HomeMy WebLinkAboutR-99-0961J-99-477RS2
12/14/99
RESOLUTION NO. 9 9 9 61
A RESOLUTION OF THE MIAMI CITY COMMISSION, WITH
ATTACHMENT(S), APPROVING WITH CONDITIONS, A
MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT DEVELOPMENT ORDER
PURSUANT TO ARTICLES 5, 13 AND 17 OF ZONING
ORDINANCE NO. 11000, FOR THE BRICKELL BAY
VILLAGE PROJECT, TO BE LOCATED AT
APPROXIMATELY 2101-2105 BRICKELL AVENUE, MIAMI,
FLORIDA, TO BE COMPRISED OF NOT MORE THAN 359
UNITS, WITH ACCESSORY RECREATIONAL SPACE AND
510 PARKING SPACES; DIRECTING TRANSMITTAL OF
THE HEREIN RESOLUTION; MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT
AND STATING CONCLUSIONS OF LAW; PROVIDING FOR
BINDING EFFECT; CONTAINING A SEVERABILITY
CLAUSE AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, on March 5, 1999, Coral Way Investments, Inc., ("APPLICANT"),
submitted a complete Application for Major Use Special Permit for the Brickell Bay Village
Project ("PROJECT") pursuant to Articles 5, 9, 13 and 17 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, the
Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended ("Zoning Ordinance No. 11000") ,
for the property located at approximately 2101-2105 Brickell Avenue, Miami, Florida, as legally
described on Exhibit "B", attached d hereto and in Exhibit "A", the Development Order attached
hereto; and
WHEREAS, development of the PROJECT requires the issuance of a Major Use Special
Permit Development Order pursuant to Article 17 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000; and
WHEREAS, the Large Scale Development Committee met on November 12, 1998, to
consider the proposed PROJECT and offer its input; and
�"$aCill 11.ldaEIEli (� U
�
l LL4L�
f
CITY COMMSSION
NEETINC OF
DEC 1 k 1999
Resolution No.
99 - 961
WHEREAS, the APPLICANT has modified the proposed PROJECT to address the
expressed technical concerns raised at said Large Scale Development Committee meeting; and
WHEREAS, the Urban Development Review Board met on December 7, 1998, to
consider the proposed PROJECT and recommended approval of the PROJECT subject to
complying with staff requirements concerning the landscape plan as it pertained to preservation
of trees along Brickell Avenue and other perimeter landscape issues; and
WHEREAS, the Miami Planning Advisory Board, at its meeting held on May 19, 1999,
Item No. 1, following an advertised public hearing, adopted Resolution No. PAB 21-99 by a vote
of seven to one (7-1), RECOMMENDING DENIAL of the Major Use Special Permit
Development Order as attached hereto; and
WHEREAS, on November 18, 1999, the applicant Coral Way Investments, Inc.,
submitted a modification to said MUSP application; and
WHEREAS, on December 3, 1999, the Zoning Administrator determined that said
modification was substantial pursuant to Section 2215 of Zoning Ordinance 11000, as amended;
and
WHEREAS, on December 6, 1999, the Director of Planning and Zoning, pursuant to the
determination by the Zoning Administrator, determined the proposed modification to the
Planning Advisory Board for review and consideration pursuant to Sections 2215.4 and 1706 of
Zoning Ordinance 11000, as amended; and
WHEREAS, the Miami Planning Advisory Board, at its meeting held on December 13,
1999, Item No. 1, following and advertised public meeting, adopted Resolution No. PAB 60-99
by a vote of seven to zero (7-0), RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of the PROPOSED
MODIFICATION to the Major Use Special Permit Development Order as attached hereto; and
WHEREAS, the City Commission, deems it advisable and in the best interest of the
general welfare of the City of Miami to issue a Major Use Special Permit Development Order as
hereinafter set forth;
Page 2of6 0�.)"�-d
H
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
M
IAMI, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The recitals and findings contained in the Preamble to this Resolution are
hereby adopted by reference thereto and incorporated herein as if fully set forth in this Section.
Section 2. A Major Use Special Permit Development Order, attached hereto as
Exhibit "A" and made a part hereof, is hereby approved subject to the conditions specified in
said Development order, per Article 17 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, the Zoning Ordinance
of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended ("Zoning Ordinance No. 11000"), for the Brickell Bay
Village Project ("PROJECT") to be developed by Coral Way Investments, Inc.
("APPLICANT"), at approximately 2101-2105 Brickell Avenue, Miami, Florida, more
particularly described on Exhibit "B", attached hereto and made a part hereof.
Section 3. The PROJECT is hereby approved for the construction of up to 359
residential units, with accessory recreational uses and 510 parking spaces.
Section 4. The Major Use Special Permit Application for the PROJECT also
encompassesthe lower ranking Special Permits as set forth in the Development Order, attached
as Exhibit A' hereto and incorporated herein.
Section 5. The findings of fact set forth below are hereby made with respect to the
subject PROJECT:
a• The PROJECT is in conformity with the adopted Miami Comprehensive
Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000, as amended.
b• The PROJECT is in accord with the R-4 Zoning classifications of Zoning
Ordinance No. 11000.
C. Pursuant to Section 1305 of the Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, the specific site
plan aspects of the PROJECT, i.e. , ingress and egress, parking, signs and
lighting, utilities, drainage, preservation of natural features and control of
potentially adverse effects generally, have been considered and will be further
Page 3 of 6 0 i�
C.
considered administratively during the process of issuing a building permit and a
certificate of occupancy.
The PROJECT is expected to cost approximately $88 million, and to employ
approximately 224 workers during construction (full time employees); the
PROJECT will also result in the creation of approximately 10 permanent new
jobs. The PROJECT will generate approximately $5.4 million annually in tax
revenues to local units of government (of which approximately $696,364 will go
to the City of Miami) (1999 dollars).
The City Cominission further finds that:
(1) the PROJECT will have a favorable impact on the economy of the City of
Miami;
(2) the PROJECT will efficiently use public transportation
facilities;
(3) any potentially adverse effects of the PROJECT will be mitigated through
compliance with the conditions of this Major Use Special Permit;
(4) the PROJECT will favorably affect the need for people to find adequate
housing reasonably accessible to their places of employment;
(5) the PROJECT will efficiently use necessary public facilities;
(6) the PROJECT will not negatively impact the environment and natural
resources of the City;
(7) the PROJECT will not adversely affect living conditions in the
neighborhood;
(8) the PROJECT will not adversely affect public safety;
(9) based on the record presented and evidence presented, the public welfare
will be served by the PROJECT; and
(10) any potentially adverse effects of the PROJECT arising from safety and
security, fire protection and life safety, solid waste, heritage conservation,
Page 4 of 6
0
trees, shoreline development, minority participation and employment, and
minority contractor/subcontractor participation will be mitigated through
compliance with the conditions of this Major Use Special Permit.
Section 6. The Major Use Special Permit, as approved and amended, shall be binding
upon the APPLICANT and any successors in interest.
Section 7. The application for Major Use Special Permit, which was submitted on
March 5, 1999, (as amended on November 18, 1999) and on file with the Department of
Planning of the City of Miami, Florida, shall be relied upon generally for administrative
interpretations and is made a part hereof by reference.
Section 8. This Major Use Special Permit will expire two (2) years from its effective
date which is thirty (30) days after the adoption of the herein Resolution.
Section 9. The City Manager is hereby directed to instruct the Director of the
Department of Planning to transmit a copy of this Resolution and attachment to the developers:
Osvaldo R. Orozco, Esquire, on behalf of Coral Way Investment, Inc., 2500 First Union
Financial Center, 200 South Biscayne Boulevard, Miami, Florida 33131-2336.
Section 10. The Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law are made with respect to the
PROJECT as described in the Development Order for the Brickell Bay Village Project, which is
attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and made a part hereof by reference, as more particularly
described in Exhibit "A".
Section 11. The Major Use Special Permit Development Order for the Brickell Bay
Village Project (Exhibit "A") is hereby granted and issued.
Section 12. In the event that any portion or section of this Resolution or the
Development order (Exhibit "A") is determined to be invalid, illegal, or unconstitutional by a
court or agency of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall in no manner affect the remaining
portions of this Resolution or Development Order (Exhibit "A") which shall remain in full force
and effect.
Page 5of6 0�_, a
(3) 0
Section 13. This Resolution shall become effective thirty (30) days after its adoption.1/
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 14'' day of _December , 1999.
ATTEST:
WALTER J. FOEMAN
CITY CLERK
AS
JOE CAROLLO, MAYOR
In accordance with Miami Code Sec. 2-36,
since the indicate
approval of this legislation by signing it in
the designated place provided, said
legislation now becomes effective with the
elapse of ten (10) days from the date of
Commission action regarding same, without
the Mayor exercising a veto.
St-
t`IT�ATTORNEY
to accordance with Miami Code Sec. 2-3G, sirce the t/aycr did not indicate approval of
this legislation by signing it in the designated place provided, said legislation now
W3491RS2 becomes effective with the elapse of ten (10) dayG rrr the date issian ron
vegarding same, without the Mayor exer6 a /afo.
If the Mayor does not sign this Resolution, it shall become effective at the end of
ten calendar days from the date it was passed and adopted. If the Mayor vetoes
this Resolution, it shall become effective immediately upon override of the veto
by the City Commission.
Page bof6
EXHIBIT "A"
ATTACHMENT TO
RESOLUTION NO,
DATE:
BRICKELL BAY VILLAGE PROJECT
MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT
DEVELOPMENT ORDER
Let it be known that pursuant to Articles 5, 9, 13 and 17 of Ordinance No. 11000, the
Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended ("Zoning Ordinance No. 11000"),
the Commission of the City of Miami, Florida, has considered in a public hearing, the issuance
of a Major Use Special Permit for the Brickell Bay Village Project ("PROJECT") to be located at
approximately 2101-2105 Brickell Avenue, Miami, Florida; see legal description on Exhibit "B",
attached hereto and made a part hereof; said legal description being subject to any dedications,
limitations, restrictions, reservations or easements of record.
After due consideration of the recommendations of the Planning Advisory Board and
after due consideration of the consistency of this proposed development with the Miami
Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan, the City Commission has approved the PROJECT, and
subject to the following conditions approves the Major Use Special Permit and hereby issues this
Permit:
FINDINGS OF FACT
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
The proposed Bay Village Project is a residential development to be located at
approximately 2101-2105 Brickell Avenue, Miami, Florida. The PROJECT is located on a gross
lot area of approximately 4.668 acres and a net lot area of approximately 3.2713 acres of land
Page 1 of 7 ��
101
0
(more specifically described on Exhibit "B", incorporated herein by reference). The remainder of
the PROJECT's VITAL DATA is attached hereto as EXHIBIT "C", and incorporated herein by
reference.
The proposed PROJECT will consist of not more than 359 residential units in a single 26
story tower over a parking structure consisting of two levels below ground parking and two
levels above ground with accessory recreational space and a lobby consisting of the following
accessory uses: multi -purpose meeting/party rooms, rental office, ancillary retail space and a
small business center; said recreational space includes a swimming pool, a whirlpool spa, a Bar-
B-Que area and landscaped areas for sunning as well as a fitness center with exercise room,
lockers and sanitary facilities. The PROJECT will also provide a total of 510 parking spaces.
The ownership, operation and maintenance of common areas and facilities will be by the
property owner or (in the case of the property being converted to condominiums) a mandatory
property owner association in perpetuity pursuant to a recorded Declaration of Covenants and
Restrictions.
The Major Use Special Permit Application for the PROJECT also encompasses, but is
not exclusively limited to, the following lower ranking Special Permits:
CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, for a Federal Aviation Authority
Clearance letter;
CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 906.6, for active recreational
facilities (including a swimming pool);
CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT to permit staging and parking during construction (to be
approved prior to obtaining a building permit from the Department of Planning);
CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT' for development signs when combined with construction
signs;
CLASS 11 SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 15, Section 1511, for development between
Biscayne Bay and the first dedicated public right-of-way;
Page 2 of 7
0
CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 15 for conformity of landscaping guides. and
standards;
CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 923, for reduction in loading
berth dimensions;
Waiver from the City Commission for the following:
l . Waterfront open spaces and setbacks as specified on the plans on file; and
2. Provisions of the Noise Ordinance during the required concrete pours for
construction of the building.
Pursuant to Articles 13 and 17 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, approval of the requested
Major Use Special Permit shall be considered sufficient for the subordinate permits requested
and referenced above as well as any other special approvals required by the City of Miami which
may be required to carry out the requested plans.
The PROJECT shall be constructed substantially in accordance with plans and design
schematics on file prepared by Wolfberg, Alvarez & Partners, dated November, 1999; the
landscape plan shall be implemented substantially in accordance with plans and design
schematics on file prepared by Laura Llerena, dated November, 1999, said design and landscape
plans may be permitted to be modified only to the extent necessary to comply with the conditions
for approval imposed herein; all modifications shall be subject to the review and approval of the
Director of the Department of Planning prior to the issuance of any building permits.
The PROJECT conforms to the requirements of the R-4 Zoning District, as contained in
Zoning Ordinance No. 11000.
The existing comprehensive plan future land use designation allows the proposed mix of
commercial and residential uses.
CONDITIONS
THE APPLICANT, ITS SUCCESSORS, AND/OR ASSIGNS, JOINTLY OR
SEVERALLY, PRIOR T'O THE ISSUANCE OF ANY BUILDING PERMITS, SHALL
COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING:
Page 3 of 7� •� —t -�-
1. Meet all applicable building codes, land development regulations, ordinances and
other laws.
2. Pay all applicable fees due prior to the issuance of a building permit.
3. Allow the Miami Police Department to conduct a security survey, at the option of
said Department, and to make recommendations concerning security measures
and systems; further submit a report to the Department of Planning, prior to
commencement of construction, demonstrating how the Police Department
recommendations, if any, have been incorporated into the PROJECT security and
construction plans, or demonstrate to the Director of the Department of Planning
why such recommendations are impractical.
4. Provide a letter from the Department of Fire -Rescue indicating APPLICANT'S
coordination with members of the Fire Plan Review Section at the Department of
Fire -Rescue in the review of the scope of the PROJECT, owner , responsibility,
building development process and review procedures, as well as specific
requirements for fire protection and life safety systems, exiting, vehicular access
and water supply.
5. Provide a letter of assurance from the Department .of Solid Waste that the
PROJECT has addressed all concerns of the said Department.
6. Prepare a Minority Participation and Employment Plan (including a
Contractor/Subcontractor Participation Plan) to be submitted to the City of
Miami's Director of Equal Employment Opportunity for review and comments,
with the understanding that the APPLICANT must use its best efforts to follow
the City of Miami's Minority/Women Business Affairs and procurement
requirements as set forth in Sections 18-136 through 18-146 of the Code of the
City of Miami, Florida, as amended.
7. Record the following in the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida: (a) a
Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions providing that the ownership, operation
Page 4 of 7
and maintenance of all common areas and facilities will be by the property owner
or a mandatory property owner association in perpetuity; (b) a certified copy of
the Development Order specifying that the Development Order runs with the land
and is binding on the APPLICANT, its successors, and assigns, jointly or
severally.
8. Demonstrate to the City of Miami that the PROJECT has either: (a) completed its
condominium requirements and has been approved for such by the State of
Florida; or (b) provide the City of Miami with an executed, recordable unity of
title or covenant in lieu of unity of title agreement for the subject property, subject
to the review by, and in a form acceptable to, the City Attorney.
9. Provide the Department of Public Works with plans for proposed sidewalk and
swale area improvements for their review and approval prior to the issuance of a
building permit.
10. Provide the Department of Planning with a temporary parking plan which
addresses construction employee parking during the construction period; said plan
shall be subject to the review and approval by the Department of Planning prior to
the issuance of any building permits.
11. As may be requested by the Departments of Fire -Rescue and General Services
Administration, the roof area of the proposed structure shall be made available at
no charge to the City of Miami for any necessary communications equipment.
12. The APPLICANT shall retain the services of an archeological consultant who will
be responsible for conducting archeological monitoring of all ground disturbing
activity as well as the subsequent recovery of artifacts. Said consultant shall work
at the direction of the Miami -Dade County Archeologist and shall provide reports
to both that office and to the City of Miami.
13. The APPLICANT shall submit a final revised landscape plan with all
specifications for the review and approval of the Department of Planning prior to
Page S of 7 ft �� `- vs
QJ �
the issuance of a building permit; said plan shall address the concerns of the
Department of Planning and the Urban Development Review Board regarding
Brickell Avenue.
14. The APPLICANT shall comply with the conditions of the Miami -Dade Shoreline
Development Review Committee Resolution No. 99-SDRC-2.
THE CITY OF MIAMI SHALL:
Establish the effective date of this Permit as being thirty (30) days from the date of its
issuance with the issuance date constituting the commencement of the thirty (30) day
period to appeal from the provisions of the Permit.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
The Brickell Bay Village Project, proposed by Coral Way Investments, Inc.
("APPLICANT") complies with the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000, is
consistent with the orderly development and goals of the City of Miami, and complies with local
land development regulations and further, pursuant to Section 1703 of Zoning Ordinance
No. 11000:
(1) the PROJECT will have a favorable impact on the economy of the City of
Miami; and
(2) the PROJECT will efficiently use public transportation facilities; and
(3) the PROJECT will favorably affect the need for people to find adequate
housing reasonably accessible to their places of employment; and
(4) the PROJECT will efficiently use necessary public facilities; and
(5) the PROJECT will not negatively impact the environment and natural
resources of the City of Miami; and
(6) the PROJECT will not adversely affect public safety; and
(7) the public welfare will be served by the PROJECT; and
CJ 4! ^ C1 it
Page 6 of 7
PIN
(8) any potentially adverse effects of the PROJECT will be mitigated through
conditions of this Major Use Special Permit.
The proposed development does not unreasonably interfere with the achievement of the
objectives of the adopted State Land Development Plan applicable to the City of Miami.
Pursuant to Section 1305 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, the specific site plan aspects
of the PROJECT i.e., ingress and egress, offstreet parking and loading, refuse and service areas,
signs and lighting, utilities, drainage and control of potentially adverse effects generally have
been considered and will be further considered administratively during the process of issuing
individual building permits and certificates of occupancy.
W3491 AttachRS2
Page 7 of 7 a J �9 — - G i
EXHIBIT AB.
Lot 65 and 66, Block B of FLAGLER SUBDIVISION according to the Plat thereof as
recorded in Plat Book 5, at Page 44 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida,
together with a portion of Bay Bottom lying Southeasterly of and adjacent to said lots 65
and 66. All being more particularly described as follows:
Begin at the most Northerly comer of the aforesaid lot 65; thence run S.520-50'-14" W.,
along the Northwesterly line of said lots 65 and 66, for 200.00 feet; Thence run S.370-09'
46 E., along the Southwesterly boundary of said lot 66 and its Southeasterly prolongation,
for 732.65 feet to an intersection with the established Bulkhead line, according to the Plat
thereof as recorded in Plat Book 74, at Page 3 of the Public Records of Dade County,
Florida; Thence run N.41'-26 -30" E., along said Bulkhead line for 203.98 feet to an
intersection with the Southeasterly prolongation of the Northeasterly boundary line of said
lot 65; Thence run iV.3r-091-W w., Along the Northam e
bf sad lot Southeasterly prolongation for 692.34 feet to -the POINT OF BEGINNING. r Said d5escrbW' -
parcel of land containing 142,482.04 Sq. Ft. (3.271 Acres +/ j — -
also known as
All of Lots 65 and 66, Block "B", FLAMER SUBDIVISION, as recorded in Plat Book 5,
Page 44, Public Records of Dade County, Florida, and the following described parcel of
land:
Commencing at the Southwesterly comer of said Lot 66, thence run South 37 degrees 9
minutes 46 seconds East for a distance of 183.97 feet to a point Said point also being on
the Dade County Bulkhead line; thence run North 41 degrees 26 minutes 30 seconds East
along said Bulkhead line to a distance of 203.98 feet to a point; thence run North 37
degrees 9 minutes 26 seconds West a distance of 197.75 feet, said point also being the
Southeasterly comer of Lot 65; thence Southwesterly meandering along the high-water line
of Biscayne Bay a distance of 202 feet more or less to the point of beginning.
Ks"�,5f"�,22
,
r W
`4 l
71
BRICKELL BAY VILLAGE
MODIFICATIONS TO PREVIOUS MUSP
SUBMISSION
ZONING DATA Revised November 23, 1999
SITE :
2101-2105 Brickell Avenue
Miami, Florida
LEGAL DESCRIPTION : Lot 65 and 66, Block B of FLAGLER SUBDIVISION according to
the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 5, at Page 44 of the Public
Records of Dade County, Florida, together with a portion of Bay
bottom lying Southeasterly of and adjacent to said Lots 65 and 66,
all being more particularly described as follows;
Begin at the most (Northeasterly) corner of the aforementioned Lot
65; Thence run S 62' 50' 14" W along the Northwesterly line of
said Lots 65 and 66 and a distance of 200 feet to a point. Thence
run S 37' 09' 46" E, along the Southwesterly boundary of said
Lot 65 and its Southeasterly prolongation for a distance of 732.65
feet to a point of intersection with the established Blockhead Line
according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 74 at Page 3,
of the Public Records of Dade County Florida; Thence run N
41 °26'30" E along said Bulkhead Line for a distance of 203.98 feet
to a point of intersection with the Southeasterly prolongation of the
Northeasterly boundary line of said Lot 65, Thence run (N 37° 09'
46" W) along the Northeasterly line said Lot 65 and its
Southeasterly prolongation for a distance of 892.35 feet to the
POINT OF BEGINNING. Said described parcel of land containing
142,482 square feet (3.27 Acres, more or less)
SITE ZONING R-4
As described by Article IV, Sec. 401 (R-4 Multifamily High
Density Residential) of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami,
Florida
PERMITTED USES: As described by Article IV, Sec. 401 (R-4 Multifamily High
Density Residential) of the Zoning Ordinance for the City of
Miami, Florida, the permitted uses are, but not limited to Multiple -
family buildings.
DENSITY:
Max. Permitted As per Article IV, Sec. 401, the number of dwellings is determined
by a maximum net density of 150 units per acre.
(3.27 acres x 150 units per acre = 490 units maximum)
Proposed : 359 Units (131 units less than the maximum allowed)
11/23/99 1 of 5
Prepared by Wolfberg Alvarez & Partners (� 9
U tl c1!
NET LOT AREA 142,498 sq. ft.
3.2713 acres
* (As per site area calculations submitted by High Surveying & Mapping,
9/29/98)
GROSS LOT AREA As per Article XXV, Sec 2502, gross lot area is defined as, "the net
lot area, plus half of adjoining street rights -of -way and 70 ft. of any
other public open space including, but not limited to bays.
(142,498 net lot area + 50,838 bay area + 10,000 Brickell Ave. area)
203,336 sq. ft.
4.668 acres
* (As per site area calculations submitted by High Surveying & Mapping.
9/29/98)
BUILDING FOOTPRINT :
Max. Permitted As described in Article IV, Sec. 401:
At Four -tenths (0.40) times the gross lot area equals
(203,336 sq. ft. x .40)
*81,334.4 sq. ft.
Proposed - 31,682 sq. ft.
Tower / Podium: Approx. 31,000 sq. ft.
Pool Gazebo: Approx. 682 sq. ft.
F.A.R. .
Max. Permitted : As described in Article IV, Sec. 401:
Base F.A.R. equals one and seventy -two -hundredths (1.72) times
the gross lot area :
203,336 sq. ft. x 1.72 = 349,737.92 sq. ft.
As per Article 5, Sec. 502 (c):
Additional 20% bonus ( 1.72 x .20 = .344 ) allowed under P.U.D
equals:
203,336 sq. ft x .344 = 69,947.58 sq. ft.
As allowed under the Low Income Housing Trust:
Additional 25% bonus ( 1.72 x .25 = .43 ) equals:
203,336 sq. ft x .43 = 87,434.48 sq. ft.
(Bonus not being used)
Max. Development Permitted with used bonuses
Adjusted F.A.R.: 1.72 + .344 + 0.0 = 2.064
203,336 sq. ft x 2.064= 419,685.50 sq. ft.
Proposed Approximately 410,026 sq. ft.
As defined by Sec 2502, Supp. No 3 of the Zoning Ordinance of the
City of Miami, for countable residential floor area.
(Approximately 9,659.5 sq. ft. below the maximum permitted)
1 1/23/99 2 of 5
Prepared by Wonerg Alvarez & Partners
NE
GREEN SPACE :
Minimum Required: As required by Article IV, Sec. 401
Fifteen -hundredths (0.15) times the gross lot area.
(203,336 sq. ft. x .15)
30,500.40 sq. ft.
Proposed :
SETBACKS:
Approx. 38,877 sq. ft.
Required : As required by Article IV, Sec. 401 Supp. No-3 of the Zoning
Ordinance of City of Miami, Florida, the minimum setbacks are as
follows:
Front ( Brickell Avenue): 20 ft. min.
Side: (10 ft.)
Rear: (10 ft.)
For buildings which abut a right-of-way of one hundred (100) feet
or more in width, the maximum height of a building at its base
building line is two hundred forty (240) feet; portions of the
buildings above that point (two hundred forty (240) feet in height)
shall not exceed a height as delineated by a sixty (60) degree
inward -sloping plane measured by a ratio of one (1) horizontal and
two (2) vertical measured from said point.
Required As also required by Article III, Sec. 33D-38 of the Shoreline
Development Review of the Zoning Ordinance of Dade County,
Florida, the minimum setbacks are as follows:
Shoreline: (25 ft). (For building less than 35 ft. in height)
75 ft. (For buildings exceeding 35 ft. in height,
the setback shall be increased by 50% of
the additional height of the building to a
Side: 25 ft. maximum setback of 75 ft.)
Required As per Sec. 3 CHT:9(mm)(ii)(A) and (B) of the City of Miami
Charter, all surface parking or enclosed structures shall:
Shoreline: be set back at least 50 ft. from the seawall (or rear
Aggregate bulkhead as per Zoning Director's interpretation).
Side Yard: have an average side yard equal in aggregate to at
least 25% of the waters frontage of each lot based
on average lot width.
Average Width of lot: 200 ft.
Aggregate Visual corridor: 50 ft. min.
11 /23/99
Prepared by Wolfberg Alvarez & Partners 3 of 5
:9— 96bi
f
Proposed : Front (Brickell Avenue):
(Approximates) Tower:
Podium:
Shoreline (Rear):
Tower:
Pool Gazebo:
Side (North East):
Tower:
Pool Gazebo:
Side (South West):
Tower:
Podium:
Pool Gazebo:
Aggregate Side Yard:
VISUAL CORRIDOR :
53'-9" not inclusive of balconies
116'-4"
260'-8"
48'-1"
66'-0", not inclusive of balconies
92'-7"
70'-3", not inclusive of balconies
25'-2"
87'-10"
91'-2", not inclusive of balconies
(25'-2" + 66'-011)
Required : As required by Article III, Sec. 33D-38 of the Shoreline
Development Review of the Zoning Ordinance of Dade County,
Florida, an unimpeded visual corridor to the Biscayne Bay of 20%
of the width of the lot (up to 100 ft.) shall be provided on one side
of the parcel. The minimum width of the corridor shall be 20 ft.
Width of lot: 200 ft.
Visual Corridor: 40 ft.
Proposed Approx. 66'-0", not inclusive of balconies
PARKING :
Required :
As required by Article IV, Sec. 401 of the Zoning Ordinance of City
of Miami, Florida, the amount of required parking is as follows:
One (1) space for each efficiency or one -bedroom, and Two (2)
spaces for each two -bedroom unit or each three -bedroom unit. In
addition, one (1) space for every ten (10) units designated for
visitors.
Unit Type
Number
of units
Parking Required
Studio
44
44
One Bedroom
224
224
Two Bedroom
80
160
Three Bedroom
10
20
Mgr.'s Suite (2 B)
1
Subtotal
359
2
450
Visitors (450 / 10)
Total
359
45
495
Proposed : 510 parking spaces, inclusive of 11 spaces for the physically
disabled, (at 2% of total)
11 /23/99
Prepared by Wolfberg Alvarez & Partners 4 of 5
w ('wE'ti
N-
OFFSTREET LOADING :
Required As required by Article IV, Supp. No. 3, Sec. 401, offstreet loading
requirements are the same as in the R-3 district.
In the R-3 district, for buildings in excess of 25,000 sq. ft. and up to
500,000 sq. ft. of gross building area the number of required berths
shall be as follows:
One (1) berth (12W x 35i✓ x 15HT) for every one hundred (100)
residential units or fraction thereof. And in addition, One (1) berth
(10W x 20L) for every thirty (30) residential units or fraction
thereof.
As per the zoning departments interpretation
For 359 units,
300 units @ 1 berth / 100 units = 3 berths @ 12' wide x
35' long x 15' high
With 59 units remaining
59 units @ I berth / 30 units = 1.97 = 2 berth @ 10' wide x
20' long
Under a Class II, we may request a special permit to reduce the size
of the berths.
Proposed 2 berths @ 12' wide x 35' long x 15' high
3 berths @ 10' wide x 20' long
MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT :
Allowed : Unlimited.
11/23/99 5 of 5
Prepared by Wolfberg Alvarez & Partners
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF DADE
CITY OF MIAMI
I, WALTER J. FOEMAN, City Clerk of the City of Miami, Florida, and keeper of the
records thereof, do hereby certify that the attached Resolution No. 99-961 is a true and correct copy
of a resolution passed and adopted by the City Commission at the meeting held on the 1411 day of
December, 1999. The attached Resolution corrects, nunc pro tunc, clerical errors inadvertently set
forth in a prior version of Resolution No. 99-961 and Exhibits "A" and "C". Resolution No. 99-961,
in the form attached hereto, supersedes and corrects any prior version of said Resolution.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hereunto set my hand and impress the Official Seal of the City
of Miami this 16th day of March ,2000.
WALTER 4J. FOE Jerk, Miami, Florida
(OFFICIAL SEAL)
J- 477RS
121 199
� a
RESOLUTION NO.'-# � GI
A RESOLUTION OF THE MIAMI CITY COMMISSION, WITH
ATTACHMENT(S), APPROVING WITH CONDITIONS, A
JOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT DEVELOPMENT ORDER
P RSUANT TO ARTICLES 5, 13 AND 17 OF ZONING
O ANCE NO. 11000, FOR THE BRICKELL BAY VILLAGE
PRO CT, TO BE LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY 2101-2105
BRIC L AVENUE, MIAMI, FLORIDA, TO BE COMPRISED
OF NOT ORE THAN 424 359 UNITS, WITH ACCESSORY
RECREATI AL SPACE AND b3-2 510 PARKING SPACES;
DIRECTING ' NSMITTAL OF THE HEREIN RESOLUTION;
MAKING FIND GS OF FACT AND STATING CONCLUSIONS
OF LAW; PROVID G FOR BINDING EFFECT; CONTAINING A
SEVERABILITY USE AND PROVIDING FOR AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, on March 5, 1999, Cara ay Investments, Inc., ("APPLICANT"), submitted a
complete Application for Major Use Special en -nit for the Brickell Bay Village Project
("PROJECT") pursuant to Articles 5, 9, 13 and 17 0\oninjOrdinance of the City of Miami, Florida, as amende
property located at approximately 2101-2105 Brickell Avenue,
on Exhibit "B", attached d hereto and in Exhibit "A", the Deve
Ordinance -No. 11000, the Zoning
g Ordinance No. 11000") , for the
i, Florida, as legally described
Order attached hereto; and
WHEREAS, development of the PROJECT requires the issuan\of a Major Use Special
Permit Development Order pursuant to Article 17 of Zoning Ordinance No. 000; and
WHEREAS, the Large Scale Development Committee met on Novem r 12, 1998, to
consider the proposed PROJECT and offer its input; and
[Note: This second original
Resolution 99-961 was replaced
by a third original resolution
which corrects nunc pro tune
inadvertently set forth in i" _ _.....__ '
this second version
including exhibits A & C, A 7 7
�be111!, �rl �E
I" 7 �r16J27 and is therefore super-
seded b • the third g `'
Resolution 99-961.]
CITY COMMISSION
MEETING OF
DEC I r; 1299
fiesolution No.
0")— 9 14'
H1-
WHEREAS, the APPLICANT has modified the proposed PROJECT to address the expressed
technical ncerns raised at said Large Scale Development Committee meeting; and
WHE AS, the Urban Development Review Board met on December 7, 1998, to consider
the proposed PRO%co
and recommended approval of the PROJECT subject to complying with
staff requirementsand
the landscape plan as it pertained to preservation of trees along
Brickell Avenue and othe erimeter landscape issues; and
WHEREAS, the Mi i Planning Advisory Board, at its meeting held on May 19,1999, Item
No. 1, following an advertised p lic hearing, adopted Resolution No. PAB 21-99 by a vote of seven
to one (7-1), RECOMMENDING D NIAL of the Major Use Special Permit Development Order as
attached hereto; and
amended; and
on
and
Ad
221
on December 6, 1999,_the Director otVlanninLy and
the determination by the Zo
fo
of Zoninz Ordinance 11000, as amended; and
at its
o. P.
even to zero (7-0), RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of the
[Note: This second original resolution
99-961 was replaced by a third Page 2 of 7
original resolution which corrects
nunc pro tunc inadvertently set forth in
this second version, including exhibits �J
A & C, and is therefore superseded by the
third Resolution 99-961.]
and
S, the City Commission, netAithstanding a t of the Pimmi "`
�CCC 11 �G11QQC[OlY OZ Cli�IZ RI�[1Z1�
Miami to issue a
NOW,
MIAMI, FLORIDA:
it advisable and in the best interest of the general welfare of the City of
Use Special Permit Development Order as hereinafter set forth;
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
Section 1. The recitk- and findings contained in the Preamble to this Resolution are
hereby adopted by reference thereto d incorporated herein as if fully set forth in this Section.
Section 2. A Major Use Spe ' 1 Permit Development Order, attached hereto as Exhibit
"A" and made a part hereof, is hereby a roved subject to the conditions specified in said
Development order, per Article 17 of Zoning OrXnance No. 11000, the Zoning Ordinance of the
City of Miami, Florida, as amended ("Zoning Ordina%e No. 11000"), for the Brickell Bay Village
Project ("PROJECT") to be developed by Coral Way\nvestments, Inc. ("APPLICANT"), at
approximately 2101-2105 Brickell Avenue, Miami, Florida, i\theco
larly described on Exhibit
"B", attached .hereto and made a part hereof.
Section 3. The PROJECT is hereby approved fruction of upto 42-1 359
residential units, with accessory recreational uses and 632 510 parking
Section 4. The Major Use Special Permit Application for
encompasses the lower ranking Special Permits as set forth in the Development
Exhibit "A" hereto and incorporated herein.
[Note: This second Resolution 99-961
was replaced by a third original
resolution which corrects nunc pro
tune inadvertently set forth in Page 3 of 7
this second version including
exhibits A & C, and is therefore
superseded by the third Resolution 99-961.1
ROJECT also
attached as
ction 5.
subject PR CT:
a. T
Neil
b. The
The findings of fact set forth below are hereby made with respect to the
PROJECT is in conformity with the adopted Miami Comprehensive
No. 11000.
Plan 1989-2000, as amended.
is in accord with the R-4 Zoning classifications of Zoning Ordinance
C. Pursuant to Sectio 1305 of the Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, the specific site plan
aspects of the PROJ CT, i.e. , ingress and egress, parking, signs and lighting,
utilities, drainage, prese tion of natural features and control of potentially adverse
effects generally, have b n considered and will be further considered
administratively during the pros s of issuing a building permit and a certificate of
occupancy.
d. The PROJECT is expected to cost ap oximately $88 million, and to employ
approximately 224 workers during constructi (full time employees); the PROJECT
will also result in the creation of approximat 10 permanent new jobs. The
PROJECT will generate approximately $5.4 million ually in tax revenues to local
units of government (of which approximately $696,364 ,A 1 go to the City of Miami)
(1999 dollars).
e. The City Commission further finds that:
(1) the PROJECT will have a favorable impact on the economy the City of
Miami;
[Note: This second original Resolution
99-961. was replaced by a third original
Resolution which corrects nunc pro tunc
inadvertently set forth in this second
version including exhibits A & C, Page 4 of 7
and is therefore superseded by the third
Resolution 99-961.] ��ro
the PROJECT will efficiently use public transportation
facilities;
(3) an\potentially adverse effects of the PROJECT will be mitigated through
compl\etheconditions of this Major Use Special Permit;
(4) the Pavorably affect the need for people to find adequate
housinccessible to their places of employment;
(5) the PRficiently use necessary public facilities;
(6) the Pi t negatively impact the environment and natural
resources of the City;
(7) the PROJECT will not advers\andevi
iving conditions in the neighborhood;
(8) the PROJECT will not adverpublic safety;
(9) based on the record presentednce presented, the public welfare will
be served by the PROJECT; and
(10) any potentially adverse effects of the P\Rarising from safety and
security, fire protection and life safety, heritage conservation,
trees, shoreline development, minority and employment, and
minority contractor/subcontractor particb mitigated through
compliance with the conditions of this Mecial ermit.
Section 6. The Major Use Special Permit, as appronded, sh 1 be binding
upon the APPLICANT and any successors in interest.
Section 7. The application for Major Use Special Permit, which was submit d on
March 5, 1999, (as amended on November 18, 1999) and on file with the Department of Planning
[Note: This second original Resolution
99-961 was replaced by a third Page 5 of 7
original resolution which corrects nunc
pro tunc inadvertently set forth in this 0
second version including exhibits A & C, and
is thereforesuperseded by the third Resolution
99-961.]
rY �#
4
the City of Miami, Florida, shall be relied upon generally for administrative interpretations and is
part hereof by reference.
S •tion 8. This Major Use Special Permit will expire two (2) years from its effective date
which is thirty 0) days after the adoption of the herein Resolution.
Section 9. The City Manager is hereby directed to instruct the Director of the Department
of Planning to transmi copy of this Resolution and attachment to the developers: Osvaldo R.
Orozco, Esquire, on behalf Coral Way Investment, Inc., 2500 First Union Financial Center, 200
South Biscayne Boulevard, Mi i, Florida 33131-2336.
Section 10. The Findings Fact and Conclusions of Law are made with respect to the
PROJECT as described in the Develop nt Order for the Brickell Bay Village Project, which is
attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and made a p hereof by reference, as more particularly described in
Exhibit "A".
Section 11. The Major Use Special
Village Project (Exhibit "A") is hereby granted and i
Development Order for the Brickell Bay
Section 12. In the event that any portion or section
order (Exhibit "A") is determined to be invalid, illegal, or
Resolution or the Development
by a court or agency of
competent jurisdiction, such decision shall in no manner affect the\maining portions of this
Resolution or Development Order (Exhibit "A") which shall remain in ful orce and effect.
Section 13. This Resolution shall become effective thirty (30) days a r its adoptionY
[Note: This second original Resolution 99-961 was replaced
by a third original resolution which corrects nunc pro tunc
inadvertently set forth in this second version including
exhibits A C;�nd is therefore superseded by the third re so
99-961].
If the Mayor does not sign this Resolution, it shall become effective at the end of ten ca dar
days from the date it was passed and adopted. If the Mayor vetoes this Resolution, it shall
become effective immediately upon override of the veto by the City Commission.
Page 6 of 7
SED AND ADOPTED this 14'h day of December , 1999.
ATTEST:
WALTER J. FOEMAN
CITY CLERK
Y
91 RS
JOE CAROLLO, MAYOR
In accordance with Miami Code Sec. 2-36, since the
indicate approval of this
legislation by signing it in the designated place
provided, said legislation now becomes effective with
the elapse of ten (10) days from the date of
Commission action regarding same, without the
Mayor exercising a veto.
In e=rdance with Miami Cads Sec. 2-36, since t Mayor did not indicaty npprov;-1 of
this: legislation by signing it in the designated pia provided, c".'d Ic0;5�'o„ ha..I
Iecomes effective with the elapse of ten (10) day from date of ti'r119 .o5tor► a CT. -
regarding same, without the Mayor exercising eAeto. /)
• al r'7-Foeman, City Clerk
[Note: This second original Resolution 99-961 was replaced by a third
original resolution which corrects nunc pro tunc inadvertently set forth in
this second version including exhibits A & C, and is therefore superseded by
the third Resolution 99-9611.
Page 7 of 7
EXHIBIT "A"
ATTACHMENT TO
RESOLUTION NO.
DATE:
BRICKELL BAY VILLAGE PROJECT
MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT
DEVELOPMENT ORDER
Let it be known that pursuant to Articles 5,-9 13 and 17 of Ordinance No. 11000, the Zoning
Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended ("Zoning Ordinance No. 11000"), the
Commission of the City of Miami, Florida, has considered in a public hearing, the issuance of a
Major Use Special Permit for the Brickell Bay Village Project ("PROJECT") to be located at
approximately 2101-2105 Brickell Avenue, Miami, Florida; see legal description on Exhibit "B",
attached hereto and made a part hereof; said legal description being subject to any dedications,
limitations, restrictions, reservations or easements of record.
After due consideration of the recommendations of the Planning Advisory Board and after
due consideration of the consistency of this proposed development with the Miami Comprehensive
Neighborhood Plan, the City Commission has approved the PROJECT, and subject to the following
conditions approves the Major Use Special Permit and hereby issues this Permit:
FINDINGS OF FACT
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
The proposed Brickell Bay Village Project is a residential development to be located at
approximately 2101-2105 Brickell Avenue, Miami, Florida. The PROJECT is located on a gross lot
Page 1 of 10
area of approximately 4.668 acres and a net lot area of approximately 3.2713 acres of land (more
specifically described on Exhibit "B", incorporated herein by reference). The remainder of the
PROJECT's VITAL DATA is attached hereto as EXHIBIT "C", and incorporated herein by
reference.
The proposed PROJECT will consist of not more than 4.24. 359 residential units in a single 24
narking struetufe26 story tower over a narking structure
consisting of two levels below ground narking and two levels above ground with accessory
recreational space and a lobby consisting of the following accessory uses: multi -purpose
meeting/party rooms, rental office, ancillary retail space and a small business center; said
recreational space includes a swimming pool, a whirlpool spa, a Bar-B-Que area and landscaped
areas for sunning as well as a fitness center with exercise room, lockers and sanitary facilities. The
PROJECT will also provide a total of 63-2 510 parking spaces.
The ownership, operation and maintenance of common areas and facilities will be by the
properly owner or (in the case of the property being converted to condominiums) a mandatory
property owner association in perpetuity pursuant to a recorded Declaration of Covenants and
Restrictions.
The Major Use Special Permit Application for the PROJECT also encompasses, but is not
exclusively limited to, the following lower ranking Special Permits:
CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, for a Federal Aviation Authority Clearance
letter;
CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 906.6, for active recreational facilities
(including a swimming pool);
Page 2 of 10
CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT to permit staging and parking during construction (to be
approved prior to obtaining a building permit from the Department of Planning);
CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT for development signs when combined with construction signs;
CLASS II SPECIAL. PERMIT as per Article 15, Section 1511, for development between
Biscayne Bay and the first dedicated public right-of-way;
CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 15 for conformity of landscaping guides and
standards;
CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 923, for reduction in loading berth
dimensions;
Waiver from the City Commission for the following:
1. Waterfront open spaces and setbacks as specified on the plans on file; and
2. Provisions of the Noise Ordinance during the required concrete pours for
construction of the building.
Pursuant to Articles 13 and 17 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, approval of the requested
Major Use Special Permit shall be considered sufficient for the subordinate permits requested and
referenced above as well as any other special approvals required by the City of Miami which may be
required to carry out the requested plans.
The PROJECT shall be constructed substantially in accordance with plans and design
schematics on file prepared by Wolfberg, Alvarez & Partners, dated mar} November, 1999; the
landscape plan shall be implemented substantially in accordance with plans and design schematics
on file prepared by Laura Llerena, dated f afy November, 1999, said design and landscape plans
may be permitted to be modified only to the extent necessary to comply with the conditions for
Page 3 of 10
J
G)
approval imposed herein; all modifications shall be subject to the review and approval of the
Director of the Department of Planning prior to the issuance of any building permits.
The PROJECT' conforms to the requirements of the R-4 Zoning District, as contained in
Zoning Ordinance No. 11000.
The existing comprehensive plan future land use designation allows the proposed mix of
commercial and residential uses.
CONDITIONS
THE APPLICANT, ITS SUCCESSORS, AND/OR ASSIGNS, JOINTLY OR SEVERALLY,
PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF ANY BUILDING PERMITS, SHALL COMPLY WITH THE
FOLLOWING:
1. Meet all applicable building codes, land development regulations, ordinances and
other laws.
2. Pay all applicable fees due prior to the issuance of a building permit.
3. Allow the Miami Police Department to conduct a security survey, at the option of
said Department, and to make recommendations concerning security measures and
systems; further submit a report to the Department of Planning, prior to
commencement of construction, demonstrating how the Police Department
recommendations, if any, have been incorporated into the PROJECT security and
construction plans, or demonstrate to the Director of the Department of Planning why
such recommendations are impractical.
4. Provide a letter from the Department of Fire -Rescue indicating APPLICANT'S
coordination with members of the Fire Plan Review Section at the Department of
Page 4 of 10
— Q)
Fire -Rescue in the review of the scope of the PROJECT, owner , responsibility,
building development process and review procedures, as well as specific
requirements for fire protection and life safety systems, exiting, vehicular access and
water supply.
5. Provide a letter of assurance from the Department .of Solid Waste that the PROJECT
has addressed all concerns of the said Department.
6. Prepare a Minority Participation and Employment Plan (including a
Contractor/Subcontractor Participation Plan) to be submitted to the City of Miami's
Director of Equal Employment Opportunity for review and continents, with the
understanding that the APPLICANT must use its best efforts to follow the City of
Miami's Minority/Women Business Affairs and procurement requirements as set
forth in Sections 18-136 through 18-146 of the Code of the City of Miami, Florida, as
amended.
7. Record the following in the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida: (a) a
Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions providing that the ownership, operation
and maintenance of all common areas and facilities will be by the property owner or a
mandatory property owner association in perpetuity; (b) a certified copy of the
Development Order specifying that the Development Order runs with the land and is
binding on the APPLICANT, its successors, and assigns, jointly or severally.
8. Demonstrate to the City of Miami that the PROJECT has either: (a) completed its
condominium requirements and has been approved for such by the State of Florida;
or (b) provide the City of Miami with an executed, record able unity of title or
Page 5 of 10
Cy 9 � 0 1
covenant in lieu of unity of title agreement for the subject property, subject to the
review by, and in a form acceptable to, the City Attorney.
9. Provide the Department of Public Works with plans for proposed sidewalk and swale
area improvements for their review and approval prior to the issuance of a building
permit.
10. Provide the Department of Planning with a temporary parking plan which addresses
construction employee parking during the construction period; said plan shall be
subject to the review and approval by the Department of Planning prior to the
issuance of any building permits.
developer- shall pay $583,184 'ISM to the City fAX •1nffv a uv�,iij.. o� •r
fust
12. As may be requested by the Departments of Fire -Rescue and General Services
Administration, the roof area of the proposed structure shall be made available at no
charge to the City of Miami for any necessary communications equipment.
13. The APPLICANT shall retain the services of an archeological consultant who will be
responsible for conducting archeological monitoring of all ground disturbing activity
as well as the subsequent recovery of artifacts. Said consultant shall work at the
direction of the Miami -Dade County Archeologist and shall provide reports to both
that office and to the City of Miami.
Page 6 of 10
wl
14. The APPLICANT shall submit a final revised landscape plan with all specifications
for the review and approval of the Department of Planning prior to the issuance of a
building permit; said plan shall address the concerns of the Department of Planning
and the Urban Development Review Board regarding Brickell Avenue.
15. The APPLICANT shall comply with the conditions of the Miami -Dade Shoreline
Development Review Committee Resolution No. 99-SDRC-2.
THE CITY OF MIAMI SHALL:
Establish the effective date of this Permit as being thirty (30) days from the date of its
issuance with the issuance date constituting the commencement of the thirty (30) day period
to appeal from the provisions of the Permit.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
The Brickell Bay Village Project, proposed by Coral Way Investments, Inc. ("APPLICANT")
complies with the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000, is consistent with the
orderly development and goals of the City of Miami, and complies with local land development
regulations and further, pursuant to Section 1703 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000:
(1) the PROJECT will have a favorable impact on the economy of the City of
Miami; and
(2) the PROJECT will efficiently use public transportation facilities; and
(3) the PROJECT will favorably affect the need for people to find adequate
housing reasonably accessible to their places of employment; and
(4) the PROJECT will efficiently use necessary public facilities; and
Page 7 of 10
H
tAy$�ry
(5) the PROJECT will not negatively impact the environment and natural
resources of the City of Miami; and
(6) the PROJECT will not adversely affect public safety; and
(7) the public welfare will be served by the PROJECT; and
(8) any potentially adverse effects of the PROJECT will be mitigated through
conditions of this Major Use Special Permit.
The proposed development does not unreasonably interfere with the achievement of the objectives of
the adopted State Land Development Plan applicable to the City of Miami.
Pursuant to Section 1305 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, the specific site plan aspects of the
PROJECT i.e., ingress and egress, offstreet parking and loading, refuse and service areas, signs and
lighting, utilities, drainage and control of potentially adverse effects generally have been considered
and will be further considered administratively during the process of issuing individual building
permits and certificates of occupancy.
W3491 AttachRS
Page 8 of 10
------------------ COMPARISON OF FOOTNOTES ------------------
-FOOTNOTE 1-
the Mayor does not sign this Resolution, it shall become effective at the end of ten calendar days
from the date it was passed and adopted. If the Mayor vetoes this Resolution, it shall become
effective immediately upon override of the veto by the City Commission.
------------------ COMPARISON OF FOOTERS------------------
-FOOTER 1-
G;\DMS\74168\ 13 246\0278298.01
2/1/2000
Page 9 of 10
This redlined draft; generated by CompareRite -Tie Instant Redli.ner, shows the differences between
original document : G:MMS\74168\13246\0278298.01
and revised document: G:\DMS\74168\13246\0278298.02
CompareRite found 13 change(s) in the text
CompareRite found 0 change(s) in the notes
Deletions appear as struck -through text
Additions appear as bold -underlined text
Page 10 of 10
9 EXHIBIT "E" I
Lot 65 and 66, Block B of FLAGLER SUBDIVISION according to the Plat thereof as
recorded in Plat Book 5, at Page 44 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida,
together with a portion of Bay Bottom lying Southeasterly of and adjacent to said lots 65
and 66. All being more particularly described as follows:
Begin at the most Northerly comer of the aforesaid lot 65; thence run S.52°-50'-14" W.,
along the Northwesterly line of said lots 65 and 66, for 200.00 feet; Thence run S.37°-09'
46" E., along the Southwesterly boundary of said lot 66 and its Southeasterly prolongation,
for 732.65 feet to an intersection with the established Bulkhead line, according to the Plat
thereof as recorded in Plat Book 74, at Page 3 of the Public Records of Dade County,
Florida; Thence run N.41 °-26'-30" E., along said Bulkhead line for 203.98 feet to an
intersection with the Southeasterly prolongation of the Northeasterly boundary line of said
lot 65; Thence run N.3r-09'-46" W.,'Along the NortheastBrly'line of said lot 65 and ifis
Southeasterly prolongation for 692.34 feet to -the POINT. OF BEGINNING. Said described
parcel of land containing 142,482.04 Sq. Ft. (3.271 Acres +/-)
also known as
All of Lots 65 and 66, Block "B", FLAGLER SUBDIVISION, as recorded in Plat Book 5,
Page 44, Public Records of Dade County, Florida, and the following described parcel of
land:
Commencing at the Southwesterly comer of said Lot 66, thence run South 37 degrees 9
minutes 46 seconds East for a distance of 183.97 feet to a point. Said point also being on
the Dade County Bulkhead line; thence run North 41 degrees 26 minutes 30 seconds East
along said Bulkhead line to a distance of 203.98 feet to a point; thence run North 37
degrees 9 minutes 26 seconds West a distance of 197.75 feet, said point also being the
Southeasterly comer of Lot 65; thence Southwesterly meandering along the high-water line
of Biscayne Bay a distance of 202 feet more or less to the point of beginning.
G tOMS17 US1134=220042.01
12/ 18/98
OVA— 061
rp s, rEXHUNT "C`
BRICKELL BAY VILLAGE
VITAL Data Sheet
SITE:
2101 -2105 Brickell Avenue
Miami, Florida
• LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
See under Article I
• SITE ZONING:
R-4
As described by Article IV, Sec. 401 (R-4 Multifamily High Density Residential) of
the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida.
• PERMITTED USES:
As described by Article IV, Section 401 (R-4 Multifamily Hlgh Density Residential)
of the Zoning Ordinance for the City of Miami, Florida, the permitted uses are, but
not limited to multiple family buildings.
r
• DENSITY:
As per Article IV, Sec. 401, the number of dwellings is determined by a maximum
net density of 150 units per acre.
(3.27 acres x 150 units per acre = 490 units maximum)
• NET LOT AREA:
142,498 sq. ft.
3.2713 acres
'(As per the site area calculations submitted by High Surveying & Mapping, 9/29/98)
GROSS LOT AREA:
As per Article XXV, Sec. 2502, gross lot area is defined as, 'the net lot area, plus
half of adjoining street rights -of -way and 70 ft. of any other public open space
including, but not limited to, bays.
(142,498 net lot area + 50,838 bay area + 10,000 Brickell Ave. area)
203.336 sq. ft. ,
4.668 acres
'(As per the site area calculations submitted by High Surveying & Mapping, 9/29/98)
• BUILDING FOOTPRINT:
Max Permitted: As described in Article IV, Sec. 401:
At four -tenths (.40) times the gross lot area equals:
(203, 336 sq. ft. x .40)
*81, 334.4 sq. ft.
GADMSV3646\ 1134T.0220J S 8.01
12/22/98
Proposed:
44,902 sq. ft.
Tower/Podium: 44,227 sq. ft.
Pool Gazebo: 657 sq. ft.
• F.A.R.:
Max. Permitted:
As described in Article IV, Sec. 401:
Base F.A.R. equals one of seventy -two -hundredths
(1.72) times the gross lot area:
203,336 sq. ft. x 1.72 = 349,737.92 sq. ft.
As per Article 5, Sec. 502(c):
Additional 20% bonus (1.72 x .20 = .344) allowable
under P.U.D. equals:
203,336 sq. ft. x .344 = 69,947.58 sq. ft.
As allowed under the Low Income Housing Trust:
Additional 25% bonus (1.72 x .25 = .43) equals:
203,336 sq. ft. x .43 = 87,434.48 sq. ft.
Max. Development Permitted with all bonuses:
Adjusted F.A.R.: 1.72 + .344 + .43 = 2.494
203,336 sq. ft. x 2.494 = 507.119.98 sq. ft
Proposed:
504,040 sq. ft.
As defined by Sec 2502, Supp. no. 3 of the Zoning
Ordinance of the City of Miami, for countable residential
floor area.
• GREEN SPACE:
Minimum Required: As required by Article IV, Sec. 401
Fifteen -hundredths (0.15) times the gross lot area.
(203,336 sq. ft. x .15)
30,500.40 sq. ft.
Proposed:
40,066.76 sq. ft. '
• SETBACKS:
Required: As required by Article IV, Sec. 401 Supp. No. 3 of the
Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, the
minimum setbacks are as follows:
Front (Brickell Avenue): 20 ft. min.
Side: (10 ft.)
Rear: (10 ft.)
GADMS',73646\ 1134110220358.01
12/22/98
For buildings which abut a right-of-way of one hundred
(100) feet or more in width, the maximum height of a
building at its base building line is two hundred forty
(240) feet; portions of the building above that point (two
hundred forty (240) feet in height) shall not exceed a
heights as delineated by a sixty (60) degree inward -
sloping plane measured by a ratio of one (1) horizontal
and two (2) vertical measured from said point.
Required: As also required by Article III, Sec. 33D-38 of the
Shoreline Development Review of the Zoning
Ordinance of Dade County, Florida, the minimum
setbacks are as follows:
Shoreline: (25 ft.) (For building less than 35 ft.
in height)
75 ft. (For buildings exceeding 35
ft. in height, the setback
shall be increased by 50%
of the additional height of
the building to a maximum
Side: 25 ft. setback of 75 ft.)
Required: As per Sec. 3 CWT;(mm)(ii)(A) and (B) of the City of
Miami Charter, all surface parking or enclosed
structures shall:
Shoreline: be set back at least 50 ft. from the
seawall (or rear bulkhead as per Zoning
Director's interpretation).
Aggregate
Side Yard: have an average side yard equal in
aggregate to at least 25% of the waters
frontage of each lot based on average lot
width.
Average Width of lot: 200 ft.
Aggregate Visual corridor: 50 ft. min.
Proposed
GADMSV3646\ 11342\02203 S 8.01
12/22/98
Front (Brickell Avenue):
Tower:
Podium:
Shoreline (Rear):
7
87'-4" not inclusive of
balconies
116'-4"
Tower:
Pool Gazebo:
Side(North East):
146ft.-3"
58'-5"
45'-3", not inclusive of
balconies
Side (South West): 45'-3", not inclusive of
balconies
Tower: 87'-9", not inclusive of
balconies
Podium: 30"-0"
Pool Gazebo:76'-2"
Aggregate Side Yard: 75'-3", not inclusive of
® VISUAL CORRIDOR: balconies
Required: As required by Article II, Sec. 33D-38 of the Shoreline
Development Review of the Zoning Ordinance of Dade
County, Florida, an unimpeded visual corridor to the Biscayne
Bay of 20% of the width of the lot (up to 100 ft.) shall be
provided on one side of the parcel. The minimum width of the
corridor shall be 20 ft.
Width of lot: 200 ft.
Visual Corridor: 40 ft.
Proposed: 45'-3", not inclusive of balconies
• PARKING:
Required: As required by Article IV, Sec. 401 of the Zoning Ordinance of
City of Miami, Florida, the amount of required parking is as
follows:
• One (1) space for each efficiency or one -bedroom, and Two
(2) spaces for each two -bedroom unit or each three -bedroom
unit. In addition, one (1) space for every ten (10) units
designated for visitors.
Unit Type
Studio
One Bedroom
Two Bedroom
Three Bedroom
Mgr.'s Suite (28)
Subtotal
Visitors
Total
G:TMS�73646%11342%0220358.01
12/22/98
Number of Units
42
210
147
21
1
421
421/10
421
Parking
Required
42
210
294
42
2
589
43
632
25- 06i
P
Proposed: 650 parking spaces, inclusive of 13 spaces for the physically
disabled.
• OFFSTREET LOADING
Required: As required by Article IV, Supp. No. 3, Sec. 401, offstreet
loading requirements are the same as in the R-3 district.
In the R-3 district, for buildings in excess of 25,000 sq. ft. and
up to 500,000 sq. ft. of gross building area the number of
required berths shall be as follows:
One (1) berth (12W x 35L x 15HT) for every one hundred (100)
residential units or fraction thereof. And in addition, one (1)
berth (10W x 20L) for every thirty (30) residential units or
fraction thereof.
As per the zoning departments interpretation:
For 421 units,
400 units@1 berth/100 units=4 berths@12' wide x 35'
With 21 units remaining long x 15' high
21 units@lberth/30 units=.7=1 berth@10wide x 20'
long
Under a Class II, we may request a special permit to reduce
the size of the berths.
Proposed: 2 berths@ 12' wide x 35, long x 15' high
3 berths@ 10' wide x 20, long
• MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT:
Allowed: Unlimited
G ADMSM 64611134210220358.01
12/22/98
0 a
BRICKELL BAY VILLAGE
MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Zoning Ordinance No. 11000
1 • Section 1304.2.1 Application forms; supplementary materials
(a) ' Statement of ownership and control of the proposed development of activity.
The Disclosure of Ownership and Ownership Affidavit are provided in Article
1.
(b) Statement describing in detail the character and intended use of the
development of activity.
Brickell Bay Village is a rental apartment building located at 2101 - 2106
Brickell Avenue, Miami, Florida (the Property). The development consists
of a single parcel of land with a net area of 3.27 acres. The gross lot area
is 203,336 square feet or 4.668 acres.
The Property fronts Biscayne Bay to the east and Brickell Avenue to the
west. Its neighbors are the Atlantis to the north and Bristol Tower to the
south. Currently the site contains improvement in the forr,� of two four-story
rental apartment towers.
Brickell Bay Village will have 421 rental units. The Property will be a single
tower of 21 stories rising above a 6 level parking structure, and a ground
level with lobby, meeting rooms, rental office, and ancillary commercial and
small business center.
The Property will compliment the Brickell Avenue office and residential
districts and will contribute to the continuing development of the Downtown
Miami residential market. Residents of the Brickell Bay Village will contribute
expenditures to support retailing, restaurants, entertainment, utilization of the
Peoplemover System, enliven downtown after normal business hours and in
general, expand the quality of life in the Brickell Village area and Downtown
Miami.
The Property will have recreational amenities including a swimming pool, a
whirlpool spa and Bar-B-Que area, and landscaped areas for sunning, and
CI MMS M 6a 6'111342: 02203 5 & 01
12/22/99
e-I
CTII
e .
IF
relaxation . The Project calls for a fitness center with exercise room, lockers
and sanitary facilities, a business center,
meeting/partyretail space and multipurpose
rooms. The business center will not be open to the public. It
will contain meeting/conference rooms, office equipment such as computers,
printers, fax machine and copy machine.
Drawings showing the architectural character and location of the intended
use are included under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents.
A six story parking pedestal will provide 650 parking spaces. The roof of the
pedestal will house a recreation deck and jogging track.
(c) General location map, showing relation of the site or activity for which special
permit is sought to major streets, schools, existing utilities, shopping areas,
important physical features in and adjoining the project or activity and the
like.
The following exhibits are included with the Major Use Special Permit
Application and are located under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents.
i• Location Map: Map of the surrounding street system indicating the
Project location.
ii. Area Context Map: Map of the project area indicating buildings and
their functions that surround the site.
Aerial: Aerial photograph of the surrounding area indicating the
Project site.
(d) A site plan containing the title of the project and the names of the project
Planner and developer, date, and north arrow and , based on an exact
survey of the property drawn to a scale of sufficient size to show:
The Site plan is located as Sheet A. 1 under Tab 6 of the Supporting
g
i• Boundaries of the project, any existing streets, building, watercourses,
easements and section lines;
The boundaries of the project and the location of existing streets are
shown on the survey located under Tab 5 of the Supporting
Documents.
GIDMS173646111342102203 58.01
12/22/98
Exact location of all buildings and structures;
The exact location of all existing buildings located on the Property is
shown on the survey located under Tab 5 of the Supporting
Documents.
The location of the building to be constructed are shown on the Site
Plan, under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents.
iii. Access and traffic flow and how vehicular traffic will be separated from
pedestrian and other types of traffic;
A detailed analysis of the site access and traffic flow for the
development is provided in the Traffic Impact Analysis located under
Tab 2 of the Supporting Documents.
Vehicular access for residents, and visitors will occur via a drive -way
from Brickell Avenue. Valet parking for visitors will be available at the
front door. For residents of the Building, ingress and egress ramps,
to the parking areas will occur off the main entrance.
Service vehicles will access the Loading Docks on the south side of
the building.
iv. Off-street parking and off-street loading area,
Off-street parking will be provided within the six (6) level parking
garage. All levels will be accessed by the ramps located off the main
entrance driveway at the main entrance to the Building.
V. Recreational facilities locations;
Recreational facilities for the development are located on a
recreational deck which is on the top level of the parking pedestal and
at the bay front. Recreational facilities are shown under Tab 6 of the
Supporting Documents.
vi. Screens and buffers;
Landscaping and buffer areas are indicated on the Landscape Plan,
under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents.
GADh1SM646! 1134210220358.01
12J22/98 8
0'9— 0:)u,�,
vii. Refuse collections areas;
Waste collection will be provided by a containerized compactor
system located in the service area. These facilities are shown on the
Ground Floor Plan under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents.
VOL Access to utilities and points of utilities hookups.
Access and connections to site utilities are discussed in the Site Utility
Study located under Tab 3 of the Supporting Documents
(e) Tabulations of total gross acreage in the project and the percentages thereof
proposed to be devoted to the permitted uses and ground coverage.
203,336 gross square feet
4.66 gross acres
The various permitted uses.
Maximum permitted footprint 81,334 sq. ft.
Proposed:
Building Footprint: 44,902 gross square feet
ii. Ground coverage by structures.
Ground coverage by the structures are 22% of the total gross lot area.
(0 Tabulation showing:
The derivation of numbers of off street parking and off street loading
spaces shown in (d) above:
The minimum total number of off street parking spaces required and
the total number of spaces provided is as follows:
The minimum total number off street parking spaces required is 632.
The total number of spaces provided is 650. The off-street loading
areas shown on the ground Floor Plans of the Tower under Tab 6 of
the Supporting Documents provides 5 loading bays. Five loading bays
is the required amount under the Code. This application contains a
0ADMS17364611134=220358.01
12R2/98
. X!nft
request for a Class 11 Special Permit to change the required sizes of
the berths to four berths @ 12' wide x 35' long x 15' high and one
berth @ 10' wide x 20' long.
ii. Total project density in dwelling units per acre.
The Project contains a total of 421 Residential Rental Apartments and
3.27 net acres. The Residential project density per acre will be as
follows:
421 Units 3.27 Net Acres = 128 dwelling units per acre.
(g) If common facilities (such as recreation areas of structures, private streets,
common open space, etc.) are to be provided for the development,
statements as to how such common facilities are to be provided and
permanently maintained.
All common facilities provided for the Residential Tower will be maintained
by the Owner.
(h) Storm drainage and sanitary sewerage plans.
Storm drainage, water distribution, waste water and solid waste generation
provisions are discussed in the Site Utility Study located under Tab 3 of the
Supporting Documents.
(i) Architectural definitions for buildings in the development; exact number of
dwelling units, size, and types, together with typical floor plans of each type.
The ,number of dwelling units, sizes and types, together with typical floor
plans are included under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. The Retail
Areas are shown under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. The exact page
numbers are as follows:
The development will include 421 residential units. Typical floor plans for the
residential floors are included on shees A3.04, under Tab 6 of the Supporting
Documents. The retail areas are shown on sheet under Tab 6 of the
Supporting Documents.
0) Plans for signs, are included under Tab 6, as Sign A and Sign B.
G:0MS%73646U 1312%0220358.01
2I1✓98
m
0 It a
00— 06-1
A building identification sign will be located in the landscaped area at the
entrance on Brickell Avenue. All signs will be sized and styled in compliance
with the required regulations. Several Class I permits are being requested
as part of this application to satisfy the signage requirements.
(k) Landscaping plan, including types, sizes and locations of vegetation and
decorative shrubbery, and showing provisions for irrigation and future
maintenance.
The Landscaping Plan located on Sheet L-1 under Tab 6 of the Supporting
Documents, specify the plant types, sizes and locations, as well as
indications that all planted areas will be fully irrigated and maintained by the
Owner of the Residential project.
(I) Plans for recreation facilities, if any, including location and general
description of buildings for such use.
The parking pedestal has a recreational deck where recreational facilities are
provided along with a jogging track. Other amenities will be located at the
rear of the property at the bay front and will include a pool, a Jacuzzi, a
gazebo, a Bar-B-Que area and general sunning and recreation exercise
space is provided in the mezzanine level. A business center will be located
on the main floor past the lobby. The business center will not be open to the
public. It will contain meeting/conference rooms, office equipment such as
computers, printers, fax machine and copy machine.
(m) Such additional data, maps, plans, or statements as may be required for the
particular use or activity involved.
The Drawings submitted with this Application are located under Tab 6 of the
Supporting Documents.
(n) Such additional data as the applicant may believe is pertinent to the proper
consideration of the site and development plan.
Elevations and sections depicting the architectural character of the Tower
are included under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents.
2. Section 1702.2.1 General Report.
a. Property ownership or ownerships and beneficial interest within the
boundaries of the area proposed for Major Use Special Permit.
GAWSM646U 13421,0220359 01
12l2:J96 I I
r
Statement of Ownership and beneficial interest within the boundaries of the
area proposed for Major Use Special Permit are provided in Article 1.13 & C.
b. The nature of the unified interest or control.
The nature of unified interest or control is indicated in Article 1.
C. Survey of the proposed area showing property lines and ownership.
A copy of the survey of the Property is included under Tab 5 of the
Supporting Documents.
d. Map of existing features, including streets, alleys, easements, utilities lines,
existing land use, general topography, and physical features.
The existing site features and utility lines are shown on the survey of
Property located under Tab 5 and the Site Utility Study located under Tab 3
of the Supporting Documents. In addition, the surrounding street systems are
included under Tab 2, Traffic Impact Study and an aerial photograph of the
surrounding area indicating the project site is found under Tab 5, Page 2.
e. Materials to demonstrate the relationship of the elements listed in (d)
preceding to surrounding area characteristics.
The Drawings Submitted with this Application are located under Tab 6 of the
Supporting Documents.
Existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan designations for the area
on and around the lands proposed for Major Use Special Permit.
The existing zoning designation for the Property pursuant to City of Miami
Ordinance No. 11000, as Amended is R-4. The Zoning Atlas Map on page
37 indicates the existing and surrounding multifamily zoning. The
comprehensive plan future land use designation for the Property is "Multi-
family High Density Residential'. The zoning and comprehensive plan
designation are consistent with one another.
G:1DMS173646111342T _0358.01
11':J98 12
1 r,•p' V �� 1
0 0
3. Section 1702.2.2 Major Use Special Permit Concept Plan.
a. Relationships of the concept plan to surrounding existing and proposed
future uses. Activities, systems and facilities (transportation, recreation, view
corridors, pedestrian systems, services systems and similar uses).
Article II contains a written narrative of the Project outlining proposed uses,
activities and architectural character. This narrative also contains
descriptions of the Project's relationship to traffic, pedestrian movements„
and transportation access. Maps located on Tab 2f indicate the Project's
relationship to surrounding streets, land uses and functions. Building
elevations, sections and perspectives showing the proposed materials,
vertical profile and height, and orientation to streets is included in the
Drawings Submitted with this Application. The list of Drawings Submitted is
found under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents.
b. Existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan principles and
designations.
The Project conforms to the R-4 zoning for this Property. The comprehensive
plan future land use designation conforms with the land use designation
currently in effect for this Property.
Set back requirements under the Code are satisfied or superseded for the
proposed project. Five (5) off street loading areas are required under the
Code. Five (5) loading area are being provided.
4. ' Section 1702.2.3 Developmental Impact Study.
a. A traffic analysis shall be submitted for an area within approximately 1/4 mile
of the site, or an area including the major intersections to be impacted by the
site, whichever is larger.
The Traffic Impact Analysis is included under Tab 2 of the Supporting
Documents.
b. Economic impact data shall be provided, including estimates for construction
costs, construction employment, and permanent employment.
The Economic Impact Study is included under Tab 4 of the Supporting
Documents.
G:1Dh1S\73646X11342%0�20358 01
1?l12/98 13
} S
A
C. A housing impact assessment.
The Project will contain 421 Residential Apartment Units. The average rental
rates that are contemplated are approximately $900 per month for a studio
apartment, $1,220.00 for a one bedroom Apartment "and .$1,565.00 for a
two -bedroom Apartment.
d. A description of proposed energy conservation measures shall be provided,
including only those measures that are proposed in addition to the minimum
requirements in State Energy Code.
Architecturally, the building envelope will be comprised of insulated walls and
roof. Tinted glass will be used throughout the building.
Extensive use of wall shading by means of balconies will be implemented.
Electrically, all exterior and landscape lighting will be controlled by means of
time clocks and photocell switches. Energy saving lamps, ballasts and
fixtures are being considered in all common areas.
e. Historic buildings.
There are no historic structures located on the Property.
f. Environmental zone.
The Property is not located within an environmental preservation district.
GADMS%7364611134210220358.01
12_2/98 14
09 261
0
CITY OF MIAMI
CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
MEMORANDUM
TO: Walter J. Foeman, City
FROM: Alejandro Vilarello,
DATE: March 2, 2000
RE: Redlined Substi iginal for Resolution No. 99-961,
adopted Decembe 4, 1999 (Item #PZ-23) Brickell Bay Village Muse
Attached is an original redlined substitute Resolution (identified as "J-99-477RS"), to be attached
to Resolution No.99-961, adopted December 14, 1999, that you presently have as your official
record.
The document you have identified as Resolution No. 99-961 was included as Item #PZ-23 in the
Agenda Packet distributed prior to the December 14`h City Commission meeting. However, a
substitute resolution, with modifications, was to be distributed to the City Commission at the
December 14`h Meeting, but the distribution of the substituted document was not made. When the
item was discussed, the numbers and information set forth in the redlined substitute resolution
(attached) were the numbers and information considered by the City Commission, not the version
contained in the Agenda Packet. Consequently, the incorrect resolution distributed prior to the
meeting was executed by you, instead of the resolution actually discussed at the Meeting and
inclusive of the information in the resolution attached hereto.
I suggest that you include this redlined substitute original resolution (J-99-477RS) as part of your
official record as soon as it has been executed. I further request that you prepare an affidavit
identifying this substitute resolution (J-99-477RS) as the true Resolution No. 99-961 adopted by the
City Commission on December 14, 1999.
W415:BSS
Attachment
c: Joel E. Maxwell, Assistant City Attorney
G. Miriam Maer, Assistant City Attorney
Lourdes Slazyk, Assistant Director, Department of Planning
Teresita Fernandez, Chief, Office of Hearing Boards
Sylvia Lowman, Chief Deputy City Clerk
STATE OF FLORIDA )
COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE
CITY OF MIAMI
I, WALTER J. FOEMAN, City Clerk of the City of Miami, Florida, and
keeper of the records thereof, do hereby certify that the attached substitute original for
Resolution 99-961, revised Exhibit A, and original Exhibits B and C, said foregoing
pages numbered 1 through 32, inclusive, constitute a true and substitute original of a
Resolution and attachments passed and adopted by the City Commission at the meeting
held on the 14`h day of December, 1999.
SAID RESOLUTION WAS DESIGNATED RESOLUTION NO.99-961.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hereunto set my hands and impress the
Official Seal of the City of Miami, Florida, this 61h day of March, 2000.
WALTER J. FOEM V;
City Clerk
Miami, Florida
B
c
Clerk
(OFFICIAL SEAL)
ysars��
99-477
12 X9/99
RESOLUTION NO.
9 - 49611
A RESOLUTION OF THE MIAMI CITY COMMISSION,
WITH ATTACHMENT(S), APPROVING WITH CONDITIONS,
A MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT DEVELOPMENT ORDER
URSUANT TO ARTICLES 5, 13 AND 17 OF ZONING
DINANCE NO. 11000, FOR THE BRICKELL BAY
V LAGE PROJECT, TO BE LOCATED AT
APP OXIMATELY 2101-2105 BRICKELL AVENUE,
MIAM FLORIDA, TO BE COMPRISED OF NOT MORE
THAN 21 UNITS, WITH ACCESSORY RECREATIONAL
SPACE 632 PARKING SPACES; DIRECTING
TRANSMI AL OF THE HEREIN RESOLUTION; MAKING
FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATING CONCLUSIONS OF
LAW; PROV ING FOR BINDING EFFECT; CONTAINING
A SEVERABI ITY CLAUSE AND PROVIDING FOR AN
EFFECTIVE DA E.
WHEREAS, on March 5, 1999, Coral Way Investments, Inc.,
("APPLICANT"), submitted a mplete Application for Major Use
Special Permit for the Brickel Bay Village Project ("PROJECT")
pursuant to Articles 5, 9, 13 and 17 of Zoning Ordinance
No. 11000, the Zoning Ordinance of e City of Miami, Florida, as
amended ("Zoning Ordinance No. 11000" , for the property located
at approximately 2101-2105 Brickell .Av nue, Miami, Florida, as
legally described on Exhibit "B", at ched hereto and in
Exhibit "A", the Development Order attached I reto; and
WHEREAS, development of the PROJECT requi es the issuance of
a Major Use Special Permit Development Or r pursuant to
[Note: The original Resolution 99-961
was replaced by a substitute redline
original Resolution 99-961 and- C coyaUSSION
forwarded to the City Clerk's gTiAiG OF
Office on this 6th day of 1j � �; 6 u I It
6 .
March, 2000 per memorandum DE 1999
from the City Attorney]. ,a rid °�
dwj A A I iit� a Res°luh No.
__.._._
4 )
Article 17 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000; and
WHEREAS, the Large Scale Development Committee met on
N ember 12, 1998, to consider the proposed PROJECT and offer its
inpu and
WH EAS, the APPLICANT has modified the proposed PROJECT to
address t expressed technical concerns raised at said Large
Scale Develop ent Committee meeting; and
WHEREAS, a Urban Development Review Board met on
December 7, 1998, to consider the proposed PROJECT and
recommended approva of the PROJECT subject to complying with
staff requirements con erning the landscape plan as it pertained
to preservation of tr s along Brickell Avenue and other
perimeter landscape issues; nd
WHEREAS, the Miami Plann g Advisory Board, at its meeting
held on May 19, 1999, Item No. 1 following an advertised public
hearing, adopted Resolution No. P 21-99 by a vote of seven to
one (7-1), RECOMMENDING DENIAL of t Major Use Special Permit
Development Order as attached hereto; a
WHEREAS, the City Commission, notwithstanding the
recommendation of the Planning Advisory Board, deems it advisable
and in the best interest of the general welfar of the City of
Miami to issue a Major Use Special Permit Develo ent Order as
hereinafter set forth;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF 'HE CITY
OF MIAMI, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The recitals and findings contained in he
Preamble to this Resolution are hereby adopted by referenc
[Note: The original Resolution
99-961 was replaced by a
substitute redline original - 2 -
Resolution 99-961 and forwarded Cz:)P.
to the City Clerk's Office on this 6th
day of March, 2000 per memorandum from the City Attorney].
thereto and incorporated herein as if fully set forth in this
ection.
Section 2. A Major Use Special Permit Development Order,
atta ed hereto as Exhibit "A" and made a part hereof, is hereby
approve subject to the conditions specified in said Development
Order, per rticle 17 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, the Zoning
Ordinance of he City of Miami, Florida, as amended ("Zoning
Ordinance No. 1. 00"), for the Brickell Bay Village Project
("PROJECT") to be eveloped by Coral Way Investments, Inc.,
("APPLICANT"), at appro 'mately 2101-2105 Brickell Avenue, Miami,
Florida, more particular) described on Exhibit "B", attached
hereto and made a part hereof
Section 3. The PROJEC is hereby approved for the
construction of up to 421 resi ntial units, with accessory
recreational uses and 632 parking spa es.
Section 4. The Major Use Spec i 1 Permit Application for
the PROJECT also encompasses the lower ra ing Special Permits as
set forth in the Development Order, atta hed as Exhibit "All
hereto and incorporated herein.
Section 5. The findings of fact set
orth below are
hereby made with respect to the subject PROJECT:
a. The PROJECT is in conformity with the a
pted Miami
Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000, as mended.
b• The PROJECT is in accord with the R-4 Zoning
classifications of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000.
C. Pursuant to Section 1305 of the Zoning Ordina ce
No. 11000, the specific site plan aspects of t
[Note: The original Resolution
99-961 was replaced by a substitute
redline original Resolution 99-9613 -
and forwarded to the City Clerk's V�t•�:
Office on this 6th day of March, 2000
per memorandum from the City Attorney].
PROJECT, i.e., ingress and egress, parking, signs and
lighting, utilities, drainage, preservation of natural
features and control of potentially adverse effects
g nerally, have been considered and will be further
con 'dered administratively during the process of
issui a building permit and a certificate of
occupan r.
d. The PROJE is expected to cost approximately $88
million, and o employ approximately 224 workers during
construction ( 11 time employees); the PROJECT will
also result in the creation of approximately 10
permanent new job . The PROJECT will generate
approximately $5.4 mi ion annually in tax revenues to
local units of govern ent (of which approximately
$696,364 will go to the Ci of Miami) (1999 dollars).
e. The City Commission further 'nds that:
(1) the PROJECT will have a avorable impact on the
economy of the City of Miami,
(2) the PROJECT will efficie tly use public
transportation facilities;
(3) any potentially adverse effects the PROJECT
will be mitigated through complian e with the
conditions of this Major Use Special Pe it;
(4) the PROJECT will favorably affect the ed for
people to find adequate housing reas ably
[Note: The original Resolution 99-961
was replaced by a substitute redline
original Resolution 99-961 and forwarded
to the City Clerk's Office on this 6th day
of March, 2000, per memorandum from the
City Attorney].
- 4 -
e3 vY
accessible to their places of employment;
(5) the PROJECT' will efficiently use necessary public
facilities;
the PROJECT will not negatively impact the
environment and natural resources of the City;
(7) e PROJECT will not adversely affect living
co itions in the neighborhood;
(8) the ROJECT will not adversely affect public
safety;
(9) based on the record presented and evidence
presented, t public welfare will be served by
the PROJECT; an
(10) any potentially verse effects of the PROJECT
arising from safety nd security, fire protection
and life safety, solid waste, heritage
conservation, trees, shoreline development,
minority participation nd employment, and
minority contractor/subcont_ ctor participation
will be mitigated through c pliance with the
conditions of this Major Use Spec al Permit.
Section 6. The Major Use Special Permit, s approved and
amended, shall be binding upon the APPLICANT and a successors
in interest.
Section 7. The application for Major Use Specia Permit,
which was submitted on March 5, 1999, and on file wi h the
Department of Planning of the City of Miami, Florida, s.ha 1 be
[Note: The original Resolution 99-961
was replaced by a substitute redline
original Resolution 99-961 and forwarded
to the City Clerk's Office on this 6th
day of March, 2000, per - 5 - v
memorandum from the City Attorney]. 40
relied upon generally for administrative interpretations and is
ade a part hereof by reference.
Section 8. This Major Use Special Permit will expire two
(2) y rs from its effective date which is thirty (30) days after
the adop ion of the herein Resolution.
Secti 9. The City Manager is hereby directed to
instruct the 'rector of the Department of Planning to transmit a
copy of this esolution and attachment to the developers:
Osvaldo R. Orozco, Esquire, on behalf of Coral Way Investment,
Inc., 2500 First Un n Financial Center, 200 South Biscayne
Boulevard, Miami, Florid 33131-2336.
Section 10. The Fin ings of Fact and Conclusions of Law
are made with respect to e PROJECT as described in the
Development Order for the Brick e 1 Bay Village Project, which is
attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and made a part hereof by
reference, as more particularly desc 'bed in Exhibit "A".
Section 11. The Major Use Sp ial Permit Development
Order for the Brickell Bay Village Pra'ect (Exhibit "A") is
hereby granted and issued.
Section 12. In the event that any por 'on or section of
this Resolution or the Development Order (E ibit "A") is
determined to be invalid, illegal, or unconstitution 1 by a court
or agency of competent jurisdiction, such decision s all in no
manner affect the remaining portions of this Resol ion or
Development Order (Exhibit "A") which shall remain in full force
[Note: The original Resolution 99-961
was replaced by a substitute redline
original Resolution 99-961 and forwarded
to the City Clerk's Office on this 6th day
of March, 2000, per memorandum from the
City Attorney).
- 6 -
V" k _. C.
CJ ,j
effect.
ection 13. This Resolution shall become effective thirty
(30) da after its adoption.V
PASS
ATTEST:
ADOPTED this 1-4±jl_ day of December , 1999.
JOE CAROLLO, MAYOR
In accordance ith ik, rarn,i ^c,c c S :c. 2.36. since, iha l ay,,:',6,d nct ind:ca a approval of
this legislation b signing it in the designated place provided, said legislation now
becomes effective Nth the elapse of ten (10) days from the date of Commission action
regarding same, with t the Mayor exercising a veto.
WALTER J. FOEMAN
CITY CLERK
APPROVED
W3 4 91,4MM : hdb : BSS
EMBE 1" if! Fog
1 •
CORRECTNESS:t;
�i If the Mayor does not sign this Resolution, it shall \beomeeffective at the end of ten calendar days from the date passed and adopted. If the Mayor vetoes this Resolutishall become effective immediately upon override of the v
the City Commission.
[Note: The original Resolution
99-961 was replaced by a substitute
redline original Resolution 99-9 1
and forwarded to the City Clerk'
Office on this 6th day of March, 2000 -
per memorandum from the City Attorney).
0 xt
EXHIBIT "A"
ATTACHMENT TO
RESOLUTION NO.
DATE:
BRICKELL BAY VILLAGE PROJECT
MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT
DEVELOPMENT ORDER
Let it be known tha pursuant to Articles 5, 9, 13 and 17 of
Ordinance No. 11000, the ning Ordinance of the City of Miami,
Florida, as amended ("Zon g Ordinance No. 11000"), the
Commission of the City of Miam Florida, has considered in a
public hearing, the issuance of a Major Use Special Permit for
the Bri.ckell Bay Village Project (" OJECT") to be located at
approximately 2101-2105 Brickell Aven Miami., Florida; see
legal description on Exhibit "B", attached ereto and made a part
hereof; said legal description being subject o any dedications,
limitations, restrictions, reservations or ease nts of record.
After due consideration of the recommendations of the
Planning Advisory Board and after due consideration of the
consistency of this proposed development with the iami
Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan, the City Commission has appr ed
the PROJECT, and subject to the following conditions approves t e
Major Use Special Permit and hereby issues this Permit:
PR ECT DESCRIPTION:
he proposed Bay Village Project is a residential
develo ent to be located at approximately 2101-2105 Brickell
Avenue, iami, Florida. The PROJECT is located on a gross lot
area of a roximately 4.668 acres and a net lot area of
approximately .2713 acres of land (more specifically described
on Exhibit "B", corporated herein by reference). The remainder
of the PROJECT's V AL DATA is attached hereto as EXHIBIT "C",
and incorporated herei by reference.
The proposed PRO CT will consist of not more than
421 residential units in a single 21 story tower over a six (6)
level parking structure with ccessory recreational space and a
lobby consisting of the follow g accessory uses: multi -purpose
meeting/party rooms, rental offic ancillary retail space and a
small business center; said rec ational space includes a
swimming pool, a whirlpool spa, a Bar -Que area and landscaped
areas for sunning as well as a fitness ce ter with exercise room,
lockers and sanitary facilities. The PROJ T will also provide a
total of 632 parking spaces.
The ownership, operation and maintenance o common areas and
facilities will be by the property owner or (in e case of the
property being converted to condominiums) a mandat y property
owner association in perpetuity pursuant to a recorded
_ C~. 2 ,')
\clarationf Covenants and Restrictions.
or Use Special Permit Application for the PROJECT
sses, but is not exclusively limited to, the
er ranking Special Permits:
SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, for a Federal
Authority Clearance letter;
CLASS I SP CIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 906.6,
for active recreational facilities (including a
swimming pool)
CLASS I SPECIAL RMIT to permit staging and parking
during construction (to be approved prior to obtaining
a building permit fro the Department of Planning);
CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT for development signs when
combined with construction igns;
CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as er Article 15, Section
1511, for development between Biscayne Bay and the
first dedicated public right-of-w
CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 15 for
conformity of landscaping guides and st ndards;
CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 923,
for reduction in loading berth dimensions;
Waiver from the City Commission for the follow\cr:
1• Waterfront open spaces and setbacks as specs ied
on the plans on file; and
- 3 -
c; .� C,,
2. Provisions of the Noise Ordinance during the
required concrete pours for construction of the
building.
rsuant to Articles 13 and 17 of Zoning Ordinance
No. 110 approval of the requested Major Use Special Permit
shall be considered sufficient for the subordinate permits
requested a referenced above as well as any other special
approvals requ ed by the City of Miami which may be required to
carry out the req ested plans.
The PROJECT shal be constructed substantially in accordance
with plans and design hematics on file prepared by Wolfberg,
Alvarez & Partners, date February, 1999; the landscape plan
shall be implemented substan ially in accordance with plans and
design schematics on file pr ared by Laura Llerena, dated
February, 1999, said design and 1 dscape plans may be permitted
to be modified only to the extent n cessary to comply with the
conditions for approval imposed herein, all modifications shall
be subject to the review and approval o the Director of the
Department of Planning prior to the issua ce of any building
permits.
The PROJECT conforms to the requirements of t R-4 Zoning
District, as contained in Zoning Ordinance No. 11000.
The existing comprehensive plan future land use desiq\ation
4 -
V V
(0)
lows the proposed mix of commercial and residential uses.
THE %PLIANT, CITS SUCCESSORS, AND/OR ASSIGNS, JOINTLY OR
SEVERALLY,OR TO THE ISSUANCE OF ANY BUILDING PERMITS, SHALL
COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING:
1. Meet a\applicab
ble building codes, land
developmions, ordinances and other
laws.
2. Pay all ees due prior to the issuance
of a bui.
3. Allow the Miami Polic Department to conduct a
security survey, at the \a,
of said Department,
and to make recommendatoncerning security
measures and systems; fusubmit a report to
the Department of Plannito commencement
of construction, demong ow the Police
Department recommendatif a have been
incorporated into theCT s curity and
construction plans, or dte to t Director
of the Department nning w r such
recommendations are impr.
4. Provide a letter from the Department of Fi -
Rescue indicating APPLICANT'S coordination with
members of the Fire Plan Review Section at the
Department of Fire -Rescue in the review of the
scope of the PROJECT, owner responsibility,
building development process and review
procedures, as well as specific requirements for
fire protection and life safety systems, exiting,
- 5
-
t •' r10
.g
vehicular access and water supply.
Provide a letter of assurance from the Department
of Solid Waste that the PROJECT has addressed all
'111'\concerns of the said Department.
6. PreNorida,
Minority Participation and Employment
Plancluding a Contractor/Subcontractor
Parion Plan) to be submitted to the City of
Miarector of Equal Employment Opportunity
forand comments, with the understanding
thaAP ICANT must use its best efforts to
folCit of Miami's Minority/Women Business
Affd pro rement requirements as set forth
in s 18-13 through 18-146 of the Code of
thef Miami, or.ida, as amended.
7. Record the following in the Public Records of
Miami -Dade County, Flori (a) a Declaration of
Covenants and Restriction providing that the
ownership, operation and mai enance of all common
areas and facilities will be b the property owner
or a mandatory property owne association in
perpetuity; (b) a certified copy of the
Development Order specifying that t e Development
Order runs with the land and is bi ding on the
APPLICANT, its successors, and assigns, jointly or
severally.
8. Demonstrate to the City of Miami that the OJECT
has either: (a) completed its condo 'nium
requirements and has been approved for such by the
State of Florida; or (b) provide the City of Mia i
with an executed, recordable unity of title o
covenant in -lieu of unity of title agreement for
6 - 00_.. v
the subject property, subject to the review by,
and in a form acceptable to, the City Attorney.
9• rovide the Department of Public Works with plans
r proposed sidewalk and swale area improvements
fo their review and a roval pp prior to the
issu nce of a building permit.
10. Provide the Department of
Planning with a
temporar parking plan
which addresses
constructi n employee parking during the
constructio period; said plan shall be subject to
the review d approval by the Department of
Planning prior to the issuance of any building
permits.
11. Pursuant to Article
Section 914 (and the zoning
write-up attached her o), the developer shall pay
$583,184.78 to the C1 y of Miami's Affordable
Housing Trust Fund as
87,434 square feet of addi ionalcontribution
boor area ratio
(F•A•R.) being requested.
12. As may be requested by the D\artments of Fire -
Rescue and General Services ration, the
roof area of the proposed struavailable at no charge to theall be made
any necessary communications eqf Miami for
ipme
13. The APPLICANT shall retain the servi\en
Of an
archeological consultant who will be rle
for conducting archeological monitoril
ground disturbing activity as welle
subsequent recovery of artifacts. Said t
shall work at the direction of the P
7 -
N
0
County Archeologist and shall provide reports to
both that office and to the City of Miami.
14.\regarding
CANT shall submit a final revised
plan with all specifications for the
approval of the Department of Planning
he issuance of a building permit; said
address the concerns of the Department
g and the Urban Development Review Board
rickell Avenue.
15. The APPLICAN shall comply with theconditions of
the Miami -Da e Shoreline Development Review
Committee Resol ion No. 99-SDRC-2.
THE CITY OF MIAMI SHALL:
Establish the effective da e of this Permit as being
thirty (30) days from the date of its issuance with the
issuance date constituting th commencement of the
thirty (30) day period to appeal f om the provisions of
the Permit.
CON LU,gTONS OF T,AW
The Brickell Bay Village Project, propose by Coral Way
Investments, Inc., ("APPLICANT"), complies wit the Miami
Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000, is consist t with the
orderly development and goals of the City of Miami, an complies
with local land development regulations and further, purl nt to
Section 1703 of Zoning Ordinance No. 1.1000:
- 8 -
(a 0
(1) the PROJECT will have a favorable impact on the economy
of the City of Miami; and
the PROJECT will efficiently use public transportation
facilities; and
(3) t e PROJECT will favorably affect the need for people
to ind adequate housing reasonably accessible to their
place of employment; and
(4) the PRO�T will efficiently use necessary public
facilities, and
(5) the PROJECT wi 1 not negatively impact the environment
and natural reso ces of the City of Miami; and
(6) the PROJECT will not adversely affect public safety;
and \
(7) the public welfare will be '�krved by the PROJECT; and
(8) any potentially adverse effects o.f the PROJECT will be
mitigated through conditions of is Major Use Special
Permit.
The proposed development does not unreasonably i terfere with the
achievement of the objectives of the adopte State Land
Development Plan applicable to the City of Miami.
Pursuant to Section 1305 of Zoning Ordinance No. 1000, the
specific site plan aspects of the PROJECT i.e., ing ess and
egress, offstreet parking and loading, refuse and service reas,
signs and lighting, utilities, drainage and control of
potentially adverse effects generally have been considered nd
9 _
4) 0
wi be further considered administratively during the process of
issue. g individual building permits and certificates of
- 10 -
fa
vv
TO:
FROM
C7
Q PZ-23
CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA
INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM
Honorable Mayor and Members
of the Commission
onald ars
City Manager
RECOAU ENDATION
DATE: JUN 15 IM FILE:
Request for MUSP for Brickell
SUBJECT: Bay Village Project proposed at
2101-2105 Brickell Avenue
REFERENCES :City Commission Meeting:
ENCLOSURES: June 22,1999
It is respectfully recommended that the City Commission approve the attached request for
a Major Use Special Permit for the proposed Brickell Bay Village Project to be located at
2101-2105 Brickell Avenue, with the conditions specified on the attached Development
Order.
BACKGROUND
The attached request is for a Major Use Special Permit for the Brickell Bay Village
Project to be located at 2101-2105 Brickell Avenue. The project is proposed to consist of
a 421 unit apartment building with accessory recreational uses and 632 parking spaces.
The Planning Advisory Board, at its hearing held on May 19, 1999 recommended denial
of the proposed project due to their concerns that the project was not in keeping with the
established character of this particular section of the Brickell Avenue corridor (from 15`h
Street to approximately 25`b Street). The Board felt that the project was too dense and
that the proposed parking garage was out of character with the area due to the fact that
there are no other garages in this area of this height.
The Planning Department has reviewed the concerns of the Planning Advisory Board and
suggests that, if the City Commission were to be of a mind to approve this project,
perhaps additional conditions could be imposed which respond to the concerns of the
Planning Advisory Board.
Additional conditions which address the design issues raised could include such details as
requiring that the parking be reconfigured on the property in a manner that it would not
exceed two (2) levels in height (this may mean a reduction in the number of units).
99- 961
t
Another condition could specify that the building itself be reconfigured in a w-ay that
would "slim" the massing; this would be acceptable because the planning
ory
Board was less(Foncenwd-u th the proposed height of the building than wzth the massing.
Additional conditions related to awletics could be addressed by recommending that the
materials and/or colors of the building be enhanced for a more consistent appearance
wid& the surrounding area.
DHK.MB/A LYS
171
. '`
4
0 961
PLANNING FACT SWEET
APPLICANT Ms. Vicky Garcia -Toledo, Esq.
HEARING DATE May 19, 1999.
REQUEST/LOCATION Consideration of a Major Use Special Permit for the Brickell Bay
Village Apartments Project located at approximately 2101-2105
Brickell Avenue.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION Complete legal description on file with the Hearing Boards Office.
PETITION Consideration of approving pprovin a Major Use Special Permit for the
Brickell Bay Village Apartments Project located at approximately
2101-2105 Brickell Avenue in order to allow a residential
Planned Unit Development consisting of 421 units with 632
parking spaces and accessory recreational uses.
PLANNING Approval with conditions.
RECOMMENDATION
BACKGROUND AND Please see attached analysis.
ANALYSIS
PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD Denial
VOTE: 7-1
CITY COMMISSION Continued from CC of November 16, 1999.
APPLICATION NUMBER 99-011
.....................:.- ...-.-:.: Item #1
. ........................
f.
:................................
CITY OF MIAMI PLANNING DEPARTMENT
444 SW 2N0 AVENUE. 3RO FLOOR • MIAMI, FLORIDA. 33130
PHONE (305) 416-1400
Date: 06/14/99.................................................................
P
....................................................................................................1 ..:
nn age
-1 01011-1 -
7
4
ANAL..YSIS FOR MAJOR USE SPECIAL, PERMIT
Brickell Bay Village
CASE NO: 99-011
The requested Major Use Special Permit is for the purpose of allowing a Residential
Planned Unit Development project consisting of 421 units and accessory recreational uses
with 632 parking spaces for the property located at approximately 2101-2105 Brickell
Avenue within the Coral Way NET Area.
This Major Use Special Permit also encompasses the following lower ranking permits:
CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, for a Federal Aviation Authority
Clearance letter;
CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 906.6 for active
recreational facilities (including a swimming pool);
CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT to permit staging and parking during construction
(to be approved prior to obtaining a building permit from PIanning);
CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT for Development Signs when combined with
construction signs;
CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 15, Section 1511 for development
between Biscayne Bay and the first dedicated public right-of-way;
CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 15 for conformity of landscaping
guides and standards;
CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 923 for reduction in
loading berth dimensions;
Waiver from the City Commission for the following:
1- Waterfront open spaces and setbacks as specified on the plans on file; and
2. Noise Ordinance during the required concrete pours for construction of the
building.
Pursuant to Articles 13 and 17 of Zoning Ordinance I1000, approval of the
requested Major Use Special Permit shall be considered sufficient for the subordinate
Permits requested and referenced above as well as any other special approvals required by
the City .yyhich,may be required to carry out the requested plans..
�
In determining the appropriateness of the proposed residential project, the Planning
Department has referred this project to the Large Scale Development Committee
(LSDC), the City of Miami Preservation Officer, the Urban Development Review
Board (UDRB) and the Miami -Dade County Shoreline Development Review
Committee for additional input and recommendations; the following findings have
been made:
• It is found that the proposed residential development project will benefit the City by
creating new housing opportunities for residents and employees of the area.
It is found that the project was reviewed by the Large Scale Development Committee
on November 12, 1998 and has modified the proposed project to address the
expressed technical concerns raised at said Large Scale Development Committee
meeting; however, additional design details related to sidewalk and swaie area
improvements will have to be submitted at the time of permitting.
• It is found that the applicant should submit a parking plan for construction employees
while the new building is under construction; said parking plan shall be subject to the
review and approval by the Planning Department prior to the issuance of any building
permits.
• It is found that the project was reviewed and approved (with conditions) by the
Miami -Dade Shoreline Development Review Committee on January 28, 1999 under
Resolution 99-SDRC-2 (see attached).
• It is found that the UDRB has recommended approval of the proposed project
pursuant to a public meeting held on December 7, 1998 subject to complying with
staff requirements concerning the landscape plan as it pertained to preservation of
trees along Brickell Avenue and other perimeter landscape issues.
• It is found that per the Fire and GSA Departments of the City, the roof of the
proposed structure may be required for communications equipment to serve the City;
this are should be made available for said use at no charge to the City.
• It is found that the project was referred to the Dade County Archeologist and that
Pursuant to his comments the City of Miami Preservation Officer has made a
recommendation that archeological monitoring be conducted in the manner set forth
in the condition described below.
• It is found that pursuant to Article 9, Section 914 (and the zoning write-up attached
hereto) the developer shall pay $583,184.78 into the City's Affordable Housing Trust
Fund as a contribution for the 87,434 square feet of additional F.A.R. being
requested.-. t,
qJ9� V1)1
• It is found that with respect to all additional criteria as specified in Section 1305 of
Zoning Ordinance 11000, the proposal has been reviewed and found to be adequate.
Based on these findings, the Planning Department is recommending approval of the
requested Residential Planned Unit Development Project with the following
conditions:
1. The approval of this Major Use Special Permit shall be subject to the
recordation of the following documents prior to the issuance of any building
permits for the proposed project:
a. Unity of Title or covenant in lieu thereof providing that the ownership,
operation and maintenance of all common areas and facilities will be by
the property owner or a mandatory property owner association in
perpetuity or completion of the State of Florida condominium process
which assures the same compliance.
b. Development Order specifying that the Development Order runs with the
land and is binding on the Applicant, it successors and assigns, jointly or
severally.
2. Pursuant to the Department of Public Works, the property requires plans for
proposed sidewalk and swale area improvements prior to the issuance of a
building permit.
3. Pursuant to Article 9, Section 914 (and the zoning write-up attached hereto) the
developer shall pay S583,184.78 into the City's Affordable Housing Trust Fund
as a contribution for the 87,434 square feet of additional F.A.R. being requested.
4. Pursuant to the Fire and GSA Departments, the roof area of the proposed
structure shall be made available to the City of Miami for any necessary
communications equipment at no charge to the City.
5. Submittal of a parking plan for construction employees while the new building
is under construction; said parking plan shall be subject to review and approval
by the Planning Department prior to the issuance of any building permits.
b. The applicant shall retain the services of an archeological consultant who will be
responsible for conducting archeological monitoring of all ground disturbing
activity as well as the subsequent recovery of artifacts. Said consultant shall
work at the direction of the Dade County Archeologist and shall provide reports
to both that office and to the City.
0 p-
7. The $PPli�nt shall s -
for the review and a ubmit a final revised landsca
PProval of the Planning Department
plan with all specifications
a building Permit; said g P rtment Prior to the issuance of
Department and the UDRH regarding shall address the concerns of the Planning
�garding Bric&ell Avenue.
S• The applicant shall comply
with Development Review Committee Resolution No. 99.SDRC.2. the conditions of the Miami -Dade Shoreline
9• This approval shall also be subject to all additional conditions
attached Development Order. ns as specified in the
r..
4
2101 Brickell Avenue
(R-4)
M.U.S.P.
MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT, as per City of Miami amended, Article 17, Section I701 1 to Zoning Ordinance 11000, as
( )� permit a residential development of 421 units.
MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT as
per City of amended, to permit a development with over 000 parkin Miami Zoning
� �� 11000, as
g spaces.
MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT as per City of Miami Zoning Ordinance 1I000, as
amended, to permit an increased in Floor Area Ratio development bonus. Article 9 Sec
914. (87,434 square feet X $6.67 = $583,184.78). hon
MAJOR USE SPEC
IAL PERMIT, as per City of Miami Zoning
amended, to permit a Planned Unit Development Ordinance 11000, as
P (Article 5, Section 500).
The Major Use Special Permit encompasses the following special
. permits:
Waiver from the CityCommission
1. From the waterfront pen spaces and setbacks. �g
2. From the noise ordinance during the required concrete pours for construction
biding. of the
• Class I Special Permit for Aviation Hazards.
• Class 11 Special Permit for conformity of landsca in
• Class II Special Permit for development between Biscayne Bastany and the first
g and
dedicated public right-of-way. (Article 15, Section 1511). • Class II Special Permit for reduction in the above dimension of three loading be
Article 9, Section 923). g tths.
• Class I Special Permit for active recreational facilities
• Class I Special Permit to permit staging and
approved prior to obtaining buildingparking dig construction to be
• Class I Special Permit for Development °m planning.
signs. Signs when combined with construction
ce Phee,
Zoning Inspect6r 11
1. r
Date
V9- D61
RESOLUTION PAD -21-99
A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING DENIAL OF A MAJOR USE SPECIAL
PERMIT FOR THE BRICKELL BAY VILLAGE PROJECT LOCATED AT
APPROXIMATELY 2101-2105 BRICKELL AVENUE IN ORDER TO ALLOW
A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONSISTING OF 421
UNITS WITH 632 PARKING SPACES AND ACCESSORY RECREATIONAL
USES.
HEARING DATE: May 19, 1999
ITEM NO. 1
VOTE: 7-1
ATTEST.
Geert-Sanchez, Director
Planning Department
S9- 561
7- 'dt MAN
'k cz5
... . ,1$v+£f0+14M+4f:,c+v . ..sw.-(-lm.;3±.if*P^+rto.M,u•..,,....a:r,.+mox` ., :'�4�wM.uu"%is':' n �4c.a-.uY:7:,�•S-r�m,..,,:,� xF 5+f'i '
e `
' � C
,• ,f a �•s+' ••0 .• c��{ °t G� t�QS -
eso
•+ • ° . p
�o L
41
• G
.,fib , ,' S „ \ :• " \ }�aa�4�'a,
/� •. �`� \ � \ r vim' � e'�
r \`f, is '\•� �z +�„
,,� � g •'' a •„ • � . �� \G GF,J }it "s�x{>
'` • to , . •• t, :� "� �'���, \ \\ G� P > ."��a �
•� ', • t Y �.\` ••tit•: � .. � • P l .� �'
` �: • /• V is '' � Q L.o Y;}••••ti ��.',. e�esizr t.a
N qj
OP
\ d ; : mo sF
• `� 7� qG 'ems •', ,. / - � '
i
Tea.: (305) 856 3733
Osvaldo R. Orozco. P.A.
Attorney at Law
122 Minorca Avenue
Coral Gables, Florida 33145
Fax: (305) 856 4342
March 31, 1999
A. Vicky Garcia -Toledo, Esq.
Bilzin Sumberg Dunn Price & Axelrod LLP
2500 First Union Financial Center
Miami, Florida 33131
Major Use Special Permit (°Permit") . 2101 - 2105 Brickell Avenue,
Miami, Florida.
Dear Ms. Garcia -Toledo:
This shall serve to confirm that your firm is authorized to act as our zoning
counsel in connection with obtaining the Permit. This authorization is limited to that
Purpose exclusively. Subsequent written authorizations wiil be required for matters
exceeding the scope of applying for and seeking final approval of the Permit.
As Is understood between the parties and set forth in their contract, all legal
fees, application fees and costs incurred in connection with that application shall be
paid by the buyer.
Feel free to call if you have any questions.
via hand dellven�
Sincerely,
vsvaldo R. Orozco, P.A.
for Coral Way Investments, Inc.
S9 Hi
CITY OF MIAM I
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
APPLICATION FOR
MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT
IT IS INTENDED THAT MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMITS BE REQUIRED WHERE SPECIFIED USES AND/OR OCCUPANCIES INVOLVE MATTHRS
DEEMED TO BE OF CITYWIDE OR AREA -WIDE IMPORTANCE.
THE CITY COMMISSION SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR DETERMINATIONS ON APPLICATIONS FOR MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMMITS.
(SEEAR77CLE 1E OF ORDINANCE 11000. ASAM1rVDED, 7NEZONING ORDINANCE oFTHzcnYoi.w .ttz FLORIDA.)
THE CITY COMMISSION SHALL REFER ALL APPLICATIONS FOR MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMITS TO THE PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD AND
TO THE DIRECTOR OF THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT FOR RECOMMENDATIONS, AND MAY MAKE REFERRALS TO
AGENCIES. BODIES. OR OFFICERS. ETTM THROUGH THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT OR DIRECTLY. FOR REVIEW,
ANALYSIS AND/OR TECHNICAL FINDINGS AND DETERMINATIONS AND REPORTS THEREON. (SEE SECTION 1301.5 OF ORDINANCE /]MO. AS
AMENDED. M ZO,VING ORDLVAA'CE OF77YE C17YOFAIUM.. FLORIDAJ
SECTION 2.653 OF THE CODE OF THE CrrY OF MIAM. FLORIDA. AS AMMENDED. GENERALLY REQUMES ANY PERSON WHO RECEIVES
COMPENSATION. REMUNERATION OR EJG'ENSES FOR CONDUCTING LOBBYING ACTIViM TO REGISTER AS A LOBBYIST WITH THE CITY
CLERK PRIOR TO ENGAGING IN LOBBYING ACTIVTM BEFORE CITY STAFF. BOARDS, COMMrrrM AND THE CITY COMMSSION. A
COPY OF SAID ORDINANCE 5 AVAILABLE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK (MIAMI CITY HALL). LOCATED AT 3500 PAN AMERICAN
DRIVE, M1AMI, FLORIDA.33133.
NOTE.• THIS APPLICATION MAST BE TYPEWRITTENAND SIGNED IV BLACK IArK.
1, Coral Way Investments, Inc. , hereby apply to the Director of the Department of PIanning
and Development of the City of Miami for approval of a Major Use Special Permit under the provisions of Article 17
of the City of Miami Zoning Ordinance.
Property Address:
2101 - 2106 Brickell Avenue
Nature of proposed use (be specific): See Addendum to Application Note 1 , attached
hereto and made part hereof.
APPLICATIOIN MATERIALS
I attach the following in support and explanation of the application:
12
U
1: Two original surveys, prepared by a State of Florida Registered Land Surveyor within one year from the
date of application.
2. Affidavit disQlpyn�=. ownership of property covered by application and disclosure of interest form (attach
forms 4-83 and 46-33 to applicatio+n).
F
{
r
09- 90
APPLICATION NIATLRIALS 7Continued>
I attach the following in support and explanation of the application:
Li 3. Certified list of owners of real estate within a 375-foot radius from the outside boundaries of prop
(attach form 6-83 to application).
4. Maps or the:
a) Existing zoning designation.
b) Adopted comprehensive plan designation for arm on and around the property.
M S. General location map showing relation to the site -or activity to major streets, schools, existing utilities,
shopping areas, important physical features in and adjoining the project, and the like.
M 6. Concept Plan
a) Site plan and relevant information per Section 1304Z.Id•h.
b) Relationships to surrounding e.cisdog and proposed futures uses and activities, systems and facilities,
per Section 17023Za.
c) How concept affects existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan principles and designations;
tabulation of any required variances,, special permits, changes of zoning or exemptions, per Section
1702.3.2b. —
Cl 7. Developmental Impact Study (an application for development approval for a Development of Regional
Impact may substitute).
® E. Other (be specific): See Addendum to Application Note 2 attached
hereto and made a part hereof
® 9. Fee of S 3 0 , 0 0 0.0 0. for the Major Use Special pedal Permit, based on current fee schedule as set forth in `.
Chapter 62 of the Code of the City of Miami, as amended
A 10. Additional fee of S }
. for pay required special permit4. clean �f zoning or variances set
forth in chapter 62 of the Code of the City of Miami, as amended.°
• 4
Total Fee: S {
Signature
NameR
Address `�" 3 / / 5 • �,{%. % f'%fit M ii
Phone/Fax
Date 3 / /e7 g
FINAL APPROVAL OF TIIL4 APPLICATION FOR %I.VOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT SHALL CONSIST OF AN EXECUTED RESOLUTION BY THE
MIAMI CITY COM,MISSION.AND.AN DEVELOPMENT ORDER ATTACHED THERETO WHICII SPECIFIES.IIE CONDMON.S UNDER WHICII TH18
IAJOR USE SPECIAL PER -MIT APPLJCATION 'IS APPROVED. IF APPROVED BY THE CITY COh4M1.1tilON. SAID RESOLUTION ANI
�)I:ViEI.()I'.�IItN'f ORDER SHALL. UPON f:X[CIMON TFIEREOI-'. BE TRANS.MrITED TO TllE. OWNER OR AUTIIORILI:D AGENT AT THE `
ADDRIcSS SpE(:IFIED ABOVE.
O
a
Note 1
Note 2
BR.ICKELL BAY VILLAGE
ADDENDUM TO APPLICATION FOR
MAJOR. USE SPECIAL PERMIT
Request for Major Use Special Permits For:
a) To develop a 421 unit high-rise rental apartment building.
b) To construct a parking structure containing 632 spaces.
c) To construct a Planned Unit Development allowing for an increase in floor
area ratio to up to twenty percent (20yo) over the allowed by the underlying
District.
d) To obtain a twenty-five (255/o) bonus through contribution to Affordable
Housing Trust.
The above Major Use Special Permits are to encompass the lower ranking
Special permits requested below:
a) To apply for a Class lI permit for a waiver of certain requirements of the City
of Miami's, off street parking guides and standards.
b) To apply for a Class H permit for new construction between the bay and the
first public right of way.
c) To apply for a Class I permit to permit permanent recreation facilities.
d) To apply for a Class II permit to permit a restaurant as per Section 906.7.
e) To apply for a Class II permit for reduction of loading berths.
f) To apply for a Class II permit for conformity of landscaping and standard.
g) To apply for a Class I permit to permit the staging and parking during
construction.
h) To apply for a Class I permit to allow development/construction/rental
signage.
i) To request a waiver from the City Commission:
29- 561
p p-
i) from the waterfront open spaces and setbacks.
from the noise ordinance during the required concrete pours for
construction of the building.
D To apply for a Certificate of Appropriateness for ground disturbing activities.
k) To apply for a Class I permit for aviation hazard
I) To apply for all other lesser permits as may be required to allow development
and construction of this project as contemplated under this Major Use Special
Permit application as submitted and per plans on ,file.
09- 561
AFFIDAVIT
STATE OF FLORIDA }
)SS
COUNTY OF
MIAMI-DADS }
Before me, the undersigned authority, this day personally appeared Coral Way Investments, Inc
who being by me first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and says:
L That he/she is the owner, or the legal representative of the owner, submitting the accompanyingapplication
a public hearing as required by the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, PP °n for
daaffecting the real property located
in the City of Miami, as described and listed on the pages attached to this affidavit and made a part thereof.
2. That all owners which he/she represents, if any, have given their full and complete permission for him/her
to
in his/her behalf for the change or modification of a classification or regulation of zoning as set out in the act
accompanying petition.
3. That the pages attached hereto and made a part of this affidavit contain the current names, mailing ad
telephone numbers and legal descriptions for the real Property dresses,
p perty of which he/she is the owner or legal representative.
4. The facts as represented in the application and documents submitted in conjun 'o with this affidavit are true
and correct.
Further Affiant sayeth not.
STATE OF FLORIDA Applicant's .
tore 7 /
COUNTY OF MIAbQ-DARE
The foregoing in ent was acknowledged
14 �yy /by �g before me this 1 day of��,1�
uoduced /v a partnership. He/She - partner (or agent) on behalf of
personally known to me or who has
as identification and w id (did not) take an oath.
Notary Public -State of Florida
Commission No.:
My Commission Expirl
r
X_Y Alca 1 Sal
My Commg7-on CC599689
s� t EIP902 November 7 2 ! r r
OF F01:
r4 yy a
r
Owner's Name
Mailing Address
Telephone Number
Legal Description:
Owner's
Mailing Address
Telephone Number
Legal Description:
Owner's Name
Mailing Address
Telephone Number
Legal Description:
Any. other real estate property owned individually, jointly, or severally y b corporation, artnershi
or privately) within 375 feet of the subject site is listed as follows: ' p p
Street Address
Not a livable
---------------
Street Address
Not a fi bl
Street Address
N4+ aoo(icable
O;OMS17364611134210220358.01
I zw./g8
Legal Description
Legal Description
Legal Description
DISCLOSURE OF OVVNEgSga,
1. Legal description and street address of subject real property:
2101 - 2105 Brickell Avenue, Miami, Florida
Folio Number 01-4139-001-2500 and 01-4139-001-2510
2. Owner(s) of subject real property and percentage of ownership. Note: Section 2-618 of the Code o
Miami requires disclosure of all parties having a financial inte f the City of
Presentation, request or rose, either direct or indirect, in the subject matter of:
petition a the City Commission. Accordingly, question #2 requires disclosure of
shareholders of corporations, beneficiaries of trusts, and/or any other interested parties, together with
and Proportionate interest, their addresse
See Attached. '
3. Legal description and street address of any real
(b) located within 375 feet of the subject real propeprorty. (a) owned by any Party -listed in answer to question #2, and
Not Applicable.
STATE OF FLORiDA
COUNTY OF MIAMI DADS
Owner or Attorney for Owner / /
The foregoing ins r t was acknowledged before me this
19�Ig.by /l Z!
day of
partner (or agent) on behalf of
produced a Partnership. He/She is personally known to me or who has
as identification
who did (did not) take an oath_
C
e:
Notary Public -State of Florida
Commission No.:
My Commission Expires:
I sanew
MY Commrs3cm CC599M
Eapses Novemom 7 20M
�fFCf Fi��`o
f..
1. t
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Lot 65 and 66, Block B of FLAGLER SUBDIVISION according to the Plat thereof as
recorded in Plat Book 5, at Page 44 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida,
together with a portion of Bay Bottom lying Southeasterly of and adjacent to said lots 65
and 66. All being more particularly described as follows:
Begin at the most Northerly comer of the aforesaid lot 65; thence run S.52°-50'-14" W.,
along the Northwesterly line of said lots 65 and 66, for 200.00 feet; Thence run S.37°-09'
46" E., along the Southwesterly boundary of said lot 66 and its Southeasterly prolongation,
for 732.65 feet to an intersection with the established Bulkhead line, according to the Plat
thereof as recorded in Plat Book 74, at Page 3 of the Public Records of Dade County,
Florida; Thence run N.41 26-30" E., along said Bulkhead line for 203.98 feet to an
intersection with the Southeasterly prolongation of the Northeasterly boundary line of said
lot 65; Thence run N.370-09'-46" W., along the Northeasterly line of said lot 66 and its
Southeasterly prolongation for 692.34 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said described
parcel of land containing 142,482.04 Sq. Ft. (3.271 Acres +/-)
also known as
All of Lots 65 and 66, Block "B", FLAGLER SUBDIVISION, as recorded in Plat Book 5,
Page 44, Public Records of Dade County, Florida, and the following described parcel of
land:
Commencing at the Southwesterly comer of said Lot 66, thence run South 37 degrees 9
minutes 46 seconds East for a distance of 183.97 feet to a point. Said point also being on
the Dade County Bulkhead line; thence ran North 41 degrees 26 minutes 30 seconds East
along said Bulkhead line to a distance of 203.98 feet to a point; thence run North 37
degrees 9 minutes 26 seconds West a distance of 197.75 feet, said point also being the
Southeasterly comer of Lot 65; thence Southwesterly meandering along the high-water line
of Biscayne Bay a distance of 202 feet more or less to the point of beginning.
G:10MS17364611134210220042.01
12118/98
1. r
(J- 06i
DISCLOSURE OF OWNERSHIP ADDENDUM
Owner. Coral Way Investment, Inc.,
a Florida corporation
Owned: 100% by Coral Way Holding,
Inc., a Barbados corporation
Shareholders: Name
Number
Ricardo Chiari R.
of Shares
5,000
50.00%
Raul Arango G.
Carmen Chiari de Arango
1,000
1,000
10.00%
Gilberto Guardia F.
500
10.00%
Teresita G. de P. de Guardia
500
5.00%
5.00%
Carlos A. Arias Ch.
Mary M. de Arias
70
0.70%
Carlos E. de le Guardia
350
420
3.50%
Daira A. de Jimenez
420
4.20%
4.20%
Ofelina A. de Chapman
420
4.20%
Idarela Arias de Alvarez
107
1.07%
Fernando Arias Chiari
107
1.07%
Emanuel Arias Chiari
Total outsatanding
10,000
100.00%
Under Purchase/Sale Contract to:
Point Development Corporation 100%
Point Development Corporation, a Florida corporation, is owned by:
BCOM Property Corporation
JNA Holdings, Inc.
50%
50%
BCOM Property Corporation, a Florida corporation, is owned by:
Michael Baumann
Phyllis Baumann
90.0%
Terry J. Franzen
2.5%
Richard Van Buskirk
5.0%
2.5%
JNA Holdings, Inc., a Florida Corporation, is owned by:
Aslan Palachi & Lillian Palachi, his wife 50%
Jeff Palachi 50%
S 561
H
Owner/Development:
Architect•
Landscape Architect. -
Traffic:
Economist:
Legal:
GADMS17364611 I34210220358.01
12/22/98
BRICKELL SAY VILLAGE
DIRECTORY OF PROJECT PRINCIPALS
Point Development Corporation
1110 Brickell Avenue
Suite 303
Miami, Florida 33131
Telephone: (305) 375-0900
Fax: (305) 375-6183
Contact person: Asian Palachi
Wolfberg Alvarez & Partners
5960 S.W. 57 Avenue
Miami, Florida 33143
Telephone: (305) 666.5474
Fax: (305) 6664994
Mr. David Wolfberg
Principal
Mr. Aris Garcia
Project Architect
Laura Llerena
6401 SW 87th Avenue
Miami, Florida
Telephone: (305) 279-1651
Fax (305)
Post, Buckley, Schuh & Jernigan, Inc.
200 Northwest 107th Avenue
Miami, Florida 33172
Telephone: (305)
Fax: (305)
Mr. Jeff Easly, P. E.
Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P. A.
One Southeast Third Avenue
Suite 2100
Miami, Florida 33131
Telephone (305) 374-1574
Fax: (305) 372-8161
Mr. Darryl K Sharpton
Bilzin Sumberg Dunn Price & Axelrod
2500 First Union Financial Center
200 South Biscayne Boulevard
Miami, Florida 33131-2336
Telephone: (305) 374-7580
Fax: (305) 374-7593
A. Vicky Garcia -Toledo, Esc,.
99- 961
P4GE 03
- ,•.,=��zw+a�na�"�uxrt�; vs*'�+:+.tff?N'+3t�Srawtw•��u�`.�y,'�vd}
0U08!1994 21:00 3050000000
F,5CS1MILE
12/06/1999 17:15 3tl5461
6
LAM(-JAGE SPECIALISrS
AMRNTIS ON BRICKRI.
ICON0OIM1M111M RSSOCtffrjQR!1 imc.
2925 RRICKELL RUENUE
MIRM1, F'LORIOR 331 ZID
+ember 6, IM
Mr. MiclAcl E,4=mn n
SCOM
9Y FAX TCh (AM 373.MSS
Owr Mr. Hourmn:
PAGE 02
T appr®dlatr the °oureny YOU extended to the Atlamtcs on Dirick^il pro
Me"
at
a held
at A1tr prop
Ownere by
zc owl s tha ' b On S+turdity, MO -,ember 20, 1999 and I
edB indications! you made at t)as meeting, a:+ v Of I's in subsequent telopk e
'"'e n"*ns, that you would like to SOJOY and/or mitigaPc ovr concerns rsr�arding tto
Proposed Hrickell Bay Vllt&V developt1rnt.
Please allmv this 10ter to eft!ve ag our cigj
vehicle to clear un �, troubli �ponse to the9v discussions as well as a
4a avntatt itte re � adsunderstanding regarding y,,us repreaent&tivt's Attempt
p�entativet of the At1antj5.
The first contact ttu;t you and I had was whorl
we happened 1n meet at a Uwe
9ricketl Homeowners A�c'ation on Wtdnesday, Novoyrs►yer 71h_ At that time, f t►veI
as at our build' 1
re ` meetiYrg oh Saturday. November 20th, Yot' ►��.ieated
preerntative� have bed erg %r menthe to meet with us r,.�d that youatr@u r that
we were not 1e' vt to Your ofFM to meet and/or negotiate changes to the proposed
devclopn��
and nel abe c C$e6fiOn-that we were either not avoilabr. or not reeepdve to Mee
office until changee � absUgkly not true. Neither (, n„r :hc past bar Sth) nc►r, the chairrnsrt 4f oar comr"(Ce ~ao;� any otthheeunit owhvnwas er was
ever contacted by yw or y� �'�ttad�►es.
rtelin3y You antb9t age ter vote and i met on 6Ve:ar rs: <a;
and you expr*"ed, for the first t L%r your desire to work j� -h t�,, ] and t other November 7th
members moved di}iVntty to accolnnuoata you And to ,
r+ta0lntions. Aa you know, the special Meate Y we rs)lto t'y 0, ccomPhsh reaching some
pled only tht" days a ,ynn and 1 met at the Srickell ;'4omeo-�.mereoAssociationtook
meeting.
Now duet I �� }a,�
Now thM I issue h w "Y seared up this Misunderstanding, 1 will address the
he"'ee we are in a POu icn to drop our "POsitien to your proposed
building ao revised,
Canbncxgcr cJ.i Page 2
record if) with
itetti
A
DIV
01/08/1994 21:00 2050000000
12/09,1999 17:15 3OS4910271
Dremrimr d, 1999
Mir. Michael Bauumnn
Page 2
FACSIMILE
LANaAACE SPECIALISTS
FAGE 04
PAGE 03
The Board and the unit owriets have t0d Inul le Meetings r�
consukgd with � g �gerding this ►xuntter,
toetrtael as w0li NO other pmf*Wonals and delih?-,test a great deal: always
with a view towarda berg as rational and remonable a. and Loss'>'E. he c�onduaions of these
tus or
neetittgs d 'baratioats ii thin we ta�llievQ that t}le changes yOu propose do not benefit
� our irdtito sa �� o al MS• ArtoWly, some of the :h.�» es you propose, purportedly
inwPa�"t on the AtL�tia proMW
owrie8w Qn the %outh sic - ;;f the site, create a wore
propgzty owrners,
"Of YOU claaim#d at our trueft that you are not requesting any varlanan, as we
undarxtaxui it you are req s
Apartments and receive a� ��1°T' fro'the city tobuild in excess of 200
to receive this s 0M am 'ratio ("FAR") benue, We believe that if you want
P sion alld FA,R bonus, bath of whi•-h aary at the discretion of the
city commissiM you Mast be willing to propose and evens', act building which wit! have
Much less of an adveme affedt on propft'tY owners ref the Aiic114is, which abuts the site on
the north, as well ae a n%U& lets adveme effect on the B-;Cl::
r"��lly suggest that if you review the 1l &n of Avenue neighborhood. p4ja I
f'Ianning and Advisory Y cornrnents and fi ��d�� of the Cry. of Miami
ry Bdorld (which reviewed the proposed 1,rafect on May 19, 1999) and
if you are willing to re -think and substVMtiWly re -design your develvpu►ent using this
Board's comments and fitrd*P as a guide, you will end xp with, ,a much better
d
iopment which I am Cu nt the property owners
opposed to.
...)f Atlantis would not be
We are hopeful tlwt at this fioint you "Q witheirour ap!iaw cation for what we consider
o
an irxapproPriate boil Y F. � .
to create ;sea a �R � Meat wank with us and other ,members of the neighborhood
pprvpirislle de+neloraeent fox this very signif;.canE end important site.
With that hope in mind, the Boyrd of Directors and
look forward to hearing front you and working with
Very Tnaly Yuma,
AF_
A.aimme 'Taddeo,
President
the property owners of the Atlantis
you and . our represeMAHVes.
BEFORE THE CITY OF MIAMI COMMISSION
MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA
December 14, 1999
IN RE:
BRICKELL BAY VILLAGE PROJECT
2101-2105 Brickell Avenue
Major Special Use Permit
SUBMISSION BY
ATLANTIS ON BRICKELL CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION
2025 Brickell Avenue
Miami, Florida
KENT HARRISON ROBBINS
Attorney for Atlantis on Brickell
Condominium Association
1224 Washington Avenue
Miami Beach, Florida 33139
Tel: (305) 532-0500
Fax: (305) 531-0150
Fla. Bar No. 27548
r0cord
hem pZ
F.illor
ai
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ARTICLE 17 MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMITS: DETAILED REQUIREMENTS
SECTION 1305 SPECIAL PERMIT'S: CONSIDERATIONS: STANDARDS:
WRITTEN FINDINGS AND DETERMINATIONS
ARTICLE 5: PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
CITY OF MIAMI COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, HOUSING ELEMENT
TAKE NOTICE OF RECORDS
009- 56
ARTICLE 17 MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMITS: DETAILED REQUIREMENTS
In addition to requirements set out in Article 13 applying to special permits.
1702.2 Application content
materials to be submitted with applications for MUSP shall include maps, plans, surveys and reports
that may be reasonably be required to make the necessary determinations.
All of the following shall be required before the application for MUSP shall be considered filed for
processing:
1702.2.1 General report
(3)survey showing property lines and ownership ... existing features... general topography
(6) analysis demonstrating consistency and concurrency with the adopted comprehensive
plan
1702.2.2 MUSP concept plan
(a) "concept plan shall demonstrate ... the relationship of the concept plan to surrounding
existing and proposed uses ... and facilities (...view corridors ...)
1702.2.3 Development Impact Study
"the applicant shall submit a development impact study which shall demonstrate whether the
impact of the proposed development is favorable, adverse, or neutral on the economy, public
services, environment, and housing supply of the City."
1702.8 Application: hearing by City commission
Upon transmission to the city commission of the recommendations of the ... planning
advisory board, the hearing boards division shall set a date for public hearing on the application
pursuant to ... the code of the City of Miami and amendments thereto.
Miami Code Section 62-129: Public Notice Requirements
10 days notice in advance of hearing by posting, advertising, and courtesy mail
1703 Commission disposition of application
giving full consideration to the recommendation of the boards
commission must make determination as to whether
(a) conformity with the comprehensive plan
(if not then procedures must be followed to amend comprehensive plan)
"Commission shall consider where applicable the standards and criteria set forth in section 1305 of
this ordinance applicable to the particular actions or changes proposed:
(5) whether development will have a favorable impact on the environment and natural resources
(6) whether development will adversely affect living conditions in the neighborhood
0 i.) — Q~t r4 c►L 4- e� 0
1305 SPECIAL PERMITS: CONSIDERATIONS: STANDARDS: WRITTEN FINDINGS
AND DETERMINATIONS
... the following considerations and standards shall apply generally, in addition to any other standards
and requirements set forth concerning the class or kind of permit being considered. ...boards charged
with decisions concerning special permits shall make ... written findings and determinations
concerning the following matters as are applicable in the case, shall reflect such considerations and
standards in their decisions as to issuance of permits, with or without conditions or safeguards
1305.8 Control of potentially adverse effects generally
.... review ofr appropriateness shall be given to potentially adverse effects generally on adjoining
and nearby properties, the area, the neighborhood, or the city, of the use or occupancy as proposed,
or its location, construction, design, character, scale or manner of operation. Where such potentially
adverse effects are found, consideration shall be given to special remedial measures appropriate in
the particular circumstances of the case, including screening or buffering, landscaping, ...alteration
of proposed design or construction of buildings, relocation of proposed open space or alteration of
use of such space, or such other measures as are required to assure that such potential adverse effects
will be eliminated or minimized to the maximum extent reasonably feasible, and that the use or
occupancy will be compatible and harmonious with other development in the area to a degree whcih
will avoid substantial depreciation of the value of nearby property
ARTICLE 5 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
Sec 500 Application of regulations:
intent of PUD
l greater flexibility in pattern of development
2.improved level of amenities
3. Appropriate and harmonious varitey in physical development
4 creative design
5 Improved environment
For PUD in residential district, consideration shall be given to:
(a) general housing needs in city as whole
(b) housing needs in the neighborhood in which the development is proposed
(c)the need for particular types of housing
In such consideration, due weight shall be given to availability of existing housing supply for which
there is need in view of age and economic characteristics of the population, and the amount and
types of potential new housing under building permits issued and plans for development.
Sec 502 PUD
(b) R-4 150 units per net acre
(c) an increase in floor area ratio of up to twenty (20) percent over that allowed by the underlying
district
0 `'
CITY OF MIAMI COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, HOUSING ELEMENT
Objective 140-1.1: Provide a local regulatory, investment, and neighborhood environment that will
assist the private sector in increasing the stock of affordable housing within the city at least 10
percent by 1994 and 20 percent by the year 1999
Goal HO- I Increase the supply of safe, affordable and sanitary housing for low and moderate income
households by alleviating shortages of low and moderate income housing.,.... maintaining and
revitalizing residential neighborhoods
Objective HO-1.2: Conserve the present stock of low and moderate income housing within the city
PolicyHO 1.2.1: The City defines low income housing as residential units whose associated housing
costs are affordable to households who earn no more than 50 percent of the median income in Dade
County
Policy HO-1.2.2: Continue, and when necessary expand, low and moderate -income housing
programs with the intent of preventing a net loss of low and moderate -income housing units within
the city.
TAKE NOTICE OF RECORDS
The all records and writings submitted as part of the file and Application
p
Video Tae and Transcript of May 19, 1999 Planning & Advisory Board and 7-1 Decision against
project
Atlantis on Brickell condominium submission at May 19, 1999 hearing
Video Tape of December 13, 1999 Planning & Advisory Board
Atlantis on Brickell condominium submission at December 13, 1999 hearing
Jack S. 5chnettler, P.E.
Vice President/Transportation Division Manager
PBS&J
Education
Mr. Sclnettler is responsible for directing a variety of multidiscipline
M.S., Urban Studies,
transportation planning services in the firm's Miami office including
University of Nebraska at Omaha,
transportation planning, transit feasibility studies, transit service and operating
1983
plans, route and alignment studies, and environmental assessments. He is also
experienced in functional planning, corridor studies, traffic capacity and
M.S., Civil Engineering,
impact studies, traffic safety and operations analyses, circulation and parking
Northwestern University, 1972
studies, and toll facilities analyses. His background also includes major roles
B.S., Civil Engineering,
on large project/program management assignments involving freeways, transit
Washington University, 1970
facilities, toll roads and privatization projects. Mr. Sclinettler is also familiar
with a wide range of traffic and transportation modeling and analytical
Registrations
software for demand analysis, capacity analysis, financial planning,
Professional Engineer
simulation, and comparative analyses.
Florida
Texas
He has a strong project management background and has directed and
Iowa
participated in numerous major transportation projects. This representative
Nebraska
project experience includes:
Professional Afliations
Traffic Studies
Institute of Transportation Engineers
Seaquarium Village Development of Regional Impact (DRI) Traffic
American Society of Civil Engineers
Impact Study, Miami, Florida - Project manager for traffic and parking
Florida Engineering Society
analysis for theme park redevelopment including oceanarium, water park,
National Society of Professional
high-tech theatre and restaurant plaza
Engineers
1-95 Interchange Justification Reports. West Palm Beach, Florida -
Development of analyses and reports for two new interchanges on I-95
for a proposed Downtown Connector and Palm Beach International
Airport Connector
• Westpointe Corporate Center, Miami, Florida - Project manager for
DRI involving office, bank and warehouse space in West Miami -Dade
County
• Westside Corporate Center, Miami, Florida - Manager for traffic
element of DRI for office park complex adjacent to Ryder Corporation
headquarters
• Hemmeter Continental Resort, Key Biscayne, Florida - Manager of
traffic element for DRI involving resort hotel and condominium project
• U.S. 1 Traffic Capacity Study, Monroe County, Florida - Project
manager and participant in an intergovernmental task force to establish a
speed -based methodology for evaluating special traffic capacity
conditions on U.S. 1 through the Florida Keys.
• Urban Transport Study, Barquisimeto, Venezuela - Manager for
study to upgrade traffic and transit operations in city of 750,000.
Functional Planning
• I-70/1-270/Quebec Street Interchange Concepts, Denver, Colorado -
Project manager for development of functional concept alternatives and
preliminary geometry for improvements to the highly congested
interchange complex adjacent to Stapleton International Airport; project
involved use of microcomputer models.
• Port of Miami Tunnel Project Development and Environmental
(PD&E) Study, Miami, Florida - Management of planning, functional
alignment and environmental analysis of alternatives for a $250 million
tunnel connection between I-395 and the Pont of Miami.
t
Jack S. Schnettier, P.E.
Page 2
• Wycliffe Avenue Underpass Study, Dallas, Texas - Project manager
for a study of a railroad underpass in a location with a high water table
stream crossing, and flood plain location. An extended roof decking
system to pass under the railroad, channel, and parking lot created a
tunnel solution.
• SR 826/Paimetto Expressway, Miami, Florida - Project manager for
multi -modal long-range freeway master plan for 17-mile corridor
considering high occupancy vehicle (HOV) lanes, special transit services,
and IVMS elements.
Southwest Freeway Schematic Design, .Ft. Worth, Texas - Project
manager for a five -month project to examine geometric alignment and
interchange alternatives for a 5.5-mile section of an eight -lane urban
freeway with three major interchanges and numerous design constraint
the final report presented traffic operational analyses and 100-scale plan
and profile geometry for the mainline and all ramps
• Brownfield Road Corridor Study, Lubbock, Texas - Project manager
for 6.5-mile corridor study to upgrade four/six lane arterial to an
access -controlled facility work included extensive traffic analysis,
alternative schematics and comparative evaluation
• Australian Avenue/Belvedere Road Overpass Study, West Palm
Beach, Florida - Project manager for study of grade separation for major
arterial streets. Major considerations included traffic forecasts,
cost-effectiveness, right-of-way (ROW) and construction costs, and
property impacts with use of HCM and TRANSYT-717 to evaluate
alternatives
• Okeechobee Boulevard Corridor Study (1-95 to U.S.1), West Palm
Beach, Florida - Development of arterial expressway and interchange
geometric alternatives based on 20-year traffic projections through
conceptual and functional phases.
Transit Projects
• Tri-Rail Airport -to -Seaport Feasibility Study, Miami, Florida -
Evaluation of alignment and technology options for heavy rail commuter
service between the two Miami ports
Metrorail Transition Study, Miami, Florida - Evaluation of alternative
transit corridor alignments and identification of technology alternatives
• Transit Operations Audit, Lubbock, Texas - Project manager for an
efficiency and effectiveness review leading to operational
recommendations
• Five -Year Transit Operations Plans, various cities - Project manager
or senior engineer on studies to evaluate transit services, survey users and
the public, and formulate capital and operational recommendations in
these cities:
- Brownsville, Texas
- San Angelo, Texas
- St. Joseph, Missouri
- Quad Cities, Illinois/Iowa
- Harlingen/San Benito, Texas
- Fort Smith, Arkansas
- Billings, Montana
- Clinton, Iowa
- Lubbock, Texas
y_.4_ :`�
Jack S. Schnettler, P.E.
Page 3
Transit Transfer Facilities, various cities - Project manager for
planning or evaluation of transfer facilities for bus services in:
- Vancouver, Washington
- Omaha, Nebraska
- Billings, Montana
- Miami, Florida
- San Juan, Puerto Rico
Transportation Planc
• Harlingen San Benito, Texas Long -Range Urban Transportation Plan
• San Juan, Puerto Rico Lagoon Bridge and Puerto Rico 66 Corridor
Network Analysis
• Vega Baja - Manati, Puerto Rico Urban Transportation Plan
• . Ponce, Puerto Rico Travel Modelling Analysis
• Mayaguez, Puerto Rico Regional Travel Model
Project/Program Management
• SR 826 Palmetto Expressway Improvement Program, Miami,
Florida - Manager of highway planning for 17.5-mile freeway corridor
• Puerto Rico Toll Road Privatization Program, San Juan, Puerto
Rico - Project manager for highway planning for numerous roadway
projects including corridor analyses, preliminary engineering studies,
traffic analysis and financial feasibility
• Metromover Brickell South Extension, Miami, Florida - Project
planning manager responsible for updating the environmental assessment
for the peoplemover, coordinating alignment adjustments to reduce
right-of-way, and reviewing intersection modifications and parking
impacts
• Metrorail Transit System, Miami, Florida - Project engineer
coordinating adjustments to streets below the elevated guideway.
RT09027. W45
SICROTO RONDON
P,O, BOX 70261
FL LaidmWc, Florida 33307
(934) 764.3113
PROJECT MANAGER
QUALMCATIONS AND AREAS OF EXPERTISE
*Dedp-
-EmoftAbmWm fbr tito plan chmMM as dhwted by WabnM COnatructkm Team
sNuummment
pumft*ct*ftm&ough0ut bid groan, pmhaag mgWmmta, XW pr-bid =,6ng
-BMW Local, State, and Federal pm* requavmmb for projeot implementation
and adcniadastu irm for' control, refem'ch, budget plm.6&
opemtlom
PROFESSIONAL DESIGN AND pRojECT MANAiGnaNT-1969=1999
LAURA URBAN RESOURCE URCE ROUP/.ECIII+B.EATC. hdtami, Florida
ALEX KNiC}HT LANDSCAPE .AIt HORN dt ASSOCIATES Vero Beach, Florida
OMM OU MOORS INC Coral S CfIIT'E inA ridr, F/gLANNiNC3 Coral Oabloe, Florida
ENV'RONWNTAL PLANNING AND DESIGN Roca Raton
DAVE BODKER LANDSCAPE ARC.HITEC Florida
CITY OF BOCA RATON Boca Raton, Floridan Delray Beach, Florida
EDUCATION;
Bachelor Sciancm Degree in Landreapc Architecture LoWajana
StW UniMaity
DARRYL K. SHARPTON, CPA/ABV
TECHNICAL REVIEW PARTNER
Position Director, Consulting and Litigation Support Groups
Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A.
Education and B.S., Florida State University
Certifications Certified Public Accountant, State of Florida
Professional History Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. - Partner, 1984
Price Waterhouse - Audit Senior, 1983; Staff Accountant, 1979
Professional and Mr. Sharpton has over 19 years of public accounting experience,
Business Experience sixteen 0 6) of these years have involved analysis and estimating
business valuations and damages. Darryl has worked on
substantially all Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. litigation
support engagements and has been an expert witness on all of the
firm's litigation jobs.
Mr. Sharpton earned the designation of ABV (Accredited in Business
Valuation) from The American Institute of Certified Public
Accountants in February, 1999. The ABV designation is granted
exclusively to a select group of certified public accountants who
demonstrate substantial experience and expertise in the business
valuation field.
Mr. Sharpton has extensive experience in a number of industries
including real estate, insurance, hotel operations and entertainment,
professional services, municipalities and others.
He is an Alumnus of a "Big 5" accounting firm. Areas of specialty
include:
• Business Valuations and Damage Estimation
• Capital Budget Development and Evaluation
• Economic Impact Analysis
• Strategic Planning
• Feasibility Studies
Additionally, he has gained auditing and accounting experience by
participating in the following engagements:
• The Rouse Company
• Knight Ridder, Inc.
• Burger King Corporation
• Ryder System, Inc.
• Miami Sports and Exhibition Authority
• Florida Department of Insurance
• Texaco, Inc.
• American Bankers Insurance Group
��- �IJ
IDARRYL K. SHARPTON, CPA/ABV
TECHNICAL REVIEW PARTNER
Professional and • Member, American Institute of Certified Public Accountants
Community Activities • Member, Florida Institute of Certified Public Accountants
• Trustee, Miami Bayside Foundation, Inc.
• Board of Governors, Greater Miami Chamber of Commerce
• Board of Directors, The Vizcayans
• Board of Directors, One Nation, Inc.
• Board of Governors, The Bankers Club
• Board of Directors, Liberty City Optimist Club of Florida, Inc.
'9- �(; -i
ZONED
RITZ CARLTON
R-4*
MILLENNIUM
SD-5*
BRISTOL
R-4
BRICKELL BAYFRONT CLUB
SD-5
BRICKELL BAY PLAZA
SD-5
BRICKELL POINT
SD-5
BRICKELL ON THE RIVER
SD-5
BISCAYNE BAY TOWER
R-4/SD-20
YACHT CLUB AT BRICKELL I
SD-5
YACHT CLUB AT BRICKELL II
SD-5
*SD-5 FAR 4.25 Residential
3.25 Commercial
4.25 Mix Use
*R-4 FAR 1.72
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
BONUS
Y
Y
Y
Jt!�J 71it°;j tl�f Z p!!t'!jr
record t__iti41,
on
IiVai'tf)r
Cii �tC9 de
s
MA"ty d, CLAY COUNTr EOM WG COWaSSIOPT I. Shipping C�27 Fla. 555
Cite as, Fla., 225 9o.2d 555
appeal. See: Biro v. Geiser, F1a.1967, 199
Where transaction out of which note So•2d 461 ; Light v. King, F1a.App.1965,
arose involved written agreements indicat- 179 So.2d 398; Accord Jones v. Life In-
ing that vessel was sold "as is, where is", surance Company of Florida, F1a.App.1968,
any oral representation or warranties as to 215 So.2d 889.
performance capabilities of vessel were ex-
cluded.
2. Appeal and Error «173(2)
Where no issue was raised in trial
court as to failure'of consideration nor was
specific affirmative defense pleaded, such
issue was not properly raised on appeal.
Shorenstein & Lewis and Richard C.
Lewis, Miami Beach, for appellant.
Shutts & Bowen and Robert C. Som-
merville, Miami, for appellee. /
Before PEARSON, C. J
CHARLES CARROLL, and BARKD
JJ-
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, defendant in the trial court,
seeks review of an adverse summary judg-
ment in an action to collect on a promissory
note. He urges as points on appeal a
breach of oral warranties and a failure of
consideration for the execution of the
promissory note. We find no error in the
judgment here under review.
[1,21 The four written agreements in-
volved in the transaction out of which the
promissory note arose, indicate that a vessel
was sold "as is, where is", which clearly
excluded any oral representation or warran-
ties as to the performance capabilities of
the vessel. Yanish v. Fernandez, 156 Colo.
225, 397 P.2d 881; Findley v. Downing
Motors, Inc., 79 Ga.App. 682, 54 S.E.2d
716; Holbrook v. Capital Automobile Com-
pany, III Ga.App. 601, 142 S.E.2d 288.
No proper issue was raised as to the failure
of consideration; no specific affirmative
defense was pleaded and, without such, this
matter is not properly raised as a point on
Therefore, for the reasons above stated,
the final summary judgment here under
review be and the same is hereby affirmed.
Affirmed.
Clarence H. MALLEY and Essle S.
Maltey, his wife, Appellants,
V.
CLAY COUNTY ZONING COMMIS-
SION, Appellee.
No. J-495.
District Court of Appeal of Florid
FIrst District.
Aug. 5, 1969.
Rehearing ]Jenied Sept. 3, 1969.
Appeal from judgment of the Circuit
Court, Clay County, Frank H. Elmore, J.,
granting injunction restraining defendant
landowners from keeping or maintaining
livestock on their land contrary to provi-
sions of zoning ordinance. The District
Court of Appeal, Wigginton, J., held that
where defendant landowners appeared at
hearing to consider zoning ordinance and
did not claim" to have been prejudiced in any
%
manner because of fact that notice of hear-
ing published by zoning commission lacked
one day of complying with notice require -
meets, landowners waived defective notice
of hearing and were estopped to urge same
G�
as ground for attacking validity of ordi-
nance. :�ri':• ,.. ;
Affirmed.r1
.qon,
i
c c
556 Fla.
I. Zoning t9"—..24
225 SOUTHERN REPORTER, 2d SERIEB
While compliance with statutory notice
of hearing is ordinarily mandatory and
jurisdictional to enactment of valid zoning
ordinance, contesting landowner may waive
right or be estopped to assert defect in
notice if he appeared at hearing and availed
himself of opportunity of fully and ade-
quately presenting his objection.
2. Zoning 4=24
Where defendant landowners appeared
at hearing to consider zoning ordinance
and did not claim to have been prejudiced
in any manner because of fact that notice
of hearing published by zoning commission
lacked one day of complying with notice
requirements, landowners waived defective
notice of hearing and were estopped to urge
same as ground for attacking validity of or-
dinance.
Howell & Deas, Jacksonville, for appel-
lants.
Scruby & Yonge, Orange Park, for ap-
pellee.
WIGGINTON, Judge.
Defendant landowners have appealed a
summary final judgment granting an in-
junction permanently restraining them from
keeping or maintaining Iivestock on their
land contrary to the provisions of a zoning
ordinance recently enacted by plaintiff
zoning commission. They contend that the
ordinance is void because proper notice had
not been published of the time and place of
the hearing at which it was adopted.
The comprehensive zoning ordinance pur-
suant to which defendants' land was re-
zoned requires that at least 15 days notice
be given of the time and place of the hear-
ing at which a zoning ordinance will be con -
I. 96 A.L.R.2d 461 et seq., $ 5.
2. City of Hollywood v. Petersen, (Fla.App.
1965) 178 So.2d 919 ; City of Hollywood
v. Rix, (F1a.1951) 52 So.2d 13.5.
sidered. Although the notice of the hearing
published by plaintiff commission lacked
one day of complying with the requirements
of the governing law, defendants appeared
at the hearing and expressed their objec-
tion to the proposed ordinance.
In the judgment appealed the trial court
found that even though proper notice of
the hearing at which the ordinance was
adopted had not been given, nevertheless
defendants' appearance at the hearing con-
stituted a waiver of the insufficiency of
notice and they were estopped to challenge
the validity of the ordinance on this ground.
The weight of authority in the United
States subscribes to the view that legal re-
quirements calling for notice in a particular
manner and form preliminary to the adop-
tion or amendment of a zoning law are
generally construed as mandatory and juris-
dictional, and measures passed in contra-
vention thereof are invalid.l
Florida has adopted the majority view.
It has been held in this state that in the
promulgation of zoning regulations there
must be strict adherence to the require-
ments of notice and hearing preliminary to
the adoption of such regulations2 In re-
viewing a conviction of one charged with
the violation of a zoning ordinance which
was adopted without complying with the
notice requirements of F.S. Section 176.05,
F.S.A., our Supreme Court said:
" * * * The specific grant of zoning
power is conditioned by the provision for
notice and public hearing. Since the
City Commission did not comply with the
notice and public hearing provisions, the
ordinance under which the petitioner was
arrested and convicted was invalid. The
judgment of affirmance in the Circuit
Court should be, and hereby is, quash-
ed."3
Having established that compliance with
notice and hearing requirements of a
3. Ellison v. City of Fort Lauderdale, (Fla.
1966) 183 So.2d 193, 195.
SILVER BLUE LAKE APTS. v. SILVER BLUE LAKE H. 0. ASS'N Fla. 557
Cite as, Fla., 225 So.2d 56T
zoning law is mandatory and jurisdictional, commission's failure to strictly comply with
we move next to the question of whether a the notice requirements of the law. Under
person may, by his affirmative action, the circumstances we are of the view that
waive an insufficient notice of hearing appellants waived the defective notice of
given preliminarily to the adoption of a hearing and are now estopped to urge this
zoning ordinance, and thereby become as a ground for attacking the validity of the
equitably estopped from asserting such de- ordinance. The judgment appealed is ac-
fect as a ground for challenging the validity cordingly affirmed.
of the ordinance.
The general rule is stated by the author
of Corpus Juris Secundum to be:
"Waiver; Effect of Actual Notice.
Where adequate notice is a jurisdic-
tional, and not merely a procedural, mat-
ter, persons who appear at the hearing
and fail to object are not estopped to ob-
ject later. * * * " 4
Conversely, it would seem to follow that a
person who appears at the hearing and fully
registers his objection may be estopped to
later object on the ground of defective
notice of hearing.
[1] Although there is authority to the
contrary, the majority of jurisdictions in
this country have adopted what we con-
sider to be the sounder view that while
compliance with statutory notice of hearing
is ordinarily mandatory and jurisdictional
to the enactment of a valid zoning ordi-
nance, a contesting landowner may waive
the right or be estopped to assert a defect
in the notice so as to invalidate the ordi-
nance if he appeared at the hearing and
availed himself of the opportunity of fully
and adequately presenting his objections
[2] Defendants in the case sub judice
appeared in person at the hearing when the
zoning ordinance under attack was con-
sidered and adopted. They do not contend
that the notice was so lacking in compliance
with the requirements of law that they did
not have sufficient time or opportunity to
fully prepare and present their objections at
the hearing which they attended. Neither
do they contend that they were preju-
diced in any manner because of the zoning
4. 101 C.J.S. Zoning § 302, P. 1084.
CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting Chief
Judge, and SPECTOR, J., concur.
w
o i to ruNut mTw
T
SILVER BLUE LAKE APARTMENTS,
INC., a Florida corporation, John Lelsen-
ring, Harold M. Diamond and Bernard
Sandel, Appellants,
V.
SILVER BLUE LAKE HOME OWNERS
ASSOCIATION, INC., a corporation not
for profit existing under the lays of the
State of Florida, William M. DeLisa and
Harris J. Buchbinder, Appellees.
No. 68-1102.
District Court of Appeal of Florida.
Third District.
July 29, 1969.
Rehearing Denied Sept. 2, 1969.
Owners of land underlying a man-
made lake sought to enjoin an allegedly
unreasonable use of surface of lake by
tenants of an apartment complex bordering
lake. The Circuit Court for Dade County,
Francis X. Knuck, J., granted relief, and
defendant appealed. The District Court
of Appeal held that determination that only
owners of land underlying man made lake
could use surface waters of lake was a
reasonable classification which treated all
owners equally, so that further determina-
tion that corporate owner of apartment
5. 96 A.L.R.2d 476-479, §§ 11, 12.
0
SILZIN SumaERG DUNN PRICE & AxELROD LLP
A PARTNERSHIP OF PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS
2500 FIRST UNION FINANCIAL CENTER
200 SOUTH BISCAYNE BOULEVARD • MIAM1, FLORIDA 33131-2336
TELEPHONE: (308) 374-7S60 . FAX: 1305) 374-7593
r--MAIL: INFOODILZIN.COM
ONE EAST BROWARO BOULEVARD • SUITE 700
FORT LAUOERDALE, FLORIOA 33301
TELEPHONE: 1954) 356-0030 • FAX: (984) 336-0406
A. Vicky Garcia -Toledo. Esq.
Direct Dial. 905-3S0-2409
E-Mail. vleiva@biltia.coat
Jeff Bass, Esquire
Shubin & Bass, P.A.
46 Southwest First Street
Miami, Florida 33130
Re: Bricks!! Bair Village
Dear Gentlemen:
October 4, 1999
Kent Harrison Robbins
1224 Washington Avenue
Miami Beach, FL 33139
Back in July we made changes to the above referenced project and forwarded a
rendering to the property manager at Bristol Towers. We were informed that many of the
members of the association were on vacation as well as the general membership of the
area's homeowner's association and as a result, we waited patiently for everyone to return.
On August 30th, I obtained additional copies of the rendering and sent them on to
both of your offices. I have not heard from either one of you and this concerns me, since
I am sure that like my client, your clients would wish to move this issue along. I would like
to request a meeting individually with each one of you and your clients at the soonest
available date. Please let me know when a meeting would be convenient to your clients
so that I can coordinate a mutually agreeable date and time.
As you are aware, my client, JAN Holdings, has all the financial commitments in
place for this project including but not limited to construction financing,
all capital required commitments for the project as well as the selection of a contractor n�
t
a fixed price basis. Therefore, it is imperative that we meet in an attempt to resolve any
outstanding issues that your clients may have and that we move this matter forward with
diligence.
Please remember that the Brickell Bay Village Project requires no variances from
the City of Miami Code, is designed below the maximum density allowed and meets all
code requirements without exception. It is therefore in everyone's best interest that any
outstanding issues be addressed and resolved at the earliest possible opportunity.
Stabrrtitted into the pu ,'i,
record in connPcVon
S 9 — i Item &32of,
Waf }er Fcien i,.
-- City cier.
E31LZIN SUM®E:RCs DUNN
Oct & AXELROb LLp
Jeff Bass, Esq.
(Cent Harrison Robbins
October 5, 1999
Page 2
_..,.Toledo
cc: Aslan Palachi
G:1DMS%73240%l 020S%025 l 150.01
7/23/99
� - tj
BILZIN SUMBERG DUNN PRICE & AXELROD LLP
A OARTNERSHIP OF "ROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS
2500 FIRST UNION FINANCIAL CENTER
200 SOUTH BISCAYNE BOULEVARD - MIAMI, FLORIDA 33131-2336
TELEPHONE: (305) 374-7580 - INFO®81L21N.COM
FAX: (305) 374-7593 - BROWARD: (954) 482-6808
A. Vicky Garcia -Toledo, Esq.
Direct Dial: (305) 3SO-2409
E-Mail: vtetvara,bll-ln,com
September 1, 1999
Kent Harrison Robbins
1224 Washington Avenue
Miami Beach, FL 33139
Re: Brickell Bay Village / AtIantis Condominium
Dear Mr. Robbins:
Enclosed you will find a copy of the revised site plan and elevations for the Brickell Bay Village project.
I apologize for the delay in delivering these to you but they were not received in my office
from the architect until yesterday.
I hope this will give your clients a flavor for the changes that have been made to the project.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me. I look forward to hearing from you.
A. Vick"arcia-Toledo
AVGT:em
cc: Michael Baumann
Asian Palachi
G:OMS\73646\ 11342\0256945, 01
9/31/99
0 - 961
0
BILZIN SUMBI=RG DUNN PRIcE & AXELR00 LLP
A PARTNERSHIP OF PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS
2500 FIRST UNION FINANCIAL CENTER
200 SOUTH SISCAYNE BOULEVARD • MIAM1, FLORIDA 33131-2338
TELEPHONE: (305) 374-7580 • INFO®BILZIN.COM
FAX: 1305) 374-7593 • BROWARO: (984) 462-8808
Jeff Bass, Esquire
Shubin & Bass, P.A.
46 Southwest First Street
Miami, Florida 33130
Re: Brickell Bay Village
Dear Gentlemen:
July 23, 1999
Kent Harrison Robbins
1224 Washington Avenue
Miami Beach, FL 33139
It is my understanding that we are all in agreement that the above referenced matter
scheduled before the City Commission on July 271" will need to be continued.
To that effect, I will appear before the City Commission on Tuesday to request such
a continuance.
AVGT:em
cc: Ana Gelabert-Sanchez
Teresita Fernandez
G:\DMS\73240\ 10208%0251150.01
7/23/99
Sincerely,
A. Vicky Garcia -Toledo
SIGNED IN HER ABSENCE TO AVOID DELAY
a�J 9
SUMBERO DUNN PRICE & &iLROD LLP
• PA"NrPIS'1e Or Z90rESSIONA4. ASSOC A' C%S
2500 P AST ..141014 r NAh,C A_ CEN-ER
E00 SCUTW S-SCAYNE 90.LEvA140 . M AMI, F_CRICA 33 31-2336
*CLfef-ONE: (3031 374-7580 .:Nr0391LZ N.COM
r AX: (Joe) a7A-7bD0 . 8'RQYIA4p, 1994, 4a2.6908
Jeff Bass, Esquire
Shubin & Bass, P.A.
46 Southwest First Street
Miami, Florida 33130
Re: Br/ckell Bay V/Ilea@
Dear Jeff:
June 16, 1999
Kent Harrison Robbins
1224 Washington Avenue
Miami Beach, FL 33139
This letter will serve to confirm our agreement that I will be asking for a continuance
before the City Commission meeting scheduled for Tuesday, June 22, 1999 on the above
referenced matter,
By copy of this letter I am informing the City of our intent to request such a
continuance to a date certain of July 27, 1999. 1 hope this notification to your clients as
well as the City will prevent any unnecessary inconvenience to all parties involved.
Please rest assured that we look forward to using the time allowed by the extension
to work with you and the neighbors in finding an amicable solution.
(
Sincer
A, Vic y Garcia -Toledo
HVGT.em
cc: Dena Bianchino, Assistant City Manager, City of Miami
Ana Gelabert-Sanchez, Director of Planning, City of Miami
Teresita Fernandez, Hearing Boards, City of Miami
Asian Palachi
0 MMS03240110208\0246119.0I
6119199
01,
KENT HARRISON ROBBINS
ATTORNEY AT LAW
1 224 WASHINGTON AVENUE
MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA 33' 39
t305I 532.0500
June 18. 1999
By Fax: 305-374-75
A. Vicky Garcia-Tol o
Bilzin Sumberg Dun Price & Axelrod
2500 First Union Fin ncial Center
200 South Biscayne oulevard
Miami, Florida 33'13
Re: Brickell Bay Vill*e
Dear Ms. Garcia -Toledo:
This letter will confer that you have represented to me that your client will not go forward
with his presentation f the above project to the Miami City Commission until July 27, 1999
and that, according! you are requesting a continuance of the June 22, 1999 hearing
before the City Corn fission.
Based on the abov Atlantis on Brickell Condominium Association, Inc., 2025 Brickell
Avenue, will not obj t to your continuance request.
ely,
K nt arris obbi s
cc: Jeffrey Rubinstei , President:of the Atlantis on Brickell Condominium Association, Inc.
0 0
BILZIN SUMBERG DUNN PRICE & AXELROD LLP
A PARTNERSHIP OF PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS
2500 FIRST UNION FINANCIAL CENTER
200 SOUTH BISCAYNE BOULEVARD . MIAMI, FLORIOA 33131-2336
TELEPHONE: 1305) 374-7580 • INFOOBILZIN.COM
FAX: (305) 374-7593 a SROWARO: (954) 462-6809
May 24, 1999
Kent Harrison Robbins
1224 Washington Avenue
Miami Beach, FL 33139
Re: Brickell Bay Village / Atlantis Condominium
Dear Mr. Robbins:
The purpose of this letter is as a follow up to a message which I left at your office regarding
the above referenced project.
I have been instructed by my clients to contact you as the legal representative of the Atlantis
Condominium in order to request a meeting with you and your clients for the purpose of discussing
development parameters that would be acceptable to your clients as well as mine.
I look forward to hearing from you to either schedule such a meeting or in the alternative to
receive from you an outline of those development parameters.
A. ViWY Garcia -Toledo
AVGT:em
cc: Brickell Point Holdings
G:OMS\73 646\ 11342\0242463.01
sa4/99
u
BANKERS FINANCIAL TEL N0.305 858 5248 -.."'Nbv 15.9� y
Minutes of the BHA Board of Dire F ors Meeting
June 16, 1999, Brickell Place 1,1901 Briekell Avenue
i re�rAlgrna
Janice Jones/The Palace
Yvonne Oppenheim/Z5 Bay Tower
Harry Thai/Bristol Tower*
Paul Lewin/Drlckell Bay Club
Keith A. Heynolds/Brickell Key One
Joe Bier/Brickell Place I
Ron Smith, Esq./Villa Regina
Florence Mazer/The Imperial
Herbert J. Salley/Brickell Forest
Bruce Cotten/2000 Brickell
Micky Biss/The Atlantis
T. Sinclair (Tory) Jacobs/Brickell 25
Henry H. Taylor, Jr., Esq., General Counsel
Assoclate_Menbers_Present
Megan Kelly/Sw1re Properties
slatmitted into the p„ t)iic
in connection with
re
City of-.Miami_Present
Commissioner J.L. Plummer, Jr./City Commission Chairman
Annie Sterling/Commissioner Plummer's staff
Kelly Marlette/Mayor Carollo's staff
Lissette de Armas/Commissioner Sanchez' staff
Patricia Castro/Downtown NET
Tony Wagner/Coral Way NET
Captain Martinez, Major Rojas, Officer Giordano/M.P.D.
Miami .D_ade Counnty Present
Commissioner Jimmy Morales/County Commission
Marla Elena Levrant/Commissioner Morales' --staff
Pepe Valdez, Virginia Diaz/Miami-Dade Transit
Also Present
John Hozberg/President, Brickell Area Assoc. (19
Natalie Brown/Communic:atlons Plus
Ralph S1on1m, MD/Villa Regina
1 nrnna , ammirirtinprvera Real ate
G 9'g 1
�61
oil
a
The meeting was called to order at 6:15 p.IIL
Florence Mazer moved and Jan Jones seconded tlmt the reading ofthe May minutes be waived and the
minutes accepted as published. The motion passed unanimously,
President's Report
Supplement Waste Fee Rcfunds: The City ofMiami reports the checks are ready to be nwiled; just
awaiting the drafting ofa cover memo.
Brickeil Aren Traffic; The newt'narkings at 15thKoad and Brickell were winpletcd.
B rickell Medians - City of Miami Public Works Director Tim Kay conveyed great concern about tlic lack
of improvement on the medians. The leaky pipe irrigation system must be replaced afterall. Tree trimming
has becit done.
Ca n d id a tcs Foru in : The BriekoU Area Association would like to join x3HA and the Roads groups as a
cosponsor for the full foruin which will behold after qualifying deadline (Sept.18), in October.
Mickell Party: Tuesday, June 29th, at Firehouse Four, from 5:30 to 7 p.m. all are invited for joint BAAI
BHA social.
Miami City Commissioner X Plummer's Report
Franchising Commercial Waste Haulers: 20 companies will be lianchised to provide services in the City
ofHami. Not exclusive and not by districts. New rules are being implemented where few currently exist.
Charter Reform: The new draft does not address mayoral issues. Many items need to be addressed and
receive public input and hearings. Doesn't think it will make theNovember Ballot due to aced for input.
Meeting Agendas: Will start to be published on cable channel 9 at a time certain (T)3D).
1900 B rickell: City is watching to seethat the covenants that granted the plastic surgeonpernvssion to
convert the home into an office are being adhered to. So far the tree that was cut down illegally has not been
replaced; the number of parking spaces permitted is 5 and there seems to be paving for. more. NF.T
Administrator Tony Wagner is on top ofthe situation
NET Administrator 'Tony Wagner
Homeless: An encampment at 1501 S. Miami Avenue property has been identified and referred to the
I'iomeless Assistance Center. Others in Simpson Park and under the bridge have been dealt with.
Lots Weed In g Clca n i ng: Those in BrickeU area that need clearing have bw! i notified. If the owncrs don't
take action, the City will go in and do the job and charge the owners.
Harris Property: No other permits are pending. The new owners are awaiting National Historical dcsigwt-
tion.
police Officer Jeff Giordano
Speed Trailer: Deployed on Brickc1l today.
Security Seminar: The Police are eal;cr to do a follow-up session; Fall seems to be the best utrgat time.
BHA Secretary Mac Seligmanwiill be consulted as the BHA coordinator.
Fatality on Briekell at New Years: No citations were issued after investigation. n f, ` � 6
bHlVfjtKJ t IIMMIVl.1Hl. • ,1 G�. IKU . JVJ OJv ,UG40 _ iw v t J 1 J:/ .Y • J.7 � •VV
Transit Not Tolls Presentation Commissioner Jimmy Momt!•es
Ron Smith introduced the Transit Not Tolls initiative and C OMCNs (Coalition o N41ainl-Dade Commtut ty
%ko"` Associations) support oftht; urnu pt.
Commission Morales presented an overview ofthe Peneles plan to add a penny :;ales tax to generate a
dedicated source offunds for transit which would draw down billions ofdollars in federal support for
trttmportation improvements in Haini-Dade.
Ron Stnith moved and Henry Taylor Jr. seconded the: motion:
"The Brickell Homeowners Association endorses and supports the Miami -Dude Cotsnnty renclas Penny
Sales Tex Plan for Tmilsptnrtation and Transit Improvements which provides for ck ,Uniting tolls on certain
roads and generating new revenue for transportation Rom a one cent sales tax incrcrise and urges ull votcrs
to support the initiative."
It pcisscxl unwiiniously.
Development of the Brickell Bay Village property, Z101-210-5 Brickell Avenue
Discussion took place about the proposed 29-story rental apartment building with ,2 1 units and six hours
of above -ground parking that would be sandwiched between Bristol Tower and "rhe Atlantis. There is great
concern about the density and impact of such a property and both neighboring p, )p, crt ics have hired legal
representation and are voicing strong opposition to the City ofmami. The matt^r s to go before the City
Commissioners in just a matter Ways for a vote on the Major Use SpecialPcr. •- _.
Florence Mazer moved and Htury Thal seeondcd the Tngf.-ion: _.
�✓ "The Brickell Hontcowners Association is opposed to the granting of s Major U sc 5pecW Permit for [lie
proposed Brickell Bay Village Apartments Project at 2101-2105 Brickell Avetn ::as presently designed."
Il passed xmmainwusly.
Further, it was suggested by BHA counsel Henry Taylor Jr. thtn BHA have a "lric e :; f the court" attunrey
present at the City Commission meeting to demonstrate ilia BIWs opposition r- , support ofWstol Tower
and The Atlantis. BHA Director Ron Smith, who is an attorney with zoning con- •,ilia; experience, volun-
teercd to represent the 1311A on apro he no basis.
The rim ing was adjourriud at 7:50 p.m.
There will probably not be a July DHA Board meeting.
3JJ.
IBILZIN SUMSERG DUNN PRICE: & AXELROb LLP
A PARTNERSHIP OF PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS
2500 FIRST UNION FINANCIAL CENTER
200 SOUTH BISCAYNE BOULEVARD + MIAMI, FLORIDA 33131-2336
TELEPHONE: (3051 374-7580 + FAX: (305) 374-7593
E-MAIL: INFOORILZIN.COM
ONE EAST BROWARD BOULEVARD + SUITE 700
A. Vicky Garcia -Toledo, Esq. FORT LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA 33301
Direct Dial. 305-350-2409 TELEPHONE: (964) 356-0030 + FAX: (954) 356-0406
E-Mail: vleivaLbilz/n.corn
November 9, 1999
Jeff Bass, Esquire
Shubin & Bass, P.A.
46 Southwest First Street
Miami, Florida 33130
Re: MUSP for Brickell Bay Village: Confidential Settlem nt Related
Correspondence and Shall Not Be Used For Any Other Purpose or
Introduced in any Proceeding
Dear Jeff:
This letter will serve to communicate and confirm the settlement offer presented to
your clients by Pointe Development Corporation regarding the Brickell Bay Village proje
The terms are as follows, the applicant shall; (i) reduce the size ¢'f%tildin
359 residential units; (ii) lower the building as designed and revised in 1999 by four
levels; (iii) the parking will be reduced to satisfy the 359 residential its pursuant to the
City Code which will be approximately 5 Pt parking spaces; (iv) the parking will be located
on two above grade parking levels and below grade parking levels; (v) the building will
be bu' pursuant to the revised design sub tted by Wolfberg Alvarez Architects and dated
e 1999; (vi) the applicant will withdraw a reqest for FAR Bonus under the Low
Income Housing Trust Fund.
inIn exchange, the Bristol Condominium 1AP8 ation shall:(i) approve and sign a
rmal resolution from the Bristol Condominium Association in support of the Brickell Bay
u Village project; (ii) recommend to the Brickell Homeowners' Association that they issue a
resolution in support of the Brickell Bay Village project; (iii) the Bristol Condominium
Association shall be represented at the City Commission meetings by its legal counsel or
president who shall present the formal resolution of the condominium association to the
City Commission in support of the project.
Further, and as part of these negotiations, the applicant and project developer agree
to support the Bristol Condominium Association in their efforts to fill that portion of the
)lubrn1L""E: i into i"Wit
G:\DM°i\73646\ 1134210267109.01 i?
II/9/1999 fnC7,{j hi com*1;_`!-j::;- i 9lviil`1
itom Pz:i�l
BILZIN SUMBEFtG DUNN Ppubt & AXELROD LLP
Jeff Bass, Esq.
November 10, 1999
Page 2
waterfront directly adjacent and behind the Brickell condominium in an amount equal to
and the same as the Brickell Bay Village property.
Please note that this letter is protected communication between the parties until
such time as it is approved and agreed to by the undersigned and once executed by both
parties its contents will be made part of the public records at the City of Miami.
By: Michael Baumann, President
The Bristol�Cond nium ssociation) Lae,
By: its President t"
G ADMS\73 646\ 11342\0267109.01
11/9/1999
Vol
11/16/1999 12:06 461! JOSEPH KURST T<:_b PAGE 02
02/11/1994 13:015 3 2354 6R1;T0_ TOWE s'��M. P° V
t40V•fl�tl6 11:46 Wi MADAM
FAX NO. 305919457 P. 02102
RPUSToL TOWER CONDOMI NWM ASSOCIATION, INC.
On NAvc%W It, It", a mecting wee bind of the BrWol Tower Nndesriniuta
"ioe, lne. ("®rktol"?, Nbrr daly potted naHce, to diuves the Major Vse Spoclol
iordeit Apptlntion of Bekkell Day Villager Apartments as nv%,:4 in dovember partuMnt
tir erlfl>e+aft aetetintlow by end between the Usloil (I -Revised Project") and the
1A10106art The reviolous are sN forth in the attached correspandtnee from A. Vkk)
c3aNia•lfdfdo, goq. and executed Ay Mieboel Reueaaan an behalf of the developer.
AAter eeaskle, It di.enseloo. debate, and review of the mutter, it motion was made
aD' 11r. dW*A Karstin and sesoaded by Dr. David Adams to vpprore and accept tho
44Nad YINJOet at substantially tb• lorm doscribM in the attached carrespondaacc and
ril4eiild on the rooderinp doted Nswerober l99f, wbich farts a part of this lteaolatian.
76# O' DoMaa Mae tolled and approved by a veto a vo.
Bristol Tower Coadomniaiven Ase.cintion, Inc.
Qy; - awirls4zze_ �__ Zo
io"side
04" UU1
011,"
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE ELEVENTH
JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA IN AND
FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY
MICKY BISS AND USA EXPRESS, INC. , CASE NO.
a Florida corporation,
Plaintiffs,
VS.
COMPLAINT FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS
CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA,
a Florida municipality,
Defendant.
Plaintiffs, Micky Biss and USA Express, Inc., a Florida
corporation, through counsel, sue the defendant, City of-O Miami
Beach, Florida, a Florida municipality, and state:
Ln
PRELIMINARY STATEMENT P^•;
M.
C.
1. This is a complaint for a writ of mandamuEi:� bF a
developer, Micky Biss and USA Express, Inc. ("Biss o against the
City of Miami Beach ("City") to end the City's unwarranted and
unlawful actions that are thwarting construction of a condominium
development on Ocean Drive, within the City's Redevelopment
District. The proposed development has been repeatedly redesigned
to resolve objections from the City's Planning and Zoning Director,
Dean J. Grandin, Jr. ("Grandin"), and is now ready for issuance of
a building permit. Biss has waited for years for permission to
proceed to construct the condominium development that the City's
Design Review Board approved for the property almost six years ago.
record in CJnneciJor, witr;
Walter Foernan
City Clerk
14
:.r
raw
7
9
2. The City has not issued a building permit, and has been
engaged in a quiet, but thus far effective, campaign to prevent
Biss from obtaining a building permit for his development, while at
the same time trying to give the outward appearance that approval
is right around the corner. The City's campaign has been advanced
by Grandin, who has come up with a series of new, ad hoc and
constantly changing interpretations of the City's Zoning Ordinance
and has selectively applied these interpretations to Biss'
development. Biss has responded by agreeing to make all of the
changes to the plans that Grandin has requested in order to secure
permission for this development to proceed, while at the same time
reserving his right to challenge the most egregious of these
rulings.
3. Despite Biss' conciliatory approach, the City has
continued to withhold a building permit. With each round of
changes, Biss has incurred more costs, as detailed plans are
drafted and redrafted, has faced the prospect of lost profits, as
the building and the apartments are downsized to meet Grandin's
objections, and has lost market opportunities, as time has dragged
on without the issuance of a building permit.
4. In March of 1998, after the building plans were once
again revised to comply with all of Grandin's then most recent
interpretations and demands, Grandin came up with yet another
2
C'9-
interpretation of. the Zoning Ordinance, and concluded that based
upon that interpretation Biss' architects had calculated the
allowable floor area of the ground floor improperly. Biss
challenged the interpretation, and in the process uncovered
evidence that, in connection with other similar developments
Grandin had recently approved, Grandin had calculated the ground
floor area the very same way Biss' architects had calculated it.
After Biss confronted him with this evidence in July of 1.998,
Grandin reversed himself on that most recent objection, and since
that time, neither Grandin nor anyone else from the Zoning
Department has raised any objections to the building plans. Both
Grandin and the official who reviews plans for zoning compliance
have orally acknowledged that the building plans are in compliance
with zoning regulations. The ten other inspectors who review plans
for compliance with applicable City regulations have also reviewed
the plans and have indicated their approval of the plans in
writing. Still, no building permit has been issued.
S. The City's legal department has apparently halted further
consideration of Biss' request for a building permit, but although
Biss has had discussions and negotiations with the City in order to
move the process forward, he has not been issued a building permit
nor has he been provided with written notice of the legal
department's official reason for not issuing him a building permit.
K
0
G. Based upon the C.ity's actions over the last six years,
Biss has good reason to fear that any further discussion with the
City in order to try to convince it to issue a building permit for
this development will be futile. The City seems committed to
coming up with objections and with reasons to delay consideration
of the merits of the plans, until Biss either runs out of money or
endurance or until such time as market conditions turn against
Biss.
7. Unless this Court intervenes and issues a mandamus
ordering the City to issue a building permit, this development will
remain blocked by the City.
PARTIES
8. Micky Biss is the owner of a parcel of real property
located in Miami Beach, Florida and known by the street address of
120 Ocean Drive. USA Express, Inc., a Florida corporation, is the
owner of two parcels of land located in Miami Beach known by the
street addresses of 126 Ocean Drive and 130 Ocean Drive. Micky
Biss is the president of USA Express, Inc. Micky Biss and USA
Express, Inc. are collectively referred to herein as "Biss" and the
three parcels of land, which are contiguous to each other, are
collectively referred herein to as the "Development Site".
9. The City of Miami Beach is a Florida municipality that,
pursuant to its ordinances, regulates building and zoning within
4
05- Gi
0
the city, and it is referred to herein as the "City'.
FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS
10. All conditions precedent to the bringing of this suit
have occurred or are excused.
A. Relevant Background Information
11. On July 19, 1993 Biss made a submission to the City
describing a building to be built on the Development Site. The
submission consisted of a set of architectural plans, along with
other required documents and exhibits.
12. Biss requested Design Review Board approval for a
building consisting of residential apartments, parking spaces,
recreational facilities to accommodate the residential apartments
and ground floor retail/restaurant space. This submission received
Design Review Board File No. 4188. This building was referred to on
the architectural plans and on all subsequent submissions to the
City as Biss Tower East ("Biss Tower").
13. The architectural firm that designed the proposed
building and created the plans was and is Arquitectonica.
14. Biss Tower was submitted to the City pursuant to, and is
subject to, the City's Zoning Ordinance 89-2665 as it was in effect
on the date of submission. ("Effective Zoning Ordinance"). The
Effective Zoning Ordinance allowed for Biss Tower to have a maximum
floor area of 43,875 square feet ("Allowed Floor Area").
5
OEM
CID
15. In calculating this Allowed Floor. Area, Arquitectonica
did not include certain areas of the building which it believed
that it could exclude from the calculation of countable floor area
pursuant to Section 3-2(A)(79) of the Effective Zoning Ordinance,
which allows certain areas of buildings to be excluded from floor
area calculations. However, Dean J. Grandin, Jr. ("Grandin"), the
Planning and Zoning Director, disagreed. He reviewed the
submission and wrote a memo to Harry Mavrogenes, ("Mavrogenes")
Director, Development, Design and Historic Preservation Services
Department, dated August 6, 1993 (a copy of which is attached as
Exhibit A), which stated that because Arquitectonica did not
include three types of areas of the building when calculating the
floor area, the building exceeded the Allowed Floor Area. These
areas are referred to hereinafter as the "Areas in Dispute".
16. In his August 6, 1993 memo to Mavrogenes, Grandin
suggested that Biss proceed before the Design Review Board with the
plans as submitted, and that subsequent changes to the plans to
address the floor area issues could be done at staff level.
17. On August 10, 1993 Biss received Design Review Board
Approval for Biss Tower. This approval is still valid and in
effect today. The approval of Biss Tower by the Design Review
Board did not resolve the matter of the Areas in Dispute.
18. On October 14, 1993, Biss submitted to the City three
rn
professional written opinions stating that the Effective Zoning
Ordinance did not require the Areas in Dispute to be included in
the floor area calculation. The three professional written
opinions were from: Lester Goldstein, Esq., a land use attorney
then with the law firm of Fine, Jacobson, et al,; Carter McDowell,
Esq., a land use attorney then with the law firm of Fine, Jacobson,
et al; and Professor Jean -Francois LeJeune from the University of
Miami School of Architecture.
19. On October 19, 1993, Grandin provided a formal written
response to the three professional opinions, a copy of which is
attached as Exhibit B. This was Grandin,s second formal review and
written opinion on the floor area of the development.
20. On Friday, November 19, 1993 Grandin met with Biss and
Jud Kurlancheek ("Kurlancheek") to discuss the Areas in Dispute.
Kurlancheek was the City's Planning and Zoning Director immediately
prior to Grandin. During the meeting on November 19, 1993
Kurlancheek told Grandin that he did not agree with Grandin's
interpretation of the Effective Zoning Ordinance regarding the
Areas in Dispute and that according to Kurlancheek's interpretation
of the Effective Zoning Ordinance, these areas did not have to be
included in the floor area calculation.
21. At the conclusion of the meeting between Grandin, Biss
and Kurlancheek, Grandin told Biss and Kurlancheek that he would
r�
reverse his position on one of the three Areas in Dispute and not
require that area to be included in the floor area calculation, and
that he would compromise on a second area by only requiring part of
that area to be included in the floor area calculation and that he
would reserve decision on the third area until after the weekend.
22. On Tuesday, November 23, 1993 Biss spoke to Grandin by
telephone and Grandin informed Biss that he would not agree that
the third area could be excluded from the floor area calculation
but would stick to the compromise position he outlined during the
meeting on November 19th, and would not require the inclusion of
one of the three areas and would only require the inclusion of part
of the other area in the floor area calculation. Grandin
characterized his final position as a compromise since he was
reversing himself on 1 % of the three Areas in Dispute.
23. On Wednesday, November 24, 1993, Biss hand delivered a
letter to Grandin's office summarizing Grandin's compromise
regarding the Areas in Dispute and Biss requested that Grandin
confirm this compromise position in writing. A copy of this letter
is attached as Exhibit C.
24. On November 29,1993, Biss and Nancy Lynk, a member of
Biss' staff, met with Grandin to request a written response to
Biss' November 24th letter. Grandin stated that he would not put
anything in writing but shook hands with Biss and said that he
0
would not go back on his word and that the information contained in
Biss' November 24th letter regarding Grandin's position was
correct.
25. Nevertheless, in January, 1994, Grandin informed Biss
that all compromises were off and that Grandin was reverting to his
initial position that a.11 the Areas in Dispute had to once again be
included in the floor area calculation. Grandin put this revised
and official position in writing in the form of his Administrative
Decision dated June 16, 1994, a copy of which is attached as
Exhibit D.
26. On July 13, 1994, Biss filed an Appeal to the Zoning
Board of Adjustment ("ZBA") of Grandin's Administrative Decision
regarding these Areas in Dispute.
27. In July of 1994, Biss submitted a complete set of
building plans to the City which included: detailed architectural
plans, structural engineering plans, civil engineering plans,
mechanical engineering plans and landscaping plans ("First Set of
Building Plans"). This First Set of Building Plans complied with
Grandin's Administrative Decision by including all of the Areas in
Dispute in the floor area calculation, thereby reducing the number
of apartment units and the size of the apartment units and the
square footage of the ground floor retail/restaurant space,
accordingly.
0
28. Biss was proceeding to obtain a building permit for the
First Set of Building Plans, with the understanding that if he
subsequently prevailed in his Appeal of Grandin's Administrative
Decision by obtaining a ruling that all or some of the Areas in
Dispute did not have to be included in the floor area calculation,
then he would have the right to revise the building plans by
increasing the floor area and obtaining an amended building permit.
29. All of the City inspectors responsible for reviewing
building plans, including the Zoning Department inspector, reviewed
this First Set of Building Plans during the month of July, 1994.
All of the city inspectors responsible for reviewing building
plans, except the Zoning Department inspector, approved and signed
off on this First Set of Building Plans during the month of July,
1994. A copy of those approvals are attached as Exhibit E.
30. Grandin reduced to writing his reasons for the Zoning
Department not approving this First Set of Building Plans in a
letter dated July 26, 1994 which was faxed to Arquitectonica. This
July 26, 1994 letter, a copy of which is attached as Exhibit F,
stated six reasons why the First Set of Building Plans were not in
compliance with the Effective Zoning Ordinance.
31. One of the stated reasons was that Grandin again claimed,
on grounds not previously raised, that Biss Tower had an excess in
floor area. This new objection was in addition to the objections
10
that had led to the Areas in Dispute. This objection resulted from
Grandin's position that still more areas of the building had to
also be included in the floor area calculation. These additional
areas are referred to hereinafter as "Additional Areas in Dispute".
32. During the twelve month period preceding Grandin's July
26, 1994 letter to Arquitectonica, Grandin had reviewed the
architectural plans for the building on multiple occasions with
particular attention to matters regarding to the floor area
calculation. During the twelve month period preceding Grandin's
July 26, 1994 letter to Arquitectonica, Grandin had rendered three
written opinions, including an official Administrative Decision,
regarding matters pertaining to the floor area calculation of the
building (see Exhibits A, B and D). During the twelve month period
preceding Grandin's July 26, 1994 letter to Arquitectonica, Grandin
had not informed Biss or Arquitectonica that any of the Additional
Areas in Dispute had to be included in the floor area calculation.
During the twelve month period preceding Grandin's July 26, 1994
letter to Arquitectonica, none of Grandin's three prior written
opinions regarding floor area calculation mentioned that any of the
Additional Areas in Dispute had to be included in the floor area
calculation.
33. At that time, Biss and Arquitectonica were willing to
make five of the six changes to resolve Grandin's objections.
11
09-.
However, in order to resolve the sixth objection, which related to
the floor area calculation, Arquitectonica and Biss would have to
once again substantially reduce the size of the building and the
apartment units. At the time, they were unwilling to do that.
Therefore, Arquitectonica and Biss could not comply with Grandin's
floor area objection at that time.
34. Without the Zoning Department approval and the Zoning
Department inspector signing off on the First Set of Building
Plans, Biss was unable able to obtain a building permit with the
First Set of Building Plans.
35. After Grandin would not allow the Zoning Department to
approve and sign off on the First Set of Building Plans, Biss
requested that Grandin put his most recent objections regarding the
Additional Areas in Dispute into the form of another Administrative
Decision. On November 29, 1994 Grandin issued a second official
Administrative Decision on Biss Tower regarding matters dealing
with the floor area calculation of Biss Tower, a copy of which is
attached as Exhibit G.
36. On December 23, 1994 Biss filed with the ZBA an Amended
Appeal of Grandin's two Administrative Decisions regarding all
matters dealing with the floor area calculation: Areas in Dispute
addressed initially in Grandin's first Administrative Decision
dated June 16, 1994 and Additional Areas in Dispute, addressed in
12
r. 0111)
C117
Grandin's second Administrative Decision dated November 29, 1994.
37. This Amended Appeal has not yet been heard and is still
pending before the ZBA. According to applicable requirements,
after receiving Design Review Board approval for Biss Tower on
August 10, 1993, Biss had one year to obtain a building permit.
When Biss filed the Appeal of Grandin's Administrative Decision to
the ZBA on July 13, 1994, the remaining time to obtain the building
permit was stayed. On February 7, 1995 Biss received from the
Design Review Board a 90 day extension on the time remaining from
the one year. This gave Biss a total of 128 days on the time
remaining from the one year. On June 7, 1995 Sandra Schneider,
First Assistant City Attorney, gave Biss a letter which is attached
as Exhibit H. The letter confirms that the 128 day time for
obtaining the building permit will not begin to run until after the
ZBA's disposition of the appeal of Grandin's Administrative
Decisions, and if the ZBA decision is then challenged in court,
until issuance of a mandate by the highest court to hear the
matter. Schneider stated in her letter that she based her opinion
on Section 16-8 of the Zoning Ordinance.
B. The Present Controversy
38. On November 14, 1997 Arquitectonica's principal, Bernardo
Fort -Brescia, and Arquitectonica's project manager, Louis St.
Clair, met with Grandin concerning this project. During this
13
a " - 961
at.;
meeting, Arquitectonica showed Grandin a revised set of
architectural plans for Biss Tower that once again reduced the
square footage of the apartments and the square footage of the
ground floor retail/restaurant space, this time enough to enable
the inclusion of all the Additional Areas in Dispute, as well as
the original Areas in Dispute in the floor area calculation. This
revised set of plans also resolved all of the other concerns and
objections raised by Grandin in his July 26, 1994 letter to
Arquitectonica.
39. During the November 14, 1997 meeting, Grandin confirmed
to Arquitectonica that all of his previously articulated concerns
and objections which did not allow him to sign off on the plans in
1994, including the inclusion of the Areas in Dispute and the
Additional Areas in Dispute in the floor area calculation, had now
been addressed and satisfactorily resolved.
40. However, during the November 14, 1997 meeting, Grandin
raised additional concerns, and requested some additional changes
and made some suggestions regarding further changes. After the
November 14,1997 meeting Arquitectonica sent a letter dated
December 3,1997 to Grandin, a copy of which is attached as Exhibit
I, in which Arquitectonica informed Grandin that Biss had agreed to
allow Arquitectonica to once again revise the plans to accommodate
all of the additional concerns, requests and suggestions that
14
Grandin raised during the November 14, 1997 meeting. In the
December 3, 1997 letter, Arquitectonica outlined all of the further
revisions that were going to be made to the plans to address the
concerns, requests and suggestions raised by Grandin during the
November 14,1997 meeting. In the December 3, 1997 letter,
Arquitectonica also informed Grandin that it would now be
proceeding to finalize all of the plans relative to Biss Tower to
present to Grandin for his .final zoning approval.
41. Grandin verbally acknowledged his receipt and review of
Arquitectonica's December 3, 1997 letter and that he understood
that Arquitectonica and Biss were now going to proceed to finalize
all of the plans. As the Planning and Zoning Director, Grandin had
to understand that proceeding to finalize all of the plans would
involve the expenditure of substantial additional time and expense.
42. On March 23, 1998 Bernardo Fort -Brescia and Louis St.
Clair from Arquitectonica again met again with Grandin. The
purpose of the meeting was to review all the final changes to the
plans for Biss Tower pursuant to Arquitectonica's December 3, 1997
letter to Grandin. During this March 23, 1998 meeting, Grandin
confirmed that all of his prior objections and concerns had now
been addressed and satisfactorily resolved on the revised plans
which were presented to him at this March 23, 1998 meeting.
43. However, during this March 23, 1998 meeting, Grandin
15
informed Arquitectonica that he still could not provide Zoning
Department approval of the plans because of three new issues
Grandin raised during the meeting. One of Grandin's new objections
was that the floor area of the building still exceeded the Allowed
Floor Area due to the fact that Arquitectonica had calculated the
floor area of the first floor at 50% of its actual square footage.
This calculation was based upon the Effective Zoning Ordinance
which, like the current Zoning Ordinance, states, in the Floor Area
definition section, that the total Floor Area of a building shall
include only half of the Floor Area that is located below grade if
the ceiling of that floor is above grade. Biss Tower's plans have
always shown the first floor of the building at a few inches below
grade and the ceiling of that floor above grade. Therefore,
pursuant to the Effective Zoning Ordinance, Arquitectonica had
properly calculated the floor area of the first floor at half of
the actual square footage.
44. Grandin had withheld this objection until after the new
set of final plans had been drafted, even though he knew or should
have known about this calculation for years. All the Biss Tower
plans that Grandin reviewed in past years had always clearly
indicated that the first floor was a few inches below grade, and
showed that the floor area of that floor was being calculated at
50% as a result. Grandin had examined this project specifically
16
t
for Allowed Floor Area on many occasions. He had previously
written five formal opinions on the floor area of the building.
None of those opinions raised this objection.
45. The plans Grandin had previously reviewed could not have
been clearer. The First Set Of Building Plans, submitted in 1994,
show the first floor (also called the ground level) on page A1.2
where it is stated, in large bold words, "GROSS FLOOR AREA: 6,188
S.F. - GROUND LEVEL (BELOW SIDEWALK ELEVATION) - (50%) - 3,094
S.F." Also, on the front page of those plans, in the Area
Tabulation section, the plans clearly indicate that the Ground
Floor Level gross floor area is 6,188 S.F. and that the architect
used a 50% factor (3,094 S.F.) in calculating the total Allowed
Floor Area of the building. A copy of these two portions of the
plans clearly showing this is attached as Exhibit J.
46. Nevertheless, Grandin waited until the March 23, 1998
meeting to opine that in order for a 50% calculation to be used for
the first floor, the volumetric space of the first floor would have
to be 50% below grade. In this case, that interpretation would
have required the retail and restaurant space on the first floor,
as well as the entrance of the building, to be approximately six
feet below grade. That was obviously not a feasible design,
especially on Ocean Drive, which is literally across the street
from the Atlantic Ocean. Thus, the only feasible way to comply
17
S 061 3
�' +
with this new interpretation would have been to once again
eliminate substantial additional floor area from the building.
This would have landed yet another blow to the economic viability
of the development, the third in a series of such blows from
Grandin's decisions on floor area calculations, made piecemeal over
the years.
47. There was no legal basis for the Grandin interpretation,
which was that: "The Department believes, it is the intent of the
ordinance that at least half of the volume of the floor should be
below grade (sidewalk elevation in this instance) in order for only
half of the area to be counted in the FAR calculations." The
requirement that half the volumetric space of the ground floor be
below grade is not in the ordinance, it was simply made up to
further delay and weaken the economic viability of this
development. That is clear from the text of the ordinance that
Grandin was interpreting, which states that the: "Floor Area of a
Building shall not include Floor Area located below Grade, however,
if the ceiling is above Grade, % of the Floor Area that is below
Grade shall be included in the Floor Area Ratio calculation." The
50% of volumetric space below grade requirement is nowhere to be
found. Indeed, there is no mention of volumetric space in the
ordinance at all.
48. The Grandin interpretation was also contrary to public
f.]
IS9- 0 G i
Policy, because it would require developers to build far below
grade in order to take advantage of the 50% floor area calculation,
and that is not activity that the government should encourage on a
barrier island.
49. At that time, in March of 1998, Biss was also in the
process of obtaining Design Review approval for an office building
to be located at 11.9 Washington Avenue ("Office Building").
Grandin's interpretation regarding the first floor area calculation
also affected the Office Building. Biss requested, through
counsel, that Grandin provide Biss with an official Administrative
Decision regarding this first floor area calculation in connection
with the Washington Avenue Office Building so he could challenge
that interpretation. On May 26, 1998, Grandin provided Biss'
counsel with an Administrative Decision, a copy of which is
attached as Exhibit K, in which he stated that in order for the
first floor of a building to be calculated at 50% of floor area,
the volumetric space of the first floor has to be at least 50%
below grade. In this letter, Grandin also stated that this
interpretation had consistently been the Department's
interpretation of the Zoning Ordinance on this matter. On May 26,
1998 Biss filed an appeal to the ZBA of Grandin's May 26, 1998
Administrative Decision on the Office Building. This Appeal was
scheduled to be heard by the ZBA in August, 1998.
19
v ` 961
®R
50. In July, 1998, Biss discovered that the Zoning Department
had not in fact interpreted the Zoning Ordinance concerning the
below grade floor area calculation in the manner that Grandin had
stated in his Administrative Decision. Prior to the scheduled ZBA
hearing, Biss confronted Grandin with evidence demonstrating that
Grandin had allowed other architects and developers in the City to
use the same 50% calculation for the first floor that
Arquitectonica had used. In none of those cases had the volumetric
space of the first floor been at least 50% below grade as Grandin
was requiring with both Biss' developments, Biss Tower and Biss'
Washington Avenue Office Building. After Biss produced this
evidence to Grandin, Grandin reversed his position, as is evidenced
in his letter addressed to Stephen T. Maher, Esq., dated Jul 15
Y ,
1998, a copy of which is attached as Exhibit L. Grandin's Jul
15th letter resolved this issue for both the Washington AvenueY
Office Building and Biss Tower, and Biss withdrew his ZBA appeal on
that issue.
51. Prior to this first floor area calculation matter being
resolved, on June 8, 1998 Arquitectonica re -submitted another
revised set of plans for Biss Tower to the Zoning Department. On
this June 8, 1998 submission
Arquitectonica dealt with, and
satisfactorily resolved, the other two new issues Grandin raised
during the March 23, 1998 meeting that did not involve floor area
20
Arquitectonica addressed the floor area issue, which was then under
appeal to the ZBA, by providing two options. Option 1 showed the
first floor at a 50% calculation (to be used if Biss prevailed on
the pending appeal) and Option 2 showed the first floor with at a
100% calculation with a corresponding reduction of actual floor
area in the building (to be used in the event Biss did not prevail
on the pending appeal). Arquitectonica's June 8, 1998 re-
submission of the revised plans was accompanied by a cover letter
explaining the further modifications made to accommodate Grandin's
latest objections, and explaining Option 1 and Option 2. A copy of
this letter is attached as Exhibit M.
52. On June 8, 1998, the plans and cover letter were
presented in person by Arquitectonica and Biss to Armando Valdes
("Valdes"), the zoning inspector for the Zoning Department who
ordinarily reviews plans. At that time, Valdes reviewed the plans
with Louis St. Clair from Arquitectonica and Valdes indicated that
everything had now been satisfactorily revised and that the plans
were now in zoning compliance. Notwithstanding that fact, he would
not sign off on the plans as requested by Biss and Louis St. Clair.
53. On Thursday, June 11, 1998 Biss spoke with Valdes in the
office of the Zoning Department at which time Valdes confirmed to
Biss that he had reviewed the plans more closely and reconfirmed to
Biss that the plans were now in compliance with the Effective
21
{ , ZA)
Zoning Ordinance but that he could still not sign off on the plans.
On Monday, June 15, 1998 Biss, accompanied by Nancy Lynk, met with
Valdes in the Zoning Department Office. During this meeting Valdes
reconfirmed again that the plans were now in compliance with zoning
but, that he was told not to sign off. He also indicated that there
was going to be a special meeting on this matter with staff members
and a member of the City,s legal department.
54. After receiving verbal assurances from the Zoning
Department that the plans were finally in compliance, over the next
four months Biss once again proceeded to have a new and completely
revised set of building plans prepared which included: revised
detailed architectural plans, revised structural engineering plans,
revised civil engineering plans, revised mechanical engineering
plans and revised landscaping plans ("Second Set of Building
Plans") .
55. These plans were designed to be the final plans. They
took months to prepare, and they required the coordinated efforts
of Arquitectonica and four other engineering firms. The structural
engineering firm had to create a new set of structural drawings.
The mechanical engineering firm had to use electrical engineers to
create a new set of electrical plans, plumbing engineers to create
a new set of plumbing plans and mechanical engineers to create a
new set of air conditioning and other mechanical plans. The civil
22
engineering firm had to create a new set of plans to properly
provide for City water, sewer and drainage. The landscaping
engineers had to provide new plans that would conform to all the
architectural and engineering specifications and would comply with
the all landscaping requirements. In addition, Arquitectonica had
to create final detailed architectural plans with precisely
detailed building specifications. While working on the plans,
these engineers and architects had to develop drawings, meet with
inspectors and other City personnel to get information and obtain
feedback, accommodate requests for changes and modifications, and
finalize the plans.
56. Eleven City inspectors must review and approve the plans
before a building permit will be issued. One of these inspectors
is the Zoning Department inspector. By October, 1998, ten of the
eleven inspectors had reviewed the Second Set of Building Plans and
had found that they complied with applicable legal requirements.
Biss wanted them to indicate their written approval on the plans,
as is the custom, but the City's legal department forbade that.
Instead, each inspector signed off on a sheet of paper, and a copy
of that document is attached as Exhibit N. The sign offs were in
the same form that would have been used had sign offs been placed
on the plans. These sign offs indicate the inspectors final
approval of the plans. Even though both Grandin and Valdes, the
23
09
zoning inspector, approved the plans in both .Tune and October,
1998, both refuse to provide written zoning approval (the eleventh
approval) of the Second Set of Building Plans.
57. The City's legal department- has apparently halted further
consideration of Biss' request for a building permit. Although
Biss has had discussions and negotiations with the City in order to
move the process forward, he has not been issued a building permit
nor has he been provided written notice of the legal department's
official reason for not issuing a building permit.
58. As a result of the City's actions between 1993 and the
present time, it has become clear to Biss that the City has been
engaged in a quiet but thus far effective campaign to prevent Biss
from obtaining a building permit for Biss Tower, while trying to
give the outward appearance that approval is just around the
corner. The City has, on several occasions, advanced its campaign
by coming up with new, ad hoc and constantly changing
interpretations of the Effective Zoning Ordinance and applying them
to Biss Tower. When Biss has relented and downsized his building
in order to be allowed to proceed, reserving the most egregious
objections for future resolution, new requirements have appeared.
More costs are incurred, and more potential profit is lost, with
each round of changes.
59. Biss needs relief from this Court so that he can exercise
24
his rights without further obstruction or delay.
REQUEST FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS
60. Biss has a clear legal right to the City's issuance of
a building permit in connection with his proposed development of
Biss Tower. He has made all the changes to his building plans that
the City has required, and has presented the City with a full and
complete set of plans that are acceptable to the City's inspectors,
as required by law.
61. The City has a clear legal duty to issue the building
permit. once Biss has made all the changes the City has required,
and has presented the City with a full and complete set of plans
that are acceptable to the City's inspectors, it may not refuse to
allow Biss to pull a building permit.
62. The City continues to withhold a building permit, even
though Biss has made every change to his building plans that the
City has required him to make and has satisfied every City
inspector who examines and approves such plans.
63. The City will continue to delay this project without
legal justification unless this Court intervenes.
64. Biss has no adequate remedy at law to prevent the City
from continuing to withhold the building permit he is clearly
entitled to receive and that the City is duty bound to issue. His
only hope for relief lies in this Court's issuance of the requested
25
09 t
a
writ of mandamus.
WHEREFORE Biss requests that this Court issue a writ of
mandamus directed to the City of Miami Beach as follows:
A. Issue an Alternative Writ of Mandamus immediately upon an
ex parte review of this Complaint, pursuant to Florida Rule of
Civil Procedure 1.630 and Moore v. Ake, 693 So.2d 697 (Fla. 2d DCA
1997), which states that ,the trial court had an obligation under
Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.630 to review [the plaintiff's]
complaint when it was filed, decide whether it established a prima
facie case, and issue an alternate writ of mandamus if the petition
was facially adequate." The Court went on to explain that this
process occurs before the service is made. This Complaint states
a prima facie case for mandamus. Mandamus lies against a City to
compel issuance of a building permit. City of Miami Beach v State
x rel. Fountainhleu Ro . _l Corp., 108 So.2d 614 (Fla. 3d DCA 1959) .
To be entitled to mandamus, a party must show a clear legal .right
to performance of the act requested, an indisputable legal duty,
and no adequate remedy at law. Smith v. State, 696 So.2d 814 (Fla.
2d DCA 1997). The allegations in this Complaint meet that standard.
B. Issue a Peremptory Writ of Mandamus requiring the City to
issue a building permit for Biss Tower;
C. Order an expedited proceeding so that the loss of further
time and money will be kept to a minimum;
Q:
D. Order a trial by jury;
E. Order the City to pay the costs of this action and order
such other relief as is just and proper.
Respectfully Submitted,
Stephen/JT. Maher, P.A.
By. StdqDhen T. Maher, Esq.
Flo ida Bar Number 200859
201 South Biscayne Blvd.
Suite 1500
Miami, FL 33131
(305) 375-0085
fax(305)375-0095
MA
S9- �61
01 ,xt`u`r
The National
164
a�
,O:
0
he Atlantis on Brickell Avenue makes you think that
Arquitectonica looked over the whole history of archi-
tecture and decided it was time to have some fun, In
this bright, colorful, and intriguing design, the main attraction is
Atlantis's astonishing sight gag: a 37-foot-square hole punched
out of its mirrored walls. The audacious see -through cutout
frames an exotic, bright -red spiral staircase, vivid yellow walls,
and a gigantic palm tree hovering many stories in the air.
On either side of the "skycourt," the building's fagades are different in design but unified by
bright colors and a bold graphic look. Along Brickell Avenue, the center hole is visually balanced
by a big red triangle on the roof to the right, and by four bright -yellow triangular balconies extend-
ing from the mirrored wall to the lower left. At ground level, the main entry is defined by four large
red columns under a canopy; a matching set of columns reappears just inside the lobby doors.
The opposite side of the building attracts attention with a giant -scale brilliant blue -painted
stucco grid superimposed over a smaller, light gray grid of balconies and railings. On this side
observers also discover the fate of the "missing" hole: it appears to have landed by the tennis
courts, a 37-foot yellow cube housing an exercise room and squash courts.
There are twenty floors of apartments in Atlantis, ninety apartments and six duplexes. Four of
the floors open onto the surreal
skycourt, with a whirlpool, a hot4.
tub, and a spectacular view.
Y
The lighthearted but sophis-
ticated quality of Atlantis seta
new style for Miami Beach. Atl r
the time Atlantis opened, ArquibA�y.
tectonica's principals—Laurinda
Spear, Bernardo Fort -Brescia,
and Hervin Romney —were in
their thirties, and their relatively
youthful success made almost as
many headlines as the building.
On their follow-up commissions
along Brickell Avenue, Arquitec-
tonica continued the colorful
Atlantis themes. '
For visitor information, call
(305) 285-1269.
FC 017
i
A AM
,W.W�i
The In(orT»adon Management Company
305-477-9149 0 800-287-4799 0 FAX 305-477-7526
^vim' �jr'i
_l
I.J C it \ I it 307
Arquitectbnica, The Atlantis,
Miami, Florid& 1980-82. Photo
by Norman McGimth
U6
Ol 1
E
Arquifectonim
The Atlantis., Apartmentblock in Miami,
Florida, 1979-1982
Ansicht der Sudselte
Foto Norman McGrath
Dos ochizehnstackige Hous on der Biscayne
Bay ist —vie von der Bouordnung vorgege-
ben— eine schmale Scheibe. Die vaitere
Ausorbeitung dieses kloren stereometrischen
Orpers ist typish fpr die Architektur von
Arquitectonico: Die Ostseite ist gerundet,
zMschen den Ldngsfassaden ist ein vier Eta.
gen hopes Quadrat nousgestanee, geome-
irische Zeichen in kraftigen Forben sind an
die Front and auf dos Doch gesetzt. Sie ma-
chen ous einem wirtschaftGch kolkulienen
Bou einen Wohnort mit sGdlichem Charme;
die Nomensgebung unterstreicht den An-
spmch out Identitat.
eunten Stock
McGrath
gerzonen in Manhattan nach wie vor nicht vorgesehen, aber vor dem Hintergrund Gesamtonsichtdes .Atlontis.
der zunehmenden Konkurrenz von fliefiendem Verkehr and Passanten um den Stra- Ft. Norman McGrath
Benroum wird der Bewegungsfreiheit der Fufiganger neue Bedeutung zugemessen.
Der dem Publikum zugangliche Roum tritt als Wintergarten, Ladenpossoge oder
geschutzter FuBweg in die Gebaude ein. Die Architekten reagieren darauf mitArka-
den, grofizugigen Portolen and vorgeschobenen Sockelzonen-
Eines der Gebaude, die der neuen Vorstellung von Stadtraum nahekommen, ist dos
Verwaltungsgebaude der Humana Corporation, einen Unternehmens, dos Ge-
sundheitseinrichtungen betreibt, in Louisville, Kentucky. Michael Graves entworf
eine achtstackige »public loggias, die Privatnutzung and Publikumsverkahr verbin-
det, mit vorgelogerten Arkarden cis nTeil der Stoats. Ihre Hahe ist der, Nachbor-
hausern angepaBt, drei danlbergelegte Luftgeschosse ubemehmen die Strafien-
flucht, dahinter rogt der Buroschaft auf. Der ousgepragte Dachhelm mit auskragen-
dem Erker and Giebel zeigt eine obwechslungsreiche Auseinanderserzung mit den
Achsen, die dutch die Main Street and die querverlaufenden Avenues vorgegeben
waren. Die Grafie der eingesetzten Elemente gibt der Fassade ein beinahe anthro-
pomorphes Antlitz, ohne klassische Anleihen zu verleugnen. Gemeinsam ist vielen
vergleichboren Bauten die Vorliebe fur aufwendige Materialien, vor allem Granit,
die Betonung der Fensterousschnitte onstelle ihrer Kaschierung hinter durchloufen-
den Rastern oder Glasfldchen and die deutliche Gliederung- fj, r f'r
rm -Nwmmlwh�_
The Information Management Company
305-477-9149.800-287-4799 • FAX 305-477-7526
IS
a photocopy in poor
condition
FC 017
AIM'Am�. ' .. L .. I �, A;
, r, ' § . - A
Atlantis and Babylon,
Miami, n
Two apartment buildings by
Arquitectonica—one large,
one small —capture the aura
of their time and place.
The Atlawis, north jaCade.
Rim and famous
We all kn(r%%• ;!bout Arquituctcmict. Accounts
of the young (irm's ntc•tcori( rise over the last
five years have chronicled the process I,h
a•Itich its three principals—laurinda Spear,
Bernardo Fort-lirescia, and 1-Icrein Itottt-
ney—have• changed Ihe• face of Miami. lint
nowhere is Ibis ch;utgc• more• Stlikingh ap-
parent than on aucl around Brickell Avcnne,
a major thorour ghfare unning along Bis-
Cayne Bay. There. in eleven blocks, hot! %hill
find, from north to socttlt, the Babylon, the
Atlantis, the Imperial (under constructiot!I.
and the 11alace IP A. ,Iul\' 161hi'), thith thc•
1-Ie•1tttSle•h CCIltct' to follwv soon !opposite the
liahylo!!t. Chtt of this impressive concen-
tration of huilcdings, the note consider the At-
lantis (on this aat(l follmhing pages) and the
Babylon (page 106l, PiA Award thinners in
1980 and 1978, respec6vcl}'.
For slicer shock value, the Atlantis on Brick -
ell is hard to beau. I)rit•ing south along the
ahenuc, you arc• confronted thith the fantastic
sight of a reflective glass bt ildiug that has a
red triangle on its top, four yelloth triangles
0 q" � 1) 1
4
99
C,
L
�tES-
9ECMT?N - O
Al
01
01
WING
.....---...._...-__._..._-.____..____._.--_____.
'7e —Mr, plan fright), the
+�.. :n' column conceals a
rzhm e stark. and the two col-
!, back of the space he-
t==----:
ton scat. The giant round
mn. 1,vefeet across, is o
the Ctta'117g SrLl(atl'
and fauntain. Thrfour red--_-_---_��-- -
rn>+:. +asidr the lobos' mirror
under tile entrance
It -nhrmn of each rate for
rs r,, rstructural. In the car.
t7ro columns form a .square
chat frnmes more seating,
tlr. roared poch> wall cor,-
thr trash compactor chute.
[[77771
� h �
�oeer rN-tnwa r � — T
+arr�
laid averthe predomina»tly
gray grid doffloorstabs and beat -
cony railings: on the ground
floor are the private patios of the
six dupkx'Yownhotse Part.
menu. The mystery ofthesquare
hole(shycourt) is solved by the
Presence of the 37 foot cube
(left). with its yellow side (match-
ing the yellow wall of the
skytourt), which is meant to read
as the solid that has been punched
out of the building and has
landed not farfron, the tennis
court. The cube houses a squash
court and eterrue room.
An axonometric of the original
design shows the Atlantis span-
ning the larger of two etisling
houses (the smaller one is now the
meetinghouse), before new .et -
back regulation pulled the built_
ing back another?{ feet, res'tdt-
ing in the rlemnlition of the large
house. The blue grid would have
projected well beyond the coach
side of the building. The red
triangle on the roof appears here
in marble: the single red column
supporting the east end multi-
plied in thefinished product: and
the pool was moved, to lie more or
less parallel to the shoretine.
b
_tlantis and ;Babylon
'lie blue grid's overlay is best
'en from the east end (top),
here, inside, continuous g(a:
!g offers a u�ieu, of the bay (mid-
ge). The drtplex apartments on
re i rmind floor allowed f or
ouble-height corridors off the
rhby (bottom).
In the skycourttfacing pace,
rp), a red spiral stair affords ac-
ss from f our apartments, rs
'rll as .spectacular vie-ucs as it
lntiletyers out beyond the bttild-
ig s north f nce. The yellow' mall
ppositrrfncing page, bottoin)
'r ves a.s the backdrop j'ror hot tub
nt1 whirlpool in this outdoor
porn with a lieu'.
)ata
'rojeet:.itlantis on Brickell.
hami, Fl.
architects:.i rqu iterton icn
nternatiotal Carporrttion,
:oral Gables, Fl.
,lient: Solomon Lugar rued
.amuel Grrenberg, Developers.
.l oatreal.
site: S6.000 sglt on Brickell
Iven tar, 200 jt on Bisra1•ne Bay:
\tstinkr house on site nerd- bnt'-
ront over cornI rock f orrnatiorr:
nd rxuting typkal : r�etrttiorl
-resenved on lorrttion.
'rogram: it 0-story cor,-
iominiurn apartment Imildrng,
ontttining 90 alrnr'fillI'll tt and 6
'uplex apartinrrnt.s at brt,�r: resto-
atrrin and rrno.'rrfloll of a 191))
'tl r1grt1021' tar mv, 11) rt rnet'tirl l;
Horn: anal t:t'v-it^rl. cnreretl
structural system: 3.0" con-
rete mat: reinjiirred corlcrr e
olurrin: flat roncrete sIah.
4echanical system: central
Poling tourr.' Individual air-
randling halts.
44aior materials: painted ,tun•o
m cortcrrtr Much: dertro-
tatically painted rllu"III unl
r•amirtganti pipe roiliv,9: gray
r/gecti. r solar glaac: gray tinted
liding glass doors (see Building
llaterial_s, p. 160),
:onsullants. O'Lenry-Shafer -
:osto, landscape:,John Ross As-
ocitlies, stntcturallmechnnicall
-fail engineering; .•lrquitec-
onica, irteriors.
,eneralcontractor: Cohen-
Iger, Inc.
:osts: S1l.5 million, excluding
res.
Photography: Norman ra u
11cGrath. 0 �, _ r 0
the Ar", condominium building's status as
a local architectural wonder, whether seen
from Brickell Avenue, the elevated highway
that runs through the city, or the Ricken-
backer Causeway that connects Miami to Key
Biscayne.
A walking tour of the building begins back
on its north side, where four massive red col-
unins seem to walk up (or down) a series of
white marble steps, under a large canopy. In-
side the floors :are four identical red columns,
two of which were added by the architects, in
the interest of symmetry. The entrance lobby,
also a 37-foot cube, gives the impression that
a rather sophisticated game of building blocks
has just adjourned (see photos). A corridor
leads from either side of the lobby to the
elevators; each core serves three apartments
per floor (there are 90 apartments in all,
excluding tlue six duplex ,,townhouseti' on the
gro end floor). At the back of the lobby, a
door leads out to the deck that contains the
townhouses' private patios, the tennis court,
and the "misplaced" cube, which turns out to
house a squash court and exercise room. A
few steps to the cast are the meeting house
and pool. -rile architects preserved the exist-
ing; vegetatie;n, curving the driveway and
sloping the site in deference to century -old
banyan trees. and maintaining the lush, aver-
g;roWn quality of the site. Under the rounded
east end of the huiltlirtg (:u "nautical" refer-
ence). which is Supported by a series of sler,-
cler retl colirluus, a "veranda" opens onto the
pool deck.
-I•he wl?ite, Shingle Style meeting house
uul tlue his; huilclil-g stanul politely apart, but
this seas not ahvays intended to be the case.
The original design of the Atlantis depicted it
as spanr?ilIg the lal-ger of two existing cottages
(built in on the Tirfanv family estate),
in ;t hi�arre intersection of old and new. But
before the Atlantis began construction. a zon-
ing oT•din:uu_e was passed t•equiring; it 50-foot
setliack from the bav: the new building was
only ` 6 feet from the water. Were it pulled
hack the necessary 2.1 feet. it would land
squ:u-e1V atop the lal*ger Tiffattv house. So the
house went the way of all shingles, while the
smaller one was savcul, along; with the bridge
that connecte(1 the two. The meeting house is,
in contrast to the colorful Atlantis, a study in
black anal white. and will be furnished in
Mackintosh and HofE•n?ann. "Everything in
here is old:' explained Bernardo Fort -Brescia.
"We made no attempt to relate it to the new
building."
Back inside the Atlantis —well, not exactly
inside —the skycourt offers jaded con-
dominium dwellers just the right blend of
danger and luxury. Accessible front either
the elevators (at the 1)tit floor) or the real
stair (for tl?ose lucky four who own apart-
ments that open onto it), the skycourt houses
a hot tub anti whirlpool bath. A curved yellow
walV with a red balcony conceals mechanical/
electrical equipment. The space is almost trio
surreal to be true, with its breathtaking
views and that improbable palm tree.
What seems to be a curtain wall on the
north side of the building is not'. the construc-
tion is of concrete slabs, with aluminum slab
covers painted the same gray as the
SO,
base and the pipe railings. This creates, ac-
cording to the architects, a subtle horizontal
banding, but still allows the faSade to read as
a `glass box" grid. The structure also facili-
tates the transfer of the load of the four floors
above the void of the skycourt.
The apartments themselves, which range in
size from 1350 to 2000 square feet and in
price from $200,000 to $500.000 (for the
bayfront townhouse), are typical of the " lux-
urv" developer housing of our day: in spite of
high price tags and superficially deluxe ap-
pointments, they lack the proportions and
substance that make rooms seem truly
luxurious. This less -than -perfectionist ap-
proach is visible on the exterior as well, where
staining already mars the bright blue stucco
grid, and some slab covers are beginning to
pop off.
This is not a building that reads as a vol-
ume, except from the skycourt, or at the
rounded east end. 'rhe reflective glass surface
of the north fagade seems too liquid and too
bland for Arquitectonica's uncompromisingly
opaque planes (a chronic problem that may
also be related to the quality of construction
and materials). On the other hand. the jux-
taposition of shimmering glass surface and
cubic void is simply too seductive to ignore;
it's as if you could see through a break in a
mirror. What the Atlantis is, essentially, is a
pair of billboards sandwiched together, with a
rather spectacular hole punched through
them. It is it simple idea that works, and it
should be kept simple. The red triangle, in-
tended to address the "urban end" of the
building with its schematic "roof" shape. is
most successful as a landmark on the skyline:
as an architectural statement, it is too cute for
an otherwise glamorous design. For while the
ideas are basic and the execution less than
immaculate, the Atlantis is a quintessentially
Miami building. Arquitectonica's particular
brand of Neo-Rationalism. spiked with deliri-
ous Deco and a dash of Hollawood, couldn't
be better suited to its contest: waterfront
views, lush greenery, and lots of mortev, 'this
is the sort of architecture that is of and for its
time and place, the place being a blue-chip
strip of ;Miami property with it view straight
out of the movies (which may be why Director
Brian de Palma recently chose the building as
a location for his remake of the movie Scar -
face). The Atlantis is not so much a commen-
tary on a lifestyle as it is a manifesto for one.
in which power and privilege are taken for
granted --even by the architects, who seem to
navigate these waters with accustomed ease.
The principals of Arquitectonica quickly es-
tablished themselves as a bright, brash young
firm, whose mastery of the real-estate power
structure belies their tender years, and their
architecture shows it. So far, it isn't perfect,
but it is very, very good.
:W£RL- - _-
k rim/niamaii wwi`aii°. • .' _ .. � '
'Even .e.n®renr.ro
GNNMN---igm own low
t.ta.\.n.n ■m\n
I.nss\so\enn.n �� 1®'�o..a ��rsrr�.rn�
wool
I�.t■ .r..l I' �ii�` dx a r ry
4a■ 4i\■1 '
�SR :
4tr..i.......iiiiii ' I••t\1..\\.\\\1....
I IN
'1......\\.\\....■\■
lima
-Z Iwo
no—
... k...\
hts
apical
sdor
j
t
t�•t a agy,f •k:# \1'.r
Alg
;St
ry r
ILE
..
•trr � , Xi � {
� r j'y �, o-: •k,� � �� air'. � m 'iy 7 •A. `.�.;� e'{' �• 6'� r a !. `t s ���'�
' s r � t .y t � z'i•u'L'.^,. x ^r" { .max 3.r M a
' r t(� } t I}t ¢.c} Wit: o7u f.J2'•S,i.�,"� rY 7+ -4 t, r.x7 l } 1 N i �'-•*",",
3.` f -,t t 4�r�r� 'k i. tr'sf'y '`X a3..a��. �}�� 4'k 'T53 �i7 3� y:J,,.�, t.*rPl'q a•.. Z113c �'"�11a � 4= �4
:R, ,t �1 f� t `) i' `t' ��' t �`• �`
d r � �r�yst x *3• ts� r t t
�. � . , - � t � az:-: �..._,S.+�S:icu'� s.'�,x•G:�, C�tr '�t ....-+:�}Y r r .� F s rF �'".�N }k�� �
C",
Will
® ■
-,MIA
10-F Tropical Sperg
A youthful success in an old man's profession,
die Miami -based firm of Arquitectonica is bringing
Vp brash, unorthodox design to New York City.
he Miami architectural firm Ar-
quitectonica is a phenomenon.
an overnight success in a field
more commoniv referred to as
an old man's profession and no less an
�nOmenori for its cocksure, vibranl-
eaded by a husband and wife in
Mir earliest 30s and a decade -older
partner with big -firm production ex -
�fence, Arquiteclonica burst forth
t in the pages of magazines, garner-
Ing international attention and na-
Ral prizes with its high-spirited,
ost cartoonlike collaged schema-
tics years before the implausibly un-
d designs took concrete —and
cco—form up and down Mlaml's
ffro t yard. Brickell Avenue. In six
, an average of 40 projects a year
have come off their boards —by no
ns all o'
�t has fi
Miami and
Wes oul
LO
N
The Atlantis. aaonometrle, front elevation
Houston almost two years ago. The is the work won? With brash per -
most recent, in June, created a sistence and the willingness to design
foothold where else but in New York. as speculatively as their clients build.
Where arc the clients coming from to which also means designing very
feed their prismacolor habit? Cleverly quickl.
(suspiefousl? significantly?). from The energetically entrepreneurial
waters not generally plumbed by the talent is Bernardo Fort -Brescia. 31
aesthetically ambitious. Much of their years old, scion of a wealthy multlen-
work is for bottom-Itne conscious, in- terprise Peruvian family, product ofan
it -for -the -money speculative develop- American Its• League architectural ed-
ers--condominiums, rental office ucation (Princeton and Harvardl, and
buildings. shopping centers. And how now devoted plane -hopper. client -
THE ATLANTIS
Located on Brickell Avenue In
Miami, The Atlantis was completed
In 1982 and has 96 units in 20
stories. The 50•foot cubic hole in
the facade reappears as the missing
Piece (containing a gym, squash
common building elements
manipulated In a variety of ways:
glass grid curtain wall with the hole
punched out, a supergrid In blue
pasted on the opposite side. the
arrivat of the red triangle on top, and
71
w
0
a j;
e
r t ,
C/
f
00
7 a�t r �s� rj J t1s .. �r y
s t r s e ,. .7
�• I rr t,f F �, e � ! i - � �/fr
f,�`�•,�' ft -�"J
00" '
to �
t �: - r,
�' �j��i1E 1t# a�Sr>L t fr lFwal4 �,,• .- r'�i r` •.� J, 7. � 1 ��' / 3-�..�'
if X
j'A
g(40
f£f�fy�tp�nit.tY�7
''7n7��r':�--A
¢fr,,�.:i/tJ
� i!F`r ` "r 1 01
00
loop
�� � t�i�/� ����' •A�� r 1 i...,' 1 ''i�� �y.' Cj !r .,,,.,n Gr � � ..^." .� ir"i
,
jf
1561 Avril 1985 / 24 F
�Lin. _z'
c��,..��ix
120 WNNNNLI`�_'j
REPORTAGE
LE DISCOURS DES ARCHITECTES,
Its sont jeunes, americains, et leurs coups d'essai ont eto'
des coups de maitre : reunis au sein du groupe « Arquitec-
tonica u, Its ant 6te c I'origine de nombreuses construc-
tions, notamment a Miami, qui lour ont valu, outre de
nombreux prix, une reconnaissance Internationale.
D'origine sud-americaine, Bernardo Fort Brescia, la tren-
taine, dirlge actuellement le groups avec so femme Lau-
rinda Spear. 11 nous livre les secrets de cette reussite
exceptionnelle.
CI-dessus:to piscine
Pouvez-vous nous raconter I'»his-
du • Palace -vue du
toire » d'Arquitectonica ?
38 bme Etoge.
CI-dessous : le front de
merdeMlamlavec
B.FB.: Tout a commence en 1977.
I'Impgrlal6gauche of
Nous etions jeunes d la sortie de
le Palace b drolte.
En hour 6droite,
grandes ecoles d'architecture ameri- j
conlreplongBeSurle
coines, telies que Harvard. Columbia
pignon de I'ImpBrlal.
et MIT Nous avons decide de creer le
groupe Arqu/eclonca(mot espagnol
pour architectural) atin de transformer
- radicalement - le paysage urbain
de Miami, marque olors par les
constructions de Morris Lapidus (Hotel
Fontainebleau, etc;).
Deux d'entre nous sont partis en 1979
et Hervin A.R Rommey un des princt-
paux fondateurs, s'est egalement se -
pare du groupe en 1984 ofin de creer
so propre agence. C'est malntenant
ma femme et moi qui dirigeons le
groupe. Nous avons d'abord beau-
{ loup construit b Miami (le Palace,
�cl VAtlantis. BobVlone et autres). Nous
avons maintenant des projets de
grande envergure a Houston, New
V. I, ni I ne
Pouvez-vous nous donner quel-
ques details au sulet du fonction-
nement, de la structure et des
operations d'Arquitectonica ?
B.F.B : Nous avons en fait 4 bureaux, 1
d New York, 1 a Houston et 1 a Los
Angeles, Ces 3 bureaux s'occupent
de la realisation des plans d'execu-
bon ainsi que de la surveillance des
chantiers locaux. Le quatrieme, celui
de Miami est le bureau central. Au
total nous somrnes 30.
Contralrement aux grandes agences
d'architecture americoines, ou le tra-
vail est partage suivant des equipes
de conception et de realisation, tou-
tes les decisions, notamment celles de
la creation, sont prises par ma femme
et moi-meme. ict b Miami, le plus
souvent les week -ends ou le scir.
L'ovontoge de travoiller a deux, per -
met une critique permonente faite par
I'un ou I'autre d'entre nous, ainsi
qu'une prise de decision ropide.
En dehors de celo, ma femme s'oc-
cupe de ('organisation administrative
du bureau et moi, de tout ce qui
concerne les relations publiques,
c'est-d-dire les contacts avec les
0
a
FONIGUES
dents, to pr6sentation et to vente des
fferents projets que nous traltons.
uet est le d6roulement d'une
urnge de travail ?
®F.B.: En ggn(5ral, beoucoup de d&-
placements, voyages le )our entre
,ew York et Houston avec presento-
n des projets oux differents clients
ainsi qu'une prise de connalssance
ouide des dlfferents chantlers en
rs. Retour le soft 6 Miami.
s clients principaux sont-ils du
ecteur public ou pr1v6 ?
N.F.B.: Lots de nos debuts, nous ovions
concentre tous nos efforts dons des
moncours prestigieux afin d'obtenir
es missions gouvernementales. Mal-
heureusement sans succes, la setec-
Mon etant faire par un comite restraint
et conservateur ne choisissant pas
Id6cessairement des Innovateurs
omme nous. Notre premier projet fut,
le Speor House de Laurinda. Ce sont
s promoteurs Immobiliers qui nous
nt permis de demarrer, notamment
M. Hemsley (un des plus Brands aux
W.S.A„ proprietaire de 80 immeubles
ou tours 6 New York comme ['Empire
!ate Building) qui nous commando le
aloce, Immeuble d'habitation de
luxe de 38 etages.
Worriment avez-vous obtenu cette
mission ?
JR.F.B.: J'al appris qu'fl etait question
e construire un grand Immeuble sur
rickell avenue (quarlier chic et resi-
dentfel de Miami). Je suis donc olle 6
ew York afin de rencontrer le maitre
'oeuvre. M. Hemsley. Apr& une lon-
gue entrevue, 11 decido de nous
consulter et nous avons gagne le
concours.
Paul Surger, autre grand promoteur
imrnobilier, comprit entierement noire
demarche et nos Intentions, nous
permettant ainsi de construire un de
nos plus beaux immeubles, I'Aflon(rs.
Nous avons done reussi 6 prouver
que, molgre les restrictions budgetai-
res ainsi que toutes les idees que I'on
peut se faire sur les promoteurs, it esl
toujours possible de creer des choses
interessantes et novatrices. Voyez-
vous, le marche de 10 promotion im-
mobiliere aux U.S.A. (80 °io de la
construction) etait jusqu'alors renie
par les Brands noms de ]'architecture
americaine. Ceux-cl pensaient qu'il
leur etait plus facile de s'exprimer If-
brement dons les projets publics et
gouvernementaux. Maintenant que
nos travaux sont reconnus notionale-
ment, nous avons une plus grande
diversite de clients.
Combien de projets faltes-vous
par an ?
B.F.B.: Environ une quarantaine, mais
tous n'aboutissent pas bien sur. 9uel-
que soft leur nombre. fls sont tons
penses entierement tout en etont de
plus en plus « radicaux u. Nous ne te-
faisons jamois Ia m6me chose, et
essayons toujours de changer, de
progresses.
9uelle est votre source d'inspiro-
tion ?
B.F.B.: Nous n'avons pas de source
d'inspiration directe 6 la maniere des
„ post-modernes n, put veulent tou-
fours se referer a des architectures
antiques. De nos jours. tout ie monde
aux U.S.A pence et veut du post-
moderne P. Cest devenu une sorte de
voleur sure. Arqudecfonico est
d'abora et ovant tout moderne. now
ne voulons pas creer un style ma* un
esprit tidele 6 to pensee moderne de
I'architecture,
ll est evident que nous sommes in-
fluences por une culture au une his-
toire. Personneliement. c'est I'architec-
lure coloree des Coraibes, les peintres
surrealistes tels que Chirico et Hock-
ney, to geometric tormelle des natio-
Architectes no 156,1 Avnl 1985
Cf-contre , un projet
desslnb par Laurinda
Spear.
En bas b gauche, une
manlbre de • casser r'idde
de to barre - , Atlantis
22
FtEPOi�TAGE
j
eo./e 9.)U;I
En hout , la fagade de
I'• Imp6rlal
CI-contre , le + Bobylone
Sur la page sulvante ,
an haut, I'entr6e du
• Palace
on bas , fa4;ade sud
d'Aflantla
nalistes ttaliens et les constructivistes
russes pour qui nous avons beaucoup
d'admiratlon. Cependant, cette
culture ne nous emp8che pas de
crder des formes - radicalement P
nouvelles et novotrices. Cela Want
ggalement possible gr6ce aux nou-
velles technologies de construction•
qui nous permettent de rLsaliser toutes
sortes d'acrobaties architecturales.
Est -II possible de dire que vos
b6tlments sont une sorte de cari-
cature de la - barre », par la vo-
rl6t6 des couleurs ainsi que la
diversit6 des formes qui viennent
s'entrechoquer et d6couper le vo-
lume?
B,F.B.: C'est possible, pourquoi pas. II
est indispensable pour nous de crder
des b8timents totolement nouveaux
et , radicaux w, cela nous am6ne
done 6 des formes originales.
Voyez-vous, plusleurs Elements vont se
confronter dons notre demande crea-
tive. II s'agit d'abord de retranscrire
une certaine spontaneite dons la
cr6ation ainsl qu'un certain roman-
tisme. Des formes simples et mOmes
parfois humoristiques vont venir s'ins-
crire accidentellement dons la com-
position du b6timent afin de cr6er une
atmosph6re qui va sensibiliser
d'abord le public. Une de nos inten-
tions est de toucher positivement le
grand public.
Ensuite. I'on essaye toujours de
confronter plusleurs langoges et vo-
cabulaires architecturaux au sein
d'un meme b6timent. Celui-ci est
AGE
23
Wcompos6 de la m8me fagon qu'un
collage. Une grande dlversit6 d'6chel-
Bles de couleurs at de frames vont se
juxtoposer, 6 to manibre d'images
urbolnes.
1Ce10 expllque t-il to c6t6 na1Y at
fantastique des perspectives de
®votre femme 7
B.F.B.: Absolument, 6 part le langage,
rnos seuls moyens de communication
avec le client sont les dessins at les
maquettes. II s'agit donc de le char-
mer at de le s6duire par des dessins
simples, color6s, vlvants at compr6-
hensibles. Tout an restant blen sOr tid6-
Iles 6 noire esprit.
Sue pensez-vous des architectes
Icontemporains ?
B.F.B.: Les oeuvres de Richard Meter
'sont toujours trios riches at cr6ofives,
cependant, II a tendance 6 reprendre
souvent le m6me th&me, la trame
carr6e at to balance. Malgr6 man
I
d6soccord avec les post-modernes,
j'aime blen certains b6timents de M[-
tcha6l Graves. J'al beaucoup d'admi-
ration pour les archltectes japonais
tels qua Kenzo Tonge, Kisho Kurokowa
let Tadao Ando, car comme nous, Its
vont toujours user de tous leurs
moyens matbrlels at intellectuals pour
cr6er du nouveau, ainsi qua pour Os-
car Niemeyer, un archltecte « radical
at an avance sur son temps. Certalns
Jeunes architectes franGals tell qua
Henri Clrianl ou Henri Gaudin sont trios
forts aussi.
Quels sont les projets qui vous
motivent le plus ?
B.F.B.: Nous trovallions an ce moment
sur un Immeuble de bureau de 15
6toges b Manhattan. Construlre des
bdtlments 6 New York me motive
6norm6ment, Ces b6timents vont titre
vus par beaucoup de monde, Its vont
8tre alrrr6s ou d6test6s. Voyez-vous,
nous avions i'hobitude de travalller sur
des sites 6 tr6s foible densit6 ou nos
b6timents se dressolent telles des
sculptures dons un paysoge Inhabit6.
Or 6 New York noire immeuble fern
Partie Int6grante d'un ensemble ovec
d'outres b6timents. de style at de
construction dlff6rents,
En fait, nous ne voudrions pas limiter
noire champ d'actlon 6 une seule vllle
ou un Etat. N'6tont pas une 6norme
agence, nous avons cependant des
bureaux dons trots lieux diff6rents. II est
pr6f6rable de falre Pau de projets
dons divers endroits qua beaucoup
dons un m&me Ileu, cela pouvant
devenir ropldement inlnt6ressant at
ennuyeux,
Vous cr6ez aussi an ce moment du
mobllier le cross 7
B.F.B.: Out, du mobllier, des porcelai•.
nes at mgme des crovates (mats pas
Celle qua je Porte) I Nous avons d6j6
cr66 at r6alls6 2 tables pour Memphis
at nous travaillons actuellemeni sur
toute une gamme de meubles, servi-
ces de table at tissus d'ameublement
pour t'ouverture prochaine de noire
show -room h Miami.
A quo[ ressemblent vos meubles ?
B.F.B.: Its sort calmes, simples at sur-
tout confortables, car comme vous le
savez la plupart des meubles
contemporains dessln6s par des ar-
chitectes sont pout -titre trios beaux
mals malheureusement pas trios prati-
ques par leur monque total de
confort.
Pensez-vous que vos b6timents
produiront le m6me effet dons 20
ou 50 ans 7
B.F.B.: Des b6timents tels qua les n6-
tres, « radlcalement, uniques par leur
composition, leur originallt6, leur
avance technologique at leur moder-
nisme d6fient le temps.
Propos recuelllis por
GALA! MAHMOUD
economic
art
architecture
TON immobilier
no 55
automne 94
moo, ,ar
Im, Fvdr
Ar
A MML
P ffic"M
t
I
■
■■
■■
BONNE
f4ao= 0
Achille Castiglioni : ��iV •��T,��J71---
f1�T4 U 'i'—='( xy1—% •�.—h—.
xLL115Lt#AIM ��,to • 7 s . 9-11
MoA't *M t i. f_AIt nl±ic r:
j1 TiUt—=t4PUP•i'4y{% �'4lI�1CY+
P '�I. • fi�T1 9t—= mat
a,jgt#ifi* 111ZT:dI'
M242'4iWy159*11p 1 3Afi6FA 1 ® 1 13Rr
MA140412 p 5 9 M 3 NM0.�It ST
IRT0591plon 9 9mlt#jst*AgjgjAMaL9M7925$
N t4-*Q=
jE2 0) ,
dqv� IIT——%.^�—'l%•7 tr7ZO):r'tt�TT7❑='J h
K. P. F. t3t10)f_O)7 •r h / — h 3�1rL�91�
�fiio��o)q�iiX4 f4l�r
® PII.�Tq h=�0) "o�%�•r'J • �q'=��" �ff111i:
��t4= 7 7% 7• a �( h' • 7 T h �oRt�ir7)�P�O
v-4—ma, 3T hO)
jq
• - •
P, tcyOF) 5XAa.)36;jb
Arquitectonica in
• Miami-<�t.y--r••��r—F=7�:.P, 'tL'P
`Arquitectonica" (�.�.( v Architecturalo).t) ,y
7a �J9o�tLlc R #�-5 Lt_;g6(1
RPa77 1-•a ��.—to)$l�L'Z
'P�o)�5�rta—x '�o)7taiis�F #,o)L
SEE_
-a Wyk
The Atlantis
Miami, Florida
:'IkVt 4fi- ej- 37- f
lffl;:Vf J'r' t' hit
lik 19SOf1 PATI
U.N."N U,
WORPROP
r du- monde
.
-a
t
fr
4
�i
Z
t � ,€ 1 f J ' 1. i� tS1 - t� ..�} � _.• f � �y*t��fp��-+ltt��, t€,'',���Y�y�� �fyr-t`t
J � c} i `t G+> t r 1 '`` r f.Xt• �.' ? �S J ty.�A id'�.y}�n.4�j�
'�"��Y
-�
� f�IJ� _ 1. Uf..R� wit_ Y �� • � � r. "� j' j `S'
�' _t-_-� r %1 +' 4j.;r f ������•.jp'i rF.fF� � � fit; � � '�s ���.,C�py����st?' r �, ' �t
.'!. f 1 � t � lj f� � fh +K. � . v '� � 4'f t=�'3'�.�!' � � `t� �y� . ?°� • ��.JR6'1;.4/f,7t 4. r ��� . �dy�.•b � :i.'Y�ra ki.`'.� ���� `}..
` � t + " � , 1,-., 4 � r� r .� �,�1�y�.t+`�i!"�g� .. A•• �.� _ ,t�r •--'�''���c� �� �, �. tr. —
f ..�1 f � .•� t Fh'�!.('' S }. r.�� �,'l"°.yY� i l 4 Y :,i!�' ;tc G;r'� �` ra7.R
.. ° r �'��r 1tY: ..�..4..... � � �,. �'#'�:+t.,M+"�"•- 1���1e%'l �`,ti � i.i�S ,�HFY�``� �+�r�b.��
AMM
Air_OWL���_�
��__, W
73ee Information Management Company
305-477-9149 0800-287-4799 • FAX 305-477-7526
IS
a photocopy in poor
condition
FC 017
oride
ri
In
x!x,siecie. Autant dire qu'avant le
is avril 1896, it n'y avait pas grand -chose
dans ces marecages. Pas de route! Rien!
Que des moustiques, d'inquietants In-
diens seminoles, un fort militaire, quel-
ques communautes agricoles besogneu-
ses. une poignee d'esclaves. un comptoir
commercial fonds par un certain William
Brickell et... one tres riche veuve du nom
de Julia Tuttle. Futee veuve qui reussit
a convaincre Henry Flagler, cofondateur
de la Standard Oil, d'etendre sa ligne de
chemin de fer de ]a cote est de la Floride
jusqu'a la future Miami.
L'histoire ne dit pas si les habitants
saluerent en grande pompe 1'arrivee du
magnat des chemins de fer. Toujours est-
if qu'on proposa d'appeler leur ville
a Flagler City,, qui deviendra plus lard
Tune des plus importantes villes du sud
des Etars-Unis. Magnanime et plus s6-
rement poste. I'homme providentiel lui
prefara Miami, un derive du nom indien
«Mayaime„qui sisntifie riviere de la tran-
quillitc. Soled, ete permanent, cocotiers.
bains de mer et sable blond... Les pro-
moteurs ne s y tromperent pas et inves-
tirent immediatement les lieux en
construisam h6tcls eL lotissements. Fla-
gler, lui-meme, sieve le Royal Palm
Hotel, dessinant dans la foulee les plans
dune cite en damier ar iculee non pas au -
tour dune place pubtique. mail d'un &a-
blissement balneaire... Cc centre impro-
bable fait encore aujourd'hui detaut.
speculation immobifiere
Boom de I'immobilier. boom de ]a
population et boom du tourisme! En
1910. Miami compte 5 000 habitants: en
1920. le nabab Carl Fisher achete In pres-
que totalite des 800 hectares de Miami
Beach: I'hiver 1924-1925 accueille
-100 000 touristes alors que la population
permanente de la ville passe i 100000
personnes. Et c est comme si sous la
baguette du sorrier (speculation,,, les
noix des cocotiers se transformaient en
autant de boules d'or. Au nord de I-Etat.
on dit meme qu'un barbier a transforms
en une seule nuit 80 dollars de pourboire
en un million de dollars sonnams et tre-
buchants... H61as! Le moindre incident,
40 MUStART
le plus petit gel ou pirc, le vent mauvais
des ouragans (1926: plus de 200 morts.
plus de 2 000 maisons detruites) font et
defont les fortunes... Qu'a cela ne tienne,
le reve americain version western camibe
tient le choc et meme la case de 1929 ne
reussit pas a aneantir totalement le mi-
rage. Un iournal de 1'6poque ne titre-t-il
pas (Personne n'a pretendu que tout se-
rait facile„7
Architecture
ludique:
Arquitectonica
Celts architecture
fiamboyante,
cas lignes que 1'on
reves de Miditerranee
pourrait qualifier
Cc reve, it se dissimule derriere le? pa]e-
de postmodemes
-
tuviers de Coconut Grove. frissonne a la
et qui ensoleitient
!'horizon de Miami,
tune sous des palmes argentees. se trempe
sont dues A
les pieds dans un Adantique epris de
Arquitecronica, un
Mediterranee. Aux bungalows de bois
groups de quane
jeunes at brillants
Utaii de 1'tmmeuble „The Atlantis, cormtrWt
crdateurs: Laurinda
par le groupe ArqukactoWea (1980).
Spear, Bernardo
Fort -Brescia, Andres
Duany at Elizabeth
_
Plater-Zyberk.
Peinture, sculpture,
histoire de Part,
�'-
culture cararbe at
�-- _
plus sdrement
encore allusion
_
graphique... Le
moindre mur,•s=,+
..
plus petit jardar
MINN� -
suspendu, la plus
=..$ + •«...*. rr;
ldgdre plate -forme...
a m w a= =
tout est refdrencd
dans on univers
_�,.
ludique s accordant
'
=�
singufidrement aux
Les transports qui parfois surplombent la grille,
des pionniers de l'industrie du tourisme
tons de P'arc-en-ciel.
succedent rapidement de somptueuses
Depuis Miami
villas. Vizcaya (1914-1917), par exemple.
at aprds le reste
L'hallucinante residence d'hiver du mil-
des Erats-Unis,
hardaire James Deering entierement
it semble qua ce
construite dans le style Renaissance ita-
jeune groups Passe
tienne et ceinte de jardins a la franGaise.
dcole et s apprdte
Mais aussi, et plus modestementsti
Chero-
A tnveEu la
,
kee Lodge (1917). El Jardin (1917),
19€7), The
vieiBe Eu rope. S. B.
Kampong (1928) et tant d'autres en-
core... Toutes sont visibles aujourd'hui
et le quartier, malgre ses bars, ses bouti-
ques de luxe et ses faux airs de boheme
rescapee des annees 70. dore A 24 carats
une jeunesse fort decontractee.
saluent en montagnes russes I'urbanite du XXI- siede...
L'architecture
do Miaml
aborde
to trotsibme
milldnalre
en fount era'
touter In Mtn
dune gamme
essen I.H.ment
graphique.
l
Ee taut,
le metro du
centre Wte.
BriekaR
Square
budding.
4) lr w v' 'ij
=•ham!
�
CC"
M� • hal
ca
Jcr.
A
W
.�GORE
PEON
r
q
AR4
m DOSY
mim
VE P
SOYLE�
ARATA I
ATK LOJ
IKI PROD
URGUP,
Fa
t
F
w
r7
d ISSN 1300-3801
07
r
9 8i1300 380000
r;
"11 PRGFIL
Arq u itecto n i ca
Mesleki kariyerine Florida'da ballayan iki ki§il'ik bir aile taklmt Arquitectonica. Bugun
uluslararasi bir kimlik de edinen grup dOnyamn Se§itii yerlerinde buyuk yapdar ve
kompleksler gerSeklegtirmekte. Ne var ki, bu sayfadaki resimden de anlaplacagl gibi,
ailevi g6runtu varligtni hala surdurmekte. Ostelik, sadece sdz konusu fotograf bile,
mimarlik dOnyasmda 1950'lerden ba§layarak etkinliklerine tarok oldugumuz kart-koca
ikililerden-ornegin, Eamesler'den ve Smithsonlar'dan- farkh bir ikiliyle yuzyuze
oldugumuzu kanitityor. AdigeSenler Modernist diren5 ve mucadele takimlan olarak i*lev
giirmu';lerdi. Arquitectonica belirgin konformist yonelimiyle onlardan aynhyor. Grubun
urunleri gorsel zenginlikleriyle dikkat Sekiyor; ancak, bu ekstravaganzanm ayni zamanda
E grubun yakla,*iminin c-iddi bigimde ele§tirilmesine yol aSttgt da yadsinamaz.
u
Bir Floridah
grup:
Arquitectonica
Ugur Tanyell
Arquitectonica'nm mimarisini irdelemek
igin, grubun kendisini anlatmak amaciyla du-
,vurdugu iki olay ya da yargi yararli olur. Birin-
cisi, grup, geli5tirdigi mimarinin ilk kamusal
r;iki5im yapdarindan birinin "Miami Vice" di-
zisinde gozukmesine borSlu oldugunu iled
suruyor dergiler itin hazirladigi basin bulte-
ninde. Ikincisiyse, New York'ta 42. Cadde
uzerinde yer almak 0zere tasarlanan "E
Walk" kompleksinin tanitim metni. $oyle di-
yor metro: "42. Cadde tarafinda kule diger
New York yapi(arma bir gonderme olarak bir
"kaya"nm uzerinde yukseliyor. Bu, insane
gokdelenlerin on plandaki dev kayalardan
yukseliyormu5 gibi gozuktugu Central Park
manzaralannt ammsabyor. (._) "Kaya", yapi-
yi ikiye bolen bir gokta5i gibi de okunabilic"
Yukaridaki ifadeleri anlamlandnmak iSin bir
onemli bilgiye daha gerek vac Arquitectoni-
ca Miami de uslenmi5 bir mimarhk firmast.
Bu bilgiyi, nerede konumlamrsa konumlan- I
n , * t sin, ABD mimarhk firmalarmm pek ender bir-
kagi harit hepsinin hem ayakbagi, hem de i
b T 4
p kwtancisi clan ticarile5me (commercialism) I
y gen;egi ile birlikte d656nmek gerekiyor. dun- i
ku, Arquitectonica bu iki ozelligin de nere-
f _ deyse kitabi yetkinlikte bir ornegi sayimalt-
-*_ dir. Ticarilik nitelemesi mimari bi4imin mut-
T kun parasal degenne ve kullanim degerine
katkida bulunmasi anlamma geliyor. 19. yuz-
yddan ba5layarak hi4bir yerde tasarim
ABD'de oldug 9 u kadar belir in bir s :ire gt e
ekonomik anlam kazanmadi. Bu ulkede, dr-
negin, Fransa'da 19201erde entelektuei bir
koi ilk avangard grubun Modem'i savundu-
gu biomde dii5Onsel i�erigini eksen alan bir
uslup ya da yakla5im savunmasi yapilmadi.
Ornegin, Modern'i Avrupa'da hiq de modern
sayilamayacak se4kinci kimlikledyle 116nesans
artigi mesenler desteklediler. Aksine, ABD'de
(Modern veya degil) bipm salt kendisi olarak,
bizatihi, "satdabilir" bir kimlikta5{di. Polemik
konu<-u olmaktan qok, i5eyararltgi baglamm-
da tanitimt yapddi. Atlantik-otesi ekonomisi-
nin a5m geli;kin kapitalist bake* aSdan saye-
sinde toplum metal4ma ve yabanala5ma gi-
bi iki temel olguyu tam bir tavizsizlik ve kara-
Idikla igelle5tirmi5ti. Mir i bipmlerin (iste-
yen bursa yanli$ oldugunu bile bile uslup da
diyebilir) upki yeni Orlin tanitimlan gibi d650-
11
f. Affant4l Alpaatmano,
Miawi�, Ffosid a,.
.198 B2.
Kent merkezinin gvneyinde6 Biscayne Koyi
knnsndm ver alom bu 96, doiieilkaoarwan
kmia ve fotpgioflk nlrelikleri gundeme•get(ren ilk
bim alma" dzelligini. de t sw. bu yinni kodt
apammm, k011eeindeki 100 meeekupluk bosluk-
6wkinlerlm'gWbakon-bir avtu ,4lWr.
Avlumm son kavtsli di vannda cc dge bulmw
yar. bir havuz, kirmm bir spiral metdiven vebir
polmiye.
Bona, krp azgisini dik atryla kesecek bicimde
yedegirilmis, okfugu" i;ln hem Backell Cadde
si'nlen hem--.cLe yokmlardoki whideranzst 0"l-
don kokryco g6nimiyoc BasitamagWO Ur im,
geye whip. Binamn guney cephesi, balkantann.
q mia himsma.yedeten glues kirxi ga"revi 96-
ren, Cc kadt bir mavi izgo*a koph. Kuzey
cephesim kopkryon"yonsifio coma ekienen dart
son u5gen balkon bulunuyor. Binamn Kcya uza•
nonucu;gemilerehas bir kavislekmniryor, kern
ie bakan dlgerWayer okimkumin.0cgense bir.
yandam lesiwt kamilanm gizierken diger yam
don bir kentsei simge s §IW..
1000 menelik uzunluguna• kart eni sadece,
100 metre clan bu'wrio' apamrwmm her ko>
nr,la yolnu oeolh dmi ve iki awnsar-km=o ,
bulunuycr Koyo bakan uciaks kimm, ir mekdn-
da 1BGderece mraromik marzomh bir olar
.ma odnmoa d6nu-v-ryac Zemm kadoki dairele;,
iki kodt solonlan wazel avlulan akin clubleks
kmutlarolorok osorbnmiy.
1980 yArido Aduris projesim Progtee ive
Atchitedure i5d-uultmr lopk, garen serrci kumkIn
yer alanFmnk Gebry, ozdlikle projenin'heylml-
si n ielMerim ve surrealist imgelerinl'. 6- 6i.
1987,deinsosttamomlananbim 1997ynmda
Amedkon Wwariar Bitt4i'nin (AIAj'rest of Ti-
me' 0&l6n,3 kmmndi. -
FOTC?GRAFtaR: r10RMAN W MTH
ARREDAMENTD 61
ANT
"ESTABLISHMENTALIANISTICAL
ACT
ION G.11AR
1Xl:Z]
UMBRELLA • V7,800
MATERIAL -COTTON 2000LORS
t
K rl
ILK
a
G
ct *l
-H G
h I P,
t P"
r
A
F7,-
�11���lll��E N�
m m
4; C fl 4q 10
(-P G
4, .
f, ir,.N kN G Maw SKY 4k4lf:j:
H ftm cm r, u-� G
rH:,\' -G*-,,z,,,iik
M j�N E; K-io
t LfqRj -4 X
H A
otig
n.\
C- 44 ft I N �4 G
P .4 X G:W,P
ir�W nir,-4'
gcj G rr jz,,:L4,
N 7,- 1�' k., • K N r,:!F% 44�a4 C, p 91 H;R G
WHO - - - - [' % : -j,:
-
Al
Ir\
n V— I N -4 G
4 ll — -.j :"C, �,Q I i Aj N 4j*t 93
11 (94n
t ;t.: 6 Ir"AU- h — 4N Ai 4D L,t( K) JJML, Gz
JNA m
rt—K—.N' *l.Mk"H'nV IE —)IR:LY 4t%*-W—"Ilr'—m-
6Y Nv k" - v N G a
RRcfiF 11 P L - Em Ll 4< z, i\-Hatr ij f, p, IW--q Gj-jlq -W♦ to:!! i- p4q-,
tjo ut i I m —
, A ♦, 'I- 'N l\ 1, El
1 -4 1 r,4V4C:T 10 tV
1 D 1561
notadt
Bauwelt
Welcome to Miami
Eine frivole
Arch itekturmelange aus
heiterem Klassizismus,
kontaminierter Moderne
and karibischem
Heimatstil;
eine Immigrantenstadt,
noch Grenzbastion
des Nordens
and schon Briickenkopf
des Sudens.
Luxus, Dekadenz and
Verschwendung neben
uniibersehbarer Armut;
eine besonders brisante
Mischung der Ethnien
and Lebensstile:
Damit leben sie alle,
Tag fur Tag,
in der Magic City
12
31. Marz 1995
86. )ahrgang
91GI
-Postkarten aus den 30er Jahren
iurice Culot den Weg
Spaziergang Burch das heutige Miami.
.;rove mit seinen Boutiquen and Cafes,
istadt Coral Gables,
-h eine der besten Wohngegenden,
co District in Miami Beach,
nd Miami Springs mit der altesten
�n baskischen pelota-Fassade des Landes,
i, Little Havanna
!FSlich Downtown Miami.
;taurants, Hotels and Bars
-i das Gewebe der Stadt bei Nacht.
nn man Miami in sich aufnehmen and die Stadt
inze erfassen, kann unermadlich
en dutch eine Welt der Veranderungen
aste. Am Ende entsteht ein Mosaik
ilichen Erinnerungen and Eindrucken,
tenern and Gelesenem
Noch vor wenigen Jahren war Miami ffir Architekten in Europa
eine unbekannte Gr6Be. Ober New York, Los Angeles and Chicago
weiS man vieles — bei Miami drangen sick die Bilder vor,
meist sogar Filmszenen: Marilyn Monroe in „Manche m6gens heill"
zum Beispiel. Spielfiime vermittelten Lange Zeit das Bild cities
Erholungsorts mit zwei Gesichtern. Die Marx Brothers, Frank
Capra, Billy Wilder and spater das Fernsehen zeigten zwei Typen
von Einwohnem: hartherzige Multimillionare neben gleichmutigen
Pensionaren, die auf pastellfarbenen Liegestuhlen vor ihren ebenfalls
pastellfarben angestrichenen Unterkdnften herumsaBen.
Halle ein europafscher Filmfreund um 1970 ein Bild von Miami
gezeichnet, waren zwei Stile sichtbar geworden. Der eine Teil
des Bildreservoirs ware gepragt gewesen von gro8artigen Villen,
von Anwesen im Stil der Mittelmeeriander mit all den dazugeh6rigen
Golfplatzen, Klubhausern, Jachten and eleganten
Strandpromenaden. Fur these Welt ist Palm Beach zu einem
Gattungsnamen geworden, der auf jeden entsprechenden Ort
an der Kiiste Floridas, sei es Boca Raton oder Coconut Grove,
anwendbar ist. Der andere Tail hatte die ciedrigen Fassaden
kleiner Betonschachteln mit ein wenig Art -deco umfaBt,
den palmenbestandenen Ocean Drive, fast stillstehende
Kumuluswolken vor tiefblauem Himmel and endlose Strande in
einer Gegend, die dem Aquator zu nahe liegt, um sich von
den Gezeiten beunruhigen zu lassen.
Um these imaginare Stadt geographisch zu verorten, hatte man links
davon einen groBen grGnen Klecks eingezeichnet and an den Rand
geschrieben: „Hier leben die Alligatoren". Die Everglades kennt
der Europaer aus der Werbung fur einen Aperitif. Einiges von den
Geheimtiissen dieses groflen Gebiets lernte ich aus dem Bach
der Historikerm and engagierten, manchmal sogar militanten
Naturschutzerin Marjory Stoneman Douglas. „The Everglades, River
of Grass" erschien zuerst 1947 and wurde immer wieder aufgelegt.
Die Everglades, den Indianern als Pa-Hay-Okee (FluB aus Gras)
bekannt, erstrecken sich heute fiber etwa 5000 Quadratkilometer;
fruher umfaSten sie ein weit gr66eres Gebiet. Fast Gberafl betragt
die Wassertiefe our etwa 30 cm.
Nicht bloB Durreperioden bedrohen dieses Sumpfgebiet. Eine
umweltzerst6rende Politik, die auf Trockenlegung setzt, Kanale,
die Meerwasser einstr6men lassen, and nicht zuletzt
Grundstiicksspekulation and Besiedlung rucken ihm zu Leibe.
Schon 1923 regte der Landschaftsarchitekt Ernest F. Coe an,
das Gebiet zum Nationalpark zu erklaren; zwanzig Jahre spater wurde
der Vorschlag verwirklicht.
Einige Ansichtskarten aus den dreiBiger and vierziger Jahren
kommen mir in Erinnerung, die ein Onkel aus Amerika schickte.
Sic geh6rten zu einer Serie „Tropisches Florida", waren im
Art-Colortone"-Patentverfahren hergestellt and an der stoffartigen
6bertlache sofort erkennbar, die ihnen einen kimstlerischen
Anstrich gab. Vor mir liegt eine Postkarte, auf der eine
Eisenbahnbrficke im Ozeao verschwindet. Sparer erfuhr ich, daS die
Bahnlinie verschiedene Aullenposten untereinander and mit dem
Festland verbindet. Die ReaIitat blieb hinter meinen Erwartungen
zunick. Auf den Spuren von Humphrey Bogart and Lauren Bacall
pilgerte ich nach Key Largo. Aber das ist verschwunden,
ertrunken in dem Band stumpfsinniger Baulichkeiiten entlang
des dutch and durch langweiligen Highways, der die Eisenbahnhnie
ersetzte, die wenige Jahre nach ihrer Inbetriebnahme von einem
Hurrikan hinweggefegt wurde.
Eire andere Ansichtskarte zeigt auf Leitern stehende Manner mit
K6rben fiber der Schuller beim Pfldcken von Orangen, die im „Art-
Colortone"-Verfahren magisch fluoreszieren. Diese Plantagen And
wahrscheinlich genauso zu Baugrundstdcken geworden, wie
die Plantagen in Coral Gables in den zwanziger Jahren. Nach dem
Bauwelt 1995 Heft 12
Ersten Weltkrieg wuchs der Effektenmarkt, der Immobilienbesitz in
Miami wuchs noch schneller. Marjory Stoneman Douglas beschrieb
die Situation folgendermaBen: Zil9e, Schiffe and Autos kamen an,
voligestopft mit Menschen. Die Hotels and anderen UnterkGnfte
waren restlos belegt. Die Leute schliefen auf Veranden, in Zelten,
auf Parkbanken. Oberall war vom grogen Geld die Rede. ,Millionen`
war ein Wort, das man standig hdrte. Baugrundstticke ffir Gewerbe
and ffir Wohnungen, Wohnhauser and Geschaftsgebaude, ganze
Flachen am Stadtrand, Flachen ilber Flachen, warden gekauft and
weiterverkauft, sobald nur die Papiere ausgefertigt waren. Man
kaufte mit geringem Eigenkapital and nahm grolie Hypotheken auf.
Die Profite waren horrend. Alles war verschwommen and visionar,
alles bestand our auf dem Papier, doch jeder, der das Millioneaspiel
mitspielte, glaubte, es sei Wirklichkeit and werde ewig so gehen.
AuBerhalb von Miami, his an den Rand der Everglades, sag
Immobilienfirma neben Immobilienfirma. standig fanden Barbecues,
Werbeveranstaltungen and Auktionen start, wo die Verkaufer sich
vox der wartenden Menge die Kehlen heiser schrien. Grove Tore
wurden errichtet, dutch die BGrgersteige and Strallenlaternen
zu nichts anderem fuhrten als zu weiteren Grundstucken. StraSen
wurden in den tiblichen Rastern angefegt, andere Planung gab es
nicht, keine Parkwege, keine Parks— fiberhaupt nichts anderes
als einen schnellen Umschlag von Geld."
Im September 1926 wurde Miami von einem Hurrikan verwtistet,
mehrere hundert Menschen starben, 2000 Hauser wurden v6llig
zerst6rt, 3000 schwer beschadigt. Der Sachschaden erscheint freilich
gering, vergleicht man ihn mit dem, den der Hurrikan Andrew
in der Nacht des 24. August 1992 anfichtete. Damals wurden
im Gebiet von South Dade 25000 Hauser zerst6rt and 50000
weitere schwer beschadigt.
Andrew kostete our wenige Menschen das Leben. Der Hurrikan
von 1926 war todbringend, and er verwustete gerade die Gebiete,
die den Reichtum der Stadt symbolisierten, etwa Miami Beach oder
Coral Gables. Das Ereignis hat sich in das kollektive Gedachtnis
eingefressen: In Bars and Hotels findet man immer noch Bilder von
der Katastrophe. Vielleicht hangen sie dort aus reiner Nostalgic,
vielleicht such aus dem Wunsch heraus, die Naturgewalten
zu bannen, die uns immer wieder daran erinnern, daB es in ihrer
Macht steht, alle unsere Planungen iiber den Haufen zu werfen.
In keiner anderen Stadt als in Miami bedeutet eine Autofahrt
ein solches Fest ffir die Sinne. Man fahrt dutch Tunnel von Grim in
den Arohnstrallen von Coral Gables. Auf einem malerischen Umweg
schaut man auf einen Park and entdcckt riesige indische
Feigenbaume mit knorrigen Stammen, die ein wirres Geflecht von
Luftwurzeln umgibt. Eine nahe Verwandte diesel Gewachses, die
ficus aurea, ist beriichtigt daffir, dab sie die Baume erstickt, an denen
sie hochklettert— ein weiteres Beispiel, wozu die Natur fahig ist.
Der U. S. I, der Highway, der von der kanadischen Grenze bis zur
auBersten Stidspitze Floridas, his nach Key West fiihrt, wird auf
seinem Weg dutch Miami von einer Ehrenwache in Gestalt
tausender stolzer and eleganten K6nigspaimen flankiert. Damme auf
Meeresniveau, die Miami mit Miami Beach and kiinstlichen Inseln in
der Burht verbinden, schaffen unvergieichliche Vertrautheit mit dem
Wasser. Wir fahren am Ufer entlang, makellose Linienschiffe drehen
uns den Bug zu; ich mache die ehemalige France aus.
Die Annaherung an das Stadtzentrum auf den HochstraBen ist
gleichermallen eindrucksvoll. Bei jeder sanft geschwungenen
Betonkurve zeigt sich ein verandertes Panorama der Innenstadt;
die Wolkenkratzer bewegen sich vor der Silhouette wie riesenhafte
Dressmen..
Deco Delights" ist der Name eines Schokoladenkuchens mit
Sahnehaubchen and Eiskremstfickchen, der in den siebziger Jahren
Stadibauwelt 125
Tropisches Klima end tropische Ritchie,
Vielralt der Ethnien and kosmopolitische Toleranz, gro8e Unbekdmmerlheit
trotz uniiberbrBckbarersozialer Gegensa'tze,
die explosive Bevdikerungsmisc5ungaas
liberaiem judischen Burgertme von der East Coast
and erzkonservatfven Fliicht ingen aus Kobe,
omen zur Schae gesleltter W'ehistand
end enubersehbare Armut:
Es ist ein nitillerudes Milieu, das in Miami
Inspiretiomqueire ist ffir eine
„Architekmr der Tropen" im Sdden Nordnmerikas.
Und ailes geht immer ein venig darin our
and verwandelt sich dabei: Der International Style mischt sich
mit Inditionenen Bauweisen der Karibik, die seriilianische Architektur
mit dem Klassizismus des Attertums;
am Ends stAtdean manchmal of s Giuekstall
wie das Atlantis Building von Arquiterttudea
ans dem Lahr t982, des mehrere gedankliche Vater
and doch eine unvemechselbare FersdeBekkeit hat
593
ff
{ r
oil ago 190, A
on
Im
IN
® �r-No m
Ij T ; +� {t I{FF 1
j li�Ww R' :.fA�fP t I1,4 �.` 1�t} '�.fG..a� f' f•.•i IfSi t t}�Y.:11 t4"q� I M�
R
a za aft r;�$ �� _ C F r
mo
_ I- l
�� �� �� �� � �Ir !'k .... xl iak �.'�� �- -- � W'f iiT..}•11 I
�r PM�� pN M•N �M1 r..a w �. �. j
EE EO of om mm on NO NONE
100 ME ME ME ME ME Mm MR ME mm
OE M® ®E ME EE NN N . m
ONMEMOMEMMMOME No me mom
EOEEEO ENEO EIS NN O .E MEMO
mN EE EE Em EE EE '�yy]q��jmm
EE EE EE ®O NN EE ff�{o mo
EN NE EE ME NN m um m�
-- MENOMONIE
ME no No on ME
a U ME ME ON ON E
NO NE �O EI® f "I.- ,= MO ME ON ®E
ME ME NE ME
mmm
!•� � 7' 1
la_AL:d/ «�irli {NWflr� :..•ell G _.f-ter' ir�� I Y(i� � � 'GV.s__ i "` `. �
NONE
MEMO
mEME
NONE
MEMO
moms
NINE
MEMO
MEMO
NONE
0
� :
■ \�
JI
\ ,m\
\
-
MR
wring the 1980s the art of architecture has zagged and
zagged, searching for a strung cultural compass.
When something has seemed new, it often has turned
out, on closer inspection, to he old. But when five
young architects, four still in their twenties —infan-
cy, in architecture —launched their practice in Miami eleven
years ago, identifying themselves by a Latino name, Arquitecto-
nica, they soon began to startle their fellow architects as well as
the public. Arquitectonica is dedicated to romance, with a flash
of audacious wit. Not only has this formula succeeded under the
lucent moon on the semitropical Cuban coast of Florida, but the
firm is now winning commissions in other glamour -hungry ciries
all over the country-. Arquitectonica has opened branch offices in
New York, Chicago, and San Francisco, has tried one in Hous-
ton, and has buildings that are
either completed or under design
for numerous other locations in
fourteen states.
Of the five, the remaining Gla
�
partners, co -owners of Arquitec
tonica, are two talented, hard-
working professionals, Bernardo I�rCh�te�t�
Fort -Brescia and Laurinda Hope
Spear, who are also husband and ■
i� wife. He is becoming a legend for Latinh's e b r t 't f
ing on Biscayne Bay, brought the firm its first fame. TV producers
have used it, as a setting in "Miami Vice" and other shows, and so
have fashion photographers. It is a classic modem home, beaUti-
fully worked out, and also a demonstration piece for the designers'
visual twit. Entering the suburban -size lot, one walks through a
geometrically planted thicket of black -olive trees to face a long,
unrevealing wall of bright pink, with a red stoop leading up its
side. Low in the wall is a small round window', which gleams
greenly. But it is not a window; it is a porthole, and what one sees
through it is the undenwater of the Spears' swimming pool, cle-
vated, on the other side of the wall, where Dr. Spear swims
his laps.
The Spear house was followed a few years later by what still is
the firm',, hest -known building, a twenty -story condominium in
Miami, also overlooking Bis-
cayne Bay, called the Atlantis.
Atop its roof is an enormous
C
u
� �® abstract sculpture, painted red,
and the building's flat torso has
been sculpted as well. High on
the fagade, a large tour -story
re with the chunk is punched out of the
design, all the sway through to the
Mash, other side. In the midst of this
emptiness sits a putted palm tree
t, xu a an pursan o prospec silhouetted against the sk}, be -
live clients as well as for his ��Ar���teeit��t�,ra 1* side a whirlpool bath, with a spi-
design work. Born in Lima, Peru, ral staircase, painted bright red
he has dark eyes, a short nose, a
biggish chin, a clearly marked
mouth. A lock of dark hair often
dips over his right eye. He speaks
five languages and can use them
M all effectively. She is tall, wide -
shouldered, with long arms,
long -fingered hands, light brown
eyes, muted freckles, and a calm By waltel
,'M air. Besides buildings, she designs
furniture, jewelry, and neckties.
Florida, especially Miami, seems an unlikely place in which to
® start a serious design movement, because it has such a mixed ar-
chitectural history. After the glory days of Addison Mizner and
M his Castilian dreams, there came a mild flirtation in the created
community of Miami Beach, across Biscayne Bay from Mianii
proper, with small art nouveau or art deco hotels. Many of these
remain today, and some of them are being restored, but they are
M now thoroughly overshadowed by the resort convention hotel,.,
that were built in the fifties and sixties —anti -aesthetic monsters,
Mwhose exteriors are nothing but big and whose lobbies are archi-
rectural delicatessens.
Several miles to the north is a rather different environment,
the conservative, close -in community of Mianli Shores. Here
decorous streets are lined with stuccoed muck -Mediterranean
and southem-colonial houses, all of them single-family homes,
with perfectly tended lawns. Miami Shores shuns Mianli proper, a
Cracker city until the 1960s and 1970s, which brought an influx
of hundreds of thousands of Cubans fleeing Castro to try to make
Miami a new Havana —or an old one. In more recent yearn,
spurred by further immigration (mainly of Haitians, Salvadorans,
and Nicaraguans), the city has grown to he the financial capital of
6i the Caribbean, operated from sleekly conventional modern sky-
scrapers, glossed by the sunlight.
Tie house that Arquitectonica completed for Laurinda's
father, a thoracic surgeon, hack in 1978 in Miami Shores, front-
® NOVEMBER 1988
twisting upward. The walls of this
opening are bright yellow, and
one is rippled. It could be on a
hook jacket for an early collec-
tion of short stories by Noel
Coward.
Arquitectonica began by ac-
cepting almost any type of eom-
McQuade mission that came along or could
he ferreted out —jobs from pinch -
penny speculative builders of
housing, office space, and stores. "Sometimes these building
types are considered very, banal, "says Bernardo, "but that doesn't
mean an architect shouldn't address the problem." He and Lau-
rinda try to make each building memorable to the public by giving
it its own identity, sometimes by fantasy. They both have
learned, as well, to keep costs down and to make changes during
the design stage at clients' demand.
y now, however, their practice has grown and
attracted the attention of national clients with better
Kidding budgets. Granite and marble are beginning
to replace painted stucco. The firm has just cony
pleted a superbly functional courthouse for Dade
County, with a sleek modern municipal character, dignified
without being dull. Windows are tilted at odd angles; colors are
strong; a drive-in is included for the paying of traffic fines. Also
recently completed or under construction are a shopping mall in
Atlanta, ;a substantial technical center for the state of Virginia
near Dulles Airport, and, in Peru, a large and complicated bank —
Office huilditlg with hig windows gazing out un the Andes moun-
tains. In Peru also is a hutrse that Is a masterpiece of hand crafts-
naanship, and the tinn recently completed two houses in Chicago.
All of Arquitectonica's five founding partners were Ivy League
cduc;ttcd. Hervin Romney took archircctural training at Yale, as
did Andres Duany and Elizabeth Plater-Zyherk. Fort-Brescia's
background was cosmopolitan. Of French anpd Italian descent, lie
147
a
,r9A
ll
^t
t
e
Xr7
ni_YY
d +�z
1 fi i
I
A.
AMW
A .��o G—��r yea Mr
0
The In%rmadon Management Company
305-477-9149 •800-287-4799 • FAX 305-477-7526
co
ndition
FC 017
EE
among them, Rockne Krebs's neon
rainbow over the Miami River and
Claes Oldenburg and Coosje van
Bruggen's gigantic bowl of oranges
at the county Government Center
downtown. They'd be wonderful any-
where, but in Miami, they really
mean something. • Krebs's neon
Miami Line makes us see exactly
what's there -- a soaring span of
a bridge. Then the work leaps to
another dimension, defining both the
1E
bridge and the idea of a bridge. It is
Miami's permanent rainbow, in a land
of many ephemeral rainbows, offer-
ing us an uplift whenever we need it.
Oldenburg and van Bruggen's Dropped
Bowl With Scattered Slices and
Peels symbolizes, if rather elliptically,
Miami's climate and its crops, its tour-
ists and its fragmented population, •
The elements that are so essential to
Miami, so intricately part of its past,
present and future — nature, culture,
48
Elements so
essential to
Af 1 a m i recit i
in its art all
arch itectrire
tourism — recur in art and arch
ture, underfoot and overhead. I
down, in the airport's Concours
to see cast bronze sea plants, s
and starfish embedded in the terr
floor (a work by the artist tic:
Oka Doner), or, look up at the
less steel palm fronds that arch a
the Brickell Lletromover static
work by the artist Carlos Alve
The architect Laurinda Spear, a
ner in Arquitectonica, took an ,]I
abstract Indian art form, the p
work done by tl4iccosukee it
women, and abstracted it furthe
a stained glass window at the
Dade Justice Center. Outside c
LEFT. 'SKYCOURT' OF THE ATLANTIS, ON
MIAMI ONE, FOREGROUND, AND NATION
yTOWER, INDEPENDENCE DAY.
c1 iJ t%1 i�
'` an
917
u�': a,tnl�onq�.rb �ntssa.tFntd Ott
nox?a swobq uyo[•pnn salog aailoAnp
•Ara:i 9utuuL.) aqt 9ut.tnp \'�rl ut pa.utt
-raj ay of utmm.,) am! Aattrj allt.Jo muds •lou
anry will Aagtunt3 r Jo uonrtuaunuop sn(d
'uonaldtuoa uodn V/d a! pa.nttra-I uaaq anry
ImIl apraap stilt tum.1 s.1auutm Jo xapul ul!
juasa.td am 'sward 11191a 9111A+ojpj ayt Ito
•a.tnut 1Jadsa ura a.t+'uontu9o.,a.t VIV
AoJ algt9ga Ijns oar. Sara.( asayl luo.t,1 s.tautttm
F'/d Pataldwo� agt Ja JIMI .iltsea a.)uls pub•
•5.13tnArd ` t111jN p.nnj.)ty .iq'rurlpul •.luoul
-JPH A+aj+j 'tunauatjtv ayt pur. aalrl.)wst;•
punk uuajr.A�� .iq 'uotsog slumultuoptio.)
t.tno:) [I.-JIMID sl.)alty.)At• tJr.L .iq 'uotsnoH
VJrVt.! ayt :plAAajy syuta+I� aAougt!IS
Aq `rlgrjv tpneS 'geppa f 'plutum.-) L lel-I
aqi :tto.)S nalA%ON ptpnr;J id 'rur.Ipul 'sntj
-tunlo) 'XI1I!.r3 9ulti:)JI \s 11, rurtpuj -)III
:. mnt uolttu9w.m algnop s!yt uo,a ).\ry ntlp
aprxq) lsed ayt Jo s.lauulm Vj,( atll 9uo-
•splumv .touoH VIV paulml osir. •uunaid
wo.) AaIJe •aney s.lauulm Auew .nolj aas of out
-.iJnrA9 uaaq Sell IT •uopinttsuo:7 pur u8lsop
uaamiaq aspr. AllmidAi trgt sXrjap pur. sal.)
-rlsgo agt y9no.njt'uonaldlLlo.) of papaa.)aAd
anry sAauu!A% b'/d Jo {tlAofrw lra-IM at1j.
au11Sys Hump.? agt (to amgd su )fool uoos
ya!4'"'C{Jal'r»ogd alPplwj r..)tuot�aunb.lt� .icl
asnoq tuatut.trde situelty ayt srm uom it .uta.i
aqt Sutyool-aigrgo.tdun osle !(ij. uun{d
dot) suotsmaA Aol'ew ou qum tltnq sea+ 1! lnq
sateuossd .y za tact tsn9nv pur ,dno.t-) soon
-rnouuj uegA;1 'aiooj\sajimjD .iq -. -mPisttt
AoJ 'r11PtLp rzzrtd ayt Ao.1 uytsap ayt pataaAY
JatlagsipJo uq N •aonan.nsuo.) otu! .iltdtuo.td
panow 't.)rJ ul 'anry paa.)oAd of .daily
t5ra( patjonl aney trot st.)afoAd aqt Jo atuoS
•ssa.)oAd stilt g9notyt payyrnbstp uaaq
a,+Py stsgeuy jtm;mas put! 'mo uwgl .iAAr.
of ,•uoltuatul pur, .(tt.toytne ayt ytlm stualta„
AoJ ate sjesodo td tegt autzr9rut atll .icl uottra
-ytta� uo tua9unuo.) aq flt.\+ sLtott.)alas s,0111'
aqi trgt pains anrLI SwAoJ .iauta sp.nt. V
V/d •s.lra.i tua.)a.t ul •5tuivAtsuo.) pl toarjt:a.!
t:tadmi of pry aAPy tryt sau{agos apts9uotr
a1updn ep.tr.%,V d/d
loLIUL:) cat t 'a.tat.)atlt aAt"
L' aaurape 4rLtt suolluaA111 palaunuPAtun apyAN
14
unttnadwoa ayt Jo tno su9tsap turaID-adtd
daatl of sa.{nsrau! tat.ns .il9ulsra.INIf atlrt at
prq N/d 'pl-tom lealit.)auyaAu ayt ut 1.101ILM
-tr ganul RU11149 aAaA+ su9tsap Ie.)nagtodAq
uagn+'s0461 atjt ul 'uop"u u-)zA tr/d Aau.1 9
of djulrw paslnap satuayis—tjinq oq of
lueaut Aanau a.tan+ tPyt .tua( y.)ra satanla n+aJ e
patae.ttte sry uoltttadtum slgt ',(jgrtinaul
•.Iauutm pa.tagtuotwm ,iltuiLm r sr.A%
tt asnraaq u9tsap IP1.1191.10 ayt of tttnq Slleuy
sem pazn{r.9.toa.t looyas aqt asneaaq s.traA
AnoJ AoJ pantat{s uaaq pry tryt xaldwo.) jun
uaplsaA aSattoa r ase:) auo uI !sin.) antt.)nAlsap
wo.IJ st:)afoAd panto anrt{ spArmr aqt 4q Time
-Aaua9 aplAd tuatl:t pur uonuam.. :)tignd ayt
(lutanba.tJ a.totu .tr.3 •a.tm.)atttj:mr. 9utuutm
par..++r sau'tuut ayt rivap of ta9pnq uost.td
r. paysrjs a.)nelsu! ioj 'a.lnirlst9al alms auo
:paAgy.)ry uotvittho a.t ayt 'sasu:) Jo Aagtunu
Ileuts yaula.nxa ue uj -ul lag laaJ ploy Jo
9unut.) tso.t uatIm uopinilsuo.) a{oJaq Mgtq
-r..wut11.% Jo po!.lad ayl Ln su9tsap 9utpuetstno
azfu9cl.).,.I of Itmatu m.a Lur.dwd N/d ayt'st.)a
-(imd tltnyun-ta,i-sr. AoJ uotlnacltuoa r. sv
.tea,( 9utnsu3 ayt
9ttunp uopmi.cls im .tapun aq of „sp.1voq ay
uo„ y.tom Imtm.)any.)Ar tsaq ay 9utztu9oxm
alolsslul jmM11Ad sn lsol .laAaU 5l'q MeuSoAd
atll lltq •smoda,t t(.).tl'.aSa.I jwnwoltgJm pub
stmodo.lrl 9ulutwid'u9tsap urq.nt apnlnn
of papurdxa srtl uo!ipaduloJ ayt Jo ado.)s
ayt `a.)uts sapr..)ap ayt uj •lsro.) Ppuolllt'J
agl uo sumtufulopun.) yaur-d Pas s Aattrtty.\1
11ltqu.1111. uoptIA-J a.toolIy put'. 'Purlp
-ul ut s•uautAIMS o.tag
jAn AtaN ut yurd tsnA_L s.la.mi:mjnuq
sJVOs •rrt(d(alm(rll.t ut s.tamot IM 413130S
,;.!-NI '1V'j sr. aq-ut-syAewpuej yens papnlaul
+.woof.\+ tur..l tuAd atjtJo s.na.i {jAea aqt ul
•pallaunrl
snot uonrtaduut.) jruottru maw a 'sjruols
-saJo.tcl utauuua jo 6nf a of anssl K61 .iArn
-urf )gl.io.) sajdtm?x.)jo uonaatas aqt patsn.n
-Lw s.Iotlpa ayt •Aeai 9ulmolloJ ayl A(tJ
sp.morj atlt tw yAom jo 6a•\ARS IPRULI'
s aulzr.9r.w atjl jo tno pa9Aawa weA9
-n.td spAI!.\% • V.d •,ql '9961 ut X')V
TI-10111 11211q dy7jo mV4 sv
S'd9VI4 AdIll 2UZYVI E u dy9s,
PdjJdjvs azflft c uvw srrzozp
S86I y2no.ty?- 946Z u O-tf
s-caUUP'Pl sptvmv V/d jo
&dorms aj7)p-0j-ssa..d014'V
.tsltn j� jttt.rjl'•rU
rtlutrtly •t9.L
nrju7/•p
as t� s.zauut�
t
P-
Miami.
Vincent Scully sees a place
C full of private majesty,
c but devoid of public glory
C2
By PETER WHORISKEY
Herald Architecture Writer
o now he's in Miami, this old guy from
New Haven. He's got a blue blazer on and
-
a gray felt hat, very New England, so even
though the Florida weather is balmy, one
.-
look at him makes you think of flailing leaves.
his
He's driving around with the window down,
}
voice rising and falling, displaying a Lear -like
range, soaring with rapture, whispering in confi-
dence, cackling like the devil, all the while doing
z -
what he does best, indeed, doing what has made
him feared and famous.
-
Vincent Scully is talking about architecture.
The legendary professor from Yale, the man
Philip Johnson described as the "most influen-
tial architecture teacher ever," has bought a
house in Coral Gables, is teaching spring semes-
ters at the University of Miami, and is, as usual,
ruminating on his surroundings. For South Flo-
ridians, his presence offers a rare chance to tap
an authority, an almost moral authority, from
whom even the titans of American architecture
I
seek blessing.
®
Literary references -
_?'
As Miami unfurls before him through the
wo
windshield, he exalts, he derides, he ponders, all
i
the while weaving in literary sources as diverse
!.
as the Travis McGee thrillers and the Babylo-
nian epic of Gilgamesh. He calls the 20-story
federal jail on Fourth Street a "tragic image of
YQ
incarceration," the elevated plaza in front of the
main library "a great opportunity to create pub-
lic space — missed," and the rising Portofino
Tower on South Pointe "terrible... of brutish
proportion."
The Arquitectonica-designed condominiums
on Brickell Avenue are "delightful, especially
®
ithe one with the hole in the middle." He notes
,their resemblance to Rem Koolhaas' early work.
In South Beach, the Art Deco style "is won-
derful for a city by the sea — it's urban, and at
the same time it says, 'Holiday! Mediterranean
fun!'" On Ocean Drive, his hands begin to
wave, calling attention to the orderly contrast of
"Look he
the natural and the manmade. at it,"
exhorts, beaming, "You get the city facades on
®
one side — and the immensity of the ocean on
the other."
a No great public apace
Overall, he sees in South Florida a place
resplendent with private majesty — homes with
magnificent jungles or water views — and virtu-
ally devoid of public glory, of places where peo-
ple conic together.
"What Miami lacks is a great public space,"
® he says. "When New Haven was laid out, in the
E PLEASESEE SCULLY, 2C
HOLE IN THE MIDDLE: Arquitectonica's
Atlantis building on Brickell Is'delightful.'
METROMOVER: It's'fun,' but tracks hover over
sidewalks and block views, Sousays.
tjr C .a
YI[t "T
isuoo
our oe.4
e
6611 _
%y I
59 is
ro . I
I'
If
I'
—�i
� �Ui'�1��': Arq��t�ctc�n#�a d®��gn�d the
� , :At��r�tis �or�domin�um, �►i�h i#� s uar�: :
..�
h®i� i� t�� �iddl�, ��n ��l:�k���:
+-m-��wnrrrzr,��.�,i�,.�v rnr�**xai�,:,,.��.at���9�,�i a=�r;� E s. i�
n, � _ �- '
ru":4
`'� �'-
� '' �
Cando as cruise ship
Groundbreaking is set for Aug. 14 for Atlanti c-on-Brickell, a 21-story
condominium intended to resemble a cruise ship. The condo at 2025 Brickell
Ave. on Biscayne Bay will hold 91 apartments priced between $200,000 and
$600,00.0. Owner -developers are Montreal -based Sol Luger and Sam Greenber.
The five -story opening in the center of the building will be a "sky court" with a
small pool and, the developers say, "a solitary palm to add romantic
atmosphere."
:.
r.
r,K 77
rill
WO -9
1790
a
I
ar s ri tes r. warcted,
in rc hector
By PETER WHORISKEY
Herald Architecture Writer Renowned archite ' ct
This year's best in local archi-
tecture, announced Saturday Cesar Pelli headed
4 night by the Miami,,Chapter of jurythat selected,-,
the American Institute of Archi- the
.1 tects, runs the gamut — from a
r lifeguArd stand to a*,. classroom the winners.
building to .a hotel.
"What is most refreshing is
that we are seeing a fresh "batch Southern Florida accent,," said
of architects coming to the front Cesar Pelli, the renowned New
it's not just the same old Haven architect who is design
names this year," said outgoing ing Dade's Performing Arts Cen
chapter prcsidcnt Mike Rodri- ter.
guei.
Pelli headed the jury that
T,he following', projects won selected the winners. The group'
Awards for Excellence:
also included Allan Plattus,
M The South Beach lifeguard associate architecture dean at
f stands by William Lane Arch- Yale University, and architect
tects. Harold Roth.
0 The'Netherland hotel resto-
ration and addition in. Miami The jury also bestowed a 10.
Beach by Giller & Griller. Year Test of Time Award on the
N.Broward Community 'Col- landmark 'Atlantis condomin-
lege Health Sciences Building in• ium on Brickell Avenue in
CoOnut Creek - by • Rodriguez Miami, which was designed by
and Quiroga Architects. Arquitectonica. Spillis'Candela
0 Dr. Rafael Pefiatver Health
& Partners won 'a designaward
Center in Miami by Silva Archi-.,, for an unbuilt. Tri-Rail station in
tects of Coconut Grove. :Deerfield Beach.
it A The Tennis Cottages at The
Village of Windsor in Vero. The Firm of the Year. Award,
Beach, by Caruncho, Martinez & which.Jecognizes design ,excel .
Alvarez Architects., lence and community ''service
Tese he winners represent many over, time,.. -w
as presented .-to;',
f - o outhe currents in -architecture of Mateu.,, Carreno, Rizo Fart-'
Art-
r..
im&,". but.with a' strong.:,, 'ners
7
7') (_^11
1
Wednesday, December 5. 1984 TV o Advice • Entertainment Section B
Two architects are changing the face of Miami
with their futuristic superstructures, and the rest
of the world is taking notice
CAROL COMER
talked about why they live here
r+uamiMvv.Rroen.r
and.about Miami yesterday, today,
At southernmost Interstate 95,
tomorrow.
FAMILY TIES:
that spot where you are freed of
U.S. 1 and begin sailing up into the
We like living in Miami very
city, just over to the right, there
much. We have more work
elsewhere than in Miami, but we
they are.
The blue grid squares of the
still choose to work from here as
our base," Fort -Brescia said. The
Atlantis with its red triangle
riding on the top, sky winking
main reason why we continue to
through the hole knocked out of
live here and work here is not only
the city, but the fact that we have
Its middle, and In the hole the red
corkscrew and yellow tube and
our families here, and that we like
swaying palm.
to live in a place where we have
close re you know.
To the north is the Imperial, a
ship of a condominium, the bold -
rations;
MIAMI S CONVENIENCE:
".he
red-and-blue-tonoino curving in
the city,is a regional center.
{
0
'�`i
f�� e�13.F
Florida South Chapter. Atlantis on
Brickell. Miami Iabove): Arquitectonica,
Coral Gables. Fla. Located on a 2(X)x;(X)-
foot site overlooking the Biscayne Bay.
the 20-story condominium building has a
37-Foot-square hole punched from its
middle, and this void is transformed into
a yellow cube containing a gym and
squash court on the south plaza. Eight
apartments open onto the void, which
serves as a sky patio with a Jacuzzi and a
palm tree. Common building elements in
bright colors provide accents: A red tri-
angle placed on the roof covers mechani-
cal equipment, four yellow angular bal-
conies interrupt the reflective _lass cur-
tain wall on the north facade, and a large-
scale blue stucco grid laid over the canti
levered balconies doubles as a brise-soleil
on the south side. Two elevator cores
with three apartments per cure eliminate
long corridors.
Florida Association. First District Court
of Appeal. Tallahassee I belowl: William
AL I l 'vm portents
Morgan. FAIA. Jacksonville. The sym-
metrical design and the two-story white
brick colonnade recall a 19th century
North Florida courthouse. Steps flanked
by brick planters and a bridged terrace
over the lower level service entrance lead
to the main west entrance. A central sky-
light provides daylighting in the two-story
courtroom. The 48.000-square-foot facil-
ity is located on a sloping site lined with
large trees within the downtown State
Capitol Center development.
y
.� � 4 a ..-r•;`N ,��� ��`.,�7,'`"� u � .T,,, t�sa ri Y"<%-a� a �c � 1
�.r ,�
w
Mhtl�MWN
1i Center: A landmark for thefuture
Arts Center for Miami, The fact central place for them in our Miami's en117, into its second
�puh�' A that it has taken longer than community, century and its "arrival" on the
RND U expected makes the start more Construction of the center not world scene. It should be a land -
exciting and gratifying today. only fulfills a dream, it marks mark that celebrates the future.
"is ppresident ofthe Miami ari-
Spitlis Candela & Partners, which
n ms to enter the design rompeti-
de Pc-r%rmingArts Center. Spit-
uildingc include the downtown
tts of rVfianti-Dada Community
night Convention Center, and the
nver. Candela wrote this article. or'
forming Arts District" — a sepa-
rate opera house, symphony hall,
and drama theater.
The significant issues of poten-
tial sites, whether to group per -
in formance halls or disseminate
them in order to win support
from all areas of the city, were
In addressed by the pro Bono report.
That report also identified some
of the positive characteristics
and deficiencies of our existing
make -do facilities and perform -
Ming ensembles. It set out a "gen-
erous" schedule that envisioned
construction by 1990. An army
13of many faces formed around the
vision and has succeeded in cre-
ating further enthusiasm for the
notion of a landmark Performing
W
"Second Century Miami" is
taking a significant step; it is cele-
brating its 100th anniversary in
1996 by showing the world the
quality of our private and public
leadership. It has been, and it will
be, the dream of many, many
people. The financial commit-
ment of our government and the
private sector arc combining to
build a state-of-the-art perfor-
mance hall with flawless acous-
tics and the latest technology — a
unique cultural center that will
help renew and enrich the reper-
toire of theater, dance, lyrical,
and musical art forms.
With renewed fervor, we must
strive to make this Performing
Arts Center a success for all of
Dade County, to ensure it adds
to the cultural richness already
apparent in the Book Fair and
the Film Festival, and the inter-
national recognition achieved by
the Miami City Ballet and other
groups. We make our pride in
our cultural groups tangible and
encourage their further flowering
when we secure a permanent and
i
c ter,'
?t
* l'ueulay, I)CCC•Inber 17, 1991 k3.1
-$t11 frandsCO faaminer
John Wayne
may have been
America's pa-
triarch, but his
t family saw him
Lin a different.
light., his
daughter, Ais-
sa, writes in her
new book. [B-31
3eyond modernism: Building on color, action and `a story line'
Above: The flrm's landmark Atlantis, in Miami, has a void, or
shy court, that sits within the 1201 through 171h floors.
Left: A circular stairway, cantilevered beyond Atlantis' facade,
connects lire shy court directly to several adjacent apartments.
Below: The Spear House, near iliscgyne 1igy, is paurted five
shades cr/,pink and is tiu' 1110,f , "lit,-, i/-'rl ,J ,I
Sky's the limit
for Miami -base
architecture team
By Zahid Sardar
OF THE EXAMINER STAFF
Dernardo Fort -Brescia, 40-year-
old architect of the Mianii-based
team Arquitectonica, seems to be
trapped in a whirlwind of his own
making.
"Miy is it that there are so
many deadlines in December?" he
protests, possibly feeling the pres-
sure of a six -city tour for "Ara•
tectonica," a book about the tear
work (AIA Press. $55 for hard-
bound/$40 for paperback. 214
pages). With his wife and partner,
I.,aurinda Spear, Fort -Brescia
heads a sas4y young firm that has
revolutionized architecture around
the world in barely a decade.
The two have been busy since
their first buildings of note: the
1978, very pink Spear House, a
residence on Biscayne Bay in sub-
urban Miami; and Atlantis, a 1982
condominium complex that has be-
come syronymous with Miami.
'Niev have introduced )lit,
j AliAAft. 11_1
n
$0.
JULY 211, 1�
,.y
. r
a-
t� .
r
'.�i�♦p ^ t,�'.'. r ,yam
g
>.i
' • rr -r t rrr. t,F rrr"M-�- -
' " . r s . , r .. r, r r� ' r r t !'r rd tr{ �Yi�ty¢�• r•
r tr.. ra• ! arr:, yr' r :rt r trt r��yC -
" - ♦ r ♦ .fY r:' t.r rtrrrr-r mitt ��♦l��
.� • -' r fr r r rr i r��t•�Ir rl rr r,� .I rt sir � sr r>+rr �yY�,�r�?'w.� �}��,,
t - .,. 'y r'. r t. r t . r♦!'r r1 .r+ r !r str✓# ♦, xt tt `'w�jY•��.. r.+.
84
orl.c.
IN
.•YM� ., r t r r. t r r� • r I f •�) f •t " ! r r' f r ►.fit 1` y r r h J �l S! 4tY A t
."r r r r r.i � •�s r try `r r � r S� r rr:.ry '�`x� ♦ �i ti Fr7 Y }
.1
� �,!'r rs.:.'rRrr r.. r ! r. S ♦tti r# � .rf ►tt %!r r4�P� �'�+ 3.��.1-s)t}!�
' r e r r'yr 1 i r f r f r r . e r r- r rrS szrt_ Z✓ �! R $„ ��
. ` t. irr !rr ;ar r rrr'yt'rrrrr✓rlr(Fy r.yiCrf rrt'} ar.z""ri }trry�t�k•�ttt� tf -
- r rr.+ rr7r ��►r Ir . rrltr�i7 r} rivi frT rrrrltYi ti''rl t. .G'rk�1A3�.'�t tyr �'�,
-■■-A■■■
t '`�•e
r.�r rlrrr r ; •.. .rr ltrl�!!r �l .r' irr r:r� r t is
r!lr rrr.rt y.,y! • y 'I 1
" r l" rr I - rr- �•r rr'. •.i rri. Tr trR !•r +tk,r r2 i -T r :�.a y r r Itr♦r fir
- 7"r rrr rrr r r r r.• r r, r'r rrt.�r r1 ��,ri Irr4 rt :.s rr tty 1"rtr
• rr' ' rri r r r rrr Y• ►r. lam' 11 1.
Jrir
)r' <'r it-e7 rir rrs'rr t'r !r! r r
r ls• 1. ri�.rrrrrrs.r r+f��.r4 rrr_rt� st C h
lrrr rr •�
' - r t rrrr r'e:, s♦ tr'•f Cr �'►+ rr► .�u'r re*. frlY r'f rr t ..
— -� � a, _ r r'/.7rr rr . rtrl r r•�rrr•.� rrrrr... N rRY. t ,J. ;tr�t's rrr<Iiy.' -.
� !�rr.r r.r•r rl, '. rrr:.: rrrr rNer rr... s !< rr►'trt"
r ryrr.rr.r , * r`e! _.i/t r".,/r'sr i- t{rl fli �••yr
frrrr�Ir r ,rt r rr,.ry rr: r t ytr�t't'
I{ 1 i rr•r � rrrr�r r 1r��.r'tr 5.! J :�;. _
a-
1
R rr.
Design
Aazzing Up
.-The Functional _
1Abi -ash young Miami firm
qffe -s more than modernity
jj odern architecture —the uncluttered, ,
_.1 m functional kind —has come to be a
synonym for boredom in many quarters.
1 But not in Miami. where a brash young
"firm called Arquitectonica is creating un-
- adorned, mechanical -looking buildings
that startle the eye with their loud prima-
ry colors and jazzy architectural stunts.
Consider, for example. the firm's Atlantis
condominium, an apartment tower with a
1,bright blue grid on one side. Twelve sto-
ries up, a huge hole has been cut into the
- ,'slab. The open-air decor of this "sky
lcourt" features a swaying palm tree. a
urved yellow wall, a red spiral staircase
—rand a blue whirlpool.
Such exuberance is Arquitectonica's
ay of trying to make up for modern ar-
chitecture's shortcomings in social pur-
pose and aesthetic satisfaction. These
faults have sent other architects to the at-
ic for historic forms and ornaments. Ar-
uitectonica is building on the spirit of
a daring and experiment that characterized
-garde earlier in this century.
Dhe avant
:; 'We are not trying to create a new style."
ys Launnda Spear, 33. one of the found-
ng partners. "We are just trying to make
modern architecture more lively and up
�_Io date."
Arquitectonica's other principals are
1pear's husband Bernardo Fort -Brescia.
2, and Herein A.R. Romney. 43. The
firm's Spanish name is apt, and not only
_;,,because the buildings show a frisky Latin
bravado. Fort -Brescia was born in Peru,
rand Romney is from Cuba. All three part-
--ners, however, are the products of Ivy
_League schools. Founded only seven years
'ago, Arquitectonica already has a staff
Palace: drama from a red interloper
. r
s r
Town houses in Houston: people will buy modem It It has more to offer than modernity
Atlantis condominium In Miami with "sky court': exuberance that is still functional
of 29 in its Miami headquarters and
has opened offices in Houston and New
York City.
One of the firm's best-known build-
ings is the controversial Palace in Miami.
It consists of a plain 4l-story slab with a
three-story glass -cube penthouse on top.
Rammed right through the side of the
slab is what seems like another. smaller
building of glass and red stucco. For add-
ed drama (and terrace patios), the red in-
terloper steps down like giant stairs.
Currently on the firm's drawing
boards or under construction are a court-
house for Dade County, in suburban Mi-
ami; a $150 million office -hotel -retail cen-
ter in downtown Miami; a bank in Peru; a
shopping center near Dallas; high-rise
buildings for San Antonio and Manhat-
tan; and several town -house clusters in
Houston. One completed ten -unit group
of the Houston town houses looks, charac-
teristically, like something put together by
a gifted child with an oversize Lego toy
set: white triangular roofs. extruding yel-
low strips and even more extruding blue
boxes. The houses are designed to provide
young urban professional tenants with a
sense of efficiency and space on minimal,
close -to -downtown lots, and at a reason-
able cost. The typical unit contains a ga-
rage, a foyer and a I Y-story living room
on the first level, a dining balcony and
kitchen on the second, and on the third a
den, master bedroom and "Hollywood"
bathroom —a tripartite affair in which
two powder rooms adjoin a common bath.
Price of the only unsold unit: $157,500.
-• NLl�
i
4 r
0
w
Ud/TAiyy 1'HU 11:43 PAX
SHORELINE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW CO1%MI TTEE
RESOLUTION 99 - SDRC - 2
WHEREAS, Point Development Corporation has applied for approval of a site plan for
the proposed Brickell Bay Village project located at 2101 - 2105 Brickell Avenue and as fully
described in the attached recommendations and site plans, and
WHEREAS, the proposed project consists of a 421-unit apartment building with related
amenities and a public baywalk on a 3.27 acre parcel and
WHEREAS, the subject application as filed with the Miami -Dade Department of
Planning and Zoning dated December 15, 1998 requests site plan approval, and
wrHEREAS, the Shoreline Development Review Committee considered whether and the
extent to which the project as presented conformed to the Miami -Dade County Comprehensive
Development Master Plan, the City of iviiami Master Plan and the Biscayne Bay Management
Plan, and
WHEREAS, the Shoreline Development Review Committee of Miami -Dade County has
as one of its primary responsibilities, the duty to determine the extent to which any plan or
development action, as proposed, is in conformance with Iviiami-Dade County Ordinance 85-14
and the minimum standards set forth in Miami -Dade County Resolution 85-257, and
WHEREAS, the Committee considered the recommendations of Miami -Dade County
staff, and
02/25/99 T'HU 17:44 FAX
LVJ u U.)
C
E
R
WHEREAS, a public meeting of the Shoreline Development Review Committee of
Miami -Dade County, Florida, was advertised and held, as required by law, and alI interested
parties in the matter were heard, and upon due and proper consideration having been given to the
matter;
NOW THEREFORE BE 1T RESOLVED, that at its advertised meeting of January 28,
1999, the Biscayne Bay Shoreline Development Review Committee, as moved by Jose Feito and
seconded by Gladys Margarita Diaz recommended approval of the development action as
presented and enumerated in the attached staff reports and site plans with the following
provisions and conditions:
1. That the landscape density along the perimeter of the subject property be
increased with taller, denser plant materials.
2. That the architectural elements and landscape elements at the rear of the subject
property be synchronized.
3. That additional exterior seating be provided on the bay side of the subject
property.
4. That trees providing better shading and ui keeping with the scale of the building
be installed at the entrance of the subject property.
5. That the bollards with chains along the baywalk be placed six feet on center.
6. That limestone rip rap borders be placed on a 2 horizontal to 1 vertical slope along
both the north and south faces of the bulkhead; said boulders should extend to an
elevation above the high water mark.
02 25/qq THU 17:45 F1.1
0
The vote on the motion was as follows:
Les Beilinson -
yes
Thorn Grafton -
yes
Patrick McCoy -
absent
W. Chad Williard -
yes
Jose Feito -
yes
Gladys Margarita Diaz -
yes
Motion to approve passed - 9 - 0.
Fxm]
Rosa Epstein -
absent
Caridad Hidalgo -Cato-
yes
Bill Rosenberg -
yes
Andrew Witkin -
yes
Deborah Swain -
yes
This resolution constitutes the report of the Shoreline Development Review Committee together
with all exhibits attached hereto submitted to the City of Miami Board of Commissioners,
Miami, Florida pursuant to Miami -Dade County Ordinance 85-14 which shall become a part of
all hearings and/or permit records on the proposed development action.
Respectfully submitted,
Les Beilinson, ALA.
Chairperson, Biscayne Bay Shoreline
Development Review Committee
Date
App. # 98-15
c.'JouaSwrklwadprolShorelfnc Ucrdopmeu RrAcw F1alRsdudon 99.2
44J UU4
11
H,
BRICIELL BAY VILLAGE
Prepared for: POINT DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
by: A. VICKY GARCIA - TOLEDO
BILZIl``, SUMBERG, DUNN, PRICE & AXELROD LLP
c9- 261
11
BRICKELL BAY VILLAGE
MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT
January, 1999
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. Project Information
A. 1) Application for a Major Use Special Permit - Residential
2) Application for a Major Use Special Permit - over 500 parking spaces
3) Application for Planned Unit Development for Increase in Density
4) Application for a Contribution to the Affordable Housing Trust
B. Disclosure of Ownership
C. Ownership Affidavit
D. Directory of Project Principals
E. Project Data Sheet
F. City of Miami Zoning Atlas Map
II. Project Description
A. Zoning Ordinance No. 11000
I. Section 1304.2.1 Application Forms; Supplementary Materials
2. Section 1702.2.1 General Report
3. Section 1702.2.2 Major Use Special Permit Concept Plan
4. Section 1702.2.3 Developmental Impact Study
III. Supporting Documents
Tab 1 Minority Construction Employment Plan
Tab 2 Traffic Impact Analysis
Tab 3 Site Utility Study
Tab 4 Economic Impact Study
Tab 5 Survey of Property
Tab 6 Drawings Submitted
GADMS\73646\ 11342\0220358.01
12/22/98
r9s 261
BRICKELL BAY VILLAGE
MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT
January, 1999
PROJECT INFORMATION
ARTICLE I.
A. Application for a Major Use Special Permit
B. Disclosure of Ownership
C. Ownership Affidavit
D. State of Florida Certificate of Good Standing
E. Directory of Project Principals
F. Project Data Sheet
G. City of Miami Zoning Atlas Map
Nk
GADMS\73646111342\0220358.01
12/22/98
6
CH OF MIAMI
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
APPLICATION FOR
MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT
IT IS INTENDED THAT MAJOR USB SPECIAL PERMITS BE REQUIRED WHERE SPECIFIED USES AND/OR OCCUPANCIES INVOLVE MATTERS
DEEMED TO BE OF CITYWIDE OR AREA -WIDE IMPORTANCE.
THE CITY COMMISSION SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR DETERMINATIONS ON APPLICATIONS FOR MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMITS.
(SEE ARTICLE 17 OF ORDIN,,VCE 11000, ,S,,NENDED, THE ZONI,VG ORDLV,4,VCE OF THE CITY OF,tifmmi. FLORID,.)
THE CITY COMMISSION SHALL REFER ALL APPLICATIONS FOR MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMITS TO THE PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD AND
TO THE DIRECTOR OF THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT FOR RECOMMENDATIONS, AND MAY MAKE REFERRALS TO
AGENCIES, BODIES, OR OFFICERS, EITHER THROUGH THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT OR DIRECTLY, FOR REVIEW,
ANALYSIS AND/OR TECHNICAL FINDINGS AND DETERMINATIONS AND REPORTS THEREON. (SEE SECTION 1301.5 OF ORDINANCE I1000. AS
AMENDED, THE ZO,VING ORDLvaNCE OF THE CITY OF ,b#,4,ill, FLORID,.)
SECTION 2-653 OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI. FLORIDA. AS AMENDED, GENERALLY REQUIRES ANY PERSON WHO RECEIVES
COMPENSATION, REMUNERATION OR EXPENSES FOR CONDUCTING LOBBYING ACTIVITIES TO REGISTER AS A LOBBYIST WITH THE CITY
CLERK., PRIOR TO ENGAGING IN LOBBYING ACTIVITIES BEFORE CITY STAFF, BOARDS, COMMITTEES AND THE CITY COMMISSION. A
COPY OF SAID ORDINANCE IS AVAILABLE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK (MIAMI CITY HALL), LOCATED AT 3500 PAN ALMERICAN
DRIVE, MIAMI, FLORIDA, 33133.
NOTE: TIIIS.4PPLICATIONMUST BE TYPEWRITTENAND SIGNED INBI4CKINK.
Coral Way Investments, Inc.
herey aply to the.of
and Development of the City of Miami for approval of a Major Use Special Permitounder the provis onsof thetof Artic.lel 17 of the City of Miami Zoning Ordinance.
Property Address:
2101 — 2105 Brickell Avenue
Nature of proposed use (be specific): See Addendum to Application Note 1 , attached
hereto and :na- de Part hereof.
APPLICATION MATERIALS
I attach the following in support and explanation of the application:
® I. Two original surveys, prepared by a State of Florida Registered Land Surveyor within one year from the
date of application.
son ® 2. Affidavit disclosing ownership of property covered by application and disclosure of interest form (attach
forms 4-83 and 4a-83 to application).
Z) Ji 9 61
APPLICATION MATERIALS fcHoncinued>
I attach the following in support and explanation of the application:
1001
3. Certified list of owners of real estate within a 375-foot radius from the outside boundaries of ro (attach form 6-83 to application). p penY
M 4. Maps of the:
a) Existing zoning designation.
b) Adopted comprehensive plan designation for areas on and around the property.
12 S. General location map showing relation to the site'or activity to major streets, schools, existing utilities,
shopping areas, important physical features in and adjoining the project, and the like.
6. Concept Plan
a) Site plan and relevant information per Section 1304.2.1d-h.
b) Relationships to surrounding existing and proposed futures uses and activities, systems and facilities,
per Section 1702.3.2a.
c) How concept affects existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan principles and designations;
tabulation of any required variances, special permits, changes of zoning or exemptions, per Section
17023.2b.
7. Developmental Impact Study (an application for development approval for a Development of Regional
Impact may substitute).
S. Other (be specifiic): — See Addendum to Application Note 2 atta hed
hereto and mad
® 9. Fee of $_ 30, 000.00 for the Major Use Special Permit, based on current fee schedule as set forth in
Chapter 62 of the Code of the City of Miami, as amended.
Q 10. Additional fee of $ , for any required special permits, char f zoning or variances set
forth in chapter 62 of the Code of the City of Miami, as amended.
Total Fee: $
Signature
Name 1do
Address �, Z t► 4, !
Phone/Fax 3_0 3733/_loy�i_DyVZ 33�3
Date
FINAL. APPROVAL OF THUS APPLICATION FOR &I,VOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT SHALL CONSIs•r OF AN EXECUTED RESOLUTION BY THE
IAMI USF CITY COMMISSION AND A DEVELOPMENT ORDER ATTACHED THERETO WHICH SPECIFIES THE CONDI•rIONS UNDER WHICH THIS
I:VI:'li )I SPECIAL
CIrAPPLICATIONERMIT APPROVED: OD13Y THE !OESIRESOLUTION
0N�f0 r AND
ORDER UP)NFECtr I)NTHERE)F. BE TRANShIrED -ro-mrWNR ORAUTAUTHORIZED
ADDRESS SPECIFIED ABOVE.
Note 1
Note 2
BRICKELL BAY VILLAGE
ADDENDUM TO APPLICATION FOR
MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT
Request for Major Use Special Permits For:
a) To develop a 421 unit high-rise rental apartment building.
b) To construct a parking structure containing 632 spaces.
c) To construct a Planned Unit Development allowing for an increase in floor
area ratio to up to twenty percent (20%) over the allowed by the underlying
District.
d) To obtain a twenty-five (25%) bonus through contribution to Affordable
Housing Trust.
The above Major Use Special Permits are to encompass the lower ranking
Special permits requested below:
a) To apply for a Class II permit for a waiver of certain requirements of the City
of Miami's, off street parking guides and standards.
b) To apply for a Class II permit for new construction between the bay and the
first public right of way.
c) To apply for a Class I permit to permit permanent recreation facilities.
d) To apply for a Class II permit to permit a restaurant as per Section 906.7.
e) To apply for a Class II permit for reduction of loading berths.
f) To apply for a Class II permit for conformity of landscaping and standard.
g) To apply for a Class I permit to permit the staging and parking during
g
h) To apply for a Class I permit to allow development/construction/rental
signage.
i) To request a waiver from the City Commission:
i) from the waterfront open spaces and setbacks.
from the noise ordinance during the required concrete pours for
construction of the building.
D To apply for a Certificate of Appropriateness for ground disturbing activities.
k) To apply for a Class I permit for aviation hazard
1) To apply for all other lesser permits as may be required to allow development
and construction of this project as contemplated under this Major Use Special
Permit application as submitted and per plans on file.
�iy
AFFIDAVIT
STATE OF FLORIDA }
COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE ) SS
Before me, the undersigned authority, this day personally appeared Coral Way Investments, Inc.
who being by me first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and says:
That he/she is the owner, or the legal representative of the owner, submitting the accompanying application for
a public hearing as required by the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, affecting the real property located
in the City of Miami, as described and listed on the pages attached to this affidavit and made a part thereof.
2. That all owners which he/she represents, if any, have given their full and complete permission for him/her to act
in his/her behalf for the change or modification of a classification or regulation of zoning as set out in the
accompanying petition.
3. That the pages attached hereto and made a part of this affidavit contain the current names, mailing addresses,
elephone numbers and legal descriptions for the real property of which lie/she is the owner or legal representative.
4. The facts as represented in the application and documents submitted in conjunc99 with this affidavit are true
and correct.
Further Affiant sayeth not.
STATE OF FLORIDA Applicant's afire
COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE
The foregoing ins entt was acknowledged before me this da of 19 1� by /// ���c� y �_ - � - ��
partner (or agent) on behalf of
r a partnership. He/She ispersona lly known to me or who has
uroducedf� / as identification and w id (did not) take an oath.
Notary Public -State of Florida
Commission No.:
My Commission Expires:
Alicia I Samdier
My Commission CC599689
•� Expires November r 2000
0 •••yy Iprp' 9,,OF F`p�� f�i t.1 tJI l0 J6..
OWOW--N�L
Owner's Name Coral 1lVay Inyestr►1e�t. Inc •Florida Corporation
Mailing Address 311 Southwest 27th Avenue Miami p1 rida 33135
Telephone Number _(305) 649.0442
Legal Description:
Owner's Name Not applicable
Mailing Address
Telephone Number
Legal Description:
Owner's Name _ Not applicable
Mailing Address
Telephone Number
Legal Description:
Any other real estate property owned individually, jointly, or severally fby corporation, partnership
or privately) within 375 feet of the subject site is listed as follows:
Street Address
Not applicable
Street Address
Not applicable
Street Address
Not applicable
GADMS\73646\11342\0220358.01
12/22/98
Legal Description
Legal Description
Legal Description
DISCLOSURE OF OWNERS "
11
1. Legal description and street address of subject real property:
2101 — 2105 Brickell Avenue, Miami, Florida
Folio Number 01-4139-001-2500 and 01-4139-001-2510
2. Owner(s) of subject real property and percentage of ownership. Note: Section 2.618 of the Code of the City of
Miami requires disclosure of all parties having a financial interest, either direct or indirect, in the subject matter of a
presentation, request or petition to the City Commission. Accordingly, question #2 requires disclosure of
shareholders of corporations, beneficiaries of trusts, and/or any other interested parties, together with their addresses
and proportionate interest.
See Attached.
3. Legal description and street address of any real property (a) owned by any party -listed in answer to question #2, and
(b) located within 375 feet of the subject real property.
Not Applicable.
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE
Owner or Attorney for Owner
G� e, // //"'"
The foregoing instru t w acknowledged before me this Z day ofG�j+
1921by C �,tv w partner (or agent) on behalf of
a partnership. He/She is personally known to me or who has
produced v i ,� as identification who did (did not) take an oath.
me:
Notary Public -State of Florida
Commission No.:
My Commission Expires:
Aiwa I SamAier
* My Commission CC599689
10 t Expires November 7 2000
O
�tE0F FL'J
V 4L
,n ,
DISCLOSURE OF OWNERSHIP ADDENDUM
Owner: Coral Way Investment, Inc.,
a Florida corporation
Owned: 100% by Coral Way Holding,
Inc., a Barbados corporation
Shareholders: Name
Number
Ricardo Chiari R.
of Shares
Raul Arango G.
5,000
50.00%
Carmen Chiari de Aran g o
1,000
1,000
10.00%
Gilberto Guardia F.
10.00%
Teresita G. de P. de Guardia
500
500
5.00%
Carlos A. Arias Ch.
70
50Q%
Mary M. de Arias
0
0.70%
Carlos E. de la Guardia
40
2
3.50%
Daira A. de Jimenez
420
4.20%
Ofelina A. de Chapman
42
4 20%
Idarela Arias de Alvarez
107
4.%
Fernando Arias Chiari
107
1'07%
Emanuel Arias Chiari
1'07%
Total outsatanding
10 00
1010.00 /o.06°0o
Under Purchase/Sale Contract to:
Point Development Corporation
100%
Point Development Corporation, a Florida corporation, is
owned by.
BCOM Property Corporation
JNA Holdings, Inc.
50%
50%
BCOM Property Corporation, a Florida corporation, is owned by:
Michael Baumann
Phyllis Baumann 2.5%
Terry J. Franzen . %
5
Richard Van Buskirk 0%
2.5%
JNA Holdings, Inc., a Florida Corporation, is owned by:
Aslan Palachi & Lillian Palachi, his wife 50%
Jeff Palachi
50%
09 261
' ' `o
LEGAL DESCRI____ 2T_
Lot 65 and 66, Block B of FLAGLER SUBDIVISION according to the Plat thereof as
recorded in Plat Book 5, at Page 44 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida,
together with a portion of Bay Bottom lying Southeasterly of and adjacent to said lots 65
and 66. All being more particularly described as follows:
Begin at the most Northerly corner of the aforesaid lot 65; thence run S.520-50'-14" W.,
along the Northwesterly line of said lots 65 and 66, for 200.00 feet; Thence run S.370-09'
46" E., along the Southwesterly boundary of said lot 66 and its Southeasterly
for 732.65 feet to an intersection with the established Bulkhead line, according totheprolongation,
thereof as recorded in Plat Book 74, at Page 3 of the Public Records of Dade County,
Florida; Thence run N.41 °-26'-30" E., along said Bulkhead line for 203.98 feet to an
intersection with the Southeasterly prolongation of the Northeasterly boundary line of said
lot 65; Thence run N.37°-09'-46" W., along the Northeasterly line of said lot 65 and its
Southeasterly prolongation for 692.34 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said described
parcel of land containing 142,482.04 Sq. Ft. (3.271 Acres +/-)
also known as
All of Lots 65 and 66, Block "B", FLAGLER SUBDIVISION, as recorded in Plat Book 5,
Page 44, Public Records of Dade County, Florida, and the following described parcel of
land:
Commencing at the Southwesterly corner of said Lot 66, thence run South 37 degrees 9
minutes 46 seconds East for a distance of 183.97 feet to a point. Said point also being on
the Dade County Bulkhead line; thence run North 41 degrees 26 minutes 30 seconds East
along said Bulkhead line to a distance of 203.98 feet to a point; thence run North 37
degrees 9 minutes 26 seconds West a distance of 197.75 feet, said point also being the
Southeasterly corner of Lot 65; thence Southwesterly meandering along the high-water line
of Biscayne Bay a distance of 202 feet more or less to the point of beginning.
GADMS17364611134210220042.01
12/18/98
� ti
BRICKELL BAY VILLAGE
DIRECTORY OF PROJECT PRINCIPALS
Owner/Development: Point Development Corporation
1110 Brickell Avenue
Suite 303
Miami, Florida 33131
Telephone: (305) 375-0900
Fax: (305) 375-8183
Contact Person: Aslan Palachi
Architect: Wolfberg Alvarez & Partners
5960 S.W. 57 Avenue
Miami, Florida 33143
Telephone: (305) 666-5474
Fax: (305) 666-4994
Mr. David Wolfberg
Principal
Mr. Aris Garcia
Project Architect
Landscape Architect: Laura Llerena
6401 S.W. 87th Avenue
Miami, Florida
Telephone: (305) 279-1651
Fax: (305)
Traffic: Post, Buckley, Schuh & Jernigan, Inc.
200 Northwest 107th Avenue
Miami, Florida 33172
Telephone: (305)
Fax: (305)
Mr. Jeff Easly, P. E.
Economist: Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P. A.
One Southeast Third Avenue
Suite 2100
Miami, Florida 33131
Telephone (305) 374-1574
Fax: (305) 372-8161
Mr. Darryl K. Sharpton
Legal: Bilzin Sumberg Dunn Price & Axelrod
2500 First Union Financial Center
200 South Biscayne Boulevard
Miami, Florida 33131-2336
Telephone: (305) 374-7580
Fax: (305) 374-7593
A. Vicky Garcia -Toledo, Esq.
G:\DMS\73646\ 11342\0220358.01
12/22/98
S t ��
3 W7
BRICKELL BAY VILLAGE
Project Data Sheet
• SITE:
2101 -2105 Brickell Avenue
Miami, Florida
• LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
See under Article I
• SITE ZONING:
R-4
As described by Article IV, Sec. 401 (R-4 Multifamily High Density Residential) of
the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida.
• PERMITTED USES:
As described by Article IV, Section 401 (R-4 Multifamily High Density Residential)
of the Zoning Ordinance for the City of Miami, Florida, the permitted uses are, but
not limited to multiple family buildings.
• DENSITY:
As per Article IV, Sec. 401, the number of dwellings is determined by a maximum
net density of 150 units per acre.
(3.27 acres x 150 units per acre = 490 units maximum)
• NET LOT AREA:
142,498 sq. ft.
3.2713 acres
*(As per the site area calculations submitted by High Surveying & Mapping, 9/29/98)
• GROSS LOT AREA:
As per Article XXV, Sec. 2502, gross lot area is defined as, "the net lot area, plus
half of adjoining street rights -of -way and 70 ft. of any other public open space
including, but not limited to, bays.
(142,498 net lot area + 50,838 bay area + 10,000 Brickell Ave. area)
203,336 sq. ft.
4.668 acres
*(As per the site area calculations submitted by High Surveying & Mapping, 9/29/98)
• BUILDING FOOTPRINT:
Max Permitted: As described in Article IV, Sec. 401:
At four -tenths (.40) times the gross lot area equals:
(203,336 sq. ft. x .40)
*81,334.4 sq. ft.
GADMS173646111342\0220358.01
12/22/98
"
fi
Proposed:
44,902 sq. ft.
Tower/Podium: 44,227 sq. ft
Pool Gazebo: 657 sq. ft.
F.A.R.:
Max. Permitted:
As described in Article IV, Sec. 401:
Base F.A.R. equals one of seventy -two -hundredths
(1.72) times the gross lot area:
203,336 sq. ft. x 1.72 = 349,737.92 sq. ft.
As per Article 5, Sec. 502(c):
Additional 20% bonus (1.72 x .20 = .344) allowable
under P.U.D. equals:
203,336 sq. ft. x .344 = 69,947.58 sq. ft.
As allowed under the Low Income Housing Trust:
Additional 25% bonus (1.72 x .25 = .43) equals:
203,336 sq. ft. x .43 = 87,434.48 sq. ft.
Max. Development Permitted with all bonuses:
Adjusted F.A.R.: 1.72 + .344 + .43 = 2.494
203,336 sq. ft. x 2.494 = 507.119 98 sa ft
Proposed:
504,040 sq. ft.
As defined by Sec 2502, Supp. no. 3 of the Zoning
Ordinance of the City of Miami,
for countable residential
floor area.
• GREEN SPACE:
Minimum Required:
As required by Article IV, Sec. 401
Fifteen -hundredths (0.15) times the gross lot area.
(203,336 sq. ft. x .15)
30,500.40 sq. ft.
Proposed:
40,066.76 sq. ft. '
• SETBACKS:
Required: As required by Article IV, Sec. 401 Supp. No. 3 of the
Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, the
minimum setbacks are as follows:
Front (Brickell Avenue): 20 ft. min.
Side: (10 ft.)
Rear: (10 ft.)
G:WMS173646111342\02203 58.01
12/22/98 ,
For buildings which abut a right-of-way of one hundred
(100) feet or more in width, the maximum height of a
building at its base building line is two hundred forty
(240) feet; portions of the building above that point (two
hundred forty (240) feet in height) shall not exceed a
heights as delineated by a sixty (60) degree inward -
sloping plane measured by a ratio of one (1) horizontal
and two (2) vertical measured from said point.
Required:
Required:
Proposed:
G:1DMS173646111342\0220358.01
12/22/98
As also required by Article III, Sec. 33D-38 of the
Shoreline Development Review of the Zoning
Ordinance of Dade County, Florida, the minimum
setbacks are as follows:
Shoreline: (25 ft.) (For buildin le
75 ft.
Side: 25 ft.
g so than 35 ft.
in height)
(For buildings exceeding 35
ft• in height, the setback
shall be increased by 50%
of the additional height of
the building to a maximum
setback of 75 ft.)
As per Sec. 3 CHT;(mm)(ii)(A) and (B) of the City of
Miami Charter, all surface parking or enclosed
structures shall:
Shoreline: be set back at least 50 ft. from the
seawall (or rear bulkhead as per Zoning
Aggregate Director's interpretation).
Side Yard: have an average side yard equal in
aggregate to at least 25% of the waters
frontage of each lot based on average lot
width.
Average Width of lot: 200 ft.
Aggregate Visual corridor: 50 ft. min.
Front (Brickell Avenue):
Tower: 87'-4" not inclusive of
balconies
Podium: 116-4"
Shoreline (Rear):
7
Tower: 146ft.-3"
Pool Gazebo: 58'-51,
Side(North East): 45'-3", not inclusive of
balconies
Side (South West): 45'-3", not inclusive of
balconies
Tower: 87'-9", not inclusive of
balconies
Podium: 30"-0"
Pool Gazebo:76'-2"
Aggregate Side Yard: 75'-3", not inclusive of
• VISUAL CORRIDOR: balconies
Required: As required by Article II, Sec. 33D-38 of the Shoreline
Development Review of the Zoning Ordinance of Dade
County, Florida, an unimpeded visual corridor to the Biscayne
Bay of 20% of the width of the lot (up to 100 ft.) shall be
provided on one side of the parcel. The minimum width of the
corridor shall be 20 ft.
Width of lot: 200 ft.
Visual Corridor: 40 ft.
Proposed: 45'-3", not inclusive of balconies
a PARKING:
Required: As required by Article IV, Sec. 401 of the Zoning Ordinance of
City of Miami, Florida, the amount of required parking is as
follows:
One (1) space for each efficiency or one -bedroom, and Two
(2) spaces for each two -bedroom unit or each three -bedroom
unit. In addition, one (1) space for every ten (10) units
designated for visitors.
Unit Type
Studio
One Bedroom
Two Bedroom
Three Bedroom
Mgr.'s Suite (2B)
Subtotal
Visitors
Total
GADW73646111342\0220358.01
12/22/98
Number of Units
42
210
147
21
1
421
421/10
421
Parking
Required
42
210
294
42
2
589
43
632
9
Proposed: 650 parking spaces, inclusive of 13 spaces for the physically
disabled.
OFFSTREET LOADING
Required: As required by Article IV, Supp. No. 3, Sec. 401, offstreet
loading requirements are the same as in the R-3 district.
In the R-3 district, for buildings in excess of 25,000 sq. ft. and
UP to 500,000 sq. ft. of gross building area the number of
required berths shall be as follows:
One (1) berth (12W x 35L x 15HT) for everyone hundred (100)
residential units or fraction thereof. And in addition, one (1)
berth 00W x 20L) for every thirty (30) residential units or
fraction thereof.
As per the zoning departments interpretation:
For 421 units,
400 units@1 berth/100 units=4 berths@12' wide x 35'
With 21 units remaining long x 15' high
21 units@lberth/30 units=.7=1 berth@10' wide x 20'
long
Under a Class II, we may request a special permit to reduce
the size of the berths.
Proposed: 2 berths@12' wide x 35' long x 15' high
3 berths@10' wide x 20, long
MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT:
Allowed: Unlimited
10 GADMS\73646\ 11342\0220358.01
12/22/98
4
BRICKELL BAY VILLAGE
MAJOR USE SPECIAI. PERMIT
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
ARTICLE II.
Description
A. Zoning Ordinance No. 11000
1 Section 1304.2.1 Application forms; supplementary materials
2 Section 1702.2.1 General Report
3 Section 1702.2.2 Major Use Special Permit Concept Plan
4 Section 1702.2.3 .Development Impact Study
061
BRICKELL BAY VILLAGE
MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Zoning Ordinance No. 11000
1. Section 1304.2.1 Application forms; supplementary materials
(a) Statement of ownership and control of the proposed development of activity.
The Disclosure of Ownership and Ownership Affidavit are provided in Article
I.
(b) Statement describing in detail the character and intended use of the
development of activity.
Brickell Bay Village is a rental apartment building located at 2101 - 2105
Brickell Avenue, Miami, Florida (the "Property). The development consists
of a single parcel of land with a net area of 3.27 acres. The gross lot area
is 203,336 square feet or 4.668 acres.
The Property fronts Biscayne Bay to the east and Brickell Avenue to the
west. Its neighbors are the Atlantis to the north and Bristol Tower to the
south. Currently the site contains improvement in the form of two four-story
rental apartment towers.
Brickell Bay Village will have 421 rental units. The Property will be a single
tower of 21 stories rising above a 6 level parking structure, and a ground
level with lobby, meeting rooms, rental office, and ancillary commercial and
small business center.
The Property will compliment the Brickell Avenue office and residential
districts and will contribute to the continuing development of the Downtown
Miami residential market. Residents of the Brickell Bay Village will contribute
expenditures to support retailing, restaurants, entertainment, utilization of the
Peoplemover System, enliven downtown after normal business hours and in
general, expand the quality of life in the Brickell Village area and Downtown
Miami.
The Property will have recreational amenities including a swimming pool, a
whirlpool spa and Bar-B-Que area, and landscaped areas for sunning, and
G:1DMS173646111342\0220358.01
12/22/98 6
relaxation . The Project calls for a fitness center with exercise room, lockers
and sanitary facilities, a business center, retail space and multipurpose
meeting/party rooms. The business center will not be open to the public. It
will contain meeting/conference rooms, office equipment such as computers,
printers, fax machine and copy machine.
Drawings showing the architectural character and location of the intended
use are included under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents.
A six story parking pedestal will provide 650 parking spaces. The roof of the
pedestal will house a recreation deck and jogging track.
(c) General location map, showing relation of the site or activity for which special
permit is sought to major streets, schools, existing utilities, shopping areas,
important physical features in and adjoining the project or activity and the
like.
The following exhibits are included with the Major Use Special Permit
Application and are located under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents.
i. Location Map: Map of the surrounding street system indicating the
Project location.
ii. Area Context Map: Map of the project area indicating buildings and
their functions that surround the site.
Aerial: Aerial photograph of the surrounding area indicating the
project site.
(d) A site plan containing the title of the project and the names of the project
planner and developer, date, and north arrow and , based on an exact
survey of the property drawn to a scale of sufficient size to show:
The Site plan is located as Sheet A. I under Tab 6 of the Supporting
Documents.
Boundaries of the project, any existing streets, building, watercourses,
easements and section lines;
The boundaries of the project and the location of existing streets are
shown on the survey located under Tab 5 of the Supporting
Documents.
G:MMS17364611134210220358.01
qP I2/22/98 7
f'R 7. 5�6.. 7
k
S
ii. Exact location of all buildings and structures;
The exact location of all existing buildings located on the Property is
shown on the survey located under Tab 5 of the Supporting
Documents.
The location of the building to be constructed are shown on the Site
Plan, under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents.
iii. Access and traffic flow and how vehicular traffic will be separated from
pedestrian and other types of traffic;
A detailed analysis of the site access and traffic flow for the
development is provided in the Traffic Impact Analysis located under
Tab 2 of the Supporting Documents.
Vehicular access for residents, and visitors will occur via a drive -way
from Brickell Avenue. Valet parking for visitors will be available at the
front door. For residents of the Building, ingress and egress ramps,
to the parking areas will occur off the main entrance.
Service vehicles will access the Loading Docks on the south side of
the building.
iv. Off-street parking and off-street loading area;
Off-street parking will be provided within the six (6) level parking
garage. All levels will be accessed by the ramps located off the main
entrance driveway at the main entrance to the Building.
V. Recreational facilities locations;
Recreational facilities for the development are located on a
recreational deck which is on the top level of the parking pedestal and
at the bay front. Recreational facilities are shown under Tab 6 of the
Supporting Documents.
vi. Screens and buffers;
Landscaping and buffer areas are indicated on the Landscape Plan,
under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents.
G:\DMS\73646\ 11342\0220358.01
12/22198
09 4 1
vii. Refuse collections areas;
Waste collection will be
provided by a containerized compactor
system located in the service area. These facilities are shown on the
Ground Floor Plan under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents.
viii. Access to utilities and points of utilities hookups.
Access and connections to site utilities are discussed in the Site Utility
Study located under Tab 3 of the Supporting Documents
(e) Tabulations of total gross acreage in the project and the percentages thereof
proposed to be devoted to the permitted uses and ground coverage.
203,336 gross square feet
4.66 gross acres
The various permitted uses.
Maximum permitted footprint 81,334 sq. ft.
Proposed:
Building Footprint: 44,902 gross square feet
ii. Ground coverage by structures.
Ground coverage by the structures are 22% of the total gross lot area.
(f) Tabulation showing:
The derivation of numbers of off street parking and off street loading
spaces shown in (d) above:
The minimum total number of off street parking spaces required and
the total number of spaces provided is as follows:
The minimum total number off street parking spaces required is 632.
The total number of spaces provided is 650. The off-street loading
areas shown on the ground Floor Plans of the Tower under Tab 6 of
the Supporting Documents provides 5 loading bays. Five loading bays
is the required amount under the Code. This application contains a
G:\DMS\73646\ 11342\0220358.01
12/22/98 9
' c'
request for a Class II Special Permit to change the required sizes of
the berths to four berths @ 12' wide x 35' long x 15' high and one
berth @ 10' wide x 20' long.
ii. Total project density in dwelling units per acre.
The Project contains a total of 421 Residential Rental Apartments and
3.27 net acres. The Residential project density per acre will be as
follows:
421 Units s 3.27 Net Acres = 128 dwelling units per acre.
(g) If common facilities (such as recreation areas of structures, private streets,
common open space, etc.) are to be provided for the development,
statements as to how such common facilities are to be provided and
permanently maintained.
All common facilities provided for the Residential Tower will be maintained
by the Owner.
(h) Storm drainage and sanitary sewerage plans.
Storm drainage, water distribution, waste water and solid waste generation
provisions are discussed in the Site Utility Study located under Tab 3 of the
Supporting Documents.
(i) Architectural definitions for buildings in the development; exact number of
dwelling units, size, and types, together with typical floor plans of each type.
The number of dwelling units, sizes and types, together with typical floor
plans are included under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. The Retail
Areas are shown under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. The exact page
numbers are as follows:
The development will include 421 residential units, Typical floor plans for the
residential floors are included on shees A3.04, under Tab 6 of the Supporting
Documents. The retail areas are shown on sheet under Tab 6 of the
Supporting Documents.
(j) Plans for signs, are included under Tab 6, as Sign A and Sign B.
G:\DMS173646111342\0220358.01
1 M2/98 10
A building identification sign will be located in the landscaped area at the
entrance on Brickell Avenue. All signs will be sized and styled in compliance
with the required regulations. Several Class I permits are being requested
as part of this application to satisfy the signage requirements.
(k) Landscaping plan, including types, sizes and locations of vegetation and
decorative shrubbery, and showing provisions for irrigation and future
maintenance.
The Landscaping Plan located on Sheet L-1 under Tab 6 of the Supporting
Documents, specify the plant types, sizes and locations, as well as
indications that all planted areas will be fully irrigated and maintained by the
Owner of the Residential project.
(I) Plans for recreation facilities, if any, including location and general
description of buildings for such use.
The parking pedestal has a recreational deck where recreational facilities are
provided along with a jogging track. Other amenities will be located at the
rear of the property at the bay front and will include a pool, a Jacuzzi, a
gazebo, a Bar-B-Que area and general sunning and recreation exercise
space is provided in the mezzanine level. A business center will be located
on the main floor past the lobby. The business center will not be open to the
public. It will contain meeting/conference rooms, office equipment such as
computers, printers, fax machine and copy machine.
(m) Such additional data, maps, plans, or statements as may be required for the
particular use or activity involved.
The Drawings submitted with this Application are located under Tab 6 of the
Supporting Documents.
(n) Such additional data as the applicant may believe is pertinent to the proper
consideration of the site and development plan.
Elevations and sections depicting the architectural character of the Tower
are included under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents.
2. Section 1702.2.1 General Report.
a. Property ownership or ownerships and beneficial interest within the
boundaries of the area proposed for Major Use Special Permit.
G:OW73646\ 11342%0220358.01
12/22/98 11
� LL
Statement of Ownership and beneficial interest within the boundaries of the
area proposed for Major Use Special Permit are provided in Article 1.13 & C.
b. The nature of the unified interest or control.
The nature of unified interest or control is indicated in Article 1.
C. Survey of the proposed area showing property lines and ownership.
A copy of the survey of the Property is included under Tab 5 of the
Supporting Documents.
d. Map of existing features, including streets, alleys, easements, utilities lines,
existing land use, general topography, and physical features.
The existing site features and utility lines are shown on the survey of
Property located under Tab 5 and the Site Utility Study located under Tab 3
of the Supporting Documents. In addition, the surrounding street systems are
included under Tab 2, Traffic Impact Study and an aerial photograph of the
surrounding area indicating the project site is found under Tab 5, Page 2.
e. Materials to demonstrate the relationship of the elements listed in (d)
preceding to surrounding area characteristics.
The Drawings Submitted with this Application are located under Tab S of the
Supporting Documents.
f. Existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan designations for the area
on and around the lands proposed for Major Use Special Permit.
The existing zoning designation for the Property pursuant to City of Miami
Ordinance No. 11000, as Amended is R-4. The ,Zoning Atlas Map on page
37 indicates the existing and surrounding multifamily zoning. The
comprehensive plan future land use designation for the Property is "Multi-
family High Density Residential". The zoning and comprehensive plan
designation are consistent with one another.
G:1DMS173646111342\0220358.01
12n2/98 12
3. Section 1702.2.2 Major Use Special Permit Concept Plan.
a. Relationships of the concept plan to surrounding existing and proposed
future uses. Activities, systems and facilities (transportation, recreation, view
corridors, pedestrian systems, services systems and similar uses).
Article II contains a written narrative of the Project outlining proposed uses,
activities and architectural character. This narrative also contains
descriptions of the Project's relationship to traffic, pedestrian movements„
and transportation access. Maps located on Tab 2f indicate the Project's
relationship to surrounding streets, land uses and functions. Building
elevations, sections and perspectives showing the proposed materials,
vertical profile and height, and orientation to streets is included in the
Drawings Submitted with this Application. The list of Drawings Submitted is
found under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents.
b. Existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan principles and
designations.
The Project conforms to the R-4 zoning for this Property. The comprehensive
plan future land use designation conforms with the land use designation
currently in effect for this Property.
Set back requirements under the Code are satisfied or superseded for the
proposed project. Five (5) off street loading areas are required under the
Code. Five (5) loading area are being provided.
4. Section 1702.2.3 Developmental Impact Study.
a. A traffic analysis shall be submitted for an area within approximately 1/4 mile
of the site, or an area including the major intersections to be impacted by the
site, whichever is larger.
The Traffic Impact Analysis is included under Tab 2 of the Supporting
Documents.
b. Economic impact data shall be provided, including estimates for construction
costs, construction employment, and permanent employment.
The Economic Impact Study is included under Tab 4 of the Supporting
Documents.
G:\DMS\73646\ 11342\022035 8.01
12/22/98 13
C. A housing impact assessment.
The Project will contain 421 Residential Apartment Units. The average rental
rates that are contemplated are approximately $900 per month for a studio
apartment, $1,220.00 for a one bedroom Apartment and .$1,565.00 for a
two -bedroom Apartment.
d. A description of proposed energy conservation measures shall be provided,
including only those measures that are proposed in addition to the minimum
requirements in State Energy Code.
Architecturally, the building envelope will be comprised of insulated walls and
roof. Tinted glass will be used throughout the building.
Extensive use of wall shading by means of balconies will be implemented.
Electrically, all exterior and landscape lighting will be controlled by means of
time clocks and photocell switches. Energy saving lamps, ballasts and
fixtures are being considered in all common areas.
e. Historic buildings.
There are no historic structures located on the Property.
f. Environmental zone.
The Property is not located within an environmental preservation district.
G:\DMS\73646\11342\0220358.01
12/22/98 14
L
C
11
BRICKELL BAY VILLAGE
MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
ARTICLE III.
Supporting Documents
Tab 1
Minority Construction Employment Plan
Tab 2
Traffic Impact Analysis
Tab 3
Site Utility Study
Tab 4
Economic Impact Study
Tab 5
Survey of Property
Tab 6
Drawings Submitted
11
G:\DMS\73441\10558\0220876.01
12/28/98
MINORITY CONSTRUCTION
g z'v
r tzi�:
GO
1. Construction Plan for Minority Equal Opportunity Employment
A. r 1 . The intent of applicant is to provide employment and economic opportunity
for the unemployed and economic disadvantaged residents of Miami. This will be
achieved during the various stages of the Project such as application of permit period;
Construction Period; and final operation and management of the finished project.
B. Background. The applicant of this Project, as with other projects, has always
promoted and encouraged equal employment opportunities for minorities. The same
efforts of utilizing a minority labor force in the City of Miami will be used on this
Project.
C. mil• The applicant has an Equal Employment Opportunity Plan that will be adhered
to by all firms involved in the planning, construction, and management and operation
of this Project.
The following sources will be helpful in promoting equal employment opportunities
for this Project.
Florida Department of Commerce, Division of Economic Development
The National Association of Minority Contractors
The National Minority Supplier Development Council
II. A. Goal. The intent of applicant is to provide employment and economic opportunity for
the unemployed and economic disadvantaged residents of Miami. This will be
achieved during the various stages of the Project such as application of permit period;
Construction Period; and final operation and management of the finished project.
B. Background. The applicant of this Project, as with other projects, has always
promoted and encouraged equal employment opportunities for minorities. The same
efforts of utilizing a minority labor force in the City, of Miami will be used on this
Project.
C. Plan. The applicant has an Equal Employment Opportunity Plan that will be adhered
to by all firms involved in the planning, construction, and management and operation
of this Project.
The following sources will be helpful in promoting equal employment opportunities for this
Project.
G:\DMS\73441\10558\0220876.01
12/28/98 1
Florida Department of Commerce, Division of Economic Development
Florida Department of Transportation
The National Association of Minority Contractors
The National Minority Supplier Development Council
III. Minority Contractor/Subcontractor Equal Employment Plan,
A. Goal. To promote economic opportunities for minority contractors and vendors in
the City of Miami.
B- Back___ 9ro_nd• The applicant's intent is to pursue his successful past practices of hiring
qualified minority construction contractors and subcontractors in every phase of the
construction and management of the project.
IV. The Applicant's Policy Statement for Equal Employment Opportunity.
am=
To ensure that the company's personnel policies and practices are administered equally and without
regard for race, color, religion, sex, age, national origin, handicap, or veteran status.
& is
1 • All employees and job applicants are guaranteed equality of employment opportunity. This
means that we will not discriminate against any worker or applicant on the basis ty race,
color, religion, sex, age, national origin, handicap, or veteran status.
2. All recruitment, selection, placement, training, and layoff decisions made by the Company's
supervisors or managers will be based solely on candidates job -related qualifications and
abilities.
3• All employees who apply for a promotion or transfer will be given equal consideration for
a promotion or transfer will be given equal consideration. Assuming that an opening exists,
the qualifications of a candidate for a promotion or transfer will be assessed solely on the
basis of the individuaI's ability and merit (as demonstrated by the applicant's performance
record).
4• All other personnel policies and practices of the Company, including compensation, benefits
discipline, and safety and health programs, as well as social and recreational activities, will
G:\DMS\73441\10558\0220876.01
12/28/98
2
;Jul09
u
t
be administered and conducted without regard to any individual's race, color, religion, sex,
age, national origin, handicap, or veteran status.
S. The Company will establish special programs to recruit, hire and ensure the advancement of
qualified minority group members, women, handicapped individuals and veterans.
6. The Company will take all necessary steps to ensure that each employee's work environment
is free of unlawful discrimination or harassment based on race, color, religion, sex, age,
national origin, handicap or veteran status.
C
G:\DMS\73441\10558\0220876.01
NP 12/29/98
3
a
MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT
APPLICATION
TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY
Brickell Bay Village
2101 Brickell Avenue
A11AM19 FLORIDA
Prepared for
BCOM
1110 Brickell Avenue Suite 303
Miami, Florida 33131
Prepared by
POST, BUCKLEY, SCHUH & JERNIGAN, INC.
2000 NW 107th Avenue
Miami, Florida 33172
October 30, 1998
r. s
Table of Contents to is
Section
�
r
}
1.0
INTRODUCTION
1
2.0
EXISTING CONDITIONS
1
2.1 Jtoadway Characteristics
1
2.2 Traffic Volumes
1
2.3 Existing Signal Timing Plans
7
2.4 Mass Transit
7
2.5 Accident Data
i
3.0
PROJECT TRAFFIC
9
3.1 Committed Development Traffic
9
3.2 Background Traffic
9
3.3 Project Trip Generation
13
3.4 Programmed and Planned Roadway Improvements
13
4.0
TRAFFIC MPACT ANALYSIS
17
4.1 Arterial Level of Service Analysis
17
4.2 Intersection Level of Service Analysis
17
4.3 Person Trips Capacity Analysis
20
4.4 Site Access
20
5.0
CONCLUSIONS
23
APPENDIX
Traffic Volume Counts
Signal Phasing and Timing Information
Accident Data
Trip Generation Data
Transit Information
ART —TAB Arterial LOS Worksheets
Intersection LOS Worksheets
Site Plan
ii
N
RE
List of Figures
is
1 Project Location Map
2 Project Study Area
3 Existing PM Peak Hour Volumes
4 Committed Development Trip Distribution
5
Background 1999 Traffic Volumes
6 Project Trip Distribution
Total 1999 Traffic Volumes
List of Tables
TAbk 1hk
1 Existing Traffic Volumes
2 Accident Summary
3 Committed Development Trip Generation
4 Project Trip Generation
5 Arterial Level of Service Analysis
PM Peak Hour
6 Intersection Level of Service Analysis
7 Person Trips Capacity P P ty Analysis
Brickell Avenue
8 Person Trips Capacity Analysis
S, Miami Avenue
iii
Ew
2
3
6
11
12
15
16
Eau
5
8
10
14
18
19
21
22
1.0 INTRODUCTION
This report presents the findings of the traffic analysis conducted for the Brickell Bay Village,
a proposed high-rise rental development located at 2101 Brickell Avenue in Miami, Florida (See
Figure 1). The existing site contains one building with 144 rental units. The proposed plan of
i development would raze the existing building and construct a new 21-story building which is
planned to have 421 rental units. Vehicle access to the site would be to and from Brickell Avenue.
The proposed site plan is contained in the Appendix.
I
In order to receive development approval, a traffic analysis must be conducted for the project.
{ The purpose of this study is to satisfy the City of Miami Department of Planning and Development .
f
a requirements for a Major Use Special Permit Application.
2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS
2.1 Roadway Characteristics
The traffic impact study area is bounded on the north by SE 13th Road, on the east by Brickell
Avenue (US1), on the south by SE 26th Road and on the west by S. Miami Avenue (see Figure
2). In the direct vicinity of the project study area, Brickell Avenue is a four -lane divided roadway
a oriented in the north -south direction. The posted speed limit is 40 miles per hour (MPH). SE
13th Road is a four -lane undivided roadway oriented in the east -west direction. S. Miami Avenue
is a four -lane divided roadway oriented in the north -south direction. The posted speed limit is 35
MPH. SE 26th Road is a four -lane divided roadway oriented in the east -west direction.
t
2.2 Traffic Volumes
Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) data were available for 1997 from the Florida Department
of Transportation (FDOT) for Brickell Avenue.
.r:
1
0
R
@
N
I --F� BRICEELL BAY VILLAGE FIGURE
TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY LOCATION MAP
etyj- 061
c
11
BRICEELL BAY VILLAGE
TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY
ION
ROADWAY SEGMENT
PROJECT FIGURE
STUDY AREA 2
!1
N
H
The following AADT data were collected and are as follows:
t
l 18,600 vehicles per day (vpd); 200 feet south of S. Miami Avenue
' 25,000 vpd; 200 feet north of Rickenbaker Causeway
• 23,000 vpd; 200 feet south of SE 13th Road
a In addition, a 24-hour bi-directional machine traffic count was conducted on S. Miami Avenue,
—� between SE 25th Road and SE 15th Road The daily volume was recorded as 5,947 vpd.
The existing traffic volume data are contained in Table 1. The machine traffic count summary
sheets are contained in the Appendix.
.a
N
Turning volumes were collected at the following intersections:
Brickell Avenue and S. Miami Avenue
• Brickell Avenue and SE 26th Rd.
• Brickell Avenue and SE 2451
• Brickell Avenue and SE 15th Rd.
• Brickell Avenue and SE 13th Rd.
• S. Miami Avenue and SE 26th Rd.
• S. Miami Avenue and SE 25th Rd.
The counts were collected from 4:00 to 6:00 PM as suggested by the City's staff. The existing
traffic volumes are summarized in Figure 3. The turning movement worksheets are contained in
( the Appendix. The hourly turning movement volumes were determined by calculating the average
of the two consecutive peak hour turning movement counts. Thus, they represent the peak hourly
volumes during the PM peak period.
4
TABLE I
EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES
AADT
DIIV
Directional Peak (tour Volume
Roadway
Count Location
NB/EB
SB/WB
Total
NB/EB
SB/WB
Total
NB/ER
SB/WB
Total
200 ft south of S.
Brickell Avenue
Miami Avenue
10,500
8,100
18,600
966
745
1,711
514
311
825
200 ft north of
Rickenbacker
Brickell Avenue
Causeway
12,500
12,500
25,000
1,150
1,150
2,30b
546
546
1,093
200 ft south of SE
Brickell Avenue
13th Rd
10,500
12,500
23,000
966
1,150
2,116
422
590
1.012
Between SE 15th
Road and SE 25th
S. Miami Avenue
Road
3,499
2,44$
5,947
446
568
1,014
223
284
507
Notes:
1. Brickell Avenue Data obtained from Florida Department of Transportation
Design Hour K-Factor = 0.092
Design Hour Volume (DHV) = AADT * K-Factor
PHF = 0.95
D = Proportion of peak hour traffic in peak direction
Peak Hour Volume = DHV * 0.95 * D
2. S. Miami Avenue Data obtained from 24-hour birectional machine traffic count on 10/15/98
Gt7
f
Ng
��f� rn d►i� 9T6
1%
84
a NTS
go
17 RD 56-0 htn
t-- 197 Be �, �in�°
4 1 i s SE 18 RD 18 RD
41n r *rt�
12 NLn
SE 19 RD Q
SE 20 RD Q
x� SE 21 RD J PROJECT
_ SE 22 RD `le SITE
u�r4iv � 44 U '
~n' 6 "' Lo m i BISCAYNE BAY
5 J' tits
764 SE 25 RD KER CSW`(
SE 26 RD a gIC�
SE 27 RD - 17
' _ j 1► ,� 34
SE 28 RD
SE 29 RD oNti
SE 30 RO
N R.%°0 SE 31 RD
��„ �j��9 SE 32 R 32 D o
_� 1 i 3s0
dye `° J �' 76e
6 17 -0
3�
BRICKELL BAY VILLAGE FIGURE
TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY STING TRAFFIC VOLUMES
PM PEAK
3
m
� R Y
C
2.3 Existing Signal Timing Plans
Existing signal phasing and timing plans for the signalized intersections identified in the study area
were obtained from Miami -Dade County Traffic Control Center. These timings were used in
analyzing existing levels of service.
2.4 Mass Transit
The project area is served by several Metro -Bus routes. Metro -Bus Route schedules and monthly
boardings information were obtained from the Metro -Dade Transit Agency. Metro -Bus Routes
B and 48 serve Brickell Avenue and Metro -Bus Route 12 serves S. Miami Avenue. Metro Bus
headway ranges from 15 to 50 minutes during peak hours. The seating capacity is 40
passengers/bus. Buses along Brickell Avenue on Route B operate every 15 minutes in the morning
and afternoon peak periods, while Bus Route 48 operates 1. bus for each hour in the morning and
afternoon peak periods. The project site area is served by 2 buses per hour each in the morning
and afternoon peak periods for Bus Route 12. Thus, 5 buses serve the Brickell Avenue corridor
during the morning and afternoon peaks and 4 buses serve the S. Miami Avenue corridor during
the morning and afternoon peak periods.
2.5 Accident Data
Traffic crash data collected for Brickell Avenue were obtained from the FDOT State Safety Office.
The crash data limits are on Brickell Avenue from S. Miami Avenue to SE 13th Street. Traffic
data recorded for the most recent three-year period (1995-1997) are summarized in Table 2.
Over the three-year analysis period, the 1.3-mile section of Brickell Avenue from S. Miami
Avenue to SE 13th Street recorded an average of 52 crashes per year with the highest year being
7
09
TABLE 2
ACCIDENT SUMMARY
Brickell Avenue (US1)
From S. Miami Avenue to SE 13 Street
Traffic Crash Summary Severity (1995-1997)
Property
Damage
Fatal Crashes
Injury Crashes Crash Total Crashes
Number of Number of Number of Number of Number of Number of Number of Number of Number of
Year Crashes Fatalities Injuries Crashes Injuries Crashes Crashes Fatalities Injuries
1995 0 0 0
1996 0 0 0 21 31 28 46 0 31
1997 000
0 0 27 30 22 43 0 30
38 40 67 0 38
tc
rO
1997 (76 crashes) and the lowest year 1996 (43 crashes). Of this total, approximately 19 percent
Y PP
occurred during the PM peak period.
-t
The proposed Brickell Bay Village would add 51 new vehicle trips to Brickell Avenue during the
PM peak period. This number represents approximately 2.60 percent of the existing PM peak
l volume on Brickell Avenue. The proposed Brickell Bay Village redevelopment is not expected
to cause an increase in the traffic crash rate on Brickell Avenue. In addition, the Brickell Bay
Village site plan proposes adjustments to the existing median opening to allow left turn movements
in and out of the site which would reduce the potential traffic conflicts.
:- 3.0 PROJECT TRAFFIC
1 3.1 Committed Development Traffic
0 Included in this analysis is the impact of future projects in this area of Miami which have been
approved but not yet built. This information was obtained from the City of Miami Department
of Planning & Development. The committed development trip generation is summarized in Table
3. Trip assignments for these projects (Figure 4) were accomplished using information contained
in various traffic impact studies prepared for the projects.
3
3.2 Background Traffic
In order to estimate background traffic growth, existing traffic volumes were projected to the
proposed buildout year 1999 by applying a 2 % annual growth rate obtained from the City of
Miami. Trips generated by the committed developments depicted in Figure 4 were added to the
1999 background growth to arrive at total 1999 background traffic volumes (Figure 5).
s
i
9
i
Approved Development
TABLE 3
COMMITTED DEVELOPMENT TRIP GENERATION
PM Peak Hour
Brickell on the River
27 SE Sth St.
Out
508 Apartment Units
Brickell Bay Front Club
185 SE 14Terr
325
297 Hotel Rooms
ment
Apart —Units
166
109
78
92
.� Yacht Club at Brickell
1111 S. Bayshore Dr.
356 Apartment Units
4
Brickell Bay Plaza
Between SE 12th St. & SE
72
72
46
12th Terr
639 Apartment Units
7,452 sq. ft Quality Restaurant
123
22
79
9
3
5.149 sq. ft Retail
6
3
Bayshore Palms
Between SE 12th St. & SE
14th St.
749 Apartment Units
9,500 sq. ft Retail
160
7
99
10
Terremark II/Millennium
1435 Brickell Ave.
7,357 sq. ft Quality Restaurant
29
13
426 Hotel Roo ms
126
112
190 Apartment Units
42
27
6,696 sq. ft Retail
5
7
205,200 Sq.ft Office
47
231
j J-W.Marriott/Barclay's
1111 Brickell Ave.
Bank 2 Lanes
3OO Hotetl R
10
11
Financial Center at Brickell
omss
118
101
+ Brickell Point
t
401 Brickell Ave.
500,000 sq. ft. Office Bldg
at
599 Apartment Units
110
530
4,000 sq. ft Retail
131
7
80
7
Yacht Club I1
-
S. Bayshore & SE 12th St.
4,000 sq.ft Quality Restaurant
355 Apartment Units
16
7
8,700 sq.ft Office
73
14
45
66
3,900 sq.ft Quality Restaurant
19
g
a TOTALS
705 sq.ft Retail
1
1
1,514
1,710
a
f
s
Source:
City of Miami, Approved Traffic Impact Studies and ITE Report Trip Generation, 5th Edition
10
201
149
_ 8
202
31
9
259
17
42
238
12
278
21
219
640
211.
14
23
118
80
27
2
�4 t ,6
4; so
-+--+ � 1�
sow, N
NTS
Ilk `
Win o
*14 c�)
17 RD 2 coo
18 RD
U '
SE 19 RD m
SE 20 RD PROJECT
SE 21 RD ,r,
SITE
SE 22 RD
_ a
Lin can
R �5�
SE 25 RD �ICK�NgACKE
SE 26 RDcn
a _
SE 27 RD o
SE .28 RD
SE 29 RD � B ISCAYNE BAY
SE 30 RD
SE 31 RD
32 ,t Is.
/32 D coo �j
"Q� 4-0
1 S
�1�► 1 �► o
0042 8"�
,t O��
9� �t O-,,A
O
BRICKELL BAY VILLAGE COMMITTED DEVELOPMENT FIGURE
TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY TRIP DISTRIBUTION
PM PEAK 4
11 v9 ���
fA,,
17 RD
Ay � y d6
159
2 Mow
146 Mho
NTS
o+� t22
Kati �' 106
51 ttnww
t
i
t
r
3.3 Project
i J Trip Generation
Project trip generation was based on the Institute of t' Gen ra inn, Transportation Engi
neers Report _MP,6th Edition. Residential using trips were calculated
P g Land Use 222 High -Rise
1 Apartment. Site traffic was derived from the net difference between the Proposed
r and the existing land use. The existing residential trips P redevelopment
P were
Low -Rise A calculated using
Apartment. Land Use 221
. The location and type of the proposed site are favorable for various transit
modes. Consistent with other traffic studies in the area, the project trips
! a 3 % reduction to account for transit traffic. Project traffic was the Were adjusted to reflect
the study area roadways using the Cardinal Directional Distribution
distributed and assigned to
on obtained from the Miami
Urban Area Transportation Stud
1 y (MUATS) as shown below. A trip contained in Table 4. generation summary is
i'
i
NORTH
Nam' NNE
19.63% 38.87%
Cardinal Directional Distribution for TAZ 671
EAST
ENE I ESE
j�37.�0.4 %
SOUTH
SSE1ssw.1.19%
WEST
WSW W
17.02% 17.Z
Project traffic was distributed and assigned to the study area as shown in
generated by the proposed site was added to background traffic to develo t
Figure 6. Traffic
volumes as shown in Figure 7. P 1999 traffic
3A Planned and Programmed Roadway Improvements
A review of the 1998 Miami -Dade County Metropolitan Planning Improvement Program TIP shows no Tanned orProgrammedg Organization Roadway
g ( ) P
project study area. roadway improvements in the
13
"� V o l
TABLE 4
PROJECT TRIP GENERATION
PM Peak Period
Land Use Description
Vehicle Trips
Units Weekday
PM Peak Hour
Total
_
222
High -Rise A artment
In Out
Total
SUBTOTAL
421 1,785
88 57
145
Adjustments
1,785
88 ` 57
145
Existing Units Low -Rise Apartment
►r
3 % Transit Trips
144 -1,123
-61 -31
-92
Net New Vehicle Trips
-20
-1 -1
-2
640
26 25
51
)urce:
'E Report Trip Generation, 6th Edition
S�D
z
A
BISCAYNE BAY
.'ro c-';V
BRICKELL BAY VILLAGE FIGURE TRAFFIC PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION
, I PROJECT T
IMPACT STUDY
PM
PM PEAK
6
15
NTS
H
'%was
*_ 276
e 159
230
146
NTS
60
1 6
r%cn 16
5 01
2 20,
5
E-0
22
19
A 49 49
9G
4 V* 225
C-AIR
19
+��
sit?
608
779
or-r-
r
s sr
4.0 TRAFFIC AIPACT ANA
LYSIS
3 4•I Arterial Level of Service Analysis
A level of service (LOS) analysis was conducted for the following roadway segments:
i
1 • Brickell Avenue from SE 13th Road to S. Miami Avenue
2. South Miami Avenue from Brickell Avenue (US1) to SE 15th Road
x
f The analysis was conducted using T the FDO ART —TAB TAB version 2.0 Arterial Level of Service
i Analysis software. The analysis was conducted for PM peak hour traffic conditions. The analyses
L
were conducted for existing year 1998 and buildout year 1999 of the proposed project with and
^` without the redevelopment. The traffic characteristics used in the analysis were obtained from the
machine traffic counts contained in the Appendix. The results of the analysis are summarized in
Table 5. The LOS worksheets are contained in the Appendix.
4.2 Intersection Level of Service Analysis
Level of service analyses were conducted for the critical signalized
lma intersections within the project
study area. The analyses were conducted for existing year 1998 and buildout year 1999 of the
j proposed project based on PM peak period traffic conditions with and without the proposed site.
The analysis was conducted following the procedures and methodologies of the SIGNAL94
f
Software. This program implements the capacity analysis techniques of the 1994 update to the
Highway Capacity Manual for signalized intersections. The results of the intersection analyses
are summarized in Table 6. The computer summary sheets are contained
in the Appendix.
17
Roadway
From
Number
LOS E
Peak Hou
Peak Hour
Brickell Avenue
S. Miami Avenue
TO
of Lanes
r
Capacity
Volume
S. Miami Avenue
U51
SE 23th Street
4
3,010
WC LOS
SE 25th Rd
4
1,960
0.65 C
Background 1999 AM Peak Hour
1,540
574
0.37 E
Roadway
►0
From
Number
LOS E
Peak Hour
Peak Hour
� Brickell Avenue
S. Miami Avenue
TO
of Lanes
Capacity
Volume
S. Miami Avenue
US1
SE 23th Street
4
3,010
V/C LOS
SE 25th Rd
4
2,309
0.77 C
Total 1999 AM Peak
1,540
S85
0 38
Hour
E
RoadtAvcnuEe
From To
BrickS. Miami Avenue5. MiSE 23th Street
US1 SE 25th Rd
Source: FDOT LOS Software ART TAB Version 2.0
Number
of Lanes
09596
4
4
V/C
0.65
30 9
LOS
C_
E
0
0
ON)
Location
Brickell Ave & S. Miami Ave
Brickell Ave & SE 26th Rd
Brickell Ave & SE 2451
Brickell Ave & SE 15th Rd
Irickell Ave & SE 13th St
Miami Ave & SE 26th Rd
Miami Ave & SE 251h Rd
Source: SIGNAL94
TABLE 6
INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE
_
PM PEAK HOUR
1998
19"
19"
Existing
Without Project
With Project
Avg Stop
Avg Stop
Avg Stop
Delay
Delay
Delay
(sec/veh) LOS
(sec/veh) LOS
(sec/veh) LOS
33.6 D
37.8 D
37.9 D
28.9 D
40.3 E
20.3 C
10.8 B
11.1 B
11.3 g
9.3 B
11.5 B
11.6 B
17.1 C
37.1 D
37.1 D
28.1 D
28.7 D
28.7 D
9,8 B
9.5 g
9.6 B
19
4.3 Person Trips' Capacity Analysis
6
Tables 7 and 8 summarize the results of the person trip capacity analysis for BrickeI and S. Miami
+ Avenues. Peak hour person trips were calculated by multiplying
the peak hour vehicle volume
(vph) with the occupancy rate. The City of Miami Planning & Development office has established
an average occupancy ratio of 1.4 person trips per vehicle. Mass transit peak hour person trips
-� were arrived by multiplying the typical passengers carrying demand with the total number of
r' arrivals/departures in the peak hour for both directions.
i
It is assumed that 3 % of the project trips would use transit to access the site. Future transit trips
were estimated by applying 1Yin 3 % to the net new project trips and then converting vehicle trips to
person trips by applying the 1.4 occupancy rate. Peak hour capacity (vph) is the average vehicle
carrying capacity during the PM peak period. While the peak hour capacity for transit was
calculated by multiplying the bus capacity (40 passengers) times the number of buses. Bus
scheduling information for Brickell Avenue and S. Miami Avenue are provided in the Appendix.
Tables 7 and 8 show that in 1999 with the project traffic, the combined person
automobile and transit exceeds the person trips demand during the peak hour.trips capacity for
t
4.4 Site Access
The proposed development is planned to use the existing two driveways on Brickell Avenue. The
existing median opening adjacent to the site would be adju
sted to allow full access at the southern
driveway. The northern driveway would provide right-in/right-out movements only. A site plan
is contained in the Appendix.
20
TABLE 7
PERSON TRIPS CAPACITY ANALYSIS
BRICKELL AVENUE
Vehicle Transit
1998 Existing 1999 With Project 1998 Existing 1999 With Project 19 )8 Existing Total W
Peak Hour g tth Project
Volume 1,960
2,360 10 10
Occupancy 1,970 2,370
Rate 1.4
1.4 NA NA `
Peak Hour - _
Person
Trips 2,744
3,304 142 145
Peak Hour 2,886 3,449
Capacity
(vph)
3,010 3,640
Peak Hour
Capacity
(Person
Trips) 4, 214
5,096 40Q
Notes: 400 4,614 5,496
1. Transit Peak Hour volume based on number of buses on bus routes
2. Transit Peak Hour Person Trips based on information obtained from Metro -Dade Transit Agency
3. Transit Peak Hour Capacity based on 40 passengers seating capacity times the number of buses
4. Existing Vehicle Capacity based on ART —TAB
5. Future Vehicle Capacity increases due to signal optimization (ART TAB)
1998 Existing
1999 With Project
1998 Existing ~ 1999 With Project
Total
1998
Pear Hour
Existing 1999 With Project
'Volume
507
523
4
Occupancy
4 511 527
Rate
AMk
Peak Hour
1.4
1.4
IAA NA - _
Person
Trips
710
732
40
40 750 ---
Peak Hour
Capacity
1,540 1,540
Peak Hour
Capacity
(Person
Trips) 2,156
29156 160 160
Notes:
2,316
1. Transit Peak Hour volume based on number of buses on bus routes
2. Transit Peak Hour Person Trips based on information obtained from Metro -Dade Transit Agency
3. Transit Peak Hour Capacity based on 40 passengers seating capacity times the number of buses
4. Vehicle Capacity based on ART TAB
�n
2,316
T
i
An analysis of the proposed unsignalized intersection of the main acce
ss on Brickell Avenue was
conducted for the PM peak. The analysis shows that the intersection will operate at a level of
service A. It is estimated that the access point on Brickell Avenue will have no impact on the thru
° traffic. The computer summary sheets are contained in the Appendix.
5•0 CONCLUSIONS
The proposed high-rise development would add approximately 51 new vehicle trips to the area
roadways during the PM peak period The impact of the new site trips to the adjacent streets are
expected to be minimal. Based on the arterial and intersection LOS analyses, the proposed project
would not cause significant traffic impacts to the adjacent roadway network.
The arterial LOS analysis indicated that all critical segments within the study area would operate
at LOS C or better with or without the proposed project on Brickell Avenue. S. Miami Avenue
would operate at a level of service E with or without the proposed development.
The intersection Ievel of service analysis shows that nearby signalized intersections would at an acceptable level of service with or without the proposed development, Optimization of the
signal timings at the intersection of Brickell Avenue & SE 26th Rd would reduce the delay
location. The modified timing patterns could be accomplished without changing cycle len t thus
g�,
f while providing a better timing balance based on future traffic demands at the intersection. Based
on the optimized signal tuning, the study location was analyzed and the results are depicted in
Table 6. This location would operate at a level of service C.
1
1
0
23
APPENDEK
r7N
L't
(I
st 1 7 — �') (3 1.
Traffic Volume Counts
I
H
CROSSROADS ENG"INS DATA, INC
CLIDtt : mil. INC. 13255 SW 13M AVM. SUITE 207 Study Nam SPI245IR
JDP NO,: 98-14a N1AI11. FLORIDA 33186 Site Code : 000@8888
COM ' DADE TEL: NS-233-3997 FAY- 305-233-7720 Start Date: 18/19/99
PROJECT: BRTCKELL AVENUE DATA Paoe I 1
AUTO
IBRIELL AVE1JlIE
ISE 2451/8RICKELL BAY
18RTCKELL AVENUE
ISE 2451/
BRICKELL I1RY
IFr" Nnr+h
IFrov East
IFroa South
IFrov West
Start 1
I
_ Tire I Right
Thru
Left
PEDSI Right
Thru
Left
I
PEDSI Right
Thri
Left
I
PEDSI Right
Thru
Left
Ilntvl.
PEDSI
Total
MOM 0
16:151 0
261
265
12
5
21
21
7
0
7
31
8
179
0
121
0
@
@
01
491
16:301 0
E31
10
@1
3
5
0
0
9
f5
11
11
212
0
21
0
@
@
81
510
16:451 @
25I
7
31
1
@
4
11
17
174
@
01
@
@
@
@I
453
_
Hourl 0
1009
34
71
16
0
35
11
61
14
50
_ 18A
751
@
11
0
p _
@
61
468
0
151
0
1
I
I
I
0
@
01
1922
17:001 A
17:151 0
425
384
6
8
111
6
0
14
21
13
229
0
I
01
0
0
0
I
01
706
17:301 0
379
5
01
!i
5
4
@
@
6
0I
11
191
0
@1
0
0
@
61
605
17:451 _ P
363
12
- —.1
51
2
@
5
7
181
121
9
f4
212
169
0
8
01
@I
0
0
0
01
633
Nouri A
1551
171
17
_
0
_
32
321
47
792
0
@
0
01
575
0
81
0
I
i
0
0
01
2519
r
Totatl 0
nor. I —
2559
96.6
65
2.4
241
33
0
67
I
381
97
1543
0
i
151
0
0
0
I
@1
4441
'
>< Int. I —
57.6
1.4
0.91
0.51
23.9
0.7
—
48.5
27.51
5.8
93.2
—
0.91
—
—
1.5
0.81
2.1
34.7
—
@.31
—
-
-
-
50,
J
CLIENT s PMIJ, INC.
TDB NO.: 98-142
COUNTY , DADE
PROJECT, BRICRELL AVENUE DATA
CROSSROADS EIGINEERINB DATA, INC
13255 Sit 137TH AVENUE, SUITE 2!7 Study Nam8R12451R
MIAMI, FLORIDA 33186 _ TE1: 385433-3997 FAX: 385-233-7728 Site Codes 89888888Start Date: 19/19/98
Pace
: 2
AUTO
IBRIMELL AVENUE
iFror North
ISE 2451/BR1CIiELL BAY
IBRICKELL AVENUE
51/
ISE 2451/ BRICKEII BAY
Start
I
IFroe East
I
IFroa South
IFor West
Ti at I Right Thru Left PEDSI R3 ht Thru Left
Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for
I
PEDSI Ri ht Thru
Left
1
PEDSI Right Thru Left
PEDSIITotal
Tier
1 1704
the Period:
IWO on 19/19/98 to 17:45
on 10/19/98
I
Vol.
1 8 1551
31
1 17:11
171 17 8 32
321 17.47 792
8
17
Pet.
Total
1 0.0 96.9
1 1549
1.9
1.91 20.9 8. 8 39- 5
39. 51 5.6 94.3
0.0
81 8 8 8
8.01 8. 8 9.9 9.9
81
8.11
Hich
1 17:81
1 81
117:38
1 839
17.13
I 8
I
Vol.
1 8 425
6
111 4 a 5
181 229
8
81 17:00 8 8
Total
1 442
1 27
1 242
8
81
PHF
1 1.914
1 1.758
18.867
I 8
11.1@0
1
1
@
Inbound
^mtInomnd
0 Total
0
BRICKELL AVENUE
@ 1551 31 17
792
809
Ynbound 1 199
0Lltbound 809
Total 2408
0
@
Inhound 839
0,!tbound 1583
Total 2422
1551 0 792
32
1583
BRICKELL A ENUE
0
Inbound 81
Clut bound 78 32
Total 159
4
47
.31 78
SE 2451/BRTr_KELL SAY
CLIENT : PBStJ. INC.
CROSSROADS ENSINFERIN6 DATA. INC
'rop NO'' 98-l+2
132M SW 13M AVENUE, SUITE 217
Study Hart:
BRI�45lR
COLWY : DOPE
MIAMI. FLORIDA 33186
TEL: 385-233-3997 FAX: 305-233-7720
Site Code : 00808888
PROJECT: PRICKELL AuENE DATA
Start Date:
19/19/98
PRICKELL BAY CLUB
Pane
t
IPRIEVELL oVENUE
IFrot North
ISE 2451/PRTCRELL
BAY IBRICHELL AVENUE
USE 245i/
BRICKELL BAY
1
Start I
IFrnt Eoet IFror South
I
IFror West
Tite 1 Rioht Thru
16/11/98
Left
PEDSI R L_
1
I
Thru Left PEDSI Riaht Thru
Left
I
PEDSI Riaht
Thru
Left
PEDSIITotal
16:881 8 0
16:T51 8 0
3
1
01 3
01
1
0 7 01 3 0
8
1
81
0
8
0
81 16
16:381 0 0
4
1
81 0
0 6 01 4 8
8 14 81 4 0
0
01
0
0
0
81 12
0
-01
8 11 g A
0
A
01
8
0
0
81 22
Hourl 0 8
8
�4 --
___—AI
- 0 —
38 8l 19 8
0
PI
_ .
8!
0
_... _.
0
0
8
AI 19
0
8
81 69
1 17;801 0 1
17:151 0 8
2
0
81 2
01
8 c^2 81 1 0
0
01
0
0
0
01 28
17:301 0 0
4
e
01 3
0 14 81 a 0
0 5 81 18 0
0
81
0
0
0
01 24
17:651 _-0- -- W
--1_4
—RI____
RI_ 0
0
0
01
8
0
8
81 22
Hourl� 0 1
7
81 8
-0
0 51 8I 28 0
0
01
01
0
8
0
0! 21
1
i
0
0
0
01 95
Total) 8 1
% Am I - 6.2
IS
93.7
81 12
-1 11.8
0 89 01 47 0
-
®
I
01
8
0
0
I
01 lb4
d Tnt. I - 0.6
9.1
-I 7.3
-
- 54.2 -1 28.6 -
- rye
,,
I
CLIENT : PBStJ, 1NC.
J09 NO.: 98-142
COUNTY . DADE
oROJECT: BRICKELL AVEMIE DATA
die ! t '� � .p�.a � ..• . t S i���
CROSSROADS ENSINEERING w. r DA INC� .�..
13255 SW 13M AVENUE SUITE 2r7
Study Male: B 1245ip
MIANt. FLORIDA 33186 Site Code : 0080M
TEL.- 305-233-3997 FAX: 385--233-7728 Start Date: 19/19/98
Page : 2
BRICKELL BAY CLUB
IBRICKELL PYRE
ISE 2451/8RICKELL BAY
IBRICKELL AVENUE
ISE 2451/ BRICKELL BAY
IFror North
[Fro* East
IFror South
IFror West
Start
I
I
Tire
I Right Thru Left __P9S1
Right Thru Left
I
PEDSI Right Thru Left
I
PEDSI Right Thru
Left
Iintyl.
PEDSI Total
Peak Nour Analysis Pv Entire Intersection for the Period:
16:00 on 10/19/98 to 17:45 on 10/19/98
I
Tire
117:00
1 17:00
1 1700
1 17:00
I
Vol.
1 A 1 7
01 8 0 51
01 28 8
0
01 0 0
0
01
Pct.
Total
1 0.0 12.5 87.5
0.0I 13.5 0.0 86.4
0.01 ISO.@ 9.0
0.9
8.01 0.0 0.9
0.0
0.81
1 8
1 59
1 28
1 0
1
High
1 17:30
1 17:00
1 17:30
1 17:30
I
Vol.
Total
1 0 e 4
1 4
81 2 0 22
01 10 a
0
01 8 0
a
01
PHF
10.500
1 24
1 0.615
1 10
1 0.780
1 0
1 0. ON
1
I
BRICKELL PAY CI_UB
Q Inboi_tnd
^utInoi.trid
Total
0
0
2RICKELL AVENUE
t 7 8
8
Inbolmd 8
0utbond 8
To al 16
Inbound 28
01.ttbound 52
Total 80
1 - 0 0
51
52
BRICKELL A ENUE
Inhomnd 59
01-It b o l.tn d 35
Total 94
28
8
m
51
28
7
35
SE 2451/BRICKELL RAY
Umm" DMINEERIND 'URN VC
WENT t PBSU, INC.
X2 ND.: W142
132M SM 13M AVDIIE�- SUITE W
Study Nave: MIC13RD
PR= MIDRL AVM DATA
NIPXI, "IDA 33116
TEL: (315)233-3991 FAIs 138M233-7728
Site Code : 98154118
CMINTY MM
Start Date:
10/15/98
AUTM, HEAVY VEHIMEs
Page
1BRIDUL AYME
Wros North
ISE 13TH ROAD
IRRICKELL AVRE
ISE 13TH ROAD
Start I
IFrom East
I
I Fros South
IFrom Nest
Tise I RiQht..,.,.
1011,5198
Thru
Left
PEDSI Riaht
Thru
I
Left MI Right Thru
Left
I
PEDSI Right
Thru
Left
. I Intyl.
PEDSI Total
1601 49
16:131 73
159
166
7
13
81
18
13
25
9 01 11 115
24
91
18
24
42
1
01 493
16-.381 62
185
7
of
18
23
43
16 01 7 116
22
23
01
17
le
47
Of sm
16:451 70
�10
4 4
of
9
30
@1 7 146
16 01 r 138
29
25
01
01
9
7
34
Of 532
Hourf 256
729
38
Of
42
Idl
63 Of 31 515
92
81
26
78
8
35
01 593
-
I
I
51
158
of 2166
..j
17:001 73
17:151 %
198
234
11
2
01
of
18
59
1
19 11 8 153
12
1
Of
22
17
49
1
81 632
t
17:381 103
247
7
01
5
12
69
55
47 01 4 143
34
31
81
27
18
, 55
01 731
1
j ---
17 451 96
280
a
01
9
47
Of 7 162
3a 5
23
01
25
14
49
Of 738
Hour! 368-
959
28
8 1
36
230
130
138 11 24 5M
34
too
of
Of
24
-9
52
01 724
1
1
98
59
205
Of 2825
Total 1 624
% Apr- 1 26.2
16M
78.9
66
2.7
01
-1
78
12.5
351
56.3
193 1
9 11 '55 1183
192
1
81
168
109
363
1
of 4991
% Int. I I&S
33.8
1.3
-1
1.5
7.0
.38. 0.11 4.0 81.7
3.8
14.2
-1
26.2
17.0
56.7
-1 1.1 22.1
3.8
-1
3-3
2.1
7.2
t
t PBSiJ, IN„
EEIMEERIl6 DATA, INC .,- .1..
-.. `''� ,'_•
�10.
t 98-142
I= SW 13M AVENUE, SUITE 287
•.
t BRICIM AVENIE DATA
MIAM19 FlARIDA 33186
TEL., (385)233-3997 FAX: (385)233-7728
Study lot so
Site Lodi t lg�$441
: DADE
Start Dafrt.liV15/9A
IBRIp(E1.L. AVENIE
AUtOS,FEAVY VEHICLES
page.
ys;'Z
•+
IFror North
1SE ISM ROAD
IFror East IBRICKELL AVENUE ISE 15TN ROAD
,
start
I
( IFror South IFroo West
Tire 1 Right .Thw.ru Left PEDSI Ri Right Thru Left PEDSI Ri ht Thru Left PEDSI Ri Right Thru
` Peak Nour Analysis 8y Entire Intersection for the Period: 16:88 on 18/15/98 to 17:45 on 18/i5/98
Tire 117�88
Left llntvl.
PEDSI Total
r
Vol.
1 .47
1483 27
1
Pct.
1 3.8
95.8 1.7
Total
1 1561
High
1 17:38
V01.
1 18
395 7
Total
1 412
PW
1 8.947
'AUTOS
"HEAVY
VEHICLES
4
¢
J
iKU
47
140
48
45
18
18
'" 0
s '
Inbound
t
u t b o u n d
62
Total
t
62
0
i
3
89
'
i
89
0
S
~8
..
gg
I
1 17:88
41 16
1 17:88
1 17:M I
48 115
421 8. 7 26.2 62.8
41 69 518
a l l 19.8 88.1
45 121 89 62 18 81
7. 8 1.81 58.2 35. 8
1 183
f 636
18.1 4.51
1 177
117:88
81 8
117:s'0
l
17:266
14 27
I 50,
11 28 132
11 41 16 9 21
1 0.915
1 8.167
1 53 1
18.835 1
BRICKELL AVENUE
47 -1482 27 16
0 1 0 510
=47= ----- __--= 18
1483 27
544
Inbound .1J61
Outbound 544
Total 2105
177
140
317
0
16
48
0
48
Inbound 18�
Outbound 158
- 114
Total 341
" 1
115
69
62
158
Inbound 636
Outbound 1687
Total 2.32.3
89 45 508 6S
1483 0 2 0
45 510 69
1687
BRICKELL A ENUE
i
27
SE 15TH ROAD
12 -
0 /I\
i2 I
North
N
CROMM ENS {.
u�1a nRtp, �'INc
CLIENT : Powl INC- 132M SW 137TH AVENIE,' omits w Study Nave: MIC2451
JM NO.: 98-142 N1AMI, FLORIDA 33186 Site Code : 88008808
PROJECT : BRIG(ELL AVENIE DATA TEL: (305)233-3997 FAX: (30 233-7728 Start Date: 18/15/98
1 MINTY : DADE Page t
AUTDS,HEAVY VEHICLES,I!-TURNS
1 (BRICKELL AVENIE ISE 2451
IFroi North
(From East
IBRID LL AVIXE
IFrov South
ISE 2451
IFror West
Start I
I
Tire I Right
Thru
Left
PEDSI Right
Thru
Left
I
PEDSI
Right
Thru
Left-
I
PEDSI Right Thru
Left
IIntvl.
PEDSI
Total
10/13/98
1
1
16:081
16:151
8
8
243
240
4
18
01
81
12
4
0
16
11
13
164
16
1
81
1
0
0
1
81
469
16:301
8
289
IS
21
3
0
8
32
30
81
01
16
to
191
200
19
7
11
81
0
1
0
81
512
16:451
8
305
7
81
7
0
21
51
19
194
16
11
8
8
8
0
0
8
81
01
564
575
Hourl
I
0
1877
36
21
1
26
8
99
61
66
749
58
11
8
0
0
01
2128
17:0$1
17:151
6
8
366
461
25
31
5.
8
33
1
141
13
186
14
I
51
a
8
8
1
01
664
17:301
8
417
26
18
71
81
a
6
0
8
22
61
26
196
12
11
0
0
0
81
765
17:451
0
447
26
91
6
0
17
14
171
151
15
23
231
261
17
15
81
0
0
0
01
730
Hourl
1
0
1691
87
191
1
25
8
86
3-21
77
874
58,
01
61
8
0
0
0
0
8
01
01
816
2975
Totals
% Apr. I
0
-
2768
95.0
123
211
51
0
185
1
581
143
1623
_1
116
71
8
0
8
1
01
5095
4.2
8.71
17.3
-
62.9
19.71
7.5
83.9
6.1
IL31
-
-
% Int- I
1
I
-
54.3
2.4
0.41
1
1.0
-
3.6
1.11
I
2.8
31.8
2.2
0.11
i
-
-
-
-
-1
- 1
l
-
0'
r
z
, ..
{
_
ir—.—
.1.i.'.�`7:,1.Ll'1�y.
.`�
:t,.Y.r
--,• W-
y_
_��
EANNlDT.
ry. ew'
a ...r
Iem6Q � I6IyL,.•..Lw
.._.'•.r�
�'
�d6_iw' x
C �r'
, t-w�4l�f`/Cf
s wle
i3MEMM y�Y 13H Arr-Ui w
NIrMIr FLORIDA
:
..�
Study Naves MIC2451
CDIiM
9RICKEiL AVEt DATA
33106
TEL: (3851233-3997 FAXs (385)233-7728
Site Codes 8000088A
s pppE
�::::-�`'
t- r wa, '•
Start Date. 18/15/98
r
(BRICKELL AVEME
,HEAVY VEtiI
AUTOS �1)-
Page s 2
IFror North
ISE v Ea
IFror Eaft
IBRICMJ AVENIE
ISE 2451
Start
I
!
IFror South
IFror West
Tire ! Ri ht Thru Left PEDSI Ri ht
Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for
Thru Left PEDSI Right Thru
the Period: 16:00 on 19/15/98
Left ' PEDSI Ri ht Thru
Left PEDSIITataI
Tire
117:00
1 17:08
to 17:45
an 18/IS/98
I
Vol.
Pct.
1 8 1691 87
I & 8
191 25
1 17:00
8 86 521 77 874
1 17:00
58 61
1
Total
94.1 4.8
1 1797
d.01 15. 3
I 163
0.0 52.7 31.91 7.S 86.1
8 0
5.7 0.51 0.8 0.0
0 01
0.0 0.01
High
J Vol.
1 17:15
1170
1 1815
117:45
1 0
I
Total
1 461 c^6
I 494
71 5
I
0 33 141 23 261
15 ®� 17:4e
I
PHF
I L 909
�
I S. 784 '
I
! L 849
1 LOU
ia
"'AUTOS
'*'HEAVY VEHICLES 1
*U—TURNS
19
i G J
58
58
N
0 a
* 0 Inbound
utboland
0 Total
� 0
0
0 0
* 0
BRICKELL AVENUE
0 1689 72 25
1 874
0 0 14 899
0 1691 --g7—
Inbound 1 97
Outbound -egg
Total 2696
^ 0
25
^' 0
^ 0
0
0
58
Inbound
a
163
58
Outbound
164 ^' 86
Total
327 '` 0
86
* 0
77
87
164
Inbound 1015
Outbound 1777
SE
2451
Total 2792
1691 ^' 30 ^' 867
^' 77 6
86 �� 0 ^ 7
—1777
.� 0 0
/I\
* 28 r
=_--- =---0
--= =®
/ I
58— 874
BRICKELL A ENUE
77— 6
North
I
EMINEEM bm DC kZZ
CLIENT Paul Im
JOB Nm 90-142,
-:7.
13M SW 13M AVDM�'SUITE W
Study Naves BRIC2451
PROJECT BRIDQU AVME DATA
0 Mim mm
MAKI, RAIDA 33196
TEL: (3M)P-13-3997 FAX.. (30233-70
Site Code
Start Dates 10/15/98
wiUklS
Page
IBRID(ELL AYM
lFrot North
ISE 2451
IFrov Ea'
s
IRRIMELL Avea
t
ISE 2451
Start I
I
lFron South
Wros Nest
Tf e I Ri ht Thw.
1 /15/98
I I
Left -PEDSI Right- Thru Le POSI Right
Thru
Untyl.
Left PEDSI Total
16:151
0!13
16:381 a 3
8 is
01 12
16:451
8 3 W
0
0
0
8 W 6
Hour)
6 81
91 0 0
0
0
81 8
—39
1
38 of
0
8
8 of
17:001 a 0 4
17:151 0 0 6
81
W
0
1 1
@1 7 81
0
0
0
1
W 11
17:301 8
a @1 6
of 12
17:451 8 0 3
01
0
M 81
8 8
Hour 1 0 8 14
a I
a
9 0 of 8 a 28
I
Total I a 0 23
I
91
8
of
1 1
0
8
0-1 42
% Apr. 1 100.0
01 a a 58 01
81
% Int. 1 28.3
-1 100.0
71.6
6J.
77
Mom DGINEERDS DATA, INC
CLIENT s PBSU,
INC.
132M SW I37rH AVENUE, SUITE 37
Study Nall 8*11161A
JOB NO. W142
MIAMI, FLORIDA 33106
Site Code : I9AIS499
PROM s BRIDUL PRE DATA
0CMINTY
TEL., (305)233-3997 FAX: (315)233-7729
Start Dates 11/15/98
s DAM
Page
I I
AUTOS, HEAVY VEHICLES
IBRIDCELL AVENUE
ISE 26TH.RORD
IBRID(ELL AVENUE
ISE 26TH ROAD
lFroo North
lFrom East
lFron South
lFrot West
Start I
I
Tive I Right
Thru
Left
PEDSI Right
Thru
I
Left PEDSI Right Thru
Left
I
PEDSI Ri ht
Thrl,
Left
wr-Total
16:001 9
180
32
01
It
116
8 01 122 122
17
81 1
m
36
of we
16.0151 5
208
27
81
24
134
0 11 198 178
9
81 5
170
53
81 905
16:301 3
16:451 7
234
278
26
43
01
33
114
1 21 76 142
6
21 5
163
37
11 937
Hourl 24
900
128
01
01
31
99
108
472
a 41 % 185
a 71 394 627
9
17
21 5
194
61
01 1014
1
1
41 16
681
187
81 3556
17:001 7
327
57
01
30--
136
6 21 63 152
17
41 4
201
40
81 1046
17:151 10
371
42
01
24
95
0 111 72 159
0
21 3
263
78
01 1062
17:301 2
17:451 5
336
346
48
74
01
81
41
19
94
0 51 61 172
23
41 5
229
71
01 1091
Hourl 24
1
1389
221
01
1
114
102
427
- 8 61 45 198
6 241 241 681
8
49
21 6
121 18
221
854
77
258
01 1181
81 4300
Tota 11 48
% Apr. 1 1.7
228e
85.1
349
81
213
899
1
6 311 635 1308
57
1
161 34
f5m
445
1
Of 706
% Int. 1 0.6
29.0
13.0
4.4
-1
-1
18.5
78.2
8.5 2.61 31.4 64.8
2.8
6.71 1.6
76.2
22.0
-1' - -
1
&
11.4
-7 0.31 8.0 16.6
0.7
8.21 IL 4
19.5
5.6
-1 -
Pwil INC.
IM ND.: %-142
PROJECT : BRICI(ELL AVM DATA
Calm: DADE
IBRID II AVENUE
(Fror North
Start I
ILI+�...wW[' N6 DATp, ills..
13255 S11 137TH AVENUE, SMITE
MIAMtt "IDA 33186
TEL: (385)LV-3997 FAx: (3851?33-17PI"-:'
AU 0S,HEAVY VEHICLES
s ••
Stud r Nar!=BAIC26RD
Site Code i•/9815499
Start Date: 1@/15/98
Page : 2
ISE 96TH MAD ISRICKELL AVENUE ISE 26TH ROAD
IFron East IFro! South IFroo West
I I I
_.
ht
Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period:
Thru
Left
Tice
1 17:00
1 17:88
16m88'an'18/15/98
to
17:45
on
18/15/g8
Vol.
1 24 1388 221
61 114 427 6
1 17:80
241 241
681
- 48
17:M
Pct.
Total
1 1.4 84.9 13.6
1 1625
8.01 19.9 74.7 1.8
4.21 24.7
69.9
4.1
121 IS
1.21 1.5
854
75.5
M8
22.8
High
1 17:45
1 571
1 17:08
I 974
1 1138
Val.
Total
1 5 346
I 425 74
8' 174 136 6
1 17:30
21 61
172
23
1 17:39
41 5
229
71
PF1F
I L 956
1 L 828
1 260
1 385
1 0.937
1 8.926
"'AUTOS
"'HEAVY VEHICLES
^
24
491 427
40
ry 258
258 0
BRICKELL AVENUE 1
24 1377 218 114
0 ^ 3 ^ 3 681
----- _= 258
24
1053
Inbound 1i25
Outbound 1053
Total 2678
Inbound 1130
utbound 491
847 Total 1621
854 7
IIntvl.
1
81
LOI
I
61
I
I
425
^
2 427
Inbound 571
Outbound 1316 6
Total 1887 ^ 0 6
Inbound 974
Outbound 1404
Total 2378
18 40 677 241
1380 0 4 0
6 =_—__ ___—_ =====
40 681 241
1404 � + �
BRICKELL A ENUE I i
241
854 1316
22
cal
5E 26TH ROAD
MSRI m ENSINEERINS DATA, IM
CLIFJrT ; PBStJ, INC. 13255 SW 137TH AVOIA MITE 297
JOB AL ; 98142 MIAMI, FLORIDA 33186 Study Nam SMAV25RD
pow : BRIDRI AVENUE DATA TEL: (385)233-3997 FAX: (305)233-77a Site Code s g9815488
COUiIY ; DADE Start Date: 16/15/98
I AUTOS, HEAVY VEHICLESIU-TURNS page
IS MIAMI AVEN E ISE y ROAD
IFroa North
East
IS MIAMI AVENUE
ISE 25TH ROAD
Start
I
iFroe
IFroa South
IFroa Nest
T
18/1ilt I Right
18/15/98
Thru
Left
PEDSI Right
1
Thru
Left
REDS Right
Thru
- Left
PFDSI Right
Thru
Left
XMIITotal
16:001
16:151
12
4
77
60
0
2
11
11
4
6
52
6
01
I
3
38
46
11
3
i
1
16:381
12
74
2
21
5
52
59
2
1
21
4
43
31
01
6
3
1@
@i
226
16:451
10
58
3
li
2
40
21
5
33
32
81
1
3
10
21
243
Hour1
i
38
269
7
51
17
203
4
41
14
I51
127
11
13
1
I
11
38
21
904
17:001
11:151
27
22
128
91
4
2
81
31
4
� 55
1
01
8
37
32
1
81
1
6
11
I
1I
316
T 17:381
20
90
2
81
2
5
522
44
2
1
81
3
42
28
81
8
11
10
11
277
+ 17:451
14
94
2
@1
3
39
0
01
01
2
5
39
28
@1
1
10
1@
01
252
Hour1
83
483
10
31
14
190
5
01
18
35
153
31
119
@1
81
1
6
13
01
243
i
1
11
33
44
21
1088
Total)
' % Apr. 1
121
14.7
672
82.1
17
2,0
81
0. 91
31
7.9
393
9
i
41
32
384
246
I
11
24
44
I
1992
>< Int. I
6.0
33.7
@, 8
0, 41
1. 3
89.9
19. 7
2.0
8, 91
5. 4
52.1
42.1
0.1 I
15. 5
2g, g
51
I
i
9.4
0.21
1.6
15.2
12.3
-1
1.2
2.2
4,1
0.21
I
09
U
IENT
s PBSiJ, INC.
8 ND.
: 98-142
F'WZT
: BRIDi(ELL AVENIE DATA
CQIPITY
s DADE
i
IS MIAMI AVENIE
;r
IFror North
Start
I
EN6ItEERI�IE � � �,,;,,M.� a �"^•�.�:����
13255 Sw 137TH AVEI#E, SUITE 291
NIAMh FLORIDA 33186
TEL: (305)233-
399T FAX. (305)233-7720
AIIfQ iavr vEHI4.E3,U-Til�S
ISE 25TH•R0AD
�,Study')ivs�i •S11AV2511d
Site. Code, t:19815488
Start Oates 11/15/98
Page - . • _ •, 2 _ .
!S MIAMI AVENUE ISE EM Me
IFror East I IFror South [From West
I
e: �u I
Lery
Ftm
I Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection"for'the Periods 16:001oni18/15/98rto
Thu t45
Thru
Lefi
Tire
1 17:08
1 17:00
17fit
anP1EBS1!W
VOL
1 83 493
10 31 14 199
1 17:00
5
1 17:00
Pct.Total
Total
1 1499 80.7
I 499
2. 0 9.61 98. 9
2. 3 8- 01 6. 2
521
4110
IL O I 12. 2
3& 6
High
117:00
I 209
209
117:00
I 290
1 96
48 8
Vol.
1 27 128
4
01
1 17:00
2
117:15
Total
1 159
61�
01 8
37
32
0! 8
11
.18
' PHF
1 0.785
10.857
1 77
1 0.942
I 30
1 0.758
I
1
"
'AUTOS
^HEAVY VEHICLES
i *U—TURNS ..
3
83
392
190
119
44
44
0
0 Inbound
outbound
33 Total
33
0
*
0
11
1 1
0
0
S MIAMI AVENUE
831 - 403 91 4
^ 4
0 0 11
0 0 x 1 44
83— 403 10 — 211
Inbound 99
Outbound 211
Total 710
0 14
0
189
1 190
90 Inbound 209 0
392 Outbound 61 5
482 Total 270 0 5
0
18
33 61
Inbound 290 10
Outbound 419 SE 25TH ROAD
Total 709
11 116 152 18 0
403 2 - i •• 0 ®
5 .1 0
419 119 =__-- ----- -- _ 1
Ii 153 18 0 No:^th
S MIAMI AVENUE I
I
I
21
2.21
1
11
I
I
Ilntvl•
V 3 — v+ _
DIT 11C
l
c3m0mmSWms3
rCN
f
.
1. Dl
iUm
7DTeH
11m W
Study
MIDUL AVENUE DATA
N I P.
TEL: (385)2n *7
....Site Code i MSM
CUM I mm
3 0 M—*
r2l,
Start Datel 10?15/98
U-TURNS
Page I I
IS MANI AVENUE
ISE 25m,RoAD RIA
is NI AVME
ISE MH ROADIFrom
IFrom North
Start I
East IFrom South
I
IIm West
Tire I Richt Thru Left
PEDSI Ri ht
I
Th"n Left —Left
I
PEDSI Ri ht Thptl
Left
PEDSlITotal
[BREAK] I
eI 2
16:381 8 8 @
el
8
@
1
Hourl 1 0 0
81
8
8 @
1
8 4
81
T
17:001 0 a 1
fAREM 1
81
@1
8 0 0 1
@1
8 0
0 @1 2
Hourl 8 8 1
I
ei
f
0
@ @ 0 I 1 @ 1
2
81
@
Total) a 0 1
% Ap- 100.8
81
0
-
0 @ @I 0
% Int. I - - 16.6
109.8
83.3
m
-
CRMMDS ENGINEERING DATA, VC
CLIENT : PBStJ, INC.
JOB NO. : 98-142
13255 SW 137'TH AV MITE 2147
�+
.
Study Name: SMAV26RD
PROJECT : BRIDE L Avea DATA
NIAMI, FLORIDA 33186
TEL: (305)233-3997 FAX:
Site Code : 09815421
CtL1IY : DAM
(385)233-7720
Start Date: 1s/15/98
`
i IS MIAMI AVENUE
AUTMJ EAVY VEHICIES,U-TURNS
Page : 1
IFrom North
ISE 26TH•mv IS NIAMI AVIME
(From East
ISE 26TH RDAD
Start I
I
IFrom South
(From West
Tire I Ri ht Thru
18/13/98
Left
f�EDSI Ri ht
Thru Left PEDSI I Ri ht Thru
Left
PEDSI Ri ht
Thru
Left PEDSII Total
• 16:001 1 82
16:151 3 48
3
18
21
01
g
17
1
32 49 11 5 64
144
01
1
164
136
3 01 694
1 16:301 1 65
14
01
6
23 62 01 2 54
22 57
111
81
168
129
5 81 624
16:451 1 71
12
01
9
81 8 51
34 55 of 9
106
01
181
136
6 11 654
'! Hcurl 6 266
I
39
21
40
4Z
ill 223 11 24 211
102
463
11
11
183
688
142
543
5 11 667
1
19 21 2639
17:001 2 68
17:151 0 104
9
16
01
01
19,
14
I
37 52 01 7 36
99
it
1 88
136
36
8 21 664
664
• 17:301 0 72
14
01
5
13 63 01 3 47
13 36 11
97
11
88
168
6 01 740
f 17:451 1 91
15
01
9
6 49
®1
105
21
232
149
3 8f 687
Hourl 3 335
1 I
54
01
47
69 218 18 180
399
91
840
6 1
I
18 81 2831
Total 9 601
% Apr. 1 1.2 85.2 13.1
93
21
0.21
87
12.2
I
180 441 21 42 391
M.3 62.1
853
1
101
1528
1184
37 101 5478
t % Int. 1 0.1 18.9
1.7
-1
1.5
0.21 3.2 30.1
3.2 8.0
65.8
0.71
55.3
42.9
1.3 8.31
I
-1 0.7 1.1
15.5
0.11
27.9
21.6
0.6 0.11
I -
I
ME
1
i
s
i •
• •9' • IENT : PBSIJt INC.
>� JOB NIL W142
PROJECT t BRIO(M AVENIE DATA
;-O" : DADE
IS NIANI AVIXE
IFroo North
Start I
S_3'l C
COMM ENSINEERIN6 DATAt,INC r•,
f .. h
3255 SW 1377H SMITE W ' . ' ' • ` :}
NIW9It RMDA 33186 t2T?,,.`- Study Naeei 944Ve�bAQ
S.
TEL: r385I233-3997 FAX: t385I63-7728
AUTOS, HEAVY VEHICLES, (}-TUI
IS'E 26TH•ROAD IS NIANI AVENIE
IFroi East IFrom South
I I
:te We 1198154Z1
Start Datu t8/ts/go
r
' • Page
=ISE 26TH ROAD
1From Nest
I IlntvI.
Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection �forthe Period:
16:08'ontgnt 18/15/rs
�Ri
tile
1 17:06
1 17:08
98to
1Lft
1745 on 8/15/
Vol.
Pct.
I 3 335 54INI
1 0.7 85.4 13.7
61 47 69 218
11 17: 8
180
390
17t
91 80
Total
1 392
8.81 14.8 20.5 65.8
1 335
8.21 3.8 38.1
65.3
1.51 55.7
High
1 17:15
1 17:08
1 597
1 1587
Vol.
Total
1 8 104 16
1 120
81 19 37 52
1 17:30
81 6 49
105
1 17:43
21 212
PHF
18.817
1 1&
10.175
1 162
I 487
1 0.921
1 L 926
''AUTOS
^HEAVY VEHICLES
*U—TURNS ^
*
3
462
rp9
390
A.
18
18
0
*
0 Inbound
^utbound
^'
638 Total
641
3
*
0
^'
-------_
838
840
^
c
2
*
0
S MIAMI AVENUE
3 335 53 47
0 ^ 0 ^ ® 180
0 * 0 * 1 18
3 335 --54— = 245
Inbound .�92
Outbound 245
Total 637
I
i
641 18 81
42.5 1.1 L 51
I
188 1 61
^ 0
47
0
"' 69
^ 0
69
1507
* 0
462
Inbound
J35
1969
Outbound
713 216
Total
1048 2
218
'
* 0
18
641
713
Inbound 597
54
Outbound 1393
SE 26TH
ROAD
Total 1990
840 ^' 388 - 180
- 18
9
335 '� 2 ^ 0
218
^ 0
0 �I\
* .0 * 0
* 0
0 I
1393 �90— 180
S MIAMI AV NUE
—18 —__—
9
I
North
I
Ij j- "(41
DISINEERV�.pRTA,. rnw�
m1w 1 PBSIJO W_
132M SO 13M AVDIUIZ, -SUITE �17'
vm
9tud '"s:
XX NIL I W142
MIAMI, FLORIDA M186 Site Code i 89B15el
BRICK L AVIXIE DATA TEL: (385)233-3997 FAW015)2334728
DADE Start Datel ti/15/98
Page j I
U,_TUR%
IS MIAMI AVENUE I SE MTN An IS MIAMI AVENUE ISE MTH ROAD
IFrom North IFroe East IFrom South IFrom West
Start I
Tice I Right Thru Left
_PEDS1 Right Thru Left _M,IRiqht Thru Left PEDS1 Right Thru Left PEDS1 Total
16:301
[BREAK] I
Hourl 9 a 1 81 8 8 8 8r 89 @1
EBREAI I
17:301 8 0 1 81 0 0 8 of 0 8 0 111 a 8 8 91 1
tBREAKI 1 -1 I 1
Hourl 8 0 1 81 8 8 8 81 0 8 8 of a 0
Totals a' 8 2 81 8 8 8 81 8 8 of 9
% Apr. I - - lee. a -1
% Int. I - - 100.0 -1
2 95 - 0, 1
z.
CROSSROADS ENSINEERI*16' DATA, INC
PBSIJ9
INC.
13255
SW 137TH MFI'SUITE 287
Study Nate: SVAVUIC
JOB N1 98-142
MIAMI, FLORIDA 33186
Site Code : MM1541
PROJECT AVM DATA
TEL: (30233-3M FAX: (315)233-7720
Start Dates iO/15/98
MDADE
Page
AUTOS, HEAVY VEHICLES
IS MIAMI
AVENUE
IBRID(ELL AVENUE IS MIAMI AVENUE
IBRICI(Ell. AVENUE
lFros North
IFroi East
lFrom South
lFroa West
Start I
I
I
I
ljntvl.
Tive I Right
Thru
Left
PEDSI Right
Thru
Left PEDSI Right Thru
Left
PEDSI
Right
Thru
Left
PEDSI Total
19/15/98
1
1
1
1
16:001 21
249
a
01
1
148
44 01 55 236
1
01
1
204
25
61 984
16:151 7
213
a
V
0
132
69 91 78 152
0
01
8
190
28
of 861
16:301 5
228
0
01
2
150
71 01 68 177
8
01
4
155
17
01 869
I6i451 3
297
0
81
2
135
111 V 48 129
9
V
1
164
19
Of 9e8
Hourl 36
I
987
9
01
5
565
294 81 233 694
0
01
6
713
89
01 3622
17:001 8
337
0
I
V
2,
169
I
133 01 38 155
9
1
81
6
192
'll
1
01 1045
17:151 9
345
0
V
1
184
172 01 40 163
a
81
1
M
29
Of 1144
17:301 15
295
0
01
12
156
146 01 44 151
0
01
3
193
14
V 1029
17:451 19
200
a
of
0
184
133 81 22 105
a
of
1
170
13
91 847
Hour[ 51
1
1177
a
01
13
693
584 81 144 574
a
01
5
755
67
01 4065
Totall 87
2164
0
1
01
20
1258
1
878 Of 377 1268
0
1
81
11
1468
156
1
01 7687
% Apr. 1 3.8
96.1
—
—1
0.9
58.3
40.7 —1 22.9 77.0
—
—1
8.6
89.7
9.5
—1 —
% Int. 1 1.1
28.1
—
—1
0.2
1&3
11.4 —1 4.9 16.4
—
—1
0.1
19.0
2.9
—1 —
o'RVSI
TAK D&t1j JUISM
VINE DATA ORIM. lie
MIMI A DA, 'AC! , .4
MINTY I WE (U5 4 File LL
Hare SM" MIAMI AVRE Cross t t B/V SE ISTH ROAD AM SE 201 RM DI-DIFEC"On
gin Thursday
R.M.me "ak P. M. A.M. 48 �1
I �-A-x 1210 ns35 I it B3
12:15 9 78 1 a 38 1 17 116
12:38 13 59 1 3 42 1 16 lot
12:45 5 35 49 234 1 1 21 40 155 1 6 56 89 389
11:00 3 51 1 9 43 1 3 94
81.615 1 65 1 0 43 1 1 108
11:38 1 56 1 1 46 1 2 102
81:45 3 8 59 231 1 8 1 43 173 1 3 9 102 486
02:00 9 49 1 0 39 1 0 as
82:15 1 51 1 1 48 1 2 99
82:39 a 57 1 0 41 1 a 98
82:45 1 2 51 208 1 1 2 41 169 1 2 4 92 377
63:00 2 56 1 6, 45 1 2 lot
63:15 3 43 1 1 28 1 4 71
83:38 1 56 1 1 38 1 2 94
63:45 2 8 58 213 1 9 2 39 158 1 2 18 97 363
84:00 0' 53 1 0 69 1 a 122
84:15 a 58 1 a 40 1 0 98
64:38 3 47 1 a 60 1 3 187
64:45 1 4 68 218 1 1 1 53 222 1 2 5 113 449
05:00 2 55 1 0 184 1 2 159
05:15 4 55 1 5 90 1 9 145
85:38 3 64 1 4 75 1 7 139
85:45 5 14 54 228 1 4 13 77 346 1 9 27 131 574
99 11 54 1 2 72 1 13 126
.15 a 43 1 4 53 1 12 96
06:38 19 42 1 is 68 1' 34 lie
06:45 19 57 38 177 1 9 30 52 245 1 28 87 90 422
87:00 34 33 1 13 45 1 47 78
97:15 41 39 1 18 45 1 59 84
87:36 54 40 1 30 38 1 84 78
87:45 68 189 36 148 1 23 84 26 154 1 83 273 62 382
98:00 85 30 1 24 29 1 109 59
e8.-15 83 23 1 21 25 1 104 48
.08:38 106 25 1 19 18 I M 43
68:45 119 393 34 112 1 31 95 12 84 1 150 488 46 196
89:00 125 22 1 26 13 1 151 35
89:15 98 25 1 25 20 1 123 45
89:38 77 22 1 29 16 1 106 38
09:45 70 370 24 93 1 26 106 16 65 1 96 476 48 158
10:00 79 31 1 33 12 1 112 43
10:15 43 21 1 20 15 1 63 36
16:38 57 11 1 37 6 1 94 17
18:45 44 223 15 78 1 26 116 18 43 1 70 339 25 121
11:00 61 16 1 35 7 1 % 23
11:15 51 12 1 35 4 1 86 16
11:38 48 16 1 40 4 1 88 20
11:45 44 204 8 52 1 37 147 7 22 1 81 351 15 74
Totals 1507 1992 618 1838 2125 3822
Day Totals 3499 2448 5%7
teak
LL7k9% s2.1% 29.0% 47.8%
Hour 68:38 12:15 11:06 05:00 08-38 05:00
Volume 448 237 147 346 549 574
P. H. F. .89 .75 .91 .93 .90 .98
rl ft w 61 1 V LiurK
IUI JWb J77b&W7
PACE 2
SEE PACE 2
CORAL..
�QABLFS
84
SOUTH 34
DO? 70
I JAMI
ino
14
-I-A N
x
KEY
BISPAYNE
D
0 W N T 0 W N
lNSERT
115102
5012 5001
tx-1 I !, , 1
034------1
101
87053
-
1 00 5047
5101
87053-001-*31 98 1033 0030-001
5011
f5Q-1 �-.
000
8706-61 045 1
550
5097
5096 87120-001
r
SR 00►
5091':
51
5()95 -6-7
5098 -1-20—
Lo
5090
clq
9
F-- 5042
co
co
m 0
r-. 1035
i;
1 86
co
5041
5008
A
SR 072
87054
M
1037
503.9,
87017
I-, •1
Of, ir
00- 061
ut. / �Otl-:Jl9 a tb
rrcurl ruu 1
ub t'L/1{� �' &Numb + ex Lug Job a r ft2 b
MACE 3
n a �r,PAR'."MENT
OF TRANSPORT ��' �;
iv/Ud/yt!
I L 2U, 43
TRC0023
ATION COUNTS
N
AADT HISTORY
PAGE 1
; 875037 ?
C:OUNTYI: ( 1993 j
*COUNTY/STATION:
CATION: SR 5/tl::—
i , —100 Fr i ; , UC SOUTH MTAMI AVE
} COUNT NON-0111
YEAR AADT
DIR
ASC-AADT
DIR
COUNT NON-DIR
DIR
DIR
_
_
nSC.-PLAD'"
-
.,
YI;At\ AADT
ASC-AADT
llSC-AADT
i 1993 23300
' 1995 23800
1 1-500
SF1C0
!., 9800
-- -------
1994 ] 7BOO
--------
1 10500
------
5 7300
1997 18600
_
1 10500
5 i9000
5 8100
1996 21600
1 13000
5 8600
i
'CLEAR —EXIT PE'1—ANIC MENU PF2,-CUIt MENU PF3—TCL MF..,NU PA1-PAGING
jEQUAL/GREATER COU`TYKS SELECTEV
INQUIRY COMPLETE —NO MORE PAGES
i
Ut:7'�1s6�Ht3 1 1 !b tmuM t }uu t ub MLNU + FRGHS + PH 1 L) l 1toG a r i5�dy
VEPAR'1'MENT OF TRAN,POFi'1' r N luiudi98
TRC0023 ATION COUNTS AADI' HT STORY
COUNTY/STATION:
CATION:
! 875C39
( ?993
op
SR 5/i1,:S-1
00
�'�OGNTYR:
FEE'1 N. Or
RICKEN8ACKEit
C:iWY.
OUNT
NON-DIR
DTR
DIR
' YEAR
AADT
A5C-AADT
DSC-AADT
COUNT
ARNUN-DIR
YEAR
c'111DT
1993
1995
28000
24000
1 14000
i i1500
--
5 14COO
',
-
1994
22300
1997
i
f
25000
1 12500
12,'jO0
5 i�r),.�
i996
26500
I.
t
DIR
ASC_AADT
I 9300
1 13500
' CLEAR=EXIT E'Fl— kC MENU PF2-CUR MENU PF3-a1-CL MENU EQUAL/GREATER c.OUN;TYR SELE:CTr,:) PAi-PAG1'NG
INQUIRY COMPI.E;'i'i:'-NlO MCRr PAGFS
i
cal
MMlub q
11,21.25
PAGE 1
DIR
DSC_ AADT
5 13000
5 13000
1 ,�
OCT-08-98 11,28
FROM, FOOT
DS PLNC + PROMS
+ PR ID, 305 3775H67
PACE S
`TR00023
!'LOik DEYARTMEN,- QR
Gi
TIZANaPOitiAri'q t1
lu/u8/98
11.21645
'
TION COUNTS AADT HTSTORY
COUNTY/STAT.ON:
; A'/!c04 i
)
PAGE 1
CATION: SR 5/IJ:;-1
/�
-
Y, :
CUUNi _R.
F'LET
( 1993 )
rVG
S �`.. a3 ST
COUNT NON-UI R
YEAR AADT
AG:.-AADT
D C TAA::'.
COUNT NON-DIR
DIR
DIR
1993 25500
--------
-----.___
YrAH AADT
___- ______--
ASC-AADT
DSC-AADT
1995 16EiUU
1997
j 13COU
9000
;, IlSGU
5 7I00
1999 16200
•►995
---- - __
1 8300
--------
5 7900
2:3000
i
10500
�i 1.2500
2:3000
1 11000
5 12000
CLEAR=EXI'i' F'4'l-'I'itr_ MEN:] PF2-CUR t•1ENu P 3r � EQUAL/GREATER CO-jN i YIt,L SLLEC' ED TCL I.i NU PA1=PAGING
INQU.TRY Cc)MPi,F'1'ir-tl() MGkc; PAGES
c(1
vcy' Do
Fl.
f
Signal Phasing and Timing Information
1009- 561
-•••• • -'• Ul. I liq -, vo Wt.0 IV: z7 IV: I bbb U1 V I LL NU: J3= 4'f'f G4 Rc!cb h'bl
z.
X 3ca 3 S3 3
2268 S MIAMI AVZ i 26 RD T:?IING FOR DAY N 4 (®BC:'I0>!1 33) PAOR 4
TIME PT O" ACO (IY A BDL Y •DP G Y
It ACL Y
MZM, iS t 1 6
O
a Y M CYC
i 1 1• 1 4 2 f 3 lE 4 4 1 S 3
a00 11 4 15 1 4 2 6 3 iS 1 4 1 3 3
945 G. 1
6s2ATa N20
12 i 4 2 t 3 16 4 4 i s ]
130 7 62 17 1 4 9 'J 3 1S 30 4 1 5 1
700 •
i 6DLATg Uta
66LATi HIG
i• 1• 1 4 2 22 3 is 7 4 1 10 3
030 f 81 16 1 4 3 13 3 13 13 4 1 IS
70MITR 0/1
#CAN P6AM
3
I 1400 10 •i 1• i a 2 11 3 is 13 a 1 1s
r 1930 7 62 17 1 4 2 6 3 it 10 4 1
ODAVtRJ1I
form ram
s ]
'NTZR Nv)(T PAOR N (1 DIGIT), DAY M (2 DIGIT,99-HRLP)
OR ASGHT N (4 DIGIT) 0/1
1 I I 1 ! rntra 1 oPPLIN I I
111100,47
•
A L' I --VZ L 1 V
•�
I tL NU: JrlJ u, f buGC
+;�'Gb h'qG
CRT")
4101 A MMI AVE Z 29 Rb
TIMING FOR DAY 0
4 (SZCPION 99)
PAGN 4
TZW PT or! Am O
Y R EbD
G Y
it
s Y M
CYC
HISS Is
'
1
i
0 6 1 77 1
200 11 0 19 1
4 1 i6
4 1 16
1 4
1 4
1
1
12
SKATE RIO
j
545 6 1 97 1
4 1 16
1 4
1
6
12
471ATS XZG
66IATZ NIG
630 7 11 42 1
4 1 16
1 4
1
12
70MITE 0/1
700 1 6• 62 1
4 1 16
1 4
1
24
• 90AM P=AX
(
D30 9 81 62 1
4 1 16
1 4
1
T4
90AVZRAOR
1400 l0 64 i2 1
4 1 16
1 4
1
24
DOPM PEAX
1910 7 11 42 1
4 1 16
1 4
1
12
70NITZ 0/%
ENTER NEXT PAGE M
(1 DIGIT),
DAY 0
(2 DIGIT,99-HELP)
OR A982T 0 (4
DIGIT)
m
111:00106
0 J �901
61b1"lY- --WZ Wr.. Aa.tjW 1L� I.70,J L:V
I tL MJ: J= 4 f f bµGG 37e�,b h�J r.... • .
3171 W 1 i Q MIAMI AV9
TIPW PT OFF RNO 0 Y R EL
TIMING MR DAY N 4 (SECTION
Y AM
33) PAGE 4
MINI li
;
10
Y
R RM
6
Y
Q
Y M CYC
0 6
300 11
23 26 1
44 22 1
4
4
2
2
0
0
0 17
0 14
4
4
2 i
2
9
2
CCYATR NIA
345 6
29 26 1
4
2
0
0 17
4
7
2 6
3
3
2
i0L1►T! NIO
930 7
29 20 1
4
2
6
3 19
4
2 6
3
2
SUATE NIO
0
9
so 18
A
70NIT3 0/1
020
31 1
2
f
3 26
4
2 14
3
90A1 PE11IC
1400 10
i 3i 1
4
2
1
2 2S
4
2 20
3
90AVERAOi!
1930 7
29 20 1
4
2
6
J l9
4
2 i
7
90PM PEAR
RNTER NEXT PAGE 9
(1 DIGIT).
DAY M
(2
DIGIT.99■HELP) OR ASSET 0
(4 DIGIT)R 0/1
I.
14011 1 1 1 1 1 mvp I OFFLII3 I I
J10:W24
4 1 0
r y Ul-1 -14— 7b WMAJ 11 . M IV.
1
1 GL 14u; ti t f
228E US 1 & COPAL WAY
1 TIMB PT OPP ACO O Y
R EN
p
TIMZNG POR DAY M
0
4 ) PAGE 4 (C7(CTION 123
3
MINI is
19
1
Y
R Do
Y
1t
Y N C'YC`
0 30
0 2p
i
4.
1{
16
1
4
1 10
4
1
7 979MY NJ
' 100 27
1
O 20
1
4
S
i
li
1
4
1 10
4
1
6 67LATR 300
$00 S
27 29
1
4
1
4
12
1
4
1 0
4
1
6 NI0
700 6
10 53
1
4
1
4
If
1
4
1 10
4
1
70M
0pR= AN
930 7
too SS
1
4
1
4
16
1
4
1 10
4
1
10 CM MAX
1349 17
too 69
1
4
1
4
10
1
4
1 li
4
1
10SMID DAY
1600 12
31 91
1
4
1
4
10
1
4
1 Y
4
1
11SpM PEAS(
1900 9
66 91
1
4
14
10
1
4
1 G
4
1
90P08T-PM
2700 20
-1
0 20
1
4
1
4
16
1
4
1 10
4
1
tom & KE
Mrm NXXT PAGE
J
k
(1 DIGIT),
DAY #
(2 DYGYT, 99■HLrLP)
OR ASSET N
(4 MIT) Y NZ
�
t
r
i0
1 1
t
1
1
1
110168152
IJC. I "14-' yly 4:tL 11:101 11J: I bob ll 1 V I tL MJ: Jeb 4'i'r b4ed iic'�b F t?5
tLL
4321 0' 1 • 83 24e31
TIMM FOR DAY N
4
(BxCTIOX
32) PA02 4
TZME
PT 0". ACM P
Y
R
NO
Y R DK
lr
0
Y
R AL
Y
s Y N CYC
We 7 10
•7
14
1
5
0
6 9 11 10
4
1
7
4 3
6 6
1
4
1
5
3
65LA'Tx NIG
200
11 52 11 10
4
1
7
4 2
5 2
1
4
1
S
3
60LATE NIO
54S
6 1 11 10
4
1
7
4 2
4 6
1
4
1
5
3
66LATZ HIG
630
7 60 15 10
4
1
9
4 2
6 5
1
4
1
5
3
70SITS 0/1
700
9 70 34 10
4
1
13
4 2
5 2
1
4
1
5
3
3 90AM PL►A)C
030
9 63 34 10
4
1
12
4 2
6 3
1
4
l
5
3
90AVZRAQB
1400
10 31 35 10
4
1
9
4 2
9 4
1
4
1
6
3
90PM PIAK
1230
7 it 15 10
4
1
9
4 2
6 5
1
4
1
5
3
70SITZ 0/1
Et= NEXT PAGN 6
(i DIGIT)►
DAY 0
(2 DIDIT,99•HRLP)
OR ASSET 6 (4 DIGIT)
14011'
I I I I I r=p I OFFLIN I I
I10:57:44
Ul I �14 5CI uic�/ 11: bl 1 U: I bOrj 1J 1 V 1 t=L NU: Jt= a r r eK+et
� �Oe.'CA P"rJ0
2267 Ua 1 a as 26 RD
TIMING ?Olt DAY M 4
(SICT100t 33)
wwx 4
TIMI
PT Ors AM 0
Y
It
3L
Y Imp
Y
R CM
Y
a Y N CYC
MINI 1s
•3
to
5
0
300
4 9 24
11 25 20
1
1
4
4
2
2
0
0
0 20
0 19
4
4
1 6
1 6
3
3
2
631AT3 Nro
549
6 3 24
1
4
2
0
0 20
4
1 4
3
2
2
601.ATR via
4DLAT3 MIO
$30
700
7 66 21
0 94 35
1
1
4
4
2
2
5
0
3 SP
4
1 6
3
70MIT3 0/1
930
9 97 34
1
4
2
7
0 33
3 20
4
4
i 6
1 7
3
3
2
90AN PUK
1409
10 79 17
1
4
2
4
3 35
4
1 14
3
90AVMWR
9opm pRAX
1930 7 63 21
Er= N&XT PAO3
1
9
4 2 4
U Dt9=T),
3 i9
DAY #
4
!2
1 6 3
DIOITrgg-HBLP)
OR ABa=T A
701UTZ 0/1
(4 DIGIT)
14011 1 1 1 1 1tpvFIOrrriNl I
110:5602
0
ul- 414- = Ujr-v A1.t7L ILi 1JWO 1JIV
i t.L nu; J= 4 r r bvee arm ►ter - - -
2261 G/ 1 i ON 1$ AD
TIME 9T Ott AM F Y
TIMING FOR DAY 0 4 (atCTION 223)
3�ALIE 4
xmr 10 is
1
SDM
p
i6
G
1,
Y
It8
Y M CYC
0 20 62 23 12
4
1
4
16
1
4
1
30 22 92 10 19
4
1
4
16
1
4
1
? 66EJWLY IQ3
100 23 62 16 13
4
1
4
10
1
4
1
7 63LATE 1QIO
93LATG
500 5 60 25 12
4
1
4
16
1
4
i
7 MAT N
NIG
700 6 0 31 12
4
1
4
10
S
4
1
930 7 96 90 12
4
1
4
16
1
4
1
SOOAM DAM
MAN
1046 13 0 70 12
4
1
4
it
1
4
1
GAY
1100 12 45 45 12
4
1
4
16
1
4
1
103M1 pDAY
1900 9 36 42 12
4
1
4
i6
4
4
1
90pOBPM
2300 30 62 23 12
4
1
4
16
l
4
1
90SVE
90POS i Ma
Man NEXT PAGZ N
(1 DIGIT),
DAY 0
(2
DIGIT,99-HELP) OR ASSET 0
7 Y NS
(4 DIGIT)
atoll
le
I I I 1 I nup l OFFLIN I I
11015403
i
I
i
I
Accident Data
.1
,�.f 3 -tip..-
IN
FOR
SAFG F i Li I N1 411S
AARPJ13 PI
f� -
FOTRT—OF—IMPACTy_"_
Ct �SR`faUii l:fs�__----._—._____._.�----_—_—__
�'K1U�ElE:Ft—pICCEti-----�____..____.._..___._.____
TFitiAti-6EFECTS---_—____--.
M=
CRASH 10 NUMBER
1 1 FRONT END
1 0 NOT APPLICABLE 1 N/DEFEC'T1
NUMBER OF PEOPLE KILLED IN CRASH
COUNTY
1 2 RIGHT FRONT CORNER
1 2 OBSTRUC/W./WO WARNING 1HU11BER INJLIRED
}j
COUNTY OF CRASH
1 3 RIGHT FRONT OIR PANEL
1 3 ROAD REPAIR/GONSTRUCT'ION I
NUMBER OF PEOPLE 114JURED IN CRASH
—_
SECTION
1 4 RIGHT FRONT DOOR
! 4 LOOSE SURFACE MATERIAL_ !VEHICLE TYPE
�
SECTION OF CRASH
1 5 RIGHT REAR DOOR
1 5 SHOULDERS SOFT/LOW/1110H 1
0 HIT AND RUN/PHANTOM
--
SUBSECTION
1 6 RIGHT REAR OTR PANEL
1 6 HOLES/RUTS/UNSAFE EDGE 1
1 AUTOMOBILE
SUBSECTION OF CRASH
1 7 RIGHT REAR CORNER
1 7 STANDING WATER 8 WORN RD.1
2 PASSENGER VAN
_
MILEPOST
1 8 REAR E14D
1 77 ALL OTHERS 88 UNKNOWN ;
3 PIURUP/LIGHT TRUCK (2 REAR WHEELS)
NEAREST MILEPOST TO CRASH
I i LEFT REAR CORI4ER
'TRAFFIC CONTROL 1
4 tIFDIUM TRUCK t4 REAR TIRES)
NODE
1 10 LEFT REAP: OTR PANEL
1 1 ND CONTROL 2 SPO ZONE 15
fif-AVY TRUCK (2 OR MORE NEAP: A, LES)
NEAREST NODE FROM CRASH
1 11 LEFT REAR DOOR
1 3 TRAFFIC S1014AL 4 STOI-' SGNI
6 TRUCK TRACTOR(CAB)
STATE ROAD
1 12 LEFT FRONT DOUR
! 5 'FIELD SIC14 6 FLASHING L.T.1
7 MOTOR HOME(RV)
STATE ROAD NUMBER
! 13 LEFT FRO14T OTR PANEL
1 7 R/R SIGNAL G OFFICER 1
8 BtJS
;
ADT
1 14 LEFT FRONT CORNER
1 9 POSTED N/U-TUR14 1
9 BICYCLE 10 MOTORCYCLE
r'
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
! 15 HOOD
1 77 ALL OTHERS 88 UNKNOWN 1
11 HOPED
YEAR
1 16 ROOF
!SITE LOCATION 1
12 ALL TERRAIN VEHICLE
'TRAIN
_
°'—
YEAR OF CRASH
MONTH
1 17 TRUNK
1 18 U14DERCARRIAGE
1 1 N/INTERSECTION/RRX/HRIDGE 1
1 2 AT I14TERSEC:TIO14 1
13
14 OTHER
MONTH OF CRASH
1 19 OVERTURN
1 3 INFLUENCED BY INTERSECT I ON I
HARM(A31- EVENT
DAY
1 20 WINDSHIELD
1 4 DRIVEWAY ACCESS 5 FUR CR.
1 CULL REAR END 2 COLL HEAD rum
DAY OF CRASH
; 21 FIRE
1 6 PRIGDE 7 ENTRANCE RAHP 1
3 COLL ANGLE 4 COLL LEFT TORII
HOUR
1 22 NOT CODED
1 9 EXIT RAMP 9 PARKING 1-01 1
5 (111.1. F,'IGHT TUF:N 6 COLL SIVEIVIPE
HOUR OF CRASH
! 88 UNKNOWN
1 10 PARKING LOT AISLE /STALL l
7 CULL PACKED INTO 8 COLL PARKED CAR
LANES
lCON1RIBUTING CAUSE
1 11 PRIVATE PROPERTY 1
9 COLL W/MV OTHER ROAD
�
�R
1 -9 MORE THAN 9 LANES)
1 1 NO IMPROPER DRIVING
1 77 ALL OTHERS 1
10 COLL W/PEDESTRIAN
R11 OR UR
1 2 CARELESS DRIVING
!ROAD SIDE 1
it COLT_ W/BIKE
1 OUTSIDE CITY,OUTSIUE URBAN! 3 FAILED TO YIELD RHT OF WAY! I INTERSECTION L LEFT 1
12 COLL W/B19E (BIKE LANE)
2 INSIDE CITY,OUTSIDE URBAN
1 4 IMPROPER PARKII•IG
1 M MEDIAN R RIGHT 1
13 COLL W/MOPED 14 COLL U/TRAI14
3 OUTSIDE CITY,INSIDE URBAN
1 5 IMPROPER LANE CHANGE
I S SIDE RD. TO FIGHT 1
15 COLL W/ANIMAL
4 INSIDE CITY, INSIDE URBAN
1 6 IMPROPER. TURN
1 T SIDE RD. TO LEFT 1) 1114MNOUN.'
16 HV 1L/SIGN/SIGN POST
9 UNKNOWN
! ?ALCOHOL-UI4dER INFLUENCE
1TFtAFFIC CHARAC:1'F>FtISTIGS I
17 11IV H/UTILITY POLE /1.I13,Hl 1'Ol_E
f —
T'YF1= ROAD
11a DRUGS -CINDER. INFLUENCE
1 0 Ut4KNDWN 1 STRA1tifFT LEVEL-1
1I? 1'i'J H/GIJARORAIL 19 HV HiFf_WC'L
x, _
0 1401 DIVIDED
; 9 ALCOIIOL-DRUG?-UNDER INFLUE! 2 STRAIGHT UPGRADE/DOWNRRADE
20 HV H/CONCRETE BARRIER WALL
1 14UT DIVIDED, SUBSTANDARD
1 in FOLLOWED 'TO CLOSELY
1 3 CURVE LEVEL !
_
2 DIVIDED
; 1.1 DISREGARDED TRAFFIC SIG
1 4 CURVE UPGRADE/DOWNGRALIE 1
21 IIV tli'BF<IGDE/PIER/AI+UTMEt4T
— —
3 DIVIDED.SUPSTANDARD
112 EXCEEDED SAFE SPEED
IVEHICLE MOVEMENT 1
22 HV H/TREE/SHR,UB
4 014E WAY 5 RAM1''S
1 13 DISREGARDED STOP SIGN
1 1 STRAIGHT AHEAD 1
2:3 C'CIF_t_ W/CONSTRUC11014 BARRICADE/SI61-1
6 NOT DIVIDED, L-TURN
14 FAI1_ED TO MAINTAIN EQUIP.
1 2 SLOWING/STOPPII4G/STALLEI) 1
24 COl_I. W/TRAFFIC GATE
8 DIVIDED, L-TURFI
1 15 IhIF'E'.OF'ER PASSING
+ 3 MAKING LEFT 7UP.14 I
25� C0l.1. W/CRASH AITEt•IUATORS
9 NOT OPE14 TO TRAFFIC
1 16 DROVE LEFT OF CENTER
1 4 BACK1140 126
COOL W/FIXED OBJECT ABOVE ROAD
fa
EXCEEDED STATED SAFE SPD.
+ S MA14114G RIGHT TURN
21 I -IV 11, OTHER FIXED OBJECT
1 DAYLIGHT 2 DUSK 3 DAWN
; 18 OBSTRUCTING TRAFFIC
1 6 CHANGING LANES !
2l3 LOLL W/MOVEABLE OBJECT 014 RII.
4 DARK(STREEI LIGHT)
! 19 IMPROPER LOAD
1 7 ENTERING/LEAVING PARklhlli 1
27 NV RAN INTO DITCH/CULVERT
5 DARK(140 STREET LIGHT)
120 DISREGARDED OTHER TRAFFIC! 6 PROPERLY PARKED 1
30 PA14 OFF ROAD INTO WATER
lb
UNKNOWN
1 21 DRIVING WRONG SIDE/WAY
1 9 IMPROPERLY PARXEO 131
OVERTURNED
WEATHER
1 77 ALL DIVERS
1 10 MAKING U-TURN 1
32 OCCUPANT FELL. FROM VEHICLE
1 DRY 2 CLOUDY 3 RAI14
I TSB UNKNOWN
1 11 PASSING 1
3:3 TRACIOR/IRAILOR JACKKNIFE[►
1'
4 FOG 5 ALL OTHERS
;DRIVERS AGE
1 12 DRIVERLESS OR RUNAWAY VEII!
34 FIRE 35 EXPLOSIC14
q
w.
8 UNKITOWN
I VEHICLE DRIVERS AGE
1 77 ALL OTHERS 88 UNkNOUN 1
71 ALL OTHER
ROAD SURFACE
.'NUMBER OF VEHICLES
IVEHICLE DIRECTION 1AC'CIdENT
LANE NUMBER
g
1 DRY 2 WET 3 5LIPPERY
114UMIAER; OF VEHICLES INVOLVED
I E EAST N NORTH I
I►)F14TTFYIN0, LANE OF CRASH
=:=
4 ICY 7 ALI. OTHERS
; IN CRASH
I S SOUTH U UNWHOWN I
w
8 UNK14OWN
I
1 W WEST 1
F
16
Yk
Mr�liu: Hh1UA UtrmillENI up TRANSF'URTATILIN L DETAIL ..0FOR IV95
68703000000846700984810.112 ,-")UEST 1190 350
DATE 10/13/98 TIME 09:1.0
F'AG ` r'►� 1
M
R T H H L
W R 5 R A
T V
V VPI CCD V V UPI CCD V
.� C14 CS 5 1 1414
Y M D 11LUYAVAE I
ED DTC10CRETEMEOhOARAETEMEOMDAkA14ENKNI
RU OI: E L ED
SR
A E 0 A OA PRVRVOA
RE ROT ACFHYHOH
IP14U10HYHDH IPNU I0UIIUI UN
AM 11C SI: E AD
TO
D A N •Y U 14 0 ME MEHTSOFA14ED
IPIV
NA79VEIPIV 14ATSVEhi MLMJ
SP 141 UT P I:E
Aill
T R T RERRFNFN7HUAEFT
LCCEC
DTCREE CEC DTCREE PC PI.PU
HC T ( Ill a E
'1-1)
11 5 0UTUT I
ERDCFRLSHHL
L1 I T I R I L 1.2I T I R2ELEE.ER
R YO 0 S y
E
UAL1 L2HRF
T 100D
AEl
E RO Bl S E2E R0 H2S Pl: RDRE
14 14 T t
RUT T G
SCl. C 0R
I Fl 2F2 8 D
'319003400 87030000 008.591) 1146
5
017800 95 06 07 1.6 3 4 2 04 00 1
1 1 01 03 2 L 1
1 01
01 S 01 01 25 01 03 N 01 03 71 02 00 02
1122486530 87030000 008.590 1146
5
017800 95 06 19 08 3 4 2 03 00 1
1 1 01 03 2 L 2
1 01
01 W 01 17 49 01 03 E:02 77 26 02 00 03
322533000 87030000 008.590 1146
5
017800 95 02 10 16 3 4 2 04 02 1
1 1 01 03 2 L 2
1 01
02 3 01 01 58 01 03 N 02 01 41 03 00 01
322543380 87030000 008.590 1146
5
017800 95 11 05 00 3 4 2 06 00 4
1 1 01 03 2 R 1
1 01
01 E 02 01 49 01 01 E 10 05 35 02 00 01
,. 407418910 87030000 008.590 1146
5
017800 95 01 19 12 3 4 2 03 00 1
1 1 01 03 2 L 1
1 01
01. N 11 01 32 OB 03 S 14 03 76 02 00 01
502865270 87030000 008.590 1146
5
017800 95 10 17 07 3 4 2 03 00 1
2 2 01 03 2 R 2
1 01
01 N 04 01 59 01 05 E 14 11 59 02 00 00
502891820 87030000 009.590 1146
5
017800 95 09 29 07 3 4 2 04 00 1
2 2 01 03 2 L 1
1 01
01 S 14 01 34 01 03 N 01 03 32 Q 00 00
54'0327111.0 87030000 008.590 1146
'503u?.040 87030000
5
017800 95 07 03 12 3 4 2 01 00 1
1 1 01 09 2 R 2
032 R
1 01
01 E 08 01 31 01 02 E 01 02 83 02 00 0 Q��
008.590 1146
:i14507510 87030000 008.'590 i.i46
5
5
017000 95 07 09 17 3 4 2 O1 00 1
017800 95 11 15 11 3 4 2 03 00 1
1 1 01 2
1 1 01 03 2 L 1
1 01
1 02
02" E 08 01 31 01 01 E 01 02 28 02 00 0
WS 01 01 35 01 03 N 04 02 54 1)2 00 00
.314723450 87030000 008.5`'.?0 t146
5
01'7800 95 12 11 16 3 4 2 01 00 3
2 1 01 03 2 R 3
1 01
05 F. 07 01 32 01 05 E 02 01 42 02 00 00
•107409260 87030000 008.720 11.48
5
017800 95 07 02 12 3 4 2 01 01 1
1 1 01 02 1 R 1
1 01
01 N 08 01 30 01 01 H 01 01 27 03 01) 00
=109451760 87030000 008.725 1148
5
017800 95 03 17 07 3 4 2 18 00 1
1 1 01 01 7 L Y
4 0'2
01 W S8 02 00 00 00 00 00 of 00 01
321214541) 87030000 008.745 1.152
5
022300 95 03 12 12 3 4 2 05 00 1
7 7 01 03 2 L 2
1 01
01 S E8 01 25 01 05 S 88 02 39 02 00 00
32-1214580 87030G00 008.745 1.152
5
022300 95 04 19 If 3 4 2 01 00 1
1 1 01 03 2 R 3
1 01
01 E 88 01 44 01 01 E 01 02 24 02 00 01
321223250 87030000 008.745 1152
5
022300 95 02 06 19 3 4 2 03 01 5
1 1 01 03 2 R 2
1 06
01 N 01 01 43 01 02 N 07 01 27 05 00 00
404064040 87030000 008.745 1152
5
022300 95 06 26 19 3 4 2 04 00 1
1 1 01 03 2 L 3
1 01
01 S 14 01 42 01 03 N 01 03 39 02 00 00
407442470 87030000 008.745 1152
5
022300 95 05 19 07 3 4 2 09 00 1
1 1 01 03 2 L 2
1 01
01 E 01 01 43 01 01 S 04 11 29 02 00 00
407669970 87030000 008.745 1152
5
022300 95 06 28 17 3 4 2 01 00 1
1 1 01 03 2 R R
1 01,
01 S 08 01 39 01 01 S 08 01 46 03 00 01
409480940 07030000 008.745 1152
5
022300 95 06 06 17 3 4 2 06 00 1
3 2 01 03 2 I M
1 01
02 S 01 01 37 02 01 W 01 01 27 03 00 02
503205290 07030000 008.745 1152
5
022300 95 08 16 07 3 4 2 03 03 1
1 1 01 03 2 I M
1 01
01 N 09 01 38 01 01 N 01 01 48 03 00 03
503208730 87030000 008.745 1152
5
022300 95 10 18 09 3 4 2 01 00 1
3 2 01 03 2 R U
1 01
01 E 08 01 66 01 01 E 01 02 47 02 00 02
503210590 87030000 008.745 1152
5
022300 95 08 12 14 3 4 2 03 00 1
1 1 01 03 2 R 1
1 01
01 W 14 01 53 01 03 E 01 03 38 02 00 00
',03255040 87030000 008.745 1152
5
022300 95 09 28 22 3 4 2 04 00 8
2 2 01 03 2 I M
1 01
03 E 10 01 57 01 01 W 01 01 20 02 00 00
490 503266780 87030000 008.745 1152
5
022300 95 11 20 14 3 4 2 07 00 1
1 1 01 03 2 I 11
1 02
04 S 01 04 28 01 03 E 01 01 41 02 00 00
`503270450 87030000 008.745 1152
5
022300 95 11 08 16 3 4 2 03 00 1
1 1 01 03 2 R 1
1 01
01 N 14 01 26 01 03 E 02 03 39 02 00 00
503297350 87030000 008.7-15 1.152
5
022300 95 07 06 08 3 4 2 03 00 1
1 1 01 03 2 R 1
1 01
01 E 02 01 22 01 Oi N 14 11 57 02 00 00
S14507150 87030000 008.745 1.152
5
022300 95 11 08 16 3 4 2 03 00 1
1 1 02 01 2 L i
1 01
01 S 01 01 71 01 03 N 03 06 28 02 00 04
410 514747200 87030000 008.745 1152
5
022300 95 11 06 14 3 4 2 77 00 1
1 1 01 03 2 L U
1 03
05 W 09 01 44 00 00 00 00 O1 00 00
520769340 87030000 008.745 1152
407402020 87030000
5
022300 95 09 16 04 3 4 2 04 00 1
"022300
1 1 04 01 2 R 1.
1 02
01 N Oi 01 66 01 03 U 02 03 26 02 00 00
008.825 1153
5
95 01 12 09 4 4 2 03 00 1
1 1 03 04 2 L 2
1 01
01 S 02 01 69 01 05 E 04 03 30 02 00 00
502889650 87020000 008.825 1153
5
022300 95 09 28 14 4 4 2 03 00 1
3 2 01 03 2 U U
i Ot
01 E 13 01 76 01 03 H 02 01 49 02 00 00 _.
503215800 B7030000 008.825 1153
5
022300 95 08 17 11 4 4 2 03 00 1
1 1 01 01 2 T 1
1 01
01 N 12 77 33 02 01 N 02 77 30 02 00 00
303261540 87030000 000.825 1153
5
022300 95 07 16 13 4 4 2 It 00 1
1 1 01 04 2 S I
1 Oi
05 N 88 77 51 09 01 S 88 77 34 02 00 01
' 514708390 97030000 008.825 1153
5
022300 95 12 05 23 4 4 2 17 00 4
1 1 01 03 2 I M
1 01
01 S 01 02 24 00 00 00 00 01 00 00
409470600 87030000 008.863 1153
5
022300 95 06 03 23 4 4 2 03 00 4
3 2 01 03 4 R 1
1 01
01 N 14 01 22 01 03 S 03 03 71 02 00 01
514732530 87030000 009.431 1154
5
022300 95 10 23 09 4 4 2 01 00 1
2 2 01 01 1 R 2
1 01
02 N 09 01 55 02 01 H 02 02 45 02 00 00
.,032t3800 87030000 009.592 1154
5
022300 95 07 19 12 4 4 2 11 00 1
1 1 01 01 4 U S
1 01
O2 U 03 01 60 09 01 S 01 03 29 02 00 01
409490840 87030000 009.620 1154
5
016200 95 06 17 11 4 4 2 04 00 1
1 1 01 03 2 L U
1 01
01 S 01 01 26 01 03 W 03 01 44 02 00 03
'7120792320 87030000 009.620 1154
5
016200 95 11 21 18 4 4 2 01 00 3
1 1 01 03 2 R 1
1 01
03 W 09 01 27 03 03 S 02 01 34 03 00-00
1�i7695800 87030000 009.788 6712
a7
5
016200 95 05 25 16 4 4 2 03 00 1
1 1 03 04 2 L 1
1 03
01 S 06 01 26 00 05 U 88 13 00 02 00 00
409469110 87("30000 009.788 6712
5
016200 95 04 04 17 4 4 2 10 00 1
1 1 01 03 2 L 1
1 03
01 S 06 77 16 01 01 U 20 01 30 01 00 01
`703233930 87030000 009.700 6712
5
016200 95 00 23 14 4 4 2 04 00 1
3 2 01 01 2 L 1
1 01
01 S 01 01 23 01 03 11 02 02 42 02 (10 01)
224 90q21) 87030000 009.'/95 1.157
5
016200 95 05 20 12 4 4 2 03 00 1
1 1 03 01 2 R 1
1 02
01 S 02 01 S7 01 01 F 14 02 66 i2 00 00
l r. r1471 80 87030000 009.795 1157
5
016200 95 09 27 10 4 4 2 03 00 1
2 1 01 04 2 R 2
1 01
01 N 04 01 45 01 01 W 14 01 66 0? 00 00
di; ; 687380 071 j",000 G1)y. Ei'? 1.157
5
0162-00 95 0`i 15 1 ^c r1 4 2 02 00 1
1 1 03 01 1 L. i
1 01.
01. S 14 01. 5O 01 01 N 14 02 3`9 G2 00 02
.ti.
F"INVA DFPARIMENT OF IRANSPORTATION CR IN
68703000000846700984810112 ETAIL FOF ipS5 DATE 10%13/98 TIME 08:10
APU! 0E
11
E L NN
�D lD D
YJEST 498 330
kTH H L U R SRATV V
E N A DAUFkVRV0ADRERDT
FACE
VPICC, D V V VfICC11 V :2
ET
HE TI
HI 0 RE T
ACFHYHO
R T Y UNO ME ME HTSOFANEG
1IPMUI0HYHOE OM H IPNU IGUHUI Uj
U IG UH U7 UN
k Y 0
TO
(i S
IF IV
H kEkkFNFNTNUAEFT L CCEC
S OUT UT
NATSVEIFIV NATSVEMI Mi. HJ
DTCREE CEC
N
S E
h4 T T
IERDCFRL 8NHL L1
UAL1 L2NRF T I00D AEI E
Z DTCREE PCPLPU
k
T I i L L2I TI k2El- EEEk
RDT T G SCLC Hk
kD HI E2E k0 b25 RE EEE
1 F1
2F2 ,
FATAL
CRASH STATISTICS
CRASHES FATALITTES INJURfES��*#�*��*
INJURY CRASH STATS PROPERTY
TOTALS.
DAMAGE
CRASHES I1-IJURIES CRASHES+��+ras��
18 31
CRASHES FATALITIES INJURIES
28
46 31
4
1
. 111.V11 la+\I+• 11+IILt- 1 •./i\ I . ,
U. 111.
.... 1 .10 It, 111R. •JU. It.
' 687O30U1)000846700984810112
Now
VEST INN ' 130
PAGE 1
11
R 1' N H L W
R 6 R A T
V V
1) P I CC
D V V 1) m CC h V
CN CS S 7
1414
Y M D HL U YAEAEI E
D DTC1 0 CPU
Ell
11011UARAEtEMEUhIDARANFNVIII
' R U D E E L
ED
SR
A E D A n A P RV RV G A
RE RO T A C 1"
N Y 111)
11 11` 1•I1)
10 HY 110 11 1 P HU I G I111 UI 1114
A M U C Sc.- E
AD
TO
D A II Y 11 14 U ME HE H T
S OF AN E D
11`1 IV
HA '1S
VE I IV 14A T5 VF lit IIL 11,1
SD MT UT P
RE
AA
T R T RERRFNF14'T11UAEFT
LCCEC:
D1C:I-:EE
CEC D7C:REF lit; PL. NlI
NE I Pi 0
E
11)
11 S 0I!TLIT IERDCFRLS11HL
1-1
1 11
RI L2I TI It'_'EI_ELI-P
" R YU 0 S
S
E
1)ALiL211RF
T I00D AEl
E
F;TI bl
S E2E RD 142S RE RDRE
14 14 T
T
R D T T G
SCLC• I1 R
11
2 F 2 1 II
545459200 87030000 008.467
6705
S
021600 97 O2 02 02 3 4 2 03 18 4 2
1 01 01 7 L X 3
OJ. 01
S INS 77
40 01 01 5 14 77 IT 111 Or- 00
' 510173130 87030000 008.619
1146
5
018600 97 03 10 00 3 ,1 2 8e 00 8 8
0 77 77 2 S 1 0
03 0"
H 08 BB
00 03 02 N 08 01 36 O1. 60 61)
510105150 97030000 008.619
1146
5
021600 97 11 24 13 3 4 2 03 00 1 2
2 O1 03 2 R 1 1
01 01
11 02 01.47
03 01 H 14 03 45 02 00 01)
510190590 07030000 008.619
1146
5
021600 97 ()1 14 1.7. 3 4 2 03 06 3 1
2 01 03 2 L 1 1
01 0.1
W 1.3 01
31 01 01 W 13 01 68 03 00 02
512004250 07030000 008.619
1146
5
021600 97 03 22 15 3 4 2 01 00 1 1
1 01 04 2 T 1. 2
01 05
S 09 01
27 01 05 S 02 02 74 02 00 Or1
312085330 07030000 008.619
1146
5
021600 97 04 14 21. 3 4 2 03 00 4 1
1 01 03 2 R LI 1
01 01
1-1 1.3 01
50 03 03 S lei 02 41 02 00 00
514784SOG 87030000 000.619
1146
5
021600 97 11 20 14 3 4 2 03 00 1. 1
1 01 03 2 L 2 1
01 01
W 1.4 01
27 01 03 E 02 06 31 02 01) 01
521245370 87030000 008.619
1146
5
021600 97 11 01 00 3 4 2 08 00 8 8
8 77 77 3 S 1 0
7'7 00
U 9U EB
00 00 00 01) 00 01. 01) 00
522179870 87030000 008.619
1146
5
021600 97 08 27 00 :3 4 2 88 00 0 0
8 77 77 2 1. 2 0
77 1.R
U 0a 88
00 00 00 00 01) O1 00 I'll)S26281830
87030000 008.619
1146
5
021600 97 04 24 20 3 4 2 03 00 2 1
1 01 03 2 L 1 1
01. 01
It 02 O1
29 01 01 lJ 14 02 3'i 02 OO 01
526282230 87030000 008.619
1146
5
021600 97 03 21 16 3 4 2 03 00 1 1
1 01 03 2 R 1 1
03 O1
E: 14 01
27 01 03 W 02 03 71 02 01) 01)
5262BB330 87030000 008.619
1146
5
011600 97 03 31 15 3 4 2 04 00 1 1
1 Of, 03 2 L 2 1
01 01
11 14 01
10 01 03 II 01 03 71 O2 Ot) 00
526296200 87030000 008.619
1146
5
021600 97 09 04 173 4 2 31 01 2 3
2 04 03 2 L U 1
03 02
IJ 01 01
20 O1 06 W Oi 01 30 113 00 00
326296330 87030000 008.619
1146
5
021600 97 06 27 14 3 4 2 01 00 1 1
1 01 03 2 S 3 1
01 0?
H 01 02
38 01 02 N 08 01 45 ()2 00 1)1
526299870 87030000 008.619
1146
5
021600 97 05 17 10 3 4 2 03 00 1 3
2 01 03 2 R 1 1
01 01
S 02 01
60 01 03 N 04 03 43 02 0t)IN,
537611080 87030000 008.619
1146
5
021600 97 05 06 05 3 4 2 03 09 1 1
1 01 03 2 L 3 1
O1 03
, 01 01
34 10 02 U 12 01 22 03 00 02
- 537615300 87030000 008.619
1146
5
021600 97 04 20 07 3 4 2 03 03 1 1
1 01 03 2 1 N 101
Ol.
W 01 01
41 01 01 W Ol 1,1 31 03 00 00
538022340 87030000 008.619
1146
5
021600 97 06 02 17 3 4 2 O1 00 1 1
1 01. 03 2 S ' 1
03 02
N 1.!£: 01
30 01 '01 Fl 01 152 -5 02 66 C11
538022930 87030000 OOB.619
1146
5
021600 97 07 22 14 3 4 2 03 00 1 1
1 01 03 2 R U 1
02 01
U 01 01
45 01 01 U 02 01 21 03 00 01)
551325480 87030000 008.619
1146
5
021600 97 11 20 10 3 4 2 01 00 1 1
1 01 03 3 T ` 1
01 01
1: 0i3 01
26 03 01 E 01 02 40 02 00 01
, 514724880 87030000 008.784
1152
5
026500 97 04 13 04 3 4 2 04 00 4 1
1 01 03 2 L 1 1
01 01
U 12 01
20 02 03 U 14 o3 36 1)2 00 GO
- S147541DO 87030000 008.784
1152
5
026500 97 03 23 1.9 3 4 2 04 00 4 1
1 01 03 2 R 2 1
01 01.
W 14 01
27 01 03 E 02 06 ^c7 *;- 00 el)
522647860 87030000 009.704
1152
5
026500 97 02 03 IS 3 4 2 06 00 1 1
1 01 03 2 L. L 1
00 O1
U 06 01
58 O1 01 U 1.1 05 3.1 1)? I) +?1)
526272030 87030000 008.7B4
1152
5
026500 97 06 07 01 3 4 2 03 00 e 1
1 O1 03 4 R 2 3
01 01
W 14 01
20 01 03 N 01 03 45' 02 OO 02
526211124/) 07030000 008.784
1152
5
026500 97 03 27 13 3 4 2 03 00 1 1
1 01 03 2 R 3 1
02 O1
Ft 01 01
33 01 03 S 04 03 50 02 00 0+)
" 5262B227O 87030000 008.784
5262VIO90 87030000 000.704
1152
1152
5
5
026500 97 03 05 16 3 4 2 03 00 1 1
1 01 03 2 I I'I 1
03 01
E 02 01
17 01 03 Ei 03 03 20 i:'2 00 O2
537633670 87030000 008,784
1152
5
026500 97 11 02 13 3 4 2 01 00 1 3
026500 97 11 17 14 3 4 2 03 00 1 1
1 01 03 2 L 2 4
1 01 03 2 L. 3 1
01 02
03 01
U 00 01
S 02 01
57 01 01 U 14 11) 2.5 02 OO GO
50 01 01
538022010 87030000 008.784
1152
5
026500 97 08 03 16 3 4 2 01 00 1 1
1 01 03 2 R 2 1
Ol. 0-
H 08 01
E 14 03 42 i)2 OO 00
28 03 01 N Be 02 12 1)2 00 00
538043700 87030000 008.784
538810470 87030000 008.784
1152
1152
5
5
026500 97 11 30 00 3 4 2 88 00 P, 8
026500 97 10 11
8 77 77 c R U 1)
77 016
LI 90 08
C.
00 OO 00 00 00 01 00 1)
538873510 87030000 OOe.784
1152
5
13 3 4 2 01 00 1 1
026500 97 10 OB 09 3 4 2 06 00 1 1
1 01 03 2 L ; 1
1 01 03 2 L 2 1
01 02
01 01
14 Oe of.39
IJ t)c^. 11
Ol 01 t4 O1 02 6(3 1:-2 00 C11)
61) 01 G1 S 01 01 "1 +13
- 5.39355070 87030000 008.784
U6284950 87030000 OOB.797
1152
6710
5
5
026500 97 05 17 01 3 4 2 77 00 4 3
026500 97
2 1:1 03 2 t� 1 1
01 C1.
H :?1 01
00 02
?e 01 01 E 05 0^c 0O Q2 C-0 OI)
522195920 87030000 008- 8/6
1153
5
02 17 14 3 4 2 01 00 1 1
O,MMO 97 013 30 04 4 •1 2 22 00 4 1
1 01 01 1 L 1 1
1 77 01 1 11 1.1 1
01 1)2
-0 1. O.l
U 08 01
N 01 O1
24 01 01 W 01. 02 47 02 01) 00
23
526293050 871)30000 008. ('95
551320740 87030000 008. 952
1153
7633
5
5
026500 97 11 O5 20 4 4 2 06 00 4 1
1 01. 01 3 L. 1. 1
O1 O1
IJ 05 01
00 OO 00 00 Oi 00 0+)
51 01 Oti lJ 1.3 65 58 1)2 OO 1}3
_
' 526254700 871)30000 009.41)5
1154
5
026500 97 11 27 18 4 4 2 01 22 4 1
026500 97 01 16 00 4 4 2 01 01 1 1
1 01 01 1 L 2: 2
1 01 08 1 R
Al. 02
lJ 08 01
18 04 01 14 01 02 30 t;? 00 t)1
53802.0910 07030000 0G9.598
1154
5
026500 97 11 17 2-1 4 4 2 17 00 1 1
1 1
1 O1. 01 1 L. S 1
01 +.)i
O1 O1
It Ot3 ()1
W 01 77
47 01 Ui N 09 i+) 43 1!3 OO GO
51
538022440 87030000 009.608
503274570 87030000 009.655
1154
1154
5
Gc6500 97 06 12 14 4 4 2 01 22 1 3
2 01 0 1 L 1
01 01
5 08 ()1
00 00 00 00 1)L 00 01
25 01 01 S Of. 02 �:; l!2 0U 01
512057130 87030000 009.655
1154
5
5
0.3000 97 01 12 19 4 4 2 04 04 2 2
023000 97 06 216 03 4 4 2 77 00 4 1
3 01. 03 '2 L ll
1 01 03 1, 11 PI 3
0:3 01
01 01
S 14 01
20 01 03 S 02 06 221)2 00 01
514782leO 87030000 009.6J5
520307080 870:30000 009.655
1154
1154
5
023000 97 09 24 00 4 4 2. 77 00 4 3
2 01 01 2 L U 1
01 01
i 02 02
W 1.0 01
30 00 00 01) 01) Ul OO +:11
2400 88 U 68 77 00 r2 00 C1:
522196070 87030000 009. 635
1154
5
5
023000 97 12 01 154 4 2 06 00 1 1
023000 97 11 01 05 4 4 2 77 00 8 7
1 Of. 01 S 1 i
7 7 7 7 7 2R S 1
01 O1
O L
E: 14 01
59 02 07 E 03 C,2 4`'s
52627656/) 87030000 009.655
1154
5
G2:3000 97 03 21 08 4 4 2 01 00 1 1
1 01 03 ^c R 2 1
77
01 01
N 01 02
FI 0EI 1)1.
23 0+) 00 OO C, 1)1 OO 1..;)
29 02 ril '
53B817871) 87030000 009.6115
338875131) 87030000 009. 635
1154
1154
5
5
023000 97 05 24 07 4 4 2 03 00 1 1
1 01 03 2 R 1
'2
01 01
N 01 01
QI tl 02 30 4 02 O)
33 01 0? W E8 1)3 ,Iq o) C.C. t:l
- 5388-5696 87030000 009. r.'35
1154
5
023000 97 04 10 17 4 4 2 01 00 1 2
02:3000 97 0S O5 1.9 4 4 2 04 00 4 1
2 01 01 2 1. 11; 1
1 O1 03 2 L U 1
01 O1
01 01
S 08 01
LI
5e 01 01 � i)i 10 :;4 +: � 0+) 1;+)
541779640 07030000 009.ti55
1154
5
023000 97 11 01 12 4 4 2 01 00 1 1
1 01 03 2 L 2 1
02 01
14 01
LI 00 01
37 01 03 U 04 0_'
41 C1:3 O1 U O1 02 lt, 62 01} 00
r
68703000000BW670098481;'4bl"LJ-1 trio IU14 --t.,NA AA112 ....... i IY,`
0112 ru1% f UHIE IV/13/98 I IME
UEST 098 350
c N S PACE
R-u E E 14N R T H H L W R 9 R A T V 9
ED SR Y M D H L U Y AE AE I E 0 V V PI CC D V V
m C Sc A E TC: 1 0 C R ET EM E an UPI CC D V
0 DA RA ET EM E OM OA RA 14E NX 141
P.- E AD To D A A 0 A P RV RV 0 A RE RD T A C F HY HO H IP 14U 10 HY HO H 1p 14U 10 till Ul UN
14 T UT P RE AA 14 Y Li 14 0 ME ME H T OF AN E D
E T I ?I T R T
a R E R FN F IP IV NA TS VE IP IV NA TS VE MI ML MJ
R Y 0 () E TO N T 14 J AE FT L C CE C
S H S D TC RE E CE C D TC RE E
s E OUT UT I E � k DC FR L S N H L Li I T I R BC PL VU
-N
N T U A Ll L2 N R F T 10 0 D I L L2 I T I R2 EL EE ER
T R D T T 0 A El E R a III S E2 E R 0 B2 9 RE RD RE
Mi6241�87030000 009.655 S CL C 0 R I F1 2 F2 S D
0 7030000 009.65-) 54 5 023000 97 06 26 14 4 4 2 06 77 1 0 03 2 S I 1 01 0 04 01 38 01 07 E 04 01 26 020000
40 87030000 009.674 34 5 023000 97 01 15 04 4 4 2 03 00 4 1 1 0 03 2 2 4 02 0 02 01 29 ot 01 U 12 02 49 02 00 02
154 5 023000 97 11 25 15 4 4 2 01 00 1 1 1 Ot 0 3 L I I ol 01 00 01 32 01
-8703000.009.674 54 5 023000 97-00 12 15 4 4 2 17 00 1 1 1 0 0 1 M M 1 01 01 01 U 01 02 49 02 00 00
eo '-8703"00 009.602 1157 -5 023000 97 07 12 09 4 4 2 27 00 1 1 1 01 01 1 R S 1 01 Of
87030000 009.830 37 88 77 70 00 00 00 00 01 00 01
3 023000 97 02 16 10 4 4 2 01 01 3 2 01 01 2 R 1 14 17 77 00 77 0 88 77 00 02 00 01
o. SM0000 009:030 1157 5 023000 97 03 21 07 4 4 2 77 00 1 1 01 04 2 R 1 03 Of N so 77 32 01 ol N 80 02 52 02 Q0 00
760 87030000 oog 830 1157 5 023000 97 04 04 15 4 4 2 03 00 1 1 01
Isawlemo 97030000 009' 2 1 02 01 N 01 0 24 00 ot W 89 03 00 02 00 01
030 137 04.2 L 2 1 01 09
1400 70300o 009:830 57 5 023000 97 06 22 10 4 4 2 03 00 1 3 2 01 01 2 R 1 1 01 01 07 0
340MM- 0 87030000 009 g3() 5 023000 97 03 10 17 4 4 00 0 01 S 10 02 72 03 00 03
2 06 00 1 1 1 01 01 2 R 2 01 01 01 01 23 01 03 S 02 03 33 02 00 01
176MO 87030000 009:830 57 5 023000 97 04 25 21 4 4 2 03 00 1 2 1 0 01 2 R 01 01 20 01 o5 W 14 03 35 02 00 02
7 5 023 1
immo. 7 009-B30 1157 000 97 It 26 09 4 4 2 05 00 1 1 1 01 01 01 02 01 20 01 03 S 06 03 20 02 00 00
5
1332490 B 7 5 023000 97 09 04 16 4 4 2 11 00 1 2 2 01 04 2 T 03 05 "05 01 29 01 01 13 03 60 02 00 ol
10199760 009-830 1157 04 2 T I 1 07 77 U 01 01 30 00 77 Be o3 00 02 00 00
a 7 009-848 1158 3 023000 97 It 25 17 4 4 2 06 00 4 1 1 01 04 3 S 1 1 02 01 W 14 01 74 01 It W 02 15 30 02 00 00
8 0 87 5 023000 97 02 It 08 4-4 2 It 00 1 1 1 Of 0 1 2 S 1 1 02 03 E 04 01 41 09 ol N 88 77 24 02 00 01
a 009.848 Ilss 5 023000 97 03 10 13 4 4 2 01 00 1 1 1 01 0
*10 7 009.848 1158 . I "'; .. - . 3 2 R I 1 01 02 N 08 01 62 02 02 N 08 01 40 03 00 01
023000 97 02 12 18 4 4 2 03 00 3 1 1 01 03 2 R I
01 01 W 01 01 60 77 01 N 03 11 42 02 00 OG
FATAL CRASH STATISTICS
INJURY CRASH STATS
CRASHES PROPERTY
FATALITIES INJURIES C TOTALS.
RASHES DAMArjE
INJURIES CRASHES
4.. 27 38 CRASHES FATALITIES INJURIES
40
67
ge
0
0
RU
AM
OE
UC
E
SC
1
7 I
HI
H E
R
YH
H
. .. �.... � ,: i...l
h976�30UUG1:iU134hr1)OSE3g81U11�,
.i 4Ui...... •ialil' .•. ii11.L G t 1:::.. ...I11.
UEST H.0 350
..... •.7/ 7l. 111f fU. 1.1 fY1GL .L
M
R I H H L W R SRA'1 V V
VPI CCU V V VPICCU V
I
1414
Y
M
D H L U Y AE AE I E D D TC I O C R Er FM
E OM DA RA ET EM E Ott DA RA HE 1414 NI
L
ED
SR A
E
0
A OA PRVRV6A RERDTACFHY110HIFt4UI0F1YHOH
IPt4UI011HUIU14
E
AD
TO D.
A
14
Y U 14 0 MEMEHT 9OF AHED IP IV
NA ISVEIPIV 144ISVEMI MLMJ
P
RE
AA T
R
T
RERRFNF14IHUAEFT LCCEC
DTCREE CEC DTCREE PCHLHU
D
E
TU
H
S OUT UT IERDCFRLS14F1L L1
I T I RI L2I T I R2ELEEER
S
5
E
UAI_S L2NRF T I00D AEI E
PO PI S E2E RD P2S RERDRE
T
T
R D T T O SCLC 0R
1 F1 2F2 ' S D
502875450
07030000
008.590
1146
512071550
87030000
008,590
1146
514530380
87030000
008.590
1146
520342930
87030000
008.590
1146
520347070
87030000
008.590
1146
520349600
87030000
008.590
1146
522156330
87030000
008.590
1146
' 5MI92160
87030000
008.590
1146
5226341170
87030000
008.590
H 46
��522646480
07030000
008.590
1146
`•, 522648340
87030000
008.590
1146
rr 1. MMS630
87030000
008.590
1146
v 539291750
87030000
008.590
1146
540604870
87030000
008.590
1146
540640750
87030000
008.590
1146
522602120
67030000
008.725
1148
522610320 87030000 008.725 1148
503233040 87030000 008.745 1152
514513320 87030000 008.745 1152
514706330 97030000 008.745 1152
i 515954030 87030000 008,745 1152
520306000 87030000 008.745 1152
522169170 87030000 008.745 1152
522177080 87030000 008.745 1152
522180880 07030000 008.715 1152
540605990 87030000 008.745 1152
514708430 87030000 008.625 1153
520311460 87030000 008.844 1153
522189910 87030000 008.720 1153
503214000 87030000 008.9'10 1153
503246060 97030000 009.020 1153
520337400 87030000 009.220 1153
502897470 87030000 009.620 1154
503214160 87030000 009.620 1154
514508050 87020000 009.62-0 1154
520703760 87030000 007.620 1154
539267420 87030000 009.620 1154
540610850 87030000 009.634 1154
520345440 87030000 009.729 1156
530855890 87030000 009.708 6712
512069230 87030000 009.795 1157
538888560 87030000 009.7?5 1157
522150610 87030000 009.795 1157
017900 96 09 27 22 3 4 2 01 00 4 1 1 01 03 2 R 1 i Of 01 U 08 01 36 01 01 U O1 02 56 02 00 01
01760096091916342030013201032R210101 W02012801105060646020000
017800 96 07 27 11 3 4 2 06 00 1 1 1 01 03 2 R 2 1 10 05 H 03 01 42 01 10 N 05 02 00 02 01) 01
017800 96 12 11 14 3 4 2 04 00 1 1 1 01 03 2 L 2 1 01 02 14 12 01 62 01 01 5 14 01 40 03 00 02!
017800960310173420300132Of 032R310101 E02Of 27 03 05 E 130200020000
01780096062420342It 0041. 101032RU 1 09 01 E0801280101H017744020001
017800960721 IS 3 4 2 27 00 1 1 10103211M 1 01 01 W1901270106UOf 0500020000
0170009611021434201001 11 Of 052RU301 02S07012701059Of 02SO020000
017800 96 08 28 14`3 4 2 01 00 1 2 1 01 03 2 T 2 1 01 02 N 08 01 50 01 02 N 01 02 36 02 00 01
0178009610192.13 4 2 05 00 4 1 1 01 03 2 R 3 1 1001 H12Of 250105E020359020001
017000 96 10 16 11 3 4 2 03 00 1 2 1 01 03 2 L I 1 01 O1 S 14 01 56 01 03 U 01 03 36 02 OO 00
017800 96 09 03 09 3 4 2 01 00 1 2 1 01 03 2 T R 2 01 01 F. 01. 02 45 01 02 E 08 01 39 02 00 00
017800 96 11 04 18 3 4 2 04 00 1 1 1 01 03 2 R 1 1 01 Of W 01 01 16 01 03 E 02 03 37 02 00 00
01780096060118342020011 101012R2101 0*3H0801400101 N 010255020000
017000 96 05 10 08 3 4 2 01 00 1 1 1 01 03 2 S R 1 01 05 H 01. 01 28 O1 09 H 01 02 38 Oa 01) 01
017800 96 06 22 17 3 4.2 07 77 1 1 1 01 01 2 LI U 1 O1 77 U 04 01 34 03 04 U 08 02 00 02 00 O2
01780096070412342060013201 017L.k 1 01. 01 S 0 1 0123000611080200021)001)
022300 96 01 24 16 3 4 2 04 00 1 1 1 01 03 2 L 3 1 Of 01 S 01 01 35 01 03 U 03 03 42 02 00 Q0
022300 96 02 06 16 3 4 2 01 00 1 1 1 01 03 2 L 2 1 01 01 S 08 01 32 00 77 U 80 77 00 02 00 00
022300960529173 420306532Of 032LU 1 0101E.14024703013020130030001
022300 96 10 07 16 3 4 2 01 00 1 1 1 01 03 2 L 1 1 03 02 S 88 01 34 03 01 S 88 02 38 02 00 00
022300 96 01 25 15 3 4 2 03 00 1 1 2 01 03 2 R 1. 1 01 01 W 15 01 24 01 01 N 01. 03 73 02 01) 01
02230096090906342060023201032R 1 1 0101. N1401330301E010230020001
022300 96 08 23 19 3 4 2 01 00 4 3 2 01 03 2 R 1 1 01 01 E 00 01 53 03 01 E 01 02 17 Q 00 01
022300 96 06 08 11 3 4 2 06 00 1 1 1 n1 03 2 U U 1 01. 05 S 03 01 00 00 05 U 88 02 00 02 1)0 01)
022300 96 08 00 12 3 4 2 01 01 1 1 1 01 03 2 L 1 1 01 02 U 09 77 28 03 02 S 08 01 40 03 00 01
022300 96 O1 13 21 4 4 2 77 00 4 1 1 01 03 2 R S 1 01 01 H 88 02 00 00 00 OO 00 61 00 00
022300 96 02 24 17 4 4 2 22 01 1 1 1 01 03 1 M H 1. 03 02 S 10 01 17 01 02 S O7 01 17 03 00 (N)
022300 96 05 07 18 4 4 2 01 00 1 1 1 01 01 1 R 2 1 01 01 H 08 01 37 01 01 N Be 01 52 63 00 00
022300 96 05 15 c^2 4 4 2 03 00 1 1 1 01 01 4 L 1 1 01 01 U 14 01 86 01 04 5 02 04 01) 02 01) O0
022300 96 05 25 08 4 4 2 01 00 1 1 1 01 01 4 R 2 1 01 01 N 01 01 25 01 77 H 08 03 40 02 00 01
022300 96 04 30 14 4 4 2 06 00 1 2 1 01 01 2 R 1 1. 06 06 H 11 01 54 01 06 14 Be 02 31 02 00 01)
016200 96 02 02 11 4 4 2 04 00 1 2 1 01 03 2 L 1 1 01 01 S 14 01 71 01 03 ti 01 03 20 02 00 OO
01620096040620442770041101032R5 1 10 01 NO301300008U8077000200 02
016200 96 03 09 03 4 4 2 16 22 4 1 1 Of 01 2 R S 1 01 01 N 01 12 30 00 00 00 00 01 00 00
01620096010718442090021101012 U U 1 01 01 S It 0132010190101221)30400
016200961214054422600311 01032Mi1301 01 U 01 02 24 00 00 00 00 01 00 01
016200 96 05 11 16 4 4 2 01 00 1 1 1 01 01 1 L 1 1 01 01 S 00 01 61 01 01 S 08 01 43 03 00 05
016200 96 05 03 14 4 4 2 03 00 1 1 1 01 04 2- R 1 1 01 01 1.1 02 01 29 01 03 14 01. 03 23 0? 00 01)
01620096110108442100011701042T 1101 01 H0277260103W020136010001
016200 96 1.2 04 13 4 4 2 04 00 1 1 1 01 01 2 1 M 1 01 U1 E 1.3 01 60 01 03 U 14 06 56 02 no 02
016200 96 09 04 15 4 4 2 03 00 1 1 1 01 04 2 R i 1 01. 01 H 01 01 33 01 01 E 13 03 27 02 00 02
016200 96 06 17 13 4 4 2 03 06 1 1 1 01 01 2 R 2 1 01 01 U 04 01 26 01 01 t1 02 01 29 03 00 ON
0 0
Nf4
,R 0 E E
'A.fi;a :,' U C SC E AD TO 9 8.,; N T UT F RE AR
N E .. T I AI D E TD
°"'" R Y0 0 T �' ;'' N N E
�
FATAL CRASH STATISTICS.
�'"� MNtfMIFMpKMkiPkldkMtfkNIF1E
KKKwKKKKKKK
�' �,'+!• CRASHES FATALITIES INJURIES
R� 1 "+�3•Y 11
�t
CIO
r ••
D
T
I
Y� n` D �' UEST a9N �5p ... .. ..�i�.. ..,� r� . .1J�t .,.. !.t •
RTH H L W R SRATV9
�; FAGE2
NLUYAEAEIED DTCI0CkETEMEOMDARAETEMEOMDARANENKHI
A DA PMEMEHT OF AOTACFHYHDHIFNUIGNYHbNIPNUIOUNUIUN
k T Y UNb ME ME HTSOFA14ED
kERRFNFNTNUAEFT L CCECVDTCREEEIFIV NATSVEMI MLMJ
H S DUTUTI ERDCFRL SNHL L1 I T I kl CECo0TCREE DCPLPU
RDT1T2GRF SCLCDaAEl E RO PIS LyL..I T I k2ELEEER
1 F1 E2 E k 0 P2 S RE RO RE
2 F2 S D
INJURY CRASH STATS
KKKKKIfKKK#IQKIEKItKKKKKK
CRASHES INJURIES
21 30
t
0
PROPERTY
DAMAGE
CRASHES
22
IfK1f1EKKM1E1F1ETOTALS
R1f1iifk1�iK**m**Kk*x# 4
CRASHES FATALITIES INJURIES
43 30
Ll
0
b87uaVUUOq(�d4biU0�84810112
•11. VI. ... .11.1111 114 L- 4% L ♦- 1 .. .AIL
«+_;..
UEST SQH 350
•.J/It .1.1 IL ..... JJ .
FAGS 42
M
R T H H L U R SRATV V
VPICCD V V VPICCD V
j,R'Uylt.,pE
S
E
I
L
NN
EO
SR
Y
M
D H L U Y AE AE I E D D TC I 0 C R ET EM
RERO7ACFHYHOHIPHU10NYHOHIPNU10UHUIUN
E OM CA RA ET EM E DM CA RA NE NK 14I
UC
SC
E
AD
TO
A E
D. A
0
N
A 0A PRVRV0A
Y U N 0 ME ME HTSOFAllED IF IV
NA ISVEIPIV NATSVEMIMLhJ
?SB,NT
UT
P
RE
AA
7 R
T
RERRFNFNTHUAEF7 LCCEC
DTCkEE CEC DTCREE PCKiN
. H E '` T I
BI
0
E
TD
H
S 0 UT UT I E R DC FR L S N H L Li
I T I Rl L L2 I T I R2 EL EE ER
+' R Y0
0
5
S
E
UALlL2NRF T 100D AEl E
R0 H1 S E2E R0 H2S RERDRE
H
N
T
T
R D T T G SCLC M R
i F1 2F2 S D
CRASH SThTISTICS
FATALITIES INJURIES
INJURY CRASH STATS
CRASHES INJURIES
21 30
PROPERTY
DAMAGE
CRASHES
22
11
TOTALS.
CRASHES FATALITIES INJURIES
43 30
z
Trip Generation Data
s 3 - 'rul 6 1
RAW
Metro -bode TrodrporfrfronAsn: LAY A J#j'$
m p
2000 STAGE OP 2015 LRTP ALTERNATIVE OOU
DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION SUMMARY
ORIGIN
ZONE
------------- CARDINAL DIRECTIONS -------------
NNE FINE ESE
TOTAL
SSE SSW WSW WNW NNW
661 TRIPS
PERCENT
185 121 107 313 15--. 252
15-14 9.90 2.54
1222
4.42 8.76 25.61 13.01 20.62
662 TRIPS
PERCENT
38 10 1 8 is 31 is
22.75 5.99 49
167
160 4.79 8.98 18.56 8.98 29.34
663 TRIPS
PERCENT
334 " 15.5 57 149 186 525 379 452
14.93 6.93 2.55
2237
6.66 8.31 23.47 16.94 20.21
664 TRIPS
PERCENT
936 436 139 114 1074 2201 1769 1767
11.10 5.17
8436
1.65 1.35 12.73 26.09 20.97 20.95
665 TRIPS
PERCENT
231 130 5 30 215 469 362 388
12.62 7.10
1830
.27 1.64 11.75 25.63 19.78 21.20
666 TRIPS
PERCENT
354 199 110 71 550 1543 1361 1248
6.51 3.66 2.02
5436
1.31 10.12 28.38 25.04 22.96
667 TRIPS
PERCENT
1268 478 81 105 1094 2596 2066 2576
12.35 4.66
10264
.79 1.02 10.66 25.29 20.13 25.10
668 TRIPS
PERCENT
193 168 7 32 278 852 957 1042
5.47 4.76
3529
.20 .91 7.88 24.14 27.12 29.53
669 TRIPS
PERCENT
3873 1054 19 285 1426 6620 5423 6804
15-19 4.13
25504
.07 1.12 5.59 25.96 21.26 26.68
670 TRIPS
PERCENT
894 167 10 42 117 1045 955 1349
19.52 3.65
4.579
.22 .92 2.56 22.82 20.86 29.46
671 TRIPS
PERCENT
2843 339 25 53 87 1245 1287 1436
38.87 4.63
7315
.34 .72 1.19 f,7.02 17.59 19-63
672 TRIPS
PERCENT
650 202 6 33 59 368 287 395
32.50 10.10
2000
.30 1.65 2.95 18.40 14.35 19.75
673 TRIPS
PERCENT
783 242 25 41
21.69 6.70 177 852 675 815
3610
-69 1.14 4.90 23.60 18.70 22.58
674 TRIPS 3158 858 536 269 972 4427 2961
PERCENT 3614 16795
18-80 5.11 3.19
1.60 5.79 26.36 17.63 21.52
675 TRIPS 1720 675 209 477
PERCENT 964 2695 2088 2717 11545
14-90 5.85 1.81 4.13 8.35 23.34 18.09 23.53
C
Transit Information
Route 48
Qk*4
WHEELCHAIRt3
lo�'totn = the stop
to allow wheelcMIra on
or off the bus.
pipimmmi IS
Hardee
ISITY
MIL
EFFECTIVE: IVE: February 24, 1999
REIMUED: 7/28/6#
OMNI
INTERNATIONAL
MAIL
NE 15 St ® �~
NE 14 St y
2
d
6-6-
NW/NE 3 St
itown
ttlrtal --�
SW/SE 1 St
SE2St
co
SE 4 St
N S ROAD
6�Ql0
v
Mercy Way
MERCY
HOSPITAL
North
Map no�tttto scale
A
* * * * PR9PARHD
by MDTA SCIMDULING* * * * *
METRO DADS TRANSIT AGENCY
METROBUS
48 --
ROUTE:
48
M.D.T.A. ROTARY
PAGE: 1
SOtgmOUND
WEEKDAY
DATE: 260UL98
ie 9stoafitlseeaestyaaaaszarsrSaaaersr+�aassbieasxaaaat asstsoasa
aea seb=e¢aaa-asses:acaasCxsaaaac=nasaanAaaaaaeaaa=v=cmace¢saaaaaaasss
OMNI-SO MIAMI VIA S.BAYStIORE
DR.
TIME: 5:31 AM
teams¢a�saesstcaneaaaaxstearsa¢aioet=a-=asar:aa=stroasasnsssn=assassaa
aaa as a ca a=,,=ssmasss an sae¢ears=va¢aa assssacs:s=ssas:a syaesttssa set
RUH
BLOCK NOTEC D-11 CAR -OUT OMNI
SW1S
13ST MRCY
DOLS
UNIV
SOUT GAR -IN
D-I{
TRIP L-O
NO.
NO.
FR-LINE TERM
1AVE
DRKL HOSP
ROAD
STAT
MIAM FR-LINE
TIME TIME
9214
2
SET PA-5:06 5:31
5:40
5:46 5:55
6:11
6:29
6:36
65 19
9213
1
6:28
6:40
6:47 6:59
7:15
7:33
7:40
72 15
9244
9215
2
3
# FR--882
7:28
7:40
7:47 7:59
8:10
8:15
8:26
0:33
8:35*PA-8:45
0:40
#
25
72 15
9214
2
8:28
8:40
8:47 8:59
9:15
9:33
9:40
72 16
- - ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
9213
1
9:28
9:40
9:41 9:59
1015
1032
1039
71 17
9215
3
1028
1040
1047 1059
1115
1132
1139*PA-1149
#
71
9214
2
1128
1140
1147 1159
1215
1232
1239*PA-1249
R
71
9213
1
1228
1240
1247 1259
1:15
1:32
1:39*PA-1:49
#
71
9216
4
1:28
1:40
1:47 1:59
2:15
2:32
2:39
71 19
9217
5
2:28
-
2:402:47
2:59
3:16
3:353;4274
- ________--_----
16 .._-----..
9237
6
3:28
3:40
3:48 4:00
4:17
4:36
4:43
75 15
9216
4
4:28
4:40
4:48 5:00
5:17
5:36
5:43
75 15
9217
5
5:28
5:40
5:48 6:00
6:17
6:36
6:43
7S 21
9237
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6
6:20
6:40
6:48 7:00
7:14
7:29
7:35*PA-7:45
#
67
9216
4
7:30
7:40
7:47 7:56
8:10
8:25
8:31*PA-8:41
#
61
suers=a=aan at�S-aL't:.^_�aasaiCCr:ffiaC�11a.�OnaG����C�aa�aa�mc=�a��3aaa�oG��aaCac�aa7-acac�-oso Qawe a•L���aaesa3saassatt �iaaa
OPERATOR CHANGES * -- TRIP ENDS
SET-- FARE _ $1.25
*****PnPARBD BY MM
SCHRDULING*****
METRO DARE TRANSIT AGENCY
METROBUS
48 --
ROUTE: 48
M.D.T.A. ROTARY
PAGE:
2
NORTIMOUND
WEEKDAY
DATE:
26JUL98
�as3'ertataleeaf*ittlsslxxaaaafemraaaeauaesesaaaa5ts-=aaaaczsYseacsffitrrsssasecaaxsxat=axra=assxxsxstasxssrsce=rsb=tacaaxxnnz==ar
OMNI-SO MIAMI
VIA S.BAYSNORE
DR,
TIME:
5:06 AM
ffitm!lisRikb�esffiffiCaffis�naafreffi=sssascssszmsses=aria=xamr:aaeaa=ease===ac=eaccossosamtaaa=a.axxa;asac:r-.easseaexaaxa==asa=a=n
RON BLOCK
NOTE D-11
GAR -OUT SOOT
UNIV
DGLS MRCY
13ST
SWIS
OMNI GAR -IN D-I1
TRIP L-0
NO.
NO.
>+R-LINB MIAM
STAT
ROAD IIOSP
I3RKL
LAVE
TERM FR-LINE
TIME TIME
9213
1 SET
PA-4:55 5:06
5:13
5:26 5:39
5:50
6:00
6:14
68
14
9215
3 SET
PA-5:44 5:55
6:03
6:21 6:37
6:50
7:00
7:14
79
14
9214
2
6:55
703
7:21 7:37
7:50
8:00
6:14
79
14
9213
1
7:5S
8:03
8:21 8:37
8:50
9:00
9:14
79
14
9215
3
8:55
9:03
9:21 9:37
9:50
1000
1014
79
14
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
9214
2
9:56
1004
1022 1038
1050
1100
1114
78
------------
14
9213
1
1056
1104
1122 1138
1150
1200
1214
78
14
9216
4 SET
PA-1145 1156
1204
1222 1238
1250
1:00
1:14
78
14
9217
5 SET
PA-1245 1256
1:04
1:22 1:36
1:50
2:00
2:14
78
14
9237
6 SET
- -
PA-1:45 1:56
2:04
2:22 2:38
2:50
3:00
30.4
78
14
9216
4
-- - 2:58
306-3:22-3:38-3:50-4:00
4:14 -
- 76 --14
-------
9217
5
3:58
4:06
4:22 4:38
4:50
5:00
5:14
76
14
9237
6
4:58
5:06
5:22 5:38
5:50
6:00
6:14
76
3.4
9216
4
5:58
6:06
6:22 6:38
6:50
7:00
7:13
75
17
9217
5
7:04
7:11
7:26 7:40
7:51
8:00
8:13*PA-8:36 #
69
a^saarsar:aaatrsa=x=xaasaza�=csaarssa==ar:==ar:aa==arsaasx========rasa=======x===x==a:=x=====a=a a=r-s======sasnmaas
OPERATOR CHANGES
* -- TRIP ERRS
SET-- FARE s $1.25
-'
=ar:=�r:amrsa=xr:uaxr;==xr:x=vaas=r=c esxx�a====-xa==a=�xxxx=aao�=ac_r=a.arsa
arsaaxv=xe�==__x=xa�==x;x;-==cs=s=c=x
Route B
GOVERNMENT DOWNTOWN
CENTIER STATION
L-m--
r
00"TOWN
WA TERMINAL
NWINE 3 81LU
..,
ev
9W/SE 191 gn
SE2at {
SE 4
11 SW/SE 7 St
SW/SE 8 St
Rlclaenbaoker Causeway
DESTINATION SIGN 10
NORTH DOWNTOWN MIAMI - 021 D SEAGUARIUM
SOUTH KEY BISCAYNE VIA HARBOR - 021 E
SOUTH KEY BISCAYNE VIA CRANDON - 0220
NOT IN SERVICE - 02DO
CRANDON
■ PARK
vt 15
dnpatns Dr Map nNo�to scale
spa
KEY
SISCAYNE
EFFECTIVE: February 24, 1898
REISSUED: 4/18/98
.. .. ti..-. G..
.. - 1.. _. ..i ........
...-.. 1
.... ..
.
0
*****Pr%EPARE0
PY
MOTA ;,�:HEGULINC2*****
METRO
DADE TRANSI t AGENCY
VIETROBUS
RoUCE: C
M.D.T.A. ROTARY
PAGE:
�
M I A14I •-GOUND
WFEI,"DAY
DATE:
19APR?S
=a:ana=znnaraeafsr_am+x;a>:r;az_saae2au=ra=_..=Lscz=zaia.cfxa_:
f:o::n=fazac=a=c==_
__-=errs:a-aC=ara=z==3==-=uaat
CUD -KEY l3ISCAYNE
VIA S. DAYSHORE
TIME:
6:34 AM
==Ci+3=:3�=:SSCSl
isL L:Sa�=ama tasaar 4Gf".'::OCCC==L•.--..=5=�-6:2:.-=L�=..-.1:Ga====rIIa_=_C7..=..�-Y'!:C-CrQ6II-=C=_=__ni`.:=-�_�__
RUN
BLOCK
NOTE
D-H GAR -OUT WWOR 14RDR CAPE
111All
PRkt-
SWI'S GAR- 1N D-H
TRIP
L-O
NO.
NCl.
FR-LINE CRAN HTHR PARK;
SEAT:
SPAT
LAVE FR-LINE
TIME
TIME
1142
1
CWS
C• : a4 6: 3c•
6 : 4 7'
6 : 5?9
7 v OT
:::3
2
1143
2
CC
6:49 Cam: 51
7 : 02'
7: 14
7 : LZ
33
2
1144
3
CW5
7:04 7:0
T:IT
7:29
7:37
_.
2
1145
4
CC
T:19 7:Zl
I':3Z
T:44
T:^iZ
a3
2
1146
-----------_CWS-------_-__--_?_34-7
►
36-----_Ts47--
----_-_--_..-----_-----..---------------.-
8007
33
1147
6
CC
7:4:v T:51
8:0Z
0:14
SsZZ
33
Z
_
1142
1
CWS
8: U4 8: 06
:3: 1 T
0:29
8: 37
33
2
1143
Z
CC
8:19 8:21
8:3Z
8:44
8:52
13
2
1144
3
CWS
8: 33 8: 35
8:46.
8 %58
9 : 07*CE-9: 2 5 #t
4
1145
4
CC
8:40 8:560
?:Q1
?:13
9:ZZ
34
is
1 146
5
Ci15
9203 9:05.
9 : t 6.
9 : Z3
9 ::37*CE-9 : 55 #
:34
-
1147
6
CC
9: 19 9:: Q
?:'31
9:43
9:5Z
33
2
114Z
1
CNS
9:33 9:35
9 z 46
9:58
1007*CE-10Z5 #
:::4
1143
,'_
CC
9:49 ?:Fn
1001
1013
10ZZ
33
2
1145
4
CWS
1016 1020
1031
1043
1052
34
2
! 14T
6CC
104:� IUFfCi
1101
1113
-- --r
1 !c2
�:3
-
2
-------- •-u
1143
2
CWS
1113 11 ZO
11'Z 1
i .143
11'3Z*CE-1 Z 1() #
:3 4
1145
4
CC
1147 1148
1159
121:3
IZZZ
05
2
1 14 T
,_.
CW5
1 Z 1'5 I Z I T
I ZZ9
I Z43
1 Z"-#Z
37
Z
1 148
T
CC
1.4,5 1 Z47
1259
1 :13
1 :22
36
2
114.ri
4
C:W5
1 . 15 ! . 17
1 :2.9
1 :43
------•--------
1 :FIZ
j7
----L-------
- • - ---
1147
6
CC
1:4.5 1:47
1:C49
Z:1:3
2:ZZ
36
2
1 148
7
CWS
:�:15 2:17
2:2 9
2:4 3
2:52
37
2
1096
8
CC
21:31 : :3?
*2:44
' -C3
2
-
1145
4
CWS
2:45 ::47
2:5-?
3%13
3: Z*CIE-;':::40 #
37
]q�
-
Cff-ERATOR CHANGES-
*
-- TRIP
ENDS-
' '
-.=�C^-ta_-_C.. .-.-F.
::.�^---.
----•• .. .._-.--_-__--.-.
...-----
CC:--- THESE TRIPS OVERATE KEY
DISC:AYNE LOOP IN
CUUNTER-CLOCICWISE
DIRECTION
f�
s'
CWS-- THESE TRIPS OPERATE KEY
BISCAYNE LOOP IN
CLOCKWISE
DIRECTI0N
*****PREPARED BY
MDTA SCHEDULING***** METRO DADE TRANSIT AGENCY
METROBUS
18Z -•— ROI)TE': P
M.D.T.A. ROTARY
WAGE:
:
MIAM1—BOUND
WEEKDAY
DATE-
19APR?
fsan:S �seecmv=oeaas:ercaa�eassz=co ;-asaaas:ar.=z:es_-=:s==n=-_-••.-.•--_.•••—s:=ess:sszaoaeosssz=-xzn=c=�s:c=a-._==e====
CBD—ItEY BISCAYNE VIA S. BAYSHORE
TIME:
2:59 PM
�L'L"�Ca�Et��aaa::mxaazo�3__L'_G_3_.. C__C-. ��c7cC=S:tsC:c•-l•a-_'_O�_La--•---•••-___-...._C,-'--1=••S_-•••••-••-••__a..-_-.
—..._---
RUN
BLOCK
NOTE
D—H GAR —OUT WWDR 14RBF; CAPE MIAM—CI'<KL
SW1S GAR —IN D—H
TRIP
L—U
N06
NO.
FR—LINE CRAN HTHR PART: SEAQ S AT
LAVE FR—LINE
TIME
TIME
1149
o
CC
2159 3301 3214 :3 : 2F3
3 : 37
38
2
1147
6
CWS
3:16 3s18 3:30 3:44
3:53*CE-4:11 #
37
1144
10
CC
3:29 3:31 3:44 3:58
4:07
38
2
1148
7
CWS
3:46 3:48 4:00 4:14
4:23
37
2
1096
-----_--__—..----------------------------.._—_—_...---------•-----___—_—_---`_---------------------------_
B
CC
3:59 4:01 4:14 4:28
4s37
1150
11
CWS
4z16 4slS 4:313 4:44
4:53*CE-5:11 #
37
_
1149
9
CC
4-.Z9 4231 4:44 4:58
5s07
38
2
1041
12
CWS
4:46 4:48 5:00 5:14
5:23*CE-5:41 #
37
1144
10
CC
4:59 5e01 5:14 5:28
5:37
38
2
— 1148
7
CWS
5:16 5:18 5:30 5:44
5s53
37
2
1096
8
CC
-------------------
5:33 505 5:48 6:02
--------------------------
6:09*CE-6:27 #
36
1149
9
CWS
6:01 6:03 6:13 6:25
6: 32
31
2
1144
10
CC
6:19 6:Z1 6:3 6%44
6:51*CE-7:09 #
32
1148
7
CWS
6:40 6:4Z 6:52 T:04
7:ii
31
2
1149
9
CC
7:20 7:22 T:3:3 7:45
7:5Z*CE-8:10 #
32
1148
7
CWS
—
.� 8:00 0:02 8:1Z8:248:31*CE-5:49#31
— — ----_
— ___—_--_---_--_
—*
—
OPERATOR CHANGES
-- TRIP
ENDS—
CC--- THESE TRIPS OPERATE KEY
BISCAYNE LOOP IN
COUNTER —CLOCKWISE DIRECTION
CWS-- THESE TRIPS OPERATE KEY
BISCAYNE LOOP IN
CLOCKWISE
DIRECTION
*****PREPAKED
BY
MDTA
SCHEDULING*****
METRO DADE TRANSIT
AGENCY
METRODUS
1U2 -- ROUTEe. 0
M.D.T.A. ROTARY
PAGE:
Ic:EYBISC-00UND
WEEI;DAY
DATE: I9Af R98
CBD-VEY BISrAYNE VIA
S. 13AYSHORE
TIME: b%51 AM
RUN
BLOCK
NOTE
D-H
GAR -OUT SWIS BRKL MIAM CAPE
mnuR WWDR GAR -IN D-N TRIP
L-O
NO.
NO.
PR -LINE LAVE STAT SF_AG PARK
NTHR CRAM Fri -LINE
TIME
TIME
114Z
1
CWS
SET
CE-5s 32 5 s 51 5 :59 6 t i O 6:23
6 t 24
:33
10
1143
2
CC
SET
CE-5:4T 6:06 6s15 6:Z6
6:34 6t36
:30
13
1144
3
CWS
SET
CE-6:02 6:21 6:30 6:41 6:54
6:55
:s4
9
1145
4
CC
SET
CE-6:17 6:36 6:45 6:56
T:06 T:08
32
11
_
1146CWSSETCE_
-----
6s326:51T:U27 167
7-3U---------------39-------------------
--------
1147
6
--
CC
-
SET
- - ---- ------
CE-6:41 7:00 7:11 7:25
7:35 7:3T
37
1'
114Z
1
CWS
7:09 7:20 7:34 7s47
T:48
39
16
1143
2
CC
T:24 7:35 7:49
T:59 8:01
37
18
1144
3
CWS
7:39 7:50 8:04 13:17
8:18
39
15
1145
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.4
CC
T:54 8:05 Os19
8:2a 8:31
37
17
1146
5
CWS
8 t 09 8: Zrt 8 : 34 Px : 47
8: 40
39
15
1147
6
CC
8 : 24 S t 35 8:49
rA:59 9:01
:37
1$
114Z
1
CWS
ID: 39 8t50 9s04 9:1rj
•9:17
38
16
1143
2
CC
8:54 9:05 9:3.7
9:27 9:29
35
20
1145
4
CWS
9:24 9:35 9:47 9:bO
1000
36
18
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
114 7
6
CC
9 : 54 1005 W I T
1027 102`l
35
20
1143
2
CWS
1024 10:35 104T 1053
1100
36
18
1145
4
CC
`` 1054 1105 1i1T
1127 I129-
35
18
1147
6
CWS
1124 1135 1147 1158
1200
36
is
11-48
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
7
CC
SET
CE-1135 1154 120.5 1 Z� 17
1227 22'29
35
17
1145
4
CWS
1224 1235 1247 1258
1:00
3E
15
114T
6
CC
1254 1:05 1:17
1:27 1:29
_.15
1T
1148
7
CWS
1: 4 1:Pra 1:47 1:58
2:00
36
15
1096
0
CC
SET
CE-1: 20 1: 39 1: 50 2: 02
2 :12 2: 14
:35
17
Cn
1145
4
CWS
1:54 2:05 2:17 2 :28
2:30
:36
15
OPERATCJR CHANGES
* -- TRIP
ENDS
CC--- THESE TRIPS OPERATE
KEY BISCAYNE LWIP
IN
COUNTER -CLOCKWISE•-•
DIRECTION
CWS-- THESE TRIPS OFERATE KEY D I SCAYNE LOOP
IN CLOCKWISE
DIRECTION
SET-- FARE = $1.25 - PRESET
METER TO 1
qw
*****PNEPARtD BY
MD'fiA SCHEDULING+**4{** METRO L1ADE TRANSIT AGENCY
METRODUS
102 -- ROUTF_: G M.D.T.A. ROTARY
PAGE: 4
teaaamaaaertaaeamssasaaaaassa�naaa=ta=taaas=cnnannoaas=amcana=s
KEYOISC—LOUND WEEKDAY
DATE: 19APR S
_vaaar_n===aa=a===anaan=-nn=enaas�eteas===aa==c=
CPO-VEY BISCAYNE VIA S. DAYSHORE
TLMEt 2:09 PM
nUN L-LOCK NOTE
NO.
No.
D-11 GAR —OUT' uW13 DRI(L MIAM CAFE linOR—WWDR GAR IN D—H
TRIP
L—Ur—�—__—______
FR—LINE LAVE STAT SEAQ PART. HTHR CRAN FR-LINC
TIME
TIME
1147
9
CC
SET CE-1s50 2:09 2:20 2:32 2:42 Z.s44
35
15
1147'
6
CWS
Z:Z4 2:35 2t4'T Z:58 3:00
36
16
1144
10
CC
SET CE-2t20 2:39 2t50 3:03 3:11 3:13
34
16
1148
T
CWS
2:54 =3sO5 :3:10 3:29 3:3t
37
15
1096
$
CC
3:09 3:19 3332 3:40 3:42
— ------------------------------------------------
33
17
1150
11
CWS
SET CE-3:05 3:24 3:34 3:47 3t58 4:00
.36
16
1149
9
CC
3:39 3:49 4:02 4:10 4:I2
33
1T
1041
12
CWS
* FR--Ill 3:55 4:05 4:18 4sZ9 4:31
36
15
1144
10
CC
4:09 4:19 4:32 4:40 4:4Z
33
17
1149
---
T
—
CWS
--
4 : 25 4:35 4 : 48 4 : 59 5 : Ci 1
-- -- ----
36
15
CC.
4s39 ., -------.--------------------------------•----------------
4s495%02 E210 5312
33
21
1149
9
CWS
5:09 5:19 5:32 5:4? 5:45
36
16
1144
10
CC
5:39 5:49 6:0" 6:09 6:11
32
0
I L 48
T
CWS
5 : G5 6: 0Us' 6: 15 6 : Z.Ei 6: 27
32
13
1149
------------------------------------------
y
CC
6:34 6:43 6:53 0 U
1$
T—CWS_
-- ----
.� 7:13 T:2Z 7:;32 7:4•'----------------------31
7 44-----_--_—____=�1—===—_--___________
--
16------------------
---_=1148--
— _____-------_-•_______________ `_�
—C
OPERATOR HANGES
TRIP ENDS
CC--- THESE —TRIPS OPERATE KEY BISCAYNE LOOP IN
COUNTER—CLOCIt.W I SE DIRECTION
CWS-- THESE TRIPS OPERATE KEY BISCAYNE LOOP IN
CLOCKWISE
DIRECTION
SET-- FARE = $1.25 — PRESET METER TO 1
1
*****PREPARED BY
MDTA SCHEOULINV*****
METRO BADE'TRANSIT AGENCY
MET"OU-US
IOZ -- ROUTEt V
M.D.T.A. ROTARY
RAGE: 1
MIAMI-FOUND
SATURDAY
DATE: 19APA98
-..•_._...-aa__=aa-____m__cesnaaa=aa::czrznmo=aa=_aaxaa.:=x=m-saga==_cr.a=ea:zzaaaa=aa-naaaazasw=azr..
=a=r.a=a=asses_
CBD-I:EY BISCAYNE VIA S. DAYSHORE
TIME: 6o46 AM
-
-tests^z_-a=x=caa=a==wm=Car_==ae====s_;=_=a=======9:===w_==t.======a======
====to==aa====c===m=ft==========s
RUN
01.00<
NOTE
D •-11 GAR --OUT WWDR I IRCR CAPE
M I AM URKL
SW 1 S GAft •- I N D-11
TRIP
L. - O
NO.
NO.
FR-LINE GRAN HTHF FART:
SEAL,:TAT
1AVE FR-LINE
TIME
TIME
1547
1
CC
69-15 6:4T
6:58 T:10
T:IT
32
.:
1548
2
CW.,
7:ZT 7:Zf3
7::37 (:49
7:56
29
154T
I
CC
B:QZ 6:04
8:15 6:28
8:36
34
Z
1548
Z
CWS
8 : 45 8: 46
S s !`t5 9 : 08
7: 16
31
Z
1547
I
CC
9 : 19 9: Z1
9 s 3Z 9: 415
9: l53
34
Z
1548
2
CWS
14Q2 1003
1 U I tZ 1 C�2f3
__-___-_ ______________.-------------
1033 -
31
x
1547
1
CC
1040 1041
10,52 1105
1113
33
2
1548
2
cwal
112Z 1123
1132 1145
1153
31
.2
1f34T
1
CC
120c) 1201
1 r 13 12_2IFi
1233*r-F-1251 #
:33
1548
2
CWS
1240 1Z41
1253 1:4)5
1:13
3
2
1549
3
CC
I :20 1: 21
..---------------------------3-----------------------
1 s :3:3 1 : 46
1 r F3
3•
1540
2
CW5
2: OC► 2: 01
`: 13. 2 : Z5
Z ::33: CE 2 : 51 #
33
1549
3
CC
2:391 Z:40
Z:5Z 3:05
3:13
34
2
1550
4
CWS
3:2'Z 3:23
3:32_ 3:45
3:53
31
2
154
3
CC
3.15T 3: 5:�
4 : I : 4: Z5
4 : 33
36
Z
1550
4
CWS
" 4:4Z 4:43
—
4:!:52. 5:05
---__..___..___-3—_--`-----_-----•-___
5: 1
1
_— ,
1549
3
CC
5: 18 5: 20
51: 33 5:46
5: 54
36
2 0
1550
4
CWS
6 : 08 6 - G9
6: Iva 6: 27
6: 34
Z6
2
1549
3
CC
6:42 6:44
6:55 7:QT
7:14
32
1550
4
CWS
7 :'23 7: Z_9
7 ::36 7: 47
7 : 54
Z6
2
1549
:3
CC
-- _
7:55 7:67
8:eifi �::2e:1
_____________________________
Ft:27*CE-O:4F;41
32
..
1r50
4
CWS
13:34 -8:?5
8:41 :fi3
9:00*CE_-9:1.9 #
20,
OPERATOR CHANGES
TRIP
ENDS
CC--- THESE TRIPS CIPERAIC KEY
131SCAYNE LOOP IN
COUNTER—CLOCKWI-1: DIRECTION
CWS-- THESE TRIPS OPERATE: KEY
B I SCAYNE LUCK' IN
CLOCKWISE
DIRECTION
*****PREPAREb BY
MDTA SCHEDULtNe***** METRO
DADE TRANSIT AGENCY
METROPUS
102 -- ROUTE: 1.'.
M.D.T.A. ROTARY
PAGE:
2
KEYBI SC -SOUND
SATURDAY
DATE:
19APR913
�eY �`�#sSs'�'Cb'Y �'Z xatsea ar�mlaaraaaa>zwan=ass.:a==a==�aaa=____...—•---•'=—==o=====:=r. �... .--:.__
—
---
CDD-KEY BISCAYNE VIA S. BAYSHORE
TIME:
5:59 AM
a sea mrLtttcsaa=-nss=a=xx=a=feasts=x+sea-a=====a=a=====a_a=wee====seal==___===_=__=====
tza=
-
aa==aan_..___=etaan__-..___
- __..__
RUN
BLOCK
NOTE
D-F1 GAR -OUT SW1S BRKL M1AM CAPE HI;BR
WWDR GAR -IN D-H
TRIP
L-O
NO.
NO.
FR-LINE LAVE STAT SEAO PARK: HTHR
CRAN FR-LINE
TIME
'TIME
1647
1
CC
SET CE-5:40 5:59 6:05 6:1T 6:25
6:26
27
19
1548
2
CWS
SET CE-6:20 6:39 6:45 6:57 7:O?
7:10
31
17
1547
1
CC
7:19 7:25 7:37 7:46
7:46
27
16
1548
2
CWS
7:58 0305 8:17 8:29
3:30
32
15
154T
i
CC
8:39 8:45 8:57 9:00
9:09
31
10
154e
CWS
_. _
9:18 9:26 9:37 y;4y�
_______________�
c, .5,
---�___----------____-•
}
1
1547
1
CC
9:65 2005 1017 1027
1028
33
12
1649
2
CWS
1035 1046 1067 1106
1ioe
33
14
1547
1
CC
1115 1125 1137 1147
1148
33
12
1546
2
CW5
1156 I Z05 1217 1226
12'28
30
12
1549
3
CC
- ------------------------------------------------
SET CE-1216 1235 1245 1L57 1:06
1:07
32
13
1543
2
CWS
1:15 1:25 1:37 1:46
1:43
33
12
1549
3
CC
1:55 2:05 2:17 2:26
2:2T
32
12
1550
4
CWS
SET CE-2:16 2:35 2:45 2:57 3:06
3:08
33
14
1549
---------------__--
3
CC
3:15 3:25 3:35 3:43
3:44
29
13
1550
4
CWS
`-------__.---
3:55 4:05 4:15 4:24
-----_•-_------
�4:26
3f
_------------------•
16
1549
3
CC
4:35 4:45 4:65 5:03
5:04
29
14
j
1550
4
CWS
5:15 5:25 5:35 5:44
5:46
31
22
1549
i
CC
5:56 6:06 6:16 6:24
6:25
29
17
1550
4
CWS
6:36 6:45 6:55 7:03
7:05
29
23
1549
3
CC
--------------•-------------------------
7:16 7:26 7:35 7:43
7:44
20
-------------------
11
1550
4
CWS
7:56 3:05 8:15 6:23
8:25
29
9
P�
OPERA'f'rjR CHANGES *
-- TRIP
ENDS
CC--- THESE TRIPS OPERATE KEY
BISCAYNE LOOP IN
COUNTER -CLOCKWISE DIRECTION
CWS-- THESE TRIPS OPERATE I.EY
BISCAYNE LOOP IN
CLOCKWISE
DIRECTION
SET-- FARE = $1.25 - PRESET METER TO 1
*****PREPARED
BY
M07'A SCHEDULING*****
METRO DADE TRANSIT AGENCY
METRODUS
IOZ -- ROUTE: U
M.D.T.A. ROTARY
PAGE. 1
MIAMI-BOUND
SUNDAY
DATE: 19APR90
CBD-K.EY B I SCAYNE VIA
S . BAYSHORE
TIME:: 6 : 28 AM
nUN
BLOCK:
NOTE
D-" GAR -OUT WWDR HRBR CAPE M I AM
DR SW 1 S GAR -IN D-H TRIP
L-O
NO.
NO.
FR-LINE GRAN HTHR PARK SEAQ
S'fAT LAVE FR-LINE TIME
TIME
184 3
1
CG
6:28 6:30 6:40
c•:5Z 6:59
31
2
1843
1
CWS
8:05 8:06 8:15
8:28 0:36
31
2
1844
2
CC
8:43 8:45 8:55
9:03 9:16
33
2 _
I =343
1
CWS
9 : 22 9 : «. 9 ::
? : 45 9 : 5 3
31
2
1044
2
CC
9:58 1000 1012
1025 1033 `
35
2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1843
1
CWS
1042 1043 1► lUz
1 105 1113
31
2
1844
2
CC
1119 1120 ll_'::Z
1145 1153
34
2
1843
1
CWS
1200 12.01 1213
1ZZ5 1233
33
2
1844
2
CC
IZ40 1241 1253
1:05 1:13*CE-1:31 #
33
1843
1
CWS
1:20 1:21 1:33
1:45 1053*CE-2:11 #
33
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1045
J
cc
2 : 00 2 : 01 2313
2 : Z5 2 : 3'3
2.3
2
11346
4
CWS
2:3? 2:40 2:52
3:05 3:13
34
2
1345
3
CC
3:18 3:ZO 3::�2
3:45 3:53
35
2
1846
4
CWS
4 : 0 4:03 4:12
4:.'_5 4:33
31
2
1345
3
cc
4:33 4:40 4 : 5Z,
5:05 5:13
35
2
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1846
4
CW3
5:22 5:23 5:3Z
5:45 5:53
31
2
1845
3
CC
603 6:05 6:15
6: '7 6:34
31
2
1046
4
CWS
6:40 6:49 6:55
7:07 7:14
26
2
1045
3
CC
7 : 17 7 : 19 7 : a9
7 ; 1 i T % 43
:j l
2
1846
4
CWS
7:54 7:55 3:ill
8:13 8:20*CE-8:38 #
26
1845
3
CC
3:21 3%23 8:::I3
0:45 8:52*CE-9:10 #
:31
OPERATOR
-TRIPS -OPERATE
CHANGES CFIANGES--
TRIP
- --
ENDS
-
CC--- THESE KEY-BISCAYNE-LOOP IN
COUNTEf:-CLOCKW I SE
DIRECTION
CWS-- THESE TRIPS OPERATE V.EY BISCAYNE LOOP IN
CLOCKWISE
+
DIRECTION
�.. ..
► ..
,,. ....1 �y....•. �.. .. a t... .,,... ... :.;, way.. -I a .._...?
_
... .. ........
*****PREPARED
*****PREPARED DY MDTA
SCHEDULING*****,
METRO DADE TRANSIT
AGENCY
METROSUS
10Z -- ROUTE: G
M.D.T.A. ROTARY
PAGE: Z
KEYSISC-BOUND
SUNDAY
DATE: 19APR98
tt==_._==C:::==
l=== 0C_==
====
CBD-I:EY BISCAYNE VIA
S. BAYSHORE
TIME: 6:00 AM
RUN
[BLOCK
NOTE D-H
GAR -OUT SW 1 S DRKL MI AM CAPE
I INUR WWDR GAR -IN D-1.1 'TRIP
L-O
NO.
NO.
FR-LINE LAVE STAT SEAQ PARK
H•THR CRAN FR-LINE
TIME
TIME
184:3
1
CC SET
CE-5:41 6 z 00 6:05 6: 1 T
6 : 25 .6: 26
26
2
1843
1
CWS
T:01 7:07 7:19 7:32
7:33
32
32
1844
2
CC SET
CE—T:39 7:58 8:05 8:17
8:28 8:29
31
14
1843
1
CWS
8:38 8:45 8:57 9:10
9;11
33
11
1844
z
CC
9slS 9:25 9s37
9:43 9:49
31
9
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1843
1
CWS
9:55 1005 1017 1028
1030
35
12
1844
2
CC
1035 1045 1057
1107 1100
33
11
1043
1
CWS
1115 1125 113T 1148
1150
35
10
1844
2
CC
1155 1205 1Z17
1226 12Z7
3•
13
1843
1
CWS
1Z35 1245 1257 1:08
1:10
35
10
----------------------------------------------.-____---_____—___---_------------------------------------
1845
3
CC SET
CE-1266 1:15 1:25 1:37
1:46 1:47
32
13
1846.
4
CWS SET
CE-1; 36 1 : 55 2 : O 5 2 :17 2 : 28
2 :30
:35
9
1845
3
CC
2:35 2:45 2:57
3:06 3:07
32
11
1846
4
CWS
3:15 3:25 3:35 3:46
3:43
203
14
1845
:3
CC
3:55 4:05 4:15
4:Z3 4:24
Z9
14
------5--------------J.j---i�----------------
-----j846 ----_4_CWS----__- ----__4:35
4:45-4.55y5:06
:08
1845
3
CC
5 : 15 5: Z5 5: 35
6:43 5: 44
29
19
1846
4
CWS
5:55 6:05 6:15 6:25
6:27
32
21
1845
3
CC
6:36 6:45 6:55
7:03 7:04
28
13
1846
4
CWS
7:16 7:Z5 7:35 7:45
7:47
31
7
---------
-------C
-------------------
C
---- ----------
2:-
----------------�
t azle
:17
-----------------------
3
OPERATOR
CHANGES
* -- TRIP
ENDS
CC--- THESE TRIPS OPERATE
KEY BISCAYNE LOOP
IN
COUNTER —CLOCKWISE
DIRECTION
CWS-- THESE TRIPS OPERATE KEY BISCAYNE LOOP
IN CLOCKWISE
DIRECTION
SET-- FARE = $1.25 -- PRESET METER TO 1
*****PREPARED BY
MOTA SCHEhUI_ING*****
METRO DADE TRANSIT AGENCY
METR013US
12 --
ROUTE: 12
M.D.T.A.
ROTARY PAGE:
1
SOUTHBOUND
WEEKDAY
DATES
19APR93
atntcafeasae.sr.oarrrrrrrrrast=na=za;raaat============arias====a======a==aaa0s:rot=eaasaazzzan====M===*===--as
BUNCHE
PARK NORTHSIDE MERCY
CRDT
TIME:
5:10 AM
----xs>araszvzanamzeamasaaaaseaaaanr.rwan=aaeraax_=nc====m=====a==a:=even=ee:oaosaa======:=a======a==z=a====:
—
RUN
13LOCK NOTE
D—H CZAR —OUT HURT
ZTAV
71ST ALLA 9AVE
CIVC SIST
VIZ— MRCY GAR —IN 13—H TRIP L-0
N0.
N0.
Fit —LINE SIDE
79ST
IZAV DATA ITST
CNTR 12AV
CAYA
140SP FR—LINE
TIME TIME
1001
1
SET C:E-4s59 5s10
Us1Z
15:19 5:ZT 5:32
5236 5:42
5:49
5v55
45
to
1003
3
SET CE-5sZ6 5:37
5:39
5:46 P-5:54 6:00
6:05 6:11
6:19
6:28
51
7
1004
4
SET CE-5s51 6:OZ
6104
6:12 6.-Z4 6:30
6:35 6:41
6:49
6:58
56
3
1005
5
SET CE-6319 6:3O
6s3Z
6:40 6:5Z 7:00
7:06 T:14
7:ZZ
7:32
62
32
1002
2
6:56
6: FA
7:07 7:22 7:30
7:36 7:44
t:5Z
8:02
66
32
---------
1001
---------..----------
1
-----.....---
7:26
— ..
7:Ze
•
7:3T 7:52 8.00
• •
8:06 8e14
•
8:21
e
0:30
64
34
1003
3
7:57
7:59
8:08 8:23 8:30
8:36 8:44
3:51
9:00
63
34
1006
6
8:29
8:31
8:40 8:55 9:02
9:08 9:16
9:23
9:32
63
32
1004
4
9:01
9:03
9:12 9:26 9:33
9:39 9:47
9:54
1603
62
29
1005
5
9:31
9:33
9:42 9:56 1003
1009 1017
1024
1033
62
26
-----------------------------------------------
1002
2
1001
1003
— --
1012 1026 1033
1039 1047
1054
J103
62
26
1001
1
1031
1033
1042 1056 1103
1111 1121
1129
1138
6T
21
1003/1008
3
1102
1104
1113(1126)1133
1141 1161
1159
1208
66
21
1007
6
113Z
1134
1143 1156 1Z03
1211 12Z1
12.Z9
1233
66
21
1004
4
IZOZ
IZ04
IZ13 IZZ6 1Z33
--- —
1241 1251
1259
1s08
66
21
---------------------------
1005
5
------------------------
IZ3Z
IZ34
IZ43 IZ56 1:03
1:11 1:21
1:29
1:38
66
25
1002
Z
1:02
1:04
1:13 I:Z6 1:33
1:41 1:51
1:59
Z:08
66
P
1001/1009
1
1:31
1:33
1342(1:55)Z:03
2:11 2:Z1
Z:29
Z:38
67
2
1008
3
2:OI
Z:03
2:12 2:ZF5 2:33
Z141 2:51
2:59
3:03
67
24
1007
6
2:31
2:33
2:42 2:55 3:03
3:10 3:20
3:Z8
3:37
66
25
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1004/1011
4
3:00
3:02
3:11(3tZ4)3:32
3:39 3:49
3:57
4s06
66
26
104T
5
3:25
3:ZT
3:36 3:49 4:00
4307 4:15
4:Z3
4:32
67
29
1010
2
3:54
3:56
4:OG 4:19 4:30
4:37 4:45
4:53
5:02
63
28
j
1009
1
4:24
4:26
4:35 4:49 5:00
5:OT 5:15
5:Z3
5:3Z
68
28
1008
S.
4s57
4s59
5:08 5:22 5:30
5:37 5:45
5:53
6:02
65
28
{�
�cCs�G�C�aCao.:•aans����r:�a�n�aselr.ewr�rv=CGS=naC-va�t:a=�
=: -.��c�
:ca�ac.:e�
:GCCxit��l���p=�=
�-�C--=-cc�-�=�
:�:
-- OPERATOR CHANGES
* -- TRIP ENDS
L.
SET-- FARE _ $I.Z5 — PRESET METER TO 1
*****PREPARED BY
MDTA SCHEDULING***** METRO DADS TRANSIT AGENCY
METROSUS
12 -- ROUTE: 12 M.D.T.A. ROTARY PAGE:
2
SOUTHBOUND WEEKDAY DATE:
19APR?S
s�aaiaisaaasnszeassasa�as�esaa=aaaarno :am=aesaaanas;eama=asses :asaenaaaxnncaz-asset:atsaaasse=as aesazsasymz„saseeaa-
BUNCHE PARK NORTHSIDE MERCY CBOT TIMEt
5:28 PM
t�e�uaaaasasae=:asramnaecaaazrsaesssanaoa=aan=assssxzanaaaeaa.-_acsa=a..aamna_anr:aaeesaaaaatttsaaaas=eaaaa.=a.as-
RUN BLOCK. NOTE
D—H GAR —OUT NORT 27AV TIST ALLA 9AVE CIVC SIST VIZ— MRCY GAR -IN D-H TRIP L—O
NO. N0.
FR-LINE SIDE 79ST 12AV PATA 17ST CNTR IcAV CAYA HOSP FR-LINE
TIME TIME
1007 6
6128 5930 5439 6253 6901-6908 6tt6 6:24 6t33*CE-6t156 R
65
1011 4
6t01 6:03 6:il 6424 6a32 6t39 6t47 6:Z5 Ts04
63 1
1010 z
6:46 6:48 6:56 7:09 T:17 T:24 7:32 7:40 Ts49
63 3
1008 3
715Z 7:54 8:02 Sall 6:17 6:22 6:28 0:34 9s4Y*CE-9:04 #
49
1011 4
St45 8:4T 8:54 9103 9:09 9:14 9tZO 9:26 9t33
48 2
1010 2
_ ----------------------------------------------------
9s40 9:4Z 9:49 9:53 1004 1009 10115 10Z1 10Z8
46 2
1011 4
1036 1036 1045 1054 1100 1104 1110 1116 IIZ3
47 T
ansemnaaaasas-.n=a:aancs=aaae:ana.:tn=saacer..=s-aa: aaa_esaz;na.ca-sniar..===aae:zTssszasaeaansmnarnsseamaeema_
OPERATOR CHANGES +► -- TRIP ENDS
h�.
****-*PREPARED BY
MDTA SCHEDULING*****
METRO DADE TRANSIT
AGENCY
METROBUS
12 --
ROUTE:
12
M.D.T.A.
ROTARY PAGE:
3
NORTHBOUND
WEEKDAY
DATE:
19APR98
nnatasttasaac�xeaa==a..aaeaa=mcocaoaa3emas=nssssa-maaa=nc===saa=aasa=nn=aa=net9:n:nacncaraaaanss=oss.�:e=-
BUNCHE PARK
NORTHSIDE MERCY CBDT
TIME:
5:38 AM
a==xs=aa=�raa.aasaasaoar..r.....aacaaexsa==ter_=seas==ava==nn=oaaas==mesa-==�==�=nan==cnaacmacacaccn�c=assasa=
RUN
BLOCK NOTE
D—H GAR —OUT MRCY
VIZ—
SIST
CIVC
SAVE ALLA 71ST
27AV
MORT GAR —IN D—H TRIP L—O
NO.
NO.
FR—LINE HOSP
CAYA
IZAV
CNTR
17ST PATA 12AV
79ST
SIDE FR—LINE
TIME TIM,-
1OOZ
2
SET CE-5t13 5:38
5:46
5a53
5:59
6s05.6:12 6:24
6:34
6:36
58
20
1001
1
6:05
6:14
6:21
61Z9
6:35 6s4Z 6:54
T:04
7:06
61
1003
3
6:35
6t44
6:01
6:59
7t05 7113 7sZ6
7:36
Te38
63
1006
6
SET CE-6:38 T:03
7:13
7:ZZ
7x3o
7:36 7:44 7057
8:07
8t09
66
20
1004
4
7:32
7:42
7:51
7:59
8:06 8:14 8:ZT*8:37
8:39
67
ZZ
1005
5
8s04
8:13
8:21
8:29
8:36 8s44 8:57
9:07
---------------
9:0965
-
ZZ
1002
2
6:34
8:43
8:51
8:59
9:06 9:13 9:26
9:36
9:38
64
Z3
1001
1
9:04
9:13
9:21
9s29
9:36 9:43 9:56
1006
1008
64
23
1003
3
9t34
9:43
9:51
9:59
1006 1013 1026
1036
1038
64
24
1006l1007
6
1004
1013
1021
1029
1036 (1043) 1056
1106
1108
64
24
1004
4
1032
1041
1049
--- -----------------------------------------------
1057
1106 1114 11Z7
1137
1139
67
23
loos
5
1059
1109
1.117
1127
1136 1144 1157
1207
1209
70
23
1002
Z
1129
1139
1147
115T
1206 IZ14 1227
1237
1239
TO
23
tool
l
1159
IZ09
1217
1227
1236 1244 1257
1:07
1:09
70
22
1008
------------------------------------------------------
3
1229
1Z39
IZ47
1Z5T
1:06 1:14 1:27
1:37
1:39
TO
2G
1007
6
` 1Z59
1:09
1:17
l:ZT
-----------------------------------------------
1:36 1t44 1:57
Z.06
Z:10
Ta
2s
1004
4
1:Z9
1:39
1:47
1:57
Z:06 Z%13 7_:Z6
Z:3T
Zt39
70
2
1005/1047
5
2:03
2:13
2:Z1
2:29
2:36(Zt43)Z:56
3:07
3t09
#56
16
1o0211010
2
2:33
2:43
2:51
2:59
3:06(31.13)3:Z6
3:37
3:39
66
15
1009
1
3:01
3:12
3:21
3:29
3:36 3:43 3:56
4:OT
4:09
68
1C
1008
3
3:32
3:43
3:52
4:00
4:06 4:13 4:26
4:36
4:38 -- - ----
66
-
15
1007
6
4:OZ
4:13
4:Z2
4:30
4:36 4:43 4:56
5:06
5:OS
66
2C
1011
G7
4
4:32
4:43
4:52
5:00
5:06 5:13 5:25
5:35
5:37
65
24
104T
5
55:01
5912
5%22
5s.30
5:36 5:43 5:55
6:05
610T*CE-6:IT #
66
1010
2
5t30
5:41
5:51
5:59
6:05 6112 6:23
6:3t
6:33
63
1�
s�arvcaccaasaa-as.ta..es�anrtsam==.a��=cs=rea==ar_��vssaz==n==acaooa=sa...=__.:�=s=¢czcs-.=sa=sacce=cacsaaa=
OPERATOR CHANGES
-- TRIP ENDS
�.�.
SET-- FARE = $I.25
- PRESET METER TO 1
1. t .N
Sa mr.1
gC+WW+e'15"-'
*****PREPARED BY
MDTA SCHEDULING*****
METRO DADE TRANSIT
AGENCY
METROBUS
12 --
ROUTEZ 12
M.D.T.A.
ROTARV PAGEt
i
SOUTHBOUND
SATURDAY
DATE:
19APRPS
s�bsxrlltf9sssmass=ssetasaitasmt.Yaseas�cs=snaaesassc+ca:m=eces=-attcsacsaccscasa=xasnsteac=ae=oase7actaac=ssaceY
BUNC:HE PARK NORTNSIDE MERCY C*DDT
TIME:*
6:11 AM
zss:as:nassta=zacsasassma=sa=soae=ftasassscsc::sc=as:a=aen_a=c===ns:a==xaa-.sxsssa+zr=aassave=aaea==oxac==c=aa-a^asaas
RUN
BLOCK NOTE
D-N GAR -OUT NORT
2TAV
TIST ALLA 9AVE
CIVC
S1ST
VIZ-
MRCY GAR -IN D-H TRIP L-O
NO.
NO.
FR—L-INE SIDE
79ST
IZAV PATA 1TST
CNTR
12AV
GAYA
HOSP FR—LINE
TIME TIME
1503
3
SET CE-6s00 6tll
6:13
6:20 6t3O 6:35'6s39
6:44
6z49
6:55
44
4
1501
1
FR --- 21 6:41
6s43
6:50 TtOZ 7:08
Tt13
T:20
T:28
7:36
55
2'-d-
1504
4
FR---21 7:39
7:41
7:48 8:00 8:06
8:11
8:18
8:26
8:34
65
k
1503
3
8:35
8:37
8:44 8:56 9:03
9:08
9:16
9:25
9:34
59
23-
1501
_----_-_---..------------------------------------------------------------------------------:-_--___----
1
9:35
9:37
9:44 9:56 1003
1008
1016
1b25
1034
59
23
1504
4
1035
1037
1044 1056 1103
1108
1116
1125
1134
59
23
1503
3
1135
1137
1144 1156 1203
1208
1216
1225
1234
59
23
1501
1
1235
1237
1244 1256 1:03
1:08
1:16
1:25
1:34
59
23
1504/15ZI
4
1:35
1:37
1:44(1:56)2:03
2:08
2:16
2:25
2:34
59
23
1503/1509
3
2:35
2:37
2:44(2:56)3:03
3:03
3:16
3:25
3:34
59
23
----------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------
1508
1
3:35
3:3T
3:44 3:56 4:03
4:08
4:16
4:25
4:34
59
23
1521
4
4:35
4:37
4:44 4:56 5:03
5:08
5:16
5:25
5:34
59
23
1509
3
5:35
5:37
5:44 5:56 6t03
6:05
6:16
6:25
6:34
59
31
1508
1
6:37
6:39
6:46 6358 T:05
7sO9
T:15
T:22
7:29
52
36
150T
___-_1506___-_-L____------FR---21
5
FR---21 T:40
7:42
7:49 7:59 8:05
8:09
0:15
£3:22
8:29
49
8:50
8:52
8:59-9:09 9:15-9:19-9:25
9:32
9:39 -- r
----�-
1509
3
FR --- 21 100Z
1004
1011 1019 1024
1028
1033
1038
1044
42
br°`
1508
1
FR---21 1100
1102
1109 1117 1122
1126
1131
1136
1142*CE-1205 A
42
---
OPERATOR CHANGES
* -- TRIP ENDS
..=c=eac_a_=c-a_o__-=__c=s=
SET-- FARE = s1.25 — PRESET METER TO 1
c�n
TR:t: ���,��� S+,qy'{ tTj.�.�.'yhi h.� _ ,x �D4 .y�, 3�LY. � 4'�4tfLn-'..�j�7�
*****PREPARED DY
MDTA SCHEDULING*****
METRO DADE TRANSIT AGENCY
METRODUS
12 --
ROUTE: 12
M.D.T.A.
ROTARY PAGE:
2
NORTHBOUND
SATURDAY
DATES
19APR98
at idslammmmrsmiraaaemsamtsaeCaammaacraaasa�ssaaaasasmaac=ssaa==zaaazsxamsvaacs.^.as=sos.—.a-aa:=o=s:=nmra-=aanceax
BUNCHE PARK NORTHSIDE MERCY CBOT
TIME:
6s09 AM
�etamenam:stam>tzamsteaaascsasc9amsaaisaasms>r=>=asas-xasns=asanaoaaascoaaaaszsec=asset_sss—.aaaaazaaaaaa=aaaa=sa-:s=a-
RUN
BLOCK NOTE
D—H GAR —OUT MRCY
VIZ—
SiST CIVC
9AVE ALLA TIST
27AV
NORT BAR —IN D—H
TRIP L—O
NO.
NO.
FR—LINE HOSP
CAYA
12AV CNTR
17ST PATA 12AV
T9ST
SIDE FR—LINE
TIME TIME
1502
2
SET CE-5s44 6309
6s15
6:21 6s26
6:30•-6:36 6:44
6s5Z
6s54*TO --- 21
45
15
1503
3
6:59
Ts08
7s17 Ts24
7130 7:36 7:47
7:56
T:58
59
37_
1501
1
T:59
8308
8:1T Q:Z4
8:30 8:36 8:47
8:56
8:58
59
1504
4
8:5T
9:07
9s16 9:Z4
9:30 9s3T 9:49
9:59
1001
64
.=
1503
3
9:57
1007
1016 1024
1030 103T 1049
105V
1101
64
34
---------------------..__---------_------_—_--_-------_—_-------
1501
1
105T
110T
1116 11Z4
—_------------------_---__------------
1130 1137 1149
1157
1201
64
34
1504
4
1157
1207
1216 12Z4
1Z30 1Z37 1249
1259
1:01
64
34
1503
3
125T
1:07
is16 1sZ4
1:30 1s3T 1s49
1:59
2s01
64
34
1501 / 1508
1
1 : ".57
Z: O7
2 :16 Z a 24
2 s 30 (2 s 37) Z : 49
2 s 59
3 s 01
64
34
1521
4
2:57
3s07
3:16 3:Z4
3:30 3s37 3s49
3:59
4:01
64
34
-------------------------------------
1509
3
----------------------------------------------------------------
3:57
4:07
4:16 4sZ4
4:30 4:37 4s49
4:59
5:01
64
34
1508
1
4s5T
5:07
5:16 5sZ4
6:30 5:37 5:49
5:59
6:01
64
36
15Z1
4
5:5T
6:07
6:16 6:24
6:30 6:37 6s49
6:59
7:01*CE—Tsii #
64
1509
3
7:05
7si2
7:ZO 7:Z6
Ts30 7336 7:46
7:54
7:56*TO --- 21
51
14
1508
1
8:05
8:12
8:20 8:Z6
8:30 8:36 8:46
8:54
8:56*TO --- 21
51
25
----------------------------------------------------------------------:-------*
1507
5
9:05
9:12
9:ZO 9326
9:30 9:36 9:46
9.54
--
9s56 TO---21
51
2
1506
2
1010
1016
102Z 1027
1031 1037 1045
1053
1055*CE-1105 #
45
F?
1509
3
1110
1116
112Z i1ZT
1131 113T 1145
1153
1155*CE-1Z05 #
45
ma=�i'CSC=�'�-��-.�C==Ss=Ste'.-.�=�C:I�=J:SC.�S�Ca��==:
=L•=T.=C==��C=fix:.-..�Ss�.^�.-�==3�.:==s�f�L'-.�-.==O�=CC=�1=.^.ST=�==�_:
7ias
OPERATOR CHANGES
# -- TRIP ENDS
SET-- FARE _ $1.25 — PRESET METER TO i
1
i '�
**-***PREPARED
BY
MDTA SCHEDULING*****
METRO DADE TRANSIT AGENCY
METROBUS
12 --
ROUTE: 12
M.D.T.A.
ROTARY PAGE:
1
SOUTHBOUND
SUNDAY
DATES
19APRPS
ucno un==rasrsatx=t�=sax=sass=wxexaaaxn=xa===aa==xrnaxn===nsx=aa===a=o�=ncxxr=neaxrsxaaan=r====aexr==snare-
BUNCHE PAi2K NORTHSIDE MERCY
CBDT
TIMES
6111 AM
aatsaaa�estara=aaaae:asaxss►asrasssaatianaaaxxaaaasaeax=aacc===r_xx=xraaxaa=aa=sa:ar-sroxrxx-==ateaac==snsnsex==
RUN
BLOCK NOTE
D—H OAR —OUT
NORT
27AV
TIST ALLA
9AVE
CIVC
SIST
VIZ—
MRCY GAR —IN D—H
TRIP L—O
NO.
NO.
FR—LINE
SIDE
T9ST
1ZAV PATA
17ST
CNTR
1ZAV
CAYA
HOSP FR—LINE
TIME TIME
1803
3
SET CE-6:00
6:11
6i13
6%ZO 6230
6:35
6:37
6:44
6:49
6:55
44
6
1801
1
FR---Z1
6:41
6:43
6:50 T:02
T:08
T:12
7:19
T:26
T:33
52
28
1804
4
FR --- 21
7:39
T:41
T:48 8:00
8:06
8:10
8:lT
8:24
8:31
52
27
1603
3
8:35
8:3T
8s44 8:56
9:03
9sOT
+9:14
9:ZZ
9:30
55
2
1801
1
9:35
9:37
9:44 9:56
1003
100T
1014
102Z
1030
55
28
---- ---------------------------------------------__------
1804
4
1035
103T
1044 1056
1103
110T
1114
1122
1130
55
28
1803
3
1135
113T
1144 1156
103
120T
1Z14
1222
1Z30
55
L8
1801
1
IZ35
123T
1244 1256
1:03
1:07
1:14
1:22
1:30
55
28
1804
4
1:35
ls37
1:44 1:56
2:03
2sOT
2:14
2:2Z
2230
55
28
1803/1808
3
2:35
2:37
Z:44(2:56)3:03
—
3:07
3:14
3:22
3s30
55
z8
----- ---
_ — -------------------------------------
1
—
3:35
3:37
3s44 3:56
4303
4:07
4:14
4s2Z
4:30
55
28
1844
4
4:35
4:3T
4:44 4:56
5:03
5:OT
5:14
5:22
5:30
55
28
1808
3
5:35
5:37
5:44 5:56
6:03
6:07
6:14
6:22
6:30
55
36
1807
1
6:3T
6:39
6:46 6:58
7:05
7:09
7s15
T:ZZ
T%Z9
52
3T
1809
5
FR --- 21
T:40
7:42
7:49 T:59
8:05
8:09
8:15
8:ZZ
8:29
49
37
------------------------------------
1806
2
FW"—Z1
-----------------------------------------------------------------
8:50
8152
8:59 9:09
9:15
9:19
9:Z5
9:3Z
9139
49
31
1808
3
FR--- 21
1002
1004
1011 1019
10Z4
l0Z8
1033
1038
1044
42
2`�
1807
1
FR --- 21
1100
11OZ
1109 111T
1122
1126
1131
1136
1142*CE-1Z05 M
42
—
-- OPERATOR CHANGES
* -- TRIP ENDS
C SET-- FARE _ $1.25 — PRESET METER TO 1
�S Wean=-=ox=Was==ssn=xxsx=as=exrxaaa.cv===x=Daces=a===c===c-===s=-a..=c==cna=rs:eac===caz=-==s======-==s
C)
CD
• ... .."+. �:. ;. ;.�Jr s r-..�L}M .rx w:.,h?.. ." rt ,` .. #e. ��p'. ._ ,+Ji'. -_ y�,...,.� �.w 5+t �+� c'S'?..�-" - ;`�3•�"o.;j41iF J�,S; �LSi.-�
' i ;� s. � :��,t. ?yt� �ij..., S. �i* t�2 rl`r •:irr ti�;'�tt't {.2t.>., d
*****PREPARED
BY
MDTA SCHEDULING*****
METRO DADE tRANSIT AGENCY
METROBUS
12 --
ROUTES 1Z
M.D.T.A.
ROTARY PAGES
2
NORTHEOUND
SUNDAY
DATES
19APR98
etaraeamcss�ssamameaseacnmstaaiai*aiaiaae=csaaaa?
--a=sm=aona=-_asaa==sx=rcar_aae=as=aenna======x=x=======as==
PUNCIIE PARK NORTHSIDE MERCY CBDT
TIME:
6:09 AM
RUN
BLOCK NOTE
D--H GAR —OUT MRCY
VIZ—
S1ST
CIVC
?AVE ALLA TIST
2TAV
NORT OAR —IN D-14
TRIP L—O
NO.
NO.
FR—LINE HOSP
CAYA
1ZAV
CNTR
17ST PATA 12AV
79ST
SIDE FR—LINE
TIME TIME
1802
2
SET CE-5t44 6:09
6:15
6:Z1
6tZ6
6:30 6:36 6:44
6:52
6t54*TO --- 21
45
16
1803
3
7:01
T:09
T:18
7:24
T:30 T:36 7:46
7:54
T:56
55
1801
1
8:01
8:09
8:18
UZZ4
0:30 8:36 8:46
8:64
8:56
55
wp
1604
4
8:58
9:OT
9:16
9:24
9:30 9:3T 9:49
9:5.8
1000
62
1803
3
9:58
1007
1016
1024
1030 103T 1049
`1058
1100
62
35
-----------------------------------------------
1801
1
1058
1107
1116
1124
1130 113T 1149
1158
iZ00
62
33
1804
4
1158
IZ07
IZ16
IZZ4
1230 123T 1249
1258
1:00
6Z
35
1003
3
1258
t:07
1:16
1:24
1:30 1:3T 1:49
1:58
Z%O0
62
35
1801/180T
1
1:53
Z:OT
2:16
2:24
2:30(2:3T)2:49
Z:58
3:00
6Z
3!3
1804/1844
4
2t58
3:07
3:16
3:24
3:30(3:37)3s49
--
3:58
4:00
62
35
------------------------------------------------------
1808
3
3s58
4:OT
4t16
4tZ4
—
4:30 4s37 4:49
4t58
5s00
6Z
38
I80T
1
4:58
5:07
5s16
5t24
5:30 5t37 5s49
5:138
6s00
62
37
1844
4
0:58
6sOT
6:16
6:24
6t30 6=3T 6:49
6:58
7:00*CE—Tt10 1!
62
1808
3
T:06
T:13
T:20
T:26
7:30 7e36 Tt46
7:54
7:156*TO---21
50
14
1807
1
8:06
e:13
8:20
8:Z6
_
8:30 8:36 8:46
3054
8:56*TO --- 21
50
ZS
--
1809
--------------------------------
9:06
-------
9:13
9sZ0
9:Z6
9s3O 9s36 9:46
9:54
9s56 TO---21 '
50
Z9
1806
2
1010
1016
IOZZ
1027
1031 103T 104U
1053
1055*CE-1105 0
45
1808
3
1110
1116
1122
112T
1131 1137 1145
1153
1155*CE-1Z05 M
45
"
OPERATOR
CHANGES
TRIP ENDS
SET-- FARE = $1.25 — PRESET METER TO 1
1
K
I
m
H
t
ART —TAB
Arterial LOS Worksheets
.1
so- 061
ti
Existing 1998 PM Peak Period
.. .: {
I
ART -TAB Version 2.0
Arterial Level Of Service Volume Tables
Based on Chapter 11 of the 1994 Highway
j
Capacity Manual Update
} Florida Department of Transportation
1995
7Auoust
N—-_---
ROAD
—"'--
—� UMk"R_ECT f0►�O[�9
- -_.
NAME: Brickell Avenue
From: S. Miami Avenue
(Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes)
II 3-0769.13
mile
To: SE 13th Street
(PEAK """"" PEAK DIRECTION: SB
.Aer
Study Time Period: PM Peak
i Level of Service
LANES A B
Analysis Date: October 26, 1998
Number of Lanes:
2 N//4 450 C D
Tao
4
I PHV: 1960
User Notes: Existing Conditions
810
II 960
j 3 NIA 1,530 1,640
q 1.470 2,340 2,480
ji NIA
8401•
1,680;;
2,530
GTRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS
I; 1,960 3.120 3,310
TNM
h
I; (Inc' eTV1ic,es in exclusive
- -
K FACTOR:
tun lanes)
I I L07� Inters coon oar mtP
0.092 (0 Q6nge.—
D FACTOR: 0.560 (0.50. 1.00)
j Level of Service
PHF: 0.960 (0.70 - 1.00)
j ADJ. SATURATION FLOW RATE;
LANES A g
C D
j
'
1,950 (1400. 2000
16 TURNS FROM EXCLUSIVE LANES: )
12 0.
i� 2 N/A
4 NIA 800 1,310 1.440
I
E
900
I'ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
6 1,710
N/A 2,630 4.180 2,930
1,SOOi:
3,010i!
I. URBAN, TRANSITIONING, OR
4.430
j II 8 NIA 3,500 5.570 5,910
���"'
4,510h
I;
6,010
I,
RURAL AREA TYPE: T
p ARTERIAL CLASS. U (U. , or R)
2
�i A A
j (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes)
0. 2, or 3)
L FREE FLOW SPEED m h :
TOTAL LENGTH OF ARTERIAL 13 (40,35.30,25)
3-D7Sr823 IntersPctionc per mljp
I
li
I (mi).
MEDIANS /N )• y
I LANES q Level of Service
LEFT TURN BAYS y /N :
j 9 C 0
2 N/A 8,700
E j
IGNALIZATION CHARACTERISTICS
14,300
4 N/q 15,600
o 6 18,600 29,600 31,900
16,30011
NO. SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS: 4
ARRIVAL
N/A
II j 28,500 45,400 48.200
8 N/A 38,100 60,600 64,200
32,700
49 000�'
TYPE, PEAK DIRECTION: 4 (1,2,3,4,5 or 6)
TYPE SIGNAL SYSTEM:
I, i N/A means the level of service is not achievable
(Peak Hour Peak
65,400 ,
(P=Pretimed, S=Semiectuated, A=Actuoted)
SYSTEM CYCLE LENGTH
Direction Through/Right vlc Ratio for Full Hour
II sec
WEIGHTED THRU MOVEMENT (c 90 (60. 180)
Level of Se,_Ar
0.38 f0.20 - 0 80)
i LANES A B I:
h C D
i
_' 1 N/A 0.53
2 N/A 0.87 0.96
3 N/A 0.91 0.97
E li
1.001,1
0.58
II 0.93
�4 — N/A o sa � �� 0.98
1.00j1
1.001
0 @J
t
ART -TAB Version Z.0
Arterial Level of Service Volume Tables
,1
Based on Chapter 11 of the 1994 Highway Capacity Manual Update
Florida Department of Transportation
August 1995
DESCRIPTION
ROAD NAME: S. Miami Avenue
From: Brickell Avenue
To: SE 25h Street
PEAK >»»»»> PEAK DIRECTION: SS
Study Time Period: PM Peak
Analysis Dole: October 29, 1998
Number of Lanes: 4
PHV: 507
I User Notes: Existing Conditions
TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS
II Range--
K FACTOR: 0.092 (0.06 - 0.20)
D FACTOR: 0.560 (0.50 - 1.00)
ADJ. SATURATION FLOW RATE- : 1,950 (1 00 - 2000)
% TURNS FROM EXCLUSIVE LANES:
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
URBAN, TRANSITIONING, OR
I
RURAL AREA TYPE: U (U. T, or R) ARTERIAL CLASS: 2 (1, 2, or 3)
FREE FLOW SPEED 3
TOTAL LENGTH OF RTERIAL (,1): 2 (40,35,30,25)
p MEDIANS (Y/N): y h'
LEFT TURN BAYS /N :
IGNALIZA71ON CHARACTERISTICS
LARRIVALTYPE.
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS: 3 !
PEAK DIRECTION: 4 (1,2,3,4,5 or 6)
TYPE SIGNAL SYSTEM:S (P. S, or A)
(P=Pretlmed S=Semiacluafed A=Actuated)
YSTEM CYCLE LENGTH (sec): 90 (60-180)
HTED THRU MOVEMENT /C: 0.38 (0.20. 0 a0)
:j
(includes vehicles in exclusive turn /Ines)
li i; � lnter;iections �r mile �'
s
Level of Service
!i !! LANES q B
1 N/A N/A N/A D E
! 2 N/A N/A 410,
�I 3 N/A N/A NIA NIA N/A N/A 870I':
I 4 N/A N/A N/A N/A 1,3301
1,7701,
j: (Includes vehicles in exclusire turn /enes)
!� Ii 1@ Inte�sec�ns-ReLIDiIE
I Level of Service
I' LANES A B C
2 NIA 4 NIA NIA N/A
N/A N/A
D
NIA
N/A
6 NIA N/A NIA
8 N/A N/A NIA
N/A
N/A
(lnc/udes vehicles in exclusive
turn lanes)
].5 Interseetione .+e a.,
Level of Service
LANES A ® C
2 NIA NIA N/A
!' 4 N/A NIA NIA
D
N/A
6 N/A N/A NIA
8 N/A N/A N/A
N/A
NIA
N/A
I,
E
73011
1,54011
2,3701:
3,160!
E
8.000
16.800
25.800
34.400
Level of Service
LANES A
1 N/A
B C
N/A N/A
D E
N/A
2 N/A
3 N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A 0.50.1
4 N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
N/A 0.53
0.53•I
t��- )q)JL
Background 1999 PM Peak Period
Without Project
I
I
09- 261
f` ART -TAB Version 2.0
--
--- --
Arterial Level of
Service Volume Tables
Based on Chapter 11 of the 1994
Highway Capacity Manual Update
Florida Department of Transportation
A..ust 1995
[DESCRIPTION
i. KKR+3UR�E�KtsiltEC'rTOIIII XTM€==�
ROAD NAME: Briekell Avenue
(Includes vehicles in exclusive tum lanes)
From: S. Miami Avenue
�. 3.076 n �mw Qo----��s a
!+
To: SE 13111 Street
PEAK """>'» PEAK DIRECTION: SB
I Level of ServiceLANES
Study Time Period: PM Peak
A B C
D
E
Analysts Data October 26, 1998
I NIA 450 740
i' 2 N/A
810
840;
Number of Lanes: 4
� '! 960 1,530
3 N/A
1,640
1,68D �'
PHV: 2309
i User Notes: BACKGROUND 1999
j 1,470 2,340
4
I, N/A 1,960 3,120
_
2.480
3,310
2,530;i
3,370i;
'TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS
(includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes)
Range—
3.0769?-3 Illtgj5ection� r mil
i K FACTOR: 0.092 (0.06.0.20)
t D FACTOR: 0.560 (0,50 - 1.00)
I� ! Level of Service
(
777 PHF: 0.950 0.70 • 1.00)
ADJ. SATURATION FLOW RATE: 1,950 (1400 - 2000)
LANES A 8 C
I 2 N/A 800 1,310
i
D
1,440
E
1,500�'
% URNS FROM EXCLUSIVE LANES: 12 0. 100
q 4 N/A 1,710 2,730
2,930
3,010;
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
II 6 N/A 2,630 4.180
I 8 N/A 3,500 5,570
4,430
5.910
4,510
6,0101
!' URBAN, TRANSITIONING, OR
A
—
RURAL AREA TYPE: U (U, T, or R)
I I (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes)
i
HHN ARTERIAL CLASS: 2 (1, Z, or 3)
FREE FLOW SPEED (mph): 40
I 3 In�ec5eClions per mile
li
li
s (40,35,30,25)
TOTAL LENGTH OF ARTERIAL (mi): 1.3
i Level of Service
ll
I;
I MEDIANS (Y/Nyy
I LANES A g C
D
E
` LEFT TURN BAYS /N :
I'
I� i 2 N/A 8,700 14,300
4 N/A 18,600
15,600
16,300(
r•
�SIGNALIZATION CHARACTERISTICS
29.600
! 6 N/A 28.500 45,400
31.900
32,70011
,�
I I 8 N/A 38,100 60,600
II
48.200
64,200
49:0001
65,400 I
NO. SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS: q
I�
�!
ARRIVAL TYPE, PEAK DIRECTION: 4 (1,2,3,4,5 or 6)
TYPE SIGNAL SYSTEM:
NIA
I! pPeak Hour Peak Direction Througth/R ght v/c Ratio
S (P. S, or A)
for Full Hour
(P=Pretimed, S=Semiactualed, A=Actuated)
SYSTEM CYCLE LENGTH (sec): 90
1'
�I II Level of Service
11
11
(60. 180)
WEIGHTED THRU MOVEMENT g/C 0 38 (0.20 - 0.80)
B
LAA B C
1 I!
D
E
1 N/A 0.53 0.87
2 N/A 0.57 0.91
0.96
0.97
1.00'
i
3 N/A 0.58 0.93
is ....
0.98
1.001
1 pp
i
J
i
i
t
QP
! kKghlr x
h fA
us
C
i ART -TAB Version 2.0
Arterial Level of Service Volume Tables
Based on Chapter 11 of the 1994 Highway Capacity Manual Update
I! Florida Department of Transportation
August 1995
DESCRIPTION
From: Brickeli Avenue
11 ROAD NAME: S. Miami Avenue
To: SE 25h Street I
PEAK >»>»»» PEAK DIRECTION: SB
Study Time Period: PM Peak
Analysis Date: October 29, 1998
Number of Lanes: 4
PHV: 617
User Noles: BACKGROUND 1999 TRAFFIC
�I
TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS
i
—Range--
K FACTOR:
0.092 (0.06 - 0,20)
��
D FACTOR:
0.560 (0.50 -1.00)
PHF:
0.950 (0.70 -1.00) 1
ADJ. SATURATION FLOW RATE:
1,950 (1400.2000)
J!
% TURNS FROM EXCLUSIVE LANES:
12 0. 100
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
I!
URBAN, TRANSITIONING, OR
RURAL AREA TYPE:
11
U (U, T, or R)
ARTERIAL CLASS:
2 (1, 2, or 3)
FREE FLOW SPEED (mph):
35 (40,35,30,25) j
TOTAL LENGTH OF ARTERIAL (mi):
MEDIANS (YIN):y
0.2
LEFT TURN BAYS (YIN): y
IGNALIZATION CHARACTERISTICS
,
NO. SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS:
3
ARRIVAL TYPE, PEAK DIRECTION:
4 (1,2,3,4,5 or 6) I
TYPE SIGNAL SYSTEM:
S (P. S, or A)
(P=Prnlimed, S=Semiactuated, A=Actuated)
SYSTEM CYCLE LENGTH (sec):
90 (60. 180) II
WEIGHTED THRU MOVEMENT /C:
0.38 (0.20 - 0.80L _
PEAK HOUR PEAK Ia�arnM
—
(includes vehicles in exclusive tum lanes)
15 Intersection@ per mile
Level of Service
LANES
A B C
D
E
1
NIA NIA NIA
NIA
4101
2
NIA NIA N/A
NIA
8701;
j 3
NIA NIA N/A
NIA
1,330,
4
NIA N/A NIA
N/A
1,770'
OUR VOLUME J813711 DIRECTIONS)
�I
(Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes)
I
ii
15 Intersections per mile
i.
Level of Service
LANES
A B C
0
E
2
NIA NIA NIA
NIA
730
4
NIA NIA NIA
N/A
1,6401
6
NIA N/A N/A
NIA
2.370;
8
NIA NIA NIA
NIA
3,160
AVERAGE ANNUAL DAILY(
A
i
(Includes vehicles in exclusive
turn lanes)
15 )0terseL} oaLpA mile
Ij
Level of Service
l LANEs
A B C
D"
E (j
2
NIA NIA NIA
N/A
8,000'
I1 4
NIA NIA NIA
NIA
1680011
6
NIA NIA N/A
N/A
25:800
8
NIA NIA NIA
N/A
34,400'
IN/A means the level of service is not achievable
Peak Hour Peak Direction Through/Right v/c Ratio for Full Hour
Level of Service
LANEs
A S C
D
E
1
NIA NIA NIA
NIA
0.491
2
N/A NIA NIA
NIA
0.511
3
NIA N/A NIA
N/A
0.53
4
NIA NIA N/A
NIA
0.53I1
Total 1999 PM •Peak Period
With Project
1
005-
I
0
ART -TAB Version 2.0
H Arterial Level of Service Volume Tables
Based on Chapter 11 of the 1994 Highway Capacity Manual Update
Florida Department of Transportation
l p _ _Aupust 1995 p
DESCRIPTION
ROAD NAME: Brickell Avenue
From: S. Miami Avenue
To: SE 13th Street
»»»»» PEAK DIRECTION:SB
Study Time Period: PM Peak
Analysis Date: October 26, 1998
Number of Lanes: 4
PHV: 2360
User Notes: TOTAL 1999 VOLUMES
C CHARACTERISTICS
-dange-
K FACTOR:
0.092 (0.06.0.20)
D FACTOR:
0.560 (0.50 - 1,00)
PHF:
0,950 (0.70.1.00)
ADJ. SATURATION FLOW RATE:
1,950 (1400 - 2000)
)RNS FROM EXCLUSIVE LANES:
12 M - 1n01
DADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
URBAN, TRANSITIONING, OR
RURAL AREA TYPE:
U (U, T, or R)
ARTERIAL CLASS:
2 (1, 2, or 3)
FREE FLOW SPEED (mph):
40 (40.35,30,25)
TOTAL LENGTH OF ARTERIAL (mi):
1.3
MEDIANS (Y/N):y
LEFT TURN BAYS (YIN):y
3NALIZATION CHARACTERISTICS
NO. SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS:
4
ARRIVAL TYPE, PEAK DIRECTION:
4 (1,2,3,4,5 or 6)
TYPE SIGNAL SYSTEM:
S (P, S, or A)
(P=Pretimed, S=Semiectuated, A=Actuated)
SYSTEM CYCLE LENGTH (sec):
90 (60 - 180)
WEIGHTED T_HRU MOVEMENT o/C:
0.49 /n 20 - o en1
I;
PEAK HOUR PEAK DIREC N VOLUME
(Includes vehicles in exclusive turn
lanes)
i
3.0Z6.923 IOtetsBctions per mile
i
(
j
Level of Service
l LANES
A 8 C
D
E ;'
1
NIA 500 890
980
1,020!
2
NIA 1,030 1,840
1,980
2,0401
i 3
NIA 1,570 2,810
3,000
3,060'
j. 4
I
NIA 2,100 3,750
4,000
4,08011
(Includes vehicles In exclusive turn lanes)
Level of Service
b
LANES
A
B C
D
E I
2
N/A
890 1,590
1,740
1.8201;
4
N/A
1,840 3,280
3,540
3,640
6
N/A
2,810 5,020
5,350
5,46011
8
N/A
3,740 6,690
7,130
7,28011
(Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes)
3,076923 Intersections per mile
I
i I
Level of Service
LANES
A 8 C
D
E
2
NIA 9,700 17,300
18,900
19,800
4
N/A 20,000 35,700
38,500
39,600
6
I'
NIA 30,500 54,600
58,200
59,400
I Ij 8
NIA 40,700 72,700
77,500
79,100
l I N/A means the level of service is not achievable
Level of Service
LANES
A
B C D E
1
N/A
0.49 0.87 0.96 1.00
2
NIA
0.51 0.90 0.97 1.00
3
NIA
0.51 0.92 0.98 1.00
I
1
J
v4LY-.�.
ART -TAB Version 2.0
Arterial Level of Service Volume Tables
i Based on Chapter 11 of the 1994 Highway Capacity Manual Update
i;
Florida Department of Transportation
1 j! Auoust 1995
VOLUMEPEAK ROCIR PEAK DIREC71ON ;.
DESCRIPTION (Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes)
( ROAD NAME: S. Miami Avenue 1 II Intersedons OELO]IIO �;
I N From: Brickell Avenue
N To: SE 25h Street
PEAK »»»»» PEAK DIRECTION: SB
Study Time Period: PM Peak
LL Analysis Date: October 29, 1998
i; Number of Lanes: 4
PHV: 523
User Notes: TOTAL 1999 VOLUMES
i
!TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS
—Range—
K FACTOR: 0.092 (0:06 - 0.20)
I D FACTOR: 0.560 (0.50 - 1.00)
i PHF: 0.950 (0.70 - 1.00) i
r ADJ. SATURATION FLOW RATE: 1,950 (1400 - 2000)
h % TURNS FROM EXCLUSIVE LANES: 12 (0 -100)
[IROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
URBAN, TRANSITIONING. OR
RURAL AREA TYPE: U (U, T, or R) I
ARTERIAL CLASS: 2 (1, 2, or 3) i
FREE FLOW SPEED (mph): 35 (40.35,30,25)
TOTAL LENGTH OF ARTERIAL (ml): 0.2
MEDIANS (WN):y
I LEFT TURN BAYS /N :
i I
ISIGNALIZATION CHARACTERISTICS
NO. SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS: 3
ARRIVAL TYPE, PEAK DIRECTION: 4 (1,2,3,4,5 or 6) iI
TYPE SIGNAL SYSTEM: S (P, S, or A)
(P=Pretimed, S=Semiactuated, A=Actuated)
SYSTEM CYCLE LENGTH (set): 90 (60 -180)
WEIGHTED THRU MOVEMENT o/C: 0.38 (0.20 - 0.80)�j
ii
LANES
1
2
3
4
Level of Service
A B C
N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A NIA
N/A N/A NIA
NIA NIA N/A
D
NIA
NIA
N/A
N/A
E
410;.
8701:
1,330:,
1.770i-
FEAR
L
—
(Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes)
J.5 Intersections net mile
Level of Service
II
LANES
A B C
D
E
2
N/A N/A N/A
N/A
7301i
4
NIA NIA NIA
N/A
16401
6
NIA N/A NIA
NIA
2:37011
8
NIA N/A N/A
N/A
3116011
A Fy N U A L 0AI1rT W_1 (
(Includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes)
].5 Intersections oer mile
I'
u.
Level of Service
!
LANES
A B C
D
E
2
NIA NIA N/A
N/A
8,000
4
N/A N/A N/A
NIA
16.800
6
N/A N/A N/A
NIA
25.800
8
N/A NIA N/A
N/A
34.400
Level of Service
LANES
A
B C
D E
1
NIA
N/A N/A
N/A 0.49
2
N/A
N/A N/A
N/A 0.51
3
NIA
NIA N/A
N/A 0.53
r
A'A
11
Intersection LOS Worksheets
Rdsting 1998 PM Peak Period
I
r
I BRICKELL AVENUE 10/19/98
ICKELL AVENUE AND S. MIAMI AVENUE 13:51:07
EXISTING CONDITIONS • PM PEAK
SIGNAL94/TEAPAC1V1 LIM . Capacity Analysis Summary
Intersection Averages:
Degree of Saturation (v/c) .70 Vehicle Delay 33.6 Level of Service D
.................................................
Sq 51 1 Phese 1 Q Phase 2 1 Phase 3 1 Phase 4 1
'�,►/�'................... .............................
1 +o Q+++o Q++ Q o 1
1 + ++++Q + + + ++++1 + + q ++++q
AD 1 +¢ 1s+ + +¢ 1�+ + Q L++++q
1 1 1 v q v 1 1
• 1 1 1 1 0 1 1
? North 1 @+ Q q a+ + +¢i++++¢ Q
1 Q+++.+ + Q q + + + 1++++ q
+ 1 v+ Q 1+++1 v 1
-------------------------------------------------
q G/C- .056 1 G/C= .222 1 G/C= .244 1 G/C= .278 1
1 G= 5.0" 1 G= 20.00 1 G= 22.00 1 G= 25.0" 1
1 Y+R= 3.0" 1 Y+R= 3.00 1 Y+R= 6.09 1 Y+R= 6.0" 1
1 OFF= 6.7% 1 OFF=15.6% 1 OFF=41.1X 1 OFF=72.2X 1
is -=-^
C= 90 see G= 72.0 sec = 80.0% Y=18.0 sec = 20.0% Ped= .0 sec = .0%
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 Lane 1Width/1 g/C 1 Service Rate1 Adj q 1 HCM 1 L 190% Maxi
1 Group 1 Lanesl Reqd Used 1 aC (vph) laE 1Volumel v/c 1 Delay 1 S 1 Queue 1
•.------------------------------- ------------------------------
N Approach 13.2 8
1 7H+RT1 24/2 1 .266 1 .533 1 1913 1 1982 1 730 1 .368 1 9.3 1 8+1 215 fti
1 LT 1 24/2 1 .224 1 .311 1 893 1 1101 1 491 1 .446 1 19.0 1 C+1 214 fti
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
s S Approach 25.0 D+
1 TH+RTq 24/2 1 .284 1 .278 1 788 1 1034 1 818 1 .791 1 25.8 1 D+1 374 ft1
1 LT 1 12/1 1 .017 1 .056 1 146 q 195 1 82 1 .410 1 16.7 1 C+1 69 fti
E Approach 17.8 C+
---------------------------------------------
1 RT 1 12/1 i .236 1 .656 i 997 q 1038 1 220 1 .212 1 4.7 1 A 1 96 ftq
1 TH 1 24/2 1 .275 q .311 q 945 1 1159 1 774 1 .668 q 21.5 1 C 1 337 ft1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
pproacn
- 0.6 F
-----------------------------------------
1 RT 1 12/1 1 .159 1 .400 1 528 1 633 1 49 1 .077 1 12.7 1 8 1 37 ft1
1 TH 1 24/2 1 .381 1 .311 1 945 1 1159 1 1262 11.089 1 72.8 1 F 1 550 ftq
J
40 - 0 01
ar -
a
01 BRICKELL AVENUE
ICKELL AVENUE AND SE 26TH RD
EXISTING CONDITIONS - PM PEAK
SIGNAL94/TEAPACtV1 1.1.43 - Capacity Analysis Summary
10/19/98
13:53:31
Intersection Averages:
Degree of Saturation (v/c) .71 Vehicle Delay 28.9@ Level of Service D+
2 expect more delay due to extreme v/c's (see EVALUATE)
-------------------------------*-----------------
Sq 23 1 Phase 1 1 Phase 2 1 Phase 3 1 Phase 4 1
♦w/** .................................................
q+++
1++ 1
q
1+++
1++
/1®
q.+ + +c
1a+ + 1
9 a++++i
1
1 v
1 v i o
1 0++++1
1
1
1 0 1++++
1++++ v 1
North
1
1 + + +¢1++++C
6
1++++a 9
1
-------------------------------------------------
1 ++*9
9 1
i G/C= .156
i G/C= .200 i G/C=
.067 1 G/C= .369 1
1 G= 14.0f
1 G= MOM 1 G=
6.0" 1 G= 35.01 1
1 Y+R= 3.00
1 Y+R= 6.00 1 Y+R= 3.0° 1 Y+R= 5.0" 1
1 OFF=87.8%
1 OFF= 6.7% 1 OFF=33.3% 1 OFF=43.3Y. 1
--------- -----------------------------
--- -----
C= 90 sec
G= 73.0 sec = 81.1X
Y=17,0 sec = 18.9X Ped= .0 sec = .OX
1 Lane iWidth/1 9/C 1 Service Rate1 Adj 1 1 HCM 1 L 190% Maxi
1 Group 1 Lanesi Reqd Used 1 @C (vph) aE 1Volumel v/c 1 Delay 1 S 1 Queue 1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
N Approach 20.5 C
1 TH+RT1 24/2 1 .385 1 .422 1 1437 1 1568 1 1273 1 .812 1 19.8 1 C+1 465 ft1
1 LT 1 24/2 1 .17.0 1 .156 1 86 1 551 1 187 1 .339 1 25.9 1 D+1 100 ft1
Ir
t S Approach 65.1@ F
1 RT 1 12/1 1 .298 1 .233 1 216 1 366 1 338 1 .916 1 44.8 1 E+1 328 fti
1LT+TH 1 24/2 1 .357 1 .233 1 374 1 597 1 763 11.278 1 74.1a1 F 1 370 ft1
...............................
E Approach 14.4 8
- - ---------------------
1LT+TH 1 24/2 1 .247 1 .411 1 1275 1 1410 1 581 1 .412 1 14.4 1 B 1 216 ft1
---------------------------------------------------- ......................
W Approach 12.1 B
TH 1 48/4 1 .206 1 .511 1 3751 1 3808 1 909 1 .239 1 9.3 1 B+1-141 ft1
1 LT 1 12/1 1 .062 1 .067 1 249 1 295 1 241 9 .817 q 22.4 1 c 1 149 ft1
2101 BRICKELL AVENUE 10/20/98
TCKELL AVENUE AND BRICKELL TOWNHOUSE 11:11:40
ISTING CONDITIONS - PM PEAK
SIGNAL94/TEAPACIVI 1.1.41 - Capacity Analysis Summary
Intersection Averages:
Degree of Saturation (v/c) -.58 Vehicle Delay 10.8 Level of Service B
Sq 27 i Phase 1 q Phase 2 q Phase 3 q Phase 4 q
er/•r -------------------------------------------------
+ + q ++ q a q q
q + + q + + q ++++q q
/qm q + +a q + +e q q q
q q v q v q ++++q o q
q q q o q v q++++ q
North q q �+ + +¢q q q
v 9
q G/C= .056 q G/C= .511 q G/C= .100 q G/C= .122 q
q G= 5.01 q G= 46.00 q G= 9.0" q G= 11.01
q Y+R= 3.00 q Y+R= 5.01 q Y+R= 6.09 q Y+R= 5.0r q
q OFF=34.4% i OFF=43.3% q OFF= .0% ' OFF=16.7% q
C= 90 sec G= 71.0 see = 78.9% Y=19.0 sec = 21.1% Ped= .0 sec = .0%
q Lane gWidth/q g/C q Service Rater Adj i i HCM q L 190% Maxi
q Group q Lanesq Reqd Used q aC (vph) aE gVolumeq v/c q Delay q S q Queue q
------------•------------------------------------------------------------------
N Approach 8.5 B+
q TH q 24/2 i .434 q .622 q 2294 q 2318 1 1493 q .644 q 8.6 q 8+1 357 ftq
q LT q 12/1 q .000 q .056 q 152 q 183 q 44 q .238 q 6.6 q B+q 25 ftq
S Approach 10.5 B
q TH+RTq 24/2 q .330 q .533 q 1892 q 1961 q 1018 1 .519 i 10.5 q B q 300 ftq
q LT q 12/1 q .155 q .533 q 61 q 80 q 11 q .125 q 8.0 q B+q 25 ftq
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
E Approach 29.0 0+
ILT+TH+RTq 12/1 q .179 q .133 q 1 q 158 q 82 q .474 q 29.0 1 D+i 90 ftq
-----------------------•--.....-----.....--------•--•--------------•------.....
W Approach 32.5 0
0.TH+RTq 12/1 q .201 q .144 q 1 Q 147 q 101 q .623 i 32.5 q D q 109 fti
........................ ...........................•--•------ ---
.09- C01
;r t
01 BRICKELL AVENUE
ICKELL AVENUE AND SE 15TH RD
EXISTING CONDITIONS - PM PEAK
1
10/19/98
13:55:27
SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1.41 - Capacity Analysis Summary
Intersection Averages:
Degree of Saturation (v/c) .48 Vehicle Delay 9.3 Level of Service 8+
I
i
Sq 11 1 Phase 1 Q Phase 2 1
rt/�* .........................
q+++ q o q
v 9 0 ++++q
q q o q+++•+ v q
North Q S+ + +aq++++a q
s q q + + + q++++ q
q +++q v q
-------------------------
q G/C= .713 q G/C= .200 1
Q G= 82.0" 1 G= 23.09 1
Q Y+R= 5.01 Q Y+R= 5.01 Q
1 Q OFF= .0% Q OFF=75.7% Q
C=115 sec G=105.0 sec = 91.3% Y=10.0 sec = 8.7% Ped= .0 sec = .0%
1 Lane QWidth/1 g/C 1 Service RateQ Adj 1 1 HCM Q L 190% Maxi
1 Group 1 Lanesl Reqd Used 1 @C (vph) aE QVolumei v/c 1 Delay Q S Q Queue Q
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
N Approach 5.8 B+
1LT+TH+RT1 24/2 1 .482 1 .730 Q 2379 Q 2388 1 1394 Q .584 Q 5.8 1 8+1 304 ftQ
-------------------------------
P S Approach 4.3 A '
1
1 TH+RTQ 24/2 1 .318 1 .730 1 2674 Q 2675 1 636 1 .238 1 3.9 Q A 1 139 ftQ
1 LT 1 12/1 1 .588 1 .730 1 81 1 99 1 57 1 .543 1 9.5 1 B+Q 25 ftQ
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
E Approach 29.0 D+
1LT+TH+RTQ 24/2 1 .273 1 .217 1 1 1 496 1 170 1 .336 1 29.0 Q D+q 108 ftQ
...................... ------------------------------------------
W Approach 34.3 D
-- ---------------------------------
"_-TH+RTQ 12/1 Q .306 Q .217 1 1 1 294 1 201 1 .646 9 34.3 1 D Q 254 ft1
0
01 BRICKELL AVENUE 10/19/98
RICKELL AVENUE AND SE 13TH AD 13:57:23
r
EXISTING CONDITIONS - PM PEAK
SIGNAL94/TEAPAC(V1 0.43 - Capacity Analysis Summary
Intersection Averages:
Degree of saturation (v/c) .43 Vehicle Delay 17.1 Level of Service C+
sq 17
.....................................
1 Phase
1 1
Phase 2 1 Phase 3
1
rw/R*
.................................••..
q+++
1
0 1+
q
q + + +
1
++++1 +
q
e +++qs+
q
q
q v
1
++++1 0
1
1
1 e
1
v loom+
1
North
+
1
+s1
+Qq++++c
q
J
q
a+
q + +
+ 1
+ loom+
q
.....................................
G/C= .600 1 G/C= .139 q G/C= .130 1
1 G= 69.0" 1 G= 16.0" 1 G= 15.0" 1
1 Y+R= 5.0" 1 Y+R= 5.09 1 Y+R= 5.01 1
OFF=......87.0X_1-O......3X-1-O..6X 1
....
C=115 sec G=100.0 see = 87.0% Y=15.0 see = 13.0% Ped= .0 sec = .0%
' --------------------------- I ------ -..__-._-_.-----------------------
t
1 Lane gWidth/1 g/C 1 Service Rateq Ad) q 1
-----------
HCM i L 190% Maxi
1 Group 1 Lanesl Reqd Used 1 DC (vph) aE 1Volumel v/c q
••----•--------------------------•--•------•----------------•----•------------
Delay Q S 1 Queue 1
N Approach
7.2 B+
1 AT 1 1211 1 .356 1 .791 1 1234 1 1253 1 355 1 .283 1
2.5 l A 1 120 ftq
! 1 TO 24/2 1 .372 1 .617 1 2227 1 2300 1 1007 1 .436 1
8.9 1 6+1 311 ft1
q LT q 12/1 1 .284 1 .617 1 222 1 271 1 38 1 .140 1
7.0 1 8+1 25 ft1
f
S Approach
14.2 8
i AT q 12/1 1 .251 q .800 1 1251 1 1267 1 30 q .024 1
1.8 1 A 1 25 ft1
q TO 1 24/2 1 .315 q .617 1 2227 q 2300 1 624 1 .271 1
7.7 1 B+q 193 ftl
1 LT 1 12/1 1 .722 1 .617 1 82 1 105 1 103 1 .920 1
------•-------•----------------------------------------------------------------
57.4 q E 1 64 ft1
E Approach 38.0 D
1 AT 1 12/1 1 .255 1 .157 1 1 1 226 1 48 1 .194 1 32.1 1 D+l 65 ft1
TO 1 12/1 1 .292 1 .157 1 1 1 270 1 215 1 .736 1 41.5 1 E+q 293 ft1
Jr LT 1 12/1 1 .270 1 .157 1 1 1 255 1 118 1 .426 1 34.0 1 D 1 161 ft1
m
i R
1 BRICKELL AVENUE 10/19/98
ICKELL AVENUE AND SE 13TH RD 13:57:24
EXISTING CONDITIONS - PM PEAK
t SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 1.1,43 - Capacity Analysis Sumary (cunt.)
i
q Lane gWidth/i g/C q Service Ratei Ad! q q HCM q L 190% Maxi
q Group i Lanesq Reqd Used q OC (vph) aE QVoluneq v/c i Detay q S q Queue i
.................... ...........................................................
3
.j N Approach 40.0 D
-------------------
1 RT q 12/1 q .267 q .148 q 1 q 211 q 93 q .397 q 34.3 q D q 128 ftq
q TH q 12/1 q .256 q .148 q 1 q 252 q 61 q .222 q 32.9 q D i 84 ftq
q LT q 12/1 1 .292 q .148 q 1 q 239 q 202 q .771 q 44.7 Q E*q 278 fti
I
i
a
101 BRICKELL AVENUE 10/20/98
MIAMI AVENUE AND SE 26TH RD 10:17:43
%ISTING CONDITIONS - PM PEAK
SIGNAL94/TEAPAC(V1 1.1.43 - Capacity Analysis Summary
Intersection Averages:
Degree of Saturation (v/c) .55 Vehicle Delay 28.1 Level of Service D+
.................................................
•'Sq 44 Q Phase 1 i Phase 2 Q Phase 3 Q Phase 4 1
*r/f:.................................................
Q + 9 ++ Q 1 9
i + q ++ Q 9 Q
/q® q +e q + +¢ q q ++++q
Q 9 Q v i a ++++1 0 ++++q
q q q o q++++ v q++++ v Q
North 1 a+ q e+ + q q++++¢ 1
Q Q + Q ++ Q Q Q
i 1 + q ++ Q Q Q
q G/C= .167 q G/C= .211 1 G/C= .122 q G/C= .311 1
"3 Q G= 15.0" i G= 19.0" 1 G= 11.0" i G= 28.0" 1
i Y+R= 3.0" Q Y+R= 6.0" Q Y+R= 3.0" i Y+R= 5.0" Q
i OFF=90.0% i OFF=10.0% Q OFF=37.8% Q OFF=53.3% 1
.................................................
Cz 90 see G= 73.0 see = 81.1% Y=17.0 see = 18.9% Ped= .0 see = .0%
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Q Lane Quidth/Q g/C i Service Rate1 Adj i Q HCM Q L 190% Maxi
Q Group Q LanesQ Reqd Used q X (vph) aE gVolumel v/c i Delay Q S Q Oueue Q
...~--------------------------------------------------------------------------
H Approach
20.6 C
i TH Q 24/2 1 .199 1 .244 Q 627 1
911 1
385 1 .423 Q
22.0 1 C Q 184 ftq
Q LT Q 12/1 1 .000 Q .167 Q 463 1
----•----------------------------------------
533 1
57 1 .107 1
---------------------------------
11.0 Q B 1 40 ftQ
S Approach
48.5 E+
1 i TH 1 24/2 1 .173 1 .244 1 627 1
911 1
224 q .246 1
20.8 q C 1 107 ft1
i LT 1 12/1 1 .211 1 .167 1 383 1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
444 1
464 11.045 Q
61.8 q F q 312 ftQ
E Approach
21.1 C
7 TH i 12/1 1 .177 1 .333 1 486 1
621 1
117 1 .188 1
16.2 1 C+q 99 ft1
9 LT i 12/1 1 .118 1 .122 1 295 1
--------------------------------------------
342 1
--------------------------
287 Q .839 1
23.0 1 C 1 186 ftQ
---------
- Approach
17.2 C+
! TH i 36/3 1 .210 1 .333 1 1629 1 1863 1
701 1 .376 1
17.4 1 C+q 197 ft1
1 LT q 12/1 1 .000 1 .122 1 545 1
617 1
20 1 .032 1
9.1 Q B+Q 25 ft1
19
I
BRICKELL AVENUE
iAMI AVENUE AND SE 25TH RD
EXISTING CONDITIONS - PM PEAK
10/19/98
13:47:54
SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1.43 - Capacity Analysis SuiTmary
,intersection Averages:
Degree of Saturation (v/c) .31 Vehicle Detay 9.8 Level of Service B+
.........................
Sq 11 1 Phase 1 q Phase 2 q
''*►/ee
q + + + q ++++q '
++++q
q q v q o ++++q
q q o q++++ v q
TNorth q �+ + +aq++++e q
q q + + + q++++ q
q +++q v q
-------------------------
I G/C= .700 1 G/C= .189 q
i G= 63.0^ 1 G= 17.0" q
i Y+R= 5.0r q Y+R= 5.Off q
q OFF=93.3% q OFF=68.9X 1
-------------------------
Cu 90 sec G= 80.0 sec = 88.9% Y=10.0 sec = 11.1% Ped= .0 sec = .0%
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
q Lane gWidth/1 g/C q Service Rateq Adj i 1 HCM q L 190% Maxi
1 Group q Lanesq Reqd Used I @C (vph) @E iVolumeq v/c 1 Delay i S q Queue q
---------------------------------- --------------------------------------------
N Approach 3.2 A
- ------------------------
1LT+TH+RTq 24/2 1 .240 i .722 i 2456 i 2456 1 547 1 .223 i 3.2 1 A i 96 ftq
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
S Approach 3.1 A '
iLT+TH+RTq 24/2 1 .230 q .722 1 1677 i 1686 1 325 q .193 i 3.1 q A q 57 fti
................................. ---------------------------------------------
E Approach 26.9 D+
S TH+RTq 12/1 i .230 q .211 i 205 q 386 1 248 1 .638 i 27.0 i D+q-247 ftl
9 LT q 1211 q .147 1 .211 1 169 1 323 1 6 1 .018 1 21.4 i C 1 25 fti
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
W Approach
24.2 C
__-
TH+RTq 1211 q .156 1 .211 i 195 1 368 1 45 1 .121 i 21.8 1 C 145fti
PLT 1 12/1 q .221 1 .211 1 50 q 102 1 55 1 .478 q 26.1 1 D+q 55 ftq
---------------------------------------------------- ----------- --
t
Background 1999 PM Peak Period
Without Project
I
KI
S9- 561
W
q Lane luidth/1 9/C 1 Service Rateq Adj q 1 HCM q L 190% Maxi
1 Group q Lanesq Reqd Used 1 @C (vph) SE 1Volumeq v/e q Delay q S q Queue 1
• ------------------- -------------------------------
N Approach 13.7 B
1 TH+RTq 24/2 1 .297 1 .533 1 1914 1 1983 1 876 1 .442 1 9.9 1 8+q 259 ftq
1 LT 1 24/2 1 .239 1 .311 1 893 1 1101 1 563 1 .511 1 19.6 1 C+q 245 ft1
f
S Approach 36.9 D
------------ --------------------------------
1 TH+RTq 24/2 1 .322 1 .278 1 788 1 1034 1 994 q .961 1 38.6 1 D 1 454 ftq
1 LT 1 12/1 1 .030 1 .056 1 131 1 175 1 89 1 .492 1 17.7 1 C+1 75 ftq
F
E Approach 17.1 C+
4 RT 1 12/1 1 .257 1 .656 1 997 1 1038 1 261 1 .251 1 4.9 1 A 1 114 ft1
1 TH 1 24/2 q .271 1 .311 1 945 1 1159 1 755 1 .651 1 21.3 1 C 1 329 ftq
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
pproach 80.2a F
i RT 1 12/1 1 .159 1 .400 1 528 1 633 1 50 1 .079 1 12.7 q e q 38 ft1
1 TH 1 24/2 1 .387 1 .311 1 945 1 1159 1 1288 11.111 1 82.8@1 F 1 561 ftq
I BRICKELL AVENUE
ICKELL AVENUE AND SE 26TH RD
BACKGROUND 1999 TRAFFIC - PM PEAK
SIGNAL94/TEAPACEVI L1.43 - Capacity Analysis Summary
10/26/98
08:43:36
Intersection Averages:
Degree of Saturation (v/c) .92 Vehicle Delay 40.351 Level of service E+
B expect more delay due to extreme v/c's (see EVALUATE)
Sq 23 1 Phase 1 1 Phase 2 1 Phase 3 1 Phase 4 1
.................................................
1+++ 1++ 1 1 1
++
1a+ + 1 1 a++++1
1 1 v 1 V 1 0 1 0 ++++1
q q q o 1++++ 1**++ v 1
North 1 1 �+ + +c1++++¢ 1++++C 1
1 1 1 +++9 1 1
1 1 +++1 1 i
-------------------------------------------------
1 G/Cs .156 1 G/C= .200 1 G/C= .067 1 G/C= .389 1
1 G= 14.01 9 G= 18.00 1 G= 6.00 1 G= 35.06 1
1 Y+R= 3.0" 1 Y+R= 6.0" 1 Y+R= 3.00 1 Y+R= 5.0° 1
1 OFF=87.8% 1 OFF= 6.7% 1 OFF=33.3% 1 OFF=43.3% i
C= 90 sec G= 73.0 sec = 81.1% Y=17.0 sec = 18.9% Ped= .0 sec = .0%
1 Lane 1Width/1 g/C 1 Service Ratel Adj 1 1 HCM 1 L 190% Maxi
i Group 1 Lanesl Reqd Used 1 SIC Cvph) M 1Volumel v/c 1 Delay 1 S i Queue 1
----------------------- -------------------------------
N Approach 33.9 D
1 TH+RT1 24/2 1 .449 1 .422 1 1437 1 1569 1 1553 1 .990 1 35.0 1 D 1 568 ft1
9 LT 1 24/2 1 .175 1 .156 1 86 1 551 1 224 1 .407 1 26.3 1 D+1 120 fti
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
S Approach 85.3a F
1 RT 1 12/1 1 .310 1 .233 1 216 1 366 1 360 1 .976 1 56.1 1 E 1 349 ftl
1LT+TH 1 24/2 1 .481 1 .233 1 317 1 517 1 975 11.886 1 96.1a1 F 1 473 ft1
...............................................................................
E Approach 14.1 8
---------------------
1LT+TH 1 24/2 1 .237 1 .411 1 1279 1 1415 1 539 1 .381 1 14.1 1 8 1 201 ft1
.................................................................... --
Approach 11.8 8
�TH 1 48/4 1 .210 1 .511 1 3751 1 3808 1 957 1 .251 1 9.4 1 B+1 148 ft1
1 LT 1 12/1 1 .060 1 .067 1 266 1 314 1 252 1 .803 1 20.9 1 C 1 156 ft1
.................................---------....------------ ---....---------
ift! BRICKELL AVENUE
iCKELL AVENUE AND BRICKELL TOWNHOUSE
BACKGROUND 1999 TRAFFIC VOLUMES
SIGNAL94/TEAPACIVI 0.4I - Capacity Analysis Summary
10/26/98
08:41:15
Intersection Averages:
Degree of Saturation (v/c) .65 Vehicle Delay 11.1 Level of Service B
-------------------------------------------------
Sq 27 1 Phase 1 1 Phase 2 1 Phase 3 1 Phase 4 1
*+/e*-------------------------------------------------
q ++ 1 ++ q m q q
1 + + q + + 1 ++++q 1
/1® 1 + +a q + +a 1 q 1
1 q v q v 1 ++++q o 1
1 1 q o q v q++++ 1
North 1 1 �+ + +tq q 1
1 +++q q v 1
.................................................
I G/C= .056 q G/C= .511 q G/C= .100 1 G/C= .122 1
1 G= 5.00 1 G= 46.01 q G= 9.00 q G= 11.0" 1
1 Y+R= 3.01 1 Y+R= 5.00 1 Y+R= 6.0" 1 Y+R= 5.0" 1
® 1-OFF434w4%-1-OFF=43-3%-1-OFF=--�O%-q-OFF=16:7%-q
C= 90 sec G= 71.0 sec = 78.9% Y=19.0 sec = 21.1% Ped= .0 sec = .0%
-------------------------------------------------....----------^------------..-..
1 Lane gWidth/1 g/C 1 Service Rate1 Adj 1 1 HCM q L 190% Maxi
1 Group 1 Lanesq Reqd Used 1 @C (vph) @E gVolumeq v/c 1 Delay 1 S 1 Queue q
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
N Approach 9.8 8+
TH 24/2 1 .484 1 .622 1 2294 1 2318 1 1709 1 .737 1 9.9 1 8+1 408 ftq
1 LT 1 12/1 1 .000 1 .056 1 147 1 178 1 46 1 .254 1 7.0 1 B+1 25 ftq
--------------------- -.........................................................
S Approach 10,9 8
----------------------------------------------
1 TH+RTq 24/2 1 .351 1 .533 1 1895 1 1964 1 1113 1 .567 1 11.0 1 8 1 329 ftq
1 LT 1 12/1 1 .155 1 .533 1 57 1 75 1 11 1 .133 1 8.1 1 B+1 25 ftq
---------------------------------------------------------- --..-------
E Approach 27,3 D+
- - -- -------------------------------------
ILT+TH+RT1 12/1 1 .167 1 .133 1 1 1 159 1 58 1 .333 1 27.3 1 0+1 64 ftq
....................•------^-------..-..----------..-.-_._.-----•--------------
W Approach 28,7 D+
)ITTH+RT1 1211 1 .185 1 .144 q 1 1 162 1 87 1 ,492 1 28.7 1 D+1 94 ftq
-
---------------------------------------•-------------------------------------
2101 BRICKELL AVENUE 10/26/98
0 1CKELL AVENUE AND SE 15tH RD 08:39:30
CKGROUND 1999 TRAFFIC- PM PEAK
SIGNAL94/TEAPACIVI 1.1.41 • Capacity Analysis Summary
Intersection Averages:
Degree of Saturation (v/c) .63 Vehicle Delay 11.5 Level of Service B
Sq 11 1 Phase 1 1 Phase 2 1
*«/«« -------------------------
q+++ q o q
1 + + + q ++++q
/1® 1`+ + +a q C++++q
i 1 v q o ++++q
1 1 0 1++++ v 1
North q �+ + +41++++s q
1 1 + + + q++++ q
1 +++q v 1
q G/C= .713 1 G/C= .200 i
q G= 82.01 1 G= 23.09 1
Q Y+R= 5.0p Q Y+R= 5.09 1
1 OFF= .0% 1 OFF=75.7% 1
-------------------------
C=115 sec G=105.0 sec = 91.3% Y=10.0 sec = 8.7% Ped= .0 sec = .0%
----•---------------•---------------•------------------------....--------------
1 Lane 1Width/q g/C i Service Rate1 Adj 1 1 HCM i L 190% Maxi
;i Group 1 Lanesl Reqd Used q aC (vph) aE gVolumel v/c i Delay 1 S i Queue 1
-------------------------------------------------------------
N Approach 9.1 8+
-------------------------------------------
9LT+TH+RTi 24/2 1 .609 1 .730 1 2143 1 2158 1 1717 1 .796 1 9.1 1 B+1 374 ft1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
S Approach 5.1 8+
9 TH+RTQ 24/2 1 .351 1 .730 Q 2684 q 2685 q 865 1 .322 1 4.2 1 A 1 188 ft1
1 LT 1 12/1 1 .677 1 .730 i 68 1 85 i 61 1 .670 1 17.6 1 C+q 27 ft1
,-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
• E Approach 29.5 D+
iLT+TH+RTi 24/2 1 .278 1 .217 1 .1 1 499 1 199 1 .391 1 29.5 1 D+1 126 ft1
----------------------------------..------------------------------....----------
W Approach 40.7 E+
1LT+TH+RTQ 12/1 1 .323 1 .217 i 1 1 267 1 221 1 .775 1 40.7 1 E+i 280 ft1
01 6RICKELL AVENUE
ICKELL AVENUE AND SE 13TH RD
BACKGROUND 1999 TRAFFIC- PM PEAK
SIGNAL94/TEAPAC(V1 L1.41 - Capacity Analysis Summary
10/19/98
14:34:21
Intersection Averages:
Degree of Saturation (v/c) .85 Vehicle Delay 37.1a Level of Service D
a'1 expect more delay due to extreme v/c's (see EVALUATE)
Sq 17 q- ...
Phase1 q Phase 2q Phase-3 q
q + + + t t + ----.t
q + + + q ++++q + q
/qa q�+ + +c q ++++qa + q
t t v q....q0 t
t t 0 q v i++++ q
I North q a+ + +aq +tQ++++c t
t t +++ q + q++++ q
q +++q +q V t
-------------------------------------
i q G/C= .600 q G/C= .139 q G/C= .130 q
t G= 69.0" q G= 16.09 q G= 15.0f q
q Y+R= 5.0# q Y+R= 5.0- q Y+R= 5.0" q
qOFF=87�-_ OXqOFF=51�3%I OFF=69.6X
- .q
C=115 sec G=100.0 sec = 87.0% Y=15.0 sec = 13.0% Ped= .0 sec = .0%
---------------------------------------------------------------
; q Lane iWidth/q g/C q Service Rateq Adj q t HCM q L 190% Maxi
t Group q Lanesq Reqd Used q aC (vph) aE iVolumeq v/c q Delay Q S q Queue q
-------------------------------------------------------------
N Approach 8.5 B+
q RT q 12/1 i .428 q .791 q 1234 t 1253 q 520 t .415 q 3.0 i A q 175 ftQ
J t TH q 24/2 q .435 q .617 t 2227 q 2300 1 1362 q .592 q 10.4 q B q 421 ftq
t LT q 12/1 q .569 q .617 q 80 t 103 q 58 Q .527 i 13.1 9 8 q 36 ftq
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
i
S Approach 37.68 D
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
t RT q 12/1 q .274 q .800 q 1251 q 1267 q 118 q .093 q 1.9 Q A Q 38 ftQ
' 9 TH q 24/2 q .381 q .617 q 2227 q 2300 q 1062 q .462 q 9.1 q 8+1 328 ftQ
t LT q 12/1 11.000 t .617 i 66 q 85 q 348 13.742 i 136.8a1 F Q 215 ftQ
---------------------------------------- ------------------
E Approach
-------------
-66.7 F
t RT q 12/1 t .268 q .157 q 1 Q 226 i 96 q .387 i 33.6 O D q 131 ftQ
' t TH q 12/1 q .318 i .157 i 1 i 270 Q 307 11.051 q 93.6 t F Q 419 ftQ
,rs'--LT. 9 12/1 1 .285 1 .157 Q 1 Q 255 q 177 q .639 1 37.9 Q D q 241 fti
101 BRICKELL AVENUE 10/19/98
RICKELL AVENUE AND SE 13TH RD 14:34:21
j BACKGROUND 1999 TRAFFIC- PM PEAK
j SIGNAL94/TEAPACEVI 1.1.43 - Capacity Analysis Summary (cont.)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 Lane 1Width/1 9/C 1 Service Rate1 Adj 1 1 HCM 1 L 190% Mad
' 1 Group 1 Lanesl Reqd Used 1 @C (vph) aE 1Volumel v/c 1 Delay 1 S 1 oueue 1
..................................................
W Approach 88.4a F
1 RT 1 12/1 1 .286 1 .148 1 1 1 211 1 162 1 .692 1 41.1 1 E+1 223 ft1
1 TH 1 12/1 1 .319 1 .148 1 1 1 252 1 311 11.131 1 120.2@1 F 1 428 ft1
1 LT 1 12/1 1 .309 1 .148 1 1 1 239 1 262 11.000 1 80.0 1 F 1 361 ft1
r
t
1
S
1
3
Ri.
101 BRICKELL AVENUE
.MIAMI AVENUE AND SE 26TH RD
BACKGROUND 1999 TRAFFIC- PM PEAK
i
f SIGNAL94/TEAPACCVI L1.41 - Capacity Analysis Suimary
10/20/98
10:18:26
Intersection Averages:
Degree of Saturation (v/c) .59 Vehicle Delay 28.7 level of Service D+
Sq 44 q Phase 1
q Phase 2
q Phase 3 q Phase 4 q
;ra/►r
.................................................
q +
q ++
q q q
q +
q ++
/q®
q +a
q + +a
q q a++++q
q
q
q V
q o ++++q o ++++q
q
q
q o
q++++ v q++++ v q
North
q
q +
q q++++t q
9
Q+
q +
a+
q ++
q q q
i
q +
q ++
q q 1
"�{
-------------------------------------------------
q G/C= .167
q G/C= .211
q G/C= .122 q G/C= .311 q
f�i
q G= 15.00
q G= 19.0"
q G= 11.0" q G= 28.011 q
q Y+R= 3.0"
q Y+R= 6.00
q Y+R= 3.O0 q Y+R= 5.00 q
q OFF=90.0%
q OFF=10.0%
q OFF=37.8X q OFF=53.3% q
-------------------------------------------------
C= 90 sec
G= 73.0 sec
= 81.1X Y=17.0 sec = 18.9X Ped= .0 see = .0%
q Lane Width/q g/C q Service Rate9 Adj q q HCM q L g90X Maxq
q Group q Lanesq Reqd Used q SC (vph) @E gVolumeq v/c q Delay q S q Queue q
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
t
N Approach 20.5 C
q TH q 24/2 q .194 q .244 q 627 q 911 q 358 q .393 q 21.7 q C q 171 ftq
1 q LT q 12/1 q .013 q .167 q 315 q 378 q 53 q .140 q 11.7 q 8 q 37 ftq
i
S Approach 43.7 E+
. q TH q 24/2 q .237 q .244 q 627 q 911 q 590 q .646 q 24.3 q C q 282 ftq
q LT q 12/1 q .214 q .167 q 394 q 456 q 484 11.061 q 67.3 q F q 320 ftq
i----------------------------------------.......-------------------------------
E Approach
17.2 C+
. q
TH q 1211 q .172 q .333 g 486 q 621 1
102 q .164 q
16.1 q C+q 66 ftq
1
LT q 12/1 q .103 q .122 q 285 q 332 q
250 q .753 q
17.6 q C+q 162 ftq
pproech
17.4 C+
q
TH q 36/3 1 .215 q .333 q 1629 q 1863 q
738 q .396 q
17.6 q C+q 207 ftq
q
LT 1 12/1 1 .000 q .122 1 568 1 641 1
21 1 .033 1
9.1 1 e+q 25 ftq
1�
001 BRICKELL AVENUE
MIAMI AVENUE AND SE 25TH RD
BACKGROUND 1999 TRAFFIC- PM PEAK
SiGNAL94/TEAPACEVI 1.1.43 - Capacity Analysis Summary
10/19/98
14:45:11
Intersection Averages:
Degree of Saturation Cv/c) .29 Vehicle Delay 9.5 Level of Service 8+
.........................
Sq 11 1 Phase 1 i Phase 2 1
•+/re .........................
q+++ q o 1
+ +a 1 Q++++q
i 1 v i o ++++1
v 1
North q a+ + +aq++++a q
........... -.............
G/C= .700 1 G/C= .189 1
i 1 G= 63.01, 1 G= 17.0" 1
i Y+R= 5.0^ 1 Y+R= 5.0" 1
011=93.3% 1 OFF=68.9% i
.........................
C= 90 sec G= 80.0 sec = 88.9% Y=10.0 sec = 11.1% Ped= .0 sec = .0%
l--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
j 1 Lane iUidth/1 g/C i Service Rate1 Adj 1 1 HCM 1 L 190% Maxi
1 Group i Lanesl Reqd Used 1 aC Evph) aE 1Volumel v/c 1 Delay i S i Queue 1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
N Approach 3.1 A
1LT+TH+RTi 24/2 1 .227 1 .722 1 2458 1 2458 1 483 1 .197 1 3.1 1 A 1 85 fti
-------------------------------
S Approach 3.1 A
i
iLT+TH+RT1 24/2 1 .234 1 .722 1 1708 1 1716 1 345 1 .201 1 3.1 1 A 1 61 ft1
r
i E Approach 26.5 D+
1 TH+RT1 12/1 i .227 1 .211 1 205 1 386 1 241 1 .620 1 26.6 1 D+i 241 fti
i LT 1 12/1 1 .147 1 .211 1 173 1 330 1 6 1 .018 1 21.4 1 C 1 25 fti
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ll Approach 23.1 C
:(P'TH+RT1 12/1 1 .154 1 .211 1 195 1 369 1 37 1 .099 1 21.7 1 C i 37 ft1
LT 1 12/1 1 .202 1 .211 1 53 1 108 1 47 1 .388 1 24.2 1 C 1 47 fti
-------------------------------------•-----------------------------------------
I qw
f
Total 1999 PM Peak Period
With Project
I
W
1 BRICKELL AVENUE
CKELL AVENUE AND S. MIAMI AVENUE
•TOTAL1999 TRAFFIC- PM PEAK
`SIGNAL94/TEAPAC(V1 L1.43 - Capacity Analysis Summary
10/26/98
08:48:15
Intersection Averages:
Degree of Saturation (v/c) .75 Vehicle Delay 37.9@ Level of Service D
2 expect more delay due to extreme v/cOs (see EVALUATE)
...................................... ....••---•
Sq 51 1 Phase 1 1 Phase 2 9 Phase 3 1 Phase 4 1
+«/*r.................................................
q +0 1+++0 1 + + 1 0 1
. 1 + 44++1 + + + ++++1 + + 1 ++++1
+ +¢ 1R+ +
1 4 q v 1 v i 1
,North t e+ 1 9 a+ + +c1++++¢
q 1++++ + 1 1 + + + 1++++ q
r 1 v+ 9+++1 v 1
-------------------•---------•-----------••--•---
t 1 G/C= .056 1 G/C= .222 1 G/C= .244 1 G/C= .278 1
S 1 G= 5.0" 1 G= 20.01 1 G= 22.00 1 G= 25.00 1
1 Y+R= 3.0" 1 Y+R= 3.0" 1 Y+R= 6.01 1 Y+R= 6.00 1
1 OFF= 6.7% 1 OFF=15.6% 1 OFF=41.1% 1 OFF-72.2% 1
C= 90 sec G= 72.0 sec = 80.0X Y=18.0 sec = 20.0% Ped= .0 sec = .0%
'1 Lane Width/1 g/c 1 Service Rate1 Adj 1 i HCM 1 L 190% Maxi
1 Group 1 Lanesl Reqd used 1 aC (vph) SE 1Volumel v/c 1 Delay 1 S 1 Queue i
-------------------------------------------...---.....-------------------------
N Approach 13.7 8
1 TH+RT1 24/2 1 .298 1 .533 1 1914 1 1983 1 880 1 .444 1 9.9 1 8+1 260 ft1
i LT 1 2412 1 .239 1 .311 1 893 1 1101 1 565 1 .513 1 19.7 1 C+1 246 ft1
.....................................................................
S Approach 37.3 D
TH+RT1 24/2 1 .323 1 .278 1 788 1 1034 1 997 1 .964 1 39.1 1 D 1 455 ft1
LT 1 12/1 1 .030 1 .056 1 131 1 175 1 89 1 .492 1 17.7 1 C+1 T ft1
.......... ..................................... ------------------------------
Approach 17.1 C+
RT 1 12/1 1 .258 1 .656 1 997 1 1038 1 263 1 .253 1 4.9 1 A 1 115 fti
TH 1 24/2 1 .271 1 .311 1 945 1 1159 1 755 1 .651 1 21.3 1 C 1 329 ft1
--•.........................................................................
Ipproach- 80.2a F
RT 1 12/1 1 .159 1 .400 1 528 1 633 1 50 1 .079 1 12.7 1 B 1 38 ft1
TH 1 24/2 1 .387 1 .311 1 945 1 1159 1 1288 11.111 1 82.8a1 F 1 561 ft1
0
01 BRICKELL AVENUE 10/26/98
ICKELL AVENUE AND SE 26TH RD 08:44:44
TOTAL 1999 TRAFFIC - PM PEAK
` SIGNAL94/TEAPAC(V1 0.41 - Capacity Analysis Summary
Intersection Averages:
Degree of Saturation (v/c) .93 Vehicle Delay 41.4@ Level of Service E+
Q expect more delay due to extreme v/c's (see EVALUATE)
......................................
Sq 23 1 Phase 1 1 Phase 2 1 Phase 3 1 Phase 4 1
r•/4•.................................................
1+++ q++ 9 Q 1
1+++ 1++ 1 1` 1
1a+ + 1 1 tl++++1
1 9 V 1 v q o 1 0++++1
1 1 1 0 1++++ 1++++ v 1
North i i �+ + +c1++++C 1++++C 1
1 1 1 +++1 1 1
1 q +++q 1 q
-------------------------------------------------
1 1 G/C= .156 1 G/C= .200 1 G/C= .067 1 G/C= .389 1
i 1 G= 14.00 1 G= MOM 1 G= 6.Op 1 G= 35.0" Q
1 Y+R= 3.00 1 Y+R= 6.0. 1 Y+R= 3.0" 1 Y+R= 5.0'f 1
1 OFF=87.8% q OFF= 6.7% 1 OFF=33.3% 1 OFF=43.3% i
C= 90 sec G= 73.0 see = 81.1% Y=17.0 sec = 18.9% Ped= .0 see = .0%
t 1 Lane Width/1 g/C 1 Service Rate1 Adj 1 1 HCM Q L 190% Maxi
9 Group 1 Lanesl Reqd Used 1 @C (vph) aE 1Volumel v/c 1 Delay 1 S Q Queue 1
N Approach 36.1 D
----------------
1 TH+RT1 24/2 1 .453 1 .422 1 1436 1 1567 1 1569 11.001 1 37.5 1 D 1 573 ftQ
1 LT 1 24/2 1 .175 1 .156 1 86 1 551 1 225 1 .408 1 26.3 Q D+1 120 ft1
S Approach 85.551 F
i RT 1 12/1 1 .310 1 .233 1 216 1 366 1 360 1 .976 1 56.1 1 E 1 349 ftQ
1LT+TH 1 24/2 1 .488 1 .233 1 314 1 512 1 982 11.918 1 96.3@1 F 1 476 ftq
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
E Approach 14.1 8
1LT+TH 1 24/2 1 .237 1 .411 1 1279 1 1415 1 539 1 .381 1 14.1 1-8 1-201 ftQ
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
11 Approach 12.9 8
iJ;7%
TH 1 48/4 1 .210 Q .511 1 3751 1 3808 1 957 1 .251 1 9.4 1 8+1 148 ftQ
Q LT 1 12/1 1 .068 1 .067 1 266 1 314 1 267 1 .850 1 25.5 1 D+1 165 ft1
----------------------------------------------- ...............................
M
01 BRICKELL AVENUE 10/26/98
ICKELL AVENUE AND SE 26TH RD 08:45:51
TOTAL 1999 TRAFFIC - PM PEAK
SiGNAL94/TEAPACEVI 0.43 - Capacity Analysis Summary
Intersection Averages:
Degree of Saturation (v/c) .70 Vehicle Delay 20.3 Level of Service C
Sq 23 1 Phase 1
1 Phase 2 1 Phase 3
1 Phase 4 1
-------------------------------------------------
+ +
1++
q 9
.
q++*
1++
+ «¢
1�+ + 1
1 a++++1
1
1 V
1 v 1 o
q o ++++q
1
1
1 0 9++++
1++++ v 1
North
1
1 * * +¢1++++¢
q++++¢ 1
T
1
1
Q
1 **+1
1 1
t
1
1*«*1
1 1
.................................................
1 G/C= .076
1 G/C= .402 1 G/C= .162
1 G/C= .181 1
1 G= 6.90
1 G= 36.2" 1 G= 14.60
1 G= 16.3" i
j
1 Y+R= 4.00
1 Y+R= 4.00 1 Y+R= 4.0"
1 Y+R= 4.01 1
1 OFF=87.8%
i OFF=99.9% 1 OFF=44.5%
1 OFF=65.2% 1
-------------------------------------------------
-
C= 90 sec
G= 74.0 sec = 82.2X Y=16.0 sec = 17.8X Ped= .0 sec = .0%
...............................
1 Lane 1Width/1 g/C 1 Service Rate1 Ad! 1 1 HCM 1 L 190% Maxi
1 Group 1 Lanesl Reqd Used 1 &C (vph) @E 1Volumei v/c 1 Delay 1 S 1 Queue 1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
' N Approach 17.2 C+
1 TH+RT1 24/2 1 .453 1 .534 1 1912 1 1981 1 1569 1 .792 1 14.5 1 B 1 463 ft1
1 LT 1 2412 1 .175 1 .087 1 1 1 296 1 225 1 .728 1 36.1 1*D 1 130 fti
--------------------- -.........................................................
i
S Approach 24.3 C
i RT 1 12/1 1 .310 1 .413 1 552 1 654 1 360 1 .550 1 16.0 1 C+1 267 ft1
iLT+TH 1 24/2 1 .423 1 .413 9 952 1 1075 1 982 1 .913 1 27.4 1*0+1 365 ft1
...................------......---------------...------------------------.........
E Approach 31.7 D+
iLT+TH 1 24/2 1 .237 1 .193 1 319 1 664 1 539 1 .812 1 31.7 1*0+1 275 fti
-----------------------------^.---......--------------------^---...............
W Approach 15.2 C+
TH 1 48I4 1 .210 9 .399 1 2805 1 2976 1 957 1 .322 q 14.2 1 6 1 182 ft1
1 LT 1 1211 1 .144 1 .174 1 320 1 390 1 267 1 .685 1 18.9 1*C+1 203 ft1
0
01 BRICKELL AVENUE 10/26/98
ICKELL AVENUE AND BRICKELL TOWNHOUSE 08:42:26
TOTAL 1999 TRAFFIC VOLUMES
SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 1.1.41 - Capacity Analysis Summary
Intersection Averages:
Degree of Saturation (v/c) .66 Vehicle Delay 11.3 Level of Service B
............................
- .'.. .'.
Sq 27 1PhaseI 1 Phase21Phase 3 1 Phase 4 9
q ++ q ++
q + + i + +
/qm q + +a q + +a 1 1 1
1 1 v 1 v q ++++q o q
1 1 1 0 1 v 1+++* 1
North 1 q + + +¢q q 1
1 1 1 6+ ++ q q++++ q
v q
-------------------------------------------------
'+ 1 G/C= .056 1 G/C= .511 1 G/C= .100 1 G/C= .122 q
1 G= 5.0" q G= 46.0' 1 G= 9.0" q G= 11.08 1
i Y+R= 3.0" 1 Y+R= 5.0" 1 Y+R= 6.0" i Y+R= 5.0" 1
1 OF1=34.4% q OFF=43.3X q OFF= .OX 1 1111=16.7% 1
a:.
C= 90 see G= 71.0 sec = 78.9% Y=19.0 sec = 21.1% Ped= .0 sec = .0%
1 Lane 1Width/1 g/C 1 Service Rate1 Adj 1 1 RCM 1 L 190% Maxi
1 Group 1 Lsnesl Reqd Used 1 X (vph) aE 1Volumeq v/c 1 Delay i S q Queue 1
------------------------------------------------------------ -------------------
N Approach 10.0 8
1 TH 1 24/2 1 .489 1 .622 1 2294 1 2318 1 1731 1 .747 q 10.1 1 B 1 414 ftq
9 LT 1 12/1 1 .000 q .056 1 147 1 178 1 46 1 .254 1 7.1 q B+i 25 ftq
--------------------- ...----------------------------
S Approach 17.1 8
9 TH+RTq 24/2 1 .356 1 .533 1 1896 q 1965 1 1136 1 .578 1 11.1 q 8 1 335 ft1
1 LT 1 12/1 1 .155 1 .533 1 57 1 75 1 11 1 .133 1 8.1 1 0+1 25 ft1
„----------------------------•----^--------....................................
E Approach 27.3 D+
iLT+TH+RTq 1211 1 .167 1 .133 1 1 1 159 1 58 1 .333 1 27.3 1 D+1 64 ftq
............................................... ................. ^--------------
- W Approach ---------------28-7
---U±---------
+TH+RTi 12/1 1 .185 1 .144 1 1 1 162 1 87 1 .492 1 28.7 1 D+q 94 ft1
-----------------------------•-----------.........------------------.........--
.JV— 'J 1i
( a;
1 BRICKELL AVENUE
ICKELL AVENUE AND SE 15TH RD
TOTAL 1999 TRAFFIC- PM PEAK
SIGNAL94/TEAPACCVI 0.43 - Capacity Analysis Summary
10/26/98
08:40:12
intersection Averages:
Degree of Saturation (v/c) .64 Vehicle Delay 11.6 Level of Service 8
Sq 11 1 Phase 1 1 Phase 2 1
•k/�e
q+++ q o q
q + + + q ++++q
q a++++q
1 q v 1 0++++q
q q o q++++ V q
North i �+ + +eq++++e q
1 q + + + q+++4, q
q +++1 v q
.........................
I G/C= .713 1 G/C= .200 1
1 G= 82.01 1 G= 23.01 1
1 Y+R= 5.0" 1 Y+R= 5.0^ 1
1 OFF= ,0% q OFF=75.7% 1
-------------------------
C=115 sec G=105.0 sec = 91.3% Y=10.0 sec = 8.7% Ped= .0 sec = .0%
-------------
1 Lane 1width/1 g/C 1 Service Rate1 Adj 1 i HCM 1 L 190% Maxi
1 Group 1 Lanesl Reqd Used 1 aC (vph) @E 1Volumel v/c 1 Delay 1 S 1 Queue q
---------------------------------- -------------------------------
N Approach 9,3 8+
1LT+TH+RTq 24/2 1 .613 1 .730 1 2131 1 2146 1 1724 1 .803 1 9.3 1 8+1 376 fti
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
S Approach 5,1 g+
- ---------------------
1 TH+RTq 24/2 1 .353 1 .730 1 2684 1 2685 1 873 1 .325 1 4.2 1 A 1 190 ft1
q LT 1 12/1 1 .677 1 .730 1 68 1 85 1 61 1 .670 1 17.6 1 C+q 27 ft1
E Approach 29,5 D+
- -- -- ----------------------------
1LT+TH+RTq 24/2 1 .278 1 .217 1 1 1 499 1 199 1 .391 1 29.5 q D+1 126 ft1
-----------------------------------------------------•-------------------------
u Approach 40.7 E+
--H+RTq 12/1 1 .323 1 .217 1 1 1 267 1 221 1 .775 1 40.7 1 E+q 280 ft1
0 1 091CKELL AVENUE
CKELLL AVENUE AND SE 13TH RD
TOTAL 1999 TRAFFIC- PM PEAK
SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1.43 - Capacity Analysis Summary
10/19/98
15:15:58
Intersection Averages:
Degree of Saturation (v/c) .85 Vehicle Delay 37.1a Level of Service 0
61 expect more delay due to extreme v/c's (see EVALUATE)
.......----- ------- ---
Sq 17 Q Phase 1 1 Phase 2 1 Phase 3 Q
'•t/+* -------------------------------------
q+++ q o 1+ 1
++++q + q
/q® 1�+ + +a 1 e++++1.+ 1
1 Q v q ++++1 o q
North 1 6+ + +Cj +QQ++++4 1
q q + + + q + 1++++ q
q +++1 +1 v q
--•----------------------------------
1 G/C= .600 1 G/C= .139 1 G/C= .130 1
1 G= 69.01, 1 G= 16.01 1 G= 15.0" 1
1 Y+R= 5.0" 1 Y+R= 5.01 1 Y+R= 5.0ff 1
Q 01147.0% 1 OFF=51.3X Q 011=69.6% 1
:. -------------------------------------
C=115 sec G=100.0 sec = 87.0% Y=15.0 see = 13.0% Ped= .0 sec = .0%
1 Lane Width/1 g/C Q Service Rate1 Adj Q 1 HCM Q L 190% Max1
1 Group Q Lanesl Reqd Used Q aC (vph) aE QVolumeQ v/c 1 Delay 1 S 1 Queue 1
-------------------------------
N Approach
8.5 B+
9 RT
1 12/1 1 .428 1 .791 1 1234 1 1253 1
520 1 .415 1
3.0 1 A 1 175 ft1
Q TH
1 24/2 1 .436 1 .617 1 2227 1 2300 1
1368 1 .595 1
10.4 1 B 1 423 ftQ
1 LT
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 12/1 1 .516 1 .617 1 79 1 102 1
58 1 .532 1
13.3 1 8 1 36 ft1
S Approach
37.5@ D
1 RT
1 12/1 1 .274 1 .800 1 1251 1 1267 1
118 1 .093 1
1.9 1 A 1 38 ft1
1 TH
1 24/2 1 .382 1 .617 1 2227 1 2300 1
1069 1 .465 1
9.1 Q 8+1 331 ftq
1 LT
---------------------•---------------------------------------------------------
1 12/1 11.000 1 .617 1 66 1 85 1
348 13.742 1
136.8a1 F 1 215 ft1
E Approach
66.7 F
1 RT
1 12/1 1 .268 1 .157 1 1 1 226 q
96 1 .387 1
33.6 1 D 1 131 ftQ
1 TH
1 12/1 1 .318 1 .157 1 1 1 270 1
307 11.051 1
93.6 Q F 1 419 ft1
:Gy LT
1 12/1 1 .285 1 .157 1 1 1 255 1
177 1 .639 1
37.9 1 D 1 241 ftQ
(ZD
01 BRICKELL AVENUE 10/19/98
ICKELL AVENUE AND SE 13TH RD 15:15:59
TOTAL 1999 TRAFFIC- PM PEAK
i
SIGNAL94/TEAPAC(V1 L1.41 - Capacity Analysis Summery (cont.)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
j 1 Lane 1Width/1 g/C 1 Service Ratei Adj 1 1 HCM 1 L 190% Maxi
' 1 Group 1 Lanesi Reqd Used 1 ITC (vph) SE 1Volumel v/c 1 Delay 1 S 1 Queue 1
................................................ .................
t
W Approach 88.40 F
1 1 RT 1 12/1 1 .286 1 .148 1 1 1 211 1 162 1 .692 1 41.1 1 E+1 223 ft1
1 TH 1 12/1 1 .319 1 .148 1 1 1 252 1 311 11.131 1 120.2a1 F 1 428 ft1
1 LT 1 12/1 1 .309 1 .148 1 1 1 239 1 262 11.000 1 80.0 1 F 1 361 ft1
t
y
0
01 9RICKELL AVENUE 10/26/98
.MIAMI AVENUE AND SE 26TH RO 08:49:26
TOTAL 1099 TRAFFIC- PM PEAK
SiGNAL94/TEAPACEVI 0.41 - Capacity Analysis Summary
Intersection Averages:
Degree of Saturation (v/c) .59 Vehicle Delay 28.7 Level of Service D+
Sq 44 1 Phase 1 1 Phase 2 1 Phase 3 1 Phase 4 1
re/** .................................................
q q ++ q q q
q + q ++
/q® q +a 1 + +t q q ++++q
q q q v q o ++++q o++++q
4 1 1 C 1++++ v q++++ v q
North i a+ q @+ + q q++++a 9
1 1 + 9 ++ 1 1 1
1 + 1 ++ 1 1 1
----------------------------------------------•--
1 G/C= .167 1 G/C= .211 1 G/C= .122 1 G/C= .311 1
{ 1 G= 15.011 1 G= 19.0" 1 G= 11.0r 1 G= 28.0" i
1 Y+R= 3.011 q Y+R= 6.0" 1 Y+R= 3.0" 1 Y+R= 5.0" 1
1 OFF=90.0% 1 OFF=10.0% 1 OFF=37.8% 1 OFF=53.3% 1
- C= 90 sec G= 73.0 sec = 81.1X Y=17.0 sec = 18.9X Ped= .0 sec = .OX
1 Lane 1Width/1 g/C i Service Rate1 Adj 1 1 HCM 1 L 190% Maxi
1 Group 1 Lanesl Reqd Used 1 aC (vph) SE 1Volummel v/c i Delay 1 S 1 Queue q
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
N Approach
20.3 C
1 TH 1 24/2 1 .194 1 .244 1
627 1
911 1
358 1 .393 1
21.7 1 C 1 171 ft1
1 LT 1 12/1 q .017 1 .167 1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
315 1
378 1
61 1 .161 1
11.8 1 8 1 43 ft1
S Approach
43.7 E+
1 TH 1 24/2 1 .237 1 .244 1
627 1
911 1
590 q .648 1
24.3 1 C 1 282 ft1
1 LT 1 12/1 1 .214 1 .167 1
394 1
456 1
484 11.061 1
67.3 1 F 1 320 ft1
E Approach 17.4 C+
1 TH i 12/1 q .174 i .333 1 486 1 621 q 107 1 .172 1 16.1 1 C+i 90 ft1
1 LT 1 12/1 1 .104 1 .122 1 283 1 330 1 250 1 .758 1 17.9 1 C+q 162 ft1
..............................
pproach 17.4 C+
-------------------- ----- ------------------------------
1 TH 1 36/3 1 .215 1 .333 1 1629 1 1863 1 744 1 .399 1 17.6 1 C+1 209 ft1
1 LT 1 12/1 1 .000 1 .122 1 560 1 633 1 21 1 .033 1 9.1 1 B+1 25 ftq
00U01
9
I BRICKELL AVENUE 10/19/98
MIAMI AVENUE AND SE 25TH RD 15:03:33
TOTAL 1999 TRAFFIC- PM PEAK
SIGNAL94/TEAPACEVI L1.41 - Capacity Analysis Summary
Intersection Averages:
Degree of Saturation (v/c) .29 Vehicle Delay 9.6 Level of Service B+
Sq 11 1 Phase i q Phase 2 q
««/«« ------------------
@++++q
q q v q o ++++q
q q o q++++ v q
North q + + +aq++++¢ q
Q
q +++q v q
.........................
q G/C= .700 1 G/C= .189 1
q G= 63.0- q G= 17.0- 1
q Y+R= 5.0^ q Y+R= 5.Om q
q OFF=93.3% q OFF=68.9% q
C= 90 see G= 80.0 sec = 88.9% Y=10.0 sec = 11.1% Ped= .0 sec = .0%
;q Lane quidth/q g/C q Service Rateq Adj i i HCM i L 190% Maxi
q Group q Lanesq Reqd Used q aC (vph) ME gVolumeq v/c q Delay q S q Queue i
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
N Approach 3.1 A
qLT+TH+RTq 24/2 q .227 q .722 q 2457 1 2457 1 485 1 .197 1 3.1 i A 1 85 ftq
S Approach 3.1 A If
qLT+TH+RTq 24/2 1 .238 1 .722 q 1697 1 1706 q 356 1 .209 1 3.1 1 A 1 63 fti
-------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------
E Approach 26.5 D+
i TH+RTq 1211 1 .227 1 .211 q 205 q 386 1 241 q .620 q 26.6 q D+i 241 fti
i LT 1 12/1 1 .147 1 .211 q 169 1 323 1 6 q .018 1 21.4 q C 1 25 ftq
------------------------------------------------------------- -----------
N Approach 23.1 C
------ -- ---------------------
TH+RTq 12/1 1 .157 1 .211 1 191 1 362 1 45 1 .123 1 21.9 1 C 1 45 ftq
LT q 12/1 q .202 1 .211 1 53 q 108 1 47 1 •388 q 24.2 1 C 1 47 ftq
-
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Center for Microcomputers In Transportation
1ftCS! Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 page 1
♦*r�rrrrrrrarrrrarrrrrrarrrarsrrr**rrra*rraaraaara*rararrrraarr
r
t File Name BRICKELL.HCO
Streets: (N-S) BRICKELL AVENUE (E-W) ACCESS
Major Street Direction.... NS
Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min)
Analyst ................... PBSJ
Date of Analysis.......... 10/30/98
Other Information.........
i
TWO -Way Stop -controlled Intersection
1 Northbound q Southbound q Eastbound q Westbound
q L T Rq L T R1 i T Rq L T R
No. lanes � ' 0 ---Z ---0�...OQ 2 -^09---0 ---0 ..-Oq---' -..O ...;
Stop/Yield 1 N1 NJ 1
Volumes 1 924 201 6 1559 q 1 19 6
i PHF
4 q .95 .951 .95 .95 q q .95 .95
Grade 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0
MC's (x) q 0 01 0 0 1 1 0 0
SU/RV1s (X)1 0 01 0 0 1 q 0 0
CV,s (X) q 0 Oq 0 0 1 1 0 0
PCEI's q 1.1 1.11 1.1 1.1 1 1 1.1 1.1
Adjustment Factors
Vehicle Critical Follow-up
i Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf)
--------------------------------------------
Left Turn Major Road 5.50
2.10
Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60
Through Traffic Minor Road 6.50 3.30
Left Turn Minor Road 7.00 3.40
i
t
i
i
0
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
CS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 2
********ffR*R*****►*►***R**f*f►R***►f►RfRRf RRfR***RR*f►ffRf►**f
WorkSheet for TWSC Intersection
I .......................................................
Step 1: RT from Minor Street
WB EB
j
-----------•------------------------------------------•-
Conflicting Flows: (vph)
472
Potential Capacity: (pcph)
798
Movement Capacity: (pcph)
798
f
t
Prob. of Queue -free State:
0.99
Step 2: LT from Major Street
SB " NB
---------------- •---- 1-1----------
Conflicting Flows: (vph)
----------------•---
944
'
Potential Capacity: (pcph)
534
Movement Capacity: (pcph)
534
Prob. of Queue -free State:
0.99
TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl)
3400
RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl)
Major LT Shared Lane Prob.
of Queue -free State:
0.97
----------------------•--•-•------•----•------•------•--
Step 4: LT from Minor Street
WB ES
onflicting Flows:•(vph) --------------2499-------------
Potential Capacity: (pcph)
27
!
Major LT, Minor TH
Ji
Impedance Factor:
0.97
Adjusted Impedance Factor:
0.97
Capacity Adjustment Factor
due to Impeding Movements
0.97
Movement Capacity: (pcph)
--------------------------------------------------------
26
ki I
v
I
Center for Microcomputers In transportation
jjjkCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 3
f
i Intersection Performance Summary
FlowRate MoveCap SharedCap Avg.Total Delay
Movement v(pcph) Cm(pcph) Csh(pcph) Delay LDS By App
...... ...... ......
A 1. 22 26 479.E F
365.E
WS R 7 798 4.6 A
r
$8 L 7 534 6.8 B 0.0
Intersection Delay 3.6
s
i
(
s
r
b
1
a
m
(Z-)
I
r.
Site Plan
(19-
vi
SITE UTILITY STUDY FOR
1~ Drainage BRICKELL BAY VILLAGE
A. Drainage Area
The site, which is located at 2105 Brickell Avenue, has 200 feet of
frontage on Brickell Avenue and protiudcs east into Biscayne Bay. The
Property consists of approximately 3.27 acres.
A residential development consisting of two 4-story apartment buildings
currently occupies the property. The land will be cleared to accommodate
a 29-story apartment building and a 6-story parldng garage.
After development, approximately 69% of the site will be impervious
areas and approximately 31% of the site will remain as pervious areas.
The area for building wall run -of, (1/3 of 2 adjacent walls of the proposed
buildings) consists of approximately 1.15 impervious acres. The total
drainage area (1/3 of building wall area + property area), is 4.42 acres,
The coefficient of run-off is shown in Table 1.
B. Existing Drainage system
The Florida Department of Transportation presently maintains a roadway
drainage system for Brickell Avenue. The existing roadway system is
Independent of the site drainage, and will remain so.
C. Proposed Drainage system
The primary drainage system of this building will consist of drainage
wells, which will allow the runoff from a 5-year storm event to be fully
contained on site. No off -site runoffIs anticipated from this building. It is
anticipated that five 24" diameter drainage wells will be sufficient to
handle the runoff (we Table 1 for drainage calculations).
Table
Drainage Caleulag.onj
Peak Runoff, (Q) m CIA 8 (0.76) (6.17) (4.42) m 20.73 CFS
Assume each 24" diameter well flows
at 2000 gpm a
33,333 gps = 4.46 CFS
Peak -Rung 26 a 4.65 Wells
Flow per well 4.46 CFS
Provide five 24" diameter wells,
t'r 0 6 dvr'1
D. Detention Tank
Design Criteria: 1.5 minute detention time per detention structure.
Volume of tank required to handle 1861 gpm for 1.5 min. - 2792 gal/tank
or 373 cubic feet each.
Provide 5 tanks each with the following interior dimensions:
6' (width) x 5'6" (height) x 12' pength) a 396 cubic feet
Provide 5 tanks with 396 cubic feet volume each
EL Water Distribution
The Miami -Dade Water and Sewer Department (WASD) owns and operates an 8"
and a 20" water main along Brickell Avenue.
The building will have a southeasterly orientation. The water connections to
serve the building will be installed from the existing 20" water main. The
connections will consist of fire line supply, domestic water and irrigation water.
No on -site wells are planned for this project.
The calculations for the anticipated water volumes required for this project are
shoam below, in table 2.
,Fable 2
Water Volumes
Residential Apartments
421 Apts, @ 200 GPD/Apt 84,200 gal
Businem/commercial
2,252 Sq. Ft. @ 10 GPD/100 Sq, Ft. 225 cal
Total Water Demand 84,425 GPD
IM Sanitary Sewer
The Miami -Dade Water and Sewer Department (WASD) owns and operates an
18" gravity sanitary sewer line that flows south along Brickell Avenue. It is
anticipated that a single gravity connection point will be required into an existing
manhole, No pump Station will be built on -site to serve this project. Table 3,
below, provides Sewage flow calculations.
1
Table 3
i{He Flow
Average Daily Flow (from Table 2) 84,425 GPD
Average Flow 59 GPM
Peak Flow 59 X 3.9 (3.9 peak factor). 230 GPM
IV. Solid Waste Generation
Solid waste generated by this project will be collected in standard on -site
containers for refuse and recyclables. Regular pick-up service will be provided
by either private hauling companies and/or the amity of Miami Solid Waste
Department, wbo will transport the waste to Metro -Dade County's disposal or
Recycling facilities.
The project volumes of solid waste generation are shown in Table 4, below.
Table
Solid Waste GenerItigg
Residential Apartments
421 Apts. @ 8 lbs./day/Apt
3,368 lbs.
Buainess/commercial
2,252 Sq. Ft. �7a 4 lbs./100 sq. ft./day
Total solid waste Generation 3,458 lbs.
(1.73 tons/day)
u
11
BRICKELL BAY VILLAGE
ECONOMIC AND TAX IMPACT STUDY
SU13MI17ED TO:
CITY OF MIAMI
PREPARED FOR:
POINT DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
PREPARED BY:
SHARPTON, BRUNSON & COMPANY, P.A.
One Southeast Third Ave.
Suite 2100
Miami, Florida 33131
(305) 374-1574
January 7, 1999
ri. = v
a
Ho
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SUMMARY OF BENEFITS
INTRODUCTION, OBJECTIVES AND DEFINITIONS
Introduction
Objectives
Definition of Economic and Tax Impact
Direct and Indirect Effects
Measures of Economic Impact
Description of Results
THE PROJECT OVERVIEW
DISCUSSION OF THE RESULTS OF THE ANALYSIS
Impact Indicators
Results of Indicators
Impact of Construction
Impact of Ongoing Operations
Impact on Local Tax Revenues
DISCUSSION OF THE RESULTS BY ECONOMIC INDICATOR
Employment
Wages
Output
Local Taxes
OTHER CONSIDERATIONS
Public Sector Cost
Impact Fees
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
EXHIBITS
Exhibit I:
Summary of Economic Impact
Exhibit II:
Summary of all Direct Economic Benefits
Exhibit III:
Computation of Indirect Benefits
Exhibit IV:
Schedule of Project Development Cost
Exhibit V:
Schedule of Ad Valorem Taxes
Exhibit VI:
Allocation of Ad Valorem Taxes
Exhibit VII:
Impact and Other Fees
039-
PAGE
3
3
3
5
6
7
10
11
11
13
15
15
Wn
17
O61
SUMMARY OF BENEFITS
Significant Community Benefits:
• Jobs
• Wages
• Taxes
• Economic Activity
Resident's Spending Impacting Local Businesses:
• Food
• Recreation/Entertainment
• Transportation
• Retail
FA,
BRICKELL BAY VILLAGE - Economic Impact Study January 7,1999
Sharpton, Brunson & Company, RA, Page 1
19- ;jbi
2
SUMMARY OF ECONOMIC IMPACT (BENEFITS)
The following table summarizes the economic impact of the Brickell Bay Village
development:
Construction
Period
Lam=act
i
Annual
ecurri
Economic Activity Stimulated:
Output
$91,537,054
$2,959,740
Wages
13,300,000
760,000
Taxes
1,765,303
Total
$104,837,054
$5,485,043
Jobs created
224
10
Economic Activity
$80,000,000
$60,000,000
$40,000,000
$20,000,000
$0
Construction Annual Recurring
❑ Output ® Wages ® Taxes
BRICKELL BAY VILLAGE - Economic Impact Study January 7, 1999
Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. Page 2
E
M-
BRICKELL BAY VILLAGE
INTRODUCTION, OBJECTIVES AND DEFINITIONS
C � - (r, '-�
tj qj 0 1
INTRODUCTION, OBJECTIVES AND DEFINITIONS
Introduction
This document represents an in-depth economic and tax benefits analysis of the
development and operation of a 420-unit luxury high-rise rental apartment community
located on a waterfront location in the residential section of Brickell Avenue in Miami,
Florida (the Project).
The Project will feature a 23-story tower with 420 apartments atop a 6 story pedestal
garage for 632 cars. In addition, the development will include a 13-slip marina. The
Project will also feature a full -service amenity package consistent with an upscale target
market of working professionals.
The property is located at 2101-2105 Brickell Avenue. The site enjoys a central location
with panoramic views of Biscayne Bay as well as offering excellent accessibility to
employment opportunities in downtown Miami. The property is situated less than a mile
from the Miami central business district, two miles southeast of the Dolphin Expressway
and six miles Southeast of Miami International Airport.
This analysis encompasses the entire Project and estimates the economic and tax benefits
for both its development and operational phases.
Objectives
The objective of this analysis is to provide information on the various benefits created by
the Project and to prepare an estimate of such benefits to Miami, Florida (the City).
Our analysis is based on an economic model which estimates economic and tax impacts
of various projects on a designated area. The model is specifically tailored to the economy
of the City.
Definition of Economic and Tax Impact
The construction and subsequent operation of the Project will create important benefits
within Greater Miami. These benefits include new income, new jobs, new tax revenues
and new economic activity impacting upon every sector of the local economy. Moreover,
through the multiplier effect of respending and reinvesting, indirect economic benefits are
added to the direct benefits brought about by initial construction expenditures and the
expenditures from ongoing operations.
BRICKELL BAY VILLAGE - Economic Impact Study January 7, 1999
Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. Pa9 e 3
*JJ-J:�
INTRODUCTION, OBJECTIVES AND DEFINITIONS
Direct and indirect Effects
The total economic impact of public and private projects and policies on a region do not
end with the impact from the initial construction expenditures; the continued benefits to the
local economy must also be considered. Income to firms furnishing construction materials
and services is subsequently converted into employee salaries, material purchases,
investment in plant and equipment, savings, profits, purchases of services, and a variety
of other economic activities. income to laborers is subsequently respent for purchases of
food, housing, transportation, entertainment, education, medical and dental services,
clothing, personal services, and a wide variety of other goods and services.
Furthermore, income to governmental units is respent as salaries, purchases, and support
of a variety of programs, including education, transportation, and social services. In turn,
individuals, firms, and governments furnishing these goods and services again spend their
income for more purchases, salaries, investments, and savings. In this manner, indirect
benefits result each time the initial sum is respent, and the additional sum available in the
local economy induces further job creation, business development and savings.
Quantification of these indirect benefits has been the object of considerable economic
study. Because economic relationships are so complex in our modern society, no single
area or political unit is a completely self-contained economic unit. Therefore, purchases
from other areas and political units are necessary, and goods and services are exported
in return. As purchases are made from other units, some of the benefits of economic
respending are lost to the local economy. Ultimately, a smaller and smaller portion of the
initial sum would remain, until, after several rounds of respending, an insignificant sum is
left.
The indirect effects can be viewed as a set of "ripples" in the economy. Indirect, like direct,
resources require labor, materials, equipment and services for their production to induce
further job creation and spending of wages.
BRICKELL BAY VILLAGE - Economic Impact Study January 7, 1999
Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. Page 4
S f'
-
0 o
INTRODUCTION, OBJECTIVES AND DEFINITIONS
The "ripple" impact of the indirect effect multiplies the original impact of the purchase. The
common measure of the magnitude of the "ripple" effect is called a multiplier. A multiplier
measures the total magnitude of the impact on each particular economic indicator as a
multiple of the initial, direct effect. For instance, a multiplier of I" would signify no "ripple"
effects as the total impact is 1 times the initial impact, while a multiplier of "2" would imply
that the total impact is 2 times the direct effect.
The actual magnitude of a multiplier depends on the likelihood the goods and services
purchased in a region would be produced in, or provided from the region.
The model we used to estimate the total economic impact incorporates a multiplier
developed by utilizing past consumption and production patterns in the City.
Measures of Economic Impact
Various measures can be used to indicate the impact of a policy or project on a region.
Specifically, for this study, they are the changes (increases) in local employment, wages,
tax revenue and output that result. Definitions of these measures are as follows:
• Em looyment is measured in full -time -equivalent jobs.
• Wages include wages, salaries, and proprietors income only. They may
include non -wage compensation, such as pensions, insurance, and other
fringe benefits. Wages are assumed to be expended by households in the
area at which the wage-earner resides.
• Local taxes include additional revenues from both ad valorem and non ad
valorem assessments.
BRICKELL BAY VILLAGE - Economic Impact Study January 7, 1999
Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. Page 5
4
INTRODUCTION, OBJECTIVES AND DEFINITIONS
Measures of Economic Impact (Continued)
• Direct Expenditurea include those sums expended for land acquisition, site
preparation and all hard and soft costs associated with the project.
• Indirect Expenditures are those sums expended within the local economy as
a result of the "ripple" effect described earlier.
• Ou- W describes total economic activity, and is essentially equivalent to the
sum of direct and indirect expenditures (exclusive of wages and taxes).
Description of Results
For the purpose of describing the total economic benefits of the Project, the related
expenditures have been broken into two categories:
(1) Development
(2) Operational
Development it expenft gyres include those expenditures related to the design and
construction phase of the Project and related amenities.
Op�erati nal expenditures are those expenditures incurred in connection with the ongoing
operation of the apartment complex.
BRICKELL BAY VILLAGE - Economic Impact Study January 7, 1999
Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A.
Page6
v
C
BRICKELL BAY VILLAGE
THE PROJECT OVERVIEW
v S � - *1-). 6 1
PROJECT OVERVIEW
0
The Project
The Project consists of a 29 story building with approximately 420 Luxury High-rise
apartment units. It is located at 2101 - 2105 Brickell Avenue, Miami, Florida 33131,
Construction is expected to commence in August, 1999. The construction period is
expected to be 16 months., with occupancy in late 2000.
BRIO CELL BAY VILLAGE - Economic Impact Study
Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. January 7, 1999
Page 7
S 561
BRICKELL BAY VILLAGE
DISCUSSION OF THE RESULTS OF THE ANALYSIS
O�- 561
JOWL
DISCUSSION OF THE RESULTS OF THE ANALYSIS
Impact Indicators
We measured the project's impact on four commonly -used indicators of economic activity.
Those indicators are:
• Jobs
• Wages
• Total output
• Local taxes
Results of Indicators
The economic indicator most commonly measured, and publicly reported on to gauge the
economic impact of a public project is output. The impact of a project on the indicator
P-QW-ul is often referred to as the project's econo is impact.
Exhibits I - III detail the Project's direct and indirect impact on the above economic
indicators for Greater Miami. A summary of such impact follows:
Development, One -Time
Employment
Wages 9
Output
Taxes Total
Direct
224
$13,300,000
$50,773,90
Indirect
$64,073,907
Total Development Impact
224
$13,300,000
40,763,147
$91,537,054
40,763,147
Operational Annual
$104,837,054
Direct
Indirect
10
$760,000
$1,575,00
$1,765,303 $4,100,303
Total Operationallmpact
1,384,740
1,384,740
10
$760,000
$2,959,74
$1,765,303 $5,485,043
BRICKELL BAY VILLAGE - Economic Impact Study
Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. January 7, 1999
Page 8
6)
DISCUSSION OF THE RESULTS OF THE ANALYSIS
Impact of Construction:
The site preparation and construction expenditures, including soft costs, estimated at $47
million, within Greater Miami would create approximately 200 new full time equivalent jobs
and a maximum of 250 workers employed during peak periods. The workers will earn
approximately $13 million in wages. These jobs will primarily be in the construction,
transportation and related service industries.
Spending for site preparation and project construction will result in a total estimated impact
of $88 million dollars, excluding marketing and financing costs.
Impact of Ongoing Operations
As a result of the on -going operation of the apartment complex, Greater Miami will gain
approximately 10 new, permanent, full-time equivalent jobs. The workers who obtain these
Positions will earn approximately $760 thousand annually.
The total expenditures for the Project's operations will provide a new, permanent impact of
$3.7 million annually to the City's economy. This impact consists of the effects of the direct
multiplied effects of such spending thus creating indirect benefits. expenditures from the maintenance and security of the apartment complex, as well as the
Impact on Local Tax Revenues
As a result of the construction and operation of the Project, various state, county, and city
governments and agencies would gain an estimated annual tax benefit of $1.8 million. The
specific entities receiving these tax revenues are shown on page 14.
S� 6r".61
E
N
(o
BRICKELL BAY VILLAGE
DISCUSSION OF RESULTS BY ECONOMIC INDICATOR
DISCUSSION OF RESULTS BY ECONOMIC INDICATOR
Our analysis of the economic nomic and tax benefits of the Project was done by each major phase
of the project. We identified the major phases to be development and operations. This
analysis determines the economic benefits to the City by identifying such benefits for each
of the phases. The effect on economic indicators used to measure benefits (employment,
wages, output and taxes) were computed for each phase.
Employment
Employment is one of the most important economic benefits of the development. It is one
of the most accessible and direct benefits for the City's residents and is a primary means by
which development, operations and maintenance expenditures generate indirect economic
benefits. A portion of this employment occurs on -site in the form of short-term development
and marketing activity, and a portion is longer term employment derived from on -going
operations. Further employment is generated off -site by expenditures of the business owners
and office wokers in area businesses.
As can be seen in Exhibit I, total short term (Developmental) employment will average 224
employees over a 16 month period and the total on -going employment will average 10. The
total on -going positions can be summarized as follows
• Leasing Staff
• Management
• Security/Police & Parking
• Maintenance and Clean -Up
From statistical data obtained from the Tourism Department, spending in the City is classified
into various expenditure categories. These include:
• Eating/Drinking Grocery
• Auto Rental
Other Transportation
• Service Station •
Recreation
• Retail
Aft
BRICKELL BAY VILLAGE - Economic Impact Study
Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. January 7, 1999
�y �� Jj I Page 10
..4..- �a!lr:
DISCUSSION OF RESULTS BY ECONOMIC INDICATOR
Although it is known that these e expenditures will be made, an the interest of conservatism, we
did not include same in this report. We took this approach because we believe it would be
difficult to contend that a majority of the occupants of this Project will come from out of town
rather than other parts of Greater Miami.
Wages
The computation of wages are a direct by-product of employment. As discussed in the above
section, both on -site and off -site jobs are created. These jobs were both temporary and
permanent in nature.
To compute the wages associated with the new employment we started with budgeted data
directly related to the development and operations of the Project.
Employment created, such as construction related employment, was obtained directly from
construction estimates. These numbers were tested for reasonableness.
Output
Total output generated as a result of the development and operations of the Project is caused
by the following type of expenditures.
• Developer cost expended in the City (100%)
• Annual operational expenditures of mapagement company
• New spending in Greater Miami by office workers, visitors, employees
and business owners
Exhibit 11 shows a summary of the development cost expended in Greater Miami and of
operational expenditures made in relation to the on -going maintenance of the Project. Exhibit
IV gives a detailed breakdown of the development costs.
DISCUSSION OF RESULTS BY ECONOMIC INDICATOR
Output
To incorporate the impact of dollars being respent and/or reinvested in the City, a multiplier
was applied to total direct output. A multiplier of 1.8792 was used to determine total direct and
indirect output created by the Project. This multiplier indicates that for every $100 spent in
Greater Miami, another $87.92 will be respent or reinvested in Greater Miami. This multiplier
was obtained from the Dade County Planning Department.
Direct output from the development phase of the Project is primarily a result of developer
costs. This cost consists of land acquisition and site preparation, soft and hard costs which
includes construction. To determine•the total direct output we determined what development
cost specifically was expected to be or had been spent in Greater Miami.
Total direct output exclusive of wages during the development phase is $51 million. Total
indirect output created by the direct respending in Greater Miami is $41 million. Thus total
E Greater Miami Output from the development of the Project is $92 million.
The final component of output results from the direct operating expenditures of the residential
units and the indirect benefits created as a result of the multiplier effect on direct output.
The Developer provided us with an annual operating budget for the Project. An overall
assumption was made that all expenditures would be spent initially in the City. The total
operating expenditures incorporate all estimated expenses of operation of the Project except
for wages. The impact of wages was measured separately'as an economic indicator.
To incorporate the potential respending and reinvesting in Greater Miami, the multiplier effect
was measured. By applying a multiplier of 1.8792 to the total direct output from operating
expenditures, we determined total output (direct and indirect) from on -going operating
expenditures.
BRICKELL BAY VILLAGE - Economic Impact Study January 7, 1999
Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. 5 Page 12
DISCUSSION OF RESULTS BY ECONOMIC INDICATOR
Total direct output created from operating expenditures is $1.6 million. Total indirect output
created from operating expenditures is $1.4 million. Total output created from ongoing
operations is $3.0 million.
Local Taxes
A key and significant benefit generated from the development and operation of the Project
is taxes. Several types of tax revenue will be generated from this project including both ad
valorem and other taxes. Specific ad valorem taxes include real and personal property
taxes. Other taxes include occupational taxes, resort taxes and community development
taxes.
New real property taxes will be assessed on the Project. The assessment is based on a
predetermined millage rate being applied to the taxable value of the real property. We
computed real property taxes for the development phase based on the cost of the
development of the project. This assessmen# base is very conservative since tax on real
property typically is assessed on appraised values and not cost. Cost was used in the place
of an estimated appraisal for conservatism. The basis for ongoing taxes is also overall cost.
The millage rate was obtained from the County Tax Collectors office relative to the Project's
location. Exhibit V shows the tax computation. The real property taxes expected to be
generated annually are approximately $1.8 million.
DISCUSSION OF RESULTS BY ECONOMIC INDICATOR
Total ad valorem taxes assessed by Dade County are allocated based on mileage rates to
certain governmental entities. Listed below is the allocation of projected tax revenue.
Although not quantified, Greater Miami, through its receipt of allocated state sales taxes
receive an additional benefit as a result of the development and operation of the project.
p
BRICKEu Rnv vn
Sharpton, Brunson & Company, rs impact Study
P.A. i
January 7, 1999
C Page 14
E
BRICKELL BAY VILLAGE
OTHER CONSIDERATIONS
So- 961
OTHER CONSIDERATIONS
Public Sector Costs
Given that a community has embarked on economic development which could involve
increases in permanent residents, a major concern is the proper balance between the public
sector revenues and the cost associated with the various forms this development may take.
Public policy might seek to enhance development with beneficial net effects on the public
sector, or at least avoid development having clearly adverse effects.
Some of the costs that must be considered are required increases in the following:
• Public Safety (police and fire) • Highways
• Health and Environmental Services Parks and Recreation
• Capital Improvements (Infra structure) • Schools
The objective of this report is not to measure the potential increases in public sector costs
that may result from the development and operations of this project. Nor was this report's
objective to compare the fiscal benefits with cost that may result from this project. Therefore
we will not attempt to quantify such factors. We did feel it was necessary to make mention
of certain potential fiscal costs that must be considered.
Impact Fees
A very significant factor in measuring the economic impact on a specific region of a project
are impact and other required development fees. When a development occurs in the region
being measured (Miami), specific fees must be paid to the region within which the
development is to occur. A summary of the fees are listed below:
• City of Miami Developmental Impact Fee • Administrative Fee
• City of Miami Developmental Admin Fee • Building Permit Fee
• Dade County School Impact Fee 0 Installation Energy Fee
• Other Fees
For the purpose of this economic impact analysis, fees are included as a part of the direct
development cost (output). Impact fees total approximately $1.5 million and other fees total
approximately $900 thousand. These fees are shown in detail in Exhibit VII.
BRICKELL BAY VILLAGE - Economic Impact Study January 7, 1999
Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. m �.� age 15
F1
BRICKELL BAY VILLAGE
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
v s) - r'! 4p
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
Based upon the preceding in-depth analysis of the Brickell Bay Village Project, it appears
that such a development can bring significant economic benefits to Greater Miami. This final
section reviews the results of the employment opportunities, public sector revenues and total
economic benefits on the City as a result of the development.
Employment
Total development phase employment will be approximately 224 and on -going annual
employment resulting from the maintenance of the Project will be approximately 10.
Tax Revenue
The analysis of public sector revenues associated with the development includes taxes and
other revenues generated directly by the project. Although public sector cost is a important
element in measuring fiscal impact, for purposes of this project such cost have not been
quantified. This analysis only measured the benefits derived from the project. Total tax
revenues expected to be created annually are $1.8 million.'
output
The analysis of total economic impact is measured by total output. This analysis measures
the economic impact of development cost and outgoing, operational expenditures. To
determine the effect of respending within Greater Miami, we utilized a multiplier to compute
total direct and indirect benefits. Total output expected to be generated as a result of the
development and operation of the project will approximate:
One Time $91,537,054
9r�r:�'4�Wh
EXHIBIT LIST
Exhibit I Summary of Economic Impact
Exhibit II Summary of all Direct Economic Benefits
Exhibit III Computation of Indirect Benefits
Exhibit IV Schedule of Project Development Cost
Exhibit V Schedule of Ad Valorem Taxes
Exhibit VI Allocation of Ad Valorem Taxes
Exhibit Vil Impact and Other Fees
F
a
BR IC (ELL BAY VILLAGE - Economic Impact Study
Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. January 7, 1999
Page 17
BRICKELL BAY VILLAGE
ECONOMIC BENEFITS STUDY
SUMMARY OF ECONOMIC IMPACT
a,
DIRECT �` � � � �� YYflSz� 1=MMPLOYNIFNT
;DEVELOPMENT
$50 773 907 $13 300,000
'OPERATIONAL _ 1 �f ' E: 224
1,575,000 760,000
d TOTAL DIRECT 4 10 $1,765,303
' $52, 348, 907 $14, 060, 000
INDIRECT �`Y = 234 $1,765,303
ZEVELOP(NIENT� f
*OPERATIOIVALr, r t i . $40,763,147
1,384,740
TOTAL IN T
$42 147 887
t� -T®is4L BENEFITS M
$94,496,794 $14 060 000
I 234 $1,765,303
X
2
W
BRICKELL BAY VILLAGE
ECONOMIC BENEFITS STUDY
SUMMARY OF DIRECT ECONOMIC BENEFITS
�J
I
E
m
X
W
0 0 0
BRICKELL BAY VILLAGE
ECONOMIC BENEFITS STUDY
SUMMARY OF OF INDIRECT BENEFITS
>'
TOTAL
APPLICABLE
COMPUTED
DESCRIPTION
t5
EXP 'NDITURF
MULTIPLIER
INDIRECT BENEFIT
Dll E PMIENT PHASE.. '
z ` a
$12,500,000
0.8792
$10,990,000
tSOFT'COST`
HARD'"COST°� r
8,033,000
0.8792
7,062,614
K
25,830,907
0.8792
22,710,533
TOTAL DEVELOPMENT` PHASE
h: r : , k
$46,363,907
0.8792
$40,763 147
a
OPERATIONALPHASE
$1,575,000
0.8792
$1,384,740
TOTAL INDIRECT BENEFITS
$47,938,907
0.8792
$42,147.887
m
X
E-1-11
m
u
O
EXHIBIT IV
BRICKELL SAY VILLAGE
ECONOMIC BENEFITS STUDY
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT COST
-/o SPENT IN
TYPE OF OST
D-AQF=
AMQ=
HARb;.`, COSTS!-',`�:-e'---
BASE, BUILDING '..P.ARKINd.*;,.,:..Iti�.-i:�l_.,-.*.
100%
$36,120,000
lm,P,P�CT�:,FEES
100%
12,500,000
ti
100%
1,490,761
CONTINGENCIES100%
920,146
100%
500,000
,HARD"Off
OTAL!`qE
100%
$51,530,907
907
R Z
100%
8,033,000
000
FINANd INGWmARKETING
G
100%
6
$59,563,907
3 9 0 7
' 5
9
100%
1 6 4
$164,000
0 0 0
IN
.,
FINA CING ,C0'STS"'?A-Nb"' FEES
"FEES'.
E$64,073,907
INTEREST'
100%
1
$1,816,000
TOTAL , FINANCINGCOST
100%
0 0
0 0
2,530,000
$ 6 0
$4,346, 00
'666
TOTAL PROJECT bd
100%
'o g
U4 73 07
f-
0901 — 561
0
E
BRICKELL BAY VILLAGE
ECONOMIC BENEFITS STUDY
COMPUTATION OF AD VALOREM TAXES
DESCRIPTION
Ongoing
DEVELOPED "-'PROJ.
$46,563,907
ILLAGE TAX RATE ,
29.8880
'k;M
COMPUTED ' -"TAXO'V
$1,391,703
XT
-VALU89--.,
MR
$12,500,00o
tiMILLAGEy}TAX-RATE ,121,
N'r
29.8880
�R'r--COMPUTED O/Ek ,fie
,m in f j
X
$373,600
$1,765,303
Does not include contingencies.
EXHIBIT V
r")
BRICKELL BAY VILLAGE
ECONOMIC BENEFITS STUDY
ALLOCATION OF AD VALORUM TAXES
EXHIBIT VI
APPLICABLE
ANNUAL
TAXES
miu-6aE
BASIS
IAX
10.0000
$59,063,907
1
$590.640
9.1820
$59,063,907
542,326
6.0230
$59,063,907
355.742
1.7900
$59,063,907
105,724
0.8370
$59,063,907
49,436
0.5970
$59,063,907
35,261
0.3340
$59,063,907
19,727
0.9780
$59,063,907
57,765
0.0470
$59,063,907
2,776
0.1000
$59,063,907
5,906
29.8880
$59,063,907
$1,766,303
v�- 261
BRICKELL BAY VILLAGE
ECONOMIC BENEFITS STUDY
IMPACT AND OTHER FEES
IMPACT AND OTHER FEES
A Development Square Footages:
1) ,Total gross building area (excluding balconies)
2) Maximurii deVelopment;area (FAR)
f Netapartment,area .
B. Impact Fees:
Total of all Fees for
Note: Fees above were calculated using information obtained from
the City of Miami Planning, Building and Zoning Department,
October 26, 1998.
EXHIBIT VII
855,615
504,040
424,431
266.832
Grr•
$438,044
13,141
646,456
393,120
1,490,761
$587,160
168,096
77,312
25,000
30,000
18,060
3,866
7,520
1,397
1,425
60
250
35
2,410,907
09- 561
a 0
E
s
The Information Management C'omPany
305-477-9149.800-287-4799 • FAX 305-477-7526
' RN +raT1
K wu tLf'
hx77 PM"Iw r7lvacur
I"" mom
Cisro•MY
[ w ."+TLC'.
�a
m
CIE
•I
Kr W. - 1S7
KII. lM! . Tld
S MY.. ft3
V
Symbol Legend
®
artw.r WNW INffaxr
6tm otxr7T PCIB
a
Rrlrll.l+cm!
—.._
CMODt6WWV cc LM
-�-
rRaOlG7tMM SAtR SUER /R?'',
—.�-
l6R1ER000MM -MR Mr
;RtTYD f/1' oION PFE j
�r✓R'1GixwJ (-_
�'f�
� —
p ♦I
�lB1IN�
s
rraos•
TxAwo I
s' SXW
N
4f
0
U
(TrPRJ t
1-
a
Fowo .raw P1Pr O+ CCNCRE7E RaS .wi
iw
1Ho aatrrtrAtxR)
"w B So C><" M« I M1sw rar..f4' srwre/'M M. w.Pwf7
.roan tww.n a.6 M« Mr..6u.. pens wale i acw«. ro
b,. Mt d n6• l...IIOp.. ! /7APRiCiP fy1N67' Mbw It.
nr..b M. lFda.. T.«.i.« SfaMad. w M f.a. T 7-
Phb * AOo.. d Si...lw...O T.rN.r..r CM«w 6t617-6,
Fib.iM A4n"ru0iP0•e CUM.
ai-
William O. High
P.0-4n.r !av Sa..rw Mn .SM
$LOB ( fle+f.a
&M Ca""
R462R COMWET£ taCR - RY PROP. Lor I AaMCM 7 SMw
ULYf IOV1 T VAPo£5) KJT(6ti6 .
GKS
. S7WY MARAVl 81*,D Y
(PAMR4l:7RV COREIP am)
10
!04W MSK ft" M' MiS - 23.11
LO6rR Lnn PAWM flOOR 0"... 117?
. STO#r AAlR71 w B *Dm
(Atgwc grliRYER Law
LO*W fMShrR R" PT MIS . 2117
EO UM PAKVC flOOR EUY... IIM
6' 0H t
of
Biscayne Bay
1l----_---.----..--------_•
t
i
tt
t
t
t
�
� 7;7l0� SiR7nmcAJxLj 4 '
t
G'iKR RAr
11
_ .fY
�
�
� A6PKYT PA9R�W tDT
\) t
1 fx1GF1i' � t
3 t
PM
Biscap1e Bay
RR
Poac d
Y� t
� t
& t
c.!
y'iEr AvM++lT nAreoRc !Rr
tOXWM
flit
1
�MAM60(PM Fa
�
r
1
t
7
srA"r`
t
t
fn6.o oKlr. /67r'
1
Legal Description Surveyor's Notes
!nh 6S eM 66. Qbe4 a d nAarR oe.welFp t. fM PM M.r..l r rw.rMO
r) 8.a.4r� an e..+s a. M. Mf�GY d Beltiv.f Ar�.i.
e PM 4.w R « P.q. •• d M. P.M RwroNs d GwY C_(r. PIwNAr. l.prrMr
wiA . Ae'T7.. d 6q •4!^..« ro ra. t.h ai
«MN tw�tta S77SOY.M:
?) EA•efb•sA
exf ..w. P."!'=vim hoes;
Ay6.�. H fE�Y,A�ib
'6E' 6.w
REGN « M. moat MrrMrfj e.mw d dw..e. Lot 6S; Mwe. twI S677o'7. W,
aMy Ors Mronvf.ry fnt .l .d6 [.h f5 mr0 of f s . OW— d IOROO I-f ro
M.+r.. S77'o9Y6'
FA d D.
? ; 6b.. Tb.d EAroear N!A (nlrnaOrM. d Pt+su' Dom)
PI'!'r0 m. .bq [l�. SwAAw.fwy Danrbry d t.M 056
J) !M. aurv.' h .« mM wWas R Dwrt 17�. 6
s.c6.rr .RO f�fs O6Hwrw d 7JZ69 !wt h a P.f.l d bW-
d t6. .vrggr;
h PM lOw4 74. « pm. 1 d 8w PoOt d Obioir Cant', F-fdu M_ M
N.I76:Jo'C, otwq iad AJihwO
!iu tw . tlPNmd .r .7Rt96 l.N ro . Po4d d
hrur.efb..R6 w SaOMo.tw.j. a.o./s6.rr r Mr RartA...nry law,a r .rMr d
aa.0 Lf 6S: Marc. M M77of a6Y, py.q Mr NaMrrvtefy f.. d bf fS
o.
MZ dW w«arOsRmr tw a d t tk !. tl�r x2 fY'
6E8PMM' S)a0 WiOTDM PM.f a! bW mnfgrmr/ J1Y..6T t.u.nl h.f (177 ave
--------- Ba------
Btscapne y — — — — — —
Brickell Avenue
SN
68 67 aREXal. PLgCE
L7
1
t
Biscayne Bay
b
4
Tnn Ht c7r 0 x. Ct7 1
A P A R T M E
POINT DEVELOPMENT
COR.POR.ATION
1110 BRFCKEL,L AVENUE, SUM 303
WAMI, FLORIDA 33131
WOLEBERRG ALVAREZ
AND PARTNERS
ARCHITECTURE - ENGINEERING -
PLANNING - INTERIOR DESIGN
5960 S.W. 57TH AVENUE
AGAN1I, FLORIDA 33143
N T S
M.U.S.P. (MAJOR -USE SPECIAL PERMIT) SUBMITTAL
DDDDi7A'DAT AtL innn ,... ...... .
24'-6"
0
it
I
"x 4"Pressure Treated
70
2"x 4"Gra5s Bearing o
12" — ......
Scale @ 1 /4"=1 '
* 100 sq. Ft.
Sign'
ate 01-21-99
cafe: (Voted Brickell Bay Village
wg. # 99-116 Miami, Fi
heet 2 of 2
Drawn by: Mandel R. Rodriguez.
Sales: Chet
1/2"1
THM .NEON ANO swnv N T"tLy At�11tq�N
TM� r�erNTT er Aeea� a euue�
VN�Ttp AEON Ceti ANC ANO A NeT
V< VNO �N WNOLS e! BN rA� q�T!"pVr
WA RCTVAtN .ft N rvWMM.I.M wftwv A" Wo
Ae ►�eMRLT YrON O! WOq
CO iYf4eMaft - OM e1 N�eOTtAm.". CM
YR AelN Te ACCCrT A wwA
ONAjWLR CN v LWY10e R TN! COt
oBAneN Pon MTfY `" er'AA n
T TNts
ATATMM09 NAY. ACCOMC A *YT er IM.
•AVTCN TO %vin T R M ATTACNNI.
!d
_
-
O
Sete Plan.
CUSTOMERAPPROV,qL
DATE / / 98
CJ NCT Af Ci
N�F.4Mf �30'Sj 362-3'333
MIp M►, FL. 331 �'2
C,
7`-
Sign,A,'
Scale: NTS
Note: Copy and Colors to be determined
'I ''7 ate 91-21-99
Scale: Noted
Dwg. * 99-116
Sheet 1 of 2
Brickell Bay Village
Miami, Fl
8'-0„
vi dm l Uy: Manuel h. hoarlguez.
Sales: Chet
. x 2 x 3I Aluminum Frame
)63 ALUMINUM RETURNS
H!0 LAMPS ON 12"C'S
390 ROUTED ALUMINUM FACE
BALLAST & IN -LINE FUSE
5" Pipe
#12 WIRE(THHN, THWN)
-20 AMP.
IISCONNECT SWITCH
Site pton
FANEL C- ACRY R. FCR 200 AMPS.
FANEL LOAa 120 AMPS
1 GENERAL LIGHT 5 GENERAL LIGHT
2 6
3 ' T r r
a y
MWEL A, 16 $GU-SPEA M R. FOR
20 MAPS.
iALLUECTNICALCOMPONENTSANEO.i:URM
510N GROUNDED ACCONOINCTO NEC 25U
dT< SSA THE ABPs
AU SNOWSANU MMO DEVICES SMU SE
menEFIED ATTINEOFiNSiAIiA',fON
AL EIECTNICAL WININOAND DISMAILKnUIF
SNAU COMM WnITREPROWSIONS OFTNE
SOVIN ROBIN 00NDI1110 CODE CNAPTERS 42:
43, 44; AND 45 ARTiC1E 60O AND ANY ANU AU
ARnCLESOFTHECURRENTNIHIGMEIECi IC
CODE:
PRIMARY WINING AS PER NEC 600=21
1I41NE FUSE NEWID. AS PER SFOC 4565A
GROUNDING BONDING OFSIGN AS PER
NEC 259 SERVICE RISCONNECTAS PER
NEC 60O-2AIL ELEC, COMPONENFS
B.L. LISTED PER NEC 600-4
NOTE: UNLESS OTNERWISESPECIRERALL
STEELTOREASTMA-35ALL201ITSTUBE
A-367
ALE WELDING TO BE1/0' AI@1 AND BE
DONE UNDER THE DIBECiSUPEBVISION'
OFA CEBTRER WELBER..
vN�f lff�eN .Ntl fl.reN vino. lfNY�N
aNw /!e/fgTf or weeua o eautl.
CUSTOMER APPROVAL
�0G 0' BL W-1� E
YNrrftl f�oN e0. ANC Asps fort NOT
E
!f Yfftl �N WNO<f Q! �N /f1li M1RNOtlr
Wq�TTtN /f!MlfWON. fq.1CN fN.LL qq
i:i nffTe�
HTYlNftl /gOJNI�� Y/ON O! gf/Oq/f
!O/Yl►�![f�ON OI iL.001�.T/OND Oq
etlfrew�a w�lfff rs .eef/rwlus-
.—
— — — — — — — ---_--_—
I MtAMt =30g� 362-333:
oN.lf. eNAe�r a.vts v vNf seww
I
' P.O_ BOX 52Z ^S Z 7
OgATfON f0! gfTiMi�ON oI fwMq TM�O
M' FA M f , F (-. 33 i 52
r�
198'
_17
7—T-7—
ALI
p1rl��it�__ _ j��itV.�iliiiilMii���., �%rooi'°"..f�•��;���o
NNINAS
01" EEE
VAA
lie
41 - -milk
I ho'� Le �_-A
— W�. .9 PAML ON.
1-_XMMG
TREE LEGEND
-
-
NO.
C r"CIN NAME -
CAL.
WEIGHT
REMARKS
NC
COMMC.TI NAME
CAL.
WEIGWi
-
.. :. -... .. .
REIMAlaC4
1
I OCO3WT PALM
D-
3b'
TO BE RELOCATED
2.
COCONUT PALM
O•
TO BE REEVED
A3
fil!"IDO LFIBO
- 3"
3S'
TO.., -.
3.
COCONUT PAL-1
#^
TO BE RELOCATED
44.
OIJrBO LRBO
3C
TO REMAIN.
A.
COCONUT PALM
COCONUT p
O^
30
30'
TO DE RELOCATED
[).
46.
(AY'BO LR1D0
CAMEO LFIBO
MJI
MLTI
12^
35'
33'
TO REMAIN
TO REMAIN I
5•
PALM
PALM
O
a-
25'
25'
TO BE RELOCATED
TO BE RELOCATED
Al.
PALM
p^
70'
TO BE 1®'MOVEp
M.
'L
BLACK C
BLACK OLIVE
O"
70'
TO BE REMOVED
Aa.
GOueLE R'(AMT DATE PALM
DOUBSABALE
- T
TO DE REMOvCD
e
BLACK OLIVE
A^
15•
TO BE REMOVED
AS
PYGMY DAME PALM
3•
T'
r0 Be R!!X'IOVED
S
CCCgati PALM
O'
TO BE IQ7'MOVED
�,
COUBLE PTCJMT DATE PALM
O'
TO BE RCPk)VED
IQ.
COCONUT PALM
b^
O'
TO BE IaHMOMrm
51.
DOUBLE ALEVVIPDER PAJM
S'
TO DE REMOVED
0.
COCOilT -4-m
6-
b'
TO BE REMOVED
S7.
ALIDMMCGR PALM
3•
7S'
TO BE I17E'OVED
a.
COCONUTPALM
Y
1D BC RlSIOVED
b3,
DOUBLE ALEXANDER PA tM
25'
TO BE REMCVEO
D
COCONUT PALM
IC^
m'
TO DE REMOVED
54.
ALEXANDER PALM
3"
1.
TO BE REMOVED
N
CCCCWT PALM
6"
70•
TO BE RELOCATED
55.
56.
ALEXANDER PALM
FICUS TREE
3"
3
75'
AV
TO BE REMOVED
TO BE REMOVEO
B.
DOUBLE PALM DATE PALM
l'
TO DE REMOVED
51.
DER PALM
5'•
B•
TO BE REMOVED
Ib.
SIN LE PT(AMT DATE PALM
[^
6'
TO BE REMOVED
Sa.
FICUSALEXT
RCW TREE
5'
S0'
TO BE PEMOVED
M.
BLADE CLIVE
6-
20'
TO BE REMOVED
n
G l DO CIL151A TREE
TO BE REMpVEp
B.
COCONUT PALM
6-
IS'
TO BE RELOCATED
60.
PEST TREE
TO BE REMOVED
K
COCcHat PALM
b"
25'
TO BE Fzp OOAlED
6l
ALEXANDER PALM
3^
20'
TO BE REMOVED
20.
BLALK OLIVE
W
30.
TO BE REMOVED
67.
PEST TREE
TO BE REMOVED
2L
FICL4 TREE
MULTI
30'
TO BE REMOVED
63
PEST TREE
TO DE REMOVE
22.
FICL* T17EE
MULTI
30'
TO BE REMOVED
64,
aJEEN PALM
6"
35'
RET
TO DE IOVEp
23.
Ft= TREE
MLTI
30'
TO Be REMOVED
6S.
QUEEN PALM
b-
30'
TO BE REMOVED
2q
PICU`5 71r:E
MULTI
30.
TO BE REMOVED
66.
PETREE
TO USE REMOVED
25.
FIC:S TREE
MLLTI
30'
TO BE REMOVED
67.
POINCIANA
1.
40'
TO BE RETIOVw
26,
P= TREE
MLTI
30'
TO BE REMOVED
66
POINCIANA
10'
Al'
TO BE REMOVED
21
FlCJa TREE
MULTI
30'
TO BE REMOVED
61
PONCIANA
6^
30'
TO BE REMOVED
ia.
FICS TIME
MULTI
30'
TO DE REMOVED
T0.
POINCIANA
b"
30'
TO BE REMOVED
2-1
Ras TIME
TMILTI
30'
TO BE REMOVED
TL
POINCIANA
1;.
40'
TO BE REMOVED
30.
SABAL PALM
a"
30'
TO REMAN
72
PONCIANA
6"
10'
TO BE REMOVED
3L
SADAL PALM
a"
30'
TO REMAIN
13.
PEST TREE
TO BE REMOVED
32
SABAL PALM
IF,
W.
TO REMAIN
Ma.
ALEXANDER PALM
1"
20'
TO BE REMOVED
35-
5ASAL PALM
L"
I5'
TO RE3MAN
-w
PONCIANA
IO•
35'
TO BE REMOVED
34.
SABAL PALM
p•
30'
TO ROMAN
16.
POW;ANA
10"
40'
TO BE REMOVED
35.
5ADAL PALM
D'
30'
TO BE RELOCATED
'M.
PONCIANA
1"
40'
TO BC REMOVED
36.
SABAL PALM
a'
25•
TO DE RELOCATED
is.
ALEXANDER PALM
2"
30'
TO BE REMOVED
31.
SADAL PALM
a"
25'
TO BE RELOCATED
T1
GUMBO LIIMBO
7
S0'
TO BE RELOCATED
36
SABAL PALM
a"
25'
To BE RELOCATED
a0,
(MMBO LPBO
2-
50'
TO BE RELOCATED
SABAL PALM
a"
25'
TO BE RELOCATED
Dt.
SABAL PALM
4-
40'
TO BE REMOVED
A&
SABAL PALM
a"
30'
TO BE RELOCATED
62.
SABAL PALM
A"
A0'
TO BE REMOVED
41
FRCS TREE
3`
35'
TO BE REMOVED
5!
OAK TREE
r
25'
RE
TO BE MOVED
47
PONCIANA
70.
4C
TO BE RELOCATED
oi
EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN
PWTECTICN for EXISTING TIaES TO IaMAN
MIDT TO KALE
NOTES:
1• LOCATIIv1V6 AND SIZES OF EXISTMG PLANT
MATERIAL ARE APPROXIMATE
2. MITIGATION PLAN WLL BE PQOVIDED AS
PART OF MUSP APPLICATION.
-�oei6 Rr.
U.a4rr�ne.+a- '
R W Ali'
N
-5B
g
A%;t
H
3 it
li
3
<
a
Q
o
t
0
N
ISSUE DATE
.." MIDI
EXISTR16I04WORS
iM+EET RDI.eEIr
r r-1 L EX. -I
MOF/
I I I I I F
®,
r
A
.0
a
. q,
TOWER BUILDING SECTION
SCALE: i'= W-0'
sxm'a��eLx
PODIUM BUILDING SECTION �yy501
SCALE: t'= 30'-0' A. '_
WUOR-USE SPECGL PERAAi DRAWINGS suem AL 2/4/49 1
TWO BEDROOM UNIT
Vy SCAM- 1/4"=1'-D"
BONE BEDROOM UNIT
V SCAl!:1/4"=l'-O'
11YU iihllHUU,41 UfVI'1' ��OYE BEDROOM UNIT
SCAIE:I/4"=1'-D" (SIMHAR TO UNITS B. S. H. 1. L) SCAff1/4'=L'-O' (SIMILAR TO UNITS E. F. G. N. M. P, p)
A J
R 01 11 M
KEY PLAN
SCALE:I'-40'
NOTE: CALCULATIONS OF UNIT AREA ARE 13ASED ON THE FOLLOWING:
1. OUTER FACE OF EXTERIOR WALLS
2. OUTER FACE OF COMMON WALLS. SEPARATING UNIT AND COMMON AREA
3. CENTERLINE OF DEMISING TENANT WALL
�ONEBEDROOM UNIT SSTUDIO UNIT
SCAIEa/4"=1'-0" SCATE:!/4"=l'-0"
i a �
THREE BEDROOM UNIT
SCAL.E:1/+"=L'-O"
STUDIO UNIT
MAJOR -USE SPECIAL PERMIT ORAWINC,:�IrAL 2/A 0 f
41
W
1T
ua.t.q•R IJ►�
R IJOIR
ROlfl4•'
7?3 w
S'
?ma,
CAM FRE -AW
•EG4-8!
p•l•FR ,111E
MARGEDFLOGRmi
A3.04
E
x m- m-:r -Ir -Ir s-Id• m-,r •; -' .,r -,r .,r 1 2r-r-
i I I
(liz�,\ TYPICAL RESIDENTIAL PLAN
``� SCAM tits-=t°-o-
�'�
Q Q � �
Q Q
Q
•
n-,r
sx
»•x
:r-,r rr r a-,r
m-,r rr-,r
a-,c n-r
.,r -,r
m.,T -a•
'-1�--mot"-•--{------�-•-.}-_.�.
r
r-- _ 4—
— — — —T
��L--_"'I' — =_—
---
- --- ------
--
trQ
ss �
�
I
�
4
I
I
I
I
• T
I
tmluawear
�' • ro
I I
�4•
- - --
-- --
- St01YL
'1- 1 --
e
-j---
I
-
I
I
¢--
_
I
---------
'-4—_-
-_� __�_-_ ___-,+-__ _ ___�___ •_-.• __- I I I
I I I aa16 1 { I I I
III ♦� I
-
_—•--.---�. l3
I ;� I I I
♦ I 1
I I
I
_
(Q) MEZZANINE
PLAN
lAnK
MAJOR—USE SPECIAL PERMIT ORAWINGS SUBMfiTAL 2/4/99 or
I -- co
I77''lll::.t
I if-Ir
Z.-
------- 7kT
(9 PARKING PLAN (P-
SCAU:
TYPICAL PARKING PLAN (P-1 - P-4)
SCALE:
-04
Yll;
I CW Xf M
,um-w
ou
FLOW FW
SHEET ""U"mt, A3.02
MAJOR —USE SPECIAL PERMIT DRAWINGS SUBMITTAL 2/4/99
ar
f
im
------ ------- ----- -
PA
4 1 OALUR 1.1 11.
- - - - - - 4W U- - - - - - - -- a - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
TF
Y I %
r —
- - - - - - - J-1 - '1A. -- r
(� LOBBY PLAN
scaE-
X
('C') BASEMENT PLAN
�& SCALE:
9
7
ro
ro
MAJOR -USE SPECIAL PERMIT 0RrN?S SUSMITI�
�a
ISO
d
X
A30f-W
FLOOR PLANS
Spur NUUKR
A3.01'
'CALL I
-------- Or.—Dr-3
t t:i.
F
— -- — -- — -- — --
3 wr c,
4(.*K_11-kVlX(; DE'r.ml. Iva
- -------- :37 1 -1
}{��y1':I�'�'I
�ii� I 1
�i
��
(��
i
I .
(II'i'lli�
III ' �� II
I)
.
,,
��
;i
7
HE NCII DETAIL 'BOLLAR'D DETAIL LIGHT POLE - DE - TAll,
--T'.�FALF: -1/4 �SCALF3/h 1' 0'
CO.--916PE.WVMAQ
.6,_ a CE."
�EDIERWTEA��
a XT4 2-03
COa =S.T
E=K R.UK4
ILL —))I, "I
TENNis COUTT LIGEITIVG DETAJkL C.1L4K
MAJOR -USE SPECIAL PERMIT DRAININGS S BMIITAL 2/4./99
I�tQi-PBt
SHEET NUMBER
A1.03
E
R
9
W,
(Q\ CONTEXT PLAN
11�2) scat£: t'= 30-0'
won rarn�w onw.ro now on a wrr �x tmws
I
w Yes s ww wr
w�w��es
�3yEy=.
S�a�tR
a4
60
rt 0
a!j
:M
IraMr'
r4 �
rw4
.0. O
Ott ntow
•101•10
on** int
tGMiEiT OGN
S14EETRIIYRER-
A1.02
MAJOR —USE SPECIAL PERMIT DRAWINGS SUBMITTAL 2/4/99 �
i
T
iI I'rl,
� � , qI��
.0
X�x
Fj
/ZZ,
SITE PI
'. SHEEt NUMBER
WOR—USE SPECOL PERMIT DRAWINGS SUBMRTAL 2j4J99 �' r
x. v s :i i31 o
m
UA ![l A
aigit-v-av
E
ZONING PLAN
SCAM1-=60•-0"
(Q� LOT AREA PLAN
SCALE:l-=60•-0'
un 94
eltm Er
aRm[s
=L rffimIQ. 4�/fttr ✓icy
a er...Yk+ n.ur. YrruY y • iYww r rrr rra aYar E.r.r.y
r «rkwlY.Ylwtl �•L aa..yr.w rf••.S i�.r >. w.a..
r r .Yr p.+.+YM r r r.wwe.Yr W It >w.w .. s or F cc w
.w r ara..ry r r .Y trt tl « tl «• Ww r SOe W r • r.at 14.a
momr ar C r•w N IrYYYYy ✓Herr r aW 1! tl «i>rr•••4 eY • rr.. • 79)Af W r • rr+ • aarwww <R r rru•Y•. aawM Y r W raI w ..YM Y .ar eaa r• a •aw 1e YRYi d ar �w praat if..w w Y arlr7r [ r.. Yte )Yr.tww ! Iw1/ M Y . prq r MYnS rw N LrrM) rrY�r.wr1 arwr r r a.Y w ¢, 71w ra. 7• F ar aA'rl rrw w r aw f! tl « i Sde.aaYrY rawrt.e.r iY • raYw I II3 W a tiw0in in •rarw r.er r f.r Y.ar+r0 faLtl[ .w. W.....wl
SIR >a6 .
M arsr Y. L4 !i Aia 4aerr.rat � N.h e.trM
rr2wfw pewwrrrr.4
pokloun
aYrYla w thr w, fro wl ([� afeea.11 re: ✓Yet rYYrA
r r Swlq Oraa w N q r)I..[ iYrrY. .w.Y/ ar r.t cart
r rrY►awet areq..
eosite
Ya Iw.YA
:Y w aTra Y, S. a0a, r wr d .Ywrr. Y trw.Yw A • .Yr..r
(it.ry r aw wi r e4
» ..... i>• ..i r .w . as .+r ..r.wA
K+:i
IV 3 ww
'(•a r i aw wkd. arrriY ar W: SYray a *Pft. S/n/"
am UP KML a
a. w.s. m s< »mt. e.w r w Y taewt a4
1Y ti Ye aaw . it rr 1 YgaMr. n.r rl/w-r-w w A R r q Ns
aeea A, w.w Yr+a V M Yrd Y rY4
iaL+MrYw•)e.Wgw•RIeaYW .4 aa.-0
A0.
a Yr.f'► •/sM
etlatllmrtlr a
oL
• re-rr. (a.al ew. N rw r w wr
uw...
..An R M1
I / tYafw : •aem as IL
m w R
rAA e
s tr.+r
M taw.lr r Arlo. V.
Swl
0w M.L.Nw « N(14 r.rrw -0
I0,3M R w
]M.)Ifl3 w 14
w r .rb So (ek
3n (f.T) . 20 - 24) a..e a.tY PAW w.tY
2xuxwrtr2aa. M"MRR
Y Mw/ tie. N {w tar Il.d q rwr
A•tl.a 2m — I Ln . 29 . Ar ) .errs
anaa.... 0..tl. alf•A. L
ala O..alwe 1ltull.a r. ! f.wY
A4•aat .AIt t . • 2w • .4S 2aN
7WIf•. Lwt. mil.
t w.rw
>a, Or q A
I.aa i I d N L.Ya a0..w r N g a ae.n
w rY.r .irr es w.
01 ram i
tar. ftw-*
A. rw " M Ar41r K Sao: oaf
(n(��a.7.�y.I7rr•.r.w Wf)1 a.w r w. w oa
l0.100aw.E. IL .t51
ft'nlian w R
raea Comom r
'!awd N r..awt M 7.ANr M1 Sa 3A•>• r r 7wYfY Oare....e
i4+•1 Or/wu d Oas r�� tWl w .Yp1/ r.r
.arYr Y N Afaaw. r~iY r N r.rA im r.na.a..t r r aw+rr
ftr ar w
am tlM1
r fe )a0 M1 C
Mrl ~ w M1
K� M I.tA/r. I eOr.Y.
spun t
Z ri.r.r w "w K sr..n f.Y i.7 /N [waoaww
w 4 e r.w w r<arw
k ttwa y
fr r.e.r d.r r1r • �r-r�.9I YY r.aA (am{ W w wY Y A!y
N ..rw arMr r . eeY4 w i Iw f.fwe r r r aa.rrr iM D•ti
tat rrw I s t.aiw rw rr r.fe As. r..tra taw pwl tY. Y f+aaaA
al.r w./ . e•ae w rl..aY• ar r a* pe) a.ew f.r.r•rYa.a dr
nr..rrw • tact I aY. p) aarwlrNr CO'+Yr.�Y►.w M taw;
w r r..ra Yr .ter w s.r. Ins r N tr+a.�..e
R.aw r r bw araw r 0wr as.t1 rw4 N..ww .r.ar w w hYs
>ll�itR) M. [r rre r ar S) 0. r aaarq
�- y Sr r N aMwr l.rpf r r rM► r Y www wiu: r l7 Rl
r r)w. I Uir�(•wJ[txy « lM r r R r rwa tr... I
.raw r.•f'r w .aaY.• dMrw rr!
MP.M�w ar W AJIMULLe LZ
_ I." Of.r.'. fin.•wk
��w~`i..viwi'r a'~ie •�w.tY• .••r• w r�i s r e.,
e'••r wi r aw )m R
rwr (re!. ,
n.w ar-•: r YYn a 4errr
>wr. Ark
tr. Doan sr-r
Mwp.i.e H'-T. ur W. r rrtw
hr ifa. iR-r
Mr. *. Y
M oar. f-Y
:flrwr. 7•. M aT-Y..r lalYti r EiYr
FMM
� r rya Ir hIW M, LL is r r lYYY MrYY. r f'!/ r YYK Irrr N
a..r• r +..• r••1 Y w aaYs
«h. W
a.r e.r•re�r.
oar . r r.w-I.e.w .a w .teat w Iq ws ar .+r w pal
« 4r• rtr r �... i� Ynra
� .YY. iie ne
rw ra.. a•r ».
yiriao » at sa
rr. a. u
rrr an @
MjYYy wow. aYar. r 1) wow Ar r rat.elr torte
aROW moat f
~rx r.•rr w.taea Y. S T a\ L it •It. IrYr a.mr
.Y.wiwY w r s a Y r FI rr.'ae.
Y N eJ 4YK ti rMR Y wew r 1SAtl w R «rr Y
)ititl0 i M1 r r•w a.eY.r « r •weY r rover rr M.. w ada.e
.�.,epw1 r�wtD +�iae wra�o. (p Ew poor .~mlr�rr wr � atia➢
rwt.iM .ri ► YREw wY.re. J
i r r aaW w..rrlr .f.�rfir.r
I• •21 Yati
atl AwlM/fm •af r►.rw.aY tt•
ww n
nwirta.w/7Yai.i�riwleOarrMrlrw
I.rtY a Ow [ � A •Pr •trio rI r yw N i r r YrfY
M.we
l .YY.•rY. I►w•fir w4.
w
rr.tr w.tr YOr
oars
WUOR—USE SPECIAL PERMIT DRAWINGS SU AL 2/119
4
wns r atral.ar
aY res.v
ISSUE DATE
G10D RE Y/11F
t
FI—OefwK irtl[.
2Dt[RD MfO:
gar "11BER
4/ M
I 1 1
1 1 I
1 1
I I I
11
a
1 1
1
1
1
t 1
Rar. rs7J 1
M w_CS
1 .,,.. 0. I
1
1
X
, 1
I I
,1
I 1 ,
1 I t
•.r . np t
a[w:-r11
1 1 -x
i I I
S
�—
1 I
1
I 1
TIC
I 1 1
1 1
I
M®
1
I
=9=. I w PLC
seta: f'=�
' MAJOR -USE SPECIAL PERMIT DRAWINGS SUBMITTAL 1/10/�.`
o
onwa.+mt
` st+c�r twliet�r