 16 Orlando Magic Orlando Arena (1) 1969 16,010 17 Miami heat Miami Arms (1) 11111" 15,2W FWida Panthers 18 Charlotte Hornets Charlotte Coliseum (1) 1988 24.042 19 Detroit Pistons The Palace at Auburn Hills 1988 21,454 20 Milwaukee Bucks Bradley Center 19W 18.633 21 Sacramento Kings ARCO Arena 19W 17.317 22 New Jersey Nets Continental Airlines Arena 1981 20.049 New Jersey Devils 23 Dallas Mavericks Reunion Arena (1) 1980 18.042 Dallas Stars 24 Denver Nuggets McNichols Arena (1) 1975 17,171 Colorado Avaisnctie 25 Houston Rockets The Summit (1) 1975 16,611 26 Indiana Pacers Market Square Arena (1) 1974 16.530 27 New York Knocks Madison Square Garden 1968 19.763 New York Rangers 28 Los Angeles Lakers Great Western Forum (1) 1967 17.505 Los Angeles Kings 29 Los Angeles Clippers Los Angeles Sports Arena (1) 1959 16.021 (1) Planningtstudying a new facility. (2) Under construction. (3) Renovated. Impact on Attendance Increases in attendance were experienced by NBA teams such as the Cavaliers, Bulls, Spurs, Suns and Jazz in the years following their move into new arenas. The average percentage increase in attendance for these teams in the years following their move is approximately 30 percent. It should be noted that this increase may be explained, in part, by the "honeymoon effect." Two other teams, the Bucks and Pistons, may be experiencing a leveling -off of attendance since moving into new arenas in 1988. The following charts illustrate these trends. -16- 25,000 20,000 • c 15,000 M C 10,000 5,000 0 25,000 20,000 15,000 e v c • 10,000 5,000 0 25,000 20,000 15,000 • v c 10,000 Q 5,000 0 Chicago Bulls Average Attendance 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 New Arena Cleveland Cavaliers Avenge Attendance 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 New Arena San Antonio Spurs Average Attendance 1996 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 New Arena -17- 25.000 20.000 r8 15,000 v c r 10.000 5,000 0 25.000 20.000 15,000 a c 10,000 5.000 0 Utah Jazz Average Attendance 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 New Arena _ Phoenix Suns Average Attendance 1995 1996 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 New Arena _ 25.000 20.000 u c 15.000 a c 10.000 5.000 0 Milwaukee Bucks Average Attendance ( aa�New Arcna_ 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 New Arena -18- 25,000 20,000 15,000 10,000 5,000 Detroit Pistons Average Attendance 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 New Arena _ -19- APPENDIX A Economic Impact Concepts Economic impacts from NBA franchises and arena operations result from the export of services and the import of new spending. In their simplest form, economic impacts can be measured by estimating total direct expenditures resulting from events held at the facility and the spin-off or ripple effect as these direct expenditures (first -round spending) are re -spent (by their "second" or "third" round recipients) within the local economy. The local economy realizes increase in jobs and sales as a result of this spending. The indirect, or subsequent round, spending is commonly known as the multiplier effect. Each dollar initially spent within a local economy may be re -spent on other goods and services. However, every dollar is not re -spent within the designated economy indefinitely. Rather, recipients of the first round of spending may purchase some goods and services outside the defined community. These leakages diminish the size of each spending round, ultimately reducing it to zero. Multipliers measure the portion of direct spending that is retained in subsequent rounds of spending within a local economy. The size of a given economy's or area's multiplier is directly related to its geographic size, population and diversity of its industrial and commercial base. A larger population is generally able to support a more diverse economic base and more products are likely to be manufactured and purchased locally. Therefore, money injected into the economy is re -spent more often, causing greater changes in local business volume. The existence of an NBA team in a community creates impacts on the economy in several ways. During a game, in -arena spending occurs on items such as tickets, concessions, merchandise and parking. Before and after a game, out -of -arena spending occurs in restaurants and other establishments. The operations of the team generate other sources of expenditure on items such as advertising, broadcasting, premium seating and visiting team spending. Definitions of Economic Impacts Economic impacts are calculated in terms of direct effects, indirect effects, and total spending. Each of these terms are defined below. • Direct effects are defined as "first round" spending generated by the construction of the new arena and operation of the team in the City of Miami and Dade County. These are expenditures that are directly related to the franchise and can be categorized as follows: - Construction spending — non -recurring spending during the construction of the facility; - In -arena — spending that occurs during a game within the arena (i.e. ticket sales, concessions, souvenirs, parking, etc.); - Out -of -arena — expenditures made before and after a game by fans at nearby restaurants, bars or retail establishments; and - Other spending — spending generated by the presence of the HEAT in Miami. Indirect effects consist of the re -spending of the first round of expenditures. This occurs as the dollars spent on direct goods and services are distributed throughout the economy, A-1 continually changing hands, leading to further expenditures, or indirect spending. However, every dollar is not re -spent within the designated economy indefinitely. Rather, recipients of the direct expenditures may spend a portion of their income outside the defined community. As this leakage occurs, the flow is diminished, and ultimately exhausted. • Total effect is the sum of direct and indirect effects produced by the HEAT and arena operations. Total effects are provided in terms of sales, resident income and employment. Multiplier Effects Input-output analysis or modeling describes the sum of transactions between suppliers and consumers of goods and services. The initial round of sales for such products is the direct effect. The sellers of these products then purchase goods and services from other producers, generating the indirect effect. This process continues until leakage occurs and the flow ceases. A common issue raised concerning input-output models is that of substitution, or "displaced spending." This issue addresses the question of what would happen to dollars spent by resident fans if the facility did not exist. If residents would otherwise have spent these dollars on other local activities, it could be argued that a facility is not responsible for any increase in local spending by residents. Conversely, if "facility dollars" spent by local residents would otherwise have been uses+ for activities outside the local area, (the team playing its home games in a neighboring city), then these dollars do not merely represent displaced spending, and without the facility the area would lose these impacts. Thus, both the spending generated from non-residents due to the existence of the facility in the region, as well as resident spending which would be lost if the facility were moved outside the region, should be included in the determination of the total economic impact of a venue. As noted within the report, as a result of a relocation of the HEAT, neighboring counties would acquire the spending currently taking place in the City of Miami and Dade County due to the presence of the HEAT. This spending is comprised of expenditures made by fans coming from outside the City of Miami and Dade County and local resident spending which would likely follow the HEAT to a venue in a neighboring county. IMPLAN produces a report which provides multipliers for over 500 sectors of economic activity at the county, region and state level. These are calculated using the methodology described in the following section. Indirect effects can be mathematically derived by input-output models and result in sets of muthpliers, specific to a particular region or economy. These sets provide a description of the change in sales for every regional industry caused by a one dollar change in demand for any given industry. The data used in the model is based on 1994 economic activity. For this reason, direct spending applied to the employment multipliers is deflated to reflect expenditures in 1994 dollars. The notion of a multiplier rests upon the difference between the initial effect of a change in final demand and the total effects of that change. Total effects can be calculated either as direct and indirect effects, or as direct, indirect, and induced effects. Direct effects are production changes associated with the immediate effects or final demand changes. Indirect effects impact area production changes in backward -linked industries caused by the changing input needs of directly affected industries (for example, additional purchases to produce additional output). Induced effects are the changes in regional household spending patterns caused by changes in household income generated from the direct and indirect effects. A-2 Three different sets of multipliers are estimated by IMPLAN corresponding to three measures of regional economic activity: total sales, personal income, and employment. For each set of multipliers, three types of multipliers are generated, Type I, Type II and Type III. For this analysis, Type Ill multipliers were employed. • Type I multipliers: A Type I multiplier is the direct effect, produced by a change in final demand, plus the indirect effect divided by the direct effect. Increased demands are assumed to lead to increased employment and population with the average income level remaining constant.. • Type II multipliers: A different type of multiplier is the Type 11. In addition to inter -industry effects, this multiplier takes into account the income and expenditures of households. A Type II multiplier includes the induced, or household spending, effects. Changes in household income may induce a change in regional household spending patterns. Type Ill multipliers. The IMPLAN Type Ill multiplier is calculated like the Type II multiplier, except for the induced effect. The induced component is an employment based calculation. It assumes full employment and, therefore, each job adds/subtracts population with an associated average expenditure per person. Type III multipliers are based on the employment generated by the new economic activity as captured by the Type i multiplier. This new employment is translated into a number of persons through a population to worker ratio. The population change is introduced to the model, resulting in induced economic activity via Type I multipliers. As a result of direct spending, the City of Miami and Dade County economies should benefit from the following: Total sales. Represents an increase in aggregate economic activity resulting from import of new expenditures (or new dollars imported into an economy) as a result of HEAT -related spending by non-residents or residents whom, without the new enterprise, would have spent their dollars outside the region. In other words, it represents the total dollar flow of sales made by major economic sectors (wholesale, retail, manufacturing and service). These multipliers are used to measure the interdependence of the HEAT and other businesses in the regional economy. • Total income. Represents direct and indirect changes in resident employee compensation resulting from increased employment from new dollars flowing into the economy. • Total employment. Represents direct and indirect employment effects from the production of one million dollars of sales. Employment is measured in total jobs (in terms of full- and part-time jobs). A-3 APPENDIX B Limiting Conditions Services performed in relation to this report did not include ascertaining the legal and regulatory requirements applicable to this proposed project, including zoning, other state and local government regulations, permits and licenses. Furthermore, no effort was made to determine the possible effect of this project on present or future federal, state or local legislation, including any bond restrictions, environmental or ecological matters, interpretations thereof or subsurface conditions. The analysis of economic impacts generated by sports -related activities was based on the work plan described in our proposal dated September 15, 1997, estimates and assumptions from previous studies, information developed from supplemental research, knowledge of the industry and other sources, including certain information provided by the clienL These sources of information and bases of significant estimates are stated in the report Some assumptions inevitably will not materialize and unanticipated events and circumstances may occur. Therefore, actual results achieved may vary from estimates, and the variations may be material. Furthermore, Price Waterhouse is not responsible for future marketing cfkxts and other management actions upon which actual results depend. The terms of this engagement are such that Price Waterhouse has no obligation to revise the final report to reflect events or conditions which occur subsequent to the date of the report However, Price Waterhouse will be available to discuss the necessity for revision in view of changes in the economic or market factors affecting the project. Report and analysis of characteristics included herein are intended for the information of the person or persons to whom they are addressed, solely for the purposes stated therein and should not be relied upon for any other purpose. Neither this report, nor its contents, nor any reference to Price Waterhouse LLP may be included or quoted in any offering circular or registration statement, prospectus, sales brochure, advertisement, appraisal, loan or other agreement or documentation without prior written consent Price Waterhouse does not, as part of its economic analysis, perform an audit, review or examination (as defined by the AICPA) of any of the historical or future estimated financial information, and therefore does not express any opinion with regard to the same. B-1 AMERICAN AIRLINES ARENA Minority Construction Employment Plan -4 AMERICAN AIRLINES ARENA MINORITY & SMALL BUSINESS ENTERPRISE PROGRAM The Applicant has entered into a Development Agreement with Metropolitan Dade County dated April 29, 1997 which outlines the minority and small business program requirements for the project. The essential components are outlined as below; ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES Pursuant to Section 20.1 of the Development Agreement the Applicant is required to comply with the spirit and intent of Sections 2-8.2, 2-8.3 and 2- 8.4 of the County Code regarding the County's Minority Business Enterprises "MBE Program". The Applicant, with the approval of the Dade County Review Committee, has established an overall MBE Goal of at least 30% which shall be comprised of a goal of 10% BBE subcontractor participation, 10% WBE subcontractor participation and a goal of 10% HBE subcontractor participation for the provision of architectural and engineering services related to the project. The Applicant has entered into an Architectural Services Agreement with Arquitectonica International Inc. "Architect" and as provided for in the Agreement, the Architect is responsible for carrying out the Applicant's obligation pursuant to the Development Agreement through the various sub -consulting agreements that it enters into with respect to the project. The program will be monitored by the County's Department of Business Development. The Architect's Affirmative Action Plan is attached hereto. CONSTRUCTION SERVICES Pursuant to Section 20.2 of the Development Agreement the Applicant is required to voluntarily comply with the County's Ordinance 97-52 Community Small Business Enterprise Ordinance, as amended. The Applicant has, with the approval of the Dade County Review Committee, established an overall goal of 15.47% of CSBE participation in the construction of the project. As of the writing of this report, the Applicant, with the cooperation of the County, is in the process of amending the Development Agreement which will have the effect of deleting the Applicant's obligation to comply with the CSBE Ordinance 97-52, as amended, and replacing same with the Applicant's own project specific Manager's Local Business Enterprise Program ("MLBE Program") The essential components of the MLBE Program are as follows; The overall goal for construction services is to be at least 30%. • This overall goal shall be comprised of 15.47 % CSBE participation and 14.53% Middle Level Business Enterprise participation. • The program will be generally consistent with the CSBE Ordinance utilizing CSBE certified firms and, for the Middle Level Enterprise program, a project specific certification program will be implemented. • The General Contractor shall be contractually obligated to comply with the spirit and intent of the MLBE Program as well as contractually obligated to meet the overall goal and sub -goals. • The program will be monitored by both the Applicant and the County's Department of Business Development. 9M DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT March 03; 1997 Mrs. Laurinda Spear Arquitectonica 426 Jefferson Avenue, Suite 200 Miami Beach, FL 33139 RE: AfF=ative Action Plan (No. 9338) Dear Mrs. Spear: Your Affirmative Action Plan for 1997 -1998 has been approved. A copy of your Declaration of Policy is enclosed for display in a conspicuous location within your facility. This approval is effective until February 28, 1998. You should submit an updated -I to this office thirty days prior to the expiration date. In the event of a change in the firm's name, address, telephone number or dissolution of the firm, please notify this office. If you have any questions, please contact Mrs. Amparo D. Cardenas at the address or telephone number indicated below. Sincer ly, -tester Sol*, Director Arch./Eng. & Certification Division Enclosure AROUITECTONICA Dade County Affirmative Action Plan February 25, 1997 Table of Contents A. Declaration of Policy B. Memorandum From The President C. Utilization Analysis D. Narrative of Programmatic Activities and Goals E. Utilization of Local Minority Businesses F. Grievance Procedures G. Program Reporting .au yncxea avenue. sure za. ++ram.. rtonoa -J Ieieohone 3P5;371 1911 ieieiax 305,372 1175 ARQulTEcToNia Declaration of Policy In accordance with County Ordinance 82-37, amending Section 2-10.4 (5) (d) of the Dade County Code, Arquitecton'sc. International Inc. affirms its commitment to submittal of an Affirmative Action Plan which has the purpose of mandatory equal employment and promo- tional opportunity, with particular emphasis on improving the Black work force population and utilization of Black professional firms, consultants and/or suppliers. Bernardo Fort -Brescia, FAIA Principal Date: February 25, 1997 Affirmative Action Officer Date: February 25, 1997 Dade County Representing Authority Date: Arditecttrre Plonning Interior Design Registration #AA C000465 AffUU/ I rG I U1vn;A Interoffice Memo To All Employees From Laurinda Spear, FAIA Date February 25, 1997 Re Affirmative Action Plan Copies Dade County Affirmative Action Plan Declaration of Policy - In accordance with County Ordinance 82-37, amending Section 2-10.4 (5) (d) of the Dade County Code, Arquitectonica international, Inc, affirms its commitment to submittal of an Affirmative Action Tian which has the purpose of maintaining equal empioyment and promo- tional opportunity, with oarticuiar emphasis on improving the- Black work force population and utilization of Black professional firms, consultants and/or suppliers. Victor Yue is the firm's Affirmative Action Officer. He will have day-to-day responsibility for implementing and monitoring our plan. The Affirmative Action Plan is available for your review during normal working hours. For review of the plan, please contact Anthony Rimore, Director of Marketing. In order to ensure that all of our employees are advised of the Company's policy of nondis- crimination and our continuing commitment to actively and affirmatively providing equal employment opportunity, a meeting will be held with Department Heads and supervisory personnel to present the updated plan and discuss individual responsibility of the firm's management personnel in its implementation. Following this meeting, individual staff meet- ings will be held by each Department to discuss the plan and answer any questions. Sub- sequent to these individual meetings, the Affirmative Action Plan, as part of employee orientation, will be discussed with new personnel. The Company will seek qualified minority -group applicants for all job categories, including Blacks, Women and other minority groups by maintaining a dose relationship with commu- nity organizations, local employment offices and professional societies regarding regular and new recruitment sources. In addition, the Company will establish and maintain con- tacts with colleges and universities. S'lA'1'ISTICAL WORKFORCE ANALYSIS FIRM'S NAME: Arquitectonica International LOCATION: 550 Brickell Avenue • Suite 200 Miami, FL 33131 JOB CATEGORY A. TOTAL NUMBER PER R,ACIAL/ETHNIC GROUP STATUS JOB CATEGORY B. TOTAL PERCENTAGE PER WHITE HISPANIC OTHER COMBINEDTOTALS JOB CATEGORY _ M — F ------ M ------ --- -- F--- M ---- -- F-- --- M .- .-- F -- --W -- B -- _ H - - 0. PRINCIPALS -- — __ AND A. IN-HOUSETOTALS 02 01 02 02 01 03 04 01 MANAGERS B. IN-HOUSE/EEOPERCENTAGES 3.17% 1.58% 3.17% 3.17% 1.58% 4.7% 6.34% 1.58% REGISTERED PROFESSIONALS A. IN-HOUSETOTALS 03 02 06 04 04 05 10 04 (not Included above) B. IN-HOUSE/EEOPERCENTAGES 4.7% 3.17% 9.7% 6.34% 6.34% 7.9% 16% 6.34% OTHER A. IN-HOUSETOTALS 03 03 03 Oi 04 04 03 PROFESSIONALS 03 06 04 08 06 B IN-HOUSE/EEOPERCENTAGES 4.7% 4.7% 4.7% 1.fi8% 6.34% 6.34% 4.7% 1 4.1% 9.7% 6.34% 12.8% 9.7% PARA A. IN-HOUSETOTALS PROFESSIONALS B. IN-HOUSE/EEO PERCENTAGES 03 - — 02 ---- --- — 02 -- —05 — — -- - ---- - — — o'—.. - - OFFICE AND A. IN HOUSETOTALS 05 CLERICAL B. IN-HOUSE/EEOPERCENTAGES 4.7% — 3.17% 3.17% 7.9% 7.9% 11.3% OTHERS (Define and list A. IN-HOUSETOTALS In the narrative) B. IN-HOUSE/EEOPERCENTAGES Officer Signature: - �\t Victor Yli, I/ 100% of theTotal Index Figure. Action Officer 1, I 06 L 03 I -_,r-C 5 ._I -_08 L 03_-_19--1_-04__-I- -29 - i- 11 Date: February 25, 1997 rum name: Arquusctonics I. I.i ? i r:.J: _ 1 Description of Date Contract Authorised Expiration Minority Contract Awarded Amount Work Date Firm Type Minority Firm Name Amounts 02/95 - 02/96 Paid to Minority 02/96 - 02/97 Firms 02/97 - preseni f ward Paid Award Paid Award Paid D-F Wrap - MIA CCO # R-95-DCAD-13 07/96 11,472,159 4,133,892 2004 BBE Hellon and Taylor 1,606,324 66,407 WBE San Martin & Associates 1,375,000 40,260 HBE 9 Crs 2,320.536 65,211 HBE Construction Estimating '3ervices 100.E 22.SW U 9�S{ ��/1 '1 tJ (� tl -- Et� I K 0 0 7 �J Q UC rrirl0 yl A A a�f i/�� �i 3 2So�► /0 0'!0 � qo SAN MA*iN + p�qo tt& Po,j«T Y Qf SSac�af �S 7qN G-S )CPO C�a p►o1r�.� , cf1191 cr;�ti FAlif+A'r'kvs `SUvK4 r sf,-it U� rr S 0 Affirmative Action Policies and Practices Arquitectonica International, Inc. Introduction The employment policies and practices of Arquitectonica is to recruit and hire employees without discrimi- nation because of race, creed, color, national origin, sex, age, or mental and physical handicaps that do not interfere with job performance and further, to treat employees equally with respect to compensation and opportunities for advancement, including upgrading, promotion and transfer, with particular emphasis on improving the Black work force por�,uiation and utilization of Black professional firms, consultants and/or suppliers. This Program reaffirms the continued commitment to a policy of equal opportunity and merit employment policies and encourages the maximum effort to achieve employment and utilization of the capabilities and productivity of our citizens and legal residents without regard to race, creed, color, national origin, sex, age or mental and physical handicaps that do not interfere with job performance. The Company further recognizes that the effective application of a policy of merit employrien d involves more than just a policy statement and has, therefore, undertaken a program of affirmative action to make known that equal opportunities are available on the basis of individual merit. We encourage all persons to seek employment with the Company and to strive for advancement on this basis. The Company will take appropriate steps to ensure that all employees are advised of the policy of nondis- crimination and the commitment to actively and affirmatively provide equal employment opportunity. For example: 1. All management and supervisory personnel will participate in a meeting to present time. Company's updated plan and discuss individual responsibility for its implementation. 2. Other personnel in a position to implement this policy, including those engaged in recruiting, train- ing and other personnel activities, will be fully advised of the policy and of their responsibilities with respect to enforcemetiL 3. Individual staff meetings will be held by each Department to discuss the plan and answer any questions regarding the Company's policy of nondiscrimination and our continuing commitment to actively and affirmatively providing equal employment opportunity in order to ensure application of policies throughout the entire Company. 4. The Company will communicate Affirmative Action policies in such media as in-house publica- tions, notices on bulletin boards, employee handbooks and orientation of new employees. S. A copy of the Company's EEO Status Report will be made available to all supervisory personnel and these personnel will be advised periodically of the importance of providing full and complete equal employment opportunity on all jobs and in all phases of work. This includes an emphasis on improving the utilization of the Black work force population. 6. A copy of the Affirmative Action Plan will be made available to all employees who want to review the Company's policy. As Equal Employment Officer for Arquitectonica, Victor Yue, a vice president of the Company, has respon- sibility for coordination and implementation of the Affirmative Action Plan. Narrative of Programmatic Activities and Goals Recruitment/Advertising The Company will seek qualified minority -group applicants for all job categories, including Blacks, Women and other minority groups representative of the community and will make particular efforts to increase minority group representation in occupations at the higher levels of skill and responsibility. This will be achieved through: 1. All available sources of recruitment used by the Company, including schools, colleges, employ- ment offices and other sources, will be advised of the company's Affirmative Action policy and will be urged to refer qualified minority -group applicants. 2. Recruiting programs at local schools and colleges will include those programs which are attended by substantial numbers of minority group members. 3. All employment advertisements will include a statement of Affirmative Action in accordance with Dade County Ordinance 82-37. 4. Where appropriate, employment advertisements will be placed in newspapers which are widely read by and devoted to the interests of minority groups. The Company will also request appropri- ate minority group agencies to assist in the promotion of the Company's policy and will advise such groups of available employment opoortunities. 5. Referrals of minority personre! for all jot categc^ss %rill be encouraged from present employees. 6. In conjunction with professional architectural and engineering societies, the Company will partici- pate in programs and seminars at local colleges and universities. This includes participation in Architectural and Engineering 'mixers' at local colleges and universities which provide students with the opportunity to discuss careers with professionals, as well as lectures in marketing and business practices. 7. The Company will identify colleges and universities that are attended by minority students in other locations in the United States and participate in individual programs for summer employment and professional recruitment. 8. The Company will provide tours of its facilities for minority youths, with an emphasis on Blade youths, to better acquaint them with the actual working environment of the architectural and engi- neering professions. Hiring Procedures The Company will, on a regular basis, review job categories in which few minority -group persons are presently employed and seek to determine the reasons for this low representation of minorities. When necessary, remedial efforts may include actions such as: 1. Vigorous recruitment of qualified Blacks, Women and other minority group candidates will be initi- ated. 2. Scheduling of special meetings with appropriate management, supervisory and other personnel to discuss the Company's policy and the desire to ensure the utilization of qualified minority group personnel at all job levels. Promotion Procedures Promotions will be made entirety on the basis of performance and achievement without regard to race, creed, color, national origin, sex, age, or mental and physical handicaps that do not interfere with job performance. All employees will have the opportunity to compete and be promoted in accordance with the Company's Affirmative Action Program. This will be achieved by. 1. The Company will evaluate the placement of personnel and performance in given positions. When an employee's skills, interest and abilities are not being fully utilized, an attempt will be made to place the employee in a more suitable job at the earliest opportunity. 2. Transfers of personnel at all levels will be monitored to ensure that consideration, as required by the Company's Attirnative Action Program, has been given to qualified minority group employees. 3. The Company will periodically reevaluate the qualifications of the lower echelon of minority -group employees to determine whether their skills and capabilities might be more fully utilized at higher job levels or would warrant their transfer to other types of jobs which more readily lead to advance- ment in accordance with Affirmative Action guidelines. Training Procedures Appropriate steps will be taken to give active encouragement to Blacks, Women and other minority group employees to increase their skills and job potential through participation in available training and education programs. PublicityAntemal and External The Company will include the use of an Affirmative Action Statement in both external and internal publicity to ensure that both the public and our employees are aware that Arquitectonica is an 'equal opportunity employer.' This includes: 1. Company Brochures 2. Advertisements in Professional Publications 3. Advertisements in Community Publications 4. Classified Advertisements for Recruitment 5. Employee Manual 6. Project Manager's Manual Affirmative Action Goals Arquitectonica will continue to provide employment and opportunities for promotion to the Blade workforce and other minority professionals. This will include: Th.;, 1.0-mpany :: ! provide u e oapartunirvr to crow w;:hin saecific disciplines and to gain an under- standing of the business and marketing aspects of the profession. 2. The Company will expand its support of Black and other minority students in public schools, includ- ing summer employment to provide an opportunity for practical experience in various professional disciplines. 3. The Company will maintain records and resource files on its EEO Programs. Continuous and ongoing research will be conducted to develop and implement programs for equal employment opportunities. Programs will be revised, updated and improved upon as required. 4. The Company is committed to the utilization of Blade owned businesses in the normal course of conducting business and encourages the participation of Black Minority Business Enterprises as sub -consultants and as suppliers of goods and services. S. Prior to formalization of subcontracts on any project. consultants will be required, as part of our contract, to certify that the consultant has an Affirmative Action Program, in compliance with Dade County Ordinance 82-37, to ensure that equal opportunity is provided to all persons without regard to race, creed, color, national origin, sex, age, or mental and physical handicaps that do not inter- fere with job performance. 6. The Company will continue to assist Black -owned and other minority -owned architectural and en- gineering enterprises in business development, contributing expertise in the preparation of quali- fications and proposals. Where appropriate, the Company will also serve as sub -consultant to minority -owned firms, thereby increasing the overall strength of the Team. Specific Examples of Meeting Goals Representative of past efforts by Arquitectonica in meeting Affirmative Action goals are: RecruitmenttPromotion of Minority Employees During the past year, the Company has continued efforts in the areas of recruitment and promotion of minority employees. We have contacted the Miami Job Service and also the Florida Division of Rehabilitative Services, as well as interviewed several Black Students from the University of Florida for summer internships and also full time employment opportunities as they arise at Arquitectonica. We are presently working with Mr. Oscar Branyon, of Commisione, Barbara Carey's office, in the identification of individuals who might be able to fill job openings at Arquitectonica. To this end, we are interviewing Mr. Sean Holt for a marketing position. We also, as a matter of course, when advertising positions, make known that we are EOE, in accordance with Dade County Ordir:ance 62-37 and we actively encourage Black, Hispanic and Female applicants for all available jobs. We also keep in contact with Mrs. Amparo D. Cardenas, the AAP Coordinator for the Dade County Department of Business and Economic Development. The result has been an increase in the pear.'.: ge of minorities and worn- on me urm's off. inciuding: • Promotion of an Asian male to Department Head and Vice President for Architecture an Asian female to our Interior Design Department • Recruitment of a Black male to a professional position in architecture Working Associations With Black -Owned and Woman -owned Firms Arquftectonica has formed ongoing professional associations with numerous loc3l and Woman -owned firms. In many cases, these associations have included guidance in busi- ness development, the preparation of qualifications, pLv ming of presentations and manage- ment of government contracts. These associations include: • The Architects Hall, a BBE Architectural firm • Architectural Design Consortium, a BBE Architectural firm • Allen and Associates, A BBE firm • Miami NDT, A BBE firm • EAC Consulting, A BBE frim • IMDC, Inc., A BBE firm • LKG-CMC, Inc., a WBE firm • Laura Llerena & Associates, a Woman -owned Landscape firm • Weidener Surveying, a WBE firm • Miami Non -Destructive Testing, a Black -owned materials testing firm Minority A/E Students in Colleges and Universities • Colleges and universities with programs for minority students have been identified and will be included in future efforts for recruitement. Professional Organizations Bernardo Fort -Brescia, a Principal of the firm, serves on the Presidents Council of the Ameri- can Institute of Architecture and assists in their efforts to expand the opportunities for minority - owned firms within the community for local projects, as well as work for federal agencies. Community Organizations Arquitectonica has also become involved in programs sponsored by local community organi- zations, particularly those related to Black and other minority groups. This has included the following pro bono work. • Design of GrovePoint Low Income Housing Project in West Grove • Edison Terrace Low Income Housing • Continued partisipation and monetary support of Grove Outreach, a program to feed the poor in Coconut Grove. Utilization of Local Minority Businesses We have included Jimmie Allen and Associates, IMDC and other BBE firms in projects to further their expertise and to help them compete forprojects in their own right. The commitment of Arquitectonica to the utilization of local Black professional firms, consultants and sup- pliers is evidenced by the following listing of firms utilized by the Company the past 12 months. It should be noted that the Company has an ongoing association with the majority of these firms for the performance of public and private projects: • Bellon and Taylor (BBE) - Miami, Florida Architecture firm included in our projects Total Project Cost: $1 „506,324 Amount Paid to Minority Consultant (Contractor): $86,407 Completion Date: 2004 • San Martin Associates (WBE) Engineering Consultant for various projects Total Project Cost: $1,375,097 Amount Paid to Minority Consultant; $40,260 Completion Date: 2004 • HNGS (HBE) Engineering Consultant for various proje w Toial Project Cost; $2,328,535 Amount Paid to Minority Consultant: $58,211 Completion Date: 2004 • Consb ruction Estimating Services (HBE) Engineering Consultant for various projects Total Project Cost: $100,000 Amount Paid to Minority Consultant: $22,500 Completion Date: 2004 Grievance Procedure The Affirmative Action Officer of Arquitectonica is responsible for ensuring that the principle of equal opportunity is communicated and understood throughout the Company and that all reasonable steps are taken to affect the realization of the spirit and intent of this principle within the Company. Employees are encouraged to bring to the attention of the Affirmative Action Officer all matters of personal concern, including those instances in which the employee believes that there has been unfair treatment. Program Reporting All employment and other related statistics and/or other records, relative to Metro -Dade County projects, reflecting progress under the Affirmative Action Plan will be Fvai;able for inspection during normal working hours to appropriate County government representatives. . For review of these files, contact: Anthony Rimore, Director of marketing These files are located at: 550 Brickell Avenue • Suite 200 Miami, Florida 33131 A periodic reporting and audit system has been established internally for the purpose of measuring EEO progress and preparing annual results for submittal to the Office of Minority Business Development of Metro -Dade County for monitoring progress. AMERICAN AIRLINES ARENA ;6. Architectural & Aess Dra wings,; ., 4 'O.jk Y ay' i4. t y P Yrprl :k .I a'A lll( Fd a� ,� �' s � T � `A i .t � w, F�r�i I�� ilh I:,• ; �I hN"I ..�,.. !', IIlA i' s I N �I II a1y 11 I,. II •� r A. 44 4 W;P \ lr d'A I. II.�; 'I ylJlyl' IIJ Il IIIII I; o A r 1 P4 Y4 wI �at laps I.. ,y^JIh� Nll�;lld I I IIII III �'I rP b 4. � wl L Mr � r I ti I hl N'Ipr I I I k; p I r w '���'� �'�+� 1.� , �w j ��4'�', • o-:J.°'�I 'Y� Iti' A""y, III tYNp I p. I r Y� �� t'..�M�N ,^�+�� ,'. '•' � �k��l I" , I I INq�Pn�il�a'p�ry��141�4�L. 6 �'�} �• ����.i.� � I ��t � � o° ;� �� i yl+l�,i I d y ' "�II,{�I� III, li �Iyt�lr'�;� "�I d�IXI X�VII fI'u'x �h9a r ,�' Y � ! ` t r, i a �� 1s t; y , y M1 �f I!t [ky,, �"W r a,��•i;�j �I q�� N k:(A'Yn I ,r%Fr III r 7!'! v, •� � �, � I is ; ( �k �I" I "vl i k I I I;�itl{'IY d[ �I� +'Np I I ��I t }�^A 1! ► I�� d�l � I I d� N �� l� I pal I I P :IP 71 LIIIup y� h ulI MN I ywMrru x} �7e Ir IIII I � n NI �I "7P'Id I I �i4 IN • j ��� s pFA a I I �� d uII �I 'll k. 'i� J I I ' ''I � litil �s M Air �� � , � ; Y I Y • � ,ryr :� I 'I �� I ; �'NS�II I I;� I��� I I I,I • f�J !{1� f 1Y h.. {n: ,�I �r", i��n� I. 9 �ih IY�i rw. �, gg / I'' {i;:o I yl,i� y eR6� tL L 1* rr u N I v i' IPgYv. t .i" 11� ' Y� Ik14 ' fir , ( '�� �il?�� S � t �� ' N ' I I�dd ,� A� •�����,yd�� .FINI nil rxI ,/ fit10, f qd{ PS} ,It t 4 Alk, "Rat' IB:: , 1 R kq TT kI 7N 'IYN4 N ,s ,fry(^ ..Nt'4 R.' jai N" '�( ( 1 Mki , N P { t,NW �I` Y�r. .� ��,pi f�y�; k '� I � •• t. d� �(y� � FIN �"� I Xd i' 1114 v' N F Ar d ry � dryip:, Nd �I [�� Pi!! 'fi ,!issi III. �Xp`' c 'N plNll F rlA�q q ilk •I �l "' ry �IN� r Nul" +i �R }•. jMi s � IIf 9 �}�N h��° �I kl N�'"��4 Y�� � �; �• � ci r�g� �p�,t „ id�� �^ r,�,NdN�61�N li l ,fie t x, gy m Dill NI E� NGN it I ! .:.� �' • r I >< I nyN N I I III �'•. S ;. I I N IN d Mi 1.,., }III NI �uPpi M1I dl Nv�t S fINA q h • W x �x fi•t- Ilk) l fN R i 7 I 4ta. � .s�n'•���� h ad I• " �''�' :fir ! . • `� . ��'� �tiq� " fi Nil I I,� Ep U II 4.� �uau j t �.. I .lululWxWIN'udlNCl tl�ilYll 1 �•r 1I p� _} r r x illa i rl x � ,• �« i r 14H� `tr I� yiv�i���. l�I..:: ' ` I t. y7i i l II" Ali AD . a 1 G r„ �4i 9'' Iruu419,11r1 r1h,J,'','' i f Y I�y��nddd'WryIry pp t YIJ A J aax � ^,Ii M�y.IJ 1 j11f I I Mtj 10 Tit C'" �IT p �. rp I P I¢ � YIr.' r } •, j 55 Ili � 11` IA TIr d;FD it � "'I .. +ylS� -y`; ` " + �` "• t�"ry lu����illi� rl �w dtltl'„kaIPk111II��It11h�I � � a R s, d{. nglln'nWjn4+NG6 iu II I 1 In "N "GIIMywh,l Ii'I,! N 6i Itltikuel �' PA I; d I ... �" �f��l II }dp w� rylaR � ' �... 't �a f✓ '` _��� - � 4r��`. fu8 � � - gg • � y f .. �IV'. � il. 1r 1 } r � do Y,c ` � „ h '�ry��,�•, -�t ! ,r`: } � tom° � jam'• r"A+wa��'1 ,*( � �a,� - I I� /q' �fM � I 'W'!S � �. s 'Av{�- trST p� -if Id ' I•. Y 1i d >r y� t µ, 'Ar " •M n v —} wl 4I tit P } Y _ Y a. t 1 � k t Ee 6E y 't _- �- a' � I Ft�i i � ,,� � p ► - ar1� I tf �. � �. & � t YI. ✓r f tt �"n�r''. � ttl m{t 1 ' a r ,4 i i Lf � � 4I � � `,�,�•- iY �, 1 � 1 � 1 rS%�r �,`V 1 1 r ' �-� �Jruh .� Yi.' r tC _ r - vi ly dl ✓ r1 'i� fit+ 4 td +aB•k'+,�`-// 'T^' �,Jrn 14ell vn ' .'tS L t 1 l 1 yr -+Ajr � s �[[[�t �,. y r �• ` � ,�I y ��'h,� k pIt t+. i TI'. IIIIryNf�hn t',�`ci t4 t w L tyt, .n i Id al 'I HIII�r rg, �� �r�" I � ,f.}" ��J � + � I,i � ♦,1� `,. } �I� I IiN I '�I�i':I. t. P I M } I d I t'Vilp e� t of R,�4 l B,f IN I'll ^Idulll nl anullll IIhff'r1p� r O r' C Y ,f ' : r Emma WATER 9.P I I I i d i I �l rsa -t a.�r—. s•+ ua r sou r -.. _ t .,.7............-- lEMsngr _.�, ... .. .... ...-.. .......�._ l... p... .. ... ..._� .- s • �III//� - • ! JIIIIIAI lil/! ILMfill i; SrrE 'A' and 'B' NTS 4Y ll I '- .... ?......... In O pW BOkgVAPO rortr BOULEVM D O 4 O O i • M~ HEAT ARENA hE LUM HEAT it x�n-a �.er sj�mlm-oom A1YIr� M� s♦ sr� .aw_iza� w7M lar r� aw=�w.•e�l�.as_ _w .a_re• RAai waoaetmess®s JMO mmmbo ! NG arkm CITY OF MIAMI mu". Dan= 0rA Lcftmw POAW.#O[ Nona oaumcnom 1... Yn• >-r-n .�a7.ee wxH IylAla A0.10 Sf T E PLAN a .i i rl SITE 'A' GROSS AREA NTS rri TN it MOM FEAT ARENA 7W YAM HEAT � Mq Rom id1 tr In/bn-am .s :3ro077-0vt IDRI A ��►ems aa� na�aawore�es�� r��M�iear�air �N rrN rr_ RA�i01R�]IOBIN\ rr�iarwa�� �N rr �>• arrrr awwa rat• vbiir �Y�tra�iirY/r Y 1ri ��)•>r u��r�ar �s waor....y r.r Irr rr ® Ow PL1Mpt ! 10110ES r - +ri ew CITY OF MAN UJA". CB DeAL0PY6dr P'II[7W= "WPM OONi1PLR.'IIm rrr,�rrr� Irr Av IFr./I P-Pc% -out Oww �YKN m .N ' cif mom A0.12 SITE PLAN Lr c 2 c0 w v U a Ec a, C- ti c 2 0- SITE 'A' NET AREA NT5 TN M WNI NEAT ARENA TFE WU FEAT ac st s... — $— 2m -W "IRA 33,31 x5,= Gs (]611.fl ? ftm. r� Zvi �Y'�tae�W' r ra`efae� �N��Oiialli ��.�ni♦I�i� �M .YEN i.� I�mt� 2NrI A70a1® .�.wwrr 1NlSa �s CRY OF MIAMI MAL". Cem= 09vaOpmwr rAorAfis Nor row coNsrwucnoN ....o a im i A0.14 SfTE PLAN 0 C9 0 rn cu Ln CD z L F-- O a LL_ Q O } F— f--r U 0) LO cn / T- F— L-) W 7 O Q d EXISTING WATER SLIP EDCE OF SIDEWALX AND PARKING BELOW R lDX -, ,._ �ii��ii■■�I���. . .�_. ,__ .I _: �' 111. ..III �111 _ IIIIIIII�i119111111111■= 111 III IEI � !��■ Ci -I���_ _ ��'�iii. ~ ail ��11,/�7�__f��___��'�-_(����.�/�� �i■I�►/■I�■■11■�'ii�� w�►i �IIII��IIIIIIIIII■IIIIII �!�___ �_�_ �_ �___ �_ �___ I. ..�_ �_ IiAJAlAlil �___ ■___ �_�_w �.�� n �����41�E11�1111■!%�.�:. �i"S1♦�InAIIIcl; 5 0op.IH WIRE J� ��„I11• �,Il,�i'i,,, ,,, ,,,,,, i1i1,,�I, _ 11 —�. JIB 1111 OR �=■����-:��_a IIIIIIi1111■IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIEIII ONEMM, 1'lgj H F:■ •, _. �.. , �� ,r��� ' �,1,*,111 Jill IIIIIIIIII�IIIIIIIIIIEIII III I° II I•.III 1IiIuNI� O[ 101 I__�_•_,_;.,.i-r.�-' % „"1a110 Jill I�o'���,�'!�„�� "_l.I mall = II NORM II E'amr ■I I�II� I.I"K� Jill IIIIJEIII II■II11LI1II ■ II t4_ 'IEIIIIIEI cm d► �i1cC IIIIII I 1 : � : I�■Iri� IIc !�IIIII6T � N■� -!,--�--�_._�_��-�-�I���II 1-��I Belli .1IIl) �■ il���lllCi ���/o��=°"-A w111.1111111�1111�1111111 �III�III,I� �i— ���r��������, .11l11���1�111111 IIIIII ICJ^��_.�����������:SIIIIIIII��I�II�11111■I 11�I11111111 ■ °pumuuuu///uuu//n/n/uuq/u/n„ . l`////O/pp0p0ryprypppp////IIIII _ II �I. I a - I\ \ u/iuinipiuupiinungpnn/,ga2uun// IN <!a/iiu/D///OpjpO1jpj//Nmuuuuuunuunuunuuw uu a unnuuunnnuuuvuu:::aunnnuuunuonum,; rs::vnnunnnuunuuuuunuuuuuu a unuouuuuw y NAM MIAMI HEAT ARENA TFE MIA FEAT OKE SE Yd Aveae. Ails 2700 MWA ROAM 33131 Tel' (3 OS)5)1-4= Fac (705)372-OE02 aw{sea AMUMECTMICA Wa.oaunla 1a.I.lnaal A1d.x�n MIaIM .a0illllll0laY1M. S�illiGnd` !c Pu(nva�mc. m OOIYAta1.Y_ O.1LaY.RR_ _ wa. wOr awo .1a1WKmm1 1L�rnnD(�,ou�rnadD.� M a.a�aFMMRJ.I.I1011..Ya m aww wm aaws lvaew RAC: + DNR COBIUFq F710}®L9 .fta LSlaww.w m aess wm ara. PIDNAW ASI0611® smd Almu[e),.1.�41.Y K LaWa. l9laaevl )M1 aM .� w M awal DAVID PLUMLO i ASSOCMTES INC. PH MYKM CITY OF MIAMI MU.&P. DBKM CIEVIUMPNFM PAOGY'E NOT FOR Ire Gale II.00r.) p,aja�1 No.: 9{I9 oro... er OUAAMAK Appao.a M gH IaWMAa SMaI Na- Al .0I PARKING LEVEL I � I i Olt STREET m O m 0 Qn (T m C:) CU CU dC Lo 0 Z L F— C\.I O C1 LL- Q <y 3 F�— U Q) to Q7 Cn U W 7 O Q 0_ EXST WG WATER SUP �� pa •, B 1� s � T �9r.• CIF IS�A%� �•� � �. �'� �i*� —_ _ '11 �,r � �wlwlw�►I� �t GR�� '- �� lllllulli— — lilllllll Ca � ��� � M�� '� II�IIIII,I �� ��IIIIIII � 0�� ��_. �h��Iwn���� • �� �• ---ll. f' WA -------------------------------------------- �i If r m. MIAMI MEAT ARENA THE MIAM HEAT ONE SE 1W Ma Sub 23DO 131 7M (3M567 -4=BORN (.A!}773-ON2 ARaunFcr A%CMAMA .r,. FAX �-�- arr Artl[r.M aw..r ,�Rt�et�BR. StEs c.nada a Nutters, Inc. Wm mmrBsmrrsZ r«.� rrr,oaBv THDRNM -IO ASErn eiamm ., wm:,wwm I�pRw= r Fr r.tss KO M9BYr1 RICK+MW COALTWEIID•®6 ft r m, wr =r wm—> OLLsrrl o--- �nrwrLveoo►� sm�arsRrgsrrrra�ra sr a>r nnr rrN aaaarawm K L,wM. JW W M IAt PC .1iY DAVID PLUMW]t 8 ASSOCIATES INC. y1L yr iC� ,�yiv'i+"� CITY OF MIAMI UJIMP. DEEM OENt30PMEW PACKAGE NOT Pm COMI6TAUCTIOM law Batt a-Rf-f7 PnoJrct NtA619 D•s.n hy6IU0A16 byerM bprB 11VB/rIM R. N.IOJDat. Al .02 EVENT LEVEL Q O CY] O CY) cn CV f\ CU O LC7 O O Z CD 3 m 0 d LL Q 3 t— C-) CT LO m (n t— U W 7 O m C1 i Law i — — — — — — — — �W':�%�� 0 • IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII2IIIIIWg �•••••....•___.c_•__.��•�•:��_!�•�•���o: . it MM. MLWl HEAT ARENA 7 E MAY HEAT ONE SE .LA MMus, Sub 23W MPM4 FLORM 33I31 *r.(306)577 nN Fe, (3D5)372-0802 AKf118A AROUMECTON/CA =W,V' mo m+e w aoo mvs ..bm..v1. AtolitllNr MrrJee YO6IWLOMILY� Sp�lu C�nde� k Pa�ri�nPrs�ln� rmarwN¢mNN.YuaF�ar r eweY rYw eor mNnutrsrml THIOWTOMOMUM 91CRE6 Y /rl{OPMAYrW MYIeIRMLM YO YNr fYr Mi0 Irf wml HACK+KIM COMM *NCl IAIORNf.IYJ rl r� q[m !lr OlLwml I.IY000�LTNr MMlf A1000O® o aD Cm I W 4 ��F 01�.� It rl rolJ✓e w�JlJM LYQARea�frNn mQoawYa rrYryl u"e orb ].n. �..w l_7'.�ll K LeW., MYeMav� LN W M MNOM rr DAVID PLUMMER h ASSDCATES INC. � RAN CITY OF MIAMI MUBP. OEMM OEVk1.OPMFW PACKAGE NarFOR CON6iPA=0N teww Ltw M-06-9J P.aJrct No9619 G•e.n bY�4A9APA6 /�pp.ev.e byFY IW►JFL1a N.w.4a�/Det. sw..s Ne A1.03 PLAZA LEVEL cc 0 m a I\ Q') M a --I IT CL a --a s--I 0 0 Z aJ 3 Q V d LL Q F-- F-I U On ED / In F— U LLJ 0 a 10 • ��Ill��jii�%I • ,� lily%���I�� • ;�i�l, j 11 ��� • 11111�!�'� I I' il��ii� 1111 , 1 \ I 1 I-WI L:, I III��I�I�I� \ n 888 LOADWG AREA IMF * i�111�11111�l.' =) i1/111111//1 71111►11111 IIII EL.+4 4 M I I a-L� EL.+I 0.0 LOADWG AREA +8.0 EL.+7. f II L+4.4 an 0 'n J 0 f *EL+7.5 1 .2, II II II II II II WTI �I II II C� PORT BOULEVARD PORT BOULEVARD it MV1M1 HEAT ARENA TFE WAIA FEAT ONE SL 3 iLOR[N JJ131 2300 TN (3W)577-{J!. Fac (305)3n-=2 METIIC7 ARGUME T nnca NO arw cacao. arm tLls`Csndeb�. k Partners, Inc. .. m ewu. w.es...l..a R..M= O rRa FYRa ays MOMM.OES TH0WTC)l TCMASE I Bill®B ...G.OMM.C,.IIRRRi. No.aw wwwar a8...e1 Idol + cM CMRLT.O BIQ®i9 ..&MME .KWO.F ml . F.w w» O vw. _ UK: no..wu.. PMR410 AMM7® w >•>o r.w Tr.r I=J�JIJ K L M Mrwul .!w No— FIRM iM DANO PLUMMER i ASSOCIATES INC. my mm CITY OF MIAMI MAMP. OESM DEVEEDPAENr PACKAGE NOT FOR C *JurRUC ON law Atw u-..-n Pr.Jrct Nov619 s...., ereiws,6 Go..ovr. npFe .usn.+s Rr.ldan/Det• SMI� Rr Al .03A PLAZA LEVEL ,,.,, ; I .:`; r; ti �:✓ I r\ M TT <ti Cr) LC] C� ;-4 LEA 0 Z ro 3 91 it NAM. MLWl HEAT ARENA THE MAN HEAT ONE SL W Aa.n. SSA. 2300 MOK FLOREM 33131 TM. (305)5]]-Ule Fac (303)372-OBO2 A17�16T AMUIMCTMIca ON WHE FAX OOY MwM IrBRO•tIMF �`.ABBBNl1 •ro t•r ARlYYriw rB1a rBM Bp611111L00•IU.B St1t+ CaCBLAt�� Partners, Inc r 0•0. Bll•i4 0•ML.•Bl1L rM R.« mm- BB3pB1 MMMR 1110N13WTMiASM EIQJ®B s�bn/IBI� a BLA le BlrBll RAC(i aMCIMMTNOBlClEM N•rMl IB/MAIBT.R. A owB rws !]b• aaa �o A000•�vB ►LNYf Ati0G17B ��MM��i•a OOOJ1 BYEa.MA33A•0 A A7 w a m F.BI AJr WQJVBm•171.1 D�BDYIM• 1(',�'�7I YO d1b 1M��. �Yymrps.uY m IN KlAb.w.i ifNl W rs WOW rw RAND PLUMIER h ASSOCIATES INC. UT ItM CITY OF MIAMI LWAP. OEMGN OEVEUNWIE if PACKAGE NOT FOR MNb rRUCEION v.Nrtbr.,r.�r Itab. ■M U-Ia-f7 P17 --.1 Bna.n bvf6/ ". ISM- M9EB Kl/ mm s— Na Al .05 SUffE LEVEL a¢ 0 m cn 0 0 0 0 z fv 3-- LID O 11 LL- Q 3 1— I� U Ql a--1 LD U] 1— U Lu 7 O Q d r7 >liv f ,,vvvvv v°vv LE ,iAl,� ' WERE- m ark P��a r � - � � -• �� IIIIIIIIIC�- I' � ,' . �I�.I, J II II II II IJ ' J■■■ �■�■�������� J■■■ I IIII ....................... iL■■IL■■I �■■���������■ 1 III II II fi II II II r ..11{ �I';i' ��i� ' 'r., � 1 ... ....... . -._-..�i��: -�.-:r --' .:. = I `o II;I _III I 1 1 I ` ; 1 � �" " „� � I I i I I I "II —l;uuT r- �c1' I I I';�I f 1 • I nil II II II II -�Ilillii IJII {i ia' i�E ��� {��{ {ii II 11111111 II 11 L•'.1 � ��,. .� II I a� i - nunul Ire :� = WE . r--� = r� r ♦:_,��=�/If �� _ ice= ►��' �\,�'.. I _ _ ' rm• ML4M1 HEAT ARENA 'ME k" FEAT OIIE SE 3nl A — Slit. 73DO 1N41E RORM 33131 Tar. f3w)sn-as3e Fac (3wN'n-oeot AFCHW .11lr MMl rratna� Ald•ratw �-IOM kTo In'd P!tall c- m-- fMrC!EUFLwAR.mr rA aaaal MLp ayi FIIL171111Ll 7110FN10F7OlAEETI BK14M arr4W94A,WMWwL = s ra.. ra cwr RAM+ IOIIRCO•ILT10BOEE B w.Arl Ws W.w lm . mm_m �=�-- r�oaorAdw mwlmueo.r®Ar- - A]!0 ILIA 7!>M moeeoranlm k. 3M IM M Fu llr !•1 DAVID PLUMMM k ASSOCIATES INC. CITY OF MIAMI hLu.&P. DEMM CEVELOPMWT PACKAGE NOrFOR CONIFTRUCTICIN law Batty ll#-97 F .J.., "619 ➢•a_n ey6/A/VA/n A*— .919 IIVI/111• R.Aaion/Uat. sA.n wo Al .06 PPER CONCOURSE m TY] T\ O d LL Q a--1 O 3 F— U LO c17 F— U Lu -7 O CL 0- AN ItAM MLAMI HEAT ARENA TFE AGAM FEAT ONE SE W Ar.u., S1 730➢ MWA FLORIN 33131 Td: (303)177-437E E.. (30)377-OE02 rises AR7/1BCf AROUnFCTON/CA �aEfi aou mae FAX 000m-w IwN..NEYNf .I�iI.E.1 �.1.. MCNockA mcmc1WLO.EIENO rt2 rONNIY1rl.WL1E E.Rtam Ri t soon EtiIr WNO vmlcr Ell.G. THOWTO TL11AGETn BND«E �I!»M w1. = KC. 1BOa R4CK+QMCOGLLTMBK9lM ..1.m NSIOR..w 0. M 11N10m RF7. callow WNW- MKj&A,3M IM W.A W N..YE W IE.iA.O 1. iw]W Nib iw0.. 1A101'JR OO.LDIO 000E OO.l7MIE LJ�N h L. m MY.wi tNN ONlO M111lQ..i1 DAVID PLUM ER k ASSOCIATES INC. PH --K'itl-.is-�ti . FV RAN CITY OF MIAMI LLU.LP. DESM DEVELOPM@R PACKAGE NOT FOR CON9TRUCIION arN.r..rteNNNr 1 DNn U-16-i7 P.aJ.ct "Sig D�a.n bybVN/D4RA6 Approve. bgfl IIVR/RAl R..I.fwJDste sw.c N> Al .07 UPPER BALCONY I. m ti (D Cu V O O Lo O O Z Eu 3 N. it m. MIAMI HEAT ARENA 7hE k Ml HEAT ONE SE 31d Mw Slits 23W MMML FLORM 33131 Jd (WS)5n-U Ew: (305)372-0002 r�e+p NCHn T = Alt@ FAX mY VX-= .1�.6lI uwot.r hchNwyw arr.r .o�uMcow�vr S�ill`�Cand��k Pa�e2s�lnc. rmar aanwaR.aw wwriwbl w,ruaw[/rnawlacMcw w war raa. w.e �ma RACK+ WE C9 XTN0 BUEUS . M.AMNN;rMI.YC wM M[Ol. ,F1r OM. wMl1 foYf=.IIL R' wwm.ww �R11r AlOf7i i7B tl OID(YMfro1GY[am MMFW M e w w2r wl w 7bF2r cYerneaa.cnyw W w•r I.ROw — DAMD RUMIER & ASSOCIATES INC. KV RAN CITY OF MIAMI A&U.&P. MGM Dem-CWRA@R PAOCAGE NOT FOR CONSTFK.IanON I�wr ➢atn 0-06-97 P.o3ect NW619 O�a.n pyLY0./pAN6 .,ppnov.a b�B *Aunn N.Msion/qt. Lilt Ne Al .08 UPPER SEATING 2 = � n 0 0 cn a T T o rn ao :a 6i T O Ln O Ln � O z O z C Kv 3 Ev 3 N s-t O _J O V I J Q ui Q O � O 3 F— H F— U F--1 / U cn / c7 LO QT l0 I cn / F— U F, U D w O Q O d Q / d a D n 0 n 7] N CO m J Lo O O Z 70 OJ 0 as e KO C C it Mm0 MAMI HEATARENA TFE W MI FEAT ONE S.E. arE kw Sutr 2300 W&R. FLORUA 3]1]1 ]«: �X5,577-sa2e F- (30e)372-Dao2 /XLM= ARQUnECTONICA C0t0 M-W FAX 0 SSE' am IIBN!>O�LIY �� slalr�f�l rm amr AtMYROfn rsa rralr ..-mrft RYIIa k�ll laadea & P r CG.YY OrYCa?.rL ar81L 9M oro swa w trao w.o f111NGT111L 1111m1 D O WOFFTOLMM MNEE S RO AMY PNIIRYa IYl01tI NRtr tr rtim wfsl wrr wml RACK + K= coati►a BIGNMFIB rwwlJlC lfsRIISRtao ® arre w tap i� a�twmf rNoom�a]]Ir oWwaaoaewsfDaaArH[kmkO L.sPR�Lf�aUn $ .O,CfWVg iEb ar so IwF94• wwr $ INC. xvuR CfTY OF MLWI M.U.&P. DESIGN DEVAOPMENT PACKAGE NOT FOR OONb rRUOTION �Il.y..,r,r•nmr Issur Ltw a-a6-9] zJett —619 Dnarn Oy6tIaAMNR ovr0 byEB PWRJ" Rrvlrbn/pate sn.rt No A1.09 MECHANICAL a loot aR aY op WIN, 101 X, x ------------ 71---------_ $sav Imm-W w ------- ------- 4- — - — - — - — - — - — -- - — - — - — — - — - — - — - — — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — — - — - — - — - — — --7 ............ 7 ----- ----- - - — - — - — - — - — - - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - ------ --- -------- Ak x x '21 ---- ---------------- •4. .M 0-1 4, ROOF PLAN -7 Www" Lm LEGEND Arw Aw "IT cr IIAL Vet Lam raw OF IIAL A" • wm N.M pcw at. MIAMI HEAT AF434A THE MAM II -EAT m IL at =w. zm Ram Ta AMOMMUMFC4 ofta-m nu OO sea wt!j by- 7HIMICOMMASEM EMCFE91111 =U..0 -mmr! WOCEIIIIIIII R=+wmcoIILLlm arsww 111101141FAS11013AMI 70 OW� IL —116 = SM41 SIIIw mmw DAVID PLUMB & 4SOCUTF -NC, RI R•1 OEMM OEVELCPMENT PACKAGE NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION A-1.10 S n 0 �Z it Mma MLAM1 HEAT ARENA THE WA M HEAT ONE SE are M— Sul. 23M MWII, FLORIDA 3J131 Ul (Jm)bn-.ma Foi (2505)372-M2 ARL7/1ECf ARQU/TECpT�ON/C.4 M�x�Aarn lam V.,= sax o00 arrva Iltarmllaur •R1IAMINaR1 unlxatnA� Md1Y9mw IIIYa w911Yva aoRsm9naaeArwRr S�illu Candela k Partners�lnc. OO DOIYAI OIR W R 00111E OiBI! R L W Rao M9wR w a90 AP9p alaC11111L�m1 THCMTO fTCMASM ENaWEEM N AlY1E OKA1a1�Y1 NarltlRNx ROR m r1.Mo wm Ko YBSY®1 F= i RIM CON9LU M @IQEEG � AIp4 MANICIR m slam w m m1� aaeo®1 rRtooln�u991n � IIAIP A9BOCL1TEi e.ri�ww.re.b. ie an mwlRr Nue. ul[ 9m, la(LIA Nr a w ISIrD w w Irlw I.vorve mlunNa sort lnrurm a is ww sr OAVID PLUMMER § ASSOCIATES INC. 9EY RAII CITY OF MIAMI M.U.S.P. DMIGN DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NOT FOR CONBML=CN arll..Na..Apme..s h— bete n-N-97 P.p7 —619 D'— by6V ,W/K App--d b{FB KVa/PWI Rerlubn/Out. SM.i No. A4.01 ELEVATION cn a r-a 0 ti r*� Qi 0 Lo 0 0 z G� 3 Pat M�0 MU1MI HEAT ARENA 11-E WARY FEAT ONE S.E. 3,4 Avww.. Sut. 7700 MIWL RORDA 3313I lw5)577-4378 F- (30e)372-0w7 ARGIIE T aRouITECMNICA mB alb@ FAX MI) Q2-D7a Ma1�LTNlf ��a1Ra�MnKEi aaarmna AlaNlealan iawaaaasa ao�s+uMLnaRUDRa S.illis Candela & Putners` Inc. a 1101RAa nY1MEL OaNL WLL� aL D>0a Ran wai IMaDm .oaaR aRLNYLIDama THOR TCWTCMAGEM 64GREE 4 M RMEDPaE WRAa R110R ROR m IINIIO l.I 0, YFllYml RACE+ KLNQ C0161LTN09K!®IS *p MmtaaRRW m aDe.a mm— aalaaDaasa Kw�eY'a.o� rwmaDDRAnn == M�R'IW mw..kMXA e mmm mmwr L7mrrneaasu7aaa m0e maauana KN �O FAIm aaFaaM OAVIO PLUMLO k ASSOCIATES INC. �auN CITY OF MIAMI ALU.&P. DMIGN MIEL.OPM EW PACKAGE NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION arar.r�w.. oa.r Issur Detr n-06-97 PnoJ.c< No9619 Dnn.n lVa3/aNAll/D6 Rppnov.0 MPFa NVK/"M ReN.bn/O.<n Snert s10 A4.02 ELEVATION C- Cn CV m 0 En O O Z a3 7 f— Mw 0oil .tiT_Y T I tt' i.. ♦ Se'd ieR - Y KW. 1YU11( NUWAN PVE1 Mf01 .nr-n• imt ® ®® ® I. ® ®® __ NAME AF9WMWf N.IG. ® ® b tlASS AH1W ® ® L t' S.SC-Y 9flE lE`.tl �i end mw. vuu' -'.n'-9' nricrl¢ mw1 bi ♦t1'd' OhlI1 LIM 1 N -? vAtIO tMl aNvo[ sn6Ei � IER nu'.nE (aN[ r+rtYE OOYN G1E l9Y& Gv9L'E Ml1t D91M GlE QEAST ELEVATION 4.0 SCALE i'-30'-O' w a 30• ,s w• r� MIAMI HEAT ARENA TFE MAM FEAT ONE S.E 3,d Av.rw.• S«M 23DO NMY4 LOMA 33131 T«: (30J)v'n-a32a F.. (305)1n-0602 AIEMW MQU?FCMyNL/CA C90 .!-M FAX CM V24M rreeNUTN. Aware... �.. a..+■ Nom6f.M11LL eaWKLDM S!Lm IamL k PL en lnc. OOOAYI�WR mILO�i Rf01 O,Ni w ws eACIKm.ml 7HOWFOW70MAWM ENME38 M iiI!OF/f Momm IIl K00ll m DNA wm,= I@mlml RAGA i QM COWLTWO BOHM A�!lMAIaCIRIP m eeso wm s�A DILL mm . — M.�nlMIP� AATEI �IYv s CIDfY1/fIOIRYF>1D.ILa01ANI0 m �m wm 2i]N LY�.9lCU�I,TMq RtZ 64L113M16 faMl.n1� Y4erper.t�p i.e dne. r�aM« a �s wm ,rr OAND RUYIEH h ASSOCIATES INC. ITT RAN CITY OF MIAMI Lc"P. DEEM OEVE]APMEW PACKA¢ NOT FOR DONS Ruanom �1««+rwrMe•er 1A1 O.Ie II_OL-�) —ject N :1619 ore. er a/r/olrrAc rorovea sera r/a/nM 3tw1 N.. A4.03 ELEVATION Im r- Qn a) 'I .-1 LD Q 0 Lf-) O C3 z a 03 3 n M IY r. Iki'-11' i.OA. -'• iox ornY Sd $rPPs .1 i al G .1L11111V11 PNIll } 575r01 .ttt-lt• IptSR SFAT ® .m•-Y weal m.c } 2� S�hJ�—� EMw wxarcic 4111111G iR1di ® ti � ., �.Ii' • YMN f91L 2 -r Mm � 2.Ir-F• twrt uu >r .r-o• r� (2)WEST ELEVATION A4 SCALE 1'=30'-D' IN 0 30' ♦3' Ro' It rm MWAI HEAT ARENA TFE 160M FEAT ONE SE 3rd A— SWI 2300 NWIL FLORCA 33131 TM'. (.W),577-ALR Fa. (303)372-OR07 r✓e� �+.aw ARDNIRT a"unfcroivica �M � aR•R FAx � R �� d11R�yR1 Anl.RFrrw mR✓: n rmF� noslwLOmLUR S.T lagda k Piers Inc. FaRmrRrmmNLdwlatim ® dNa w®ws mFowimal 7HO KMN-Tg1AIMM BKR43M mRe. �mWLKm R— wmw leoml RACK+ OWZ CMMIUVQ BIG dNMAORlm1RR1.m m Rldm wm mm a�soml F�RROCmLTIR�R PIEMW AEDCKIM -0DOOIFm101 �IRRRD,IR®IAM�I m ).2w wm ]RF71Y Lvn.m 0RLLTYRR OOOEEO�LTNRR w_ •� rya. wwun. `mpu.n.e tie K L.w.b. 111wevi RNI �� wm wa1 AW DAVID PLUMW-R k ASSOCIATES INC. RES FWI MY OF MIAMI 2Au.s.P. DESIGN DeA3DPAENT PACKAGE NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION a.A.R..R. /r seer I.en )bY O-Yb-SI PnoJect Fb9619 - O.= n bnN4NAR'A0 App M bYFS nV11RN R..nrwn/Mt. ShNF � A4.04 ELEVATION r- Q) Q) LO eli Eyi Ln O O Z m 3 (LONGITUDINAL SECTION l.20 SCALE 1'=30'-O' it rm MIAMI HEAT ARENA THE ARAM HEAT OW 5E 3N A, S.R. 3300 UWA FLORM 33131 To (3M)5n UM r.. (M),1T1-OD00 AR111BLT jCWU/TFW N/CA c>oo ar.e FAX am m-u 86-� ".— .EI m AId1Y(iw mvs Aladan IL OwII/lA Iv1E��8Dd pafters,rI11C. 6001K.r NYIiL Ow. mJt R. iY O Mw fY� K•w fIItCYLLwlw 7lIDMDtF701AET11 ��� YwI�PNI1R.r I�10KKw m iKr rYm .iW IBwlw FLACK +aM CO®L1NO BKHM aKblecl mw— m aawlml nbooau.urYs 2 PAW A39=77® �mDgIwMID.YR>m.wwMO w mm ruw >f>N 1,vm�melv+•n moeaou3nK .�.t..�.� k l..w...n..wl •3W W w Ruw .a. DAND RUMMER 3 ASSOCUTES INC. MY RAIL CITY OF MIAMI MLU &P. DEMM DEVB.OPMEW PACKAGE NOT FOR CON6TnLoanoN Yr.rr...YYr 1..w Detw u-Y-n Pno3.ct No9619 Dn..n byH/UpAIr.6 .ppnevM bYfD MVt/IL. 9.vinon/pct. SMrt 11u A4.20 SECTION I rn LD 6 v of 0 0 0 z a CD 3 W it a MIAMI HEAT ARENA Tif AAAIA FEAT ONE SE 3d AVM SIR, 23DO YAML FLORM 33131 7.1: f-_ "-ane re. WS)M-W2 r.mti AFC S3 AMIMECTONICA CM WkAR FAX ... m.i7.N AMIYD�w MwM mKwaFLm O«a wm) Wi NmoiwLamml DEMTO fTauASrn SCRAM' r�raN/IRwIrHRRm m A>wiee sAt m rm 1BlO� RARi QW COBLTNOBK!®9 m na rv<m A1» aasoAs rYoom�am sl mmrN.pwu[NN, INlOtAM d • 7t71v N[� ?lull IINO!!I! LmLTNw ue Doti �rwy K I M 111..eui i%N NN !r /AtrO irl PHwoo awu�x & rssacurEs inc. =w:eFs,,%-- MY FLAN CITY OF MIAMI M.u.&P. GEmm Demomaa PACKAGE NOT FOR CONGTRL)a ION rrN.�,ir.rAo..r Itvn D.0 I1-06-97 vroJ.ct No9619 Dni.n eyit/N/DNHG Approved eppD IIVI/R�N 4.NavJD.<• LvK 11p A4.21 SECTION (NORTH ARENA DRIVE) AMERICAN AIRLINES ARENA T gLVD• pOR + + t<<e FFCRgILw � I NE6ST _ • C 1ft • r LL, KAIL W A I � IL ATED PEDESTRIAN CROSSING LEGEND NE 5 5T J • • = SIGNALIZED 1NTERSEMCINS — — — — — — BAYSIDE OVERHEAD SIGN SERUCrURE RAHROAD GATE LANE USAGE NOVEMBER 07. 1997 d DAV I D PLUMMER a ASSOCIATES INC. AMERICAN AIRLINES ARENA P ® TRANSPORTATION CIVIL - STRUCTURAL ENV IRONA£NTAL PORT BLVD CORAL GABLES FORT LIYERS PALM REACH CONCEPTUAL ACCESS PLAN l rfa IaCO R LEM KO calla arlES IL R 31 T[LErMpE 11as1 4n-M00 BE CH 444-ssrs AMERICAN AIRLINES ARENA 7. Landscape Plvm .�rt{Rfl H{f:i1l[:�tfl i MS{f�� 7*r!ti{��►:' .ifNf{r. 'iiR�i#Fi14{� :!�iR%1tt�fl - viw�ir�_.._ arrYQur..YQri�ra r�.s=�.u► n�iu.sira, +.��. Y+s ♦ lN4 sire Un Mim iL - iu tas�ii Ys{ w'Al �i i wdw;�a r.. - t aitYw isH{ r .a w r�q r •.�, wirQa .. .Q Yr Q.IT•r.� d+Ii�•L�[ N►. L� iH Y.oi1 ifGH�•ttasiY4 nrY iasrll(tlriAffi'b.. _ = �sf�f/4►frtF.@Ir @o ��a..i► w* 1"25 i..:irh1 =41, .ia24"r l�:YIYIr- lYO�ii.QNHIiWHN—iH1i�KfrY�L.i�)1. f % `i `II' �t�'-'i S�Ii�IIIIf ?iII]i��I�II�i ®10� II3�II� CL�1l i 4iiltIIII QII,'i�l ►`IIII:II Og►��6�II�a �d�II9+Q�ED�.'�QID4�.. _.�i AM w■ a _x{Y !s Fixq uY�.+� YYa u pir{I{.tHYlfirS/ID F. t{Y11s/<n�E{i Jfs7N� /'wp� i��R'i.I.M ilea. li' �1 i�{{�Igjim1i �iID3''ZZlt'�i'■Y1' r .'B IDi ai�i`� �3 3� @S�QAii-E S--r`�5 FOR GRADING IN THIS AREA SEE CIML DRAW14GS JAMk SITE "A" z+MwM ` FOR GRADING IN THIS AREA OR GRADING IN THIS AREA SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS LEGEND u •no.m a,mc FOR GRADING/N. SEENC E"B' I, , MRj MLA Al HEAT ARENA THE MIAMI HEAT 011E S.L 3,d SnM. 25i0 n" MMM ILCAW 33131 tM: (3M)577-.328 F- (30M)372-OM Ma/lma AAOMWCT e p p e (305) 372 - 1812 FAX (305) 3772 1�175 INMA CusuTMT ��1F�1•aISMafrAlVny 9E1 A7CIIYOWA (MOF�3Y PAS .Mo.xcnwu wLv.iula am OULU MIME CORIL O.dS R 3Mx (MMI NfnMI FM (J06) Ml-JYJ saxpak Mom THORNTON-TOL'ASETTI ENGINEERS W AM" OF 11E A�Ma K ,LL ` K W. MM (02) Yl _"MrA3 �]t1) OIO-924 Y VM FLAY k KURTZ VM-RNG ENGINEERS 2) MFtfl'(1pIC MY,m1 2Ip I M a4 P4F71C COMMtmm tDkaRWaMm .P reASSOOATES e,Mrrsb 77.!Dp an Farm MW,D, yn7 7 •w[aw Mr u 13,U 7MLTIAFA3191. 7N-Ida INaSLVE t0119ATMR KEY PLAN CE&W OEVELOPNBNr PAO,iM:E FIM POPI (xw*mXIQIION G�m11yM�I�MMt�r L.v LSe F7f-4! Appmw 1kA I Gvm bn �M Approve! try-MMk Rev,son/Bert SM.t Nu I M GRADING PUN 5 O DELONI% RECTA 30'-40' HT. 20' -25' SP. 12' GAT. SPECIMEN, FLORIDA FANCY 16'-18' OA, 8'-10' SP, 5'-6' CT 43 { PONGAMIA PINNATA FLORIDA FANCY, MATCHED GROWNr, 56 O ROYSTONEA ELATA 0'-35' OA M4TCHED ANCY 16 COCOS IIUCIFERA 'GREEN A7ALAYAN' FCOINNTAJNER '-18'A128® -2ti OA 300 SFCROVN0000£RS 2' FULL, 12' OC I II v I �000i�.e%� o 000 oo-.ao o.0 0 0.0 0 0.0.0 0 0 0.0-•0 0.0.0 0 0•ooaoo 0000.0 0 0.0.0 0.0 �.00000-� 000- •ono 0000 o- .�.0 0 0.0 � 000000e%o-.000 I� 0-0 o °_°a p D�d��l o 1D a .� � O O 1�7 .a�'�ry�ri OJ J CI ' Et+ '',n;nfpml, n, nu IIII YO1'1 WANTtt SYMBOI DESCRIPTION SPECIFICATIONS QUANTITY 10L DESCRIPTION � CATIONS 30 O} BJRSERA SIMARUBA 12'-14' % 5'-7' SP FLORIDA p OR BETTER 113 � COCOS NUCIFERA 'GREEN MgLAYAN' 3' GW, 16'-18' OA 20 S B' CW, 24'-28' OA 1g200 SF Q SiRU85 3 CAL, 24' HT, T4' OC 14,600 SF ® GRWNDCOVERS 1 CAL., 12' FULL, 12' OC MIAMI HEAT ARENA THE MIAMI HEAT ONE YIY i1�AR�, 33Ji�31 FLOOR Trh ()a6)57T-4318 FdC (705)373-OEOI wr.. r.�rrw (3O8) FA%72-1173 wou aaYATwR [�� a■ 1♦iRYYM LR, AIOhNI�r uPv�a � MIX�sr eRavuYau NA'aTIMR em mlaAs Draw¢ mrw as4 ti v,x. saucYaR. ocv¢t THOaJTON-TCNASETTI ENGINEERS ea urvx a nc wnrwt ran T(tq M. roa, (zW as-aaoFu (ztA t�v:y YFP OOFfA Futx R KURrz CONSULTWG ENGINEERS t1s sa aov[ lcv raK W. ,ea] ay srt-vsaFu (nzl wv-nav P•mre COIRLTMIS �iA1p ASSP7ATES /ila M uOM� bra 110 a0 Oaaal' R014 9R ]'s-THe A). YHQA Iff 11 (ay nY-nuFu {aq Iw06GY4 COBALaR =�s KEr nAH ��OIN1O6VHnPABtf PACIVIQt IMW PDR �rowlm"LlalloV 4u itw U-7IA7 ►ro)rCS Ntlib19 Dr.rn bn WM Approved by4tM R.Nsrm/Yr4 fr..r> wx W.V 1 f �.f7n 11NS ram, ror. �S w LEGEND SYMBOL SYSTEM .,,,. SYSTEM A E3SYSTEM B In SYSTEM C ® I SYSTEM D SYSTEM A WILL BE A CONVENTIONAL SYSEM USING BUBBLERS, SPRAY HEADS AND ROTOR HEADS. ALL ROYAL PALMS SHALL HAVE TWO BUBBLERS AND SHALL BE ZONED SEPARATELY. .ALL COCONUT PALMS SHALL HAVE ONE BUBBLER AND S10ULD ALSO BE ZONED SEPARATELY. THESE BUBBLERS WIL- BE USED FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE COCONUT PALMS AND IN EXTREMELY DRY PERIODS DURING THE YEAR. SYSTEM B. C AND 0 WILL BE DRIP IRRIGATION SYSTEMS. SEE MEP DRAWINGS FOR WATER SOURCE LOCATIONS. 1� a �'�,'Ct✓$ 1i:� Aff' J•SaJTaSt�2a�.,J='] SITE "A" 1 a ...................... .ram .,...... ................ ........; .. ........, .......,,., ._......................._ \ f�............ ... U t Me t"M HEAT ARE 4A THE MIAMI HEAT ONE SE M WIX0, 23M Rune NNN RORIF ssvT I*, (71n1>n-,52e F®: {aoslr2-oeo2 w AQomcT d (3D5) 372 - tel2 FAX J06; NOM pYB►ilNf MI®WN 911[1 F11[6 �, Y] YP➢ AIdIWe• (�'sTa �� NIO�nCMVI WNAILTafiS SM! Cantt ! Par(aen Ine. 2 ]ITN (m) NI-MMF'r(301 R&07W smwviA nNaanl THORN TON-TOMASETTI ENGINEERS NI A"A O H AWWAS ")0M NY. WI {m) Y2FNODFAt{ (rA els-azr FLACK t NLRTZ CONSULTMG ENGINEERS ♦n sM AXE Mr nsc NY. mN) (ZM Sit MFAI I22) swab PNMMe OPSUANTTS ARAW ASSOCIIAATTEESt� e tln aA� Mfa"Y la yR w, 1•En,\ NY n (SN) 73.1-M7FN (to Iss-Tell WI•e0J/E OUI•ATAIM �s RR CM M.TMITe aaN. G...rIMN. howm.uJ el LeW. MINa.I W (MQ NI-ecv FAIL (Sn 9M-014 FEY PUN D� PACKAGE NM PCP' 3CNBiAJGTM INVI'alrNrlerwww•�Is M sales r: aF.. 4 App— N A1Pwr M\ MR aYR el► L4.01 LIGATION FLAN AMER(CAN AIRLINES ARENA 8. Sign Plan i lA TF. F 6 il l AIW110011011,11e' 0 AA Arena Logo Camera -Ready Artwork -color, printed application PMS 28i Blue or Black I�4i o 114��11 ��� .IIIIIII i"II �' II li,; lullll'd IIfiIrY ill �II��I '� . 1 gull III m1114�11I ry �VI a� lhil 11'�I��I!ll II I'I Ili II :II a�� I r'� `•,��"�'a��uh 1 II lul� �I�II���ltllll * �` IPA d�l'a h p II m' III r r, kN" afCjB.. cn; ,�,.� �� II �I I I�. II tl I OII1'yllll '1a''n All "I FA •'�► � , ,�� 1 a M� 14 III' i'I�j� 1 �i� 9 d n 'IIII III I I h a �"- •'r. �I 191FIV NIiIV,:l Ni�lp,� 1 J 71°�I q�'ti t�'. a i, rlt 4. °' l�"'.,r Ear 101 ^AY.'I„ N� i � �41IIYIII � 1 '\;'1 ,II k ,• II dp bill Ai. Y�. �, l I III IIIiIiIIhIIaIII'i�il � r^ � II I�'�II��III;II��II law' .,,��,,,•-� I I Ak, s�✓� .� +' 11141111 illlllllllllll // IIII III�1 ':r�l C'lrll"� u � / rr r"y h�• I III pll I r ppII L ��" (IIII � Il hlli 4 11 III I rrr I I I N II 'il III 19 II 1ti- I �II I I d 'Y�.+14 ' �J^ � �• 9 01 I I I 'dye,. � I �w• 14i .�±� dF lllp l I I I II II I L' ip I �I uili it �I I �k , II d II rt4 wit :, y�, I M IIIp�I 11II IIII �, ICIa11 I I �', 'I,II.I! pul� _ r IAfx I I, I � I i I i 11 IIJI I� I �{Il,i � Nrl III I I I' I 71 '__ III!III If ICI I I'I I IIjIII�Nd f I I lii� II �I� � II'u ii III IIII�1 III,I,, �p @' I'll Till Idlllall I, 77 _ I l (I - � I _ L 1 II II I ICI � ICI I, II c� I I 'I Illy III I I il' d _ i I C I q Id; tW.. I '" —__ � � r � Ihllllm�lll, l�l Illl�llll�dl', �I�II ' � I 4'I I I I{i'Ilpll 111 llllillllllll NI,II �. III Ill IIII�II' I �I IpN I I., I I III I I , Flld � II J k.upl III'. � I Ii t -- ^%4 I _t ;; <� I IIII v4d 1�1'111 IIIII 1','d I ' I Illyld { N7N�h III � III I III I I% II li pp IIIIII 1II IppI''p ALhi I�IJI I'M'I'JhII M!h G��l�l� , II I I `` 1 h ",P rw Ii III � I l� IF `IIII 'IVI II 'IIIII h I 'I'll IIII u gr Ila l hrlh,l 7n :i h III I�I'I .I' �I�I�n ICI IIII I IIIII II �r J ar' l, GlV 'III h y 1I I , Yh, I III I I Ti 7 d1 II Ih I L I :p "ti r r III ^II II ,I�II�II� IIIIII, 111 n�I I ptFh1IIVlI�I�III!ri�"�,F,III11H�� ,�I�TIui�u I,I;�Il�ul�lll �I. Ij+Tfillli p Ik rd: I�" III PI � i pinr II I h h' I I I I krl6 I I111uI 16'+I III III II I 'IIX�diiu 1414r�iIWI gII��1 Ilk � IIJ� I I rH�,'96y�'u �IIIII�IIIyII III �il�l�4hI�I'�I�IIIIIIIII IIIigpl�l �:. asp' Vull�a�hNIIIINIIeII ,,IIj�III dill I y "kai k IN �I II Il' II qI i4' �III�I " ,,• I I li p� I di I Il'rl III, IIII!I� dI � II I I �I i � F4 �. �eyGy't"•" �' �� it III IV @@ f �t I, �j �II lil Tyr' w h , s , s r h 4� 0 44fI? \ 1r 1 ' • t