HomeMy WebLinkAboutM-98-0591CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA 29
INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO : Honorable Mayor and Members DATE June 3, 1998 FILE
of the City Commission
SUBJECT: Section 8 Moderate Rehab Project
FROM a d WarShaw REFERENCES: Commission Meeting
City Manager ENCLOSURES: June 9, 1998
Presentation by Police and the Administration on the area located at Northwest 6 1 ' Street between
Northwest 12``' Avenue and 15`" Avenue.
98- 591
The Honorable Mayor and
Members of the City Commission
Donald H. Warshaw
City Manager
June 9, 1998
Model City Target
Housing
An April 8, 1998 letter from Circuit Court Judge Thomas K. Petersen (see Attachment A)
to Rene Rodriguez, Director of the Miami -Dade Housing Agency, has prompted the need
for urgent action. The Judge presented a detailed list of concerns regarding the living
conditions in the housing units located at NW 61" Street between NW 131h and 14t
Avenues and at NW 58th Terrace, NW 59th Street and NW 131h Place in the King Heights
and Orchard Villa communities.
Five (5) of the buildings referenced in Judge Petersen's letter are under contract with the
City of Miami under the Section 8 Moderate Rehabilitation Program of the U.S.
Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). In May 1988, the City of
Miami was awarded approximately $33,000,000 in funding for this program.
The Section 8 Moderate Rehabilitation Program provides rental assistance to the owners
of multifamily apartments, who provide affordable housing to low income tenants in the
City, for a fifteen -year (15) period. The rental assistance under the Miami grant was
targeted to the owners of existing multifamily apartment buildings, which required
substantial rehabilitation in order to bring the substandard structures into code
compliance. The City was awarded rental assistance for 420 low-income families and
individuals for the provision of affordable housing in the neighborhoods of Model City
(140 units), Little Havana (214 units), and Overtown (66 units).
The Section 8 Moderate Rehabilitation Program restricts the tenant(s) to a specific
apartment building(s) that are under contract with the U.S. HUD for a period of fifteen
years.
On April 17, 1998 Mr. Rudy Perez, Director of Private Rental Housing for the Miami -
Dade Housing Agency, forwarded a copy of the Judge's letter to the City. A meeting
between representatives of the City's Community Development Department, the Miami -
Dade Housing Agency, and Judge Petersen was held on May 6, 1998. Following this
meeting, Commissioner Arthur E. Teele, Jr., whose District encompasses this area, was
given a total briefing. The Commissioner in turn arranged a series of meetings between
City officials and residents, including inspections of the buildings. During the first
meeting, Saturday, May 23, 1998, which was reported in the Miami Herald on Sunday,
May 24, the residents complained of rats, mice, roaches, ants, snakes, water leaks, unsafe
98- 591
stair railings, sagging floors, bullet holes, un-repaired structural damages, faulty
equipment and a lack of maintenance. At a subsequent meeting, the residents complained
about the violence, crime and open drug dealing in their neighborhood.
Representatives from the Departments of Community Development, Planning, Police,
and Parks and Recreation, along with the Model City NET Administrator have been
meeting to implement a short-term plan of action as well as an intermediate and long-
term plan. The initial proposals for immediate action and subsequent actions are outlined
in the attached materials.
We are, additionally, reviewing Judge Petersen's questions about the appropriateness of
the selection of these properties for the Section 8 Moderate Rehabilitation Program; the
City and County inspection processes; the authorized rents for the apartments; and, the
ability of the women living here to receive other forms of housing assistance.
The problems in this neighborhood are long-term and historic in their development.
Ultimately, those bearing the greatest impact are the children. Presently, over 200
children under the age of 18 are living in these buildings. The need for change is critical.
We recognize that a significant investment of time and resources will be required.
You will find attached City staffs proposed short-term, intermediate and long-term plans
for the areas of concern, as well as the over-all economic development needs of the
neighborhood. Additionally, there are fact sheets providing special information about the
King Heights and Orchard Villa communities (see Attachment B) and the properties,
owned by the Miami Limited II Project (see Attachment Q.
DHW:CMC:GCW:db
98- 591
PROPOSED PLANS OF ACTION:
SHORT TERM:
Immediate actions are proposed to take place within the next 10 to 30 days.
• Inspections: The severity of the conditions requires an immediate 100% inspection
of all referenced facilities. Staffing levels and capacity in the Department of
Community Development have precluded the implementation of an effective and
thorough inspection schedule for these buildings. In past practice, inspections were
being conducted when tenants moved or on an annual and as needed emergency
basis. This inspection schedule has clearly failed to meet the needs of these Section 8
facilities. Following the implementation of a 100% compliance to code inspection
review, a quarterly, plus as -needed, schedule will be implemented and maintained.
Additional staff will be hired as quickly as possible to maintain this schedule.
• Abatement: The City will immediately move to invoke our authority to collect and
hold the tenants subsidized rental payments until satisfactory arrangements are made
with the owner to correct all structural and compliance infractions of City codes and
regulations. If compliance is not reached within a sixty-day period, the City can and
will remove the entire building or the individual unit from the contract with the
owner.
City guidelines for complying with HUD Housing Standards dictate when the City
will invoke and release abatement measures based on (1) structural and
environmental, (2) health, and (3) safe and sanitary issues.
The City will assess the matter of density so that families will be assured that the unit
they are renting is adequate for the size of the family. Current square footage of the
units range from 400 to 700 square feet in the one bedroom, one bath and the two
bedroom, one bath units, which is significantly short of the required footage for a
family of four. This density is a mitigating factor that will cause the City to take other
measures to re -locate the family. The City will work with Miami -Dade County HUD
to secure a voucher for other housing. The City will additionally assess other special
circumstances, as in the case of some form of disability, where the issue of
accessibility will be a further measure of judging the adequacy of the space.
• General clean up of all common areas and surrounding areas: The owner will be
required to work with their private collections provider to collect all trash and debris
from the immediate housing area and to maintain a regular schedule of collections to
avoid any trash buildup in compliance with code enforcement. Arrangements will be
made with the City's Department of Solid Waste to ensure the removal of trash and
debris from the surrounding areas and to maintain those areas on a regular schedule.
The owner must make arrangements to ensure that the fumigation of all structures is
completed and maintained on a monthly and as needed schedule. The NET code
98-- 591
enforcement unit will monitor the schedules of collection of trash and the fumigation
of structures. Arrangements will be made for the repair and painting of any
deteriorated finishes and a general overall painting of the facilities.
To ensure safe and sanitary conditions the trash containers located at the site must
meet NET code enforcement regulations of adequate capacity to contain trash
between scheduled pick-ups. Due to the lack of green space and high crime, parents
keep children within the housing area. The courtyards are the only open space for
recreation. Therefore, placement of the containers will be determined to provide
maximum use of the courtyard space as a recreational area for the children. The
containers may be cordoned off within the courtyard or placed outside the courtyard
if regulations permit. The assurance of open space for the children will be ensured
through the monitoring by code enforcement.
• Coordinating Association: An Association composed of representatives from the
tenants, from ownership/management, Model City NET and other City Departments
will be formed to provide planning, coordination and oversight of these corrective
actions.
• Security and Management: The City is responsible for providing a safe and secure
environment for the community. Increased Police presence is being arranged for the
community. The owner of the properties is responsible for providing a safe and
secure environment in and about those properties. The owner will be required to
provide on -site security as well as on -site management, ensuring easy access to
management and security personnel.
• Community Services Center: This will be a priority to be implemented as quickly as
the various components can be brought together. In the initial assessment it has been
determined that an immediate coordination of social and support services, and a
stronger visibility of City services is required. The City has requested and the owners
have agreed to identify a facility within the communities that can be obtained to be
utilized as a Community Center. Until that Center is identified and completed the
owner has agreed to the use of vacant units, if feasible, in the short term. If this is not
an effective solution the City will bring in mobile units to be placed on vacant lots in
the community to provide the social services as well as City Police, Code
Enforcement and NET services. The Center will be a focus for beginning the
economic revitalization of the neighborhood. The Center will be a source for such
services as job counseling, the coordination of a variety of activities for the children
and support services for working parents.
INTERMEDIATE:
The goal is to Develop a Community Strategic Plan to set the format for the long-term
goals. Some components of this Plan will be:
• To assist in the goal to develop additional space for parks and recreational facilities,
and to improve the environment, actions will include:
Designing street R/W landscaping and beautification projects.
Acquiring property to expand African Square Park and to create other green spaces.
• To assist in the goal to provide affordable housing for low and moderate income
residents, actions will include:
Identifying properties for single family scattered site housing development for home
ownership.
Downzoning of some multi -family areas to single family areas (from R-3 to R-2).
Applying for waivers in resource restrictions to utilize new HUD Rehab loan
requirements (minimum square footage, landscaping, reduce density) to follow new
HUD Rehab design guidelines and standards.
• To assist in the goal of economic development and job creation for the area, actions
will include:
Developing plans for a Business Corridor focusing on commercial properties along
NW 62"d Street and NW 17`h Avenue. Plan expanded commercial activities to NW
61" Street, between NW 121h to 14`h Avenues, excluding the proposed park
expansion.
Filing applications for funding from other sources to augment HUD funding.
• To assist in the goal of providing other community enhancements for the area,
actions will include:
Recommending and implementing traffic calming techniques and/or street closures
for the residential areas.
98- 591
LONG TERM:
Long-term goals (5 years) are focused on a full-blown economic development plan to
expand and enhance business development, entrepreneurial opportunities, employment,
and home ownership. Components will include:
• Full development of the Business Corridor incorporating commercial properties along
NW 62"d Street and NW 17`}' Avenue.
• Finalization of the expansion of commercial activities to NW 61" Street, between
NW 12`h and 14`h Avenues.
• Conversion of HUD Rehab properties from rental to condominium for home
ownership.
• Completion of several units of single family scattered site housing and continued
development.
• Completion of green spaces for recreation.
98- 591
Attachment A
CIRCUIT COURT
ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA
THOMAS K. PETERSEN
CIRCUIT JUDGE
April 8, 1998
Rene Rodriguez, Director
Miami Dade Housing Agency
1401 N.W. 7th Street
Miami, Florida 33125
Dear Rene:
3300 K.W. 27 - AVE.
MIAMI, FLORIDA 33142
I am writing to request your guidance and assistance in addressing a troubling situation
which I discovered in the course of hearing one of my delinquency cases in Juvenile Court three
weeks ago.
The case involved charges against a young man who was a suspect in a drug sale on N.W.
61 st Street between 13th and 14th Avenue. The young man was chased into an apartment at
1370 N.W. 61st Street by the police. Although the police did not have any authorization to enter
the apartment, their argument was that the apartment building was public housing and that
therefore the tenants did not have the same rights as private tenants in privately owned buildings.
Their argument was that these tenants had waived their right to privacy and illegal searches by
virtue of their living in public housing.
My knowledge of the area led me to conclude that the buildings in question are privately
owned buildings and that the only nearby public housing project is the Liberty Square project to
the north of 62nd Street. My nine years as a Judge in juvenile court, coupled with my years
working in the Liberty City community, made me acutely aware of the fact that the street in
question, N.W. 61st Street, between 13th and 15th Avenue, is one of the most dangerous and
violent streets in Dade County and a street which has been historically characterized as an open
air drug market, it being one of the three or four most active drug sales areas in Dade County.
Following the hearing 1 learned to my dismay that 1370 NAV. 61 st Street was in fact a
Section 8 moderate rehab building and, additionally, that 1320 N.W. 61 st Street and 1321 N.` '_
61 st Street, situated on the same violent and drug infested street, are also Section 8 moderate
rehab buildings contracted to the same landlord as 1370 N.W. 6 I st Street. 1 later learned that at
least three more apartment buildings in the same area (1230 N W. 5Sth Terrace, l 501 N.W. 59th
Street, and 6217 N.W 13th Place) are also Section 8 moderate rehab buildin,-,s in the same h1uh
crime area owned by the same person. v -
98 591.
As you know, that particular area, which has historically been known as "Germ Ciro' (:or
obvious reasons) in the community since the mid-1960's has always been the most concentrate^
area of crime, poverty and drug sales in Dade County, matched only by one or two other areas in
Dade County's inner city community. My concern stimulated by the case relates to the fact tl at I
find it difficult to understand how the federal government would subsidize housing in an area that
makes it virtually impossible to raise children in a healthy and normal fashion. My conversations,
summarized below, with mothers who live in these buildings represent a horrifying litany of tares
of gun shot wounds, continual violence, open drug sales at all times of the day or night, a
complete lack of security for residents and children and a continuing danger to infants and young
children who must live and play in this area.
My continuing inquiries into the nature of moderate rehab section 8 indicates further that
the women who reside in these apartment buildings cannot leave them and are not permitted to
obtain vouchers with which they might move out of the area into more suitable places in whica to
raise children. The women who are forced to reside there without the option of leaving are
understandably despondent as well as angry over their plight. This plight is exacerbated by the
fact that, apparently, the landlord/owner of these apartment buildings receives $500 a month for a
very small one bedroom apartment and up to $700 a month for a similarly small two bedroom
apartment as the Section 8 rent for these apartments. The rents, as you know, go directly from
the federal housing agency to the landlord/owners. The women argue, quite plausibly, that with
rental monies of between $500 and $700 for tiny one or two bedroom apartments that they could,
if permitted vouchers, elect to live in a safe and healthy place in which to raise their children.
At that point I spoke with two women who lived in the 1370 N.W. 61st Street building
and offered to meet with several other mothers who reside in these apartment buildings since v
these two women indicated that not only was the overall environment on the street unsafe and
hazardous, as it has been for the last twenty years, but that the conditions in the apartment
buildings were equally deplorable. I agreed to meet with these women at Charles Drew
Elementary School last week and expected that perhaps a half dozen women would appear for
this early evening meeting. Much to my surprise a total of fifty-five female heads of househol
who reside in these properties came to the meeting. I learned that the properties are all owner
and operated by a limited partnership with the name of Miami Limited II, which is in turn
controlled by a corporation by the name of Armart Inc. Both Miami Limited II and Arman Inc_
list only one director and officer, by the name of Aristides Martinez, and both entities give their
address as 401 Miracle Mile, Suite 302, Coral Gables. That office in turn is operated by a
mortgage broker firm by the name of Art Martinez Interests. I assume that Armart Inc. represents
a contraction of the name Art, or Aristides, Martinez.
At the meeting the women who appeared briefly presented some of their complaints and
concerns regarding the properties they are forced to live in this inner city crime infested
neighborhood. All of the women who appeared were African -American and some indicated to me
that they had been denied the opportunity to live in other areas, such as Section 8 housing, on Red
Road, which is a predominantly Hispanic community. The fact that all of the women who reside
in these apartments are African -American would certainly present a great concern if, in fact, the
majority of the women in Hispanic Section 8 apartments in much better neighborhoods and
98- 591
the same rental value, excluded African -Americans.
Another concern that the women voiced was the fact that the fair rental value of similarly
situated apartments in the 61 st Street area were significantly lower than the $500 to $700 a month
being paid for the one or two bedroom apartments in these buildings. For example, the rents
being asked at the apartment building at 1606 N.W. 58th Terrace, are alleged to be $200 per
month for a one bedroom and $350 for a two bedroom apartment, according to the women who
attended the meeting.
My concerns about why or how these apartment buildings, which have been historically
identified as slum housing tenements for three decades could have been selected for moderate
rehab Section 8 are enhanced by the fact that the apartments in these units are extremely small and
would have seemed never to have been appropriate for young mothers with small and growing
children. Twelve of the mothers who met with me, for example, have three children as well as
themselves living in two small bedrooms. One of the mothers has three children and herself living
in a one bedroom, one mother has two children and herself living in a one bedroom. In many
cases the children were of different sexes and different ages and forced to live in the same
bedroom.
What I will attempt to do below is present a summary of the complaints of the tenants in
the buildings at 1320 N.W. 61st Street, 1370 N.W. 61st Street, 1501 N.W. 59th Street, 1230
N.W. 58th Terrace and 1321 N.W. 61st Street who attended the meeting at Drew Elementary.
(1) 1320 N.W. 61 st Street:
The tenant in Apt# 33 has resided there for four years. She resides with five children in a
two bedroom unit. She reports the kitchen wall is thoroughly mildewed, the kitchen floor saes.
the bathroom walls are mildewed, mice eat out of the baby's clothes and on one occasion she
caught eight mice in one day. She also reports spiders and the railing outside her doorway
appears shaking and insecure.
The Tenant in Apt.925, resides with her three children in a two bedroom and she reports
her kitchen leaks, the bathroom walls are mildewed and leaking, she has three unrepaired bullet
holes in her walls which were fired in from outside. She also complains of rats and mice and on
one occasion found baby mice that had been born in her shoes in a closet. The landing railing
outside her apartment also appears to be shaking and insecure.
The tenant in Apt. 937, reports water leaks in the bathroom, holes in the walls, rats
running in the walls and that the ceiling in her bathroom is sagging.
The tenant is Apt. 920, reports her kitchen floor is sagging, her air conditioning has not
worked since she moved in, her windows do not have functionin`; locks and are therefore not
secure and they do not have screens. She also reports ants, gnats and leaking bathroom faucets.
The tenant in Apt. 49, resides with her four children in tv,-o small bedrooms and she
98- 591
reports that because of some defect in her electricity she pays a $500 a month electric bill. She
also reports refrigerator problems, unlevel floors, window handles which don't function, maggots
that come into her first floor apartment because the garbage bins outside are not regularly
collected. She also reports a bullet hole fired in from outside into her children's room wall and
garbage stacked immediately outside her door, as well as a lack of screens for all windows and a
smoke detector that does not work -
The tenant in Apt. 412, lives with her three children in a one bedroom apartment «-here
she has resided since last October. She complains of rats and bathroom leaks, as well as of closet
doors that fall down. The rats she claims, permeate the entire building as do ants and other
insects.
The tenant in Apt. 96, lives with one child in a one bedroom apartment. She is a new
tenant who complains of sink leaks and an unrepaired broken window. The roof leaks into her
bedroom on her carpet and her bed when it rains. Her bathroom hot water leaks and as a result
she has a $275 water bill. The faucets under her bathroom and kitchen leak and her carpet is
claimed to be dirty and damp.
The tenant in Apt.. 910, complains of a refrigerator that has not worked for two weeks, a
leak in her hallway and a window facing the outside which does not lock. Recently a drug dealer
opened the window and threw in a gun which he was evidently attempting to hide from the police
who were pursuing him.
The tenant in Apt. 921, complains that all of her faucets leak and that her apartment is
infested with rats and roaches. She also complains that her walls are soft and mildewed and that
on one occasion a portion of the ceiling fell on her son's head. She also indicates that her carpet
is improperly fixed to the floor.
The tenant is Apt. 48, complains of a broken toilet which has not worked properly in a
month as well as a hole in the bathroom ceiling. She indicates that there is a crack in the bedroom
window and a defective refrigerator in her kitchen. The apartment is said to be infested with
roaches and she has bullet holes in her kitchen, her living room and the front door as well as in a
closet that were fired in from outside the apartment.
The tenant in Apt. 924, reports a sagging ceiling and a sink which is falling from the wall
as well as leaks in the bedroom. A portion of her closet is reported to have fallen on her one vlar
old child. Her refrigerator was broken and not repaired for a period of three months and her f ont
window has no frame. She also complains of an infestation of roaches and rats and a $680 wazer
bill due to leaks in the plumbing.
(2) 1370 N W 61st Street
The tenant in Apt. # 18, indicates that her bathroom sink le<,s are broken and that her
kitchen window has not had a working, lock for the past four months
98- 591
The tenant in Apt. 424, indicates that her kitchen floor is cracking and instead of repairing
the cracks that the workman merely placed linoleum on top of the cracks. She reports the
bathroom sink legs have fallen off and that water leaks into the apartment from upstairs and that
she receives electrical shocks from appliances, apparently attributable to the water leakage.
The tenant in Apt. # 17, reports leaks around her air conditioning and a bathroom floor
that is sinking in.
The tenant in Apt. 916, reports a leaking sink and a bathroom sink that is sagging. She
also reports an infestation of roaches.
The tenant in Apt. # 19, reports her windows do not work, her bedroom window has no
lock and no screen. She also reports a door that is peeling and an excessive water bill due to
leaking.
The tenant in Apt. 922, indicates and infestation of rats. She relates that a rat bit her baby
some months ago. Her toilet is said to run continually and the bedroom door is jammed,
presenting a fire hazard. The wiring of her ceiling light is apparently defective and the bathroom
faucets leak.
The tenant in Apt. #36, reports a $374 water bill apparently due to leaks and a $420 light
bill apparently due to electrical problems. She reports that her ceiling light fixture leaks water and
a broken bottom kitchen cabinet which leaks, causing the floor to rot. Her refrigerator is alleged
to have caught on fire and her bathroom tub faucet will not shut off. Her carpet has not been
cleaned and the children's bedroom door sticks. Insects fly around the apartment, the sink
backboard is loose, and the bedroom floor sags.
The tenant in Apt. 912, reports leakage in her bathroom and kitchen and a sink that is
falling out. She also reports holes in the walls throughout the apartment.
(3) 1321 N.W. 61 st Street
I must again emphasize that this third building of 36 apartments is located on the same
drug and crime infested block as the two preceding buildings and that with 36 units in each
apartment building and an average of two to three children in each unit that the number of
children growing upon this crime and violence ridden block is between 210 to 325. Idly purpose
in pursuing this inquiry is, of course, because it is impossible to successfully begin to address the
problem of juvenile crime if our public housing policy not only permits but also encoura;es infants
and young children to grow up in this kind of environment.
The tenant in apt. # 14, in this building, resides on the third floor and has no window
screens. The tiles on the bathroom walls have fallen off and the kitchen sink lens are broken. The
bathroom floor also has severe tile problems.
98- 591
The tenant in Apt. 96, resides with her three children in a two bedroom apartment and
complains of rat holes in her walls. This tenant and the next two tenants listed below complained
of sewage continually draining in the courtyard where the children must play for lack of any other
space to play in.
The tenant in Apt. #4, in fact is no longer a tenant and relates that she was forced to move
out when the building manager is alleged by her to have given the apartment to a personal friend
of his.
The tenant is Apt. #17, reports defective locks on her door, a bedroom window that has
no lock or screen, unclean carpets and a ceiling that is seriously cracked. Her kitchen sink leaks
and is coming off the wall. She also complains of an infestation of rats and roaches and a leaking
roof and of hearing rats running in the.walls. The floor sags in her son's room and the closet
doors have come off. Patches of water accumulate in her son's bedroom after it rains and the
floor is uneven. Her bathroom door does not shut properly and the bedroom door jams
improperly. This tenant has her own automobile and complains that tenants have no safe place to
park their cars and in fact she is forced to park her car on the street where on one occasion it was
shot through with several bullet holes.
The tenant in Apt. #4, is unique among the women who attended our meeting in that she
lives alone. She is an elderly woman who is ill with asthma and clearly requires a transfer due to
health reasons. Her bathroom door is broken as is her refrigerator which has leaked for two
years. Her sink is defective and she claims that her apartment is infested with roaches. She also
reports being badly troubled by having to listen to gun shots at nights. She apparently has been
denied a transfer.
(5) 1230 N.W. 58th Terrace
The tenant in Apt. #9, reports that her ceiling has been cracked and leaking for two years.
This tenant also reports that she once tried to move to Coral Gables but was denied an apartment
there which she claims was given to a Hispanic Section 8 tenant.
The tenant in Apt. # 13, who resides with her three children in a two bedroom apartment
reports a son who is asthmatic with a condition being worsened by clogged air ducts and that she
has a doctor's statement to this effect. No action has been taken to rectify this condition for over
six months.
The tenant in Apt. #1 1, resides with her three children in a two bedroom apartment and
the three children consist of a sirl 11, and boys 7 and 4 who are forced to live in the same room.
She also reports electrical problems and bad wiring and rain leaks as well as a leak in the kitchen
sink.
The tenant in Apt. #S, reports that water leaks down into her apartment from apartment
13 above her and that her closets are falling, off due to water damaue.
98- 591
The tenant in Apt. t#?, also reports leaks from the third floor to the first floor and leakage
throughout the apartment.
The tenant in Apt. 910, reports problems with her bathroom and states that she discovered
a bed of snakes behind her kitchen refrigerator. The apartment also is infested with roaches and
has a caved -in kitchen sink. Bullet holes are in her walls that were fired through the bedroom
window last year.
Subsequent to the meeting with the tenants I visited the apartment buildings at 13=0, 1370
and 1321 N.W. 61st Street and took a number of photographs of conditions pointed out to me by
the residents. I enclose a set -of those photographs. In taking photos of the depicted conditions I
attempted not to photograph any condition that had not preexisted for more than sixty days. In
each instance I was assured that the condition in the photographs had existed for a period longer
than two months and that at least one complaint had been registered with the ownerflandlord.
My meetings with the tenants in the five buildings and the photographs taken in the three
buildings would appear to raise certain questions which I would set forth as follows:
(1) What process could have permitted the choice of buildings on what was then and is
now a street that is regarded as one of the most crime ridden and drug infested streets in Dade
County since it was apparent that women raising small children would be the tenants in these
Section 8 moderate rehab buildings?
(2) How could the selection process have selected buildings which have such small
one and two bedroom apartments for a population of women and small children?
(3) Since all of the tenants in these five buildings appear to be African -American, are
there other Section 8 moderate rehab buildings that house a predominantly Hispanic population
and are these buildings in the same state of apparent disrepair as the buildings owned by Miami
Limited II?
(4) How could a competent inspection process have approved the continued use of
these buildings over the years with the conditions described and depicted in this letter existing
within them?
(5) How can rents which appear to range from $500 for a one bedroom apartment to
$650 for a two bedroom apartment be justified in a neighborhood where comparable rents appear
not to approach these rent market values?
98- 591
(6) Finally, since the women stated that they have never been informed of any choice
to opt for the voucher program or other public housing, is there no way that these women and
their children can be relocated to a safer and more habitable neiszhborhood.)
I know you share my concern regarding adequate public housing in Dade County and I
would anticipate that your review of the conditions in these buildings would confirm my
conclusion that something must be done to rectify this situation. When I suggested to the meeting
of women that perhaps their objectives should be to bring about suitable conditions in the
buildings, they unanimously stated that their goal was to leave those buildings and to seek housing
elsewhere since their primary. concerninvolved the impact of crime, drugs, and violence upon the
children they are attempting to raise under these intolerable conditions.
After you have had the opportunity to review this situation, I would welcome the
opportunity to meet with you or with the appropriate Section 8 administrators to discuss the
questions raised as well as to explore what remedies might be available to the women and families
involved.
Thank you so much for your continuing cooperation and I am anxious to work with you
to find a solution to this very troubling situation.
I look forward to seeing you soon.
Sincerely, r^
Thomas K. Petersen
Circuit Court Judge
Juvenile Division
TKP/aan
98- 591
Attachment B
KING HEIGHTS/ORCHARD VILLA COMMUNITIES
These communities are in the Model City NET Area and are located between NW 12th
and 17th Avenues, and NW 58th and 62"d (Martin Luther King, Jr. Boulevard) Streets.
Formerly known as Germ City, this area has a long history of being a problematic
neighborhood. These problems range from drug trafficking, prostitution, crime and
domestic violence to the basic quality of life issues and educational attainment. The most
problematic street in the area is the notorious NW 61St Street, from NW 131h to 15th
Avenues.
General Area Conditions:
• A mixture of single family, duplexes, and multi -family housing.
• Commercial uses and park/recreational uses are along the north edge of the
community.
• Most of the multi -family housing exists along the east, north and west blocks of the
area. With the exception of the area between NW 13th and 15th Avenues, and NW
58th and 59th Streets, which is zoned R-2 Duplex Residential, the balance of the area
is zoned R-2 Medium Density Residential. Although the zoning for this area is R-3,
most of the housing styles still reflect single family or duplex structures.
• There are more than 50 vacant properties throughout the project. Many of the vacant
properties along NW 61 st Street are contiguous, and could be assembled for medium
density planned unit development.
Multi -family Housing Living Conditions:
• Large concentrations of multi -family residents are along 61st Street.
• Living conditions in this area are depicted as deplorable.
• Residents of these multi -family structures pay subsidized rents between $600 and
$750 per month.
• Apartments range from one-bedroom/one bath to two-bedroom/one bath, between
400 to 700 square feet.
• There is no green space.
• There are no play areas for children.
• There are no secure/enclosed garbage containers.
• Many of the units have been boarded up.
• Heavy drug trafficking is evident in this area.
98- 591
1370 N.W. 61 Street
1320 N.W. 61 Street
1321 N.W. 61 Street
1270 N.W. 60 Street
1501 N.W. 59 Street
Total Development
Rehabilitation Information
/mb
Attachment C
Miami Limited II Project
36 apartments
48 apartments
20 apartments
18 apartments
18 apartments
140 apartments
102 - 1 bedroom apartments
38 - 2 bedroom apartments
Owner: Miami Limited II
a Florida Limited Partnership
Aristides Martinez, President
Rehabilitation Loan: $1,935,000 CDBG funds
3% interest
15 year term
In 1995, owner requested and received a moratorium on
repayment of City's loan until April 4, 2002 - when a balloon
payment for the outstanding principal balance plus interest
will be due.
Private Financing: $3,400,000 from a private lending institution.
Rental Subsidy Received: Total HAP (Housing Assistance Payments) received by the
(9/88 - 5/98) owner - approximately $6,338,641.
<Shared/Housing-Mi amiLim itedlIProject>
98- 591
Section 8 Moderate Rehabilitation
Statistics by Building
Address Total amount of Kids per unit
1320 NW 61 Street 68
1370 NW 61 Street 43
1501 NW 59 Street 16
1270 NW 60 Street 31
1321 NW 61 Street 33
191
98- 591
Page 1
Microsoft Excell
OCCUPANCY STATISTICS BY BUILDING
MIAMI LIMITED II
'Building
Unit
Size
HOH
DOB
Age
M/F
1320 NW 61 St
1
2/1
Gilbert, Bernadette
1 l7172
26
F
1
6/3/98
3
F
1
12/28/96
1
F
1
4/10/90
8
M
1320 NW 61 St
2
1/1
Livingston, Chris
12/19/78
18
F
2
6/27/95
2
F
1320 NW 61 St
3
1/1
Dixon, Latricia
5/13/76
22
F
3
Se 97
1 7 mo
M
1320 NW 61 St
4
1/1
Rolle, Ato a
5/3/84
21
F
4
11 /15/93
4
F
1320 NW 61 St
5
1/1
Galloway, Cheryl
5/3/69
29
F
5
4/9/92
6
M
8/29/96
1
M
1320 NW 61 St
6
1/1
Jacobs, Tamilko
9/19/75
22
F
6
10/17/96
1
F
1320 NW 61 St
7
1/1
Walker, Latravia
123/75
23
F
7
11 /9/93
4
F
7
326/97
1
M
1320 NW 61 St
8
1/1
Bingham, Demonica
2/6l76
22
F
8
4/19/93
5
F
8
2
M
8
1
F
1320 NW 61 St
9
2/1
Snell, Reashawda
121171
27
F
9
224/91
7
M
9
11 /17/92
1 5
M
9
7/7/94
3
F
9
7/7/94
3
F
1320 NW 61 St
10
1/1
Hepburn, Andrea
5/9172
26
F
10
724/91
6
F
10
7 months
M
6/8/98
Page 2
Microsoft Excell
OCCUPANCY STATISTICS BY BUILDING
MIAMI LIMITED II
1320 NW 61 St
11
1/1
Johnson, Son a
1/30/74
24
F
11
524/91
7
M
1320 NW 61 St
12
1/1
Naylor, Deninah
9/14/77
20
F
12
526/96
2
F
1320 NW 61 St
13
1/1
Moore, Cassandra
624/78
19
F
13
8/12/96
1
M
1320 NW 61 St
14
1/1
King, Tan ie
23
F
14
7
F
1320 NW 61 St
15
2/1
Vacant
1320 NW 61 St
16
2/1
Jones, Venus
1/12/69
29
F
16
1227/87
10
F
16
1027/93
4
M
16
1027/93
4
M
1320 NW 61 St
17
2/1
White, Toscha
5/9l72
26
F
17
5/4/89
9
M
1320 NW 61 St
18
1/1
Williams, Zadra
112177
20
F
18
8/15/93
4
F
1320 NW 61 St
19
1/1
Torrence, Teguia
2/4l79
19
F
19
324/95
3
M
1320 NW 61 St
20
1/1
Jones, Katrice
5/31l79
19
F
20
5/15/93
5
M
1320 NW 61 St
21
1/1
Askew, Christina
223f75
23
F
21
224/92
6
M
1320 NW 61 St
22
1/1
Vacant
6/8/98
Page 3
Microsoft Excell
OCCUPANCY STATISTICS BY BUILDING
MIAMI LIMITED II
1320 NW 61 St
23
1/1
Branch, Nancy
10/24/76
21
F
23
5/4/94
4
M
1320 NW 61 St
24
1/1
James, Teresa
920175
22
F
24
723/93
4
F
24
1025/96
1
F
1320 NW 61 St
25
2/1
Williams, Natalie
9/13/68
29
F
25
6/14/90
7
F
25
224/92
6
F
25
11/4/97
8 months
M
1320 NW 61 St
26
1/1
Thomas, Tina
6/1l70
27
F
26
4/15/94
4
M
1320 NW 61 St
27
1/1
Hurt, Bobbie
8/6/73
1 24
F
27
4/17/92
6
F
1320 NW 61 St
28
1/1
Mo d, Mary
7/1l74
23
F
28
429/91
7
M
1320 NW 61 St
29
Vacant
1320 NW 61 St
30
1/1
Greene, Margaret
620/44
53
F
30
9/19/88
9
M
1320 NW 61 St
31
2/1
Burnett, Lashan
2/10l75
23
F
31
2/12/89
9
F
31
3/16/95
3
F
1320 NW 61 St
32
2/1
Armstrong, Chantilly
1/10/74
24
F
32
423/91
7
F
32
1224/96
1
M
1320 NW 61 St
33
2/1
Wesley, Pamela
1/3l72
26
F
33
928/96
1
M
33
8/17/94
3
M
33
3/18/93
5
F
33
11 /5/91
6
F
33
1/31/90
8
F
6/8/98
Page 4
Microsoft Excell
OCCUPANCY STATISTICS BY BUILDING
MIAMI LIMITED II
1320 NW 61 St
34
1/1
Vacant
1320 NW 61 St
35
1/1
Owens, Kizz
10/5178
19
F
35
4/11 /97
1
M
1320 NW 61 St
36
1/1
Vacant
1320 NW 61 St
37
1/1
Shaw, Monique
7/8170
27
F
37
10/10/90
7
M
1320 NW 61 St
38
1/1
Vacant
1320 NW 61 St
39
1/1
Sands, Antoinette
4/15177
22
F
39
5/12/96
2
F
1320 NW 61 St
40
1/1
Holley, Lisa
7/17l72
25
F
40
525/90
7
M
40
M
40
M
1320 NW 61 St
41
1/1
Nanton, Sabrina
128/62
36
F
41
125/83
15
M
41
3/3/88
10
M
1320 NW 61 St
42
1/1
Pelote, Katrina
7/26l73
24
F
42
8/4/92
5
F
42
627/95
1
F
1320 NW 61 St
43
1/1
Washington, Valteria
9/15l72
25
F
43
926/96
1
M
1320 NW 61 St
44
1/1
Brown, Katrina
4/6175
23
F
44
11 /15/95
2
M
1320 NW 61 St
45
1/1
Vacant
6/8/98
fTJ
0
Page 6
Microsoft Excell
OCCUPANCY STATISTICS BY BUILDING
MIAMI LIMITED II
11
12/19/97
5 month
M
1370 NW 61 St
12
2/1
Wells, Latan a
8/13/67
30
F
12
425/86
12
F
12
6/10/95
2
M
1370 NW 61 St
13
2/1
Vacant
1370 NW 61 St
14
1/1
Pettihome, Kim
417/77
21
F
14
1125/97
6 months
F
1370 NW 61 St
15
1/1
Ravelo, Miriela
1228l74
23
F
15
9/19/97
8 months
F
1370 NW 61 St
16
1/1
McRae, Vertia
12/30l75
22
F
16
524/92
6
F
16
6/3/95
2
M
1370 NW 61 St
17
1/1
Hair, Cotina
11/25/72
25
F
17
4/13/92
6
F
17
4/18/96
2
M
1370 NW 61 St
18
1/1
Wells, Lake sha
9/9/78
1 19
F
18
1/1
6/13/95
2
M
1370 NW 61 St
19
1/1
Williams, Latron a
124f79
19
F
19
1220/96
1
F
1370 NW 61 St
20
1/1
Stephens, Am
8/2/73
24
F
20
8/9/94
3
F
1370 NW 61 St
21
1/1
Stitt, Lynette
9/15/70
27
F
21
7/1/91
6
F
21
11/12/97
6 Months
F
1370 NW 61 St
22
1/1
Jackson, Cassandra
9/19/72
25
F
22
10/12/91
6
F
22
42/97
1
F
1370 NW 61 St
23
1/1
Browder, Natssha
I
629178
19
F
23J
4/4/95
3
M
6/8/98
Page 7
Microsoft Excell
OCCUPANCY STATISTICS BY BUILDING
MIAMI LIMITED II
1370 NW 61 St
24
2/1
Fredrick, Lashonne
9/12/68
29
F
24
10/9/87
10
F
24
1!7/89
8
F
24
5/27/92
6
M
1370 NW 61 St
25
2/1
Rudisel, Sherri
7/26170
27
F
25
9/18/87
10
M
25
1025/91
6
F
25
6/16/93
4
F
25
14
F
1370 NW 61 St
26
1/1
Haywood, Lisa
423/78
20
F
26
10/12/94
3
M
26
6/18/97
1
M
1370 NW 61 St
27
1/1
Vacant
1370 NW 61 St
28
1/1
Crum ton, Teguita
9/3178
19
F
28
10/19/95
2
F
1370 NW 61 St
29
1/1
Tar le , John
3/10/78
20
M
1370 NW 61 St
30
1/1
Ables, Ma
3/18/75
23
F
30
4
M
30
629/94
3
M
30
1/15/97
1
M
1370 NW 61 St
31
1/1
Proctor, Lashawn
1122/78
19
F
31
3/31 /95
3
M
1370 NW 61 St
32
1/1
Sharp, Adrienne
1020/79
18
F
32
11 /8/94
3
M
1370 NW 61 St
33
1/1
Guyton, W nell
121/56
42
F
1370 NW 61 St
34
1/1 jJenkins,
Valencia
920172
25
F
34
929/94
3
M
6/8/98
Page 12
Microsoft Excell
OCCUPANCY STATISTICS BY BUILDING
MIAMI LIMITED II
11
2/10/88
10
F
11
1023/89
8
F
11
623/95
3
F
1321 NW 61 St
12
1/1
Brown, Cleopatra
3/28l78
20
F
12
821 /94
3
F
1321 NW 61 St
13
2/1
Hines-Hatten, Gail
9/9/62
35
F
13
9/3/90
7
M
13
2/19/96
2
M
1321 NW 61 St
14
22
Simmons, Paula
4/2f71
27
F
14
526/91
7
F
14
420/94
4
M
14
4/6/95
3
F
1321 NW 61 St
15
1/1
Davis, Latavia
9/9f75
22
F
15
826/93
4
F
1321 NW 61 St
16
1/1
Jones, Cowanda
9/17f75
22
F
16
9/12/93
4
F
16
102/96
1
F
1321 NW 61 St
17
1/1
Meyers, Latosha
5/5f75
23
F
17
5/13/94
4
M
1321 NW 61 St
18
2/1
Williford, Catina
11/11/72
25
F
18
6/15/92
6
F
18
723/94
3
F
18
1/1/95
3
F
1321 NW 61 St
19
1/1
Jones, Edvena
12/5/65
32
F
19
5/9/92
6
F
19
322/96
2
F
19
222/97
1
F
1321 NW 61 St
20
1/1
Jones, Tywanna
10/16/71
26
F
9/16/90
8
M
7/15/91
6
M
2/4/94
4
F
6/8/98
KING HEIGHTS/ORCHARD VILLA
COMMUNITY RECLAMATION PROJECT
The King Heights area is located within the Model City NET Area.
The Model City NET Area is currently staffed with 43 Police
Officers, 5 Police Sergeants, 1 Police Lieutenant.
These officers are assigned primarily to the Model City Area
with 4 officers dedicated primarily to the 1370 NW 61 Street
area.
The officers working the King Heights/Orchard Villa Area
enforce the laws in order to abate the criminal activity
that occurs.
From January 1, 1998 to May 31, 1998, 435 arrests have been
made by officers assigned to the King Heights Area.
From January 1, 1998 to May 31, 1998, officers assigned to
Model City have responded to the location 1320 NW 61 Street,
124 times.
From January 1, 1998 to May 31, 1998, the North District
POPS/CSD have made 58 narcotics arrest at 1320 NW 61 Street.
The King Heights Area along with the Liberty Square Housing
Project and the NW 15 Avenue Business District was
experiencing a vast amount of gun violence, open drug sales,
illegal gambling, loitering, and drinkingin public from
people who did not live in the area. This type of
lawlessness was contributing to the continued decline in the
quality of life for the residents of King Heights and the
surrounding. area. To abate this problem, the Zero Tolerance
Strategy was implemented to address these concerns.
The Zero Tolerance Strategy consists of 12 uniformed
officers, 1 sergeant, 1 lieutenant on an overtime basis
assigned to a target area to address all criminal offenses
committed within the target area. This initiative was
implemented March 6, 1998 and has been successful in the
continuing decline in crime the Model City Area is
experiencing.
98- 591
2
From March 6, 1998 to May 31, 1998, the Zero Tolerance
Operation has 376 felony arrests and 526 misdemeanor arrests
in the target area. This operation has dramatically reduced
the violent crimes and robberies that occur in the King
Heights Area.
There have been no reported shootings or homicides in the
area for a three month period (March, April, May, 1998).
The staffing strategy for the King Heights Area would entail
creating permanent two man beats for the target area. These
officers would be assigned to the area 7 days a week. The
assignment would entail that the officer proactively patrol
the area address all problems, find lasting rather than
band -aid solutions to problems. They will not be dispatched
from the target area. There will be a cost associated with
permanent staffing.
The Model City, King Heights area has been identified as one
of the distressed neighborhoods that will receive additional
police officers under the recently awarded federal grant.
These additional resources will assist the department in our
continued efforts to make the King Heights/Orchard Villa
Area crime free.
98- 591
RING HEIGHTS/ORCHARD VILLA
COMMUNITY RECLAMATION PROJECT
The Ring Heights area is located within the Model City NET Area.
The Model City NET Area is currently staffed with 43 Police
Officers, 5 Police Sergeants, 1 Police Lieutenant.
These officers are assigned primarily to the Model City Area
with 4 officers dedicated primarily to the 1370 NW 61 Street
area.
The officers working the King Heights/Orchard Villa Area
enforce the laws in order to abate the criminal activity
that occurs.
From January 1, 1998 to May 31, 1998, 435 arrests have been
made by officers assigned to the King Heights Area.
From January 1, 1998 to May 31, 1998, officers assigned to
Model City have responded to the location 1320 NW 61 Street,
124 times.
From January 1, 1998 to May 31, 1998, the North District
POPS/CSD have made 58 narcotics arrest at 1320 NW 61 Street.
The King Heights Area along with the Liberty Square Housing
Project and the NW 15 Avenue Business District was
experiencing a vast amount of gun violence, open drug sales,
illegal gambling, loitering., and drinking in public from
people who did not live in the area. This type of
lawlessness was contributing to the continued decline in the
quality of life for the residents of King Heights and the
surrounding area. To abate this problem, the Zero Tolerance
Strategy was implemented to address these concerns.
The Zero Tolerance Strategy consists of 12 uniformed
officers, 1 sergeant, 1 lieutenant on an overtime basis
assigned to a target area to address all criminal offenses
committed within the target area. This initiative was
implemented March 6, 1998 and has been successful in the
continuing decline in crime the Model City Area is
experiencing.
98- 591
From March 60, 1998 to May 31, 1998,
Operation has 376 felony arrests and 526
in the target area. This operation has
the violent crimes and robberies that
Heights Area.
2
the Zero Tolerance
misdemeanor arrests
dramatically reduced
occur in the King
There have been no reported shootings or homicides in the
area for a three month period (March, April, May, 1998).
The staffing strategy for the King Heights Area would entail
creating permanent two man beats for the target area. These
officers would be assigned to the area 7 days a week. The
assignment would entail that the officer proactively patrol
the area address all problems, find lasting rather than
band -aid solutions to problems. They will not be dispatched
from the target area. There will be a cost associated with
permanent staffing.
The Model City, King Heights area has been identified as one
of the distressed neighborhoods that will receive additional
police officers under the recently awarded federal grant.
These additional resources will assist the department in our
continued efforts to make the King Heights/Orchard Villa
Area crime free.
98- 591
RING HEIGHTS/ORCHARD VILLA
COMMUNITY RECLAMATION PROJECT
The King Heights area is located within the Model City NET Area.
The Model City NET Area is currently staffed with 43 Police
Officers, 5 Police Sergeants, 1 Police Lieutenant.
These officers are assigned primarily to the Model City Area
with 4 officers dedicated primarily to the 1370 NW 61 Street
area.
The officers working the King Heights/Orchard Villa Area
enforce the laws in order to abate the criminal activity
that occurs.
From January 1, 1998 to May 31, 1998, 435 arrests have been
made by officers assigned to the King Heights Area.
From January 1, 1998 to May 31, 1998, officers assigned to
Model City have responded to the location 1320 NW 61 Street,
124 times.
From January 1, 1998 to May 31, 1998, the North District
POPS/CSD have made 58 narcotics arrest at 1320 NW 61 Street.
The King Heights Area along with the Liberty Square Housing
Project and the NW 15 Avenue Business District was
experiencing a vast amount of gun violence, open drug sales,
illegal gambling, loitering, and drinking in public from
people who did not live in the area. This type of
lawlessness was contributing to the continued decline in the
quality of life for the residents of King Heights and the
surrounding area. To abate this problem, the Zero Tolerance
Strategy was implemented to address these concerns.
The Zero Tolerance Strategy consists of 12 uniformed
officers, 1 sergeant, 1 lieutenant on an overtime basis
assigned to a target area to address all criminal offenses
committed within the target area. This initiative was
implemented March 6, 1998. and has been successful in the
continuing decline in crime the Model City Area is
experiencing.
98- 591
From March 6, 1998 to May 31, 1998,
Operation has 376 felony arrests and 526
in the target area. This operation has
the violent crimes and robberies that
Heights Area.
✓q
the Zero Tolerance
misdemeanor arrests
dramatically reduced
occur in the King
There have been no reported shootings or homicides in the
area for a three month period (March, April, May, 1998).
The staffing strategy for the King Heights Area would entail
creating permanent two man beats for the target area. These
officers would be assigned to the area 7 days a week. The
assignment would entail that the officer proactively patrol
the area address all problems, find lasting rather than
band -aid solutions to problems. They will not be dispatched
from the target area. There will be a cost associated with
permanent staffing.
The Model City, Ring Heights area has been identified as one
of the distressed neighborhoods that will receive additional
police officers under the recently awarded federal grant.
These additional resources will assist the department in our
continued efforts to make the King Heights/Orchard Villa
Area crime free.
98- 591
Page 8
Microsoft Excell
OCCUPANCY STATISTICS BY BUILDING
MIAMI LIMITED II
1370 NW 61 St
35
1/1
Foster, Adrianne
2/21f77
21
F
35
1 /17/97
1
M
1370 NW 61 St
36
2/1
Fordham, Latosha
12/16/74
23
F
36
6/16/93
4
F
36
2/4/95
3
F
36
9/8/96
1
F
Building
Unit
Size
HOH
DOB
Age
M/F
1501 NW 59 St
1
1/1
Moore, Winifred
120f73
25 1
F
1
7/4/92
5
M
1501 NW 59 St
2
2/1
Fredrick, C nteria
826/67
30
F
2
1 /9189
9
M
2 1
3/30/97
1
F
1501 NW 59 St
3
1/1
Garner, Rub
722/42
55
F
1501 NW 59 St
4
1/1
Robinson, Louise
2/19/38
60
F
1501 NW 59 St
5
2/1
Williams, Angela
3/17/67
31
F
5
826/89
1 8
M
7/19/92
5
F
1501 NW 59 St
6
2/1
Taylor, Pearline
11/1/32
65
F
6
9/3f78
19
F
11/12/81
16
F
1501 NW 59 St
7
1/1
Mosley, Carrie
9/17/63
34
F
7
6/3/87
10
F
1501 NW 59 St
8
1/1
Miller, Shantaria
2/4179
19
F
8
329/97
1
M
1501 NW 59 St
9
1/1
Williams, Marilyn
6/11f74
23
F
9
826/89
8
F
1501 NW 59 St
10
Nelson, Rosa
3/14/56
42
F
10
2/7/91
7
M
6/8/98
RR
Page 9
Microsoft Excell
OCCUPANCY STATISTICS BY BUILDING
MIAMI LIMITED II
1501 NW 59 St
11
2/1
Peterson, Dell
11/3/61
36
F
11
9/16/81
16
F
11
10/19/76
22
F
1501 NW 59 St
12
2/1
Biilue, Elease
516/30
58
F
12
517/76 1
22
F
1501 NW 59 St
13
1/1
Jupiter, Betty
10/7/46
51
F
1/1/85
13
F
1501 NW 59 St
14
1/1
Hill, Sophia
10/16/78
19
F
14
2/23/96
2
F
1501 NW 59 St
15
1/1
Lawson, Jerry
1 /31 /46
52
M
1501 NW 59 St
16
1/1
Peterson, Rebecca
62525
73 1
F
1501 NW 59 St
17
2/1
Vacant
1501 NW 59 St
18
2/1
Way, Lawanda
122/61
37
F
18
10/14/91
7
F
18
521 /88
10
F
18
3/18/94
4
M
Building
Unit
Size
HOH
DOB
Age
MIF
1270 NW 60 St
1
2/1
Smith, Dorth
10/6/62
35
F
1
1 /7/87
1 11
M
1
11/15/92
5
M
1270 NW 60 St
2
2/1
Linder, Charlette
1125/67
30
F
2
228/97
1
F
2
125/90
8
F
2
11 /3/91
7
M
1270 NW 60 St
3
1/1
Long, Deloris
1220/70
27
F
3
829/88
9
M
3
4 month
F
1270 NW 60 St
4
1/1
Brown, Dorcia
9/17l70
27
F
4
724/90
1 7
F
4
426/95
3
M
1270 NW 60 St
5
1 1/1
Covington, Sheria
2/17l77
21
F
6/8/98
an
Page 10
Microsoft Excell
OCCUPANCY STATISTICS BY BUILDING
MIAMI LIMITED II
5
4/18/97
1
M
1270 NW 60 St
6
1/1
Branch, Brand
1224178
19
F
1270 NW 60 St
7
2/1
Brown, Deborah
12/14/58
39
F
7
827178
19
M
7
9/10179
18
M
7
9/10l79
18
M
7
9/16/80
17
F
1270 NW 60 St
8
2/1
Simmons, Elvira
721/49
48
F
1270 NW 60 St
9
1/1
Gittin s Tonia
926170
27
F
9
10/3/95
2
M
9
10/1/96
1
F
1270 NW 60 St
10
1/1
Vacant
1270 NW 60 St
11
1/1
James, Joy
10/12/68
29
F
11
9/4/93
4
M
11
6/8/94
4
M
11
6/8/94
4
M
11
6/7/87
11
F
1270 NW 60 St
12
1/1
Parker, Latocia
226/69
26
F
12
326/91
7
F
12
62/95
3
M
1270 NW 60 St
13
2/1
Jackson, Sher
826/63
34
F
13
10/9/87
10
M
13
11/19/81
16
M
13
1 /3/84
13
F
1270 NW 60 St
14
1/1
Varnedoe, Carrie
3/6/67
31
F
14
11/8/91
6
F
14
6/7/89
9
F
1270 NW 60 St
15
1/1
Everett Sharna
12l7/69
28
F
15
1025/87
10
M
1270 NW 60 St
16
1/1
1 Drayton, Christine
1
1/18/72
27
F
16
1
1
1
9/17/94
3
M
6/8/98
Page 11
Microsoft Excell
OCCUPANCY STATISTICS BY BUILDING
MIAMI LIMITED II
16
6/18/96
1
M
16
8/1/97
10 months
F
1270 NW 60 St
17
1/1
Hammett, Tammy
11/19/74
23
F
17
9/10/92
5
M
17
10/13/96
1
M
1270 NW 60 St
18
1/1
Vacant
Building
Unit
Size
HOH
DOB
Age
M/F
1321 NW 60 St
1
V
1321 NW 61 St
2
1/1
Bell, Annie
10/626
71
F
1321 NW 61 St
3
1/1
Garmon, Archie
122427
70
M
1321 NW 61 St
4
1/1
Williams, Phyllis
1122/60
37
F
4
V7/94
4
F
1321 NW 61 St
5
2/1
Council, Bri itt
8/20/71
27
F
5
129/91
7
F
5
6/11/94
4
M
1321 NW 61 St
6
1/1
Barnes, Ton a
12/6/72
25
F
6
628/91
7
M
6
1224/94
3
F
6
926/96
2
F
1321 NW 61 St
7
2/1
Hadley, Princilla
11/15/69
28
F
7
3/6/89
9
M
7
924/90
8
M
7
11 /17/93
4
F
1321 NW 61 St
8
1/1
Patterson Ethlen
2/6/39
59
F
1321 NW 61 St
9
1/1
Cooper, Rub
8/1/18
80
F
1321 NW 61 St
10
1/1
Newsome, Sharon
9/16/69
28
F
10
826/90
7
M
10
129/95
3
F
1321 NW 61 St
11
1 2/1
Boston, Laton a
92/68
30
1 F
6/8/98
R00