Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutR-99-0307J-99-339 4/16/99 RESOLUTION NO. 9 9 - 307 A RESOLUTION OF THE MIAMI CITY COMMISSION, WITH ATTACHMENT (S) , APPROVING WITH CONDITIONS, A MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT PURSUANT TO ARTICLES 5, 13 AND 17 OF ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 11000, FOR THE BISCAYNE BAY TOWER PROJECT, TO BE LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY 501 NORTHEAST 36TH STREET, MIAMI, FLORIDA, TO BE COMPRISED OF NOT MORE THAN 358 UNITS, WITH ACCESSORY RECREATIONAL SPACE AND 525 PARKING SPACES; DIRECTING TRANSMITTAL OF THE HEREIN RESOLUTION; MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATING CONCLUSIONS OF LAW; PROVIDING FOR BINDING EFFECT; CONTAINING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, on February 8, 1999, Biscayne Bay Tower, LLC., submitted a complete Application for Major Use Special Permit for the Biscayne Bay Tower Project pursuant to Articles 5, 9, 13 and 17 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, for the property located at approximately 501 Northeast 36th Street, Miami, Florida, as legally described on "Exhibit B11, attached hereto and in "Exhibit All, the Development Order attached hereto; and WHEREAS, development of the Biscayne Bay Tower Project requires the issuance of a Major Use Special Permit pursuant to Article 17 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, the Zoning Ordinance of CTX COVWSWON MEETING OF APR 2 7 1999 Resolution No. Uj IV - the City of Miami, Florida, as amended; and WHEREAS, the Large Scale Development Committee met on December 14, 1998, to consider the proposed project and offer its input; and WHEREAS, the APPLICANT has modified the proposed project to address the expressed technical concerns raised at said Large Scale Development Committee meeting; and WHEREAS, the Urban Development Review Board met on January 13, 1999, to consider the proposed project and recommended approval of the project as presented; and WHEREAS, the Miami Planning Advisory Board, at its meeting held on March 17, 1999, Item No. 1, following an advertised public hearing, adopted Resolution No. PAB 10-99 by a vote of seven to zero (7-0), RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of the Major Use Special Permit Development Order as attached hereto; and WHEREAS, the City Commission deems it advisable and in the best interest of the general welfare of the City of Miami to issue a Major Use Special Permit Development Order as hereinafter set forth; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. The recitals and findings contained in the Preamble to this Resolution are hereby adopted by reference thereto and incorporated herein as if fully set forth in this - 2 - S-y-- 307 Section. Section 2. A Major Use Special Permit Development Order, attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and made a part hereof, is hereby approved subject to the conditions specified in said Development Order, per Article 17 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, for the Biscayne Bay Tower Project (hereinafter referred to as the "PROJECT") to be developed by Biscayne Bay Tower, LLC. ("APPLICANT"), at approximately 501 Northeast 36th Street, Miami, Florida, more particularly described on "Exhibit B", attached hereto and made a part hereof. Section 3. The PROJECT is hereby approved for the construction of up to three hundred fifty eight (358) residential units, with accessory recreational space and 525 parking spaces. Section 4. The Major Use Special Permit Application for the Biscayne Bay Tower Project also encompasses the lower ranking Special Permits as set forth in the Development Order, attached as Exhibit "All hereto and incorporated herein. Section 5. The findings of fact set forth below are hereby made with respect to the subject PROJECT: a. The PROJECT is in conformity with the adopted Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000, as amended. b. The PROJECT is in accord with the R-4/SD-20 Zoning classifications of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, as - 3 - 30- 30'7 11 2 amended. c. Pursuant to Section 1305 of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, the specific site plan aspects of the PROJECT, i.e., ingress and egress, parking, signs and lighting, utilities, drainage, preservation of natural features and control of potentially adverse effects generally, have been considered and will be further considered administratively during the process of issuing a building permit and a certificate of occupancy. d. The PROJECT is expected to cost approximately $44,292,258, and to employ approximately 129 workers during construction (Full Time Employees [FTED ; the PROJECT will also result in the creation of approximately 14 permanent new jobs. The PROJECT will generate approximately $1.1 million annually in tax revenues to local units of government (of which approximately $450,000 will go to the City of Miami) (1999 dollars). e. The City Commission further finds that: (1) the PROJECT will have a favorable impact on the economy of the City; (2) the PROJECT will efficiently use public transportation facilities; (3) any potentially adverse effects of the PROJECT will be mitigated through compliance 4 99 07 with the conditions of this Major Use Special Permit; (4) the PROJECT will favorably affect the need for people to find adequate housing reasonably accessible to their places of employment; (5) the PROJECT will efficiently use necessary public facilities; (6) the PROJECT will not negatively impact the environment and natural resources of the city; (7) the PROJECT will not adversely affect living conditions in the neighborhood; (8) the PROJECT will not adversely affect public safety; (9) based on the record presented and evidence presented, the public welfare will be served by the PROJECT; and (10) any potentially adverse effects of the PROJECT arising from safety and security, — fire protection and life safety, solid waste, eritage conservation, trees, shoreline development, minority participation and employment, and minority contractor/subcontractor participation will be mitigated through compliance with the -5- 99- 307 v 1 conditions of this Major Use Special Permit. Section 6. The Major Use Special Permit, as approved and amended, shall be binding upon the APPLICANTS and any successors in interest. Section 7. The application for Major Use Special Permit, which was submitted on February 8, 1999, and on file with the Planning Department of the City of Miami, Florida, shall be relied upon generally for administrative interpretations and is made a part hereof by reference. Section 8. This Major Use Special Permit will expire two (2) years from its effective date which is thirty (30) days after the adoption of the herein Resolution. Section 9. The City Manager is hereby directed to instruct the Director of the Planning Department to transmit a copy of this Resolution and attachment to the developers: Biscayne Bay Tower, LLC., c/o Felipe Paraud, 700 West 51st Street, Miami Beach, FL 33140. Section 3.0. The Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law are made with respect to the Project as described in the Development Order for the Biscayne Bay Tower Project, which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A1l and made a part hereof by reference, as more particularly described in Exhibit "A". Section 11. The Major Use Special Permit Development Order for the Biscayne Bay Tower Project (Exhibit "A") is hereby granted and issued. Section 12. In the event that any portion or section of this Resolution or the Development Order (Exhibit "All) is - 6 - 4:- 99- 307 0 determined to be invalid, illegal, or unconstitutional by a court or agency of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall in no manner affect the remaining portions of this Resolution or Development Order (Exhibit "All) which shall remain in full force and effect. Section 13. This Resolution shall become effective thirty (30) days after its adoptionll. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 27th day of April , 1999. JOB CAROLLO, MAYOR in accordance with Miami Code Sec. 2-36, since the Mayor did not indicate approval of this legislation by signing it in the designated plac provided, sa;d leo sliafo- c. becomes effective with the elapse often (10) ays the date of Commissicr, _. regarding same, without the Maya a erci ing ATTEST: Iter J , City Clerk WALTER J. FOEMAH% CITY S 6% vI 0:GMM:hdb 1/ This Resolution shall become effective as specified herein unless vetoed by the Mayor within ten days from the date it was passed and adopted. If the Mayor vetoes this Resolution, it shall become effective immediately upon override of the veto by the City Commission or upon the effective date stated herein, whichever is later. - 7 - SJ- 3,07 EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHMENT TO RESOLUTION NO. DATE: BISCAYNE BAY TOWER PROJECT MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT DEVELOPMENT ORDER Let it be known that pursuant to Articles 5, 13 and 17 of Ordinance No. 11000, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended, the Commission of the City of Miami, Florida, has considered in a public hearing, the issuance of a Major Use Special Permit for the Biscayne Bay Tower Project (hereinafter referred to as the "PROJECT") to be located at approximately 501 NE 36th Street, Miami, Florida; see legal description on "Exhibit B", attached hereto and made a part hereof; said legal description is subject to any dedications, limitations, restrictions, reservations or easements of record. After due consideration of the recommendations of the Planning Advisory Board and after due consideration of the consistency of this proposed development with the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan, the City Commission has approved the PROJECT, and subject to the following conditions approves the Major Use Special Permit and hereby issues this Permit: - 1 - �J- 307 ,4' h T1• PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The proposed Biscayne Bay Tower Project is a residential development located at approximately 501 NE 36th Street, Miami, Florida ("PROJECT"). The PROJECT is located on a gross lot area of approximately 4.259 acres and a net lot area of approximately 2.013 acres of land (more specifically described on "Exhibit B", incorporated herein by reference). The remainder of the PROJECT's Data is attached hereto as "Exhibit C", and incorporated herein by reference. The proposed PROJECT will consist of no more than 358 residential units in a single 35 story tower with approximately 16,000 sq. ft. of accessory recreational space; said recreational space includes a recreation deck with a swimming pool, aerobics and weight room area, a library, a lounge and a running track. The PROJECT will also provide a total of 525 parking spaces. The ownership, operation and maintenance of common areas and facilities will be by the property owner or (in the case of the property being converted to condominiums) a mandatory property owner association in perpetuity pursuant to a recorded Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions. The Major Use Special Permit Application for the Biscayne Bay Tower Project also encompasses the following lower ranking Special Permits: CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, for a Federal Aviation Authority Clearance letter; CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 906.6, for a swimming pool; CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 917.1.2, for valet parking service; CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 15, Section 1511, for development between Biscayne Bay and the first dedicated public right-of-way; CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 906.2, for access from a public street with widths greater than 25 feet; CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 15 for reduction of the required 23 ft. backup for parking area to 22 ft.; Pursuant to Articles 13 and 17 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, approval of the requested Major Use Special Permit shall be considered sufficient for the subordinate permits and requested referenced above. The PROJECT shall be constructed substantially in accordance with plans and design schematics on file prepared by The Sieger Architectural Partnership, dated January 1999; the landscape plan shall be implemented substantially in accordance with plans and design schematics on file prepared by EGS2 Corporation, dated January 1999; said design and landscape plans may be permitted to be modified only to the extent necessary to comply with the conditions for approval imposed herein; all modifications shall be subject to the review and approval of the Director of the Planning Department prior to the issuance of any building permits. %I - - 3 ga)- 307 a 7.. V- The PROJECT conforms to the requirements of the R-4/SD-20 Zoning District, as contained in Ordinance No. 11000, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended. The existing comprehensive plan future land use designation allows the proposed mix of commercial and residential uses. I. THE APPLICANT, ITS SUCCESSORS, AND/OR ASSIGNS, JOINTLY OR SEVERALLY, PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF ANY BUILDING PERMITS, SHALL COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING: 1. Meet all applicable building codes, land development regulations, ordinances and other laws. 2. Pay all applicable fees due prior to the issuance of a building permit. 3. Allow the Miami Police Department to conduct a security survey, at the option of the Department, and to make recommendations concerning security measures and systems; further submit a report to the Department of Planning and Development, prior to commencement of construction, demonstrating how the Police Department recommendations, if any, have been incorporated into the PROJECT security and construction plans, or demonstrate to the Planning Director why such recommendations are impractical. 4. Provide a letter from the Department of Fire -Rescue indicating APPLICANT'S coordination with members of the e7 �! j 0 r 1 Fire Plan Review Section at the Department of Fire - Rescue in the review of the scope of the PROJECT, owner responsibility, building development process and review procedures, as well as specific requirements for fire protection and life safety systems, exiting, vehicular access and water supply. 5. Provide a letter of assurance from the Solid Waste Department that the PROJECT has addressed all concerns of the said Department. 6. Prepare a Minority Participation and Employment Plan (including a Contractor/Subcontractor Participation Plan) to be submitted to the City's Director of Equal Employment Opportunity for review and comments, with the understanding that the the APPLICANT must use its best efforts to follow the City's Minority/Women Business Affairs and Procurement requirements, as set forth in Sections 18-136 through 18-146 of the Code of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended. 7. Record the following in the Public Records of Dade County, Florida: 1) a Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions providing that the ownership, operation and maintenance of all common areas and facilities will be by the property owner or a mandatory property owner association in perpetuity; 2) a certified copy of the development order specifying that the Development Order runs with the land and is binding on the APPLICANT, its successors, and assigns, jointly or severally. - 5 - S9- 307 8. Demonstrate to the City that the PROJECT has either: 1) completed its condominium requirements and has been approved for such by the State of Florida; or 2) provide the City with an executed, recordable unity of title or covenant in -lieu of unity of title agreement for the subject property; said agreement shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Attorney's Office. 9. Complete the replatting process and provide the Public Works Department of the City of Miami with plans for proposed sidewalk and swale area improvements for their review and approval prior to the issuance of a building permit. 10. Provide the Planning Department with a temporary parking plan which addresses construction employee parking during the construction period; said plan shall be subject to the review and approval by the Planning Department prior to the issuance of any building permits. II. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY, APPLICANT SHALL COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING: 1) Pursuant to the requirement of the Fire Department, the roof area of the proposed structure shall be made available to the City of Miami for any necessary communications equipment at no charge to the City. 2) The applicant shall improve the adjacent park, subject to approval of the owner thereof, by providing - 6 - may- 3307 �U- t- J I z �M. access, lighting, and a parking area, as determined by the Planning Department. THE CITY SHALL: Establish the effective date of this Permit as being thirty (30) days from the date of its issuance with the issuance date constituting the commencement of the thirty (30) day period to appeal from the provisions of the Permit. The Biscayne Bay Tower Project, proposed by the applicant, Biscayne Bay Tower, LLC.,("APPLICANT"), complies with the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000, is consistent with the orderly development and goals of the City of Miami, and complies with local land development regulations and further, pursuant to Section 1703 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000: (1) the PROJECT will have a favorable impact on the economy of the City; and (2) the PROJECT will efficiently use public transportation facilities; and (3) the PROJECT will favorably affect the need for people to find adequate housing reasonably accessible to their places of employment; and (4) the PROJECT will efficiently use necessary public facilities; and - 7 - 99-'07 (5) the PROJECT will not negatively impact the environment and natural resources of the City; and (6) the PROJECT will not adversely affect public safety; and (7) the public welfare will be served by the PROJECT; and (8) any potentially adverse effects of the PROJECT will be mitigated through conditions of this Major Use Special Permit. The proposed development does not unreasonably interfere with the achievement of the objectives of the adopted State Land Development Plan applicable to the City of Miami. Pursuant to Section 1305 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, the specific site plan aspects of the PROJECT i.e., ingress and egress, offstreet parking and loading, refuse and service areas, signs and lighting, utilities, drainage and control • of potentially adverse effects generally have been considered and will be further considered administratively during the process of issuing individual building permits and certificates of occupancy. 99- a07 'm z A11 EXHIBIT,,,_ ---------------------------------------- LEGAL DESCRIPTION: The Land is described as follows: Lots 1-8, Block 2, and Lots 1-8, Block 3, of WEST POINT, according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 18, at Page 73, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida; Less the following described parcels: A) The following portion acquired by Order of Taking filed January 25, 1960 in Official Records Book 1866, at Page 182. described as follows: Lot 6, in Block 3, of WEST POINT, as per plot thereof recorded in Plat Book 18, at Page 73. of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows: Begin at the Northeast corner of said Lot 6; thence Westerly along the Northerly line of said Lot 6, u dislancc of 105.00 feet to the Northwest corner of said Lot 6; thence South 82 degrees 29 minutes 58 seconds East, a distance of 105.79 feet to a point on the Easterly line of said Lot 6; thence Northerly along said Easterly line, a distance of 13.00 feet to the Point of Beginning. B) A strip of land 5 feet in width across the South end of the following described lots, to -wit: Lots 1, 2, 3 and 4 of Block 2, and Lots 1, 2, 3, and 4 of Block 3, all according to the plot of West Point Subdivision, as recorded in Plat Book 18, Page 73 of the Public Records 40, of Miami -Dade County, Florida. C) That part of Lot 1, in Block 2 of West Point Subdivision, according to the Plat recorded in Plat Book 18, Page 73 of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida, lying Southwest of a curve concave to the Northeast, having a radius of 25 feet, the North end of said curve being tangent to the East right of way line of N.E. 5th Avenue, and the East end of said curve being tangent to a line 5 feet North of and parallel to the South line of said Lot 1, AND D) That part of Lot 4, in Block 2 of West Point Subdivision, according to the Plat recorded in Plat Book 18, Page 73, of the public records of Miami -Dade County, Florida, lying Southeast of a curve concave to the Northwest having a radius of 25 feet, the North end of said curve being tangent to the West right of way line of N.E. 6th Avenue, and the West end of said curve being tangent to a line 5 feet North of and parallel to the South line of said Lot 4, AND E) That part of Lot 1, in Block 3 of West Point Subdivision, according to the Plat recorded in Plat Book 18, Page 73 of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida, lying Southwest of a curve concave to the Northeast, having a radius of 25 feet, the North end of said curve being tangent to the East right of way line of N.E. 6th Avenue, and the East end of said curve being tangent to a line 5 feet North of and parallel to the South line of said Lot 1, AND F) That part of Lot 4, in Block 3 of West Point Subdivision, according to the Plat recorded in Plat Book 18, Page 73. of the public records of Miami -Dade County, Florida,lying Southeast of a curve concave to the Northwest having a radius of 25 feet, the North end of said curve being _ tangent to the West right of way line of N.E. 6th Avenue, and the West end of said curve being tangent to a line 5 feet North of and parallel to the South line of said Lot 4. 1. Legal Description: 2. Address: 3. 4. 5. NJ 7. EXHIBIT "C" BISCAYNE BAY TOWER MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT Project Data Sheet Lots 1-8, Block 2, and Lots 1-8, Block 3, of WEST POINT, according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 18, at page 73, of the Public Records of Miami - Dade County, Florida. Said land lying and being in the City of Miami. Florida. Approximately 501 N.E. 36 h Street Miami, Florida Zoning Classificatiomi ` �~ City of Miami R-4 / SD 20 'Lot Area. - Gross Area. Net Area: Density: Units/Acre Allowed Units/Acre Provided Allowable Area: Floor Area Ratio (FAR) Loading Berths: 8. Height: Tower Parking Structure %1 4.259 acres or 185,534 sq.ft. 2.013 acres or 87,672 sq.ft. 150 units/acre 178 units/acre (358 total units) 1.72 + 20% P.U.D. Bonus allowed Required: 5 loading berths 12 ft. x 55 ft. x 15 ft. Provided: 4 loading berths 12 ft. x 55 ft. x 15 ft. 8 loading berths 10 ft. x 20 ft. No height limitation 360 ft. provided (35 floors, including deck) 40 ft. 4 in. (5 floors, including subterranean) S9- '307 9. Building Footprint: Maximum Allowed Provided 10. No. of Parking Spaces 74,214 sq.ft. (40 %) 59,723 sq.ft. (32.19% ) 418 Regular Spaces Required 516 Regular Spaces Provided 9 Handicap Spaces Required 9 Handicap Spaces Provided 427 Total Spaces Required 525 Total Spaces Provided 11. Setbacks: N.E. 36`h Street 15 ft. Required 15 ft. Provided N.E. 5 h Avenue 20 ft Required 20 ft Provided = 1-195 5 ft Required 5 R.Provided -- N.E. 7`h Avenue 5 ft. Required 5 ft. Provided (after closure) - 9 9 - 307 i _• t Project Summary for Biscayne Bay Tower January 28, 1999 PROJECT CRITERIA - ZONING / SFTRArKS SI; E REQUIRED/AL OWABLE RQVIO ZONING DISTRICT R-4/SD-20 BASE F.A.R. 1.72 1T2 NET LOT AREA _ _ NET LOT DIMENSIONS GROSS LOTAF2EA ""'_ _""'—� •_._....... _ __ 87,672 S.F. ((2.013 acres 479'-11" x 182'-7" 185.534 S.F. 4.259 acres — GROSS F.A.R. 1.72 x G.L.A. 319,118 PLUS 20% P.U.D. DEV. BONUS TOTAL F.A.R. REQUIRED 319,118 x .20 63,824 382,942 PROJECT F.A.R. REQUESTED 4$4.468 Run SSETBACK F' SETBACK FOR N.E 36TH STREET 15'-0" SETBACK FOR N.E. 5TH AVENUE 29-0" 20'-0' SETBACK FOR 1-195 SETBACK FOR N.E. TTH AAVJ-t U_E 5'-0" V-0" Aftet Closure 9 9 - oa"7 Project Summary for Biscayne Bay Tower January 28, 1999 nKtwDiXAWWN;3�'I,�e�-:PROD •� ql A.Ro- BREAKDOWN:��;- ��'e:PROGRAM;r .. ��11!TjC FA.R� S:E: i. ;� :+ANON=F.A.R. t���{1E� 'S.P, F::.GROSS S:P: ' P!4�{1j1 TfUF Subterranean Storage, Bike Room, Trash Room 0 5.877 5,877 Stairs & Elevator Hoistways 0 1.224 _ 1,224 Subterranean Park. Struct. Parking, Loadin Dock 0 51.884 _ 51.884 58,985 Lobby Level _ Lobby, Elevator Lobby, Restrm. 6.012 0 6,012 _ Function rm., Office & Service 0 4,734 4,734 Lobby Level Park. Struct. Stairs, Elevator Hoist., Trash Chute Parking. Service 0 0 1,881 44,440 _ 1,881 44,440 57.067 Mezzanine Level - _ _ Mezz. Level Park. Struct. Card Room, Storage Stairs, Elevator Hoist., Trash Chute �. 0 3,830 3,830 0 1,8 99 1,899 Parkin _ 0 50.320 _ _ 50,320 56.049 3rd Level _ Leasing Office, Bus. Center, Nursery 0 3,830 3,830 Stairs, Elevator Hoist., Trash Chute 0 1,916 1.916 3rd Level Park. Struct Parkin 0 50.142 50,142 55.888 4th Level _ 9 Residential Units 9,500 0 9,500 - - - -- Common Corridor, Storage _ 1,739 2.429 4,168 Stairs, Elevator Hoist, Trash Chute Balconies, Patios, Ext. Corridors 0 - -y-- 0 _ 1,803 -- - 2,767 _ _ 1_803 ^ 2,767 - r 4th Level Park. Strut. Parking, Spa Deck 0 43,315 43,315 61.553 5th Level 9 Residential Units, Com. Int Corridor 10,673 0 10,673 Function rm., Restrooms 0 1,434 1,434 _ Stairs, Elevator Hoist., Trash Chute 0 1,469 1,469 Balconies & Exterior Corridors 0 1,484 1,484 5th Level Pool Deck Pool Deck, Tennis Court - 0 33.820 33,820 48,880 6th - 9th Level 10 Residential Units (4 Floors) 48.344 0 48,344 Stairs, Elevator Hoist., Trash Chute 0 5,392 5,392 Balconies & Exterior Corridor 0 9.024 9.024 62.760 10th Level 12 Residential Units, Meter rm. 14,328 100 14,428 Stairs, Elevator Hoist, Trash Chute 0 911 911 Balconies & Exterior Corridor 0 3.087 3,087 18,426 11 th - 13th Level 12 Residential Units (3 Floors),Meter 42.984 300 43.284 Stairs: Elevator, Trash, Meter rm. 0 2,733 2.733 Balconies & Exterior Corridor 0 _ 9.441 9.441 55,458 14th - 33rd Level 12 Residential Units 20 Floors ,Mete 286,560 2,000 288.560 Stairs, Elevator, Trasn, Meter rm. 0 18,220 _ 18,220 Balconies & Exterior Corridor 0 75.904 75,904 382.684 34th Level 12 Residential Units, Meter rm. 14,328 100 14,428 Stairs, Elevator, Trash, Meter rm. Balconies & Exterior Corridor 0 911 _ 911 0 4,359 4,359 19,698 35th Level - Spa Deck Aerobics, Weight rm.. Library, Loung 0 2,722 2.722 Stairs, Elevator, Trasn, Meter rm. 0 911 911 Cooling Tower, Storage Deck. Running Track 0 835 835 0 13,362 13.362 17.830 Vp �, � �ti t d :ici�i�� '" 434i68�r : ,;ram: F, G 460,810,s: ':,'.895.278 -895;278 0 9 - '307 I a m S,VSTFonrm. LNG" loll, FLORIDA 33126 6954 N.W. 12 STREET,M99•FAX 305-433-7526 305-417 91e 8 a photocopy IMWMMmmml I FC 017 m t Project Summary for Biscayne Bay Tower -wary 28, 1999 PRn.IFCT CRITFRIA . PARKING I I f)ADING PARKING '�i,3 ONING CODE ; - One Bedrooms 1 space x 67 67 spaces Two Bedrooms Three Bedrooms120 NET TOTAL PARKING - HANDICAPPED 1 space x 231 231 spaces 2% of Total (418) s ap ces 9 spaces TOTAL PARKING REt1UIRED 427 TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED 525 P.ARK1N CONF.IG ' RATiON RE9UIRE PJi Floor Number of Parking Spaces_ Subterranean Level __ _ Lobby Level _, _ _ _ _ 86 S82 Standard + 4 H_ 1.35 104 Standard + 1 HC Mezzanine Level 121 119 Standard + 2 HC) 3rd Level 121 119 Standard + 2 HC 4th level 418 standards aces required _ 92 -- 9 handica2 spaces required 516 Standard + 9 HC TOTAL 427 totals aces required 525 totals acas ded L06CDINGREQUIREME Q IREUNWERC5010 Project Gross Square Footage = 915.046 1 every 100 units = 3 Berths 4 Berths P- iect Total Units = 358 1 for every 30 units above = 2 Berths 8 loading spaces T` TOTAL BERTHS 5 Berths 12 total loading spaces t,,. Project Summary for Biscayne Bay Tower January 28, 1999 RO.IECT CRITERIA. tINIT RRKAunnWM ENTUL IDVEMM FLOORS UNITS PER FLR TOTAL UNIT'A' UNIT'A2' UNrr'A3' MTV UNIT'E2' UNIT V UNIT V 4th Level 9 9 1 2 1 2 1 — 1 1 5th Level _ 6'th - 9th Level r_ 9 9 _ 1 +8 2 2 2 0_ 1 1 10 x 4 40 _ 0 0 16 0 8 8 10th Level 12 12 2 0 0 6 _ 0 2 2 11 th -13th Level _ 12 x 3 36 6 0 0 18 0 6 6 141h - 33rd Level 12 x 20 240 —40-- _ 0 0 120 _ 0 40 40 34th Level 12 12 _ 2 0 0 6 _ 0 2 2 T� 'n 358 6a 1�676.-4 4 .129G .ti4% 70 4 9• 60. 1 B. 6 1 09- "007 PZ-1 PLANNING FACT SHEET APPLICANT Lucia Dougherty for Biscayne Bay Tower, LLC. HEARING DATE March 17, 1999 REQUEST/LOCATION Consideration of a Major Use Special Permit for the Biscayne Bay Tower Project located at 501 NE 361" Street. LEGAL DESCRIPTION Complete legal description on file with the Hearing Boards Office. PETITION Consideration of approving a Major Use Special Permit for the Biscayne Bay Tower Project located at 501 NE 361" Street in order to allow a residential Planned Unit Development consisting of 358 units with 525 parking spaces and accessory recreational uses. PLANNING Approval with conditions. RECOMMENDATION BACKGROUND AND Please see attached analysis. ANALYSIS PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD Approval with conditions VOTE: 7-0 CITY COMMISSION N/A APPLICATION NUMBER 99-006 Item #1 i........................ ........................... _...................... ...................... ............................... .............. ............... ...................... ........................................... CITY OF MIAMI - PLANNING DEPARTMENT 444 SW 2NO AVENUE, 3RO FLOOR • MIAMI, FLORIDA, 33130 PHONE (305) 416-1400 _...........� ......................_.........................._............. ».............................._................................................................. I............ Date: 03/10/99 Page 1 S9- 607 t�'- ANALYSIS FOR MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT Biscayne Bay Tower CASE NO: 99-006 The requested Major Use Special Permit is for the purpose of allowing a Residential Planned Unit Development project consisting of 358 units and accessory recreational uses with 525 parking spaces for the property located at approximately 501 NE 36`h Street within the Edgewater Area. This Major Use Special Permit also encompasses the following lower ranking permits: CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, for a Federal Aviation Authority Clearance letter; CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 906.6 for a swimming pool; CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 917.1.2 for valet parking service; CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 15, Section 1511 for development between Biscayne Bay and the first dedicated public right-of-way; CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 908.2 for access from a public street with widths greater than 25 feet; CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 15 for reduction of the required 23 ft. backup for parking area to 22 ft.. Pursuant to Articles 13 and 17 of Zoning Ordinance 11000, approval of the requested Major Use Special Permit shall be considered sufficient for the subordinate permits and requested referenced above. In determining the appropriateness of the proposed residential project, the Planning Department has referred this project to the Large Scale Development Committee (LSDC) and the Urban Development Review Board (UDRB) for additional input and recommendations; the following findings have been made: It is found that the proposed residential development project will benefit the City by creating new housing opportunities for residents and employees of the area. -07 _• s -� �i CJ ti- • It is found that the project was reviewed by the Large Scale Development Committee on December 14, 1998 and has modified the proposed project to address the expressed technical concerns raised at said Large Scale Development Committee meeting; however, replatting of the subject property and additional design details related to sidewalk and swale area improvements will have to be submitted at the time of permitting. • It is found that the applicant should submit a parking plan for construction employees while the new building is under construction; said parking plan shall be subject to the review and approval by the Planning Department prior to the issuance of any building permits. • It is found that the UDRB has recommended approval of the proposed project with pursuant to a public meeting held on January 13, 1999. • It is found that per the Fire Department, the roof of the proposed structure may be required for communications equipment to serve the City; this are should be made available for said use at no charge to the City. • It is found that with respect to all additional criteria as specified in Section 1305 of Zoning Ordinance 11000, the proposal has been reviewed and found to be adequate. Based on these findings, the Planning Department is recommending approval of the requested Residential Planned Unit Development Project with the following conditions: 1. The approval of this Major Use Special Permit shall be subject to the recordation of the following documents prior to the issuance of any building permits for the proposed project: a. Unity of Title or covenant in lieu thereof providing that the ownership, operation and maintenance of all common areas and facilities will be by the property owner or a mandatory property owner association in perpetuity or completion of the State of Florida condominium process which assures the same compliance. b. Development Order specifying that the Development Order runs with the land and is binding on the Applicant, it successors and assigns, jointly or severally. 2. Pursuant to the Department of Public Works, the property requires replatting and compliance with all conditions thereto; and, project requires plans for proposed sidewalk and swale area improvements prior to the issuance of a building permit. zi 0 N I Pursuant to the Fire Department, the roof area of the proposed structure shall be made available to the City of Miami for any necessary communications equipment at no charge to the City. 4. Submittal of a parking plan for construction employees while the new building is under construction; said parking plan shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning Department prior to the issuance of any building permits. 5. This approval shall also be subject to all additional conditions as specified in the attached Development Order. 3 99- 30 • ,N h 17 r to 9 n I. / _ t O '• , to f �•� '° 11 LO N 44 ST. � mot- � 6 fie, '• •� •� •1 ,y 4 d ' A.A.A ' ` m , PROPERTY 1 2 •,. � • t �� to ' O *ACT a' / .,'WEIALEVGR 4 ST. / / ° tl '�'� •s • TRACT „ t cr 's N. 42Z / ♦ e TR ,r°.• •r .. Q P •It SAsAL 3 • t�� d — ( •, to O� b� .• v) C i _ sae _ ,. ' N'II 1• 1• .��N�• + �""` II oy � " P I -� +- N. E a 39 -w ST- J ! •49_ IL • , II ' 3 a° at a, v s' sa s! sl p u 4a? : as • , N.PRE 39 SIC H II tt ° « u •a « • • • Bi it - W s • �_ ar i , _ �. N. 38 f( U 34 saa aw to at ad t ° • n ST 1I, (I• ► s• .-I-lam W 35TH STREET SAYFRONT SUB.I� 1 •N E.. 3 5 T • I� ` loin n ii`11• sf ri li TRACT 'A- 1• _. )S� it l° 1• M Ii 1! 11 • � • 7 ! DAY POINT PLAC 1 y.l. n Iia it n 1. ,. • .� w l l ° , . l PAD TRACT -A r .. 1-, ,nnan .i i I far NE. 34 T. •" ,• ,• ao la y r y) n i. lj�!' a !° r• r n e l r ! 1 1 a • s r +f . L x � •. 1 • I N. E.- I % 4,33• ..ST.. ARK ' W TO W 49 Cae , r + I • r . co t z l • _ , , . s • s • • •t ! fRO�a .t r • I y. 2 L •a •• r• f l l y � TRC CT •t r r A( E° r ` FR6H tiV N, E. W •I S T -at + . TRACT A l 6 ITRAL iNA • a Harr • r� w }�y� ! 1 f e T 1 7. (1 !TA•� , '• " ° .. LIGHT KEY SYSTEM 5, `NUe „ SpUTNEp►'-+`'' T 126 6954 SW 12 STREET, 4�9 "`1FA �° 05- 7-7526 305-477-9149 •800-297 a pholocopY �n poor condition F:C O17 t.. tiO..Myyw..w..wA'r. •Irw..r•..38 �. .....- • ... .. •. r.. - •_ ..`^ �•��l 1, ', J pq 1• .a" t �.--. .." , L � K" Vr�n� ',Z} .�..e �••'r t`r.'i� Vic: f� � t _ •« .i, ;RR 4 rt.rw 0 J _ �07 RESOLUTION PAB -10-99 A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS OF A MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT FOR THE BISCAYNE BAY TOWER PROJECT LOCATED AT 501 NE 36 STREET IN ORDER TO ALLOW A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONSISTING OF 358 UNITS WITH 525 PARKING SPACES AND ACCESSORY RECREATIONAL USES. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL APPLY: 1) THE APPROVAL OF THIS MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT SHALL BE SUBJECT TO THE RECORDATION OF THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF ANY BUILDING PERMITS FOR THE PROPOSED PROJECT: A) UNITY OF TITLE OR COVENANT IN LIEU THEREOF PROVIDING THAT THE OWNERSHIP, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF ALL COMMON AREAS AND FACILITIES WILL BE BY THE PROPERTY OWNER OR A MANDATORY PROPERTY OWNER ASSOCIATION IN PERPETUITY OR COMPLETION OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CONDOMINIUM PROCESS WHICH ASSURES THE SAME COMPLIANCE. B) DEVELOPMENT ORDER SPECIFYING THAT THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER RUNS WITH THE LAND AND IS BINDING ON THE APPLICANT, ITS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, JOINTLY OR SEVERALLY, 2) PURSUANT TO THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, THE PROPERTY REQUIRES REPLATTING AND COMPLIANCE WITH ALL CONDITIONS THERETO; AND, PROJECT REQUIRES PLANS FOR PROPOSED SIDEWALK AND SWALE AREA IMPROVEMENTS PRIOR TO THE, ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT, 3) PURSUANT TO THE FIRE DEPARTMENT, THE ROOF AREA OF THE PROPOSED STRUCTURE SHALL BE MADE AVAILABLE TO THE CITY OF MIAMI FOR ANY NECESSARY COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT AT NO CHARGE TO THE CITY, 4) SUBMITTAL OF A PARKING PLAN FOR CONSTRUCTION EMPLOYEES WHILE THE NEW BUILDING IS UNDER CONSTRUCTION; SAID PARKING PLAN SHALL BE SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF ANY BUILDING PERMITS, 5) THIS APPROVAL SHALL ALSO BE SUBJECT TO ALL ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS AS SPECIFIED IN THE ATTACHED DEVELOPMENT ORDER, 6) IF A DAY CARE FACILITY IS PROPOSED, ALL CONDITIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE SHALL BE COMPLIED WITH, AND 7) APPLICANT SHALL IMPROVE THE ADJACENT PARK BY PROVIDING ACCESS, LIGHTING AND A PARKING AREA. HEARING DATE: March 17, 1999 ITEM NO. 1 VOTE: 7-0 lu It' A T T E T• v Ana Gelabee anc z, Directoro Planning D partifient 9 9 - "a" I 9 CITY OF M.IAMI DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND DEVELOP I\/1ENT APPLICATION FOR MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT IT IS INTENDED THAT MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMITS BE REQUIRED WHERE SPECIFIED USES AND/OR OCCUPANCIES INVOLVE MATTE: DEEMED TO BE OF CITYWIDE OR AREA -WIDE RAPORTANCE. Ir= CITY COMMISSION SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR DETERMINATIONS ON APPLICATIONS FOR MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMITS (SZZAR77CLE 17 OF ORDNANCE 11000, ASAXMVDF.D. 72W ZONING ORDINANCE OF77a CTIYOFAatK FLORIDA.) THE: CITY COMMISSION SHALL REFER ALL APPLICATIONS FOR MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMITS TO THE PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD AND TO THE DIRECTOR OF THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT FOR RECOMMENDATIONS, AND MAY MAKE REFERRALS TO AGENCIES, BODIES, OR OFFICERS. EITHER THROUGH TIM DEPARTMENT OF PUNNING AND DEVELOPMENT OR DIRECTLY, FOR REVIEW, ANALYSIS AND/OR TECHNICAL FINDINGS AND DETERMINATIONS AND REPORTS THEREON. (SEE SECTION 1301J OFORDNAh=11000, AS AMENDED, 'TA ZZONINGORDINANCEOF7HECITYOFAa414 FLORA SECTION 2.653 OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA. AS AMENDED, aENERA.LLY REQUIRES ANY PERSON WHO RECEIVES COMPENSATION. REMUNERATION OR EXPENSES FOR CONDUCIING LOBBYING ACTIVITIES TO REGISTER AS A LOBBYIST WrM THE CITY CLERK. PRIOR TO ENGAGING IN LOBBYING ACTIVITES BEFORE CITY STAFF, BOARDS, COKWTiEES AND THE C3TY COMMISSION. A COPY OF SAID ORDINANCE IS AVAnABLE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK (MIAMI CITY HAIL.). LOCATED AT 3500 PAN AMERICAN DRIVE, MIAMI, FLORIDA, 33133. NOM =APPL'IC4TIOtYMUSTBE ?YPEWRIT'TFrYAND SIGNED ITV BIACsY1Ng Biscayne Bay Tower, L L C I, Lucia A. Dougherty, on b e h a 1 f ' o f , hereby apply to the Director of the Department of Planning and Development of the City of Miami for approval of a Major Use Special Permit under the provisions of Article 17 of the City of Miami Zoning Ordinance. Property Address: ADDroximately 501 N E 36th Street Nature of proposed use (be specific): A Major Use Special Permit pursuant to Articles 5 and 17 and Section 914 of the Zoning Ordinance. A Class I Permit for FAA approval, t e pool and outdoor recrea , o i Class II Permit for development between Biscayne Bay and the first dedicated public right-of-way and access from a public street with widths greater than 25 feet and C-r-ass Il ror a zz zeec oac =up -waiver. bee accacnea asniail- J. APPLICATION MATERIALS I attach the following in support and explanation of the application: :CT 1. Two original surveys, prepared by a State of Florida Registered Land Surveyor within one year from the date of application. :CX 2. Affidavit disclosing ownership of property covered by application and disclosure of interest form (attach j forms 4-83 and 4a-83 to application). Page 1 of 2 zi a C A t'r IW APPLICATION MATERIALS (conNnuec) I attach the following in support and explanation of the application: 3. Certified list of owners of real estate within a 375-foot radius from the outside boundaries of property (attach form 6-83 to application). Z; 4. Maps of the: a) Existing zoning designation. b) Adopted comprehensive plan designation for areas on and around the property. 5. General location map showing relation to the site or activity to major streets, schools, existing utilities, shopping areas, important physical features in and adjoining the project, and the Iike. U 6. Concept PIan a) Site plan and relevant information per Section 13042-Id-h. b) Relationships to surrounding existing and proposed futures use and activities, systems and facilities, per Section 170232a. c) How concept affects existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan principles and designations; tabulation of any required variances, special permits, changes of zoning or exemptions, per Section 170232b. O 7. Developmental Impact Study (an application for development approval for a Development of Regional Impact may substitute). rJ 8. Other (be specific): (fit 9. Fee of S in, ann , for the Major Use Special Permit, based on current fee schedule as set forth in Chapter 62 of the Code of the City of Miami, as amended. Ox 10. Additional fee of S —0— , for any required special permits, changes of zoning or variances set forth in chapter 62 of the Code of the City of Miami, as amended. Mw Total Fee: S 3 0, 0 0 0 Signature f jg_ Name Lucia A. Dougherty Address 1221 Brickell Avenue, Miami, F1 33131 Phone/Fax (In5i 579 --D.60!3 [105) 579-0717 Date �u ` '2 ICKA5 FNAL APPROVAL OF THIS APPLICATION FOR MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT SHALL CONSIST OF AN EXECUTED RESOLUTION BY T NflA.Ml CITY COMMISSION AND A DEVELOPMENT ORDER ATTACHED THERETO WHICH SPECIFIES THE CONDITIONS UNDER WHICH Ti AAJOR USE SPECIAL FER.NQT APPLICATION IS APPROVED. IF -APPROVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION, SAID RESOLUTION ANU )EVELOPMENT ORDER SHALL, UPON EXECUTION THEREOF, BE TRANSMITTED TO THE OWNER OR AUTHORIZED AGENT AT THE ADDRESS SPECIFIED ABOVE. Page 2 of 2 - t„r Exhibit "1" Approximately 501 N.E. 36 ST (ZONED - R-4/SD-20) MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT, as per City of Miami Zoning Ordinance 11,000 as amended Article 17 section 1701 for the following: 0 Increase Development Bonus, to allow an increase of up to 25% of the allowed number of dwelling units requesting 18.54% ( maximum of 302 units x 18.54% = 358 units ; 56 extra units x 1090 average square feet/unit = 61,040 square feet) by contribution to the Affordable Housing Trust Fund ( Total contribution is 61,040 x $6.67 = $407,136.80 } (Article 9 section 914). ® Planned Unit Development, allowing an increase of 20% of the FAR allowed by the underlying district (Article 5 section 503). ■ Residential Development in excess of 200 units. ■ Development with an excess of 500 parking spaces. The Major Use encompasses the following special permits: • Class I special permit for FAA clearance (Article 9 sec 915.2). • Class I for swimming pool (Article 9 sec 906.6). • Class I for valet service (Article 9 sec 917.1.2). • Class II special permit for development between Biscayne Bay and the first dedicated public right-of-way. (Article 15 sec 1511). • Class II for access from a public street with widths greater than 25 feet (Art 9 Sec 908.2). • Class II for reduction of required 23 ft parking backup space, proposed 22 ft (reduction of Parking Guides & Standards ) 9 9 o 307 Approximately 501 NE 36 ST page 2 of2 Subject to: M Re plat ofproperty & street closure (NE 6 & 7 Avenue). ■ Obtaining an FAA letter permitting the proposed height. *cecPhee) January 28, 1999 99- 307 ao- AFFIDAVIT 'ATE OF FLORIDA } )SS COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE } Before me, the undersigned authority, this day personally appeared Lucia A. Dougherty who being by me first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and says: 1. That he/she is the owner, or the legal representative of the owner, submitting the accompanying application for a public hearing as required.by the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, affecting the real property located in the City of Miami, as described and listed on the pages attached fo this affidavit and made a part*thereof. 2. That all owners which he/she represents, if any, have given their full and complete permission for him/her to act in his/her behalf for the change or modification of a classification or regulation of zoning as set out in the accompanying petition. 3. That the pages attached hereto and made a part of this affidavit contain the current names, mailing addresses, )hone numbers and legal descriptions for the real property of which he/she is the owner or legal representative. 4. The facts as represented in the application and documents submitted in conjunction with this affidavit are true and correct. Further Afr�ant sayeth not. all'dq Applicant's Signature STATE OF FLORIDA Lucia A. Dougherty COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE II The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this bo day of January 19 9 9, by Lucia A. Dougherty who is personally known to me ef6wito lies P and who did (did not) take an oath. 7 au Name: Notary Public -State of Florida Commission Nc OFFICLALNarARYSEAL MARISOL R GONZALEZ My Commissio i'iMUCSt'ATEOFFLORMA COMMMION NO. CC77LUS t MY COMMLSStON UP. SE" 17,2002 g0- �07 0 CONTRACT PURCHASER Owner's Name Biscayne Bay Tower, L L C Mailing Address 700 W. 51st Street, Miami Beach, Florida 33140 Zip Code Telephone Number (305) 864-8022 Legal Description: See attached Exhibit 114" Owner's Name Mailing Address Zip Code Telephone Number Legal Description: ')wner's Name Mailing Address —Zip Code Telephone Number Legal Description: Any other real estate property owned individually, jointly, or severally (by corporation, partnership or privately) within 375 feet of the subject site is listed as follows: Street Address See attached Exhibit "6" Street Address Street Address i i f4 Legal Description Legal Description Legal Description 9 9 - '307 c I OWNER'S LIST Biscayne Bay Tower, L.L.C., a Florida limited liability company Owner's Name Mai ling Address 700 W. 51 Street, Miami Beach, F1 ___Zip Code 33140 Telephone Number (305) 864-8022 Legal Description: See attached Exhibit Owner's Name Mailing Address Zip Code_ Telephone Number Legal Description: Owner's Name Mailing Address Zip Code Telephone Number Legal Description: Any other real estate property owned individually, jointly, or severally (by corporation, partnership or privately) within 375 feet of the subject site is listed as follows: Street Address Legal Description !Tf� a R Street Address Street Address a 'W Legal Description Legal Description i OWNER'S LIST Owner's Name ..tailing Address Zip Code Telephone Number Legal Description: Owner's Name Conception and Rosa Vasquez, his wife c/o Century 21, 12681 S. Dixie Highway, Miami,eF1 33156 Mailing Address Telephone Number (3 0 5) 2 3 5- 2 6 21 Legal Description: Lot 7, Block 2, Plat Book 18, Page 73 of the Public Records of Miami- nade Ccunty, Florida. Owner's Name Mailing Address Zip Code lephone Number Legal Description: Any other real estate property owned individually, jointly, or severally (by corporation, partnership or privately) within 375 feet of the subject site is listed as follows: Street Address Legal Description None Street Address Street Address L Legal Description Legal Description 90- 60"7 h. DISCLOSURE OF OWNERSM 1. Legal description and street address of subject real property: See attached Exhibit "2". Approximately 501 N.E. 36th Street, Miami, Florida 2. Owner(s) of subject real property and percentage of ownership. Note: Section 2-618 of the Code of the City of Miami requires disclosure of all parties having a financial interest, either direct or indirect, in the subject matter of a presentation, request or petition to the City Commission. Accordingly, question #2 requires disclosure of shareholders of corporations, beneficiaries of trusts, and/or any other interested parties, together with their addresses and proportionate interest. See attached Exhibit "311. 3. Legal description and street address of any real property (a) owned by any party listed in answer to question #2, and (b) located within 375 feet of the subject real property. None 9 ? Owner or Attorney for Owner STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this (100_ day of _ _ .1 a n I, a ry 19.99 by Lucia A. Dougherty who is personally known o me or who has produced - as identification and who did (did not) take an oath. Name: / Notary Public -State of Florida Com My mmi RYSEAL NOTARY PUBLIC SPATE OF FioRIDA COMMIS&ON NO. CCTTI348 MY COMMISSION W. SEPr 17 30-- 007 ------------- ------------------------- -- LEGAL DESCRIPTION: The Land is described as follows: Lots 1-8, Block 2, and Lots 1-8, Block 3, of WEST POINT, according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plot Book 18, at Page 73, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida; Less the following described parcels: A) The following portion acquired by Order of Taking filed January 25, 1960 in Official Records Book 1866, at Page 182, described as follows: Lot 6, in Block 3, of WEST POINT, as per plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 18. at Page 73. of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows: Begin at the Northeast corner of said Lot 6; thence Westerly along the Northerly line of said Lul 6, u distance of 105.00 feet to the Northwest corner of said Lot 6; thence South 82 degrees 29 minutes 58 seconds East, a distance of 105.79 feet to a point on the Easterly line of said Lot 6; thence Northerly along said Easterly line, a distance of 13.00 feet to the Point of Beginning. 8) A strip of land 5 feet in width across the South end of the following described lots, to -wit: Lots 1, 2, 3 and 4 of Block 2, and Lots 1, 2, 3, and 4 of Block 3, all according to the plat of West Point Subdivision, as recorded in Plot Book 18, Page 73 of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida. C) That part of Lot 1, in Block 2 of West Point Subdivision, according to the Plot recorded in Plot Book 18, Page 73 of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida, lying Southwest a curve conceve to the Northeast, having a radius of 25 feet, the North end of said curve being tangent to the East right of way line of N.E. 5th Avenue, and the East end of said curve being tangent to a line 5 feet North of and parallel to the South line of said Lot 1, AND D) That part of Lot 4, in Block 2 of West Point Subdivision, according to the Plat recorded in Plot Book 18, Page 73, of the public records of Miami -Dade County, Florida, lying Southeast of a curve concave to the Northwest having a radius of 25 feet, the North end of said curve being tangent to the West right of way line of N.E. 6th Avenue, and the West end of said curve being tangent to a line 5 feet North of and parallel to the South line of said Lot 4, AND E) That part of Lot 1, in Block 3 of West Point Subdivision, according to the Plat recorded in Plat Book 18, Page 73 of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida, lying Southwest of a curve concave to the Northeast, having a radius of 25 feet, the North end of said curve being tangent to the East right of way line of N.E. 6th Avenue, and the East end of said curve being tangent to a line 5 feet North of and parallel to the South line of said Lot 1, AND F) That part of Lot 4, in Block 3 of West Point Subdivision, according to the Plat recorded in Plat Book 18, Page 73. of the public records of Miami -Dade County, Florida,lying Southeast of a curve concave to the Northwest having a radius of 25 feet, the North end of said curve being tangent to the West right of way line of N.E. 6th Avenue, and the West end of said curve being tangent to a line 5 feet North of and parallel to the South line of said Lot 4. �I eu, 9 9 - 30'7 Exhibit "3" DISCLOSURE OF OWNERSHIP 1. Biscayne Bay Tower, LLC is owned 100% by William A. Pryor 700 W. 51" Street, Miami Beach, Florida 33140 2. All other property owners are individuals listed on the Owner's List. S9- 307 Exhibit "4" West Point Sub -Division- Block 2 Folio # Lot# Owner's Name Address 0132 19 020 0020 7 C. Vasquez & Rosa 3627 N.E. 5 Avenue 99-- 307 t- SLOCK#3 Exhibit "5" BISCAYNE BAY TOWER FOLIO#'S FOLIO# LOT# 0132190200-140 1 0132109200-150 2 0132109200-160 3 0132109200-170 4 0132109200-180 5 0132109200-190 6 0132190200-200 7 0132190200-210 8 BLOCK#2 0132190200-060 1 0132190200-070 2 0132190200-080 3 0132190200-090 4 0132190200-100 5 0132190200-110 6 0132190200-120 7 0132190200-130 8 BBTILEGAUGREENBERGIPARDOIFOLIO #1-7-98 1u. (19 - 6 0 7 BISCAYNE BAY PROJECT BISCAYNIE BAY TOWER, LLC. ASSEMBLAGE/OWN ERSIIIP February 1999 WEST POINT SUB -DIVISION — BLOCK 2 Folio # Lot # Owner's Name Address 0132 19 020 0060 1 Biscayne Bay Tower, LLC. 501 NE 36 St. 01 3219 020 0070 2 Biscayne Bay Tower LLC. 513 NE 36 St. 01 3219 020 0080 3 Biscayne Bay Tower LLC. 525 NE 36 St. 013219 020 0090 4 Bisc A ne Bay Tower LLC. 3600 NE 6 Ave 013219 020 0100 5 Biscayne Bay Tower LLC. 3618 NE 6 Ave 01 3219 0200110 6 Biscayne Bay Tower LLC. 3626 NE 6 Ave 01 3219 020 0130 8 Biscayne Bay Tower, LLC. 3619 NE 5 Ave WEST POINT SUB -DIVISION - BLOCK 3 .01 3219 020 0140 1 Bisda ne Bay Tower, LLC 601 NE 36 St. 01 3219 020 0150 2 Biscayne Bay Tower LLC 615 NE 36 St. 01 3219 020 0160 3 Biscayne Bay Tower LLC 625 NE 35 St. 0132 19 020 0170 4 Biscayne Bay Tower LLC 3620 NE 7 Ave 01 3219 020 0180 5 Biscayne Bay Tower LLC 3620 NE 7 Ave 01 3219 020 0190 6 Biscayne Bay Tower LLC 3630 NE 7 Ave 01 3219 020 0200 7 Biscayne Bay Tower LLC 3635 NE 6 Ave 0132 19 020 0210 8 Biscayne Bay Tower, LLC 3625 NE 6 Ave HWassembtagesche&M. mutp updata 24-99 I 4 BISCAYNE BAY TOWER PROJECT MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT Prepared by: EG52 CORPORATION FORTIN, LEAVY, SKILES, INC. GREENBERG TRAURIG, P.A. SHARPTON, BRUNSON & COMPANY, P.A. THE SIEGER ARCHITECTURAL PARTNERSHIP TRANSPORT ANAYLSIS PROFESSIONALS February 1999 99- 307 A- T�• A t CONTENTS February, 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Project Information A. Application for a Major Use Special Permit B. Disclosure of Ownership C. Ownership Affidavit D. Directory of Project Principals E. Project Data Sheet F. Zoning Atlas Page 15 Il. Project Description A. Zoning Ordinance No. 11000 1. Section 1304.2.1 Applications Forms; Supplementary Materials 2. Section 1702.2.1 General Report 3. Section 1702.2.2 Major Use Special Permit Concept Plan 4. Section 1702.2.3 Developmental Impact Study III. Supporting Documents Tab 1 Minority Construction Employment Plan Tab 2 Traffic Impact Analysis Tab 3 Site Utility Study Tab 4 Economic Impact Study Tab 5 Survey of Property Tab 6 Drawings Submitted 99- 307 r" INFORMATION BISCAYNE BAY TOWER MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT PROJECT INFORMATION ARTICLE I. Project Information A. Application for a Major Use Special Permit B. Disclosure of Ownership C. Ownership Affidavit D. Directory of Project Principals E. Project Data Sheet F. Zoning Atlas Page 15 99- 30"7 7. %.- CITY OF MIAMI DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT IT IS INTENDED THAT MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMITS BE REQUIRED WHERE SPECIFIED USES AND/OR OCCUPANCIES INVOLVE MATTERS DEEMED TO BE OF CITYWIDE OR AREA -WIDE IMPORTANCE. THE CITY COMMISSION SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR DETERMINATIONS ON APPLICATIONS FOR MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMITS. (SEE ARTICLE 17 OF ORDINANCE 11000, AS AMENDED, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAW, FLORIDA) THE CITY COMMISSION SHALL REFER ALL APPLICATIONS FOR MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMITS TO THE PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD AND TO THE DIRECTOR OF THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT FOR RECOMMENDATIONS, AND MAY MAKE REFERRALS TO AGENCIES, BODIES, OR OFFICERS, EITHER THROUGH THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT OR DIRECTLY, FOR REVIEW, ANALYSIS ANDIOR TECHNICAL FINDINGS AND DETERMINATIONS AND REPORTS THEREON. (SEE SECTION 1301.5 OF ORDINANCE 11000, AS AMENDED, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA) SECTION 2-653 OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, AS AMENDED, GENERALLY REQUIRES ANY PERSON WHO RECEIVES COMPENSATION, REMUNERATION OR EXPENSES FOR CONDUCTING LOBBYING ACTIVITIES TO REGISTER AS A LOBBYIST WITH THE CITY CLERK, PRIOR TO ENGAGING IN LOBBYING ACTIVITIES BEFORE CITY STAFF, BOARDS, COMMITTEES AND THE CITY COMMISSION. A COPY OF SAID ORDINANCE IS AVAILABLE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK GaAMI CITY HALL), LOCATED AT 3500 PAN AMERICAN DRIVE, MIAMI, FLORIDA, 33133. NOTE. THIS APPLICA TIONMUST BE TYPEWRITTEN AND SIGNED INBLACKINK Biscayne Bay Tower, L L C I, Lucia A. Dougherty, on behalf of hereby apply to the Director of the Department of Planning and Development of the City of Miami for approval of a Major Use Special Permit under the provisions of Article 17 of the City of Miami Zoning Ordinance. Property Address: Avoroximately 501 N E 36th Street Nature of proposed use (be specific): A Major Use Special Permit pursuant to Articles 5 and 17 and Section 914 of the Zoning Ordinance. A Class I Permit for FAA approval, the poolan outdoor recreational , Class II Permit for development between Biscayne Bay and the first dedicated public right-of-way and access from a public street with widths greater than 25 feet and Class II for a 22 leet oac -up w -ele--a-t=actled 7X17t APPLICATION MATERIALS I attach the following in support and explanation of the application: 1. Two original surveys, prepared by a State of Florida Registered Land Surveyor within one year from the date of application. 2. Affidavit disclosing ownership of property covered by application and disclosure of interest form (attach forms 4-83 and 4a-83 to application). Page 1 of 2 9 9 307 r,-, IW APPLICATION ATATERIALS (continued) 1 attach the following in support and explanation of the application: 3. Certified list of owners of real estate within a 375-foot radius from the outside boundaries of property (attach form 6-33 to application). 4. Maps of the: a) Existing zoning designation. b) Adopted comprehensive plan designation for areas on and around the property. 5. General location map showing relation to the site or activity to major streets, schools, existing utilities, shopping areas, important physical features in and adjoining the project, and the like. 6. Concept Plan a) Site plan and relevant information per Section 1304.2.1d-h. b) Relationships to SUITounding existing and proposed futures uses and activities, systems and facilities, per Section 1702.3.2a. c) How concept affects existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan principles and designations; tabulation of any required variances, special permits, changes of zoning or exemptions, per Section 1702.3.2b. ❑ 7. Developmental Impact Study (an application for development approval for a Development of Regional Impact may substitute). ❑ S. Other (be specific): lit 9. Fee of $ 3n nnn , for the Major Use Special Permit, based on current fee schedule as set forth in Chapter 62 of the Code of the City of Miami, as amended. Ox 10. Additional fee of S -0- , for any required special permits, changes of zoning or variances set forth in chapter 62 of the Code of the City of Miami, as amended. �- Total Fee: S 3 0, 0 0 0 Signature Name Lucia A. Dougherty Address 1221 Brickell Avenue, Miami, F1 33131 Phone/Fax _-C3n5) 579-06063 (305) 579-0717 Date -!-Ley FINIAL APPROVAL OF THIS APPLICATION FOR MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT SHALL CONSIST OF AN EXECUTED RESOLUTION BY THE MlAaMl CITY COMMISSION AND A DEVELOPMENT ORDER ATTACHED THERETO WHICH SPECIFIES THE CONDITIONS UNDER WHICH THIS dAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT APPLICATION IS APPROVED; IF APPROVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION, SAID RESOLUTION AND hEVELOPMENT ORDER SHALL, UPON EXECUTION THEREOF, BE TRANSMITTED TO THE OWNER OR AUTHORIZED AGENT AT THE ADDRESS SPECIFIED ABOVE. Page 2 of 2 99- 307 A..- T" I Exhibit "I" Approximately 501 N.E. 36 ST (ZONED - R-4/SD-20) MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT, as per City of Miami Zoning Ordinance 11,000 as amended Article 17 section 1701 for the following: ■ Increase Development Bonus, to allow an increase of up to 25% of the allowed number of dwelling units requesting 18.54% ( maximum of 302 units x 18.54% = 358 units ; 56 extra units x 1090 average square feet/unit = 61,040 square feet) by contribution to the Affordable Housing Trust Fund ( Total contribution is 61,040 x $6.67 = $407,136.80 ) (Article 9 section 914). Planned Unit Development, allowing an increase of 20% of the FAR allowed by the underlying district (Article 5 section 503). ® Residential Development in excess of 200 units. 0 Development with an excess of 500 parking spaces. The Major Use encompasses the following special permits: • Class I special permit for FAA clearance (Article 9 sec 915.2). • Class I for swimming pool (Article 9 sec 906.6). • Class I for valet service (Article 9 sec 917.1.2). • Class II special permit for development between Biscayne Bay and the first dedicated public right-of-way. (Article 15 sec 1511). • Class II for access from a public street with widths greater than 25 feet (Art 9 Sec 908.2). • Class II for reduction of required 23 ft parking backup space, proposed 22 ft (reduction of Parking Guides & Standards ) 99-- 307 { Approximately 501 NE 36 ST page 2 of 2 Subject to: ■ Re -plat of property & street closure (NE 6 & 7 Avenue). ■ Obtaining an FAA letter permitting the proposed height. Jo ce 1'VlcPhee January 28, 1999 1w 307 • DISCLOSURE OF OWNERSHIP 1. Legal description and street address of subject real property: See attached Exhibit "2". Approximately 501 N.E. 36th Street, Miami, Florida 2. Owner(s) of subject real property and percentage of ownership. Note: Section 2-618 of the Code of the City of Miami requires disclosure of all parties having a financial interest, either direct or indirect, in the subject matter of a presentation, request or petition to the City Commission. Accordingly, question 92 requires disclosure of shareholders of corporations, beneficiaries of trusts, and/or any other interested parties, together with their addresses and proportionate interest. See attached Exhibit 11311. 3. Legal description and street address of any real property (a) owned by any party listed in answer to question #2, and (b) located within 375 feet of the subject real property. None Owner or Attorney or Owner STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this (Il ' day of Ta n„ n ry 1933_, by Lucia A. Dougherty who is personally known o me or who has produced as identification and who did (did not) take an oath. Name: Notary Public -State of Florida Com My mmi YSEAL NOTARY PUBUC STATE of FLORIDA COMME61ON No. CCM348 MY COMMISSION W. SEPr 17 99- 307 1;1 AFFIDAVIT 'ATE OF FLORIDA } ` } SS COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE } Before me, the undersigned authority, this day personally appeared Lucia A. Dougherty who being by me first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and says: 1. That he/she is the owner, or the legal representative of the owner, submitting the accompanying application for a public hearing as required by the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, affecting the real property located in the City of Miami, as described and listed on the pages attached to this affidavit and made a part'thereof. 2. That all owners which he/she represents, if any, have given their full and complete permission for him/her to act in his/her behalf for the change or modification of a classification or regulation of zoning as set out in the accompanying petition. 3. That the pages attached hereto and made a part of this affidavit contain the current names, mailing addresses, . ' )hone numbers and legal descriptions for the real property of which he/she is the owner or legal representative. 4. The facts as represented in the application and documents submitted in conjunction with this affidavit are true and correct. Further Affant sayeth not. i Applicant's Signature STATE OF FLORIDA Lucia A. Dougherty COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this LO day of January 19 9 9 , by Lucia A. Dougherty who is personally known to me ar-rrko-ha and who did (did not) take an oath. Name: Notary Public -State of Florida Commission N .: OFFIcla NClFjMY_SEA MARISOL R CONZALEZ My Commissio tZnkkTW5L1CSTATFOFFLORIDA COMMISSION NO. CC771348 k MY COMMLSSION EXP. SEPr 17 002 Y`f xt 99- 307 i 11 CONTRACT PURCHASER Owner's Name Biscayne Bay Tower, L L C Mailing Address 700 W. 51st Street, Miami Beach, Florida 33140 Zip Code Telephone Number 005) 864-8022 Legal Description: . See attached Exhibit "4" Owner's Name Mailing Address Zip Code, Telephone Number Legal Description: -)wner's Name Mailing Address _Zip Code Telephone Number Legal Description: Any other real estate property owned individually, jointly, or severally (by corporation, partnership or privately) within 375 feet of the subject site is listed as follows: Street Address Legal Description See attached Exhibit "6" Street Address Street Address I4' Legal Description Legal Description 9 9 - 307 OWNER'S LIST Biscayne Bay Tower, L.L.C., a Florida limited liability company Owner's Name Mailing Address 700 W. 51 Street, Miami Beach, F1 33140 Zip Code Telephone Number (305) 864-8022 Legal Description: See attached Exhibit Owner's Name Mailing Address Telephone Number Legal Description: Owner's Name Mailing Address Telephone Number Legal Description: Zip Code Code Any other real estate property owned individually, jointly, or severally (by corporation, partnership or privately) within 375 feet of the subject site is listed as follows: Street Address Legal Description XT n La Street Address Street Address Legal Description Legal Description +ps _ OWNER'S LIST Owner's Name ..tailing Address Telephone Number Legal Description: Zip Code. Owner's Name Conception and Rosa Vasquez, his wife Mailing Address c/o Century 21, 12681 S. Dixie Highway, Miami, F1 Lip Code 33156 Telephone Number (3 0 5) 2 3 5 —2 6 2 1 Legal Description: Lot 7, Block 2, Plat Book 18, Page 73 of the Public Records of Miami- nad.e Ccunty, Florida. Owner's Name Mailing Address Zip Code !ephone Number Legal Description: Any other real estate property owned individually, jointly, or severally (by corporation, partnership or privately) within 375 feet of the subject site is listed as follows: Street None Address Legal Description Street Address Legal Description Street Address Legal Description 9 9 - 307 I%- V- 4 LEGAL. DESCRIPTION: The Land is described as follows: Lots 1-8, Block 2, and Lots 1-8, Block 3, of WEST POINT, according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 18, at Page 73, of the Public Records of Miami —Dade County, Florida; Less the following described parcels: A) The following portion acquired by Order of Taking filed January 25, 1960 in Official Records Book 1866. at Page 182. described as follows: Lot 6, in Block 3, of WEST POINT, as per plot thereof recorded in Plot Book 18. at Page 73. of the Public Records of Miarni—Dade County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows: Begin at the Northeast corner of said Lot 6; thence Westerly along the Northerly line of said Lot 6, u distance of 105.00 feet to the Northwest corner of said Lot 6; thence South 82 degrees 29 minutes 58 seconds East, o distance of 105.79 feet to a point on the Easterly line of said Lot 6; thence Northerly along said Easterly line, a distance of 13.00 feet to the Point of Beginning. B) A strip of land 5 feet in width across the South end of the following described lots, to —wit: Lots 1, 2, 3 and 4 of Block 2, and Lots 1, 2. 3, and 4 of Block 3, all according to the plot of West Point Subdivision, as recorded in Plat Book 18. Page 73 of the Public Records / of Miami —Dade County, Florida. C) That part of Lot 1, in Block 2 of West Point Subdivision, according to the Plat recorded in Plat Book 18, Page 73 of the Public Records of Miami —Dade County, Florida, lying Southwest of a curve concave to the Northeast, having a radius of 25 feet. the North end of said curve being tangent to the East right of way line of N.E. 5th Avenue, and the East end of said curve being tangent to a line 5 feet North of and parallel to the South line of said Lot 1, AND D) That part of Lot 4, in Block 2 of West Point Subdivision, according to the Plat recorded in Plat Book 18, Page 73, of the public records of Miami —Dade County, Florida, lying Southeast of a curve concave to the Northwest having a radius of 25 feet, the North end of said curve being tangent to the West right of way line of N.E. 6th Avenue, and the West end of said curve being tangent to a line 5 feet North of and parallel to the South line of said Lot 4, AND E) That part of Lot 1, in Block 3 of West Point Subdivision, according to the Plat recorded in Plat Book 18. Page 73 of the Public Records of Miami —Dade County, Florida, lying Southwest of a curve concave to the Northeast, having a radius of 25 feet, the North end of said curve being tangent to the East right of way line of N.E. 6th Avenue, and the East end of said curve being tangent to a line 5 feet North of and parallel to the South line of said Lot 1, AND F) That part of Lot 4, in Block 3 of West Point Subdivision, according to the Plat recorded in Plot Book 18, Page 73, of the public records of Miami —Dade County, Florida,lying Southeast of a curve concave to the Northwest having a radius of 25 feet, the North end of said curve being tangent to the West right of way line of N.E. 6th Avenue, and the West end of said curve being tangent to a line 5 feet North of and parallel to the South line of said Lot 4. q q - .l 0 f t,„„ Exhibit "3" DISCLOSURE OF OWNERSHIP 1. Biscayne Bay Tower, LLC is owned 100% by William A. Pryor 700 W. 51" Street, Miami Beach, Florida 33140 2. All other property owners are individuals listed on the Owner's List. LIM 9 9 - 307 w- Exhibit "4" West Point Sub -Division- Block 2 Folio # Lot# Owner's Name Address 01 32 19 020 0020 7 C. Vasquez & Rosa 3627 N.E. 5 Avenue m BLOCK#3 Exhibit "5" BISCAYNE BAY TOWER FOLIO#'S FOLIO# LOT# 0132190200-140 1 0132109200-150 2 0132109200-160 3 0132109200-170 4 0132109200-180 5 0132109200-190 S 0132190200-200 7 0132190200-210 8 BLOCK#2 0132190200-060 1 0132190200-070 2 0132190200-080 3 0132190200-090 4 0132190200-100 5 0132190200-110 6 0132190200-120 7 0132190200-130 8 BUILEGALIGREENBERGIPARDOIFOLIO #1-7-98 '4- 99- 30'7 — V• BISCAYNE BAY PROJECT BISCAYNE BAY TOWER � LLC. ASSEMBLAGE/OWNERSHIP February 1999 VILEST POINT SUB -DIVISION — BLOCK 2 Folio # Lot # !Owner's Name Address 01 3219 020 0060 1 Biscayne Bay Tower, LLC. 501 NE 36 St. 01 32 19 020 0070 2 Bisca ne Bay Tower LLC. 513 NE 36 St. 01 3219 020 0080 3 Biscayne Ba Tower LLC. 525 NE 36 St, 01 3219 020 0090 4 Biscayne Bay Tourer LLC. 3600 NE 6 Ave 01 3219 020 0100 5 Biscayne Bay Tower LLC. 3618 NE 6 Ave 0132 19 020 0110 6 Biscayne Bay Tower, LLC. 3626 NE 6 Ave 0132 19 020 0130 18 1 Biscayne Bay Tower, LLC. 3619 NE 5 Ave WEST POINT SUB -DIVISION - BLOCK 3 0132 19 020 0140 1 Biscayne Bay Tower, LLC 601 NE 36 St. 0132 19 020 0150 2 Biscayne Bay Tower LLC 615 NE 36 St. 01 32 19 020 0160 3 Biscayne Bay Tower LLC 625 NE 36 St. 0132 19 020 0170 4 Biscayne Bay Tower LLC 3620 NE 7 Ave 0132 19 020 0180 5 Biscayne Bay Tower LLC 3620 NE 7 Ave -01 32 19 020 0190 j 6 Biscayne Bay Tower LLC 3630 NE 7 Ave 0132 19 020 0200 17 Biscayne Ba Tower LLC 3635 NE 6 Ave 0132 19 020 0210 8 Biscayne Bay Tower, LLC 3626 NE 6 Ave BWxswmbUgmchcdnlcd. =sp up4ta 3-4-99 t4, BISCAYNE BAY TOWER MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT Project Data Sheet 1. Legal Description: Lots 1-8, Block 2, and Lots 1-8, Block 3, of WEST POINT, according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 18, at page 73, of the Public Records of Miami - Dade County, Florida. Said lard lying and being in the City of Miami. Florida. 2. Address: Approximately 501 N.E. 361h Street Miami, Florida 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Zoning Classification: City of Miami R-4 / SD —20 Lot Area: Gross Area: Net Area: Density: Units/Acre Allowed Units/Acre Provided Allowable Area: Floor Area Ratio (FAR) Loading Berths: 8. Height: Tower Parking Structure 4.259 acres or 185,534 sq.ft. 2.013 acres or 87,672 sq.ft. 150 units/acre 178 units/acre (358 total units) 1.72 + 20% P.U.D. Bonus alloN ✓ed Required: 5 loading berths 12 ft. x 55 ft. x 15 ft. Provided: 4 loading berths 12 ft. x 55 ft. x 15 ft. 8 loading berths 10 ft. x 20 ft. No height limitation 360 ft. provided (35 floors, including deck) 40 ft. 4 in. (5 floors, including subterranean) 99- 307 9. Building Footprint: Maximum Allowed Provided 10. No. of Parking Spaces 11. Setbacks: N.E. 36`h Street N.E. 5`h Avenue 1-195 N.E. 7`h Avenue 74,214 sq.ft. (40 %) 5 9,72 3 sq.ft. (32.19% ) 418 Regular Spaces Required 516 Regular Spaces Provided 9 Handicap Spaces Required 9 Handicap Spaces Provided 427 Total Spaces Required 525 Total Spaces Provided 15 ft. Required 15 ft. Provided 20 ft Required 20 ft Provided 5 ft Required 5 ft.Provided 5 ft. Required 5 ft. Provided (after closure) 99- 30'7 Project Summary for Biscayne Bay Tower January 28, 1999 PPr1.IFCT r.PITER1A . 70NING / SETBACKS tY�ar.K.�. NR t�� w4 f�"-'•1^ ,±t �f: yi �{'Sf SITE h Sw1:' 4 :'. ; ' s�_ l-1'fi8'F {7`mf %a.F� . tY 1,'1�Q"';1 "'EM �..�(r" Q TiiST+':1 .',l' MUREQU1REDiALLR ABLE- W . ,c 2 �PROVIDEDl ZONING DISTRICT R-4/SD-20 BASE F.A.R. 1.72 1.72 NET LOT AREA - NET LOT DIMF_NSIOIdS GROSS LOT AREA GR06S F.A.R. — --- -- - PLUS 2097.P.U.D. DEV. BONUS_ _ TOTAL F.A.R. REQUIRED_ -- - PROJECT-F.A.R. REQUESTED - _ _ 87,672 S.F. ((2.013 acres) 479'-11" x 182'-7" _.— — 1.72 x G.L.A._ _ 319,118 x .20 319,118 63,824 —` 382,942 434,468 SETBAC?:: :� apif��r��9�J.3.'�y.G���S,i.,l�t" SETBACK FOR N.E 36TH STREET SETBACK FOR N.E. 5TH AVENUE SETBACK FOR I-195--_ _ -- - -- SETBACK FOR N.E. 7Tl- AVENUE ---- -------..--- - -- - --- - 15'-0" 20'-0" —� 20'-0"� -5'-0" _ -_--- 5'-01. - 5'-0" 5'-0" - ------ —After Closure 99- 30"7 Project Summary for Biscayne Bay Tower Anniinrv'M 109.Cl '41 Bit NMI ItIMOR M ZR M MI , IT" �P YP! '5-S.. -GRO S:(S- &M.BREAKDOWN,'!i!',' NMI - Subterranean Storage,Bike Room, Trash Room 0 5,677 5,877 Stairs & Elevator Hoishvays 0 1,224- 1,224 LTTOFL!� 'Subterranean P`ark-.Struct. Parking, Loading Dock 0 51.884 51,884 58.985 Lobby Level Lobby Level Park. Struct. Lobby, Elevator Lobty, _Ee�strm. Function rm., Office & Service Stairs, Elevator Hoist., Trash Chute Parking, Service 6,01.2 0 0 6,012 4,734 4.734 0 0 1.881 44,440 1,881 44,440 57.0671 Mezzanine Level Card Room, Sto e Stairs, Elevator Hoist., Trash Chute Parkin 0 0 -6 3,830 3,830 Mezz. Level Park. Struct. 1,899 --7�C�2-0 1,899 50,320 56,049 3rd Level 3rd Level Park. Struct. Leasing Office, Bus. Center, Nursery Stairs, Elevator Hoist., Trash Chute 0 3,830 3.830 - 0 1,916 1,916 Parking 01 50,142 50.142 55,888 41h Level 9 Residential Units 9,500 0 9,500 41lil-ev el -Park -Struct. Common Corridor, Storage Stairs, Elevator Hoist., Trash Chute Balconies,P a-ti--o-'s,-E--xt.-C*'o-rri-dor-s Parking. Spa Deck 1,739 2,429 1,803 2,767 4,168 1 01 0 1,603-1 2,767 -61-,5-53 -'--d -- 43,315 43.315 5th Level 9-Residential Units, Corn. Int Corridor 10,673 0 10,673 Function rm., Restroorns 0 1,434 1,434.-- 56-Level -Pool -be-c'k- Stairs, Elevator Hoist., Trash Chute Balconies & Exterior Corridors 0 1,469 1,484 33.820 1,469 -- -1,4-8�4- 33,820 - - -- - 48,880 Pool -De-ck. Tennis Court 0 6th - 9th Level 10 Residential Units 0 Floors)-- 48,344 0 48,344 Stairs, Elevator Hoist., Trash Chute 0 -t 5,392 5,392 Balconies & Exterior Corridor 9.024 9,024 62,760 1 10th Level 12 Residential Units, Meter rm. 14,328 100 14,428 Stairs, Elevator Hoist., Trash Chute 0 911 911 Balconies & Exterior Corridor b 3.087 3.087 18,426 11th -13th Level 12ResidentialUnits (3 Floors),Meter 42,984 300 43,284 - Stairs, Elevator, Trash, Meter rm. Balconies & Exterior Corridor 0 2,733 2,733 9.441 55,458 0 9,441 14th - 33rd Level 12 Residential Units (20 Floors),Mete 286,560 2.000 288,560 Stairs, Elevator, Trasn, Meter rm. 0 18,220 18,220 Balconies & Exterior Corridor 0 75,904 75.904 382,684 34th Level 12 Residential Units, Meter rm. 14,328 100 14,428 Stairs, Elevator, Trash, Meter rm. Balconies & Exterior Corridor 0 911 911 19,698 0 4.359 4,359 35th Level - Spa Deck.- Aerobics, Weight rm., Library, Loung Stairs, Elevator, Trasn, Meter rm. 0 2,722 2,722 0 911 911 Cooling Tower, Storage 61- 835 835 d-eck, 4-un6inq Track 0 13,362 13,362 17,830 � T 0 T A 0 4 VIA. W 001 , 1 -9 W.4 6 0,; 8 WW. ,U895,278 I F-895: 278 I 9 9 - 4307 I Project Summary for Biscayne Bay Tower ivary 28, 1999 PPO.IFCT CRITERIA - PARKING / LOADING A W In PARKI I UM W ", NG' ,WqtWgwn I YK40,0011-M "'.;—VZdNINMC0DE, t W One Bedrooms 1 space x 67 57 spaces TwoBedrooms Three Bedrooms NET TOTAL PARKING - HANDICAPPED ------ 1 space x 231 2 spaces x 60 2% of Total (418) 231 spaces 120 spaces 9 spaces TdTAL'FAFzki Wd-REQUIRED ----427 TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED 525 2-A&RUI E' 2 OMM :-,10421 14REWIRJ-:�3� ;i,•SUR 14 R, U, I- EQ V NE"i PROVIDED, Floor —Level Lobby C6-41 Number of Parking Spaces_Subterranean 36 (82 Standard + 4 HC) 1)5 (104 Standard + I HC) Me,-zz-an-i-ne-Level ------ 121 (119 Standard+ 2 HG) 3rd- L--e,-v-e--1 121 (119 Standard + 2 HC) --,f-f-6--standard spaces required 92 9 handicap spaces required 516 Standard + 9 HC TOTAL 427 total spaces required c-125 totals aces provided LOADPRa N G ffR E*Q"U I'VE WE 0WRWERVU"141REMI& 29 OlDtEwl Project Gross Square Footage 915,046 1 every 100 units = 3 Berths 4 Berths P�,-oli—ct Total Units 358 1 for every 30 units above = 2 Berths 8 loading spaces TOTAL BERTHS 5 Berths 12 total loading spaces 99-,307 Project Summary for Biscayne Bay Tower January 28, 1999 .4r),IFCT CRITERIA - UNIT RREAKDOWN �UNI BREAKDOWN RE�IDQQTL�L N - . 2 - -1 .. . . - W-1 FLOORS - UNITS PER FLR TOTAL - UNIT'N UNMAZ UNIVAT U UNIT'B' I T I UNITT 2' UNITV UNITY 4ifi Level 9 9 0 —0 1 2 1 1 5th Level 9 9 2 2 2 2 —0 —1 -E�- 2 10 x 4'- 0 16 6 LNB.� f : —0 0 2 fith - 13th Level 14-tli 73Srd-Liv-ei 12 x 3 36�— 18: 120 0 6 6 12 x 20 240 40 134th Level 12 12 2 0 1 0 6 0 2 2 IT"O"TArLIC X V V3 8A160 (W.76A/6) 0 WN 9 4 .4 M 7.", A 60 (16.76%) '01376n, 99- 307 1 This instrument was prepared by and should be returned to: Brian P. Tague, Esquire Tew Cardenas Rebak Kellogg Lehman DeMaria & Tague, L.L.P. Suite 2600, Miami Center 201 South Biscayne Boulevard Miami, Florida 33131 (305) 536-1112 Folio No. 01-3219-020-0140 space reserved for recording information WARRANTY DEED THIS INDENTURE, made this 2,% day of January, 1999, by and between MIAMI RESCUE MISSION, INC., a Florida not for profit corporation (the "Grantor"), whose post office address is 2159 N.W. 1st Court, Miami, Florida 33127, in favor of BISCAYNE BAY TOWER, L.L.C., a Florida Iimited liability company (the "Grantee"), whose post office address is 700 West 51 Street, Miami Beach, FL 33140. (Wherever used herein, the terms "Grantor" and "Grantee" include all the parties to this instrument and the heirs, legal representatives and assigns of individuals and the successors and assigns of corporations.) WITNESSETH: That the said Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten and No/100 Dollars ($10.00), and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, hereby grants, bargains, sells, alienates, remises, releases, conveys and confirms unto the Grantee the following described land, situate, lying and being in Miami -Dade County, State of Florida, to wit: Lot 1, in Block 3, of WEST POINT, according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 18, at Page 73, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida; LESS the following portions conveyed to Florida State Road Department by Quit Claim Deed filed in Deed Book 922, at Page 278 described as a strip of land 5 feet in width across the South end of Lot 1 in Block 3 all according to the Plat of WEST POINT Plat Book 18, at Page 73; 99- '307 LESS that portion of Lot 1 in Block 3 of WEST POINT SUBDIVISION, according to the Plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 18, at Page 73, lying Southwest of a curve concave to Northeast, having a radius of 25 feet, the North end of said curve being tangent to the East right-of-way line of Northeast 6th Avenue, and the East end of said curve being tangent to a line 5 feet North of end parallel to the South line of said Lot 1 (the "Property"). THE PROPERTY IS NOT THE HOMESTEAD OF THE GRANTOR NOR DOES ANY MEMBER OF GRANTOR'S FAMILY RESIDE ON THE PROPERTY OR ON ANY PROPERTY CONTIGUOUS TO THE PROPERTY. Subject to taxes and assessments for the year 1999 and all subsequent years; covenants, easements and restrictions of record (but this reference shall not operate to reimpose the same); matters of plat; existing zoning and other governmental regulations. TOGETHER with all the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in any way appertaining. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same in fee simple forever. And the Grantor hereby covenants with the said Grantee that the Grantor is lawfully seized of said land in fee simple, that the Grantor has good right and lawful authority to sell and convey said land, and hereby warrants the title to said land and will defend same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Grantor has hereunto set its hand and seal the day and year first above written. Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of. i Print Name <'RISTTNA 1IJ M_ENOCAL Print ame S f--k Ry- MIAMI RESCUE MISSION, INC., a Florida not for profit corporation ACKNOWLEDGMENT ON FOLLOWING PAGE -2- ekl- 109543 1.DOC 9 9- 30 7-. ems!• i 1 STATE OF FLORIDA ) ) SS: COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE ) Thr, fore o'n Warrant Dg��d was ac owle d beef9re me this Z� dayof January, 1999, b, ��, M J�76Cylo�, w � �/ of Miami Rescue Mission, I., a onda not for profit corporation, on behalf of the corporation, who is personally known to me (y (no) or who has produced as identification. -3- V Notary Public CRISTINA N. MENOCAL Print Name My Commission Expires: OFFICIAL NOTARY SEAL CRISCINA N MEN OCAL NOTARYV UCSTATEOFFLORIDA COMM155ION NO, C rI943 h1Y COMML45ION i XR MAY 1Z,7000 109543_1.DOC 99- 307. This instrument was prepared by and should be returned to: Brian P. Tague, Esquire Tew Cardenas Rebak Kellogg Lehman DeMaria & Tague, L.L.P. Suite 2600, Miami Center 201 South Biscayne Boulevard Miami, Florida 33131 (305) 536-1112 Folio No. 01-3219-020-0150 space reserved for recording information WARRANTY DEED THIS INDENTURE, made this !2/ �_ day of ZA"o 1991, by and between LEONARD M. GATTI, whose post office address is 5809 NiEholson Lane, Unit 1403, N. Bethesda, Maryland 20814; BERNARD F. GATTI, whose post office address is 2401 Pennsylvania Avenue, Unit 9A4, Philadelphia, PA 19130, and ANTHONY J. GATTI, whose post office address is 511 Lamberton Drive, Silver Springs, Maryland 20902 (the "Grantors"), in favor of BISCAYNE BAY TOWER, L.L.C., a Florida limited liability company, (the "Grantee"), whose post office address is 700 West 51st Street, Miami Beach, Florida 33140. (Wherever used herein, the terms "Grantor" and "Grantee" include all the parties to this instrument and the heirs, legal representatives and assigns of individuals and the successors and assigns of corporations.) WITNESSETH: That the said Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten and No/100 Dollars ($10.00), and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, hereby grants, bargains, sells, alienates, remises, releases, conveys and confirms unto the Grantee the following described land, situate, lying and being in Miami -Dade County, State of Florida, to wit: Lots 2, 3, 4 and 5 in Block 3, of WEST POINT, according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 18, at Page 73, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida; LESS the following portions conveyed to Florida State Road Department by Quit Claim Deed filed in Official Records Book 922, at Page 278 described as a strip of land 5 feet in width across the South end of Lots 2, 3 and 4 in Block 3 all according to the Plat of WEST POINT Plat Book 18, at Page 73; and 99- 307 LESS that part of Lot 4, in Block 3, of WEST POINT SUBDIVISION, recorded Plat Book 18, at Page 73, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida, lying Southeast of a curve concave to the Northwest having a radius of 25 feet, the North end of said curve being tangent to the West right-of-way line of N.E. 6`h Avenue, and the West end of said curve being tangent to a line 5 feet North of and parallel to the South line of said Lot 4, (the "Property"). THE PROPERTY IS NOT THE HOMESTEAD OF THE GRANTORS NOR DOES ANY MEMBER OF THEIR FAMILY RESIDE ON THE PROPERTY OR ON ANY PROPERTY CONTIGUOUS TO THE PROPERTY. GRANTORS RESIDES AT THE ADDRESS DESCRIBED ABOVE. Subject to taxes and assessments for the year 1999 and all subsequent years, covenants, easements and restrictions of record, matters of plat, existing zoning and other governmental regulations. The Property is being granted in its "AS IS" condition as of the date of this Warranty Deed. TOGETHER with all the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in any way appertaining. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same in fee simple forever. And the Grantor hereby covenants with the said Grantee that the Grantor is lawfully seized of said land in fee simple, that the Grantor has good right and lawful authority to sell and convey said land, and hereby warrants the title to said land and will defend same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Grantor has hereunto set its hand and seal the day and year first above written. WITNESSES: -a Print Name:, rint Name: (Seal) LEONARD M. GATTI SIGNATURES and ACKNOWLEDGMENTS CONTINUE ON NEXT PAGE -2- 10922778- .00C 307 r n %.- Print Name:1 T I,-r,.zi; lA _fit /N Print Name:. �,,�,�, z ?Z;- "-r- . ,/_;..4.�� Print Name: %,y (., n r� Print Name: DG%G', ri STATE OF 4rid ) SS: COUNTY OF lYlcn ; wmeLt ) (Seal) BERNARD F. GATTI ..�eW ` 2/. � (Seal) ANTHON :GATTI This Warranty Deed was acknowledged before me this jgiv% day of eOu!a , 199q by LEONARD M. GATTI. He is personally known to me or has pr uced I .,nA,,cen, L-Ct4A --sz as identification. Notary Public U Print Name: S'l�e,-ri ��! • C;: �;� 1</ Serial No. (if any): My Commission Expires: ­7' 1 / 6 2. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS CONTINUE ON NEXT PAGE -3- 1491:vocj 0 7 W I a STATE OF SS: COUNTY OF �� } This Warranty Deed was acknowledged before me this 14'7� day of cur 199_% by BERNARD F. GATTI. He is personally known to me or has produ, ed VI Ja'rt.,,ccas identification. Notary Public u Print Name: � �n N- CoAel,' Serial No. (if any): rJ p My Commission Expires: 9ooa t STATE OF T) ) SS: COUNTYOF This Warranty Deed was acknowledged before me this W' day of `J6,1L Lhk , 199 1 by ANTHONY J. GATTI. He is personally known to me or has produced Ma, y Ic.,d Dr;vej s L, ct.vz as :dentifieation, T Notary Public F Print Name: Serial No. (if any): My Commission Expires: -4- ! 09278_1.DOC 9 9 - 307 This instrument was prepared by and should be returned to: Brian P. Tague, !squire Tew C'ardelins Rebate Kellogg Lehman heMaria-&'fugue, L.L.P. Suite 2600, Miami Center 201 South Biscayne 1301.11evut Miami, Florida 33131 (305) 536-1112 Fuliu No. 01.-3219-020-0190 RE'C 18409 F-G 3956 9SR629161- 1998 DEC 29 07:46 DDCSTPDEE 102.00 SURTX 76.50 HARVEY RUVINt CLERK DADE COUNTY► FL This spacer i•esvi-veil for rar..•ortling 0i i-mat'iew WARRAN'('Y 11W.El) t.'IIiS 1NnIsN'CURE, mttcle this clay of December 1998, by and between ROSEMARIE A. FAU, an unnuirried widow (the "Grantor"), whose post office address is 4107 Garlield Street, Hollywood, Florida 33021, in ftvor of BISC:AVNE DAY TOWEAt, I,.L.C., a Florida limited ilability company (tile "Grantee"), whose post office address is 700 West 5lst Street, Miumi Beach, Florida 331.40. (wherever used herein, the terms "Urantur" and "taI'll n(ee" include a1I the parties lu (lris instrument and the heirs, legal Icpresenlative.s nail assigns nl' individuals ►aid the successors alid assigns ul'corpnrotioas.) WiTNESS1:TIf: That till= said Grantor, fur and in consideration of 111e 6t1111 of Ten and N01100 f)ollars ($10.00), and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt whereol' is hereby acknowledged, hereby grants, barguins, sells, alienates, remises, releases, conveys and conlirnls unln the Grantee the following described hued, situate, lying ;ind being in Minini-wade Counly, Slatc of Florida, to wit: Lot 6, in 11lock 3, of WES'.I' POINT, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Bunk 18, at Patio 73, of the Public (records ol'Mianli-Dade Comity, Florida; LFSS the following portion acquired by Order of Taking filed January 25, 1960 in OI•(icial Records Book 1866, at Page 192, described as follows: Lot 6, in Block 3, of WP.ST POINT, us per plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 18, nt Page 73, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Floricla, being more particularly described as follows: Begin at the Northeast corner of said Lot 6; thence Westerly along the Northerly.line of said Lot 6, it distance of 105.00 feet to the Northwest corner of said Lot 6; thence South 82 degrees 29 mi ntmes 58 seconds Last, a distance of 105.79 feet to a point all the Easterly line of said Lot 99-- `07 e r A _" -- REU 18469 PG 3957. 6, thence Northerly alcing (lie said L uslurly line, a distimce of 13.00 reel to the Point of 13eginning (the "Property"). THE PROPERTY IS NOT THE 1101VIES'J"FAD OF THE, GRANTOR NOR DONS ANY MEMBER O'l? HER FAMILY RESIDES ON THE PROPERTY OR ON ANY PROPERTY CONTIGUOUS TO THE PROPERTY'. GRANTOR RESIDES All, TIIU; ADDRESS DESCRIBED ABOVE. Subject 10 taxes and assessment~ rot the year 1999 and ull subsegtient years, covenants, easement~ and restrictions of rocorcl, 111Ltlters of plat, existing zoning and other governmental regulations. The Property is being grunted in its "AS IS" condition as of' Iha dale of this Warranty Deed. TOGli:7'1 ER with all the tenements, hereditaments and uppurienances lheretn belonging or in nny way appertaining. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same in Fee simple forever. _ And the Grantor hereby covenants with the said Grantee that ilia Grantor is lawfully seized of said land in tce simple, that the Grantor has good right and lawlitl authority to sell and convey said land, and hereby warrants the title to said land and will defund same agahist the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. IN WITNESS WHERCOF, the said Grantor has hereunto set its hand and seal the day and year first above written. j Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence ut'. -2- ARIL: A. FAU 109 162 1.DUC 9 9 -- 307 L- z , rt RFF 18409 PG 3958 STATE: OF FLORIDA ,CCU?:J�U IN vl•FR;;"� RFC0,W 800l vc An01 coumrr, F OR/DA "6COND VERIFIED "A�t`�Y RUVIN ) SS: COUNTY Of BROWAR.l) ) 'ma foregoing instrument was acknowledged Whre me this /Z'duy of Uecemher, 1999, by Rosemarie A. hnu, who is personally known to me (yes) (no) or who has produced 25 -L � us identification. #f,e , Norman Getwn -H �t *�tycomm;ssionCcsssa73 Notary Public NoW Expires September 07, 2001 Print Name My Commission Expires: ,. 99- 307 109i 62 1.n0C This instrument was prepared by and should be returned to: Brian P. Tague, Esquire Tew Cardenas Rebak Kellogg Lehman DeMaria & Tague, L.L.P. Suite 2600, Miami Center 201 South Biscayne Boulevard Miami, Florida 33131 (305) 536-1112 Folio No. 01-3219-020-0200 space reserved for recording information WARRANTY DEED THIS INDENTURE, made this _Li� day of 1999, by and between ENRIQUE BLONDET BLOISE (the "Grantor"),Abose ' post office address is 9153 Fontainebleau Boulevard, Apartment No. 4, Miami, Florida 33172, in favor of BISCAYNE BAY TOWER, L.L.C., a Florida limited liability company (the "Grantee"), whose post office address is 700 West 51st Street, Miami Beach, Florida 33140. (Wherever used herein, the terms "Grantor" and "Grantee" include all the parties to this instrument and the heirs, legal representatives and assigns of individuals and the successors and assigns of corporations.) WITNESSETH: That the said Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten and No/100 Dollars ($10.00), and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, hereby grants, bargains, sells, alienates, remises, releases, conveys and confirms unto the Grantee the following described land, situate, lying and being in Miami -Dade County, State of Florida, to wit: Lots 7 and 8, in Block 3, of WEST POINT, according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 18, at Page 73, of the Public Records of Miami - Dade County, Florida (the "Property"). THE PROPERTY IS NOT THE HOMESTEAD OF THE GRANTOR NOR DOES ANY MEMBER OF HIS FAMILY RESIDE ON THE PROPERTY OR ON ANY PROPERTY CONTIGUOUS TO THE PROPERTY. GRANTOR RESIDES AT THE ADDRESS DESCRIBED ABOVE. 99- 307 I L Subject to taxes and assessments for the year 1999 and all subsequent years, covenants, easements and restrictions of record, matters of plat, existing zoning and other governmental regulations. The Property is being granted in its "AS IS" condition as of the date of this Warranty Deed. TOGETHER with all the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in any way appertaining. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same in fee simple forever. And the Grantor hereby covenants with the said Grantee that the Grantor is lawfully seized of said land in fee simple, that the Grantor has good right and lawful authority to sell and convey said land, and hereby warrants the title to said land and will defend same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Grantor has hereunto set its hand and seal the day and year first above written. Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of: Print N � •� ,_ as ENRIQUE BLANDET BLOI E 1, a:�s3,r�[_. • STATE OF FLORIDA ) ) SS: COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this —1y day of 1991, by ENRIQUE BLONDET BLOISE, who is personally known to me Wes) (no) or QFio has produced as identification. 01 NotaryLptu �? OFFICIAL NOTAYWSEAL -A�i��•��• � O�� Mop NO BF-RTPROSILLO Print Name Col PUBLIC Si A7E OF FLO2IDA COMMI55ION NO. CC706675 My Commission Expires: MY C04i!vtissION P. AN. n,2002 -2- 9 9 - 307 109397_I.DOC tit. I �060�G3051 IWrvpr by u'd Ntlmn To ' , lMW hrudnet. T EM1 .17 1294 IM h!'R 1- Tatar Muh ol'1lmt6m I141 WO Uth SUttr.s.&E.1 Ihaluh, ttorida ).tulJ Ui\HRANLYDl:E12 ENSIFDEE 414.0-i SURTX 4t.h0 WAVE( RJVIIL CLEF% DaDE t@UII►Yt FL THIS WARRANTY DEED made and executed this*7.1Z'day of n1 t1`i 1, mis. by WfONIA STEVES, a single person, whose eddress is = t( tt_ (fit. and. IMAR10R1E FHhi and RODERT C. EHh4KE her spouse, whose addrat is C�,uQl tIW i- -a- 'U atk (hereinaller collectively called the "Grantor") to Concepcion Vazquez, and Rosa A. Vazquez, husband and ivifc, whose post oltice address is ''f,,r1 t ty F h"'fa llii t era. 1!,'d'lorida. hereinafter called the Grantee 1VITNESSETH: That the Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars (SI0.00) and other valuable consideration, tit-. receipt and su(lickrKy w!tcrcof is hereby acknowle1ged, by these presents does grant, bargain, sell, alien, remise, release, convey and confirm unto the Granlce, all that certain land situate in Dade County, Florida, viz: Lot 7, Block 2, of WEST POINT, accardilig to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book IS, Page 71 of Ilse Public Records of Dade County, Florida Folio No. 01-3219-020.012U TOGETHER with all the tenements. Imcditanscnts and appurtenances thereto belonging or in eny'.vise appertaining. 'f0 HAVE AND TO HOLD, the same in fee simple forever; SUBJECT, HOWEVER to conditions, reservations, restrictions, limitations and easements of record, applicable zoning erdinances, taxes for the year 1999 and subscqucnt years. I AND the Granter hereby covenants Wth said Grantee that it is Imtiitlly seized ofsaid land in fee simple; that it his good right and lawful authority to sell and convey :aid land: and that said Iil land is nee of all encumbrances except the tnalicrs herein -above mentioned to which ttie deed is I made subject. The Grantor does hereby fully Warrant the title to said land and ail! defend the same lit j against tltc lu vtul claims of all pessons,vhomseevel. I Wherever used herein the terms "Gr-ntur" and "Grantee" include JI the panics to this instrument and the heirs, legal representatives and assigns of individuals, and the successors and it assigns ofcorporations. I{ ,w i I � . p.. •w. U• . I(( li V 9 — 3307 I ►«:1806O► D52 IN WITNESS WHEREOF the Grantor has signed and scaled these presents to be effective the day and year first written above. Signed, Sented and Delivered in the Presence of. titA.r,.. to rwar. atryrssnrtnn: Antonia Sieves ws u oust A •L' k('J�'ddress Marjorie'Ehinke !.(:r\ rat• 1\ rCt A �. Y'J � Address Itob:rt C. Ehmkc Address 1rlA-81t06I 99- a07 C SYSTEMS, INC. - SOUTHEAST 6954 N.W. 12 STREET, MIAMI. FLORIDA 33126 305-477-9149 •800-287-4799 • FAX 305-477-7526 a photocopy 1X;1')U00001W1 FILE No. 709 01i08 '99 17:16 IDJEW CARDENAS REBW LLP Jdtl 0 lr •JJ r.lio/u PAGE 2 WAN I (Invl;:�if�+- 1101mia .A aM Caalq �f-r-�LL- ra the IVIb or PUw41a pn7..• d IM (kw Hw r•d 110040%, JI,- 3.&r.z= a 1304, sow 4 *4 comimm rl--. —Dads - , is dw tll.ie of n rW& Iemi-y " . , of the mimed part VfTW95Mfir 7160 %%w." d r*v7 — at 4ia fl"A pan, for a.d w ndsl3rt.l:,w of es& "M -1 _ dnd AAWm o� _Yalgpb�e...c�AalrSltra-�ha��,. ar' -__. _ ...h f►s�d �.c4 �y lA. �se�,L- �t du ".a.w�i p.rt lM. iwelNl rlwtr.t Y I,.r+br 1.J<a1w a%tv (_. h■ a ...� pw.4 l arwhavai 6" awls aa, Am a..t t party .I ►i., w....d r..a, s W aadvo, (ww.r, d- I nm-alaa .1a.aaiW Im" asa..a.. irl-.. r,A 1riwA 1. dw Is Lobe one (l) IAnd-TMQ (�Ia �lecit TWO (2) -FFT POMP n;cordin Oct thee pplat I,haracef red ard 1.n�Plat MAR 18r At Peas 7, of the E Publip Krdorda o;; i?ade COM41y, Florida, To6ether rri i h illrniture and rurniahWa and erluirmont therein con- tained'AnA l;ated an an inyantory harllto attached and made A part !) hormot, auejeat to rA M94 a 44644 Norimbrr 26r 1%5 nn In the ovirtl nrin- t allpwq1 stlnllriCadf °Thirteen Thousand Pour Hunjr-d and devettby Five � PdillrA (yl3 1#75.On) cno more raraieuiatly boinC FortPre filed 1 of reco u;Aor Clerb a !rile No. p.75516. Sub ass to e"411 tar bhe roar 194' and nharaattert conditlona ores k rea riationA of record 4W Applicable %,uning ordinances. t �Va �. 4.d /iw .aJ,1 P-L-t- alp (lea Pall ds.M Lraal.r (wilt ,.w...l 41a lilt. Ga wwi tun{, seal will 40 ml the 04M aeawerl IM k.twl deface of 111 rariapwa.rrt, LAI 11'iT1 MI irfirwRoF. Ile a.f1 of aw (if" 111W1.7 .. lwrtwwq pit k-A— sud awl..- Lw afoy aid !wr ob"m wr(Iarlw 910" NNW Mi ir?lra.W Is FMMN at h1A1 . �C . 4; %I6 r ru. ,� •r jF fbr.11 Ir r ", &Z4 L51.:QN M/M: L0 U:1b 66/96/ `71.9'7 L92 rm-B11TI N00I1 0MIK 2 99- 307 71 N raX •JVJOOOlOUl JGtI 7ti if - DO r. U(lu( FILE No. 709 01 /09 ' 99 17 :15 I D JEW GARDEWS F�BA4C LLP p 3 l immmY czxTin' *as M iib der a*►ra.i id.N 11✓. M artmor 444,•it t+adltlh.war �tidU a� u!y �riayrirlta•ra41�._ —�.• --�;,... �1+ �1� i�.:,, ,._____—.,,1'•I��'i 1Y rw. MI" `naA la hr Am pulaft _. Lnlhsi to"4Y'i0 "*wool tm We�a6a� 404 "A MAWP4'•L MFp A h.r... ,.. ►1••►..L�.�_...ar�,l thr .r.. ft.rilr *04 volwiWAJ !•r 0- r—.. d q*,W 'To r.ui! ti'11 �YJIT tnJ he "I Ma wasy"l �!;!1011t w1'"-��_�.�.._�_....�rlll SYIa d..� . �. •�� �...�. r1�4.-+A�i.• rf,t.. ((r reraw11�e1Rd 8i}irNt a�aN.• u 1 --..• _ .-._�..._ _._._ . j1'w.rr �k ttlta d fl..�ILt. 6W ON rLOM: (p 22:16 66/BA/ 40 \L ax i 31111 HODTI- OWM 99- 307 This Instrument Prepatt 3y sad ItM= To; Sri= p. Tt►gtitee, FagWm Taw Cardona Robsk Kellogg Lebman DeMeria & Tague, L.L.P. Miand Center, Sufter 2600 201 South Biscayne lRoulavard Mang, Florida 33131 (305) 53&1112 Folio No. 01-32.19-020-0130 "gs V" ►wwrwd for rw*rdtrtg bt/brn Wan WARRANTY DEED THIS MENTUREt too this day of &-sod . 1999 between THE XV An=V ANAL GL INC., a dissolved Florida corporation, (the "Grantor"), wbm post office address Is cto Aw'W J. Duart+e-Viers, Esquire, 3211 Ponce de Leos Boulevard, Suite 202, Coral (Sables, FL 33134, in favor of BISCAYNE MAY TOWER, L.L.C., a Florida lbnitgl llabillty company (the "Grantee"). whose past office addmo is 700 Wort Slat Street, Miami 8ewh, Florida 33I40. (Wherever reseed herein, the terms "Grantor" and "Granted' include all the parties w this instrument and the heirs, Wpi teprewntadvas•and assigns of individuab and the aweeesserrs and assigns of cerporsNons.) WUNNSUM, That said Gmtors, for and in cor ideration of the sum of Ten and No/100 (S 10.00) Dollars, and other good and valuable consideration to said Grantors in hand geld by acid Ormam, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, have granted, bargained and sold to the said Gratrtee, and Grantee's successors and assigns famver, the following described WKi, situate. lying.arA: Ate-Dada-CmLatr, Ppor *-Zs wit Lot S, in Block 21 of WEST POINT, aczording to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 19, at Page 73. of the Public Records of Wtami- Dade County, Florida. TM PROPERTY IS NOT THE HOMESTEAD OF THE GRANTOR NOR DOES ANY Ni MER OF GRANTORS FAMILY RESIDE ON THE PROPERTY OR ON ANY PROPERTY CONTIGUOUS TO TIM PROPERTY. Subject to am and aswasmats for the year 1999 and all rdbmquast years; covenants, caernents and restrictions of record (but this reference shall not operate to reimpose the same): matters of plat; existing zoning rind other gove mental regulations. 2 99- 307 Ir 'i'OGE' EYt %, all the teneaacnta, hereditaments and a; tinances thereto belonging or in any way :t. 0. TO HAVE Alm TO SOLD the same in fix simple fltrever. And the Orantor hereby covemo With the said Grantee that the Grantor is lawfully sWxed of said head is fits simple, that the Grantor has good right and lawful authority to sell and convey said laud, and hereby warraate the tide to said land and will defend same against the lawiisl claims of all persons whamaoevor, IN WnTi S WHMOF, Grantors have hammto act ttzir hands and " the day and year first Above wrltt= Signed, sealed and delivered in the p f: ' t Name: WOW y rPS e— i 4W. STATE OF FLORIDA j ss. COUNTY OF MIA►MI-DADB ) THE BRADLEY IN'.CF,1tNA77ONAL GROUP, INC., dissolved Florida corporation By: ohn Hem Bradley, III, Pros' t The forgoing Warraaty Dyed was acknowledged before me this 1!!V day of 1999, by John Hetlry Bradley, lit, as Presid=vt of l to Bradley Iatern4onal Group, Inc., it dissolved Florida corporation, on bd%Lf of the corporation. H�da perssaallkno wn x or has prvdwd As identification, err Notary Fublic PrintNemc; Commission No.. My Commission Expires: 10a366 IMOC 3 ttotttta, MY OOMMOM M4Wj=%EW11M1 on 99- 307 M Vo- l" . 'Phis instrument was prepared by and should be returned to: Brian P. Vague, Esquire Tew Cardenas R.ebak Kellogg Lehman DeMaria & Tague, L.L.P. Suite 2600, Miami Center 201 South Biscayne Boulevard Miami, Florida 33131 (305) 536-1112 Polio No. 01-3219-020.0100 space reserved for recording information WARRANTY DEED THIS INDENTURE, made this ,�� day of 1999, by and between IRENE K..RUBIN (the "Grantor"), whose post office address is 11111 Biscayne Boulevani, Unit 1651, Miami, Florida 33181, in favor of BISCAYNE DAY TOWER, L.L.C., a Florida limited liability company (the "Grantee"), whose post office address is 700 West 51 Street, Miami Beach, FL 33140. (Wherever used herein. the terms "Granter" and "Grantee" include all the partles to this instrument and the heirs, legal representatives and assigns of individuals and the successors and assigns of corpurations.) WITNESSETH: That the said Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten and No/100 Dollars ($10.00), and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, hereby grants, bargains, sells, alienates, remises, releases, conveys and confirms unto the Grantee the following described land, situate, lying and being In Miami -Dade County, State of Florida, to wit: Lot 5, In Block 2, of WEST POINT, according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 18, at Page 73, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida (the "Property"). THE PROPERTY IS NOT THE HOMESTEAD OF THE GRANTOR NOR DOES ANY MEMBER OF GRANTOR'S FAMILY RESIDE ON THE PROPERTY OR ON ANY PROPERTY CONTIGUOUS TO THE PROPERTY. Subject to taxes and assessinents for the year 1999 and all subsequent years, covenants, casements and restrictions of record (but this reference shall not operatc to reimpose the same); matters of plat; existing toning and other governmental regulations. 99— i a307 t,,. s TOGETHER with all the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in any way Appertaining, TO HAVE AND ,ro HOLD the same in :fee simple forever. S And the Grantor hereby covenants with the said Grantee that the Grantor is lawfully seized of said land in tee simple, that the Grantor has good right and lawful authority to sell and convey said land, and hereby warranty the title to said land and will defend same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. IN WiTNLSS WHEREOF, the said Grantor has hereunto set its Band slid seal the day and year first above written. Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence or I K. RUHZN STATE OF FLORIDA ) ) SS: COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE ) The foregoing BILL OF SALE was acknowledged before me this .L day of 1999, by Irene K. Rubin, who is personally known to me (yes) (no) or who has roduced as identification. •z- iR!�Tt] eRY P0. OFFICIAL DA TAAY BEAL Print Na a `OOMM1881ON NIJI�ACL'OMM1881Qk NIJI� OM OC404413 III COMMI8bi0N EXP. My co 99- '3o7 This instrument was prepared by and should be returned to: Brian P. Tague, Esquire Tew Cardenas Rebak Kellogg Lehman DeMaria & Tague, L.L.P. Suite 2600, Miami Center 201 South Biscayne Boulevard Miami, Florida 33131 (305) 536-1112 Folio No. 01-3219-020-0080 I I is space reserved for recording information THIS INDENTURE, made this day of 3anwapt. 1999. by and between BENJAMIN PIERRE (the "Grantor"), whose post office address is 915 N.W. 1st Avenue, Apartment # H-3003, Miami, Florida 33136, in favor of BISCAYNE BAY TOWER, L.L.C., a Florida limited liability company (the "Grantee"), whose post office address is 700 West 51 Street, Miami Beach, FL 33140. (Wherever used herein, the terms "Grantor" and "Grantee" include all the parties to this instrument and the heirs, legal representatives and assigns of individuals and the successors and assigns of corporations.) WITNESSETH: That the said Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten and No/100 Dollars ($10.00), and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, hereby grants, bargains, sells, alienates, remises, releases, conveys and confirms unto the Grantee the following described land, situate, lying and being in Miami -Dade County, State of Florida, to wit: Lots 3 and 4, in Block 2, of WEST POINT, according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 18, at Page 73, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida; LESS the following portion conveyed to Florida State Road Department by Quit Claim Deed filed in Official Records Book 922, at Page 278 described as a strip of land 5 feet in width across the South end of Lots 3 and 4 in Block 2 all according to the Plat of WEST POINT Plat Book 18, at Page 73; LESS that part Lot 4 in Block 2 all according to the Plat of WEST POINT Plat Book 18, at Page 73 of the Public records of Miami -Dade County, Florida, lying. Southeast of a curve concave to the Northwest, having a radius of 25 feet, the 9 9 - 0'7 North end of said curve being tangent to the West right of way line of N.E. 6th Avenue, and the West end of said curve being tangent to a line 5 feet North of and parallel to the South line of said Lot 4 (the "Property"). THE PROPERTY IS NOT THE HOMESTEAD OF THE GRANTOR NOR DOES ANY MEMBER OF HIS FAMILY RESIDE ON THE PROPERTY OR ON ANY _ PROPERTY CONTIGUOUS TO THE PROPERTY. Subject to taxes and assessments for the year 1999 and all subsequent years; covenants, easements and restrictions of record (but this reference shall not operate to reimpose the same); matters of plat; existing zoning and other governmental regulations. TOGETHER with all the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in any way appertaining. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same in fee simple forever. And the Grantor hereby covenants with the said Grantee that the Grantor is lawfully seized of said land in fee simple, that the Grantor has good right and lawful authority to sell and convey said land, and hereby warrants the title to said land and will defend same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Grantor has hereunto set its hand and seal the day and year first above written. Signed, sealed and delivered Z e C-P V BENJAMIN PiERRE ACKNOWLEDGMENT ON FOLLOWING PAGE -2- 14' 109465_I.DOC 0 9 - 307 r- I W E STATE OF FLORIDA ) ) SS: COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE ) The foregoing Warranty Deed was acknowledged before me this day of ;aau 1999, by Benjamin Pierre, who is personally known to me (yes) o) or who has produced 1 V r i PXJS (I c t S� as identification. -3- F V� W�►'[WAL NOTARY SEAL Print N �i� CARIDAD SANTIS e COMMISSION NUMBER y C504413 M Co i rrMMlss►oN Exa, G� 0 109465_ I.DOs�C 99- 30'7 e t FC 017 SYSTEMS, INC. - SOUTHEAST 6954 N.W. 12 STREET, MIAMI, FLORIDA 33126 305-477-9149 - 800-287-4799 - FAX 305-477-7526 i -- - - - - - a- aw III condition 1, I A -lute a1W►. Amn, County Cain, . d�!!! ...__-.__-,;ounip ;ff i 8 I2 n Gi1G mil. �•oc��." ■wM WIIUS %CM y¢ngm on "w u.Mr Oml d...:! ��w--. _. -__ _._Cw�hr• Vtbt . M erM M eleM• eW....1 M.tNrt.l-• _ - _.._._........ill�lb C!u9aba.. ... _...... _....».._- _._._. _......_.. Y 04 w ef. MW eeeeM l.eoobd.e iawMd .n1 pOtRI&p wm "pwn•Yrw.�•w�.�'7 Mb111.t el..�a.A s.►A.b •+d•eeleeA �...___-•---�""� +� poeeeA M..i1 wdwt (Mow •inMi1'w •�L•r..l'I rd NrnW eM ..:wA• e. a.3 pri{.� M Ada . eawnA M M M..! eN.' .wawa / r1 M�dnd M M de.. b �•• V w.� ee.n.�eA. ed Nw+MA.w�w eutM�nee d.�.# ►..►.wee ow sw.�.Aet..1 ��.. do rde"W"ll r.. - ,- _-wilile� 7. SS�CAey -� ae W& t+MJir. we I ewlMwlad y wjw ee cm mtw. *ma dw Z,{,tb........... /eY d- rd.mma— —. h1� eaaatw. oahAle..A i•Mry k li�RlOt A._Cat noa�eed_Ut!_ C"T&W .... __ - m W s.4u.lwts� NO�If, TFpC>1KIvnIC• t, e6..�i._....._,...�3...�i!lFl�......._-_.., b •+f•h�r .1 u. Qeoee Novo ad "A h aw oyoew N Owk roiie. i. %"MO N d *A plel e.d.li�+!?4��►1KIl� . iv d �� 0o ti'`. r.r M bed NSA b do va de bff*W eau•e Ind �..y ure ilt rl/ 1f Ids SJAOORM• �!iSSeltll e, - - 01 rrw�e�,�w�1+�4�.f�Jllad[..�.][�M�..tgi�►t,..rcr�+s�Atas�a..i+ut..easu,di s�oor8.e Sae ?SUE }golf },Ce„3!�fa 7� oR EIe� lveLl�es R}��e►1,pr8U.&G!W/�S!.. lleslia�W�at�lN�laa+e� Ue �`2i ��t�e �'�1�� r�slAit..�94�►�x M!!3^I cere�al�,�[erse�t °4---- a E1.p�L=j#4� sM�A i a r nw, -- I ....u•.. •. ......... ....... ...... .._ .. ._.... ....... ----^ tld..' -.. ho ma . �r•'A A 1W M� MA YMe• e.nMERK� j� Y 9 9 -- 307 -vw Wrr?4ES1 OW bow*" Ir (if ty Cbs on N. W&4.1 Tint 'y iTATS OF W13cGmtK DL cootty. P.6.a cwA bd" pw lk1or, 2 tip ......... wam 0- sp ftwi■ Zfk$Pf' t1brsftvd br Marlon X. Qft%4t X(�. Vb %b I fA. To8T998sO2:xvj TO/Told 821. -jw I 09- 6 C07 t M r ti %.- CONSUELO M. QUINTANA REAL ESTATE DATA RESEARCHER 1111 SW filth Avenue, Miami, FL 33129-1820 OFC # 305-858-2287 PAX # 305-859-2439 JANUARY 01, 1999 CITY OF MIAMI PLANNING & ZONING BOARD ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT P.O. BOX 330708 MIAMI, FL 33133 RE: PROPERTY OWNERSHIP LIST WITHIN 3751 FT FROM: N.E. 36TH STREET AND N.E. 5TH AVENUE MIAMI, FL 33137 (STREET ADDRESS) (SEE MAP ATTACHED) (LEGAL DESCRIPTION) DADE COUNTY FLORIDA. THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE ATTACHED OWNERSHIP LIST, MAP AND MAILING MATRIX IS A COMPLETE AND ACCURATE REPRESENTATION OF THE REAL ESTATE PROPERTY AND PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 375, FEET OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY LISTED ABOVE. THIS REFLECTS THE MOST CURRENT RECORDS ON FILE IN THE DADE COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S OFFICE. (MIA-2104)(L-499) (26 LABELS) 9 9 - 307 (L-499L)(26 LABELS) (ORI TALLY 29 NAMES) MTER CLUB CONDO ALL DIVERSIFIED —oNDO ASSOC FINANCIAL SEV INC 600 HE 36TH ST 3918 NW 167TH ST MIAMI FL 33137 OPA LOCKA FL 33054 GEORGE SAMBOR RAYMOND KNOWLES 438 NE 35TH TERR 3924 NW 167 ST MIAMI FL 33137 OPA LOCKA FL 33054 LEONARD HABER JOYANRO CORP 777 ARTHUR GODFREY RD 2FL 12726 SW 95TH CT MIAMI BCH FL 33139 MIAMI FL 33176 SETE LORING FELSON 414 NE 36 ST MIAMI FL 33137 RAFAEL LAUREANO/MA >47 NE 35TH TERR aMI FL 33137 GEORGE I SAMBOR 434-36 NE 35 TERR MIAMI FL 33137 BAY TERRACE APTS INC/CR 1311 97TH ST BAY HARBOR ISL FL 33154 LAX COSMO 1311 97TH ST BAY HARBOR ISL FL 33154 WALTER M STRINE % NEAL R KALIS & ASSOC 7320 GRIFFIN RD #109 j S FL 33314 MARINA & CO/CR 7425 NW 79 ST MIAMI FL 33166 KIMBAR CORP PO BOX 560481 MIAMI FL 33256 POINT BAY NORTH CONDO CONDO ASSOC 520 NE 38TH ST MIAMI FL 33137 REINALDO EXPOSITO DAVID CAMPO 454 NE 38 ST MIAMI FL 33137 MILTON STANLEY 448 NE 38 ST MIAMI FL 33137 ANDRE E KHAWLY 430 NE 38 ST #1 MIAMI FL 33137 RUTH E OSSER 428 NE 38 ST MIAMI FL 33137 JOSE LUIS URREA 445 NE 36 ST MIAMI FL 33137 1 MAX ALEXANDER MORELLI 455 NE 36 ST MIAMI FL 33137 JOHN MACLAREN 4811 BILTMORE DR CORAL GABLES FL 33146 SHELL OIL CO/CR 100 S PINE ISLAND RD PLANTATION FL 33324 LEONCIO GRANDA 460 NE 59TH ST MIAMI FL 33137 APARTMENTS ARM 1743 NW 16 TERR MIAMI FL 33125 CITY OF MIA P & D DIV ASSETS MGT 444 SW 2ND AVE #325 MIA FL 33130 99- 307 lk.- 6 ST CAU! 99- 307 t.- -- P 3(� x BAYFRONT SUB, PB 102-75 TRACT A (L-499) (29 LABELS) TR A 600 NE 36TH ST 01-3230-046 JOHN COLLINS SUB, PB 1-53 LOT 1 438 HE 35TH TERR 01-3230-004-0020 LOT 2 e B121/2 FT OF IT 3 LESS R/W VACANT 01-3230-004-0030 LOT 3 LESS E121/2 FT & LESS R/W 414 HE 36TH ST 01-3230-004-0040 B40FT OF E70FT OF LOT 4 347 NE 35TH TERR 01-3230-004-0050 JEFREY & ROBBINS SIIB, PB_ 3-10 LOT 1 434-36 HE 35TH TERR' 01-3230-005-0010 LOT 2 400 HE 35TH TERR 01-3230-005-0020 LOT 3 412 HE 35TH TERR 01-3230-005-0021 LOTS 4-5 410 NE 35TH TERR 01-3230-005-0030 BUM'M VISTA BISC BADGER OM COS PB_1-115 LOTS 1 & 3 499 NE 37TH ST 01-3219-0010 1 CHARTER CLUB CONDO CONDO ASSOC 600 NE 36TH ST MIAMI FL 33137 GEORGE SAMBOR 438 NE 35TH TERR MIAMI FL 33137 LEONARD HABER 777 ARTHVR GODFREY RD 2FL MIAMI BCH FL 33139 SETH LORING FELSON 414 HE 36 ST MIAMI FL 33137 RAFAEL LAUREANO/MA 347 NE 35TH TERR MIAMI FL 33137 GEORGE I SAMBOR 434-36 NE 35 TERR MIAMI FL 33137 BAY TERRACE APTS INC/CR 1311 97TH ST BAY HARBOR ISLAND FL 33154 LAI COSMO 1311 97TH ST BAY HARBOR ISLAND FL 33154 LAI COSMO 1311 97TH ST BAY HARBOR ISLAND FL 33154 WALTER M STRIKE % REAL R KALIS & ASSOC 7320 GRIFFIN RD #109 DAVIS FL 33314 99- '30'7 ,tY 2 LOT 5 MARINA & CO/CR 491 NE 37TH ST 7425 NW 79 ST 01-3219-019-0040 MIAMI FL 33166 LOT 7 ALL DIVERSIFIED FINANCIAL 481 HE 37TE ST SEV INC 01-3219-019-0060 3918 NW 167TH ST OPA LOCKA FL 33054 LOT 9 ALL DIVERSIFIED FINANCIAL 471 NE 37TH ST SEV INC 01-3219-019-0080 3918 NW 167TH ST OPA LOCKA FL 33054 ALL LOTS 11 & 13 & ElFT OF LT 15 RAYMOND KNOWLES 457 NE 37TH ST 3924 NW 167 ST 01-3219-019-0100 OPA LOCKA FL 33054 LOT 15 LESS E1FT THEREOF JOYANRO CORP 441 NE 37TH ST 12726 SW 95TH CT 01-3219-0120 MIAMI FL 33176 LOT 17 LESS PORTION LYG IN R/W KIMBAR CORP 433 NE 37TH ST PO BOX 560481 01-3219-0150 MI MI FL 33256 KAMTOLIA PARK 2ND AMD PB 5-25 LOT 22 LESS R/W POINT BAY NORTH CONDO 520 NE 38TH ST CONDO ASSOC D1-3219-036 520 NE 38TH ST MIAMI FL 33137 LOT 23 LESS R/W REINALDO EXPOSITO 454 NE 38TH ST DAVID CAMPO D1-32190 011-0240 454 NE 38 ST MIAMI FL 33137 LOT 24 LESS R/W MILTON STANLEY 148 NE 38TH ST 448 NE 38 ST D1-3219-011-0250 MIAMI FL 33137 :OT 25 ANDRE E 103AWLY 130 NE 38TH ST 430 NE 38 ST #1 )1-3219-011-0260 MIAMI FL 33137 99- 307 LOT 26 LESS R/W 428 NE 38TH ST 01-3219-011-0270 WEST POINT PB 18-73 BLOCK 1 LOT 1 & E16.5FT OF S3.66FT OF 1050FT OF LOT 3 445 NE 36TH ST 01-3219-020-0010 LOT 2 LOESS R/W 455 HE 36TH ST 01-3219-020-0020 LOT 3 LESS E16.5FT OF S3.66FT OF W50FT 3618 HE 5TU AVE 01-3219-020-0030 3 RUT H R OSSER 428 NE 38 ST MIAMI FL 33137 JOSE LUIS URREA 445 HE 36 ST MIAMI FL 33137 MAX ALEXANDER MORELLI 455 NS 36 ST MIAMI FL 33137 JOHN MACLAREN 4811 BILTMORE DR CORAL GABLES FL 33146 LOT 4 JOHN MACLAREN 3630 NE 5TH AVR 4811 BILTMORE DR 01-3219-020-0040 CORAL GABLES FL 33146 ACREAGE & UNRECORDED PLATS BEG 86OFTE & 30FTH OF SW COR OF SEC CONT SHELL OIL CO/CR N183.67FT W183.41FT S 7 DEG W 180.06FT S 41 DEG 100 S PINE ISLAND RD E6.65FT E201.36FT TO POE PLANTATION FL 33324 3601 BISCAYNE BLVD 01-3219-000-0060 BEG 30FTH & 91OFTE OF SW COR OF SW1/4 FOR POE TH LEONCIO GRANDA E97.92FT N50 DEG 41 MIN 38 SEC E54.74FT N80FT N48 460 HE 59TH ST DEG 54 MIN 58 SEC W105.41FT W60FT & S183.66FT TO MIAMI FL 33137 POE F01-3219-000-0090 409 NE 36TH ST SANDRICOURT PR 3-83 APARTMENTS AM E77FT OF W225.50FT OF BK 1 E OF IT 11 LESS N10FT 1743 NW 16 TERR 421 NE 35TH ST MIAMI FL 33125 01-3230-003-0060 PARK #132 STEARNS PARK CITY OF MIA P & D S OF NE 38TH ST & 6TH AVE DIV ASSETS MGT GOVT LAM 444 SW 2ND AVE #325 MIA FL 33130 99 - 4307 A., 4- M �IVacaarrnor�nbrin�sdnts"rl'n�sdr�bac�br�c�tirac�ccrc MEN of te ,�INS t aL - lba v �!� � 3Hrpttrtment of Rtutp I certify the attached is a true and correct copy of the Articles of Organization of BISCAYNE BAY TOWER, LLC., a limited liability company organized under the laws of the state of Florida, filed on November 30, 1998, as shown by the records of this office. I futher certify the document was electronically received under FAX audit number 898000022242. This certificate is issued in accordance with section 15.16, Florida Statutes, and authenticated by the code noted below The document number of this limited liability company is L9B000002909. Given under my hand and the Great Seal of the State of Florida, at Tallahassee, the Capital, this the First day of December, 1998 Authentication Code: 29BA00056731-113098-L98000002909-1/1 ME= (1-95) a� • �7L713 �ttnD�rtt �. �.artE�tmt ,$pertf=q of Mite - 9 9 - 'U .f FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF STATE Sandra B. Mortham Secretary of State s December 1, 1998 BISCAYNE BAY TOWER, LLC, 700 51ST STREET MIAMI, FL 33140 The Articles of Organization for BISCAYNE BAY TOWER, LLC, were filed on November 30, 1998, and assigned document number L98000002909. Please refer to this number whenever corresponding with this office. The certification you requested is enclosed. To be official, the certification for a certified copy must be attached to the original document number that was electronically submitted and filed under FAX udit number H98000022242. X limited liability annual report will be due this office between January and May 1 of the year following the calendar year of the file date. A Federal Employer Identification (FEI) number will be required before this report can be filed. Please apply NOW with the Internal Revenue Service by calling 1-800-829-3676 and requesting form SS-4. Please be aware if the limited liability company address changes, it is the responsibility of the limited liability to notify this office. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please telephone (850) 487-6051, the Registration Section. Diane Cushing 'Corporate Specialist Division of Corporations Letter Number: 29BA00056731 Division of Corporations - P.O. BOX 6327 - Tallahassee, Florida 32314 WN 99- 307 !I %I- DIRECI ORY OF PROJECT PRINCIPALS AND TEAM FOR BISCAYNE BAY TOWER Applicant/Owner: Biscayne Bay Tower, LLC 700 West 51st Street Miami Beach, Florida 33140 Telephone: (305) 864-8022 Contact: Felipe Paraud Developer/Investor: First Capital Trust, LLC 700 West 515` Street Miami Beach, Florida 33140 Telephone: (305) 866-4449 Contact: William Pryor Architect: The Sieger Architectural Partnership 2300 S.W. 84th Avenue Miami, Florida 33176 Telephone: (305) 274-2702 Facsimile: (305) 274-2887 Contact: Charles Sieger Landscape EGS2 Corporation Architect: 9300 S.W. 87th Avenue Miami, Florida 33176 Telephone: (305) 274-2702 Facsimile: (305) 274-2887 Contact: William Eager Traffic: Transport Anaylsis Professionals 8701 S.W. 1371h Avenue, Suite 210 Miami, Florida 33183 Telephone: (305) 385-0777 Facsimile: (305) 385-9997 Contact: Richard Eichinger Civil/Surveyor: Fortin, Leavy, Skiles Inc. 180 N.E. 168th Street North Miami Beach, FI 33162 Telephone: (305) 653-4493 Facsimile: (305) 651-7152 Contact: Dan Fortin and Carl Skiles Economist: Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. 1 S.E. Third Avenue, Suite 2100 Miami, Florida 33131 Telephone: (305) 374-1574 Facsimile: (305) 372-8161 Contact: Darryl Sharpton and Tom Scholsser Attorneys: Greenberg Traurig, P.A. 1221 Brickell Avenue Miami, Florida 33131 Telephone: (305) 579-0603 and (305) 579-0683 Facsimile: (305) 579-0717 Contact: Lucia A.Dougherty, Esq. and Adrienne Friesner Pardo, Esq. MIAM MARDOA/1005798/Ik2s01 I. DOG7 /13/99 9 9 - 6307 ❑.PROJECT DESCRIPTION Ic 1 BISCAYNE BAY TOWER MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT PROJECT DESCRIPTION ARTICLE II. Project Description A. Zoning Ordinance No. 11000 1. Section 1304.2.1 2. Section 1702.2.1 3. Section 1702.2.2 4. Section 1702.2.3 %I- Application forms; supplementary materials General Report Major Use Special Permit Concept Plan Development Impact Study 99- 3,97 I BISCAYNE BAY TOWER MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT 1. Section 1304.1.1 Application forms; supplementary materials (a) Statements of ownership and control of the proposed development of activity. The Disclosure of Ownership and Ownership Affidavit are provided in Article I. (b) Statement describing in detail the character and intended use of the development or activity. Biscayne Bay Tower will by a 34 story residential building with 358 units. The project is located at Northeast 36th Street and Northeast 61h Avenue in the City of Miami, Florida. The development consists of a parcel with a net lot area of 87,672 square feet (2.013 acres). The gross lot area is 185,534 square feet (4.25 acres). The property fronts Northeast 361h Street on the south, Northeast 51h Avenue on the west, 1-95 on the north and Martell Park on the east. The zoning designations for the property are R-4 and SD-20. The proposed building will contain 358 residential units (67 one (1) bedroom, 231 two (2) bedroom, and 60 three (3) bedroom units. Each unit will have direct elevator access with six (6) tenant elevators and one service elevator on each floor. The roof will contain active amenities such as a running track, aerobics room, lounge & library, weight room and spa. The top of the parking garage will contain a spa area, tennis court, shade structures and pool. The center of the building will contain a six (6) story hole in order to provide an openness to the building's appearance. The project includes an enclosed five (5) story parking structure with 525 parking spaces. The main entrance to the project is through a beautifully landscaped porte-cochere off Northeast 361h Street. Primary service will occur off Northeast. 51h Avenue. There will be a secondary service access for mechanical rooms along the eastern boundary of the property. 9 9 - 307 r i s �'r - - - ,#, N Entrance to the parking garage will be from Northeast 36Ih Street. Building residents and guests will be able to chose between valet parking or self parking. The ground floor will contain the lobby, function room, electrical vault, electrical room, pump room, generator room, and parking. The mezzanine floor will contain storage and parking, the 3d floor will house a daycare, business center, leasing office and parking. The 4`h floor will contain storage, residential units, parking, spa and planters. The 5th level will have residential units, pool deck, tennis court, water feature and planters. The 6th through 34`h levels will have all residential units. Drawings showing the architectural character and location of the intended uses are included under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (c) General location map, showing relation of the site or activity for which special permit is sought to major streets, schools, existing utilities, shopping areas, important physical features in and adjoining the project or activity and the like. The following exhibits are included with the Major Use Special Permit Application: (1) Aerial: Aerial photograph of the surrounding area indicating the project site. (2) Area Context Map/Site Aerial: Map of the project area indicating buildings and their functions that surround the site. (3) Location Map: Map of the surrounding street system indicating the project location. (d) A site plan containing the title of the project and the names of the project planner and developer, date, and north arrow and, based on an exact survey of the property drawn to a scale of sufficient size to show: The general information requested is shown on the Ground/Site Plan, Sheet 1, provided under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. The site plan includes the following: 2 99- 307 s ,� (1) Boundaries of the project, any existing streets, buildings, watercourses, easements and section lines; The boundaries of the project and the location of existing streets and easements are shown on the Survey located under Tab 5 of the Supporting Documents. (2) Exact location of all buildings and structures; The exact location of all existing buildings located on the property is shown on the Boundary Survey under Tab 5. The location of the building to be constructed is shown on the Site Plan, Sheet 1, located under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (3) Access and traffic flow and how vehicular traffic will be separated from pedestrian and other types of traffic; Vehicular access for the project is from Northeast 36tn Street. Access to the parking garage for self and valet parking is located at the lobby. The service drive for the project, as well as the loading areas are located on the west side of the property. A detailed analysis of the site access and traffic flow is provided in the Traffic Impact Analysis located under Tab 2 of the Supporting Documents. (4) Offstreet parking and offstreet loading areas; The offstreet parking facility will be located'/2 level below the building and 4 1/2 levels above ground. The parking structure will contain 5 levels of parking with 525 parking spaces. The garage is shown on Sheets 2-6, provided under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. The Zoning Ordinance requires five (5) loading bays. There will be four (4) loading bays 12 ft. x 55 ft. and eight (8) berths 10 feet x 20 feet. The clearance for all loading bays is 15 feet. Service areas are shown on the Subterranean Plan, Sheet 2, under Tab 6 of the a Supporting Documents. 3 �f 9 9 - 307 N L (5) Recreational facilities locations; The garage roof and the roof of the building, will serve as recreation decks for the development and will include indoor and outdoor amenities. The garage roof will include a tennis court, pool and decking, spa and water feature. The building roof will include indoor recreational facilities such as lounge and library, spa, lockers, bathrooms and showers. Exterior facilities will include a running track and roof deck with planters. These facilities are shown on the Pool Deck Level 5 and on the Level 35-Spa Deck Floor Plan, Sheets 6, 7 and 13 located under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (6) Screens and buffers; Adjacent to 1-95 trees will be planted. Landscaped areas are indicated on the Lobby Level Planting Plan, Sheet L- 1, located under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (7) Refuse collections areas; Waste collection will be provided by a containerized compactor system located within the service area. In addition, the project will have a high rise recycling system. The building will include a dry wash, refrigerated garbage rooms and can wash. These facilities are shown on the Subterranean Plan, Sheet 2, located under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (8) Access to utilities and points of utilities hookups. Access and connections to site utilities are discussed in the Site Utility Study located under Tab 3 of the Supporting Documents. (e) Tabulations of total gross acreage in the project and the percentages thereof proposed to be devoted to: (1) The various permitted uses: Residential Sq. Ft. = 425,181 S.F. 4 99 - 307 MW (2) Ground coverage by structures: Building Footprint = 59,723 S.F. Ground coverage by the structures is 32% of the total gross lot area. (f) Tabulation showing the following: (1) The derivation of numbers of offstreet parking and offstreet loading spaces shown in (d) above; The total number of offstreet parking spaces required is 427 spaces and the total number of spaces provided is 525 spaces. Derivation of the number of offstreet parking is shown under Project Criteria - Parking/Loading, within the Project Summary, located under Tab 6. (2) Total project density in dwelling units per acre. Total project density is 178 units per acre. (g) If common facilities (such as recreation areas of structures, private streets, common open space, etc.) are to be provided for the development, statements as to how such common facilities are to be provided and permanently maintained. All common facilities provided will be maintained by the Owner. (h) Storm drainage and sanitary sewerage plans. Storm drainage, water distribution, waste water and solid waste generation provisions are discussed in the Site Utility Study located under Tab 3 of the Supporting Documents. (i) Architectural definitions for buildings in the development; exact number of dwelling units, sizes, and types, together with typical floor plans of each type. Detailed information and breakdown of square footage of all uses are found under Project Criteria within The Project Summary, included under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. Typical floor plans for residential units are shown on the Typical Residential Floor Plans, included in Sheet 6 through 12. All drawings are located under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. s 99- 30'7 C 0- (2) Ground coverage by structures: Building Footprint = 59,723 S.F. Ground coverage by the structures is 32% of the total gross lot area. (f) Tabulation showing the following: (1) The derivation of numbers of offstreet parking and offstreet loading spaces shown in (d) above; The total number of offstreet parking spaces required is 427 spaces and the total number of spaces provided is 525 spaces. Derivation of the number of offstreet parking is shown under Project Criteria - Parking/Loading, within the Project Summary, located under Tab 6. (2) Total project density in dwelling units per acre. Total project density is 178 units per acre. (g) If common facilities (such as recreation areas of structures, private streets, common open space, etc.) are to be provided for the development, statements as to how such common facilities are to be provided and permanently maintained. All common facilities provided will be maintained by the Owner. (h) Storm drainage and sanitary sewerage plans. Storm drainage, water distribution, waste water and solid waste generation provisions are discussed in the Site Utility Study located under Tab 3 of the Supporting Documents. (i) Architectural definitions for buildings in the development; exact number of dwelling units, sizes, and types, together with typical floor plans of each type. Detailed information and breakdown of square footage of all uses are found under Project Criteria within The Project Summary, included under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. Typical floor plans for residential units are shown on the Typical Residential Floor Plans, included in Sheet 6 through 12. All drawings are located under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. s 99- 30'7 C 0- r'- 0 r, (�) Plans for signs, if any. The project will obtain signage approval at a later date. (k) Landscaping plan, including types, sizes and locations of vegetation and decorative shrubbery, and showing provisions for irrigation and future maintenance. The landscape plans showing vegetation are found on the Lobby Level Planting (ground floor) Plan, Sheet L-1, (the Parking Level 4 and Level 5 Planting Plan & Recreation Deck), Sheets L-2 and L-3. All landscape plans are located under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (I) Plans for recreation facilities, if any, including location and general description of buildings for such use. The 4"' Level Roof Area will contain a spa and recreation deck. The 5ch Level Roof Area will contain a pool, tennis court and recreation deck. The 35'h Level, will include a fitness center, spa, steam and sauna rooms, Jacuzzi with access to the sun decks. (m) Such additional data, maps, plans, or statements as may be required for the particular use or activity involved. The details of the spaces and calculations used to compute the Floor Area Ratio (FAR) are shown on the Site Plan, Sheet 1, provided under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (n) Such additional data as the applicant may believe is pertinent to the proper consideration of the site and development plan. Elevations depicting the architectural character of the building are shown on the Buildings Elevations, Sheets 19, 20 , 21 and 22. All elevations are located under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. 2. Section 1702.2.1 General Report. (1) Property ownership and beneficial interest within the boundaries of the area proposed for Major Use Special Permit. G 99- 30'7 a Ik.. Statement of Ownership and beneficial interest within the boundaries of the area proposed for Major Use Special Permit are provided in Article I. (2) 'The nature of the unified interest or control. The nature of unified interest or control is indicated in Article I. (3) Survey of the proposed area showing property lines and ownership. A copy of the Surveys are included under Tab 5 of the Supporting Documents. (4) Map of existing features, including streets, alleys, easements, utilities lines, existing land use, general topography, and physical features. The existing site features and utility lines are shown on the Boundary Survey of the property located under Tab 5. The site features and the utilities are also described in the Site Utility Study, located under Tab 3 of the Supporting Documents. (5) Materials to demonstrate the relationship of the elements listed in (4) preceding to surrounding area characteristics. The drawings submitted with this Application are located under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (6) Existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan designa- tions for the area on and around the lands proposed for Major Use Special Permit. The existing zoning designation for the property pursuant to City of Miami Ordinance No. 11000 and Page 15 of the Zoning Atlas Map (which is located in Article 1), indicates the existing and surrounding zoning. The zoning designations for the property are R-4 and SD-20. The Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use designation for the property is Residential High Density. The zoning and the comprehensive plan designations are consistent with one another. 99-- 30'7 t 3. Section 1702.2.2 Major Use Special Permit Concept Plan. a. Relationships of the concept plan to surrounding existing and proposed future uses, activities, systems, and facilities (transportation, recreation, view corridors, pedestrian systems, service systems and similar uses. Article II contains a written narrative of this project outlining proposed uses, activities and architectural character. This narrative also contains descriptions of the project's relationship to traffic, pedestrian movements, and transportation access. Building elevations, sections and perspectives showing the proposed materials, vertical profile and height, and orientation to streets are included in the drawings submitted with this Application. The list of drawings submitted is found under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. b. Existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan principles and designations. The project conforms with the R-4 and SD-20 zoning district designations for the property. The comprehensive plan future land use designation conforms with the land use designation currently in effect for the property. 4. Section 1702.2.3 Developmental Impact Study. (a) A traffic analysis shall be submitted for an area within approximately 1/4 mile of the site, or an area including the major intersections to be impacted by the site, whichever is larger. The Traffic Impact Analysis is included under Tab 2 of the Supporting Documents. (b) Economic impact data shall be provided, including estimates for construction costs, construction employment, and permanent employment and shall demonstrate that the proposed development is favorable to the economy, public services, environment and housing supply of the City. The Economic Impact Study is included under Tab 4 of the Y Supporting Documents. s 99- 13a� i 4' (c) A housing impact assessment. There will be 358 residential units within the development. The average rental price will range from approximately $1,200 to $1,800 per month. (d) A description of proposed energy conservation measures shall be provided, including only those measures that are proposed in addition to the minimum requirements in State Energy Code. (f). IA[rPARDOAl1005815fik3b01 !. DOCr2J0Zt99 Architecturally, the building envelope will be comprised of insulated walls and roof. Tinted glass will be used throughout the building. Electrically, all exterior and landscape lighting will be controlled by means of time clocks and photocell switches. Energy saving lamps, ballasts and fixtures are being considered at cores and public spaces. Historic Buildings There are no historic structures located on the property. Environmental Zone The property is not located within an environmental preservation district. 001 99-- 30"7 Ill. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS F-5 BISCAYNE BAY TOWER MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS ARTICLE III. Supporting Documents Tab 1 Minority Construction Employment Plan Tab 2 Traffic Impact Analysis Tab 3 Site Utility Study Tab 4 Economic Impact Study Tab 5 Survey of Property Tab 6 Drawings Submitted 99- 307 2 �l✓ J TAB 1 P-5 BISCAYNE BAY TOWER MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT MINORITY CONSTRUCTION EMPLOYMENT PLAN g 0 - 307 t .. E It.- MINORITY CONSTRUCTION EMPLOYMENT PLAN It is the policy of the Applicant to base its employee hiring and promotions, as well as its vendor and contractor hiring, on merit, qualifications and competency and that its personnel practices will not be influenced by an applicant's or employee's race, color, place of birth, religion, national origin, sex, sexual orientation, age, marital status, veteran and handicapped status. One of the management duties of the Applicant's principals is to ensure that the following personnel practices are being satisfied: 1. Take every necessary affirmative action to attract and retain qualified employees, regardless of race, color, place of birth, religion, national original, sex, sexual orientation, age, marital status, veteran and handicapped status. 2. Maintain equitable principles in the recruitment, hiring, training, compensation and promotion of employees. 3. Monitor and review personnel practices to guarantee that equal opportunities are being provided to all employees, regardless of race, color, place of birth, religion, national origin, sex, sexual orientation, age, marital status, veteran and handicapped status. The Applicant is committed to take affirmative action and aggressively pursue activities that will serve to enable all employees, vendors and contractors opportunities for employment within the Applicant. Specifically, the Applicant shall utilize the following to achieve the above -referenced Policy: 1. RECRUITMENT/ADVERTISING All contractor and/or employment advertising will include a statement of Equal Employment Opportunity. In addition, advertising will utilize Hispanic and Black media (e.g. Miami Times). 2. HIRING PROCEDURES All positions will be filled without regard to race, color, religion, sex or national origin. The Applicant is dedicated to a policy of equal employment opportunities for minorities. 99- 307 L. =w t I ti.. 3. PROMOTION PROCEDURES The Applicant maintains equitable principles in the promotion of employees as stated in the Affirmative Action Plan. The Affirmative Action Plan is based on the principals' belief that our Dade County community can only improve if the lifestyles of every single disadvantaged group in the community is advanced. We will continually monitor and review personnel and contractor employment practices to guarantee that equal opportunities are being provided to all employees, vendors or contractors regardless of race, color, place of birth, religion, national origin, sex, sexual orientation, age, marital status, veteran and handicapped status. 4. UTILIZATION OF LOCAL MINORITY BUSINESSES The Applicant will endeavor to utilize Black Minority and Women -owned firms. Furthermore, it will require all of its contractors to also solicit and utilize to the fullest extent possible minority and women -owned subcontractors and vendors. MIAMI/DOUGHERTYU1010810/Iny201I.DOC/1/07/99 2 99- 500'7 ol TAB 2 k ) e BISCAYNE BAY TOWER A 358-UNIT RESIDENTIAL APARTMENT DEVELOPMENT NE 36 STREET BETWEEN NE 5 & 7 AVENUES MIAMI, FLORIDA TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS JANUARY 1999 BISCAYNE BAY TOWER A 358 UNIT RESIDENTIAI, APARTMENT DEVELOPMENT NE 36TH STREET BETWEEN NE 5TH & 7TH AVENUES MIAMI, FLORIDA TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Prepared for Biscayne Bay Tower 700 West 51st Street Miami Beach, Florida 33140 Prepared by Transport Analysis Professionals, Inc. 8701 SW 137th Avenue, Suite 210 Miami, Florida 33183 (305) 385-0777 January 1999 8536 99- 30'7 C BISCAYNE BAY TOWER 358 UNIT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT NE 36TH STREET BETWEEN NE 5TH & 7TH AVENUES EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Using the City of Miami's adopted methodology for analyzing transportation corridor traffic impacts, analysis of existing future traffic shows that the proposed Biscayne Bay Tower project can be developed without exceeding level of service standards established by the City. The project is situated less than '/a mile east of Biscayne Boulevard and the bulk of traffic (75 %) generated by the site will use the three arterials in the Biscayne Corridor -- Biscayne Boulevard, NE 2nd Avenue and N. Miami Avenue. An analysis of the corridor reveals that the 125 PM peak hour trips generated by the site represents less than 1.5 % of traffic using the Biscayne Corridor and is fully within the available capacity of the corridor. Conventional level of service analyses revealed localized congestion at intersections in proximity to the proposed site. These localized problems are present both pre- and post construction and do not reflect the overall corridor capacity. Localized traffic impacts can be mitigated by redesign of the pavement markings along NE 36th Street in front of the proposed site. -I- 99-- 30"7 I t "w c•- BISCAYNE BAY TOWER A 358 UNIT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT NE 36TH STREET BETWEEN NE 5TH & 7TH AVENUES MIAMI, FLORIDA TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ....................................... i Introduction ............................................ 1 Other Area Projects ....................................... I Site Traffic Generation and Distribution ........................... 1 Biscayne Corridor Analysis .................................. 3 Intersection Analysis ...................................... 6 Year 2001 Conditions with Background Traffic ...................... 7 Future Conditions with Site Traffic .............................. 7 Biscayne Bay Tower's Site Access .............................. 8 Summary.............................................8 TABLES Table 1 - PM Peak Hour Biscayne Bay Tower Site Traffic ............... 3 Table 2 - Transit Bus Routes ................................. 4 Table 3 - Analysis of Corridor Capacity Using Person -Trips .............. 5 Table 4 - Existing 1998 PM Peak Hour Levels of Service ................ 6 Table 5 - Future Year 2001 LOS Values Without Biscayne Bay Tower Development 7 Table 6 - Future Year 2001 LOS Values with the Biscayne Bay Tower Development 7 FIGURES Figure 1 - General Location Map ............................... 2 Figure 2 - Recommended Roadway Improvements .................... 9 APPENDIX Appendix A - Turning Movement Count Data Appendix B - Capacity Analyses of Existing Conditions Appendix C - Capacity Analyses of 2-year Background Appendix D - Capacity Analyses of 2-year Background and the Biscayne Bay Tower's Traffic Appendix E - ITE Trip Generation 99- 307 BISCAYNE BAY TOWER A 358 UNIT RESIDENTIAL APARTMENT DEVELOPMENT NE 36TH STREET BETWEEN NE 5TH & 7TH AVENUES MIAMI, FLORIDA TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS INTRODUCTION This report summarizes the impact of traffic from a proposed 358 unit residential development located north of NE 36th Street between NE 5th and NE 7th Avenues. The proposed development is scheduled for build -out and occupancy in year 2001. The City's traffic reporting criteria requires that a Major Use Special Permit (MUSP) study be conducted for the proposed development. The general location is shown in Figure 1. The methodology used for assessing traffic impacts of the proposed apartment complex was approved by the City of Miami Department of Planning staff. Traffic impacts in the City of Miami are measured using two methodologies -- intersection analysis and corridor capacity analysis. Since this project is situated near Biscayne Boulevard, the corridor analysis is used to measure the projects overall traffic impact. The intersection analysis measures localized conditions and identifies areas where mitigation may be used to improve local traffic congestion. OTHER AREA PROTECTS The City of Miami Planning staff was contacted on September 30, 1998 and it was determined that there are no approved projects that are yet to be built in this area of Miami that could ultimately affect the level of service. SITE TRAFFIC GENERATION AND DISTRIBUTION Using the sixth edition of the ITE Trip Generation manual, PM peak hour traffic is calculated for the Biscayne Bay Tower's site and depicted in Table 1. 1 99-- 30 LASON Systems, Inc. S.I. 6954 N.W. 12 STREET, MIAMI, FLORIDA 33126 305-477-9149 • 800-287-4799 • FAX 305-477-7526 THE FOLLOWING IS AN IT WILL TAKE MULTIPLE IMAGES P= UU UU Ul U. ��'85 � Jui.a hne Gause..av g 14NI AVTS F !ure I General Location Map 99- 307 Table 1 PM Peak hour Biscayne Bay Tower Site Traffic Daily PM Peak Hour Project Land Use Trips In Out Total Biscayne Bay Towers Apartments - 358 units 1,504 75 50 125 The Miami -Dade County Public Works Department was contacted to obtain the cardinal distribution data as set forth in the MUATS model to determine directional trip making characteristics of area traffic. The following information was used as a guide to distribute site traffic via area roadways: North/northeast - 13.78 % North/northwest - 17.75 % East/northeast - 5.92 % West/northwest - 15.80 % East/southeast - 4.28 % West/southwest - 11.45 % South/southeast - 13.53% South/southwest - 17.50% BISCAYNE CORRIDOR ANALYSIS The City of Miami adopted a methodology for assessing proposed site impacts called the corridor analysis. The analysis is discussed in detail in a document called: Transportation Corridors adopted February 1989 and is included in the Transportation Element of the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000. To summarily define a corridor analysis, the following is text obtained from the Transportation Corridor Publication: ... "this concept is based upon a new method for measuring passenger transportation levels of service (LOS) wherein the fundamental measure of travel is the person -trip, not the vehicle; and the Transportation Corridor analysis is the sum of two or more modes of person -trip travel, instead of the vehicular capacity of a roadway. The Biscayne Corridor includes three roadways -- Biscayne Boulevard, N. Miami Avenue and NE 2nd Avenue. The corridor analysis presents the person trip capacity of the three roadways in the corridor. A 2% annual growth is assumed for traffic in the project area. A 2% growth rate has been generally accepted by the City from information presented and approved in other recent traffic studies of area growth. 3 9 9 e 907 c The Miami -Dade Public Works Department and the Florida Department of Transportation were contacted to determine the existing hourly traffic volume occurring during the PM peak period (4:00 - 6:00 PM) on the three study roadways in the Biscayne Corridor. The Table below depicts each roadway's maximum allowable level of service (LOS) volume (two-way) and the existing traffic volume. (The existing volume is based on the average of the two highest hours in the PM peak period.) Max LOS Existing Committed Available Roadway Volume Volume Trips Trips Biscayne Boulevard 2,720 3,383' 0 <663> N. Miami Avenue 2,720 1,8652 0 855 N.E. 2nd Avenue 2,720 1,1282 0 1,592 ' Count date: April 1997 factored to the build -out year (2001) include a 2% per year growth. 2 Count date: November 1998 factored to the build -out year (2001) include a 2% per year growth. The Service Planning & Scheduling Division of the Metro -Dade Transit Agency was contacted for information regarding bus routes and headways along the three study roadways. Table 2 summarizes the information obtained from the Transit Agency. Table 2 Transit Bus Routes PM Peak Period Roadway Route Headway Biscayne Blvd. 3 Every 20 minutes Biscayne Blvd. 16 Every 20 minutes Biscayne Blvd. Bisc. max Every 20 minutes Biscayne Blvd. J Every 20 minutes N. Miami Ave. None None N.E. 2nd Ave. 9 Every 10 minutes N.E. 2nd Ave. 10 Every 10 minutes Buses per Hour: 20 Persons per bus: 50 Total Persons capacity: 1,000 persons per hour 4 99- 30"7 N k- Table 3 shows that in year 2001 with project traffic included, the combined person -trip capacity for automobiles and transit (bus) is above the trip demand during the PM peak hour. Table 3 Analysis of Corridor Capacity Using Person -Trips Biscayne Corridor Roadway Capacity (vehicles): 8,160 vehicles per hour' Vehicle Occupancy: 1.40 persons per vehicle Roadway Capacity (persons): 11,424 persons per hour Transit Capacity (local bus): 1,000 person trips per hour Corridor Capacity: 12,424 person trips per hour Year 2001 Conditions (without project) Roadway Volume (Vehicles): 6,376 vehicles Current Occupancy: 1.4 persons per vehicle Roadway Volume (persons): 8,926 trips per hour Transit Usage: 700 person trips per hour' Excess Capacity in Corridor: 2,798 person trips per hour Year 2001 Plus Project Roadway Volume (vehicles): 6,501 vehicles Current Occupancy: 1.4 persons per vehicle Roadway Volume (persons): 9,101 person trips per hour Transit Usage: 1,000 person trips per hour (100% of existing) Excess Capacity in Corridor: 2,673 person trips per hour ' Combined maximum LOS volume of all three roadways (3*2,720=8,160 vph) z Estimate provided by City of Miami Planning Department 5 99" 307 A t` T INTERSECTION ANALYSIS During the last week of August and the first week of September 1998, peak period turning movement counts were performed between 4:00-6:00 PM at five local key intersections study locations. A one -hour average of the two highest consecutive one - hour periods of the PM peak is typically used to evaluate traffic conditions throughout Miami -Dade County. It is also the period in which traffic concurrency is evaluated by the Miami -Dade County Public Works Department. The field data are in the Appendix. Intersection analyses were performed at each of the five study locations using Highway Capacity Software (HCS) that supports the 1994 Highway Capacity Manual. The HCS outputs are included in the Appendix. Table 4 summarizes existing PM peak hour levels of service (LOS) at the study locations. Table 4 Existing 1998 PM Peak Hour Levels of Service Location LOS' NE 5th Avenue & NE 36th Street F (EBL)(EBR)(WBL) NE 2nd Avenue & NE 36th Street F (EBL) Biscayne Boulevard & NE 36th Street F (All Approaches) Biscayne Boulevard & NE 38th Street F (WBL)(NBL)(NBT) Biscayne Boulevard & NE 33rd Street A ' Depicts worse case approach LOS (EBL) = Eastbound Left (EBR) = Eastbound Right (WBL) = Westbound Left (NBL) = Northbound Left (NBT) = Northbound Through 99 - 63o7 r1_ YEAR 2001 CONDITIONS WITH BACKGROUND TRAFFIC With all future background growth distributed through the study intersections, a LOS analysis was performed to measure future impacts at each study location. During the analysis, it was noted that timing patterns at the signalized intersections under study could be modified slightly to improve operating conditions. With the modified timing in place, the study locations were analyzed and will have the LOS depicted in Table 5 prior to adding any Biscayne Bay Tower's site traffic. Table 5 Future Year 2001 LOS Values Without the Biscayne Bay Tower Development Location LOS' NE 5th Avenue & NE 36th Street F (EBL)(EBR)(WBL) NE 2nd Avenue & NE 36th Street F (EBL) Biscayne Boulevard & NE 36th Street F (All Approaches) Biscayne Boulevard & NE 38th Street F (WBL)(NBL)(NBT) Biscayne Boulevard & NE 33rd Street B ' LOS depicted at worst case approach FUTURE CONDITIONS WITH SITE TRAFFIC Table 6 depicts the LOS at the five study locations including a three-year growth and the Biscayne Bay Towers site. Table 6 Future Year 2001 LOS Values with the Biscayne Bay Tower Site Location LOS NE 5th Avenue & NE 36th Street F (EBL)(EBR)(WBL) NE 2nd Avenue & NE 36th Street F (EBL) Biscayne Boulevard & NE 36th Street F (All Approaches) Biscayne Boulevard & NE 38th Street F (WBL)(NBL)(NBT) Biscayne Boulevard & NE 33rd Street B 7 99- 307 i PP I A.- BISCAYNE BAY TOWER'S SITE ACCESS The developers propose to close NE 6th and 7th Avenues to accommodate the physical building's footprint. The tower will be situated on a parking pedestal with the main access situated about where NE 6th Avenue is presently located. An ancillary access point is proposed from NE 5th Avenue. SUMMARY Local intersection analyses indicate a level of service (LOS) condition of "F". Prior to and after project build -out and occupancy. However, the Biscayne Corridor analysis indicates an excess person trip capacity of 4,305 trips per hour indicating that the overall area will easily accommodate the proposed site traffic. The proposed site's access for building residents will be located near NE 6th Avenue and NE 36th Street. Truck access will be accommodated at NE 7th Avenue (ingress only) and at NE 5th Avenue (egress only.) NE 36th Street is about 48 feet wide at the site's proposed driveways. Currently, three (3) lanes are marked to accommodate one (1) westbound lane (14' 3" wide) and two (2) eastbound lanes that use the remaining 33 feet +/- of pavement. The developer can help mitigate local traffic impacts along NE 36th Street between NE 5th and 7th Avenues by changing the existing lane geometry to accommodate separate left turns into the site -- one lane westbound and two lanes eastbound. All can be accomplished without widening the existing roadway. This configuration will allow the residents driveway intersection (NE 6th Avenue and NE 36th Street) to operate at a LOS "C" condition. We recommend that the roadway be marked as depicted in Figure 2. 8 9 9 - 307 4 SITE f �31 J3, Arl, NE 36 ST > NTS r. . Figure 2 Recommended Roadway Improvements 9 99- 307 i °b' APPENDIX 99- 307 0 vw 7- E APPENDIX A =_ TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT DATA 99- 307 TRANSPORT ANALYSIS PROFESSIONALS, Inc. Reference.: 8536 PAGE: 1 N-S Street: BISCAYNE BOULEVARD FILE: B8236PM E-W Street: N.E. 36th STREET Operator : .................................................................................................................................. DAB / NFM Movements by: All Veh DATE: 9/02/98 PEAK PERIOD ANALYSIS FOR THE PERIOD: 4:00 PM - 6:00 PM DIRECTIONSTART PEAK MR ........... VOLUMES ........... ...... PERCENTS ....... ............................................................................................... PEAK HOUR FACTOR RTOR Right Thru Left Total RTOR Right Thru Left S'bnd 4:45 PM 0.86 28 235 1198 491 1952 1 12 61 25 W'bnd 5:00 PM 0.80 77 396 117 338 928 8 43 13 36 N'bnd 5:00 PM 0.90 82 166 1945 151 2364 3 8 82 6 E'bnd 5:00 PM 0.74 13 69 382 205 669 2 10 57 31 Entire Intersection S'bnd 5:00 PM 0.86 27 227 1228 469 1951 1 12 63 24 W'bnd 0.80 77 396 117 338 928 8 43 13 36 N'bnd 0.90 82 186 1945 151 2364 3 8 82 6 E'bnd 0.74 13 69 382 205 669 2 10 57 31 BISCAYNE BOULEVARD N'1' . 2 5 4 6 227 1228 469 8��" r✓% 495 N.E. 36th STREET . Y 205 382 669 69 J �W - 1951 1 N W--}-E S 77 [RTOR ) 99- 90'7 u TRANSPORT ANALYSIS PROFESSIONALS, Inc. tference.: 8536 PACE: 1 N-S Street: BISCAYNE BOULEVARD FILE: 69236PM E-W Street: N.E. 36th STREET Operator : .................................................................................................................................. DAB / NFH Movements by: All Veh DATE: 9/02/98 i Time .......... S'bnd .... .......... W'bnd .... .......... 11'bnd .... .......... E'bnd .... Vehicle RTOR Begin RTOR AT THRU LT RTOR AT THRU LT RTOR AT THRU LT RTOR AT THRU LT Total Total S .................................................................................................................................. 4:00 PM 4 49 234 68 26 59 22 66 9 32 353 34 4 19 67 43 1089 43 4:15 4 52 229 79 28 66 18 69 10 30 361 28 5 27 65 48 1119 47 4:30 5 72 263 93 22 91 26 60 15 39 396 40 5 17 55 48 1247 47 4:45 4 47 301 104 24 92 35 67 6 44 436 41 1 15 62 34 1313 35 MR TOTAL 17 220 ID27 344 100 308 101 262 40 145 1546 143 15 78 249 173 4768 172 5:00 PM 9 54 275 109 23 74 37 62 12 33 446 40 5 22 138 62 1401 49 5:15 8 80 319 160 21 70 19 72 15 55 499 45 2 22 79 43 1509 46 5:30 7 54 303 118 17 110 29 104 27 54 542 34 4 12 90 58 1563 55 5:45 3 39 331 82 16 142 32 100 28 44 45B 32 2 13 75 42 1439 49 MR TOTAL 27 227 1228 469 77 396 117 338 82 186 1945 151 13 69 382 205 $912 199 ................................................................................................................................... TOTAL 44 447 2255 813 177 704 218 600 122 331 3491 294 28 147 631 378 10680 371 PEAK PERIOD ANALYSIS FOR THE PERIOD: 4:00 PM - 6:00 PM DIRECTION START PEAK MR ........... VOLUMES ........... ...... PERCENTS ....... ............................................................................................... PEAK HOUR FACTOR RTOR Right Thru Left Total RTOR Right Thru Left S'b d 4:45 PM 0.86 28 235 1198 49'� IZ52 1 12 61 25 W'b d 5:00 PM 0.80 77 396 117 338 928 8 43 13 36 — Nlbnd 5:00 PM 0.90 82 186 1945 151 2364 3 8 82 6 E'bid 5:00 PM 0.74 13 69 3B2 205 669 2 10 57 31 — Entire Intersection — S'bnd 5:00 PM 0.86 27 227 1228 469 1951 1 12 63 24 W'bnd 0.80 77 396 117 338 928 8 43 13 36 N'bnd 0.90 82 186 1945 151 2364 3 8 82 6 E'bnd 0.74 13 69 382 205 669 2 10 57 31 99- 307 30 rl- TRANSPORT ANALYSIS PROFESSIONALS, Inc. Reference.: 8536 PAGE: 1 N-S Street: N.E. 5th AVENUE FILE: 3625PM E-W Street: N.E. 36th STREET Operator : .................................................................................................................................. PCC Movements by: All Veh DATE: 9/02/98 PEAK PERIOD ANALYSIS FOR THE PERIOD: 4:00 PM - 6:00 PM DIRECTION START PEAK HR ........ VOLUMES ........ .... PERCENTS ... ............................................................................................... PEAK HOUR FACTOR Right Thru Left Total Right Thru Left S'bnd 4:30 PM 0.33 3 1 0 4 75 25 0 W'bnd 5:00 PM 0.85 1 43 0 44 2 98 0 N'bnd 4:45 PM 0.89 71 0 7 78 91 0 9 E'bnd 5:00 PM 0.90 6 1039 4 1049 1 99 0 Entire Intersection S'bnd 5:00 PM 0.25 1 0 0 1 %100 0 0 W'bnd 0.85 1 43 0 44 2 98 0 N'bnd 0.89 69 0 9 78 88 0 12 E'bnd 0.90 6 1039 4 1049 1 99 0 1 1039 1049 61 N.E. 5th AVENUE 5a 1 F 44 L 78-7 0 1 69 1 43 n 99- 307 jTRANSPORT ANALYSIS PROFESSIONALS, Inc. Reference.: 8S36 PAGE: 1 N•S Street: N.E. Sth AVENUE FILE: 3605PH E-ll Street: N.E. 36th STREET Movements••.All DATE.8 ...........................................................................................................-- Time S'bnd Y'bnd N'bnd E'bnd Vehicle Begin RT THRU LT RT THRU LT RT THRU LT RT THRU LT Total .................................................................................................................................. 4:OD PH 0 0 0 0 10 0 15 0 2 3 162 0 192 4:15 0 0 0 0 5 0 7 0 1 0 174 0 187 4:30 0 0 0 0 3 1 9 1 0 0 192 0 206 4:45 2 1 0 0 4 1 16 0 0 1 207 1 233 HR TOTAL 2 1 0 0 22 2 47 1 3 4 735 1 818 5:00 PH 0 0 0 0 8 0 19 0 0 0 279 1 307 5:15 1 0 0 0 13 0 18 0 3 3 287 1 326 5:30 0 0 0 1 9 0 18 0 4 1 261 2 296 5:45 0 0 0 0 13 0 14 0 2 2 212 0 243 HR TOTAL 1 0 0 1 43 0 69 0 9 6 1039 4 1172 .................................................................................................................................. TOTAL 3 1 0 1 65 2 116 1 12 10 1774 5 1990 PEAK PERIOD ANALYSIS FOR THE PERIOD: 4:00 PM - 6:00 PH DIRECTION START PEAK HR ........ VOLUMES PERCENTS ... PEAK HOUR FACTOR Right Thru Left Total Right Thru Left ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5'bnd 4:30 PM 0.33 3 1 0 4 75 25 0 V'bnd 5:00 PH 0.85 1 43 0 44 2 98 0 N'bnd 4:45 PH 0.89 71 0 7 78 91 0 9 E'bnd 5:00 PH 0.90 6 1039 4 1049 1 99 0 Entire intersection S'bnd 5:00 PM 0.25 1 0 0 1 %100 0 0 u'bnd 0.85 1 43 0 44 2 98 0 N'bnd 0.89 69 0 9 78 88 0 12 E'bnd 0.90 6 1039 4 1049 1 99 0 s9- 3,a7 tp. A TRANSPORT ANALYSIS PROFESSIONALS, Inc. eference.: 8536 PAGE: 1 N•S Street: BISCAYNE BOULEVARD FILE: BB838PM E-V Street: N.E. 38th STREET Operator : .................................................................................................................................. DAB / NFH Movements by: All Veh DATE: 8/31/98 PEAK PERIOD ANALYSIS FOR THE PERIOD: 4:00 PM - 6:00 PM DIRECTIONSTART PEAK HR ........... VOLUMES ........... ...... PERCENTS ....... ............................................................................................... PEAK HOUR FACTOR RTOR Right Thru Left Total RTOR Right Thru Left S'bnd 4:30 PM 0.93 2 40 1244 372 1658 0 2 75 22 W'bnd 4:30 PM 0.88 152 343 100 458 1053 14 33 9 43 N'bnd 4:15 PM 0.95 25 285 1565 23 1898 1 15 B2 1 E'bnd 4:15 PM 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Entire Intersection S'bnd 4:30 PM 0.93 2 40 1244 372 1658 0 2 75 22 V'bnd 0.88 152 343 100 458 1053 14 33 9 43 N'bnd 0.94 20 288 1542 29 1879 1 15 82 2 E'bnd 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 BISCAYNE BOULEVARD N W--j--E S 1885 1244 372 152 [RTOR J - 1658 � 343 F 1053 100 L 458 N.E. 38th STREET ------------ 660 1879 90_ J07 t:,. m TRANSPORT ANALYSIS PROFESSIONALS, Inc. Aeference.: 8536 PAGE: 1 N-S Street: BISCAYNE BOULEVARD FILE: 88238Pf1 E.W Street: N.E. 38th STREET Operator : DAB / NFH Movements by: All Veh DATE: 8/31/98 .................................................................................................................................. Time .......... S'bnd .... .......... 11'bnd .... .......... N'bnd .... .......... E'bnd Vehicle RTOR Begin RTOR RT THRU LT RTOR RT THRU LT RTOR RT THRU LT RTOR RT THRU LT Total Total .................................................................................................................................. 4:00 PM 1 5 234 85 43 62 19 84 7 68 359 7 0 0 0 0 974 51 4:15 1 1 242 64 37 77 37 88 6 68 415 2 0 0 0 0 1058 44 4:30 1 11 315 118 49 102 39 109 7 69 414 10 0 0 0 0 1244 57 4:45 0 10 323 73 38 74 23 127 4 70 363 9 0 0 0 0 1114 42 MR TOTAL 3 27 1114 360 167 315 118 408 24 275 1551 28 0 0 0 0 4390 194 5:00 PM 1 10 314 99 32 68 21 109 8 78 373 2 0 0 0 0 111$ 41 5:15 0 9 292 82 33 99 17 113 1 71 392 8 0 0 0 0 1117 34 5:30 1 6 313 86 24 72 19 80 2 70 371 4 0 0 0 0 1048 27 5:45 0 6 269 75 44 46 17 67 3 68 367 4 0 0 0 0 966 47 MR TOTAL 2 31 11B8 342 133 285 74 369 14 287 1503 18 0 0 0 0 4246 149 .................................................................................................................................. TOTAL 5 58 2302 702 300 600 192 777 3B 562 3054 46 0 0 0 0 8636 343 PEAK PERIOD ANALYSIS FOR THE PERIOD: 4:00 PM - 6:00 PM DIRECTION START PEAK MR ........... VOLUMES ........... ...... PERCENTS ....... PEAK HOUR FACTOR RTOR Right Thru Left Total RTOR Right Thru Left ................. S'bnd 4:30 PM 0.93 2 40 1244 372 1658 0 2 75 22 1l'bnd 4:30 PM 0.88 152 343 100 458 1053 14 33 9 43 N'bnd 4:15 PM 0.95 25 285 1565 23 1898 1 15 82 1 E'bnd 4:15 PM 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Entire Intersection S'bnd 4:30 PM 0.93 2 40 1244 372 1658 0 2 75 22 Y'bnd 0.88 152 343 100 458 1053 14 33 9 43 N'bnd 0.94 20 288 1542 29 1879 1 15 82 2 E'bnd 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 99- 30"7 TRANSPORT ANALYSIS PROFESSIONALS, Inc. Reference.: $536 PAGE: 1 N-S Street: BISCAYNE BLVD FILE: BS233PM E-Y Street: NE 33RD STREET Operator : .................................................................................................................................. DAB Movements by: All Veh DATE: 9/01/98 PEAK PERIOD ANALYSIS FOR THE PERIOD: 4:00 PM - 6:00 PM DIRECTION START PEAK HR ........... VOLUMES ........... ...... PERCENTS ....... PEAK HOUR FACTOR RTOR Right Thru Left Total RTOR Right Thru Left ............................................................................................... S'bnd 4:30 PM 0.90 0 18 1354 28 1400 0 1 97 2 V'bnd 5:00 PM 0.80 5 16 8 22 51 10 31 16 43 N'bnd 5:00 PM 0.93 1 27 2112 44 2184 0 1 97 2 E'bnd 4:30 PM 0.94 12 4 5 9 30 40 13 17 30 Entire Intersection S'bnd 5:00 PM 0.88 0 18 1306 39 1363 0 1 96 3 V'bnd 0.80 5 16 8 22 51 10 31 16 43 N'bnd 0.93 1 27 2112 44 2184 0 1 97 2 E'bnd 0.84 6 3 8 10 27 22 11 30 37 BISCAYNE BLVD :gg?�aggeesr, ff' 18 1306 39''' r:.: s 51111. 7 0 NE 33RD STREET 10 8 27 J3 1363 J AEA N A W—•�—E S r 5 [RTOR ] r 16 51 8 22 >r`> t w004••w.�;c3..:Hrri�s!;,✓.•r� s•: xs;aM;>,:r:`•�s.�: Hr I.?! . fi?y.H,r •`ri Jr l..^. (<N.y� 9 9 307 L. 0 t4' OTHER CONSIDERATIONS Public Sector Costs Given that a community has embarked on economic development which could involve increases in permanent residents, a major concern is the proper balance between the public sector revenues and the cost associated with the various forms this development may take. Public policy might seek to enhance development with beneficial net effects on the public sector, or at least avoid development having clearly adverse effects. Some of the costs that must be considered are required increases in the following: • Public Safety (police and fire) • Highways • Health and Environmental Services Parks and Recreation • Capital Improvements (Infra structure) Schools The objective of this report is not to measure the potential increases in public sector costs that may result from the development and operations of this project. Nor was this report's objective to compare the fiscal benefits with cost that may result from this project. Therefore we will not attempt to quantify such factors. We did feel it was necessary to make mention of certain potential fiscal costs that must be considered. Impact Fees A very significant factor in measuring the economic impact on a specific region of a project are impact and other required development fees. When a development occurs in the region being measured (Miami), specific fees must be paid to the region within which the development is to occur. A summary of the fees are listed below: • City of Miami Developmental Impact Fee • Administrative Fee • City of Miami Developmental Admin Fee • Building Permit Fee • Dade County School Impact Fee • Installation Energy Fee • Other Fees For the purpose of this economic impact analysis, fees are included as a part of the direct development cost (output). Impact fees total approximately $1.4 million and other fees total approximately $800,000. These fees are shown in detail in Exhibit VII. BISCAYNE BAY TOWER - Economic Impact Study January 7, 1999 Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. 9 a _ 307 Page 15 ■ i BISCAYNE BAY TOWER SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS 99- '93307 r_. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS Based upon the preceding in-depth analysis of the Biscayne Bay Tower Project, it appears that such a development can bring significant economic benefits to Greater Miami. This final section reviews the results of the employment opportunities, public sector revenues and total economic benefits on the City as a result of the development. Employment Total development phase employment will be approximately 129 and on -going annual employment resulting from the maintenance of the Project will be approximately 14. Tax Revenue The analysis of public sector revenues associated with the development includes taxes and other revenues generated directly by the project. Although public sector cost is a important element in measuring fiscal impact, for purposes of this project such cost have not been quantified. This analysis only measured the benefits derived from the project. Total tax revenues expected to be created annually are $1.1 million. Output The analysis of total economic impact is measured by total output. This analysis measures the economic impact of development cost and outgoing, operational expenditures. To determine the effect of respending within Greater Miami, we utilized a multiplier to compute total direct and indirect benefits. Total output expected to be generated as a result of the development and operation of the project will approximate: One Time $64,045,691 Annual $ 3,100,680 BISCAYNE BAY TOWER - Economic Impact Study Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. It. - January 7,1999 fi a '307 Page 16 EXHIBIT LIST Exhibit I Summary of Economic Impact Exhibit 11 Summary of all Direct Economic Benefits Exhibit III Computation of Indirect Benefits Exhibit IV Schedule of Project Development Cost Exhibit V Schedule of Ad Valorem Taxes Exhibit VI Allocation of Ad Valorem Taxes Exhibit VII Impact and Other Fees BISCAYNE BAY TOWER - Economic Impact Study January 7, 1999 Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A.nn Page 17 <<,, m z. BISCAYNE BAY TOWER ECONOMIC BENEFITS STUDY SUMMARY OF ECONOMIC IMPACT • jc r � Ht� �h �P' '.+� D.$35,742,258 —71 OUTPUT 1,650,000 WAGES EMPLOYMENT $8,550,000 129 350,000 14,i'• _ e�,y s4 � > � �,�,.�•;. r r r a. ���+Y��� ey. 7a.7yse $37,392,258 r. 11 111 143 nt1 �} B� f a Fig r iiZj"!.q,r.y? 1,433 2�+�}} }4 1 �'-k 1,450,680 t," � k.� r � y i:t iy'i �e•,i�t,''ti��t+i1��,grq� � n •� r r� Y BISCAYNE BAY TOWER ECONOMIC BENEFITS STUDY SUMMARY OF DIRECT ECONOMIC BENEFITS NUMBER• EMPLOYEEs9 . • \EQT I]OS f _ t �'` t 111 111 a' x 5i`s;�r� { �� �y50,000 50 1 1 1 't 3,500,000 w Yy f��:t tF `�L9 4�'L�Y F13 �����a���F 4.:a �#.��'^St{�� • r� t a Lfi3�jt4 1 �Yi�S��`•i L7r Py 'L 'y` x / $37,392.25i • X _Z BISCAYNE BAY TOWER ECONOMIC BENEFITS STUDY SUMMARY OF OF INDIRECT BENEFITS • . EXPENDITURE ••. APPLICABLE MULTIPLIER COMPUTED INDIRECT BENEFIT 14 i! L�- 1 v aJ+{�• 1�1z�`! 'tf4 if"r„6tyL'�G'�'` j5t��1 111 111 0.8792 : ' 11 %J, {+h3 S�rrt 16,800 26,192,258 0.8792 23,028,233 }�. © 8 L 0• • ; 19 1 47��-.f J ; i'S Q 0 7r s+X : : 1 : • m x w lW EXHIBIT IV BISCAYNE BAY TOWER ECONOMIC BENEFITS STUDY PROJECT DEVELOPMENT COST % SPENT IN Y TYPE OF COST �`. DADEN HARD ;,COSTS BASE:, NG/PARKING 100% $30,000,000 -BUILD _ 100% 2,000,000 IANDrAtr 1 �tMPACT FEES t 100% 1,383,014 PERMIT FEES .; 100% 789,244 160MMON AREA_FURNISHING 100% 400,000 COSTOFMODELS 100% 120,000 CO�N�TINGENCIES '''' : ` 100% 2,000,000 TOTAL, HARD COSTS 100% $36,692,258 RtJDGFTED 'SOFT _COSTS_..' 4f ' 100% 4,000,000 FINANCING` `&,MARKETING : 100% $40,692,258 MARKETING COSTS .. = ' 100% $100,000 FINANCING COST. =-f FINANCING',COSTS AND. FEES ` ` 100% $700,000 INTEREST' 100% 2,800,000 a `COSTS Y rt $3,500,000 rT01'AUP:FINANCING TOTAL -PROJECT ' COST 100% $44,292,258 99— 330 w- M BISCAYNE BAY TOWER ECONOMIC BENEFITS STUDY IMPACT AND OTHER FEES IMPACT AND OTHER FEES A Development Square Footages `1) Total gross building area (excluding balconies) 3 .2 2) Maximum development area'(FAR) 3) Net apartment area r ' 4) ,Gross' parking :area B impact Fees 1)vCRV of Miami Development Impact Fee (Ord 10426) 2).City.of, Miami Development ,impact Admm Fee 3)';Dade County School Impact Fee 4)'Dade C©unty Roadway Impact Fee : . jTotal of ail Impact Feir es ' <. L r z '.41 lui�r„i rlari� WAS A'-.'r_nnnpctinn fees". EXHIBIT VII Square Footage 4 " 510,000 434,000 s 418,000 192,000 f ' Amount $423,398 I 12,702 611,826 335,088 �yt t r d ;,,t x.a..... Y , f . �t.y ° 3) Installation Energy Fee 1 v51-rtR aS •-.Z S-t'slSxyn rW I c ur pfaET.(legair, 6 5 Ma or'.Use S ecial Permit Application Fee }� k 6}'.Dade County Code,Compliance Y r 7 -Radon as Fee ' t 8) Fire Pian Review. Fee.. = 9) GroundrCover.Feer ,10 Land Use/Zoning . j 1.1) `Zoning Review for Building Permit.Fee ,sTotal of all Non Impact Fees ,t Tatai�of all+Fees for Project Note: Fees above were calculated using information obtained from the City of Miami Planning, Building and Zoning Department, October 26, 1998. $500,484 143,800 63,000 25,000 30,000 15,000 3,150 6,160 1,400 940 60 250 35 $789,244 9 9 - "a7 t._ s. ■ I 0 TAB 5 l l.- LAgON Systems, Inc. $.1 pRInA 3312 STREET, MIAMIFA 305-4??-1526 6954N, W. 4199 30 5 -4� �-914 9.800 -2 81- dvLeNoOAr 1s �" PI.F®�A%X S WTI wrAIKSmu t�- co En 07 Co 0 Q CU L U C7 G2 cn � I 1 L ' CI) o') LD 3 C7 / 1 1L,- IEGE' e •rat _ w . e r . ry el+o » r - nn.� ovew Dunn a/.. Nri7�.b•rt tat � O�w•Q S0O m C-.�JM1.bn!'y( ICK • •,�~ a •'ORLM. UHc/M7 tLXS_1 (7/70/06) r.} +:a .[••[ , INTERSTATE V "JULIA TUTTLE CAUSEW ("36 STREET EXPRESSWAY", PER CITY ATLAS b mn 01 witm." IPrP CM ATLAS, S"EQ .. IV) My LANC DEDCATED PCe PUT B001[ 1, PA.,C 115 FOUND 1/2• PIPE f• ND CAP (7/20/GB)• r c... c„ � 6_4 .,. ....... lurt k4:. %"-'r 1!I ,a ::�:L.: •: ::>., �, •� it �.. c er 1 =..3. a0. R/w 1: s,I IVCR. DoI moo .:.. .. - �I_STORY BUILDING ' ;..)• 1-STORY _ sl •K'._� (]f7) % BUILDING tr •.;�•.' I I tcrc.rtR nba en•1v, t.a. Ly I s•i �\ _ S 0 n.2 18 4725 .tU05Q•Ilq Fl!el : 5D. I. L/ I• . KRES a7t7 SO n2 �ro 5quN Feei I I ,1 ! ' ..•'. I r I� IW �e :.77' :,.,,.,i...t I.`r` yp o.tt ;tali h Z11i ( ? �..1 w n� i,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,e I' ,• I I I W r I% +f 6` y I- .. b., •. 1 I Pu ertq .y,...a 2-Si DRY tVILD!NC ,• t ' F0+1KaCs 1585BUILDING W re5quee15605q e e FPe1 i . •yo � / � . II i0.1l5 s K°CS I( �L 7cE_ • �� a •`I,� ,•. ). y, 1 ..... , c•... `«LKr" - L>. I. SC. n.t tw ! \ s0:2 so. n .2 ;� •i1' 0.11 RC5 0.12 KRES i� I jL14r Kw.���Y W 1 i I I I z I° ]ET ............. ...... ! t-STORY oc 1[ I I Z 1 STORY, 11. , BUILDING 1-STORY BUILDING Ytt, •'•1 I ✓II I I `) I 1 i.. • Ic � - BUILDI al74 50. n,2i16605qu"e Fee!: I� 0.11 ACRESr1 g7,•7a,r ..11 . / nml 41,•11u• , w I �: - I i SDI N ! DISK 13DO Squae Feel Se • I= Square Feel 1 P s. S NAy ! DISK aC.O P/1r LLM 3 (7,120/4!) , 1.( 1C. I O/7D/4e) s•I .0 70.00' S•I L1' : d , e)1 s0. c.n KRCi A. E .Er..` ' .1 .�h• :� 2S.00' / I r 90'10.25• ,• - I„ /, lo.: •0. ! :ni u /' I Lw.e SET NML & DISK �- e - - d159.94' LB3653 (7/20/98 c�L <C' . i• :: a: n i�f I ., �� .;..:.n� ) wa • p ... R. 2500' A- W3'44• - I ` 1c L- 39.22' I �.• ...••? ? SET 1/2• PIPE k CAP ,u ^QFar..•r. 1K SET 1/2' P;PE ��•/. I LB3653 (7/20/98) Rf., i^"'0 '•'lAt LB]653 (7/20/S°) �,_ - - -{- - - � - a- - - - Tar•-N.T-19-EaZ. ciaf=.7� - - -� - - , urt �g N.E. 36th -------- ----------------------- ------------ INTERSTATE HIGHWAY 195 8_iT LANE _'_ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LEGAL DrscalPrloN: ul Leat i am.eee K Iwb..: 7( w( W q 7 f Lc+. 1-!, 61 3, e rec_1 n -1 4eoa 1!, el Paq. 7].c °I In• 1 J if mot• I I o W I w e l i w J% �L1 J (E] > I ` I L... IM I-.9 A) Jrc (_ e q I-L., °c ,:..0 q p0.7 °I 6.W Ilf6. t Fe a M. ` r., Io•bn Lol !. •t Bb<f 3, 1 CST MIM, a 11 be IM P•bt pecb0. pr Doa [o.nlr. ; D.p:n el IM N°rlMe.t °I . I Lel F, cr..... 29n+ent lr�' 58C6 1-.I Ce.L ` O.lel OI .OE Lel !; InNH NeRM•./ Fbnq sde E. to lM Panl pl leplmlinq, a 0 y Z11Ju ! J z W NO (p (N ! 7 I 2 Z t ( 2 ( ] ♦ I I •Sr I I 7 3 . 'Wt /� I / D] A 1 IFne 5 le.l :n 'Gin ° . IM L1U 1, 2. 2. ] erW . N Seca U 1, *1M. 1 Po:nl 5°Een+.•w. e, 11 r.c 11,d W010 r Pbl 01 Y mi-Ood. Cwnl), r-e.. W I I ) ( I ( ( I ( ( I f / J 1 C) Tn 1 perl OI L°I 1, in dOtf 2 0l Me.l Pc Pbl BOot i!, Pap. 7] of +M Pupfc ROCVPf O < fNre•1 le IM NerlMo.t Iq:r.q p . b�nq longln{ 10 Inc Co.l I'qM of ) fne o Isnglnl to • fM 6 Il.l 11Yin el en! D) 1n.1 Po.t OI LOI f, S1 111-1 2 el well Pt Pbt Boot 1!, Pogc 73. I IM p,infc rgbe. longlnl 10 O f S I'llNprin 1 one po.tlb f) M7 Pon pl t°I t, i1 BbcL 3 1 MKI P. Pb1 B°oL I!, POpptt IM IS OI {M PL t pKb01 • c1.rr..encor. la NerIMKerirlq a q:np IOMInI to iM Co.{ r'pnl PI oI GM ° Dt:nq IPngenl le o W S IKl Norm of o.b �' SCALE: 1•. 60' LOCATION SKETCH Ij Thel po.l of lel f, M Bock ] of MKI P. r - tr.1..enter. 10 IM NorlMell Miuq I1nq.M t° IM MKI hqn{ of .0) fM p/ N.L Ieng1M le s fob 5 N.1 Norm of OM perbN A rl I O tyl PI, SHEET No. 1 SP SET t/2' PIPE AND CAP P.0 8. ("N.N.) No. 15P) 07N.L. . SIOCK WTS or rjvvCSS*xT (PER CM XT.AS. SmL[l ., --- I- - , "'. , IT "". N toy a i MOO' I.E. C", '1tJ.s, s»L17 .. S,) nvu w, 0.1 1 ACRES 0 et ACRES ........... VACANT NO BUILDINGS 5 8 4725 SO. Ml 11 0. ACRES .726 so. rt. IT 0. ACRES ....... ........... . ..... .... . ...... I✓9 ITT I s2E 47.1* ZI I of .1 so. R. 1996 0.11 ACRES so. r. 01, ACRES a." ACRES SET E VA2P* LPB;3p653\11. TRUE CORNER I 0/98 +1 (1) .... ... .. ... -14 -...-4-H .... DEAD END s IIET NAIL (7 V) VATS CA < . .......... .. . .. .... U: 0 z z 0w w < 0 < w ry M< 0 LLJ < LL- :D A i (Yl ( /17 lJ Q 0 LLJ V) cc W\ < jZ D C q/. cy . ......... ... a 00 cy) 4 4 R 5 2 A. VY54:17- AR: 1051-009"15 L. 39.23 L: RON: SET /2' PIPE CAP 20ALD RAW Or w-y 1=1- 53 -(71 LIM 20/9B) -3 L ......... & DISK 41 L865 SETIZ2PIPE & CAP U" / 98) ON Lr;3(7/2O/98) 01. STREET. ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- SURVEYOR'S NOTES: ------------ rk 0, E's 1,, Sel,, 11. 63 S-, R-9, -2 Cart. CA, of LECAL DESCRIPTION 5•e0.'rr hCREON PUT TITLE C-Ir, FNN... CW,I:1-ENTS Y-C-OP44 C-ly, nw4a fw-V k-P, es CNN;, C,-ty. rb- CERTIFY TO: WEST POW. -,,Nt�q 1. 1-I. . ... ... PI,w< A.".. .1 rwlu d-m "HA" Pb;. A-'. . , -D.. C-Ir. r­w.: -1-4. -.41 .. R� ..... rtN: CP-- L.- 0... W- IP,per r. C.1u. , F.7-* loll-11 P. CAR";. ftc:." MW C-4-12 IN -I'd DT C-ovo M4, -114 J.Il 13. it' 'JI-11 ,T.h�; F." J,m" 21. 1960 Inr, of;w Rno'g, TrW-W Sf lou"Al ...... 5 k 6 It 111Pck 2. be"fil. Lot 7 aI`& •J14 tm-1 '-,ga I, P.1 W p.q. 73. aW C-t W. E-j It . - x.. 0. &,N, el oid S-1- Z2 SPP,n;, I" E.""y 1, .1 N W,3'37* C Iw - u-t 9n of N.C. 361h SI-I -d -W.-d Ly bond CA, .1 w­j .­­. C.,­... CI,a, . U4, -.t. C�r, orb 6,N,, a d;,lo- .8 13.00 f,, C.-t FAt no. T-'. 1- "Wl" 1. 1. ..1*-, r.-I;c V.A;,.t 0 01, f fk�h ... I N.C. 1-1 .1 mvW ... la., .1 US 1 Ono NL d�g 1. Th. plot -.4 0,11165 • D. .11.709 (.4.V,Dj L-1.0 el N.C. c.- W W.r,Klbn of U.S, I -d N.C. 36 L SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATION: ON; pWAt L"osN- N-A .1, kN.1,6 I. (.Beta rlN Z-P (ELX)(ELS') vt101. Co-11, Pend "m 121110-0193 1. -1 Yoe, mop�l ". II I Ny .RPI t I., 'Ik~, S.,,* -4, 1,— m7 .1 - Oi-;- WI`4014 hw-t IN, r'W -swPd "�Q - WIN IIIDI;M W"Vm;C disl­e -:,-I- S -9. fete 71 1. NX .-d Al - --l-M (ED-), M-4. W.d. U.S. 51h P`Nf I- Co-1 .-d " "d It— -1 1. -h .1 Rd Lt 11 AND - L-1. v- IN -a 76.455 so -a ftct. w 1.763 -cs, w k,s. -1. ..c..-. •q. c 11 Ihl PkI 1-1Pd In pl On. C-fz - P-W- f .1.1- lAC.ODO C-6.1 M., S.-y. TAN TAN, IT j.;.Q1 h.d PRI, b, �T�/ICSIA PPNI SPS N, -*I" b' ,9 m. .1 25 t..i. -d Awl -11.4 W kW.I.d W�... .�i. -1 1 u a . C*.- S-y% I-L, 6 - Ih c- w i 011,ld,l =�!-4 kvN.. I. ."/. -9-d --cT,-PM. -t ,Men un4a• iN44%d - ..a I r 46 09-ed -4 -appP,' d IA PNa/. -91... -1 rMIN, W. Sxu L63L.3 "L:3 E id c- =241, �a, M, 7.1 V. r.., �a.d I- f;..d d /r, IN =w W= z Z Cl. d 25 I.A. RP At M w .rd -d I. VPW M .1 -d 'd P., Lb. Iron 5-;;;W 1�d Nppll• L529.53 IC 51 , " I - c, FW;d. 9- C0 w 0[: 0 =) co <, cl) LL 0 OF w V, coo, Z < z J C) 0 5 i < a) < c/) U- 0 00 Es p0 - < -i tN TRANSPORT ANALYSIS PROFESSIONALS, Inc. aterenee.: 8536 PAGE: 1 N-S Street: BISCAYNE BLVD FILE: BB233PM E-W Street: WE 33RD STREET Operator : DAB Movements by: All veh DATE: 9/01/98 ..........................................................................................................................I....... Time .......... S'bnd .... .......... W'bnd .... ......... N'bnd .... E'bnd .... Vehicle RTOR Begin RTOR RT THRU LT RTOR RT THRU lT RTOR RT THRU LT RTOR RT THRU LT Total Total ...............................................................................,................................................... 4:00 PM 0 5 237 12 0 3 0 4 1 5 374 5 2 4 3 2 657 3 4:15 0 6 267 3 1 1 1 2 0 6 388 5 2 0 0 2 6" 3 4:30 0 2 317 4 2 2 1 4 0 0 397 10 3 1 1 3 747 5 4:45 0 4 342 5 2 1 1 3 0 7 449 4 6 0 0 0 824 8 MR TOTAL 0 17 1163 24 5 7 3 13 1 18 1608 24 13 5 4 7 2912 19 5:00 PM 0 7 372 8 2 1 0 7 0 6 476 6 1 2 2 3 893 3 5:15 0 5 323 11 2 6 3 5 0 4 508 17 2 1 2 3 892 4 5:30 0 1 300 5 0 8 3 5 1 10 563 15 1 0 4 3 919 2 5:45 0 5 311 15 1 1 2 5 0 7 565 6 2 0 0 1 921 3 MR TOTAL 0 18 1306 39 5 16 8 22 1 27 2112 44 6 3 8 10 3625 12 .................................................................................................................................. 707AL 0 35 2469 63 10 23 11 35 2 45 3720 68 19 8 12 17 6537 31 PEAK PERIOD ANALYSIS FOR THE PERIOD: 4:00 PM - 6:00 PM DIRECTION START PEAK MR ........... VOLUMES ........... ...... PERCENTS ....... PEAK HOUR FACTOR RTOR Right Thru Left Total RTOR Right Thru Left -----.......................................................................................... S'bnd 4:30 PM 0.90 0 18 1354 28 0 1 97 2 W'bnd 5:00 PM 0.80 5 16 8 22 51 10 31 16 43 N'bnd 5:00 PM 0.93 1 27 2112 44 2184 0 1 97 2 E'bnd 4:30 PM 0.94 12 4 5 9 30 40 13 17 30 Entire intersection S'bnd 5:00 PM 0.68 0 18 1306 39 1363 0 1 96 3 W'bnd 0.80 5 16 8 22 51 10 31 16 43 N'bnd 0.93 1 27 2112 44 2184 0 1 97 2 E'bnd 0.84 6 3 8 10 27 22 11 30 37 S9- 307 i A TRANSPORT ANALYSIS PROFESSIONALS, Inc. Reference.: 8536 PAGE: 1 N-S Street: N.E. 2nd AV / FEDERAL HWY FILE: 3622FED E-Y Street: N.E. 36th STREET Operator : NFH / PCC Sum of the All Veh and Secondary DATE: 9/03/98 .................................................................................................................................. PEAK PERIOD ANALYSIS FOR THE PERIOD: 4:00 PM - 6:00 PM DIRECTIONSTART PEAK MR ........... VOLUMES ........... ...... PERCENTS ....... PEAK HOUR FACTOR RTOR Right Thru Left Total RTOR Right Thru Left ............................................................................................... Sind 4:30 PM 0.87 65 41 304 44 454 14 9 67 10 W'bnd 4:00 PM 0.91 2 110 402 2 516 0 21 78 0 N'bnd 4:45 PM 0.95 90 58 654 5 807 11 7 81 1 E'bnd 4:15 PM 0.92 3 46 333 116 498 1 9 67 23 Entire Intersection S'bnd 4:45 PM 0.84 52 45 291 49 437 12 10 67 11 W'bnd 0.92 3 101 400 3 507 1 20 79 1 N'bnd 0.95 90 58 654 5 807 11 7 81 1 E'bnd 0.91 5 45 349 95 494 1 9 71 19 I`N. E. 2nd_AV / FEDERAL HWY 11.c�YI( N W—l--E S ------------------- •- L 437 F 101 1'�N.E. • • a 95 1 349 494 45 .1 99-- 0017 1j- TRANSPORT ANALYSIS PROFESSIONALS, Inc. Reference.: 8536 PAGE: 1 N-S Street: N.E. 2nd AV / FEDERAL HWY FILE: 3622FED E-W Street: N.E. 36th STREET Operator : NFH / PCC Sum of the All Veh and Secondary DATE: 9/03/98 .................................................................................................................................. Time .......... S'bnd .... .......... W'bnd .... .......... N'bnd .... .......... E'bnd ,• Vehicle R70R Begin RTOR RT THRU LT RTOR RT THRU LT RTOR RT THRU LT RTOR RT THRU LT Total Total .................................................................................................................................. 4:00 PM 27 12 71 15 2 30 110 0 22 14 107 1 0 11 82 22 526 51 4:15 20 8 67 10 0 27 107 0 14 6 97 1 0 9 90 33 489 34 4:30 19 7 65 9 0 31 97 1 22 14 136 1 0 12 64 23 501 41 4:45 14 7 76 14 0 22 88 1 25 9 150 1 1 14 90 31 543 40 HR TOTAL 80 34 279 48 2 110 402 2 83 43 490 4 1 46 326 109 2059 166 5:00 PM 17 16 82 15 1 21 111 2 20 16 174 2 2 11 89 29 608 40 5:15 15 11 81 6 1 33 104 0 20 15 173 2 0 5 88 19 573 36 5:30 6 11 52 14 1 25 97 0 25 18 157 0 2 15 82 16 521 34 5:45 11 11 61 13 0 20 85 0 10 13 123 2 1 9 81 13 453 22 HR TOTAL 49 49 276 48 3 99 397 2 75 62 627 6 5 40 340 77 2155 132 ................................................................................................... ................. TOTAL 129 83 555 96 5 209 799 4 158 105 1117 10 6 86 666 186 4214 298 PEAK PERIOD ANALYSIS FOR THE PERIOD: 4:00 PM - 6:00 PM DIRECTION START PEAK HR ........... VOLUMES ........... ...... PERCENTS ....... PEAK HOUR FACTOR RTOR Right Thru Left Total RTOR Right Thru Left ................................................................ --..... S0bnd 4:30 PH 0.87 65 41 304 44 454 14 9 67 10 W'bnd 4:00 PM 0.91 2 110 402 2 516 0 21 78 0 N'bnd 4:45 PM 0.95 90 58 654 5 807 11 7 81 1 E'bnd 4:15 FM 0.92 3 46 333 116 498 1 9 67 23 Entire Intersection S'bnd 4:45 PM 0.84 52 45 291 49 437 12 10 67 11 W'bnd 0.92 3 101 400 3 507 1 20 79 1 N'bnd 0.95 90 58 654 5 807 11 7 81 1 E'bnd 0.91 5 45 349 95 494 1 9 71 19 09007 " APPENDIX P CAPACITY ANALYSES OF EXISTING CONDITIONS 09- 307 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4f 10-01-1998 Transport Analysis Professionals, Inc. Streets: (E-W) NE 36th Street (N-S) Biscayne Blvd Analyst: RPE/TAP File Name: US136EX.HC9 Area Type: Other 9-1-98 PM PEAK Comment: Existing Conditions Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- No. Lanes 1> 2 < 0 1> 1 < 0 1 2 1 1 2< 0 Volumes 205 382 82 338 117 473 151 1945 268 469 1228 254 Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vols 13 77 82 21 Lost Time 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 ------------------------- g p Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left * NB Left Thru * Thru Right * Right Peds Peds WB Left * * SB Left Thru * * Thru Right * * Right Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 16.OA 21.OA Green 17.OA 53.OP Yellow/AR 5.0 5.0 Yellow/AR 3.0 5.0 Cycle Length: 125 secs Phase combination order: #1 #2 #5 #6 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS ----- ----------- ----- ----- ----- --- ----- --- EB L 60 407 4.253 0.148 LTR 325 2194 2.035 0.148 WB L 432 1787 0.648 0.356 33.6 D LTR 544 1528 1.439 0.356 NB L 311 1787 0.540 0.604 0.8 A T 1654 3725 1.372 0.444 R 710 1599 0.292 0.444 7.9 B SB L 356 1787 1.531 0.604 TR 1615 3636 1.105 0.444 61.6 F Intersection Delay = * (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = (g/C)*(V/c) is greater than one. Calculation of D1 is infeasible. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 99- QDJ07 t,M HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4f 10-01-1998 Transport Analysis Professionals, Inc. Streets: (E-W) NE 36th Street (N-S) NE 2nd Avenue Analyst: RPE/TAP File Name: NE236EX.HC9 Area Type: Other 9-3-98 PM PEAK Comment: Existing Conditions --------------- ------------------------ Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R ---- L T R ---- ---- ---- L T R ---- ---- ---- No. Lanes ---- ---- ---- 1 2 < 0 ---- ---- 0 2 < 0 0 2 1 2 2 1 Volumes 95 349 50 400 104 654 148 49 291 97 Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vols 5 3 90 52 Lost Time 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 ------------------------- Signal O erations g p Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left * NB Left Thru * Thru Right * Right Peds Peds WB Left * * SB Left Thru * * Thru Right * * Right Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 16.OA 21.OA Green 17.OA 53.OP Yellow/AR 5.0 5.0 Yellow/AR 3.0 5.0 Cycle Length: 125 secs Phase combination order: #1 #2 #5 #6 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS ----- ----- ----- --- ----- --- ----- ----------- EB L 60 407 1.728 0.148 TR 547 3697 0.833 0.148 43.3 E WB TR 1299 3648 0.440 0.356 23.4 C 23.4 C NB T 1654 3725 0.436 0.444 8.6 B 8.5 B R 710 1599 0.086 0.444 7.1 B SB L 761 3574 0.079 0.604 0.0 A 6.6 B T 1654 3725 0.219 0.444 7.6 B R 710 1599 0.075 0.444 7.1 B Intersection Delay = * (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = (g/C)*(V/c) is greater than ----------------------------------------------------------------------- one. Calculation of D1 is infeasible. R 99- '307 1 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4f 09-28-1998 Transport Analysis Professionals, Inc. cxx�axxxx--x----�--+xax=xxx==xax-xxxaxxxxxxxxxx=xxxxxxxxxxc---x�-= Streets: (E-W) NE 38th Street (N-S) Biscayne Blvd Analyst: RPE/TAP File Name: US138EX.HC9 Area Type: Other 9-1-98 PM PEAK Comment: Sxisting Conditions - - Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- - ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- No. Lanes 0 0 0 1 > 1 1 1 2 < 0 1 2 < 0 Volumes 458 100 495 29 1542 308 372 1244 42 Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vols 152 20 2 Lost Time 12.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- - Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 - EB Left NB Left Thru Thru = Right Right Peds Peds WB Left * SB Left Thru * Thru Right * Right Peds Peds = NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 22.OA Green 58.OA 31.OP =_ Yellow/AR 4.0 Yellow/AR 5.0 5.0 Cycle Length: 125 secs Phase combination order: #1 #5 #6 ------------- --------------------------------------------------------•-- Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: - - Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS ----- ----------- ----- ----- ----- --- ----- --- WB L 336 1787 1.548 0.188 — LT 354 1881 0.322 0.188 33.4 D - R 761 1599 0.512 0.476 17.5 C NB L ill 229 0.279 0.484 5.7 B = TR 1760 3637 1.161 0.484 SB L 575 1787 0.696 0.772 1.3 A 0.3 A TR 2863 3708 0.507 0.772 0.1 A Intersection Delay = * (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = _ (g/C)*(V/c) is greater than one. Calculation of D1 is infeasible. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 99- 0307 NIP HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1f NE536EXS.HCO Page 1 Transport Analysis Professionals, Inc. 8701 SW 137th Avenue Suite 210 Miami, FL 33183-4498 Ph: (305) 385-0777 Streets: (N-S) -NE 5th Avenue (E-W) NE 36th Street Major Street Direction.... NS Length of Time Analyzed... 15 (min) Analyst.. .......... TAP/RPE Date of Analysis.......... 9/2/98 Other Information ......... Existinq Conditions On South Side Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection ----------------- ----------------------------- Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound L T R L T R L T R__J L T R No. Lanes Stop/Yield Volumes PHF Grade MCI ($) SU/RVIs (�) CVIs (%) PCEIs ------------ 0 > 1 < 0 N 9 0 69 .89 .89 .89 0 1.10 --------------- 0 0 0 ---------------- N 0 2 < 0 1039 6 .9 .9 0 1.10 1.10 ---------------- Adjustment Factors 0 > 1 0 0 43 .85 .85 0 1.10 1.10 --------------- Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) ------------------------------------------------------------------ Left Turn Major Road 5.00 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.00 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 6.50 3.40 99-0'7 W HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1f NE53SEXS.HCO Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection -------------------------------------------------------- Step 1: RT from Minor Street -------------------------------------------------------- WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 0 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1385 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1385 Prob. of Queue -Free State: - 0.99 ------------------ -------------------------------------- -. Step 2: LT from Major Street SB NB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 0 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1714 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1714 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.99 - TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 Major LT Shared Lane Prob. - of Queue -Free State: 0.99 Step 3: TH from Minor Street WB EB - -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 49 88 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1028 981 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.99 0.99 -- Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1021 974 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.95 0.00 - Step 4: LT from Minor Street —_ WB EB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 630 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 457 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0.00 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.00 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.00 - Movement Capacity: (pcph) _-------------------------------------------------------- 0 �9- 30'7 'a. A lu. HCS: Unsignaiized Intersections Release 2.1f NE536EXS.HCO Page 3 Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph)(sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh) -------- ------ ------ -------------------- -------------- EB T 1269 974 > 156.7 Eg R 8 1385 > 976 156.7 45.3 F WB L 0 0> 0 * * F WB T 56 1021 > NB L 11 1714 2.1 0.0 A 0.2 Intersection Delay - * * The calculated value was greater than 999.9. 99- 307 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1f NE536EXN.HC0 Page 1 Transport Analysis Professionals, Inc. 8701 SW 137th Avenue Suite 210 Miami, FL 33183-4498 Ph: (305) 385-0777 Streets: (N-S)NE 5th Avenue (E-W) NE 36th Street Major Street Direction.... NS Length of Time Analyzed... 15 (min) Analyst.. .......... TAP/RPE Date of Analysis.......... 9/2/98 Other Information....... .Existing Conditions On North Side Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection --------------------------- - Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes Stop/Yield Volumes PHF Grade MC's (�) SU/RV's (�) CV's (`�) PCE's ------------ 0 0 0 --------------- N 0 > 1 < 0 N 1 0 1 .25 .25 .25 0 1.10 ---------------- 0 > 1 0 4 1039 .9 .9 0 1.10 1.10 ---------------- Adjustment Factors 0 1 < 0 43 1 .85 .85 0 1.10 1.10 --------------- Vehicle critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) ------------------------------------------------------------------ Left Turn Major Road 5.00 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.00 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 6.50 3.40 t I i c9_ 30"7' I 1�_ ■ HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1f NE536EXN.HCO Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection -------------------------------------------------------- Step 1: RT from Minor Street WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 0 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1385 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1385 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 1.00 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 2: LT from Major Street SB NB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 0 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1714 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1714 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 1.00 TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 Major LT Shared Lane Prob. of Queue -Free State: 1.00 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 3: TH from Minor Street WB EB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 8 6 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1080 1083 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1077 1080 Prob. of Queue -Free State: -------------------------------------------------------- 0.95 0.00 Step 4: LT from Minor Street WB EB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 32 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1015 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0.95 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.96 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.96 Movement Capacity: (pcph) -------------------------------------------------------- 972 9 9 -- 3,07 s HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1f NE536EXN.HCO Page 3 aa-__-a___sasaxr-=sas=x�_ a=xssxxscm:ssaas - Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement -------- (pcph) ------ (pcph) (pcph)(sec/veh) (veh) ------ -------------------- ----- (sec/veh) --------- £B L 4 972 > 1080 101.7 34.9 F - EB T 1269 1080 > 101.7 - WB T 56 1077 > 3.5 WB R 1 1385 > 1081 3.5 0.0 A SB L 4 1714 2.1 0.0 A 1.1 - Intersection Delay = 97.6 sec/veh 99- 307 W cI 2 %.- HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4f 10-02-1998 Transport Analysis Professionals, Inc. Streets: (E-W) HE 36th Street (N-S) Biscayne Blvd Analyst: RPE/TAP File. Name: US136MT.HC9 Area Type: Other 9-1-98 PM PEAK Comment: Existing Conditions W/Modified Timing Eastbound Westbound Northbound 'Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- No. Lanes 1 > 2 < 0 1 > 1 < 0 1 2 1 1 2 < 0 Volumes 205 382 82 338 117 473 151 1945 268 469 1228 254 Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vols 13 77 82 21 Lost Time 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 --------------------------------------------------------- --------------- Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left * NB Left Thru * Thru Right * Right Peds Peds WB Left * * SB Left Thru * * Thru Right * * Right Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 12.OA 12.OA Green 8.OA 45.OP Yellow/AR 5.0 5.0 Yellow/AR 3.0 5.0 Cycle Length: 95 secs Phase combination order: #1 #2 #5 #6 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Ap proach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS ----- ----------- ----- ----- ----- --- ----- --- EB L 79 519 3.497 0.153 LTR 561 3676 1.139 0.153 104.0 F WB L 399 1787 1.058 0.332 69.5 F 94.3 F LTR 552 1663 1.162 0.332 110.6 F NB L 239 1787 0.703 0.616 3.2 A T 1863 3725 1.218 0.500 R 800 1599 0.259 0.500 3.5 A SB L 280 1787 1.946 0.616 TR 1818 3636 0.981 0.500 14.2 B Intersection Delay = * (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = (g/C)*(V/c) is greater than one. Calculation of D1 is infeasible. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 99- 307 r i HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUHMARY Version 2.4f 10-02-1998 Transport Analysis Professionals, Inc. ¢rs+a+�sc�as=ccs a���a=s-�sr���ssaessasa•��--sue•--.=a�=ssasaaa:ar�-----a Streets: (E-W) NE 36th Street (N-S) NE 2nd Avenue Analyst: RPE/TAP File Name: NE236MT.HC9 Area Type: Other 9-3-98 PM PEAK Comment: Existing Conditions W/Modified Timing _ ~Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R ---- ---- L T R ---- ---- ---- L T R ---- ---- ---- No. Lanes ---- ---- ---- 1 2 < 0 ---- 0 2 < 0 0 2 1 2 2 1 Volumes 95 349 50 400 104 654 148 49 291 97 Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vols 5 3 90 52 Lost Time 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 ----------------------------- Signal Operations Phase Combination 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left * NB Left Thru * Thru Right * Right Peds Peds WB Left * * SB Left Thru * * Thru Right * * Right Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 24.OA 21.OA Green 12.OA 40.OP Yellow/AR 5.0 5.0 Yellow/AR 3.0 5.0 Cycle Length: 115 secs Phase combination order: #1 #2 #5 #6 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS ----- ----- ----- --- ----- --- ----- ----------- EB L 110 478 0.945 0.230 66.0 F 36.5 D TR 852 3697 0.535 0.230 29.8 D WB TR 1666 3648 0.343 0.457 15.3 C 15.3 C NB T 1377 3725 0.524 0.370 13.3 B 13.1 B R 591 1599 0.103 0.370 11.0 B SB L 684 3574 0.088 0.500 3.9 A 10.7 B T 1377 3725 0.264 0.370 11.7 B R 591 1599 0.090 0.370 10.9 B Intersection Delay = 18.6 sec/veh Intersection LOS = C Lost Time/Cycle, L = 7.5 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.393 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 99- 30"7 t M %. HCH: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY version 2.4f 10-02-1998 Transport Analysis Professionals, Inc. _______--------------- __________________ _________ Streets: (E-W) NE 33rd Street (N-S) Biscayne Blvd Analyst: RPE/TA.P File Name: US133MT.HC9 Area Type: Other 9-1-98 PM PEAK Comment: Existing Conditions W/Modified Timing __________________________________________ Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- No. Lanes 0 > 1 < 0 0 > 1 < 0 0 > 3 < 0 1 2 < 0 volumes 10 8 9 22 8 21 44 2112 28 39 1306 18 Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vols 6 5 1 0 Lost Time 12.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left * NB Left Thru * Thru Right * Right Peds Peds WB Left * SB Left Thru * Thru Right * Right Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 30.OA Green 76.OP Yellow/AR 4.0 Yellow/AR 5.0 Cycle Length: 115 secs Phase combination order: #1 #5 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS ----- ----------- ----- ----- ----- --- ----- --- EB LTR 425 1551 0.061 0.274 23.4 C 23.4 C WB LTR 418 1525 0.136 0.274 23.9 C 23.9 C NB DfL 124 181 0.380 0.683 0.5 A 3.8 A TR 2538 3718 0.952 0.683 3.9 A SB L 124 181 0.356 0.683 0.4 A 0.2 A TR 2538 3718 0.622 0.683 0.2 A Intersection Delay = 2.8 sec/veh Intersection LOS = A Lost Time/Cycle, L = 5.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.718 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 9 - 307 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4f 10-02-1998 Transport Analysis Professionals, Inc. aasam�esaaaaaaae�saaaea-�����aaa=aaaaas---aaa t=aaarssmese�--��--�^sa=ammaaasaa Streets: (E-W) NE 38th Street (N-S) Biscayne Blvd Analyst: RPE/TAP File Name: US138MT.HC9 Area Type: Other 9-1-98 PM PEAK Comment: Existing Conditions W/Modified Timing ^_________-___-______-_-_-- Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- No. Lanes 0 0 0 1 > 1 1 1 2 < 0 1 2 < 0 Volumes 458 100 495 29 1542 308 372 1244 42 Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vols 152 20 2 Lost Time 12.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left NB Left Thru Thru Right Right Peds Peds WB Left * SB Left Thru * Thru Right * Right Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 23.OA Green 46.OA 12.OP Yellow/AR 4.0 Yellow/AR 5.0 5.0 Cycle Length: 95 secs Phase combination order: #1 #5 #6 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS ----- ----------- ----- ----- ----- --- ----- --- WB L 461 1787 1.128 0.258 96.8 F 57.4 E LT 485 1881 0.235 0.258 21.2 C R 699 1599 0.558 0.437 15.5 C NB L 117 229 0.265 0.511 3.2 A TR 1857 3637 1.101 0.511 SB L 399 1787 1.003 0.689 25.1 D 5.5 B TR 2557 3708 0.567 0.689 0.1 A Intersection Delay = * (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = (g/C)*(V/c) is greater than one. Calculation of D1 is infeasible. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 99- 307 ". 71 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4f 10-01-1998 Transport Analysis Professionals, Inc. - _- Streets: (E-W) NE 33rd Street (N-S) Biscayne Blvd i Analyst: RPE/TAP File Name: US133EX.HC9 Area Type: Other 9-1-98 PM PEAK Comment: Existing Conditions - ___===========_=====---========================---=----====---- --- ===_---- Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R - ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- - No. Lanes 0 > 1 < 0 0 > 1 < 0 0 > 3 < 0 1 2 < 0 Volumes 10 8 9 22 8 21 44 2112 28 39 1306 18 Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vols 6 5 1 0 Lost Time 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 -------------------------- g P Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left * NB Left * - Thru * Thru Right * Right * _ Peds Peds WB Left * SB Left * - Thru * Thru Right * Right Peds Peds NB Right EB Right - SB WB Right Green �ght g 13.OA Green 93.OP Yellow/AR 4.0 Yellow/AR 5.0 Cycle Length: 115 secs Phase combination order: #1 #5 = ----------------------------------------------------------------------- - Intersection Performance Summary _ Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS ----- ----------- ----- -- --- ----- --- ----- --- _ EB LTR 192 1523 0.135 0.126 34.0 D 34.0 D WB LTR 191 1511 0.299 0.126 34.8 D 34.8 D NB DfL 150 181 0.313 0.830 0.2 A 0.5 A TR 3088 3718 0.782 0.830 0.5 A =_ SB L 150 181 0.293 0.830 0.2 A 0.1 A TR 3088 3718 0.511 0.830 0.1 A Intersection Delay = 1.0 sec/veh Intersection LOS = A Lost Time/Cycle, L = 5.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.718 99- J®7 Rt r APPENDIX C CAPACITY ANALYSES OF THREE-YEAR BACKGROUND TRAFFIC GROWTH ��- 307 %I- I HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4f 10-03-1998 Transport Analysis Professionals, Inc. a==2zzwW= Streets: (E-W) NE 33rd Street (N-S) Biscayne Blvd Analyst: RPE/TAP File Name: US133BT.HC9 Area Type: Other 9-1-98 PM PEAK Comment: Existing Conditions W/Modified Timing & Background Traffic --__-_--_______-_-_-____-_ Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- No. Lanes 0 > 1 < 0 0 > 1 < 0 0 > 3 < 0 1 2 < 0 Volumes 11 9 10 23 9 22 47 2241 30 41 1386 19 Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vols 6 5 1 0 Lost Time 12.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Signal operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left * NB Left Thru * Thru Right * Right Peds Peds WB Left * SB Left Thru * Thru Right * Right Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 30.OA Green 76.OP Yellow/AR 4.0 Yellow/AR 5.0 Cycle Length: 115 secs Phase combination order: #1 #5 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS -- --- ----------- -- --- ----- ----- --- ----- --- EB LTR 422 1541 0.069 0.274 23.5 C 23.5 C WB LTR 416 1519 0.147 0.274 24.0 C 24.0 C NB DfL 123 181 0.413 0.683 0.7 A 11.6 B TR 2538 3718 1.010 0.683 11.8 B SB L 123 181 0.381 0.683 0.5 A 0.2 A TR 2538 3718 0.661 0.683 0.2 A Intersection Delay = 7.4 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B Lost Time/Cycle, L = 5.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.763 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 1r 9 - i.! U 1 APPENDIX E ITE TRIP GENERATION 99-- 307 Biscayne Tower Summary of Trip Generation Calculation For 358 Dwelling Units of High -Rise Apartment December 29, 1998 Average Standard Adjustment Driveway Rate Deviation Factor Volume Avg. Weekday 2-Way Volume 4.20 2.32 1.00 1504 7-9 AM Peak Hour Enter 0.08 0.00 1.00 29 7-9 AM Peak Hour Exit 0.23 0.00 1.00 82 7-9 AM Peak Hour Total 0.30 0.55 1.00 107 4-6 PM Peak Hour Enter 0.21 0.00 1.00 75 4-6 PM Peak Hour Exit 0.14 0.00 1.00 50 4-6 PM Peak Hour Total 0.35 0.59 1.00 125 Saturday 2-Way Volume 4.98 2.36 1.00 1783 Saturday Peak Hour Enter 0.23 0.00 1.00 82 Saturday Peak Hour Exit 0.17 0.00 1.00 61 Saturday Peak Hour Total 0.40 0.63 1.00 143 Note: A zero indicates no data available. Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation, 6th Edition, 1997. TRIP GENERATION BY MICROTRANS Iv- 3J-j0 - _ r HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4f 10-03-1998 Transport Analysis Professionals, Inc. atssxc�n=��--•.•=e=a=� �asea:=sa�zas=�=�=a=a==�.=man=a=�asasa aa¢aa�asaa Streets: (E-W) NE 36th Street (N-S) Biscayne Blvd Analyst: RPE/TAP File Name: US136BT.HC9 Area Type: Other 9-1-98 PM PEAK Comment: Existing Conditions W/Modified Timing & Background Traffic Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- No. Lanes 1> 2 < 0 1> 1 < 0 1 2 1 1 2< 0 Volumes 218 405 87 359 124 502 160 2064 284 498 1303 270 Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vols 13 77 82 21 Lost Time 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left * NB Left Thru * Thru Right * Right Peds Peds WB Left * * SB Left Thru * * Thru Right * * Right Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 12.OA 12.OA Green 8.0A 45.OP Yellow/AR 5.0 5.0 Yellow/AR 3.0 5.0 Cycle Length: 95 secs Phase combination order: #1 #2 #5 #6 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS ----- ----------- ----- ----- ----- --- ----- --- EB L 79 519 3.724 0.153 LTR 561 3675 1.210 0.153 WB L 399 1787 1.125 0.332 98.4 F LTR 551 1663 1.244 0.332 NB L 239 1787 0.745 0.616 4.3 A T 1863 3725 1.293 0.500 R 800 1599 0.281 0.500 3.5 A SB L 280 1787 2.068 0.616 TR 1818 3636 1.042 0.500 29.0 D Intersection Delay = * (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = (g/C)*(V/c) is greater than one. Calculation of D1 is infeasible. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 99- 30"7 t�- i HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4f 10-03-1998 Transport Analysis Professionals, Inc. _ xsa:aaascas aaxsxxx=x==cxxcsx=xxs----xxxxxs=sxss�sxcxx�xxx Streets: (E-W) HE 38th Street (N-S) Biscayne Blvd Analyst: RPE/TAP File Name: US138BT.HC9 Area Type: Other 9-1-98 PM PEAK Comment: Existing Conditions W/Modified Timing & Background Traffic =--------------------------------------------------------------------- - Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- No. Lanes 0 0 0 1 > 1 1 1 2 < 0 1 2 < 0 Volumes 486 106 525 31 1636 327 395 1320 45 Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vols 152 20 2 Lost Time 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 ------------------------- 9 p Signal O erations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left NB Left Thru Thru Right Right Peds Peds WB Left * SB Left —= Thru * Thru Right * Right Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 23.OA Green 46.OA 12.OP Yellow/AR 4.0 Yellow/AR 5.0 5.0 Cycle Length: 95 secs Phase combination order: #1 #5 #6 --------------------------- Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS ----- ----------- ----- ----- ----- --- ----- --- WB L 461 1787 1.198 0.258 LT 485 1881 0.247 0.258 21.3 C R 699 1599 0.607 0.437 16.1 C NB L 117 229 0.282 0.511 3.3 A TR 1857 3637 1.169 0.511 SB L 437 1787 0.973 0.689 17.8 C 4.0 A TR 2557 3708 0.602 0.689 0.1 A Intersection Delay = * (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = (g/C)*(V/c) is greater than one. Calculation of D1 is infeasible. —----------------------------------------------------------------------- 9 9 - 307 BISCAYNE BAY TOWER OTHER CONSIDERATIONS 99- � 07 HCH: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4f 10-03-1998 Transport Analysis Professionals, Inc. Streets: (E-W) NE 36th Street (N-S) NE 2nd Avenue Analyst: RPE/TAP File Name: NE236BT.HC9 ; Area Type: Other 9-3-98 PM PEAK Comment: Existing Conditions W/Modified Timing & Backround Traffic ------------------ Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R ---- ---- ---- L T R ---- ---- ---- L T R ---- ---- ---- L T R No. Lanes 1 2< 0 0 2< 0 0 2 1 ---- ---- ---- 2 2 1 Volumes 101 370 53 425 111 694 157 52 309 103 Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vols 5 3 90 52 Lost Time ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 2.50 2.50 2.501 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left * NB Left Thru * Thru Right * Right Peds Peds WB Left * * SB Left Thru * * Thru Right * * Right Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 27.OA 21.OA Green 12.OA 37.OP Yellow/AR 5.0 5.0 Yellow/AR 3.0 5.0 Cycle Length: 115 secs Phase ----------------------------------------------------------------------- combination order: #1 #2 #5 #6 Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow ----- ----------- Ratio Ratio Delay LO-S Delay LOS ----- EB L 118 460 ----- ----- --- ----- --- 0.940 0.257 62.3 F 34.4 D TR 948 3697 0.509 0.257 28.0 D WB TR 1760 3648 0.346 0.483 14.1 B 14.1 B NB T 1280 3725 0.600 0.343 15.7 C 15.5 C R 549 1599 0.127 0.343 12.8 B SB L 707 3574 0.091 0.474 5.3 B 12.5 B T 1280 3725 0.302 0.343 13.7 B R 549 1599 0.111 0.343 12.8 B Intersection Delay = 19.0 sec/veh Intersection LOS = C Lost Time/Cycle, L = 7.5 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.418 99- 307 r, 1:_ HCS: Unsignalized intersections Release 2.1f NE536BTN.HCO Page 1 a:asscasaea:ssss:a:ats:asssess-�s==cs�asxaaess=ss=ssmazesmasarxasetssaammm�sassa Transport Analysis Professionals, Inc. 8701 SW 137th Avenue Suite 210 Miami, FL 33183-4498 Ph: (305) 385-0777 Streets: (N-S) NE 5th Avenue (E-W) NE 36th Street Major Street Direction.... NS Length of Time Analyzed... 15 (min) Analyst. ......... TAP/RPE Date of Analysis.......... 9/2/98 Other Information......... Existing Conditions On North Side & B'G round Traffic Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection ------------------------------------------------------------ Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound -L- T R L T R I L T R I L T R ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- No. Lanes Stop/Yield Volumes PHF Grade MC's (�) SU/RV's (�) CV's (�) PCE's ------------ 0 0 0 --------------- N 0 > 1 < 0 N 1 0 1 .25 .25 .25 0 1.10 ---------------- 0 > 1 0 4 1103 .9 .9 0 1.10 1.10 ---------------- Adjustment Factors 0 1 < 0 47 1 .85 .85 0 1.10 1.10 --------------- Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver ------------------------------------------------ Gap (tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road ------------------ 5.00 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.00 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 6.50 3.40 99— 307 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1f NE536BTN.HCO Page 2 aavasaxas:a:xs�-^�xcss�-saxcx========axx==x=x=s=x=cacaaeasssaa=asaa==xsaxa= Worksheet for TWSC Intersection -------------------------------------------------------- Step 1: RT from Minor Street WB EB -------------------------------------------------------- - Conflicting Flows: (vph) 0 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1385 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1385 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 1.00 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 2: LT from Major Street - SB NB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 0 _ Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1714 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1714 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 1.00 TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 Major LT Shared Lane Prob. = of Queue -Free State: _ 1.00 -------------------------------------------------------- _ Step 3: TH from Minor Street WB EB -------------------------------------------------------- _. Conflicting Flows: (vph) 8 6 - Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1080 1083 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1077 1080 Prob. of Queue -Free State: -------------------------------------------------------- 0.94 0.00 —Step 4: LT from Minor Street WB EB ------------- ------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 34. Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1012 — Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0.94 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.96 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.95 — Movement Capacity: (pcph) —-------------------------------------------------------- 966 99— 3107 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1f NE536BTN.HCO Page 3 axaaaa aasaaaaaaa=a=a=c==xe=c__=__=c==�_aaa=a =-.tee=—ca--ease-c Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph)(sec/veh) ------ ------------- (veh) ------- ----- (sec/veh) --------- -------- EB L ------ 4 966 > 1080 131.7 43.0 F EB T 1349 1080 > 131.7 WB T 61 1077 > 3.5 WB R 1 1385 > 1081 3.5 0.0 A SB L 4 1714 2.1 0.0 A 1.1 Intersection Delay = 126.2 sac/veh 99— A.- 0 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1f NE536BTS.HCO Page 1 �asa¢a=¢�aaa�=aa a=a=aa¢c-=aa=s�aa¢a �-¢=a=a¢¢s=a¢aaa¢a¢a¢asa¢=a Transport Analysis Professionals, Inc. 8701 SW 137th Avenue Suite 210 Miami, FL 33183-4498 Ph: (305) 385-0777 Streets: (N-S) NE 5th Avenue (E-W) NE 36th Street Major Street Direction.... NS Length of Time Analyzed... 15 (min) Analyst.. .......... TAP/RPE Date of Analysis.......... 9/2/98 Other Information......... Existing Conditions On South Side & BIG round Traffic Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes Stop/Yield Volumes PHF Grade MC's (%) SU/RV's (%) CV's (�) PCE's ------------ 0 > 1 < 0 N 10 0 73 .89 .89 .89 0 1.10 --------------- 0 0 0 ---------------- N 0 2 < 0 1103 6 .9 .9 0 1.10 1.10 ---------------- 0 > 1 0 0 47 .85 .85 0 1.10 1.10 --------------- Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) ------------------------------------------------------------------ Left Turn Mayor Road 5.00 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.00 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 6.50 3.40 99- 30"7 M 1, HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1f NE536BTS.HCO Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection -------------------------------------------------------- Step 1: RT from Minor Street WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 0 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1385 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1385 Prob. of Queue -Free State: -------------------------------------------------------- 0.99 Step 2: LT from Major Street SB NB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 0 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1714 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1714 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.99 TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 Major LT Shared Lane Prob. of Queue -Free State: --------------------------------------------------------- 0.99 Step 3: TH from Minor Street ---------------------------- WB EB ---------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 52 93 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1024 975 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.99 0.99 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1016 968 Prob. of Queue -Free State: -------------------------------------------------------- 0.94 0.00 Step 4: LT from Minor Street -------------------------------------------------------- WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 668 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 435 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0.00 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.00 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.00 Movement Capacity: (pcph) -------------------------------------------------------- 0 S 9 - 16,07 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1g NE536BTS.HCO Page 3 sasa�ma�=scar^Ana===sc��a=o===o-o�=ao===aoa....�==�a��oaa=eac=e�af�e:a. Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) ------ (pcph) (pcph)(sec/veh) ------ ------------- (veh) ------- ----- (sec/veh) --------- -------- EB T 1349 968 > 195.4 EB R 8 1385 > 970 195.4 54.7 F WB L 0 0> 0 * * F WB T 61 1016 > NB L 12 1714 2.1 0.0 A 0.3 Intersection Delay - * * The calculated value was greater than 999.9. `w 99- 30"7 CAPACITY ANALYSES OF • sBACKGROUND r THE BISCAYNE BAY TOWER'SV 99- 307 El HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4f 10-07-1998 Transport Analysis Professionals, Inc. Streets: (E-W) NE 36th Street (N-S) NE 2nd Avenue Analyst: RPE/TAP File Name: NE236ST.HC9 Area Type: Other 9-3-98 PM PEAK Comment: Existing Conditions W/Modified Timing, Backround & Site Traffic Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- No. Lanes 1 2 < 0 0 2 < 0 0 2 1 2 2 1 _ Volumes 101 388 53 429 111 694 157 52 309 103 Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vols 5 3 90 52 Lost Time 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left * NB Left Thru * Thru Right * Right Peds Peds WB Left * * SB Left Thru * * Thru Right * * Right Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 27.OA 21.OA Green 12.OA 37.OP Yellow/AR 5.0 5.0 Yellow/AR 3.0 5.0 Cycle Length: 115 secs Phase combination order: #1 #2 #5 #6 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS - - EB L 116 454 0.953 0.257 65.5 F 34.9 D TR 949 3700 0.530 0.257 28.2 D WB TR 1761 3648 0.348 0.483 14.1 B 14.1 B _ NB T 1280 3725 0.600 0.343 15.7 C 15.5 C R 549 1599 0.127 0.343 12.8 B _= SB L 707 3574 0.091 0.474 5.3 B 12.5 B T 1280 3725 0.302 0.343 13.7 B R 549 1599 0.111 0.343 12.8 B Intersection Delay = 19.2 sec/veh Intersection LOS = C Lost Time/Cycle, L = 7.5 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.419 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 29-6-1 307 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4f 10-14-1998 Transport Analysis Professionals, Inc. aaaaasascaaas-��-aaaa=a===a=aa=====a=asc=n�a===asca==aa=acaa=a=�==s-=a Streets: (E-W) NE 33rd Street (N-S) Biscayne Blvd Analyst: RPE/TAP File Name: US133ST.HC9 Area Type: Other 9-1-98 PM PEAK Comment: Existing Conditions W/Modified Timing, Background Site Traffic ______-_____ __-___--____________-______- - - Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R ---- ---- ---- L T R ---- ---- ---- L T R ---- ---- ---- L T R No. Lanes 0 > 1 < 0 0 > 1 < 0 0 > 3 < 0 ---- ---- ---- 1 2 < 0 Volumes 11 9 10 23 9 22 47 2273 30 41 1399 19 Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vols 6 5 1 0 Lost Time 12.50 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left * NB Left Thru * Thru Right * Right Peds Peds WB Left * SB Left Thru * Thru Right * Right Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 30.OA Green 76.OP Yellow/AR 4.0 Yellow/AR 5.0 Cycle Length: 115 secs Phase ----------------------------------------------------------------------- combination order: #1 #5 Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow ----- ----------- Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS ----- ----- EB L•TR 422 1541 ----- -=- ----- --- 0.069 0.274 23.5 C 23.5 C WB LTR 416 1519 0.147 0.274 24.0 C 24.0 C NB DfL 123 181 0.413 0.683 0.7 A 15.2 C TR 2538 3718 1.024 0.683 15.5 C SB L 123 181 0.381 0.683 0.5 A 0.2 A TR 2538 3718 0.667 0.683 0.2 A Intersection Delay = 9.6 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B Lost Time/Cycle, L = 5.0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.773 99- '307 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4f 10-14-1998 Transport Analysis Professionals, Inc. Streets: (E-W) NE 38th Street (N-S) Biscayne Blvd Analyst: RPE/TAP File Name: US138ST.HC9 Area Type: Other 9-1-98 PM PEAK Comment: Existing Conditions W/Modified Timing, Background Site Traffic Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R ---- ---- ---- L T R ---- ---- ---- L T R ---- ---- ---- No. Lanes ---- ---- ---- 0 0 0 1 > 1 1 1 2 < 0 1 2 < 0 Volumes 546 106 525 31 1654 327 395 1342 45 Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vols 152 20 2 Lost Time 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left NB Left Thru Thru Right Right Peds Peds WB Left * SB Left Thru * Thru Right * Right Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 26.OA Green 46.OA 11.0P Yellow/AR 4.0 Yellow/AR 4.0 4.0 Cycle Length: 95 secs Phase combination order: O'1 Pu5 A6 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat V/c g/C Approach: Mvmts ----- Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS ----------- ----- ----- ----- --- ----- --- WB L 517 1787 1.198 0.289 LT 545 1881 0.220 0.289 19.5 C R 715 1599 0.593 0.447 15.5 C NB L 115 229 0.288 0.500 3.7 A TR 1819 3638 1.205 0.500 SB L 397 1787 1.071 0.658 46.3 E 10.1 B TR 2440 3708 0.641 0.658 0.2 A Intersection Delay = * (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = (g/C)*(V/c) ----------------------------------------------------------------------- is greater than one. Calculation of D1 is infeasible. 9 9 - 307 I t4. HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4f 10-14--1998 Transport Analysis Professionals, Inc. Streets: (E-W) NE 36th Street (N-S) Biscayne Blvd Analyst: RPE/TAP File Name: US136ST.HC9 Area Type: Other 9-1-98 PM PEAK Comment: Existing Conditions W/Modified Timing, Background Site Traffic ------------------ _____________ Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- No. Lanes 1> 2 < 0 1> 1 < 0 1 2 1 1 2< 0 Volumes 218 423 87 372 128 520 160 2064 316 580 1303 270 Lane W (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vols 13 77 82 21 Lost Time 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left * NB Left Thru * Thru Right * Right Peds Peds WB Left * * SB Left Thru * * Thru Right * * Right Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 12.OA 12.OA Green 8.OA 45.OP Yellow/AR 5.0 5.0 Yellow/AR 3.0 5.0 Cycle Length: 95 secs Phase combination order: #1 #2 #5 #6 ------------------------------ ----------------------------------------- Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS ----- ----------- ----- ----- ----- --- ----- --- EB L 79 519 3.724 0.153 LTR 561 3678 1.257 0.153 WB L 399 1787 1.165 0.332 119.8 F LTR 551 1662 1.295 0.332 NB L 239 1787 0.745 0.616 4.3 A T 1863 3725 1.293 0.500 R 800 1599 0.325 0.500 3.6 A SB L 280 1787 2.407 0.616 TR 1818 3636 1.042 0.500 29.0 D Intersection Delay = * (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = (g/C)*(V/c) is greater than one. Calculation of D1 is infeasible. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 99-- 307 71 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1f NE536STS.HCO Page 1 Transport Analysis Professionals, Inc. 8701 SW 137th Avenue Suite 210 Miami, FL 33183-4498 Ph: (305) 385-0777 Streets: (N-S)NE 5th Avenue (E-W) NE 36th Street Major Street Direction.... NS Length of Time Analyzed... 15 (min) Analyst.. .......... TAP/RPE Date of Analysis.......... 9/2/98 Other Information......... Existing Conditions On South Side & B'G round Traffic & Site Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes Stop/Yield Volumes PHF Grade MC's (%) SU/RV's (%) CV's (%) PCE's ------------ 0 > 1 < 0 N 10 0 73 .89 .89 .89 0 1.10 0 0 0 ---------------- N 0 2 < 0 1155 6 .9 .9 0 1.10 1.10 ---------------- Adjustment Factors 0 > 1 0 0 82 .85 .85 0 1.10 1.10 --------------- Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) ------------------------------------------------------------------ Left Turn Major Road 5.00 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.00 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 6.50 3.40 09- 307 I 2 M HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1f NE536STS.HCO Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection -------------------------------------------------------- Step 1: RT from Minor Street WB ____EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 0 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1385 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1385 Prob. of Queue -Free State: ------------------------- 0.99 ------------------------------ step 2: LT from Major Street SB NB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 0 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1714 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1714 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.99 TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 Major LT Shared Lane Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.99 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 3: TH from Minor Street WB EB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 52 93 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1024 975 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.99 0.99 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1016 968 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.90 0.00 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 4: LT from Minor Street WB EB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 697 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 418 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0.00 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.00 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.00 Movement Capacity: (pcph) -------------------------------------------------------- 0 S9- 07 41 N ill HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1f NE536STS.HCO Page 3 Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph)(sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh) -------- ------ ------ -------------------- -------------- EB T 1411 968 > 223.1 EB R 8 1385 > 970 223.1 61.8 F WB L 0 0> 0 * * F WB T 106 1016 > NB L 12 1714 2.1 0.0 A 0.3 Intersection Delay = * * The calculated value was greater than 999.9. 99- J'0 a HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1f BBTSITEP.HCO Page 1 Transport Analysis Professionals, Inc. 8701 SW 137th Avenue Suite 210 Miami, FL 33183-4498 Ph: (305) 385-0777 Streets: (N-S) Biscayne Bay Towers (E-W) NE 36th Street Major Street Direction.... EW Length of Time Analyzed... 15 (min) Analyst.. .......... TAP/RPE Date of Analysis.......... 9/7/98 Other Information......... Proposed Site Entrance Volume W/New Pav ement Marking Geometry Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R__J L T R L T R L T R 1 0 1 21 35 .75 .75 0 No. Lanes Stop/Yield Volumes PHF Grade MC' s ( o ) SU/RV's (%) CV' s PCE's ------------ 1 2 0 N. 84 1103 .9 .9 0 1.10 --------------- 0 1 < 0 N 1 1 .25 .25 0 ---------------- Adjustment Factors 1.10 1.10 --------------- Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver ------------------------------------------------------------------ Gap (tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road 5.00 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.00 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 6.50 3.40 99- 107 ar+ low r I4- HCS: Unsignali2ed Intersections Release 2.1f BBTSITEP.HCO Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection -------------------------------------------------------- Step 1: RT from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 6 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1375 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1375 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.96 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 2: LT from Major Street WB EB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 8 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1699 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1699 Prob. of Queue -Free State: --------------------------------------------------------- 0.94 Step 4: LT from Minor Street NB SB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 1325 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 181. Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0.94 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.94 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.94 Movement Capacity: (pcph) -------------------------------------------------------- 170 Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph)(sec/veh) -------- ------ ------ ------ (veh) -------------- ----- (sec/veh) --------- SB L 31 170 25.8 0.6 D 11.4 SB R 52 1375 2.7 0.0 A EB L 102 1699 2.3 Intersection Delay = 0.1 A 0.2 0.7 sec/veh 99- '307 tN HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1f BBTSITE.HCO Page 1 Transport Analysis Professionals, Inc. 8701 SW 137th Avenue Suite 210 Miami, FL 33183-4498 Ph: (305) 385-0777 Streets: (N-S) Biscayne Bay Towers E-W NE 36th Street Major Street Direction.... EW Length of Time Analyzed... 15 (min) Analyst.. .. .......... TAP/RPE Date of Analysis......... 9/7/98 Other Information ......... Proposed Site Entrance Volume Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection ----------------- Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R-- - L T R -L- T R I L T R ---- ---- ----- ---- ---- - ---- ---- ---- ---- No. Lanes Stop/Yield Volumes PHF Grade MC's M SU/RV's (o) CV's M PCE's ------------ 0 > 2 0 N 84 1103 .9 .9 0 1.10 --------------- 0 1 < 0 N 47 1 .25 .25 0 ---------------- Adjustment Factors 1 0 1 21 35 .85 .85 0 1.10 1.10 --------------- Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver ------------------------------------------------------------------ Gap (tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road 5.00 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.00 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 6.50 3.40 3J-- -07 'k. HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1f BBTSITE.HCO Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection -------------------------------------------------------- Step 1: RT from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 190 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1109 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1109 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.96 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 2: LT from Major Street WB EB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 192 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1389 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1389 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.93 TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 3400 RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) Major LT Shared Lane Prob. of Queue -Free State: -------------------------------------------------------- 0.89 Step 4: LT from Minor Street -------------------------------------------------------- NB SB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 1509 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 142 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0.89 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.89 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.89 Movement Capacity: (pcph) -------------------------------------------------------- 126 Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph)(sec/veh) -------- ------ ------ ------------- (veh) ------- ----- (sec/veh) SB L 28 126 36.6 0.7 E --------- 15.8 SB R 45 1109 3.4 0.0 A EB L 102 1389 2.8 0.1 A 0.2 Intersection Delay = 0.9 sec/veh 99- '3V N,- TAB 3 %1- BISCAYNE BAY TOWER C Miami, Florida SITE UTILITY STUDY Submitted to the City of Miami January,1999 Job No. 9828 Prepared For: First Capital Trust, Inc. By: Fortin, Leavy, Skiles Inc. 180 N.E. 1681h Street North Miami Beach, FL 33162 .w 9 9 - J0 a BISCAYNE BAY TOWER SITE UTILITY STUDY I. GENERAL SUMMARY. The project, a 358 unit apartment building, will occupy the two blocks between N.E. 5`n Avenue and N.E. 71h Avenue, north of N.E. 36`h Street and South of I-195, generally known as Block 2 and Block 3 of the plat of WEST POINT, Plat Book 18, Page 73, Dade County records. The right of ways of N.E. 6th Avenue and N.E. 71h Avenue, between N.E. 36`h Street and 1-195, will be vacated by replat and combined with the two referenced blocks to comprise the area for the project, being about 2.01 acres. The Miami -Dade Water and Sewer Department has facilities adjacent to the project and can provide adequate water and sewer service for the project. Drainage will be provided by on -site stormwater disposal wells. Telephone service will be provided by BellSouth and will be adequate for the building. Electric service will be provided by Florida, Power & Light Co. and will be adequate for the building. Solid Waste collection and recycling services will be provided by a private hauler. II. WATER AND SEWER. A. Water: The Miami -Dade Water and Sewer Department owns and operates a 36-inch water transmission main in N.E. 36`h Street. A new 12-inch water main will be connected to this transmission main and will be extended along N.E. 361h Street from N.E. 5ch Avenue to N.E. 71h Avenue. The domestic water and fire protection lines and hydrants will be connected to the 12-inch line to provide service to the building. The existing water service lines in N.E. 6`h Avenue and in N.E. 7ch Avenue will be closed and will be removed if they are in conflict with the building foundation. A copy of the Water and Sewer availability letter from the Miami -Dade Water and Sewer Department is attached. B. Sewer: `The Miami -Dade Water and Sewer Department owns and operates existing 8-inch gravity sewer lines in N.E. 36`h Street and N.E. 5`h Avenue and N.E. 61h Avenues. 99- 2307 t. The existing sewer in N.E. 61h Avenue will be abandoned and removed, except for l the southerly end of the line which may be used as the building's lateral service line. The laterals servicing the existing buildings will be plugged at the Right-of- way line when the buildings are removed. C. Demand and Flow. Water Demand = 200 GPD per Apartment Unit. Average Day Demand = 358 x 200 = 71,600 GPD Average Hour Demand = 50 GPM ± Peak Demand = 2.5 x Ave. Demand = 125 GPM Sewage Flow = 200 GPD per Apt. Unit Average Flow = 358 x 200 = 71,600 GPD Peak Flow = 4.0 x Ave. Flow = 200 GPM ± The 12-inch water main connection to the 36-inch water transmission main will provide adequate fire flow for the building. The 8-inch gravity sewer line in N.E. 361h Street is connected to a 60-inch interceptor main in Biscayne Boulevard and will provide adequate sewage collection service. Reference is made to the attached Miami -Dade Water and Sewer Department letter for additional information. III. Drainage. Storm drainage for the project will be provided by installing drainage disposal wells. The discharge into the wells will be by gravity (not injection wells) and they will be installed per the requirements of DERM and the Florida Department of Environmental Protection. Oil Skimmer and sedimentation tanks will be used to treat the storm water before it is discharged into the wells. There is no positive drainage outfall available for the project. Water quality criteria will be met by discharging the first inch or 2.5 inches x % impervious of runoff, whichever is greater, into the disposal wells. The wells will also be designed to accept the peak runoff discharge from a 5-year storm. Disposal wells in this area are generally able to discharge about 1,000 GPM per Ft. of Head. The following preliminary calculation indicates that four wells will be required. Site Area = 2.01 Ac. ± 1/3 Vertical surface of building = 0.75 Ac. ± Design Area for Drainage Calcs: = 2.76 Ac. ± 5 yr. Storm Intensity Runoff coefficient Peak runoff Lowest Catch Basin Design Water Level Available Discharge Head Discharge per well Number of wells required 6.0 in/hr. t 0.9 0.9x6.0x2.76 = 14.90cfs Say 15 cfs = El. 5.0 ± El. 3_0 t 2.0 ft. 2.0 x 1,000 GPM/ft. = 2,000 GPM = 4.45 cfs = 15 cfs _ 4.45 cfs/well = 3.36, say 4 wells. After deducting the open space/pervious area from the site area of 2.01 acres, the project will have less than 2.0 acres of horizontal impervious surface, so it will qualify for a "No Notice" General Environmental Resources Permit which is processed and issued by DERM. There are no wetlands on the property. IV. SOLID WASTE. There are 358 apartments being proposed in the building. Dade County estimates that each apartment will generate about 8 pounds of solid waste each day resulting in about 1.43 tons per day of solid waste. Recycling facilities and containers will be provided per County Ordinance. V. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Letter from Miami -Dade Water and Sewer Department. 2. Utility Plan, showing existing utilities. 90- 307 67p2t� MIAMI•DADE WATER AND SEWER DEPAR'i IT P.O. Box 330316, ,..,ami, Florida 33233-0316 • 3575 S. lekune Road • Tel: 305-665.7471 • Fax: 669.7656 SERVE • CONSERVE October 61h, 1998 Mr. Carl L. Skiles, P.E. Fortin, Leavy, Skiles, Inc. 180 N.E. 1681h Street North Miami Beach, Florida 33162 Re: Water and Sewer Availability to a Property Located at N.E. 361h Street and 1-95; and N.E. 51h and 71h Avenues, Miami, Florida. Dear Mr. Skiles: This is in response to your inquiry dated September 18" , 1998, regarding water and sewer availability to the referenced project, for the proposed construction of four hundred twenty (420) apartment residential units. The County owns and operates a thirty-six (36) inch water main located in N.E. 50, Avenue and N.E. 361h Street, from which the property owner may connect and install a twelve (12) inch water main in N.E. 361h Street easterly to the southeast corner and within the referenced property. The COUNTY also owns and operates eight (8) inch gravity sewer mains located in N.E. 36`h Street, N.E. 51h Avenue and N.E. 61h Avenue from which the property owner may connect the referenced property and install and connect any proposed eight (8) inch gravity sewer main within the referenced property, provided that there is sufficient depth and that there are no obstacles which would preclude construction of the sewer. These matters shall be addressed and resolved by the DEVELOPER'S engineer. Other points of connection may be established subject to approval of the DEPARTMENT. The right to connect the owner's property to the COUNTY'S sewer system is subject to the terms, covenants and conditions set forth in the Settlement Agreement between the State of Florida Department of Environmental Protection ("DEP") and the COUNTY dated February 16th, 1993, the Settlement Agreement between DEP and the COUNTY dated July 27th, 1993, the First Amendment to Settlement Agreement between DEP and the COUNTY dated December 21, 1995, the First Partial Consent Decree and the Second and Final partial Consent Decree United States of America Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) vs. Metropolitan Dade County (Case Number 93-1109 CIV-Moreno), as currently in effect or as amended or modified in the future agreements and all other current, subsequent or future agreements, court orders, judgments, consent orders, consent decrees and the like entered into between the COUNTY and 99- 307 i i t�. 7_ a 7Z 70 October 6th, 1998 Mr. Carl L. Skiles, P.E. Page 2 the United States, State of Florida or any other governmental entity, and all other current, subsequent or future enforcement and regulatory actions and proceedings. If any water services of two (2) inches in diameter or less are required to be installed from existing water mains, the Department shall perform the work. The property owner will be required to pay the Department's standard installation fee prior to any such installations. Installation time is approximately eight (8) to twelve (12) weeks from the time the said payment is received. Information concerning the estimated cost of facilities must be obtained from a consulting engineer. All costs of engineering and construction will be the responsibility of the property owner. In addition, the Department's standard water and sewer connection charges will be required. Easements must be provided covering any on -site facilities which will be owned and operated by the Department. Construction connection charges and connection charges shall be determined once the property owner enters into an agreement for water and sewer service with the Department. The availability of water and sewer service for the subject property is conditional upon the approval of various regulatory agencies and no continuing unconditional commitment can be made at this time. Consequently, this letter is for informational purposes only and is not intended as a commitment for service. All conditions noted herein are effective only for thirty (30) days from the date of this letter. When development plans for the subject property are finalized, and upon the owner's request, we will be pleased to prepare an agreement for water and sewer service, provided the Department is able to offer those services at the time of the owner's request. The agreement will detail requirements for off -site and on -site facilities, points of connection, connection charges, capacity reservation and all other terms and conditions necessary for service in accordance with the Department's Rules and Regulations. If we can be of further assistance in this matter, please contact us. Very trul ours, Ad maguer ew Business Administrator Officer Utilities Development Division 0307 IL 7- TAB 4 V- a N BISCAYNE BAY TOWER, L.L.C. ECONOMIC AND TAX IMPACT STUDY SUBMITTED TO: CITY OF MIAMI PREPARED FOR: FIRST CAPITAL TRUST, INC. PREPARED BY: SHARPTON, BRUNSON & COMPANY, P.A. One Southeast Third Ave. Suite 2100 Miami, Florida 33131 (305) 374-1574 January 7, 1999 99-- 30 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE C SUMMARY OF BENEFITS 1 INTRODUCTION, OBJECTIVES AND DEFINITIONS Introduction 3 Objectives 3 Definition of Economic and Tax Impact 3 Direct and Indirect Effects 4 Measures of Economic Impact 5 Description of Results 6 THE PROJECT OVERVIEW 7 DISCUSSION OF THE RESULTS OF THE ANALYSIS Impact Indicators 8 Results of Indicators 8 Impact of Construction 9 Impact of Ongoing Operations 9 Impact on Local Tax Revenues 9 DISCUSSION OF THE RESULTS BY ECONOMIC INDICATOR Employment 10 Wages 11 Output 11 Local Taxes 13 OTHER CONSIDERATIONS Public Sector Cost 15 Impact Fees 15 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS 16 EXHIBITS 17 Exhibit I: Summary of Economic Impact Exhibit 11: Summary of all Direct Economic Benefits Exhibit III: Computation of Indirect Benefits Exhibit IV: Schedule of Project Development Cost Exhibit V: Schedule of Ad Valorem Taxes Exhibit VI: Allocation of Ad Valorem Taxes Exhibit VI I: Impact and Other Fees 9 9 - '0"7 ■ SUMMARY OF BENEFITS Significant Community Benefits: • Jobs • Wages • Taxes • Economic Activity Resident's spending impacting Local Businesses: • Food • Recreation/Entertainment • Transportation • Retail BISCAYNE BAY TOWER - Economic Impact Study January 7,1999 Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. Page �, 99- "61 +W SUMMARY OF ECONOMIC IMPACT (BENEFITS) The following table summarizes the economic impact of the Biscayne Bay Tower development: Construction Period Impact Annual Recurrin Economic Activity Stimulated: Output $64,045,691 $3,100,680 Wages 8,550,000 350,000 Taxes 1,152,849 Total $72,595,691 $4,603,529 Jobs created 129 14 Economic Activity Stimulated $60,000,000 $50,000,000 $40,000,000 $30,000,000 $20,000,000 $10,000,000 $0 Construction Annual Recurring Output ® Wages M Taxes BISCAYNE BAY TOWER - Economic Impact Study January 7, 1999 Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. Page 2 99- 007 w v- BISCAYNE BAY TOWER INTRODUCTION, OBJECTIVES AND DEFINITIONS A- INTRODUCTION, OBJECTIVES AND DEFINITIONS Introduction _ This document represents an in-depth economic and tax benefits analysis of the development and operation of a modern residential complex located at the crossroads of Julia Tuttle Causway and Biscayne Bay, betewwn 36th St. and 37th St. (the Project). The Project consists of a 34-story building, above parking, with approximately 358 Luxury Highrise apartment units. The site consists of an assemblage of two city blocks of 8 residential lots each (38,037 Sq. Ft. + 38,850 Sq. Ft. respectively), and two dead-end streets to be abandoned (16,827 Sq. Ft.) comprising a total of 2.013 acres. The Property is conveniently located in that it is equi-distant from the triangle comprised by Miami Beach, the Miami International Airport, and Downtown Miami (approximately 10 minuites driving range). It enjoys undisturbed panoramic views of the Atlantic Ocean and Biscayne Bay. It neighbors the exclusive gated community of Bay Point Estates (North), a highrise condominium (Charter Club), and rental projects (South), such as Hamilton on the Bay. This analysis encompasses the entire Project and estimates the economic and tax benefits for both its development and operational phases. Objectives The objective of this analysis is to provide information on the various benefits created by the Project and to prepare an estimate of such benefits to the city of Miami, (the City). Our analysis is based on an economic model which estimates economic and tax impacts of various projects on a designated area. The model is specifically tailored to the economy of the City. Definition of Economic and Tax Impact The construction and subsequent operation of the Project will create important benefits within Greater Miami. These benefits include new income, new jobs, new tax revenues and new economic activity impacting upon every sector of the local economy. Moreover, through the multiplier effect of respending and reinvesting, indirect economic benefits are added to the direct benefits brought about by initial construction expenditures and the expenditures from ongoing operations. BISCAYNE BAY TOWER - Economic Impact Study January 7,1999 Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. 9 9_ 307 Page 3 %. - —= t INTRODUCTION, OBJECTIVES AND DEFINITIONS [direct and Indirect Effects The total economic impact of public and private projects and policies on a region do not end with the impact from the initial construction expenditures; the continued benefits to the local economy must also be considered. Income to firms furnishing construction materials and services is subsequently converted into employee salaries, material purchases, investment in plant and equipment, savings, profits, purchases of services, and a variety of other economic activities. Income to laborers is subsequently respent for purchases of food, housing, transportation, entertainment, education, medical and dental services, clothing, personal services, and a wide variety of other goods and services. Furthermore, income to governmental units is respent as salaries, purchases, and support of a variety of programs, including education, transportation, and social services. In turn, individuals, firms, and governments furnishing these goods and services again spend their income for more purchases, salaries, investments, and savings. in this manner, indirect benefits result each time the initial sum is respent, and the additional sum available in the local economy induces further job creation, business development and savings. Quantification of these indirect benefits has been the object of considerable economic study. Because economic relationships are so complex in our modern society, no single area or political unit is a completely self-contained economic unit. Therefore, purchases from other areas and political units are necessary, and goods and services are exported in return. As purchases are made from other units, some of the benefits of economic respending are lost to the local economy. Ultimately, a smaller and smaller portion of the initial sum would remain, until, after several rounds of respending, an insignificant sum is left. The indirect effects can be viewed as a set of "ripples" in the economy. Indirect, like direct, resources require labor, materials, equipment and services for their production to induce further job creation and spending of wages. BISCAYNE BAY TOWER - Economic Impact Study Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. January 7, 1999 Page 4 99- a0 7 1 A, �11 INTRODUCTION, OBJECTIVES AND DEFINITIONS The "ripple" impact of the indirect effect multiplies the original impact of the purchase. The common measure of the magnitude of the "ripple" effect is called a multiplier. A multiplier measures the total magnitude of the impact on each particular economic indicator as a multiple of the initial, direct effect. For instance, a multiplier of 1" would signify no "ripple" effects as the total impact is 1 times the initial impact, while a multiplier of "2" would imply that the total impact is 2 times the direct effect. The actual magnitude of a multiplier depends on the likelihood the goods and services purchased in a region would be produced in, or provided from the region. The model we used to estimate the total economic impact incorporates a multiplier developed by utilizing past consumption and production patterns in the City. Measures of Economic Impact Various measures can be used to indicate the impact of a policy or project on a region. Specifically, for this study, they are the changes (increases) in local employment, wages, tax revenue and output that result. Definitions of these measures are as follows: • Employment is measured in full -time -equivalent jobs. • Wages include wages, salaries, and proprietors income only. They may include non -wage compensation, such as pensions, insurance, and other fringe benefits. Wages are assumed to be expended by households in the area at which the wage-earner resides. • Local taxes include additional revenues from both ad valorem and non ad valorem assessments. BISCAYNE BAY TOWER - Economic Impact Study January 7, 1999 Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. -07 Page 5 %1- INTRODUCTION, OBJECTIVES AND DEFINITIONS Measures of Economic Impact (Continued) • pirect Expenditures include those sums expended for land acquisition, site preparation and all hard and soft costs associated with the project. • Indirect Expenditures are those sums expended within the local economy as a result of the "ripple" effect described earlier. • Output describes total economic activity, and is essentially equivalent to the sum of direct and indirect expenditures (exclusive of wages and taxes). Description of Results For the purpose of describing the total economic benefits of the Project, the related expenditures have been broken into two categories: (1) Development (2) Operational Developmental expenditures include those expenditures related to the design and construction phase of the Project and related amenities. Operational expenditures are those expenditures incurred in connection with the ongoing operation of the apartment complex. BISCAYNE BAY TOWER - Economic Impact Study January 7, 1999 Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. 9 9 + 307 Page 6 7' BISCAYNE BAY TOWER THE PROJECT OVERVIEW g g -- j Q'� PROJECT OVERVIEW The Project The Project consists of a 34 story building, above parking, with approximately 358 Luxury High-rise residential units. It is located at the crossroads of Julia Tuttle Causeway and Biscayne Bay, between 36th and 37th Streets. Construction is expected to commence in September, 1999. The construction period is expected to be 20 to 24 months. BISCAYNE BAY TOWER - Economic Impact Study January 7, 1999 Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. '"' 307 07 page 7 a` BISCAYNE BAY TOWER DISCUSSION OF THE RESULTS OF THE ANALYSIS 99- 30'7 K'• 1 DISCUSSION OF THE RESULTS OF THE ANALYSIS Impact Indicators We measured the project's impact on four commonly -used indicators of economic activity. Those indicators are: • Jobs • Wages • Total output • Local taxes Results of Indicators The economic indicator most commonly measured, and publicly reported on to gauge the economic impact of a public project is output. The impact of a project on the indicator output is often referred to as the project's economic impact. Exhibits I - III detail the Project's direct and indirect impact on the above economic indicators for Greater Miami. A summary of such impact follows: Development, One -Time Employment Wages Output Taxes Total Direct Indirect 129 $8,550,000 $35,742,258 28,303,433 $44,292,258 28,303,433 Total Development Impact 129 $8,550,000 $64,045,691 $72,595,691 Operational Annual Direct Indirect 14 $350,000 $1,650,000 1,450,680 $1,152,849 $3,152,849 1,450,680 Total Operational Impact 14 $350,000 $3,100,68 $1,152,84 $4,603.529 BISCAYNE BAY TOWER - Economic Impact Study a� January 7, 1999 Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. 9 9— 3 0 7 Page 8 �4' DISCUSSION OF THE RESULTS OF THE ANALYSIS Impact of Construction: The site preparation and construction expenditures, including soft costs, estimated at $38 million, within Greater Miami would create approximately 120 new full time equivalent jobs and a maximum of 200 workers employed during peak periods. The workers will earn approximately $8.5 million in wages. These jobs will primarily be in the construction, transportation and related service industries. Spending for site preparation and project construction will result in a total estimated impact of $67 million dollars, excluding marketing and financing costs. Impact of Ongoing Operations As a result of the on -going operation of the apartment complex, Greater Miami will gain approximately 14 new, permanent, full-time equivalent jobs. The workers who obtain these positions will earn approximately $350 thousand annually. The total expenditures for the Project's operations will provide a new, permanent impact of $3.4 million annually to the City's economy. This impact consists of the effects of the direct expenditures from the maintenance and security of the apartment complex, as well as the multiplied effects of such spending thus creating indirect benefits. Impact on Local Tax Revenues As a result of the construction and operation of the Project, various state, county, and city governments and agencies would gain an estimated annual tax benefit of $1.1 million. The specific entities receiving these tax revenues are shown on page 14. BISCAYNE BAY TOWER - Economic Impact Study January 7, 1999 Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. 9 9 _ v Page 9 N,. wi. - nor BISCAYNE BAY TOWER DISCUSSION OF RESULTS BY ECONOMIC INDICATOR 99- 307 DISCUSSION OF RESULTS BY ECONOMIC INDICATOR 11 Our analysis of the economic and tax benefits of the Project was done by each major phase of the project. We identified the major phases to be development and operations. This analysis determines the economic benefits to the City by identifying such benefits for each of the phases. The effect on economic indicators used to measure benefits (employment, wages, output and taxes) were computed for each phase. Employment Employment is one of the most important economic benefits of the development. It is one of the most accessible and direct benefits for the City's residents and is a primary means by which development, operations and maintenance expenditures generate indirect economic benefits. A portion of this employment occurs on -site in the form of short-term development and marketing activity, and a portion is longer term employment derived from on -going operations. Further employment is generated off -site by expenditures of the business owners and office wokers in area businesses. As can be seen in Exhibit i, total short term (Developmental) employment will average 129 employees over a 20 month period and the total on -going employment will average 14. The total on -going positions can be summarized as follows: • Leasing Staff • Management • Security/Police & Parking • Maintenance and Clean -Up From statistical data obtained from the Tourism Department, spending in the City is classified into various expenditure categories. These include: • Eating/Drinking • Auto Rental • Service Station • Retail • Grocery • Other Transportation • Recreation BISCAYNE BAY TOWER - Economic Impact Study January 7, 1999 Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. 9 J + SO-7 Page 10 4.- DISCUSSION OF RESULTS BY ECONOMIC INDICATOR Although it is known that these expenditures will be made, in the interest of conservatism, we did not include same in this report. We took this approach because we believe it would be difficult to contend that a majority of the occupants of this Project will come from out of town rather than other parts of Greater Miami. Wages The computation of wages are a direct by-product of employment. As discussed in the above section, both on -site and off -site jobs are created. These jobs were both temporary and permanent in nature. To compute the wages associated with the new employment we started with budgeted data directly related to the development and operations of the Project. Employment created, such as construction related employment, was obtained directly from construction estimates. These numbers were tested for reasonableness. Output Total output generated as a result of the development and operations of the Project is caused by the following type of expenditures. • Developer cost expended in the City (100%) • Annual operational expenditures of management company • New spending in Greater Miami by office workers, visitors, employees and business owners Exhibit II shows a summary of the development cost expended in Greater Miami and of operational expenditures made in relation to the on -going maintenance of the Project. Exhibit IV gives a detailed breakdown of the development costs. BISCAYNE BAY TOWER - Economic Impact Study January 7,1999 Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. 9 9 _ J ®( Page 11 DISCUSSION OF RESULTS BY ECONOMIC INDICATOR Output To incorporate the impact of dollars being respent and/or reinvested in the City, a multiplier was applied to total direct output. A multiplier of 1.8792 was used to determine total direct and indirect output created by the Project. This multiplier indicates that for every $100 spent in Greater Miami, another $87.92 will be respent or reinvested in Greater Miami. This multiplier was obtained from the Dade County Planning Department. Direct output from the development phase of the Project is primarily a result of developer costs. This cost consists of land acquisition and site preparation, soft and hard costs which includes construction. To determine the total direct output we determined what development cost specifically was expected to be or had been spent in Greater Miami. Total direct output exclusive of wages during the development phase is $36 million. Total indirect output created by the direct respending in Greater Miami is $28 million. Thus total Greater Miami Output from the development of the Project is $64 million. The final component of output results from the direct operating expenditures of the residential units and the indirect benefits created as a result of the multiplier effect on direct output. The Developer provided us with an annual operating budget for the Project. An overall assumption was made that all expenditures would be spent initially in the City. The total operating expenditures incorporate all estimated expenses of operation of the Project except for wages. The impact of wages was measured separately as an economic indicator. To incorporate the potential respending and reinvesting in Greater Miami, the multiplier effect was measured. By applying a multiplier of 1.8792 to the total direct output from operating expenditures, we determined total output (direct and indirect) from on -going operating expenditures. BISCAYNE BAY TOWER - Economic Impact Study January 7, 1999 Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. Page 12 �0 �07 In DISCUSSION OF RESULTS BY ECONOMIC INDICATOR Output (Contd.) Total direct output created from operating expenditures is $1.7 million. Total indirect output created from operating expenditures is $1.4 million. Total output created from ongoing operations is $3.1 million. Local Taxes A key and significant benefit generated from the development and operation of the Project _ is taxes. Several types of tax revenue will be generated from this project including both ad valorem and other taxes. Specific ad valorem taxes include real and personal property taxes. 'Other taxes include occupational taxes, resort taxes and community development taxes. New real property taxes will be assessed on the Project. The assessment is based on a predetermined millage rate being applied to the taxable value of the real property. We computed real property taxes for the development phase based on the cost of the development of the project. This assessment base is very conservative since tax on real property typically is assessed on appraised values and not cost. Cost was used in the place of an estimated appraisal for conservatism. The basis for ongoing taxes is also overall cost. The millage rate was obtained from the County Tax Collectors office relative to the Project's location. Exhibit V shows the tax computation. The real property taxes expected to be generated annually are approximately $1.1 million. BISCAYNE BAY TOWER - Economic Impact Study January 7,1999 Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. g 9 _ 4 O 7 Page 13 1, DISCUSSION OF RESULTS BY ECONOMIC INDICATOR Local Taxes (Contd.) Total ad valorem taxes assessed by Dade County are allocated based on mileage rates to certain governmental entities. Listed below is the allocation of projected tax revenue. nu Revenues City Operating $385,724 Schools 354,170 County Operating 232,321 Debt Service - Ci 69,044 Debt Service - County 32,285 South Florida Water 23,028 Library Operating 12,883 School Debt Service 37,724 Florida Inland Navigation 1,813 Environmental Projects 3,857 Total $1,152,849 Although not quantified, Greater Miami, through its receipt of allocated state sales taxes will receive an additional benefit as a result of the development and operation of the project. BISCAYNE BAY TOWER - Economic Impact Study January 7,1999 Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. �I Page 14 �0 t4.