Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
R-00-1137
J-00-1033 12 / 1,4 / 0 0 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE MIAMI CITY COMMISSION, WITH ATTACHMENTS, APPROVING WITH CONDITIONS, A MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT PURSUANT TO ARTICLES 13 AND 17 OF ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 11000, FOR THE ONE MIAMI - PHASE I PROJECT, A PHASED PROJECT TO BE LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY 205 SOUTH BISCAYNE BOULEVARD, MIAMI, FLORIDA, TO BE COMPRISED OF NOT MORE THAN 425 RESIDENTIAL UNITS, ACCESSORY RECREATIONAL SPACE, 623,348 SQUARE FEET OF OFFICE, RETAIL AND OTHER NONRESIDENTIAL USE AND 1,834 PARKING SPACES; DIRECTING TRANSMITTAL OF THE HEREIN RESOLUTION; MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATING CONCLUSIONS OF LAW; PROVIDING FOR BINDING EFFECT; CONTAINING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, on November 17, 1998, the City Commission approved Resolution No. 98-1151, thus approving a Master Development Program which included the property located at approximately 205 South Biscayne Boulevard, Miami, Florida,; and WHEREAS, on September 7, 2000, The Related Group of Florida and Miami One Centre, LP, (hereinafter referred to as "APPLICANT"), submitted a complete application for a substantial modification to the previously approved Major Use Special Permit for the One Miami - Phase I Project pursuant to Articles 13 CITY COMMISSION MEETING OF, DEC 1 4 2000 Resolution N and 17 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended, (the "Zoning Ordinance") to approve a specific project (hereinafter referred to as the "PROJECT") for the property located at approximately 205 South Biscayne Boulevard, Miami, Florida, as legally described on "Exhibit B", attached hereto, and in "Exhibit A", the Development Order, attached hereto; and WHEREAS, the Large Scale Development Committee met on August 22, 2000, to consider the proposed PROJECT and offer its input; and WHEREAS, the APPLICANT has modified the proposed PROJECT to address the expressed technical concerns raised at said Large Scale Development Committee meeting; and WHEREAS, the Urban Development Review Board met on October 23, 2000 to consider the proposed PROJECT and recommended approval, with conditions as specified in the attached Development Order, of the PROJECT; and WHEREAS, the Miami Zoning Board, at its meeting held on October 16, 2000, Item No. 5, following an advertised public hearing, adopted Resolution No. ZB 2000-0369 by a vote of seven to zero (7-0), RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of the Major Use Special Permit Development Order as attached hereto; and WHEREAS, the Miami Planning Advisory Board, at its meeting held on November 15, 2000, Item No. 8, following an advertised Page 2 of 8 0�1-1� public hearing, adopted Resolution No. PAB 72-00 by a vote of six to one (6-1), RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of the Major Use Special Permit Development Order as attached hereto; and WHEREAS, the City Commission deems it advisable and in the best. interest of the general welfare of the City of Miami to issue a Major Use Special Permit Development Order as hereinafter set forth; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. The recitals and findings contained in the Preamble to this Resolution are adopted by reference and incorporated as if fully set forth in this Section. Section 2. A Major Use Special Permit Development Order, attached hereto as "Exhibit A" and made a part hereof, is approved, subject to a review by the City Commission at the January 11, 2001 City Commission meeting, for the limited purpose of reviewing modifications pertaining to the parking garage and treatment of the blank wall, and subject to the conditions specified in said Development Order, per Article 17 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, for the One Miami - Phase I Project (hereinafter referred to as the "PROJECT") to be developed by The Related Group of Florida and Miami One Page 3 of 8+ Centre, LP, (the "APPLICANT"), at approximately 205 South Biscayne Boulevard, Miami, Florida, more particularly described on "Exhibit B", attached hereto and made a part hereof. Section 3. The PROJECT is approved as Phase I of a phased development for the construction of up to 425 residential units, with accessory recreational space, 623,348 square feet of office, retail and other nonresidential uses and 1,834 parking spaces. Section 4. The Major Use Special Permit Application for the PROJECT also encompasses the lower ranking Special Permits as set forth in the Development Order, attached as "Exhibit A" hereto and incorporated herein. Section 5. The findings of fact set forth below are made with respect to the subject PROJECT: a. The PROJECT is in conformity with the adopted Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000, as amended. b. The PROJECT is in accord with the CBD (Central Business District) Zoning classifications of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended. C. Pursuant to Section 1305 of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, the specific site plan aspects of the PROJECT, i.e., ingress and egress, parking, signs and lighting, utilities, drainage, preservation of natural features and control of potentially adverse effects generally, have been considered and will be further considered administratively during the Ch 7Page 4 of 8 6 0- 1 1 e6 process of issuing a building permit and a certificate of occupancy. d. Phase I of the PROJECT is expected to cost approximately $362 million, and to employ approximately 425 workers during construction (Full Time Employees-FTE); and the PROJECT will also result in the creation of approximately 30 permanent new jobs. The PROJECT will generate approximately $9.1 million annually in tax revenues to local units of government (2000 dollars). e. The City Commission further finds that: (1) the PROJECT will have a favorable impact on the economy of the City; (2) the PROJECT will efficiently use public transportation facilities; (3) any potentially adverse effects of the PROJECT will be mitigated through compliance with the conditions of this Major Use Special Permit; (4) the PROJECT will favorably affect the need for people to find adequate housing reasonably accessible to their places of employment; (5) the PROJECT will efficiently use necessary public facilities; (6) the PROJECT will not negatively impact the environment and natural resources of the City; (7) the PROJECT will not adversely affect living conditions in the neighborhood; (8) the PROJECT will not adversely affect public safety; (9) based on the record presented and evidence presented, the public welfare will be served by the PROJECT; and Page 5 of 8 0 0 -� (10) any potentially adverse effects of the PROJECT arising from safety and security, fire protection and life safety, solid waste, heritage conservation, trees, shoreline development, minority participation and employment, and minority contractor/subcontractor participation will be mitigated through compliance with the conditions of this Major Use Special Permit. (11) The PROJECT complies with the criteria for modification of the Waterfront Charter provisions as specified in Section 3(mm)(ii) of the City Charter. Section 6. The Major Use Special Permit, as approved and amended, shall be binding upon the APPLICANT and any successors in interest. Section 7. The application for Major Use Special Permit, which was submitted on September 7, 2000, and is on file with the Department of Planning and Zoning of the City Of Miami, Florida, shall be relied upon generally for administrative interpretations and is made a part hereof by reference. Section 8. The City Manager is directed to instruct the Director of the Department of Planning and Zoning to transmit a copy of this Resolution and attachment to the developers: Lucia A. Dougherty, Esq. on behalf of The Related Group of Florida and Miami One Centre, LP, 1221 Brickell Avenue, Miami, FL 33131. Page 6 of 8 00-1167 Section 9. The Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law are made with respect to the PROJECT as described in the Development Order for the One Miami - Phase I Project, which is attached hereto as "Exhibit A" and made a part hereof by reference. Section 10. The Major Use Special Permit Development Order for the One Miami - Phase I Project ("Exhibit A") is granted and issued, subject to a review by the City Commission at its January 11, 2001 City Commission meeting, for the limited purpose of reviewing modifications pertaining to the parking garage and treatment of the blank wall. Section 11. In the event that any portion or section of this Resolution or the Development Order ("Exhibit A") is determined to be invalid, illegal, or unconstitutional by a court or agency of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall in no manner affect the remaining portions of this Resolution or Development Order ("Exhibit A") which shall remain in full force and effect. Section 12. The provisions approved for this Major Use Special Permit, as approved, shall commence and become operative thirty (30) days after the adoption of the herein Resolution. Section 13. This Major Use Special Permit, as approved, shall expire two (2) years from its commencement and operative date. Page 7 of 8 ® 0,- 11 31 Section 14. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its adoption and signature of the Mayor.!' PASSED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of December , 2000. JOE CAROLLO, MAYOR In amordance with Miami Code Sec. 2-36, since the Mayor did not indicate approval of Wis legislation by signing it in the designated pl- e provided, said legisla,1-- now becomes effective with the elapse sPen day rom the d, 'a of Commh action wing same, without the May exe is' eto �Z, Z'' �,Wa�lterl ��ity ClerkATTEST: WALTER J. FOEMAN CITY CLERK TO FOIAND CORRECTNESS:& ATTORN2Y W4882.'� VMmea:BSS If the Mayor does not sign this Resolution, it shall become effective at the end of ten calendar days from the date it was passed and adopted. If the Mayor vetoes this Resolution, it shall become effective immediately upon override of the veto by the City Commission. Page 8 of 8 r� .,� 00-11 1.6 4 "EXHIBIT A" ATTACHMENT TO RESOLUTION NO. 00-1137 DATE: December 14, 2000 ONE MIAMI - PHASE I PROJECT MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT DEVELOPMENT ORDER Let it be known that pursuant to Articles 13 and 17 of Ordinance No. 11000, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended, the Commission of the City of Miami, Florida, has considered in a public hearing, the -issuance of a Major Use Special Permit for the One Miami - Phase I Project (hereinafter referred to as the "PROJECT") to be located at approximately 205 South Biscayne Boulevard, Miami, Florida; see legal description on "Exhibit B", attached hereto and made a part hereof; said legal description is subject to any dedications, limitations, restrictions, reservations or easements of record. After due consideration of the recommendations of the Planning Advisory Board and after due consideration of the consistency of this proposed development with the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan, the City Commission has approved the PROJECT, and subject to the following conditions approves the Major Use Special Permit and issues this Permit: FINDINGS OF FACT PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The proposed One Miami - Phase I Project is a residential/office mixed use development to be located at approximately 205 South Biscayne Boulevard, Miami, Florida. The PROJECT is located on a gross lot area of approximately 4.9 acres and a net lot area of approximately 3.04 acres of land (more specifically described on "Exhibit B", incorporated herein by reference). The remainder of the PROJECT DATA is attached hereto as "EXHIBIT C", and incorporated herein by reference. The proposed PROJECT will consist of no more than 425residential units with. accessory recreational space, 623,348 square feet of office, retail and other nonresidential uses. The PROJECT will also provide a total of 1,834 parking spaces. The ownership, operation and maintenance of common areas and facilities will be by the property owner or (in the case of the property being converted to condominiums) a mandatory property owner association in perpetuity pursuant to a recorded Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions. Page 2 of 10 U � JL O, $ The Major Use Special Permit Application for the PROJECT also encompasses the following lower ranking Special Permits: CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 906.6, for active recreational facilities (including a swimming pool); CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Section 915.2 for FAA clearance letter; CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT to permit staging and parking during construction (to be approved prior to obtaining a building permit from the Department'of Planning and Zoning) ; CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT for Development Signs when combined with construction/rental signs; CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 917.2.1, to allow valet parking for residential use; CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT for a temporary construction trailer; CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 4, Section 401, for development of new construction within the Central Business District; CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT for a temporary construction fence and covered walkway; CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 15 for any development between Biscayne Bay and the first dedicated right-of-way; CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 15 for waiver of certain Guides and Standards for 5 foot (51) driveway from property line; CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Section 908.2, for access from a public street or roadway width greater than 25 feet; CLASS II. SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 908 for development on Biscayne Boulevard; P Cry d.� .1 Q ,�, Page 3 of 10 A _G. 0 d Special Exception as per Article 4, Sec. 401, to allow bar/lounge open to the public; Special Exception as per Article 9, Sec. 917.1.2, to allow valet parking for restaurant up to fifty percent (50%) of existing off-street parking spaces; Certificate of Appropriateness for ground disturbing activity in an archeological conservation area (City Code Section 23-5a); Designation as a phased project, pursuant to Section 2502 of Zoning Ordinance 11000, as amended; and Waiver from the City Commission for.the following: 1. Noise Ordinance during the required concrete pours for construction of the building (City Code Chapter 36) . ' 2. Waterfront Charter provision 3(mm)(iii). Pursuant to Articles 13 and 17 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, approval of the requested Major Use Special Permit shall be considered sufficient for the subordinate permits requested and referenced above as well as any other special approvals required by the City which may be required to carry out the requested plans. The PROJECT shall be constructed substantially in accordance with plans and design schematics on file prepared by Arquitectonica, dated September, 2000; the landscape plan shall be implemented substantially in accordance with plans and design Page 4 of 10 0 ur, � schematics on file prepared by Curtis & Rogers Design Studio, Inc., dated September, 2000; said design and landscape plans may be permitted to be modified only to the extent necessary to comply with the conditions for approval imposed herein; all modifications shall be subject to the review and approval of the Director of the Department of Planning and Zoning prior to the issuance of any building permits. The PROJECT conforms to the requirements of the CBD (Central Business District) Zoning District, as contained in Ordinance No. 11000, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended. The existing comprehensive plan future land use designation on the subject property allows the proposed mix of residential and commercial uses. CONDITIONS THE APPLICANT, ITS SUCCESSORS, AND/OR ASSIGNS, JOINTLY OR SEVERALLY, PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF ANY BUILDING PERMITS, SHALL COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING: 1. Meet all applicable building codes, land development regulations, ordinances and other laws. 2. Pay all applicable fees due prior to the issuance of a building permit. Page 5 of 10 @a 3. Allow the Miami Police Department to conduct a security survey, at the option of the Department, and to make recommendations concerning security measures and systems; further submit a report to the Department of Planning and Zoning, prior to commencement of construction, demonstrating how the Police Department recommendations, if any, have been incorporated into the PROJECT security and construction plans, or demonstrate to the Planning Director why such recommendations are impractical. 4. Obtain approval from, or provide a letter from the Department of Fire -Rescue indicating APPLICANT'S coordination with members of the Fire Plan Review Section at the Department of Fire -Rescue in the review of the scope of the PROJECT, owner responsibility, building development process and review procedures, as well as specific requirements for fire protection and life safety systems, exiting, vehicular access and water supply. 5. Obtain approval from, or provide a letter of assurance from the Department of Solid Waste that the PROJECT has addressed all concerns of the said Department prior to the obtainment of a shell permit. 6. Prepare a Minority Participation and Employment Plan (including a Contractor/Subcontractor Participation Plan) to be submitted to the City's Director of Equal Employment Opportunity for review and comments, with the understanding that the APPLICANT must use its best efforts to follow the provisions of the City's Minority/Women Business Affairs and Procurement Program as a guide. 7. Record the following in the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, prior to the issuance of a shell permit: (a) a Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions providing that the ownership, operation and maintenance of all common areas and facilities will be by the property owner or a mandatory property owner association in perpetuity; (b) a certified copy of the Development Order specifying that the Development Order runs with the land and is binding on the APPLICANT, its successors, and assigns, jointly or severally. 8. Prior to the issuance of a shell permit, demonstrate to the City that the PROJECT has either: (a) completed its condominium requirements and has been approved for such by Page 6 of 10 0 - 1 11 " "j • • the State of Florida; or (b) provide the City with an executed, recordable unity of title or covenant in -lieu of unity of title agreement for the subject property; said agreement shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Attorney's Office. 9. Provide the Department of Public Works with plans for proposed sidewalk and Swale area improvements (including implementation of the Burle Marx Plan for Biscayne Boulevard) for its review and approval prior to the issuance of a building permit. 10. Provide the Department of Planning and Zoning with a temporary parking plan, including an operational plan, which addresses construction employee parking during the construction period; said plan shall be subject to the review and approval by the Department of Planning and Zoning prior to the issuance of any building permits and shall be enforced during construction activity. 11. Pursuant to the Departments of Fire -Rescue and General Services Administration, the roof area of the proposed structures shall be made available to the City of Miami for any necessary communications equipment at no charge to the City. 12. The APPLICANT shall keep the Miami -Dade County archeologist apprised of all ground disturbing activity; based upon his findings, some level of monitoring by a private archeological consultant may be required. 13. Pursuant to the condition from the Urban Development Review Board and staff design review, the APPLICANT shall submit final revised design details, including materials, color schemes, and final landscape and lighting plan, to the Director of the Panning and Zoning Department for review and approval, prior to the issuance of a building permit; plans shall also include final design and landscape details for the river and bay walks. 14. Prior to the issuance of a shell permit, the APPLICANT shall submit an interim plan, including a landscape plan, which addresses design details for the land occupying Phase II of this PROJECT in the event that the future phase is not developed; said plan shall include a proposed timetable and shall be subject to review and approval by the Director of the Department of Planning and Zoning. G Page 7 of 10 Q�_� 0 $` 15. Prior to the issuance of any building permits for Phase II of this PROJECT, the APPLICANT shall conduct updated traffic studies that shall include recommendations for mitigation. 16. As recommended by the Planning Advisory Board, if a dock is not constructed, a railing (type and design to be approved by the Department of Planning and Zoning) shall be provided along the river/bay walk (due to the particularly turbid conditions of the water at this location). 17. As recommended by the Planning Advisory Board, the APPLICANT shall work with the Department of Planning and Zoning to submit results of a laboratory test regarding archeology. within 90 days of issuance of the Development Order. 18. Prior to issuance of any building permit, solutions to issues relating to providing a more pedestrian -friendly design and environment and to the proximity of the development to the Miami River shall be subject to the review and approval of the Director of Planning and Zoning. THE CITY SHALL: Establish the operative date of this Permit as being thirty (30) days from the date of its issuance; the issuance date shall constitute the commencement of the thirty (30) day period to appeal from the provisions of the Permit. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW The PROJECT proposed by the APPLICANT complies with the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000, is consistent Page 8 of 10 -' 0 0 with the orderly development and goals of the City of Miami, and complies with local land development regulations and further, pursuant to Section 1703 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000: (1) the PROJECT will have a favorable impact on the economy of the City; and (2) the PROJECT will efficiently use public transportation facilities; and (3) the PROJECT will favorably affect the need for people to find adequate housing reasonably accessible to their places of employment; and (4) the PROJECT will efficiently use necessary public facilities; and (5) the PROJECT will not negatively impact the environment and natural resources of the City; and (6) the PROJECT will not adversely affect public safety; and (7) the public welfare will be served by the PROJECT; and (8) any potentially adverse effects of the PROJECT will be mitigated through conditions of this Major Use Special Permit; and (9) the PROJECT complies with the criteria for modification of the Waterfront Charter provisions as specified in Section 3(mm)(ii) of the City Charter. The proposed development does not unreasonably interfere with the achievement of the objectives of the adopted State Land Development Plan applicable to the City of Miami. Pursuant to Section 1305 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, the specific site plan aspects of the PROJECT i.e., ingress and Page 9 of 10 C, 0- I I Qlot, • • egress, offstreet parking .and loading, refuse and service areas, signs and lighting, utilities, drainage and control of potentially adverse effects generally have been considered and will be further considered administratively during the process of issuing individual building permits and certificates of occupancy. Page 10 of 10�� EXHIBIT "B" Extu-bit "2„ All of Tract A, ONE MIANU PARCEL A, recorded in Plat Book 155 at Page 80, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida. 0 1 0 EXHMIT "C" OBE A77A=71RI PROJECT DATA I- SITE LOCATION: 205 SOUTH BISCAYNE BOULEVARD, MIAMI FLORIDA NET LOT AREA: 3.04 ACRES GROSS LOT AREA: 4.9 ACRES ZONING: CBD CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT COMMERCIAL FLOOR AREA RATIO: UNLIMITED MAXIMUM NUMBER OF APARTMENTS :1,500 UNITS (500/ACRE) 11- SETBACKS (CITY -OF MIAMI REQUIRED PROPOSED FRONT 5140' 51-0' REAR 010 01-T SIDE 0'-0' Nr BUILDING HEIGHT UNLIMITED 476'-3' CHARTER PROVISION 50'-0' 20'-0' b'36 4r III- OPEN SPACE CRITERIA FAR. - (50,000y 50 = (532,421 + 623,34M - 50,0001' 50 = 1,105,769/ 50 TOTAL = 22,115 S.F. REQUIRED PROPOSED 22,115 S.F. 69,069 S.F. IV- RESIDENTIAL TOWER GROSS AREA :626,552 S.F. FAR. AREA :532,421 S.F. NUMBER OF UNITS :425 UNITS NUMBER OF FLOORS :49 HEIGHT AT ROOF :46T-0' N.G.V.D. PARAPET HEIGHT :518'-0' N.G.V.D. V- OFFICE TOWER GROSS AREA :707,025 S.F. FAR. AREA :623,348 S.F NUMBER OF FLOORS :34 HEIGHT AT ROOF :476'-3' N.G.V.D. PARAPET HEIGHT :513'-7' N.G.V.D. TYP.GROSS FLR. AREA :22,610 S.F. VI- PARKING GARAGE NUMBER OF FLOORS :12 OFFICE: ANCILLIARY USE: CRITERIA:IPKGJ500 S.F. OF RENTABLE No. OF PKG.: 600,541 S.FJ 500 S.F. =1,201 PKG. SPACES ANCILLIARY USE: CRITERIA : 1 PKG/1,000 S.F. No. OF PKG.:2,972 S.F./1,000 S.F. = 3 PKG. SPACES TOTAL PKG SPACES = 1,204 RESIDENTIAL: ANCILLIARY USE: CRITERIA: No. UNITS @1.3 + 10% VISITORS No. UNITS 425@1.3 = 553 + 10% VISITORS = 596 SPACES ANCILLARY USE:CRITERLki PKGJ1,000 S.F. No. OF PKG.:2,909 M1,000 S.F. = 3 PKG. SPACES TOTAL PKG SPACES = 599 TOTAL PROVIDED A 34 SPACES OFFSTREET LOADING: REQUIRED: (4) BERTH 17x 35' (2) BERTH I Zx 55' RESIDENTIAL: AREA 1FAR. PROVIDED: (4) BERTH 17x 35' (2) BERTH 17x 55' MEZZ 0 1 0 LEVEL 3 8,606 1 8,606 4.5 & 6 11,447 3 34,341 7,8,9,10,11,121113 12,376 7 86,632 POOL 12,376 1 12,376 15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26 27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38, 39,40,41 & 42 12,243 28 342,804 43,44 &45 10,275 3 30,825 46,47 & 48 3,115 3 9,345 49 3,115 1 3,115 TOTAL No. FLOORS = 49 TOTAL M421 S.F. OFFICE: AREA iF.A.R. LEVEL AREA No. OF FLOORS SUB -TOTAL GROUND 9,429 1 9,429 MEZZ - B2 3,992 1 3,992 MEZZ - B3 7,428 1 7,428 MEZZ - 84 11,562 1 11,562 5, 6 , 7 14,113 3 42,339 8, 9,10 19,479 3 58,434 11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22 20,162 12 242,028 23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34 20,678 12 248,136 TOTAL No. FLOORS = 34 TOTAL 623,348 S.F. 00-1137 • • Analysis for major Use Special Permit for the ONE MIAMI — PHASE I PROJECT located at 205 South Biscayne Boulevard CASE NO. 2000-070 Pursuant to Ordinance 11000, as amended, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, the subject proposal for the One Miami — Phase I Project has been reviewed to allow a Major Use Special Permit. This Permit also includes the following requests: CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 906.6 for active recreational facilities (including a swimming pool); CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Section 915.2 for FAA clearance letter; CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT to permit staging and parking during construction (to be approved prior to obtaining a building permit from Planning); CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT for Development Signs when combined with construction/rental signs; CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 917.2.1 to allow valet parking for residential use; CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as for a temporary construction trailer; CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 4, Section 401 for development of new construction within the Central Business District; CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT for a temporary construction fence and covered walkway; CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 15 for any development between Biscayne Bay and the first dedicated right-of-way; CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 15 for waiver of certain Guides and Standards for 5 feet driveway from property line; CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Section 908.2 for access from a public street or roadway width greater than 25 feet; 00' -1137 CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 908 for development on Biscayne Boulevard; Special Exception as per. Article 4, Sec. 401 to allow bar/lounge open to the public; Special Exception as per Article 9, Sec. 917.1.2 to allow valet parking for restaurant up to 50% of existing off-street parking spaces; Certificate .of Appropriateness for ground disturbing activity in an archeological conservation area (city Code Section 23-5a); Designation as a phased project, pursuant to Section 2502 of Zoning Ordinance 11000, as amended. Waiver from the City Commission for the following: 1. Noise Ordinance during the required concrete pours for construction of the building (City Code Chapter 36). 2. Waterfront Charter provision 3(mm)(iii). Pursuant to Articles 13 and 17 of Zoning Ordinance 11000, approval of the requested Major Use Special Permit shall be considered sufficient- for the subordinate permits requested and referenced above as well as any other special approvals required by the City which may be required to carry out the requested plans. The requested Special Permit is for the purpose of allowing a mixed -use development project with consisting of 623,348 sq. ft. of office and retail use, and a total of 425 residential units, with 1,834 parking spaces, for the property located at approximately 205 South Biscayne Boulevard (see attached legal description, location maps and aerial photographs for exact property boundaries). In determining the appropriateness of the proposed residential project, the Planning and Zoning Department has referred this project to the Large Scale Development Committee (LSDC), the City of Miami Preservation Officer, and the Urban Development Review Board (UDRB) for additional input and recommendations; the following findings have been made: CO.-1137 • It is found that the proposed office and residential development project, with accessory retail, will benefit the Downtown District by creating new housing opportunities in the core area to serve Downtown. • It is found that the subject property has convenient access to public transit that makes it ideally suited for residential and office as a mixed use to serve the downtown area. • It is found that per the Fire and GSA Departments of the City, the roof of the proposed structure may be required for communications equipment to serve the City; this are should be made available for said use at no charge to the City. • It is found that the City of.Miami Preservation Officer reviewed the project and that a recommendation was made regarding archeological monitoring in the manner set forth in the condition described below. • It is found that the project was reviewed by the Large Scale Development Committee on August 22, 2000 and has been modified to address the expressed technical concerns raised at said Large Scale Development Committee meeting; however, additional design details related to sidewalk and swale area improvements will have to be submitted at the time of permitting. • It is found that the UDRB has recommended approval of the proposed project, with the condition as specified below, pursuant to a public meeting held on October 23, 2000. UDRB Condition: 1) Make revisions to the apartment buildings and come back to UDRB within 90 days of MUSP approval before building permit. Review: articulation of the apartment building; massing; and detailing. • It is found that the narrow width and irregular shape of a portion of the subject property is a substantial hardship that limits reasonable use of the property and therefore justifies the requested Waterfront Charter modification, and additionally, public benefits have been adequately provided for; final design details pertaining to the bay and river walks shall be subject to review and approval by the Director of Planning and Zoning. • It is found that the proposed project offers the most reasonable solution to the design problem facing this particular site. 001-1 • It is found that upon referral of the proposed .project to Public Works and the Downtown NET Office, the following comments were received: 1.. Pursuant to, the Department of Public Works, the project requires plans -for proposed ,sidewalk- and swale area improvements prior to the issuance of a building permit; and . 2. Pursuant to the Downtown NET Office, the, applicant shall submit a parking plan for construction employees; including an operational plan for construction activity and enforcement; said. parking plan shall be subject to the review and approval by. the ,Department of Planning and Zoning prior to the issuance of any building permits.' • It is.found.that, as a phased development project, it is difficult, if not impossible, for the developer to anticipate levels of .actual future development and as traffic impacts associated with such development. In order to adequately ensure that adverse impacts to the area will not occur, the Planning and Zoning Department would recommend that a condition be added to this development order which requires the applicant to conduct updated traffic studies prior to .obtaining building permits for each subsequent phase of this. project. The -subject traffic studies . should include recommendations for mitigation, including signalization options for the area... . • It is found that the Department of Planning and Zoning is in concurrence with these comments (with the exception of a mandatory review of final design by UDRB, which shall be at the discretion of the Planning and Zoning Director) and will require compliance with the above referenced conditions prior to the issuance of any building permits for the proposed project. • It is found that with -respect to all additional criteria as specified in Section 1305 of Zoning Ordinance 11000, the proposal has been reviewed and found to be adequate. Based on these findings, the Department of Planning and Zoning is recommending approval of the requested. Development Project with the following. conditions: 1. The approval of this Major Use Special Permit shall be subject to the recordation of the following :documents prior to the issuance. of shell permits for the proposed project: - a. Unity of Title or covenant in lieu thereof providing that the ownership, operation and maintenance of all common. areas and facilities will be by the property owner or a mandatory property owner association in perpetuity or completion of the State of Florida condominium process which assures the same compliance. r • n b. Development Order specifying that the Development Order runs with the land and is binding on the Applicant, it successors and assigns, jointly or severally. 2. Pursuant to the Department of Public Works, the project requires plans for proposed sidewalk and swale area improvements (including implementation of the Burle Marx plan for Biscayne Boulevard) prior to the issuance of a building permit. 3. Pursuant to the Fire and GSA Departments, the roof area of the proposed structure shall be made available to the City of Miami for any necessary communications equipment at no charge to the City. 4. The applicant shall submit a parking plan for construction employees, including an operational plan for construction activity and enforcement; said parking plan shall be subject to the review and approval by the Department of Planning and Zoning prior to the issuance of any building permits. 5. The applicant shall keep the Dade County archeologist apprised of all ground disturbing activity; based upon his findings, some level of monitoring by a private archeological consultant may be required. 6. Pursuant to the condition from the UDRB and staff review, the APPLICANT shall submit final design details, including materials, color schemes, and final landscape and lighting plan, to the Director of the Panning and Zoning Department for review and approval, prior to the issuance of a building permit; plans shall also include final design and landscape details for the river and bay walks. 7. Prior to the issuance of a shell permit, the APPLICANT shall submit an interim plan, including a landscape plan, which addresses design details for the land occupying Phase II of this project in the event that the future phase is not developed; said plan shall include a proposed timetable and shall be subject to review and approval by the Director of the Planning and Zoning Department. 8. The applicant shall conduct updated traffic studies prior to obtaining building permits for each future phase of this project. The subject traffic studies should include recommendations for mitigation, including signalization options for the area. 9. This approval shall also be subject to all additional conditions as specified in the attached Development Order. ®U-1137 RESOLUTION PAB -72-00 A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A SUBSTANTIAL MODIFICATION TO THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT FOR THE ONE MIAMI PROJECT, LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY 205 BISCAYNE BOULEVARD IN ORDER TO ALLOW THE DEVELOPMENT OF PHASE I OF THE PROJECT, CONSISTING OF A 34-STORY, 623,348 SQUARE FEET OFFICE TOWER; A 49-STORY, 425 RESIDENTIAL UNIT APARTMENT BUILDING WITH RELATED AMENITIES, AND A 12-STORY PARKING GARAGE WHICH WILL INCLUDE 1,834 PARKING SPACES, SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS AS SPECIFIED BY STAFF AND SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS: 1) IF A DOCK IS NOT CONSTRUCTED, A RAILING OF SOME SORT (TO BE APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT) SHALL BE PROVIDED, AND 2) APPLICANT SHALL WORK WITH THE PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT TO SUBMIT RESULTS OF A LABORATORY TEST REGARDING ARCHEOLOGY, WITHIN 90 DAYS OF ISSUANCE OF THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER. HEARING DATE: November 15, 2000 ITEM NO.: 8 VOTE: 6-1 ATTEST. a Gelabert-Sanch irecior Planning and Zoning Department 0O-1137 COLLEGE SQUARE.I .. 1 a r e s+ s ?NTER SUB 1 1 N '' UB. I %is 2s 2 ST a re 00o 0 0 w e e 4 ) 2 • e 7• e 4 s 2 f. 7 6 0 4 T i N 4 < N 5 s Is Is 17 is to a I. a to 17 1e is I W O lal O o • 7 4 S 2 1 Z • • T• ! 4 ] 2 1 Z • .@ 7 1, e 4 2 2 1 N 3 116 1 T Njig W 1 p IS Ie 17 le 10 12 I7 14 13 ee 17 q 19 1 12 13 14 10 IT 1 It = e e J m FLAGLER ST. o 000wo 0000c000 0000 • e+ s z .7 r e r e N • 3 2 1 n p L i CNANEER �70 > SUB. I2 ID N1e I• i7 Ie H [j,7R4C7a' t a 0 SL MCI 0 000000000000000�0 00000000000000eoo e 4 J 2 f! 7 e 4] 2 O + 12 17 1! 19 1 J2 1114 126 17 1t 19 �7 ,1, `ryt eA . 2o° 0 o 7-pp. S T. W trIl A' 000 0 0 000 00 N A ! r. `.�Q N e 7 e S 14 1! 12 1110 • env G< 0 4 5 s s_ s z ze zs t,PJ.tQ,F '1 z s 4 I z s+ s I s I 7 8 a SE' p5 MIAMI CONVENTION IT le • ��' CENTER g p� AMENDED oo TRACT'C' �0000000 rlel I ,./s• e r Is 1 s W 2 Vs BISCAYNE NOULE�fARD WAY IL A LB C ui I Ci 00000000 00000 BR/�EC PoSD'5 V 7- 1 1 s 6 i e ,p e S. L'i, BRIC e 7 4 N.. 0 KF, �.— � N „ C eR/CK"` 1 ,e o° 40o,7,oN, 4 8 a " ° _ W o s/V4Sy x r s ER IS I4 1ar le y , .O OI, B.y _ = is 0 14' mV o TRgCr SVe $T . D BRICKELL KEY ON CLAUGHTON ISLAND SECTION 3 8 TRACT G Pnfi�Ei �' 0 00-11 it TRACT 'H' IG, SECTION 2 TRACT 'E' tON TRACT ' S' R .4 SECTION 1 TRACT 'A' / TRACT 'F' pN nJvict'o- 15LP"I'l CITY OF MIANTI PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPLICATION FOR. MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT fi IS INI'ET W THAT MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMITS BE REQUIRED WHERE SPECIFIED USES AND/OR OCCUPANCIES INVOLVE MATTERS DEEMED TO BE OF CITYWIDE OR AREA -WIDE IMPORTANCE. THE CITY COMMISSION SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR DETERMINATIONS ON APPLICATIONS FOR MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMITS. (SEE AR77CLE 17 OF ORDINANCE 11000. ASAMENDED. 711E ZONING ORDINANCE OF 771E CTIYOFAOAAa, FLORIDA.) THE CITY COMMISSION SHALL REFER ALL APPLICATIONS FOR MAJOR USE SPECIAL PFR&II75 TO THE PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD AND TO THE DIRECTOR OF THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT FOR RECOMMENDATIONS, AND MAY MAKE REFERRALS TO AGENCIES, BODIES, OR OFFICERS, ETI' m THROUGH THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT OR DIRECTLY, FOR REVIEW, ANALYSIS AND/OR TECHNICAL FINDINGS AND DETERMINATIONS AND REPORTS THEREON. (SEE SEC770Y 1301.5 OF ORDINANCE 11000, AS AAWVDED, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CIIYOFMIAMI. FLORMA.) SECTION 2-653 OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, AS AMENDED, GENERALLY REQUIRES ANY PERSON WHO RECEIVES COMPENSATION, RaALINERATION OR MWENSES FOR CONDUCTING LOBBYING ACA MISS TO REGMTER AS A LOBBYIST WITH TIM CITY CLERK, PRIOR TO ENGAGING IN LOBBYING ACTIVITIES BEFORE C[IY STAFF. BOARDS, COI►UIIT M AND TIM CITY COhW=ON. A COPY OF SAID ORDINANCE IS AVAILABLE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK (MAN CITY HALL}, LOCATED AT 3500 PAN AMERICAN DRIVE, MIMII. FLARIDA. 33133. NOM 77ILSAPPLICA77ONMUST BE TYPE*W7TENAND SIGNED INBLAC M I, L u c i- a A. Dougherty, o n. be' h a L f o f *hereby apply to the Director of the Planning Department of the City of Miami for approval of a Major Use Special Permit under the provisions of Article 17 of the City of Miami Zoning Ordinance. *The ReLa.ted croup of Florida, contract purchaser and Miami Property Address: One Centre, L.P. owner 05 South RicraYrte Rcul:_awnrd Nature of proposed use (be specific): A request for an amendment to a p r-i o r approved Major Use SoeciaL Permit whirh was gran+org h;c th,- rit4. Cammission DLrSLant to ResoLution No. 98-1151. See attached Exhibit "1" for the Zoning Writ�—Uo. APPLICATION MATERIALS I attach the following in support and explanation of the application: 1. Two original surveys, prepared by a State of Florida Registered band Surveyor within one year from the date of application. 2. Affidavit disclosing ownership of property covered by application and disclosure of interest form (attach forms 4-83 and 4a-83 to- application). 00-1137 PPLICATION MATERIALS (continuedj' h the following in support and explanation of the application: 3. Certified list of owners of real estate within a 375-foot radius from the outside boundaries 'of property (attach form 6-83 to application). 4. Maps of the: a) Existing zoning designation. b) Adopted comprehensive plan designation for areas on and around the property. 3 5. General location map showing relation to the site or activity to. major streets, schools, existing utilities, shopping areas, important physical features in and adjoining the project,. and the like. 7 6. Concept Plan a) Site plan and relevant information per Section 1304.2.id-h. b) Relationships to surrounding existing and proposed futures uses and activities, systems and facilities, per Section 1762.3.2a. _ c) How concept affects existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan principles and designations; tabulation of any required variances, special permits, changes of zoning or exemptions,' per Section 1702.3.2b. 1 7. Developmental Impact Study (an application for development approval for a'Development of Regional Impact may substitute). 8. Other (be specific): 9. Fee of $ 45,000 for the Major Use Special Permit, based on current fee schedule as set forth in Chapter 62 of the Code of the City of Miami, as'amended. 10. Additional fee of $ —0— for any required special permits, changes of zoning or variances set forth in chapter 62 of the Code of the City of Miami, as amended. _ )tat Fee: $ 45,000 Signature Name Lucia A. Dougherty Address 1221 Bri cke L L Avenue, Miami, F L Phone/Fax Date SpptgamhPr % 7nnn APPROVAL OF THIS APPLICATION FOR MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT SHALL CONSIST OF AN EXECUTED RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COMMISSION AND A DEVELOPMENT ORDER ATTACHED THERETO WHICH SPECIFIES THE CONDITIONS UNDER WHICH THIS USE SPECIAL PERMIT APPLICATION IS APPROVED; IF APPROVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION, SAID RESOLUTION AND _LOPMENT ORDER SHALL, UPON EXECUTION THEREOF, BE TRANSMITTED TO. THE OWNER, OR AUTHORIZED AGENT AT TI M )RES&SPECIFIED ABOVE. ZONING FACT SHEET Case Number: 2000-0380 16-Oct-00 Location: Approx. 205 S. Biscayne Blvd. Item No: 5 Legal: (Complete legal description on file with the Office of Hearing Boards) Applicant: Miami One Centre, LP, Owners & Lucia Dougherty, Esq. The Related Grp.of FL 1221 Brickell Avenue 1221 Brickell Avenue Miami, FL 33131 Miami, FL 33131 App. Ph: (305) 579-0603 Rep. Ph: (305) 579-0683 ext Rep. Fa (`) = ext Zoning: CBD Central Business District Request: Special Exceptions as part of a Major Use Special Permit for One Miami, as listed in Ordinance No. 11000, as amended, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Article 9, Section 917.1.2, Valet Parking, generally, to allow valet parking for restaurant up 50% of existing off-street parking spaces and per Article 4, Section 401, Schedule of District Regulations, to allow bar/lounge open to the public within the CBD District. Purpose: This will allow a substantial modification to a previously approved Major Use Special Permit. Recommendations: Planning Department: Approval with conditions Public Works: No comments Plat and Street Committee: N/A Dade County Transportation: No comments Enforcement History, If any C.E.B. Case No: N/A Last Hearing Date: Found: N/A Violation(s) Cited: N/A Ticketing Action: N/A Daily Fine: $0.00 Affidavit Non -Compliance Issued on: Warning Letter sent on: Total Fines to Date: $0.00 Lien Recorded on: CEB Action: History: Analysis: Please see attached. Zoning Board Resolution No.: ZB 2600-0369 Zoning Board: Approval with.conditions Comply Order by: Q31� Vote: 7-0 Analysis for Special Exceptions for the ONE MIAMI Located at approx. 205 S. Biscayne Boulevard CASE NO. 2000-0380 Pursuant to Ordinance 11000, as amended, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, the subject proposal for One Miami Project has been reviewed to allow the following Special Exceptions: • Special Exception per Article 6, Section 607 to allow a Bar/lounge open to the public within the CDB District; • Special Exception per Article 9, Section 917.2.1 to allow valet parking for restaurant up to 50% of the existing off-street parking spaces. The requested Special Exceptions are for the purpose of allowing the One Miami Project, a mixed use development consisting of a total of 425 units, 707,025 square feet of office building and 1,834 parking garage for the property located at 205 S. Biscayne Blvd. within the CBD area (see attached legal description, location maps and aerial photographs for exact property boundaries). Note: These Special Exceptions also encompasses the following subordinate permits: 1. Class II Special Permit as per Article 15, Section 1511, for any development between Biscayne Bay and first dedicated right-of-way. 2. Class II Special Permit as per Article 4, Section 401, for temporary construction fence and covered walkway. 3. Class II Special Permit asper Article 4, Section 401, for development of new construction within the CBD District. 4. Class II Special Permit per Article 9, Section 908.9, for development on Biscayne Boulevard. 5. Class II Special Permit as per Article 9, Section 908.2 for access from public street roadway width greater than 25 feet. 6. Class II Special Permit as per Article 15, Section 1512, waiver of Guides and Standards, for 5 feet driveway from property line. 7. Class I Special Permit for aviation hazard, FAA clearance approval. required (Article 9, Section 915.2). 8. Class I Special Permit as per Article 9, Section 906.6, for pool/outdoor recreation area. 9. Class I Special Permit as per Article 9, Section 917.2.1, to allow valet parking for residential and other uses. 10. Class I Special Permit as per Article 9, Section 925.3.8, to allow development/construction/rental signage. 0-,17 11. Class I Special Permit as per Article 9, Section 918.2, for parking and staging of construction. 12. Class I Special Permit as per Article 9, Section 920.1, to allow construction trailer. The following findings have been made: • It is found that the proposed mixed -use development project will benefit the Downtown District by. creating new residential and office uses along Biscayne Boulevard along with further enhancing the bay walk from Bayfront Park to the mouth of the Miami River and beyond in Downtown. • It is found that the subject of these Special Exceptions, specifically a Bar/Lounge.and Valet Service for restaurant up to 50% of existing off-street parking spaces, for the proposed project, are completely within the scope and character of the project given . that it is a high density mixed -use residential project to be located along a significant parcel along Biscayne Boulevard corridor of Downtown Miami. • It is found that with respect to all additional criteria as specified in Section 1305 of Zoning Ordinance 11000, the proposal has been reviewed and found to be adequate. Based on these .findings, the Planning and Zoning Department is recommending approval of the requested Mixed -Use Residential Development Project with the following conditions: 1- The applicant shall present all final design details, including color, material and final landscape plan for review and approval, by the Planning Director prior to he issuance of a building permit. 2- This approval shall be subject to all additional conditions specified in the, final development order of Major Use Special Permit for the project. u 04 Miami Zoning Board Resolution: ZB 2000-0369 Monday, October 16, 2000 Mr. Juvenal Pina offered the following Resolution and moved its adoption Resolution: AFTER CONSIDERING THE FACTORS SET FORTH IN SECTION 1305 OF ORDINANCE 1.1000, THE ZONING BOARD GRANTED THE SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS AS PART OF A MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT FOR ONE MIAMI, AS LISTED IN ORDINANCE 11000, AS AMENDED, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, ARTICLE 9, SECTION 917.1.2, VALET PARKING, GENERALLY, TO ALLOW VALET PARKING FOR RESTAURANT UP TO 50% OF EXISTING OFFSTREET PARKING SPACES AND PER ARTICLE 4, SECTION 401, SCHEDULE OF DISTRICT REGULATIONS, TO ALLOW A BAR/LOUNGE OPEN TO THE PUBLIC WITHIN THE CBD DISTRICT FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY 205 SOUTH BISCAYNE BOULEVARD, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS ALL OF TRACT A, ONE MIAMI PARCEL A (155-80), PUBLIC RECORDS OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA; ZONED CBD CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT. THESE SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS WERE GRANTED FOR TWENTY-FOUR MONTHS IN WHICH A BUILDING PERMIT MUST BE OBTAINED, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT: 1) THE APPLICANT SHALL PRESENT ALL FINAL DESIGN DETAILS, INCLUDING COLOR, MATERIAL AND FINAL LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE PLANNING DIRECTOR PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT, AND 2) THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE SUBJECT TO ALL ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS AS SPECIFIED IN THE FINAL DEVELOPMENT ORDER OF MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT FOR THE PROJECT. Upon being seconded by Mr. Charles J. Flowers, the motion was passed and adopted by the following vote: Mr. George Barket Ms. Gloria M. Basila Mr. Rodolfo De La Guardia Mr. Charles J. Flowers Ms. Ileana Hemandez-Acosta Mr. Humberto J. Pellon Mr. Juvenal Pina Mr. Ricardo D. Ruiz Mr. Angel Urquiola Mr. Georges Williams Ms. Fernandez: Motion carries 7-0 Away Yes Yes Yes Yes Away Yes Away Yes Yes AYE: 7 NAY: 0 ABSTENTIONS: 0 NO VOTES: 0 ABSENTS: 3 Case No.: 2000-0380 Item Nbr: 0, 0 Miami Zoning Board Resolution: ZB 2000-0369 Monday, October 16, 2000 'eresita L. Fernandez, Chief Office of Hearing Boards Case No.: 2000-0380 Item Nbr: 5 ®®-1137 CITY OF MIAMi OFFICE OF HEARING BOARDS APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTION ANY'PERSON WHO RECEIVES COMPENSATION, REMUNERATION OR EXPENSES FOR CONDUCTING LOBBYING ACTIVITIES TO REGISTER AS A LOBBYIST WITH THE CiTY CLERK, PRIOR TO ENGAGING IN LOBBYING ACTIVITIES BEFORE CiTY STAFF, BOARDS, COMMITTEES AND THE CiTY COMMISSION. A COPY OF SAID ORDINANCE IS AVAILABLE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK (MIAMI CiTY HALL), LOCATED AT 3500 PAN AMERICAN DRIVE, MIAMi, FLORIDA, 33133. NOTE. THIS APPLICATION MUST BE TYPEWRITTEN AND SIGNED IN BLACK iNK. iT WILL BE ACCEPTED BY THIS OFFICE ONLY THE FIRST SEVEN (7) DAYS OF THE MONTH. APPLICANTS ARE RESPONSIBLE, IF NEEDED, TO BRING AN INTERPRETER FOR THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE TO ANY PRESENTATION BEFORE ANY BOARD OR COMMITTEE AND THE CITY COMMISSION. Within the City generally, or within certain zoning districts, certain structures, uses, and/or occupancies specified in this ordinance are of a nature requiring special and intensive review to determine whether or not they should be permitted in specific locations, and if so, the special limitations, conditions, and safeguards which should be applied as reasonably necessary promote the general purposes of this Zoning Ordinance and, in particular, to protect adjoining properties and the neighborhood from avoidable potentially adverse effects. It is further intended that the expertise and judgment of the Zoning Board be exercised in making such determinations, in accordance with. the rules, considerations and limitations relating to Special Exceptions (see Article 16 of the Zoning Ordinance). Formal public notice and hearing is mandatory for Special Exceptions. The Zoning Board shall be solely responsible for determinations on applications for. Special Exceptions except when otherwise provided for in the City Code. All applications shall be referred to the Director of the Planning and Zoning Department for his recommendations and the Director shall make any further referrals required by these regulations. Lucia A. Dougherty, on behalf of The 4eLat.ed Group of Florida, I, contract purchaser and Miami One Centre, L.P., owner hereby apply to the City of Miami Zoning Board for approval of a Special Exception for the property located at 20.5 South B:i s c a y n e B o u l e v a r d folio number p i— n 1 i 4- n 7 n-1 n 41 Nature of proposed use (please be specific): See attached Exhibit "1" In support of this application, the following materials are submitted: 1. Two original surveys of the property prepared by a State of Florida Registered Land Surveyor within one year from the date of application. 2. Four copies -signed and sealed by a State of Florida Registered Architect or Engineer of site plans showing (as required) property boundaries, existing (if any) and proposed structure(s), parking, landscaping, etc.; building elevations and dimensions and computations of lot area and building spacing. 06-11'a 7 3. Plans need to be stamped by the Office of Hearing Boards and signed by Public Works, Zoning and Planning prior to submission of application. 4. One (1) 8 Y2 x 11 copy of the signed plans attached to this, application. 5. Affidavit and disclosure of ownership of property covered by applications and disclosure of interest from attached to this application. 6. Certified list of owners of real estate within a 375-foot radius of .the outside boundaries of property covered by the application. 7. At least two photographs that show the entire property (land and improvements). 8. Recorded warranty deed and tax forms for the most current year available that show the present owner(s) of the property. 9. Other (Specify and attach cover letters explaining why any document you are attaching is pertinent to this application): 10. Cost of processing according to Section 62-156 of the Zoning Ordinance: Special exception $ 800.00 Special exception requiring. automatic city commission review . $ 2,000.00 Extension of time for special exception $ 500.00 Public hearing mail notice fees, including cost of handling and mailing per notice $: 3.50 Surcharge.equal to applicable fee from item above, not to exceed eight hundred dollars ($800.00) except from agencies of the city; such surcharge to be refunded to the applicant if there is no appeal from a property owner within three hundred and seventy-five (375) feet of the subject property. Signature Lucia A. Dougherty Name Address j'?21 6ri ckeL L Avenue__ Miami, FLorida 33131 Telephone (305) 579=0603 Date 2 September 7, 2000 STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of S e p t e m b e r 20 00 by Lucia A. Dougherty who is personalty known to me or who has produced as identification and who did (did not) take an oath. Name: Not ry a Co ION OF FLMMA My 0 MissaonT,��Pn 4 ,-17nm STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20 , by of a corporation, on behalf of the corporation. He/She is personally known to me or has produced as identification and who did (did not) take an oath. Name: Notary Public -State of Florida Commission No.: My Commission Expires: STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20 , by partner (or agent) on behalf of , a partnership. He/She is personally known to me or who has produced as identification and who did (did not) take an oath. Name: Notary Public -State of Florida Commission No.: My Commission Expires: 3 0 0 - i AFFIDAVIT l Before me, the undersigned authority, this day personally appeared Lucia A. Dougherty who being by me first duly, swom, upon oath; deposes, and says:' 1. That he/she is the owner, or the legal representative of the owner, submitting the ' accompanying application for a public hearing as required by Chapter 55 of the Code of the City of Miami, Florida, affecting the real property located in the City of Miami, as described and listed on the pages attached to this affidavit and made apart thereof. 2. That all owners which he/she represents, if any, have given their full and complete permission for him/her to actin his/her behalf for the change°'or modification of a classification or regulation of zoning as set out in the accompanying petition. 3. That the pages attached hereto and made a part .of this affidavit contain the current names,_ mailing addresses, telephone numbers and legal descriptions for the real property of: which he/she is the owner or legal.representative. 4. The facts as represented in the application and documents submitted in conjunction with this affidavit are true and correct. Further Affiant sayeth not. Applicant's Signatu e STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE The foregoing instrument was ack owledged before me this day of2� 20 60 , by who is ersonally known to me or who has produced as identification and who did (did not) take an oath. My Commission Expires: io 14 UU to t OWNER'S LIST ' 'sName Miami One Centre, C.P. rta,�Address 5000 Blue Lake Drive, Boca Raton, F Zip Code 33431 "elephone Number (5 61) 9 9 8- 9 2 0 0 .egal Description: See attached Exhibit " 2" UWC4 Name Tailing Address Zip Code 'elephone Number egal Description: �wner's Name [ailing Address Zip Code el-. to Number gal Description. ny other real estate property owned individually, jointly, or severally (by corporation, partnership or privately) within 15 feet of the subject site is listed as follows: Street Address Street Address Street Address Legal Description See attached Exhibit "4" Legal Description Legal Description 06-113 OWNER'S LIST ,• .o.'s Name via. Address Zip Code 'elephone Number .egal Description: pp Licant`s, X rgName The Related, Grour) of F L o r i d a sailing Address > 2? C as L k a y t r1 i a m i. F' L o r i d a Zip Code 331 �• S elephone Number egal Description: wner's Name [ailing Address Zip Code ;. - .e Number :gal Description: .iy other real-estate property owned individually, jointly, or severally (by corporation, partnership or privately) within 'S feet of the subject site is listed as follows: Street Address Legal Description Street. Address Legal Description Street Address . Legal Description ®37 . ,. DISCLOSURE OF OWNERSHIP 1. Legal description and street address of subject real property: 205 South Biscayne Boulevard See attached Exhibit "2" for legal description 2. Owner(s) of subject real property and percentage of ownership. Note: Section 2-618 of the Code of the City of Miami requires disclosure of ail parties having a financial interest, either direct or indirect, in the subject matter of a presentation, request or petition to the City Commission. Accordingly, question #2 requires disclosure of shareholders of corporations, beneficiaries of trust, and/or any other interested parties, together with their addresses and proportionate interest. See attached Exhibit "3". 3. Legal description and street address of any real property (a) owned by any party listed in answer to question #2, and (b) located within 375 feet of the subject real property. See attached Exhibit "4". Owner or Attomey for/owner Lucia A. Dougherty STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2000 by Lucia A. Dougherty who is personally known to me or who Ms produced as identification and who did (did not) take an oath. Name: Notary P° Commiss on Nom-Al?" rn My Com d ' ,'' r2s' ,AIM OF FWRmA NO. CC77iM 40-- 10 � �nrb�t2 ONE MIAMI CBD/CENTRAL.BUSINESS DISTRICT Per City Code, Chapter 36. Construction Equipment : Request for waiver of noise ordinance while under construction for continuous pours. Per City code, `Chapter 23-5a, Request fpr a Certificate of Appropriateness for ground disturbing activity in an Archeological Conservation Area. MUSP; per Article 17 for development of 425 residential units. MUSP, per Article 17 for a parking structure of 1834 parking spaces. MUSP, as per Article 17, for nonresidential uses involving an excess of 626,227 square. feet floor area ratio. Special Exception as Article 9, Section 917.1.2, to allow valet parking for restaurant up '50% of existing off-street parking spaces. . Special Exception as per Article 4, section 401, to allow bar/lounge open to the public within the CBD District. Class II Special Permit as per Article 15; Section 1511,.for any development between Biscayne Bay and the first dedicated right-of-way. Class II Special Permit as per Article. 4, Section 401, for temporary construction fence and covered walkway. Class II Special Permit as per Article 4, Section 401, for development. of new construction within the CBD Distrcit. Class II Special Permit per Article 9, section 908.9, . for development on Biscayne Boulevard. Class II Special Permit'as per Article 9, Section 908.2, for access from a public street roadway width greater than 25 feet. Class II Special Permit as per Article 15, Section 1512, waiver of Guides and. Standards and guidelines, for 5 feet driveway from property line. Class I Special Permit as per Article 9, Section 915.2, for FAA clearance letter. QU--1137 0 .0 Class I Special Permit as per Article 9, Section 906.6, for pool/outdoor recreation area. Class I Special Permit as Article 9, Section Section 917.2.1,. to allow valet parking for residential and other uses. Class I Special Permit as per Article 9, Section 925.3.8, to allow development/construction/rental signage. Class I Permit as per Article 9, Section 918.2, for parking and staging of construction during construction. Class I Permit as per Article 9, Sectionction 920.1, to allow construction trailer. Request for the following MUSP conditions to be required at time of shell permit instead of at issuance of foundation permit: a. The requirement to provide a letter of assurance for the Solid Waste Department; and b. The requirement to record in the Public Records a Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions providing that the ownership, operation and maintenance of all common areas and facilities will be by the property owner or a mandatory property owner association; and c. The requirement to record in the Public Records a unity of title or covenant in lieu of unity of title. Designation as a phased development pursuant to Section 2502 of Ordinance No.11000. Request for waiver of Waterfront Charter permission per section 3(mm) (iii) of the Charter. J y e McPhee Zoning Inspector II Date QO-1 �'��' 0 . 0 Exhibit "2" All of Tract A, ONE NHANff PARCEL A, recorded in Plat Book 155 at Page 1 80, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida. o nU— ® Exhibit "3" Disclosure of Ownership for Miami One Centre, L.P. 1 Miami One Centre, L.P. - Owner Miami One Holdco, Ltd. owns 33% NLS Miami Partners owns 33% M.L. Stoltz Miami Partners. owns . 18.415% BFMC Investment, L.L.C. owns 14.585% Miami One Centre, Inc. owns 1 % 100% Miami One Holdco, Ltd. - is owned 100% by Larry DeGeorge, individually. NLS Miami Partners - is owned 52.62% by Ned Siegel - and no other parties own 5% or greater. M.L. Stoltz Miami Partners - is owned 100% by Skip Stoltz, individually. BFMC Investment, L.L.C.- is owned 100% by Barry Florescue, individually. MIAMI/PARDOA/1168128/p 1c001!.DOC/8/30/00/99999.45M 1 00--1137 . Exhibit 44319 OWNERSHIP STRUCTURE ENTrrY The Related Group of Florida A Florida General Partnership General Partner - Related Florida, Ltd. 50.500/0 Limited Partner - Related General ofFlorida, Ltd. 49.500/0 NTI Related Florida, Ltd. A Florida Limited Partnership Corporation General Partner - Related Florida, Inc. Limited Partner - Jorge M. Perez 99.00�/a Related Florida, Inc. A 1=lorida Corporation Jorge M. Perez - 100% Shareholder _ Officers: Jorge M. Perez - President Roberto S. Rocha . - Senior Vice President Angel A. Hernandez - Assistant Secretary 2828 Coral Way - Penthouse Miami, Florida 33145 (305) 460-9900 ENTITY Related General of Florida Ltd. A Florida Limited Partnership General Partner - RCMP,' Inc. 1.006/0 Litnited Partner - The Related Companies, L.P. 99.00% Officers: Stephen'M. Ross - President James Flood - Executive Vice President Susan J. McQuire - Secretary 625 Madison Avenue New York, New York 10022 (2I2) 421-5333 � �: ` 7 mow- 0 Exhibit " RCMP. Inc. 100.00% Related Companies L.P. OFFICERS: Stephen M. Ross, President Michael Brenner, Executive Vice President Susan McGuire, Secretary. Michael J. Wechsler, Treasurer The Related Companies L.P. 1.00%GP_ The Related Realty Group, Inc. 64.7%Ltd. Stephen M. Ross 24.50/oLtd. Outside Investors (see attached list) 9.80%Ltd. Jorge M. Perez Total 100.00% Related Companies L.P. Outside Investors Stephen M. Ross Susan Snider Deborah Williams Jorge M. Perez Trust for Morris Ginsberg Estate for Calmon Ginsburg James Snider 19871RR Ins. Tr. Tn2st for Daniel Ginsberg Trust for Laurie Rudey Laurie Rudey Trust for Donald Ginsberg Rona Jaffe Trust for Elsie Robinson Louis Weinberg Andrew Augenblick Estate of Daniel Ginsberg Donald Ginsberg Estate of Morris Ginsberg Calmon Ginsberg GO-11907 Exhibit "4" Miami Orre Centre, L.P. is the owner of, the following: Project Legai Description Parcel i3 All of Block 3, DU PONT PLAZA, according .to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 50, Page 11, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. Parcel C . Lots 1 through 8, both inclusive, Block 2, DU PONT PLAZA, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 50, Page 11, of the. Public Records of Dade .County, Florida. Parcel D All of Block 4, DU PONT PLAZA. :cording to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 50, Page 11, of the Public ,Records c c Dade County, Florida. • 1g99 NOV! B PH T; Q5 °' R r-. 0920 S.EECUL WAHUM 12EED AEC 18341 Pt; Z334 TMS INDENTURE, made tws"L day of199.E by MIAMQ CEN-MFL 10MY Vr:MTMF, a Florida general partnership having an address at cio World F=- ncial Properties, L P , One Liberty Plaza, New York. New York 10006 {•Grantor''), in favor of Mine( One Centre Leaned Partnership psrteerAlrlp a Florida halted Road 0110). Rota Raton* Florida 33431 having an address at 301 Yaoata ("Grantee'). VMNESSE'Iif, that Grantor, for and in consideration of the sure of Ten Dollars (Sl0 00) in hand ptid and other good and valuable consideration. the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby uknowltdged, by these presaus does GRANT, SELL and CONVEY unto Granter, its succmr9 and assigns tke following described real property: aeits that certain tract of land locoed in Dade County, Florida and being nacre particularly descnUd on Schedule A attached hereto and trade a part Hereof, together with all . improvemer u, buildings. or fixtures situated or located thereon, and all appurtenant rights. privileges or easements belonging or in any way relating thereto, including but not limited to. all interest, if any. of Grantor in any lead lying in or under the bed of any highway, avenue, street, read, alley, easetaw or tight-flf--way, open or proposed, in, on, across, abutting or ad ==t to the property descnbtd on Sebedule A hereto. together with all of Grantor's right. title sad interest to any strips and gates within or bounding the property (ail of said property and interest being collccriveJy referred to herein as the "Property"). TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the Property, together with any and all the rights and appurtenances thereto in anywise belonging to Grantor_ unto Grantee, its successors and assigns. FORCVM Grantor. for itself and its su censors, does covenant, grornise and agree. to and with Grantee that Gramm has ant done or suffered to be dam anything whereby the Property hereby gruttod is, or may bq in any manner cucambeard or charged. subject, however, w all easements, covautms, agreemens, restrictions and reservations of record, if any. Grantor does hereby warrant and agree to defend title to the Property against the lawful claims of all persons claiming by. through orundaCrantor, but not otherwise, subject to alI casements, covenants. agseemems, restrictions and reaavariors of record, if any. T1%bWstttw= is executed and delivered pursuant to an Order Confirming ` Amended plan of ReotSwtimadon of Miami Center Joint Venture pursuant to Chapter 1 I of the United. Stares Saalauptcy Code (the "Order") dated September IS, 1997 of the United States 9w*mptcy Coutt, Southern District of X4 cw York (the 'Bankruptcy Court"), and enwed on September 19, 1997 on the docket in the ease ofla re Mami Center Sgint Venture_ Debtor Documentary S:ama: Co:teeeec $ L; l� SUF•TRX c•lrrP$4 nnr_ I"M7ie+oe; Class "C" Intanpibl� 1'rrz fgtl.Cc:l :: , `• _ �e:c.a� r py�y„1....; ;�qe _: ��c-Esaaz.•m-ra.+,err�....,..... _ -.]afar-•---•.+s: '� mart. ..;,� - - 1;-^::- •, _ s! ,!-.hit f» y:.lG_C�'�;.'�{�H^;Y.�.`.. iT; `..t'"..�,...•• - - ... _ •. _ � :.ij - .. � �::.::i��:?-• ..r_�_ •!._•, _ i.. - - � Z Il i r�`•t . y.._ Y•y ' II•Y.Sy 'j•} •_1.. ,'. •ti•l . •Ili ;••,. aw'.._I_ '. 'ill�b14!'�/.111�!i4iafar!:.!'.r•,�f.i �''c"v.%t.`rri ._..:. .1�i... .� _ _ _ ,• ,• ,r.., ��: �: t!r.r�_ __ r.. � .•..;..: ,..- .. -.�.a w_• _. .._..... .1..•..._w� I;"'fy,��/RyI�.. �.Ln I! . I S f If:�:lt di9 jPS�ii`'��,tia :•_l. _...� `.•_'!=. _'�'r�':.�.:: ��.�� 't^ ___.-�'`I:.: - :?^.:.:'f �� 'i•::T =:5':".J'di .tor•-se•+.�..:r .T:f..........-..--4 00 fir �E6 8341 tC 2335 . (Cl aV" 11 Cities No. 96 B 44892 (JLG)), Which Order provides for the ft-Usferof the said .- iu PMWA t ro this iastrMWWML ix WIT'1+1ESS WHEREOF. Griator has caused its castle to be signed to these' , Pr=v the day #s!d ycar first above wtitteu Witnessed: MIAhII CMim&10INT VENTURE BY: VM Florida Equity Corp., M Name. a LAI By: Gel By; ''GiLGC/� i r(%J1. L Partner /�,�� != riame: Tot,.,. By: �...� Title Tax PArcel LD. N=4 01 OI 14 030 1041 OI 0114030 1050 01 0114 030 1210 010114 030 1 I30 • After recording this doasmert should be rersstrted ra: - . • _� L�DOC3ti8TPu NY 113�'u�15�•03 lCVm " .. [ aJi tLY�'}i•p}P:• c:; icu�r:�-i `.� l.�r._.oirs ...: •..:� �7 fii::r:-`.,.'t'i`. +;.. i f Pl+I;4w�wC.r�:tyi ::� � .� ��.i,..r:.`c . =. •'� r -.�r � �•..•�•,«.emu •'_"• ::r. � %�:�1.�; ��-:-r t�.; r^. '•i.:r., F !rc . � . Lr. lib .r1...� -.v �V._:::.. .•-ir � • ._•-.�«,�.:• -. •,, i.^:'l1 ;•.: f.'wi �:'..' ..S—��:'^: :'.�. '1' . .. I I i � `•4�_A YC�?Iv::-.lfltiri�::.)�`', -`-n.lJ:�: •_ _3 �:-it.:.Zi'= �•r.�. a 'k ,•3��. �1 //! r�•:r . -.y �: � .. -•. _�...-. .ate ���: �, is_ .s 1 �: r-'y �e a. ,-�LN , {jp�i�� �yL �#r�yx,'••:� ��ti, „�..:t�-.v�.sti�,• �: �. w� � L. ! yrk r �� r' � ����7 F�^r^• F� r i � 1 IW � Ip _ 'r ' .ti ��'.. � �riir+-r+n:+.tM'-4r.+. �wr--Y.- �•-�rN+rwLV_+1si s - ..a ��- 7`i�.h ' e.- rt` fi•r,•Lr: :F':: _.:....; .J::.�.LL •., �' , :-�: �;; ' •'-�: �oz;,-. '�Y r'' '�`y,a�M'L,rJlS�1�'!J''��.lM�i1YgE�Ni'• �. Y4t4� .:: ^�-':IN ^y`-S2_^r+r .. '-Y '.,n..��tSi.L:«: �i^.Lr i::; +_yi �.,.�. .i•rry...y .�r.iP.. •,. A 1�• rri3t'PR 7,,,Siit • offs (UJ`F ! ►C 2336 STATE Of COUNTY OF n the ��ay of 4!!9e P&V 1997 before me pesonally came to me known, who being by me duly swom did depose and say he resides at �''s`Q K. �1., w.l" jks.0 f1.•d_ 'yi tr - , that he is the F--a� of WFF Florida Equity Corp.. the corporation which is described in and which awcuted the foregoing instrument: which corporation is the general pa.•tner of MMMi CENTER JOINT VCNTURE, the putnaship which executed the foregoing iastruauat; that the execution of the iasitu n nt. by WFP Florida i APuty Corp. was duly nthanmd aecortimS to the pamergtrip agreement of said partuaship; that the general partner executed the inq,snsnesu on behalf of the said partnership pursuant to said authorization and thu he knows the seal of said corporation; that the seal aRfxad to said instnuacnt is such corporate seal; that it was so affixed by authority ofrlte board of directars of said corporation, and that he signed his name thereto by like authority, Notary Pubes, 5tai- of NMe pE�,fatad�ttua s10 7tl�atasMs��,,� Namep:inted: - 4—ax a A�is�s..a.il (lgwn� Fawniea My Commisuoa Expires: titw�i :rl�'bi=cm..w Aii NON' �` fl•tl. t ZV • I Ifi1'f IIII d'i 1p:'tS4! .. t�. n n/„q14�n1•.t Ccmmission No.: =z% [NOTARIAL SEAL] Li rtnnesatsdi !ItY' \t3o�iissa.Qs -3- 10'1N7 �ry�,;, _ :I�ti... .fry °" :_:�'_ _ _._ _-.. .. ;: � :� �1; • '� pTy,�i• Sri• .i ^i�J � . a:,uc• - .. i �.:�... - _ .. -..�; � r� -✓ . �f � -, : d+:-li.;' -77 ::Ic'I`u.'."-,rf-t�,�i rs� ��,i*` ��T::.,' '.•;ti,t.-w.. ~:;,.�., - . r4T�,fn: �.>n';��{i,•.�}•'�q{ �1i1::�4,��.si:wr.•�ti>C :'.•nr1.i f.=..-^t.� ..'� .. - C•:.. .. _-::•.. 11d i�t�" 'jti a'ft�'•y1-•. 'r Cr �c'' �t'i:�• ^�;�:�: r�-k\.�.L '/.J�1:� M.v .f\S�O'.1.r �Mwl� _ '�I7•-•:LY'. `i �" _ .\•'•=•`� «_4 F�•�t II ''i; rl, tti�l ti I UU-1137 QFf CEt 18341 ?'037 S TIT R F d ' h LEGAL ESSCR,IPMON Loth I thru 6 Block 2. Lots I dint 14 Block 3. Lots I ChM 8 Stack 4 and Tr D Block I of l3upont Am, according to the Plat thereofss recorded in Plat Book 50, u Psge 11, ofthe Public Records of Dade Cosaty. Florida, LESS that portion of said Tract D des=%ed as follows_ Begin at the Northeast corner of said Traci D MW run West along the North line of Tract D for 645.94 feet to a Point of Cutvatum thence Southwesterly' along s oireutar carve to the left having a radius oli'25.00 f= 2nd a Conat angle of 61 degrees 26 minuta oo seconds for an are dtstmce of 26.81 feet to a Point of Compound Curvaatrr, thence Southerly along s Citrulas Cave to tine left. having a radios of 300.00 feet and'a central angle of 28 degrees 34 -iatttes 00 seconds far an are distance of 149.57 feet to a Point of TMXCW, the= South for 293.50 feet (said Isar awntioned four courses being Coincident with the boundary Lines of said Tract D); thence ease for 179.41 &m; thcom North for 150.00 feet; thence End for 525.36 feet; theme North 00 degrees 04 mhst s 07 se+eouds West along the last line of said Tract D for 300.00 feet to the Point of Bede ving _- es o.w cowry-. w�• scow snV4V. aar• j t,cocssirx_rnr u:a�cns�o�s - tatrsT 'I � � � 1 `F:'i':ti'i,'�`%S=Y�'.1..7 .'q�•..ir i ;�: F}i-•- _ _ : �� � :...�.'. _z: _ a . '��. i ��"s:ti!�.i'VCae•alas.,_zR'nl�e..�r^�q'_�_�:.:a C.: ��•1i,y 1 •y: .�-.=:..i-_.:.. :'�..t'rc. •i'- � !:,'a}1 "4_71 • _A•�v,. ,-ti t.,� ., .'... a .; • •; "` :. ,"n •' :•� � S' • I i,•i;i7:F:V�wl�styr�.'wr-ri .•�:r x:L'+ _?:i 1.•`•' • -t�r�-4•',.','�i`•_:; `r=...i,: .:phi.".;.•._ ,;ilp.i. ' �`i^.r.`•r.�'iw•.:iti�u7 i;�,�ii �.i+la_'°?_J _ r•.. •.i•Z,�=:o'.:.: `-'{ �L- .•i �• v _•t`. •,a r-�i•,^,�i 9ijJAISifRb1;��'►r+i= - _�%F. ;v `��:^i<,i>:'.�:;\. ..,_-^.:^, .a:-:S•. •: .. ;._,. �.,�.,y:;:�. �>_,�?-r1! _ JU I! � _- �' •.•C• l.(��r ors iT^�'�w�•�,' �•...,Jr •.Y•.•:n r'�i.1.-•`i`Igr1 . N4�w:.1�•+�!c'fr+-ri••w+•,•+�nt•..•-.._ 1 V' � � JL • r:::_. 4fla- A-41tIckell.44,7118, S116100 Miami Rama 33fif Phone.•.70f,371W2 fax.•30f.371.f17f Major Use Special Permit Submi6al uL September Ah., 2000. INDEX OF DRAWINGS September 71h., 2000 TITLE SHEET NIGHT PERSPECTIVE S1 SURVEY S2 SURVEY . 1.1.1 AT GRADE LANDSCAPE 1.1.2 AT GRADE LANDSCAPE L2 POOL LEVEL LANDSCAPE L3 LANDSCAPE DETAILS D1 MARGINAL DOCKING FACILITY-PLANBSECTION Cl PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN A1.0 DAYTIME PERSPECTIVE Ati SITE PLAN A1.2 OVERALL GROUND LEVEL PLAN All OVERALL MEZZANINE LEVEL_ PLAN A1A OVERALL PLAN ATLEVEL 3 A1.5 OVERALL PLAN AT LEVEL 4 A1.6 OVERALL LOW RISE 1 PKG LEVELS 5 TO A1.69 OVERALL LOW RISE I PKG LEVELS 8 TO 10 A1.7 OVERALL POOL LEVEL PLAN A1.8 OVERALL MID -RISE LEVELS PLAN All OVERALL HIGH-RISE LEVELS PLAN 410 OVERALLS" ELEVATION A1.11 OVERALL EAST ELEVATION A1.12 OVERALL CROSS SECTION EAST -WEST A2.1 OFFICE GROUND FLOOR PLAN • Bt A2.2 OFFICE MEZZANINE FLOOR PLAN - B2 A2.3 OFFICE MEP ISUPPORT FLOOR PLAN -B3 A2A OFFICE SUPPORT AT LEVEL 4.84 A2.5 OFFICE LOW RISE FLOOR PLAN AT PKG LEVELS 5 TO 7 A2.50 OFFICE LOW RISE FLOOR PLAN AT PK'G LEVELS 8 1010 A2.6 OFFICE LOW RISE FLOOR PLAN A2.7 OFFICE HIGH RISE FLOOR PLAN A2.8 OFFICE ROOF PLAN A2.9 OFFICE ELEVATIONS Ali RESIDENTIALIPKGGROUND FLOOR PLAN A32 RESIDENTIAL IPKGSECOND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN A3.3 RESIDENTIAL IPWGTHIRD LEVEL FLOOR PLAN A3.4 RESIDENTIALIPKGFLOOR PLAN LEVELS 4,586 A3.5 RESIDENTIAL IPWGFLOOR PLAN LEVELS Ah.TO136). A3.6 RESIDENTIAL POOL LEVEL FLOOR PLAN A3.7 RESIDENTIAL FLOOR PLAN LEVELS 151h. TO 42b). A3.8 RESIDENTIAL FLOOR PLAN LEVEL 431h. A3.9 RESIDENTIAL FLOOR PLAN LEVELS 441h.84506. A3A0 RESIDENTIAL FLOOR PLAN LEVELS 4664 TO 40. A3.11 RESIDENTIAL FLOOR PLAN LEVEL 401h. A3.12 RESIDENTIAL SOUTH ELEVATION A3.13 RESIDENTIAL NORTH ELEVATION A3.14 RESIDENTIAL EAST ELEVATION Aar Al wImna-silt Mr. THEAEL4M70 GROUP OfFLOR/0,4 2828Cb&Way PenMOM 7. AFiamlfb7da ,fbmq • .7 BOUNDARY AND WOVOGRAPIng NURVINY ONE ralAm. rAutclulu Im PLAT BOOK ISO, PAGE 80, MIAMI•DADE COUNTY RECORDS, LYING IN SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 54 SOUTH, I3�, RANGE 41 EAST, CITY OF MIAMI, MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA. - J,�__� `��_®___� �-' -- - WA•mrlFd[I�,otw,.DtOP • w w r----- *001 M.W. 1071A AV MtM MIAMI, M.OMDA pop:-ap07 woM spt 7np ''r ate; M Z. Al q r �_. J t.l i� J .. ' ] �a ,� ° -",�^ w- �a� �°�" d¢ �,�. b :m.an �.. �� :t �a � � � �`:. w•'^� R... .q[ , T :w11 [ n�'gRn M wain ;. �••' 1Q� -• T Y- •'"'• - fw r¢,arr lest. x� uR rues Yivarva .rta .r0 .iin rR,. �r[nq[t �uV��M r[P [a+on. rgbtn •Rio o�nn«[rtw`arv�K.,wrbr rt Kr•`b a`«i M own alsnsa MEW rnnmoa w rt E > aq r T.'vrO',r'.�wam' p MwrM. w. ,•rr! a nb wtei• w'•`,rq �1 Pr[i w Mnrdf, r.Ri•e LOCATIO mMAP; . ' aeger- wR I,nq a eR w rd M Rion P tma REVISED SURVEYORS REPORT •�•M", °.m ,,� R [ mr.� ARnCIEX ALTA/ACSM LAND TI UI8URVEY AND „ P.r r P naw d P.Pr. u neCA7E FEAIUEB ''BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY .. e � lw , ;: ARTICLE N DF LWATIOtO W d. a dD R . o .Pwa. w,rmo «. we o ,wi artmo-e wr Pe q �ae a ` a ro0°prFMO' e°Ni,u,°A�'. nw! R, a rnm I! M [am P er..on ruerycn, M „� n d ma rw] P ngnK ,w r.. [,err d ca ..uP mPm, tr P n n "ONE MIAMI PARCEL A' nett re:,dgw, d ,,. a1A[, .eavn M. M .ae ARTICLE %1 COY OF MIAMI, MIAMI•DADE COI1NiY, FLORIDA '""''."'0t®` �'rM. ,� _"• P ww «�• ^+�.a.dAc avert. q „ w r.. wmn1e R"OO"Kna rr.� R b a.aa.. d .w>osrn CUENT W-OWAATIOM - ARIICIF 1 ,er Rcem m.q .a..r ,wn ro e„a w® caom w rts,wcsxs>. ]atw,F wgA.wr,rc ww.tr qe M w.M. w .e Rran . . oEnmlols; oEneuun •q°Ww.'[]:ff, ..., rr .n ,n rdd :'Ir.e1Rt� .e' �`m - -nR.vw.v»w.+.":"p"[ + w M Pra P M -aArr nou ra a[ao'] P oI r,pp� . M Ow v M 1o+rogr •,o •Prrgon,,,,R ro ],rt w rde ry ¢vr rim w M RaC RevR P ta.l.wct m Pro �wr � RIIIaRv]i 0.FSY � m� Moe. wEt � MeO .rrwp K4.evun0 r[oi F Mmv. �¢drr. rise] nq.[ p . mrwn[ w] d en[Rn.ro. w wP q ro w. M fum .wo.m.. mem n ,,.rra. Oownn sRiLwlM nn P ,W . tpraw�tmgwmx P M n.n P nova /K orM`mi w •. wnuru,tair. [y Rtt wnR. ]FP. owr ¢6 m,' aaraf. P .rest .wl..rd do ARHCLE XII nrnan d w PaaaM+ �]. ,dr w tm.m n M .ePPn wR w, rP.em rfgi l,w.a..0 q wa. rr. [m rnePn !n w�"o�Pa www .[-[,t nt ]r/vbm A moK.r[ ¢jp FMt PPt wm] d w]nm M ae[v damn R4 rw. t¢um PUA Pr.•a lydri r.: M �YMp I:ERIFICAT6 . ,�,,, n fwoga ,] Wr o,n frPt ,rt touaa b � wot wo�.o. oo.w rw M a¢ ¢cuanw rw ,n][ nw a[.wam . rtRvrawAl WnaP ] M°"��rSe1i�`..t P M !+[ t . ARTICLE R MAP OF DOUNDAMND T0Y00M[Nc BMA'El] - >w¢� .+w.R""""U "M" ^ rt `"m "'O"w.°.�r A°"',.[ :dr.. rPeP„+[`t°r ;'•."',.to,,.m r',^`M['"""rP,a e°°:. �. � rPowr„c w....: qq M..,�F w w. lle,l[ w f„aav erR,a •b wa[ , Irn leRP F bgp4. M n,[ P dwngr P w munoe .nr ,v aewP � q rws rw aarRC M WM. P ,b tPMv. MS w'¢w.[. me wee. PTa w mgecro,.er we w d twat ][. Ad. angel rum-w .va Pa M rogm dPr P nPa . na.d tue,t .Rnms iw P wwP. w[,¢, M .mead qe mrgagrn a ro"n.`°¢ m,,:.,.rga n Ar �mtab d ate ..,,t r.6'"°a]:°`A`ewt pet- berg P,t taw+r¢ tarrq wR,r am.n °Or,[n w,'moR�irPi'6ni,w rc ,c¢'Riosa[i'q arena d M nP r,ewrot Toss. r.n.w d. wPn .Rufw..tc+m, rw. mdan-+vywr Md rban P rrMrl4Pn Iwr41 Mmwa M ftas, sgRq, n[R •cW ID q M lt4,ve 'P`drn+ew i¢,Hen.M a t— d M N2i w 4C M.,f1m A rr ¢rtu� wnWrt [6 wL. RS .t ai,PlY RV[r9ext ,MO Wna err w :vo m, M A,rt P clad r/ra trot. «m, oMwre[ wPa � w w ivmr q !r[ tw¢m, v u]MrK-r4GFe irlre0 P M rwv v rbY a I.aret nq w P f Wr MO IOMr ! rU�Pr i¢ro[o no RR,nim ,r¢ Imr dr P M� aW. M [OnA d M s,w.t. Mo W .e. ✓�4wm ro � PwF�,1s LLWu. aps wM1.iv w M Mrrrr Mo sort rrov[Lo. m dRF clelry FM ,LP[ plMm M MI[lor P 4 q,ppt4 b M 'arrl P W[Mn qq Ot¢Yreb1 P - µpm P r/ro roJr rd dN4 twnM stFn] .vq �/,d Ivor Tw ���n ru,p 'r•'r: .. RmRO F amaC f{tdb evert rr,m q I•P Arr 0M vseon'1 Mr w r� P ,at rDmp r1,. -, rrrt]vi0.[ tw1,m IIo arm w ,r6 OaPiaR. fgdpn W ,awrwrto w m Drrnpr ,I.wW4w mrrrr,[ r't•H `M�Mo,od rw141 rO�l ` iry`s 6 fvrK .R p.�P M ICGrb¢r rM rtR v fiKrt0.f � M M.t[ P. r lrrrmID',PwWor R rPr tart, Iiwr v ugwrr] µp ata[Nrmor P teK< a KRF P4 My br.1n( n,K at cr1 P ,tDq we rrs K mnrn[e q r-bY Wn .wortriyrr[ d M RYv IOUs we 4l OrNi wnv] d M P..RP r,prrm A M enrt r�oao tvunl Roue, Wo �R W y i-UA al IUn 4 rPM w /oPrl¢ P rest [we„rgrot fIIMrw d R �¢nn,r RnF �1� oorcne d K ew.F w xoAw rnm M M Mrwavmf ,r/tlr. a M W[ ,ry ]t Pan ' r' riot qume d rp.apt A M warn wrorrwr. a Mr • wrrr M r�,ys-err b %M v`R.wq' d M fPM[ w. M Mt tests wq nC Pts P ,crP, IRx¢ed _ • .ur M - llopnqub r,twm eqq ddemr wo W[n ,n.• Iua�R b eV lr, ]ft tar ,rr v M a /IC b oM Mw` Do�`iw wP[�FMYMY[I1n nHMK Iron eMR rrma _ ARi1CLE III b +uM[ oon rm Rdlmr, . Ka. rrar .qP Pc nw.t. P x wu gPws Mw•. w.n +� .r Kw�o"aq odr """"0 "' `],q.t d M w..o w. tEOAI'D6e1s71ON roa eown ' q num] d M w.ea w rtae nuM Mr we Qtn, d •r.°f,m w ry x`r m r,`i+U,.FUP"R"`,r r, - . Fr ,I P M mate Reaol P M rv,Pi aax mum pea ]eq` -Pl Iwl IPLp L' 1CraoK A M w•r nMP, I[[[via w ,w An RL ride.ntcl mNnl rrtanW A] M� Id Rogr,lwt ]eRNt] «t w' ARnCLE M�WMv lo�R'v rK ritK Race[ P rr-bP md.. ndM - - III M bPWt un w M1Fro[a F M tMm [WU rm[gl nPeM' +,rraUvr a+- . I NI —"m...n •.oan .w,a.eror-, .d • [r¢<,M aR P .t. ro•I n. x' rP Rom al.gd .,� o'n� u.'`.`;']me-W,. q i`, ry R e�A t�`ara � •, ao"wcr"O.'•- mm ni ]cid,]u :i *rrw. Pmarw BOVIIDMY NWIBISI@ICEB "ccvN rm A x ..,wa c[aevcOOparcr anv P R[.. '/•mr Barr n,tt ftlM[ rrq ewgPr rro ,OrCP 9Mr rre M fMr w No Rqn t to dvOP M qPD b MO dot 0.lr omrwr[o :w MTne rrwc mr[r] M re«,m rd M rl•avP P aavfq M twr.[r,7rm P rormrru tw v� iK P wrd rq ru. rtur powr d M Ewaµ. P� rgwt ARnCIE N uKq"Pr. r�'Pt M aaen nlorun q[ nrrw wvnq q ®wrm nIA¢w wq Peso obrwnw P M waai .ePan rar+s a ACCUMCA 1° w w`Pit•�.�•r'u w•�9Kr[ nu r°Pwo.t w'err�t`�..r..M w me. w•, qo nurum rrqurrrrm �M t� rmcm rw ,mRn ro Fq.o � n rre mrrron rd rnu .e,.aw. m[e F y _ uv, Pro ¢a caner.[ IrFf.arAPo nq M [•nnm Vrt P M La0. A twfrm w M W Wn rta[fna P= rd r,re wMrq e.d • �ArA,.[ .ray[_, P ,M amraw.l�.rR mm . aHTICIE Vln mod" n ragM wtga[ r<aw.P ra aR nR P spot. , r AP w . ,o ro . M n�,R f - ;Ra Oga'•wm a rGr .,a WN.rOr P oNm r[Pl r¢ rgPO .P AP AAA RfMAL M6 .¢[ .q[ PA ,•w. sOW�ox'�'O a o.KUAf rd-iav'rrsr v.q Pap. a bwI r A we d«mP[, Rw m, „nw": w.w, y� pipes (MW M P rtR rands. 1 RVIn wVrlen a rrOF`P' sT aN,w ,iaap wo : ,ry,[i M dw.[d dP �xO Mt4] dMM rrM ,' ;.> :I a lv"d"or t4v. o bvr M sreerw a fnetm P'b W.iq`a �`�oiR"Rv grs"`gnn a .card ��M wa' Swcr Ices 1¢ �R�ru w`�wdl4fe1w fRR'e¢PF n v K vest. ireOrr�, R"M[i`:N Lei o rr]9' r • srt rM ti sy yyµlrpt PmRolDi,/4ar VMrn10 W, r/`M�t ¢]e M stwPeaD m, F ors, Ovum •re • F !.o1no m e6lnJVORrwror K raroFrruVMl wa! [Pam[D R PCP A wr['R 1Ot "'� nM•Ri4"iY �` �'�viM A rr OPeMvr'�q qMi t«Rt !'ro mebrONr, Qob[rrMl M AMr rtWl[eM ARTICLE v werPwawt .wa.gr,, tMwr4Rerwa 90i.WCEp OF DATN w epY1b 'o �[[�w wo � � ` 'O"" ,uaM� �i rriru�irsr tqo , n�.n wq ]osgrr wq_r,[, Rt: 1 On11L;i Dlr,�,un ten mm"'°K P"ve tl ew.t m'"m'ra.'�°'et ¢, r•er M m[,r:wrt: ea:Pried .w rroor.o .a n ARTICLE IX ""'obi uq A M r[rneKPFro'tgo ma »o ]o'c"r r7q"rv'c1trDvtmuvq �uw: rA+Ica own ,rmi Titrrpn P M /.wRC r,oefw P M awrr ,[vest PrVwwUrCRlwayara: EApB.H7N/I11LE CW0.0IAIEN7 4EN2M: ettM[c D�M� P name' wR]rrrr b r]rar0: gems. nP:a D•A,rf rro Ra[ u nM•, ]aROgas ]ao "«nr�'Pm'r,e rr�w< RmR�O",ot a r i d.,. w"�P Fn.m'� «.am ». ,,.] r rwK mince ,tins r�'.'�I - . 5%c0- _.. r w dw.wd...ra dove a. R >< awRMt P w near„ tmae Wr Par rw. tern+ d M faMm �e w ,»'bt rtru rwCp L' •rmRew A M w,t MAP, b r[mrly rlfiurer f1 twooa.]q WI A P M, ,Pdr tdr e[fRn ,d MP rrww,riP. Wes¢ rtmr.arf i.._ q rqr b v M Rae Reoeos P rr:,n _.— moor. ndn renw la,m r P amo d r M wntonm rolnRe 4mcdre P ,[Camb PIM. A ilatd NrPaaew • rOQ rRrdr rsNeriAwrfu� dP,mwwmOA Aq� ®AD F e� �AMlww[[ ocrgn �r M � prt mocrta wx M OOO P . LOMUM ry Rtt emwiP¢ 6.A n M owno /J� v nme4.rror w] uN � / ._ _ ._.- - drgt ma ro FP tamRm w prof [. M .at[ mrewa:v.l M Atto,se uw•,v • �<�L__— 1Ae n. I \ :'��—. _ moral w O a tM w /ro ro,e,[rt' waM v rrtW �rmnP.l �] �Ar�IC f„envvl rCk P min[[ ]-Rewr ] P w Rt[ mawrn rp M otl6f ,t [—f wUL Ri �e[I,gPr RIMY w w rA 1r1t1, Orertm W Iar, W U ,V'oorlM1C rouoYn PMY reDn®F M)[Sf¢s n fuelrh M. r W M.t .. . faR rc P,m PPUR, A. rdr rrq un wR[o cram ,r. ,di •m¢,m. __ --'..... r,re„r,,, MU,t MA[p lafaPr K ,[veyM t IWP b ,r,] H,rtr w wq rtn]rr rd I.M' L W enP rall[16 v nR [¢'ord RR O teCrW fW P,C,C sr/Im IX v . rPard tmwle O]M,d•nr e �� wd[ip F tint. Iao¢F. K,ur . � pK •�•acro`ReR ], I/r] an tb ® O1 �. '� . /am00�a, 0[YMiPi A OMr ltrl] wq rrNrt¢ F oM. de M »ec Fqr v .weO /rn r,vapF�A w!rdrr M erio,q [dfM P N 1tLfK INIrI' d I.oe4 0a ]M � DTeNm.nmfl ,Rot[ L swlrrwrlr 1 � b y erreA n[S ,"eU1R/`a' t �aOruF �trl�r la[e LPL Wq qe mR[v Pu[[ ,w nT weMtl >•w rre M-,v ,[9Pn•ar. RR Iar PR rPa,rM' M 1®AV,nr q IrlrPCm N Prpr RmM Imr 1lar, A, I/4 al]I IBllan R•PSr I P M perm, RMwfagM cal- . laln Plrolrv(! rlrJ Rntl M. Wsr rRv[rrt/. erftim ,tD,rwo MMi,`� ��!]!`n N-if. M-f. ]e-A rrm Y-rn .tR Nm rd M lifd p d�'a[ W t"'oWlur]'�] �r"� rPiuR� : Ro�,®�RbnnL rtCne] IJmt� O Id ]dev car v ]w m v. K El REVENED AAWA I ,GCB %"ZIWZM BURVEY AND B®UNDAT-It r AND WOPOONAIDWIC ` '13Y 1 's PLAT BOOK 1110, PAGE 80, MIAMI-DADE COUNTY RECORDS, LYING IN SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 64 SOUTH, =a RANGE 42 EAST, CITY OF MIAMI, MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA. Il S. FRE PANW M Apm 'm , CMMInC EGt[ N f[EI ti°I'°" R �fM,ItauY NOW N.V. MTM AVENUC ----- CHOP -IN ' MAAI. FLOA10A 03ff!-1007 P L AZA DOWS0l-7276 CH0PIN P L AZA - 4nt'0TJ i—use------- cocas I lj I J g PORTION OF TRACT �CC� 'DU PONT PLAZA' i 1 yl z eleoaorsNwt°ac m. recta P I �, Z9 Q I X W I ,, rwc t noe so.°t OA,ArRpp,; N �a�� F � � � I ` � �Ii NOT A PARTewe - 1I I FOUR STORY CBS BULDIN eru mIse. s I m - -- - -- - -- 1 A�------------- --------------- -- ---------------- -- - �— ------�-1 A --- - - - TRACTroU"A" 1 L •ONE MIAMI PARCEL A• e�.c nuAmArtevuc one cve oev°IoesMMieeacmre¢i4 ""'"'-��y I .. �Zi, QF n I� ay, .....s.. MQ z 5 '`c i s�sx �g z I TRACT 'C' 'DU PONT PLAZA' Ra010®NMT000t QI.aIR ,191C � O LVL't adM1, N1Yp,) N O T A P A R T '�` �N9COI000PNWC�COIMYmPme1 .. ■L n.w fwr.,p. i 1 .. ,,;,`IER `I 1 NtJII11NC� I'f1.^.ff � I • t�0.* Ia.VnMf Ia�YfV/'�. LEOENQI rd A - _ R-raRGamut _ omt=ov,�x n - ran a I.mtr e - A- .... rs -rnnfl 8fEEf 2 OF ! -------------------------- ' 0 15 30 60 J 90 _ SCALE 0! FEET ' N _ _ /f POOL LEVEL _ - {�—F/} LANDSCAPE PLAN L 2 scaW1*=3Y • • rty; 'j - ' �� F��•1I TI �+,�`!• l'. f, �1 F )�T its ]t •' i^n.l:. rye �`" �... Ill -AMINIMMINNNME M11.6- f• ELL VM 1 Iv 14 SCALE 1/0--1'.0• PLAN SECTION 1 SCALE 1/0'-1'0' � 4 AEC �QF PA�FeruErurtr �� Y. . SECTION 2 SCALE 1/0*-1'-0' SCALE 1/8'-1'-a SECTION 3 n> � I P�KOIme UxEl , FAM rlFJltun(: ronru SCALE 1/a'-NY Arm c r,FAmrR: nrvnw ru AT GRADE L 3 Lyy� " LANDSCAPE DETAILS An 'L _ scale: as sham I Ix (5.[. srd ,T.).1" Sul StM urzrtu k - - 'a R[AHs Iql caH n I I . R+a aas u .ca+rza ilt',A V. .4,1:.^- ... I. .� ' __•• .f 11.^'. IG+' 1 - .NoPvnoOPcum.K.xa].REN. 'itD 2 m mrxm w 4IE. L 1 -Iu. I irniuA+:mr I I �TV.. fig ..._.-7enl . ' - i i I ; —M. • J '+' .•��� .. ,1 +� / PllOv IY.i25' BMD Ix'.x2 4 J l I' I I ♦ti T.:'^ n PRDR !' RID vROPoauxAR / uuurol[YD.s r,`--------- - - --� �� .. - + ,�_ ate"'='^r�„'�•"/•. 'co'n..'�R'nj' a 1 - ,Ia+ '"°sr'YQ. / mOP :. WAHAR NEu PRDP DRARQR - Aw xNlxYAAIMVMRML•. xHvnwx IIIII �' ,i''�II ` Ii l01 Ivwam'Y r"` -. - %�— [ = '. �_ °'"�1 _Id- 7I %fa— i-il �-M•N I+!'M • -R ,U�Ir[RAL (S•[o[ R ,/.. %.�- .+"Y /1 �^,;,"°w" �iPROP u• or w °rl(0Aaiu`earrz[ 0— 0EMST wooL Kuy NIN PI SIdaMAR IIl "RO!' C <.RNn1 1D.'M1REI "ST xw/ - . - HYDRANT I, 111� �Ii 4 • �[ ' + /� / [xnT DRAMAR N[11 PROP 21. WAl"GE N[LL • l _ Y{•MI 01 - ! i/ ! PROP 4ANHQ[ W..2 Iti 'n NE v0 AY'4 �. I - - ' RM a -- + P w �! �RY� I I I'O+IY.A Elm xtS . fH ASSEUBLY - - --f JJ I � PROO`�+• DR.HACE NE4 (S E. 41h 'M S[Nm loa - - 12. -disrtu To R[uuH _ PIIOP YAI[In[ MO. 1 - Aua SW FL. I.13 PROP IY1I1x.D' BEID - � 11V GRAPHIC SCALE / co-30 1 306d. 90 PRDP n' ow TO UST EYSr N' w wu Y9 A IY ru•RR(D vnK . In nun,u w wlv1y um5 - 1 Inch nA1E_— � - - Pre/imilml Itiliz lgeli One /JJiami WE DATA 8 D DaOPMW PROGRAM WAM: Y tMN t6NrR [YIxYQ. W RQA 1VIa0 aNA;m 01[l [SMDtQ4t0B[l' 10tA4A: wtQO AOIQ WQAVMp1( :I�IMII(alY1p rnaDlwrQpwl ko•a .o® tnD tI tv �I II amroNDfl IQtta tI v YI fr'7/AY-I QGN i� .mmu guru r � AtP am+.u. :oonu. RaP �+ur.w :mmu. wum la.a atacn r al¢m I[1I14 :OMu. panum watara wpnimnna :rwlom m Dmu.0 :alaQ. ' aruQRto-a :o- wa namuQ[Qst e eanalum•u[sIm unu[: mau:wpuuu. wrm•twu.lwu..lwnn Awrt m•uY [swwa: •m0u•[t•npn[a•nvm wiQw:�lvnp u. •�m•usulwu•rYnsu m[anlo[.a: YD[Bl 10.m plmlv.a p[mvQ p[IY v�■ p•m Q•Q FIESKWML:AF$A1FAR l w tal t o 0 l w tulp MlM rAlailDr vq [0 DA CA aan.aluaanl.a[naa aaaauaaQuuuDw raei a rw «rAq • am ss avraq tro ue fro blaw 1qR mw OFM:APFAIFAA Ifp Y4 Ulga Ol90PM l0 0101@aK Q !� 1J4 QiG tllwl Y M� M1Q art vret P aal artu+et p aw ew wiH aD pICt NO•R A Dw Ylro Allw[WD•Y Ata 011U. S.*, .v A 1.1 • • .ire:, ��, 0 OVERALL MEZZANINE FLOOR PLAN A 1.3 erab: i'=30 u • • .:...s...w' Y'x ...:...,c:,....-. iia�.gx84y�1� Vs`.:�s.�� r..yyr�e-�.�.,.v.:,o.�_:-s..�,,.K.,-,=,�„�...:•.:..-.,.,.....,.,..._,.ems...........-�.--- ___._......-- --.._. _ _ .... cmle. 1 70' w ` : ,V-Yr 0 0 scale: 1 . V lA G E- OVERALL MID•RISE LEVELS PLAN -%.: 1*=3u r; ZiN RO _ ..- I' ® - WWI :.. _ ON x_,. m.aMw n, . --- - ® m•�aa was-•�-- w _ own o..m VAN RIP AV nr r 0— orm A 3i mr s{ fRNUB D—bwft " OVELL EASELEVATION A 1.11 - scab: 1' _ W OFFICE GROUND FLOOR PLAN A 2.1 aalo: vie• � rm , OFFICE MEZZANINE FLOOR PLAN - B2 =We: 11ir = V.V A2.2 OFF CE MEP/SUPPORT FLOOR PLAN - B3 -A 2.3 - scale: 1116' = V-T - 0 • e. C T—a �; � ol- ♦R.. IAIE 9 . j E V� j OFFICE AT LEVEL B4 scale: 111F • V-T �7 n OFFICE LOW-RISE/PK'G LEVEL PLAN A 2.5 stale: 1116'= V-v • • i>- M iP nenniNu Haase onn.un .iesx: iennx: airuw ��,Iw stunn OFFIC LOW RESEIPK'G LEVELS 8 T010 A 2.5a vak: 1116= V-V EDOFFIC LOW RISE FLOOR PLAN A 2.6 scab: 1116'= V-V E C W_ it 457 N (D OFFICE HIGH RISE FLOOR PLAN 2.7 WW%:Vl6,.Vv e i_ 3yt ty tc� '- � Alf - OFFICE ROOF PLAN A 2.8 =10:111C = PV m N / RESDEMIAL RESIDENTIAL / PK 'G GROSS AREA /� n,e�e SF. GROUND FLOOR PLAN3 , 1- A —W Ills'. ra m IEJOEMYL/1Ei2 Og69 i)YJ BP. NOW RESIDENTIAL / PICG SECOND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 3.2 ttNa f/16'=1'-0' t-' sib vi6�.r o 0 C7 RESIDENTIAUPK'G FLOOR PLAN LEVELS 4, 5 & 6 R uunnus mrlmun �IBIIC MN:tM. ItFV11W.� 9A��uu1�+- enn ovc,. Rlmiwo Olge J'n M IrRily �mon� A 3.4 NTS 150 RESIDENTIAL POOL LEVEL FLOOR PLAN ..m 1116=r-q �. • .___ _.. taie 1fl8'=I'4 RESIDENTIAL FLOOR PLAN LEVEL 43 swbM6'-V.lr • RESIDENTIAL GROSS 3,671 S.F. 6� n RESIDENTIAL FLOOR PLAN LEVELS 46th. TO 48th. A 3.10 etlb 11164 ' • RESIDENTIAL GROSS _. 3.671 S.F. 01D 1 RESIDENTIAL FLOOR PLAN LEVEL 49th. A 311 wale tll6'=1'V 0 E- ct"D RESIENTAL BUILD SOUTHDELEVATIONIING A3.12 RESIENTAL BUILD NORTDH ELIEVATIONING A 3.13 scale: J' w 0 MMM 0:9 OW Ivan IV M.11 SIR IV Ell A Own RESIDDINGENTIAL BUIL EAST ELEVATION A 3.14 AD • ONE MIAMI SUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENT TO PRIOR MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT Preparedby ARQUITECTONICA CONSUL -TECH ENGINEERING, INC. CURTIS ROGERS DESIGN STUD/0, INC. DAVID PLUMMER & ASSOCIATFS GREENBERG TRAURIG, P.A. SHARPTON, BRUNSON & COMPANY Submitted into the public recoitem Vtior with 2o nnone% - `/L item Waiter Foeman City Clergy September, 2000 00-1137 0 September, 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Project Information A. Letter of Intent B. Application for Amendment to Major Use Special Permit and Special Exception Application C. Zoning Write -Up D. City Commission Resolution No. 98-1151 E. Aerials F. Zoning Atlas Page 36 G. Project Data Sheet H. Computer Tax Printout/Deed I. Ownership List J. State of Florida Partnership Documents K. Directory of Project Principals L. Owner's Authorization Letter II. Project Description A. Zoning Ordinance No. 11000 1. Section 1304.2.1 Applications Forms; Supplementary Materials 2. Section 1702.2.1 General Report 3. Section 1702.2.2 Major Use Special Permit Concept Plan 4. Section 1702.2.3 Developmental Impact Study III. Supporting Documents Submitted into the public Tab 1 Minority Construction Employment Plan record.,in connection with item 2� —C on (- 2.Z. —do Tab 2 Traffic Impact Analysis Walter Foeman City Clerk • Tab 3 Site Utility Study Tab 4 Economic Impact Study Tab 5 Survey of Property Tab 6 Drawings Submitted • Submitted into the public recor connection item with on Walter Foeman City Cleric 00--113 1 ONE MIAMI MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT PROJECT INFORMATION ARTICLE I. Project Information A. Letter of Intent B. Application for Amendment to Major Use Special Permit and Special Exception Application C. Zoning Write -Up D. City Commission Resolution No. 98-1151 E. Aerials F. Zoning Atlas Page 36 ® G. Project Data Sheet H. Computer Tax Printout/Deed I. Ownership List J. State of Florida Partnership Documents K. Directory of Project Principals L. Owner's Authorization Letter • Submitted into the recor -Connection Public item with Walter Foeman; City Clerk 00-11907 • • 11 • GBEENBEflG • 0iBfl�Blfi Lucia A. Dougherty (305) 579-0603 E-Mail: doughertyl@gtlaw.com September 7, 2000 Ms. Teresita Fernandez Clerk, Hearing Boards City of Miami 444 S.W. 2nd Avenue, 71h Floor Miami, FL 33130 Re: Letter of Intent for One Miami Dear Ms. Fernandez: On behalf of The Related Group of Florida, a Florida general partnership, we are submitting an application for an amendment to a Major Use Special Permit ("MUSP"). The MUSP was approved by the City Commission on November 17, 1998 pursuant to Resolution No. 98-1151. The enclosed application requests: 1) approval of a 425 unit residential building, a 707,025 gross square foot office building and a 1,834 space parking garage; 2) that the MUSP Amendment to be issued for this project, provide that this project will be bifurcated from the prior approved MUSP Resolution No. 98-1151 and therefore, all conditions will be included within the new MUSP and any future amendments and/or modifications, will not require the approval of the property owner(s) which are included within Resolution No. 98-1151; 3) request for a Phased Development per Section 2502 of Ordinance 11000, and 4) a waiver of the City's Waterfront Charter provision pursuant to Section 3 (mm) (iii) of the City Charter. The Charter provision requires a setback of fifty (50) feet from Biscayne Bay and the Miami River. The residential building is setback thirty (30) feet from the seawall on the east side adjacent to Biscayne Bay and the residential and office buildings are setback between thirty-four (34) and sixty-four (64) feet from the seawall adjacent to the Miami River. The One Miami project is providing a twenty (20) foot public walkway along the waterfront of the entire parcel, as well as a proposed water taxi stop. The public walkway will include benches and a lookout area. Should you have any questions, please call me at (305) 579-0603. Thank you very much for your attention to this matter. MIAMI/PARDOA/976832/kxg801 !.DOC/9/06/00 Very trul yours, Ludia A. DoJdgherty Submitted into the public recorjjj In connection with Itemi 14�2� on Walter Foeman City Clerk GREENBERG TRAURIG, P.A. 1221 BRICKELL AVENUE MIAMI, FLORIDA 33131 305-579-0500 FAx 305-579-0717 www.gtlaw.com (� 7 MIAMI NEW YORK WASHINGTON; D.C. ATLANTA PHILADELPHIA TYSONS CORNER SAO PAU0 8J FORT LAUDERDALE WEST PALM BEACH ORLANDO TALLAHASSEE BOCA RATON 0 Submitted into the public CITE' OF MIA.MI record in connection with "" item 1zr on PLANNING DEPARTMENT Walter Foeman City Clerk APPLICATION FOR MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT IT IS INTENDED THAT MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMITS BE REQUIRED WHERE SPECIFIED USES AND/OR OCCUPANCIES INVOLVE MATTERS DEEMED TO BE OF CITYWIDE OR AREA -WIDE IMPORTANCE. THE CITY COMMISSION SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR DETERMINATIONS ON APPLICATIONS FOR MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMITS. (SEE ARTICLE 17 OF ORDINANCE 11000, AS AMENDED, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA.) THE CITY COMMISSION SHALL REFER ALL APPLICATIONS FOR MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMITS TO THE PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD AND TO THE DIRECTOR OF THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT FOR RECOMMENDATIONS, AND MAY MAKE REFERRALS TO AGENCIES, BODIES, OR OFFICERS, EITHER THROUGH THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT OR DIRECTLY, FOR REVIEW, ANALYSIS AND/OR TECHNICAL FINDINGS AND DETERMINATIONS AND REPORTS THEREON. (SEE SECTION 1301.5 OF ORDINANCE 11000, AS AMENDED, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAM1, FLORIDA.) SECTION 2-653 OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI,.FLORIDA, AS AMENDED, GENERALLY REQUIRES ANY PERSON WHO RECEIVES COMPENSATION, REMUNERATION OR EXPENSES FOR CONDUCTING LOBBYING ACTIVITIES TO REGISTER AS A LOBBYIST WITH THE CITY CLERK, PRIOR TO ENGAGING IN LOBBYING ACTIVITIES BEFORE CITY STAFF, BOARDS, COMMITTEES AND THE CITY COMMISSION. A COPY OF SAID ORDINANCE IS AVAILABLE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK (NUAMI CITY HALL), LOCATED AT 3500 PAN AMERICAN DRIVE, MIAMI, FLORIDA, 33133. NOTE: THIS APPLICATION MUST BE TYPEWRITTENAND SIGNED IN BLACK INK I, Lucia A D o u a h e r t y, o n beh a l f o f,1Iereby apply to the Director of the Planning Department of the City of Miami for approval of a Major Use Special Permit under the provisions of Article 17 of the City of Miami Zoning Ordinance. *The ReLa.ted Troup of Florida, contract purchaser and Miam= Property Address: One Centre, L.P. owner 205 S(it h Ri cravnP Rr) L-ya rd Nature of proposed use (be specific): A request for an amendment to a prior approved Maior Use SoeciaL Permit which wag grantaH h; the r;+� Commission pursuant to ResoLution No. 98-1151. See attached Exhibit "1" for the Zoning Write—Uo APPLICATION MATERIALS I attach the following in support and explanation of the application: [X 1. Two original surveys, prepared by a State of Florida Registered Land Surveyor within one year from the date of application. 2. Affidavit disclosing ownership of property covered by application and disclosure of interest form (attach forms 4-83 and 4a-83 to application). O®-��0 • ,APPLICATION MATERIALS (continued) h the following in support and explanation of the application: Q SuOtted into the public record in connection with item R2� — on . Walter Foernan City Clerk 3. Certified list of owners of.real estate within a 375-foot radius from the outside boundaries of property (attach form 6-83 to application). 53 4. Maps of the: a) Existing zoning designation. b) Adopted comprehensive plan designation for areas on and around the property. Q 5. General location map showing relation to the site or activity to major streets, schools, existing utilities, shopping areas, important physical features in and adjoining the project, and the like. ® 6. Concept Plan a) Site plan and relevant information per Section 1304.2.1d-h. b) Relationships to surrounding existing and proposed futures uses and activities, systems and facilities, per Section 1702.3.2a. c) How concept affects existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan principles and designations; tabulation of any required variances, special permits, changes of zoning or exemptions, per Section 1702.3.2b. ZI 7. Developmental Impact Study (an application for development approval for a Development of Regional Impact may substitute). 0 8. Other (be specific): ® 9. Fee of $ 45,000 , for the Major Use Special Permit, based on current fee schedule as set forth in Chapter 62 of the Code of the City of Miami, as amended. ❑ 10. Additional fee of $ — 0 , for any required special permits, changes of zoning or variances set forth in chapter 62 of the Code of the City of Miami, as amended. Total Fee: $ 45,000 Signature Name Lucia A. Dougherty Address 1221 BrickeLL Avenue, Miami, FL Phone/Fax Date SP�tPmhar 7., 2000 APPROVAL OF THIS APPLICATION FOR MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT SHALL CONSIST OF AN EXECUTED RESOLUTION BY THE NOCITY COMMISSION AND A DEVELOPMENT ORDER ATTACHED THERETO WHICH SPECIFIES THE CONDITIONS UNDER WHICH THUS , USE SPECIAL PERMIT APPLICATION IS APPROVED; IF APPROVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION, SAID RESOLUTION AND DE ..>LOPMENT ORDER SHALL, UPON EXECUTION THEREOF, BE TRANSMITTED TO THE OWNER OR AUTHORIZED AGENT AT THE ADDRESS SPECIFIED ABOVE. 00- E • STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE 0 Submitted into the public record in connection with item = on / 2 i w'- Walter Foeman The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this V day of Sept e m b c rty Cleric 20 00 ,by Lucia A. Dougherty who known to me or who has produced as identification and who did (did not) take an oath. STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE is personally pi 2stF!FWi%IDAC0 So'�I Mmmvssion E The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20 , by of corporation, on behalf of the produced STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE a corporation. He/She is personally known to me or has as identification and who did (did not) take an oath. Name: Notary Public -State of Florida Commission No.: My Commission Expires: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 20 by behalf of He/She is personally known to me or who has produced as identification and who did (did not) take an oath. day of partner (or agent] on a partnership. Name: Notary Public -State of Florida Commission No.: My Commission Expires: • Submitted into the public record in connection with item aL_4__ on Lam,(/ ter_ Walter Foeman APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTION City Clerk CITY OF MIAMI OFFICE OF HEARING BOARDS #+t###r#rrMrrO►#4rr1'KMM##t4#rr#ir►r###rrM#r�Yrrr#rr#rrr#lrknK#YMrlrrfir#rrrrn#ii#r##r#rrrrrK#rrrrrr####rr#rr►rr#►##►r ANY PERSON WHO RECEIVES COMPENSATION, REMUNERATION OR EXPENSES FOR CONDUCTING LOBBYING ACTIVITIES TO REGISTER AS A LOBBYIST WITH THE CITY CLERK, PRIOR TO ENGAGING IN LOBBYING ACTIVITIES BEFORE CITY STAFF, BOARDS, COMMITTEES AND THE CITY COMMISSION. A COPY OF SAID ORDINANCE IS AVAILABLE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK (MIAMI CITY HALL), LOCATED AT 3500 PAN AMERICAN DRIVE, MIAMI, FLORIDA, 3313.3. r###w#rr#rrr#r##►#�##,tr►r##rrr#r#rrsrrarrr#rv.r#r#rrrrrrrrrr►rr#r#fr#►#r#r►s#rr#ry.###rrrrrrrrrr#r####rr#r►�.######rrrrr#r#►.rsrrrrrr►r NOTE: THIS APPLICATION MUST BE TYPEWRITTEN AND SIGNED IN BLACK INK. IT WILL BE ACCEPTED BY THIS OFFICE ONLY THE FIRST SEVEN (7) DAYS OF THE MONTH. APPLICANTS ARE RESPONSIBLE, IF NEEDED, TO BRING AN INTERPRETER FOR THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE TO ANY PRESENTATION BEFORE ANY BOARD OR COMMITTEE AND THE CITY COMMISSION. Within the City generally, or within certain zoning districts, certain structures, uses, and/or occupancies specified in this ordinance are of a nature requiring special and intensive review to determine whether or not they should be permitted in specific locations, and if so, the special limitations, conditions, and isafeguards which should be applied as reasonably necessary promote the general purposes of this Zoning Ordinance and, in particular, to protect adjoining properties and the neighborhood from avoidable potentially adverse effects. It is further intended that the expertise and judgment of the Zoning Board be exercised in making such determinations, in accordance with the rules, considerations and limitations relating to Special Exceptions (see Article 16 of the Zoning Ordinance). Formal public notice and hearing is mandatory for Special Exceptions. The Zoning Board shall be solely responsible for determinations on applications for. Special Exceptions except when otherwise provided for in the City Code. All applications shall be referred to the Director of the Planning and Zoning Department for his recommendations and the Director shall make any further referrals required by these regulations.. Lucia A. Dougherty, on behalf of The 4elat.ed Group of Florida, I, contract purchaser and Miami One Centre, L.P., owner hereby apply to the City of Miami Zoning Board for approval of a Special Exception for the property located at 205 .South B.i s c a y n e B o u l e v a r d folio number n1-n114-n7n-1 n41 Nature of proposed use (please be specific): See attached Exhibit "1" In support of this application, the following materials are submitted: 1. Two original surveys of the property prepared by a State of Florida Registered Land Surveyor within one year from the date of application. 2. Four copies -signed and sealed by a State of Florida Registered Architect or Engineer of site plans showing (as required) property boundaries, existing (if any) and proposed structure(s), parking, landscaping, etc.; building elevations and dimensions and computations of lot area and building spacing. ®®-'1109,D119V • • 3. Plans need to be stamped by the Office of Hearing Boards and signed by Public Works, Zoning and Planning prior to submission of application. 4. One (1) 8'h x 11 copy of the signed plans attached to this application. 5. Affidavit and disclosure of ownership of property covered by applications and disclosure of interest from attached to this application. 6. Certified list of owners of real estate within a 375-foot radius of the outside boundaries of property covered by the application. 7. At least two photographs that show the entire property (land and improvements). 8. Recorded warranty deed and tax forms for the most current year available that show the present owners) of the property. 9. Other (Specify and attach cover letters explaining why any document you are attaching is pertinent to this application): 10. Cost of processing according to Section 62-156 of the Zoning Ordinance: Special exception $ 800.00 Special exception requiring automatic city commission review $ 2,000.00 Extension of time for special exception $ 500.00 Public hearing mail notice fees, including cost of handling and mailing per notice $ 3.50 Surcharge equal to applicable fee from item above, not to exceed eight hundred dollars ($800.00) except from agencies of the city; such surcharge to be refunded to the applicant if there is no appeal from a property owner within three hundred and seventy-five (375) feet of the subject property. Submitted into the public Signature re ofC� en c nnection with Name .� Lucia A. Dougherty J� on ` /& itemIte�� /f Walter Foernan Address 1221 R r i c k e L L Avenue City Clerk Miami, Florida 33131 Telephone (305) 579=0603 Date September 7, 2000 0 ,2 • DISCLOSURE OF OWNERSHIP 1. Legal description and street address of subject real property: 205 South Biscayne Boulevard See attached Exhibit "2" for legal description 2. Owner(s) of subject real property and percentage of ownership. Note: Section 2-618 of the Code of the City of Miami requires disclosure of all parties having a financial interest, either direct or indirect, in the subject matter of a presentation, request or petition to the City Commission. Accordingly, question #2 requires disclosure of shareholders of corporations, beneficiaries of trust, and/or any other interested parties, together with their addresses and proportionate interest. See attached Exhibit "3". 3. Legal description and street address of any real property (a) owned by any party listed in answer to question #2, and (b) located within 375 feet of the subject real property. See attached Exhibit "4". Owner or Attorney fo . Owner Lucia A. Dougherty STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of �►u'1 2000 by Lucia A. Dougherty who is personally known to me or who h-as produced as identification and who did (did not) take an oath. Name: Notary P ic-�- te pF FloK1idSEAL Commiss on T1,70Ny kLEZz z ,.,ti..._ �::. :: a OF FLCRIDA My Com 7ssion ��Cpiras �. c4. c ga s fi <y Submitted into the public record in connection with • item �on Walter Foeman . City Clerk 00-11311b, ® Submitted into the public record in connection with OWNER'S LIST item _i on ! a !►r./.& f 's Name M i a m i O n e Centre, L. P: Walter Foerna Clerk Ma. ;Address 5000 Blue Lake Drive, Y150, Boca Raton, FL 33431 Zip Code Telephone Number (561) 998-9200 Legal Description: See attached Exhibit "2" U(Vil rg Name Mailing Address _Zip Code Telephone Number Legal Description: Owner's Name Mailing Address Zip Code T'ell0e Number Legal Description: - any other real estate property owned individually, jointly, or severally (by corporation, partnership or privately) within 375 feet of the subject site is listed as follows: Street Address Street Address Street Address Legal Description See attached Exhibit "4" Legal Description Legal Description OWNER'S LIST Submitted into the public record in connection with Cl- -P-'s Name item on l-a-kc7 F e m a n MID, Address Zip Code City Clerk Telephone Number Legal Description: applicant's UJW4Name The Related Groun of Florida Mailing Address ?^ .'? C o r a L Way, P i a m i, F l o r i d a Zip Code 3 31 1; 5 Telephone Number Legal Description: Owner's Name Mailing Address - Zip Code Te, Oe Number Legal Description: kny other real estate property owned individually, jointly, or severally (by corporation, partnership or privately) within 375 feet of the subject site is listed as follows: Street Address Street Address Street Address • Legal Description Legal Description Legal Description 00-1 37 AFFIDAVIT Before me, the undersigned authority, this day personally appeared Lucia A. Dougherty , who being by me first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and says: 1. That he/she is the owner, or the legal representative of the owner, submitting the accompanying application for a public hearing as required by Chapter 55 of the Code of the City of Miami, Florida, affecting the real property located in the City of Miami, as described and listed on the pages attached to this affidavit and made a part thereof. 2. That all owners which he/she represents, if any, have given their full and complete permission for him/her to act in his/her behalf for the change or modification of a classification or regulation of zoning as set out in the accompanying petition. 3. That the pages attached hereto and made a part of this affidavit contain the current names,_ mailing addresses, telephone numbers and legal descriptions for the real property of * which he/she is the owner or legal representative. 4. The facts as represented in the application and documents submitted in conjunction with this affidavit are true and correct. Further Affiant sayeth not. Applicant's Signature STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2000 , by eL C,_ 14. P who is ersonally known tome or who has produced as identification and who did (did not) take an oath. Submitted into the public record n^ connection with item 0� on Walter Foeman City Clerk Nar'e Not ry Public Sta#e ofyC Commission No.: My Commission Expires: 00-11317 ONE NEL4A I CBD/CENTRAL BUSINESS- DISTRICT Per City Code, Chapter 36. Construction Equipment. Request for waiver of noise ordinance while under construction for continuous pours. Per City code, Chapter 23-5a, Request fpr a Certificate of Appropriateness for ground disturbing activity in an Archeological Conservation Area. MUSP, per Article 17 for development of 425 residential units. NWSP, per Article 17 for a parking structure of 1834 parking spaces. NIU'SP, as per Article 17, for nonresidential uses - involving an excess of 626,227 square feet floor area ratio. Special Exception as Article 9, Section 917.1.2, to allow valet parking for restaurant up 50% of existing off-street parking spaces, Special Exception as per Article 4, section 401, to allow bar/]ounge open to the public within the CRD District Class H Special Permit as per Article 15, Section 1511, for any development between Biscayne Bay and the first dedicated right-of-way. Class 11 Special Permit as per Article 4, Section 401, for temporary construction fence and covered walkway. Class II Special Permit as per Article 4, Section 401, for development of new construction within the CBD Distreit Class H Special, Permit per Article 9, section 908.9, for development on Biscayne Boulevard. Class IT Special Permit as per Article 9, Section 908.2, for access from a public street roadway width greater than 25 feet. Class 11 Special Permit as per Article 15, Section 1512, waiver of Guides and Standards and guidelines, for 5 feet driveway from property line. Class I Special Permit as per Article 9, Section 915.2, for FAA clearance letter. Submitted into the public record i connection with item record -L`�"w Walter Foeman City Clerk TnTAI P. AP 00_II. • 11 Mass I Special Permit as per Article 9, Section 906.6, for pool/outdoor recreation area. Class I Special Permit as Article 9, Section Section 9171.11 to allow valet parking for residential and other uses. Class I Special Permit as per Article 9, Section 925.3.8, to allow development/construction/rental signage. Class I Permit as per Article 9, Section 918.2, for parking and staging of construction during construction. Class I Permit as per Article 9, Scetionction 920.1, to allow construction trailer. Request for the following iYJtUSP conditions to be required at time of shell permit instead of at issuance of foundation permit: a.. The requirement to provide a letter of assurance for the Solid Waste Department; and b. The requirement to record in the Public Records a Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions providing that the ownership, operation and maintenance of all common areas and facilities will be by the property owner or a mandatory property owner association; and c. The requirement to record in the Public Records a. unity of title or covenant is lieu of unity, of title. Designation as a phased development pursuant to Section 2502 of Ordinance No. 11000. Request for waiver of Waterfront Charter permission per section 3(mm) (0) of the Charter. r4orv J' Y McPhee Da#e Zoning Inspector Submitted into the public record in connection with item 2&L on Walter Foeman Y.r _ City/ Clerk 0 ® - 1 1 3 9 0 Exhibit "2" All of Tract A, ONE MIAMI PARCEL A, recorded in Plat Book 155 at Page 80, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida. r • Submitted into the public record in connection with item 21S on _2111y.&w Walter Foeman F.- City Clerk 0-1137 ® Exhibit ' 3" • Disclosure of Ownership for Miami One Centre, L.P: Miami One Centre. L.P. - Owner Miami One Holdco, Ltd. owns 33% NLS Miami Partners owns 33% M.L. Stoltz Miami Partners owns 18.415% BFMC Investment, L.L.C. owns 14.585% Miami One Centre, Inc. owns 1% 100% Miami One Holdco, Ltd. - is owned 100% by Larry DeGeorge, individually. NLS Miami Partners - is owned 52.62% by Ned Siegel - and no other parties own 5% or greater. M.L. Stoltz Miami Partners - is owned 100% by Skip Stoltz, individually. BFMC Investment, L.L.C.- is owned 100% by Barry Florescue, individually. MIAMUPARDOA/1168128/p 1C001!.DOC/8/30/00/99999.457721 • Submitted into the public recur. in connection with item 2--,T on �? /J�/c� Walter Foeman City Clerk 0 — I 1*1 17 .71 "3" 1 QWNER__�__SHIP TRUCTIJBZ Exhibit ENTITY� The Related Group of Florida A Florida General Partnership General Partner - Related Florida., Ltd. 50.50% Limited Partner - Related General of Florida, Ltd. 49.50% rdNTIIX Related Florida, Ltd. A Florida Limited Partnership Corporation General Partner • Related Florida, Inc. 1,0011/0 Limited Partner - Jorge M. Perez 99.00% Related Florida, Inc. A Florida Corporation Jorge M. Perez - 100% Shareholder Officers: Jorge M. Perez - President Roberta S. Roclia - Senior Vice President Angel A. Hernandez - Assistant Secretary 2828 Coral Way - Penthouse Miami; Florida 33145 (305) 460-9900 ENTITY Relaters General of Floridai Ltd, A Florida Limited Partnership General partner - RCMP, Inc. 1.000/0 Limited Partner - The Related Companies, L.P. 99.00% Officers: Stephen M. Ross - President James Flood -Executive Vice President Submitted into the Susan J. McQuire - Secretary public 'cord in CorineCtion �� with item S on 1,2,Z � _c / 625 Madison Avenue Walter Foeman New York, New York 10022 (211) 421-5333 City Clerk 00-1 • RCMP. Inc. 100.00% Related Companies L.P. OFFICERS: Stephen M. Ross, president Michael Brenner, Executive Vice President Susan McGuire, Secretary. Michael J. WechsIer, Treasurer The Related Companies L.P. 1.00%GP. The Related Realty Group, Inc. 64.7%Ltd. Stephen M. Ross 24.50/oLtd. Outside Investors (see attached .list) 9.800/oLtd. ' Jorge M. Perez Total 100.00% ]Rel2ted Companies L.P. Outside Investors Stephen M. Ross Susan Snider Deborah Williams Jorge M. Perez Trust for Morris Ginsberg Estate for Calm' on Ginsburg James Snider 1987*IRR Ins. Tr. Trust for Daniel Ginsberg Trust for Laurie Rudey Laurie Rudey Trust for Donald Ginsberg Rona Jaffe Trust for Elsie Robinson Louis Weinberg Andrew Augenblick • Estate of Daniel Ginsberg Donald Ginsberg Estate of Morris G insberg Calmon Ginsber& Submitted into the public record in connection_ with item on /2/ Walter Foeman City Clerk 00--1137 9 Exhibit "4" 0 Miami One Centre, L.P. is the owner of the following: Project Legal Description _ Farces B All of Block 3, DU PONT PLAZA, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 50, Page 11, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. Parcel C Lots 1 through 8, both inclusive, Block 2, DU PONT PLAZA, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 50, Page 11, of the Public Records of Dade ,County, Florida. 0 Parcel D All of Block 4, DU PONT PLAZA, .-: cording to the plat thereof as recorded. in Plat Book 50, Page 11, of the Public Recor(,; ;' r Dade County, Florida. • Submitted into the public record,in connection with item Z on�I_�,/�° Walter Fdeman City Clerk 00-1137 r-1 ONE YRAMI CBD/CENTRAL, BUSINESS DISTRICT Per City Code, Chapter 36. Construction Equipment Bequest for waiver of noise ordinance while under construction for continuous pours. Per City code, Chapter 23-5a, Request fpr a Certificate of Appropriateness . for ground disturbing activity in an Archeological Conservation Area. MUSP, per Article 17 for development of 425 residential units. MUSP, per Article 17 for a parking structure of 1834 parking spaces. MUSP, as per Article 17, for nonresidential uses involving an excess of 626,227 square feet floor area ratio. Special Exception as Article 9, Section 917.1.2, to allow valet parking for restaurant up 50% of existing off-street parking spaces. Special Exception as per Article 41 section 401, to allow bar/lounge open to the public within the CBD District. Class H Special Permit as per Article 15, Section 1511, for any development between Biscayne Bay and the first dedicated right-of-way. Class 11 Special Permit as per Article 4, Section 401, for temporary construction fence and covered walkway. Class II Special Permit as per Article 4, Section 401, for development of new construction within the CBD Distreit. Class II Specials Permit per Article 9, section 908.9, for development on Biscayne Boulevard. Class II Special Permit as per Article 9, Section 908.2, for access from a public street roadway width greater than 25 feet. Class 31 Special permit as per Article 15, Section 1512, waiver of Guides and Standards and guidelines, for 5 feet driveway from property Une. Class I Special Permit as per Article 9, Section 915.2, for FAA clearance letter, Submitted into the , public • recor in connection with item on ��o Walter Fceman City Clerk TnTAI P. AP 00--1137 • Class I Special Permit as per Article 9, Section 906.6, for pool/outdoor recreation area. Class I Special Permit as Article 9, Section Section 91.7.2.11 to allow valet parking for residential and other uses. Class I Special Permit as per Article 9, Section 925.3.$, to allow developmeuticonstructionlrental signage. Class I Permit as per Article 9, Section 918.2, for parking and staging of construction during construction. Class I Permit as per Article 9, Sectionction 920.1, to allow construction trailer. Request for the following MUSP conditions to be required at time of -shell perin'it instead of at issuance of foundation permit: a. The requirement to provide a letter of assurance for the Solid Waste Department; and b. The requirement to record in the Public Records a Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions providing that the ownership, operation and maintenance of all common areas and facilities will be by the property owner or a mandatory property owner association; and c. The requirement to record in the Public Records a unity of title or covenant in lieu of unity of title. )Designation as a phased development pursuant to Section 2502 of Ordinance No.11000. Request for waiver of Waterfront Charter permission per section 3(mm) (iii) of the Charter. y McPhee Date Zoning Inspector II ® submitted into the public record in connection with item on 1`/�--cv Walter Foeman Cib Clerk Q0-1137 J-98-1128 11/16/98 • REC I 84-07 PG '309$ U 98 R 6:23 4-� 19 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION, WITH ATTACHMENTS, APPROVING WITH CONDITIONS, A MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT, PURSUANT TO ARTICLES 13 AND 17 OF ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 11000, FOR THE ONE MIAMI PROJECT, TO BE LOCATED AT THE PROPERTIES GENERALLY BOUNDED BY SOUTHEAST 2ND AVENUE ON THE WEST, BISCAYNE BOULEVARD- WAY AND THE MIAMI RIVER ON THE SOUTH, BISCAYNE BAY ON THE EAST AND SOUTHEAST 2ND AND.3RD STREETS ON THE NORTH, MIAMI, FLORIDA; TO BE COMPRISED OF A PHASED PROJECT DEVELOPMENT, CONSISTING OF 300 HOTEL ROOMS, 1500 RESIDENTIAL UNITS, 400,000 SQUARE FEET OF RETAIL, 1,200,000 SQUARE FEET OF OFFICE AND 7000 PARKING SPACES WITH ACCESSORY AMENITY SPACES AND RECREATIONAL USES; DIRECTING TRANSMITTAL OF THE HEREIN RESOLUTION; MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATING CONCLUSIONS OF LAW; PROVIDING FOR BINDING EFFECT; CONTAINING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. E WHEREAS, on September 11, 1998, Miami One Centre, Inc., ("APPLICANT"), submitted a complete Application for Major Use Special Permit for the One Miami Project ("PROJECT") pursuant to Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, Articles 13 and 17, for the property generally bounded by Southeast 2nd Avenue on the west, Biscayne Boulevard Way and the Miami River on the south, Biscayne Bay on the east and Southeast 2nd and 3rd Streets on the north, Miami, Florida,,as legally described on Exhibit "A" to be comprised of a EA 7 7-A El X7 f�1 CITY COmaSSIOm METING OF NOV 17 1998 RAWOlutbn No. 00-11907 OFF *Submitted into the public REC9 840 PG 3099 record in connection with item on J-24i L-1lw phased mixed use development project; and Walter Foeman City Clerk WHEREAS, development of the PROJECT requires the issuance of a Major Use Special Permit pursuant to Article 17 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended; and WHEREAS, the Planning Advisory Board, at its meeting of November 12, 1998, Item No. 5, following an advertised public hearing, adopted Resolution No. PAB 72-98, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of the PROJECT for a Major Use Special Permit, subject to APPLICANT complying with all conditions .of the Development Order for the the PROJECT, by a vote of five to zero (5-0); and WHEREAS, the City Commission deems it advisable and in the best interest of the general welfare of the City of Miami to issue a Major Use Special Permit. Development Order for the PROJECT as hereinafter set forth; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. The recitals and findings contained in the Preamble to this Resolution are hereby adopted by reference thereto and incorporated herein as if fully set forth in this Section. Section 2. A Major Use Special'Permit Development Order, attached hereto as Exhibit "B" and made a part hereof, is hereby approved subject to the conditions specified in said Development Order, per Article 17 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, as amended, - 2 - 00-1137 • , 0 Rcc 18409?c 3100 * for the One Miami Project '(hereinafter referred to as the "PROJECT") to be developed by Miami One Centre, Inc. ("APPLICANT"), for the property generally bounded by Southeast 2nd Avenue on the west, Biscayne Boulevard Way and the Miami River on the south, Biscayne Bay on the east and Southeast 2nd and 3rd Streets on the north, Miami, Florida, as legally described on Exhibit "A", attached hereto and made a part hereof. Section 3. The PROJECT is hereby approved for the construction of up to 300 hotel rooms, 1500 residential units, 400,000 square feet of retail, 1,200,000 square feet of office and 7000 parking spaces with accessory amenity spaces and -= recreational uses. Section 4. The findings of fact set forth below are hereby made with respect to the subject PROJECT: a. The PROJECT is in conformity with the adopted Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000, as amended. b. The PROJECT is in accord with the applicable CBD Zoning classification of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, the a E Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, as 0 LT U amended. c ® � c. The total PROJECT is expected to cost approximately $1 is billion, and to employ approximately 1,540 workers a during construction (FTE), and 160 annual recurring In �' jobs. The PROJECT will generate approximately $17.4 million annually in recurring Ad Valorem tax revenues to local units of government (1998 dollars); of this amount, approximately $5.7 million will go to City -3- ® RED 184G9 PG 3101 operating, approximately $285,000 will go to City Miscellaneous, and approximately $1 million will go to City debt service. d. The City Commission further finds that: (1) the development program proposed for the PROJECT will have a favorable impact on the economy of the City; (2) the development program proposed. for the PROJECT will efficiently use public transportation facilities; (3) any potentially adverse effects of the PROJECT will be mitigated through compliance with the conditions of this Major Use Special Permit; (4) the development program proposed for the PROJECT will favorably affect the need for people to find adequate housing, office and hotel and retail uses reasonably accessible to other locations within downtown MiamiCU c E - U n•c ® (5) the development program proposed for the PROJECT o LL v will efficiently use necessary public utilities; o c � car vl (6) the development program proposed for the PROJECT :d will not negatively impact the environment and = Q E natural resources of the City; co 2? m (7) the development program proposed for the PROJECT will not adversely affect conditions in the • - 4 - 00-1137 (?) E • R« 18 0 Pu 3102 neighborhood; (8) the development program proposed for the PROJECT will not adversely affect.public safety; (9) based on the record presented and evidence presented, the public welfare will be served by the development program proposed for the PROJECT; and (10) any potentially adverse effects of the PROJECT arising from safety and security, fire protection and life safety, solid waste, heritage conservation, trees, minority participation and employment, and minority contractor/subcontractor participation will be mitigated through compliance with the conditions of this Major Use Special Permit. Section 5. The Major Use Special Permit, as approved and amended, shall be binding upon the applicants, owners and any successors in interest. Section 6. The application for Major Use Special Permit, which was submitted on September 11, 1998, as amended, and is on file with the Department of Planning and'Development of the City of Miami, Florida, shall be relied upon generally for administrative interpretations and is made a part hereof by reference. Section 7. This Major Use Special Permit will expire two (2) years from its effective date which is thirty (30) days after Submitted into the public record in pnnection with 0 m 113 9 item 2— 6 on _I �41!:tL _ - 5 - Walter Foeman RtiC 18409 PC 3 ! 03 • the adoption of the herein Resolution. Section 8. The City Manager is hereby directed to instruct the Director of the Department of Planning and Development to transmit a copy of this Resolution and attachments to the developers: Miami One Centre, Inc., Blue Lake Management, 5000 Blue Lake, #150, Boca Raton, FL. 33431. Section 9. The Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law are made with respect to the Project as described in the Development Order for the One Miami Development Project, which is attached hereto as Exhibit "B" and made a part hereof by reference. Section 10. The Major Use Special Permit Development Order for the One Miami Development Project (Exhibit "B") is hereby granted and issued. Section 11. In the event that any portion or section of this Resolution or the Development Order (Exhibit "B") is determined to be invalid, illegal, or unconstitutional by a court or agency of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall in no manner affect the remaining portions of this Resolution or Development Order (Exhibit "B") which shall remain in full force and effect. Section 12. This Resolution shall become effective thirty Submitted into -the public record in c nnectio Frith item Z— on J.20 Walter Foeman City Clerk, 011 18409 PG 3184 REC o(30) days after its adoption1l. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 17th day of Nov m r , 1998. ATTEST: WALTER J. FOE CITY CLERK JOE CAROLLO, MAYOR MAN In accordance with Miami Code Se c;nce fhieklavor this legislation by signing it in the designated )iaca p:'c`, ids ) becomes effective with the dapaG cf� ie:n (10) days from the date of Golann ss C. ;.:::_:., regarding same, without the Mayor exercisin a eto. Kaltq�d: aman, City Clerk = , APPROVED AS TO FORM AND COR�CTNESS X- - ALEJANDRO VII,A�&ELL10 — PIT ,Y-- A't"TORNEY ,3'0 41 : GMM : C sk : BS S 1� This Resolution shall become effective as specified herein unless vetoed by the Mayor within ten days from the date it was passed and adopted. If the Mayor vetoes this Resolution, it shall become effective immediately upon override of the veto by the City Commission or upon the effective date stated herein, whichever is later. Submitted into the public ® recor in item �'� connection with on /2 114Jq Walter roeman City Clerk - 7 - 00-1137 -- '- - t 70 E • C7 "1 18409 3 5 RU Project Legal Description Parcel A ONE MIAML All of Tract D, Block 1, DU PONT PLAZA, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 50, Page 11, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, LESS that portion of Tract D described as follows: Begin at the Northeast comer of said Tract D and run West along the North line of Tract D for a distance of 645.94 feet to a Point of Curvature; thence Southwesterly along a circular curve to the left, having a radius of 25.00 feet, a central angle of 61 026'00" for an arc distance of 26.81 feet to a Point of Compound Curvature; thence Southerly along a circular curve to the left, having a radius of 300.00 feet, a central angle of 28034'00" for an arc distance of 149,57 feet to a point of tangency; thence run South for a distance of 293.50 feet (said last mentioned four courses being coincident with the boundary lines of said Tract D); thence run East for a distance of 179.41 feet; thence run North for a distance of 150.00 feet; thence run East for a distance, f 525.36 feet; thence run North 00°04'07" West along the East line of said Tract D for a distance of 300.00 feet to the Point of Beginning, lying and being in Dade County, Florida. Parcel B All of Block 3, DU PONT PLAZA, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 50, Page 11, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida_ Parcel C Lots 1 through 8, both inclusive, Block 2, DU PONT PLAZA, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 50, Page 11, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. Parcel D All of Block 4, DU PONT PLAZA, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 50, Page 11, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. Submitted into the public record in connection with item s on L21l_I 1-/29- Exhibit A Walter Foeman City Clerk, REC 18409 3106 EXHIBIT "B" DEVELOPMENT ORDER ATTACHMENT TO RESOLUTION NO. DATE: ONE MIAMI PROJECT MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT _DEVELOPMENT ORDER Let it be known that pursuant to Articles 13 and 17 of Ordinance No. 11000, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended, the Commission of the City of Miami, Florida, has considered in a public hearing, the issuance of a ;z. Major Use Special Permit to be comprised of a Phased Development -_ to consist of mixed uses for the One Miami Project (hereinafter referred to as the "PROJECT") to be located at the properties generally bounded by Southeast 2nd Avenue on the west, Biscayne Boulevard Way and the Miami River on the south, Biscayne Bay on the east and'Southeast 2nd and 3rd Streets on the north, Miami, Florida; see legal description in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and made a part hereof; said legal description is subject to any dedications, limitations, restrictions, reservations or easements of record. After due consideration of the recommendations of the Planning Advisory Board and after due consideration of the consistency of this proposed development with the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan, the City Commission has approved the -PROJECT, and subject to the following conditions approves the Major Use Submitted into the public tern recOr Zn onneC2icn With 0 O _ 113 1' B _ JAfalter Foernan City Clerk �7 °C18409 3IOT Special Permit and hereby issues this Permit: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Submitted into the public record in connection wish item 2L&L on u- f l H- Walter Foernai i City Clerk The proposed One Miami Project is a Phased Mixed Use Project which will occupy the properties generally bounded by Southeast 2nd Avenue on the west, Biscayne Boulevard Way and the Miami River on the south, Biscayne Bay on the east and Southeast 2na and 3rd Streets on the north, Miami, Florida; see legal description in Exhibit "A", ( "PROJECT") . The PROJECT is=- located on approximately 14.19 gross acres and 8.98 net acres of land (more specifically described in Exhibit "A", incorporated herein by reference). The remainder of the PROJECT's VITAL DATA is attached hereto as Exhibit 1101, and incorporated herein by reference. The proposed PROJECT. is hereby approved for the construction of up to 300 hotel rooms, 1,500 residential units, 400,000 square feet of retail, 1,200,000 square feet of office and 7,000 parking spaces with accessory amenity spaces and recreational uses. The Project shall not be constructed until such time that each individual phase undergoes approvalas a substantial modification of this permit; said approvals shall require all customary reviews required for a' Major Use Special Permit REC 18409 PG 3 (08 ig • • including the Large Scale Development Committee and the Urban Development Review Board. The mix and scale of uses proposed for the PROJECT conform to the requirements of the CBD Zoning District, as contained in Ordinance No. 11000, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended. The existing comprehensive plan future land use designation allows the proposed mix and intensity of uses. Submitted into the public:. record in connection "with Item .! on M Walter Foeman City Clerk PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT THE APPLICANT, ITS SUCCESSORS, AND/OR ASSIGNS, JOINTLY OR SEVERALLY, SHALL COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING FOR EACH PHASE OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM APPROVED HEREIN: 1. Meet all applicable building codes, land development regulations, ordinances and other laws.. 2. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, provide the City with a list of agencies from which approvals and/or permits must be obtained prior to initiation of development and the permit or approval required of each. 3. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, record a certified copy of the development order in the Public Records of Miami -Dade County that specifies that the Development Order runs with the land and is binding on the B-3 00-1137 • °'E'C 184,09 _?G_ 3109 0 • E E Applicant, its successors, and assigns, jointly or severally. 4. Allow the Miami Police Department to conduct a security survey, at the option of the Department, so as to make recommendations concerning security measures and systems; further submit a report to the Department of Planning and Development, prior to commencement of construction, demonstrating how the Police Department recommendations, if any, have been incorporated into the PROJECT security and construction plans, or demonstrate to the Planning Director why such recommendations are impractical. 5. Provide a letter from the Department of Fire -Rescue indicating APPLICANT'S coordination with members of the Fire Plans Review Section of the Department of Fire -Rescue for the review of the scope of the PROJECT, owner responsibility, building development process and review procedures, as well as specific requirements for fire protection and life safety systems, egress, vehicular access and water supply. 6. Provide a letter of assurance from the Solid Waste Department that the PROJECT has addressed all concerns of said Department. 7. Prepare a Minority Participation and Employment Plan to be submitted to the City's Director of Minority and Women Business Affairs for review and comments, with the understanding that the City's Minority/Women Business Affairs and Procurement Ordinance No. 10538 is a guide that the APPLICANT must use its best efforts to follow. 8. Prepare a Minority Contractor/Subcontractor Participation Plan to the City's Director of Minority and Women Business Affairs for review and comma 'w thntt�h�1eaD r0standing that to r� reco item � on _LL1_r !± h B-4 Walter Foeman City Clerk RED I 8409Pc* 3110 �► the City's Minority/Women- Business Affairs and Procurement Ordinance No. 10538 is a guide that the APPLICANT must use its best efforts to follow. 9. Record in the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida, a Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions providing that the ownership, operation and maintenance of all common areas and facilities will be by the property owner or a mandatory property owner association in perpetuity.' 10. Provide the City with an executed, recordable unity of title or covenant in -lieu of unity of title agreement for the subject property; said agreement shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Attorney's Office. 11. The applicant shall provide plans for proposed sidewalk and swale area improvements prior to the issuance of a building permit; said plans shall be subject to review and approval by the Public Works Department and the Department of Planning and Development. 12. Provide the Department of Planning and Development with a temporary parking plan which addresses construction employee parking during the construction period; said plan shall be subject to the. review and approval by the Department of Planning and Development prior to the issuance of any building permits. 13. The applicant shall retain the services of an archeological consultant who will be responsible for conducting archeological monitoring of all ground disturbing activity, as. well as the subsequent recovery of artifacts; said consultant shall obtain a scope of work from the Miami -Dade County Archeologist and shall provide reports to both that Submitted into the public record,in c nnection with item on Walter Foeman .� .. _ . B - 5 City Clergy � .. 00-1137 18409 3111 • office and the City of Miami Preservation Officer. 14. Apply for a substantial modification review and approval for each of the phases proposed within this Major Use Special Permit; each phase shall require approval of the design component including right-of-way improvements, facade treatment, signage, lighting, etc.; no phase of the project shall be constructed until such time that said approvals are obtained; said approvals shall require all customary reviews required for a Major Use Special Permit, including the Planning Advisory Board, Large Scale Development Committee and the Urban Development Review Board. THE CITY SHALL: Subject to payment of all applicable fees due, establish the effective date of this Permit as being thirty (30) days from the date of its issuance; the issuance date shall constitute the commencement of the thirty (30) day period to appeal from the provisions of the'Permit. The development program proposed for the One Miami Project by the applicant, Miami.One Centre, Inc., ("Applicant"), complies with the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000, is consistent with the orderly development and goals of the City of Miami, and complies with local land development regulations, and it is further found, pursuant to Section 1703 of Zoning Ordinance Submitted into the public 0 0 -113 A record in connection with item _ A on �-Ly1O Walter Foeman City Clerk FAA °EC 184.09 PG 3112 ® No. 11000 that: (1) the development program proposed for the PROJECT will have a favorable impact on the economy of the City; and (2) the development program proposed for the PROJECT will efficiently use public transportation facilities; and (3) the development program proposed for the PROJECT will favorably affect the need for people to find adequate housing, office space and hotel and retail uses within the downtown area; and (4) the development program proposed for the PROJECT will efficiently use necessary public facilities; and (5) the development program proposed for the PROJECT will not negatively impact the environment and natural resources of the City; and (6) the PROJECT will not adversely affect public safety; and (7) the development program proposed for the public welfare will be served by the PROJECT; and (8) any potentially adverse effects of the PROJECT will bE mitigated through the conditions of this Major USE Special Permit. EU E off_ W w0 U 0 a 0 "i c v � c au . E -a v E The proposed development program does not unreasonably interfere with the achievement of the objectives of the adopted State Land Development Plan applicable to the City of Miami. Pursuant to Section 1305 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, the specific site plan aspects of the PROJECT i.e., ingress and egress, offstreet parking and loading, refuse and service areas, signs and lighting, utilities, drainage and control of B-7 00-1137 v �s I8409 3113 is potentially adverse effects generally, have been considered and will be further considered administratively during the process of approving each individual phase and issuing individual building permits and certificates of occupancy. • Submitted into the public recur in onnection with item on Walter Foeman Citi Clerk l� • REC 184�9 PG 31 4 • EXHIBIT "C" 49 ONE MIAML MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT Project Data Sheet 1. Legal Description: See attached Exhibit "1" under the Project Information. 2. Location: Parcel A is located adjacent to the Intercontinental Hotel podium on the north, the Miami River on the south, Biscayne Bay on the east and Biscayne Boulevard on the west. Parcel B is rectangular in shape and surrounded by Southeast 3`d Street on the north, Biscayne Boulevard. Way/Southeast 4"' Street on the south, Biscayne Boulevard on the east and Southeast 3` Avenue on the west. Parcel C is rectangular in shape and surrounded by Southeast 3'd Street on the north, Biscayne Boulevard Way/Southeast 4t' Street on the south, Southeast 31d Avenue on the -east and Southeast 2"d Avenue on the west. Parcel D is rectangular in shape and surrounded by Southeast 2"d Street on the north, Southeast 3 d Street on the south, Southeast 3`d Avenue on the east and Southeast 2"d Avenue on the west. 3. Zoning Classification: Central Business District (CBD). 4. Lot Area: Gross Lot Area: 14.19 acres (618,116.4 sq. ft.) Net Lot Area: 8.98 acres (391,168.8 sq. ft.) 5. Density: Units Per Acre Permitted: 1000 units/acre. Units Per Acre Provided: Parcel A - 300 dwelling units; and 300 hotel rooms(equiv. 150 dwelling units)/3.04 net acres = 148 units per acre. _Parcel B - 1,200 dwelling units/2.46 net acres = 488 units per acre. Parcels A & B - 1,500/ dwelling units and 300 hotel rooms (equiv. 150 dwelling units)/5.5 net acres = 300 units per acre. Submitted into the public record in c nnection with item on Walter Foeman. City Clerk 00-1137 REC 18409 �- 3115 O N I M I A M I- PROJECT DATA SHEET (Cant.) 6. Floor Area Ratio Permitted: Unlimited. 7. Loading Berths: 8. Height Permitted: 9. Building Footprint: 10. Parking Spaces • Handicapped spaces: • To be provided at time of the substantial - modification to the MUSP. Unlimited. To be provided at time of the substantial modification to the MUSP. 300 Room Hotel. No minimum/450 spaces maximum/225 provided. Conference Center 100,000 sq. ft. No minimum/1000 spaces maximum/100 provided. 300 Condominium units. No minimum / 600 spaces maximum / 600 provided. 1,200 Apartment units. No minimum / 2400 spaces maximum / 1500 provided. 1,200,000 sq. ft. of Office 1200 minimum 12000 maximum / 2000 provided. 400,000 sq. ft. of Retail. No minimum / 1333 maximum / 900 provided. Commercial Parking No minimum / no maximum / 1,675 provided. The percentage of handicap spaces provided will be as defined by the Florida Accessibility Code. Submitted into the public 00-1137 record 2J5 nne 31�.Lc�L item— on Walter Foeman s /� City Clerk Of' 18409 P� 3116 REC • L ONEMIAML 11. Open Space: To be provided at time of the substantial modification to the MUSP. 12. Setbacks: Adjacent to all streets - 5 feet. Interior - zero feet. Rear - zero feet. MIAMI/PARDOA/977C31 Awvr9l !.DOC/9/O&98 • Submitted into the public record in �coynnection with r- item �._ on a Walter Foeman City Clerk 00-113'7 • E • E RC 18409Pc 31 IT, EC STATE OF FLORIDA ) RECORDER IN CFFIw,4 REC9P+..�S COUNTY OF DADE ) OFDADECOU,v,Ty, cLgRjD,q' RECORD v!/�iplp CITY OF MIAMI �lA y� Rt" ) CGS.',: �i t1�.i.4.s- I, WALTER J. FOEMAN, City Clerk of the City of Miami, Florida, and keeper of the records thereof, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing page numbered 1 through 19, inclusive, constitute a true and correct copy of a Resolution with attachments passed and =' adopted by the City Commission at the meeting held on the 17`h day of November,1998. SAID RESOLUTION WAS DESIGNATED AS RESOL UTION NO. 98-11 Sl. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hereunto set my hand and impress the official seal of the City of Miami, Florida this 18`4 day of December, 1998. WALTER J. FOEMAN City Clerk Miami, Florida By� ©� Deputy Clerk (OFFICIAI. , L>) ..` p`" CCRP as Submitted into the record in onnection ublic item on —L2 LL1(w Walter Foemen 00-113'7 �";R i + ) w Y W I� a k K ' 75 SHr'f1 ._ CD y Ask Az �CI 7�,t •G�'. �;r �' 1 ` II I 1 I I f T • 1� . l �. e. �. CCCCrCLCt'fCCL [i [ f''[[[rrr- LI - ' CU, CL[Lr 1 J P CCl LC I �Cfl [ O-+ I i,n�LCtri u �:1 r T L �[cic[LI,=� nL�[lf; CCL4Ll�Cn-i L! [CL� CILi ril it ►.� �. ffRL L�LL ERE, CLQ, � ! vL, Ifn777777 /' 4; 1 MINI, ,� - 's.`V fit �I •G �:. � � ;�, Li ,t s'�•pp�: �~ �� .�-�. Ida 1 .'E� �r �, ; � • _ b • t �\ 'll /� �,II � , 11 rEt .>t t • • • ®177E //f7®/ 7171 PROJECT DATA I- SITE LOCATION: 205 SOUTH BISCAYNE BOULEVARD, MIAMI FLORIDA NET LOT AREA: 3.04 ACRES GROSS LOT AREA: 4.9 ACRES ZONING: CBD CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT COMMERCIAL FLOOR AREA RATIO: UNLIMITED MAXIMUM NUMBER OF APARTMENTS: 1,500 UNITS (500/ACRE) II- SETBACKS (CITY OF MIAMI REQUIRED PROPOSED FRONT 5'-0" 5'-0" REAR 0'-0" 0'-0" SIDE 0'-0" 0'-0" BUILDING HEIGHT UNLIMITED 476'-3" CHARTER PROVISION 50'-0" 20'-0" to 36'-8" III- OPEN SPACE CRITERIA: F.A.R. — (50,000)/ 50 = (532,421 + 623,348) — 50,000/ 50 = 1,105,769/ 50 TOTAL = 22,115 S.F. REQUIRED PROPOSED 22,115 S.F. 69,069 S.F. IV- RESIDENTIAL TOWER GROSS AREA :626,552 S.F. F.A.R. AREA :532,421 S.F. . NUMBER OF UNITS :425 UNITS NUMBER OF FLOORS :49 HEIGHT AT ROOF :467'-0" N.G.V.D. PARAPET HEIGHT :518'70" N.G.V.D. V- OFFICE TOWER GROSS AREA :707,025 S.F. F.A.R. AREA :623,348 S.F NUMBER OF FLOORS :34 HEIGHT AT ROOF :476'-3" N.G.V.D. PARAPET HEIGHT :513'-7" N.G.V.D. TYP.GROSS FLR. AREA :22,610 S.F. VI- PARKING GARAGE NUMBER OF FLOORS :12 OFFICE: ANCILLIARY USE: CRITERIA: 1 PKG./500 S.F. OF RENTABLE No. OF PKG.: 600,541 S.F./ 500 S.F. =1,201 PKG. SPACES ANCILLIARY USE: CRITERIA :1 PKG/1,000 S.F. No. OF PKG.:2,972 S.F./1,000 S.F. = 3 PKG. SPACES TOTAL PKG SPACES =1,204 Submitted into the public record in connection with item on Li4.�wJr&- Walter Foeman City Clerk Go -1131,611 • • RESIDENTIAL: ANCILLIARY USE: CRITERIA: No. UNITS @1.3 + 10% VISITORS . No. UNITS 425@1.3 = 553 + 10% VISITORS = 596 SPACES ANCILLARY USE:CRITERIA:1 PKG/1,000 S.F. No. OF PKG.:2,909 S.F./1,000 S.F. = 3 PKG. SPACES TOTAL PKG SPACES = 599 TOTAL PROVIDED :1,834 SPACES OFFSTREET LOADING: REQUIRED: PROVIDED: (4) BERTH 12'x 35' (4) BERTH 12'x 35' (2) BERTH 12'x 55' (2) BERTH 12'x 55' RESIDENTIAL: AREA /F.A.R. LEVEL AREA No. OF FLOORS SUB -TOTAL GROUND 4,377 1 4,377 MEZZ 0 1 0 LEVEL 3 8,606 1 8,606 4,5 & 6 11,447 3 34,341 .7,8,9,10,11,12 &13 12,376 7 86;632 POOL 12,376 1 12,376 15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39,40,41 & 42 12,243 28 342,804 43,44 &45 10,275 3 30,825 46,47 & 48 3,115 3 9,345 49 3,115 1 3,115 TOTAL No. FLOORS = 49 TOTAL 532,421 S.F. OFFICE: AREA /F.A.R. LEVEL AREA No. OF FLOORS SUB -TOTAL GROUND 9,429 1 9,429 MEZZ - B2 3,992 1 3,992 MEZZ - B3 7,428 1 7,428 MEZZ - B4 11,562 1 11,562 5, 6 , 7 14,113 3 42,339 8, 9,10 19,479 3 58,434 11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22 20,162 12 242,028 23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34 20,678 12 248,136 TOTAL No. FLOORS = 34 TOTAL 623,348 S.F. Submitted into the public recor in connection with item ( on Walter Foeman City Clerk 00-113'7 07/21/2000 * * * 4PUBLIC VALUE INQUIRY * * * PTXM0186 FOLIO 01 0114 030 1041 PROP ADDR MCD 0101 0 NAME AND LEGAL VALUE HISTORY L. -MI ONE CENTRE LTD PARTNERSHIP YEAR 1998 1999 05/02/2000 301 YAMATO RD #3101 LAND 8362789 9838575 BOCA RATON FL BLDG MARKET 8362789 9838575 33431 3.01 AC ASSESS 8362789 9838575 DUPONT PLAZA PB 50-11 HEX TR D BLK 1 LESS BEG NE COR OF WVD TR D TH W645.94FT SWLY ALG A/D TOT EX 26.81FT SLY149.57FT S293.50FT TAXABLE 8362789 9838575 E179.41FT N150FT E525.36FT N30OFT TO POB STATE EXEMPT: LOT SIZE 131181 SQ FT OR 18341-2334 1198 5 (4) SALE DATE 03/1980 SALE AMT 3434000 SALE TYPE 6 I/V V SALE O/R 10703-516 PF1-MORE LEGAL PF2-PARCEL INFO PF3-FOL SRCH PF5-TAX COLL PF7-PREV OWNER PF_8-MENU PF13--OCCUP LIC DC999999 FOLIO IS IN CANCELLED,STATUS FOR THE 2000 TAX ROLL • • Submitted into the public record -,in connection with item on .LLLLc±& Walter Foeman City Clerk �. 1998 Nov ! 3s 65 f? .%c C Pli . 0 F' �'�'• 920 — SPECIAL. WAR$A'DEED Kc' 18341 PG Zi34 TWS 174DENTUR£, made this•? day of 199LF byMIAh11i CEN-MR JOINT VrN URE, a Florida general partnership having an address at clo World Financial Properties, L P , One Liberty Plaza, New York, New York 10006 (*Grantor"). in Favor of Mtnet One Centre Lie ted Partaserahip a Florida chatted pertnrrnhlp , having in address at 301 Ynoato ttos0 d7101. Onra ttatoo, FLorido 3343t WRNHSSE-M that Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars (51 a 00) in hand ptid and other good and valuable considexatiom the receipt and sufciency of which are hereby acknowledged, try these presents does GRANT, SELL and CONVEY unto Grantee, its successors and assigns the following described real property: Being that certain tr= of land looted is Dade County, Florida and being more particularly descitbed on Schedule A attached hereto and made apart hereof together with an _ improvements, buildings. or fixtures situated or located thereon, and all appurtenant rights• privileges at esseasestts belonging or in any way relating thereto, including but not limited to, au -- interest, if any, ofGnaator in any land lying in or under the bed of any highway, avenue, street, road, alley. memeut or titer tt-of-way. open or proposed, in, on, across, abutting or adjacent to the . . property describtd on Schedule A hereto, tog"Jw with all of Grantor's right, title and interest to any strips and gates withia or bounding the property (all of said property and interest being colitctively referred to herein era the "Property"). TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the Property, together with any and all the rights and appurtenances thereto in anywise belonging to Grantor. unto Grantee, its successors and assigns FORE• VBJL Graatar, for itself and its successors, does covenant, promise and agree, to and with Grantee that Ceantar has not stone or suffered to be done, anything whereby the Property hereby granted is, or atay be, in any manner oncaunbered or charged, subject, however, to M easements, covenants, agreements, restrictions and resesvelians of record, if any. Grantor does hereby warrant and agree to defend title to the Property against the lawful claims of all persons claiming by, through or tinder Grantor. but not otherwise, subject to all easements, covenants, agreements, restrictions and reservtttions ofrecord, if any. This iasuument is executed and delivered pursuant to an Order Confirming ! Amended Plan of Rtorgaaizat an of Miami Center Joint Venture pursuant to Chapter I 1 of the United States Bankniptcy Coda (the *Order") dated September 18, 1997 of the United States Bankruptcy Cotat, Southern District of New York (the 'Bankruptcy Court"), and entered on September I9, 1997 on the docket in the case of In re Mtiarni Cenrg !Dint Venture. Debtor Dccumerrtory Starng: Co.lect:o $ 5UFTAX Ux. ::3r-p: C� fitted c Jrrru r.r_ I�oworra.00t Class "C" lnton0ible Yet r•ott.clecr • r csa?:t•Cy�?i�.. .lcrk, U�•:•: C<,•1[,� f, flues t.�t.�� '4S!,'-'�' ; �'��"� � }"• "•'�'Lsif�C .:i7Ua _•.ar-r.�.v,er ru.....:.. .,. � . _ _.�.. �r- • . '.•...e: rr .�. "r .4 ,• :t. ) �'i.•: '• •`L' .. Nr , ,,,: �. •�'L "�i-1'et'A'�'q•�`•.�1::'to the Rd 1, W'71`t'!ii"'.1�•,�:1:�� ,yi? ':�1.'•i"i','.".i. -'c .�4 •` " _ tU u'��ls.eJ ,•i/ Zu M-linection ":.i.s [t'' _ w.`� �.ri.'� -r 4"=•r. .. 1110M •�n �? with . ; ,.Walter F oeman �r••.:-:rc •7i=r.. ,�S:r.S .-:':, T - l it'/ Clerk ..." i'" °ry ,,B.Ufii .a l9le[ilt"~FC^}. .�.:'_"^:_S•J�+':,. '2� �: .G�i:.: _ .t5�_� __ 00-113 • -sic 18341 «23M (M4= 11 Case No. 96 B 44892 (ILG)), which Order provides for the trsasCerof the said �-• -. ptaaniaes puma•__• ro this ia>atrt+met: IN WIT14ESS WHEREOF{ Grantor has caused its manse to be sued to these prc=ts the day and year first above written. Witrsessed: MIAAQ CENTER IOINT VENTURE By: WFP Florida Equity Grp., M=40ng ay. ' pier Nitmse: E1a.incrli 0 �. i ra r By: n Name: Tsh.+ A. Maws. By:IZ.=. I. ... Turtle: E t i.twl V% 1 a- d11 ei !.µ ; i-�.nanLIt Name: X_sfii.]al., ►�,.e Tars Pnrcei LD. Nos.: 01 0114 030 1041 010114 030 1050 010114 030 1270 010114 030 1130 After recordin& taus document should be returned to: _7- Submitted into the public record in connection with item on/�, Walter Foeman City Clerk r:+oocstissr►t xr usmsons4o.rs IatI97. �. •,. ,:. r.l �. '•r,+:'. �:-�-:''�'..•••�. �.._-jet: 'tit...'_-...'��:f•�l'= -1?-::i•�_ _~'5�..:•.i-; ... ••�'+•ri .r �;,�• � j.•, i�,`;•r t t•.. �:<< , IT•;t� .._ _'• _,j D :ty'.'yiw r:i i ` ��,:�•'r .°., c • • oil . l etc (1 rc . STATE OF COUNTY Of IZA n the a day of �+ �&V 1992 before me personally came ++r— to me (mown, who being by me duly sworn, did depose and say he resides at ✓-1`a �Z t.,--A_ t0l u that he is the secs s , r;,E L. - 315t^•-..:1- -of WFP Florida Equity Corp., the corporation which is described in and which executed the foregoing instrument; which corporation is the general pa.mer of MIAha CENTER j()rNT VENTURE, the pattmship which c=utcd the foregaing iostruurcnt; that the execution orthe , lruuaa>es>s by WFP Fbarida 1AVjity Corp. wan duly authorized jeCMtfing to the partnership agrccummt of said paMxnWP; that the gc=al partner executed the iavxurn== on behalf of the uid partnership pumiant to said authoriution and that he knows the seat of said corporatioa; that Jz Seal affixed to Said insuvmcm is such corporatc seal; that it was so affixed by authority of The board of &ectors of said corporation, and that he signed his name, thereto by lilxe authority. Notary Public, State of „c+. MrMes Sq pt Name printed: G{uuRaa Eft New Yah oa..reau+Ee.ra.=C 9 -ILI? `3 My Commission Expires: ?u .14y Commission No.: l�~'�11••�d �•� [NOTARIAL SEAL] •'z Submitted into the public record in connection with Item &-- f' on _)-2 11l-4� Walter Foeman ctnocsarrt+_w trso!arns�o.o: City Clerk j. !f 12. I..a1,'=+�".�-�'y,i; "`••e�•',•y::. Y.^_i:."'_ir�:4•y w��,.... ..1• il; •'. �� I E�=1.,. nikC• 4a i«.: 'r...r` — :<.� •.��' _r• °v• — -r •n x.. '•al 1.ib4iti�uoiiC�(ir�,.::•;•.;{:':<•:`ii••.ie:.iti�`��:a:uc.•:c_�:r .. •r� ;..:•;: .y., - +'4"•:tc+ci ,a-.' _- %'\. .;ter.}� �- _ ..ti'��: "L, r,. .,:: -'�• .'ry :i :-. :�:. :p_�:' + .Il� h Illll;a�� .I { �,'', ,Y.,r;{:,�::'tr'�•• yt'•• 1 i� {.ry-,=�(.� •: Y,r•-`',�•.. ,'"')rA aV - r,_ _ v.°.-a. _ =tir- .1.. •il . ...y:�:p..;=,~i•t%; w.>.•.'7,tiah:..+i�,N: y� .t��rA.:.... .e'�%ar-�: -_•.yy -1...�..,. _ rrr r�fi:r�' N I I I r I Ji iiilE; �fl ->` s '� •, :..._ .:.- -r ij: 1;1 I' t:._ .� ..1:-:�.}.%.�.��:. _':;�:, t'y '-.: :rr. .:r..; �%: .,t.;:. •�; ��• :. .•:, •`'K. `. 1'.�+• �. i, i itl i liEiiiii3+ � �...`•{�r:•6'.'.T:•!.tPt�s.:�.. ..` 'rtia'<r :: . v ... ._ .i•.�:2C:.. 'o-�.�... ,l, rl I.. �; �:'+.-:-�,•. ..I •.r.:. :'� _ .i..�.iw.v;. .._ -. r, �..� �...? _.,1,.. ,�t•..M.4�:x.r•. aWl I i{i!'r I ill k � ai`f"s':: Mif+Srti+�t'r,. .:�--� .:r,��..5:�; .�t;'%.`d..'.: ..�;:.•,; . .,:: _ _ _ �: �:;S�i T'��.��t•l�;�%;�{,a�'�y1:i,;:j:.:1a;�rr4!.*.c..._.t.'� .. :.':�,+. .I. 11.•�:.,..'..�• 3 s.� . If�t'1. �'��^`'-��=::�".''.-. i : ri• r r I'r� i .... I i .I 11 • �618341 rG M. Lots 1 thru 8 Block 2, Lots 1 thru 14 Block 3, Lots 1 thru 8 Block 4 and Tr D Block 1 of Dupont Plaza, according to the Plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 50, at -Page 11, ofthe PubIIc Records of Dade County, Florida. LESS that Portion of said Tract D des -abed as follows: l3egin at the Ncrthtust corner of said Tract D and run War along the North line of Tract D for 645.94 feet to a point of Curvature; theute Southwesterly along It circular eurva to the left baving a radius Of 25.00 fete card a rearm angle of 61 dcWco 26 minutes 00 seconds for an ere distance of 26.91 fed to a point of Compound Curvature; thence Southerly along a Circular curve to the left having a radius of 300,00 feet and a ctcird angle of28 degrees 34 Mi-ttes 00 seconds for an are dittanee of 149.57 fat to a Point of Tangency, thence South for 293.50 Feet {said last mentioned four courses being coincident with the boundary Gees of said Tract D); dumce cast for 179.41 feet; tlrrnce North for 150.00 feet; thmcc East for 525.36 feet; the = North 00 degrees 04 minutes 07 eaconds West along the bast fine of said Tract D for 300.00 feat to the Point of Beginning. !I ± n�91,tear�pa�o 't 'I � , •d ,accwt7ra �, �pC� 11" ones os a.ae caw, •. r2+oi• HARM RM �c vwv rsiaA+' Submitted into the public record, in co-nsection with item ®n Walter Foeman t:,nocssrra<_rrc_, ramrrs.oas City Clerk A'al•i.::�e!�a.:' -::ter'`—_�_ _ -'i..,a ��' ..ti.• �?-'' 's: � :,tY! utp?cc?�'T• LC••'�7,,.'i� 2': k}.a�; .i:a. .!ise..'"i s,-`':i'-t'`".C?t.-40";:"`1• "!:••:r :.i'an•".P�.. i-�S f: '�"-i- - �S '•fir:; � .�:':7vti•5::.-i. ';t'•.. �L�,:.�.��;4�'� 4 w.- I � •f.' + �v4 .. �jr �. t. .Ja:'•:s • -Zr : . 4'� �Y..; �y. ii• `r�r i; •{.2+�`f,'.t!f.. .v`.: �t .iZ �".�"'. 51•. •!.. • e_;,i::F�:_� .,:; • fig -� :.: ;. • ' .S` '�.\a- , ivy•-, N:;i. '•' ��'�•5i'..•�t ��i.��' ''i`' ;'S.. - ... ••: `'':- .. c r� • CONSUELO M. QUINTANA REAL ESTATE DATA RESEARCHER 1111 SW 11th Avenue, Miami, FL 33129-1820 OFC # 305-858-2287 FAX # 305-859-2439 AUGUST 24, 2000 CITY OF MIAMI PLANNING & ZONING BOARD ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT P.O. BOX 330708 MIAMI, FL 33133 RE: PROPERTY OWNERSHIP LIST 375' FT FROM: (SEE MAP ATTACHED) MIAMI, FL 33131 (STREET ADDRESS) (SEE MAP & LEGAL DESCRIPTION ATTACHED) (LEGAL DESCRIPTION) DADE COUNTY FLORIDA. THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE ATTACHED OWNERSHIP LIST, MAP AND MAILING MATRIX IS A COMPLETE AND ACCURATE REPRESENTATION OF THE REAL ESTATE PROPERTY AND PROPERTY OWNERS 375' FT FROM THE SUBJECT PROPERTY LISTED ABOVE. THIS REFLECTS THE MOST CURRENT RECORDS ON FILE IN THE DADE COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S OFFICE. SINCERELY, C NSUELO M. QUINTANA (MIA-2214) (L-694) (INV-2331) (9 LABELS) Submitted into the Public record in connection with item 2� on _I—&1&1-/C1v Walter Foeman City Clerk 00-113'7 LEGAL DESCRIP"ON: AL- 07 TRACT 0, ELM' 1. DUPONT PLAZA, ACCZRO04G TO -HE PLAT T8EREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT E00K 5150, P A C. 7- -- 1, OF T H P K C RECORDS OF CIADE F,-CRIDA. LESS THAT PORTION OF TRACT C. DEc-CF',9ED AS F�DLLOWS: P. 7-.�sCT D AtZ FILTI WEST ALONG THE NOFT- L,NE OF T1 THE'.. N'D!37AEisf.. nort-w". . �11-,,,� �i-RACIT., D- FOR A C;5 ANCE CE SC-1JT'W1E3TdRU,Y ALONG A CIRCULAR CUP11E 70 :THE LEF-r :0 =o4 4 P.,'-)! W7 :-,F C R =.N VATURE, JP EN D;S- 0 AH ARC -fAN- OF7 TO A POiNT OF SOU 7'1ERLf--.,AL0NG-- C1R,-JLAR CURVE T' THE LEF-,- RADIUS OF F 1 9. 7 3003 -� c"E A C E N T R A h 3LELv - 'JGEEN��Yj --�LNCE SO. 3. 1- 5 BEET �k Po1w, or:�- T,A -(CMD 1-4-T ME1;JTI,:,1NE!D :-00R FCR A STA N E :.;F 2c3'50 E7T -, J SES BEING WITH TH 6:-31UNDARY 2NES CIF Bpi; T AC THENCEEAST FOR 1-19.41 F'z-r7-: THENE . NORTHFOR 7 T: THENCE EAS-, �'OR A DiSTAN-� i50��,.)o FEE E 5253.6 FEET: TYENCE NORTH 00'04'(,7 -ANEST AI-CN-Z; THE LINE CIF 514%0 TRACT, D FOR -' D;S-,ANE OF -.- - ;= - BEING 301DI, TO THE POINT CIF LPEGINNING, LYNG Aiib e;- ;I.j THE CITY 0-- MIAMI, DADE CCL)N7(. 2%-OR!C=k 0 Submitted into the public record in gpnnection with item a-5 on —&-2j-�bc-h—o Walter Foeman City Clerk 00-119 37 (1-4a94L) (V LAbtLJ VVi I rlvu I RCrr- t �V�°:/ \v� �wnv•�... . ..._.., 375FT • Spi EC MATHESON UNSET DR MiH FL 33143 CITY OF MIA DEPT OF P & D CITY OF DIV ASSET MGT 444 SW 2ND AVE #325 MIA FL 33130 MIAMI CENTER JOINT VENTURE % WORLD FIN PROP 165 BROADWAY 6 FLR NEW YORK NY 10006 INTER CONTINENTAL FLA LTD 3RD FLR ACCTG 100 CHOPIN PLAZA MIA FL 33131 DADE COUNTY WASD T STATION USER OX 330316 FL 33233 CRESCENT MIAMI CENTER LLC 777 MAIN ST #2100 FORT WORTH TX 76102 MIAMI ONE CENTRE LTD PTRS 301 YAMATO RD #3101 BOCA RATON FL 33431 S R I MIAMI VENTURE LP % SHORENSTEIN CO LP 200 S BISC BLVD #1670 MIA FL 33131 SWIRE PACIFIC HOLDINGS INC . %SWIRE BRICKELL ONE INC 501 BRICKELL KEY DR #600or . I FL 33131 Submitted into the public record in connection with item on Walter Foeinan Clerk 00-113Q 0 0 0 2 ON O o o a) Cn ma IQ %P11-2 C-) AVE- T T 7- z -40M it .. cn I Mz;v :0 Z4 -n Z (4-85) AV E. / , �yS.E. CA Z --U M o rn 0 � > zr- z> M 0 rn PM D z /: A / M CD Z OM 2 AM= AVE. --.- > z it FIRST AVF_ ----------- Lq: O M La -57 BISCAYNE Submitted into the public record in connection with item on l /5 Walter Foeman City Clerk C O i` yi 00-1137 DUPONT PLAZA PB 50-11 BLOCK 1 (L-694) (11 LABELS) 375FT TRACTS A-B & C BLK 1 LESS ESMT PORTION LEASED TO BRUCE C MATHESON CITY OF MIAMI & LESS BEG 24.99FTE OF X OF SE 2AVE 4940 SUNSET DR & SE 4 ST TH S23.99FT E6.08FT N40.34FT SWLY SELY MIA FL 33143 A/D 17.81 FT TO POB & LESS BEG 114.07FTS & 1.08FTE OF X OF SE 2 AVE & SE 4 ST TH E2.50FT S 2.50FT W2.50FT N2.50FT TO POB & LESS BEG 114.07FTS & 9.08FTE OF X OF SE 2 AVE & SE 4 ST TH E2.50FT S2.50FT W2.50FT N2.50FT TO POB 300 BISC BLVD WAY 01-01143-001-010 PORT OF TRACT A LEASED FOR WALKWAY ALG SE 2ND AVE CITY OF MIA DEPT OF P & D 401 SE 2ND AVE CITY OF DIV ASSET MGT 01-01143-001-011 444 SW 2ND AVE #325 MIA FL 33130 01-01143-001-041 TRACT D LESS BEG NE COR OF TR D TH W645.94FT SWLY ALG A/D MIAMI CENTER JOINT VENTURE 26.81FT SLY149.57FT S293.50FT E179.41FT N150FT % WORLD FIN PROP E525.36FT N30OFT TO POB 165 BROADWAY 6 FLR 201 S BISC BLVD NEW YORK NY 10006 01-3136-079*10001 PORT OF TR D BLK 1 DESC BEG NE COR OF TR D TH INTER CONTINENTAL FLA LTD W645.94FT SWLY ALG AD 26.81 FT SLY149.57FT 3RD FLR ACCTG S293.50FT E179.41FT N150FT E525.36FT N30OFT 100 CHOPIN PLAZA TO POB LESS LIFT STATION AKA MIA CTR CONDO MIA FL 33131 100 CHOPIN PLAZA UNDIV .50% INT IN COMMON ELEMENTS INTER CONTINENTAL FLA LTD MIAMI CENTER CONDOMINIUM 3RD FLR ACCTG 260 BISC BLVD WAY 100 CHOPIN PLAZA 01-3136-079-0010 MIA FL 33131 PORT OF TR D BLK 1 DESC COMM AT MOST NWLY DADE COUNTY WASD COR OF TR D LYG S OF BISCAYNE BLVD WAY LIFT STATION USER' COUNTY USE PO BOX 330316 01-3136-079-0011 MIA FL 33233 UNDIV .50% UNIT OFFICE BLDG INT IN COMMON CRESCENT MIAMI CENTER LLC ELEMENTS OFF REC AREA 777 MAIN ST #2100 201 S BISC BLVD FORT WORTH TX 76102 01-3136-079-0020 BLOCKS LOTS 1 THRU 14 MIAMI ONE CENTRE LTD PTRS 300 SE 3RD ST 301 YAMATO RD #3101 01-01143-001-130 BOCA RATON FL 33431 BLOCK Submitted Into the public ALL BLOCK 5 200 S BISC BLVD record C011neCtl0n with S R I MIAMI VENTURE LP % SHORENSTEIN CO LP 01-01143-001-350 item -P h-L-49 200 S BISC BLVD #1670 _'Mon Walter Foeman MIA FL 33131 City Clerk Q0-1137 11 • BAYFRONT PARK & BANDSHELL PARK #239 SE 2ND ST & NE 6TH ST 401 RISC BLVD BRICKELL KEY ON CLAUGHTON ISLAND SEC 3 PB 119-70 TRS G-H TRS G-H LESS BEG MOST SLY COR OF TR G TH N 23 DEG W606.65FT N 66 DEG E368.01 FT S 23 DEG E 341.45FT SELY & SLY AD 187.51 FT S61 DEG W54.29FT S57 DEG W 11.76FT N23 DEG W5.14FT S 66 DEG W25.89FT TO POB 701 BRICKELL KEY DR 01-4206-051-0010 0 • CITY OF MIA DEPT OF P & D ASSET MGT DIV 444 SW 2ND AVE #325 MIA FL 33130 SWIRE PACIFIC HOLDINGS INC %SWIRE BRICKELL ONE INC 501 BRICKELL KEY DR #600 MIAMI FL 33131 Submitted into the public record in connection With item / on Walter Foeman City Clerk 0®-113'7 rtba +department of 0§tate I certify from the records of this office that THE RELATED GROUP OF FLORIDA is a Florida partnership, filed on September 27, 1999. The document number issued to this registration is GP9900000984.- I further certify said partnership has not been canceled. CR2EO22 (1-99) Submitted into the public record in °O on ct+on with -� item f'- Walter Foeman City Clerk Given under my hand and the Great Seal of the State of Florida at Tallahassee, the Capital, this the Twenty-ninth day of August, 2000 ��x�PrirtE �ttrr`rs . �ELretrxrg nf�5t�zte Epp artmPnt of Ok atP I certify the attached is a true and correct copy of the Partnership Registration Statement of THE RELATED GROUP OF FLORIDA, a Florida partnership, filed on September 27, 1999, as shown by the records of this office. The document number issued to this filing is GP9900000984. CR2EO22 (1-99) Submitted into the public recor in connection with item on Walter Foeman City Clerk Given under my hand and the Great Seal of the State of Florida at Tallahassee, the Capital, this the Twenty-ninth day of August, 2000 �ttt�Eri:rre �ttrri� r �5e>rretrzrg nf��� PARTNEI 3P REGISTRATION STA"Mmw. 1,The Related Group of Flo d • (Name of Partnership) Florida/Dade .3. (State! • 2828 Coral Way, Penthouse - AP - kJ UCL r Quzcza vi 5. 2828 Coral Way. Peath use Miami, Florida 33145 �9��,A (Street A of principal Office in norida. if applrcable) ��P c1' 6. In accordance with s. 620.8105(1)(c)(1 & 2). Florida Statutes, required partner information is provided in one of the following options: Attached is a list of the names and mailing addresses of ALL partners and Florida Registration Numbers, if other than individuals, or. (] The name and street address of the agent in Florida who shall maintain a list of the names and addresses of all partners: IF OTHER THAN INDIVIDUAL, NAME & FLORIDA STREET ADDRESS FLORIDA REGISTRATION _ OF FLORIDA AGENT . If any of the partners are other than individuals, its entity name and Florida Re stra.tioa Number must be listed below: A32336 Related FT on der T TT] Related General Of Florida. LTD_300000138E'i , 2828 Coral Way, Penthouse, Miami, FL 33145-{same a$ r se for both Part ,ershj,0 Partner Entry Name Florida Document Number _ / The execution of this statement as a partner constimtes an affirmation under the penalties of perjury that the facts stated herein are true. Signed this 2lst dayof Se te. 4atP r 19 99By: Relr LTD.. By: ReI In Signatures of TWO Parcness: By: Roberto Rocha, Vice President By: Related Genera of Florida, LTD. _ By: RC Inc By: le I Typed or printed names of partners siagning �e a der, V President �- Sly"muted into. th. public. record' in cormection with - C.7M74(5/95) Cettte pY t> item _2:: On .Z_-1_c0 . 'curt 0fstati8.� Q n��'�' Walter Foeman _.. ..G; y Clerk - 0-113171 i . w LIST OF PARTNER NAMES: 1 tj 1. RELATED FLORIDA, LTD. o FLORIDA REGISTRATION #A32336 ADDRESS: 2828 CORAL WAY PENTHOUSE SUITE ��• MIAMI, FLORIDA 33145 s� 2. RELATED GENERAL OF FLORIDA, LTD. FLORIDA REGISTRATION #A93000001386 ADDRESS: 2828 CORAL WAY PENTHOUSE SUITE MIAMI, FLORIDA 33145 • Submitted into the public record in c nnection with item on �l/,� Walter Foeman City Clerk • Bpp artmpnt of #tatp I certify from the records of this office that MIAMI ONE CENTRE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP is a limited partnership organized under the laws of the State of Florida, filed on September 17, 1998. The document number of this limited partnership is A98000002180. I further certify that said limited partnership has paid all fees due this office through December 31, 2000, and its status is active. CR2E022 (1-99) Submitted into the public record in connection with item on _La=L=�0 Walter Foeman City Clerk Given under my hand and the Great Seal of the State of Florida at Tallahassee, the Capitol, this the Twenty-ninth day of August, 2000 �Kaf jerinB'arri8 �$rrPt�rg IIf�#tttP �'% r ;► 1 43ppaxttunt of #tatr I certify the attached is a true and correct copy of the Certificate of Limited Partnership, as amended to date, of MIAMI ONE CENTRE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a limited partnership organized under the laws of the State of Florida, as shown by the records of this office. The document number of this limited partnership is A98000002180. s. cR2Eo22 (1-99) Submitted into the public record,in c nnection with Item on _%—ILI—Go Walter Foeman (',"h1 ("Iprk Given under my hand and the Great Seal of the State of Florida at Tallahassee, the Capitol, this the Twenty-ninth day of August, 2000 . Rat4 er irw Parris '*erretang uf,�$tate 0O-1137 • • CERTIFICATE OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP OF MIAMI ONE CENTRE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 1. MIAMI ONE CENTRE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP _ (Name of Limited Partnership; must contain suffix such as "Limited", "Ltd.", or "Limited Partnership") 2. 500.0 Blue Lake Drive Suite 150, Boca Raton, FL 33431 (The Business Address of the Limited Partnership) ,fl corq ter_ cn -_- T -T1 3. Fred C. Cohen, Esquire (Name of Registered Agent.for Service of Process). c _ 4.. 712 U.S. Highway One Suite 400 Nor h Palm Beach FM,33-¢80_ (Florida Street Address for ReO2jste d Agent) (Re 4Atere& Agent must sign -here to accept designation as Reg'stered_Agen.t for Service of Process) 6. 5000 Blue Lake Drive Suite 150 Boca Raton, FL 33431 _. (The Mailing Address of -.the Limited Partnership) 7. The latest date upon which the Limited Partnership is to be dissolved is August 31, 2048. 8. NAME OF GENERAL PARTNER(S) SPECIFIC ADDRESS MIAMI ONE CENTRE, INC. 5000 Blue Lake Drive Suite 150 Boca Raton, FL 33431 _- 1 Submitted into the public record in connection with item Z-- on Walter Foeman City Clerk 99!09/98 �� 08:56 F.�T 561 881 9 . CORW CHERNA.Y- - - «r • Signed this T day of September, I998. signature of all General Partners: MIAMI ONE CENTRE, INC. BY' Its Du yAuth dt Representative P Red L. Siegel, GENERAL PARTNER W,dnca �,IjImione\cam . lcd 2 poos 1r Submitted into the public record in connection with item f2ZL. on _lam /_ljU Walter Foeman City Clerk 00-1137 09/09/98 WED M 57 FAX 561- 88109 COHEN, . CHERNAY....- . AFFIDAVIT OF CAPITAL CONTRIBUTIONS BEFORE ME, the undersigned constituting all of the general partners of MIAMI ONE CENTRE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Florida" Limited Partnership, certify as follows: The amount of capital contributions to date of the limited partners is $100.00. The total amount contributed and anticipated to be contributed Xy- . by the limited partners at this time totals .$100.00. Ca This �� _ day of September, 1998. ` O FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NOT. = r. Under the penalties of perjury Ideclare that I have read the foregoing and that the facts alleged are true, to the best 'of my knowledge and belief.. MIAMI ONE CENTRE, INC. By . Its Duly- ori.zea resentative Ned L. Si President Submitted into the public vpdoas\roiamione\affid.cap record in connection with item ` on _" —'-/ yj Walter Foemart City Clerk; 0 010 - FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF STATE Se¢etary of State - SUPPLEMENTAL AFFIDAVIT OF CAPITAL CONTRIBUTIONS FOR A FLORIDA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP The undersigned general partners of MIAMI ONE CENTRE, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Florida Limited Partnership, executed this supplemental affidavit filed pursuant to section 620.112, Florida Statutes. ' The total amount of the capital contributions of the limited partners is: $ 4 000 ,OOQ<00 Tilis 22 day of April =19 99 `,` i C.0 T r b _ —' `TT • FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NOT. r-`.', =.< -'j t` inM Under penalties of perjury I declare that I have read the foregoing and that t_he facts are ye„to rime' best of my latowledge and belief. ., _ p.� N General Partner(s) — • MiSM(5/45) MIAMI ONE CENTRE INC. BY: NED L. SIEGEL, PRESIDENT zot Pees: $7 per $1000, based on additional contnInidons Minimum $ 52,50. Mzdmum $I750.00 ' Submitted. into the public record in connection with item on 14t —14-/6o _ Walter Foeman City Clerk _ 00-1.1.37 Divislori of Corporations P.O. Box 6327 Tallahassee, Florida 32314 General Partnership THE RELATED GROUP OF FLORIDA 2828 CORAL WAY, PENTHOUSE SUITE MIAMI, FL 33145 Document Number FEI Number Date Filed GP9900000984 650372462 09/27/1999 State Total Pages Pages in Original Filing FL 0003 0003 Status Effective Date Expiration Date ACTIVE NONE NONE Current Partners Name History Cancellation Date 0002 NONE NONE No Filing History No Authority Infonmation No Name History Information Partners • n LJ Submitted into the public record, in connection with item I� on Walter Foeman City Clerk 00--1137 C • • ONE MIAMI MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT MINORITY CONSTRUCTION EMPLOYMENT PLAN Submitted into the public record,In connection with item on Walter Foeman City Clerk 0a-1131 is Ll The Related Grp of Florida 2828 Cora! Way, Penthouse Suite Miwxn, Florida 33145 Tel. (305) 460-9900, Fax (305) 460-9911 .J I. POLICY STATEMENT Our company policy is to provide equal employment opportunities to all applicants and employees without regard to race, color, religion, sex, age, national origin, handicapped condition or status as a disabled and/or Vietnam Era veteran and to affirmatively seek to advance the principles of equal employment opportunity. The company takes affirmative action to insure that applicants and employees are not discriminated against because of their status as handicapped persons. We affirm that the above policy and the Affirmative Action Program herewith reflect the company's attitude and its intention to: 1. Recruit, hire, train and promote for all job classifications without regard to handicapped condition. 2. Base decisions on employment as to further the principles of equal employment opportunity for qualified handicapped persons. 3. Insure that all other personnel actions such as compensation, promotions, benefits, transfers, terminations, Company -sponsored training, educational tuition assistance, social and recreational programs are administered without regard to handicapped condition. The company, in compliance with the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, maintains a written Affirmative Action Program. The Affirmative Action Program is made available to employees, upon request, in the Personnel Department during working hours. Overall responsibility for directing and implementing the policy enunciated herein and the Company's Affirmative Action Program for qualified handicapped persons has been assigned to Wanda Ponce, Personnel and Payroll Administrator, . 2828 Coral Way, Miami, Florida 33145, 305-460-9900, who serves as the company's Equal Employment Opportunity Coordinator. All personnel actions are analyzed to insure that this policy and the Affirmative Action Program are being properly implemented. The company is determined to be in full compliance with the provisions of the law and of the Affirmative Action Program. Submitted into the public record in connection with item on J -/_1 u_/.cu. Walter Foeman Q ®, _ 11 3 d City Clerk C ONE MIAMI MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS ARTICLE III. Supporting Documents Tab 1 Minority Construction Employment Plan Tab 2 Traffic Impact Analysis Tab 3 Site Utility Study Tab 4 Economic Impact Study Tab 5 Survey of Property Tab 6 Drawings Submitted Submitted into the Rubric recor in connection item /�- on .�2 , o Walter h Wal � � ` F��,. City CAI • ONE MIAMI MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT PROJECT DESCRIPTION ARTICLE II. Project Description A. Zoning Ordinance No. 11000 1. Section 1304.2.1 Application forms; supplementary materials 2. Section 1702.2.1 General Report 3. Section 1702.2.2 Major Use Special Permit Concept Plan 4. Section 1702.2.3 Development Impact Study Submitted into the public recor in connection item with i on Walter Foeman City Clerk 00-1137 Submitted into the plic ONE MIAMI AMENDMENT TO THE record in Connectio With MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT item on 1_2j v� Walter Foeman 1. Section 1304.1.1 Application Forms; Supplementary Materials.. City Clerk (a) Statements of ownership and control of the proposed development activity. The Disclosure of Ownership and Ownership Affidavit are provided in Article 1. (b) Statement describing in detail the direction and intended use of the development or activity. One Miami represents the first new commercial and residential development in downtown Miami, north of the Miami River, in many years. The project is being designed by the acclaimed architectural firm of Arquitectonica. One Miami will be a landmark project for the city and at its completion, it will become the Beacon for a revised downtown. New jobs and work opportunities will be created as a result of this project. And very importantly, the project will create an outstanding pedestrian and waterfront experience along the Bayfront in a pleasant and safe environment. The property is located at 205 South Biscayne Boulevard, Miami, Florida, also known as One Miami Parcel "A'. The project will be named "One Miami". It .will consist of a 34-story, 707,025 gross square foot office tower and a 49-story, 425 unit, 626,552 gross square foot multi -family residential tower with related amenities. The site is a 3.04 net acre parcel (4.89 gross acres) on the north side of the Miami River at the confluence with Biscayne Bay. The unique location makes this site one of Miami's most visible and impressive. The 34-story office tower is located at the West Side of the site, with a two- story lobby starting from Biscayne Boulevard and ending with a circular drop- off at the East Side, facing the water. The lobby will offer access to a restaurant as well as other ancillary retail stores. Floors .2 to 5 include the technical (MEP) and office service spaces and secured parking area. The typical office floor plan is abut 22,610 square feet and is served by two groups of elevators, one for the low-rise floor, and the other for the high-rise floors. The south elevation is designed as a smooth curve, reinforcing the water views. The building top (parapet wall) will conceal the cooling towers and elevator overruns. Both the base and top of the office tower form a parallelogram designed to provide a dynamic movement. The skin of the building is silver metallic combined with reflective blue-green glass and blue 1 metallic panels. The service areas, all located within the building, provides storage, receiving, loading and FPL transformer vaults and are located behind the lobby and in the ground floor parking area. The residential tower is located on the East Side of the property. The ground floor includes the lobby end auxiliary use (shop, food service) and technical service (mechanical, electrical, and plumbing) spaces. The building is . composed of an elongated 45-story volume and a tower of 49 stories at the east -end. There are 1 to 3 bedroom apartments of varying size. The lower 13 stories are connected with the adjacent parking garage structure. Valet parking will be available to tenants and patrons of the building. In order to maximize privacy, the building includes three cores of two rapid elevators each serving from two to four apartments. Every apartment offers a bay and/or river view. The majority of units have cross ventilation. Thestructure is concrete and masonry block, the exterior skin is stucco, painted in aqua colds (blues and greens). The east volume tower is designed to directionally express the development towards the water. The top deck of the parking garage includes garden, a fitness club with two tennis courts and an "infinity" type swimming pool. A lap pool, spa and party room are located on the ground floor. A public cafe will be located at the north east corner. A 20 foot wide baywalk pedestrian walkway along the entire 950 foot water side property line, for a total of 19,000 square feet will be used as a public area. The walkway will include landscaping, design pavers, sitting and viewing area. Tall palm trees, and other plantings, will punctuate the edge of the shoreline in order to soften the perception of the water's edge, and maintain a typical Miami atmosphere. The docking walkway proposed at the edge of the pedestrian walkway, at the lower level will further emphasize the marine character of the design. v �_ _?5 E The 12-story parking garage will include approximately 1,800 parking spaces CL o . ii and four 12 foot by 35 foot loading areas and two 12 foot by 55 foot loading U spaces. The primary entry for tenants and guests to the building will be O C CO through the two entries located on the vehicular street along the river. o c o Service access and express exit at rush hour will be via Biscayne Boulevard. -a Security control between office and residential parking occurs at every parking floor. The ground floor of the garage will be used exclusively for E o service and valet parking. � Vehicular access to One Miami from the north will be from Biscayne Boulevard, from the south from Brickell Avenue and from the west from the I-95 exit ramp. Valet and self -parking will be available on site. • Vehicular access for the project will be from Biscayne Boulevard through the vehicular street parallel to the Miami River. Circular drop-off for each tower 2 00-113I will facilitate traffic flow and access to the main lobby entrances. The parking garage is also accessed from this vehicular circulation: one 4-lane entry for upper levels and a second 2-lane entry for valet parking on ground floor. The service access for both towers will be off Biscayne Boulevard, on the north side of the property. One of the two lanes will be used as the parking garage's express exit during rush hour. One Miami will also be accessed by pedestrians from downtown Miami along the Bayfront walk and the Brickell Avenue area, as well as by boat from the Miami River or Biscayne Bay. The plaza surrounding the Property will create a pedestrian friendly urban environment and will become the core amenity for the project and natural extension of the Bayfront experience. Pedestrian traffic for the project is primarily accomplished by the wide pedestrian walkway along the Miami River and Biscayne Bay, which is separated from vehicular traffic, but connected with the buildings at several points. This pedestrian walkway will include a focal element and destination at the west end (Biscayne Boulevard) and also a destination and "view place" at the southeast corner. Secondary pedestrian traffic is also provided along the vehicular circulation on the buildings' side. The 13t' level of the parking garage building will serve as a recreation deck for the development and will include indoor and outdoor amenities. The indoor recreational facilities will include: exercise rooms, spa, Jacuzzi, lockers, bathrooms and showers. Exterior facilities will include a pool, two tennis courts, garden and sun deck. There will also be a cafe and bar, as well as a garden and trellis covered pergola. Thus, creating the atmosphere of a courtyard for the use of the office tenants and residents. Drawings showing the architectural character and location of the intended uses are included under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. pedestrian linkage and waterfront experience in a pleasant and safe environment. (c) General location map, showing relation of the site or activity for which special permit is sought to major streets, schools, existing utilities, shipping areas, important physical features in and adjoining the project or activity and the like. The following exhibits are included with the Major Use Special Permit Application: Submitted into the public record; �nconnection with Item -�, onr. 3 ®®" 1 1 3 7 Walter Foeman C ern ty (1) Aerial: Aerial photograph of the surrounding area indicating the project site. (2) Area Context Map/Site Aerial: Map of the project area indicating buildings and their functions that surround the site. (3) Location Map: Map of the surrounding street system indicating the project location. (d) A site plan containing the title of the project and the names of the project planner and developer, date, and north arrow and, based on an exact survey of the property drawn to a scale of sufficient size to show. The general information requested is shown on the Overall Plans Sheets Al.1 to A1.13 provided under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. The site plan includes the following: 1. Boundaries of the project, any existing streets, buildings, watercourses, easements and section lines. The boundaries of the project and the location of existing streets and easements are shown on the Survey located under Tab 5 of the Supporting Documents. 2. Exact location of all buildings and structures. The property is vacant and has no buildings as shown on the Boundary Survey under Tab 5. The location of the building to the constructed is shown on the Site Plan Al.1 and the Ground Floor Plan sheet A1.2 located under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. 3. Access and traffic flow and how vehicular traffic will be separated .from pedestrian and other types of traffic. Vehicular access to One Miami from the north will be from Biscayne Boulevard, from the south from Brickell Avenue and from the west from the I-95 exit -ramp. Valet and self parking will be available on site. Vehicular access for the project will be from Biscayne Boulevard through the vehicular street parallel to the Miami River. Circular drop-off for each tower will facilitate traffic flow and access to the main lobby entrances. The • parking garage is also accessed from this vehicular circulation: one 4-lane Submitted into the public record in connection with 0 0— 1 37 4 item on�1-�GL Walter Foeman City Clerk entry for upper levels and a second 2-lane entry for valet parking on ground floor. The service access for both towers will be off Biscayne Boulevard, on the north side of the property. One of the two lane's will be used as the parking garage's express exit during rush hour. One Miami will also be accessed by pedestrians from downtown Miami and the Brickell Avenue area, as well as by boat from the Miami River or Biscayne Bay. The plaza surrounding the Property will create a pedestrian friendly urban environment. Pedestrian traffic for the project is primarily accomplished by the wide pedestrian walkway along the Miami River and Biscayne Bay, which is separated from vehicular traffic but connected with the buildings at several points. This pedestrian walkway will include a "siting place" at the west end (Biscayne Boulevard) and a "view place" at the southeast corner. Secondary pedestrian traffic is also provided along the vehicular circulation on the buildings' side. A detailed anaylsis of the site access and traffic flow is provided in the Traffic Impact Analysis located under Tab 2 of the Supporting Document. 4. Off-street parking and off-street loading areas. The off street parking facility is located within the parking garage levels ground floor through 12`h floor. The parking structure will have 1,834 parking spaces, which will support the entire development. The garage is shown on Sheets Al. la to A1.6a provided under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. The Zoning Ordinance requires six loading bays, (4) 12' x 35' and (2) 12 x 55', all provided on the Ground/Floor Plan, Sheet A1.2, under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. 5. Recreational facilities locations. The 13'' level of the parking garage building will serve as a recreation deck for the development and will include indoor and outdoor amenities. The indoor recreational facilities will include: exercise rooms, spa, Jacuzzi, lockers, bathrooms and showers. Exterior facilities will include a pool, two tennis courts, garden and sun deck. There will also be a cafe and bar, as well as a garden and trellis covered pergola. Thus, creating the atmosphere of a courtyard for the use of the office tenants and residents. Submitted into the public record in connection with item] on ��++ r�' Walter Foeman 0 ®- a� City Clerk • These facilities are shown on the architectural Plan A1.7 and on the Landscape Plans under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. 6. Screens and buffers. Along Brickell Avenue and One Miami Street trees will create a soft edge to the project. Landscaped areas are indicated on the Architectural and Landscape Plans located under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. 7. Refuse collections areas. Waste collection will be provided by a containerized compactor system located within the service area in the building. In addition, the project will have a high rise recycling system for the residential units. These facilities are shown on the architectural Plan, Sheet A1.2 located under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. 8. Access to utilities and points of utilities hookups. Access and connections to site utilities are discussed in the. Site Utility Study located under Tab 3 of the Supporting Documents. (e) Tabulations of total gross acreage in the project and the percentages thereof proposed to be devoted to; 1. The various permitted uses. Building area 42.3% of gross lot area (footprint 90,495 S.F.) Open area, plazas, exterior courts and streets: 41,927 S.F. 31.6% of net lot area 2. Ground coverage by structures Ground coverage by the structures is 46% of the total gross lot area. (f) Tabulation showing the following: 1. The derivation of numbers of off-street parking and off-street loading spaces shown in (d) above. Submitted into the public record in c nnectfon with Item .won % 6 Wafter Foeman 0 Q_ 1 1 3 7 City Clerk • The landscape plans showing vegetation are found on the Landscape Plan P g P Sheets L1.1, L1.2, & L2. All landscape plans are located under tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (1) Plans for recreation facilities, if any, including location and general description of buildings for such use. The 13"' level of the parking garage will serve as a pool and recreational deck for the residential units and members for the Health Club. A garden area at the lobby level will provide a visual accent for the lobby. Exterior facilities will include a swimming pool, tennis court, garden and sun decks, with trellis and pavilion structure. On the 13"' level, a health spa will adjoin the pool deck and include a fitness center, spa, steam and sauna rooms, and Jacuzzi with access to the sun decks. The health spa and recreational facilities will be for use of residents and members. (m) Such additional data maps, plans, or statements as may be required for the particular use or activity involved. The details of the spaces and calculations used to compute the Floor Area Ratio (FAR) are shown on the Al.1 Plan provided under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (n) Such additional data as the applicant may believe is pertinent to the proper consideration of the site and development plan. Sections and elevations depicting the architectural character of the building are shown on the Architectural Drawings. Sheets A1.10, A1.11, A1.12 through A2.9, A3.12, A3.13, A3.14. All elevations and sections are located under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. 2. Section 1702.2.1 General Report. (a) Property ownership and beneficial interest within the boundaries of the area proposed for Major Use Special Permit. Statement of Ownership and beneficial interest within the boundaries of the area proposed for Major Use Special Permit are provided in Article 1. (b) The nature of the unified interest or control. Submitted into the public record in connection with The nature of unified interest or control is indicated ipaMj icl Walter Foeman City Clerk s 00-1137 • (c) - Survey of the proposed area showing property lines and ownership. A copy of the Survey is included under Tab 5 of the Supporting Documents. (d) Map of existing features, including streets, alleys, easements, utilities lines, existing land use, general topography, and physical features. The existing site features and utility lines are shown on the Boundary Survey of the property located under Tab 5. The site features and the utilities are also described in the Site Utility Study, located under a Tab 3 of the Supporting Documents. (e) Materials to demonstrate the relationship of the elements listed in (4) preceding to surrounding area characteristics. The Drawings submitted with this Application are located under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (f) Existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan designations for the • area on and around the lands proposed for Major Use Special Permit. The zoning designation for the property pursuant to City of Miami Ordinance No. 11000 and Page 36 of the Zoning Atlas Map which is located in Article I, indicates the existing and surrounding zoning designations. The zoning designation for the Property is CBD, Central Business District. The comprehensive plan future land use designation for the Property is Commercial Business District. The zoning and the comprehensive plan designations are consistent with one another. 3. Section 1702.2.2 Major Use Special Permit Concept Plan. (a) Relationships of the concept plan to surrounding existing and proposed future uses, activities, systems, and facilities (transportation, recreation, view corridors, pedestrian systems, service systems and similar uses). Article II contains a written narrative of this project outlining proposed uses and activities. This narrative also contains descriptions of the project's relationship to traffic, pedestrian movements, and transportation access. The list of drawings submitted is found under Tab 6 of the . Supporting Documents. Submitted into the record in public item -nnection b on !i Walter Foeman 9 --gg City Clerk • (b) Existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan principles and designations. This project conforms with the CBD, Central Business District zoning district designation for the Property. The comprehensive plan future land use designation conforms with the land use designation currently in effect for the Property. 4. Section 1702.2.3 Development Impact Study. (a) A traffic analysis shall be submitted for an area within approximately 1/4 mile of the site, or an area including the major intersections to be impacted by the site, whichever is larger. The Traffic Impact analysis is included under Tab 2 of the Supporting Documents. (b) Economic Impact data shall be provided, including estimates for construction costs, construction employment, and permanent employment and shall demonstrate that the proposed development is favorable to the economy, public services, environment and housing supply of the City. The Economic Impact Study is included under Tab 4 of the Supporting Documents. (c) A housing Impact assessment. There will be 425 residential units within the development. The units will be affordable to middle and upper income individuals. (d) A description of proposed energy conservation measures shall be provided, including only those measures that are proposed in addition to the minimum requirements in State Energy Code. Architecturally, the office building envelope will be comprised of reflected tinted glass, metal panels and the roof. The residential building envelope will be masonry walls with stucco and tinted glass. All exterior and landscape lighting will be controlled by means of time clocks and photocell switches. Energy saving lamps, ballasts and fixtures are being considered at cores and public spaces. (e) Historic Buildings Submitted into the public record in connection with There are no historic structures located on the Propertyy on Walter Foeman City Clerk io 0®-1137 0 (f) Environmental Zone Is The Property is not located within an environmental preservation district. The Property is located within the Archaeological Conservation Area. Submitted into the public recor in connection with item on -12—h—qA Walter Foeman City Clerk, 11 00-1137 � ONEMIAMI_ � • July 25, 2000 Adrienne Pardo, Esq. Greenberg Traurig, A.A. 1,221 Brickell Avenue Miami, FL 33131 RE: SUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENT TO MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT FOR PARCEL A Dear Adrienne: This letter serves to advise you that Greenberg, Traurig has the authority to file a Substantial Amendment to the Major Use Special Permit approved pursuant to Resolution No. 98-1151 and a Miami -Dade County Shoreline Application on behalf. of The Related Group of Florida for Parcel A of One Miami, It is my understanding that The Related Group will be paying for all application fees, as well as for all legal fees earned by Greenberg Traurig, and that One Miami Centre Limited 'Partnership will not be responsible for any costs or fees to Greenberg Traurig for the substantial amendment for Parcel A or the Shoreline Application. Very truly yours, Miami One CAntre, L.P. By: Mi I One (fen , Inc., its general partner By: _ Ned L. Siegel SubMitted into the ublic President record in connect'�n� with NLS/laf t$em { on U Walter Foeman City Clerk 5000 Blue Lake Drive, Suite 150 • Boca Raton, FL 33431. Plione:.561/998.9200 • Fax: 561/998.7882 QO-1137 0 ONE MIAMI PROJECT DIRECTORY Applicant The Related Group of Florida Jorge Perez, President 2828 Coral Way, PH 1 Phone: (305) 460-9900 Miami, Florida 33145 Fax: (305) 445-1834 Email: amarilys@related.usa.com Asst.: Alicia Ruffin Tony Albanese Senior Vice President Phone: (305) 460-9900 Fax: (305) 445-1834 Cell: (305-793-3846 Architect Arquitectonica Bernardo Fort -Brescia 550 Brickell Avenue Louis B. St. Clair Suite 200 Phone: (305) 372-1812 Miami, Florida 33131 Fax: (305) 372-1175 is Email: Ist.clair@arqiniami.com Landscape Architect Curtis Rogers Design Studio Inc. Richard H. Rogers 2982 Grand Avenue, Suite 301 Phone: (305) 442-1774 Coconut Grove, Florida 33133 Fax: (305) 445-9488 Email: currog@bellsouth.net �M Consul -Tech Engineering, Inc. Marco A. Osorio, P.E. 10570 N.W. 27`h Street Phone: (305) 599-3141 Suite 101 Fax: (305) 599-3143 Miami, Florida 33172 Email: mosorio@cte.cc Donnell, Duquesne & Albaisa, P.A. Ramon Donnell, P.E. 4930 S.W. 74`' Court Phone: (305) 666-0711 Miami, Florida 33155 Fax: (305) 666-5259 Submitted into the public record in connection with item _41_� on 6Z1_&7_/_ Walter Foeman City Clerk 00-1137 • Traffic Page 2 David Plummer & Associates David Plummer, President 1750 Ponce de Leon Blvd. Phone: 305/447-0900 Coral Gables, FL 33134 Fax: 305/444-4986 Email: david.plununer@dphunmer.com Asst.: Susan Killmeyer Marine/Environmental Coastal Systems International, Inc. Christy Brush 464 S. Dixie Highway Phone: (305) 661-3655 Coral Gables, FL 33146 Phone: (305) 661-1914 . Email: Cbrush@CoastalSystemslnt.com Economic z' Sharpton, Brunson & Company Darryl Sharpton One SE Third Avenue Phone: (305) 374-1574 Suite 2100 Fax: (305) 372-8161, Miami, Florida 33131 Email: dks@sbccpa.com Legal Greenberg Traurig, P.A. 1221 Brickell Avenue Mianu, FL 33131 Lucia A. Dougherty, Esq. Phone: (305) 579-0603 Fax: (305) 961-5603 Email: doughertyl@gtlaw.com Asst.: Brenda Chisholm , Adrienne Friesner Pardo, Esq. Phone: (305) 579-0683 Fax: (305) 961-5683 Email: pardoa@gtlaw.com Asst.: Marisol Gonzalez the public Submitted into wi'th record in Conn on on f V4alter Foeman item" Clerk City MIAMI/PARDOA/976191/kx8t'01 LDOC/8/31/00 00-1131 0- Florida Limited Partnership MIAMI ONE CENTRE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP PRINCIPAL ADDRESS 5000 BLUE LAKE DRIVE, SUITE 150 BOCA RATON FL 33431 MAILING ADDRESS 5000 BLUE LAKE DRIVE, SUITE 150 BOCA RATON FL 33431 Document Number FEI Number Date Filed A98000002180 650864669 09/17/1998 State Status Effective Date FL ACTIVE NONE Last Event Event Date Filed Event Effective Date - CONTRIBUTION CHANGE 04/27/1999 NONE Actual Contribution 4,000,000.00 public on with Foeman ,ity Clerk 00-1137 MIAMI ONE CENTRE LIMITED PART E NERSIIIP Document Number Date Filed A98000002180 09/17/1999 EVENT TYPE FILED EFFECTIVE DATE, DATE ONTRIBUTION HANGE • • 04/27/1999 Submitted into the public record n c nnection with item on -UPq.,L Walter Foeman City Clerk. 00-113,7 :1 OneMami., MUSP Traffic, 1.rnpact'Study Prepared by: David Plummer & Associates, Inc. 0 Prepared for: The Related Group of Florida September, 2000(R) #00124 Submitted into the public record in connection with item on Walter Foernan City Clerk Otte Miami AIUSP Traffic Impact Stuffy TABLE OF:CONTENTS Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................. ................... iii :1.0 INTRODUCTION.............:..................................... 1 1.1 Study Area ............ .... ........................... 1 1.2 Study Objective ................................................. 1 2.0 EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS ..... ............................. 3 2.1 Data Collection ............................................... 3 2.1.1 Roadway Characteristics ............................... . 3 2.1.2 Intersection Volumes ..................................... 5 2.1.3 Intersection Data ........................................ 5 . 2.2 Roadway Capacity Analysis ..................................... 8 .2.3 Intersection Capacity Analysis ... ..... ..................... 9 3.0 PLANNED AND PROGRAMMED ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS ............ 10 4.0 FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS ..................................... 11 4.1 Background Traffic ........... ........................ .... 11 4.2 . Committed Developments ....................................... 11 4.3 Project Traffic ................. ........................... 15 4.3.1 Project Trip Generation .... .. ........................ 15 4.3.2 Project Trip Assignment .............. I. ................... 15 4.4 Future Traffic Conditions with Project ............................. 18 5.0 CONCLUSIONS .................................................. 21 Appendix A: Attachment D1: Trip Generation Rates for Downtown DRI Appendix B: Intersection Capacity Analysis Worksheets Submitted into the pubtic record in connection with Walter Foeman City Clerk Pager QO- 113? One Miami MUSP Traffic /m act Stndi, LIST OF EXHIBITS Exhibit Page 1 Location Map.. ....... ....................... 2 2 2000 PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes . ...................... ....... 6 3 Existing Lane Configurations ............................................. 7 4 Existing (2000) Road way'Capacity Analysis ............. ........... ... 8 5 Existing (2000) Intersection Capacity Analysis Results ...................... 9 6 Committed Developments PM Peak Hour Trip Generation ................. 12 .7 Committed Developments Cardinal Distribution (2005 Stage) ................ 13 8 Future PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes without Project ...................... 14 9 Project Trip Generation - PM Peak Hour .... ...... ......... ..... • • .. 15 10 Project Cardinal Distribution (2005 Stage) ................................. 16 11 Project Traffic Assignment ...........::.............................. 17 12 Future PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes with. Project ........................ 19 13 Future Intersection Capacity Analysis Results with Project .................. 18 14 Future Roadway Capacity Analysis with Project ........................... 20 Submitted into the pubic record in connection with Walter Foeman City Clerk 'Page ii The One Miami project is a proposed mixed use development located in Downtown Miami, Florida. The proposed project would occupy four parcels of land adjacent to the DuPont Plaza Hotel in Downtown Miami. This study is for Parcel A, the first increment of'the One Miami Project. The proposed development consists of 707,025 square feet of gross floor area (SF GFA) of office which includes ancillary retail, 425 residential dwelling units, and an 1834 vehicle parking garage. Access to the project garage is proposed through a main driveway at Biscayne Boulevard Way/SE 4 Street and a secondary driveway for egress during the afternoon peak hours only, at approximately midblock south of SE 3 Street. Buildout for the proposed One Miami is anticipated by the year 2003. The trips generated by the proposed development were estimated using the trip generation rates established by the Downtown Miami Development of Regional Impact (DRI). It was estimated that the proposed One Miami would generate approximately 480 motor vehicles per hour during the PM peak period. The Downtown DRI trip generation rates already account for travel by other modes of transportation. A list of committed developments in the area was identified. In the early 1980's, the City of Miami prepared an areawide Application for. Development Approval (ADA) that gives the City jurisdiction over the approval of any development within the downtown area., The document is .referred to as the Downtown Miami Areawide DRI or Downtown Miami DRI. The intent of this process was to measure the regional impacts from estimated growth in this area. The Development Order (DO) issued allowed the City to approve both local and regional size projects as long as the proposed development conformed with the mitigation requirements adopted in the DO. The MUSP Traffic Impact Study for One Miami was performed in accordance with the requirements of the Downtown Miami DRI. Analysis of future (2003) traffic conditions with the project during PM peak hour shows that the Downtown Miami DRrsa,�opted Level of Service E standard will not be exceeded bl.*UM11--d into the pubtic item •••••vvuv�� Vrru1 on tr- Walter Foeman , City Clerk N Q®-'111 ? One Miami MUSP Traffic Impact Stud)' with the lane reconfiguration and signal timing adjustments at . SE 2 Street/SE 2 Avenue in addition.:to signal timing adjustments at the --intersections of SE 2 Street/Biscayne Boulevard, SE 3 Street/SE 2 Avenue; and SE 4 Street/SE 2 Avenue. Adequate capacity during the PM peak hour is available -to accommodate the proposed project trips within the�study area.at the remaining intersections and on the roadway segments. The proposed -One Miami project will comply with the requirements of the Downtown Mianii DRI and pay Proportional. ShareFees'which may used by the city for transportation improvements in the area. Submitted into the public _ on r� ;� item Walter Foeman . City Clerk _ r 00 One Miami MUSP Traffic Impact Study — 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 STUDY AREA Consistent with the Downtown DPI, the traffic study has been performed for PM peak hour conditions. For .: traffic analysis purposes, the study area has been defined as SE 2 Street to the north, SE 4 Street to 'the south, SE 2 Avenue to the west, and Biscayne Bay to the east (see Exl ibit:l Location Map). Roadway link capacity analysis was performed'for the regionally significant roadways, including segments.along SE 2 Avenue, SE 2 Street, and SE 3 Street. Intersection capacity analysis was performed for the following intersections: • SE 2 Street / Biscayne Boulevard _ • SE 2 Street /SE 3 Avenue • . SE 2 Street /SE 2 Avenue I-95 Ramps / SE 3 Street /SE 2 Avenue • SE 3 Street /SE 3 Avenue • SE 3 Street / Biscayne Boulevard • SE 4 Street /SE 2 Avenue • SE 4 Street /SE 3 Avenue 1.2 STUDY OBJECTIVE Approvals for Parcel A, increment one of the One Miami project, are sought under the DO issued to the Downtown Mianzi DRI. The objective of this traffic study is to assess possible localized PM peak hour impacts as a result of this project. Q a 9 TER N W 2 F- " 16 ST JACKSON 19 EMORIA > Q e HOSPITAL W i T > � 3 � B/SCAYNE !BEANO errArvvR— o 15 ST 3 a NE15ST N 4 T SR 133 13 T - WATSON N 1 T ISLAND Jr N 1 b NW6ST 6ST W5ST 5 ST 4 ST 3 ST 1- N 4 ST `0 2 ST w w ' 3 ST 2 ST N 1 ER S7 1 ST S W 1 ST 2 .. U, T E ONE MIAMI o > O LL L• . ss U L, m 3 r BRICKELLcz SW7Sr KEY c c o S W 8 ST V^ ) � 9 ST Cil C a 0 S 10 T' 11 ST 11 Sr _ UO E 12 ST S W 13 ST Sr U) LEGEND . 13 ST 9 'PQ � r STUDYAREA EXHIBIT ONE MIAMI LOCATION MAP 1 � ��WII MUSP TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY a 0 Page 2- One Mianu MUSP Traffic Impact Stui v 2.0 .EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS 2.1 DATA COLLECTION Data collection for this study included roadway characteristics; intersection data, intersection volumes, and signal timing. The data collection effort is described in detail in the following sections. 2.1.1 .Roadway Characteristics Brickell Avenue Brickell Avenue is one of the major arterials in Downtown Miami and connects the Central Business District (CBD) and the Brickell Area. It is a 6-lane, divided roadway with a raised median. Brickell Avenue in the immediate vicinity to the project site (south of SE 4 Street over the Miami River) operates as a two- way, 5-lane (2-northbound lanes and 3-southbound lanes), divided roadway. The bridge is 6 lanes wide but the northbound lanes narrow to 2 lanes due to right-of-way constraints. The roadway then widens to a 6-lane divided section with a landscaped median south of the Miami River. The extension of Brickell Avenue north of SE 4 Street is SE 2 Avenue. Northbound traffic on Brickell Avenue must turn right onto eastbound SE 4 Street, which extends east to become Biscayne Boulevard Way. The posted speed limit is 30 miles per hour (mph). On -street parking'is not permitted along Brickell Avenue within the study limits. Biscayne Boulevard Biscayne Boulevard is also a major arterial in Downtown Miami. It is a two-way, divided- arterial. The number of lanes varies from 6 to 8 within the downtown area. Biscayne Boulevard between SE 2 Street and NE 5 Street has a wide median, which operates as a municipal parking lot by the Miami Parking System. It provides the CBD area with connectivity to I-395 and Miami Beach. On -street metered parking is permitted on limited portions of the Biscayne Boulevard southbound approach. The elevated Metromover runs along the Biscayne Boulevard median between SE 2 Street and NE 1 Street. The Metromover's Bayfront Park Station is located on Biscayne Boulevard in the vicinity of SE 2 Street. Biscayne Boulevard becomes a one-way northbound roadway in the immediate vicinity of the project site (between SE 4 Street and SE 2 Street). The posted speed limit within8kOWZmdrM4 lg6"4blic record in connection with Walter Foeman Page 3 City Clerk QO-1113`7 One Miami MUSP Traffic Impact Study SEINE 2 Avenue ,. SEINE 2 Avenue is a 3-lane, one-way southbound roadway that provides Downtown Miami with access to the interstate highways I-395 and I-95. The number of lanes in the immediate vicinity of the study area vanes from 3 (north of SE 2 Street). to 5 lanes (between SE 3 Street and SE 4. Street). SE 2 Avenue provides access to the I-95 ramps via SE 3 Street. SE,2 Avenue extends south of SE.4.Street to become Brickell Avenue. On -street parking is not.permitted on either side of SE 2 Avenue. The posted speed limit is 30 mph. - SEINE 3 Avenue SE 3 Avenue is a 3-lane, one-way northbound arterial between SE 4 Street. to the south and Flagler Street to the north. It becomes NE 3`Avenue north :of Flagler. Street and=terminates at: NE 2Street. -On-street parking is permitted on certain portions of SE'3 Avenue. The posted speed limit is 30. mph SE 2 Street SE 2 Street is a westbound one-way street. It starts as a 5,-lane section between Biscayne Boulevard and SE 3 Avenue, and narrows to 2 lanes west of SE 2 Avenue, A substantial percentage of SE 2 Avenue Vf�c is destined for I-95 via SE 2 Avenue and SE 3 Street. The posted speed limit is 30 mph. On-street-pgl a E U CL is not permitted along SE 2 Street within the study limits. o ` r U c o SE 3 Street CA SE 3 Street west of SE 2 Avenue is a two-way, 4-lane, divided roadway with a posted speed limo a mph. SE 3 Street provides Airect access (on-ramp/off-ramp) to I-95. The Miami Metromover is 9cge j centerline of SE 3 Street between SE 2 Avenue and Biscayne Boulevard. SE 3 Street is a 2-lane, one-baap eastbound roadway east of SE 2 Avenue and is divided by the Metromover's elevated rail structure. On - street parking is not permitted on either side of the roadway. SE 4 Street/Biscayne Boulevard Wad M SE 4 Street is a 4-lane, one-way eastbound roadway between SE 2 Avenue and SE 3 Avenue., It extends r"{ east to become Biscayne Boulevard Way between SE 3 Avenue and Biscayne Boulevard. Biscayne Boulevard Way is a 2-lane, one-way eastbound roadway. SE 4 Street/Biscayne Boulevard Way is the main Pare 4. One Miami MUSP Traffic lmpact�Studv — SE/NE 2 Avenue SE/NE 2 Avenue is a 3-lane, one-way southbound roadway that provides Downtown Miami with access to the interstate highways I-395 and I-95. The number of lanes in the immediate vicinity of the study area varies from 3 (north of SE 2 Street) to 5 lanes (between SE 3 Street and SE 4 Street). SE 2 Avenue provides access to the I-95 ramps via SE 3 Street. SE 2 Avenue extends south of SE 4 Street to become Brickell Avenue. On -street parking is not permitted on either side of SE 2 Avenue. The posted speed limit is 30 mph. SE/NE 3 Avenue SE 3 Avenue is a 3-lane, one-way northbound arterial between SE 4 Street to the south and Flagler Street to the north. It becomes NE 3 Avenue north of Flagler Street and terminates at NE 2 Street. On -street parking is permitted on certain portions of SE 3 Avenue. The posted speed limit is 30 mph. SE 2 Street SE 2 Street is a westbound one-way street. It starts as a 5-lane section between Biscayne Boulevard and SE 3 Avenue, and narrows to 2 lanes west of SE 2 Avenue. A substantial percentage of SE 2 Avenue traffic is destined for I-95 via SE 2 Avenue and SE 3 Street. The posted speed limit is 30 mph. On -street parking is not permitted along SE 2 Street within the study limits. SE 3 Street SE 3 Street west of SE 2 Avenue is a two-way, 4-lane, divided roadway with a posted speed limit of 30 mph. SE 3 Street provides direct access (on-ramp/offramp) to I-95. The Miami Metromover is located centerline of SE 3 Street between SE 2 Avenue and Biscayne Boulevard. SE 3 Street is a 2-lane, one-way eastbound roadway east of SE 2 Avenue and is divided by the Metromover's elevated rail structure. On - street parking is not permitted on either side of the roadway. SE 4 Street/Biscayne Boulevard Way SE 4 Street is a 4-lane, one-way eastbound roadway between SE 2 Avenue and SE 3 Avenue. It extends east to become Biscayne Boulevard Way between SE 3 Avenue and Biscayne Boulevard. Biscayne Boulevard Way is a 2-lane, one-way eastbound oagw" ye9E'R�tTtg#B&q"e Boulevard Way is the main recor� in connection with item 12L6:: on _Lzdrci,l� Walter Foeman 4 City clerk 0 0_ 1-11 3 7 One Miami MUSP TrajTc Impact Study access for Brickell Avenue traffic heading north into. the CBD :area.via Biscayne Boulevard. On -street metered parking is permitted on both sides of Biscayne Boulevard Way. The posted speed limit is 30 mph. 2.1.2 Intersection Volumes Consistent with the Downtown Miami DRI traffic study,, peak hour vehicle turning movement counts were collected at the intersections under study. Seasonal, adjustment factors were obtained from the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT). Exhibit 2 shows the 2000 PM peak hour traffic volumes at the intersections under study. 2.1.3 Intersection Data A field survey was conducted to determine the lane configurations for the roadways and intersections under study. Existing signal timing data was obtained from Miami -Dade County for the intersections to be analyzed. This information provided the signal phasing and timing used in the intersection capacity analysis. Exhibit 3 shows the existing lane configurations for all intersections and .roadways studied. Submiled into the public record in connection with Walter Foernan Page S City Clerk 0 0 - I 190 r� i I i D ; S.E. 3 ST I i I I I i• I I I ----------------------- Q M :, ❑D 1,963 ID � M j FIRST UNION I BUILDING j l -------------------------------- � 0 0 4❑ ha❑CD --------------------------- i I� � I } r I pi n CIL^ � I I lr B ca W of I I Z I �I I vl �ZT �, SE 4 ST BISC. BLVD. WAY U. m1 o^� — — — — — — ...• — �; 1.004 ; d� D ,y -- — — — — — — — -- -------------- --------- — — 3 I I I N >I Q � — N I ui ; I DUPONT PLAZA HOTEL vi I �I j I i 'MIAMI RIVER DAV I D PLUWER & ASSOC I ATES, I NC, P® TRANSPORTATION • CIVIL • STRUCTURAL • ENVIRORWNTAL ONE MIAMI coRAL cAeLEs ronrN nRS� AST PALM REACH MUSP TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY �..�. a ..a.... �a ..�. , . , BAYFRONT PARK CM 0 50, 100, M 4 ❑D 41 % v �/1 CHOAZA PIN PLAZA ------------------ NTERCONTIN NTAL OFFICE INTERCONTINENTAL HOTEL BISCAYNE BAY LEGEND A- ONE MIAMI PROJECT PARCEL DESIGNATION 250-- HOURLY VOLUME d❑ -SIGNAL v 2000 PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES E. 2 DAVID PLUMMER •8 ASSOCIATES, INC. P® TRANSPORTATION • CIVIL STRUCTURAL fNVIRONAENTAL ONE MIAMI oRgL":Lws ;a;T�Y*rtRsa, •s* P;L�ecwC,T,,, MUSP TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY BAYFRONT PARK, ) I 0 50, 100, ti ---------------------- / — --- --- — - — — CHOPIN PLAZA rERCONTINEENTAL OFFICE INTERCONTINENTAL HOTEL BISCAYNE BAY LEGEND A- ONE MIAMI PROJECT PARCEL DESIGNATION -TRAFFIC LANE DESIGNATION <0 - SIGNAL v �rt�roo •. oorr EXISTING LANE CONFIGURATION 3 One Miami MUSP Traffic fn act Studv 2.2 ROADWAY CAPACITY ANALYSIS Roadway capacity is the maximum number of vehicles that can pass through a given point during a specific time period under prevailing roadway and traffic control`device conditions. The Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) defines six levels of service (LOS); with LOS `A representing the best operating conditions, and LOS " F representing the worst. The Downtown Miami DR[ has adopted minimum LOS ` E " for the study area. In accordance with the_Downtown Miami DR[, the analysis of existing traffic conditions was performed -for Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) for PM peak hour -conditions. For this analysis, service volumes were obtained from the generalized service volume tables.published in FDOT's 1998 Florida's Level of Service Standards and Guidelines Manual for Planning. The summary of existing levels of service for roadway segments in the study area is shown in Exhibit 4. Exhibit 4 Existing (2000) Roadway Capacity Analysis Weekday PM Peak Hour Conditions Peak Direction Roadway Limits Direction Number. of Volume Service LOS Lanes Volume (LOS E) Biscayne North of NB 4LD 1,309 3,140 C Boulevard SE 2 Street SB : 4LD 1,3.63 C Brickell South of. NB 2LD 1,286 2,560 C Avenue SE 4'Street SB 3LD 1,571 C SE 2 Avenue just north of 2 Street SB 31, One-way 718 3,170 C SE 2 Street just west of SE 2 Ave WB 2L One-way 490 2,100 C SE 3 Street just west of SE 2.Ave EB 2LD 904. 1,750 '. C WB 2LD 1,539: D Source: Generalized Peak Hour Peak Directional Volumes, FDOT's 1998 LUS Manual. Submitted into the public record in connection with item 1271e on _t-2,1 tf-l. — Walter Foernan City Clerk Page 8 d®-1 r? One Mianu MUSP Traffic Impact Study 2.3 INTERSECTION: CAPACITY ANALYSIS The intersection capacity analysis was performed using Highway Capacity Software (HCS), based on procedures of the 1997 Highway Capacity Manual. Exhibit 5 shows the resulting LOS for existing conditions at the intersections under study (see. Appendix B for analysis worksheets). All except for three of the intersections operate above capacity for the existing lane configuration with the existing signal phasing and timing plan. The intersections of SE 2 Street/Biscayne Boulevard, SE 2 Street/SE 2 Avenue and the I-95 ramp/SE 3 Street/SE 2 Avenue operate under the acceptable LOS. Exhibit 5 Existing (2000) Intersection CapacityAnalysis Results Weekday PM Peak Hour Conditions Intersection Existing LOS 1. Biscayne Boulevard / Chopin Plaza B 2. SE 2 Street / Biscayne Boulevard B 3. SE 2 Street /SE 2 Avenue F 4. SE 2 Street /SE 3 Avenue D . 5. I-95 Ramps / SE 3 Street /SE 2 Avenue F 6. SE 3 Street /SE 3 Avenue C 7. SE 3 Street / Biscayne Boulevard B 8. SE 4 Street /SE 2 Avenue F 9. SE 4 Street /SE 3 Avenue A 10. Biscayne Boulevard/Main Driveway. N/A. 11. Biscayne Boulevard/Express Driveway N/A Source: DPA Submi`ted into the public record in connection with item on Walter Foeman ��pp Pave 9 City Clerk 0 0 —11 3 7 One Miami MUSP Traffic Impact Studp 3.`0 �PLAN'NED AND:PROGRAMMED ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS The 2000 Miami -Dade County Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), the 2015 Metro -Dade Trans-,2ortaiion Plan Long Range. Element, as well as projects identified by the Miami Downtown Development Authority (DDA), were. reviewed to identify any programmed or planned projects within the limits of the study area established for this study. !These- documents show no officially programmed or planned improvements within the study area although, there are planned roadway and transit improvements in the surrounding area. Also, the DDA and other groups downtown have formulated several unfunded transportation improvement proposals for the downtown core and the extended downtown to the north and south. Submitted into the public record in connection with item on ta Walter Foernan City Clerk Page / 0 One Aliand AMSP Traffic Impact Sfud), 4.0 FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS 4.1 BACKGROUND TRAFFIC Consistent with other traffic studies performed in this area, a 1% growth factor was added to existing traffic volumes. This growth rate is intended to account for future growth due to additional developments which have not been identified at this time and may occur within the study period. 4.2 COMMITTED DEVELOPMENTS The Miami Downtown Development Authority (DDA) has identified proposed and committed developments in the downtown area. These projects were listed in several issues of the DDA newsletter: City News - Miami. The projects in the vicinity of One Miami are listed in Exhibit b along with the project size and trip generation for the PM peak hour. Traffic generated by these developments was distributed using the Cardinal Distributions obtained from the Metro -Dade Transportation Plan: Long Range Element to the Year 2015. The appropriate cardinal distribution for these developments, along with the corresponding Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZ) are shown in Exhibit 7. Submitted into the public record in connection with item .2L<- on _ / L I tea N/ r Foeman Page I l City Clerk 0 0- 11 d r? One ,khami MUSP Traffic Impact Study Exhibit 6 Committed Developments PM Peak Hour Trip Generation Project PM Peak Hour Vehicle Trips . Name & TAZ Location Land Use Designation Number Address of Units In Out Total The Yacht 667 1111 S High Rise Apt/Condo 355 DUS 29 19 48 Club at Bayshore Dr Office 8,500 SF 1 4 5 Brickell Quality Restaurant(Z) 4,000 SF - - - 30 23 53 JW 667 1111 Marriott Brickell Hotel 302 Rooms 24 37 61 Hotel Avenue Brickell 667 W of S High Rise Condo 639 DUs Bay Plaza Bayshore Dr Quality Restaurant(') 7,452 SF 52 35 87 between 12 Retail 5,149 SF St and 12 Terr Bayshore 667 E of S High Rise Apt/Condo 749 DUs Palms Bayshore Dr Quality Restaurant(') 7,357 SF 61 41 102 between 14 Retail (2) 9,500 SF St and 12 St One 668 Tequesta Brickell Key High Rise Apt/Condo 288 DUs 24: 16 39 Point Two 668 Tequesta Brickell Key High Rise Apt/Condo 268 DUs 22 15 37 Point Three 668 Tequesta Brickell Key High Rise Apt/Condo' 234 DUs 19 13 32 Point Mandarin 668 Hotel Brickell Key Hotel 329 Rooms 27 40 66 Courvoiser 668 Courts Brickell Key High Rise Apt/Condo 272 DUs 22 15 37 Brickell on Hotel 325 Rooms 26 39 66 the River 615 27 SE 5 St High Rise Apt/Condo 614 DUs 50 33 84 Office 17,426 SF 2 9 11 78 81 160 Notes: Source: Independent Traffic Study, (2) Ancillary retail, trips not generated separately. Submitted into the publiC record in connection with item 2L6--- on ar- x1 Walter Foeman. Page 12 City Clerk One Miami MUSP Traffic Impact Study Exhibit 7 -Cardinal Distribution (2005 Stage) TAZs 667, 668 & 675 Cardinal Direction Distribution TAZ 667 Distribution TAZ 668 Distribution TAZ 675 NNE 12.25% 5.59% . 15.02% . ENE 4.56% 4.78% 5.82% ESE 0:79% 0.19% 1:80% SSE 104% 0.89% 4.15% SSW :10.936/, 8.50% 8.56% WSW 24.88% 24.13% 23.42% WNW 20.37% ' 25.99% 18.08% NNW 25.18% 29.93% 23.15% Total 100% 100% 100% Source: Metro -Dade Long Range Transportation Plan Update. The Cardinal Distribution gives a generalized distribution of trips from a TAZ to other parts of Miami -Dade County. For estimating trip distribution for committed projects, consideration was given to conditions such as the roadway network accessed by the project, roadways available to travel in the desired direction, and attractiveness of traveling on a specific roadway. Future traffic volumes were projected for the buildout year 2003. Future (2003) projected turning movement volumes and roadway link volumes without the project are shown in Exhibit 8. Submitted into the public record in connection with item a6-- on UL Walter Foeman Page 13 City Cleric Q O _ 113 7 p 2.058 - d - - - - - - - I Q M tD j FIRST I Ln i M UNION I SE3ST I I BUILDING .j 4p <10 - r I a �m Lh I I z l o i LLi i i Q, _N CD SE 4 ST I BISC. BLVD. WAY cnI m J I . 1 d❑17 �� - - 36 N - --------- %82 v, I N DUPONT PLAZA HOTEL �__'MIAMI RIVER BAYFRONT PARK - 0 .50' 100, ti ❑D 42 -- ------------- ----- ---------- r CHOPIN PLAZA - - - NTERCONTIN NTAL OFFICE INTERCONTINENTAL HOTEL a DAVID PLUMMER 8 ASSOCIATES, INC. NQJCCI. ❑ILE. P® TRANSPORTATION • CIVII STRUCTURAL ENVIRONAENTAL ONE MIAMI I CORAL GILg5 ur Irn FMI MYERS� �" r NEST PALM EACH MU TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY ..�. v , I., w .. .... . BISCAYNE BAY - LEGEND A- ONE MIAMI PROJECT PARCEL . DESIGNATION 250- -HOURLY VOLUME dp -SIGNAL v FUTURE PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES WITHOUT PROJECT. 8 One Miami MUSP'Traffic Impact Study 4.3 PROJECT TRAFFIC 4.11 Project'Trip' Generation Trip genezation' for the project was estimated using the rates published in Attachment D-2: Downtown Miami, DRI Facilities Trip Generation Analysis in the Notification of Proposed Change (NOPC) to the Downtown Miami DRI, Submitted to the'South Florida Regional Planning Council on September,1994 (see Appendix A). The vehicular directional split (iri/out) was estimated based on the percentages published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Trip Generation, Sixth Edition, for similar land uses. A trip generation summary for the project for a weekday PM peak hour is provided in Exhibit 9. Exhibit 9 Project Trip Generation (tI PM Peak Hour Land Use Designation Number of Units Rate per Unit PM Peak Hour Vehicle Trips LZI In Out Total High Rise Apt/Condo 425 DUs 0.1360563 35 23 58 Office(3) 707,025 SF 0.000598.5 72 351 423 Total 107 374 481 (1) Based on rates published in Attachment D-2: Downtown Miami DKl tacihties I np Generation Analysis in the Notlticatlon of Froposea (:hange (NOPC) to the Downtown Miami DR], submitted to the South Florida Regional Planning Council on September, 1994. (2) The entrancelexit split was.based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Trip Generation, 6th Edition, 1998. (3) Includes ancillary retail space. 4.3.2 Project Trip Assignment As established in the One Miami Master Traffic Study (September 8, 1998), project traffic was distributed and assigned to the study area using the average Cardinal Distribution for TAZ 664 and 665 shown in Exhibit 10. The Cardinal Distribution gives a generalized distribution of trips from a TAZ to other parts of Miami -Dade County. Submitted into the public record in connection with item On r� a er Foeman Page 15 City Clerk00' �� r� One Miami MUSP Traffic Impact Study For estimating trip distribution for the project location, consideration was given to conditions such as the roadway network accessed by the project, roadways available to travel in the desired direction, and attractiveness of traveling on a specific roadway.. Exhibit 11 shows the project trip assignment to the impacted roadway segments and intersections. Exhibit 10 Cardinal Distribution (2005 Stage) TAZ 664 & 665 Cardinal Direction Distribution NNE 11.86% ENE 6.14% ESE 0.96% 1. SSE 1.50% SSW 12.24% WSW-.25.86%° WNW 20.40% NNW 21:08% . Total 100.00% Source: Metro -Marie In— P, T.,,.._. *__ or,... — — S.E. 2 ST. 2 OD 289 I, ----------- --.- :I Ott I, ----- --------- -- --.- ----- ,\,; FIRST tO UNION BUILDING j � I , S.E. 3 ST l I 35 i 40 a o 0 40 ®\ciiii a o— 1 0 3 TZ � Ld Q N ui cn i ! l DUPONT PLAZA HOTEL — 'MIAMI RIVER d DAVID PLUMMER & ASSOCIATES,INC. P® TRANSPORTATION • • STRUCTURAL ENVIRON,ENTAL ONEMIAMI CO„a";`As,a.,.,, ��Sl PA<a�E.E�w MUSP TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY ❑D �. /z CHOPIN PLAZA — — — — — — — i NTERCONTIN NTAL OFFICE INTERCONTINENTAL �tf .. HOTEL t tt ' D O V /t 1 0 BISCAYNE BAY LEGEND A - ONE MIAMI PROJECT PARCEL DESIGNATION 250-- HOURLY VOLUME <o = SIGNAL 0 NLEI m.o. Ao ~oo r PROJECT TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT ,� ,� One Miami MUSP Traffic Impact SW6, 4.4 FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS WITH PROJECT Using the trip assignments from the previous sections, the project trips, background growth and committed development trips were combined with the adjusted 2000 existing traffic to get the total 2003 traffic on the impacted roadway segments. Exhibit 12 shows the total PM peak hour traffic volumes at the roadway links and intersections under study. Exhibit 13 shows the resulting LOS at the intersections under study. Intersection capacity analysis worksheets are provided in Appendix B. Exhibit 13 Future Intersection Capacity Analysis Results with Project Weekday PM Peak Hour Conditions Intersection LOS LOS with Improvements 1. Biscayne Boulevard / Chopin Plaza B NA 2. SE 2 Street / Biscayne Boulevard F C 3. SE 2 Street /SE 2 Avenue F B 4. SE 2 Street /SE 3 Avenue E NA 5. I-95 Ramps / SE 3 Street /SE 2 Avenue F E 6. SE 3 Street /SE 3 Avenue C NA 7. SE 3 Street / Biscayne Boulevard D NA 8. SE 4 Street /SE 2 Avenue F D 9. SE 4 Street /SE 3 Avenue A NA 10. Biscayne Boulevard/Main Driveway B NA 11. Biscayne Boulevard/Express Driveway (2) B NA Source: DPA Note: �')NA: Not Applicable (2) Unsignalized Submitted into , the public .. record in connection with item 1 — on rf- ,r Foernan Page 18 City clerk Q 0 logr s 0 Q 41 A —.. ❑D J`95. ❑D 4 84 v 2, 346 Lr ��..-..-..-...-..---- � I I� U CN .0 I I j FIRST UNION BUILDING j I I S.E. 3 ST I I ; ----..-..-..-..-..-.--------- BAYFRONT PARK ,CHOPIN PLAZA — — — — — NTERCONTIN NTAL OFFICE INTERCONTINENTAL HOTEL One Miami MUSP Traffic Impact Slu4 It is anticipated that delays will be experienced by traffic at the intersections of SE 2 Street/Biscayne Boulevard, SE 2 Street/SE.2 Avenue, I-95 ramp/SE 3 Street/SE 2 Avenue, and,SE 4 Street/SE 2 Avenue with the existing signal phasing and timing. Signal re -timing changes were tested to establish if operations could be improved to meet future traffic demand, given the existing lane configurations. Signal re -timing would provide the required capacity to serve future traffic demand at the intersections of SE 2 Street/Biscayne Boulevard, SE 3 Street/SE 2 Avenue, and SE 4 Street/SE 2 Avenue. In order to meet future traffic demands, it is recommended that a traffic signal be installed at the main driveway to One Miami on Biscayne Boulevard and lane reconfiguration at SE 2 Street/SE 2 Avenue. The afternoon peak hour express exit operates above capacity as' a stop condition. Intersection capacity analysis for these intersections was performed with the recommended signal timing adjustments (worksheets are included in Appendix B). The results of this analysis are also shown on Exhibit 13. Roadway link analysis was performed for future traffic conditions with the project. The resulting roadway link analysis is presented in Exhibit 14. All roadway links analyzed are projected to operate above the established LOS E threshold. Exhibit 14. Future Roadway Capacity Analysis with Project Weekday PM Peak Hour Conditions Peak Direction Roadway Limits Direction Number of Volume Service LOS Lanes Volume (LOS E) Biscayne North of NB 4LD 1,455 C Boulevard SE 2 Street SB 4 LD 1,423 3,140 C Brickell South of NB 2LD 1,355 2,560 C Avenue SE 4 Street SB 3LD 1,724 C SE 2 Avenue just north of 2 Street SB 3L One-way 762 3,170 C SE 2 Street just west of SE 2 Ave WB 2L One-way 545 2,100 C SE 3 Street just west of SE 2 Ave EB 2LD 1,750 D WB 2LD 1966 Source: Generalized Peak Hour Peak Directional Volumes, FDOT's 1998 LOS Manual. Submitted into the public Page 20 item on rcLi Walter Foeman City Clerk 0 0 - I "A 3 r) One Miami MUSP Traffic Impact Studi, 5.0 CONCLUSIONS An assessment of the PM peak hour traffic associated with the development of Parcel A, increment one of One Miami, was performed in accordance with the requirements of the Downtown Miami DRI Development Order. Analysis of future (2003) traffic conditions with the project during PM peak hour shows that the Downtown Miami DRI's adopted Level of Service E standard will not be exceeded with the lane reconfiguration and signal timing adjustments at SE 2 Street/SE 2 Avenue in addition to signal timing adjustments at the intersections of SE 2 Street/Biscayne Boulevard, SE 3 Street/SE 2 Avenue, and SE 4 Street/SE 2 Avenue. Adequate capacity during the PM peak hour is available to accommodate the proposed project trips within the study area at the remaining intersections and on the roadway segments. The proposed One Miami project will comply with the requirements of the Downtown Miami DRI and pay Proportional Share Fees which may be used by the city for transportation improvements in the area. Submitted into the public Cuun wan - Page 21 item . on i I ut-hey Walter Foeman City Clerk 0 0 _ 111 3 7 Submitted into the public record in connection with item on Walter Foernan City Clerk 00 _ 1137 Table-1 LAOS OU LiCt14"'MTta 1U WATV4 itll . - (W KMO e9WO TMl•iP. •ef•pl •! OtMflfttp 19IICAW) . Ufleo t14t•tl/ blot e4814nti•1 CM11MttM a•f+la (w r"4 (W 1.w) YMIH•1•/ hflltvll•••1 Attf•ctl�ne/' hick! l�otrt•1 Ncroatl•n a It n (►•r mist) + i( LOM111 i.009S1} O.t02 0�1)fO4q e.l]It+Set 4 OOO1i• O O011t 0 OOt0101 0 000sfes orfita O.00N}i4 " LOW 1ASU $AM 6.0044 i.ti00 CUMCr 1.14�/ . Lt}OI lam .CD 3 CDe.e•I1/aervia e.eoat} I.W2 1.400I #."a e."m MUG a.}ln 1 e.!}>: LtStl a B rn w•1 c}.r fMq� Ltet aud1M aa.:1M Lam1.i0V 1.111.}t}i t.ltCan 113.0343 g D . usu4mlol (p•r Lw) L11i06ia tt7.3tM 24t.14/1 Lg1S 1.0000 1.1}Idlp 1.W.4164 1u.01)0 N.N4t :a.uli " t•eveotw I.I0014 /.1f04 1.t1}1 /.000i 0.0001 1.0000 LNIO O."", Cam � p Nol•OdytNwlrlel LIOItat1 I.= 4AU1 1.Ow 1.0010 1.1114 LOW 1.1001 0.4441 ny wtltr10M1 O."m t.11N t.Na4 I.IOi4 1.00l1 ll.ilq LONi 1.0000 O.NI! a «+/a.�rws« � o µus.atCD (Mt ewt e.eoQwe 3.43" a.}ias 8.4102 6.6111 .. 10.0416 19.141ecr 1.00 1f1 1.4 e� fullltlet 1.0004f14 ym yU !ram (NMU for WNW" • u Ak"s nts . it W y tut► repo at Sm New of fit kA Meer Qufstiel Maur Vokitie Trip tN• pr all of 1ul ao i derived free 1k Iaelom Illed A.LA. Ll HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.lc Inter: Chopin..Dr....and Biscayne.Blvd. City/St: Miami, FL Analyst: DPA Proj #: 00124 Dater 07/11/00 Period: 2000 PM Peak Hour E/W St: Chopin Dr. N/S St: Biscayne Blvd. SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L . T R L. T -R L T R L T R. No. Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 2 0 0 LGConfig R T L Volume 41 1229 39 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vol 4 Duration 1.00 Area Type: CBD or Similar Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left NB Left .Thru Thru P. Right Right Peds Peds WB Left SB Left P Thru Thru Right Right Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WE Right P Green 65.0 24.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 All Red _ 2.0 1.0 ` Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c. g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS- Eastbound Westbound 30.7 C. R 308 1282 0.13 0.240 30.7 C Northbound T 2975 4577 0.45 0.650 9.1 A 9.1 A Southbound L 742 3090 0.06 0.240 29.4 C 29.4 C Intersection Delay 10.4 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS B Submitted into the public record in connection with item on t Walter Foeman City.Clerk00- g r HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.1c Inter: SE 2 Street and Biscayne Blvd. City/St: Miami, FL Analyst: DPA Proj #: 00124 Date: 07/11/00 Period: 2000 PM Peak Hour E/W St: SE 2 Street N/S St: Biscayne Blvd. . SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L. T R L T R No. Lanes 2 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 LGConfig L R Volume 363 1341 Lane Width 11.0 11.0 RTOR Vol 0 Duration 1.00 Area Type: CBD or Similar Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left NB Left P Thru Thru Right Right Peds Peds WB Left SB Left '. Thru Thru Right Right P Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 71.0 17.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 All Red 2.0 2.0 '.Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound Westbound Northbound L 461 2710 0.86 0.170 61.9 E 61.9 E Southbound 7.9 A R 2582 3637 0.56 0.710 7.9 A Intersection Delay =.19.4 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B Submitted into the public record in connection with item 1 on rt Walter Foeman City Clerk QO-113? HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.1c Inter: SE 2 Street and -SE 2 Avenue City/St: Miami, FL Analyst: DPA Proj #: 00124 Date: 07/12/00 Period: 2000.PM Peak Hour E/W St: SE 2 Street N/S St: SE 2 Avenue SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound South L T R L T R L T R L T 11 No. Lanes 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 LGConfig L LT T R Volume 2244 341 457 95 Lane Width 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 RTOR Vol 19 Duration- 1.00 Area Type: CBD or Similar Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left NB Left Thru Thru Right Right Peds Peds X WB Left P SB Left Thru =P Thru P Right Right P Peds X Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 54.0 36.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 All Red 1.0 1.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound Westbound L 832 1540 1.18 0.540 367.4 F LT 1027 1902 1.61 0.540 Northbound Southbound T 828 2301 0.56 0.360 28.5 C 27.6 C R 496 1377 0.16 0.360 22.4 C Intersection Delay = (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = Submitted into the public record in connection with item a on Qz- Walter Foeman City Clerk Q ®- 11 3 7 • El HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.1c Inter: SE 2 Street and SE 3 Avenue City/St: Miami, FL Analyst: DPA Proj #: 00124 Date: 07/12/00 Period: 2000 PM Peak Hour E/W St: SE 2 Street N/S St: SE 3 Avenue SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes 0 0 0 0 5 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 LGConfig TR L LT Volume 1963 82 742 247 Lane Width 11.0 11.0 11.0 RTOR Vol 8 Duration 1.00 Area Type: CBD or Similar Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2. 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left NB Left P Thru Thru P Right Right Peds Peds WB Left SB Left Thru P Thru Right P Right Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 52.0 40.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0, All Red 0.0 0.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound Westbound TR 2933 5641 0.82 0.520 22.7 C 22.7 C Northbound L 616 1540 0.57 0.400 27.1 C LT 816 2041 1.00 0.400 91.9 F 72.4 E Southbound Intersection Delay = 39.0 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = D Submitted into the public record in connection with item 2LC on rc Walter Foeman City Clerk 0 0 - I 13 HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.1c Inter: SE 3 Street and SE 2 Avenue City/St: Miami, FL Analyst: DPA Proj #: 00124 Date: 07/12/00 Period: 20'00 PM Peak Hour E/W St: SE 3 Street N/S St: SE 2 Avenue SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY No. Lanes Eastbound L T R Westbound L T R Northbound L T R Southbound L T R 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 -0 .0 0 3 0 LGConfig T R TR Volume 356 390 1260 1581 Lane. Width 11.0 11.0 11.0 RTOR Vol 100 9.00 Duration 1.00 Area Type: CBD or Similar Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left NB Left Thru P Thru Right P Right Peds Peds WB Left SE Left Thru Thru P Right Right P Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 32.0 60.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 All Red 0.0 0.0, Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound T 519 1621 0.73 0.320 39.4 D 36.3 D R 547 1708 0.56 0.320 32.5 C Westbound Northbound Southbound TR 1990 3316 1.04 0.600 106.5. F 106.5 F Intersection Delay = 88.9 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = F Submitted into the public record in connection with item 2L!C on Walter Foernan City Clerk QQ-11,13r? HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.1c Inter: SE 3 Street and SE 3 Avenue City/St: Miami, FL Analyst: DPA Proj #: 00124 Date: 07/12/00 Period: 2000 PM Peak Hour E/W St: .SE 3 Street N/S'Stc SE 3 Avenue SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION.SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L- T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes 0 1. 0 0 1 0 0 3:' 0 0'. 0 0 LGConfig LT LT TR Volume 35 54 113 225 772 77 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR "Vol 0 Duration 11.00 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1. 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left P NB Left Thru P Thru P Right Right P Peds Peds WB Left P SB Left Thru P Thru. Right Right Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 11.0 41.0 36.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 4.0 All Red 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay.LOS Delay LOS Eastbound LT 205 1863 0.48 0.110 50.0 D 50.0 D Westbound LT 766 1869, 0.49 0.410 24.1 C 24.1 C Northbound TR 1842 5116 0.51 0.360 26.1 C 26.1 C Southbound Intersection Delay = 27.2 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C Submitted into tine public record in connection with item ,!- on _/.z4tUk,-j Walter Foeman City Clerk .00 .1137 HCS: Agnalized Intersections Release 3.1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS Analyst: ONE MIAMI PARCEL A Intersection: SE 3 STREET/BISCAYNE BLVD . Count Date: 2000 EXISTING Time Period: PM PK Intersection Orientation: North -South Major St. Vehicle Volume Data: Movements: 2 10 11 ------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------ Volume: 250 67 247 HFR: 263 71 260 PHF: 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHV: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 0.02 0.02 0.02 Pedestrian Volume Data: Movements: Flow: Lane width: Walk speed: o Blockage: Median Type: None # of vehicles,: 0 Flared approach Movements.: # of vehicles: Eastbound 0 # of vehicles: Westbound 0 - Lane usage for movements 1,2&3 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ N Y N N N N N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for movements .4, 5&6 approaSbbmitted into the public, Lane 1 rec'&Fir� connection With Lane 3 I' T R L IterTT � On lc T R Walter Foeman City Clerk 0 0' 11 37 N N N N N N N N N Channelized:. N Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 7.,8&9 approach: Lane-1 Lane :2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T, R N N N N N N N N N :Channelized: N .,.. Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 10,11&12 approach•c Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T. R L. T R Y N N Y Y N N N N Channelized: ,. N :. Grade: 0.00 Data for Computing.Effect of Delay to Major.Street Vehicles:: Northbound Southbound Shared In volume, major th vehicles:. 0 0 Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: 0 0 Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: 1700 1700 Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: 1.700 1700 Number of major street through lanes: 1 0 .Length of'study period, hrs: 1:00 14orksheet.4 Critical Gap.and Follow-up time calculation. Critical Gap Calculations: Movement 10 11 t c,base '7.1 6:5 t c,by 1.0 1.0 P by 0.02 .0.02 t c,g 0.2 0.2 G 0.00 0'.00 Submitted into the public t 3 , It 0.7 0.0 record in connection with t c , T : item on-4T`-Lk¢L 1 stage 0.00 0. o o Walter Foeman City Clerk 0— 113r� . t c 1 stage 6.4 6.5 Follow .Up Time Calculations: Movement 10 11 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ t f,base 3.5 4.0 . t f,HV O::i9 0.9 - P by 0.02 0.02 t f - 3.-5 4.0 ----------------------------------- --------------------------------------------- ..Worksheeb 6 Impedance and capacity equations 'Step '3 : TH from Minor 'St :• 8 11 Conflicting Flows 263 Potential Capacity 642 Impedance Factor 1.00 ,Pedestrian .Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 1.00 Movement Capacity 642 Probability of Queue free St. 0.60. . Step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 Conflicting Flows 263 Potential Capacity 726 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor., 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 1.00 Movement Capacity 726 Worksheet 8 Shared Lane Calculations Shared Lane Calculations Movement ;'. 7 8 9, 10 11 12 v (vph) I II ------------ 71 260 Movement Capacity 726 642 Shared Lane Capacity ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 651 Worksheet 10 delay,queue length, and,LOS Submi'ted into the pu9bctc Movement 1 4 record7In ConNebtion With 10 11 12 ------------------------------ -.--stem -22L-Qn----16-----=- ---------------- 1 •---- Walter Foernan - - - - City Clerk ----- -- - - - - -- v (vph) II. 35 I. 295 C m(vph) 726 651 v/c 0.05 0.45 9596 queue length Control Delay 10.2 15.1 LOS B C Approach Delay : 14.6 Approach LOS ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- B Submitted into the public record in connection with item , on uz-hei Walter Foeman City Clerk00' r HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.1c Inter: SE 4 Street and SE 2 Avenue City/St: Miami, FL Analyst: DPA Proj #: 00124 Date: 07/12/00 Period: 2000 PM Peak Hour E/W St: SE 4 Street N/S St: SE 2 Avenue SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 3 0 LGConfig R L T Volume 1462. 246 1254 Lane Width 11.0 11.0 11.0 RTOR Vol 0 Duration 1.00 Area Type: CBD or Similar Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left NB Left Thru Thru Right Right P Peds Peds WB Left SB Left P Thru Thru P P Right Right Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 68.0 22.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 All Red 1.0 1.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound Westbound Northbound 161.6 F R 1499 2204 1.07 0.680 161.6 F Southbound L 643 2925 0.42 0.220 35.5 D T 4203 4424 0.33 0.950 0.4 A 6.1 A Intersection Delay = 82.9 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = F Submitted into the public record in connection with item on Walter Foeman City Clerk Q®-113"? HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3..1c Inter: SE 4 Street and SE 3 Avenue City/.St:.Miami,.FL Analyst: DPA Proj #: 00124 Date: 07/12/00 Period: 2000.PM Peak Hour E/W St: SE 4 Street N/S St: SE 3-Avenue No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol ,Eastb L T _SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY R IWestbound Northbound L T R I L T R 2 2 -,0 L TR 573 1004 35 12.0 12.0 0 0 0 0 0 :2 0 TR 22 9 12.0 0 _Southbound L T R 0 .0 0 Duration 1.00 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 -6 7 8 EB Left P ,NB Left Thru P Thru P Right P Right P .Peds Peds WB Left -SB Left Thru Thru Right Right Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 79.0 13.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 All Red 0.0 0.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 2767 3502 0.22 0.790 2.8 A TR 2838 3592 0.39 0.790 3.6 A 3.3 A Westbound Northbound TR 450 3458 Southbound 0.07 0.130 38.5 D 38.5 D Intersection Delay = 4.0 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = A Submi1ed into the public record in connection with item a6L on Q& Walter Foernan City Clerk 00-1 37 Future Conditions without project Submitted into the public record in connection with item. on nbei - Walter Foernan City Clerk Q ®_ 11 3 7 Inter: Chopin Dr. Analyst: DPA Date: 07/12/00 E/W St: Chopin Dr. HCS: Signalized Intersections Release'3.1c and Biscayne Blvd City/St: Miami, FL Proj #: 00124 Period: PM Peak Hour w/o project N/.S St: Biscayne Blvd., SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T. R L T R L T R L. T R No. Lanes 0 0 0 0. 0 1 0 .3 0 2 0 0. LGConfig R T L Volume 42 1316 40 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vol 4 Duration- 1.00 Area Type: CBD or Similar Signal Operations-' Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left NB Left Thru Thru P Right Right Peds Peds WB Left SB Left P Thru Thru Right Right Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB .Right WB Right P Green 65.0 .24.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 All Red 2.0 1.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs, Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach .Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound Westbound 30.7 C . R 308 1282 0.13 0.240. 30.7 C. Northbound T 2975 4577 0.48 0.650 9.5 A 9.5 A Southbound L 742 3090 0.06 0.24.0 29.4 C 29,.4 C Intersection Delay = 10.6 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B Submiyted into the public record in connection with item P2—<- on rt kw Walter Foeman City Clerk 00 _ 111 40311, HCS:.Signalized Intersections Release 3.1c Inter;: SE 2 Street and Biscayne Blvd. City/St: Miami, FL Analyst: DPA Proj #: 00124 Date: 07/10/00 Period: PM Peak Hour w/o project E/W St: SE 2.Street N/S St: Biscayne .Blvd. SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T. R No. Lanes 0 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .LGConfig L R Volume 391 1401 Lane Width 11.0 11.0 RTOR Vol 0 Duration 1.00 Area Type: CBD or Similar Signal Operations, Phase Combination 1 2 31 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left NB Left - P Thru Thru Right Right Peds Peds WB Left SE Left Thru Thru Right Right P Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 71.0 17.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0. All Red 2..0 2.0 .,Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj.Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c . g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound Westbound Northbound L 461 2710 0.92 0.170 77.4 E 77.4 E Southbound 8.2 A R 2582 3637 0.59 0.710• 8.2. A Intersection Delay = 23.3 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C Submitted into the public record in connection with item L. on _ud u Ala Walter Foeman City Clerk "00' r • • HCS:,Signalized Intersections Release 3.1c Inter: SE 2 Street and SE 2 Avenue City/St-'Miami, FL Analyst: DPA Proj #: 00124 Date: 07/10/00 Period: PM Peak Hour w/o project E/W St: SE 2 Street N/S St: SE-2.Avenue SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L. T R No. Lanes 0 2 1 0 0 0 1. 2 0 0 0- 0 LGConfig L LT T R Volume 2348 351 508 98 Lane Width 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 RTOR Vol 19 Duration 1.00 Area Type: CBD or Similar Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left NB Left Thru Thru Right Right Peds Peds .X. WB Left P SB Left Thru P Thru, P Right Right. P " Peds' X Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right' Green 64.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 All Red 1.0 1.0 Cycle Length:,100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane - -Group Flow Rate.. Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound Westbound L 986 1540 - 1.,04 0.640 129.2 F LT 1217` 1902_ 1.42 0.640 772.9 F 532.1 F Northbound Southbound T 598 2301 0.87 0.260 53.5 D 50.4 D R 358 1377 0.23 0.260 30.6 C. Intersection Delay 446.1 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = F Submitted into the public record in connection with item on Walter Foeman City Clerk HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.1c Inter: SE 2 Street and SE 3 Avenue City/St: Miami, FL Analyst: DPA Proj #: 00124 Date: 07/11/00 Period: PM Peak Hour w/o project E/W St: SE 2 Street N/S St: SE 3 Avenue 'SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes 0 0 0 0 5 0 1 2 0 0 0. 0 LGConfig TR L -LT. Volume 2058 84, 764 254 Lane Width 11.0 11.*0 11.0 RTOR Vol 8 Duration 1.00 Area Type: CBD or Similar Signal Operations . Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB . Left NB Left P Thru Thru P Right Right Peds Peds WB Left SB Left Thru P Thru Right P Right Peds Peds ' NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right_ Green 52.0 '40.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 All Red 0.0 0.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs . Intersection Performance_Summary " Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios -Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound Westbound TR 2934 5642 0.86 0.520 24.3 C 24.3 C Northbound L 616 1540 0.58 0.400 27.6 C LT 816 2041 1.03 0.400 122.6. F 94.0 F _ Southbound Intersection Delay = 46.9 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS.=, D SubmittQd into the public record in connection with #.item 2i. on Walter Foeman . City Clerk Q O -113 7 I • HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.1c Inter: SE 3 Street and SE 2 Avenue City/St: Miami, FL Analyst- DPA Proj #: 00124 Date: 07/11/00 Period: PM Peak Hour w/o project E/W St: SE 3- Street N/S St: SE 2 Avenue SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 LGConfig T R TR Volume 367 422 1354,1646 Lane Width 11.0 1i.0 -11.0 RTOR Vol 150 1050 Duration 1.00 Area Type: CBD or Similar Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left NB Left Thru P Thru Right P Right Peds Peds WB Left SB Left " Thru Thru P Right Right P Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB. Right Green 32.0 60.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 All Red 0.0 0.0 Length: 100.0 secs ,Cycle Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound T 519 1621 0.75 0.320 40.7 D 36.8 D R 547 1708 0.53 0.320 31.5 C Westbound Northbound Southbound TR 2004 3340 1.03 0.600 103.0 F 103:0 F Intersection Delay = 86.7 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = F Submitted into the public record in connection with . item on -42dLqh2a Walter Foernan City Cleric Q®-1 37 HCS: Signalized -Intersections Release 3.1c Inter: SE 3 Street and SE 3 Avenue -City/St': Miami, FL Analyst DPA Proj #: 00124 Date: 07/12/00 Period: PM Peak Hour w/o -project E/W St: SE 3 Street .,NIS St: SE 3 Avenue 'SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY V. tbound Westbound Northbound Southbound as L T R L T R L T R L T R No. :Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 LGConfig LT LT TR Volume 36 56 117 232 796 79.'. Lane Width 11.0 11.0 11:0 RTOR"Vol 0 Duration 1.00 ..Area ,Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 .5 6 7 8 EB Left P NB Left Thru P -Thru P Right Right P Peds Peds WB .Left P SB 'Left Thru P Thru Right Right Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 11.0 41.0 36.0 . Yellow 4.0 4.0 4.0 All Red 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound LT 196 1802 0.51 0.110 51.1 D 51.1 D Westbound LT 740 1806 0.51 0.410 24.6 C 24.6 C Northbound TR 1781 4946 0.53 0.360 26.5 C 26.5 C Southbound Intersection Delay = 27.7 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C Submitted into the public record in connection with item on_41--lNbei Walter Foernan City Clerk Q Q —1-0 31� HCS: Agnalized Intersections Release 3.1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL;(TWSC) ANALYSIS_ Analyst: ONE MIAMI PARCEL A Intersection: SE 3 STREET/BISCAYNE BLVD Count Date: FUTURE W/O PROJECT Time Period: PM PK Intersection Orientation: North -South Major St. Vehicle Volume Data: Movements: 2 10 11 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Volume: 257 - - 69 254 HFR: 271 73 267. PHF: 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHV: -------------------------------------------------=---------------------------------- 0.02 0.02 0.02 Pedestrian Volume Data: Movements: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Flow: Lane width: Walk speed: Blockage: Median Type: None ## of vehicles: 0 Flared approach Movements: # of vehicles: Eastbound 0 # of vehicles: Westbound 0 Lane usage for movements 1,2&3 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ N Y N N N N N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 4, 5&6 appro�&brnitted into the public Lane 1 reCbMeir1 connection With Lane 3 L T R L iterff $n _42d_ft.,&a T R Walter Foernan City Clerk Q 0 -1113 7 N N N N N N N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 7,8&9 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- N N N N N N N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 10,11&12 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Y N N Y Y N N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles: Northbound Southbound Shared In volume, major th vehicles: 0 0 Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: 0 0 Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: 1700 1700 Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: 1700 1700 Number of major street through lanes: 1 0 Length of study period, hrs: 1.00 Worksheet 4 Critical Gap and Follow-up time calculation. Critical Gap Calculations: Movement 10 11 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ t c,base 7.1 6.5 t c,hv 1.0 1.0 P by 0.02 0.02 t c,g 0.2 0.2 G 0.00 0.00 Submitted into the PubliC t 3 , It 0.7 0.0 record in connection with t c , T : item P2-<- on 1 stage 0.00 0% 00 Walter Foeman City Clerk00- t c 1 stage 6.4 6.5 Follow Up Time Calculations: Movement 10 11 t f,base .3.5 4.0 t f,HV 0.9 .0.9, P hv` _ 0.02 0.02 t f -------------------------- 3.5 4.0 --------------------------------------------------------- Worksheet 6 Impedance and capacity equations Step 3: TH from Minor St. 8 Tl Conflicting Flows 271 Potential Capacity 636 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 1.00 Movement Capacity 636 Probability of Queue free St. 0.58 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 Conflicting Flows 271 Potential Capacity 719 Pedestrian Impedance -Factor 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 1.00 Movement Capacity 719 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Worksheet 8 Shared Lane Calculations Shared Lane Calculations Movement 7 8 9. 10 11 12 . ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------- v(vph) 73 267 Movement Capacity 719 636 Shared Lane Capacity 645 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Worksheet 10 delay,queue length, and LOS Submitted into the public Movement 1 4 recor& in conliection-Ath---10 11 12 ------------------------------------item - -Q�- - « ---- ----------------- Walter Foern'an - - - - - City Clerk 0 0 — I 1 317 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - N N N N N N N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for 'movements 7,8&9 approach: Lane.l Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R. L. T R N N N.. N N N. N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 10,11&12 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L --------------------------------- T R ---------------------------------------------------- Y N N Y Y N N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles: Northbound Southbound Shared In volume, major th vehicles: 0 0 Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: 0 0 Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: - 1700 1700 Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: 1700 1700 Number of major street through lanes: 1 0 Length of study period, hrs: 1.00 - Worksheet 4 Critical Gap and Follow-up time.calculation. Critical Gap Calculations: Movement 10 11 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ t c,base 7.1- 6.5 t c,hv 1.0 1.0 P by ' 0.02 0.02 t c,g 0.2 0.2 G 0.00 0.00 Submitted into the public t 3 , It 0.7 0.0 record in connection with t _ c , T : item ,22-6Z on r� 1 stage 0.00 0.00 Waiter Foernan City Clerk®'�r v(vph) 36 304 C m(vph) 719 645 vac .0.05 0.47 95% queue.length Control Delay. 10.3 15.5 LOS C Approach Delay.15.0 Approach LOS _ B 5ubrni1--d into the public record in connection with 22 item 1on fc Walter Foeman City Clerk oO—�r HCS: Signalized Intersections Release.3.1c Inter: SE 4 Street and SE 2 Avenue City/St:'Miami, FL Analyst: DPA 'Proj #: 00124 Date: 07/12/:00 Period: PM Peak Hour w/o.project E/W St: SE 4 Street.*, N/S St: SE 2.,.Avenue :,SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY. Eastbound westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T. R L._• T R. L T R No. Lanes 0 0 0' .0 0 0 0 0 2 2' 3 0 LGConfig ;_R L. T Volume .1572 247 1366 Lane Width 11.0 11.0 11.0 RTOR Vol 0 Duration 1.00 Area Type: CBD or Similar Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left NB Left , Thru Thru Right Right P Peds Peds WB: Left SB Left P Thru Thru P P Right Right. Peds Peds NB Right- EB Right . SB .Right WB Right Green 68..0 22.0 Yellow :4,.0 4.0 All Red Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay-LOS Eastbound Westbound Northbound 298.6 F R 1499 2204 1.15- `0.680 298.6. F Southbound L 643 2925 0.42 0.220 35.6 D T 4203 4424 0.36 0.950 0.4 A 5.8 .,A Intersection.Delay = 15.0.2 `(sec/veh) Intersection LOS = F S(.ibmitted into the public record in connection with item , L on Walter Foeman City Clerk ®" r HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3,1c Inter: SE 4 Street and SE 3 Avenue City/St: Miami, FL Analyst: DPA •Proj #: 00124 Date: 07/12/00 Period: PM Peak:Hour w/o:project E/W St: SE 4 Street N/S St: SE 3 Avenue SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R. L:. T. ,_,.R L T R No. Lanes 0 0 -2 0 0 0 0 .0 0 2 2 0• LGConfig L TR TR Volume 591 1100 36 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12 0 RTOR Vol 0 0 Duration 1.00 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left P NB Left Thru P Thru P _ ... Right P Right P Peds -Peds . WE ..Left SB Left Thru Thru Right Right Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WE Right Green 79.0 13.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 All Red 0.0 0.0 ^ycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity` (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 2767 3502 0.22 0.790 2.9 A TR 2838 3593 0.42 0.790 3.8 A 3.5 A Westbound Northbound TR 450. 3462 0.07 0.130 38.5 D 38.5 D Southbound Intersection Delay = 4.1 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = A Submitted into the public record in connection with item 1 on -a!kri Walter Foernan City Clerk QQ-1127 Submitted -into the public record in connection with item ,P2—!S'-- on bu Walter Foernan City Cleric 0.0 -11 3 7 HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.1c Inter: Chopin Dr. and Biscayne Blvd. City/St: Miami, FL Analyst: DPA Proj #: 00124 Date: 07/10/00 Period: PM Peak Hour w/project E/W St: Chopin Dr. N/S St: US-1/Biscayne Blvd.. SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 3 0 2 0 0 LGConfig R T L Volume 42 1417 40 Lane Width 12.0. 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vol 4 Duration 1.00 Area Type: CBD or Similar Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left NB Left Thru Thru P Right Right Peds Peds WE Left SB Left P Thru Thru Right Right Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WE Right P. Green 65.0 24.0 Yellow 4•.0 4.0 All Red 2.0 1.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound Westbound R 602 2508 Northbound T 2975 4577 Southbound L 742 3090 29.6 C 0.07 0.240 29.6 C 0.52 0.650 9.9 A 9.9 A 0.06 0.240 29.4 C 29.4 C Intersection Delay = 10.9 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B Submitted into the pubic record in connection with item 2& <- on Walter Foeman City Clerk QO-1137 HCS-Signals 3.1c File:SE2ST BISC:HCS Page 1 HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.1c Inter: SE 2 Street and Biscayne Blvd. City/St: Miami, FL Analyst: DPA Proj ##: 00124 Date: 07/10/00 Period: PM Peak Hour w/ project E/W St: SE 2 Street N/S St: US-1/Biscayne Blvd. No. Lanes LGConf ig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol Eastbound L T R 0 0 0 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Westbound Northbound L T R L T R 0 0 0 2 0 .0 L 660 11.0 Southbound L T R 0 0 3 R 1420 11.0 0 Duration 1.00 Area Type: CBD or Similar Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6. 7 8 EB Left NB Left P Thru Thru Right Right Peds Peds WB Left SB Left Thru Thru Right Right P Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right r Green 71.0 17.0 cU Yellow 4.0 4.0 a m U All Red 2.0 2.0 o L2 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs U Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach c o Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS .r Eastbound a U E Westbound Northbound L 461 2710 1.56 0.170 �i Southbound 1 8.3 A R 2582 3637 0.60 0.710 8.3 A Intersection Delay -- ' (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = HCS-Signals 3.1c File:Se2st2ay.hi,s, Page 1 HCS: Signalized.Intersections Release 3.1c Inter: SE 2 Street and SE 2 Avenue City/St: Miami, FL Analyst: DPA Proj #: 00124 Date: 07/10/00 Period: PM Peak Hour w/proj. E/W St: SE2 Street N/S St: SE 2 Avenue SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 LGConfig L LT T R Volume 2595 392 531 98 Lane Width 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 RTOR Vol 20 Duration 1.00 Area Type: CBD or Similar Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 .3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left NB Left Thru Thru Right Right Peds Peds X WB- - Left P. SB Left Thru P Thru P Right Right P Peds X Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right o co Le Green 64.0 26.0 .0 aa) E Yellow 4.0 4.0 Q U .All Red 1.0 1 .. 0 o Cycle Length-: 100.0 secs U Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach o o Lane Group. Flow Rate _ V Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound z ` Westbound L 986 1540 1.16 0.640 310.3 F LT 1217 1902 1.57 0.640 Northbound Southbound T 598 2301 0.91 0.260 61.1 E 57.2 E R 358 1377 0.22 0.260 30.5 C Intersection Delay = (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = HCS-Signals 3.1c File:Se2st3ay.h6s Page 1 HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.1c Inter: SE 2 Street and SE 3 Avenue City/St: Miami, FL Analyst: DPA Proj #: 00124 Date: 07/10/00 Period: PM Peak Hour w/project E/W St: SE 2 Street. N./S St: SE 3 Avenue SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes 0 5 0 1. 2 0 0 0 0 0--. 0 0 LGConfig TR L LT Volume 2346 84 764 254 Lane Width 11.0 11.0 11.0 RTOR Vol 8 Duration 1.00 Area Type: CBD or Similar Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left NB _Left P Thru Thru P Right Right Peds Peds ......WB:. Left SB Left Thru P Thru Right P Right Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right t Green 52.0 40.0 ='b � (D Yellow 4.0 4.0 c.3 Q EU. All Red 0.0 0.0 c . o Cycle. Length: 100.0 secs w � U Intersection Performance Summary' °' = Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach c o Lane Group Flow Rate - �� Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS e East U E Westbound TR 2935 Northbound L 616 LT 816 Southbound 5645 0.97, 1540 0.58 2041 0.520 38.9 D 0.400 27.6 C 0.400 122.6 F 94.0 F Intersection Delay = 55.2 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = E dam HCS-Signals 3.1c File:Se3st2ay.hcs Page 1 HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.1c Inter: SE 3 Street and SE 2 Avenue City/St: Miami, FL Analyst: DPA Proj #: 00124 Date: 07/10/00 Periods PM Peak Hour w/project. E/W St: SE 3 Street N/S St: SE 2 Avenue SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION'SUMMARY. Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R -L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 LGConfig T R TR Volume 367 457 1501 1769 Lane Width 11.0 11.0 11.0 RTOR Vol 150 1130 Duration 1.00 Area Type: CBD or Similar Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left NB Left Thru P 'Thru Right P Right Peds Peds WB - Left 'SB Left Thru Thru P Right Right P Peds "Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right E Green 32 . 0.. 60.0 co. Yellow 4.0 4.0 a U All Red 0.0 0.0 o Cycle Length: 100.0 secs, U Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach c o Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS a) - a Eastbound E T 519 1621 0.75 0.320 40.7 D 37.4 D R 547 1708 0.60 0.320 33.4 C Westbound Northbound �.. e� Southbound TR 2006 3344 1.14 0.600 270.5 F 270.5 F Intersection Delay.= 214.7 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = F HCS: Signali.,zed Intersections.Release 3:1c Inter: SE 3 Street and SE 3„Avenue City/St: Miami, FL Analyst: DPA. 'Proj #: 00124 x, Date: 07/10/00 ' Period: PM Peak Hour w/-project . E/W St: SE 3 Street- NIS St: SE.3 Avenue :.SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T _ R L „T._ _R L T. :r° .R L. T. R No. Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 LGConfig LT LT TR Volume 36 56' 117 232 796 79 Lane Width; 12.:0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vol 0 Duration 1.00 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6.. 7. 8 EB Left P NB Left Thru P Thru P Right Right P Peds Peds WB Left A SB Left Thru A Thru Right Right Peds Peds NB Right ER Right. SB Right WB Right Green 11. 0..: 41.0 .3 6 . 0 Yellow 4 0 4.0 4.0 All Red 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs 'Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group .Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound LT 205 1863 -0.50 0.11050.5. D. 50.5 D Westbound LT 766 1869 0.51 0.410 22.5 C 22.5 C Northbound TR 1842 5117 0.53 0.360 26.4 C 26 4 C. _ Southbound Intersection Delay 27.0 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS C, Submitted Into the public record in connection with item 1- on Walter Foernan City Clerk . ®� r: HCS: Unsig-chud idersedions Release 0 TVO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS Analyst: ONE MIAMI PARCEL A Iniersedion: SE 3 STREET/BISCAYNE BLVD CDuni Dde: frAure rr/proj - - - Time Period PM PK hcrsecfion Orierddim Nash-Sadh Mq'or Si. Vehvcle Vdume Dda Maernenfs: 2 1D 11 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Vdurne: 527 69 254 HFR: 555 73 261 PHF: D.95 0.95 D.95 PHV: D.D2 D.D2 D.D2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Ped.sirion VdumE Oda Iv"DJ CmerI 5: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flu Lane 'Aidh Wdk speed 7 Blockage: . Medion Type: None of vehicles: D Flored upprooch Mmmuis d vehicles Easibard D of vehicles: Wesibamd D Lone usage for rnwemenis 1,2&3 opprooch Lane 1 Lone 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- N Y N N N N N N N Channelited N Grade: NO i.one usogc is mmmenis 4,5&6 opproach Lone 1 Lone 2 Ln 3 L T R L T R L T R ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- N N N N N N N N N Ch endued N G�ari�; D.DD rre uso;^ Irr; movcmenfs 1,8&9 opprooch: Lone 1 Lone 2 Lori 3 SUt)Mitted into the QUbtiC L T R L T' R L T R record in. connection With ----------------------------------------- --------------- item--} f►ot-- N N N N N N N N N Walter Foeman City Clerk 0 0 " 11317 Chowlited N Grode D.DD Lone usoce to mmrneNs 1D,11&12 gWDOch Lone 1 Lone 2 Lone 3 L T R L T H L T R ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------- y N N y y N N N N Chu nelited N Grode, D DD Ddo fDr Cmpoting Effed d DdDj to Mgor Sireet Vehicles Nathbo tot SDdhbDtnd Shored In volurne, rngor th vehicles: D D 5hcred In vdume, rnyDr d vetrcles: D D 5d {low rote, mi'a th vetides. 17DD 17DD Sd flow rote, mgor d vehicles: 17DD 17DD Number d mq'Dr street Wouh IOnes: 1 D Lergth.d sludl period, hrs: 1.DD ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- - Worksheet 4 Criticd Cop ad FODA-up time cdcADn Crilicd GOP Cdcddions: MovmeN 1D 11 ---------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------- I c,bO.se 7.1 6.5 f 0 1:D 1.D P IN D.D2 D.D2 t c,g D? D.2 G D.DD 0.00 t 3,It 0.7 D.D t CT 1 stoge D.DD D.DD is 1 slope 5.4 5.5 Fdlow Up Time Cdcddioni Mmrrml 10 11 ------------------ 1 t,bose 3.5 --------- — ------------------------------------------------------------------ 4.1) t i,HV D 9 D.9 P fU D.D2 D.02 It ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3.5 4.1) Worksheet 6 Impeftne and copocify eolDns Slen 3: TH from Minor St. 8 Coniiicting Flows 555 Pdentid ComNd 440 juhmitted into the public Cap. A . tDicnpedLr, to icr 1.DD record in connection with Cap. A�. tocior due to frnpeding rnvrnnl 1.DD Maemerd Cwty 44D item on Probobility d Umr free 5t. D 39 Walter Foeman City Clerk : Q ® _ 111 317 Siep 4: LT from Miror St. 7 — 1D -------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------ CDAIdirg FIDE s 555 Pdeniiol Coprxify 493 Pedestnon Impedonce Fafor 1.DD Moj_ L, Min T Impedonce IDdDr 1.DD Mq L, Min A� Imp FoefDr 1.DD Cop Adj. fodor due fD ImPearul mvrnd 1 DD Maemeni CDPDcity ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 493 Worksheef 8 Shoed Lie Cdcddions Shored Lme Cdcuidiorts Mmmut 7 8 9 1D 11 12 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------- v(vph) 73 267 Mmmed Copoeity 493 44D Shoed Lut Copmty 446 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Worksheet 1D cloy,queue Iergh, and LDS Mwerned 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 v(vph) 36 3D4 C rn(vph) 493 446 v/c D.D1 0.68 95% quest luq h CDntfd Deloy 12.9 29.6 LOS 6 D Apprpoch DdDy 28.D Apprpoch LOS --------------------------------------------------- D ------------------------------------------- Submitted into the public record in connection with item 2L-c on ft- Walter Foeman City Clerk 0 0 — 113 7 HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.1c Inter: SE 3 Street and SE 3 Avenue City/St: Miami, FL Analyst: DPA Proj #: 00124 Date: 07/10/00 Period: PM Peak Hour w/ project E/W St: SE 3 Street N/S St: SE 3 Avenue SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 LGConfig LT LT TR Volume 36 56 117 232 796 79 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vol 0 Duration 1.00 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left P NB Left Thru P Thru P Right Right P Peds Peds WE Left A SB Left Thru A Thru Right Right Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WE Right Green 11.0 41.0 36.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 4.0 All Red 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary OAppr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound LT 205 1863 0.50 0.110 50.5 D 50.5 D Westbound LT 766 1869 0.51 0.410 22.5 C 22.5 C Northbound TR 1842 5117 0.53 0.360 26.4 C 26.4 C Southbound Intersection Delay = 27.0 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C • HCS: Unsignnlized Intersections Release 31c • NCO -WAY STOP CONTNOL(lSC) ANALYSIS Anolyst: ONE MIAMI PARCEL A Inlersectbn: SE 3 STREET/OISCAYNE HLVD CDA Dole future w/prol, Tine Period: PM PK Inlerseclion OrTnlolion North-SDuih Mojor St. Vehicle VDune Dolo: Maemen+s: 2 1D VDlune: 527 69 254 HFR:' 555 73 267 PHF: D.95 D 95 D 95 PHV: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ D.D2 D.D2 D.D2 ---- Pedeslrion VDlune Oda mmmnt s FIDw: Lnne w d h: WDIk speed % Hlockoge. 16MediDn Type: None N veNdrs: D Flnred opprooch MmmHs: of vehicles. EDslboUnd D of vehicles. Westbound D Lone usoge for mmmn is 1,2&3 opprooch: Lone 1 Lone 2 Lone 3 L T R L T R L T R ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- N Y N N N N N N N channelized N Grade: D.DD Lone usage iDr mmmtTs 4,5&6 uppronch. Lane 1 Lone 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- N N N N N N N N N Chonnelized N Grade: D.DD onr. usoge (or mmmrfs 7,S&9 opprooch: Lone 1 Lone 2 Lone 3 L 1 R L T R L T R ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- N N N N N N N N N Chwdited N Gfode D.DD Lone usoge for movemenls 1D,11&12 opprooch Lone 1 Lore 2 Lone 3 L T R L T R L T R ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- y N N y y N N N N Chonnelired N Grode: D.DD Ddo fa Competing Eifed d Deloy to MIjor Street Vehdes NDthbDund Sodl-aid SVM In volume, rngor th vehcles: D D Shored 1n volume, mgor H- vehcles: D D Sot Ilow rde, mq'6 th vehicles. 170D 170D Sd flow rde, rnojor d vehicles: 17DD 17D0 Number d mgor sfreel Ilrough lows: 1 D Length of sfudl period, hrs 1.0D Worksheet 4 Criticd Cop and Follow-up iM wlcJdion. Crificol Gop Colculdions: MMMN 1D 11 ------------------------------ - -------------------------------------------------------------- t c,bose 7.1 6.5 i c,fU 1.0 ID P IN D.D2 D.02 t c,g D.2 D.2 G 0.00 D OD t 3,I1 D 7 D.D f c,T: 1 sfoge D.DD D.DD I 1 sfoge 6.4 5.5 Follow Up Time Cdeddions. MmMEN 1D 11 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I f,buse 3.5 4.D i f,HV D.9 D.9 P IN D.D2 D.D2 I f 3.5 4.D ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WaksIT6 6 lmpedonce and copmci equdions Step 3 TH loom Minor Si. 8 CoNlidirsg Flows 555 oferkiol Copocity 44D Pedesirion Impedonce FDFIor IN Cop. Adj. focior dire fo Impeding mvmd 1.DD Mt MEN Copocity 44D Probobility d Queue tree St. D.39 Step 4: LT from Minor St. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 7 10 Conflicfing FIDws 555 Pdentid Copocity 493 Pedestrion Impedaice FoclDr 1.DD Moj. L, Min T Impedonce foctor 1.DD M9. L, Min T A�. Imp FDCtDr. 1.DD Cop Adj, foctor due to ImpeDng mvrnd 1.DD Maemeni Copocily ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 493 fi ksheet 8 Shoed Lone CdcA ns Shored Lone Cdcjdions Mmmol 7 8 9 1D 11 12 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------- v(vph) 13 267 Maemed Copocity 493 44D Rmd Lore Capacity 446 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Worksheet 1D delcy,queue lerr art LDS Mwemenl 1 4 7 6 9 10 11 12 v(vph) I II I 36 3D4 C m(vph) 493 446 vA D.D7 D.68 95% queue length Control Deloy 12.9 29.8 LDS 8 D Approoch Delo7 28.D Approoch LDS ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- D Page 1 HCS-Signals 3.1c File.:Se4st2ay.h6s HCS:.Signalized Intersections Release 3.1c Inter: SE 4 Street and SE 2 Avenue City/St: Miami, FL Analyst: DPA Proj #: 00124 Date: 07/10/00 Period: PM Peak Hour w/project E/W St: SE 4 Street N/S St: SE 2 Avenue _SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound Southbound L I T R L T R L T- R L T R No. Zanes LGConf ig Volume. Lane Width RTOR Vol 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 R 1602 .11.0 0 2 3 0 L T 324 1473 11.0 11.0 Duration 1.00 Area Type: CBD or Similar Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left NB Left Thru_ Thru Right Right. P Peds Peds Left SB Left P Thru Thru, P P Right Right Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB. Right s c Green 68.0 22.0 3 ai Yellow 4,. 0 4.0 CL Q) U All Red 1.0 1.0 o LL U Cycle Length: 100.0 secs .. Intersection Performance Summary o c o ro Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach c o_ Lane Group Flow Rate T,. Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS (D .��7 Eastbound _ 0 �. Westbound Northbound 337.3 F R 1499 2204 1.17 0.680 337.3 F Southbound L 643 2925 0.55 0.220 38.1 D T 4203 4424 0.39 0.950 0.5 A 7.2 A 1 O- Intersection Delay = 162.8 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = F HCS-Signals 3.1c File:Se4st3ay.hcs, Page 1 HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.1c Inter: SE 4 Street and SE 3 Avenue City/St: Miami, FL Analyst: DPA Proj #: 00124 Date: 07/10/00 Period: PM Peak Hour w/project E/W St: SE 4 Street N/S St: SE 3 Avenue SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbou L T R I L T R L T R L T No. Lanes 2 2 0. LGConfig L -TR Volume 591 1207 36 Lane Width_ 12.0 12.0 RTOR .Vol J 0 0 0 0 M 0 2 0 0 0 0 TR 23 9 12.0 0 Duration 1.00 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8' EB Left P NB Left Thru P Thru P Right P Right P Peds Peds WB Left SB Left Thru Thru Right Right Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 79.0 13.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 Q C o U All Red 0.0 0.0 0 LL �+ Cycle Length: 100.0 secs t U' Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach o o Lane Group Flow Rate �I Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS 0 cj. Eastbound C ` L 2767 3502 0.22 0.790 2.9 A TR 2839 3594 0.46 0.790 4.0 A 3.6 A Westbound Northbound TR 450 3462 0.07 .0.130 38.5 D 38.5 D Southbound a.. Intersection Delay = 4.2 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = A HCS-Signals 3.1c File:Main_dw.hcs Page 1 HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.1c Inter: Biscayne Blvd./Main Driveway City/St: Miami, FL Analyst: DPA Proj #: 00124 Date: 07/12/2000 Period: PM Peak w/project E/W St: Biscayne Blvd N/S St: Main Driveway SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 1 0 LGConf ig L T T Volume 1110 107 251 Lane Width 12.0 10.0 12.0 RTOR Vol Duration 1.00 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left A NB Left Thru A Thru A Right Right Peds Peds "WB Left SB Left Thru Thru Right Right Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right o a Green 57.0 35.0 = Yellow 4.0 4.0 a) U All Red 0.0 0.0 a L Cycle Length: 100.0 secs = U Intersection Performance'Summary °' = Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach �_ C:0 Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS ai.�� Eastbound ` Q E L 1957 3433 0.60 0.570 14.5 B T 1011 1773 0.11 0.570 9.9 A 14.1 B Westbound Northbound M T 1263 3610 0.21 0.350 22.9 C 22.9 C Southbound 1 O Intersection Delay = 15.6 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B HCS: Unslgnaized Intersections Release 3.1c TV,O-WAY STOP CONTRUL(TVSC) ANALYSIS Analyst: OPA Iyerserfion PM EXP7ESS DRIVEWAY IDA Dole NA Time Period PM PK Iniersmhm UrieNdim North -Sash Moor SI Vehft VJLM Oda MmmtNs: 2 9 Vdurne 1361 123. _ HFR. W5 129 PHF 0.95 D.95 PHV:" D.D2 D.DD Pedesirion Volume Dolo: MMMtNs. Flow: Lore Hidh Wdk speed 7 Rfockage. Medion Type None DI Vehdes: D Flored optxooch MmmMs i ol vehicles: Eostbamd D { d vehicles. Weslbud D Lone Usoge is movmENs i,2&3 opprooch Lone 1 Lone 2 Lone 3 L T R L T R L T R --------- —---------------------------------- N Y N N Y N N ------------------------------------------------- Y N Ctuwkzed. N Grade: D.DD Lie usoy icr mmmtNs 4,5&6 OWD11h Lane 1 Ln 2 Lore 3 l T R L T R L T R N N N N N N N N N Chonndized N Grede: D.DD Lune usage for mmmeNs 1,8&9 oppraoch: SUbrni;tAd into the public P Lone 1 Lo e 2 L T R L .T R L Lone 3 T R record 'in connection with --------------------------- ---- J , L � N Y N. N N N N N Walter Foeman - City Clerk 00— r� Ch�melited N Grode D.DD Lone usoge for mw mcnls 1D,11&12 opprooch Lone 1 Lone 2 Lam 3 . L.. T R L T R L T R N N N N N N N N N. Cf�ruu�lited N _ .. Grpde. HD Ddo for Cornpding Effect d Deloy fo Mq'or Street VEIICIeS Norttc" -- SDdhbak Shored In doe, mgor th vekln: D D Shred In vdune, rngor rt vehicles: D D Sd flow rde, rngor thvefreles 17DD . 1101) Sd flow rule, rngo d veNdEs 17DD 17DD Number d ml'o sfreet itv* ICTs 3 D Leng!h d sfy period, hrs: 1.DD Worksheet 4 Crificd Gop ord Fdlow-up time cdciddion Crificd GDP Cdculdions: Mwerner�. 9 - ----------------- f c,bose 6.9 t c,hr 2.D P: N D.DD u D.DD I 3,It D.D 1 c,T: 1 stoge D DD tc 1 sf oge 6.9 Fdha Up Time CdcAions. Mweme,q g 1 1.bose 3.3 t f,HV 1 D P M D.DD ff 3.3 -------------------------------------- -------------------------- ------------------------------- Wuksheet 6 IMXe Rt Dt CWlty, eq-dions Sir 1: FT horn Minor St. 9 12 ------------------------------------------------------------- Con { ci ng t lo`a; 418 ---------------------------------- F�A d Copocify PedesInon Impedonce Fodor 539 INp Submi` ed into the ubac Mwerned Ccpocity 539 record, in connection With - a Prdmbiliiy d Oceue iree St. D.76 item. 6-on a, lc ----------- -------------------------------------- -- - - - Wafter Foemafl ---- -- City .Clerk HCS-Signals 3.1c File:SE2ST BISC.HCS Pagel HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.1c Inter: SE 2 Street and Biscayne Blvd. City/St: Miami, FL Analyst: DPA .Prof #: 00124 Date: 07/13/00 Period: PM Peak Hour w/ project (iml E/W St: SE 2 Street N/S St: US-1/Biscayne Blvd.. SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R I L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes LGConf ig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 L 660 11.0 0 0 3 R 1420 11.0 0 Duration 1.00 Area Type: CBD or Similar Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left NB Left P Thru Thru Right Right Peds Peds WB Left SB Left Thru Thru Right Right. P Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right o Green 48.0 40.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 ai U All Red 2.0 2.0 0.0 LL Cycle Length: 100.0 secs E 5 U Intersection Performance Summary o c c co Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach .c Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Q. Eastbound = o E Westbound Northbound �.. L 1084 2710 0.66 0.400 27.7 C 27.7 C Southbound R 1746' 3 63 7 0.88 0.480 31.0 C Q Intersection Delay = 30.0 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C HCS-Signals 3.1c I!le:Se2st2ay.hcs Page 1 HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.1c Inter: SE 2 Street and SE 2 Avenue Analyst: DPA Date: 07/13/00 E/W St: SE 2 Street No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol Eastbound L T R 0 0 0 City/St: Miami, FL Proj #: 00124 Period: PM Peak Hour w/proj. (imp) N/S St: SE 2 Avenue SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Westbound Northbound L T R L T R 2 2 0 L LT 2595 392 11.0 11.0 Southbound L T R 0 0 0 0 3 0 TR 531 98 11.0 40 Duration 1.00 Area Type: CBD or Similar Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left NB Left Thru Thru Right Right Peds Peds X WB Left P SB Left Thru P Thru P Right Right P Peds X Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right U, Green 68.0 24.0 �' Yellow 4.0 4.0 c I U All Red 0.0 0.0 o q LL ^ Cycle Length: 100.0 secs y U Intersection Performance Summary o Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach c o Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS, Delay.LOS.�w, Eastbound = O Westbound L 2051 3016 LT 2034 2991 Northbound Southbound 0.56 0.680 3.9 A 0.94 0.680 16.9 B 12.0 B TR 824 3435 0.73 0.240 40.8 Intersection Delay = 16.8 (sec/veh) C� tl 1 D 40.8 D Intersection LOS = B HCS-Signals 3.1c File:Se3st2ay.hcs Page 1 HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.1c Inter: SE 3 Street and SE 2 Avenue City/St: Miami, FL Analyst: DPA Proj #: 00124 Date: 07/13/00 Period: PM Peak Hour w/project (imp. E/W St: SE 3 Street N/S St: SE 2 Avenue SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R 1 L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol 0 1 2 T R 367 457 11.0 11.0 150 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 TR 1501 1769 11.0 1130 Duration 1.00 Area Type: CBD or Similar Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left NB Left Thru P Thru Right P Right Peds Peds WB Left SB Left Thru Thru P Right Right P Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Q Green 25.0 67.0 =r sz v Yellow 4.0 4.0 Q) U All Red 0.0 0.0 a t Cycle Length: 100.0 secs LU Intersection Performance Summary o Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/c Delay LOS Delay LOS ;l).R - -a Eastbound PT o T 409 1637 0.95 0.250 91.6 F 71.5 E R 431 1725 0.76 0.250 47.5 D Westbound Northbound U. W Southbound TR 2231 3330 1.02 0.670 67.4 E 67.4 E Intersection Delay = 68.4 (sec/veh)• Intersection LOS = E 0 0 HCS-Signals 3.1c File:Se4st2ay.hcs Page 1 HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.1c Inter: SE 4 Street and SE 2 Avenue City/St: Miami, FL Analyst: DPA Proj #: 00124 Date: 07/13/00 Period: PM Peak Hour w/project (imp) E/W St: SE 4 Street N/S St: SE 2 Avenue SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes 2 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 LGConfig R L T Volume 1602 324 1473 Lane Width 11.0 11.0 11.0 RTOR Vol 0 Duration 1.00 Area Type: CBD or Similar Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left NB Left Thru Thru Right Right P Peds Peds WB Left SE Left P Thru Thru P P Right Right Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right -a c Green 78.0 12.0 o Yellow 4.0 4.0 U All Red 1.0 1.0 0 0LL Cycle Length: 100.0 secs U Intersection Performance Summary = Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS.�� a Eastbound Westbound Northbound R 1719 2204 1.02 Southbound L 351 2925 1.01 T 4203 4424 0.39 Intersection Delay = 53.3 81.4 F �d 0.780 81.4 F 0.120 154.4 F 0.950 0.5 A 28.2 C (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = D ONE MIAMI Biscayne Boulevard & SE 41h Street Site Utiofifty'Stu'dy U C CTE Project No. 00-0710 O �= U 0 ,:- U Prepared by: - CO Consul -Tech Engineering, Inc. - 10570 N.W. 27th Street, Suite 101 Miami, Florida 33172 SEPTEMBER 2000 ' 0 c� • • 1. DRAINAGE 1 2. Drainage Area Details The proposed site is located at the intersection of Biscayne Boulevard and SE 4th Street in the City of Miami bordered on the east side by Biscayne Bay and on the south side by the Miami River. The site, consisting of 3.04 acres, is currently vacant except for a waterfront concrete sidewalk and existing utilities. Currently, there is a looped drainage system running along the perimeter of the site that was constructed by the developer of an adjacent hotel tower. The existing system is inside a 25-foot utility easement and is to be shared. by both property owners. The proposed project .consists of a 34-story office tower, a 46- and a 49-story residential building and a 12-story parking garage. Development will produce a site which is approximately 100% impervious. Landscape planters and green areas are provided, but these areas are minimal and will be disregarded for calculation purposes. Storm water discharge will consist of runoff from rooftops, roadwaysQu vertical building faces and pedestrian areas: Miami -Dade DERM requires that the U proposed drainage system take into account 30% of the largest vertical building fact .Q �ECL - U The building faces exposed to the south will produce the largest amounts of runoff and will be accounted for in the calculations. The site land use can be summarized C: follows: 2D •c E Total Net Impervious Vertical Total Lot Area Area Building Faces Drainage Area Acres Acres (30%) Acres Acres 3.04 3.04 1.89 4.93 Proposed Drainage System The proposed drainage plan calls for all pavement runoff to be collected in catch 1 basins capable of detaining the peak inflow from the Miami -Dade County DERM 5- year, 24-hour design storm- for `90 seconds. These basins also contain baffles to prevent all oil, grease and foreign matter from flowing into the.proposed system. The runoff will then flow into four proposed drainage wells based on calculations found in Table 1. Runoff from building rooftops and vertical faces are uncontaminated by oil and grease and may piped directly to the drainage wells. The use of drainage wells are permitted by Dade County DERM in this .area due to the high level of salinity found in :the groundwater. The proposed -drainage wells will be interconnected to an existing drainage well system built inside the 25-foot utility easement found on -site. This existing system was designed for an off -site hotel tower and is comprised of three deep injection wells with runoff being piped to them by 12- inch reinforced concrete pipes. The proposed wells will be cut into the existing system and an emergency outfall to Biscayne Bay will provide an. added measure of safety. Since the proposed system is using a combination of wells and an outfall to dispose of excess runoff, the system will be designed to treat the first inch of runoff generated before disposing of any runoff.. The proposed wells and outfall will keep the site dry during the DERM 5 year - 24 hour storm, keep the flooding below the site perimeter elevation during the SFWMD 25 ,year = 72 hour storm, and keep the flooding below the minimum building finished floor elevation during the SFWMD 100 year - 72 hour storm. Biscayne Boulevard is a Florida Department of Transportation right-of-way, State Road Number 5. According to Department rules, additional calculations must be performed to prove to the Department that there will be, no discharge into the State right-of-way. The drainage well system will be designed to;.retain the maximum storm stage of the 100-year, 1-, 27, 4-, 8-, 24-, 72-, 168- and 240-hour storm events. II. WATER DISTRIBUTION MASTER PLAN The Miami=Dade Water and Sewer Department (MD-WASD) provides the water service in this area. The site will is served by a 24-inch ductile iron water main located within the SE Submitted into the public record in connection with item ,L%,C on a. Walter Foernan City Clerk 2 4th Street and Biscayne Boulevard rights -of -way and by a .12-inch ductile iron water main terminating inside the 25' utility easement in the northeastern portion of the site. Refer to the attached Water Atlas for additional information. The Miami -Dade Water and Sewer Department (MD-WASD) is requiring the interconnection of the existing 12- and 24-inch 'water mains by way of a new 12-inch ductile iron water main within the 25' utility easement. Domestic water services and fire line connections for this project will be_provided from the new 12-inch water main. Two fire hydrants are also to be installed on the proposed water main. -The-anticipated average daily water consumption for the'entire project is 155, 703 gpd, and is calculated as shown in Table 2. III. SANITARY SEWER MASTER PLAN The Miami -Dade Water and Sewer Department (MD-WASD) provides the sanitary sewer service in this area. The site is served by a 10-inch sewer main located within the SE 4th Street and Biscayne Boulevard rights -of -way and a 12-inch sewer main located inside the 25' utility easement in the northeastern portion of the site. Refer to the attached Sewer Atlas for additional information. The existing sewer lines have sufficient invert elevation and capacity to collect the sewage flow from this project. An 8" sewer extension is proposed connecting the 30 story office tower to the existing manhole on the comer of SE 4th Street and Biscayne Boulevard. This sewer line will extend into the project and will require 2 new manholes. The apartment buildings and garage will connect to an existing manhole in the northeast portion of the site with a new lateral. This project is anticipated to generate an average daily sewage flow of 155, 703 gpd, and is calculated as shown in Table 2. The wastewater produced'by the site will travel via the existing sanitary sewer system to the MD-WASD regional Pump Station No. 1. Pump station No. 1 is a very large pump station currently operating 7.34 hours per day. The additional 155, 703 gpd will only increase the Submitted into the public record in connection with 3 item on rc Walter Foernan City Clerk 00-1_1137 elapsed time by 0.02 hours to 7.36 hours;per day. Thus, the pump station is deemed capable of handling the proposed flow from the project. Pump Station .No. 1 transmits all flow directly to -the MD-WASD treatment plant on Virginia Key for final treatment before discharge into the.Atlaritic Ocean. Refer to the attached Miami -Dade DERM projections for more information SOLID;WASTE-GENERATION Solid .waste generated will be placed in standardized on -site. containers for refuse and recyclables:per the City of Miami -Code, for regular pickup by private hauling companies and/or the City of Miami Solid Waste Department. The solid waste will then be transported to Metro-Dade=s Disposal Facilities. Actual waste pick-up.locations will be shown in the architectural plans. This project is anticipated to generate an average daily solid waste,volume of 73.76 Cu. Yd/day, and is calculated as shown in Table-3. Generation rates were determined from data provided by the Metro -Dade County Department of Solid Waste. Submitted into the public record in connection with item J Lon rc Walter Foeman City Clerk 4 ®-1037 • TABLE 1 ONE MIAMI DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS 1. Total Gross Lot Area = 3.04 Acres Total Drainage Area = 4.93 Acres 1. Impervious = 100% or 4.93 Acres 2. Pervious = 0% or 0.00 Acres 2. Average Runoff Coefficient = 0.98 3. SFWMD Design Storm Information 1. 5-Year 24-Hour Storm (Miami -Dade County W.C. 1.1) Rainfall Intensity = 6.17 inches per hour Purpose = Flood Protection Peak Runoff = CIA=(0.98)(6.17)(4.93) = 29.81 cfs 2. SFWMD 25 Year - 72 Hour Storm (SFWMD Distribution, Figure C-I-6) Rainfall Intensity = 6.984 inches per hour Purpose. = Perimeter Berm Peak Runoff = CIA=(0.98)(6.984)(4.93) = 33.74 cfs 3. SFWMD 100 Year - 72 Hour Storm (SFWMD Distribution, Figure C-I-7) 24 Hour Rainfall = 7.436 inches per hour Purpose = Finished Floor Elevation Peak Runoff = CIA=(0.98)(7.436)(4.93) = 35.93 cfs 4. FDOT Design Storm Information Storm Duration Rainfall Amount (Inches) 1 Hour 5.1 (Figures 5-1 & 5-11) 2 Hour 6.3 (Figures 5-1 & 5-11) 4 Hour 7.8 (Figures 5-1 & 5-11) 8 Hour 9.6 (Figures 5-1 & 5-11) 24 Hour 14.0 (Figure 5-13) 72 Hour 19.0 (Figures 5-14 & 5-15) 168 Hour 20.0 (Figure 5-16) 240 Hour 23.0 (Figure 5-17) Submitted into the public record in connection with item _Q2_,�- on n. Walter Foeman City Clerk G J • 0 4. Well Data 1. Well Diameter = 24 Inches 2.. Assumed Well Capacity = 1000 gpm/ft. of Available Head 3. Mean High Tide Elevation =1.52 ft. (taken from W.C. 20,034-A) 4. Specific Gravity Head Loss = 2.00' 5. Proposed Number of Wells = 4 5. Hydraulic Grade Line Elevations at Well Structure 1., 5 Year DERM Storm = {(29.81 cfs)/[(1000 gpm/ft head)(0.002228 cfs/gpm)(4 wells)] }+ (1.52 + 2.00) = 6.86' NGVD 2. SFWMD 25 Year - 72 Hour Storm = (33.74)[(1000 gpm)(0.002228 cfs/gpm)(4 wells)] + (1.52 + 2.00) = 7.31' NGVD 3. SFWMD 100 Year - 72 Hour Storm = (35.93 cfs)[(1000 gpm)(0.002228 cfs/gpm)(4 wells)] + (1.52 + 2.00) = 7.55' NGVD Submitted into the public record in connection with item 12 ,, on rc, Walter Foeman City Clerk n Q®-11137 TABLE 2 ONE MIAMI ANTICIPATED AVERAGE -DAILY PLOW OF WATER AND WASTEWATER Residential Tower 425 units @ 200 gpd/unit Office Tower & Building 707, 025 sf of office space @ 10 gpd/100 sf Total ANTICIPATED AVERAGE DAILY FLOW WASTEWATER Average Flow 0.1557 mgd Peak Flow = 0.5839 mgd NOTES: 70, 703 gpd =155, 703 2pd 1. Peak flow uses a factor of 3.75 times average flow (Recommended Standards for Wastewater Facilities, 1990 Edition) 2. gpd = gallons per day 3. No industrial wastewater is anticipated to be generated 4. mgd = million galls per day Submitted into the public record in connection with item 11=<- on Walter Foeman City Cleric VA TABLE 3 ONE MIAMI SOLID WASTE GENERATION Residential Tower 425 units @ 8 lbs per unit/day. 3,400 lbs/day Office Tower & Building 701, 025 sf office building @ 2.5 lbs per 100 sf/day = 17, 6761bs/day Total= 21, 076 lbs/day Total= 10.54 tons/day Total anticipated Solid Waste generated: 7 cu. yds./ton x 10.54 tons/day = 73.76 Cu. Yds./day Submitted into the public record in connection with 8 item on Walter Foeman City Clerk Q ®13 7 j4. 9219 IIB N 44 i 328 S.E. 330 W� 9219 � 39 SE. 8M �.. 30 3-2 9 9219 8 34 N 9219 \I7 F14D M1AMl 5 3 3) ex Submitted into the public record in connection with item on Z L MD-WASD WATER ATLAS waiterr Ftvoeman 92I9 W : 327 y 9219 7 > N a I T 9 2 9 2 1' 7878 1 S T. /J I 288 288 N ,N 9239 1 I rh N c 2I9 1 266 ` 1461 9219 2 7 S T. 40 /2 t 8" 3I 800'" 2d 7783 329 9219 9409 151 6 N 12 I I.12 73167 � 1048 cv 1 ' S. 3 S T. 8 7367 � 1 7367 1048 3 1 g219� 2 = 7367 1048 2 2 ' 81SCAYN BLVD. I WAY 1039 Zss- .. ram- S.E. 4n36 ST RIV EK 1pyV98163 i Y 1 .9589 BR/CkBLL 1 Pq Rk J 3 ( 4174 �I I 1286 \ I � 95a5 ti � �N lubmitted into the public record in connection with item on 1zl&--kk� UValter Foeman MD-WASD SEWER ATLAS City Clerk ,c. .,, J 28'2 v 2902 N S.E. 1 12" S T. "23 10^ �33 53 l� _ 2 2 421 422 999 10F 5987 4_q 2FA 2806 518 446 �518; 2922 2953 4 2923� rn 98 Ci�bFIN PLAZA ' S2 ` Z 4 4 Ia7 27a 112� I„ 27 2 ST• �5_EI`I,SLUDGE Ll�i:5_—.-- 1 IE 47 77 436 39 4'1�Is�rI21I 2`11'2fi, �t 3 12C/- �- T27� 437 \ \450. 27G 3 I43_ 2924 5a34 8 I87 t.347f1 447 13Ul)64L 449 0 48 D 10 Q. r / C[ E29U 2..a_1 -� 2809 3CO2 300 N N S E 4 452 S T i" 458 LU 450 S.E. 10' 453 15 :?�.0 2810 C_ MIAMI ° R IER/ -77 F 3024 g S r 9 70\ , �+ C 3v51) 5' ,;; v 17- Q ?� i I f ��- 1 I -e r 2818 7. t 8 �9 525'� \ 1\r l / / .t CO #6(3 08- 1? - 00 FkI O&: 0? FAy_305 --- �- 6550 _. DER?! vKkSTEIi'ATER �p0, *20C0G8:.108572821*R3D'.FU x 17•:1io.s not a n o*f_ciai ccc_:cr. Scat Sr -a! --ion Statio_i Current Delta Projecced '^- _ e Owner Nurrbe:.- ET (1rs) ET ;?srs ET (F:_ s ) :o--pose3 Number c_ gallons t.gp ): 139000 ix.x� * cxet**t kra* rat,. y xt*icx** JOt4T.S�i�aT. .S-:.atior.S OR A.52M� 30 0001 7.34 0.03 7. o 30 CD 10C:i.63 0.33 1G0'_.85 AC 30 RS 1002.05 0.01 1002.0E IN 3C S95APR 1001.777 0.01 i00i."b =N 3C RS94�!PLR 1001.9= 0.01 1001.9% ONE MIAMI EXECUTIVE SUMMARY )ubmiled into the public record in connection with item J on rc Walter Foeman City Clerk. 00 - r 0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This document represents an economic and tax -benefits analysis of the impact created by One Miami. This analysis encompasses the entire Project and estimates the economic and tax benefits for both its developmental and operational phases. Submi,ted into the public record in connection with One Miami Economic Impact Study Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. Walter Foeman August 21, 2000 City Clerk 00 _ 1-1 3 7 SUMMARY OF BENEFITS The Project will bring significant economic benefits to the City of Miami. This section summarizes the impact of the Project on employment, public section revenue and other economic benefits as a result of the development. Employment Employment considerations include the direct employment resulting from the Project and employment created in the surrounding community through resident's and visitor's spending. Average developmental construction phase employment will be approximately 425 employees, and the Project's management is expected to employ 30 people for on -going maintenance and operations. Developmental Phase Wages Operational, Phase Wages Tax Revenue $ 48,140,000 $ 1,000, 000 The estimate of the public sector revenues associated with the development includes taxes and other revenues generated directly by the Project. Although public sector costs are important elements in measuring fiscal impact, these benefits have not been quantified in this document. This analysis only measures the benefits derived from the development. Annual tax revenue expected to be created totals $5,407,154. Summary of Economic Impact The estimate of total economic impact is measured by total output, and wages. This analysis measures the economic impact of developmental costs and ongoing operational expenditures. To determine the effect of respending within the City, we utilized a multiplier to compute total direct and indirect benefits. Total economic impact expected to be generated, as a result of the developmental and operational phases of the Project will approximate the following: One time Annual $364,939,313 $ 3,758,400 Submitted into the public record in connection with One Miami Economic Impact Study Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. Walter Foeman August 21, 2000 City Clerk Q®e1-3r? SUMMARY OF BENEFITS Significant Community Benefits: Jobs • Wages • Taxes • Economic Activity • Vehicular and Pedestrian Safety Enhancements The following table and chart summarize the economic impact of the One Miami development: CONSTRUCTION PERIOD ANNUAL IMPACT RECURRING Economic Activity Output $ 274,474,625 $ 1,879,200 Wages 90,464,688 1,879,200 Taxes 5,407,154 Total Jobs Created One Miami Economic Impact Study Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. . $ 364,939,313 425 $ 9,165,554 30 Submitted into the public record in connection with item �7_ ap , 1I Z 6._, Walter Foeman August 21, 2000 City Cler - 0 ®- 1 137 LgIT-®0 vL alo 40 UPWaOJ aallem U0 Ulajl UIim U, aauuo3 Uo pJ039a 0ilgnd 041 Ojui peu!wgn S r L� mIm lYa m ®agLr �n+n 31TIdIVf t1aY a jo t igam alls� Tv Q�B�W 3a lun TIrI15 L111Hs HXL C3Aa353S SIMON T1V vN ni01s (L) OLL 3o stiala6 ,Nwom au rAS8d-ODOZ 0 '300D WVaISIN" VOM"M 3HI 30 9-00t9 31na AS MWnD3V SI 371ION SIHL I(UO 3N1 01 03HOyilY SS3 NnnJOG LTIdAOS90O "S3LLWd A1W�30ISNOO 3H1 30 1N3SN0]MN3llR1M 3HI inOHLW o3MINO d 3aY S3UWd b0 AIWd `JNIN,MS 3H1 NVHl 3HIo AS SIHDd3H ONV SdVN A3A8n]LLON 5 Ol SNgL3130 HO SNOWOCY 3fidd\now oN 80AWnS MSN3]n Vaimou V s0 TY35 035OM 1V13t330 CW 3br11VNDIS 3H1 InOHIM "A 1014 7 VOWOld.sO 31YGS 90" 'ON HOA3MnS CNY1 113CMOMS33Qad SId TFWA J N NOLLVDHONUIY !0 , SDWVD YORIOU NOLLVIdOd= V0930U V 'r 3000 3AUYdLSMIn0Y VOWOU 3ML JO 9-1 L919 31118 OW S31(UVIS VOla0U 'L20'W1 31dVH3 01 L3MISdnd .VOWOU s0 31VIS 3NL M ONL3AWIS W.. aNY1 dos SaHVGWiS XNH331 KnNINIn. 3HI SO SHOLSAOad TaV3nddV 3HL s0 IN31NI 3ML S133M A3Ab1S arvS IVML '3N WU CW nITIB OW 37031MONM SH s0 IS39 3HL Ol 103H800 ONY 31181 S OIN NOISNC3dnS SIM 83oNn a3nuO3U3d SYM N08,190Ml oNLLln538 LBodis OWM dA3N1f15 3HL ow .AWnS ]IHdVSOOdO1 oW AWaNI108 OW 'A3ASnS 37ULL ONYI nSoV/VITY Sill IVHI S31JUM OSIV 03NOIS30Nn 31,11 (Z0 "Sl3Nin5 3Un GNYI VlSoV/YIW NOs S31NW!,In )0 OIM IOHINOO HDIHM SLN3n3snSV3n A3ndnS SO.4 SLN3YMgn038 3Unsolo QW 3DWLSiG 'TDNY nnmun. 3HL Ol 3lSVdVdnO3 slin538 3S3H1 WDCV Ol I130N0 NI U3.WWn3 33M 13NN053d A3 nS 31Vf103QV OW NOUVI3nr181SM 'S3Uno3]OUd G13U 3dOHd 1VH1 S3UL 3O 3H1Nnl o3NO1530Nn ?Nl '(AYWnS 013U 30 31Va 3ML .0 SY 1D31D NI OW n5ov ow V1TV A8 o1wo0v sV) SONVaNYIS A7Ybn3DY 3HL Ol 1Nvnstind '303S3H1 ZI GW 811 Vit Ot '9 (A1NO SNOLLVA-M IOdS) S 's 'C ', '1 Sn311 s0 SoW V S30n1]NI OW 6661 8380130 NI (SdSN) S ,.. AW(ls 71N01sS3304d 30 AI3= mmoLLVN 391 aW (MS7V) ONWdYn 9 DNILvuns NO SS3a0NO3 NY3QGm '(V1lV) NOLLV00SSV 311LL ONVI NYOW AY 3HL M MIdOOV OW 03HSn8YIS3 AUNIOr : sAamns 3UU ONVI nsof/V1W, ao3 SIN3n3i9nD38 1tt13a ObYOWIS nnnININ. 3HL HUM 3DNVOSOD3V NI (1) 30M 383M Q3SV8 11 HJIHM NOdn A?A8M O73U 3HL OW Idod3a OW ovn A3ASnS SIMI 1V111 AU33 3H1,H(li 01 SISIMI (It) 36 AVM 3SVO 3HL SV 'IWd38 S,WkWnS 3HL Ni 03Uo HO/oW dVn A3N1nS 3HL NO O317d30 SY 1N31x3 3N1 Ol a3SS31IO& 338 SYN Z NOUD3S '8 31rIONOS ONS NI NOL1d30X3 HDV3 1VHI s3ULL3D 03NO1583GNn 3HI 'NOUVMnYK3 SML NO G3SVS 's033H1 Z NOLL03S '8 31W340S Ol SNOUd3ox3 a3CWDM 3HL 30 S31dM GW 0000C10'Of80I H38YUN 31U 3DWO 3ONn OOOZ '6 H31i' o31V0 AWdn00 3DNYNfISN1 3ULL OOVDIHo AS 03nSSl 30NYSnSNI III dOJ 13INURAW 3HL 40 AdO3 V 03NnYX3 OW TNiD3N SM 8n3O -"31 311 ( (6) '3NnoU o3solo ATIYJLLY3ILLM V SN803 )JWdO8d 133rBrLS 3HL 30 NOUd187530 1v031 3N1 (6 'dYn A3ABn5 3HL NO NMOHS ATln3 3SOn 3W HOIHM s0 3arLLVN ow Nouml 3HL 'SI33UlS Jnand a31d3Mv OW o31VDIo30 Alno n03 ow Ol SS33oV SVH AU33doad G391Ho53a 3N1 (9) '6Z61 s0 nniva 1YJ1183A 3MGo3o WNoUM 3HL 01 03o3N3d3H SV SV .1333 0'CI+ OW 133s 0'ZI+ N0UVA3'13 aMU 3SV8 :3A. 3NOZ OOOU WA NNsTN3 u3doad MgmS30 3HL IWl S31VDIGNI '9661 'LI AW 30 31VO 3ALLD3ss3 V H1LM r-1010-'OS9aZL 3BI\nN l3Wd AUNnNNM 3ONn AoN3DV LN3rGVVNVn A3N3Da3N3 7VH3033 S31v15 o39Nn 3HL A9 a3NsMnd dYn 31VII AI�NOOO1�H��� SY 1d33X3 'A13dOHd a38W3S3O 3ML NO 031Y11115 SIN3n3AOHdA1 3181SLA 3HL0 b0 soh'IaIIns a0 SkTi V 5133U15 AS A13dOHd 0381a]MO alvS NO SiN31H7V0a]3 312LS A 110 'STNM AIWd ON 3W 33H1 (S) "dM A3AbnS 3ML NO NWHS 1VH1 N3H10 'SINWEV48dnl JO SNaLLVDIaNI 3l81SIA ONVS3dniDnW 'SoNM no o1VS s0 AW AS 5133WS I10 SMINU08d ONLLUIW NO 3Sn s0 SNOUV=41 318151A ON 3W 33ML (0 'dM A3WnS 3HL NO NMOHS 3SORL WHI 3HIO VIVS S0 NOLL33dSNI -w-%SANd lfU3Wo V 1103 DHldY3ddV AL3dUd 3ML oNU03s1V S3sn 80 S13n3SV3 3181SIA ON 3W 33H1 (f) '3ws 3HL 38 Ol b'Y3ddV NOISS3SSOd -WTU3V s0 S3Nn 3HL OW S3Nn 3UM LL 3HL 'dA3A8nS 3H1 NO NMOHS 38 AM SV 1d37X3 W '38 AM 3SY3 3HL SV 'Isod-d s'swaNBn5 3MI NI o310 31 HO/OW dM A3AHAS 3HI NO 03101d30 1NX3 3HL 01 A1360Ud 1J3rBnW AW S 3ML NO SS311M 3MIO TN OW 103r8nS 3HL NO S3r13A0ddM 30\'3N(15 31915N 3H10 OW S38nLondtS s0 3du QW NOlIV301 3HL 30 SNOIIYJIONI 33VSHnS T81SIA TW 'Almdosd 133rBIIS 3HL s0 V3W 3ML SMOHS A1038doo aW o00Z 'ZZ N, NO GNnodD 3HL NO 3GM SYM 13AUns TM0180 3HL (0 4VHL S31IWd 03NOUdV3 3A08Y 3HL Ol AAW3o A8383M 00 'a1VS380W 3LVIS OW AWnO3 3M1 NI SS3NtSn8 ON" ATM31 NOLLYSOdIJ00 vaWOl3 Y 'rAs9d s0 NNU 3HL 30 S3301136 DNIH33NION3-DNLUMnS s0 80173a10 3HI SV AUOVdV] An NI QNV WINOU s0 31VIS 3ML ao3 OW NI 80A3AHrIS CMVi IVNOISS3i0Ud a33LSiD3U V 'Sld '3TTYA l30 'n SOIWD 'I AW-III-SUNHOUY 'Yd 'JRDWNI 'Oa381I33ND AW61100 3amunSM 31LL OWJIHO dMSDN1HVd'M83N3D VOWOU Y WWGU .0 dt1(Wo 031V13U 3ML 'ZIA 'S3LLWd DNLLAOTO3 3HL Ol 03ULL33 A833H 3W IbOd3i1 OW dM AWnS 3HL ON'Y :A3ANnS OHd"Wdol ONV' AWONnO8 OW kwns 3ULL Owl NSOV/V1TY a3SV3a. SIMI ( 3W0 IrMn 30 u4nCD S"S ( vGIMOU 30 31v15 3H1 -31V06AWG0 S.HOA Mns IIx 3 utiuv 3Nn XV3 L166-0"-SOC 0066-091-SOC flZf-SV/CC VGI='IKM AVM WHOO 9Z9Z 31IA1S 3SnOH1N3d ,0NSMNUNd 1VMTO VOW" V VOWOU 30 dnoW OXYGH 3HL :so 3]N315ISM 3HL 1V 03Wd38d 3b3M'n033V3AL DMI1nS3U 1a0d3N ONY dVn A3ASnS 3/11 OW A3Aan5 7HdY8OOd01 OW AWONn08 •A3Abf15 31JLL ONY1 NS]Y/VI-W SIMI :Nou wHo:1A 1N3n0 Ix 3131111v 'Awns 0Z313 30 3HLO Ol SY 30YM UY SSNOILVLN3S3 d3L ON W AINO 535odandd Tn30LLYYINOONI HHOJ o a031N3S33ad St VIVO SIMI "3mS NO NoLLV1n8Y1 0W dM AWnS 3ML NO G.3 OWO 3bV 53381 OIYS s0 NoLLYJOI 3HL 'ua3doud 103ranS 3W NO (VIIUIDnN S0000) S33111 "Wd 1nNO3M 3W 343W $3Hii1v� 3dv0S4Nv1 x 313tLuv 'ATNO S3SOdand JvNOLLY1TdOSNI 603 WACHS 3W OW IN3n0 3H1 Nos 13SNnOO IVD31 30 LUNN 3ML ao3 dM A3AtlnS 3HL NO WNN13b 33M SNOLLd3JX3 031101d 3S3ML '30NadnSNt 3U1 b3 Os L1WnnO7 3ML M NMCHS 10 N 3a3M 1VH1 dM AIWIS 3HL NO 031]id30 3W IVHI GUM38 30 SNOLLd3DX3 N3H10 3W 30M :)ION 035S3a00V 10. 'ft 'dM A3AanS 3HI NO C330id3O SI OW A1M3dC d IJ3mnS 3ML SLD33W 19Z 30Vd IV 19L11 MC08 SOSO]38 WDWO NI 03080038 SY iN3MBUOV iW! "ZI '03SS380av ION "II '1H31X3 1S38 3HL 01 dYn A3A8nS 3MI NO Q31D13a 3W 1VHL SNOLLd37X3.U3M10 OW u3dOdd 1,]3MnS 3ML 1331N IVML SNOWGNM 13XNV18 SNn1N0o o9 30Yd 1V 051 MOOS IV1d NI o3CHM38 SY .Y T3OWd InYln 3NO. s0 01d OMAlaoHn 3ML 'OL 'dvn A3AHns 3HL NO GMOW30 SI OW AIH3dO8d L.D3renS 341 S0313V 660' 3VId IV ♦6491 MM8 Saa0O3a Tal0Us0 HI MU0038 SY I3nHDYW3 Nos L33SV3 3NSn1DX3-NON 3HL '6 'do" A3AanS 3HL NO a3WIC30 St OW Alb'3d0Ud L03rBnS 3ML SL]i33V 99VC 37Vd IV 6194L MM8 SONOD3N 1b0U30 NI 030So738 S' 13N3SV3 unity 1N3Wn3d 30 1NYND 3HL '9 ("I3iX3 LS3S 01 (131101d) 'A1H3dOHd 303r9115 3HI I331.fr 1VHi SNOUIONOO 13NNYIB SMVINM C96 3OVd 1V 999f1 MOOS SON0038 T OWO NI 030a0038 SV SNOUIU1538 30 SNOlYdV1030 ONY S1N3n3SV3 30 INYeYJ 3M1 "L "uH1 b3dO8d 103r8nS 3103IN 1VM1 SNOWONOa 13XNY19 SHI\'1NOO 996f 3DVd IV 6LOft BOOS SOH0038 1Vf3WO NI 03080038 SY NOUnlOS38 3HL "9 'f Itd\'aDYVVd 'II 313LL9V 33S '03ONndX3 'S '03SS31foaY ION 'f "Q3SS3dOQY ION Y '¢3553b00Y ION 3H3M Noad3]X3 SIMI 30 SNOUSOd 3N SLO T"8 INYd H03 lUOd3d OW dM kVNn5 S1L 01 vWS "Z '03SS36OW ION 'I '01383H1 S3SNOdS3b 3HL OW J3nLIRMM 3WL OM 30 Z HOUO3S-9 31rKMM 30 M3I3H S.BOA3MrIS 3M1 Ol 133d53b HIM SI NOLLYYWI ONIMOTI03 3M (-_u N nOO 3ULL 3Hl) 'A 31JLLW M 03890S30 ATIAI3 3Ion ONY 3WI tvIVJIH] 3H1 IB a3nS51 3oNVdnSM 3ULL NOJ INZI UNnM V JO W338 3H1 HUM a3QmNM SVM A3Mln5 91LL 'S3]tA1335 ALnLLn OW CH0038 s0 SNOUr)QU3H 3181SSOd Ol 103d53b HUM INOd34 SMl 30 (N 3-DUW) NOIIVOd SNOUVIMn 3ML Ol KWIJ 3SY31d 3]NIHMNI 3ULL a03 1N3NLIn"00 313L NI 80 Ob003d 30 1VId 'JNUl830Nn ':1 NO bV3dW AYH IV" 1VH1 3H10 SW3n3SV3 ANY 30 3J31SX3 3HL 01 SV 030VDUd SYM NOLLYrWOSN ON X131311av 'LHOd3b OW dM A3AWS SIMI M HLdOs 13S Sr SWaYllnn 3HL 01 W3rSnS 'SH311M 3S3H1 NI ONWdM OW ON"MnS Hoi 3bvo 30 CNYOWIS 31U DNISn Nous3n0 M S3WVaNn08 3HL 3LV7O1 Ol 3GYn SVM MM311Y AHW 3N33DOnr 7MOW330ad An Ni oW NOISVW3dnS 103UIO 1N 830Nn Wn8O383d 183M SNOIIVNIAW3 OW SIN3n38nSV3n 3S3H1 13AUnS 0311 30 3ALL 3N1 IV ALU3dO8d W3mn5 3NL NO 38n1YN I(V11NIS V 30 ;IMOV s0 SM803 U31I10 SO ONNOn HIW3 10 SNOU"OIA ON 383M 33H1 "dM A3A8nS 3HL NO o391N]S30 A-,ni 3bon SY 3SY S31UIlav3 3S3HL 30 dMSNO11Y13b OW NOILY301 '8310YNM] 3HL 'S31LI110YA 83N10 OW S3W1LLn MYL830 803 ld33K3 '1NYJVA SI u 3dCHd 133r8nS 3N1 aW-1V01M),Hd INSHVd WV IIIA 3131.111y "dM A3WS 3ML NO NMOHS A11113 3HOn SV 3W 'AlddY AM SV S13n3bnSY3n 031YIn3140 OW 1VId '(11313 N33M08 S3nivA 3ALLYWd.OD 3HL DNIOMOM 'S3RMNn09 3HL 01 09YD38 HILM NO3N3H1 039]UDS30 Sr S3LLM U3H10 11Y 'AIII3d08d 103r8(tS 3N1 UO3 VIVO MVdS IVJUas oW TYINOZWOM 30 LNWun5Y3n 3H1 9NLL-4d30 30 3SOdWW 3HL 80J 03Wd3Hd SYM n0333H1 5NLLVLS38 18:d38 OW dM A3AUnS 341 OW _A3NlnS DWYI:190d01 ONY AWONn08 OW A3Aa115 3ULL ONVI n57V/YIW. SIMI S3YJNa MNo0N1 kUVCM09 IIA 313t1W 'AINO S350dNnd TlNaLLMNO3M Nos 0313rv13H SVM vOWOU 'WNnoD Savo-o"N MON) ALNnO3 30YO 3IVH03 3H1 JO SO800311 OnBnd 3HL 30 91 30Vd IV fL M008 1YId M C38W0S30 ATni 3NOn oW AYB 3MAYJS19 DNOTY dM A3mnS 3HI NO 0311nn3a SV .3Nn OY3HM1nB AINAOD 30Y0. 3N1 'S31ALV1S YQISOU 'at 83ldMJ 01 1WnS80d :IOV ONWdVn IVISVO3. 3HL NNW 03NIDO SV AVG 3NAVJSIS OW d3AIH i"n 341 ONLL1nSY V3W 3HI 30 A3WS 3Nn N31VM Nom NV3N V 1M3SUd3b ION s3Oa A3mns SML 'SuniviS VOWOU 341 30 11 t - to 1'9SS b31dYN3 01 1Wnssnd :1DV AL33V5 CW NOILN3A31Jd 39YKVO ALnMJ (INnOWWWL 3HL HUM 3oNYndNO0 NI N3A19 Si 3OLLON SIMI "AIH3dOtld 1J3rSnS 3HL Ol 1370m No oNuinov 'NOdn 'MIND. ALMOV NoUnOn30 NO NOIVANWO 'NOU3nKLSNOD AW 30 3DWAaV NI SNnOH In, Ism 1V OLLf-ZCf -COS -t IV 031]ViNCO 38 LSnn 'aNl WitioU s0 TYD 3NO 31VI5 3MHSNnS 1VH1 N3NO A831,13H S 33UON "S37YlMi5 3dV=dVH N0s lOOs 00l/1 OW s3oV3an5 ONfIO80 IVI1fUVN Nos 1003 OI/L s0 AOVbnooY 1M01ltSOd NJLLN3A 031MUS3 W Ol 03Hnsv3n 33M dM aW A3AMn5 SIHI NO 031D4130 SY 53Bnlv31 a3ULM301-113M s0 SNOUVAT13 3HL 'WACHS 3SM413H10 SS3lNn '1M3 Ot/1 _so A7VdnD0Y MIOWSOd WINOZWOH 031MLLS3 NYM Ol 03bnSV3n 3H3M dA3MIIS 3HI NO 03L.]Id3a SY S39nLV33 03UILN301-T13M 'AMJObd 173ran5 3ML 01 vWYM 80 ONU1(ISV 'SS087V 'NOdn 'NIHW anoo0 AYn 1YH1 3LSYM OnOS 80 GinOn SnOoWZVH AS NOLLMIRVIN00 31SISSOd 80 SNOWONOO IVJ1O0l03HJW/wO DOl03D SY3a'V NI-aTnU •SGNY113M 30 NOIIMIN83130 3Hi 30n1]NI AM SNOWONO] 3S3H1 kmn5 SIHI 30 M3Mnd 3HL 3CISlnO S7N3 SNL SY '03Mn3130 ION 383M SNOWONO] 110S 3003 3ALLYNLSINIMOV VOWOU 3NL 30 9-0019 31nN Ol IWnSHnd .VOINOU 30 31Y1S 3H1 M DNt,3ANnS ONYI Is M 'un obd 1J31'Bns H A 35VJ 3HL SV O 56LL "38 In 3]d NINI Nl AS 03b 03a S H Nn 3 W � IYJIN 03l n. SONVO S 3H! O1NI DN5I .40 Tr AVM d0 IHDIN 3HL NIHUM I IV 30 SPIVISLVlx3 36d3u ON 3HL a0 53mgs ONn08DH30Nn ONLLSIX3 3ML 30 TN 3518dn0J SN011YJOl 353H1 IYHI NOLLYL:3538d3tl ON 53NVn NOA3Aan5 3HL 'A .OI1W N, o381N]530 ATIn3 3HOn SdVH OWONO30Nn A10 3HL n03 03NN30 MOM OW 31VA ObddY 3W d" AWIIS 3HL NO 031]id3a SY AVM s0 IH!MH 3141 MINIM S3Un1In ONn08Da3ONn 3ML s0 NOIIY]Ol 3ML "dM A3AHnS 3I, NO NMOHS 351MU3M10 SS3lNn 031YO01 ION 343M u3dMd 103(Sn5 3HL DNLLLn1N 80 SSOUOY 'Node 'NIHUM JStX3 AM )3ML SY 53B Uon81S 30YsanS '031Y301 104 383M AIN3dOtld 103r8nS 3ML DNIL'n9Y SO SS080Y "NOdn 'MMIIM LSX3 AM A3M1 SV '08 NOISIA3131 Tog" '3oVLLUS 3NOHd313I 'SYD 'AI0181J313 '30YM3S '31VM31SYM 'a31M 30 TSOdS10 UO/GNV A3N13G 3HL Ol ANYiv]W S1V131M 3H10 OW S318YJ 'SGIOA 'S31u Nrvdo 'S3x09 'S.L,,WA 'S3NVA 'S3dId Ol NOlIviinn 1nOHUM ln8 'oNloni3m 'S3iinllln 37Y38ns8n5 'S3umn AS 03AS13S SI AI113d0Ud ID3r8nS 3ML MOH 01 SY 30YA SYM NOILVNIN313O 80 NOUVAYJIG ON 'VOIHOU •.UNnO0 3GVO-INYIn JO SGMO33S DrlBlld 3ML NI 031U N338 JON 3AVH 1VH1 3NVS Ol DWNIV10d(AW SI)S30WUVA s0 SoNM3a 803 Mb310 as 3HI 30 301330 3HL OW DMNOZ UW ONIGWO 'ONMNVId 30 IN3rlldvd3C 'IMnn 3o AUO 3HL 10V1NO0 01 03SIAGV 3W M luod3a ow dA31AHAS SIMI JO S3NOU338 '03SS3000V ION '3bO333H1 OW 03OV"d ION 3b3M IN3NUnn00 3ULL 3ML NI HLS03 13S ION 3W 1YHL 1SIX3 AM Sv SNOUal?nS38 ON, SNOWONM a3LY7311 3H10 OW S3Nn MOV91M '931WONn08 DNINOZ DNKWV038 NOUYmMOSNI Tn1WWaM 60 A LLN3 AW A8 A13dO8d I03rSnS 3H1 JO NOiiv lno7o 80 NOISS3SSOd SO dIMS3NMO 01 Sy HOLLVIN353Nd3N ON S3XM BOA3AUnS 3HL "W3ddV AM SNou71051bnr HURL SV S3WUI3 3LYAIHd OW OMnd 83HIO AW s0 SON003H 3Hi b0 'BYnn 30 AU7 3H1 'AINnoo 3OW-l/l\9n s0 SOHM3b 3n8nd 3W M GNn03 38 AM IVMI LHOd3H SIMI NIHLVA a3NIVINO0 SO dM N1 A3ns 3HL NO NMOHS ION 3W 1VH1 A/3d( Md 103rBnS 3HL NO SNOLL]153 IHa '"31 38 AM 33M1 1VHL 03SIMY A033H SI L3n3 3HL '03HSINNR3 33M VIVO 10 S33bnOS 3HL M 0310 S 1YIML NVHl 3MIo NOLLMNOSNI b3HIo ON 30NIS g4m vimn IA 319IJLUV ('SMaoM JnBnd JO I3n1Wd30 IYIV1n so ),w :xwno5) '1331 99Y5+ 30 NOUvA313 03dWiS V H11M 3NSYM SWUS OW I" Y 30 SISISNM NWnH033HL "1081N07 TVOU83A Wl 035n SYM XTYM 3083130] 3ML NI OWA31f108 3HAVOSW aW (AVM OWA31no88 3NAV]SIO) 13381S Hit '3S s0 3NNCO ISV3HlnOS 3HI 1V 031Y001 ASMHON3B lrmn 3O AID V '6Z6i s0 n(ava W3uN3A OLL30o30 'MIOUVN 3HL MOBS 1333 9Z'O SI nr1LVa SIMI'MnLYa WNLN3A Mn 30 1W3 3HL 01 83,138 NO3S3H a3101d30 SV SNMVA313 CO3bIn03a OS 31NOLLYNNOs`11 TVNOWWOV 803 OZ99-80-009-1 1V OWUWN '380NI17VB NI 3OU30 NVBOWd 3DNVBnSNI OMU TNOIIVN 3H1 17V1NOD Ol C3SAOV 3W 1dOd38 OW dM A3MnS SIMI 30 S3NM71938 '3WS NWA 0310,d30 ION 3W IYHL SeVN ONS NO 031V3Nn30 S3NOZ ohyzw a001s 3141 s0 S31WONnoo 'III 1]33JV 1Y.LL VY(,3 111W 3113 NO 13NGN3HY dIn s0 S8311-11 80 NOIS•!38 dM so S831131 30 AM 33N1 :NOLLVDUITvno) -.561 LL Alnr s0 31Y0 N01S1A3tl Y MUM r-IOt0-OS90Z1 N38nn13 13Wd AUNnnno] •SdYrl 31VN 30NMnSNi oMl3 (Writ) ADN39Y 1N3n30YNv11 A339S3M3 IV113O33 S31Y1S 031Mn 3HL n03 03AMOO SYM NOLLMaOSNI SNLL 'A13A11D3dS3b '1333 VCI+ OW 0"ZI+ SNOLLVA313 OOOIJ 3SVS :3A 3NOZ 000U NININ1 S3n A13dOdd SIHI VOINOU 'uNn00 30Y0 3n803 3N1 s0 SONOOM 3118nd 3HI 30 Ct 30Vd IV OZI MOOB. 1Y1d NI 03WO03S SY •3033H1 1Vld 3H3 OL OMOa030'Y .'dM VItl311U]-000U 30 1VId 0303M. 03ULLN3 SdVA 3HI NO 03101d30 SV 'SS31 80 3Wn '1333 0'6+ VIS3U83 OOOU AlNnoo 3C a-INVn HIMUM STY3 A.13dOUd SIMI "dM A3MnS 3ML NO C38WS30 Allns 38on aW 03143NnNOn-TLU OSMV Si OW ONCO38 40 JY1d ONv.1830Nn 3HI NO 03SY8 SI 3Nn SMt Y. 17AU OWS 30 3Nn 1S3M 3HL 9-40W 3.CC.0AOS so OWN38 V Ol 333U N033H NMOHS SV SDNkfV38 I"N 3TJILW 3AA »W Iwl unIIVN"suNn sU Nul3 - 3H1 803 a3Sn 33M 191-9C ow CL-W YC-9C YC-9C s83ohm 133H5 SOHOD38 O4n%IO83GNn INeIN 30 u13 NWV]UW3A 13MNOn All] UO3 a3sn 3113M 'AU W3dS38 NV-9C ONV fV-9f S38nnN 133HS SvrUV INYIN 30 110 9661 '61 838N3AON a35U38 LSY1 OW 966L 'L M380M O31Vo "7M 'NVDINM3f A HnHos 'ATM3n8 -ISOd Ili MW3dd .V UOWd WM 3NO 1YU 3NiVIKU OW A3AHnS ]MdYdOOH01 OW ABYONKS- C31ULM3 S133HS OWL NI dM XWnS V '9661 11 LSr0nV Ms V13H LSVI ONY L66L -O[ 38N3D30 CMVO ']NI 'S31 M5 'MY3l-HILHOJ XG 03Wd3ad ,AWnS AbYONno9 0tm0WJOd01 VZYid LNOd no. 03UI1N3 SIMMS OML M dVn A3AUn5 AUVUNnoS v ('1033N1 M3V38 3H1 30 3NIYWM 3131dn00 OW "Inns 3VOR V UOs XI 31OLLW Ol 333a 35V31d) '0133NL SNOad33X3 a3CH0]3N 3H1 30 S31dO3 NUM 3H13'Jol 000C10Of80t - N 313 37ds0 30NA AWdnM 30NVanSM 3ULL ooV.NHD A9 Q3nSSl SV OOOZ '6 Hod" 031YO 30NVH(ISNI nM NOS 13nU11NOO V l'o180U 'AIMICC 30VO-inVin 30 SOW*18 On8nd 3N1 30 09 35Yd 1V OSL X008 1Y1d M OOOZ .1 AXYnLIM 030SM38 SY '3033H1 lYld 3NL O1 ONIOH007V .V l3]Wd IMY!" 3HO. 10 IY d 030SO038 1W WWOU 'AMOO 3CV0 3Nd03 3HL 30 SONM30 DMrld 3HI !O It 371d IV DS MOOS lYld NI 916t 'LI isnOnv 03OVOOM Sr 's033H1 1V1d 3HL Ol ONMO30V .VZVId 1NOd no. s0 ivid QM4033u 3HL -NOU,dO17S0 "IVD31 arts O"WOT103 31ON 3HL 3d a3U10011 OW I3nUnnM 33ImnSNI 31U1 3HL nods NLLY883A N3WI SYM HOUdI80S30 WJ31 3ML :alva do S30wm A MUM VIVO 03WOS ONINfVI90 3W 033O&W 38 1SnN SIMI-NOLLOn0oH43H AB 31VJS NI C38311V 38 AM dYI1 A3mnS OWS lYLLL IOVs 3ML Ol OM33HO SiNOI1N311V 'dYn A3MAS 3ML 30 IMNS MOV3 NO O3i01d3G SV I113nstanSV3n s0 SUNn HSno3 NI S31voS 01HdYdO OW 031V1S 3N1 1V 03AV1dS10 38 Ol 03ON1IM S dVn A3MnS 3N1 '1NOdU SIM. s0 (IN 31 ]Wf'I) Nollaod S31ON3LSISN07M AbvONn08 3H3 Ol H31U •A3AHnS SIMI ao3 53a(10300bd OW SOOLL3n ONIOW03H NOLLVn803Nl 380n ao3 '1N3n3enO3N SIMI 033]x3 Ol OunO3 SYM S38ro' OIa13103D 03SO1] so NoaYIncavO OW U0n3NnSV3n AS 03NNI8O A0Vdnz1N 3HI 'L333 00001 M 1003 1 S A3AIins JO 3dA1 SIMI ao3 Aoyuna7Y 3awim 3NLVl3s NONINin 3HL .'MSIN HOIHIIVIJS3nn00. SI3000 3NIVIUSNINQY WWOU 3HL 30 9-LID19 31nN OI INVnSSnd .W[8013 s0 aIVIS 3HI M ONv3Aans aNV1 Nos SOUYOWLS TYDINHO31 nnnlNln. 3M1 NI G313ISSYI] SV 'ONVI 3HL 30 3Sn 03103dx3 3HI :A0aH=v Al 3131111v 'Ca0038 30 1Y1d ONu 3aNn 38UN3 3W SV Y3W 3nYS 3HL SH3AOO V. l.1VM1 orvS .Y. ioVaL 30n1]NI 01 03190on OW (A'0) 3JN"(ISNI 3ULL ,Os 13N11nN0] 3HL n03 nI1VBlf\S a3WM SVM NoudISDS30 7YO31 SIMI :310N VOIHOU-AlNn00 3a a-imm s0 S08003d DnSnd 3H1 30 'OB 3OY6 'SSI MOOS lY1d NI 0308003U '3033H1 IYld 3111 01 ONIOUO]JV .'V 130W6 I"" 3N0. 30 :YV. 17IUL 30 T1V WOURi0630 IVID31 III MUM ooOZ '9Z Alnr NO ";,* 3HL 80s l3SNnM 1VO31 18 030MObd SYM LN3nn815N1 OM "VG180U '(MNnOO 3OW-1w" MON) A1NnC0 30V0 s0 saum3s ]nand 3HL 30 SS6 3ovd 1V 989ft MOOS SGUM3H WWO M 030U003N SV :SNOLIOW1S38 s0 NW W1]30 ON, S1N3n3SV3 s0 1NVN0 U3130 INV6Y 30 NOLLMINU31. aTUL3 11Unna15N1 3HL Ol INvnsund ALld1L3 $11 NI 03iVMn83L SYM 11333W3 ONS '13nno0G SIMI M 03110 CNN a3ddVn ATSIIDA31ld SYM LYMa UN3N39Y3. 3HI) 4tZZ 3'T'd 1V Z011 l MOCS SaUO]38 7MWO M G3080]3U SY .SNOIL1WM"` s0 NCUvHY030 OW L3n3SV3 30 INYMO. 3HL 01 S3DN3N333U TV 30 NOUTM 3NL TnIVL3 NOIS"71 3HI '0002 Alnr s0 A.YO H3LZ SIM G31JU303a GNV 03SVJ8 A033M SI IHO)M OW A3NU1S 30 dM SIM 'dM A3A8nS 3HL NO all]1d30 SV SNOILV001 31AL IV 0391nOOV 33A1 Isd3doHd 133r8nS 3ML ONa1n8V S3DYd,.O ONXnn8 3HL 30 SIHD13H 3HL 'NOUJOOY NI -NCILYVi8Y1 33a1 3HL NO 0313Id3C SY SIHDQH 3381 OW 3L3NY10 MNOUL ONIGOIJNI SNNd InNo= TTY omuvadn ow Nouvaol38 3N1 10U38 Ol OOOZ 'Alnr s0 M791 SIMI 03StA3b A033H SI I.HOd3H OW A3ANnS s0 Nn SHl 'OOOZ 7Z HOaM NO SYM 3m5 HIM NCI103NNO3 M (.31v0 A3MnS. 3Hi) A3Aun5 (rT3U 30 Mb1314KOO 30 31YO 3HL 30N34333a AS s03b34 IWd V 30M OW 0133H 03M7VIIV dM A3AbnS 33S :A3AHf1S 0WV6'-XXJ01 ONV AHVC 109 d0 dM 113131181f 3M A nUinCO 13S-dd 3HL 01 3]N3H333b 3MM -,VMS 31VG 1VH1 01 1113no3SSAS (38 AM 3SVD 3,11 SV '1U0d3N NOOMOJ AB ;ZNLO Isw OU003M BC3 03113 SiKWDOO OW 3rM ALNnM SnOV38d 3H1 O1 8313a TMS 31YO IMI OI b01ad C80038 80J 031U SIN3nnD00 01 UDN383d3U TN 'ZLZ-L6 3GWN 3ONMIGdo 0. IINTISand S3NOt5S'Nn0] uNnM 30 OUYOS S11 AS a313100D OW L661 'CI d38n3AON NO SbOID313 S1I AS .A NnO0 30VO. now 03OWHO SVM 471HM 30 3nVN 3Hi WINO'U s0 31Y1S 3HL s0 NOISWOanS l'/JIIP.M Y '}1NO0] 3GYa-IlfYln. NY3n TOSS A1Nn00 W180U !0 31VIS 3HI 30 NOI1V80dM00 IYdIDiN1n V 'IPM" 30 All] 3H1 NY3n TI MS Vm 3033HL No"W]S30 3iMdn03 OW Tint 3UON V 803 3" SI H3IHM 01 30W3 W38 '1BOd3d SIM-' so ('.II 31]libV) MOUNOd NoUdbo530 T'D31 3HL NI 031VOlONI ONY1 1308vd 110 333W '101 IVHL TN NY3n TVHS :AI83doNd 173r9nS "3JN3a333U AS H1343H C31Y8Od8MNI OW s033M LW6 V 3GM '01383H GIMJV11V d- _13MnS ]IHdYdoodol OW Aln'ONn09. 3I s0 n803 3HI Ni A3AUns 3HL .0 N(Y43Id30 OIHdYHO 3HL NV3n 11YHS :dVh A-Wn5 VOWOU so dnONO 031Y138 3H1 Wan INMS :iN3n3 :A11VHaNM 'SNOLLWN30 131rf1. m VOI8013 1AINn03 3oVa-11WW `IWVIW 30 A113 aV 139HVd IWVIW 3NO. 30 A3A8ns 31HdVH90d010NV AUVONn08 aNv A3AHns 31111 aNVI Ws3V/V11V 18od3u smoAmuns 0331A38 9LU-989 . 19091 L09Z-ante Va180'Id 1VIVIVI WMAV 4410t WN t00L 6Z 81 I3817N NOLLY3 ORM d0 3LYOkWBJ Y09D'U I M (33HvdEud -VGIHOld `A1Nnoo 3aVa-IWVIW `IWVIW d0 A113 `1SV3 ZV 3ONVa `Hinos ti5 dINSNM01 `9 N01103S NI JNIAI `SOU033H A1NI103 30V®-IWVIW `09 3!JVd `Sa N009 1V1d _ r HMO ;- rr ra axv JWwa-mg1off \v J IN .00E - 4 31VOS dVW 1,1011V301 tJ n uuweoi 19111am _ 1 uO T®I Wail 411m uos}oauuoa u. �1oaa1 oilgnd ay} olu! pajj!WgnS • I 1MIlO 111 Oi OffJIOBI mM ]R\9N OM1 Z ICJ Z i33HS if96L t91L �VJ�W J. ,B. ,fB51D6 IfJ10 Ub L1DR IC) OLL O L{t>iBOD 1NRW0 iLL 1a31N1 - 'AM IOLLVA73 - -0 tZ BL a3Jw1S lNNMlON 3DN31fiM L3WWA9d - Wtrd HL%M OW - V 7 DW WULN3D - V . wmv - a 3kvno tlNlOd11D'i dD 1MDd - 33d '31ld lNDn 1.33a15 NOU335MM LN3DW1-NON A L.Dd - Lid Om 3OHNVf1 o3 OuLa n - -S3 3OtVIIS OWlo.3T3 - 4S] AzK3D Vl A 1MDd - Id ' 3kVUVAa[O 30 1NOd - Od NDS - OHIew - WTO (vsimnN L. ww) 3m NT•d Ifoo= - r4 3wwnaLS )oms i 313 moo - SW )ODB SMW311 WOU" - 'aa'D LWao1H 3bu - Yt WVd - 'd 3ATIA a'3LVM - w MW 1VLd - -B'd tam omrdva - LSW N' a313n a31VM - ISV3 - 3 310d LOn - d, Hl[OS - S 310HNYN SWM AWIMS - o KmN - N 31OHNVN 3MWW 1MolS - o 159.HLnoS - 'IVS Ms" HoIVO - HoLL735 - 'O3S DIM Baro - I: ISNOLLldV-%BSV bNgom IWO 6 .B'li .t .C'li .6'fl it 9F C .0'!L .L•9L •1 .I ft t[ Ic .f'fi �I'II •6 L[ t[ .f'SL .I'f1 •C •: Lf It :0, f'fl 62 .f'91 •! i L[f2 .l'9T •OI L Wol .t C2 .Z'f •9 s .0'Ll •6 IZ Z1 .B ZL .f'9 •L L a Noll Wine" Ravi -Jmu m am SLUU l ` � � . '. Tyr ���`' �S+•[St L13J GALS �,e• 0 ate• 211 ,�r e u. � + � r•-'___� N-82�_^ _Iv+Oylf'6C l__3az B JLUVd V 10N 6 (VMO-W urn` aara do ear arWW - % 3DVd •or NOW 1V-W N a3aWOOM .VZV,d 1NOd nao �. .0:10`dal � f.l AIXiE W f M BMI�n +M fiAwO® 1fY♦IIaOY O1 L4D AOV � ��I� {z A� � � / ■ ..j .c�Yl C r rF f i 4V 'OA— 3N V sm � •m1•s i .. tf-j�il�I z v C ail O ♦, . o co 6 g ..• m i Ir j Y J f�� O co ,,.e,�4a -� . _ �_ ,.., ,,•ice,, � ' � &I � � �� � �Aa� I �� .00,69 - V •05z[ i a—� .. WJ * at 9•''j6 _•• SMOV foc HOT 12 3bVM ZDCZf1 ONMINW ' ;Xise•' ANOIS L IBId a6nf I ' (V®kiald 112YK)J 3aV0-0YV6Y d0 80E10.?7H O(1&ld 9NAVOSI9 HMOS IOZ I +.. • I3BL sss6 v nm dkqlf1Oe Jfamll VLtiC Iwols 3DVd 05l JIaa91Vld N a30tlO mo ` rnwcwr3c = d I A �13J1 G.•np r1 _ ' 0 91YMmIlOIE I SO • < l3OHVd IWVIW 3NOa ?�".— oV Y • 1O V H 1 .a A'•°52�'.i A°, - 6 f289>I -e'a'o 83e I NOW 9MMI i I o ✓ I S.o.aeoo �w-, w. �,Y �'• .o GL BSaSN a 1-aN m'SZS iLZ-- - - J ----------------------- xcu-----': - -�-- - -- C tl)61Y ir.l )t1 0100! J b¢ m•i m w�Nia�ine see ��ols anon 00 � v W_I i ,o �I m Ir---I I c m Ind a; I` l O N €1 1 1i V d V > g I z l o I O �� Z r g 0 I It crae3o-d xurloo mVG mo sa6wm orum `' I m u� •OSd JIaO811VN'id NO I a o -4 0 �j '< I a[ ( .01 I z VZ113V�Vdl dna. m 'A. lOVHi -O NOLLUOd 1 O 1 N - I ,LTO ta0- V � I ,00-Dm • a v r p :.Or v ,ef.fz.lc - — [oo.wswx-of----------.00 - — 1 .Do-52 - a 3Hn IN3nrwon 'up xo V___ /�- toL.ac� --00,9Z.19 —11 V Z V 1 d NId0HO 9LtL-S84190Ei VZ V I' d NIdOHO toga-zate Valaow mV1" ao 00 3nN3AV viLOt WN WOL I-M M nVOS JIHdYdO O N ' VL 4l W98" NMVZUOKM do 3Lw.>LALUso rmfD'W n I oa oB aF s1 o !V i a < �' z -,As aMNAW `IWVIW '1SV3 'VG1HO1J 'A1NI100 3aVa-IWVIW d0 A110 ZV 3ONVa vml2 'H1t10S V9 dIHSNM01 '9 N011339 NI ONIA1 'S(Ib003a A1NnOO 3CIVa-IWVIW '08 30Vd '9% )1008 1V'Id V qlq-pw&(&. zo I m r- r- 04ROA .0 r MARAS KnazoLammm mumova.,f war. %V E • 4C_7f7e AZF.-7 7o MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT September 7th., 2000 Sheet Title DRAWING LIST A1.0 Night Perspective A1.1 Site Plan A1.2 Overall Ground Level Plan A1.3 Overall Mezzanine Level Plan A1.4 Overall Plan At Level 3 A1.5 Overall Plan At Level 4 A1.6 Overall Low Rise / Pk'g Levels 5th. to 7th. A1.6a Overall Low Rise / Pk'g Levels 8th. to 10th. A1.7 Overall Pool Level Plan A1.8 Overall Mid -Rise Levels Plan A1.9 Overall High -Rise Levels Plan A1.10 Overall South Elevation A1.11 Overall East Elevation A1.12 Overall Cross Section East-West A2.1 Office Ground Floor Plan - B1 A2.2 Office Mezanine Floor Plan - B2 A2.3 Office MEP / Support Floor Plan - B3 A2.4 Office Support At Level 4 - B4 A2.5 Office Low Rise Floor Plan At Pk'g Levels 5th. to 7th. A2.5a Office Low Rise Floor Plan At Pk'g Levels 8th. to 10th. A2.6 Office Low Rise Floor Plan A2.7 Office High Rise Floor Plan A2.8 Office Roof Plan A2.9 Office Building Elevations Submitted into the public record in connection with item lQ� on f V,- v0 Walter Foeman City Clerk C] 0 46 r 1 L.J A3.1 Residential / Pk'g Ground Floor Plan A3.2 Residential / Pk'g Second Level Floor Plan A3.3 Residential / Pk'g Third Level Floor Plan A3.4 Residential / Pk'g Floor Plan Levels 4th., 5th. & 6th. A3.5 Residential / Pk'g Floor Plan Levels 7th. To 13th. A3.6 Residential Pool Level Floor Plan A3.7 Residential Floor Plan Levels 15th. to 42nd. A3.8 Residential Floor Plan Level 43rd. A3.9 Residential Floor Plan Levels 44th. & 45th. A3.10 Residential Floor Plan Levels 46th. To 48th. A3.11 Residential Floor Plan Level 49th. A3.12 Residential South Elevation A3.13 Residential North Elevation A3.14 Residential East Elevation L-1.1 At Grade Landscape L-1.2 At Grade Landscape L-2 Pool Level Landscape L-3 Landscape Details D-1 Marginal Docking Facility - Plan & Section C-1 Preliminary Utility Plan • Submitted into the public record in connection � item on _► a-Lf�, Walter Foeman City Clerk, 00-1137 2 I I I I I OW 11 . IL { I I I11 1 1 111 1 f I'I I I ', lllli Y.� i l � j Il is I111 ,I. I I IIIl:�far - Ifl l.11tt I I1 1111111 41 I el L l 11Y.1.1.. a L l7 •p'O'�t• a � 1 i� ���'{• 6 I, - t= , �Ait1� -i it HIr rt` {•�„ I I it � •` , � /rN� �-solo err. eA _ L J d 'S fir.. ruse. ow I u 11 :' w— ILL ■ai,.:nuuunnu YZJ/ //a/lt/,1/I//l/, ==V :��ON■:ro:90 ramt'. II an: .j.� �►��. Ia0i 14,8111MA u NW, n 0s• KoO5 ail � 1010 Lam- _M Ei 06WEr W �1 T� �a WTI LZ Elm 0 1ME _ .me DICG LEVEL PLAN A 1 _ b P ■■ss/■■■■■■■■■■u■■■W- Is fir �ft �J : ti:L rr �kr Qi M,FRHATER 9RO11POFFLOR/DA MI CaW Wiy. AMIlaw 19—R MW Submitted into the public record in 'gonnection w'h Item f��� cn AR49 550 Bi#dAN; S/e 2W A/mK R JIM Phaw 3O5X2 M Fa 305372V5 Walter Foerrian City Clerk 0n--11.3If CURTIS-RO AS DE SIGN STUDIO INC ]Ri qWD AVENIIF lIIII! Y11 COOgIR Oro& R1Ilo\ nal n.rsr� = m no241 0 0 0 it MAP 0 25 50 100 100 ® E MEREMINY SR04YP WFLORMA SCALE IN FEEr Narn, 28M CaW Way. Pffdaw I lba R 3W ARQ 550 &nta(Ave, 5L* ZU AhRi R 3W mowX537282 F&x:30=U5 %-"LY %-llt:lK U R T IS SRO G E R 8 DESIGN STUDIO INC L -11 A11*11-1.,. NUI • 0 25 ® 100 100 SCALE N FEET NORTM J m W Z Q U m f TN,FRFG4TFJ OROUPOFFLOR/RA "CWW ft flee [ a" F1 "d I I I I I I ,y 1 I Submitted into the pohlic reco in connectign with Item 2_ on al I Walter Foeman City Clerk 0 0 - 11 9Q"f" U0l0NC El 0�10se L]�DRAEeiIsSA�IcTO�OMetel GWAMF llARQ i�ItR.1�lrieMS 00E FLOWa*2w =oLml i >Zt* Mali x5xMG-: XMM s•EAr =.c.QI2.1 ■■mill• ■■ ".1iffifl1 � fffl, 01/4 9 0 0 • U AMI $� My to- 41 .�M. �m �m s� Mir �s m �fl eo •.,.fie u�a w �a r nsv.Kr ,, ace Submitted into the public record in connection with item, on Walter Foeman City Clerk S ELEVATION A 1.11 Hrs 550 • B,a,m p THEREL�4TE0 GROUPOFfRFjvA1wrti+�ni Ft 3� Ma or Use S ecia/Permit �Phof* X5.37202 Far: 305.372m5 submittal set: September /r4 2X0, y 3t s�'� _■ e e s �� � ■ �� !■ 1►�i11 � �I� � I I►�i1 �e ! � 1MI I : �I� : 11►/1 �e ! ©1► III : �I� : 11► �I �© ! � ©�� � � �� ©1►♦i11 : �I� : 11►�i1 �e e � — ■ — � 1■ 1► III � �I� � 11► �I �� ! ©� ■ ■ � .� � 1►:III ! �I� : II►��I �!� ! S i ■ ! ■ � � 1►��11 !! �I� ! 11►��I �!7 ! — �— — — ! � 1► III � �I� � 11► �I —A ! — �— — — ► � 1► III � �I� � 11► �I �s ! — �— — — � 1► III � �I� � 11► �I �e ! ®1 ■ ■ ■ ,� ®1► 11 �I� 11►�i1 �® e — �— — — � 1► III : �I� : 11► �I �e ! INN INN — �— — — � 1► III : �I� : 11► �I �e ! ��� : �� iii ■ loll : ■I■ : I11 1111111111s ! 1111111 2 PEA : ■ �• S 1► ■ 111 : ■I■ : I11 1111111111s ! INA �'�� � � �►'� � �� 1►tit ■ 1�11 � ■I■ � I1�1 �s ! � 2 MIN 1 ■ ■ _.SI .�� �I1_11 ,! • 0 • Submitted into the public record in connection with item RZ--L on 1�LQ Walter Foeman City Clerk 44R49 560�icke/A&do2W Ahn ( R MV Phow 305.372W Fax; OX 3721175 m W z Q U U) M M Major Use Special Permit SUrifia/ set; September M4 XX. M �W-V FMESTPoAN WALKWAY DESK*M FOR 30 TON. FFE TRUCK ACCESS N OFFICE GROUND LEVEL PLAN A 2. 1 ME p TH,fRrAT,FD CROUP81,6P-1W 7 LE I %�f� I AIP Air 1 � i AL 1 0 1 0 • ARO 550 &iake/Ave, Size 200 A&rr� R 331M Phase 305.372W Fax : 305.372V5 90 m 73 µ i7 ffi PARKNO NG.VD. (M PARKNG SPACES) 08 ffi DN a 97M �� d m !a RV 4= &F. VM 1111,4001 IMMEME111 on BONN Me 11, 10 i 101 �1 110MMI Wsp 'Olt FA Ll Major Use Special Permit ,q"a/ set; September 7M, 2000.. Submitted into the public record,in connection with item / 2_ on -2hN�G�/ Walter Foeman N City Clerk FICE FLOOR PLAN AT LEVEL 4 A 2.4 KS THEI�EMTED 6ROMP OFd6I�.� � • • 560 ARa A Site 200 Aivn R 33IN Pl a►e- 305372W Fax; 303721175 Major Use Special Permit Stff tta/ set : September 71n4 2000, Z16 Submitted into the public record,in connection with item on � Gv Waiter Foeman N City Clerk GFFICE LOW-RISE @ PICG LEVEL PLAN A 2.5 NM L a T/f,FREM TM SROMP 0,FRORMA 282 Caret Way. Pen#v" 1 Mama R 33W5 0 0- 1 1 3 7 • 0 • ARA' AF MAW M a 550 9kkel Ave, Stile 2W R 330 Phase W5.372W Fax: 305.3721175 Major Use Special Permit Submittal set: September /V 4 2= Z16 Submitted into the public recor in connection item t� on with Walter Foeman N CityOFFICE Cs LOW4;USE @ PIN LEVEL PIMA 2.5a NM L a THERELATED GROUP OfQRf0�4 2828 Caa/ Way. Affl# " 1 Miami R 33145 , ��,,-�'�IC���C�CIGRf. �, • �� IIGIGIG < �_: I �,' LI��I�GItI�� I� 'GIGIt y� .:�"�:�4 i�i�Gl�It !� '•: IIGI`IC p l/ti .. �: �ClG:%G5i i. ids t. 'IC t. ': �i i� �� I,.J�1 I, Ig•I 6 NU ,.. h Lei c' i' -I .. .... I'AS• .�;�i,. �'R?e''. 9i�e'.I�! IjCc•IICN.iC�iCC�IeNI`Ci ,%`�r►��1A-1►/tifi��7�Io!•CI•aI./.iL: I . .:.:.:.'.:.:.:.:.:....7.: C� 3C�4m3 . jC .i. li!_%.I.11a111.10� 4 _ :::::.iiii : , :�. , /'-. ..Ire. •.Cj �ICNCI:ICIO C `,\ J:: :C N ' e� �eICICIeI/O ��`::::"' J ::: •:: ::C.R': ..1N Zeb".el 1. /C: :.:C:' -a room■mil■■■■loom■■ii■■■mil■■■■ii■■■ii■■■mia■■■■■id ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■dMEMEME Mommommommommomp MEN MENEM ■■ MEMO ■ ! N ■■■■■■■■■■■mm■■■■■■■ x ■■■■■■ ���il■al i Dm ■mm■■■■romm MEN MEN ■■moll■ - I1■■I,.. �■omom ■■■■■■■ill■r,p OEM mom■ �-�'� 1' ■■■■■■�I■■' ''�mmTi■■■■■ m■■mm■mm���'' M■■m■■■W-... �1■■ram _J■�Smm■■■■■■■ ■■V■■■O� r■mm■■■'� hill■■rim■Cm■■m■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■� so OEM ■i■mmm■■■■■■m■■■■■■7■ ■offFF / r,■■■■■■■■■■m■■■■■■■■■■■■■m■■■��"r \a\\\\\ a WOMEN �/ �� �■■■■■■■■■■■■■�■■■■■■■■��� ``/'� ��� � . ,fir\\\\\\\\\\\\ \�� 'MN��40 i F I iilllllllllll :il■I■■ !IIIIIIIIIIII'�f� ■�� Illllllllllllla■■■■■ illlllllllllll 11■� ■- 111111111111111:Iloilo !111111111111111=f■�� ■- I I I I I II I I I I I I I' f■■■�■ 1111111111111111-1■� ■-lo IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII Iloilo IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII_A■Bill - !11111111111111117■■■■■ "Illlllllllllllllf■ i 111111111111111E f ■■■■■ IIIIIIIIIIIIII111_■■ _ iPllllllllillllllf■■�■■ " IIIIIIIIIIIIIh■■ A l l 11 llllllll ■■■■■■ - ,lilllllllllllll■■ iilllllllllllllllll€■■■■■■ ! I I I I11111111111 ■ ■ �! I I I IIIIIIIIII' ■■■■; '1l11111111111117■■■I - "MOORE 1111111111111111 1■■■I - I!IIIIIIIII111111 1■�■�f�l gllllllllilllll 1■■�II '- !IIIIIIIIIIIIIII■��■`■I si11111011111 -'Rfi NINE Bill __ - -__ � ■i ffi_ ffi• IIIIIf1111f1/1/1/111111111111' - IMP, :1liflffff■111111/■1■1■111111i1: fi fi li li• 11i11ff11/IIIIIIIf111■IIIIIIII- _ Ieu111fffffff111/f1/Illliwr< fi ■i• Ifi ffi■ 1111IIIIIIIIIIIIIII/1/IIIIIIII'.' _ 11111I1111f■111111/1/1■IIIIIIII': i If111II1111/IIIIIIIIII■IIIIIIIL rifllllff1111111111111/111/1IIII�' M1IfIIllllff■ff111111/IIfI1111111A 1f11fIIIIIII■11111111111/IIIIIItt _ lfffffffffl/1/IfN■/■/11/NIIUt! �iff11111111111111/IIIIIIIIIIIIIA! � � � � if11111111f111111111111111111111i IIIII■f11f■11/11111111111/UI/IM fi fi fi ;fi 7f111fIff1111111f11111111111111P low �iIIIfIf■/1■111■1/1f1111111I1Uil fi• � ■i fi• If1If11111/111/11111/1/IIIIIIIIlk IffI11/IIIIIIIIIIIf111111IIIIIII name IfIf11111111/1/11111/IIIIIIIIiItr .- If111111111111111111/1/IIIIIIIIi name, 1ff111111111111111f1111111111111 sommi UIIIIIII////IIIIIIII/1/1/IIIIIF soon, ------------------------------ ■� f f f !■/ffflll■11■NNI/IIINIIOIIa• - Illfflf■f■■■IIIf1111fIf11111111ti ■ "l■IIIIIIIIIf■IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII^ ■ 7II111/11111111111/IIIIIIIIIIII Iflllff■ffI11/1111111/■IIIIIIII uw[go-INS Immmm■-■■■-�I IIIIIII twf11• me so i -If ,40 �R�i\i1��t� m1 10 !N11" �rvi of MIT �1 b�'',``� ` wa N I IPU./F' U Q '{ 'Y •\Il mim!%I ! O a me me h. TO 131h_ A f Al ? fololl I mos. P�� =' pp I. NUMMUM 10 HHUM 1 A ]to% 19 0 '1.7r_, F/.7/ff`&.'l/l//l/l`ff.-Il//"///,F, Xr. 50., will -le,_' LIM ON ............ ........... 0,4 ....... ... MUP Hl .......... I ... ..... .... ........... .......... ............. Alp-- W • `��Il I F(7-1 dn� Oil I NI4 0NO-4 in: 17 .... i �j/ICIN ICI�Ifltl�� C�CI I�'�IOII'I.7, I�Il�i�1lICIi�I�I����CICI! Cllt�rP♦tI-'C�I�N�I�I! �flllr)I,iIN�-'I��j�It%ICIC`� �6t 7, r! `�.C�Ci i�IeCle Il�I�INl;Iile%tlIrCC_MClt♦t�o���IC��: _ - �. . ...:: -- < c 1 ■ / 'I- r C - • ........................................... ...... ............. ............... _ i r � 7 I t LVA rr it Ig ccgn e - c : 0 I— r •• R' II •• . 1 i C I CC •• CWITZIFImo' O • !I•I♦ . •••••••••.. �� .war -� I I . N ► o`. . • P C c.• ► / I • (0 .. i .. i c• � ,• i ♦ ! I L .. .. i Y .. •• I .. ♦. e r. — c � r c Ise .r e � '♦r . ••�� ., a n' �- �� \� '� .,,, .� c-c INe . 1 ♦ ,f IIII■1111 �,.t.I q - - •.\•.'. ": t�".f. :� ,�. . ,1 � ` : ter♦. � 1 ► . ►- ai -xm 1� /w UMMUN . .�. .•. �1 J : `�.) ,Z, r Ii�rie♦c 0•:1' �i►/1� y\.I:i►. 1 `���� \. ' eel► . .�' OR U. t �, . i ••: °............ I:i ._�\ r_ —� •• ,cam, _ WIN .aN\1\���"\\""\ f Ai t.. •I �rir =� 'n..� r1 ��• Ne Ie•. !ee 14 .. ICI ;Ir , �< <. I!• � P ` : �• •�` ��`• '� ``� i so me A i l i 7 MA j•� � I r IGrG G� -. �i - :III rGIC! illP.• ►r Ie,e.::eeeeee ,,.iGI:�rNe l�ioriG r" i.rGl� to so 1 I■. 1_ I— ..L. 1— I_ ..IL. 1— 1— ..L. 1— -- 1 _ ' I 111�E•■�. I_ I_ 1— I_ 11! — I_ I..— 1— ulu 1— I■.I �1 m 7� lb - - 1 111� - lam ..L waLF ik i— I�111-w .. — 11 ..I. 111�III�III��Grrl �`I I I_ 1— 1 I e m� w — I.. 1— 1— ..L.1— 1— ..I ..r a is■.■.■r a -i..... ■N., I.■ I— I.. 1— I— 1— ..L. I_ ..L. 1— 1—. J— h ■.I — I— lu I— 1— ulu 1_ Imo, ul - _ L. 1— t— ..I.. ` L. — ................—........---1.■ I— 1— ..L.1— I— ..I = ....:::::::......—........... 's'siia I— I_ 1 1— I l— 'I..l— 1— maim. 1- .■I - 1— t— .■I■ 1— - ..1 I— 1111.. — I- 1— t— ■■I. — ..I L 1— ■■I.■ I— 1— ..1 L. I— 1— 1 I.. L— l— ■■I■■ I— I- ■■1 jan] I. ...................................................................... ::::::::_:::: 1— ;" '' .. ,ciiiiiiiii` � yt�r� :.:.1.... .......... °I .,.--. .._"_._�■_ I:' .. L - I— i _ ■. ,. I,� I_ ■■I 1_ � — —_ _ _ 0 0 0 0 0 0 WR49 00 &kkdAM && 200 h" R 33131 Ph"-3053721M Fax: 3=72195 Major Use Special Permit &bff&al set; Seplwdw gbh 2M. S0 Ubmtfrecr . 04 th-a 0owd 44M bldc 4zo: I- I vvai,i City cle-rk" RESIDENTIAL BUILDING NORTH ELEVATION A3.13 fas- j T/f, F REM T, F, 0 CROUP 0, F FL Orsa f/ � 2.9Z Care/ Way. Pmffo" I M" R MW • Ol AR� 550 dare/ AM Stile 200 Mari* R 331X Phan- X5372W Fax: 305.3721175 Major Use Special Permit &"at set : September /-b4 200Q d Submitted into the public f?P9Td l�nnnr^, 11 with 11m oil /?.,� Lt�1�'! Foaman City Clerk EAST ELEVATIONIWING A 3.14 Hrs L d THEREM TER OROMPOFFLORIPA 2828 Cara! Way. Pengo" I Mlam hi MW Y i mm i 19 - COCO, 380SF-S 10 -CON( .. rnrnc �n Irlmow 2.2d5 SF - ,4LV Jr -.7RRVOJ IirvV VRVUI 7-SMALL TREES S T Ci - m Ji—i—L W I --1--1-- �_ m 1_!y i i S�. V �,,,�`t." MAP � 0 CLUBHOUSE 160 SF - SHRUBS 780SF-SHRUBS 9 - SMALL PALMS O -y=11 Vf 3-SMALL 2.250 SF - 3-VERCH 2 - SMALL 5 - SMALL -.1- VEIT( 30SF- Submitted into the public recor in co�cl on item �� Walter Foeman City Cie* 00-1131 ROOF LEVEL LANDSCAPE PLAN L 2 0 m W z Q U m . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NMI -.4-- N AE, AS COCONUT PALMS IN TREE GRATES HEIGHTS VARY - INFORMAL SPACIN CONCRETE UNIT PAVERS CONCRETE UNIT PAVERS WITH ALTERNATING COLORS D� o MIAMI RIVER DOCK LIGHTED BOLLARD WITH CHAIN MEDJOOL DATES - UNIFORM HEIGHT - WITH UPLIGHT SEATING DECORATIVE WATER FEATURE - LIGHTED AERATED JETS CONCRETE UNIT PAVERS ALTERNATING COLOR AND BOND ENLARGED PLAN - BISCAYNE BOULEVARD PLAZA 0 into the public connection with on falter i'Oeman ENLARGED PLAN OF BISCAYNE POINT PLAZA city clerk 118,=T-0, 0 0 - 1131 C J 1�1 � Y DOUBLEIPOLE TOP LIGHT FIXTURE 20'-0• �a,-o• ram - (PAVED FIRE LANE) I. i li '1 JtC 1 . i IVN - KIVtKWALK LIGHTING COVERED SEATING (PAVED FIRE LANE) () SECTION - RIVERWALK SEATING 2 ROYAL OR COCONUT PALM SHRUB AND GROUNDCOVER (PAVED FIRE LANE) () SECTION - RIVERWALK PALMS 3 POLE TOP - DOUBLE FIXTURE BENCH WITH SHELTER LIGHTS ROAD AND SAYWALK DETAILING SIMILAR TO LIGHTING FIXTURE FINISH TO MATCH BUILDING MULLIONS FINISH TO MATCH BUILDING MULLIONS PROFILE ELEVATION ELEVATION SECTION RIVERWALK FURNITURE fitted into t ionn public ct on with on /"Way AT GRADE L 5 0 _ 11 7 LANDSCAPE DETAILS Clem ■ 3M17i79 sic:1307914967. RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE.CITY OF `IAMI COMIISSION AUTHORIZING ISSUANCE OF A DEVELOP:QNT ORDER, APPROVING WITH MODIFICATIONS. THE ,BALL PQIIiI' ' PROJECT, A DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IHPACZ. PROPOSED BY HOLrJELL CORPORATION. FOR TRACT D. DUPONT PLAZA (30.11). LOCATED ON THE NORTH RANK AID AT THE MOUTH OF THE ZtwtI RIVER, AFTER Cou- DUCTING A PUBLIC HEARL`G AS REQUIRED BY CHAPTER • 380.06, FLORIDA STATUTES, AND CONSIDERING THE REPORT AND 1EC0%2 X'4DATIONS OF THE SOUTH FLORIDA REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL AND THE PLANYINC ADVISORY sOARD OF THE CITY OF MA, SUBJECT TO THE COIDITIONS OF THE.DEVELOPMENT ORDER ATTACHED HERETO AS EXHIBIT "A"; THE RECOCL`QNDATIONS OF THE SOUTH FLORIDA PiGIONAL PLAX300 COUNCIL ATTACHED HERETO AS E4423IT "B"; AND THE APPLICA- TION FOR DEVELOP$XNT APPROVAL INCORPORATED BY REFERENC2; FINDING THAT THE DE:Z :OPER'S.PROP031D CHA4GES FROM THAT APPROVED* BY Ti:3 SOUTH FLORIDA REG:O'IAL PLA.%':1I*0 COU:;CIL INVOLVE NO SUBSTANTIAL DEVIATION; FURTHER DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO SEND THE RESOLUTION TO AFTECTED AGZ:.CIES AND THE DECELOPZR. i, cri v Wit "*—.AS. The Miami Planning Advisory Board, at ice meeting N "U held on May 16. 1979. Item !1, following an advertised hearing. O O LL ' U adopted Resolution No. PAB-23-79by a 7 to 0 vote (1 somber sbsec:). recommending approval of the Development Order for the Sall point c� ??� r� C O Project. a Development of Regional Impact, as hareinafcer scc forcht v41-r) '- and �_ •C fI:1Dines OF FACT WHEREAS. Holywell Corporation has proposed the undercaking of Id the Ball Point Project, a Development of Regional Impact, as U) E defined by Chapcer 21F-2, Rules of the State of Florida Deparment of Administration, located within the City of Miami, an a treat of 8.46 acres. at the North.bank and at the mouch of the -Miami River. comprised of $05,400 square fees of gross office spate, 630 hotel units in a structure containing 653.400 square feet of gross hocal space; 500 dwelling units; 85.000 square feet of gross space for .retail use; and 2.365 parking spaces; and r CGINm=xmn, OP in A Is, _ I vRLRLAS. Nolywell Corporation has submitted a complste Application for Development Approval for a Development of Rigional — Upaec to the South Florida Regional Plannins tou+eiT pursuant to Chapter 380.06 Florida Statutes. and did receive a favorable reeomendation for a proposed development order on :{q 7. 1179. -as set forth in the.Report and Racommandations of the South Florida 6xional Tannin` Council attached bereto as Lxhibit "I" and made a' part hereof; and I-IMMAS. the Application for Developmet;: Approval. as reviewed by the South Florida Regional Planning Council. referred to an off-: building with 9:8.200 square feet or gross office speca; a hotel structure wi:h 530.000 gross square feet. and a parking structure vita 2.560 parking spaces. which does not amount to outstanding change from what is now proposed; and wK"v. AS. Holyvell Corporation has complied with all the requizazonts set forth in Ordinance No. $290. and VHIRIAS. the City Cot=isstan has considered the.Repert and Racotaandations of the South Florida Regional Planning Council and each elamont required to be considered by Chapter 380.06 Florida Statutes; and CONCLUSIONS Or LAv . WHEMAS. the Ball Point Project. proposed by the Holrfell Corporation complies with the Kiami Comprehensive he-ghborhood'Plan. is consistent with the orderly development and goals of the City of Misni. and complies with local and development regulations. being Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance No. 6811; and HHLttAS. the proposed development doaa not unreasonable inter - fora with the achievement of the objectives of the adopted teats Land Development Plan applicable to the City of Miami; and WUFJAS. the proposed development is consistint with the Report and Recoe:mandacions of the South Florida Regional Planning Council and does not unreasonably tnter!srs with any of the eonsldoraeiona, and objectives set forth in Chapter 330. Thortda Statutes; and Q V L C -� E E U N U m cw cC c_ cps _ O N L- Cn U— +t.'.. %M111AS. Ns .0 "t.onat loari en its" :`.. +479. grancad &,variance fr6�o toe 300 foot ha+igh: limit and granted Condition41 Use approval for parking uses as'aliowed in Ordinance ',a. 6171. the Ccmprehansive boning Crd.LAM-cs for the City of t:ia®i, and VNLP.LAS. the City Corimission has determined that all rsauirs- ■ence of publication and other legal reauirensnts fee the issuance of the proposed Develoosenc Order have bssn conpliod with, and djREAS.-the'City.Coe=.ission deens-it advisable and in the beet interests of the general welfare.ef the City e4 Miami to 'issue a Development Order !or the Development of Regional Iapaat, as hereinafter set forth; POW. THEREFORE. 1L I. RLSOLVED 1T THE CM^gSSIOM OF THE CITY OF mu n, FLORIDA: Section I. A Dovelopeisnt Order. aetaebod hereto as Exhibit "A", a=yrovi-g with modifications. the gall rein: project. a Dsve:opmar.: o: Regional I -pay:. proposed by Mol;roll Co:;oration for Tract D. =703 PLAZA (50-1:Y. located on the North tank and at the mouth of the Miami River, be and the same is hereby granted and issued Soc:rah 2. The Lapor: and taco=andations of the South Tiarida Regional Planning Council dated May 7. 1979. is attached as bxhibi: "1'% and spade s par: of this OsveioT•anc Order. Section 3. The Application for Development Approval is incorpocaced herein by reference and relied upon by the parties in discharging their statutory duties under Chapter 390.06 Florida Statutes. Substantial compliance with the r4Pressnt8ti2as contained in the Application for Development Approval is a condition for approval unless waived or modified by agreement anon$ the patties. Section 4. pursuant to Section 360.06 (2), Florida Statutes. the City of Miami has reviewed the proposed changes to the Appliea- tion for Development Approval from that approved hy.the South Tlorida Rsgional planning Council, and finds no substantial deviation there- from. Section S. The City Clark is hereby authorised and directed to send certified copies of this Resolution insaadiately to the ! Tlorida Division of State Planning, Department of Administration. Room 530. Carlton luilding. Tallahassee. Florida 32304; to the tcS � E Q. C O, � 0 LL L U O O O cO C O �ll ° E Cf) U it `40M . South Florida RaSionaLl- M aLng Council. 1313 N.Y. 167ts Street. Suits 429. MiaUi. Florida: and to Colyvall Corporation. ! DuPont Eirclo.-Sdita 100. YaaSinStoa.* D.=_C: ' FASSM AXO AD ?=. this 2& dap of „or 1179. MACUCf A YOU ATTZSTs V• V5O PWARLD AXD APPROVED BY: acu : F.16ty 7ctarney APPROKO AS TO FORM AND CORRE=ESS s ccS L• U v v .0 LL v U v o c= oo = o d c t� �'� v. O E co 2 - 4 - 46 r -'r • • .1 .. r... .. • • .I�r • • �..r ti �'-"�'•'�-.-vy a. -.ter,-.r mauls . Damcr$ant ofmcw Lot it be kaeva that plan"&% is Chapter 300.0 Florida Statutes rho CoMINlsslan of the City of ftisdd flotilla has awuldoted to public heating held sn fur 34, 197 the issuance of D.velopswat Order set Sall polat. a Dovelepeeat sf Regional Ssvac to be located In the City of Miami. pursuant to C►ptar 360.06 florid• Statutes "A asset due cossidaraumm of the eon*latemar of this preposed dewlepmeat With togulAUSAS. and the »epos* Sad lvoommeAsUms of the South flerids aagloaal planelag Council. the CseeLL.uom took tho follavlag actions Approval of this dswlepsrat With the�joili tar,. srdlsleations. Develeoeent � . � �. 1. The dew':, %*nt to limited to a project eontainiag not more thsa$ 60S.400 eguare :. sf Jesse office space$ 410 hotel units fa a structure oea- taLnlno 652,400 Square feat of gross hotel space, S00 dwolllag units$ $S.000 Square foot of Igoe* retail we and 3,363 patkial spaces. Thd project u proposed would cmewriae an average fleas area matte of 4.36 fog the 8.46 acre site, approval having boos pwevleemly granted for • va Ianee team the 300•-foot halght limit sod oerditlonal Use, approval tow parking mass. fvc%"r, the lot oevatege lsJl�tr tfa gwased usable even apaoo is 17 mot$ the owclosod pedestrian open space at main floor leval is is t as specified by the Applicant Lq the Application tot Davelopmest Approval and the prollsia"T design des$a.ata of word► 33. 1171 as amended by Supplemot dated M&Y 11 1979. N q LL. C Co q GJ . C � OU Vi (D "Ifl: 120790972 3. The aPpliaAst.is aewvsg" t$ Address the tollevtAg eeaeerAs about the psoMgd IeveloPmeats a. Astivitlas AMold be to arpovat" slowg.tm River walk Le order to prevlde manisgtul ant eMUAVGW pedeavdam experiences sad attraeti$as. . b. Atteatlam shed be gives to the troatmest at the Ptsesyme Go"evard !agate to aorllseate tbo awareat bwlk of the strwtsrs. S. Atsamtiee.should be giver withta the Project to previdiag vier$ of Me PAaat River and Usgsyma MT As. for example. by laterler design of the vets floor level. d. AttehUm sheald be gives to shade red landseaPisg as the po"m love%. Thesg owmarms. as ebour M gonatrwttso doeum"U , are subjegt to plsaaw tr04atmat approval prior to the Lssumga of a bstldiag pared% ter parkiag ant nary wealosed we". Peewits ter Much sAttars es fesndatisss. "Swan renovation MA site Pravaratlos will be Lass". Mwevee, upon proper appligatians therefore. pp before aech approval Is required. 7. The affileast will d"ieata a p"eatrias eaeerest of art less them 30 Lost i to the Ctty of Miashi it Perpetuity for Mtamt River walk wad Payfemot walk PesPeoas, and will eosatruds the wall wad Provide fnxmitwe sM landotaµag dammed Aaasssary'►T the City of Masi. TM APPligant will d"Lps the aasor vest crow sad adjaaome Private gage to allay views sad access from the project establishments, while fostering appeopriato "us a" at the valkwe hospoasibllity for perpetual osiatMasgo of All agCtigss of tM walk bT the +hPPltcart will be specifies is the eessment doav mot. Final landseep P1aAt aeo subject to the approval of the Planning and Public warts 0op"Im ats pr to the issuance of a permit for the ma" slvec walk A" "I con% L16 m .l. Pormits for test matters as fouadasiame, seawall 116owetism, eOd •lta grow will be laeoed. beweves. yes proper opplisetlsso sberafm batees.00eft approval is required. a, "a appllssws "all Provide lsndesaloi trestmems ter the oasserly and a t i Ctepts Via" as a me" at eemmeotim,t t a .aytrsts ft" with am$~& 1 part. as lows se"arable is the dimasalm,ss of Mo esytrsmt r.u.wia i- msihrematoo by the APplssaat. tim,al "a""" loss" an adrjees a an G) C C LY "Prev" of loss plammlmq Daparraiewt and tart• Depastaeas. :: ' S. Sesjose is-AtaimW all m,spasaey Pesrlea ed apprewal;. L► loss •vat C 10 . a U ._ - "as a ""wawa People )Move Statist is lessad at. er li tso visia/ty of. C.�. w• _ sissay"""a" betweem sa Ud sad lea aveaees, tbas tin Aplicant shall � f- `CU proviM ss upper. loyal pedestria eoetewti•m, to rho statles. 0 to the evert that she developer to sootessful is soquislat o~rsRip of at "D least three of the tsar blocks is adjacent "act tlsaa, them the Apllsant � . •Hall oonaider the ProviS/ea of as eloloer lsvel pdsatsism sonsastsoe trom j �, p E • tus project to the Applicant's future development la Dupont tiara. Tattiest and ►*0104 prior is the Issuance of a bulldim,q peredt. for parhiq .epd awlesed areas. (permits few such matters is feutdatlSA, seawall seaovatlom ad Site preloara V111 be Isaued. lowewer. epee proffer eppllaselems tsentme. ►aton auss apps in requlydd). the Applicant sball. usiaq assemptiosa. sod gsaesatlos rate• a able to the Dada amety Daparmmea of Trattie and Tramspertatlon (•Caanty) South tlorida taalatal platm,ssl Cowell (•Council•), prepare sad svbalt W91 Prieto data asd.docwasatton atfinutlwiy damenstsatial to the SatlStaati+ i of the City at ►diaai public woOo and planalnp Departments ('City") sad sir County acceptable Interim, irpravements to allow toa&ays to Operate as lava of service acceptable to the City and the County In the A.M. and t ►s&k 1 5� .tea+.s...ei• �;w/�w. • '«:130 9PC4974 data and'dv;.ktatien shall also L+elude projeetie" acceptable to the City, the Council and the•Ceemg estabL4shimt wben iapleaan' tation of interim coluttens shall be required in whole or 1A part. Such pre3ections shall be reviewed am"lly after begiminj of eeovpanay and. when appropriate. modified by the City. the Ceensil and.th* Ceunty. ?he Agpiitant shall.pey its egnitable share of the (_� C CC 1LC cost of implementing the acceptable Lsterfm improvements. prior to '? N U the issuance of a DuiidL q peralt for pas7dn9 and enclosed areas (permits for such nattess as foundation. seawall renovation and �_ U site preparation will be issued. however, vyoe proper applications O C-- r- = 0 Co tharefor before such approval is required). the Applicant shall estimate in a maneer acceptable to the City or .. C U C O I' 1 O -4-6 PIC. T�14975 the County. such equitable share and bond that mount Pith the City of the County. Prior to the•iasuasce of a building permit for parking and enclosed are" (Pormits for such natters as foundations, seawall renovation end Nice Preparation will be Issued. however. upon Proper applications" cherafor before such approval is required) the Applicant shall obtain a -commitasat on. the part of the City and the County to iaplemeat the acceptable interim impco^oeancs by the ciao indicated by the prolectlot Copies of documents. dace and commitments chall be seat to the Council and Lacorporat Late the Application for Oevelopeost Approval. B. The Applicant will fund the following improvements to Biscayne Boulevard along the site which ate necessary to accommodate Bell Point traffics provision of four traffic lanes on Biscayne Boulevard free the southernmost site access paint to SZ Ia! Street end will dedicate any property necessary for such improvesencss raw val of the island near SZ ]rd Street. provision of a traffic signal at St ]rd Street, said addi- tion of a second left, turn law northbound onto St lnd Street. If approved interim improvements. under y above. obviate the saad for any of these impreveneats. such isprova"ats(s) shall not be required. !. The Applicant will rasarve the land located vast and south of the eastern right-of-ws of Biscayne Soulavard extended. and will dsdicats that land cc the appropriate $overt sent agency if the land is required for Construction of a Mani paver crossing or. in the event that such construction does net proceed. will dedicate that land to the City of Mltai fora Public purpose. 10. The AppLicasc will negotiate as agreement with the City of Miami, providing for two t traffic Lases on Chapin Plata unobstructed by parking ssnamamts for adequate access to the hotel. with the balance of right-of-way on Chopia Plata devoted to patting. Miami Uver Bayfroat Walk purposes and ether approved uses. The applicaac shall ladessify the Off,; -Street Parking Authority for a1 loss of Satatad parting Spaces attributable to providing adequate access to the hotel. U C Lt cri EU Q'� C O .O p U-- U m U O r U C p U� ry C -� .O O U �. eNsn o«: 13079N4916 11. The Applicant will provide at least the equivalent of the spaces that would be required by the Dads County,Zonln4 Code (Section 37-124(a)1 toe exclusive use by condominium residents and 4sests. The Applicant say provide such parking supply through eonStrvetion of additdmal self -parking facilitioss through facility redesigns through deal" for and. provisions of val'at parking. at a ossbiastiss of the above methods. tnvi rommontal 12. The applicant will repeat to the south florida agional planning Council the results of its marine cemmmunity survey before proceeding an Seawall ronevati If viable marine comunities are datoetsd. the Applicant will incorporate. in its Corps of fngineors perait application. measures to mininise Impact of Sewall renovation an these organlase. 11. The applicant will inform the Dodo County uiStOrid Survey Of the ineeptien AM timing of excavation for the psojeet. 14. The Applicant shall secure o Coapimx Soonea *exalt peter to the laetptidn Sf ematcWtiem. 1S. This Development order shall be sell and Vold it Substatla1 development of •' the site has not Won within two years of the reasrded'data of the OsysloPm Order. , ld. The Applicant will lacarporate all additiamal latorseties regessted by this Development order and revisions submitted by the Appliaast subsequast is original submission of the.Applieatiom fee Dovelopment Approval iau a ssae- plats daeu:n nt Sod will provide eeples L a USISIT manner to the S@etb Hari l Regional planning Comell. City of Masi. Dade County and the State. _ C `C _ CL E U O O .O L1. r- 5 ct% . c = Ul ` � C O SUE: L TO 1' .M Q 57E G Pic: I209PA978 RESOLLTION io. 8 0 - 7 07 " A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY.OF 41011 COMMISSION AMENDING PARAGRAPH 7, ZXRIBIT "A", RESOLUTION 79-396; NAY 24.1079. BEING A DEVELOPMENT ORDER, APPROVING WITH MODIFICATIONS. THE BALL POINT (MIAMI CENTER) PROJECT: WHICH AMENDMENT REQUIRES AGRZ;EKNT - ON JNTERIM TRAFFIC 13IDROVEI[LYTS PRIOR "TO THE ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY RATHER THAN PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT; - FINDING THAT THIS AMENDMENT -DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A 3U83TANTIAL DEVIATION- FROU THE TERUS OF THE DEVEIAPMENT- ORDER, AND FURTHER DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO S0D THIS RESOLUTION TO AFFECTED AGENCIES AND THE DEVELOPER. WHEREAS, the City of Miami Commission by Resolution 79-396, dated May 24. 1979 issued a Development Order, approv-, 109 with modifications, the Ball Point project, a Development of Regional Impact to be.located on.Tract D. DuPont Plaza (30-11). and WHEREAS, paragraph 7, Exhibit "A", of the Development Order requires the developer, Holyv*ll Corporation, to submit documentation concerning the design and schedule for the imple- mentation of interim traffic improvements acceptable to the City of Miami prior to the issuance of a building permit, and WHEREAS, the projected construction schedules'tor the Ball Point project, now known as Miami Center, and the adjacent four block DuPont Plaza area pose severe time and operating constraints in the interim period, sad "DOCUMENT INDEX ITe l Ng�„ WHEREAS, a Dupont Plaza Task Force sepresea in ad private and public agencies, was appointed September B, 1960 by the Transportation Planning Council of the Metropolitan Planning Organization to expeditiously recoaanend a schedule of implementa- tion for interim and final traffic improvements to public agencies CITY COMMMSM ' C n MErnn OF C `LL � CN U Cll O LLL 5 L U C O O • U1 _ O . a E «,Pit..IpT9rca9T9 and private entities, and. WREREAS, the Covisission finds-thit-It is in the public Interest to continue totasstg? overall public and"priv&te coordination and participation in interim and final traffic ,aglutions in the DuPORt Plaza .area by providing that Bolywell Corporation reach agreement on interim traffic improvements prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy rather than a building permit; JJ i KOr, THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED by TRZ COMMISSION OF TRZ CITY Of HIAMI, FL0RIVA: Section 1. Paragraph 7, Exbibit "A", Resolution 79=396; Yay 24. 1979. being a Development Order. 'v approving with modifications, the ball Point (!Baal Center) project Is hereby aosaded in the following part ieulass:—/ Traffic Access and Parking 7. Prior to the issuance of L Yxii�/sg•�esm;s, certificate of occuDaneY, for parking Lad enclosed areas, (permits for such matters as foundation, seawall renovation and site prop - it d+ arstion will be issued, however, upon proper applications therefor, before such approval is required). the Applicant shall. using .assumptions. Lad generation rates acceptable ;'. to the Dade County Department of Traffic and Transportation .("County") and to South norida ROgional Planning Council ("Council"). prepare Words and/or figures stricken shall be deleted. Underscored words and/or figures constitute the amendment proposed. The remaining provisions Lre now in effect and remais unchanged. U =t C ?5 - CL C ! © a LLCD � L U Cco — _=0E �. s«:13aTs4980 and submit appropriate data and documentation affirmatively demonstrating to the satisfac- tion of the City of Miami Public Works and Planning Departments (",City") and the County acceptable interim.improvemtnts to allow road- ways to gperate.at levels of servict sc:eptable to the City and the County in the A.M. and P.M. peak hours pending the completion of final h traffic improvements. The data and document& - tics shall also include projections acceptable to the City, the Council and the County establish- , tog when implemint'stion of :nteria solutions shall be required in whole or in part. Such projections shall be reviewed annually 'after beginning of occupancy and, when appropriate, modified by the City, the Council and the County. The Applicant shall pay Its equitable share of the cost of implt- menting the acceptable interim improvements. Prior to the issuance of & irkidiag-permia certificate of occupancy for parking and enclosed areas (permits for such matters as foundation, seawall renovation and site preparation will be issued, however, upon proper applications therefor before such approval (' manner acceptable to the City or the County, such equitable share and bond that smouat with the City or the County. Prior to the issuance of a ►%&&dlsg peemie certificate of occupancy for parkin` and en- closed areas (permits for such matters a$ foundations, IW U C O r E U O N O O z' .O LL. O O O U� C: %• O U E C(3 �' Z 130T9G4981 seawall renovation and sitepreparation vi11 be issued, hovever,',upon proper applications. therefor, before such approval is required), ,the Applicant sball. obtain a commitment on ;the part of the City and the County to implement the acceptable interim improvements by the time . fi ;7!"ryT SU, f .'RTIVE iadicated by the projections. Copies of docu- DV meats, data Lad commitments shall be sent to FOLLOW" the Council and incorporated into the Applica- tion for Development Approval." 3ection.2. The City of Miami Commission finds that this amendment to paragraph 7(above) does not constitute a sub- stantial deviation from the terms of the Development Order f.> adproved by the City of Miami Commission by Resolution 79-398 y; dated May 24, 1979. Section 3. The City Clerk is hereby directed to immediately send certified copies of this Resolution to the Florida Department of Community Affairs, Division of Local Resource Managemeat, 2571 Executive Center Circle East, Tallahassee, Florida 32301; to the South. Florida Regional Planning Council, e 1515Nf 167tb Street, Suite 429. Miami. Florida, and to the 8olyvell Corporation, IS DuPont Circle, Suite 100. Washington. D. C. 20036. . CITY CLYJ �I P AND ,PROVED 8!: WfLL A. VALUTLAL A301STANT CITY ATTORNEY iOR_XC3#D CO CTNM C Y . C U N O CU lL ,U U O O � r O +. U� �y C O UO �. c Mc:13079PC4982 EXHIBIT 'B' Attached to, and made a part of Resolution 86-Ub; October 1. 1986 DEVELOPMENT ORDER (AS AMENDED OCTOBER 7. 19861 let it be known that pursuant to Chapter 380.06 Florida Statutes the Commission =of the'City of -Miami Florida has. considered in public hearing held on May 24. '1979 the issuance of Development Order for Ball Point. a Dtvelopment.of Regional Impact to be located in the City of Miami. .and has considered in public hearing u ld on October 7. 1986. the issuance of an amended Development Order for the Miami Center I project (A/K/A Ball Point Project) a. Development of Regional Impacto located in the City of Miami. Pursuant to Chapter 380.06 Florida Statutes and after due consideration of the consistency of this proposed development with pee pertinent regulations. and the Report and Recoamendations of the. South Florida Regional Planning. Council dated February 4. 1966. the 'Commission took the following action: Approval of this,developaent, as amended. � with the following modifications concerning and limited to that portion of the development located on the southern (3.01 acres) portion of Tract D, Block 1. DUPONT PLAZA (50-11) hereinafter referred to as 'One DuPont Plaza' (F/K/A Biscayne Plaza) (Exhibit 'F'): Development 1. Condition 1. as it applies solely to the southern portion known as One DuPont Plaza (F/K/A Biscayne Plaza), Exhibit A. Resolution 79-396; May 24. 1979 is hereby amended in the following respects: 'One DuPont Plaza (F/K/A Biscayne Plaza) is limited to a project containing not more than (See Figures 1. 2 and 3 attached in the appendix): Phase 1 component Units/Spaces Area (Gross Square Feet) Office Tower 700.000 1722' NGVD + 65' Antenna) Commercial 160.000 Residential 60 units 120,000 (in office tower) Parking 1.200 spaces • Sub -Total 980,000 Note: All language in Exhibit '8' following Condition 1 is new languaggee; constituting a major amendment to the Development Order. M. underlining has not been used; all language in Exhibit 'S' should be interpreted as if It were underlined. U �- C�CrJ 5 U C2 U U U. O r Co C O O U� �y C o E CD Q Page 1 of 19 Pefc:130T4 4983 Phase 2.. Office Tortr 180,000 (88V :NGVO •.65.' Antenna) Commercial 60.000 Residential 90 units 180,000 (in office tower) Sub -Total 1,020,000 Total (excluding parking)• 21000,000 "Notes Parking is equivalent to 600,000 square feet The project is subject to schematic design drawings (Sheets 1-13) dated January 21. 1986, as amended by drawings dated May 2, 1986 submitted by Schleicher -Soper, Architects. wherein 6 floors of residential are shown an the Phase I tower and 9 floors of residential are shown in the Phase 2 tower. Office uses may be substituted for these residential uses, at the option of the Applicant, without such action being considered a substantial deviation, subject to the approval of the Miawi,City Commission. Each Office Tower may include at the option of the Applicant a health club (1 floor)l a restaurant (1 fioor)l an executive club (1 floor)l a restaurant and cabaret on the top of the podium (on the roof or llth floor), and a tower observation center/skytop cafe, provided that these certain uses are included in the computation of •Commercial• above. The rink and roof garden on the podium level are considered open space. The project has been recommended for approval, In principle, by the Urban Development Review Board, on January 28, 1986, with the recommendation that at the time of issuance of Class C Permit, the project shall again be reviewed by the Urban Development Review Board. The project has been exempted from the requirements of the Metro Dade County Shoreline Development Review Ordinance (Metro Dade County Ordinance 85-14) by letter of January 17, 1986. The Atlanta Office, Federal Aviation Administration has no objection, if the height of the building plus antenna is $99' MSL per letter of February 7, 19861 thm Oadm County Aviatiaw DeOartme"t kes mo ebjeCtiam if the hmi*Q M tism s4a:ea t a'.. & mussom c. tam 'ft,- -"fto yr v a.o .%. I* U C lip e a) U 0 U_ 0 a CU G tj U� Cil , F a 0 0460, R 130796M M 3TEA DEVELOPMEN PLAN FIGURg.� i Mwo FIGURE 2 KC• JUt 3 o.J �� 1. •+• Ii ` .®.rrr.rrrrr sr•«rrr7r ti rrarrrrrN • r..rrarrr 'rrrrrrrrr V C rrrrwrYrr _ �? M " •_rsrrrrrr it C �. rw.wrrrrr7s () �� wrwrrrrrwr • ••,y C _ •rworrrrrr 11 i rrrr77Mrr�r { � C� lL + ••". U •7 � r_•rerrrrr . ♦ � . r• rrrrrrrrr rr..rsr.r. .•• y •. � •�' Ci • rr.rrrrwrr � .. . � . \ a � C .1' �•v�.rrrrrr 4 rei.rrrrwrr . " U \ ............ ' • ' rr7.Nrr rrw y • .. rOwNYrrrw �SS ..-+ ro7rww7+rw. t{ i COMM •iNrr CO W •� •���/r '• 1 rr�� MASTER 31TE PLAN, =_ 'f' -�• "�'' ,• r• ' 81SCAYNE PLAZA �.►•i: `'.: M.yr:.�i.:�::6�7✓ ...• •�.. Je:.. ....��•`, LYE �:�.,.�r:�::.•.',, ,.+ _• 9 i Zu �:. f i WIRE 1 off W. I -QT � BISCAYNE PLAZA SOUTH ELEVATION SOURCE:ADA i i. Iran T I ko 00-1131 CLFYEW FIGURE 4 4T DE&('0 R)R THE t-% IXWWOM OR BFLMATM RAW SYSTEM « w . V t CMOrM sc tro at. I i�i I l r�� " •�.r• %act: Fnor. Sr•nnr� Sul)mitted into the public record in connection Ivi h item Af�01 Walter Foeman City Clerk rtuA ►+or(t I 0 _:t c.� O 00. 1137 .. • . •.�. • • • 0 • ' O fir, • • •_0 T 11 ��-IIIiP •• i�pill- V � Cn �� I.ww+r. • ..� ANY �r �. f�.. Y.•M.•w11w 1•.IIIw...1 WIw •..I. r.. _. .. . -w•.1 A./. 1wIM. • �", Su' itted into the public record n conneCtion v1/i h item on /crri Walter Foernan City Clerk E FIGURE e PROPOSED APPLICANTS MODIFICATIONS TO THE 1-95 ,'• DISTRIBUTOR BIFURCATED RAMP SYSTEM DO MTOWN SHOVNNG T}E a AOOED APPM—Oa REC01.%Er>= I MPROVEMEWSLr- n1 1 1 1 Irw•�. I I � 1 •� l Ilr (�IJ '� • I fit ji t MRM►aw s0 MIOKKIR o1. TI �Ov1CrOtt tq SOLACE: ACO. SFRP1- I.' 1 i i J i l f1t1 I A-6 11 0- C cu U a� .Q LL a U W O � O R_ T` j O C/3 tLl Een .=;weoe om 1•.,0 •ul/" fawn no Maw 1 oncrn• oaR •"wr vo•�n•rt�q• w 1 19g6 i9ee o r • • e r • r • • • •fo ■ • • r r • • • • • • o. nw uw la • Oar Iw. lei R �•Id: iRomas�� I r+•81 �Imrns r Irsuf v oaoll•Icls W09 ' 1990 1w4�W 1_ f8 n." oOu•11q�7 t1J11+ I O7df10� !t Ofalgr O Opq�}p a"wrfaw 0,8 moro4 U OAOrrpr �• I miorY'9 /.•.8,4►,4r1 man" laf, •f�88�, 8t•. p�,88f,888. opiprnbq 1,4, ODrdTOr r u. w,�., n. �.. rw.n•. ► •LIUU•Arr. 884•• mn•.r4�aea m+ns.r •n •1 monra•• m.rw,a more • nGURE T MIAMI CENTER I/ ONE OUpOHT P._VA nMEIjNE 00-113'7 Suh„litted into the public record in connection Wil-h item on .lam Walter Foeman City Clerk b on o0•�MK•Tf or OOMOWCI rr 81 - O mOr•ulTrO•�rO; 1991 COiorrOl•Ar, q• m.•nor • t�. arnrr•r • 1[rQUMRMr O MW grvo o®w01 a. on A v".M a a row urw a awn•. �.ralo •OR nrs rpn d nt ir aOpl a„p,c . am s rrr n.Uraw R/•rrrpn 1 04c'MC70 Sttlt0 ' 4ich t/rye•I lee IA.c. •tetlN •. - - e44910 Iv.+elre 16,40C I.eN ec•c1e1 - Cli.•• MMhN IgMle 1 _••Mhe 4t.•• eeM. IMee"4401 Gw.• eN'te'Nr 'tq.eeel• t•'Mh1 heeh•.ere• v'p111 Iti.N/• Polo.Cis belief tleelo .ee.s IMIce -wel .. INM Orec••w•,1 e�•re•110e.e.e Kl.+ee � 00,wellNl• to .�. Nrl Meet e•1c.r1• Fr�l.r. IYlete e1°'!'e.e1 � Ir/IIIv1 /NO I., a•ses•1. st'4-0ee10e /Iceells ee . See 6,8N1 Gtglee0 r11ve #us $,.Mo MR' AtN• 6..e.ee• IMed olowl ow.eoleler v1100'40e thwess epee• e.t.► —' 1►eve elev . N. 44.60 IGeel ��'y olelllN Le IMlvay qwH 0 e.11• teeUN. IMeee IOh1 s Cat" .KUVs fie. I,•... l ~ �. Glllye s•r.hc.M.N. Il►eee.•.c 11 ea 1.i C.eecarees •s.M IO.t ee•+.el . . Ca111ete1011446 fleece es1/1.ete.el _ te*worl" vetoes e.Woc., IIII.v Me....e.1 CNllehee. up., IOe/l I.e►oM1 owl's e.e.Ne.• help. w.el . ce"14 N.ovey Ise11 el••.•e.l AhNe eglee legs' eel.ele.1 ' Cattle 81►/Nee twew eee.v/ /rlMt•s lehclelve Kelly ele.1 GNe peNeel6 IGNeI /e - ltiAeq 1w4M 0'ee""" 1". I/e..eeeNl Merl Ie/ls/s• e/1e00.9Nllle /4eegv cvN•w.el � MO•e"ee eem1111e• Kv.•.e. Ir I.p.l• SwIllv00 .•1le omit. 0, . �.1e1 Cee•4I. ee.el•1• IIIe•e ells Nwl IepNs eeMe.e 0-e1•eevN s �. n+e.N lei• - M INe.e..c• 14et• l�''•e•Kv Cei•t..e►I/1�./l.lh..y Isom''--& IIe.eIM •h/e..p - ~~I II./h1.Ne�• IlM elhlMh IMvO I.M Ile' R Cln.c y,rllhllM Mry 11..1 .. 4weI1M e.•.11l 14.e �wl11..1 -e SuLN'9litted into the public ' record 'n connection with item on 121L,41cw 00 ` 113 7 Walter Foeman City Clerk F•.IIh. ee•...s INN sdl . - _ ssr/ lore lo••. s.s hr rN1�w11M «•. 1'1w•.1 • 1 _ • /M• �e"N0..11 - .�. ,. . � iw1.1w oe.tlw K�.11w1 Aw�Mowl. wy.•11/ too ek...11„ 1 teem Poo hRe•Ilrsas s/.�we fLs•r144,84 Arllorw 11/16c1w/o I1•.•... M cool Poo" 11/cts. �•►ls.r/1 U11[41tir r11••..w.• /on..1s Mach Irco.«N Dow. MM e/rNsw 0116• loy..ol..0.1• Wkr gMgrehl s.ol - otser• sa'M• Nod .. . lywt.lorle a qs+o• lilh ese�r...1 �y...l IlgHtr• slogs 1c ss/ M.1 . lltwoo lel..& 1411 Ikorlel Aolsktlw tyle K46.. es1M` 066.0 eo . ... 1 ltwlo IsWd ttk.N• .W 1+.1 pM.Nh Kayqp My! ^1 Ilewl. s1e! Ilk.sle l.b! 1.ro.y repose is. 0 .. ' _ 1 l/.lk.. M•/..Mls 10114 1...rMel a /wwN N•s• IArMI« 1f a .. 11.I1.1•IUll4w sell, IZkdo "go, i.h1.N• .1.e•� $vssl .• s s•.1 Wre Jlw.tb food � Wis. tAasole • .... rMr ILw ��cn1+t —. . .. Mlki•�•is. l•se Nlwl.w 11kM1e1 M p•1 l4460• MINT •l.s O .. Aw borwo le"A"al 1 •..l•fM 1Mks Recto ,. .., 14rko trllaro 1{o.ly.e a ow1M1 1..r1H1 1.N.cIN M��`ek1kM ske,.s1 H 61-18 stolw/d IJ.rwN.. /yrol le.r.s 1awNw 11ire«I . All.ceorw Nw�.' Il•Il•. F�•t I.W l�syoe!• �lrr M`rllo erw, s•«IIo wyol .' . - slams IS." sl..l ' le.k, Ms.1 hrMw sw.IN1 aft"P1... . M.w «116111 11lose DWI vwwllosr. /les.ss le.N •I.w .111N /1 w, ew Nw #" .lose NM 1►r ley. e1• 11kr1.. ly.t.! �- Fluio. N.ty.ld Ilw.k. h+e11 , lerl— woo. Is►oke sa.1 . ti ® ►1M.1. Iw 11..110 IMMI10 ts.e.y.w .A.N. l.tie...e1o. MM.1 SuNnitted into the public record 'n connection with item on _L-2 v ®0 ` 113 �/ Walter Forman City Clerk . Cw/w leo. 11•I.N 11.e1 40410pe ml.mq.e ua.nle ml«/o «hMMeee tieGe.rV Irelte W04168 . ecel/lee ./16ell.e0 /ONe.I•NI OP "as gleam IMre1M tool eoKelle Me. Ill.~ M/ w11MM ealkfll 0646011• mb-e limp. 11•e11 CreMti� ww...e IMw pp1i1 . 4NoiM li�ee �I.MrI Cge.l� ap10•cb I�Iq eymrcrl rlhl. O.rl• ItDerlpe.p Iw►el Cafe+/• ••Nw• MN 6.n1! hpb l.erl• 4.1W 14 .1.6 p/1.M1 Mrerp. Ilm.. 14N•M Iw/ Igrl• 1e/eIM fl1e.1�• lye•c•1 .BSI ._ bleele q•.• eel. M}rlel /.rw/Nr• •eFgel• I/NrIM erlsll � .... AeKerre recer.Ne ItiY•IN 11 iK4.le )eeN. wow few, J eMelwlllw Ire. Ib,q«.Ill.el 1 6-4ke /Lc.1K IMNIed (8 _ I&w q 'e `e/Mle ecdl.r♦•111e Ite.e111ereo I�•e1U'Neem Ike.lol•.". IMe•wpl - �l'reeeel.m letlM q•cwIMr11 11-swill Iloilo - MMrcMe. Ile... 11.1M IIU11 - GIIIe.Ie ►wpicy.el• 1�1er11 pr.eerler IeMlol loins te111cecM ..r k«e Ift..rk« N.d l�..ee . . �ti Mt• «/� slide$ Ce mp11 rMkr.oe Ike.mel e1ee1 w/bM14e Muslim "hw% ' C/eNe .mm.• ICw/IN me.11.terl . - Cows1�•n. alp• ':tppl.l Illeletw /'•eaeMaeleas /M o.., Or►aeN.t..e kw ICA"I.p - 1}e«KMIIe INIIN/eP Ilm/rr. lJIIm1 1 ' Clods-1{•.►eppl lose ellrrpe MNMetell . . CML... .e. Ire./.. IOMe..I Ile. w�Ilerl• leweme M..r1 r.ee� e.Uel Cent. M e. e[l.. IL... sm'" We. "mr" go- I". r.00rW .1..1 p,./p, ®0.6 ,,nn Cr♦�t�M •.t t.p W1aM ISol— 6.16....wo V1 irKleeK..m loss eoerl he I.M NNe Mesa../ oIM rlewl !et♦1.1e M1«elm /Jeep./. ,. Sulbmitted into the Public ' record n connection vvih item 5Oil �W 00 --113 7 Walter Foeman City Clerk A/•M�e eeelllefr If►•yrfyl - Leeerw a1.Yye..o•a...rlr IJe.lad fe•1/►w se.1e•ees Iff.r. y..e/Ye . I•Freltet.le I-sw mev- 1% isel le.•er •1/•oMe fA�l Ie.ee.ef l�•erA.•e.eleeeN baerl IeMe►el - llptaw ,/,/,a M►leeel INI+e e.etrl• Ie,111/ Oer1e . •1Ps1..1.e• Me�t.e Iflgeee NM/tr/ Miler le seelllltrr Ifeee/.tre1 •y+lte t••IN• IfedMr.... Owe$% OefO. II �erNgl• ee.lealtrefe 14•I. e.•.1 r O Ient•eege. Jy-1t..• Ile.... °ree•f M�e•N YMIeHN I/y. .1 - H•.w .Nrellr Nwe.•. treHU A«e•rle Met Nei fetwee, °L�1 ft,l lee..Iw „°,e 141eee■• WIMe.►�1 PI... •11 NeM .tr IH/ feeee l�eA eewl/ /Nel • 11 •eYeUlw p•.•/Y.•e" IMecMeMl Merle M/. Iltepl/rll "-,tweet ee/•evee.e• Istlf.tr etMl.l ikv ti•••e�le Netewel..el• •'tR rt. /. —• . lelle ..10w1 SUL mined into the pi_ihlic record onnection with item Oil OW " 37 Walter Foeman City Clerk .•Ile •rlsMe /r.Me. IN•e�f.1•^ e�..1 �.Ie Mei•e•Ieell• Il-le./ Hey ' IW/NN Ir.y.y, f•Yw/e Nw•�1 Il..ler./1 I68.0" 141•..t1 f•.•oIA1� el•..• Itellw "awl .. _ streets ee.lee.e "he "&we . J••+•e•N sMe.•N 14n f.a...q s.L.eee ICMN4•.e••a1 C. J•e•ery°le •eesetr IhMYAIe, J•.1 eee1�. 11.i1 e\•'�erNe •YIr Iel ^. • �"�e•Ne OP.* Klesl •erl - Ieraeb Neeee IJe'MIp1 N Melaeley.,.r . j•..MMAr 14`eM•eh �e..j.tP, to IM. McNe1eN Is" e0.1 . °M•e+ •.Mwtt� IleMery •eetr.a Jess. M ee—am J•eN fier". IO�•NI J�IIe.//r♦ hre IMI/ 6ee.1 10 Mt. • -.e le low M fester SOW 7'. IL:. cc,, ►+rt{ . tan plOna •.we, A04104 ))+71 K(.' �079��50{'3 ,. HOLYWELL .. A{r. Neward Cary - ,: .•+r ... :1r) ,:r �•+ tiCity Manager CITY OF MIAMf .. ..... �.. .. _ a,... -�' r 3300 Pan American Drive .., ~•� °_' ''T Miami, Florida 33133• - - Dear Mr. Gary% - • The Holywell Construction t:ompan, 'and ,'Mr, ?heodore Q.. Gould �. -,i"Develaper'9 hereby submit for your cons:)eration the 10110wtng proposit' for the temporary use of the south -end Dand :: a etl •esof bayfrunt Park- - •� The City of Miami ("City") grant% loper C:u iiclusive use - of the Bandth_ll area of Oaytr•.nt Park as ellttined on 1:xCibit Air--- attached here to. y`t 2. Develooer agrees that no 'batch mg plant" will be erected on said i property, and that the pr-perty %vill.be .sed to park eonstruetiom trailers and pan;tn-. for the emp::, was of Developer, its j • r:'- contractor, sub -can tractor%, all% rates � nj related entities. - 3. The term of this ACrcelncn9 0%All commence on 7uly I, 1)SI and an Fet.ruary 2l, 1932, both data% inclusive. j ) C end U Tom?? "' •. In eonsideratiun UWCOf, Dcvclo� :r aC.rtt46 tat CL Q _ s.. (a) Pey to the City a monthly sum •+t Five Thousr.-W Dollars . (55,000). saltl sum to be paid -to the Trus. Acsounl estabti:hed for the Rcdcvclop,rlon- of Co,:ront Park; = 0 r (b) Pay -ill cost: for the dcmoi:t:on and r,-troval of the esistlra Oond%IIcN; U 0 Vl {`f� G (e) Allow the eontimicd opera ion of if pal::irl; lot lo:itad on mock 2 of Dui'unt Pura; •• - � =ice . - (d) Pence the peritnrter of ;,tid nandchell ails• an•I prov;C: �. o U / •' - security pr.r%Mlllcl to pats •1 taid arcl'On a full-time, 24- (1) iv hour -Jay basis; �•' •• •�•.�."iw•i�I�..�' •i ice.. •{:��.�.��Y.:: .�. Via. �. � ....=•, .)..� �'`� 1 1 �,J I { 120 3. The Developer further agreeS that: • (a) No trees will be removed from the Park area except as may be necessary to demdlish the f3andsholl; _ (b) No part of Biscayne Boulevard, or -Biscayne :Boulevard way - . will be closed to public traflle, except, when necessary, Chose portions where easements exist to Install er Service - _ - •- :Utility lines, storm '-Sawers, telephone equipment and -such - other under•xtreet work as may be necessary from time to y ! •- time. �; 1' .mod 7+• . w �•.. ' j;� ..•' it �• �. The City Iof 'AAiaeni and Daraloper��agram • to enter into negotiations for the funding of ti fountain In ;hq _prgpascd 1:•:. - Noguchl Park. In the event an agreement Cronef Mt fee ached regarding the -funding ofsaid fountain, Developer cat that, atbsewent to the expiration of the Agreement, 'and at the request of the City, ►t will sod the area described hgIeir6 Upon Ya+r acceptance of this Agreement, Developer and'CIty will be bound by the terms outlined above, for the term herein Specified. Sincerely -yours,• wtr t 1iOLYtVCLL C:VSTRUCT7OY COMPANY j Theodora 0. Colllu/ldldd�•TP• ;. Agreed to and Acctptcd: �S7 • _ City of Miami GTY CLS4r' art l" award ary City Manatee • .G:t�tt :r. A•�tI-•�•.I4��i��1F?���^'��:+�i��'1': *'i�7J: 1 58 MWWWMW 731 C- 0 ^^a `J 11_ +� U ^+ p a a Ct7 C 0 — V` -0 (5 C _ p OG L— f i • • • 140twrlu cOr•1AhQ�..' •• d 1•uA.n lwiiI04 UU1 r 0I1. I /^�a1 Jr C 5015 HOLYWELL : .. y_2a, l�u. j honorable mayor Amur ics Terre CITY Cf* MIAMI } 3300 Pan Anariean Oriels P. O. ao: 130701 Allnrl, Florida )3133. - PA I MY7122,11 PAWL Dear Mayor Ferret I have recently reviewed the.most current Naguchi design for aayfront Park and, in general, agree with the overall elan$, Including the moving or removal of the existing library bui;ding. i This fetter is to inform you that f am prepared to provide the materials and to construct that por:.on of the Naguc►:i design 1 - adjacent to Chopin Plaza in the south erg of the pirk. No•.sver. this - Commitment to provide the materials and constructian is U contingent upon the City moving forward with its plant to v redevelop eayfrpnt Park .and some modifications to the performan,e Plaza at the south end of the Park, which modifications would be N C� T•� subject to our mutual agreement and approval. CL ;t• U Q fl. V •t' � � Sinc rely, O YadurY f1. Cauid Ul _ T=Igah +•• act 30e Carol I* - vice Wyur O Cvunissionst r?ucelrfo 114rea. C? Ccmnissioner 3. L. 1'lunrer CornniisIan&r Millar OW-Ams Roy F. Kenzie - Wvnlo.4% flovelapc,•,it AathJl , ly r .J. • �� . • A-13 +��7ai?wiw.:�1�4>_��.r.::v�►�--t. i�r•s-''..,r.n:e•.'v. ..:•:�y.:.i:.d+►�. •.--��—... VCR K� � ��ocso �r ,rub► ate' : _ e �r jIN4v, s��•� - �e men ee ^' a••rN+sw A Iaret Joft eve 20 Mar 1985 cc � me. Theodore Oould.-C'evier aI partner. / Miami Center Limited ►artnership fe G:u►,:�,� 300 Miami Center 100 Chopin Flags I' Riamt. /Lerida 33131 Dear Ted:. _ The Miami City Commission 1s presently Censidoring whether or not to proceed with the present plant far th! relevslepseat of paylroat part. These plans would involve the removal of the former li.brarr building and the full devolossotlt of tk* roiuchl plan. At 0 P last ■eating. Commis/oAe/s expressed Concern over the amount of private funds commt•tted-to.the :redevelopment -effort since the funds raised to date fall for short of these needed. In t962. during as earlier debate ever .the fate of the former library building. t attempttd to Indicate to. the commission the 1 scope Of private sector commitments to the part rodevelOpeent 1 program. 1 read late the record your letter of July 20. Igo2. which Indicated that you wore. 'prepared to provide tits materials an9 to.tonstruct that portion of th! MOguchi design adjacent to Chopin plaza at the south and Of the part.' 1R1f Commitment was contingent upon the City moving forward with its plan. ,V S= C Tou►,w(Iliwgness tt assist us in our fundia4 •nd uastructfoa [ a) effvres. of tour;*. come after several at:, a s with the designer Q F� (D U ii and st111 rA0 altered their deflSnf /averse times prior to �, meeting with your 11p*evaL: The City Aas altered its plans far the South -end of the pert to Complement the Miami Center project L U and we would now like to proceed with Implementation. <D � _p G r- CO. A lot of progr?ss has been made is funding payf►ont part and we e = U - . •re much closer to our goat of full funding. t need your help — 0 nor.ia moving this project forward. Although you have taken no action to date on 1 •�' your offer to assist us v th part dc•e1oo•tw-, � we mould hope that you would now come forward to help make this —• project a reality. The M1e■i City Commission will hoar this C34 :.l •atter again en May 23. Tuur willingness to honer your commitment would go a long ray to helping us reallaa this crucial UO E .project. Sincerely. pa"Ice A. yarre ee:. Commission /lembess r"_s ::-'•=-'7C=�'L :.: �� ...:1��t•; ter„•..:.:��_"' 1 60 33 I HOLYWELL CORPORATION l'::vbd'�.�:.L•. 1'u C;.mw �: rw; ..+71 I' It'.. I:...�,I w�;) :". :�� 1. � lauu 44s, ��dlr, 1;m; r..� _.�•'I _ ; E.nan P. '+ins.y, Esa. ' .: � /•V. d:l:kell Mve'T.e miimi, clorlas 33131 ae: 3aafronc car. . Cea: Ethan: It nss been brought to any attention that the City mOmn+fnoatlons for the Affw4ea Qevel0oment application i.3.'s prMOSea 915Cayne Dlaia =Jett to be oevelrol: is t^e '.nh•:I:• pu:cnaser of the nmainae: of the larw on Tract 0 inclV7? ivnvemsmts in eayfront Park. I und!rstand that it has CY^- ►:21/mrell Corporation arc I agreea to cont:izute fl,'G^ 'r ^ ._ ;-t reoevelooment or Sayf:ont ?ark. This allegation is false as t-! corresi*wence an3 transcripts of City Commission hearings intl-ates. Holy-ell's ooligation .as limited to cr:vl:ing soj f:; •-e za-:s,,?_ arcs. It is my recollection that in :a.-ns:y, 1133, .,en ��:,.•:; Corporation or000sh to resod the bamisnell iris, Mr. Gary sent .N a -..'._. soscifically instructing Moly.ell to refrain from piscl-q so_ cn - _ bano"ll area. The so-called E1,000,0Ju con::lzutlon ooes nit exist. In July, ayd-', ►+olyrell offereo to otoviae the materials a--j :. cznst:uCt the portion of the saa'n,cnl design adjacent to Chopin Pla_a is a unllantnroplc tax ot7ucti2n prcoosal, suoject TO the City )f a9i aracee0ing im- oists;i .::n its plans to rloeveloo 8ayfront o.yr<, years nave elapse: ina conditions nave cnanged. wily*.l co*$ not nave a nee: for tax deductions. Moreover, ►Mly.eil jots not have an interest In 1 l+ i Miami. i �9 51�.erelr r ors, f fit Theodore B. Cflu10 � 1 { attachments cc: asseli Birth Sergio coeriwez '4iller Oa.kinS �I �3y 00-1137 ale .4 III.Im t— Ago 4Msa else NN .K SIC sa. N It Sees fdc goec we.• ••A+.ae NII N n A4 Ala come. ad AA. /«K.. . NN Ntt .K ale a.� , Co." tl.e.m Iego{e aAm.maa NN a111 MC AK w.....e.e Ita H.-.« e.e.a, I..I.." d a~, f o to 60"10j Nee also AK AK 1..1 pall. Ad6". A./ . W/s, go. AaN«a t~a-• aA•la..l a111 Gall AAC w.a a" Go"". C.•+�•1 a•eaaN alll a l awl sal ta.wal— ta.e.w Coy IlaNiy. Cy14a/1~ a.N aM Co- aa.a«1y. A1..a1eM A««ela e M If.ala allo at11 ,I caaae c{..{y co• o.1 c U..aaal ta.•1..M. eame/e.A I.s A.1a! aNe UN � .1 M•.41U4a )-..... w... A..4.go a.a-rNal N..l m« Mel I..." ell/ lat It".a haea Mn AK oft." If..a.1a. • 1.« tee, afl, yCt /a.a160 • IaeaaA tw.4e. °,11-I /tat C'�°Nat7»a Ito° . too" N.►.er and Sago«I tooaswNl.. 11-Al.. 1_.e. al•-a41 .., ant war ,f. A{a ly, Nor. M•a{y. goad •a.«N INI le t�•..a Ha., go1C 'y �'M ICI, Aye e...a•., sale. 4L..•s, goad shoa.4 Isla •e..a 1-){y ad a.a. es...-... tee M a_�•aq Iye 1... tA..alt{.d a a wi.e ~a«M .e.. er ••..+..r at ram.•••• .N.Ni.-, eNleago, yy.M1., 6. •••ago, 1K .W a.". We A..•.a 1.. A....q, INMe1 -. +M�..�,,� � aN•' MNM.a. .N•M, a -A Ste ,we . goa •L.Ne...la.{/{.A . Subnjitted into the Public record n item cof�nection L1�it1 .� Walter Foeman City Clerk sec aws qe.. �+•i 6♦ lase1*1 I y °. lob AM I//1 Alto" W .y 4a "d f~ie{e. e�i..{« t% qr. rem L'-L 4ApAtle..y IsaOe 7L la tir.a4.. f.1a.e ini431 °� Vlle. a." 411,•..N ar.a... a Ms a•••.e go... Awe 1.11 e.e. elf. � V. �.+.-a V�a•. /...•. a a•.. 6... Mee 17M t/N y. C.N a loss. t-.ee.4 taft Mte. 184i8 44 9460064e� c w Imo. tb tow a #.G" a" ��..�.... logo y ' e.e°~N« a...d Iti'm. •.ly4e. +""'r..•; L•.. n4 1a CA•ra..M d7... tale hM lr SOUtNa Ago...- Ca 01-4 CA•eafe -4 A.. a...„t. hn Alt Sic 4r e.e.Aa- C•.M.a• ,: • NII Nn aft, a.d ps �.a{s � aR MN e.eea.{.a A/Mo.Ca .H go,,N/e 141 INA41.� . waif we4f a.«, Ant net Aq No.a1 e....IrM te�Ca�� eN r.q..ta...0 .rtoo�a un out Avolve NOW acid MI out rupAM }." do.001 seek. I-..11o... 1 A.ele 0-4 Joel t�^� MIN MICC4.o ad ,I/ago.. iv4 •Is tAls NN toe. 4eA Ago.. VIM. ll"7" %1&,'" pow.Wes l '-'ado :eat Not O"s Ile 1st Pop" C... {".. a.•, L..M M -1 a.l. logo. plles for ea/ MW %so j AI.,.....y •w A 864 No C—.l.. Igo..-4 4 y.wW. I.e.w Net Nt war ow•A•+.a �o a° - tIC owes• 990" M0dp1.e - - 1 /606 1001 1K .•. •Mess IpN I••t•/Ms1« rate N.N«t felt Ce,.., .. I.A..• C•«. Lye, NAO DMA 1111 es"" rMee• - .. w N.O •..11..y I•r•. w I•. e0{ « h•o.•N y 0.«I ei1N Nq \ Ow• \'I•r C« M rf \ 0/.Io.e• Ilse r D 011 o1got*"0.•iwoaels, ti .WrN. MI{e\Iy W hW/y O.A11MJy \ hWly 11M IIAI t \ Ie.N.e e....•e go.. 1 •V'•'e 0.•t..•e. 0%.p M• NSA• GILA" its" IAFiN IMeee w h W ey Iles t /•Net. site fell DJ{/ft Ie/•et tru1.1 hI••e•\. less« s.eerNbl hW W«• 0r0 Me•N I•f. Us\yeee\le Is" NII S. •1 h0w•ye C•«y C••Mj•� 1••M.. Cry., re ►001 • o0a\q 1awl Cy.w/y w road. hWe.e - CerNN1 Pei-". Ce•. . V%I Inj At Jet 11 •• \Ile• .. I•A01 w Mews•.•f CN0 1.4 flea . ►MI poll No"" not"me r.•.Ie11 owl..* N. Itsl set tw•.ye r•01 w ON.. I,y 0«•f4• d••• sett DIN •IIMO) o1sMC Ie.eAlAro er1 0.\IN\Iy tew.Ite1 delft•. or1 lbN.• I:N } IIwAOy •0i.«N W 0.•w_.. M•••.w N• Ns•••« !Ne rlLwo 0..•\W4 t •0 ••C b1«e1 ref\ /ree•1.{y IYI I Qi•0 use. w oi•OU . 4.0 i•1.• C." I«OAwe.•. •01h.s..ie.1 loll DIIA • A16.110w ON.Ie• 1!M At tiAl• G •, NeNN• .. 4.. 0«414N loft 1•If I•e11t1 :-0-e levee«le NSA•«• fe•.•10006 Iw •«le Ie.eeltOlt, qC 1'N 1 •1 I.1 1 II«sewel \.0011•• Sees.., ItdnO N, rt .. .... NII 0RA NwONe, 0e.0.01•N, t rw••e/Jt `0{w. w r••'wle«N.AI. IYI essl tD N••;'• �e•.e0•AIR w 's loll QA •es•.ess 1WANN \.Ay 1/11 ass• • • r t.d oy Iwlue lAwO I••rNN, Mw I /l r.ee0 ease. f1••hersN lw�N•1 • ;. Io. tert c. u.A«N efw es1. IIA.•• Ie.f••0M C•e«{e I"-**. 0 411.1«N Iq•. • • ,h ••w0•W N••1 r..a free w w N..1 o.u..w CeN3. Doll .. !I/1 fies•ei.01 hro..y •41N - left 11.1 a Na•. y1eN Nwl fas ;.'N.,r. very.. f.Nl.�he. w •.\.• 0 �. NM t0 ieale t�0 \«0•le•N I.1•re.M4.1 h•0««lew 11}I • t 9•00 IeN I•WNe I . �Q c; IMI Ise•• yY w 0eya leb.e•el •, •y •M lOMbll•C We • �••IIet+N !•s.. I••+I•IN flw0 I•wb w.. t .� }G� )M! e1e.►I• CNweN 10e.1e100 to .8 , M10W. w C•els.sl« Ilp loll IIN I • vet f'•Mwt f4I0w e.W \.10.J.6�0/ 1..0 1 ey IMI 4en - h•/r•«1-0 1..1aee At1e.e J4••t•, tNle►{y Cl••se, IIN D a w er1..•.t�e tw C+.ArN• h.•.t0•.• .1 U..••.w f•J••.t IMA Cora NIIw7.0 Mb, W A.•1.0s• . MNeel W Me•r . bs•N '•o •0 0h.1••.... loss hu" - h.s.e.., C-01.4. "aMye !•1 NC h I.{•A W MNM I••ArN •P••Nlw like I ,rt :Nee•w0 N.NJy w o.fi•..� !41 tern 0 a. "a rw tAwN•I. INI one �� +.•a. •I I...b••... qW� IN• NA ICNI 1w/ C..•.. WC -• Me• w wO,rq•q�..iw.g00«. IN llrg �•.•,,Creole NwM..iWw•./1e{•. f,•.s Cy«• i. C«e•1.1 sole 1••wulal we•w Ntf r •Ly.w he0.•t• •••••e l.I1 INo IrRe• OINy..w bssJNNss I.uNiM IIM wI0•ew ere w t•eely. INC We1ye W C«..1..• IN/ Jssl W y.N•N«•1 Owleef•. tot ACM.{.•• w Nd.•.• !NI _ - 1f•Imew ae"�Y .• �w.1..•... 'e• C•.r.. w •1:.•..,. be-de1 w I••.W.y ssel loss aw tyl«N•e t.M•'I I•A O IMI INI • N«AA.ee.y • e► 4.1•••w. ee..� •, 1.••.., Ne foe«{y.J, C.tw• N.0 l..yA 0 t�••.. el 0.•trNl•y •..I l.iei• y I•.�A.N• N AI/•. 101/ o I 0.us1•.e yl.r{y ••W10 O.N. w Cee l" IMt IIN t rOMep IW....w o...e•J.. D••.4 e Ole -;el« M.•..y ••' • or,sief !N• o AJ.N M..e sae. -4 C..-" :.a- .1 I.O.«•.e Cr1. � ey IN0 1:11 oe- •.rep 0.0r..• ti0./ ti •►..1 tw �4'••• M. . F/e ■.II .w.lAeNw INNle h.•.00• e.1: In. Nos ewe.1 M 1...•e•. s..„•. :«Ma 00 --113'7 Sulb.milted into the public record in connection Wi h item on /ov Walter Foeman CityClerk J W 09 lK 4r• II..o �.0•.1..10. •N 1►l1 �A bN•. Il.r..l Ilwlle. -lam It..l• tot•. b4oe...w Ml% lo!. K.wll U/.wr lw t tool...• ON" s— l M ".1.. lt•1 t.M" /4e tm� /11• •oI S. .•' Mll Nq tr\ ta.vw l••l.o•., lac t.o..IN N.• w br•1 f•JI••I 0ev Ie•. •W t..rp t'Nwv low• .y"° l.•...•M/ +�I b«Ilorloo to— too«. I••oo.. �' NIl /IY�wI tl.N1y 9e.4wo 0.14 to w NM Ibis l0.••1 b«, w.y. tN.6.6. w,.•. n6l ~~R 111 �o•ee.MN • 0•.— �' f- + .*•boo .1 Iol.«•.N �..Mr•r I.1. lots krl t111g1 0uwp «�-- - IN•l.«.l M walwl M•1 n1� tww � w l �. IoM.I� I•••.I "ft l �.•o...•y oats Nee "Low" r�l.~oo. look Ivor•. bIl1.M• w hio. - .l to.. 11••l not n" tr,r� rrr M1Ml«.•...• t•«e.+• �•.. •«.w �•, We t I t..qR tlo.l 0.6N I►.l 01v0. ur o,"'" .oN •, lot cl...l.l..y MO twrw tl•1•M was w b...... 1►bl /lrl I••IN•MNed lNN w s..p..1. lvf t�.Ir L.•.. IN I..l.e t tw.p. IN " lb ,%... f.wl�w+•r M` t«� .Iwo l 1�.•w�:a.�o~:N b./!. bmI rl�l I.N., l.a•. N•..., IMNI. w 1.+... t'.. w N..1 ti•l/y. not INI ■ t.� � hrvl. .� �•l w Mt Aft &�. i' .. N...l"p..ar�w., . INv t.Mp M•o•...e Moovlyo •4.N N.o.l•lo. MI ItN 1•.! t...pr I iie•/«we. I."we, ry«o. • '' e•1«• 1i b'l'.'q• \...r \1•.r••.N. N11~ . t.Mw ll« A colo Y MIA:M• llNly, &"st.6 I. e.0 M«• ball AM« tkis~� �1I .\ NIMw W L.Ad.,iw �.•!'�H•Y �•�r..l«w�! MIa Mq t.0ow Co.r.y,\..•o./y w MIIN Ie:1 t �+w. •Iwo•««. Mo«. y...«.• b.•1 M.oia/.o boos...• llt Nn tom" 1•�,.I..N WN. 30 MN ' It01 +...,... Iw l•r11 lw., tc l•v.••. -4•..e.."s... Wa to t,.lr� I"Mi•l 4--". tle.0.4. I«lo• .. l o•ir. b•...eo . innle n11 .tN.M Nam••. I.., .M No. l/14 TrI{y. .. - 1««00l I-a.N•w \ylo•., Mc LIr t1• a t..0� \NuN osl �N W«.. :� «I;. l.i•,•..}. M•./..««. w . ItN t..rrr 4.�0rew.I w \ c.•M %"a—. 0616 ��.� \1«.•M b"•.i..• w to.o•ir a.1Lw I•.•«•• 6'o'"l bmlrr.. nll bill t.l•wr l I— 6 Gao M. tgilt..i. I••.1•...1•.. 0alw•I w \ tot Iles two tt>M bw.yl. •wNs..e, list n1I Mle� _ O.LNoN w.a....ww \M , o...t/ NI 6101/ 360 MNOi..-Io. v. Ml y. Aolo.. 1111 t.•qI Io.w.". w r....N \ lol.ol•i•1 brel tip W /N.a./ 4"". two.•. � \e•�NMt. 0y:o0•i.l, • bMl \•...., 1•«/..~i.'•«.1 No,\.•. Nellw., w MN t"" w I•teliV /www l.e/r.w •.o•s nrI tt.R 11o..w boos.. blot Iw.ly l0«.Ir /NI llq..0 �•llo.lw 61.N 1'•l I•.1..•.1 . lilio / bl.•alw• lM. t� /w10. U..N I.•.1 4-W 0«e w I—N. 11~bl.. tot lot t..q t.M" 1......y b.• 10" IMI n.. Rtw0 !1\e w 1.«ww....1 l•lr.•Id Ib1N 0 "•w 1..1 4v...o•1.. 01A,q tbo l•.•.rloo I\wpo.y .,j�yv.w.,o.•• IM• t•.•w t..vl0 • �. N Io«• I.i.0.M twle ~i1i�0 Oo.Ns. le.o•l go go t,w,rl Ml...l"N.i IM.o.o4 w bI«.0 6."oo I111 INI N..e.�1 .� b.r i•O r••li...t. tt /•.. I•..«/. b.•w,q NI! MNlle. t�R \I«/iioy y.MMe 1•r✓ioNr Me .I.w I••r/1• •..••r.. r....«..y M/I /,w• N.w I M•..r•.. w l•••• IW •..• not It$ ... M•e,•.• �.. e.w. �•.•• l•.we.... r•«etw. A..IW N•! Ills 0w1...«.:.. I.,r« i e«N• w b. o.. •rr -, ntlr It. tore. ls.. 0«•..... ..• •`. TAtiI lvu... l 1.•••r M....... v, tt pot Ih• t..w1 i.•« •"«N 1....•«....•. r« w. e..•..ti.. ��N• ltel w.00w so..rw vv. -4 r••►w /.•..•..1 l•U ..I Moto N«•..• /ql Lae two Moot" bi« .�• ..«..1. =r*" ..«•.•r Ih1••• ..l too..• I«. Sut?nlilted into the public record in connection v ich item `1"'=— on Walter Foenan City Clerk 00--1137 big • 11.ff0 Of0.• O...flf./•• toll not■pf of lr IRa"" M11 ONO OeON "O W O••elff.O w l.0effly O�•e'f! Itvt.«.Nw e•b/Moe► Sol %oe«.I rrefo • will OI/f1 M•wlo coolf.lo feo stOdMfy McOw.lo1 c....f.lol l.•{.ern0f• owl W /e0f/ww foO of l.N•. "e IN - ne us. NM/M. W c+N e "oel oe ti«N• 000/.S1o., a"MI«N KN au•p N/t Oudwt LWao . 1o.elfe{yto." �ee l0 ON e.•olly Ok .e•. s.. Ir;1.w.Nee « ei'O 0eI teeny 01 MN ftm" t1.o1fM IIO.oIe NI! O100q 14.4 IO.nfI 14..... •e� Ml.el O•.. •erMe W l..a.. r�� I••6.101 a"r•Gt Ob0i..1 1•eefeef«• W O.toy.eM, Ie•.Ne11e, O.O 0-I1401 Of111oa.e Mtl f11u•p o.f t.0e1{•. "It It1A•f1 I�e1 •e1 t�0elee Not14.we1 OfG.4hi. e.N. Nle OtWt I.'ON•.es4 Ie.IO•eo! •e/ I.OpeIN I.00 M•, clove.. NII W --q1 Ntt ... Der1.0. I.«I.r •101 W..01 poll OIL. f l0ef Olelw4f c•I«...Oe. Ib0e0 so... W IfelelNe steel f/ . Mr�•/w.p.ye O f10�«lot. l t•OtIN f c... / W Coot Oo.olflee, e...f. lose ��' ,o Nale.. %..a It..elOr, Iie., OoNO a" fM. /NI IIAI lee/ OAUO" ONlo" . W 1W1« Ny1q. Nel I1011•0► O.y{ 1 co"". re•.14.«{.O I.ON.IIM G•lW`e•01�If1G 11M w I•IlK grltMl . NII Jet" GIII Ifw I.Ilso"o. t/r-Oo.l 1►of« . Mt w„ Mtn twel' W f.•..eo. ta..o1. f.N.0ty,l Mw.rl 1NN11.I0.0.e Gill lo0e l..•1 /«ryff t.o.of.N«lie, etc ails tool U.N *be IN••fIq W O•.N UOL00 M eeseef till IDOL - bo« t M• Mw 16e.e1 O..•. e 11! f el.t•.•••.•f • sti.feo fofeleefe. am Omof M 411 GIII Mle0o e 111 Lw�le�•eMi U.rO.f.«Ir CO ...0•.. I.«y. Alf+f G114MIM1 1.«e• ~• I•••M l..•1 t«el O.rGwf .f.I st...y. G111 lef11 e 1...1{Y M•.•.•1 Owlel.... 111 Dot fYe GN I t 0.2- Mod 9•..49 1M1.1. I419 Iyj1 st•f Me Ow. y. ►... G.eJ G•Go re.... 1w0. O•.GIwN�•.«i•,. Jet I" 1w .. t•..•e.•1 M.q./«.1.0• HM Suhl-nitted into the public record n connection tvih item -4e Q1 Walter Foeman City Clerk tt.e.• 4ae MN 6.4f4.foo e/10 GNI to 44 6«./... ONfab W 010w •i1 h•.N eGf l GGII }I le�j MIIf e• O.00.4— 1. f. I, .. O•f•••O M••!.w O•O. t_e aM if Rr lfe0.. got Nlr if fIM. `i ,c+r••NNI•.NOo w Ge11 eels I I'1-/ef« 00 •.1.«t{y I1a114 1N.N.f Nlf f O I1••N4N • be•i I.•.... .. . 49N f ie. O'f7.G•f 1•..+... •e1! I y IeNl... t•e Ir1f•e Ne. t f ^= eef0 O Ml1 160.e. M:..N f 1«•40.. out . IeO: �fWf IOe.► 10.1 sail If ten O rw^ b fy c^S M.:O I %0e—Ael. r♦.Le.le !, 414— e111M 11N retf I••••r.e +1.e•1. L— S.W. Ira _ ,Maid•.. W O-•OON• rti 1SN fat • III$ Jim e111 0.. tfeff. i4 i✓IiWN M«.. d—. 10«•4 1 off All IIAf "As. 004 O.ofefe IM I/.1 /e /fit tM 0.00..e.•. st«ff . I.afll•..... c.wif'�.. /s.1 1ss0 lfOf eaNf« ft.e. 0.041. O.eMfe 10• • I.NOst«•e - �« O.eMM O..liss 11•I 6w1 40" Ih.e O.1 1 4"0 a 11r. t10I10 M«•• / 1ff1 NII lNf t0o�Oti O•e.a. eiif:«•, O•f.11 Oi.f«• .. feN lM lf.rf. , 0A,1o.ONM lMtw� •- � soft one wit 10 40 stir p 1 . M ** MNN. O.fdl 4 • e•ellNy ••.•w so /..1 t Mo O•ili.. 1st► I 1 ' iwl NI O•e /•.e tN..1•.e AN.M.s e.• w.•0«e ►111.0•0f - N~Af1N.=f 're11 1.1 1jN c•M 11..«N Iw.rr M• O. O Ilia re eV •1q; fir M ti f/•...~ty • J IN1 If •�. 0•• l•.•q• 1....e4 e..•N.• w I•.. . - •.I 10 lot 0\•1. a".. Oe�..IMIw - ;N o. 11 1 IM Newt ►f1 14rwfy IN0 M� o1a1..�� Iet Ino IM e�.yMet�l.�fw•41.. w\•. 1.INe•.re see•&** q 1.e111.f. �gUtc IM 1e'1Mt lIt 0..•.«\ \.11e..1y tweN«I.t�tw~w� ft"t•re.ti.le/ iN0 b11 fJM0600 - 0U% h'...N. W I—"bA ~i1U... plf fief Meew. ww b10 "If1.r\ ItN 0e.e.1 e.0 te. us , .t\w. 0b.11w ..O 1•.e..Ib..f IIq am %qGlea Mob 1•...1 we .." 0nef MONe M.p. 0..eeee.I.e h.. I/N low N10 lPOP 1.o.e.11y ..4 6.O.1e \•.0.. fbl..H1.. bl.. h.O.. 1.l•wr.1•. I1N 10" hetIts Areel &A~i, 1Ne10 b.y. ...e•.6 Mee". Ow. 1.O.Ie h11 lef W.. t•10.401. 40.0 1w. 0e606&rw4.. \ f4e QeM11�{y hN apt 1.e.b h.0e fwdwi h[. at " Nlf 11•.lfMef \ ts"O".I. le 11yje\, flew\..y 1.1.♦�f�..l 0!C w Net 11, . . p ha a .• bM�M.be..1 I /r.flw. bO.b .o 1f ' he. It '&,.I. \...ere 4•May M.O. two fl.*" 0-00e1N.a M..M«. tMC w 1011 ' � f 0.••1e•. M11"o ML.�Put... N.Owelr - 1\..eoi..l Oee.rwe I...M. Mc 0"1 Il..go- M«ell.•w.e he.u4.1 Iw•Me. N.Nf. CNI C.... apt by M1P/ Ilef f.�. 'b.....0 fl.w.ry C.•M\e IAN fCe/ apt 0e.0 are yM•ef 1i.Ivel 0.4 M•0b.1 OK OOee .\n .4009 aft 60.•/e41t O..Olsb, •«. wep.N Miee/ b\w.lwe.. ~ M.NN.M . 1001 apt 1.w•1 l.\wwwf.e �we1... Cre sr11N1.� 11-f ltlr 1!•[e� f�t0.� ypN�Of M11 J111" 11e1 /•l.1 01...N«f e.1 Ow.•e..0 f.Irb tNbwe, 0«.•.ef \Ne wlen ef.., �'N I.N.• C•I l.f.. h.b.el...I 1f\..1.. O.N M11t 1ebe M•..1.. AC 4,0 1'\"M e.. 16rN1e.61 }ei ... _ 1«.I.e.. . _ fV lee...y .y wN.•...1 0.\.\11Nwle.e f...fe... Submitted into the public record n connection wi h item en 121L-4/cw ©v _4 rj Walter Foeman City Clerk lIC 14e.. Igo" h.e.iff l.. MII Iflq use aft ..61 �f•d l/t 0•.re••ee.1�.1 tf�feN1•..1. fe�•w\flft�, e.. 1001 w tr..«N be.bw..1C � .. ... 0 It! • %4 ele.N... .1...Ifld. . 10 POIC.P.M; ATTACHMENT 6 Ic' 1307-CIN5024 'Ae #Ion NWO►PeiMa "Jwt Most cob at polle saw an aw"60u,"O uOtafto end adjust ftaffle 'aslool aseds as roamired. 40 e-GON. tow Varaws Owasso fares "Wabowns "Fougn Iowa. Lawdrop to be 404111'seemob0 stad 9940% of information wl"Ift @sitting powsm, t hwo"% leffiftea of Sluspo Nolovard war prior to WISIWII Avemim bridge @Woogn. Molly gigoloip ana 9friplof "WO44ft4o soliflop as roamir". R--bq &-oaye end Iff 200 Proof Adjust smignmelliefloo #Wblng in sewtowest Corner 00 provide too welfboj" twown two$ ans *Area 980OP048 left turn lanes. plus am free flow left turn Ismo Inside swifled e-wowillation Island. Tro of the loft turn IW40 for mem to 1-01 entrance r4op over k4 Awsaw wo Si )re ji#raot. a" Mandatory a" one "1WRol. Njustsmef of cpa"alizatism, IsIpmg In mout."sof mrmr Na of" of I" 4w" $"too "re"It lames• framettleame lare"It laters"floo elfs ship julot times. too$ oandstory ript turn lams am two 4aro"R lanes 4wrently In plus.) Revile signal head disols". Pedestrian features. 4104rfteal she otmer 51901mg. 0^0 "Vement Sormags as rad. A-21 N IT m cl Q) ZZ Li. ro > 0 c) C/5 "C...130T9Ksozs _ n. ATTACHMENT S 3. Biscayne Plata Prolect Entrance Entrance and exist drives to be coordinated with ultimate bifurcated ramp design and City of Miami Public Works Department. Geometric alterations at project drivel near Biscayne Boulevard Way and Biscayne Boulevard may. This is to include revised drainage as necessary, outside pavement widening within existing right of way, signalitation of exit drive to be installed when warranted, (provided, however, that such signalitation for the One DuPont Plaza exit shall V �Y allow for and be coordinated with the future Q. C U signalization for the 100 Chopin Plaza building. U U LL �+ L parking garage exit) and revised pavement G) markings. Also provide custom material and O t- r U construction for pporozimitely 1,200 feet of O U sidewalks along project street frontage and j C riverwilk frontage, and all seating, lighting, and — p landscaping, all for public use. = UO a. Biscayne Boulevard War Access Roadway City to preserve present public right of way for separate 18' eastbound access roadway south of Biscayne Boulevard Way to extend from SE 3rd Avenue to Biscayne Plata project south vehicular traffic entrance. Preservation to extend at least to date of completion of project Phase 2. ; (Separate access roadway not deemed necessary to i. project Phase 1). A-22 b. �,rrOV,eine �•• IeprQvonenlS tpytSlOf -Nam# 01oe01 le K � it?W Wes" 2@0% view' /vpMe MM It 11- city aaohs oproalsetely fivo fat of additional ►lgnt .f way Within loll buoy that Is neeSooty to ereete thew wstbeuM lanes. an deltlan of a" travel Ism. At the Miami Monty 1~40 t1.n. this loprovemaM mule allow a separate Is" twe Ieha. a agerate flwv4h lone. air a wwafa lane seed er a emblhatlen through.ow slant right to the lei._ ontranes ramp. I. SE 2ne Preet betwew Si let Avg"" ewe Ef ?At Avenue ft$tor roaaeey plan Calls far three travel loves wlthln #018 Milan of A one ftroet. to be oenat►uctp Within emtatlhg public right of way. tiWa travel lanes presently provldee.l del ® 7 t i r■�y3 im U p 03 . d Q _ C A KC: 1307965027 A TTA G NSA g N T •- SIM or r&=:S1a alwR-t7.13 a91IM1131 OF C9r.rnIT7 "rails aSvlslcx or alsooacs ritaalSoC A= R&XAG9 t &Catao OF tan AND wnA PArAW4= 3271 Saefatl+e costar C,rala last 7833eaesaae. rlos silos-i: u arts us•uls &tSassslos 389.061111, Florida &tatoteo. p acos lac feePeu,aa3aty on a" developer of u aproved devalopgaas at raslasal Aspect CUSI tog sMatttlad so asacal gap$% to tta local ae+erasess. sa. soe,osal /lasatK Cesaetl. as@ seNttagag of Ceissaltyr hllalra, and to all aligned p�esas% atsesaaa. ea %to 9: sailor: date spsafJN la ass 0ev61opsoss fltfar. s! 0 developer as salsit toe re ere ea fat floe apostftad S: the ae+ologcsa $goer roe is the aeo go :ss aat31 atssal rt to a:aaittN to toe roelw apwls*. soh to all "Welopaosta of rotleaal Asmast whisk Mve Nam, anIov:d alas• Acvaat d. ltas. 3t yyosoo save soy ®wallwa wwt tsaa to aitode"nth a, as33 e a" tatafsessat cesfdla:ar i3cil at. ui•uls. Plcsss ssad tM sriytul csaT1NN saaeal matt ai ta: dsetpatad lafal Asvetassat y sltleasl stated to the d:velssat older stab 111 copy to sees at ua tallewaa{, •' as The 1e11sa41 ylwiaa 611"1 at jaflaftatisar at all allotted PoratttlSa ."Sala./ atvldlea cl Olot a Plaaalal •aad Kwatauac evgcas of Land and Yates Kw41tsaat 3371 saesetive Caatog Cite:e. Scat Tallahassee. Florida 331:1 Pisa:: lerost yaws Anneaau& apart stets t&e isms sae:;:a l &t plev,dN slov. AIOIOAL STAM UpmCO _U aoperglp Periods w 1 So:ta/oay/Tear lteata/tay/sear = Q N V M+ela/toatr C: O LL awe as VAS "� Cast awry O faysls}osa saes$ V aq&ay aloe A/desas� U\ _ �7 &tests Laaatses w C Cary. uto. Sal Code O E //� v/ U ►rat. �U� FNJIKU At.W*-fv-tl post W* 11 vessel&@ any chant*$ 0*40 is %be proposed plan at develop*oot. phoslat. of as the cltresllstatleaa aeata&aet at. t2 Applieatlea tot De•►lopeo*t Approval &lace the P0ve30pP*a% s2 Regional Ss/eft tosesved-approval. fl�ase goes say 4/ts0*e tewestantial deteealaet&eaa) se by s Oat is artte. _- these taaage&. "*set 1f a rrfposse 1n to be mesa than aM Seat**$*. &Stara as Sahib&& A• a detailed 1ea61pt 04 of hash SMAge the elpi*& 01 Sae meditted also plan •faWlng/. zaeihas •A• ebM3d 4100 ante. Sae sollowsap s//itlsael Seems tt apiis,Mio. , 81 voseltbe *heat*• is W Plea of develo►ooas of Phaurt get LAe Soportlaf rowas1 set tea saaeag0est restat 61 state any anew% sa*s*Aental Dili sgll*ettows for develesons approval of sep*sts sot a assesantisl lovsatt*a desersssettett Saes Wes* Was to gas reports fool &Ad to he size/ Isr311g -tie nest .stet *1 Attash a *oPy, of AAy Reties at gas tea of ii develo ef%t older at the aoaseg*fnt lflsstioa of as by ` al0 develo►seas oases tasF Wes redacted she developer Persian% s• saa•snace 34tdigeltll: rJ. 31 Pea there bets a *haste la seen% governasat 3e11e41e14+ for say pottiea of Sae Ieve3op0efs%.alas* a develop0eat octet Was 1019041 It So..had tar naafSla•• legal g*letEA*at edlpted a saw Devoloplest of Repleaal lapses `evola�beat *$lot tot toe Sae as Maptst by the ptelost► Pleas* provide a espy *I sr 4F aaaestal local lovesSA/st. )': + 31 Proviso @*Flog at GAY Soviets baator,pla". zst:eseata: ;. site P3w• ass.. sat reaviewsly $smutted. U C "tog It * respease to to be slot• UAa as of two •estescs•. $&sass ae dnallat •s.• N 0 Proviso • sr q s0svariso% 09 developreat astiv&ty t2 C O �, - Proposed AM assoally ss"ants for Sae topeftiap year. 9 0ample$ Mato► of drf311wg Was seastt•sted. alto Laptev* v .&A. late aei/. Acres stood. gross sleet Sees telsatteetlt. Dassels of st*sate sapeatty sap3eted. mast% "% used. see. U C r CU Mats 3f A seepages it to be slot* %boo else aant*ast. Moth as •G.• tablaIa U 61 save any wnlevols"a %test& of 3481 is the develspest C 1*1hot thaw lndt•sd*al sis►lf-.&hill toast bass as%& to a separate easily or it 00e81 It 00. identity %lets. &to tits. _ AOI %ae beret. Please provide up$ waish Show Sae leas$$ ._ lAv*leN. O S flail% as►et Date. If a response So to be Mr• than eN Statem4e. attara as tah&DIS •D.• dl Mosrth* 0*7 rends p02e66e0d as 0711010/ &A;rfeat to %is 0rltl%e1 D*•ol0poaas of A0%10u1 Iq&et ass@ wasexiert to 1&!!one! of sea de•olspeont *ld*r. identify each :hat. &t& $:se. and ihtsaded N• *a a s&so plan W hap. Del*t St a teapa*se Is to be most thew else state&&*. a%%set as t&hsals •t.• • A_21 T•._ L Tool i 7Z 5 - ME 13079M5029 ua$$.at•ss Paso rates 1) 1.lrt rosP•nfrtuttal local, as to. end tosltrl pesat eh/eh have icon aatolRN. t./ Iles tot, or seater sstip rain toprttat plloa. splltr tj• aleaer. tap t.t ptalr, lot each. pose$ it a reophao to to be more $has she seat$*$@. /ttua iahiolt •t.- 11 access Sao aevelopooht•t. t.M local tevsf"#xC,r ear- tiROOV e64014aso arJlrtran* mot approval coatriwee the Olt develop"&% aralr. pots$ AAteeb a Lflalt so.* (Ne attack" Coro) #I prorate 401 fateroatles %fat is spettlsally rewire a7 tag Oaeoloppoat uldec to be lasladed is the G&SO&A repett. 101 proetdo..a states"% ""*amok! that all pte/Rs Lave Aces vest ea Loa'ot %A1 Naval moo mot is s"faraasso v See aest *As �Cs.pltlq V-d llfl. modltf . perals ssopletlal tat. yeestloasalsos title, agsulatfat$ 0 X_ acl� U -r-co i? N �r E r a�•Q eD Z' U. w J t_ � U O1 ,, Q1 . o E Cn 05 ti, 11t�s. w a •- ' .t ';�. �'fi�j ../. -•Ln ram.. ATTAGMENT 7 DNNTWN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY PROPOSED ALTERNATIVE TO THE DOWNTOWN DISTRIBUTOR BIFURCATED RAMPS (As Discussed by the Dupont Plait Task force) t. Naoeoaw►t arttawa ). a*lalw$q w$$ swoop • M ., OM, ). 1800e40010" totaialq utlf *lr+a*.wo W. atrrattor to a Ire a•. 3101 a 21• ■ 403 loartttwt a, fi am"p etiw of •altlwas Iwa on tI 3" St. bets" i �.• od t 306 t rtr )!e• ■ 13rA resaft0rattiw 3M• . 3 sate atr *wt« 3, NNna ste��••.afs at ! Sea A•1./e10"W4 elta. gat one solawt+raar /'Iara1N :w�tr Wave e. A"104001 fa*lwaa a* •lowlq t Ire rw w*ww of aaat*a efts. .., a.a a foe at. >70' a 33•A Ilaal. raleaf "*loss Nowattwt A. ossaele ato r ommetraatlaa amiamor ta.Own•t plan Mal • asp• e. oba tier• a124619..lerrlttwlw. ana apolga C. mars aagssa aolotwwta at *toff$• ' II�aI f� U C C �C Q- C O O, t_ C.� O C r C p 0 E (D (I) i� .r P«: �algeC`03 EXHI®IT "C Attached to. and made a part of R•501uttm 66•828; October 7, 1996 OEVELOM+ENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT F (R MIAMI CENTER I Locator In M1001 23.07 SCUTN FLOR10A REOICHAL PLANNING CMJMCIL c s Cv U a) U O � r crJ U _ 0 U�� U r, O "'� OT9�5032 fit. I south florida regional planning council �r�V Sc�. �c+�weoe:.s I..�e �� �c.-..�: -U _ :JC"s� 7�ere ;3t:; =c• - Lw February A. 1966 Tie "onersole Xavier Svare: rover. City of Miami 3500 Pon AmeriCen.Orive 111841. Florida 33133 I Oser Mayer Svares: The Sovf1 Florida Regional Planning Council %as officially adopted t%e enclosed Regional Impact r000rt far the Miami Canter 1 Awmended ADA and forwarded Copies to the Florida Oaoertment of Community Affairs. and the Sov►h Florida wafer Management District. This report Is orev)dad for your use In reviewing t". Davaloosont at Regional lepoct pursuant to Section 360.06, Florida SWOOS. i while +f% staff. of the Council Is available to #soft* In the resolve -too of any matte► regarding fne report. tie Council Iva* no legal met-WMism through vnlcl It Can set an this report pain, except tnr"'i ail"al procedures. Recent Changes to Section 340.06. Florida Statutes. and Rule 9J-2.2n. Florida Administrative Code, ere now effective and ►eauire C.�engsa to and eat criteria for local government Dev*1000Gnt Croats'. For example. 3/0.01103)6(e). F.S.. nee realilres t%otf •local governments shall not sopreve a development of regional Impact that was not make adeaHete provision for PAi lc facilities needed t0 Kcdmoddata the Impacts of tie proposed development. w►less the local government Includes In the development Oros► a Commitment by the local government to provide these facilities Consistent witn development seheoule operated In the aaelopment xaer..." ►loss review Council recommendet;ans. Section 380.06. F.;,ltg�S). and %to 9J-2.23. F.A.C.. Carefully prior to Issuance of the Miami Center I AmendOo Development Oraer. C491e6 of My aavolooment order Issued .If, roger to *,Is project must be franlmlttop to 1ho Sdvts Florida apionel Planning CownCll and t� 61erl40 Department of Community Affairs. vn;th have AS siys fharee M er to make an 4100ee1 decision based an wMt'Nr t'N County s development order 10 COnslatMt •It1 tie COWCII's report amp ►ocommolldeflons and at�er i rsaYlrements of t-4 law. Q— ,� C 1ZC U U Q) .4 v L aJ U O O O r } U _ O C� ZOD a E CO Pa► °«: f -01�,"5033 r The Howreele.Xavier Suarei ►eqe 2 February 4. 19l6 It N can be of fwrtler pal at arcs. Olesse call. Stacerely. Ana slater Werie Executive Director A0%k Encleoure ccl lerglo %drlquet Jar+ Lefler ORW atlmksye Ess. Los .Rawl lawn My Kenile Tee Oould David C. Rmlmard Paul Sober. Jr. Rvaaall VIC" . Jr. Jeff larcee. E•e• rynelle rumen Wttner Corson. Eae. Jean Ntley Ray Formals I%tb 2a0uta Susan CeuglW*W CharIKs X"1210 Those$ Theraera+ oeorge firestone e I { 1 .1 U.O O'L N .0 L- U O C � � � U O tll . O O ►C: 1307clC5034 TABLE RW CCNTENTS rat LIST Cr si"(S....................................................... LIST OF TABLES ........................................................ LIST Or 1*18ITS..................... ............. I................... INTACOUCTION ...................................... POT I. rRPJECT OESCRI►TION........................................ - A. AM (CANT IWCWXATION.................................. 1. PROJECT IWOAMATION ..................................... TART It. rROJECT.IMrACTS A10 ISSLES................................. A. ENVIRONMENT AND NATLPAL RESOLMCES •. teaoMr ................................................ ; C. ►UBLIC FACILITIES ...................................... .: s .�. 0. TRAf4FORTATION......................................... 23 5rAAT III. COWENTS FROM OTNEII AGENCIES ............................... —PART IV. SL►OWY A.O RECM*fMATIONS................................. i U C C L U CL (D a) .o U- a`) U C C7 C U� ID C E `7 O E Zr f(C: I ��79t�503S ' LIST OF FIGURES - �: � 619vre No. T1•le �lG� I location Mop .............................................. Imaster Develop -lent FI1n.................................. Jllsceyne.flan $0011 Eievallon ........................... 4 Traffic Impact Area ...................................... :$ U Q . S Propel" fyelflOHlons to Me Downtown Clstrlpu*or elfureato" flame system ................................... C O . e Current FOOT Oealgn for the Downtown OistrIbutor N •Q LL U . 1Ifurelto" Ramp $IstM t. - -O •�• ' i 7 People .................. Ealstln9 Downtown ► le mover $fallen ti O �- r - -.. O O O pa . co j 1 A1 r. 7".—. p 1 A 1. 1 Gol ;f�: I:�OTC5�36 I � LIST of TAeLES` a Table No, T191e I Previous Deve-lopment h ens ............................... 6 j 2 Proposed Development and Aeatnq i I 3 Envlrorwentel Issues ..................................... .. A Con/trucflon Costs ....................................... 'i ' 7 ►armaneM LwploMaent Impacts (Alternate 1) ............... U C a Permanent Uplaymen+ impacts 1Altarn4te 2) ............... N C ! 7 Permanent Employment by Satter tAitarnN♦ 1I ............. i ) Q U Permanent Employment by Settor (AI Nrnste 2). "e O N •p 1L ............. U .l 9 itPeps Impact fAltarna9a 11 ........:..................... 2' 1 O = to fllGal Impatf (Alternate 2) ....... ....................... 11 wafer. IfalNvafer, and Solid waste ....................... U'- ) 12 Existing Traffic (pndltlona ..................,........... 27 ty , 13 Pfoq►a�en Tr napor9 tlon Improvements .......... ...... L ' 14 Major Cpwlttad Developments ............................. .O 0 U • 15 Trip Generation Rates .................................... 32 1t Cumulative Tronspo" ttloo Impacts ........................ 33 iT Cuwuietive 1994 Peat Pour Traffic - Ail ................... 34 is Cumulative 1994 Peak Pour Traffic - ►M ................... 15 19 flDdlfltatl0nl to the De."to.n Distri0utor N furcateo Memos - Dupont ►less Task force .......................... Y! i 20 1994 levels of Service vit.4 Project Traffic and Improvements ............................................. 3- 21 Mettlonal lmprova.ents td •na Downto.n Distributor Bifurcated moot J System...................................� T 1 f 27 Critical Intersections Yi9leu9 elfurcated Ring System .... .. IF . LIST OF EX4181•S Ee-11pl• Np. Title I Coda for Waste TYPOS Ommmon1.7 Assoet-also v41] E1oI SIC Industry .......................... I........... 93 j lI N of 0otentlal ►letaroous waste Gererators p7 SIC Code ............................................... += Refomokorboso-•lanf Soetles .............................. 49 d 'ropow interim Tran"Ortetlon loprovewents ......:.:... .. SMaster Develops&" Plan ................................ :6 Annual Status Maport •• U ` O Ly CAS N ?CV U�Z7 ry O 3 c � O c CP) :°'. or,- "p T0�5038 �. Iln.�rloM In way. 1979. tan council rsv lawe0 and sporeved tee Miami center 1 A9011catioo for 0ev000w9019' Aooreval. located on a Parcel of levee In tat I I, Dupont Plate area knOwn as Bill Polo . end,►ecowwanaed Project eeoreval. i subject to 10 odndltlons. to the City Of Mleel. At t1e *IN Of action an 1 Miami Center I. tan beticant. tlelywell COrperetlew. was, 8110 Planning to ' eavel@o the ram•ining four black& Of 01.e01t Pleb. A prima►y, Conterw aapr•ssed by Council maabers was t%et these remaining fern blocks be winter Planned end developed with on Integrated. Co*Oatlbl• da/Ign Pad wile of uses to create a awat}ty urban enviromeant In tea care at 4OW—O-A l , ,. Miami. Purtner. since Public agency elsonlog for a final transoortatlen sys•ep t0 support the full bullaout Of Dupont Plata was -l11 **W process at tat tIN Of t.a revisv of Mianl center I. t*a covlctl only ►edMlred tier tie •. Applicant cove$" an Interim tratflc OPeratlOns also end Iwipl omen+ t+ON E -_ roadway ImprovemovIS wnlcn world both su000rt project traffic ens be { r c+mW lbl• with wnatsvM ultlae•e transoo►t•tlOn eelrtlOn eight }{wally be adopted for the eM lr• arse. On try 2/. t979. the City issued • 0eveloPwent order. Inccescratlwg 17 condition* Inclyding ty.reftir/Mt Per In••rlwi ♦ro1f1[ (wiprOveAWwts prier t0 Issuance of brllalwg paAit1. sooroving Mlani coat•r 1. •blywell Corporation later secures oetlopt On "foe eA tan tow ►emalw{rS . blocks In Wpont ►isi$. On Ally 11. 196C. SWO%sest Bawik. Other of t.e nert!•set•rh block. Submitted an ACA to •r C-A%Cl{ to cone f"t a me* I ! I Sert*eNt rlwalclea can•sr on t14 }our+'+ block. On Ally is. 19BC. i _ C: Cd C 0 m .0 LL L U o = o c C3� Uo Tsai: c«:1 �O7:��0;g tmolywoll Corporation Wpeirtao an /Ca to Construct Miami Cantor 11 on ♦•e odor ttree block/, Sot\ ACAS were subsaouently approved by one Council . .Council $tfff Strongly urgep t•q O4:00n0 Plate ape* Cal dtevteldpers td Cooperate In jolntly arvelooing a final transportation Improvement plan amid would 1) provide acceptable levels of service In C11pOnt plaza at full oullodVt. and 21 to Compatlbia..elt?%public plant for t%te 1-99 blowecated romp extension and tno Cdenfown People fbvor syloom in Cupon- Plato. rho Sopllc Moms agrood t0 coo"pote wit" ea l odor amp wi"1 a task force of Cltt. County. and State H aft to develop on ultimate foppery and ffsnt;t System to Suppdrt t%e "fee covelopmenos. As work began an fate development of a final trensooftatlon solat;on for fuil bulldout of Qmpon• Plate. welywell Corporation was react' to ob•ai^ 1•6 Witting par.Its for t•+a -w w eaiating portion df Imlaal Caner 1. 1• aeemted pr Hdemt a" certainly Ceat-erreCtive to malt to aeterwine ra- I"Ofiem ldwowom"s mould be /•pall/ed for rlri Center I until t1e final transportation solutlon as develoded. rwefolre. on September 25. 1000. tat Cloy of riom1 Commission eoortered an emendw,en• to ./e Miami Ctentsr I Oovaioomemmt Crater. wnlcn postponed •w rewlramwo top Interim Improvements from prior td building per+lts tp N 'Or to issuing Certificates of occupancy. Since 19" . •nte Soveieat Ramat Plnancial Center ias boon Consirl;tep iw N e" a►air:-owever. "Miami Center Im pro,Kt sea never stwoo SAC Itl Covelopme- ^Fate dip+mad iw '953.. Secowso tote rqe-axpifac Yiemi Q c -0 LL (D O 4t! V\ _ O E CJ) � ." ;«:1'079"'50d0 } Caner II oeveloDment order reflected +1e impacts SAO Aaplican+ 'fair snare' for regional roadway Improvements for to" Miami Center I and 11, jnd +10 Impacts of Miami Center I lave cnangeO out to substantial mddifics•IOns +O +1a project, +11s assessment roevalua+es +1e. Imbac+a of . i . t40 Miami Center 1. Thl/ assessment of tna Miami Center I development us been bracarso by { +1a Sout1 Irlorids 11teglonal /fanning Council. of rowireO by the elorida EAVItO mantel land and Watt►. Management Ac+ for all Development/of Ileglonal Impact. The aslasamont Is based an information Wool led by +he Acof[cant, Miami end Dade County staff. Official plans. eonsultantl_, and field Inspae•'c�. Additional relearcn rela+lve to spoclfic issues was conducted by Council 'staff *mere needed. _ • In accordance •ltn the Act, tnla assessment oroviOas an overview of.Ne positive and negative Impacts likely to result from the proposal. Tie reedmwamdations are Intended to assist ♦eo City Cavalasion In roaming a decision do the proposed development tnrourmn conlioaretlon of regional. In addition to local. Impacts and Issues. . • CopfNl of any "OwalOpmen♦ order• (an Order granting. OMTiln9, or I. ` 1 granting With Conditions an .application for a development permlt) issusc with regard to t1i1 prelat+ mus+ be franymit+00 to the Sau+n Florida i Ragipnel /llnning Council one ono Flpriez Department of Colalnelty Affairs. C .L �� aU .Q LL C' 0 O V\ 73 cam-. O (D a) } 607 err etc. N4 PAR? I - PRCJECT CESCRIPTION A. A►PLICANT INFMMAT10N Project Name. MIWRI Canter AOpllCantt 1101y"ll Corporation. as Agt^t for Miami Center Joint - Venture end CNOOIA As"Clafa/ . 300 Miami Canter 100 C%OOIn Plata Miami. ►lorlos 33131 ' Date of Acceptance Of A0011catlons December Oats of Recolpt of Local Public Nearing Nbtleai January 6. 1%6 paeollne for Council Actloot February 24. 1966 - Oafs of Local Public Net,rings February 27. 1966 Type of 0ivolO06e0t1 Office/Natal Location Of Oeveloomontt City of MIamI .0. PROJECT DE=AIPTION The CS acre Miami Canter 1 (sell ►01nt) tits Is Iocateo in gown-*-^ Miami betwn 11Iscoro soulevera an* slscayne say, and between - Illayfront ?ark/CNopin Plata and tie entranceto t. 141401 River ((Figure 1). An Agplicatlon for Oavelopeenf A00POvel (ACA) for t11s site go$ approved by the Council In May. 1979 .non tee orojec" known AS salt Point. Inelude0 an office tow r. a ROfel favor. one 1,e0 cpndoalnluR toeers built over a podlum/parking structure ITable 1). The sits of tee Project vas 001" eo $1Igh" Y by tna City Of Milan's OevelO0Ront Order and Oartlelly eoeplete0 as smOvn in Table V"o U cz 9 - O r rCt O O O .^ U� r .0 O � O19P5042 . Fl URE t LOCATION MAP Tl G b0` nt. 1307965043 t, at..aa a.ne.Kwr ti.a i. Yw Yw wP•. A.w. tta. us 614 M, rwr 600,1a .id i ... ,tt.aM ytt tr w., b..• . 1•w I!f.M �� •s wt bin Stew •rya LWOW 1.,:/ Yew %P" ,.M.tr u. aura, .r. Von Pliafe I at fhe original fall Point DKI. .nice Includes t,a 37-0ort Ea■aro Bail Office bulla)ng. +,a 35-story Pavilion MD+ol. a ►Iva -story read/parking Structure (625 abacas). and a 323-604ee office grrage. lies boon ConStruc+ea an f,a nort,er!n por+t.n of t,e Site. This developed portion of tea project. known as Sall Point Plaza, .es the subject of foreclosure proceedings against mlywell Corporation In Cc+obey, 1961. and is no. con+roped by t,o Saftk of Now York. The aov,arn portion of the site. .,Ica Is un40va100ed. Is owAwt by M M)aell Can+e► Joint Ventura aed is t,e subject of • eon+raet at dale option to Russel Mira, rnd COPOar•y• Thi.t area. Original IV proauS•0 r hh t0'coAtSln $00 total cOnAproposes iniNa units )n ♦w0 torerf• twp . 7 I praaawlnantly office towers known as Siscere Plais Plfan I- She ' M qures 1 •na 31. 87 s po i C � Q 70 wry) U � Co " I3079rc5044 rWVRC + MAS'r'R DEVELOPMENT. P' 4N U a..0 cu N c�o O U1 _ � C ^CD j O C: CO d? tl. o4mv ►��: I �0���5045 MUR£ 3 BISCAYi.,i PLAZA SOUTH EL ✓ATION a _ I Y 0 U Q LL L) O ' L7 € O 0 SOURCE AOA err A«:13079FG5046 Tne !Iscayne.ilate project yill consist of ►afse Is a !9-story ors• toyer atop a 10- ry "r ymc pox Im±,•Ir� parrinyi eff Ice. end rat Iil ! uses. and ►%sye-2i- 0 3i-floor volt LONr +'lc. -111 M built upon +no pools" constructed rn snow I asi, 2)... Tse.Applicant is - proposing 60 executive eoertwents (120.QOC Square feet), 160.0c0 !aware /oat Of r0oll/oamerc(el space. 700.0c0 sduare hat of offici s0�ca. ena T.2C0 parting spaces. Tne eomorCiSl Specs i InCTua-if s argil (10.000 square feet) restaurant/Cabaret In the f Mden park on ♦ae lit" (t0 ) floor of ♦ne 9 o podium. Tie parr si11 incIwo* an artificial skating rink/dance floor. ftsse 2 will Include 90 eaeco lve spe-twee♦ units (100.000 square feet); 60.0c0 soma►• feet of retail space, and 760.000 severe fee♦ of office space. If Market tondI loos sea not favorable for t-e 1!0 dselling units proposed In r+neses I and 2. t,e 300.000 square tart gill be converted to office Space. j {1�1 •��Ift dy.Mf�r rY wl�y . q�M� f��.... T�.1• I{ 1 � gyp.. 1L. r•.1 Z.L IN. .•.. ti.�M•. N• �ri � ws. v..r w.,w •w w., w.n• • .w •r. ! ! •.wh.� hW �.qat �.w • fY.W Y V.• lot /M.aV 0.94 w w.•. .A w. AW f 9 J t? tc `LL O _ i U C-1 c N O U- (D O � r cif _ O U� C' ^E ^ () W 37RC5N A •►torpor IrOMfms*f" along t'le •ovt.}Iefn poaroery at tM site (pjKOnt t0 f4d e.y/Rlv6r) wlII ps COn11rYCtOd t0 prpvld• • pOdditrlsn COnnOetlOn }rcm "a 6ayfldO prOjOct. +-Ifo" h sayfronf Park. t0 MIOw( Can+*?. WOvro floor Wall/COANrC101 $DK• will be locood sdjatsnt t0*110 ►romonldw. _ C � U o o LL L (� CD Ul _ E �Q v / (D tp `ji 6/y PART 11 - PRCJECT IMPACTS A►.p ISSUES - - 1 A. CHVIRC/MENT AND NATIJIAU RES"CES 1. sup -try Table S summarizes +he Impacts of the proj*V on t.N environment. Several Issues are described below In more detell. AgOIICan+ e111mefas of one- end eight -Hour carbon monoxiae CC:) concentrations were made using computer mmoling. The hlghee -t* - predicted eight -hour CO concentration Of 7.4 (62 percent of State Standaral occurs in 1"I . If project traffic is subtracted from the snalysls. +hs prealcted elont-now 1991 concentration crops to 3.7 ppm (41 percent of State 1+enaara). Oade County maintains a person*"+ CC monitoring site at 1o1 East Piaglar Street, welch has reeoraea many erceeoa"eu.o• CO standards over the las+ tow years. Con+ihuea eaCasoonCel CouIC result In the assignation of the Soya tlorfaa aleshea as a non-attelnment area for CO by I". U.S. Envi►ormentel Protection Agency. South Florio• Is aueeay a no"-ettalrment area ►or atone. although few esceeaances of ozone stsndsras Hove peen reccroao since 1982. Io is �U CL L r- C � O O U>L ^ Cil . -� O E e� off ► �079pG5049 TA/lI 3 LNVIROWERTAL ISSUES I SSIE C9rEi+T Air Dusl {ty See 2. Lane and Sod a The project al+a was created by ostensive 1 ^� 'nil_ling of 111scayne say In't." beginning - of this century. mats eating as far back as it" I"* that *no historic•-Iflorsl lno -� ' of blscayno bay followed the pre"Al _ - location of blacsyna bulaverd. Save V — •Co C additional filling may be no0asss►y to brlmg the to refsfirea.flood alavefians. . site . - Iapeaad arM should be spray". mulC•Nd Of greased. as necessary, to preysnt 2011 C O erosion. . - z Flow Prone Area The alb la located In t Soo-yaor flood '' O are ant the ■iniwul ttest floor elevation O C C (L! apoetflad by +he fe06f8l Insurance Admlalstratlon IS t14.0 NGVO. According to tho AODSICsn+. the ground C O "f} floor, rs+all. Officer and parting Wes sill be built 1+-8 +intend elevation of �! G) C fast W.W. .Mlcs meets Owe County but not a federal Rood erlterls. Occuosn+s of +%e - . grow" floor will not be eligible for Insurance. All &tees - _ � federal flood other too- wVC. . of +IN project will be amve •14 . . end ere rare will be al igibia for federal +s �- •�� . - flood Insurance. - wane.. Drainage. and See 3. Itasardgus Materials wetlands. Vegetation.. - The sl+e am$ not contain 41y wellends Of i and wildlife significant vegatatlo-, Ong Is of 11+/10 i value to Wallis. only +head Giant soec{e lifted In Cxnlel• 3 Ghoul; i be uaea In future brgjW1 lswdsceping. ' Mlatericst and Arehseologieal According to t10 Dodo-Coun+y Ml$+Ofic Survey. 'S S{te significant archaeological teatures.�e andlor ort{fectual as+s 04V be asodsltee beneNh fill ateng 4hd eastern boundary of tea site. Tha cso. County attiaeelagta+ should be notified Of the conetructlan >thwyle and all~ $toss to the site for Apnitoring, and an archowlOSlst shcult be on sits during brojeCT osnh wore, if W . env 8"hasologi Cal finds art moo$. r-.'{ns":e- '. TIon snoutd be Waved in That Dam icn Of . - T�s fire vr!Il O"; Ciala Csn Taee Wic^a ' to avrvdv spci Or_ excavaTe +Y af`;4IC's. 3 . as R Nhpug 1. +1e CC COnCentraf Ions ad :Seen* f0 f1s UlS,I Gnt%r I - proj0C+ (la Ofyfron♦ Park) ore not pfol K4so to exceec afend Nds. projocf trefflc alone Contr1but9s 3.7 ppm (ai Percent Of State standa►d) to tno sign+ hour CC Concentration. Tl%o A0011Can+ uauio incorpor9+e +1a *ranatsOna+Ion and Sir dualrty I1Rp9Ct reduCf(on Strategies listed In Conaltion I ;r-p projoc+ OssigMQoM/or Operation.. 1 �. 9at%r. Nrelna9o. Ma wolsrdous W+erlals $olt parings 0009 by t1s itpot)csn+ In 1979 zww%d +no+ . 2raun49061' 11410e8+3 tNe sits Is 800fOXIoN0e1y ! fast below aeiBtln9'grsos, GravlOw091' beneafl f19 sits It $@IIAs %eC s snOuld Act be used for "am coaswoollon or Irrigation. Tnora are no surtaC0 wafer bodies on-sl+e. Oiscayna Say. a $tate kiud+IC Preserve &%a Cv+$+analog Flo►io@ Your. is loce•ee Imm93104oly eas+ at +1e project site. ¢ _ sccora ino 4v +te IOoticeAf, the aralnegs system for tie esls+Ing portion of Miami Can+%r directs af0rswater to a ._ perimeter 9etllf►s+lan system trencl. liunoft *,hot oxcooas +?,o .Copecity Of t1e trans system flows Into dafenflon tenMs end +ten to drainage wolfs, vntCT OISClarge runOft to too satin% fawlter.. The System is Caeable of lanai ling t1e 21-Tea► svam . Tie proposo0 Yism; Center drainage Sys+om •ill be dosi9 Ma •O ' %#Role a is -yes► star* in ♦No same manner described P"V o. fOnly runott In lzc*ss of tie 23-yeae a ;tn stars .;it taa�e }` 1 tie site. C 1LC Q C O N O �y U,..0 y v � .a., O y 5 E U) (D 'rj 1 1(t I �pT9�C1051 Tie A0011comt so$ proposed f0 eeinfoln f5e parslag Serege Oy ■assing 0000 ♦se paved surfaces and t-en rdvtlfg tse was.CO-n Wafer. WA;:1. COAfslA a greater amount of. 004 wore tligni y Concentrated. 001.1utonts tlan ♦ulfotf from otter on -site Imparv(Ous surfaces, f4roug� Oil 41%0 gene IMe►captOrf '•0 a sanitery sewer. 11.4I2 Was-44-A program will not allcm gisc urp Of polluted •asaoo.n Water to +se Place" aquifer. During COnstructlen of tne, resolndar of theses( GMar 1. toe A0011cent sneuld place rip -rap. temporary berms. or ot"r barriers along t.y porlooter of fly site to prevent alscsar;O of cdnsirYctiprrglpee ♦uaft to tse lty. Tie design and construction of tNo project sAOuld also Include perefften• U-105 or barriers. st least One foot abOWe grade. 60 flat BItaC• d)scaargs to ►te ley *no not occur after t+e projec' is Complete. Alwner source at Water pollution. pOtenflelly Men wore - leMful "on storwmeter ♦unoff. Is satar0ow .fists. wasarzus Wee+• Is deflfyq by tie U.$. [nvlra.mr•tel fl•oosc•ion Ag r'cy and f%e State as 042te flat ie igAitsele. corrosive. ►eac'Ira. or tonic. [asibil 1. InCluOaq fit tly ear of fkis QI &asasswom+. is a list Of Sts"ard Ilyuetrlal :Ipsificstion (SIC) Codes for racilltles hat lava boom found to provide one d< wore of •v "1lor0ous Wastes l ii•ad is, [mien+ 2. No" l ia•% are ea:e•p•ee t•o■ •.e rlo•'aa .•••+ �.al:., •eev rca sc• 9 P �1cWr f G V� C LY a LL v p' O rw CL1 C: O V� C a � E 11EC:.13079FG5052 ►aguia+loos, and all facilities +ae+ fall w11-tln +5e50 S1C codes are .redus►eo by t1a AC# to prow jar Information regor4ing +roes aftd aeoun+s of was+as Ignore -too N ♦w facility efto pow +%Is waste 1s being sanegea. I+ Is Ilrsly +\a+ po+en•Iel smell Ouan+t•y ustraous vas+e generators will 00 occupants of misol Coo -or I.- The Applican- 1as p►dposeo to corer loading trees to seclude rainwater. i Implementation at the addltlonel 6eesures listed In Conal+loft 3 a dill fur"40, reduce +-e.possibill+y of adverse I.pec+.on regional water duality. . >i. tcl7flt+/r t • protect costs Table A susmarizes project costs. Incluoing construction �lotete1ent ant wage*. f v T•yt • • W*VLTrer R1TI 1• Lar1• . rr o. Nr•+ n••• /Ir••.•• •••r / w 11. or A.i/ - .r.• 41 ' %r •t. 14 10.00 11.11/ 119.//1 r' ..•Mw• ./ wI Irw• ... a �'• •Ar grgw I10,Iw 11/.W +1.d 11/.all li ..6./01 mo.— w«.• �• 1 Wa••� rrrq - •f1.1 « W rM.69 Ire w.w ..� •« war `• , tt••r• U.P.-4. r•• w•rw .w •w. rlw•.. «•n. Mr . ••• M. 331 r wO •« w•w.. f1/t•w •m •f/. •11•M • 1 `� Ir1�r•1 1•.,«N• pr•r. ,.� Input • K• & •' r� is ( 4 CL JJ? U C U _ O U� C O S A(G. 13079Pc5053 2. permanent EmolovmM+ . Total permanent projoct eimploywlant is estimated to be' 12.iaa for'Altornate 1. wniCh Includes UO residential units•000.000 sduare feet), and 13,737 for Alternate 2. wnich Includes 300.000 additional savers feet of office specs end residential units. because a majority of firms locating in new offices move tram orthar office buildings In nu Region. only about 23 percent of the fobs Can be considered new to the Region. For Alternate J. assuming 2,497 new project employees. the Council estimates that mew project employment. by Its Inolreat and imduead affac+s. could generate up +o l.aa2 new jobs In the Region. with 1.637. 3.716. and 69 In lroweo, Does, and Monroe. respec+1vely, This employment corresponds +0 3106.3. million In total wag as end $184.1 million In value added +o the regional ecoedmy ITabJo 7). Alternate 2. smming 2,782 new project employees. could generate up to 6.100 row jobs In +he Region, with t.657, 4,163. ano 7{ In broweed.'Code. and ftnroe, raspectivaly. This wmployment corresponds to $121.5 million In total wages and $207.6 million In value added to +M r9glonil economy (Table 61. Toble.7 snows the seC+dral distribut100 of permanent emoloymen+ for Alternate I and Table 6 snows the distribution for Aitarnata 2. . . 6 9'7 20 s (CS Q) Q 0 U LL C)a CO C 0 U O U C� O S P«: I �079�cId Tytl f al1fl►1d10 Vm%Q"t`;t .Ir.R) A. M►•a1NT .H ►t. • 016LM , OuarO Oka lowix "flow NACA .a•ciT1/1t, aolelA•, .11.1Io' aOO•CLLTtAat NOVIQl 111MIr0 cowm%vlt 7.. 11t. ""0ACTt�.V4 T). s."O"UTIw1 ate vt11,1T1ts a1. Olgtl•tt 1O.tS Jt. Sr.q, 70aR l00. 01. 1e. 7M. Ile. r1M..(t. IMs. a/e R/at 11T•Tt all. M0. +!. IaM. !J). �v1tSf Ne. IeOe. 71, aeT, 3+7. KM 0. TOTAL TOTAL last.0. last. )tte. N. eaal. eOT. 0. "Tat Oas$ 0000 11 �aattCLLTVK. fatlwr, PIPING &MICLLtWt ttOVllYs af. to •u.y t0. J). J. fa. It. CysT01CT10M 17Ja. Jate. w. a?". e!J. walwac"Mp o 1277, 40H. 20. S)M. 070. *IIItbTITIPt ale 011617I91 eat. "%ISAIl rua el a. ta)t. )0. )eeo. 1: S6T. RTalt I"m yafl, l0e). JU. IUe. I1.Ia1Q, 144. be +ttat sST.Tt- w)J. J77Ta. lag. sJe.e. f213. =evicts 1M4. mqt. 010. 43211. tall. eONOIO101► atf. +Me. Jf. 1lJe. ill. .mat )nu., t«te.. me.• +asle.� 17124.. C.faNaWaft" lion lI 'awlm"Al. rests7OT. /1301.4 R.' 307.' 0.' )A.' tic.' AMICKT1Jlat QTICtl a1sly N. H. e. IJt. M.. C1f1sT+LL91i 1111. 111)e. ale. Irate. uet, N,�Ku,y 7ff0, flte1. 139. ))OIS. 9916. .IO yTgIT1tl ACIIIIle.IlegT.hi i7411. 100. In1. waQ w0.it. 1J7T. aeet. cite. Th efut qaQ 7f1). I1St7, ee0. t011fe. .001. t IM.I�t. 1". me atat IVATt AIWS, !felt. Is". 1a)Sq. Slool, z1v,Ct/ rus. NT07. Inn. el ON. 1f1a7. l.eOlaltM elf. w0. S0. JOfO. , ye. 7{Q 100101. n.)Jt. aN1, Aw17. SU)J. 0. 1.Wt AM 1t0,0 tl �ylrCuT{/It. tt)tJ•`•. hfnllC' at. IS).' 0. Iw.' 413.' aeI1CLLTWt SPVIC 1 73. 12e. 20. lie. is. Coll"IXTla 1f11. ITtl. 1H. a1N. 10T7, rp/att ING Jfee, eOa). at, 1tee1. 2070. 7e.IQ1aTaT10Y me urli, 71ts )707, Itwt, 171, taflf. 1342. T11OltUU elaa H). ))N. 1s, NM. M. qV&.t w.I2 4090. two. tw. 1024e. not. tt".Qt, IMl..10 11tat t)7aT) J1N7. .q1). 741. 71717. 11fa0. =Ov1C'tS Ie077. 43111. Il'). t)JSe. toile. WWO- %? aft, „00. .77. 110). 71e. tTTat nte0. 17tMl. T+). tMIN. J11f1. 'aar•r+ \IaO./ awT •1a• •O•a1 M 4 •.w ..e. taaa; srt • V 4L C Co c U o C � C �y �a I i M�c5O55 TMI.s . 1tA11r(.r t►•1o*orr r»rf c,Ltp9.lrt » A. tl mo frT fe. w. 9y11 WAN442 soot 4Mq 11[U919 KICI, . �e011C%L+tm. 1Off"T. IIU,r• 1.� 0.� ►OO,CILTI3tf11aS O1q e. 9. •moor Ctoot"Urld1 t11111IK+v,r - 9,. 107. 1, 799. 99. w,wwl+enar e1e N4,T4f f0. f97. 2. 301. f1. •lt[Ylt wea 32. ,3e. 1, 1#3 19. IV&IL wea fit. f79. 70, e». 17f. teft"a af. be rest. tff&?t 539. n10. If. 1991. 21). a l"T,1 739, 11M. 39. MID. Md. e.nwrT e. e. f. o. e. 10TeL 1K7.. e,H.• 10.• 9, e0. "I.. i. 7Re46 smi too" to �IitlCtLt1R. ttal+eT. hl/r a.� 7f.� e.� Y.� 219.E eO1C1L71YL 1WvIaI It. p. to. 191. fO. •ulr It. f9. f. If. 20. corm"% a 0 19M. 1Tn. 14. eq9. 1t". a1LseC1yUA tiff. "It. 37. 9" 1. 99e. teer9OfTe11011 e10 NILITIts te19. 4349. 91. 1tse. 712. V.000U Iva 70e, 21f3, el, )HI. ef0. ICTe11, I31ea 300. 1947. sb. 9117. %"$. /IIYnQ. 04. #A Ottµ 13TeTt 1114t. MO. a7.. 27177, N79. =11T1Cff le9w. 3+791. tell. 1060e. am. ta` %NOrT 3". 1171. U. ITO. IV. 79TIL 3p11.. 433ee.. flow.• 1215e1.• 1tNL• C. W4A V aIfIN IISO I �1411IC3LTIR. tatf"T. 11fr1r� 101.E $0.� e.� oo9.� lots. eetl1CSLT1Nt tvITICt3 tee. 2". , 39. et1. 162. 1nr,r e1. O. /. 1e9. 73. Oa11f1i71ot1 li9ff. 1)910. e99. 2)0ee. 9009. e1,v1CTUI lr sett. 37111111. 139. 361e.3. 9M. AMtg7et,p e10 NILIT113 e912. ib". VO. 2e293. 3177. aftl lobat tool. 9728. W. Tfl9. 991. Orb IL VAN f►9t. I21123. Us. 1=62. oo29. Sookua. Md. e10 1e el QT1Tt etle9. Ill"11. 1111. /6721. Ou".. tPT,as 30ee7,. 99tO9. 3e92. 16Te99. I9M7. ftevteOA M. ,pe, 34. , ss.s. 30. "T,L 193M. A"19. Id". 30149. safe. 0. 1.LI( Awn tt00f it �moveny Rllf, Iteltftf+. I/irlw e010"TALAL 3PT,af Y. $41. 31. Cos SCSI 0 2171. Pos. In. se0e. 1}ji. 0~ACXONG "". ,Nte, sl. 1)ltt. 3260. .. mb"sMT4&T,9\ 110 11111071 :1 3102. IM4. ow. I"a. I1Y. 1+4tL13 "AM MI. )191. 91, ene. fee. 47e4 11km "74. 4111. ))0. '11)". aft. 01O 4a. Not. #A 9L11L t)b?f feM1. 11/N. Mo. e1171. 1)371. TOV'Cls 30"). &Mn). 1e11. 10117. 11917. ®1C911tt1M 317. 1311. It. 1901. 10f. 1[Re1, bHl, 1e39o9. 30e7, 207634. 13"). •Mill", 11MHN1 M .1M -9•11 w w n1W.y. HV1t21 3nIC 4P0 M-60 leale t r11■■■e■r es1e.�■1 of feeraa 141WOMn 11 smof Ilea _ Ked ec/�lee 1= !e'i°' alrlee°le Jtels_ •&sell bale_ 1 led fu uw — s«.w. a_.,_,/ - 11 IN ad„ I■1 � 1.911 �,.N 1" a,N1 111e1 Ita 41 �t1 lea ease!ly_71l 1I• �� ul t.t ua 2.e10 2.e11 �.a1 p,lN r.ut a Iewule■1 11■Ia1N■1 n ftclsw IAIn■rR if ' Hyee 4e.1i•s/lee I�elec fell Lee w--fl lee 1lrleu/� Mlell I Mt f� _pw — Leee �� fMo� iwMw�r•_1 el lil too Mf a.Ne 41 10a 16 1 ttt 1•slt . Its f7e ale 1. 6 f,71f 1.42,MM 00. 1137 Subrnitttd into the ' Public record n connection L•1ii'ill It0i11 0!1 121Lcgov Walter Foenan City Clerk S U C LY U q l.L U � � o U\ _ 2 r, o U - . /Mlle -Oct 1.1111.1e11 11 Mr0 <! IIIVttb/f11t AMAIN erotica / ^WNW* . N/0[OIO. Ae® IAtffM - l KAt I /M - C 11• MIMI Ct•Mtt OAM9 YICIK •gimlet NYI•AlIO N:1Ye1 OIf1A1CI saw It" Q/ fi MfaOKMt III•f• Im ar u•u11s 1.11I 011iaf-IMlltl N&II-•Mot; IM11f-NOt . to,•l la• 1A•t•f0 v ftrl0/0 NO all, • 100 •.•• •.ew 1010 s PC— PC* too I 0.60 - _ . i.•w •:M tO1K e41Mr'O •or ftt/frals 0. M fl•t MI vOIeLAlja" 300 . relMrA Ol tlROMtf l)lee. - _ Marc Iv was tl[ 7021143L. - . AiW tflf CIMtCIES t/f1/e) A,,mo g COftI1CQMtf - C/It CtfMtt OPMAL •IftO1C/ - wook OIf UICI IOIK -. - tO1K MY AN•ML CNt1N11U1f• � • 710N10. • ?NI?71. • 71•e7r, • Into" Mot A."Aft- •r Yr1•e1f w• • bvina•. • trlldl Vt 1 ow to II 1 -N • t:u:er.. •-:Ie�el. • 7..r.•s. • : teeJU. a r.e/�.•w. ao-113'7 Submitted into the public record n connection wih item Oil Walter Foeman City Clerk ! rw" et etMllp'rfal p1A111 Clalle 1 AR - l�I• IINs1'IQ Alm IAICaV 1 11[wUOr - - ll/t alAwl - fell'IK OHINICI 9^09 lle - k'ralll e1HAlt/ Meboa-eA% - IKI'C Or wwt Orlfat ro,Afe1Ma11K I rr l OF errl l laa 1Aq r e 11ilC{Aallt 1414.11{Nlll• rre011 C-rot /O/K ' /"wall OF IMI1e "B"401 e/ e4s/a1e'1lp empWA or P1KApe me IMII Me1YM1 - . t'OrILA1 /OM e. MWryA Or EM10RIa 1714/. . V"nrlwrt MwuL 7e7r7/374. - .. Awq tale CIMUCIC/ Iatlaa AVtAAIC Cm,, IC I(MU - cnt COlbrt WICIAL eulplct samm elelAlcr tO1K Submitted into the public record n connection avin item on 00 —11 3 ( {Halter Fcernan City Clerk ai: 1. ►oltce and file Police service Is provide: to ftie ANelowMt are* trap f.1e City of Miami Pal ice pepert"Wt on NO Ind" Avanua. Arefaga pollee emergency response tlse in is 3 to ! ■IA0451 average rOUflne pollc* repOns@ is 30 minutes. The applicant Indicates fne project .ill Include an on -site security system esbining personnel and electronic Wrvelllsnce am emergency response Including u+ifermed and plain cio+D@s aeewity guards. In addition._ access to building will be aleetronically eon+rolled. City of Miami Fire Oepert*en+ will prowl*@ fire service to the Project from station /t an ME S►-.% str w . e1+] a respMmae tlm@ of Ulder tow •mutes. ThO station Is @Olipad eltl two engine eompmnlas. one marift company. and one rescue Company. and an en -duty staff of 11 persons. City of Miami Fire Department Is also evallable for emergency medlcst service. Randle Eastern Ambulance WviCe -111 provide emergency medical service to Miami Center I as part of +n*If contract wlt'% ty City of Miaml. 14 sponse times for oovn•o.n t+lmml currently average 4 to to minutes. The city is presently developing an lmpde+ fee orolnsco to De Imposed 8+ bulling parsi♦ Issuance. Calculated beseo upon Coats of necessary scai+ionsl f*cIll+es needed to smiptaf+ 23 U L�C KCS Q (V C 'q L U v O C 0 O > v O E mo 13079 G5061 eaadt(onal development In excess of that panned for, _ �— pr000rtlo"Of +o excess aevelopmen+. The firs, department aas' inaicatea +oat +Mls.Project way be.subjec+ +O t4e fee. 3. Enerav The Applicant proposes to use electricity as +.*te primary fuel source. supported by a diesel fuel operated emergency gwnerafor. The total energy Consumption at projeet buiid0u+ Is estlmatod to be 336.4 billion Mt s. or 96.6 million k1l0,stt :+Ours. This Is equivalent to the energy content of 2.2 will ion gallant of fuel ell. Since n115 ,13,61e0rical energy, +iroe J times this mmcum+ of energy (6.7 million gallons of fuel oils j must be COnSuMo* at the power plan+ to provide ♦mis energy to ' the sl+e. Because marginal costs are iigner ♦nan average costs and tie marginal coats for new fsClll+let are Migner tASA tie average Cost of existing facilities, +ie Cos+ Of providing additional eleC+rlClty t0 regional users will be Significantly higher ♦ion tie +ypiC@l COS+$ tOOfy. Md.ever, tMO new Customers tlat Mesa added go"Wr Olon CapeCI+y 00 no+ pay +%* true marginal costs for the added caOK Ity. Indeed, + M overage CGet to all Consumers Increases to Cover +1e marginal COS+ Of serv.►ng now Customers. 21 105 U C L . fCl U o 0 0 U Q U� 5 E (D d Q ►iic. � JQTgPuS�2 All electricity Users In fee Region su0sI0I=e tee colts of Raw Or expd,.doo electrical facilities and the marginal Costs IACurred by ♦tie ufll ity due to Raw Consumers Or InCressea use by existing Consumers. Thus. it is In the Interest of all electricity users In the legion fo'raducs fee energy consumption end Increase the energy efficiency Of users In +ne Region as a way +d refsrd the (Acres$. In average energy costs. CPO way fiat can be done Is to require all new construction. large or small♦ f0 meat adeo,ete energy efficiency standards. l The inclusion Of the energy Conservation measures II$+ed IA S 1; , Condition 11 will reduce fax PFOJOCVS energy use and assist in avoiding adverse regional energy Impact. 1 O. TRA04MRTATIDM I.HroduC+lon In previously review" apolicaflons for develop#en+ avorovsi in +,e Dupont Pleas area (bell Point. Mlami world Trade Cen+er (4nTrust). Soutseas+ bank financial Center. and +ee now expired Miami Center 11). tnnsp0r►et10A es$Ismpf Iona depen"e" On a ♦eret point system COAailting of 1) fne Downtown ►ecois Vaver System, 2) an Imprdveo !tree♦ surface sys*wr, she 31 tea Down+own Cl$tribvfor bifurce+ea romp system +o access 1•" . As we$ mentioned In ♦"sa pram ious review$. the success Of +M downtown Tf onsocrtsflon system (as we11 a$ Me ultimate vispll'ity of any develOpm pnts In +ea Dupont ►laze 23 ■ Ile. I �ozsr� s3 area) 0*06"as an ell ♦lnree points Of 'P%* system being o0arationol prior to full bulloout of ♦.o area. prior to July 1M. In tee absence of an e090000 fair snare trenjportatlon policy tso could effectively analyze and address an b011cewt's Impacts on tpW r. iwprowements. Council requested tmet developers in the Ligon" 0`1424 { area orrange *front -and' loans for *fie bifurcated rap system In Order f0 wads+ In timely 4evelof)ment of needed Infrastructure. Os U bulldout' of t111a orae Is fast ► t crop oetllwg. H seems lq+ Only OruOM but weeassary to mw+10" IhesO newel facilities again.L C U ,v .0 LL r.. Two parts at tie three part system are presently on -ling. or ofe coming in the future. t7eee j on-line near being a version of tsa Downtown hople ihver System and major surfers st/eat improvements, ' TAe Wed leg of t%is system. tae Dowwtown Olstrlb~ I1furc8406 U� � C Remo system. still remains in ♦.-a 010lning stagds. f. i T 4 O E • ss has also bean noted In previous soolitatl0n for Davelopmawt . i Approval review . Cho bail Joint oevatooment was rewleww durlal w i Iong graces$ t0 asses and plan Wr t]e future transporte ion system in the Oupant ►lase eras. ss a result of this t10104 problem a" Im i )4 , on Offer" *0 assist In the timely develoo*ewt of the all miff" property. 1♦ *as agreed net 'the tronsoor"etlom lopec*g 9ewe•rN by Bell Point would be addressed Iw tV "test Ca"Oe► If applics►lom. These Imodcts were address" in *ha supeltted "lesl Center 11 Toal Miicetlon and crisp In t'e issw o "iani Center t1 DOweloeseM l�1 Clot►. As fHe Miami Ctnter 11 nil now eapireo. end f}-4 Cyrrent - Oleol Center project will Crete many Of the lapecfs•of fne expired eppl)c H Ian. fq lmpetts of ♦%q Miami Center 1 development leve been addressed in "is review. .. .- .. .. - 1. �.Istiwc T.aftic T1a project traffic Impact ere& is bounded by 1'39! an try port.s. it, 13"11 %se on tea soutm. 1-91 ow #Ie west. and H scetnt My an tea test (Flgurt a). /I.e roed.ty ii*gmontf on five alfferent resovtys Cur►tnfly Oparete below Lw.s w0'. TStse resovey se¢ents ono t'+tlr respective levels of service dye r Own 1n Table t2. .. • a t _ .. saIs,lr 1&YtIC COOITiOes 4A ►r' raw. 1 >t'J.A." !� s.rww• .f le.n !••wN... of JR4 •oam K .1.w r•ee. q .ram s..eM ) M�oeort �� i �1A f.rew• R �0•w )r•we• ) r i IN ape w~ ei.w. w Ue* 1 f Mir=, W 4 f � 27 A � U g a LL � L m U Q) w ._ 0o s �1 ftj;�- lollpir- �«: 130T�c5066 2. �V*Vr4 P*Ckd►dune Tr 411iD Ie0lC•t Approwlmetely 1103 million In roadway improvements era programaw wit%Im +44 traffic impact area. fw mot. significant Of +lase ImoroVfA0011 include If tie four downtown Olftriboor improv4m4ntt. 21 "a Srickell Avenue bridge over tie Miami 111v4r. and 31 t14 3u NO Avenue bridge Over t.-4 Miami River, INC% noodso tmprov40ent'3 description. year of construction. Cost. end toolicen* fair more It snows in Toole 13. 0. eockoround Traffic 'roiec+tons Uckground traffic grown% t%roug%ovt t" Lode? area w43 projected et -2.4%. compoundsd annually, baled do t N everoge decrease In +rattle v3l Haves 1n +Ne area curing •-4 pas+ five years. Projections war* mad• for 1994. ►o sdoitiona1 road segments would opera+@ below L:S "C' wit, ♦4e addition of 1994 backgrouno tia/Nt. - 3! C,p+mitt44 0wvelo0�4nt Treffie Twenty-fwd 00101+164 44v*IO0w0nts were 10*ntifieo In tse t►effle impoo area. Tyne nawet. IOCetiOn. was. and Kole of 114t* OwsIQ;msnt/ are listed in Table 14. Tie addition o1 co,mwitted tov*loo*M4 traffic to t%o 19W progrrme0 n*twdrk ►etui+t in nd edoitlonal role sag"Mt oo4r4+in2 below LCS I9 lip Q O O Ll •� E�` W .C) LL C O U>L^ y i sr3 O � Q . W If .' . ' 1MOIIM•• Iflee•1. mfiew IN•f17M•/f hJ^1 1�Ile 1_ N=_e W1 . 111.•YI /..e4. fk. left 7w. IN,e••1 - 11...0..E asset I•Nar 1••I L Is Met. •e. r.101 haje.,e /eer1... •1•eit N 11ep MOOD 0-0111, 40" •7 7 MdelMalr Ma.l 1•r.. N = 1 be. wJ.l efyMw 7.IM M M ! :. • - 4�leae NNa1•.I.f DVW1 M.w sr/au M/.M VMwe■.He • •T •.It411 b11•. . � wr Wa_1 Mw afaaar 1,f•1 tl-•1 - • 7 •7 7 • A-10 of Mael Oki". •.e•. le /. M• Met, Ill.. r~ L..Ip► la.M •.11f 7, e1• II►es we flr M! /wI of 84-1 le, I". M. •uq. le M Met. M.e. •-M. •1•► IwN T•,•q ww ••-•/ •7 • 7 T • . 1n /.M ..— at ly. •.v 1•a.l Mw aNa<./Nh. •f •f r • 1.1.1 _ ee• 64 �} `•T •T ' 1 f.N• fw ►r1 111 7 • 4.10 a•rarl /IaaN fe./. so, M��1'trMlit we bW Ilr. f4etlae AM, Mac O 00-113'7 I Submitted into the pudic record in connection Vvith item on Walter. Foenian City. clerk 1 rMtl u •.ra eawll*ro xKt*telofrs SCSI e Bill Otnwe Tw.er Irleyn e.e t office 110.000 . • S1 11.4 street M lewwll Ie. $0.41 Is"we t Ottlee 510.000 *file* Teri - SI lltw street M Ie411 Key 'Cis""" Islam oeHewwf4l/ S00 W/ Mee• 1 Off4e IS.= 14,19ee14 Vr Clelgwrew 10104 110e440w1-e1 lie ou heee 11 Irfeeell Key- Clwgwtow Ielewe oel4wwf41 e10 OY wweN 111 la/ Irlewell I,lcwell e.~ t office/ 410.Wo/ ! Itfw street dell 10.*00 OM ♦Iewell 'Irlc%oll rew,N I ottles/ ee1.01DO/ sowers ! Its, It Scroll 11.= fee /rleeell ♦1e411 e.ew.o t ot.lee/ "J.000/ Twgr ! Ifs Street Notesl 12.Om tlwplw Teeert Irlceefl rnel.y t Vlflce/ TST,eO*/ ' ! Tel Street ee,e11 I=.000 offelyll SfeflM ;r lee 4-efle t office/ 110.'.00/ Tewere A I" street well 11.000 seV►�ee*r /lwewelll oluolM 11.e. t Vines/ 1. 1". MCI Cows IS am brew, Mfel$ II.= II.Ieere states IS I e.ewr t .Mel 120 301two ! eve street u1MeA.r ill A is. ♦w.e t Novell u ter street rtte.*sIe Mlw. 10 Ismr.trw t Ow•. Ottlew/ /OO.OM/ Iwllel.1 r bfe street eotell 60.wo C,owtreov T*mr IS 1e9 &.P1/ t Offlee/ 149.000% IS be $tree, Mien H.k.* Ie.ee.e Teen rot st.w f+ew.* t Offleed HLOOO/ Cliff rle0ler St, filets e.00 •cycle. SNc4tfT Oerfre..t ee•t t Sete. INe11 ISe.40 Cewrr /t etw Street City Ame wl Hreflow Ief bM Owt, attics 31/. dN I.14 i.q of we sH Weer rler4e 111"lewel we bM -6-~ t 0wf, Gift" 149.000 Ser.Iee CM.,r I1 we Sfw $tree• Premise Teter Mete Ileee.we Otte. t ell fie Ube R IM $free, - seV"011- O.ervoee/ We b.e A.. -'A t Cseertlellf iS0,000/ ere ter" » M Street eeeleew,tel I. no Olt Meae 1 Covt1el0e Swore y Is# "A -opus t Ofnee/ ISt,000/ r br $f.ee• Noroll IS.= %*JK=: woe 0►►. 13�T9��069 a, ►roleC♦ Traffic IONpeC-/ a, Trip C3anara�tpn Project traffic was projected based on trip ganereti" ratan derived from tee "1.95 Downtown Oistributer. Deslgn Traffic forecasts." According to *te report., the trip generetlon rates war* standard ITE rates wit', adjustments wade to reflect trip making in the urban setting at various times of day. Anse trip ganaration rates are afa.n In Tsb i e 15. TAW to veto too al/lwsTla GARS Lw* Use Loll TI � iyo office 1000 S.F. WA ].SOT 3.1&4 11109811 toed S.F. era 6.3" 9.000 N.sf Nr■I solo 1.439 1.%7 j1. 40 (■Mt, 1000 S.F. VA - 1.73$ f.US 50.00 Gnaw! O.811 1.292* tt,ft >fsJfC[1 80 0, Prefect Traffic erolectlens The addition of l"A project traffic to tw progrs*eo roadway Mtwork would result in, no addltlonel rpsaver sa9aents falling below LOS '0". It llftvio be noted. fowever. that the project'$ traffic assignments as well as 1904 roadway levels of servlca era substantially bawd on 32 Ca , C a) U Q c= r ccf O1-^ C C a r— Too 'P'al • lA•Ir f r CIMAAIIII ILN /IAr 11r11 MM/IC . Ar �I r[Apr M.L, K Mr f11 r/ r/ for 111r1 W orl Arwrtr 111 K Llr ff1r/ K /Nr f11r1 M IN A.... of ■ IIr1 f11r1 M It1A f1/r1 fr Ir1 f11Ar/ of M ISO Arr.r NMI A r ff f11e.f ft Irl A.O w 10r1 A. w b11rce lyy •r 11 A.11 Ar r.� 1/ $Sob So/r1 1( IMA fltwl 1` M I46.I l A.— 41. , • q•. Sr 74.d A.wr M rf.w f)11•r •1-1 A.w rl.w •t lh. fr tort 111r1 Y Ir A.r.w fr MI Atr..r f/ •1• f11rf II Irf Arrw IL1r1r11 Y /N f11«I H/ltf.lf Mr$ brr SAACI1 ALA. WPM 00-113'7 M1w/1�. �i..� If•f I.Ir/ly 1•�__ If •.cN 1•f•~ ItA/ Cs_III.L I9r1 Mr1 /r/w /.Ir/ly �64-;.w _ •_ 1'M IK INS f 1 c AA C • • r f • • C C f f I / f C C I I r r • • C C C / A C • A A I r • Of I • IS f I t • C A • A • r 1 I : • f 1 C • • � : • • ( I • • A A • I • 1 I I A • • r ) A • • • A SuE);-nitttd into the public record n connection 4vih item Oil Walter Foeman City Clerk 2 OA111 11 ClpeellW IIN f ,* wY RM/IC ftl f fry- M •IrK_-�1« 1— 1«1 f-�1ti I COI ••Itne..� IfN C�III.r IfN 111«1 Crfw rl•lly—_fir •1.[\/r MN. w • % siffrl 1/ p\ !If«I gas qrr� M A e • _� .t ISO e..y 111 w If\ Iff..I " C C C If 14-d A.*-. 111 M list iff«I 19 1h\ Neste ! f C 1 ! 1 f• 1.1 !If«I lf1 Y Id bar w—1 bfr• I ! A e • • • w 7r. $ff«I 8 IN be ! c • • • • Iff • Islf.r.. 0-0 r A A • & IC►.11 e.S.S k Isom, Ih«1 If 1«\ 10.«1 • • " e • A r s 1 ! I • A A • •f IC..Il A. w /l.v r 1A1. • • O • s � c • C c !r 7.1 burr 111 al.. �1e1. " A . • • r s 1 1 A A • A , e MI �.1 brr . Il..r �111. " C C • r s ! ! II/" • A e • !• IN saf..l :y bf�.. s l fr1 A.«_ 1 A A e • Of IM pr«I ! 1.1 bar OwkMll ! e A A A A w 116 SIf M/ b k411 w-1 bf w� f - e e A A A A r � c SIfA[f 1 eM. w0c O SUL),Mitted into the Public record n connection With item on 1 ® (.(11 _ ♦ 1 ry Walter Foeman I City Clerk i ►c: 1 30T9PuS0T3 Oepertmant,of Trensportatlon.. I+ Is Important to rote +tat it ++ese moaificstlons are no+ incorporafso Into on alrsedy planned " programmed ♦ronsooHetlon Improvement, then many of tie traffic assignmsnts eno projected top4 leveis of service for rosaway segments in t.*4 impact area will not_lolo true. 71ie improvements as olscUfied by t1e CUoont plsla teak force• are smwn .in Table 1g. in .Sddi+ion to fleas Improvwunts. Pie AapllceM proposed ,(i) convarslon of a portion of 11* eastbound bifurcated ramp from ambanlment ano retaining wall +o so0lttonal structure langta to allow passenger car and van clearance for access to the local service roadway. (1) fie Biscayne Baulev rd Vey SOW1 site service read. &no (31 *Irir geometric improvemon+s st tie SE 2nd Avenue soo Biscayne Boulevard ray Intersection. No extension to +1e ess+Douno btfures+ed ramp Is proposes. The proposed modiflcstions are snows in Figure S. Table 10 lists ♦!se effe-+s of ♦ae pro;ec+ aM Improvements an critical In+sraec+low& wi+lies +1e traffic Impact eras. • Tie Oupon+ plasm task forte Is an sovlscry g►ouo consisting of members of local goverment. ♦ne )r►ropolltew /lann;ng Organilatlon. end ilorlos Department of Transacr+stiow. 36 �� 1 U .0 Ccri Y CL m .0 w u- ci a`) U O .. CU .r O .O U� E �J O 060, ►��: I �;0T��50T5 } 1 FIGLF E 3 D DISTRIBUTORD MODIFICATIONS To THE DOWNTOWN BIFURCATED RAMP SYSTEM gMQIMNG THE 3 AD= APPUCAW RECOMrEJM �kpfiOVElvQdfS ul, ut ff _., m = • ! _ ✓ : m i • � ` rrr i I I tutu •j •ice � +� '• » m 1 r ' �• j tilt, y 11L iswortaon ao mwtvroo�* " � . MIOYO�f► at F . ��t: I30T9�GSOl6 Tna additional Costs for ♦ae rwo alteration Is tnet of Y extendlAg t1e two-Isne structure spororiaefely fifty feet. t_ This cog+ would be part 1011y o/Ise♦ by oflalnatiny the need for progratwed docks signalltstlon and a modest ?&auction In rig." of way redulramen+s along Biscayne boulevard ray for the COmbinad rsalp and surface street roed•ays. Incidental additional Costs would be Involved In tee rasp teralnua V 1✓ 'L "treg+aMt Mar Biscayne /duleverd. Excluding right-of-way, fM_ � w [ U not .difference In Construction Cog+ Is approximately $80.000. L The 8001f10081 Cog+ for Construction of 0 separate sou*♦ floe O C r — f service roadway along Biscayne 600evard Would, In part, be U� offset by reducing rye number of reautra.d t,%rougd lanes on' ?� C y ._ biscsyne Soul w and "my fraw three to two. Mare Curb Me - T a guitar? drainage $tructur$a. and paveart are needed wit, ♦CIS !` O alteration I. -tan was anticipated wltn the GDA staff proposal. CO L- Altnlouga sidewelr wet not $mown oe /N sov" alas of Biscay"& Boulevard My 1n the MA Staff proposal. 11e Dupont Plots Task Force has Indicated teat It would be desirable. and It probably would have bean Included in a finalitad MA plan. Sidewalk Is Inclueso In tlis proposal. The net difference In construction Cost between t%Q plans Ito gel" a south sloe service road and free floe mevea&ntf Iron ♦he eeStbound /lap and tna J-%Voigl � A lanes an Biscayne BoulwSrd way) is Sooronlaately f3S,000. i d 39 IZO w3 F , -e«. j 1 3�T9�C50TT Tse minor geometric revision at f,e Si.2nd Avenue and !llscsyn• . pHulevard May InterNCt1011-to provlae Cmnnallift-{oa, a -better rsalua return. and resulting (n (wprOveO t►efflC flow, mould �1] aaa no wore ♦hen 13.000 adattloobt to the reaowey proposal 1 prepe►e0 for fne Dovntovn Develoomen♦ Auf-orlty afaff. ' Table 21 lists sae tires A0011cant-provdew Improvements MCCeo • 10 OCCO ANSta prOjeCt ImpKfs. ♦help COst AM the '1'p011CMt'J fair snare. . IMPALA. 31 I011.rIa+1 .+M.1` s A M Nowpb.. VP"7Na U uwAn3 w SYM -club .7 .¢9ww•.R *+All? 'aw.3 ' wrw.w.r Of • n Yr. o, mwnIi, 1 b1.m11 1 M.aw) M.= %ow If.mwl 911.000 s.w a.V•N P f !.. ). m0 ).Zo ....any w.a n11.ew n11.em • f, "Woo Am. SPUR .. . yConslOeretion et the timing at heeded improvements to tw existing roadway Mfwort 19 CowpllCatea le tlla Innanca doe t0 1 +.a.feetors. The firilt relates to the assign Of ins progrewnea Downtown Distributor lifureetea Ramp system. while is Florida Dope►luent of Transport*+ion has been proc"atng wl" a final i assign. ♦as FWT assign (sae Figure 6) does not InCluOe •as L N C C U C. a'3 FKKM .6 CLMENr FDOV DESIC" FOR, THE DOMTOyM DISTRIBUTOR BFURCATED RAM:) SYSTEM Z ZZ "Is owl. SE 3 RD off oil 11 A/A 1111111 sOLF*,M- MOT srnm 0,.0-1137 Submitted into the public record in connection with item On -L21L�41-02 Walter Foeman rihi O«:: 130T9FJ' S 79 mooiticaflons discussed by the Dupont PI gas talk force or •rose COnfa(nad In t1e AOOIICant's proposed design.. The second . relefes„t0 tte timing of the ramps;pnst►uctldn. originally,, - ... Ile project was scw ulsa for fne current fiscal year. Due to federal cutbacks and O►Mr circumstances FWT f4w projects the completion for solo, fa)vaver. It remainsuncertain.•wndfler t.'s timing Of fan Completion'of the rmspa will be coincident •itn ' ♦10 A00fIcant's proposed project phasing. Under normal . . I circumstances. encountering a situation sucl as 'tnis one vOuIa result In a reCawlend at)on for project denial and staff v0yio . love'reaue/tea that tM- Apo 1lcant valumterIIy delay Counc)i's-- - eonsidereleA pending ►esolutlon of tnese major problems. )Ideever. working rlfn tie City. FOOT and t1* developer tnros -tnings are spooronts 1) that mast of gloss problems can be resolved In the near future) 2) 11* project Is economically Important t0 the regions and 3) ton devel comp! s time is constrained regarding project financing. Tlerefors. staff 1as - agreed, at ton Pool -kent''s re0uest. t0 address approval of - Interim phasing Of trie proposed project IMapanaent of oasis" at coincl,0ance eltn the offurcatea Ramp system. in *rasp to boll accurately assess ♦ee Impacts caused by Interim pnases Of . ton project (in ton absence of fne bifurcated ramps) and to i I reCowmand adequate miflgetion Of ♦nOM impacts. The surface - /traft network. along eltt the Orellminsry surface street improvements suggested by the City Of Mleml's Public tarts •2 i V .0 f13 Q 3 L" Q 0 N _O C CO C O O . :3 U 'E W .� efr�074 �1�.. 1 380 �. 0soorteuent. was. e@ssineo for tse year 1991. The year 1"l was - Cbjen because If reflects the most probable year of occupancy for haws I. The examination was basso.on tee following assuaapflonst I) anIy one of tea Applicant's two proposed t struCtur@s would be Constr:uCted. 2) tee It furCated P41op system would no+ be In place. 3)-moo form of interim lapisveenitS to SE Second Aven1D_@nd .project entrance areas would be undertaken by tie 0@veiopse. 4) no additional developaen+'In ♦fie 3_bloCY U = C ; — Cd �.. are@ directly west of +ha propOje* project site soul* take place In the absence of the bifurcated rps, and S) soma form em 0-C Q) C.. of Interjection loprorwlent wool* be performed along SE 2no _ . L; i Street. Unknowns In our analysis are +he precise In+@rIM O G CU O Improvements n@ad@o to ensure sds*usts levels of Service, p►:Jr C p — V` to the development and conatructfon of tee blfurtatp remp 'p .0 .� system. These particulars are Steil In tie planning ones@$. += :e ans final Improvements en* costs Pre +9 be *eteralnso by t City of Miami. lbwver, these or@ primarily local rosdw@ys and N a prelialnery list of potsible Improvs■@n+s, as deter@Ilned by ten Cttv's pepartment of Public Works. Inclua@at . . i A. CYOOn+ Plaza Impr Ove■"4$ 1. SE 2n4 Avenue and SE are St►ee+ Tom, AdjuS+ most Curb on public land on.soutabound iapprOK1 an* oojus+ traffic signal +@@ds a$ reoylreo. +0 C►ea+e ►our versus pressn♦ +4ree S*Vt b ,,a - �t i a} i iti.off Q( �uJIJU tnrowgs IMu. lane Grog to be Sully SCCdr.beetee sdut� e/ Intereeetten .IMin existing oave>tlen• Mrougn it" turn at h sesyne Boulevard Way prior to Brickell Avenue bridge epproet-i. Woolty SIOnlnS 160 striping tro►oYgnOvt NCtlan as redulred. 2. _kg Avenw MS SE 2na Pee Adfuft Chan0e1110ie6 Curbing In sovt'sesst corner •o provide two w9otboun4 "rougn tense end t*vreo pepsrete toff turn lanes. plus one free flow left lyrn Isne inside Modified C:+Snnelltatlon ISISnd. Two Of t.0 lot+ turn Imes far WAS$$ to i�� Mt►M:: rgep Elder S2 2nd Avenue ON SE 3rd Street, One Mandatory and OR* optlansl. Adfust*Ont Of C.WAOI 114t10n Islene in sdut-iteest Corner to al eo el low t\ree soutlbound ttroug-1 I Mat• ♦►ansitlened t-iroug• I-ersOCtlon wit" skip guide does. (one Msndatory rlg"t turn lad and two . tnrougn lines Currently in place.) ReviN signal ndsd dlspleys. pecestrlen features. over.'Ned via atner signing. and lieveeent Mefkings as required. 44 U C� .y c it C E c CL o a) $. LL �— C j O C 00 C O -0 a) O . s�6E U � }? `IC: 130MG.5082 .:. Uof coy". ►lot$ Protect [n+rence Entrance eno tilt drives to.0e coordinated wi+t mitlmets 0ifurcated rang design am City of-Mlaml WOiic Works Cmoartment. . dpnefric alterations at project drives near Biscayne Boulevard way and Illscayne loulevera way. T.NIs is to Include revised drainage as necessary. outside pavement widening wi+aln existing rlgyf of way. slgn41126+100 of exit drive to be instelled wren we►ranPad. and revised pavement meetings. Also provide custom material and construction top approxiasfely 1.M0 feet of si0ewalks 410ng projec• steel frontage end rivervel'k frontage. end all sealing, llglmting. and Iandsca►ing• all for public use. a. Biscayne Boulevard Vey Access fioad.ey -Cl+y to preserve present pu0lic rigat of way for aepalate !B' sastbound access r0adway sowtl of Biscayne Boulevard Way +a extend from SE Ira Avenue +0 Biscayne /lase project sOO'm vMICular traffic enf►ants. Itesarvetion to sx+end a+ leas+ t0 do+e 06 completion of projet+ fr►sse 2. (Sepefee access roadway mot 4"OW necessary +0 pro;ec+ Base 1.) a� _V C c C E (V i Iv .O LL O cc C RJ C C O Ory � C CU . J E O C) E C/5 2? i Submitted into the public recor in onnection withitem �� on -/ - �b Walter Foeman City Clerk OEL: F 1001 18:34 No.014 P.02 RPC/bko 7/24/7b /24/79 r • RESOLUTION W0.1 0 - 5 5 13 A ABSOLUTION CALLING AND PROV7PXNC FOR A BPECIAL MUNICIPAI• BLRCTION TO BE HELD 09 THU leTH DAY OF SBPTEMB%R, 1979, FOR THE PURPOSE OF SUSMITTING TO TUB QUALIFIED BLSCTORS OF Turf CITY 0? MIAMI FOR THEIR APPROVAL OR bISAPPROVAL, A MRASURE KNOWN AS "CHARTER AMENDMENT HO. 1", AMENDING SUCTION 7(f) OF THE ChARTHR OF TILE CITY OP MIAMI, FLORIDA, BY PROHIBITING THE LEASING OR %AXING OF MANAGXURN•r CONTRACTS FOR ANY CITY WATERFRONT PROPERTY VITH PRIVATE FIRMS OR PU RSCNE, WITH THE RXCRDTIOH Or (1) THE CITY OF MIAMI/UNIVFRSIT'Y 07 MIAMI DAMES L. YNIGHT THTLRNATIONAL CENTER AND HOT91, FACILIT?, INCLUDING ALL I%PROVIiMCHTB THUREON, (2) -ANY PROJECT, TUB FINANCING OF WBICft HAS BEEN PROVIDED RY T119 AUTHORISATION 00' BONDS TO IIC ISSUED BY TUB CITY OF NIANI, WHICH LkA2E4 AND CONTRACTS WOULD PREVENT REARONABLY PUBLIC ACCEEd TO THE WATUR OR WHICH WOULD MOULD PREVENT PUBLIC USE OF SUCH WATERFRONT PROPERTY, Oft WHICH WOULD NOT RESULT IN A FAIR R97URW TO THE CITY BAStD ON TWO INDEPENDENT APVRAISALB, OR WHICH WOULD PBRXIT 093 OF SUCH PROPERTY NOT AUTHORIZED UNDER THE THEN EXISTING MASTER PLAN Or T"t CITY OP NIAN2, OR WHICH LEASE OR CONTRACT WAS NOT SUBJECT TO COMPETITIVE BID OR CONPETITIVC NEGOTIATIONS. SAID CHARTER AMENDMENT ALSO PROHIBITING EXTENSION OR 01001- PICATION Of ANY EXISTING SUCH LEASE OR HAWAGE499T AGREEMENT WHICH DOTS NOT COMPLY WITU EACH OP THE ABOVE RSQUIRPHANTS, UN4E88 SUCH PROPOSED EXTENSION OR MODIFICATION NAG FIRST DUCE APPROVED BY A NAJOnITT OF THU VOTERS OF TNs CITY O%P MIAMIr AND A NBASURC KNOWN AS "CHARTER AMENDMENT 00. 2", AMENDING SECTION 1(4) OP THE CHARTER OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BY PROVIDING Fox SUI(.OINC PLACSPENT LIMITATIOXG UPON PROQERTY LOCATED ON BISCAYNE BAY OR UPON THR MIAMI RIVER rRON ITS YIOUTH TO TEE W.U. STU STREET BRIDGE, IN OROCR TO PRESERVE INK CITY'S NATURAL SCENIC BNAUTY, TO GUARANTEE OPEN SPACES. AND TO PROTECT THE WATERFRONT BY IMPOSING MINIMUM FRONT AND BIDE SETSACX REQUIREMENTS, SURJNCT TO WAIVER UNDER CURTAIN CONDITIONS AND PbRTHCR SUBJECT TO CERTAIN EXCEPTIONS. iy u�Q014� , 0 ? 1r EM NO WHEREAS, the City Commission, at a regular meeting duly called and held accvrdinq to law on the 20th day of .7uly, 1979. duly paasod and adopted Resolution no. 79-5ol•, Causing the drafting Of o proposed Chartar amendmont to prohibit the to:sing for aomisercial use of, or making nanageeant contracts for any Clty waterfront property, axcapt the City of Miami/University of c4iami Jamas�L. Knight International Center and hotel facility, including all improve - vents thereon, whic), 1r4sett or contracts would prevent pu►il;�- wcceea to the water or which would prvvcnt public ued of such waterfront t property, or which would not result in a fair return to the City hamed Submitted into the public recoril nnectio with item on Walter Foeman City Cled< =,. EL: . • • • F 11'01 18:35 No.014 P.03 ,, f, on two apprainalet or which Would permit sae or such property not authorized under the Chen existing maoter Plan of the City of Ni&mi, unless such leaoo or contract be subject to competitive bid or competitive negotiationa; said Charter amendment also pro- hibitinq .extenuion or modification of any existing ouch leasa or managomont agree,eet,t which does not comply With each of the above raquirestents, unless such proposed extension or modification has first boon approved by a majority of the voters, which proposal is referred to herein an Charter Amendment No. It and, WHEREAS, the, city Commission at a regular meatiug 4uly called and hold according to law on the 20th day of July, 1979. Aulp passed and adopted Resolution No. 79-502, causing the droftinq of a proposed Charter amendment to provido for oecugancy limitations upon designated waterfront property kq imposin%• minimum front and side setback roquiramonts subject to Waiver under cortain conditions and subject to certain exceptions, which proposal is reforrod to herein as Charter Amendment No. 11 and WHEREAS, said proposed aaandeants Shall become effective in the event that they are approved by a majority of the y;;olified electors of the City of Nieai voting at a special:. municipal election held for the purpose of enabling said electors to register their approval or disapproval of said praposed amendmentst and WHEREAS, it is appropriate and necessary that the City Commission make provision for holding said special municipal vloctioni NOW, THERUPORD, 81 IT RESOLVED BY THE COM1t118EI0ts OP THE CITY oV NZAN2, rLORIDAt section 2. A special municipal election iv heroby called and ditectod to be held in the City of Miami, Florida, from, 7800 A.M. until 7.00 P.14_ on Tuesday, the 18th day of September.. 1979, for the purpose of submitting to the qualified electors of the City of Miami for their approval or disapproval a m90 sdre Known as Charter Amendmont No. 1 and a treasure known as Charter Amendment No. 7. Submitted into the public record in connection+ with item on Walter Foeman Cites Clerk . . OU-1137 ', • —�TE!_ F�?11 ' 01 18 36 No .014 P .04 • Section 2• Said Special eunieipal election shall bo held at the Voting places in the precincts designated, all as shown on i the list attsebod hereto and made a part hereof and referred to as Exhibit No. 1, or as say be designated by the supervisor of Tslectionn . E., of Da4o County, in oonforinity with the provisions of the general laws of the state. A description of the registration books and record* which pertain to election precincts wholly or partly within the City and which the city is adnptina and desires to uac for holding Much Special munlclpol eloction to as follows All reyistratiou cards, books, cccor<b and certificates pertaining to r electors of the City and oetabltshud and a4intained as official by tho supervisor of Elections of Linde County, it( conformity with the provLsi.ona of the gunoral lawn of the State, are hereby adopted end declared to be, ari4 shall horuattor be recognLEod and accepted an, official rogtstrativu cards, books, record^ an4 cortltieates of tho City. Section 3. The official ballot to be uhed at 54id shoClal ® bo in full laws sunicipa1 election shall compliano4 with tbo of j the Stato of Florida with respect to absentee ballots and to the uan of Computer biection system (C£8)- ' i Z Section 4. in compliance with Florida statute 100.342, the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to publish once a week for 4 Conaecutivo weeks during the 3o day period prior to the heroin election notice of the spocial reforandun election as herein not forth in the followirtg newayapars, at1 of which are published within the City of 1/1ami. Florida: t - THg NIAMI HERALu - 3 THIS HIAMI NDWS DIA&TO LAS ANERWAS THE MIAMI TIMES i THE LIBERTY Ncws, said notice being substantially as forth in the following forms _3- Subrnitted into the. public reca d In conned n v�ith • - . Walter Foeman City Clete j 00.1137 L: Feg1'01 18:36 No.014 P.05 • • NOTICE OF SPECIAL REFiRENDUM ELECTION To BE HBLD Od TOSSDAY, SEPTEKBER 1e, 1979 IN Tkh CITY OF MIAMI, FLoxfDA A special reCerendum election will ha held on Tunaday. Soytember 18, 1979, for thepurpose of submitting to the qualified olectori of the City of Miami, Florida, the following guettionst "CHARTER A-1£NDMENT t10. 1: ,hall 9oetion lif) of PhH chartar of the City .of Miami bo amandad Dy prohibiting tho Jvarminq for commorvisl utto of, oc maxiny o! mann4o4t@nt uonteaetx for, any City waterfront propvrty, wit)I tlt•� axcerstloo or (1) Tht: City of glaml/t;niv4rnity of :liaini yamutt i.. Fnlght Tuturnztloual Cvnter and ttotcl facility includl❑q all improvon�,uta thereon, f2) any,projvvt, thu Clilanciuy of whlcl► has boon providud by tha author Liar Iun of boridy to bi, istauod by tale City of ;41ami. erhs.clt leaso6 or cotttraetS would hrovont roaaunaDle publl: acce4t to the watue or which would prevotit public uBv of nuali waterfront prol,vrty, or which .uuid s;ot result to a fbir return to the: C')ty basea on tvo i.udoponduat appralesis, or «bich would permit U30 nr quch prop4rty not authorized undrr Llac• tit(,,, 4xistiny miatcr Plat. of the City of 7•;iutnl, ar witich Lt:asc; ar contract wait .,Or fubjact to cuul,ui:(tiv4/ hid or CompCtitivO n1-'90tl,1tiOo-tt said Ci'+.trtvr imendmvnt u),uo proltlbltlnq extr.nr,lon or ctodi- firaL)on of any 0xi9t1tt9 suatt Lvaov or nanageaui►t agrc'!-mrnL Alicia doaK trot Comely with coral of Cho .above rucuirimcnty, unlotts such propo-tod dxtonxion or modiflcarion haw rirct heoo approved by O majority of t!ic votorss of tho City of ulami7" 'C11AkTER AXE`iWIUNT No. 2; Shall 5cvtiou 3(4) of thu Charter of the City of. Miaml bo azondod to provkdc for building plAc0MgDt limicatioliv upon land locatgd on Blecayno Bay, or upon the N1ami Rlvur from its mouth to tho N.N. Sth Street aridgc in order to protarve the City'c natural $conic beauty, to quarantov opan spacas, and to pro - tuck the Katerfront by ivtpouing minimum front and side sotback rvyuiruments, *object to waiver upon ecrtaln condltlor,a and further subject to.cortain arteoptions?" 96Ction 9. Electors dasiring is vote for the approval of xaid Qunstlonu described abova sthail be instructed' to punch straight down Aitli tliv atylt:x throuyh titu hold nvtttk to the word "POP" vltltln tho ballot frame containing the statement relating to vach said Question) and, electors desiring to vote egainset said Questions shall be instructed to puah straight down riah,the stylus Lhrougb the hole next to ttte word 'AGAINST" within tine ballot ftamo containing the statement rolating to Cach said Question. 10. submitted into the public recor co n nnection with -4-IQJ item on��-�cu t - - ;r• rk . Walter Foeman 4 i. L: Fe 1' 01 18 : 3 7 N o. 014 P. 0 6 r';: - ,•+ section 6. The City Clark shall causa to be prepared ah9entoa ballots eonlaininq theQueutiotia cat fortis in Sectik-- 4 above for the use of absent electors er,r.itled to catt such ballnts in said election• t Section 7. All qualified electors of the City shall be r. permitted to vote in said special rounicioal election and tits suporvisor of Elections of Dada county la harsby reque.tted, Authnrixod and dircctcd to furniott, at the cnst and ozpon?:o of tho City of Mialel, a llut• of all yualiflt:d ulcvtoru i:: the City of Aiumi aY. ohav,i by tho ragistr:,tion books .t.d,,roaorde of his or her office and duly to certify . the save for delivery to anti use of tho eloctloh offiecre desinnutod to r.orvo at the respective polling hlAcoa fu uaid vloctlon preeinccat. j section d. RALPH C. OUCL E, thx� Cffy Clork of the City of Oilami, Florid4, is hereby doaidnat.ad and 41.pnictua as the official rvprot:ont.,tivo of thu City CoI4mjN:tihn in all tran„actions with the Rupurvinor of BiectiVltN or Didt, county In r014tinu to teartJr9 portaln- lag to the ude� of the r.-•lijirration bnoks and tlto holding or viald apuclal municipal cicction. Scction 9. T11, proPor officials of tho City of Miami 4nd Uade County art, horolly author:roA and directed to submit maid quv*tior1% to tho olectorato at thy Beptomber iB, 1979 Apocial,municipal cicction and to certify tho reoul} thorcof to the Comniesion of the City of Xiami, Florida, and all acts pertaining to caid.eloctior- heretofore purforrnud by said officials art: hereby ratified and confirmed. PASSED AND ADOPTED this+ 34th day a[ --AAIY, 1979. F _ _ Hd4r1C a A. Ferro MAURICE A. Zr ut w M A Y O R FALPHC. ONUIE, CITY CLERK PRE AR\FD ANU APP oV Y t SUbMit d Into the public P'^-� ?' record min connection with ., 1i0B6RT F, CGARK, ASS267'AN7 CITY ATTOANe�te4i1_G�--�pQ�n VQ; CD AS 20 M AND QR1tECTNSSS: tlVdltP'r FOemaR f' City Clerk ~1' G60 K F. KNOX, R., ITY ATTORNEY r wi rr m.:y..a•.i:Jr ."x.r•i: .. ... _ .. .... . .. .. .. .... .. .,=„!?',l.L_. aft:-�.:,....._..,,..- ..,:.... ., ..._ ,• . ,.. ,... . , _ . _ _ ,:.�, 00 -1137 EL: Fqdk 1'01 18:38 No.014 P.07 • 0 •6�2 RESOLUTION NO. gg A RESOLUTION DICLARING AND CERTIFYING THE RESULTS. Of THE SPECIAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION HELD ON SEPTE11- SER 18, 1979 FOR THE PURPOSS OF VOTING FOR THE APPROVAL OR DISAPPROVAL OF THE FOLLOWINCt (a) CHARTER AMENDMENT NO. 1 WHICU PROPOS$D AN AMENDMENT TO SECTION 3(f) OF THE CITY CHARTER TO PROVIDE FOR A PROHIBITION UPON THR LEASING OF OR THE MAKING OP MANAGEMENT CONTRACTS POK ANY CITY YATHRFRONT PROPERTY WITH PRIVATE FIRMS OR F9880NS, WITH THE EXCEPTION UP (1) THE CITY UP NIAMI/UN1VVR8ITY OF MIAMI. JAMES L, KNIGHT INTERNATIONAL CENTER AND HOTEL FACILITY, INCLUDING ALL IMPROVCMENTH THEREON, (a) ANY PROJECT, THE FINANCING OF WHICH HAS BEEN PROVIDED BY TNR AUTHORIZATION OF SANDS TO BE ISSUED BY THE CITY OF MIAMI, WHICH LRASBS AND CONTRACTS WOULD PRXY9NT REASONABLE PUBLIC ACCESS TO THE WATER OR WHICH WOUI.n PREVENT. PUBLIC USE OF SUCH WATERFRONT PROPERTY, OR WHICH WOULD NOT RESULT IN A FAIR RRTURN TO THE CITY BASED ON TWO INDEPLNDEAT APPRAISAI.R, OR WHICH WOULD PERMIT USE OF SUCH PROPERTY NOT AUTHORIZED UNDER THE THEN L'XISTING MASTER PLAN OF THE CITY Or MIAMI , OR W►IICH LEASE OK CONTRACT WAS NOT SUDjECT TO COMPETITIV& BID OR COMPET(T1V5 NEGOTIATIONS; SAID PROPOSED CHARTER A14¢104&:/T ALSO PROHIBITING RXTENSION OR MODIFICATION OF ANY MXIST19G SUCH LEASE OR MANAGEMENT AGRE&NCUT WHICH DID NOT COMPLY WITH EACH OF THE ABOVE REQUIRILMENTS, UNLESS SUCH PROPOSED EXTENSION OR MODIFICATION SHALL FIRST HAV9 BEEN APP#OVZD BY A MAJORITY OF THE VOTERS OF THE CITY OF MIAMI'. AND (b) CHARTER AMENDMENT NO. 2 WHICH PROPOSED AN AMENDMENT TO SECTION 3(4)_OF THE CITY CHARTER TO PROVIDE FOR BUILDING PLACEMENT LtMITATIONS UPON PROPERTY LOCATED ON BISCAYNt BAT OR UPON THE MIA.9I RIVER FROM ITS MOUTH TO THE N.W. 5TH STRgET ARIDGB, IN ORDER TO PRSYERVS THE CITT'S NATURAL SCENIC BEAUTY, TO CUARARTt'E OPLN SPACES, AND TO PROTECT THE MATERY909T BY IMPOSING HININUN PBONT AND SIDE SETBACK RSQUtREHCWIS, SUBJECT TO WAIVER UPON CERTAIN CONDITIONS AND FURTNSR SVBSCT TO CSRTAIM EXCEPTIONS; SAID ELECTION RESULTIXC IP APPKOVAL OF EACH OF THE SAID PROP0990 CHARTER AMU ONRNTS. "DOCUMENT INDEX WHEREAS. a special nualclpat election was duly hold in the City of Miami, Florida on SeptoAbor 18, 1979; and WHEREAS, said election was duly conducted in accord - Once with the provisions of the "Electronic Voting Systems Act" (F.S. 101.5601 through 101.5615); and WHEREAS, the official rerurna of each,o£ 67 election Precincts in the herein election oC septeRber IS, 1979 6eve CRY COMM SM ' Submitted into the publIC NEETM OF; f000rd in connection with SEF�vt • item aon Waiter Foernara . 00-113'7 *TEL: F 11'01 18:38TNo.014 P.08 • • RESOLUTION NO.., 79-s32 A RESOLUTION DECLARING AND CERTIFYING INK RESULTS OF THE SPECIAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION HELD ON SEPTEII- BER 18, 1979 FOR THE PURPOSE OF VOTING FOR THE APPROVAL OR DISAPPROVAL OF THE roLLOWING: (a) CHARTER AMENDMENT N0, 1 WHICH PROPOSED AN AMENDMENT TO SECTInN 9(f) OF THE CIIY CHARTER TO PROVIDE FOR A PROHIBITION UPON THE LEASING OF OR TEN. MAKING OF MANAGEMENT CONTRACTS FOR ANY CITY WATERFRONT PROPERTY WITH PRIVATE FIRMS OR FERSONS, WITH THE EEC9rTION OF (1) THE CITY OF MIAMI/UNIVERSITY OF 144!14I. JAMES L. KNIGHT INTERNATIONAL CINTER AND HOTEL FACILITY. INCLUDING ALL LXPROVBMENTS THEREON, (2) ANY PROJECT, THE rIHANCINC OF WHICH HAS DEEM PROVIDSO BY TDB AUTHORIZATION OF BONDS TO BE ISSUED BY TH& CITY OF MIAMI, WHICH LEASES AND CONTRACTS WOULD PREVENT REASONABLE' PURL EC ACCESS TO THE WATER OR WHICII WOULD PREVENT PUBLIC USE OF SUCH WATERFRONT PROPERTY, OR WHICH WOULD NOT RESULT IN A FAIR RETURN TO THE CITY BASED ON TWO INDEPENDENT APPRAISALS, OR WHICH WOULD PERMIT USE OF SUCH PROPERTY NUT AUTUORIZQD VNDF.H Till THEN EXISTING MASTER PLAN OF THE. CITY OF INIA:It, OR WHICH LEASH OR CONTRACT WAS NOT SUBJECT TO COMPETITIVE BID OR COMPETITIVE KEGOTIATEONS: SAID PROPOSED CUARTSR AMENDMENT ALSO PROHIBITING EXTENSION OR MODIFICATION OF ANY EX15TTNG SUCH LEASE OR HANAGL'NENT AGREEMENT WHICH DID NOT COMPLY WITH EACH Of THE ABOVE REQUIKENSNTS. UNLESS SUCH PROPOSED EXTENSION OR NOOEFICATION SHALL FIRST HAVE BEEN AP(ROVED DY A MAJORITY OF THE VOTERS OM THE CITY OF MIAMP; AND (b) CHARTER AMENDMEHT NO. 2 WHICH PROPOSED AN AMENDMENT TO SECTION 1(4) OF THE CITY CHARTER TO PROVIDE FOR BUILDING PLACCHXNT LIMITATIONS UPON PROPERTY LOGAT6n ON BIScAYNE BAY OR UPON THE, NIA.MI RIVER FROM tTS MOUTH TO TUB N.W. STET STREET BRIDGE, IN ORDER TO PRESERVE THE CITY'S NATURAL"SCENIC BEAUTY. TO GUARANTEE OPEN SPACES, AND TO PROTECT THE WATERFRONT BY IMPOSING 111MEHUM FRONT AND SIDE SLTSACE REQUIREMENTS, SUBJECT TO WAIVER UPON CERTAIN CONDITIONS AND FURTHER SUSECT TO CERTAIN EXCEPTIONS; SAID ELECTION RESULTING IH APPROVAL OF EACH OF THE SAID PROPOSED CHARTER AtICNOHENTS. "DOCUMENT INDEX WHEREAS, a apectal municipal *&action was duly hold is the City of Nievii, Florida on September 18, 19794 and WHEREAS. s id election was dul7 conducted in accord- ance wttb the provisions of the "Electronic Voting Systems Act" (F.S. 101.5601 through 101.5615); and WHEREAS, the official returns of each of 87 election precincts in the herein election of September 18, 1179 have CM COMM" 1 ,Submitted into the public MUTM record in connection With SEP20SM item- on Walter Foeman City Clerk �EL: F 1'01 18:39 N0.014 P.09 • 7 9. r3 RESOLUTION NO._-.. A RESOLUTION DECLARINC AND CERTIFYING THE, RESULTS Of THE SPECIAL MUNICIPAL P,LECTION HRLD ON SEPTBt:— sER 18, 1979 FOR THE PURPOSE OF VOTING. FOR THE t APPROVAL OR DISAPPROVAL OF THE FOLLOWING: (a) CHARTER AMENDMENT NO. 1 WHICH PROPOSED AN AMENDMENT TO SECTION 9(f) OF THE CITY CHARTER TO PROVIDE FOR A PROHIBITION UPON THE LEASING OF OR THE MAKING UY MANACtMENT CONTRACTS FOR ANY CITY WATERFRONT PROPERTY i UITH PRIVATE FIENS OR PERSONS, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF (1)•Tllz CITY OF 211AHI/UNIVERSITY OF MIA41, JAMBS L. KNIGHT INTERNATIONAL CEYTER AND HOTEL FACILITY, INCLUDING ALL IMPROVEMENTS THEREON, (2) ANY PROJECT, �f THE FINANCING OF WHICH HAS NS64 PROVIDED BY THE AUTHORIZATION OF BONDS TO BE ISSUED BY THE, CITY OF 1 HIAHI, WHICH LPASES AND CONTRACTS WOULD PREVENT REASONABLE PIIgLIC ACCESS TO THE WATER OR WHICH WOULD PREVENT PUBLIC USE OP SUCH WATERFRONT PROPERTY, OR WHICH WOULD NUT RESULT IN A FAIR RATUKN TO THE CITY BASED OM TWO INDEPENDENT APPRAISALS. OR WHICH WOULD PERMIT USE OF SUCH PROPERTY NOT AUTHORIZED L'\OISR TH4.THEN EXISTING HASTER PLAN OF THE CITY OF HIAM1. OR WHICH LEASR OR CONTRACT WAS NOT SUBJECT TO COMPETITIVE BID OR ComPETET1VE NEGOTIATIONS: , SAID PROPOSED CHARTER AMENDMENT ALSO PROHIBITING RXTENSION OR rSObIFICA'TLON.OF ANY EXISTING SUCH LEASE Olt NAXACENENT ACRESHENT WHICH DID NOT COMPLY FAITH EACH OF THE ABOVE REQUIREMENTS, UNLESS SUCH PROPOSED EXTENSION OR MODIFICATION SHALL FIRST HAVE BEEN 1 APPROVED BY A MAJORITY OF THE VOTRAS OF THE CITY OF MIAM1,; AND (E) CHARTER AMENDMENT NO. 2 WHICH PROPOLED 1 AN AMENDMENT TO SECTION 3(4) OP THE CITY C8ARTS1R TO ® PROVIDE FOR BUILDING PLACEMENT L14ITATIONS UPON PROPERTY LOCATED ON BISCAYNE BAY OR UPON THE MIAMI � RIVER PROM ITS MOUTH TO THE N.N. 5TH STRf4T BRIDGE. IN ORDER TO PRESERVS THE CITY'S NATURAL SCENIC { BL'AUTY, TO CUARANTRR OPEN SPACES, AND TO PROTECT TN8 WATERFRONT BY IMPOSING MINIMUM FRONT AXD SIDE SETR.ICK REQUIREMENTS. SUBJECT TO WAIVER UPON CERTAIN CONDITIONS AND PURTHBR SUBBCT TO CERTAIN EXCEPTIONS; SAID ELECTION RESULT190 IN APPROVAL OF EACH OF THE SAID PROPOSED CHARTER ANENOXENTS. "DOCUMENT INDEX T pj WHEREAS, a spacial municipal cloction was duly hold in tha City of Hiasl. Florida on Septovibvr 18, 1979i and WHEkEAS, said election was duly conducted in accord- once with the provisions of the "Electronic Voting systems Act" (F.S. 101.5601 through 101.5615); and WHEREAS, the olficiul returns of each of 87 cleetion precincts in the herein ulectiou of Septonbsr 16, 1979 have the public emr.cvww,ssm SOibmitted mto vvlth MUMS OF ection " conns in SEP'vro record cin ® item- Walter Foeman Gety Cleirk Submitted into the public record 'n connection with Item on W4�- Walter Foeman City Clerk W P, CD --t NO-113 g 3 CHARTER AND RELATED LAWS Subpt. A to be contributed for maintenance of the fund. (11) Airports and landing fields: To acquire by purchase, lease, condemnation, or otherwise, lands inside or outside the city limits for use as landing fields or airports; to con- struct and equip thereon or on other prop- erty of the city such improvements as may be necessary for that purpose; to operate and maintain such facilities; to provide rules and regulations governing their use and the use of other property or means of trans- portation within or over the same; and to enter into contracts or otherwise cooperate with other government entities or other pub- lic or private agencies in all matters relat- ing to such facilities; otherwise to exercise such powers as may be required or conve- nient for such establishment, operation, and maintenance;" to levy taxes for any such purpose; unless such facilities shall have been acquired by lease, to issue bonds to is pay the cost of such facilities; and to grant, deed or dedicate lands, with or without con- sideration, to other governmental entities for use as landing fields or airports. (Laws of Fla. (1929), ch. 14234) (mm) Building and zoning: W To provide by ordinance building, plan- ning, and zoning regulations and re- strictions governing the height, num- ber of stories, method of construction, type, and size of buildings and other structures; the percentage and portion of the lot or site that may be occupied; the size of the front, rear, and side yards, courts, and other open spaces; the lo- cation, use of buildings, structures, and land for trade, industry, residences, apartment houses, and other purposes; and the widening and future widening of streets in zoned street areas that the city may establish. Such- regulations may provide that a board of appeals or the City commission may determine and vary the application of building, plan- ning, or zoning ordinances in harmony with their general purpose and.intent. Supp. No. 21 (ii) In order to preserve the city's natural scenic beauty, to guarantee open spac- es, and to protect the waterfront, any- thing in this charter or the ordinances of the city to the contrary notwithstand- ing, neither. the city nor any of its agen- cies shall. issue building permits for any surface parking or enclosed struc- tures located on Biscayne Bay or the Miami River from its mouth to the N.W. 5th Street Bridge, (A) which are not set back at least 50 feet from the seawall (where the depth of the lot is less than 200 feet, the setback shall be at least 25 percent of the lot depth), and (B) which do not have average side yards equal in aggregate to at least 25 percent of the water frontage of each lot based on average lot width. (iii) The above setback and side -yard re- quirements may be modified by the city commission after design and site -plan review and public hearing only if the commission determines that the modi- ficatioq} requested provide public bene- fits such as'direct public access, public walkways, plaza dedications, covered parking up to the floodplain level, or comparable benefits which promote a better urban environment and public advantages, or which preserve natural features. Wherever setback, side -yard, or site -plan review requirements of zon- ing ordinances are greater than the foregoing requirements, such greater requirements shall govern, (iv) These requirements shall not apply to docks and appurtenant structures, single- family residences and appurtenant struc- tures, and waterfront industrial uses along the Miami River and at the Port of Miami, Nothing herein contained shall in any manner affect or apply to: the City of Miami/University of Miami James L. Knight International Center and hotel facility, including all improve- ments thereon, or to lands and projects which the city commission has approved Submitted into the publIG recor in 8 Cdnni CtsCDl� fNi'!'1 item- on waiter C y Clerk 0 0 -113 7 • • • Subpt. A CHARTER prior to September 18, 1979, by devel- opment order pursuant to chapter 380 of Florida Statutes of.a planned area development pursuant to article XXI- 1, City of Miami Comprehensive Zon- ing Ordinance or which have received site and development plan approval, including Plaza Venetia, Phase II, Reso- lution No. 72.113, April 20, 1972; Res- olution No. 72.114, April 20, 1972; and Resolution No. 72-416, July 20, 1972. (nn) Borrowing to erect and add to public build- ings: To borrow money for the erection, con- struction, and furnishing of public build- ings, including hospitals, city office build- ings, city halls, and other municipal struc- tures; to borrow money for the purpose of -building additions to public buildings now owned by the city; to execute notes and other evidences of indebtedness, and to se- cure the same by a mortgage upon said buildings and the land upon which the build- i ngs may be located; to pledge and hypoth- ecate the net revenue, after the payment of all operating expenses and fixed charges, including interest on the debt so created and on all other debt created in the con- struction of such building, as well as to pledge and hypothecate the net revenue derived from such buildings and the land upon which they stand, all for the purpose of securing the repayment of money bor- rowed to be used in such construction; to issue certificates of indebtedness secured by the net receipts from the use or rental of the buildings or additions to present exist- ing buildings erefted or to be erected for public purposes. Notwithstanding the fore. going, no tax shall ever be levied nor money taken or diverted from the general funds of the city for the payment of the indebted- ness authorized by this section. (Laws of Fla. (1933), ch. 16561) (oo) Borrowings to provide adequate waterworks system: To borrow money for the purpose of providing an adequate waterworks system, including new water lines, and for the pur- pose of repairing, .improving, and extend- Supp. No. 27 f §3 ing the existing waterworks system; to issue promissory notes and.certificates of indebt- edness, a;id to secure same by an assign- ment of all net rentals and net revenues, after the payment of all operating expenses and fixed charges, including interest on the. debt so created, and all debt created for the construction of such work, derived from said waterworks system or any portion thereof, until moneys so borrowed shall have been fully paid; to mortgage the entire water- works system or any portion thereof to make necessary repairs; and to pledge the net revenue derived from said system, until said money shall have been fully repaid. Not- withstanding the. foregoing, no tax shall ever be levied nor money taken or diverted from the general funds of the city for the payment of the indebtedness authorized by this section. (pp) Borrowing to purchase, hire, maintain, op- erate, or lease public utilities: To borrow money for the purpose of constructing, pur- clzasing, hiring, maintaining, operating, or leasing local public utilities, including street railways„ electric light lines, and equipment necessary for supplying the city and its in- habitants with transportation, illumination, power, water, ice, and gas for heating and illuminating; to mortgage the public utili- ties so constructed, purchased, hired, main - twined, operated; to issue promissory notes and certificates of indebtedness evidencing the existence of the indebtedness created by the borrowing of said money; to pledge and hypothecate the net revenue, after the payment of all operating expenses and fixed charges, including interest on the debt so created and all other debt created for the construction of such works, derived from the opefation of such public utilities so con- structed or purchased, including said net revenue derived from such street railway, electric light plant, telephone and telegraph system, and water, ice, and gas plants; to pledge such net revenue until the money so borrowed shall have been fully repaid. Not- withstanding the foregoing, no tax shall Submitted into the public record in connection vj',"h .s item on 1? � i `�cl_W 00-1137 Walter Foeman City Clerk (7� cl, If • • ONE MIAMI SUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENT TOA PRIOR MAJOR USESPECIAL PERMIT Prepared by . ARQUITECTON/CA ' CONSUL -TECH ENGINEERING, INC. CURTIS ROGERS DESIGN STUDIO, INC. DAVID PL UMMER & ASSOCIA TES GREENBERG TRAURIG, P.A. ' SHARPT ON, BRUNSON & COMPANY Submitted into the public record�item 'n cOnnecti� with on 2 September, 2000 Walter Foeman City Cleric . 00-113'7 • [t,'i� do r: t +r am .���` �. • • i�G + . • + ?,;`a 46 Ift rs 1}r ♦ _4 i•ti '` fly. {""1 �iy,,� �Y :M. � y`' � � —q• �r-a. Yi.. `. 2' � ,, a+l -�i ��C �A!'����44 :y4 � }_.yjyi �_ tiM �0 tom.. V'. ti•� .` ^, f`�. 1••'.. ��. . i ' y..ti '_"�.osk..T'�"'ri�'�: a+-'._ i'�y' `,� �':� �� ti. 'u�'r .a'a �~ dam' � ti. `� �..s e; � •�y _. "` �"n;'- ..r „yx3f,�2%J "'� ^.. �1'[•'�.` s�"''tytC:=. iF'ti" -e,, ��'. P.+6 .�.r♦ � , •,= V tr• � �r ..s ` :..;- -f C S _ r,� '"` �.O aY �, r F'•'Ti..'i'�-'' yyY. � � .'rin� •� ♦ '.�.4�,t� +s` • J +Ly y ti � 1 ` �"�' h•'3r fw `�• i `-�• .`I °�?�'i.{�`..'i5�,� `��•� � a'^ �r�;.. J �~ � 1�1�• �Tn• i � `• ..� `': try' 1���.by .\_�.1+� • � of !, . �.. �1,�_ ' r � � ~{ • ; _T ��s,M� y�,'� L�� �3Y��� �vM �f�".'"+T' � f T � i � • y., +,+•;-w« ,'a m...� - 1` i o � 'k iy 1s`i - fiYL�. ,y, ��'►�� _ :• '�. r .r.,•�.j ,. -•.l ��. N"* �L �ti •! ,' y:�.k'L�"�7.+J yC `� .�-.y�,� .:.�,y,}l�~w��.'-i f„ti�}vR�j c�^�F.=� ,�,�,��-[�K �t '�La J {+ 'r� •+�.r. .►..._.j'`, .+. ��'.' .PF �,' y ,,�.: �± �`' �'*7,.'y��%'cVs� - :�+�i�'�11C��`a�, i_. s• •r �e � �l � ;-wi, ���Tw' "y-'. .•w.;-^ 'ak1. r.;�'�t�;� _..r�r,:.L•' ~�5'�' ��t S'`•w„ �S'` s uoS-^�' , � r � '7 � i a``'!' C7 • September, 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS i. Project Information A. Letter of li itent B. Application for Amendment to Major Use Special Permit and Special Exception Application C. Zoning Write -Up D. City Commission Resolution No. 96-1151 E. Aerials F. Zoning Atlas Page 36 G. Project Data Sheet H. Computer Tax Printout/Deed !. Ownership List J. State of Florida Partnership Documents K. Directory of Project Principals L. Owners Authorization Letter Il. Project Description A. Zoning Ordinance No. 11000 1. Section 1304.2.1 Applications Forms; Supplementary Materials 2. Section 1702.2.1 General Report 3. Section 1702.2.2 Major Us�,Special Permit Concept Plari 4. Section 1702.2.3 Developmental Impact Study l[I. Supporting Documents Submitted into the public record in connection with Tab 1 Minority Construction Employment Plan item �_ on 2 /,AG Tab 2 Traffic Impact Analysis Walter FoemanCity Clerk 00-113 7 • • • �BEfNBEflG ............. iBflVflIG Lucia A. Dougherty (305) 579-0603 E-Mail: doughertyl@gtlaw.eom September 7, 2000 Ms. Teresita Fernandez Clerk, Hearing Boards City of Miami 444 S.W. 2nd Avenue, 7"' Floor Miami, FL 33130 Re: Letter of intent for One Miami Dear Ms. Fernandez: On behalf of The Related Group of Florida, a Florida general partnership, we are submitting an application for an amendment to a Major Use Special Permit ("MUSP"). The MUSP,, owed by the City Commission on Nov ember;17,`1998 pursuant to Resolution No. 98-1151. The enclosed application requests:.1) approval of a 425`dnit residential building, a 707.025 gross square=foot office building and a 1,-834 space'parkirig garage; 2) that the MUSP Amendment to be issued for this project, provide that this project will be bifurcated from the prior approved MUSP Resolution No. 98-1151 and therefore; all conditions will be included within the new MUSP and any future amendrrients and/or modifications, will not require the approval of the property owner(s) which are included within Resolution No. 98-1151; 3) request for a Phased Development per Section 2502 of Ordinance 11000, and 4) a waiver of the City's Waterfront Charter provision pursuant to Section 3 (mm) (iii) of the City Charter. The Charter provision requires a setback of fifty (50) feet from Biscayne Bay and the Miami River. The residential building is setback thirty (30) feet from the seawall on the east side adjacent to Biscayne Bay and the residential and office buildings are setback between thirty-four (34) and sixty-four (64) feet from the seawall adjacent to the Miami River. The One Miami project is providing a twenty (20) foot public walkway along the waterfront of the entire parcel, as well as a proposed water taxi. stop. The public walkway will include benches and a lookout area. Should you have any questions, please call me at (305) 579-0603. Thank you,very much for your attention to this matter. Very trul yours, LuAA.gherty MIAMI/PARDOA/976832ftg8Ol!.DOC/9/o6/o0 SU8i1ltte�j into the ' bpublic recoro, in connection with Ifiem on 1 LI Walte r F®eman ItV GREENBERG TRAURIc, P.A. 1221 BRICRELL AVENUE MIAMI, FLORIDA 33131 . 305-579-0500 FAX 305-579.0717 www.gtlaw.com .MIAMI NEW YORK WASHINGTON, D.C. ATLANTA PRMADELPEIIA TYSONS CORNER Sx0 PAULO • • CITY OR ML4MI PLANNING DEPARTNENf APPLICATION FOR MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT Submitted into the piihlic record in connection with Item, on Walter Foeman City Clerk IT IS INTENDED THAT MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMITS BE REQUIRED WHERE SPECIFIED USES ARID/OR OCCUPANCIES INVOLVE MATT`P.5 DEEMED TO BE OF CITYWIDE OR AREA -WIDE IMPORTANCE. THE CTTY CONINIISS10N SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR DETERMINATIONS ON APPLICATIONS FOR MAJOR USF SPECIAL. PER.NaTS. (SEE AR DCLE 17 OF ORDINANCE 11000. AS AMENDED, TrfE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY Of' MIAbQ FLORIDA.) THE CITY COMMISSION SHALL REFER ALL APPLICATIONS FOR MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMITS TO THE PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD AND TO THE DIRECTOR OF THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT FOR RECOMMENDATIONS, AND MAY MAKE REFERRALS TO AGENCIES, BODIES, OR OFFICERS, EITHER THROUGH.THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT OR DIRECTLY, FOR REVIEW, ANALYSIS AND/OR TECK* ICAL FiNDNGS AND DETERMNATIONS AND REPORTS THEREON. (SEE SEC77ON 1301.5 OF ORDINANCE 11000 AS AMENDED, TXE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CrIY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA.) SECTION 2-613 OF tHE CODE OF THE CITY OF MIA]rII, FLORIDA, AS AMENDED, GENERALLY REQUIRES ANY PERSON WHO RECEIVES COMPENSATION, REMUNERATION OR EXPENSES FOR CONDUCTING LOBBYING ACTNITLES TO REGISTER AS A LOBBYIST WITH TI-C CITY CLERIC, PR10R TO ENGAGING IN LOBBYING ACTIVITIES BEFORE CITY STAFF, BOARDS, COMMITTEES AND THE CITY COMMISSION. A COPY OF SAID ORDINANCE IS AV AIL1IBLE IN TrIE OFFICE OF THE CM' CLERIC (MIAMI CITY FALL), LOCATED AT 3500 PAN A1.IERJCAN DRIVE, WAIrn, FLORIDA, 33133. NOTE: THIS APPLICATION MUST BE TYPEWRITTENAND SIGNED IN BLACK INTL 1, I, L uc i s A, D o u a h e r t y, o n b e h a L f o f,*hereby apply to the Director of the Planning Department of the City of Miami for approval of a Major Use Special Permit under the provisions of Article 17 of the City of Miami Zoning Ordinance. *The P.e'Lated firoup of Florida, contract purchaser and Miami One Centre, L.P. owner Property Address: !n5 ri(ltlf'Cl R4crpVno Mr,t.!.aNlpr•a Nature of proposed use (be specific): A r e n u e s t for an a m e n d m e 6 t to a prior a p p r o v e d Ncaior Use Soecial, P-merit whirr Ccmmission r)ur-tan :o PesoLutIOn No. 98-1151. See attached Exhibit "1" for the Zoning Write—Uo. APPLICATION 1VIATERL4LS Submitted innnection with to the public dco i actacn the followrt recoring in suppoand explanation of the application: item .,�,�.L vn J- 2 A`d- E Walter Foeman f 1. T�,o orizinal surveys, prepared by a State of Florida Registered Land Surveyor within onQ�year;,frdm the date of application. 2. Afildavit disclosing ownership of property covered by application and disclosure of interest form (attach forms 4-83 and 4a-83 to application).' „„ o 7 'PPLICATION MATERIALS (continued) h the following in support and explanation of the application: Q 3. Certified list of owners of -real estate within a 375-foot radius from the outside boundaries of property (attach form 6-83 to application). (y] 4. Maps of the: a) Existing zoning designation. b) Adopted comprehensive plan designation for areas on and around the property. Q 5. General location map showing relation to the site or activity to major streets, schools, existing utilities, shopping areas, important physical features in and adjoining the project, and the like. p 6. Concept Plan a) Site plan and relevant information per Section 1304.2.ld-h. b) Relationships to surrounding existing and proposed futures uses and activities, systems and facilities, per. Section 1702.3.2a. c) How concept affects existing . zoning and adopted comprehensive plan principles and designations; tabulation of any required variances, special permits, changes of zoning or exemptions, per Section 1702.3.2b. 7.. Developmental Impact Study (an application for development approval for a Development of Regional 0 Impact may substitute). L 8. Other( be specific): © 4. Fee of $ 45, 000 , for the Major Use Special Permit, based on current fee schedule as set forth in Chapter 62 of the Code, of the City of Miami, as amended. ❑ 10. Additional fee of S -0 , for any required special permits, changes of zoning or variances set forth in chapter 62 of the Code of the City of Miami, as amended. Total Fee: S 45 , 000 S i enature . Submitted into the public Name (�,r;a A. Doucherty- . record in connection with Address 122.1 Sri ,c k e L L Avenue, Miami, FL item On � Phone/Fax 3Q 5 - c7o_Q6-ar3 i —rr 5�t4 61- F�r13 Walter Foeman City Clerk Date cc op temhor 7. 7nnn APPROVAL OF TIZS APPLICATION FOR MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT SHALL CONSIST OF AN EXECUTED RESOLUTMON V THE CITY COMMISSION AND A DEVELOPMENT ORDER ATTACHED THERETO WHICH SPECIFIES THE CONDITIONS UNDER W. IICH THIS I. USE SPECIAL PERMIT APPLICATION IS APPROVED: IF APPROVED BY TILE CITY COMMISSION, SAID RbSOLUTI0 AND D' . _LOPMEN7 ORDER SHALL, UPON EXECUTION THEREOF, BE TRANSMITTED TO THE OWNER OR AUTHORIZED AGENT AT THE .'•.DDRESS SPECIFIED ABOVE. STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of September 200.0 ,by Lucia A. Dougherty who is personally known to me or who has produced as identification and who did (did not) take an oath. Name: i Notary-7551rc:�Sta' era ^, a T MA S 1 J Q:::, •,',, r. :)F FLORIDA My ommission,Ezpife§57/71- 8 1rr++f+++rw+r-f+#++rerrr++r ef++# w r#rf+++rlf rr# �rrrrr+rrr+r-f++srNM►+++#+#'r+w++r4+1`fb++#r+r++rf r++r#•rr ruff STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20 , by of a corporation, on behalf of the corporation. He/She is personally known to me or has produced as identification and who did (did not) take an oath. Name: Notary Public -State of Florida Commission No.: My Commission Expires: ffr+e#e+e+rf+rKrf+iA f iff+f•fifi#rf-Mff#f#f##f}flfHff#+6+ff+Irtfff##!f#ffY#f#ff-/�yr�#rfyf+lM-++#-►fffff+f }1#-I4 STATE OF FLORIDA ' COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20 , by partner (or agent) on behalf of , a partnership. He/She is personally known to me or who has produced as identification and who did (did not) take an.oath. Submitted into the Pecord in Public -�•,cnnection with item f.-=-�_ on Walter Foeman City Clerk Name: Notary Public -State of Florida Commission No.: My Commission Expires: 3 K, G1�Y OF t •� rieosr ootTto �, cO,F�o� CITY OF MIAMI OFFICE OF HEARING BOARDESSubrnitted into the public recur m onnection vvI h item /�� on Lys APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTION Walter Foeman City D er,< ANY'PERSON WHO RECEIVES COMPaNSATION, REMUNERATION OR EXPENSES FOR CONDUCTING LOBBYING ACTIVITIES TO REGISTER AS A LOBBYIST WITH THE CITY CLERK, PRIOR TO ENGAGING IN LOBBYING ACTIVITIES BEFORE CITY STAFF, BOARDS, COMMITTEES AND TIRE CITY COMMISSION. A COPY OF SAID ORDINANCE IS AVAILA,?:LE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK (MIAMI CITY HALL), LOCATED AT 3500 PAN AMERICAN DRIVE, MIAMI, FLORIDA, 3313.3. NOTE: THIS APPLICATION MUST BE TYPEWRITTEN AND SIGNED IN BLACK INK. IT WILL BE ACCEPTED BY THIS OFFICE ONLY THE FIRST SEVEN (7) DAYS OF THE MONTH. APPLICANTS ARE RESPONSIBLE, IF NEEDED, TO BRING AN INTERPRETER FOR THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE TO ANY PRESENTATION BEFORE ANY BOARD OR COMMITTEE AND THE CITY COMMISSION. x/Vithin the City generally, or within certain zoning districts, certain structures, uses, and/or occupancies specified in this ordinance are of a�nature requin.no special and intensive review to determine whether or not they should be permitted, in specific locations, and if so, the special limitations, conditions, and . safeguards which should be applied as reasonably necessary promote the general purposes of this Zoning Ordinance and, in particular, to protect adjoining properties and the 'neighborhood from avoidable potentially adverse effects. It is further intended that the expertise and judgment of the Zoning Board be exercised in making such determinations, in accordance with the rules, considerations and limitations relating to Special Exceptions (see Article 16 of the Zoning Ordinance). Formal public notice and hearing is mandatory. for Special Exceptions. The Zoning Board shall be solely responsible for determinations on applications for. Special Exceptions except when otherwise provided for in the City Code. All applications shall be referred to the Director of the Planning and Zoning Department for his recommendations and the Director shall make any further referrals required by these regulations. Lucia A. Dougherty, on behalf of The Related Group of Florida, 'I, contract ourehaser and 'liami One Centre, L.P., owner_ hereby apply to the City of Miami Zoning Board for approval of a Special Exception for the property located at 205 South Bi s c a y n e B o u l e v a r d , folio number n1 -ni 1 i—n7n— 1 n1.1 Nature of proposed use (please be specific): See attached Exhibit "'I In support of this application, the following materials. are submitted: 1. Two original surveys of the property prepared by a State of Florida Registered Land Surveyor witthin one year from the date of application. 2. Four copies -signed and sealed by a State of Florida Registered Architect or Engineer of site plans showing (as required) property boundaries, existing (if any) and proposed structure(s), parking landscaping, etc.;.buildina elevations and dimensions and computations of lot area and buiidino spacing. 0-;-1.'7 E 3. , Plans need to be stamped by the Office of Hearing Boards and signed by Public Works, Zoning and Planning prior to.submission of application. 4. One (1) 8 Y2 x 11 copy of the signed plans attached to this application. 5. Affidavit and disclosure of ownership of property covered by applications and disclosure of interest from attached to this application. 6. Certified list of owners of.real estate within a 375-foot radius of the outside boundaries of property covered by the application. 7. At_least two photographs that show the entire property (land and improvements). S. Recorded warranty deed and tax forms for the most current year available that show the present owner(s) of the property. 9. Other (Specify and attach cover letters explaining why any document you are attaching is pertinent to this application): 10. Cost of processing according to Section 62-156 of the Zoning Ordinance: Special exception I $ 800.00 Special exception requiring automatic city commission review.. $2,000.00 Extension of time for special exception S 500.00 Public hearing mail notice fees, including cost of handling and mailing per notice S 3.50 Surcharge equal to applicable fee from item above, not to exceed eight hundred dollars ($800.00) except from agencies of the city; such surcharge to be refunded to the applicant if there is no appeal from a property owner within three hundred and seventy-five (375) feet of the subject property. Signature Submitted into the public Name Lucia , A. D o u g h e r t y recor J ink' connection with ' item on I -a. /- Address 1 7 7 1 B r i c k e L L A v er u e Walter Foeman 1 City Clerk Miami, Florida 33131 / Telephone (305) 579-0603 Date Seotember 7, 2000 00--1137 t, DISCLOSURE OF OWNERSHIP 1. Legal description and street address of subject real property: 205 South Biscayne Boulevard See attached Exhibit "2" for legal description 2. Owner(s) of subject real property` and percentage of ownership. Note: Section 2-618 of the Code of the City of Miami requires disclosure of all parties having a financial interest, either direct or indirect, in the subject matter. of a presentation, request or petition to the City Commission. Accordingly, question #2 requires disclosure of shareholders of corporations, beneficiaries of trust, and/or any other interested parties, together with their addresses and proportionate interest. See attached Exhibit "3". 3. Legal description and street address of any real property (a) owned by any party listed 'in answer to question #2, and (b) located within 375 feet of the subject real property. See attached Exhibit "4". Owner or Attorney for -"Owner Lucia A. Dougherty STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day, of G�` ✓ -'L �1 2000 by Lucia A. Dougherty who is personally known to me or who his produced as identification and who did (did not) take an oath. Name: , Notary P ic�tate�f F.lofid„sEAL Commis on My Com fission spiresA— OF or`�Al :Xr.ScC'r-148 17.2M ® Submitted into the public record in connection with Item on Walter Foeman O ` 3 7 city Clerk Submitted into .the public record in connection with OWNER'S LIST item e�5r__ on �L► Walter Foeman .'s Name . City Clerk M , Address Zip Code Telephone Number L e2al Description: .noLicant's Name The Related Groun of Florida wailing Address ?.^..�? C o r a L U''a y, M i'a m i. F L o r i da Zip Code 331 c; ; elephone Number ezal Description: wner's Name laing Address Zip Code e Number zat Description: v other real estate property owned individually, jointly, or severally (by corporation, partnership or privately) within feet of the subject site is listed as follows: Street Address Legal Description Street Address Legal Description Street Address Legal Description 00- 137 • • .AFFIDAVIT Before me, the undersigned authority, this day personally appeared Lucia A. D o u g h e r t y , who being by me first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and says: 1. That he/she is the owner, or the legal representative of the owner, submitting the accompanying application for a public hearing. as required by Chapter 55. of the Code of the City of Miami, Florida, affecting the real property located in the City of Miami, as described and listed on the pages attached to this affidavit and made a part thereof. 2. That all owners which he/she represents, if any, have given their full and complete permission for him/her to' act.in his/her behalf for the change or modification of a classification or regulation of zoning as set out in the accompanying petition. 3. That the pages attached hereto and made, a part of this affidavit contain the current names,_ mailing addresses, telephone numbers and legal descriptions for the real property of which he/she is the owner or legal representative. 4. The facts as represented in the application and documents submitted in conjunction with this affidavit are true and correct. Further Affiant sayeth not. Applicant's Signatu e STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20 60 , by 1-0-c1- c, A. r7��-�-_ who is ersonally known to me or who has produced as identification and who did (did not) take an oath. � 10 51R. Na e: too. Submitted into. the public r rtr' recur—' No�ry,Public.-St"ate�of=F{ortt3'a connection with . Commission No.: item on /� My Commission Expires: i#valter Foeman C4ty Clerk -17 entry, for_upper levels and a second 2-lane entry for valet parking on ground floor. i The service access for both towers will be off Biscayne Boulevard, on the -north side of the property. One of the two lanes will be used as the parking garage's express exit during rush hour. One Miami will also be accessed by pedestrians from downtown Miami and 'the= Bridkell Avenue. area, as well as by boat from the Miami River or. Biscayne Bay. The plaza surrounding the Property will create a pedestrian friendly urban environment. Pedestrian traffic for the project is primarily accomplished by the wide pedestrian wall. -way along _the Miaiii River acid Biscayne"Bay, which is - separated -from vehicular- traffic but" connected with the buildings at severs! points. This pedestrian walkway will include a "siting place" at the west end (Biscayne Boulevard) and a "view place" at the southeast corner. Secondary pedestrian traffic is also provided along the vehicular circulation on the buildings' -side. A detailed anaylsis of the site access and traffic flow is provided in the Traffic Impact Analysis located under Tab 2 of the Supporting Document. 4. Off-street parking and off-street loading areas. The off street parking facility is located within the parking garage levels ground floor through If" floor. The parking structure will have 1,534 parking spaces, which will support the entire development. The garage is shown on Sheets Al. la to Al.6a provided under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. The Zoning Ordinance requires six loading bays, (4) 12' x 35' and (2) 1.2 x 55', all provided on the Ground/Floor Plan, Sheet A1.2, under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. S. Recreational facilities locations. The 13'h level of the parking garage building will serve as a recreation deck for the development and will include indoor and outdoor amenities. The indoor recreational facilities wilt include: exercise rooms, spa, Jacuzzi, lockers, bathrooms and showers. Exterior facilities will include a pool, two tennis courts, garden and sun deck. There will also be a cafe and bar, as ' ,vell as a garden and trellis covered. pergola. Thus, creating the atmosphere of a courtyard for the use of the office tenants and residents. Submitted into the public record in connection .with item Z.'S on /v—oa Walter Foeman Citv Clerk. 00-113'7 Class I :Special Permit as per Article 9, Section 906.6, for poolloutdoor Class 'I" Speai I`Per nit as Article 9, Section Section 917.2.1, to allow valet parltipb for residential and other uses. Class i "Sp eciaii' Periivt -as •=per _Article _9, Section .25r.8, tto slld�v develo_pmentleanstructionlrental signage. Class I` Permit as per Article-9 :--Section. 91-8.2., .for- parking_ and staying of construction during construction. Class Y. Permit as per Article 9, Sectionction 920.1, to allow- construction trailer. y Request for the following KUSP conditions to be required at time of shell permit instead of at issuance of foundation permit a.. The requirement to provide a letter of assurance for the Solid Waste Department; and = b. The requirement to record'i'the Public Records a Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions providing that the ownership, operation and maintenance of all common areas and facilities ,will be by the property owner or s mandatory property owner. association;. and c. The requirement to record in the Public Records a unity of title or covenant in lieu of unity of title_ Designation as a phased development pursuant to Section 21502 of Ordinance tio.11000. Request forwaiver of Waterfront Charter permission per section 3(mm) (iii) of the Charter. r Jjy& McPhee Zordag Inspector II a� DAte Submitted into the public record in connection with item .S on Walter Foeman . 00 _ 113 ,7 Cite Clerk Submitted into the public record in connection with item -s on =L4 -oe Walter Foeman 0 0 _ 113'7 City clerk Exlu Disclosure of Ownership for Miami One Centre %jW(VP,QLOOAJ1 16817VP 1 tOO P.MCM130100/99999 45771.1 H A Submitted into the public record In connection with item on f-2-1'(-O Walter Foeman 00-1137 Citif Clerk . - Exhibit'T' OWNERSHIP STRUCTURE _Eyr[TY a ;The Related-GroupFlorida . A Florida General Partnership " = General Partner Related Florida, Ltd: ;Limited Partner -:Related General of',Florida, Ltd, 49.50%., Re fitted- Ltd::. A Florida Limited Partnership Corporation General Partner-- Related Florida, Inc., 1.00%. Limited Partner' Jorge M. Perez; Relnted Florida, [tic. A Florida Corporation:, Jorge M. Perez - :100% Shareholder - Officers: . Jorge M: Perez = President- _..- . Roberto S. Rocha - Senior Vice President Angel A. Hernandez -'Assistant: Secretary' ' 1828 Coral Way - Penthouse Miami, Florida 33145 (305) 460-9900 EtiTITY Rein ted Genertl or Flo ridA, Ltd. A Florida Limited Partnership General Partner - RCMP, Inc. 1.00% Liruted Partner - The Related Companies, L.P. 99.040/6 Officers: Stephen M. Ross - President James Flood - Executive Vice Presidentof j Susan J. McQuire - Secretary 625 Madison Avenue New York; New York 10022 (2 [2) 421-5333 Submitted into the public - record in connection with item on—14(-ov Walter Foeman 00 -1137 Cihf Clerk RCMP. Inc. 100.00% Related Companies L.P. OFFICERS: Stephen M. Ross, President Michael Brenner, Executive Vice President- - " Susan McGuire, Secretary.. Michael J. Wechsler, Treasurer _ The Related Companies L.P. _. 1.00%GP. ' The Related Realty Group, Inc. 64.7%Lid. Stephen M. Moss - 24.5%Ltd. Outside Investors (see attached list) 9.80%1,td. Jorge M. Perez - Total 100.00°fo Related Companies L.P. Outside Investors Stephen M. Ross Estate of Daniel Ginsberg Susan Snider Donald Ginsberg D:borah Williams Estate of Morris Ginsberg Jorge M. Perez Calmon Ginsberg Trust for Morris Ginsberg Estate for Calmon Ginsburg _. James Snider.1987'M Ins. Tr. Trust for Daniel Ginsberg Trust for Laurie Rudey Laurie Rudey Trust for Donald. Ginsberg Rona Jaffe Trust for Elsie Robinson Louis Weinberg , Andrew Augenblick Submitted into the public record in connection with item ,r �r� on Walter Foeman 0 -113'7 City Clerk . . CED/CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT Per City Code,-,Chsp#er:;36. Construction Equipment Request for waiver of noise ordinance while under construction. four continuous pours, Per City code, Chapter 23-5a, Request fpr a Certificate of Appropriateness . for ground disturbing, activity in an Archeological Conservation Area: MUSP, per Article 17 for development of 425"residential units: . MUSP, per Article 17 for a parldag structure:of 1834 parkiag_spaces..:._ MUSP, as per Article 17, . for . nonresidential uses involving an :excess of e626,?7: square feet floor area ratio. Special Exception, as Article 9, Section 917.1.2, to allow, valet parlang - for -restaurant up 50% of existing off-street parking spaces. Special Exception�as per Article 4, section 401, to allow bar/lounge open to the public within the.CBD District. Class 11 Special Permit as per -Article 15,`SectionI511, for any development between Biscayne Bay znd the first dedicated right-of-way. Class fh Special Permit =as per Article -A, Section 401; for temporary construction fence and covered walkway. Class II Special Permit as per Article 4, Section 40i, for development of new construction within the CBD Distreit. Class II Special Permit per Article .9, section 908.9, for development on Biscayne Boulevard. . Class II Special Permit as per Article 9, Section 908.2, for access from a,public, street roadway width greater. than 25 feet. Class 11 Special permit as per Article 15, Sectlon 151z, Waiver of Guides and Standards and guidelines, for 5 feet driveway from property lige. Class I Special Permit as per Article 9, Section 915.2, for FAA clearance letter, Submitted into the public record in connection with item ,�Z—� on /Yoe Walter Foeman o V4127 Clio Clerk V Elm • cla'sis-I-9pticial Permit as per Article 9, Section 906.6, for pool/outdoor recreation area. Class :I"5geccal Pt<z,xnit as _Artidi0 `#�; -Si Sectioa 917Z.1, Ito -.al ow valet parldrig for, -residenthil and Ober uses. I Special- Permit as per Article' 91 Section 925.3.87 to allow developmenticaumu a r Pe�w Class I Permit as -* per --Artfdi-9, - Secton918a, `for kg, and staging of comitradtioii"during: construction. , - Cln*ssV Permit as per Article,19, Sect,ionction 920.1l'- to.'. allow'- coristru,ction trafler.!, f shell kiquest for'.1he, folloyin time o g MUSP conditions: to. �bq, require%i .:Permit instead -of at issuance of foundationperad a. The requirementto'provide ,:i letter,of assurance fo;rthe Solid 'Waste :- Department; and b. The requirement to record in the Public Records'a Declaratioll of, - Covenants acid Restrictions providin., that the ownership, operation and maintenance of all common areas and facilities will be by the property owner or a mandatory property owner association; and d. The requiredient to record in the Public Recordsa, unity of title or covenant in lieu of unity of title. Designation as a phased development pursuant to Section 2502 of Ordinanc'e No. 11000. J�ye McPhee Zoning Inspector II Date Submitted. into the ipublic. , record in connection with item O�Z—_foa - V" ja-- _f-F - Walter Foeman 0:0-1137 �J • • J-98-1128 li/16/98 REC ! 84-09.P'G 3098 9aR6`?88�4- 199E- RESOLUTION N0. q 8 -1 1,b I A RESOLUTION, WITH ATTACHMENTS, APPROVING WITH CONDITIONS, A MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT, PURSUANT TO ARTICLES 13 AND 17' OF ZONING ORDINANCE NO.. 11000, FOR THE ONE MIAMI PROJECT, TO BE LOCATED AT THE PROPERTIES GENERALLY BOUNDED BY SOUTHEAST 2ND AVENUE ON THE WEST, BISCAYNE BOULEVARD WAY AND THE MIAMI RIVER ON THE SOUTH, BISCAYNE BAY ON THE EAST AND SOUTHEAST 2ND AND 3RD STREETS ON THE NORTH, MIAMI, FLORIDA; TO BE COMPRISED OF A PHASED PROJECT DEVELOPMENT, CONSISTING OF 300 HOTEL ROOMS, 1500 RESIDENTIAL UNITS, 400,000 SQUARE FEET OF RETAIL, 1,200,000 SQUARE FEET OF OFFICE AND 7000 PARKING SPACES WITH .ACCESSORY AMENITY SPACES AND RECREATIONAL USES; DIRECTING TRANSMITTAL OF THE HEREIN RESOLUTION; MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATING CONCLUSIONS OF LAW; PROVIDING FOR BINDING EFFECT; CONTAINING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, on September 11, 1998, Miami One Centre, Inc., ("APPLICANT"), submitted a complete Application for Major Use Special Permit for the One Miami Project (-"PROJECT") pursuant to Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, Articles 13 and 17,.for the property generally bounded'by Southeast 2nd Avenue on the west, Biscayne Boulevard Way and the Miami River on the south, Biscayne Bay on the east and Southeast 2nd and 3rd Streets ,oz�L the north, Miami, Florida, -as legally described on Exhibit "A" to be comprised of a 0- Submitted into the ublic P record in connection with item on aNA80- Walter Foeman City Clerk f ILI I CITY Cotacsssox MEETING OF. NOV 17 1998 �iuuoa xo. REc 18d;G9:ec 31 o0 for -ithe One �''Miam :-Project (hereinafter referred to as the "PROJECT,T to be developed by Miami One Centre, Inc. ( "APPLICANT".) , for the property!enerally 'bounded by Southeast 2na Avenue on the west,. Biscayne Boulevard Way and the 'Miami River °.oil • the -south,, Biscayne Bay on the east and Southeast 2nd and 3rd Streets on the north, Miami, Florida, as legally described on:Exhibi t "A", attached hereto and made a: part hereof.: Section` 3 . -`Thee PROJECT 'is-he-reby- : approved -for the, construction of ,up -to 300 hotel rooms; 1500-residential units; 400,`000 square feet of retail, 1, 200, 000 square- feet of office and 7000 parking --spaces with accessory` amenity spaces and recreational uses. Section 4.- The findings of fact set: --forth below are hereby made with respect to the subject PROJECT: a. The PROJECT is in conformity with the; adopted Miami -comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1969-2000, as amended. b. The PROJECT is in accord with the applicable CBD Zoning classification of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami; Florida, as amended. C. The total PROJECT is expected to cost approximately $1 billion, and to employ approximately 1,-540 workers during construction (FTE), and 160 annual recurring .jobs. The PROJECT will generate approximately $17.4 million annually in recurring .,Ad Valorem tax -revenues to local 'units of government S6MRec1dfQiR)l3ubQ9 this amount, approximately $5.7 qe n erct,7 �8v tkiCity l em 1 Walter Foeman O 0 _ 113'7 CIV Clerk f 9 [ 19EE 1'8409 ?C 3102 �fieigh'b0=00d development .program .proposed for the PROJECT will not adversely affect public safety; z. (;9) �ased� -on the"' record `presented and` `evidence presented; -the public "welfare will be served by °roposd_for° the PROJECT;programthe derelopmen aid (10) any potentially adverse effects of the PROJECT arising from safety- and security, fire protection and life - --safety, solid waste, heritage _ conservation, trees, minority participation and employment, and minority contractor/subcontractor participation will be mitigated through compliance with the conditions of- this 14ajor Use Special Permit. Section 5. The Major Use Special Permit, as approved and amended, shall be. binding upon the applicants, owners and any successors in interest. Section 6. The application for- Major Use Special Permit, which was submitted on September 11, 1998, as amended, and is on file with the Department of Planning and Development of the City of Miami, Florida, shall be relied upon generally for administrative interpretations and is made a part hereof by reference. Section 7.. This Major Use Special Permit will expire two (2) years from its effective date whiq'hu sittedltnV (3 ) days after record in connection with item on -14(-O Walter Foeman U O _ 113'7 ON Clerk RED' P _8409-13-103 the adopC -oh-of the -herein Resolution.-'! S - ec - tibn 6. The city, Manager is hereby directed to ins truc the. DiXectOrOf, -,the,.-ADep rtment.,._Of4_,P1.anning,, :and -` p Development ttransmit` a o' ansit' -a"copy of 'this' Resolution ion, and:: attachments to the developers: Miami one C . entre, Inc. , Blue LakeManagement, 5 0 0 0),'BluerLake; i--. # 15 O.t.. Boca -,Raton,,, FL... 3.3431. `and `Conclusions -of Law d: of: L:Fadt-, -Fin `Findings ion are made with respect to 'the Project as described in the Development -order -for. -the One Miami.._-1,Develo.pment Project,. which is attached heretoas Exhibit 11B 1! and made a part hereof by reference. -.Section 10. The, ,.Major ,. ,.-._,.Us_e_-, Spp.cia ---Permit Deve llopment Order for "the. One Miami Development Project (Exhibit "B"') is hereby granted and issued. Section 11. In ..the event that any portion or section. of this Resolution or the Development Order . (Exhibit "B") is determined to be invalid, illegal, or unconstitutional by a court or agency of competent. jurisdiction, such -decision shall in no manner 'affect the remaining portions of this Resolution or Development Order (Exhibit "B") which shall remain in full force and effect. Section,12. This' Resolution shall become effective thirty -Submitted into the public record inconnectionwith item on Z-2-1q-0 Walter Foeman 01tv clerk 00-1137, 4 s- FF 184�9 n 3104 (30) days after its"adop'tiol� �. i. r. ; , ,"�'�; , ; � �. PASSED AND AD.%PTED this 17th day of NOVemher_ 1998. „ : JOE CAROLLO ' .MAYGR-::_ .` In accordance with Miami Cads "Sze. 2-36. �:-�c? !tip �a-. n�, ,n•^'c-•e = this legislation by signing it in. the dasignaled oiacs becomes effective with the eiO3;: t; No (i0) days from tha data of Car'=as;c:i I regarding same, :without the: Mayor exercisin a eta; -: ATTEST: _ - - �• _ "F6a V man, City Cleric Vatt@�d WALTER J. FOEMAN CITY ;CLERK APPROVED. AS TO FORM: AND COR CTDTESS / A_ ,EJANDRO V I I:AA CI ATTORNEY 01 w3'041:GMM:csk:BSS S f 1� This Resolution shall become effective as specified herein unless vetoed by the Mayor within ten days from the date it was passed and adopted. If the Mayor vetoes this Resolution, it shall become effective immediately 'upon override ,of -the veto by the City Commission or upon the effective date stated herein, whichever is later. Submitted into the public, record in connection with item on Walter Foeman d 0 —113 7 Citv Clerkrj n .1 ",18409 PG 3105 _ 0 N I M I A M I Project 'Legai' Description Parcel A _ All of Tract D, Bl"ock 1, DlJ PONTPLAZA, according to the,plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 50, 'Page 11, of the`Pub(c Records of Dade County, Florida, LESS that portion :of .Tract ,D described as follows Begin at'the Northeast comer of said -Tract D and run West along the,North-line of Tracf'D"for a'distance' cf`645 -94 eet to a -Point of Curvature; thence Southwesterly.. along a-.circuiar curve to the left, -flaying a radius of 25.0 -feet, a central angle of 61 °26'00" for,an�arc,distance of,26.81-:feet to a Point -.of -Compound -Curvature; thence Southerly along:a circular curve to the left,-having.a radius of 300.00 feet, a central angle of 28°34'00" for an arc distance of 149.57 feet to a point of tangency; thence run South for a distance of 293.50 feet (said fast mentioned four courses being coincident _ with the boundary lines of said Tract D); thence run East for a distance of 179.41 feet; ` thence run North for, a distance of 150.00 feet; thence run East for a distancf 525.36 feet; thencee o run North. 00°04'07" West along the East line of said Tract D for a distance of 300.00 feet to the Point of Beginning, lying and being in Dade County, Florida. Parcel B All of Block 3, DU PONT PLAZA, -according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 50, Page 11, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. Parcel C. Lots 1 through 8, both inclusive, Block 2, DU PONT PLAZA, according to the peat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 50, Page 11, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. , Parcel D All of Block 4, DU PONT PLAZA, according to the.plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 50, Page 11, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. Exhibit A Submitted into the public record in connection with item on Walter Foeman 0 O _ 1 3'7 ON 01erk t: REE - 3z{ 06 ;;t = EXHIBIT "B" DEVELOPMENT ORDER t :A'ITACHI�IENT.:,TO; RESOLUTION NO. DATE: r bNE' MIAMI' 'PROJE�CT MAJOR 't1SE:-,SPECIAL• .PERMIT DEVELOPMENT ORDER Let,it be known ..:that-;. pursuant-, to Articles ; . 13 : _..and:: 17 of Ordinance . No 110 0 0, the Zoning _ Ordinance- of '"'the City' of ---:Miami, Florida, as amended", the Commission of the City of Miami, Florida, has considered in a,public hearing -the. issuance, of a Major Use Special Permit to be comprised of a Phased Development to consist -of mixed uses for`the One Miami .Project (hereinafter referred to. as the 'PROJECT") t.o_ be .located at the properties generally bounded by -Southeast °2nd Avenue on '.the we Biscayne Boulevard Way.and the Miami River on the south, Biscayne Bay on the east .and Southeast 2nd and 3rd Streets on .the north, Miami, Florida; see legal ..description in Exhibit "A", -attached hereto and made a part hereof; said legal description is subject to any dedications, limitations,. restrictions, -reservations or easements of record. After due consideration of the recommendations of the Planning Advisory Board .and after due consideration of- the consistency of this proposed development with the Miami--- Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan, :the City Commission .,has approved ,the - PROJECT, and subj.ect.to the 'following condit' ns p rove th Major .Use UDmlB� into to pueblic record in connection with item on .i.2=/y�oa Walter Foeman n 0 ' 3 . Citx, Clerk f C 18�09� 31D1 ;,Svecial "'Permit -and- hereby' issues, this Perrin 't PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The proposed One Miami Project is a Phased Mixed Use Project which will -occupy the properties generally bounded by Southeast 2nd Avenue on the west,. Biscayne Boulevard Way and the Miami River on the -south, Biscayne . Bay on ' the :;east,-- and Southeast 2nd and 3ra Streets..`on the. north, Miami',: Florida; see legal, description in Exhibi t "A" ( "PROJECT") The "PROJECT is' located on. approximately. 14.19 gross. 'acres ".and 8.98 net acres of land M (more specifically described in Exhibit "A", incorporated herein by ref erence) . The remainder of the. PROJE= s VITAL DATA is attached hereto as ;Exhibit "C",; and. incorporated herein by . reference. The proposed PROJECT is, hereby approved for the construction of up to,300` hotel rooms, 1,500 residential.units, 400,.000 square feet of retail, :1 2..00,000 square' feet of office and 7,000 parking.. -spaces with''.accessory ..amenity, spaces and recreational uses. The Project' shall not be constructed until' such time that each individual phase undergoes approval as a substantial modification of this permit; said s all equine all mtd� i e pubrl customary. -reviews required for ` a '�ffili—pon ctig{� i permit item r,2- Walter Foeman v o —1 3rJ Cite Clerk • • _ Submitted into the public E� l 8409 P� 3108 record in connection with item 2-� on 2 c Walter Foeman including the Large Scale Development Committee and the vbCa` Development.Review Board. The mix and scale of uses proposed for the PROJECT conform to the requirements of the CBD Zoning District, as contained in Ordinance No. 11000,* the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended. The existing comprehensive plan future land use designation allows the proposed mix and intensity of uses. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCEOFA BUILDING PERMIT THE APPLICANT, ITS SUCCESSORS, AND/OR ASSIGNS, JOINTLY OR SEVERALLY, SHALL COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING FOR EACH PHASE OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM APPROVED HEREIN: 1. Meet all applicable building codes, land development regulations, ordinances and other laws. 2. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, provide the City with a list of agencies from which'approvals and/or permits must be obtained prior to initiation of'development and the permit or approval required of each. j 3. Prior `to the issuance of a building permit, record a certified copy of the development order in the Public Records of Miami -Dade County that .specifies that the Development Order .runs with the land and is binding on the B-3 Applicant, severally. _ •obmitted into the public REC l 84-09 PG 3 f 99 itom rd nonection with 2 � Walter Foernan its successors, and assigns, joiptipPerkor 4. Allow the Miami Police Department to conduct a security survey at the option of the Department, so as to make recommendations concerning security measures and systems; further submit a report to the Department of Planning and Development, prior to commencement of construction, demonstrating how the Police Department. recommendations, if any, have been incorporated into the PROJECT security and construction plans, or demonstrate to the Planning Director why such recommendations are impractical. 5. Provide a letter from the Department of Fire -Rescue _. indicating APPLICANT'S coordination with members of the Fire Plans Review Section of the Department of Fire -Rescue for. the review of the scope of the PROJECT, owner responsibility, building development process and review procedures, as well as specific requirements for fire protection and life safety systems, egress, vehicular access and water supply. 6. Provide a letter of assurance from the Solid Waste Department that the PROJECT has addressed all concerns of said Department. 7. Prepare a Minority Participation and Employment Plan to be submitted to the City's Director of Minority and Women Business Affairs for review and domments, with the understanding that the City's Minority/Women Business Affairs and. Procurement Ordinance No. 10536 ig a guide that the APPLICANT must use its best efforts to follow, 8. Prepare a Minority Contractor/Subcontractor Participation Plan to the City's Director of Minority and Women Business Affairs for review and comment, with the understanding that 0 ®r 4 1 3 7 B-4 - RI.0 .1 84�9 PC O the City's. Minority/Women Business Affairs and Procurement Ordinance No. 10538 is a guide that the APPLICANT must use its. best cefforts to fo141ow. 9. Record --:in the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida, a ,Declaration of Covenants: and Restrictions providing that the ownership, . operation= 'and°. ita ntenance of all common areas and facilities will be by the property owner or a mandatory property owner association in perpetuity. 10. Provide the City with an executed, recordable unity of title or covenant in -lieu of unity of title agreement for the subject property; said agreement shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Attorney's Office. 11. The applicant shall provide plans for proposed sidewalk and .`:. swale area improvements prior to the issuance of a building permit; said plans shall be subject to review and approval by the Public Works Department and the Department of Planning and Development. 12. Provide the Department of Planning and Development with a temporary parking plan which addresses construction employee parking during the construction period; said plan shall be subject to the review and approval by the Department of Planning and Development prior to the issuance- of any building permits. 13. The applicant shall retain the services of an archeological consultant who will be responsible for conducting archeological monitoring of all ground, disturping activity, as well as the subsequent recovery of artifacts; said 10 consultant shall obtain a scope of work from the Miami -Dade County Archeologist and shall provide reports to both .that Submitted into the public record In connection with • item on a--/K-oa Walter Foeman p p—11.3'7 0 ® r° SEE ! 8409 P3 I l Office and the City of Miami Preservation Officer. 14. Apply for a substantial modification review and approval for each of the phases proposed within this Major Use Special Permit each phase shall .require approval of the design :component including right-of-way improvements, facade treatment, signage, lighting, etc.; no phase .".bf,.,',the project shall -be`' 'constructed until such time that ` said approvals are obtained; said approvals shall require all customary reviews required for a Major Use Special Permit, including the Planning;;Advisory Board, Large -Scale Development Committee and -the Urban; Development Review .Board.. - THE CITY SHALL: Subject to payment .of all applicable fees due, establish the effective date of this Permit as being thirty (30) days from the date of its issuance; the issuance date shall constitute the commencement of the thirty (30) day period to appeal from the provisions of the Permit. The development program proposed for the, One Miami Project by the applicant, Miami One Centre, Inc., ("Appplicant"), complies with the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1969-2000, is consistent wLth the orderly development and goals of the City of Miami, and complies with local land development regulations, and it is further found, pursuant to SectiktjTIgSd j�toZ gAg . dinance record in connection with item on Waiter Foeman 0 0 -113'7 City Clerk L1_G Rc' 18409 PG 3112 No..11000 that: (1) the development (program proposed .lf;or.::-:the PROJECT wilhave a _favorable impact on the economy of the (2) the development program_.;proposedr for- the PROJECT:_ will efficiently mouse a public transportation -. '.faci1it::e5,: and _ 4 (3) the ;.:development :program proposed for' -the PROJECT will .favorably affect" the need for people to find adequate housing, office .,.,.space and hotel ' and retail_ uses_. awithin the downtown -area; and' - :.-the development ro ram P ; g prop`osed_- f.or the:_.PROJECT _- ,wi=1T -efficiently use n1. ecessary public facilities; - _- . __ and - ..-__. (5)- the development _program `proposed -for__ -the PROJECT:- will not - -n- e ativel i g y mpact `the environment and ' -`- Will, natural resources of - ;the: _Cit Y.; and (6) - the PROJECT, wi1,1 not. _ adversel- ' affect Y public: ` safety, and _ (7) the development -program proposed for the public welfare will be served -by the PROJECT; - and ^ potentially adverse effects of --the PROJECT will be mitigated through the _conditions of this Major Use Special Permit. The proposed .:development program does not unreasonably interfere with the achievement of the objectives of -the adopted State Land Development Plan applicable to t-ne City of Miami. Pursuant to Section 1305 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, the specific site plan aspects of the PROJECT i..e_., ingress and egress, offstreet parking and loadir rfflfI;&LqI%0affiq Rice areas, signs and lightin re ord, ink nne t wintrol of g, utilities ite a on v-- . Walter Foeman ®O —1 3'7 R _ 7 Citu Clerk 10 Submitted into the public ..'record in connection with item on — /v, oa Walter Foeman p _ 4 City Clerk. Lot Area: Gross Lot Area: - Net Lot Area; CAI 14.19 acres_ (618,116.4 sq. ft:) 8.98 acres (391 168.8 sq. ft,) �• Density:: Units Per Acre Permitted; 1000 units/acre. Units Per Acre Provided: Parcel A 300 dwelling units; and 300 hotel rooms(equiv. 150 dwelling units)/3.04 net acres = 148 units per acre. t Parcel B-1,200 dwelling units/2.46 net acres 488 units per. acre.: Parcels A .& B - 1,500/ dwelling units` and 300 hotel rooms (equiv. 150.'dwelling units)15.5 net acres = 300 units per acre. Submitted into the public record in connection with item on Walter Foeman Cite Clerk 00-113'7 REC I8409-3115 0NI'M1AM1_ - PROJECT DATA SHEET (Cont,) 6.` '` Floolr`-0.rea Ratio . 'Permitted: Unlimited. 7 ,Laading.Berths: To be provided at .time of the .substantial - :.modification to the.'MUSP. r B Height Permitted aJnlirnited ,.- .; 9 ; :Suilding'Footprint: To be provided at .time . of the substantial = modification to the MUSP. 10.: Parking Spaces:, _;_ 300 Room Hotel. No minimuml450 spaces maximum/225 . provided . _ Conference Center" 100,000 sq. ' No minimum/1000 spaces maximum/100 provided.,. 300.Condominium units. No minimum J 600 spaces maximum] 600 provided.:... 1,200 Apartment units. No minimum 12400 spaces maximum 11500 provided. . 1,200,000 sq.•ft. of Office -1200 minimum / 2000 maximum / 2000 provided. 400,000:sq. ft. of Retail.. No minimum ! 1333 maximum 1900 provided. Commercial Parking i No minimum l no maximum / 1,675 provided: . Handicapped spaces:,- The percentage of Handicap spaces provided will .be as defined by the Florida Accessibility Code. ; Submitted into the -.public record in connection with ' Z�� item . on-/V--oo _ Walter Foeman 0 0 —1 37 -.:. ON Clerk - - RECJ_;� 8409'pc3 I I,r l F Ft.. STATE OF FLORIDA ) - COUNTY .F DADE o-DAoEco,,,_, r.': Er , RECOQD VT,7,F1: D CITY OF, MIAMI. NaRvE1' RUVIN I;: WALTER J. FOEMAN,I-City:Clerk. of the .City of Miami, Florida, and keeper of the records thereof, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing page numbered i through 19, inclusive, 'constitute °a' true and. correct copy of a Resolution with attachmentsTassed- and ; 'adopted by the City Commission at the meeting held on the -1 day of No`venzber, 1998. SAID RESOLUTION WAS DESIGNATED AS RESOL UTION NO. 98-1151. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hereunto set my hand and impress the official seal of the City of Miami, Florida this 18"' day of December, 1998. WALTER J. FOEMAN City Clerk Miami, Florida By '1'Y 0 "' Deputy Clerk (0 FICIAI� E'AL)i s. ' C Ci4 PORA Co 's�G �', ;• Submitted into the public record in connection with item -�S on —14(, oa Walter Foeman Citv Clerk 00-113'7 I _ m-14 1. JUN lip till 10 we M r +- '� � jai+• �.'1� i��'�.,� �,�i�♦�:.a.:i'Yi,y ' �. rdl�4i ce bit. r -_ w 4 � ,gyp_ 1. ill •c � •f-'S+?, �{ l •' .. AlIla SU 1 Mi.' ,♦ ------------ ►ra. '.�"' `' T .'r �. ♦��ri ram`:� .�: ,�: � ee ..V•c, . ,,:'. — .. r� �• tic { •.,+-N �? J j �. PROJECT DATA I- SITE. LOCATION: 205 SOUTH BISCAYNE BOULEVARD, MIAMI FLORIDA NET LOT AREA:;3.04 ACRES, GROSS LOT;AREA-4.9:ACRES •..; . F ZONING: CBD-CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT COMMERCIAL.: FLOOR AREA -RATIO .-UNUMIT I)" MAXIMUM NUMBER QF APARTMENTS 100UNITS J500/ACRE) II- SETBACKS (CITY -OF MIAMI), ` REQUIRED_ ---."PROPOSED FRONT _ m.5,.0. S .p+ REAR SIDE :0 0- 0'-D BUILDING HEIGHT UNLIMITED -- - - . 476'-3'.. '.... CHARTER PROVISION _':--50%0' 20'-0' to 36'-B" III- OPEN SPACE CRITERIA: F.A.R. — (50,000)/ 50 = (532,421 + 623,348) — 50,000/ 50 = 1,105,769150 TOTAL = 22,1115 S.F. REQUIRED PROPOSED . 22,115 S.F. 69,069 S.F. IV- RESIDENTIAL TOWER GROSS AREA :626,552 S.F. F.A.R. AREA :532,421 S.F. NUMBER OF UNIT$- :425 UNITS NUMBER OF FLOORS :49 HEIGHT AT ROOF :467'-0' N.G.V.D. PARAPET HEIGHT :518'-0" N.G.V.D. V- OFFICE TOWER GROSS AREA :707,025 S.F. • . F.A.R. AREA :623,348 S.F NUMBER OF FLOORS;. :34 HEIGHT AT ROOF :476'-3" N.G.V.D. PARAPET HEIGHT :513'-7" N.G.V.D. TYP.GROSS FLR. AREA :22,610 S.F. VI- PARKING GARAGE NUMBER OF FLOORS :12 OFFICE: ANCILLIARY USE: CRITERIA:IPKG.1500 S.F. OF RENTABLE No. OF PKGS.: 800,541 S.F./ 500 S.F. =1,201 PKG. SPACES ANCILLIARY USE: CRITERIA : 1 PKG/1,000 S.F. No. OF PKG.:2,972 S.F./1,000 S.F. = 3 PKG. SPACES TOTAL PKG SPACES =1,204 Submittedinto the public record_ in connection with item on—IY--oa Walter Foeman _ i 3 Ir1 City Clerk RESIDENTIAL 'ANCILLIARY USE: CRITERIA: No. UNITS @1.3 + 10% VISITORS No. UNITS 425@1.3 = 553 + 10% VISITORS = 596 SPACES ANCILLARY USE:CRITERIA:1 PKG11,000 S.F. No. OF PKG.:2,909 S.F./1;000 S.F. = 3 PKG. SPACES TOTAL PKG SPACES • - = 599 TOTAL PROVIDED :1,834 SPACES. OFF-STREET LOADING: - REQUIRED : PROVIDED.:. (4) BERTH 12'z35' -- (4) BERTH 12'x 35' '(2) BER-'H:12'x"55' - -_ '- :.: _ (2) BERTH 12'x 55' RESIDENTIAL: AREA 1F.A.R. LEVEL' AREA - No. OF°FLOORS SUB -TOTAL GROUND ;. 4,377 _. _ 1- : 4,377 MEZZ LEVEL 3 8,606 1 8,606 4 ,5 & 6 11,447 3_-- _-..:._ .: : 34,341. 7,8,9,10,11,12 &13 12,376 7 .. _; 86,632 POOL 12,376 1. ,- .. _ . 12,376 15,16,17,18,19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26 27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38, _ 39,40,41 & 42 12,243 28 342,804 43,44 &45 10,275 3_. ___....... ._. _.- _,._. 30,825 46,47 & 48 3,115 3 9,345 -49 .3,115 1 3,115 TOTAL No. FLOORS = 49 TOTAL 532,421 S.F. OFFICE: AREA IF.A.R. LEVEL AREA No. OF FLOORS SUB -TOTAL GROUND 9,429 1 9,429 MEZZ - B2 3,992 1 3,992 MEZZ - B3 71428 1 7,428 MEZZ - B4 11,562 1 11,562 5, 6 , 7 14,113 3 42,339 8,9,10 19,479 3 58,434 11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22 20,162 12 242,028 23,24,25,26,27,28,29'.30,31,32,33,34 20,678 12. j 248,136. TOTAL No. FLOORS = 34 TOTAL 623,348 S.F. Submitted into . the public record in connection with item -L on �t Walter Foeman 00 _ 1 Jt 37 Cihf Clerk 07/,21/200.0 * * PUBLIC :VALUE ",`INQUIRY * * * PTXMOlE 10 O1 0114 030 1041 PROP ADDR.. MCD 0101 ' NAME,AND LEGAL VALUE HISTORY 1.. Al ONE CENTRE LTD PARTNERSHIP YEAR 1998 1999 05/02/2000 301 YAMATO RD #3101- LAND. 8362789' 9838575 BOCA RATON FL BLDG, -MARKET8362789 9838575 33431 ;,ASSESS,- , 83627.89 t 9838575 DUPONT:-PL. AZA"iPB5:0 11 _ :;HEX,;. TR D' $LrK''=1 LESS BEG NE COR OF WVD TR:D TH .W64.5.94FT ;SWLY,:.ALG A/D .TOT,. EX . ,. 26. 81FT :SLY14.9 -.57FT, S293 ..5,0FT: TAXABLE- 836278'9 ..:9838575 ' E179.41FT N150FT.-E525 3.6FT =- N300FT TO POE STATE EXEMPT_: = _ LOT Si.ZE.13.1181 SQ FT - - OR 18341-2334 11.98 5 (4) SALE DATE-03/�19-80 SALE ,AMT 3434000 SALE';TYPE .6 _ : I/V,_ V :, SALE_OM.. 10703-51E PF1-MORE LEGAL PF2-PARCEL" INFO- PF3-FOL SRCH PF57TAX.COLL PF7-PREY OWNER PF8-MEi PF13-OCCUP LIC DC999999 FOLIO IS -IN CANCELLED STATUS FOR.THE 2000 TAX ROLL Submitted into the public record In connection with itemr� on /Yoe. Walter Foeman Co " 1 i 3 "7 ite Clerk 01 1 r ) .� I°p.6 NOY l e P1i 9� �5 a Z► 0 9 2 0 • SPECU►LWAR}ZA*fiYDEED �EC I8341-raZ334• TF05 1NDEPfI'URF, tttsde tsis'L day6rkL",-. t99? by hCAI% I CENTER lbiNT VENT- bM a Florida general pari=mbip having an address at cio World Financial Pr�pertiei i P • One Liberty Plaza, New York, New York 10006 ('Grantor"), in ravor of ': mlaal Dne t:cntre Malted Partaershlp a Piorlds hatted psrtnrrmhlp , haviag art addms at 301 .Yaaato P:oA Iltol:..-,Rnea Viacom, FLarlds 3343. ("Grantee'): - WifNESSETH, tt at Graalor, for and in consideration of the sum of Test Dolltn iI10 dt))'in land pl<d and other good and valuable crosidertdoa. the receipt and su54ency of which are hereby acknowledged, try these presenu does GRANT, SELL and CONVEY unto Grantee, its succatora and assigns the following described real property: Atolg.that cc% n tram of land locs:cd is Dade County, Florida and being more panicz:tally dcsrn'bed on Schedule A art""lie+ hereto and trade to par hereof, togCher with all improvemer-ts, built nEx or factures situated ar ]ocued thereoct, and all apptlrtenant.rights. privileges or erscelr u belonging or is e•ay way rdati: g thereto, including but not limited to. all interest, if any, of GrL=r in any lead lying in or under the bed of any highway, avenue, scree:. road• alley. eaaemtat or tif{itt-cf-wdy, open orproposed, in, on, across, abutting oT adjacent to the property des,-ribcd on Sc.s' edule A hereto• togmher with all of Gr ntoes right. title and iwzmsi to any stripa'snd gores ,vith m or bduadag the property (all of said property and irucrcn being collectively referred to hceia v3 the 'Property'). TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the Propertyy, together with any and a!l die -rights and appurtenances therds in anywi-w beloogiag to Grantor, unto Chmantee, its.suc:cssciri and assigns FOREVER Greater, for iudf and its successors, Foes covenant, prorni:e aidWee, to and with Grant= that Crmmar has not done o: suffered to be done, anything whereby the Property hereby granted is, or stay be, in any raanne:r mcatabcrd or charged, subject, however,.to all easements, covmmnts, resnictioas and reservtticna of record, if.any. Grantor does hereby w ;nutt and agree to defend title to the Property against the lawful claims of all persons cwrtjng by, through or under. Gra.•aor. trlt not otherwise• subject to all casements, covenants, agTtements, restrictio:ts and mwv=on3 of r=md, if any. I Th tl.^st-ttrr�tt is exeolted and delivered pursuant to an Order Confirming m Aended Plaa of Reorpmiatioa of Miami Comer Join: Ve•neue pursuant to Chapter 1 1 of the United Stu_fBaaktuptcy Coda (the *Order`)dsted Septersber IE. 1997 of the United Sates S arkrurtry Court, 5authe::st District of l4cw York (the 'Bankruptcy Court"). rstd r-ntrred on - September 19, 1997 an the docket in the: ease ofLn re Nfluni Center Joint Venture. Debtor Dccumarrtary Vamp: Czlict:u S tJf_)1. S�— SURTAX D r- S:or..p: C-.:�xlad e•artsM KlY_ Uamnfaet. OCL33'•C'1 IntanCihh To,c 6A.Ve - Ic:t.r ' _ t•cgrJ•J4]�_�.• Ictl•, tJu.'•: Lrlvn!/, fIL•. 11 lr•3'`�k;!l?`;=ijt::aa•�-,r.yrf.�:2ir •r.c,K..��." • . . . ,—'.►::. •• ,-.;. is r,.. (�% _'*v. ;y;:•,��,.�.•r�.•ItY`�••. 1•:�,'. '. 1..—•1` .. . . . . 4 ,• I t1�1�11,iir Ov!Tw. 1, l". )•v.'a •�..i • r.. rs :, • • .t • J....v: _ _ . .. _4 ' .' .. : • ',' ..l4 .; . •' 'i l'.l�:.fvcr•\.Ki.�ti�i►iiir%w�• w�.1:-.�, .\ . t• .0 1.11 D `M •, `. ,•,. 1.. _,::,, :; rrti##e�l' i ttleiub{iC., l•1.:1... = . -- - •-1--- • -i�--eet?�fi0n'�tl%t.Fi' 4. •" it i•111 i •. •k7:ii ill hi�.ti::.�:?t....:.r«-:..�:.^��A1'�`r•]:V�_:J,•-�r� ��,cci•��f1Ys,��� ..� ';A.:%4=�.-•1C rat, •.�%1•Kr•1 r.•.�"-T ` T / .,' . ales demari'' ' Q•O—'1137... CIN Clerk • - �� 13341 «Z335 •� (CisWa 11 Case No. % S 44392 (7LG)), which Order provides for the UVwrt r of the mid .- ptamitsa put�+aat to Lh6 imstrl"MMI : IN WiII SS WI-E EOF. Grse:ar Lu caused ics name to be sipcd to these prCS' u the d•cy"yca 6m above wrium W tensed :. ; %?AIA?a CETSR TOIIYT VENTURE -By: WPP Florida Equiry:Ceip.,BY: C71 BY. _ Title: Cz46v1%,.4. VILA- Tax Parcd LD. No&- 010114 030 1041 _. . 010114 030 1050 010114 030 1270 ..01 0114 030 1130 After recording, this doc == should be re.-trzed to: - �c f _y tt�orrtstv►t xr_+uemrrs�a� Itvlrrr t T:•.C�cr.0a� �+ ••• *� ��-.�t,��,:�.�.. _:•• ,:.'�.i.: �..� «. ~ •�'�� ��' �� -.~•'� "err: `.!1..t�."d ' • � 1�{•?�1v��,_+r2��ji:::irrs��t.=:r.-.:.�.':^�•� � �:i::=t :i-:. �Z�...-ai:. •... : q;` .. �. ,; �:li i•^ V'/Ll,:r}..(; 'wt=.`Y�... % Y�+:-a .•:.. � I r.y- p: 1: • �v :,..:.r•. •, �' 4 " ;i .1; «�•. `•r::J f ti'�1 •R . �••� { 1. . .,4„;1•p�,j 17:5�'!-:..'.'�:' :tip .'. n,. :,. •... .�����.• . �lti�.•�''., :L' ��L H■ _ / : �•i'f( 1�3.!.�'.!..fir•,�n�s:kRl�•'yira,'�•�^���f�:^Yfd��..., ■n 3j Y Gi '�';: 1 \.fir' ^ �tlF ' I ; .��.' `�ri:.�f.•ii� .w }L 1ri�.".i,: sl�'.�..�.�h`� ,1;:�`•;. ti z• S: �•.r' t• A. f'�t.�:���. G'ti%;;�lM-�•1'��r?�.t�1:4�:;�:�Yr"��''R�4•.L�''�•!�il•�;::{�i�Ly ��k�•T ;� �'y4�r i � l9J:�1 •". .,r- V :_-+•cam :. _ .+; �..J.: •..i•=Y ��:� �.•ti"_ v,• ::••y • '� • f i y '��i r::�.„l'N: 1.-:rF/. f:/ :L' L'� fyY. •. 1�••If:•, . � :I �t5���iYiwt•::-_7{:+•�aef•..s���Y•C}:r.Ci.:�e::w•.�...�Or;_:•...r•+.�—...t.��. :a.-rzrX� . •tom •ta .Tar+"�t�:�C'��t1%':s+`�lJ:7G�+.�':•'V�7V���',�1q�}� �♦f:r� .�..�.r= �., �. �,.� • ,' • 1 gg.�, , �}•igT;�.rY.Yt..7.�+!?•}^7�. }YN��},�5���•'•pr�Ja�Ap�r�S.1�►i�'("�N�p..~}��,,,.,.•���.}�[�I.�..�.�..f 'I•�,�'�r1 . , �1t(I.�ii� Mtn n�/i''T��Li{F��a:.�� ...,, ."iY ;*•+a Kik.:++gE�J'P117,��.,•yMtil' {8:.arG•{: � `:� �:� �' m on Walter Foe/�ma�nl 0 ®_ 113 7 v rz. all STATE OF COUNTY OF . .... ... y a .1 the 09 tothe -k=no bcihii.bym-e'dLdy.ti&i6ii�"7-4id'�depose Lmd Say he resides at L, • thu he is the F —of WFP Florida Equity Corp.. the corpomdoll wfsicit Is &stribed in- d %0iich ck=t*d the which corporation is lbe general pLiner of N%41�a CENTER 0 foreyving instrument. I rNT VENTURE, the partnership which ==tcd the forepimS iaslr== that the CX=tion of the Lacurumd= by WFP Florida Mquity Corp. wu duly authorized zctmft to the pu-mei Wp sgreemmt of said p&mAc rs;Up*. that the gc=&j puucr executed the in%-zum== on behalf ofth- partnership pursuant to said -Luthodistion-vid L%st he knows the seal ofsaid corporation; that . -Lhc-&esJ -Fsx.-d m acid ir-nnuncu is gt--ch corporate seal; that. irwas so zTIxed by a; also orthe, board ofdir=oncfuld=rp-ori4on.-andtluth�iigredEsrL--ethffetobyUe-lu&.o V 14 Nct;uyPublic, SUL, So" cd "do" Vaft NameprL-deJ: My Camuvzissiar. Expires! o Cor=iss:OnNo.: [NOTARIAL SEAL] 3momY4 -ei IVIPP7 Walter Foeman City 015irk 00-1137 j CEr SC nLjLqA p, t LEQALmc N Lees I thru 11-Vock 2,.LAts I thru 14alock 3, Lots I dxu S Block 4 and Tr - _,-, 1 D Block I ii�� recorded -in -Plat Bbok . �::.-P aza.7, So, RrpA8CII,ce 'C'rDXdC COUMY. Florida, LESS tbJ.' PCr',iCd ofsaid Tract D des=ibcd comer of said. -Tract". °D sad V tLN6IrthaCQfT=tIDfor 645.94 feat to zPoint ot Curvature; tbg= ScuthwesteliY along a ciroll&r Cava to the left having a radius -cf25.00;f=rind &,ccuzI- n- ta-�I:elia, to M. KM :disu=c-cf 26-Men to a Point of Compotod Curvaure: theacc Soutb=iy along a drcular cLuvc to the left having jL, radio of 300-00 feet and a cc=xl angle of 28 dew 34 caitattes 00 eeeonds for an arc attace of 149.57 C=t to gL Point -or 'r=&=cY, thCdC4 South far 293-50 feet (said Im =. floned four =uM=-bcEaS r-oinddc= with the boundary t:r= of said Tract D)., thence east for -1,79 4 &&t;_' �EhCMCC NOriii-flir-'M0-00-66i; ihmacd East fo.-525.36 feet thence North OO-d—c C-1 KARVEY RUVIK Walter 'Fio'eman 01tv Clerk 0'0 1137 CONSUELO M. QUINTANA REAL ESTATE DATA RESEARCHER 1111 SW 11th Avenue, Miami, FL 33129.-1820 _ _OFQ�4 305-858-2287 FAX A-30'5'859-2439 K. AUGUST 24, 20001` CITY OF MIAMI PLANNING.& ZONING.BOARD ADMINISTRATION;DEPAR:TMENT ; P.O. BOX 330708- - - _. MIAMI, FL 33133. RE: PROPERTY OWNERSHIP LIST 375' FT FROM: (SEE MAP ATTACHED) . MIAMI, FL 33131 (STREET ADDRESS) (SEE MAP & LEGAL DESCRIPTION ATTACHED) (LEGAL DESCRIPTION) DADE COUNTY FLORIDA. THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE ATTACHED OWNERSHIP LIST, MAP AND MAILING MATRIX IS A COMPLETE AND ACCURATE REPRESENTATION OF THE REAL ESTATE PROPERTY AND PROPERTY OWNERS 375' FT FROM THE SUBJECT PROPERTY LISTED ABOVE. THIS REFLECTS THE MOST CURRENT RECORDS ON FILE IN THE DADE COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S OFFICE. SINCERELY, C NSUELO M. QUINTANA ' 10 (MIA-2214) (L-694) (INV-2331) (9 LABELS) Submitted into the pub is record in connection wi item on —/y--oc Walter Foeman Cite Clerk d 00-1137 A 75 LEGAL 'D_ ( -ED E .);:,c IN PLA5 C).:)K 5 j FZTI'6'Wt4 OF TRACT C DEc_CP.!=_E0 AS AL_ 0. TRAC 1 0, BLOr"' I - E;U;C pxnr 1, OF THF P . :E:.' CZECOPZ'S F'; _AL ..-A'T. THE *4 U EAV -0-' I.JOF.T:, L-NE OF TRACT D�-FOR A M-TAN2-E 5Et:N F7 CURVITUPE, A C1r-C',.j*LAR 1011�4E LE ��F S 4 C-IJTW-'/E5, ERLY r- 'Ail ARC D 7'XNCE OF 26.31 `.FEET TO A ..Div FEET. PC P CIJRVE TC T:4 E L-9*F... mA.VINr, A RADIUS F A ' dr, 3 0 -3 E CE OF 149.57 FEET P31w, §ES "BEkC, FCR A, _-"'5TA?.C_ ;':7FE k_Mj LLAI,T. 'IN 7HEK-CE EZ7 FOP -F-- C 0 C - - v1ITH 7H- CN, b 1 '79.41 --r-t.'THEN' E'N NORTH FOR T�ENCEt*PTK� 0904"^,72! WES. � Ali' N-Z; THE Ca 7 E, *,3='5 FOR 150.00'FE IIN .1 ING i 13- P.3- LINE "�FSAO, TRAC-1 0 C F, .3 0 3. Y_, THE POINT C�F E;_7GtI4-- G, LY Ai D BEING `11 THE CITY '0,- MIAMI. DAVE J" Submitted into the public record in connection with " on 5' item Walter Foeman ON Clerk 00 _11:37 (L-594L) l= LAtItLS VVi I nvu I A 1%do•11 t••• ••1 375FT CE C MATHE 'ON . = SUNSET..DR Mw FL 33143 1 jl viO Z fi: CITY OF MIA DEPT OF P & D OF DIV ASSET MGT _ e CITY 1,4 SW 2ND AVE #325 - MA FL 33130 MIAMI CENTER JOINT VENTURE °°lo WORLD FIN PROP `i65 BROADWAY 6 FLR ` ;::NEW YORK NY,1D006 INTER CONTINENTAL FLA.LTD _ 3RD FLR ACCTG 100 CHOPIN PLAZA CRESCENT MIAMI CENTER LLC 777 MAIN ST #2100 FORT WORTH TX 76102 MIAMI ONE CENTRE LTD PTRS 301 YAMATO RD #3101 BOCA RATON FL 33431 S R I MIAMI VENTURE LP % SHORENSTEIN CO LP 200 S BISC BLVD #1670 MIA FL 33131 SWIRE PACIFIC HOLD{NGS INC %SWIRE BRICKELL ONE INC 501 BRICKELL KEY DR # 600 EMI FL 33131- Submitted ' into the public record in connection with item 07-2`5 on--lY-oo Walter Foeman. Cih, Clerk 00. 113'7 • DUPONT PLAZA PB 50-11 BLOCK 1 (L-694) (11 LABELS) 375FT TRACTS.A-BA'C-BLK t.LESS ESMT P.ORTION:'LEAGED TO 6RUCE C MATHESON' CITY OF MIAMI & LESS BEG 24.99FTE OF X OF SE 2AVE 4940 SUNSET DR & SE 4 ST TH S23.99FT E6.08FT N40.34FT SWLY SELY MIA FL33143 AID 17.B1FT TO POB & LESS BEG 114.07FTS & 1.08FTE OF X OF SE 2 AVE & SE 4 ST TH E2.50FT S 2.50FT W2.50FT,N2 50FT_TO"POB & LESS BEG 144.07FTS 8 9.08FTE OF X,OF-SE-2 AVEr& SE-4-SYTH E2.50FT S2.50FT W2.50FT N2.50FT TO POB ,300 RISC BLVD WAY - 01-01143-001-010 PORT OF TRACT A LEASED.F.OR WALK<WAY.ALG SE 2ND-AVE --CITY OF:MIA DEPT OF P D 401 SE 2ND AVE .& CITY OF DIV ASSET 01-01143-001-011 - 444 SW 2ND AVE4325 MIA FL 33130 v, 01-01143.001-041 , TRACT D LESS BEG NE COR OF.TR D TH-W645.94FT SWLY ALG:A/D :MIAMI CENTER JOINT VENTURE 25.B1FT SLY149.57FT S293.50FT E179.41Ff N150FT % WORLD FIN PROP E525.36FT N30017T TO POB 165 BROADWAY 6FLR 201 S BISC BLVD NEW YORK NY 10006 01-3136-079'/0001 PORT OF TR D BLK 1 DESC BEG NE COR OF TR 0"TH -. ._ INTER CONTINENTAL FLA LTD W545.94FT SWLY ALG AD 26.81FT SLY149.57F7J- "- 3RD FLR ACCTG S293.50FT El79.41FT N150FT E525.36FT N30OFT : " -, .100 CHOPIN PLAZA` TO POS LESS LIFT STATION AKA MIACTR CONDO MIA FL 33131 100 CHOPIN PLAZA UNDIV .50% INT IN COMMON ELEMENTS INTER CONTINENTAL FLA LTD MIAMI CENTER CONDOMINIUM 3RD FLR ACCTG 260 BISC BLVD WAY 100 CHOPIN PLAZA, 01-3136-079-0010 MIA FL 33131 PORT OF TR D BLK 1 DESC COMM AT MOST NWLY DADE COUNTY WASD " COR OF TR 0 LYG S OF BISCAYNE BLVD WAY LIFT STATION USER' COUNTY USE s PO BOX 330316' ` 01-3138-079-0011 MIA FL 33233 UNDIV .50% UNIT OFFICE BLDG INT IN COMMON CRESCENT MIAMI CENTER LLC ELEMENTS OFF REC AREA 777MAIN ST#2100 201 S BISC BLVD.. ' - FORT WORTH TX 76102 01-3136-079-0020 f BLOCK 3 LOTS 1 THRU 14 300 ST MIAMI ONCENTRE LTD PTRS 301 YAMA O RD #3101 01-01143-001-130 3-0 BOCA RATON FL 3343-1 BLOCK 5 ALL BLOCKS 200 S BISC BLVD 01-01143-001-350 S R I MIAMI VENTURE LP % SHORENSTEIN Cb LIP Submitted irft Zthl§C@Mjb670 record in cdAWSMA" with . item on — /Y— c o' Walter Foeman U 0 _ 113 I ON Clerk of tatc.- Or,raa - __VW*4VVW__"1 3epttrtmpni of FMte I certify the attached is a true and correct copy of the Partnership Registration Statement of THE RELATED GROUP OF FLORIDA, a Florida partnership, filed on September 27., 1999, as shown by the records of this office. The document number issued to this filing is GP9900000984. CR2EO22 (1-99) Given under my hand and the Great Seal of.the State of Florida at Tallahassee, the Capital, this the Twenty-ninth day of August,.2000 Submitted into the pubft recor 'n onnection with - item on 471—r Lf_160 Walter Foeman Marns City Clerk �2ELiPtFIr1T,6 IIf PARTNERSMI? REGISTRATION STA' AME 1 The Related Group of Florida (Nsme of par�st•.tp) 2-Florida/Dade . 3 : 65—OB72492 (Scare/ uarya ors_snon) _. .. .. --- ••- z, tun es) , << 4• 2828 Coral Way, Penthouse— ( tt • xdd--' s of thir(P=udn Ofr=) A ,cti r cJj ��G S• 2828 Coral Way, Penthouse J� Miami,- Florida 33145 �. �7', (Sc -z A -esa of eipal Off= m iiondz, itapplicable) �' ys 6. In accordance with s. 620.8105(l)(c)(1 & 2), Florida Statutes,'rquirred partner iaformadon is provided in one of the following options: -- .. - Attached is a list of the names and mailing addresses of ALL partners aad Florida Registration Numbers, if other than individuals, or-. - ❑ Tae name and street address of the a;eni in Florida who shall maintain a list of the names and addresses of all pa.-Mers: . IF OTHER THAN INDIVIDUAL, NAME & FLORIDA STREET ADDRESS FLORMA REGISTRATION OF FLORIDA AGaNT NUMBER ® If any of the partners are other than individuals, its eadry name and Florida R- i mation Number must be listed below: % Rel ntt-d Fl nri do T.'M A32336 _ Related General Of Florida, LTD. A,q, n0001386 2828 Coral Way, Penthouse, Miami, FL 33145 same add rP4R i'nr lioth =:Lnersh�,� i pe Eacty Name _ Florida Dacumcat Number / The execution of this statement as a partner coastioates an affirmation under the penalties of perjury that the fncu stated herein are true. - Sio ed this 21st day of Se to r 19 99 1. ..� �. By: 'Relat F r LTD. By: Rel in Signatures of 7o-70 Partnrrs: By-. Roberto Rocha, Vice President " By: Related Genera of Florida, LTD. By: RCMInc By: — e a dez V President Types or printr ;names of partnets s�onirta � � . SubmMed Into ft •public �--- f�C#'d ire connection with C PUZ07a(S/95) ' � 7 c�raficat�ofst item— on Walter Foernan . — City Clerk - -1137 u LIST OF PARTNER NAMES: 1. RELATED FLORIDA, LTD. FLORIDA REGISTRATION #A32336 ADDRESS: 2828 CORAL WAY, PENTHOUSE SUITE MIAMI, FLORIDA 33145 2. RELATED GENERAL OF FLORIDA, LTD. FLORIDA REGISTRATION #A93000001386 ADDRESS: 2828 CORAL WAY PENTHOUSE SUITE MIAMI, FLORIDA 33145 Submitted into the public record. in.c®nnection I t � item �— Walter Foematt City Clete.; - 0-113'7 • V for 43ppar#mPnI of _49ka#P . I certify from the records of this office that MIAMI ONE CENTRE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP is- a limited partnership organized under the taws of. the State of Florida, filed on September 17, 1998. The document number of this limited partnership is A98000002180. I further certify that said limited partnership has paid all fees due this office through December 31, 2000, and its status is active. CR2E022 (1.99) Given under my hand and the Great Seal of the State of Florida at Tallahassee, the Capitol, this the Twenty-ninth day of August, 2000 rnitted into the public rd in connection with AL on Walter Foeman City Clerk 4 a*zrim '.4-4arris �EI:T'Etc`fr�T�T.(7�tFi r� L tate of Toriaa - 43ppartmpnt of _§§tatp I certify the attached is a true and correct copy of the Certificate of Limited Partnership, as amended to date, of' 'MIAMI ONE CENTRE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a limited partnership organized under the laws of the State of Florida,. as shown by the records of this office. The document number of this limited partnership is A98000002180. CR2EO22 (1-99) Given under my hand and the Great Seal of the State of Florida at Tallahassee, the Capitol, this the Twenty-ninth day of August, 2000 into the public connection with on Walter Foernan City Clerk 1Is C_ 4.erim,Kttrris �Pcr�tttr�_tttF� • • CERTIFICATE OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, OF MI.AMI ONE C$NTRS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 1. MIAMI ONE CENTRE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP (Name of. Limited. Partnership; must contain suffix such as "Limited", "Ltd -.a, or "Limited Partnership") 2. r1 4 .. 5. [IF 7. 500.0 Blue Lake Dt-ive, Suite 150, Boca Raton',, FL 33431 (The Business Add- ess'of the Limited Partnership) ,o _ Fred C . Cohen Esa•uire - �'-_ .� (Name of Registered Agent . for Service of Ptd7 e5•s) . me M. , r .;:. r: _ .. (Florida Street Address for Reg_stered Agent for Service of Process) 5000 Blue Lake Drive Suite 150 Boca'Raton F'L 33431 (The Mailing Address of -the Limited Partnership) The latest date upon which the Limited Partnership is to be dissolved is Aucrust 31, 2048. 8. NAME OF GENERAL PARTNERS) SPECIFIC ADDRESS 44 I- SLOB MT_AMI ONE CENTRE, INC. _ 5000 Blue Lake Drive Suite 150 Boca Raton, Ftj 33431 _. Submitted into the pubtiD record in cannec i yv,�Gc�'� item i�Z.� on Walter Foernan Cit '6-1 3 7 09!09/98 ��PED 06:56 F.'.= S61 881 SS09 • COIIFN.CHc"RNAl... Signed this--•—f-- day of. September, 1996. Signature of all General Partners: N.IAMI ONE CENTRE, INC- By: . . Its Du y Auth Z d Representative lied L. Siegel, P t GrNERAL PARTNER 0003 .. r < <n C N Submitted into the public recur in onnection vvith 2 item ��i on .l?/_J�►_/ !Natter Foernan 0 cITe 7 09109/98 •WED 08, 57 F1-1 561-1 1 5509 Coar;q. CHER.I.&Y...-, A-071DAVIT OF CAPITAL CONTRIBUTIONS BEFOR ME, the undersigned constituting all of the general partners of. MIAMI ONE CENTRE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Florida' Limited Partnership,_ certify as follows: ' The amount of capital contributions to date of the limited partners is $100.00. The total amount contributed and anticipated to be cc-ntri�?uted by the limited partne=s at this time totals A$100.00. This day of September, 1998. o FURTi-- .P_ AFFIANT SAYETH NOT. o-7� Under the penaltieq of perjury I declare that I have read the foregoir_g., and that the facts_ alleged are true,- to the best 'of my 0 knowledge and belief.. v�docs\�'-acione\affid.eep MIAMI ONE CENTRE, INC. its Duly•P,. oriaea resentative Ned L. Sig President a Subrhitted into the public recor m connection w•th IteM on Walter Foeman F. , City Clerk 010 i ' F FLORMA DEPAMIYMNT OF S= Secretary of State SUPPLEMENTAL AFFIDAVIT OF CAPITAL CONTRIBUTIONS FOR A FLORIDA LIMITED PARTNERSHZP The undersigned general partners of MIAMI ONE CENTRE, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Florida Limited Partnership, executed this supplemental affidavit filed pursuant to section 620.112, Florida Statutes. 'r ' The total amount of the capital contributions of the limited partners is: S 4 000 :000,DO _ This 22 day of April 119 99 - ti a ,,,R . FURTHER AFFLANT SAYETH NOT. tti M Under penalties of perjury I declare that I have read the foregoing ar4 that the facts dre ;to FX best of my knowledge and belief. - om p. N Geneial Partner(s) MIAMI ONE CENTRE INC. BY: NED L. SIEGEL, PRESIDENT Fees- , $7 per S 1000, b sad an additional contnbudoas Minimum S 52-50. Maamnm SI750.00 ' o 'the '011ti a 5ta�rYi�f e t'. r0rcord in -connection nth item_ on �' Cd urxssws� Waiter Foemali city Ciehc _ 00-113'7 DivLsioriWCorp orations P-O. Box 6327 Tallahassee, Florida 3Z314 General Partnership THE RELATED GROUP OF FLOR[DA ' 2828 Cq) 4WAX :PENTHOUSE SUITE NlAN9, FL 33145. Document Number FEI Number Date Filed _= GP9.900000984 ,. 650372462 .092711999 •::State:. _-.;:.;; : ; . ; : - Total Pages Pages in Original Filing FL 0003 0003. Status Et'Feciiv a Date Expiration Date ACTIVE, _, .. NONE .. NO. Current Partners Namc History Cancellation Date 0002 _ NONE _ . _ NONE No Filing History ' No 'Authority Infonnatiori _ No Name History Information Partners I.. FEi Charter - Name 8 Address.. lNumber Number RELATED FLORMA, LTD. 2828 CORAL. WAY, PENTHOUSE SUITE NONE A32336 1%VANC. FL 33145 RELATED GENERAL. OF FLORMk LTD. ` ri4;00000138 '• 2828 CORAL WAY. PENTHOUSE SUTE NONE MLA. L FL 33145 .._.•.._.._:::.-....,.n......•.•_.....-.•..-.••...::.::�•�.•.i+i.. .f+:-lv::v•rr....:...i•....1••.:YTv.wr:�':•-.:•_'- Submitted into the public ... record in connection with Item .�Z/� on �Y� oa Walter. Foeman 0-0 -♦ �1 r�J. 3 1 ! City Clerk 9 0 Florida Limited Partnership MIAMI 0NBCENTUL1MITED:cPARTNERSHIP mom 0 r; PRINCIPAL ADDRESS 5999.BLUE LAKE DRIVE; SUITE 150 BOCA RATON FL 33431 MAILINGADDRESS 5000 BLUE LAKE DRIVE, SUITE 150 BOCA RATON FL 33431 Doctrment'Number FEI Number Date Filed A98000002180 630864669 09/17/1998 State. Status EffectiveDate FL ACTIVE Last.Event Event Date Filed Event Effective Date CONTRIBUTION CHANGE 04f27/1999 NONE Actual Contribution 4,000,000.00 Registered Agent Name & Address ......... ....... COREN. FP ED C ESQ. 712 U.S. HIGHWAY ONE. SUM 400 NORTH PALM BEACH FL 33480 .. ........ ... Documen'i -General Partner Detail t Number .'s "Name &Address 5000.BLUE LAKE DRIVE, SUM 150 1P98000036018 BOCA RATON FL 33431 .... ..... . ........ ... . . . ............. ... Annual ... I- Filed Date I#ta19 gibleT Reports....._. Report Year --------- . .. . ...... 1999 04127/1999 '1 -Suballtted-into the pub116- 2000 04/2812000 record in connection With. Km`j�—T'on 7-:,M(�;�' Walter Foeman 00-1137 City Clerk Submitted into the public .record in connection with item ,2LL on —/ti-oo Walter Foeman O 0 -113'7 Cite Clerk 1 0 `ONE-MiAMI P1 O9 CT,DIRECTQRY. ;. _ Applicant The Related Grou of Florida p Jorge Perez, President" 2828 Coral Way, PFi I-° Phone: (305) 460-9900 Miami, Florida 33145 Fax: (305) 445-1934 amarilys@elated.usa.com ' Asst:-'Alicia Ruffin - _ >Tony Albanese _: Senor Vice. -President - ,.:..:. Phone: (305) 460-9900 .,..,_.-.Fax: (3051445-1834;.. .:.. .. Cell: (305493.-3846 Architect Arquitectonica Bernardo Fort -Brescia 550 Bnckell Avenue Louis B.. St. Clair Suite 200 Phone: (305) 372-1812 Miami, Florida 33131 Fax: (305) 372-1175 Email`. lst.'clair@a-rqmlanu.com Landscape Architect Curtis Rogers Design Studio -Inc. 2982 Grand Avenue, Suite 301 Coconut Grove, Florida 33133 Civil Consul -Tech Engineering, Inc. 10570 N.W. 27' Street + Suite 101 Miami, Florida 33.112 Donnell, Duquesne & Albaisa, P.A. 4930 S.W. 74's Court I-,Iiami, Florida 33155 U Richard H: Rogers Phone: (305).442-1774 Fax: (305) 445-9488 Email: currog@bellsouth.net Marco A. Osorio, P.E. Phone: (305) 599-3141 Fax: (305) 599-3143 Email: mosorio@cte.cc Ramon Donnell, V.E. Phone: (305) 666-0711 Fax: (305) 666-5259 1 Submitted into the public record in connection with item 2LL on—/c(--oe Walter Foeman City Clerk 00-113"7 • • Page 2 Traffic David Plummer & Associates David Plumrrier,; President 1750 Ponce de Leon Blvd. Phone: 305/447-0900 Coral Gables, FL 3,3134 Fax: 305/444-4986 tiniilf& d luri i@dp _p l uinmer.corn Asst.: Susan Killmeyer Marine/Enviro6ment,,d_',_. Coastal Systems 1ritemational, Inc. Christy Brush 464 S. Dixie Highway Phone: -(305) 66 1-3655,_ Coral Gables, FL 33.146 Phone: --(305) 661-19:14- Email: Cbrush@CoastalSystemslnt.com Economic Sharpton, Brunson & Company Darryl Sharpton - One SE Third Avenue '?liohe: (305) 374--15 ' 7-4- Suite 2100 = Fax: (305) 371.8161 Miami, Florida 33131 Email: dks@sbccpa.com Legal Greenberg Traurig, P.A. - Es Lucia A. Dougherty, cj: 1221 Brickell Avenue Phone: (305) 579-0603 Mianii, Fl, 33131 Fax: (305) 961-5603 Eniail:, dougher l@gtlaw.com Asst.: Brenda Chisholm Adrienne Friesner Pardo, Esq. Phone. (305) 579-0683 Fax: (305) 961-5683 Email: pardoaoagtlaw.corrC Asst.: Marisol Gonzalez 10 9 Submitted into the public record In connection with -item DZ-� on f-2-1'(-O Walter Foeman Cite Clerk 00-1137 ONEMiAML '000 Blur Lake Drive, $uirc } 50 • Boo; Racon, Ff. 33431. Phone: 561/998.9200 • Fax: 561/998.788 Submitted into the public record in. connection with item L-i on--14(—oa Walter Foeman City Gferk' 00-113'7 ONE MIAMI MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT PROJECT DESCRIPTION ARTICLE It. Project Description A. Zoning Ordinance No. 11006 1. Section 1304.2.1 Application forms; supplementary materials 2. Section 1702.2.1 General Report 3.. Section 1702.2.2 Major Use Special Permit Concept Plan 4. Section 1702.2.3 ,Development Impact Study Submitted into the public record in connection with item .S on—/Y--oa Walter Foeman 00 _ 113 "7 City Cleric. ONE h1IAMI AMENDMENT TO THE MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT 1. Section 1304.1.1 Application Forms; Supplementary Materials. (a) Statements of ownership and control of the proposed development activity. The Disclosure of Ownership and Ownership Affidavit are provided in Article (b) ` Statement describing in detail the direction and intended.use of the 'development or activity. One Miami represents the first new commercial and residential development in downtown Miami, north of the Miami River, in many years. The project is being .designed by the acclaimed architectural firm of Arquitectonica. One • Miami will be a .landmark project for the city and at its completion, it will become the .Beacon for , 'a revised downtown.. New jobs and work opportunities will be created as a result of this project. And very importantly, the project will create an outstanding pedestrian and waterfront experience along the Bayfront in a pleasant and safe environment. The property is located at 205 South Biscayne Boulevard, Miami, Florida, Also known as One Miami Parcel. "A'. The project will be named "One Miami".. It will consist of a 34-story, `707,025 gross square foot office tower and a 49-story, 425 unit, 626,552 gross square foot multi -family residential tower with related amenities. The site is. a 3.04 net acre parcel (4.89 gross acres) on the north side of the Miami,River at the confluence with Biscayne Bay.. The unique location makes -this site one of Miami's most visible and impressive. The 34-story office tower is located at the West Side of the .site, with --a two- story lobby starting from Biscayne Boulevard and ending with a circular drop- . off at the East -Side, facing the 'water. The lobby:. will offer access to a restaurant Ias well as other, ancillary retail 'stores. - Floors 2 to 5 include the technical (MEP) and office service spaces and secured parking area. The typical office floor plan is abut 22,6.10 square feet and is served by two groups of elevators, one for the low-rise floor, and the other for the high-rise floors. The south elevation is designed as ,.a smooth curve, reinf9rcing the water - views., The building top (parapet wall) wiU conceal the cooling towers and ,'elevator overruns. Both the base and top of the office. tower form '.4 parallelogram designed to provide a dynamic movement. The skin of the building is silver metallic combined with reflective blue-green glass and blue Submitted into the public record in connection with item on—/V--Oe Walter Foeman 0 0 -113ry City Clerk metallic panels. The service areas, all located within the building, provides storage, receiving, loading and FPL transformer vaults and are located behind the lobby -and in the ground floor parking area. The residential tower is located on the East Side of the property. The ground floor includes the lobby and auxiliary use (shop, food service) and technical service (mechanical, electrical, and plumbing) spaces. The building is composed of an elongated 45-story volume and a tower of 49 stories at the east -end. There are 1 to 3 bedroom apartments of varying size. The lower 13 stories areconnected with the adjacent parking garage structure. Valet parking will be available to tenants and.patrons of the building." In order to maximize privacy, the building includes three cores of two rapid elevators each serving from two to four. apartments. Every 'apartment offers a bay. and/or river view. The majority of units have cross ventilation. The structure is concrete and masonry block, .the exterior skin is stucco, painted in aqua colds (blues and greens). The east volume .tower is designed to directionally express the development towards the water. The top deck of the parking garage includes garden, a fitness club with two tennis courts and an "infinity", type swimming pool. A lap pool, spa and party . room are located on the ground floor. A public cafe will be located at the north east corner. A 20 foot .wide baywalk pedestrian walkway along the entire 950 foot water side property line, fora .,total .of 19,000 square feet. will . be .used as a public area. "The walkway will. include landscaping, design. pavers, sitting and viewing area. Tall palm ttees, and other plantings, _will punctuate the edge., of the shoreline in order to'soften the perception of the water's edge, and maintain a typical Miami atmosphere. The docking walkway proposed at the edge of the pedestrian walkway, at the lower level will further emphasize the marine character of the design. The 12-story .parking garage will include approximately 1,800 parking spaces and four 12 foot by 35 foot loading areas and two 12 foot by 55 foot loading spaces. The primary entry for tenants and guests to the building will be through the two entries located � on the vehicular street along the river. Serviceaccess and express exit. at rush hour will be via Biscayne Boulevard. -,Security control between office and residential parking Aoccurs at every " parking floor. The ground floor of the garage will be used exclusively for: service and valet parking. Vehicular access to One Miami from the north will be from Biscayne Boulevard, from the south from Brickell Avenue and from the west.from the 1-95 exit ramp. Valet and self -parking will be available on site. Vehicular access for the project will be from Biscayne Boulevard through the vehicular street parallel to the Miami River. Circular drop-off for each tower Submitted into the public record in connection.. with item —� on -- /V� o0 Walter Foeman 0 0 —113'7 City Clerk will facilitate traffic flow and access to the main lobby entrances. The parking garage is also accessed from this vehicular circulation: one 4-lane entry for upper levels and a second 2-lane entry for valet parking on ground floor. The service access for both towers will be off Biscayne Boulevard, on the north side of the property. One of the two lanes will be used as the parking garage's express exit during rush hour. One Miami will also be accessed by pedestrians from downtown Miami along the Bayfront walk and the Brickell Avenue area, as well as by boat from the Miami River or Biscayne Bay. The plaza surrounding the Property will create a pedestrian friendly urban environment and will become the core amenity for the project and natural extension of the Bayfront experience. Pedestrian traffic for the project is primarily accomplished by the wide pedestrian walkway along the Miami River. and Biscayne Bay, which is separated from vehicular traffic, but connected with the buildings at several points. This pedestrian walkway will include a focal element and destination at the west end (Biscayne Boulevard) and also a destination and "view place" at the southeast corner. Secondary pedestrian traffic is also provided along the vehicular circulation on the buildings' side. The 13`h level of the parking garage building will serve as a recreation deck for the development and will include indoor and outdoor amenities. The indoor recreational facilities will include: exercise rooms, spa, Jacuzzi, lockers, bathrooms and showers. Exterior facilities will include a pool, two tennis courts, garden and sun deck. There will also be a cafe and bar, as well as a garden and trellis covered pergola. Thus, creating the atmosphere of a courtyard for the use of the office tenants and residents. Drawings showing the architectural character and location of the intended uses are included under Tab 6 of the 'Supporting Documents. pedestrian linkage. and waterfront experience in a pleasant and safe environment. (c) General location map, showing relation of the site or activity for which special permit is sought to major streets, schools, existing utilities, shipping areas, important physical features in and adjoining the project or activity and the like. I The following exhibits are included with the Major Use Special Permit Application: Submitted into the public record in connection with item —S on /vim "' Walter Foeman 0 0 - 113 7 City Clerk (1) Aerial: Aerial photograph of the surrounding area indicating the project site. (2) Area Context Map/Site Aerial: Map of the project area indicating buildings and their functions that surround the site. (3) Location Map: Map of the surrounding street system indicating the project location. (d) A. site plan containing the title of the project and the names of the project planner and developer, date, and north arrow and, based on an exact survey of the property drawn to a scale of sufficient size to show. The general information requested is shown on the Overall Plans Sheets A1.1 to A1.13 provided under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. The site plan includes the following: 1. Boundaries of the project, any existing streets, buildings, watercourses, easements and section lines. The boundaries of the project and the location of existing streets and easements,are shown on the Survey located under Tab 5 of the Supporting Documents. 2. Exact location of all buildings and structures. The property is vacant and has no buildings as shown on. the Boundary Survey under Tab 5. The location of the building to the constructed is shown on the Site Plan Al.I and the Ground Floor Plan sheet A1.2 located under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. 3. Access and traffic flow and how vehicular traffic will be separated from pedestrian and other types of traffic. Vehicular access to One Miami from the north will be from Biscayne Boulevard, from the south from Brickell Avenue and.from the west from the I-95 exit ramp. Valet and self parking will be available on site. Vehicular access for the project will be from Biscayne Boulevard through the vehicular street parallel to the Miami River. Circular drop-off for each tower will facilitate traffic flow and access to the main lobby entrances. The parking earage is also accessed from this vehicular circulation: one 4-lane Submitted into the public record in connection with item -5 on /Y-O° Walter Foeman 0 0 _ 113'7 City Clerk entry for upper levels and a second 2-lane entry for valet parking on ground floor. The service access for both towers will be off Biscayne Boulevard, on the north side of the property. One of the two lanes will be used as the parking garage's express exit during rush hour. One Miami will also be� accessed by pedestrians from downtown Miami and the Brickell Avenue area, as well as by boat from the' Miami River or Biscayne Bay. The plaza surrounding the Property will create a pedestrian friendly urban environment. Pedestrian traffic .for the project is primarily accomplished by the wide pedestrian walkway along the Miami River and Biscayne Bay, which is separated from vehicular traffic but connected with the buildings at several points. This pedestrian walkway will include a "siting place" at the west end (Biscayne Boulevard) and a "view place" at the southeast corner. Secondary pedestrian traffic is also provided along the vehicular circulation on the buildings' side. A detailed anaylsis of the site access and traffic flow is provided in the Traffic Impact Analysis located under Tab 2 of the Supporting Document. 4. Off-street parking and off-street loading areas. The off street parking facility is located within the parking garage levels ground floor through 12"' floor. The parking structure will have 1,834 parking spaces, which will support the entire development. The garage is shown on Sheets Al. la to Al.6a provided under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. The Zoning Ordinance requires six loading bays, (4) 12' x 35' and (2) 12 x 55', all provided on the Ground/Floor Plan, Sheet A1.2, under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. 5. Recreational facilities locations. The 13'' level of the parking garage building will serve as a recreation deck for the development and will include indoor and outdoor amenities. The indoor recreational facilities will include: exercise rooms, spa, Jacuzzi, lockers, bathrooms and showers. Exterior facilities will include a pool, two tennis courts, Garden and sun deck. There will also be a cafe and bar, as well as a garden and trellis covered pergola. Thus, creating the atmosphere of a courtyard for the use of the office tenants and residents. Submitted into the public record in connection with item on - /Y- oa Waiter Foeman O 0 -113 7 city Clerk These facilities are shown .on the architectural Plan A1.7 and on the Landscape Plans under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. 6. Screens and buffers. Along Brickell Avenue and. One Miami Street trees will create a soft edge to the pro. -ct. • Landscaped areas are indicated on the Architectural and Landscape Plans located under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. 7. Refuse collections areas. Waste collectiod will be provided by a containerized compactor system located within the service area in the building. In addition, the project will have a high rise recycling system for the residential units. These facilities are shown on the architectural Plan, Sheet'A1.2 located under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. 8. Access to utilities and points of utilities hookups. Access and connections to site utilities are discussed in the Site Utility Study located under Tab 3 of the Supporting Documents. (e) Tabulations of total gross acreage in the project and the percentages thereof proposed to be devoted to; 1. The various permitted uses. Building area 42.3% of gross lot area (footprint 90,495 S.F.) Open area, plazas, exterior courts and streets: 41,927 S-.F. 31.6% of net lot area 2.: Ground coverage by structures Ground coverage by the structures is 46°lo of the total gross lot area. (f) Tabulation showing the following: 1. The derivation of numbers of off-street parking and off-street loading spaces shown in (d) above. Submitted into the public record in connection with item on h2--/4(-oa Walter Foernan 0 0 _ 113 7 7 The landscape plans showing vegetation are found on the Landscape Plan, Sheets L1.1, L1.2, & L2. All landscape plans are located under tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (t) Plans for recreation facilities, if any, including location and general description of buildings for such use. The 13`� level of the parking garage will serve as a pool and recreational deck for the residential units and members for the Health Club. A garden area at the lobby level will provide a visual accent for the lobby. Exterior facilities will include a swimming pool, tennis court, garden and sun decks, with trellis and pavilion structure. On the IP level, a health spa will adjoin the pool deck and include a fitness center, spa, steam and sauna rooms, and Jacuzzi with access to the sun decks. The health spa and recreational facilities will be for use of residents and members. (m) Such additional data maps, plans, or statements as may be required for the particular use or activity involved. The details of the spaces and calculations used to compute the Floor Area Ratio (FAR) are shown on the Al.l Plan provided under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (n) Such additional data as the applicant may believe is pertinent to the proper consideration of the site and development plan. Sections and elevations depicting the architectural character of the building are shown on the Architectural Drawings. Sheets A1,10, A1.11, A1.12 :through A2.9, A3.12, A3.13, A3.14. All elevations and sections are located under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. 2. Section 1702.2.1 General Report. -= (a) Property ownership and beneficial interest within the boundaries of the area proposed for Major Use Special Permit. Statement of Ownership and beneficial interest within the boundaries of the area proposed for Major Use Special Permit are provided in Article 1. (b) The nature of the unified interest or control. . Suhmftte�, �Q�Rrl��e�iiabt}�ticle I. recordin c'onnection vilith s item y�on —/Y—oa Waiter Foeni an O _ 1 S rity cill-1 , 3 7 (c) Survey of the proposed area showing property lines and ownership. A copy of the Survey is included under Tab 5 of the Supporting Documents. (d) Map of existing features, including streets, alleys, easements, utilities lines, existing land use; general topography, and physical features. The existing site features and utility lines are shown on the . Boundary Survey of .the property located under Tab 5. The site features and the utilities are also described in, the Site Utility Study, located under a Tab 3 of the Supporting Documents. (e) Materials to demonstrate therelationship of the elements listed in (4) preceding to surrounding area characteristics. The Drawings submitted with this Application are located under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (f) Existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan designations for the area on arld around the lands proposed for Major Use Special Permit. The zoning designation for the property pursuant to City of Miami Ordinance No. 11000 and Page 36 of the Zoning Atlas Map which is located in Article I, indicates the existing and surrounding zoning designations. The zoning designation for the Property is CBD, Central Business District. The comprehensive plan future land use designation for the Property is Commercial Business District. The zoning and the comprehensive plan designations are consistent with one another. 3. Section 1702.2.2 Major Use Special Permit Concept Plan. (a) Relationships of the concept plan to surrounding existing and proposed future uses, activities, systems, and facilities (transportation, recreation, view corridors,.'pedestrian systems, service systems and similar uses). Article 11 contains a written narrative of this project outlining proposed uses and activities. This narrative also contains descriptions of the project's relationship to traffic, pedestrian movements, and .transportation access. The list of drawings submitted is found under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. Submitted into the public record in . connection vvith item on Walter Foeman 4 e 1 3 Oil ifiar';! 11 (b) Existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan principles and designations. This project conforms with the CBD, Central Business District zoning district designation for the Property. The comprehensive plan future land use designation conforms with the land use designation currently in effect for the Property. 4. Section 1702.2.3 Development Impact Study. (a) A traffic analysis shall be submitted for an area within approximately '/. mile of the site, or an area including the major intersections to be impacted by the,site, whichever is larger. , The Traffic Impact analysis is included under Tab 2 of the Supporting Documents. .(b) Economic Impact data shall be provided, including estimates for construction costs, construction employment, and permanent employment and shall demonstrate that the proposed development is favorable to the economy, public services, environment and housing supply ofthe City. The Economic Impact Study is included under Tab 4 of the Supporting Documents. (c) A housing Impact assessment. There will be 425 residential units within the development. The units will be affordable to middle and upper income individuals. (d) A description of proposed energy conservation measures shall be provided, including only those 'measures thAt are proposed in addition to the minimum requirements in State Energy Code. Architecturally, the office building envelope will be comprised of reflected tinted glass, metal panels and the roof. The residential building envelope will be masonry walls with stucco and tinted, glass. All exterior and landscape lighting will be controlled by means of time clocks and photocell switches. Energy saving lamps, ballasts and fixtures are being considered at cores and public spaces. (e) , Historic Buildings There are no historic structures located on the Property. Submitted into the public record in connection with item on r 2— /4(' oa Walter Foeman 00-113'7 (� Environmental Zone . The Property is not located within an environmental preservation district. The Property is located within the Archaeological Conservation Area. ONE MIAMI MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS ARTICLE 111. -Supporting Documents Tab I Minority Construction Employment Plan Tab 2 Traffic Impact Analysis Tab 3 Site Utility Study Tab 4 Economic Impact Study Tab 5 Survey of Property Tab 6 Drawings Submitted 1 f / Submitted. into the public record in''connection with item 2- on. L /Y- 00 Waiter Foeman o.0 _ 113'7 . 0 r I Submitted into the public record in connection uvvith item -'S on —/Y-oa Waiter Foeman 0 0_ 1 1 3 7 The Relatad GrocP of Florida 2828.Cora1 Way. Penthouse Suite . • : �tiiiiiu;�Floridn3�145 -- . - , , .. ..: , : _; - Tel. (305) 460-9900, Fax (305) 4bo-9911 ... I ° _ POLI'CY STATEMENT . Our company policy is to provide equal employment, opportunities-.to:all _ ; „ , yets w ' applicaats°arid'emploout regard to race, color, religion, sex , age, national origin, handicapped canditionor status,as.a:disablad and/or Vietnam.f-ra veteran and to affirmatively seek to advance the principles of equal em to ent P -'PPo�ty.` The company takes=affirmative action to-insure'that`applicants and employees are not discriminated against because -of their -status as handicapped- - persons: We affirm that the above policy and the Affirmative Action Program herewith -reflect the company's attitude and its intention to: 1. Recruit, hire, train and promote for all job classifications without. regard to -handicapped condition. 2. Base decisions on employment as to further the principles of equal employment opportunity for qualified handicapped persons. 3. Insure'thit all other personnel actions such as compensation, promotions, benefits, transfers, terminations, Company -sponsored training, educational tuition assistance, social and recreational programs arc administered without regard to handicapped condition. The company, incompliance with the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, maintains a written Affirmative Action Program. The Affirmative Action Program is made available to employees, upon request, in the Personnel Department during working hours. Overall responsibility for directing and 'implementing the policy enunciated herein and the Company's Affirmative Action Program for qualified handicapped persons has been'assigned to Wanda Ponce, Personnel and Payroll Administrator, 2828 Coral Way, Miami, Florida 33145, 305-460-9900, who serves as the company's Equal Employment Opportunity Coordinator. All personnel actions are analyzed to insure that this policy and the Affirmative Action Program are being properly implemented. i The company is determined to be in full compliance with the provisions of the law and of the Affirmative Action Program. Submitted into the public record in connection vdth item on Wafter Foeman 0 0 _ 113 7 v■ ■Lr Iw;11Q1111; September, 2000(R) , 400124 j Submitted into the public record in connection vvith item on Walter Foeman 00-1137 One Miami MUSP:TratTc Impact Stud TABLE OF CO.N,TENTS aae EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................. ..:. .................... r 1.1,., . Study Area .. ..... ................. 1 1.2 'Study Obi ctive .. `. ".. .:... �` ; °, :....:. ....... .. ......... 1 2.0 EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS ......................: ............. 3 2:1=DatarCollection: ...:':. .... ......... ............ ...3 2.1.1 Roadway Characteristics .................................. 3 2.1.2 Intersection Volumes ..................................... 5 -`2.1:3 Intersection Data ........................................... 5 -2:2 Roadway Capacity Analysis .. ...... ..........:......: 8 2.3 -Intersection Capacity Analysis ... ... .. . . 9 .3.0 PLANNED. AND PROGRAMMED ROADWAY.IMPROVEMENTS .............. 10 4.0 FUTURE TRAFFIC"CONDITIONS ....:.:. :. ....... 11 4.:1 Background Traffic ...:...... . .. _ .......................... 11 4.2 Committed Developments . .. .. •.. ......... ....... . 11 4.3 Project Traffic ........................� ..... ................ 15 = 4.3.1 -Project Trip Generation ............................. . .. . 15 4.3.2 Project Trip Assignment .... _.. .... :15. 4.4 Future Traffic Conditions with Project ............................. 18 5.0 CONCLUSIONS ............................ ..................... 21 Appendix A: Attachment D1: Trip Generation Rates for Downtown DRI Appendix B: Intersection Capacity Analysis Worksheets Submitted into the public record in connection with item on Page i Walter Foeman O 0 —113 "7 One Miami MUSP Tiafflirlmpaet S[uey LIST OF EXHIBITS Page 1 Location Map . .......... ... ... ... ..... .......... 2 2 2000 PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes .. .. .. .............. 6 . 3. Existing Lane Configurations. .... .... 7 4 Existing (2000) Roadway Capacity Analysis ........ ..................... 8 .5 Existing (2000) Intersection Capacity Analysis Results .. ................... 9 6 Committed Developments PM Peak Hour Trip Generation ................. 12 7,. -Committed .Developments Cardinal Distribution (2005, Stage) ..... .. 13 8, ,. Future PM _Peak: Hour Traffic Volumes without Project r, ..... ,..... _ , .. ,...... 14 9- :.Proiect.Trio Generation, -:PM Peak Hour.......,..:-..... ......_.- .... 15 10 Project Cardinal Distribution (2005 Stage) ........ :. :............... 16 41- Project Traffic Assignment ..................................... ...... 17 1.2 Future PM Peak.Hour Traffic -Volumes with Project, ...._... _ 19 13 Future Intersection Capacity Analysis Results with Project .-.:.,.: _........:..=..:.:. 18 .: 14 Future Roadway. Capacity Analysis with Project ......:..:...... 20 Submitted into the public record in cgrinection yeith item on / c(—OC Page it Walter Foeman The"b-n'emi"iiii 'p-'r'o-j*e'c'i-;i's' a'-pfbpose'd- use development located in Downtown Miami, Florida. The mixed proposed project would occupy four parcels of land adjacent to the DuPont Plaza Hotel in Downtown oje'd.-The proposed Mani 4iic,fi�ffi,e-rit3b is--- 0 , i �t' ` ' f " , fl` Miimi',�(-This�;stddy 7r', Parcel; r f F 6 (8 -OFA)- -f dMde-which includes of 707,025,squate, -,-:ff66F'a'rea development consists -feet of�gross ancillary - retail' A25 residential dwelling uruts,"andah 1834 vehicle parking g ar "a go 6.Act ess to the project garage is proposed tbirough 4 main driveway at Biscayne Boulevard Way/SE 4 Street and a secondary driveway* for egress during the afternoon peak hours only, at approximatelyrnidblock south of SE 3 S . treet. .'Buildo"d 'forthe" proposed One Miami is anticipated by the year 2003. The 'trips generated by the "proposed- development were estimated using the trip generation, rates established by the Downtown MiamiDevelopment of Regional -Impact (DRI). It was estimated that the prdposed-One Miami would generate approximately 480 motor veSicles per hour during the PM peak period, The Downtown DRI trip generation rates already account for travel by -other modes of transportation. A list of committed developments in the area was identified. In the early 1980's, the City of Miami prepared an, areawide Application for Development Approval (ADA) that gives .the City jurisdiction over the, approval of any development withi�a, the downtown area. The document is referred to as the Downtown Miami Areawide DRI or Downtown Miami DRI. The intent of this process was to measure the regional impacts fr,6rft estimated growth in this area. The Development Order (DO) issued allowed the.City to approve both local and regional size projects as long as the proposed development conformed with the mitigatiQn requirements ements adopted in the DO. The MUSP Traffic Impact Study for One Miami was performed in accordance with the requirements of the Downtown kidmi DRI. 'Analysis of future (2003) traffic conditions with the project during PM peak, hour shows that the Downtown Miami DRIs adopted Level of Service E standard will not be exceeded Submitted into the public record in connection veith =r on.4 item -2 Walter Foeman 00 -1137 record in � connection with iv item �S on Waiter Foeman 0-113'7 • SE 2 Street /SE 2 Avenue - • I-95 Ramps / SE 3 Street /SE 2 Avenue • SE 3 Street /SE 3 Avenue • SE 3 Street / Biscayne Boulevard • SE 4 Street /SE 2 Avenue • SE 4 Street /SE 3 Avenue 1.2 STUDY OBJECTIVE Approvals for Parcel A, increment one of the One Miami project, are sought under the DO issued to the Downtown Miami DRL The objective of this traffic study is to assess possible localized PM peak hour impacts as a result of this project. Submitted into the public record in connection with Walter Fooman 0 0 _ 1 13P�` I �� ` r�iR:%�■.,��■■�■_jam _.. r��■r©® ®err®■�, err w����rr�mrr■�■ -.. -�rmr■■rr�� • i ONE MIAMI 3 — 5S y #Is WT ST W8S7 I LEGEND ® STUDY AREA J �P z 90 \ 0 dONE MIAMI Submitted into the public MUSP TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY t2Pilord inn lam INi' // on J EXHIBIT 1� iMiiSPTra11'ic lmpok'Study O EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS Data cof lechoii `for this study included roadway `characteristics, intersection'data'iirtersection volumes,' and signal tiining" The" data`collection effort `is described' in detail' in the'following sections. - - "2:1` 1 Roadway='Charact6ris tics Brickell Avenue Brickell Avenue is one of the major arterials in Downtown Miami and connects the Central Business District (CBD) and the Brickell Area. It is a 6-lane, divided roadway with a raised median. Brickell Avenue in the immediate vicinity to the project site (south of SE 4 Street over the Miami River) operates as a two- way, 5-lane (2-northbound lanes and 3-southbound lanes), divided roadway. The bridge is 6 lanes wide but the northbound lanes narrow to 2 lanes due to right-of-way constraints. The roadway then widens to a 6-lane divided section with a landscaped median south of the Miami River. The extension of Brickell Avenue north of SE 4.Street :is SE 2 Avenue. Northbound traffic on Brickell Avenue must turn right onto eastbound SE 4 Street, which extends east to become Biscayne Boulevard Way. The posted speed limit is 30 miles per hour (mph). On -street parking is not permitted along Brickell Avenue within the study limits. Biscayne Boulevard Biscayne Boulevard is also a major arterial in Downtown Miami. It is a two-way, divided arterial. The number of lanes varies from 6 to 8 within the downtown area. Biscayne Boulevard between SE 2 Street and NE 5 Street has a wide median, which operates as a municipal parking lot by the Miami Parking System. It provides the CBD area with connectivity to I-395 and Miami Beach. On -street metered parking is permitted on limited portions of the Biscayne Boulevard southbound approach. The elevated Metromover runs along the Biscayne Boulevard median between SE 2 Street and NE11 Street. The Metromover's Bayfront Park $tation is located on Biscayne Boulevard in the vicinity of SE 2 Street. Biscayne Boulevard becomes a one-way northbound roadway in the immediate vicinity of the project site (between SE 4 Street and SE 2 Street). The posted speed limit within the stag&W,0 AAhe public recordin connection with jiggl ^ Walter Foeman ® 0 _ 11901115 3 '..One Miami +MUSP,Lon 'u impact Study — — SEEM 2 Avenue SE/NE 2 Avenue is a 3-lane, one-way southbound roadway that,provi,,,es:Downtown Mi'a ru with:access to the interstate highways I-395 and I-95. The number of lanes in the immediate vicinity of the study area � SE.2 Avenue provides vanes.from 3 (north of SE 2 Street) to 5 lanes (betweeenen SE 3 Street and SE 4,Street). access to the I-95 ramps via SE 3 Street. SE 2 Avenue extends, south of SE 4 Street to become Brickell Avenue. On -street parking is not permitted on either. side of SE 2 Avenue The posted speed limit is 30 mph. _ - E�Avenue SE 3 Avenue is a 34ane, one-way northbound arterial between SE 4 Street to the south and Flagler Street to the north. It becomes NE 3 Avenue north of'Flagler Street and terminates at NE 2 Street. On -street parking is permitted on certain portions of SE 3 Avenue. The posted speed limit is 30 mph. SE 2 Street SE 2 Street is a westbound one-way street. It starts as a 5-lane section between Biscayne Boulevard and SE 3 Avenue, and narrows to 2 lanes west of SE 2 Avenue. A substantial percentage of SE 2 Avenue traffic is destined for I-95 via SE 2 Avenue and SE 3 Street. The posted speed limit is 30 mph. On -street parking is not permitted along SE 2 Street within the study limits. SE 3 Street SE 3 Street west of SE 2 Avenue is a two-way, 4-lane, divided roadway with a posted speed limit of 30 mph. SE 3 Street provides direct access (on-ramp/off-ramp) to I-95. The Miami Metromover is located centerline of SE 3 Street between SE 2 Avenue and Biscayne Boulevard. SE 3 Street is a 2-lane, one-way eastbound roadway east of SE 2 Avenue and .is divided by the Metromover's elevated rail structure. On - street parking is not permitted on either side of the roadway. SE 4 Street/Biscayne Boulevard WaX SE 4 Street is a 4-lane, one-way eastbound roadway between SE 2 Avenue and SE 3 Avenue. It extends east to become Biscayne Boulevard Way between SE 3 Avenue and Biscayne Boulevard. Biscayne Boulevard Way is a 2-lane, one-way eastbound roadwa:'UAt§h1e49j9is� �Glevard Way is the main record in connection vaith UPm JZ--S on Waiter Foeman .0 0 — 1314 One Miami "USP- 7rwiOmpact,Studv access for Brickell Avenue traffic heading northinto the -C8D areavia Biscayne Boulevard..0n-street metered parking is permitted on both sides of Biscayne.Boulevard Way. The posted speed limit is 30 mph. 2.1.2 Intersection Volumes j. Consistent with.the,Downtown Miami.DRI traffic study,.;geak hour vehicle turning movement counts were collected .at the; intersections :under study.. Seasonal -adiustment faptors.were obtained from the. Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT). Exhibit 2 shows the 2000 PM peak hour traffic volumes at the intersections under_ study.:. 2A.3 Intersection Data_ Afield survey was conducted -to determine the lane configurations for the roadways and intersections.under study: Existing signal timing data was obtained from Miami -Dade County for the intersections to be analyzed. This information provided the signal phasing and timing used in the intersection capacity analysis. Exhibit 3 shows the existing lane configurations for:all intersections -and. roadways studied.. Submitted into the public record in connection with item_ on f2—/Y-04 (� — Walter Foeman(° 3 cis, r`i�tr� I i i i r r . ' 1 I jr r I I I nLr V g i I' Q iM t f _ 0 — — a t s2 BAlfffONT v PARK t '� ,m - DD t 41 v CHOPIN PLAZA l _ ),I ^. i FIRST l i 1 1 UNION ... N BUILDING i ' i I i S.E. 3 ST-------- -•---------- —r: ------------ _ — n 4p 4p a0 --,I ----------- 1 i i 1 _ LLj > C [n W �' B I ct� I M I I z tli� ;U� SE 4 ST --..-- BISC. BLVD_WAY —:--_ )CD 0, �I D 1.004 i v X I .D a 0 4. UI 0 I M■ 1 DUPONT PLAZA HOTEL r � I --�-'MIAMI RIVER DESIGNATION 250--"- HOURLY VOLUME ' dp - SIGNAL DAV 1 D PLUWkR 8 ASSOCIATES, INC. ONE MIAMI IBANSP00U110N . CIVIL • SIMUC1UNAL • [NVIROMCNI'L MUSP TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY •w.S9":.r:.':` ES ra_.r.• 101! E".'..e..r...r..F.or PxYalL.C. uLL. - ar.ee Aa WN 2000 PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMFS r ~ Ls' d 40 1) cRD � •------- ------ lilt CD �rf j:j DUPONT PLAZAHOTEL �y �MIAMI RIVER ..oxn. DAVID PLUW ER a ASSOCIATES,INC. ONE MIAMI pm IR�NfPO[iLllla[1 „` CIYtI :+AU"1,aA. • ["Y+"0 sjoM " MUSP TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY 1011[ N[I1S - Kfi PIL . cau c.e1[s ... ENTAL �9 EXISTING LANE CONFIGURATION — 2.2 ROADWAY CAPACM6ANALYSiS '.. -.e S ! f, Roadway capacity is the maximum number of vihtcles that caA pass through a given point during a,,specific tlme,period under prevailing roadway and traffic*t6fid6l,device conditions. The Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) defines"six levels of h LO service (LOS), witS "1"representing the best operating conditions, and LOS "F"representing the worst. The Downtown MianarDR[has adopted minimum LOS "E" for the study area. In accordance with the Downtown Miami Mr, the analysis of existm traffic condition's was performed for _ Average Annual Daily Traffic-(AADT) for PM peak hour conditions For this analysis, service volumes were obtained from the generalized service volume. -tables published in FDOT's �1998 Florida's Level of Service Standards and Guidelines Md ual. for Planning , t The summaryof existing levels of service for .roadway segments in the study area is shown in Exhibit 4. Exhibit 4 Existing (2000) Roadway Capacity Analysis Weekday PM Peak Hour_ Conditions, Peak Direction Roadway Limits Direction Number of Volume Service LOS Lanes Volume (LOS Erg') Biscayne North of.: NB , 4LD .. 1,309 C Boulevard SE 2 Street SB - 4 LD .1,363 3,140 . C Brickell South of NB 2LD 1,286 C Avenue SE 4 Street SB 3LD 1,571 2,560 C SE 2 Avenue just north of 2 Street SB 3L One-way 718 3,170 C SE 2 Street just west of SE 2 Ave WB 2L One-way 490 2,100 C SE 3 Street. just west of SE 2 Ave EB 2LD 904 1,750 C WB 2LD 1,539 D ��u.. �. vcuciaiucu rcax nuur rea& Uliecuonal volumes, rvu1's 19Y8 LUJ' Manual, Submitted into the public record in connection with Waiter Foeman " One. -Miami 2.3 INTERSECTIOWCAPACITY ANALYSIS The, interseptign'. capafity,-analysis, wa $..performed using Highway Capacity Software (HCS), based on procedures of Ahe 1997.Highway Capacity Manual. Exhibit 5 shows the resulting LOS for existing conditions,at the itgeqgctioja =der,stud (see Appendix Bfor analysis worksheets) - Allexcept, for three of .the intersections,,Ppqrate above .capacity for the existing lane with c q1p .Fation .1 the existing signal phasing�.nd tuning plan. The intersections. of SE 2 Street/Biscayne Boulevard,,. SE 2 Street/SE 2 Avenue ..... .. andthe.1-95 ramp/SE. 3, Street/SE 2 AVenue operate under the acceptable LOS. Exhibit 5 Existing (2000) Intersection Capacity Analysis Results Weekday PM - Peak. Hour.Conditions Intersection Existing LOS 1. Biscayne Boulevard] Chopin Plaza B, 2. SE 2 Street / Biscayne Boulevard B 3. SE 2 Street /SE 2 Avenue F 4. SE 2 Street /SE 3 Avenue, D 5. 1-95 Ramps / SE 3 Street /SE 2 Avenue T 6. SE 3 Street /SE 3 Avenue C 7. SE 3 Street / Biscayne Boulevard B 8. SE 4 Street /SE 2 Avenue F 9. SE 4 Street /SE 3 Avenue t A 10. Biscayne Boulevard/Main Driveway 14/A 11. 'Biscayne Boulevard/Express Driveway N/A Source: UFA Submitted into the public record in connection with -tam Walter Foernan 00 One Miami MUSK rrafflic brtpact SI! dy .�� 3�:0 PLANAI=ED AND PROGRAMMED .-;,R(OADWAY. I:MPROVEM ENTS The 2000:-Miami=Dade -County. Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), the 2015 Metro -Dade Tran4gortation Plan Long Range Element, as well as projects identified by the Miami Downtown Development Authority (DDA), were reviewed to -identify any programmed or planned projects within the limits of the study area established for this atfdy.,�These documents, show no officially programmed or planned improvements withnthe study:area although,there are planned -roadway and transit improvements in the surrounding area. Also, the DDA and other groups downtown:have..formulated several unfunded transportatiom improvement proposals for the downtown core and the extended downtown to the north and south. S 10 Submitted into the public record in connection with _ UPm an !.2- /4(- 00 Walter Foeman o _ i 1 ' size and trip generation for the PM -peak hour. Traffic generated by these developments was distributed using the Cardinal Distributions obtained from the Metro -Dade Transportation Plan: Long Range Element to the Year 2015. The appropriate cardinal distribution for these developments, along with the corresponding Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZ) are shown in Exhibit 7. Submitted into the public record in connection vvith Walter Foeman 4 _ 1 Onchfiami MUSP Tialric [-pact Study Committe I:Developments PM Peak Hour Trip Generation :Project,. ., _: -Location .,,.:.. P M;Peak:Fiour Vehicle,Trips Name & TAZ Land Use Designation Number In Out Total Address of Units The Yacht 667 1111 S High Rise Apt/Condo 355 DUS 29 19 48 Club at Bayshore Dr Office 8,500 SF 1 4 5 Brickell.: Quality Restaurant( 4,000 SF - 30 23 ... 53 ` V 667. Marriott Brickell Hotel 302 Rooms 24 37 61 Hotel Avenue Brickell 667 4 of S'' ' `High Rise Condo- ' • •639 DUS -. Bay Plaza Bayshore Dr ` -Quality: Restaurart (2), ; = : - 7,452`SF 52 35 87 between 12 Retail 5,149 SF St and 12 Terr Bayshore 667 E of S High Rise Apt/Condo 749 DUs Palms Bayshore Dr Quality Restaurant() ; .. 7,35.7 SF _61 41 ----402 between 14 Retail(2) 9,500 SF St and 12St One 668 Tequesta Brickell Key High Rise ApdCondo ' 288 DUs — ----- 24 16 39 Point Two 668 Tequesta Brickell Key High Rise Apt/Condo , 268 DUs 22 15 37 Point Three 668 Tequesta Brickell Key High Rise Apt/Condo 234 DUs 19 13 32 Point Mandarin 668 Hotel Briciell Key Hotel 329 Rooms 27 40 66 Courvoiser 668 Courts Brickell Key High Rise Apt/Condo 272 DUs 22 15 37 Brickell on Hotel 325 Rooms 26 39 66 the River 675 27 SE 5 St High Rise Apt/Condo 614 DUs 40 33 84 Office 17,426 SF 2 Q 11 A 78 81 160 t'wSource: Independent Traffic Study. _ (2) Ancillary retail, trips not generated separately. Submitted into the public record in connection with UQM Walter Foernan 00 — (l+tf �1.7Fr 1005 Stage) --675 Distribution TAZ 675 - NNE 12.25% S 5?9% 15.02% ENE 4.56% 4 7f8% 582% ESE 0.79% 1:80% SSE = 1:04% 089% :_` 415% SSW 10:93% ` 8 50% 8.56% WSW 24 88% 24"13%0 .' 23.42% WNW 20.37% 18.08% NNW 25.18% 23.15% Total 100% 1000/ V _ 100% Source: Metro -Dade Long Range Transportation Plan VRddte. . The Cardinal Distribution gives a generalized distribution of trips froma TAZ to other parts of Miami -Dade County. For estimating trip distribution for committed projects, consideration was:,given to conditions such as the roadway network 'accessed by the project, roadways available to travel in the desired direction, and attractiveness of traveling on a specific roadway. 'Future traffic volumes were projected for the buildout - year 2003. Future (2003) projected turning movement volumes and roadway link volumes without. the project are shown in Exhibit 8. Submitted into the public record in connection With item /i /!Y�Od Waiter Forman -Pa" I ❑D� ❑D; 2,058 I-- — -- — -- — -- j i l Q D FIRST I 1 UNION BUILDING j bAb , � I I S.E. 3 ST Qc — — — — — — _ _ 4O 7 i4O 40 — — — In j W i C j I po '` ¢¢N 1, ti SE 4 ST DISC. DLVD. WAY , B — — t S00 40. RD 36 ,%CD 0 CD At N DUPONT PLAZA HOTEL u1: I �--lWAMI RIVER W DAVID PLUWkR 8 ASSOCIATES,(NC. ONE MIAMI ripm IRINSPO(IIaf10H • CIYII S/RUCIUR I[ • [NYIRO/u(NI CAI IC f7 7f?! 1'f IR .1i of T T1 FUTURE PM PEAK HOUR 11 One Mant( MUSP Tra>Te jWgct Sh&6 4.3 -PROJECT TRAFFIC `- 4:3. .-Project Trip, -Generation y .. Trip°generation for th6lproject_was,estimated using-the.:rates published'in Attachrnent:D-2::Downtown Miam ,:DRI Facilities .Trip Generation .Analysis -in the Notification of Troposed-Change . (NOPC)Jo: the Downtown Eami: DRI,.:submitted-to the South Florida Regional,Planning-Council .on September; 1994 (See Appendix A): The vehicular-directiQnal split_(in/out) was,estimate& based on= the.percentages-published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers ;(ITE), Trip 6erleratio iSixth Edition,. for'similar.,land;uses.. A, trip generatiod:summary for. the,proj ect -for a -weekday. PM peak hour is provided in Exhibit 9._ _.. Exhibit 9 Project Trip Generation`([) PM Peak Hour Land Use Designation Number of Units Rate per Unit PM Peak Hour Vehicle Trips (2) '' In 7 Out Total High Rise ApOCondo 425 DUs 0.1360563 35 23 58 Office(3) ' 707,025 SF '0,0005985 72 351 423 Total. 107 374 481 (1) Based on rates published in Attachment U-Z: Downtown Miami Dltt facilities Trip Generation Analysis in the Notitication of Proposed Change (NOPC) to the Downtown Miami DRI, submitted to the South Florida Regional Planning Council on September, 1994. (2) The entrance/exitsplit was based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Trio Generation, 6th Edition, 1998. (3) Includes ancillary retail space. 4.3.2 Project Trip Assignment As established in the One Miami Master Traffic Study (September 8, 1998), pijoject traffic was distributed and assigned to the study area using the average Cardinal Distribution for TAZ 664 and 665 shown in Exhibit 10. The Cardinal Distribution gives a generalized distribution of trips from a TAZ to other parts of Miami -Dade County. Submitted into the public record in connection with item on l'-2-/Y0e Waiter Foeman 00-1 One Miami MUSP Traffic Impact Study For estimating trip distribution for the project location, consideration was given to conditions such as the roadway network accessed by the project, roadways available to travel in the desired direction, and attractiveness of traveling on a specific roadway. Exhibit 11 shows the project trip assignment to the impacted roadway segments and intersections. Exhibit 10 Cardinal Distribution (2005 Stage) TAZ 664 & 665 Cardinal Direction Distribution NNE 11.86% ENE 6.14% ESE 0.96% SSE 1.50% SSW 12.24% WSW 25.86% WNW - ._ 20.40% 1.08° Total 100.00% _ Source: Metro -Dade Lone Ranee Transoortation_Plan Update. 1. _ Submitted into the public record in connection with item Z—_�L on — /4(, Oc waiter �-oeman Q _ ('j�..r 4,ar`t I t N _I !I OD i I �{ i 35 4 i'00 cr ff S.E. 2 ST. BAYFRONT PARK OD -� -- 41 247 - — T. OD 289 ;. - ......... CHOPIN PLAZA I i I I I tt•r ► .-------- — — — — -- 0/ N.T.S. , m,,, ml� U., t `� In FIRST NTERCONTIN NTAL BUILDING OFFIGE INTERCONTINENTAL HOTEL ttt $ l I s r: PAP BISC. BLVD. WAY BISCAYNE BAY DUPONT PLAZA HOTEL i LEGEND A ONE MIAMI DESIG ATIPR JECT PARCEL 250-► - HOURLY VOLUME dp -SIGNAL -�MIAMI RIVER - v DAV I D PLUMNER a ASSOC I ATES, I NC. ONE MIAMI svalullan CIVILsreununa •rsa'syaechMu MIJSP TRAFFIC IMPA('T STI If1Y 111 [0•., [.Btft IMf u.l.) r--- PRO.IFCTTRAFFIr ASSirrWArn'T One Miami MUSP Trade Impact Study 4.4 FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS WITH PROJECT Using the trip assignments from the previous sections, the project trips, background growth and committed development trips were combined with the adjusted 2000 existing traffic to get the total 2003 traffic on the impacted roadway segments. Exhibit 12 shows the total PM peak hour traffic volumes at the roadway links and intersections under study; Exhibit 13 shows the resulting LOS at the intersections under study. Intersection capacity analysis worksheets are provided in Appendix B. Exhibit 13 Future Intersection Capacity Analysis Results with Project Weekday PM Peak Hour Conditions Intersection -_ - - LOS LOS with Improvements 1. Biscayne Boulevard / Chopin Plaza B NA 2. SE 2 Street / Biscayne Boulevard C 3. SE 2 Street /SE 2 Avenue F B 4. SE 2 Street /SE 3 Avenue E NA 5. I-95 Ramps / SE 3 Street /SE 2 Avenue F E 6. SE 3 Street /SE 3 Avenue C NA 7. SE 3.Street/ Biscayne Boulevard D NA 8. SE 4 Street /SE 2 Avenue F D 9• SE 4 Street /SE 3 Avenue A NA 10. Biscayne Boulevard/Main Driveway NA 11. Biscayne Boulevard/Express Driveway(') B NA vvuaw. a�a Note: (1)NA: Not Applicable t21 Unsignalized Submitted into the public record in connection veith Walter Foeman — 0_7 0 Q 1-..-..-..-..-..-..-..-.....-J/ OD — 2, 346 •� i i i i FIRST UNION I I I BUILDING j S.E. 3 ST t I -- — — -- — — .■ m►ii ter)) . � 0 r— — — — — — — 0-----------------•— i -----------� I. -• i t t � ., Cn I > I I I MI I z1 }. tit I m SE 4 SI RISC. BLVD. WAY z ..—..--.—..----..—..—..I 1,207 dOV , I --- 107 ------------------- r, cn ry I DUPONT PLAZA HOTEL `�MIAMI RIVER BAYFRONT PARK 0 v OD 42 F_7 CHOPIN PLAZA ---- — -- — �� OFFICE, r Lwty 1 C� BISCAYNE BAY INTERCONTINENTAL HOTEL LEGEND A- ONE MIAMI PROJECT PARCEL DESIGNATION 250-- -HOURLY VOLUME dp -SIGNAL V DAVID PLU%kR 8 ASSOCIATES, INC. I �" ONE MIAMI TRANSPORTATION ( CIVIL • SIRYCIVH.I NEST PALM MUSP TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY Via.t cAeLys gat r.Ees .cs� rkM xuu am FUTURE PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES WITH PRO.IFrT ~1') 0, • One Miami MUSP Traffic Impact Study - - t It is anticipated -that delays will be experienced by traffic at the -intersections of SE 2 Street/Biscayne f Boulevard, SE 2 Street/SE 2 Avenue, I-95 ramp/SE 3VStreet/SE 2 Avenue, and SE 4 Street/SE 2 Avenue r. with the exis n9)s_9i al phasi ? and timing:,. Si 'al were tested to establish if operations could be improved -to -meet -future traffic demand, giventhe existing lane configurations. Signal re -timing .:'.:would provide the required capacity to .:serve future'- traffic demand at the intersections of SE 2 � _StreetlBiscayne Boulevard, SE 3 Street/SE 2 Avenue, and SE 4 Street/SE 2 Avenue. In order to meet future traffic demands, it is recommended that a -traffic `signal be installed at the main driveway to One Miami on Biscayne Boulevard and lane reconfiguration at SE 2=Street/SE 2 Avenue. The afternoon peak hour express exit :operates above capacity as a stop condition. Ilitersection capacity analysis for these intersections was performed with the recommended signal timing adjustments (worksheets are included in Appendix B). The results of thii analysis are also shown on Exhibit-iI . Roadway link analysis was performed for future traffic conditions with the project. The resulting roadway link analysis is presented in Exhibit .14. All roadway,links analyzed are projected to operate above the established LOS E threshold. Exhibit 14 Future Roadway Capacity Analysis with Project Weekday PM Peak Hour Conditions Peak Direction Roadway Limits Direction Number of Volume Service LOS Lanes Volume (LOS E) Biscayne North of NB 4LD 1,455 C Boulevard SE 2 Street SB 4LD 1,423 -- 3,140 C Brickell South of NB 2LD 1,355 C Avenue SE 4 Street SB 3LD , 1,724 2,560 C SE 2 Avenue just north of 2 Street SB 3L One-way 762 3,170 C SE 2 Street just west of SE 2 Ave WB 2L One-way 545 2,100 C SE 3 Street just west of SE 2 Ave EB 2LD 966 1,750 C WB 2LD 1,709 D �'' Source: Generalized Peak Hour Peak Directional Volumes, FDOT's 1998 :SOS Manual. Submitted into the public Page 20 item on —/Y—oa • Walter Foeman 0 0 —11 3 7 An assessment of the'fivi peak hour traffic associated'with'ile development of Parcel A, increment one of One Miarri ,Vas'perforii in accvrdaiice With`therequireinents-of the Downtown Miami DRI Development Order. Analysis of future (2003) traffic conditions With the projects during PM peaktour shows that the "Dotivntown Miami DRI's adopted Level of Service E standard will not be exceeded with the lane reco ;figuration and signal tirriing adjustments at SE 2 Street/SE 2 Avenue in addition to signal timing adjustments at the intersections of SE 2 Street/Biscayne Boulevard, SE 3 Street/SE 2 Avenue, and SE 4 Street/SE 2 Avenue. Adequate capacity during theTM peak hour is available to accommodate the proposed project trips within the. study area at the remaining intersections and on the roadway segments. The proposed One Miami project will comply with the -requirements of the Downtown Miami DR[ and pay Proportional Share Fees which may be used by the city for transportation improvements in the area. A 10 t Submitted into the public Page 21 item 2LL on Walter Foeman 00-1137 co cn o ccr a 3. co 1 n. �o 5, > > o ,7CT -* 0 1 l a a 3 n •----•• --•.. 56"1a tlw r-4 .............. (►.rJ...) .�.�.uw w•In�ly In1..tr1.1 INIIUIIIMI All►Ktlw� '; 1 1. McrultM 't jl •1 (WN.t) Ii LO44it11 LQ44ilt O.t02 ': O�It14111 Lllfollf LOoeW 1IOUf 1 SWIMS ::I ... arfla e.pe4e19 1.1001 1.It)1 LOOSI 1.00{{ f.t100 4.1m 1./111 l.ult/3w.la e.e0gle 6.ws LOW LHIIS LOU& MUG Il.t.l (Hr n.a e.1e1 IS7.SIM IIl.t100 t.0000 t.{S{I 1,I)Idtt1 1.W.Rq .IlLc1At fl.11tl m It { Iullr►ttal (Ov I.r.) Lim" MUM 7St.iS01 IRIS 1.0000 1 Iq Rp' t�rrtlr I.IOItILim I.ItW LOWIOd01 i.: t.0000 �:t/l1 I.OISI I.Ilt/ T .. IMiK.tyldwlrl.l i.loluu Lt2u 1.2111 I0007 Mate i.um 1.1001 trtltrl.wt LNII)1 Lifts t.SW 1.1015 1.10!) 11.110 /.Ttt1 (W ewe Leo11W LU» 3.1W SAIK IU1t 1L11te Il.IHI „j 1:11f) t.loeo M I&I ►641111lu. I.000St11 L4s�4 Lui ! 9144ij �MM 4 teAele ter ealalulea yp • �><el+ge na : '." it ad 7 rw ►eN'efe41 tm ft" of HI hat kw tatwul wtK wide 1►(j'tws /f "it it led is W1611 t►M tM MrMW /tW A." . j Submitted into the public record in connection .with • item Z—S on /Y-Oe Walter Foerpian ®l' - 3 L J • HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.1c Inter: Chopin Dr. and Biscayne Blvd. City/St: Miami, FL Proj-#. 00124 Date Period: 2000 PM Peak Hour Chapin Dr. NIS, St: Biscayne Blvd. -SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY "Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound 'T R L T R 'L T R L T R No Lanes .0 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 2 0 0 LGConf ig R T L Volume 41 1229 39 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0. RTOR Vol 4 Duration 1.00 Area Type: CBD or Similar Signal erations— Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 .5 6 7 a EB Left NB Left Thru Thru P Right Right Peds Peds .WB Left SB Left P Thru Thru Right Right Peds Peds NB Right ES Right SE Right WS Right P Green 65.0 24.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 All Red 2.0 1.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Apprr- Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity . (s) v/C g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound Westbound 30.7 C R 308 1282 0.13 0.240 30.7 C Northbound T 2975 4577 0.45 0.650 9.1, A 9..1 A.. Southbound L 742 3090 0.06 0.240.. 29.4 C 29.4 C Intersection Delay = 10.4 (sec/veh) Intersectidn LOS = B Submitted into, the public record in connection with item on F Walteroem. an 0-1137, KCS 'ze 'Intdksections Release '3.'lc E `-2 "S `i Inter:treet .'in -Biscayne--B 'City./St: Mi-amli, 'FL _Analyst �- I.P: 40124 24 !b6t6: `•o 1 0 ;Period:. Z000 PM °Peak . Hour tl,W t,: "SE '2 `g-itt aiscay-me-'Blvd. ED JiXTtASECTION SUMMARY- Eastbound'Westbound v 1Northboun'd Southbound L T 'R `L T 'R L T R =No. �Lkne�s .0 io .0 .0 .0 0 -0 "2 0 0 L 11� R VOTucrie : 363 —, 1341 -tine Vi th 11.0 11.0 RTOR Vol 0 ............ ------- 'Duration 1.00 Area Type.,-. CBD '.Simi 1 ar .-or Operations - 'Phase `Combination --Signal_ -1 -2 -3 4 5 6 7 Es 1wft NB I;e f t P Thru ru Right _Th Right Peds 'Peds WB Left 'S'B tef t Thru Thru Right Right P Peds Peds 14B Right ES Right SB Right WB Right Green 71.0 i1.0 Yellow - 4.0 4.0 All Red 2. . 0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Int'ersection Performance Summary - Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Rati os L ane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity '(s) V/c g/t Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound Westbound Northbound L 461 2710 0.86 0.170 61.9 E 61.9 E Southbound R 2562 3637 0.56 0.710 7.9 A 7.9 A Intersection Delay = 19.4 (sec/veh) Intersecti6n Los B I Submitted into the public record in connection veith item on 1-2-11-(-041 Walter Foeman Oiflf 00-1137 ,'HCS: 'S gnaliz'ed Int'ersections``Rehease`3':lc, inter: SE-2 'Street ands=SE .2 Avenue City/St :-riiaini, FL "Analyst�'PAProj # Q0124,, Date: 07 Ij%12y; 00 jeriod 2000,PM Peak'Hour "E{/W--St: SE 2`'Street NJS"St:" bE e 2'Av}nue NTERSECTI N,SUNQIAR�' N, _ • -'SIGNALIZED .I • Eastiiound 'westbo n Northbound SouGhbound L T R L T R "'L 'T R -L T R No. Lanes `0 0 0 `1 ~2 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 hGConf ig L LT T R `volume , 12244 341 457 95 Lane Width; 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0. "RTOR Veil 29 Duration 1_1 %;00 '"Area 'Type.. `_CBD:-or 'similar - - Signal O erat "ions -• -• --.. _... _ Phase' -Combination l 2 3 4 S 6 7 8 -EB _Left NB `Left Thru Thru Right Right Peds `Peds X VS Left P SB Left ' Thru P Thru P Right .Right P Peds X 'Peds NS sight EB -.Right -SB =Right WB Right Green 54.0 Yellow 4.0 -4' : 0 All Red 1.0 1.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary--- Appr Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOT -Delay LOS Eastbound Westbound L 832 1:540 1.18 0.540 367.4 F LT 1027 1902 1.61 0.540 Northbound - Southbound T 828 2301 0.56 0.360 28.5 C 27.6 C R 496 1377 0.16 0.360 22.4 C Intersection Delay = (sec/veh) Intersection Los = i Submitted into the public record in connection with item on—lY--oa Walter Foernan 00 _ 113'7 0i+,%, r.L'Ir!� , HCS: Signalized Intersections Release'3.1c Inter: SE,2 Street and SE 3 Avenue City/St: Miami, FL Analyst.- DPA Proj -# : 00124 •Date: 07/12/00 Period: 2000 PM Peak Hour E/W St: SE 2 Street -NIS St: SE 3 Avenue No. Lanes LGConf ig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound.' Sou L T. R L T R L T R L T R, 0 0 0 0 5 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 TR L LT 1963 82 1742 247 11.0 11.0 11.0 8 Duration 1.00 Area Type: CBD or Similar Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6_ 7 8 EB Left NB Left P Thru Thru P Right Right Peds Peds WB Left SB Left Thru P Thru Right P Right Peds Peds NB Right ES Right SB Right WB Right Green 52.0 40.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 All Red 0.0 0.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Ap?roach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay L05- Delay LOS Eastbound Westbound TR 2933 5641 0.82 0.520 22.7 C 22.7 C Northbound L 616 1540 0.57 0.400 .27.1 C LT 816 2041 1..00 0.400 91.9 F 72.4 E Southbound Intersection Delay = 39.0 (sec/veh) Intersectibn LOS - D 10 Submitted into the public record in connection vvith item Z-25' on—AY--oo Walter Foeman 0 0 _ 113 7 Movements: " -------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------- Flow: Lane -width' - Walk speed:, % Blockage: Median Type: None # of vehicles: 0 Flared approach Movements: # of vehicles: Eastbound 0 . # of vehicles: westbound 0, Lane usage for movements 1,2&3 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- N Y N N N N N N N Channelized: N Grade: r 0.00 Lane usage for movements 4, 5&6 approach: Submitted into the public Lane 1 LanFe&rd In connection wjtt" ane 3 L T R L T item on--1'(-01? R Walter Foe€nan ®O —1 3 l Cf P r`o z7. ..N _. ... _;N N. _ N-:.... ..... ...N .. .. _ N...._. N.. N Channelized:" N Grade ,.�:p .. .;ealr u, Lane usage for movements 7,.-8&9 approach b Lane 3 .. L T R 3.. L ;_,_ T R L ;; T R NI N -.Chanrielized: N Grade_:.. 0 . 00 ```Lane usage for movements 10,11&12 approach: Lane 1 -Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T;__ . R L T R Y N N Y = Y`_ N N N N Channelized: N .Grade" 0.00 Data for -Computing Effect of .Delay to-major.Street-Vehicles: ---------------------------------- ------------�---------- - - - - ---- - - - - -- - Northbound Southbou, Shared In volume, major th vehicles: 0 0 Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: 0 0 Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: 1700 1700 Sat flow rate, _major rt vehicles:. 1700 1700 Number of major street through lanes: 1 0 Length of study period, hrs: 1.00 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Worksheet 4 Critical Gap and Follow-up time calculation. Critical Gap Calculations: Movement 10 11 t c,hv 1.0 1.0 P by 0.0210.02 t c,g 0.2 0.2 G 0.00 0.0 Submitted into the public t 3 , It 0.7 0.0 C c,T: record in connection with 1 stage 0.00 •0.00 item Z�� On Walter Foeman ry tl 113 l ---------- - v ( h) y P,, C m (vPh)_ 35 295 - 726. 651 . ,,95.u . quee ..length 0.05 0.45 >,.. °Control `Delay _ LOS 10.2, 15.1 B C Approach LOS 14.6 --------------- Iwo— Submitted into the public - record in connection with item on Wafter f=oernan Q 1 3 , . ,HCS:-Signakkzedizntersecti©ns Releaae 3.1c '..Inter: `SE ';4 .`Street :and `SE .2 Avenue Zkt�y, /St : -,Miami., =FL -And1yst:• DPA 'Prof s'#•: 06124, ,:Date: :period: '2'060"='PM 'Peak Hour `E%.W St: 'SE - 4 :Street -N%S '$t: `SE `2 AVehue SIGNALIZED AiTERS£CTIOrT `SUMMARY Sastbound Westbound !Northboun3 Southbound ,L T :R ,L '-T 'R 'I -T R L T R No. 'Lanes t0 [0 ;0 0_ :0 A 2 2 3 D LGQonf g R' L T Volume .1462 246 1254 .Lune Vi th 11.0 11.0 11.0 RTOR 'Vol 0 Duration 2-.'90 Area :Type:: "CBD ror Similar Signal` eratons Phase Combination '1 '2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left NB Left Thru Thru Right 'tight P Peds Peds WS Left SS Left P Thru Thru P P Right Right Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SE Right_ WB Right Green 68.0 22'.0 r' Yellow . 4.0 4.0 ' All Red 1..0 1.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound Westbound Northbound R 1499 2204s 1.07. Southbound L 643 2925 0.42 T 4203 4424 0.33 Intersection Delay =-82.9 161.E, F 0.680 161.6 F 0.220 35.5 _D 0.950 0.4. A 6.1 A. (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = F Submitted into the public record in connection veith item 2— on Walter FPernan V ". " 1 3 [ • • HCS:.•: Signali°zed Intersections. Release; :3.lc , Inter: SE 4 .Street .and,,SE,°_,3 Avenue:.:. City-./-Sts Miami,- FL---: Analyst: DPA- Proj # 00124.= Date: 07/i_2/00•;,- Period ,'.2000 PM_,_}Peak,°Hour E/- St: SE-.4 :Streiet. N/S. St::;SE,3 Avenue,io S I.GNALI ZED°,.,INT-ER$_ £CTdON _,SUMMARY Eastbound,.: - ^ Westbound Northbound.,. --Sout°hbound .,: T; R-. L- T R:_ L T:; R°.: L:: T°: R No. Lanes- 0 0 0 2 :. , 2 ; . 0 �.. ... T,,-,2 0 :, 0 •. 0 0 " LGConf ig:.. L T& TR volume. 573 1004, 35- : 22 9 Lane: Width ; 12.0 12,.0 , 12.0 RTOR.VoI. 0 0 Duration.. 1-.00- Area. -Type. -All other;. areas Signal O era tons , Phase Combination..1 2 3'-::. 4 _ 5 _ 6 :. 7 .° 8 ; ES ' Lef-t- - P NB Left Thru ... P .Thru_, , _ P Right; P Right. , �- P Peds . Peds-._- WB. Left ; SB_ Left Thrii ' Thru. . Right... Right-. Peds- . Peds- ; . NB Right. EB Right .. SS Right. WB Right Green 79.0 13-0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 All Red 0.0 1 0.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance -Summary-. Appr,/,-. Lane _. Adj Sat_° Ratios.,Lane Group Approach - Lane Group Flow Rate - • Grp., Capacity (s)_ v/c g/C Delay .LOS.-_ Delay.LOS.-. Eastbound L 2767 3502 0.22 0.790 2.8 A TR 2838 3592. 0.39. 0.790 3.6 A .- 3.3-. A westbound - Northbound TR 450 3458 0.07 0.130 38.5 D 38.5 D Southbound Intersection Delay = 4.0 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = A Submittedinto the public record in connection with item -on Waiter Foeman . Oity Ci_orl, W 1137 10 Submitted into the public record in connection vvith item on —/Yoe Walter Foeman U 0 _ -1 13 7 Inter: ,,,Chopin.,,Dr.,,-, and;;Biscayne Blvd City/St: Miami, FL .�_ .q� _,.. je ., Andlysti DPA p.- -.-,Praj #: 00124 Date _C0 7 / i2-/,b 0 Peri6d':' PM Peak Hour w/o project NIS St: Biscayne Blvd. SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound westbound Northbound Southbound L -T R,;i- 1•L R:::T R L T R No. Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 2 0 0 LGC6nflg t,.R T L volume 42 1316 40 Lane width.. z12.0 12.0 12.0 RTO I R VO 4 Duration-.r 1.00 2,-Area Type: CBD:or Similar ,Signal-, . erations Phase' -Combination 1,, 2 -3 14. 5 6 7 EB Left NB Left -Thru Thru P Right Right Peds Peds WB Left SB Left P Thru Thru Right Right 'Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right P Green 65.0 24.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 All Red 2.0 1.0 Cycle -Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj. Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate . . %, Grp Capacity (s) VIC g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound westbound 30.7 'C R 308 1282 0.13 0.240 30.7 C Northbound T 2975 4577 0.48 0.650 9.5 A 9.5 A I Southbound L 742 3090. 0.06 0.240 29.4 C 29.4 C Intersection Delay 10.6 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B F, Submitted into the public record in Connection veith item X-1' on -1-2-1cf-Ed' Walter Foeman Div 00-1137 HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.1c IntgF: SE 2„Street, and Biscayne Blvd. City/St: Miami, FL Analyst:.DPA Proj #: 00124 Date: 07/10/00 Period: PM Peak Hour w/o project E/W St: SE 2 Street N/S St: Biscayne Blvd. =' SIGNALIZED IN'PERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound = Westbound 'Northbound Southbound`'-" L T R L T! R L;` T 4R L .:, T R No. Lanes 2 0 0 0 0 3. 0 0 0 0 0 0 LGCorif ig ;.., _ L R volume 391 1401 Lane . Width 11.0 11.0 RTOR'Vol` 0 Duration 1.00 Area Type: CBD or Similar Signal O erations Phase Co::bination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB ,,Left= ::.•. ... ... NB,-Let't " P Thru Thru:. Right Right Peds Peds WB Left SB Left - Thru Thru Right Right P , Peds Peds NB'., Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 71.0 17.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 All Red 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0. secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound Westbound Northbound L 461 2710 0..92 0.170 77.4 E 77.4 E Southbound 8.2 A R 2582 3637 0.59 0.710 8.2 A Intersection Delay = 23.3 (sec/veh) Intersectioh LOS - C 10 Submitted into the public record in connection with item on Walter Foeman 0 0_ 1 1 3 7 HCS,: Signalized Intersections Release 3.1c Inter: SE 2 -Street-,and SE 2.Avenue City/St: Miami, FL AnAlyst�; "":DPX - 1, C2,!:�. _.. i. m _,._ t , . Proj #: 00124 Date :;_.,7,"I., 7./10/00 Period: PM. Peak Hour w/o project .E/W St: SE2 Street n N S St. SE 2,Avenue. SIGNALJ. -'�ZLLj INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound,-, ;Westbound Northbound Southbound L T '-R L T R L T R L T R No.i. Uines -0 0 a 0 0 0 0 1,- 2. 0 0 2 1 LGConfig .L _,LT T Volume 2348 351 508 98 Lane Width 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 RTOR:Vol 19 Duration Area Type: CBD or Similar . . .11 :_* -.7 _'.. signal 0 erations Phase Combination 1 2� -3 4 5 6 -7 8 EB Left NB Left Thru Thru. 'Right Right Peds- Peds x WB Left P SB Left Thru P Thru P Right Right P .-Peds., X Peds NB Right EB .—Right SB Right WB Right Green 64.0 26.0 Yellow. 4_0 4.0 All Red 1.0 1.0 Cycle Length: 100._0 secs _r/ Intersection Performance Summary Kp p Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate • Grp Capacity VTC—g I C Delay LOS Delay.LOS Eastbound Westbound L 986 1540 1.04 0.640 129.2 F LT 1217 1902 1.42 0.640 772.9 F 532.1' F Northbound Southbound T 598 2301 0.87 0.260 53.5 D 50'.4 D R 358 1377 0.23 0.260 30.6 C Intersection Delay = 446.1 (sec/Veh) Intersection LOS = F I Submitted into the public record in connection with item on _L2-14f-Od Walter Fo8man 00_1137 HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.1c Inter:.. .SE 2 Street. and SE 3 Avenue City/St: Miami, FL Arialy.tt DPA Proj #: 00124 ,Date: 07/11/Ob Period: PM Peak Hour w/o project E/W St: SE 2 Street NIS St: SE'3 Avenue -SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound -Northbound Southbound' L T R L T R L T `R L T R No. Lanes.' 0 0 0 0 5 0 1, 2 0 0_ 0 0 LGConf ig TR L IT Volume 2058 84 764 254 Lane Width ,,,. 11.0 11.0 11.0 RTOR Vol 8 Duration 1.00 Area Type: CBD or Similar Signal Operations Fhase Combination 1 .2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left _. N3- Lef.C•-= P Thru Thru : _ P Right Right Peds Peds WE Left SB -Left - Thru P Thru Right -P Right Peds Peds NS Right EB Right. SS Right WE Right Green 52.0 40.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 All Red 0.0 0.0 Cycle Length::100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr LaneAdj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate t. . Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS -Delay-LOS _ Eastbound Westbound TR 2934 5642 Northbound L 616 1540 LT 816 2041. t Southbound 0.86 0.520 24.3 C 24.3 ' C 0.58 0.400 27.6 C 1.03 0.400 122.6 F 94.0 F. Intersection Delay = 46.9 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS ='D t Submitted into, the public record in connection with item Z—S on —/v--od Walter Foeman 00-1137 HCSp Signalized Intersections Release 3.1c Inter: SE 3 Street and SE 2 Avenue City/St: Miami,'FL Anaiyst.:DPA ..Pro #: 00124 " Date: OT)11`f OD ` Period: PM Peak Hour w/o project E/W St 'SE' 3l Street . NIS St: SE 2 Avenue =, SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound. --L T R I L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 -0 3 0 LGConfig T R TR Volume 367 422 1354 1646 Lane Width 11.0-11.0. 11.0 RTOR Vol 150 1050 Duration 1.00 Area Type: CBD or Similar Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left NB Left Thru P Thru Right P Right Peds Peds. WB Left SB Left Thru Thru P Right Right P Peds Peds NB Right ES Right. SB Right WS -Right _ Green 32.0 60.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 ... •. All Red 0.0 0.0 `• Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate '' Grp Capacity ('s) v c g/C :. Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound T. 519 1621 .0.75 0.320 40.7 D 36.8 D R 547 1708 0.53 0.320, 31.5 C Westbound Submitted into the public record in connection v,..,ith item 2.,5 one Walter i=deman 0 _ 1 1 3 7 'HCS �Signdli-zed .Intersections .Release "3 .=1c ',Inter: 'SE'',3'-Street %and 'SE:3 'Avenue Ci.Gyjs.t: "Miami, =E.L �Aiial:ystflPA P.ro3 #: ,O0124 -Date : 07/1'2/0'0 Period: PM ,.Feak =Hour ;w/o Yproj.ect E%W ^St : =SE =3 ~Street ;-V S S.t :.FSE :3 ,Avenue SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION;S.(3MKA! RY °Eastbound Mestbouhd Northbound SouthbQ,urrd �L !T 'R. _L 'T '.R L T r:-R L _T >R No. Lanes '10 :'1 0 0 ::1 ;p ;0 n3 0 0 :0 _.0 hGGonfg LT LT TR '.Volume 36 56 117 232 796 7.9 -Lane%'Width; 11.0 11.0 11.01 ,ATOR',: Vol 5urat2on IV 00 -Area ",.Type: -A11=-otheri.areas :.Signal•:Operations Phase Combination':1 2 _.3 4 `EB Left P .-NB :.Left Thru P Thru P Right Right -P Peds Peds .WE Left P _:SB 'Left Thru P Thru Right Right Peds -=Peds ,: "NB -Right .Es.Right SB - -Right ' WB ^Right Green 11:0 41.0 ... 36 O ,.Yellow 4.0 4.0 `4.0 -All Red 0.0 0 0 0:0 Cycle -Length: 100.0 secs" Intersection' Performance -Summary Appr/ .Lane -Adj.-Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane -Group Flow 'Rate _ Grp Capacity (s) v/c __g/C .DelayLOS -Delay LOS Eastbound LT 198 1802• 0.51 0.110. 51.1-. D 51.1, D.. Westbound LT 740 1806 0.51 0.410 24.6 C 24.6' C Northbound TR 1781 4946 0.53 0.360 26.5_ C 26.5 C Southbound Intersection Delay 27.7 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C Submitted into the public record in connection veith item on—/V--Oe -Walter Foeman ®O " -1 1 / ry Flared approach Movements: # of vehicles: Eastbound 0 # of vehicles: Westbound„ 0 Lane usage for movements 1,2&3 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- N X N N N N N N. N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 - Lane usage for movements 4, 5&6 approach: Sulicmitted into the ub Lane 1 Lane Lane 3 L T R L T record -pin cOnnestion veithT R item r� on,, —/Y--oa Waiter Foeman O L!'1 3 7 ------------------- * --------------------------- 0 ----------------------------- N N N IN N 'N N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 7,8&9 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R ----------------------------------------------------.------------------------------ N' N N N N N N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 10,11&12 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Y N N Y Y N N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 /7 Data for Computing Effect of Delay, to Major Street Vehicles: I- ------------------------------ Northbound Southboun Shared In volume, major th vehicles: 0 0 Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: 0 0 Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: 1700 1700 Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: 1700 1700 Number of major street through lanes: 1., 0 Length of study period, hrs: 1.00 Worksheet 4 Critical Gap and Follow-up time calculation. Critical Gap Calculations: Movement 10 11 -----------------------------------------------r----------------------- t c,base 7.1 6.5 t c,hv i 1.0 1.0 P by 0.02 0.02 t c,g 0.2 0.2 G 0.00 ' 0.00 Submitted into the public t 3, It 0.7 0.0 t c, T: record in connection with 1 stage 0.00 0.00 item Z'' on —/Y-oa Walter Foeman 0 0 -113 7 i stage 4 6.5 _ �'o1=low U Time Calcuhations - p - f 10 11 :'Movement:. --.---.----,----------------------------------- --_------------------------------- t f,base 3.5 4.0 _. P by 0. 02 0, 02 t f _ ... 3 ,5 _... 4_. 0- ,- - .. _.. -----------=----------- - ---- ------------------------------------ Worksheet 6 Impedance And capacity�equations' ;St-ep . 3 : TH -from Mi'ror St Conflicting Flows 271 Potential Capacity 636 Pedestrian Impedance Factor - 1.00 Cap: Adj. factor due to Impeding;mvmnE`'` 1.00 Movement. Capacity -.. 636 Probability of Queue free St. 0.58 Step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 f"... ---------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------- Confli.cting- Flows -- 271. Potential Capacity. - 719 Pedestrian Impedance Factor '' 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor - - 1.00 -...Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. __ 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 1.00 Movement Capacity -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 719 Worksheet 6 Shared Lane Calculations Shared Lane Calculations Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 v(vph) 73 267 Movement Capacity 719 636 Shared Lane Capacity 645 ------------ A--------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- Worksheet 10 delay,queue length, and LOS $ubmitteg into thg publii0 11 12 Movement14 ---------------- ----------------------- Jecord in connection will __--------------- item.��-� on1��� Walter�Foetman 0 —113 7 ------ - -- --- N - --- N ------ ------- - - - - - -- ----------------- .. d Channelize: N 00 Grade: -0.00 Lane. usage fof move',ments 7,8&9 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane `3 L T R ,..,:L. ::; T.....•-.:._':. -R...- L. T R ---------- ---1. �.. �:S ..-----_—_— -.c ---.------- _ — _--- — ...---. N N N N N N N N N Channelized: N Grade::, 0.00 Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles: ------------------------------------------------- --=-------------- --------------- Northbound Southbot Shared In volume, major th vehicles: 0 0 Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: .0 0 Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: 1700 1700 Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: _ 1700 1700 Number of major street through lanes: _ 1 0 Length of study period, hrs: 1.00 Worksheet 4 Critical Gap and Follow-up time calculation. Critical Gap Calculations: , Movement 10 11 --------------------------------------------------f---------------------- t c,baset c,hv i 1.0 1.0 P by 0.02 0.02 t c,g 0.2 0.2 G 0.0 0.0 Submitted into the public t 3 , It 0.7 0.0 t c,T: record in Connection Veith item on -ILLOe 1 stage 0.00 0.00 Walter l=oeman 00 I v (vph) 36 304 C m (vph) _ 719 645 v/c 95� queue lengtYi _ 5 0' 47 `Control Delay., f - LO$ yy ._Approach Delay B Approach LOS 15.0 z. _ ... B ------------------------------ 10 Submitted into the public record in connection with item .L on Walter Foeman ®O _ 1 3 7 HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.1c Inter: SE 4 Street and SE 2 Avenue City/St: Miami, FL Analyst-- DPA Pro j_ #: 00124— kHbd: PM P6A-k Hour w/o .project' `6E A --.Street. NIS St: SE i',Aveinue- SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY--: Eastbound Westbound Northb6und7 Southbound T R L T R L _T R L T _.,,.R : ' No. Lanes 0 '0 Qj 0 2 0 7. LGConfig R L-., T Volume 1572 247 1368 Lane Width -0 11.0 11.0 RTOR 0 Duration 1..00 Area Type: CBD or Similar - Signal erat-ions. Phase Combination 1 2 3 5 NB Left Thru Thru -Right -Right* Peds Piidi WB -Left Le f t- -Thru Thru P P Right: Right: Peds Peds NB Right-_:.. EB Right SB Right. WB Right Green 68.0 2 2 Yellow-., -4.0- 4.-0 All Red 1.0 1_0 Cycle Length: 106.0— secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ --Lane Adi Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) 7/—cg/C Delay LOS Delay. LOS Eastbound Westbound Northbound R 1499 2204s. 1.15 0.680 298.6 F 29 8.6 F Southbound L 643 2925 0.*42 0.220 35.6 D T 4203 4424 0.36 0.950 0.4 A 5.8 A Intersection Delay = 150.2 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = F Submitted into the public record in connection with, item on t-2-ky,od Walter Foeman HCS Signalized Intersections Release 3 lc Inter: SE 4 Street and SE 3 Avenue City/St: Miami, FL 1#nalyst DPA ;.Proj, # 00124 Date 07%12/p0 '"' Period: PM.Peak Hour y/o .project S/W'-St:''SE 4 Street N/S St SE 3-°Avenue SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY' Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T. , .,, L <. T: R-_ R No. Lanes :2 2. _:0 ;' 0 :0 0 0_ 2 ;0 p 1:0:, . 0. LGconf ig 1, i , TR TR Volume 591 1100 36 23 9 Lane Width 12.0. 12.,0.-12.0 RTOR Vol 0 .- r. 0 s Duration 1.00 Area Type,: All other areas - ;-Signal O erations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ES 'Left P N3 Left Thru P Thru P Right p, Right P:. Peds Peds WB Left..- - SS Left. ' . Thru Thru Right' Right Peds Peds' d. NB Right.. E3 Right SB Right W3 Right Green 79.0 13.0 -_ Yellow 4.0 4.0 - All Red 0.0 0.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/- Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane -Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay L08 Delay LOS Eastbound L 2767 3502 0..22 0.790 2.9 A TR 2838 3593 0.42 0.790 3.8 A 3.5 A Westbound Northbound TR 450 3462 Southbound 0.07 0.130 38.5 D Intersection Delay = -4.1 (sec/veh) Intersectidn L08 = A Submitted into the public record in connection with item on _/1r-oe Waiter Foeman 00-1�.3"7 HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.1c Interopin.Dr and Biscayne Blvd. City/St: Miami, FL Analy,'st': 'DPA Proj #: 00124 Dat`e'c' 0.7/1'0/00 Period: PM Peak ?dour w/project E/�W:'St:: � Chopin Dr. N/S St: US-1/Biscayne Blvd. irk SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No Lanes, 0 .. 0 0 0 0 2 0 3 0 2 0 0 LGConfig R T L Volume _. 42 1417. 40 Lane WidEti 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vol:`, 4 Duration '1.00'� Area Type: CBD or Similar Signal .0oerations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left N3 Left Thru Thru P Right .... " Right Peds Peds WB Left SB Left P. Thru Thru Right _.- Right Peds Peds NB Right ES Right SB' Right wB Right P. Green 65.0 24.0. Yellow 4.0 4.0 All Red 2.0 1.0 Cycle Length: 100*.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane-, Group 'Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound Westbound 29.6 C R 602 2508 0.07 0.240 29.6 C Northbound _. T 2975 4577 0.52 0.650 9.9 A 9.9 A Southbound L 742 3090 0.06 0.240 29.4 C 29.4 C Intersection Delay = 10.9 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS -B 10 Submitted into the public record in connection with item— on —/y-oc Walter Focman 00 " 1 1 3 . [ U� i HCS-Signals 3.1c File.:SE2ST BISC.HCS Page 1 HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.1c Inter:' SE 2. Street and Biscayne Blvd. City/St: Miami, FL Analyst: DPA Proj #: 00124 Date: 07/10/00 Period: PM Peak Hour w/ project E/W St: SE 2 Street N/S St: US-1/Biscayne Blvd. SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound I Westbound Northbound Southboun L T R 1 L T R L T R L T IN No. Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 3 LGConf ig L R Volume 660 1420 Lane Width 11.0., 11.0 RTOR Vol 0 Duration 1.00 Area Type: CBD or Similar Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left NB Left P Thru Thru Right Right Peds Peds WB Left $B Left Thru Thru Right Right P Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 71.0 17.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0' All Red 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios 'Lane•Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay.LOS Delay LOS East Westbound Northbound L 461 9 Southbound 2710 1.56 0.170 Submitted into the public recor connection with item on 42-h ylcZ Walter Foeman City Clerk i R 2582 3637 0.60 0.710 8.3 A Intersection Delay = (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = HCS-Signals 3.1c File:Se2st2ay.hcs Page 1 HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.1c Inter: -SE 2,Street and SE 2 Avenue City/St. Miami, FL -Analyst:.DPA Proj #: 00124 Date: 07/10/00 Period: PM Peak Hour w/proj. E/W St: SE 2 Street N/S St: SE 2 Avenue SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY, Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound L ' T R L T R L T R No. Lanes 0 0 ' • 0 LGConfig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol 1 2 0 L LT 2595 392 11.0 11.0 0 0 0 Southbound L T R 0 2 1 T R 531 98 11.0 11.0 20 Duration 1.00 Area Type: CBD or Similar Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left ND Left Thru Thru Right Right Peds Peds X WE Left P SB Left Thru P Thru P Right Right P Peds. X Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WE Right Green 64.0 26.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 All Red 1.0 1.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound Westbound L 986 1540 LT 1217 1902 Northbound Fj 0 Southbound 1.16 0.640 310.3 F 1.57 0.640 Submittedi into the public record in connection ILL/d item Walter Foeman City Clerk T 598 2301 0.91 0.260 61.1 E 57.2 E R 358 1377 0.22 0.260 30.5 C Intersection Delav = (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = • HCS-Signals 3.1c File:Se2st3ay.hcs Page 1 HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.1c Inter:- SE 2 Street and SE 3 Avenue City/St: Miami, FL Analyst: DPA. Proj #: 00124 Date: 07/10/00 Period: PM Peak Hour w/project E/W St: SE 2 Street N/S St: SE 3 Avenue SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbou L T R I L T R y L T R�L T No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol 0 0 • 0 0 5 0 TR 2346 84 11.0 8 1 2 0 L LT 764 254 11.0 ;.1.0 Duration 1.00 Area Type: CBD or Similar -Signal Operations Phase Combination 2 3 4 5 EB Left. NB Left P Thru Thru P Right Right Peds Peds WB Left SB Left Thru P Thru Right P Right Peds. Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 52.0 40.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 All Red 0.0 0.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary_ Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios 'Lane.Group Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay.LOS Eastbound Westbound TR 2935 38% 9 Northbound L 616 LT 816 Southbound 5645 0.97 0.520 N I 1540 0.58 0.400 27.6 C 2041 1.03 0.400 122.6 F Submitted into the public record in connection with Item 4—L on IL/ff1� Walter Foeman P- W 0 0 0 7 8 Approach Delay LOS 38.9 D 94.0 F 00-1137 Intersection Delay = 55.2 (sect`/v6E) Intersection LOS = E • HCS-Signals 3.1c File:Se3st2ay.hcs Page 1 HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.1c Inter: SE 3. Street and SE 2 Avenue City/St: Miami, FL Analyst,: DPA Proj # : 00124 Dater 07/10/00 Period: PM Peak Hour w/project E/W St: SE 3 Street N/S St: SE 2 Avenue Eastbound L T R SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY IWestbound I Northbound L T R L T R Southbound L T R No. Lanes 0 1 - 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 LGConfig T R TR Volume 367 457 1501 1769 Lane Width 11.0 11.0 11.0 RTOR Vol 150 1130 Duration 1.00 Area Type: CBD or Similar Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left NB Left Thru P Thru Right P Right Peds Peds WB Left SB Left Thru Thru P Right Right P Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 32.0 60.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 All Red 0.0 0.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios 'Lane .Group Approach Lane. Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity' (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound T 519 1621 0.75 0.320 40.7 D 37.4 D R 547 1708 0.60 0.320 33.4 C Westbound Submitted into the public Northbound record in connection with item on jjL111od Walter Foeman City Clerk,. 40 Southbound 0 0 - 113 7 TR 2006 3344 1.14 0.600 270.5 F 270.5 F Intersection Delay = 214.7 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = F HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.1c Inter: SE 3 Street and SE 3' Avenue `% Cf ty/S; .' `Miami - FL Analyst:'DPA Proj #:'00124 DfLte:., ..07/10/00_.: :" ;:; ; ftriod: PK, eak,.Hour w% -prdj,ect', E%W St: SE 3 ;i.Street N/S St: SE 3: -Avenue SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY ,, Eastbound_:. westbound horthbouh 7 outhbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No....Lanes -.. 1 z ,`.: p..: 1. p Q 3 0 0 0 :0 LGConf ig LT LT - . TR Volume 36 5.6 11-7 232 796 79 Lane Width ; 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vol .._. _ ... _.., } r 0. Duration 1.00 Area Type: All other areas Signal O eratiors Phase Combination_ _.l ;2 3 4 5 6 :7_ 8 EB Left P NB Left Thru P Thru .P Right _ Right .- P ., Peds: Peds WB Left A A Thru __SB .-Left Thru .._ _ _ - -- ::_ - - Rght Right: . Peds Peds NS Right-.. EB Right SB Right WB Richt Green 11.0 41.0 ;36.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 4.0 Ali Red 0.0 0.0 p,p Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group AppPoach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound LT 205 Westbound LT 766 1863 0.50 0.110 50.5 D 50..5 D 1869 0.51 0.410 22.5 C 22.5 C Northbound TR 1842 5117 s 0.53 0.360 26.4 C 26.4 C Southbound Intersection Delay = 27.0 (sec/veh) Intersectidn LOS = C 1 i Submitted into the public record in connection veith item) on—/Y--oa Walter Foerr an Oit ! t7infl, 00-113'7 HCS: Ur>sivdited Menediem Release 3.1c iWO-WAY STUP CONTROL(NSCI A kYSIS Ardyst, ONE UTAMI PARCEL A Idwtdim SE 3. STREET/BISCAYNE BLW Timc.PtntidP>dP1( ' I dersedim Orieridim North-Sc th Mgor St. Wide Vdune Oda MOMMrls: 1 10 11 --------------------------- --- ---- Vdun� .521. ..69- .254 HFR:.. 555 73 267 PHF.:: 0.95 ., °, D.95 HD.95 Pw-. 0.02-: 0.02 - 0.02 Pedestnm VdL ne Oda ' IAaernert5: lore aidh Wdh speed ;; Biccka: Medan Type. Nore Florid approach Mmmerts: d vehicles: EostEard . 0 j d yehdes:.Wesibrud D • .. - Lore taa¢ for rnaernerts 1,20 prow' Lore 1 1 I me 2 lore 3 . L T. R. L T R L T R -----N ----� -. N N N N N N N �kmliied N . ' (; D.DD Lmc tact fa maemeris 4,5k6 gpraiK Lam 1 Lam 7 Lare 3 i T R L T R L T R ' ------------- N N N N N N N N N 1 Ctrrrelited N Grc� D.OD Lars LEV tar r Dmbis 1,8A9 ocgDxh Submitted into the public Lore 1 Lore 2 A T L Lore 3 T R record in connection vvitb ti l -- - - H N N N N N N. N N Waiter Foeman 00 „-113'7 Cfm•dited N Grc, D.00 r_ Lort usage for moremut s 10,11 do 12 tppromc lae 1_. Lut7 Lae 3 Y 4...- -N `...Y _...:._ Y - N -.. —A N ....-N ... Chordited N Ddo for Conpdjrg Efled d Odcy to Mgor Slred Yehdn: _. Nof ud Sod tud - _ .. Shoed In vdt nc, mga fh vehids: 0 Shoed In vdune, rngorrf vehidrs`'- D SdIW rdk:mgor thvdides::-.. 170D 1100; Sd Aovi.rdk,*r� f vehides::-, la 1200 Nunbu d m# stied dhra6yh loves: 1 .0 Lugh d stuffy penod hrs:. 1.00. Worksreel 4 Crificd"Gap ord Fdlow-up time ccl ldiart Critical Gap Cdculdions. Idalnerl ---------- - - ------------------- Ome 7.1 6.5 --------------------------------- ----- I C.N 1.0 1.0 . P hw D.02 D.D2 I Cg D.2 02 G D.DD 0.00 f 3tit D.i D.D t c T. 1 slage D.DD 0.00 I 1 st09t 6.4 6.5 Fdlcw Up Time Cdca/dior6: ► --------------------------- I,bosc 3.5 4.0 ------------------------- ---------- I f •fiV .__ 0.9 09 P IN D.02 D.D2 t f 3.5 4.0 Worksheel 6 Irnpedorce o•d c='Iy colons 1 Sleo 3:1N Irorn Mina St. 6 11 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Corliidirg Flows 555 Pderlid Copmly 440 Pedtslrirn ImXcbu Fodor 1.DD Submitted into the public Cop Ag. loch 64 to Irnpedrg mvmnl 1.0D . record in connection .with IIDMITI l-CCp Ij 440 ItE'n1 Z—� on Probcbllty d OLu Iree St, ------------------------------------------------------ 0.39 Walter �o-- _ n 0 Step 1: ,LT Irom Mira St. 1 10 . Cori,Iidirg floras Pd id:'Copmty Per}stdo ImpedTa fad or Mq. I, Min T Impedarce !odor ' ' Mq. 1, Alin T Arij. Imp Fodor. tada di to Imp6tg nwmd Moitnert Ctpmty -------------------------------- vdt ifi t'8 shred Lat Cdamin Sh�ed� lug"Cdaldiors Maert 1 8 ---------------------------------- Moaner! Cop¢ity St+aed Car C*ly ---------------------------------- vlorksttd 1D ddarr,geLz le* ord COS Mo+ernert 1 4 1. B ---------------------------------- v(,Vph) C m(vph) Y/C 95% 4xix "h Corird Odof LOS Acpromh Deloy Agxorth LOS ---------------------------------- 555 493 UO 1.00 493 9 1D 11 12 {{------------- { 13 267 493 440 446 9 10 11 12 ----------- 36 304 493 446 0.01 '0.6a 12.9 29.8 H 0 28.0 0 ------------------------------------------- i Submitted into the public record in connection vvith item -- on Walter Foeman 0 0 -113 "7 HCS-Signals 3.1c File:Se4st2ay.hcs Page 1 HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.1c Inter`: BE 4 Street and SE 2 Avenue City/St: Miami, FL 'Analyst : -DPA ti_ Proj # : 00124 Date: 07/10/00 Period: PM Peak Hour w/project E/W St: SE.4_Street N/S St: SE 2 Avenue Eastb L T SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Westbound Northbound R 1 L T R I L T R No. Lanes 0 0 0 LGConf ig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol 0 0 0 Southbound L T R 0 0 2 2 3. 0 R L T 1602 324 1473 11.0 11.0 11.0 0 Duration 1.00 Area Type: CBD or Similar Signal Operations Phase Combination 1.. 2 3 .4 5 6 7 8 EB Left NB Left Thru Thru Right Right P Peds Peds WB Left SB Left. P Thru Thru P P Right _ _. _ _ Right Peds -Peas NB Right EB Righb SB Right :=. - WB Right Green - - 68-_-0, '22% 0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 All Red 1.0 1.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity. I (s) . v c g/C Delay LOS Delay__LOS Eastbound Westbound Northbound J R 1499 Southbound f 3.37.3 F 2204 1.17 0.680 337.3 F L 643 2925 0.55 0.2 �81 D T 4203 4424 0.39 0.9 bm'®te.into Ithe pup :q - A record in connection with Intersection Delay = 162.8 (s e dAftZ—S riftegsi n LOS = F Waiter Foeman— .. HCS-Signals..3.lc File:Se4st3ay.hcs �Page I t HCS:_Signalized Intersections Release 3.1c Inter: SE 4 Street and SE 3 Avenue City/St: Miami, FL -Analyst: DPk 10: Pr6j-00124! ' Date" '':07/10/00 r 6d: I'M ]�'k liour Period e& w/project E/Wist o S E -'4 8 -E' r 6.e-:t SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY ------ 414E66und;`:' .-Ne rthb 'oun d� .,Soutjjb L 7 "'C7�-� I; R, L --T' R L No. Lanes 0 2 _0 0 ' LGC,'.6nf ig L `_TR 'TR volume 591 1207 36 23 9 Lane.width 12.0 12.0 12.. 0 RTOR_'Vol 0 0 Duration - 0 0 -.-Area Type.:. -All other areas ------ SignaL, Qperat-ions Phase Combination -1 2 3 5 6 7 8 EB_ 'Left P NB Left Thru P, ThriA. P Right, P Right P Peds Peds' - WE Left SB Left- Thru, Thru Right: Right Peds Peds NB Right EB Right;. SB Right WE Right Green 79.0 113.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 All Red 0.0 0.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj-Sat tRatios LAneGroup Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity*. (s) V/c Delay LOS Delay Eastbound L 2767 3502 0.22 0.790 2.9 A TR 2839 3594 0.46 0.790 4.0 A 3.6 A Westbound Northbound TR 450 10 3462 0.07 0.130 38.5 D 38.5 D Southbound Submitted into the public record in connection with Intersection Delay = 4.2 (sec ftewhQL1rtmYAa6tL6K LOS = A Wa ter Foeman A-q Ptl_ Page. 1. F x Hcg-: ti, gnalIzed' lntersect-ions. Release. 3,..1c ln'ttir: .8':Lisd'a�r�ne"�El-vd-.'/,'Ma-inDriveway . Citty,/:5t.: Miami., FL -Ari a*1 st DPP,, P di- *: '0-0.1 .4' Date: 07/1Z/2000 P'eriod,:. PM' -Peak V/proj,ect-�., .E/W St: Biscayne --Blvd NIS St: Main Driveway No., taines L I GCoftf ig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol _8ALI ZED, INTERSECTION, SUMMARY E' Northbound gsEt)diind. Westbound . � Northb -d L T R L. T R 2 1 0 0 0; 0, 6 L T T 1110 107 .251 12.0 10.0 i2.0 Southbound L T R 0 0 0- Duration 1.00 Area T-ype: All other -areas Signal operations Phase Combija&tion. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 :8 EB Left A NB Left Thru A Thru. A Right Right Peds Peds WB Left S B Left Thru Thru Right Right Peds Peds- NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 57.0 35.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 All Red 0..0 '0.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs — Intersection Performancd Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group -Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) V/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 1957 3433 0.60 0.570 14. S T 1011 1773 0.11 0.570 9.9 A 14.1 B Westbound Northbound T 1263 3610 0.21 0.350 22.9 C 22.9 C Southbound Submitted into the public record in connection with item 22-L on 1_2-1qlcd Intersection Delay = 15.6 (sec/veh) WWtm3FeeM1aM'on"q_ I f 37 Citv iiin* lC' I&a a PM EXPRbS Ar'dy Od�Wi j .Time•Periaf PM PR... Irdersedian Orieridiorc Ncrlh-Salh Mgor St. `'Veide ft ne'Oda I�aemerts: 2 9 . "Vduac ' :" 1361 123 FR PHP.. 0.95 D.95 ..P1 .- r..: :0.02 , 0.00 -- medm Type Nore d veh dm ,0 fired opprcafi fdaerr is d vehides: EoslbaA D d v&ides: Weslbwrd 0 lad:uso; Ior maemed5 1A3 ap axK Lme 1 lore 2 lase 3 L T R L T R l T R ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- N Y N N Y N N Y N S Chardired N Graff D.DO LDt usage la moweris 1,5h6 qprracch ' Lore 1 lase 2 lase 3 ' l T R l T R L T R ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- N N N N N N N N N i Chon'dited Graff: HD lase usage la rnaerneds 1,8&9 cMaxh Submitted into the ,public lore 1 Lase 2 Lase 3 record in connection with L T R L 1 R L T R item Z—S on—/4/r06' -------------------- ------------------------------- -------------Vlialier F.rp an N N Y N N N N N N . ('it- r"inr! Lot :1. lore 2 lom 3 s L .. T R T R l T R---------------- 4 -------- -- N N N N _..N: N N N N CtrrrJited N ti - .J,_._ Gmdt n. - Odo for Cornpilrcg Elled d OeIcy to Mgor Sired Vef>ides: -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------_-_---- Naftard Sailtud Shared in At ingor Ih vefides: 0 0 Sinred In vdune, mqa d vehides: 0 0 Sd Hu rdr rnga thvdides:__- 11DD 17DO ' 5d Ib rdk rnga d vefides: , 1700 - t700 Nunter of mgor sired tivaujs Ions: 3 "'..0 Lt4h d sto pence, hrs: Cri!i[d Gcp ord Fdlox-up time cdaldim' - CriGad Gap CdaJdians: MD;CMM 9 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I ruse 6.9 I ON 2.0 P tv 0.00 a,9 D.1 G 000 l 3;1 0.0 GT. 1 stake D DO tC 1514 6.9 s Tdlcw Up Time Cdaldin 1ADiM•i 9 -------------------------- w I,aae 3.3 ! IN 1.0 P h. 0.00 t! 3.3 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Wodksttd 6 Imptbv- ord al pi ec}dions Step 1: RT Iran Mira St. 9 12 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------=------------ 44 PoICHI ry Flaw 539 Submitted into the Pderl�d CoptLily 539 public htstrim Impedare Foda 1.Do record in connection v►pith Moremcd C*IY 539 item L-L on—/c{--oa Prddilily d Drxre Iree St. 0.15 Waftei FofT3an - --------------------------------- --- CIh- r�!-%.� 0.0-113'7 R • t I Submitted into the public record in connection with item on 1-2-14L" Walter Foeman rj-.,6 4 0 13 7 • • Submitted into the public record in connection vvith item Z—S on Walter Foeman o 0 -1 3 7 Gifi; rig, , • HCS-Signals 3.1c File: SE2ST BISC.HCS Page 1 HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.1c Inter:, SE 2 Street and Biscayne Blvd. City/St: Miami, FL Analyst: DPA Proj #: 00124 Date: 07/13/00 Period: PM Peak Hour w/ project (: E/W St: SE 2 Street N/S St: US-1/Biscayne Blvd. Eastb L T 9 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY IWestbound Northbound L T R I L T R Southbound L T R No. Lanes 0 LGConf ig . Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol 0 0 0 0 0 2 L 660.. 11.0 0 0 0 0 3 R 142( 11.c 0 Duration 1.00 Area Type: CBD or Similar Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left NE Left P Thru Thru Right Right Peds Peds WB Left SB Left Thru Thru Right Right P Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WE Right Green 46.0 40.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0. All Red 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound Submitted into the public Westbound recor . in connection with item on !� . Walter Foeman Northbound City Cie* L 1084 2710 0.66 0.400 27.7 C 27.7 C Southbound Q ® 1 1 3 r7 31.0 C R 1746 3637 0.88 0.480 31.0 C Intersection Delay = 30.0 _(sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C ..__....... ...... ._.... . HCS-Signals 3.1c File:Se2st2ay.hcs Page 1 HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.1c Inter: SE 2 Street and SE 2 Avenue City/St: Miami, FL Analyst: DPA' Proj #: 00124 Date: 07/13/00 Period: PM Peak Hour w/proj. (imp) E/W St: SE 2 Street N/S St: SE 2 Avenue No. Lanes LGConf ig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound L T R L T R L T R 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 .0 L LT 2595 392 11.0 11.0 Southbound L T R 0 3 0 TR 531 98 11.0 40 Duration 1.00 Area Type: CBD or Similar Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left NB Left Thru Thru Right Right Peds Peds X WB Left P SB Left Thru P Thru P Right Right P Peds X Peds- ND Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 68.0 24.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 All Red 0.0 0.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Patios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound Westbound L 2051 3016 0.56 0.680 3.5 A LT 2034 2991 0.94 0.680 16.9 B 12.0. B Northbound Southbound rR 824 3435 Submitted into the public record in connection w'th item I --� on Walter Foeman City Clerk 0.73 0.240 40.6 D 00-113'7 . o :1009�1 Intersection Delay = 16.8 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B HCS-Signals 3.1c File:Se3st2ay.hcs Page 1 HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.1c Inter: SE 3'Street and SE 2 Avenue City/St: Miami, FL Analyst': DPA . Proj ## : 00124 Date: 07/13/00 Period: PM Peak Hour w/project (im, E/W St: SE 3 Street N/S St: SE 2 Avenue • Eastbound L T R SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY iWestbound Northbound L T R I L T R Southbound L T R No. Lanes 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 LGConfig T R TR Volume 367 457 1501 1769 Lane Width 11.0 11.0 11.0 RTOR Vol 150 1130 Duration 1.00 Area Type: CBD or Similar Signal Operations Phase Combination 1' 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left NB Left Thru P Thru Right P Right Peds Peds WB Left SB Left Thru Thru P Right Right P Peds Peds;, NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 25.0 67.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 All Red 0.0 0.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance, Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay'LOS Delay LOS Eastbound $ T 409 1637 0.95 0.250 91.6 F 71.5 E R 431 1'725 0.76 0-250 47.5 D Westbound Subrni'tted into the public record in connection with Northbound item�- - on /-Z/�__// u Walter Foeman City Clerk Southbound 00 _ 11 se�� 7 rR 2231 3330 1.02 0.670 67.4 E 67.4 - E Intersection Delay = 68.4 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = E • HCS-Signals 3.1c File:Se4st2ay.hcs Page 1 HCS: Signalized Intersections Release 3.1c Inter: SE 4 Street and SE 2 Avenue City/St: Miami, FL -Analyst: DPA * Proj #: 00124 Date: 07/13/00 Period: PM Peak Hour w/project (imp E/W St: SE 4 Street N/S St: SE 2 Avenue SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L. T R No. Lanes LGConf ig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 72 3 0 R L T 1602 324 1473 11.0 11.0 11.0 0 Duration 1.00 Area Type: CBD or Similar Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 EB Left NB Left Thru Thru Right Right P Peds Peds WB Left Thru SB Left Thru P Right Right Peds Ped$, NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 78.0 Yellow 4.0 All Red 1.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary_ Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay'LOS East ,� a 12.0 4.0 1.0 7 8 Approach Delay LOS Submitted into the public Westbound n Connection With record 2 �� item► on .1 �I Walter Foeman Northbound i City Clerk 81.4 F 719 2204 1.02 0.780 81,4 F Southbound L 351 2925 1.01 0.120 154.4 F0+1137 r 4203 4424 0.39 0.950 0.5 A 28.2 C Intersection Delay = 53.3 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = D • ONE MIAM, I Biscayne Boulevard & SE 41h Street SNIt.e Utility Study CTE Project No. 00-0.710 Prepared by: Consul -Tech Engineering, Inc. 10570 N.W. 27th Street, Suite 191 Miami, Florida 33172 submitted into the public record in connection with item on _alfwm Walter Foeman City Clerk SEPTEMBER 2000 Q 0 _ 113'7 DRALNIAGE 1. Drainage Area Details Submitted +►fn On rmhlic recorq in cunnecoun with item on _ULL_-L69 Walter Foeman City Clerk The proposed site is located at the intersection of Biscayne Boulevard and SE 41h Street in the City of Miami bordered on the east side by Biscayne Bay and on the south side by the Miami River. The site, consisting of 3.04 acres, is currently vacant except for a waterfront concrete sidewalk and existing utilities. Currently, there is a looped drainage system running along the perimeter of the site that was constructed by the.developer of an adjacent hotel tower. The existing system is inside a 23-foot utility easement and is to be shared by both property owners. The proposed project consists of a 34-story office tower, a 46- and a 49-story residential building and a 12-story parking garage. Development will produce a site which is approximately 100% impervious. Landscape planters and green areas are provided, but these areas are minimal and will be disregarded for calculation purposes. Storm water discharge will consist of runoff from rooftops, roadways, vertical building faces and pedestrian areas. Miami -Dade DER.N1 requires that the proposed drainage system take into account 30% of the largest vertical building face. The building faces exposed to the south will produce the largest amounts of runoff and will be accounted for in the calculations. The site land use can be summarized as follows: Total Net Impervious -Vertical Total Lot Area Area Building Faces Drainage Area Acres Acres (30%) (Acres) Acres 3.04 3.04 1.89 4.93 2. Proposed Drainage System — The proposed drainage plan calls for all pavement runoff to be collected in catch basins capable of detaining the peak inflow from the Miami -Dade County DERM 5- g1jbfp1ttad into the public f@@@rd in connection with on 1�11 UL�,� Walter Foeman City Clerk year, 24-hour design storm for 90 se on s. These basins also contain baffles to prevent all oil, grease and foreign matter from flowing into the proposed system. The runoff will then flow into four proposed drainage wells based on calculations found in Table 1. Runoff from building rooftops and vertical faces are uncontaminated by oil and grease and maybe piped directly to the drainage wells. The use of drainage wells are permitted by Dade County DERIM in this area due to the high level of salinity found in the groundwater. The proposed drainage wells will be interconnected to an existing drainage well system built inside the 25-foot utility easement found on -site. This existing system was designed for an off -site hotel tower and is comprised of three deep injection wells with runoff being piped to them by 12- inch reinforced concrete pipes. The proposed wells will be cut into the existing system and an emergency outfall to Biscayne Bay will provide an added measure of safety. Since the proposed system is using a combination of wells and an outfall to dispose of excess runoff, the system Nvill be designed to treat the first inch of runoff generated before disposing of any runoff. The prod osed wells and outfall will keep the site dry during the DEP.-M 5 year - 24 hour storm, keep the flooding below the site perimeter elevation during the SFWMD 25 year - 72 hour storm, and keep the flooding below the minimum building finished floor elevation during the SFWMD 100 year - 72 hour storm. Biscayne Boulevard is a Florida Department of Transportation right-of-way, State Road Number 5. According to Department rules, additional calculations must be performed to prove to the Department that there will be no discharge into the State right-of-way. The drainage well system will be, designed to retain the maximum storm stage of the 100-year, 1-, 2-, 4-, 8-, 24-, 72-, 168- and 240-hour storm events. i II. WATER DISTRIBUTION IVIASTER PLAN The Miami -Dade Water and Sewer Department (MD-WASD) provides the water service in this area. The site will is served by a 24-inch ductile iron water main located within the SE 0Q— 113 d 2 Submitted into the public record in connection with item halter Foeman City Clerk 4th Street and Biscayne Boulevard rights-of-�ayad'rby a 12-inch ductile iron water main terminating inside the 25' utility easement in the northeastern portion.of the site. Refer to the attached Water Atlas for additional information. The Miami -Dade Water and Sever Department QvID-NASD) is requiring the interconnection of the existing 12- and 24-inch water mains by way of a new 12-inch ductile iron water main within the 25' utility easement. Domestic water services and fire line connections for this project will be provided from the new 12-inch water main. Two fire hydrants are also to be installed on the proposed water main. The anticipated average daily water consumption for the entire project is 155, 703 gpd, and is calculated as shown in Table 2. III. SA\'ITARY SENVER 'MASTER PLAN The Miami -Dade Water and Sewer Department (MD -`NASD) provides the sanitary sewer service in this area. The site is served by a 10-inch sewer main located within the SE 4th Street and Biscayne Boulevard rights -of -way and a 12-inch sewer main located inside the 25' utility easement in the northeastern portion of the site. Refer to the attached Sewer Atlas for additional information. The existing sewer lines have sufficient invert elevation and capacity to collect the sewage flow from this project. An S" sewer extension is proposed connecting the 30 story office tower to the existing manhole on the comer of SE 4"' Street and Biscayne Boulevard. This sewer line will extend into the project and will require 2 new manholes. The apartment buildings and garage will connect to an existing manhole in the northeast portion of the site with a new lateral. This project is anticipated to generate an average daily sewage flow of 155, 703 gpd, and is calculated as shown in Table 2. The \t-astewater produced by the site will travel via the existing sanitary sewer system to the • MD -NASD regional Pump Station No. 1. Pump station No. 1 is a very large pump station currently operating 7.34 hours per day. The additional 155, 703 gpd will only increase the 0a-1137 3 elapsed time by 0.02-hours_to 7.36 hoursper;day...Thus,=the pump station is deemed capable of handling the proposed flow from the project. Pump Station No. 1 transmits all flow 5 directly to tie ,M `NASD treatment plant "on �rir�inia Key for final treatment before discharge into the Atlantic'O�cean: Refer to'the attached Miami -Dade DERi`vi projections.for more information.:., T SOLID VASTE, GE\'ER4TIOi!' - Solid Ax aste_erierated-will' be placed in-standardized=on-§ite =containers .-for-.refuse and mcyclables`per. .the City,,--of-Miami Code -for regular -pickup by private-haulingcompa hies and/or.the City of Miami Solid Waste Department. `The solid -waste -will then be transported to Metro-Dade=s`Disposal Facilities. Actual w aste pick-up iocations-will be sho%�-n in the. architectural plans.-*--''_ r This project is anticipated to generate an average daily solid waste, volume of 73.76 Cu. Yd/day, and is calculated as shown in Table 1. �- Generation rates were determined from data provided b"ythe Metro -Dade CountyDepartment of Solid Waste: - TABLE 1 ONE \IIAMI DR4I\'AGE CALCULATIONS 1. Total Gross Lot Area = 3.04 Acres Total Drainage Area _ — 4.93 Acres 1. Impervious- = 100% or 4.93 Acres 2. Pervious = 0% or 0.00 Acres 2. Average Runoff Coefficient = 0.98 3. SFWMD Design Storm Information . 1. 5-Year 24-Hour Storm (Miami -Dade County W.C. 1.1) Rainfall Intensity = 6.17 inches per hour Purpose = Flood Protection Peak Runoff = CIA=(0.98)(6.17)(4.93) = 29.81 cfs 2. SF�NWD 25 Year - 72 Hour Storm (SFNVMD Distribution, Figure C-I-6) Rainfall Intensity = 6.984 inches per hour Purpose = Perimeter Berm Peak Runoff =CIA=(0.98)(6.9S4)(�.93) = 33.74 cfs 3. SFWMD 100 Year - 72 Hour Storm (SFWMD Distribution, Figure C-I-7) 24 Hour Rainfall = 7.436 inches per hour Purpose = Finished Floor Elevation Peak Runoff = CIA=(0.98)(7.436)(4.9 )) = 35.93 cfs 4. FDOT Design Storm Information -- Storm Duration Rainfall Amount (Inches) 1 Hour 5.1 (Figures 5-1 & 5-11) t 2 Hour 6.3 (Figures 5-1 & 5-11) 4 Hour 7.8 (Figures 5-1 & 5-11) i 8 Hour 9.6 (Figures 5-1 & 5-11) 24 Hodr 14.0 (Figure 5-13) 72 Hour 19.0 (Figures 5-14 & 5-15) 16S Hour 240 Hour 20.0 (Figure 5-16) 23.0 (FiAT'it' into the public record i connection with :item Z-S on r,2—/y-oa. .;:. -1 Walter Foernan 0 0— 1 3 l 1 4. Well Data 1.. Well Diameter = 24 Inches 2. - Assumed Well Capacity = 1000 gpm/ft. of Available Head 3. Mean High Tide Elevation =1.5? ft. (taken from W.C. 30,034-A) 4. Specific Gravity Head Loss = 2.00' 5. Proppsed_Number of Wells = 4 5. Hydraulic Grade. Line Elevations at Well, Structure„ 1. 5 Year DERN1 Storm {(29-81 cfs)/[(-1000 gpm/ft-.head)(0.002228- cfslapm)(4 wells)]: }.- (1::52 T 2.00) = 6.S6' \GVD 2. SFWMD'25 Year - 72 `Hour Storm ' - • = (33.74)[(1000 gpm)(0.00222s cNapm)(4 wells)] T (1; 52 + 2.00) = 7.3 V NGVD = 3. SFWMD 100,Year - 72 Hour Storm = (35.93 cfs)[(1000 gpm)(0.00222S cfs/Qpm)(4 wells)) ;- (1.52 + 2.00) = 7.55' NNGVD r Submitted into the public record in connection vaith item Z- on - tC�� oa Ini Walter Fu-man , o `► 113 7 . ._._...._._._. _.... _.... TABLE 2 Oi\'E i\IIAIIII AIM ICIPATED AVERAGE DAILY FLOW OF WATER AND WASTEWATER Residential Tower 425 units Office Tower & Building 707, 025 sf of office space @ 200 epd/unit @ 10 gpdI100 sf Total ANTICIPATED AVERAGE DAILY FLOW WASTEWATER Average Flow , = 0.1557 mad Peal: Flow = 0.5839 mad NOTES: = 85, 000 opd = 70, 703 gpd =155. 703 mod 1. Peak flow uses a factor of 3.75 times average flow (Recommended Standards for Wastewater Facilities, 1990 Edition) 2. gpd = gallons per day 3. No industrial wastewater is anticipated to be generated 4. rn ,d = million galls per day Submitted into the public record in connection with item L-:L on f-2-1cr--oo Waiter Foeman 0 0 _ 1713 7 Residential Tower 425 units @ 8 lbs per unit/day = 3, 400 lbs/day Office Tower & Building 707, 025 sf office building @ 2.5 lbs per 100 sf/day = 17, 676 lbs/day Total= 21. 076 lbs/dav Total= 10.54 tons/dav Total anticipated Solid Waste generated: 7 cu. yds./ton x 10.54 tons/day — 73.76 Cu. Yds./day I Submitted into the public record in connection with item .2—L on —/Y-oa Walter Foeman 004137 Submitted into the recor Public �. itern �n Onnection tvith on �� Walter F019Man MD-WASD WATER ATLAS '4( e►erk 9219 12 Lj 44 118 cV 9219 9c19 Li327 z I — 17 7 > 328_ S.E. 9219 266 N I ST 2 I c3 787 8 ,.. -12 ,. 330 L� 288 288 92I9 > I N 1' 921S 9219 5219 I 266 N 1461 13 8.. SE. 2 7 S T. 4 p a0 3.2 9 77of 24 I' ' . ,, 329 9219 W u y 9219 1546 Z 12 N 40 9219 ti 1112 7367 1048 N I 8 S' 3 1 S T. I U 7367 3 % 367 9215\ cD 7Cc 1048 7367.3 / 2 2 :� �4 � elscaYN E I 48 BLVD. 10 4JAY 1039 9219 S.E. G S T ��---� � 17 7367 . 1 DD MIAM1 10390 , �f" \ 2 DtV98163 lC II=IO-9$)�- i I i 958IV 9 1 l 3540 6 8R/ Q r l 3 207 �6 E a C 9585 O "12 946 Q nT 417 4 6_ 68 2I 1 Q 9616 1 1286 \ f . _._ < cn 3 • • � 2623 F 14 �- -� S.E. MIAMI Submitted into the publi6 record,jin connection/ with item on Walter Foenl&n MD-WASD SEWER ATLAS rlry C1e ik 24\ j --� v LqZ.372 29�12 N ST ;23 �..Cn 4499 d �-_-�\\1 � -�.�- 1-7 P�, .I,. 510 7. 5 � SUMMARY OF BENEFITS Significant Community Benefits: • Jobs • Wages • Taxes . Economic Activity • Vehicular and Pedestrian Safety Enhancements The following table and chart summarize the economic impact of the One Miami development: CONSTRUCTION PERIOD ANNUAL IMPACT RECURRING Economic Activity . . Output S 274,474,625 $ 1,879,200 Wages _ 90,464,688 1,879,200 Taxes 5,407,154 Total S 364,939,313 S 9,165,554 Jobs Created 425 30 .s f Submitted into the public record in connection with item ,2Z—L on 1-2-14(--pe . anarpton, t3runson ry Walter Foeman o 0 —113 e 6 Company, P.A. � Cif, r;�,, ONE MIAMI EXECUTIVE SUMMARY s i Submitted into the public record in connection with item on LZ=L�—oa Waiter Foeman EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This document represents an economic and tax -benefits analysis of the impact created by One Miami. This analysis encompasses the entire Project and estimates the economic and tax benefits for both its developmental and operational phases. Submitted into the. public; record in connection veith Snarpton, Brunson 3 Company, P.A. item Z� ' on /cr.oa Waiter Foernan ®o 1 1 3 7 SUMMARY OF BENEFITS The Project will bring significant economic benefits to the City of Miami. This section summarizes the impact of the Project on employment, public section revenue and other economic benefits as a result of the development. Employment Employment consideratic is include the direct employment resulting from the Project and employment created in the surrounding community through resident's and visitor's spending. Average developmental construction phase employment will be approximately 425 employees, and the Project's management is expected to employ 30 people for on -going maintenance and operations. Developmental Phase Wages Operational Phase Wages Tax Revenue S 48,140,000 S 1,000,000 The estimate of the public sector revenues associated with the development includes taxes and other revenues generated directly by the Project. Although public sector costs are important elements in measuring fiscal impact, these benefits have not been quantified in this document. This analysis only measures the benefits derived from the development. Annual tax revenue expected to be created totals $5,407,154. ` Summary of Economic Impact ; The estimate of total economic impact is measured by total output, and wages. This analysis measures the economic impact of developmental costs and ongoing operational expenditures. - To determine the effect of respending within the City, we utilized a multiplier to compute total direct and indirect benefits. Total economic impact expected to be generated, as a result of the developmental and operational phases of the Project will approximate the following: One time Annual $364,939,313 S 3,758,400 Submitted into the public record in connection with item on 00-1137 zinarpmn, Brunson a. Company, r.H. Walter Foeman ONE MIAMI EXECUTIVE SUMMARY f M } Submitted into the public record in connection vvith item 2L=L on -/Y oe Walter Foeman 00 _ 113 7 SUMMARY OF BENEFITS Significant Community Benefits: • .lobs • Wages • Taxes • Economic Activity • Vehicular and Pedestrian Safety Enhancements The following table and chart summarize the economic impact of the One Miami development: CONSTRUCTION PERIOD ANNUAL IMPACT RECURRING Economic Activity Output S 274,474,625 S 1,879,200 Wages 90,464,688 1,879,200 Taxes Total Jobs Created. 6narpton, Brunson e. Company, P.A. S 364,939,313 425 5,407,154 9,165,554 30 Submitted into the public record in connection with item on —/v—oe Walter Foeman 004137 J-87-1108 121YJ/87 SOLUTION NO. S7-1148 ® !Master A RESOLUTION CONCERNING THE DOWNTOWN MIAMI DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT, ENCOMPASSING AN AREA OF THE CITY OF MIAMI 'UNDER THE JURISDICTION OF THE MIAMI DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST AREA AS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN, PURSUANT TO AN APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL PROPOSED BY THE MIAMI DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY; AUTHORIZING A MASTER DEVELOPMENT ORDER; APPROVING SAID DEVELOPMENT OF _ REGIONAL IMPACT AFTER CONSIDERING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE SOUTH FLORIDA REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL AND THE CITY OF MIAMI PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD, SUBJECT'TO THE CONDITIONS OF THE MASTER DEVELOPMENT ORDER ATTACHED HERETO AS EXHIBIT "A", THE APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL INCORPORATED HEREIN BY REFERENCE, AND THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE SOUTH FLORIDA REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL INCORPORATED HEREIN BY REFERENCE; MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND — CONCLUSIONS OF LAW; PROVIDING THAT THE MASTER DEVELOPMENT ORDER SHALL BE BINDING ON THE APPLICANT AND SUCCESSORS' 1N INTEREST; DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO SEND COPIES OF THIS RESOLUTION AND MASTER DEVELOPMENT ORDER TO AFFECTED AGENCIES AND THE APPLICANT; DIRECTING THE CITY MANAGER TO TAKE ALL ACTIONS NECESSARY TO FULFILL THE CITY'S OBLIGATIONS UNDER THE MASTER DEVELOPMENT ORDER; AND PROVIDING A SEYERABILITY 'CLAUSE. WHEREAS, on November 26, 1986, the Downtown Development Authority of the City of Miami submitted a complete Application for Development Approval for a Development of Regional Impact to the South Florida Regional Planning Council, the Florida Department of Community Affairs, and the City of Miami pursuant to c �c F.S. 380.06 (1987), for the ongoing development through the year 2007 of a C ct c o U portion of the area within the DOA jurisdiction, as legally described in the .0 LL. ' U Development Order attached hereto; and _O c-- C- CU WHEREAS, the Miami Planning Advisory Board, at its meeting held on c o O V December 9, 1987, following an advertis,d public hearing, adopted Resolution No. 74-87 by 6 to 2 vote, recommending approval of the Master Development O Order for Downtown Miami hs attached hereto; and _ Cj a`vi VHEREAS, on December 10, 1987, the City Commission conducted a .public hearing pursua..t to F.S. 380.06 (1987) and WHEREAS, the City Commission considered the Application for Development Approval, the report and recommendations of the South Florida Regional Planning Council, and each element required to be considered by F.S. 380.06 (1987); and " 0 CITYATTI ^^ .......�.. ' i L E���� dam• �_� 1 VLa •li�:.'�lJv�� WHEREAS: the City C ssion determined thatallrequiremeo f notice and other legal requirements for the issuance of the proposed Master Development Order had been complied with; and WHEREAS, the City Commission deems it advisable and in the best interest of the.' general welfare of the City of Miami to issue a Master Development Order as Fereinafttr set forth; NOw, THEREFORE, BE .IT RESOLYED BY THE COW ISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1: The Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law are made with respect to the Project as described in the Master Development Order for Downtown Miami, which is attached hereto as.Exhibit "A" and made a part hereof by reference, and is applicable to .an area of the City of Miami under the Jurisdiction of the Downtown Development Authority with the exception of the Southeast Overtown/Park West Redevelopment District, as more particularly described in Exhibit "A". Section 2: The Master Development Order for Downtown Miami (Exhibit "A") is hereby granted and issued. Section 3. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to immediately send certified copies of this Resolution together with Exhibit "A" and copies of all exhibits, attachments, and' written materials, including portions of ordinances referenced in the text of the Master Development Order to: The Florida Department of Community Affairs, 2571 Executive Center Circle East, Tallahassee, Florida, 32301; The South Florida Regional Planning Council, 3440 Hollywood Boulevard, Suite 140, Hollywood, Florida, 33021; and the Downtown Development Authority; Suite 1800, One Biscayne Tower-, Miami, Florida 33132. Section 4. The City Manager is hereby directed to take all actions necessary to fulfill the City's obligations under the terms of the -Master Development Order. section 5. In the event that any portion or section of this Resolution or the Master Development Order for Downtown Miami (Exhibit "A") is determined to be invalid, illegal, or unconstitutional by a court, or agency of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall in no manner affect the remaining portions of this Resolution or the Master Development Order for Downtown Miami i (Exhibit "A"), which shall remain in full force and effect. U C Q� .A (DU LL O Cu O 0 c�1 - � E C PASSED AND ADOPTED this lOthday of December 1987. - XAV I ER =L. SUAREZ,' MAYOR ATTEST: or 1,111ATTY HIRAI, CITY CLERK PREPARED AND APPROVED BY: J L E. MAXWELL SISTANT CITY ATTORNEY APPROVED AS 0 FORM AND CORRECTNESS: CIA A. DOUGHER , CI,TY ATTORNEY v c �c C Q a U 0 co> o ' U ri) •C O C t. 10 3 C Master EXHIBIT "A" MASTER DEYELOPMENT ORDER NAME OF DEYELOPMENT:.,Downtown, Miami, NAME OF DEYELOPER: Downtown Development Authority of the City of Miami AUTHORIZED AGENT OF DEVELOPER: Roy F. Kenzie, Executive Director, Downtown Development Authority and Sergio Rodriguez, Director, City of Miami Planning Department, or their successors. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The Project consists of development in Downtown Miami through the Year 2007, including the following land uses and increments: Land Uses Increment I Increment II Increment III Totals Office (gross square feet) 71100,000 31600,000 - 36'700,000 14.400,000 Government Office (gross.square feet) 300,000 250,000 200,000 750,000 Retail/Service (gross square feet)- 1,d50,000 400,000 500,000 1,950,000 Hotel (rooms) 1,000 500 1,100 2,600 Residential (dwelling units) 3,550 .2,550 2,920 9,020 Convention (gross square feet) 500,000 0 0 500,000 Wholesale/Industrial (gross square feet) 1,050,000 0 1,050,000 2.100,000 Institutional (gross squarz feet) 300,000 0 300,000 600,000 Attractions/Recreation (seats) 3,400 11600 5,000 10,000 Pursuant to F.S. 380.06(22) (1987); the Project specifies the total amount of development planned for each land use category, but provides flexibility for such development to be located anywhere within the Project Area, subject to local land development regulations. The Project Area includes all property within the boundaries of the Downtown Development Authority, with the exception of that area between NE/NW 5th Street and I-395 known as "Park West% as illustrated on the map in Exhibit 1 and described in Exhibit 2 attached hereto. The Project Area contains a total of approximately 839 acres of land, including approximately 78 acres currently zoned and developed as .0 City parks. 1 0� C. a— U p L L +- Q oar• c � o U� �y .c O C0 v N OF SUBJEC PERTY: See Exhibit 2: LEGAL DESCRIPTION � ; DEFINITIONS: For the `purposes.:of this -Development Order, the following -.terms shalt be :defined as -follows: ADA or` Application for Development Approval: The original Application for Development Approval 'for Downtown Miami filed'by the DOA on November 25, 1986, pursuant to F.S. 380.06 (1987). CADA or Consolidated Application for. Development .Approval: The revised ADA prepared pursuant toyparagraph 21 on page 12 herein. Certificate of Occupancy: A permahent or tenporary and/or partial Certificate of Occupancy issued; pursuant t•o Section �07 of the South Florida Building Code, for any "Net New Development" as defined herein. City: The City of Miami, Florida. Council: The South Florida Regional Planning Council'. DDA or Downtown Development Authority: The Downtown Development Authority of the City of -Miami, Florida. DERM: The Metropolitan Dade County Department of Environmental Resources Management. �• V C DRI: Development of Regional Impact. C CL U Development Credits: The individual units of land uses included within Total LL a� U Allowable Development, as measured by squ;;re footage, or number of dwelling O c C: is r- O j O units, hotel rooms, or seats. MaJor Use Special Permit: - A special permit issued by the City Cocritssion — cy pursuant to Ordinance 9500, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Mtami, as (n amended. Net New Development: Any construction or reconstruction which will ,result in a net increase, within any "Parcel of Land % of residential dwelling units, hotel rooms, seats in attractions/recreation farilities or gross square footage for office, government office, retail/service, convention, �. i i J 2 wholesale/industrial or. titutionai uses. Lanu u. .., ' .demolition of a building 16tructure may be credited against.the proposed new land uses for purposes of calculating the net increase, if the Planning Director determines that there was a valid Certificate of Occupancy existing on the effective date of this Development Order for the land uses to be demolished. If h change of land use is proposed, the Planning Director may credit the prior land use against the proposed land use based upon e.quivalent _ impacts as measured by peak hour vehicle trip generation. Any activity which has on the effective date of this Developii._nt Order a valid building permit or any currently effective development order shall not be included as Net New Development. The Planning Director may exclude from Net New Development any small development' under 10,000 square feet!' in floor area; 'if - °he finds that no .n�►�.q��:,�1� such development would have impatt as measured by peak hour vehicle trips. A Parcel of Land: Any quantity of land' capable of being described with such definiteness that its location and boundaries may be established, and which is designated by its -owner or developer as -land -to be -used -or developed as a unit or which has been used or developed .as a.unit. Project: That Project described in the "PROJECT DESCRIPTION" on Page 1 herein. Project Area: The area included within the legal description in Exhibit 2. Total Allowable Development: The quantity of Net New Development for which v cri Certificates of Occupancy may be issued under the terms and conditions of this Q c U Development Order, together with any attendant Incremental Development Order,QD U U and as may be modified pursuant to F.S. 380.06(19) (1981). The City may P: v permit simultaneous increases and decreases between the land use categories, v� provided that the regional impacts of the land uses as changed will not exceed .c 9- the adverse regional impacts of the Project as originally approved, as E . measured b total Y peak hour vehicle trips. FINDINGS OF FACT: The following findings of fact are hereby confirmed and 'adopted with respect to the Project: 10 3 1- A The findings and de nations of fact set forth 1n the rec* of the resolution to this Development Order are hereby confirmed. B. The real property which is the .subject of this. Development Order is legally described in Exhibit 2. ' C. Tl v DOA filed ithe ADA with the City, the Council; and the Florida :Department of, Community. Affairs.... .. D. lThe ADA has been 'Ji-led by the DOA pursuant, to F.S. - 380.06 (22 ) .(1987 ) authorfzing•.a downtown •development• authority,.to apply for development ..approval ;and ... receive, a development order for -.any or: all of the area within *its jurisdiction.. Ind.ividual_.dewelopments are not identified .or required to..be identified in the CADA.. E. ..The purpose o'f -the CADA is to identify and.. -assess probable regional impacts .and to .obtain approval for Total -Allowable Development in < accordance with .the general guidelines set forth in this. Development Order -and the CADA. The..concept is to recognize the Project Area as a single area of high •intensity development aild to focus the DRI review process primarily on the impacts that Total Allowable Development within the area will, have on land, water, transportation, environmental, community services, energy and other. resources and systems of regional significance. The CADA seeks a single DRI review process for overall phased development of the downtown area rather than requiring each individual DRI scale development within -the downtown area to 'file for v separate DRI reviews. U F. Development within .the Project Area is expected to continue to be Q c •0 0 LL U accomplished over an extended period of time by a variety of developers, a which may include the City. These developers may retp.ond to market C O v1- demand and technologies that can only be estimated in the CADA. The CADA and the DO are intended to serve as flexible guides for .ta planned development of the Project Area rather than a precise blueprint for its o E CO development. Therefore, pursuant to F.S. 380.06(21)(b) (1987),' the CADA seeks master development approval for three increments of development over a period of approximately twenty years and specifics development approval for Increment I, which is the first phase of development projected for a period of approximately five years. Subsequent i incremental applications may need to be adjusted to more nearly serve as �• 4 i a living -guide I gnizing the volution of marxeL .•a�� • technologies G. The Project Area contains a total of approziinately 839 acres, -including approximately '78 acres presently zoned and. developed as City parks. The CADA proposes Net New Development within the Project Area for the land uses, quantities and' phases defined herein as Total `Allowable Development. — H. The Project it not located in an area of critical state concern as designated°pursuant ,to. F.S. 380-.(1987). I. A comprehensive review of the probable impacts that will be generated,by ,.the Project has been, conducted by,various City departments, as.reflected i,n the CADA, .and ;the South Florida Regional Planning Council staff. J. This Development Order is consistent with the report and recommendations of the South Florida Regional Planning Council'. entitled "Development of Regional Impact Assessment for Downtown Miami - Master", dated October 5, 1987: The South Florida Regional Planning Council recommends approval• of the Project, and all conditions to which such approval is subject are reflected herein. K. The Project is consistent with the applicable portion of the State land development plan and the Regional Plar for South Florida. , L. The Project is in conformity with the adopted Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan. M. • The Project is in accord with the district zoning classifications of U � C , Zoning Ordinance 9500, as amended. Q C C U a� .p U N. The Project will have a favorable impact on the economy of the City. a`_ U a� �D P. The Project will efficiently use public transportation facilities. Q. The Project will favorably affect the need for people to find adequate a U housing reasonably accessible to their places of employment. R. The Project will efficiently use necessary public facilities. C S. s The Project will include adequate mitigative measures to assure that it C/5 will not adversely effect the environment and natural resources of the City. T. The Project will not adversely affect living conditions in the City. U. The Project will, not adversely affect public safety. V. There is aApublic need for the Project. i - O 5 O 'CONCLUSIONS-. OF LAW: That. -having made the findings of fact contained above; the City Commission hereby concludes as a matt er-of law, the following: A. :She. DDA-• constitutes ca "downtown developmentauthority" as defined in FA.-' 380 '(1987). and is authorized by F.S. 380 (1987) to make application for development approval and receive a development order. B. The Project complies with the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan, is consistent with the orderly development and goals of the City of Miami, and complies with local land .develo{xent•regulations. C. The Project does not unreasonably interfere with the achievement of the objectives of the adopted State land development plan applicable to the City of Miami or the Regional Plan for South Florida. D. The Project is consistent with the report and recommendations of the South Florida Regional Planning Council and does not unreasonably interfere with any•.of the considerations and objectives set forth in F.S. 380• (.19871. E., Changes in the Project which do not exceed the Total Allowable Development or which do not result in a net reduction of more than S percent in total acreage zoned and .developed as City parks, shall not constitute a substantial deviation under F.S. 380 (1987). ACTION TAKEN: _ C U e c Q) That, having made the findings of fact and reached the conclusions of `� LL law set forth above, it is ordered that the Project is hereby approved; o r_ o CU subject to the following conditions: v� THE CITY, ITS SUCCESSORS, AND/OR ASSIGNS JOINTLY OR SEVERALLY MAY .ISSUE _ Q BUILDING PERMITS AND CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY FOR NET NEW DEVELOPMENT Qo E (J) 1 n? PURSUANT TO AN APPROVED DEVELOPMENT ORDER FOR EACH INCREMENT DESCRIBED HEREIN AND SHALL: 1. Require all development pursuant to this Development Ordef to be in accordance with applicable building codes, land development regulations; ordinances and other laws. 10 10 I _ �. •iw�n o uwnu�s � • '=•and 'tmplement -a unj& ordinance'that incorporates a requtment that --Net lNew Developments shall mulch, spray or plant grass in exposed areas to prevent soil=<erosion and minimize air pollution during construction. 3.• Within 6 months of the effective date of this Development Order; adopt and .implement a uniform ordinance that incorporates a requirement that Net New Developments shall place tern:orary screens; berms, and/or rip - .rap around sites' °under construction to filter or retain storm ater . runoff during,constructidn.' 4. Within 6 months of the effective date this Development Order, adopt and implement a uniform ordinance .or establish an accepted procedure to require Net New Developments to design; construct and maintain stormwater management systems to,meet the following standards: a. Retain the runoff from at least a 5-year storm on each Parcel of Land wherever feasible and construct drainage systems as proposed in the Consolidated Application for Development Approval (CADA). Consistent with the CADA, individual drainage systems must be designed to retain at least the first one -inch of stormwater runoff within drainage wells and exfiltration trenches. b. Install pollutant retardant structures (catch basin with down -turned inlet pipe or other Dade County DERM-approved device) v W L� 5 C _N to treat all stormwater runoff at each individual drainage C: o U .o LL structure and/or well, and periodically remove pollutant � . " U accumulations. v c o � U C. Limit application of pesticides and fertilizers in vegetated storm a C� w, water retention areas to once per year for preventive maintenance and to emergencies, such as uncontrolled insect infestation. (D d. V-cuum sweep all parking lots of eleven or more vehicle spaces and private roadways serving the parking lots at least once per week. e. Both during and following construction, prevent the direct flow of stormwater runoff that has not been pre-treated pursuant to Conddtj on 4a. above) into surface waters. 7 Q. ,5. - Require Net 'New Devel'6pment to comply with Dade County hazardous waste requirements by the adoption and impi:mentation of a uniform ordinance, as may -be found by the City to be c plicable and necessary, providing for hazardous materials .accident prevention, mitigation' and response standards, as described in a. through h. .below. These -standards shall ..be maintained. _ by .i.ndiyidual , developers who shall -require by_ lease agreement or building rule that all tenants classified by a SIC code listed in Appendix 12A-8 of the CADA; incorporated herein by reference; that use, handle,. store; display; or generate hazardous materials (materials that are ignitable; corrosive* toxic; or reactive); including those identified on page 6 of Appendix 12A-8 of the CADA comply with these standards; provided however, that the uses in and the, wastes listed in Appendix 12A-8 of the CADA shall be simultaneously amended upon the addition or. deletion of any or all of the listed uses, materials, or wastes by amendment to the "County and Regional Hazardous Waste Assessment Guidelines" incorpurated by Rule 17-31.03(2); Florida Administrative Code. At a minimum, these standards shall: a.Require that buildings or portions of buildings where hazardous materials or hazardous wastes, as defined above, are to be used, displayed, handled, generated, or stored shall be constrycted with impervious floors, without drains, to ensure containment and v c �E� facilitate cleanup of any spill or leakage. a c ( U m .0 U L U b. Prohibit any outside storage of hazardous materials or hazardous p c- r- <U waste. The exception to .this condition is for retail goods c o o U typically associated with residential nursery activity, such as , c� lawn fertilizers and garden pesticides. Those areas used For the storage of these goods are subject to the requirement contained in c Condition 5c. below. C. Require that any area used for loading and/or unloading of hazardous material be covered and equipped with a- collection system to contain leakage and accidental spills. i1 1 8 d. Require all ha us waste generators to conL.act withcensed D ublic or private :hazardous waste disposal service or processing facility and provide, Dade County DERM copies of the following forms of documentation or proper hazardous waste management practices: a•h4zardous waste manifest; a thipment'to a permitted hazardous waste management facility; — or a confirmation of receipt of materials from a recycl er or a waste exchange operation.. e. Prohibit generation of hazardous effluents;- unless adequate facilities, approved by Dade County DERM and Florida Department of Environmental Regulation, are constructed and used by tenants .generating such effluents. . f. Dispose of hazardous sludge material; generated by effluent pre-treatment in a. manner approved by the Federal Environmental Protection Agency and the Florida Department of -Environmental Regulation. g. Notify any tenant generating wastes of the penalties for improper disposal of hazardous waste pursuant to F.S. 403.727. 1. U h. Allow reasonable access to facilities for monitoring by Dade ca U County DERM, Council staff, and the Florida Department of a cv LL 5 W U Environmental Regulation to assure compliance with this 0 - o = r ca Development Order and all applicable laws and regulations. o 6. Enact an ordinance requiring Net New Development to remove all invasive C 'v exotic plants, including Melaleuca; Casuarina, and Brasilian Pepper,°° o from their Parcel of Land as the parcel is cleared; and use only those plant species i denti f` ed in Appendix 8-4 of the CADA for landscaping. Additional species may be used only if written approval is provided by Council staff. Such approval will be based on the species under consideration meeting the following criteria: a. does,4ngt require excessive irrigation 9 b. does,:not:re;., xcessive .fertili.zer.appli,. .ion •. . ' c: is;not:prone to•sect infestation .or:o:ther pests d. is not prone to disease e. does not have invasive root systems - f. such other criteria a's may be appropriate 7. Cooedinate•':w:ith,';..approp,r-i'ate::-;agencies-, .to ensure. :that those areas frequented ,by. the, hest Indian; manatee; and Brown .pelican- are properly. identified •.to .-reduce the -impact of development_ on these species. Measures may include, but are not limited to; warning signs$ idle speed zones, etc: Provide information to developments located adjacent to the Miami River or Biscayne• Bay which may adversely impact these species, which shall be ^distributed by the developer to users of the development. This information should include, but is not to be limited to; pamphlets and signs on .frequency of-si-te use, --man-induced adverse impacts, and measures to avoid these impacts. B. Direct. the -City Manager to establish procedures .whereby the Police Department and Fire Department shall make recommendations to incorporate security measures.into the design and operation of Net New Development. 9. Collaborate with the Dade County School Board, by providing planning information and information on Net New Development of residential units, to address concerns regarding the availability and access to schools for V C LC students from future residential development within the project area. C e U 10. Encourage the incorporation of energy conservation measures into the _� V design _O O r v co and operation of Net New Development by requiring that, at a C o minimum, all Net New Development shall be constructed in conformance U .v • e� with the specifications of the State of Florida Energy Efficiency Code - o for Building Construction (State Energy Code). Q 11. As part of the building permit application., prior to approving -any activity involving rehabilitation, demolition, or structural, changes to historic buildings listed in Exhibit 3 herein, require the applicant to submit to the Florida Department of State Division of Archives, History, and Records Management and the City of Miami Planning Department photographs /of the structure and a description of proposed activities �.•� I 10 Q to .�approv:ing.-.any p t for ground .disturbing activitie0ated to construction or.,tree . removal .within the- archaeological .zones listed in Exhibit-,•4 herein,, require,. 'the, -applicant to .contact these same. two agencies to,;make ,arrangements to survey and. assess .the area. This coAd.ition' wi•]1; -not apply, ,to those historic buildings and archeological zones that.are designated as Heritage Conservation districts pursuant to paragraph 12 below. 12. Attempt ,to have „al;l.properties and ,archaeological zones in Exhibits 3 and.4._.he,rein:desi-gnated as Heritage Conservation districts under'Article 16.of.Zoning Ordinance-9500, the. Zoning Ordinance of'the City of Miami, Florida, as amended. 13. For all development activity, other than development .on sites contained in Exhibits 3 and 4 herein (since these sites are subject to Condition 11...and 12. above), :as .part of_ the building --permit application require the applicant, pursuant to .state law, to notify the Florida Department of State 'Division. of Archives, History and Records Management of construction 'schedules, and where pptentially significant historical or archaeological artifacts are uncovered during construction, permit State and Iota l archeological officials to survey and excavate the 'site. When required by law, delay construction for up to 3 months in any portion of the construction site necessary to permit the archeological survey and excavation to be completed. 14. Monitor development and redevelopment activities to ensure that there is no net loss of low-income housing opportunities within the City of Miami.• Any net loss of such units within the Project Area shall be counterbalanced by a gain in another area within the City of Miami. is. Withhold the issuance'of building permits for Net New Development that cannot obtain a letter of availability from the appropriate agency that wastewater treatment capacity will be sufficient to meet theneedsof that development. 16. Withhold the issuance of building permits for Net New Development that cannot obtain a letter of availability from the appropriate agency that 11 _ G N U CL 0 LL (D U C O U 01_ 6 E ft 17. 18. an adequate water w111 De avalIau,Ie development. 41 thhol d' ;th e issuance of -building permits •'for,:Net,;New Development.. -that Cannot obtain a letter of availability :from the appropriate. agency: that solWwaste disposal' capacity kwil•l be�suffici_ent to meet ::the: needs- of w.,that• development. Have the authority to assess, development for its proportionate share of .the costs of improvements' and/or services necessary to monitor and/or mitigate any adverse impacts. The City shall also have authority to assess development its proportionate share::of:the',costs attributable to preparation of, the master plan for":downtown, the ;Application for Development Approval' -,and this Development Order; -'as well 'as the future costs of reviewing ^individual, -development applications, - monitoring compliance with -this Development Order, and any other costs reasonably related -to the administration and implementation -of this Development Order. "If necessary, the City shall establish a procedure for rebating any funds collected in excess of "those funds attributable to a particular development and necessary -to implement this Development Order or any ordinance or procedure required to monitor and enforce compliance with this Development Order and to mitigate the impacts of Total Allowable Development. ca U C N H NITDRING, REPORTING, AND ERFORCDIF-HT: CL U m .�? LL 19. The City shall monitor the capacity of Total Allowable Development by _� U U O [= U N reserving the amount of Development Credits necessary for Net New o U Development at a time, to be determined by the City, prior to or U ,c coincident with approval of a building permit or Major Use .Special _ .2 permit. The City shall place reasonable time limits on all building = o E _ C/) a) permits and Major Use Special Permits to assure that construction progresses within a reasonable period of time after approval to prevent stockpiling of reservations for Development Credits. The time period established by the City shall take into account the size of the proposed Net New Development in relationship to the time necessary to begin construction. 10 12 420. Upon the issuance Certificate of Occupancy for ant New Development, the City yshal1 .make appropriate subtractions from the amount of Total Allowable Development under this Development Order. No Certificates of. Occupancy shall be issued for Net New Development which wou`ra, in' .'the aggregate, exceed the amount of Total Allowable Development under this Development Order. — 21. The City shall .integrate all original and supplemental ADA information into .a Consolidated Application for Development Approval (CADA) and submit two copies of the CADA to the Council; .one copy _to.the City Clerk, and one copy'to •the Florida Department of Community Affairs within thirty (30) days of the effective date of this -Development Order. The-CADA shall be prepared as follows: a. Where new, clarified, or f revised information was prepared subsequent .to submittal of the ADA but prior to issuance of this Development Order, whether in response' to a formal statement of information needed or otherwise, the original pages of the ADA will be replaced with revised pages. b. Revised pages will have a "Page Number (R) - Date" notation, with "Page Number" being the number of the original page, ."(R)" indicating that the page was revised, and "Date" statingt•the date V i• C -�cri of the revision. Q U c o 22. The Consolidated Application for Development Approval is incorporated c: U herein by reference and will be relied upon by the parties in o cb � � discharging their statutory duties under F.S. 380 (1987), and local c v� ordinances. Substantial compliance with the factual representations . _ P contained in the Consolidated Application for Development Approval is a = o condition for approvaf unless waived or modified by agreement aplong the Council, City, and Applicant, its successors, and/or assigns. 23. All terms, proposals, suggestions and procedures proposed in the Application for Development Approval; but not specifically incorporated in this Development Order, shall not be considered a cart of the Con solidateOAApplication for Development Approval insofar as they may 13 have been deemed tf- 1 a requirement --on -utir .���� ,�. .•..•• _.., action or absta'i`n frAking :any -action. The >terms of this lopment Order shall =control` and. any •requ,trements-o.f the 'City are specifically .enumerated herein: 24'.` . The. --following., :regional issues. -as . they appear in the Consolidated Application•forDevelopment`Approv:al have been sufficiently reviewed for the total Project extending .through 'the _yea' 2007) and. shall not be required -to .be- reviewed --as each 'incremental portion .of the Downtown Miami DRI is :su.imittedc Maps: -Map A -.Location ' - _ ,Maps. B-1, -B--2, B-3, B-4 —Aerial :Photo(s) - Map C-5 - Flood Zones -- Map D-1 - Existing Land Use -Map E - Solis Map F - vegetation .Maps G-1. G-Z.- Drainage Maps.I-1; I-2, I-3. I-4 - Public Facilities Question 5: Water Quality Question.6: Wetlands - Question 7: Flood Prone Areas Question B: vegetation and Wildlife cfj E -Question 9: Historical and Archaeological Sites (D *� Question 12: Other Public Facilities 0 C a: c CU C. Energy c� 0. Education - E. Recreatioh and Open Space 0 C/) T ? - Question 13: Housing 25. The following regional issues as they appear in the }Consolidated Application for Development Approval have not been sufficiently reviewed for the total Project (extending through the year 2007) and, as appropriate,,will be required to be reviewed as each incremental portion of the Downtown Miami DRI is submitted: 14 C Question 1: Applicant Tfiformation" Maps: Map H - Master.Deve.lopment Maps J series-.Transportation:.:twork Disp lay Graphics.and,Boards. Question 3: Project Description Question 4: .Air Quality Question 10: Employment and Economic Characteristics Question 11: Transportation Question 12: Other Public Facilities A. Wastewater, hater, and solid Waste B. Health Care, Police, and Fire 26. Grounds for denial .by the South Florida Regional Planning Council of any subsequent- applications for an incremental. portion of this proposed development will .be limited to any unresolved issues .pertaining to Question 4: Air Quality and/or Question 11: Transportation. 27. The City shall prepare an annual report and submit copies to the Council, the City Clerk and Florida Department of Community Affairs on or before each anniversary date of this Development Order. As each development increment receives a Development Order, the annual report shall include the development covered by the incremental Development Order so that a single annual report is compiled for the entire Project. The annual report shall include, at a minimum: a. A complete response to each question in Exhibit 5. b. Identification and description of any known changes in the^plan of development, or in the representations contained in the CADA, or in the phasing for the reporting year and for the next year. C. A summary comparison of Total Allowable Development and Net New Development proposed and actually approved during the year, i including locations, acreage, square footage, number of units, and 15 U � C E _O c Q) U a) U- m U O O r N O U o C/) .� other unity land uses included -wicnln Totallowable Development; and the acreage zoned and developed as City parks. d: An' assessment of the Appl_icant's and the. Gity's compliance with the conditions of approval contained;in this Development Order and the —commitments which :are -contained in the -Application for Development Approval and which have been -identified by --the -City, the Council', or .the Department of 'Community 'Affairs as being significant. e. Specification of any known incremental or amended,DRI applications for development approval or requests for .a substantial deviation determination -that were filed in the reporti.ng year or to be. filed during the next year. f. An indication of change, if any, in City jurisdiction for any portion of 'the development since issuance of this Development Order. 9. A statement that all persons have been sent copies of the annual report in conformance with F.S'. 380.06(18) (1987). h. A copy of any recorded notice of the adoption of this Development Order or any subsequent' modification that was recorded by the Applicant pursuant to F.S. 380.06(15) (1987). ^ cry zK � � U i. A report from DERM of any known violations of the hazardous waste (D .q U_ (D U requirements contained in paragraph 5 herein. U J. The number of low -incoming housing units lost from demolition and o _ v� �v .c " conversion within the Project Area, as well as the total number of . - F o new Tow income housing units within the City. _ 00 k. Any other information required by the Department of Community Affairs (DCA) in accordance with F.S. 380.06(18)(1987). 28. The City shall enforce the requirements of the Dade County ,Shoreline Development Review Ordinance (85-14) for all subsequent developments within the Shoreline Development boundary. /1 16 deveio menz snag .,� �"� � �irui,r cing anY; P ty. lhe. ceadl.ine.Aor oh, elo eat order. The terminatdate for • the.tffecti:ve date5..Dev pm completing development ;shall -be December 31; 2007, provided that the Applicanti,..or its successos,and,.assigns. :complies with paragraph 34 herer'n The termination. date :may only be modified in accordance with F.S..'380 06C19)(c) (1982: 30. The effective date of this Development Order shall be 45 days` from its aransm'ittai'ao the,:Flocida.Department of Community Affairs; Council,.and Applicant;`. prov;i.ded,..hoyever; that if this Development Order is appealed, the;:: effective date. will' -not ,'start until :the day after all appeals have -been withdrawn -or rasol_ved .pursuant. -to F.S. 380.07(2) (1-987). 31. The Ci.ty..sha11 not violate-any,.of the. conditions of this Development Order or-, otherwi se. fa'i.l —to . _act : in substantial compliance with this Development Order or permit any 'property owner within the boundaries covered by this Development Order to violate any of the provisions of this Development Order. In, the event any entity controlled by the Applicant -and/or the City or any perm, ittee or landowner of any Parcel of Land violates (hereinafter "violator") the provisions of this Development Order, the City shall stay the effectiveness of this Development Order as to the Parcel of Land, in which the :uiolative _ ,. activity or conduct has occurred and withhold further permits, E U approvals, and services for development in said Parcel of Land, upon W .0 U_ U passage of any appropriate resolutijn by the City, adopted in accordance o � r- � with this section, finding that such violation has occurred. The violator will be given written notice by the City that states: 1) the nature of the purported violation, and 2) that unless the violation is cured within 30 days of said notice, the City will hold a public hearing to to consider the matter within 60 days of the date of said notice. In the event the violation is not curable in 30 days, the violator's diligent good faith efforts, as determined by the City, to.cure the violation within that period will obviate the need to hold a public hearing and this Development Order will remain in full force and effect m unless the violator does not diligently pursue the curative action to 17 completion- w;ithi'n a ruble `titne.:.:�n:xti.ch event the City give 15 .days notice to; the, v i olatar of 'its intention to stay the effectivenessof '.this "be velo'ment.,Order%and withhold further permits, approvals, `and services to: the Parcel==-o,f Land in which the violation has occurred and until the;violatian is `.cured. The terms of this_.paragraph may -be modifi.gd from tame, to time by=;~wriJtten agreement by the DDA, the City:,' -and Countil, staff_, _:to'_enatil:e the City to enforce the terms, of this Development. -Order "to. the` full-esL extent, -while providing due process to all Developers under.::.this:Development Order. 32 The Planning Direc.--tor, _Ctty' of Miami 'Planning .Department, is,... hereby designated to monitor°.compli ance,.wi.th`,all conditions of thi's-Development Order andshall.have the: duty and authority to interpret the -provisions of this Development Order and to promulgate rulings, regulations and procedures --necessary to implement it, provided the same are not inconsistent with the- terms. hereof or of F.S. 380 (1987). or duly promulgated and adopted rules thereunder. Appeals to decisions of the Planning Director may be filed pursuant to procedures set forth in Article'30 of Ordinance 9500, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended. Apy noncompliance shall be subject to the prov.isions of paragraph 31 herein. 33. The South Florida Regional Planning Council DRI report and recomnendati.ons, entitled "Development of Regional Impact Assessment for Downtown Miami - Master", dated October 5, 1987, is incorporated herein by reference. 34. Within 30 days of the effective date of this Development Order, it shall be recorded with the Clerk,. Dade County Circuit Court, pursuant to F.S. 380.06(15) (1987), specifying that the Development Order runs with the land and is binding on the Applicant, its successors, and/or.2ssigns, Jointly or severally. 35. The existence of this Development Order shall not act to, limit or proscribe the rights of any person under F.S. 380 (1987) to file an Application for evelopment Approval and obtain an individual development or for property covered by this Development Order, not U Q 0 L +. L Q) o c 0 c 0 .c �. 0 Cl) W a 18 � 40. Upon the adoption of the local government comprehensive plan pursuant to F.S. 163.3161 (1985), as amended, for the City of Miami, the City may rescind this Master Development C..-er at the completion of the first increment,in the event that the Cit), after a public hearing, deems such action is in.the best interest of the City. I N IFN {r--,L7 FLAGLEA ST if II •I� N.W. ;, ST. Tf Ci��ilC.0 I m 'W �.?•r :ice-r E N.W. S sT. �(� II• I,m O I IL U�\-- ..—i - I n C I I • �J�UI - �CDCC�., II •�� Gl -- i ^—lei I I cm 9 Y I I I �I 11 —tom I I I i CC I . r CJ r DOWNTOWN MIAIMI DRI BOUNDARY MAP to -A c: -Lr ctt �U CO c p C O. o E co (D a) LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF* ECT PROPERTY: - Begin at the intersection of the centerlines of N.W. 5th Street and N.W. 3rd Avenue (east side of N-S Expressway (I-95)), said point of beginning also being the. N.W. corner of the district; thence run southerly-4long the center line of N.W. 3rd Avenue and the easterly side of the N-S•Expressway to the centerline. of West Flagler Street; thence westerly along the centerline of said West Flagler Street :to the centerline of the Miami River; thence meandering southeasterly along -the centerline of said Miami River to a point of intersection with the easterly right-of-way (R/W) line of Metro Rapid Transit R/W (formerly Florida East Coast (FEC) Railroad R/W) said R/W line being 50 feet' easterly of and parallel with the centerline of said Metro Rapid Transit R/W; thence run southerly and southwesterly along said easterly R/W line of Metro Rapid Transit to the intersection with the centerline of S.W. 15th Road; .thence southeasterly along the centerline of loth Road to a poi nt.of intersection with the southerly prolongation of the westerly line of• COSTA BELLA DEVELOPMENT SUBDIVISION .(107-14); thence• northeasterly, northwesterly. and northeasterly along said westerly line of 'COSTA BELLA to the intersection with the southerly right-of-way line of S.E. 14th Lane; thence southeasterly, northeasterly. northerly, and northwesterly along said southerly and westerly right-of-way line of S.E. 14th Lane and S.E. 14th Terrace to the intersection frith the v northwesterly property line of Lot 31 Block 2 of Amended Plat of POINTLL U YIEW as recorded in Plat Book 2 at Page 93 of the Public Records of Dade '0 County, Florida; thence northeasterly along the northwesterly line of O C C: co � � U said Lot 31 to the northeasterly side of the existing tdn foot alley in v� a � Block 2 of .said POINT_,YIEW; thence southeasterly along the northeasterly side of said ten foot alley to the intersection with the property line apE between Lots 4 and 5 of said Block 2 of POINT .VIEW; thence northeasterly along said line of Lots 4 and 5 and its prolongation thereof to the centerline of S.E. 14 th Street; thence southeasterly Tong said centerline of S.E. 14th Street to a point of intersection with the existing bulkhead .and shoreline of Biscayne Bay; thence meandering northerly along the existing bulkhead and shoreline of Biscayne Bay to a point of intersection with the southerly boundary of Claughton Island !� 1 21 Inland Bridge to Apntersection with .the westerly bu.line' of Claughton Island, said bulkhead line being part of the Metropolitan Dade County Bulkhead Line as recorded in Plat Book 73 at Page 18 of the Public Records; thence -southerly; •easterly, northerly Wand westerly, following,,aaidexi.sting.bu.lkhead and its.:,westerly.,prolongati"on ,thereof around the ;filand to ;.the intersection -w, th the:,mai,nland on the easterly shoreline of .•Biscayne Bay;-ttienc6" meander-ing..in. a northwesterly, and westerly .di,rection"along the, shoreline of :Biscayne ,Bay and the Miami River to.;the:_.intersection with the easterly R/W l6e,of Brickell Avenue Bridge =( S E:` In' d Avenue) `, thence north along said bridge to the existing bulkhead ,on'.the northerly `shorel6e, of the Miami .Ri,`ver; said bulk line also being the southerly boundary of *,the Duoont';Plaza Center and Miami Center Joint Venture property; thence. northeasterly along the southerly boundary of. Dupont Plaza Center and Miami Center Joint Venture property to a point of intersection with the easterly property line of Chopin Associates and Miami Center Limited Partnership; :said property line being 'along the shoreline of Biscayne Bay;.thence 'northerly along said.. easterly property line of Chopin Associates and Miami Center Limited Partnership property along -Biscayne Bay to the southerly property line Of 'Bayfront 'Park; thence continuing northerly. northeasterly and northwesterly along the bulkhead line.of Bayfront Park and the Bayfront Park Miamarina.; thence continuing northerly along the bulkhead"line of C � t _N Biscayne Bay to a point of intersection with the centerline of N.E. 17th C: U. o Street extended. easterly; thence westerly along the centerline of � U N.E. 17th Street and its extension thereof to the easterly R/W line of o a a co C p the FEC Railroad; thence southerly along the easterly R/W line of the v� a c FEC Railroad to the limited access right-of-way of .I-395; thence southeasterly and easterly along the limited accessright-of-Nay of j .0o I-395 to the centerline of Biscayne Boulevard, thence southerj,y along the centerline of Biscayne Boulevard to the centerline of. N.E. '5th Street, thence westerly along the centerline and N.E. and N.W. 5th Street to the point of beginning. The above described area contains approximately 839 acres. b 22 . PW7� LLT= IN ON POTIQTTXIT ELIrJ%U Ri nit mriamAL xxux T1 or NTSTD[SC PLA= e=m ®Ic low cae�r 1. 1■ I,- •-L- 1. !a• ■laure rle•.... r•\a•as. w.41 Iw\ •••T..a. 11. IY t. t. 1 1N..\ re.•Vu. VII•Iq !, W 11•u.� •.•.Iw.r. tea ••a •Yt... il• ll1 1. f. 1 1.�� (�v.la MI.1•e \, 01 W.w s-\ww• /.�� 1..� ��S 11. 11 1. f. 1 I.r.• Il.l..r •.11 tl ere {. loon rlaf.l� -Iww L /�, ■.r.b r i% lox a. ■. f, 1 lour. [.- [Iew• br •.•�..I 1. IN1 Ilaaw.. •�In.•w Ibaev M1t1ey ad 1. U. tG t. E. [ Itw.\ ••w1 IIN [•tY.. 1, WI Inn•n •.�. r..eal r....... la. a B. A. 11v.+a too lll-.. W111• ....• I. •a 1no1\ •..� nwa Lw..ao..r c.•r.. 11. n ■. ■. { t.... t•ivu- t.�, 1, IY 1. nwl.. \aww •16w 1. fie..• I.I M..1 ![. 10, N. LA. U. >< t. 1. [ - 1..-a..a ra IbMa ■� 16. III 1. I'iMM. /ar..t Y11el.e. Irr. •.. rl++.. r.l \•I.r 1\/pr6 !Iw•a Il. 11Y {, C. LL Tw.r r.. Jr• J•ersa- exams LL. 1'YY (. ►twl.. tew•. Y•\pee�e 71. 11 [. ■. U ltr.•. twlar 41r.1 LL. .11 t.'Il•NN Ib..a .Lla■ Iri. K W T. ua ■. (. ll Iv.•a Tnna lIl •...•1 co• Ll,• 11 V. n"&- /'Y..t '-' (_ 4.+s.. SUL"am Y. [. II•rIN 1er.•a. a.L. I Oe•�r .Il..n [�te•1 r .- to" -.1 /aw•� •. .1- •.�� tllt•nt Il all'aR 14. •.l r! r, nY. •.ere Ira1M II•.. r.11 1.11• 11M.14 11. Ilfi r. n•� ..�� Chase• •a- W --to "C...'Jpw;l 1 Il. Ie■1 ■. In aw •s Ilw IYnN K 1 I/. ILIYI 1. M- h-r 11. IGS7 1. .1•w •�� Ilw IY V- .•. • la�.ay. a.•I�.rp 1111,001lod YV-•1 ■IP.4�. IIIM a Yalrl aM••.. •••aw1Yt1•• N .11116111 tT 11. IIY !. .11- •.� YIIN.., ■.wrw a...• - Oa4 . LIO ■t .1- •laent !1 \• 1 tar l01 !. 1. l •.r. old 9.1. Ilwa Yltla• Ir T tr•.. ■.al.l.r a. la ■. L. ! •..... .•11. r.11d1- U. Im 1. L. 1 •..� Y.L. r«\ g11ta. W � 1a, {ar ■. 1. 1 •..+ 11. LL1141 1. 1, l •wa • f-�- I-1 ■ral■t L'..rw.g. 1....a0. ls- 00[ t1l ■. L. 1 ltr+.a +ry+aw •.l uley n. t1. lil A. L. t (Iran tlq Y'•a�e•1 Ir M N1ty t)..a■ INe�- ••e• ..uuar� K Y�u•oa•a, wr M Yba ■a F�w■.Asr• M• Jd•era a [A.�.1�.•1 inwab•-0 Ca oovo� a.[ MAP D-2 HISTORICAL SITES I DOWNTOWN MACSTERPLAN i I DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT Oael O.Y /to" mt aclUclooft .,C.p i a� .© LL v U Q) .. o C a .s O ry .IBC.. o E co (D v •1 i j.0 i ►� � . ANC 1M=CAL ZLSS 1. I16eA3rM Area»Igtcal I*" 2. Dusen Arcatel"Acal Lam Z. Wrld Trod* Caren ArdnllglCal Za" t. 44..Aa ArewralNlcal ter S. fwt Dallas Arcaralgfcal Lam i. Yartf Mat A►cattl"fcal for ' Z. Irlceall Arcwolottcal Lana 2. Irlatall ►art Arcrwlq/cal lam f f !. Graf ytn. an CJurca ArcfraJgfcal for 10. smct Nwt Arc+wthlul tar 11. raac 240 Arcwlgfcal Iar Ow/ /�.w� M •Ia�+�► R a�r4 IW1a Ina •an R Maal�w�r ar ar�rw rd 4w�wr� ar.r....r fw�� R f MAP 0-3 ARCHEOLOGICAL ZONES DOWNTOWN MASTERPLAN DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT Y7 cc� v O C r U>� <ll C � U � co Exhibl Page 1 STATE OF FLORIDA.: j BLWW—.Oi-55 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS DIVISION OF-. RESOURCE PLANNING ANO.MANAGEMENT;. BUREAU OF LAND AND WATER MANAGEMENT 2571 Executive —Center Circle, Ea$T Tallenassee. Florida 32301-8244 (904) 488-4925 Subsection 380.06(16), Florida Statutes, pieces The responsibility on the developer of an approved development of regional Impact (DRI) for submitting an annual report to the local government. The Regional Planning Council The Department of Community Affairs,'and to all affeered pern(it agencies, on The date specified"ln the Development Order, The failure of a developer 10 submit the reoor-t on The -date specified in The development order may result In the Temporary suspension of the development order by the local eovernment until the annual reoc rr is submit•Ted To The review agencies.' This reouir"enT acalles To all aevelocmenTS of regions) imoacT which have peen aoprovea since AucUST 6. 1980. If you have any cuesTlons about Thls reeuirea reoorr, call The DRI Enforcement CoorolnaTcr a-r, (9,')4) 488-4925. Please send The original ccmoletea annual reocrr To the aesic6atea local covernmenT official sTatea in The eeveloomenT order with (1) CODY To eacn of The followinc:• a) The regional :)amine agency of jurlsdicTion: b) All affectea ptrmitting aavncies: c) Devision of Resource Planning and ManaaemenT Bureau of Land and Water Management 2371 Executive Center Circle. £asT Tallahassee, Florida 32301 Please format your Annual STtTus Repot. after The fCrmaT example :rovided below. ANNUAL STATUS RETORT Reporting Period: to NanthJDay/tear Montrri0ayirear Development: e• Name o: DAI ' Location: TY I CounTV Developer: Name: b Jazany name Address: Street LO:aTlOn U C LY CQ) U C- (D L U O !r U r 61 _ •O '•� O ..ity, .rate, —i.) l:o:e ' 67 Ex hfb�t .S Page 2 BLWM-07-85 Page Two 1) Describe any changes made in'tne pF'Oooied-Dlan Of developmenT, phasing, or In The rebresentaTlons ccnTalnea In the AppLl.caTlon for Development Approval since the DeveloznenT of Regional Impact received aooroval. Please note any acrlons (substantlal determinations) Takdn,by local government To address' these changes. Note: If a resoonse Is To be more Than one sentence, attach as Exhibit 'A'=a daTalled description of each chance and copies of The modified site plan drawings. Exhibit W. should also address The following additional Items if applicable. a) -Describe chances in the plan of development or phasing for the repor-ring year and for the subsequent years; b) State any known incremental DRI ae=llcaTlcns for develozmenT anorevai or recuesTs for a_suosTanTial deviation determiriaTlon that were filed in the rezorTino year and To be filed c�jring The next year; c) Attach a cozy of eny noTlce of the ade=Tlon of•a develoomenT order or The :ubseauenT modlficaTlon of an,. U adooTic develezmenT order That was reccrded by the :3 \ C develozer pursuant Tc SutsecTlon 3°_0.05(14)(d), F.S. EU 2) Has There been a cnanoe in local covernmenT jurlsdicTlon 0 LL for qny portion of the CeveloomenT Since The develoomenT order U U Wei issued? If so, has The annexing local covernmenT adorted a new DeveloomenT of Reaional Imoact develoomenT order for the � W= p project? Please provide a cony of the order adozTod by rthe V annexing local covernmenT. C� .il . 3) Provide conies of any revises nesTer plans, incremenTal_ �- site plans, eTe., not previously submitted. `- `O ;✓ Note: If a res=onsa .is to be more than one or Two sentences, arse:n as Exhibit d) Provide a summary ccmoarison of develoomenT activity proposed and ac-uaIIy conducted for the reporting year. Examote: Numoer of dwelling units constructed, site imorove menTs, lots sold, acres mined, gross floor area constructed,, barrels of sTorage CZPAcity completed, permits o7Tainea, eTc. Note: If a resoc ise is To be more Than one sentence, aTT acn as Exhibit 'C'. i S) Have env undeveloped tra:Ts of land In the development (other Than individual single-feTily ICTS) been s=1d To e seberaTe enTity or eavelz:er? If so, idenTify Tract, its size, ano The tuver. Please :rovide mess wnich snow The Tra:-s involve:, 7 raCT =Lver 68 BLW) 4-07- 85 Page Throe Note: It a response Is to be more than one sentence, attach. as Exh I bTt 1.01 6) Describe any' lands'purchased or optioned adjacent to the original Development of Regional impact site subseauenT to Issuance of the development order. Identify such land, its size, and Intended use on a site plan and map. Note: If a response is To be more Than one sentence, Attach as Exhlblt .'E'•/ 7) List any substantlal local, state, and federal permits which have been obtained. Applied for, or denied, during This .reporTing period. Specify The agency, type of permit, Ana duT1• for eacn. Nate: If a response is To be more Than one senTence, a-racn as Exhibit IF. 8) Assess the development's and local governmenT:s• �- continuing compliance with any conditions of approval c=nTainea in The ORI developmanT order. Note: Attach, as Exhibit 'G'. (See arracned form) 9) Provide any informaTion That is specifically reauired by the OevelopmenT Order To be included In The annual reoorT. 10) Provide a state-+enT certifying Thar all persons hove been sent copies c' The annual re_» rT In conformance with SubsecTlons 380.06(14) and (16), F.S. Person cc-nletlnc The -Questionnaire: Title: Representing: U C Lx =' U L a 4 (1 O O t= C7 U1 .0 y O � Co 69 n0187 I ent 1 J-87-1109 RESOLUTION NO. 49 . A RESOLUTION CONCERNING" THE' -DOWNTOWN MIAMI DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT, ENCOMPASSING AN AREA OF THE CITY OF'MIAMI UNDER THE JURISDICTION OF THE MIAMI DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY WITH . THE EXCEPTION OF THE SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST AREA AS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN, PURSUANT TO AN APPLICATION FOR DEYELOPMENT` APPROVAL PROPOSED BY THE MIAMI DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY;" AUTHORIZING AN INCREMENT I DEVELOPMENT ORDER, APPROVING SAID DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT AFTER CONSIDERING THE REPORT 'AND`"RECObMENDATIONS OF'"THE SOUTH ' FLORIDA REGIONAL, PLANNING COUNCIL AND THE CITY OF MIAMI PLANNING ADVISORY' BOARD, SUBJECT TO THE ' CONDITIONS OF .THE INCREMENT I DEVELOPMENT ORDER ATTACHED HERETO AS EXHIBIT 'A', THE APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL INCORPORATED HEREIN BY REFERENCE, AND THE REPORT AND kECOMMENDATIONS•OF THE SOUTH FLORIDA REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL INCORPORATED HEREIN BY REFERENCE; MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW; PROVIDING THAT THE INCREMENT I DEYELOPMENT'ORDER SHALL BE BINDING ON THE APPLICANT AND SUCCESSORS IN INTEREST; DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO SEND COPIES OF .THIS RESOLUTION AND THE INCREMENT I ' DEYELOPMENT ORDER TO AFFECTED AGENCIES AND THE APPLICANT; 'DIRECTING THE CITY MANAGER TO TAKE ALL ACTIONS NECESSARY TO FULFILL THE CITY'S OBLIGATIONS UNDER THE INCREMENT I DEVELOPMENT ORDER; AND PROVIDING A 'SEYERABILITY CLAUSE. WHEREAS, on November 26, 1986, the Downtown' Development Authority ,of the City of Miami submitted a complete Application for Development Approval for a Development of Regional 'Impact to the South Florida Regional Planning Council, the Florida Department of Community Affairs, and the City of Miami pursuant to F.S. 380.06 (1987), for the ongoing development through the year 2007 of a portion of the area within the DOA jurisdiction, as legally described in the Development Order attached hereto; and - WHEREAS, the Miami Planning Advisory Board, at its meeting held on December 9, 1987, following an advertised public hearing, adopted Resolution No. 75-87 by 6 to 2 vote, roco^mending _appro.val of th Increment I Development Order for Downtown Miami as attached hereto; and WHEREAS, on December 10, 1987, the City Commission conducted n public hearing pursuant to F.S. 380.06 (1987); and WHEREAS, the r City Commission considered the Application for Development r Approval, the report and recommendations of the South Florida Regional CITY CO&IMI SIS ON ATTACHMENTS MEETING of 1 DEG 10 19HT FtivLQJLD ecsownon � o. . Ntlia�rS, . U cri '� C a� U Q o LL U 1 o C n U c o -> c a r; O U E • • Planning Council, and. each element requi-red to be considered by F.S. 380.06 (1987):•and 'WHEREAS, the C•(ty Commission determined that all requirements of notice and other Je,'gal requirements for the issuance of the proposed Increment I _Development Order had been complied with; and WHEREAS, the City Commission deems it advisable and in the best interest of the general welfare of the City of Miami to issue a Increment I Development Order as hereinafter set forth; NOW, THEREFORE;: BE IT RESOLYED .,BY THE COMMISSIOH.OF THE CITY -.OF MIAMI,' FLORIDA: Section 1. The Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law are made with respect to the Project as described in the Increment I Development Order for Downtown Miami, which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A""and made a part hereof by reference, and -is applicable to an area encompassing that area within the City Of Miami under the jurisdiction of the Downtown Development Authority, with the exception of the Southeast Overtown/Park West Redevelopment District, as more particularly described in Exhibit "A". Section 2. The Increment I Development Order for Downtown Miami, (Exhibit "A"), is hereby granted and issued. Section 3. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to immediately send certified copies of this Resolution together with Exhibit "A" and copies of all exhibits, attachments, and written materials, including portions of ordinances referenced in the text of the Increment 'I�Development Order to: The Florida Department of Community Affairs, 2571 Executive Center Circle East, Tallahassee, Florida, 32301; The South Florida Regional Planning Council, 3440 Hollywood Boule4ard, Suite 140' Hollywood, Florida, 33021; and the Downtown Development Authority, Suite 1800, One Biscayne Tower, Miami, Florida 33132. , Section 4. The City Manager is hereby directed to take al•l e 'actions necessary to fulfill the City's obligations under the terms of the Increment I Development Order for Downtown Miami (Exhibit "A"). i 2 ZRmd 6 dA U�C LC U Q U .O o l— U 0 o 0 0 v� c 0 E C/) Section 5. In`the event that any. portion or: se6tion of:this :Resolution or 6e'Increment I `Development Order 'for Downtown Miami (Exhibit "A") is determined -to be invaTid; illegal, or unconstitutional by a-;court1or,,agenc:y.of . competent ju,risdictibsuch;decision shall An no manner affect the .,.remaining: portions of this Resolution or the -Increment I`"Development"Order• for.�Downtown• -Miami (Exhibit "A'), which sha11 remain in full, force and effect. PASSED.AND.. ADOPTED thi s l Oth day of pecember 1987. rr` ; XAVIER L. SUAREZ*' MAYOR ATTEST: CP P Zz o1ATTY HIRAI, CITY. CLERK PREPARED AND APPROVED BY: /009L E. MAXWELL, �,8'SIS7ANT CITY ATTORNEY � LC m U APPROVED AS 9ORM AND. CORRECTNESS: .c — U l � C O U� LUCIA A. DOUGHERT , CITY ATTORNEY 0 E e r � 3 INC Incr� 1 • EXHIBIT 'A' INCREMENT .I DEVELOPMENT ORDER "WAME OF DEVELOPMENT: Downtown Miami NAME OF DEVELOPER: Downtown Development Authority of the City of Miami AUTHORIZED AGENT OF DEYELOPER: Roy F. Kenzie, Executive Director; Downtown Development Authority and Sergio Rodriguez, Director,"City of Miami Planning Department,,_ or their successors. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The Project consists Iof development in Downtown Miami through the Year 2007, including the following land uses and increments: Land Uses Increment I Increment II Increment III Totals Office (gross square feet) 7,100.,000 3,600,000 3,700,000 14,400,000 Government Office (gross square feet) 300,000 250,000 200,000 750,000 Retail/Service ' (gross square feet) 1,050,000 400,000 500,000 •1,P50,000 Hotel (rooms) 1,000 500 1,100 2,600 Residential (dwelling units) 3,550 2,550 .2,920 ;.9.,0Z0 Convention (gross square feet) 500,000 0 0 500,000 Wholesale/Industrial (gross square feet) 1,050,000 0 1,050,000 2,100,000 Institutional (gross square feet) 300,000 0 300,000 600,000 Attractions/Recreation (seats) 3,400 1,600 5,000 10,000 Pursuant to F.S. 380.06(22) (1987), the Project specifies the total amount of development planned for each land use category, but provides flexibility .for such development to be located anywhere within the Project Area, subject to local land development regulations. The Project Area includes all nroperty wi'hin the boundaries. or the Downtown Development Authority, with the exception of that area between HE/NW 5th Street and 1-395 known a� ."Park West', as illustrated, on the map in Exhibit 1 and described in Exhibit 2 atta-hed hereto. The Project Area contains a total of approximately 839 acres of land, including approximately 78 acres currently zoned and developed as i City parks. 1 U O N .0 Z. C U o a� LL O O t= r c � O = U� •c O E Cl) (D Q) LEGAtDEStRIPTION'OF 'SUBJECT PROPERTY: See Exhibit 2. OEFINFTIpNS: ..For the purposes of.-this,Development Order., -the following terms shall' he defined a•s. follows: .. ADA or AP61ication'for• Development Approval: The original Application for Development'Approvdl for Downtown Miami filed by the DDA on November 25, 1986, pursuant to F.S. 380.06 (1987). CA or Consolidated Application for Development Approval*: The revised ADA prepared pursuant' to 'paragraph 16 on page 13 herein. Certificate of .Occupancy:, A,permanent of temporary and/or partial Certificate of Occupancy issued, pursuant. to. Section 307 of the -South Florida Building Code, for any "Net New Development" as defined herein. City: The Cl-iy of Miami, Florida. Council: The South Florida Regional Planning Council. DDA or Downtown Development Authority: The Downtown Development Authority of the City of Miami, Florida. DERM: The Metropolitan Dade County Department of Environmental Resources Management. DRI: Development of Regional Impact. Development Credits: The individual units if land uses included within Total Allowable Development, as measured by square footage or number of dwelling units, hotel rooms, or seats. FDER: The Florida Department of Environmental Reg,lation. ' Major Use Special Permit: A special permit issued by the City, Commission e Pursuant to Ordinance 9500, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, as amended. 2 U cu v •0 LL U U U Q] 0 cod f t, o U E Cn Net New Development: Any construction or reconstruction which will result in a net, increase, within any 'Parcel of Land", of residenti'al-dwelling units, hotel rooms, seats in attractions/recreation facilities or gross square footage for office, government office,, „retail/service, convention, wholesale/industrial or institutional uses. Land uses. to 'be removed; by -- demolition of a building or structure may be credited against the proposed new land uses for purposes of calculating the net increase; if the Planning Director determines that there was a valid Certificate of Occupancy existing on the effective date of this .Development Order for the land uses to be demolished. If a change of land use is proposed; the Planning Director may credit the prior land use against the proposed land use based upon equivalent impacts as measured by peak hour vehicle trip generation. Any activity which has on the effective date of this Development Order a valid building permit or any currently effective development order shall not, be included as Net New Development. .The Planning Director may exclude from Net New Development any small development under 10,000 square feet in.floor area, if he finds that such development would have no regional impact as measured by peak hour vehicle trips. Parcel of Land: Any quantity 'of land capable of being described +ith such definiteness that its location and boundaries may be established, and which is designated by its owner or developer as land to be used or developed as a unit or which has been used or developed as a unit. Project_ That Project described in the "PROJECT DESCRIPTION;' on Page 1 herein. Project Area: The area included within the legal description in Exhibit.2. Total Allowable Development: The quantity of Net New Development for which Certificates of Occupancy may be issued under the terms and conditions, of this Development Order, together with the applicable Master Development Order, as may be modified pursuant to F.S. 380.06(19) (1987), and which shall be measured by the following land uses: JO Office 7,100,000 gross square feet Government Office .300,000 gross square feet U C CU a C Q) O .A U- O G n7 U C E Cl) 3 Retail/Service 1,050.000 gross square_•,fee.t_; Hotel 1,000 rooms Residential. `3,550 dwelling Units ' Convention-- 500,000 'gross' square feet wholesale/Industrial 1.050,000 'gross square feet Institutional 300•,000 gross square feet - Attractions/Recreation 3;400 seats T The City may permit simultaneous increases and decreases in the .above described land use categories; provided that the regional impacts of the land uses as changed will not exceed the adverse regional impacts of the land uses in Increment I of the Project as originally approved, as measured by .total peak hour vehicle trips.. FINDINGS OF FACT: The following findings of fact are hereby confirmed and adopted with respect to the Project: A. The findings and determinations of fact set forth in the.recital's of the resolution to this Development Order are hereby confirmed. B. The real property which is the subject of this Development Order is legally described in Exhibit 2. C. The DOA filed the ADA with the City, the Council, and the Florida Department of Community Affairs. D. The CADA has been filed by the DDA pursuant to F.S. 380.06(22) (1967) authorizing a downtown development authority to apply for development approval and receive a development order for any or all of the area within its jurisdiction.' Individual developments are not identified or requi-ed to be identified in the CADA. E. The purpose of the CADA is to identify and assess probable 'regional impacts and to obtain approval for Total Allowable Development in accordance with the general guidelines set forth in this Development Order and the CADA. The concept is to recognize the Project Area as a single area of high intensity development and to focus the DRI review process primarily on the impacts that Total Allowable Development within 4 the -.,area will have lon land, -water; transportation; ',environmental,' ,community services, energy and :other -resources 'and, systems.:of regional significance. The CAW seeks .a single DRI -review process for overall phased develapment -of :the.dow.ntown area rather than requiring each individual. DRIscale development within -the downtown -area to file for separate DRI reviews. F. Development within the Project Area is expected to" continue to be accomplt._shed over•an extended period of time by a.varie.ty of developers, which may include the City. -These developers -:may respond toy market demand.and .technologies that.can only be -estimated 'in the CADA. : The CADA is intended to serve as a flexible guide to planned development of the Project Area rather than a pr6cise blueprint for its development. Therefore, pursuant to F.S. 380.06(21)(b) (1987), the CADA seeks master development approval for three increments of development over a period of approximately twenty years and specific development approval for Increment I, which is the first phase of development projected for a period of approximately five years. Subsequent incremental applications may need to be adjusted %to more nearly serve as a living guide recognizing the evolution of market demand and technologies. G. The Project Area contains a total of approximately 839 acres, including approximately 78 acres presently zoned and developed as City parks.' The CADA proposes Net New Development within the Project Area for the land uses, quantities and phases defined herein as Total Allowable Development. N. The Project is not located in an area of critical state concern as designated pursuant to F.S. 380 (1987). I. A comprehensive review ,of the probable impacts that will be generated by Increment I of the Project has been conducted by various City departments, as reflected in the CADA, and the South Florida Regional Planning Council staff. ' t J. This Development Order is consistent with the report and recommendations of the South Florida Regional Planning Council, entitled "Development of Regional, Impa5t Assessment for Downtown Miami - Increment I", dated i October 5, 1987. The South Florida Regional Planning Council recommends 5 Im cLc Li .3 C Q)U CL 0 LL `= c� ca o U� a C o E Cn L � approval of Increment •I of •the',Project; and all `conditions'to which 'such ,approval 'is subject are reflected •herei'n. K. � Increment I 'of the- Project,is -consistent with 'the 'appl'icatle portion of the State land -development plan and the Regional Plan.for South Florida. L. -Increment °I of the 'Project is in conformity with the adopted Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan.,- M. Increment 1 of the Project is in' accord withthe district zoning classifications of Zoning Ordinance 9500; as amended. N. Increment I of the Project will have a favorable impact on the economy of the City. P. Increment I of the. Project will efficiently use public transportation .facilities. 0. Increment I of the Project will favorably affect the need for people to find adequate housing reasonably accessible to their places of employment. R. Increment I of the Project will .efficiently use necessary public facilities. S. Increment I of the Project`wi,ll include adequate mitigative` measures to assure- that it will not adversely effect the environment and natural resources of the City. v 7S C T. Increment I of the Project will not adversely affect living conditions N U in the City. O LPL L U. increment I of the Project will not adversely affect public safety. o CV Y. There is a public need for Increment I of the Project. o 0 U� CONCLUSIONS OF LAN: That, having made the findings of fact contained above, the City Uo Commission hereby concludes as -a matter of law, the following: A. The DOA constitutes a "downtown development authority" as defined in F.S. 380 (1987). and is . authorized by F.S. 380 (1987) Ltd make application for development approval and receive a development order. B. Increment I of the Project complies with the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood P)an, is consistent with the orderly development and goals of the City of Miami, and .complies with local land development 1 regulations. 6 o C. Increment I of the Project does not unreasonably interfere with the achievement of the objectives of the adopted State land development plan :applicabl.e to the•.City;tof.Miami and the Regional Plan for South Florida. D. Incrpment -I_ of the Project is consistent with the report and recommendations of the South Florida Regional Planning Council and does not unreasonably interfere with any of the considerations and objectives set forth in F.S. 380 (1987). E. Changes in Increment I of the Project which do not exceed the Total Allowable Development or'which do not result in a net reduction of more than 5 percent in total acreage zoned and developed as City parks,'shall not -'constitute a substantial deviation under F.S. 380 (1987). ACTION TAKEN: That. having made the findings of fact and reached the conclusions of law set forth above. -it is ordered that Increment I of the Project is hereby approved, subject to, the following conditions: THE CITY, ITS SUCCESSORS, AND/QR ASSIGNS JOINTLY OR SEYERALLY MAY ISSUE BUILDING PERMITS AND CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY FOR TOTAL ALLOWABLE DEVELOPMENT, PURSUANT TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THIS DEVELOPMENT ORDER TOGETHER WITH THE ATTENDANT MASTER DEYELOPMENT ORDER AND SHALL: 1. Require all development pursuant to this Development Order to be in accordance with applicable building codes, land development regulations, ordinances and other laws. 2. For the purpose of base -line data collection, conduct air quality monitoring for carbon monoxide (CO) concentrations based on the following requirements: a. CO monitoring data shall be provided for each of the, three (3) sub -areas as described in the CADA: Brickel1, the Central Business District and Omni. b. The monitoring shall consist of four (4) weeks of data collection A 14 during the winter months, November 15th through March 15th, for each sub -area. 7 _ C 1LC crs C O C r cd `- O O V\ _ •� a 0 Cn , C. The monitoring `for each sub -area shell :be completed prior to the / Issuance••.of':any ~certif Cate of ,occupancy within that .sub -area .for Ahe1irst development under this Development Order which meets 100 percent of the presumptive threshold for Developments of Regional Impact pursuant to Rule 27F, F.A.C., within that sub -area; or prior to March 15, 19911 whichever comes first. d. The" monitor hill be located at the"". presumed . worst ::case ~.intersection for the .Brickell and Omni sub -areas. The location will' be. selected jointly `by the City, Florida Department -of Environmental 'Regulation (FDER), Dade County Environmental Resources Management (DERM),` and Council staff. It has been agreed by these agencies that the existing monitor located in the Central Business District will be acceptable for that sub -area. e. Perform the monitoring required by 2a. and 2b. above as prescribed by the policies and regulations -governing DERM and submit final air quality monitorins reports to FDER, DERM, and the Council staff within 60 days of the completion of the monitoring. 3. Conduct air quality modeling. of carbcn monoxide impacts to deiiermine what, if any, changes are needed in "air quality monitoring, including the need to continue monitoring. The modeling shall be completed -within one year after the base -line data monitoring has been completed pursuant to paragraph 2 above and the intersections have been selected pursuant to 3a. below. The air quality modeling shall follow FDER guidelines and shall: a. Be limited to no more than ten (10) intersections to be selected, from among the intersections projected in the CADA to operate at level of service E .or F. The intersections shall be selected Jointly by FDER, DERM, the Council staff, and the City.' t b. Be submitted in .a detailed and comprehensive air quality analysis to FDER And DERM for comment and review, and to the Council staff and the City for review and approval. 8 0C . C a� CL U a) LL Z' o a ow. y .c Q Ul _ fy C .iH P O co c. Include proposed changes to air quality monitor'ing'as,',iustified'!by the air quality modeling analysis. ' 4. If the results of the air 'qualitymodeling study, as `descri'bed in paragraph 3 above; are more than 85'percent `but`less thah"100 percent o'f the State standards for CO' concentrations, implement ''an -air 'qual'ity monitoring and abatement. program following approval- of the report pursuant to`3b above. mo itoring and abatement program, including -a time frame for implementation, must be approved by the Council staff and the City subsequent to review and comment by FDER and OERM. The program may include, but is not limited tQ; the following techniques: a. Transportation Control Measures ITCH). b. Physical planning measures (e.g, signaiization, parking area locati-ons,'addition of turn lanes, etc.). C. The continuance of monitoring for 'specified sub -areas. 5. If the results of the air quality modeling study, as described in Condition 3 above, exceed State' standards for CO concentrations, do one of the following: yCO R. a. Provide acceptable documentation which clearly indicates that CO L a� U �. exceedences will not occur, or that the Net New Development '.� _v U 0 G r cLf seeking approval will not. contribute to the , predicted CO Q U� violation, or -that any potential CO additions for each Net New c Development have been or wi11 be mitigated (according to Council a staff and the ;City subsequent to review and comment by FDER and . 0 00 DERM) prior to issuance of building permits for the particular Net New Development. Su( i documentation may include a modeling study which incorporates measures such as those contained in Condition 4a., b., and c., above. This documentation must be approved by the Council staff and t.;e City subsequent to review and comment by FDER and PERM. �I 1 9 b. `llithhold'''the" issuance of any building permits for Net New Development within the sub -area that shows CO'exceedences. 6. ''Based;'�upon the transportation 'impacts generated' by Total Allowable Development for. Increment"I. p'ay` or'contract' to pay '$7,543,4I9 (fair share in 1987 doYlart).' to be expended on any or ail' of the `following transportation improvements: _ a. SW 2nd Avenue bridge and approaches or the Brickell Avenue bridge'' and approaches. b. intersection improvements to the entrance and exit ramps to I-395 at NE 1st Avenue and NE 2nd Avenue; C. other transportation improvements if mutually agreed upon by -the City and Council staff, subsequent to review and comment by Dade County and the Florida Department of Transportation. The City shall pay or- contract to pay the fair share within 60 days following notice that the subject improvement has been let to contract for construction. In the .event the City contracts :to pay the fair share,such contract shall in no way affect the construction schedule of the subject transportation improvement. If the improvements above have not been let to contract for construction before the earlier date of a. or b. specified below: a. four years after the effective date of the Development Order, or b. the date of issuance of Certificates of Occupancy for more than 80 percent of the Total Allowable Development, then Council staff; the City; Dade County; and the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) will jointly decide the reallocation of $7,543,419 (fair share in 1987 dillars) within 90 days of the earlier date of either a.' or b. specified above. 7. Withhold the issuance of building permits for Net New Development If the. City has been determined to be in noncompliance with paragraph 6 above. 8. Make efforts to work closely with applicable governmental agencies to ensure that the Metromover Stage 11 herein be completed as identified in the current Metropolitan Planning Organization's Transportation 10 U ca U o o .0 U_ U 0 o 0 o U�L7 CD j o E L_ Improvement Program (TIP) published in June; `1`987.' In the event that by December 31;` 1992, the Metromover Stage II improvements are -not substantially under construction``'as determined by Council staff, then this situation will be considered "a 'substantial deviation f rom the mitigative efforts anticipated to offset the 'adverse impacts of Total Allowable Development. In this event; the Applicant shall be required to undergo additional Development of . Regional Impact review for transportation impacts pursuant .to F.S. .380.06(19)(a)(g) and- (h), (1986). Such .additional. Development of Regional Impact review, if required, :shall. be .initiated by March- 31; 1993. Net New Developments which. .have obtained building permits prior to December 31, 1992 shall not be affected by any subsequent'review. 9. Within 6 months of the effective date of this Development Order; prepare and recommend to the Miami City Commission d Transportation Control Measure *(TCM) Ordinance; which shall require Net New Development to do the following:. a. actively encourage and promote car and van pooling by establishing or participating in a car pool information program; and b. provide mass transit route and schedule information in convenient locations throughout the individual development; and C. encourage mass transit use by the provision of bus shelters, bus turnout lanes; or other amenities to increase transit ridership. In addition; the TCM Ordinance shall include other appropriate transportation control measures to -be selected frora but not be limtited to the list entitled s"Table 4.9 - Potential Transportation Control Measures (TCH's) for Downtown Miami" on page 4.;22(R) of the CADA. . The TCM ordinance must be zpproved by Council with input from the Florida Department of Community Affairs and the Florida Department of Transportation. 10. 1n the even that a Transportation Control Measures (TCM) Ordinance i substantially in accord with paragraph 9 above is not adopted by the 11 U ' C 'Le Qc c U o .0 U t a`) U o��as U� r� , C E L- o � )va- T'� 0 Miami! ° CIiy- Coeiaissi•on Hittiin'-18 "months ':df _the'effective `date '`of this'-" Oeveildoment Order,' `determine "that -this' "sf7:uati on ` .consti-Lutes "' a" ` substantial deviation from the 'miti`gati ie:`e'f'f.orts`,'°anti.ctpated `to offset'- the •adverse impacts of Total Allowaole'Development. In this`event, the"'° Applicant shall be'required to' undergo add itio'naI ;Development' of Regional Impact review pursuant to F.S. 380.06(19)(a)(g) and (h) (1986)., Such additional Development of Regional .Impact review, if required,. shall be initiated by the Applicant within 90 days.pf the identification. of its need. 11. Have the authority' to assess development for' its proportionate share of the costs of improvements and/or services necessary to monitor and/or mitigate any adverse -impacts: The City shall a'l.so have authority to assess development its proportionate share of the costs attributable to preparation of the .,master plan, the Applidation for Development Approval,. and this Development Order, as well as the future costs of reviewing individual development -applications, monitoring compliance with this Development Order, and any other costs reasonably related to the administration and implementation of this Development Order. "If necessary, the City shall establish a procedure for rebating any,, funds „ collected in excess of those funds attributable to a particular development and necessary to imolement this Development Order or .any ordinance or procedure required to monitor and enforce compliance with this Development Order and to mitigate the impacts of Total Allowable Development.' 12. Establish December 31, 1992 as the date until which the City agrees thdt the grantees of building permits or Major Use Special Permits for new development, under the Downtown Miami - Increment I Development of Regional Impact shall not be subject to down -zoning, unit density reduction, or intensity reduction to the extent of the amount of development included within the building permit or Major Use Special Permit, unless the City can demonstrate that substantial changes in the conditions underlying the approval of the development .order have r 0 occurred, or that the development order was based on substantially 12 GU 0 L v U a O C c o U� c E Q Z o E U) . U" 1 Applicant,' or that' the change`is clearly •essential to the public health; isafety or.welfare: . •MORIT0lZIXG,,.-REP0RTING,: AND •ENFORCEMENT: J3. The ,City shal-1 monitor the .capacity .`of -Total •-Allowable, Development by - _ reserving —the amount -.of-'Development Credits._ necessary_ for Net New -.Development at a tuneto be --determined by the Cfty, prior to or coincident"xi"th ,approval of a buil-d4ng .permit or.Major Use Special permit.. The .City shall place reasonable time limits on all building permits ;and Major - -Use Special Permits_..to,- assure that construction progresses within a reasonable period of —time after approval to prevent stockpiling of reservations for Development Credits. The time period established by the City shall_,take-into, account the size of the proposed Net New' -Development in ,rel-ationship to the time necessary to begin construction. 14. Upon the issuance of :a Certificate of Occupancy for any Net New -: Development, the City- shall make appropriate subtractions from the amount -of Total Allowable Dev`el•opment under this Development Order. No Certificates of Occupancy shall be issued for Net New Development which would, in the aggregate, exceed the amount of -Total AI`16Wable v C L Development under this Development Order. E a m U L ,9 15. The City shall integrate all original and supplemental ADA information - U into a Consolidated Application for Development Approval (CADA) and O C r M v submit two copies of the CADA to the Council; one copy to the City U � C Clerk, and one copy to the Florida Department of Community Affairs — 24 within thirty (30) days of the effective date of this Development Order. �O E ' I W a) The CADA shall be prepared as follows: a. Where new, clarified, or revised information was prepared subsequent to submittal of the ADA but prior to issuance of this Development Order, whether in response to a formal statement of information needed or otherwise, the original pages of the ADA will beIreplaced with revised pages. 13 b. Revised+ pages will have a "Page Number (R) -'Date" notation; with 'Page Number' being the number of the original ,page, '(R) J indicating that the page was revised, and "Date" stating the date of the revision. 16. The Consolidated -_Application _-for.DevelopmentApproval •isincorporated. herein by .=reference :.and ...wil.1. be relied ,upon by the '•;.parties_. in - discharging their. statutory, duties.,. under F.S. 380. (1987) ;.. and . 1 ocaa 1. ordinances. Substantial .compliance with the factual representations_, contained in -,the Consolidated Application: for Development,Approval-.Js-.-a, condition for approval unless waived:or.modtf.ied by agreement among the Council, City, and Applicant:, its::successors; and/or assigns..: 17. All terms, proposals, suggestions and procedures proposed in the Application for Development Approval, but not specifically incorporated in this Development Order, shall not be considered a part .of the Consolidated*Application for Development Approval insofar as they may have been deemed to place a requirement on the City of Miami to -take any action or abstain from taking any action.* The terms of this Development Order shall control and any requirements of the City are specifically enumerated herein. • v t c IS- The City shall prepare -an annual report and submit copies to the - C ca Q U Council, the City Clerk and Florida Department of Community Affairs on .2 L U or before each anniversary date of this Development Order. The annual o report for Downtown Miami - Increment I must also be incorpprated into U the annual report re p required in .the Downtown Miami Master Development 2e Order so that a. single annual report is compiled for the entire Project. a : o U E The annual report shall include, at a minimum: c!) a. A complete response to each question in Exhibit 3. b. Identification and description of any known changes in the plan of development, or in the representations contained in the OADA, or in the phasing for the reporting year and for the next year. C. A .summai-yo comparison of Total Allowable Development and Net New Development proposed and actually approved during the year, 14 including locations; acreage; square footage; number of•units;:and other units of land uses '.included within Total' Allowable Development, and the acreage zoned and.developed- as.City parks. d. An hssessment` of 'the 'A:pl'icant's, `and�the'C.ity's',compliance 'v'th' P. the conditions of approval contained in`thfs Deyelopment'Order'Ind the commitments which are contained in the _`Applicationfor' Development Approval and Which have' been identified 'by the- City;' the Council; or the Department of Community' Affairs as being -,significant. e. Specification of any amended DRI applications for development approval or requests for a' substantial deviation determination that were filed in the reporting year or to be filed during the next year. f. An ' Indication._ of change, i f any, ' in Ci ty juri sdiction 'for any. portion of the development since - issuance of this Development. Oder. g. A statement that all persons have been sent copies of the annual report in conformance with F.S. 380.06 (18) (19871. ; h. A copy of any recorded notice of the adoption of this Development Order or any subsequent modification that was recorded by the Applicant pursuant to F.S. 380.06(15) (1987). i. Any other information. required by the Department of Community Affairs (DCA) in accordance with F.S. 380.06 (18)(1987). 19. The City shall enforce -,the requirements of the Dade County Shoreline Development Review Ordinance (65-14) for all subsequent developments within the Shoreline Development boundbry. t e 20. The deadline for commencing any development shall be two (21 years from the effective date of this Development Order. The termination date for completing development shall be December 31, 1992, provided that the Applicant, or its successors .and assigns, complies with paragraph 25 15 . U tl 'j C Q) C U 0_ as .0 � 0 a o r C.)j U1 _ o cf) � herein. The termination date may only be modified in accordance with F.S. 380.06(19)(c) (1987). 21.. The effective date of this Development Order shall be 45 days from its transmitta'1=to the Florida Department of Community Affairs; Council; and Applicant; provided, however, that if this Development Order is appealed, the effective date will not start until the day after aTl appeals have been withdrawn or resolved pursuant to F.S. 380.07(2) (1987). 22. �"The'City, shall, not, violate any of the`'Conditions of this Development Order ---or :otherwise fail to -act in substantial compliance with this Development Order or permit any, property owner within the boundaries covered by, this Oevel opment` Order to violate -any of the provisions of this -Development Order. In the event any entity controlled by the Applicant and/or the City or any permittee or landowner of any Parcel of _Land violates (hereinafter "violator") the provisions of this . Development Order, the City shall stay the effectiveness of this Development. Order as to. the Parcel =of Land in which the violative activity or conduct has .occurred and withhold -further permits, approvals, and services for development in said Parcel of 4and upon passage of any appropriate resolution by -the City, adopted in accordance with this section, finding that such violation has occurred. The violator will be given written notice by the City that states: 1) the nature of the purported violation, and 2) that unless the violation is cured within 30 days of said notice, the City will hold a public hearing to ,consi der the matter wi thi n 60 days of the date of sai d noti 4e . In _ the event the violation is not curable in 30 days, the violator's diligent.good faith efforts, as determined by the City, to cure the . violation within that )eriod will obviate the need to hold a public hearing and this Development Order will remain in full force -and effect unless the violator does not diligently pursue the curative +action to 4 completion within a reasriable time, in which event the City will give 15 days notice to the violator of its intention to' stay the effectiveness of this Development Order and withhold further permits, 16 approvals; and services to the Parcel of Land in which the violation has occurred -and until the violation i•s cured. The terms of this paragraph may be modified from time to time by written agreement by'.the ODA, the 'City, and Council --staff, to enable the City to enforce the terms of this Development Order to the fullest extent, while providing due process to all developers under this Development Order. 23. The Planning Director, City of Miami Planning Department; is hereby designated to monitor compliance with' all conditions of this Development Order and shall have the -duty and authority to interpret the provisions of this Development Order and 'to` promulgate:rulings; regulations and procedures necessary to, implement it; provided the ,.same are not inconsistent with the "terms hereof or of F.S. 380 '(1987); or duly promulgated and adopted rules thereunder... Appeals to decisions of the �-- Planning Director may be filed pursuant to procedures set forth in Article•30 of -Ordinance 9500, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, . Florida, as amended.` '.-Any '..noncompliance shall be subject to the provisions of. paragraph 22 herein. 24. The South Florida Reg Tonal' Planning Council report and recommendations, entitled "Development of Regional Impact Assessment for Downtown Miami - I,ncrement I -dated October .5. .1987 is incorporated herein by reference. 25. Within 30 days of the effective date of this Development Order,' it shall be recorded with the Clerk, Dade County Circuit Court, pursuant to F.S. 380.06(15) (1987), specifying that the Development Order runs with the land and is binding on the• Applicant, its successors, -and/or assigns, jointly or feverally. 26. The existence of this Development Order shall not act to limit or proscribe the rights of any person under F.S. 380 (1987) to ,file an Application for Development Approval and obtain an 'individual development order for property covered by this Development Order, not withstanding the existence of this Development Order., In the event that i 10 such an individual develooment order is approved and becomes effective, 17 i U 1� 0 'L a) C U Q co LL E U 0 U� ra C •� a 0 U E U) No the findividual _ deveLooment'.or.der ":hall '-tvntrol"'develocmentof .the . covered. ..: property- -by, the,.indfvidual`�velooment�order-And the .-terms and - ..: • � conditions of'-this'Develooment Order shal:.l:no,longer be --binding coon the grooerty. -Any such individual :development orders shall;=byaheir°terms,. be 'consistent --with the "obj-ectives and -conditions of this Development Order. V . This Development Order shall not repeal; nor amend in any way, any other. currently .effective development order or building permit within the subject area previously issued by tte City Commission pursuant to F:S.;_ 380 (1987). This:Bevel opment Order shall. not create: nor authorize 'the .=-- crea-tion or imposition of any additional requirements or restrictions, with respect •to any present or 'future _development under any currently ." effective Development Order or buiId.ing permit issued prior hereto. Notwithstanding -this paragraph, -.the City•shal.l continue to have whatever authority, pursuant to law it may now' have or may acquire in the future (other than by virtue of this Development Order). 28, This Development Order 4hall not create nor impose any additional requirements or restrictions upon the City with respect to its powers to enact impact fee or assessment ordinances on development, inclg4ing Net U ,. New Development under this Development Order and future development of E the City, as such impact fees or assessments may be authorized by law. �? �+ 29. In the event that a substantial deviarjon is determined under the terms o 0 CO of this Development Order or F.S. 380 (1987), the City shall retain its 0 ability to issue building permits and Major Use Special Permits and shall continue to do so unabated, subject to the terms and conditions of q this Development Order., W 30. In the event that this Development Order s subject to litigation wherein an injunction is issued staying the enforcement' pf this Development Order, the City shall either, under this Development Order or under the powers granted it by state law, be rermitted to continue to issue building permits, Major Use Special Permits and Certificates of �•( Occupancy until such time .as a final resolution of the litigation occurs. Q 18 I lit N.W. 17 .ST. I. r AAL LLI L U; 77r� A r.: ul can us III IC i N.W. 5 ST. ca mar—% IF FLAGLER S T F L= ==3= Cc uj DOWNTOWN WAMI DRI BOUNDARY MAP U a LY W CL c cu 0 .0 LL 0 = CO T4. ". `EXHIBIT'2 � . ::LEGAL DESCRIPTION OFz"SUBJECT' PROPERTY Begin -at .the, intersection of ;.'the .centerlines :of H.W• 5th ;Street `and N.W. ;3rd. Avenue .Least °si de --of N=S. 'Expresswayi.d ,point . of ;begi nni ng also bei ng ,:the N YW.;corner:",of the 'district, ''thence run southerly along. :the, center line{ of N.W..:3rd Avenue -and the:easterlyYside of the N-S Expressway to the centerline of West Flagler Street; thence 1 ' iof sai d West F1 ag1 er Street to. 'the westerly along the center,;ne centerline of the Miami River; thence meandering southeasterly along the centerline of said Miami River to a point of intersection with --:the easterly .right -of -..way -(OW) line of :Aetro .Rapid Transit R/W (formerly Florida East Coast (FEC-) Railroad �R/W) said R/W line being 50 feet easterly of and parallel with the centerline of said Metro Rapid Transit R/W; thence run southerly :and. southwesterly. along said easterly R/W_-Tine of Metro Rapid Transit to the intersection with ,the centerline of:-S.W. 15th Road; thence southeasterly along the centerline of 15th Road to a point of -intersection with the southerly prolongation of the westerly line of COSTA BELLA DEVELOPMENT SUBDIVISION (107-14); thence northeasterly, northwesterly and northeasterly along said westerly line of COSTA BELLA to the intersection with the southerly right-of-way line of S.E. 14th Lane; thence southeasterly, northeasterly, northerly, and northwesterly along said southerly and westerly right-of-way Itine of. S.E. 14th Lane and S.E. 14th Terrace to the intersection with the northwesterly property line of Lot 31 Block 2 of Amended Plat of POINT VIEW as recorded in Plat Book 2 at Page 93 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida; thence northeasterly along the northwesterly line of said Lot 31 to the northeasterly side of the existing ten foot alley in Block 2 of said POINT YIEW; thence southeasterly along the northeasterly side of said ten foot 'alley to the intersection with the property line between Lots 4 and 5 of said Block 2 of POINT YIEW; thence north^asterly alc. ;aid line of Lots 4 and 5 and its prolongation thereof to the - centerline of S.E. 14th Street; thence southeasterly along said centerline of S.E. 14th Street to a point of intersection with the existing bulkhead. and shoreline of Biscayne Bay; thence meandering northerly along the existing bulkhead and shoreline of Biscayne Bay to a point of intersection with the southerly boundary of Claughton Island 19 U C CU U 0_ .0 LL O �= p C p v� ,c � 0 G thence caster ton the said southeriy`R/W line not` ughtcn s g `" :1s1 and . Sri dge ,,,to the .a ntersectI on :with _the ++esterly _bul.kfiea ine of @laughton Island,.,said.-bulkhead line being part of the.SMetropo.litan Dade ,County ` Bulkhead -L.ine as recorded •yin Phat •Book 73 'at' Page `18 of,; the • Public Records; thence southerly;: easter.l,y; -northerly and' westerly,, following acid :existing'_bulkhe8d and i;ts -westerly' prolongation ,thereof ,. around the island to the intersection with the mainland onthe easterly:: shoreline of Biscayne Bay;. thence ineandering in a northwesterland westerly direction along -the- shoreline of Biscayne Bay and the Miami River to the intersection with the easterly R/W line of Brickell Avenue Y Bridge (S.E..2nd Avenue);'thence north along said bridge to the existing .,bulkhead on the northerly shoreline of the Miami River; said bulk; -line also" -being the southerly* boundary of the Dupont Plaza' Center and Miaini Center Joint Venture property; thence northeasterly along the southerly boundary of Dupont Plaza Center and Miami Center Joint Venture property to a point of intersection with the easterly property line of Chopin Associates and Miami Center Limited Partnership; said property_ line being along the shore line of Biscayne Bay; thence northerly along said easterly property line of Chopin Associates and Miami Center Limited Partnership property along Biscayne Bay to`the southerly property, line of Bayfront Park; thence continuing northerly, northeasterly and northwesterly along the bulkhead .line of Bayfront Park and the 'Sayfront Q - - Park Miamarina; thence continuing northerly along the bulkhead line of = ca G U Biscayne Bay to a point of intersection with the centerline of N.E. 17th CU LL Street extended easterly; thence westerly along the centerline of � o j N.E. 17th Street and its extension thereof to the easterly R/W line of c — v the FEC Railroad; thence southerly along the easterly R/W line of the .e FEC Railroad to the limited access right-of-way of I-395; Lhence southeasterly and easterly along the limited access right-of-way of O E a`�i I-395 to the centerline of Biscayne Boulevard; thence southerly along the centerline of Biscayne Boulevard to the centerline of N.E. 5th Street; thence westerly along the centerline and N.E. and N.W. 5th Street to the point of beginning. The above described area contains approximately 839 acres. C 20 Subsection 380.06(16), Florida Statutes, places the responslbiIIty. on the deveioper of an approved development of regional ImoacT (DRI) for submitting an annual report to The local government, The Regional Planning Council -The Deoarrment of Community Affairs, and To all affected permit agencies, on the date ..soeG1fI,ed-in the Develooment Order. The failure of a developer To suDmlt the reoorr-on the - date specified In. The development order may result In The temporary susoension of the developmenT order by the local covern7nenT unTlI the annual reporT is suomitTea TO The review aaencies. This reauiremenT aoclies TO all deveioDmenTS of regional imoacT which have Dean aoorovea since AUouST 6, 1980. If yb u have any questions aDOUT Tnls: reouireo re3orr, call The Dn'I EnforcemenT Coordinator aT, (904) 486-4925. Please Sena the orieinal ccmoleted annual reoorT To The desig68Tea local CovernmenT Official STaTea,in The oeveloomenT order. with (1) copy To each of The follovinc:' a) The regional :Iar.nina amency of jurisdictlon: b) All affected permitting agencies: c) Devision of Resource Plannina and ManagemenT Bureau of Lana and Water Management 2571 ExecuTive Center Circle, E85T Tallahassee, Florida 32301 Please fOrMST your Annual Status ReDorT after The fCrmaT example Provided below, ANI4UAL STATUS REPORT ReoorTing Period: to ►+onTn/Oay/rear ;Un--rr/Oay/rear , DeveIoomen-r: t Name oT Oki LocaTion: `.iTy �_ounry i 10 Develooer: Name: �zrnzany Name Address: STreeT WC8TICr. Q C 0 LL v T U O C: C7 O U1-) �y .0 - -ff a O C/) . iTy, i7a e, .,I: t zze 6740 BLW -07-85 I Page Two 1) Describe any changes made in the proposed Dlnn of cove lopmenT:`phasIng, or, Im The .renresentaTIOns conTaIned In the Application for Development Approval since the DeveloonenT of Regional Impact received approval. Please note any actions (substantial daTerminot tons) •Taken by local government To address these changes. Note: If a^response As to -be more than_.one_sentence, attach as Exhibit 'A' a dotal led description of each change and copies of The modified site plan drawings. Exhibit 'A' should also address The -tol1owIng additional Items If top IIcaoIe. a) -Describe changes In the plan 'of deveioDment or phasing for The repo r Ing year and for the subsequent years: b) State any known Incrementa-I DRI applications for develo:menT an�rroval or recuests for a sUtSTanTlal deviation determination That were filed in The rezoning year and To be filed [::ring The nexT .year; c) Attach a copy of env notice of the ado_-Tlcn of. -a developmenT order or Tne suoseduenT modiflcaTlon of on adopted develo:rnenT order ThaT was recorded by The developer pursuanT To Sut:secrion 380.06(14)(d), F.S. Z) Has there been a chance in local eovernmenT jurisdictton for qny por.ton of the CevelocmenT since the deyele:menT order was issued? If so, has The annexing local government adopted a new Development of Regional Impact development order for the project? Please provide a cozy of the order adopted by•the annexing local eovernmenT. 3) Provide copies of any, revised nesTer plans, incremenThl, site plans, etc., not previously submitted. Note: If a res=ons6 is To be more than one.or two sentences, atTacn as Exhibit 'c', a) Pro ide a summary comparison of development activity proposed and actually conducted for the reporrinn year. , Exanole: Number of dwelling units constructed, site Improve- menTs, lots sold, acres mined, gross floor area constructed, barrels of storage capacity compleTed, permits obtained, eTc. Note: If a response is to be more Tnan one sentence, atTacn as Exhibit i 5) Have any unoevelooed traCTS of land in The develo:nenT (other Tr.an individual single-ie-ily TOTS) been s:I: to a separate enTity or devel__er? If so, i.lenTify TraCT, its size, :no Tne cuver, Please :rovide mess %nice snow the Trzc-s invvlveC. U C tC a) U n U_ ,., U N (D O O C: C U O U rail C O C Wil" tract ever 68 01 0 Submitted into the public recor in Connection With item �l won 1,L WalterrFoeman city clerk 00°-1137 6%MY 10 PM 328 o..i3 390633 "C: I J019;4956 J-66-537 30/7/8b ,,1, 4-RESOLUTION AMENDING-A'DEVELOPMENT ORDER (RESOLUTION 79-396; MAY 24. 1979. AS — FOR'.THE'MIAMI -A A;< << AMENDED) CENTER I:PROJECT, A DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT. PROPOSED BY MIAMI CENTER JOINT VENTURE, AND LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY 100 CHOPIN PLAZA AND APPROXIMATELY 201-399 S. BISCAYNE BOULEVARD . BEING TRACT D, DUPONT PLAZA (50-11); . INCORPORATING THE APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE SOUTH FLORIDA REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL; MAXING FINDINGS. 4 a APPROVING SAID PROJECT SUBJECT TO THE L,�! - �` / MODIFICATIONS TO THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER 'PERTAINING TO THE ENTIRE SITE; FURTHER, ADDING CONDITIONS PERTAINING ONLY TO THE SOUTHERN 3.01 ACRES OF THE SUBJECT SITE KNOWN AS 'ONE DUPONT PLAZA' (FCRMERLT KNOWN AS 'BISCAYNE PLAZA') PHASES 1 AND 2 AND APPROVING WITH CONDITIONS THE SOUTHERN PORTION OF THE SUBJECT PROJECT KNOWN AS ONE DUPONT PLAZA PHASES 1 AND 2; FURTHER, DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO RECORD AND SEND COPIES OF THE HtREIN RESOLUTION AND DEVELOPMENT ORDER TO AFFECTED AGENCIES AND THE DEVELOPER. C WHEREAS, the Miami Planning Advisory Boaro, at its meeting held on May 16, O O U Q' C O ' 1979, Item 01. following an advertised hearing, adopted Resolution No. PAB-23- N .O lL 79 by a 7 to 0 vote 0 member absent), recommending approval of the Q U Development Order for the Ball Point Project. (AKA Miami Center I project). a c= r- 0.T C O O Development of Regional Impact; and 0 _ WHEREAS. Holywell Corporation proposed the undertaking of the 6411 Point c Project (AKA Miami Center I project) a Development of Regional Impact, asTO _� defined by Chapter 22F-2. Rules of the State of Florida Department of UO E Administration. located within the City of Miami, oR a tract of land cf) (D containing approximately 8.16 acres located on the North bank at the mouth of the Mimi River,' comprised of 928.200 square feet of gross office space; 630 hotel units in a structure containing 560.000 square feet of g.ss hotel +i � space; 500 dwelling units in two towers containing 86S,700 square feet of c'. gross residential space; 75.000 square feet of gross space for retail use; and 2,565 parking spaces; and WHEREAS. Holyweli Corporation submitted a complete Application for Development Approval for a Development of Regional lop act to the, South Florida Ct'IT colausmu z4 or - 00 7 f!6! Q fQ 3079N4957 ►tt. Regional Planning Council pursuant to Chapter 380.06 Florida Statutes, --And did receive a favorable_ recommendation for a proposed development. order•on_May 7. 1970, as set forth in the Report and Recoamendat(on t of the South Florida Regional PlaniOng Council; and WHEREAS. the Application for Development Approval, .as reviewed ,by the South Florida Regional Planning Council, referred .to ,an offica building with 928,200 square feet of gross office space; .a hotel structure with 550.000 gross square feet. two condominium towers with 865.700 gross square.feet and a parking structure with 2.560 parking spaces; and WHEREAS, Holyweil Corporation complied with all the requirements set forth in Ordinance No. 8290 by .appearing before the City of Miami Planning Advisory Board; and WHEREAS, the City Commission considered the Report and Recommendations of the Souta Florida Regional Planning Council dated May 7. 1979 and each element required to be considered by Chapter 380.06 Florida Statutes; and WHEREAS, the Ball Point Project. as originally proposed by the Holywell I' Corporation in 1979. cosplied with the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan, was consistent with the orderly development and goals of the City of Miami, and complied with local and development regulations, being then the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance No. 6871; and WHEREAS, the Ball Point Project did not unreasonably interfere with the achievement of the objectives of the adopted State Land Development Plan applicable to the City of Miami; and WHEREAS. the Ball Point Project was consistent with the Report and Recommendations of the South Florida Regional Planning Council and did not unreasonably interfere with any of the considerations and objectives set forth in Chapter 380. Florida Statutes; and WHEREAS. the Miami Zoning Board, on Kay 21. 1979. granted a variance from the 300 foot height limit and granted Conditional Use approval for parting uses as allowed in Ordinance No. 6871. the then -Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance for the City of Miami; and WHEREAS, the City Commission determined that all requirements of publication and other legal requirements for the issuance of the proposed Developmt Order had been compiled with; and WHEREAS. the City Commission dewed it advisable and in the best interest of the general welfare of the City of Miami to issue a Oevelopment Order for -2- U U Q C: o Q Q) p LL ` U CD W U>L^ C O E Cn .( .r-� O«: I �D7C4958 the Ball Point project ;AKA Mini Center 1 project) a Development of Regional Impact; and WHEREAS, the Miami City Comission, by Resolutioni*79-396; May 24, 1979. issued a Development Ordtr, attached hereto as' Exhibit 'A', APProving with modifications, the Ball Point Project (AKA Miami 'Center 1 =project) a ` Development of Regional Impact. as proposed by Holywell Corporation for Tract D. DUPONT PLAZA (50-11). which project was limited to 926,200 -square: feet of gross office space; 630 hotel units in a structure containing 550,000 square feet of gross hotel space; $00 dwelling units in two towers containing 865,700 square feet of residential space; 75,000 square feet of gross retail use and 2,S65 parking spaces; and n WHEREAS. the Miami City Commission by Resolution 80-707; September 25. 1980. amended the Development Order (Resolution 79-396; May 24. 1979) by i) amending paragraph 7 of Exhibit 'A' to provide that the Holywell Corporation I ))) ` reach agreement an interim traffic improvements prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy rather than prior to issuance of a building permit and., further finding that this amendment did not constitute a substantial i 79-396; May 24. =L deviation from the terms of the Development Order (Resolution CL 0 t 1979); and .p LL U WHEREAS, the development an the north area of the site described in _v Exhibit 'E', ('Miami Center Existing') has been largely completed; and a C) N = O Certificate of Occupancy has been issued, subject to a restrictive covenant O Uk Ni addressing remaining conditions in the Development Order; and WHEREAS. the Miami Center Joint Venture ('Applicant'). successors in F interest to the Holywell Corporation. had -k—roposed amending the Development O Order to change the development allowed on the southern 3.01 acres of the site (more particularly described on Exhibit 'F' attached hereto and now known as 'One Dupont Plaza'l; claiming that such amendment did not constitute a suibstantive deviation; and ' WHEREAS. the Miami Planning Advisory Board, on February 6. 1916, by a 6 to 0 vote recommended that the amendments constituted substantial deviations to be referred to the South Florida Regional Planning Council; and y �J x WHEREAS. Mr. Frank Callahan, Chairman, South Florida Regional Planning i; Council, in a letter to then Miami Mayor Maurice Ferro. dated February 21, 198S, stated that the proposed amendments constituted a substantial deviation according to Chapter 380.06(11) F.S.; that the Council would appeal any D dec is ion of the C Ity . to the contrary, and urged the appl scant to submit an amended Application i4r Levelopment approval to the Council and City; and WHEREAS, on March 26. 1965, in pubic hearing before the Miami City _ Commission, the applicant withdrew the item; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 380.06 (17)(a) F.S. (1903) the amendments proposed by the applicant constituted a substantial deviation from terms of the previously issued Development Order; and WHEREAS. Applicant has submitted an amended Applice tfan —for Development Approval for Development of Regional Impact for the entire 8.46 acre site of the Miami Center -I project on July II. 196S. more particularly described in Exhibit 'D' attached hereto. to the South Florida Regional Planning Council pursuant to Chapter 380.06 F.S. Said application requests changes on only the �r One Dupont plaza project site by deleting the previously approved two towers comprising $00 dwelling units of 865.700 square feet of gross residential r . building area and 1.220 parting spaces and substituting the following therefor: two mixed use town camprlslns 150 dwelling units of 300.000 grins 1 ) square feet and 220,000 gross square feet of commercial use; 1.480.000 gross square feet of office use and retaining IIOO parting spaces. altogether _ .= 5 E 0 comprising 2.600,000 gross square feet; and WHEREAS. the South Florida Re•: nl ►tanning Council. on February 3. C) - U (D �. 1966. recorme1 4" ap; -oval, with .conditions. of the proposed revised project C) t- r 'One Dupont Floss'. as set forth in the Report and Recommendations of the O U oath Florida Regional ►lanning Council. dated February 4. 1966; attached as C� Exhibit 'C' and made a part hereof; and - p C' WHEREAS Applicant has . App complied with all the requtrementi set forth to C,, E ordinance 9SOO. as amended, the zoning ordinance of the City of Miami = ` C perltaining to the southern 3.01 acres of the site; and WHEREAS. the City Commission has considered the Report and Recommendations of the South Florida Regional ►lanning Council dated February 4. 1966 and each element required to be considered by Chapter 380.06 F.S.: and WHEREAS. the One Dupont Plaza project complies with the City of Miami Comprehensive Reighborinood Plan. is consistent with the orderly development of the City of Miami. and complies. as to the northerly S.46 ocrn of the site known as 'Miami Center Existing' (Eshibit 't'). with local and land development regulations and complies, as to the southerly 3.01 acres of the site known as 'One Dupont Plaza' (lxhibit 'F'). ►hase% I and 2, with local land development regulations; and .4. 0 WHEREAS, One Dupont Plaza does not unreasonably trterfere witA the achievement of the objectives ,or the adopted •State>Lead Development Plan applicable to the City of Miami; and WHEREAS, the One Dupont Plate is consistent with the Report ad kecommmendations of the South Florida Regional Planning Council (February a. 1986) and does not unreasonably interfere with any of the considerations and objectives set forth in Chapter 380 F.S.; and WHEREAS, the Miami Zoning Board, at its meeting of June 2, 1986. Item 3 following an advertised hearing, adopted Resolution ZB 58-86 by a 9 to 0 vote, granting .a variance, with conditions, from Section 2023. Zoning Ordinance 9500, to provide 3 of 10 required off-street loading stalls 12' a 35' a 15' and 4 of 6 required off street loading stills 12' a 55' a IS'; and WHEREAS, the Miami Planning Advisory Board, at its meeting Of June 18, 1986. Item 1. following an advertised hearing, adopted Resolution PAS 20-86 by a 9 to 0 vote, recommending approval. with modifications, of the amended Development Order for the Miami Center i project; and WHEREAS. the City Commission, at its meeting of June 26. 1966. Item PZ-13 passed Motion W 520 which continued the item to 1:30 pm. September 25, 1986. subject to the applicant's acceptance of ten minimum requirements as outlined by the Planning Department; failing which the applicant would not be required to appear; and WHEREAS. the City Commission has determined that all requirements of publication and other legal requirements for the issuance of the Development Order have been complied with; and WHEREAS, the City Commission deems it advisable and in the best interests of the general welfare of the City of Miami to approve an amended Development Order for the Miami Center I project, a Development of Regional Impact as hereinafter set forth; NOW. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED By THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Section 1. The following findings of fact and conclusion of law are made with respect to the project: A. The City Commission hereby determines that One Dupont Plaza is in conformity with the adopted Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan. b. The City Commission hereby determines that One Dupont Plaza Is in accord with the zoning district Classifications of Zoning Ordinance 9500. c. The City Commission hereby finds that One Dupont Plaza would not have an adverse Impact on soils, animal life. or vegetation and .5. Q LL U ) U Cr r lLi r U j _ O U� 0 U to OW 13919C4961 .further finds that it would have a number of positive impacts incoucing: 1. Up to 2.500 permanent new jobs would be generated by the One Pupogt; Alai& projecti sand, as a result. .nearly 2,900 - additieerl full-time jobs- Could be created in South ""T+nrida..with, a SIDS million- increase in total -wages and $184 ■lllion fn value added. to;the regional economry. 2. A net 'positive fiscal impact of i8.1 million would be created by the One Dupont Plaza project.-,_ 3. A reduction in the growth of regional energy consumption would result from the energy efficient conservation measures proposed by the Applicant. d. The City Commission hereby finds - that One Dupont Plaza would have a number of adverse Impacts which result from the normal course of development or can be potentially mitigated by the applicant through the conditions in the Development Order, as follows: _ C LY Ctl 1. Increase ,annual energy use within the Region by the (a C U O equivalent of nearly 6.7 million gallons of fuel oil. m. Q 2. Increase the amount and number of hazardous wastes generated p a C C) W on -site. O } 3. Place additional unfunded demands upon police. emergency Ul _ rescue. and fin services. w S. Generate 2,464 AN and 2.250 PM peak -hour vehicle (Miami Center existing and One Dupont Plaza) on the regional O a) roadway network and. along with other development traffic. reduce levels of service on segments of the regional roadway network. Section 2. A Development Order. amending Resolutions 79-396; Nary 24. 1979. as amended by Resolution 80-707. St9tamber 2S. 1960; being the Development Order far the Sall Point Project. AKA Miami Center I Project. a Development of Regional Impact. proposed by Ethan Minsky, as agent for Mism' Center Joint temture ('Applicant'). .for Tract D. OU POIR KAIA (SO-Il) P.R.D.C. is_,bermby_.approved with conditions. and granted and lssued In two parts: Exhibit W attached hereto and made a part of this Resolution, pertaining to the entire 8.46 aces .of Miami Center I (more particularly -6- !f d c.130T9N4962 described in Exhibit "0' attached hereto and.,made a part hereof), and Exhibit _p', attached hereto and made a part hereof, pertaining only to the southerly 3.01 acres of the site known as the 'One Dupont Plaza' Projectl, Phases Land 2 and more particularly described -in Exhibit 'F'. which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. Exhibit. 'B" shall be bind ng onlr anon ._ADal scant. -its assigns and/or successors, and shall constitute a covenant running with the land for.the southern 3.O1 acres that are part of the One Dupont Plaza project in accordance wig 9 of this Resolution. Nothing set fortfi to Exhibit f 'B' shall be ;binding in any way won the owners of,.Mtawi Center Existing, its successors and/or assigns, nor shall anything in Exhibit 'B'_ increase, decrease or otherwise affect the obligations of Miami Center Existing under Exhibit "A'. To the extent that there are any. obligations, rights, duties, privileges or liabilities set forth in Exhibit 'A' which are in conflict with, or which are substantially sinflar.to, obligations, rights, duties, privileges or liabilities set forth in Exhibit 'B'. then, as to the southern 3.01 acres, Exhibit 'B' shall control and supersede Exhibit W. provided, however. that nothing in Exhibit 'B' shall be construed to in any way control or supersede the provisions of Exhibit 'A' as the latter apply to the northern 5.45 acres. Section 3. The Report and Recomaa-ndations of the South Florida Regional Planning Council dated February ,. 1966, is attached hereto as Exhibit 'C' and made a pan of this Development Order. provided however. that nothing set forth in said Exhibit V. shall be binding in any way upon 'Miami Center Existing" Ithe northern. developed portion of the Miami Center 1 project consisting of the Motel intercontinental EF/R/A Pavilion Motel], the Edward Ball office building and garage and associated uses described in Exhibit 'E'). its successors and/or assigns. The Report and. RecoammendatIons of the South Florida Regional Planning Council dated May 7, 1979. on file with the City Vert as Exhibit 'B' to Resolution 79.396, May 24. 1979. , Ins in effect only as not superseded by Section 2 herein a- in conflict with the aforementioned Exhibit 'C' or Exhibit 'R' attached hereto. The sate of the proposed project an the southerly 3.01 acres of the original Miami Center 1 Project has been changed from 'Biscayne Plaza' to 'One Wont Plaza" because of a same conflict with an existing 'Biscayne ►laze Shopping Canter and Office Complex.' Mr. Russell Virth. proposed developer of the southern 3.01 acres described to Exhibit F. attached hereto. stipulated to the now change. an the record. during the planning Advisory Board Meeting of June 18. 1966. Cons*wently, the proposed Exhibit B amendments to the Development Order of 1979. as amended in 19W. are for a project saw known as 'One Dupont Plaza'. and will be identified as such where possible. Any references to 'Biscayne Plaza' are to be construed as references to 'One Dupont Plaza' and vice versa. .7. f� U O C R! U CU :' O p r U_ y U C O v� — r � O Section -4. The Consolidated Appl icat ion for Development Aportval (CADAI a: revised pursuant! -.to C4.nditie01 20 Exhibit 'B" 16 UCSF rattd 110r0% Of �...�.;. �• .. Y 041" ..40s .N rNv r1M rA wa—it".wiM Or the part in discharging thtir 'statutory _duties _wader Chapter 380.06 F.S. and local ordiaMce provided. howwr ,that nothing . set forth in the CADA shall be binding in agy•.way Upon the aver of "Miami cuter Existing• (the northern. doveloW.,portioa of ;the, Mimi Center I project consist689 of the Motel Intercontiwtal (FA/A lavillon Hotel1. the Edward Ball off ice building and garage and essoclated Uses). its successors and/er assigns. The Application for Developmmat:Approval. filed to 1979. as revised pursuant to Condition 16 h, of Exhibit "A" of'ResoNtion 79-394. May 24. 1179. resins ih effect only as i hot superseded by. or im conflict with. the &Iereuationed Consolidated t Application for Development Approval. Substantial compliance with the representations contained In the Applications for Devolopaient Approval art a condition for approval Unless waived or modified by agreement among the Council. City •and Applicant. its successors and/or assigns. jointly and severally. Section S. Exhibit "A" and Exhibit "B" shall be binding upon the Applicant Miami Center Joint Venture and its successors in interest as provided Main. Exhibit "A" shall be binding upon the owner of Miami Center Existing and its successors and assigns. Section 6. r The Development Order attached to this Resolution for Development of the One Dupont Plaza project shall expire on December 31. I'll if prior to that date the applicant has not obtained a foundation building permit for One Dupont Plaza. Phase 2. or upon certification by the Planning Director to the City Commission that all conditions of the Davelopment Order Ehave been east, whichever is earliest, provided further that in any event the Development Order will terminate an January 1. 2000. Section 7. The City dart is hereby authorized and directed to send certified Copies of the Resolutions immediately to: The Florida Department of Community Affairs, 2571 Executive Center Circle East, Tallahassee. Florida 32301; The South Florida Regional Planning Council. 3440 Hollywood Boulevard. Suite 140. Hollywood, Florida 33021; Ethan Minsky. Esq., Shea and Gould. 801 Brickell Avenue. Suite 1401. Miami. Florida 33131; and Jeffrey Bercow, Esq., Steel Hector 6 Davis. 4000 Southeast Financial Center. Miami Florida 33131- 23". t referred to to the 'WHEREAS" clause are *of. U C _ E _U CL C p U m .o LL Z' U A O � U E U) . ite: 1 JdT9K4964 Section 9. The City Clerk As hereby authorized and directed to record this Developmenc Ordes, tunsisting ut this iicsolution and Exhibits 'A.', 'B', 'C'. 'D'. 'E', and 'F' and their attachments, with the Clerk. Dade County Circuit Court; -pursuant -.to Section 380.06(16)(f), Florida ttatutel (1985). specifying •that this Development Order is a covenant-mmnfng Stith the 'land that consists of the southerly 3.01 acres that is the site for the Biscayne Plaza project and more particularly described in Exhfbit 'F'. This covenant shall be binding on Miami Center Joint Venture. its successors and/or assigns. jointly or severally. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 7th day of October 1986. ATTEST: U C LY. C �U APPROVED AS TO FORM AND Q) .Q REVIEWED AND APPROYED BY: CORRECTIE 1 � ep U1 _ ISTANT.CI ATTORNEY CITY ATTORNEY O co i r e STAT[ OF FLOMIDA ) COUNTY OF DADL ) CITY OF MIAMI ) I, NATTY NIRAI. City Clock of the City of Miami, Florida, and keeper of the records thereof, -do hereby certify that the attached add foregoing pages numbered 1 �Ibrough 9, inclusive, contain a true and correct .copy of a 2;6801utioe adopted by tja Commission of said City at a meeting hold es the )tb day of October, 1966. SAID RESOLUTION WAS DLSIGNATCD RESOLUTION N0. 66-g26_ IN NITMasd Yagazove I hereunto sat my hand and impre�so the Official Seal of the City of Miami, Florida -this 6t► day of Noveabor, 1906, Natty -Nisei City Clock �..1,11�' Miami, Florida -A P.9 ~ ` ':y z' gy t •I�'t a� t'1(1�; �� Dep y C ty 410'elk U C co �U �� U .c L U O r= Ory) O , 5 O U E To . G . AttatW to •1 a_ pwt actMtr ). 1*6 tosolotho 71-75: Myr 24. I979 tM�l�tlM ta•70); SNtwWr tl. Ilia t U crj U ac m 2' c o off' Ul_ a c "') ti. I. C. n, ❑03 0 CD Submitted into the public record in connection with on Walter Foeman City Clerk :a PIC: JaTgC5083;' b. Surroymol" Arta Improvements (Ouf1106 OuDon* plate) 1• $I bg Street bofvetn Souf1 Miami Avenue one SE nff Avenue � City cooks sopremlmately five feet of additional ►ignt of ray within Mat block tnet is necessary to Create Mroo waatbound lanes, an addltien of ens - travel lane. At tie IrIMI Avenue Intersection. f411 lmprav4mNnt would allow a separate Is" turn lone. o U .0 _ a CU Z $operate through lane. lane I E C and a soperett used as a CL C 4 caebination tnrougn and slam+ rag" to the 1-95 O O LL � entrance ramp. J. N w Cz O C O ' 2. SE a+o Strott between SE 1st Avenue one SE ind C (� Avenue fftttK roadway plan calls for tnfee travel lames t _ � C within till section of Sd 3nd Street. to be _ CG1 UO E U) constructed within existing public fill" of way. (Two travel lanes presently provlees.) T)mo project" levels Of sery Ice for .street eogxents In tie downtown oroe for 1991 mill still operate below LOS "Do wen e wlts tee proposed Interim project Impacts and Improvements. 1lowever. these I"i LOSS oo represent an Impreveeent ovtr t!me LOSS currently experienced In the area. What Soy be Meer• ineicaflve of flit 4001tl of tne. tronsporfotlon system In f.1IS 46 12'1 l case. are the lovels of service on Inforsectidlls in fna area as aver In Able 2=. Critical Intersections In 1*4 Ilamadlefa ' offos will genre+* en an acceptable LOS will Interim pnssing of the project♦ Ineopandent of tno bifurcated ►maps. provided t,14r . (Marla 100rovement8 are •med* ♦O the surface street network. f♦f♦[ a �w. •nay M1faB�f.f o+.M lrmaaexf w /w+F iw.�••�+ .n en �irl� " � a.an w M frf f.. + • 1 f w G • • , a ar `f w f4fewN + c • • bw M. + • G e � ! afr• ter. er.).� M. + .[ 1 e w e e 10 Hf M. f+ lime • G . [ . • few, w w G G t N.LA•♦1+• v. • • fro" Meow w u♦ f f i. Ire rage . The isolating structure Contains 1.150 Covered parking Spaces. rho prepaaad adeiflons to fne project will provide agproolflefoly 1.200 glvered parking soacas. All will be f ldcafod ov► of sight inside the building base on floors I-10. ' /orking access gill be via internal floor romps and a tour -lone I� a? 12 �b 5/ _V C1 '� C E t C C2 C ay O LL L =— +, � L 6- O C U CO C O U>� � C U , _ .� .2 U E `I307% 065 I bullsIN ariv• connection 10 11scaro bYlsvera. The signalised access drive elII be located Of tee naftaweaf corner of and prd;Odt We and adjaconf to ra 8411 attics, perking forage. perking control will be by both an,elactrOnlc Arta Sod a control boom. bof, of enICS .ill Oa located along Ma mein Wry -waif. 1 " iIn addlfldns tat project nss 1M par■ananf ►Ipx. ♦nrpygm ♦-e ! site purchase og►osoonfs to long-term leeae of up t0 600 [Z C N { adoltlonrl Corking spaces on the r malning fares -blocks of U V uL (r Dupont Alan lase diately wesf Of Me site. rlt*t t7ne 8441t10n j Of the 600 parking spaces 1=4410tely west of t1• prOjeef. tN O y C OD 0 }. provision of. parking snowld be adoaus+e for 00+n pr000sed Mnd 0 0 existing structures. U . 7. Mass Trgn!L s�5E 0 e0 .0., CO.) A aejor CMDW*nt of 1ne OlOneo ffanspOfta+.len System for t\e - Wpont AI.Sn area Is a rel land• on tat DOWOen ftGO1e lefvef sys+sm. The system Is on enlsrged I000 Mdt circles f" entire i dow+Qu" area. T!ns•alossst existing " station Is located nortaw s+ Of the existing 1411 ►elAf develewan+. as smown In i Figure 7. The Applicant's traffic assuRpfions heavily rely not only an significant transit.rldersnip. bur fpeso oil small percentage• Of grace level. pedesrrisn +raffle being generated Tsai t by SUC.4 rldersnip. Grads level peaestrlea traffic nears to be ' Ie .. 1ZoJ _ _ Z a T� 1 j r' SOURCE: AOA, SFRPC ME .Gr.« =64.;Lr . le ® lt�la AEF i ttttt t • ' 6 130 U L 5� C �. E�. �c a)C .2 L C = o o�.0 O U� C E U E a) Y I wlnlatltlae In order. to onsure t"tt aOseuHa, Iwal,s Of green ♦two can Oe achieved for the surface street network. Will 1a second story Oaooatrlon Walkways (" 0ilglnslly 00,0005" IF, the area) would a preter101e, Internal walkways wltnln the Nigel Center aT . area' sftyio be 8090jes to'■In(aIse the iitpacf Of grade Iwtl s: crossings., Ca T Q C: O { U U L N U r C: CU is I7-1 I i PART 111 CO�[MTS'HIOM CTKII AQ[MC1[S r\IS Section aa+telne letters ►Ke1red;./rcm oteer agencies on +". MINII- GMer.I Awenee0 ADA. .4 Y I ' w 1 i 6• c LL C O U V�a (D C _�6E :«: I 107CU 089 i lorida rr,. Jepartment of ',& ransportation Miami Regional Service Canter JAN ? 401 M.H. Ind Avenue. Room $10 Miami. Florida 331214794 _ a January 24. Ind ski. 24 (S85 _ Ms. Ane Deitter i Inurlm Director South Florida Regional Planning Council 1 WO Hollywood 3oul4vard. Suite i40 Hollywood. Florida .13021 V C Dear Ms. Deisur: -�' S C Re: Miami Center I ADA and COIPA I ItemNos. $113307. 4113315. $113371 OLL State Job not. 61006.3503.-2307.-3SOS ,� = C Downtown Distributor, tlfurcated "a and Surface Streets .� a) At the noting I attended on Wednesday. January 22. 1966 at your office C 0 r regarding the transportation elements pf the Miami Center I Application of C C) for Development Approval. a question was nised.aS to the status � canstrvetion schedule for the Downtown Distributor and Bifurcated ti C a. Recently the Development Order for Miami Center II expired. That develop- E merit Order included a provision for the donation of the rights -of -way —.r• �� p = E needed to construct the 1lfurested Ramps section of the Downtown Distribu U It also included an exaction for certain local street legrovsmentS ths: are Cn 4? �. necessary components of the project design. The expiration of the Miami • Center II Development Order. and thus toss of the provision for right-of-.ty; the schedule and cost of the 64furcated Ranros I ? S has substantially.ehanged prOjKt. The current Transportation Improverent'Program (TIP) shows that construe:ion of this project is scheduled to begin this fiscal year. This will not occur. The need to acquire the right-of-way has set the beginning of construction i back at least two fiscal years. At this time the Department is developing a plan for acquisition of the needed right-of-way. The annual update of the Department's Ft" -Year Transpo nation Plan will show a financial plan (( that commits the needed right-of-way funds In the current fiscal year and Schedules the needed construction funds in Fiscal Year SIM as follows: 4.0 * �S b or►. I _GTC)M5M rtt. i :I I, I lis. Ans Deister' South Florida Regional Planning Councii January 24. 1986 Page 2 Mount f.Y.*of VPA Item No. QescrioNon Type funds 1 's Coy+-'-e-t i $113307 Downtown Distributor • Intertta:e a-R Bifurcated Ramps Construction S33,600• 8719 . ii 6113375 Bifurcated Ramps Interstate a-R Right-ofaay 20,300 85/6 j $113376 Bifurcated Ramps Local Funds 2.3W 8719 Local Streets Construction T O T A L S56,200 *The Department is currently reviewing the construction cost.estimates. The unmapected requiremetnt to acquire right•of-way has increased the public cost to construct the project by in estimated 20 million dollars. Funds for interstate improvement projecta of this type are prioritized on a sta:e- ride basis.' Longstanding.comitments to projects in othar area may impact i i funding availability for this project. In addition, the Crta-Rudman Act and the pending renewal of the Highway Act adds uncertainty as to the level .of federal funding in the future, The Deparcmant'i update of its Five•Year Transportation Plan is currently underway. It is our intent to modify the schedule and costs of this -project I our five -rear Transportation Plan. and submit the modified plan for the annual update of the TIP. loth the Department's Five -Year Transportation Plan and the APO's TIP will be adopted in June. The Department has already submitted a list of proposed changes to the Transportation Planning Council of the 11P0 which included the modification of the Bifurcated Ramp Project's schedule and costs. 4 If necessary. the Department will ate action to formutlly amend the TIP at Nis ties. Regardless of this. it is impossible for the Department to Proceed with construction of this project without the needed right-of-way. Sincerely, cc Trams L. Thomson f District Director f-�- - Planning and Programs TLT:en cc: Jose -Luis !lass John Taylor Mf, ►«. I M79G5091, Florida Depa-rtment of " •ansp&tation Mw•.�• - ' �a ww� )t A ng . 601 icaner re M.A Su:ta 390 M—. Tiorida 33121 JAN 16 s== Jarssr7" 16. 1916 r r it. VdIlm Powell. Director rem Dada Ca�risy Public Works Dept. 111 W.W. isms cyma m w . ncrida 33131 RIr I-9S Billacated RA*s x,l.I. )b.r 611330 acsta lrojeet ]tio." $7006-1503 P.dsal Joe tb." Dt-93-1030)2 Comm dada Dam It. PWAUS As ro*mted by da 04mc llaza Todwdcal M--m4ttse. ft of Trwiportatim hu rev".aued the nev cwAgtual proposal for the I.95 30mcated Ramps ptspassd by Tvanepart Analysis Prafasaianals. W. arA da:ed June 1. 1913. It is as recC=andatian dtit this proposal be rajactad or e.s fol1avi4 basis. Mw aaatbowA and vestbard fraeua7 sapmts. SncLAing eta rags will not provide am aceapuble Iml of service. • Mu eastbarA off ramp to the p=r .g ianie still to S.L. 3rd Ave= are ..,, too close together. • lismm Blvd, amm siserom Blvd, to S.L. 3rd Stmt Will operate a: an unaecoptable level of service. A undesirable cric cmflpaatim of garage atssus at S.L. 2nd Aware and t0 relarimshLp wL:h the proposed airAl at t41t • loeatim. c We are prepassd to present mr reco=nVAtims to Lt tedrS:al coz::ae " at Tarr eammiance. u ?m read say f=,-ar watzseion. please feel free � to call. ince �VDRWCY Bo�-for ?:o&ctiw � 1t IDt1C:Gr: cc: Servsndo Pa:apar. AnCes Garpmta, A= Ncck. Kati Vez:e, Trek YeGreg::, Tam t1mu a, .im)ale:. F:.a rt: I 3079MSM2 F LOMDA : Dr.OF STATE Cftm Dm31Oh OF ARCMtv[s. MdTORY AMC RECORDS MAMAGEMVIT AUG 1 Y 1995 The C*"- T4114hm a. Morita 3=14020 M41 ass• 1 Aa0 Augait 7, 1913 In )reply Rater toe Mika Wisenbaker 81storie sites specialist (901) 1s7-2333 Ms. Barry Peterson -South rlorids Regional Planning Council 3410 •ollywood Boulevard, suite 110 sollyvood/ rlorida 33021 US Letter Of July 11, 1913 from sthan Minsky Cultural Resource Assessment Request Amended ADA for the Miami Center oil, Dade County, rlorida Dear Mr. Paterson: In our review of this project we noted a discrepancy between what is stated as the answer to Question 113 in the above cited document and what was recommended in the letters included in t,1e appendix (on pages 1f.A.1-1 and 1l.A.2). Whereas the &never to Question 192. indicates in the event any -underground &rchaeologiCal . + rssourass are uncovered during excavations, a qualified areaaeo.ogis: Will be requested to examine them as required by law,• the letters tram the Dade County Eistorie survey and from the rlorids Division Of Archives and iistory, on the other hand, exDlieitly state that &a archaeologist should be present during the earliest phases o_ subsurface excavation of the most extreme western portion of the Ball Point tract to determine it sueh asehseologieal data sxiate bens&th the till. She presence of an archaeologist (to monitor) - Construction activities in this specific area of the project would insure that significant data, artifacts and features would be recognised, recorded and possibly recovered before thsir destsucticr.-. It remains the recommendation of this office, that unless tyis aras is preserved as green space, that a professional archaeologist be present in order to observe ground disturbing activities in t.:e western portion of the Ball Point tract in the event Cultural resou:cas i may be present. is i• 13b - sate o (t,e Aru �� 65ti _ 1 C CL O t W LLL L C.)6- .r L a) c C: O �. _ o C. � C Cl) . 0 E U) Mr. lam Peterson Auquat 7, 1915 page Two it you have any questions concsiainq our coments, -PLO&$* do not, hesitate to contact us. your Litters*% and coapor#tios in h$IPL'%q tO.PrOtOct r1crids's azebasoloqical and historical resources are appreciated. .,406 George W. -Percy,. Chief Bureau of Uszoric Preservation G'O/Mkp Cal Garr Izeael Robert Carr Io ca U.O. C: 0 0 E '2 00 E (D Cf)2 i ' trite of �ii�lzni. ,�Ia:riAa _ tti aw-60L. $.-ass 3` �.... PLO".W"1-0w• I I December 13. 1SSS Mr. Russell 0. L. Wirth. Jr. �rr��1 Wirth a company 520 Brickell Rey Drive JAN`21 1988 Suits 1104 Miami, Florida 33131. Dar Ms. risth. ' ruts i caspaw a" its develepasmt term Are to'SO eelslseLtil:fS ! + 9w 1M samisdesea Ls Miami and the private initiative Tw have tausm is the dee'eimpwwt at simeayse.n"s, a s4o0 million sized- tlso msmplaM IOWA& Will be a we►rld-elaaa Mia+si laadmarh and t'.ie 1 largest In omr dnwstawm. Located at tale sowth of the.Miaai Rives Is the beast of the city. your willingness to collaborate closely with City officials has suds our job of review much easier aed will, i an ruse, result is as extremely valuab:: addition to this great international city. The city at Miami has always worked closely with the business s 2 i development cosssunity is furthering the development of downtown ` Miami. la the past ton years, we have seen ever BT now public 1 and private projects built worth in excess of $l billion. Biscayne plaza will be an excellent addition, bringing both world-elass Quality and employment to our city. is reviewing your project..w note several elements which are of particular benefit to the citizens of Miami. first, Wirth a Company,* aonceps of sized-cse (residential and retail ae -well as office space) will create a dynamic 'urban villags'.and active people -place in the heart of downtown, second, the saywalk promenade, which you will build with private funds and will open for public use, will link sayfront Park and the souse sayside Project to our Conference and Convention Center on the nlami River with b beautiful walkway, restaurants cad gate& lining your Project. Third, the scale and world -class quality of.your development will make it a Miami landmark and potential rival to Rockefeller Center in Now York. fourth. and gertainly not lots:, will bs'the 1,500 direct and indirect construesLois jobs, and l. 10,000 permanent office tenant jobs. this -project will genera:a, as wall as added tax revenues for our city and neighborhood Asada. Finally, for two years now, Wirth a Company has committer its private Capital 1001 at risk to this City -building effort and will attract S400 million of additional private institutional funds, all without seeking public financinq. public subsidy or Public assistance oths: than seasonable approvals; aft ettCtlleat exaaPls of what private. initiative can do vlth City sneousagetsent. 1� • C _ «s : E t. C o o LL U Q O c: C Ri C CO U E Ca O E Pic f i Mr. Russell D. L. Wirth.. Jr. I. December 11, 1lSS tags 2 " Due to its prima location. Biscayne plaza is designed .to take full advantage of our new rapid transit -and 'peoolo mover' - ' Systems, which make our downtown one of the most accessible in America. Toeing i.�eaediately on Biscayne Boulevard and with` 'direct connection to the.l-lS rsasps.•Biscayne plaza provides - quick and convenient.aecees to the Seaport. Airport and key area hotels and businesses with the msnimum of downtown traffic. he City stands committed and ready to advance the .prompt construction of the 1-93 'bifurcated* Tampa into Dupont plaza. This will. of course. require close collaboration with the State U -" CCd Department of Transportation and Dade County. Certainly, it is L one of our highest priorities in improving transportation access city"core. funding is now availabls foe .0 to our enaira construction and plans are !Si complete.. -- CL As you advance your project through the various levels at. (D ` L w U approvals required foe such a large building program, please be assured that the City will provide all reasonable cooperation in ensuring timely reviews and legislative actions which will help C O C Q you in"the realisation of this important project for Miami. C wish Mirth a Company, and the exceLlsnt sationsl developstient tease you have assembled, every success in the realization of"theBiscayne 43:S Plaza project. You have my whole-hsarted,support and the assurance that Z will assist whenever possible in your efforts to sell Miami to the international financial and F - investment communities Whose support is essential for this fn V creative -type of private downtown development. N E _ Very my yo L. " Xavier Su ram XLS3nl ' T - C Mc. �Q79tC5Q96 OI t. 1 MiTsO►OUTAm0,109 MOM.FIXAIDA OfMIOFTNI.000kTVVANAw+. DivtLO►MIMTAL IMI►CT Lw+vl�tt - .. MRaO•DAa Ctti'ta .I Ill M.W. /tail aTAtt: MtT�O �1..(rh.r•Mr MWW, /LOaIDA 331110M ., .. 00,31 3M2517 " .�I AUG -1.9198s K;uet u. 19as d W. Man !dawky Bollywou corporation 3M ::isi Cmzar U : cd , 100 QW;fA Ylata Y..�. i lorili 33131 t o RE, 2"'� CaTstas 1 - Coepliaua to the'liserfto buy U : Shorelim Devslopmt Rsvia+ Ordimlcs a -lo v C. Daar ft. Mrskys o = a 0 c This latter is is rafarmcs to project kt� as M Can.ar 2 td p how it vill be affected by Dada County Ord::s us 85-14 �Sho:al:.'e Dmlopmc Ardw) and Resolution 2ST•aS (Sho sUra Devel M t viaw V a let'.slatiam was by the County -asian in n, CU S maual). ESL adopted dsvelopemr ds-ds regard:eas c: � Won to ly WILlo:m . sta jurialSctional bou+dasias. — F a SA addition to tM stw&rds set:or'.h, a raviw. c*:r_4::aa has been s= UO established which is clanged with the rasponsibUicy-of each for:ulacL,% ice+ co w n? 4 ptojecc vishin the revia+ boondary and a recomenra a: to whethav a project confum to the spirit. and ircanc of tha ladslatian.. 4lTsrefore, bafora a" fi-Al Mi action ' is taken. the T6gdxenr.s i sat_oreh in the IniaLtlan v% at be satisfied. To uaitc you in L`_s psocass. % haw one sed a copy of the above cmtio:ad docswts. If this affics can be of mW ass:sume please don't hesicaca to earl F Unce:tly. David J. Saich. Coordi-xar i Shoreline Developmt Rrv'iav C -I free T Lnclor es C CC.' batty Yets:son, AICP, Srn?C Sergio Fatigsss, Diztc:or ci:y of MsW! Pit. f VU U U IUM - .i i E ram_ f o d'°ls C.t. �' BAN 3 01386 January 30. 1916 Ms. Aae Oeittmr i Acting Executive Director South ilorida Regional planning Council 3460 Hollywood /oulevard Hollywood, FL RE: MIAMI CEM 1 I DEKLO►NEXT ORDER Omar Ms. Ulster* For your request, attached is the current status Of the Miami Center I Development Order, with two attathm" ts. Also enclosed is the latest proposal for settlement of outstanding issues as proposed by the attorney for lank of Now York. For your additional inforwation, a memorandum to the Miami City Comission from the City Manager. dated June 12. 191S. is also enclosed pertaining to an agreement for the developer's use of layfront Park. which was not part of tree Development Order. Sincerely. ern lodriguei. Director planning Department S1/JWM/y Attachments cc: Walter L. Pierce. Assistant City Manager Donald W. Catner. Director, Department of Public Worts Ethan Minsky, Shea and Could Jeffrey Bartow. Steel, Hector. Davis q •��..G DI..I•W�' :q . v� L r �• � a� a. J)':! k! 5'b�w* I • E k �079��5096 tic CURRENT STATUS:, MIAMI UMM I DtYtlO►M[i(T ORO[R f ! i The current statui of the developm*nt, ai approved and as built, it described is follows: Condition I i � C=onent As Approved Al iullt ►hase I Office Taer 105,400 GSF 791.000 GSF Retail I1.000 GSF 96,297 GSF Hotel (630 units) (614 units) ( 458,400 GSF 669.000 GSF Partial Spaces 1670 to. 1145 to., Phase It Residential SOO units Not constructed iParking Spaces $95 to. 2.365 .to . Floor Area Ratio (net) 6.36 4.27 Lot Coverege 83S Undetersined Ground Usable Open 17% ►hasp II net Pedestrian Open 161 constructed Space at Main Floor Level 91145 regular spaces can 4ccomod4te 146S valet Parting spaces. "Reduced to 324 units: letter frm Mr. Gould January 21. 1963. 6<<: ! 1077 5099 . Comments art as follows: a. The developer may delete a Portion of the project e.g., Phase 2 rosidtatial units and related parking• The Development Order limits the �. project, but .does not ,ropuirt that all parts be built. A similar i situation pertains to Conditional use approval. . b. There is a difference between the amount of parting a) proffered by the developer and approved by the Commission -and 0) actually Provided for the office building and hotel. The Development Order *limited" tits Project to no more than 2365 parking $Pacts and did not make the 2363 spaces a rooutrtment; the_develpper may have intended to Oak* UP the shortfall Of 523 spaces (1670-1144) elsewhere an the -site and the .developer procatded under a valid building permit issued by the City for existing Miami Center I� c: Rttent information provided by the dtvtlooer shows that the area for retail and hotel may have been exceeded in existing Mismi Center I, necessitating cat 'after-therfact' amendment to the Development Order. The current .status of the remaining conditions and Compliance thereto is described as Follows: Conditions Developer Compliance 2. Project considerations: Compliance prior to issuance of ..riverwalk am"I tits building permit for Phase 1; Phase ..facsde treatment 2 unresolved. ..bay and river views ••podium landscaping 3. Riveroaik and layvalk: Partial Compliance: baywalk (Phase p' amenities, easement, dedication, I) tssement recorded by Resolution _ Construction and maintenance. /3-129; February 10. 1983. The construction tr! the baywalk surface has been comPltted but there is no landscaping, benches or, street furniture or lighting. A sS00,000 + performance bond to gguuarantte j construction of the riverwalk (Phase 21 has expired. Riverwalk *&sees•,- is being held to escrow by the City i C1ert, per Resolution 13-130; February 10. 19$3, to Pe retordtd when Construction is Completed or Dy the ytar 1990, whichever Comes first. a. Cnopin Plata (ta$t end) land- Partial Compliance: Concrete sub. $cape treatment. base installed; landsCtP'�f;, travertine surface and barrier guardrail, not installed. The Dtoartsent of Public worts installed a barrier a% interim safety ata$u't. �43 I .• ;I f 5. Mar level pedestrian ConneC- i Lion to 0CM.atation in'11 scayne lodltrard. -- i I i 4. consider upper 'level pedestrian connection between Miami C enter 1 and 11 i T, payment or bond for.eduitsble share of interim traffic 191- proremMts at a time tat by City prior to issuance of a /. funding traffic improvieents i adjacent to Site: -four traffic lanes on /iscayne loultvard from south and to SE 2nd Street and necessary } dedication. i -removal Of traffic island near SE 3 Street. -provision of traffic signal at SE 3 Street. The sayfront .rt Corps of Enginttrs project covers the tame Arlo, IC the travertine surface, lendSCAping and traffic baPriers (if rtquirts' should be installed upon coegletion of the Corps of engineers project. No compliance; the City judges that DCM station was constructed 1fr the 'vicinity' of liscayne Ioulevard and S.E. 2nd and 3rd Streots. 'ht current owners -Of. existing Miami Centeh I judge that this requireew"t 1s not now feasible because of the station shift of location. Compliance unenforceable. Condition Is to 'Consider' not to-roquirt'- A stronger requirement in Miami Canter II Dovoloom"t urddr has expired. Condition superseded. Dads County Department of Traffic and Transoo►- tation--letter of .April 21, 1979 (Attachment Al accepted developer Alternate IV which provided 'a) reversal of two tastbound lanes on existing St 3rd Street with forced left At SE 2nd Avenue plus an Additional wtitbound thry land on SE 3rd Street from SE 2nd to S. t. 3rd Avenue and geometric alterations to the I-95 distributor ramp; 0) t:tension of one southbound lane on Biscayne loulov•rd between SE 2nd to 3rd Street and c) a restricted left On SE 3 Avenue at SE 3 Street. The developer subsequently maintained that these inter{■ improvements conflicted with and wort suctrseded, by plane for the I-95 bifurcated ram s and the associated local street system.. ►artial compliance.• 352,000 credit for fiscayne loulovard work. Two other improvements were acconlished by others: ten traffic island 1n siscaynt Ioulevard near SE 3rd Streit was rmvtd by the Dade County Transportation AdNihistration (DCTA) for the Downto h Copdntmt of Metrorail and regaved by. Southeast tank, and the 2nd lift turn lane northbound from Yetcayne $oulevar0 to $E 2nd $trot% was cleared by the DCTA and constructed by Southeast Bank. The owners of existing Niam40 q�; ' 0 -Add4tion of 2na left tur• lane northbound onto SE 2nd Street. { 4 9. Dedication of land. equivalent 1 to the extension of liscayne ' Ioulevard southerly to Miami liver to City for public pur- poses. 10. Chopin Plata parting provisions 11. Provision of parting spaces for condominiums equivalent to Dade County Zoning Code. Center 1 have offered to orovide the traffic signal at $E Srd Street. Note that the. Miami Center I: Development order (now expired) by reference, apportioned $481.591 (in 1980 dollars) In surface street improvements to Miami Center 1 (see Attachment 91. The 352.000 Credit refers to tine 7 of Atucnmant i. Note the Interplay of Conditions 6 and *7; the -developer tact nsfulty argued that Condi41on 6 14s superseded by 10444uent plans for the I-9S bifurcated rant and associated local street system .and then the developer Was rolleved of SA41.S96 (•S52.000 noted above) in associated local street system improvements allocated to Miami . Center 1. as specified in the Miami Center II Devetooe"t order, when that Development Order expired. No compliance. but owners of exist- ing Miami Center I have offered the dedication• Partial conpli&Act. The public Yorks Department and Departs"% of Off Street ►arking approved plans and completed final inspection of construction of the parting area only, except the travertine surface mains to be placed an the sidewalk on the northsi:e of Chopin Plata, Phase 2 condominiums not constructed. The developer's original proposal was 695 parking spaces for Soo condominium units. The Dade County Dapartaant of Traffic and Transportation (Attachment Al cited 160 parting spaces for Soo condominium units. '�! ler+dtaer y �6:1ver s! ,7a�emaR_+ -add4tion of Znd left tur+ lent r (. northbound onto S[ end Street. 9. Dedication of land, tquivalent to the extonsion of litcaynt loulevard southorly to Miami liver to City for public our - posts. 10. Chopin Plaza parting provisions .k f 11. ►revision of ps►tinq spaces for condoniniumi eauivallant to Daft County Zoning Code. I' Center I have offered to pro vldo the traffic Signal at $E 7rd Street. Note that , the Miami- Center I: Development Order (nor expired) by rtfertnce, apportioned 3441.590 (in 1980 dollars) in Surface street fiorovtnents to Miami '.Center I (set Attachment 91. The .SS2,000 credit rtftrs to tine 7 of Attachment J. Note trio interplay of Conditions 6 and 7: the developer Successfully argu#4 that Condition i was superseded by substoutnt plans for the I.95 bifurcattd rued and associated local street system and that the developer was relieved of SYI.S98 (a w.000 noted abovt) in associated local street system improvemovits. allocated to Miami . Center I. as specified in the Miami Center II Development Order, when that Devologment Order expired. No conpllanct, but owetn of exist- ing Miami Center I have offered "I dedication. Partial covilance. The Public worts Department and Department of Off Street parting approved plans and cdeple:ad final inspection of construction of the Parting Oros only, except the -travertine surface remains t- be placed an the sidwalk an the nor" side of Chopin Plaza. Phase 2 cOnddetnluns not constructed. The developer's Original proposal was 69S parting spacer for Soo condominium units. The Did* County Department of Traffic and Transportation (Attachment A) cited -860 parting spacer for Soo condominium units. The developer, by letter of January 21. 1983 stated his intention of constructing 324 condominium units (for which 69S parting spaces would meet tht OOTT rteoendndation). 145 ►E�:1 079 002 K i 12. Anslysis of sear impact` on Cowlisnce: ilysis by C.S. Iverson jj L Marine Canauntties. Iialagist, university of Miami Rosenatial SChao% .fisted Julie 13. 1479, supplied to the city by letter ` Of May 11. 196'. However. information supplied by the i< 1 developer to the South Flaoida Regional Planning Council an August ' 6, 19/5 indicates that the seawall- . bulkhead Modifications have be" completed necessitating an •afte•- the -fact, permit. 13. Ktiticti to Oode County Historic. Compliance Surrey of project start. k 4. Complex source permit. Superseded: iaaWnCe Of tompltt '. source permits by State hit be" suspended. Is. Construction eamm"Cee"t in Compliance i too years (May 24. 2"1). Ii. Submission Of ''a complete .. - Compliance Application for Covelopment Approval. t CfS f C2 C.(a S O C Q (D . a ° E i 11 3307916103 A OVID ly Cov or RCA IMPACT AS31SUM RfMT -prepared by South Florida Water Management District "Nis! smoky " It: NIAPII COM I SMDID No.: $$-to$ Location: CItJ of KIMI/Iwo County sim 4. 4 acres Wating Lam Use: Office lutl41"tel/parkiag Urals (1.43 acres) Undeveloped (2.41 acres) Proposed Land Use: Office Its Ul8valsertial roltall'-hatel. .and resideftm0a u Wet &"are rootage: 1.271 000 84 ft office sees 304 OU 14. it. lWail Wei ParkieLSOaces: 2.310 metal me: 934 Dwelling Units: ISO CAI Threshold: Office Part - 300.000 z4. ft. MC111310N3 &Q R[C"ENQATI2!S The 1116MI Center I Covole"Nat of Regional laic% (DRI Is a proposed and part 1:11 11 oxisting officecomplex with supporting retai l, hotel, and resid Jal Vass located in downtown Mimi &If" littly"i say at Dupont Plus. Development of the balance of the site is scheduled to occur in two phases frw 11147-1991. In reviewing the available data, staff has concluded U:t,tm project could be developed In such 4 manse that regional adverse impacts would not be likely to occur with regard to drainage, stermater tBality, water -related vegetation and Wildlife, water age and Wastewater efrimt disposal. Due to .its silo and Impervious cover, this mject will rMirs 4 knoral hrolt for Its surface water Markagemant systes. At that tim the applicant will mood to confirm that the Meat 0441 Vats? VA Sever Authority Water Use Permit Me. 13-00017 has been modified to include 4A allocation of water sufficient to service this project ' I* with all ether comitted users. In addition, & Water Use Permit ulilallbe required from this District for any dowattring required for the subgrade portions at Us proposed construction. Q) CL O 0 U_ C.) 0 0 0 w. 5 E C (D III ith M ►ROJKT RIUTLD_ IMFONOT j The Miami Center I CAI is an already existing acid proposed office temples located en a 4.44 acre sits in downtown Miami nut to It usyno say, Barfr"t part. and Dupont /lus.en the east side of Itscayne Boulovard (see ' i Exhibit 1). Phase I of the project, knave as The Miami Center (sistiRl. is alroadzz developed ee the northern 5.41 acres of the site aM consists of ills [dward sail Office Wilds (711,oem ON s . ft. of office a e plus 14,750 sq. ft.. of retail space) the e34•r�ac svilltan Natal. the ►odium which contains 7! 000 $4. ft. t) retail space plus /00 parkiol latest. and ♦ 300•space oI%ict Parting structure. Phasesi1 and IIt. schodulod to be built In '00"'t area 1!!0•!I respectively, are known u Biscayne ►lass phase I and lisesyne plate phase t ton will be located on the southern 3.01 acres of the alto. The liscayne PI us /hue I office tswor rill include 40 dwelling i units. 700,000 $4. ft. of office use and 160.000 aq. ft. of rate1 uses Htccee two? Vi11rfncludestosto &6111M�units. 180,000`i4pft. iteoifiCt 3 l u1u. "A 40,000 14. ft. of retail $sat. Exhibit 3 slaws the Matter Site /ac for the total Miami Cantor.► project. At present the site is toned C9O.1 (Central Business District). The proposed vies are consistent with both the toning and Caegrth♦astvo / wi designations. • a This review has been performed by South Florida Water Menogement District to provide the South Florida Regional Planning Council with a regional assessment of water -related impacts of this project from the M itriT s perspective. This assessment is not a permit undor Chapter 373. F.S., nor is it a guarantee for said permits. •1cri C E C Ci C O ,O Q L.L t p a C c E O ZZ _ O V1 _ � O . C h = O E -gl Cn Q I'll' Tim r W.W_ W _ 1 ® M "f: i --,0T9rc51 OS SMECT: SURIACE WATER MANAGEMENT MIAMI- CWER 1 011 81.101 t Al 1 T t :R(saY(ot :UMR[SOIY(:: I II li en 1 er 1 n s • 1. oes a at a•—n�i ire s4 arm;: C. en.fiPAIN a Yatrrf dltoesall _:— t •� 0. a:A"—a"deua a�E•r a s ua• s o`a i— s s n ► 1 n E. a ra on tYt t�et (1) At the time of "mit application. design details for Ue proposed Surface • rater manageexnt system will need to is submitted. . (I) Tha applicant will need to provide Cal:ulations confirming compliance wit' water quality criteria. U C CCCS . S \ c. E 0 LL t w C QJ O O U O U�� CU . C �-' o E U) e g i t. J0I i 9 W SUBJECT: WATER SUPPLY AND OEYELOPMEMT MIANI CENTER 1, -OKI 83.205 Froposia potible sister Idurce: 7 Permit 0, Mass 04do W&W and Sfror AYtnarity 13.00017 (Alexander Orr/Seapper Crook) Permitted Allocation: 130 MGD Current usuago: 131.622 M60 (1) i Expiration Data: 12.13•s0 Projected Demand: 0.M MAD i ►ropoled MOn•IOtaOle Water Sovrca: M/A Projected Dowd: •0• a it AT / RM T TuM j I :it[SOlYEO cutcltESOLvE�: I ti� Intl A. o a e ass ential; 11 nfr n r es or u gee■ en�e t 11 soyrtis Avoilabilill A. n•l e a a a and/or Non- a 1 M L ations r un v fr Vr r r r fr ►f• f vfrff 0 lrot t (Sea I561=8 on 04" i) .«:1'019r,0510T NCSolvAulu Vttr u 1 v 1 wn :ATPNMTTM ew R SO v Pr:UMR y •. •• t Ouap OC8 rnf ' tit In R Ploosed)OPIUM 11,11, • S f n 9r•tPoft! c ou,o r wt t0gtn N/A (6�;s1 i �ltndlnq tf n N/A 11 n 1 M A r r nv ^ re t anttr■ 1. oral t u i0111t I (See footnotes an of9e 6J U E L C N O O L1 t v � C Q) _O C C p U tz Rf C U w C s� O U E CO 2? (D r. 130T9K5108 i +i t �•. .••..ems 6nwr7 ie M aY11llptlen In.Aeuse Isr a �Od 1f 1CaL10n LO LA1a Pertht eAiCA could tneresso its allocation sufficiently to sIrvtce this preject. U Rf N { CZ C p .. N .2 U LL C Q) � C C U y= y U�� C U v E U) a? �071-�5109 SU/JECT: USTEIWTEII PAMAGEMENT MIAMI CENTER I OKI //•201 ALSOLVAUL AT► TTM ;�ESOIYfOc RiRO cUNRESOOM I vtrste 4N1Y dew# two) t II Off -tit 1199111 ncY 104YM—n%mon f /. effluent 4110019 C.'•_ssttrtter(irta latr nw t1: T t_ III 1* t trc�s en nos M/A i4tivi locHien o retentton/detentton areal (set►aratton of SWR srstas tree rasttuater disposal System) L Pt tra er rtyt� i�'�i Fo�ot•eal era er route (grtun404ter rstAarge; late r4LMrtrtl; ttt,l MIA Potential or adverse eoict;s: (auattc77 � wentlty. t.e. its tons etI lyI N/S r Fria ns nngqr1e 1 n N w C.Mir IN Ns:udovs_wtertstt TS" on a or asardeut sattrltlt Yte/ttnfr 10n N/A /. Irn e n Td7toestT�o�'s C.Aggiflqm4l rgivicligns MIA _U C 1�C =� m U (1) .0 UL U � o U� � A � O 1 c W SU{JECT: EMVIROMM(NT MIAMI CENTER I ONI 85•203 I ;• AT I IIM T TiME UNR :RCSOlVEO: m ECRU (SOIVrT. I Y e t n Pity1 Cr N A i. gyalivya1 1n n n . n n r teeGlef N/A ulmor Ave our vers; aqul er LtGhareo anat: ott•) I III h t r / n 11 1 l e fy4A r N/A �. Ya y IlnAanGNeent/de9Lsdetlen) : N/A C. nanagoea.nt aGtlaa savage olovstlonS. butlers, 1ltteral lone$: etC.l N/A IY CmPat1b111ty of onoefed land use and natvrfl GnereCtertttitt 2 (11 (I) The Site has Previously been filled and no wetlands esfr: on -site. s7 c U •p LL U N U v = C. p • U�� ill . C - n 25-1 Up E ow • lnoreese POteole Water Ono westeweter Oeweno by en average of at„ C00 Sol lens per oey arm generate an average of 42.tons. or 149 cubic Vero$. of $0110 waste par coy. • Increase annual energy use within tDe Aeglon by f1e eoulvalon+ or l neer.ly 6.7 million gallons of fuel oil. { • increase the amount ow number of hezardous wastes genereteo on -site. • place adoltlonal u(Ifunoed Oameno$ uw police, emergency rescue. one flee services. • Generate 2,464 AM Ono 2.270 /M peak•nour vOntcla ♦rips (Miami linter e:sfting and proposed) on the regional r0410114y netwo•a Ono. along wl+-4 other oevelop Wt traffic, reduce levels of service on s•gwents of t,e regional ro•oway network. AKOrw.Mo et l ow e Based on consioere+lon of the above "wcl►led positive Ono negative IOW+s, it I; the reCOmamnoetlon of fhe Council to Po MIMI City Caaniss)e-j the+ the Amended A0911cation for Oevelopwent )pprovel for MIMI Center I be AP"OVfO subiK+ to Incorporation of taO cagit)On$ listed below Into the Oaistl t Oroer to n9 Develo0wen Increase thO probaCili♦ • � 7 of 0`eefi2111g posiliv• regional impacts eno t0 m Nlgata, ' } I, loop C= U O O LL O O {= r � � U E C5 0 C� E . reduce* or 1110enate ,adverse regional InWIS ., Aooptlon-of-e.oawe100man• . Croor (00) 91" a Cast altocH Ion aIf►e/ent from ♦fie one feCOameflead hbelow for construction of transportation Impfo•ai.ents will ft" be a besl$ for an 40" 41.Dy t1• Council. pfovldso ♦tat ♦". On Colo its fueOing end coesvruolon-sctNOul Ing Mat ansur• tie reoulreo IsprovaseMs are funded and will be Constructed COIACItMt wt+% ♦NO project, Pursuanttoa. i :110.06(17)(e12. Florida Sts+utes. i i TK AP►LlCAkr. ITS SLCUSSCRS. A001011 ASSIGNS JOINTLY Cst SE14RALLY WILL: eisceYna'Plate 1. InCOrpOret• trio following Into trio project design sna Operation to <D t- r � +r CO ■IritNl=e trio cwul Hlve Impact of proJect,trafflc, end its C O Ul� essocirt" pollutant smisslons, on elf tualltyt C� • Designate fVN percent of on -site empl0y11 Gwrwing 204ces, �• O � U IOCHet as close as possible +e elevator and Dullding CO =. .. entrances. for exclusive carpool or venpopl use. t • AC+Ively encourage and promote car ant van pooling by astatt:ariing a car peel Informs+Ion program. t � • Provide WtrONII, w1fODW. and ratrOnovH rout• ant sCDOOUI• r!d . Inform@+ion In COnv Mien+ locations t-%rougriout tie project. !"'1 76 15'1 7,_ "_ 'I ' I j tic. 307%"51► 4 ;F I, Design. constrict. awe n@+w•@I• .,a sroe..rar aM/Q�Mt srsfa+ . t N aw t+• f001o.106 s'taM@eas: o Piece rip-rso. temporary berms or otn♦r barrl♦rs.to Drevent i, ' alsCnarge of construction-ralstoo runoff to the Say. • Construct permanent berms or barriers. at least one foot above grace. slang the eastern ono sovtlern perimeter of tn* site. o Retaln'tho rwwtt from a 27-year storm on-sltr, and construct I, 1h0 project drainage system In accordance eltn all represantatlens In the ADA. • Revf@ any a" all barring *red waswbwn water tarevgn ON end gross* 1Mercepfors to a sanitary sowerl'In* of prohibit any and v all woshdovn or Project parkins gereges. �. Incorporate Into the gevoloonw. . by restrictive covenant /no lease or sales ogrowrwn•s. hatsrocus wtlwrials accident .� provonflen, 01119eflon. and response steno N as. At a minla%ast fnwse standards anal ll o Require tnof seeds within buildings .here nozaroovs aaf*riels i or 1429rdous rest@$ are to be used. goneratec. ee stared snail S be constructed *itl Im"rvious /leaf$. .i tneut @mime. to P 77 -3- 10 ql ss) A ensure containment and t&cllztafs cleanup of any spill or leakage. _ • ilaquire that the load.Ing/un 10.O M9 of any hazardous material or hazardous waste shall occur In a covered loacing/unlow Ing dock ■lt.4 a will containment. area not connec-ed to the project - drainage or sewer system. • Oron{pit any outside storage of nazarcous material or hazardous vast&. • now If* all hazardous waste generators to contract witn a licensed public or private hezeroovs Vast* disposal service or processing facility and to provide to Dana County PERM cdoles of one of the. tot lowing forms of odcumM*Nion of proper hazardous waste management practices: .a hazardous waste man I last: a salpmsnf to a permitted hazardous •sat& manegemeni, facility: or - a confirmation of receipt of materials from a recycl&r or a Vast$ exchange operation. • Notify any t$nant Sentrsting vistas of ♦ne Densities for improper disposal of ". zardous waste pursuant to S$ctlon . 403.727, Florida Syatutes. 7e 159 U s= C: = NO U Q C 0 Q w U- cv �-- o o C p V� - � p U E W .) M 1 1 i - a Allow roosonable-access to fecllltles for monitoring by tar . City. Coda County Mid, one Florid• MR *o assure compliance With this Development Orcor ono all appl-iCable bars ano 1 regulations. ipr the purpopl at this 0evalepment -0roar. a hazarcous Waste Fgenerator moll be deflneo as the Applicant one any !anon+ ♦gat r. falls under a SIC code lilted 1n Exhiblt.l attached hereto and _ Incorporstoo heroin by reference. amo twat uses, stores, or generates nalsfdOul 94/10/. Ilatarooue Wastes are oof$no0 as ignitable. COFFO/iv1. ♦Ox IC. Or reaCtive Walto$. including loentifled In Eunlbl♦ 21 proylded, no ever, that the uses In Exhibit 1 and the Westea In Exaibi♦ 2'snall be lrmultaneoully • 010n0 ed upon the 4041tlon or ooletlon of any or allof the 11/'red • uses. materials. or Wastes by .amendment to the "County and Regional !last• AJlalmeMt'Gutrial Ines' Incorporated by reference Into Rule 17-31.03(2). ilorlas Aaminlere lve Cede. A. Remove all Invasive exotic Plants from the Project site as ♦." site Is Cleereo. and use only tnp/o plant species 1peCltlad in j f EaHiblt } In futute OfOjoct IaMSC&P;rS. It � U .0 _ C 1ZC 1 ` =' C U C. N C) o LL � C O U� CO a? 1 ?0191c5117 fare a brofesslonal arCaaeologis+ on-slta during all earf.%ro►Y, notify Stele W4 County arClpOlogists Of construction Kaedules. O41ay COnatrucllOn up to tared montas In My area mere potentially significant 1isforlc or arClaeOlogical sf+lfaC+sare uncovered, and permit 'State enc IOCaI �{sforic preservation officials to survey and eacovrte tea slta. 6. Contribute the project.J lair snare. as 4614rmineo by tee City for fire facilities, 7, Collaiwete •If1 City of Mi MI Fire Novvment to ensure faaf approprtals fire safety measures of* InCoeporo+eo Into pro. cotton WA construction. tl, Collabor He vita the ftliCo Oepaf+men+ to Iocorpora+4 security measures and Systems Into +ne Cosign ono operatlor 2f +me project. 9. At fee fe aJe 41 Of the City, vifaln One year Or +ae a//ettiva Oate of tnis Development Order, *"for Into M agreement .I+a hN Police OeOar+ment to Contribute a lair snare of police c401tel faCI1 Niel needed to resolve City concerns.• 10. Enter Into an agreement vita +se Clty +O cont►ibuta a fair ¢safe i 1 Of Capl+al facilities reojlrec t0 pfovioe aoeous+a fire service +o tie projaC+, Of. in tie a1+efna+lve. pay a fair Amara Coatr'ibution at) U .0 �L`L _ C ctl cu .© L U O f= U � O � Ury, U . C — D M O E Cf3 ( N r1 Y«: I- 1 05118 pursuant to an adopted City Impact fee Orainlnce por+rining to lire service. If sacs impK+ fee Oralnence is aacot*a by *No City p►lar to actaintng final car+Iflce+es of occu+ancy for more t an 9ec.000 sauare fee+ of developaee+, excluding existing development, On -site. 11, Incorporate t1e following energy consorvetlon measures Into ?,if aeveloomon+1 G. Maximum flexlblll+y of air conditioning systems to cool only OCCuplea Gress (an a floor-by-flaor basis at ■Inlwum), b. Air alstrlbution using variable air volume Systems. If feasible. C. Minimum air conditioning energy efficlenc'es ([[Rl of 10.0 in builaings loss ♦NSA or @a,al to 230.000 Sauer@ tea+, and 12.0 In buildings war 230.000'louses fee+. a. ►un producing erees @no @aIOMen♦ (cooking. .Star nesting. e+c.) Isolated from Of conai+lonea er@ee. @. Computerized elevator control system in all structures over 10 stories. pt s= � c o .p li cam` O a C C O O U73 1__� O � � � v Ll- c !'4 c':1307905120 .- . 12. lAtegrate all original and su091em60,1111 ADA Information Into a Consolidated AOCIICatlQm for Oeveloamapt Approval (CACA) and 11400101t two Coates of the CAOA to the Council, one copy to tag city, end one cony to the Florida Department of.Cdwelanity Affairs wlthla tmifty (30) days of the effective act* of the Development Order. The CAOA mall be prepared as follow{! a. Wh:fs new, Clarified. Or revised informetion wef prepared sw ssduent 40 submittal of the AOA out prier to Iefuance of the 00, vnetlor In response t0 a formal statement of Information Meoeo or of"werwise, tne.orlgingl pages of ♦ie AOA will W replaced wltt revised pages. b. Revised pages alto hove a "rage "ter (A) - Oata" notatlon, with 'Pogo Weber" Wing tas number of the original pegs. "(R)- Indicating teat the page was 'evised, and "04te• /tstlAg the data of the revision. 13. rreDare M annual report In accordance wits tis reoilremMts 90e41►iod In Condotlon 27 hereon and subml+ copies to t;te Council. CNy. anC Florida Department of Co munity Affairs OA or before eaC1 anniversary date of t'le Development Crdgr, t C �C .Q LL a? U O C C U\ _ W J c v Tani 144. If s public sector flnlncing Pecrete nsli not been committed or. to December 31, 1991, "On. prior to-obtalning any bu(loifig permits for Biscayns Plais P1ass 11, front-sno. anitl soy Include arranging loans to. or bond purCtssas frtm. $00FOprlate gOvern•en• maencies. ri17,WC 1198q dollars$ to FWT, besa4 an an soultsble re:OWAfa0a0+•ag►aa+aM a" OMF W►ato parties WRICS VwiI {1 specify Inters* rates and maturity dales. as tms devOlOwOnt's i lslr Nara contribution to f-a BrlCkell Avenue River Brldga ! raplaCaaonl. I 140. Prlsy 10 aOtsialas My 1u1l0iwg sarmlts for /19ca"o via". la tr araat tart oama►ractit at t'+is 29000060 $1e✓c1t0a $400 atfltam w ale tow, food dw arfmatrata so prcrt of "W I —dowse rar/o" 1y►Ovaldna8 )Io-med in Am, K1), MI) ow K13 iw (/lPfH I far arllsalo rplaCesaMs mvruslly 40VOW MaM DY "W Cat a v Qooartsw+ Of Py61 tc *arts. A"I GCMt, aft S:Rr P98#11, t0 r-4 City, Prrfrprt 10 !. 3W.ObCIMS12, ►lorlds Statutes, ^----- VIC. If a public sector flnanclag pecksge 1as not bean Cowmltt44 prior to December 31. l"l. $man, prior to obtaining any building permits for Biscayne P1818 P-4ef/ 11, front-end, enlbl may IACi,lde arranging loans to, or bond purcassas from. sppropr)ata government o9wicles, 33.C27,DW to MOT. bated an an soultable ralmpursale" agreement amtOng swroWlHs parties vmicl small specify Interest. •Has and malwfty dales, as t-a dhalopaeWs fair snare 1 1 Contribution to fts poanto.n OisfribufOr Bifurcated Ramp syflam. f 9 _V �Ury v j Q) CL C O c� LL: O UO E (D W go err w:130T9?C51 23 acreages, gross sauarfootage, number of units. and offer major i Clarecterlsfics Or components Of ♦ne aevol Opment. - • - j 190. If a public sector financing 0ackag9':nat not been Committed prior A to December 31. 1"1. .Itlnold Issuance of any building permits for Biscayne Plaza ►lase 11 until t1O Appt Icenf front -ones. .nic1 a may include arranging loans to. or bona purctasYa from, appropriate government agencies. f717.000 to FDOT Pursuant to I ddd Cenalflpn tad. ! 190. ' Pursuant to a. 180.06(13)(e)2, Florida Statutes. a tlnpia Issuance Of Wil tlCataa Of OCCUDenoy for Blscsyne Plate until all Interim road Improvements identified In E,cnlbif a are COnseruCtea. 20. It a Public Sector financing package %as not Deem CcM IttsO by December 31. 1991. .;thole Issuance of any building perm;•$ for • - - 1Da Biscayne Plate P1sse It until t1e AOollCsnt Mal front-emaed. anitn may Include arranging leers to, or bond purcma$es from, soorooriete government agencies. $5,027,000 ♦0 F00T our wan• to Can* It I en I a C. 21, Is tlmoid Issuance of any certificates of ocCuOsncy for f1e Biscayne Plaza P1ese 11 portion of tie project until Construction ' Mal COwmMCOd On f I.e.. uPOn execution Of a Contact for . [ Construction Of) t1e DO.rtO.n Distributor Bifurcated )tamp system. U O Ly (CS E a LL Q) .r O - o 0 O ., Q U� o E 22. Issue a dtl Development Oroer In accordance •itn the following crlPerlat _`.. a. The O11111 Development Order snail specify: _ a The nail of tea cavelopment,. - a The mama of t". developer. - a The avt4orlt" agent of trio developer. a A statement teats - The Appilcatlon for Development Approval (ADA) Is approvedi or . - The ADA Is approved subject to cc•^71tions. specifying the tonditlons: or - Ths ADA Is denied. soecitying ♦ee reasons for denial and vianges In .tea cavelopment proposal', it any, ♦,at . would make if eligible to receive a oeveloororm, approval. b. Findings of fact and conclusions of It. addressing wnatler 1• • and ♦ne extent to vnichl i f i r:r O'«: f 30TRG5 (25 0 ?SO development unreasonably Interferes w111 t." ! aelleypment of file objectives of an adopted State land ' dovelopmomf Diem eppllCable to t1e areal end . e The development Is COnaISf•nt vlfn tie local lane :Ooveloomsnt regulations and 11• seep -to local t Compre"Malve Dien$ and l S U !_ C: e The development will to consistent wltl 11e j tCS v recommoveflons of tla Council DAl Assessment purwanf to Q Cll U s Subsection 340.0601). Florida Statutes. }} O u- L - u.+ (D • The development makes 'adeouOS provision for tla publle Y C O O facilities needed to Occoewodate t1e hpacta or t1q ti U� proposed develepPOW Or "d City CCM'ta In fie C Development Order to provide floss fecillfles tonal•/ant �- ,'a r. vltl 11e approved Q I development /Cle0ulo. OU C. 'a legal descripfion of 1-e property Including acreags. t 2�. Incerporate the C40101loafed Application for Development Approval. as revised pu►SUSnt to COnd"10" 12. by refersnc• Info Mq r j Development Cider for bileml Center at followst Ell l tog Pic. 26 R "i!ne Coneol leafed A001IcOlew for "oevolopment Apprwal Is Incorporated 'ereln by reference end ralied upon by tne parties In discharging *Heir s+s+~y dudes under.Chsd+eP. 380. Florida Statutes. end local oroinancas. Substentlal • Compliance wlfh *Ha rooresentatiens contained In the A0011ea+lon tor pevilooment Approval Is.a eonditien for sooreval unless valved or mddlfled by agreement eeenq the .Connell. City. end A0911cant, its successors sna/or.asslgne:" 2a. Incorporate tne Council OU Aspssmen+ by reference Into fM Orvolopmont order. provided. However. that net -ling sot forth In t1e U __ ,� Council Oil Assessmant or In t14 CAOA small be binding In any way ` _O uppn-tM owner of out am1_Confer am18+1hgo (t'* nertaern, ddveloped Q. v portlon of Miami Confer 1 Consisting of the Mrlllon ►btol. the O = O s 5 LL L U .� Edward Bell efflce building and garage. and asWisteo vsas). Its O S"Cessors ano/or assigns. O O y 2S. Provide that tna e►fectiveness of tne Oavolopaant Crdar small be Y stayed uW—ns diirilopment parslts tnerou or snail be grantee. ` until Weri ♦Ime as an Amended AOA, pro•loing updated Inforeaflon; _ (1) a) • IS .subm Ihod to +%* Conn i l . City. and Sf ete end an Amended _ Oevelopwe + Order Issued. If Bisteyne Alan phase I Is not under ConstruNlan or built within 1 years from-t'" Ofectlyt golf of t-e t Owelepeent order. Should fy oeveloowent Order be stayed pursuant to MIS.Cdnditlon, nnoMlrrg herein s.1kall be Construed to Ilelt Cor4Ifion 29 below that this Development Order runs wlth +ta lend. - — CYi and Its terms and Cdrditlons are binding an +-e ApoIICS"+. Its successors. and/or assigns. Teel 1� t«; I ?OT9PG5I 2� 26. Designate on official to monitor Compliance eitl all ConOltlOnS of t1e Da•selopment order am soecific•monitoring procedures-t1at. N a - minlmvm. redulrer • Develepmenf Order Conditions to be revte..e0 by to Cl+v prier +a -Issuance Of -any local develoomw permit. and. .. ♦ for any condition that Cannot reasonably be monitored es Dart 'Of th♦ local Perot" Ing Ono InspectICA processes. a notarized affidavit #raw the Applicant assuring compliance mitt SWCN ' Development Order conditions to be Included as part of to annual repert required by Condition 27 herein. 77. Redulre tlaf an annual report be Submitted #0 t1♦ Council. City. and DCA an each anniversary of the effective oats of the Development Order, vnlcn report asall include, at a minlovm: a. A Complete respoms♦ to eecl question in x hlblf 6. b. loentiflcatlon and description of any c1l" es In t1e plan of de•elep%*nt. or In t1e /epresMt N Ions COntaln•d In 1sp ADA. Or In t1e pnaSing for th♦ reporting year and for t16 neat year. 90 r v� c @ Q O U C O O � lie.13GTgG5128 j C. A sw—ary comparison of development activity proposed one .. actually conducted for ♦ne yaor. 0. IOentlflCatlon Of undeveloped tracts of land. dthor thin I"Ividual $fool• family lets, inat nave been'sold td a $aparats entity or developer. I 7 a. ,IdGn+IfICV+IOR and Intended use of land$.purcmesed. lossed of I� � 7 Op9,lena0 by 1114 developer adjacent Ip the D►Oj eCf flte llnta ten Development Order was Issued. . f. An as$essman♦ of the AODIIC Mt's and tDe local government's aaapllanta wltl tae conditions of apgrovel contained In •tea CAI Development Order end tie camltments which are COntalneC to iM ApofIce+Ion for .Development Approval. g. specification Of any amended ptl Application for Development • Aporaval or requests for a substantial deviation determination that were filed In tha reporting year and t0 be filed during t1e next year. h. Ali. In0I06+10" Of a cnange. If any.. In local government jurisdlC+IOn for any portion of Hfe devslopeont since Iltu/nCa of tog Developnant Order. 1 91 C �Y U � C n � L _ U O S= O C p U 'D C — iE -22 O E I 0 OFf I'OT9��S 129 1. A list of stgnlf;cM*'local, $tefa and federal perwi+s w91a1 have b"A.66+41ma of •nlc:+ are paAding by agency-. typeof permit, permit nymber, and ourpdsa of aaC.m. j. a atat emMt flat abl persona lave boon -font -Coyle! Of tie annual report In Conformance wits Subsections 360.06(11) fna (16), Florida Statutes. k. A copy of any raCordeo na+ICs at tie adop+ioA at tie OawelOpaent Order or any subseaWnt Modification flat was recorbed by tea Appl ICMt pursugm+ to Subsection 300.06(14)(c), Florida Statutes. I. copies Of One Of the following "CYaMtatldns of sporoorls•a disposal of 411 hazardous wastes .a a AelarOous waste menifest, a a bill of lading from a bonded hazardous we$+e tronsoortar IndiCMing a.IIOMMt to a IICSAaed N11ardOua woad tecIIIty, Or a a Confirmation of rocblpf of material from a recycler,. a was+• aaClange operation,. or 0-ior pafwit+ad lazsraoua - waste managswgn+ facility. r U C •� c: ZY � sv � � � CU Q- C rJ , � .2 Li- U O G r c0 O � C w. r, p U E err. I MRG51 JD ►t t. al. Any odor Information radutred by t'I@ Department of Community �A N ,Ir, (ocA) In accordance rirl Secften 360.06(11) and (It)). 1 irlortds Statute, (1905). 28. Incorporete Into the Development Order for Miami Cantor a floating a ,hovtng the project phasing. ,pacific elamen•s at the project plan, and COndltlen t Of the Development Order anlch are to be met i In each phase Or by et.+ef specified 04+00. 29. Reaulro. vlthin 30 says of tna etfeetive aa►a of tee Deveiopew Order, recordation of the Miami Center Development creep .Itn ♦ee Clark. Dada County Circuit Court, pursuant to Sac+Ion 380.05(ta)(4). Irlarlas Ste+utes (1983). specifying that tag Daveloplon+ Orc.r runs ■iti the Biscayne Plaza land (fie sout,,Ie►n portion of Tree+ 0. block 1, Dupont Plaza) and IT binding on Miami b Center bin+ Venture. Ifs luCCelserl. and/or afalpna, je)ntly or severally. 30. Attach copier of all a■elbits raterencad In tag DRI DeJalopman+ Order. U C `st tv v U ? C O U� C o E �� i:SMIIiT , r, p C:OC FOR Vaf't TtttS CO'('V' T afSOC U,'CO V17w taCw SIC 1Mt:'f's 1 f - r ` . ,t Vane patitidts F a washing and rinsing solvtioni eontaleisg'peatieidas C toper pesticide containers h 0 spent soa@phon• solvtioni or sludgta from dipping It Spent pesticide alvtions Or $ludges athor than toaspheat fras h dipping T wst esntainipg heavy estate C Vahiags oad rimsisg iolveiens containing heavy metals M wastewater treatment slvdses coatstaing heavy estate p' I Vast@ ink J ignitable point va tee Containing flawma►la solvents (Ilia% p@ia: loss than 160•y) 9 Lf4vid point wastes containing heavy metals (ce/sive, thraeij-1, . mercury or lead) . L Spent solvents „ ;till battemr froo the distillation of solvents M Tittfacies r a idwas from dry cleaning epi;stisns • 0 Cyanide Walt@@ T strongly acidic at alkaline wastes 0 Spent pletiag wastes • ; vast* aanwaia S Thocogrsphis wastes J Igeitable wastes (else% **ins lose than 160•y) 0 Wastewater slwdgeo containing pantathlefsphwnol, creosote. of arsenic v Vaste forsoldo%ydo V Lad -aid batteries I Valle explosives - T wait* sit 2 Other is 1�5 c .�c � U Q C N 9 L� O O U- w o=offC O U) . -(� UO E Tse'! LOS' M rorcrr�lui►lyoe>t wilt Ctrtluletl 11Ti1c OOOt• euc a.•r. Lr. �111•aNl: •ceetaf N:ef -' /11a sc tNe /111 /K tN.r of U •e[ t•••re. - *oil •K . t•.N C•..e •/.t /1 p1 I.... .66. .r tbtr /.....e •K•K M.•. t.e..' . tJ• e 111 IK .•c Case— I..I@ c..w.. 0111 .K lre....e.l /leek.1.N. f ear •••I A•i«te N11 1.( c—..G taw. Ftee•11. pee /111 •et . 1.•e CrtM hMIN. bete •K o.ee teed., •«ya I..NN. I..,_ 1...1..1 t►••I W tr. 1.•w slot /ln .K c•w.N IIwN«s s.l1 /at I.el ApNNIw /e..l.be NN •Kt ar.rt . Cey bewfy,4Hiwtlr, W AN«Ili - sal• t C... II..wNfet. le"eell/ 1. *—atw /r1. •t geed 61r/y t•ee••1 crM I.e•le e. its M..IN. IN 1•Iwl I.GI • IF. LIU M. a— w t«4a l..ele.e NII-1Ma11 /.a/GM fill be71 a Or Nt Ie,•Male. 1 tow t..1 c•...ely G bell SKI tN.«e/y Irrery e...M•e ' 1111-1lN: eteltKtlt>• INI Stall 11�I.e. w MrwG t�...1..11.. INI II/1 Crag M/Le D•wrl. ..1 lle•N.111• e•yIIN IIllw.err _ �te..t C.edi/lrl.t 11l1 Mlt Llr /y, A..• eley .r11.«FNI y. Mey It.1 at ta.lweplr, sac 1e.•.... oil.. rN1...J %.—A. are I pt/ Mtt II.N l•stY .•1 `... tlee...••..o, .•..e .— Grt• N.•.IIi•d r e �••t 1�1 ..weN« .1 ..••..r. ,., .N M•.• .►•. e.y ....•e.p ••r e••.. •.• • rlr rtir. /.••. NI•,e WIN e•••e .... ee. /r .••y 1•, aK .••e .l1I. INI .....N Ir e.•.w ••, .. . �!...�..� .•reNN .1 IN« FN«w ..•. 1«. INI• / M• .. •.•..e N. fK e.1. Iu.N ... 1/ M.• t«•e.NN w .M 1•t..Nr. r e •Most _� .10. • .eN •1•.NY•• .Ir•.1•N 00-113'7 sit L-k sleet� IrF• Ar.i.e l•. . INI INI It at s.•ley w G•.N �..d �... ' Its. !flit CI «. w pw•y tti.•. - Itbe Mlnw G•�••rw ..1 pw..N•r tlwG l.••.•1 e•N. lre.r tw• ".W •[It CIS IOst 1�I/t e l! ,M1 (ew4 h«1N0we !!11 U C= .et lr.. 1•.. I I.1 Ifal gigl.eN twee /•4•e .41 a.. w..1 . e..•,.• 1e11 l•.• w " e. !'ll fa la tbe. t.p eN..rrw••~ a—*. /.N l•yN 1 4 . vy.• a.01. 1.N GIU W fie tNt W`•N a.11. !•N t� tu.•IN er. 1N.« �•11. SIN y sb•. art t•.•M Mlle INI in truly Me. 11•, we INI to - t•.Iw.. N Mw t.w.. IN•«. e1 lilt Its$ N - ti1•r w s.Is IWw.• .1 s•W er... eN.••..w.a•C• 11„ Up w b 1• /•... 1111 Gel Owe Cr.•e*w e.e• lips t� MIM trFt• w e•/. . NM Met t«Fe• w two. at Sul 1.16 Seat eew. e•t.a— cNir.• •.•.�.. /••«. w. //..r/ I.le sea / Ml1 1.1. wd ft— w tlrwr Ie 11 lest Ialt a..•M .w... Ir.f•.eN •.N .•/ V/Hiy• w (rr.•e.N• Nsl. Ln �••• A•w e.•y . ltll Il1a Mtgt us" Iwtw l.e.e•. - aed tr«.eN fr.ltr., .«..t tW IN. s Jet le e114e1 e—..H erNtr• Ill• Jet," II•e1 of w Uda. ce.trte Mo felts t•.e.•.H Irr/r., .lt t�uG "lap• 0-4— Gall INI am~ MIM �I.t.e aei.e tr.Itr. lM1 aewq .W I..Nelr• NII l.Ift �.N MNeir. e.t /•Nrw Wo NN fsn All a•IN /io L... •.n• fit /r..1...1 au. 1 ago Deep 11. tots. Gv. 1.w.1. /•.. r s•. tN . Ie...ta—G le•f It• �.iieN a1 6r. r. (M1...•p "%a Gt/ �'• ..1......•.... Arm•.: r. 06%1 lot set t .•ry.r.1 •... f.IN t•V• Irre r. • a.t •1 ••.a.•. •1••••I.N . Sub-Mitted into the public record n connection vvi h item on /crri Walter Foeman City Clerk N!! qllow,w - Y...•� tr. M roll.. Z. W kit N •• r11.•p te.i 6-4 1•r • Ir t1.Y• 0411 q.." al ft" •....••., At Nit gAyw /rr44 I.r W 4%4.1 0.111«/ to..• N 11 .11A1It1 M Iti /.««. /...fy. -4 $.1. Is.-. tW.l ••t •••/Ie..I..r..0 11r1014 w 1ew t1. 1441 N.t A ICI /w•...• /a.~•�'� I.w/rd i1e1 N•1 • MlV1a/ I.N4s. ad N et w I�Ir ... tV.l /..• IN. 41"MeN t•••• •••d t4 1.11 q�p1 ••.\I•«1rN w •.re.1eI i1.1 o1..1 1•.0 4 1•. Ll•MrM 6001 AIN.•t..y ceq•••... ■•«ef le..er Iti4s1 1t..% kitamSe.-r.•\w q M./ q� Y11 •. rr •, 1.....,4Nr/., W Ile•\..• I.r ^� Y«I /«tiy 1•N N.• In eney. •.•rs.:r t•..I.y. - 40 tb••.gtw let, AIIMIq, Me11M. J+MI.1./, /.// 4�ep t.1«•y UIIN M.11dow Y.•1..., "Ic NIo r.1. Ir till tw•, sac Aa.y. w ac HII �.Iv.Ip Iw.•rl tr\••.Jr INI I11• r•r•hs Iylr., r1t t... r«Nr•1 w 1 l II11 ry� e't1 t«•.. t•e,•«. t le.~. t 1r Y• t1.1.••... tr.•.r.•r 1111 r.I1wa1 r.••fr. r•e.y � w t•.ly..e1 1111 Il P" rr \.r11 W q1 Ii.N r•.\1...1 Ir•N MI /1.11 1111 list Dom" tr«.r. 0 c W cr•.Iw tpifp.•I rl rw�l 1...•••b1 I.«I•.., I•.1 b•., ... ' ;t•� •11.01m M «b.• A.l{« t«I•. 261.1 trtl.t out •LAW" tO«1.1 Y•• W IwN. M~YI•, Jlt• .J 1 ••1 to rrl9l .1r\/« t«I ru«rfw N•• N=go t Weer ►.... A:.r r... 1..1. fet Y..... 11•o "INI r.r.M q/rM r...1 tl«\:.t 0►•ll.••r. tat /r. ho/.•N 1011 O~401 1.N1/• rr\tr.1 . IIIo gl"Ip •.r.•.l.y \••\{.... IIN 11 grr'W.i'11 .•...« rr�.{.../ 1\. .J I.el 1••.•.y 1••1•• rr\ •: W ttiv..« Miii/ 1.1.•.•I �.•••.• I. r1/ INI 0 .r.'M Y11 w YI L.A«.y• re•' . rw •1••.+..• .1.•••1... 00-113'7 tot ... 'AM.1.1.r Ms INI out Wool" a" too. t« tr1..1 t •r• INI 11•t � -. tlr.• «I /.••.•. Fw/4Nr 1«. 1•..•N I.1 hr••• IN• y tiw I..r•• t .l•..• �. M./.•1 /.... 1•w.•r Jf 11 t•� •.•r 1 t••.•.1 1•..«1.•1 ••. V•.«. MI M\w•I W /...w... 111• t1....rN r. 111• t1«1..... 1•.•wy N ' INI q�t rte.yp MIr• •..\w•, r• te.r.•..•1 l•.J•., i a••\Ir. v cM..ly, .y h•..••t W t.r••.e1 •.•• tl. wr..e Iry ••. I•..«.NI alup•«•r. i . It" /N .•.IlIt1 rlNw ts.l.r.•«•. pr..., I.Nr tW • al••• Or I«.., A«,=-1 NII Does h~" I i.N•\0•« W Y:NW •..neN 1.«•1«.... ~•J rM «• f t.r.««•«t we.N•• 1611 RMWIP iM" 1•..•1•NI NR• tad YN1y 40e•««, " N/• - turns tr/« t C= h..,,. •• NI! yM� tl«••Nd ...1 u1 \Ilw e•«, Ac NI• ®r1p ••.••�.N Y/i{«.r«• w .>.r' W I«. I•...••• 1^'Y 4\w• NI•_1441 �� /1 41144 Inc II• I N11 tlr•" RIr.1� U•• •.1. 1... tr•w.I.7%. ri.• Y.N.• - .• 1t tt~� t.ur.uJ U•.uN ly\.1y 1•««.• t..r....1. 1•.r.N.l. Hot a Ion W I..•••r•e•el kit rlen+ MN.1« l•.►.1y tM11�.. NIi �r.p a.ie • aY.1.1r Y+e N.y t«• , M...fr Ar.el.oly, t•...I.Y. Ny •.. A.«.1r 10.11.... •.. N11 It, tl«c.�« t NII NN rlww�o t1«N•.f. t.�i1 ••1•r C, NN r/pP H..1 - 0, rl( N"4• ML•«• 1 .11 1.1• 1•r••1 r....•N.. ••/ W A• L•r M«1•• w III• r1 AyF .11Mf� 1«..y.• 1« 1./.•• rw« M••1. 1«1• •..1 r••N.•••. 1•tl rlry� rr« r.r. , •••u.1. 11y qr�1 Ir • r+.ryl b••uh If.•r• e.. 1•.w /«.• •••...1. bn• eJ •.••1. •. I Submitted into the public record 'n connection tivih item Walter Foeman City Clerk rj .zz Cn w tlt •...s IN,1 Y«.1.1 Ir . INf 1N1 NI• 1•e.e tw, t.L•., 1...., w If.II« AJ«1. Iql 1.111s4 ►•N. w Y.M., Irs11IIN l r11 ■t•�II 01.E o" IM."p-p ••: Arlfsaf, w rt{..1, lr/1 /!l II• I�"Jii1'• /''Ills.{, a A{..1, lrll //Lois'• I..r •: f•. J"J., ••/ AIM 1i1 1.•. A{.e ly 1/f1 •IIN• C..ruiel I.IN • Los«Nr....1 a...w Ir11 11f 1 •IIN• teul.1 /e1.16 1••. LI/ Irt raN IIN •IIN• 1 YINfy w MM. AI.If, 41 /ItN• _ tr.. as.•1 HIs/1y, C•..M. •I&•+•• IS-$ 64 a..6- /Mr 6. e•11.a C«I MIIMi, 1 t1t 11.• ..so" a.• ... a.• aIWL...s, L-l..f 11".., ..1 Ydp• 11•1 all Le•.Li•/ey ey 0.6.4.4 6-6 ' 111/ . ~• IIN••11i•a . UI. INt .1.•11•s set t11r1.. 1-8w6. Ilr.e. 11.1 /. Ls..e•1e1 1-0-6. Ca.aN.l.. •or 1a11 II N.N.. .e.ee1{JI. /IMy1N Y•Ir, r1 l.11 t...•rl. r/..LN 11«Ire.• I.II Ulf■ lat. aN. s,..N a...•. C•11.1Ni. .Y.•eW /oils.. IU1 Iwft aN.e.•. fe Y/rN /{YN, .1.•.l plid«Is Zzia�Jy.. •1 hJ.e.• ez.. w Ie.rN.l• 1. 11 1• L•..r ..1Nd 1u.•.«Iw /..1 I/a.7 a•.I w I.Ms Y.«0..1 •, sMep I.w 1.111. ..wt1 C I•w.• IN.f.I•t CI•r.er Mlslr.. r/ awl/Mir heI«M1••r. 11.. II A b11.r•, C••rl Ne, w MM. L.I let h !H1 /tort Ie1N w oi111J A.Le/• .Irsl.w /I•• / CMIN Ic•.1 8«1 t.d..r ..1 q.IM IM...•IIMee, 1.9.0, «M Iy..Is /11r•44 1lsl.s .N Iw•J ♦let "IF Ft LI..e.l•t •.w4 CL..i..N. at WI I..e,•ew• ■stil... . %* &"tw tiN.ee1. w y.M.lew.l Osal..l.. / MC oita•N..• INI Iu al /.w1.. I.l IH. t..•If/ 94w1..8 I....•Miw !•11 I t•f1 I I..r•1.� Ylr.y ••I•rl• hl.e w (.wly .. , 1�.•1rN•y YN w a+•w. 1.1 .1••1«•• It 1. .� w J t•. s1..e w tr1, ILt ar«.sw•« /1s1•• hJ«.. 1111 le«... I --a w IrIN.y C.w1 • M •1•.•+.•. •1«•.1..6 00-113'7 •K �� .•.1• tr.•• 1••...M.r Ilfl 6 - N«I t IW/y• IIN l l.•w. tl.... a....•• l ar•••• 1.«�« •r.p sHNN1 III-HL1 t L•1.•1•Pit IIN t ►er e•.•1 /.«Me C.•1• 1111 Il r1 lot cf.l•MLc. ..J•, 1l11 .1 Yu. r1 N.«e«•1 CI./ I.J. 1111 sot Cerws 0.11 w /1«. I.1. /Jtt on Y... .... C-61 Ass, r.u.r. C►i.• 1.61- w a...L......... 1!N 1 )1. 1al •.•wNs ►••.•NN /1•iNpd LNN.. IN1 Poi / L.e•It IM«Ie, Not Irt1 1/1! tt I .L...1.• h.oi..l. Qr•. •, ■•, 1.y w Ye1fy a..fa..• 1111 t 11«. I«•«.., Nw1 .•«.1, w Yll.y am. tl«Nr Ullr..•d I llf 111. t ■ ,hJ«1. Nul bs. Yr1y w N•.1 a.f 1. w {..e.. t•11 Y11.1 N.•1 f...., lift I N•Y. w l«e N•.1 QN w Li.e 11.'1 ■ t.•. I.r f•.....• 11lf • 1/11 ■ Ne•1 /•w...•, It. 11/1 ■ I•.r•• L-11 w Y1..14 •1 1•.1 'IIM hw•e a..Nw J..I.r •I .I..e... I 1...•.• I..1. •.. w I.I.e1y J IMI .r1.. •..• Y.1•, •.. Y J Irb..... INI 11f1 at"*" .. Ye•le 1w� ~."{Y w ■N..1., IIN t M C.".. II•••• II.e. 11«1 .. I IN r oi1er... CM.Je1 A•0...• Rossat%" At 1.11~yYrie•. w IM•.oi., J 4.f.. •..• 11fI 1...e, 1a•. N C•.Ns ..111. _ IMI �� Y•.1.1 w 1.•.IM., J Y.Is.w1 F.• IMI t 11r1r /•""tI N• It •.....11 Ms1, Y.w., C•...• w t•...• B... &to - $at ■ 1+.....• IIN r •aqt nr1.....• Ir.1. «• It•«•y./, INC YI.1 Y« I•••.•y /Mt 1:11 .a r•yw A�yw I•w.• a..•1 I. •1«e1. oil. 1.1! al..y./. Y.•. .r• YI.1 Mr.My •«••1., Yr•, I• 1•. r11•r.• M�1 ra.r• I err .•1 •..r•Yr f«1.•. M. • � •I...lr.• .li•e.l •.1 Sub;nifted into the public record in connection with item cn 12�10V Walter Foeman City Clerk tic r•.1. a/r• I N«.l.olr f .•r 1111 sellIa••..I r w.1.t1 erI e..la.y W te.el. Iylr.•/y, NIw Ia«. I�•a•.M-I W M�. «•• NfJ a{JwI •.1 •..a e• t.N.we Ir alp.lwly a.•1•..al.l W . tat t..ru1N a•.Iler.rr• o.• tNll•••r aim" N LL.a.•d Iro.«rY► Iw,,~fy, M•rlof. W [•.•••! •! N«eY eNlrNa, -"a a.1.I./ It/a q �� ►o.e..1• INelb.y /1.4 41•n Ira Co."/" %.1•.. Iq1 n•a� " IYUYW• 1•e aa•NNIoI W Ae1iy •1 Itfe a1•i /.41 at e.• @$-lead Ilp•1• Nf1 Base" aer••riy W t•M.allly I•.Ne•, all[ a@"me a.1N•1 1.•I r••e1• W I•eY• N.1 Ie. J N•rga r {.. .. el W eL/.e.1 1.•I l.rrwa W e 4r.•...• •. ae..••«, NYIa.a1., W /✓alas y.Nr•.. N.1 sea a" W �yel1•• M.I.1 1•«.re1 W {.Mlle• 1.11 tu.•rI Ir.. a.l.t. a..•• II.1 r..:...gaf. ttilr9•.a W Le►11•• II.1 Ifll of fl�Nt r•••••., t1«a•, N.. - Nw.Me1 Jrr l.r• N«Iw er1e1 Nn Ifll •IJrra! aq.wrr solo..••, Ilo.•• a...., W Nw•1•.• /1a•1 /M•. Ifal ■w&^" M.9 L••e /IM•y• l allol•1• I a.•.Lq •4•a tr..r Ie.e 1.1 W tr.•r 1..•Illo, •M •.I 1••.Iw .a•..1 tla IwaJwe� e4N1•., /•.., a.N• W 1".. W Iloilo. eMlw Hfl al Al -on /II- W Yrol•ly II•/bl• IN1 IwIIrYI r• ai.l to".I• life ■N&A•refe .fora N 4N1y 1•ee.4.IN 44011-4ese: 0aur{/••1e1/•I •ee rreK Itlttill/ a 111 Aln a.11••.M, 1.1 -11e•1 a ... 11•a e 111 tM tevol -6 ar..eee Nwlt e•11 Joan Miu►.y I I•rlrl INMUAes•/• ul• 11" ar•1 IY•ey I.e.ery.swlY, etc t1J/ IM Too" b. e 111 lM 1No.ift Y/ 0-1 I1eLe1 a.wwew.Y 1:11 lM /66 r1 *.-aaU1 1 eI.1.••.w• a aN•II• Ir11101•. IN •M •i La1. Ir /r•.y.e I. Y•/«aw1Y a 111 AIM lr •I I.�a.y •rl •.•N NNy Ifll Aa/+t /.rely, Ir•ry 1ee•1 a Jle /.IM l«•1 1•r6oe0 .f/a s.N.a. e/11 or" 1-4,iy Mw.rl /«Ill,.o a 111 w•NI I./. M••1 a•••f•• Ir.a .1• e..lw rov• to 111 ea11 � e4•. M. /«•oae I:e•.erIN1Y •.al VVV •4••r [e•1• a.e11.y ease Al M •.1.• I.... r..1 •I.r M..1. •., N[ Me M A . •1•.r«• ./«e•1••/ 0-113'7 a1u a41 / a u• 1•r. _ r.a Nlr, (r.a//«N•1 t«•f.r• a f11 iIr •1•/"•• W II/Na 1•. N• a1u Arfe o'•wI 1•r•••1 M•.•••• t••N aa11 also Ault AI/Itee•.. NL../ r.arw..9 •. a/11 at •111 11 >.I..•oe• t.Yr«N•r ar•.. « eN.•1 Iw.• �•.M N11 NII le a •.a•y e•b.aur M**'k •oily ae ll / elN l••I M:Nu• a1111 B al•. e•«•1 / rar. /.••«•• to• • MM. {.. N•.. ' Ie11 / ae11 1 e•Ir. /I•.... We Net flat / it"[1.9.•el• _ M•y a r•N• 4••r solo, •0-1... 1. IIH • •ee e11../ I.IN1• •..1. ••1• Lw {.ra •.• f111_f•N `NI•IILu 4 f 111 A11 Llaa, p•. •. W,r.11 1111 AIr r•.. 1• e4.. N.1..• 1111 •Iwl Mro•Ie..I /.o... see: •Iw1 lM FNr11•rw. aw..l ft.. y./i.. so- f 111 me lM aar.•• e.•., 1. •..b.. Iti. a I../1 IMN ••... 1• •.•1 1LI lrr ... fee-i owes 1f•1 11f1 IM lM 4NI,te•~/•••t1►INM«r•.. 1f/I II.11 I..N McLN /Ne lNt ease r.ryl• feel..• frff •..•r1•r L.l•. •, arc 1M1 ll ar•...N•••Il.eer /•ee••, a•a.fl 114! t •...+.a" ♦ b-sh 9..a�r fy.•.w N• 1N1 t !rl • Ne avb•• INI s /rl MI te•Io• 1.�..1.• ba.•Lw co. N•1..• JIIfMI�NNlul 1•ar11.11{ fill 11:6 in 1" [.:. ......../ 1...1••r• ..1 awe fb«,y l/J Ir FI oboe, r/r•., 1... • •Y I lrr•y 1«r• .e1 fy1..1.. 111• 19 r•. IJ..I•.•1 1•rar, r,• I /•1 11 J.e f 1.••...• I If1 /1.11 r• •........ •r• •Mir. a1.....o.y t.r•.r• ... .no. •a.r+... .1•..,1„/ SubMitted into the pub lic record n connection wish item on IaU Walter Foeman Ciry Clerk .1 Isc tM• r..e• /...• •e••Ilpolr . 111r I ell llt Iw IL..eb{y, Inc /III 1.1 N.«• u..l •Nobly N••4.• /111 yl II«.r 1•• .« N«r •ry/y N••4�• 11.I «r C•er.•1.1 /\«yey\. I.., W t••.\40 IN• r1/ I. •...«.Iy W 1«.«1 — N••4u . tb..ly W 1elre•er. 1...4N 0. Ieellly rMl v1 ••1 N\•♦ I•IMw•, IK //el e1.�t1/ a•....\ W Nw1y.... L.l..««1•• reW.I.NN /let IIe. lry w 1.1•...«I« C•ee....el Co. w I.11 file 1p. sees«• 1.rs •.«.1 sees le«ly. A.1r« Mlw•e II/I I 1/.1 relll.r I.el l.. r/ I...•«I..el IN41s O..e•1 111. /111 t 1•r Iy W wr I..•.• N..•, M.•« 1« 111s 11.1 1•IN N•1•. M.•..1•NI. ��• r..«wIy '/11• /M IM t.y.N Mr«1•• l.Nl. re" Moeeely •.N.• I%•.•. Ac 1.11 l►1 IN.• l 1.1••.•Ir I.NI. tee... I.1./p.•.Ir / be C..".irfy M.•1•. l Otis 1t 11 1.1 11 so, I. N�. lJre•4.s • 11«/erb ler•1• sky.. 11C .• IN1 HU r•r•\, tIW, W 1•�br 0.0.10 /.. IN I•y.yl•.... W Irr1«. Se 1. .• .' ..• b.• 11 l.1 .N 11•y 4NIr s..•. ere I•.I.IIy t.y.. MN.• Nye W O.b.•1 •«.Ire., rlt /11• llt I Ir I.IIy 1•..I..el«.1 /••.1. •. 4111.4 ee rrlr r41«• NII MU h.s«.{« Os... Nal LMr•u br •I• .I..Ir •l..«NI W Iee1 sK M «.I I..e... IeII I• C•1/ Ca««t4«•4.1 N••4N INI lrl -.•r« seeded.. t��« Iep Nut hw1'- Ise• lw Ices•..« W IrI•«Ir I«•LN, Mc w1 lIf .w.•••11Y•q•1 W Ir 4e1 •e.r111• wt 111 1..•LLr r«.Iayled, •.�. ~ h1eNN.4 Nrl lrl 1•.s.••/ leer««led. h/1 /11 s4...1 l.0«N«1•• NII Irl MNILN t«. Ir IIIUN • 1/ 1•lIN` IIK 010erst MNICt/ I/11 Mul '.1.. W /e..e1.• /NI Mu1 *...r tN 1.s.., N.......... NSA...1•.•1 Y.wl•, l/ee pe.ry e.s 1.•.« Colo.,. er •r.ryl Y.y.l., •ceded. @rNlr.l •y\ /.e /.11 � 1.1 U Ye..l• w /L.•.•�•1 bedside., W.0 L\ 1. •seedy w �r •.•wl M•\IIN•. Le Y.•..•• /tr -ceded Pod ... ......1..1 00--113'7 IK lle.e. try•• Nr.lp lr N�1I-.No NII Pull NII IK 11e•.e.. W be i.IbN•• NU lr/ I.I•.N., Ise../..1 eel t«s••• oere...•.1.1 IS - •Iee 11 s.e. u...y /..dpa, me me •C • •.e abed\..• N.u{lies Sub ,fitted into the public record n _?connection vvih item on 1 Walter Foeman City Clerk CO w rn /r w• 4r1. ter..11�/l lo• I...t..t1t IN of st le /r ..loss., SWal wwlel 111s10 1f41.111.1 4eaw..amls-e.601I4 1►e►N/, MIe.. C..1 ,ra1 1.1v1 "/NNsa... 0wrsa1111s.—. Wessel. e[//else/111 Hte■Rlwel ..tl.. e.ta.N• 14wwe NIw1 ..sr a seer+1 IG.y. I ew.l 6.11e tame ,/e 1.left ►.", C.111.1a.« •1ooM• 11rw1 eN1l.M-a, foalls .Ia1r.y lea 11 tir««I Caste. il,laeM /bl... 1W11 Ca4e M.1 tole If.1e41 pasas/ �, e.Is1111.• N.rep« lam Was Csr. eel. 1.a I.o1,halt om N«I Cur rsNl�rM I.I . ei.. Iotw. "'. *also s[ r Wee tils.le.1/� Nl.1/rar else /.Ie"11 Col.— •••••Io1..l.• 0 00-1137 Claam .rat/tl• 10Ia...1" 11"f•/.1 CIst" #04 t.1N.• IM•'•.olo lays/.1 Uwl. reels 104" "pool CetteeAs N•o•lowle 111poe Meal Nro Sos.11lor. INS 1«I s•o re.., 4ttN1r 1.« rpHN" Irowl.. s11wt .else G.N.•.r�« .11111NIw 111N1rta, NN, C:elea -Meow. "y o• pbt .+. tam."# 0.1.1 Co,tre., WWI.$ I.o11.•.am�.1 Ca"Wwo' o .wove •sre..e• 1111.s. eel la..aoe1 CrNe M►..1..•e leal�.a •l.el. eyes• MyN Wwl.yl ' W Rol« INw116r. Ir.oa.. .1-0 fa s.lellp h-e.0- Ilsss.11 11t/s/ea tall►1Nill• 1G t.yr ta•N qr«I esys.le e./11rl, Wale. 1-0-11 oral.., Isti/ ee•r.r,l ' Cye.1. $-Ile. IserHss as•R.•N clew elav#411. If.r1 /s., /171 ira.111e. s...s11 I.o.ss �.•Il la al Sub -Milted into the pudic record n connection ivih item on Walter Foeman City Clerk 0 4..111« owe. ..1. . —4 ow, ►1�r1•.M.• U. plp.11 Gwl✓....Rl• n4gow—.11«I McMr.1r W—I-MI.<1r-1 11« [«.l- too— lull/1 '�r'�'/e w.p111 IIIr IM [/w.. y.1.1 , - I✓✓r.M •[.I1141104 N.c✓.d.l 0I/c, so— y 01.p... IA./..1.1• 0.4.6 1r11p.N .1111c1<•1• I - a. red crlvl ► ,1, .0 .• OWWW ll 1MhK rI... p1.1 ..q/u/wbo 1r.•a I0Ia6 I.r...dl /"✓� .1.61.1.• no— AD 1.�r.1.•..1• INIc •° I ." Ol.Ibl �I�✓� �'�1• qN r.�•..1 I.y..[.Ir16 ..r.•.• tume, Irk. f A./.I••.. •IM• 1h1 pl.l I it-1• /11<.0. IG.11 IkrIN ces"I.•..•MI• ICM.pN p1.1 - l l/wl• �W/.• I/l[wl• pl./ �•/ NI.Mh IfMy. p/.1 I I. w1• .»,. It 14-16 0.1.1 S— top." I.•/ — ►✓.«...I. III14 Irr I.N1 il.rw eI•.c• IL.MI.• 1.-1 1 / • 1//11... 1.11.110r. 1.1IA 1•.r 1«1/ � 1.1./«I• 1 1�11 . ��I.yI« h.9-16 01-116r0 b.►.w.l. I.111 /Illcl /r. 0 rp.l«• IM.. of 9.11! 1-6c6.40 p111•r 1r1.. Ms b/v IM• IF..•..l Wlc.• IWI. 1~1.r1 Iti.1<• awl lr• 19.Iy...« p 11.1 1-6-61I0 c•I.M• Il.ylul •h.11 to—do— IcA.-.1 /rI N�..r.. Il...w• Ihllw plr lrrl 1..1... ~11916 Me" Iylc! pW 1P1.- sl.... 1iW pIwl I..Lr p..11lr. D/r.• Nlwas IU..s, 01«I I..L.. rMl✓s IIl.r 1�. I..I[� pNI ♦e— .11/N11 .r, <r IM. fee, ./... P1-1 I I•.I..r .<M. II.N.. p/.I •Iw 1•. II•. /I.1 •' I /...1.. on —do 1'�....�. Ir.yl 1.11. ..1 w11.1 • Oe1.1 • 1...11. •1+. ..I i Sut);11ittt d into the 'n public record connection with item on 1 /av 0 0 _ 11 3 7 Walter Foeman City Clerk 1 c � Cn W Cb 4 .1 re•. �Iy1M` I11..111e e1M11 4d1e•. dINar.' 14r•.r 1..11 - •1.1.,1. \re• Il l.e••.1 .rl •1�1.1• q•. I1N11 Il..rl /rr.11w� Ifrd I1gr1 M el,l• Ow4 IOr1,Iw Wry! •y.. 0,r. ,W• 1•yrM Ir.l M0..,1. "0.• Owe b."1.1 B.w.ry. ..Ir"1• op" -Loll •�n.e.lwlllw \Ie• I6..9..114w1 r ....1• rllr.\rll. If/lrlllyd or..—b— owl" II.a..s•r.rl C.111..10 UN.,.[.r►.0 TAd.rr.111 Creel, r.11...1' Ilr.."d .1-1 CN,1. 1110.• It,.41e1 C•„le 1C.61141 Cv r_&.fw. s 14"Id lc-.*@"1 U.el— Ib.�nd fodlrr .r I.r11 16.1..1 1 n..... r r.• «« 1.. 1.. .. ... 1111.r 6.1I_.Ms . 00`113/ C—o" w. I194-d ft.yl IH,p.d•. Ca N..1w... Ud.. rdlN fldr.•w .II..N Irr.O" Iw11 f..M/. "Illc.11 Ws.• wit B.•.le••,as oW-"e food" \.MI Ig..l• •.Illrle 11h11. ,1.00, . Iq,.l• r..1i,e ldid fw"I 1q"1. 1"11" 11oo—lia d.rr..l • . 1"—se W1.o6. 110..Id to.rewl r.."/1w• "p.p/e Irowlsdo 01-11 tr�..l• j.�1..1�.,• IC.r 6..1.1 i.yMe Ila•I.r I114.1111 - M...Ile oo./ 11rr1.IM.". Ildrlel.. rw_1_ Ir...Mlor loll,! - 1►eR\i" oow. IV., "sort 11dre•l� Srwrl•.r ' . 11 IIIIr1 Ir• lidos yr. Iilq.. 111111 Ibolr/,., I46II119 1"-,, o11•IK" r..r91.... it- IMd•l"..l 4010 r dll, I.I16.11.e 1101er loss'l - is— 94.0.0. IG.ole..rrl II— —fowls _rO O.r/ rw, W1.1 1.4 1../..w..1 Ilk.& .10r1, i Submitted into the public record n connection vvih item on Walter Foeman City Clerk 0 Ab.tA• tr4111110 1hr./Ir1 lrlww t./..•.1• tN r•rr lt• Il•.Ip•r •1 . . !►Iww trlw l.• Ilt..• }�Itrl . . 1•tr./.•r/• IrJkP 14y-CpIb1 /rle.y ••V wt•.IArY Irlwl 1 ••1ty •rl..l�.••1• I�w.l Irlarl l 1pt4rr qt.• /h IvI1 a $,sop• r•t.l• Illllt /1.11 . . ly.rlrlW 1!•pw is' ./•••.i•M.•f . .Itrtlwl• 4-1101-0 I14•1k.1.1 /ltr lt• t.rllr• 1{•.It•.• .r IIt111•, MlMrt tl .1.••rrrly/t 1•t1•.l.r.l. law—, Ir•1 I� ' hwrl• M4t11.11• Ihwrld hbt. v1.•IIIN la.•••, ra.l•• n«.•..1• .►•t kt•• Ih.t• C1•rl nl/••rltr t•t,• 1411.trt, t•11•�rl�rrl •1•w •1l hlllr .t•1.1/ a-- I9o•t ttlrlt tlrl IH1«•111w 1►••dq••/•• IM«M•d1 Yhtrl• •p. U. ryltrll . h.r.t•M w.• Ih�rMl . h1t•rl•. MI LI.Ito•• /MIIr1� •rdl.l t•./.•-1. /Ilrtr •IwMI . •I r. .,.1. 1. wr.r. 1.1II r.11..1 00`113( _ . _ 11r•1• «•IW Itirdb, �11v Llrt. ►arrtl �•Iwb IWr � w Ir•11s Illr ll.y •Irl fyUl�b 1•rv.•.M1 k•••M• Slrl•rl 11••1.rrt1 kkM 11lrl.e••1 1�••• /rr•kw• 111•tN«• tMl UrtA.11r see", It.11•. dltvl fr lt•. r1/•.. 1s•t t••.rl- 4errvl• «t+•••10 ICE• IrM1r ICIr•••1 • ', 1•ttrrl• 9.1••616 IC..• 1•"pNcN•1 - . 1.1160tp16 /koMr 11•NNj�I., •t1 $"1— IIIN �r11• M1.• Icl.tt .Ir1 . 1•PM11• �1•w• 111PNIIt► . .. M«•.Ltt•y� j.�l.•IM• 14.1.•Ir •1. J.rl•.1 �1M•wk.1.411.•.•It1 11~� r...•..• If•yiAw vIM •+1 . Ira• 6I406r11v•i 11tlrin• t•[p1 •. !rl• 11•.IO—. 14r11.1 h.L..tlr a•Ni IIM11 11r1 ' •1 i� • Iwllr •..I l.t S.e r.1 yrr I Suba,litted into the Public record in connection 4Viih item on Walter Foeman City Clerk 70N, *514 1 A. Np-* *isle Isprows-0,41 P4 19 Ilro SOPOWO Adjust goo our$ on Mile IN an sawthbownd swroft% and Njust+fettle 3 lemal floods as rodulped. it starts tow wors.8 Pease" t',Vreq q@v?1*oun4 111foug't Ismos. Lane Pop to, in easily wAignmorrad 0100" at Intersection elf"In existing "Vemant Is" turn at Slodayms bulevero way prior to BrIchall Avenue "logo oppro"A. kwl*fy sighing and striping "trompovi section as redwired. J. S[_J"q A-e-Ve ova Adjust chofthellsallom curbing In mvv%eost COVA40 to vrowlso +vD westbound f4ra,ugn lands and three S*Wwoo left turn Isno$. plus vv free flow left turn long IRSIdO MCNIM04 chem"1128flon Island. Two Of the left fteft fares for access to I-", entrance romp hear 39 2m0 A -onus sma 39 3rd Street. a" monastery and am w1onol. Adj4G+m4A+ of Cron-44 1109100 -10MR41 110 aovt%eo$t wast. it *lee 011-00 three wwt%60%04 far"m I we S. fraftelflomed f-Ir"m Intermcf1em elth skit 14144 lines. (000 Sorastory fig" turn leme and fee though ISO%*& curtemly in piece.) bevies signal Road 4160'ars. Pedestrian features. overhead " L"Mor Slon'Ag. and pov�aht Sortings as peoulped. Entrance and exit drives to be cooralasted with MIH arts bifurcated ramp deslgn and City of Idiom, Public works Npartaemt. Geometric N te,rofions et project drives Roof Biscayne lawwwro bay and Biscayne Boulevard trey. Tills Is to Include revised drainage as Racassary. ovtslda avaaqMt widening vilron exlating right of way, algnallsatton of smIt drive ro be Installed whom warranted. and revised pavwwnf sarkings. Also Provide custom material and w"PrucfloR for approYlmately 1.200 fee♦ of sidevalks along project #frog# frontage, and rivervalk frontage,, end all seating, fighting. and landscaping. all for public 4. Biscayne BDvlevy►d Vey Access %advey City to "serve 0004nt public right of Vey for amar Ma is, arstbo,nd access roadway aovth of Biscayne Boulevard Way to extend fans 31 3ro Avenue to Biscayne plans project South vehlcul r traffic entrance. /rosefvotlon to extend of lust to date of egaple,tlon of project h4ee,.2. (Se p0 etc access roadvey mot 0ee0e0 necessary •o project Phase, 1•) Q n .» lL L U CD O � r OC) O U� v .0 OU E i b. Sutroyweino Argo lwdrovwggMl (Curlie• WOOM �11>01 �i 1� 1. b+d Stroot bv#vvem Soy#-t Mlowl Avenue and 31 Is# . AYgnyg City seeks apprewiaetely'flve Poet of additional rig" of way within this block ♦hG:t Is necessary to ;r Create thrN westbound lanes. an ,addition of one trowel long. At +no Mlaal Avenue Interseefloo. this L .• Iadrewaaan+ would allow a separate IHt turn tame. a,. ,� .aeporsto through Ism. am a separate Long use as e Q ees0inetlon threugh shePlant right to to the Ind! ' � U o"ranae road. .� O StrNt bwtwegn $ 104 AvgnuO one St 2md = O O` C..) Avenue Master roadway plan calls for threw travel lanes F within this sectlen of SE b+o !tree+. to be constructed within emitting public right of way. (Two travel Iwet presently provided.) 1 C 7 1 1_4" i - OaINT 3 KCrOSED CEVELO►MtNT APO swASINO C Office• Co••Mrelsl I' Assa (Sa. rt.) w+o+sl (Sa. r•.) Masiaen+I010 Miami Center 791.Wo 634 Units 96.297 0 Existing 689,000 S.F. Y . Biscayne Flats 700.00o 0 160.000 60 Units + Hasa I 120,000 S.r. IinCl. podium) Biscayne Plate 760.000 0 60.000 90 Units hue 2 • It the market IS unfavorable for construction of +40 150 raslaentlsl units. +1e AVOIICH1+ rill Construct the 300,000 souara fast as office spate. WCts ADA U O O L CUO O 0 L L �+ O C_ 0 tC! O V� ry .S✓ L's ►«: I ?�'S 45 IMIGIT d f:A:t of )::f::a s_.r.-:-.r1 Dt)AR: w- Ct c:`.T..z:: t ArYA:).s O:V7f::R Of Att.L•sc: ):ARs:aC A.:7 ttA�.ACL.Z= RCRtA: Of L= A= YA:ZR ).A:JC=Z`.: 2371 teocutive Cogtof Circ:e. Last 74:26ASASoe, Florida 3239:-1144 (164). 418•4023 lYaststsea 31C.061131. )lerida ttatutee, places the rospo�aiss:aty an the dsvo:oper of an approved devo:opasAt C! roµ oaal aopact (01:1 ter assaittiaf an aaaua: report to t.t :oea1 poseratena, the Re{ianal )lannial Coaxell. %a@ Depart --an: of Coaasnity Attairo. and to all attested ;*gait apeou ts. or. :r.t dote sposstled in the Development Ordss. me tall*$* *! a 4 vs3apor to aYaast tse forIest an sae data Specified is the devslopseat ordar say reosla in the asaperafy auspanstet at %tt davolepsogt order by the local faverassat Vasil tole &"a&: tt;::: As avwxstt*d to the loviev aponesea. 'asa roquitesent qp::u t: all develq onto a! goµanal tapaet Whisk have asea approve! s lass AYpust It you lava any 4Y0011ans asaus thsa re Wit N rgars, sell the Dkl tatarseaeat CaagdagStar at. 11:4: •ti!a333. . pleses *end the original completed aanVal lepers ti tat dosipgatad local $ewtnaant •itlal.I atctad in tae dwe:ap ar.: elder vita I31 copy t• so Is •! eke ta33ovsags al Us top Una: p3snAind &$easy sf 3*813416taaal a) "1 attested galan tine apagssest a) Division of Resource planalsf and r.Aaa$enagt Socess of Land and YI Nf, kM1$etant 2371 taocuttvs Gensee Cus:o, fast :allaha&see. tletidS 32301 ltiaaae loraaew. yeYr AnnYel ftatYa Ropers *flat tk• t usat provided Ilel AMAL f—.A.:s AMR. RepoftYnp to Rentz/.aynsac Reata/Lay/yeas Dev*lopsees r Mate *t DAU Locations Caty Co"ty Developers RaN I Company Ram Aldrsas� ft:*tt lseataeq Cosy, at*te. pip Cade U .O C LY C U � c o Cll p U— CD � C O U� �y C � .UO r r- °►f I ?079�G5146 aLMa-07.11, Page :tie 31 Describe say *%Gages made in the prop*asd Plan at Iw@lepmcnt. OAa•ing, ar In %h@ roprda%At&*" tissatnre sr %to APPisutirn tar Development •a Approval NAca,Us Doveleprent s: AGgse"al is ass secosved Gppeevol. please meta any aastots Isabellatia� $0torstnatisna) titers by local gavolmsea% to a&srus teen• uamgeG. bete# 31 a rompo a v to to bo mate %lam one sent met . asset!. as fabsblt 'Al-4 detailed dtociptsom of dean chooge and styles it the modified ass plan dtewimgs. SiUbt% •A• aboold also Stiffs& Us tdllwlap addtSAOS&I teems Lf applisable. a1 Doetribo eboagsa la tie plan •t development of Izatial its the reporting year a" for the ovaeogueat years) b1 stied any known Incremental 8XI tpplltatlons for /dvslo1seas approval of ta"sass @r a a@mGtaAtxa: do.tatias detirain•alom that vote $Also if the ropor%ir.t rat eat to N tiled /primp SAG mast your tl ASSat% a stpy of any me%lao of the adoptlts at a development eider *1 the swoot(ltat madt$Isstton at an a/eptad development •14e1 that gas rNstdod byY slit 4 oiopsr possaame to sunsonson 310.sft1/11t1, r.s. 31 ass %Alta boom a change la total gotitsaeas lursadtcs:sr. got any ports*" of %so development state %bs dovslopsaat Sr$ft was Issued) if to. boa %►e &natal% local love tmmo"S &@.;tit a sawDov*1•rrges% of soglon@3 Impact �evolopsent order far tat pre3ta%7 fit roe provide a copy of %be alder adopted by %be sahessag Ideal getatamamt. 31 Ptevtl* copies of any revised career p1&as, tactes•nsal $its }lama, ors.. got 11"Sously &%battled. so 3f a ttspoaa@ Is to be more tsu too or two aoateatet, asticf as.Bsbihs& •s.• u provide a Summarryy dempattGon of development •sttvity prepSgso &sd casually oemdoctso fir ohs roposuag test. smamplos Reeser of dwilsmg vast@ eonstrgeted, site Improve meath. lets sold, ant*& m4&61. cross tiger dean seassemeted. bell dls of storage capacity Geapl*%ed, P*SS418 Ntaimod, vats. wtes 3t a cosposse it to be meta is" *so measesse, sctash as Uassis •C.• $1 save Say SadSvoloved %facts of lead is *be dsvo:ryrer.s !@Sher than &moilsgoal ISAS1@-featly local Does Sol/ to a asptientlly er •eveloNr7 It so, Identity tract. Its Gut, bad:"::- buyer. hates provide gap$ vales Show the estate law Lord. Tsai% suySS set•# 3t • tupoAGt to to to meta than Sao coatings. Warn as to La 11 Dtsertbe any lend& puts%esed of optsooed edlatat% :a too orlgsA4. Development of hoglene: Impact $at* Subnc441nf to issuance of the development *slit. lotAttty sea&% .and, :%s $.It. Sad intended ass an a axis p:sm erg map. %oar, 2t • raapenae is to be act@ than one sentarea, a%%aoa ISA:cat •. l 1 =JVJ U C O O U\ _ G U E I 0 "I: 13079 G5147 DL�I+.a1.11 . Pate :eras 1) List say sesstanilal local, state. and [elect: Pe:r:ts vaica eavt aeee *stained. spplsel tar. so do*led. toting ts.l teputtag pegged. apesafy tea a{oa. %"a as permit. er.! ta, !u ary see. Mote+ 1t a fU�eaae as to ae Mre imaa .ns amotaaee. attstn as LAaaalt •. Il Assaea the {:volr"As 's and leas: gsvmrameat's air.- tanelnZ ssglaanee etN salr esstitasss of spprovml seatssaet :.. See sal tsvelepmeas $$dat. 1010+ Alessi u :s"bil •C.• )see astasam{ farm) 11 ptoal{e say lmtetsatlso •sat 1s epeattacal: reSitttt 07 tie levolopmemt Ct{es to sa tse2Med is the asaes� 2spet%. 111 fields • atstearas tatil[7lmf test all Persons save semi seat ostrtea et ue anneal to1ert as tealarmsase vita 3 srassataamm M!I'slIl " cif). 7s. (� Parssm sosyletaml.tae 4aastlon"tra+� a 0�+ 0 LL L V C) C= c0 lspteseatinst C O U ) �y C €— '2 o E T , Q J 'rr , 7079�15148 F, ' ErH161T ••9' The tt+S1t4_deyeloDment site. consisting of Miami Center Cxist nq an ae&ynn1iai (as proposed) is described as follows Tract 00,' DU POND PLAZA, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 50 at Page 11 of the Public Records of Dade County, Placid&, being core particularly described as followas login at a point 25.00 feet South of tho Monument Line of Southeast 2nd Street extended Lastecly and 1067.24 feet Cast of the Monument Line of Southeast 2nd Avenue and tun Cast, parallel to and 25.00 feet South of the Monument Line of Southeast 2nd Street extended fat 643.14 felts thence South 0 degrees 04 minutes 07 seconds Cast for 352.27 feet to a Point of Cucvaturas.thence Southwesterly along a Circular Curve to the right, having a radius of 63.16 feet and a central angle of 71 degrees 02 minutes St seconds, for an ace distance of $0.10 foot to a Point of Tangencys thence South 70 degcoos 56 minutes 32 seconds Best for 73.53 foots thence South 70 degrees S6 minutes 36 seconds best foc 744.56 feet (last mentioned five courses being coincident with the boundary of the &tote- mentioned plat of DL PONT PLASA)s thence North (radial to the next described curve) fog- 34.61 foots thence Northeasterly and Northerly &long a circular curve to the left having a radius of 112.50 feet and & central angle of 90 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds for an ate distance of 176.715 test to a Point of Tangeneys thence North for 377.00 feet to a Point of Cutvatutes thence Northeasterly along a circular carve to the tight, having a radius of 300.00 foot and a control angle of 21 degcoss 34 minutes 00 seconds for an ace distance of 249.37 foot to a Point of Compound Cucvatutes thence Northeasterly along a circular curve 'to the right, having a radius of 25.00 feet and a central angle of 61 degrees 26 minutes 00•9econds fog an are distance of 26.91 feet to the Point of Beginning, lying and being in the City of Miasi, Dade County, Florida. V C ,Le LL 0 C C y O Q _ � O U) O +7r5 I�Qt9P�5149 �, :'.emu-`'�' . ,.•_ : '.• j ED4181T 'E' That portion of the property containing Miami Center fsisting is described as tollowas seine that portion of Tract D. Block 1. •dupont Plasa.• according to plat thereof as recorded in Plot Book 30 at page 11, of the Public Records of Dade County, Plorida, being more particularly described as followss Begin at the Northeast Corner of said Tract D and U run Hest along the North line of ?tact D for U $43.94 feet to a Point of Curvatures thence C2 fouthvestetly along a circular curve to the left C o a U having a radius of 23.00 tact And a wntral angle N •- U of 91 degross 29 minutes 00 seconds for an arc distant: of 26.81 feet to a Point of Compound Curvatures thence Southerly along a circular o curve to the left having a radius of 300.00 feet C O o y and a central angle of 29 degrees 34 minute: 00 "— U **condo for an are distance of 149.37 feet to a 70 Posit of Tangency: thence South for 293.30 feet (said last mentioned four courses being ,C coincident with the bounderpp lints of said Tract _ ' D)s tbanCW test for 17f.a1 feets thence North for O 1S0.00 feats thence Last for 5223.36 foots thence E North 0 degrees Oa minutes 07 seconds West along U Y the Last line of said Tract D for 300.00 feet to the Point of Beginning, lying and being in the City of Miami. Dade County, Florida. 193 ..r.r . "r�r. •--S1\�:� A'. \'J :'fir 1. rr � r r \ . r ►F. �Ui9P^5150 E14151T 'F' That portion of the property containing Bisesyne Plara, as proposed, is described as follows$ Being that portion of Tract 0, Block 1, 'du Pont j Plash', according to the pplat thereof as recorded In Plat Book SO at Page 11 of the Public R*COrdaCti of bade Countyy. Florida, more particularly % a) C described as to was __ U 1� Co"oftco at the Northeast Corner of said Tract C lL Z� •00 and tan South 0 degrees 06 ainut*s 07second *0*, test, along the test line of said Tract 0 , for tl X V C) 200.00 foot to the Point of Beginning of the = parcel hereinafter d*acribeds thence Continue ' C) CO South 0 degrees 06 ■mutes 07 seconds test along 1_ the Last line of said Tract *DO for $2.27 feet to 0 a Point of Curvatures thence Southwesterly along E a Circular Curve to the right having a radius of a C 43.16 feet and a central angle of 71 degrees 02 � minutes 39 seconds for an are distance of $0.50 L foot to a Point t.f Tangeneyr thence South 70 C: 0 E degrees 30 aleutes 32 seconds hest for 73.53 i d) foots thence South 70 degrees SS minutes 26 M —�- second! West for 926.59 feet$ (said last �! mentioned five courses being coincident with the �. . „ boundary lines of said Tract •D•) thence North along the tasterly light -of -Nay line of Bi.-•V:a Boulevard and its Southerly ptolongatio t�: 101.81 foots thence Last for 179.41 feats :.none., North for 150.00 feetr thence tact fat $25.26 feet to the Point of Beginning, lying and being In the City of Niami, Dade County, rlotida. ,ammo . ap"M mamas ant ar an own. n,sn► amaa MOM " C '"t � r G • - ...� Feb101.. RPC/bbb 7/24/79 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION CALLING AND PROVIDING FOR A SPECIAL MUNICIPAL RLKCTION TO BE HELD ON TKB 10TM DAY OF SOPTENDMR, 1979, FOR THE PURPOSE OP SUBMITTING TO THE QUAI,trISD BLSCTORS OF THU CITY Or MIAMI FOR THEIR APPROVAL OR DISAPPROVAL, A HRASURT KNOWN AS "CHARTER AMENDMENT NO. 10, AMENDING SECTION 3(f) OP THE CHARTER OF TUB CITY OP MIAMI, FLORIDA, BY PROHIBITING THE LEASING OR MAXIMO OF NAMAGRf10NT CONTRACTS FOR AN; CITY WATERFRONT PROPERTY VITH PRIVATE FIRMS OR PUROONSt WITH THE RXCRDTI09 OF (1) THE CITY OF MIAMI/UNIVSRSITY 07 RIAMI JAMES L. KNIGHT rHTERNATIONAL CENTER AND HOTEL FACILIT INCLUDING ALL IMPROVBMCHTS THNSCON, (2) AUY PROJECT, THE FINANCING OF WHICH HAS BEEN PROVIDED BY THE AUTHORISATION OF HOURS TO BE ISSUED BY TUS CITY OF MIAMI, WHICH LLASRB AND CONTRACTS WOULD PR VRNT REASONABLE PUBLIC ACCESS TO THE WATUR OR WHICH WOULD WOULD PREVENT PUBLIC USE OF SUCH WATERFRONT PROPERTY, OR WHICH WOULD NOT RESULT IN A FAIR RETURN TO THE CITY B-AShD ON TWO INDSPENOBNT APPRAISALS, OR WHICH WOULD PERMIT USE OF SUCH PROPERTY NOT AUTHORIZED UNDER TBB THEN EXISTING MASTER PLAN OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, OR NOTCH LEASE OR CONTRACT WAS NOT SUBJECT TO COMPETITIVE BID OR COMPETITIVE NKGOTIATIONS, SAID CHARTER AMENDMENT ALSO PROHIBITING EXTENSION OR 9ODI- FICATION OP ANY EXISTING SUCU LP.ASR OR MANAG049NT AGREEMENT WHICH DOES NOT COMPLY WITU RACK OF TUB ABOVE RSQUIRFMBNTS, UNLESS SUCH PROPOSBD EXTENSION OR MODIFICATION HAS FIRST PEEN APPROVED BY A MAJORITY OF THE VOTERS Or THE CITY 00 MIAMIr AND A NSASURS KNOWN AS "CHARTER A14ENDMBNT wo . 20, AMENDING SECTION 3(4) OF THE CHARTER OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BY PROVIDING FOR BUILDING PLACEMENT LIMITATIONS UPON PROPERTY LOCATED ON BISCAYNE BAY OR UPON THE MIAMI RIVER rROX ITS NOUTS TO THE N.V. STU STREET BRIDGE, IN ORDCR TO PRESERVE THE CITY'S NATURAL SCENIC BRAUTY, TO GUARANTEE OPEN SPACES. AND TO PROTECT THE WATERFRONT 81 IMPOSING MINIMUM FRONT AND SIDE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS, SURJSCT TO WAIVER UNDER CERTAIN CONDITIONS AND FURTHER 0094ECT eY TO CERTAIN EXCEPTIONS. "DoculSLv,10 , pEX EM NO WHEREAS, the City Cosmisaion, at a regular mooting duly called and held according to law on the 20th day of July, 1979. duly' passed and adopted Rosolution no. 79-Sol; causing the drafting of a proposed Charter amendment to prohibit the loasing for comwercial use of, or making management contracts for any Clty waterfront property, except the City of pllapi/University of Miami JAMUS L. . Knight International Center end hotel facility, including all improve - manta thereon, which lreeee or contracts would prevent puhli- access to the water or which would prevent pubLie uae'of such waterfront property, or which would.not result in a fair return to the City h4vgd rocord in gadR 11 �L'+ '.!' •1 . CM CO ON Na CW JUL2 319W IA101Y110N M!}. 00-1137 L Fe '01 �18:35 No.014 P.03 Oft ssc>c on two appraisaler or which Would permit use of, such Property -not authorised under the Chen existing Macter Plan of the city of Mani, unless such leaao or contract be subject to competitive bid or competitive negotiationst said Charter amcndment.1140 pro- hibiting extension or modification of any existing such lease or management agreallont which dons not comply with each of the above requirements, unless such proposed extension or MQdikication has tirst been approved by a majority of the voters, which proposal is referred to herein as charter Amendment No. 1s and WHEREAS, the city Commission At a regular moetiug ruly called and held according to law oa the lath day of July. 1971, Auly paased and adopted Resolution NO. 79-502, causing the drPfttnq of a proposed Charter amendment to provide for occupancy llmitationa upon designated Waterfront property 4y imposinV minimum front and sidw setback requireMents subject to weivor under (:ortoin oonditioas and subject to oertain excaptions, which propobel is referred to herein to Charter Amendment Ne. 21 and WHEREAS, said proposed amondmsato snail b*CJma effective in the event that they are approved by a majority of the tysalified electors of the City of Miami voting at a spoolai. municipal election i held for the purpose of enabling said electors to register their approval or disapproval of said proposed amendments and NHEREAS, it is appropriate and necessary that the City Commission make provision for holding said ,special municipal election) NOW, TH$RSFORS, OR IT R99OLVED AY THE COMMISSION OP THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIOAt Section 1. A special municipal election is*bereby called and directed to be hold in the City of Miami, Florida, from 7s60 A.1K. until 7a00 P.M. on ruosday, the 18th day of September. 1979, for the purpose.of submitting to the qualified aleCtors of the City of Miami for their approval or disapproval a meaabre Known as Charter Anendaont No. 1 and a measure known as.Chartei Amendment No. 2. SOmitted into the public 10 recorA in connection with -x item S on AL Walter 1=oeman City Clerk _ ------ -- = - --...:.....__ ...-- - -. - __ = - -____ _,..._._..._.. _.. -- -- -......._.__•------_—..,tee 00- 1137 ,;. OL � Feb 1'01 18 3b No 014 P.04 Seetton 2. Said Opecial municipal election shall be held at the voting plaaes in the precincts designated, all as shown,on the list atteicbod hereto and made a part hereof and referred to 86 Rahlbit No. 1, or ae may be designated by the supervisor of Elections of Dade county, in ocnfvroity with the provisione-of the genoral laws of the atato. A deseriotion of the registration books and record* which pertain to election precincts wholly or partly within th4 city and which thu eity.is adapting and desire& to uao for holding ouch spacial municipal elottion to as followal All registration oards, bookd, cccor45and certificates pertaining to electors of the city and ostablishud and maintained aS official by tho supervisor of Elections ol'Dode County, ije conformity with the provLui.ona of the general lava of the state, are hereby adapted and 3c#olare:d to be, a,sel shall horuaftor be recogniaad and seoeptod an, otfici:e2 roglatratton car do, books, record:; auO cortittcates of Cho City. SActlon 3. The official ballot to be used at said speoiol municipal election shall bo in full compliance vith the lava of the State of Florida with respect to abronteso ballots and to the use of Computer aloctlon system ICES). Sgrtion 4. In compliance with Florida Ytatuto 100.3.42t the City Clark is hereby authortsed and directed to publish once a meek for 4 Consecutive weeks during the 3o day period prior to the heroin election notice of the special referendum election ss herein not forth in the following nevapapsrs, all of which are published within the City of Niami. rlovidas THE MIAMI BSKALD Tat MIAMI HBWS DIARFQ LAS AgERWAS TUB MIAMI TIMES THE LIBERTY N9115, said notice being substantially ae forth in the following forms Sa bmIlk d rote the public record In Connection with 10 itemon� Walter Foeman - City Clean r •4 Ma 00-113'7 3 E N O LL ® C C 0 U CD .� t E - v E I TG� is^.! (L : Feb 101 18:36 No.014 P.05 NOTICE OF 9PECIRL REFSRENDUM RLECTION To BE HOLD ON u TUSBDAY, SEPTEMBER la, 1970 IN THU CITY ON MIAMI, FLORIDA A special tozarendum election will bh held on Tuutiday, september 1R, 1979, for the purpose of submitting to the qualified oloctors t,f the City of-MdAll, i•lorida, the following yuebtionst "CHARTER AMENDMENT tt0. 1: unall *action 7(f) of Pita charter of thte City of Miami be Amundod by prr,hiL•itiny the lt+a�inq far commorulal ut:o of. of making o° mar.iyi.mant uentracta for, any City waterfront property, with th-• axctrptioe of (1) The City of tvidrnl/t;uivcrsity of Miami Jame, L. Xnirlit intvrnattenat Cunttr Lind hotel facility includltiq all improvomatittt thereon, (a) any projout, the financiuy of whiCit has been provided by tha authoclsatlue of bon4x to ba isnuod by tlto City of Alazi, vh!ch loases or contracts would lirovont rvationavle public acAe!►e' to tho watur or which would prevont public utvv of aueh watarfront gropocty, or which wouid rant result to a fair return to the City based on two 0tdopandunt appraixals, or which would permit. NSA+ Of ,tech prop.irty not authortac- under the. titan oxtsting a,iater Plat. of ibe City of m.i�tm/, Air which teaf;c 4C contritet w.tti ■tOt Subject to coet;,ut:itivv hid or comprtitivo neryotiariontct said 'tii.arter amendmvnc ol.ue prnhibitlnq oxtc.•nelon or modl- fieaLkoa of any existing such Lush@ or manaacaunt ayreet"rnL which dose tint comply with each of tho )above rucuirvmcnt%, vplc,*A such prol?osod oxtonsion .or modtfical:lon hart first been approved by a majority of Oo voters of tho City .of MAaftit?" "CHARTER AME`lDMUNT NO. z: Sbatl St;ttion 30) of the charter of'-thc City of ;4intnA be anotldod to provide for bulldinp lilacomont lietitatione upott land located on Eiseayno Bay, or 011011 the Alatni Rivor from its mouth to the N.V. 5th Street Bridge in order to prasarve tho City•c natural $conic beauty, to guarantct: opan spaces, end to prom twct the traterfronc by iMposieo minisum front and side votbaek rvyulremettts, subject to waiver upon certain condltinr,st and further subject to certain axeeptione7" eeetion 91 clectore daairltty to vot:3 for the approval of xaid Quostionu desuribod above Ahall be instructed to punch WtraighL down with tlty styluu through tau hole next. to the wort) "VOR" within the ballot frame containing the statement rolating to oath said Question) and, electors dtrairina to vote againitt said Questions shall be instructed to push straight down with the stylu�t Lhrougb the hole next to the word 'AGAINST" within tl}c ballot fkaata eontainipq the statement rolating to each said Question. 10 Submitted into the public -4- record in connection with item on .1 ? l t4 u Waiter Foeman 00-1137 Feb '01 ' 18:37 No.014 P,06 section 6. The City Clerk shall cause to be prepared atisentoe ballots s=ontaininq thvQuestioaa set foctlr in Sect4kas, 4 above ' 1 'for the use of absent "lectors er.r.1Lled to cart such ballnts In "aid election Scctlon 7. All qualified electors of the City shall be .A permitted to vote in said special municipal Olecclon and tow suparvis0r ?; of Elections of Dade County la hereby regaestcd, authorizod and dircctod. to furninh, at the cs+:t and vxpall=:e of th+e cm ly of MlatAl, a List of all qusslifiertj ulcctor;; i,e the Clay Of Miemi 4" ahswtl by the :. reglatr;,tion books as,d rocords Of his or has, office "nit duly .to c,rrtifY the same for delivery to and use of the olectioh offievre dAslgrsatc#d !. to f-prve at the respective potting plACi�a iu said alectioR.preeinctu. r F Neution d, RALPH G. ON(iLk, the City Clerk of this City of ►iidmi, Florida, . is ljo.,roby dvalgnAl.;;d and Appnist4 d ae the orf icial roprpuont.,tivo of t)1u city Commitlslo,, in all tranzactivna with the supurvi»or of Eloationti or uada county lit rolatiou to mar.tors pertain- ri iuq to the use of tho re.listretlan hnoke and the holding or aaltl 'apeclal municipal elcctian. ' Section 9, Th.r proper officials of tho.C-ty of Miami and > Dade County are, horoGy author.zo4 and directod to r,ubmlt scald quw*tlons -y to thu electorate at th.• xeptomber LK, 1974 special municipol election 1 and to certify the result thereof to the Comial»llon or the City of Alwai, Florida. and all acts pertaininq to said electior. heretofore p*rrormud by said officials are hereby ratified and confirmed. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 34th day cif ,Ram , 1979. _ MUrlce_A. Ferro MAURICE A. M(P S ' N A Y O It �RLPN C. D '26, CITY CLSR& Submitted into the public . recor in connect - PRE AM A11U AF,PP OV Y : Item �. n bv-th �oV� ? on ROBERT F. CLARK, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY Walter }F�oeman O CD AS TO M • AdD ORILECTNBSF, : Ci`Y Clerk GSO 6 !. >;NOX, R.. ITY ATTORNEY Q®-11317 L Fe ' 01 ' 18 : 38 No .014 R.07 g • V Y RESOLUTION N0, A RESOLUTION DECLARING AND CERTIFYING THE RESULTS Of THE SPECIAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION HELD ON SEPTEM- BER 18, 1970 FOR THE PURPOSE OF VOTING Volt THE APPROVAL OR DISAPPROVAL Of THE FOLLOWINCc (a) CHARTER AMENDMENT N0, 1 WaICU PROPOSED AN.A4I6NOMENT TO SECTION 3(f) OF THE C17Y CHARTER TO PROVIDE FOR A PROHIBITION UPON THE LEASING Of OR THE MAKING OF MANACEM"T CONTRACTS POR ANY CITY WATRRFRONT PROPERTY WITH PRIVATE FIRMS OR PERSONS, WITH THR 6XCCPTION OF (1) 711E CITY OF MIAMI /UN1V9R81TY Of MIAMI, JADIBB L, KNIGHT INTERNATIONAL CENTER AND HOTEL FACILITY, INCLUDING ALL IMPROVENENTH THEREON, (8) ANY PROJECT, THE FINANCING OF W111CH HAS BEEN PROVIDED BY THR AUTHORIZATION OF BLINDS TO BE ISSUED BY THE CITY OF MIAMI, WHICH LEASE$ AND CONTRACTS WOULD PREVENT REASONABLE PUBLIC ACCESS TO THE WATER OR WHICH WOULD PREVENT PUBLIC USE OF SUCH WATRRFRONT PROPERTY, OR WHICH WOULD NOT RESULT IN A FAIR RETURN TO THE CITY BASED ON TWO INDEPENDENT APPRAISALS. OR WHICH WOULD PERMIT USE OF SUCH PROPERTY NOT AUTHORIZED L'XDE1t THE THEN EXISTING MASTER PLAN OF THE CITY Of, NIANI, OR WHICH LEASE OK CONTRACT WAS NOT SUBJECT TO COMPETITIVE BID OR COMPETITIVE NECOYEATIONS; SAID PROPOSED CHARTER AMENDMENT ALSO PROHIBITING EXTENSION OR MODIFICATION OF ANY SXIST194 RUCH LEASE OR HANAORHENT AGREENKST WHICH DID NOT COMPLY WITH F.ACH OF THE ABOVE REQUIRRHENTS, UNLESS SUCH PROPOSED EXTENSION OR MODIFICATION SHALL FIRST HAVE BEEN APPROVED DY A MAJORITY OF THE VOTBR3 OP THE CITY OF MIAIfI; AND (4) CHARTER ANBNDNENT NO. I WHICN PROPOSED AN AMENDMENT TO SECTION 3(4) OF THE CITY CWIRTER TO PROVIDE P09 BUILDING PLACEMENT LIMITATIONS UPON PROPERTY LOCATED ON BISCAYNE DAY OR UPON THE MIAMI RIVER PROM ITS MOUTH TO THE N.W. 9TH STREET DRIDCE, IN ORDER TO PREBERV6 THE CITY'S NATURAL SCENIC BEAUTY, TO CUARANTL'E OPEN SPACES, AND TO PROTECT THE MATERFR09T BY IMPOSING MINIMUM FRONT AND SIDE SETBACK R6QU1REM99ZS, SUBJECT TO UAIVSR UPON CERTAIN CONDITIONS AND FURTHER SUBSCY TO CERTAIM EXCEPTION&; SAID ELECTION RESULTING IP APPROVAL OF EACH OF Tilt SAID PROPOSED CHARTER AMENDMENTS. "'DOCUMENT /INDEX r ` pI0. 'v n WHEREAS, a special municipal election was duly hold in the City of Miami, Florida on September 18, 1079; and* WHEREAS, said election was duly conducted In accord - once with the provisloas of the "Electronic Voting Systems Act" (F.S. 101.5601 through 101.5615); and WHEREAS, the official returne of each of 87 election precincts In the herein election of September 18, 1979 have Submitted into the public recur n connection b'Jdtl1 item on Walter Foeman city Clerk Cliff cowmssm MEETM OF SEPZ0191� l_ FebAW 01 18 38 No .014 P . 08 !".�lfr./rT r} •.r 79-6.32 RESOLUTION NO -- A RESOLUTION DECLARING ANU CERTIFYING THR RESULTS OF THE SPECIAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION HELD ON SEPTEH- SEE la. 1979 FOR THE PURPOSE OF VOTING FOR THE APPROVAL OR DISAPPROVAL. OF THE FOTA OWING; (a) CHARTER AMENDMENT NO, 1 WHICH PROrDSED AN AMENDMENT TO SECTION 3(f) OF THE CITY CHARTER TO PROVIDE FOR A PROHIBITION UPON THE LHASING OF OR TNK MAKING OF MANAGEDIL'NT CONTRACTS FOR ANY .CITY WATRRFRONI PROPERTY W1TH'PRIVATE FIRMS OR PERSONS, WITH THE EXCCrTION OF (1) THE CITY OF MIAMI/UNIVERSITY OF 11LANI, JAMES L, � KNIGHT INTERNATIONAL CENTER AND HOTEL FACILITY. INCLUDING ALL INPROVENENTB THEREON, (2) ANY PROJECT, THE F.INANCINC OF WHICH HAS BEEN PROVIDED BY TUB AUTHORIZATION OF BONDS TO BE ISSUED BY TUB CITY OF MIAMI, WHICH LEASES AND CONTRACTS WOULD PREVENT REASONABLE PUBLIC ACCESS TO THE WATER OR WHICIL WOULD PREVENT PUBLIC USE Or SUCH WATERFRONT PROPERTY, OR WHICH WOULD NOT RESULT IN A FAIR RETURN TO THE CITY BASED ON TWO INDEPENDENT APPRAISALS, OR WHICH WOULD PERMIT USE OF SUCH PROPERTY NOT AUTUORIZED 1 UNDER THE THEN ZXLSTINC MASTER PLAN. OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, OR WHICH LEASH OR CONTRACT WAS NOT SUBJECT TO COMPETITIVE BID OR COMPETITIVE NEGOTIATIONS: SAID PROPOSED CHARTER AMENDMENT ALSO PROHIBITING EXTENSION OR MODIFICATION of ANY EX15TING SUCH LEASE i OR MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT WHICH DID NOT COMPLY WITH 1 EACH OF THE ABOVE REQUIREMENTS, UNLESS SUCH PROPOSED tXTENRION OR MODIFICATION SHALL FIRST HAVE BEEN APPROVED BY A MAJORITY OF TH.E VOTERS OF THE CITY OF MIA= ; AND (b) CHARTER AMENDMENT No. 2 WHICH PROPOSED AN AMENDMENT TO SECTION 3(4) OF THE CITY CHARTER TO PROVIDE FOR BUILDING PLACEHtHT LIMITATIONS UPON PROPERTY LOCATED ON BISCAYNE BAY OR UPON THE 11IANI ; RIVER FROM ITS xmg TO THE N.W. STU STRgET BRIDGE, 7 IN ORDER TO PRESERVE THE CITY'$ NATURAL SCENIC BEAUTY, TO GUARANTEE OPEN SPACES, AND TO PROTECT THE WATERFRONT BY IMPOSING MINIMUM FRONT AND SIDE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS. SUBJECT TO WAIVER UPON CERTAIN CONDITIONS AND FURTHER BURECT TO CERTAIN EXCEPTIONS; I SAID ELECTION RESULTING IN APPROVAL OF EACH OF TgE SAID PROPOSED CHARTER AMENDMENTS. "DOCUMENT INDEX 1. WHEREAS, a spacial municipal election was duly hold in tbo City of Mi*ui, Florida on September 18, 1979; and WHEREAS, *aid election was duly conducted In accord- ance wttb the provisions of tba "Elactronic Voting Systems Act" (F.S. 101.5601 through 101.5615); and WHEREAS, the official rcturne of eaehOf 87 election precincts in tt)e herein election Of Septembar 18, 1979 have Submitted into. the public pfry 1rpwassm ,record in connection with METiN " item onBEF200M Walter Foeman MOON* City Cleric 00-1137 - -� Feb 001 ' 18:39 No.014 P.09 79-632, RESOLUTION NO.. A RESOLUTION DECLARINC AND CERTIFYING THE RESULTS OF THE SPECIAL MUNICIPAL. RLECTTON H21.D ON SEPTBM— BER 18, 1979 FOR THE PURPOSE OF VOTING FOR THE APPROVAL OR DISAFFROVAL OF THE FOLLOWINCS (s) CHARTER AMENDMENT NU. 1 WHICH PROPOSED AN A14ENDNEUT TO SECTION 7(f) OF THE CITY CHARTER TO PROVIDE FOR A PROHIBITION UPON THE LEASING OF OR THE MAKING UY MANAGEMENT CONTRACTS FOR ANY CITY WATERFRONT VROPKRTY WITH PRIVATE FIRMS OR PERSONS, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF (1) TIRE CITY OF MIAMI /UPIVlR8ITY OF MIAMI. JANES L. KNIGHT INTERNATIONAL CENTER AND HOTEL FACILITY, INCLUDING ALL.01PROVEMBNTS THEREON, (2) ANY PROJECT. THE FINANCING OF WHICH HAS y6ER PROVIDED BY THE AUTHORIZATION OF BONDS TO BE ISSUED BY TLIC CITY OF MIAMI, WHICH LEASES AND CONTRACTS WOULD PREVENT REASONABLE PUBLIC ACCESS TO THE WATER OR WHICH WOVLO PREVENT PUBLIC USE Or SUCH WATERFRONT PROPERTY. OR WHICH WOULD NOt RESULT IN A FAIR RRTUKN TO THE CITY BASED ON TWO INDEPENDENT APPRAISALS. OR WHICH WOPLU PERMIT USE OF SUCH PROPERTY NOT AUTHOR12EU l•\OF.K TILE THEN EXISTING MASTER PLAN OF THE CITY OF NIAN1, OR WHICH LEASR OR CONTRACT WAS NOT SUBJECT TO COMPETITIVE BID OR CO?IPETITIVE NEGOTIATIONS= SAID PROPOSED CHARTER AMENDMENT ALSO PROHIBITING EXTENSION oK MODIFICATION OF ANY 9XIST100 SUCH LBASE 01% MANAGEMENT ACRIEMENT WHICH DID NOT COMPLY WITH EACH OF THE ABOVE REQUIREMENTS, UNLESS SUCH PROPOSED EXTENSION OR MODIFICATION SMALL FIRST HAVE BEEN , APPROVED BY A MAJORITY OF THE VOTERS Of THE CITY OF MIAMI,; AND (b) CHARTER AMENDMENT 30. 2 WHICH PROPOSED AN AMENDMENT TO SECTION 9(4) OP THE CITY CHART BR To PROVIDE FOR BUILDING PLACEMENT LIMITATIONS UPON PROPERTY LOCATED ON BISCAVNB BAY DR UPON TITS MIAMI RIVER FROM ITS MOUTH To THE M.U. STH STREET BRIDGE, IN ORDER TO PRESHRVB THE CITY'S NATURAL SCENIC BEAUTY. TO GUARANTEE OPEM SPACES, AND TO 011ROTEC'1 TNR WATERFRONT BY IMPOSING MINIMUM FRONT AX0 SIDE SBTRACK REQUIREMENTS. SUBJECT TO WAIVES UPON CERTAIN CONDITIONS AND FURTHER SUBBCT TO CERTATO EXCEPTIONS; SAID ELECTION RESULTING IN APPROVAL OF EACH OF THE SAID PROPOSED CHARTER AMSKDMENTS. "DOCUMENT INDEX IT A �;0. '' •� WHEREAS, a apacial municipal election Ens duly held in tho City of Miaai. florid* on Septe*bvt 18, 1079; and WHEkEAS, said election was duly conducted In accord— ance with the provialona of cite "Blectronic Voting Systase Act" (F.S. 101.5601 throu&h 101.5615); and WHEREAS, the official returns Ofesrh of 87 election Precincts in the herein ulcct.ion of Septonbar 18, 1979 tieve Submitted into the public record in connection vvi.th, PL�r o" viern Walter t=oeman City Clerk, C" cwwssm MEMS OF SEP20 ria- Qa-113'7 --" • CONCLUSIONS This project has many positive values and overall receives a 1 1/s points, meaning it is in the positive side of the scale as how it affects its surroundings. However, it also has a number of negative factors we feel can be improved and should be addressed before approval is granted. RECOMENDATIONS 1) This, and all future projects, should be analyzed within a Master Plan that shows its place in the present and future of this community. 2) The committee strongly supports new residential to be built North of the River in the central core as an important element of Mixed Use development. It should be built. 3) The committee feels this project fails to properly consider the significance of the Pedestrian and the public in its none -vehicle flow in and around the buildings. 4) The committee feels and opportunity is forever lost in the way it handles the possible dynamic interaction with the River, it could demonstrate a better adaptation to its unique location. 5) Insufficient public safety as identified by CPTED standards and site layout. re 10 rcl ici arn PZ•5 on r —_ %4-oo City GL*a'� 00--1137 0 . 0 URBAN DESIGN COMMITTEE DOWNTOWN MIANH PRIORITIES. Over 200 civic volunteers of all professions have taken part in formulating this `Priority' listing as a formula for evaluating proposed projects for downtown Miami. `Miami One' was evaluated during two committee meeting called specifically for that purpose. The results are as follows: +5 = excellent rating. 0 = neutral. -5 = negative impact. TOTAL RANGE PRIORITY 1) 1 1 Miamiam 2) 0 0 to 1 Historic 3) 0 -3 to 3 Pedestrian Oriented 4) -2 -4 to 2 Interaction 5) 3 -4 to 4 Density, mixed Use 6) 2 1 to 3 Scale 7) 3 2 to 4 Color 8) 0 0 to 1 Signage 9) 1 % -5 to 4 Open spaces within Private development 10) 2 V2 1 to 3 Art 11) 2 % 2 to 4 Lighting 12) -3 -5 to 0 50 ft. waterfront easement 13) -3 -4 to 0 CPTED 14) 2 % -2 to 3 District Boundaries 15) 1 -2 to 2 Enhancement with Details 16) 1 V2 _-3 to 3_ Roof line. a z—s-dv B�geR °�y:f,,•/(' f ,T-87-1109 • 87 Incrt 1 • 0 RESOLUTION NO. 97--1149 A RESOLUTION CONCERNING THE DOWNTOWN MIAMI DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT, ENCOMPASSING AN AREA OF THE CITY OF MIAMI UNDER THE JURISDICTION OF THE MIAMI DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST AREA AS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN, PURSUANT TO AN APPLICATION FOR OEYELOPMENT- APPROVAL PROPOSED BY THE MIAMI DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY; AIITHORIIING AN INCREMENT I DEVELOPMENT ORDER; APPROVING SAID DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT AFTER CONSIDERING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE SOUTH FLORIDA REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL AND THE CITY OF MIAMI PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD, SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS OF THE INCREMENT I DEVELOPMENT ORDER ATTACHED HERETO AS EXHIBIT -A-. THE APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL INCORPORATED HEREIN BY REFERENCE, AND THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE SOUTH FLORIDA REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL INCORPORATED HEREIN BY REFERENCE; MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW; PROVIDING THAT THE INCREMENT I DEYELOPMENT'OROER SHALL BE BINDING ON THE APPLICANT AND SUCCESSORS IN INTEREST; DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO SEND COPIES OF THIS RESOLUTION AND THE INCREMENT I DEVELOPMENT ORDER TO AFFECTED AGENCIES AND THE APPLICANT; DIRECTING THE CITY MANAGER TO TAKE ALL ACTIONS NECESSARY TO FULFILL THE CITY'S OBLIGATIONS UNDER THE INCREMENT I DEVELOPMENT ORDER; AND PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE. WHEREAS, on November 26, 1986, the Downtown Development Authority o•f the. City of'Miami submitted a complete Application for Development Approval for a Development of Regional Impact to the South Florida Regional Planning Council, the Florida Department of Comminity Affairs, and the City of Miami pursuant to F.S. 380.05 (1987), for the ongoing development through the year 2007 of a portion of the area within the ODA jurisdiction, as legally described in the Development Order attached hereto; and . WHEREAS, the Miami Planning Advisory Board, at its meeting held on December 9, 1987, following an advertised public hearing, adopted Resolution No. 75-87 by 6 to 2 vote, "-c--spending _approval of th Increment I Development Order for Downtown Miami as attached hereto; and WHEREAS, on December 10, 1987, the City Commission conducted a'public hearing pursuant to F.S. 380.06 (1987); and WHEREAS, the City Commission considered the Application for Development i Approval, the report and recommendations of the South Florida Regional ATTACHMENTS CITY COMMIS IS ON MZE71NG OF 1 DEC 10 1987 q. }s.•�. ,5 yM, eL� 9R1 9'64�xE;. 3: to via t�,it,s'.: record in cone aon R,!: km on FTc<IDrl" r C4 er�� K S: 00-1137 Planning Council, and each element required to be considered by F.S. 380.06 • (1987); and WHEREAS, the City Commission determined that all requirements of notice and other legal requirements for the issuance of the proposed Increment I Development Order had been complied with; and. WHEREAS, the City Commission deems it advisable and in the best interest of the general welfare of the City of Miami to issue a Increment I Development Order as hereinafter set forth; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLYED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. The Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law are made with respect to the Project as described in the Increment I Development Order for Downtown Miami, which is attached hereto as Exhibit "Am' and made a part hereof by reference, and fs applicable to an area encompassing that area within the City of Miami under the, jurisdiction of the Downtown Development Authority, with the exception of the Southeast Overtown/Park West Redevelopment District, • as more particularly described in Exhibit "A". Section 2. The Increment I Development Order for Downtown Miami, (Exhibit "A"), is hereby granted and issued. 0 Section 3. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to immediately send certified copies of this Resolution together with Exhibit "A' and copies of all exhibits, attachments, aid written materials, including portions of ordinances referenced in the text of the Increment I Development Order to: The Florida Department of Community Affairs, 2571 Executive Center Circle East, Tallahassee, Florida, 32301; The South Florida Regional Planning Council, 3440 Hollywood Boulevard, Suite 140; Hollywood, Florida, 33021; and the Downtown Development Authority, Suite 1800, One Biscayne Tower, Miami, Florida 33132. Section 4. The City Manager is hereby directed to take all f actions necessary to fulfill the City's obligations under the terms of the Increment I Development Order for Downtown Miami (Exhibit "A"). M Submitted into the public recur in connection with item on Walter Foeman City Clerk 0� 137 Is Section 5. In the event that any portion or section of this Resolution or the/ Increment I Development Order for Downtown Miami (Exhibit "A") is • determined to.be invalid, illegal, or unconstitutional by a court or agency of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall in no manner affect the remaining portions of this Resolution or the Increment I Development Order for Downtown -Miami (Exhibit "A"), which shall remain in full force and effect. PASSED AND ADOPTED this loth day of December 1987. XAYIER L. SUAREZ# MAYOR ATTEST: (011 �CIT TTY HIRAI, Y. CLERK - I PREPARED AND APPROVED BY: 4 0EL E. MAXWELL �,dSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY APPROVED AS EjORM AND CORRECTNESS: LUCIA A. DOUGHERT CITY ATTORNEY Submitted into the Public recur'in connection with item J, on Walter Foeman City Clerk 3 da-37 'A ' INCREMENT I DEVELOPMENT ORDER -AAME OF DEVELOPMENT: Downtown Miami NAME OF DEYELOPER: Downtown Development Authority of the City of Miami AUTHORIZED AGENT OF OEYELOPER: Roy F. Kenzie; Executive Director, Downtown Development Authority and Sergio Rodriguez, Director, City of Miami Planning Department, or their successors. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The Project consists 'of development in Downtown Miami through the Year 2007, including the following land uses and increments: Land Uses Increment I Increment II Increment III Totals Office (gross square feet) 7,100,000 3,600,000 3,700,000 14,400,000 Government Office (gross square feet) 300,000 250,000 200,000 750,000 Retail/Service ' (gross square feet) 1,050,000 400,000 500,000 �1,950,000 • Hotel (rooms) 1,000 500 1,100 2,600 Residential (dwelling units) 3,550 21550 2,920 9.,020 Convention (gross square feet) 500,000 0 0 500,000 Wholesale/Industrial (gross square feet) 1.050,000 0 1,050,000 2,100,000 Institutional (gross square feet) 300,000 0 300,000 600,000 Attractions/Recreation (seats) 3,400 1,600 5,000 10,000 Pursuant to F.S. 380.06(22) (1987), the Project specifies the total amount of development planned for each land use category, but provides flexibility for such development to be located anywhere within the Project Area, subject to local land development regulations. The Project Area includes all nroperty wi'hin the boundaries or the Downtown Development Authority, with. the exception of that area between HE/NW 5th Street and I-395 known as ,"Park West", as illustrated on the map in Exhibit 1 and described in Exhibit 2 atta-hed hereto. The Project Area contains a total of approximately 839 acres of land, including approximately 78 acres currently zoned and developed as i City parks. Submitted into the public recoriJ In connect*on with -item on /_Ll & / Walter Foeman City Clerk At,; LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: See Exhibit 2. • EFINITIDNS: For the purposes of this Development Order, the following terms D P P shall' be defined as follows: ADA or Application for Oevelooment Approval: The original Application for Development Approval for Downtown Miami filed by the DDA on November 25; 1986, pursuant to F.S. 380.06 (1987). CADA or Consolidated Application for Develooment Approval*: The revised ADA prepared pursuant to paragraph 16 on page 13 ^ herein. Certificate of Occupancy: A permanent dr temporary and/or partial Certificate of Occupancy issued, pursuant to Section 307 of the South Florida Building Code, for any "Net New Development" as defined herein. City: The City bf Miami, Florida. Council: The South Florida Regional Planning Council. • DDA or Downtown Development Authority: The Downtown Development Authority of the City of Miami, Florida. • DERM: The Metropolitan Dade County Department of Environmental Resources Management. DRI: Development of Regional Impact. Development Credits: The individual units if land uses included within Total Allowable Development, as measured by square footage or number of dwelling units, hotel rooms, or seats.,, FDER: The Florida Department of Environmental Regulation. Major Use Special Permit: A special permit issued by the City Commission Pursuant to Ordinance 9500, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, as SUbMitted- into the Public amended. recor in connection with item - on JAR/Jl�kUa Walter Foeman K...-� CRY Cie* 2 `1 �by13 ! Net New Develooment: Any construction or reconstruction which will result in a net, increase, within any 'Parcel of Land", of residential dwelling units. hotel' rooms, seats in attractions/recreation facilities or gross square footaoe for office, government office, retail/service, convention, wholesale/industrial or institutional uses. Land uses to 'be. removed by — demolition of a building or structure may be credited against the proposed new land uses for purposes of calculating the net increase, if the Planning Director determines that there was a valid Certificate of Occupancy existing on the effective date of this Development order for the land uses to be demolished. If a change of land use is proposed, the Planning Director may credit the prior land use against the proposed land use based upon equivalent impacts as measured by peak hour vehicle trip generation. Any activity which has on,the effective date of this Development Order a valid building permit or any currently effective development order shall not- be included as Net New Development.-The.Planning Director may exclude from Net New Development any small development under 10,000 square feet in.floor area, if he finds that such development would have no regional impact as measured by peak hour vehicle trips. ' Parcel of.Land: Any quantity of land capable of being described with such definiteness that its location and boundaries may be established, and which is designated by its owner or developer as land to be used or developed as a unit or which has been used or developed as a unit. Project: That Project described in the "PROJECT DESCRIPTION", on Page 1 herein. Project Area: The area included within the legal description in Exhibit 2. Total Allowable Development: The quantity of Net New Development for which Certificates of Occupancy may be issued under the terms and conditions of this Development Order., together with the applicable Master Development Order, as may be modified pursuant to F.S. 380.06(19) (1987), and which shall be measured b the f 11 J o owing land uses. 0 b . Office Government Office 7,100,000 gross square feet 300,000 gross square feet 6 U M Hed into the puntic record In connection with Item on 4-a dU Walter Foeman X City Cleric 3 0 0"1131 a • Retail/Service ® Hotel Residential Convention' Wholesale/Industrial Institutional Attractions/Recreation 1,050,000 gross square feet 1,000 rooms 3,550 dwelling units 500,000 gross square feet 1,050,000 gross square feet 300•,000 gross square feet - 3,400 seats The City may permit simultaneous increases and decreases in the above described land use categories, provided that the regional impacts of the land uses as changed will not exceed the adverse regional impacts of the land uses in Increment I of the Project as originally approved, as measured by total Peak hour vehicle trips. FINDINGS OF FACT: The following findings of fact are hereby confirmed and adopted with respect to the Project: • A. The findings and determinations of fact set forth in the recitals of the resolution to this Development Order are hereby confirmed. B. The real property which is the subject of this Development Order is legally described in Exhibit 2. C. The DDA filed the ADA with the City, the Council, and the Florida Department of Community Affairs. D. The CAOA has been filed by the ODA pursuant to F.S. 380.06(22) (1987) authorizing a downtown development authority to apply for development approval and receive a development' order for any or all of the area within its jurisdiction. Individual developments are not identified or required to be identified in the CADA. E. The purpose of the CADA is to identify and assess probable regional impacts and to obtain approval for Total Allowable Development in accordance with the general guidelines set forth in this Development Order and the CADA. The concept is to recognize the Project Area as a single area of 'high intensity development and to focus the ORI review Process primarily on the impacts that Total Allowable Development within 4 Submitted into the public recorgjn connection with item on -J—a-A A/ Walter Foem�n City Clerk. 1 L • F. G. H. I the area will have on land;. water, transportation; environmental; community services, energy and other resources and systems.;of regional significance. The CADA seeks a single DRI review process for overall phased development of the downtown area rather than requiring each individual DRI scale development within the downtown area to file for separate DRI reviews. Development within the Project Area is expected to. continue to be accomplished over an extended period of time by a variety of developers, which may include the City. These developers may respond to market demand and technologies that can only be estimated in the CADA. The CADA is intended to serve as a flexible guide to planned development of the. Project Area rather than a precise blueprint for its development. Therefore, pursuant to F.S. 380.06(21)(b) (1987), the CADA seeks master development approval for three increments of development over a period of approximately twenty years and specific development approval for Increment I; which is the first phase of development projected for a period of approximately five years. Subsequent incremental applications may need to be adjusted tq more nearly serve as a Ii:vin3 guide recognizing the evolution of market demand and technologies. The Project Area contains a total of approximately 839 acres, including approximately 18 acres presently zoned and developed as City parks. The CADA proposes Net New Development within the Project Area for the land uses, quantities and phases defined herein as Total Allowable Development. The Project is not located in an area of critical state concern as designated pursuant to F.S. 380 (1987). A comprehensive review of the probable impacts that will be generated by Increment I of the Project has been conducted by various City departments. as reflected in the CADA and the South Florida Re ional 9 into the public Planning Council staff. Submitted recor in cC4nnection vVit<h J. This Development Order is consistent with the report and recommendations item on j P-q-ka— of the South Florida Regional Planning Council, entitled "Development of Walter Foeman City Cleric Regional- Impact Assessment for Downtown Miami - Increment I", dated' i October 5, 1987. The South Florida Regional Planning Council recommends 5 00-113'7 • C, approval of Increment I of the Project; and all conditions to which such ,approval is subject are reflected 'herein. K. Increment I of the Project is consistent with the applicable portion of the State land development plan and the Regional Plan for South Florida. L. Increment I of the Project is in conformity with the adopted Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plana M. Increment I of the Project is in accord with the district zoning classifications of Zoning Ordinance 9500, as amended. N. Increment I of the Project, will have a favorable impact on the economy of the City. P. Increment I of the Project will efficiently use public transportation facilities. ` Q. Increment I of the Project will favorably affect the need for people to find adequate housing reasonably accessible to their places of employment. R. Increment I of the Project will .efficiently use necessary public facilities. S. Increment I of the Project will include adequate mitigative' measures to assure- that it will not adversely effect the environment and natural resources of the City. T. Increment I of the Project will not adversely affect living conditions in the City. U. Increment I of the Project will not adversely affect public safety. V. There is a public need for Increment I of the Project. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW: That, having made the findings of fact zontained above, the City Commission hereby concludes as�a matter of law, the following: U bliC Submitted into the p p y "ecord in GOnnecti Vith A. The DDA constitutes a "downtown development authority"__as defined tin !�� � pte. t-r�—�-- F.S. 380 (1987). and is authorized by F.S. 380 (1987) to make Walter Foeman. ' City Cleik , application for development approval and receive a development order. B. Increment I of the Project complies with the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan, is consistent with the orderly development and goals of the City of Miami, and .complies with local land development regulations. 6 0*4137 • • C. Increment I of the Project does not unreasonably interfere with the achievement of the objectives of the adopted State land development plan • applicable to the City of Miami and the Regional Plan for South Florida. D. Increment I of the Project is consistent with . the report and recommendations of the South Florida Regional Planning Council and does not unreasonably interfere with any of the considerations and objectives set forth in F.S. 380 (1987). E. Changes in Increment I of the Project which do not exceed the Total Allowable Development or which do not result in a net reduction of more than 5 percent in total acreage zoned and developed as City parks, shall not constitute a substantial deviation under F.S. 380 (1987). ACTION TAKEN: That, having made the findings of fact and reached the conclusions of law set forth above, it is ordered that Increment I of the Project is hereby approved, subject to the following conditions: THE CITY, ITS SUCCESSORS, AND/OR ASSIGNS JOINTLY OR SEVERALLY MAY ISSUE • BUILDING PERMITS AND CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY FOR TOTAL ALLOWABLE DEVELOPMENT, PURSUANT TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THIS DEYELOPMENY, ORDER TOGETHER WITH THE ATTENDANT MASTER DEVELOPMENT ORDER AND SHALL: 1. Require all development pursuant to this Development Order to be it accordance with applicable building codes, land development regulations, ordinances and other laws. 2. For the purpose of base=line data collection, conduct air quality monitoring for carbon monoxide (CO) concentrations based on the following requirements: f. Submitted into the public a. CO monitoring data shall be provided for each of the three (3) record in connection with sub -areas as described in the CADA: Brickel l , the ,'Central .11 on `--diml i item )9--- Business. District and Omni. Walter Foeman. City Clerk b. The monitoring shall consist of four (4) weeks of data collection r during the winter months, November 15th through March 15th, for • each sub -area. 7 00,-14 3 7 �c. The monitoring for each sub -area shall be completed prior to the • issuance of any certificate of occupancy within that sub -area for the first development under this Development Order which meets 100 percent of the presumptive threshold for Oevelopments of Regional Impact pursuant to Rule 27F, F.A.C., within that sub -area; or prior to March 15, 1991. whichever comes first." d. The monitor will be located at the presumed worst case intersection for the Brickell and Omni sub -areas. The location will* be selected jointly by the City, Florida Department of Environmental Regulation (FDER), Dade County Environmental Resources Management (DERM), sand Council staff. It has been agreed by these agencies that the existing monitor located in the Central Business District will be acceptable for that sub -area. e. Perform the monitoring required by 2a. and 2b. above as prescribed by the policies and regulations -governing GERM and submit final air quality monitoring, reports to FDER, DERM, and the Council • staff within 60 days of the completion of the monitoring. 3. Conduct air quality modeling of carbcn monoxide impacts to dett mine what, if any, changes are needed in air quality monitoring, including the need to continue monitoring. The modeling shall be completed within one year after the base -line data monitoring has been completed pursuant to paragraph 2 above and the intersections have been selected pursuant to 3a. below. The air quality modeling shall follow FDER guidelines and shall: a. Be limited to no more than ten (10) intersections to be selected Submitted into the public .. from among the intersections projected in the CADA to operate at r£cord in Connection with item on on _422�141dw_ level of service E or F. The intersections shall be selected Walter Foeman jointly by FDER, DERM, the Council staff, and the City. ! City Clerk b. Be submitted in a detailed and comprehensive air quality analysis to FDER and DERM for comment and review, and to the Council staff and the City for review and apprcval. 8 00-113'7. • C. Include proposed changes to air quality monitoring as,justified by the air quality modeling analysis. 4. If the result's of the -air quality modeling study, as described in paragraph 3 above, are more than 85 percent but less than I00 percent of the State standards for CO' concentrations, implement an air quality monitoring and abatement program following approval of the report pursuant to 3b above. The monitoring and abatement program, including a time frame for implementation, must be approved by the Council staff and the City subsequent to review and comment by FDER and PERM. The program may include. but is not limited to'. the following techniques: a. Transportation Control Measures (TCM). b. Physical planning measures (e.g. signalization, parking area locations., addition of turn lanes, etc.). C. The continuance of monitoring for 'specified sub -areas. 5. If the results of the air quality modeling study, as described in Condition 3 above, exceed State standards for CO concentrations, do one of the following: a. Provide acceptable documentation which clearly indicates that CO exceedences will not occur, or that the Net New Development seeking approval will not contribute to the predicted CO violation, or -that any potential CO additions for each Net New Development have been or will be mitigated (according to Council staff and the City subsequent to review and comment by FDER and$ubmitted into the public DERM) prior to issuance of building permits for the particular NetreCOrd In connection with item on .4al/-111—e New Development. Suc i documentation may include a modeling study Walter Foeman which incorporates measures such as those contained in Condition City Cleric 4a., b., and c., above. This documentation must be approved by the Council staff and t.:e City subsequent to review and comment by FDER and 9ERM. 9 00-1137 b. Withhold the issuance of any building permits for Net New Development within the sub -area that shows CO'exceedences. 6. Rased, upon the transportation impacts generated by Total Allowable Development for Increment I, pay or contract to pay $7;543;419 (fair share in 1987 dollars). to be expended on any or all of the following transportation improvements: a. SW 2nd Avenue bridge and approaches or the Brickell Avenue bridge and approaches, b. intersection improvements to the entrance and exit ramps to I-395 at NE 1st Avenue and NE 2nd Avenue, C. other transportation improvements if mutually agreed upon by -the City and Council staff; subsequent to review and comment by Dade County and the Florida Department of Transportation. The City shall pay or -contract to pay the fair share within 60 days following notice -that the subject improvement has been let to contract for construction. In the .event the City contracts to pay the fair share;.such contract shall in no way affect the construction schedule of the subject transportation improvement. If the improvements above have not been let to contract for construction before the earlier date of a. or b. specified below: a. four years after the effective date of the Development Order, or b. the date of issuance of Certificates of Occupancy for more than 80 percent of the Total Allowable Development, then Council. staff' the City; Dade County, and the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) will jointly decide the reallocation of 57,543,419 (fair share in 1987 dallars) within 90 days of the earlier date of Submitted into the public either . a. or b. specified above. - fecor1� in connection with -item � on�csr C 7. Withhold, the issuance of building permits for Net New Development if the Walter Foeman City has been determined to be in noncompliance with paragraph 6 above. City Cleric B. Make efforts to work closely with applicable governmental agencies to ensure that the Metromover Stage II herein be completed as identified in the current Metropolitan Planning Organization's Transportation r 10 00-1137 Improvement Program (TIP) published in June; 1987. In the event that by December 31; 1992, the Hetromover Stage II improvements are not substantially under construction, as determined by Council staff, then this situation, will be considered a substantial deviation from the mitigative efforts anticipated to offset the adverse impacts of Total Allowable Development. In this event, the Applicant shall be required to undergo additional Development of .Regional Impact review for transportation impacts pursuant to F.S. 380.06(19)(a)(9) and- (h), (1986). Such additional Development of Regional Impact review, if required, shall be initiated by March 31; 1993. Net New Developments which have obtained building permits prior to December, 31, 1992 shall not be affected by any subsequent review. 9. Within 6 months of the effective date of this Development Order; prepare and recommend to the Miami City Commission zf Transportation Control Measure (TCM) Ordinance, which shall require Net New Development to do the following: a. actively encourage and promote car and van pooling by establishing • or participating in a car pool information program, and b. provide mass transit route and schedule information in convenient locations throughout the individual development, and C. encourage mass transit use by the provision of bus shelters, bus turnout lanes; or other amenities to increase transit ridership. In addition; the TCM Ordinance shall include other appropriate transportation control measures to -be selected from but not be limited SubmVtted info the }public to the list entitled "Table 4.9 - Potential Transportation ControleTojIJ�I1I1e1;$i0i9 with Measures (TCH's) for Downtown Miami" on page 442(R) of the CADA. Th�em �� -�2 l�t�� Walter Foeman TCM ordinance must be zpproved by Council with input from the Florida City Clerk Department of Community Affairs and the. Florida Department of Transportation. 10. 1n the event that a Transportation Control Measures (TCM) Ordinance i substantially in accord with paragraph 9 above is not adopted by the 11 00-1137. lr u Miami City Commission within 18 months of the effective date of this ,Development Order, determine that this situation constitutes a substantial deviation from the mitigative efforts anticipated to offset the'adverse -impacts of Total Allowable Development. In this event, the Applicant shall be required to undergo additional .,Development of Regional Impact review pursuant to F.S. 380.06(19)(a)(g) and.(h) (1986)., Such additional Development of Regional Impact review; if required, shall be initiated by the Applicant within 90 days of the. identification of its need. 11. Have the authority to assess development for its proportionate share of the costs of improvements and/or services necessary to monitor and/or mitigate any adverse impacts. The' City shall also have authority to assess development its proportionate share of the costs attributable to preparation of the ,master plan, the Applidation for Development Approval, and this Development Order, as well as the future costs of reviewing individual development applicati.ons, monitoring compliance with this Development Order, and any other costs reasonably related to the administration and implementation of this Development Order, 'If necessary, the City shall establish a procedure for rebating any funds collected in excess of those funds attributable to a particular development and necessary to imolement this Development Order or any ordinance or procedure required to monitor and enforce compliance with this Development Order and to mitigate the impacts of Total Allowable Development.' 12. Establish December 31, 1992 as the date until which the City agrees twat ubiic the grantees of building permits or Major Use Special Permits for raewbnlitted into the pon With TQCd innnecti�o development; under the Downtown Miami - Increment I Development Tof�� on Item man Regional Impact shall not be subject to down -zoning, unit density Walter Foe le reduction, or intensity reduction to the extent of the amoilnt of development included within the building permit or Major Use Special Permit, unless the City can demonstrate that substantial changes in the conditions underlying the approval of the development order have i occurred, or that the development order was based on substantially 12 0 " 3 7 • s Applicant; or that the change is clearly essential to the public health; ,safety or welfare. MONITORING,,REPORTIil6, AND EHFORCEMENT: 13. The City shall monitor the capacity of Total Allowable. Development by reserving the amount of Development Credits necessary for Net New. Development at a time, to be determined by the Cfty, prior to or coincident with approval of a building permit or Major Use Special permit. The City shall place reasonable time limits on all building permits and Major Use .Special Permits' to assure that construction progresses within a reasonable period of time after approval to prevent stockpiling of reservations for Development Credits. The time period established by the City shall take into account the size of the proposed Net New Development in relationship to the time necessary to begin construction. 14. Upon the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for any Net New Development, the City shall make appropriate subtractions from the amount of Total Allowable Development under this Development Order. No Certificates of Occupancy shall be issued for Net New Development which would, in the aggregate, exceed the amount of Total Allowable Development under this Development Order. 15. The City shall integrate all original and supplemental ADA information into a Consolidated Application for Development Approval (CADA) and submit two copies of the CADA to the Council, one copy to.the City Clerk, and one copy to the Florida Department of Community Affairs within thirty (30) days of the effective date of this Development Order. The CADA shall be prepared as follows: a. Where new, clarified, or revised information was prepared subsequent to submittal of the ADA but prior to issuance of this e .. Development Order, whether in response to a formal statement of information needed or otherwise, the original pages of the ADA will be replaced with revised pages. 13 Submitted into the public record in connection with ReM �� on r2/_kjj(,a Walter Foeman City Clerk 00-11 7 b. Revised pages will have a "Page Number (R) - Date" notation; with 'Page Number' being the number of the original ;page, '(R)" indicating that the page was revised, and "Date" stating the date of the revision. 16. The Consolidated Application for Development Approval is incorporated herein by reference and will be relied upon by the parties .in discharging their statutory duties under F.S. 380 (1987),' and local ordinances. Substantial compliance with the factual representations contained in the Consolidated Application.for Development Approval is a condition for approval unless waived or modified by.agreement among the Council, City, and Applicant, its successors; and/or assigns. 17. All terms, proposals, suggestions and procedures proposed in the Application for Development Approval, but not specifically incorporated in this Development Order, shall not be considered a part of the Consolidated Application for Development Approval insofar as they may .have been deemed to place a requirement on the City of Miami to take any action.or abstain from taking any action.' The terms of this Development ® Order shall control and any requirements of the City are specifically enumerated herein. 18. The City shall prepare an annual report and submit copies to the Council, the City Clerk and Florida Department of Community Affairs on or before each anniversary date of this Development Order. The annual report for Downtown Miami - Increment I must also be incorporated into the annual report required in the Downtown Miami Master Development Order so that a single annual report is compiled for the entire Projedt. The annual report shall include, at a minimum: a. A complete response to each question in Exhibit 3. Submitted into the publicrecord in Connection with _fternL on b. Identification and description of any known changes in the plan of Walter Foeman development, or in the representations contained in the CADA, or City Clerk in the phasing for the reporting year and for the next year. C. A summaryicomparison of Total Allowable Development and Net New Development proposed and actually approved during the year, 14 including locations; acreage; square footage, number of units; and other units of land uses ' included within Total Allowable Development, and the acreage zoned and.developed as City parks. d. An assessment of the Applicant's and the City's compliance with the conditions of approval contained in this Development Order and the commitments which are contained in the , Application -for ' Development Approval and which have been identified by the City, the Council; or the Department of Community Affairs as being si gni fi cant. e. Specification of any amended DRI applications for development approval or requests for a substantial deviation determination that were filed in the `reporting year or to be filed during the next year. f. An indication of change, if any, in City jurisdiction for any portion of the development since issuance of this Development Order. • 9• A-Statementthat all persons have been sent copies of the annual report in conformance with F.S. 380.06 (18) (1987). h. A copy of any recorded notice of the adoption of this Development Order or any subsequent modification that was recorded by the Applicant pursuant to F.S. 380.06(15) (1987). I. Any other information required by the Department of Community Affairs (DCA) in accordance with F.S. 380.06 (18)(1987). 19. The City shall enforce the requirements of the Dade County Shoreline Submitted into the public Development Review Ordinance (85-14) for all subsequent developments record in connection with item on -1-1-/1_14-011 within the Shoreline Development boundbry. Walter Foeman City Clerk 20. The deadline for commencing any development shall be two (2) years from the effective date of this Development Order. The termination date for completing development shall be December 31, 1992, provided that the Applicant, or its successors .and assigns, complies with paragraph 25 15 F./0`�`� herein. The termination date may only be modified in accordance with F.S. 380.06(19)(c) (1987). I 'The ® 21. effective date of this Development Order shall be 45 days from its transmittal to the Florida Department of Community Affairs, Council, and Applicant; provided; however, that if this Development Order is appealed, the effective date will. not start until the day after aTl appeals have been withdrawn or resolved pursuant to F.S. 380.07(2) (1987). 22. The City .shall not violate any of the conditions of this Development Order or, otherwise fail to act in substantial compliance with this Development Order or permit any property owner within the boundaries covered by this Development` Order to violate any of the provisions of this Development Order. In the event any entity controlled by the Applicant and/or the City or any permittee or landowner of any Parcel of Land violates (hereinafter "violator") the. provisions of this . Development Order, the City shall -stay the effectiveness of this Development Order as to toe Parcel 'of Land in which the violative • activity or conduct has occurred and withhold further permits, approvals, and services for development in said Parcel of Land upon passage of any appropriate resolution by the City, adopted in accordance with this section, finding that such violation has occurred. The violator will be given written notice by the City that states: 1) the nature of the purported violation, and 2) that unless the violation is cured within 30 days of said notice, the City will hold a public hearing to consider the matter within 60 days of the date of said notice.. In the event the violation is not curable in 30 days, the violator,', -submitted Into the public reCor In Connection ith diligent good faith efforts, as determined by the City, to cure the e/ �_ � i—Gg Item violation within that )eriod will obviate the need to hold a public Walter Foeman City Clerk hearing and this Development Order will remain in full force and effect unless the violator does not diligently pursue the curative action to completion within a reasrlable time, in which event the City will give 15 daysnotice to, the violator of its intention to stay the i effectiveness of this Development Orderand withhold further permits, • 16 0 0 "1 7 approvals, and services to the Parcel of Land in which the violation has occurred and until the violation i-s cured. The terms of this paragraph • may be modified from time to time by written agreement bye the ODA, the `City; and Council staff, to enable the City to enforce the terms of this Development Order to the fullest extent, while providing due process to all developers under this Development Order. 23. The Planning Director, City of Miami Planning Department; is hereby designated to monitor compliance with all conditions of this Development Order and shall have the duty and authority to interpret the provisions of this Development Order and to promulgate rulings; regulations and procedures necessary to implement it; provided the same are, not inconsistent with the -terms hereof or of F.S. 380 (1987); or duly promulgated and adopted rules thereunder. Appeals to decisions of the r — — Planning Director may be filed pursuant to procedures set forth in Article 30 of Ordinance 9500, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended. Any noncompliance shall be subject to the Provisions of paragraph 22 herein. ` 24. The South Florida Regional Planning Council report and recommendations, entitled "Development of Regional Impact Assessment for Downtown Miami - I.ncrement I", dated October 5, 1987, is incorporated herein by reference. 25. Within 30 days of the effective date of this Development Order, it shall be recorded with the Clerk, Dade County Circuit Court, pursuant to, F.S. 380.06(15) (1987), specifying that the Development Order runs with the land and is binding on the- Applicant, its successors, and'/or Submitted into the public assigns, jointly or severally. recor In connection ewilb r item on 26. The existence of this Development Order shall not act to limit or WajterFOemSn proscribe the rights of any person under F.S. 380 (1987) to file an City Clerk Application for Development Approval and obtain an individual development order for property covered by this Development Order, not withstanding the existence of this Development Order. In the event that such an individual development order is approved and becomes effective, i 17 00-1137 the individual develoomentorder ''shall 'tontro) 'Beyelopment -of 'the property covered by. the individual .:velooment order and the terms and • conditions of this Development Order shall no longer be binding upon the ,property. Any such individual development orders shall; by their terms, be consistent- with the objectives and conditions of this Development Order. • • 27. This Development Order shall not repeal; nor amend in any way, any other currently effective development order or building permit within the . subject area previously issued by the City Commission pursuant to F.S. 380 (19B7). This Development Order shall not create nor authorize the creation or imposition. of any additional requirements or restrictions, with respect to any present or futdre development under any currently effective Development Order or building permit issued prior hereto. Notwithstanding this paragraph, the City shall continue to have whatever authority pursuant to law it may. now. have or may acquire in the future (other than by virtue of this Development Order). 28. This" Development Order shall not create nor impose any additional requirements or restrictions upon the City with respect to its powers to enact impact fee or assessment ordinances on development, including Net New Development under this Development Order and future development of the City,. as such impact fees or assessments may be authorized by law. 29. In the event that a substantial deviation is determined under the terms of this Development Order or F.S. 380 (1987), the City shall, retain its ability to issue building permits and Major Use Special Permits and shall continue to do so unabated, subject to the terms and conditions"of this Development Order. 30. In the event that this Development. Order s subject to litigation wherein an injunction is issued staying the enforcement of, this SubMitted into the public Development Order, the City shall either, under this Development Ord m_ c rd,in or under the powers granted it by state law, be ,ermitted to continue tb' - On 29$ issue building permits, Major Use Special Permits and Certificates of WalferFOerrlen Occupancy until such time as a final resolution of the litigation City Clerk occurs. 18 00-1137 7q 77 N.W. 17 ST. IJI Lul I'Alm iLL LL d2 L JLL '� ��\\\�I I j II L? . 77; N Ui LLJ z UA U) N.W. 5 ST. th FLA j, F7 F 1, F"I 17, 77 GLER ST 1 cc II it I 1=0 S. ubmitted into the public record in connection Yvith O ff. 1 / ri7 �t 'm on L 'Z4 2L-C- Walter Foemart City Cledt DOWNTOWN MIAMI DRI BOUNDARY MAP 00-1137 EXHIBIT 2 r: • r �J LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: Begin at the intersection of the centerlines of N.W. Sth Street and N.W. 3rd Avenue (east side of N-S Expressway (I-95)), said point of ,beginning also being the N.W. corner of the district; thence run southerly along the center line of N.W. 3rd Avenue and the easterly side of the N-S Expressway to the centerline of West Flagler Street; thence westerly along the centerline of said West Flagler Street to the centerline of the Miami River; thence meandering southeasterly along the centerline of said Miami River to a point of intersection with the easterly right-of-way (R/W)' line of Aetro Rapid Transit R/W (formerly Florida East Coast (FEC) Railroad R/W) said R/W line. being 50 feet easterly of and parallel with the centerline of said Metro Rapid Transit R/W; thence run southerly and southwesterly along said easterly R/W line of Metro Rapid Transit to the intersection with the centerline of S.W. 15th Road; thence southeasterly along the cent2rline of 15th Road to a point of intersection with the southerly prolongation of the westerly line of COSTA BELLA DEVELOPMENT SUBDIVISION (107-14); thence northe'nsterly, northwesterly and northeasterly along said westerly line of COSTA BELLA to the intersection with the southerly right-of-way line of S.E. 14th Lane; thence southeasterly, northeasterly, northerly, and northwesterly along said southerly and westerly right-of-way line of S.E. 14th Lane and S.E. 14th Terrace to the intersection with the northwesterly property line of Lot 31 Block 2 of Amended Plat of POINT VIEW as recorded in Plat Book 2 at Page 93 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida; thence northeasterly along the northwesterly line of said Lot 31 to the northeasterly side of the existing ten foot alley in Block 2 of said POINT VIEW; thence southeasterly along the northeasterly side of said ten foot alley to the intersection with the property line SubMitted into the pubic between Lots 4 and 5 of said Block 2 of POINT VIEW; thence north^.nsterly reCOr in Connection with item on ale. said line of Lots 4 and 5 and its prolongation thereof to the - WaitefFoemeR centerline of S.E. 14th Street; thence southeasterly along said./...- City Clerk centerline of S.E. 14th Street to a point of intersection with the existing bulkhead and shoreline of Biscayne Bay; thence meandering northerly along"the existing bulkhead and shoreline of Biscayne Bay to a point of intersection with the southerly boundary of Claughton Island 19 00-1137 Bridge; thence easterly&g the said southerly R/k line of Coton Island Bri.dge to the intersection with the westerly bulkhead line of Claughton Island, said bulkhead line being part of the Metropolitan Dade County Bulkhead Line as recorded .in Plat Book 73 at Page 18 of the Public Records; thence southerly, easterly, northerly and westerly, following said.existing bulkhead and its westerly prolongation thereof around the island to the intersection with the mainland on the easterly shoreline of Biscayne Bay;. thence meandering in a northwesterly ,and - westerly direction along the shoreline of Biscayne Bay and the Miami River to the intersection with the easterly R/W line of Brickell Avenue Bridge (S.E. 2nd Avenue); thence north along said bridge to the existing bulkhead on the northerly shoreline of the Miami River; said bulk line also being the southerly boundary of the Dupont Plaza Center and Miami Center Joint Venture property; thence northeasterly along the southerly boundary of Dupont Plaza Center and Miami Center Joint Venture property to a point of intersection with the easterly property line of Chopin Associates and Miami Center Limited Partnership; said property line being along the shoreline of Biscayne Bay; thence northerly along, said easterly property line of Chopin Associates and Miami Center Limited • Partnership property along Biscayne Bay to the southerly property line of Bayfront Park; thence continuing northerly, northeasterly and northwesterly along the bulkhead line of Bayfront Park and the Bayfront Park Miamarina; thence continuing northerly along the bulkhead line of Biscayne Bay to a point of intersection with the centerline of N.E. 17th Street extended easterly; thence westerly along the centerline of N.E. 17th Street and its extension thereof to the easterly R/W line of the FEC Railroad; thence southerly along the easterly R/W line of the FEC Railroad to the limited access right-of-way of I-395; thence southeasterly and easterly along the limited access right-of-way of I-395 to the centerline of Biscayne Boulevard, thence southerly along the centerline of Biscay—, Boulevard to the centerline of N.E. 5th Street,- thence westerly along the centerline and N.E. and N.W. 5th Street to the point of beginning. The above described area contains approximately 839 acres. i • 20 Submitted into the public Pec®r in connection with Item F'2-" on Walter Foe man City Cleric 0®--1137 1� u �i STATE OF FLC..IDA BLWM-07-65 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS DIVISION OF RESOURCE PLANNING AND IdANAGEMENT BUREAU OF LAND AND WATER MANAGEMENT - 2571 Executive Center Circle, EasT Tallchassee, Florida 32301-8244. (904) A88-4925 , Subsection 380.06(16), Florida Statutes. places the responsibility. on the developer of an approved development of regional Impact (DRI) for submitting an annual report to the local government, the Regional Planning Council the Oeoartment of Community Affairs, and to all affected permit agencies, on the date speclfl,ed in the Oevelooment Order. The failure of a developer to submit the report on the date specified In the development order may result in the temporary suspension of the doveloomenT order by the local covernment unTII the annual report is submitted to the review ee_encies. This reouiremenT applies TO all developmenTS of regionmi imoacT which have been a2oroved since AUGUST 6. 1980. if you have any.Cuesticns abouT This reouir,eo reoorr; call The OR] Enforcement CoordinaTor aT, (904) 488-4925. Please send the original completed annual reoort To The designated local government official sTaTed in the eeveicomenT order with (1) cozy To eacn of the following:' a) The regional :lannina agency of jurisdiction; b) All affected permitting agencies: c) Devision of Resource Planning and MnnaaemenT Bureau of Lana and Water ManagemenT 2571 Executive Canter Circle, EasT Tallahassee, Florida 32301, Please formaT your AnAual Status Reaort after The format example provided below. , AN14UAL STATUS REPORT ReporTing Period: to Montn/Day/Tear P n,-rT/Day/rear Development: : Name oT DAI LocaTion: , �iTy �JInTV Developer: Name: �z)rnzanv Name Address: STreeT LOCATICn Submitted into the public recor in connection with AM t on .-I-h/LI/I G Walter Foeman City Clem . ;iTy, ..Tare, --i: C'J;e 0-11 / 67 -00 . • buhibit 3 .Page 2 BLK►�07- 8 S Page Two 1) Describe any changes made In the Drovosed plan of development, phasing, or In the reoresentatlons contained In the Application for Develooment Approval since the DeveloornenT of Regional Impact received approval. Please note any actions (suostantlal determinations) taken by local government To address these changes. Note: If a response Is to be more than one sentence, attach as Exhibit 'A' a dotal led descriptica of each chance and copies of The modified site plan drawings. Exhibit 'A' should also address the following additional items if applicable. a) -Describe chances In the plan of development or phasing for the repor;lnq year and for the subsequent years; b) State any known Incrementa•I DRI apDllcaTlons for develoomenT approval or recuesTs for a sutsTenTlal deviation determinaTlon that were filed in the rezoning year and To De filed C:;ring The next year; c) Attach a cooy of any notice of the ado::Ticn of -a develoomenT order or The suDseouenT modiflcaTlon of an adopted develo=:sent order That was recorded by The deve)oDer pursuant To Subsection 350.06(14)(d), F.S. 2) Has there been a chance in local government jurisdiction for -qny por.Ion of the CeveloomenT since the development order was issued? If so, has The annexing local government adootea a new Development of Regional Impact develoomenT order for the project? Please provide a ccDy of the order adopted by the annexino local oovernmenT. 3) Provide conies of any revised master plans, incremental' site plans, etc., not previously suamit-red. Note: If a response is to be more than one or two sentences, ariacn as Exhibit 'o'. 4) Pro ide a summary comparison of development activity proposed and actually conducted for the reporting year. ExamoIa: Number of dwellino units constructed, site Imorove,- ments, lots sold, acres mined, gross floor area constructed, barrels of storage capacity completed, permits obTainea, etc. Note: If a response is To be more Than one sentence, aTtacn as Exhibit 'C ", ;) Have env undeveloped tracts of land in The aevelo:menT • (other Tr.an individual sinale-fe-ilv lots) been s:IC To a sezeraTe entity or devel::er? If so, i�entify tree-, its siz=, !nQ The tUver. Please ;rovide ma.s wnicn snow the TracTS involve:. Submitted into the public record in_,connection with Item on 1. 2-b -ilgl Walter Flan City Clefs 00.1137 �ra�t -giver 68 • • J-87-1108 s7-1148 • ATION NO. A RESOLUTION CONCERNING THE DOWNTOWN MIAMI DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT, ENCOMPASSING AN AREA OF THE CITY OF MIAMI'UNDER THE JURISDICTION OF THE MIAMI DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST AREA.AS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN, PURSUANT TO AN APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL PROPOSED BY THE MIAMI DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY; AUTHORIZING A MASTER DEVELOPMENT ORDER; APPROVING SAID DEVELOPMENT OF _ REGIONAL IMPACT AFTER CONSIDERING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE SOUTH FLORIDA REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL AND THE CITY OF MIAMI PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD, SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS OF THE MASTER DEVELOPMENT ORDER ATTACHED HERETO AS EXHIBIT "A-, THE APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL INCORPORATED HEREIN BY REFERENCE; AND THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE SOUTH FLORIDA REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL INCORPORATED HEREIN BY REFERENCE; MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW; PROVIDING THAT THE MASTER DEVELOPMENT ORDER SHALL BE BINDING ON THE APPLICANT AND SUCCESSORS IN INTEREST; DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO SEND COPIES OF THIS RESOLUTION AND MASTER DEVELOPMENT ORDER TO AFFECTED AGENCIES AND THE APPLICANT; DIRECTING THE CITY MANAGER TO TAKE ALL ACTIONS NECESSARY TO FULFILL THE CITY'S OBLIGATIONS UNDER THE MASTER DEVELOPMENT ORDER; AND PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE. 12/Bi 187 Master WHEREAS, on November 26, 1986, the Downtown Development Authority of the City of Miami submitted a complete Application for Development Approval for a Development of Regional Impact to the South Florida Regional Planning Council, the Florida Department of Community.Affairs, and the City of Miami pursuant to F.S. 380.06 (1987), for the ongoing development through the year 2007 of a portion of the area within the DOA jurisdiction, as legally described in the Development Order attached hereto; and WHEREAS, the Miami Planning Advisory Board, at its ,meeting held on December 9, 1987, following an advertised public hearing, adopted Resolution No. 74-87 by 6 to 2 vote, recommending approval of the Master Development Order for Downtown Miami ',as attached hereto; and VHEREAS, on December 10, 1987, the City Commission conducted a public hearing pursua.t to F.S. 380.06 (1987) and Submitted into the, - WHEREAS, the City Commission considered the Application for DevelopmenxvC{Ard in Coraf>ecl-t;'f� withApproval, the report and recommendations of the South Florida RegionaeM OTfu, Planning Council , and each element required to be considered by F.S. 380.06 Waiter Fpeman (1987) ; and .10 City/ Clefk AT TA R-':'%` 3 CITY "^ - qw a w Alia Q®-1137 WHEREAS, the City Comion determined that all requirements notice and other legal requirements for the issuance of the propose Master Development Order had been complied with; and • WHEREAS, the City Commission deems it advisable and in the best interest of the general welfare of the City of Miami to issue a Master Development Order as hereinafter set forth; _ NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1: The Findings of Fact end Conclusions of Law are made with respect to the Project as described in the Master Development Order for Downtown Miami, which is attached hereto as.Exhibit "A" and made a part hereof by reference, and is applicable to an area of the City of Miami under the Jurisdiction of the Downtown Development Authority with the exception of the Southeast Overtown/Park West Redevelopment District, as more particularly described in Exhibit "A". Section 2: The Master Development Order for Downtown Miami (Exhibit 'A") is hereby granted and issued. Section 3. . The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to immediately send certified copies of this Resolution together with Exhibit "A" • and copies of all exhibits, attachments, and written materials, including portions of ordinances referenced in the text of the Master Development Order to: The Florida Department of Community Affairs, 2571 Executive Center Circle East, Tallahassee, Florida, 32301; The South Florida Regional Planning Council, 3440 Hollywood Boulevard, Suite 140, Hollywood, Florida, 33021; and the Downtown Development Authority; Suite 1800, One Biscayne Tower, Miami, Florida 33132. Section 4. The City Manager is hereby directed to take all actions necessary to fulfill the City's obligations under the terms of the Master Development Order. section 5. In the event that any portion or section of this Resolution or the Master Development Order for Downtown Miami (Exhibit "A") is determined to be invalid, illegal, or unconstitutional by a court or agency of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall in no manner affect the remaining portions of this Resolution or the Master Development Order for Downtown ,i* " (Exhibit AM OMMitted into the public ), which shall remain in full force and effect. 1'eCOr n ® item c nnection with on L24 2 Walter Foeman Q►7 _ City Cleat 00-113'7 PASSED AND ADOPTED this 10thday of Decemoer 1987. ii;.VIER L. SUAREZ, MAYOR ATTEST: �. rtMATTY HIRAI, CITY CLERK PREPARED AND APPROVED BY: L E. MAXWELL J SISTANT CITY ATTORNEY APPROVED AS 0 FORM AND CORRECTNESS: CIA A. DOUGHER CITY ATTORNEY is U 14 • 3 Submitted into the public record in connection with item on / /�L Walter.Foeman City Clem 00-113"7 • MASTER DEVELOPMENT ORDER �ster .EXHIBIT "A" NAME OF DEYELOPMENT: Downtown.Miami NAME OF DEVELOPER: Downtown Development Authority of the City of Miami AUTHORIZED AGENT OF DEVELOPER: Roy F. Kenzie, Executive. Director, Downtown Development Authority and Sergio Rodriguez, Director, City of Miami Planning Department, or their successors. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The Project consists of development in Downtown Miami through the Year 2007, including the following land uses and increments: Land Uses Increment I Increment II Increment III Totals Office (gross square feet) 79100,000 39600,000 39700,000 14,400,000 Government Office (gross.square feet) 300,000 250,000 200,000 750,000 , Retail/Service (gross square feet) 1,050,000 400,000 500,000 1,950,000 Hotel • (rooms) 1,000 500 1,100 2,600 Residential (dwel.ling units) 3,550 2,550 2,920 9,020 Convention (gross square feet) 500,000 0 0 500,000 Wholesale/Industrial (gross square feet) 1,050,000 0 1,050,000 2,100,000 Institutional (gross squalc feet) 300,000 0 300,000 600,000 Attractions/Recreation (seats) 3,400 10600 51000 10,000 Pursuant to F.S. 380.06(22) (1987)9' the Project specifies the total amount of development planned for each land use category, but provides flexibility for such development to be located anywhere within the Project Area, subject to local land development regulations. The Project Area includes all property within the boundaries of the Downtown Development Authority, with the 6ubmitted into the public exception of that area between NE/NW 5th Street and I-395 known as ParrWlClZPfj 6n COnr)eCtiOrl with West% as illustrated on the map in Exhibit 1 and described ' i n Exhibit horn PZ3--- on %—i/j--1/ - Walter Foeman attached hereto. The Project Area contains a total of approximately 839 acres City"Clerk of land, including approximately 78 acres currently zoned and developed as City parks. • 1 00 -113i LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SUBJECT OERTY: See Exhibit 2. DEFINITIONS: For the purposes of this Development Order, the following terms • shall be defined as follows: ADA or Application for Development Approval: The original Application for Development Approvai for Downtown Miami filed by the DDA on November 25; 1986, pursuant to F.S. 380.06 (1987). CADA or Consolidated Application for Development Approval: The revised ADA prepared pursuant to paragraph 21 on page 12 herein. Certificate of Occupancy: A permanent or to np orary and/or partial Certificate of Occupancy issued; pursuant to Section 47 of the South Florida Building Code, for any 'Net New Development" as defined herein. City: The City of Miami, Florida. Council: The South Florida.Regional Planning Council'. DDA or Downtown Development Authority: The Downtown Development Authority of the City of -Miami, Florida. • DERM: The Metropolitan Dade County Department of Environmental Resources Management. DRI: Development of Regional Impact. Development Credits: The individual units of land uses included within Total Allowable Development, as measured by squire footage, or number of dwelling units, hotel rooms, or seats. Major Use Special Permit: A special permit issued by the City Commission pursuant to Ordinance 9500,, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami; as amended. Submitted into the public record in connection with Net New Development: Any construction or reconstruction which will resapt*niv On a net increase, within any "Parcel of Land", of residential dwelling units, Walter Foeman , hotel rooms, seats in attractions/recreation facilities or gross square City Clerk footage for office, government office, retail/service, convention, 2 0-117 wholesale/industrial or, Vi utonai uses. Ldnu u.demolition of a building oructure may be credited against the p *ed new land uses for purposes of calculating the net increase, if the Planning Director determines that there was a valid Certificate of Occupancy existing • on the effective date of this Development Order for the land uses to be demolished. If 'a change of land use is proposed, the Planning Director may . credit the prior land use against the proposed land use based upon equivalent — impacts as measured by peak hour vehicle trip generation. Any activity which has on the effective date of this Developi,•-�nt Order a val,i.d building permit or any currently effective development order shall not be included as Net New Development. The Planning Director may exclude from Net New Development any small development under 10,000 square feet' in floor area; if he finds that po such development would have impact as measured by peak hour vehicle trips. A Parcel of Land: Any quantity of land capable of being described with such definiteness that its location and boundaries may be established, and which is designated by its owner or developer as land to be-used.or developed as a unit or which has been used. or developed as a.unit. Project: That Project described in the "PROJECT DESCRIPTION" "on Page 1 herein. Project Area: The area included within the legal description in Exhibit 2. Total Allowable Development: The quantity of Net New Development for which Certificates of Occupancy may be issued under the terms and conditions of this Development Order, together with any attendant Incremental Development Order, and as may be modified pursuant to F.S. 380.06(19) (1987). The City may permit simultaneous increases and decreases between the land'use categories, provided that the regional impacts of the land uses as changed will not exceed the adverse regional impacts of the Project as originally approved, as measured by total peak hour vehicle trips. FINDINGS OF FACT: The following findings of fact are hereby confirmed and ,adopted wi0mltted into the public record 'n connection with respect to the Project: Itedrl on Walter Foeman City Clerk 3 00-1137 • 0 ,A. The findings and deter tions of fact set forth in the recit of the . 16 resolution to this Development Order are hereby confirmed.. B. The real property which is the subject of this Development Order is legally described in Exhibit 2. C. The ODA filed the ADA with the City, the Council, and the Florida Department 6f Community Affairs. D. The ADA has. been filed by the ODA pursuant to F.S. 380.06(22) (1987 ) authorizing a downtown development authority to apply for development approval and receive a development order for any or all of the area within its jurisdiction. Individual developments are not identified or required to be identified in the CADA.. E. The purpose of the CADA is to identify and assess probable regional impacts and to obtain approval for Total Allowable Development in accordance with the general guidelines set forth in this Development Order and the CADA. The concept is to recognize the Project Area as a single area of high intensity. development add to focus the DRI review process primarily on the impacts that Total Allowable Development within the area will have on land, water, transportation, environmental, community services, energy and other resources and systems of regional significance. The CADA seeks a single DRI review process for overall phased development of the downtown area rather than requiring each individual DRI scale development within the downtown area to -file for separate DRI reviews. F. Development within the Project Area is expected to continue to be accomplished over an extended period of time by a variety of developers, which may include the City. These developers may re;pond to market demand and technologies that can only be estimated in the CADA. The CADA and the DO are intended to serve as flexible guides for a. 'planned development of the 'project Area rather than a precise blueprint for its aevelopment. Therefore, pursuant to F.S. 380.06(21)(b) (1987)' the CADA seeks master development approval for three increments of development over a period of approximately twenty years and specific,developmeenUbCTlitted Into the pUbl'tG , record in connection with approval for Increment I, which is the first phase ofdevelOMPMIr n 2—Z on projected for a period of approximately five years. Subsequent WalterFoeman incremental applications may need to be adjusted to more nearly serve as City Clerk 4 K. • L. M. N. P. Q. R. S. T. a living guide i�.co�ing the evolution of marreL UCWUIIU QIIU technologies. 0 The Project Area contains a'total of approximately 839 acres, including approximately 78 acres presently, zoned and developed as City parks. . The CADA proposes Net New Development within the Project Area for the land uses, quantities and phases defined herein as Total Allowable Development. The Project is not located in an area of critical state concern as designated pursuant to F.S. 380 (1987). A comprehensive review of the probable impacts that will be generated by the Project has been conducted by various City departments; as reflected in the CADA, and the South Florida Regional Planning Council staff. This Development Order is consistent with the report and recommendations of the South Florida Regional Planning Council; entitled "Development of Regional Impact Assessment 'for Downtown Miami - Master"; dated October 5, 1987. The South Florida Regional Planning Council recommends approval of the Project, and all conditions to which such approval is subject are reflected herein. The Project is consistent with the applicable portion of the State land development plan and the Regional Plan for South Florida. , The 'Project is in conformity with the adopted Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan. The Project is in accord with the district zoning classifications of Zoning Ordinance 9500, as amended. The Project will have a favorable impact on the economy of the City. The Project will efficiently use public transportation facilities. The Project will favorably affect the need for people to' find adequate housing reasonably accessible to their places of employment. The Project will efficiently use necessary public facilities. The Project will include adequate mitigative measures to assure ^that it will not adversely effect the environment and natural resources of the City. The Project will not adversely affect living conditions in the City.Submitted into the public record in connection with The Project will not adversely affect public safety. item on j�,/_—W—c* There is a public need for the Project. Walter Foeman ' City. Clerk 5 00-11 7 0 • 'CONCLUSIONS OF LAW: That, having made the findings of fact contained above, the City Commission hereby concludes as a matter -of law, the following: A. , The ODA constitutes a "downtown development authority" as defined in F.S. 380 (1987), and is authorized by F.S. 380 (1987) to make application for development approval and receive a deveTopment order. B. The Project complies with the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan, is consistent with the orderly development and goals of the City of Miami, and complies. with local land develoF,cent•regulations. C. The Project does not unreasonably interfere with the achievement of the objectives of the adopted State land development plan applicable to the City of Miami or the Regional Plan for South Florida. D. The Project is consistent .with the report and recommendations of the South Florida Regional Planning Council and does not unreasonably interfere with any, of the considerations and objectives set forth in F.S. 380 .(1987) . E. Changes in the Project which do not exceed the Total Allowable Development or which do not result in a net reduction of more than 5 percent in total acreage `zoned and .developed as City parks, shall not constitute a substantial deviation under F.S. 380 (1987). ACTION TAKEN: That, having made the findings of fact and reached the conclusions of law set forth above, it is ordered that the Project is hereby approved, subject to the following conditions: THE CITY, ITS SUCCESSORS, AND/OR ASSIGNS JOINTLY OR SEVERALLY MAY ISSUE BUILDING PERMITS AND CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY FOR NET NEW DEYELOPMENT PURSUANT TO AN APPROYED DEYELOPMENT ORDER FOR EACH INCREMENT DESCRIBED HEREIN AND SHALL: 1. Require all development pursuant to this Development Order'to be in accordance with applicable building codes, land development regul-ati Hs? tied into the public ordinances and other laws. record in onnection with item ?_2-J on _�ILK�GU ' Walter Foeman City Cles 6 97-1148 00-1137 L, MILI1111 U WUIILIIy u�.-•--• _ ___- ' and implement a unifo*dinance that incorporates a require* that Net New Developments shall mulch, spray or plant grass in exposed areas to prevent soil erosion and minimize air pollution during construction. • , 3. Within 6 months of the effective date of this Development Order, adopt and.implement a uniform ordinance that incorporates a requirement that Net New Developments shall place temporary screens, berms, and/or rip - rap around sites under construction to filter or retain stormwater. runoff during construction. • 4. Within 6.months of the effective date this Development Order, adopt and implement a uniform ordinance or establish an accepted procedure to require Net New Developments to design; construct and maintain stormwater management systems to meet the following standards: a. Retain the runoff from at least a 5-year storm on each Parcel of Land wherever feasible and construct drainage systems as proposed in the -Consolidated Application for Development Approval (CADA). Consistent with the CADA, individual drainage systems must be designed to retain at least the first one -inch of stormwater runoff within drainage wells and exfiltration trenches. b. Install pollutant retardant structures (catch basin with down -turned inlet pipe or other Dade County DERM-approved device) to treat all stormwater runoff at each individual drainage structure and/or well, and periodically remove pollutant accumulations. C. Limit application of pesticides and fertilizers in vegetated storm water retention areas to once per year for preventive maintenance and to emergencies, such as uncontrolled insect infestation. d. Y-cuum sweep all parking lots of eleven or more vehicle spaces and private roadways serving the parking lots at least once per 9ee_kMitted into the public record in connection vvith e. Both during and following construction, prevent the direct RN-41r o� on stormwater runoff ( that has not been pre-treated pursuant to Walter Foe,nan City Clerk) Condytion 4a. above) into surface waters. 7 • • 5. Require Net New Develo eat to comply with Dade County hazardowaste requirements by the adoption and impi;!mentation of a uniform ordinance, as may be found by the City to be c plicable and necessary, providing for hazardous materials accident prevention, mitigation, and response standards, as described in a, through h. below. These standards shall be maintained by individual developers who shall require by lease agreement or building rule that all tenants classified by a SIC code listed in Appendix 12A-8 of the CADA, incorporated herein by reference, that use, handle, store, display; or generate hazardous materials (materials that are ignitable, corrosive, toxic, or reactive), including those identified on page 6 of Appendix 12A-8 of the CADA comply with these standards; provided however, that the uses in and the wastes listed in Appendix 12A-8 of the CADA shall be simultaneously amended upon the addition or deletion of any or all of the listed uses. materials, or wastes by amendment to the "County and Regional Hazardous Waste _Assessment Guidelines" incorpurated by Rule 17-31.03(2), Florida Administrative Code. At a minimum, these standards shall; a. Require that buildings or portions of buildings where hazardous materials or hazardous wastes, as defined above, are to be used, displayed, handled, generated, or stored shall be constructed with impervious floors, without drains, to ensure containment and facilitate cleanup of any spill or leakage. b. Prohibit any outside storage of hazardous materials or hazardous waste. The exception to this condition is for retail. goods typically associated with residential nursery activity, such as lawn fertilizers and garden pesticides. Those areas used for the storage of these goods are subject to the requirement contained in Condition 5c. below. C. Require that any area used for loading and/or unloading of hazardous material be covered and equipped with a 'collection system to contain leakage and accidental spills. Submitted into the public recor in connection with item —_ on��/�� Walter Foeman City Clerk 8 �•+i1� 00-113'7 d. Require all haza waste generators to.cont.act with aensed public or private —hazardous waste disposal service or p ssing facility and provide Dade County DERM copies of the following forms of documentation or proper hazardous was , te management practices: - a hazardous waste manifest; - ..a shipment to a permitted hazardous waste management facility; or - a confirmation of receipt of materials from a recycl er or a waste exchange operation.. e. Prohibit generation of hazardous effluents; unless adequate facilities, approved by Dade Ccunty DERM and Florida Department of Environmental Regulation, are constructed and used by tenants generating such effluents. f. Dispose of hazardous sludge materials generated by effluent pre-treatment in a manner approved by the Federal Environmental Protection Agency and the Florida Department of Environmental Regulation. • g. _ Notify any tenant generating wastes of the penalties for improper disposal of hazardous waste pursuant to F.S. 403.727. h. Allow reasonable access to facilities for monitoring by Dade County DERM, Council staff, and the Florida Department of Environmental Regulation to assure compliance with this Development Order and all applicable laws and regulations. 6. Enact an ordinance requiring Net New Development to remove all invasive exotic plants, including Melaleuca; Casuarina; and Brasilian Pepper, from their Parcel of Land as the parcel is cleared, and use only those plant species identif-ed in Appendix 8-4 of the CADA for landscaping. Additional species may be used only if written approval is provided by Council staff. Such approval will be based on the species under Into `the publit record in CLt� nec--lion bvith consideration meeting the following criteria: item on a. does not require excessive irrigation Wa.Iter Foeman City Cle(k 9 00--113'7 b. does not re(, re cessive fertilizer appli, .ion c* is not prone toct infestation or other pests d. is not prone to disease e. does not have invasive root systems. • f. such other criteria as may be appropriate I 7. Coordinate -with appropriate agencies to ensure that those areas frequented by the West Indian manatee and Brown pelican are properly identified to reduce the impact of development- on these species. Measures may include, but are not limited to; warning signs; idle speed zones, etc. Provide information to developments located adjacent to the Miami River or Biscayne'Bay which may adversely impact these species, which shall be distributed by the developer to users of the development. This information should include, but is not to be limited to, pamphlets and signs on frequency of site use, man -induced adverse impacts, and measures to avoid these impacts. 8. Direct the City Manager to establish procedures whereby the Police Department and Fire Department shall make recommendations to incorporate security measures into the design and operation of Net New Development. • 9. Collaborate with the Dade County School Board, by providing planning information and information on Net New Development of residential units, to address concerns regarding the availability and access to schools for students from future residential development within the project area. 10. Encourage the incorporation of energy conservation measures into the design and operation of Net New Development by requiring that,. at a minimum, all Net New Development shall be constructed in conformance with the specifications of the State of Florida Energy Efficiency Code for Building Construction (State Energy Code). 11. As part of the building permit application, prior to approving any activity involving rehabilitation, demolition, or structural changes toSubm)tted into historic buildings listed in Exhibit 3 herein; require the applicant toeco�d the Public item in connection s submit to the Florida Department of State Division of Archives, History, on and Records Management and the City of Miami Planning Department Walter Foeman photographs; of the structure and a description of proposed activities City Cie,,, 10 Od-113'7 • to approving any pea. for ground disturbing activities 9 ted to construction or tree removal within the archaeological zones listed in Exhibit 4 herein, require the• applicant to contact these same two • agencies to make arrangements to survey and assess the area. This cbndition,will not apply to those historic buildings and archeological zones that 'are designated as Heritage Conservation districts pursuant to —. paragraph 12 below. 12. Attempt to have all properties and archaeological zones in Exhibits 3 and 4 herein designated as Heritage Conservation districts under'Article 16 of Zoning Ordinance 9500, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended. 13. For all development activity, other than development on sites contained in Exhibits 3 and 4 herein (since these sites are subject to Condition 11. and 12. above), as part of the building permit application require the applicant, pursuant to state law, to notify the Florida Department of Statb Division of Archives, History and Records Management of construction schedules, and where pgtentially significant historical or archaeological artifacts are uncovered during construction, permit State • and local archeological officials to survey and excavate the site. When required by law, delay construction for up to 3 months in any portion of the construction site necessary to permit the archeological survey and excavation to be completed. 14. Monitor development and redevelopment activities to ensure that there is no net loss of low-income housing opportunities within the City of Miami. Any net loss of such units within the Project Area shall be counterbalanced by a gain in another area within the City of Miartli. 15. Withhold the issuance of building permits for Net New Development that cannot obtain a letter of availability from the appropriate agency that wastewater treatment capacity will be sufficient to meet the needs of Submitted into the that development. r Zin�onnectio �ebth J,G n �r, on Z; c/ � 16. Withhold the issuance of building permits for Net New Development that Walter Foeman cannot obtain a letter of availability from the appropriate agency that City Clerk • 11 0 113'7 an adequate water pp I xi i i oe avai I du l e u, III,�.� • ---- - - - - development. " 17. Withhold the issuance of building permits for Net New Development that • cannot obtain a letter of availability from the appropriate agency that solid waste disposal capacity will be sufficient to meet the needs of that development. — 18. Have the authority to assess development for its proportionate share of the costs of improvements and/or services necessary to monitor and/or is • mitigate any adverse impacts. The City shall also have authority to assess development its proportionate share of the costs attributable to preparation of the master plan. for' downtown; the Application for Development Approval; and this Development Order', as well as the future costs of reviewing individual development applications, monitoring compliance with this Development Order, and any other costs reasonably related to the administration and implementation of this Development Order. "If necessary, the City shall establish a procedure for rebating any funds collected in excess of those funds attributable to a particular development and necessary -to implement this Development Order or any ordinance or procedure required to monitor and enforce compliance with this Development Order and to mitigate the impacts of Total Allowable Development." MONITDRING, REPORTING, AND ENFORCO EHT: 19. The City shall monitor the capacity of Total Allowable Development by reserving the amount of Development Credits necessary for Net New Development at a time, to be determined by the City', prior to or coincident with approval of a building permit or Major Use Special permit. The City shall place reasonable time limits on all building permits and Major Use Special Permits to assure that construction progresses within a reasonable period of time after approval to prevent stockpiling of reservations for Development Credits. The time per' uVdlllt$ed into the public established by the City shall take into account the size of the pro;-5osedrd in connection With ii 4-_J. on Net New Development in relationship to the time necessary to I7ogi Walter Foeman construction. City Clerk 12 U0-113'7 420. Upon the issuance of *Certificate of Occupancy for any New Development, the City shall .make .appropriate subtractions rom the amount of Total Allowable Development under this Development Order. No Certificates of Occupancy shall be issued for Net New Development which would, in -the aggregate, exceed the amount of Total Allowable Development under this Development Order. — 21. The City shall integrate all original and supplemental ADA information into a Consolidated Application for Development Approval (CADA) and submit two copies of the CADA to the Council, one copy to the City Clerk, and one copy to the Florida Department of Community Affairs within thirty (30) days of the effective date of this -Development Order. The CADA shall be prepared as follows: a. Where new, clarified, ore revised information was prepared subsequent to submittal of the ADA but prior to issuance of this Oevelopment order, whether in response'to a formal statement of information needed or otherwise, the original pages of the ADA will be replaced with revised pages. ® b. Revised pages will have a 'Page Number (R) - Date" notation, with. "Page Number" being the number of the original .page, "(R)" indicating that the page was revised, and "Date" stating.the date of the revision. 22. The Consolidated Application for Development Approval is incorporated herein by reference and will be relied. upon by the parties in discharging their statutory duties under F.S. 380 (1987), and local ordinances. Substantial compliance with the factual representations contained in the Consolidated Application for Development Approval is a condition for approvhl unless waived or modified by agreement aRong the Council. City, and Applicant, its successors, and/or assigns. Submitted into the public record i�n��corlrle ,ts®rt with 23. All terms, proposals, suggestions and' procedures proposed in of m 2on, �- Application for Development Approval, but not specifically incorporated Walter Foeman in this Development order, shall not be considered a cart of the City Clem Consolidated Application for Development Approval insofar as they may 13 00-1137 • 0 24. 25. Question 12: Other Public Facilities C. Energy 0. Education E. Recreation. and Open Space Question 13: Housing have been deemed ti us 1a a requirement one t,i" action or abstain from ng any action. The terms of this D * pment Order shall control and any requirements of the City are specifically enumerated herein. The following regional issues as they appear in the Consolidated Application for Development Approval have been sufficiently reviewed for the total Project (extending through the year 2007) and shall not be required to be reviewed -as each incremental portion of the Downtown Miami DRI is submitted: Maps: Map A - Location Maps B-1, B-2, B-3,•B-4 - Aerial Photo(s) Map C-5 - Flood Zones Map D-1 - Existing Land Use Map E - Soils Map F - Vegetation Maps G-1, G-Z Drainage Maps I-1, I-2, I-3, I-4 - Public Facilities Question 5: Water Quality Question 6: Wetlands Question 7: Flood Prone Areas Question 8: Vegetation and Wildlife Question 9: Historical and Archaeological Sites Submitted into the public record in onnection with item f?z_�L on ��/ J/ u Walter Foeman The following regional issues as they appear in the Consolidated MY Clerk Application for Development Approval have not been sufficiently reviewed for the total Project (extending through the year 2007) and, as appropriate, will be required to be reviewed as each incremental portion of the Downtown Miami DRI is submitted: 14 Question 1: Applicant Ormati on Maps: Map N - Master Development ® Maps J series - Transportation !twork Display Graphics and Boards Question 3: Project Description Question 4: Air Quality Question 10: Employment and Economic Characteristics Question 11: Transportation Question 12: Other Public Facilities A. Wastewater, Water, and Solid Waste B. Health Care, Police, and Fire 26. Grounds for denial by the South Florida Regional Planning Council of any subsequent applications for an incremental portion of this proposed development will be limited to any unresolved issues pertaining to Question 4: Air Quality and/or Question 11: Transportation. 27. The- City shall prepare an annual report and submit copies to the Council, the City Clerk and Florida Department of Community Affairs on or before each anniversary date of this Development Order. Aseach development increment receives a Development Order, the annual report shall include the development covered by the incremental Development Order so that a single annual reportiis compiled for the entire Project. The annual report shall include, at a minimum: a. A complete response to each question in Exhibit 5. ,. b. Identification and description of any known changes in the -plan of development, or in the representations contained in the CADA, or in the phasing for the reporting year and for the next,year. Submitted into the public record in connection with C. A summary comparison of Total Allowable Development and Net Nlewm PlonJ.-I Development yapproved, during the year, p proposed and actually Walter Foeman City Clerk inclUing locations, acreage, square footage, number of units, and 15 00-113'7 other unity land uses included •wiinin Total lowable Development; and�Lfie acreage zoned and developed as City rks. d. An assessment of the Appl_icant's and the. City's compliance with ® the conditions of approval contained in this Development Order and the, commitments which are contained in the Application for Development Approval and which have been identified by the City, the Council, or the Department of Community Affairs as being. significant. e. Specification of any.known incremental or amended DRI applications for development approval or requests for a substantial deviation determination that were filed in the reporting year or to be filed during the next year. f. An indication of change, if any, in City jurisdiction for any portion of the development since issuance of this Development Order. 9. A statement that all persons have been sent copies of the annual report in conformance with F.S'. 380.06(18) (1987). • h. A copy of any recorded notice of the adoption of this Development Order or any subsequent modification that was recorded by the Applicant pursuant to F.S. 380.06(15) (1987). i. A report from DERM of any known violations of the hazardous waste requirements contained in paragraph 5 herein. J. The number of low -incoming housing units lost from, demolition and conversion within the Project Area, as well as the total number of new low income housing units within the City. k• Any other information required by the Department of Community Affairs (DCA) in accordance with F.S. 380.06(18)(1987). Submitted into the public record in connection ' 28. The City shall enforce the requirements of the Dade County Sho i � t>6iinle ��— �n Development Review Ordinance (85-14) for all subsequent developments Walter Foeman within the Shoreline Development boundary. City Cleric, 16 ly. the aeadline tor. emencing any aevetopmens sna, 611 j-UM the effective date oOis Development Order. The terminati late for completing development shall be December 310 2007, provided that the Applicant, or its successors and assigns, complies with paragraph 34 ® herein. The termination date may only be modified in accordance with p.S. 380.06(19)(c) (1987). 30. The effective date of this Development Order shall be 45 days -from its transmittal to the Florida Department of Community Affairs, Council,•and Applicant; provided, however, that if this Development Order is appealed, the effective. date will* not 'start until the day after all appeals have been withdrawn or rasolved pursuant to F.S. 380.07(2) (1987). 31. The City shall not violate any of the conditions of this Development Order or otheri+ise fail -to act in substantial compliance with this Development Order or permit any property owner within the boundaries covered by this Development Order to violate any of the provisions of this Development Order. In the event any entity controlled by the Applicant and/or the City or any permittee or landowner of any Parcel of Land violates (hereinafter "violator") the provisions of this Development Order, the, City shall stay the effectiveness of this Development Order as to the Parcel of Land, in which the violative activity or conduct has occurred and withhold. further permits, approvals, and .services for development in said Parcel of Land, upon passage of any appropriate resolution by the City, adopted in accordance with this section, finding that such violation has occurred. The violator will be given written notice by the City that states: 1) the nature of the purported violation, and 2) that unless the violation is cured within 30 days of said notice, the City will hold a public hearing to consider the matter within 60 days of the date of said notice. In the event the violation is not curable in 30 days, the violator's diligent good.:faith efforts, as determined by the City; to cure the violation within that period will obviate the need to hold a pu'blLi'Mitted into the public record in connection with hearing and this Development Order will remain in full force and aiff cat l on unless the violator does not diligently pursue the curative action to Walter Foenlan ' City Clerk ® 17 00-113"7 completion within a able time; in which event the City give 15 days notice to the violator of its intention to 41 the effectiveness of this Development Order and withhold further permits, approvals, and services to the Parcel of Land in which the violation has occurred and until the violation is cured. The terms oflthis paragraph may be modified from time to time by written agreement by the ODA, the City, and Council staff, to enable the City to enforce the terms of this Development Order to the fullest extent, while providing due process to all Developers under this Development Order. 32. The Planning Director, City of Miami 'Planning Department; is hereby designated to monitor compliance with all conditions of this Development Order and shall have the duty and authority to interpret the provisions of this Development Order and to promulgate rulings, regulations and .procedures necessary to implement it, provided the same are not inconsistent with the terms hereof or of F.S. 380 (1987), or duly promulgated and adopted rules thereunder. Appeals to decisions of the Planning -Director .may be filed pursuant to procedures set forth in " Article 30 of Ordinance 9500, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended. Any noncompliance shall be subject to the ® prov.i sions of paragraph 31� herein. 33. The South Florida Regional Planning Council DRI . report and recommendations, entitled "Development of Regional Impact Assessment for Downtown Miami - Master", dated October 5, 1987, is incorporated herein by reference.. 34. Within 30 days of the effective date of this Development Order, it shall be recorded with the Clerk, Dade County Circuit Court, pursuant to F.S. 380.06(15) (1987). specifying that the Development Order runs with the land and is binding"on the Applicant, its successors, and/or assigns, jointly or severally. Submitt ed into the public pith on / 35. The existence of this Development Order shall not act td limit.j' n(1 WalterFOeman proscribe the rights of any person under F.S. 380 (1987) !to file an city Owl( Application for -evelopment Approval and obtain an indiv toufal development order for property covered by this Development Order, not 18 00 1137 40. Upon the adoption of the local government comprehensive plan Want to F.S. 163.3161 (1985), as amended, for the City of Miami, the City may ® rescind this Master Development C.:'er at the completion of the first Increment in the event that the City, after a public hearing, deems such action is in the best interest of the City. r Submitted into the public record in connection vuith item 2L-C ors-/-2/&//4z Walter Foeman City Clerk • 20 00_1137 IL - �cC� I �� Submitted into the public recor in -connection with ' item � on .j2/l N cep Waller Foeman City Clerk 0p' � • DOWNTOWN MIAMI DRI BOUNDARY MAP to -A 00-113°7 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF OECT PROPERTY: Begin at the intersection of the centerlines of N.W. Sth Street and N.W. 3rd Avenue (east side of N-S Expressway (I-95)), said point of • beginning also being the. N.W. corner of the district; thence run southerly.along the center line of N.W. 3rd Avenue and the easterly side of'the N-S-Expressway to the centerline of West Flagler Street; thence westerly along the centerline of said West Flagler Street to the centerline of the Miami River; thence meandering southeasterly along 'the centerline of said Miami River to a point of intersection with the easterly right-of-way (R/W) line of Metro Rapid Transit R/W (formerly Florida East Coast (FEC) Railroad R/W) said R/W line being 50 feet easterly of and parallel with the centerline of said Metro Rapid Transit R/W; thence run. southerly and southwesterly along said easterly R/W line of Metro Rapid Transit to the intersection with the centerline of S.W. 15th Road; thence southeasterly along the centerline of 15th Road to a point of intersection with the southerly prolongation of the westerly line of COSTA BELLA DEVELOPMENT SUBDIVISION (107-14); thence - northeasterly, northwesterly and northeasterly along said westerly line of'COSTA BELLA to the intersection with the southerly right-of-way line ` • of S.E. 14th Lane; thence southeasterly, northeasterly. 7 northerly, and northwesterly along said southerly and westerly right-of-way line of S.E. 14th Lane and S.E. 14th Terrace to the intersection -with the northwesterly property line of Lot 31 Block 2 of Amended Plat of POINT VIEW as recorded in Plat Book 2 at Page 43 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida; thence northeasterly along the northwesterly line of said Lot 31 to the northeasterly side of the existing ten foot alley in Block 2 of said POINT VIEW; thence southeasterly along the northeasterly side of said ten foot alley to the intersection with the property line between Lots 4 and 5 of said Block 2 of POINT VIEW; thence north�ssterly nlong said line of Lots 4 and 5 and its prolongation thereof to the centerline of S.E. 14th Street; thence southeasterly along said centerline of S.E. 14th Street to a point of intersection with the bmitted existing bulkhead and shoreline of Biscayne Bay; thence meander AU into the Public coin northerly along the existing bulkhead and shoreline of Biscayne Bay torer connection eam with on t point of 4ntersection with the southerly boundary of Claughton Island -1 oG Walter j= oeman ® City Clerk 21 0�1137 Island Bridge to the*errection with the westerly bulkhe�ine of line being art of the Metropolitan Dade Claughton Island, said bulkheadg D County Bulkhead Line as recorded in Plat Book 73 at Page 18 of the • Public Records; thence southerly; easterly, northerly and westerly, following.said existing bulkhead and its westerly prolongation thereof around the -island to the intersection with the mainland on the easterly shoreline of Biscayne Bay; thence meandering in a northwesterly and westerly direction along the shoreline of Biscayne Bay and the Miami River to the intersection with the easterly R/W line of Brickell Avenue Bridge (S.E. 2nd Avenue); thence north along said bridge to the existing bulkhead on the northerly shoreline of the Miami River; said bulk line also being the southerly boundary of the Dupont Plaza Center and Miami Center Joint Venture property; thence northeasterly along the southerly . boundary of Dupont Plaza Center and Miami Center Joint Yenture property to a point of intersection with the easterly property line of Chopin Associates and Miami Center Limited Partnership; said property line being along 'the shoreline of Biscayne Bay; thence northerly along said.. easterlyproperty line of Chopin Associates and Miami Center Limited Partnership property along Biscayne Bay to the southerly property line • of Bayfront Park; thence continuing northerly, northeasterly and northwesterly along the bulkhead line of Bayfront Park and the Bayfront Park Miamarina; thence continuing northerly along the bulkhead line of Biscayne Bay to a point of intersection with the centerline of N.E. 17th Street extended easterly; thence westerly along the centerline of N.E. 17th Street and its extension thereof to the easterly R/W line of the FEC Railroad; thence southerly along the easterly R/W line of the FEC Railroad to the limited access right-of-way of I-395; thence southeasterly and easterly along the limited access right-of*way of I-395 to -the centerline of Biscayne Boulevard; thence southerly along the centerline of Biscayne Boulevard to the centerline of N.E. 5th Street, thence westerly along the centerline and N.E. and N.W. 5th Street to the point of beginning. The above described area contains approximately 839 acres. Submitted into the pubfiC recorg in co€ifleGtion With itCiil on _AZI-LIM—L 9 Walter Feeman • City Clerk, i 22 l - 0®--113@ry . ... ..w11 . d B UL_ - -. l="Trl% Mvff= W= It a rOTL nx.LT a1CIt1a RX M 6ATIOIAL DILLS [! HMMIC PLIM t�i Ila■ss Ilrf �r � . 1. U Il wrr Mown. Wllllw MI 71. IY I. (. 1 ftr•l rwlN■r 1.I I.Iry OtU 3. 30. 11 t+.Iw ...1...•. Ywl a..�..v L. 111 ■. L. 3 lw.r Crl.11 M1.1.. r t' W 11Wr 1.n.�t1 Tom• 1•• 3Ynr 11. 71 f. [. 3 a... IN..r MI1.1 •. Ire .. 101 I1 •r.Iw MIwIr. /,w� 1�. r/pI{ II. ill•10 t. [. 3 11rwa [w■ ar.w. r .rra..-/ {. U� lllurr /..Mw {..I.• a.re �y Ci. 11. a0 t. (. . Io.va /. 4tur C-I 11.. 1. IWI II •a.Iw .r Mww Ir•1•. M1.1.• 7•. 32 1. 1. { 3tw.+ 11lllr M "W CY111. rw. D00 1. NI 1.1la.11 awe Ir•r./1 Y.••1..� a. •I ■• Y. 1 {n. 1•Iwfl •.w o�iwa [. ld 1nr.11 1.r� Ilwl rw...�n.. CY,w. x. la. N. U. a. a I. E. [ . 1r1..r11r 3tawa 1r t-t 1. W [. nwl.. Iowl alr... L rLw 1H 1H./ lln�'t . 10. I3/ 1. nN- lows Illol. I.ww r tO/Olt6 Il. 1/0 S. E. U T- H. Jr. J.Ca... ■fr/'1 r/dp It IM (. nNl•n /owl Of'//4 1H IHq Y11rww 71. .{ [. ■. U I- /rrlr it llrl I2. 161 [.'n NI.. {aw.l ,(1l■ L"r r. W „. IY .. t. I/ ls..n TrIHb l.lrr•1 Ctlr�a r L3.. rl I- WI C- I...a..... I01110■11 r - lttr -it tbwa... tlr ••.� Hlttlnt Mtn 11 Il. .01 r/ I, nrt ..� CMI1. •1W a■[ Ilyy. I1HH 4' 1/. I1n \. rrl ..•� aelra 1.,. lill r'/1 4..I�ri 17. 10011. H! Mr /lw {YUr �. • r/O�6 � - Yllrl 1MItw 1111M f {I. I® 1. Htr .w.r 1�Ir ••I.rw�b 0Q Yt1r1 1•.Ilbn - raw.rtlr M .1I I11111 tr e,[� }+ /J� Submitted ,I 11. IIY 1. t1.r •..... H11..� ■. Ir■rn rw pQ OIa . Clp N Hrl Hlti/Il 11Y /� into the public M. [. E. l..rw It1 r record in connection With C. Ib ■. 1. l awr W1. "'1..9 Ir+ 1A w1. IHN Yr MIHM u. >m ■. [. ! a... v.l. /rl ■Ir1w w r } SI. {OI ■. 1. 1 aw+•_ (Iwar (rlwl l•.n/` [..... �[ Item onIZILy�s� 31. Uil •[1 ■. 1. l t�..aw.r ,� Walter Foeman n. Im ■. [. t lllwl Iwlr ....r I/. ill ■. t. 1 t1lwl Irrr..1... .a ul./ _ t1. 1Sl (. [. 1 111..1 CI} Mt1w..1 1N _ City Clef■\/�( i1n N1M �w /llww M 11.r,r� ■a i�tlrll\ RYIr Mt/ Vv1 ■� Mdllr•Vl�..l N� .lanr.•\ K fnw�w...r WwA G .t.,�< MAP D72 HISTORICAL SITES DOWNTOWN713p"�MASTER PLAN DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT i • 1. Disc" Arcteel"tul Zoee 2. Dyeet Are weIoglul LWO J. Wr14 Trey Caebr Arcmel"lcal Zar 4. Gres*" Arcrasolegtcal ZO. f. /eK 061149 Arcueeloglcel Zow Arcneeleg/cal Zom Submitted into the public r. erlctell Arceseleg/u1 Zone record }in connection /(wi�t�h� 1. 1r1C1811 Fort Areaeel"JC&I Zone item on f. Pr.e.ft+r,ee Ceurct Arceee,plcal Zoew Walter Foeman 10. Swn Daft Arcnrelptcal Zorr City Clerk 11. West Dut AreYel"ic4l Zone s ••••� _••••� ••� ���..� ea e.�+a e.r�r rna vas ra vNse�.w�r rws +r.�eq rn Erww.�.. r,+�w G�s�.s rr MAP D-3 ARCHEOLOGICAL ZONES i DOWNTOWN MASTER PLAN i I DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT 00-113'7 Exhi10 Page • • 40 J� STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS DIVISION OF RESOURCE PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT BUREAU OF LAND AND WATER MANAGEMENT 2571 Executive Canter Circle, EasT Tallahassee, Florida 32301-8244 (904) 488-4925 BLWM-01-65 Subsection 380.06(16), Florida Statutes, places the responsibility on the developer of an approved develooment.ot regional Impact (DRI) for submitting an annual reporr to the local government, the Regional Planning Council the Department of Community Affairs,, and to all affected pernit agencies, on the date specified_ in the Development Order. The failure of a developer'to submit the report on the -date specified in The development order may result In the temporary suspension of the development order by the local government until the annual reoo rr is submitted to the review eaencies.' This reauirement aaolles T, all developments of region:i imoaCT which have been azPrcvea since Aua_usT 6, 1980. If you have any cuesTlons apouT this reouired reoor-r, call rho DRl EnforcemenT CoordlnaTcr sr, (904) 488-4925. Please send the original completed annual report to the desicnaTea local covernmenT official STated in the develoomenT" order with (1) CcZy To each of The followinc a) The regional :lannina agency of jurisdiction: b) All affected permitting aa,�ncies: c) Devision of Resource Plannino and Management Bureau of Land and Water Management 2571 Executive Canter Circle, EasT Tallahassee, Florida 32301 Please format your Annual Status Repo rr after The format example' provided below. ANNUAL STATUS REPORT Reporting Period: to MonTn/Day/Year i, nTrr/Day/Year Development: Name o; DRI Location: ity CounTV Developer:10 Name: L.D:37any Name Address: treeT LOZATlon Submitted into the public record in connection with item F221_' on� Walter Foeman City Clerk Coze 67 �1 Exhi Page*Page BLWM-07-85 _ Page Two 1) Describe any changes made in the proposed plan of development, phasing, or in The reoresenTaTions contained in the Application for Development Approval since the Develo:rnenT of Regional Impact received approval. Please note any actions (substantial determinations) taken by local governmenT to address these changes. Note: If a response Is to be more than one sentence, attach as Exhibit 'A' a detailed description of each chance and copies of The modified site plan.drawings. Exhibit 'A',snould also address the following additional items If apolicaole. a) .Describe chances in the plan of development or phasing for the reporting year and for the subsequent years: b) State any known incremental DRI ap_11cations for develoomenT aoorrval or recuesTs for a suosTanTlal deviation eeterminet Ion ThaT were flied in the reporting • year and To be filed daring the nexT year: c) ATtacn a copy cf any notice of the adccTIon ct-a develoomenT order or The �ubseauenT modificaTlon of an adcoted development order ThaT was recorded by The _ developer pursuant Tc Sutsection 3°0.05(14)(d), F.S. 2) Has There been a chance in local eovernment jurlsdiction for qny portion of The develoomenT since the developmenT order wes issued? it so, has The annexing local eovernment adcotea a new DeveloomenT of Regional Imoact development order for The Project? Please provide a copy of the order adootod by the annexino local covernmenT. ,any 3) Provide copies of revised nester plans, incremental site plans, etc., not previously sutmitted. , Note: If a res.^Ouse is To be more Than one or two sentences, attach as Exhibit 4) Provide a summary comparison of development activity proposed and ac,uaIIy conducted for the reporting year. Examole: Number of dwelllno units constructed, site imorovt— Slib ments, lots sold, acres mined, gross floor area constructed, mltte d Into the p u bile barrels of storage caopcity cemaleted, permits obTainea, etc. recur jr) onnection Note: If a resDcnse is to be more Than one sentence, attach asltem with � on >'-f& ((�j !moo — Exhibit IV. Walter Foeman 5) Have env undeveloped tra_Ts of land in The develoomenT City Clerk (other Ttan individual sinole-fa7ily IcTs) been s;.td To e seoa"LTe enTity or oevel::er? If so, i�enTify Traci, its size, tna The :uyer. Please :rovide mess which snow The Tra:-S involve:. iracT cLyer Q a� 68 00-1137 • • 49 ELWM-07-85 Page Three Note: If a response Is to be more than one sentence, attach as Exhibit 101. 6) Describe any lands purchased or optioned adjacent to the original Development of Regional Impact site subseauenT to Issuance of the development order. Identify such land, its size, . and Intended use on a site plan and map. Note: If a response is,to be more than one sentence, attach as Exhibit 'E'/ 7) List any substantial local, state, and federal permits which have been obtained, applied for, or denied, during this repo rt•ing period. Specify The agency, type of permit, and duty for-eacn. Note: If a response is To be�more Than one sentence, attach as Exhibit 'F'. 8) Assess the development's and local governmenT;s' continuing compliance with any conditions of aporoval containea in The DRI developmenT order. Note: Attach as Exhibit 'G'.. (See attached form) 9) Provide any information that is spec)fically reauired by the DevelopmenT Order To be included In the annual report. 10) Provide a state -tent cerTlfyIng that all persons have been sent cozies o' the annual reoorr In conformance with SubsecTlons 380.06(14) and (16), F.S. Person co-oletInc the -questionnaire: Title: Representing: Submitted into the recordin connect o witpublic item on h Waiter Foeman City C/eac 0®-1137 69 IMWV 10 PR 328 u:,R 390433 J-86-531 e.130794956 10/7/86 J1 1 A RESOLUTION AMENDING A DEVELOPMENT ORDER (RESOLUTION 79-396; MAY 24, 1979. AS ;C << AMENDED) FOR THE MIAMI CENTER I PROJECT. A DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT. PROPOSED BY MIA141 CENTER JOINT VENTURE. AND LOCATED AT �IL �; �,, r APPROXIMATELY 100 CHOPIN PLAZA AND APPROXIMATELY 201-399 S. BISCAYNE BOULEVARD BEING TRACT D. DUPONT PLAZA (50-11); �t�-- INCORPORATING THE APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND THE REPORT AM RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE SOUTH FLORIDA REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL; MAKING FINDINGS. 4, r APPROVING SAID PROJECT SUBJECT TO THE I MODIFICATIONS TO THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER PERTAINING TO THE ENTIRE SITE; FURTHER. -�% 1✓. ADDING CONDITIONS PERTAINING ONLY TO THE l SOUTHERN 3.01 ACRES OF THE SUBJECT SITE KNOWN AS "ONE DUPONT PLAZA" (FCRMERLY KNOWN AS 'BISCAYNE PLAZA') PHASES I AND 2 AND APPROVING WITH CONDITIONS THE SOUTHERN PORTION OF THE SUBJECT PROJECT KNOWN AS ONE DUPONT PLAZA PHASES 1 AND 2; FURTHER, DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO RECORD. AND SEND COPIES OF THE HEREIN RESOLUTION AND DEVELOPMENT ORDER TO AFFECTED AGENCIES AND THE DEVELOPER. WHEREAS. the Miami Planning Advisory Boera, at its meeting held on May 16, 1979. Item sl, following an advertised hearing, adopted Resolution No. PAB-23- 79 by a 7 to 0 vote 0 member absent), recommending approval of the Development Order for the Ball Point Project, (AKA Miami Center I project), a Development of Regional Impact; and WHEREAS, Holywell Corporation proposed the undertaking of the Ball Point Project (AKA Miami Center I project) a Development of Regional Impact, at e defined by Chapter 22F-2, Rules of the State of Florida Department of Administration. located within the City of Miami, ow a tract of land containing approximately 8.46 acres located on the North bank at the mouth of the Miami River. comprised of 928,200 square feet of gross office space; 630 hotel units in a structure containing 550.000 square feet of gross hotel fi a� space; SOO dwelling units in two towers containing 865.700 square feet of I. is gross residential space; 75.000 square feet of gross space for retail use; and 2.565 parking spaces; and WHEREAS, Holywell Corporation submitted a complete Application for Development Approval for a Development of Regional Impact to the South Florida Submitted into :the public JaETINQcr . reco d in onnection with OCT 9 us itirrn� on _l2—=/`J Walter Foeman � _ c L ,W U O LL d.. U co C: O O U O .1 �7 1y! a.. V �D Q0-1137 af,.att. 13079 C4957 Regional Planning Council pursuant to Chapter 380.06 Florida Statutes, and did receive a favorable recommendation for a proposed development order on May 7, 1979, as set forth in the Report and Recommendations of the South Florida Regional Planning Council; and WHEREAS, the Application for Development Approval, as reviewed by the South Florida Regional Planning Council, referred to an offics building with 928,200 square feet of gross office space; a hotel structure with SSO,000 gross square feet, two condominium towers with 865,700 gross square feet and a parting structure with 2,560 parking spaces; and WHEREAS, Holywell Corporation complied with all the requirements set forth in Ordinance No. 8290 by appearing before the City of Miami Planning Advisory Board; and WHEREAS, the City Commission considered the Report and Recommendations of V w � May 7. C1 the Soutr. Florida Regional Planning Council dated 1979 and each element 0 Q. W i` required to be considered by Chapter 380.06 Florida Statutes; and `ti Ll U WHEREAS, the Ball Point Project, as originally proposed by the Holywell ;� 0 a Corporation to 1979. complied with the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan, O Cz was consistent with the orderly development and goals of the City of Miami. C O C.) and complied with local and development regulations, being then the V C Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance No. 6811; and WHEREAS, the Ball Point Project did not unreasonably interfere with the U E achievement of the objectives of the adopted State Land Development Plan CO applicable to the City of Miami; and WHEREAS, the Ball Point Project was consistent with the Report and Recommendations of the South Florida Regional Planning Council and did not unreasonably interfere with any of the considerations and objectives set forth W' in Chapter 380, Florida Statutes; and V WHEREAS, the Miami Zoning Board, on May 21. 1979. granted a variance from Gp Lp the 300 foot height limit and granted Conditional Use approval for parting (V U uses as allowed in Ordinance No. 6871. the then -Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance W 3 Ce C_ crJ W for the City of Miami; and O U WHEREAS, the City Commission determined that all requirements of al publication and other legal requirements for the issuance of the proposed Development Order had been complied with; and WHEREAS, the City Commission deemed It advisable and in the best interest of the general welfare of the City of Miami to issue a Development Order for 3'7 I«:13QT9Pc4958 the Ball Point project (AKA Miami Center 1 project) a Development of Regional Impact; and �j WHEREAS, the Miami City Commission, by Resolution 79-396; May 24. 1979. issued a Development Order, attached hereto as Exhibit W. approving with modifications. the Ball Point Project (AKA Miami Center I project) a Development of Regional Impact. as proposed by HolywvII Corporation for Tract D. DiJPOMT PLAZA (50-11). which project was limited to 928,200 square feet of gross office space; 630 hotel units in a structure containing SSO.000 square feet of gross hotel space; 600 dwelling units in two towers containing 865.700 square feet of residential space; 75,000 square feet of gross retail use and 2.565 parking spaces; and Iry WHEREAS. the MIasi City Commission by Resolution 80-707; September 25. 1980. amended the Development Order (Resolution 79-396; May 24. 19791 by amending paragraph 7 of Exhibit 'A' to provide that the Holywell Corporation reach agreement on interim traffic improvements prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy rather than prior to issuance of a building permit and. further finding that this amendment did not constitute a substantial deviation from the terms of the Oevelopment Order (Resolution 79-396; May 24, i 1979). and WHEREAS, the development on the north area of the site described in Exhibit 'E'. ('Miami Center Existing') has been largely completed; and a Certificate of Occupancy has been issued, subject to a restrictive Covenant addressing remining conditions in the Development Order; and WHEREAS, the Miami Center Joint Venture ('Applicant'). successors in interest to the Holywel) Corporation, had-p-r- d amending the Development Order to change the development allowed on the southern 3.61 acres of the site (more particularly described on Exhibit "fattached hereto and now known as 'One Dupont Plaza'); claiming that such amendment did not Constitute a substantive deviation; and WHEREAS. the Miami Planning Advisory Board. on February 6, 1965, by a 6 to 0 vote recommended that the amendments constituted substantial deviations to be referred to the South Florida Regional Planning Council; and ji WHEREAS. Mr. Frank Callahan, Chainun. South Florida Regional Planning i; Council. in a letter to then Mimi Mayor Maurice Ferro, dated February 21, 1985. stated that the proposed amendments constituted a substantial deviation according to Chapter 380.06(17) F.S.; that the Council would appeal any -3- O 00-s1137 "'c: 1-1079 A959 decision of the City.to the contrary, and urged the applicant to submit an amended Application for Cevelopment approval to the Council and City; and WHEREAS. an Mach 26. 1905, in pubic hearing before the Miami City Commission. the applicant withdrew the item; and WHEREAS, pursuent to Chapter 300.06 (17)(6) F.S. (1963) the amendments Proposed by the applicant constituted a substantial deviation from terns of the previously issued Development Order; and WHEREAS. Applicant has submitted an amended Application for Development Approval fob Development of Regional Impact for the entire 8.46 acre site of the Miami Center I project on July 11. 1985. more particularly described in Exhibit '0' attached hereto. to the South Florida Regional Planning Council pursuant to Chapter 380.06 F.S. Said application requests changes on only the One Dupont Plata project site by.deleting the previously approved two towers comprising SOO dwel l inq units of 865.700 square feet of gross residentia l building area and 1,220 parting spaces and substituting the following therefor; two mixed use towers comprising ISO drelting units of 300.000 gross square feet and 220.000 gross square feet of coamerctal use; ).480.000 gross ,-7 square feet of office use and retaining 1200 parting spaces. altogether comprising 2.600,000 gross square feet; and WHEREAS, the South Florida Pei; hl planning Council. an February 3, 1966. recommended aps royal. with conditions, of the proposed revised project 'One Dupont Flata'. as set forth in the Report and Recommendations of the putA Florida Regional planning Council, dated February e. 1986; attached as Exhibit "C' and made a part hereof; and WHEREAS. Applicant has complied with all the requirements set forth in Ordinance 9SOO. as amended. the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami I perUtniag to the southern 3.01 acres of the site; and WHEREAS. the City Commission has considered the Report and Recommendations of the South Florida Regional Planning Council dated February d. 1966 and math element required to be considered by Chapter 380.06 F.S.; and WHEREAS. the One Dupont Plata project complies with the City of Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan. is consistent with the orderly development of the City of Miami, and compl its. as to the northerly S.45 acres of the site known as 'Miami Center Existing' (Exhibit 'E'). with local and land development regulations and complies, as to the southerly 3.01 acres of the site known as 'One Dupont Plata' (Exhibit 'F'). Phases 1 and 2. with local land development regulations; and -a- v s C _ •+ E U C L C lL CD O ` U �_. ct1 C O O j V C o"n+ E 00 0 1 3 7 WHEREAS, One Oupant Plaza does not unrtasbnabiv M terfere with the achievemennt of the oujectives of the adopted State Land Development flan applicable to the City of Miami; and WHEREAS, the One Dupont Plata is consistent with the Report and C§ hecommeneationt of the South Florida Regional Planning Council (February 4. f` 5?1986) and does not unreasonably interfere with any of the considerations and tobjectives set forth in Chapter 380 F.S.; and MW WHEREAS, the Miami Zoning Board, at its meeting of June 2, 1986. Item 3 following an advertised hearing, adopted Resolution Z8 58-86 by a 9 to 0 / vote, granting a variance, with conditions. from Section 2023. Zoning Ordinance 9500, to provide 3 of 10 required off-street loading stalls 12' A yy 35' x IS' and 6 of 8 required off street loading stalls 12' x SS' x IS% and WHEREAS. the Miami Planning Advisory Board, at its meeting of June 18. 1986. Item 1, following an advertised hearing. adopted Resolution PAB 20-86 by a 9 to 0 vote, recoemiending approval, with modifications, of the amended Development Order for the Miami Center I project; and WHEREAS. the City Commission, At its meeting of June 26, 1966. Item PZ-13 passed Motion 86-520 which continued the item to 1:30 pm. September 2S. 1986. subject to the applicant's acceptance of ten minimum requirements as outlined by the Planning Department; failing which the applicant would not be required to appear; and WHEREAS, the City Commission has determined that all requirements of publication and other legal requirements for the issuance of the Development Order have been complied with; and WHEREAS, the City Commission deems it advisable and in the best interests of the general welfare of the City of Miami to approve an amended Oevelopment Order for the Miami Center I project, a Development of Regional Impact as hereinafter set forth; NOW. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI. FLORIDA: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Section 1. The following findings of frct and conclusion Of law art made with respect to the project: a, The City Commission hereby determines that One Dupont Plata is In conformity with the adopted Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan. b, The City Commission hereby determines that One Dupont Plane is in accord with the zoning district classifications of Zoning Ordinance 9500. c. The City Commission hereby finds that One Dupont Plaza would not have an adverse impact on soils, animal lift. or vegetation and 5- 65 � 1101 "t:13079tc4%1 further finds that it would have a number of positive impacts inc uamg: 1. Up to 2.500 permanent new jobs would be generated by the One Dupont Plaza project. and. as a result, nearly 2.900 additional full -tine jobs could be created in South O'nrida. with a $108 Million increase in total wages and $184 million in value added to the regional economy. 2. A net positive fiscal impact of $8.1 million would be created by the one Dupont Plaza project. 3. A reduction in the growth of regional energy consumption would result from the energy efficient conservation measures proposed by the Applicant. d. The City Commission hereby finds that One Dupont Plaza would have a number of adverse impacts which result from the normal course of development or can be potentially mitigated by the applicant through the Conditions in the Development Order; as follows: 1. increase annual energy use within the Region by the equivalent of nearly 6.7 million gallons of fuel oil. 2. Increase the amount and number of hazardous wastes generated on- s 1 to. 3. Place additional unfunded demands upon police. emergency rescue. and fire services. S. Generate 2.464 AM and 2.250 PM peak -hour vehicle (Miami Center existing and One Dupont Plaza) an the regional roadway network and. along with other development traffic. reduce levels of service on segments of the regional roadway network. Section 2. A Development Order. emending Resolutions 79-396; May 24. 1979. as amended by Resolution 80-707; September 2S. 1960; being the Developt Order for the 801 Point Project. ARA Miami Center I Project. a Development of Regional Impact. proposed by Ethan Minsky. as agent for Miame' Center Joint Venture ('Applicant'). for Tract 0. DU POUT PLAZA (SO-111 P.R.O.C. is___htra0y-.approved with conditions. and granted and issued iw two parts: Exhibit 'A' attached hereto and made a part of this Resolution. pertaining to the entire 6.46 acres of Miami Center I (more particularly -6. H V5.. C 1LC E N U a C C.\\A L a`�_�U °CU 9: RI 0 E Q) 00-1137 C�� \,X 00-1137 Submitted into the public recoro, in connection wi h Item on 1�d Walter Foeman City Clerk Ott-1137 Submitted into the public lcor in connection with item. on 2 Walter Foeman City Clerk 40-1137 i ' r 1 1 a� IV 1=m —..: _:Wc _ _.tom-•. - _ 1�':i t� f�1j,� : • a'' • 12-13-2000 4.:50PM FROM BRUCE LAZAR 305 673 8865 December 13, 2000 Carlos Gimenez, City Manager City of Miami 444 S.W. 2nd Ave. 1 Ot FL Miami, FL 33.130 RE: Major Use Special Permit for Miami One, 205 South Biscayne Blvd - Dear Mr. Gimenez: The undersigned is Executive Vice President of Leisure Property Investments, Inc., the contract purchaser of the Dupont Plaza Hotel property. We understand that the developers of the above project are requesting an amendment to a prior approved major use special permit for the above project and that matter comes before the commission on December 14, 2000- Unfortunately, I will be out of the city at that time and cannot appear personally to lend our support to the application. Accordingly, please consider this letter as confirmation of our wholehearted support of the project. Thank you for you consideration. cerely, race E. Lazar xecutive Vice Pr i nt Leisure Property In stments, Inc. Submitted into the public record in connection with _item on _4�,. Walter Foeman City Clerk 2901 Collins Avenue Miami Beach, FL 33140 ®®� � � � rj ' Tel: (305) 672-LION (546G) Fax: (305) 673-1592 Prepared by: Hotel Consulting International(HCI) 2665 South Bayshore Drive Suite 600, Grand Bay Plaza Miami, Florida 33133 Submitted to: Ms. Lillian Butchart-Lividini Inter -Continental Hotel Executive Offices, 3 rd.Floor 100 Chopin Plaza Miami, FL 33131 r"O'Dorci in isCinnf"Crfo i itwn _ on lister Foefrt C4 C16rk 00-113 Inter -Continental Hotel, Miami, Florida Executive Summary 1 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Ms. Lillian Butchart-Lividini Inter -Continental Hotel Executive Offices, 3 rd. Floor 100 Chopin Plaza Miami, FL 33131 To Whom It May Concern: December 11, 2000 Submitted into the public recorojin connection with item r- on Lam// !Walter Foeman Re: Impact Analysis City Clerk `One Miami as proposed' Development on the Inter -Continental Hotel Miami, Florida Pursuant to your request, we have performed an impact analysis to deter- mine the impact of the `One Miami as proposed ' Development on the In- ter -Continental Hotel. The proposed commercial/residential development is scheduled to begin construction approximately one year from the current date and construction time is estimated at 28 months. Therefore our as- sumed construction commencement date is December 1, 2001 and date of completion is April 1, 2004. As requested, we have estimated the potential impact in terms of occupancy, average rate, room revenue, net income and subsequent market real estate value. We have reviewed an Economic Impact Analysis of Benefits Summary Document prepared by Sharpton, Brunson & Company. This analysis ex- amines positive economic and tax- benefits analysis but does not adjust for negative economic impact on the Inter -Continental Hotel and decline in real estate value and subsequent reduction in property tax. We have assumed that a commercial/residential development will take place and that there will be positive synergies and impact generated by this and other new development in the area. In addition our analysis considers that the market area will also experience an increase in quality hotel room inventory due to new supply and renovations that will also impact the Inter - Continental. Hotel. This analysis pertains to the net impact sustained by the Inter -Continental Hotel because of the unfavorable design and configura- tion that is currently proposed. We conclude that the development as proposed would be detrimental to the Inter -Continental as the views will become inferior and the massive elongated residential tower will cast a great shadow over the pool and limit its desirability. A reconfiguration of the building, to allow for partial views Hotel Consulting International (HCI) • Phone 305.856.7560 • Fax 305-856.5934 # http://www.HotelConstiltinj ." Inter -Continental Hotel, Miami, Florida Executive Summary 2 and sunlight should significantly diminish impact. We have concluded that the hotel will loose between 1 and 2 occupancy points because of the nega- tive impact on the pool and sundeck use. With a great shadow much of the day the pool and sundeck will become less valuable to the hotel as an amen- ity. We also estimate that 1/3 of the guestrooms will post rates that are more comparable to `city view' rates which are lower because they do not enjoy a water view. The rates ranges from $10430 less and we estimate that on average the 213 rooms impacted will on average earn average rates that are $15 less. We have further calculated via a discounted cash -flow analysis that these two factors alone negatively impact the hotel's real estate value by $11.2 million. Such a value adjustment should also trigger an appeal for a reduction in property taxes. This letter summarizes our analysis and conclusions. ❑ The Inter -Continental Hotel is the city's premier hotel and is located at 100 Chopin Plaza. The 639-room hotel features two restaurants, two lounges and 62,500 sq ft of meeting and banquet space. Guest ameni- ties include an outdoor heated swimming pool with expansive sundeck, 6,000-q ft. fitness center/health spa, a 1/4 mile outdoor jogging track and a rooftop garden. The rooftop pool, garden, restaurant and track are a unique amenity for a city hotel. ❑ The hotel is currently undergoing a $30 million renovation in order to compete more effectively in a market that has substantial new inventory of first class hotel rooms either open or in the pipeline. ❑ The 35-story Inter -Continental structure is triangular shaped with an approximate equal number of guestrooms facing the Port of Miami, Bis- cayne Bay and The City. The building currently features commanding views in three directions north (Port View), west (City View) and south (Bay View). ❑ The `One Miami as proposed ' development site is a 3.04-acre parcel lo- cated at 205 South Biscayne Blvd. that abuts the Inter -Continental Ho- tel. The development includes a 49-story, 425-unit (626,552 sq ft) resi- dential tower and a 34-story (707,025 gross sq. ft.) office tower. The residential tower is located on the east side of the site and is connected to a 13-story, 1,834 space garage structure. ❑ The elongated residential tower, as proposed, will block the Inter Con- tinental's view of Miami River and Biscayne Bay. The new tower will be much taller and wider than the Inter -Continental Hotel structure. About 1/3 of its rooms or 213 guestrooms, will be negatively impacted as the rooms will categorized as without water view and therefore com- mand lower rates. Submitted into the public recor in connection with item / on Walter Foeman Hotel Consulting International (HCI) C Phone 305_856_7560 Fax 305.85665934 http://www.HotelConsulting.net Ci .-113 Inter -Continental Hotel, Miami, Florida Executive Summary 3 i ❑ In addition, the large parking structure will also partially block views and in addition will be a less attractive view from the impacted guest - rooms. ❑ The Inter -Continental will be negatively impacted both ,upon comple- tion and during construction in terms of number of room nights ac- commodated and the attainable average room rates. ❑ The desirability of the pool area and use of the sundeck will also be greatly diminished, as the proposed elongated structure will cast a large shadow over the pool area for most of the day. This will be a significant disadvantage for leisure and airline crew business. But other segments will also consider the change as an overall negative. ❑ In the hotel industry, as in other real estate uses, room rate structures vary not only by season but also by desirability of views that are afforded from guestrooms. The table S-1 titled Published Rom Rates and Esti- mated Room Rate Impact summarizes the current quoted room rates by room category and by respective views. As the rates indicate the highest premium are for views to the north overlooking Miami Port and Bis- cayne Bay. The second highest premiums are for rooms with water views to the south overlooking Biscayne Bay and the Miami River. This view will be severely impacted by `One Miami' development, if developed as currently configured. With a redesign large partial water views should be possible and impact would be greatly diminished. ❑ The table S 1 illustrates that non water -view rooms are quoted at $10-to P0 less than rooms that enjoy water -views. We have conservatively esti- mated the average room rate loss factor will be around $15 per occupied room in current dollars for the 213 rooms. This equates to an average of $5 average room rate loss factor for the 639-room hotel. ❑ Table S-2 titled Adjustment to Rate for Inflation illustrates the adjusted projected average rate differential based on an inflation rate of 3%. The average rate loss for the impacted hotel rooms ranges from $15.26 to $17.17 that equates to $5.09 to $5.72 for the 639-room hotel. ❑ Table S-3 titled Impact on Revenue and Net Income (Before Fixed 3 C Charges) calculates the total revenue and net income loss specifically _a) oU due to a decline in average room rate for the impacted rooms. The de- ` v cline represents a net loss as revenue flows entirely to the Net Income -y (�. v (before Fixed Charges) line, as expenses have already been deducted. C o ❑ Table S-4 titled Occupancy, Revenue and Net; Income Impact (Before v� Fixed Charges) considers our estimate of a 1 to 2 occupancy points lost S due to a) limited desirability of the pool/sundeck area because of the great shadow and b) preference for other hotels due to the overwhelm- 0 ing density and obstruction of natural views. Leisure and airline crew 42 •2 guests will be particularly sensitive to pool environment, sunbathing fa- cilities and views from the hotel. However, other segments will also view the changes as a negative. The decline in occupied rooms shoo 00.1131 Hotel Consulting International (HCI) 0 Phone 305-856-7560 • Fax 305.856-5934 • http://www.HotelConsulting.net Inter -Continental Hotel, Miami, Florida Executive Summary 4 range from 6 to 13 room nights per day. In estimating the Net Income Impact (Before Fixed Charges) we have applied achieved historical ex- pense ratios to revenues for a net income calculation. ❑ Table S-5 presents the cash flows of negative impact over a ten year pe- riod for a) the average room rate loss and b) occupancy points loss. In addition we have concluded with a valuation of the cash flow using an appropriate discount rate for such a hotel. This method is typically used in the valuation of hotels and may also be used to calculate an adjust- ment factor to value due to changes in cash flows, as exhibited in the case of the Inter -Continental Hotel. ❑ Our analysis has specifically quantified impact due to a) the average room rate loss and b) occupancy point loss, as these factors are relatively easy to quantify. We anticipate that economic impact will also be sus- tained in other areas that have not been quantified. The Blue Water Restaurant, which is located in the pool area; it will be impacted as its views will be diminished and pool use will decline. Banqueting and so- cial event organizers may consider that the pool area ambiance is less suitable for staging events. Also other sectors of demand will lower their perception of the subject hotel, as this part of the hotel will be less attractive than previously. The impact will be more severe as the hotel will be competing with newer more luxurious hotels. In addition due to the immense scale of the development greatly increased traffic conges- tion in the area of the Inter -Continental may also be a major economic on the hotel during construction and upon completion. The following table presents actual quoted rates and an estimate of Average rooms rate Loss sustained by the Inter -Continental Table S-1 Published Rom Rates and Estimated Room Rate Impact 00-1137 Hotel Consulting International (HCI) 4 Phone 305-856.7560 4 Fax 305-856-5934 • littp://www.HotelConsultiiig.iiet Inter -Continental Hotel, Miami, Florida Executive Summary 5 The table summarizes the current quoted room rates by room category and by respective views. As the rates indicate the highest premium are for views facing north overlooking Miami Port and Biscayne Bay. The table concludes with an estimate of published rate Impact of $10 to $30 and estimate of average rate impact of $15. The following tableS-2 presents our calculation for adjustment to average room rate for inflation to December 1, 2001, the date of construction commence- ment and April 1, 2004 the assumed date of `One Miami' completion. Table S2 Adjustment to Rate for Inflation Year Base ADR ($) Increase N Adjusted ADR ($) 2000/01 15.00 2001/02 3.0 15.26 2002/03 3.0 15.72 2003/04 3.0 16.19 2004/05 3.0 16.67 2005/06 3.0 17.17 This table illustrates the adjusted projected average rate differential based on an inflation rate of 3%. The average rate loss for the impacted rooms ranges from $16.39 to $17.39 that equates to $5.46 to $5.80 for the639-room hotel. Table S-3 titled Impact on Revenue and Net Income (Before Fixed Charges) calculates the total revenue and net income loss due only to the average room rate impact. The decline in revenue flows entirely to the Net Income (before Fixed Charges) line. Also presented is income loss per $5 of impact, which ranges from $286,000 t $295,000. ,c J �� s, `000 Table S3 Impact on Revenue and Net Income (Before Fixed charges) w 4 , a� m Fiscal Yeart 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 2004/5 2005.06 a V No. of Rooms Impacted 213 213 213 213 1 213 Number of Available rooms Impacted 77,745 77,745 77,745 77,745 77,745 43/ Number of Occupied Rooms Impacted 57,298 58,076 58,076 58,697 58,931 p� Impact Per Occupied Room $15.26 $15.72 $16.19 $16.67 $17.17 J QQ[��y TOTAL$ TOTAL$ TOTAL$ TOTAL$ TOTAL$ C REVENUEIMPACT'000 Rooms Revenue $874 $913 $940 $979 $1,012 NET INCOME (Before Fixed Charges) $874 $913 $940 1 $979 $1,012 Hotel Consulting International (HCI) • Phone 305-856-7560 • Fax 305-856-5934 • http-//www.HotelConsulting.net --- ---- - - ----- --- - -.-... ----- - --- -- 00-1137 Inter -Continental Hotel, Miami, Florida Executive Summary 6 The following table titled Occupancy, Revenue and Net Income Impact con- siders our estimate of a 1 to 2 occupancy points lost due to a) limited desirabil- ity of the pool/sundeck area because of the great shadow and b) preference for other hotels due to the overwhelming density and obstruction of natural. Table S-4 Projection of Occupancy, Revenue and Net Income impact (Before Fixed Charges) `000 a-Ld �. a c oLL U U The following table summarizes the cash flows of negative impact over a ten o c3 year period for a) the average room rate loss and b) occupancy points loss. In addition we have concluded with a valuation of impact at an appropriate dis- a> . count rate. This valuation quantifies the decline in value on the real estate in- terest of the Inter -Continental Hotel. A discount factor of 13.75% has been o utilized in conjunction with a terminal capitalization rate of 10.5% to arrive at a� a present value of the negative cash flows. Table S-5 Discounted Cash Flow Analysis of Impact 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 A.wmpe R.te Net In—lmpect(i000) $874 $913 $940 $979 $1,012 $1,042 $1,074 $1,106 $1,139 $1,173 0F.,,o,v Not Income 1mp.a(•000) $502 $522 $280 $289 $297 $306 $315 $325 $334 $345 i. �ps Net Income lmpaa(.000) $1,377 $1,435 $1,221 $1,267 $1,309 $1,349. $1,389 $1,431 $1,474 $16,I10 I)i.—..t F.etoc.e 13.75% 0.879120879 0,77285352 0.679431666 0.597302564 0.525101155 0, 46162738V 0.405826276 0.356770352 0.313644266 0.275731223 I is—ted Cash Flow(.000) $1,210 $1,109 $829 $757 $688 $623� $564 $510 $462 $4,442 ,D........ value of F.—Benefit. $11,194,294 1Ith-Yea: Net 1.—(•000) $1,5o3 Rounded) $11,200,000 C pimliatian Rue 10.5% I', Room (Impacted R—) $53,000 Total Sale. Proceeds (•000) $14,890 Las: Btokm p 6, Lepl R. at 2.0% (•000) $298 Net S.I. Ptoceeds(•000) $14,592 1 Oth-Year Na Income (+000) $1,518 tOth.Year Cash Flows (•000) $16,110 1e 305-856-7560 4 Fax 305-856-5934 4 http://www.HotelConsulting.net 00-1137 Inter -Continental Hotel, Miami, Florida 0 0 Executive Summary 7 We conclude that the development as proposed would be detrimental to the Inter -Continental as the views will become inferior and the massive elongated residential tower will cast a great shadow over the pool and limit its desirability. A reconfiguration of the building, to allow for partial views and sunlight should significantly diminish impact. We have concluded that the hotel will loose between 1 and 2 occupancy points because of the nega- tive impact on the pool and sundeck use. With a great shadow much of the day the pool and sundeck will become less valuable to the hotel as an amen- ity. We also estimate that 1/3 of the guestrooms will post rates that are more comparable to `city view' rates which are lower because they do not enjoy a water view. The rates ranges from $10-$30 less and we estimate that on average the 213 rooms impacted will on average earn average rates that are $15 less. We have further calculated via a discounted cash -flow analysis that these two factors alone negatively impact the hotel's real estate value by $11.2 million. Such a value adjustment should also trigger an appeal for a reduction in property taxes. Submitted into the public record in _!c-,�onnection with item c'� on 121-1--Un—i Walter Foeman City Clerk; Hotel Consulting International (HCI) • Phone 305-856-7560 • Fax 305.856-5934 • http://www.HotelConsulting.net 00-1137 7 Submitted into the public record in connection with item ? L; on 14.4-0a THomm F. O' EILL, CRE, MAI, ISHC, CHA Walter Foeman EXPERTISE Hotel/Resort Appraisals, Market & Feasibility Studies, Valuations • Site Selection & Development Consulting -Asset Management • Operation Reviews • Hotel Franchise & Management Company Selection Negotiations • Impact Analysis • Repositioning Studies • Litigation Support, ExpertTestimony • Hotel Transactions • Privatization PAST EXPERIENCE Managing Director Hotel Consulting International (HCI), (Div. of O & R Valuation Services, Inc.), Miami, FL (1998) Managing Director, HVS International (Miami), (Div. of O & R Valuation Services, Inc.), Miami, FL (1992-1997) Sr. Vice President, Hospitality Valuation Services, (Div. of Hotel Appraisals, Inc.), Mineola, NY (1986.1992) Managing Director, Rose Hill Hotel, Ltd., Kilkenny City, Ireland (Owned, Developed and Operated Hotel and Restaurants) (1975.1985) Restaurants Manager, Grand Hotel, Anaheim, CA (1974) Grossinger's Hotel, Liberty, NY (1973) Bahnhof Buffets, Basel, Switzerland (1971-1972) EDUCATION BS Equivalent - Shannon International College of Hotel Management Master of Science Degree, New York University- Real Estate Development and Investment Hotel Management Training Program Honors Certificate - Switzerland New York University, School of Continuing Education, Real Estate Division - Department of Graduate Studies APPRAISAL INSTITUTE COURSES MAI designation requirements Course 1A1 - Real Estate Appraisal Principles Course IA2 - Basic Valuation Procedures Standards of Professional Practice, Part A (USPAP) Course 23/8/3 - Standards of Professional Practice, Part B Course 1BA - Capitalization Theory and Techniques, Part A Course 1BB - Capitalization Theory and Techniques, Part B Course 2.1 - Case Studies in Real Estate Valuation Course 2.2 - Report Writing and Valuation Analysis Hotel Valuation -Investment Seminar Special Purpose Properties Demonstration Appraisal Report Valuing Your Business Public Market for Real Estate The Luxury Waterfront Market & Determination of Land Values Eco-lodge Planning & Sustainable Design (not MAI course) CONFERENCES &. LECTURES COTELCO (Asociaci6n Hotelera de Colombia), Hotel Industry Conference, San Andreas, Colombia, Speaker, 1994 U.S./Latin American Resort Development Conference, Costa Rica, 1995, 1996 Feasibility of Resort Development Preferred® Hotels & Resorts Worldwide Meeting, Orlando, FL, 1996 - Speaker on the State of the Hotel Industry Hotel Development & Valuation, Overseas Private Investment Corporation (OPIC), Washington, D.C., 1996 PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS Counselors of Real Estate (CRE) Appraisal Institute - Member (MAI) International Society of Hospitality Consultants (ISHC) American Hotel & Motel Association - Certified Hotel Administrator (CHA) Licensed Real Estate Appraiser - Florida & Georgia Licensed Real Estate Broker - Florida Licensed Mortgage Broker - Florida National Association of Realtors Urban Land Institute LITIGATION SUPPORT Lake Park Inn, Lake Park, Florida • Balhalla Hotel, Toledo, Ohio • Lord Baltimore, Baltimore, Maryland • Proposed Hotel, Ft. Myers, Florida • Radisson on the Lake, Ypsilanti, Michigan • Hyatt Regency, Miami, Florida • Days Inn, Miami, Florida • La Concha Hotel, Key West, Florida • Embassy Suites Jamaican Court, Orlando APPEARANCE S AN EXPERT WITNESS U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Eastern District of Michigan, Southern Division 1993 • U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of Florida, 1993 - 1994 • U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of Florida, 1996 - U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Florida, Orlando Division, 1996 HCI Hotel Consulting International • Phone 305-856-7560 • Fax 305-856.5934 • htti)://www.HotelConsultiny.net Q-01 00-1137 1 REFRESENTATivE LIST OF CLIENTS SERVED Aetna Real Estate Investments Collateral Mortgage Ltd. AIRCOA Column Financial Inc. Alfa Insurance Companies Connor/Jacobsen Hotels American Bankers Insurance Cooper Company American Savings Bank FSB Corporacion Financiera del Norte, Colombia America's Best Inns, Inc. Corporation Grana y Montero Amsouth Bank Corporex Corporation Amway Hotel Corporation Credit Lyonnais Antunez and Associates, Inc. Credit Suisse First Boston Arbor National Commercial Mortgage CreditVest, Inc. Avista Properties Dahlawi Holding Corporation Aztec Group Daiwa Bank, Ltd. Bank of Nova Scotia Dan Hotels Corporation, Inc. Bank of Scotland DBS Bank Bank of Tokyo - Mitsubishi Delta Associates Bank of Tokyo Trust Company Desarrollos Inmobiliarios S.A. Bank One Diamond on the Beach, Inc. Banker's Trust Company Disposition Associates (HAMDA) Barcelo Hotels DJK Properties, Inc. Barnett Banks, Inc. Doubletree BDO Stern Cia. Ltda. Embassy Suites Beck Summit Hotel Management Group Ernst & Young Belize Hotel Developments Ltd. Euram Management, Inc. Ben Franklin Properties FDIC Best Inns, Inc. Federal Deposit insurance Corp. Best Western Fiduciaria Carceres y Ferro S.A. Bjirn Hanson Fiducoldex Boston Copley Plaza Hotel First Capital Decisions Brandon Financial Corporation First National Bank - Bartlesville Buckhead America Corporation First Noble Capital, Inc. Buena Vista Hospitality Group First Toronto - Canada Corporation Caribesun, Corp. First Union National Bank of Florida Carlisle Capital Markets Gate Petroleum Company Carlyle Construction GATX Realty Corporation Chartwell Leisure Ginsburg, Feldman & Bress Cheeca Associates Glenmoor Building Corporation Chemical Real Estate Finance Group Global Partner Hotels & Resorts E U Chippewa Indians GMAC Commercial Mortgage o LL Choice Hotels Goldman Sachs 0 cv U Choice Hotels International Granite Development Corporation 0 c o Chrysler Capital Corporation Greater Capital Corporation 0 CIGNA Corporation Greenberg, Traurig, Attorneys at Law -n Citibank, N.A. Gropo Roble International Citizens National Bank HAMDA as contractor for RTC E City of Gadsden, Alabama Harkins Associates, Inc. � 00 E Coastal Hotel Group Hart Advisers, Inc. W HCI Hotel Consulting International • Phone 305-85&7560 • Fax 305-856.5934 • http://www.HotelConsulting.n�et H-01 00,4137 1 REPRESENTATIVE LIST OF CLIENTS SERVED HCF Group, Inc. Heartland Federal Savings & Loan Hebb & Gitlin Heller Real Estate Financial Services Heller Real Estate Financial Svcs. Hellman Hibernia National Bank Hill, Ward & Henderson, P.A. Hilton Hotels Corp. Hilton International Hobb & Gitlin Hodges Ward Elliott Holguines, S.A. Holiday Inns, Inc. Hopkins & Sutter Hospitality 1st Host Marriott Corporation Hotel Asset Management Hotel Cabanas Tikal Hotel El Olivar de San Isidro Hoteles Barcelo, S.A. Hoteles Estelar Howard Savings Bank Hudson Hotels Corporation HYPO Securities, Inc. Impact Properties, Inc. Inmobiliaria El Punte Innkeepers USA Trust Inteconsa Inter -Continental Global Partner Hotels & Resorts Inter -Continental Hotels International Bank of Commerce International Hotel -Management Corp. International Union of Bricklayers/Craftworkers Interstate Hotel Corporation Interstate Management and Investment Corporation Inversiones Aries S.A. Inversiones Roble, S.A. de C.V. Inversiones Turistione El Mirador S.A. John Hancock Properties, Inc. Karena/Samoth USA Kennedy Wilson, Inc. Khouri International Construction Kimberley Development Kimberley Development Kozyak, Tropin, Throckmorton KPMG Peat Marwick Larco Mar S.A. Larken, Inc. Lee County Attorney's Office Lehman Brothers Lehndorff Toronto LET SA Lexington Mortgage Company Lowe Enterprises Investment Management Lowe Enterprises, Inc. MAC, N.A. Majestic Towers Marine Midland Bank Market View International Marriott Corporation Marriott International Marriott Ownership Resorts, Inc. Massachusetts Financial Services Mellon Bank Metro Hotels, Inc. Metro U.S., Inc. Metropolitan Life Michigan Department of Treasury Mills Corporation Morgan Stanley Mortgage Capital, Inc. U Morgan Stanley Realty 3 Morgans Hotel GroupCL Motels of America o .m. N.B.D., N.A. 0 v National Westminster Bank PLC o c c NationsBank c o o NCNB National Bank of Florida a� Niagara Asset Corporation_ Nomura Asset Capital Corporation E Norwest Bank North Dakota, N.A. 00 E Ocean Bank Operadora Metropolitana de Hoteles OPIC Orange County Purchase & Contract Department Orlando Plaza Partners P&T Investment Advisors Inc. Paramount, Inc. Patriot American Hospitality Pavillion of Orlando, Inc. PB Surf Limited HCI Hotel Consulting International • Phone 305-856.7560 • Fax 305-856.5934 • hM REPRESENTATIVE LIST 0 OF CLIENTS SERVED Pelican on Ocean, Inc. The Chase Manhattan Bank Pension Fund Advisors, Inc. The City of Coral Gables Dev. Dept. Peoples Security Insurance/Providian The Development Bank of Singapore, Ltd Pepper, Hamilton, Sheetz The Flatley Company Perpetual Real Estate Services The Hampstead Group Pinkowski & Company The Hayman Company POSADAS de Mexico The Jockey Club Price Waterhouse, Belize The John Drew Company Prime American Realty Corp. The Sunrise Club Prime Hospitality Corporation Thomas Edison Inns, Inc. Promotora Arkus Thurcon Properties, Ltd. Promotora El Faro de Cartagena Tonosal S.A. Providian Corporation Transatlantic Capital Corporation Putnam Management Company Tribe of Chippewa Indians Rafael Hotels Limited USA Unibolsa, SA Raffles Hotels and Inns United Capital Holdings Rahn Properties, Inc. Urbanas, S.A. Red Roof Inns, Inc. Vista Center Regions Bank Vista Host, Inc. Residence Inns Vistech Resort Advisors International, Inc. Weichert New Homes and Land RHW Companies, Inc. White Lodging Services Corp. River Drive Development Corp. Wilmington Savings Fund Society Rollins Jamaica, Limited Winston Hotels Royce Blackstone Development Corp. Wolfson & Starkman RTV Raleigh, Inc. Zalkin, Rodin and Goodman Salomon Brothers Inc Samoth USA Sanwa Bank Seaport Hotel Venture Seaway Hotels Corporation Selecta/Hilton International Servcco, Inc. Sidetur Ltda. Smith Barney Harris Upham & Co., Inc. Southtrust Bank, N.A. Sportsman Marina and Lodge Starwood Capital Group, LLC Starwood Lodging Corporation Sumitomo Bank, Ltd. SunBank/Miami, N.A. Submitted into the publiC Sunil Patel recor in connection with SunTrust Miami, N.A. , on is LqLcAi Inc.tem Super 8, c. Walter Foeman T & J Equities, Inc. City Clerk The Broadstone Group HCI Hotel Consulting International • Phone 305.856-7560 • Fax 305-856.5934 • htty://www.HotelConsulting.net H-01 3 00-113'7 0 0 EXAMPLES OF HOTELS APPRAISED OR EVALUATED ALABAMA - Holiday Inn Redmont, Birmingham - Holiday Inn, Birmingham* - Knights Inn, Birmingham - Marriott Courtyard - Hoover, Birmingham - Marriott Courtyard -Homewood, Birmingham - Ramada Inn & Suites, Birmingham* - Residence Inn, Birmingham - The Tutwiler Hotel, Birmingham - Hampton Inn, Dothan - Holiday Inn, Dothan - Hampton Inn, Gadsden - Proposed Convention Center Hotel, Gadsden - Holiday Inn Express, Gadsden - Knight Inn, Huntsville - Marriott Courtyard, Huntsville - Holiday Inn, Montgomery - Holiday Inn, Sheffield ARIZONA - Embassy Suites, Phoenix - The Boulders, Carefree* - AmeriSuites, Flagstaff - Wyndham Garden Hotel, Phoenix* - The Buttes, Tempe * - The Lodge & Club at Ventana Canyon, Tucson* ARKANSAS - Wyndham Garden Hotel, Chandler* - Marriott Courtyard, Little Rock - Hampton Inn, Searcy - Holiday Inn, Texarkana CALIFORNIA - AmeriSuites, Carlsbad - Carmel Valley Ranch Resort, Carmel* - Wyndham Garden Hotel, Commerce* - Wyndham Garden Hotel, Costa Mesa* - Del Mar Hilton, Del Mar - Golden Door & Resort, Escondido* - Fullerton Suites, Fullerton - Residence Inn, Fullerton - Hyatt Newporter Hotel, Newport Beach* - Hyatt Newporter Hotel, Newport Beach - Doubletree Hotel, Orange - Wyndham Palm Springs, Palm Springs* - Wyndham Garden Hotel, Pleasanton* - Residence Inn, Pleasant Hill - AmeriSuites (Otay/Mesa), San Diego - AmeriSuites(Mission Valley),San Diego - Wyndham Emerald Plaza, San Diego - Wyndham Garden Hotel, San Diego* - Holiday Inn, San Francisco - Pickwick Hotel, San Francisco* - Ramada Inn, San Francisco - AmeriSuites, San Marcos - Holiday Inn, San Pleasanton* - Residence Inn, San Ramon - Bay Meadows Race Track, San Mateo - Wyndham Garden Hotel, Sunnyvale* - Residence Inn, Torrance - Wyndham Bel Age, West Hollywood* COLORADO - Raffles Hotel, Aurora - Proposed AmeriSuites, Colorado Springs - Inverness Hotel & Golf Club, Denver - Meriden Ramada, Meriden - The Peaks at Telluride, Telluride* - Westminister Hotel, Westminister* CONNECTICUT - Holiday Inn, East Hartford v_ - Wellesley Inn, East Hartford a U - Holiday Inn, New Haven �' U_ o - Radisson Hotel, New London `' U � v - Days Inn -Norwalk, Norwalk o c c CU - Ramada, Shelton Z. ®® - Stratford Motor Lodge, Stratford 0 - Sheraton Stamford, Stamford a? - Stamford Hilton, Stamford FLORIDA � o iA - Amelia Island Plantation, Amelia Island - Turnberry Isle Resort and Club, Aventura - Boca Raton Hilton, Boca Raton - Boca Raton Resort and Hotel, Boca Raton - Proposed AmeriSuites, Boca Raton - Residence Inn, Boca Raton - Boynton Marina Place, Boynton Beach - Holiday Inn, Boynton Beach - Courtyard by Marriott, Brandon - Proposed Fairfield Inn, Brandon - Mayfair House, Coconut Grove HCI Hotel Consulting International - Phone 305.856.7560 - Fax 305-856-5934 - hLV://www.Hote]Consulting.net H-01 00-113 / 1 0 0 EXAMPLES OF HOTELS APPRAISED OR EVALUATED - Proposed Hampton Inn- Coconut Grove - Proposed Residence Inn, Coconut Grove - Biltmore Hotel, Coral Gables - David William Hotel, Coral Gables - Holiday Inn, Coral Gables - Merrick Hotel Proposed, Coral Gables - Hampton Inn - Clearwater - Holiday Inn, Clearwater - Howard Johnsons Pirates Cove - Daytona - Holiday Inn-Sunspree, Daytona Beach - Hilton Deerfield Beach, Deerfield, Beach - Knights Inn, Florida City - Bonaventure Golf Course, Ft. Lauderdale - Bonaventure Spa & Resort, Ft. Lauderdale* - Comfort Suites, Ft. Lauderdale - Cypress Creek Inn, Ft. Lauderdale - Doubletree Guest Suites, Ft. Lauderdale - Hilton Hotel/Retail Development, Ft. Lauderdale - Holiday Inn, Ft. Lauderdale by the Sea - Marriott Hotel & Marina, Ft. Lauderdale - Marriott's Harbor Beach, Ft. Lauderdale - Proposed Hilton Garden Inn, Ft. Lauderdale - Proposed Wellesley Inn, Sawgrass, Ft. Lauderdale - Registry Resort & Spa, Ft. Lauderdale - Sheraton Execuport, Ft. Lauderdale - Sheraton Ft. Lauderdale, Ft. Lauderdale - Holiday Inn, Fort Myers - Wellesley Inn, Fort Myers - Holiday Inn, Fort Walton Beach* - Fairfield Inn, Gainesville - Park Plaza Hotel, Hialeah - Prpsd. Diamond on the Beach, Hollywood Beach - Quality Suites Oceanside, Indialantic - Cheeca Lodge, Islamorada - Best Inn, Jacksonville - Courtyard by Marriott, Jacksonville - Hampton Inn, Jacksonville* - Mayo Inn, Jacksonville - Proposed Compri, Jacksonville - Radisson Riverwalk, Jacksonville* - Red Roof Inn - Jacksonville - Residence Inn, Jacksonville - Holiday Inn Sunspree, Jacksonville Beach - Sheraton Beach Hotel, Jensen Beach - Wellesley Inn - Jupiter - Proposed Radisson Hotel, Kendall - Sunrise Club, Kendall - Sheraton, Key Largo - Fairfield Inn by Marriott, Key West - Hampton Inn, Key West - Holiday Inn, Key West - Holiday Inn - La Concha, Key West - Hyatt Hotel, Key West - Marriott Casa Marina, Key West - The Reach Hotel, Key West - Comfort Inn, Kissimmee - Comfort Suites, Kissimmee - Hilton Garden Inn, Kissimmee - Howard Johnson Eastgate, Kissimmee - Howard Johnson Maingate, Kissimmee - Orlando Hampton Inn, Kissimmee - Proposed Best West Western, Kissimmee - Proposed South Beach Resort & Timeshare, Kissimmee - Quality Suites - Maingate East, Kissimmee - Travelodge Suites, Kissimmee - Wilson World, Kissimmee - Travelodge Walt Disney World Village, Lake Buena Vista - Proposed Sierra Suites, Lake Buena Vista - Buena Vista Palace, Lake Buena Vista - Flagship Inn, Lake County - Proposed Hampton Inn, Lakeland - Proposed Wellesley Inn, Lakeland - Lake Park Inn, Lake Park - Proposed Sheraton Suites, Marco Island - Courtyard by Marriott, Melbourne - Melbourne Hilton, Melbourne* - Courtyard by Marriott, Miami - Crowne Plaza Hotel, Miami - Days Inn - Civic Center, Miami v w c IV ctf - Days Inn - Miami Airport, Miami 3 E U - Doral Golf Resort & Spa, Miami c ory t° - Fairfield Inn, Miami v m - Grand Bay Hotel, Miami* o c C: CU - Holiday Inn, Civic Center, Miami c o - Holiday Inn Downtown, Miami v - Holiday Inn Golden Glades, Miami 2 c: 1 - Holiday Inn Miami Airport, Miami •E - Holiday Inn, MIA, Miami* v - Hotel Sofitel, Miami co L A - Hyatt Regency Hotel, Miami - Inter -Continental Hotel, Miami HCI Hotel Consulting International • Phone 305-856-7560 • Fax 305.856.5934 • htip://www.HotelConsulting.net H-01 Z 00-1137 EXAMPLES OF HOTELS APPRAISED OR EVALUATED - Inter -Continental Intl' Strategic Consulting, Miami - Inter -Continental Intl' Competitive Study, Miami - Occidental Plaza Suites, Miami - Proposed AmeriSuites, Kendall, Miami - AmeriSuites Kendall, Miami - Proposed AmeriSuites, Miami - Proposed Hampton Inn, Miami - Proposed Hotel or Resort, Miami - Proposed Jockey Club Hotel, Miami - Proposed Suite Hotel, Miami - Sheraton Gateway, Miami* - Proposed Hampton Inn, Miami Airport - Proposed Inter -Continental Hotel, Miami Airport - Hampton Inn, Miami Airport - Ramada MIA Hotel, Miami - Turnberry Isle Resort & Club, North Miami - Best Western, Miami Beach - Crescent Timeshare, Miami Beach - Delano Hotel, Miami Beach - Don Shula's Hotel & Club, Miami Lakes - Doral Ocean Beach Resort, Miami Beach - Hilton Fontainbleau, Miami Beach - Proposed Sheraton Suites, Miami Beach - Proposed Westin, Miami Beach - Proposed Hotel, Miami Beach - Royal Palm Hotel, Miami Beach - Shelborne Beach Hotel, Miami Beach - The Alexander Hotel, Miami Beach - The Carlyle Hotel, Miami Beach - Wellesley Inn - Miami Airport - Hampton Inn, Naples - Proposed Hilton, Naples - Wellesley Inn - Naples - Quality Inn, Naples - Hilton Hotel, N. Redington Beach - AmeriSuites (I -Drive), Orlando - Comfort Inn - Orlando - Comfort Inn, Orlando - Comfort Suites, Orlando - Days Inn - International Drive, Orlando - Days Inn, Orlando - Doubletree Hotel, Orlando - Econolodge Hawaiian Resort, Orlando - Econolodge Maingate East, Orlando - Embassy Suites Jamaican Court, Orlando - Embassy Suites, Orlando - Fairfield Inn Orlando/South, Orlando - Fairfield Inn, Orlando - Hawthrone Suites, Orlando - Heritage Inn, Orlando - Holiday Inn Express (I Drive), Orlando - Holiday Inn Maingate, Orlando - Holiday Inn Sunspree, Orlando - Howard Johnson Maingate, Orlando - Hyatt Orlando, Orlando - Marriott's World Center, Orlando - Melia Suites, Orlando - Orlando Plaza Suite, Orlando - Peabody Hotel, Orlando - Proposed Best Suites, Orlando - Proposed Convention Hotel, Orlando - Proposed Convention Center Hotel, International Drive, Orlando - Proposed Doubletree, Orlando - Proposed Hampton Inn Maingate West, Orlando - Proposed Hilton Garden Inn UCF, Orlando - Proposed Sierra Suites, Orlando - Proposed Wellesley Inn, Orlando - Proposed Westin Hotel, Orlando - Ramada Resort, Orlando - Ramada Westgate, Orlando - Sheraton Maitland Hotel, Orlando - Westin Hotel, Orlando - Wyndham Garden Inn, Orlando - AmeriSuites, Orlando Airport - Courtyard by Marriott, Orlando Airport - Courtyard by Marriott, Orlando International - Embassy Suites, Palm Beach Gardens - Marriott's Bay Point, Panama City v c - Proposed Hampton Inn, Pembroke Pines .0 .3 E U - Hampton Inn, Pensacola Q c 5 - Holiday Inn - Gulf Breeze, Pensacola w v (`, ` U - Holiday Inn Express, Pensacola T - Holiday Inn Express, Pensacola o o - Holiday Inn, Pensacola c� - Residence Inn, Pensacola aai .c - Proposed Hampton Inn, Pensacola Beach `- - Holiday Inn Plantation, Plantation X-1 v - Holiday Inn, Plantation co '24 - Proposed Hilton Garden Inn, Orlando - Proposed Residence Inn, Plantation HCI Hotel Consulting International • Phone 305-856-7560 • Fax 305-856-5934 • h=://www.HotelConsulting.net H-01 3 oo-1137 9 0 EXAMPLES OF HOTELS APPRAISED OR EVALUATED - Proposed Residence Inn, Plantation - Proposed Residence Inn, Plantation - Proposed Residence Inn, Plantation - The Sheraton Suites, Plantation - Wellesley Inn - Plantation - Wellesley Inn, Plantation - Plantation Yacht Harbor, Plantation Key - Holiday Inn, Pompano Beach - Holiday Inn, Pompano Beach - Ponte Vedra Inn & Cnvn. Ctr, Ponte Vedra - The Lodge & Bath Chub, Ponte Vedra Beach - Safety Harbor Spa, Safety Harbor - Proposed Sheraton Hotel, Sarasota - Wellesley Inn - Sarasota - Holiday Inn, Sebring - Proposed Hotel, Sebastian - Holiday Inn, Singer Island - Radisson Resort, Singer Island* - Vacant Land, Singer Island - Holiday Inn, St. Augustine - Majestic Towers ACLF, St. Petersburg - Residence Inn, St. Petersburg - Days Inn - Starke - Econolodge, Starke - Indian River Plantation, Stuart - Palms Resort on the Ocean, Surfside - Days Inn, Surfside Beach - Best Inn, Tallahassee - Courtyard by Marriott, Tallahassee - Doubletree, Tallahassee - Holiday Inn Capitol Plaza, Tallahassee* - Red Roof Inn - Tallahassee - Sheraton, Tallahassee - Tampa AmeriSuites, Tampa - Doubletree Hotel, Tampa - Holiday Inn Sabal Park, Tampa - Hyatt Regency, Tampa - Omni Tampa at Westshore, Tampa - Proposed AmeriSuites, Tampa - Proposed Courtyard, Tampa - Proposed Fairfield Inn, Tampa - Proposed Holiday Inn Express, Tampa - Proposed Holiday Inn, Tampa - Proposed Homegate Suites, Tampa - Proposed Sheraton Suites, Tampa - Sheraton Grand Tampa, Tampa* - Wyndham Harbor Island, Tampa` - Holiday Inn - Countryside, Vero Beach - Holiday Inn - Oceanside, Vero Beach - Hampton Inn, West Palm Beach - Palm Beach Hilton and Resort, West Palm Beach - Wellesley Inn - West Palm Beach - Proposed All -Suite Hotel, Weston - Proposed Best Western, Yulee - Masters Economy Inn, Zephyrhills GEORGIA - Amerisuites North Point, Alpharetta - Castlegate Hotel and Conference Center, Atlanta - Courtyard by Marriott, Atlanta - Doubletree Guest Suites, Atlanta - Hampton Inn & Suites, Atlanta - Hampton Inn Perimeter Mall, Atlanta* - Holiday Inn Lenox, Atlanta - Peachtree Conference Center, Atlanta* - Proposed AmeriSuites, Atlanta - Radisson Hotel Downtown, Atlanta* - Red Roof Inn - Atlanta - Wyndham Midtown, Atlanta - Wyndham Garden Hotel Perimeter Ctr, Atlanta - Wyndham Garden Hotel Vinnings, Atlanta - Fairfield, Atlanta Airport - Fairfield, Atlanta Gwinnett - Fairfield, Atlanta Northlake - Fairfield, Atlanta Northwest - Fairfield, Atlanta Peachtree Fairfield, Atlanta Southlake - Hyatt Hotel, Atlanta Airport - Proposed AmeriSuites, Buckhead - Proposed Hampton Inn, Buckhead - Residence Inn, Buckhead c� C - Holiday Inn, Brunswick -J`oca - Residence Inn, Cumberland Q c U - Holiday Inn - Conference Center, Decatur a) .o �o ZZ - Holiday Inn, Decatur .0 U - Residence Inn, Dunwoody c Cry - Holiday Inn, Jekyll Island v o - Jekyll Inn, Jekyll Island Q) .c 1 - Proposed Amerisuites, Kennesaw - Coutyard by Marriott, Lithonia .08 - Fairfield Inn, Lithonia co - Masters Economy Inn, Macon HCI Hotel Consulting International • Phone 305-856.7560 • Fax 305.856-5934 • hlM://www.Hote]Consultiniz.net H-01 4 00-113'7 0 0 EXAMPLES OF HOTELS APPRAISED OR EVALUATED - Masters Economy Inn, McDonough - Masters Economy Inn, Six Flags - Masters Economy Inn, Tifton - Masters Economy Inn, Warner -Robins HAWAII - Park Shore Hotel, Honolulu* ILLINOIS - AmeriSuites, Arlington Heights - Holiday Inn -Champaign, Champaign - Ambassador West Hotel, Chicago - Days Inn, Chicago - Lenox House, Chicago - The Raphael, Chicago - The Tremont House, Chicago - Holiday Inn -Des Plaines, Des Plaines - Holiday Inn, Des Plaines* - Orrington Hotel, Evanston - Doubletree, Glenview* - AmeriSuites - Hoffman - Wyndham Northwest, Itasaca* - Holiday Inn, Matteson - Wyndham Garden Hotel, Napperville - Radisson Northbrook* - Sheraton Inn, Northbrook - Red Roof Inn - Rockford - Wyndham Garden Hotel, Schaumburg* - Wyndham Wood Dale, Wood Dale* INDIANA - Knights Inn, Indianapolis - Omni Severin Hotel, Indianapolis - Wyndham Garden Hotel, Indianapolis* - Knights Inn, Richmond IOWA - Residence Inn, Clive - AmeriSuites, Topeka - The Broadview Hotel, Wichita* KENTUCKy - Proposed Thomas Moore Hotel and Conference Center, Crestview Hills - Holiday Inn, Corbin - Proposed Hotel, Covington - Marriott Landmark Hotel, Covington - Marriott Land Mark Hotel, Covington - Hilton Hotel, Florence* - Hyatt Regency, Lexington* - AmeriSuites, Louisville LOUISIANA - Holiday Inn, Alexandria - Residence Inn, Baton Rouge - AmeriSuites, Baton Rouge - Best Western Hotel, Lafayette - Quality Inn, Metairie - Proposed Hampton Inn, New Orleans - Radisson, New Orleans - Wyndham Riverfront, New Orleans* - Fairmont Hotel, Fairmont- MAINE Hampton Inn, South Portland - Sheraton Tara, South Portland MARYLAND - Holiday Inn - Belmont Boulevard, Baltimore - Holiday Inn - Cromwell Bridge Road, Baltimore - Holiday Inn - Glen Burnie, Baltimore - Holiday Inn - International Airport, Baltimore - Holiday Inn - Moravia Road, Baltimore - Holiday Inn - Pickesville, Baltimore - Holiday Inn - South Glen Burnie, Baltimore - Holiday Inn Inner Harbor Downtown, Baltimore - Lord Baltimore Hotel, Baltimore U c KANSAS - Omni Baltimore, Baltimore* 0 CIS 4) E U - Holiday Inn, Lawrence - Proposed AmeriSuites, Baltimore o. N - Holiday Inn, Manhattan - Ramada Inn, Bethesda ® LL U - AmeriSuites, Overland Park - Days Inn, Camp Springs - Doubletree, Overland Park - Red Roof Inn, Chesapeake o - Marriott Courtyard, Overland Park - Residence Inn, Cockeysville c v i - Radisson, Overland Park* - Days Inn, Easton - Residence Inn, Overland Park - Holiday Inn, Frederick - Wyndham Garden Hotel, Overland Park* - Embassy Suites, Hunt Valley E o � U HCI Hotel Consulting International • Phone 305-85&7560 • Fax 305-85&5934 • http://www.Hote]Consultin .ng_eY . H-01 00-113 / 5 0 0 EXAMPLES OF HOTELS APPRAISED OR EVALUATED MASSACHUSETTS - Back Bay Hilton, Boston - Copley Plaza Hotel, Boston - Tremont House Hotel, Boston - Proposed World Trade Center Hotel, Boston - Hampton Inn -Lawrence, Lawrence - Marriott Hotel, Worcester MICHIGAN - Residence Inn, Ann Arbor - Wyndham Garden Hotel, Bloomington* - Knights Inn, Battle Creek - Proposed AmeriSuites, Detroit - AmeriSuites Auburn Hills, Detroit - Knights Inn, Flint - Grand Rapids Hilton, Kentwood* - Holiday Inn West, Lansing - Quality Suites, Lansing - Knights Inn, Monroe - Wyndham Garden Hotel, Novi* - Proposed Hampton Inn, Port Huron - Sheraton Fashion Square, Saginaw - Thomas Edison Inns, various locations - Radisson Resort & Conference Center, Ypsilanti MINNESOTA - Embassy Suites, Bloomington - Luxeford Suites Hotel, Minneapolis - Northland Inn & Exec. Con£ Ctr., Minneapolis - Sheraton Park Place, St. Louis Park MISSISSIppi - Ramada Inn Coliseum, Jackson - Residence Inn, Jackson - Red Roof Inn -Jackson, Jackson MISSOURI - Double Tree Hotel & Suites, Chesterfield - Elms Hotel, Excelsior Springs - Red Roof Inn, Independence - Super 8, Independence - Radisson Kansas City, Kansas City* - Residence Inn, Kansas City - Super 8, North Kansas City - Red Roof Inn,Kansas City - Super 8, Liberty - Super 8, St. Joseph - AmeriSuites, St. Louis - Mayfair Suites, St. Louis* - Harley Hotel, St. Louis* - St. Louis Airport Hilton, St. Louis - Red Roof Inn - Springfield NEBRASKA - Residence Inn, Lincoln - Famingo Inn, South Sioux City NEW JERSEY - Holiday Inn -Edison, Edison - Wellesley Inn, Edison - Best Western Whittier, Egg Harbor - Holiday Inn JetPort, Elizabeth* - Proposed Marriott Suite Hotel, Elmwood Park - Princeton Marriott, Princeton - Days Inn -Meadowlands, East Rutherford - Envoy Inn, Tinton Falls - Sunrise Suite Hotel, Tinton Falls - Red Roof Inn, Seacaucus (Meadowlands) - Proposed AmeriSuites, Secaucus U c C .Lc Co NEVADA E U - Crowne Plaza, Las Vegas li � - Proposed AmeriSuites, Las Vegas �. U - St. Tropez Suites, Las Vegas o •�ti_,0 NEW MExiCO es Best Western High Mesa, Santafe <n� NEW YORK E �- ©E - Hilton Hotel, Albany - Marriott Hotel, Albany - Holiday Inn, Corbin - Wyndham Garden Hotel, East Elhurst* - Marriott Hotel - LaGuardia Airport, Flushing - Wind Watch Hotel & Golf, Hauppauge - Howard Johnson, Latham - Proposed Courtyard by Marriott, Manhattan - Proposed Econo Lodge, Manhattan - Proposed Greenwich Street Hotel, Manhattan - Proposed tourney's End, Manhattan* - Proposed Ramada Hotel & owners, Manhattan* - Hampton Inn, Rochester* NORTH CAROLINA - Sheraton Motor Inn, Asheville HCI Hotel Consulting International • Phone 305-856-7560 • Fax 305.856-5934 • http:, H-01 9 0 EXAMPLES OF HOTELS APPRAISED OR EVALUATED - Days Inn, Asheville - Homewood Suites, Cary* - AmeriSuites, Charlotte - AmeriSuites Arrowood, Charlotte - Knights Inn, Charlotte - Wyndham Garden Hotel, Charlotte* - Holiday Inn, Fayetteville - Knights Inn, Fayetteville - Red Roof Inn, Greensboro - Proposed AmeriSuites, Greensboro - AmeriSuites, Greensboro - Radisson Plaza Hotel, Raleigh - Holiday Inn, Raleigh - Doubletree Hotel, Raleigh/Durham - Doubletree Guest Suites, Raleigh/Durham - Courtyard by Marriott, Wilmington* NORTH DAKOTA - Proposed Hampton Inn, Fargo - Proposed Ramada Inn, Fargo - Ramada Hotel, Fargo OHIO - Radisson Inn Akron, Akron* - Aurora Inn, Aurora - Pine Lake Trout Club, Aurora - Sheraton Inn, Aurora - Courtyard Beachwood, Beachwood* - Radisson Inn Beachwood, Beachwood* - Hampton Inn, Canton* - AmeriSuites Blue Ash, Cincinatti - AmeriSuites Forest Park, Cincinatti - Hampton Inn, Cleveland* - Hilton South Resort, Cleveland* - Proposed AmeriSuites, Cleveland - AmeriSuites, Columbus - Knights Inn Columbus - Knights Inn, Dayton - Clarion Hotel- Eastlake, Eastlake - Amerisuites, Independence - Holiday Inn -Mayfield, Mayfield - Knights Inn, Sharonville - Balhalla Hotel, Toledo - Crowne Plaza Toledo, Toledo* - Holiday Inn - Southwest, Toledo - Marriott Portside, Toledo - Holiday Inn, Westlake* OKLAHOMA - Residence at the Trails Inn, Norman - Proposed AmeriSuites, Oklahoma City - Tulsa Doubletree, Tulsa* OREGON - Proposed Amerisuites, Lake Oswego - Holiday Inn, Crowne Plaza, Portland PENNSYLVANIA - Howard Johnson Lodge, Erie - Holiday Inn - Hazelton - Holiday Inn - Rt. 30E, Lancaster - Holiday Inn - Rt. 501, Lancaster - Red Roof Inn, Monroeville - The Executive, Panama - Bellevue Stratford, Philadelphia - Philadelphia Airport Marriott, Philadelphia - Red Roof Inn, Philadelphia - Residence Inn, Philadelphia - Wyndham Franklin Plaza, Philadelphia - Trevose Radisson, Trevose - Holiday Inn - Market Street, York - Holiday Inn - I - 83 & Rt. 30, York SOUTH CAROLINA - AmeriSuites, Columbia - Sheraton Charleston, Charleston - Holiday Inn, Florence - Holiday Inn, Hilton Head - Proposed Residence Inn, Hilton Head - Coral Beach Resort, Myrtle Beach - Myrtle Beach Hilton, Myrtle Beach - Days Inn, Surfside Beach SOUTH DAKOTA - Foothills Inn, Rapid City - Ramada Inn, Rapid City - Quality Inn, Rapid City ql,'�! totted into the public TENNESSEE r"01-'or in connection - Holiday Inn - Knoxville* item / on / - Proposed Microtel, Knoxville Waiter Foeman - Microtel Inn, Knoxville Cit;r Clerk - Red Roof Inn, Knoxville - Holiday Inn - East, Memphis HCI Hotel Consulting International • Phone 305-856-7560 • Fax 305-85&5934 • hLV://www.HotelConsulting.net H 1 00- 113ns7 0 0 EXAMPLES OF HOTELS APPRAISED OR EVALUATED - Holiday Inn - I-40/Sycamore View, Memphis - Holiday Inn, San Marcos - Proposed Hotel Conversion, Memphis - Proposed Country Inn and Suites, McAllen - Red Roof Inn, Memphis UTAH - Residence Inn - Memphis East - Holiday Inn - Nashville* - Holiday Inn, Salt Lake City - Union Station Hotel, Nashville* - Wyndham Garden Hotel Nashville Airport, Nashville TEXAS - AmeriSuites, Arlington - Arlington Hilton, Arlington - Hampton Inn - Arlington - Microtel Hotel, Arlington - Proposed Marriott Courtyard, Arlington - Hampton Inn, Austin - Holiday Inn - Austin* - Proposed Marriott Courtyard, Bedford - Hampton Inn, DFW Airport - Hilton Executive Conference Ctr, Dallas* - AmeriSuites Park Central, Dallas - Red Roof Inn - Dallas (East), Dallas - Red Roof Inn - Dallas (Market Center), Dallas - Wyndham Garden Hotel(Market Center),Dallas* - Proposed AmeriSuites Fossil Creek, Ft. Worth - Proposed AmeriSuites Hulen Mall, Ft. Worth - Hampton Inn - Garland - Doubletree Allen Center,Houston* - Doubletree Hotel, Houston - Wyndham Greenspoint, Houston - AmeriSuites, Irving - Microtel Hotel, Irving - Proposed Marriott Courtyard, Irving - Wyndham Garden Hotel Las Colinas, Irving* - Holiday Inn YO Ranch, Kerriville* - Holiday Inn, Laredo - Holiday Inn - Orange, Orange - Microtel Hotel, Plano - Holiday Inn - San Antonio* - Proposed Marriott - River Center, San Antonio VIRGINIA - Radisson Hotel at Mark Center, Alexandria - Proposed Embassy Suites, Alexandria - AmeriSuites, Chesapeake - Wellesley Inn, Chesapeake - Residence Inn, Herndon - Radisson Hotel, Richmond - Proposed AmeriSuites, Richmond - AmeriSuites Richmond/Innsbrook,Richmond - Knights Inn, Richmond - Embassy Suites, Tysons Corner - Proposed AmeriSuites, Roanoke WASHINGTON - Wyndham Garden Hotel Tacoma Airport, Seattle* WASHINGTON, D.C. - Sheraton City Center, D.0 - Marriott Gateway - Wyndham Bristor, D.C* WISCONSIN - Wyndham Garden Hotel, Brookfield* - Holiday Inn, Eau Claire - Milwaukee River Hilton, Glendale* - Residence Inn, Green Bay - Wyndham Milwaukee Center, Milwaukee* - Holiday Inn Gateway, Wausau 'Personal Property Valuations Submitted into the public record 'n connection with item on 2 c, I Walter Foeman City Cleric HCI Hotel Consulting International • Phone 305-856-7560 • Fax 305-856-5934 • htlp://www.HotelConsulting.net H-01 00-1.137 8 Zoning Code Sec 1305 MOULh of Miami River and Brickell Point 1896, Miami, Fla. § 1304 MLAMI,TLORIDA . unless and Vhtil the applications shall havebeen completed; all plans, reports or other information; exhibits, or documents required by this zoning ordinance or administra- tive rules adopted pursuant hereto shall have been, provided; and all fees due at time of film shalt have"been aid. g: P .. 1304 2 3 :Application forms; supplemeiiiary;:materials:-,,Duriiig:ptocessing,of any.applica= tion, if it is determined by the designated agent, agency, or body of the city that in the particular circumstances of the case additional information is required to make nec- essary findings'=bearing on_ is approval;,,denial. or;conditions__and-safeguards to�;be; i attached,, suclidnformation may, requested: Failure to supplysuch_supplementary ,. _ information may..be..used as .grounds -for denial of the permit. (Ord. No. 10863, § 1, 3-28-91; Ord. No. 10976, § 1, 4-20-92; Ord. No. 11079, § 4) 7-22-93) Sec. 1305._ Considerations,generally; standards;.findings and determinations required., Asappr"opriate to the nature of the special permit involved -and the particular circum- stances. of the case, the following considerations and standards shall apply generally, in ad- dition to any other standards and requirements set forth concerning the class or kind of permit being considered: City agents,' -agencies, or boards charged with decisions concerning special' permits shall make, or cause to be made; written findings and deierminationsconcerning such of the --following matters -ems are applicable in the case- shall reflect such considerations and standards specifically in the record, and shall be guided by such considerations and standards in their _decisions as- to " issuance of permits, with --or without cgnditions and safeguards, or denial of. applications. 1305.1. Ingress and egress. Review for adequacy shall be given to ingress and egress to the property and structure and uses thereon, with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or other emergency. 1305.2. Offstreet parking and loading. Review for adequacy shall be given to offstreet parking and loading facilities as related to adjacent streets, with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and conve- nience, internal traffic flow and control, arrangement in relation to access in case of fire or other emergency, and screening and landscaping. 1305.3. Refuse and service areas. Review for adequacy shall be given to the location, scale, design, and screening of refuse and service areas; to the manner in which refuse is to be stored; and to the manner and timing of refuse collection and deliveries, shipments, or other service activities, as such matters relate to the location and nature of uses on adjoining properties and to the location and character of adjoining public ways. 1305.4. Signs and lighting. Submitted into the public supp. No. 2 462 record in connection vaith. item Z—S on —/1Loe Waiter Foeman 00-1137 Z§ 1306 ZONING ,.; 'Review for adequacy shall be given to the number, size, character, location, and orienta- tion of proposed signs, and of,prpppsedlighting,for signs and premises, "with.particular refer- ence to traffic safety, glare, and compatibility and harmony with adjoining and nearby prop- erty and the claracter `of tfie urea 1305.5. Utilities.: r .. -... Review for adequacy shall be given to:_utilities required, -with particular reference to availability and,capacity of systems,. -location of connect ons,,and. potentially, adverse appear- ance or other adverse. --effects- on adjoining and'`iiearby property.°and the thai racter of the area. 1305.6. Drainage.,_ - Review for adequacy shall be-glveriao provision for drainage, vinth pprticular reference to effect on adjoining and nearbyproperties and..on general drainage systems -in the area. Where major drainage volumes appearlikely and capacity. of available systems is found marginal or inadequate, consideration shall -be given to- possibilities -for,recharge;of groundwater supply on the property, temporary retention _with gradual-Aischarge, bo other remedial measures. 1305.7. Preservation" of natural features. - Review for -appropriateness shall, be given to provision -for the preservation of existing vegetation and geological features whenever possible. 1305.8. Control of potentially adverse effects generally. In addition to the review of detailed -items indicated -above, as appropriateto'the particular; class or kind of special permit and the circumstances of the particular case, review for appro- oriateness shall be" given to potentially adverse effects generally on adjoining and nearby properties, the area, the neighborhood, or the city, of the use or occupancy as proposed, or its location, construction, design, character, scale or manner of operation. Where such potentially adverse effects are found, consideration shall be given to special remedial measures appro- priate in the particular circumstances of the case, including screening or buffering, land- scaping,'control -of manner or hours -of operation, alteration of proposed design or construction of buildings, relocation of proposed open space or alteration of use of such space, or such other measures as are required to assure that such potential adverse effects will be eliminated or minimized to the maximum extent reasonably feasible, and that the. use or occupancy will be compatible and harmonious with other development in the area to a degree which will avoid substantial depreciation of the value of nearby property. (Ord. No. 10863, § 1, 3-28-91; Ord. No. 10976, § 1, 4-20-92) ..See..1306. Conditions and safeguards.. The agent, agency,, or body of the, city designated by this zoning ordinance as having responsibility for issuance or denial of each of the classes of special permits set out in this article 13 shalf have authority to attach to the grant of any such special permit such conditions and safeguards as may be necessary for the purposes of this zoning ordinance in the particular case. Submitted into the public record in connection with supp. No. z 463 item Z—S /4(-0c Walter Foeman _ 113 7 Submitted into the public record in connection with item on 1-2- LLCO Walter Foeman City .rk 00 -1137 • PLANNING FACT SHEET U APPLICANT Lucia A Dougherty, Esq. for The Related Group of Florida. HEARING DATE November 15, 2000 REQUEST/LOCATION Consideration of a substantial modificationto the previously approved Major Use Special Permit for Phase I of the One Miami Project located at approximately 205 Biscayne Boulevard. LEGAL DESCRIPTION Complete legal description on file with the Hearing Boards Office. PETITION Consideration of approving a substantial modification to the previously approved Major Use Special Permit for the One Miami Project located at approximately 205 Biscayne Boulevard, in order to allow the development of Phase I of the, project, consisting of a 34-story, 623,348 sq.ft. office tower, a' 49-story, 425 residential unit apartment building, with related amenities and, a 12-story parking garage which includes 1,834 parking spaces. PLANNING Approval with conditions. RECOMMENDATION i BACKGROUND AND Please see attached analysis. ANALYSIS Submitted into the public S record in connection with item on�1—cr Walter Foeman ' City Clerk PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD VOTE: CITY COMMISSION APPLICATION NUMBER 2000-070 Item #8 CITY OF MIAMI • PLANNING DEPARTMENT 444 SW 2ND AVENUE, 3RD FLOOR , MIAMI, FLORIDA, 33130 PHONE (305) 416-1400 Date: 11/08/2000 A 4 el 114 Page 1 • - �. Ana}ysis for -major U"e Sp+ecaal Permit=for-1be ONE MIAMI —.PHASE I PROJECT .located at • 205 South Biscayne -Boulevard CASE NO. 2000-070 Pursuant to Ordinance 11000, as amended, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida Ahe -subject proposal-for'the=One Miaini - Phase I Project'has.beeri Teviewed to allow a -Major Pse:Special Permit. This Permit also includes the following requests: CLASS- I SPECIAL PERMIT -as=per Article 9 `Section 906'6 `-for active recrea " -" t• al fac•lities (in 1 d' °swimmin of} ' ' - ion i c u mg a g Po --- CLASS I SPECIAL PERMT:as per Section 915.2 for FAA clearance_letter; CLASS :I SPECIAL_PERMIT::.to permit :stagiag.,and parking during construction .(to be approved. prior to obtaining a building permit.from Planning); . CLASS I .SPECIAL PERMIT for Development, Signs when combined with con- struction/rental signs; CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 917.2.1 to 'allow valet parking for residential use; CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as for a temporary construction trailer; CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 4, Section 401 for development of new construction within the Central Business District; CLASS II, SPECIAL PERMIT for a temporary construction fence and covered walkway; _. CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 15 for any development between Biscayne Bay and the first dedicated right-of-way; t CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 15 for waiver of certain Guides and Standards for 5 feet driveway from property line; CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Section 908.2 for access from a public street or roadway width greater than 25 feet; Submitted into the public record in connection v►rith item Z—�L on /ti--Oe n (l Waiter Foeman !► �+ " 3 V CLASS'�IT SPECIAL -PERMIT 'as per Article 9; Section'908 for development on Biscay,.ne�Boulevard; : Special. Exception as per -Article, 4, Sec: _4.01 to allow bar/lounge open to the pub- lic, Special Exception as per Article, 9, Sec. 917.1.2 to allow valet parking for restau- rant up to 50% o of existing off-street parking spaces; Certificate -of Appropnateness i ground disturbing activity in an archeological conservation area (city 'Cbde Section 23=5a); Designation as a=phased'-project; pursuant to Section 2502 of Zoning- Ordinance 11000, as amended. Waiver from the City -Commission for the following 1. Noise Ordinance during: the .required concrete pours for construction of the building (City, Code Chapter.36). . 2. Waterfront Charter provision 3(mm)(iii). Pursuant to Articles 13 and 17 of Zoning Ordinance 11000, approval of the requested Major Use Special. Permit shall be considered sufficient for the subordinate permits requested and referenced above as well as any other special approvals required by the City which may be' required to carry out the requested plans. The requested Special Permit is for the purpose of allowing a mixed -use development project with consisting .of-623,348 sq. ft. of office and retail use, and 'a total of 425 residential units, with 1,834 parking spaces, for the property located at approximately 205 South Biscayne $oulevard (see attached legal description, location maps and aerial photographs .for exact property boundaries). In determining the appropriateness of -the proposed resideptial project, the Planning and Zoning Department has referred this project to the' Large Scale Development Committee (LSDC), the City of -Miami Preservation Officer, and the :Urban Development Review Board (UDRB) for additional input and recommendations; the following findings have been made: Submitted into the public record in connection wd th item 2-S on a Walter Foeman 00-1137 • It ."is found thati '' the proposed ' office and reSidei iial -'develohtriietit protect with accessory retail,. --will ._benefit; the Downtown .District by .creating new housing ' opportunities in the core area to serve Downtown. • It is found that the subject property has convenient access to public transit that makes it ideally suited`"for`residential .and office as a mixed use to serve the downtown area. • it. is found that .per the Fire and GSA Departments of the City, the roof of the proposed struet tre-may be required for communications equiptnentcto serve the'City; this are should be made available. for said use at no charge to the City. • It is found that the City of Miami Preservation- Officer reviewed -the project and -that a recommendation was made regarding archeological monitoring in the manner set forth in the condition-describedbelow. • It is found that the project was reviewed by the Large Scale Development Committee on August. 22,-. 2000 and has been modified to address :the - expressed technical concerns raised at . said Large Scale Development Committee meeting; however, additional design details related to sidewalk and swale area 'mp' rovements will have to be submitted .at the .time of permitting. • It is found that the UbRB has recommended approval -Of -theproposed project, with the condition- as specified below, pursuant to a public meeting held on October 23, 2000. UDRB Condition: 1) Make revisions to the apartment buildings and come back to UDRB within 90 days of MUSP approval before building permit. Review: articulation of the apartment building; massing; and detailing. • It is found .that the narrow widthand irregular .shape of a portion of the subject property is a substantial hardship that limits reasonable use of the property and therefore justifies the requested Waterfront Charter modification, and additionally, public benefits have been adequately provided for; final design details pertaining to the bay and river walks shall be subject to -review and approval by the Director of Planning and Zoning. • It is found that the proposed project -offers the most reasonable solution to the design problarr� facing this particular site. Submitted into the public record in connection . with item 2LL on Walter Foeman O 0 —1 3'7 e �pr6pos_ d-- t t Public�..% eks. d the is'fbuhd:Ahat u ri-:�re efral 'th' e -projec o 0 Downtown.NET Office,, the following c9rnments were received : ui Pursuant to the Department of Public Works; the project requires plans for proposed sidewalk and swale area improvements, prior to., the -issuance of a 1:-"!, ''building permit; ;and ' 'h _N E applicant s 2. Pursuant to theDowntown T Office; tfi6� an ift submit a parking" an -,o erational plan,jor. p yee -plan....,for ;construction.; r.cmplp s, includin construction activity and enforcement; said parking plan shall be subject to the review and id'y-Ith6 Noartin6rit-of Pl'-an-�'n-'mgand,�-zoriing'prior.--t6the'-,--�I -- ipprov, b issuance of any building permits.. - itii& -difficultif not impossiblJor It is found that, as a phased -development pr-oject i- V- e - the developer to anticipate levels of actual future development and associated traffic impacts associated with such development. In order to- adequately ensure that adverse impacts to, the area will not occur, the Planning and Zoning Department would -recommend that'a condition be added to this development, order which requires the applicant .to 'conduct updated -traffic studies prior -,to, obtaining building permits ,for, each subsequent phase of this project. The subject traffic studies should include recommetidations for mitigation, iric'Itiding sighalizAtion options for the area. • It is found that the Department of Planning and Zoning is. in concurrence'with these comments (with the exception of a niandatory:review -'of -linal. design by LJDRB, which shall be.at the discretion of the Planning and Zo_ning'Director) and will require compliance with the above referenced -conditions prior to the'issuance of any building permits for the proposed project. • It is found that.with respect to all additional criteria as.specified in Section 1305 of Zoning Ordinance 11000, the proposal has been reviewed and found to be adequate. Based on these findings, the Department of Planning and Zoning is recommending approval of the requested Development Project with the following conditions: 1 The approval of this Major Use Special Permit* shall be subject to the - recordation- of the following documents prior to the issuance of shell permits for the proposed project,: t a.. Unity of Title or covenant in lieu thereof providing that the ownership, operation and maintenance of all common areas and facilities will be by 10 the property - owner or., a mandatory property owner association in perpetuity or completion of the State of Florida condominium process which assures the same compliance. Submitted into the public record in connection vv;th item LS on Walter Foeman 00-1137 b. Development Order specifying that the Development Order runs with the lan 'and is 'binding --on the' Applicant; `iit'successors and 'assigns, jointly or • severally. -. 2. Pursuant to the Department of Public Works, the project requires plans for proposed sidewalk and swale area improvements (including implementation of the Burle Mara plan for Biscayne Boulevard) prior -to the-issuance-oLa -building permit. 3. Pursuant to the Fire and GSA Departments, the roof area of the proposed structure shall be made available to the City of Miami for any necessary communications -equipment at no charge to the City. applicant shall submit a parking plan for construction employees, including an operational plan for construction activity and enforcement; said parking plan shall be subject to the review and approval by the Department of Planning and -_Zoning_priior:to=the issuance of -any building permits. 5. The applicant shall keep the Dade County archeologist apprised of all ground findings, disturbing :activity; based upon his some level of monitoring by a private archeological consultant may be required., -5,. _. Pursuant -to _the :condition from -the UDRB and staff review, the APPLICANT shall :submit final design details, including materials,' dolor schemes, and final landscape . and lighting plan, to the Director of the Panning and Zoning Department for review and approval, prior to the issuance of a building permit; plans shall also include final design and landscape details .for the river and bay walks. 7. Prior to the issuance of a shell permit, the APPLICANT shall submit an interim plan, including a landscape plan, which addresses design details for the land occupying Phase II of this project in the event that the future phase is not developed; said plan shall include a proposed timetable and shall be subject to. review and approval by the Director of the Planning and Zoning Department. 8. The applicant shall conduct updated traffic studies prior to obtaining building permits for each future phase of this project. The subject traffic studies should include recommendations for mitigation, including signalization options for the area. 9. This 4pproval shall also be subject to all additional conditions as specified in the attached Development Order. Submitted into the public record in connection with item on —/ter—oo Walter Foeman 0 0 -113'7 _ COLLEGE SO I • r • • . 7 ` V _ ,sue sn N » - 1 !, s n 1• N �N ` ST r • •D 4 s 4 V 'J A ILL 7 11 N N I f N • M N 11 N 2 ST. /o a W . dot 1It 1♦ l•1• 'a =I N D 7-4 i 1 N = J. 9 is 7 4 1 4 3 1 1 to{1ND W 1 � oils Ia n 1♦ la 1• ,• I Is. Is 14 N 17 1 10 _ • • J m FLAGLER ST. O 00..a, > W CMARTEH ' lue. M .i w 1• is Il w I• N Ii 1• Ii �f`+.7 Q T•♦C71 "tot, ST 00000000000000 00000000 <' • aa lama ♦ 7 t •• i• • a a O v n 1•u Ip n1♦ I 1i N 1• e��d. . ao S T. fg ° N • i • • 14 I• It to • TR. B • i • • W » It 11 10 • • 2 � ♦ 3 MIAMI CONVENTION I a I ♦ a I a i .. to �• • VIP CENTER .ro w >. .• ,. .. �. .. p4` AMENDED BISCAYNE� OULE ARDe WAY a` TRACT 'c' A I B J c Submitted into tiie pLgblIC '. \6000O ' record in c nr�+�= c;,hon with ` _ 400004 0000a 6terai on _ Walter Foeman (,city Clerk BRA ° �\�' BRICKELL KEY ON , C D_� CL.AUGHTON ISLAND SECTION 2 Poi pO �l • , • 3 SECTION 3 TRACT 'E' °e • 0 ° J / 9 TRACT G ftRCEI J' 0 Iy ta1► .•,, ,a � s eRi` ' • � C \k \ o I I TRACT'B' o V n� + /Q ° PARK ��• R .4 13 /• O ♦00/IIOM 1 , S T � D • SECTION 1 TRACT 'A' . , = Nq . , 4 1 NER10 ►' ° °' " 1j' ° TRACT 4 V e. ,� _ 9 _ "s T o 'I O _ p TRACT 'H' V record in gorinection with item 2L--1 on Walter Foeman City Clerk "Ac 00-1114131"1" J-00- 9/20/00 :.,.. - RESOLUTION NO- A RESOLUTION OF THE MIAMI CITY COMMISSION, 'WITH: ATTACHMENTS-, :•APPROVING WITH CONDITIONSI; 1'-,' A 1`- OR..` -,`USE �.S-' PECIAL PZERMIT PURSUANT TO ARTICLES 13 AND 17 OF ZONING ORDINANCE);: WO? ''[-11'0 GO FOR THE ONE MIAMI - PHASE I PROJECT, A PHASED PROJECT TO BE LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY 205. - SOUTH'. RISCAYNE "BOULEVARD.; °hISAMI FLORIDA, TO BE COMPRISED OF NOT MORE -THAN 425 RESIDENTIAL UNITS, ACCESSORY RECREATIONAL SPACE, 623,348 SQUARE FEET OF OFFICE,.._. .,RETAIL `'-.AND -.1- OTHER NONRESIDENTIAL USE AND 1,834 PARKING 'SPACES-; DIRECTING;`TRANSMITTAL= OF THE - HEREIN RESOLUTION; MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND -STATING ':CONCLUSIONS.: .OF LAW; : - PROVIDING FOR BINDING EFFECT; CONTAINING A-.`SEVERABILITY = -CLAUSE. AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. -WHEREAS, on September 7, 2000, the applicant, Lucia Dougherty, Esq., on behalf of The Related Group of Florida and Miami One Centre, LP, (hereinafter referred to as "APPLICANT'') , submitted a complete Application for Major Use Special Permit for the One Miami Phase I Project (hereinafter referred to as "PROJECT'') pursuant to Articles 13 and 17 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, for' the property located at approximately 205 South Biscayne Boulevard, Miami, Florida, as legally described on "Exhibit B ", attached hereto and in', "Exhibit All, the Development Order attached hereto; and ' Submitted into the public record in connection with item on —/V—oo Walter Foeman ('i0 —1 3 `7 hr ('iar'+.. square. :zfaet- ::o£ .::off ice, reta l:, and:: -other nonresidential -,uses and, 1,834 parking space's Section 4. :: The:.:.Major AUse.._Spec al::Permit :Appl cation;:for the PROJECT --also encompasses the'lower'rank ing Special Permits as set forth .in the Development Order, . attached .as "Exhibit A' hereto and incorporated herein. Section 5, .The'.findings of fact -set forth below are hereby made with respect to the subject PROJECT: a. 'The PROJECT is in conformity with- the" -adopted` Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood -Plan 1989=2060;' as amended. - b. The- PROJEOT is in accord with " the -CED Zoning classifications of -Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, the ZoningOrdinance of the City , y of Miami, Florida, as amended. C. Pursuant to Section 1305 of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, 'the specific site plan aspects of the PROJECT, i . e . •, . ingress -and egress,; parking, signs and lighting, utilities, drainage, preservation of natural features and control of potentially adverse effects generally, have been considered and will be further considered administratively during the process of �issuing a building permit and a certificate of occupancy. Submitted into the public record in connection with Page 4 oiftegn 'S on —/Yroa Walter Foeman O 0 _ 1 • ,:,P. ase" PROJEQT_;t,-Is h the, `Nexpected i.. approxiniately -362,mila:on, an ? d employ'. .- -aproxinatelr.45�workes.., durigconstruction py -(FTE) the PROJECT will also result - in the ...creation_of:..toximatlely appr 301permanent,, new., ".. The'° PROJECT,- will, .-: generate approximately-, m,Lll ion,-.., dnnual ly in tax revenues to local units of government (2000 dollars). e. The City Commission furth 1. e . r finds that: 11Y: ---a:. f avorable,.:impact -_:On. . �the PRO--r`---:: will. ithave: .:the economy of "the: City;- .(2)' the 'PROJECT will efficiently use public transportation..facilities;.- (3) any potentially adverse effects of the PROJECT will be_.mitigated thrpugh compliance with the conditions of this Major Use Special Permit; (4) the PROJECT will favorably affect the need for people to find -adequate housing reasonably accessible to their places- of 'employment; (5) the PROJECT will efficiently use necessary public facilities; (6) the PROJECT will not negatively impact the environment and natural resources of the City; Submitted into the public record in connection with Page 5 Aerrh X_=L on 1_2-1cf-00' Walter Foernan ("itv r�inrl( 0 0 113 7 (?).,:...,the. PROJECT will..,-no.t::adversely,:.:af;fec:t. 1<ming.:. coedit ons`:`in- t'he' neighborhood; - (8) the. PROJECT will not adversely affect public safety; (9) based on `-'the`'' record presented and `evdenc`e presented, the.,public welfare. will be served :.PROJECT; and (10) any potentially adverse effects of the PROJECT arising =rom safety and: security, =re protection::and life .safety;; solid waste, "heritage" conservation, trees, shoreline development, minority participation and .employment, _ and minority contractor/subcontractor "participation will be mitigated through compliance with the conditions _of -this Major. Use Special Permit. Section 6. The Major Use"special Permit, as approved and amended, shall be binding_ upon the APPLICANT and any successors in interest.. Section'7'. The application for Major Use Special -Permit, which was submitted on September 7, 2000, and on file with the Department of Planning and Zoning of the City Of -Miami, Florida, shall be relied upon generally for administtative interpretations and is made a part hereof by reference. ' Section 8. The City Manager is hereby directed to instruct the Director of the -Department of Planning and Zoning to transmit a copy -of this .Resolution and attachment Submitted into the public record in connection with Page 6 ofity . Z—S on —IC( -Oa Waiter Foeman to the 00-113'7 „� developers -.IzLuci4: ;Dougherty.,'tF q.;n behalf,Pf -.,The _,Related Group. of Florida. ee ne- ntre, LP, 1221 Brickell Avenue, Miami, F1.'33131,. Sectionf:7.9. The: Findin s,,iof Fact and—C .Conclusions -ofLaw.- , are made with t-h respect tothe'- ---,,as described in the r the Ore Develop,men Order 0 ne- - h'- attached hereto as Exhibit A and made a part hereof by ref erence, d'. seft-ib The Major -Use- Sp'eifiAY=PermitDevelopment Order for the One Miami Phase 'I -Project ("Exhibit A” I) is- hereby.,granted and -issued.. Section Irr the -event-:'that any portion, %or:-sectidn of this Resolution or the Development Order ("Exhibit All) is determinedin valid,- illegal, or unconstitutional by a_ _court or agency of -competent* J urisdiction,, -such 'decision -shall:, in -no - manner affect the remaining portions of this Resolution or Development Order ("Exhibit All) which shall remain in full force and effect. Section 12. The provisions approved for this Major* Use, Special, Permit, as -approved, shall ccmunence and become operative. thirty, (30) days after the adoption of the herein Resolution. Section 13. This Major Use '-Special Permit,_ as approved, shall expire two (2) years from 'its commencement and operative date. -Submitted into the public record in connection velth Page 7 o on Walter Foeman 0 0 - 113 7 sS'ect +on ;14 „- :_This. _tResolu_tion shall; ; -become- -effective immedatjel-y upon -its adoption and signature of the Mayor.I� PASSED ..AND ADOPTED this day of 2000. JOE- :CAROLLO,, ,,MAYOR,,.,.,,.-.-,. ATTEST: :.. WALTER J :, FOEMAN ... .. - - CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: ALEJANDRO VILARELLO CITY ATTORNEY t �i If .thg Mayor does not sign this Resolution,- it shall become effective at the'o endof ten calendar days from the date it was passed and -adopted. If the. Mayor' vetoes this Resolution, it shall become effective immediately upon override of the veto by the City Commission. Submitted into. the public record in connection with - E On Page 8 ojeg Waiter Foeman "EXHIBIT A'' ATTACHMENT TO' -. RESOLUTION NO 00 ---- DATE: ---, 2000 ONE MIAMI - PHASE I PROJECT MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT xl DEVELOPMENT ORDER Let it be known that pursuant to Articles 13 and 17 of Ordinance No. 1100.0,,the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida,, as amended, the Commission of '-the City of Miami, Florida, has considered in a public hearing, the issuance of a Major Use Special- Permit.. for the -One Miami - Phase I ::Project (hereinafter referred to. as the "PROJECT'') to be located at approximately 205 South Biscayne Boulevard, Miami, Florida; see legal description on —Exhibit B'', attached hereto and made'a part hereof; said legal description is subject' to any dedications, limitations, restrictions, reservations or easements of record. After due consideration of the recommendations of the Planning Advisory Board and after due consideration of the consistency of this proposed development with the -Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan, the City Commission has approved the. PROJECT, and subject to the following conditions approves the Major Use Special Permit and hereby issues this Permit: A� Submitted into the public record in connection with Page 1 Z—� on —/yroa Waiter Foeman d -1 1 3'7 • • `Certificate of Appropriateness for ground disturbing activity, in an archeological conservation area (city Code Section 23'5a); .Designation ,as a phased�:lproject-, ...pursuant .to Section_ 2502 of Zoning Ordinance 11000, as amended. Waiver from the City Commission for the following: 1. Noise Ordinance during the required concrete pours for construction of the building (City Code Chapter 36). 2. Waterfront Charter provision 3 (mm) (iii) . Pursuant to Articles 13 and 17 of Zoning Ordinance 11000, approval of the requested Major Use Special. Permit, shall 'be considered sufficient for the subordinate permits requested and referenced above aswell, as any other special approvals required by the City which may be required to carry out the requested plans. The PROJECT shall be constructed substantially in accordance with plans and design schematics on file prepared by Arquitectonica, dated September, 2000; the landscape plan shall be implemented substantially in accordance with plans and design schematics on file prepared by Curtis & Rogers Design Studio, Inc., dated September, 2000; said design and landscape plans may be permitted to be modified only to the extent necessary to comply with the conditions for approval imposed herein; all modificatipns shall be subject to the review and approval of the Director of the Department of Planning and Zoning prior to the issuance of any building permits. Submitted into the public record in connection with Page 4 of*te� Z—� on Walter Foeman 0 0 -113'7 The PROJECT conforms to the requirements of ..the CBD Zoning District, as contained in Ordinance No. 11000, the Zoning Ordinance -of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended. The existing comprehensive plan future land use designation on the subject property allows the proposed mix of residential and commercial uses'.. CONDITIONS THE APPLICANT, ITS SUCCESSORS, AND/OR ASSIGNS, JOINTLY OR SEVERALLY, PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF ANY BUILDING PERMITS, SHALL COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING: 1. Meet all applicable building codes, land development regulations, ordinances and other laws. 2. Pay all applicable fees due prior to the issuance of a building permit. 3. Allow the Miami Police Department to conduct a security survey, at the option of the Department, and to make recommendations concerning security' measures and systems; further submit a report to the Department of Planning and Zoning, prior to commencement of construction, demonstrating how the Police Department recommendations, if any, have been incorporated into the PROJECT security and construction plans, or demonstrate to the Planning Director why such recommendations are impractical. , 4. Obtain approval from, or provide a letter from the Department of Fire -Rescue indicating APPLICANT'S coordination with members of the Fire Plan Review Section at the Department of Fire -Rescue i the review of the scope of �ubmitted into the public record in connection with Page 5 of itym Z-'� on--kw-Od' Walter Fceman 0 0 —113'7 �J the PROJECT, owner responsibility, building.development process and review- ,,procedures, ::as well as specific requirements for fire protection and life safety systems, exiting, vehicular access .and water supply. 5. Obtain'`approval -from, or 'provide a letter of assurance from !the•Depar.tment of Solid Waste that the PROJECT has addressed all .c.oncerns..of the said Department prior to the obtainment of a she permit 6. Prepare a --'Minority Participation and Employment Plan (including a;Contractor/Subcontractor Participation Plan) to be submitted. to the City' s Director of Equal Emplo-1r7!ent Opportunity for review 'and comments, with the understanding 'that -the APPLICANT must use its best efforts to follow the .provisions 'of the City's Minority/Women Business Affairs and Procurement Program as a guide. 7. Record the following in the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, prior to the issuance of a :shell permit: (a) a Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions providing that the ownership, operation and maintenance of all common areas and facilities will be by the property owner or a mandatory property owner association in perpetuity; (b) a certified copy of the development order specifying that the Development Order runs with the land and is bindirig on the APPLICANT, 'its successors, and assigns, jointly or severally. 8. Prior -to the issuance of a shell permit, demonstrate to the City that the PROJECT has either..t(a) completed its condominium requirements and has been approved for such by the State of Florida; or (b) provide the City with an execilt,ed, recordable unity of title or covenant in -lieu of unity of title agreement for the subject property; said Submitted into the public record in connection with on Page 6 oe� Z—S Walter Foeman agreement shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Attorney's Office.. 9. Provide_.,.;the :-:Department ::of Public Works with plans for 21,proposed -sidewalk and swale area improvements (including 'implementation .of "the':--Burle Marx plan for Biscayne Boulevard) for its review and approval prior to the i.ssuance`: of a building permit . 10. Provide the Department of Planning and Zoning with a temporary parking plan, including an operational plan, which addresses construction employee parking during the construction period; said plan shall be subject to the review and approval by the Department of Planning and Zoning prior to the issuance of any building permits and shall be enforced during construction activity. 11. Pursuant to the Departments of Fire -Rescue and General Services Administration, the roof area of the proposed structures shall be made available to the City of Miami for any necessary communications equipment at no charge to the City. 12. The applicant shall keep the Dade County archeologist apprised of all ground disturbing activity; based upon his findings, some level of monitoring- by a _ private archeologigal consultant may be required. 13. Pursuant to the condition from the UDRB and staff design review, the APPLICANT shall submit 'f-inal revised design t details, including materials, color 'schemes, and final landscape and lighting plan, to the Director of the Panning and Zoning Department for review and approval, prior to the issuance of a building permit; plans shall also include Submitted into the public record in connection with Page 7 of it 2�� on Walter Foeman 0 0 _ 113'7 (~ihF (inr':c final design and landscape details for the river and bay • walks. 14. Priorto the issuance of a shell permit, the APPLICANT shall submit an interim plan, including a landscape plan, which addresses design details for the land occupying Phase II of this .project in the event that the future phase is not developed; said plan shall include a proposed timetable and shall be subject to review and approval by the Director of the Planning and Zoning Department. 15. Prior- to the issuance of any building permits for Phase II of this project, the applicant shall conduct updated traffic studies that shall include recommendations for ® mitigation. 3 o Cn Q THE CITY SHALL: yv =CD Establish the operative date of this Permit as being o= thirty (30) days from the date of its issuance; the issuance 0Z� Co date shall constitute the commencement of the thirty (30) N.. � CD' 0 o 0 day period to appeal from the provisions of the Permit. 0 CD It a Cr CONCLUSIONS OF LAW The One Miami - Phase I Project, proposed by the applicant, The Related Group of Florida and Miami One Centre, LP, ("APPLICANT "), complies with the Miami Comprehensive • Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000 g is consistent with the orderly Page 6 of 9 Q0-1137 deve opment .and- :goals... of : the.•. City of Miami, and complies with local land development regulations and further, pursuant to Section 1703' °of '°Zoning Ordinance No; 11000: the PROJECT will have .a favorable impact on the economy the City; and (2) the PROJECT will _efficiently use .public transportation .faci'lit 4s,- .:and (3) the .PROJECT Will favorably affect "the need for people ta::find-adequate ,housing reasonably accessible to their places of employment; and (4). the. PROJECT will efficiently use necessary public facilities; and (5) the PROJECT will not negatively impact the environment and natural resources of the City; and (6)- the PROJECT will .not adversely affect public safety; and (7) the public welfare will be served by the PROJECT; and (8) any potentially adverse effects of the PROJECT. will be mitigated through conditions of this Major Use Special Permit. The proposed development does not unreasonably interfere with the achievement of the objectives of 'the adopted State Land Development Plan applicable -to the City of Miami. Purs6ant to Section 1305,of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, the specific site plan aspects of the PROJECT i.e., ingress and Submitted into .the public record in connection with Page 9 oftep Z�S :on -/Yfoa Walter Foeman 0_ i 3 7 EXHIBIT "C,, . Ol7E /lw7/ff/ "PROJECTDATA 1-''SITE.' LOCATION: 205 SOUTH BISCAYNE BOULEVARD, MIAMI FLORIDA NET LOT AREA 3.04 ACRES 'GROSS LOT'ARE — 4.9 ACRES ZONING! CB0,CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT.COMMERCIAL FLOOR AREA RATIO: UNLIMITED MAXIMUM NUMBER:OF,APARTMENTS :1,500 UNITS (500/ACRE) li- SETBACKS (CITY OF MIAMI) REQUIRED PROPOSED FRONT 5'-0' REAR 0'-0' 0'-0' SIDE 0'-0' BUILDING HEIGHT UNLIMITED 476'-3' CHARTER PROVISION 50'-0' 20'-0' 6o•36'4r III- OPEN SPACE CRITERIA: FAR. — (50,000}/ 50 = (532,421 * 623.348) — 50,000/ 50 = 1,105,769/ 50 TOTAL= 22,115 S.F. - REQUIRED PROPOSED 22,115 S.F. 69,069 S.F. IV- RESIDENTIAL TOWER GROSS AREA :626,552 S.F. ;. FAR. AREA :532,421 S.F. ' NUMBER OF UNITS .425 UNITS NUMBER OF FLOORS :49 HEIGHT AT ROOF :467'-0' N.G.V.D. PARAPET -HEIGHT :518'-0.`N.G.V.D. V- OFFICE TOWER GROSS AREA :707,025 S.F. FAR. AREA :623,348 SY NUMBER OF FLOORS :34 HEIGHT AT ROOF :476'-3' N.G.V.D. PARAPET HEIGHT :513'-7' N.G.V.D. TYP.GROSS FLR. AREA s :22,610 S.F. . VI- PARKING GARAGE NUMBER OF FLOORS ' :12 , OFFICE: , ANCILLIARY USE: CRITERIA:IPKG1500 S.F. OF RENTABLE No. OF PKG.: 600,541 S.FJ 500 S.F. =1,201 PKG. SPACES ANCILLIARY USE: CRITERIA :1 PKG/1,000 S.F. No: OF PKG. :2�972 S.FJ1,000 S.F. = 3 PKG. SPACES TOTAL PKG SPACES =1,204 Submitted into the public record in connection with item ,2—S on Walter Foeman n `' RESIDENTIAL ANCILLIARY USE: CRITERIA No. UNITS @1.3 + 10% VISITORS No. UNITS 425@1.3 = 553+ 10% VISITORS =.596 SPACES ANCILLARY USE:CRITERIA:1 PKW,000 S.F. No. OF PKG. :2,909 S.FJ1,000.S.F. = 3 PKG. SPACES TOTAL PKG SPACES _.599 TOTAL PROVIDED :1,834 SPACES OFFSTREET.LOADING: REQUIRED: PROVIDED {4) BERTH 12'xZ! (4) BERTH`IZx`35' ,(2) BERTH 17x-55'. (2) BERTH 12'x`55' RESIDENTIAL : AREA IFAR- LEVEL AREA No. OF FLOORS SUB -TOTAL GROUND 41377 . 1 4,377 MEZZ • 0 1 0 LEVEL 3 8,606 1 8,606 4,5 & 6 11,447 3 34,341 7,8,9,10,11,12 &13 12,376 7 86,632 POOL 12,376 1 12,376 15,16,17,18,19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26 27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38, 39,40,41 & 42 12,243 28 ; , 342,804 43,44 &45 10,275 3 30,825 46,47 & 48 3,115 3 9,345 49 3,115 1 3,115 TOTAL No. FLOORS = 49 TOTAL 532,421 S.F. OFFICE: AREA IF.A.R. LEVEL AREA No. OF FLOORS - SUB -TOTAL GROUND 9,429 1 9,429 MEZZ - B2 3,992 1 3,992 MEZZ - B3 7,428 1 7,428 MEZZ - B4 11,562 1 11,562 5, 6 , 7 14,113 3 42,339 8,9,10 19,479 3 58,434 11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22 20,162 12 242,028 23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34 20,678 12 248,136 TOTAL No. FLOORS = 34 TOTAL 623,348 S.F. i10 Submitted into the public record in connection with item "-S onf-/�--oa Walter Foeman 0 0_ 1 1 3 7 • • CITY OF MIA.MI -PLANNING -DEPARTMENT . APPLICATION FOR MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT rT IS DrrENDED THAT MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMTS BE REQUIRED WHERE SPECIFIED USES AND/OR OCCUPANCIES INVOLVE MATTE- DEEMED TO BE OF CITYWIDE OR AREA -WIDE DAPORTANCE. THE CITY COMMISSION SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE'FOR DETERMINATIONS ON APPLICATIONS FOR MAJOR USE SPECIAL P—ERMI7 (SEE AR77CLE 17 OF ORDINANCE 11000. AS AMENDED, THE ZOMNG ORDINANCE OF THE CJ7Y OF,lQA.1Q FLORIDA.) THE CITY COMMISSION SHALT. REFER ALL APPLICATIONS FOR MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMITS TO THE PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD AN TO THE DIRECTOR OF THE PL.AMCNG DEPARThgNT FOR RECOMMENDATIONS, AND MAY MAKE REFERRALS TO AGENCIES, BODIES, C OFFICERS,-ErrmER THROUGH _THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT OR DIRECTLY, FOR REVIEW, ANAL YSIS ANDlOR TECHNICAL FINDINGS AN DETERMINATIONS AND REPORTS THEREON. (SEE SEC77ON 1.101.5 OF ORDNANCE 11000. AS A&ZVDED, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF 771 CITY OFMIAMI. FLORID.!.) SECTION 2-653 OF THE CODE OF THE CrN OF MIAMII, FLORIDA, AS AMENDED, GENERALLY REQUIRES ANY PERSON WHO RECEIVE COMPENSATION, REMUNERATION, OR EXPENSES FOR CONDUCTING LOBBYING ACTIVITIES TO REGISTER AS A LOBBYIST WTTH THE CIT: CLERK, PRIOR TO ENGAGING IN LOBBYING ACTIVITIES BEFORE CrrY STAFF, BOARDS, C0W4rIFF•S AND TIM CITY COMMISSION. i COPY OF SAID ORDINANCE IS AVAILABLE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK (Avm CITY HALLS LOCATED AT 3500 PAN AMIRICA? DRIVE, MIAMI, FIARIDA. 33133. ]VOTE. • THIS AP'PLIC9 77ON MUST BE 77PEWR17TEIV AND SIGNED IN BLACK INK I, L u c i- a A. D o u a h e r t y, on behalf o f1hereby apply to the Pirector of the Planning Department of the City of Miami for approval of a Major Use Special Permit under the provisions of Article 17 of the City of Miami Zoning Ordinance. *The ReLa.ted Troup of Florida, contract purchaser and ! iami Property Address: One Centre, L.P. owner ?Q'; Rniit h R-; cra; na Rnrd•ova rr; Nature of proposed use (be specific): A request for an amendment to' a p r-i o r approved Major Use Soecial Permit whirh wA- granreri h:4 t►.Q rir�z Commission orraua to Resolution No. 98-1151. See attached Exhibit "1" for the Zoning Write— D. APPLICATION MATERIALS , I attach the following in support and explanation of the application: Px , 1. Two original surveys, prepared by'a State of Florida Registered Land Surveyor within one year from the date of application. 2. Affidavit disclosing ownership of property covered by application and disclosure of interest form (attach forms 4-83 and 4a-83 to application). Submitted into the public; record in connection vvith item Z--,S' on f--/Y—Oa Walter Fo.-man 0 Q —113 7 Submitted into the public APPLICATION MATEIUA.LS (continued) record in r�nnectian with h the following in support and explanation of the application: item � on -� 2!�f ® Walter Foeman City Clod( �-1 3. Certified list of owners of realestate within a 375-foot radius from the outside boundaries of property (attach form 6-83 to application). s7 4. Maps of the: a) Existing zoning designation. b) Adopted comprehensive plan designation for areas on and around the property. 7 5. General location map showing relation to the site or activity to major streets, schools, existing utilities, shopping areas, important physical features in and adjoining the project, and the like. 6. Concept Plan a) Site plan and relevant information per Section 1304.2.1d-h. b) Relationships to surrounding existing and proposed futures uses and activities, systems and facilities, per Section 17023.2a. c) How concept affects existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan principles and designations; tabulation of any _required, variances, special permits, changes of zoning or exemptions, per Section 1702.3.2b. 1 7. Developmental Impact Study (an application for development approval for a Development of Regional Impact may substitute). • 8. Other (be specific): ? 9. Fee of S 45,000 , for the Major Use Special Permit, based on current fee schedule as set forth in Chapter 62 of the Code of the City of Miami, as amended. 10. Additional fee of $ —0 , for any required special permits, changes of zoning or variances set forth in chapter 62 of the Code of the City of Miami, as amended. )talFee: $ 45,000 Signature ✓ X" / Name Lucia A. Dougherty Address 1221 BrickelL• Avenue, Miami, FL Phone/Fax s o _ n n z,/ Date Santemhar 7. 2000 e •APPROVAL OF THIS APPLICATION FOR MAIOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT SHALL CONSIST OF AN EXECUTED RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COMMISSION AND A DEVELOPMENT ORDER ATTACHED THERETO WHICH SPECIFIES THE CONDITIONS UNDER WHICH THIS USE SPECIAL PERMIT APPLICATION IS APPROVED; IF APPROVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION, SAID RESOLUTION AND LOPMENT ORDER SHALL, UPON EXECUTION THEREOF, BE TRANSMITTED TO THE OWNER OR AUTHORIZED AGENT AT THE )RESS SPECIFIED ABOVE. 46 • STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of September 20 00 - '-,by Lucia A. Dougherty who is personally known to me or who has produced as identification and who did (did not) take an oath. Name: Not �r�_. r. a Co �� .�Q =-:irATEofFWRmA My orri 6;jaa!E ;N%§CMS STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE The foregoirig instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20 , by of a corporation, on behalf of the corporation. He/She is personally known to me or has produced as identification and who did (did not) take an oath. Name: Notary Public -State of Florida Commission No.: My Commission Expires: STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20 , by partner (or agent) on behalf of , a partnership. He/She is personally known to me or who has produced as identification and who did (did not) take an oath. Submitted �i6to the public recor in connection with item on Walter Foeman City Clerk, Name: Notary Public -State of Florida Commission No.: My Commission Expires: 3 QQm117 • Ll CITY OF MIAMI OFFICE'OF`HEARINO- BOARDS APPLfyCATLON f OR :SP,E,CIAL..EXCEPTiON ANY PERSON WHO 'RECEIVES COMPENSATION, RE'41.1_%'=_?1`r1N r7R., 'Cr=VScS FOR CONDUCTING LOBBYING ACTIVITIES TO REGISTER AS A LOBBYIST WiTH THE CITY CLERK, PRIOR TO ENGAGING IN LOBBYING ACTIVITIES BEFORE- CiTY STAFF, -BOARDS, COMMITTEES .AND THE CiTY COMMISSION. A COPY OF SAID ORDINANCE IS AVAILA,BLE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK -(MIAMI'CITY' `HAI!');' LOCATED AT 3500 PAN AMERICAN DRIVE. MIAMi..FLORIDA, 33133. NOTE. THIS'APPLICATiON MUST BE TYPEWRITTEN AND SIGNED IN BLACK INK. IT WILL BE ACCEPTED BY THIS OFFICE ONLY THE FIRST SEVEN (7) DAYS OF THE MONTH. APPLICANTS ARE-RESPONSiBLE,- IF NEEDED, TO BRING AN INTERPRETER FOR THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE TO ANY PRESENTATION BEFORE ANY BOARD OR COMMITTEE AND THE CiTY COMMISSION. Within the City generally, or within certain zoning districts, certain structures, uses, and/or occupancies specified in this ordinance are of a nature requiring special and intensive review to determine whether or not they should be permitted in specific locations, and if so, the special limitations, conditions, and safeguards which should be applied as reasonably necessary .promote the general purposes of this Zoning Ordinance and, in particular, to protect adjoining properties and the neighborhood from avoidable potentially adverse effects. -it is -further intended that the expertise and judgment of the Zoning Board be exercised in making such determinations, in accordance with the rules, 4onsiderations and limitations relating to Special Exceptions (see Article 16 of the Zoning Ordinance). Formal public notice and hearing is mandatory for Special Exceptions. The Zoning Board shall be solely responsible for determinations on applications for. Special Exceptions except when otherwise provided for in the City Code. All applications shall be referred to the Director of the Planning and Zoning Department for his recommendations and the Director shall make any further referrals required by these regulations. Lucia A. Dougherty, on behalf of The Related Group of FLorida, I, contract purchaser and ftiami One Centre, L.P., owner — hereby apply to the City of Miami Zoning Board for approval of a Special Exception for the property located at 205 South Biscayne BouL.evard folio number n1-n114-n,3n-1n41 Nature of proposed use (please be specific): See attached Exhibit "1 in support of this application, the following materials are submitted: t 1. Two original surveys of the property prepared by a State .of Florida Registered Land Surveyor within one year from the date of application. 2. Four copies -signed and sealed by a State of Florida Registered Architect or Engineer of site plans showing (as required) property boundaries, existing (if any) and proposed structure(s), parking, landscaping, etc.; building elevations and dimensions and computations of lot area and building spacing. -Submitted into the public record in connection with item Z—S on Walter Foeman 00 _ 1 3 7 y 3. Plans need to be stampyed .by the Office of _Hearing Boards and signed by Public Works, Zoning and Planning prior to submission of application: 4. One (1) 8 Ya x 11 copy of the signed plans attached to this application. 5.. Affidavit and disclosure of ownership of property covered by applications and disclosure of 'ii terest-from"attached`to'this application. 6. Certified list=of owners: of real estate within a 375-foot radius of the outside boundaries of ~property- covered by the- application. 7. At least two photographs that show the entire property (land and improvements). 8„::Recorded=:warranty. deed and -tax forms .-for-the. most -current year available that show the present owner(s) of the property. Other (Specify and attach cover letters explaining why any document you are attaching is pertinent to this application): 10. Cost of processing according to Section 62-156 of -the Zoning Ordinance: Special exception $ 800.00 Special exception requiring automatic city commission review. $ 2,000.00 Extension of timefor special exception $ 500.00 Public hearing mail notice fees, including cost of handling and mailing per notice $ 3.50 Surcharge equal to applicable fee from item above, not to exceed eight hundred dollars ($800.00) except from agencies of the city; such surcharge to- be refunded to the applicant if there is no appeal from a property owner within three hundred and seventy-five (375) feet of the subject property. Signature Name Lucia A. 'Dougherty. Address 1721 '3r►i c k e L L Avenue Miami, Florida 33131 Telephone (305) 579=0603 Date Seotember 7, 2000 Submitted ' into the public record in connection with 2 item Z-S on —/Y,oe Walter Paeman 00-113'7 DISCLOSURE OF OWNERSHIP 1. L'egaf description and street address of subject real property: 205 South' Biscayne Boulevard w ; See a ttached'Exhibit'2" for -legal description 2. Owner(s) of subject real property' and percentage of ownership. Note: Section 2-618 of the Code of the City of Miami require s'disclosure of all parties having a financial interest, either direct or indirect, in the subjectmatter .of 'a presentation; request or petition to the City Commission. Accordingly, question #2 requires disclosure ofshareholders of corporations, .beneficiaries of trust, and/or any other interested parties, together with their addresses and proportionate interest See attached Exhibit "3'. 3. Legal description and street address of any real property (a) owned by any party listed in answer to question #2, and (b) located within 375 feet of the subject real property. See attached Exhibit 040. Owner or Attorney fo Owner Lucia A. Dougherty STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of✓�- 2000 by Lucia A. Dougherty who is personally known to me or who s produced as identification and who did (did not) take an oath._ Name: Notary P ic-S6p ` i. . sEou. Commis on No\A•»_ .-: r C-0NZALEZ " my �A:E OF FLORIDA My Com mo��cpires.' . - % pro. CC771348 tv1Y.XP.SEPT 17.2002 Submitted into the public record in connection with item —S on Walter Foeman 00-113'7 OWNER'S LIST 'sName Miami one Centre, l.P:` i. ,Address 5000 Blue Lake Drive, #150, Boca Raton, FL 33431 Zip Code ephone Number(561) 998-92ot1 al Description: 'bit;"2" 6W9 Name ling Address __ ____ Zip Code .phone Number; ' al Description: :er's -Name i Description: )ther real estate property owned individually, jointly; or severally (by corporation, partnership or privately) within tet of the subject site is listed as follows: . Street Address Legal Description Street Address Street Address 10 See attached Exhibit "4" Legal Description Legal Description Submitted into the public record in connection with item ' Z�� on LZ=—Lt-oa Walter Foernan 0 0 -113'7 OWNER'S LIST -•'s Name Address Zip Code ephone Numbei ;al Description: �1cant s 6kic4Name The Related Groun of Florida ling Address .1 r0ral Way, Miami , Florida Zip Code . 33145 !phone Number:.. 31 Description: cr's Name ing Address Zip Code . .e Number Description: ther real estate property owned individually, jointly, or severally (by corporation, partnership or privately) within :et of the subject site is listed as follows: Street Address Street Address Street Address Legal Description Legal, Description , Legal Description Submitted into the public record in connection with item Z—s on Walter Foeman 0 0 _ 1 1 3'7 • • AFFIDAVIT Before. me,=.the: undersigned:authority, this. day: personally appeared Lucia A. Dougherty who being by me first duly swom, upon oath, deposes and says: 1. That he/she is the owner, :or the legal.- representative of ;.the ...owner, submitting the accompanying application for a public hearing a's required' by Chapter 55 of the Code. of the City of Miami, Florida, affecting the, real property located'in the "City of Miami, as described and listed on the pages attached' to this 'affidavit and made a part thereof. 2. That all owners which" hefte-, represents, if any, °have given their full and complete permission for him/her to act in his/her behalf for the change or modification of a classification or regulation of zoning as set out in the accompanying petition. 3. That the pages attached hereto and made a part of this affidavit contain the current names . mailing addresses, telephone numbers and legal descriptions for the real property of which he/she is the owner or legal representative. 4. The -facts as represented in the application and documents submitted in conjunction with this affidavit are true and correct. Further Affiant sayeth not. Applicant's, Signatu e STATE OF FLORIDA - COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE The foregoing instrument was ack owledged before me this day of 20 80 , by L_Lt [! co. �• who is ersonally known to me or who has produced as identification and who did (did not) take an oath. , Na :Inc NO. c Not ry f• blir-siak Commission No.: M u�mig}ePp E phespublic record in connection with item Z-s on -/Yroo Walter Foeman 00 -1 1 3'7 M 'bit 1 ONE NIIANU CBD/CENTRAL BUSINESS DMTMCT Per City,Code, Chapter 3(k-! nstrnction Equipment Reqtest for waiver ofn_oise. ordinance while under construction for. continuous pours." Per City code, Chapter 234a, Request fpr a Certificate of Appropriateness 'for ground disturbing aCdWry in an Archeologieal Conservation Area. :MUSP, per Article 17 for, development of 425 residential units. MUSP, per Article 17 for a parking structure of 1834 parking spaces. MUSP, as per,Ardcle 17, for an Increased Development Bonus. Special Exception- w Article 9, Section 917.11, to �*Uaw -valet paridng for restaurant up 50%. of e3dsting off-street parking spaces'. Special Fxceptiiop as per Article 4, section 4019 to allow bar/lounge open to the public within the CBD Disb ict Class 11 Special Permit as per Article 15, Section 1511, for any development between Biscayne Bay and the first dedicated right-of-way. Class 11 Special Permh as per Article 4, Section 401, for temporary construction fence and covered walkway. Class 11 Special permit as per Article 4, Section 401, for development of new construction within the CBD Distrcit. Class 11 Special Permit per Article 9, section 908.9, for development on ]Biscayne Boulevard. Class II Special Permit as per Article 91 Section 908.2, for access from a public street roadway width greater than 25 feet. Class II Special Permit -as per Article 15, Section 1512, waiver of Guides and Standards and guidelines, for 5 feet driveway from property line. Class I Special Permit as per Article 9, Section 915.2, for FAA, clearance letter. Class I Special Permit as per Article 9, Section 906.6, for pool/outdoor recreation area. 10.0 Submitted into the public record in connection with item on Walter Foeman 0 0 —113'7 Oit, r� r� Exhibit " 3 Disclosure of a 'n for Mums One Centre L.P. Miami One-CentreiiL.P. - Owner Miami d—Holdco, Ltd..owns . 33% NLS Miami Partner&owns 33%` 'Nf T 4Z Af;.n A I Coy BFMC Investment, L L C. owns m.585% Miami One Centre,;Inc:' owns 1% 1.00%, Miami One Holdco, Ltd. - is owned .100% by Larry. DeGeorge, individually. NLS Miami Partners - is owned 52.62% by Ned Siegel - and no other parties own 5% or greater. M.L. Stoltz Miami Partners - is owned 100% by -Skip Stoltz, individually. BFMC'Investuient,_L.L.C.- is owned 100% by Barry Florescue, individually. uawt�wr�nnorviiae t�iaoot�.cior�tr3aioo�ss.asrrii i10 Submitted into the public record in connection v,,;th item Z—S on ((ll Walter Foeman 0 `, — 113 7 • The=Related Group of 1;7orild1 w • A Florida :General Partnership.-: General' Partner_. -Related Florida,Ltd. '-Limited Partner - Related General of Florida, Ltd. Related Florida, Ltd. A Florida Limited Partnership Corporation GeneralPartner Related Florida;.Inc.: Limited Partner - Jorge Iva. Perez Relnted Florida, Inc. A Florida Corporation ' Jorge M. Perez - 100% Shareholder Officers: Jorge M. Perez - President Roberto S. Morita • Senior V= President Angel A. Hernandez - Assistant Secretary 2828 Coral Way -.Penthouse Miami, Florida 33145 - (305) 460-9900 50.50a/a 49.50a/a EfqTITY Related General of Florida, Ltd. A Florida Limited Partnership General Partner - RCMP, Inc.. - Limited Partner - The Related Companies, L.P. 99.W/e Officers: . Stephen M. Ross - President James Flood • Executive Vice President + t Susan J. McQuire - Secretary 625 Madison Avenue New York, New York 10022 (2t2) 421-5333 Submitted into the public record in connection with item on -/V-oa Walter Foeman 0 C1-1 3'7 (`,ih! rlnr'r E -bit " Y' RCMP. Inc. 100.00% Related Companies L.P. OFFICERS: Stephen M. Ross, President Michael Brenner, Execudve Vice President Susan McG.ulre, Secretary. lriichAcl J. Wechsler, Treasurer 'Tice Rciated Coait�anies L:P. 1.0gYoGP.. The Relstsed Realty Group,_ Inc 64.7%1A& Stephen M. It,oss 24.5%Ltd. Outside Investors (see attached list) 9,80°/ W, -_' Jorge M Perez = Total 100.000/0 _.. - .. Related Coem;aanies IL-P. ;- Outside Xntvestors Stephen M. Ross Estate of Daniel Ginsberg Susan Snider Donald Ginsberg Deborah Williams Estate of Morris Ginsberg Jorge M. Perez Calmon Ginsberg Trust for Morris Ginsberg Estate for Calraon Ginsburg James Snider 1987M Iris. Tr. Trust for Daniel Ginsberg - Trust for Laurie Rudey Laurie Rudey Trust for Donald Ginsberg ` Rona Jaffe F Trust for Elsie Robinson Louis Weinberg . Andrew Augenblick , r • Submitted into the public record in connection with item Z--S on Waiter Foeman d n —113 1 Cjhr �;1.^fl5( . i'bit 444" Miami One Centre... L. P. :i,S thezownv r fo f- t-he fo`LL,ow-i-n.g�:, J Project Legal 'De-tcriptlon Parcel B All of Block 3, DUPONT PLAZA, according -to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 50, Page 11, of the Public Records -of,:Dade County, Florida. Parcel C Lots 1 through 8, --both inclusive, -Block- 2, DU PONT PLAZA, according to the plat thereof as recorded. in Plat" Book 50, Page 11, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. Parcel D All of Block 4, DU PONT PLAZA 'xarding to the'plat"thereof as recorded in Plat Book 50, Page 11, of the Public RecorL5,c! Dade County, -Florida. Submitted into the public record in connection veith item on 12_1C(,00r Walter Foeman stir f',iprir 0.0-1137 1�'1L UM ONE CBD/CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT. Per City Code, ,Chapter 36 .Construction Equipment Request for waiver.of noise ocdinance,while;under construction for continuous pours. Per City code, Chapter 23-Sa, Request fpr a-Certificate.of Appropriateness: for ground disturbing, activity. in an.arclieologicalConservation .area. MUSP, per Article .17 for:development of 425 residential units.. vIUSP, per Article .17 for. a,parking structure of,1334 parking spaces. p Development�Bonus. vITJSP as per Anc�le 17 for an ;Increased - Special Exception, as Article 9, Section 917.1.2, to allow valet parking for restaurant up 50% of existing off-street parking spaces. Special Exception as.per Article 4, section 401, to allow bar/lounge open to the public within 'the' CBD District, Class II Special Permit as per Article 15, Section 1511, for any development between Biscayne Bay and the first dedicated right-of-way. Class II Special Permit as per Article 4, Section' 401, for. temporary construction fence and covered walkway.. Class II Special Permit as per Article 4, Section 401, for development of new construction within the CBD Distrcit. Class II Special Permit per Article 9-, section 908.9, for development on Biscayne Boulevard. Class II Special Permit as per Article 9, Section 908.2, for access from•a.public street roadway width greater than 25 feet. Class II Special Permit as per Article 15, Section 1512, waiver of Guides and Standards and guidelines, for 5 feet driveway from property line. Class I Special Permit as per Article 9, Section 915.2, for FAA clearance letter. Class I Special Permit as per Article 9, Section 906.6, for pool/outdoor recreation area. Submitted into the public record in connection v,,ith item Z—S' on Walter Foeman 0 0 _ 113 [r� Class I Special Permit as Article 9, Section Section 917.2.1, to allow valet parking for residential and other uses. Class I Special . Permit ',as per 'Article 9, Section - 925.3.8, to '� allow develapment/construction%rental signage. Class .I: Permit. as per Article 9, Section 918.2, for parking and staging of construction during constructioa._ ' ` Class I Permit as per Article .9, Sectionction 920.1, to allow construction trailer. Request for the following ATUSP conditions to be required at time of shell permit instead of at issuance of foundation permit: a. The requirement -to provide a letter of assurance for the -Solid Waste Department; and I I . b. The requirement to record in- the Public Records a Declaration -of Covenants and Restrictions providing that the ownership, operation and maintenance of all common areas and facilities will be by the property owner or a mandatory property owner association; and c. The requirement to -record in the Public.Records a unity of title or covenant in lieu -of unity of title. Designation as a phased development pursuant to Section 2502 of Ordinance No. 11000. Request for waiver of Waterfront Charter permission per sectioq,3(mm) (iii) of the Charter. awo, . "44& yA McPhee Zoning Inspector H Date Submitted into the public record in connection with item on —/v—oQ Walter Foeman 'itV (`f,sr� 00-113'7 • one- AMP I I PROJECT DATA I- SITE LOCATION: 205 SOUTH BISCAYNE 60ULEVARO; MIAMI.IFLORIDA NET LOT AREA:1.04 ACRES GROSS LOT AREA: 4.9 ACRES ZONING: CBD CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT:COMMERCIA_L . FLOOR AREA RATIQ: UNLIMITED, . MAXIMUM NUMBER OF,APARTMENTS :1,500 UNITS (500/ACRE) _ U- SETBACKS (CITY OF M1AMI1 REWIRED PROPOSED FRONT S-0' 5'-0' 0'-0' 0'-0' , REAR .. - SIDE 0'-0' 0'-0' BUILDING HEIGHT UNLIMITED -476'-3' i CHARTER PROVISION - 50'-0' 20'4' 6o 36'-8' III- OPEN SPACE CRITERIA FAR.-,(50,000)/ 50 = (532,421 + 623,348) — 50,000/ 50 = 1,105,769/ 50 TOTAL = 22,115 S.F. REQUIRED PROPOSED 4,1-15 S.F. 69,069 S.F. IV- RESIDENTIAL TOWER GROSS AREA :626,552 S.F. FAR. AREA :532,421 S.F. NUMBER OF UNITS :425 UNITS NUMBER OF FLOORS :49 HEIGHT AT ROOF :467'-0' N.G.V.D. PARAPET HEIGHT :518'-O' N.G.V.D. V- OFFICE TOWER GROSS AREA :707,025 S.F. FAR. AREA :623,348 SY NUMBER OF FLOORS :34 HEIGHT AT ROOF :476'-3' N.G.V.D. PARAPET HEIGHT :513'-7' N.G.V.D. TYP.GROSS FLR. AREA :22,610 S.F. VI- PARKING GARAGE NUMBER OF FLOORS :12 OFFICE: ANCILLIARY USE:. CRITERIA:1 PKGJ500 S.F. OF RENTABLE No. OF PKG.: 600,541 SYJ 500 S.F. =1,201 PKG. SPACES ANCILLIARY USE: CRITERIA :1 PKG/1,000 S.F. No. OF PKG.:2,972 S.F./1,000 S.F. = 3 PKG. SPACES TOTAL PKG SPACES -1,204 Submitted into the public record in connection with item Z—S on —/Y--oa Walter'Foeman 00-113'7 • RESIDENTIAL ANCILLIARY USE:.."CRITERIA No. UNITS @1:3 + I'd VISITORS No. UNITS 425Q1.3 = 553 +`10% VISITORS`596 SPACES ANCILLARY USE:CRITERIA:1 PKG/1,0W S.F. No. OF P0.:2,909•S.FJ1-1000 S.F. =.3 M.-SPACES TOTAL PKG SPACES = 599 TOTAL PROVIDED :1,834 SPACES OFFSTREET LOADING: REQUIRED:. PROVIDED.: _ (4) BERTH 12'x 35' (4) BERTH 12'x 35'- (2) BERTH 12'x 55' (2) BERTH 12'x 55' RESIDENTIAL: AREA IFAR LEVEL AREA GROUND 4,377 MEZZ . p LEVEL 3 8,606 4.5 & 6 11,447 7,8,9,10,11,12 &13 12,376 POOL 12,376 15,16,17,18,19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26 27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38, 39,40,41 & 42 12,243 43,44 &45 10,275 46,47 & 48 3,115 49 3,115 TOTAL No. FLOORS = 49 OFFICE: AREA IF.A.R. No. OF FLOORS SUB -TO 1 4;377 1 p 1 8,606 3 _ 34,341 7 86,632 1 12,376 28 342,804 3 30,825 3 9,345 1 3,115 TOTAL 532,421 S.F. LEVEL AREA No. OF FLOORS - SUB -TOTAL GROUND 9,429 1 9,429 MEZZ - B2 3,992 1 3,992 MEZZ - B3 7,428 1 7,428 MEZZ - B4 11,562 1 11,562 5, 6 , 7 14,113 3 42,339 8,9,10 19,479 3 58,434 11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22 20,162 12 242,028 23.24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34 20,678 12 248,136 TOTAL No. FLOORS = 34 TOTAL 623,348 S.F. Submitted into the public record in connection with item on -/V-oa Walter Foeman 0 0 -1 1 3'7 Submittj�,o i�tto the • record In Public confection ONE MIAMI AMENDMENT TO T 4n withMAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT �dlter Foe an I. Section 1304.1.1 Application Forms; Supplementary Materials. City Clerk (a) Statements of ownership and control of the proposed development activity. The Disclosure of Ownership and Ownership Affidavit are provided in Article (b) Statement describing in detail the direction and intended use of the development or activity. One Miami represents the first new commercial and residential development in downtown Miami, north of the Miami River, in many years. The project is being designed by the acclaimed architectural firm of Arquitectonica. One Miami will be a landmark project for the city and at its -completion, it will become the Beacon for a revised downtown. New jobs and work opportunities will be created as a result of this project. And very importantly, the project v4H create an outstanding pedestrian and waterfront experience • along the Bayfront in a pleasant and safe environment. The property is located at 205 South Biscayne Boulevard, Miami, Florida, also known as One Miami Parcel "A". The project will be named "One Miami". It will consist of a 34-story, 707,025 gross square foot office tower and a 49-story, 425 unit, 626,552 gross square foot multi -family residential tower with related amenities. The site is a 3.04 net acre parcel (4.89 gross acres) on the north side of the Miami River at the confluence with Biscayne Bay. The unique location makes this site one of Miami's most visible and impressive. The 34-story office tower is located at the West Side of the site, with a two- story lobby starting from Biscayne Boulevard and ending with a circular drop- off at the East Side, facing the water. The lobby will offer access to a restaurant as well as other ancillary retail stores. Floors 2 to 5 include the technical (MEP) and office service spaces and secured parking area. The typical office floor plan is abut 22,610 square feet and is served by two groups of elevators, one for the low-rise floor, and the other'for the high-rise floors. The south elevation is designed as a smooth curve, reinforcing the water vyews. The building top (parapet wall) will conceal the cooling towers and elevator overruns. Both the base and top of the office tower form a parallelogram designed to provide a dynamic movement. The skin of the building is silver metallic combined with reflective blue-green glass and blue 00-113 7 1 0 • metallic panels. The service areas, all located within the building, provides storage, receiving, loading and FPL transformer vaults and are located behind the lobby and in the ground floor parking area. The residential tower is located on the East Side of the property. The ground floor includes the lobby 2.nd auxiliary use (shop, food service) and technical gprv;r P (m,-, ,nir iI pl Pr`triral �nra nit�m�+inn� c—cee. `-� building is -rr....J. 1u. composed of an elongated 45-story volume and a tower of 49 stories at the east -end. There are 1 to 3 bedroom apartments of varying size. The lower 13 stories are connected with the adjacent parking garage structure. Valet parking will be available to tenants and patrons of the building. In order to maximize privacy, the building includes three cores of two rapid elevators each serving from two to four apartments. Every apartment offers a bay and/or river view. The majority of units have cross ventilation. The structure is concrete and masonry block, the exterior skin is stucco, painted in aqua colds (blues and greens). The east volume tower is designed to directionally express the development towards the water. The top deck of the parking garage includes garden, a fitness club with two tennis courts and an "infinity" type swimming pool. A lap pool, spa and party room are located on the ground floor. A public cafe will be located at the north east corher. A 20 foot wide baywalk pedestrianwalkway along the ® entire 950 foot water side property line, for a total of 19,000 square feet will be used as a public area. The walkway 4yill include landscaping, design pavers, sitting and viewing area. Tall palm trees, and other plantings, will punctuate the edge of the shoreline in order to soften the perception of the water's edge, and maintain a typical Miami atmosphere. The docking walkway proposed at the edge of the pedestrian walkway, at the lower level n?-I.3 a) C:) will further emphasize the marine character of the design. 0 u- N u The 12-story parking garage will include approximately 1,800 parking spaces o a o U and four 12 foot by 35 foot loading areas and two 12 foot by 55 foot loading c 0 spaces. The primary entry for tenants and guests to the building will be through the two entries located on the vehicular street along the river. �. Service access and express exit at rush hour will be via Biscayne Boulevard. o Security control between office and residential parking occurs at every can parking floor. The ground floor of the garage will, be used exclusively for service and valet parking. , Vehicular access to One Miami from the north will be from Biscayne Boulevard, from the south from Brickell Avenue and from the west from the Ir95 exit ramp. Valet and self -parking will be available on site. Vehicular access for the project will be from Biscayne Boulevard through the vehicular street 'parallel to the Miami River. Circular drop-off for each tower ®®-113 d 2 (c) will facilitate traffic flow and- access to the main lobby) entrances." The parking garage' is _also accessed from this vehicular circulation: one 4-lane entry for upper levels and a second 2-lane entry for valet parking on ground floor. The service access"for both towers will be off Biscaynd"Elodlevard, on the north side of the property. 'One of the two'lanes will` -be used'as the parking garage's express•exit during rush hour. ' One Marru willalsobe accessed bypedestrians from downtown Miami along the Bayfront walk and the BrickeIl Avenue area, as well as by boat from the Miami River or Biscayne Bay. The plaza surrounding the Propertywill create a pedestrian friendly urban environment and will become the core 'amenity for the project and natural, extension of the Bayfront experience. Pedestrian traffic for -the project is primarily accomplished by the wide pedestrian walkway along the Miami River and Biscayne Bay, which is separated from vehicular traffic, but connected with the buildings at several points. This pedestrian walkway will include a focal element and destination at the west end (Biscayne Boulevard) -and also a destination and "view place" at. the southeast comer. Secondary pedestrian traffic is also provided along the vehicular circulation on the buildings' side. The 13`h level of the parking garage building will serve as a recreation deck for the development and will include indoor and ogtdoor amenities. The indoor recreational facilities will include: exercise rooms, spa, Jacuzzi, lockers, bathrooms and showers. Exterior facilities will include a pool, two tennis courts, garden and sun deck. There will also be a cafe and bar, as well as a garden and trellis covered pergola. Thus, creating the atmosphere of a courtyard for .the use of the office tenants and residents. Drawings showing the architectural character and location of the intended uses are included under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. pedestrian linkage and waterfront experience in a pleasant and safe environment. General location map, showing relation of the jite or activity for which special permit is sought to major streets, schools, existing utilities, shipping areas, important physical features in and adjoining the project or activity and the like. The following exhibits are included with the Major Use Special Permit Application: Submitted into the public • record in connection with item ,2L- on 12-=/4-ffoe 3 Waiter Foeman OQ-113"7 (1) Aerial: Aerial photograph of the surrounding area indicating the project site. (2)' `Area Context'Map/Site _Aerial: � Map of the :project area indicating buildings=and their ffunctions'that surround the.site. .= (3) Location Map: Map of the surrounding street system indicating the project location. (d) A site plan containing the title of the project and the names of the projcct planner and developer, date, and north arrow and, based on an exact survey of the property drawn to a scale of sufficient size to show. The general information requested is shown on the Overall Plans Sheets Al.1 to Al.13 provided under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. The site plan includes the following: . L. -Boundaries of the project, any existing streets, buildings, watercourses, easements and section lines. The boundaries of the project and the location of existing streets and casements are shown on the Survey located under Tab 5 of the Supporting Documents. 2. Exact location of all buildings and structures. The property is vacant and has no buildings as shown on the Boundary Survey under Tab 5. The location of the building to the constructed is shown on the Site Plan Al.I and the Ground Floor Plan sheet A1.2 located under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. 3. Access; and traffic flow and how vehicular traffic will be separated from pedestrian and other types of traffic. Vehicular access to One Miami from .the north will be from Biscayne Boulevard, from the south from Brickell Avenue and from the west from the I-95 exit ramp. Valet and self parking will be available on site. Vehicular access for the project will be from Biscayne Boulevard through the vehicular street parallel to the. Miami River. Circular drop-off for each tower will facilitate traffic flow and access to the main lobby entrances. The parking garage is also accessed from this vehicular circulation: one 4-lane Submitted into the public record in connection with item on - /v-oa 4 Walter Fireman 00 entry for upper levels and a second 2-lane entry for valet parking on ground floor. The service access for both towers will be off Biscayne Boulevard, on the north side of the property. One of the two lanes will be used as the parking garage's express exit during rush hour. One Miami will also be accessed by pedestrians from downtown Miami and the Brickell Avenue area, as well as by boat from the Miami River or Biscayne Bay. The plaza surrounding the Property will create a pedestrian friendly urban environment. Pedestrian traffic, for the project is primarily accomplished by the wide pedestrian walkway along the Miami River and Biscayne Bay, which is separated from vehicular traffic but connected with the buildings at several points. This pedestrian walkway will include a "siting place" at the west end (Biscayne Boulevard) and a "view place" at the southeast corner. Secondary pedestrian traffic is also provided along the vehicular circulation on the buildings' side. A detailed, anaylsis of the site access and traffic flow is provided in the Traffic Impact Analysis located under Tab 2 of the Supporting Document, 4. 1Off-street parking and off-street loading areas.; The off street parking facility is located within the parking garage levels ground floor through 12`h floor. The parking structure will have 1,834 parking spaces, which will support the entire development. The garage is shown on Sheets Al. la to A1.6a provided under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. The Zoning Ordinance requires six loading bays, (4) 12' x 35' and (2) 12 x 55', all provided on the Ground/Floor Plan, Sheet A1.2, under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. 5. Recreational facilities locations. The 13"' level of the parking garage building will serve as a recreation deck for the development and will include indoor and outdoor amenities. The indoor recreational facilities will include: exercise rooms, spa, Jacuzzi, lockers; bathrooms and showers. Exterior facilities will include a pool, two tennis courts, garden and sun deck. There will also be a cafe and bar, as well as a garden and trellis covered pergola. Thus, creating the atmosphere of a courtyard for the use of the. office tenants and residents. Submitted into the public record in connection vvith item 2LL on -14Y-0c 5 Walter Foerran 0 0 _ 113 7 These facilities are shown on the architectural Plan A1.7 and on the Landscape Plans under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. 6 Screens and buffers. Along Brickell Avenue and One Miami Street trees will create a soft edge to t Le project. Landscaped areas are indicated on the Architectural and Landscape Plans located under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. 7. Refuse collections areas. Waste collection willbe provided by a containerized compactor system located within the service area in the building. In addition, the project will have a high rise recycling system for the residential units. These facilities are shown on the architectural Plan, Sheet A1.2 located under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. 8. Access to utilities and points of utilities hookups. Access and connections to site utilities ' are discussed in the Site Utility Study located under Tab 3 of the Supporting Documents. (e) Tabulations of total gross acreage in the project and the percentages thereof proposed to be devoted to; 1. The various permitted uses. Building area 42.3%, of gross lot area (footprint 90,495 S.F.) Open area; plazas, exterior courts and streets: 41,927 S.F. 31.6% of net lot area 2. Ground coverage by structures Ground coverage by the structures is 460/. of the total gross lot area. (f) Tabulation showing the following: ' 1. The derivation of numbers of off-street parking and off-street loading spaces shown in (d) above. Submitted into the public record in connection with item on 6 Walter Foeman 00 —113 7 (`;„ �;,nrfr 2. The landscape plans showing vegetation are found on the Landscape Plan, Sheets LLI, L1.2, & L2. All landscape plans are located under tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (1) Plans for recreation facilities, if any, including location and general description of buildings for such use. The 13`s level of the parking garage will serve as a pool and recreational deck for.the residential units and members for the'Health Club. A garden area at the lobby level will provide a visual accent for the lobby. Exterior facilities will include a swimming pool, tennis court, garden and sun decks, with trellis and pAvilion structure. On the 13'' level, a health spa will adjoin the pool deck and include a fitness center,. spa, steam and sauna rooms, and Jacuzzi with access to the sun decks. The health spa and recreational facilities will be for use of residents and members. (m) ' Such additional data maps, plans, or statements as may be required for the particular use or activity involved. The details of the spaces and calculations used to compute the Floor Area Ratio (FAR) are shown on the ALL Plan prodded under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (n) Such additional data as the applicant may believe is pertinent to the proper consideration of the site and development plan. Sections and elevations depicting the architectural character of the building are shown on the Architectural Drawings. Sheets A1.10, A1.11, Al.12 through A2.9, A3.12, A3.13, A3.14. All elevations and sections are located under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. Section 1702.2.1 General Report. (a) Property ownership and beneficial interest within the boundaries of the area proposed for Major Use Special Permit. t Statement of Ownership and beneficial interest within the boundaries of the area proposed for Major Use Special Permit are provided in Article 1. (b) �' The nature of the unified interest or control. The nature ofucufied interest.or contr@l I * #Y44 le boic record in connection meth item L:�� on t2-1`(-oa ry 8 Waiter Foeman 0 0 _ 113 l (c) , (d) (e) M Survey of the proposed area showing property lines and ownership. A copy of the Survey is included under Tab 5 of the Supporting Documents. Map of existing features, including streets, alleys, easements, utilities lines, existing land use, general topography, and physical features. The existing site features and utility lines are shown on the Boundary Survey of the property located under Tab 5. The site features and the utilities are also described in the Site Utility Study, located under a Tab 3 of the Supporting Documents. Materials to demonstrate the relationship of the elements listed in (4) preceding to surrounding area characteristics. The Drawings submitted with this Application are located under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. Existing,zoning and adopted comprehensive plan designations for the area on and around the lands proposed for Major Use Special Permit. The zoning designation for the property pursuant to City of Miami Ordinance No. 11000 and Page 36 of the Zoning Atlas Map which is located in Article I, indicates the existing and surrounding zoning designations. The zoning designation for the Property is CBD, Central Business District. The comprehensive plan future land use designation for the Property is Commercial Business District. The zoning and the comprehensive plan designations are consistent with one another. 3. Section 1702.2.2 Major Use Special Permit Concept Plan. (a) Relatiopships of the concept plan to surrounding existing and proposed future uses, activities, systems, and facilities (transportation, recreation, view corridors, pedestrian systems, service systems and similar uses). I Article II contains a written narrative of this project outlining proposed uses and activities. This narrative also contains descriptions of the project's relationship to traffic, pedestrian movements, and transportation access. The list of drawings submitted .is found under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. Submitted into the public • record in connection vvith item LLL on—14(,0a 9 Walter Foeman Q _ 1 37 s (b) Existing Zoning and adopted comprehensive plan principles and designations. This project conforms with the CBD, Central Business District zoning district designation for the Property. The comprehensive plan future land use designation conforms with the land use designation currently in effect for the Property. 4. Section 1702.2.3 Development Impact Study. (a) A traffic analysis shall be submitted for an area within approximately V4 mile of the site, or an area including the major intersections to be impacted by the site, whichever is larger. The Traffic Impact analysis is included under Tab 2 of the Supporting Documents. '(b). Economic Impact data shall be provided, including estimates for construction costs, construction employment, and permanent employment and shall demonstrate that the proposed development is favorable to the economy, public services, environment and housing supply otthe City. The Economic Impact Study is included under Tair 4 of the Supporting Documents. (c) A housing Impact assessment. There will be 425 residential units within the development. The units will be affordable to middle and upper income individuals. (d) A description of proposed energy conservation, measures shall be provided, including only those measures that are proposed in addition to the minimum requirements in State Energy Code.' Architecturally, the office building envelope will be comprised of reflected tinted glass, metal panels and the roof. The residential building envelope will be masonry walls with stucco and tinted glass. All exterior and landscape lighting will be controlled by means of time clocks and photocell switches. Energy saving lamps, ballasts and fixtures are being considered at cores and public spaces. (e) " 'Historic Buildings There are'no-historic structures locatAS�9flfbt'ythe public record in connection veith item Z— on s��/yfoa 10 Walter Foeman Oity r',!L?6 00-113'7 (� Environmental Zone The Property is not located within an environmental preservation district. The Property is located within the Archaeological Conservation Area. I a ' Submitted into the public record in connection with item Z—S on 11 Waiter Foeman 0 0 _ 113 "7