Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutR-00-1036J-00-857 11/16/00 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE MIAMI CITY COMMISSION, WITH ATTACHMENTS, APPROVING WITH CONDITIONS, A MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT PURSUANT TO ARTICLES 5, 13 AND 17 OF ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 11000, FOR THE PARK PLACE AT BRICKELL PROJECT, A PHASED PROJECT TO BE. LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF BRICKELL AVENUE AND SOUTHEAST 15TH ROAD, MIAMI, FLORIDA, TO BE COMPRISED OF NOT MORE THAN 840 RESIDENTIAL UNITS, ACCESSORY RECREATIONAL SPACE, 22,823 SQUARE FEET OF RETAIL AND OTHER NONRESIDENTIAL USE AND 1,224 PARKING SPACES; DIRECTING TRANSMITTAL OF THE HEREIN RESOLUTION; MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATING CONCLUSIONS OF LAW; PROVIDING FOR BINDING EFFECT; CONTAINING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, on June 7, 2000, the applicant, Park Place, LLC, (hereinafter referred to as the "APPLICANT"), submitted a complete Application for a Major Use Special Permit for the Park Place at Brickell Project (hereinafter, referred to as the "PROJECT") pursuant to Articles 5, 13 and 17 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, for the property located at approximately the northwest corner of Brickell Avenue and Southeast 15th Road, Miami, Florida, as legally described on "Exhibit B", attached Qom` �Jd C N 7 A I N CITY COMUSSION NEETINC OF NOV 1 6 2000 hereto and in "Exhibit A", the Development Order attached hereto and made a part hereof -by reference; and WHEREAS, development of the PROJECT requires the issuance of a Major Use Special Permit pursuant to Article 17 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended; and WHEREAS, the Large Scale Development Committee met on May 24, 2000, to consider the proposed PROJECT and. offer its input; and WHEREAS, the APPLICANT has modified the proposed PROJECT to address the expressed technical concerns raised at said Large Scale Development Committee meeting; and WHEREAS, the Urban Development Review Board met on July 12, 2000 to consider the proposed PROJECT and recommended approval, with conditions as specified in the attached Development Order of the PROJECT; and WHEREAS, the City of Miami Zoning Board, at its meeting held on September 11, 2000, Item No. 6, following an advertised public hearing, adopted Resolution No. ZB 2000-0353 by a vote of nine to zero (9-0), RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of the Major Use Special Permit Development Order as set forth in "Exhibit A", attached hereto and made a part hereof; and WHEREAS, the Miami Planning Advisory Board, at its meeting held on September 20, 2000, Item No. 3, following an advertised Page 2 of 8 — .�. ki � 3 6 • public hearing, adopted Resolution No. PAB 45-00 by a vote of five to one (5-1), RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of the Major Use Special Permit Development Order with conditions as specified by City staff; and WHEREAS, the City Commission deems it advisable and in the best interest of the general welfare of the City of Miami to issue a Major Use Special Permit Development Order as hereinafter set forth; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. The recitals and findings contained in the Preamble to this Resolution are hereby adopted by reference and incorporated as if fully set forth in this Section. Section 2. A Major Use Special Permit Development Order, attached hereto as "Exhibit A" and made a part hereof, is hereby approved subject to the conditions specified in said Development Order, per Article 17 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, for the Park Place at Brickell Project (hereinafter referred to as the "PROJECT") to be developed by Park Place, LLC, ("APPLICANT"), at approximately the northwest corner of Brickell Avenue and Southeast 15th Road,. Miami, Florida, more particularly described on "Exhibit B", attached hereto and made a part hereof. Page 3 of 8 , 1 Section 3. The PROJECT is hereby approved as a phased development for the construction of up to 840 residential units, with accessory recreational space, 22,823 square feet of retail and other nonresidential uses and 1,224 parking spaces. Section 4. The Major Use Special Permit Application for the PROJECT also encompasses the lower ranking Special Permits as set forth in the Development Order, attached as "Exhibit All hereto and incorporated herein. Section 5. The findings of fact set forth below are hereby made with respect to the subject PROJECT: a. The PROJECT is in conformity with the adopted Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000, as amended. b. The PROJECT is in accord with the SD-5 Zoning classifications of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended. C. Pursuant to Section 1305 of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, the specific site plan aspects of the PROJECT, i.e., ingress and egress, parking, signs and lighting, utilities, drainage, preservation of natural features and control of potentially adverse effects generally, have been considered and will be further Page 4 of 8.. • considered administratively during the process of issuing a building permit and a certificate of occupancy. d. Phase I of the PROJECT is expected to cost approximately $243 million, and to employ approximately 375 workers during construction (FTE); the PROJECT will also result in the creation of approximately 160 permanent new jobs. The PROJECT will generate approximately . $3.3 million annually in tax revenues to local units of government (2000 dollars). e. The City Commission further finds that: (1) The PROJECT will have a favorable impact on the economy of the City; (2) The PROJECT will efficiently use public transportation facilities; (3) Any potentially adverse effects of the PROJECT will be mitigated through compliance with the conditions of this Major Use Special Permit; (4) The PROJECT will favorably affect the need for people to find adequate housing reasonably accessible to their places of employment; (5) The PROJECT will efficiently use necessary public facilities; Page 5 of 8 .� (6) The PROJECT will not negatively impact the environment and natural resources of the City of Miami; (7) The PROJECT will not adversely affect living conditions in the neighborhood; (8) The PROJECT will not adversely affect- public safety; (9) Based on the record presented and evidence presented, the public welfare will be served by the PROJECT; and (10) Any potentially adverse effects of the PROJECT arising from safety and security, fire protection and life safety, solid waste, heritage conservation, trees, shoreline development, minority participation and employment, and minority contractor/subcontractor participation will be mitigated through compliance with the conditions of this Major Use Special Permit. Section 6. The Major Use Special Permit, as approved and amended, shall be binding upon the APPLICANT and any successors in interest. Section 7. The application for Major Use Special Permit, which was submitted on June 7, 2000, and on file with Page 6 of 8 l 3 the Department of Planning and Zoning of the City of Miami, Florida, shall be relied upon generally for administrative interpretations and is made a part hereof by reference. Section 8. The City Manager is hereby directed to instruct the Director of the Department of Planning and Zoning to transmit a copy of this Resolution and attachments to the developers: Adrienne Pardo, Esq. on behalf of Park Place, LLC, 1221 Brickell Avenue, Miami, FL 33131. Section 9. The Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law are made with respect to the PROJECT as described in the Development Order for the Park Place at Brickell Project, which is attached hereto as "Exhibit A". Section 10. The Major Use Special Permit Development Order for the Park Place at Brickell Project ("Exhibit A") is hereby granted and issued. Section 11. In the event that any portion or section of this Resolution or the Development Order ("Exhibit A") is determined to be invalid, illegal, or unconstitutional by a court or agency of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall in no manner affect the remaining portions of this Resolution or Development Order ("Exhibit A") which shall remain in full force and effect. Page 7 of 8 ill fA ' n of • Section 12. The provisions approved for this Major Use Special Permit, as approved, shall commence and become operative thirty (30) days after the adoption of the herein Resolution. Section 13. This Major Use Special Permit, as approved, shall expire two (2) years from its commencement and operative date. Section 14. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its adoption and signature of the Mayor.'/ PASSED AND ADOPTED this 16th day of November , 2000. JOE CAROLLO, MAYOR In accordance with Miami Code Sec. 2-36, since the Mayor did not indicate approval of this legislation by signing it in the designated place ¢ovidwd, said legislat'"• `. becomes effective with the elapse of ten (1 days fr the ate of CommisF c -�n ATTEST: regarding same, without the Mayf"er sing - ve WALTER J. FOEMAN, CITY CLERK CTNESS tl VL W4731. MM.mea:BSS r J. Foe •j—a4ity Clerk 1� If the Mayor does not sign this Resolution, it shall become effective at the end of ten calendar days from the date it was passed and adopted. If the Mayor vetoes this Resolution, it shall become effective immediately upon override of the veto by the City Commission. Page 8 of 8 �. —; ,�i .o 0 "EXHIBIT A" ATTACHMENT TO RESOLUTION NO. 00- DATE: PARK PLACE AT BRICKELL PROJECT MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT DEVELOPMENT ORDER Let it be known that pursuant to Articles 5, 13 and 17 of Ordinance No. 11000, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended, the Commission of the City of Miami, Florida, has considered in a public hearing, the issuance of a Major Use Special Permit for the Park Place at Brickell Project (hereinafter referred to as the "PROJECT") to be located at approximately the northwest intersection of Brickell Avenue and SE 15th Road, Miami, Florida; see legal description on "Exhibit B", attached hereto and made a part hereof; said legal description is subject to any dedications, limitations, restrictions, reservations or easements of record. After due consideration of the recommendations of the Planning Advisory Board and after due consideration of the consistency of this proposed development with the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan, the City Commission has approved the PROJECT, Page 1 of, 12 ;] . 4 M1nilv'id �� and subject to the following conditions approves the Major Use Special Permit and hereby issues this Permit: FINDINGS OF FACT PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The proposed Park Place at Brickell Project is a residential/mixed use development to be located at approximately the northwest intersection of Brickell Avenue and SE 15th Road, Miami, Florida; ("PROJECT"). The PROJECT is located on a gross lot area of approximately 5.06 acres and a net lot area of approximately 3.6 acres of land (more specifically described on "Exhibit B", incorporated herein by reference). The Concept Plan for the PROJECT is attached hereto as "EXHIBIT C", and incorporated herein by reference. The proposed PROJECT will consist of no more than 840 residential units with accessory recreational space, 22,823 square feet of retail and other nonresidential uses. The PROJECT will also provide a total of 1,224 parking spaces. The ownership, operation and maintenance of common areas and facilities will be by the property owner or (in the case of the property being converted to condominiums) a mandatory property owner association in perpetuity pursuant to a recorded Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions. Page 2 of 12 The Major Use Special Permit Application for the Park Place at Brickell Project also encompasses the following lower ranking Special Permits and Variance: CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 906.6 for active recreational facilities (including a swimming pool); CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT to permit staging and parking during construction (to be approved prior to the issuance of a building permit; CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT for Development Signs when combined with construction signs; CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 917.2.1 to allow valet parking for residential use; CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Section 915.2 for FAA clearance letter; CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 6, Section 605.3.1 for development of new construction within the Special District; CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 6, Section 605.3.1 for a temporary construction fence and covered walkway; CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 6, Section 605.3.1 for a temporary construction trailer; CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 15 for uniform signage guides and standards; Page 3 of 12 1 U CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 15 for waiver of certain pedestrian pathway requirements; CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Section 908.2 for access from a public street or roadway width greater than 25 feet; CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 923 for reduction in loading berth dimensions (as specified in the application); Special Exception as per Article 6, Sec. 605 to allow bar/lounge open to the public within the SD-5 District; Special Exception as per Article 9, Sec. 917.1.2 to allow valet parking for restaurant up to 500 of existing off- street parking spaces; Variance pursuant to Zoning Ordinance 11000, as amended, Article 6, Section 605, for one ground level setback requested along the interior yard (adjacent to the existing alleyway) reduced from the required 15'-0" to 6'-6"; Variance pursuant to Zoning Ordinance 11000, as amended, Article 6, Section 605, for one ground level setback requested along the north interior yard reduced from the required 15'-0" to 3;" Certificate of Appropriateness for ground disturbing activity in an archeological conservation area (City Code Section 23-5a); Page 4 of 12 x • • Reservation of' Downtown Development of Regional Impact (DRI) credits (City Code Chapter 13); Designation as a phased project, pursuant to Section 2502 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, as amended. waiver from the City Commission for the following: 1. Noise Ordinance during the required concrete pours for construction of the building (City Code Chapter 36). Pursuant to Articles 13 and 17 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, approval of the requested Major Use Special Permit shall be considered sufficient for the subordinate permits requested and referenced above as well as any other special approvals required by the City which may be required to carry out the requested plans. The PROJECT shall be constructed substantially in accordance with the Phased Project Development Program's Conceptual Site Plan dated November 8, 2000, entitled "Park Place at Brickell - 2 Tower Scheme 1 - Site Plan - All Phases"; all modifications shall be subject to the review and approval of the Director of the Department of Planning and Zoning prior to the issuance of any building permits. Page 5 of 12 U. ILI — . • The PROJECT conforms to the requirements of the SD-5 Zoning District, as contained in Ordinance No. 11000, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended. The existing comprehensive plan future land use designation on the subject property allows the proposed mix of residential and commercial uses. CONDITIONS THE APPLICANT, ITS SUCCESSORS, AND/OR ASSIGNS, JOINTLY OR SEVERALLY, PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF ANY BUILDING PERMITS, SHALL COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING: 1. Meet all applicable building codes, land development regulations, ordinances and other laws. 2. Pay all applicable fees due prior to the issuance of a building permit; and pay DRI fees required to reserve development credits within 60 days of the effective date of this Resolution. 3. Allow the Miami Police Department to conduct a security survey, at the option of the Department, and to make recommendations concerning security measures and systems; further submit a report to the Department of Planning and Zoning, prior to commencement of construction, demonstrating how the Police Department recommendations, if any, have been incorporated into the PROJECT security and Page 6 of 12 A ��, construction plans, or demonstrate to the Planning Director why such recommendations are impractical. 4. Obtain approval from, or provide a letter from the Department of Fire -Rescue indicating APPLICANT'S coordination with members of the Fire Plan Review Section at the Department of Fire -Rescue in the review of the scope of the PROJECT, owner responsibility, building development process and review procedures, as well as specific requirements for fire protection and life safety systems, exiting, vehicular access and water supply. 5. Obtain approval from, or provide a letter of assurance from the Department of Solid Waste that the PROJECT has addressed all concerns of the said Department prior to the obtainment of a shell permit. 6. Prepare a Minority Participation and Employment Plan (including a Contractor/Subcontractor Participation Plan) to be submitted to the City's Director of Equal Employment Opportunity for review and comments, with the understanding that the APPLICANT must use its best efforts to follow the provisions of the City's Minority/Women Business Affairs and Procurement Program as a guide. 7. Record the following in the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida, prior to the issuance of a shell permit: (a) a Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions providing that the ownership, operation and maintenance of all common areas and facilities will be by the property owner or a mandatory property owner association in perpetuity; (b) a certified copy of the development order specifying that the 0 p� Page 7 of 12 c""R�, Development Order runs with the land and is binding on the APPLICANT, its successors, and assigns, jointly or severally. 8. Prior to the issuance of a shell permit, demonstrate to the City that the PROJECT has either: (a) completed its condominium requirements and has been approved for .such by the State of Florida; or (b) provide the City with an executed, recordable unity of title or covenant in -lieu of unity of title agreement for the subject property; said agreement shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Attorney's Office. 9. Provide the Department of Public Works with plans for proposed sidewalk and Swale area improvements for its review and approval prior to the issuance of a building permit. 10. Provide the Department of Planning and Zoning with a temporary parking plan, including an operational plan, which addresses construction employee parking during the construction period; said plan shall be subject to review and approval by the Department of Planning and Zoning prior to the issuance of any building permits and shall be enforced during construction activity. 11. Pursuant to the Departments of Fire -Rescue and General Services Administration, the roof area of the proposed structures shall be made available to the City of Miami for any necessary communications equipment at no charge to the City. Page 8 of 12 �� 1 0 0 12. The applicant shall retain the services of an archeological consultant who will be responsible for conducting archeological monitoring of all ground disturbing activity as well as the subsequent recovery of artifacts. Said consultant shall work at the direction of the Miami -Dade County Archeologist and shall provide reports to both that office and to the City. 13. Pursuant to the condition from the Urban Development Review Board, the APPLICANT shall submit final design details, including materials, a simplified color scheme, the projects solution for urban design from a pedestrian scale as well as from a distance, and final landscape and lighting plan, to the Director of the Planning and Zoning Department for review and approval, prior to the issuance .of a building permit. 14. Prior to the issuance of a shell permit, the APPLICANT shall submit an interim plan, including a landscape plan, which addresses design details for the land occupying Phases II and III of the PROJECT in the event that these future phases are not developed; said plan shall include a proposed timetable and shall be subject to review and approval by the Director of the Planning and Zoning Department. 15. Prior to the issuance of any building permits for each future phase of the PROJECT, the APPLICANT shall conduct updated traffic studies that shall include recommendations Page 9 of 12 ; �, ® 0 for mitigation, including signalization options for the area. 16. Apply for a substantial modification review and approval for each of the phases proposed within this Major Use Special Permit; each phase shall require approval of the design component including right-of-way improvements, fagade, treatment, signage, lighting, etc.; no phase of the project shall .be constructed until such time that said approvals are obtained; said approvals shall require all customary reviews required for a Major Use Special Permit, including the Planning Advisory Board, Large Scale Development Committee and the Urban Development Review Board. THE CITY SHALL: Establish the operative date of this Permit as being thirty (30) days from the date of its issuance; the issuance date shall constitute the commencement of the thirty (30) day period to appeal from the provisions of the Permit. 1 Page 10 of 12 �- ` • CONCLUSIONS OF LAW The Park Place at Brickell Project, proposed by the applicant, Park Place, LLC, complies with the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000, is consistent with the orderly development and goals of the City of Miami, and complies with local land development regulations and further, pursuant to Section 1703 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000: (1) the PROJECT will have a favorable impact on the economy of the City.; and (2) the PROJECT will efficiently use public transportation facilities; and (3) the PROJECT will favorably affect the need for people to find adequate housing reasonably accessible to their places of employment; and (4) the PROJECT will efficiently use necessary public facilities; and (5) the PROJECT will not negatively impact the environment and natural resources of the City; and (6) the PROJECT will not adversely affect public safety; and (7) the public welfare will be served by the PROJECT; and Page 11 of 12 (8) any potentially adverse effects of the PROJECT will be mitigated through conditions of this Major Use Special Permit. The proposed development does not unreasonably interfere with the achievement of the objectives of the adopted State Land Development Plan applicable to the City of Miami. Pursuant to Section 1305 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, the specific site plan aspects of the PROJECT, i.e., ingress and egress, offstreet parking and loading, refuse and service areas, signs and lighting, utilities, drainage and control of potentially adverse effects generally have been considered and will be further considered administratively during the process of issuing individual building permits and certificates of occupancy. Page 12 of 12 U, r� L_-A EXHIBIT " l" EXHIBIT "B": GEOAL DE,SC.eIPTior/.• TW SO!lT1l h Of L078; .41JO W S 9 INRIl1S, 80TArIlAAZWSA1e; .4AI0 = 179,Rv 2S, Q07R'/�cICC!/SIYE,BIG�'K99.SG�'17H, A44oi- 1.1E£0 MAAQOP BRICKFLL'$,dDD/T/OuTOTHE bfApOf M/.oti11;,4Li�AQDIAJG TO TAtEPG4TTy£AP£OF. � ' RECDRL�'D /,U�TQ00,� 'B'47 PAG£ 11S, OF Ty£A'/6UC R£CORDS OFD.406W11M,, fwww. AW L075 ICA A410 IC8,-W1aJUSOAv S $V80/Y/S/OW 44W OdvG 70 NF PLAT T,OR£OF, R£CORO£01,11, : WOAt'51 AT Mde 21, Of 1XE MaLlCRfCO.E'OS OF /71£ RIB410 RBCORMOf DAaDeCO!/A/TY, AWRiDA. S£CTIOA�l39,1t1WAc/SA�I/P 5a SOuTA�, AZ4/t/GSdI £.4ST GTY OF AIUMI, AWR/0A N+�} 1', '2/ 2Zr +Z3 - ,?Q�- ' 25 : 210_ 27 18 .r ,19. • �% � ` q'i��I; :.�•i rrb fib t��ir •!. q%'a; w� �°•`•''1eji � �, w ,r �. / �. •7V 3 4'Y*.•.; Ar•. • w . q.. .. ,�.� r r A 7 I•. 50' •: • _ �; � ;Sae .. �� �dA 'v 7 a 5 .a 3 2 / 2 Ae A4.0 LQCM Av P.B.' ift.y •, •ice' • L r�• r • sQ� 1� /1 l f� 1 i f Entry Driveway and Landscaped Plaza. Tower 2 BRICULL AVENUE SOUTH MiAMI AVENUE Phase 1 Tower 1 - 40 Stories, 420 units Residential Taww @ 30 floors 10 Smy Base vAh 8 Levek of Tower 1 Parking @ 630 apaass Ground Leral RsJml 0 Approx 7,000 sJ. Parking Garage; Phase 2 Tower 2. 40 Stories, 420 units Residenttal<Tower 19 30 floors I 10 Story Base with 8 Levels of Parldng @ 63D spaces IMiRIOJLYAFD Ground Lessl Retail 0 amrox, 13AM: BOONGALLEYMY o� r Parking Garage I Residential Tower i r ED Parking Garage - Total Units - 840 units Total Retail = opprna- 20,000 sA ' --------�- - Landscaped Plaza Total Parldn9 0 1,260 spaces PZ-14 APPLICANT HEARING DATE REQUESTILOCATION LEGAL DESCRIPTION PLANNING FACT SHEET Adrienne F. Pardo, Esq. for Park Place, L.L.C. September 20, 2000 Consideration of a Major Use Special Permit for the Park Place at Brickell Project located at 1450 Brickell Avenue. Complete legal description on file with the Hearing Boards Office. PETITION Consideration of approving a Major Use Special Permit for the Park Place at Brickell Project located at 1450 Brickell Avenue in order to allow development consisting of 918 residential units with 1,374 parking spaces and 22,823 square feet of retail. PLANNING Approval with conditions. RECOMMENDATION BACKGROUND AND Please see attached analysis. ANALYSIS PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD Approval VOTE: 5-1 CITY COMMISSION Continued from CC of October 26, 2000. APPLICATION NUMBER 2000-045 Item #3 CITY OF MIAMI • PLANNING DEPARTMENT 444 SW 21 AVENUE, 3R0 FLOOR • MIAMI, FLORIDA, 33130 PHONE (305) 416-1400 Date: 09/15/2000 Page 1 0-10'36 • • Analysis for major Use Special Permit for the PARK PLACE AT BRICKELL PROJECT located at approximately the northwest corner of Brickell Avenue and SE 15' Road CASE NO. 2000-045 Pursuant to Ordinance 11000, as amended, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, the subject proposal for the Park Place at Brickell Project has been reviewed to allow a Major Use Special Permit. This Permit also includes the following requests: CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 906.6 for active recreational facilities (including a swimming pool); CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT to permit staging and parking during construction (to be approved prior to obtaining a building permit from Planning); CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT for Development Signs when combined with construction signs; CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 917.2.1 to allow valet parking for residential use; CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Section 915.2 for FAA clearance letter; CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 6, Section 605.3.1 for development of new construction within the Special District; CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 6, Section 605.3.1 for a temporary construction fence and covered walkway; CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 6, Section 605.3.1 for a temporary construction trailer; CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 15 for uniform signage guides and standards; CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 15 for waiver of certain pedestrian pathway requirements; CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Section 908.2 for access from a public street or roadway width greater than 25 feet; 00-1036 CLASS H SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 923 for reduction in loading berth dimensions (as specified in the application); Special Exception_ as per Article 6, Sec. 605 .to allow bar/lounge open to the public within the SD-5 District; Special Exception, as per Article 9, Sec. 917.1.2 to allow valet parking for restaurant up to 50% of existing off-street parking spaces; Variance pursuant to Zoning Ordinance °11000, as amended, Article 6, Section 605, for one ground level., setback requested along the interior yard (adjacent to the existing alleyway) from the required.15'-0" down to 6'-6". Variance pursuant to Zoning Ordinance 11000, as amended, Article 6, Section 605, for one ground level setback requested along the north interior yard from the required 15'-0" down to 3". Certificate of Appropriateness for ground disturbing activity. in an archeological conservation area (city Code Section 23-5a); Reservation of Downtown Development of Regional Impact (DRI) credits (City Code Chapter 13); Designation as a phased project, pursuant to Section 2502 of Zoning Ordinance 11000; as amended. Waiver from the City Commission for the following: 1. Noise Ordinance during the required concrete pours for construction of the building. Pursuant to Articles 13 and 17 of Zoning Ordinance .11000, approval of the requested Major Use Special Permit shall. be considered sufficient for the subordinate permits requested and referenced above as well as any, other special approvals required by the City which may be required to carry out the requested plans. The requested Special Permit is for th*e purpose of allowing a mixed -use development project with consisting of 22,823 sq. ft. of retail use, and a total of 918 residential units, with 1,374 parking spaces, for the property located at approximately the northwest corner of Brickell Avenue and SE 15`' Road within the Brickell area (see attached legal description, location maps and aerial photographs for exact property boundaries). no- In determining the appropriateness of the proposed residential project, the Planning and Zoning Department has referred this project to the Large Scale Development Committee (LSDC), the City of Miami Preservation Officer, and the Urban Development Review Board (UDRB) for additional input and recommendations; the following findings have been made: • It is found that the proposed retail and residential development project will benefit the Downtown District by creating new housing opportunities in the Central Brickell area to serve Downtown. • It is found that the subject property has convenient access to public transit that makes it ideally suited for residential and retail as a mixed use to serve the downtown area. • It is found that per the Fire and GSA Departments of the City, the roof of the proposed structure may be required for communications equipment to serve the City; this are should be made available for said use at no charge to the City. • It is found that the City of Miami Preservation Officer reviewed the project and that a recommendation was made that archeological monitoring be conducted in the manner set forth in the condition described below. • It is found that the project was reviewed by the Large Scale Development Committee on May 24, 2000 and has been modified to address the expressed technical concerns raised at said Large Scale Development Committee meeting; however, additional design details related to sidewalk and swale area improvements will have to be submitted at the time of permitting. • It is found that the UDRB has recommended approval of the proposed project, with conditions as specified below, pursuant to a public meeting held on July 12, 2000. • It is found that the narrow width and irregular shape of a portion of the subject property is a substantial hardship that limits reasonable use of the property and therefore justifies the requested setback variance. The special conditions attached to the subject property that justify the requested variances are the property's narrow width in conjunction with its irregular shape and its Special SD-5 Zoning classification. If the setbacks were to be provided, Phase I of the project would lose the necessary efficiency in its parking areas due to insufficient space for an efficient layout. If the setbacks were to be provided, the size of the property would cause a final design solution which would put a hardship on reasonable use of portions of the property and therefore not comply with the intent of the SD-5 District. • It is found that the setback variance is being requested in order to develop a project that can provide an effective parking garage, along with ground level pedestrian activities, and a residential tower above. 0U-.U36 • It is found that the proposed project offers the most reasonable solution to the design problem facing this particular site., • It is found that upon referral of the proposed project to Public Works and the Downtown NET Office, the following comments were received: 1,. Pursuant to the' Department of Public Works, the property must be replatted and the project requires plans for proposed sidewalk and swale area improvements prior to -the issuance of a building permit; and 2. Pursuant to the Downtown NET Office, the applicant shall submit a parking plan for construction employees; including an operational plan for construction activity and enforcement;- said parking plan shall be subject to the review and approval by the Department of Planning and,Zoning prior to the issuance of any building permits. • It is found that, as a phased development project it is difficult, if not impossible, for the developer to anticipater levels of actual future development and associated traffic impacts associated with such development. In order to adequately ensure that. adverse impacts to the Brickell area will not occur, the Planning and Zoning Department would recommend that a condition be added to this development order which requires the applicant to conduct updated traffic studies prior to obtaining building permits for each subsequent phase of this project. The subject traffic studies should include recommendations•for mitigation, including signalization options for the area. • It is found that the Department of Planning and Zoning is in concurrence with these comments and will require compliance with the above referenced conditions prior to the issuance of any building permits for the proposed project. • It is found that with, respect to all additional criteria as specified in Section 1305. of Zoning Ordinance 11000, the proposal has been reviewed and found. to be adequate. Based on these findings, the Department of Planning and Zoning is- recommending approval of the requested Development Project'with the following conditions: 1. The approval of this Major Use Special Permit shall be subject to the recordation of the following documents prior to the issuance of shell permits for the proposed project: a. Unity of Title or covenant in lieu thereof providing that the ownership, operation and maintenance of all common areas and facilities will be by the property owner or a mandatory property. owner association. in U perpetuity or completion of the State of Florida condominium process which assures the same compliance. b. Development Order specifying that the Development Order runs with the land and is binding on the Applicant, it successors and assigns, jointly or severally. 2. Pursuant to the Department of Public Works, the property requires re -platting and plans for proposed sidewalk and swale area improvements prior to the issuance of a building permit. 3. Pursuant to the Fire and GSA Departments, the roof area of the proposed structure shall be made available to the City of Miami for any necessary communications equipment at no charge to the City. 4. The applicant shall submit a parking plan for construction employees, including an operational plan for construction activity and enforcement; said parking plan shall be subject to the review and approval by the Department of Planning and Zoning prior to the issuance of any building permits. 5. - The applicant shall retain the services of an archeological consultant who will be responsible for conducting archeological monitoring of all ground disturbing activity as well as the subsequent recovery of artifacts. Said consultant shall work at the direction of the Dade County Archeologist and shall provide reports to both that office and to the City. 6. Pursuant to the condition from the UDRB, the APPLICANT shall submit final design details, including materials, a simplified color scheme, the projects solution for urban design from a pedestrian scale as well as from a distance, and final landscape and lighting plan, to the Director of the Panning and Zoning Department for review and approval, prior to the issuance of a building permit. 7. Prior to the issuance of a shell permit, the APPLICANT shall submit an interim plan, including a landscape plan, which addresses design details for the land occupying Phases II and III of this project in the event that these future phases are not developed; said plan shall include a proposed timetable and shall be subject to review and approval by the Director of the Planning and Zoning Department. 8. The applicant shall conduct updated traffic studies prior to obtaining building permits for each future phase of this project. The subject traffic studies should include recommendations for mitigation, including signalization options for the area. 00 1006 9. This approval shall also be subject to all additional conditions as specified in the attached Development Order. 0 .0 RESOLUTION PA.B -45-00 A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT, WITH CONDITIONS AS SPECIFIED BY STAFF, FOR THE PARK PLACE AT BRICKELL PROJECT LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY 1450 BRICKELL AVENUE, IN ORDER TO ALLOW DEVELOPMENT CONSISTING OF 918 RESIDENTIAL UNITS WITH 1,374 PARKING SPACES AND 22,823 SQUARE FEET OF RETAIL. HEARING DATE: September 20, 2000 ITEM NO. 3 VOTE: 5-1 ATTEST: --Ana Gelabert-Sanchez; ' ector Planning and Zoning Department Q0-1036 �' r 1 i! ' r' � � • • V S r Q ST r•s S.W. II SL • • � _ + C I T T • e a . t e i s� � • e i w •,.� b 8 o w s N ' tt f• 12 •• •. . 7 I �Cia S T.3i It a Y 100 0° 4 T :e 2 to i...•i. S! » ,• .o „ SCUTt!SIOE ELc.M - oe S•E 'd�iw r "CT e ""•' SCHOOL it:rtr o° yvTO ,Z '•�' Q N �3 ', i• .. � N f,AL 7F • •• N �� i. SE. 13 Sr r�sCr�t!A a4 i uTq, s ON f BI w.. u ro 1° • fe • , Y . S. W. s ~ M• •I NMI • ST •. ,O ti r �� N s Q h• � w r $. 14 FOR • • aC46 ` •• cd SIP t* �'� s ii Y a f l• ,•. p r I E. to ''• ••t ' � ,� N 2 j IL . 9a ' a P o • ' �. Ve COSTA BELLA + ! o , 4Cr SUB. �. Tr •A ,. CI r Y LIMI r$ -?AILR O10j . :PECIAL P+JeUC INTEREST `a rr15rORIC PRESERvar1ON �• �1-6 PEOFirR,AN IArNwar; •eem•m. 00-1036 ... ... W, WU/ .. .. ...... . .. .... .... . .. ........ .. .......... �M/O . ....... . .. .......... OF ........... ... . .... .... - . . . ........ . . . ........... ......... . . .... VW:. A.2 .. ... .... .. ... . ....... ... ........ ... . ... ..... ..... . . . .. ....... ­� .. .. ...... 1/0 .. .... ..... ....... Me .......... ... .. .... DE, r "NZ ---- I PM'M/R� .... . ... . ...... .. ... . ........ ...... . ........... ..... . ..... . A., i i M. .. .. ....... . . ........ ..... To lop, .............. .......... M. ....... .. ... .'�x ....... ... ............ .. ... . . ........ 4. WE/ ... ................ ............... ... ..fiw ..... ....... ........ 'OR AN ... ....... f-ITY OF NII?.MI 0 DEPART OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT IT IS INTENDED THAT MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMITS BE REQUIRED WHERE SPECIFIED USES AND/OR OCCUPANCIES INVOLVE MATTERS DEEMED TO BE OF CITYWIDE OR AREA -WIDE IMPORTANCE. THE CITY COMMISSION SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR DETERMINATIONS ON APPLICATIONS FOR MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMITS. (SEE ARTICLE 11 OF ORDINANCE 11000. AS4AMVDSD, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF TSB C17T OF MIAMI. FLOBIDA.) THE CITY COMMISSION SHALL REFER ALL APPLICATIONS FOR MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMITS TO THE PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD AND TO THE DIRECTOR OF THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT FOR RECOMMENDATIONS, AND MAY MAKE REFERRALS TO AGENCIES, BODIES, OR OFFICERS, EITHER THROUGH THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT OR DIRECTLY, FOR REVIEW, ANALYSIS AND/OR TECHNICAL FINDINGS AND DETERMINATIONS AND REPORTS THEREON. (SEE SECTION 1301.5 OF ORDINANCE 11000, AS AMENDED, n E ZOY NG ORDINANCE OF THE CDYOFAff"a FLORIDA.) SECTION 2453 OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF MLAMI. FLORIDA, AS AMENDED, GENERALLY REQUIRES ANY PERSON WHO RECEIVES COMPENSATION, REMUNERATION OR EXPENSES FOR CONDUCTING LOBBYING ACTIVITIES TO REGISTER AS A LOBBYIST wrm THE CITY CLERIC, PRIOR TO ENGAGING IN LOBBYING ACIM17ES BEFORE CITY STAFF, BOARDS, COMMITTEES AND THE CITY COMMISSION. A COPY OF SAID ORDINANCE IS AVAILABLE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERIC (IvIIABC CITY HALL), LOCATED AT 3500 PAN AMERICAN DRIVE, MIA 11, FLORIDA, 33133. NOTE: THMAPAUCATIONMUSTBETYPEWRITTEIVA"SIGNED INBL4CS1NX Adrienne F. Pardo on behalf of Park Place, L.L.C., the Contract Purchaser and I, Brickell Investment Realty Corp Owner , hereby apply to the Director of the Department of Planning and Development of the City of Miami for approval of a Major Use Special Permit under the provisions of Article 17 of the City of Miami Zoning Ordinance. Property Address:- See Exhibit "3" Nature of proposed use (be specific): A MUSP, for 418 residential units See Zoning Write Up attached as Exhibit "2" APPLICATION MATERIALS 1 attach the following in support an$ explanation of the application: l3 1. Two original surveys, prepared by a State of Florida Registered Land Surveyor within one year from the date of application. Cq 2. Affidavit disclosing ownership of property covered by application and disclosure of interest form (attach forms 4-83 and 4a-83 to application). Page lof2� v APPLICATION MATERIAI Rcontinued) I attach the following in support and explanation of the application: 91 3. Certified list of owners of real estate within a 375-foot radius from the outside boundaries of property (attach form 6-83 to application). l 4. Maps of the: a) Existing zoning designation. b) Adopted comprehensive plan designation for areas on. and around the property. ® 5. General location map showing relation to the site or activity to major streets, schools, existing utilities, shopping areas, important physical features. in and adjoining the project, and the like. ® 6. Concept Plan a) Site plan and relevant information per Section 1304.2.ld-h. b) Relationships to surrounding existing and proposed futures uses and activities, systems and facilities, per Section 17023.2a. c) How concept affects existing zoning and adopted comprehensive' plan principles and designations; tabulation. of any required variances, special permits,. changes of zoning or exemptions, per Section 1702.3.2b. ® 7. Developmental Impact Study (an application for development approval for a Development of Regional Impact may substitute). ❑ 8. Other (be specific): 13 9. Fee of S 45 , 000 , for the Major Use Special Permit, based on current fee schedule as set forth .in Chapter 62 of the Code of the City of Miami, as amended , 13 10. Additional fee of $ 5 8 , 9 4 5 . 3 0 for any required special permits, changes of zoning or variances set forth in chapter 62 of the Code of the City of Miami, as ameaded. Total Fee: S 103,945.30 1 Signature LA Name Ar1.r1ennP F. Pard.o Address 1221 Rrirka11, A»en'-.2 Miami Fl 33131 PhonelFa OS 579-0,83 305)9A1-5683 Date FINAL APPROVAL OF THIS APPLICATION FOR MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT SHALL CONSIST OF AN EXECUTED RESOLUTION BY THE MIAMI CITY COMMISSION AND A DEVELOPMENT ORDER ATTACHED THERETO WHICH SPECIFIES TPiE'CONbmoNS UNDER WHICH THIS MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT .APPLICATION IS APPROVED; IF APPROVED BY THE = .COMMISSION, SAID RESOLUTION AND DEVELOPMENT ORDER SHALL, UPON E70r=ON THEREOF, BE TRANSMITTED TO THE, OWNER OR AUTHORIZED AGENT AT TPE ADDRESS SPECIFIED ABOVE. Page 2 of 2 ZONING FACT SHEET Case Number: 2000-0361 11-Sep-00 Item No: 6 Location: Approx. 1432-1460 Brickell Ave, 1435-1485 S.Miami Ave. 8, 1 SE 15 Rd. Legal: (Complete legal description on file with the Office of Hearing Boards) Applicant: Brickell Investment Realty Corp. Adrienne Pardo, Esq. Beatriz Azcui-Diaz, Esq. 1221 Brickell Avenue 701 Brickell Ave. #2100 Miami, FL 33131 Miami, FL 33131 App. Ph: (305) 577-3257 Rep. Ph: (305) 579-0683 ext Rep. Fa (___) = ext Zoning: SD-5 Brickell Avenue Area Residential -Office District Request: Special Exceptions as part of a Major Use Special Permit for Park Place at Brickell, as listed in Ordinance No. 11000, as amended, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Article 9, Section 917.1.2, Valet Parking, generally, to allow valet parking for restaurant up to 50% of existing off-street parking spaces, and per Article 6, Section 607, SD-7 Central Brickell Rapid Transit Commercial -Residential District, to allow a bar/lounge open to the public within the SD-5 District. Purpose: This will allow a mixed use multistory structure on this site. Recommendations: Planning Department: Approval with conditions Public Works: Replatting is required Plat and Street Committee: Replatting is required Dade County Transportation: No comments Enforcement History, If any C.E.B. Case No: N/A Last Hearing Date: Found: N/A Violation(s) Cited: N/A Ticketing Action: N/A Daily Fine: $0.00 Affidavit Non -Compliance Issued on: Warning Letter sent on: Total Fines to Date: $0.00 Lien Recorded on: Comply Order by: CEB Action: Zoning Board Resolution No.: ZB 2000-0353 Zoning Board: Approval with conditions Vote: 9-0 City Commission: N/A Analysis for Special Exceptions for the PARK PLACE AT BRICKELL Located at approx. 1432-1460 Brickell Avenue & 1 SE 15' Road CASE NO. 2000-0361 Pursuant to Ordinance 11000, as amended, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, the subject proposal for Park Place at Brickell Project has been reviewed to allow the following Special Exceptions: • Special Exception per Article 6, Section 607 to allow a Bar/lounge open to the public within the SD-5 district; • Special Exception per Article 9, Section 917.2.1 to allow valet parking for restaurant up to 50% of the existing off-street parking spaces. The requested Special Exceptions are for the purpose of allowing the Park Place at Brickell Project, a mixed use phased development project consisting of a total of 918 units, 22,823 square feet of ground floor retail and 1,374 parking spaces for the property located at approximately 1432-1460 Brickell Ave., 1435-1485 S. Miami Ave. within the Brickell area (see attached legal description, location maps and aerial photographs for exact property boundaries). Note: These Special Exceptions also encompasses the following subordinate permits: 1. Class I Special Permit for aviation hazard, FAA clearance approval required (Article 9, Section 915.2). 2. Class I for pool/outdoor recreational area (Article 9, Section 906.6). 3. Class I for Special Permit as per Article 9, Section 917.2.1 to allow valet parking for residential uses. 4. Class I Special Permit as per Article 9, Section 925.3.8 to allow development/construction/rental signage. 5. Class 11 Special Permit for development within a Special District (Article 6, Section 607.3.1). 6. Class II Special Permit for temporary construction fence and covered walkway (Article 6, Section 607.3.1) 7. Class II Special Permit for temporary construction trailer (Article 6, Section 607.3.1). 8. Class II Special Permit to waive certain requirements of Brickell Promenade Design Development Plan and Urban Design Guidelines. 9. Class II Special Permit per Article 9, Section 923.4 providing a total of 12 berths, six (6) berths at 12 feet x 35 feet and six (6) berths reduced to 10 feet x 20 feet where twelve 12 feet x 35 feet are required (four per phase). 10. Class II Special Permit as per Article 9, Section 908.2 for access from public street roadway width greater than 25 feet. 6�� U36 The following findings have been made: • It is found that the proposed mixed -use phased development project will benefit the Downtown District by creating new residential and retail uses along Brickell Avenue to serve Downtown. • It is found that the subject of these Special Exceptions, specifically a Bar/Lounge and Valet Service for restaurant up to 50% of existing off-street parking spaces, for the proposed project, are completely within the scope and character of the project given . that it is a high density mixed -use residential project to be located along a significant parcel along the Brickell Avenue and S. Miami Ave. corridor of Downtown Miami. • It is found that with respect to all additional criteria as specified in Section 1305 of Zoning Ordinance 11000, the proposal has been reviewed and found to be adequate. Based on these findings, the Planning and Zoning Department is ' recommending approval of the requested Mixed -Use Residential Development Project with the following conditions: 1- The applicant shall present all final design details, including color, material and ' final landscape plan for review and approval by the Planning Director prior to he issuance of a building permit. 2- This approval shall be subject to all additional conditions specified in the final development order of Major Use Special Permit for the project. j"` U3,� 0 0 Miami Zoning Board Resolution: ZB 2000-0353 Monday, September 11, 2000 Mr. George Barket offered the following Resolution and moved its adoption Resolution: AFTER CONSIDERING THE FACTORS SET FORTH IN SECTION 1305 OF ORDINANCE 11000, THE ZONING BOARD GRANTED THE SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS AS PART OF A MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT FOR PARK PLACE AT BRICKELL, AS LISTED IN ORDINANCE 11000, AS AMENDED, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, ARTICLE 9, SECTION 917.1.2, VALET PARKING, GENERALLY, TO ALLOW VALET PARKING FOR RESTAURANT UP TO 50% OF EXISTING OFFSTREET PARKING SPACES, AND PER ARTICLE 6, SECTION 607, SD-7 CENTRAL BRICKELL RAPID TRANSIT COMMERCIAL -RESIDENTIAL DISRICT, TO ALLOW A BAR/LOUNGE OPEN TO THE PUBLIC WITHIN THE SD-5 DISTRICT FOR THE PROPERTIES LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY 1432-1460 BRICKELL AVENUE, 1435-1485 SOUTH MIAMI AVENUE AND 1 SOUTHEAST 15TH ROAD, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS THE SOUTH 1/2 OF LOT 8, LOTS 9 THROUGH 15, BOTH INCLUSIVE, AND LOTS 17 THROUGH 25, BOTH INCLUSIVE, BLOCK 99, SOUTH AMENDED MAP OF BRICKELL'S ADDITION TO THE MAP OF MIAMI (B-113), AND LOTS 16A AND 16B, WILKINSON'S SUBDIVISION (51-21), PUBLIC RECORDS OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA; ZONED SD-5 BRICKELL AVENUE AREA RESIDENTIAL -OFFICE DISTRICT. THESE SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS WERE GRANTED PER PLANS ON FILE WITH A TIME LIMITATION OF TWENTY FOUR MONTHS IN WHICH A BUILDING PERMIT MUST BE OBTAINED, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT: 1) THE APPLICANT SHALL PRESENT ALL FINAL DESIGN DETAILS, INCLUDING COLOR, MATERIAL AND FINAL LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE PLANNING DIRECTOR PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT, AND 2) THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE SUBJECT TO ALL ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS SPECIFIED IN THE FINAL DEVELOPMENT ORDER OF MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT FOR THE PROJECT. Upon being seconded by Mr. Humberto J. Pellon, the motion was passed and adopted by the following vote: Mr. George Barket Ms. Gloria M. Basila Mr. Rodolfo De La Guardia Mr. Charles J. Flowers Ms. Ileana Hemandez-Acosta Mr. Humberto J. Pellon Mr. Juvenal Pina Mr. Ricardo D. Ruiz Mr. Angel Urquiola Mr. Georges Williams Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Away Yes Yes AYE: 9 NAY: 0 ABSTENTIONS: 0 NO VOTES: 0 Case No.: 2000-0361 Item Nbr: Case No.: 2000-0361 Item Nbr: 6 CITY OF MANE OFFICE OF HEARING BOARDS APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTION SECTION 2-653 OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, AS AMENDED, GENERALLY REQUIRES ANY PERSON WHO RECEIVES COMPENSATION, REMUNERATION OR EXPENSES FOR CONDUCTING LOBBYING ACTIVITIES TO REGISTER AS A LOBBYIST WITH THE CITY CLERK; PRIOR TO ENGAGING IN LOBBYING ACTIVITIES BEFORE CITY STAFF, BOARDS, COMMITTEES AND TBE CITY COMMISSION. A COPY OF SAID ORDINANCE IS AVAILABLE IN THE OFFICE OF TBE CITY CLERK GA AMI CITY HALL), LOCATED AT 3500 PAN AMERICAN DRIVE, MIAMI, FLORIDA, 33133. NOTE: THIS APPLICATION MUST BE TYPEWRTITEN AND SIGNED IN BLACK INK Within the City generally, or within certain zoning districts, certain structures, uses, and/or occupancies specified in this ordinance are of a nature requiring special and intensive review to determine whether or not they should be permitted in specific locations, and if so, the special limitations, conditions, and safeguards which should be applied as reasonably necessary promote the general purposes of this Zoning Ordinance and, in particular, to protect adjoining properties and the neighborhood from avoidable potentially adverse effects. It is further intended that the expertise and judgment of the Zoning Board be exercised in making such determinations, in accordance with the rules, considerations and limitations relating to Special Exceptions (see Article 16 of the Zoning Ordinance). Formal public notice and hearing is mandatory for Special Exceptions. The Zoning Board shall be solely responsible for determinations on applications for Special Exceptions except when otherwise provided for in the City Code. All applications shall be referred to the Director of the Department Planning and Development for his recommendations and the Director shall make any further referrals required by these regulations. Adrienne F. Pardo on behalf of Park Place, L.L.C., the Contract Purchaser and I, Brickell Inv. Realty Corp.. Qwner , hereby apply to the City of Miami Zoning Board for approval of a Special Exception for the property located at Brickell Avenue & SE 15th Road S e e attached folio number see attached E5diibit 3 . Nature of Proposed Use (please be specific): 1) for valet parking for a restaurant. and--2) for a bar/lounge open to the public. In support of this application, the following material is submitted. X 1. Two original surveys of the property prepared by a State of Florida Registered Land Surveyor within one year from the date of application. x_ 2. Four copies -signed and sealed by a State of Florida Registered Architect or Engineer -of site plans showing (as required) property boundaries, existing (if any) and proposed structure(s),' parking, landscaping, etc.; building elevations and dimensions and computations of lot area and building spacing. 00-1036. X 3. Affidavits disclosing ownership of property covered by applications and disclosure of interest from (attached to application): X 4. Certified list of owners of real estate within a 375-foot radius of the outside boundaries of property covered by the application. X 5. At least two photographs that show the entire property (land and improvements). X 6. Recorded wan* arty deed and tax forms for the most current year available that show the present owner(s) of the property. X 7. Other (Specify and attach cover letters explaining why an document ou.are attaching is pertinent to this {,P fY P 8 Y Y Y g� application). Submittal of MUSP application. x 8. Fee of $ -0 to apply toward the cost of processing according to Section 62-156 of the Zoning Ordinance: Special Exception .... ................. ........... ... ....... ...... ................$ .800.00 Special Exception requiring automatic city commission review.......................$2,000.00 Extension of time for special exception ............................ ..... $ 500.00 Public hearing mail notice fees, including cost of handling and mailing per notice .......... ............... ................................................ $ 3.50 Surcharge equal to applicable fee from, item above, not to exceed eight hundred dollars ($800.00) except from agencies of the city; such surcharge to be refunded. to the applicant if there is no appeal from a property.owner within three hundred and seventy-five (375) feet of the, subject property. Signature 'Name Adrienne F. Pardo Address 1221 Brickell Avenue Miami, FL 33131 (305) 579-0500 Telephone Date --10 b • Case Number: 2000-0362 • ZONING FACT SHEET 11-Sep-00 Item No: 7 Location: Approx.1432-1460 Brickell Ave,1435-1485 S.Miami Ave & 1 SE 15 Rd. Legal: (Complete legal description on file with the Office of Hearing Boards) Applicant: Brickell Investment Realty Corp. Adrienne Pardo, Esq. Beatriz Azcui-Diaz, Esq. 1221 Brickell Avenue 701 Brickell Ave.#2100 Miami; FL 33131 Miami, FL 33131 App. Ph: (305) 577-3257 Rep. Ph: (305) 579-0683 ext Rep. Fa (_J = ext Zoning: SD-5 Brickell Avenue Area Residential -Office District Request: Variances as part of a Major Use Special Permit for Park Place at Brickell, from Ordinance No. 11000, as amended, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Article 6, Section 607, SD-7.Central Brickell Rapid Transit Commercial -Residential District, to allow one ground level setback along the interior yard (adjacent to the existing alleyway) of 6'-6" (16-0" required), and one ground level setback along the north interior yard of 0'-3" (16-0" required). Purpose: This will allow a mixed use multistory structure on this site. Recommendations: Planning Department:. Approval with conditions Public Works: Replatting is required Plat and Street Committee: Replatting is required Dade County Transportation: No comments Enforcement History, If any C.E.B. Case No: N/A Last Hearing Date: Found: N/A Violation(s) Cited: N/A Ticketing Action: N/A Daily Fine: $0.00 Affidavit Non -Compliance Issued on: Warning Letter sent on: Total Fines to Date: $0.00 Lien Recorded on: Comply Order by: CEB Action: Zoning Board Resolution No.: ZB 2000-0354 Zoning Board: Approval with conditions Vote: 9-0 City_Commission: N/A ANALYSIS FOR VARIANCES AS A COMPONENT OF A MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT PARK PLACE AT BRICKELL CASE NO: 2000-0362 The requested Variances are a component of a Major Use Special Permit application for the purpose of allowing a Residential Planned Unit Development in excess of 200 units (918 units proposed); and for allowing a development with an excess of 500 parking spaces (1,374 spaces proposed). The Park Place at Brickell project shall be located at approximately 1432-1460 Brickell Avenue & V SE 15`h Road (see attached legal description, location maps and aerial photographs for exact property boundaries). Pursuant to Section 401 of Ordinance 11000, as amended, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, the subject proposal has been reviewed to permit a structure with the following setbacks and loading berths: Ground level along the interior yard required: 15'-0" feet (Adjacent to the existing alleyway) proposed: 6'-6" feet Ground level setback along the north required: 15'-0" Interior yard proposed: 0'-3" In determining the appropriateness of the Variances for the proposed residential project the following findings have been made: • It is found that the proposed residential planned unit development project will benefit the Downtown District by creating new housing opportunities for residents and employees of the area. • It is found that the narrow width of subject property along the northern portion of the property is a substantial hardship which limits reasonable use of that section of property and therefore justifies the requested setback variances. The special conditions attached to the subject property which justify the requested variances are the property's narrow width along the northern section of the property in conjunction with its Special SD-5 Zoning classification. 00#-1036 • It is found that the setback variance is being requested in order to develop a project, which can provide an effective parking garage, along with ground level pedestrian activities, and a residential tower above. • It is found that the proposed project offers the most reasonable solution to the design problem facing this particular site. Based on these findings, the Department of Planning and Zoning is recommending approval of the requested variances and approval of the requested Residential Planned Unit Development Project with the following conditions: 1- The applicant shall present all final design details, including color, material 'and final landscape plan for review and approval by the Planning Director prior to he issuance of a building permit. 2- This approval shall be subject to all additional conditions specified in the final development order of Major Use Special Permit for the project. zCu Yes No N/A W 0 ANALYSIS FOR VARIANCE CASE NO. 2000-0362 Special conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the property. Special conditions are result of petitioner's actions. Literal interpretation of ordinance causes undue hardship on petitioner. Granting variance conveys same treatment to owner. Variance, if granted, is the minimum variance for reasonable use of property. Is in harmony with genera) intent and purpose of ordinance. Miami Zoning .Board Resolution: ZB 2000-0354 Monday, September 11, 2000 ABSENTS: Ms: Fernandez: Motion carries 9-0 1 � Teresita L. Fer andez, C*f"' Office of. Hearing Boards Case No.: 2000-0362 Item Nbr. 7 • • 1903.2. Written petition. A written petition for a variance is submitted to the officer or agent of the city specified by the city manager demonstrating all of the following: (a) Special conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the land, structure, or building involved and which are not applicable to other lands, structures, or build- ings in the same zoning district; (b) The special conditions and circumstances do not result from the actions of the peti- tioner; (c) Literal interpretation of the provisions of this zoning ordinance deprives the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same zoning district under the terms of this zoning ordinance and works unnecessary and undue hardship on the petitioner; (d) Granting the variance requested conveys the same treatment to the individual owner as to the owner of other lands, buildings, or structures in the same zoning district; (e) The variance, if granted, is the minimum variance that makes possible the reasonable use of the land, building, or structure; and (f) The grant of the variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of this zoning ordinance, and is not injurious to the neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare. CITY OF MIAMI OFFICE OF HEARING BOARDS APPLICATION FOR VARL4,NCE SECTION 2-653 OF THE CODE OF TBE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, AS AMENDED, GENERALLY REQUIRES ANY PERSON WHO RECEIVES COMPENSATION, REMUNERATION OR EXPENSES FOR CONDUCTING LOBBYING ACTIVITIES TO REGISTER AS A LOBBYIST WITH THE CITY CLERK, PRIOR TO ENGAGING IN LOBBYING ACTIVITIES BEFORE CITY STAFF, BOARDS, COMMITTEES AND THE CITY COMMISSION. A COPY . OF SAID ORDINANCE IS AVAILABLE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK (MIAMI CITY HALL), LOCATED AT 3500 PAN AMERICAN DRIVE, MIAMI, FLORIDA, 33133. NOTE: THIS APPLICATION MUST BE TYPEWRITTEN AND SIGNED IN BLACK INK. A Variance is a relaxation of the terms of the Zoning Ordinance where such action will not be contrary to the public interest and where owing to conditions peculiar to the property and not the result of actions of the applicant, a literal enforcement of this Ordinance would result in unnecessary and undue hardship on the properly As used in the Zoning Ordinance, a Variance is authorized only for height, area, size of structure, dimensions of yards, other open spaces, off-street parking and/or loading requirements (see Article 19 of the Zoning Ordinance). and Br'ckell Inv. Realty Corp., Owner I, Adrienne F. Pardo, on behalf of Park Place LM contract purchaser , hereby petition the City of Miami Zoning Board for a Variance from the terms of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, affecting property located at See attached Exhibit T' , folio number See attached Exhibit "3" as specified below. In support of this application, the following material is submitted. X 1. Two original surveys of the property prepared by a State of Florida Registered Land Surveyor within one year from the date of application. X 2. Four copies -signed and sealed by a State of Florida Registered Architect or Engineer -of site plans showing (as required) property boundaries, existing (if any) and proposed stmcture(s), parking, landscaping, etc.; building elevations and dimensions and computations of lot area and building spacing. _X 3. Affidavits disclosing ownership of property covered by applications and disclosure of interest form (attached to application). X 4. Certified list of owners of real estate within a 375-foot radius of the outside boundaries of property covered by the application. _X 5. At least two photographs that show the entire property (land and improvements). 00-1036 X 6. Recorded warranty deed and tax foams for the most current year available that show the present owner(s) of the property. X 7. Other (Specify and attach cover letters explaining why- any document you are attaching is pertinent to this application). A Maior Use Special Permit =lication X 8.. Fee of $5 8 , 9 4 5 . 3 apply toward the cost of processing. according to Section 42-.156 of the Zoning Ordinance: CS, PR, R-1, R-2, (single-family and duplex residential uses) ................... $ 250.00 Piers, docks, wharves and the like, for each Variance from the ordinance, per lineal foot........................................................................... $ 45.00 Minimum......................................................................I............................. $ 700.00 All applications for Variances relating to the same structure shall be assessed a single fee to be calculated per square foot of gross floor area of the proposed structure or addition,based upon the definition of gross floor area found in Section.2502 of Zoning Ordinance, as amended.............................................................................. $ .10 Minimum.....................:.............................................................................. $ 650.00 Application for Variance as a result of a change in approved plans or as a result of a violation notice shall be charged an additional fee, per Variance: CS, PR, R- 1, R-2.................. :.................................... :............................. $ 250.00 All other residential districts...................................................................... $ 450.00 All nonresidential districts......................................................................... $ 550.00 Extension of time for Variance.................................................................. $ 500.00 Public hearing mail notice fees, including cost of handling and mailingper notice ............................................................ ................ $ 3.50 Surcharge equal to. applicable fee from items above, not to exceed eight hundred dollars (800.00), except from agencies of the City; such surcharge to be refunded to the applicant if there is no appeal'from a property owner within three hundred and seventy-five (375) .feet of the subject property X 9. The Variance request is for relief from the provisions of .Section 6 0 7 of the City of Miami Zoning Ordinance as follows: See attached Exhibit "A". X 10. In support of the application, the applicant is prepared to offer the following evidence, on the point enumerated at Section 1903 of the City of Miami Zoning Ordinance. Note: This application cannot be accepted for Zoning Board action unless all of the following six items are completed. __ (a) Special conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the land, structure, or building involved and which are not applicable to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same zoning district in that: (list evidence to be produced and use additional sheets, if necessary.) The property is narrow at the north end. Thus, it is impossible to provide an efficient and useable parking garage without obtaining the requested variances. X . (b) The special conditions and circumstances do not result from the actions of the petitioner in that: the developer has no control -over the width of the property. _X (c) Literal .interpretation of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same zoning district under the terms of the Zoning Ordinance and would work unnecessary and undue hardships on the petitioner in that: Denial of the variance would prohibit the developer from providing necessary parking for the project. In addition, the City is in the process of amending the requirement for upper level setbacks and the Planning Advisory Board at its May 31, 2000 meeting recommended approval of said amendment to delete the requirement for upper level setbacks. X (d) Granting the Variance requested will not confer on the petitioner that special privilege that is denied by the Zoning Ordinance to other lands, buildings, or structures in the same zoning district in that: The granting of the variances does not give the developer additional privileges, and only allows the developer to construct within the zoning ordinance provisions. _ X (e) The Variance, if granted, is the minimum. Variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the land, building or structure in that: Because of the narrow width, the setback variances are required. GO .U6 _X .(f) The grant of the Variance will be in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance, and will not be injurious to the neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare. The variances being granted are adjacent to the alley and the north interior yard and will not be detrimental to the neighborhood: • Note: All documents, reports, studies, exhibits.,or other written or graphic material to be submitted to the Zoning Board shall be submitted with this application. & nL I I.: f --. P.C, x �k Signature Name Adrienne F. Pardo Address 1221 Brickell Avenue Miami, Florida 33131 Telephone (305) 579-0683 Date 60 00 STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _� day of by_ Adrienne F. Pardo who is =onally JMo IQ me or who has produced as identification and whodW (did not) take an oath. Name: - - ; Notary Public -State ,of.#Io- ndaA-*Z' .� V- Commission No...: ". - ,� OF �. n;n � 13f8 My Comrtiission Ezpiret ' G`�" • - .� ' TATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADS The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day. of 19____, by of a corporation, on behalf of the corporation. He/She is personally known to me or has produced as identification and who did (did not) take an oath. Name: Notary Public -State of Florida Commission No.: My Commission Expires: STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 19 , by partner (or agent) on behalf of a partnership. He/She is personally known to me or has produced as identification and who did (did not) take an oath. Name: Notary Public -State of Florida Commission No.: My Commission Expires: 0 10 06 Exhibit "A" Variance for one ground level setback requested along the interior yard (adjacent to the existing alleyway) from the.required.l5'.-0" down to 6"-6". Variance for one upper level setback requested along the interior yard (adjacent to the existing alleyway) from the required (above 40') 1:6 slope to a max of 40' down to 6"-6". Variance for one ground level setbackrequested along the north interior yard from the required 15'-0" down to 3". Variance for one upper level setback requested along the north interior yard from the. required (above 40') 1:6 slope to a max of 40' down to 3". DISCLOSURE OF OWNERSHIP FOR CONTRACT PURCHASER 1. Legal description and street address of subject real property: See attached Exhibit "1" and "3". 2. Owner(s) of subject real property and percentage of ownership. Note: Section 2-618 of the Code of the City of Miami requires disclosure of all parties having a financial interest, either direct or indirect, in the subject matter of a presentation, request or petition to the City Commission. Accordingly, question #2 requires disclosure of shareholders of corporations, beneficiaries of trust, and/or any other interested parties, together with their addresses and proportionate interest. See attached Exhibit "4". 3. Legal description and street address of any real property (a) owned by any party listed in answer to question #2, and (b) located within 375 feet of the subject real property. None STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF NIIAMI-DADE Owner or Attorney for Owner Adrienne Friesner Pardo The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 7 day of kPILL ' 2000 by Adrienne F. Pardo, who is personally known to me or whoproduced as identification and who did (did not) take an oath. Name: Notary Public -State o B Commission No.: My Commission Expires. MIAMWIAMMIJ75 40g9L0!!.DQC/b0t= its; .!.:i�./ •,���—�L nda ' 0'r.Qrh7A a ; 4 -4 DISCLOSURE OF OWNERSIHP FOR OWNER 1. Legal description and street address of subject real property: See attached Exhibit "1 "-and "3'. 2. Owner(s) of subject real property and percentage -of ownership. Note: Section 2-618 of the Code of the City of Miami requires disclosure of all parties having a financial interest, either direct or indirect, in the subject matter of a presentation, request or petition to the City Commission. Accordingly, question #2 requires disclosure of shareholders of corporations, beneficiaries of trust, and/or any other interested parties, together with their addresses and proportionate interest. See attached Exhibit 3. Legal description and street address of any real property (a) owned by any party listed in answer to question #2, and (b) located within 375 feet of the subject real property. None � / Owner or Attorney for Owner Adrienne Friesner Pardo STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADS The foregoing instrument, was acknowledged before me this ! ' day of 2000 by Adrienne F. Pardo- who is personally known � to me or wh(� Produced as identification and who did (did not) take anoath. Name: Notary Public -State ofFlorida - Commissign No.:��- My Commission Expires: T = ' Y o. Or. ,7^ !a MUMWJAMESS/1e7M4Gq V.DOrJU2M AFFIDAVIT STATE OF FLORIDA } )SS COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE } Before me, the undersigned authority, this day personally appeared Adrienne F . Pardo who being by me first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and says: 1. That he/she is the owner, or the legal representative of the owner, submitting the accompanying application for a public hearing as required by the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, affecting the real property located in the City of Miami, as described and listed on the pages attached to this affidavit and made a part'thereof, 2. That all owners which he/she represents, if any, have given their full and complete permission for him/her to act in hisiher behalf for the change or modification of a classification or regulation of zoning as set out in the accompanying petition. 3. That the pages attached hereto and made a part of this affidavit contain the current names, mailing addresses, telephone numbers and legaidescriptions for the real property of which he/she is the owner or legal representative. 4. The facts as represented in the application and documents submitted in conjunction with this affidavit are true and correct. Further Affant sayeth not. . I Applicant's Signature STATE OF FLORIDA Adrienne F. Pardo COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADS The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of A'9 by Adrienne F . Pardo who is personal known to me at whe-hac itteed — -ids6.1fisagen and who did (did not) take an oath. �... Notary PubliaState of Florida �.' = Cr Commission No.: My Commission Expires: 0—iu -310 Owner's Name Park Place, L.L.C. Mailing Address 848 Brickell Avenue, Suite 1010, Miami, FL 33131 Zip Code Telephone Number (305) 371-5254 Legal Description: See attached Exhibit "1 Owner's Name Mailing Address Zip Code Telephone Number Legal Description: Owner's Name wiling Address Zip Code Telephone Number Legal Description: Any other real estate property owned individually, jointly, or severally (by corporation, partnership or privately) within 375 feet of the subject site is listed as follows: -NONE- Street address Legal Description None' Street Address Legal Description Street Address Legal Description OWNER'S LIST Owner's Name Brickell Investment Realty Corp. Mailing Address c% Beatriz Azcui-Diaz, Esq. 701 Brickell Ave, #2100,Miami, Fl Zip Code 33131 Telephone Number (305) 577-3257 Legal Description: See attached Exhibit "1". Owner's Name Mailing Address Zip Code Telephone Number Legal Description: Owner's Name Mailing Address Zip Code Telephone Number Legal Description: Any other real estate property owned individually, jointly, or severally (by corporation, partnership or privately) within 375 feet of the subject site is listed as follows: Street Address None Street Address Street Address Legal Description Legal Description Legal Description U-i06 EX MIT "i" Law Descelor1ov. DO MAPOP MC&LL �5,4,0,01ZIOAI 70 7,YFWPVc AI1'4A,11',.4eMRD1Ald 70 7A(6PUr;rq.6R ,60,F Re l4r A46,6 gg, Of 7,qe RISUC ReCORDS OF D IV a47&Ve .4D6 MLk7y AAUD Z075 la.4.d.410 /08, "PallISOWS W8P1P1'S1OA1',.44WRO11j6 70 IW6PL41- MMFOf, RECORDED /,c/�TBODKSIATP,4GE 21, OF I-Ne RISLIC ZCOWS OF NS RIMAO Rcf,.^ORA5 0,- adAF 421-1,117-YAWRIO4. CITY OFA414AI1,,CWR1V4. N I K4V& AM-& dFpqj Sol. I jax 3? F., .,we-, f .27 A7 AV 7W 4 ed, Iv.cr'�.:I 9 7 a rj74?lv;7rv4,WA CWM .441- Exhibit 2 PARK PLACE AT BRICKELL MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT Per City Code, Section 23-5a, Request for a Certificate of Appropriateness for ground disturbing activity in an archeological conservation area. Per City Code, Chapter 36. Construction Equipment Request for waiver of noise ordinance while under construction for continuous pours. _ . -- MUSP, per Article 17 for development of 910 residential units. MUSP, per Article 17 for a pw*iag structure of 1,374 parking spaces. MUSPr, as per Article 5, for a PUD. Special Exception as per Article 9, Section 917.1.2, to allow valet parking for restaurant up to 50% of existing off-street parking spaces. r Special Exception as per Article 6, Section 607 to snow bar/lounge open to the public within the SD-5 Dktrict. Variance, pursuant to the City Miami Zoning Ordinance 11000, as amended, Article 6, 3eciion 607, for one ground level setback requested along the interior yard (adjacent to the existing alleyway) from the required IF-0" down to 6'-611. Variance, pursuant to the City Miami Zoning Ordinance I1000, as amended, Article 6, Section 607, for one ground level setback requested along the north interior yard from the required 15'-0" down to 311. Claw n Special Permit as per Article 6, Section 607.3.1 for temporary construction fence and covered wallcway. Class H Special Permit as per Article 6, Section 6073.1 for development of new construction within a Special District Class 11 Special Permit as per_Ardele 9, Section 9U4 providing a total of 12 _ berths, six (6) berths at 12 feet x 35 feet and six (6) berths reduced to 10 feet x 20 feet where twelve 12 feet x 35 feet are required (four per pbase). Class II Special Permit as. per Article 6, Section 6073.1 for temporary construction trailer. Clan, H Special Permit to waive certain requirements of the Pedestrian Pathway. Claw II Special Permit as per Section 908.2 for screw from a public street roadway width greater than 25 feet: Class I Special Permit as per Section 91S2 for FAA clearance letter. Class i Special Permit as per Article 9, Section '906.6 for poolloutdoor recreation area Class I Special Permit as per Article 9, Section 917.2.1 to allow valet parldpg for residential uses. Class I SpeeW Permit as per Article 9, Section 9253.9 to allow development/construction/rental signage. Request for the following MUSP conditions to be required at time of shell permit instead of at issuance of foundation permit: a. The requirement to provide a letter of assurance for the Solid Waite Department; and b. The requirement to record in the Public Records a Declaration of - Covenants and Restrictions providing that the ownership, operation and maintenance of all common area and hdff ies will be by the property owner or a mandatory property owner association; and c. The requirement to record in the Public Records a unity of title or covenant in lien of unity of title. • • Request for Reservation of Downtown Development of Regional Impart (DR1) credits. a. Park Place LLC. is requesting that whb the approval of the MUSP, the City allocate DRI credits for 918 reddeWW units and 229SM square feet of retail use. Desipatiou as a phased development Peftuant to SBction 2502 of Ordinance No.11000. TnTa P.9A 0-1036 Exhibit "3" PARK PLACE, L.L.C. Property List Addresses Folio Nos, 1432 Brickell Avenue 01-0209-090-1080 South Y2 Lot 8, Lot 9 1438 Brickell Avenue 01-0209-090-1090 'Lot 10, North Y2 Lot I I 1440 Brickell Avenue 01-0209-090-1100 South V2 Lot 11, Lot 12 1450 Brickell Avenue 01-0209-090-1110 Lot 13, North V2 Lot 14., 1460 Brickell Avenue 01-0209-090- 1120 Part of Lot 14, Lot 15 1485 S. Miami Avenue 01-0209-090-1130 Lot 17, Lot 18 1475-77 S. Miami Avenue 01-0209-090-1140 Lot 19 1465 S. Miami Avenue 01-0209-090-1150 Lot 20, South V2 Lot 21 1451-55 S. Miami Avenue 01-0209-090-1160 North Y2 Lot 21, Lot 22 1443 S. Miami Avenue 01-0209-090-1170 Lot 23 1435 S. Miami Avenue 01-0209-090-1180 Lot 24, Lot 25 I SE 150- Road 01-0209-090-2010 Lot 16-A, Lot,16-B EXHIBIT "4" Contract Purchaser PARK PLACE, L.L.C. is owned by: 1. Amkin Corporation, a Florida Corporation - 90% Jose Llorens, individually owns 100% of Amkin Corp. 2. Alan 0 eda, Individually - 10% Oweer BRICKELL INVESTMENT REALTY CORP. is 100% owned by Baypoint Holdings, S.A., a Liberian corporation. Baypoint is owned as follows: 52% - GF Securities Company Limited, a Bahamian corporation 12% - Whitehunter Corporation, a Liberian, corporation 12% - News Corporation, a Liberian corporation 12% - Victory Trust Company, a Liberian corporation 12% - First Capital Corporation, a Liberian corporation Whitehunter, News, Victory and First Capital are each owned 100% by GF Securities Guillermo Fierro, individually owns 100% of GF Securities. 00-1036 PARK PLACE AT BRICKELL MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT 1450 Brickeil Avenue Directory of Project Principals Owner/Developer Park Place LLC. 848 Brickell Ave. Suite 1010 Miami, FL 33131 Telephone: (305) 371-5254 Architecture: Bermello, Namii & Partners, Inc. 2601 South Bayshore Drive Suite 1000 Miami, FL 33133 Telephone: (305) 859-2050 Fax: (305) 860-3700 Willy Bermello Telephone 860-3735 Fax: (305) 860-3700 Willy Bermello@bamiami.com Tere C. Garcia Telephone (305) 860-3758 Fax: (305) 859-7666 Tere_ Garcia@bamiami.com Scott Bakos Telephone: (305) 860-3710 Fax: (305) 859-7666 Scott Bakos@bamiami.com Landscape Architecture: Elizabeth Newland Telephone: (305) 860-3729 Fax: (305) 859-7666 Elizabeth_Newland@bamiami.com Civil: Oliverio Sanchez Telephone: (305) 860-3755 Fax: (305) 859-9638 Oliverio_Sanchez@bamiami.com Traffic: Jackson M. Ahlstedt P.E . 46 N.W. 94h Street Miami Shores, FL 33150 Telephone: (305) 754-8695 Fax: (305) 754-8695 Economist: Sharpton, Brunson 8 Company, P.A. 1 S.E. Third Avenue, Suite 2100 Miami, FL 33131 Telephone: (305) 374-1574 Fax: (305) 372-8161 Darryl Sharpton Dks@abccpa.com • . • --r- - Attorneys: Greenberg Traurig P.A. 1221 Brickell Avenue Miami, FL 33131 Adrienne Friesner Pardo, Esq. Telephone: (305) 579-0633 Fax: (305) 961-5683 Pardoa@gfiaw.com Park Place At Brickel Major Use Special Per Zoning Ordinance no. 11000 1. Section 1304.1.1 Application forms; supplementary materials (a) Statements of ownership and control of the proposed development of activity. The Disclosure of Ownership and Ownership Affidavit are provided in Article I. (b) Statement describing in detail the character and intended use of the development or activity. Park Place at Brickell is a dynamic mixed use phased development providing a grand total of 918 units, 22,823 square feet of ground retail and 1,374 parking spaces. The project will consist of three (3) phases. Together, the three (3) phases will create a coherent single project, although each phase will also have the ability to function independently as well. Phase One consists of 286 residential units, 4,232 square feet of ground floor retail and 438 parking spaces. Phase Two consists of 308 residential units, 11,173 square feet of ground floor retail and 514 parking spaces. Phase Three consists of 324 residential units, 7,418 square feet of retail and 422 parking spaces. The project is located on Brickell Avenue in the transition zone between the financial and high rise residential districts. The property abuts three streets: Brickell Avenue to the east, South Miami Avenue to the west, and SE 15"' Road to the south. The north side of the property is adjacent to other interior properties. The property consists of a net lot area of 157,177 square feet or 3.608 acres. The gross lot area is 220,664 square feet or 5.066 acres. The property is located within the SD-5 Zoning District. The property is proximate to the major employment centers of downtown Miami, the City of Coral Gables, and the City of Miami Beach. Its proximity and quick access to transportation networks, including transit, will allow residents to quickly commute to employment centers within the region. A recent study commissioned by the Downtown Development Authority indicates that the potential demand for rental housing in Downtown Miami and the Brickell area is strong. Potential demand for the entire downtown area is estimated at 5,421 units for the period between 1997 and 2005. The Brickell area accounts for approximately 34% of this demand. Recent studies have found that renters in the Brickell area are looking for projects that contain amenities such as security, parking garages, noteworthy architecture, and recreational facilities that are affordable to young professionals. { Park Place at Brickell, when completed, will consist of three towers of varying heights: Phase One, with 33 floors at 376'-4", containing 256 residential units; Phase Two, with 39 floors at 420'-8", containing 328 residential units, and; Phase Three, with 41 floors at 463,-10", containing 334 residential units. All three Towers rise above the ground floor, seven stories of parking, and a recreation deck. Together, the base and three towers will create a "stepping" effect, progressing 00--iudb #,voi, riiaac vlic at a total Or JJ Stones, F'hase.Two at 37 stories, and Phase Three at 40 stories. The parking gars for Phase Two, which is located on fl two (2) through eight (8), is buffered from Brickell Av by 42 residential units, a feature tham, Viso creates an architecturally unique facade along one of Miami's signature thoroughfares. The ground level incorporates retail uses such as restaurants, cafes, convenience stores and specialty boutiques that will cater to residents of Park Place and the surrounding neighborhood. This project will provide a more affordable housing alternative for. moderate -income professionals in the Brickell area, a market that is presently underserved. The supply of apartments in this area has recently increased, although for the most part these developments cater to higher income'professionals, leaving a market void that Park Place will fill. The retail area is primarily oriented to Brickell Avenue and South Miami Avenue. The remaining frontage along these streets and S.E. 15" Road consists of the tower lobbies, drop-off and pick-up areas, and vehicular entrance and exits to and from the parking garages. There is a pedestrian entrance lobby on the north comer of Brickell Avenue which serves both the 42 units associated with the parking garage levels, and that serves as a "Brickell Entrance" for all three towers with direct tenant access to the 9'" level recreational deck. The vehicular parking garage entrances and exits for each tower function independently from the drop-off and pick-up areas for each tower lobby. This prevents parking garage traffic from interfering with drop-off or pick-up traffic, thus creating a more efficient vehicular transportation flow. The Phase One and Two parking garages are accessible from South Miami Avenue, while Phase Three is accessible from S.E. 15' Road. These locations prevent vehicular traffic associated with the parking garages from directly accessing Brickell Avenue. Each lobby drop-off and pick-up area includes a covered area to provide shelter during inclement weather. All entrance drives feature specialty concrete patterns and provide careful attention to detail to provide a rich experience for both the tenant and visitor. Beyond the building's perimeter, the sidewalk area will be lined with a combination of both shade and palm trees, specialty pavers, landscape furniture and sculpture to ,provide a true urban streetscape experience. All parking garages have security -controlled gates with card key access for tenants and passes for guests, and dedicated elevators providing access to the lobbies. A security. desk in the lobby separates these elevators from tower elevator banks. Additionally, all units feature telephone entry and intrusion alarm systems. The seven level parking garages provide a total of 1,374 parking spaces, which supports the residential and retail component of the development. The ninth floor houses the private recreational deck, which consists of both indoor and outdoor amenities. The recreational deck is designed to provide three separate functional decks for each phase, or a single "super -recreational deck" that all three phases can share. The ground floor of the parking garages house utility facilities such as the Florida Power & Light transformer vault, and the main electrical, mechanical, trash, and telephone rooms. These spaces are centrally located within the; ground floor, and are buffered from adjacent streets by retail, restaurants, lobbies and garage entrances. These areas are accessible from the existing alleyway linking 14th Street and Brickell ,Avenue. Drawings showing the architectural character of the project (elevation and renderings), and the location of intended uses on the site plan are included `under Tab 6 of the supporting documents. (c) General locatilonap, showing relation of the site glictivity for which special permit is sought to major streets, schools, existing utilities, shopping areas, important physical features in and adjoining the project or activity and the like. The following exhibits are included with the Major Use Special Permit Application: (1) Aerial: Aerial photograph of the surrounding area indicating the project site. (2) Area Context Map/Site Aerial: Map of the project area indicating buildings that surround the site. (3) Location Map: Map of the surrounding street system indicating the project location. (d) A site plan containing the title of the project and the names of the project planner and developer, date, and north arrow and, based on an exact survey of the property drawn to a scale of sufficient size to show. The projects developer is Park Place, LLC. The architects, planners and engineers are Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. The general information requested is shown under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. Several drawings include the following information: (1) Boundaries of the project, any existing streets, buildings, watercourses, easements and section lines. The boundaries and the location of existing streets and easements are shown on the Boundary Survey located under Tab 5 of the Supporting Documents. (2) Exact location of all buildings and structures. - The exact location of all existing buildings located on the property is shown on the Boundary Survey under Tab 5. The location of the buildings to be constructed is shown under Tab 6 of. the Supporting Documents. (3) Access and traffic flow and how vehicular traffic -will be separated from pedestrian and other types of traffic. The vehicular parking garage entrances and exits for each tower function independently from the drop-off and pick-up areas for each tower lobby. This prevents parking garage traffic from interfering with drop-off or pick-up traffic, creating a more efficient vehicular transportation flow. The Phase One and Two parking garage is accessible from South Miami Avenue, while Phase Three is accessible from SE 15'h Road. These locations prevent vehicular traffic associated with the parking garages from directly accessing Brickell Avenue. Each lobby drop-off and pick- up area includes a covered area to provide shelter during inclement weather. All entrance drives feature specialty concrete patterns and a careful attention to detail to provide a rich experience for both the tenant and visitor. Beyond the building's perimeter, the existing sidewalk area is lined with a combination of both shade and palm trees, specialty pavers, landscape furniture and sculpture to provide a true urban streetscape experience: A detailed analysis of the site access and traffic flow is provided in the Traffic impact Analysis located under Tab 2 of the Supporting Documents. 3 o-1 U (4) Off stree&king and off street, loading areas.* The off street parking structures are located on the second to eighth floors of the buildings: it contains seven (7) levels of parking with 1,374 parking spaces including 31 handicapped spaces. The plans for the off street parking facility are provided under, Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. The Zoning Ordinance requires four (4)-loading bays of 12 ft. x 35 ft for each phase- A request for a Class II permit is included to be able to provide six (6) bays at 12 ft. X 35 ft and a reduction of six (6) bays at 10 ft. X 20 ft. The ground floor of the parking garage houses utility facilities such as the Florida Power & Light transformer vault, and the main electrical, mechanical, trash, and telephone rooms, These spaces are centrally located within the ground floor,and are buffered from adjacent streets by retail, restaurants, lobbies and garage entrances. These areas are accessible from the existing �..alleyway linking 14th Street and Brickell Avenue. Service areas are shown under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (5) Recreational facilities locations. At the ninth floor of the building is a recreation deck for the development including indoor and outdoor amenities. The indoor recreational facilities include men's and women's exercise and aerobic .rooms overlooking the open air recreation terrace. There is a 50-foot lap pool and a water feature in the center of the terrace with Royal Palms framing the pool and the sitting area. There is a continuous trellis encircling the open-air'deck. There are 4 comer cabanas with BBQ facilities. These cabanas are covered. The facilities are for the use of the residents and are accessed from each of the elevator lobbies and the Brickell Avenue lobby. The recreation terrace is shown under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (6) Screens and buffers. An elegant streetscape bringing pedestrians into the neighborhood and the project is conceived for Brickell Avenue, S. Miami Avenue, and SE 15 Road. The plaza at S. Miami Avenue reacts to Simpson Park across the street, and is depressed and lined with shade trees and shrubs to create a "pedestrian hideaway". The plaza at Brickell Avenue is an open "urban" plaza responding to Brickell Avenue and its "metropolitan experience". The landscaping and buffer.area details are under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (7) Refuse collections areas. Waste collection will be. provided by a containerized compactor system located within the service area in each residential tower. In addition, each floor of all three (3) towers will have chutes servicing trash and recycling, and each tower will have a ground floor self-contained trash compactor unit and,a cardboard recycling bin.. These facilities are shown under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents.. 4 UUT iu (8) Access to utilities anoints of utility hookups. Access and connections to site utilities are discussed in the Site Utility Study located under Tab 3 of the Supporting Documents. (e) Tabulations of total gross acreage in the project and the percentages thereof proposed to be devoted to: (1) The various permitted uses. The various permitted uses include residential, parking, retail and office. A detailed list of the uses included in the project is as follows: Residential building Parking garage Recreational Deck Retail Open area, plazas and exterior courts (2) Ground coverage by structures. Ground coverage by the structures is 53% of the total gross lot area. (f) Tabulation showing the following: (1) The derivation of numbers of off street parking and off street loading spaces shown in (d) above. The total number of off street parking spaces provided is 1,374 spaces. Derivation of the numbers of off street parking is shown under Project Criteria, located under Tab 6. (2) Total project density in dwelling units per acre. Total project density is 254 units per acre where 500 units per acre is permitted. (g) If common facilities (such as recreation areas of structures, private streets, common open space, etc.) are to be provided for the development, statements as to how such common facilities are to be provided and permanently maintained. All common facilities provided will be maintained by the Owner. (h) Storm drainage and sanitary sewerage plans. Storm drainage, water distribution, waste water and solid waste generation provisions are discussed in the Site Utility Study located under Tab 3 of the Supporting Documents. (1) Architectural definitions for buildings in the development; exact number of dwelling units, sizes and types, together with typical floor plans of each type. Detailed information and breakdown of square footage of all uses are found under Project Criteria included under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. Typical floor plans for the residential units as well as all elevations and sections are located under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. 5 - 065 Plans for si ns*n U) 9 Y The project will include "signature" signs for the residential buildings as well as for the retail area. A package of uniform design guidelines will be submitted to ensure that signs are uniformly designed. (k) Landscaping plan, including types, sizes and locations of vegetation and decorative shrubbery, and showing provisions for irrigation and future maintenance. The landscape plans are found under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (1) Plans for recreation facilities, if any, including location and general description of building for such use. A private recreation deck for. the development, including indoor and outdoor amenities, is located at the ninth floor of the building. The indoor recreational facilities include men's and women's exercise and aerobic rooms overlooking the open air recreation terrace. There is a 50-foot lap pool and a water feature in the center of the terrace with. Royal Palms framing the pool and the sitting area. There is a continuous trellis encircling the open-air deck. There.are 4 comer cabanas with BBQ facilities. These cabanas are covered. The facilities are for the use of the residents and are accessed from the elevators through a ninth floor lobby. The recreation terrace is shown under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (m) Such additional data, maps, plans, or statements as may be required for the particular use or activity involved. The details of the spaces and calculations used to compute the Floor Area Ratio (FAR) are shown on the FAR plans under Tab 6 of the Supporting: Documents. The drawings covering, the roof and mechanical, electrical and plumbing rooms are included under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (n) Such additional data as the; Applicant, may believe. is pertinent to the proper consideration of the site and development plan. Sections and elevations depicting the architectural character of the building as well as floor plans showing the parking garage, the service areas. and the retail and residential units are located under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. 2. Section 1702.2.1 General Report . (1) Property ownership or ownership and beneficial interest within the boundaries of the area proposed for Major Use Special Permit. Statement of Ownership and beneficial interest within the. boundaries of the area proposed for Major Use Special Permit is provided in Article I, (2) The nature of the unified interest or control. The nature of unified interest or control is indicated in Article I. .(3) Survey of the proposed area showing properiyaines and. ownership. A copy of the Boundary Survey is included under Tab 5 of the Supporting Documents. 6 00-io3c i . (4) Map of existing features, including streets, alleys, easements, utilities' lines, existing land use, general topography and physical features. The existing site features and utility lines are shown on the Boundary Survey of the property located under Tab 5. The site features and the utilities are also described in the Site -Utility Study, located under Tab 3 of the Supporting Documents. (5) Materials to demonstrate the relationship of the elements listed in (4) preceding to surrounding area characteristics. The Drawings submitted with this Application are located under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (6) Existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan designations for the area on and around the lands proposed for Major Use Special Permit. The existing zoning designation for the property pursuant to City of Miami Ordinance No. 11000, is SD-5 (Brickell Area Residential -Office District). Page 37 of the Zoning Atlas Map is located in Article 1, and indicates the existing and surrounding zoning. The comprehensive plan future land use designation for the property is Restricted Commercial. The zoning and the comprehensive plan designation are consistent with one another. 3. Section 1702.2.2 Major Use Special Permit Concept Plan. (a) Relationships of the concept plan to surrounding, existing and proposed future uses, activities, systems, and facilities (transportation, recreation, . view corridors, pedestrian systems, service systems and similar uses). Article II contains a written narrative of this project outlining proposed uses, activities and architectural character. This narrative also contains descriptions of the project's relationship to traffic, pedestrian movements, and transportation access. Building_:Q evations and sections showing the proposed materials, vertical profile and height, and orientation to streets is included in the Drawings submitted with this Application. The list of Drawings submitted is found under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (b) Existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan principles and designations. This project conforms to the SD-5 (Brickell Area Residential -Office District) zoning district designated for this property. The comprehensive plan future land use designation conforms to the land use designation currently in effect for this property. 4. Section 1702.2.3 Developmental Impact Study (a) A traffic analysis shall be submitted for an area within approximately 1/4-mile of the site, or an area including the major intersections to be impacted by the site, whichever is larger. The Traffic Impact Analysis is included under Tab 2 of the Supporting Documents. 7 v0-.03(J" (b) Economic impact data shall be provided, Including estimates for construction costs, construction employment and permanent employment and shall demonstrate that the proposed development Is favorable to the economy, public services, environment and housing supply of the City. The Economic Impact Study is included under Tab 4 of the Supporting Documents. (c) A housing impact assessment. There will be 918 residential units within the development. The average rental price will range from $1,100 to $2,000 per month. (d) A description of proposed energy conservation measures shall be provided, including only those measures that are proposed in addition to the minimum requirements in State Energy Code. Architecturally, the building envelope will be comprised of insulated wails and roof. Lightly tinted glass will be used throughout the building. Electrically, all exterior and landscape lighting will be controlled by means of time docks and photocell switches. Energy saving lamps, ballasts and fixtures are being considered at cores and public spaces. (e) Historic Buildings There are no existing historic structures located on the property. (f) Environmental Impacts The property is located within an archaeological preservation district. 8 NOV-16-00 THU 01:55 PH LUKACS & LUKACS, P,A, FAX NO, 305 856 9601 P, 01/03 LuxAcs & LCKACS, P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 1825 CORAL 'JJAY • SUII"E iC2 MIAMI, GI.UItIUA 33145.2730 JOHN LUKACS MIAMI (305) 656.9600 JOHN CHARL.F.F LUKACS TFLFOOPLFR (305) B56-9601 KOeIN ALAN LVKACG MARYANNE LUKACS *** FACSIMILE COVER SHEET *** Date: November 16, 2000 From: John Lukacs, Esquire Fax #: (305) 856-9601 [Miami] Voice #: QQQ g56-9600 [Miami *** TO THE ATTENTION OF *** Name: The Honorpbie - Walter J. Foeman Fax #: (305) 658-101 Q No, of Pages: 3 (including this cover sheet) MESSAGE: Enclosed is a letter which l have forwarded to the Mayor and Commissioner regarding an issue which comes before the committee today. I request that this letter be made a part of the Public Records. Respectfully, John Lukacs Submitted into the public recur in connection Item on ►_ 1 With Walter Foeman City Clerk LLPA File No.: none 606-04s (Page 1) - 1 0 t) NOV-16-00 THU 01;56 PM JOHN LUKACS ROBIN ALAN LUKACS MARYANNELUKAC5 November 16, 2000 LUKACS & LUKACS, P.A. FAX NO. 305 856 9601 P. 02/03 0 0 LUKACS & LTJHACS, P.A. ATTORNEYS A7 LAW 1825 CORAL WAY MIhMI. PT.ORfnA 03146.2730 City ofMianxi Commission City hall 3500 Pan American Drive Miami, Florida Ref: Park Place At Brickeil, proposed project. Gentlemen; M LAMI (a05) 856.94500 t877! 1556-90300 As a resident on South Miami Avenue for close to 30 years, I have witnessed substantial changes and steady intensification of vertical development in the Brickell area, most of which have been of a positive impact in.the immediate area as well as contributing greatly to the city at large. The proposed project to be called Park Place at SE 15' Road/Brickell/South Miami Avenue, however, seems to depart from good planning principles and common sense. The project's design will have a severely negative impact on the immediate area and the City as well and particularly on South Miami Avenue, which the planners of this project have relegated to a "back street" instead of capitalizing on its recently emerging character as a dining and entertainment plaza to the Central City, On reviewing the development site plans it is obvious that the traffic to be generated by the project's users and those it draws to it is concentrated heavily on South Miami Avenue, as of necessity due to the size and configuration of the site. For example, the depicted "18-wheeler" in the mid -block alley ( 20 feet wide) apparently there to deliver goods to the project's tenants, is unrealistic as acceptable commercial vehicular loading and unloading and access. For such service vehicles to gain access to the site, SE 14' Street which is only 51 feet wide, will necessarily become the funnel through which they must pass. The trd is tie-ups and congestion which will occur there is somewhat mind-bogglirig. This principal entryway is much too narrow to accommodate the size and frequency of these vehicles as well as the numerous service vehicles and emergency vehicles inherent to such a large project. South Miami Avenue from SE 25'� Road to SE 15" Road is a divided roadway, one of two of the most beautiful boulevards in our city. South Miami Avenue is only a two lane street. It is inconceivable that a project of this dimension would direct some 80% to 90% of its traffic onto this street and not expect severe and destructive effects on this roadway and on the present uses fronting along its course. Submitted into the public recor�j�i2nconnection with item on l t—tb � Walter l"oeman {�7i"rN NOV-16-00 THU 01:57 PH LUKACS & LUKACS, P. A. FAX NO. 305 856 9601 P. 03/03 City of Miami Commission November 16, 2000 Page 2 Gentlemen, the Park Place project must be more carefully examined by you and the planning staff, to assure that the community itself, and not just the developer, is benefitted from the project. The site plan is specific to this irregularly shaped assembled tract and when considered as in a vacuum probably represents the maximum utility of the site, but when considered in light of the community at large and the existing neighborhood it will have a severely detrimental impact, not a City net benefit. Having had the privilege of serving on the City's Planning and Zoning Board (2 years as it's Chairperson), being among those who love and care for the City and being concerned with the direction of growth of the Brickell area, I implore your close scrutiny of the details of this project when compared with the goals and standards intended for the growth and future of Miami and the welfare of it's inhabitants. I respectfully request that this project notbe permitted to proceed as is now planned, rather, that it be deferred to another time to enable a. more introspective analysis of the effects, good and bad, on the immediate surrounds and the community at large. R e sub ' ed. JLJos F/Letters;City of Miami/11-16-00 Submitted into the public record in connection with item � on1 I <,-C,d Walter Foeman City Clerk LUKACS & LUKACS, P.A. • • PARK PLACE AT BRICKELL MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT SITE UTILITY STUDY Prepared for: Park Place LLC. Prepared by: Bermello Ajamil & Partners, Inc. Submitted into the Publia. . record in connection ,�j fh June 7, 2000m� on Connection Water Foeman City Clerki Go-i' • • I. DRAINAGE A. Drainage Area PARK PLACE SubMitred . SITE UTILITY STUDY record an "0 the public item connection with Walter Foeman City Clerk This property consists of two parcels bounded by Brickell Avenue, south Miami Avenue and S. E. 1511 Road. The parcels are separated by an alley which runs in a north -south direction from S.E. 15" Road. The property will be developed in three phases. The table below shows the net land area of each development phase: PHASE SQUARE ACREAGE FOOTAGE Phase 1 Phase II Phase III (34,315) (64,687) 56 175 (0.83) (1.49) TOTALS 155,177 3.6 After development, approximately 95% of each parcel will be impervious areas and approximately 5% of the sites will remain as pervious areas. The storm water discharge will consist primarily of building roofs, driveways and landscape areas run-off. The coefficient of run-off is arrived at as follows: (0.95 (impervious) x 0.90 +0.05 (pervious) x 0.30 overall coefficient B. Existing Drainage System = 0.855 = 0.015 0.870 Three different jurisdictions operate and maintain the three roadways fronting on the parcels. The table below shows the jurisdiction responsible for each street. All existing roadway drainage systems appear to be of sufficient capacity to handle the present conditions. JURISDICTION STREET NAME Florida Department of Transportation Brickell Avenue Miami -Dade County Public Works South Miami Avenue City of Miami Public Works S.E. 151h Road 60-io"a • SITE UTILITY STUDY Page 2 C. Proposed Drainage System The primary drainage system of these buildings will consist of drainage wells which will allow the stormwater runoff to be fully contained on -site. No off -site runoff is anticipated from this project. It is anticipated that a total of 16 drainage wells will be required to handle the.runoff. Table 1 shows both a typical drainage calculation (Phase 1) and a breakdown of the wells needed for each site. The stormwater will be collected thru a system of catch basin inlets and transported by pipes to the well locations. The wells will allow the stormwater to flow into the Biscayne Aquifer. The wells will be designed to handle the stormwater runoff and they will be tested for capacity as they are installed. Runoff from driving surfaces such as driveways and parking areas will be diverted thru detention structures which will capture the oils and greases prior to flowing into the wells. Table 1 Sample .Drainage Calculations (All Phases) Runoff Generations 1. Total Net Area a. Impervious b. Pervious 6.35 Acres (3.61 land; 2.74 bldg sides ) 95% or 6.03 Acres 5% or 0.32-Acres 2. Average Runoff Coefficient (.95) (.9) + (.05) (.3) = 0.87 3. Design Storm 5 years 4. Time of Concentration 10.00 min 5. Rainfall Intensity 6.20 in/hr �6. Peak Runoff (Q) - C.,A (.87) (6.20) (6.35) = 34.25 CFS Assume each 24" diameter drainage well flows at 750 gpm per foot of head - using 2 feet of head: 2 x 750 gpm = 1,500 gpm. per well 1,500 gpm = 3.34 CFS (Peak runoff) 34.25 CFS (Flow per well) 3.34 CFS Provide 11 - 24" diameter wells Detention Tank: 10.25 Wells = Submitted into the iteCo in connect; Public on m with falter Foeman City �a,e "3� • • f�J SITE UTILITY STUDY Page 3 .Providing 1'/z minute detention time of storage in tank. Volume of tank required to handle 1,500 gpm for 1.5 min. 1,500 gpm x 1.5 min = 2,250 gal/tank or 300 ft3 Provide 11 tanks w/300 ft3 volume each PHASE NUMBER OF WELLS Phase 1 Future Phase II Future Phase III 3 4 4 H. WATER DISTRIBUTION The Miami Dade Water and Sewer Department owns and operates a system of water mains on all the streets fronting the various parcels. Brickell Avenue has a 20" and a 6" water main. South Miami Avenue has a 6" and a 16" main, and a 12" water main exists on S.E. 155h Road. There are four hydrants within a 200 feet distance of the proposed buildings. The water connections to serve each building will be done from one of the mains fronting each site. The calculations for anticipated water volumes required for this project are shown below, in Table 2. Table 2 Water Volumes Phase I Residential Apartments 256 apartments @ 200gpd .......................... 51,200 gpd Retail 4,232 ft2 @ 5 gpd/100 ft2 ............................... 212 gpd Total Phase 1.......................................... 51,412 gpd Submitted Into the reC® connectionpublic in items� h on Walter Foeman a le`&� � 3 6 0 ' 0 • SITE UTILITY STUDY Page 4 Phase 11 Residential Apartments 328 apartments @200 gpd/unit ...................... 65,600 gpd Retail 11,173 ft2 @ 5 gpd/100 ft2 .............................. 560 gpd Total Phase11.......................................... 66,160 gpd Residential Apartments 334 apartments @200 gpd/unit ...................... 66,800 gpd Retail 7,418 ft2 @ 5 gpd/100 ft2 ............................... 371 gpd Total Phase III ......................................... 67,171 gpd III. SANITARY SEWER The Miami Dade Water and Sewer Department owns and operates a gravity sewer system along all the alley between these properties. It is anticipated that individual gravity connections to the gravity lines will be sufficient to serve this project. No pump station will be built on -site to serve the project. Table 3, below, shows the anticipated sewage flow calculations. Table 3 Sewage Flows Phase I Phase II Phase III Average Flow (from Table 2) 51,412 gpd 66,160 gpd 67,171 gpd Average Flow 35.70 gpm 45.94 gpm 46.65 gpd Peak Flow ( x 4.5) 156 gpm 206 gpm 220 gpd Sob1nittect recoP into th o� in Connect�o public on with City �ln 0`in0b • 0 SITE UTILITY STUDY Page 5 IV. SOLID WASTE GENERATION Solid waste generated by this project will be collected in standardized on -site containers for refuse and recyclables. Regular pick-up service will be provided by either private hauling companies and/or The City of Miami Solid Waste Department, who will transport the waste to Metro -Dade County's Disposal or Recycling facilities. The projected daily volumes of solid waste generation are shown in Table 4, below. Table 4 Solid Waste Generation Phase I Residential Apartments (256 apts. @ 1.42 Tons x 2,000/365 days ................ 2,225 Ibs Retail (16,000 ft2 @ 3.08 Ibs/ft2)/365 days 36 Ibs Total (Phase 1) ........................................... 2,261lbs Phase II Residential Apartments (328 units X 1.42 tons x 2,000 Ibs/ton)/365 ............... 2,396 Ibs Retail (11,173 ft2 x 3.08 Ibs/ft2)/365 ............................ 94 Ibs Total Phase 11..................................... :...... 2,490 lbs Phase II Residential Apartments (334 units X 1.42 tons x 2,000 Ibs/ton)/365 ............... 2,521 Ibs Retail (11,173 ft2 x 3.08 Ibs/ft2)/365 ............................ 63 Ibs Total Phase III ........................................... 2,584 Ibs • Suornitted Into the Ptatalic recor in connection with item on A:::� Walter Foeman city Gwk 0®-10"3 • PARK PLACE AT BRICKELL MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY Prepared for: Park Place LLC. Prepared by: Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. June 7, 2000 Submitted into the public recorA in connection with item ju_ on 11- Walter Foeman City Clerk 1' • 0 PARK PLACE ECONOMIC AND TAX IMPACT STUDY SUBMITTED TO: CITY OF MIAMI PREPARED FOR: Park Place, L.L.C. PREPARED BY: SHARPTON, BRUNSON & COMPANY, P.A. One Southeast Third Ave. Suite 2100 Miami, Florida 33131 (305) 374-1574 Su''"tted ! June 2000 r'ecoL into the Public -item n connocti,,, on.� -G ita Walter F oeMan City Ce►k 00-10,0016 • • PARK PLACE PROJECT OVERVIEW � S�bn,l�e. rece into Itj item I n c ®nnecti � Public on —n with VValteo�` ema City Cierk 60-103 • PROJECT OVERVIEW The proposed project consists of 918 condominium units, 22,823 square feet of retail space and 1,374 parking stalls. This project is located on Brickell Avenue, bounded by SE 15th Street to the south and South Miami Avenue to the west, in the city of Miami, Florida (the Project). The project is located in the transition zone between the financial and high-rise residential districts. Additionally; it is close in proximity to downtown Miami, the City of Coral Gables and the City of Miami Beach. The project will be developed in three phases, or tower. Each tower will contain residential units, ground floor retail, a recreational deck and parking spaces. Additionally, each tower will differ in height due to the variation in residential units. Construction is expected to commence by late-2001 and to be completed by mid- 2007. Submittca . recor into the public ifem in connection on =mil ralPh Walter Foem n CItY Clerk Park Place — Economic Impact Study Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. June 2000 00-106 11 • PROJECT OVERVIEW • • PARK PLACE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Submitted into the reo,�r4 in public _Item onnection wiftt on _ Walter l=oeman City Clerk Park Place — Economic Impact Study Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. June 2000 036 INTRODUCTION This document represents an in-depth economic and tax benefits analysis of the development and operation of a three -tower first class condominium complex with retail -facilities. The Project will have access from two main thoroughfares with elegant driveways and entry lobbies at SE 15th Street and South Miami Avenue. The master plan currently contemplated for the site is comprised of a phased development of the following components: ❑ 918 units of high -quality condominiums. ❑ 22,823 square feet of retail. ❑ 1,374 parking stalls. Phase I of the master plan will be comprised of retail, lobby area, administration offices, and parking on the ground floor; parking from the 2"d through the 8th floors; building amenities and recreation deck on the 9th floor; and high -quality residences from the 10th through the 33rd floors of the tower. Construction is expected to commence in the last quarter of 2001 and to be completed in the first quarter of 2003. It will consist of the following uses: ❑ 256 units of high -quality residences. ❑ Approximately 4,232 square feet of retail. o Approximately 438 parking spaces. Phase II of the master plan will be comprised of retail, lobby area, administration offices, and parking on the ground floor; parking from the 2Id through the 8th floors; building amenities and recreation deck on the 9th floor; and high -quality residences from the 10th through the 37th floors of the tower. Construction is expected to commence in the second quarter of 2003 and to be completed in the first quarter of 2005. It will consist of the following uses: ❑ 328 units of high -quality residences. ❑ Approximately 11,173 square feet of retail. ❑ Approximately 514 parking spaces. Phase III of the master plan will be comprised of retail, lobby area, administration offices, and parking on the ground floor; parking from the 2"d through the 8th floors; building amenities and recreation deck on the 9th floor; and high -quality residences from the 10th through the 40th floors of the tower. Construction is expected to commence in the second quarter of 2005 and to be completed in the second quarter of 2007. It will consist of the following uses: ❑ 334 units of high -quality residences. Submitted into the public ❑ Approximately 7,418 square feet of retai�ecor in connection with ❑ Approximately 422 parking spaces. item This analysis encompasses the entire Project and estimates the ecoX'AZ Frn"d_ "ta¢'x benefits for both its developmental and operational phases. City Clerk Park Place — Economic Impact Study June 2000 Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. G U— 101 3 6 • • • • LJ SUMMARY OF BENEFITS The Project will bring significant economic benefits to the city of Miami (the City). This section summarizes the impact of the Project on employment, public sector revenues and other economic benefits as a result of the development. Employment Employment considerations include the direct employment resulting from the Project. Average developmental construction phase employment will be for approximately 375 employees. Employees for on -going maintenance and operations of the facilities as well as businesses leasing retail space in the building are estimated to employ 160 people. Wages To compute the wages associated with the new employment we started with budgeted data directly related to the developmental and operational phases of the Project, and we incorporated data from our research on retail sales. Tax Revenue The estimate of the public sector revenues associated with the development includes taxes and other revenues generated directly by the Project. Although public sector costs are important elements in measuring fiscal impact, these benefits have not been quantified in this document. This analysis only measures the benefits derived from the development. Annual tax revenue expected to be created totals $3,335,475. ' Economic Impact The estimate of total economic impact is measured by total output, inclusive of wages and taxes. This analysis measures the economic impact of developmental costs and ongoing operational expenditures. To determine the effect of respending within the City, we utilized a multiplier to compute total direct and indirect benefits. Total output expected to be generated, as a result of the developmental and operational phases of the Project will approximate the following: One Time Annual $243,054,623 $ 30,181, 054 Submitted into the public lreco in connection Item o' —%�0 6 Walter Foeman City Clerk Park Place — Economic Impact Study Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. June 2000 SUMMARY OF BENEFITS ® Significant Community Benefits: • Jobs • Wages • Taxes • Economic Activity Condominium Residents' and Retail Business Employees' spending impacting Local Businesses: ❑ Recreation/Entertainment • ❑ Transportation o Retail SubMitle d in►° PSG° in c°n tie Ptlb►►c it ne` hun • with _r. Walter !� °eman City C►..,k Park Place — Economic Impact Study June 2000 Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. a� ,-„ • • • SUMMARY OF BENEFITS The following table and charts summarize the economic impact of the PARK PLACE development: CONSTRUCTION PERIOD IMPACT ANNUAL RECURRING Economic Activity Stimulated Output $190,292,731 $22,682,802 Wages 52,761,892 4,162,777 Taxes 3,335,475 Total $243,054,623 $30,181,054 Jobs Created 375 160 Economic Activity Stimulated $200,000,000 $150,000,000 $50,000,000 $0 Constuction Period Ooutput ■Wages Economic Activity Stimulated $25,000,000 $20,000,000 $15,000,000 $10,000,000 $5,000,000 $0 Annual Recurring i]Output ■Wages OTaxes Submitted Into the public recor in connection with Ifem — on Walter Foeman City Clerk Park Place — Economic Impact Study Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. June 2000 • PARK PLACE OBJECTIVES AND DEFINITIONS Subrnit ed into record in the Public _item onoectioo With on !�/�® Walter Foeman City Cleric —1036 OBJECTIVES AND DEFINITIONS 0 Objectives The objective of this analysis is to provide information on the various benefits created by the Project and to prepare an estimate of such benefits to the City. Our analysis is based on an economic model, which estimates economic and tax impacts of various projects on a designated area. The model is specifically tailored to the City. Definition of Economic and Tax Impact The construction and subsequent operation of the Project will create important benefits within the City. These benefits include new income, new jobs, new tax revenue and new economic activity impacting upon every sector of the local economy. Moreover, through the multiplier effect of respending and reinvesting, indirect economic benefits are added to the direct benefits brought about by initial construction expenditures, the expenditures from ongoing operations and new spending at the retail enterprises. Direct and Indirect Effects The total. economic impact of public and private projects and policies on a region does not end with the impact from the initial construction expenditures; the continued benefits to the local economy must also be considered. Income to firms furnishing construction materials and services is subsequently converted into employee salaries, material purchases, investment in plant and equipment, savings, profits, purchases of services, and a variety of other economic activities. Income to laborers is subsequently respent for purchasing of food, housing, transportation, entertainment, education, medical and dental services, clothing, personal services, and a wide variety of other goods and services. Furthermore, income to governmental unit is respent as salaries, purchases, and support of a variety of programs, including education, transportation, and social services. In turn, individuals, firms, and governments furnishing these goods and services again spend their income for more purchases, salaries, investments, and savings. In this manner, indirect benefits result each time the initial sum is respent, and the additional sum available in the local economy induces further job creation, business development and savings. Quantification of these indirect benefits has been the object of considerable economic study. Because economic relationships are so complex in our modern society, no single area or political unit is a completely self-contained economic unit. Therefore, purchases from other areas and political units are necessary, and goods services are exported in return. Submitted into recor n connection public �,� action with " on _LE - Walter Foeman Park Place — Economic Impact Study siy C1erk une 2000 Sharpton, Brunson &Company, P.A. J0— OBJECTIVES AND DEFINITIONS As purchases are made from other units, some of the benefits of economic respending are lost to the local economy. Ultimately, a smaller and smaller portion of the initial sum would remain, until, after several rounds of respending, an insignificant sum is left. The indirect effects can be viewed as a set of "ripples" in the economy. Indirect, like direct, resources require labor, materials, equipment and services for their c c: production to induce further job creation and spending of wages. a c� o UThe "ripple" of the indirect effect multiplies the original impact of the purchase. The ®► L common measure of the magnitude of the "ripple" effect is called a multiplier. A " �� g` vmultiplier measures the total magnitude of the impact on each particular economic c o indicator as a multiple of the initial, direct effect. For instance, a multiplier of "1" ,� 0 would signify no "ripple" effects as the total impact is 1 times the initial impact, while ,E a multiplier of "2" would imply that the total impact is 2 times the direct effect. v v The actual magnitude of a multiplier depends on the likelihood the goods and to D 0 services purchased in a region would be produced in, or provided from the region. r The model we used to estimate the total economic impact incorporates a multiplier developed by utilizing past consumption and production patterns in the City. • There will be significant economic benefit derived from the expenditures of the residents of the Project on eating, drinking, grocery, recreation, retail etc. This report does not include the economic impact of such expenditures. • Measures of Economic Impact Various measures can be used to indicate the impact of a policy or project on a region. Specifically, for this study, they are the increases in local employment, wages, tax revenue and output that result. Definitions of these measures are as follows: ❑ Employment is measured in full -time -equivalent jobs. ❑ Wages include wages, salaries, and proprietor's income only. They may include non -wage compensation, such as pensions, insurance, and other fringe benefits. Wages are assumed to be expended by households in the area at which the wage earners work. ❑ Local taxes include additional revenues from both ad valorem and non ad valorem assessments. ❑ Direct Expenditures include those 'sums expended for land acquisition, site preparation and all hard and soft costs associated with a project. Park Place — Economic Impact Study June 2000 Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. — 03 • • • OBJECTIVES AND DEFINITIONS ❑ Indirect Expenditures are those sums expended within the local economy as a _result of the "ripple" effect described earlier. ❑ Output describes total economic activity, and is essentially equivalent to the sum of direct and indirect expenditures (exclusive of wages and taxes). Description of Results For the purpose of describing the total economic benefits of the Project, the related expenditures and economic activity stimulated have been broken into two categories: 1) Developmental 2) Annual Recurring Developmental expenditures include those expenditures related to the design and construction phase of the Project and related amenities. Annual recurring'activities stimulated are those expenditures incurred in connection with the ongoing operation of the Project, and the sales and expenditures of the retail enterprises leasing space at the Project. Submitted into the public rotor in connection item with on �I G rcx� Walter Foeman City Clerk Park Place — Economic Impact Study June 2000 Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. 36 • • • PARK PLACE DISCUSSION OF THE RESULTS BY ECONOMIC INDICATORS Submitted intothe Public itemkin connection conn on h Walter Foeman CRY Cleric 00-1036 0 0 '.7 • DISCUSSION OF THE RESULTS BY ECONOMIC INDICATORS Impact Indicators We measured the Project's impact on four commonly used indicators of economic activity. Those indicators are: ❑ Jobs ❑ Wages ❑ Total output ❑ Local taxes Results of Indicators Exhibits I and II detail the Project's direct and indirect impact on the above economic indicators for Miami. A summary of such impact follows: DEVELOPMENT OUTPUT WAGES TAXES EMPLOYMENT ONE TIME Direct $ 101,039,818 $28,048,425 200 Indirect 89,252,913 24,713,467 175 Total $190,292,731 $52,761,892 375 ANNUAL Operational: Direct $ 6,799,782 $ 1,117,444 $3,335,475 45 Indirect 5,991,288 984,580 40 Retail 9,891,732 2,060,753 75 Total $ 22,682,802 $ 4,162,777 $3,335,803 160 The economic indicator most commonly measured, and publicly reported on to gauge the economic impact of a public project is output. The impact of a project on the indicator output is often referred to as the project's economic impact. Impact of Construction: The site preparation and construction expenditures, including soft costs and impact fees are estimated at $116.1 million. The workers will earn approximately $28.0 million in wages. These jobs will primarily be in construction, transportation and related service industries. Spending for site preparation and project construction will result in a total estimated impact of $190.3 million dollars. Submitted into the public recor n connection with item on/ Walter Foeman City C Pik Park Place — Economic Impact Study Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. June 2000 - ` 00 DISCUSSION OF THE RESULTS BY ECONOMIC INDICATORS Impact of Ongoing Operations and Retail Enterprises: As a result of the on -going operation and maintenance of the Project, Miami will gain approximately 95 new, permanent, full-time equivalent jobs. The wages of the workers who obtain these positions will provide an impact of approximately $2.1 million annually. The retail enterprises are estimated to create 75 permanent, full- time equivalent jobs. The wages of the workers employed by the retailers will provide an impact of approximately $2.0 million annually. The total expenditures for the Project's operations, and the retail sales will provide a new, permanent impact of $22.7 million annually to the City's economy. This impact consists of the effects of new retail sales and the direct expenditures from the operation of the Project, and the multiplied effects of such spending thus creating indirect benefits. Impact on Local Tax Revenues: As a result of the construction and operation of the Project, various state, county and city governments and agencies would gain an estimated annual tax benefit of $3.3 million. Analysis by Economic Indicators: • Our analysis of the economic and tax benefits of the Project was done by each major phase of the Project. We identified the major phases to be developmental and operational. This analysis determines ' the economic benefits to the City by identifying such benefits for each of the phases. - The effects on economic indicators used to measure benefits (employment, wages, output and taxes) were computed for each phase. Employment Employment is one of the most important economic benefits of the Project. It is one of the most accessible and direct benefits for the City's residents and is a primary means by which developmental, operational and maintenance expenditures generate indirect economic benefits. A portion of this employment occurs on -site as a result of new spending at the retail enterprises, and a portion is derived from on- going operations of the Project. As can be seen in Exhibit I, total short-term (developmental) employment will average 375 employees over a sixty-six month period and total on -going employment will average 160. The total on -going positions can be summarized as follows: ❑ Management Submitted into the ❑ Security/Parking reco Public ❑ Maintenance/Facilities �en connection with m ❑ Retail ie,_ one f--=_ Walter Foeman CierK Park Place — Economic Impact Study June 2000 Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. a U — U i DISCUSSION OF THE RESULTS BY ECONOMIC INDICATORS • Wages The analysis deemed wages are a direct by-product of employment. As discussed in the above section, both on -site and off -site jobs are created. There were both temporary and permanent in nature. To compute the wages associated with the new employment we started with budgeted data directly related to the developmental and operational phases of the Project, and we incorporated data from our research on retail sales. Employment, such as construction related employment, was obtained directly from construction estimates. These numbers were tested for reasonableness. Output The output generated, as a result of the development and operations of the Project, is caused by the following type of expenditures: ❑ Development costs expended in the City. o Annual operational expenditures of management company. ❑ New spending in the retail enterpriseslocated in the Project. Exhibit II shows a summary of the development costs expended in Miami, the operational expenditures made in relation to the on -going maintenance of the Project and the estimated sales of the retail enterprises. To incorporate the impact of dollars being respent and/or reinvested in the City, a multiplier was applied to total direct output. A multiplier of 1.8811 was used to determine total direct and indirect output created by the Project. This multiplier indicates that for every $100 spent in Miami, another $188.11 will be respent or reinvested in Miami. This multiplier was obtained from the Miami Dade County Planning Department. Direct output from the developmental phase of the Project is primarily a result of developer costs. These costs include land acquisition, site preparation and soft and hard costs relating to the Project's construction. To determine the total output we determined what development costs were expected to be or had been spent in Miami. Submitted into the public record n connection item -I�r on /-/� with Walter Foeman City Clerk Park Place — Economic Impact Study June 2000 Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. 00— 1036 DISCUSSION OF THE RESULTS BY ECONOMIC INDICATORS Total direct output during the development phase is $101 million. Total indirect output created by the direct respending in Miami is $89 million. Thus total Miami Output from the development of the Project is $190 million. The final component of output results from the direct operating expenditures of the Project, and the indirect benefits created as a result of the multiplier effect on direct output. The Developer provided us with an annual operating budget for the Project. An overall assumption was made that all expenditures would be spent initially in the City. The total operating expenditures incorporate all estimated expenses of the ongoing operation of the Project. The impact of the retail enterprises was measured separately as an economic indicator. To incorporate the potential respending and reinvesting in Miami, the multiplier effect was measured. By applying a multiplier of 1.8811 to the total direct output from operating expenditures and the retail enterprises, we determined total output (direct and indirect) from on -going operating expenditures and retail sales. Total direct output created from retail sales and operating expenditures is $12 million. Total indirect output created from retail sales and operating expenditures is . $11 million. Total output created from ongoing operations and retail enterprises is approximately $23 million. Local Taxes A key and significant benefit generated from the development and operation of the Project is taxes. Several types of tax revenue will be generated from this project including ad valorem taxes. Specific ad valorem taxes include real and personal property taxes. Other taxes include occupational taxes and community development taxes. New real property taxes will be assessed on the Project. The assessment is based on a predetermined millage rate being applied to the taxable value of the real property. We computed real property taxes for the developmental phase based on the cost of the development of the Project. This assessment base is very conservative since tax on real property typically is assessed on appraised values and not actual cost. The basis for ongoing taxes is also overall cost. The millage rate was obtained from the City Tax Collectors office relative to the Project's location. The projected annual real property taxes are approximately $3 million. Submitted into the public record in connection with m RLLL on /LL� Walter Foeman Park Place — Economic Impact Study June 2000 Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. DISCUSSION OF THE RESULTS BY ECONOMIC INDICATORS Total ad valorem taxes assessed b Miami -Dade City are allocated based on mills e Y Y 9 rates to certain governmental entities. Listed below is the allocation of projected tax revenue. AD VALOREM TAX ANNUAL REVENUE City Operating $1,102,886 City Miscellaneous 58,047 School Operating 11004,671 County Operating 674,386 Debt Service -City 162,531 Debt Service - County 94,732 South Florida Water 69,308 Library Operating 37,266 School Debt Service 114,932 Florida Inland Navigation 5,108 Environmental Projects 11,609 TOTAL $3,335,476 Although not quantified, the City, through its receipt of allocated state sales taxes will • receive an additional benefit as a result of the development and operation of the Project, and from the retail enterprises. • Public Sector Costs Impact Fees Very significant factors h measuring the economic impact on a specific region of a project are impact and other required development fees. A summary of these fees are listed below: ❑ City of Miami Developmental Impact Fee ❑ City of Miami Developmental Admin Fee ❑ Dade City Impact Fee Submitted into the public ❑ Administrative Fee recur in connection with ❑ Building Permit Fee item f � � �� on %L/( ❑ Installation Energy Fee ❑ Other Fees Walter Foeman City Clerk, For the purpose of this economic impact analysis, fees are included as a part of the direct development cost (output). Impact fees total approximately $3.4 million and other fees total approximately $2.2 million. These fees are shown in detail in Exhibit IV. Park Place — Economic Impact Study t- June 2000 6 Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. i u • r� 0 • • Exhibit I Summary of Economic Impact Exhibit II Summary of Direct Economic Benefits Exhibit III Project Development Cost Exhibit IV Impact and Other Fees EXHIBIT LIST Submitted Into the public recor in connection item - /y on ( I —IC with Walter Foeman City Clerk Park Place — Economic Impact Study Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. n 0 � � 3 June 2000 (b) Economic impact data shall be provided, including estimates for construction costs, construction employment and permanent employment and shall demonstrate that the proposed development is favorable to the economy, public services, environment and housing supply of the City. The Economic Impact Study is included under Tab 4 of the Supporting Documents. (c) A housing impact assessment. There will be 918 residential units within the development. The average rental price will range from $1,100 to $2,000 per month. (d) A description of proposed energy conservation measures shall be provided, including only those measures that are proposed in addition to the minimum requirements in State Energy Code. Architecturally, the building envelope will be comprised of insulated walls and roof. Lightly tinted glass will be used throughout the building. Electrically, all exterior and landscape lighting will be controlled by means of time clocks and photocell switches. Energy saving lamps, ballasts and fixtures are being considered at cores and public spaces. (e) Historic Buildings There are no existing historic structures located on the property. (f) Environmental Impacts The property is located within an archaeological preservation district. Submitted into the public ® recor in tonne item /y tion with --� on s►.-��i 8 Walter i=oeman City Clerk ��- 3b 0 • • PARK PLACE AT BRICKELL MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT SURVEY OF PROPERTY June 7, 2000 Submitted into record i�a connectionthe with item -_....` on t Walter F— o a City Clerk 10 r.L. .e W.V. '': ::.:,.'.:, . '..:�� �_ �--•_e• fr _ •'•; .'" "5.d'"L.P, :', :. ..'.7D'Ln.vc2fTE'St06wi[L;. ••. ... .. 'i•' - �.T-":[�i.' ::', to w.,v: .': .- �O CI. � '` i✓.V. F.H. w/r. SB. H.v. FLGOQEL£YdT/ON r Fgea/ui ��%�M� •W.v. eHy .4VE IZI ,Vr/COO /7f0 ('.r, R•'?.y� A308,5� - �t+"'i':`�"•.: ::' .. .. SO'd.SI714LT ROYEMENT '. . . ' v1a32 14'.7e v �' T-/7.74' : •;:., . U �O"LIX/CRf7E CY/R<j-nc✓ ne_ � �1•' nr • • ....-. / �.. /:�" Nr I051 - IS. B7 Nr1005 /2sa / 9A ..,, fODUD IROH yet : o rc. w ;: W E7 1 b. //--'I AS - Ir DJ�F STY. r-rw' Caw".) - 20. ev •': ��' C/ , E /-1EAN Low WAT62 � O � BAY OA7VH. � �� / � P?• -. {?', (rj / �_0 ryn,.sFf F / /yp , :5`� .oy ois 6 �• / •�•" r F •' /Fl MH.(,)I V..7Al / o ;•. 1301 N .� 10-,?YC: PARK rr� tl'I G BD/ 158' F6mE �7c. - o � ..: 2•ST _ / �• ;;V BOar / /STY.C.B.S -L 93QB' l2/Y) 102' c � \yI R ij1 1•Bry, C.B.S. �2•s7rces �u3e 37.2' XT OSB �iP0257Y.CBQ 05 Bf /STY. C.B. •-� o uw• •90' I n .12 . ►' 'V j//.. e. I I I I I. DR/✓f f SS• b l b�JGA o "W/ K1U U5 BD/V /D (R.5 5421) $n 78 J9 20 2/ 22 23 ze 25 20 V 2e'p �� ` / ; Rio• 6 SA 7 1£./ G,/d lsjfV • \ v t�' X.B � , . .. NEld aw . a, N . J,y Re r sD - _ �,,� ram, ., .• ., _ „ 51, IUSc FrA E ./ C 7-4 sso,' f60• S / lAkrw V,-4fee, ee'e r "s T / 5 Id .1 3 /2 J J /O 7 B 7 G s a 3 2 J '44 f&VD4HA OP RICW, LLb' #DD/ / T TN ,LYA OcM M/ PEi -FOUND S4'gPr, �' La-a7 edP �5' 50' 90, oUNO Yr'P/PE C C B�a7 CAP - wAu. OE107CS CORE /UCET W/7NACCESS MAUMOLE. D 0.6. AeWOTES CATCH G..S/U. n AIM. t r) DeUOTES STORM SEWER AO.VHOLE. 7A(' ' !343' O HJI.(S) DEVOTES SAD/TARP SEWER MADUD[£, ' 2/2' L � ON,H,(P) DEVOTES SOOTHERNBELL TECEPNOVCA"UVo[ E. /11Q•�)•� O M.M(E) OE[/OTES AJOR/DA PoWeR L/GNTMfdURD[E, V 0 • W.V. DEA107-65 WATER VdL.VE. W.ld, OEUOTES WdrER MFT£R. ' � i F.H. DENOTES f/RF_ HYDRdNT. ` A $R DEA/OXes S/AME5E 57AA/D P1^ S. 017.11. DEVOTES 64S VAt Ve 2'STY C$S. a 7{•. DE//OTES rELEPHOAA5 CYOSU,FE. °`D. id'/432 • WP. DEAIOrES WO00 PoLE- N 5ZD' Ill 743' .--• WP, DEVOTES WDODR 4j A410.44ellOR. O C.P. DEMOTES CLIUCRErE MLE. 17 L.P. DE/D07ES US TT POLE. .aL 07%. DFMOreS 744AI C L16H7RILE. N --C-- D£UOTES OSS L/uE PA1urA4ARKS. V• --$-• LYUOTES SEWER 4JVE Pd/UT M0RKS, 'V, y U) DEIJOTES CEU7ERLTUE. OH-yrT,•• O'- M,H1T)�. k^' +ecu lE! DEMOTES 0/7YM0DUMEUTLIUE. • rW s M f'"• P STY L.(lOTES STO.EY 3• Sou D P/ E ce•e7 (•AP ' • ` :: • L, •..1 . s .•,. •..: •• / / cols. DEMOTE^^• ecwC2E7E BLLKK ST,ej/CTURE -.- . .MH.(r'J .,•) 000CRere;s10EW.4l K::.: :�� `• - P.-' DEMOTES PAQ�••L414V 'f.' •` 'U • • Cl. 90T?IW. H, WN. - © L,T. ."o'• " F DE{/07'Es aAGlvs W✓. : ry - - DEMarES oecrA."cZe W.N SK✓ o W. 'A oF✓;/OrES ARC Di?AMCE :? C G`2 •'TE�"•V ' EMEVT :: A'O K M. PN,£. .4 Dd(/oTEs LL�FTC/ L BGne BC 2'LY/ RE- • •.• - H.(r ✓i✓. �-MCP. E cUR.: e/,.6. 6.u.' fR V. !' ,✓.H•!7) Cw O£NOTE-9 OYEQNEAO HR Cf5 0yIv'lP�d:pTfS CQowL: SrV4L 0EC ECTR/C BOX 0 NNW N.H(T) OOX -_ MH•(r)�'Lk..P. ^/'N ovw Y.O. .'. -••• C,P avw CB _ a'w °EG /4JJ.C.-) fE',VOTCS SEWE2 CYfMN-OUT omv Z.e OAr.u,(r _ "'v • ) G v DEUO Es ads P.cLPE' ' - `P•S .• :'. .' Cl. ' - eW.Y. �W. Y.•S S. _ oW.Y •'' DENOTES 5T8fETCK.NTNJUO HIXE ' • i Ler ' - •F.I IC.M. oP�,i6r>5 FtrcO 145U LACE r4 e.rre iv 30 MN. r P (J ` C'O,VC` ' '.'n ' , •� ^.•1xH...�. :;..., ; GRASS f . -.HN A 2E.T ✓//JEWALK' �(y,.%•;.•O. H, '.;" - :.rJ„^, TN/S /S A LA VD SZIR VE Y .VOTE' PAQQ/,UG METERS 1 wdA PbQTO r Cu THE -Or SOUlHEPcY 4/G,VT -• Y DF S.E. 1s rA'. I RFY1SlONS QLUO AND 1fe THE EA STE?LYAND fvFSTEBCY We,ee -CV'•W e AF ed OXe A</A.4/ reeS Orb fB/r9 Rom.rks �' GEGAL DESCR/P7iDU: .�//s/ WE4E NOT LOCATED. T/rf4E AQf uo METERS /c'_•- ON Bf'/Q:E[!. /PFNOE aP OM T/,LrMAQTN Si4!GF 2. 9.9 D-T THE SOUT/! V2 Df LOT, ; A.UD L075 e TH,PU /5, B07;V J,UCLUS7VF- ; A.UD LOr,7 17,7R6I ?S, BOTH UCL1/S/f/E, BLLYX S0.'rTH ;d,t•1EU- S.E. ID.'rF uuury B 1e DED MAPO.F BRJCKELL'S ADDITJO,U TO THE MAP OF M�AI.I/ ; AC(17R0/,c/G TO TNEPLATTHFREOf, RELbRGL''D /.V FYATBOO,1 L!7•rr _1y0 B ✓ w 'm 7'T �•,pT ROLE113,01CTHEPU6LI0RECORDS0PQ4D6-MaA17Y, FLOR104, ,LID LOTS 1G,4 AND /CB, "WiLKa/50A/:4 SUBDMIS/O,U' AL�`OROLUG TO THEPLA7 THERe�.OF AMFCORDED /,UFYT ABOpr!5JA7 PAGE 2/, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF O4LL- (2041V7,V AW g1,0A. SECT1OA139, MI'VAISJIIP 5d 4-0407N, R4,c1ae.4 EAST C/T)' Of MiAM/, FLOR/OA. r------ 10047/0/cl MtJP-` r^ -- SC4L£:J''/00' ,07e,5 : /), BEAR/NGS S/TOW,U HEREON REFS-R 7D AN aSfauyCO �l/.55^,;�'•$p •1V.� ryc THE CE.�'TERL LVE Of SE. /SJ°'ROAD. 2}. TH/S SURYEY A'•CS BEEs/PREAtREG FOR JHE £XCLUS/VE U.;E DF THE E.UT/Ty,vdMEO HEREO,V. JHE CERT/FJC<T/Ou HERCO,c/DOES ,WJT EXTEI/O TO,d/✓y UV1JdMED PbRTy- ,g). P.fEPAREO fOR : Te42EMr.R:c; 1'a c- ,. ,. 4). ALL P/PES SET BY TN/S SURVEy BEAR /DE.✓TIFy/.�/G CAPS /•/' LCi 87. 5). UULE55 CTHERWiSE /DOTED, TH/5 f/RM NAS //OT A7TEMPTEO 7D LOGa7E FOOT/,VGS AL/O� OR foOAID.47jauS C). VIS/BLE IMDICA TORS OF U7" 7/ES 'JRE SHOWN'VeREDV, HOWEVER, NO A7TEAdPT NAS BEEU MADE TO LOC47E UNOERCiROUVD ITEMS. 71TlE PRDPEP-r,t/SHaWAI FF Or -A FA"5 411T91W FF-0C"L FLOCD KAv.RD LotiE }E'��EL.I L,E "��L:i2.C>�Ayp Pwr+a 20NE;X'j PFK•1-I.R.MAP.Ne. 120650 o1Si l''J, ATCU 7-17.95, 6). 7HE O/5T4,UCES SHOWN dCOUG PA LWEBry [ L✓C 5 dB_, QECP20 AND MEASUQEO , UNCfSS OTHdQ/V/SE WOW0. 2) EL EV/T/aVS SNO/yN NE2 EOL' ,QELdrE TO C'//Y OF M//,N/ yf41 LOW Wdree BAY O•(rL'H " /17 J FUONO 'Ip PIPE Wlr* LB - 57 PL4ST/C C-el S ATALL PPOPE2TI CT.I.p,VEQS, EJ-CEP-A5 ,VOTE_ 77VIS SA'f'74V/ ,C EFL ECTS THOSE f.45E./E,VTS, Q/ONlS •oF • N',fy, r[ O OTNEP fIATrE,CS a<-J R'JTTABLE M17dVe Pe-e LAWYC,p5 777'-'C ULSORAMCe. C0RPoP-A7-10N. COLlA,JIT/IE,Ui 000.a1 DArCO OLC.Jd,10ID1 .47'B;eJ A,M, :•: 12,J BE//LXMACL't: EL EVd T/D,V•d. 7S0':/7'Of M/AH/ C/IY Of M/AM: BE,vCHHAQ.e AT 7HE SLY/7HN'fSTCOpN6P OF7NE-wT6RSELTigv cY' 75rr. WO Aua E.C/CV:ELC APENuf. 6ENCWMAQ,Lr2 : E'L SPAT/O,V• /0,.59'C/TY OFH/AN/ C/7Y Of IdMi EfNC/,'HAQ,r. AT THE NO£TNF�IS.'L1�yVE2 eta THE.rA'TF_?SECT/ON Of 5; {Y/s-A{•+swvE AND SE. /dr. TE-eRACf. /e.) THEef AkENO Y/SiB[E EHCEa4ri/HF�//5, OrNE¢ /yA,V TNOSG SM7wN //f2fON /o.) 7L7A4PARCAVL' SPACES -' 100 15.) LIFT A27= J c S (150,273 6o - E FFFr', e..^eoei AR A c5.12.-� AC2e5 �222, 0$G " , CAI.Cv �-A-rC9 To � OF STZFE:S ADO AWLV. Submitted into the public CSR71117/SD To recor iin connection with /- Greenberg Trourlg, PA. item JILT / itl on // / --i' ,v 2. L6wytrS Trfle /nSNranee Corpor.><ion �� Walter Foeman City Clerk I HEREBY CERT/FY %hof dhis SYETCllOFSUPYE y "af the p/vPer}y described hereon 1s fT(ve and (Y7rrH"/ /0 /7'7e h&S/af my k,70w/edge 012d 6e ref oS rece77f/qq svTYeyed ano' d1nW17 Under'M sU�l?rvrslorJ. lfiis Survey comp/yes Wi/h /he Mi/I/mum Tedir7rm/ Sfor/dords odop/ed by }he F/arida StoleBDord Of Pr0fESB1017QI Sucueyars and JI/op�Ls pursvonr to.ChoP:eT.GJG/a,lr, :Fla-id0 4dminis/rotiYs �(�e• Schwebke --51�lski12 (�' ' ssoCiofes, In,^ ay: ROber f.. J00kS1/7 /07o%`esS10n0/ LO/%/ Surveyor V ° 2403 5'tD% 0/• F/OFrdo, .SOUTH OAOC OFNCf - //00'/ SW. /ddrr. S/efEr - /f/Ay/ F(A. 99/RG 'VOrE' SrETC/''/S NO7 wz,,g /l'iTNOUT ' (+N>JP17.rf/o R./ trrs: /lrr,Jdy-,ids ,cus rvsJ •6aNJe T'S'E S/GNA7UQEANO THE de.VIA A( RAIGeD 5E,1C C1�pfbp e7E - £"Dd&AR7e2S - a21O CORPORATE WAY - MIRAM:AR, FL, 3302G OrA'Y0E/el4 L/cEMSED SuQVEY04 duo MAPPER. SCHWEBKE - SHISKIN & ASSOCIATES INC." La-a7 ATxr�/JC+?•erect LAfJD PLANNERS ENGINEERS 7 ARCHITECTS LAND SURYEYORS B7' D - BY: IBdTZ Dab: //•25-.-)2 I Checked Or: RFD. Dot.: ,E'DBE,PJF. JdCL5DN - ,.P ^- uter.d Land Suva or N" 2das Drd•r N..„ 021 Ft: 5KE7CHfS Smle: /•, 3D' R•g' 7 tat. d Flay. ZD30,PG./5 R.ghU.d E.pl- N.-91at..1 Flory. FHe - .41-3003 She.t Na / d / Show U J b • C7 • Submitted into the record in connect on Public on 4Liz-ZI(C�- item p7 'L �rit17 Walter Foeman . City Clerk R-1 "CA 2100 SCALE I" = 300' PORTION OF SECTION J9-54-411POLLY LEWIS DONATION LCfifmr ¢ grow L90AreY E- man aaY we mum mmvr90 mz aAaw ww mw B ammo wmaraer V grow nc moawr ""A mn arrow """Am i grow as a ® man Sow asrra rwaar � arow man � a)DD lea ® arrow %fu m moo aaeaAv s9a Yrrra[ m maTw Ea90l MWaa[ rD grow 1111 9awfaa ® � a®QmcY9rY�lmm QaQ -few mow 91waaR Sw9 aeon mow a1191I91f /OQ �v— amco awaam � ' —�— amw amine ar �- awnrwAaaue w arrow AraO • arrow AIIC LA9ow a maYw gr4 O 0A11[ grow mac woo a mso ArWr SOUTH MI"I AVENUE N 15'11'45� E OWNERS: MPL/N COMPANY, LTD. 1177 VNE CONCOURSE &tY HARBOR, ELORIOA. J3154 BRICKELL .INVESTMENT REALITY CORP. 1850 K STREET, N.W., WAISHINOTON, D.0 70006 >DI � � nnrrmrr� AirAeir -. (153-67) PROPERTY IN ZONED. SO-5 (SP£CNL DISTRICT) � PER CITY OF MIWI ORDINANCE 11000 AS AMENDED. WV MXW W& m AN AZMO R.w,W^ a S srmso r AM7W roKa uc orS- rsn R7 7) Lf" DB'0 mN 9WN 10EW' wtt PVtl = dY a" AGQS !) M6tAT1AS Saw /E%a' arrrrD/S 56571 A0a55(IS40A Sa r7)TAa1451 amx a'11Y D AIC ALLY m ff 4070r) rag 7W V AWIpMM AT M E �m ASD 1..1911 AOH$51997 R FpiM1La3 Ra/KYl Q<A' FASf91C AILEY m if wARD) FaR ma/ 7' MO AMV" M RIDS AREA(70' LT W AUEY m R MW70) - 01499A0VgT0r94 SD. FT.) 4) M ORM ROM OF 26 MW 6 IO WTI' iE A A) 1I` 1W 01FEYYCT AV7m W FW *5 N0T AM)A70 m LOG7r PoWMS A REM Or DE ff AWAY 9An 9Gfi61l Arnlw aw&ma S) aQ(IM Or PWA Lama? 9) Do 9RWY SAS RRVARD fW 7W EA' JWW aQ Or PC rM/716 AMLlD MA:ML W AT/ADO Ci7PaVMV D09 ACT DIM TO AM UWAArD PARRS. S I MC At ff Oa W M a-DrPAL riaao M,C7-n-9s D Ar(& 1 H RERI' COMM That this 'SaMm OF SURVEY of #% prapa! f AE(fL 1z0) AM7 /AC IlFN !ED M )A AV ZOLV 2 W . FV? "XO 4M NCI IX16050 { darrlhed hrwm b true and mrrad to the bad of m f WM Wga and D) M58f HAC1M W URMS ARE 900 MR'X WKWA AO ATSIPT MS Mod ae raowttf amwfW and dmm under mf wpm take and dtr ellm MEEK WX mLL TE UAVUOW AMMS Thla saver aampOe e1% t1m Ylmlmam Tehalmt Sk da9da ",*W 9) DSMW ALGA: DXAGWrW RMU PRMR771Y Ars W= AAa WAAmD ImM al Su a the Flm Stab � d daCoda.' k Chapter 11O17-1, narldm IdmWdmRw 10) W AWY 6 StdC 7 10 EAmnirs AID ears ar MY nMT M D 8T SCFINE9tE-SIdSIGN ! ASSOL7ATES, INC. RFLECO a A .YARN W ELATE W PC S1. Cr LANDS 11) f9EAnM SWO "ON RELATE 70 CITY OF Mue MEIN L01r VJ& MY W7W.. 17) M70464 lY . R) MY OF L /f/!J•r W AT ns SOmur a7w ar iM N2WMN W SE 15N Rawl BN Ra6a1 F. JadmL PrWdvrf �.W L mW � n4 A1a L WJM AN'.ML. SEUImN - a75 CITY Or WAN of an Or L rARC A7 Ir.0 MN CO OF IM //lSRZ'!AN WIN It ARM[ State at FIMda . 46' IRVI - I TY AAO SE um rEaelcE EuviRM9 - 7aso an ar MMY 131 rag COOMNK 9& a VMV W 7WE 9F ATTADS nal LOT.SFZVN 0— i u t�y 6- k1' • • • Submittec' into rec the Public ite ri on connection b , Witt, Walter Foeman City Clerl, wmwozlmm SCALE 1 a = J00' PORTION OF SECTION J9-54-41/POLLY LEWIS DONATION L ,C , am" .®Fa1ar Aar anon uoo Aar E— man our war manaaaerAmarrar am= mop mw 9 man mm men L7 wean Ale Naewr man Carard atom G1.7 11 w ® may m" aM.AQ Omar aaao 0a1/ • � IOa ® aeon NaE m won awu..:Yar mww m map wemw nwar amour PA, IYMar ® aTm eamlofsrArm RAO i aeon amuNr swrr aaian �-►+- man Crew Aa mm —ar— man a1EeO0 Y< ' —�— maze mrar uK t man ra.~ Im � anon man.rrloaar o anao mo v aAre man cum aa' MR MOM ZVENC A�W SOUTH MI"I AVENUE N 15'1145a E —20' ALLEY aJrrAJM FA OWNERS TAPL/N COMPANY, LTD. rw KANE CONCOURSE 84Y H4?DOR, fZOR10A. JJ134 6R/CKCLL INVESTMENT REALITY CORP. 1850 K STREET, N.W., WASNINOTON, D.C. 10008 (153— 67) PROPERTY /N ZONED. SD-5 (SPECLAL DISTRICT) PER CITY OF M/AW ORDINANCE I1000 AS AMENDED. al UMMO AV 10 E Mai= AND AEMW Of A PM 0) AV WqW AWW 07 ➢B ®TAT IS A Y101F A A MM OF K Xr AElYAS SLMr AVOK 1 HEM CEBf"- Thal Ihf. 'SnIM OF SYBYE7' of ffe prgrl, dm@od honon Is true and aornd to 1M feat of M Im 0*v and This w^ol camp Mel tIn Ylnimurn Toehldmad � l Stoepirwh9mas apl bF the Flarfda State Bond of Surwrys and Yappers lxmwd to CepM 610/7-4 FlMda AdmWdmtn Cade. SCHYM-SIOSI01f A ASSOWTES, Wt Babel F. A bur Prddad Prafed—A Lad Saw 02400 ANSlate at nwfdoCUMUN. �a,8511f�8bFJ w r) DEA NGS SWO N0d7.W MY& fat An AZ A M 9:W'6' OF S SPa050' E /laic rw Aoma /f IM or SE. ISM Rw 7) IEGC D=W7ON SOON AEFECW US PPOMW 9/ aeg J) Rou" AS ww hmov awwc aswMVUNR)MX7ff ANWV Q rY BMW Or O /r C00) fal W AW 11511 ACSA77 a FMUG a70SE Wan) FR7RC7 A; E: ARFA(XP 9W W AUfr M ff VArA70) - 0145" SUM" SA fT) A) MM ODOMW A07M B& FRY MS MOT AM WFD W fXAM MOINS AW/ON FOIAWAIEWS 5) ammm or Rw mp.. a) 7W SIAMY WAS AUAMD RN OE (ATYUM USE OF OE 04710 MWD rR OX D[ ATIALYED EiWOW N 0= AOT a7DO R) ANY LWAC7 PARES: 7) ARaUM SWOT/ hCO N TAUS MIAM FFlER1( R0a0 /q7A® lM[ AE /M.-1I.0). AE'(EL IEO) AW ROOD ZME r.. PER FA7C AW Na [M&W OW 4 WED 07-17-9 5 E) KSKE MORNS SE OWRES ARE900 H MAY 10KHX NO AREIWT MO aCF/A YCE TO IOWE CMERCMM //EYS S) X AAEES AfaW W"Wr Of 9.fiM FRW&rf ARE RMW AAO "WO UPI= OOER.W STATM.. 10) TW 9EALr 6 9W.ECT 70 FASLA7OS AAW ff0OS OF NAY Wrl W" Br RWIEC70 aN A SfW04 OF MEE OF HE RRECT UAWS 11) BjWMAn 9qM t"ON REUTE To CYR' a AW IEAY tor %40 BAY DARK. 12) x0fi n AAJ 07Y OF IOW SDO"V AT PC ZW*37 000 dF 0E AIBMr" LIT SE 150 RW AAO 800M ANAE. DIWMN - E75 WY OF AW a) COY OF IOW N1eJA W AT DE NWACAS7 C'anLP 6 7W MDWMN CY SW. 10 A"E AAO SE 140 MUM of A W - M50 07Y OF AW 1J) RN EEMER'A7EK SQE A MW CF TAM SF ARAW IMF LOT. -IUD • • • • 0 ARCHITECTS BERMELLO - AJAMIL & PARTNERS 2601 S. Bayshore Drive, 1 Oth floor Miami, FI 33133 tel. 305.859.2050 T.O.S. EL. +406'-0' —'as of ® w 171'W r, !i a 1.70 w r ® w rre :11r T W1 9i -1p II w r 19 W. n a1 a n^'In'�i m Ef ref, r.-n F� ec rri'I.r.r. tii t 7i>k w- r &1 Ef 1P 1S)k U'_ 49 . ..� )irT m a rel lr r ir w T 7r�a- r. 80'-6" t! as of 7.12.00 56'-611 L. s of 6.14. T.O.S. EL.-406-0' *A os of 7.12.00 1'&7 i 11: W 1��1 li"pl•n_u..-_ ..... .�iudliill: (■�trf�� ■ e w • � • • • Nye I. u.. ..-.. ._._�. _ ..■■h ulll U_Ur� ■ • ■ Nmu .aeaewL r 'J. a" AL, . r I o l it 1 Brickell Avenue Elevation (East Elevation) T.O.S. EL. +350-0" Q' as of 7.12.00.00 Q 4 't it r a, zr it rt� 7 i II , ll � II. r a� a, PARK PLACE ,A T B R I C K E L L M - U . S - P - City of Miami Major Use Special Permit Application June 01, 2000 (REVISED) a Submitted i reco in co to the Public I tem nnection with on .. Walter Foe man City Clerk DEVELOPERS PARK PLACE, LLC 848 Brickell Avenue, Suite 1010A �. Miami, FL 33131 305-371-5254 • • • Submitted into recor item nn /� ccoon • ' ! PROJECT NAME PARK ❑ PLACE D O — _- at 0 491 B� ❑❑ BRICKELL ®M M.U.S.P. Application E9Set DEVELOPERS PROPOSED PARK PLACE AT BRICKELL PROJECT PARK RACE.LLC ■ WaIfidnyd1010 Tt M'wni, FL33131 33131 Legend k 3"1426/ Q_�� ■ Recently Completed ❑ Under Construction j Planned ARCHITECT Existing Metro Rail Metro Mover Miami River ❑ Metro Mover Station \/ 2. MchBWure- Enprrwming - MorWng -, Inlvior DMign . land.capn Design �--❑ ❑ Mixed -Use Projects 2601SI ph"Driw A. Miami One -Residential /Retail /Hotel Office �•0.dS9�-4(K�Ohx30S859.9633 `1 n G ' j ❑ B. River Renaissance - Residential / Retail J myP" Q ❑ C. Constructs - Hotel / Retail oti CD a D. Mixed Use Project ir .___ i �� 1r: ❑ E. 4 Season's Tower - Residential / Retail / Hotel / Office °oo <1 C1 °='. / 0 ❑ F. Espirito Santo Tower - Residential / Office N —❑ o o I mr e ❑ G. JW Marriott / Barclays Financial Center - Hotel / Office J /� I�'isiors 0 0 Residential / Hotel Projects i Q Biscayne Bay ■ 1. Brickell on the River ❑ 9. Mandarin Hotel O ❑ 2. Miami Circle Site ■ 10. Yacht Club I 13 (3 �Q C ° Q ' Q7 Co a ■ 3. Future Residential Tower ❑ 11. Yacht Club II 3su S. oq o ' ■ 4. Courvoisier Courts ❑ 12. Brickell Bay Plaza o ;o 00 05. One Tequesta Point ❑ 13. Bayshore Palms 0 ad � `► 6. Two Tequesta Point ■ 14. Fortune House hood No. 20M.W0 • �J / ij - Ddr. lures 30, 2000 Dm , lA Q ■ 7. Three Tequesta Point ❑ 15. Brickell Grand S•s•�Ws• "0Nonw: Fi:wch\"9cw\ ° ® 8. Future Residential Tower ❑ 16. Brickell Commons DrwfAnor4 200°°%WZ Q public BRICKELL CONTEXT with AREA PLAN —^ L / Drowirp SF,W No. 'emsn A- 0.0 Clerk 6 i -" 10 3 6 • • • PROJECT CRITERIA - ZONING / SETBACKS / OVERVIEW • SITE REQUIRED / ALLOWED PROVIDED ZONING DISTRICT SPECIAL DISTRICT - 5 5 NETLOTAREA 157,177 s.. 157,177 s.. GROSS LOT AREA 220AM s.. 220,664 L. OPEN SPACE 15% G.LA= 30,099.E s.. 107,277 s. . BUILDING FOOTPRI 117,174 a . PROVIDED REQUIRED/ OWED MR FAR . DENIIAL 3.25 x G.L.K 717,158.00 s. . BASE FAR. - IFM 4.25 x G. 937,822.00 s. . BASE FAR - ED 4.25 x G.LA 937,822.00 s. . 20%P.U.D. 20% of FAR 187 .40 s.. MAX FAR 1,125 s . 1,050,482 s.. • F.A.R. BREAKDOWN PHASE 1 PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PROJECT TOTAL FAR. 297,189 s . 364,311 s.. 388,982 s . 1,050,482 s. . NON- FAR 60AN s . 89,473 s.. 77,149 s . 227,110 s. . PARKING 264,006 LT 287,707 s.. 243,832 s . 735,545 s. . TOTAL 561,683-sf. 741,491 s.. 709,963 a . 2,013,137 s. . • BUILDING FRONTAGE PROVIDED BRICKED. AVENUE 327'-11' SOUTH MIAMI AVENUE 445'.11' S.E.1 ROAD 224'•11- • BUIDUNG HEIGHTS REQUIRED/ALLOWED PROVIDED PARKING 137'-1' (35% Mac Tower) 109-6' RESIDENTIAL - TOWER 1 No Height Redridions 376-4' RESIDENTIAL - TOWER 2 No Rectricliors 420'-8' RESIDENTIAL - TOWER 3 No Height Restrictions -10' • SETBACKS REQUIRED/ALLOWED PROVIDED VARIANCE 94MLLAVENUE (FRONT) v4 30-0' None SOUTH MIAMI AVENUE (SIDE) 164r 15'-0' None S.E. 15th ROAD (SIDE) 1 15A' 15-0' None INTERIOR YARD (NORTH) 19-0' + Abm 40-V whack P-0' pr 6'0 in h4M to a mar of 40' 3' 2' (Variance #1 6 #2) INTERIOR YARD (WEST) 15' 0' + Abaw Ice a whack 1'-0 pr 6'-0 n higM>o a mac of a 6'-b' 2 ` (Variance #3 "" INTERIOR YARD (SOUTH) 15'-0' + Abwe 40'-0' whak 1'-0' pr 6' ' in h*# a o mar of 40 154r None • bgaiwd wrbadc a bah Ground i L pw liwl • PROJECT PROGRAM PHASE 1 PHASE 3 PROJECT TOTAL RETAIL 4,232 s.. 7,418 s . 22,823 s. . RESIDENTIAL 292,957 s . M353,138 381564s . 1,027 659 s.. RECREATION DECK 16,810 s . 23AM s . 72,607 s. . PARKING 204,006 a .. 243,832 L 735,545 s. . B.O.H. 11,234 s .. 13,127 s . 37,590 s. . VERTICAL CIRCULATION 32,444 s.. 42,023 s.. 39,323 s.. 113,790 s. . COVER WALKWAY 1,858 ST 1,265 s.. 3,123 s.. TOTAL 561,683 s.f. 741,491 s.. 709,963 sf. 2,013,137 S.f. • UNIT BREAKDOWN PHASE 1 PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PROJECT TOTAL STUDK) 24 32 11 1 BEDROOM 80 141 110 331 1 BEDROOM w/ DEN 24 - 32 2 BEDROOM • type 'A- 33 67 65 1 2 BEDROOM - -B' 71 32 167 2 M w/ DEN 24 28 31 83 TOTAL 256 328 334 918 • PARKING BREAKDOWN Min Required for SCodD-5 Cry of Miami PHASE 1 PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PROJECT TOTALS STUDIO 1 per i 24 units 24 spaces unite s 32 units 32 s 11 units 11 BEDROOM 1 per i 104 units 104 141 units 141 spaces 142 units 142 s 387 units 387 spoors 2 BEDROOM 1 per 1 128 units 128 127 unite 127 s ass 160 unite 160 s 415 units 415 spoca RETAIL 1 s 1,000 t.. 4,232 s . 4 1,113 s . 11 on 7AI S s . 7 s 22,823 s.. 23 TOTAL REQUIRED 260 spoon 1 339 spooss 341 spaces TOTAL PROMD 438spam, 514 spaces 422 spoces 1 1,374 spaces • LOADING REQUIREMENTS REQUIRED/ALLOWED PROVIDED PHASE 1 ® 85,447 s . 4 BerthsQ 12'-9 x 35'-0' 250,000 6 500,000 s.. 2 Berths Q 12'-0' x 3V4r dr' 2 ®104r x 29 PHASE 2 @ 442,778 s.. 4Bwh @ 12'•9 x 35.0' 250,000 6 500,000 s.. 2 Be Q 12'-0' x 35-0' 3.2 a 19-0' x 20 PHASE 3 @ 442,971 s.. 4 ®12.0' x 35' 0' 250,000 6 500,000 s.. 2 Berths ®1 TA' x 35P4' R' 2 Berths ®19-0' x 29 ' Class II permit slows rs&mc ion in berth sae from 12' 4r x 35 4Y to I0.0' x 29- 0' n PROJECT CRITERIA A-0.0 BRICKELL CONTEXT AREA PLAN A-0.1 PROJECT CRITERIA & DRAWING LIST PROJECT SURVEY TENATIVE PLAT SURVEY A-0.2 ZONING SITE PLAN A-0.3 PROPOSED SITE PLAN L- 0.0 GROUND FLOOR PLANTING PLAN - ALL PHASES L- 0.1 TYP. PARKING PLANTING PLAN - ALL PHASES L- 0.2 9th FLOOR PLANTING PLAN - ALL PHASES A-2.0 GROUND FLOOR PLAN - ALL PHASES A-2.1 2nd FLOOR PLAN - ALL PHASES A-2.2 3rd - 4th FLOOR PLANS - ALL PHASES A-2.3 5th - 7th FLOOR PLANS - ALL PHASES A-2.4 8th FLOOR PLAN - ALL PHASES A-2.5 9th FLOOR RECREATION DECK PLAN - ALL PHASES A-2.6 TOWER FLOOR PLANS - ALL PHASES A-2.6a TOWER FLOOR PLANS - ALL PHASES A-2.7 PHASE 1 - SITE PLAN A-3.0 SITE SECTION A-3.1 WALL SECTIONS A-3.2 WALL SECTIONS A-3.3 WALL SECTIONS A-3.4 WALL SECTIONS A-4.0 WEST ELEVATION (S. Miami Avenue Elevation) A-4.1 SOUTH ELEVATION (S.E. 15th Road Elevation) A-4.2 EAST ELEVATION (Brickell Avenue Elevation) FAR-0.0 GROUND FLOOR PLAN - ALL PHASES FAR-0.1 2nd FLOOR PLAN - ALL PHASES FAR-0.2 3rd - 4th FLOOR PLAN - ALL PHASES FAR-0.3 5th - 7th FLOOR PLAN - ALL PHASES FAR-0.4 8th FLOOR PLAN - ALL PHASES FAR-0.5 9th FLOOR RECREATION DECK PLAN - ALL PHASES FAR-0.6 TOWER UNIT PLANS - ALL PHASES U C LY E g U cu ® LL .0 v .� L U a C O C p U C L E ll� E PROJECT NAME PARK PLACE at BRICKELL M.U.S.P. Application Set DEVELOPERS PARK MACE, uC 54 !riche AMO SJb 1010 A6ani, R 33131 w. 30.r371-5254 ARCHITECT 0 Arc ileclum - Engfnwwfng -Planning kyWw Drign - Lw K6wps Design 2601 S. kph= Drip Sub 1DDo Miuri, R 33133 M.M5459.2050 fu3VAW-%35 14a.:•:I mit "Mal M�n SEAL 0 wurA moo, u rL AIOe@R RC. NO. N 0aw= Projea No. 20006.0D0 Scale: Dow: Jww 30, 2000 Drown: JA Chrked: S.B. / W.B. File Nwrw: H:\A h\Projecw\ 20006WZ Drawing ride PROJECT CRITERIA & DRAWING LIST D" wing %*0 No DRAWING LIST A-0.1 Oyu► 3b • • `-' 3 aCV C m CD a)U a? � c o C:3 c \ .0->m • / Q / h l ki / / / / , / / / / / / , / ------------- ---------- Property Line (Net Lot Area R=25.09 / A=30.85' / D=70a42' 35' / / Property Zoned "SD-5" Net Lot Area 157,177 Gross Lot Area 220,664 SOUTH MIAMI AVENUE REAR YARD - - - - - - - - - - - - - 40'-0"L-- - ------1 lei -- 0"Setback Line ■ � I O I I I I I I I �? INTERIOR YARD (WEq (X� ad , I I I p I ` r- � I !j I 11S I I I i I oj00 ---4- Above 40'-0" setback 1'-011 per 6'-0" in height I Cto a max. of 40'-0" Gross Lot Area - - —cc— - - -- S:0„ F- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - 40-------� I 7r----------------- -------------------- --------------------- / I I I PROJECT NAME PARK PLACE at BRICKELL M.U.S.P. Application Set PARK RACE, LLC 84 bi&d hw= $A 1 DI Mim* F1, 33131 ARCHITECT I Mchi v&h - Enpir ring -Planning Inbrior D-ign - Land.cap. D..ign 2601 S. N"hm Drib $A 1DDo Wwr4 FL33133 14 30"ff.2050 kx 3V4"-9638 KEY PLAN r GN 0 ANCFWIWT WILD. A eVAKW, MA tiEMMM,M0007M Pro N. 20005.000 Scale: V - 20'A' Dab: Jar» 30, 2000 Drawn: JA ChockW: S.& / W.L. File ND": H:W Vrojed.\ 2000EWY\ Drawing r*6 ZONING SITE PLAN Drawing &S*O No. A-0.2 � 0 U t C .t] S E U CL o o w v LL U o` = c oco U S (D c tz E a 1 • — — v PHASE 3 , iE 2_) w MUT i / l 1� SOUTH MIAMI AVENLW —1---T—T r w�mr_n�r•InNil BRICKELL AVENUE I — I I -- I_-- ----------------- -� I I W :DH ■ Phase 1� Tower 1 - 33 Story, 256 Unit Residential Tower @ 24 Floors 7 Story Parking Garage @ 438 Spaces Ground Level Retail @ 4,232 s.f. ■ Phase 2 Tower 2 - 39 Story, 328 Unit Residential Tower @ 30 Floors 7 Story Parking Garage @ 514 Spaces Ground Level Retail @ 11,173 s.f. Phase 3 Tower 3 - 41 Story, 334 Unit Residential Tower @ 32 Floors 7 Story Parking Garage @ 422 Spaces Ground Level Retail @ 7,418 s.f. Total Units = 918 units Total Retail = 22,823 s.f. F--------------------------------------- I ----------------------------------------- I I I I I I Total Parking = 1,374 spaces PROJECT NAME PARK PLACE at BRICKELL M.U.S.P. Application Set DEVELOPERS PARK nice, LLe tMmmk w.3ui1010 ADmi, FL 33131 t13"14m ARCHITECT /Wdledun- t�...tnp.Pbmtrq 2601 S. kWm Drive s.r 1000 Wmi, FL33133 it X5 tlP.1010 im.3*W.fiat KEY KM 0 RNOfrlCTl0.lW N W07700 prow No. 20000.00D Scale: 1• - 20'•0' Ddr. J" 3D, 2DDD Dmw JA ar.dm& &L/W.a File Norm m-.WCh\► 01Kft\ 2000tWL\ Dmwing Tile SITE PLAN ALL PHASES Drowblp Shout Na A-0.3 60-036 • F 0 z i S? U CL LL ti U c o o c3 4 C E a / / / / i n DI\I V 1\LLL P%V LI `I V L • ivu im - - - an 0 C^I 1T1.I kAIA►II A\/L\Il IC k— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — - 1 it 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 LEGEND Retail Residential Back of House Parking Vertical Circulation PROJECT NAME PARK PLACE at BRICKELL M.U.S.P. Application Set DEVELOPERS PMK MACE, LLC Us �InV htvI Suir 1D10 M6* FL 33131 %Lxmn.m ARCHITECT I Jadlilrrtlln - &4nowiv - Mannino InWor Doioa - LaD-ion 2601 s b*m Ork sraP low gut FL33133 11L 30549.2060 lac 3DSW-96X KEY PLAN G~ MVMK" MAL 0 WurA srco, IA !L ASCHrrWr IM NO.,AI OIW700 IMod No. 2000E.000 scow. V _ 2(Y-V Dar: Jury 30.2000 Drawn: JA. Chm*W: &L / WA FlM Nam.. H:Wch\h*cb\ 2000f1\ad2\ Drvwino Ti61 GROUND FLOOR PLAN - ALL PHASES Drawing Shag No. A-2.0 00-i036 PROJECT NAME • 3 c cu U CL N .2 L w U c0n� 'i J E U E L w • e 9 SOUTH MIAMI AV" 21 6 7 10 12 14 16 18 19 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 — — — — — — - � — — PHASE 2 PHASE, 1 4 ,•" PHASE 3 P 24 / / / ■ I: a w a � Eli ' t: ' •1%1 �, O »f ] s 7s IIi , 1 , it 1 / Q lIFQ bi,sasars•gk ' , a ' ' ' irROlf+�s.0 ' 'mm=Q u•nM O 1t E uIu » ■ » i n a s b a x s a► J Q 4/ a I s• I a w.w sy I sww I ,sswr saws '�� � r�r h Be W o a � �/ / O I ✓ 1.40 41 42 w M 1 rl lsi N t1MLM N ;�ar rla r r r o�ra r�- nose2 1 31 PACK to 31 ro n n n 74 n Y. n - n 0 a - � � l • / ( \ '-� - � , - -ram— - --I ED - 2 �.� -• .T rea®aty[ � L -- ry BRICKELL AVENUE aver //n/i.�;is � /iin�! N!' i�%y3/W /• a%iq �%!„%i%� iiJi3'r/��//�/%�iiir .iiii d i Siy r� ar�:Jor � �:.•✓iti-icy' x-i __!� J�.saai�`Trgt,. D r rr I 4 1ra STANCAM MAONC RACE KWDICOM sru= n PARKING SPACE PLANS SCALE: 1 /8' = 1'-0' (- D- --------------------------------------- L_ 1 — — — — — — — — — — — ----------------- r — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — -- — — — — — — — I I I I I F-1 LEGEND Retail Residential Back of House -- Parking Vertical Circulation PARK P LAC E at BRICKELL M.U.S.P. Application Set DEVELOPERS PAU PLACE, LLC tM kir#s1 Avenw Su1r 1010 M mi, FL 33131 Ii. 305371525/ ARCHITECT (0 Andthidur• - Engineering - Planning Interior Deign - Londvi Deign 2601 S. kyim Drive sub1000 Ii FL33133 ML U41P.2000 faL 3OW-96A KEY PLAN Gm LtlVI90N5 SEAL 0 wur w NWARWI sA Nalsd No. 200001.000 Sw{r. 1' - 2V.V Doti. Jw» 30, 2000 ro Dwn: JA. Chocked: 3.1. / WA. Fib Nonr: H:Wch\Proji 20008W2\ Dawing TWO 2nd FLOOR PLAN ALL PHASES Drawing Show No. PROJECT NAME • ,-0 A: - Q s o ' z , o `o .- Fa ''^^J Cj vJ • k II SOUTH MIAMI AVW1E1 LEGEND Retail Residential 0 Back of House 0 Parking Vertical Circulation n AI - TM- - _ 3fe1 1 - - �-- - '(— O SOCIAL � i IOAN � tom, tt _,-- — - — - --- _ — _ — -- -- — - _ --� P �. a— -- ------------- --- -- -- ------- PARKING SPACE PLANS BRICKELL AVENUE 2 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0'--------------------------------------- ----------------- I� I I n Fi s�-aka Ei �I�II sly ©AMR /iu♦ ur rii��ii/r/r• /ii /rou, r z�i4 %7.v yirc/ /r IT: { •-- HHIIYH///r /% -----J/-- -- :Y/A•N%J/I l/U/lf/,uZI/J/K1A' %/I/ /%/Nj O II ----------------- I I I I I PARK PLACE at BRICKELL M.U.S.P. Application Set DEVELOPERS rAK nACE, u.c ew 6;drw. w k* 1o10 % 3053n4M ARCHITECT r�y111�1110 hAwpr DNtpn - LondaOP. Dyipn W & N*m Dnw in M1=4 FL33133 M.305-M- 000 J.,=l .%X nAN N REINKMS sm 0 wuY&A1CM u m- AC.rom 11110. NO, AN OO W fOD how No. 2000E.000 SCOW. 1' - 20A' Ddo: Jum 30, 2000 Drown: JA Re Nam: N:WchVrojW.\ 20006\WA omwbv She 3rd - 4th FLOOR PLAN - ALL PHASES D'mi g Shwf No. I* KI c EU c W oc03 c c � c 0 '— U � C Co.) E • PROJECT NAME PARK P LAC E at BRICKELL M.U.S.P. Application Set DEVELOPERS PAW FLAM LLc IM 1lridulAm" Sue 1010 Msd, It 33131 LL 3DS,i71-WM ARCHITECT (0 An�i.dura - .q.rlrq - Planning htl.rior D.:p�-io�dK�a owgr 2601 S. k ihm Wn Sue low Mmk FL31133 MY PLAN G N VISIONS MAL 0 wur� rw,.ua, u ti MO71.Cf Aq. H0.: M W07300 holed No. 200011.000 Scd.: 1' - 20P-0' Ddr. J" 30, 2000 Drawn: JA. ChKw: s.e.iw.a File Namr. H:Wch\hoiK*\ 20009%WA Drawirp rile 5th - 7th FLOOR PLAN - ALL PHASES DiowiroShw No. A-2.3 60-1 U" 36 le le �O ca a C LL 1 o c�" w.Ccat c003 U w •C � L U v lu PROJECT NAME PARK PLACE at BRICKELL M.U.S.P. Application Set DEVELOPERS PARK MACE, LLC w kiddAww smb 1010 Mw4 K 33131 %L 3*W14M ARCHITECT Inwr�aD�ipn . laidraq,. S& 1000 1A1.d R33133 W.306 P.M 6L XS2S ^X KEY nm �N REV610NS sm 0 wur��.0 R /C.1lCf MCL NW M W W700 hojW No. 20009.000 3ai: V - 20-0' DoW.. Am X 2000 Drown JA Ch.dad: &L / WX MW Nanw 1t\4di\hoj"\ 2000!\d2\ mvwwq no* 8th FLOOR PLAN ALL PHASES A-2.4 60-1036 I• 1 40 E U C 0.0 o 0 LL Z ,coo3 U y= � 0 OJECT NAME ARK ' LAC E it ►RICKELL .U.S.P. Application it VELOPERS Mac PLACE, LLC so iiddAmm sub 1010 Mwi,R33131 11L ff.-3 I-M ARCHITECT tida.�. - �.whw - rlon�dp lniwior Dwipn - Dwipn 3i01 S*ohm Dda 9iw 1000 Wm* FL33133 W 306a3I.3030 fac306.1W4W KEY PLAN �N ItevlyONs J. 0 wurw awv," IL wWIRT 1. NOS A1000= ld NO. 20000.000 k 1•-20'O Y. Am 30, 2000 w11: JA c:.d: &I.iw.L Name: H.vAzh\ft*to\ 2000r%W2\ wino Title -h FLOOR PLAN :CREATION DECK LL PHASES wino 3hwi No. \-2.5 G0-1036 PROJECT NAME �y 10 • PHASE 1 TOWER 1 Oth FLOOR PLAN U SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" I I I I I 1 I I I I I a lf2' - A I I n • B lY![T TART 'XZ I - C II Two YA' TYIE'A' rj = E a LEGEND Retail Residential Back of House Parking Vertical Circulation GN L PHASE 11 I I I I I I I I I I I I ,ter - - - - - - A 71 7777,7 77:7 7777 II > "lum II EM SI II I — — — — 4- — PHASE 1 TOWER n 19TH - 33rd FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" TY/®T I I T1lT I d I - - D 2^ iYIE""1v - -- -� E - - - -t�- F LEGEND Retail Residential Back of House Parking Vertical Circulation (19 N I I I I I I I I I PHASE 1 TOWER 11 th - 18th FLOOR P SCALE: 1/16" = V-0" LEGEND Retail o Residential i Back of House Parking Vertical Circulation N PARK PLACE at BRICKELL M.U.S.P. Application Set DEVELOPERS PMK1 WCE, LLC 31131ki11 hmm s"i loto Mimi,FL 33131 ARCHITECT lnwrgr G.'pn tV 2f01 i 3agdwe lkie kb taco M mmw FL33133 1i 3053S!•2o30 im 3 &W-90 KEY PLAN REM" SEAL 0 WLLY A VRAM, EA 2L AIIO"IELT M(L MD, Al Dm7200 holed No. 20008.000 sorb: 1/16. = t'-0' Dal.: Jale 30, 2000 Dm Im JA Chocked: S.B./W.L File Name: H:\Alch\h*jK%\ 20008bd2\ Dmd/p r"le TOWER FLOOR PLANS ALL PHASES Dm„rp slew Na • • Submitte recor it item —1 i 8 9 20� X w V U T S R i 10 12 14 16 18 19 n o xrr a Is a xra z+o 71.71' 1N.? 2fO Xa Mr n•P ra Zr-7i' PHASE 3 PHAiE 2� 1 PHASE 2 I I I I �� � � I tit'•P I I � 11 1• 77 �® 4 t I 1 du § \ 15 1 ��. LEGEND LEGEND Retail Retail =1 Residential Residential PHASE 2 TOWER Back of House Parking PHASE 3 TOWER (ROTATED CLOCKWISE) Back of House Parking 1 Oth - 39th FLOOR PLAN = Vertical Circulation �N 1 Oth - 41 th FLOOR PLAN == Vertical Circulation U SCALE: 1 /16" = 1 r-0" 4 SCALE: 1 /16- = 1 r-0" N into the public connection with on //-M-ee Walter F(-,-, n, - j) (1it" (-Ipf PROJECT NAME PARK P LAC E at BRICKELL M.U.S.P. Application Set DEVELOPERS ►AM i'iACE, LLC SJA tidal Aver" soil. lino Miami, FL 33131 %Lx53n,w ARCHITECT (0 Interior DesignPlanning . Design 2601 s, kidtae Drive So1e1000 Aiod. FL33133 etL 305-0-2050 6L 30S 0 -%X KEY RAN MMSloNS SEAL 0 wuYA toe eto, eA tiN CHrMCrM.r+0sN10ao73ao holed No. 20006.000 scale: 1/16' - 1'-0' Dart Jorw 30, 2000 Drown JA. Chocked: SA. / WA File Name: N:y4ch\hojecA\ 2000VW2\ Drawing Title TOWER FLOOR PLANS ALL PHASES DraW g shoo No. A-2.6a f j ; a-) o k, 7 v .L V 2A v r� • Submitted i reco ;n a item r�� I 1 1 I I I I I 1 I 1 the put section w I -/LlG�- 1Iter Foem, n NORTH - SOUTH SECTION THRU PHASE 2 & 3 L $GALE: 1" = 201_OII PROJECT NAME PARK PLACE at BRICKELL M.U.S.P. Application Set DEVELOPERS PARK PLACE, LLC U8&k 1A,=Salo1010 Afhm, FL 33131 k1.3033 l-wu ARCHITECT (M Arditdum - Eng'memirt8 •Planning fnWior Design - landscepo Doagn 2601 S.B2jdMDdn SA 10DD Ifim-A, FL33133 bl, M- -2050 fac 3050.9630 KEY KAN REVISIONS 0 WLLY A DUAMW, LA. rLAU29W MMDO IR00072W PmjoC No. 20000.DDO Scab: 1' = 2014r Dmo: June 30, 2000 Drawm JA aKdwd: S.B. f W.B. Poe Name: H:Wch\Projaq\ 2000ft z\ Drawing Tdb SITE SECTION Drowirg UK* NM A- O , 1 a 036 PROJECT NAME .7 • I G rer 37 36 I 35 I I 34 I ' 33ZI I 32 I 31 ' 30ZI I I 29 I , 28 ZI 27 I 26 25ZI I I 24 zi 23 _ W W 22 c 21 I I 20 19 ' 18ZI I 17 I , 16 I I 15 14 I ' 13 ZI 12 I I 11 I I 10 ZI _ 9 TOWER 2 I 1 11 fi LOW 1 ---- VE - - - - - - - - - - - - ------ - - � T- PHASE 2 DROP-OFF S. MIAMI AVE. WALL SECTION - PHASE 2 SCALE: 1 e = 20'-0e WALL SECTION - PHASE 1 2 SCALE: 1 e = 20'-0e PARK P LAC E at BRICKELL M.U.S.P. Application Set DEVELOPERS PARK RACE, LLC U8 Bridal A,ww Suits 1010 Wbno FL 33131 teL 306.371315! ARCHITECT Ardrirodure - E� - Plemtirg Interior DmiBn - D=gn 2601 S Mom D&I side Iwo Nw� FL33133 hL 30S-069.2060 I= 305.0-%30 KEY PLAN REVISIONS sm 0 WSLY&IONa AA. 1L AtCHMr I W.1 W.:11 Oe W = Propd No. 20008.000 5006: P — Mr Dmx Juno 30, 2000 Drown: JA Chackw: S.B. / W.B. Submitted F&No : c \ recor into the Pub! c�mwrng Tbie item In connection wi �h on lJ--/G WALL � falter FOema SECTIONS f" orawlnB sheet No. City Cle � ; d� AU-36 PROJECT NAME • 0 r+ E CL �U .21 C 0 VJ � � I E U E co eLQ-, WALL SECTION - PHASE 3 SCALE: 1" = 29-0- TT f Phase 3 Tower 2 t TTT t�f T 37 I zi I I I Phase 2 I Tower I I = I I I I I I I IUN1TS � UNITS 36 35 34 33 32 31 30 29 28 27 26 mmmmwl 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 lb 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 PARKING UNITS i uNIMS I UNITS UNITS I UNITS I =FIRE LOADING F I DOCK vi �. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — �LL SECTION - PHASE 2 SCALE 2 LE: 1- = 20'-0a I 1 1 I 1 I `1 1 1 I 1 I 1 rARK PLACE at BRICKELL M.U.S.P. Application Set DEVELOPERS PARK PLACE. LLC milru limmSu'A1010 Wm* R 33131 bL 3"1.5251 ARCHITECT (D Ard ibdm - Eng - Planning Ialofiorr Da:ign -1 On.. 2601 S. B* mo DrW Sala 10LI0 NianL R33133 fi 3 &M-2050 iac 3MM-MB KEY PLAN r REVISK)W SEAL 1 I L I W FL AACHff= M NO.: AR 00W= 1 I Pmjad No. 20000.000 Scab: P - 20'-0' Dab: Jam 30, 2000 L Dmon: JA Chedmd: &s./w.B. Lib Nm 0 H:Wch\Pmjads\ �d cr art 2000OW2\ ' Drawing Tift WALL 37'-6- BRICKELLAVENUE SECTIONS sang ® 4'48 g:.Q° >Owing Mad No. mrs @ 6- A- 3.2 00-1036 PROJECT NAME • l� u Submitted into reCO ,n connection pub item; y ecfion W1 on Walter Foema CitV Der 9 n WALL SECTION - PHASE 1 SCALE: 1 e = 20'-0e mmma 1 Tower WX NOTE: REQUIRES SETBACK & UPPER LEVEL VARIANCE (VARIANCE #1 & #2) ALLJ:YWAY NOTE: REQUIRES SETBACK & n WALL SECTION - PHASE 1 UPPER LEVEL VARIANCE SCALE: V = 20'-0e im (VARIANCE #3 & #4) PARK PLACE, LLC 81816M Maw Subb 1010 FAK K 33131 ARCHITECT • E��� - Pbmrurg lrnorlor Desgn - Lmndowpo �Bn M L Bafdcm Din $A 1000 Mkmi FL33133 M.305-M-20 fmL 3D$W.%38 KEY PLAN REVISIONS SEAL 0 WLLYA. OEM=N ft. ACCHU=CM NO.. Al OOOMQ Prolw No. 2000&000 scab: 1' - W-M Dale: Juan 30, 2000 Drawn: JA Chedrad: S.S./W.B. Fie No. K%Arch\Proj \ 20008\ed2\ Dm why Trio WALL SECTIONS DrowbM Shve1 No. A-3.4 E t 4 s}s —�0 *WSW" men Rliiisam= iiiiinsmommungs POMMANNUMS!m was ■a ; .... ..... 1W.—M Pwvm::rj2mwn!Ov am, Pas■ s 0 mnmmmmm!mm .... Nl� ..j - ...... PENN powasms",wo ago Name m an !Nnwammammxmnu monsommom ------------------- P!1111:1161111111 man gamm!mn ...... ...... � wnm nommoomme mammon=" !wn !! 111 i rwM I=- 1! "N!m --------- -- lim 'Man' Branca s in. smog's [mamma's 10111"RES loomom ■ loommom ■ Sommman IaNir demand No linessomfmmmuw-sm jusullmi'MEM10 if moo" bm"Mel V' 11115 an Mw 10M ow ad an Al No on 110M win 144 UNMOOR pvllnvw.w..-- I L`��.�.,, rr■nrt hill JL JL Mines Ilk, �11 all a 11�11 I - R - 11 -A F1.1111. - ANION251 ZON: I !:or* N;;Pl "Nita" Mr—TMI", Win low WIN-" ld,bm!.m II&I Ill!- i f t rir� ru;■:r®:: stss all _ — if/■■..� UM li■eilor .rts1r {— .mLu� 00 l��.. t t 1 " / ■ra;a aye �!' e = = = rife.■...— ■/ =11/ter ■sr,�!. W. �.■ ` us :Esc / = = ����. e■ ■etrit is i t I ���sf� iinl.r a/':- .,� f!s_• / — � � lffe...�_ • ■f = �f/ier ut I i i ! ,t,i rill s .■/•. a : = = = fff■■..�— /■ _ anion w■. !> slrraa■ Bosom ats.�al. r■M i.s+!! ■in;mfat rsv r/ �rff6��- as Emilia ''i ■:H ;a It_.■ .^ ri■sr+r �. t=�. Mills ad 1 _ { f �Y:+r> H ! asa: rs — — life..■�_ ■■ CfeEii� s., - �`-seei■i 3 c! r asru = lu.�� ■■ C ■e u Q /Se.■■_ ■■ C fersr■ _._s.0 Asa.,:. ■�sa®r ��sim� �... �' it r i t ! s� �'; r,H : r �f� ;; ; yr,., /� 0 = — 1■■e■■■.._�!/ ��fia■ p° W': / C li��� � as 1 SMAN mra ■■ i�slrmn 'i ■lH •r -�+ai �6 _ r rl 1�=r��c e■ p tO .r., is¢-- i>«■. ■rye !s I i t i .�lrr; r�a:r lrl. i'846i' / � � a —■/�. r� t I { ■ H r ■ rf „■,•'I / C lffe■■■�o ■f C Malian e�lralaa��}'' d■I i iiH!a,$■1 �:°`■f C It//Ifr f Q ■/m....�c ■■ ■Mier .. _ . � r art. �: >' � .�..■���■ 1 Engel u a i E { '!�i ■iu; 7/�. 01,� lff■..a= as f/1ef .� jl M.aafis w..��■rr, . rrr�s■.■ is f r isiin i fill4me'1°i: �■�: 1•��i� of /fie lip1 ! 1 .Z,I�i ■tAi`i 3A1 ai3c ■� �l/e■...�— of ■/Ira 1`gawk'ei SSW t -I t I�'i�.l■IH;�. atifis f0 Region O!w air, ■aili v 5ia�:. ; .91fF,.._ / � G �lff/..■..— Me � Mains an � i■trYa�` a,c! i�j E/ '':u . _ ��./. ��Is�s��� � � /�:. i.a low ■,,! !a asl : fla : / ■ lff■■.,ram- ■■ ;//le■ ir lira t tr ■- ' / i '1 :i -:1C i f POWL Ir.i[''1 ■■� �, ;. iS3'i t� tE s B tea. ■ � -� ��� �.�. AFL �mro��■si �. sip■■ _ ..• n.n ■ f� ■j■ INNMI ■NE r■Bf MINE :ram! !r .tillrr— rhru■e �,�.I�!!■nu 1 E _1r11 S !r_ loll n ilingionmiminglims IN in I: iiIIIIN It assume 14 1111 It IIIN it mounts U 1,47.so 17 1,wo league* '.400111111111 m 411i"M wool. 1ki, is I! in av"mn 111111all 11 I'm :*unman 102811MINIMINJINVI in somas* m Ill. in $novas :1 ltionimmw*ammll so 01j.1 A **"go up mi 1z q I IN I all i, 0*wslon n fill, 0 jmval.- iusslaseumoolisc— 191 1, to season I.: Villagon q Ira I in m 11118.* M 11 a. ifivoloonsomik 1AN i"! LW; seemed, C flf NMI moNdmoselonl`.z 'a [IN 1 1; angling NEC!snmv,, IN m C I steman .1; 11111 n mi. - lis. Ci to !-I F, alleges All WI! go to I� assess 01 dill.l. 17 soling 0 IN 1!u WIS. .1 no,, IRIA NMI. A Woolli 10000051 summwai lmmonsi low Lalov�j owlg -ilia In NONNI somaiiullongin 2 IsMINN-1111111 NONNI lomm ------- Ir -4. '.6 Wei, i=§6 it *==161 la=mm 4 ANEW&!- A!AI!- *Af IIUIiL�j LI-111-��111li iffolllifNil nt loI �,111 "1;1�Jwlrl 1!1Z1ia 1 mil nipO"Ifitii -Irmiismi BxkL- 1i 0 Submitted record � in rc item � PROJECT NAME PARK PLACE at BRICKELL M.U.S.P. Application Set DEVELOPERS FM RACE, LLC SIS hidd kMw sL* 1010 Wiw4 FL 33131 NL 0"M M ArdiilWur� - Erpnwriip - na n:v Inbrior D••�, - La+d�mp� Dery 2601 L k0mwDhw k* 1000 WAlk FL33133 fi 3054SILM bL 205 M-M KEY FAN �N REVISIONS SEAL 0 WLLYX mow, LA. n. ACMICfl. WsM 00072M hojed No. 20006.000 Scats V - 20.0' Dab: Jury 30, 20D0 Drawn: JA. Chodod: S.S./W.B. Flo Naar H:Wch\M*j "\ 20008laM Dmwhq TdW F.A.R. GROUND FLOOR PLAN - ALL PHASES Dmwiip Woo No. FAR-0.0 0 • • BRICKELL AVENUE I a a I PHASE E' _� — — — PHASE — —) :) Submitted in o the---------------------------------------� recor in con Aubli item VVI Ell orl—-----------------------------------------------------� Iter Foeman I I I I City Clerk I I I I I I I I � PROJECT NAME PARK PLACE at BRICKELL M.U.S.P. Application Set DEVELOPERS ►ARK MAM UC $* &khd A wwe.%h 1010 Afwn4 FL 33131 VL 3"1.W ARCHITECT 1.Design Manning awl & &" w Drin kb Iwo MumL FL33133 wL 30549-M000 L'.30UP-WX KEY PLAN 0 wurw es�ew,u R Aer1RSf td./1D.e MOOQ/n0 FhoW Na 2000°.000 Soele: 1' - 20W Dole: June 30, 2000 Drown: JA Ch-,&@& &B. / WA FikNmr: N:WChvMede\ MOOPIRM Drowhr° rNe F.A.R. 2nd FLOOR PLAN - ALL PHASES Dmwin° Sher No. FAR-0.1 • C7 BRICKELL AVENUE — — — PIIASE�PHASE� I- --------------------------------------- Submitted into the pu c recor in conn ction with item .&� on —16 Wa Pter Foeman I I I I I I I I I I PROJECT NAME PARK PLACE at BRICKELL M.U.S.P. Application Set DEVELOPERS PARK RACE, LLC W iihl Awns 5& 1010 Mari, K 33131 1A 3054714M ARCHITECT bn:Jriodun - Erginowirg - Ronnirg IninKar Dniyn • tand000pnr Dnwipn 2601 i kpkm Drip &61000 No* R.33133 143MM-2M im30saS .%X KEY PLAN G)N ItEValONS SEAL 0 WLLYA �A{lQ, RA ILMO/IR.T�D. WaMWP77f10 Projnne No. 20008.000 scab: 1' - 20'-0` DaM Jun» 30, 2000 Dram: JA chaJmd: M / WX Fib Nam: H:Wdr\h*ds\ 2000a1d2\ Drawing Ti* F.A.R. 3rd - 4th FLOOR PLAN - ALL PHASES Drawing P" Na F�t�o=21036 PROJECT NAME .7 • BRICKELL AVENUE Submitted into the public recor n onnection with item �a►�erFoer�an---------- City Clerk i i i i _. — -(__"-SE LFMU _) F--------------------------------------- I ---------------------------------------� i PARK P LAC E at BRICKELL M.U.S.P. Application Set DEVELOPERS FNJ!!C RACE, LLC W w" hwa sdb 1010 WwnL R 33131 ARCHITECT New ng Irdvlor Dwipn • tanduoprr DNiv 2601 & k"hwn D Ws sir 1DDD kimi, FL33133 hL 30 R.= foL 3OM-9638 KEY RAN G k11 f6?iI510N5 SFAL 0 MYA MININO. to !L AMCWM TMD. NO --At 01073M Project No. 20006.000 Scab. 1' — 20'40' Ddw Jun.30, 2000 Drown: JA Chocked: &B. / WA RM Nce H:Vvch\Pro0c1s\ 200064d2\ F.A.R. 5th - 7th FLOOR PLAN - ALL PHASES Dr..*. Shm No. FA�8-31036 19 10 Submit reCo item I � 0 IECT NAME kRK ACE ZICKELL I.S.P. Application 10PERS PAW IMAGE, LLC 10""MSA 1010 Mknr FL 33131 bUM- 7 -M ARCHITECT (M Jvdril�dun - Errgirwring - Manning Dwip+- land.-,. D•�+ar M S. M1dow Drive st+an 1000 W=4 FL33133 W. 305351.20501a. 305.0.%X KEY MAN G N UVOKM SEAL 0 wuYA.M ANW,Uw ti AK7rtCf IM NO-- It CtIW= Proud No. 2000E.ODD scai.: 1.. 20'-7 Ddr. Jww 30, 2000 Dmwre JA. c1»dwd: ae.iw.e. i� Narnc N:WchVro�� 20005\WA Drawing rdra F.A.R. 8th FLOOR PLAN ALL PHASES Drawng Shod No. F °� 0 3 6 0 E Submitted record in item_ i W '\1 / W Am BRICKELL AVENUE I PHASE�PFIASE 2� - I --—------------ — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Ci Clerk I i----------- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I PROJECT NAME PARK P LAC E at BRICKELL M.U.S.P. Application Set DEVELOPERS PARK MACE, LLC 383k Wkur W k* 1010 AQmi, FL 33131 14 30S3714206 ARCHITECT (0 Mdfibdurs - E� r�qq - F'bnnGq Mrb m Daign - LaaarKo,; DW, 26M & IWOm Drive Ab 1000 Alias(. FL33133 %L Mo 4000 Ar.30665 .%X MOTAMni M!WqMWj LW,61 0 wurr.IMWRW, u n. NCH"Cr MM NO, Mr ammo Ft*d No. 20M.000 $001.: r - W-M Dab: Jury 30, 2000 Drawn: JA. ch.dka: ae.iw.e. k Nan»: FtVuch\ft*c►\ 2000fta F.A.R. 9th FLOOR PLAN - ALL PHASES Drawl go* No. P AR-7.5 36 r � • Submitted record in item %-4 • PH- 21 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 t 302229 30M 7? 2?4r 2►-P 1!4 ar o 2r-? 1P W N-V I I( 2f-7f era 2r-0' rir 2r-0' Z!k lrr 2r-0' 1R11f OPASE 1 PHASE 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1"w 11f 6' -IF ' A P A I F 14 g i 1 ------ 771 — 7777777M,8 I ��p 1�I 1® 7 sm , fID 1Tl7 I TYR T I I Im 1 1 1 IAn Me 7 qq I LOW R� I > 51110010 I w�1 ,fir D rw `1MW snlalo wc& 4& -----Uj- -4 II I I I I i I I II I I I I I I MUSE 1 - 101h FLOOR PHASE 1 • 111h - 33rd FLOOR (23 floors) F.A.R. Caleu6 ions FAR Cakulotions FAR. 10,972 s.f. FAR 295,872 s f. Non -FAR PHASE 1 TOWER 882 s.f. PHASE 1 TOWER Non -FAR 20,286 s.f. 1Oth FLOOR PLAN �• ox•f' �"' 11th - 33rd FLOOR PLAN CC.W 0af. GN ToWI 316158sf. 1 '•emu r _ ,� is „ nx T0101 (j— 11 854s.f. �� L I/ IQ — I -V I/ IV — I -V 8 9 20� X W V U 7 S R X-W 2r-0` 2F-V IF& MY` 2, 7 10 12 14 16 18 19 29-71' 1&0 2r-0' 2I-0' 2r-0' 1r�P tr�0 2f-71' PHASE 3 P E, 2� 4PHASE 2 I / I I qur I I I i1 a• E 2 —•- - .— ,� I — I '�i'• I '� i1 � , so , s2o , s2o 3 -I 1j=! • ■� 2 1 r I m • 4 w�+ sRw ZF into the \ Public ction with . On Wai er Foeman City Clerk FP �E 2 - 1 37rd FLOOR (2811oors) FJREC nla�p� aalions40rd FLOOR (31 floors) PHASE 2 TOWER FAR- Non - FAR. 253,696s.f. 24,472 s.f. FAR. Non - FAR. PHASE 3 TOWER (ROTATED CLOCKWISE) 331,638Lf. 27,342 Lf. 1 Oth - 37th FLOOR PLAN - cam• off. G" (� 1 Oth - 40th FLOOR PLAN Tdal osf. 358,980 w.f. N ToM 30816as.f. — � OILALC: I/ 1 O- = 1'-V- I `-/ OL^LC: I/ 10- = 1'-V" — i PROJECT NAME PARK PLACE at BRICKELL M.U.S.P. Application Set DEVELOPERS ►ARK MCE, LLC 6N 1MiddJxsna sale 1010 Wmi, fL 33131 ARCHITECT Ardxfd,,,.. lrrswYp . nanninp Ir,lsrior Dsipn • laxicnps Gwyn 2101Lk we0riw Ss61000 Mhif4 R33133 hL 305-0•3010 to 30b16 .%X KEY FLAN REVISIONS SEAL 0 wsLY/. sessilO, RA n./7CHnmTvm N0_ NI0007200 Prajsd No. 20008.000 Scats: 1/le - 1' r Dow Jsrw 30, 2000 Drawn: JA Ch«1.d: S.B./W.B. Ne Nana: H:Wch\Prolscb\ 20000\d Drawing r& F.A.R. TOWER UNITS PLAN - ALL PHASES Dmwirp 9" No. FAR-0.6 00-1036 • • Subrnitted into the item in ConneC publ m on t/on wit Walter�� man City CIe; • D I%I%,I%L LA. P%Y G11 �`1\1UL — irnm nn ea � SOUTH MIAMI AVENUE 4_PHAbE�PHASE.2_4 I PHASE�PHAK 1_4 eo - — VAi1LT � —. � 1Foomm UK P� PHASE 3 PHASE_2� — — — PHASE�P— I—) — — — — — — PLANT LIST SOADDL 115®O" nA1+ PLANT NAME HEIGHT SPACING QUANITTY Scientific Common QUERCUS VIRGINIANA LIVE OAK 16'-0' to 18'-0e 10'-CY to 12'-Or 38 ROYSTONEA REGIA CUBAN ROYAL PALM 24'-W to 26'-0' 1 U'-W to 151-01 15 ® BURSERA SIMAFOUBA GUMBO LIMBO 14'-0• to 161-0' 1(Y4r to 12'-CY 11 MYRCIANTHES FRAGRANS SIMPSONS STOPPER I (Y4Y - 12'-V 4'-0" - 6'4Y 20 PROJECT NAME PR"'K PLACE at BRICKELL M.U.S.P. Application Set DEVELOPERS PARK PLACE, LLC WKWIAxmnsa.1010 Atari, F. 33131 ARCHITECT ArchitecWro •Eire • Planning Inferior oeaen-IandeooPe Dooign 2601S.BD mDrim Su3e10B0 Mimi PL33133 46 30&0.2050 Im130SJ199.90 KEY PLAN ir Gr° &MONS SEAL 0 WeLY& eSYRW, LA. R ARCHff=9. N0.:A1 000770D Projed No. 20008,000 Swb: 1' - 20'40' Dale: Juno 30, 2000 Drawn: JA Chedord: S.B. / W.B. Flo Nmrn: H.W6\ProjKb\ 20=\ed2\ Drawing Tr% GROUND FLOOR PLANTING PLAN ALL PHASES Drawing Sheet No. L-O.O QO-1036 • • 'a a) C ) ff ,o -., v 0 ` U w C c cv coal U 03 C.) �J '` Now SOUTH MIAMI AVENUE PHASE_ L�E 2_) (_PHASE 2 I PHASE,1 u !i KM.d r n, MIMI�MIN KIM yy% lr/+ �M BRICKELL AVENUE PHASE 3 1 PHA' SE 2� _ _ _ _ _ RASE 2 PHASE 1 PLANT LIST UMo" 17/Jl PLANT NAME HEIGHT SPACING QUANTITY Scientific Common BOUGAINVILLEA SPECIES BOUGAINVILLEA 11-6° to 2'-0' 2'-0° to 3'4r 784 PROJECT NAME PARK PLACE at B SCKELL M.U.S.P. Application Set DEVELOPERS PARK PLACE, LLC W&"AM"sA1010 NCmei, FL 33131 hL X"n52M ARCHITECT (M Ars deftm - Eng6rooting - P mng h terror Deegn • Lorldoaope Damgn 2601 & Owdmla DM Su& WD Mimi FL33133 W, 305 W-2060 fac 3M-M- 6X KEY PLAN GM RPM" SEAL 0 WLLY A WfAnO, LA. 'L A%CHU IIM MM: AR 0W7M ftied No. 2DD08,0W Scdo: 1' = 20'40' Date: Ann 30, 20W Dmwn: JA Chedwd: S.B./W.B. No No H:WrhVWpcfz\ 20006\sd2\ Drawing TWO TYP. PARKING PLANTING PLAN ALL PHASES Drawirg She* No. L-®e 1 00-1036' C] • U E` • inn n nn nn SOUTH MIAMI AVENUE �_M AW Lp. 2_4 PHASE 2 PHASE 1� BRICKELL AVENUE Q I PLANT LIST SYMWL tea+ nu+ PLANT NAME HEIGHT SPACING QUANTffY Scienfilk Common TABEBUTAIMPETIGINOSA PURPLETRUMPTREE 17-0'to14'4r 17-0'to14'-0' 4 ROYSTONEA REGIA CUBAN ROYAL PALM 241-V to 26'-O' 104r to 15'-O' 55 JASMINE VOWBILE WAX JASMINE V-0to 24Y V-6' to 7-0° 628 ® STEMOTAPHRUM SECUNDATUM ST. AUGUSTINE SOD NA NA 2,326 wF [VORA'NORAGRANT' IVORA 7-0'to 3'-O' 7-0'to 3'-0' 1,065 I:. i.�r�.f zi, _ yew �� a�c� PROJECT NAME PARK PLACE at BRICKELL M.U.S.P. Application Set DEVELOPERS PARR RACE, LLC Bib ftm Amw5uih 1010 Mia* FL 33131 kL 3054n-529 ARCHITECT (D Amf&x ura - Eng'Dreorirg - Plannkg kdarior Dmign - .dttoi>e Dom+ 2601 & Dwdm DrW Su IWO Micv4 FL32133 bl,WAW2050 fwL305b -?M KEY PLAN Gra RIVMI" sm 0 WUY A. IOWA=, Rw R ACCHnWT MG. ua.: AD OWMD Project No. 20008.000 SoDb: 1. = 20-0' Dace: Juror 30, 2000 Drawn: JA Chedmd: S.B./W.B. File Nana: KW6\Pr0j6k\ 200094d2\ Drawing T& 9th FLOOR PLANTING PLAN ALL PHASES Dmwing L®0.2 00-1036 0 • PARK PLACE AT ERICKELL MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT 1450 Brickell Avenue Miami, Florida Prepared by: BERMELLO AJAMIL & PARTNERS GREENBERG TRAURIG ATTORNEYS AT LAW SHARPTON, BRUNSON & COMPANY, P.A. JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P. E. June 7, 2000 (Revised 8100) A PROJECT OF PARK PLACE LLC. Submitted into the public. recorA_in connection with item I" ��� on /-LZ a Walter Foeman City Cleric as--1036 Avi r e S� . 4 - her- t-ONO,. } 46 ew Ake • PARK PLACE: AT BRICKELL MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT Table of Contents Article I. Project Information Submitted into the public recoro, in connection with A. Application for a Major Use Special Permit item jJZ- on Walter Foeman As per Zoning Ordinance 11000 City Clerk 1. MUSP, per Article 17 for development of 918 residential units. 2. MUSP, per Article 17 for a parking structure of 1,374 parking spaces. 3. MUSP, as per Article 5, for a PUD. 4. Special Exception as per; Article 9, Section 917.2.1 to allow valet parking for restaurant up to 50% of ;existing off-street parking spaces. 5. Special Exception as per Article 6, Section 607 to allow bar/lounge open to the public within the SD-,5 District. 6. Variance, pursuant to the City Miami Zoning Ordinance 11000, as amended, Article 6, Section 607, for one ground level setback requested along the interior yard (adjacent to the existing alleyway) from the required 15'-0" down to 6"-6". 7. Variance, pursuant to the City of Miami Zoning Ordinance 11000, as amended, Article 6, Section 607, for one upper level setback requested along the interior yard (adjacent to the existing alleyway) from the required (above 40') 1:6 slope to a max of 40' down to 6'-6". 8. Variance, pursuant to the City Miami Zoning Ordinance 11000, as amended, Article 6, Section 607, for one ground level setback requested along the north interior yard from the required 15'-0" down to 3". 9. Variance, pursuant to the City of Miami Zoning Ordinance 11000, as amended, Article 6, Section 607, for one upper level setback requested along the north interior yard from the required (above 40')1:6 slope to a max of 40' down to 3'. 10. Class 11 Special Permit' as per Article 6, Section 607.3.1 for temporary construction fence and covered walkway. 11. Class II Special Permit a;s per Article 6, Section 607.3.1 for development of new construction within a Special District 12. Class I I Special Permit as per Article 9, Section 923.4 providing a total of 12 berths, six (6) berths at 12 feet x 35 feet and six (6) berths reduced to 10 feet x 20 feet where twelve 12 feet x 35 feet are required (four per phase). 13. Class 11 Special Permit, as per Article 6, Section 607.3.1 for temporary construction trailer. 14. Class II Special Permit to waive certain requirements of Brickell Promenade Design Development Plan and Urban Guidelines. 15. Class I I Special Permit as per Section 908.2 for access from a public street roadway width greater than 25 feet. 16. Class I Special Permit as per Section 915.2 for FAA clearance letter. 17. Class I Special Permit as per Article 9, Section 906.6 for pool/outdoor recreation area 18. Class I Special Permit as per Article 9, Section 917.2.1 to allow valet parking for residential uses. 19. Class I Special Permit as per Article 9, Section 925.3.8 to allow development/construction/rental signage. 20. Request for the following MUSP conditions to be required at time of shell permit instead of at issuance of foundation permit: A. The requirement to provide a letter of assurance for the Solid Waste Department; and B. The requirement to record in the Public Records a Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions providing that the ownership, operation and maintenance of all common areas and facilities will be by the property owner or a mandatory property owner association; and C. The requirement to record in the Public Records a unity of title or covenant in lieu of unity of title. 21. Per City Code, Section 23-5a, Request for a Certificate of Appropriateness as per the City Code for ground disturbing activity in an archeological conservation area. 22. Per City Code, Chapter 36. Construction Equipment, Request for waiver of noise ordinance while under construction for continuos pours. 23. Request for Reservation of Downtown Development of Regional Impact (DRI) credits. 24.. Park Place LLC. is requesting that with the approval of the MUSP, the City allocate DRI credits for 918 residential units and 22,823 square feet of retail use. 25. Designation as a phased development pursuant to Section 2502 of Ordinance No. 11000. B. Disclosure of Ownership C. Ownership Affidavit D. Directory of Project Principals E. Project Data Sheet F. Zoning Atlas Page Article II. Project Description A. Zoning Ordinance N. 11000 A. Section 1304.2.1 Application Forms; Supplementary Materials B. Section 1702.2.1 General Report C. Section 1702.2.2 Major Use Special Permit Concept Plan D. Section 1702.2.3 Development Impact Study Submitted into the public recoo in connection with item 1� on ./ i�/G-Q9 Walter Foeman City CleA( 0 0 — iy a • 0 • 11 Adrienne Friesner Pardo (305) 579-0683 Direct Fax: (305) 961-5683 E-Mail: pardoa@gtlaw.com GGEENBGGG A T T O R N E Y S A T L A W Ms. Teresita Fernandez Clerk, Hearing Boards City of Miami 444 S.W. 2nd Avenue, 71h Floor Miami, FL 33130 l� U June 7, 2000 Re: Letter of Intent for Park Place at Brickell Dear Teresita: Submitted into the public reco in connection with item fZzLL on ZLG -o-d Walter Foeman City Clerk On behalf of Park Place, LLC, the contract purchaser, we are submitting a Major Use Special Permit ("MUSP") application for approval of the following: A. Application for a MUSP as per Zoning Ordinance 11000 for the following: 1. MUSP per Article 17 for development of 918 residential units. 2. MUSP per Article 17 for a parking structure of 1,374 parking spaces. 3. MUSP as per Article 5 for a Planned Unit Development to utilize a 9% floor area ratio bonus. 4. Special Exception as per Article 9, Section 917.2.1 to allow valet parking for restaurant up to 50% of existing off-street parking spaces. 5. Special Exception as per Article 6, Section 607 to allow bar/lounge open to the public within the SD-5 district. 6. Variance for one ground level setback requested along the interior yard (adjacent to the existing alleyway) from the required 15'-0" to 6"-6". 7. Variance for -one upper level setback requested along the interior yard (adjacent- to the existing alleyway) from the required (above 40') 1:6 slope to a max of 40' to 6"-6". 8. Variance for one ground level setback requested along the north interior yard from the required 15-0" to 3". 9. Variance for one. upper level setback requested along the north interior yard from the required (above 40') 1:6 slope to a max of 40' to 3". 10. Class II Special Permit as per Article 6, Section 607.3.1 for temporary construction fence and covered walkway. 11. Class II Special Permit as per Article 6, Section 607.3.1 for development of new construction within the SD-5 Special District GREENBER•G TRAURIG, P.A. 9 1221 BRICKELL AVENUE. MIAMI,.FLOBiDA`33131 305-579-0500 FAX 305-579-0717 www.g.tiaw.com MIAMI NEW YORK WASHINGTON, D.C. ATLANTA PHILADELPHIA MCLEAN CHICAGO BOSTON PHOENIX WILMINGTON SAO PAULO FORT LAUDERDALE BOCA RATON WEST PALM BEACH ORLANDO TALLAHASSEE ® public. 0 Ms. Teresita Fernandez Submitted into the ne June 7, 2000 recor. i I c®on JJ J ction with item W Page 2 alter Foeman 0 City Clerk 12. Class II Special Permit as per Article 9, Section 923.4 providing a total of 12 berths, six (6) berths at 12 feet x 35 feet and six (6) berths reduced to 10 feet x 20.feet where twelve 12 feet x 35 feet are required (four per phase). 13. Class II Special Permit as per Article 6, Section 607.3.1 for temporary construction trailer. 14. Class II Special Permit to waive certain requirements of Brickell Promenade Design Development Plan and Urban Guidelines.. 15. Class II Special Permit as per Section 908.2 for access from a public street roadway width greater than 25 feet. 16. Class I Special Permit as per Section 915.2 for FAA clearance letter. 17. Class I Special Permit as per Article 9, Section 906.6 for pool/outdoor recreation area. 18. Class I Special Permit as per Article 9, Section 917.2.1 to allow valet parking for residential uses. 19. Class I Special Permit as per Article 9, Section 925.3.8 to allow development/construction/rental signage. B. Request for the following MUSP conditions to be required at time of temporary or permanent Certificate of Occupancy instead of at issuance of foundation permit: 1. The requirement to record in the Public Records a Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions providing that the ownership, operation and maintenance of all common areas and facilities will be by the property owner or a mandatory property owner association; and 2. The requirement to record in the Public Records a unity of title or covenant in lieu of unity of title. C. Request for a Certificate of Appropriateness as per the City Code for ground disturbing activity in an archeological conservation area. D. Request for waiver of noise ordinance per City Code to waive noise provisions while under construction for continuos pours. E. Request for Reservation of Downtown. Development of Regional Impact (DRI) credits.. 1. Park Place LLC, is requesting that with the approval of the GREENBERG TRAURIG 0 0 - 106 90 6 • • • Ms. Teresita Fernandez June 7, 2000 Page 3 r1 U MUSP, the City allocate DRI .credits for 918 residential units and 22,823 square feet of retail use. F. Designation as a phased development pursuant to Section 2502 of Ordinance No. 11000. MIAMI/PARDOA/1146584/ kpk011.DOC/6/07/00/99999.457721 Very truly yours, Adrienne Friesner Pardo Submitted into the public record in connection with item �" on —/ -ud Walter Foeman City Clerk GREENBERG TRAURIG 6 0 -16 3 6 • • Submitted into the public record in connection with item on L /-16 -� CITY OF MIAMI Walter Foeman DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPM'�lerk APPLICATION FOR MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT IT IS INTENDED THAT MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERNUTS BE REQUIRED WHERE SPECIFIED USES AND/OR OCCUPANCIES INVOLVE MATTERS DEEMED TO BE OF CITYWIDE OR AREA -WIDE IMPORTANCE. THE CITY COMMISSION SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR DETERMINATIONS ON APPLICATIONS FOR MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMITS. (SEE ARTICLE 17 OF ORDINANCE 11000, AS AMENDED, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CnT OF MIAMI. FLORIDA.) THE CITY COMMISSION SHALL REFER ALL APPLICATIONS FOR MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMITS TO THE PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD AND TO THE DIRECTOR OF THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT FOR RECOMMENDATIONS, AND.MAY MAKE REFERRALS.TO - ' AGENCIES, BODIES, OR OFFICERS, EITHER THROUGH THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT OR DIRECTLY, FOR REVIEW, ANALYSIS AND/OR TECHNICAL FINDINGS AND DETERMINATIONS AND REPORTS THEREON. (SEE SEC27ON 1301.5 OF ORDINANCE 11000, AS AMENDED, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CPIYOFMMkf, FLORIDA.) SECTION 2-653 OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF WAN% FLORIDA, AS AMENDED, GENERALLY REQUIRES ANY PERSON WHO RECEIVES COMPENSATION, REMUNERATION OR EXPENSES FOR CONDUCTING LOBBYING ACTIVITIES TO REGISTER AS A LOBBYIST V= THE CITY CLERK, PRIOR TO ENGAGING IN LOBBYING ACTIVITIES BEFORE CITY STAFF, BOARDS, COMMITTEES AND THE CITY COMMISSION. A COPY OF SAID ORDINANCE IS AVAILABLE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK (NIIAMI = HALL), LOCATED AT 3500 PAN AMERICAN DRIVE, MIAN% FLORIDA, 33133. NOTE: THIS APPLICATION MUST BE TYPEWRITTEN AND SIGNED IN BLACK INK Adrienne F. Pardo on behalf of Park Place, L.L.C., the Contract Purchaser hereby apply to the Director of the Department of Planning and Development of the City of Miami for approval of a Major Use Special Permit under the provisions of Article 17 of the City of Miami Zoning Ordinance. Property Address: See Exhibit "3" Nature of proposed use (be specific): A MUSP' for 9 18 residential units See Zoning Write Up attached as Exhibit "2" APPLICATION MATERIALS I attach the following in support anti explanation of the application: D •a 1. Two original surveys, prepared by a State of Florida Registered Land Surveyor within. one year from the date of application. 2. Affidavit disclosing ownership of forms 4-83 and 4a-83 to application). covered by application and disclosure of interest form (attach Page Iof2 00-1036 i • APPLICATION MATERIALS (continued) I attach the following in support and explana of the application: Submitted into the public record in connection with item !�L-t N on r-! -Gd Walter Foeman City Clek El 3. Certified list of owners of real estate within a 375-foot radius from the outside boundaries of property (attach form 6-83 to application). ff! 4. Maps of the: a) Existing zoning designation. b) Adopted comprehensive plan designation for areas on and around the property. ® 5. General location map showing relation to the site or activity to major streets, schools, existing utilities, shopping areas, important physical features in and adjoining the project, and the like. U 6. Concept Plan a) Site plan and relevant information per Section 1304.2.1d-h. b) Relationships to surrounding existing and proposed futures uses and activities, systems and facilities, per Section 1702.3.2a. c) How concept affects, existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan principles and designations; tabulation of any required variances, special permits, changes of zoning or exemptions, per Section 1702.3.2b. ® 7. Developmental Impact Study (an application for development approval for a Development of Regional Impact may substitute). 0 8. Other (be specific): 13 9. Fee of $ 45 , 000 , for the Maj ir Use Special Permit, based on current fee schedule as set forth in Chapter 62 of the Code of the City of Miami, as amended. , C.3 10. Additional fee of $ 5 8 , 94 S . 3 0 , for any required special permits, -changes of zoning or variances set forth in chapter 62 of the Code of the City of Miami, as amended. Total Fee: $ 10 3, 9 4 5. 3 0 1 Signature r'. Name Qrlr1enne T7. Partin Address 1221 Rr1.CkP11. 41ren7i,-, Minmi,l F1 S3131 Phone/Fax (305)579-0683 / (305)961-5683 Date CO I FINAL APPROVAL OF THIS APPLICATION FOR MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT SHALL CONSIST OF AN EXECUTED RESOLUTION BY THE MIAMI CITY COMMISSION AND A DEVELOPMENT ORDER ATTACHED THERETO WHICH SPECIFIES THE CONDITIONS UNDER WHICH THIS MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT APPLICATION IS APPROVED; IF APPROVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION, SAID RESOLUTION AND DEVELOPMENT ORDER SHALL, UPON EXECUTION THEREOF, BE TRANSMITTED TO THE OWNER OR AUTHORIZED AGENT AT THE ADDRESS SPECIFIED ABOVE. Page 2of2 ~ 00-1036 El 0 9 Submitted into the public record in connection with CITY OF MIANII item on _i rlG—ad OF HEARING BOARDS Walter Foeman City Clerk CATION FOR SECTION 2-653 OF THE CODE OF THE CITY ANY PERSON WHO RECEIVES COMPENSi LOBBYING ACTIVITIES TO REGISTER AS A LOBBYING ACTIVITIES BEFORE CITY STA COPY OF SAID ORDINANCE IS AVAILABL: LOCATED AT 3500 PAN AMERICAN DRIVE, NOTE: THIS APPLICATION OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, AS AMENDED, GENERALLY REQUIRES �TION, REMUNERATION OR EXPENSES FOR CONDUCTING LOBBYIST WITH THE CITY CLERK, PRIOR TO ENGAGING IN FF, BOARDS, COMMITTEES AND THE CITY COMMISSION. A E IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK (MIAMI CITY HALL), MlAMI, FLORIDA, 33133. Within the City generally, or within certain zi specified in this ordinance are of a nature rec or not they should be permitted in specific k safeguards which should be applied as rewc Zoning Ordinance and, in particular, to pi' avoidable potentially adverse effects. It is Zoning Board be exercised in making such dt and limitations relating to Special Exceptions BE TYPEWRITTEN AND SIGNED IN BLACK INK. ing districts, certain structures, uses, and/or occupancies iring special and intensive review to determine whether ations, and if so, the special limitations; conditions, and nably necessary promote the general purposes of this tect adjoining properties and the neighborhood from irther intended that the expertise and judgment of the :rminations, in accordance with the rules, considerations lee Article 16 of the Zoning Ordinance). Formal public notice and hearing is mandatory for Special Exceptions. The Zoning Board shall be solely responsible for determinations on applications for Special Exceptions except when otherwise provided for in the City Code. All applications shall be referred to the Director of the Department Planning and Development for his recommendations and the Director shall make any further referrals required by these regulations. Adrienne F. Pardo on beha I, approval of a Special Exception for the property I See attached folio number see at specific): 1) for valet parking open to the public. In support of this application, the fol of Park Place; L.L.C., the Contract Purchaser hereby apply to the City of Miami Zoning Board fai ted at Bricke11 Avenue & SE 1Sth Road hed Exhibit 17. ' . Nature of Proposed Use (please be for la restaurant and- 2) for a bar/lounge X 1. Two original surveys of the property year from the date of application. material is submitted. by a State of Florida Registered Land Surveyor within one X2. Four copies -signed and sealed by a State of Florida Registered Architect or Engineer -of site plans showing (as required) property boundaries, existing (if any) and proposed structure(s), parking, landscaping, etc.; building elevations and dimensions and 'computations of lot area and building spacing. 00-1036 0- • X 3. Affidavits disclosing ownership of F to application): X 4. Certified list of owners of real estate by the application. ' X 5. At least two photographs that show the X 6. Recorded warranty, deed and tax forms the property. X 7. Other (Specify and attach cover letters application). Submittal of T 9! 8. Fee of $ -0 Zoning Ordinance: to apply Special Exception .................... Special Exception requiring Extension of time for special Public hearing mail notice fees, handling and mailing per notice. Surcharge equal to applicable fee dollars ($800.00) except from age to the applicant if there is no appe and seventy-five (375) feet of the Submitted into the public recor in connection with item � Ll on Walter Foeman City Clerk covered by applications and disclosure of interest from (attached a 375-foot radius of the outside boundaries of property covered property (land and improvements). the most current year available that show the present owner(s) of ining why any document you are attaching is pertinent to this application the cost of processing according to Section 62-156 of the ...............................................................$ 800.00 city commission review .... ................... $2,000.00 ............................................................$ 500.00 ig cost of ............................................................$ 3.50 )m item above, not to exceed eight hundred ies of the city; such surcharge to be refunded from a property owner within three hundred bject property. Signature 4. Name Adrienne F. Pardo Address 1221 Brickell Avenue Miami, FL 33131 Telephone (305) 579-0500 Date A� oo-1036 0 STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE • The foregoing instrument was acknowledged ,i20001 by Adrienne F. Pardo • produced -r- STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE The foregoing instrument was acknowledged 1.9 , by a He/She is personally known to me or has and who did (did not) take an oath. STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE The foregoing instrument was acknowledged 19 , by produced Submitted into the public • record in connection,, with itern2 on L.L,_/_6=�t" Walter i=oeman City Clerk me this day of� who is Rmonall nQwn to me or who has as4dentifcaticn-and-who-did (did not) take an oath. Name: Notary Public-tate o a SFirir - F. Lti►►.ivom1,: Commission No.: MARISOLRGQPj7,'J:'' M Commission Ex �T'3`'lTA' {FL F.LICS 'I' r ^�� y co me this day of of corporation, on behalf of the corporation. as identification Name: Notary Public -State of Florida Commission No.: My Commission Expires: me this day of partner (or agent) on behalf of a partnership. He/She is personally known to me or who has as identification and who did (did not) take an oath. Name: Notary Public -State of Florida Commission No.: My Commission Expires: I� r . ; r L�] 0 • C OFFI OF MIAMI OF HEARING BOARDS SECTION 2-653 OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, AS AMENDED, GENERALLY REQUIRES ANY PERSON WHO RECEIVES COMPENSATION, REMUNERATION OR EXPENSES FOR CONDUCTING LOBBYING ACTIVITIES TO REGISTER AS A LOBBYIST WITH THE CITY CLERK, PRIOR TO ENGAGING IN LOBBYING ACTIVITIES BEFORE CITY STAFF, BOARDS, COMMITTEES AND THE CITY COMMISSION. A COPY OF SAID ORDINANCE IS AVAILABLE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK (MIAMI CITY HALL), LOCATED AT 3500 PAN AMERICAN DRIVE, MIAMI, FLORIDA, 33133. NOTE: THIS APPLICATION MUST BE TYPEWRITTEN AND SIGNED IN BLACK INK. A Variance is a relaxation of the terms of the Zoning Ordinance where such action will not be contrary to the public interest and where owing to conditions peculiar to the property and not the result of actions of the applicant, a literal enforcement of this Ordinance would result in unnecessary and undue hardship on the properly As used in the Zoning Ordinance, a Variance is authorized only for height, area, size of structure, dimensions of yards, other open spaces, off-street parking and/or loading requirements (see Article 19 of the. Zoning Ordinance). I, Adrienne F. Pardo. on behalt of petition the City of Miami Zoning Board for a V affecting property located at In support of this application, the X 1. Two original surveys of the property from the date of application. Place LLC, contract purchaser , hereby from the terms of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, " , folio number See attached as specified below. material is submitted. by a State of Florida Registered Land Surveyor within one year X 2. Four copies -signed and sealed by a State of Florida Registered Architect or Engineer -of site plans showing (as required) property boundaries, existing (if any) and proposed structure(s), parking, landscaping, etc.; building elevations and dimensions and computations of lot area and building spacing. _X 3. Affidavits disclosing ownership of property covered by applications and disclosure of interest form (attached to application). X 4. Certified list of owners of real estate within a 375-foot radius of the outside boundaries of property covered by the application. X 5. At least two photographs that show the entire property (land and improvements). Submitted into the public • reco d in connection with ite ^(` f on LLILU Welter Foernan Cii' , Clerk 0 0 0 e�i+ C 0 • X _ 6. Recorded warranty deed and tax forms for the most current year available that show the present owner(s) of the property. X_ 7. Other (Specify and attach cover letters explaining why any document you are attaching is pertinent to this application). A Major Use Special Permit application X_ 8. Fee of $5 8 , 9 4 5 . 3 j; apply toward the cost of processing. according to Section 42456 of the Zoning Ordinance: CS, PR, R 1, R-2, (single-family and duplex residential uses) .................. $ 250.00 Piers, docks, wharves and the hike, for each Variance from the ordinance, per lineal foot........................................................................... $ 45.00 Minimum................................................................................................... $ 700.00 All applications for Variances relating to the same structure shall be assessed a single fee to be calculated per square foot of gross floor area of the proposed structure or addition, based upon the definition of gross floor area found in Section 2502 of Zoning Ordinance, as amended.............................................................................. $ .10 Minimum.......................................................................................•........... $ 650.00 Application for Variance as a result of a change in approved plans or as a result of a violation notice shall be charged an additional fee, per Variance: CS, PR, R- 1, R-2...............................:..........................I........................... $ 250.00 All other residential districts...................................................................... $ 450.00 All nonresidential districts......................................................................... $ 550.00 Extension of time for Variance.................................................................. $ 500.00 Public hearing mail notice fees, including cost of handling and mailing per notice ................................................. :.................................... $ 3.50 Surcharge equal to applicable fee from items above, not to exceed eight hundred dollars (800.00), except from agencies of the City; such surcharge to be refunded to the applicant if there is no appeal Trom a property owner within three hundred and seventy-five (375) feet of the subject property — 9. The Variance request is for relief from the provisions of Section 607 of the City of Miami Zoning Ordinance as follows: Submitted into the pot)6iC See attached ExhibiQCC'" iiln Connection with item . �� On Walter Foeman City Cleric 0 ®-10 3 6 _C . Sut)mitted into thd Public record inl co ®net � on item Waiter Foeman • City Clerk r X 10. In support of the application, the applicant is prepared to offer the following evidence, on the point enumerated at Section 1903 of the City of Miami Zoning Ordinance. Note: This application cannot be accepted for Zoning Board action unless all of the following six items are completed. _X (a) Special conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the land, structure, or building involved and which are not applicable to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same zoning district in that: (list evidence to be produced and use additional sheets, if necessary.) The property is narrow at the north end. Thus, it is impossible to provide an efficient and useable parking garage without obtaining the requested variances. _ X (b) The special conditions and circumstances do not result from the actions of the petitioner in that: The developer has no control 'over the width of the property. (c) Literal .interpretation of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same zoning district under the terms of the Zoning Ordinance and would work unnecessary and undue hardships on the petitioner in that: Denial of the variance would prohibit the developer from providing necessary parking for the project. In addition, the City is in the process of amending the requirement for upper level setbacks and the Planning Advisory Board at its May 31, 2000 meeting recommended approval of said amendment to delete the requirement for upper level setbacks. `X (d) Granting the Variance requested will not confer on the petitioner that special privilege that is denied by the Zoning Ordinance to other lands, buildings, or structures in the same zoning district in that: The granting of the variances does not give the developer additional privileges, and only allows the developer to construct within the zoning ordinance provisions. _X (e) The Variance, if granted, is the minimum Variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the land, building or structure in that: 0 Because of the narrow width, the setback variances are required. • 0 • (f) The grant of the Variance will be in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance, and will not be injurious to the neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare. The variances being granted are adjacent to the alley and the north interior yard and will not be detrimental to the neighborhood. Note: All documents, reports, studies, exhibits or other written or graphic material to be submitted to the Zoning Board shall be submitted with this application. r � Signature ��l : ��r y K"C•C� Name Adrienne F. Pardo Address 1221 Brickell Avenue Miami Florida 33131 Telephone (305) 579-0683 Date Submitted into the Obblib recoro in connection with item `' on Walter Foeman City Clerk 00-1036 • STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this �_ day of —T ` Jt R 2QQO, by —Adrienne F. Pardo who is ersonall kno to me or who has produced as identification and who did (did not) take an oath. Name: _._..>:,..r;­. ,.._ �'A.. Notary 41ic-Stafe,,of fjprida�NIZ 1✓ ,... COrnIrllSSiOn:�10::';"Y..�'"•e.i;��'�i:'1�:. `?'L • .�..rt�,�n Cam',?;`i'�i�S My Commission"Expues ' r.,,� ;� ;• r ************************************************************************************************** TATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 19 , by of a corporation, on behalf of the corporation. He/She is personally known to me or has produced as identification ® and who did (did not) take an oath. Name: Notary Public -State of Florida Commission No.: My Commission Expires: STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 19 , by partner (or agent) on behalf of produced a partnership. He/She is personally known to me or has as identification and who did (did not) take an oath. Name: Notary Public -State of Florida Commission No.: My Commission Expires: Submitted into the public record In connection with item � j`� on _����6-��.. Walter Foeman City Cleric 1� U Exhibit "A" Variance for one ground level setback requested along the interior yard (adjacent to the existing alleyway) from the required 15'-0" down to 6"-617 . Variance for one upper level setback requested along the interior yard (adjacent to the existing alleyway) from the required (above 40') 1:6 slope to a max of 40' down to 6"-6". Variance for one ground level setback requested along the north interior yard from the required 15'-0" down to 3". Variance for one upper level setback requested along the north interior yard from the required (above 40') 1:6 slope to a max of 40' down to 3". Submitted into the public record in connection with on l� jc1 Walter Foeman City Clerk 0Q-06-1 DISCLOSURE OF OWNERSHIP FOR CONTRACT PURCHASER 1. Legal description and street address of subject real property: See attached Exhibit "1" and "3'. 2. Owner(s) of subject real property and percentage of ownership. Note: Section 2-618 of the Code of the City of Miami requires disclosure of all parties having a financial interest, either direct or indirect, in the subject matter of a presentation, request or petition to the City Commission. Accordingly, question #2 requires disclosure of shareholders of corporations, beneficiaries of trust, and/or any other interested parties, together with their addresses and proportionate interest. See attached Exhibit' 4'. 3. Legal description and street address of any real property (a) owned by any party listed in answer to question #2, and (b) located within 375 feet of the subject real property. None Owner or Attorney for Owner Adrienne Friesner Pardo STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE The foregoing instniment was acknowledged before me this _7 day of �� 2000 by Adrienne F. and who is personally known to me or who has produced �--- as identification and who did (did not) take an oath. Name: Notary Public -State a -Florida" ?-4C�r cT�A CommissionNo.:_=?�s My Commission Expires: MLNUMAMES5118759W40q%0II-WC/5101100 Submitted into the public recor 'e connection o item � on Walter Foeman City Clerk 00`H036 DISCLOSURE OF OWNERSHIP FOR OWNER 1. Legal description and street address of subject real property: See attached Exhibit "1" and "3'. 2. Owner(s) of subject real property and percentage of ownership. Note: Section 2-618 of the Code of the City of Miami requires disclosure of all parties having a financial interest, either direct or indirect, in the subject matter of a presentation, request or petition to the City Commission. Accordingly, question #2 requires disclosure of shareholders of corporations, beneficiaries of trust, and/or any other interested parties, together with their addresses and proportionate interest. See attached Exhibit "41' . 3. Legal description and street address of any real property (a) owned by any party listed in answer to question #2, and (b) located within 375 feet of the subject teal property. None Owner or Attorney for Dwner Adrienne Friesner Pardo STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MAMI-DADE The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this fL day of 2000 by Adrienne F. Pardo. who is personally known to me or wWJ has produced as identification and who did (did not) take an oath. Name: Notary Public -State of Florida-- - -•--- - Commissi _ My Commtssion.Exp r S-: - =`"; �''r'' � ;; 1 ; 02 M1AtVU3/JAMESS/ 187590/40q%,01!.DOCJ4R8/00 Submitted into the public recor in connection with item �_ --on (/ a G- Cu Walter 1 oernan City Cleric • 0 • • AFFIDAVIT STATE OF FLORIDA ) ) SS COUNTY OF MIAMI-DARE ) Before me, the undersigned authority, this day personally appeared Adrienne F . Pardo who being by me first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and says: 1. That he/she is the owner, or the legal representative of the owner, submitting the accompanying application for a public hearing as required by the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, affecting the real property located in the City of Miami, as described and listed on the pages attached fo this affidavit and made a part 'thereof. 2. That all owners which he/she represents, if any, have given their full and complete permission for him/her to act in his/her behalf for the change or modification of a classification or regulation of zoning as set out in the accompanying petition. 3. That the pages attached hereto and made a part of this affidavit contain the current names, mailing addresses, telephone numbers and legat descriptions for the real property of which he/she is the owner or legal representative. 4. The facts as represented in the application and documents submitted in conjunction with this affidavit are true and correct. Further Affiant sayeth not. Applicant's Signature STATE OF FLORIDA Adrienne F . Pardo COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADS The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of G� by. Adrienne F . Pardo who is personal known to me erlw� Submitted into the public recordJin connection with item _ --Ll on J —JL--a-o Walter Foeman City Clerk and who did (did not) take an oath. Name: Notary Public State o Florida Commission hTo.: My Commission -Expires:: ` : �.._ .......,. 1111MIM11, • A v SuDmitted into the public record,in connection with item '/`L on / 1-16 � Ise 4er Foeman Owner's Name Park Place, L.L.C. City Clerk Mailing Address 848 Brickell Avenue, Suite 1010, Miami, FL 33131 Zip Code Telephone Number (305) 371-5254 Legal Description: Owner's Name CONTRACT PURCHASER OWNER'S LIST See attached Exhibit "1" Mailing Address Zip Code Telephone Number Legal Description: Owner's Name .ailing Address Zip Code Telephone Number Legal Description: Any other real estate property owned individually, jointly, or severally (by corporation, partnership or privately) within 375 feet of the subject site is listed as follows: -NONE- None Street Address Street Address Street Address Legal Description Legal Description Legal Description Submitted into the public record in connecliGn k,ith item on OWNER'S LIST Walter Foeman City Clerk Owner's Name Brickell Investment Realty Corp. Mailing Address c/o Beatriz Azcui-Diaz, Esq. 701 Brickell Ave, #2100,Miami, Fl Zip Code 33131 Telephone Number (305) 577-3257 Legal Description: See attached Exhibit "1". Owner's Name Mailing Address Zip Code Telephone Number Legal Description: Owner's Name . Mailing Address Zip Code Telephone Number Legal Description: Any other real estate property owned individually, jointly, or severally (by corporation, partnership or privately) within 375 feet of the subject site is listed as follows: Street Address Legal Description None Street Address Street Address Legal Description Legal Description 0-1036 • EXHIBIT 641" GEOAL DESCQIPT10 - XS SMITR /2 Of lOT ; ,41/D LOTS 9 THRU I51tOT1I /,!/CLUSIY�' ; A,UD L07S 17111RU 25, QOT1I /,UCLUSI YE, BLOCK °J9 SOUTH, 'AA/1EU- DED MAP OF BR)MM `S AD/TIOV TO THE W POf M14U1", ,&CO,QDiuG TO T1116PLAT T/IE-?I5Of, h'ECORL D /,vPl,4T64Dk '3',47MOLF 110, OF T1/i' PUSLIC RECORDS OF D4DE XV117Y, ALOR/DA, • ,BUD LOTS 10,4.41.10 10, "WILKI.US01/S SU8D/VIS/011; ACCDROIMO TO Tf/EPLAT T/IFREO ,, RECORDED /,V PU; 5 51 AT P,4GE 2/, Of 7x1F PURL/C RSCDRDS Of TNF PURL/C RECORDS OF Or105 CDU,UTy, FLOR/DA. SSCTID.cl,�9, TOW11S�/P.S�SOVTN, ,�quG�'Q/�ASr C/Ty OF M/QM/, F10.Q/D.4. , // AA�[yA/ A `if) /�•, G 2g� 507. .iT,,: �_� :7. '�' i'� o'- •'•�- rt.���. �::Y, a1 y�:' �� �. 'qcr,.. �'�:. '�; n SO•. •A.:Q ""Hl� KivS NS S 6diV /-.v. :: �01 . . 20 •27 28' 1CBn sS �v" : g,• i �, �¢ sip .�E r+•: °• (\a .. fs:�'-•�, :_+N.�'T:4 A+_ 0,.04 �,�- .S,Q •'l,�' ,2PE_' '..N_ E_�T�• �l;y,F :�.•}^��:� �IG,'Ct�I :.rJO.'\ .�"",' L�•'n• .iT �d 'i; .�.ri SM+ n « �, —= q _ —— — — — — — — — — --- I .a M is u E 7 G S Q 3 2 1 .01 / /a v 27 :y J�. °J$r .. :.50r: .�� ?�s' • N i:. : n'' • s r' / • N' N r e 052Q5� A�liOAnav AAW.4CCswr.GVGf.ai� CQVLvreWAG ..� Elt'CL✓AAf. ,KTAN r 4AG e-47V, LG X0I7eF A i a.Q.6. /G070 , PA6B /3t76 � Submitted into the public rewrd in canneetkovi vAtii item /y on I - LG --yd Walter Foe/+man ®- CityClerk, 00--1036 r , yExhibit 2 PARK PLACE AT BRICKELL MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT Per City Code, Section 23-5a, Request for a Certificate of Appropriateness for ground disturbing activity in an archeological conservation area. Per City Code, Chapter 36. Construction Equipment Request for waiver of noise ordinance white under construction for continuous pours. _ MUSP, per Article 17 for development of 918 residential units. MUSP, per Article 17 for a parking structure of 1,374 parking spaces. MUSP; as per Article 5, for a PUD. Special Exception as per Article 9, Section 917.1-2, to allow valet parking for restaurant up to 50% of existing, off-street parking spaces. Special Exception as per Article 6, Section 607 to allow bar/lounge open to the. public within the SD-5 District. Variance, pursuant to the City Miami Zoning Ordinance 11000, as amended, ,Article 6, Section 607, for one ground level setback- requested along the interior yard (adjacent to the existing alleyway) from the required 15'-0" down to 6'-611. Variance, pursuant to the City Miami Zoning Ordinance 11000, as amended, Article 6, Section 607, for one ground level setback requested along the north interior yard from the required 15'-0" down to 3". Submitted into the public record n connection with item ,�°Z-L-2 on Walter Foemen ..r ... e . City Clerk Q0`1036 E • • Class 11 Special Permit as per Article 6, Section 607.3.1 for temporary construction fence and covered walkway. Class II Special Permit as per Article 6, Section 607.3.1 for development of new construction within a Special District Class II Special Permit as per Article 9, Section 923.4 providing a total of 12 berths, six (6) berths at 12 feet x 35 feet and six (6) berths reduced to 10 feet x 20 feet where twelve 12 feet x 35 feet are required (four per phase). Class II Special Permit. as per Article 6, Section 607.3.1 for temporary construction trailer. Class H Special Permit to waive certain requirements of the Pedestrian Pathway. Class 11 Special Permit as per Section 908.2 for access from a public street roadway width greater than 25 feet. Class I Special Permit as per Section 915.2 for FAA clearance letter. Class .1 Special Permit as per Article 9, Section 906.6 for pool/outdoor recreation area. Class I Special Permit as per Article 9, Section 917.2.1 to allow valet parking for residential uses. Class I Special. Permit as per Article 9, Section 925.3.8 to allow development/construction/rental signage. Request for the following MUSP conditions to be required at time of shell permit instead of at issuance of foundation permit: a. The requirement to provide a letter of assurance for the Solid Waste Department; and b. The requirement to record in the Public Records a Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions providing that the ownership, operation and maintenance of all common areas and facilities will be by the property owner or a mandatory property owner association; and c. The requirement to record in the Public Records a unity of title or covenant in lieu of unity of title. Submitted into the public rOcOrc 1, in connection with item on /— Walter Foeman City Clerk oa-1036 L r Request for Reservation of Downtown Development of Regional Impact (DRI) credits. a. Park Place LLC. is requesting that with the approval of the MUSP, the City allocate DRI credits for 918 residential units and 22,823 square feet of retail use. Designation as a phased development pursuant to Section 2502 of Ordinance No.11000. y cPhee oning Inspector 11 • • 1 SubM!tted into the public recur in conne tion with item on ( Walter Foeman City Clerk ®— IMP. A4 0 Exhibit " 3" PARK PLACE, L.L.C. Property List Addresses Folio Nos. Lots 1432 Brickell Avenue 01-0209-090-1080 South''/2 Lot 8, Lot 9 1438 Brickell Avenue 01-0209-090-1090 Lot 10, North %2 Lot 11 1440 Brickell Avenue 01-0209-090-1100 South 1/2 Lot 11, Lot 12 1450 Brickell Avenue 01-0209-090-1110 Lot 13, North 1/2 Lot 14 1460 Brickell Avenue 01-0209-090-1120 Part of Lot 14, Lot 15 1485 S. Miami Avenue 01-0209-090-1130 Lot 17, Lot 18 1475-77 S. Miami Avenue 01-0209-090-1140 Lot 19 1465 S. Miami Avenue 01-0209-090-1150 Lot 20, South 1/2 Lot 21 1451-55 S. Miami Avenue 01-0209-090-1160 North V2. Lot 21, Lot 22 1443 S. Miami Avenue 01-0209-090-1170 Lot 23 1435 S. Miami Avenue 01-0209-090-1180 Lot 24, Lot 25 1 SE 15`h Road 01-0209-090-2010 Lot 16-A, Lot 16-B MIAM13/JAMESS/189640/42bs01 !.DOC/4/25/00 Submitted into the public record in connection with item on 1i • Walter Foeman City Clerk • MARY BRICKELL ADDN. PB B-113 BLOCK 99 (L-029) (58 LABELS) LOTS 1 2 RICHARD OCCONNELL TR 1414 BRICKELL AVE % TRANSAL CORP 01-02099-001-010 2121 SW 3 AVE 8TH FL MIAMI FL 33129 LOTS 3 THRU 7 & N112 OF LT 8 THE TAPLIN CO LTD 1428 BRICKELL AVE 1177 KANE CONCOURSE 01-02099-001-030 BAY HARBOR ISL FL 33154 LOT 26 PHOENIX INV CO LE 1421 S MIAMI AVE REM RICHARD O'CONNELL TR 01-02099-001-190 2121 SW 3 AVE 8FL MIAMI FL 33129 NWLY75FT OF LTS 27-28 RICHARD O'CONNELL 1411 S MIAMI AVE % TRANSAL CORP 01-02099-001-200 2121 SW 3 AVE 8FL MIAMI FL 33129 SWLY75FT OF LTS 27-28 RICHARD O'CONNELL 20 SE 14TH ST % TRANSAL CORP 01-02099-001-210 2121 SW 3 AVE 8FL MIAMI FL 33129 BLOCK 100 LOTS 7 THRU 11 & 1OFT ALLEY LYG NWLY & ADJ TIGERVEST NWCR % D & T CLOSED PER R-87-398 % DELIOTTE & TOUCHE LL 1300 BRICKELL AVE 201 E KENNEDY BLVD #700 01-02099-001-360 TAMPA FL 33602 LOTS 12 THRU 15 & 20FT ALLEY LYG BETW PACIFIC NATL BK NA LOTS CLOSED PER R-87-398 1390 BRICKELL AVE 75 SE 14TH ST MIA FL 33131 01-02099-001-330 LOTS 16 & 17 & 10FT ALLEY LYG SELY & ADJ TIGERVEST NV/CR CLOSED PER R-87-398 % SMITH ORTIZ GOMEZ 1333 S MIA AVE 132 MINORCA AVE 01-02099-001-420 C GABLES FL 33134 LTS 18-19 & THAT PART OF LT 20 NOT USED FOR ST TIGERVEST NV/CR & 1 OFT ALLEY LYG SELY & ADJ CLOSED PER R-87-398 % DELOITTE & TOUCHE 1301 S MIAMI AVE 201 E KENNEDY BLVD #700 01-02099-001-440 TAMPA FL 33602 CITY OF MIAMI SOUTH PB B41 BLOCK 95 HELM BANK % CONTROLLER LOT 1 & S50FT OF LOT 4 & ALL OF LOTS 2 & 3 1312 S MIA AVE 1300 S MIA AVE Submitted into the public ® MIA FL 33130 01-02095-001-010 recor,4 In connection With item on i Li &L2 Walt;r Foeman 00-10,016 • CITY OF MIAMI SOUTH PB B-41 BLOCK 95 N100FT LOT 4 LESS N10FT HB&SPC INC 20 SW 13TH ST 1200 BRICKELL AVE #305 01-02095-001-020 MIA FL 33131 LOT 5 LESS N1OFT FOR RAN HELM BANK 30 SW 13TH ST 1200 BRICKELL AVE #310 01-02095-001-030 MIA FL 33131 LOT 6 LESS NI OFT DAVID W SIME 34 SW 13TH ST PO BOX 3108 01-02095-001-040 MIA FL 33245 LOTS 11-12-13 & W100FT OF LOT 14 UNITED NATL BANK 1399 SW 1 ST AVE 1399 SW 1 STAVE 01-02095-001-100 MIA FL 33130 E51 1/2FT OF LOT 14 UNITED NATL BANK 53 SW 14TH ST 1399 SW 1 ST AVE 01-02095-001-120 MIA FL 33130 LOT 15 GLINN RATINER & P A 45 SW 14TH ST 60 SW 13TH ST 01-02095-001-140 MIA FL 33130 LOT 16 DAVID W SIME 37 SW 14TH ST PO BOX 3108 01-02095-001-150 MIA FL 33245 LOT 17 DAVID W SIME 25 SW 14TH ST PO BOX 3108 01'02095-001-160 MIA FL 33245 LOT 18 HELM BANK 15 SW 14TH ST 1200 BRICKELL AVE #310 01-02095-001-170 MIA FL 33131 LOTS 19 & 20 1340 S MIA AVE Submitted i into HB&SPC INC 1200 BRICKELL AVE #305 01-02095-001-171 recur the MIA FL 33131 'n Pob6:firr oonneotio ►telc-( a mon Waitor Foeman 00-10 city cle du • CITY OF MIAMI SOUTH PB B-41 BLOCK 95 LOT 21 HELM BANK 1326 S MIA AVE 1312 S MIA AVE 01-02095-001-160 MIA FL 33130 BLOCK 96 S112 LOT 1 14TH BRICKELL W LTD 1420 S MIA AVE 1177 KANE CONCOURSE 01-02096-001-010 BAY HARBOR ISL FL 33154 N1/2 OF LOT 1 & ALL LOTS 2 THRU 5 14TH BRICKELL LTD 26 SW 14TH ST 1177 KANE CONCOURSE 01-02096-001-040 BAY HARBOR ISL FL 33154 LOT 6 14TH BRICKELL LTD 44 SW 14TH ST 1177 KANE CONCOURSE • 01-02096-001-060 BAY HARBOR ISL FL 33154 W51.5FT OF LOTS 7 & 8 14TH BRICKELL W LTD 1401 SW 1STAVE 1177 KANE CONCOURSE 01-02096-001-070 #201 BAY HARBOR ISL FL 33154 LOTS 9 & 10 14TH BRICKELL W LTD 1429 SW 1ST AVE 1177 KANE CONCOURSE 01-02096-001-071 #201 BAY HARBOR ISL FL 33154 E50FT OF LOTS 8 & 7 14TH BRICKELL W LTD 50 SW 14TH ST 1177 KANE CONCOURSE 01-02096-001-080 #201 BAY HARBOR ISL FL 33154 W50FT OF El OFT OF LOTS 7 & 8 UNITED NATL BANK 54 SW 14TH ST 1399 SW 1 ST AVE 01-02096-001-090 MIA FL 33130 E50FT OF W101.5FT OF LOTS 11 & 12 TOM & M J PENNEKAMP 45 SW 14TH TER 1434 S MIA AVE 01-02096-001-100 MIA FL 33130 W51.5FT OF LOTS 11 & 12 Submitted into TOM & M J PENNEKAMP 65 SW 14TH TER the public 1434 S MIA AVE . 01-02096-001-110 record o item f Z� iH d�oe �trOra�tp>I MIA FL 33130 on Walter F'oeman DiT Clerk 00— • 0 • CITY OF MIAMI SOUTH PB B-41 BLOCK 96 E50FT OF LOTS 11 & 12 & ALL LOT 13 37 SW 14TH TER 01-02096-001-120 LOT 14 21 SW 14TH TER 01-02096-001-130 LOT 15 1438 S MIAMI AVE 01-02096-001-140 LOT 16 1434 S MIAMI AVE 01-02096-001-150 LOT 17 1430 S MIAMI AVE 01-02096-001-160 BLOCK 98 LOTS 1 & 6 1450 S MIA AVE 01-02098-001-010 LOTS 2 & E15FT LOT 3 21 SW 15TH RD 01-02098-001-020 W65FT OF LOT 3 75 SW 15TH RD 01-02098-001-030 W71.5FT OF E86.5FT OF LOT 3 41 SW 15TH RD 01-02098-001-040 LOT 5 1490-92 S MIAMI AVE Submitted into the public 01-02098-001-050 recorA in connection With itemon Walter Foernan City Clerk 14TH BRICKELL W LTD 1177 KANE CONCOURSE #201 BAY HARBOR ISL FL 33154 MARY J PENNEKAMP/TR 6710 S LE JEUNE RD C GABLES FL 33146 MARY J PENNEKAMPJTR 6710 S LE JEUNE RD C GABLES FL 33146 MARY J PENNEKAMP/TR 6710 S LE JEUNE RD C GABLES FL 33146 TOM & M J PENNEKAMP 1430 S MIA AVE MIA FL 33130 HAROLD & S SAWELSON 1450 S MIA AVE MIA FL 33130 N & V GOESEKE J & A CERVERA 1492 S MIA AVE MIA FL 33130 PROVOST & PARTNERS INC 75 SW 15TH RD MIA FL 33129 PHILIP & J SCHRAEDEL ANN S HAFF 41 SW 15TH RD MIA FL 33129 N & V GOESEKE J & A CERVERA 1492 S MIA AVE MIA FL 33130 • El • 0 BRICKELL FLAGLER PB 5-44 BLOCK 55 LOTS 1-2 & 3 1501 S MIA AVE 01-4139-001-0050 LOT 4 1525 S MIA AVE 01-4139-001-0060 LOTS 5 TO 8 1555 S MIA AVE 01-4139-001-0070 LOTS 25 THRU 36 1550 BRICKELL AVE 014139-001-0180 LOTS 37 & 38 1548 BRICKELL AVE 01-4139-001-0250 LOTS 39 & 40 1528 BRICKELL AVE 01-4139-001-0260 LOTS 41 & 42 1500 BRICKELL AVE 01-4139-001-0270 SIMPSON PARK PB 82-70 TRACT A TR A LESS COMM MOST SLY COR TR A PER 82-70 NE 351.6FT TO POB 85 SW 17TH RD 014139-011-0010 HIGHLEYMANS SUB PB 1-184 LOTS 1 & 2 & W1OFT LOT 3 LESS S1 OFT THEREOF FOR R/W 111 SE 14TH ST 01-02105-001-010 FORTE PLAZA PB 96-21 Submitted into the public TRACT IeC04 in Connection y+Jith 1401 BRICKELL AVE it i �'� '^ 01-02105-007-010 on �tL'G.da Walter Foeman City Clerk THOMAS J BAKER 1501 S MIA AVE MIA FL 33129 THOMAS J BAKER 1501 S MIA AVE MIA FL 33129 THOMAS JBAKER 1501 S MIA AVE MIA FL 33129 1550 BRICKELL ASSOC 9100 S DADELAND BLVD MIA FL 33156 LUPETTO INC 200 S BISC BLVD #4815 MIA FL 33131 THOMAS J BAKER 1501 S MIA AVE MIA FL 33129 EVERETT V SUGARBAKER 1500 BRICKELL AVE MIAMI FL 33129 CITY OF MIA DEPT OF P & D DIV ASSET MGT 444 NW 2ND AVE #325 MIA FL 33130 E S PROPERTIES INC 1395 BRICKELL AVE MIA FL 33131 . AMERICAN VENT PROP FUND 255 ALHAMBRA CIR #1100 C GABLES FL 33134 00— U • COSTA BELLA DEVELOPMENT SUB PB 107-14 TRACT A TR A COSTA BELLA CONDO 1450 BRICKELL BAY DR CONDO ASSOC 01-4139-026 1450 BRICKELL BAY DR MIA FL 33131 FORTE PLAZA PB 96-21 TRACT A TR A AMER VENT PROP FUND & 1401 BRICKELL AVE BLUMBERG BRICKELL LTD 01-02105-007-010 255 ALHAMBRA CIR #1100 C GABLES FL 33134 EAST BRICKELL TOWER SUB. PB 117-86 BRICKELL EAST CONDO ASSC TRACT A 151 SE 15TH RD 151 SE 15TH RD MIAMI FL 33129 01-4139-044 TRACT B TR B REPUBLIC INTL BK OF NY 1451 BRICKELL AVE 1451 BRICKELL AVE 01-4139-036-0020 MIAMI FL 33131 POINT VIEW SUB PB 2-93 BLOCK 2 LOT 45 LESS NELY 5FT FOR RNV & N1/2 OF LOT 46 REPUBLIC INTL BK OF NY 1449 BRICKELL AVE 1451 BRICKELL AVE 01-02105-002-530 MIA FL 33131 BRICKELL CHASE PB 153-67 TERREMARK BRICKELL 11 LTD TRACT A 2601 S BAYSHORE DR #1600 1441 BRICKELL AVE MIA FL 33133 01A139-064-0010/01-02105-002-110 GIFFORD & HIGHLEYMAN PB 3-38 DIOCESE OF NEWTON FOR THE PORT OF LTS 1 THRU 5 & PORT OF LT 39 OF PB 5-44 MELKITES IN THE USA INC DESC BEG MOST WLY COR OF LT 39 TH N 52 DEG E 169. 1501 BRICKELL AVE 40FT S 57 DEG E 249.92FT S 32 DEG W 83.45FT N 57 MIAMI FL 33129 DEG W 22 724FT S 52 DEG W 121.773FT N 37 DEG W 129.038FT S 52 DEG W 52.31 FT N 37 DEG W 112.99FT TO POB 1501 BRICKELL AVE 01 A139-002-0011 1 PORT OF LTS 5 THRU 11 & SW75FT OF LT13 & PORT OF THE PALACE CONDO LT 39 & ALL OF LOTS 40 & 41 BILK B BRICKELLS CONDO ASSOC FLAGER PB 5-44 & SUBMERGED LANDS LYDING SELY 1541 BRICKELL AVE OF LOTS 11-39-40 & 41 AS REC OFF REC 11275-1461 MIAMI FL 33129 1541 BRICKELL AVE 01-4139-038 %01-4139-038-0001 ® Submitted into the public recor in connection with item -f y on 1 -16.00 Walter Foeman City Cleric 00-10 6 0 LJ • Owner/Developer Architecture: Landscape Architecture: Civil: PARK PLACE AT BRICKELL MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT 1450 Brickell Avenue Directory of Project Principals Park Place LLC. 848 Brickell Ave. Suite 1010 Miami, FL 33131 Telephone: (305) 371-5254 Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. 2601 South Bayshore Drive Suite 1000 Miami, FL 33133 Telephone: (305) 859-2050 Fax: (305) 860-3700 Willy Bermello Telephone 860-3735 Fax: (305) 860-3700 Willy_Bermello@bamiami.com Tere C. Garcia Telephone (305) 860-3758 Fax: (305) 859-7666 Tere_Garcia@bamiami.com Scott Bakos Telephone: (305) 860-3710 Fax: (305) 859-7666 Scott_Bakos@bamiami.com Elizabeth Newland Telephone: (305) 860-3729 Fax: (305) 859-7666 Elizabeth_ Newland@bamiami.com Oliverio Sanchez Telephone: (305) 860-3755 Fax: (305) 859-9638 Oliverio_Sanchez@bamiami.com Traffic: Jackson M. Ahlstedt P.E . 46 N.W. 94'h Street Miami Shores, FL 33150 Telephone: (305) 754-8695 Fax: (305) 754-8695 Economist: Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. 1 S.E. Third Avenue, Suite 2100 Miami, FL 33131 Telephone: (305) 374-1574 Fax: (305) 372-8161 Darryl Sharpton Dks@abccpa.com Submitted into the publie recor In connscl:ion with item I L-4 on ILL(, -00 Walter Foeman City Clerk 0Q-�3 • Attorneys: Greenberg Traurig P.A. 1221 Brickell Avenue Miami, FL 33131 Adrienne Friesner Pardo, Esq. Telephone: (305) 579-0683 Fax: (305) 961-5683 Pardoa@gtiaw.com Submitted into the public reca in connew teen with item l / o�� ./_�; /G•-�ry Walter Foeman City Cleric 0"� • PARK PLACE AT BRICKELL MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT Project Data Sheet 1. Legal Description:The South '% of Lot 8, and Lots 9 through 15, both inclusive, together with the 20 foot alley lining adjacent thereof; and Lots 17 through 25, both inclusive, Block 99 South, "Amended Map of Brickell's Addition To The Map of Miami, According to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book "B" at Page 113 of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida. And Lots 16A and 16B, "Wilkinson's Subdivision", According to the Plat Thereof, As Recorded in Plat Book 51 at Page 21 of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida, Section 39, Township 54 South Range 41 East. 2. Address: 3. Zoning Classification 4. Lot Area: 5. Density: • 6. Allowable Area: Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 7. 8. 9. Loading Berths Height: 1450 Brickell Avenue City of Miami SD-5 Gross Area 5.06 acres or 220,664 sq. ft. Units/Acre Allowed 500 units/acre Allowed (4.25 x G.L.A.) P.U.D. Bonus (20% G.L.A.) 937,882 s.f. + 187,564 s.f. 1,125,386 s.f. Required 12 loading berths 12 ft. x 35 ft. Net Area 3.6 acres or 157,177 sq. ft. Units/Acre Provided 254 units/acre Provided 1,020,057 s.f. Provided 6 loading berths 12 ft. x 35 ft. 6 loading berths 10 ft. x 20 ft. Allowed Provided Unlimited Phase One 356 ft. 4 in. Phase Two 420 ft. 8 in. Phase Three 463 ft. 10 in. Building Footprint: Allowed N/A Submitted into the public recor-5 jn connection=im item _L onC� Walter Foeman City Clerk Provided 117,174 s.f. il u 00—lou • • • • • Project Data Sheet (Cont.) 10. Number of Parking Spaces: Required 941 minimum Handicapped spaces Required 19 spaces 11. Open Space: 12. Setbacks: Brickell Avenue (Front) S. Miami Ave. (Side) SE 15 Rd. (Side) Interior Yard (North) Interior Yard (East) Interior Yard (South) Upper Level - Interior Yard (North) Upper Level - Interior Yard (East) Required 30,099 s.f. 15 % G.L.A. Required 30 ft. 15 ft. 15 ft. 15 ft. 15 ft. 15 ft. Required 1:6 slope To a max. of 40' Required 1:6 slope To a max. of 40' Provided 1,374 spaces Provided 31 spaces Provided 107,277 s.f. 48% G.L.A. Provided 30 ft. 15 ft. 15 ft. 3 ft: 6 ft. 6 in. 15 ft. 3 ft. 6 ft. 6 in. Submitted into the public recoin connection with item (L on Walter Foeman City Clerk 00-1 Site Plan f9 ubmitted into the public ecor in connection with Item /1�/ on Walter Foerr an City CI rk 004036 • • PARK PLACE AT BRICKELL MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT Article II. Project Description A. Zoning Ordinance No. 11000 1. Section 1304.2.1 Application Forms; Supplementary Materials 2. Section 1702.2.1 General Report 3. Section 1702.2.2 Major Use Special Permit Concept Plan " 4. Section 1702.2.3 Development Impact Study Submitted into the public ree®r in connection with item l .l on Walter Foeman City Clerk Park Place At Brickell Major Use Special Permit Zoning Ordinance no. 11000 Submitted into the Public reco LL onnection with item-on1/ I r 1.. Section 1304.1.1 Application forms; supplementary materials Walter Foeman City CleFk (a) Statements of ownership and control of the proposed development of activity. The Disclosure of Ownership and Ownership Affidavit are provided in Article I. (b) Statement describing in detail the character and intended use of the development or activity. Park Place at Brickell is a dynamic mixed use phased development providing a grand total of 918 units, 22,823 square feet of ground retail and 1,374 parking spaces. The project will consist of three (3) phases. Together, the three (3) phases will create a coherent single project, although each phase will also have the ability to function independently as well. Phase One consists of 286 residential units, 4,232 square feet of ground floor retail and 438 parking spaces. Phase Two consists of 308 residential units, 11,173 square feet of ground floor retail and 514 parking spaces. Phase Three consists of 324 residential units, 7,418 square feet of retail and 422 parking spaces. The project is located on Brickell Avenue in the transition zone between the financial and high rise residential districts. The property abuts three streets: Brickell Avenue to the east, South Miami Avenue to the west, and SE 1511 Road to the south. The north side of the property is adjacent to other interior properties. The property consists of a net lot area of 157,177 square feet or 3.608 acres. The gross lot area is 220,664 square feet or 5.066 acres. The property is located within the SD-5 Zoning District. The property is proximate to the major employment centers of downtown Miami, the City of Coral Gables, and the City of Miami Beach. Its proximity and quick access to transportation networks, including transit, will allow residents to quickly commute to employment centers within the region. A recent study commissioned by the Downtown Development Authority indicates that the potential demand for rental housing in Downtown Miami and the Brickell area is strong. Potential demand for the entire downtown area is estimated at 5,421 units for the period between 1997 and 2005. The Brickell area accounts for approximately 34% of this demand. Recent studies have found that renters in the Brickell area are looking for projects that contain amenities such as security, parking garages, noteworthy architecture, and recreational facilities that are affordable to young professionals. Park Place at Brickell, when completed, will consist of three towers of varying heights: Phase One, with 33 floors at 3764", containing 256 residential units; Phase Two, with 39 floors at 420'-8", • containing 328 residential units, and; Phase Three, with 41 floors at 463'-10", containing 334 residential units. All three Towers rise above the ground floor, seven stories of parking, and a recreation deck. Together, the base and three towers will create a "stepping" effect, progressing 0-16 0 10 from Phase One at a total of 33 stories, Phase Two at 39 stories, and Phase Three at 41 stories. The parking garage for Phase Two, which is located on floors two (2) through eight (8), is buffered from Brickell Avenue by 42 residential units, a feature that also creates an architecturally unique facade along one of Miami's signature thoroughfares. The ground level incorporates retail uses such as restaurants, cafes, convenience stores and specialty boutiques that will cater to residents of Park Place and the surrounding neighborhood. This project will provide a more affordable housing alternative for moderate -income professionals in the Brickell area, a market that is presently underserved. The supply of apartments in this area has recently increased, although for the most part these developments cater to higher income professionals, leaving a market void that Park Place will fill. The retail area is primarily oriented to Brickell Avenue and South Miami Avenue. The remaining frontage along these streets and S.E. 15'h Road consists of the tower lobbies, drop-off and pick-up areas, and vehicular entrance and exits to and from the parking garages. There is a pedestrian entrance lobby on the north corner of Brickell Avenue which serves both the 42 units associated with the parking garage levels, and that serves as a "Brickell Entrance" for all three towers with direct tenant access to the 91h level recreational deck. The vehicular parking garage entrances and exits for each tower function independently from the drop-off and pick-up areas for each tower lobby. This prevents parking garage traffic from interfering with drop-off or pick-up traffic, thus creating a more efficient vehicular transportation flow. The Phase One and Two parking garages are accessible from South Miami Avenue, while Phase Three is accessible from S.E. 151h Road. These locations prevent vehicular traffic associated with the parking garages from directly accessing Brickell Avenue. Each lobby drop-off and pick-up area includes a covered area to provide shelter during inclement weather. All entrance drives feature specialty concrete patterns and provide careful attention to detail to provide a rich experience for both the tenant and visitor. Beyond the building's perimeter, the sidewalk area will be lined with a combination of both shade and palm trees, specialty pavers, landscape furniture and sculpture to provide a true urban streetscape experience. All parking garages have security -controlled gates with card key access for tenants and passes for guests, and dedicated elevators providing access to the lobbies. A security desk in the lobby separates these elevators from tower elevator banks. Additionally, all units feature telephone entry and intrusion alarm systems. The seven level parking garages provide a total of 1,374 parking spaces, which supports the residential and retail component of the development. The ninth floor houses the private recreational deck, which consists of both indoor and outdoor. amenities. The recreational deck is designed to provide three separate functional decks for each phase, or a single "super -recreational deck" that all three phases can share. The ground floor of the parking garages house utility facilities such as the Florida Power & Light transformer vault, and the main electrical, mechanical, trash, and telephone rooms. These spaces are centrally located within the ground floor, and are buffered from adjacent streets by retail, restaurants, lobbies and garage entrances. These areas are accessible from the existing alleyway linking 14th Street and Brickell Avenue. Drawings showing the architectural character of the project (elevation and renderings), and the location of intended uses on the site plan are included under Tab 6 of the supporting documents. Submitted ingi t;&e public reco in , connection with item on C --«� Walter Foeman a City Clerk • �J r� • • (c) General location map, showing relation of the site or activity for which special permit is sought to major streets, schools, existing utilities, shopping areas, important physical features in and adjoining the project or activity and the like. The following exhibits are included with the Major Use Special Permit Application: (1) Aerial: Aerial photograph of the surrounding area indicating the project site. (2) Area Context Map/Site Aerial: Map of the project area indicating buildings that surround the site. (3) Location Map: Map of the surrounding street system indicating the project location. (d) A site plan containing the title of the project and the names of the project planner and developer, date, and north arrow and, based on an exact survey of the property drawn to a scale of sufficient size to show. The project's developer is Park Place, LLC. The architects, planners and engineers are Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. The general information requested is shown under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. Several drawings include the following information: (1) Boundaries of the project, any existing streets, buildings, watercourses, easements and section lines. The boundaries and the location of existing streets and easements are shown on the Boundary Survey located under Tab 5 of the Supporting Documents. (2) Exact location of all buildings and structures. The exact location of all existing buildings located on the property is shown on the Boundary Survey under Tab 5. The location of the buildings to be constructed is shown under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (3) Access and traffic flow and how vehicular traffic will be separated from pedestrian and other types of traffic. The vehicular parking garage entrances and exits for each tower function independently from the drop-off and pick-up areas for each tower lobby. This prevents parking garage traffic from interfering with drop-off or pick-up traffic, creating a more efficient vehicular transportation flow. The Phase One and Two parking garage is accessible from South Miami Avenue, while Phase Three is accessible from SE 151h Road. These locations prevent vehicular traffic associated with the parking garages from directly accessing Brickell Avenue. Each lobby drop-off and pick-up area includes a covered area to provide shelter during inclement weather. All entrance drives feature specialty concrete patterns and a careful attention to detail to provide a rich experience for both the tenant and visitor. Beyond the building's perimeter, the existing sidewalk area is lined with a combination of both shade and palm trees, specialty pavers, landscape furniture and sculpture to provide a true urban streetscape experience. A detailed analysis of the site access and traffic flow is provided in the Traffic Impact Analysis located under Tab 2 of the Supporting Documents. Submitted into the public recor in connection with item !L on .4L—_/6 Walter Foeman 00-1 (4) Off street parking and off street loading areas. The off street parking structures are located on the second to eighth floors of the buildings. It contains seven (7) levels of parking with 1,374 parking spaces including 31 handicapped spaces. The plans for the off street parking facility are provided under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. The -Zoning Ordinance requires four (4)-loading bays of 12 ft. x 35 ft for each phase. A request for a Class II permit is included to be able to provide six (6) bays at 12 ft. X 35 ft and a reduction of six (6) bays at 10 ft. X 20 ft. The ground floor of the parking garage houses utility facilities such as the Florida Power & Light transformer vault, and the main electrical, mechanical, trash, and telephone rooms. These spaces are centrally located within the ground floor, and are buffered from adjacent streets by retail, restaurants, lobbies and garage entrances. These areas are accessible from the existing alleyway linking 14th Street and Brickell Avenue. Service areas are shown under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (5) Recreational facilities locations. At the ninth floor of the building is a recreation deck for the development including indoor and outdoor amenities. The indoor recreational facilities include men's and women's exercise and aerobic rooms overlooking the open air recreation terrace. There is a 50-foot lap pool and a water feature in the center of the terrace with Royal Palms framing the pool and the sitting area. There is a continuous trellis encircling the open-air deck. There are 4 corner cabanas with BBQ facilities. These cabanas are covered. The facilities are for the use of the residents and are accessed from each of the elevator lobbies and the Brickell Avenue lobby. The recreation terrace is shown under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (6) Screens and buffers. An elegant streetscape bringing pedestrians into the neighborhood and the project is conceived for Brickell Avenue, S. Miami Avenue, and SE 15 Road. The plaza at S. Miami Avenue reacts to Simpson Park across the street, and is depressed and lined with shade trees and shrubs to create a "pedestrian hideaway". The plaza at Brickell Avenue is an open "urban" plaza responding to Brickell Avenue and its "metropolitan experience". The landscaping and buffer area details are under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (7) Refuse collections areas. Waste collection will be provided by a containerized compactor system located within the service area in each residential tower. In addition, each floor of all three (3) towers will have chutes servicing trash and recycling, and each tower will have a ground floor self-contained trash compactor unit and a cardboard recycling bin. These facilities are shown under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. • Submitted into the public record in connection with item on LL6-'9J- Walter Foeman 4 City Clerk, 00-036 ® (8) Access to utilities and points of utility hookups. Access and connections to site utilities are discussed in the Site Utility Study located under Tab 3 of the Supporting Documents. (e) Tabulations of total gross acreage in the project and the percentages thereof proposed to be devoted to: (1) The various permitted uses. The various permitted uses include residential, parking, retail and office. A detailed list of the uses included in the project is as follows: Residential building Parking garage Recreational Deck Retail Open area, plazas and exterior courts (2) Ground coverage by structures. Ground coverage by the structures is 53% of the total gross lot area. (f) Tabulation showing the following: (1) The derivation of numbers of off street parking and off street loading spaces shown in (d) above. The total number of off street parking spaces provided is 1,374 spaces. Derivation of the numbers of off street parking is shown under Project Criteria, located under Tab 6. (2) Total project density in dwelling units per acre. Total project density is 254 units per acre where 500 units per acre is permitted. (g) If common facilities (such as recreation areas of structures, private streets, common open space, etc.) are to be provided for the development, statements as to how such common facilities are to be provided and permanently maintained. All common facilities provided will be maintained by the Owner. (h) Storm drainage and sanitary sewerage plans. Storm drainage, water distribution, waste water and solid waste generation provisions are discussed in the Site Utility Study located under Tab 3 of the Supporting Documents. (1) Architectural definitions for buildings in the development; exact number of dwelling units, sizes 0 and types, together with typical floor plans of each type. Submitted into the public r@cor m connection with item on / j f Walter Foeman 5 City Cleric U U, Detailed information and breakdown of square footage of all uses are found under Project Criteria included under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. Typical floor plans for the residential • units as well as all elevations and sections are located under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (j) Plans for signs, if any. The project will include "signature" signs for the residential buildings as well as for the retail area. A package of uniform design guidelines will be submitted to ensure that signs are uniformly designed. (k) Landscaping plan, including types, sizes and locations of vegetation and decorative shrubbery, and showing provisions for irrigation and future maintenance. The landscape plans are found under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (1) Plans for recreation facilities, if any, including location and general description of building for such use. A private recreation deck for the development, including indoor and outdoor amenities, is located at the ninth floor of the building. The indoor recreational facilities include men's and women's exercise and aerobic rooms overlooking the open air recreation terrace. There is a 50-foot lap pool and a water feature in the center of the terrace with Royal Palms framing the pool and the sitting area. There is a continuous trellis encircling the open-air deck. There are 4 corner cabanas with BBQ facilities. These cabanas are covered. 40 The facilities are for the use of the residents and are accessed from the elevators through a ninth floor lobby. The recreation terrace is shown under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (m) Such additional data, maps, plans, or statements as may be required for the particular use or activity involved. The details of the spaces and calculations used to compute the Floor Area Ratio (FAR) are shown on the FAR plans under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. The drawings covering the roof and mechanical, electrical and plumbing rooms are included under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (n) Such additional data as the Applicant may believe is pertinent to the proper consideration of the site and development plan. Sections and elevations depicting the architectural character of the building as well as floor plans showing the parking garage, the service areas and the retail and residential units are located under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. 2. Section 1702.2.1 General Report (1) Property ownership or ownership and beneficial interest within the boundaries of the area proposed for Major Use Special Permit. Statement of Ownership and beneficial interest within the boundaries of the area proposed for Major Use Special Permit is provided in Article I. Submitted into the public recor%},in connection with (2) The nature of the unified interest or control. item f on G� Walter Foeman 6 Cify Clerk U0- 26 r1 The nature of unified interest or control is indicated in Article I. (3) Survey of the proposed area showing property lines and ownership. A copy of the Boundary Survey is included under Tab 5 of the Supporting Documents. (4) Map of existing features, including streets, alleys, easements, utilities' lines, existing land use, general topography and physical features. The existing site features and utility lines are shown on the Boundary Survey of the property located under Tab 5. The site features and the utilities are also described in the Site Utility Study, located under Tab 3 of the Supporting Documents. (5) Materials to demonstrate the relationship of the elements listed in (4) preceding to surrounding area characteristics. The Drawings submitted with this Application are located under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (6) . Existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan designations for the area on and around the lands proposed for Major Use Special Permit. The existing zoning designation for the property pursuant to City of Miami Ordinance No. 11000, is SD-5 (Brickell Area Residential -Office District). Page 37 of the Zoning Atlas Map is located in Article I, and indicates the existing and surrounding zoning. The comprehensive plan future land use designation for the property is Restricted Commercial. The zoning and the comprehensive plan designation are consistent with one another. 3. Section 1702.2.2 Major Use Special Permit Concept Plan. (a) Relationships of the concept plan to surrounding, existing and proposed future uses, activities, systems, and facilities (transportation, recreation, view corridors, pedestrian systems, service systems and similar uses). Article II contains a written narrative of this project outlining proposed uses, activities and architectural character. This narrative also contains descriptions of the project's relationship to traffic, pedestrian movements, and transportation access. Building elevations and sections showing the proposed materials, vertical profile and height, and orientation to streets is included in the Drawings submitted with this Application. The list of Drawings submitted is found under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (b) Existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan principles and designations. This project conforms to the SD-5 (Brickell Area Residential -Office District) zoning district designated for this property. The comprehensive plan future land use designation conforms to the land use designation currently in effect for this property. 4. Section 1702.2.3 Developmental Impact Study Submitted into the public reco in connection with item=� on 7 0 l" — I U ;@er Foeman City Clerk (a) ' A traffic analysis shall be submitted for an area within approximately 1/4-mile of the site, or JO an area including the major intersections to be impacted by the site, whichever is larger. The Traffic Impact Analysis is included under Tab 2 of the Supporting Documents. (b) Economic impact data shall be provided, including estimates for construction costs, construction employment and permanent employment and shall demonstrate that the proposed development is favorable to the economy, public services, environment and housing supply of the City. The Economic Impact Study is included' under Tab 4 of the Supporting Documents. (c) A housing impact assessment. There will be 918 residential units within the development. The average rental price will range from $1,100 to $ 2,000 per month. (d) A description of proposed energy conservation measures shall be provided, including only those measures that are proposed in addition to the minimum requirements in State Energy Code. Architecturally, the building envelope will be comprised of insulated walls and roof. Lightly tinted glass will be used throughout the building. Electrically, all exterior and landscape lighting will be controlled by means of time clocks and photocell switches. Energy saving lamps, ballasts and fixtures are being considered at cores and public spaces. (e) Historic Buildings There are no existing historic structures located on the property. (f) Environmental Impacts The property is located within an archaeological preservation district. Submitted, into the public record in connection with item i9on : / Walter Foeman City Clerk 8 Q0-1Ua �J • PARK PLACE AT BRICKELL MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT 1010 South Miami Avenue Article III. Supporting Documents Tab 1 Minority Construction Employment Plan Tab 2 Traffic Impact Analysis Tab 3 Site Utility Study Tab 4 Economic Impact Study Tab 5 Survey of Property Tab 6 Drawings • Submitted into the Pkiblic record in connection with Item on Walter Foeman City Clerk 00-1036 • r1 L-J PARK PLACE AT BRICKELL MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT MINORITY CONSTRUCTION EMPLOYMENT PLAN Submitted into the pjr)iic, recor �in Connection item r" - L-L on %� �a� June 7, 2000 Walter Foeman ® City Clerk I L � • BERMELLO, A)AMIL & PARTNERS, INC. Architects, Engineers, Planning, Interior Design & Landscape Architecture I �J MIAMI-DADE COUNTY AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PLAN AUGUST 1999 • Submitted into the public IeCW4 in connection, yr q h item fl / on-4L—L4-CX Walter Foeman City Clerk 010 3 6 •. • 0 2601 South Bayshore Drive Suite 1000 Miami Florida USA 33133 Telephone: (305) 859-2050 Fax: (305) 859-9638 Submitted into the put)iic recor an connection with _Item t&_E2_1 on a --W Walter 1=oeman x... City Clerk July 15, 1999 MEMORANDUM TO: All Employees FROM: Willy A. Bermello RE: AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PLAN AS OF AUGUST 1, 1999 EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY POLICY STATEMENT: It is the policy of BERMELLO, AJAMIL & PARTNERS, INC. to base employment on merit, • qualifications and competency and that its personnel practices will not be influenced by an applicant's or employee's race, color, place of birth, religion, national origin, sex, age, marital status, veteran or handicapped status. One of the management duties of all principals at BERMELLO, AJAMIL & PARTNERS, INC. is to ensure that the following personnel practices are being satisfied: 1. Take every necessary affirmative action to attract and retain qualified employees. 2. Maintain equitable principles in the recruitment, hiring, training, compensation and promotion of employees. 3. Monitor and review personnel practices to guarantee that equal opportunities are being provided to all employees. BERMELLO, AJAMIL & PARTNERS, INC. is committed to take affirmative action and aggressively pursue activities that wil I serve to enhance our total participation, in good faith, and enable qualified employees and applicants the opportunities available throughout this organization. 1. Declaration of Policy Regarding affirmative action. In accordance with Miami Dade Resolution No. 1049-93, Ordinance 82-37, and Ordinance No. 98-30 amending Section 2-10.4 (5) (d) and Section 2-8.1.5 respectively, of the Miami Dade County Code, BERMELLO, AJAMIL & PARTNERS, INC. affirms its commitment to submittal of an Affirmative Action Plan for the purpose of maintaining equal employment and promotional opportunity for the minority workforce in Miami Dade County by programmatic activities as well as subcontracting. J Page 2 Affirmative Action Memo IsubMitted into the pubife reco in connection with _Item UL—_UL' on Walter Foeman City Clerk 2. B&A's Affirmative Action Plan Officer BERMELLO, A)AMIL & PARTNERS, INC. has assigned Mr. Nelson C. Martinez, Partner/ in charge of Personnel, as the Affirmative Action Director to monitor all activities of this program. 3. Availability and location of Affirmative Action Plan The affirmative action plan is distributed as a memorandum to all employees on an annual basis. We ask that employees maintain this memorandum for their records. In addition, this plan is located in the employee manual within the Human Resources Department. 4. Procedures to Publicize Plan Internally a. The Affirmative action plan is distributed on a annual basis in the form of a memorandum. Employees are asked to maintain the plan in their personal file for future reference. b. A copy of the plan is also kept with the staff manual in the Human Resources Department. 5. Procedures to Publicize Plan Externally a. All employment advertising will include a statement 'of Equal Employment . Opportunity. In addition, advertising will utilize Hispanic and Black media (e.g. Miami Times). b. With respect to use of part-time college students, efforts have been made to include minority, women and African -American, candidates in the interview/hiring process (e.g. Florida Memorial College and other Black colleges). We have also printed up two brochures to distribute to colleges indicating our commitment to hire minorities. Bermello, Ajamil & Partners' Affirmative Action Plan, as approved by Miami Dade County, and established by the principals of the firm, is revised as the minimum effort that the firm will expend in promoting the use of disadvantaged and minority business in this community, and providing economic opportunities. The firm is and will continue to exceed the plan goals and objectives. The Affirmative Action Plan is based on the principals' belief that our Miami Dade County community can only improve if the lifestyles of every single disadvantaged group in the community is advanced. A commitment exists from our firm that as it grows and matures, special emphasis will be sought to find and provide opportunities for professional, managerial and partnership opportunities for especially Black minorities. The firm has made positive strides in this endeavor. As one of South Florida's mostdiversified arch itectural/engineeringfirms, B&A has an ethnic and gender balance in the workforce that is a model for the industry; 54.1 % of its workforce is Hispanic, 8.8% is African -American, and 35.5% is female, with many in senior positions. In addition, the partners of the firm "practice what they preach" by participating in community activities. which are designed to promote the above stated objectives. Mr. Bermello is currently Chairman of the City of Miami's Urban Development Review Board. He was elected Chairman of The Latin Builders Association in 1997. Mr. Bermello served as Chairman of the Florida Page 3 Affirmative Action Memo Commission on Human Relations, State of Florida, where in 1997 he received the Civil Rights. Advocacy Award for his participation in the Florida.Civil Rights Act, while Mr. Ajami) has been elected to Black Economic Development Team Miami of the Beacon Council. The firm continues to support functions such as the Miami Negro College Fund and the Cuban American National Foundation. One of the most important things that the firm has been doing is actively seeking women and African -American professionals in the fields of expertise that the firm is practicing. Sincerely, Willy A. Berme o, AIA, AICP President • • Submitted into the rec®rA in connection wan item /N on / i—! C - oa Walter Foeman City Clerk • :f C:), p J.. TOTAL EMPLOYEES 103 BERMELLO, A►AMIL & PARTNERS, INC. Na of Firm Signature of Authorized Representative STATISTICAL WORKFORCE ANALYSIS WORK FORCE COMPOSITION (ETHNICITY AND GENDER) ANGLO BLACK HISPANIC OTHER COMBINED TOTALS MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE ANGLO BLACK HISP OTHER JOB CATEGORY 7 6.8% 1 0.97% 2 1.96% 8 7.8% Principals and Managers 1 0.97% 1 0.97 Registered Professionals (Not. Incl. above) 4 3.9% 1 0.97% -- -- 4 3.9% 4 3.9% 1 0.97% -- 5 4.9% '- 8 7.8% 1 0.97% Other Professionals 1 .97% 2 1.96% 1 0.97% 3 2.9% 2 1.96% 8 7.8% -- -- 3 2.9% 4 3.9% 10 9.7% -- Para Professionals 11 10.7 % 2 1.96% 2 1.96% 1 0.97% 19 18.4% 10 9.7% -- -- 13 12.6% 3 2.9% 29 28% -- Office and Clerical 4 3.9% 1 .97% 1 0.97% 1 0.97% 9 8.7% - 1 0.97% 4 3.9% 2 1.96% 10 9.7% 1 0.97% Others TOTAL BREAKDOWN 17 16.5% 10 9.71% 4 3.9% 5 4.85% 33 32% 32 31.1% 1 .097% 1 0.97% 27 26.2% 9 8.8% 65 63% 2 �W—\o _ Luis Ajamil Executive Vice President Name of Principal ::3 o CD n ` =r oT = c� lu_y 22, 1997 n 3 Cr Date CD = ci • E PROGRAMMATIC ACTIVITIES AND GOALS`Submitted into the public record in connection with item — on 1. RECRUITMENT/ADVERTISING Walter Foeman City Clerk All employment advertising will include a statement of Equal Employment Opportunity. In addition, advertising will utilize Hispanic and Black media (e.g. Miami Times). With respect to use of part-time college students, efforts have been made to include minority, women and African -American, candidates in the interview/hiring process (e.g. Florida Memorial College and other Black colleges). We have also printed up two brochures to distribute to colleges indicating our commitment to hire minorities. 2. HIRING PROCEDURES All positions will be filled without regard to race, color, religion, sex or national origin. BERMELLO, AJAMIL & PARTNERS, INC. is dedicated to a policy of equal employment opportunities for minorities. PROMOTION PROCEDURES BERMELLO, AJAMIL & PARTNERS, INC. maintains equitable principals in the promotion of employees as stated in the Affirmative Action Plan. The Affirmative Action Plan is based on the principals' belief that our Dade County community can i only improve if the lifestyles of every single disadvantaged group in the community is advanced. A commitment exists from our firm that as it grows and matures, special emphasis will be sought to find and provide opportunities for professional, managerial and partnership opportunities for all minorities. The firm has made positive strides in this endeavor. As one of South Florida's most diversified architectural/engineering firms, B&A has an ethnic and gender balance in the workforce that is a model for the industry:54.1 % of its workforce is Hispanic, 8.8% is African -American, and 35.5% is female with many in senior positions. During the past year, two women were named Partner in the firm; one woman was promoted to Senior Associate; and two women were promoted to the Associate level. Also, an African American women was promoted to a Director position with the firm and an African -American male was hired into Director position. We continually monitor and review personnel practices to guarantee that equal opportunities are being provided to all employees, regardless of race, color, place of birth, religion, national origin, sex, age, marital status, veteran and handicapped status. 4. TRAINING BERMELLO, AJAMIL & PARTNERS, INC. provides training and continuing education opportunities to all of its employees regardless of their race, color, religion, sex or national origin. 5. PUBLICITY B&A has developed and printed an Affirmative Action brochure which we are sending to colleges throughout the country to show our commitment to hiring of minorities. In all external publicity materials, an Affirmative Action statement will be included with the printed material. In addition, where pictures are used, minorities will be included. B E R M E L L 0 AJAMIL & PARTNERS INC 00-101316 • C7 a 6. PROCUREMENT POLICIES The entity of BERMELLO, AJAMIL & PARTNERS, INC., earns gross revenue in excess of $5 million. annually. The firm has substational workforces and utilizes Minority and Women -owned firms for printing, photography, public relations, advertising, promotion, and professional consultant services. We will continue to solicit minority firms to bid on contracts for services. (See attached listing) Submitted into the public reco in connection with 'tem on Walter Foeman City Clerk 8 E R M E L L 0 - A J A M I L & P A R T N E R S I N C 00-10906 Minority Vendors (Partial List) Advanti & Associates (Printing) * Williams, Russell & Johnson* Contact: Glenn Diston Contact: Tyrone Williams 5624 NW 79th Ave. 3900 NW 79 h Street, Suite 501 Miami, FL 33166 Miami, FL 33166 477-6010 599-1666 RC Enterprises* Metropolitan Printing ** Contact: Rick Riley Contact: Hector Infante 3399 N.W. 72nd Ave. Ft. Lauderdale, FL Miami, FL 33122 954/340-7585 471-9826 PFAFFCO * Original Impressions ** Kimberly Pfaff Contact: Luis Rodriguez 759 N.W. 24th Street 12900 S.W. 89th Court Miami, FL 33127 Miami, FL 33176 635-0986 233-1322 Bugdal Group, Inc.*** Pat McNeese Environmental*** Contact: Contact: Pat McNeese . 7308 SW 48 Street Miami, FL 33155 Key West, FL 33054 665-6686 305/453-5362 Curtis, Rogers Design Studio*** )a -Mar Creations, Inc. *** Contact: Aida Curtis Toner Cartridge Specialists 2982 Grand Avenue, #301 3178 Pembroke Road Coconut Grove, FL 33131 Hallandale, FL 33009 442-1774 961-3233 Nancy Robinson Watson *** Judson & Partners* Photographer Contact: Clyde Judson 609 Ocean Drive #7-H 2730 SW 3`d Avenue, #203 Key Biscayne, FL 33149 Miami, FL 33129 361-9182 858-7070 * Black ** Hispanic *** Female h Si�%�i3BtttC:o, into 11he, nEtbliC recor in connection with item; a`z_ on 2L1C_-,c0 Walter Foeman City Clerk B E R M E L L 0 A J A M I L & P A R T N E R S I N C 0 UTILIZATION OF LOCAL MINORITY BUSINESSES ON MIAMI DADE COUNTY WORK Firm Name: BERMELLO, AJAMIL & PARTNERS, INC. Amounts Paid to k1inorityFirms Description of Date Contract Authorized Expiration Minority 01/1997-12/1997 01/1998 - 01/1999 - Present Contract Awarded Amount Work Date Firm Type Minority Firm Name 12/1998 Award Paid Award Paid Award Paid DCAD - 7/7/92 $5.8 Mechanical 7/99 Hispanic SDM Consulting _ $160,171 _ $210,168 _ $74,827 Concourse A million & Electrical Structural Hispanic Donnell, DuQuesne & _ $68,309 _ $104,437 _ 525,292 Albaisa FIU Minor Project 6/96 varies Mechanical and Electrical 11/99 Hispanic H ufsey-N icol aides- Garcia -Suarez _ 25% _ 25% _ 25% Structural Eng. Hispanic Donnell, DuQuesne & _ 15% _ 15% _ 15% Albaisa Miami Beach 7/97 $546K Surveying 12/98 Woman Weidener Surveying — — — $13,192 - $11,660 Beautification Landscaping Woman Curtis & Rogers _ $9,210 _ $4,732 _ $13,115 Venetian 1/97 $2.8 Surveying 9/99 Woman Weidener Surveying — $5,408 _ $114,877 - $33,803 Causeway million Public Relations Hispanic David Fierro _ _ _ $28,264 _ Underwater Native Infrastructures _ $23,025 _ $23,904 Inspectors American AA - First Class / Consular 5/98 $21 OK Mechanical & Electrical 3/99 Hispanic H ufsey-N icol aides- Garcia -Suarez _ _ _ $30,900 Structural Hispanic Donnell, DuQusne & $6,0 Lounge Albaisa _ _ _ University of Miami School of 3/98 $204,000 Structural continuous Hispanic Donnell, DuQuesne & Albaisa _ _ _ $5,770 _ $1,330 Business Doral Country Club- Marriott 2/99 $1.32 million Mechanical& Electrical 2/07 Hispanic Hufsey-Nicolaides- Garcia -Suarez _ _ $121,400 $12,300 Structural Hispanic Donnell, DuQuesne & _ _ _ _ $177,000 -0- Arch Submitted into the public record in connection with itemUTILIZATION OF LOCAL MINORITY BUSINES'� ° Walter Foemaneman City Cleric BERMELLO, A)AMIL & PARTNERS, INC. endeavors to utilize Minority/Women-owned firms for printing, photography, public relations, advertising and promotion, and will continue to solicit minority firms to bid on contracts for services. (See attached Fisting) The following lists some of our contributions to minority entities: • 8.8% Of B&A'S Staff is Black • B&A has contributed the following Pro -Bono work: • Overtown Advisory Board - Computerized presentation of Overtown Redevelopment Plan (10 shows) • Space Planning for City of Miami's N.E.T. office in Overtown • Douglas Apartments District Task Force - Computerized presentation • Offered mentoring and proposal coordination to Architectural Design Consortium (a Black architecture company) for. the African -American Library project. Support included: guidance with structure/composition of the team • - guidance regarding doing associated homework; visiting site and personnel to determine important issues to address - format and content of the initial submittal - support/training the office person producing the submittal; frequent phone conversations - review of the submittal with suggestions for edit; actual edit of cover letter - guidance/support of technical submittal; suggestions on formatting; what/how to request info from subs; actual hands-on production and editing support - guidance on presentation content and personal presentation skills - designed and produced the multimedia presentation with our personnel and eq u i,p ment - provided personnel and equipment on site for multimedia presentation • B&A Advertises in the Miami Times e B&A Parbcipates in the SER-JOBS Program for On -The -lob Training of Minorities in entry-level positions • B&A Recruits Annually at Florida A&M's College of Architecture B E R M E L L 0 - A J A M l L & P A R T N E R S I 0 �J • Professional Consultants - Over the years, B&A has retained the services of the following Black professionals: Black Professional Consultants George Knox, Attorney Darryl Sharpton, CPA PAWA Complex Unison Consulting PEER Consultants Architectural Design Consortium Hammond & Associates Nifah & Partners, Inc. Hispanic Professional Consultants Louis Aguirre & Associates H ufesy-N icolaides-Garcia-Suarez Rafeal Pena Women -Owned Professional Consultants Alina T. Ferrer Susan Holland Associates Weidener Surveying & Mapping Judson & Partners Jimmie Allen Williams Russell Johnson Dickey Consultants Civil-Cadd, Inc. Joseph Middlebrooks & Assoc. JJ Sosa & Associates Donnell, DuQuesne & Albaisa Manuel Vera & Associates Fraga Engineers San Martin & Associates • Willy A. Bermello Endowed Teaching Chair Miami Dade Community College/Black or Hispanic Teacher Fine Arts Endowment . $45,000.00 • Commissioner, Florida Human Relations Commission Willy A. Bermello served (7) years as Commissioner, Florida Human Relations Commission, elected Chairman in 1992 and awarded the 1992 Civil Rights Award. • From 1997 to present, B&A has contributed to the following civic organizations / entities: Cuban American National Foundation Latin Builders Association, Chairman City of Miami Urban Development Review Board Civil Rights Advocacy Group Children's Psychiatric Center - Christmas Gift Foundation March of Dimes Camillus House Miami -Dade Christian Coalition Boys & Girls Club Multiple Sclerosis Foundation United Way of Miami Dade County Hospice NE Hadlow Anti -Defamation League Submitted into the public recur in connection with item on L/ Walter Foeman City Clerk • In 1999, B&A promoted one African -American to a Director position. • In 1999, BSA promoted two women to the Associate level; two women to Senior Associate positions; and two women to the Partner level. B E R M E L L 0 A J A M I L & P A R T N E R S I N0C `y " 3 • GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE It is the Firm's desire to maintain the pleasant relationship that has always existed between all members of the staff, striving to make 8&A a worthwhile place of employment. Our Employee Personnel Manual states that if any misunderstanding arises, or any complaints about the condition of employment, wage rate, promotions, or any other problems should be discussed immediately with Nelson C. Martinez, Personnel Director, located on the 1 Oth floor, or any of the Associates. Submitted into the public recor in connection with item�� on ! 1_G,,E d Walter Foeman City Clerk B E R M E L L O A J A M I L & P A R T N E R S I N C 00-.UJ 0 -PROGRAM REPORTING • All employment and other related statistics and/or other records relative to the Affirmative Action Plan will be available for inspection during normal working hours to appropriate County government representatives. Please contact: Mr. Nelson C. Martinez, Personnel Director Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. 2601 South Bayshore Drive 1 Oth Floor Miami, Florida 33133 (305) 859-2050 Location of Records and Contact Person All employee personnel records and files are in the custody of Nelson C. Martinez, Personnel Director and Affirmative Action Director. Submitted into the pubft recor in connection vviith -r on LLIL — — item Walter Foeman City Clerk B E R M E L L 0 A J A M I L & P A R T N E R S I N(� (► v 6 AFFIRMATIVE ACTION POLICY FOR EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY AFFIRMATIVE ACTION/ EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY - POLICY STATEMENT It is the policy of BERMELLO, AJAMIL & PARTNERS, INC. to base its hiring and promotions on merit, qualifications and competency and that its personnel practices will not be influenced by an applicant's or employee's race, color, place of birth, religion, national origin, sex, age, marital status, veteran and handicapped status. One of the management duties of all principals at BERMELLO, AJAMIL & PARTNERS, INC. is to ensure that the following personnel practices are being satisfied: 1. Take every necessary affirmative action to attract and retain qualified employees, regardless of race, color, place of birth, religion, national origin, sex, age, marital status, veteran and handicapped status. 2. Maintain equitable principles in the recruitment, hiring, training, compensation and promotion of employees. 3. Monitor and review personnel practices to guarantee that equal opportunities are being provided to all employees, regardless of race, color, place of birth, religion, national origin, sex, age, marital status, veteran and handicapped status. BERMELLO, AJAMIL & PARTNERS, INC. is committed to take affirmative action and aggressively pursue activities that will serve to enable all employees and applicants opportunities available throughout this organization. Clearly, the above actions cannot be accomplished as a secondary duty for any individual, despite the full support of management. And so, to monitor our efforts, BERMELLO, AJAMIL & PARTNERS, INC. has assigned one of its principals as the Affirmative Action Director to monitor all activities of this program. Employees may contact Nelson Martinez at 859-2050 regarding this Affirmative Action Policy. DATE: July 28, 1999 (Signaturerritle) Willy B mello, 6r4sident Submitted into the public recor in connection with item -!� on LLLC —ve Walter Foeman City Clerk 0V`iuot) 8 E R M E L L 0 A J A M I L & P A R T N E R S I N C • • 11 PROMOTION OF MINORITIES WITHIN THE FIRM The Affirmative Action Plan is based on the principals' belief that our Dade County community can only improve if the lifestyles of every single disadvantaged group in the community is advanced. A commitment exists from our firm that as it grows and matures, special emphasis will be sought to find and provide opportunities for professional, managerial and partnership opportunities for all minorities. The firm has made positive strides in this endeavor. As one of South Florida's most diversified architectural/engineering firms, B&A has an ethnic and gender balance in the workforce that is a model for the industry: 54.1 % of its workforce is Hispanic, 8.8% is African -American, and 35.5% is female, with many in senior positions. During the past year, we promoted within the firm two women to the position of Senior Associate, as well as four women and two African -Americans to the position of Associate. We continually monitor and review personnel practices to guarantee that equal opportunities are being provided to all employees, regardless of race, color, place of birth, religion, national origin, sex, age, marital status, veteran and handicapped status. F:\BASE\GENMK7G\AFFIRMAT.99.wpd Submitted into the public recor in connection with item L-_ on -/_/ZC ad Walter Foeman City Clerk PARK PLACE AT BRICKELL MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT 1450 Brickell Avenue Directory of Project Principals Owner/Developer Park Place LLC. 848 Brickell Ave. Suite 1010 Miami, FL 33131 Telephone: (305) 371-5254 Architecture: Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. 2601 South Bayshore Drive Suite 1000 Miami, FL 33133 Telephone: (305) 859-2050 Fax: (305) 860-3700 . Willy Bermello Telephone 860-3735 Fax: (305) 860-3700 Willy_Bermello@bamiami.com Tere C. Garcia Telephone (305) 860-3758 Fax: (305) 859-7666 Tere_Garcia@bamiami.com Scott Bakos Telephone: (305) 860-3710 Fax: (305) 859-7666 Scott_Bakos@bamiami.com Landscape Architecture: Elizabeth Newland Telephone: (305) 860-3729 Fax: (305) 859-7666 Elizabeth_Newland@bamiami.com Civil: Oliverio Sanchez Telephone: (305) 860-3755 Fax: (305) 859-9638 Oliverio_Sanchez@bamiami.com Traffic: Jackson M. Ahlstedt RE . 46 N.W. 941" Street Miami Shores, FL 33150 Telephone: (305) 754-8695 Fax: (305) 754-8695 Economist: Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. 1 S.E. Third Avenue, Suite 2100 Miami, FL 33131 Telephone: (305) 374-1574 Fax: (305) 372-8161 Darryl Sharpton Dks@abccpa.com Submitted into the publiC recor in connection with item /`� on ll_JG —Gv Walter Foeman City Cleric 00-.�� U Attorneys: Greenberg Traurig P.A. 1221 Brickell Avenue Miami, FL 33131 Adrienne Friesner Pardo, Esq. Telephone: (305) 579-0683 Fax: (305) 961-5683 Pardoa@gtlaw.com C1 Submitted into the public recor in conne tion with item on ��=���° Walter Foeman City Clerk 0U` Va PARK PLACE AT BRICKELL MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Prepared for: Park Place LLC. Prepared by: Jackson M. Alstedt P.E. June 7, 2000 repo witted into item in tonne the Pub is °n /-- with Leiter Fo�'�� • Cfty Cman erir 00-1 36 PARK PLACE AT BRICKELL TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS 0 Prepared for PARK PLACE LLC 848 Brickell Avenue, Suite 1010 Miami, Florida 33131 by Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. 2601 South Bayshore Drive Suite 1000 Miami, Florida 33133 (305) 859-2050 June 2000 Submitted into the public record. in connection with item on _ 1=1(4 -w !baiter Foeman City Clerk 00r 036 • TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ... ............................... 1 2.0 PURPOSE OF STUDY ........................................... 1 3.0 STUDY AREA ............... 2 4.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS ......................................... 5 4.1 EXISTING ROADWAY CONDITIONS .......................... 5 4.2 EXISTING SIGNAL TIMING .................................. 7 4.3 EXISTING TRAFFIC COUNTS ............................... 7 4.4 MASS TRANSIT .......................................... 12 4.5 EXISTING LEVEL OF SERVICE ............................. 12 5.0 TRIP GENERATION ............................................ 16 6.0 TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT ................... 20 7.0 PROGRAMMED AND PLANNED ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS .......... 22 8.0 FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS ................................. 22 9.0 FUTURE TRAFFIC AND PROJECT TRAFFIC CONDITIONS ............ 27 10.0 ON -STREET PARKING ......................................... 32 11.0 PEDESTRIANS ............................................... 33 12.0 PROJECT SITE PLAN .......................................... 33 12.1 PROJECT DRIVEWAYS .................................... 33 12.2 PROJECT LOADING DOCK ................................ 34 . 12.3 PEDESTRIAN ACCESS .................................... 35 13.0 CONCLUSIONS ............................................... 35 Submitted into the public recor in connection with item s on ./_Ll_G — U Walter Foeman City Clerk 00-1036 Submitted into the public recorq in conne LIST OF TABLES item — �`4 on ,tion with �.�_�.(✓ —� Walter Foeman TABLE 1 City Clerk PROJECT DATA ............................................... 1 TABLE 2 1999 AVERAGE ANNUAL DAILY TRAFFIC (AADT) VOLUMES IN VEHICLES PER DAY (VPD) ........................... 7 TABLE 3 EXISTING PM PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT DATA ........ 9 TABLE 4 2000 AVERAGE ANNUAL DAILY TRAFFIC (AADT) VOLUMES IN VEHICLES PER DAY (VPD) .......................... 10 TABLE 5 EXISTING INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR CONDITIONS .......................... 13 TABLE 6 EXISTING LINK LEVEL OF SERVICE .............................. 15 TABLE 7 TOTAL PROJECT TRAFFIC ...................................... TABLE 8 EXTERNAL TRIPS ............................................. 18 TABLE 9 FINAL EXTERNAL PROJECT TRAFFIC ............................ 19 TABLE 10 PEAK HOUR PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION ....................... 20 - TABLE 11 PROGRAMMED AND PLANNED IMPROVEMENTS ................... 22 TABLE 12 FUTURE PM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES ................ 23 TABLE 13 FUTURE INTERSECTION LOS W/O PROJECT WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR CONDITIONS ........................... 24 TABLE 14 FUTURE LINK LEVEL OF SERVICE WITHOUT PROJECT .............. 26 TABLE 15 FUTURE PM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES ................ 28 TABLE 16 FUTURE INTERSECTION LOS WITH PROJECT WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR CONDITIONS .......................... 29 TABLE 17 FUTURE LINK LEVEL OF SERVICE WITH PROJECT .............:... 31 TABLE 18 EXISTING ON -STREET PARKING ................................. 32 TABLE 19 AM AND PM PEAK HOUR DRIVEWAY VOLUMES .................... 34 TABLE 20 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE SUMMARY WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR CONDITIONS .......................... 38 U-1036 0 . 0 0 LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE 1 PROJECT LOCATION ........................................... 3 FIGURE 2 STUDY AREA .................................................. 4 FIGURE 3 INTERSECTION CONFIGURATIONS ............................... 6 FIGURE 4 EXISTING TRAFFIC ............................................ 11 FIGURE 5 EXISTING LEVELS OF SERVICE ................................. 14 FIGURE 6 PROJECT TRAFFIC.ASSIGNMENT................................ 21 FIGURE 7 FUTURE LEVELS OF SERVICE W/O PROJECT ...................... 25 FIGURE 8 FUTURE LEVELS OF SERVICE WITH PROJECT ..................... 30 • Submitted into the public recor in connection with item !. on JJ--j -- . Walter Foeman City Clerk 00-1036 • • • 0 1.0 INTRODUCTION Submitted into the public recofA In connection with itemm s on 1 _ G__-0kJ Walter Foeman City Clerk Park Place At Brickell is a three phase development consisting of apartments, retail, and parking. The site is located on SE 15th Road between Brickell Avenue and South Miami Avenue as shown in Figure 1. The proposed development consists of the following components: TABLE 1 PROJECT DATA USE TYPE QUANTITI( UNITS RESIDENTIAL Studios 111 DU 1 bedroom 390 DU 2 bedroom 417 DU TOTAL 918 DU RETAIL 22,823 GSF PARKING 1,374 SPACES The residential component of the project consists of rental apartments. Retail space is intended to support residents and also draw from pedestrian traffic along Brickell Avenue, SE 15th Road and South Miami Avenue. This pedestrian activity results primarily from neighborhood activity. As planned, primary access to the site is proposed to be via driveways connecting to 15th Road and South Miami Avenue. In addition, there are three loading docks serving the project. All loading docks are intemal to the site. All loading docks are accessed by an alleyway connecting to SE 14th Terrace with a secondary exit available via a curb -cut on Brickell Avenue. The proposed development consists of three phases. For purposes of this traffic impact analysis, ultimate build -out has been estimated to occur by the year 2005. 2.0 PURPOSE OF STUDY The primary purpose of this study is to assess the impacts of vehicular traffic on signalized BERMELLO, AJAMIL & PARTNERS, INC. Park Place At Brickell June 6, 2000 00-10'D6 Pagel • • • U intersections and roadways within the study area due to the proposed development by conducting a roadway link and signalized intersection level of service analysis. In addition, the report provides a general assessment of project impacts on parking and pedestrians. Specific items discussed are as follows: ❑ Existing traffic volumes and levels of service for major roadways within the study area; ❑ Number of trips generated by the proposed project and the distribution of these trips within the study area network. Future background and project traffic conditions and levels of service; ❑ Determination of whether the impacts of the proposed project exceed the City of Miami concurrency standards, and solutions to mitigate adverse impacts, if any; See Appendix H for an analysis of the Brickell Corridor. ❑ Determination of project impacts on on -street parking; and, ❑ Determination of project impacts on pedestrians. 3.0 STUDY AREA The study area's boundaries were defined to include: the Miami River as the northern boundary, SE/SW 26th Road as the southern boundary, Biscayne Bay as the eastern boundary, and 1-95 as the western boundary. Figure 2 shows the signalized intersection and roadway links which are most significant to the project. These include the following intersections: SE 8th Street and South Miami Avenue SE 7th Street and South Miami Avenue SE 8th Street and Brickell Avenue SE 8th Street and Brickell Avenue SW 15th Road and South Miami Avenue SE 15th Road and Brickell Avenue SW 15th Road and SW 1st Avenue The roadway links include the following: Submitted into the public rec1-�inonnection with item,Walter Foeman City Clerk SE 8th Street from South Miami Avenue to Brickell Avenue SE 7th Street from South Miami Avenue to Brickell Avenue South Miami Avenue from SW 26th Road to SE 8th Street Brickell Avenue from SW 26th Road to SE 8th Street SE 15th Road from SW 4th Avenue to Brickell Avenue BERMELLO, AJAMIL & PARTNERS, INC. Park Place At Brickell June 6, 2000 Page 2 06-103f • C • FIGURE 1 PROJECT LOCATION BERMELLO, AJAMIL & PARTNERS, INC. Park Place At Brickell June 6, 2000 Page 3 00-1036 � 0 � 0 0 SE 3rd St SE 4th St N 0 NTS so* L SE 3rd 67t [SE 4 St % t tu tu SE 5th St u, SE 6th St SW 7th St z SW 8th St sw 10 1 st '2 U3 SW 131h St ♦ 7 Pam ## SITE BISCAYNE BAY ♦# LEGEND rj Metrorail Station Metrornover Station STUDY AREA BOUNDARY Submitted into the public FIGURE 2 recorojin connection with STUDY AREA item a--Ll' ®n -L� --06 BERMELLO, AJAMIL & PARTNERS, INC. Walter Foeman 1-., " City Clerk Park P4ace At Brickell June 6, 2000 Page 4 00-1036 • • C7 4.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS The study area was surveyed to observe existing traffic conditions, identify parking locations, identify traffic counts locations, and to collect traffic count data. 4.1 EXISTING ROADWAY CONDITIONS Key roadways in the study area include Brickell Avenue, South Miami Avenue, SW/SE 8th Street, SW/SE 7th Street and SW/SE 13th Street. Brickell Avenue (SR 5/US- 1) is a four lane divided roadway orientated in a general north/south direction. It contains a large number of signalized intersections. From SE 12th Street north to the Miami River, South Miami Avenue is a one-way northbound roadway. South of SE 12th Street South Miami Avenue is two-way. Adjacent to the site, South Miami Avenue has two travel lanes plus a parking lane on the west side of the street. The posted speed limit on South Miami Avenue is 30 MPH. SW/SE 7th Street (SR 90/Tamiami Trail) is a one-way roadway with three westbound lanes. SW/SE 8th Street (SR 901 Tamiami Trail) is a one-way roadway with three eastbound lanes. SW/SE 13th Street (SR 972/Coral Way) is a two-way roadway with two lanes in each direction.. East of SW 2nd Avenue, the posted speed limit on SW/SE 13th Street is 35 MPH. West of SW 2nd Avenue the posted speed limit is 40 MPH. Located to the west of the study area is Interstate 95. Area access to and from 1-95 is via SW 7th and 8th Streets. SW/SE 15th Road is a two-way roadway with two lanes in each direction. The lane configurations for each of the intersections to be analyzed are shown in Figure 3. BERMELLO, AJAMIL & PARTNERS, INC. Submitted into the public recor in connection with ite� on Walter Foeman City Clerk Park Place At Brickell June 6, 2000 Page • • I 4t 7th St Miami Avenue -0► 8th St&Umi Avenue cam S" l L (91 12th St/Mami Avenue 13th St(SW 1st Avenue ISM Rd/SW 1st Avenue 7th St/Bdckell Avenue t3th St/Brickell Avenue Submitted into the public record in connection With item =J11 on _�I—l��d Walter Foeman City Cleft I F 1 M St/Mami Avenue 13th SMckell Avenue 15th Rd/Miami Avenue 15th Rd/Bdckell Avenue FIGURE 3 INTERSECTION CONFIGURATIONS BERMELLO, AJAMIL & PARTNERS, INC. Park Place At Brickell June 6, 2000 Page 6 U L_J 4.2 EXISTING SIGNAL TIMING Submitted into the public reco In connection with itemi�-'1 on/_4_-_jG_�'r Walter Foeman City Clerk Existing signal timing data for the signalized intersections to be analyzed was obtal ed from the Miami -Dade County Traffic Control Center. This data was used in the intersection capacity analysis to determine each intersection's level of service (LOS). 4.3 EXISTING TRAFFIC COUNTS There are 6 existing Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) traffic count locations within the study area. Data for these traffic count locations is summarized in Table 2. TABLE 2 1999 AVERAGE ANNUAL DAILY TRAFFIC (AADT) VOLUMES IN VEHICLES PER DAY (VPD) Source: Florida Department of Transportation, District 6. Additional traffic count data was collected consistent with other approved MUSPs. Turning movement counts were obtained at the intersections of SE 7th Street and Brickell Avenue and SE 8th Street and Brickell Avenue, traffic counts were collected on Thursday, July 29, 1999 between 4:30 - 6:30 PM. For the intersections of SW 7th Street and South Miami Avenue and SW 8th Street and BERMELLO, AJAMIL & PARTNERS, INC. Park Place At Brickell June 6, 2000 6 0 -� 10 3 6 Page 7 0 • Miami Avenue turning movement counts were collected on Tuesday, July 27, 1999 between 4:30 - 6:30 PM. Turning movement counts were obtained at the intersections of SW 13th Street and SW 1st Avenue, SW 13th Street and South Miami Avenue, SW 13th Street and Brickell Avenue, and SW 12th Street and South Miami Avenue. Traffic counts were collected on Tuesday, November 23, 1999 between 4:30 - 6:30 PM. Turning movement counts were obtained on Thursday, February 17, 2000 between 4:30 - 6:30 PM at the following intersections: SE 15th Road and Brickell Avenue SE/SW 15th Street and South Miami Avenue SW 15th Road and SW 1 st Avenue SW 15th Road and SW 4th Avenue 24-Hour machine traffic counts were obtained on the following roadways on March 6, 2000: SE 15th Road between South Miami Avenue and Brickell Avenue SW 15th Road west of South Miami Avenue South Miami Avenue north of 15th Road South Miami Avenue south of 15th Road This traffic count data is summarized in Tables 3 and 4 and depicted on Figure 4. Submitted into the pubrIC recor n connection with item on Walter Foeman City Clerk BERMELLO, AJAMIL & PARTNERS, INC. Park Place At Brickell June 6, 2000 Page 8 00-� 0 Submitted into the public recort rem inc onneytion with on Walter Foeman City Clerk M TABLE 3 rn EXISTING PM PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT DATA r r O NORTHBOUNp SOUTHBOUNDASTBOUNp" UVESTbOUNb DtNTER5ECTtON' r go 7th St and 565 270 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1,053 61 S. Miami Avenue D SW 8th St and NA 597 41 NA NA NA 198 621 NA NA NA. NA Z S. Miami Avenue M y SE 7th St and 427 2,159 36 38 1,422 340 NA NA NA 114 437 115 Brickell Avenue Z A SE 8th St and NA 1,739 260 284 1,263 NA 396 277 203 399 NA 643 Brickell Avenue SW 13th St and 62 N/A 23 52 135 290 N/A 510 44 30 1,282 N/A SW 1st Avenue SW 13th Stand 86 189 59 16 142 234 109 373 38 31 934 105 S. Miami Avenue SW 13th St and 159 1,286 31 67 1,426 528 306 69 91 120 301 88 Brickell Avenue SW 12th St and 0 269 0 1 269 9 15 0 10 0 0 2 S. Miami Avenue SE 15th Rd and 58 585 59 33 1,543 51 31 56 115 131 67 27 Brickell Avenue I: SE 15th Rd and 80 96 . 32, 20 221 17 10 183 224 55 122 24 S. Miami Avenue SW 15th Rd and NA NA NA 125 NA 49 6 282 NA NA 200 11 SW 1st Avenue m SW 15th Rd and 5 7 21 63 121 8 2 1 8 1 9 r36 161 T20 SW 4th Avenue w NOTES: NA - Movement Not Available co D t0 0 CD - • • • • TABLE 4 2000 AVERAGE ANNUAL DAILY TRAFFIC (AADT) VOLUMES IN VEHICLES PER DAY (VPD) SE 15TH ROAD EAST OF S. MIAMI AVENUE EB 12,970 WB 2,500 5,470 SE 15TH ROAD WEST OF S. MIAMI AVENUE NB 4,630 SB 2,390 7,020 S. MIAMI AVENUE NORTH OF SE 15TH ROAD NB 2,830 SB 2,650 5,480 S. MIAMI AVENUE SOUTH OF SE 15TH ROAD NB 3,670 SB 3,660 7,330 AADT FACTOR 0.98 Source: Original Machine Traffic Counts Taken March 6, 2000. Submitted into the public reC ?� in connection item)Z on / with �G�v Walter FOeman City Clerk BERMELLO, AJAMIL & PARTNERS, INC. Park Place At Brickell June 6, 2000 Page 10 0®-1036 � 0 KI I * SE 3rd St 3rd S FSE 14- cri s E 4th S1 SE 4th St i -41 N NTS SE 5th St 1 0 -tSE 6th St 41" SW 7th St z 9 SW 8th St sw lo I St 03 w SW 131 h St 7$1 SITE BISCAYNE BAY LEGEND Metrorail Station Metromover Station EXISTING AADT ORIGINAL COUNT 2OW FDOT COUNT 1999 Submitted Into the public BERMELLO, AJAMIL & PARTNERS, IWO conneulluji VVIL11 item %--Lwon Walter Foeman City Clerk FIGURE 4 EXISTING TRAFFIC Park Place At Brickell June 6, 2000 Page 11 00-1036 • • • 4.4 MASS TRANSIT The study area is served by an extensive mass transit network. There are several Metrobus routes serving the study area including routes 6, 8, 24, 48, 95, and B. Metromover also serves the study area. The closest Metromover station is the Financial District Station located on SE 14th Street between Brickell Avenue and South Miami Avenue. This station is approximately one-half block from the proposed project. Each Metromover car has a seated capacity of 12 people. Cars are operated in pairs. Metromover vehicles operate at a 150 second headway. The closest Metrorail station is the Brickell Station located at 1001 SW 1 st Avenue. 4.5 EXISTING LEVEL OF SERVICE Each of the intersections were analyzed to determine the level of service. The Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) 1997 methodology based Highway Capacity Software, HCS Version 3.1 was used. The results are shown in Table 5 and on Figure 5. The intersection level of service analyses are included in Appendix A. BERMELLO, AJAMIL & PARTNERS, INC. Submitted into the public recur in connection , item on Walter Foeman City Gle(KI Park Place At Brickell June 6, 2000 00--1 36 Page12 • • • TABLE 5 EXISTING INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR CONDITIONS INTERSECTION EXISTING LOS Brickell Avenue and SE 7th Street D Brickell Avenue and SE 8th Street F Brickell Avenue. and SE 13th Street C S. Miami Avenue and SE 7th Street D S. Miami Avenue and SE 8th Street B SW 1 st Avenue and SW 13th Street B S. Miami Avenue and SW 13th Street B S. Miami Avenue and SW 12th Street A Brickell Avenue and SE 15th Road B S. Miami Avenue and SE/SW 15th Road B SW 1st Avenue and SW 15th Road A SW 4th Avenue and SW„15th Road, C Submitted into the public recor,�j in connect* with item i�� on _/-/6 Q Walter Foeman City Clerk BERMELLO,.AJAMIL & PARTNERS, INC. Park Place At Brickell June 6, 2000 00-1036 Page13 � 0 � 0 \ \� SE 3rd St ' .� SE 4th St 1/ N errs W ) �Qgg SE 511 St O` / w SE 6th St SW 7th St D D SW 8th St Q SW1 St Ij >> C 3 a, A / SW 13th St 8 B C / a Ar�sf �br � / wry •• % SITE s BISCAYNE BAY / LEGEND i Metrorail Station Metromover Station EXISTING LOS INTERSECTION LOS LINK LOS BERM ELLO, AJAMIL &-PAIRTNERS', INC- - - rc ;or In connection with item on Walter Foeman City Cie* FIGURE 5 EXISTING LEVELS OF SERVICE Park Place At Brickell June 6, 2000 Page 14 00-1036 • • Link analysis was also performed on six roadways within the study area using the FDOT 1998 Level of Service Handbook, Tables 5-1 and 5-4. These roadways are SW/SE 7th Street, SW/SE 8th Street, SE/SW 13th Street, Brickell Avenue, South Miami Avenue and SW/SE 15th Road. The results of these analyses are summarized in Table 6. The FDOT LOS link analyses are included in Appendix B. TABLE 6 EXISTING LINK LEVEL OF SERVICE STREET FROM TO LOS: SE 7th Street Brickell Avenue S. Miami Avenue C SE 8th Street S. Miami Avenue Brickell Avenue C Brickell Avenue SE 7th Street Miami River D Brickell Avenue SE 13th Street SE 8th Street D Brickell Avenue SE 15th Road SE 13th Street D SE 13th Street S. Miami Avenue Brickell Avenue E SE/SW 15th Road S. Miami Avenue Brickell Avenue D SE/SW 15th Road SW 2nd Avenue S. Miami Avenue F S. Miami Avenue SW 15th Road SW 13th Street C S. Miami Avenue SW 26th Road., SW 15th Road C Submitted into the public record in connection with item on J_/=/_G=/ Walter Foeman City Clerk BERMELLO, AJAMIL & PARTNERS, INC. Park Place At Brickell June 6, 2000 Page 15 00 1036 • 5.0 TRIP GENERATION • The total number of vehicular trips generated by the land uses, apartments and retail space was determined for the PM peak hour using the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Trip Generation, 6th Edition. The number of vehicular trips generated by the apartments was based on the total number of apartments, using data for ITE Land Use Code 220. The number of trips generated by the retail space was based on the total square footage of retail space using data for ITE Land Use Code 814, This was done in order to determine the worst case scenario. The results are shown in Table 7. These trips are the total number of vehicular trips generated by the project before adjusting for internal trips and pedestrian and mass transit trips. ecbmitteo, irIto item n1 Connthectio Pubilc w'n with arter F Denys City C/erk BERMELLO, AJAMIL & PARTNERS, INC. Park Place At Brickell June 6, 2000 Page16 0 . 0 • • rI TABLE 7 TOTAL PROJECT TRAFFIC NOTES: 1.) AM traffic for Retail is based upon AM Peak Hour of Generator. Submitted into the public recoA in connection with ite L,-on !Natter Foeman City Clerk BERMELLO, AJAMIL & PARTNERS, INC. Park Place At Bdckell June 6, 2000 Page 17 0 The first adjustment to the trips shown ,in Table 7 was made to account for internalization Of trips in a mixed use development. Using techniques documented in the ITE publication Trip Generation Handbook, October 1998 it was determined that on a daily basis approximately 3% of the trips shown in Table 7 would be internal trips. For the PM Peak Hour it was determined that approximately 2% of the trips shown in Table 7 would be internal trips. Table 8 summarizes external trips for the project before accounting for modal splits. TABLE 8 EXTERNAL TRIPS Consistent with other approved MUSPs in the area; a modal spilt of 15% and vehicle occupancy of 1.4 was used. Because of its proximity to the Metrorail and Metromover systems, it is anticipated that 15% of person trips will use mass transit. These person trips will not negatively effect the traffic conditions, and therefore, are not included in the vehicle trips distributed throughout the study area. The remaining 85% of the person trips generated by the project were distributed throughout the study area as vehicle trips. Submitted into the public record -.)in c nne tion with item 2-i`�ona /:::/ d Walter Foeman BERMELLO, AJAMIL S PARTNERS, INC. UTY UIe .firk Place At Brickell June 6, 2000 Page 18 C0-10'31 • • E TABLE 9 FINAL EXTERNAL PROJECT TRAFFIC As can be seen from Table 9, the estimated number of vehicle trips entering the project during the PM peak hour is 310. The estimated number of vehicle trips leaving the project during the PM peak hour is 168. Subl'61ttdd IhtO the public recor in connection with item Z—1 Ll Walter Foeman City clezk BERMELLO, AJAMIL & PARTNERS, INC. Park Place At Bdckell June 6, 2000 �-�� Page19 Submitted into the public rec0r in connection with item LEI on 11 6.0 TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT Walter Foeman City Clerk The project site is located in Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) 673. The cardinal distribution of the traffic within TAZ 673 was obtained from Miami -Dade County. The distribution is as follows: North -Northeast 22.68% East -Northeast 6.59% East -Southeast 0.64% South -Southeast 0.96% South -Southwest 4.76% West -Southwest 22.44% West -Northwest 18.67% North -Northwest 23.26% • The distribution of AM and PM project trips is summarized in Table 10. Based upon this trip distribution, the project trips were assigned to the roadway network. This is shown in Figure 6. TABLE 10 PEAK HOUR PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION BERMELLO, AJAMIL & PARTNERS, INC. Park Place At Brickell June 6, 2000 Page 20 00-1036 � 0 0 SE 3rd St (� SE 4th St 0 8 W NTS 4 ir W / � SE 5th St W SE 6th St SW 7th St 29.3s-%� I / z:1 ! , SW Sth St 4 (0 'U, 437 SW 13 St < 3.6,i btKMtLLU, AJAMIL & PARTNERS, INC. Submitted Into thPublic reCO3W- in connect i )n with item' tZ:L'1- on — SITE Walter :oemaiq C ty Clerk 0I%3%.wtA T INC: BAY LEGEND Metrorail Station Metromover Station PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT --K-22.44% PERCENTAGE OF OUTBOUND TRAFFIC =44% PERCENTAGE OF INBOUND TRAFFIC FIGURE 6 PROJECT TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT Park Place At Brickell June 6, 2000 00-1036 Pap 21 • 7.0 PROGRAMMED AND PLANNED ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS Using the Metro -Dade Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), 2000, the programmed and planned improvements in the study area were determined. These improvements are detailed in Table 11. TABLE 11 PROGRAMMED AND PLANNED IMPROVEMENTS 8.0' FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS Future traffic conditions were analyzed for year 2005. A growth rate of 2% per year was applied to the 1999 FDOT traffic counts and the 2000 traffic volumes in order to achieve 2005 background traffic volumes. To this was added committed development traffic. Table 12 details the future background plus committed development traffic volumes. These volumes were then used to determine intersection and link level of service by using the same software programs and LOS tables as used for previous analysis. The intersection level of service for the future background traffic volumes are shown in Table 13 and on Figure 7. Each intersection's level of service ranged from B to F. These values are generally the same as those for the year 2000. The intersection level of service analyses are included in Appendix C. The link level of service analysis for future traffic conditions was performed on the roadway links identified previously. These results are summarized in Table 14. The link level of service analyses for future traffic conditions are included in Appendix D. Submitted Into the public reco in connectio WV item --/y on M-d Walter Foeman City Clerk BERMELLO, AJAMIL & PARTNERS, INC. Park Place At l3dcke11 June 6, 2000 Page 22 0 RL L n c cD m D m W N N n N ' O N W O _ Submitted into the Public t reco in tonne • item coon with on ,�'LL Walter FOeman City Clerk TABLE 12 FUTURE PM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES WITHOUT PROJECT NbRTHBOUND SOUTHHOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND . INTERSECTION ,; L T LSW 7th St and 783 440 NA NA NA t NA NA NA NA 1,332 69 S. Miami Avenue SW 8th St and NA 900 79 NA NA NA 279 799 NA NA NA NA S. Miami Avenue SE 7th St and 508 2,794 40 43 1,780 504 NA NA NA 129 492 130 Brickell Avenue SE 8th St and NA 2,645 293 342 1,620 NA 563 551 365 457 NA 853 Brickell Avenue SW 13th Stand 70 N/A 26 139 152 371 N/A 713 49 33 1.444 N/A SW 1st Avenue SW 13th St and 97 265 67 18 159 263 165 562 88 35 1,274 163 S. Miami Avenue SW 13th St and 439 1,795 111 95 1,862 744 395 195 239 183 411 148 Brickell Avenue SW 12th St and 0 362 0 1 303 10 17 0 11 0 0 2 S. Miami Avenue SE 15th Rd and 64 735 187 36 1,873 87 53 63 127 154 77 30 Brickell Avenue SE 15th Rd and 89 106. 35 22 244 19 11 203 247 61 134 26 S. Miami Avenue SW 15th Rd and 0 0 0 138 0 54 7 312 0 0 221 12 SW 1st Avenue SW 15th Rd and 5 8 23 70 133 9 2 52 10 39 178 SW 4th Avenue NOTES: NA - Movement Not Available • is • • TABLE 13 FUTURE INTERSECTION LOS W/O PROJECT WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR CONDITIONS Brickell Avenue and SE 7th Street D Brickell Avenue and SE 8th Street F Brickell Avenue and SE 13th Street F S. Miami Avenue and SE 7th Street F S. Miami Avenue and SE 8th Street C SW 1 st Avenue and SW 13th Street C S. Miami Avenue and SW 13th Street C S. Miami Avenue and SW 12th Street A Brickell Avenue and SE 15th Road B S. Miami Avenue and SE/SW 15th Road B SW 1 St Avenue and SW 15th Road A SW 4th Avenue and SW .15th: Road .. ... ,; C BERMELLO, AJAMIL & PARTNERS, INC. Submitted into the public reCO. In connection with Item l i on Walter Foeman City Clerk Park Place At Brickell June 6, 2000 Page 24 00-1036 • r� FIGURE 7 is FUTURE LEVELS OF SERVICE W/O PROJECT BERMELLO, AJAMIL & PARTNERS, INC. Park Place At Brickell June 6, 2000 Page 25 00--1036 • TABLE 14 FUTURE LINK LEVEL OF SERVICE WITHOUT PROJECT • STREET" FROM " TO LOS.. SE 7th Street Brickell Avenue S. Miami Avenue C SE 8th Street S. Miami Avenue Brickell Avenue D Brickell Avenue SE 7th Street Miami River F Brickell Avenue SE 13th Street SE 8th Street F Brickell Avenue SE 15th Road SE 13th Street E SE 13th Street S. Miami Avenue Brickell Avenue F SE/SW 15th Road S. Miami Avenue Brickell Avenue D SEJSW 15th Road SW 2nd Avenue S. Miami Avenue F S. Miami Avenue SW 15th Road SW 13th Street D S. Miami Avenue SW 26th Road SW 15th Road . , C Submitted into the public reoo w In Connection With li;@hl on Walter Foeman City Clerk BERIVIELLO, AJAMIL & PARTNERS, INC. Park Place At Brickell June 6, 2000 Rage 26 0 0 - U • • 9A FUTURE TRAFFIC AND PROJECT TRAFFIC CONDITIONS Future traffic and project traffic conditions were analyzed for year 2005. This was accomplished by using the 2005 estimated traffic volumes and adding the traffic generated by the project (as shown in Table 10). Table 15 details the future background plus project volumes for the PM peak hour. These volumes were then used to determine the intersection and link levels of service using the same procedure as previously stated. It should be noted that no adjustment was made to reflect the elimination of existing traffic attributable to the existing on -site development. The existing site contains approximately 60,193 GSF of office space; and is estimated to generate approximately 25 inbound and 122 outbound vehicle trips during the PM peak Hour. For the most part, there were only minor changes between the year 2005 future intersection level of service and the year 2005 future background plus project volumes. This is shown in Table 16 and on Figure 8. The intersection level of service analyses are included in Appendix E. The link level of service analysis for future traffic and project traffic conditions was performed on the previously identified roadway links. These results are summarized in Table 17. The link level of service analyses for future traffic and project traffic conditions are included in Appendix F. Submitted into the public record on Walter iv C_n c cu � D m m rn W N N M. O X N O (p ODO= Submitted into the public reco in connectio with item — on . Walter Foeman City Clerk TABLE 15 FUTURE PM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES WITH PROJECT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND< EASTBOUNp WESTBOUNp .INTERSECTION ' L T R SW 7th St and 853 478 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1,332 69 S. Miami Avenue SW 8th St and NA 1,008 79 NA NA NA 279 799 NA NA NA NA S. Miami Avenue SE 7th St and 508 2,805 40 43 1,800 504 NA NA NA 129 492 130 Brickell Avenue SE 811h St and NA 2,656 293 342 1,640 NA 563 551 365 457 NA 853 Brickell Avenue SW 13th St and 70 N/A 26 139 222 371 N/A 713 49 33 1.444 N/A SW 1st Avenue SW 13th St and 97 334 73 18 159 263 165 562 88 46 1,274 163 S. Miami Avenue SW 13th St and 439 1,800 111 95 1,871 755 401 195 239 183 411 148 Brickell Avenue SW 12th St and 0 431 0 1 303 10 17 0 11 0 0 2 S. Miami Avenue SE 15th Rd and 84 735 187 36 1,873 96 58 63 138 154 77 30 Brickell Avenue SE 15th Rd and 89 145 104 28 265 19 124 289 247 77 134 67 S. Miami Avenue SW 15th Rd and 0 0 0 - 208 0 54 7 441 0 0 221 12 SW 1st Avenue SW 15th Rd and 5 8 23 199 133 9 2 52 10 39 178 22 SW 4th Avenue NOTES: NA - Movement Not Available • • �J • • TABLE 16 FUTURE INTERSECTION LOS WITH PROJECT WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR CONDITIONS INTERSECTION 2000 LOS, _ 2005 LOS W/O P.ROJECT 2005 LO$, WITH ,x PROJECTr Brickell Avenue and SE 7th Street D D D Brickell Avenue and SE 8th Street F F F Brickell Avenue and SE 13th Street C F F S. Miami Avenue and SE 7th Street D F F S. Miami Avenue and SE 8th Street B C C SW 1 st Avenue and SW 13th Street B C C S. Miami Avenue and SW 13th Street B C D S. Miami Avenue and SW 12th Street A A A Brickell Avenue and SE 15th Road B B B S. Miami Avenue and SE/SW 15th Road B B F SW 1st Avenue and SW 15th Road A A B SW 4th Avenue and SW 15th Road C ... C E Submitted Into the public record In connection with item -��1 on/LLL--oL Waiter Foeman City Clerk BERMELLO, AJAMIL & PARTNERS, INC. Park Place At Brickell June 6, 2000 u 0— I N b Page 29 • U FIGURE 8 • FUTURE LEVELS OF SERVICE WITH PROJECT BERMELLO, AJAMIL & PARTNERS, INC. Park Place At Bdckell June 6, 2000 V (� (� (� r Page 30 V ` 1!l � 'U • • TABLE 17 FUTURE LINK LEVEL OF SERVICE WITH PROJE SE 7th Street Bnckell Avenue S. Miami Avenue C SE 8th Street S. Miami Avenue Bnckell Avenue D Brickell Avenue SE 7th Street Miami River F Bnckell Avenue SE 13th Street SE 8th Street F Bnckell Avenue SE 15th Road SE 13th Street E SE 13th Street S. Miami Avenue Bnckell Avenue F SE/SW 15th Road S. Miami Avenue Bnckell Avenue D SE/SW 15th Road SW 2nd Avenue S. Miami Avenue F S. Miami Avenue SW 15th Road SW 13th Street D S. Miami Avenue SW 26th Road SW 15th Road C Submitted info the record in connect on with (tern � an with Walter Foeman City Cleric BERMELLO, AJAMIL & PARTNERS, INC. Park Place At Bnckell June 6, 2000 0 r 36 Page 31 • • • 10.0 ON -STREET PARKING There is a significant amount of on -street parking within close proximity of the project. Most on -parking is metered parking with a 3 hour limit and 15 minutes for 25 cents. Existing on - street parking is summarized in Table 18. TABLE 18 EXISTING ON -STREET PARKING SE 15th Road I S. Miami Avenue S. Miami Avenue I SW/SE 14th Terrace S. Miami Avenue I SW/15th Road Brickell Avenue SW/SE 14th Street SW/SE 14th Terrace 7 metered spaces on the south side. 18 metered spaces on the east side. 12 metered spaces on the west side. 12 metered spaces on the east side. 3 metered spaces on the west side. 11 TOTAL 152 metered spaces .� As a result of the proposed driveways on South Miami Avenue, the project will likely result in the elimination of a number of existing on -street parking spaces on the east side of South Miami Avenue adjacent to the site. The project will construct some 1,365 on -site parking spaces. -Parking will be provide for residents, employees and visitors to the site. Subrn'tted reco nto th item�'nonnect On vv,. th alter eman CittPOr Clerk BERMELLO, AJAMIL & PARTNERS, INC. Park Place At Brickell June 6, 2000 Page 32 0-06 0 11.0 PEDESTRIANS Little pedestrian activity was noted in the immediate vicinity of the site. There are pedestrian provisions in the traffic signals at 15th Road and Brickell Avenue and 15th Road and South Miami Avenue. The signal at Brickell Avenue provides at least 23 seconds of green time to cross Brickell Avenue. Given the minimal amount of eastbound left turns and westbound right turns at this location, this should provide for adequate pedestrian crossing conditions on the north cross -walk at this intersection. The signal at South Miami Avenue provides at least 8 seconds of green time to cross South Miami Avenue. Since South Miami Avenue is four lanes at this intersection, this does not appear to be adequate. East/west green time on 15th Road could be increased. This would improve the ability of pedestrians to cross South Miami Avenue. The proposed project enhances pedestrian movement on Brickell Avenue by eliminating several existing curb -cuts. As discussed later, the proposed site plan only proposes a single service vehicle exit driveway on Brickell Avenue. 12.0 PROJECT SITE PLAN ! Traffic and transportation aspects of the proposed site plan were reviewed and analyzed. 12.1 PROJECT DRIVEWAYS Each of the three'phases of the proposed project includes a one -lane, one-way driveway serving a drop-off area plus a two-lane, two-way driveway serving the parking garage. The driveways serving Phases 1 and 2 of the project connect to South Miami Avenue. The driveways serving Phase 3 of the project connect to Brickell Avenue. As currently proposed, each of the driveways serving the parking garages branches to three lanes, one inbound lane, one outbound lane, and a reversible lane at a control point. The Phase 1 configuration locates the control point approximately 55 feet from the right-of-way line on South Miami Avenue. The Phase 2 configuration locates the control point approximately 90 feet from the right-of-way line on South Miami Avenue. The Phase 3 configuration locates the control point approximately 80 feet from the right-of-way line on SE 15th Road. Table 19 summarizes the AM and PM peak hour driveway volumes anticipated at the service points. Submitted into the Public recor in connection with item on Walter Foeman City Clerk BERMELLO, AJAMIL & PARTNERS, INC. Park Place At Brickell June 6, 2000 61 0 - 1 u' Page 33 Submitted into the recblic item in connection with TABLE 19 on AM AND PM PEAK "HOUR DRIVEWAY VOLUMES Walter Foeman IN VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH) Cify Cietk Analysis of potential inbound queues for all phases indicates that during the PM peak hour that there is approximately a 90% probability that for all three phases each queue should not exceed 1 vehicle. Thus, the inbound queue space appears adequate to preclude disruption to traffic flow on South Miami Avenue or on SE 15th Road. The inbound queues during the PM peak hour may, however, impact vehicles attempting to exit the internal drop- off lanes. Analysis of potential outbound queues for all phases indicates that during the AM peak hour that there is approximately a 90% probability that the queue should not exceed 2 vehicles. It is anticipated that this will not result in any significant queuing within the garage. This would not have any impact on traffic operations on South Miami Avenue or on SE 15th Road. The proposed site plan uses an existing median opening in SE 15th Road for main access and egress to the Phase 3 parking garage. The site plan proposes to add a left turn storage lane to facilitate use of this median opening and to construct an additional median opening in SE 15th Road to permit eastbound SE 15th Road traffic to enter the pick-up drop-off lane serving Phase 3 of the project. If these median openings are desirable to eliminate eastbound "U" turn movements at the intersection of SE 15th Road and Brickell Avenue, minimize project traffic on Brickell Avenue north of SE 15th Road, and eliminate westbound "U" turn movements at the intersection of 15th Road and South Miami Avenue. 12.2 PROJECT LOADING DOCK The proposed site plan includes three loading dock areas. The Phase 1 loading dock consists of two 12' by 55' berths plus two 10' by 20' berths. The Phase 2 loading dock ® consists of two 12' by 55' berths plus two 10' by 20' berths. The Phase 3 loading dock BERMELLO, AJAMIL & PARTNERS, INC. Park Place At Brickell June 6, 2000 Page 34 • 0 • consists of two 12' by 55' berths plus two 10' by 20' berths. These should be adequate to serve the type and magnitude of development anticipated. All loading docks are intemal to the site. Loading dock maneuvering will not impact traffic flow or pedestrian movements on public rights -of -way. The loading dock areas are accessed via an alleyway connecting to SE 14th Street. An exit only alleyway is proposed to connect to Brickell Avenue. Although as the site plan is refined and developed in greater detail, some refinement of vehicle maneuvering areas should be anticipated, the general concept of the intemalized loading docks should be acceptable. 12.3 PEDESTRIAN ACCESS The proposed site plan provides good pedestrian access to Brickell Avenue, SE 15th Road, and South Miami Avenue. In addition to the existing sidewalk area on Brickell Avenue, the site plan proposes a wide pedestrian area along the Brickell Avenue frontage. Pedestrian access to the project on SE 15th Road is focused towards two large pedestrian plazas, one located at the corner of SE 15th Road and Brickell Avenue and the other at the comer of 15th Road and South Miami Avenue. 13.0 CONCLUSIONS After reviewing the results from the intersection analysis and the roadway link analysis, with the exception of the following intersections the intersections' levels of service remain the same from existing traffic volumes to the future plus project traffic. ❑ SE 13th Street and Brickell Avenue; ❑ SE 7th Street and South Miami Avenue; ❑ SE 8th Street and South Miami Avenue; ❑ SW 13th Street and SW 1 st Avenue; ❑ SW 13th Street and South Miami Avenue; ❑ SE 15th Road and Brickell Avenue; ❑ SE 15th Road and South Miami Avenue; ❑ SE 15th Road and SW 1 st Avenue; and ❑ SE 15th Road and SW 4th Avenue Submitted into the Public recur in connection With item on Walter Foeman City Clerk Although the roadway link analysis yields slightly different level of service results, it also indicates that roadway levels of service remain relatively consistent through the year 2005 with the project. For the intersection of SE 13th Street and Brickell Avenue, the intersection level of service BERMELLO, AJAMIL & PARTNERS, INC. Park Place At Brickell June 6, 2000 Page 35 00 10,36 Submitted into the public record in connection with Item fl on lzz,�--4/ is anticipated to degrade from the existing LOS C to LOS F in the yea&`✓2'005=VtthLor without the project. Preliminary analysis indicates that this condition can be Gn-itigato by the following modifications: ❑ Changing from a 115 second cycle length to a .120 second cycle length; ❑ Restriping the eastbound approach from its existing configuration (one left, one shared through plus left and one shared through plus right turn lane) to two left turn lanes plus a shared through plus right turn lane; and, ❑ Restriping the westbound approach from its existing configuration (one left, one through plus one exclusive right turn lane) to one left, one through lane plus a shared through plus right turn lane. For the intersection of SE 7th Street and South Miami Avenue, the intersection level of service is anticipated to degrade from the existing LOS D to LOS F in the year 2005 with or without the project. This condition can be mitigated by the following modifications: ❑ Restriping the westbound approach from its existing configuration (two through plus one exclusive right turn lanes) to two through lanes plus a shared through plus right turn lane; and, ❑ Restriping the northbound approach from its existing configuration (left turn lane, shared left plus through, plus one exclusive through lane) to two left turn lanes plus a through lane. For the intersection of SE 8th Street and South Miami Avenue, the intersection level of service is anticipated to degrade from the existing LOS B to LOS C in the year 2005 with the project. This condition does not require mitigation. For the intersection of 7th Street and Brickell Avenue, the intersection level of service is anticipated to remain the existing LOS D with future background plus project traffic in the year 2005. This condition does not require mitigation. c Co a? For the intersection of 8th Street and Brickell Avenue, the intersection level of service is c 1 o v anticipated to further degrade from the existing LOS F with future plus project traffic in the a 0 1 � year 2005. Preliminary analysis of this situation indicates that this condition may be ., a a; U . rY Y Y c C o improved by: ❑ Changing from a 115 second cycle length to a 120 second cycle length; and, 2 � ❑ Changing the westbound approach striping from its existing left turn, 1 g g pp p g g shared left turn o and right turn, and right turn lanes to two left turn lanes plus one right turn lane. For the intersection of 15th Road and Brickell Avenue, the intersection level of service is anticipated to remain the existing LOS B with future plus project traffic in the year 2005. This condition does not require mitigation. At the intersection of 15th Road and South Miami Avenue, the intersection level of service BERMELLO, AJAMIL & PARTNERS, INC. Park Place At Brickell June 6, 2000 Page 36 00-106 is anticipated to degrade from LOS B to LOS F with future plus project traffic in the year 2005. Preliminary analysis of this situation indicates that this condition may be improved to LOS B by minor retiming of the traffic signal. For the intersection of 15th Road and SW 1 st Avenue, the intersection level of service is anticipated to degrade from the existing LOS A to LOS B with future plus project traffic in the year 2005. This condition does not require mitigation. At the intersection of 15th Road and SW 4th Avenue, the southbound left tum is anticipated to degrade from the existing LOS C to LOS E with future plus project traffic in the year 2005. Although, this condition does not require mitigation, it may be anticipated that this intersection may need to be signalized in the future. The results of all of these analyses are shown in Table 20 and the analyses are included in Appendix G. 11 Submitted into the public recor in connection item/ with on /— Walter Foeman ® City Clerk BERMELLO, AJAMIL S PARTNERS, INC. Park Place At Brickell June 6, 2000 036 3 6 Page 37 0 u • 1E • TABLE 20 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE SUMMARY WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR CONDITIONS INTERSECTION 2000 LOS . 2005 LOS ,1 2005 LOS 2005 LOS `; Wl0 PROJECT W/PROJECT ; 'WtPROJECT `! A.ND M Brickell Avenue and D D D N/A SE 7th Street Brickell Avenue and F F F F SE 8th Street Brickell Avenue and C F F E SE 13th Street S. Miami Avenue D F F C and SE 7th Street S. Miami Avenue B C C N/A and SE 8th Street SW 1 st Avenue and B C C N/A SW 13th Street S. Miami Avenue B C D N/A and SW 13th Street S. Miami Avenue A A A N/A and SW 12th Street Brickell Avenue and B B B N/A SE 15th Road S. Miami Avenue B B F B and SE/SW 15th Road SW 1st Avenue and A A B N/A SW 15th Road SW 4th Avenue and C C E N/A SW 15th Road Submitted into the public recc>p-, in connect ion with an Walter Foeman City Clerk, BERMELLO, AJAMIL & PARTNERS, INC. Park Place At Brickell June 6, 2000 r 3 6 Page 38 0' 0 • APPENDIX A Existing Intersection Level of Service Submitted into the public reco P in connection with items on Walter Foeman City Clerk 06-10 6 HCS: Signals Release 3.1 Submitted into Jackson M. Ahlstedt . reCorrdd, jn the Public Jackson M. Ahlstedt, P.E. item �' in with Jackson M. Ahlstedt, P.E. on 46 N.W. 94th Street Walter -� Miami Shores, Florida 33150 /altoeman Phone: (305) 754-8695 Fax: (305) 754-6695 CjFClerk rk OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Intersection: SE 7TH ST/BRICKELL AVE City/State: MIAMI/FLORIDA Analyst: J. AHLSTEDT Project No: BRICKELL GRAND Time Period Analyzed: EXIST PM PEAK HOUR Date: 7/29/99 East/West Street Name: SE 7TH STREET North/South Street Name: BRICKELL AVENUE VOLUME DATA I Eastbound I Westbound { Northbound ( Southbound I I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R 1 Volume1 1114 437 115 1427 2159 36 138 340 1422 PHF 1 10.60 0.82 0.76 10.87 0.97 0.88 10.71 0.98 0.90 1 PK 15 Vol 1 147 133 38 1123 556 10 113 363 94 1 Hi Ln Vol 1 I I I I % Grade 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 Ideal Sat 1 11900 1900 1900 11900 1900 11900 1900 1900 1 ParkExist 1 I 1 NumPark I I I i HeavyVeh1 Ip 0 p 2 2 Z 2 2 No. Lanes 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 12 2 0 1p 1 2 1 1 LGConfig 1 I L LT R I L TR I L T R Lane Width 1 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vol 1 I I I I Adj Flow 1 1190 533 1491 2226 154 1451 1 %InSharedLnl 10 Prop Turns 1 10.00 NumPeds I 0 1 50 1 50 1 50 1 NumBus 1 10 0 0 10 0 10 0 0 1 Duration 1.00 Area Type: CBD or Similar OPERATING PARAMETERS I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I { L T R I L T R I L T R { L T R { Init Unmet 1 10.0 0.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 Arriv. Type1 13 3 3 13 3 13 3 3 i Unit Ext. 1 13.0 3.0 3.0 13.0 3.0 13.0 3.0 3.0 I I Factor 1 1 1.000 1 1.000 1 1.000 1 Lost Time 1 12.0 2.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 2.0 1 Est of g 1 12.0 2.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 2.0 1 Ped Min g 1 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 I PHASE DATA Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left I NB Left A ® Thru I Thru P Right I Right P Peds I Ped EMSTING.doc 1 66-1036 WB Left A I SB Left A P Thru A I Thru P Right A i Right Submitted into the public Pods Ped decor in connection with NB Right I EB Right item /` On ILIC-LK/ SB Right WB Right Walter Foeman City Clerk Green 20.0 33.0 49.0 Yellow 4.0 3.0 4.0 All Red 1.0 0.0 1.0 Cycle Length: 115.0 secs VOLUME ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET Adjusted Prop. Prop. Appr./ Mvt Flow No. Lane Flow Rate Left Right Movement Volume PHF Rate Lanes Group RTOR In Lane Grp Turns Turns Eastbound Left 0 Thru 0 Right 0 Westbound Left 114 0.60 190 1 L 190 Thru 437. 0.82 533 1 LT 533 0.00 Right 115 0.76 1 R Northbound Left 427 0.87 491 2 L 491 Thru 2159 0..97 2226 2 TR 2226 Right 36 0.88 0 Southbound Left 38 0.71 54 1 L 54 Thru 1422 0.96 1451 2 T 1451 Right 340 0.90 1 R Value entered by user. SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET Appr/ Ideal Adj Lane Sat f f f f f f f f f Sat Group Flow W HV G P BB A LU RT LT Flow Eastbound Sec LT Adj/LT Sat: Westbound Sec LT Adj/LT Sat: L 1900 .1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.90 1.G0 ---- 0.950 1624 LT 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.90 1.00 1.000 R 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000, 1.000 1.000 0.90 1.00 ---- Northbound Sec LT Adj/LT Sat: L 1900 1.000 0.980 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.90 0.97 ---- 0.950 3090 TR 1900 1.000 0.960 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.90 0.95 1.000 Southbound L 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Sec LT Adj/LT Sat: 0.90 1.00 0.075 0.950 129 1624 T 1900 1.000 0.980 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.90 0.95 1.000 R 1900 1.000 0.980 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.90 1.00 ---- EMST1NG.doc 2 00-I036 CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORRSHEET Adj Adj Sat Flow Green --Lane Group-- Appr/ Lane Flow Rate Flow Rate Ratio Ratio Capacity v/c Mvmt Group (v) (s) (v/s) (g/C) (c) Ratio Eastbound Pri. Sec. Left Thru Right Westbound Pri. Sec. Left L Thru LT Right R Northbound Pri. Sec. Left L Thru TR Right Southbound Pri. Sec. Left L Thru T Right R 190 1624 533 491 3090 2226 54 0 54 1451 1624 129 0.12 0.16 0.03 0.00 Submitted into the Public Ico in connection with itemZonG 0.174 Walter Foeman zsz o.67 City Cleric 0.174 0.287 887 0.55 0.426 0.278 452 0.461 63 0.739 515 0.426 0.426 0.12 0.00 0.10 Sum (v/s) critical - 0.00 Lost Time/Cycle, L = 0.00 sec Critical v/c(X) = 0.00 LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEET Appr/ Ratios Unf Prog Lane Incremental Res Lane Group Approach Lane Del Adj . Grp Factor Del Del Grp v/c g/C dl Fact Cap k d2 d3 Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound Westbound L 0.67 0.174 44.4 1.000 282 0.25 6.4 0.0 50.9 D LT 0.174 1.000 0.0 50.9 D R 0.174 1.000 0.0 Northbound L 0.55 0.2B7 34.8 1.000 887 0.15 O.B 0.0 35.5 D TR 0.426 1.000 0.50 0.0 35.5 D Southbound L 0.10 0.739 31.0 1.000 515 0.11 0.1 0.0 31.1 C T 0.426 1.000 0.50 0.0 31.1 C R 0.426 1.000 0.50 0.0 Intersection Delay = 39.2 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = D SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED LT WORKSHEET for exclusive lefts EMSTING.doc 3 00-136 APPROACH EB Cycle Length, C 115.0 sec Actual Green Time for Lane Group, G Effective Green Time for Lane Group, g Opposing Effective Green Time, go Number of Lanes in Lane Group, N Number of Opposing Lanes, No Adjusted Left -Turn Flow Rate, Vlt Proportion of Left Turns in Opposing Flow, Plto Adjusted Opposing Flow Rate, Vo Lost Time for Lane Group, tl Left Turns per Cycle; LTC=V1tC/3600 Opposing Flow per Lane, Per Cycle: Volc-VoC/3600fluo Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo (Table 9-2 or Eqn 9-7) gf=[Gexp(- a * (LTC ** b))I-tl, gf<=g Opposing Queue Ratio: qro=1-Rpo(go/C) gq=(4.943Volc**0.762)[(gro**1.061)-tl], gq<=g Su =g-gq if gq>=gf, =g-gf if gq<gf n=(gq-gf)/2, n>=0 Ptho=l-Plto P1*-Plt[1+{(N-1)g/(gf+gu/Ell+4.24))) Ell (Figure 9-7) E12-(I-Ptho**n)/Plto, E12>-1.0 fmin-2(1+Plt)/g or fmin-2(1+P1)/g gdiff-max(gq-gf,0) fm=[gf/g]+[gu/g][1/{l+P1(Ell-1)}1, (min-fmin;max-1.00) flt-fm=[gf/g]+gdiff[1i{1+Plt(E12-1)1] WB NB SB 85.0 53.00 49.0 1 2 54 0.00 2226 4.00 1.73 37.43 1.00 0.0 0.57 53.00 0.00 26.50 1.00 1.00 12.19 1.00 0.08 0.00 0.08 +[gu/9][1/(1+Plt(Ell-1)],(min=fmin;max=1.0) or flt=[fm+0.91(N-1))/N** fit 0.075 For special case of single -lane approach opposed by multilane approach, see text. * If PD -1 for shared left -turn lanes with N>l, then assume de -facto left -turn lane and redo calculations. ** For permitted left -turns with multiple exclusive left -turn lanes,'flt=fm. For special case of multilane approach opposed by single -lane approach or when gf>gq, see text. SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED LT WORKSHEET for shared lefts APPROACH EB WB NB SB Cycle Length, C 115.0 sec Actual Green Time for Lane Group, G Effective Green Time for Lane Group, g Opposing Effective Green Time, go Number of Lanes in. Lane Group, N Number of Opposing Lanes. No Adjusted Left -Turn Flow Rate, Vlt Proportion of Left Turns in Lane Group, Pit Submitted Proportion of Left Turns in Opposing Flow, Plto �COr Into the PUbll Adjusted Opposing Flow Rate, Vo In connection C Lost Time for Lane Group, tl -�y On 7i ,� Vylith Left Turns per Cycle: LTC=V1tC/3600 `- __CV Opposing Flow per Lane, Per Cycle: Volc-VoC/3600fluo.• Walter FOem Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo (Table 9-2 or Eqn 9-7)6�,I";ems,,, an gf=[Gexp(- a * (LTC ** b))]-tl, gf<=g City Clerk Opposing Queue Ratio: qro-l-Rpo(go/C). gq=(4.943Volc**0.762)[(gro**1.061)-tl], gq<=g gu =g-gq if gq>=gf, -g-gf if gq<gf n=(gq-gf)/2, n>=0 Ptho=l-Plto P1--Plt[l+{(I3-1)9/(gf+gu/Ell+4.24))) Ell (Figure 9-7) E12-(1-Ptho**n)/Plto, E12>=1.0. fmin=2(1+Plt)/g or fmin=2(1+P1)/g gdiff--max(gq-gf,0) fm=[gf/g]+[gu/91[1/{l+Pl(E11-1)1], (min-fmin;max=1.00) EMSTING.doc 4 00-1036 flt=fm-[gf/g]+gdiff[1/{l+Plt(E12-1)1] +[gu/g]jl/(1+Plt(Ell-1)),(min=fmin;max-1.0) or flt=[fm+0.91(N-1)]/N*= flt Primary For special case of single -lane approach opposed by multilane approach, see text. If P1>=1 for shared left -turn lanes with N>1, then assume de -facto left -turn lane and redo calculations. * For permitted left -turns with multiple exclusive left -turn lanes, flt=fm. For special case of multilane approach opposed by single -lane approach or when gf>gq, see text. SUPPLEMENTAL UNIFORM DELAY WORKSHEET EBLT WBLT NBLT SBLT Adj. IT Vol from Vol Adjustment Worksheet, v 54 v/c ratio from Capacity Worksheet, X 0.00 Primary phase effective green, g 53.00 Secondary phase effective green, gq 53.00 (From Supplemental Permitted LT Worksheet), gu 0.00 Cycle length, C 115.0 Red-(C-g-gq-gu), r 30.0 Arrivals: v/(3600(max(X,1.0))), qa 0.02 Primary ph. departures: s/3600, sp 0.451 Secondary ph. departures: s(gq+gu)/(gu*3600), ss 53.00 Xperm 9.99 XProt 0.06 XCase 3 Queue at begining of green arrow, Qa 1.25 Queue at beginning of unsaturated green. Qu 0.80 Residual queue, Qr 0.80 Uniform Delay, dl 31.0 DELAY/LOS WORKSHEET WITH INITIAL QUEUE • Initial Dur. Uniform Delay Initial Final Initial Lane Appr/ Unmet Unmet Queue Unmet Queue Group Lane Demand Demand Unadj. Adj. Param. Demand Delay Delay Group Q veh t hrs. de dl sec u Q veh d3 sec d sec Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Submitted into the public recorg in connection with item on Lt (—aG Walter Foeman City Clerk Intersection Delay 39.2 sec/veh Intersection LOS .D HCS: Signals Release 3.1 Jackson M. Ahlstedt Jackson M. Ahlstedt, P.E. Jackson M. Ahlstedt, P.E. E)GSTING.doc 5 a-1.036 0 - 0 • • • 46 N.W. 94th Street Miami Shores, Florida 33150 Phone: (305) 754-8695 Fax: (305) 754-8695 E-Mail: Intersection: City/State. Analyst: Project No: Time Period Analyzed: Date: East/West Street Name: North/South Street Name: I Eastbound J L T R 1 Volume I PHF J PK 15 Vol 1 Hi Ln Vol i % Grade J Ideal Sat J ParkExist 1 Numpark 1 % Heavy Veh1 No. Lanes 1 0 0 0 LGConfig I Lane Width I RTOR Vol J Adj Flow 'I %InSharedLnl Prop Turns I NumPeds I NumBuS I OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS SE 7TH ST/MIAMI AVE MIAMI/FLORIDA J. AHLSTEDT BRICKELL GRAND EXIST PM PEAK HOUR 7/29/99 SE 7TH STREET MIAMI AVENUE VOLUME DATA I Westbound I Northbound 1 L T R I L T R j1053 61 1565 270 1 0.80 0.75 10.74 0.83 J 329 20 1191 81 I 0 I ( 0 J 1900 1900 11900 1900 1 IX X I 120 20 I 0 0 10 0 J 0 2 1 1 1 2 0 I T R I L LT 1 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 1 0 1 I 1316 81 1565 524 J 126 10.38 f 0 1. 1 0 0 10 0 Duration 1.00 Area Type: CBD or Similar I Eastbound I L T R I Init Unmet I Arriv. Typel Unit Est. J I Factor I Lost Time J Ext of g I Ped Min g 1 OPERATING PARAMETERS Westbound 1 Northbound L T R I L T R i a.a 0.0 10.0 0.0 3 3 13 3 3.0 3.0 13.0 3.0 1.000 1 1.000 2.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 0.0 1 0.0 PHASE DATA Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 EB Left I NB Left Thru I Thru Right J Right Peds 1 Ped WB Left I SB Left Thru P I Thru Right P I Right Peds i Ped NB Fight J EB Right EMSTING.doc 5 6 P P Southbound L T R 0 0 0 0 Southbound L T R 7 6 Submitted Into the public reco in connection with item 12 on —/ --a Walter Foeman City Clerk 11 EXHIBIT "4" Contract Purchaser PARK PLACE, L.L.C. is owned by: 1. Amkin Corporation, a Florida Corporation - 90% Jose Llorens, individually owns 100% of Amkin Corp. 2. Alan Ojeda, Individually - 10% Owner BRICKELL INVESTMENT REALTY CORP. is 100% owned by Baypoint Holdings, S.A., a Liberian corporation. Baypoint is owned as follows: 52% - GF Securities Company Limited, a Bahamian corporation 12% - Whitehunter Corporation, a Liberian. corporation • 12% - News Corporation, a Liberian corporation 12% - Victory Trust Company, a Liberian corporation 12% - First Capital Corporation, a Liberian corporation Whitehunter, News, Victory and First Capital are each owned 100% by GF Securities Guillermo Fierro, individually owns 100% of GF Securities. Submitted into the public 'Cor in Connection with 'tent on Walter Foeman City Cleric � IV U wpm I I �1�IIII :1575?PG4665 this iratn",nt was prep.r.d byt 72[-? n 717.9 P, 159? DEC 23 1306 kwwd sid c*wm to, Kitt S. 1SOMMIM, loq. Volt. tue10 Adler, Cram! A Steele, P.A. 17r itrichil AVdM*, Suits UN "a rtorid. Sul sas•sit+•aotz rot to See. 01-0209-000.10m, 01•0299.090.1090. slid. 01.0209-o90-tt20t of,! v ovo•tuo: ot•o2o9-oto-lttol ot-ozoP-a9o•ttsar of=ozco-ova•tteol ol•omv-ooc-tuar 21-om9-oai.ttml 01-awe-ow- 2010 otantN's 1.0. No. 6S 067111 THIS SPECIAL WARRANTY, DE.ED is zade this ZJU day of December, 1992, by BROVARD MANAGEMENT COMPANY, a k041 of corporation; `haraia- after called the Grantor, to BRICMLL n1VWTIE82fiT REAI&Y CORP. ,' a Florida corporation, whose post office address is C/o Elana'Mola, XcDarmott, Will t $mary, 1850 2C Street, g. W. , W hingtoia, D.C. 20006, hereinafter called the Grantee: L'V(S7?Lec SURTx ':br55U.00 r-ARSHALL AVER, CLEkh DADE COUNTYs fL WI TETB8 SETHI That. the Grantor, for and in consideration of the stun of $10.00 and other valuable considaraticn, receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, hereby grants, bargains, sails, alians, remises, releases, conveys and confirms unto the Grantee, the following described land situated in Dada County, Florida, together with all improvements located on suair land (such land and improvements being collectively referred to as the "Property")= Sea Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof. This conveyance is .made and accepted subject to zoningr restrictions, prohibitions, any special nse permit, develolmtant oY regional impact or other: requirements imposed by gavarttmental authorities (but this shall not serve to reimpose same), those matters set forth on Exhibit aB" attached hereto and made a part hereof, and taxes for the year 1993 and subsequent years. TOGETHER, with all the tanazQnts, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining.' TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the same, in fee simple forever. AND subject to the matters referred to above, Grantor hereby warrants title to said land and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons claiming by, through or under the said Grantor, but not otherwise.. Submitted into the public recor in connection with item !� on - Walter Foeman City Clerk 0 • R. f 5157n4666 Zx WZTIPS// WMU=P, Grantor has hereunto sat its hand and seal the day and year first above written. Signed; sealed and delivered in our prasdncss BR*WAitD xllUGSRSZiT CO7tPAliY, . a Florida carporat on ,W s HanBY: CK jam H. BID ► Vice President Name: <;Pf:$ R. Fj*rovvAn 101 Briakall Ave. � ;J,. •�'• 4� ' � Miami, PL 33131 j_:.,, :•' •�r STATE of FTA npL ) ) ss COUM OF DADE } The foregoing instr=ent was acknowledged before au thiuZaa .. ::. day of December, 1992 by JOR N. BLOCK as Vice President of BROWI►BA NA AaMENT Co1IPM, a Florida corporation, on behalf of the corporation, who is permanally known to me and has taken an oath. Ry Pplic. RameIt Form-e-l"Aca tor,& ' my Comm on expires: � s' i S� `tires or Volta IsnER 111 CGIM. tl(4. tAVSi a Submitted into the public rec rd in connection w4h item L on ./-/-6� Walter Foeman City Clerk 00-11 IN LE P. { 57SM466T i�sr �aW z�cal n�+ratiotion That south 1/2 of Lot 8 and Lots P through 25t both inalusiva, and Lots 17 through 25., both inoiusiv�, Bloox 99, south. AXEM= W OF B&IC$BLI,�B.AWMITMOX To TBB HAP or !QA=, according to the Platthereo f, recorded in Plat Soak •B■ at Paga 113, of thn Public Records of Dade County, Ploridn, im Lots ISA and 16B• of Vilkinson's Subdivision, according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 31, at Page 21 of the Public Record= of Dads County, Florida. • 3 11 Submitted into the public reco in connection with item on Z Walter Foeman City Cleric 0-104nu • 0 �, i{ .� >w 'L, J u • •G, i ; �41 • � •• , - i a` it .I . • •: I i il'���� i � � �11II ��:15�57'Y��668 NX=IT "ago i. Raaolutioa Ito. R•729-86 regarding the extansions,.of the . Dovntaxn Component of Utrorail proje4t filed auns, 17, 1984, in official Records Soak 12923, Page Z618: y. blomorandm regarding adoption of ordinance ;No.. 86-44 concernec ing creation of a spial Aseas0mcht, Projoat Area 'tor the x8tromovor Stage Z Completion o=i and 8rickall $xtanxions June 17, 1986, in official Records Book 12923,' Page 2622 3. Stipulation of Settlement filed Only 18, 1988, In Official Records Book 13752, Paga 1107. 4. Resolution No. R-987-89 regarding a Special Assaamnant. Project Arm filed September 19, 1989, in Official Records Book 14258, Page 2399. 5. Dedication of all streets and highways to the perpetual use of the public as Shawn on the Plat, Plat Sook B, page 113. 6. Resolution JTo. R-697-90 regarding a Spacial Asses=4Mt Project area, filed August 1, 1990, in Official Records Book 14646, page 2513. 7. Righto of tenants in possession under unrecorded lQases. ALL IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OP DADS COMITY, FZ=DA.. 12Lt11a5i V �f�J�11070•lY.D® IEs�l2•Y2.9¢�2tf4 4 R mma be OFF Ida1 are"Ps 800' Ot DAMI CG—t'-MO'•0A Coco" red, 10k al Cua1G S Cady Courts Submitted into the public record in connection with itemPZ l on!•=� Walter Foeman City Clerk 0-111 U'56 01/03/200.0 * * * PUBLIC VALUE INQUIRY * * * PTXM018E ® FOLIO 01 0209 090 1080 PROP ADDR 1432 BRICKELL AVE MCD 0101 NAME AND LEGAL VALUE HISTORY BRICKELL INVESTMENT REALTY CORP YEAR 1998 1999 01/01/2000 01 RUBEN GOMEZ LAND 545240 749705 1432 BRICKELL AVE BLDG 1000 1000 MIAMI FL MARKET 546240 750705 E 331313406 MARY BRICKELLS ADDN PE B-113 ASSESS 546240 750705 LOT 9 & S1/2 LOT 8 BLK 99 HEX OR 15757-4665 1292 2 WVD TOT EX TAXABLE 546240 750705 STATE EXEMPT: SALE DATE 12/1992 SALE AMT 5900000 SALE TYPE 2 I/V I SALE O/R 15757-4665 PF1-MORE LEGAL PF2-PARCEL INFO PF3-FOL SRCH PF5-TAX COLL PF7-PREV OWNER PF8-MENU PF13-OCCUP LIC 0 Submitted into the public 110 g inconnectionwith 1 item - on Walter Foeman 01/03/2000 * * * PUBLIC VALUE INQUIRY * * * PTXM0186 . FOLIO 01 0209 090 1090 PROP ADDR 1438 BRICKELL AVE MCD 0101 NAME AND LEGAL VALUE HISTORY BRICKELL INVESTMENT.REALTY CORP YEAR 1998 1999 01/01/2000 01 ELENA MOLA LAND 545240 749705 1850 K ST NW BLDG 1000 1000 WASHINGTON DC MARKET 546240 750705 E 20006 MARY BRICKELLS ADDN PB B-113 ASSESS 546240 750705 LOT 10 & N1/2 LOT 11 BLK 99 HEX OR 15757-4665 1292 2 WVD TOT EX TAXABLE 546240 750705 STATE EXEMPT: SALE DATE 12/1992 SALE AMT 59000,00 SALE TYPE 2 I/V I SALE O/R 15757-4665 PF1-MORE LEGAL PF2-PARCEL INFO PF3-FOL SRCH PF5-TAX COLL PF7-PREV OWNER PF8-MENL PF13-OCCUP LIC • Submitted into the public record in cOnn�timn wrh it itern on aD� 'at�y_-r Foeman cay Clerk 0 0 — 1 0 01/03/2000 * * * PUBLIC VALUE INQUIRY * * * PTXM0186 i FOLIO 01 0209 090 1100 PROP ADDR 1440 BRICKELL AVE MCD 0101 NAME AND LEGAL VALUE HISTORY BRICKELL INVESTMENT REALTY CORP YEAR 1998 1999 01/01/2000 ELENA MOLA LAND 545240 749705 1850 K ST NW BLDG 1000 1000 WASHINGTON DC. MARKET 546240 750705 E 20006 MARY BRICKELLS ADDN PE B-113 ASSESS 546240 750705 S1/2 LOT 11 & 12 BLK 99 HEX OR 15757-4665 1292 2 WVD TOT EX TAXABLE 546240 750705 STATE EXEMPT: SALE DATE 12/1992 SALE AMT 5900000 SALE TYPE 2 I/V I SALE O/R 15757-4665 PF1-MORE LEGAL P72-PARCEL INFO PF3-FOL SRCH PF5-TAX COLL PF7-PREV OWNER PF8-MENU PF13-OCCUP LIC r Submitted into the public recor in connection with item on Wetter Foeman city cwt 00--16906 01/03/2000 * * * PUBLIC VALUE INQUIRY * * * PTXM0186 FOLIO 01 0209 090 1110 PROP ADDR 1450'BRICKELL AVE MCD 0101 NAME AND LEGAL VALUE HISTORY BRICKELL INVESTMENT REALTY CORP YEAR 1998 1999 01/01/2000 % ELENA MOLA LAND 545240 749705 1850 K ST NW BLDG WASHINGTON DC MARKET 545240 749705 E 20006 =--=---------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------- MARY BRICKELLS ADDN PE -113 ASSESS 545240 749705 LOT 13 & N 1/2 LOT 14 BLK 99 HEX OR 15757-4665 1292 2 WVD TOT EX TAXABLE 545240 749705 STATE EXEMPT: SALE DATE 12/1992 SALE AMT 5900000 SALE TYPE 2 I/V V SALE O/R 15757-4665 PF1-MORE LEGAL PF2-PARCEL INFO PF3-FOL SRCH PF5-TAX COLL PF7-PREV OWNER PF8-MENU PF13-OCCUP LIC r Submitted into the public recor in connection with item on Walter Foeman City clerk, 01/03/2000 * * * PUBLIC VALUE INQUIRY * * * PTXM018E FOLIO 01 0209 090 1120 PROP ADDR 1460 BRICKELL AVE MCD 0101 NAME AND LEGAL VALUE HISTORY BRICKELL INVESTMENT REALTY CORP YEAR 1998 1999 01/01/2000 01 ELENA MOLA LAND 629720 865865 1850 K ST NW BLDG 1000 1000 WASHINGTON DC MARKET 630720 866865 E 20006 MARK BRICKELLS ADDN PB B-113 ASSESS 630720 866865 LOT 15 & PORT OF LOT 14 BLK 99 HEX DESC INDB 3523-160 WVD LOT SIZE IRREGULAR TOT EX OR 15757-4665 1292 2 TAXABLE 630720 866865 STATE EXEMPT: SALE DATE 12/1992 SALE AMT 5900000 SALE TYPE 2 I/V I SALE O/R 15757-466E PF1-MORE LEGAL PF2-PARCEL INFO PF3-FOL SRCH PF5-TAX COLL PF7-PREY OWNER PF8-MENC PF13-OCCUP LIC • Submitted into the public recor in connection with item on —1 G --ad Walter Foreman Cit`j Cleric Ira 01/03/2000 * * * PUBLIC VALUE INQUIRY * * * PTXM018E FOLIO 01 0209, 090 1130 PROP ADDR 1485 S MIAMI AVE MCD 0101 NAME AND LEGAL VALUE HISTORY BRICKELL INVESTMENT REALTY CORP YEAR 1998 1999 01/01/2000 ELENA MOLA LAND 600000 825000 1850 K ST NW BLDG 1000 1000 WASHINGTON DC MARKET 601000 826000 E 20006 MARY BRICKELLS ADDN PB B-113 ASSESS 601000 826000 LOTS 17 & 18 BLK 99 HEX OR 15757-4665 1292 2 WVD TOT EX TAXABLE 601000 826000 STATE EXEMPT: SALE DATE 12/1992 SALE AMT 5900000 SALE TYPE 2 I/V I SALE O/R 15757-4665 PF1-MORE LEGAL PF2-PARCEL INFO PF3-FOL SRCH PF5-TAX COLL PF7-PREV OWNER PF8-MEN: PF13-OCCUP LIC • • Submitted into the public record n connection with item I `Ion Walter Foeman Citv Clerk 0-100 01/03/2000 * * * PUBLIC VALUE INQUIRY * * * PTXM018t FOLIO 01 0209 090 1140 PROP ADDR 1475-1477 S MIAMI AVE MCD 0101 NAME AND LEGAL VALUE HISTORY BRICKELL INVESTMENT REALTY CORP YEAR 1998 1999 01/01/2000 . ELENA MOLA LAND 300000 412500 1850 K ST NW BLDG 1000 1000 WASHINGTON DC MARKET 301000 413500 E 20006 ==---------------------- ------------------ MARY BRICKELLS ADDN PE B-113 .ASSESS 301000 413500 LOT 19 ELK 99 HEX LOT SIZE 50.000 X 150 WVD OR 15757-4665 1292 2 TOT EX TAXABLE 301000 413500 STATE EXEMPT: SALE DATE 12/1992 SALE AMT 5900000 SALE TYPE 2 I/V I SALE O/R 15757-4665 PF1-MORE LEGAL PF2-PARCEL INFO PF3-FOL SRCH PF5-TAX COLL PF7-PREV OWNER PF8=MENC PF13-OCCUP LIC • • Submitted into the public recol wi in connOCtion tP item /� on Z / A6' Waltor FoemQn Citi, Cler" 1. O1/03/2000 * * * PUBLIC VALUE INQUIRY * *. * PTXM018t FOLIO 01 0209 090 1150 PROP ADDR 1465 S MIAMI AVE MCD 0101 NAME AND LEGAL VALUE HISTORY BRICKELL INVESTMENT REALTY CORP YEAR 1998 1999 01/01/2000 ELENA MOLA LAND 450000 618750 1850 K ST NW BLDG 153436 159866 WASHINGTON DC MARKET 603436 778616 E 20006 MARY BRICKELLS ADDN PB B-113 ASSESS 603436 778616 LOT 20 & S1/2 LOT 21 BLK 99 HEX LOT SIZE 75.000 X 150 WVD OR 15757-4665 1292 2 TOT EX TAXABLE 603436 778616 STATE EXEMPT: SALE DATE 12/1992 SALE AMT 5900000 SALE TYPE 2 I/V I SALE O/R 15757-466'E PF1-MORE LEGAL PF2-PARCEL INFO PF3-FOL SRCH PF5-TAX COLL PF7-PREV OWNER PF8-MEN: PF13-OCCUP LIC • Submitted into the public record in connection with itemon I-L&_--rj_v Walter Fceman . 01/03/2000 * * * PUBLIC VALUE INQUIRY * * * PTXM018E FOLIO 01 0209 090 1160 PROP ADDR 1451-1453-1455 S MIAMI AVE MCD 0101 NAME AND LEGAL VALUE HISTORY BRICKELL INVESTMENT REALTY CORP YEAR 1998 1999 01/01/2000 o ELENA MOLA LAND 450000 618750 1850 K ST NW BLDG 1000 1000 WASHINGTON DC MARKET 451000 619750' E 20006 MARY BRICKELLS ADDN PB B-113 ASSESS 451000 619750 LOT 22 & N1/2 LOT 21 BLK 99 HEX LOT SIZE 75.000 X 150 WVD OR 15757-4665 1292 2 TOT EX TAXABLE 451000 619750 STATE EXEMPT: SALE DATE 12/1992 SALE AMT 5900000 SALE TYPE 2 I/V I SALE O/R 15757-4665 PF1-MORE LEGAL PF2-PARCEL INFO PF3-FOL SRCH PF5-TAX COLL PF7-PREY OWNER PF8-MENU PF13-OCCUP LIC 0 Submitted into the public rec A in connection with ite—f y on .LI /C Q- Walter Foeman City Cleric 00-10R 01/03/2000 * * * PUBLIC VALUE INQUIRY * * * PTXM018E FOLIO 01 0209 090 1170 PROP ADDR 1443 S MIAMI AVE MCD 0101 NAME AND LEGAL VALUE HISTORY BRICKELL INVESTMENT REALTY CORP YEAR 1998 1999 01/01/2000 o ELENA MOLA LAND 300000 412500 1850 K ST NW BLDG 1000 1000 WASHINGTON DC MARKET 301000 413500 E 20006 MARY BRICKELLS ADDN PB B-113 ASSESS 301000 413500 LOT 23 ELK 99 HEX LOT SIZE 50.000 X 150 WVD OR 15757-4665 1292 2 TOT EX TAXABLE 301000 413500 STATE EXEMPT: SALE DATE 12/1992 SALE AMT 5900000 SALE TYPE 2 I/V I SALE O/R 15757-4665 PFI-MORE LEGAL PF2-PARCEL INFO PF3-FOL SRCH PF5-TAX COLL PF7-PREV OWNER PF8-MENU PF13-OCCUP LIC 1] Submitted Into the public record in connection with item Y on .Ll_L-gcj Walter Foeman City Clerk • 01/03/2000 * * * PUBLIC VALUE INQUIRY * * * PTXM018i FOLIO 01 0209 090 1180 PROP ADDR 1435 S MIAMI AVE MCD 0101 NAME AND LEGAL VALUE HISTORY BRICKELL INVESTMENT REALTY CORP YEAR 1998 1999 01/01/2000 ELENA MOLA LAND 520000 715000 1850 K. ST NW BLDG 1000 1000 WASHINGTON DC MARKET 521000 716000 E 20006 MARY BRICKELLS ADDN PB B-113 ASSESS 521000 716000 LOTS 24 & 25 BLK 99 HEX LOT SIZE 100.000 X 130 WVD OR 15757-4665 1292 2 TOT EX TAXABLE 521000 716000 STATE EXEMPT: SALE DATE 12/1992 SALE AMT 5900000 SALE TYPE 2 I/V I SALE O/R 15757-466:5 PF1-MORE. LEGAL PF2-PARCEL INFO PF3-FOL SRCH PF5-TAX COLL PF7-PREV OWNER PF8-MENU PF13-OCCUP LIC 0. Submitted into the pcblio recor Lin connection with item CI on Walter Foeman City Clerk • U 01/03/2000 * * * PUBLIC VALUE INQUIRY * * * PTXM018 FOLIO 01 0209 090 2010 PROP ADDR 1 SE 15 RD MCD 0101 NAME AND LEGAL VALUE HISTORY BRICKELL INVESTMENT REALTY CORP YEAR 1998 1999 01/01/2000 01 ELENA MOLA LAND 377055 592515 1850 K ST NW BLDG 1000 1000 WASHINGTON DC MARKET 378055 593515 E 20006 WILKINSONS SUB PB 51-21 ASSESS 378055 593515 LOTS 16-A & 16-B ELK 99-S HEX LOT SIZE 71.820 X 150 WVD OR 15757-4665 1292-2 TOT EX TAXABLE 378055 593515 STATE EXEMPT: SALE DATE 12/1992 SALE AMT 5900000 SALE TYPE 2 I/V I SALE O/R 15757-466. PF1-MORE LEGAL PF2-PARCEL INFO PF3-FOL SRCH PF5-TAX COLL PF7-PREY OWNER PF8-MEN PF13-OCCUP LIC *-I Submitted into the public • recogLin connection with item 2--�—ILL on j/ Walter Foeman City Clerk E • Dppartment of Otatr I certify the attached is a true and correct copy of the Articles of Incorporation, as amended to date, of BRICKELL INVESTMENT REALTY CORP., a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Florida, as shown by the records of this office. The document number of this corporation is V35186. CR2EO22 (1-99) Given under my hand and the Great Seal of the State of Florida at Tallahassee, the Capitol, this the Seventeenth day of March, 2000 rhitted into the public rd in connection with k��ja"7-5 on Walter FoernanzztrjerirteParris city Cle&. o errrtztr of ;tnte 06-1036 �J Af ;,tatip, 0�iaa Bppartmpnt of 0§tatr I certify from the records of this office that BRICKELL INVESTMENT REALTY CORP., is a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Florida, filed on May 11, 1992. The document number of this corporation is V35186. I further certify that said corporation has paid all fees due this office through December 31, 1999, that its most recent annual report was filed on April 14, 1999, and its status is active. I further certify that said corporation has not filed Articles of Dissolution. CR2EO22 (1-99) . Given under my hand and the Great Seal of the State of Florida at Tallahassee, the Capitol, this the Seventeenth day of March, 2000 ito the public )nnecti n with on I Lr G_/-(W- Walter Foernanat�jEliTiEttrris City Clerk cn ct�r of trzt> 0®--1036 w�+"rP"fry°'xYa.�'�i . + t��.,n 7 ?y"� } a`7 ��7i+7i"'"b��s `C. Y a Li r �' • s �, r5.. i;W r,� Q, �rd�gyi' �S.c 4NE W.y, L,C� mac, : •.. �, roi.x '- ✓ S'Gu i m..a�+j z . % s. t , 3k FILED 92I',A1 14 Pu to 1 ARTICLES OF. INCORPORATION OF }: BRICKELL INVESTMENT REALTY CORP. The undersigned incorporator hereby forms a 'corporation under Chapte11 r 607 of tho laws of the State of Florida. ARTICLE I. NkME The name of the corporation shall bet BRICKELL INVESTMENT REALTY CORP. The address of the principal office of this corporation shall be c/o Elena C. Mola, McDermott, Will & Emery, 201 South Biscayne Boulevard, Suite 2200, Miami, Florida 33131, and the mailing address shall be the same. ARTICLE II. NATURE OF BUSINESS This corporation may engage or transact in any or all lawful activities or business permitted under the laws of the United States, the State of Florida or any other state, country, territory or nation. V E cu ARTICLE III. CAPITAL STOCK Q- �+ C C The maximum number of shares of stock that this., U ,o corporation is authorized to have outstanding at any 4- c o one time is 10,000 shares of common stock having $.01.0 v C par value per share. .2 d Submitted into the public E recor . in connect'on with f 7 r o� .ri 'L^`- v'. _,....'�?x4.6. ....✓_._v.��" SJv :.'zC"y.r .,, -„Ssk+�.z_S!r � .�'< +�R�'�.�-r . �4�,w Yid``;- "a' v,.c. yy w w• � i -f$�c =-,'a1 ` �l fir^ a a7 '�3J} n' i' x,.x. q ?rlpls�r ,2tia:1iP��» , rry ARTICLE IV. ADDRESS s,z�, }q „�`� _ The street address of the initial registered office of the corporation shall' be 1201 Hays ,Street, 'a^ Tallahassee, Florida 32301 and the name of the initial �> registered agent of.the corporation at that address is Corporation Information Services, Inc. ARTICLE V.''TERM OF EXISTENCE This corporation is to exist perpetually. ARTICLE VI. PREEMPTIVE RIGHTS The corporation elects to have preemptive rights. ARTICLE VII. INCORPORATOR The name and street address of the incorporator to ,,r ,a these Articles of Incorporation is: Corporation Information Services, Inc. 1201 Hays Street Tallahassee, Florida 32301 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned agent of Corporation Information Services, Inc., has hereunto set their hand and seal of Corporation Information Services, Inc., on this llth day of May, 1992. CORPORATION INFORMATION SERVICES, INC. t - r Bys Its 'Agent, Gail Shelby submitted into the public rec gd in connection with Ater .� on /1=.-va Walter Foeman City Clerk - 1,5'!1Y ,:, ., � _` fV` IN AXTICLES OF.INC INCORPORATION 94 MAY., I 17 Cor oration Informa 0 p n Services nC., a Florida corporation authorized to, transact; business An- -hi L State,: having a,business.-office ..identical vIAN. thij 1DA -registered office;; of ��-.the corporation, named. above and been designa e .-'&$'.the Regist6red A gent`in t' a h a v i n g d above and foregoing'Aiticles",is;familiar with.and accepts the obligations.,of the position of Registered Agent under Section 607.0505, Florida Statutes. 4 ,U CORPORATION INFORMATION SERVICES INC. Z B Y Itsgent, Ga Shelby /X Submitted into 0 the Publicitem rj inconnection with on Walter F06man CRY Clerk 0 • 0- J F/ ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT99 TO 5��. 16 ARTICLES OF INCORPORA i OF �SS VA /a BRICEELL INVESTMENT REALTY CORP. F(1�4 Pursuant to the provisions of section 607.1006, Florida Statutes, this Florida profit corporation adopts the following articles of amendment to its articles of incorporation: FIRST: Article M. Capital Stock is amended to read as follows: The maximum number of shares of stock that this corporation is authorized to have outstanding at any one time is 20,000 shares of common stock.having $.01 par value per share. SECOND: Amended March 8, 1999. THIRD: The amendment was approved by Baypoint Holdings S.A., the sole shareholder of the Corporation. The number of votes cast for the amendment were sufficient for approval. vv� Sign a Name: avier Aguirre Title: President Submitted into the public record in- connection item %.— Frith on -t-/ Walter FOen?.an Citv Clerk • • • :43pparttunt of ikatr I certify from the records of this office that PARK PLACE LLC, is a limited liability company organized under the laws of the State of Florida, filed on January 18, 2000. The document number of this company is 1-00000000614. I further certify that said company has paid all fees due this office through December 31, 2000, and its status is active. CR2EO22 (1-99) Given under my hand and the Great Seal of the State of Florida at Tallahassee, the Capitol, this the Seventeenth day of March, 2000 Submitted into the public reco d in connection with ✓��� 1Z�s iteni� on 1 t Walter i=oeman �Rafljeriiie Harris City Clerk P- vrrctnrij of-ikate 00-1036 • Drpartmrnt of itlxtr I certify the attached is a true and correct copy of Articles of Organization of PARK PLACE LLC, a limited liability company, organized under the laws of the State of Florida, filed on January 18, 2000, as shown by the records of this office. The document number of this company is 1-00000000614. CR2EO22 (1-99) Given under my hand and the Great Seal of the State of Florida at Tallahassee, the Capitol, this the Seventeenth day of March, 2000 Submitted into the public recor in connection with item on //_/6�a Waiter Foernan City Clerk Rath erirt>r Parris �ecrrtarg nf�tate E • 0 ARTICLES OF ORGANIZATION OF PARK PLACE LLC SMy The name of the Limited Liability Company is PARK PLACE LLC (the "Company'). The mailing address and street address of the principal office of the Company is: c/o Rilea Group, Inc., 848 Brickell Avenue, Suite 1010, Miami, Florida 33131. - ARTICLE III- Registered Agent and Office The street address of the Company's initial registered office is c/o Greenberg Traurig, P.A. 1221 Brickell Avenue, Miami, Florida 33131, and the name of its initial registered agent at such office is Nancy B. Lash, Esq. The undersigned, having been named as the Registered Agent to accept service of process for the Company at the place designated herein, hereby accepts such appointment and agrees designation and is familiar with, and accepts, the obligations of such position, as provided in Florida Statutes §608.415. min o GREENBERG TRAURIG, P.A. -- c 1 p C— By: 1AIIA-1 ;> Name. Nanc B. Lash Dated: January 14, 2000 RTICLE IV - Management m 3� The Company will be managed by one or more managers and is therefore, a manager - managed company. The Manager(s) shall be selected by the members in the manner prescribed by and provided for in the Operating Agreement. MIAMI/HERNANDEZJ/1094 M/ngsp0l !.DOGI/14/00 0— �, Z; � id" Nancy' ( Lash, Authorized Representative (In accordance with section 608.408(3), Florida Statutes, the execution of this document constitutes an affhmaiion under the penalties ofpedury that the facts stated herein are true) Submitted into the public record in connection with item on f f Walter Foeman Ci� 'I Clerk ® BRICKELL INVESTMENT REALTY CORP. April 13, 2000 Adrienne Pardo, Esq. Greenberg Traurig, P.A. 1221 Brickell Avenue Miami, FL 33131 Re: Major Use Special Permit and alley closure applications for property located at Brickell Avenue, S.E. 15th Street and South Miami Avenue, Miami, Florida Dear Ms. Pardo: This letter serves to advise you that Greenberg Traurig, P.A. on behalf of Park Place, LLC, the proposed purchaser of the property, has the authority to file an alley closure application and Major Use Special Permit application for three residential buildings with 91-6--units-for the property located at Brickell Avenue, S.E. 15th Street and South Miami Avenue. It is our understanding that Park Place, LLC, will be paying for all application fees, as well as for all legal fees earned by Greenberg Traurig and that Brickell Investment Realty Corp., will not be responsible for any costs or fees to Greenberg Traurig. Very truly yours, a; I Brickell Inves ment Realty Corp. Submitted into the public recO4 in connection with ® item on Walter Foeman City Clerk 00 -10$6 CONSUELO M. QUINTANA REAL ESTATE DATA RESEARCHER 1111 SW 11th Avenue, Miami, FL 33129-1820 OFC # 305-858-2287 FAX # 305-859-2439 MAY 29, 2000 CITY OF MIAMI PLANNING & ZONING BOARD ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT P.O. BOX 330708 MIAMI, FL 33133 RE: PROPERTY OWNERSHIP LIST 375'FT • FROM: (SEE MAP ATTACHED) MIAMI, FL (STREET ADDRESS) S112 OF LOT 8, & LOTS 9 THRU 15, & LOTS 17 THRU 25, BLOCK 99S AMENDED MAP OF BRICKELL'S ADDN TO THE CITY OF MIAMI SOUTH PLAT BOOK B-113 (AND) LOTS 16A & 16B WILKINSON'S SUBDIVISION PLAT BOOK 51-21 SECTION 33, TNSHP 54S, RANGE 41E (LEGAL DESCRIPTION) DADE COUNTY FLORIDA. CL o U D L2 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE ATTACHED OWNERSHIP LIST, MAP AND MAILING MATRIX IS A COMPLETE AND ACCURATE REPRESENTATION OF THE REAL.. _ . c. o ESTATE PROPERTY AND PROPERTY OWNERS 3751FT FROM THE SUBJECT PROPERTY LISTED ABOVE. THIS REFLECTS THE MOST CURRENT RECORDS ON c Q FILE IN THE DADE COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S OFFICE. SINCERELY, 0 cn�a' ONSUELO M. QUI TANA r^n (37 LABELS) (MIA-2197)(L-629) (INV-2287) `�% • L-629L (37 LABELS WITHOUT REPETITION) (ORIGINALLY 58 NAMES) RICHARD OCCONNELL TR HELM BANK HAROLD & S SAWELSON % TRANSAL CORP 1200 BRICKELL AVE #310 1450 S MIA AVE 2121 SW 3 AVE 8TH FL MIA FL 33131 MIA FL 33130 MIAMI FL 33129 THE TAPLIN CO LTD DAVID W SIME N & V GOESEKE 1177 KANE CONCOURSE PO BOX 3108 J & A CERVERA BAY HARBOR ISL FL 33154 MIA FL 33245 1492 S MIA AVE MIA FL 33130 PHOENIX INV CO LE UNITED NATL BANK PROVOST & PARTNERS INC REM RICHARD OCONNELL TR 1399 SW 1ST AVE 75 SW 15TH RD 2121 SW 3 AVE 8FL MIA FL 33130 MIA FL 33129 MIAMI FL 33129 RICHARD OCONNELL GLINN RATINER & P A PHILIP & J SCHRAEDEL % TRANSAL CORP 60 SW 13TH ST ANN S HAFF 2121 SW 3 AVE 8FL MIA FL 33130 41 SW 15TH RD MIAMI FL 33129 MIA FL 33129 TIGERVEST NV/CR % D & T HELM BANK THOMAS J BAKER % DELIOTTE & TOUCHE LL 1312 S MIA AVE 1501 S MIA AVE 201 E KENNEDY BLVD #700 MIA FL 33130 MIA FL 33129 TAMPA FL 33602 PACIFIC NATL BK NA 14TH BRICKELL W LTD 1550 BRICKELL ASSOC 1390 BRICKELL AVE 1177 KANE CONCOURSE 9100 S DADELAND BLVD MIA FL 33131 BAY HARBOR ISL FL 33154 MIA FL 33156 TIGERVEST NV/CR 14TH BRICKELL W LTD t% c: 1�C LUPETTO INC co SMITH ORTIZ GOMEZ 1177 KANE CONCOURSE 200 S BISC BLVD #481 ( E U 132 MINORCA AVE C GABLES FL 33134 #201 MIA FL 33131 CL c O BAY HARBOR ISL FL 33154 O u TIGERVEST NV/CR TOM & M J PENNEKAMP O O EVERETT V SUGARBAK % DELOITTE & TOUCHE 1434 S MIA AVE CR 1500 BRICKELL AVE 201 E KENNEDY BLVD #700 MIA FL 33130 MIAMI FL 33129 TAMPA FL 33602 = �y E HELM BANK % CONTROLLER 1312 S MIA AVE MARY J PENNEKAMP/TR O CITY OF MIA DEPT 05 a) 6710 S LE JEUNE RD P & D DIV ASSET MGZ MIA FL 33130 C GABLES F . 33146 444 NW 2ND AVE #325 MIA FL 33130 HB&SPC INC TOM & M J PENNEKAMP E S PROPERTIES INC 1200 BRICKELL AVE #305 1430 S MIA AVE 1395 BRICKELL AA (� MIA FL 33131 MIA FL 33130 MIA FL 33131 tJ 103 El L-629L AMER VENT PROP FUND & BLUMBERG BRICKELL LTD 255 ALHAMBRA CIR #1100 C GABLES FL 33134 COSTA BELLA CONDO CONDO ASSOC 1450 BRICKELL BAY DR MIA FL 33131 BRICKELL EAST CONDO ASSC 151 SE 15TH RD MIAMI FL 33129 REPUBLIC INTL BK OF NY 1451 BRICKELL AVE MIAMI FL 33131 TERREMARK BRICKELL II LTD 2601 S BAYSHORE DR #1600 MIA FL 33133 DIOCESE OF NEWTON FOR THE MELKITES IN THE USA INC 1501 BRICKELL AVE MIAMI FL 33129 THE PALACE CONDO CONDO ASSOC 1541 BRICKELL AVE MIAMI FL 33129 El Submitted into the public recor in connection with item — on Walter Foeman City Clerk 2 C=i�''��rRC;''P WS ,.,, •"sue•, 1 ----+r. �a 'rya„ �"`�•_ .n t ( S �s5 $ ( :. { ` a S ( -4 .�% /i 1 pit .. j �l:F-..-b• A ,{� q ,a j/ S '-' -� 2 it ! _ ._..J.—L.�'-•-l�i`���lJ---i1L- �" "�e�''��`�."a�si'. ""'°„Aa.-,�� • � �j •w.•�."_`-.,,--...,,_j I -K. 57' a�;: 41 HIJ , T yet fir._ ?� _ R 3 p r `.j.,._ f l �"�:•L_. b. L�--- ;._t _ �i �. ?�mC.�rf f •f at �•• : _ f^=- t ' 4fY ''`- ._ - rc� �1 1 �` ` -s7p ,T r� ."�' ry -_� ..1 ( -•"_`{ s,'Iir tg , �'' : t ' IT. r a "s c ; t'! ! Ir, —. ;Al�_�_j_Id j. rl , .. , l i i� � "� � ��`kj� {1'LJ�, t �`�� �, � � �"�=.`�.. `� _ i' � �.:''�JJ i'{1� rT " "��`'Zl t �'•'� ` ` r P a S.` �:`llAc �, N 1' ��� � 1;_, Srl .�;'f-�;�;a `�`•� sl ""�-�...t(` a 1 p ..-..., t ',' i ''i� ., -i i,_,.._r` ,c�� ry -'. i_.:' y _ i� _ x1`'-`°'�;i*m;-"•��- •t �a/i' j' r Sr�y;i i •!� i t, t 5a 1 li' /rl of SL 1. ...y - j- o w 1 it t•—a' �� 7i .`.1 ,^ �` f, ��' � s xc r ; '.�i rII �1��� f3��� " j"'~�*^�-�"•..-.:..: :r --' - r3•'?. 234 ~�O �F' 9 �,�• -"� - _ "�\-(t �� £ : 1 �3 --b� J4 nr�, , �` i,\\ � I i tj'i • 1 J f'' � '''' t' F p °r�� �-^---. l 01? STA Src Lt t'Y✓, .a 'Pi1 Spa DGlre.i.Crrck71 �-:i+ --l:,C \; •� �:. �. '_. `�\• �,,•�•t;' °y c ^r��(K77-14) �3 ,i / 3 ' •; �\ \a�N � \\ `i i �. H~ f 4Q `yea/ a� y- �Q• `\\ \ �\ \\�! r'J•i`- � �pF'^. a Ta may/'. / . ,6r �;='1 '\ '\ 4r�af 1-' \ \ ,•"\ '� f f 1C' > QLI.. ^N•ai .�-,r. g..� �g i VIZCAYR Sli�iYi�.d into tli�. {, t EIORTH l - r . �4 ^ public reco •n connection ,v � \y \.\. �3> •.� \ -.�_ � �' �� � �� with r�. item �L \ \ Walter Foeman City Clerk • • • • SB Right Green 36.0 Yellow 4.0 All Red 1.0 Cycle Length: 80.0 0 I Submitted into the Public WB Right record in connection with Item 1'` �— 35 . Don 4.0 Walter Foeman City Clerk secs VOLUME ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET Adjusted Prop. Prop. Appr./ Mvt Movement Volume PHF Flow No. Lane Rate Lanes Group RTOR Floes Rate In Lane Grp Left Right Turns Turns Eastbound Left 0 Thru. 0 Right 0 Westbound Left 0 Thru 1053 0.80 1316 2 T 1316 Right 61 0.75 61 1 R 0 81 Northbound Left 565 0.74 764 1 L 565 Thru 270 0.83 325 2 LT 524 0.38 Right 0 Southbound Left 0 Thru 0 Right 0 +� Value entered by user. SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET - Appr/ Ideal Adj Lane Sat f f f f f f f f f Sat Group Flow W HV G P BB A LU RT LT Flow Eastbound Sec LT Adj/LT Sat: Westbound Sec LT Adj/LT Sat: T 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.90 0.95 1.000 1.000 3249 R 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.90 1.00 0.850 ---- 1454 Northbound Sec LT Adj/LT Sat: L 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.800 1.000 0.90 1.00 ---- 0.950 1300 LT 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.900 1.D00 0.90 0.95 1.000 0.981 2870 Southbound Sec LT Adj/LT Sat: CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Adj Adj Sat Flow Green --Lane Group-- Appr/ Lane Flow Rate Flow Rate Ratio Ratio Capacity v/c Mvmt Group (v) (s) (v/s) (g/C) (c) Ratio EXISTING.doc 7 Eastbound submitted into the public Pri. r@CO , in connection Sec. item Z-- �- with l Left ---L_ on J_%_ Thru Right Walter Foeman Right Westbound C►tY Clerk Pri. Sec. Left Thru T 1316 3249 # 9.41 0.450 1462 D.90 Right R 81 1454 0.06 0.450 654 0.12 Northbound Pri. Sec. Left L 565 1300 # 0.43 0.438 569 0.99 Thru LT 524 2670 0.18 G.438 1256 0.42 Right Southbound Pri. Sec. Left Thru Right Sum (v/s) critical = 0.84 Lost Time/Cycle, L 8.00 sec Critical v/c(X) = 1.10 LEVEL OF SERVICE WORFSKEET Appr/ Ratios Unf Prog Lane Incremental Res Lane Group Approach Lane Del Adj Grp Factor Del Del • Grp v/c g/C dl Fact Cap k d2 d3 Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound Westbound T 0.90 0.450 20.3 1.000 1462 0.50 10.5 0.0 30.8 C 30.6 C R 0.12 0.450 12.8 1.000 654 0.50 0.4 0.0 13.2 B Northbound L 0.99 0.438 22.4 1.000 569 0.50 69.1 0.0 91.5 F LT 0.42 0.433 15.5 1.000 1256 0.50 1.0 0.0 16.5 B 55.4 E Southbound Intersection Delay = 41.0 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = D HCS: Signals Release 3.1 Submitted Into the public record in connection with Jackson M. Ahlstedt item on Jackson M. Ahlstedt, P.E. VValterFoeman Jackson M. Ahlstedt, P.E. 46 N.W. 94th Street City Clerk Miami Shores. Florida 33150 Phone: (305) 754-8695 E-Mail: EMSTING.doc Fag: (305) 754-8695 8 OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Intersection: SE BTH ST/BRICRELL AVE City/State: MIAMI/FLORIDA Analyst: J. AHLSTEDT Project No: BRICRELL GRAND Time Period Analyzed: EXIST PM PEAR HOUR Date: 7/29/99 East/West Street Name: SE 8TH STREET North/South Street Name: BRICRELL AVENUE VOLUME DATA ( Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound ( Southbound I L T R I L T R I L T R 1 L T R Volume 1396 277 203 1399 0 643 I 1739 260 1284 1263 PHF 10.83 0.80 0.64 10.90 0.90 0.94 1 0.93 0.84 10.66 0.88 1 PR 15 Vol 1119 87 79 1111 171 1 467 77 183 359 I Hi Ln Vol i i i I I % Grade 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 i Ideal Sat 11900 1900 11900 1900 1900 1 1900 1900 11900 1900 J ParkExist I I I I I NumPark % Heavy Vehi2 2 2 12 0 2 1 2 2 J2 2 j No. Lanes 2 2 0 1 1 1 1 I 0 2 1 1 2 3 0 1 LGConfig I L TR I L LTR R I T R I L T I -Lane Width 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 1 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 I RTOR Vol Adj Flow 1477 346 1443 0 1 1870 1330 1435 i %InSharedLnl 10 0 1 1 I Prop Turns I I I I I NumPeds I 50 I 50 1 50 1 1 NumBus 10 0 10 0 0 1 0 0 10 0 1 Duration 1.00 Area Type: CBD or Similar OPERATING PARAMETERS I Eastbound i Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I 1 L T R 1 L T R I L T R 1 L T R 1 Init Unmet 10.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 j 0.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 j Arriv. Type13. 3 13 3 3 1 3 3 13 3 I Unit Ext. 13.0 3.0 13.0 3.0 3.0 1 3.0 3.0 13.0 3.0 I I Factor 1 1.000 1 1.000 1 1.000 1 1.000 Lost Time 12.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 2.0 1 2.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 I Ext of g 12.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 2.0 1 2.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 I Ped Min g 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 I PHASE DATA Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A I NB Left Thru A I Thru P Right A I Right P Peds 1 Ped WB Left Submitted into the public A A I SB I Left Thru A A P cOfo-in connection With Right A I Right ltePil ! / / pn Peds I Ped G_:dC/_ Walter FOeman NB Right I EB Right City Clerk SB Right I WB Right • I Green 24.0 10.0 8.0 55.0 EMSTING.doc 9 00- I IV" 26 Yellow 4.0 4.0 3.0 4.0 All Red 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 Cycle Length: 115.0 secs VOLUME ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET Adjusted Prop. Prop. Appr./ Mvt Floes No. Lane Flom Rate Left Right Movement Volume PHF Rate Lanes Group RTOR In Lane Grp Turns Turns Eastbound Left 396 0.83 477 2 L 477 Thru 277 0.80 346 2 TR 346 Right 203 0.64 0 Westbound Left 399 0.90 443 1 L 443 Thru 0 0.90 'Right 643 0.94 0 1 RTR 0 Submitted into the public record in connection With Northbound item c on Left 0 Thru 1739 0.93 1870 2 T 1870 Waiter Foeman Right 260 0.84 1 R City -Clerk Southbound Left 234 0.86 330 2 L 330 Thru 1263 0.88 1435 3 T 1435 Right 0 * Value entered by user. SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTKW WORKSHEET Appr/ Ideal Adj Lane Sat f f f f f f £ f f Sat Group Flow. W HV G P BB A LU RT LT Flow Eastbound Sec LT Adj/LT Sat: L 1900 1.000 0.980 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.90 0.97 ---- 0.950 3090 TR 1900 1.000 0.980 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.90 0.95 1.000 Westbound Sec IT Adj/LT Sat: . L 1900 1.000 0.980 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.90 1.00 ---- 0.950 1593 LTR 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.90 1.00 1.000 R 1900 1.000 0.930 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.90 1.00 ---- Northbound Sec IT Adj/LT Sat: T 1900 1.000 0.980 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.90" 0.95 1.000 R 1900 1.000 0.980 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.90 1.00 ---- Southbound Sec IT Adj/LT Sat: L 1900 1.000 0.980 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.90 0.97 ---- 0.950 3090 T 1900 1.000 0.980 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.90 0.91 1.000 1.000 4577 CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Adj Adj Sat Flow Green --Lane Group-- Appr/ Lane Flow Rate Flow Rate Ratio Ratio Capacity v/c Mvmt Group (v) (s) (v/s) (g/C) (c) Ratio Eastbound Pri.. Sec. Left L 477 3090 0.15 0.209 645 0.74 Thru TR 346 0.209 EMSTING.doc 10 U0-�.036 Right Westbound Pri. Sec. Left L 443 1593 0.28 0.087 139 3.19 Thru LTR 0 0.087 Right R 0.087 Northbound Pri. Sec. Left Thru T 1870 0.478 Right R 0.478 Southbound Pri. Sec. Left L 330 3090 0.11 0.070 215 1.53 Thru T 1435 4577 0.31 0.574 2627 0.55 Right Sum (v/s) critical = 0.00 Lost Time/Cycle, L - 0.00 sec Critical v/c(X) = 0.00 LEVEL OF SERVICE WORRSBEET Appr/ Ratios Unf Prog Lane Incremental Res Lane Group Approach Lane Del Adj Grp Factor Del Del Grp v/c g/C dl Fact Cap k d2 d3 Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 0.74 0.209 42.6 1.000 645 0.30 4.7 0.0 47.2 D TR 0.209 1.000 0.0 47.2 D Westbound _ L 3.19 0.087 52.5 1.000 139 0.50 0.0 LTR 0.087 1.000 0.0 R 0.087 1.000 0.0 Northbound T 0.478 1.000 0.50 0.0 R 0.478 1.000 0.50 0.0 Southbound L 1.53 0.070 53.5 1.000 215 O.SO 986.2 0.0 T 0.5S 0.574 15.2 1.000 2627 0.15 0.2 0.0 15.4 B 15.4 B Intersection Delay 23.4 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS C HCS: Signals Release 3.1 Submitted into the Public Jackson M. Ahlstedt recO In connection With Jackson M. Ahlstedt, P.E. Jackson M. Ahlstedt, P.E. Item � On 46 N.W. s4th Street Walter Foeman Miami Shores, Florida 33150 Phone: (305) 754-8695 Fax: (305) 754-6695 city CIO*, E-Mail: OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Intersection: SE BTH ST/MIAMI AVE City/State: MIAMI/FLORIDA Analyst: J. AHLSTEDT UGSTING.doc 11 QU`-1036 • 0 Project No: BRICKELL GRAND Time Period Analyzed: EXIST PM PEAR HOUR Date: 7/29/99 East/West Street Name: SE TIH STREET North/South Street Name: MIAMI AVENUE VOLUME DATA ( Eastbound ( Westbound ( Northbound I Southbound I L T R 1 L T R ( L T R J L T R I Volume 1198 621 I I I I I I 597 41 1 PHF 10.90 0.67 1 ( 0.72 0.83 1 1 PK 15 Vol 155 175 1 ( 207 12 1 Hi Ln Vol I I I I I Grade 1 0 I I 0 I I Ideal Sat 1 1900 1 ( 1900 J ParkExist IX X I IX X I I NumPark 120 20 1 120 20 1 I % Heavy VehJ5 2 1 1 0 0 1 No. Lanes I. 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 1 LGConfig I LT I I TR ( J Lane Width 1 12.0 ( { 12.0 I I RTOR Vol I Adj Flow 1 934 1 i 829 I %InSharedLnl I { Prop Turns 10.24 1 I NumPeds I 1 0 1 0 1 I NumBUS I 0. { 1 0 1 ! • Duration 1.00 Area Type: CBD or Similar OPERATING PARAMETERS i Eastbound I Westbound ( Northbound I Southbound I I L T R ( L T R ( L T R J L T R Init Unmet j 0.0 0.0 j Arriv. Type l 3 I I 3 1 I Unit Est. I 3.0 I I 3.0 I 1 I Factor 1 1.000 ( 1 1.000 ( 1 Lost Time I 2.0 I 1 2.0 I I Ext of g I 2.0 I ( 2.0 ( J Ped Min g 1 0.0 ( ( 0.0 PHASE DATAr Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6_ 7 8 EB Left P 1 NB Left Thru P I Thru P Right ( Right P Peds ( Pad WB Left ( SB Left Submitted into the public Thru I Thru recor in connection with Right Peds I ( Right Pad lten1 Walter Foeman NB Right ( EB Right I . City Clerk SE Right ( WB ( Right Green 28.0 44.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 All Red 0.0 0.0 Cycle Length: 80.0 secs EMSTING.doc 12 0 VOLUME ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET Adjusted Prop. Prop. Appr./ Mvt Flow No. Lane Flow Rate Left Right Movement Volume PHF Rate Lanes Group RTOR In Lane Grp Turns Turns Eastbound Left 198 0.90 220 0 Thru 621 0.87 714 3 LT 934 0.24 Right 0 Westbound Left 0 Thru 0 Right 0 Northbound Left 0 Thru 597 0.72 829 3 TR 829 Right 41 0.83 0 Southbound Left 0 Thru 0 Right 0 + Value entered by user. SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET Appr/ Ideal Adj Lane Sat f f f f £ f f f f Sat Group Flow W HV G P BB A LU RT IT Flow Eastbound Sec LT Adj/LT Sat: LT 1900 1.000 0.980 1.000 0.900 .1.000 0.90. 0.91 1.000 0_988 4071 Westbound Sec IT Adj/LT Sat: Northbound Sec LT Adj/LT Sat: TR 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.900 1.000 0.90 0.91 1.000 Southbound Sec LT Adj/LT Sat: CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Adj Adj Sat Flow Green --Lane Group-- Appr/ Lane Flow Rate Flow Rate Ratio Ratio Capacity V/c Mvmt Group (V) (s) (V/s) (g/C) (c) Ratio Eastbound Pri. Sec.. Left Thru LT Right ® Westbound Pri. Sec. EMSTING.doc 934 4071 0.23 Submitted into the public rec Kin connection with ite L on Walter Foeman City Clerk 0.350 1425 0.66 00W1036 13 Left Thru Right Submitted Into Northbound the record 1nPublic Connection Pri . item J � with Sec. on Left Walter Foeman Thru TR 829 Right 0.550 City Clerk Southbound Pri. Sec. Left Thru Right Sum (v/s) critical = 0.00 Lost Time/Cycle, L = 0.00 sec Critical v/c(X) - 0.00 LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEET Appr/ Ratios Unf Prog Lane Incremental Res Lane Group Approach Lane Del Adj Grp Factor Del Del Grp v/c g/C dl Fact Cap k d2 d3 Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound LT 0.66 0.350 21.9 1.000 1425 0.50 2.4 0.0 24.3 C 24.3 C Westbound Northbound TR 0.550 Southbound 1.000 0.50 0.0 Intersection Delay - 24.3 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C HCS: Signals Release 3.1 Jackson M. Ahlstedt Jackson M. Ahlstedt, P.E. Jackson M. Ahlstedt, P.E. 46 N.W. 94th Street Miami Shores, Florida 33150 Phone: (305) 754-8695 Fax: (305) 754-8695 E-Mail: OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Intersection: SE 13TH ST\BRICKELL AVE City/State: MIAMI/FLORIDA Analyst: J. AHLSTEDT Project No: BRICKELL GRAND Time Period Analyzed: PM PK HR - EXISTING Date: 12/2/99 East. -,West Street Name: 5E 13TH STREET Borth/South Street Name: BRICKELL AVENUE EMSTING.doc 14 00!-100036 VOLUME DAT I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I ® I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I Volume 1306 69 91 1120 301 88 1159 1286 31 167 1426 528 1 PHF 10.80 0.76 0.92 10.76 0.75 0.70 10.91 0.88 0.60 10.74 0.94 0.88 1 PK 15 Vol 196 23 25 139 100 31 144 365 13 123 379 150 1 Hi Ln Vol I I I I I % Grade 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 i Ideal Sat 11900 1900 1900 11900 1900 1900 11900 1900 11900 1900 1900 1 ParkExist I I I I I %Heavy Vehj0 0 0 10 fl 0 10 0 fl 10 0 9 I No. Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 1 LGCoafig I L LT R I L T R I L TR I L T R 1 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 1 RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 Adj Flow 1382 91 99 1158 401 126 1175 1513 191 1517 600 1 %1nSharedLnJ0 I I Prop Turns 10.00 1 p,p3 NumPeds 1 0 1 p 1 0 1 p 1 NumBus 10 0 0 10 0 0 10 0 10 0 0 j Duration 1.00 Area Type: All other areas OPERATING PARAMETERS I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I Init Unmet 10.0 0.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 1 Arriv. Type13 3. 3 13 3 3 13 3 13 3 3 1 Unit Ext. 13.0 3.0 3.0 13.0 3.0 3.0 13.0 3.0 13.0 3.0 3.0 1 I Factor 1 1.000 1 1.000 1 1.000 1 1.000 1 Lost Time 12.0 2.0 2.0 .12.0 2.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 2.0 j Est of g 12.0 2.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 2.0 I Ped Min g 1 0.0 j 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 PHASE DATA Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A I NB Left P Thru A I Thru P Right A I Right P Pods I Ped WB Left A I SB Left P Thru A I Thru P Submitted Right A I Right P Ped into re COr the �'t?lic In Peds I COnneetio jtem NB Right I EB Right on WE Right,��'.a� Walter Foeman SB Right 1 ( City Cleric Green 15.0 16.0 69.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 4.0 All Red 1.0 1.0 1.0 Cycle Length: 115.0 secs VOLUME ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET Adjusted Prop. Prop. Appr./ Mvt Flow No. Lane Flow Rate Left Right Movement Volume PHF Rate Lanes Group RTOR In Lane Grp Turns Turns DGSTING.doc 15 00`lu36 • • • Eastbound Left 306 0.80 382 1 L 382 Thru 69 0.76 91 1 LT 91 0.00 Right 91 0.92 99 1 R 0 99 Westbound Submitted into the public Left 120 0.76 158 1 L 158 recor in connection vvith Thru Right 301 88 0.75 0.70 401 126 1 T 1 R 0 401 126 item �_PLJ on L = 4�0 Walter Foeman Northbound Left 159 0.91 175 1 L 175 =. City Cleft( Thru 1286 0.68 1461 2 TR 1513 0.03 Right 31 0.60 52 0 0 Southbound Left 67 0.74 91 1 L 91 Thru 1426 0.94 1517 2 T 1517 Right 528 0.88 600 1 R 0 600 + Value entered by user. SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET Appr/ Ideal Adj Lane Sat f f f f f f f f f Sat Group Flow W RV G P BB A LU RT LT Flow Eastbound Sec LT Adj/LT Sat: L 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 1.00 ---- 0.950 1805 IT 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.000 1.000 1900 R 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 1.00 0.850 ---- 1615 Westbound Sec LT Adj/LT Sat: L 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 1.00 ---- 0.950 1805 .T 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.000 1.000 1900 R 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 .1.000 1.00 1.00 9.850 ---- 1615 Northbound Sec LT Adj/LT Sat: L 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 1.00 ---- 0.090 170 TR 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 0.95 0.995 1.000 3591 Southbound Sec LT Adj/LT Sat: L 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 1.00 ---- 0.091 172 T 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 0.95 1.000 1.000 3610 R 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 1.00 0.850 ---- 1615 CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Adj Adj Sat Flow Green --Lane Group-- Appr/ Lane Flow Rate Flow Rate Ratio Ratio Capacity vic Mvmt Group (v) (s) (v/s) (g/C) (c) Ratio Eastbound Pri. Sec. Left L Thru LT Right R Westbound Pri. Sec. Left L Thru T Right R Northbound EN ISTING.doc 382 1805 # 0.21 0.130 235 1.63 91 1900 0.05 0.130 248 0.37 99 1615 0.06 0.130 211 0.47 158 1805 0.09 0.139 251 0.63 401 1900 # D.21 0.139 264 1.52 126 1615 0.08 0.139 225 0.56 16 G0--10�6 ! ! Pri. Submitted into the public Left L 175 170 # 1.03 0.600 if1e'gC2 rl iq.92nnec/_ti'on with Thru TR 1513 3591 0.42 0.600 2' 70on I-LL( Is Right Walter Foeman Southbound City Clerk Pri. Sec. Left Thru Right L T R 91 1517 600 172 3610 1615 .0.53 0.42 0.37 0.600 0.600 0.600 103 2166 969 0.88 0.70 0.62 Sum (v/s) critical = 1.45 Lost Time/Cycle. L = 12.09 sec Critical v/c(X) = 1.62 LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEET Appr/ Ratios Unf Prog Lane Incremental Res Lane Group Approach Lane Del Adj Grp Factor Del Del Grp v/c g/C dl Fact Cap k d2 d3 Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 1.63. 0.130 50.0 1.000 235 0.50 0.0 LT 0.37 0.130 45.7 1.000 248 0.11 0.,9 0.0 46.6 D 46.6 D R 0.47 0.130 46.3 1.000 211 0.11 1.7 0.0 48.0 D Westbound L 0.63 0.139 46.7 1.000 251 0.21 5.1 0.0 51.8 D T 1.52 0.139 49.5 1.000 264 0.50 953.6 0.0 51.8 D R 0.56 0.139 46.2 1.000 225 0.16 3.2 0.0 49.4 D Northbound L 1.72 0.600 23.0 1.000 102 0.50 0.0 TR 0.70 0.600 15.9 1.000 2155 0.50 2.0 0.0 17.9 B 17.9 B Southbound L 0.88 0.600 19.6 1.000 103 0.50 92.1 0.0 111.7 F T 0.70 0.600 15.9 1.000 2166 0.50 1.9 0.0 17.6 B 23.1 C R 0.52 0.600 14.6 1.000 969 0.50 3.0 0.0 17.6 B Intersection Delay = 24.4 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS C SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED IT WORKSHEET for exclusive lefts APPROACH EB WB NB SB Cycle Length, C 115.0 sec Actual Green Time for Lane Group, G 69.0 69.0 Effective Green Time for Lane Group, g 69.00 69.00 Opposing Effective Green Time, go 69.0 69.0 Number of Lanes in Lane Group, N 1 1 Number of Opposing Lanes, No 2 2 Adjusted Left -Turn Flow Rate, Vlt 175 91 Proportion of Left Turns in Opposing Flow, Plto 0.00 0.00 Adjusted Opposing Flow Rate, Vo 1517 1513 Lost Time for Lane Group, tl 4.00 4.00 Left Turns per Cycle: LTC=V1tC/3600 5.59 2.91 Opposing Flow per Lane, Per Cycle: Vole-VoC/3600fluo 25.51 25.44 Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo (Table 9-2 or Eqn 9-7) 1.00 1.00 gf=[Gexp(- a * (LTC ** b))J-tl, gf<=g 0.0 0.0 Opposing Queue Ratio: qro=1-Rpo(go/C) 0.40 0.40 gq-(4.943Volc**0.762)[(gro**1.06.1)-tl], gq<=g 32.67 32.50 . gu =g-gq if gq>=gf, =g-gf if gq<gf 36.33 36.50 n=(gq-gf)/2, n>=O 16.33 1.00 16.25 1.00 Ptho=l-Plto P1*=Plt[1+{(N-1)g/(gf+gu/E11+4.24))) 1.00 1.00 MSTING.doc 17 • Ell (Figure 9-7) 5.67 5.84 E12=(1-Ptho**n)/Plto, E12>-1.0 1.00 1.00 fmin-2(1+Plt)/g or fmin=2(1+P1)/g 0.06 0.06 gdiff=max(gq-gf,0) 0.00 0.00 fm=[gf/g]+[gu/9][1/{1+P1(Ell-1)]], (min-fmin;max=1.00) 0.09 0.09 flt-fm-[gf/g]+gdiff(l/fl+Plt(E12-1)}] +[gu/g][1/(1+Plt(Ell-1)],(min=fmin;maxal.0) or flt=[fm+0.91(N-1)]/N** fit 0.090 0.091 For special case of single -lane approach opposed by multilane approach, see text. *'If P1>=1 for shared left -turn lanes with N>l, then assume de -facto left -turn lane and redo calculations. ** For permitted left -turns with multiple exclusive left -turn lanes, flt=fm. For special case of multilane approach opposed by single -lane approach or when gf>gq, see test. SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED LT WORKSHEET for shared lefts APPROACH Cycle Length, C 115.0 sec Actual Green Time for Lane Group, G Effective Green Time for Lane Group, g Opposing Effective Green Time, go Number of Lanes in Lane Group, N Number of opposing Lanes, No Adjusted Left -Turn Flow Rate, Vlt Proportion of Left Turns in Lane Group, Pit. Proportion of Left Turns in Opposing Flow, Plto Adjusted Opposing Flow Rate, Vo Lost Time for Lane Group, tl Left Turns per Cycle: LTC=V1tC/3600 Opposing Flow per Lane, Per Cycle: Vole=VoC/3600fluo Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo (Table 9-2 or Eqn 9-7) gf-[Gexp(- a * (LTC ** b))]-tl, gf<=g Opposing Queue Ratio: qro-l-Rpo(go/C) gq-(4.943Volc**0.762)[(gro**1.061)-tl], gq<=g gu =g-gq if gq>=gf, =g-gf if gq<gf n-(gq-gf)/2, n>=0 Ptho-l-Plto P1*-Plt[l+{(N-1)9/(gf+gu/Ell+4.24))) Ell (Figure 9-7) E12-(1-Ptho**n)/Plto, E12>=1.0 fmin=2(1+Plt)/g or fmin=2(1+P1)/g gdiff=max(gq`gf,0) fm=[gf/g]+[gu/g][1/{l+P1(Ell-1)}], (minafmin;max-1.00) flt=fm-[gf/g]+gdiff[l/{1+Plt(E12-1)]] EB WB NB SB Submitted into the record in cone Public itemconnection with on .//( .� Walter Foeman City Clerk +[gu/g][1/(1+Plt(Ell-1)],(min-fmin;max-1.0) fit Primary For special case of single -lane approach opposed by multilane approach, see text. * If Pl>=1 for shared left -turn lanes with N>l, then assume de -facto left -turn lane and redo calculations. ** For permitted left -turns with multiple exclusive left -turn lanes, flt-fm. For special case of multilane approach opposed by single -lane approach or when gf>gq, see text. SUPPLEMENTAL UNIFORM DELAY WORKSHEET EBLT WBLT NBLT SBLT Adj. IT Vol from Vol Adjustment Worksheet, v v/c ratio from Capacity Worksheet, X Primary phase effective green, g Secondary phase effective green, gq (From Supplemental Permitted LT Worksheet), gu Cycle length, C 115.0 Red=(C-g-gq-gu), r EXISTING.doc 18 00 1UJ Arrivals: v/(3600(max(X,1.0))), qa Primary ph. departures: s/3600, sp Secondary ph. departures: s(gq+gu)/(gu*3600), ss XPerm XProt XCase Queue at begining of green arrow, Qa Queue at beginning of unsaturated green, Qu Residual queue, Qr Uniform Delay, dl DELAY/LOS WORKSHEET WITH INITIAL QUEUE Initial Dur. . Uniform Delay Initial Final Initial Lane Appr/ Unmet Unmet Queue Unmet Queue Group Lane Demand Demand Unadj. Adj. Param. Demand Delay Delay Group Q veh t hrs. ds dl sec u Q veh d3 sec d sec Eastbound Westbound Submitted into the public record in connection with Northbound stem -) on L_/_-� d Walter Foeman City Clerk Southbound Intersection Delay 24.4 sec/veh Intersection LOS C HCS: Signals Release 3.1 Jackson M. Ahlstedt Jackson M. Ahlstedt, P.E. Jackson M. Ahlstedt, P.E. 46 N.W. 94th Street Miami Shores, Florida 33150 Phone: (305) 754-8695 Fax: (305) 754-6695 E-Mail: Intersection: City/State: Analyst: Project No: Time Period Analyzed: Date: East/West Street Name: North/South Street Name: { Eastbound L T R EM71i%TG.doc OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS 13TH ST\S MIAMI AVE MIAMI/FLORIDA J. AHLSTEDT BRICKELL GRAND PM PK HR - EXISTING 12/2i99 SW 13TH STREET SOUTH MIAMI AVID7JE VOLUME DATA_ I Westbound I L T R I ( Northbound ( Southbound I L T R { L T R I I I I 19 06^1Ve 6 Volume 1109 373 38 131 934 105 186 189 59 116 142 234 1 PHF 10.74 0.90 0.59 10.65 0.91 0.78 10.81 0.81 0.54 10.67 0.78 0.81 1 PK 15 Vol .137 104 16 112 257 34 127 58 27 16 46 72 1 Hi Ln Vol Grade O ( 0 ( 0 1 0 � Ideal Sat i 900 1 1900 1 1900 1 1900 ParkExist I I I I I NumPark Heavy Veh10 0 0 10 0 0 10 0 0 10 0 0 1 No. Lanes 1 0 2 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 2 0 1 LGConfig 1 LTR I LTR I LTR I LTR i Lane Width 1 12.0 1 12.0 1 12.0 1 12.0 1 P.TOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 Adj Flow 1 625 1 1209 1 448 1 495 1 %InSharedLnl I I I I Prop Turns 10.24 0.10 10.04 0.11 10.24 0.24 10.05 0.58 1 NumPeds 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 NumBus 0 0 0 0 1 • Duration d 1.00 Area Type: All other areas OPERATING PARAMETERS ( Eastbound 1 Westbound ( Northbound { Southbound I L T R ( L T R I L T R i L T R I Init Unmet ( 0.0 i J 0.0 1 I 0.0 I 0.0 I Arriv. Type{ 3 { 3 ( 3 { 3 Unit Ext. 1 3.0 1 3.0 1 3.0 1 3.0 1 I Factor {- 1.000 { 1.000 { 1.000 { 1.000 1 Lost Time ( 2.0 1 2.0 { 2.0 I 2.0 Ext of g ( 2.0. ( 2.0 1 2.0 { 2.0 Pad Min g 1 0.0 { 0.0 ( 0.0 1 0.0 PHASE DATA Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6' 7 B EB Left P 1 NB Left A Thru P 1 Thru A Right P 1 Right A Pods { Ped WB Left P i SB Left A Thru P 1 Thru A Right P 1 Right A Peds 1 Ped NB Right i EB Right SB Right 1 WB Right Submit# I e Into the Public 4.0 4.0 17. 0 recor in connection with Yellow Green I itelYi /� L' on % ld Al l Red 1.0 1.0 Walter Foeman Cycle Length: 60.0 secs CitY Clerk Appr.i Mvt Movement Volume PHF Eastbound ® Left Thru 109 373 0.74 0.9090 Right 38 0.59 EXISTING. doc VOLUME ADRMHE.NT WORKSHEET Adjusted Prop. Prop. Flow No. Lane Flow Rate Left Right Rate Lanes Group RTOR In Lane Grp Turns. Turns 147 0 414 2 LTR 625 0.24 0.10 64 0 G 20 00-1036 Westbound Left 31 0.65 48 0 Thru 934 0.91 1026 2 LTR 1209 0.04 0.11 Right 105 0.78 135 0 0 Northbound Left 86 0.81 106 0 Thru 189 0.81 233 2 LTR 448 0.24 0.24 Right 59 0.54 109 0 0 Southbound Left 16 0.67 24 0 Thru 142 0.78 182 2 LTR 495 0.05 0.58 Right 234 0.81 289 0 0 * Value entered by user. SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORRSHEET Appr/ Ideal Adj Lane Sat f f f f f f f f f Sat Group Flow W HV G P BB A LU RT IT Flow Eastbound Sec LT Adj/LT Sat: LTR 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 0.95 0.985 0.561 1994 • • Westbound Sec LT Adj/LT Sat: LTR 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 0.95 0.983 0.910 3231 Northbound Sec IT Adj/LT Sat: LTR 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 0.95 0.964 0.691 2402 Southbound Sec LT Adj/LT Sat: - LTR 1900 1.000 1.000 1..000 1.000 1.000 1.00 0.95 0.912 0.921 3035 CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORRSHEET Adj Adj Sat Flow Green --Lane Group-- Appr/ Lane Flow Rate Flow Rate Ratio Ratio Capacity v/c Mvmt Group (v) (s) (v/s) (g/C) (c) Ratio Eastbound Pri. Sec. Left Thru LTR Right Westbound Pri. Sec. Left Thru LTR Right Northbound Pri. Sec. Left Thru LTR Right EMSTII\TG.doc 625 1209 448 1994 0.31 0.550 1097 3231 # 0.37 0.550 1777 0.57 Submitted into the public recor in connection with item on 0.68 Walter Foeman City Clerk 2402 # 0.19 0.283 681 0.66 21 • Southbound Pri. Sec. Left Thru LTR 495 3035 0.16 0.283 860 0.58 Right Sum (v/s) critical = 0.56 Lost Time/Cycle, L = 8.00 sec Critical v/c(X) - 0.64 LEVEL OF SERVICE WORRSHEET Appr/ Ratios Unf Prog Lane Incremental Res Lane Group Approach Lane Del Adj Grp Factor Del Del Grp v/c SIC dl Fact Cap k d2 d3 Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound LTR 0.57 0.550 8.8 1.000 1097 0.50 2.2 0.0 11.0 B 11.0 B Westbound LTR 0.68 0.550 9.7 1.000 1777 0.50 2.1 0.0 11.9 B 11.9 B Northbound LTR 0.66 0.283 18.9 1.000 681 0.23 2.4 0.0 21.3 C 21.3 C Southbound 'LTR 0.58 0.283 18.4 1.000 860 0.17 1.0 0.0 19.4 B 19.4 B Intersection Delay - 14.5 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED LT WORRSHEET for exclusive lefts APPROACH Cycle Length, C 60.0 sec Actual Green Time for Lane Group, G Effective Green Time for Lane Group, g Opposing Effective Green Time, go Number of Lanes in Lane Group, N Number of Opposing Lanes, No Adjusted Left -Turn Flow Rate, Vlt Proportion of Left Turns in Opposing Flow, Plto Adjusted Opposing Flow Rate, Vo Lost Time for Lane Group, tl Left Turns per Cycle: LTC-V1tC/3600 Opposing Flow per Lane, Per Cycle: Volc=VoC/3600fluo Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo (Table 9-2 or Eqn 9-7) gf=[Gexp(- a * (LTC ** b))]-tl, gf<=g Opposing Queue Ratio: qro=l-Rpo(go/C) gq=(4.943Volc**0.762)[(gro**1.061)-tl], gq<-g gu =g-gq if gq>=gf, =g-gf if gq<gf n-(gq-gf)/2, n>=0 Ptho-l-Plto P1*-Plt[l+{(N-1)g/(gf+gu/Ell+4.24))) Ell (Figure 9-7) E12-(1-Ptho**n)/Plto, E12>=1.0 � fmin=2(1+Plt)/g or fmin=2(1+P1)/g gdiff=max(gq-gf,0) fm=[gf/g]+[gu/g][l/{l+Pl(Ell-1)}], (min=fmin:max=1.00J flt-fm=[gf/g]+gdiff[l/{l+Plt(E12-1)1) EXISTING. doc EB WB NB SB Submitted into the public record in connection with on Walter Foeman City Clerk 22 0 0 - 1 " 36 • • E +[gu/g][l/(1+Plt(Ell-1)],(min=fmin;max-1.0) or fit-[fm+0.91(N-1)]/N** fit For special case of single -lane approach opposed by multilane approach, see text. * If P1>=1 for shared left -turn lanes with N>1, then assume de -facto left -turn lane and redo calculations. +� For permitted left -turns with multiple exclusive left -turn lanes, flt=fm. For special case of multilane approach opposed by single -lane approach or when gf>gq, see text. SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED LT WORKSHEET for shared lefts APPROACH Cycle Length, C 60.0 sec Actual Green Time for Lane Group, G Effective Green Time for Lane Group, g Opposing Effective Green Time, go Number of Lanes in Lane Group, N Number of Opposing Lanes, No Adjusted Left -Turn Flow Rate, Vlt Proportion of Left Turns in Lane Group, Pit Proportion of Left Turns in Opposing Flow, Plto Adjusted Opposing Flow Rate, Vo Lost Time for Lane Group, tl Left Turns per Cycle: LTC=V1tC/3600 Opposing Flow per Lane, Per Cycle: Volc-VoC/3600fluo Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo (Table 9-2 or Eqn 9-7) gf-[Gexp(- a * (LTC ** b))]-tl, gf<-g Opposing Queue Ratio: qro-l-Rpo(go/C) gq=(4.943Volc**0.762)[(gro**1.061)-tl], gq<-g gu =g-gq if gq>=gf, =g-gf if gq<gf n-(gq-gf)/2, n>=0 Ptho=1-Plto P1*=Plt[l+{(N-1)9/(gf+gu/Ell+4.24))) Ell (Figure 9-7) E12=(1-Ptho**n)/Plto, E12>-1.0 fmin=2(1+Plt)/g or fmin=2(1+P1)/g gdiff=max(gq-gf,0) (min-fmi11;max=1.00) flt=fm-[gf/g]+gdiff[l/{l+Plt(E12-1)}] EB WB NB SB 33.0 33.0 17.0 17.0 33.00 33.00 17.00 17.00 33.0 33.0 17.0 17.0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 147 48 106 24 0.24 0.04 0.24 0.05 0.04 0.24 0.05 0.24 1209 625 495 446 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 2.45 0.80 1.77 0.40 10.61 5.48 4.34 3.93 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.2 11.6 0.5 6.8 0.45 0.45 0.72 0.72 10.76 2.04 3.28 2.48 22.24 21.44 13.72 10.24 4.30 0.00 1.38 0.00 0.96 0.76 0.95 0.76 0.94 0.09 9.62 0.10 4.83 2.68 2.35 2.24 4.02 1.00 1.37 1.00 0.12 0.07 0.19 0.13 6.59 0.00 2.76 0.00 0.21 0.91 0.47 0.93 +[gu/g][1/(1+Plt(Ell-1)],(min-fmin;max-1.0) or flt=[fm+0.91(N-1)]/N** fit Primary 0.561 0.910 0.691 0.921 For special case of single -lane approach opposed by multilane approach, see text. * If Pl>=1 for shared left -turn lanes with N>1, then assume de -facto left -turn lane and redo calculations. ** For permitted left -turns with multiple exclusive left -turn lanes, flt=fm. For special case of multilane approach opposed by single -lane approach or when gf>gq, see text. SUPPLEMENTAL UNIFORM DELAY WORKSHEET Adj. LT Vol from Vol Adjustment Worksheet, v v/c ratio from Capacity Worksheet, X Primary phase effective green, g Secondary phase effective green, gq (From Supplemental Permitted LT Worksheet), gu Cycle length, C 60.9 Red=(C-g-gq-gu), r Arrivals: v/(3600(max(X,1.0))), qa Primary ph. departures: s/3600, sp Secondary ph. departures: s(gq+gu)/(gu*3600), XPerm XProt XCase EXISTiNG.doc EBLT WBLT NBLT SBLT Submitted into the public record in connection vdith Item on J_L-_1L_a,_g ss Walter Foeman City Clerk 23 00-1"36 9 • Queue at begining of green arrow, Qa Queue at beginning of unsaturated green, Qu Residual queue, Qr Uniform Delay, dl DELAY/LOS WORKSHEET WITH INITIAL QUEUE Initial Dur. Uniform Delay Initial Final Initial Lane Appr/ Unmet Unmet Queue Unmet Queue Group Lane Demand Demand Unadj. Adj. Param. Demand Delay Delay Group Q veh t hrs. ds dl sec u Q veh d3 sec d sec Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Intersection Delay 14.5 sec/veh Intersection LOS B Jackson M. Ahlstedt Jackson M. Ahlstedt, P.E. Jackson M. Ahlstedt, P.E. 46 N.W. 94th Street Miami Shores, Florida 33150 Phone: (305) 754-8695 E-Mail: HCS: Signals Release 3.1 Fax: (305) 754-9695 OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Intersection: SW 13M ST\SW 1ST AVE City/State: MIAMI/FLORIDA Analyst: J. AHLSTEDT p Submitted In$O the Ubi1C Project No: BRICKELL GRAND record in connection with Time Period Analyzed: PM PK HR - EXISTING item {JG On .�i6�G Date: 12/1/99 East/West Street Name: SW 13TH STREET Walter Foenlan North/South Street Name: SW 1ST AVENUE City Clerk VOLUME DATA ( Eastbound ( Westbound I Northbound Southbound I ( L T R ( L T R I L T R I L T R I f I i i I Volume PHF i PK 15 Vol Hi La Vol i X Grade I Ideal Sat i EXISTING. doc 510 44 0.89 0.69 143 16 0 1900 30 1282 0.75 0.85 10 377 0 1900 62 0 23 0.58 0.90 0.72 27 8 0 1900 52 135 290 0.74 0.68 0.89 18 50 61 0 1900 1900 1900 24 0o-1036 ParkExist I I I I I NumPark Heavy Veh( 0 0 l0 0 10 0 0 10 0 0 1 No. Lanes 1 0 2 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 • LGConfig I TR I IT I LTR I L T R I Lane Width 1 12.0 1 12.0 1 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 Vol 0 0 AdjRFlow 1 637 1 1548 1 139 170 199 326 1 %InSharedLul I I I I Prop Turns 1 0.10 10.03 10.77 00.23 1 NumPeds 1 0 1 1 0 NumBus 1 0 1 0 1 0 10 0 0 1 Duration 1.00 Area Type: All other areas OPERATING PARAMETERS 1 Eastbound ) Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I L T R l L T R I L T R 1 L T R I I Init Unmet I 0.0 I I 0.0 i 1 0.0 l 10.0 0.0 I 0.0 1 Arriv. Typel 3 1 3 1 3 13 3 3 1 Unit Ext. 1 3.0 1 3.0 1 3.0 13.0 3.0 3.0 1 I Factor 1 1.000 1 1.000 1 1.000 1 1.000 1 Lost Time 1 2.0 1 2.0 1 2.0 12.0 2.0 2.0 1 Ext of g 1 2.0 l 2.0 1 2.0 12.0 2.0 2.0 1 Pod Min g l 0.0 I 0.0 I 0.0 1 0.0 1 PHASE DATA_ Phase Combination 1 2_ 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left 1 NB Left A Thru P 1 Thru A Right P 1 Right A Peds 1 Pod WB Left P I SB Left A Thru P 1 Thru A Right ( Right A Peds I Ped NB Right 1 EB Right SB Right I 1 WB Right Green 33.0 Yellow 4.0 All Red 0.0 Cycle Length: 60.0 Appr.i Mvt Movement Volume PHF i Submitted into the I public 19. o recorrL in connection with 4.0 item 0.0 on //(r Walter Foeman secs City Clerk VOLUME ADJUSTMENT WORRSHEET Adjusted Prop. Prop. Flow No. Lane Flow Rate Left Right Rate Lanes Group RTOR In Lane Grp Turns Turns Eastbound Left 0 Thru 510 0.89 573 2 TR Right 44 0.69 64 0 Westbound Left 30 0.75 40 0 Thru 1282 0.65 1500 2 IT Right 0 Northbound EMSTING.doc 637 0.10 0 1548 0.03 25 0r��� Left 62 0.58 107 0 Thru 0 0.90 0 1 LTR 139 0.77 0.23 Right 23 0.72 32 0 0 Southbound Left 52 0.74 70 1 L 70 Thru 135 0.68 199 1 T 199 Right 290 0.89 326 1 R 0 326 + Value entered by user. SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET Appr/ Ideal Adj Lane Sat f f f f f f f f f Sat Group Flow W HV G P BB A LU RT IT Flow Eastbound Sec LT Adj/LT Sat: TR 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 0.95 0.985 1.000 3556 Westbound Sec LT Adj/LT Sat: LT 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 0.95 1.000 0.927 3345 .Northbound Sec LT Adj/LT Sat: LTR 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 1.00 0.869 0.559 .922 Southbound Sec IT Adj/LT Sat: L 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 1.00 ---- 0.589 1119 T 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.000 1.000 1900 R 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 1.00 0.850 ---- 1615 CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORRSHEET Adj Adj Sat Flow Green --Lane Group-- Appr/ Lane Flow Rate Flow Rate Ratio Ratio Capacity v/c Mvmt Group (v) (s) (v/s) (g/C) (c) Ratio Eastbound Pri . Sec. Left Thru TR 637 3556 0.18 0.550 1956 0.33 Right Westbound Fri. Sec. Left Thru LT 1548 3345 # 0.46 0.550 1840 0.84 Right SUbMi ted into the pliblic Northbound 'COP In connection WithSec. ' Pri - Item on Left Walter Foernan Thru LTR 139 922 0.15 0.317 292 0.48 Right CitY Clerk Southbound Pri. Sec. Left L 70 1119 0.06 0.317 354 0.20 Thru T 199 1900 0.10 0.317 602 0.33 Right R 326 1615 # 0.20 0.317 511 0.64 EMSTING. doc 26 00-036 0 • Sum (v/s) critical = 0.66 Lost Time/Cycle,.L - 8.00 sec Critical v/c(X) - 0.77 LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEET Appr/ Ratios Unf Prog Lane Incremental Res Lane Group Approach Lane Del Adj Grp Factor Del Del Grp v/c g/C dl Fact Cap k d2 d3 Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound TR 0.33 0.550 7.4 1.000 1956 0.50 0.4 0.0 7.8 A 7.8 A Westbound IT 0.84 0.550 11.3 1.000 1840 0.50 5.1 0.0 16.4 B 16.4 B Northbound LTR 0.48 0.317 16.5 1.900 292 0.11 1.2 0.0 17.7 B 17.7 B Southbound L 0.20 0.317 14.9 1.000 354 0.11 0.3 0.0 15.2 B T 0.33 0.317 15.6 1.000 602 0.11 0.3 0.0 16.0 B 15.8 B R 0.64 0.317 17.6 1.000 511 0.22 2.7 0.0 20.2 C Intersection Delay = 14.3 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS B SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED LT WORRSHEET for exclusive lefts APPROACH EB WB NB SB Cycle Length, C 60.0 sec Actual Green Time for Lane Group, G 19.0 Effective Green Time for Lane Group, g 19.00 Opposing Effective Green Time, go 19.0 Number of Lanes in Lane Group, N 1 Number of Opposing Lanes, No 1 Adjusted Left -Turn Flow Rate, Vlt 70 Proportion of Left Turns in Opposing Flow, Plto 0.77 Adjusted Opposing Flow Rate, Vo 139 U_ co Lost Time for Lane Group, tl 4.00 E U Left Turns per Cycle: LTC=V1tC/3600 1.17 Q W Opposing Flow per Lane, Per Cycle: Volc-VoC/3600fluo 2.32 Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo (Table 9-2 or Eqn 9-7) 1.00 C)0 W U gf-[Gexp(- a * (LTC ** b))]-tl, gf<-g 0.0 U N Opposing Queue Ratio: qro-l-Rpo(go/C) 0.68 p C O � gq-(4.943Volc**0.762)[(gro**1.061)-tl], gq<=g 2.26 c o gu -g-gq if gq>-gf, =g-gf if gq<gf 16.74 -- v n=(gq-gf)/2, n>=O 1.13 -p Ptho=l-Plto 0.23 �- P1*=Plt[l+{(N-1)g/(gf+gu/Ell+4.24))) 1.00 Ell (Figure 9-7 ) 1.50 E ® E12-(1-Ptho**n)/Plto, E12>=1.0 1.05 0 fmin=2(1+Plt)/g or fmin=2(1+P1)/g 0.21 07 = gdiff=max(gq-gf,0) 2.26 fm=[gf/g]+[gu/g][1/{1+P1(Ell-1)}], (min-fmin;max=1.00) 0.59 flt-fm-[gf/g]+gdiff[1/{1+Plt(E12-1)}] +[gu/g][l/(l+Plt(Ell-1)],(min-fmin;max-l.0) or flt=[fm+0.91(N-1)]/N** fit 0.589 For special case of single -lane by approach opposed multilane approach, see text. EMSTTNG.doc 27 ®`i00 • • * If P1>-1 for shared left -turn lanes with N>1, then assume de -facto left -turn lane and redo calculations. ** For permitted left -turns with multiple exclusive left -turn lanes, flt=fm. For special case of multilane approach opposed by single -lane approach or when gf>gq, see text. SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED LT WORKSHEET for shared lefts APPROACH EB WE NB SB Cycle Length, C 60.0 sec Actual.Green Time for Lane Group, G 33.0 19.0 Effective Green Time for Lane Group, g 33.00 19.00 Opposing Effective Green Time, go 33.0 19.0 Number of Lanes in Lane Group, N 2 1 Number of Opposing Lanes, No 2 1 Adjusted Left -Turn Flow Rate, Vlt 40- 107 Proportion of Left Turns in Lane Group, Plt 0.03 0.77 Proportion of Left Turns in Opposing Flow, Plto 0.00 0.00 Adjusted Opposing Flow Rate, Vo 637 199 Lost Time for Lane Group, tl 4.00 4.00 Left Turns per Cycle: LTC=V1tC/3600 0.67. 1.78 Opposing Flow per Lane, Per Cycle: Volc-VoC/3600fluo 5.59 3.32 Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo (Table 9-2 or Eqn 9-7) 1.00 1.00 gf=[Gexp(- a * (LTC ** b))]-tl, gf<=g 13.1 1.0 Opposing Queue Ratio: qro=l-Rpo(go/C) 0.45 0.68 gq-(4.943Volc**0.762)[(gro**1.061)-tl], gq<-g 2.18 4.23 gu -g-gq if gq>=gf, =S-gf if gq<gf 19.94 14.77 n-(gq-gf)/2, n>=0 0.00 1.62 Ptho=l-Plto 1.00 1.00 Pl*-Pltjl+{(N-1)9/(gf+gu/Eli+4.24))) 0.06 0.77 Ell (Figure 9-7) .2.72 1.70 E12-(1-Ptho**n)/Plto, E12>=1.0 1.00 1.00 fmin-2(1+Plt)/g or fmin-2(1+P1)/g 0.06 0.19 gdiff-max(gq-gf,0) 0.06 0.00 fm=[gf/g]+[gu/g][1/{1+P1(Ell-1)11, (min-fmin;max-1.00) 0.94 0.56 flt-fm-[gf/g]+gdiff[l/fl+Plt(E12-1)1] +[gu/g][l/(1+Plt(Ell-1)],(min-fmin;max-1.0) or fit=jfm+0.91(N-1}]/N** flt Primary 0.927 0.559 • For special case of single -lane approach opposed by multilane approach, see text. * If P1>=1 for shared left -turn lanes with N>l, then assume de -facto left -turn lane and redo calculations. ** For permitted left -turns with multiple exclusive left -turn lanes, flt-fm. For special case of multilane approach opposed by single -lane approach or when gf>gq, see text. SUPPLEMENTAL UNIFORM DELAY WORKSHEET Adj. IT Vol from Vol Adjustment Worksheet, v We ratio from Capacity Worksheet, X Primary phase effective green, g Secondary phase effective green, gq (From Supplemental Permitted LT Worksheet), gu Cycle length, C 60.0 Red-(C-g-gq-gu), r Arrivals: v/(3600(max(X,1.0))), qa Primary ph. departures: s/3600, sp Secondary ph. departures: s(gq+9u)/(gu*3600), XPerm XProt Xcase Queue at begining of green arrow, Qa Queue at beginning of unsaturated green, Qu Residual queue, Qr Uniform Delay, dl EBLT •WBLT NBLT SBLT ss Submitted into the public record ir, connectionG�'e' item -'►h on aL�L Walter Foeman City Clerk DELAY/LOS WORKSHEET WITH INITIAL QUEUE EMSTING.doc 28 0 0 - U16f Initial Dur. Uniform Delay Initial Final Initial Lane Appr/ Unmet Unmet Queue Unmet Queue Group Lane Demand Demand Unadj. Adj. Param. Demand Delay Delay Group Q veh t hrs. ds dl sec u Q veh d3 sec d sec Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Intersection Delay 14,3 sec/veh Intersection LOS B HCS: Signals Release 3.1 Jackson M. Ahlstedt Jackson M. Ahlstedt. P.E. Jackson M. Ahlstedt, P.E. • 46 N.W. 94th Street Miami Shores, Florida 33150 Phone: (305) 754-6695 Fax: (305) 754-6695 E-Mail: OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Intersection: SE 15TH RD AND BRICKELL City/State: MIAMI/FLA Analyst: No: J. AHLSTEDT PARK Submitted into the public Project PLACE Time Period Analyzed: EXIST PM PEAK recor in connection with Date: 4/8/00 item L on East/West Street lams: SE 5TH ROAD North/South Street Name: BRICKELL AVENUE Walter Foeman City Clerk VOLUME DATA I Eastbound I Westbound ( Northbound I Southbound I I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I Volume 131 56 115 1131 67 27 158 585 59 133 1543 51 1 PHF 10.78 0.75 0.85 10.83 0.68 0.48 10.87 0.92 0.71 10.75 0.96 0.66 1 PK 15 Vol 110 19 34 139 25 14 117 159 21 Ill 402 19 1 Hi Ln Vol I I I I Grade 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 Ideal Sat 1 1900 1 1900 11900 1900 11900 1900 1 ParkExist l NumPark I Heavy Veh{0 0 0 10 0 0 10 .0 0 10 0 0 1 No. Lanes 1 0 2 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 LGConfig I LTR I TR I L TR I L TR I Lane Width 1 12.0 1 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 1 DUSTING.doc 29 0-10 • U • • RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 Adj Flow 1 250 1 155 167 719 144 1682 1 %InSharedLnl I I i I Prop Turns 10.16 0.54 10.00 0.36 1 0.12 1 0.04 i NumPeds 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 I NumBus 1 0 1 0 10 0 10 0 1 Duration 1.00 Area Type: All other areas OPERATING PARAMETERS I Eastbound J Westbound I Northbound I Southbound i i L T R 1 L T R I L T R I L T R Init Unmet f 0.0 y 0.0 10.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 I Arriv. Type l 3 1 3 (3 3 13 3 I Unit Est. 1 3.0 1 3.0 13.0 3.0 13.0 3.0 1 I Factor I 1.000 I 1.000 1 1.000 1 1.000 1 Lost Time ( 2.0 ( 2.0 12.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 i Ext of g 1 2.0 ( 2.0 12.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 1 Ped Ming I 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 PHASE DATA Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A i NB Left A Thru A I Thru A Right A I Right A Peds 1 Pod WB Left A y SB Left A Thru A 1 Thru A Right A 1 Right A Peds j Pod NB Right ( EB Right SB Right ( WB Right Submitted into the public I 1 record in connection with Green 23.0 Yellow 4.0 All Red 1.0 82.0 item 1 on I-�-� y 4.0 Walter Foeman 1.0 City Clerk Cycle Length: 115.0 secs VOLUME ADJUSTMENT WORRSHEEr Adjusted Prop. Prop. Appr.i Mvt Flaw No. Lane Flow Rate Left Right Movement Volume PHF Rate Lanes Group RTOR In Lane Grp Turns Turns Eastbound Left 31 0.78 40 0 Thru 56 0.75 75 2 LTR 250 0.16 0.54 Right 115 0.85 135 0 0 Westbound Left 131 0.83 158 0 Thru 67 0.68 99 2 TR 155 0.00 0.36 Right 27 0.48 56 0 0 Northbound Left 58 0.67 67 1 L 67 Thru 585 0.92 636 2 TR 719 0.12 Right 59 0.71 83 0 0 Southbound Left 33 0.75 44 1 L 44 EMSTING.doc 34 0 0 " i 0-1-6 i • Thru 1543 0.96 1607 2 TR 1682 0.04 Right 51 0.68 75 0 0 # Value entered by user. SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET Appr/ Ideal Adj Lane Sat f f f f f f f f f Sat Group Flow W HV G P BB A LU RT LT Flow Eastbound Sec LT Adj/LT Sat: LTR 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 0.95 0.919 0.882 2926 Westbound Sec LT Adj/LT Sat: TR 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 1.00 0.946 1.000 1797 Northbound Sec LT Adj/LT Sat: L 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 1.00 ---- 0.095 180 TR 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 0.95 0.983 1.000 3547 Southbound Sec LT Adj/LT Sat: L 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 1.00 ---- 0.356 677 TR 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 0.95 0.993 1.000 3586 CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Adj Adj Sat Flow Green --Lane Group-- . Appr/ Lane Flow Rate Mvmt Group (v) Flow Rate Ratio (s) (v/s) Ratio Capacity v/c (g/C) (c) Ratio Eastbound Pri. Sec. Left Thru LTR 250 2928 0.09 0.200 586 0.43 Right Westbound Pri. Sec. Left Thru TR 155 1797 # 0.09 0.200 359 0.43 Right Northbound Submitted into the public Pri • in connection with Left L 67 180 0.37 ��r��eppcord 0.713 128 m?5 On Thru TR 719 3547 0.20 0.713 2529 0.28 Walter Foeman Right City Clerk Southbound Pri. Sec. Left L 44 677 0.06 0.713 483 0.09 Thru TR 1682 3586 # 0.47 0.713 2557 0.66 Right Sum (v/s) critical - 0.56 • Lost Time/Cycle, L = 0.00 sec Critical v/c(X) = 0.60 LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEET EXISTING. doc 31 00-100u Appr/ Ratios Unf Prog Lane Incremental Res Lane Group Approach Lane Del Adj Grp Factor Del Del Grp v/c SIC dl Fact Cap k d2 d3 Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound LTR 0.43 0.200 40.2 1.000 586 0.11 0.5 0.0 40.7 D 40.7 D Westbound TR 0.43 0.200 40.3 1.000 359 0.11 0.6 0.0 41.1 D 41.1 D Northbound L 0.52 0.713 7.6 1.000 128 0.13 3.9 0.0 11.5 B TR 0.28 0.713 5.9 1.000 2529 0.11 0.1 0.0 6.0 A 6.5 A Southbound L 0.09 0.713 5.1 1.000 483 0.11 0.1 0.0 5.1 A TR 0.66 0.713 8.9 1.000 2557 0.23 0.6 0.0 9.5 A 9.4 A Intersection Delay = 13.0 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS B SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED LT WORKSHEET for exclusive lefts APPROACH EB WB NB SB Cycle Length, C 115.0 sec Actual Green Time for Lane Group, G 82.0 82.0 Effective Green Time for Lane Group, g 82.00 82.00 Opposing Effective Green Time, go 82.0 82.0 Number of Lanes in Lane Group, N 1 1 Number of Opposing Lanes, No 2 2 Adjusted Left -Turn Flow Rate, Vlt 67 44 Proportion of Left Turns in Opposing Flow, Plto 0.00 0.00 Adjusted Opposing Flow Rate, Vo 1682 719 Lost Time for Lane Group, tl 4.00 4.00 Left Turns per Cycle: LTC-V1tC/3600 2.14 1.41 Opposing Flow per Lane, Per Cycle: Volc-VoC/3600£luo 28.28 12.09 Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo (Table 9-2 or Equ 9-7) 1.00 1.00 U COgf -[Gexp(- a * (LTC ** b))]-tl, gf<=g 0.0 0.29 0.0 0.29 N U Opposing Queue Ratio: qro-l-Rpo(go/C) ® gq=(4.943Volc*-0.762)[(gro**1.061)-tl], gq<=g 27.94 4.78 O LL ._ gu =g-gq if gq>=gf, =g-gf if gq<gf 54.06 77.22 (D n=(gq-gf)/2, n>=0 13.97 2.39 Ptho-1-Plto 1.00 1.00 O C Pl*=Plt[l+((N-1)g/(gf+gu/E11+4.24))) 1.00 1.00 C O Ell (Figure 9-7) 6.94 2.64 v E12-(1-P.tho**n)/Plto, E12>-1.0 1.00 1.00 fmin=2(1+Plt)/g or fmin-2(1+P1)/g 0.05 0.05 gdiff=max(gq-gf,0) 0.00 0.00 fm=[gf/g]+[gu/g][1/{1+P1(El l-1)}], (min=fmin;max=1.00) 0.09 0.36 U E flt-fm=[gf/g]+gdiff[1/{1+Plt(E12-1))] O O O +[gu/g][1/(1+Plt(Ell-1)],(min-fmin;max-1.0) or flt-[fm+0.91(N-1)]/N** *- "= flt 0.095 0.356 For special case of single -lane approach opposed by multilane approach, see text. * If P1>-1 for shared left -turn lanes with N>1, then assume de -facto. left -turn lane and redo calculations. ** For permitted left -turns with multiple exclusive left -turn lanes, flt=fm. For special case of multilane approach opposed by single -lane approach or when gf>gq, see test. MSTING.doc 32 00-: 036 SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED LT WORKSHEET for shared lefts APPROACH EB Cycle Length, C 115.0 sec Actual Green Time for Lane Group, G 23.0 Effective Green Time for Lane Group, g 23.00 Opposing Effective Green Time, go' 23.0 Number of Lanes in Lane Group, N 2. Number of Opposing Lanes, No 2 Adjusted Left Turn Flow Rate, Vlt 40 Proportion of Left Turns in Lane Group, Plt 0.16 Proportion of Left Turns in Opposing Flow, Plto 0.00 Adjusted Opposing Flow Rate, Vo 155 Lost Time for Lane Group, tl 4.00 Left Turns per Cycle: LTC-V1tC/3600 1.28 Opposing Flow per Lane, Per Cycle: Volc-VoC/3600fluo 2.48 Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo (Table 9-2 or Eqn 9-7) 1.00 gf=[Gexp(- a * (LTC ** b))]-tl, gf<-g 4.0 Opposing Queue Ratio: qro=1-Rpo(go/C) 0.80 gq=(4.943Volc**0.762)[(gro**1.061)-tl], gq<=g 0.14 gu -g-gq if gq>=gf, =g-gf if gq<gf 18.96 n=(gq-gf)/2, n>=0 0.00 Ptho=l-Plto 1.00 Pl*=Plt[1+((N-1)g/(gf+gu/El1+4.24))) 0.34 Ell (Figure 9-7) 1.62 E12-(1-Ptho**n)/Plto, E12>-1.0 1.00 fmin=2(1+Plt)/g or fmin=2(1+P1)/g 0.12 gdiff=max(gq-5f,0) 0.00 fm=[gf/g]+[gu/g][1/(1+P1(Ell-1)}], (min=fmin;max=1.00) 0.85 flt=fm-[gf/g]+gdiff[l/(1+Plt(E12-1))] WB NB SB +(gu/g][l/(1+Plt(Ell-1)],(min-fmin;maxa1.0) or flt-[fm+0.91(N-1)]/N** flt Primary 0.882 For special case of single -lane approach opposed by multilane approach, see text. * If P1>-1 for shared left -turn lanes with N>1, then assume de -facto left -turn lane and redo calculations. * For permitted left -turns with multiple exclusive left -turn lanes, flt-fm. For special case of multilane approach opposed by single -lane approach or when gf>gq, see text. SUPPLEMENTAL UNIFORM DELAY WORKSHEET Adj. IT Vol from Vol Adjustment Worksheet, v v/c ratio from Capacity Worksheet, X Primary phase effective green, g Secondary phase effective green, gq (From Supplemental Permitted IT Worksheet), gu Cycle length, C 115.0 Red-(C-g-gq-gu), r Arrivals: v/(3600(max(X,1.0))), qa Primary ph. departures: s/3600, sp Secondary ph'. departures: s(gq+gu)/(gu*3600), XPerm XProt XCase Queue at begining of green arrow. Qa Queue at beginning of unsaturated green, Qu Residual queue, Qr Uniform Delay, dl EBLT WELT NBLT SBLT ss Submitted into the public reco in connection with Item � on =L-4 _v_d Walter Foeman City Clerk DELAY/LOS WORKSHEET WITH INITIAL QUEUE Initial Dur. Uniform Delay Initial Final Initial Lane Appr/ Unmet Unmet Queue Unmet Queue Group Lane Demand Demand Unadj. Adj. Param. Demand Delay Delay Group Q veh t hrs.. ds dl sec u Q veh d3 sec d ser- EXISTING.doc 33 00-10966 Eastbound 0 Westbound Northbound Southbound Intersection Delay 13.0 sec/veh Intersection LOS B Submitted into the public record in. connection with item ELL- on Walter F©eman City Clerk HCS: Signals Release 3.1 Jackson M. Ahlstedt Jackson M. Ahlstedt, P.E. Jackson M. Ahlstedt, P.E. 46 N.W. 94th Street Miami Shares, Florida 33150 Phone: (305) 754-8695 Fax: (305) 754-8695 E-Mail: OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Intersection: SE 15TH RD AND MIAMI AVE City/State: MIAMI/FLA Analyst: J. AHLSTEDT Project No: PARR PLACE Time Period Analyzed: EXIST PM PK HR Date: 4/8/00 East/West Street Name: SE 15TH ROAD North/South Street Name: S. MIAMI AVENUE VOLUME DATA EMSTING.doc 34 00-1036 I Eastbound ( Westbound I Northbound ( Southbound I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R 1 Volume 110 183 224 155 122 24 180 96 32 120 221 17 1 PHF 10.50 0.81 0.86 10.82 0.93 0.46 10.81 0.87 0.73 10.63 0.70 0.61 I PR 15 Vol 15 56 65 117 33 13 125 28 11. 16 79 7 1 Hi Ln Vol % Grade I 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 Ideal Sat 1 1900 1 1900 1 1900 1 1900 ParkExist I I I I I NumPark % Heavy Veh10 0 0 10 0 0 10 0 0 10 0 0 1 No. Lanes 1 0 2 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 2 0 1 LGConfig { LTR I LTR I LTR I LTR { Lane Width 1 12.0 1 12.0 1 12.0 1 12.0 I RTOR Vol 1 150 0 0 0 1 Adj Flow I 332 1 250 1 253 1 376 I .InSharedLnl I I I I Prop Turns 10.06 0.26 10.27 0.21 10.39 0.17 10.09 0.07 1 NumPeds 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 { NumBus 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 Duration 1.00 Area Type: All other areas OPERATING PARAMETERS I Eastbound ( Westbound ( Northbound I Southbound { I L T R 1 L T R 1 L T R I L T R I Init Unmet i 0.0 0.0 I 0.0 1 0.0 Arriv. Type 1 3 I 3 I 3 I 3 Unit Est. I 3.0 I 3.0 I 3.0 I 3.0 I I Factor I 1.000 j 1.000 I 1.000 I 1.000 I Lost Time I 2.0 1 2.0 I 2.0 I 2.0 Ext of g I 2.0 I 2.0 I 2.0 1 2.0 I Ped Min g i 0.0 I 0.0 { 0.0 I 0.0 I PHASE DATA Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 6 EB Left A I NB Left A Thru A I Thru A Right A I Right A Pods I Ped WB Left A { SB Left A Thru A I Thru A Right A 1 Right A Peds { Ped NB Right { EB Right SB Right I i WB Right Submitted into the public I reco in connection with Green 9.0 41.0 item on f 1 - & -ct/ Yellow 4.0 4.0 Walter Foemart All Red 1.0 1.0 City Cleric Cycle Length: 60.0 secs VOLUME ADJUSTMENT WORRSHEET Adjusted Prop. Prop. Appr.i Mvt Flow No. Lane Flow Rate Left Right Movement Volume Eastbound PHF Rate Lanes Group RTOR In Lane Grp Turns Turns Left 10 0.50 20 0 MSTING.doc 35 6 • .7 • • • Thru 183 0.81 226 Z LTR 332 0.06 0.26 Right 224 0.86 86 0 150 Westbound Left 55 0.82 67 0 Thru 122 0.93 131 2 LTR 250 0.27 0.21 Right 24 0.46 52 0 0 Northbound Left 80 0.81 99 0 Thru 96 0.87 110 2 LTR 253 0.39 0.17 Right 32 0.73 44 0 0 Southbound Left 20 0.63 32 0 Thru 221 0.70 316 2 LTR 376 0.09 0.07 Right 17 0.61 28 0 0 • Value entered by user. SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT KRKSHEET Appr/ Ideal Adj Lane Sat f f f f f f f f f Sat Group Flow w HV G P BB A LU RT IT Flow Eastbound Sec IT Adj/LT Sat: LTR 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 0.95 0.961 0.922 3200 Westbound Sec LT Adj/LT Sat: LTR 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 0.95 0.969 0.723 2530 Northbound Sec LT Adj/LT Sat: LTR 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 0.95 0.974 0.748 2629 Southbound Sec IT Adj/LT Sat: LTR 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 0.95 0.969 0.921 3286 CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Adj Adj Sat Flow Green --Lane Group-- Appr/ Lane Flow Rate Flow Rate Ratio Ratio Capacity We Mvmt Group (v) (s) (v/s) (g/C) (c) Ratio Eastbound Pri. Sec. Left Thru LTR Right Westbound Pri. Sec. Left Thru LTR Right Northbound Pri. Sec. Left EMSTING.doc 332 250 3200 # 0.10 0.150 480 0.69 2530 0.10 0.150 380 0.66 Submitted into the reCo12-L'C"Onnection Public item �nri on /`/h Walter FOeman 36 City Cleric 0®-10 Thru LTR 253 2629 0.10 0.683 1796 0.14 Right Southbound Pri. Sec. Left Thru LTR 376 3266 # 0.11 0.693 2245 0.17 Right 0 • Sum (v/s) critical = 0.22 Lost Time/Cycle, L = 8.00 sec Critical v/c(X) - 0.26 LEVEL OF SERVICE WORI{SHEET Appr/ Ratios Unf Prog Lane Incremental Res Lane Group Approach Lane Del Adj Grp Factor Del Del Grp v/c g/C dl Fact Cap k d2 d3 Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound LTR 0,69 0.150 24.2 1.000 460 0.26 4.3 0.0 28.5 C 26.5 C Westbound LTR 0.66 0.150 24.0 1.000 380 0.23 4.2 0.0 28.3 C 28.3 C Northbound LTR 0.14 0.683 3.3 1.000 1796 0.11 0.0 0.0 3.4 Southbound LTR 0.17 0.683 3.4 1.000 2245 0.11 0.0 0.0 3.4 A 3.4 A A 3.4 A Intersection Delay = 15.4 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS - B SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED IT WORKSHEET for exclusive lefts APPROACH Cycle Length, C 60.0 sec Actual Green Time for Lane Group, G Effective Green Time for Lane Group, g Opposing Effective Green Time, go Number of Lanes in Lane Group, N Number of Opposing Lanes, No Adjusted Left -Turn Flow Rate, Vlt Proportion of Left Turns in Opposing Flow, Plto Adjusted Opposing Flow Rate, Va Lost Time for Lane Group, tl Left Turns per Cycle: LTC-V1tC/3600 Opposing Flow per Lane, Per Cycle: Volc-VoC/3600fluo Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo (Table 9-2 or Equ 9-7) gf-[Gexp(- a * (LTC ** b))]-tl, gf<-g Opposing Queue Ratio: qro=1-Rpo(go/C) gq=(4.943Volc**0.762)[(gro**1.061)-tl], gq<=g gu =g-gq if gq>=gf,=g-gf*if gq<gf n-(Sq-gf)/2, 0=0 Ptho-l-Plto P1*-Plt[1+{(N-1)g/(gf+gu/E11+4.24))) Ell (Figure 9-7) E12=(1-Ptho**n)/Plto, E12>=1.0 fmin=2(1+Plt)/g or fmin=2(1+P1)/g EMSTING.doc EB WB NB SB Submitted into the public reco in connection with item L on LL =c& Walter Foeman City Cl""L' 0- 0 0 • • gdiff=max(gq-gf,fl) fm=[gf/gj+[gu/gj[1/{l+Pl(E11-1)}j. (min-fmin;max-1.00) flt-fm-[gf/g]+gdiff[l/{1+Plt(E12-1)}] +[gu/g]jl/(1+Plt(Ell-1)),(min=fmin;max-1.0) or flt-[fm+0.91(N-1)]/N** flt For special case of single -lane approach opposed by multilane approach, see text. * If P1>=1 for shared left -turn lanes with N>1, then assume de -facto left -turn lane and redo calculations. For permitted left -turns with multiple exclusive left -turn lanes, flt=fm. For special case of multilane approach opposed by single -lane approach or when gf>gq, see text. SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED LT WORKSHEET for shared lefts APPROACH Cycle Length, C 60.0 sec Actual Green Time for Lane Group. G Effective Green Time for Lane Group, g Opposing Effective Green Time, go Number of Lanes in Lane Group, N Number of Opposing Lanes, No Adjusted Left -Turn Flow Rate, Vlt Proportion of Left Turns in Lane Group, Plt Proportion of Left Turns in Opposing Flow, Plto Adjusted Opposing Flow Rate, Vo Lost Time for Lane Group, tl Left Turns per Cycle: LTC=V1tC/3600 Opposing Flow per Lane, Per Cycle: Volc-VoC/3600fluo Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo (Table 9-2 or Eqn 9-7) gf-[Gexp(- a * (LTC ** b))]-ti, gf<=g Opposing Queue Ratio: qro=l-Rpo(go/C) gq=(4.943Volc**0.762)[(gro**1.061)-tl], gq<=g Su -g-gq if gq>=gf, =g-gf if gq<gf a-(gq-gf)/2, n>=0 Ptho=l-Plto P1*=Plt[1+{(N-1)g/.(gf+gu/Ell+4.24))) Ell (Figure 9-7) E12=(1-Ptho**n)/Plto, E12>-1.0 fmin=2(1+Plt)/g or fmin=2(1+P1)/g gdiff=max(gq-gf,0) fm=[gf/g]+[gu/g][1/{1+P1(Ell-1)}], (min-fmin;max=1.00) flt-fm=[gf/g]+gdiff[1/{1+Plt(E12-1)}] EB WB NB SB 9.0 9.0 41.0 41.0 9.00 9.00 41.00 41.00 9.0 9.0 41.0 41.0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 20 67 99 32 0.06 0.27 0.39 0.09 0.27 0.06 0.09 0.39 250 332 376 253 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 0.33 1.12 1.65 0.53 2.19 2.91 3.30 2.22 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.0 0.0 7.6 19.4 0.85 0.85 0.32 0.32 0.02 1.48 0.0.0 0.00 6.97 7.52 33.41 21.63 0.00 0.74 0.00 0.00 0.73 0.94 0.91 0.61 0.11 0.57 0.97 0.18 1.81 1.98 2.07 1.82 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.25 0.35 0.10 0.06 0.00 1.48 0.00 0.00 0.93 0.54 0.59 0.93 +[gu/g]I1/(l+Plt(Ell-1)],(min=fmin;max-1.0) or flt=[fm+0.91(N-1)]/N** flt Primary 0.922 0.723 0.748 0.921 For special case of single -lane approach opposed by multilane approach, see text. * If P1>=1 for shared left -turn lanes with N>1, then assume de -facto left -turn lane and redo calculations. ** For permitted left -turns with multiple exclusive left -turn lanes, fit=fm. For special case of multilane approach opposed by single -lane approach or when gf>gq, see text. SUPPLEMENTAL UNIFORM DELAY WORKSHEET Adj. LT Vol from Vol Adjustment Worksheet, v v/c ratio from Capacity Worksheet, X Primary phase effective green, g Secondary phase effective green, gq (From Supplemental Permitted LT Worksheet), gu Cycle length, C 60.0 Red=(C-g-gq-gu), r Arrivals: v/(3600(max(X,1.0))), qa Primary ph. departures: 9/3600, sp Secondary ph. departures: s(gq+gu)/(gu*3600), se DaSTING.doc EBLT WBLT NBLT SBLT Submitted into the public recor in connection with Item 4LL on -/ Walter Foeman City Clerk 38 00-l0a0 XPerm XProt XCase Queue at begining of green arrow, Qa Queue at beginning of unsaturated green, Qu Residual queue, Qr Uniform Delay, dl DELAY/LOS WORMEET WITH INITIAL QUEUE Initial Dur. Uniform Delay Initial Final Initial Lane Appr/ Unmet Unmet Queue Unmet Queue Group Lane Demand Demand Unadj. Adj. Param. Demand Delay Delay Group Q veh t hrs. ds dl sec u Q veh d3 sec d sec Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Intersection Delay 15.4 sec/veh Intersection LOS B Jackson M. Ahlstedt Jackson M. Ahlstedt, P.E. Jackson M. Ahlstedt, P.E. ® 46 N.W. 94th Street. Miami Shores, Florida 33150 Phone: (305) 754-8695 EXISTING. doc Submitted into the public record in connection with ite�R on V �' Walter Foeman (.ity Clerk HCS: Signals Release 3.1 Fax: (305) 754-8695 CM 0-10'D6" E-Mail: • Is Intersection: City/State: Analyst: Project No: Time Period Analyzed: Date: East/West Street Name: North/South Street Name: OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS 15TH RD AND SW 1ST AVE MIAMI/FLA J. AHLSTEDT PARK PLACE EXIST PM PK HR 4/8/00 15TH ROAD SW 1ST AVENUE VOLUME DAT. ( Eastbound { Westbound ( Northbound { Southbound { I L T R I L T R i L T R I L T R { Volume 16 282 200 11 j 1125 49 PHF 10.30 0.90 { 0.80 0.69 { 0582 I PK 15 Vol 15 78 1 62 4 { 13395 Hi Ln Vol { ( I I 1 % Grade J 0 j 0 { 1 0 1 Ideal Sat 1 1900 { 1900 1 1 1900 { ParkExist { I { I I NumPark Heavy VehJ0 0 0 0 { 10 0 No. Lanes { 0 2 0 { 0 2 0 I 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 { LGConfig i LT I TR I I LR j Lane Width ( 12.0 ( 12.0 { ( 12.0 RTOR Vol { { 0 ( I 0 I Adj Flow 1 333 ( 266 I { 192 i ilnSharedLnI ( I J I Prop Turns 10.06 { 0.06 1 10.69 0.31 { NumPeds 1 { 0 { 0 { 0 NumBus 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 { Duration 1.00 Area Type: All other areas OPERATING PARAMETERS I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound { Southbound I L T R I L T R I L T R J L T R J Init Unmet 1 0.0 I 1 0.0 I ( i { 0.0 1 Arriv..Typej 3 ( 3 { 1 3 l Unit Ext. 1 3.0 ( 3.0 { I 3.0 { I Factor ( 1.000 ( 1.000 I J 1.000 I Lost Time 1 2.0 ( 2.0 I 1 2.0 I Est of g 1 2.0 ( 2.0 1 1 2.0 i Pad Ming { 0.0 { 0.0 1 { 0.0 PHASE DATA Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A ( N8 Left Thru A { Thru Right I Right Peds ( Pad WB Left 1 SH Left A Submitted into the public Thru A ( Thru Pec r in connection with Right Peds A Right A Pad item on Walter FOeman NB Right j EB Right I Clay Clerk SB Right I WB Right E)GSTING.doc I . 40 0.r qJ J I Green 42.9 8.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 All Red 1.0 1.0 Cycle Length: 60.0 secs VOLUME ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET Adjusted Prop. Prop. Appr./ Mvt Flow No. Lane Flow Rate Left Right Movement Volume PHF Rate Lanes Group RTOR In Lane Grp Turns Turns Eastbound Left 6 0.30 20 0 Thru 282 0.90 313 2 LT 333 0.06 Right 0 Westbound Left 0 Thru 200 0.80 250 2 TR 266 0.06 Right 11 0.69 16 0 0 Northbound Left 0 Thru 0 Right 0 Southbound Left 125 0.95 132 0 Thru 0 LR 192 0.69 0.31 Right 49 0.82 60 0 0 * Value entered by user. SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET Appr/ Ideal Adj Lane Sat f f f f f f f f f Sat Group Flow W HV G P BB A LU RT LT Flow Eastbound Sec IT Adj/LT Sat: LT 1900. 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 0.95 1.000 0.934 3374 Westbound Sec IT Adj/LT Sat: TR 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 0.95 0.991 1.000 3577 Northbound Sec LT Adj/LT Sat: Southbound Sec LT Adj/LT Sat: LR 1900 1:000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 1.00 0.858 0.967 1576 CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Adj Adj Sat Flow Green --Lane Group-- Appr/ Lane Flow Rate Flow Rate Ratio Ratio Capacity v/c Mvmt Group (v) (s) (v/s) (g/C) (c) Ratio Eastbound Pri . Submitted into the public Sec. record in connection with MUSTING.doc item 41 .—_l on ./ �r�v . Walter Foemari City Clerk 0 U _ 0., • • Left Thru LT 333 3374 Right Westbound Pri. Sec. Left Thru TR 266 3577 Right Northbound Pri. Sec. Left Thru Right Southbound Pri. Sec. Left Thru LR 192 1576 Right is 0.10 0.700 2362 0.14 0.07 0.700 2504 0.11 0.12 0.000 0 0.00 Sum (vis) critical = 0.00 Lost Time/Cycle, L - 0.00' sec Critical vic(X) = 0.00 LEVEL OF SERVICE WORRSHEET Appri Ratios Unf Prog Lane Incremental Res Lane Group Approach Lane Del Adj Grp Factor Del Del Grp vic g/C dl Fact Cap k d2 d3 Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound LT 0.14 0.700 3.0 1.000 2362. 0.11 0.0 0.0 3.0 A 3.0 A Westbound TR 0.11 0.700 2.9 1.000 2504 0.11 0.0 0.0 2.9 A 2.9 A Northbound Southbound LR 0.00 0.000 30.0 1.000 0 0.11 0.0 0.0 30.0 C 30.0 C Intersection Delay = 9.5 (seciveh) Intersection LOS.= A SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED LT WORRSHEET for exclusive lefts APPROACH EB WB NB SB Cycle Length, C 60.0 sec Actual Green Time for Lane Group, G Effective Green Time for Lane Group, g Submitted into Opposing Effective Green Time, go feC the public Number of Lanes in Lane Group, N ord in connection Number of Opposing Lanes, No item on with Left-Turn Flow Rate, Vlt v Proportion of Left Turns in Opposing Flow, Plto Walter F EXISTING.doc oeman 42 City Clerk Adjusted Opposing Flow Rate, Vo Lost Time for Lane Group, tl Left Turns per Cycle: LTC-V1tC/3600 Opposing Flow per Lane, Per Cycle: Volc-VoC/3600fluo Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo (Table 9-2 or Eqn 9-7) . gf=[Gexp(- a * (LTC ** b))]-tl, gf<=g Opposing Queue Ratio: qro=1-Rpo(go/C) gq=(4.943Volc**0.762)[(gro**1.061)-tl], gq<=g gu =g-gq if gq>=gf, =g-gf if gq<gf n=(gq-gf)/2, n>=0 Ptho-l-Plto - Pl*=Plt[l+((N-1)g/(gf+gu/Ell+4.24))) Ell (Figure 9-7) E12-(I-Ptho**n)/Plto, E12>-1.0 fmin=2(1+Plt)/g or fmin=2(1+P1)/g gdiff=max(gq-gf,0) fm=[gf/g]+[gu/g][1/{l+P1(Ell-1)}], (min-fmin;max-1.00) flt=fm-[gf/g]+gdiff[l/(1+Plt(E12-1)}] +[gu/g][l/(1+Plt(Ell-1)],(min=fmin;max-1.0) or flt-[fm+0.91(N-1)]/N** fit For special case of single -lane approach opposed by multilane approach, see text. * If P1>=1 for shared left -turn lanes with N>l, then assume de -facto left -turn lane and redo calculations. ** For permitted left -turns with multiple exclusive left -turn lanes, flt=fm. For special case of multilane approach opposed by single -lane approach or when gf>gq, see text. SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED LT WORKSHEET for shared lefts APPROACH EB WB NB SB Cycle Length, C 60.0 sec Actual Green Time for Lane Group, G 42.0 Effective Green Time for Lane Group, g • 42.00 Opposing Effective Green Time, go 42.0 Number of Lanes in Lane Group, N 2 Number of Opposing Lanes, No 2 Adjusted Left -Turn Flow Rate, Vlt 20 Proportion of Left Turns in Lane Group, Pit 0.06 Proportion of Left Turns in Opposing Flow, Plto 0.00 Adjusted Opposing Flow Rate, Vo 266 Lost Time for Lane Group, tl 4.00 Left Turns per Cycle: LTC=V1tC/3600 0.33 Opposing Flow per Lane, Per Cycle: Vole-VoC/3600fluo 2.33 Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo (Table 9-2 or Eqn 9-7) 1.00 gf-[Gexp(- a * (LTC ** b))]-tl, gf<=g 24.1 Opposing Queue Ratio: qro=l-Rpo(go/C) 0.30 gq-(4.943Volc**0.762)[(gro**1.061)-tl], gq<=g 0.00 gu =g-gq if gq>=gf, =g-gf if gq<gf 17.88 n-(gq-gf)/2, n>=o o.00 Submitted into the publiC Ptho-l-Plto 1.00 record in connection with Pl*-Plt[l+((N-1)g/(gf+gu/Ell+4.24))) Ell (Figure 9-7) 0.13 1.34 lte E12=(1-Ptho**n)/Plto, E12>-1.0 1.00 Walter Foeman fmin=2(1+Plt)/g or fmin-2(1+P1)/g 0.05 gdiff=max(gq-gf,0) 0.00 City Cleric fm=[gf/g]+[gu/g][1/(1+P1(Ell-1)}], (min-fmin;max-1.00) 0.96 flt=fm-[gf/g]+gdiff[1/(l+Plt(E12-1)}] +[gu/g][1/(1+Plt(Ell-1)],(min=fmin;max-1.0) or flt=[fm+0.91(N-1)]/N** fit Primary 0.934 For special case of single -lane approach opposed by multilane approach, see text. * If P1>=1 for shared left -turn lanes with N>l, then assume de -facto left -turn lane and redo calculations. ** For permitted left -turns with multiple exclusive left -turn lanes, flt=fm. EMSTING.doc 43 For special case of multilane approach opposed by single -lane approach or when gf>gq, see text. SUPPLEMENTAL LNIFORK DELAY WORKSHEET EBLT WBLT NBLT SBLT Adj. IT Vol from Vol Adjustment Worksheet, v v/c ratio from Capacity Worksheet, X Primary phase effective green, g Secondary phase effective green, gq (From Supplemental Permitted IT Worksheet), gu Cycle length, C 60.0 Red=(C-g-gq-gu), r Arrivals: v/(3600(max(X,1.0))), qa Primary ph. departures: s/3600, sp Secondary ph. departures: s(gq+gu)/(gu*3600), ss XPerm XProt XCase Queue at begining of green arrow, Qa Queue at beginning of unsaturated green, Qu Residual queue, Qr Uniform Delay, dl DELAY/LOS WORKSHEET WITH INITIAL QUEUE Initial Dur. Uniform Delay Initial Final Initial Lane Appr/ Unmet Unmet Queue Unmet Queue Group Lane Demand Demand Unadj. Adj. Param. Demand Delay Delay Group Q veh t hrs. ds dl sec u Q veh d3 sec d sec Eastbound 18 Westbound Northbound Southbound Intersection Delay 9.5 sec/veh Intersection LOS A Submitted Into the public record in connection With item on / -L4 Waiter Foeman EXIST1NG.doc City Clerk 44 00-1030 • • • • Submitted into the public recurO item. .inn connection with ® Walter Foeman City Clerk EXISTING.doc 45 00-0 6 HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 3.1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS is Analyst: J. AHLSTEDT Intersection: SW 4TH AVE AND 15TH RD Count Date: 2/17/00 Time Period: PM PK Intersection Orientation: East-West Major St. Vehicle Volume Data: Movements: 1 2 3 4 5 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Volume: 2 48 9 36 161 20 5 7 21 63 121 8 HFR: 4 76 12 64 173 32 12 12 30 83 139 16 PHF: 0.50 0.63 0.75 0.56 0.93 0.63 0.42 0.58 0.69 0.76 0.87 0.50 PHV: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Pedestrian Volume Data: Movements: Flow: Lane width: Walk speed: % Blockage: Median Type: Raised Curb 4 of vehicles: 0 Flared approach Movements: u of vehicles: Northbound 0 k of vehicles: Southbound 0 Lane usage for movements 1,2&3 approach: Lane.l Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R ------------ -------------------------------------------------------- Y Y N N Y Y N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 4,5&6 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R ----------------------------------------------------------- ---------- Y Y N N Y Y N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 7,8&9 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R --------------------------------------------------------------------- Y Y Y N N N N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 10,11&12 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Y Y Y N N N N N N Channelized: N Submitted into public Grade: 0.00 the recor in connection with item )a--L on Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles: l Water FOen11n 15R4AE.doc 1 City Clerk 6 00-1v • • Eastbound Shared In volume, major th vehicles: 24 Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: 0 Sat flow rate, major th Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: vehicles: 1700 1700 Number of major street through lanes: 2 Length of study period, hrs: . 1.00 -------------------------------------------------------- Worksheet 4 Critical Gap and Follow-up time calculation Critical Gap Calculations: Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 ------------------------------- t c,base 4.1 4.1 7.5 6.5 ------------- 6.9 7.5 t c,hv 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 P by 0.00 0.00 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 t c,g 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 G 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t 3,It 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 t c.T: 1 stage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t c 1 stage 4.1 4.1 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 Follow Up Time Calculations: Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 -------------------------------------------------------- t f,base 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 t f.Hv 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 P by 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t f 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 Worksheet 6 Impedance and capacity equations Step 1: RT from Minor St. 9 Conflicting Flows 44 ---------------------------------------------------- Potential Capacity 1023 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 Movement Capacity 1023 Probability of Queue free St. 0,97 ----------- ----------------------------------------- Step 2: IT from Major St. 4 Conflicting Flows 88 Potential Capacity 1520 Pedestrian impedance Factor 1.00 Movement Capacity 1520 Probability of Queue free St. 0.96 Maj. L Shared In. Prob. Queue Free St. 1.00 Westbound 80 0 0 1700 2 11 12 6.5 6.9 2.0 2.0 0.00 0.00 0.2 0.1 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 6.5 6.9 11 12 -------- -- 403 3 1.0 1.0 0.00 0.00 4.0 3.3 12 ------------------------------ 102 939 1,00 939 0.98 ------------------------------ 1 205 1379 1.00 1379 1.00 1. Oa Step 3: TH from Minor St. 6 11 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows 424 414 Potential Capacity 525 532 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 524 530 Probability of Queue free St. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0.98 0.74 Step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows 375 370 Potential Capacity 562 567 Pedestrian Impedance Factor Maj., L, Min T Impedance factor 1,00 0.74 1.00 0.9submitted into the public Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.80 0,78 0.98 6.96ecord in Connection with Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity -----------p----Y---------------------------------^----------------�m+ 440 53 ,9eiL n!11_-W' Walter Foeman Worksheet 8 Shared Lane Calculations City Cleric 15R4AE.doc 2 H ,60 0®- Shared Lane Calculations Movement ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 7 8 9 10 11 12 '---------=---------ii-------------------I ' II v(vph) 12 12 30 83 139 16 Movement Capacity 440 524 1023 539 530 939 .Shared Lane Capacity ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 681 550 Worksheet 10 delay,queue length, and LOS Movement 1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4 7 I-------------------II-------------------I 8 9 10 11 12 v(vph) 4 64 I I 54 II II 238 I I C m(vph) 1379 1520 681 550 v/c 0.00 0.04 0.08 0.43 95% queue length Control Delay 7.6 7.5 10.7 16.5 LOS A A B C Approach Delay 10.7 16.5 Approach LOS ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- B C Worksheet 11 Shared Major LT Impedance and Delay Rank 1 Delay Calculations Movement 2 5 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- P of 1.00 0.96 V it 24 80 V i2. 0 0 S it 1700 0 S i2 1700 1700 P* Oj 1.00 1.00 D maj left 7.6 7.5 N number major st lanes 2 2 Delay, rank 1 mvmts ------ ----- -------- ---------------------- 0_0- 0.0 -------------------------------------------- Submitted into the publld record in connection with item JP2-1 — on J_t - i(� =m !Walter Foeman City Cleric 15R4AE. doe 3 0 0 — io" eP 0 i APPENDIX B Existing Roadway Link Level of Service Submitted into the public record in connection with on IL- G— Walter Foeman 0Nhi Cleric 00-10�6 11 • J • • O UUoolowoloUU I O j olLc�c� I I � Z Z: I3Iw as' I I w � I ( I wi I w W,V) U)i 0O S 2 2 2 S Z 2 S ZI2 I I I I I I I nalala f- Ie e N N e e N N eIe N N ele N N. e e NIN I I F a W `L O 000000 O O O O a ON I W D i lco I OI 117 I°'�rNiNN`rinti�r� 1n�0 O O ����� R I I I ( I! J OI I I f7'O I C I > I >' I 0 0 0 0 0 0 NIN 0 0 CI I n r O10 O otocool10 o W O O tD U1i N1N �Ico c v co NNt�t+1C7� eke a c0 �N i I I p O O 101f')0000 rnrn�ntnlu�cor- O O O�O 0 0 NNOO 0 0 cornIoor�nJncoeelcom I I uN.i1N0000t0tol0O f�eet� tAO ��Me tO 06 I NNE Vim �n O O 0J00 O O V C CD O p I I I YN7 rn O_ O O O OI OIpIccn CD V to N N N�tD co P7 t!7 6 001� Ui ee NNNv ��- N CC)RO I m I m Q j I QI I I O co olo ��r O t0 o o .-I.- I I I I 0 o IN P1 �I.- j ^I W �O a a j t i�l� L- �' Izzw, 000Wo zzz,z i I gz� ol0,000W}o WW�W zzzzy} , I IZIgooww 3 0000�o 1 �0 0000i:❑ L � w l NIN elv eIN NIN N e I I I I wI �1 IN N e eIeIN NI.NIN e I I- I co Ii j rn N N N N1N Z== Z Z I I gI NNNNN Z== Z Z O 00 I U, 00 ID7 7 m m 3 m c 7 m c 7 y � I I I I I m 7 7 C c m N m I "m 7 m c b owe 7 m C 7 m c� m cap o m > >b > > mtnK QY E`r'YY iu) E�� EY Em�YYc2mmIwUJmm co (0 mmMcoco, C 7 V m m a m l4 7 ID m C 7 N W I ' j I 3 m C 7 .-. m m m a1 m t6 7 m C 7 m N N m c 080 O C m c> 0 0 a' r m C m b O C C >I 0 0 s Q b N co fr Q c� I Q> bltA mvia¢ } Qz atL� s W Y -z - E c" '"N I I i ma Et`�� E ENN .Mto LU °° 1033`3 I t°www M333 m�tnww��wmm I t tD!9cocnmMMco&00 II I I 1 i � 1 III a ai I I ZI a�a D m m m m 7 7I C C m 7 m c m C C cr m m 7 7 I I �► V i N y m 0) 7 7 C C m 7 m C m C O m m 7 7 Qa m>>> I b W) N I I w m m >>> b c C C9 z b �(j) to 1£O r m QQ C9a'I I Z o bb rnCO 1fi m m >> p -Z� i��33•-:- I I IrXI 9YY— mma) -- (Q X i� m W W' Y c E 21 I* Q Q LL J W E E A T I (i i Q¢I W t W W C o W (A fQ W W E E E T W cnmmmmU)wCOMM 1 1 I, al u)cAmmit`nfD0U)�� Submitted into the public recor in connection with Item F� on % r Walter Foeman City Cleric 0 0 0 Q u') 0 00-D36co • • APPENDIX C Intersection Level of Service for Future Traffic Volumes Without Project Submitted into the public record in connection with ® item -I,- on -f-i=%C,61 Walter Foeman City Clerk 0a--1036 0 • • Jackson M. Ahlstedt Jackson M. Ahlstedt, P.E. Jackson M. Ahlstedt, P.E. 46 N.W. 94th Street Miami Shores, Florida 33150 Phone: (305) 754-8695 E-Mail: • • Intersection: City/State: Analyst: Project No: Time Period Analyzed: Date: East/'West Street Name: North/South Street Name: 1 Eastbound L T R Volume 1 PHF 1 PK 15 Vol 1 Hi Ln Vol 1 % Grade 1 Ideal Sat 1 ParkExist { NumPark Heavy Vehl No. Lanes 1 0 0 0 LGConfig i Lane Width I RTOR Vol 1 Adj Flow I %InSharedLnl Prop Turns I NumPeds 1 0 NumBus 1 HCS: Signals Release 3.1 Fax OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS SE 77H ST/BRICKELL AVE MIAMI/FLORIDA J. AHLSTEDT PARK PLACE FUTURE W/O PROJECT PM PEAK 6/5/00 SE 7TH STREET BRICKELL AVENUE VOLUME DATA (305) 754-8695 { Westbound I Northbound ( Southbound I L T R I L T R I L T R I I I 1129 492 130 1508 2794 40 143 1780 504 10.60 0.82 0.76 10.87 0.97 0.88 10.71 0.98 0.90 154 150 43 1146 720 11 115 454 140 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 11900 1900 1900 11900 1900 11900 1900 1900 1 1 I I I 10 0 0 12 2 2 10 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 0 I 1 2 1 1 L LT R I L TR 1 L T R 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 1 1 1 1215 600 1584 2880 161 1816 10 1 1 10.00 1 1 1 50 1 50 1 50 10 0 0 10 0 10 0 0 Duration 1.00 Area Type: CBD or Similar Eastbound L T R Init Unmet I Arriv. Typal Unit Ext. l I Factor l Lost Time Eat of g 1 Ped Min g 1 OPERATING PARAMETERS Westbound { Northbound L T R I L T R I 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 3 3 3 13 3 3.0 3.0 3.0 13.0 3.0 1.000 1 1.000 2.0 2.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 0.0 1 0.0 Southbound L T R 0.0 0.0 0.0 3 3 3 3.0 3.0 3.0 1.000 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 PHASE DATA Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 i 5 6 7 8 SobMittedthe public fitted EB Left 1 NB Left A SUbm into in connectiOn, With Thru 1 Thru PtecOr . R� 1 On 1� 1 Right I Right tern Peds i Ped alter FoeMall FUTURE.doc CitytC1et WB Left A I SB Left A P Thru A I Thru P Right A I Right P Peds • I Ped NB Right I EB Right SB Right I I WB I Right Green 20.0 I 33.0 49.0 Yellow 4.0 3.0 4.0 All Red 1.0 0.0 1.0 Cycle Length: 115.0 secs VOLUME ADJUSTMENT WORRSHEET Adjusted Prop. Prop. Appr.i Mvt Flow No. Lane Floss Rate Left Right Movement Volume PHF Rate Lanes Group RTOR In Lane Grp Turns Turns Eastbound Left 0 Thru 0 Right 0 Westbound Left 129 0.60 215 1 L 215 Thru 492 0.82 600 1 LT 600 .0.00 Right 130 0.76 1 R Northbound Left 508. 0.87 584 2 L 584 Thru 2794 0.97 2880 2 TR 2880 Right 40 0.88 0 Submitted into the public Southbound recor In�,,��c��onnection with 4;L=!_ Left 43 0.71 61 1 L 61 item on 4U Thru 1780 0.98 1816 2 T 1816 Walter Foeman Right 504 0.90 1 R City Clerk * Value entered by user. SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORRSHEET Appri Ideal Adj Lane Sat f f f f f f f f_ f Sat Group Flow W HV G P BB A LU RT IT Flow Eastbound Sec LT Adj/LT Sat: Westbound Sec LT Adj/LT Sat: L 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.90 1.00 ---- 0.950 1624 LT 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.90 1.00 1.000 R 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.90 1.00 ---- Northbound Sec LT Adj/LT Sat: L 1900 1.000 0.980 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.90 0.97 ---- 0.950 3090 TR 1900 1.000 0.980 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.90 0.95 1.000 Southbound Sec LT Adj/LT Sat: 0.075 129 L 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.90 1.00 ---- 0950 1624 T 1900 • 1.000 0.980 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.90 0.95 1.000 R 1900 1.000 0.980 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.90 1.00 FUTURE.doc 2 -1a�a 0.- CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Adj Adj Sat Flow Green --Lane Group-- Appr/ Lane • Flow Rate Flow Rate Ratio Ratio Capacity v/c Mvmt Group (v) (s) (v/s) (g/C) (c) Ratio Eastbound Pri. Sec. Left Thru Right Westbound Pri. Sec. Left L 215 1624 0.13 0.174 282 0.76 Thru LT 600 0.174 Right R 0.174 Northbound Pri. Sec. Left L 584 3090 0.19 0.287 887 0.66 Thru TR 2880 0.426 Right Southbound Pri. 61 1624 0.04 0.278 452 0.13 Sec. 0 129 0.00 0.461 63 0.00 Left L 61 0.739 515 0.12 Thru T 1816 0.426 Right R 0.426 Sum (v/s) critical - 0.00 Lost Time/Cycle, L = 0.00 sec Critical v/c(X) = 0.00 LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEET Appr/ Ratios Unf Prog Lane Incremental Res Lane Group Approach Lane Del Adj Grp Factor Del Del Grp v/c g/C dl Fact Cap k d2 d3 Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound Submitted into the public Westbound recor in connec ion with. Item 11--� on L 0.76 0.174 45.2 1.000 282 0.31 12.5 0.0 57.8 E LT 0.174 1.000 0.0 57.8 E Walter Foeman R 0.174 1.000 0.0 City Clerk Northbound L 0.66 0.287 36.0 1.000 887 0.23 1.8 0.0 37.9 D TR 0.426 1.000 0.50 0.0 37.9 D Southbound L 0.12 0.739 31.1 1.000 515 0.11 0.1 0.0 31.2 C T 0.426 1.000 0.50 0.0 31.2 C R 0.426 1.000 0.50 0.0 Intersection Delay = 42.4 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = D SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED LT WORKSHEET for exclusive lefts FUTURE.doc 3 APPROACH EB Cycle Length, C 115.0 sec • Actual Green Time for Lane Group, G Effective Green Time for Lane Group, g Opposing Effective Green Time, go Number of Lanes in Lane Group, N Number of Opposing Lanes, No Adjusted Left -Turn Flow Rate, Vlt Proportion of Left Turns in Opposing Flow, Plto Adjusted Opposing Flow Rate, Vo Lost Time for Lane Group, tl Left Turns per Cycle: LTC=V1tC/3600 Opposing Flow per Lane, Per Cycle: Volc=VoC/3600fluo Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo (Table 9-2 or Eqn 9-7) gf=[Gexp(- a * (LTC ** b))]-tl, gf<=g Opposing Queue Ratio: qro=1-Rpo(go/C) gq=(4.943Volc**0.762)[(gro**1.061)-tl], gq<-g gu =g-gq if gq>=gf, =g-gf if gq<gf n=(gq-gf)/2, n>=0 Ptho=1-Plto P1*=Plt[l+{(N-1)g/(gf+gu/Ell+4.24))) Ell (Figure 9-7) E12=(17Ptho**n)/Plto, E12>=1.0 fmin=2(1+Plt)/g or fmin=2(1+P1)/g gdiff=max(gq-gf,0) fm=[gf/g]+[gu/g][1/{1+P1(Ell-1)}]. (min=fmin;max=1.00) flt=fm=[gf/g]+gdiff[1/{1+Plt(E12-1)}] • • WB NB SB 85.0 53.00 49.0 1 2 61 0.00 2880 4.00 1.95 48.42 1.00 0.0 0.57 53.00 0.00 26.50 1.00 1.00 24.35 1.00 0.08 0.00 0.08 +[gu/g][l/(l+Plt(Ell-1)],(min=fmin;max-1.0) or flt=[fm+0.91(N-1)]/N** fit 0.075 For special case of single -lane approach opposed by multilane approach, see text. * If P1>=1 for shared left -turn lanes with N>l, then assume de -facto left -turn lane and redo calculations. *+� For permitted left -turns with multiple exclusive left -turn lanes, flt=fm. For special case of multilane approach opposed by single -lane approach or when gf>gq, see text. SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED IT WORKSHEET .for shared lefts APPROACH Cycle Length, C 115.0 sec Actual Green Time for Lane Group, G Effective Green Time for Lane Group, g Opposing Effective Green Time, go Number of Lanes in Lane Group, N Number of Opposing Lanes, No Adjusted Left -Turn Flow Rate, Vlt Proportion of Left Turns in Lane Group, Pit Proportion of Left Turns in Opposing Flow, Pita Adjusted Opposing Flow Rate, Vo Lost Time for Lane Group, tl Left Turns per Cycle: LTC=V1tC/3600 Opposing Flow per Lane, Per Cycle: Volc=VoC/3600fluo Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo (Table 9-2 or Eqn. 9-7) gf=[Gexp(- a * (LTC ** b))]-tl, gf<=g Opposing Queue Ratio: qro=1-Rpo(go/C) gq=(4.943Volc**0.762)[(gro**1.061)-tl], gq<=g gu =g-gq if gq>=gf, =g-gf if gq<gf n=(gq7gf)/2, n>=0 Ptho=l-Plto P1*=Plt[l+{(N-1)9/(gf+gu/Ell+4.24))) Ell (Figure 9-7) E12=(1-Ptho**n)/Plto, E12>=1.0 fmin=2(1+Plt)/g or fmin=2(1+P1)/g gdiff=max(gq-gf,0) fm=[gf/g]+[gu/g][1/{1+P1(E11-1)}], (min=fmin;max=1.00) FUTURE.doc EB WB NB SB Submitted into the pu4HC recor i.n connection w1h item , N on .11:L=QV' Waiter Foeman City Clerk l 4 0 0— 1 d-pq A • fit =fm-[gf/g]+gdiff[1/{1+Plt(E12-1)}] +[gu/g][l/(1+Plt(Ell-1)],(min=fmin;max-1.0) or flt=[fm+0.91(N-1)]/N*= fit Primary For special case of single -lane approach opposed by multilane approach, see text. + If P1>=1 for shared left -turn lanes with N>1, then assume de -facto left -turn lane and redo calculations. �* For permitted left -turns with multiple exclusive left -turn lanes, flt=fm. For special case of multilane approach opposed by single -lane approach or when gf>gq, see text. SUPPLEMENTAL UNIFORM DELAY WORKSHEET EBLT WELT NBLT SBLT Adj. IT Vol from Vol Adjustment Worksheet, v 61 v/c ratio from Capacity Worksheet, X .0.00 Primary phase effective green, g 53.00 Secondary phase effective green, gq 53.00 (From Supplemental Permitted LT Worksheet), gu 0.00 Cycle length, C 115.0 Red=(C-g-gq-gu), r 30.0 Arrivals: v/(3600(max (X,1.0))), qa 0.02 Primary ph. departures: s/3600, sp 0.451 Secondary ph. departures: s(gq+gu)/(gu*3600), ss 53.00 XPerm . 9.99 Xprot 0.07 XCase 3 Queue at begining of green arrow, Qa 1.41 Queue at beginning of unsaturated green, Qu 0.90 Residual queue, Qr 0.90 Uniform Delay, dl 31.1 DELAY/LOS WORKSHEET WITH INITIAL QUEUE Initial Dur. Uniform Delay Initial Final Initial Lane Appr/ Unmet Unmet Queue Unmet Queue Group Lane Demand Demand Unadj. Adj. Param. Demand Delay Delay Group Q veh t hrs. ds dl sec u Q veh d3 sec d sec Eastbound Westbound Northbound Submitted into the public record in connection with Southbound itemTrz_6 on aL,1_6_::::�U Walter Foeman City Clerk Intersection Delay 42.4 sec/veh Intersection LOS D FUTURE.doc 5 00--1030 • • Jackson M. Ahlstedt Jackson M. Ahlstedt, P.E. Jackson M. Ahlstedt, P.E. 46 N.W. 94th Street Miami Shores, Florida 33150 Phone: (305) 754-8695 E-Mail: Intersection: City/State: Analyst: Project No: Time Period Analyzed: Date: East/West Street Name: North/South Street Name { Eastbound L T R I Volume 1 PHF PK 15 Vol I Hi Ln Vol { Grade 1 Ideal Sat 1 ParkExist l NumPark l % Heavy Veh{ No. Lanes I 0 0 0 LGConfig I Lane Width I RTOR Vol I Adj Flow I %InSharedLnl Prop Turns i NumPeds I NumBus 1 HCS: Signals Release 3.1 Fax: (305) 754-8695 OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS SE 7TH ST/MIAMI AVE MIAMI/FLORIDA J. AHLSTEDT PARK PLACE FUTURE W/O PROJECT PM PEAK 6/5/00 SE 7TH STREET MIAMI AVENUE VOLUME DATA Westbound ( Northbound ( Southbound L T R { L T R I L T R 1332 69 { 1783 I 440 1 0.80 0.75 10.74 0.83 { 416 23 1265 133 1 0 I I I 0 I 1900 1900 11900 1900 1 Ix X I 120 20 I 0 0 10 0 { 0 2 1 1 1 2 0 1 0 0 0 T R I L LT 1 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 1 0 1 I 1665 92 1763 805 1 126 I 10.34 I 0 1 I o 0 0 10 0 I Duration 1.00 Area Type: CBD or Similar OPERATING PARAMETERS Eastbound 1 Westbound 1 Northbound 1 Southbound I { L T R { L T R { L T R { L T R { t I Init Unmet { I { 0.0 0.0 I 10.0 0.0 I I I Arriv. Typel 1 3 3 13 3 I I Unit Ext. 1 J 3.0 3.0 13.0 3.0 I Factor I i 1.000 1 1.000 I 1 Lost Time { J 2.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 j I Ext of g 1 i 2.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 1 1 Ped Min g l 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 I PHASE DATA .q hmit eri intn _Ne public 2 3. 4 5 6 ri cec p RB connection with Phase Combination 1 l item on � EB Left I NB Left P Walter Foeman Right 1 Right City Clerk Peds { Ped FUTURE.doc 6 GO-R 4- 6 • U • • • WB Left Thru Right Peds NB Right SB Right P P Green 36.0 Yellow 4.0 All Red 1.0 Cycle Length: 80.0 SB Left Thru Right Ped EB Right I I WB Right I I 35.0 4.0 secs VOLUME ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET Adjusted Prop. Prop. Appr./ Mvt Flow No. Lane Floes Rate Left Right Movement Volume PHF Rate Lanes Group RTOR In Lane Grp Turns Turns Eastbound Left 0 Thru 0 Right 0 Westbound Left 0 Thru 1332 0.80 1665 2 T 1665 Right 69 0.75 92 1 R 0 92 Northbound Left 783 0.74 1058 1 L 783 Thru 440 0.83 530 2 LT 805 0.34 Right 0 Submitted into the public Southbound record in connection with Left 0 item -1`- on A:J Thru 0 Right 0 Walter Foemam * Value entered bV user. City Clerk SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET Appr/ Ideal Adj Lane Sat f f f f f f f f- f Sat Group Flow W HV G P BB A LU RT IT Flom Eastbound Sec LT Adj/LT Sat: Westbound Sec LT Adj/LT Sat: T 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.90 0.95 1.000 1.000 3249 R 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.90 1.00 0.850 ---- 1454 Northbound Sec LT Adj/LT Sat: L 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.800 1.000 0.90 1.00 ---- 0.950 1300 LT 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.900 1.000 0.90 0.95 1.000 0.983 2875 Southbound ftyftyi-Owl Sec LT Adj/LT Sat: 00-1036 7 • • CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Adj Adj Sat Flow Green --Lane Group-- Appr/ Lane Flow Rate Flow Rate Ratio Ratio Capacity v/c Mvmt Group (v) (s) (v/s) (g/C) (c) Ratio Eastbound Pri. Sec. Left Thru Right Westbound Pri. Sec. Left Thru T Right R Northbound Pri. Sec. Left L Thru IT Right Southbound Pri. Sec. Left Thru Right 1665 3249 # 0.51 0.450 1462 1.14 92 1454 0.06 0.450 654 0.14 783 1300 # 0.60 0.438 569 1.38 805 2875 0.28 0.438 1258 0.64 Sum (v/s) critical = 1.11 Lost Time/Cycle, L = 8.00 sec Critical v/c(X) = 1.24 LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEET Appr/ Ratios Unf Prog Lane Incremental Res Lane Group Approach Lane Del Adj , Grp Factor Del Del Grp v/c g/C dl Fact Cap k d2 d3 Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound Westbound T 1.14 0.450 22.0 1.000 1462 0.50 259.7 0.0 281.7 F 281.7 F R 0.14 0.450 12.9 1.000 654 0.50 0.5 0.0 13.4 B Northbound L 1.38 0.438 22.5 1.000 569 0.50 688.4 0.0 710. F IT 0.64 0.438 17.6 1.000 1258 0.50 2.5 0.0 20. I �at8_nittE3tO1Jr7tNo Fthe public record with Southbound jiin��connection item � - J on •U Walter Foeman City Clerk Intersection Delay = 311.8 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = F 0 SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED IT WORKSHEE•T for exclusive lefts FUTURE.doc 8 APPROACH EB Cycle Length, C 80.0 sec • Actual Green Time for Lane Group, G Effective Green Time for Lane Group, g Opposing Effective Green Time, go Number of Lanes in Lane Group, N Number of Opposing Lanes, No Adjusted Left -Turn Flow Rate, Vlt Proportion of Left Turns in Opposing Flow, Plto Adjusted Opposing Flow Rate, Vo Lost Time for Lane Group, tl Left Turns per Cycle: LTC=V1tC/3600 Opposing Flow per Lane, Per Cycle: Volc=VoC/3600fluo Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo (Table 9-2 or Eqn 9-7) gf=[Gexp(- a * (LTC ** b))]-tl, gf<=g Opposing Queue'Ratio: qro=1-Rpo(go/C) gq=(4.943Volc**0.762)[(gro**1.061)-tl], gq<=g gu =g-gq if gq>=gf, =g-gf if gq<gf n=(gq-gf)/2, n>=0 Ptho=1-Plto P1*=Plt[1+{(N-1)g/(gf+gu/Ell+4.24))) Ell (Figure 9-7) E12=(1-Ptho**n)/Plto, E12>=1.0 fmin-2(1+Plt)/g or fmin=2(1+P1)/g . gdiff=max(gq-gf,0) fm=[gf/g]+[gu/g][1/{1+P1(Ell-1)}], (min=fmin;max=1.00) flt=fm=[gf/g]+gdiff[1/{1+Plt(E12-1)}] WB NB SB +[gu/g][l/(l+Plt(Ell-1)•],(min=fmin;max=1.0) or flt=[fm+0.91(N-1)]/N** fit For special case of single -lane approach opposed by multilane approach, see text. If P1>=1 for shared left -turn lanes with N>1, then assume de -facto • left -turn lane and redo calculations. ** For permitted left -turns with multiple exclusive left -turn lanes, flt=fm. For special case of multilane approach opposed by single -.lane approach or when gf>gq, see text. SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED LT WORKSHEET for shared lefts APPROACH EB Cycle Length', C 80.0 sec Actual Green Time for Lane Group, G Effective Green Time for Lane Group, g Opposing Effective Green Time, go Number of Lanes in Lane Group, N Number of Opposing Lanes, No Adjusted Left -Turn Flow Rate, Vlt Proportion of Left Turns in Lane Group, Pit Proportion of Left Turns in Opposing Flow, Plto Adjusted Opposing Flow Rate, Vo Lost Time for Lane Group, tl Left Turns per Cycle: LTC=V1tC/3600 Opposing Flow per Lane, Per Cycle: Volc=VoC/3600fluo Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo (Table 9-2 or Eqn 9-7) gf=[Gexp(- a * (LTC ** b))]-tl, gf<=g Opposing Queue Ratio: qro=l-Rpo(go/C) gq=(4.943Volc**0.762)[(gro**1.061)-tl], gq<=g gu =g-gq if gq>=gf, -g-gf if gq<gf n=(gq-gf)/2, n>=0 Ptho=l=Plto P1*=Plt[1+{(N-1)9/ligf+gu/$11+4.24))) Ell (Figure 9-7) E12=(1-Ptho**n)/Plto, E12>=1.0 fmin=2(1+Plt)/g or fmin=2(1+P1)/g gdiff=max(gq-gf,0) fm=[gf/g]+[gu/g][1/{1+P1(Ell-1)}], (min=fmin;max=1.00) FUTURE.doc WB NB SB Submitted into the public record in connection with items --Lon )lam/ G_­ry Walter Foeman City Clerk 0-10-36 • 0 flt=fm-[gf/g]+gdiff[1/{1+Plt(E12-1)}] +[gu/g][1/(l+Plt(Ell-1)],(min=fmin,max-1.0) or flt=[fm+0.91(N-1)]/N** flt Primary For special case of single -lane approach opposed by multilane approach, see text. * If P1>=1 for shared left -turn lanes with N>1, then assume de -facto left -turn lane and redo calculations. ** For permitted left -turns with multiple exclusive left -turn lanes, flt=fm. For special case of multilane approach opposed by single -lane approach or when gf>gq, see text. SUPPLEMENTAL UNIFORM DELAY WORKSHEET EBLT WBLT NBLT SBLT Adj. LT Vol from Vol Adjustment Worksheet, v v/c ratio from Capacity Worksheet, X Primary phase effective green, g Secondary phase effective green, gq (From Supplemental Permitted IT Worksheet), gu Cycle length, C 80.0 Red=(C-g-gq-gu), r Arrivals: v/(3600(max (X,1.0))), qa Primary ph. departures: s/3600, sp Secondary ph. departures: s(gq+gu)/(gu*3600), ss XPerm XProt XCase Queue at begining of green arrow, Qa Queue at beginning of unsaturated green, Qu Residual queue, Qr Uniform Delay, dl DELAY/LOS WORKSHEET WITH INITIAL QUEUE Initial Dur. Uniform Delay Initial Final Initial Lane Appr/ Unmet Unmet Queue Unmet Queue Group Lane Demand Demand Unadj. Adj. Param. Demand Delay Delay Group Q veh t hrs. ds dl sec u Q veh d3 sec d sec Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Intersection Delay 311.8 sec/veh Intersection LOS F Submitted into the public recoUZ212 onnection with item On llr --od FUTURE.doc Walter Foeman 10 City Clerk 66-1636 • • • Jackson M. Ahlstedt Jackson M. Ahlstedt, P.E. Jackson M. Ahlstedt, P.E. 46 N.W. 94th Street Miami Shores, Florida 33150 Phone: (305) 754-8695 E-Mail: Intersection: City/State: Analyst: Project No: Time Period Analyzed: Date: East/West Street Name: North/South Street Name: HCS: Signals Release 3.1 Fax: (305) 754-6695 OPERATIONAL ANALYSI SE 8TH ST/BRICKELL AVE MIAMI/FLORIDA J. AHLSTEDT PARK PLACE FUTURE W/O PROJECT PM PEAK 6i5i00 SE 8TH STREET BRICKELL AVENUE VOLUME DATA I Eastbound I Westbound { Northbound I Southbound L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R Volume 1563 551 365 1457 t PHF 10.83 0.80 0.64 10.90 PK 15 Vol 1170 172 143 1127 Hi Ln Vol % Grade 1 0 1 Ideal Sat 11900 1900 J1900 ParkExist I 1 NumPark I % Heavy Veh12 2 2 I2 No. Lanes 1 2 2 0 1 2 LGConfig I L TR I L Lane Width 112.0 12.0 112.0 RTOR Vol I I Adj Flow 1678 689 1508 %InSharedLnl I Prop Turns I I NumPeds 1 50 1 NumBus 10 0 10 853 1 0.94 { 227 I I 0 1 1900 I I I 2 0 1 i 0 R I 12.0 I I I 50 0 I Duration 1.00 Area Type: CBD or Similar OPERATING PARAMETERS 2645 293 1342, 1620 0.93 0.84 10.86 0.88 711 87 199 460 0 1 0 1900 1900 11900 1900 I I 2 2 12 2 2 1 1 2 3 0 T R I L T 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 1 2844 (398 .1841 I I 50 1 0 0 10 0 I Eastbound I Westbound ( Northbound I Southbound I I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I Init Unmet 10.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 I I 0.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 Arriv. Type13 3 13 3 I 3 3 13 3 I Unit Ext. 13.0 3.0 13.0 3.0 1 3.0 3.0 13.0 3.0 1 I Factor 1 1.000 1 1.000 { 1.000 1 1.000 1 Lost Time 12.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 1 2.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 I Ext of g 12.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 1 2.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 1 Ped Min g 1 0.0 1 0.0 { 0.0 1 0.0 i PHASE DATA h� the public Uiu u Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 FecordB in connection With EB Left A 1 NB Left Left item On ���� ® Thru A I Thru P Walter FOernan Right A I Right P City Clerk Peds I Ped FUTURE.doe 11 00r10I ej • WB Left A I SB Left A Thru I Thru A P Right A I Right Peds I Ped NB Right I EB Right I SB Right I WB Right I Green 24.0 10.0 8.0 55.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 3.0 4.0 All Red 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 Cycle Length: 115.0 secs VOLUME ADJUSTMENT WORKSIIEET Adjusted Prop. Prop. Appr.i Mvt Flow No. Lane Flow Rate Left Right Movement Volume PHF Rate Lanes Group RTOR In Lane Grp Turns Turns Eastbound Left 563 0.83 678 2 L 678 Thru 551 0.80 689 2 TR 689 Right 365 0.64 0 Westbound Left 457 0.90 508 2 L 508 Thru 0 Right 853 0.94 1 R Northbound Left 0 Thru 2645 0.93 2844 2 T 2844 Right 293 0.84 1 R Submitted into the publ&G Southbound Left 342 0.86 398 2 L 398 reco d in conne tion with Thru Right 0 1620 0.88 1841 T 1841 Iten f Gn %� +� Value entered by user. " Walter Foeman City Cleric SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET Appri Ideal Adj Lane Sat f f f f f f f f_ f Sat Group Flow W HV G P BB A LU RT LT Flow Eastbound Sec LT Adj/LT Sat: L 1900 1.000 0.980 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.90 0.97 ---- 0.950 3090 TR 1900 1.000 0.980 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.90 0.95 1.000 Westbound Sec LT Adj/LT Sat: L 1900 1.000 0.980 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.90 0.97 ---- 0.950 3090 R 1900 1.000 0.980 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.90 1.00 ---- Northbound Sec LT Adj/LT Sat: T 1900 1.000 0.980 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.90 0.95 1.000 R 1900 1.000 0.980 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.90 1.00 ---- Southbound Sec LT Adj/LT Sat: 0 L 1900 1.000 0.980 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.90 0.97 ---- 0950 3090 T 1900 1.000 0.980 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.90 0.91 1.000 1.000 4577 FUTURE.doc 12 CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Adj Adj Sat Flow Green --Lane Group-- 91 Appr/ Lane Flow Rate Flow Rate Ratio Ratio Capacity v/c Mvmt Group (v) (s) (v/s) (g/C) (c) Ratio Eastbound Pri. Sec. Left L 678 3090 0.22 0.209 645 1.05 Thru TR 689 0.209 Right Westbound Pri. Sec. Left L 508 3090 0.16 0.087 269 1.89 Thru Right R 0.087 Northbound Pri: Sec. Left Thru T 2844 0.478 Right R 0.478 Southbound Pri. Sec. Left L 398 3090 0.13 0.070 215 1.85 Thru T 1841 4577 0.40 0.574 2627 0.70 Right Sum (v/s) critical = 0.00 Lost Time/Cycle, L = 0.00. sec Critical v/c(X) = 0.00 LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEET Appr/ Ratios Unf Prog Lane Incremental Res Lane Group Approach Lane Del Adj Grp Factor Del Del Grp v/c g/C dl Fact Cap k d2 d3 Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 1.05 0.209 45.5 1.000 645 0.50 132.1 0.0 177.6 F TR 0.209 1.000 0.0 177.6 F Westbound L 1.89 0.087 52.5 1.000 269 0.50 0.0 R 0.0$7 1.000 0.0 Submitted Northbound into the public record in connection with item T 0.478 1.000 0.50 0.0 anLL R 0.478 1.000 0.50 0.0 Walter Foeman Southbound City Cleric L 1.85 0.070 53.5 1.000 215 0.50 0.0 T 0.70 0.574 17.5 1.000 2627 0.27 0.9 0.0 18.3 B 18.3 B Intersection Delay = 61.2 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = E SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED LT WORKSHEET for exclusive lefts FUTURE.doc 13 • • APPROACH EB Cycle Length, C 115.0 sec Actual Green Time for Lane Group, G Effective Green Time for Lane Group, g Opposing Effective Green Time, go Number of Lanes in Lane Group, N Number of Opposing Lanes, No Adjusted Left -Turn Flow Rate, Vlt Proportion of Left Turns in Opposing Flow, Pita Adjusted Opposing Flow Rate, Vo Lost Time for Lane Group, tl Left Turns per Cycle: LTC=V1tC/3600 Opposing Flow per Lane, Per Cycle: Volc=VoC/3600fluo Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo (Table 9-2 or Eqn 9-7) gf=[Gexp(- a * (LTC ** b))]-tl, gf<=g Opposing Queue Ratio: qro=1-Rpo(go/C) gq=(4.943Volc**0.762)[(gro**1.061)-tl], gq<=g gu =g-gq if gq>=gf, =g-gf if gq<gf n=(gq-gf)/2, n>=0 Ptho=1-Plto Pl*=Plt[1+{(N-1)g/(gf+gu/Ell+4.24))) Ell (Figure 9-7) E12=(1-Ptho**n)/Plto, E12>=1.0 fmin=2(1+Plt)/g or fmin=2(1+P1)/g gdiff=max(gq-gf,0) (min=fmin;max=1.00) flt=fm=[gf/g]+gdiff[l/{1+Plt(E12-1)}] WB NB SB +[gu'/g][1/(1+Plt(Ell-1)],(min=fmin;max=1.0) or flt=[fm+0.91(N-1)]/N** fit For special case of single -lane approach opposed by multilane approach, see text. * If P1>=1 for shared left -turn lanes with N>l, then assume de -facto left -turn lane and redo calculations. ** For permitted left -turns with multiple exclusive left -turn lanes, flt=fm. For special case of multilane approach opposed by single -lane approach or when gf>gq, see text. SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED LT WORKSHEET for shared lefts APPROACH EB WB NB SB Cycle Length, C 115.0 sec Actual Green Time for Lane Group, G Effective Green Time for Lane Group, g Opposing Effective Green Time, go Number of Lanes in Lane Group, N Number of Opposing Lanes, No Adjusted Left -Turn Flow Rate, Vlt Proportion of Left Turns in Lane Group, Pit Proportion of Left Turns in Opposing Flow, Pita Adjusted Opposing Flow Rate, Vo Lost Time for Lane Group, tl Left Turns per Cycle: LTC=V1tC/3600 Opposing Flow per Lane, Per.Cycle: Volc=VoC/3600fluo Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo (Table 9-2 or Eqn 9-7) gf=[Gexp(- a * (LTC ** b))]-tl, gf<=g Opposing Queue Ratio: qro-l-Rpo(go/C) gq=(4.943Volc**0.762)[(gro**1.061)-tl], gq<=g gu =g-gq if gq>-gf, -g-gf if gq<gf Submitted into the liC n=(gq-gf)/2, n>=0 record in Ptho=1-Plta GGNneC'titDiith with P1*=Plt[l+{(N-1)9/(gf+gu/Ell+4.24))) an Ell (Figure 9-7) E12=(1-Ptho**n)/Plto, E12>=1.0 WalterF©eman fmin=2(1+Plt)/g or fmin=2(1+P1)/g gdiff=max(gq-gf,0) C� Cie fm=[gf/g]+[gu/g][1/{1+P1(Ell-1)}], (min=fmia;max-1.00) FUTURE. doc 14 ®-10'Ju • flt=fm=[gf/g]+gdiff[1/{1+Plt(E12-1))] +[gu/g][l/(l+Plt(Ell-1)],(min=fmin:max-1.0) or flt=[fm+0.91(N-1)]/N}" flt Primary For special case of single -lane approach opposed by multilane approach, see text. If P1>=1 for shared left -turn lanes with N>l, then assume de -facto left -turn lane and redo calculations. For permitted left -turns with multiple exclusive left -turn lanes, flt=fm. For special case of multilane approach opposed by single -lane approach or when gf>gq, see text. SUPPLEMENTAL UNIFORM DELAY WORKSHEET EBLT WBLT NBLT SBLT Adj. LT Vol from Vol Adjustment Worksheet; v v/c ratio from Capacity Worksheet, X Primary phase effective green, g Secondary phase effective green, gq (From Supplemental Permitted IT Worksheet), gu Cycle length, C 115.0 Red-(C-g-gq-gu), r Arrivals: v/(3600(max(X,1.0))), qa Primary ph. departures: s/3600. sp Secondary ph. departures: s(gq+gu)/(gu*3600), ss XPerm XProt XCase Queue at begining of green arrow, Qa Queue at beginning of unsaturated green, Qu Residual queue, Qr Uniform Delay, dl DELAY/LOS WORKSHEET.WITH INITIAL QUEUE Initial Dur. Uniform Delay Initial Final Initial Lane Appr/ Unmet Unmet Queue Unmet Queue Group Lane Demand Demand Unadj. Adj. Param. Demand Delay Delay Group Q veh t hrs. ds dl sec u Q veh d3 sec d sec Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Submitted into the public record in connection with itempzzL/ L on G�ur Walter Foeman City Clerk Intersection Delay 61.2 sec/veh Intersection LOS E FUTURE.doc 15 00_1UU 0 C7 • • Jackson M. Ahlstedt Jackson M. Ahlstedt, P.E. Jackson M. Ahlstedt, P.E. 46 N.W. 94th Street Miami Shores, Florida 33150 Phone: (305) 754-8695 E-Mail: Intersection: City/State: Analyst: Project No: Time Period Analyzed: Date: East/West Street Name: North/South Street Name: I Eastbound L T R I Volume 1279 799 PHF 10.90 0.87 PK 15 Vol 178 230 Hi Ln Vol I % Grade 1 0 Ideal Sat 1 1900 ParkExist IX X NumPark 120 20 % Heavy VehJ5 2 No. Lanes 1 0 3 0 LGConfig I IT Lane Width 1 12.0 RTOR Vol I Adj Flow 1 1228 %InSharedLnl Prop Turns 10.25 NumPeds I NumBus 1 0 HCS: Signals Release 3.1 Fax: (305) 754-8695 OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS SE 8TH ST/MIAMI AVE MIAMI/FLORIDA J. AHLSTEDT PARK PLACE FUTURE W/O PROJECT PM PEAK 6/5/00 SE 8TH STREET MIAMI AVENUE VOLUME DATA Westbound L T R 0 0 0 n ( Northbound I Southbound L T R I L T R I I 1 900 79 1 1 0.72 0.83 J 1 312 24 i I I I 0 I J 1900 I IX X 1 120 0 0 01 1 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 1 TR I 1 12.0 1 i I I 1250 I I I I I I 0 I I 0 I Duration 1.00 Area Type: CBD or Similar OPERATING PARAMETERS I Eastbound 1 Westbound { Northbound I Southbound I { L T R { L T R { L T R I L T R { I Init Unmet 1 0.0 i I { I 0.0 I I { 1 Arriv. Typel 3 1 1 3 1 1 Unit Ext. 1 3.0 1 1 3.0 1 1 I Factor I 1.000 I I 1.000 I { Lost Time { 2.0 I I 2.0 I. I Ext of g { 2.0 1 1 2.0 { 1 Ped Min g { 0.0 PHASE DATA RIabmitted intn the public reCo701 in connection with Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 item �6-j. on I_LaL�—c�L EB Left P J. NB Left Walter Foeman Thru P I Thru P Right 1 Right P Clty Clerk Peds { Ped FUTURE.doc 16 • WB Left Thru • Right Peds NB Right SB Right Green 28.0 Yellow 4.0 All Red 0.0 Cycle Length: 80.0 SB Left Thru Right Ped I EB Right I I WB Right I 44.0 4.0 0.0 secs VOLUME ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET Adjusted Prop. Prop. Appr./ Mvt Flow No. Lane Flow Rate Left Right Movement Volume PHF Rate Lanes Group RTOR In Lane Grp Turns Turns Eastbound Left 279 0.90 310 0 Thru 799 0.87 918 3 LT 1228 0.25 Right 0 Westbound Left 0 Thru 0 Right 0 Northbound Left 0 Thru 900 0.83 1250 3 TR 1250 Submitted Into the Public Right 79 0.83 0 Southbound Item reco in connection with Left 0 on •������ Thru D Walter Foeman Right 0 City Clerk * Value entered by user. SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET Appri Ideal Adj Lane Sat f f f f f f f f- f Sat Group Flow W HV G P BB A LU RT LT Flow Eastbound Sec IT Adj/LT Sat: LT 1900 1.000 0.980 1.000 0.900 1.000 0.90 0.91 1.000 0.988 4068 Westbound Sec IT Adj/LT Sat: Northbound Sec IT Adj/LT Sat: TR 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.900 1.000 0.90 0.91 1.000 Southbound Sec LT Adj/LT Sat: FUTURE.doc 17 �0-1036 CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Adj Adj Sat Flow Green --Lane Group-- Appr/ Lane Flow Rate Flow Rate Ratio Ratio Capacity v/c Mvmt Group (v) (s) (v/s) (g/C) (c) Ratio Eastbound Pri. Sec. Left Thru LT 1228 4068 0.30 0.350 1424 0.86 Right Westbound Pri. Sec. Left Thru Right Northbound Pri. Sec. Left Thru TR 1250 0.550 Right Southbound Pri. Sec. Left Thru Right Sum (v/s) critical = 0.00 Lost Time/Cycle, L = 0.00 sec Critical v/c(X) = 0.00 LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEET Appr/ Ratios Unf Prog Lane Incremental Res Lane Group Approach Lane Del Adj Grp Factor Del Del Grp v/c g/C dl ' Fact Cap k d2 d3 Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound LT 0.86 0.350 24.2 1.000,1424 0.50 7.7 0.0 31.9 C 31.9 C Westbound Northbound Submitted into the record in Public TR 0.550 1.000 0.50 0.0 item C nne„1on with Southbound Walter FOeman City Clerk Intersection Delay = 31.9 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED IT WORKSHEET for exclusive lefts FUTURE.doc 18 60-1036 • E APPROACH EB Cycle Length, C 80.0 sec • Actual Green Time for Lane Group, G Effective Green Time for Lane Group, g Opposing Effective Green Time, go Number of Lanes in Lane Group, N Number of Opposing Lanes, No Adjusted Left -Turn Flow Rate, Vlt Proportion of Left Turns in Opposing Flow, Plto Adjusted Opposing Flow Rate, Vo Lost Time for Lane Group, tl Left Turns per Cycle: LTC=V1tC/3600 Opposing Flow per Lane, Per Cycle: Volc=VoC/3600fluo Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo (Table 9-2 or Eqn 9-7) gf=[Gexp(- a * (LTC ** b))]-tl, gf<=g Opposing Queue Ratio: qro=1-Rpo(go/C) gq=(4.943Volc**0.762)[(gro**1.061)-tl], gq<=g gu =g-gq if gq>=gf, =g-gf if gq<gf n=(gq-gf)/2, n>=0 Ptho=1-Plto P1*=Plt[1+{(N-1)g/(gf+gu/Ell+4.24))) Ell (Figure 9-7) E12=(1-Ptho**n)/Plto, E12>=1.0 fmin=2(1+Plt)/g or fmin=2(1+P1)/g gdiff=max(gq-gf,C) fm=[gf/g]+[gu/g][1/{1+P1(Ell-1)1], (min=fmin;max=1.00) flt=fm=[gf/g]+gdiff[i/{1+Plt(E12-1)1] WB NB SB +[gu/g][1/(1+Plt(Ell-1)),(min=fmin;max=1.0) or flt=[fm+0.91(N-1)]/N** fit For special case of single -lane approach opposed by multilane approach, see text. * If P1>=1 for shared left -turn lanes with N>1, then assume de -facto left -turn lane and redo calculations. ' ** For permitted left -turns with multiple exclusive left -turn lanes, flt=fm. For special case of multilane approach opposed by single -lane approach or when gf>gq, see text. SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED LT WORKSHEET for shared lefts APPROACH EB Cycle Length, C 80.0 sec Actual Green Time for Lane Group, G Effective Green Time for Lane Group, g Opposing Effective Green Time, go Number of Lanes in Lane Group, N Number of Opposing Lanes, No Adjusted Left -Turn Flow Rate, Vlt Proportion of Left Turns in Lane Group, Pit Proportion of Left Turns in Opposing Flow, Plto Adjusted Opposing Flow Rate, Vo Lost Time for Lane Group, tl Left Turns per Cycle: LTC=V1tC/3600 Opposing Flow per Lane, Per Cycle: Volc=VoC/3600fluo Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo (Table 9-2 or Eqn 9-7) gf=[Gexp(- a * (LTC **-b))]-tl, gf<=g Opposing Queue Ratio: qro=1-Rpo(go/C) gq=(4.943Volc**0.762)[(gro**1.061)-tl], gq<=g gu =g-gq if gq>=gf, =g-gf if gq<gf n=(gq-gf)/2, n>=0 Ptho=1-Plto Pl*=Plt[l+{(N-1)9/tSf+gu/E11+4.24))) Ell (Figure 9-7) E12=(1-Ptho**n)/Plto, E12>=1.0 • fmin=2(1+Plt)/g or fmin=2(1+P1)/g gdiff=max(gq-gf,0) fm=[gf/g]+[gu/g][1/{1+P1(E11=1)1], (min=fmin;max=1.00) FUTURE.doc WB NB SB SubMitted into the public 'ec®r in connection with item/LL on � Walter Foeman City Clerk 19 0-1036 flt=fm=[gf/g]+gdiff[1/{1+Plt(E12-1)}] +[gu/g][1/(1+PIt(Ell -1)],(min=fmin;max=1.0) or flt=[fm+0.91(N-1)]/N-- flt Primary • For special case of single -lane approach opposed by multilane approach, see text. +� If Pl>=1 for shared left -turn lanes with N>l, then assume de -facto left -turn lane and redo calculations. For permitted left -turns with multiple exclusive left -turn lanes, flt=fm. For special case of multilane approach opposed by single -lane approach or when gf>gq, see text. SUPPLEMENTAL UNIFORM DELAY WORKSHEET EBLT WBLT NBLT SBLT Adj. LT Vol from Vol Adjustment Worksheet, v v/c ratio from Capacity Worksheet, X Primary phase effective green, g Secondary phase effective green,gq (From Supplemental Permitted IT Worksheet), gu Cycle length, C 80.0 Red-(C-g-gq-gu), r Arrivals: v/(3600(max(X,1.0))), qa Primary ph. departures: s/3600, sp Secondary ph. departures: s(gq+gu)/(gu*3600), ss XPerm XProt XCase Queue at begining of green arrow. Qa Queue at beginning of unsaturated green, Qu Residual queue, Qr Uniform Delay, dl DELAY/LOS WORKSHEET WITH INITIAL QUEUE • Initial Dur. Uniform Delay Initial Final Initial Lane Appr/ Unmet Unmet Queue Unmet Queue Group Lane Demand Demand Unadj. Adj. Param. Demand Delay Delay Group Q veh t hrs. ds dl sec u Q veh d3 sec d sec • Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Intersection Delay 31.9 sec/veh FUTURE.doc Submitted into the public record in connection with itemf on Waiter Foeman City Clerk Intersection LOS C 20 HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 3.1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANAL`ISIS Apalyst: J. AHLSTEDT Intersection: S 13TH ST AND MIAMI AVE Count Date: FUTURE W/O PROJECT Time Period: PM PK Intersection Orientation: North -South Major St, Vehicle Volume Data: Movements: 1 2 3 7 8 9 10 11 12 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Volume: 0 362 0 303 0 10 17 0 11 HFR: 0 483 0 365 0 20 23 0 22 PHF: 1.00 0.75 1,00 0.83 1.00 0.50 0,75 1.00 0.50 PHV: -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Pedestrian Volume Data: Movements: Flow: Lane width: Walk speed: % Blockage: Median Type: None # of vehicles: 0 Flared approach Movements: # of vehicles: Eastbound 0 # of vehicles: Westbound 0 Lane usage for movements 1,2&3 approach: . Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- N N Y Y N N Y Y Y Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 4,5&6 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R --------------------------------------- N N N -------------------------------------- N N N N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 7,8&9 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- N N N N N N N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 10,11&12 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 L T R L T R -------N------N -----N------N ----N------N--- Channelized: N Grader 0.00 Upstream Signal Data: ---------------------------------------------------- FUTURE. doc Lane 3 L T R N------N-----N public record in connection with itenl; L on 1�LC_-cr Walter Foernan - 00-10,CD 0 00 Approach:Southbound L prot T 0 isDistance: Progression Speed: 0 Cycle Length: 0 Green Time: 0 0 Arrival Type: 3 3 Saturation Flow Rate: 1700 1700 Progressed Flow: 0 0 • Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles Northbound Southbound Shared In volume, major th vehicles: 362 0 Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: 0 0 Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: 1700 1700 Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: 1700 1700 Number of major street through.lanes: 1 0 Length of study period, hrs: 1.00 -------------------------------------------------------- Worksheet 4 Critical Gap and Follow-up time calculation Critical Gap Calculations: Movement 1 7 8 9 10 11 12 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- t c,base 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 t c,hv 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 P by 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t c,g 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 G 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t 3,1t 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 t c,T: 1 stage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t c 1 stage 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Follow Up Time Calculations: Movement 1 7 8 9 10 it 12 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- t f,base 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 t f,HV 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 P by 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t f ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 Worksheet 5a. Effect of Upstream Signals (Computation 1) Movement 2 Queue Clearance Time at Upstream Signal: ------------------------------------------------------------- V prog Total Saturation Flow Rate, s (vph) Arrival 'Type Effective Green g eff (sec) Cycle Length, C (sec) Rp (from table 9-2) Proportion of vehicles arriving on green P g ql g q2 G q Submitted into the public recor in connection with item on 1J=L Walter Foeman --------------------Sity fa # --- Worksheet 5b, Effect of upstream signals (computation 2) Movement 2 Proprtion of time blocked ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- alpha 0.550 beta 0.645 t a 6.803 F 0,293 f FUTLTRE.doc 22 - IU 36 V c,max V c,min t p p 0.000 ------------------------------------------ ----------------------------------------------------- Worksheet 5c. Effect of upstream signals (computation 3) Platoon Event Periods Result ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- p2 0.000 p5 0.000 p dom 0.000 p subdom 0.000 Constranined? F Proportion unblocked for minor movements, px (1) 1 stage ---------------------------------------------- pi 1.000 ------------------------------------------------ p4 1.000 p7 1.000 p8 1.000 p9 1.000 plo 1.000 pll 1.000 p12 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1.000 • • Worksheet 5d. Effect of upstream signals (computation 4). Movement -------------------------------------------------------------- 1 stage 1 7 8 9 10 it 12 V c,x 0 494 483 483 493 483 0 s 1900 1900 1900 1900 0 0 0 Px 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 V c.u.x 0 494 483 483 493 483 0 Worksheet 5e. Effect of upstream signals (computation 5) Movement ------------------------------------------------ 7----------------------------------------- 1 stage 1 7 8 9 10 11 12 ----=------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Px 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 C r,x 0 489 486 588 490 486 0 C plat,x 0 489 486 588 490 486 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Worksheet 6 Impedance and capacity equations Step 1: RT from Minor St. Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Movement Capacity Probability of Queue free St. -------------------------------------------- Step 2: LT from Major St. -------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Movement Capacity Probability of Queue free St. Maj. L Shared ln. Prob. Queue Free St. -------------------------------------------- Step 3: TH from Minor St. -------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows FUTURE.doc 9 12 ------------------------------------------------ 483 0 588 0 1.00 1.00 588 0 0.97 0.00 ------------------------------------------------ 9l ---- ---------------- v'le v i o oe�-intoe public orecord in connection with 1.0 ooitem iLLL 0.00 0.00 Walter Foeman ------------------------------------------Cif Clerk 6 11 ----- --------------------------------- 483 483 23 0®-i0�,6 [7 • • i • Potential Capacity 486 486 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.00 0.00 Movement Capacity 0 0 Probability of Queue freeSt- ----------------0_-_-_ _ 00 0.00 Step 4: LT from Minor St. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 7 10 Conflicting Flows 494 493 Potential Capacity 489 490 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.00 0.00 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.00 0.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.00 0.00 Movement Capacity -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0 0 Worksheet 10 delay,queue length, and LOS Movement 1 4 ---------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------- 7 8 9 10 11 12 v(vph) C m(vph) 1090 vic 95% queue length Control Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Worksheet 11 Shared Major LT Impedance and Delay Rank 1 Delay Calculations Movement 2 5 ________________________________________________________________________________ P of 0.00 1.00 V it 362 0 V i2 0 0 S it 1700 1700 S i2 1700 1700 P* Oj 0.00 1.00 D maj left 0.0 0.0 N number major st lanes 1 0 Delay. rank 1 mvmts 0.0 0.0 FUTURE.doc Submitted into the pubtto recor in connection with item f'� on Walter Foeman City Clerk 24 00-10"36 C� Jackson M. Ahlstedt Jackson M. Ahlstedt, P.E. Jackson M. Ahlstedt, P.E. 46 N.W. 94th Street Miami Shores, Florida 33150 Phone: (305) 754-6695 E-Mail: HCS: Signals Release 3.1 Fax: (305) 754-8695 OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Intersection: SW 13TH ST\SW 1ST AVE City/State: MIAMI/FLORIDA Analyst: J. AHLSTEDT Project No: PARK PLACE Time Period Analyzed: PM PK HR - FUTURE W/0 PROJECT Date: 6/5/00 East/West Street Name: SW 13TH STREET North/South Street Name: SW 1ST AVENUE VOLUME DATA 1 Eastbound ( Westbound Northbound ( Southbound I L T R i L T R I L T R I L T R I Volume l I 1444 ( 170 0 26 I 1139 152 371 713 49 133 PHF 1 0.89 0.69 10.75 0.85 10.58 0.90 0.72 10.74 0.68 0.89 PK 15 Vol 1 200 18 (11 425 130 0 9 147 56 104 Hi Ln Vol I I I I % Grade 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 Ideal Sat l 1900 I 1900 l 1900 11900 1900 1900 ParkExist 1 I I I Nark Heavy Vehl B 0 10 0 10 0 0 10 0 0 No. Lanes 1 0 2 0 ( 0 2 0 ( 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 LGConfig 1 TR 1 LT ( LTR I L T R Lane Width i 12.0 i 12.0 I 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 Vol 0 0 0 Addj Flow I 872 ( 1743 1 157 1188 224 417 %InSharedLnl I I I Prop Turns 1 0.06 10.03 10.77 0.23 l NumPeds ( 0 1 1 0 ( 0 NumBus I 0 1 0 1 0 10 0 0 Duration 1.00 Area Type: All other areas OPERATING PARANMRS Eastbound 1 Westbound 1 Northbound 1 Southbound 1 I L T R I L T R I L T R l L T R 1� 10.0 s c �e Init Unmet 1 0.0 j 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 E Arriv. Typel 3 I 3 1 3 13 3 3 Im a V Unit Ext. 1 3.0 1 3.0 1 3.0 13.0 3.0 3.0 1a 0 I LL I Factor ( 1.000 I 1.000 1 1.000 1 1.000 Lost Time l 2.0 I 2.0 ( 2.0 12.0 2.0 2.0 C Est of g 1 2.0 i 2.0 1 2.0 12.0 2.0 2.0 Ip C ® co 3:: Ped Min g 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 I 0.0 1- o _ C.) PHASE DATA Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left 1 NB Left A v E Thru P I Thru A `aa Right P Peds FUTME.doc Right A Pod 25 0- I 00V 0 • WB Left P I SB Left A Thru P I Thru A Right I Right A Peds • I Ped NB Right I EB Right SB Right I I NIB Right I I Green 33.0 Yellow 4.0 Al Red 0.0 Cycle Length: 60.0 Appr.i Mvt Movement Volume PHF 19.0 4.0 0.0 secs VOLUME ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET Adjusted Prop. Prop. Flow No. Lane Flow Rate Left Right Rate Lanes Group RTOR In Lane Grp Turns Turns Eastbound Left 0 Thru 713 0.89 801 2 TR 872 0.08 Right 49 0.69 71 0 0 Westbound Left 33 0.75 44 0 Thru 1444 0.85 1699 2 LT 1743 0.03 Right 0 Northbound Left 70 0.58 121 0 Thru 0 0.90 0 1 LTR 157 0.77 0.23 Right 26 0.72 36 0 0 Southbound Submitted into the LeftThru 139 152 0.74 0.68 188 224 1 1 L T 188 224 recorW, in public connection with Right 371 0.89 417 1 R 0 417 I$em on Value entered by user. Waiter Foeman ("Ihf f;;ark SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET Appri Ideal Adj Lane Sat f f f f f f f £ f Sat Group Flow W HV G P BB A LU RT LT Flow Eastbound Sec LT Adj/LT Sat: TR 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 0.95 0.988 1.000 3566 Westbound Sec IT Adj/LT Sat: LT 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 0.95 1.000 0.913 3298 Northbound Sec LT Adj/LT Sat: LTR 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 1.00 0.869 0.491 811 Southbound Sec LT Adj/LT Sat: L 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 1.00 ---- 0558 1061 T 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.000 1.000 1900 R 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 1.00 0.850 - 1615 FUTURE.doc 26 0®-1036 i 0 CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Adj Adj Sat Flow Green --Lane Group-- Appr/ Lane Flow Rate Flow Rate Ratio Ratio Capacity v/c Mvmt Group (v) (s) (v/s) WC) (c) Ratio Eastbound Pri. Sec. Left Thru TR 872 3566 0.24 0.550 1961 0.44 Right Westbound Pri. Sec. Left Thru IT 1743 3298 # 0.53 0.550 1814 0.96 Right Northbound Pri. Sec. Left Thru LTR 157 811 0.19 0.317 257 0.61 Right Southbound Pri. Sec. Left L 188 1061 0.18 0.317 336 0.56 Thru T 224 1900 0.12 0.317 602 0.37 0 s -;z> c .� Right R 417 1615 # 0.26 0.317 511 0.82 = = 0 N U Sum (v/s) critical = 0.79 c i0 Lost Time/Cycle, L = 6.00 sec Critical v/c(X) = 0.87 ► ` LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEET coCz Appr/ Ratios Unf Prog Lane Incremental Res Lane Group Approach v Lane Del Adj Grp Factor Del Del J Grp v/c g/C d1 Fact Cap k d2 d3 Delay LOS Delay LOS a? C ) Eastbound 6' TR 0.44 0.550 8.0 1.000 1961 0.50 0.7 0.0 8.8 A 8.8 A U) Westbound IT 0.96 0.550 12.9 1.000 1814 0.50 19.2. 0.0 32.0 C 32.0 C Northbound LTR 0.61 0.317 17.4 1.000 257 0.20 4.3 0.0 21.7 C 21.7 C Southbound L 0.56 0.317 17.0 1.000 336 0.16 2.1 0.0 19.1 B T 0.37 0.317 15.9 1.000 602 0.11 0.4 0.0 16.3 B 17.6 B R 0.82 0.317 18.9 1.000 511 0.36 10.8 0.0 29.7 C Intersection Delay = 23.3 (sec/veh) . Intersection LOS - C SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED LT WORKSHEET for exclusive lefts FLULME.doc 27 66-10136 APPROACH EB WB NB SB Cycle Length, C 60.0 sec Actual Green Time for Lane Group, G Effective Green Time for Lane Group, g 19.0 19.00 Opposing Effective Green Time, go 19.0 Number of Lanes in Lane Group. N 1 Number of Opposing Lanes, No 1 Adjusted Left -Turn Flow Rate, Vlt 188 Proportion of Left Turns in Opposing Flow, Plto 0.77 Adjusted Opposing Flow Rate, Vo 157 Lost Time for Lane Group, tl 4.00 Left Turns per Cycle: LTC=V1tC/3600 3.13 Opposing Flow per Lane, Per Cycle: Volc=VoC/3600fluo 2.62 Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo (Table 9-2 or Eqn 9-7) 1.00 gf=[Gexp(- a * (LTC ** b))]-tl, gf<=g 0.0 Opposing Queue Ratio: qro=1-Rpo(go/C) 0.68 gq-(4.943Volc**0.762)[(gro**1.061)-tl], gq<-g 2.87 gu -g-gq if gq>=g£, =g-gf if gq<gf 16.13 n=(gq-gf)/2, n>=0 1.43 Ptho=l-Plto 0.23 P1*=Plt[l+{(N-1)g/(gf+gu/Ell+4.24))) 1.00 Ell (Figure 9-7) 1.52 E12=(1-Ptho**n)/Plto, E12>=1.0 1.14 fmin=2(1+Plt)/g or fmin=2(1+P1)/g 0.21 gdiff=max(gq-gf,0) 2.87 fm=[gf/g]+[gu/g][1/11+P1(Ell-1)1], (min=fmin;max=1.00) 0.56 flt=fm=[gf/g]+gdiff[1/{1+Plt(E12-1)1) +[gu/g][1/(1+Plt(Ell-1)],(min=fmin;max=1.0) or flt=[fm+0.91(N-1)]/N** fit 0.558 For special case of single -lane approach apposed by multilane approach, see text. * If P1>=1 for shared left -turn lanes with N>l, then assume de -facto left -turn lane and redo calculations. ** For permitted left -turns with multiple exclusive left -turn lanes, flt=fm. For special case of multilane approach opposed by single -lane approach or when gf>gq. see text. SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED LT WORKSHEET for shared lefts APPROACH EB Cycle Length, C 60.0 sec Actual Green Time for Lane Group, G Effective Green Time for Lane Group, g Opposing Effective Green Time, go Number of Lanes in Lane Group, N Number of Opposing Lanes, No Adjusted Left -Turn Flow Rate, Vlt Proportion of Left Turns in Lane Group, Pit Proportion of Left Turns in Opposing Flow, Plto Adjusted Opposing Flow Rate, Vo Lost Time for Lane Group, tl Left Turns per Cycle: LTC-V1tC/3600 Opposing Flow per Lane, Per Cycle: Volc=VoC/3600fluo Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo (Table 9-2 or Eqn 9-7) gf-[Gexp(- a * (LTC ** b))]-tl, gf<-g Opposing Queue Ratio: qro-l-Rpo(go/C) gq-(4.943Volc**0.762)[(gro**1.061)-tl], gq<=g gu =g-gq if gq>=gf, =g-gf if gq<gf n=(gq-gf)/2, n>=0 Ptho=l-Plto P1*=Plt[l+{(N-1)g/(gf+gu/Ell+4.24))) Ell (Figure 9-7) E12-(1-Ptho**n)/Plto, E12>=1.0 fmin=2(1+Plt)/g or fmin=2(1+P1)/g is gdiff=max(gq-gf,0) fm=[gf/g]+[gu/g][1/{1+P1(Ell-1)1]. (min=fmin;max=1.00) FUTURE. doc WB NB SB 33.0 19.0 33.00 19.00 33.0 19.0 Z 1 2 44 1 121 2 t Z == ca 0.03 0.77 E - U 0.00 0.00 CZ C 372 224 A) O I LL 4.00 4.00 C-) 0.73 2.02 0 C C ca 7.65 3.73 c a O - 29 1.00 1.00 V 12.3 0.4 a 0.45 0.68 4 .c 5.24 5.00 20.71 14.00 0.00 2.29 V 1.00 1.00 v� 0.06 0.77 3.45 1.74 1.00 1.00 0.06 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.92 0.49 28 00-I036 flt-fm=[gf/g]+gdiff[1/{1+Plt(E12-1)}] +[gu/g][1/(l+Plt(Ell-1)],(min=fmin;max=1.0) or flt=[fm+0.91(N-1)]/N** flt Primary 0.913 0.491 ® For special case of single -lane approach opposed by multilane approach, see text. If Pl>=1 for shared left -turn lanes with N>1, then assume de -facto left -turn lane and redo calculations. # For permitted left -turns with multiple exclusive left -turn lanes, flt=fm. For special case of multilane approach opposed by single -lane approach or when gf>gq, see text. SUPPLEMENTAL UNIFORM DELAY WORKSHEET EBLT WBLT NBLT SBLT Adj. LT Vol from Vol Adjustment Worksheet, v v/c ratio from Capacity Worksheet, X Primary phase effective green, g Secondary phase effective green, gq (From Supplemental Permitted LT Worksheet), gu Cycle length, C 60.0 Red-(C-g-gq-gu), r Arrivals: v/(3600(max(X,1.0))), qa Primary ph. departures: s/3600, sp Secondary ph. departures: s(gq+gu)/(gu}3600); ss XPerm XProt XCase Queue at begining of green arrow, Qa Queue at beginning of unsaturated green, Qu Residual queue, Qr Uniform Delay, dl DELAY/LOS WORKSHEET WITH INITIAL QUEUE • Initial Dur. Uniform Delay Initial Final Initial Lane Appr/ Unmet Unmet Queue Unmet Queue Group Lane Demand Demand Unadj. Adj. Param. Demand Delay Delay Group Q veh t hrs. ds dl sec u Q veh d3 sec d sec Eastbound 0 Westbound Northbound Submitted into the public reCoin connection Sorthbound Item �L� on Walter Foeman City Clerk Intersection Delay 23.3 sec/veh Intersection LOS C FUTURE.doc 29 • r-� U Jackson M. Ahlstedt Jackson M. Ahlstedt, P.E. Jackson M. Ahlstedt, P.E. 46 N.W. 94th Street Miami Shores, Florida 33150 Phone: (305) 754-6695 E-Mail: HCS: Signals Release 3.1 Fax: (305) 754-6695 OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Intersection: 13TH ST\S MIAMI AVE City/State: MIAMI/FLORIDA Analyst: J. AHLSTEDT Project No: PARK PLACE Time Period Analyzed: PM PK HR - FUTURE Wi0 PROJECT Date: 6/S/00 East/West Street Name: SW 13TH STREET North/South Street Name: SOUTH MIAMI AVENUE VOLUME DATA Eastbound ( Westbound ( Northbound I Southbound I I L T R { L T R I L T R I L T R { Volume 1165 562 88 135 1274 163 197 265 67 118 159 263 { PHF 10.74 0.90 0.59 10.65 0.91 0.78 10.81 0.81 0.S4 10.67 0.78 0.81 1 PK 15 Vol 156 156 37 113 350 52 130 82 31 17 51 81 { Hi Ln Vol I I I I I Grade 1 0 1 Ideal Sat 11900 1900 1 1900 1 1900 1 1900 1 ParkExist I I I I I N/. Heavy Veh10 0 0 10 0 0 10 0 0 10 0 0 I No. Lanes 1 0 2 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 2 0 I LGConfig I Deft TR I LTR I LTR I LTR 1 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 1 12.0 1 12.0 1 12.0 1 RTOR Vol 1 0 I 0 1 0 1 0 1 Adj Flow 1223 773 1 1663 1 571 1 556 %InSharedLn{ { I I 1 Prop Turns 10.00 0.19 10.03 0.13 10.21 0.22 10.05 0.58 1 NumPeds 1 0 1 0 I 0 1 0 I NumBus 10 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 I Duration 1.00 Area Type: All other areas OPERATING PARAMETERS 1 Eastbound I Westbound 1 Northbound I Southbound I I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I I I I I I Init Unmet 10.0 0.0 1 0.0 ( 0.0 1 0.0 i Arriv. Type13 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 Unit Ext. 13.0 3.0 1 3.0 i 3.0 1 3.0 I I Factor 1 1.000 ( 1.000 ( 1.000 ( 1.000 1 Lost Time 12.0 2.0 { 2.0 1 2.0 1 2.0 1 Ext of g 12.0 2.0 1 2.0 ( 2.0 1 2.0 1 Ped Min g 1 0.0 J 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 I PHASE DATA_ Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 Sub�itte� Into ree®rd�Jin�c� the public NB Left A �"`G-'L--,�OnneCtlOn With EB Left P I item Thru P ( Thru A on Right P I Right A Walter F Peds { Ped Oeman FUTURE.doc Cit3�OCler ( 0-s • WB Left P I SB Left A Thru P I Thru A Right P l Right A Peds ® I ped NB Right I EB Right SB Right I I WB Right I I Green 33.0 Yellow 4.0 All Red 1.0 Cycle Length: 60.0 17.0 4.0 1.0 secs _VOLUME ADJUSTMENT WORASHEET Adjusted Prop. Prop. Appr./ Mvt Flow No. Lane Flow Rate Left Right Movement Volume PHF Rate Lanes Group RTOR In Lane Grp Turns Turns Eastbound Left 165 0.74 223 0 DefL 223 Thru 562 0.90 624 2 TR 773 0.00 0.19 Right 88 0.59 149 0 0 Westbound V Left 35 0.65 54 0 c Thru 1274 0.91 1400 2 LTR 1663. 0.03 0.13 E Right 163 0.78 209 0 0 c1 C a)U Northbound -2).Q 1 LLO Left 97 0.81 120 0 c O ` V Thru 265 0.81 327 2 LTR 571 0.21 0.22 O C cis Right . 67 0.54 124 0 0 c O O Southbound V '0 Left 18 0.67 27 0 ?= - Thru .159 0.78 204 2 LTR 556 0.05 0.58 Right 263 0.81 325 0 0 G * Value entered by user. SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET Appr/ Ideal Adj Lane Sat f f f f f f f f- f Sat Group Flow W HV G P BB A LU RT LT Flow Eastbound Sec LT Adj/LT Sat: DefL 1900 1.000 1.000 ---- 1.00 ---- TR 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 1.00 0.971 1.000 1845 Westbound Sec LT Adj/LT Sat: LTR 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 0.95 0.981 0.908 3215 Northbound Sec LT Adj/LT Sat: LTR 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 0.95 0.967 0.652 2276 Southbound Sec LT Adj/LT Sat: LTR 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 0.95 0.912 0.912 3002 FUTURE.doc 31 00 06U CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Adj Adj Sat Flow Green --Lane Group-- Appr/ Lane Flow Rate Flow Rate Ratio Ratio • Capacity v/c Mvmt Group (v) (s) (v/s) (g/C) (c) Ratio Eastbound Pri. Sec. Left Deft 223 0.000 Thru TR 773 1845 0.42 0.550 1015 0.76 Right Westbound Pri. Sec. Left J C Thru LTR 1663 3215 # 0.52 0.550 1768 0.94 � Right 1 � U QL p d ®LL Northbound m Pri. Sec. O G Left 0 O Thru LTR 571 2276 # 0.25 0.283 645 0.89 V Right a Southbound Pri. E Sec. c� Left co Thru LTR 556 3002 0.19 0.283 851 0.65 Right Sum (v/s) critical = 0.77 Lost Time/Cycle, L = 8.00 sec Critical v/c(X) = 0.87 LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEET - Appr/ Ratios Unf Prog Lane Incremental Res Lane Croup Approach Lane Del Adj Grp Factor Del Del Grp v/c g/C d1 Fact Cap k d2 d3 Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound DefL 0.000 1.000 0.0 TR 0.76 0.550 10.5 1.000 1015 0.50 5.6 0.0 16.0 B 16.0 B Westbound LTR 0.94 0.550 12.6 1.000 1768 0.50 14.2 0.0 26.8 C 26.8 C Northbound LTR 0.89 0.283 20.6 1.000 645 0.41 16.4 0.0 36.9 D 36.9 D Southbound LTR 0.65 0.283 18.9 1.000 851 0.23 1.8 0.0 20.7 C 20.7 C Intersection Delay = 25.2 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED IT WORKSHEET for exclusive lefts FUTURE.doc 32 APPROACH Cycle Length, C 60.0 sec ® Actual Green Time for Lane Group, G Effective Green Time for Lane Group, g Opposing Effective Green Time, go Number of Lanes in Lane Group, N Number of Opposing Lanes, No Adjusted Left -Turn Flow Rate, Vlt Proportion of Left Turns in Opposing Flow, Plto Adjusted Opposing Flow Rate, Vo Lost Time for Lane Group, tl Left Turns per Cycle: LTC=V1tC/3600 Opposing Flow per Lane, Per Cycle: Volc=VoC/3600fluo Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo (Table 9-2 or Eqn 9-7) gf=[Gexp(- a * (LTC ** b))]-tl, gf<=g Opposing Queue Ratio: qro=1-Rpo(go/C) gq=(4.943Volc**0.762)[(gro**1.061)-tl], gq<=g gu =g-gq if gq>=gf, -g-gf if gq<gf n=(gq-gf)/2, n>=0 Ptho=1-Plto P1*=Pit[l+1(N-1)g/(gf+gu/Ell+4.24))) Ell (Figure 9-7) E12=(1-Ptho**n)/Plto, E12>=1.0 fmin=2(1+Plt)/g or fmin=2(1+P1)/g gdiff-max(gq-gf,0) fm=[gf/g]+[gu/g][l/11+P1(Ell-1)1], (min=fmin:max=1.00) flt=fm=[gf/g]+gdiff[1/11+P1t(E12-1)}] EB WB NB SB 0.0 33.00 33.0 1 223 Submitted into the public 0.03reCOrd in connection with 0.00 on 3.72 Walter 14.59 Foemen 1.00 City Clerk 0.0 0.45 21.56 11.44 10.78 " 0.97 1.00 6.81 9.22 0.12 21.56 0.12 +[gu/g][l/(1+Plt(Ell-1)],(min=fmin:max=1.0) or flt=[fm+0.91(N-1)]/N** flt For special case of single -lane approach opposed by multilane approach, see text. * If Pl>=1 for shared left -turn lanes with N>l, then assume de -facto left -turn lane and redo calculations. ** For permitted left -turns with multiple exclusive left -turn lanes, flt-fm. For special case of multilane approach opposed by single -lane approach or when gf>gq, see text. SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED LT WORRSHEET for shared lefts APPROACH Cycle Length, C 60.0 sec Actual Green Time for Lane Group, G Effective Green Time for Lane Group, g Opposing Effective Green Time, go Number of Lanes in Lane Group, N Number of Opposing Lanes, No Adjusted Left -Turn Flow Rate, Vlt Proportion of Left Turns in Lane Group, Plt Proportion of Left Turns in Opposing Flow, Plto Adjusted Opposing Flow Rate, Vo Lost Time for Lane Group, tl Left Turns per Cycle: LTC=V1tC/3600 Opposing Flow per Lane, Per Cycle: Volc=VoC/3600fluo Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo (Table 9-2 or Eqn 9-7) gf=[Gexp(- a * (LTC ** b))]-tl, gf<=g Opposing Queue Ratio: qro=1-Rpo(go/C) gq=(4.943Volc**0.762)[(gro**1.061)-tl], gq<=g gu =g-gq if gq>=gf, -g-gf if gq<gf n=(gq-gf)/2, n>=0 Ptho=1-Plto P1*=Plt[l+1(N-1)g/(gf+gu/Ell+4.24))) Ell (Figure 9-7) E12=(1-Ptho**n)/Plto, E12>=1.0 fmin=2(1+Plt)/g or fmin=2(1+P1)/g gdiff=max(gq-gf,0) fm=[gf/g]+[gu/g][1/11+P1(Ell-1)1], (min=fmin.max=1.00) FUTURE. doc EB WB NB SB 33.0 17.0 17.0 33.00 17.00 17.00 33.0 17.0 17.0 2 2 2 2 2 2 54 120 27 0.03 0.21 0.05 0.00 0.05 0.21 773 556 571 4.00 4.00 4.00 0.90 2.00 0.45 6.44 4.88 5.01 1.00 1.00 1.00 10.6 0.0 6.3 0.45 0.72 0.72 3.38 4.35 4.62 22.43 12.65 10.66 0.00 2.17 0.00 1.00 0.95 0.79 0.08 0.59 0.10 3.00 2.50 2.54 1.00 2.11 1.00 0.07 0.19 0.13 0.00 4.35 0.00 0.91 0.39 0.91 33 Un - D W) flt=fm=[gf/g]+gdiff[1/{1+Plt(E12-1)}] +[gu/g][l/(l+Plt(Ell-1)],(min=fmin;max=1.0) or flt=[£m+0.91(N-1)]/N*} flt Primary 0.908 0.652 0.912 tFor special case of single -lane approach opposed by multilane approach. see text. * If Pl>=1 for shared left -turn lanes with N>1, then assume de -facto left -turn lane and redo calculations. ff For permitted left -turns with multiple exclusive left -turn lanes, flt=fm. For special case of multilane approach opposed by single -lane approach or when gf>gq, see text. SUPPLEMENTAL UNIFORM DELAY WORFSHEET EBLT WBLT NBLT SBLT Adj. LT Vol from Vol Adjustment Worksheet, v v/c ratio from Capacity Worksheet, X Primary phase effective green, g Secondary phase effective green, gq (From Supplemental Permitted LT Worksheet), gu Cycle length, C 60.0 Red=(C-g-gq-gu), r Arrivals: v/(3600(max(X,1.0))), qa Primary ph. departures: s/3600, sp Secondary ph. departures: s(gq+gu)/(gu*3600); ss XPerm XProt XCase Queue at begining of green arrow, Qa Queue at beginning of unsaturated green, Qu Residual queue, Qr Uniform Delay, dl DELAY/LOS WORKSHEET WITH INITIAL QUEUE • Initial Dur. Uniform Delay Initial Final Initial Lane Appr/ Unmet Unmet Queue Unmet Queue Group Lane Demand Demand Unadj. Adj. Param. Demand Delay Delay Group Q veh t hrs. ds dl sec u Q veh d3 sec d sec • Eastbound Westbound Northbound Submitted into the public record in connection with item Z_!y on Southbound Waiter Reman City Clerk Intersection Delay 25.2 sec/veh Intersection LOS C FUTURE—doc 34 �- 03K) • • • 0 • Jackson M. Ahlstedt Jackson M. Ahlstedt, P.E. Jackson M. Ahlstedt, P.E. 46 N.W. 94th Street Miami Shores, Florida 33150 Phone: (305) 754-86,95 E-Mail: Intersection: City/State: Analyst: Project No: Time Period Analyzed: Date: East/West Street Name: North/South Street Name: I Eastbound I L T R Volume 1395 195 239 PHF 10.80 0.76 0.92 PR 15 Vol 1123 64 65 Hi Ln Vol I % Grade 1 0 Ideal Sat )1900 1900 1900 ParkExist I NumPark I % Heavy Veh}0 0 0 No. Lanes I 1 1 1 LGConfig I L LT R Lane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vol I 0 Adj Flow 1494 257 260 %InSharedLnIO Prop Turns 10.00 NumPeds 1 0 NumBus 10 0 0 HCS: Signals Release 3.1 Fax: (305) 754-8695 OPERATIONAL ANALYSI SE 13TH ST\BRICKELL AVE MIAMI/FLORIDA J. AHLSTEDT PARK PLACE PM PK HR - FUTURE W/O PROJECT 6/5/00 SE 13TH STREET BRICKELL AVENUE VOLUME DATA Westbound L T R 1183 411 148 10.76 0.75 0.70 160 137 53 l I 0 )1900 1900 1900 I I 10 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 L T R 112.0 12.0 12.0 1 0 1241 S48 211 I I I o 10 0 0 Northbound L T R 1439 1795 111 10.91 0.88 0.60 1121 510 46 I l a 11900 I 1900 10 0 0 1 1 2 0 I L TR 112.0 12.0 1 0 1482 2225 1 1 0.08 10 0 0 } Southbound L T R 1 195 1862 744 10.74 0.94 0.88 132 495 211 1 1 0 11900 I 1900 1900 I 10 0 0 I 1 2 1 { L T R 112.0 12.0 12.0 1 0 1126 i 1961 845 I I 0 10 0 0 tI v s c IV co Duration 1.00 Area Type: All other areas OPERATING PARAMETERS as. .o 1 <D LL Q) U m } Eastbound I Westbound ( Northbound ( Southbound } c O } L T R } L T R I L T R I L T R } V Init Unmet 10.0 0.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 0.0- Arriv. Type13 3 3 13 3 3 13 3 13 3 3 1 Unit Ext. 13.0 3.0 3.0 I3.0 3.0 3.0 13.0 3.0 13.0 3.0 3.0 I E 0 I Factor 1 1.000 1 1.000 1 1.000 I 1.000 0 0 E Lost Time 12.0 2.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 2.0 1 (0 m Ext of g 12.0 2.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 2.0 1 Ped Min g 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 PHASE DATA Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left. A ) NB Left P Thru A I Thru P Right A I Right P Peds } Ped FUTURE.doc 35 WB Left A I SB Left P Thru A I Thru P Right A I Right P Peds I Ped NB Right I EB Right SB Right I I WB Right I Green 15.0 16.0 I 69.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 4.0 All Red 1.0 1.0 1.0 Cycle Length: 115.0 secs Appr./ MVt Movement Volume PHF VOLUME ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET Adjusted Prop. Prop. Flow No. Lane Flow Rate Left Right Rate Lanes Group RTOR In Lane Grp Turns Turns Eastbound Left 395 0.80 494 1 L 494 Thru 195 0.76 257 1 LT 257 0.00 Right 239. 0.92 260 1 R 0 260 Westbound Left 183 0.76 241 1 L 241 Thru 411 0.75 548 1 T 548 Right 148 0.70 211 1 R 0 211 Northbound Left 439 0.91 482 1 L 482 Thru 1795 0.88 2040 2 TR 2225 0.08 Right ill 0.60 185 0 0 Southbound Submitted into the Left 95 0.74 128 1 L 128 reco. Aubiic Thru 1862 0.94 1981 2 T 1981 in connection with Right 744 0.88 845 1 R 0 845 item - On l/r Value entered by user. Waiter Foeman SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET CitY Clerk Appr/ Ideal Adj Lane Sat f f f f f f f f- f Sat Group Flow W HV G P BB A LU RT LT Flow Eastbound Sec IT Adj/LT Sat: L 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 1.00 ---- 0.950 1805 LT 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.000 1.000 1900 R 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 1.00 0.850 ---- 1615 Westbound Sec LT Adj/LT Sat: L 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 1.00 ---- 0.950 1805 T 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.000 1.000 1900 R 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 1.00 0.850 ---- 1615 Northbound Sec LT Adj/LT Sat: L 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 1.00 ---- 0.058 110 TR 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 0.95 0.988 1.000 3565 Southbound Sec LT Adj/LT,Sat: L 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 1.00 ---- 0.058 110 is T 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 0.95 1.000 1.000 3610 R 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 1.00 0.850 ---- 1615 FUTURE.doc 36 00-IU36 CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Adj Adj Sat Flow Green --Lane Group-- Appr/ Lane Flow Rate Flow Rate Ratio Ratio Capacity v/c Mvmt Group (v) (s) (v/s) (g/C) (c) Ratio Eastbound Pri. Sec. Left L 494 1805 # 0.27 0.130 235 2.10 Thru LT 257 1900 0.14 0.130 248 1.04 Right R 260 1615 0.16 0.130 211 1.23 Westbound Pri. Sec. Left L 241 1805 0.13 0.139 251 0.96 Thru T 548 1900 # 0.29 0.139 264 2.08 Right R 211 1615 0.13 0.139 225 0.94 Northbound Pri. Sec. Left L 482 110 # 4.38 0.600 66 7.30 Thru TR 2225 3565 0.62 0.600 2139 1.04 Right Submitted into the public Southbound recor In connection with Pri. item on I � - d Sec. Left L 128 110 1.16 0.600 66 1.94 Waiter Foeman Thru T 1981 3610 0.55 0.600 2166 0.91 CitY Cleric Right R 845 1615 0.52 0.600 969 0.87 Sum (v/s) critical = 4.94 Lost Time/Cycle, L = 12.00 sec Critical v/c(X) = 5.52 LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEET Appr/ Ratios Unf Prog Lane Incremental Res Lane Group Approach Lane Del Adj Grp Factor Del Del Grp v/c g/C dl Fact Cap k d2 d3 Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 2.10 0.130 50.0 1.000 235 0.50 0.0 LT 1.04 0.130 50.0 1.000 248 0.50 153.5 0.0 203.5 F 203.5 F R 1.23 0.130 50.0 1.000 211 0.50 459.2 0.0 509.2 F Westbound L 0.96 0.139 49.2 1.000 251 0.47 77.8 0.0 126.9 F T 2.08 0.139 49.5 1.000 264 0.50 0.0 126.9 F R 0.94 0.139 49.0 1.000 225 0.45 67.6 0.0 116.8 F Northbound L 7.30 0.600 23.0 1.000 66 0.50 0.0 TR 1.04 0.600 23.0 1.000 2139 0.50 89.9 0.0 112.9 F 112.9 F Southbound L 1.94 0.600 23.0 1.000 66 0.50 0.0 T 0.91 0.600 20.4 1.000 2166 0.50 8.4 0.0 28.8 C 28.8 C R 0.87 0.600 19.3 1.000 969 0.50 12.0 0.0 31.3 C Intersection Delay = 105.9 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = F SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED IT WORKSHEET for exclusive lefts FUTURE.doc 37 APPROACH EB Cycle Length, C 115.0 sec Actual Green Time for Lane Group, G Effective Green Time for Lane Group, g Opposing Effective Green Time, go Number of Lanes in Lane Group, N Number of Opposing Lanes, No Adjusted Left -Turn Flow Rate, Vlt Proportion of Left Turns in Opposing Flow, Plto Adjusted Opposing Flow Rate, Vo Lost Time for Lane Group, tl Left Turns per Cycle: LTC=V1tC/3600 Opposing Flow per Lane, Per Cycle: Volc=VoC/3600fluo Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo (Table 9-2 or Eqn 9-7) gf=[Gexp(- a * (LTC ** b))]-tl, gf<=g Opposing Queue Ratio: qro=i-Rpo(go/C) gq-(4.943Volc**0.762)[(gro**1.061)-tl], gq<-g Su =g-gq if gq>=gf, =g-gf if gq<gf n=(gq-gf)/2, n>=0 Ptho-l-Plto P1*=Plt[1+{(N-1)g/(gf+gu/Ell+4.24))) Ell (Figure 9-7) E12=(1-Ptho**n)/Plto, E12>=1.0 fmin=2(1+Plt)/g or fmin=2(1+P1)/g gdiff=max(gq-gf,0) fm=[gf/g]+[gu/g][1/11+P1(Ell-1)1], (min=fmin;max=1.00) flt=fm=[gf/g]+gdiff[l/{l+Plt(E12-1)1] WB NB SB 69.0 69.0 69.00 69.00 69.0 69.0 1 1 2 2 482 128 0.00 0.00 1981 2225 4.00 4.00 15.40 4.09 33.31 37.41 1.00 1.00 0.0 0.0 0.40 0.40 59.33 69.00 9.67 0.00 29.66 34.50 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 9.45 12.18 1.00 1.00 0.06 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.06 +[gu/g][l/(1+Plt(Ell-1)],(min=fmin;max=1.0) or flt=[fm+0.91(N-1)]/N** flt 0.058 0.058 For special case of single -lane approach opposed by multilane approach, see text. * If P1>=1 for shared left -turn lanes with N>1, then assume de -facto ® left -turn lane and redo calculations. ** For permitted left -turns with multiple exclusive left -turn lanes, flt=fm. For special case of multilane approach opposed by single -lane approach or when gf>gq, see text. SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED LT WORKSHEET for shared lefts APPROACH EB Cycle Length, C 115.0 sec Actual Green Time for Lane Group, G Effective Green Time for Lane Group, g Opposing Effective Green Time, go Number of Lanes in Lane Group, N Number of Opposing Lanes, No Adjusted Left -Turn Flow Rate, Vlt Proportion of Left Turns in Lane Group, Pit Proportion of Left Turns in Opposing Flow, Plto Adjusted Opposing Flow Rate, Vo Lost Time for Lane Group, tl Left Turns per Cycle: LTC=V1tC/3600 Opposing Flow per Lane, Per Cycle: Volc=VoC/3600fluo Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo (Table 9-2 or Eqn 9-7) gf=[Gexp(- a * (LTC ** b))]-tl, gf<=g Opposing Queue Ratio: qro=l-Rpo(go/C) gq=(4.943Volc**0.762)[(gro**1.061)-tl], gq<=g gu =g-gq if gq>=gf, =g-gf if gq<gf n=(gq-gf)/2, n>=0 Ptho=1-Plto Pl*=Plt[l+{(N-1)9/(gf+gu/E11+4.24))) Ell (Figure 9-7) E12=(1-Ptho**n)/Plto, E12>=1.0 fmin=2(1+Plt)/g or fmin=2(1+P1)/g gdiff-max(gq-gf,0) fm=[gf/g]+[gu/g][1/11+P1(Ell-1)1], (min=fmin;max=1.00) FUTURE.doc Submitted record i Into the d1c�(?trn item Qjn, ,,OnnectiO on Walter Fo eman City C eik 38 -J0V 6 flt=fm-[gf/g]+gdiff[l/{l+Plt(E12-1)}] +[gu/91[1/(l+Plt(Ell-1)].(min=fmin;max=1.0) or flt=[fm+0.91(N-1)]/N** flt Primary ® For special case of single -lane approach opposed by multilane approach, see text. * If P1>=1 for shared left -turn lanes with N>l, then assume de -facto left -turn lane and redo calculations. *+� For permitted left -turns with multiple exclusive left -turn lanes, flt=fm. For special case of multilane approach opposed by single -lane approach or when gf>gq, see text. SUPPLEMENTAL UNIFORM DELAY WORKSHEET EBLT WBLT NBLT SBLT Adj. IT Vol from Vol Adjustment Worksheet, v v/c ratio from Capacity Worksheet, X Primary phase effective green, g Secondary phase effective green, gq (From Supplemental Permitted LT Worksheet), gu Cycle length, C 115.0 Red =(C-g-gq-gu), r Arrivals: v/(3600(max(X,1.0))), qa Primary ph. departures: s/3600, sp Secondary ph. departures: s(gq+gu)/(gu*3600), ss XPerm XProt XCase Queue at begining of green arrow, Qa Queue at beginning of unsaturated green, Qu Residual queue, Qr Uniform Delay, dl DELAY/LOS WORKSHEET WITH INITIAL QUEUE • Initial Dur. Uniform Delay Initial Final Initial Lane Appr/ Unmet Unmet Queue Unmet Queue Group Lane Demand Demand Unadj. Adj. Param. Demand Delay Delay Group Q veh t hrs. ds dl sec u Q veh d3 sec d sec Eastbound Westbound -Submitted into the Northbound record In CO public item JF�� /[, OR „�J� Itil Walter FOem Southbound 8r1 City Cleric Intersection Delay 105.9 sec/veh Intersection LOS F FUTURE.doc 39 U0-1036 ri • HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 3.1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS Analyst: J. AHLSTEDT Intersection: SW 4TH AVE AND 15TH RD Count Date: FUTURE W/O PROJECT Time Period: PM PK Intersection Orientation: East-West Major St. Vehicle Volume Data: Movements: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Volume: 2 52 10 39 173 22 5 8 23 70 133 9 HFR: 4 83 13 70 19i 35 12 14 33 92 153 18 PHF: 0.50 0,63 0,75 0.56 0.93 0.63 0,42 0.58 0.69 0.76 0.87 0.50 PHV: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Pedestrian Volume Data: Movements: ---------------------------------------------------------- Flow: Lane width: Walk speed: % Blockage: Median Type: Raised Curb # of vehicles: 0 Flared approach Movements: # of vehicles: Northbound 0 # of vehicles: Southbound 0 Lane usage for movements 1,20 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 L T R L T R ---------------------------------------------------- Y Y N N Y Y Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 4,5&6 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 L T R L T R L Lane 3 L T R ---------------- - ---------------------- ' N N COT tied into the public reco in connection with item � on ! Walter Foeman Lane 3 T R City Clerk ------------------------------------------- N N N L N Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles: FUTLTRE.doc Lane 3 T R N N Lane 3 T R N N 40 I L� Eastbound Shared In volume, major th vehicles: 26 Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: 0 Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: 1700 Sat flow ® rate, major rt vehicles: 1700 Number of major street through lanes: 2 Length of study period, hrs: 1.00 0 • -------------------------------------------------------- Worksheet 4 Critical Gap and Follow-up time calculation Critical Gap Calculations: Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 0 ----------------------------- Westbound 89 0 0 1700 ----------------------------- 2 11 12 t c,base 4.1 4.1 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 t c,hv 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 P by 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t c,g 0.2 0.2 011 0.2 0.2 0.1 G 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t 3,lt 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 t c,T: 1 stage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t c 1 stage 4.1 4.1 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 Follow Up Time Calculations: Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- t f,base 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 t f,HV 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1'0 1.0 1.0 1.0 P by 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t.f 2.2 2.2 3.5 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 Worksheet 6 Impedance and capacity equations Step 1: RT from Minor St. 9 12 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows 48 113 Potential Capacity 1017 925 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 1017 925 Probability of Queue free St. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0.97 0.98 Step 2: IT from Major St. 4 1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows 96 226 Potential Capacity 1510 1354 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 1510 1354 Probability of Queue free St. 0.95 1.00 Maj. L Shared In. Prob. Queue Free St. 1.00 1.00 --------------------------------------------------------------------DOnyi-6Taw tie-pubiic Step 3: TH from Minor St. 8 irecoi in connection With Conflicting Flows 463 45 OM on Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor 499 1.00 506 1.00 Walter Foemah Cap. Adj, factor due to Impeding mvmnt 1.00 1.00 CityC1e�{ Movement Capacity 498 505 Probability of Queue free St. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0.97 0.70 Step 4: IT from Minor St. 7 10 ------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows 409 7--------------------------------------- 404 Potential Capacity 532 536 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Maj. L; Min T Impedance factor 0.69 0.97 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.76 0.98 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.75 0.94 Movement Capacity ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 398 506 Worksheet 8 Shared Lane Calculations FUTURE. doc 41 66--1036 i • Shared Lane Calculations Movement ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 7 8 9 10 11 12 I-------------------II-------------------i I 112 II II I v(vph) 14 33 92 153 IS Movement Capacity 398 498 1017 506 505 925 Shared Lane Capacity ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 653 521 Worksheet 10 delay.queue length, and LOS Movement 1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4 7 I-------------------II-------------------I 8 9 10 11 12 v(vph) 4 70 I I 59 I( II 263 I 1 C m(vph) 1354 1510 653 521 V/c 0.00 0.05 0.09 0.50 95% queue length Control Delay 7.7 7.5 11.1 18.9 LOS A A B C Approach Delay 11.1 18.9 Approach LOS ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- B C Worksheet 11 Shared Major LT Impedance and Delay Rank 1 Delay Calculations Movement 2 5 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- P of 1.00 0.95 V it 26 89 V i2 0 0 S it 1700 0 S i2 1700 1700 P. 0j 1.00 1.00 D maj left 7.7 7.5 N number major st lanes 2 2 Delay. rank 1 mvmts------------0_0 ----------------------------- 0.0 --------------------------------------------------- • Submitted into the recor public Item connection with on Walter Foem n r;h, f";rar�' FUTURE.doc 42 00-IU36 Jackson M. Ahlstedt Jackson M. Ahlstedt, P.E. Jackson M. Ahlstedt, P.E. 46 N.W. 94th Street Miami Shores, Florida 33150 Phone: (305) 754-8695 E-Mail: �J �J Intersection: City/State: Analyst: Project No: Time Period Analyzed: Date: East/West Street Name: North/South Street Name ( Eastbound L T R I Volume 17 312 PHF 10.30 0.90 PK 15 Vol 16 87 Hi Ln Vol I % Grade 1 0 Ideal Sat J 1900 ParkExist J NumPark I % Heavy Veh10 0 No. Lanes 1 0 2 0 LGConfig I IT Lane Width I 12.0 RTOR Vol 1 Adj Flow 1 370 %InSharedLnl Prop Turns 10.06 NumPeds 1 NumBus 1 0 Duration 1.00 HCS: Signals Release 3.1 Fax: (305) 754-8695 OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS 15TH RD AND SW 1ST AVE MIAMI/FLA J. AHLSTEDT PARK PLACE FUTURE W/O PROJECT PM PK HR 4/8/00 15TH ROAD SW 1ST AVENUE VOLUME DATA ( Westbound ( Northbound I Southbound L T R I L T R I L T R I I i I 1 221 12 1 0.80 0.69 1 69 4 I I 0 J 1900 I { 0 I 0 1 0 2 0 I TR 1 12.0 I 0 i ( 293 I 1 I 0.06 I 0 1 1 0 1 1 138 54 1 10.95 0.82 1 136 16 1 I I I 0 I J 1900 J I I I I {0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 LR I 1 12.0 1 I 0 I I 211 I I I 10.69 0.31 1 0 1 0 I 0 I Area Type: All other areas OPERATING PARAMETERS ( Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound 1 L T R I L T R ( L T R I L T R { I Init Unmet 1 0.0 I I 0.0 I I I I 1 0.0 Arriv. Typel 3 1 3 I I 3 I Unit Ext. 1 3.0 1 3.0 J 1 3.0 J I Factor ( 1.000 ( 1.000 ( ( 1.000 I Lost Time I 2.0 1 2.0 ( I 2.0 1 Est of g 1 2.0 1 2.0 ( I 2.0 Ped Min g 1 0.0 I 0.0 I i 0.0 1 PHASE DATA Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 submitted into the public EB Left Thru A A J NB 1 Left Thru record in connection with Right I Right item/ On Peds FUTURE.doc 1 Ped Walter Feem43.n Clerk 10_1- WB Left I SB Left A Thru A I Thru Right A I Right A Peds I Ped NB Right I EB Right SB Right I WB Right I Green 42.0 8.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 Al Red 1.0 1.0 Cycle Length: 60.0 secs VOLUME ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET Adjusted Prop. Prop. Appr./ Mvt Flow No. Lane Flow Rate Left Right Movement Volume PHF Rate Lanes Group RTOR In Lane Grp Turns Turns Eastbound Left 7 0.30 23 0 Thru 312 0.90 347 2 IT 370 0.06 Right 0 Westbound Left 0 Thru 221 0.80 276 2 TR 293 0.06 Right 12 0.69 17 0 .0 Northbound Left 0 Thru 0 Right • 0 Sidil�lftPed Southbound Left 138 0.95 145 o Into the r��o�dlc,®nnect'on ubltc Thru 0 LR 211 �Witl'1 Right 54 0.82 66 0 0 /'' �� on Value entered by user. /alter Foeman CitY Cleric SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET Appr/ Ideal Adj Lane Sat f f f f f f f £ f Sat Group Flow W HV G P BB A LU RT LT Flow Eastbound Sec IT Adj/LT Sat: IT 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 0.95 1.000 0.931 3361 Westbound Sec LT Adj/LT Sat: TR 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 0.95 0.991 1.000 3579 Northbound Sec IT Adj/LT Sat: Southbound - Sec LT Adj/LT Sat: LR 1900 1.000 1.D00 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 1.00 0.858 0`967 1576 FUTURE.doc 44 0U-�.�36 CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Adj Adj Sat Flow Green --Lane Group-- Appr/ Lane Flow Rate Flow Rate Ratio Ratio Capacity v/c Mvmt Group (v) (s) (v/s) (g/C) (c) Ratio Eastbound Pri. Sec. Left Thru LT 370 3361 0.11 0.700 2353 0.16 Right Westbound Pri. Sec. Left Thru TR 293 3579 0.06 0.700 2505 0.12 Right Northbound Pri. Sec. Left Thru Right Southbound Pri. Sec. Left Thru LR 211 1576 0.13 0.000 0 0.00 Right Sum (v/s) critical = 0.00 Lost Time/Cycle, L 0.00 sec Critical v/c(X) = 0.00 LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSBEET Appr/ Ratios Unf Prog Lane Incremental Res Lane Group Approach Lane Del Adj Grp_ Factor Del Del Grp v/c g/C dl Fact Cap k d2 d3 Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound LT 0.16 0.700 3.0 1.000 2353 0.11 0.0 0.0 3.1 A 3.1 A Westbound TR 0.12 0.700 2.9 1.000 2505 0.11 0.0 0.0 3.0 A 3.0 A Northbound Submitted into the public recur in connection with item - c� on , Southbound Walter A"oemen LR 0.00 0.000 30.0 1.000 0 0.11 0.0 0.0 30.0 C 30.0 C^Ity (,It Intersection Delay - 9.5 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = A SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED IT WORKSHEET for exclusive lefts FUTiTRE.doc 45 ®a. U v IF - APPROACH EB Cycle Length, C 60.0 sec Actual Green Time for Lane Group, G Effective Green Time for Lane Group, g Opposing Effective Green Time, go Number of Lanes in Lane Group, N Number of Opposing Lanes, No Adjusted Left -Turn Flow Rate, Vlt Proportion of Left Turns in Opposing Flow. Plto Adjusted Opposing Flow Rate. Vo Lost Time for Lane Group, tl Left Turns per Cycle: LTC-V1tC/3600 Opposing Flow per Lane, Per Cycle: Volc=VoC/3600fluo Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo (Table 9-2 or Eqn 9-7) gf=[Gexp(- a * (LTC ** b))]-tl, gf<=g Opposing Queue Ratio: qro=1-Rpo(go/C) gq-(4.943Volc**0.762)[(gro**1.061)-tl], gq<=g gu =g-gq if gq>-gf, =g-gf if gq<gf n=(gq-gf)/2, n>=0 Ptho=1-Plto Pl*=Plt[1+{(N-1)g/(gf+gu/Ell+4.24))) Ell (Figure 9-7) E12-(I-Ptho**n)/Plto. E12>=1.0 fmin=2(1+Plt)/g or fmin=2(1+P1)/g gdiff=max(gq-gf,0) fm=[gf/g]+[gu/g][l/{1+P1(Ell-1)}], (min=fmin;max=1.00) flt=fm=[gf/g]+gdiff[l/{1+Plt(E12-1)}] WB NB SB +[gu/g][1/(1+Plt(Ell-1)],(min=fmin;max=1.0) or flt=[fm+0.91(N-1)]/N** fit For special case of single -lane approach opposed by multilane approach. see text. * If P1>=1 for shared left -turn lanes with N>l, then assume de -facto left -turn lane and redo calculations. ** For permitted left -turns with multiple exclusive left -turn lanes, flt=fm. ® For special case of multilane approach opposed by single -lane approach or when gf>gq, see text. SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED LT WORRSHEET for shared lefts APPROACH EB WB NB SB Cycle Length, C 60.0 sec Actual Green Time for Lane Group, G 42.0 Effective Green Time for Lane Group, g 42.00 Opposing Effective Green Time, go 42.0 Number of Lanes in Lane Group, N 2 Number of Opposing Lanes, No 2 Adjusted Left -Turn Flow Rate, Vlt 23 Proportion of Left Turns in Lane Group, Pit 0.06 Proportion of Left Turns in Opposing Flow, Plto 0.00 Adjusted Opposing Flow Rate, Vo 293 Lost Time for Lane Group, tl 4.00 Submitted Left Turns per Cycle: LTC=V1tC/3600 0.38 Gi Pecord «t0 the Opposing Flow per Lane, Per Cycle: Volc=VoC/3600fluo 2.57 - public Opposing Platoon Ratio. Rpo (Table 9-2 or Eqn 9-7) 1.00 Item�onnection With gf=[Gexp(- a * (LTC ** b))]-tl, gf<=g 23.0 0.39 on Opposing Queue Ratio: qro=1-Rpo(go/C) Walter gq=(4.943Volc**0.762)[(gro**1.061)-tl], gq<-g 0.00 Foemarr gu =g-gq if gq>=gf, =g-gf if gq<gf 19.04 C1ty n=(gq-gf)/2, n>=0 0.00 Clerk Ptho=l-Plto 1.00 Pl*=Plt[l+{(N-1)g/(gf+gu/E11+4.24))) 0.13 Ell (Figure 9-7) 1.90 E12=(17Ptho**n)/Plto. E12>=1.0 1.00 fmin=2(1+Plt)/g or fmin=2(1+P1)/g 0.05 gdiff-max(gq-gf,0) ® 0.00 fm=[gf/g]+[gu/g][1/{1+P1(Ell-1))], (min=fmin;max=1.00) 0.95 FUTURE.doc 46 00--1L ! • flt=fm=[g£/g]+gdiff[l/{l+Plt(E12-1)}] +[gu/g][l/(1+Plt(Ell-1)],(min=fmin;max=1.0) or flt=[fm+0.91(N-1)]/N*- flt Primary 0.931 . For special case of single -lane approach opposed by multilane approach, see text. * If P1>=1 for shared left -turn lanes with N>l, then assume de -facto left -turn lane and redo calculations. �* For permitted left -turns with multiple exclusive left -turn lanes, flt=fm. For special case of multilane approach opposed by single -lane approach or when gf>gq, see text. SUPPLEMENTAL UNIFORM DELAY WORKSHEET EBLT WBLT NBLT SBLT Adj. IT Vol from Vol Adjustment Worksheet, v v/c ratio from Capacity Worksheet, X Primary phase effective green, g Secondary phase effective green, gq (From Supplemental Permitted IT Worksheet), gu Cycle length, C 60.0 Red =(C-g-gq-gu), r Arrivals: v/(3600(max(X,1.0))), qa Primary ph. departures: s/3600, sp Secondary ph. departures: s(gq+gu)/(gu*3600), ss XPerm XProt XCase Queue at begining of green arrow, Qa Queue at beginning of unsaturated green, Qu Residual queue. Qr Uniform Delay, dl DELAY/LOS WORKSHEET WITH INITIAL QUEUE Initial Dur. Uniform Delay Initial Final Initial Lane 40 Appr/ Unmet Unmet Queue Unmet Queue Group Lane Demand Demand Unadj. Adj. Param. Demand Delay Delay Group Q veh t hrs. ds dl sec u Q veh d3 sec d sec C Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Intersection Delay 9.5 FUTURE.doc Submitted into the public reeor in oo���le ction vAth item`f roan Walter Foe man Clerk sec/veh Intersection LOS A 47 CJ • • Jackson M. Ahlstedt Jackson M. Ahlstedt, P.E. Jackson M. Ahlstedt, P.E. 46 N.W. 94th Street Miami Shores, Florida 33150 Phone: (305) 754-8695 E-Mail: HCS: Signals Release 3.1 Fax: (305) 754-8695 OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Intersection: SE 15TH RD AND MIAMI AVE City/State: MIAMI/FLA Analyst: J. AHLSTEDT Project No: PARK PLACE Time Period Analyzed: FUTURE W/O PROJECT PM PK HR Date: 6/5/00 East/West Street Name: SE 1STH ROAD North/South Street Name: S. MIAMI AVENUE VOLUME DATA I Eastbound ( Westbound ( Northbound ( Southbound 1 l L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I Volume. ill 203 247 161 139 26 189 106 35 122 224 19 1 PHF 10.50 0.81 0.86 10.82 0.93 0.46 10.81 0.87 0.73 10.63 0.70 0.61 1 PK 15 Vol 16 63 72 119 37 14 127 30 12 19 80 8 1 Hi Ln Vol I I I I ) % Grade 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 Ideal Sat 1 1900 j 1900 1 1900 1 1900 ) ParkExist . N%uark Heavy Vehl9 b 0 10 0 0 10 0 0 10 0 0 No. Lanes 1 0 2 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 2 0 1 LGConfig 1 LTR I LTR I LTR I LTR 1 Lane Width l 12.0 1 12.0 1 12.0 1 12.0 RTOR Vol 1 160 1 0 1 0 1 0 ) Adj Flow 1 374 1 280 1 280 1 386 1 %InSharedLnl I I I I Prop Turns 10.06 0.27 10.26 0.20 10.39 0.17 10.09 0.08 1 NumPeds 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 NumBus 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 Duration 1.00 Area Type: All other areas OPERATING PARAMETERS I Eastbound 1 Westbound I Northbound 1 Southbound 1 I L T R j L T R I L T R I L T R 1 I Init Unmet 1 0.0 I I 0.0 { 1 0.0 I I ( 0.0 1 Arriv. Typel 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 Unit Ext. 1 3.0 1 3.0 ) 3.0 1 3.0 1 I Factor 1 1.000 ( 1.000 I 1.000 1 1.000 1 Lost Time 1 2.0 1 2.0 i 2.0 1 2.0 1 Ext of g 1 2.0 1 2.0 1 2.0 1 2.0 Ped Min g 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 ( 0.0 1 PHASE DATA Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 OUbmitted it 0 the pubiio EB Left A ) NB Left A reCOA in connection with Thru A 1 Thru A jtem 1, on -v& Right A A Peds f Peaht Walter FOernan FUTURE.doc Dh/ Oprk ! 0 WB Left A ( SB Left A Thru A ( Thru A Right A ( Right A Peds I Ped NB Right ( EB Right SB Right ( WB Right I I Green 9.0 41.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 Al Red 1.0 1.0 Cycle Length: 60.0 secs VOLUME ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET Adjusted Prop. Prop. Appr.i Mvt Flow No. Lane Flow Rate Left Right Movement Volume PHF Rate Lanes Group RTOR In Lane Grp Turns Turns Eastbound Left 11 0.50 22 0 Thru 203 0.61 251 2 LTR 374 0.06 0.27 Right 247 0.86 101 0 160 Westbound Left 61 0.82 74 0 Thru 139 0.93 149 2 LTR 280 0.26 0.20 Right 26 0.46 57 0 0 Northbound Left 89 0.81 110 0 Thru 106 0.87 122 2 LTR 280 O�i9��1li0itja Right • 35 0.73 48 0 0 Into the public recerdinconnection with Southbound iternn '- Left 22 0.63 35 0 0n1�LC Thru 224 0.70 320 2 LTR 386 0.09 0.08 Waiter Foemaa Right 19 0.61 31 0 0 City clerk, Value entered by user. SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORRSHEET Appri Ideal Adj Lane Sat f f f f f f f f- f Sat Group Flow W HV G P BB A LU RT LT Flow Eastbound Sec LT Adj/LT Sat: LTR 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 0.95 0.959 0.920 3185 Westbound Sec LT AdjiLT Sat: LTR 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 0.95 0.969 0.686 2400 Northbound Sec LT Adj/LT Sat: LTR 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 0.95 0.974 0.737 2591 Southbound Sec LT Adj/LT Sat: • LTR 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 0.95 0.'988 0.915 3262 FUTURE. doc 49 CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Adj Adj Sat Flow Green --Lane Group-- Appr/ Lane Flow Rate Flow Rate Ratio Ratio Capacity v/c Mvmt Group (v) (s) (v/s) (g/C) (c) Ratio Eastbound Pri. Sec. Left Thru LTR 374 3185 # 0.12 0.150 478 0.78 Right Westbound Pri. Sec. Left Thru LTR 280 2400 0.12 0.150 360 0.78 Right Northbound Pri. Sec. Left Thru LTR 280 2591 0.11 0.683 . 17S1UbrT1&6& into Right the Public reCOr on connection Southbound Pri. item with on See. Walter Foeman Left Thru LTR 386 3262 # 0.12 0.683 2229 0.17 City Clerk Right Sum (v/s) critical = 0.24 Lost Time/Cycle, L = 8.00 sec Critical v/c(X) = 0.27 LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEET Appr/ Ratios Unf Prog Lane Incremental Res Lane Group Approach Lane Del Adj Grp Factor Del Del Grp v/c g/C dl Fact Cap k d2 d3 Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound LTR 0.76 0.150 24.6 1.000 478 0.33 8.8 0.0 33.3 C 33.3 C Westbound LTR 0.78 0.150 24.5 1.000 360 0.33 11.1 0.0 35.7 D 35.7 D Northbound LTR '0.16 0.683 3.4 1.000 1771 0.11 0.0 0.0 3.4 A 3.4 A Southbound LTR 0.17 0.683 3.4 1.000 2229 0.11 0.0 0.0 3.4 A 3.4 A Intersection Delay = 18.7 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED IT WORKSHEET for exclusive lefts FUTURE.doc 50 • J APPROACH Cycle Length, C 60.0 sec Actual Green Time for Lane Group, G Effective Green. Time for Lane Group, g Opposing Effective Green Time, go Number of Lanes in Lane Group, N Number of Opposing Lanes, No Adjusted Left -Turn Flow Rate, Vlt Proportion of Left Turns in Opposing Flow, Plto Adjusted Opposing Flow Rate, Vo Lost Time for Lane Group, tl Left Turns per Cycle: LTC=V1tC/3600 Opposing Flow per Lane, Per Cycle: Volc=VoC/3600fluo Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo (Table 9-2 or Eqn 9-7) gf=[Gexp(- a * (LTC ** b))]-tl, gf<=g Opposing'Queue Ratio: qro=1-Rpo(go/C) gq=(4.943Volc**0.762)[(gro**1.061)-tl], gq<=g gu =g-gq if gq>=gf, =g-gf if gq<gf n=(gq-gf)/2, n>=0 Ptho=1-Plto Pl*=Plt[1+{(N-1)g/(gf+gu/Ell+4.24))) Ell (Figure 9-7) E12=(1-Ptho**n)/Plto, E12>=1.0 fmin=2(1+Plt)/g or fmin=2(1+P1)/g gdiff-max(gq-gf,0) fm=[gf/g]+[gu/g][1/{1+P1(Ell-1)}], (min=fmin;max=1.00) flt=fm=[gf/g]+gdiff[l/{l+plt(E12-1)}] EB WB NB SB Submitted into the public MOM In connection with Item on V Walter Foeman City Clerk +[gu/g][1/(1+Plt(Ell-1)],(min=fmin;max=1.0) or flt=[fm+0.91(N-1)]/N** fit For special case of single -lane approach opposed by multilane approach, see text. * If P1>=1 for shared left -turn lanes with N>1, then assume de -facto left -turn lane and redo calculations. #* For permitted left -turns with multiple exclusive left -turn lanes, flt=fm. For special case of multilane approach opposed by single -lane approach or when gf>gq, see text. SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED LT WORKSHEET for shared lefts APPROACH EB WB NB SB Cycle Length, C 60.0 sec Actual Green Time for Lane Group, G 9.0 9.0 41.0 41.0 Effective Green Time for Lane Group, g 9.00 9.00 41.00 41.00 Opposing Effective Green Time, go 9.0 9.0 41.0 41.0 Number of Lanes in Lane Group, N 2 -2 2 2 Number of Opposing Lanes, No 2 2 2 2 Adjusted Left -Turn Flow Rate, Vlt 22 74 110 35 Proportion of Left Turns in Lane Group, Pit 0.06 0.26 0.39 0.09 Proportion of Left Turns in Opposing Flow, Plto 0.26 0.06 0.09 0.39 Adjusted Opposing Flow Rate, Vo 280 374 386 280 Lost Time for Lane Group, tl 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 Left Turns per Cycle: LTC=V1tC/3600 0.37 1:23 1.83 0.58 Opposing Flow per Lane, Per Cycle: Volc=VoC/3600fluo 2.46 3.28 3.39 2.46 Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo (Table 9-2 or Eqn 9-7) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 gf=[Gexp(- a * (LTC ** b))]-tl, gf<=g 1.9 0.0 6..5 18.5 Opposing Queue Ratio: qro=l-Rpo(go/C) 0.85 0.85 0.32 0.32 gq=(4.943Vo16**0.762)[(gro**1.061)-tl], gq<-g 0.55 2.26 0.00 0.00 gu =g-gq if gq>=gf, =g-gf if gq<gf 7.14 6.74 34.50 22.48 n=(gq-gf)/2, n>=0 0.00 1.13 0.00 0.00 Ptho=l-Plto 0.74 0.94 0.91 0.61 P1*=Plt[i+{(N-1)g/(gf+gu/Ei1+4.24))) 0.11 0.58 0.98 0.20 Ell (Figure 9-7) 1.87 2.07 2.09 1.87 E12=(1-Ptho**n)/Plto, E12>=1.0 1.00 1.13 1.00 1.00 fmin=2(1+Plt)/g or fmin=2(1+P1)/g 0.25 0.35 0.10 0.06 gdiff-max(gq-gf,0) 0.00 2.26 0.00 0.00 fm-[gf/g]+[gu/g][1/{1+P1(Ell-1)}], (min=fmin;max=1.00) 0.93 0.46 0.56 0.92 FUTURE.doc �- ®36 51 • flt-fm-[gf/g]+gdiff[l/{1+Plt(E12-1)1] +[gu/g][1/(1+Plt(Ell-I)I,(min -fmin:max=1 flt Primary 0) or flt=[fm+0.91(N-1)]/N$* 0.920 0.686 0.737 0.915 For. special case of single -lane approach opposed by multilane approach, see text. * If P1>=1 for shared left -turn lanes with N>1, then assume de -facto left -turn lane and redo calculations. *� For permitted left -turns with multiple exclusive left -turn lanes, flt=fm. For special case of multilane approach opposed by single -lane approach or when gf>gq, see text. SUPPLEMENTAL UNIFORM DELAY WORKSHEET EBLT WBLT NBLT SBLT Adj. LT Vol from Vol Adjustment Worksheet, v v/c ratio from Capacity Worksheet, X Primary phase effective green, g Secondary phase effective green, gq (From Supplemental Permitted IT Worksheet), gu Cycle length, C 60.0 Red =(C-g-gq-gu), r Arrivals: v/(3600(max(X,1.0))), qa Primary ph. departures: s/3600, sp Secondary ph. departures: s(gq+gu)/(gu*3600), ss XPerm XProt XCase Queue at begining of green arrow, Qa Queue at beginning of unsaturated green, Qu Residual queue, Qr Uniform Delay, dl DELAY/LOS WORKSHEET WITH INITIAL QUEUE Initial Dur. Uniform Delay Initial Final Initial Lane Appr/ Unmet Unmet Queue Unmet Queue Group Lane Demand Demand Unadj. Adj. Param. Demand Delay Delay Group Q veh t hrs. ds dl sec u Q veh d3 sec d sec Eastbound Westbound $pj�mitted into the public Northbound reoord In Connection with It9m on Walter Foeman City Clerk Southbound Intersection Delay 18.7 sec/veh Intersection LOS B FUTURE. doc 52 -�V • • HCS: Signals Release 3.1 Submitted into the public record in connection with Jackson M. Ahlstedt [Ii7 On LL C-� Jackson M. Ahlstedt, P.E. Walter Foeman Jackson M. Ahlstedt, P.E. City Clerk 46 N.W. 94th Street Miami Shores, Florida 33150 Phone: (305) 754-8695 Fax: (305) 754-8695 E-Mail: OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Intersection: City/State: Analyst: Project No: Time Period Analyzed: Date: East/West Street Name: North/South Street Name: SE 15TH RD AND BRICKELL MIAMI/FLA J. AHLSTEDT PARK PLACE FUTURE Wi0 PROJECT PM PEAK 6i5i00 SE = ROAD BRICKELL AVENUE VOLUME DATA 1 Eastbound 1 Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I L T R 1 L T R I L T R I L T R l I I 1 Volume 153 63 127 1154 77 30 164 735 187 136 1873 87 PHF 10.78 0.75 0.85 10.83 0.68 0.48 10.87 0.92 0.71 10.75 0.96 0.68 PK 15 Vol 117 21 37 146 28 16 118 200 66 112 488 32 Hi La Vol I I I I % Grade 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 Ideal Sat 1 1900 11900 1900 11900 1900 11900 1900 ParkExist I I I I NumPark I I I I % Heavy Veh10 0 0 10 0 0 10 0 0 10 0 0 No. Lanes 1 0 2 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 LGConfig 1 LTR I DefL TR I L TR I L TR Lane Width 1 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 Adj Flow 1 301 1186 176 174 1062 148 2079 %InSharedLnl I I I Prop Turns 10.23 0.50 10.00 0.36 1 0.25 1 0.06 NumPeds 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 NumBus 1 0 10 0 10 0 10 0 Duration 1.00 Area Type: All other areas OPERATING PARAMETERS 1 Eastbound I Westbound i Northbound 1 Southbound I i L T R 1 L T R 1 L T R 1 L T R I I Init Unmet 1 0.0 I 10.0 0.0 I 10.0 0.0 i 10.0 I 0.0 1 Arriv. Type 3 13 3 13 3 13 3 1 Unit Ext. 1 3.0 13.0 3.0 13.0 3.0 13.0 3.0 1 I Factor 1 1.000 1 1.000 1 1.000 1 1.000 1 Lost Time 1 2.0 12.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 1 Ext of g 1 2.0 12.0 . 2.0 12.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 1 Ped Min g 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 PHASE DATA Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 EB Left A 1 NB Left A Thru A 1 Thru A Right A 1 Right A Peds I Ped FUTURE.doc 6 7 8 53 >- SST) • WB Left A I SB Left A Thru A I Thru A Right A I Right A Peds I Ped NB Right EB Right SB Right I WB Right i Green 23.0 Yellow 4.0 All Red 1.0 Cycle Length: 115.0 Appr./ Mvt Movement Volume PHF 82.0 4.0 1.0• Submitted into the public Fig000,in connection with itef�� on !L-16 ' Walter Foeman City Clerk secs VOLUME ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET Adjusted Prop. Prop. Flow No. Lane Flow Rate Left Right Rate Lanes Group RTOR In Lane Grp Turns Turns Eastbound Left 53 0.78 68 0 Thru 63 0.75 84 2 LTR 301 0.23 0.50 Right 127 0.85 149 0 0 Westbound Left 154 0.83 186 0 DefL 186 Thru 77 0.68 113 2 TR 176 0.00 0.36 Right 30 0.48 63 0 0 Northbound Left 64 0.87 74 1 L 74 Thru 735 0.92 799 2 TR 1062 0.25 Right 187 0.71 263 0 0 Southbound Left 36 0.75 48 1 L 48 Thru 1873 0.96 1951 2 TR 2079 0.06 Right 87 0.68 128 0 0 Value entered by user. SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORRSHEET Appr/ Ideal Lane Sat f f f f f f f f f Group Flow W HV G P BB A LU RT LT Eastbound Sec IT Adj/LT Sat: LTR 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 0.95 0.926 0.835 Adj Sat Flow 2791 Westbound Sec IT Adj/LT Sat: Deft. 1900 1.000 1.000 1.00 ---- TR 1900 1.090 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 1..00 0.946 1.000 1798 Northbound Sec LT Adj/LT Sat: L 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 1.00 ---- TR 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 0.95 0.963 1.000 3476 Southbound Sec LT Adj/LT Sat: L 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 1.00 ---- 0.234 444 TR 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 0.95 0.991 1_000 3577 FUTURE.doc 54 I -I CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Adj Adj Sat Flow Green --Lane Group-- Appr/ Lane Flow Rate Flow Rate Ratio Ratio Capacity v/c Aut Group (v) (s) (v/s) (g/C) (c) Ratio Eastbound Pri. Sec. Left Thru LTR 301 2791 0.11 0.200 558 0.54 Right sUbmitted into the public Westbound reCprd in connection with L Pri. ite on Sec. Walter Foemen Left DefL 186 0.000 Thru TR 176 1798 0.10 0.200 360 0.49 City Clerk Right Northbound Pri. Sec. Left L 74 0.713 Thru TR 1062 3476 0.31 0.713 2479 0.43 Right Southbound Pri. Sec. Left L 48 444 0.11 0.713 317 0.15 Thru TR 2079 3577 0.58 0.713 2551 0.81 Right Sum (v/s) critical = 0.00 Lost Time/Cycle, L = 0.00 sec Critical v/c(X) = 0.00 LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEET Appr/ Ratios Unf Prog Lane Incremental Res Lane Group Approach Lane Del Adj Grp Factor Del Del Grp v/c g/C dl Fact Cap k d2 d3 Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound LTR 0.54 0.200 41.3 1.000 558 0.14 1.1 0.0 42.3 D 42.3 D Westbound DefL 0.000 1.000 0.0 TR 0.49 0.200 40.8 1.000 360 0.11 1.1 0.0 41.8 D 41.8 D Northbound L 0.713 1.000 0.0 TR 0.43 0.713 6.8 1.000 2479 0.11 0.1 0,0 6.9 A 6.9 A Southbound L 0,15 0.713 5.3 1.000 317 0.11 0.2 0.0 5.5 A TR 0.81 0.713 11.3 1.000 2551 0.36 2.2 0.0 13.5 B 13.3 B Intersection Delay = 15.2 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED LT WORKSHEET for exclusive lefts FUTURE. doe 55 ,u - I J 36 • • APPROACH EB WB' NB SB Cycle Length, C 115.0 sec Actual Green Time for Lane Group, G 0.0 82.0 82.0 Effective Green Time for Lane Group, g Opposing Effective Green Time, 23.00 23.0 82.00 82.0 82.00 82.0 go Number of Lanes in Lane Group, N 1 1 1 Number of Opposing Lanes, No 2 2 2 Adjusted Left -Turn Flow Rate, Vlt 186 74 48 Proportion of Left Turns in Opposing Flow, Plto 0.23 0.00 0.00 Adjusted Opposing Flow Rate, Vo 301 2079 1062 Lost Time for Lane Group, tl 0.00 4.00 4.00 Left Turns per Cycle: LTC=V1tC/3600 5.94 2.36 1.53 Opposing Flow per Lane, Per Cycle: Volc=VoC/3600fluo 5.06 34.95 17.86 Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo (Table 9-2 or Eqn 9-7) 1.00 1.00 1.00 gf=[Gexp(- a * (LTC ** b))]-tl, gf<=g 0.0 0.0 0.0 Opposing Queue Ratio: qro=1-Rpo(go/C) 0.80 0.29 0.29 gq-(4.943Volc**0.762)[(gro**1.061)-tl], gq<-g 4.88 47.16 10.86 gu =g-gq if gq>=gf, =g-gf if gq<gf 18.12 34.84 71.14 n=(gq-g£)/2, n>=0 2.44 23.58 5.43 Ptho=1-Plto 0.77 1.00 1.00 P1*=Plt[l+{(N-1)g/(gf+gu/Ell+4.24))) 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ell (Figure 9-7) 1.76 10.46 3.71 E12=(1-Ptho**n)/Plto, E12>=1.0 2.06 1.00 1.00 fmin=2(1+Plt)/g or fmin-2(1+P1)/g 0.17 0.05 0.05 gdiff=max(gq-gf,0) 4.88 0.00 0.00 fm=[gf/g]+[gu/g][1/{1+P1(Ell-1)}], (min=fmin;max=1.00) 0.45 0.05 0.23 flt=fm=[gf/g]+gdiff[1/{1+Plt(E12-1)}] +[gu/g][l/(l+Plt(Ell-1)],(min=fmin;max=1.0) or flt=[fm+0.91(N-1)]/N** fit 0.234 For special case of single -lane approach opposed by multilane approach, see text. * If P1>=1 for shared left -turn lanes with N>l, then assume de -facto left -turn lane and redo calculations. ** For permitted left -turns with multiple exclusive left -turn lanes, flt=fm. For special case of multilane approach opposed by single -lane approach or when gf>gq, see text. SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED LT WORKSHEET for shared lefts APPROACH EB WB NB SB Cycle Length, C 115.0 sec Actual Green Time for Lane Group, G 23.0 Effective Green Time for Lane Group, g 23.00 Opposing Effective Green Time, go 23.0 Number of Lanes in Lane Group, N 2 Submitted into the public Number of Opposing Lanes_ No 2 Adjusted Left -Turn Flow Rate, Vlt 68 record in connection with Proportion of Left Turns in Lane Group, Pit 0.23 14etion Proportion of Left Turns in Opposing Flow, Plto 0.00 ./ Adjusted Opposing Flow Rate, Vo 176 Waiter Foeman Lost Time for Lane Group. tl 4.00 City CierK Left Turns per Cycle: LTC=VitC/3600 2.17 .Opposing Flow per Lane, Per Cycle: Volc=VoC/3600fluo 2.81 Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo (Table 9-2 or Eqn 9-7) 1.00 gf=[Gexp(- a * (LTC ** b))]-tl, gf<=g 0.9 Opposing Queue Ratio: qro=l-Rpo(go/C) 01.80 gq=(4.943Volc**0.762)[(gro**1.061)-tl], gq<-g 0.73 gu =g-gq if gq>=gf, =g-gf if gq<gf 22.06 n=(gq-gf)/2, n>=0 0.00 Ptho=1-Plto 1.00 Pl*=Plt[l+{(N-1)g/(gf+gu/Ei1+4.24))) 0.51 Ell (Figure 9-7) 1.66 E12=(1-Ptho**n)/Plto. E12>=1.0 1.00 fmin=2(1+Plt)/g or fmin=2(1+P1)/g 0.13 gdiff=max(gq-gf,0) 0.00 fm=[gf/g]+[gu/g][1/{1+P1(Ell-1)}], (min-fmin;max=1.00) 0.76 FUTURE.doc 56 0®-1q36 flt=£m=[g£/g]+gdiff[1/{1+Plt(E12-1)}] +[gu/g][l/(l+Plt(Ell-1)],(min=fmin;max=1.0) or flt=[fm+0.91(N-1)]/N** flt Primary 0.835 For special case of single -lane approach opposed by multilane approach, see text. * If P1>=1 for shared left -turn lanes with N>l, then assume de -facto left -turn lane and redo calculations. ** For permitted left -turns with multiple exclusive left -turn lanes, flt=fm. For special case of multilane approach opposed by single -lane approach or when gf>gq, see text. SUPPLEMENTAL UNIFORM DELAY WORKSHEET EBLT WBLT NBLT SBLT Adj. IT Vol from Vol Adjustment Worksheet, v We ratio from Capacity Worksheet, X Primary phase effective green, g Secondary phase effective green, gq (From Supplemental Permitted LT Worksheet). gu Cycle length, C 115.0 Red=(C-g-gq-gu), r Arrivals: v/(3600(max(X,1.0))), qa Primary ph. departures: s/3600, sp Secondary ph. departures: s(gq+gu)/(gu*3600), ss XPerm XProt XCase Queue at begining of green arrow, Qa Queue at beginning of unsaturated green, Qu Residual queue, Qr Uniform Delay, dl DELAY/LOS WORKSHEET WITH INITIAL QUEUE Initial Dur. Uniform Delay Initial Final Initial Lane Appr/ Unmet Unmet Queue Unmet Queue Group 40 Lane Demand Demand Unadj. Adj. Param. Demand Delay Delay Group Q veh t hrs. ds dl sec u Q veh d3 sec d sec U Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Submitted into the public recor in connection with item - / on t L— 6—Qv Walter Foeman City Clerk Intersection Delay 15.2 sec/veh Intersection LOS B FUTURE.doc 57 0 • • • Submitted into the public recorA in connection with item on Walter Foeman City DO< APPENDIX D Roadway Link Level of Service for Future Traffic Volumes Without Project 00-036 • • • PARK PLACE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FUTURE AADT W/O PROJECT _ 2005 CLASS LTNESN TURN FACTORS A B C D E VOLUME TOD DIRECTION LOS _ LANES - -SE7th Street Brickell Avenue MiamiAvenue 2 NO __ ___0.6 - __ 13 740 19 550 20 580 12,693 24 HR WBSE 8th Street Miami Avenue Brickell Avenue 2 NO 0.6 13 740 19 950 20580 _ 15 750 24 HR EB D Brickell Avenue SE 7th Street Miami River 2 _ YES_ 1 22 900 32500 300 40,045 24 HR 2-WAY F Brickell Avenue SE 13th Street SE 8th Street 2 __ YES _ 1 _ ___ __22 900 32 500 _34 94 300 41,036 24 HR 2-WAY FBrickell Avenue SE 15th Road SE 13th Street 2 _ YES 1 22900 32 500 34,300 33 102 24 HR 2-WAY 13th Street Miami Avenue Brickell Avenue NS NO 1 8 600 14 600 16000 28 278 24HR _ -WAY _ESE F SE/SW 15th Road Miami Avenue Brickell Avenue OTHER NO 0.8 3840 8720 9 520 _ —6384_ 24 HR 2-WAY D SE/SW 15th Road SW 2nd Avenue Miami Avenue OTHER _ NO _ 0.8 3840 8720 9520 _8 071 24HR 2-WAY D Miami Avenue SW 15th Road SW 13th Street NS YES i 8 60D 14,600 16 000 _ _6 404 24 HR __2-WAY C Miami Avenue SW 26th Road SW 15th Road NS 4 D NO 1 11 600 23 800 25 400 8 426 24 HR _ 2-WAY C - ----- ------ - - -- UTURE W/OPROJECT 2005PEAK ---- DIRECTION_ CLASS ±�LANESCONF TURN FACTORSA BC D E VOLUME TOD DIRECTION LOSCLASLANESSE 7th Street Brickell Avenue Miami Avenue 2 NO _ 1.2 14522052 2172SE 8th Street Miami Avenue Brickell Avenue 2 NO 1.2 1,452 2.052 2.172 Brickell Avenue SE 7th Street Miami River 2 __4_ D YES 1 1 210 1,710 1 810 Brickell Avenue _ SE 13th Street SE 8th Street 2 4 D YES _ 1 1 210 1.710 Brickell Avenue _ SE 15th Road SE 13th Street 2 _ 4 D YES 1 _1 210 _1,710 1 810 SE 13th Street Miami Avenue Brickell Avenue NS 2 UD NO 1 440 760 830 SE/SW 15th Road Miami Avenue Brickell Avenue OTHER _ 2 D NO 0.8 200 448 496 378 PM EB D SE/SW 15th Road _ ^ SW 2nd Avenue Miami Avenue OTHER 2 D _NO 0.8 _ 200 448 574 PM EB F_ Miami Avenue _ _ SW 15th Road SW 13th Street NS 2 _ UD YES 1 44_0 760 _496 890 501 PM _ SB _ D Miami Avenue SW 26th Road SW 15th Road NS 4 D NO 1 1.030 _ 1.640 _ 1,750 _ 603 PM _ SB _ C GROWTH FACTOR 0.02 per year -- Submitted Into the public recur in connection with item on .(./ !falter Foeman �...... _ City Clerk 06/05/2000 E • • Submitted into the public in connection WO record �,� on I _� item Walter F'ae CAV Celk APPENDIX E Intersection Level of Service for Future Traffic Volumes With Project 06-1036 • Jackson M. Ahlstedt Jackson M. Ahlstedt, P.E. Jackson M. Ahlstedt, P.E. 46 N.W. 94th Street Miami Shores, Florida 33150 Phone: (305) 754-8695 E-Mail: Intersection: City/State: Analyst:, Project No: Time Period Analyzed: Date: East/West Street Name: North/South Street Name: HCS: Signals Release 3.1 Fax: (305) 754-8695 OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS SE 7TH ST/BRICKELL AVE MIAMI/FLORIDA J. AHLSTEDT PARK PLACE FUTURE W/PROJECT PM PEAK 6/5/00 SE 7TH STREET BRICKELL AVENUE VOLUME DATA Submitted into the public record in connection with itervi �� on LLJ-.--�/r � Walter Foeman City Clerk ( Eastbound 1 Westbound ! Northbound I Southbound I I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R 1 Volume 1 1129 492 130 1508 2805 40 143 1800 504 1" PHF 1 10.60 0.82 0.76 10.87 0.97 0.88 10.71 0.98 0.90 1 PK 15 Vol 1 154 150 43 1146 723 11 115 459 140 1 Hi Ln Vol I I - 1 I I % Grade l l 0 1 ,_ 0 1 0 1 Ideal Sat 1 11900 1900 1900 11900 1900 11900 1900 1900 1 ParkExist I I I I I NumPark % Heavy Veh{ 10 0 0 12 2 2 {0 2 2 1 No. Lanes 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 0 1 1 2 1 1 LGConfig I I L IT R I L TR l L T R I Lane Width 1 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 1 RTOR Vol I I I Adj Flow 1 1215 600 1584 2892 161 1837 1 %InSharedLnl 10 1 I I Prop Turns l 10.00 NumPeds 1 0 1 50 1 50 1 50 1 NumBus 1 10 0 0 10 0 10 0 0 1 Duration 1.00 Area Type: CBD or Similar 1 Eastbound { L T R Init Unmet I Arriv. Type{ Unit Ext. l I Factor I Lost Time 1 Ext of g l Ped Ming l OPERATING PARAMETERS l Westbound { L T R .I I Northbound 1 L T R I 10.0 0.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 13 3 3 13 3 13.0 3.0 3.0 13.0 3.0 1 1.000 1 1.000 12.0 2.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 PHASE DATA Southbound L T R 0.0 0.0 0.0 3 3 3 3.0 3.0 3.0 1.000 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left I NB Left A ® Thru 1 Thru P Right 1 Right P Peds 1 Ped PROJECT.doc I Q®-1 36 • WB Left A Thru A Right A Peds NB Right SB Right Green 20.0 Yellow 4.0 All Red . 1.0 Cycle Length: 115.0 SB Left A P Thru P Right P Ped I EB Right I WB Right I I 33.0 49.0 3.0 4.0 0.0 1.0 secs VOLUME ADJUSIM= WORKSHEET Adjusted Prop. Prop. Appr.i Mvt Flow No. Lane Flow Rate Left Right Movement Volume PHF Rate Lanes Group RTOR In Lane Grp Turns Turns Eastbound Left 0 Thru 0 Right 0 Westbound Left 129 0.60 215 1 L 215 Thru 492 0.82 600 1 LT 600 0.00 Right 130 0.76 1 R Northbound Left 508 0.87 584 2 L 584 Thru 2805 0.97 2892 2 TR 2892 Right • 40 0.88 0 Submitted into the public Southbound recp0jn Connection with Left 43 0.71 61 1 L 61 item on Thru 1800 0.98 1837 2 T 1837 Right 504 0.90 1 R Walter FOeman City Clerk * Value entered by user. SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET Appri Ideal Adj Lane Sat f f f f f f f f- f Sat Group Flow W HV G P BB A LU RT IT Flow Eastbound Sec LT Adj/LT Sat: Westbound Sec LT Adj/LT Sat: L 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.90 1.00 ---- 0.950 1624 LT 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.90 1.00 1.000 R 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.90 1.00 ---- Northbound Sec LT Adj/LT Sat: L 1900 1.000 0.980 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.90 0.97 ---- 0.950 3090 TR 1900 1.000 0.980 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.90 0.95 1.000 Southbound Sec LT Adj/LTSat: 0.075 129 L 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.90 1.00 - 0.950 1624 T 1900 1.000 0.980 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.90 0.95 1.000 R 1900 1.000 0.980 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.90 1.00 ---- PROJECT.doc E 0O6 00-1 Appr/ Lane Mvmt Group CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Adj Adj.Sat Flow Green Flow Rate Flow Rate Ratio Ratio (v) (s) (v/s) (g/C) --Lane Group-- Capacity v/c (c) Ratio Eastbound Pri. Sec. Left Thru Right Westbound Pri. Sec. Left L 215 1624 0.13 0.174 282 0.76 Thru LT 600 0.174 Right R 0.174 Submitted into the public Northbound record in connection with Pri. item Sec. on Left L 584 3090 0.19 0.287 887 0.66 Walter Foernan Thru TR 2892 0.426 City Clerk Right Southbound Pri. 61 1624 0.04 0.278 452 0.13 Sec. 0 129 0.00 0.461 63 0.00 Left L 61 0.739 515 0.12 Thru T 1837 0.426 Right R 0.426 Sum (v/s) critical = 0.00 Lost Time/Cycle, L = 0.00 sec Critical v/c(X) = 0.00 LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEET Appr/ Ratios Unf Prog Lane Incremental Res Lane Group Approach Lane Del Adj Grp Factor Del Del Grp v/c g/C dl Fact Cap k d2 d3 Delay LOS Delay LOS • Eastbound Westbound L 0.76 0.174 45.2 1.000 282 0.31 12.5 0.0 57.8 E LT 0.174 1.000 0.0 57.8 E R 0.174 1.000 0.0 Northbound L 0.66 0.287 36.0 1.000 887 0.23 1.8 .0.0 37.9 D TR 0.426 1.000 0.50 0.0 37.9 D Southbound L 0.12 0.739 31.1 1.000 515 0.11 0.1 0.0 31.2 C T 0.426 1.000 0.50 0.0 31.2 C R 0.426 1.000 0.50 0.0 Intersection Delay = 42.4 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = D SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED LT WORKSHEET. for exclusive lefts PROJECT.doc 3 00--1036 • • APPROACH EB Cycle Length, C 115.0 sec Actual Green Time for Lane Group, G Effective Green Time for Lane Group, g Opposing Effective Green Time, go Number of Lanes in Lane Group, N Number of Opposing Lanes, No Adjusted Left -Turn Flow Rate, Vlt Proportion of Left Turns in Opposing Flow, Plto Adjusted Opposing Flow Rate, Vo Lost Time for Lane Group, tl Left Turns per Cycle: LTC=V1tC/3600 Opposing Flow per Lane, Per Cycle: Volc--VoC/3600fluo Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo (Table 9-2 or Eqn 9 -7) gf=[Gexp(- a * (LTC ** b))]-tl, gf<=g Opposing Queue Ratio: qro=1-Rpo(go/C) gq=(4.943Volc**0.762)[(gro**1.061)-tl], gq<-g gu =g-gq if gq>=gf, =g-gf if gq<gf n=(gq-gf)/2, n>=0 Ptho=1-Plto Pl*=Plt[l+{(N-1)g/(gf+gu/Ell+4.24))) Ell (Figure 9-7) E12=(1-Ptho**n)/Plto, E12>=1.0 fmin=2(1+Plt)/g or fmin=2(1+P1)/g gdiff=nax(gq-gf,0) fm=[gf/g]+[gu/g][l/{l+P1(Ell-1)1], (min=fmin;max=1.00) flt=fm=[gf/g]+gdiff[l/{1+Plt(E12-1)1] WB NB SB 85.0 53.00 49.0 1 2 61 0.00 2892 4.00 1.95 48.62 1.00 0.0 0.57 53.00 0.00 26.50 1.00 1.00 24.66 1.00 0.08 0.00 0.08 +[gu/g][l/(l+Plt(Ell-1)],(min=fmin;max=1.0) or flt=[fm+0.91(N-1)]/N** fit 0.075 For special case of single -lane approach opposed by multilane approach, see text. * If P1>=1 for shared left -turn lanes with N>l, then assume de -facto left -turn lane and redo calculations. ** For permitted left -turns with multiple exclusive left -turn lanes, flt=fm. For special case of multilane approach opposed by single -lane approach or when gf>gq, see text. - SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED LT WORKSHEET for shared lefts APPROACH Cycle Length, C 115.0 sec Actual Green Time for Lane Group, G Effective Green Time for Lane Group, g Opposing Effective Green Time, go Number of Lanes in Lane Group, N Number of Opposing Lanes, No Adjusted Left -Turn Flow Rate, Vlt Proportion of Left Turns in Lane Group, Pit Proportion of Left Turns in Opposing Flow, Plto Adjusted Opposing Flow Rate, Vo Lost Time for Lane Group, tl Left Turns per Cycle: LTC=V1tC/3600 Opposing Flow per Lane, Per Cycle: Volc=VoC/3600fluo Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo (Table 9-2 or Eqn 9-7) gf=[Gexp(- a * (LTC ** b))]-tl, gf<=g Opposing Queue Ratio: qro=1-Rpo(go/C) gq=(4.943Vo1c**0.762)[(gro**1.061)-tl], gq<=g Su =g-gq if gq>=gf, =g-gf if gq<gf n=(gq-gf)/2, n>=0 Ptho=1-Plto Pl*=Plt[1+{(N-1)9/(gf+gu/E11+4.24))) Ell (Figure 9-7) E12=(1-Ptho**n)/Plto, E12>=1.0 fmin=2(1+Plt)/g or fmin=2(1+P1)/g gdiff=max(gq-gf,0) fm=[gf/g]+[gu/g][1/11+P1(Ell-1)1], (min=fmin;max=1.00) PROJECT.doc EB WB NB SB Submitted into the public reco en connection with item Z—, on Walter Foeman City Clerk 0-13i� flt=fm=[gf/g]+gdiff[l/{l+Plt(E12-1)}] +[gu/g][l/(l+Plt(Ell-1)],(min=fmin;max=1.0) or flt=[fm+0.91(N-1)]/N*f flt Primary • For special case of single -lane approach opposed by multilane approach, see text. If P1>=1 for shared left -turn lanes with N>l, then assume de -facto left -turn lane and redo calculations. For permitted left -turns with multiple exclusive left -turn lanes, flt=£m. For special case of multilane approach opposed by single -lane approach or when gf>gq, see text. • SUPPLEMENTAL UNIFORM DELAY WORKSHEET EBLT WBLT NBLT SBLT Adj. LT Vol from Vol Adjustment Worksheet, v 61 v/c ratio from Capacity Worksheet, X 0.00 Primary phase effective green, g 53.00 Secondary phase effective green, gq 53.00 (From Supplemental Permitted LT Worksheet), Su 0.00 Cycle length, C 115.0 Red=(C-g-gq-gu), r 30.0 Arrivals: v/(3600(max(X,1.0))), qa 0.02 Primary ph. departures: s/3600, sp 0.451 Secondary ph. departures: s(gq+gu)/(gu*3600), ss 53.00 XPerm 9.99 XProt 0.07 XCase 3 Queue at begining of green arrow, Qa 1.41 Queue at beginning of unsaturated green, Qu 0.90 Residual queue, Qr 0.90 Uniform Delay, dl 31.1 DELAY/LOS WORKSHEET WITH INITIAL QUEUE Initial Dur. Uniform Delay Initial Final Initial Lane Appr/ Unmet Unmet Queue Unmet Queue Group Lane Demand Demand Unadj. Adj. Param. Demand Delay Delay Group Q veh t hrs. ds dl sec u Q veh d3 sec d sec Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Intersection Delay 42.4 sec/veh PROJECT.doc Submitted into the public recor in connection with item- Walter Foeman City Clerk Intersection LOS D 5 1i • • PROJECT.doc into the publIC Submittedption With recur ion item alter FoerOn City Cleft 0 -1036 • • Jackson M. Ahlstedt Jackson M. Ahlstedt, P.E. Jackson M. Ahlstedt, P.E. 46 N.W. 94th Street Miami Shores, Florida 33150 Phone: (305) 754-8695 E-Mail: Intersection: City/State: Analyst: Project No: Time Period Analyzed: Date: East/West Street Name: North/South Street Name ( Eastbound ( L T R I Volume PHF 1 PK 15 Vol 1 Hi Ln Vol 1 i Grade 1 Ideal Sat 1 ParkExist i NumPark 1 % Heavy Vehl No. Lanes 1 0 0 0 LGConfig 1 Lane Width 1 RTOR Vol 1 Adj Flow %InSharedLnl Prop Turns 1 NumPeds 1 NumBus 1 Duration 1.00 HCS: Signals Release 3.1 Fax: (305) 754-8695 OPERATIONAL ANALYSI SE 7TH ST/MIAMI AVE MIAMI/FLORIDA J. AHLSTEDT PARK PLACE FUTURE W/PROJECT PM PEAK 6/5/00 SE 7TH STREET MIAMI AVENUE VOLUME DATA Westbound ( Northbound L T R 1 L T R 1341 69 1814 476 0.80 0.75 10.74 0.83 419 23 1275 144 0 I 1 0 1900 1900 11900 1900 Ix 120 0 0 10 0 0 2 1 1 1 2 T R I L LT 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 0 1 1676 92 1814 862 126 10.33 0 1 0 0 10 0 Area Type: CBD or Similar { Eastbound { L T R I Init Unmet 1 Arriv. Typel Unit Ext. 1 I Factor Lost Time 1 Est of g l Ped Min g 1 OPERATING PARAMETERS Westbound L T R 0.0 0.0 3 3 3.0 3.0 1.000 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Southbound L T R x 1 20 i I 0 1 1 I 0 0 0 I I I I 0 Northbound { Southbound L T R { L T R 1 0.0 0.0 1 3 3 1 3.0 3.0 i 1.000 2.0 2.0 1 2.0 2.0 1 0.0 1 PHASE DATA Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 Submitted8 into the public. EB Left 1 NB Left P recoq, in Connection With Thru Thru P item - :::-JL1 on 1L1_��.. Right 1 Right Walter Foeman Peds { Ped City Cled � PROJECT.doc 00_1r � • WB Left Thru P Right P Peds NB Right SB Right Green 36.0 Yellow 4.0 All Red 1.0 Cycle Length: 80.0 Appr./ Mvt Movement Volume PHF ( SB Left I Thru ( Right Ped I EB Right I ( WB Right I I 35.0 4.0 secs VOLUME ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET Adjusted Prop. Prop. Flow No. Lane Flow Rate Left Right Rate Lanes Group RTOR In Lane Grp Turns Turns Eastbound Left 0 Thru 0 Right 0 Westbound Left 0 Thru 1341 0.80 1676 2 T 1676 Right 69 0.75 92 1 R 0 92 Northbound Left 814 0.74 1100 1 L 814 Thru 478 0.83 576 2 LT 862 0.33 Right 0 Submitted into the public southbound Left 0 rec d in connection with Thru 0 item. = L or9/ Right 0 Walter Foeman Value entered by user. City Cleric SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET Appr/ Ideal Adj Lane Sat f f f f f f f f- f Sat Group Flow W HV G p BB A LU RT LT Flow Eastbound Sec LT Adj/LT Sat: Westbound Sec LT Adj/LT Sat: T 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.90 0.95 1.000 1.000 3249 R 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.90 1.00 0.850 ---- 1454 Northbound Sec LT Adj/LT Sat: L .1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.800 1.000 0.90 1.00 ---- 0.950 1300 IT 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.900 1.000 0.90 0.95 1.000 0.984 2876 Southbound Sec LT Adj/LT Sat: PROJECT.doc g 00-1UH • 0 • ,7 CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Adj Adj Sat Flow Green --Lane Group-- Appr/ Lane Flow Rate Flow Rate Ratio Ratio Capacity v/c Mvmt Group (v) (s) (v/s) (g/C) (c) Ratio Eastbound Pri. Sec. Left Thru Right Westbound Pri. Sec. Left Thru T 1676 3249 # 0.52 0.450 1462 1.15 Right R 92 1454 0.06 0.450 654 0.14 Northbound Pri. Sec. Left L 814 1300 # 0.63 0.438 569 1.43 Thru LT 862 2876 0.30 0.438 1258 0.69 Right Southbound Pri. Sec. Left Thru Right Sum (v/s) critical = 1.14 Lost Time/Cycle, L = 8.00 sec Critical v/c(X) = 1.27 LEVEL OF SERVICE WORRSHEET Appr/ Ratios Unf Prog Lane Incremental Res Lane Group Approach Lane Del Adj Grp Factor Del Del Grp v/c g/C dl Fact Cap k d2 d3 Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound Westbound T 1.15 0.450 22.0 1.000 1462 0.50 272.8 0.0 294.8 F 294.8 F R 0.14 0.450 12.9 1.000 654 0.50 0.5 0.0 13.4 B Northbound L 1.43 0.438 22.5 1.000 569 0.50 785.4 0:0 807.9 F LT 0.69 0.438 18.1 1.000 1258 0.50 3.1 0.0 21.2 C 403.3 F Submitted into the public Southbound reco In connec ion with item on Walter Foeman City Clerk Intersection Delay = 340.1 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = F SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED IT WORKSHEET for exclusive lefts PROJECT.doc 9 APPROACH EB Cycle Length, C 80.0 sec . Actual Green Time for Lane Group, G Effective Green Time for Lane Group, g Opposing Effective Green Time, go Number of Lanes in Lane Group, N Number of Opposing Lanes, No Adjusted Left -Turn Flow Rate, Vlt Proportion of Left Turns in Opposing Flow, Plto Adjusted Opposing Flow Rate, Vo Lost Time for Lane Group, tl Left Turns per Cycle: LTC=VltC/3600 Opposing Flow per Lane, Per Cycle: Volc=VoC/3600fluo Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo (Table 9-2 or Eqn 9-7) gf=[Gexp(- a * (LTC ** b))]-tl, gf<-g Opposing Queue Ratio: qro=1-Rpo(go/C) gq-(4.943Volc**0.762)[(gro**1.061)-tl], gq<=g gu =g-gq if gq>=gf, =g-gf if gq<gf n=(gq-gf)/2, n>=0 Ptho=1-Plto P1*=Plt[l+{(N-1)g/(gf+gu/E11+4.24))) Ell (Figure 9-7) E12=(1-Ptho**n)/Plto, E12>=1.0 fmin=2(1+Plt)/g or fmin=2(1+P1)/g gdiff=max(gq-gf,0) fm=[gf/g]+[gu/g][1/{l+Pl(Ell-1)}], (min=fmin;max=1.00) flt=fm=[gf/g]+gdiff[l/{l+Plt(E12-1)}] WB NB SB +[gu/g][l/(l+Plt(Ell-1)],(min=fmin;max=1.0) or flt=[fm+0.91(N-1)]/N** fit For special case of single -lane approach opposed by multilane approach, see text. * If P1>=1 for shared left -turn lanes with N>l, then assume de -facto left -turn lane and redo calculations. ** For permitted left -turns with multiple exclusive left -turn lanes, flt=fm. For special case of multilane approach opposed by single -lane approach or when gf>gq, see text. SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED IT WORKSHEET for shared lefts APPROACH Cycle Length, C 60.0 sec Actual Green Time for Lane Group, G Effective Green Time for Lane Group, g Opposing Effective Green Time, go Number of Lanes in Lane Group, N Number of Opposing Lanes, No Adjusted Left -Turn Flow Rate, Vlt Proportion of Left Turns in Lane Group, Pit Proportion of Left Turns in Opposing Flow, Plto Adjusted Opposing Flow Rate, Vo Lost Time for Lane Group, tl Left Turns per Cycle: LTC=V1tC/3600 Opposing Flow per Lane, Per Cycle: Volc-VoC/3600fluo Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo (Table 9-2 or Eqn 9-7) gf=[Gexp(- a * (LTC ** b))]-tl, gf<=g Opposing Queue Ratio: qro=1-Rpo(go/C) gq=(4.943V61c**0.762)[(gro**1.061)-tl], gq<=g gu =g-gq if gq>=gf, =g-gf if gq<gf n=(gq-gf)/2, n>=0 Ptho=1-Plto P1*=Plt[l+{(N-1)g/(Sf+gu/E11+4.24))) Ell (Figure 9-7) E12=(1-Ptho**n)/Plto, E12>=1.0 fmin=2(1+Plt)/g or fmin=2(1+P1)/g gdiff=max(gq-gf,0) fm=[gf/g]+[gu/g][1/{1+P1(E11-1)}], (min=fmin;max=1.00) PROJECT.doc EB WB NB SB Submitted Into the public record in connection with item-;t on Walter Foeman City Cleric 10 0--1036 0 0 flt=fm=[gf/g]+gdiff[1/f1+Plt(E12-1)}] +[gu/g][1/(1+Plt(Ell-1)],(min=fmin;max=1.0) or flt=[fm+0.91(N-1)]/N¢- . flt Primary For special case of single -lane approach opposed by multilane approach, see text. +� If P1>=1 for shared left -turn lanes with N>1, then assume de -facto left -turn lane and redo calculations. ff For permitted left -turns with multiple exclusive left -turn lanes, flt=fm. For special case of multilane approach opposed by single -lane approach or when gf>gq, see text. SUPPLEMENTAL UNIFORM DELAY WORKSHEET EBLT WBLT NBLT SBLT Adj. LT Vol from Vol Adjustment Worksheet, v v/c ratio from Capacity Worksheet, X Primary phase effective green, g Secondary phase effective green, gq (From Supplemental Permitted IT Worksheet), gu Cycle length, C 80.0 Red=(C-g-gq-gu), r Arrivals: v/(3600(max(X,1.0))), qa Primary ph. departures: s/3600, sp Secondary ph. departures: s(gq+gu)/(gu*3600), ss XPerm XProt XCase Queue at begining of green arrow, Qa Queue at beginning of unsaturated green, Qu Residual queue, Qr Uniform Delay, di ELAY/LOS WORKSHEET WITH INITIAL QUEUE Initial Dur. Uniform Delay Initial Final Initial Lane Appr/ Unmet Unmet Queue Unmet Queue Group Lane Demand Demand Unadj. Adj. Param. Demand Delay Delay Group Q veh t hrs. ds dl sec u Q veh d3 sec d sec Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Intersection Delay 340.1 sec/veh Intersection LOS F b uea ono the public record in connection with item on Walter Foeman City Clerk PROJECT.doc 11 00-1036 . Jackson M. Ahlstedt Jackson M. Ahlstedt, P.E. Jackson M. Ahlstedt, P.E. 46 N.W. 94th Street Miami Shores, Florida 33150 Phone: (305) 754-8695 E-Mail: r� Intersection: City/State: Analyst: Project No: Time Period Analyzed: Date: East/West Street Name: North/South Street Name: HCS: Signals Release 3.1 Fax: (305) 754-8695 OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS SE 8TH ST/BRICKELL AVE MIAMI/FLORIDA J. AHLSTEDT PARK PLACE FUTURE W/PROJECT PM PEAK 6i5i00 SE 8TH STREET BRICKELL AVENUE VOLUME ( Eastbound ( Westbound 1 L T R I L T R I I Volume 1563 551 365 1457 PHF 10.83 0.80 0.64 10.90 PK 15 Vol 1170 172 143 1127 Hi Ln Vol I I Grade 1 0 1 Ideal Sat J1900 1900 J1900 ParkExist I I NumPark I I % Heavy Veh12 2 2 12 No. Lanes 1 2 2 0 1 2 LGConfig I L TR I L Lane Width 112.0 12.0 112.0 RTOR Vol Adj Flow 1678 689 1508 %InSharedLnl 1 Prop Turns I I NumPeds 1 50 1 NumBus 10 0 10 Duration 1.00 Northbound ( Southbound L T R I L T R 853 1 0.94 1 227 1 I 0 1 1900 1 I i 2 1 0 1 1 0 R 1 12.0 I I l I I 50 1 0 1 Area Type: CBD or Similar 1 Eastbound 1 L T R I Init Unmet 10.0 0.0 Arriv. Type13 3 Unit Ext. 13.0 3.0 I Factor 1 1.000 Lost Time 12.0 2.0 Ext of g 12.0 2.0 Ped Min g 1 0.0 OPERATING PARAMETERS 1 Westbound 1 L T R I 10.0 0.0 13 3 13.0 3.0 1 1.000 12.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 1 0.0 I 2656 293 1342 1640 0.93 0.84 10.86 0.88 714 87 199 466 0 1 0 1900 1900 11900 1900 2 2 12 2 2 1 1 2 3 0 T R I L T 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 2856 1 1398 I 1664 50 I 1 0 0 10 0 Northbound L T R 0.0 0.0 3 3 3.0 3.0 1.000 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 1 Southbound 1 L T R I 10.0 0.0 13 3 13.0 3.0 ( 1.000 12.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 1 0.0 PHASE DATA Submitted into the puWfre Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 reco in connection with EB Left A J NB Left ite- on Thru A 1 Thru P Walter Foemafl Right A Right P Peds Ped City Clerk 1 �.Y„ n . PROJECT.doc n 12 00-1036 • • WB Left A Thru ® Right A Peds NB Right SB Right Green 24.0 10.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 All Red 1.0 1.0 I SB Left A Thru A P Right Ped EB Right I I WB Right I I 8.0 55.0 3.0 4.0 0.0 1.0 Cycle Length: 115.0 secs VOLUME ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET Adjusted Prop. Prop. Appr./ Mvt Flow No. Lane Flow Rate Left Right Movement Volume PHF Rate Lanes Group RTOR In Lane Grp Turns Turns Eastbound Left 563 0.83 678 2 L 676 Thru 551 0.80 689 2 TR 689 Right 365 0.64 0 Westbound Left 457 0.90 508 2 L 508 Thru 0 Right 853 0.94 1 R Northbound Left 0 Thru 2656 0.93 2856 2 T 2856 Right 293 0.84 1 R Submitted Into the public Southbound feco in connection with Left 342 0.86 398 2 L 398 iterdeEm on Thru 1640 0.88 1864 3 T 1864 Right 0 Walter Foemart GIN Clerk value enLerea Ay user. SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET Appr/ Ideal Adj Lane Sat f f f f f f f f f Sat Group Flow W HV G P BB A LU RT LT Flow Eastbound Sec IT Adj/LT Sat: L 1900 1.000 0.980 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.90 0.97 ---- 0.950 3090 TR 1900 1.000 0.980 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.90 0.95 1.000 Westbound Sec IT Adj/LT Sat: L 1900 1.000 0.980 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.90 0.97 ---- 0.950 3090 R 1900 1.000 0.980 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.90 1.00 ---- Northbound Sec LT Adj/LT Sat: T 1900 1.000 0.980 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.90 0.95 1.000 R 1900 1.000 0.980 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.90 1.00 ---- Southbound Sec LT Adj/LT Sat: L 1900 1.000 0.980 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.90 0.97 ---- 0.950 3090 T 1900 1.000 0.980 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.90 0.91 1.000 1.000 4577 PROJECT.doc 13 6d-1 1q_ 6 CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Adj Adj Sat Flow Green --Lane Group-- Appri Lane Flow Rate Flow Rate Ratio Ratio Capacity v/c Mvmt Group (v) (s) (v/s) (giC) (c) Ratio Eastbound Pri. Sec. Left L 678 3090 0.22 0.209 645 1.05 Thru TR 689 0.209 Right Westbound Pri. Sec. Left L 508 3090 0.16 0.087 269 1.89 Thru Right R 0.087 Northbound Pri. Sec. Left Thru T 2856 0.478 Right R 0.478 Southbound Fri. Sec. Left L 398 3090 0.13 0.070 215 1.85 Thru T 1864 4577 0.41 0.574 2627 0.71 Right 0.00 Sum (vis) critical = Lost Time./Cycle, L = 0.00 sec Critical vic(X) = 0.00 LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEET Appri Ratios Unf Prog Lane Incremental Res Lane Group Approach Lane Del Adj Grp Factor Del Del Grp vic giC dl Fact Cap k d2 d3 Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 1.05 0.209 45.5 1.000 645 0.50 132.1 0.0 177.6 F TR 0.209 1.000 0.0 177.6 F Westbound L 1.89 0.087 52.5 1.000 269 0.50 0.0 R 0.087 1.000 0.0 Submitted into the Northbound recordpublic i �COP10eC$jon i J'% - with T 0.478 R 0.478 1.000 0.50 1.000 0.50 0.0 0.0 o n V�/F n Southbound Citl/ Clerk L 1.85 0.070 53.5 1.000 215 0.50 0.0 T 0.71 0.574 17.6 1.000 2627 0.27 0.9 0.0 18.5 B 18.5 B Intersection Delay = 60.9 (seciveh) Intersection LOS = E SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED LT WORKSHEET for exclusive lefts PROJECT.doc 14 00-10"36 11 • • Actual Green TimeLane Group, G Effective Green T or Lane Group, g Opposing Effective en Time, go Number of Lanes in Lane Group, N Number of Opposing Lanes, No Adjusted Left -Turn Flow Rate, Vlt Proportion of Left Turns in Opposing Flow, Plto Adjusted Opposing Flow Rate, Vo Lost Time for Lane Group, tl Left Turns per Cycle: LTC=V1tC/3600 Opposing Flow per Lane, Per Cycle: Volc=VoC/3600fluo Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo (Table 9-2 or Eqn 9-7) gf-[Gexp(- a * (LTC ** b))]-tl, gf<=g Opposing Queue Ratio: qro=1-Rpo(go/C) gq-(4.943Volc**0.762)[(gro**1.061)-tl], gq<=g gu =g-gq if gq>=gf, =g-gf if gq<gf n=(gq-gf)/2, n>=0 Ptho=1-Plto Pl*=Plt[1+{(N-1)g/(gf+gu/Ell+4.24))) Ell (Figure 9-7) E12=(1-Ptho**n)/Plto, E12>=1.0 fmin=2(1+Plt)/g or fmin=2(1+P1)/g gdiff-max(gq-gf,0) fm=[gf/g]+[gu/g][1/{1+P1(Ell-1)}], (min=fmin;max=1.00) flt=fm=[gf/g]+gdiff[l/{l+Plt(E12-1)}] +[gu/91[1/(1+Plt(Ell-1)],(min=fmin;max=1.0) or flt=[fm+0.91(N-1)]/N** fit For special case of single -lane approach opposed by multilane approach, see text. If P1>=1 for shared left -turn lanes with N>l, then assume de -facto left -turn lane and redo calculations. +►* For permitted left -turns with multiple exclusive left -turn lanes, flt=fm. For special case of multilane approach opposed by single -lane approach or when gf>gq, see text. SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED LT WORKSHEET for shared lefts APPROACH Cycle Length, C 115.0 sec Actual Green Time for Lane Group, G Effective Green Time for Lane Group, g Opposing Effective Green Time, go Number of Lanes in Lane Group, N Number of Opposing Lanes, No Adjusted Left -Turn Flow Rate, Vlt Proportion of Left Turns in Lane Group, Pit Proportion of Left Turns in Opposing Flow, Plto Adjusted Opposing Flow Rate, Vo Lost Time for Lane Group, tl Left Turns per Cycle: LTC=V1tC/3600 Opposing Flow per Lane, Per Cycle: Volc=VoC/3600fluo Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo (Table 9-2 or Eqn 9-7) gf=[Gexp(- a * (LTC ** b))]-tl, gf<=g Opposing Queue Ratio: qro=l-Rpo(go/C) gq=(4.943Volc**0.762)[(gro**1.061)-tl], gq<=g gu =g-gq if gq>=gf, =g-gf if gq<gf n=(gq-gf)/2, n>=0 Ptho=l-Plto Pl*=Plt[l+{(N-1)9ftgf+gu/Ell+4.24))) Ell (Figure 9-7) E12=(1-Ptho**n)/Plto, E12>=1.0 fmin=2(1+Plt)/g or fmin=2(1+P1)/g gdiff--max(gq-gf,0) fm=[gf/g]+[gu/g][1/{l+Pl(Ell-1)}], (min=fmin;max=1.00) PROJECT.doc EB WB NB SB Submitted into the public recor in connection Mun _item on l—/G--aa Walter Foeman City Clerk 15 00-1096 • flt=fm=[gf/g]+gdiff[l/{1+Plt(E12-1)}] +[gu/g][l/(1+Plt(Ell-1)],(min=fmin;max=1.0) or flt=[fm+0.91(N-1)]/N** flt Primary ® For special case of single -lane approach opposed by multilane approach, see text. If P1>=1 for shared left -turn lanes with N>1, then assume de -facto left -turn lane and redo calculations. ## For permitted left -turns with multiple exclusive left -turn lanes, flt=fm. For special case of multilane approach opposed by single -lane approach or when gf>gq, see text. SUPPLEMENTAL UNIFORM DELAY WORKSHEET EBLT WBLT NBLT SBLT Adj. IT Vol from Vol Adjustment Worksheet, v v/c ratio from Capacity Worksheet, X Primary phase effective green, g Secondary phase effective green, gq (From Supplemental Permitted IT Worksheet), gu Cycle length, C 115.0 Red=(C-g-gq-gu), r Arrivals: v/(3600(max(X,1.0))), qa Primary ph. departures: s/3600, sp Secondary ph. departures: s(gq+gu)/(gu*3600), ss XPerm XProt XCase Queue at begining of green arrow, Qa Queue at beginning of unsaturated green, Qu Residual queue, Qr Uniform Delay, dl DELAY/LOS WORKSHEET WITH INITIAL QUEUE isInitialDur. Uniform Delay Initial Final Initial Lane Appr/ Unmet Unmet Queue Unmet Queue Group Lane Demand Demand Unadj. Adj. Param. Demand Delay Delay Group Q veh t hrs. ds dl sec u Q veh d3 sec d sec • Eastbound Westbound Northbound Submitted into the public record in connectiio—n' wire Southbound 9te�-�1- On Walter Foeman 6A City Clerk Intersection Delay 60.9 sec/veh Intersection LOS E PROJECT. doe 16 00-1036 0 0 E • Jackson M. Ahlstedt Jackson M. Ahlstedt, P.E. Jackson M. Ahlstedt, P.E. 46 N.W. 94th Street Miami Shores, Florida 33150 Phone: (305) 754-8695 E-Mail: Intersection: City/State: Analyst: Project No: Time Period Analyzed: Date: East/West Street Name: North/South Street Name: I Eastbound L T R I Volume 1279 799 PHF 10.90 0.87 PR 15 Vol 178 230 Hi Ln Vol I Grade 1 0 Ideal Sat J 1900 ParkExist IX X NumPark 120 20 % Heavy Veh15 2 No. Lanes 1 0 3 0 LGConfig I LT Lane Width 1. 12.0 RTOR Vol I Adj Flow 1 1228 %InSharedLnl Prop Turns 10.25 NumPeds i NumBus 1 0 HCS: Signals Release 3.1 Fax: (305) 754-8695 OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS SE 8TH ST/MIAMI AVE MIAMI/FLORIDA J. AHLSTEDT PARK PLACE FUTURE W/PROJECT PM PEAK 6/5/00 SE 8TH STREET MIAMI AVENUE VOLUME DATA Westbound Northbound L T R I L T R I 969 79 1 0.72 0.63 1 336 24 I I 0 1 1900 IX X 120 20 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 1 TR 1 12.0 I 1 1346 I I 0 ( 0 I 0 Duration 1.00 Area Type: CBD or Similar OPERATING PARAMETERS Southbound L T R 0 0 0 Eastbound I Westbound i Northbound I Southbound 1 I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R 1 I Init Unmet l 0.0 I i 1 1 0.0 I I Arriv. Type) 3 I I 3 I I Unit Ext. 1 3.0 I 1 3.0 I 1 I Factor I 1.000 I 1 1.000 I 1 Lost Time 1 2.0 I l 2.0 I I Ext of g 1 2.0 I I 2.0 I I Ped Min g 1 0.0 1 1 0.0 IsUbMitted Ithe into Q41b0I� PHASE DATA ear ;_ - ,,Wi 111cc:ciUP�1 u� ith Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6-item on "��i (2p Walter Fpeman EB Left P I NB Left ;. Thru P Thru P 9'J i :.. C1/ Cie(, Right I Right P Peds I Ped PROJECT.doc 17 00-1036 WB Left Thru Right Peds NB Right SB Right Green 28.0 Yellow 4.0 All Red 0.0 Cycle Length: 80.0 r� • Appr./ Mvt Movement Volume PHF I SB Left is Thru j Right j Ped j EB Right I I WB Right i 44.0 4.0 0.0 secs VOLUME ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET Adjusted Prop. Prop. Flow No. Lane Flow Rate Left Right Rate Lanes Group RTOR In Lane Grp Turns Turns Eastbound Left 279 0.90 310 0 Thru 799 0.87 918 3 LT 1228 0.25 Right 0 Westbound Left 0 Thru 0 Right 0 Northbound Left 0 Thru 969 0.72 1346 3 TR 1346 Right 79 0.83 0 Southbound Left 0 Thru 0 Right 0 Value entered by user. SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET Appr/ Ideal Lane Sat f f f f f f £ f f Group Flow W HV G •P BB A LU RT LT Eastbound Sec IT Adj/LT Sat: LT 1900 1.000 0.980 1.000 0.900 1.000 0.90 0.91 1.000 0.938 Westbound Sec IT Adj/LT Sat: Northbound Sec LT Adj/LT Sat: TR 1990 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.900 1.000 0.90 0.91 1.000 Southbound Sec LT Adj/LT Sat: --- Submitted into the public record in connection- �wi itth PROJECT.doc � item r� On i� 44-- � Walter Foeman City Clerk Adj Sat Flow 4068 18 i-kU0--1Uab __ CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Adj Adj Sat Flow Green --Lane Group-- Appr/ Lane Flow Rate Flow Rate Ratio Ratio Capacity v/c Mvmt Group (v) (s) (v/s) (g/C) (c) Ratio Eastbound Pri. Sec. Left Thru LT 1228 4068 0.30 0.350 1424 0.86 Right Westbound Pri. Sec. Left Thru Right Northbound Pri. Sec. Left Thru TR 1346 0.550 Right Southbound Pri. Sec. Left Thru Right Sum (v/s) critical = 0.00 Lost Time/Cycle, L = 0.00 sec Critical v/c(X) = 0.00 LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEET Appr/ Ratios Unf Prog Lane Incremental Res Lane Group Approach Lane Del Adj Grp. Factor Del Del Grp v/c g/C dl . Fact Cap k d2 d3 Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound LT 0.86 0.350 24.2 1.000 1424 0.50 7.7 0.0 -31.9 C 31.9 C Westbound Northbound TR 0.550 1.000 0.50 0.0 Submitted into the public Southbound recorcL In connection Ith itemion —1 Walter Foeman City Clerk Intersection Delay 31.9 .(sec/veh) Intersection LOS - C • SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED LT WORKSHEET for exclusive lefts PROMCT.doc 19 0 0 _ 1 0 APPROACH EB Cycle Length, C 80.0 sec Actual Green Time for Lane Group, G Effective Green Time for Lane Group, g Opposing Effective Green Time, go Number of Lanes in Lane Group, N Number of Opposing Lanes, No Adjusted Left -Turn Flow Rate, Vlt Proportion of Left Turns in Opposing Flow, Plto Adjusted Opposing Flow Rate, Vo Lost Time for Lane Group, tl Left Turns per Cycle: LTC=V1tC/3600 Opposing Flow per Lane, Per Cycle: Volc=VoC/3600fluo Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo (Table 9-2 or Eqn 9-7) gf=[Gexp(- a * (LTC ** b))]-tl, gf<=g Opposing Queue Ratio: qro=1-Rpo(go/C) gq=(4.943Volc**0.762)[(gro**1.061)-tl], gq<=g gu =g-gq if gq>=gf, =g-gf if gq<gf n=(gq-gf)/2, n>=0 Ptho=1-Plto P1*=Plt[l+{(N-1)g/(gf+gu/Ell+4.24))) Ell (Figure 9-7) E12=(1-Ptho**n)/Plto, E12>=1.0 fmin=2(1+Plt)/g or fmin=2(1+P1)/g gdiff=max(gq-gf,0) fm-[gf/g]+[gu/g][1/{1+P1(Ell-1))], (min=fmin;max=1.00) flt=fm=[gf/g]+gdiff[1/{l+Plt(E12-1)}] WB NB SB +[gu/g][l/(1+Plt(E11-1)1,(min=fmin;max=1.0) or flt-[fm+0.9l(N-1)]/N** fit For special case of single -lane approach opposed by multilane approach. see text. * If P1>=1 for shared left -turn lanes with N>l, then assume de -facto left -turn lane and redo calculations. ** For permitted left -turns with multiple exclusive left -turn lanes, flt=fm. For special case of multilane approach opposed by single -lane approach or when gf>gq, see text. SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED LT WORKSHEET for shared lefts APPROACH EB Cycle Length, C 80.0 sec Actual Green Time for Lane Group, G Effective Green Time for Lane Group, g Opposing Effective Green Time, go Number of Lanes in Lane Group, N Number of Opposing Lanes, No Adjusted Left -Turn Flow Rate, Vlt Proportion of Left Turns in Lane Group, Pit Proportion of Left Turns in Opposing Flow, Pita Adjusted Opposing Flow Rate, Vo Lost Time for Lane Group, tl Left Turns per Cycle: LTC=V1tC/3600 Opposing Flow per Lane, Per Cycle: Volc=VoC/3600fluo Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo (Table 9-2 or Eqn 9-7) gf=[Gexp(- a * (LTC ** b))]-tl, gf<=g Opposing Queue Ratio: qro=1-Rpo(go/C) gq=(4.943Volc**0.762)[(gro**1.061)-tl], gq<=g Su =g-gq if gq>=gf, =g-gf if gq<gf n=(gq-gf)/2, n>=0 Ptho=1-Plto Pl*=Plt[l+{(N-1)9/(gf+gu/Ell+4.24))) Ell (Figure 9-7) E12=(1-Ptho**n)/Plto, E12>=1.0 fmin=2(1+Plt)/g or fmin=2(1+P1)/g gdiff=max(gq-gf,0) fm=[gf/g]+[gu/g][l/{1+P1(Ell-1)1], (min=fmin;max=1.00) PROJECT.doc WB NB SB Submitted into the public reco in connection with item on Walter Foe am n City Clerk 20 • . • flt=fm=[gf/g]+gdiff[1/11+P1t(E12-1)}] +[gu/91[1/(1+Plt(Ell-1)],(min=fmin;max=1.0) or flt=[fm+0.91(N-1)]/N-} flt Primary For special case of single -lane approach opposed by multilane approach see text. ' If P1>=1 for shared left -turn lanes with N>1, then assume de -facto left -turn lane and redo calculations. * For permitted left -turns with multiple exclusive left -turn lanes, flt=fm. For special case of multilane approach opposed by single -lane approach or when gf>gq, see text. SUPPLEMENTAL UNIFORM DELAY WORKSHEET Adj. LT Vol from Vol Adjustment Worksheet, v v/c ratio from Capacity Worksheet, X Primary phase effective green, g Secondary phase effective green, gq (From Supplemental Permitted IT Worksheet), gu Cycle length, C 80.0 Red=(C-g-gq-gu), r Arrivals: v/(3600(max(X,1.0))), qa Primary ph. departures: s/3600, sp Secondary ph. departures: s(gq+gu)/(gu*3600), ss XPerm XProt XCase Queue at begining of green arrow, Qa Queue at beginning of unsaturated green, Qu Residual queue, Qr Uniform Delay, dl EBLT WBLT NBLT SBLT DELAY/LOS WORKSHEET WITH INITIAL QUEUE • Initial Dur. Uniform Delay Initial Final Initial Lane Appr/ Unmet Unmet Queue Unmet Queue Group Lane Demand Demand Unadj. Adj. Param. Demand Delay Delay Group Q veh t hrs. ds dl sec u Q veh d3 sec d sec Lastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Intersection Delay 31.9 sec/veh Intersection LOS C Submitted Into the n JbI1C in connection with item On o . Walter Foeman City Clerk PROJECT.doc 21 00-106s • • HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 3.1 Analyst: J. TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) AHLSTEDT ANALYSIS Intersection: S 13TH ST AND MIAMI AVE Count Date: FUTURE W/PROJECP Time Period: PM PK Intersection Orientation: North -South Major St. Vehicle Volume Data: Movements: ---------------- 1 2 3 7 8 --- --------------------- 9 10 11 12 Volume: ------------------- 0 431 0 303 0 10 ---------------------- 17 0 11 HFR: 0 575 0 365 0 20 23 0 22 PHF: 1.00 0.75 1.00 0.83 1.00 0.50 0.75 1.00 0.50 PHV: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Pedestrian Volume Data: Movements Flow: -------------------- Lane width: Walk speed: % Blockage: Median Type: None # of vehicles: 0 Flared approach Movements: # of vehicles: Eastbound 0 # of vehicles: Westbound 0 Lane usage for movements 1,2&3 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R --------------------------------------------------------------------- N N Y Y N N Y Y Y Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 9,5&6 approach: L Lane 1 T R Lane 2 Lane 3 ------------------------------------------------------------ L T R L T R N N N N N N N -------------------------- N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 7.8&9 approach: L Lane 1 T R Lane 2 L Lane 3 -------------------------------------------------------------- T R L T R N N N N N N N -------------------------- N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 10,11&12 approach: Submitted Into the public L Tane 1 R L Tane 2 R L Taner•�3cord In connection witl', ------- N------N------N------N------N------N -----N---------� Channelized: N Walter Foeman Grade: 0.00 City Clerk Upstream Signal Data: ------------------------- PROJECT.doc 22 00 U916 Approach:Southbound L prot T Distance: 0 Progression Speed: 0 Cycle Length: 0 Green Time: 0 0 Arrival Type: 3 3 Saturation Flow Rate: 1700 1700 Progressed Flow: 0 0 Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street vehicles: -------------------------------------------------------------- Northbound Shared In volume, major th vehicles: 431 Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: 0 Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: 1700 Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: 1700 Number of major street through lanes: 1 Length of study period. hrs: 1.00 -------------------------------------------------------------- Worksheet 4 Critical Gap and Follow-up time calculation. Critical Gap Calculations: Movement 1 7 8 9 10 11 12 -------------------------------------------------------------- t c,base 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7,1 6.5 6.2 t c,hv 1,0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 P by 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t c,g 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 G 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t 3,lt 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 t c,T: 1 stage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t c 1 stage 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Follow Up Time Calculations: Movement 1 7 8 9 10 11 12 -------------------------------------------------------------- t f,base 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 t f,HV 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 P by 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t f 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 -------------------------------------------------------------- Worksheet 5a. Effect of Upstream Signals (Computation 1) Movement 2 Queue Clearance Time at Upstream Signal V prog Total Saturation Flow Rate, s (vph) Arrival Type Effective Green g eff (sec) Cycle Length, C (sec) Rp (from table 9-2) Proportion of vehicles arriving on green P g ql g q2 G q ------------------------------------------ Worksheet 5b. Effect of upstream signals (computation 2) Movement 2 Proprtion of time blocked --------------------------------------------------------- alpha 0.550 beta 60.645 t a .803803 F 0.293 f PROJECT.doc Southbound 0 0 1700 1700 0 Submitted into the public recOrV,, in connection item�®n / � � With Walter F� ----------------------- _Q0a�-- Clty Clerk 23 • • 0 !. • Potential Capacity 431 431 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.00 0,00 Movement Capacity 0 0 Probability of Queue free St. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0.00 0.00 Step 4: LT from Minor St. ------------------------------------------ 7 10 Conflicting Flows 586 585 Potential Capacity 425 426 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Maj, L, Min T Impedance factor 0.00 0.00 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.00 0.00 Cap, Adj, factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.00 0.00 Movement Capacity --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0 0 Worksheet 10 delay,queue length, and LOS Movement 1 4 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 7 8 9 10 11 12 I v(vph) I II I C m(vph) 1008 vic 95% queue length Control Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- x Worksheet 11 Shared Major LT Impedance and Delay Rank 1 Delay Calculations Movement --------------------------------------------------- 2 5 P oj- 0.00 ----------------------------- 1.00 V it 431 0 V i2 0 0 S it S i2 1700 1700 P* 0j 1700 1700 D maj left 0.00 0.0 1.00 0.0 N number major st lanes 1 0 Delay, rank 1 mvmns ---------------------------------------------------- 0.0 0.0 PROJECT. doc Submitted into the Irecor in connection with Item 115 coon with Walter F�" man CRY Cleric 25 U0—iUS • Jackson M. Ahlstedt Jackson M. Ahlstedt, P.E. Jackson M. Ahlstedt, P.E. 46 N.W. 94th Street Miami Shores, Florida 33150 Phone: (305) 754-8695 E-Mail: Intersection: City/State: Analyst: Project No: Time Period Analyzed: Date: East/West Street Name: North/South Street Name HCS: Signals Release 3.1 Fax: (305) 754-6695 OPERATIONAL ANALYS SW 13TH ST\SW 1ST AVE MIAMI/FLORIDA J. AHLSTEDT PARK PLACE PM PK HR - FUTURE W/PROJECT 6/5i00 SW 13TH STREET SW 1ST AVENUE VOLUME DATA I Eastbound I Westbound I L T R I L T R I i Volume 1 713 49 133 1444 PHF 1 0.89 0.69 10.75 0.85 PK 15 Vol 1 200 18 Ill 425 Hi Ln Vol I 1 % Grade 1 0 I 0 Ideal Sat 1 1900 1 1900 ParkExist 1 Ha % 1 1 Heavy Veh1 0 0 10 0 No. Lanes 1 0 2 0 1 0 2 0 LGConfig I TR I LT Lane Width I 12.0 1 12.0 RTOR Vol I 0 1 Adj Flow 1 872 1 1743 %InSharedLn I I Prop Turns 1 0.08 10.03 NumPeds 1 0 1 NumBus I 0 1 0 ( Northbound L T R I I Southbound I L T R I 170 0 26 1139 222 371 10.58 0.90 0.72 10.74 0.68 0.89 130 0 9 147 82 104 I i 0 I 1 0 i 1900 11900 1900 1900 I 10 0 0 I 10 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 LTR I L T R 1 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 i 0 i 0 1 157 1188 326 417 I 10.77 0.23 I 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 10 0 0 Duration 1.00 Area Type: All other areas OPERATING PARAMETERS Eastbound 1 Westbound 1 Northbound I Southbound 1 1 L T R I L T R i L T R I L T R I Init Unmet I 0.0 i 0.0 1 0.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 1 Arriv. Type l 3 I 3 1 3 13 3 3 1 Unit Est. I 3.0 i 3.0 1 3.0 13.0 3.0 3.0 1 I Factor I 1.000 1 1.000 1 1.000 1 1.000 I Lost Time 1 2.0 1 2.0 1 2.0 12.0 2.0 2.0 1 Ext of g 1 2.0 1 2.0 1 2.0 12.0 2.0 2.0 1 Ped Min g 1 0.0 1 0.0 i 0.0 1 0.0 i PHASE DATA Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 Sut7mitte(d into the public EB Left 1 NB Left A record in Connection with Thru P i Thru A Item �Z_ Right P 1 Right A Walter Foeman Peds I Ped PROJECT.doc City Clegg • .7 WB Left P Thru P • Right Peds NB Right SB Right Green 33.0 Yellow 4.0 All Red 0.0 Cycle Length: 60.0 Appr.i Mvt Movement Volume PHF SB Left A j Thru A I Right A Ped I EB Right I WB Right I I 19.0 4.0 0.0 secs _VOLUME ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET Adjusted Prop. Prop. Flow No. Lane Flow Rate Left Right Rate Lanes Group RTOR In Lane Grp Turns Turns Eastbound Left 0 Thru 713 0.89 801 ' 2 TR 872 0.06 Right 49 0.69 71 0 0 Westbound Left 33 0.75 44 0 Thru 1444 0.85 1699 2 LT 1743 0.03 Right 0 Northbound Left 70 0.58 121 0 Thru 0 0.90 0 1 LTR 157 0.77 0.23 Right 26 0..72 36 0 0 Southbound Submitted into the public Left 139 0.74 188 1 L 188 recor In connection with ThruRight 0.89 326 1 T 326 item 4�� 1L Right 371 371 0.89 417 1 R 0 417 on - Walter Foeman Value entered by user. City Clerk SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET Appri Ideal Adj Lane Sat f f f f f f f f" f Sat Group Flow W HV G P BB A LU RT LT Flow Eastbound Sec LT Adj/LT Sat: TR 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 0.95 0.988 1.000 3566 Westbound Sec LT Adj/LT Sat: LT 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 0.95 1.000 0.913 3298 Northbound Sec LT Adj/LT Sat: LTR 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 1.00 0.869 0.359 594 Southbound L 1900 1.000 Sec LT Adj/LTSat: - 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 1.00 0.558 1061 T 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.000 1.000 1900 R 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 1.00 0.850 ---- 1615 PROJECT.doc 27 66-1036 CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Adj Adj Sat Flow Green --Lane Group-- Appri Lane Flow Rate Flow Rate Ratio Ratio Capacity vic Mvmt Group (v) (s) (vis) (g/C) (c) Ratio Eastbound Pri. Sec. Left Thru TR 872 3566 0.24 0.550 1961 0.44 Right Westbound Pri. Sec. Left. Thru IT 1743 3298 # 0.53 0.550 1814 0.96 Right Northbound Pri. Sec. Left 'Thru LTR 157 594 # 0.26 0.317 188 0.84 Right Southbound Pri. Sec. Left L 188 1061 0.18 0.317 336 0.56 Thru T 326 1900 0.17 0.317 602 0.54 Right R 417 1615 0.26 0.317 511 0.82 • Sum (vis) critical = 0.79 Lost Time/Cycle. L = 8.00 sec Critical vic(X) = 0.91 LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEET Appri Ratios Unf Prog Lane Incremental Res Lane Group Approach Lane Del Adj Grp Factor Del Del Grp vic g/C dl Fact Cap k d2 d3 Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound TR 0.44 0.550 8.0 1.000 1961 0.50 0.7 0.0 8.8 A 8.8 A Westbound LT 0.96 0.550 12.9 1.000 1814 0.50 19.2 0.0 32.0 C 32.0 C E CL eD U Northbound O O \ LL q LTR 0.84 0.317 19.0 1.000 188 0.37 32.5 0.0 51.5 D 51.5 D O c OCO O Southbound -p vJ C L 0.56 0.317 17.0 1.000 336 0.16 2.1 0.0 19.1 B '- 1 T 0.54 0.317 16.9 1.000 602 0.14 1.0 0.0 17.9 B 18.4 B R 0.82 0.317 18.9 1.000 511 0.36 10.8 0.0 29.7 C E oo Intersection Delay = 24.7 (seciveh) Intersection LOS = C N SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED LT WORKSHEET for exclusive lefts PROJECT. doc 28 -�.0 15 • APPROACH EB WB NB SB Cycle Length, C 60.0 sec Actual Green Time for Lane Group, G 19.0 Effective Green Time for Lane Group, g 19.00 Opposing Effective Green Time, go 19.0 Number of Lanes in Lane Group, N 1 Number of Opposing Lanes, No 1 Adjusted Left -Turn Flow Rate, Vlt 188 Proportion of Left Turns in Opposing Flow, Plto 0.77 Adjusted Opposing Flow Rate, Vo 157 Lost Time for Lane Group, tl 4.00 Left Turns per Cycle: LTC=V1tC/3600 3.13 Opposing Flow per Lane, Per Cycle: Volc=VoC/3600fluo 2.62 Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo (Table 9-2 or Eqn 9-7) 1.00 gf=[Gexp(- a * (LTC ** b))]-tl, gf<=g 0.0 Opposing Queue Ratio: qro=1-Rpo(go/C) 0.68 gq=(4.943Volc**0.762)[(gro**1.061)-tl], gq<-g Z.87 gu =g-gq if gq>=gf, =g-gf if gq<gf 16.13 n=(gq-gf)/2, n>=0 1.43 Ptho=1-Plto 0.23 P1*=Plt[l+{(N-1)g/(gf+gu/Ell+4.24))) 1.00 Ell (Figure 9-7) 1.52 E12=(1-Ptho**n)/Plto, E12>=1.0 1.14 fmin=2(1+Plt)/g or fmin=2(1+P1)/g 0.21 gdiff=max(gq-gf,0) 2.87 fm=[gf/g]+[gu/g][1/{1+P1(E11-1)}], (min=fmin;max=1.00) 0.56 flt=fm=[gf/g]+gdiff[l/{1+Plt(E12-1)}] +[gu/91[1/(1+Plt(Ell-1)],(min=fmin;max=1.0) or flt=[fm+0.91(N-1)]/N** fit 0.558 For special case of single -lane approach opposed by multilane approach, see text. * If P1>=1 for shared left -turn lanes with N>l, then assume de -facto left -turn lane and redo calculations. +�* For permitted left -turns with multiple exclusive left -turn lanes, flt=fm. For special case of multilane approach opposed by single -lane approach or when gf>gq, see text. SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED LT WORKSHEET for shared lefts APPROACH EB WB NB SB Cycle Length, C 60.0 sec Actual Green Time for Lane Group, G 33.0 19.0 Effective Green Time for Lane Group, g 33.00 19.00 Opposing Effective Green Time, go 33.0 19.0 Number of Lanes in Lane Group, N 2 1 Number of Opposing Lanes, No 2 1 Adjusted Left -Turn Flow Rate, Vlt 44 121 Z=p C Proportion of Left Turns in Lane Group, Pit Proportion of Left Turns in Opposing Flow, Plto 0.03 0.77 'Q � 0.00 0.00 Q U Adjusted Opposing Flow Rate, Vo 872 326 O� ®\ O Lost Time for Lane Group, tl 4.00 4.00 �- Left Turns per Cycle: LTC=V1tC/3600 0.73 2.02 Opposing Flow per Lane, Per Cycle: Volc=VoC/3600fluo 7.65 5.43 O C �a Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo (Table 9-2 or Eqn 9-7) 1.00 1.00 C O O gf=[Gexp(- a * (LTC ** b))]-tl, gf<=g 12.3 0.4 V Opposing Queue Ratio: qro-l-Rpo(go/C) 0.45 0.68 C C gq=(4.943Volc**0.762)[(gro**1.061)-tl], gq<-g 5.24 7.99 +: gu =g-gq if gq>=gf, =g-gf if gq<gf 20.71 11.01 E n=(gq-gf)/2, n>=0 0.00 3.78 -0 O Ptho=1-Plto Pl*=Plt[l+{(N-1)g/(gf+gu/Ell+4.24))) 1.00 1.00 M ico O "� 0.06 0.77 Ell (Figure 9-7) 3.45 1.93 4 E12=(1-Ptho**n)/Plto, E12>=1.0 1.00 1.00 fmin=2(1+Plt)/g or fmin=2(1+P1)/g 0.06 0.19 gdiff=max(gq-gf,0) 0.00 0.00 fm=[gf/g]+[gu/g][1/{l+P1(Ell-1)}], (min=fmin;max=1.00) 0.92 0.36 PROJECT. doc 29 UU-1036 • • flt=fm=[gfig]+gdiff[li{1+Plt(E12-1)}] +[guig][li(l+Plt(Ell-1)],(min=fmin:max=1.0) or flt=[fm+0.91(N-1)]/N** flt Primary 0.913 0.359 ISFor special case of single -lane approach opposed by multilane approach, see text. * If Pl>=1 for shared left -turn lanes with N>1, then assume de -facto left -turn lane and redo calculations. *; For permitted left -turns with multiple exclusive left -turn lanes, flt=fm. For special case of multilane approach opposed by single -lane approach or when gf>gq, see text. SUPPLEMENTAL UNIFORM DELAY WORKSHEET EBLT WBLT NBLT SBLT Adj. IT Vol from Vol Adjustment Worksheet, v vic ratio from Capacity Worksheet, X Primary phase effective green, g Secondary phase effective green, gq (From Supplemental Permitted IT Worksheet), gu Cycle length, C 60.0 Red=(C-g-gq-gu), r Arrivals: vi(3600(max(X,1.0))), qa Primary ph. departures: si3600, sp Secondary ph. departures: s(gq+gu)i(gut3600), ss XPerm XProt XCase Queue at begining of green arrow, Qa Queue at beginning of unsaturated green, Qu Residual queue, Qr Uniform Delay, dl DELAY/LOS WORKSHEET WITH INITIAL QUEUE • Initial Dur. Uniform Delay Initial Final Initial Lane Appri Unmet Unmet Queue Unmet Queue Group Lane Demand Demand Unadj. Adj. Param. Demand Delay Delay Group Q veh t hrs. ds dl sec u Q veh d3 sec d sec Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Intersection Delay 24.7 seciveh Intersection LOS C ® Submitted into the public record in connon � ti� with PROJECT.doc Ite Walter Foeman till City Clerk 00--J.036 0 0 • Jackson M. Ahlstedt Jackson M. Ahlstedt, P.E. Jackson M. Ahlstedt, P.E. 46 N.W. 94th Street Miami Shores, Florida 33150 Phone: (305) 754-8695 E-Mail: HCS: Signals Release 3.1 Fax: (305) 754-8695 OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Intersection: 13TH ST\S MIAMI AVE City/State: MIAMI/FLORIDA Analyst: J. AHLSTEDT Project No: PARK PLACE Time Period Analyzed: PM PK HR - FUTURE W/PROJECT Date: 6/5/00 East/West Street Name: SW 13TH STREET North/South Street Name: SOUTH MIAMI AVENUE VOLUME DATA I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound 1 I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R 1 Volume 1165 562 88 146 1274 163 197 334 73 118 159 263 I PHF 10.74 0.90 0.59 10.65 0.91 0.78 10.81 0.81 0.54 10.67 0.78 0.81 1 PK 15 Vol 156 156 37 118 350 52 130 103 34 17 51 81 1 Hi Ln Vol I I I I I % Grade 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 I Ideal Sat 11900 1900 1 1900 1 1900 1 1900 i ParkExist I I I I I NumPark 1 % Heavy Veh10 0 0 10 0 0 10 0 0 10 0 0 1 No. Lanes 1 0 2 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 2 0 I LGConfig I DefL TR I LTR I LTR I LTR 1 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 1 12.0 1 12.0 1 12.0 1 RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 Adj Flow 1223 773 1 1680 1 667 1 556 I %InSharedLnl I I I i Prop Turns 10.00 0.19 10.04 0.12 10.18 0.20 10.05 0.58 1 NumPeds 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 I NumBus 10 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 Duration 1.00 Area Type: All other areas OPERATING PARAMETERS I Eastbound 1 L T R I Init Unmet 10.0 0.0 Arriv. Type13 3 Unit Ext. 13.0 3.0 I Factor 1 1.000 Lost Time 12.0 2.0 Ext of g 12.0 2.0 Ped Min g 1 0.0 Westbound L T R 0.0 3 3.0 1.000 2.0 2.0 0.0 1 Northbound i L T R I 1 0.0 I 3 i 3.0 1 1.000 i 2.0 1 2.0 1 0.0 Southbound L T R 0.0 3 3.0 1.000 2.0 2.0 0.0 PHASE DATA Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 7 8 Slibmitted Into EB Loft P NB Left A record in conn the Public . item ection Right P I Right A on with, Peds I Ped --(/ PROJECT.doc Walter Foeman CitV Clerk 00-111-1 U36 31 • 0 WB Left P I SB Left A Thru P I Thru A Right P I Right A Peds I Ped NB Right EB Right SB Right I I WB Right I I Green 33.0 Yellow 4.0 All Red 1.0 Cycle Length: 60.0 Appr./ Mvt Movement Volume PHF 17.0 4.0 1.0 secs VOLUME ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET Adjusted Prop. Prop. Flow No. Lane Flow Rate Left Right Rate Lanes Group RTOR In Lane Grp Turns Turns Eastbound Left 165 0.74 223 0 DefL 223 Thru 562 0.90 624 2 TR 773 0.00 0.19 Right 88 0.59 149 0 0 Westbound Left 46 0.65 71 0 V t C Thru 1274 0.91 1400 2 LTR 1680 0.04 0.12 = CO a) Right 163 0.78 209 0 0 U �' C Northbound :L-:t, Left 97 0.81 120 0 ZZ U Thru 334 0.81 412 2 LTR 667 0.18 0.20 O C O -0.- co Right 73 0.54 135 0 0 v V Southbound C 1 Left 18 0.67 27 0 Thru 159 0.78 204 2 LTR 556 0.05 0.58 E a (y Right 263 0.81 325 0 0 A� U E * Value entered by user. 07 •� SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET Appr/ Ideal Adj Lane Sat f £ f f f f f f- f Sat Group Flow W HV G P BB A LU RT LT Flow Eastbound Sec LT Adj/LT Sat: DefL 1900 1.000 1.000 ---- 1.00 ---- TR 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 1.00 0.971 1.000 1845 Westbound Sec LT Adj/LT Sat: LTR 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 0.95 0.981 0.887 3144 Northbound Sec LT Adj/LT Sat: LTR 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 0.95 0.970 0.666 2331 Southbound Sec LT Adj/LT Sat: ® LTR 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 0.95 0.912 0.903 2973 PROJECT. doc 32 • CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Adj Adj Sat Flow Green --Lane Group-- Appri Lane Flow Rate Flow Rate Ratio Ratio Capacity vic Mvmt. Group (v) (s) (vis) (S/C) (a) Ratio Eastbound Pri. Sec. Left DefL 223 0.000 Thru TR 773 1845 0.42 0.550 1015 0.76 Right Westbound Pri. Sec. Left Thru LTR 1680 3144 # 0.53 0.550 1729 0.97 Right Northbound Pri. Sec. Left Thru LTR 667 2331 # 0.29 0.283 660 1.01 Right Southbound Pri. Sec. Left Thru LTR 556 2973 0.19 0.283 842 0.66 Right Sum (vis) critical = 0.82 Lost Time/Cycle, L = 8.00 sec Critical Vic(X) = 0.93 LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEET Appri Ratios Unf Prog Lane Incremental Res Lane Group Approach Lane Del Adj Grp Factor Del Del Grp vic g/C dl Fact Cap k d2 d3 Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound Deft 0.000 1.000 0.0 TR 0.76 0.550 10.5 1.000 1015 0.50 5.6 0.0 16.0 B 16.0 B Westbound LTR 0.97 0.550 13.0 1.000 1729 0.50 24.2 0.0 37.3 D 37.3 D Northbound C.1 C LTR 1.01 0.283 21.5 1.000 660 0.50 80.6 0.0 102.1 F .102.1 F Q ca E a)O ie Southbound `.) U (D LTR 0.66 0.283 19.0 1.000 842 0.24 1.9 0.0 20.9 C 20.9 C C o p c� cc Intersection Delay = 0) C 1 42.1 (seciveh) Intersection LOS = D E a) SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED LT WORKSHEET ) for exclusive lefts PROJECT.doc 33 APPROACH EB Cycle Length, C 60.0 sec Actual Green Time for Lane Group, G 0.0 Effective Green Time for Lane Group, g 33.00 Opposing Effective Green Time, go 33.0 Number of Lanes in Lane Group, N' 1 Number of Opposing Lanes, No 2 Adjusted Left -Turn Flow Rate, Vlt 223 Proportion of Left Turns in Opposing Flow, Plto 0.04 Adjusted Opposing Flow Rate, Vo 1680 Lost Time for Lane Group, tl 0.00 Left Turns per Cycle: LTC=V1tC/3600 3.92 Opposing Flow per Lane, Per Cycle: Volc=VoC/3600fluo 14.74 Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo (Table 9-2 or Eqn 9-7) 1.00 gf=[Gexp(- a * (LTC ** b))]-tl, gf<=g 0.0 Opposing Queue Ratio: qro=1-Rpo(go/C) 0.45 gq=(4.943Volc**0.762)[(gro**1.061)-tl], gq<-g. 22.07 gu =g-gq i£ gq>=gf, =g-gf if gq<gf 10.93 n=(gq-gf)/2, n>=0 11.03 Ptho=1-Plto 0.96 P1*=Plt[1+{(N-1)9/(gf+gu/E11+4.24))) 1.00 E11 (Figure 9-7) 6.93 E12=(1-Ptho**n)/Plto, E12>-1.0 8.97 fmin=2(1+Plt)/g or fmin=2(1+P1)/g 0.12 gdiff=max(gq-gf,0) 22.07 fm=[gf/g]+[gu/9][1/{1+P1(Ell-1)1], (min=fmin;max=1.00) 0.12 flt=fm=[gf/g]+gdiff[l/fl+Plt(E12-1)1] WB NB SB Submitted into the public itemconnection �_ on _/L-/C with Faller jPn +[gu/g][1/(1+plt(Ell-1)],(min=fmin;max=1.0) or flt=[fm+0.9l(N-1)]/N** eman fit City Clerk For special case of single -lane approach opposed by multilane approach, see text. * If P1>=1 for shared left -turn lanes with N>l, then assume de -facto left -turn lane and redo calculations. ** For permitted left -turns with multiple exclusive left -turn lanes, flt=fm. For special case of multilane approach opposed by single -lane approach or when gf>gq, see text. SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED LT WORKSHEET .for shared lefts APPROACH Cycle Length, C 60.0 sec Actual Green Time for Lane Group, G Effective Green Time for Lane Group, g Opposing Effective Green Time, go Number of Lanes in Lane Group, N Number of Opposing Lanes, No Adjusted Left -Turn Flow Rate, Vlt Proportion of Left Turns in Lane Group, Pit Proportion of Left Turns in Opposing Flow, Plto Adjusted Opposing Flow Rate, Vo Lost Time for Lane Group, tl Left Turns per Cycle: LTC=V1tC/3600 Opposing Flow per Lane, Per Cycle: Volc-VoC/3600fluo Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo (Table 9-2 or Eqn 9-7) gf=[Gexp(- a * (LTC ** b))]-tl, gf<=g Opposing Queue Ratio: qro=l-Rpo(go/C) gq=(4.943Volc**0.762)[(gro**1.061)-tl], gq<-g gu =g-gq if qq>=Sf, =g-gf if gq<gf n=(gq-gf)/2, n>=0 Ptho=1-Plto P1*=Plt[l+l(N-1)9/(gf+gu/E11+4.24))) Ell (Figure 9-7) E12=(1-Ptho**n)/Plto, E12>=1.0 fmin=2(1+Plt)/g or fmin=2(1+P1)/g gdiff=max(gq-gf,0) fm=[gf/g]+[gu/9][1/11+P1(E11-1)1], (min=fmin;max=1.00) PROJECT.doc EB WB NB SB 33.0 17.0 17.0 33.00 17.00 17.00 33.0 17.0 17.0 2 2 2 2 2 2 71 120 27 0.04 0.18 0.05 0.00 0.05 0.18 773 556 667 4.00 4.00 4.00 1.18 2.00 0.45 6.44 4.88 5.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 8.2 0.0 6.3 0.45 0.72 0.72 3.38 4.35 6.42 24.80 12.65 10.58 0.00 2.17 0.04 1.00 0.95 0.82 0.11 0.51 0.11 3.00 2.50 2.80 1.00 2.11 1.00 0.07 0.18 0.13 0.00 4.35 0.08 0.86 0.42 0.90 34 V I U 3 i • flt=fm=[gf/g]+gdiff[1/{1+Plt(E12-1)}] +[guig]11i(1+Plt(Ell-1)],(min=fmin;max=1.0) or flt=[fm+0.91(N-1)]/N-- flt Primary 0.687 0.666 0.903 • For special case of single -lane approach opposed by multilane approach, see text. If P1>=1 for shared left -turn lanes with N>1, then assume de -facto left -turn lane and redo calculations. $* For permitted left -turns with multiple exclusive left -turn lanes, flt=fm. For special case of multilane approach opposed by single -lane approach or when gf>gq, see text. SUPPLEMENTAL UNIFORM DELAY WORRSHEET EBLT WBLT NBLT SBLT Adj. LT Vol from Vol Adjustment Worksheet, v v/c ratio from Capacity Worksheet, X Primary phase effective green, g Secondary phase effective green, gq (From Supplemental Permitted LT Worksheet), gu Cycle length, C 60.0 Red=(C-g-gq-gu), r Arrivals: vi(3600(max(X,1.0))), qa Primary ph. departures: s/3600, sp Secondary ph. departures: s(gq+gu)/(gu*3600), ss XPerm XProt XCase Queue at begining of green arrow, Qa Queue at beginning of unsaturated green, Qu Residual queue, Qr Uniform Delay, dl DELAY/LOS WORKSHEET WITH INITIAL QUEUE ® Initial Dur. Uniform Delay Initial Final Initial Lane Appr/ Unmet Unmet Queue Unmet Queue Group Lane Demand Demand Unadj. Adj. Param. Demand Delay Delay Group Q veh t hrs. ds dl sec u Q veh d3 sec d sec Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Intersection Delay 42.1 sec/veh Intersection LOS D Subrnitted into reoor in connerg on with PROJECT.doc 1t@R1,� with on ,Z%%�'� Fatter Foeman City Clerk 00-103� 35 • Jackson M. Ahlstedt Jackson M. Ahlstedt, P.E. Jackson M. Ahlstedt, P.E. 46 N.W. 94th Street Miami Shores, Florida 33150 Phone: (305) 754-8695 E-Mail: HCS: Signals Release 3.1 Fax: (305) 754-8695 OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Intersection: SE 13TH ST\BRICKELL AVE City/State: MIAMI/FLORIDA Analyst: J. AHLSTEDT Project No: PARK PLACE Time Period Analyzed: PM PK HR - FUTURE W/PROJECT Date: 6/5/00 East/West Street Name: SE 13TH STREET North/South Street Name: BRICKELL AVENUE VOLUME DATA I Eastbound 1 Westbound 1 Northbound I Southbound 1 L T R I L T R i L T R I L T R 1 I I i I I Volume 1401 195 239 1183 411 148 1439 1800 Ill 195 1871 755 1 PHF 10.80 0.76 0.92 10.76 0.75 0.70 10.91 0.88 0.60 10.74 0.94 0.88 1 PK 15 Vol 1125 64 65 160 137 53 1121 511 46 132 - 498 214 1 Hi Ln Vol I I i I I % Grade 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 Ideal Sat J1900 1900 1900 11900 1900 1900 11900 1900 11900 1900 1900 1 ParkExist I I I I I NuHak I I I I 1 i Heavy Veh 10 0 0 10 0 0 10 0 0 10 0 0 1 No. Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 1 1 LGConfig 1 L IT R I L T R I L TR 1 L T R 1 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 1 RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 Adj Flow 1501 257 260 1241 548 211 1482 2230 1128 1990 858 1 %InSharedLnIO I I I I Prop Turns 10.00 1 i 0.08 1 J NumPeds 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 NumBus 10 0 0 10 0 0 10 0 10 0 0 1 Duration 1.00 Area Type: All other areas OPERATING PARAMETERS 1 Eastbound 1 Westbound i Northbound I Southbound 1 1 L T R 1 L T R i L T R 1 L T RCo 1U Init Unmet 10.0 0.0 0.0 E 1 jo.o o.o o.a jO.o o.o jo.o o.o o.o � � � Arriv. Type13 3 3 13 3 3 13 3 13 3 3 1� � U Unit Ext. 13.0 3.0 3.0 13.0 3.0 3.0 13.0 3.0 13.0 3.0 3.0 Ig O LL 0 I Factor ( 1.000 1 1.000 i 1.000 1 1.000 1� = �. U Lost Time 12.0 2.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 2.0 1� 2 Ext of g 12.0 2.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 2.0 10 c c Co Ped Min g 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1� 0 0 U � PHASE DATA Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 E EB Left A J NB Left P U Thru A 1 Thru P CA Right A 1 Right P Peds 1 Ped PROJECT.doc 36 00-iu"36 WB Left A I SB Left P Thru A I Thru P Right A I Right P Peds I Ped NB Right I EB Right SB Right I WB Right I Green 15.0 16.0 I 69.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 4.0 All Red 1.0 1.0 1.0 Cycle Length: 115.0 Appr./ MVt Movement Volume PHF secs VOLUME ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET Adjusted Prop. Prop. Flow No. Lane Flow Rate Left Right Rate Lanes Group RTOR In Lane Grp Turns Turns Eastbound Left 401 0.80 501 1 L 501 Thru 195 0.76 257 1 LT 257 0.00 Right 239 0.92 260 1 R 0 260 Westbound Left 183 0.76 241 1 L 241 Thru 411 0.75 548 1 T 548 Right 148 0.70 211 1 R 0 211 Northbound Left 439 0.91 482 1 L 482 ® Thru 1800 0.88 2045 2 TR 2230 0.08 Right ill 0.60 185 0 0 Sljbmitta Southbound record In ClntO the Left 95 0.74 128 1 L 128 @m _/G, onn, pablic Thru 1871 0.94 1990 2 T 1990 U Ction 5,y. Right 75S 0.88 858 1 R 0 858 n t» Walter +� Value entered by user. @!1� an SATURATION FLOW ADJUS114ENT WORKSHEET Appr/ Ideal Adj Lane Sat f f f f f f f f_ f Sat Group Flow W HV G P BB A LU RT LT Flow Eastbound Sec IT Adj/LT Sat: L 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 1.00 ---- 0.950 1805 LT 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.000 1.000 1900 R 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 1.00 0.850 ---- 1615 Westbound Sec LT Adj/LT Sat: L 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 1.00 ---- 0.950 1805 T 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.000 1.000 1900 R 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 1.00 0.850 ---- 1615 Northbound Sec IT Adj/LT Sat: L 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 1.00 ---- 0.058 110 TR 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 0.95 0.988 1.000 3565 Southbound Sec IT Adj/LT Sat: • L 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 1.00 ---- 0.058 110 T 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 0.95 1.000 1.000 3610 R 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 1.00 0.850 ---- 1615 PROJECT.doc 37 0 0- 1 0 3 6 CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Appri Lane Adj Flow Rate Adj Sat Flow Flow Rate Ratio Green Ratio --Lane Group-- Mvmt Group (v) (s) (vis) (giC) Capacity (c) vic Ratio Eastbound Pri. Sec. Left L Thru LT 501 1805 # 0.28 0.130 235 2.13 Right R 257 260 1900 0.14 0.130 248 1.04 1615 0.16 0.130 211 1.23 Westbound Pri. Sec. Left L Thru T 241 1805 0.13 0.139 251 0.96 Right R 548 211 1900 # 0.29 0.139 264 2.08 1615 0.13 0.139 225 0.94 Northbound Pri. Sec. Left L Thru TR 482 110 # 4.38 0.600 66 7.30 Right 2230 3565 0.63 0.600 2139 1.04 Southbound Pri. Sec. Left L Thru T 128 110 1.16 0.600 66 1.94 Right R 1990 858 3610 0.55 0.600 2166 0.92 1615 0.53 0.600 969 0.89 Lost Time/Cycle, Sum (vls) critical = L = 12.00 sec Critical vic(X) = 4.95 5.52 LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEET Appri Ratios Lane Unf Prog Lane Incremental Res Lane Group Approach Del Adj Grp Factor Del Del Grp vic g/C dl Fact Cap k d2 d3 Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 2.13 0.130 50.0 1.000 235 0.50 0.0 LT 1.04 0.130 50.0 1.000 248 0.50 153.5 0.0 203.5 F 203.5 F R 1.23 0.130 50.0 1.000 211 0.50 459.2 0.0 509.2 F_ Westbound L 0.96 0.139 49.2 1.000 251 0.47 77.8 0.0 126.9 F T 2.08 0.139 49.5 1.000 264 0.50 0.0 126.9 F R 0.94 0.139 49.0 1.000 225 0.45 67.8 0.0 116.8 F C.) s c� "� Northbound 3' y U L 7.30 0.600 TR 1.04 23.0 1.000 66 0.50 0.0 CL 0 pEj LL 0.600 23.0 1.000 2139 0.50 93.5 0.0 116.5 F 116.5 F + ej U Southbound p C C: n co L 1..94 0.600 23.0 1.000 66 0.50 0.0 v T 0.92 0.600 20.5 1.000 2166 0.50 8.9 0.0 29.4 C 29.4 C C R 0.89 0.600 19.6 1.000 969 0.50 13.5 0.0 33.1 C Intersection Delay = 107.6 (seciveh) Intersection LOS = F U E SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED IT WORKSHEET for exclusive lefts PR0.IECT.doc 38 00-iu"36 ® • APPROACH EB WB NB SB Cycle Length, C 115.0 sec Actual Green Time for Lane Group, G 69.0 69.0 Effective Green Time for Lane Group, g • 69.00 69.00 Opposing Effective Green Time, go 69.0 69.0 Number of Lanes in Lane Group, N 1 1 Number of Opposing Lanes, No 2 2 Adjusted Left -Turn Flow Rate, Vlt 482 128 Proportion of Left Turns in Opposing Flow, Plto 0.00 0.00 Adjusted Opposing Flow Rate, Vo 1990 2230 Lost Time for Lane Group, tl 4.00 4.00 Left Turns per Cycle: LTC=V1tC/3600 15.40 4.09 Opposing Flow per Lane, Per Cycle: Volc=VoC/3600fluo 33.46 37.49 Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo (Table 9-2 or Eqn 9-7) 1.00 1.00 gf=[Gexp(- a * (LTC ** b))]-tl, gf<=g 0.0 0.0 Opposing Queue Ratio: qro=1-Rpo(go/C) 0.40 0.40 gq=(4.943Volc**0.762)[(gro**1.061)-tl], gq<-g 60.01 69.00 gu =g-gq if gq>=gf, =g-gf if gq<gf 6.99 0.00 n=(gq-gf)/2, n>=0 30.01 34.50 Ptho=l-Plto 1.00 1.00 P1*=PltIl+{(N-1)g/(gf+gu/Ell+4.24))) 1.00 1.00 Ell (Figure 9-7) 9.53 12.24 E12=(1-Ptho**n)/Plto, E12>=1.0 1.00 1.00 fmin=2(1+Plt)/g or fmin=2(1+P1)/g 0.06 0.06 gdiff=max(gq-gf,0) 0.00 0.00 fm=[gf/g]+[gu/9][1/{l+Pl(Ell-1)}], (min=fmin;max=1.00) 0.06 0.06 flt=fm=[gf/g]+gdiff[l/{l+Plt(E12-1)}] +[gu/91[1/(l+Plt(Ell-1)],(min=fmin;max=1.0) or flt=[fm+0.91(N-1)]/N** fit 0.058 0.058 For special case of single -lane approach opposed by multilane approach, see text. * If P1>=1 for shared left -turn lanes with N>l, then assume de -facto left -turn lane and redo calculations. ** For permitted left -turns with multiple exclusive left -turn lanes, flt=fm. For special case of multilane approach opposed by single -lane approach or when gf>gq, see text. SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED LT WORKSHEET for shared lefts APPROACH Cycle Length, C 115.0 sec Actual Green Time for Lane Group, G Effective Green Time for Lane Group, g Opposing Effective Green Time, go Number of Lanes in Lane Group, N Number of Opposing Lanes, No Adjusted Left -Turn Flow Rate, Vlt Proportion of Left Turns in Lane Group, Pit Proportion of Left Turns in Opposing Flow, Plto Adjusted Opposing Flow Rate, Vo Lost Time for Lane Group. tl Left Turns per Cycle: LTC=V1tC/3600 Opposing Flow per Lane, Per Cycle: Volc=VoC/3600fluo Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo (Table 9-2 or Eqn 9-7) gf=[Gexp(- a * (LTC ** b))]-tl, gf<=g Opposing Queue Ratio: qro=1-Rpo(go/C) gq=(4.943Volc**0.762)[(gro**1.061)-tl], gq<=g gu =g-gq if gq>=gf, =g-gf if gq<gf n=(gq-gf)/2, n>=0 Ptho=1-Plto Pl*=Plt[l+{(N-1)9/(gf+gu/Ell+4.24))) Ell (Figure 9-7) E12=(1-Ptho**n)/Plto, E12>=1.0 fmin=2(1+Plt)/g or fmin=2(1+P1)/g gdiff=max(gq-gf,0) fm=[gf/g]+[gu/9][1/{l+Pl(Ell-1)}], (min=fmin;max=1.00) PROJECT.doc EB WB NB SB Submitted into the public record in connegtion with item ?2_-' on lr 'a^-Od Walter Foeman City Clerk 39 0Q-1046 flt=fm-[gf/g]+gdiff[1/{1+Plt(E12-1)}] +[gu/91[1/(l+Plt(Ell-1)],(min=fmin:max=1.0) or flt=[fm+0.91(N-1)]/N** flt Primary For special case of single -lane approach opposed by multilane approach, see text. * If P1>=1 for shared left -turn lanes with N>l, then assume de -facto left -turn lane and redo calculations. *# For permitted left -turns with multiple exclusive left -turn lanes, flt=fm. For special case of multilane approach opposed by single -lane approach or when gf>gq, see text. SUPPLEMENTAL UNIFORM DELAY WORKSHEET Adj. LT Vol from Vol Adjustment Worksheet, v v/c ratio from Capacity Worksheet, X Primary phase effective green, g Secondary phase effective green, gq (From Supplemental Permitted IT Worksheet), gu Cycle length, C 115.0 Red=(C-g-gq-gu), r Arrivals: v/(3600(max (X,1.0))), qa Primary ph. departures.: s/3600, sp Secondary ph. departures: s(gq+gu)/(gu*3600), ss XPerm XProt XCase Queue at begining of green arrow, Qa Queue at beginning of unsaturated green, Qu Residual queue, Qr Uniform Delay, dl EBLT WELT NBLT SBLT DELAY/LOS WORKSHEET WITH INITIAL QUEUE Initial Dur: Uniform Delay Initial Final Initial Lane Appr/ Unmet Unmet Queue Unmet Queue Group Lane Demand Demand Unadj. Adj. Param. Demand Delay Delay Group Q veh t hrs. ds dl sec u Q veh d3 sec d sec Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Intersection Delay 107.6 sec/veh Intersection LOS F Submitted into the public ® recor yin ,connection with item %�L7 on PROJECT.doc Walter Foeman City Clerk 00-- HC 0 0 HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 3.1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS ® Analyst: J. AHLSTEDT Intersection: SW 4TH AVE AND 15TH RD Count Date: FUTURE W/PROJECT Time Period: PM PK Intersection Orientation: East-West Major St. Vehicle Volume Data: Movements: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Volume: 2 52 10 39 178 22 5 8 23 199 133 9 HFR: 4 83 13 70 191 35 12 14 33 262 153 18 PHF: 0.50 0.63 0.75 0.56 0.93 0.63 0.42 0.58 0.69 0.76 0.87 0.50 PHV: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Pedestrian Volume Data: Movements: Flow: Lane width: Walk speed: % Blockage: Median Type: Raised Curb # of vehicles: 0 Flared approach Movements: # of vehicles: Northbound 0 # of vehicles: Southbound 0 ® Lane usage for movements 1,2&3 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R --------------------------------------------------------------------- Y Y N N Y Y N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 4,5&6 approach Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Y Y N N Y Y N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 7,8&9 approach Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Y Y Y N N N N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 10,11&12 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Y Y Y N N N N N N Channelized: N Submitted into the public Grade: 0.00 reco" In Connection Ith item` on �� V Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles: Walter Foeman PROJECT.doe City Cleric 41 —ic136 0 ---------------------------------------------- Shared In volume, major th vehicles: Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: Sat. flow rate, major rt vehicles: Number of major street through lanes: Length of study period, hrs: 1.00 • ----------------------- --------- Eastbound Westbound 26 89 0 0 1700 0 1700 1700 2 2 Worksheet 4 Critical Gap and Follow-up time calculation Critical Gap Calculations: Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 t c,base 4.1 4.1 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 t c,hv 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 P by 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t c,g 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 G 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t 3,1t 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 t c,T: 1 stage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t c 1 stage 4.1 4.1 7.5 6.5 619 7.5 Follow Up Time Calculations: Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 --------------------------------------------------------- t f,base 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 t f,HV 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 P by 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t f 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3,3 3.5 --------------------------------------------------------- Worksheet 6 Impedance and capacity equations Step 1: RT from Minor St. 9 --------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows 48 Potential Capacity 1017 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 Movement Capacity 1017 Probability of Queue free St. 0.97 --------------------------------------------------------- Step 2: LT from Major St. 4 Conflicting Flows 96 Potential Capacity 1510 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 Movement Capacity 1510 Probability of Queue free St. 0.95 Maj. L Shared In. Prob. Queue Free St. ---------------------------------------------------- 1.00 Step 3: TH from Minor St. 8 ---------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows 463 Potential Capacity 499 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 1.00 Movement Capacity 498 Probability of Queue free St. ---------------------------------------------------- 0.97 Step 4: LT from Minor St. ------------------------------------------- . Worksheet 8 Shared Lane Calculations PROJECT.doc 11 12 6.5 6.9 2.0 2.0 0.00 0.00 0.2 0.1 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 . 6.5 6.9 11 12 -------- 4.0 3.3 1.0 1.0 0.00 0.00 4.0 3.3 12 113 925 1.00 925 0.98 1 226 1354 1.00 1354 1.00 1,00 11 452 506 1.00 1.00 505 0.70 --------- Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity ------------------------------------------- --------- . Worksheet 8 Shared Lane Calculations PROJECT.doc 11 12 6.5 6.9 2.0 2.0 0.00 0.00 0.2 0.1 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 . 6.5 6.9 11 12 -------- 4.0 3.3 1.0 1.0 0.00 0.00 4.0 3.3 12 113 925 1.00 925 0.98 1 226 1354 1.00 1354 1.00 1,00 11 452 506 1.00 1.00 505 0.70 7 10 --------------------------------------- 409 404 532 536 1.00 1.00 0.69 0.97 0.76 0.98 0.75 0.94 398 506 --------------------------------------- Submitted into the public record in connection with item on G -o a Walter Foeman City Clerk0 42 42 • U • 0 • Shared Lane Calculations Movement -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 7 I-------------------II-------------------I 8 9 10 11 12 v(vph) I 112 14 33 II II 262 I I 153 18 Movement Capacity 398 498 1017 506 505 925 Shared Lane Capacity -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 653 515 Worksheet 10 delay,queue length, and LOS Movement 1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4 7 I-------------------II-------------------I 8 9 10 11 12 v(vph) 4 70 I I 59 II II 433 I I C m(vph) 1354 1510 653 515 V/c 0.00 0.05 0.09 0.84 95% queue length Control Delay 7.7 7.5 11.1 44.9 LOS A A B E Approach Delay 11.1 44.9 Approach LOS -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- B E Worksheet 11 Shared Major LT Impedance and Delay Rank 1 Delay Calculations Movement 2 5 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- P of 1.00 0.95 V it 26 89 V i2 0 0 S it 1700 0 S i2 1700 1700 P* 0j 1.00 1.00 D maj left 7.7 7.5 N number major st lanes 2 2 Delay, rank -l-mymts----------------------0_0----0_0 ---------- - ----------------------- Submitted into the public record in connection with item 4=-� on Ll_/� PROJECT.doc Walter FOeman City Clerk Ou-luau 43 0 • • Jackson M. Ahlstedt Jackson M. Ahlstedt, P.E. Jackson M. Ahlstedt, P.E. 46 N.W. 94th Street Miami Shores, Florida 33150 Phone: (305) 754-6695 E-Mail: HCS: Signals Release 3.1 Fax: (305) 754-8695 OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Intersection: 15TH RD AND SW 1ST AVE City/State: MIAMI/FLA Analyst: J. AHLSTEDT Project No: PARK PLACE Time Period Analyzed: FUTURE W/PROJECT PM PK HR Date: 4/8/00 East/West Street Name: 15TH ROAD North/South Street Name: SW 1ST AVENUE VOLUME Eastbound ( Westbound i L T R I L T R I Volume 17 441 I 1 221 12 PHF 10.30 0.90 1 0.80 0.69 PK 15 Vol 16 123 1 69 4 Hi Ln Vol 1 i % Grade 1 0 1 0 Ideal Sat 1 1900 i 1900 ParkExist { 1 NumPark 1 1 % Heavy Veh{0 0 { 0 0 No. Lanes 1 0 2 0 1 0 2 0 LGConfig I IT 1 TR Lane Width 1 12.0 1 12.0 RTOR Vol 1 1 0 Adj Flow 1 513 1 293 %InSharedLnl Prop Turns 10.04 1 0.06 NumPeds 1 1 0 NumBus 1 0 1 0 Northbound ( Southbound L T R I L T R 1208 54 10.95 0.82 155 16 I I 0 I 1900 I I 10 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 LR { 12.0 I 0 285 I 10.77 0.23 0 1 0 1 0 Duration 1.00 Area Type: All other areas OPERATING PARAMETERS 1 Eastbound { Westbound 1 Northbound 1 Southbound 1 i L T R { L T R 1 L T R I L T R { Init Unmet { 0.0 1 0.0 I 1 0.0 Arriv. Typal 3 I 3 1 I 3 I Unit Ext. 1 3.0 { 3.0 1 { 3.0 1 I Factor ( 1.000 { 1.000 { ( 1.000 Lost Time 1 2.0 1 2.0 1 I 2.0 1 Ext of g 1 2.0 { 2.0 1 I 2.0 1 Ped Min g 1 0.0 { 0.0 { { 0.0 { PHASE DATA Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 SSubmitied into the Public EB Left A i NB Left recorA in connection with Thru A { Thru item Right 1 Right on JJ.--W Peds { Ped Walter Foeman PROJECT.doc City Clerk 44 '10 3 6 U WB Left Thru A Right A Peds NB Right SB Right Green 42.0 Yellow 4.0 Al 1 Red 1.0 Cycle Length: 60.0 Appr./ Mvt Movement Volume PHF SB Left A Thru Right A Ped EB Right I I WB Right I I 8.0 4.0 1.0 secs _VOLUME ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET Adjusted Prop. Prop. Flow No. Lane Flow Rate Left Right Rate Lanes Group RTOR In Lane Grp Turns Turns Eastbound Left 7 0.30 23 0 Thru 441 0.90 490 2 LT 513 0.04 Right 0 Westbound Left 0 Thru 221 0.80 276 2 TR 293 0.06 Right 12 0.69 17 0 0 Northbound Left 0 ThruRight 0 Right ® 0 Southbound Left 208 0.95 219 0 Thru 0 LR 285 0.77 0.23 Right 54 0.82 66 0 0 # Value entered by user. SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORKsHEEr Appr/ Ideal Lane Sat f f f f f Adj f f f f Sat Group Flow W HV G P BB A LU RT LT Flow Eastbound Sec LT Adj/LT Sat: LT 1900 1 0 00 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 0.95 1 000 0 937 3383 V Westbound Sec LT Adj/LT Sat: TR 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 .1.00 0.95 0.991 1.000 Northbound Sec LT Adj/LT Sat: ® Southbound LR 1900 1.000 Sec LT 1.000 Adj/LT Sat: 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 1.00 0.869 0.963 PROJECT.doc QCtr c �U 3579 e o o co 1590 ri 45 �� 0 b • Appri Lane Mvmt Group • • CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORRSHEET Adj Adj Sat Flow Green --Lane Group -- Flow Rate Flow Rate Ratio Ratio Capacity vic (v) (s) (vis) (S/C) (c) Ratio eastbound - Pri. Sec. Left Thru LT 513 3383 0.15 0.700 2368 0.22 Right Westbound Pri. Sec. Left Thru TR 293 3579 0.08 0.700 2505 0.12 Right Northbound Pri. Sec. Left Thru Right Southbound Pri. Sec. Left Thru LR 285 1590 0.18 0.000 0 0.00 Right Sum (vis) critical = 0.00 Lost Time/Cycle, L = 0.00 sec Critical Vic(X) = 0.00 LEVEL OF SERVICE WORRSHEET Appri Ratios Unf Prog Lane Incremental Res Lane Group Approach Lane Del Adj Grp Factor Del Del Grp vic g./C dl Fact Cap k d2 d3 Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound LT 0.22 0.700 3.2 1.000 2368 0.11 0.0 0.0 3.2 A 3.2 A Westbound TR 0.12 0.700 2.9 1.000 2505 0.11 0.0 0.0 3.0 A 3.0 A Northbound Submitted into the public recolg in connection MA, A item _ on1LL(' southbound Walter Foeman LR 0.00 0.000 30.0 1.000 0 0.11 0.0 0.0 30.0 �'"@i�� � City Clerk Intersection Delay = 10.2 (seciveh) Intersection.LOS = B SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED LT WORRSHEET for exclusive lefts PROJECT.doc 46 00-1036 • APPROACH EB Cycle Length, C 60.0 sec Actual Green Time for Lane Group, G Effective Green Time for Lane Group, g Opposing Effective Green Time, go Number of Lanes in Lane Group, N Number of Opposing Lanes, No Adjusted Left -Turn Flow Rate, Vlt Proportion of Left Turns in Opposing Flow, Plto Adjusted Opposing Flow Rate, Vo Lost Time for Lane Group, tl Left Turns per Cycle: LTC-V1tC/3600 Opposing Flow per Lane, Per Cycle: Volc=VoC/3600fluo Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo (Table 9-2 or Eqn 9-7) gf=[Gexp(- a * (LTC ** b))]-tl, gf<=g Opposing Queue Ratio: qro=1-Rpo(go/C) gq=(4.943Volc**0.762)[(gro**1.061)-tl], gq<=g gu =g-gq if gq>=gf, =g-gf if gq<gf n=(gq-gf)/2, n>=0 Ptho=l-Plto P1*=Plt[l+{(N-1)g/(gf+gu/Ell+4.24))) Ell (Figure 9-7) E12=(17Ptho**n)/Plto, E12>=1.0 fmin=2(1+Plt)/g or fmin=2(1+P1)/g gdiff=max(gq-gf,0) fm=[gf/g]+[gu/g][1/{1+P1(Ell-1))], (min=fmin;max=1.00) flt=fm=[gf/g]+gdiff[1/{1+Plt(E12-1))] WB NB SB +[gu/g][1/(I+Plt(Ell-1)],(min=fmin;max=1.0) or flt=[fm+0.91(N-1)]/N** fit For special case of single -lane approach opposed by multilane approach, see text. * If P1>=1 for shared left -turn lanes with 1111, then assume de -facto left -turn lane and redo calculations. ** For permitted left -turns with multiple exclusive left -turn • lanes, flt=fm. For special case of multilane approach opposed by single -lane approach or when gf>gq, see text. SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED LT WORKSHEET for shared lefts - APPROACH EB WB NB SB Cycle Length, C 60.0 sec Actual Green Time for Lane Group, G 42.0 Effective Green Time for Lane Group, g 42.00 Opposing Effective Green Time, go 42.0 Number of Lanes in Lane Group, N 2 Number of Opposing Lanes, No 2 Adjusted Left -Turn Flow Rate, Vlt 23 Proportion of Left Turns in Lane Group, Pit 0.04 Proportion of Left Turns in Opposing Flow, Plto 0.00 Adjusted Opposing Flow Rate, Vo 293 Lost Time for Lane Group, tl 4.00 Left Turns per Cycle: LTC=V1tC/3600 0.33 Opposing Flow per Lane, Per Cycle: Volc=VoC/3600fluo 2.57 Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo (Table 9-2 or Eqn 9-7) 1.00 gf=[Gexp(- a * (LTC ** b))]-tl, gf.<=g 23.0 Opposing Queue Ratio: qro=1-Rpo(go/C) 0.30 gq=(4.943Volc**0.762)[(gro**1.061)-tl], gq<-g 0.00 Su =g-gq if gq>=gf, =g-gf if gq<gf 19.04 Submitted into the n=(gq-gf)/2, n>=0 0.00 p u b-ic Ptho=1-Plto P1*=Plt [ 1+{ (N-1)g/(gf+gu/El 1+4.24)) ) 1.00 0.10 recor -n, Uconnect-® w-th Item L Ell (Figure 9-7) 1.90 on E12=(1-Ptho**n)/Plto, E12>=1.0 1.00 Walter Foeman fmin=2(1+Plt)/g or fmin-2(1+P1)/g 0.05 CI Clerk 0.00 fm=[gf/g]+[gu/g][1/{1+P1(Ell-1))], (min=fmin;max=1.00) 0.96 PROJECT.doc 47 flt=fm=[gf/g]+gdiff[l/{1+Plt(E12-1)}] +[gu/g][l/(1+Plt(Ell-1)],(min=fmin;max=1.0) or flt=[fm+0.91(N-1)]/N}# flt Primary 0.937 For special case of single -lane approach opposed by multilane approach, see text. * If P1>=1 for shared left -turn lanes with N>l, then assume de -facto left -turn lane and redo calculations. f� For permitted left -turns with multiple exclusive left -turn lanes, flt=£m. For special case of multilane approach opposed by single -lane approach or when gf>gq, see text. SUPPLEMENTAL UNIFORM DELAY WORKSHEET EBLT WBLT NBLT SBLT Adj. IT Vol from Vol Adjustment Worksheet, v v/c ratio from Capacity Worksheet, X Primary phase effective green, g Secondary phase effective green, gq (From Supplemental Permitted LT Worksheet), gu Cycle length, C 60.0 Red=(C-g-gq-gu), r Arrivals: v/(3600(max(X,1.0))), qa Primary ph. departures: s/3600, sp Secondary ph. departures: s(gq+gu)/(gu*3600), ss XPerm XProt XCase Queue at begining of green arrow, Qa Queue at beginning of unsaturated green, Qu Residual queue, Qr Uniform Delay, dl DELAY/LOS WORKSHEET WITH INITIAL QUEUE Initial Dur. Uniform Delay Initial Final Initial Lane Appr/ Unmet Unmet Queue Unmet Queue Group Lane Demand Demand Unadj. Adj. Param. Demand Delay 'Delay Group Q veh t hrs. ds dl sec u Q veh d3 sec d sec Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Intersection Delay 10.2 sec/veh Intersection LOS B Submitted into the public 0 record in connection with PROJECT.doc item on .%�—_% L IB Walter Foeman City Cled< 48 • • • • Jackson M. Ahlstedt Jackson M. Ahlstedt, P'.E. Jackson M. Ahlstedt, P.E. 46 N.W. 94th Street Miami Shores, Florida 33150 Phone: (305) 754-6695 E-Mail: HCS: Signals Release 3.1 Fax: (305) 754-8695 OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Intersection: SE 1571H RD AND MIAMI AVE City/State: MIAMI/FLA Analyst: J. AHLSTEDT Project No: PARK PLACE Time Period Analyzed: FUTURE W/PROJECT PM PK HR Date: 6/5/00 East/West Street Name: SE 15TH ROAD North/South Street Name: S. MIAMI AVENUE VOLUME DATA I Eastbound I Westbound ! Northbound I Southbound I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R f I ! I Volume 1124 289 247 177 139 67 189 145 65 128 265 19 PHF 10.50 0.81 0.86 10.82 0.93 0.46 10.81 0.87 0.73 10.63 0.70 0.61 PK 15 Vol 162 89 72 123 37 36 127 42 22 Ill 95 8 Hi Ln Vol I I I I % Grade 1 0 1 0 1 0 I 0 Ideal Sat 1 1900 1 1900 1 1900 1 1900 ParkExist I I i I NumPark % Heavy Veh10 0 0 10 0 0 10 0 0 10 0 0 No. Lanes 1 0 2 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 2 0 LGConfig I LTR I LTR I LTR I LTR Lane Width 1 12.0 1 12.0 1 12.0 1 12.0 RTOR Vol 1 160 1 0 1 0 1 0 Adj Flow 1 706 1 389 1 366 1 454 %InSharedLnI I ! I Prop Turns 10.35 0.14 10.24 0.38 10.30 0.24 10.10 0.07 NumPeds 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 NumBus 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 Duration 1.00 Area Type: All other areas Eastbound L T R Init Unmet I . 0.0 Arriv. Type1 3 Unit Ext. I 3.0 I Factor ( 1.000 Lost Time 1 2.0 Ext of g 1 2.0 Ped Min g 1 0.0 Phase Combination 1 EB Left A ® Thru A Right A Pods PROJECT.doc OPERATING PARAMETERS Westbound i Northbound L T R I L T R 0.0 I 1 0.0 3 i 3 3.0' ! 3.0 1.000 1 1.000 2.0 I 2.0 2.0 1 2.0 0.0 1 0.0 PHASE DATA Southbound L T R 0.0 3 3.0 1.000 2.0 2.0 0.0 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 1 NB Left Submitted into the public Thru AD Cord in Right dht item Connection with on Walter Foeman Citk` Clerk 49 06-I636 �10 WB Left A Thru A ® Right A Peds NB Right SB Right Green 9.0 Yellow 4.0 All Red 1.0 Cycle Length: 60.0 SB Left A Thru A Right A Ped EB Right I WB Right I i 41.0 4.0 1.0 secs VOLUME ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET Adjusted Prop. Prop. Appr.i Mvt Movement Volume PHF Flow No. Lane Flow Rate Left Right Rate Lanes Group RTOR In Lane Grp Turns Turns Eastbound Left 124 0.50 248 0 Thru 289 0.81 357 2 LTR 706 0.35 0.14 Right 247 0.86 101 0 160 Westbound Left 77 0.62 94 0 Thru 139 0.93 149 2 LTR 389 0.24 0.38 Right 67 0.46 146 0 .0 Northbound Left 89 0.81 110 0 Thru 145 0.87 167 2 LTR 366 0.30 0.24 Right 65 0.73 89 0 0 Southbound Left 28 0.63 44 0 Thru 265 0.70 379 2 LTR 454 0.10 0.07 Right 19 0.61 31 0 0 Value entered by user. SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET Appri Ideal Adj Lane Sat f f f f f f f f- f Sat Group Flow W HV G P BB A LU RT LT Flow Eastbound Sec LT Adj/LT Sat: LTR 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 0.95 0.979 0.653 2307�9 - �C Westbound Sec IT Ad j /LT Sat: O `I p r LO L U LTR 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 0.95 0.944 0.650 221�4, 5 ---- b O cef 3.1 Northbound Sec LT Adj/LT Sat: 0 LTR 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 0.95 0.964 0.748 2603 l Southbound Sec LT Adj/LT Sat: a.i U E ---- LTR 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 0.95 0.990 0.899 3210 PROJECT.doc 50 • 0 CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEET • Adj Adj Sat Flow Green --Lane Group-- Appr/ Lane Flow Rate Flow Rate Ratio Ratio Capacity v/c Mvmt Group (v) (s) (v/s) (g/C) (c) Ratio Eastbound Pri. Sec. Left Thru LTR 706 2307 # 0.31 0.150 346 2.04 Right Westbound Pri. Sec. Left Thru LTR 389 2214 0.18 0.150 332 1.17 Right Northbound Pri. Sec. Left Thru LTR 366 2603 0.14 0.683 1779 0.21 Right Southbound Pri. Sec. Left Thru LTR 454 3210 # 0.14 0.683 2194 0.21 Right Sum (v/s) critical = 0.45 Lost Time/Cycle, L = 8.00 sec Critical v/c(X) = 0.54 LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEET Appr/ Ratios Unf Prog Lane Incremental Res Lane Group Approach Lane Del Adj Grp Factor Del Del Grp v/c g/C dl Fact Cap k d2 d3 Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound LTR 2.04 0.150 25.5 1.000 346 0.50 0.0 Westbound - LTR 1.17 0.150 25.5 1.000 332 0.50 342.4 0.0 367.9 F 367.9 F Northbound I E U LTR 0.21 0.683 3.5 1.000 1779 0.11 0.1 0.0 3.6 A 3.6 A p LL0 tea.. �U Southbound O Co C eO e_ O LTR 0.21 0.683 3.5 1.000 2194 0.11 0.0 0.0 3.6 A 3.6 A v T Intersection Delay = 120.8 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = F 'd 5Q. E SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED LT WORKSHEET for exclusive lefts PROJECT. doc 51 a APPROACH Cycle Length, C 60.0 sec Actual Green Time for Lane Group, G Effective Green Time for Lane Group, g Opposing Effective Green Time, go Number of Lanes in Lane Group, N Number of Opposing Lanes, No Adjusted Left -Turn Flow Rate, Vlt Proportion of Left Turns in Opposing Flow, Plto Adjusted Opposing Flow Rate, Vo Lost Time for Lane Group, tl Left Turns per Cycle: LTC=V1tC/3600 Opposing Flow per Lane, Per Cycle: Volc=VoC/3600fluo Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo (Table 9-2 or Eqn 9-7) gf=[Gexp(- a * (LTC ** b))]-tl, gf<=g Opposing Queue Ratio: qro=1-Rpo(go/C) gq-(4.943Volc**0.762)[(gro**1.061)-tl], gq<=g gu =g-gq if gq>=gf, =g-gf if gq<gf n-(gq-gf)/2, n>=0 Ptho=l-Plto P1*=Plt[l+{(N-1)9/(gf+gu/Ell+4.24))) Ell (Figure 9-7) E12=(1-Ptho**n)/Plto, E12>=1.0 fmin=2(1+Plt)/g or fmin=2(1+P1)/g gdiff=max(gq-gf,0) fm=[gf/g]+[gu/9][1/{l+Pl(Ell-1)}], (min=fmin;max=1.00) flt=fm=[gf/g]+gdiff[l/{1+Plt(E12-1)}] 0 EB WB NB SB +[gu/g][1/(l+Plt(E11-1)],(min=fmin;max=1.0) or flt=[fm+0.91(N-1)]/N** fit For special case of single -lane approach opposed by multilane approach, see text. { If P1>=1 for shared left -turn lanes with N>l, then assume de -facto ® left -turn lane and redo calculations. ** For permitted left -turns with multiple exclusive left -turn lanes, flt=fm. For special case of multilane approach opposed by single -lane approach or when gf>gq, see text. SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED LT WORKSHEET for shared lefts APPROACH Cycle Length, C 60.0 sec Actual Green Time for Lane Group, G Effective Green Time for Lane Group, g Opposing Effective Green Time, go Number of Lanes in Lane Group, N Number of Opposing Lanes, No Adjusted Left -Turn Flow Rate, Vlt Proportion of Left Turns in Lane Group, Pit Proportion of Left Turns in Opposing Flow, Pita Adjusted Opposing Flow Rate, Vo Lost Time for Lane Group, tl Left Turns per Cycle: LTC=V1tC/3600 Opposing. Flow per Lane, Per Cycle: Volc=VoC/3600fluo Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo (Table 9-2 or Eqn 9-7) gf=[Gexp(- a * (LTC ** b))]-tl, gf<=g Opposing Queue Ratio: qro=1-Rpo(go/C) gq=(4.943Volc**0.762)[(gro-*1.061)-tl], gq<=g gu =g-gq if gq>=gf, =g-gf if gq<gf n=(gq-gf)/2, n>=0 Ptho=1-Plto P1*=Plt[l+{(N-1)9/(gf+gu/E11+4.24))) Ell (Figure 9-7) E12=(1-Ptho**n)/Plto, E12>=1.0 fmin=2(1+Plt)/g or fmin=2(1+P1)/g gdiff=max(gq-gf,0) fm=[gf/g]+[gu/91[1/{1+P1(E11-1)1], (min=fmin;max=1.00) PROJECT. doc EB WB NB SB 9.0 9.0 41.0 41.0 9.00 9.00 41.00 41.00 9.0 9.0 41.0 41.0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 248 94 110 44 V a C 0.35 0.24 0.30 0. 10 -M �- cif 0.24 0.35 0.10 0.30 l 389 706 454 366 g e U 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 (D •® ` L 4.13 1.57 1.83 0.73E v ` U 3.41 6.19 3.98 3.21 a C C co 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0 0.0 0.0 6.5 16.2- CJ rq 0.85 0.85 0.32 0.A 2.55 9.00 0.00 O.od_D 6.45 0.00 34.50 24.S 1.27 4.50. 0.00 0.0 . 0.76 0.65 0.90 0.70,E t� 0.78 0.75 0.77 0.22) 2.10 2.92. 2.25 2.05 1.23 2.44 1.00 1.00 0.40 0.39 0.09 0.06 2.55 9.00 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.39 0.59 0.89 52 00-036 flt-fm=[gf/g]+gdiff[l/{l+Plt(E12-1)}] +[gu/g][1/(1+Plt(Ell-1)),(min=fmin;max=1.0) or flt=[fm+0.91(N-1)]/N¢- flt Primary 0.653 0.650 0.746 0.899 For special case of single -lane approach opposed by multilane approach, see text. +� If Pl>=l for shared left -turn lanes with N>l, then assume de -facto left -turn lane and redo calculations. *# For permitted left -turns with multiple exclusive left -turn lanes, flt=fm. For special case of multilane approach opposed by single -lane approach or when gf>gq, see text. SUPPLEMENTAL UNIFORM DELAY WORKSHEET EBLT WBLT NBLT SBLT Adj. IT Vol from Vol Adjustment Worksheet, v v/c ratio from Capacity Worksheet, X Primary phase effective green, g Secondary phase effective green, gq (From Supplemental Permitted IT Worksheet), gu Cycle length, C 60.0 Red=(C-g-gq-gu), r Arrivals: v/(3600(max(X,1.0))), qa Primary ph. departures: s/3600, sp Secondary ph. departures: s(gq+gu)/(gu*3600), ss XPerm XProt XCase Queue at begining of green arrow, Qa Queue at beginning of unsaturated green, Qu Residual queue, Qr Uniform Delay, dl DELAY/LOS WORKSHEET WITH INITIAL QUEUE Initial Dur. Uniform Delay Initial Final Initial Lane Appr/ Unmet Unmet Queue Unmet Queue Group Lane Demand Demand Unadj. Adj. Param. Demand Delay Delay Group Q veh t hrs. ds dl sec u Q veh d3 sec d sec Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Intersection Delay 120.8 sec/veh Intersection LOS F Submitted into the public ® record in connection with item on Zl. iLw PROJECT.doc Walter Foeman 53 City Cleric 00-1036 E • Jackson M. Ahlstedt Jackson M. Ahlstedt, P.E. Jackson M. Ahlstedt, P.E. 46 N.W. 94th Street Miami Shores, Florida 33150 Phone: (305) 754-8695 E-Mail: Intersection: City/State: Analyst: Project No: Time Period Analyzed: Date: East/West Street Name: North/South Street Name: HCS: Signals Release 3.1 Fax: (305) 754-8695 OPERATIONAL ANAL SE 15TH RD AND BRICKELL MIAMI/FLA J. AHLSTEDT PARK PLACE FUTURE W/PROJECT PM PEAK 6i5i00 SE 5TH ROAD BRICKELL AVENUE VOLUME DATA I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound ( Southbound 1 i L T R I L T R 1 L T R 1 L T R 1 i I I I I Volume 158 63 138 1154 77 30 184 735 187 136. 1873 96 1 PHF 10.78 0.75 0.85 10.83 0.68 0.48 10.87 0.92 0.71 10.75 0.96 0.68 1 PK 15 Vol 119 21 41 146 28 16 124 200 66 112 488 35 1 Hi Ln Vol I I I I I % Grade 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 Ideal Sat 1 1900 11900 1900 11900 1900 11900 1900 1 ParkExist I I I I I Hak I 1 ( I % 1 Heavy Veh10 0 0 10 0 0 10 0 0 10 0 0 y No. Lanes 1 0 2 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 LGConfig I LTR I DefL TR I L TR I L TR I Lane Width 1 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 1 RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 D 1 Adj Flow 1 320 1186 176 197 1062 148 2092, 1 %InSharedLn1 I I I I Prop Turns 10.23 0.51 10.00 0.36 1 0.25 1 0.07 1 NumPeds 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 NumBus 1 0 10 0 10 0 10 0 1 Duration 1.00 Area Type: All other areas OPERATING PARAMETERS I Eastbound I Westbound 1 Northbound 1 Southbound I 1 L T R I L T R 1 L T R 1 L T R 1 I I I I I Init Unmet 1 0.0 10.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 1 Arriv.'Type1 3 13 3 13 3 13 3 1 Unit Ext. 1 3.0 13.0 3.0 13.0 3.0 13.0 3.0 1 I Factor 1 1.000 1 1.000 1 1.000 1 1.000 1 Lost Time 1 2.0 12.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 1 Ext of g 1 2.0 12.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 1 Ped Min g 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 PHASE DATA 7 Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 Sub6i itteq into 'the 1 NB Left A reCor in p1cWith bliC EB Left A C®nCl('Cti�Dn with • Thru A 1 Thru A item L Right A 1 Right A o� �'r�� Peds 1 Ped Waiter 1=oeman PROJECT.doc Cltj/ CfQrt( 54 no-� 0 WB Left A Thru A Right A Peds NB Right SB Right Green 23.0 Yellow 4.0 All Red 1.0 Cycle Length: 115.0 SB Left A I Thru A Right A Ped EB Right I I WB Right I I 32.0 4.0 1.0 secs _VOLUME ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET Adjusted Prop. Prop. Appr.i Mvt Flow No. Lane Flow Rate Left Right Movement Volume PHF Rate Lanes Group RTOR In Lane Grp Turns Turns Eastbound Left 58 0.78 74 0 Thru 63 0.75 84 2 LTR 320 0.23 0.51 Right 138 0.85 162 0 0 Westbound Left 154 0.83 186 0 DefL 186 Thru 77 0.68 113 2 TR 176 0.00 0.36 Right 30 0.48 63 0 0 Northbound Left 84 0.87 97 1 L 97 Thru 735 0.92 799 2 TR 1062 0.25 Right 187 0.71 263 0 0 Southbound Left 36 0.75 48 1 'L 48 Thru 1873 0.96 1951 2 TR 2092 0.07 Right 96 0.68 141 0 0 + Value entered by user. SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEEI' Appri Ideal Adj Lane Sat f f f f f f f f_ f Sat Group Flow W HV G P BB A LU RT LT Flow -V D ` C CU Eastbound Sec LT Adj/LT Sat: N C� LTR 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 0.95 0.924 0_826 2755 -O LE Z 1 Westbound Sec IT Adj/LT Sat: DefL 1900 1.000 1.000 1.00 ---- TR 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 1.00 0.946 1.000 Northbound Sec IT Adj/LT Sat: L 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 1.00 ---- TR 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 0.95 0.963 1.000 C C Ca o o� 1798,0 V a c �� O \ 3470 Q) Southbound Sec IT Adj/LT Sat: . L 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 1.00 ---- 0.234 444 TR 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 0.95 0.990 1.000 3574 PROJECT.doc 55 O0-�U3� CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Appri Lane Adj Flow Rate Adj Sat Flow Flow Rate Ratio Green Ratio --Lane Group-- Capacity vic Mvmt Group (v) (s) (vis) (g/c) (c) Ratio Eastbound Pri. Sec. Left Thru LTR 320 2755 0.12 0.200 551 0.58 Right Westbound Pri. Sec. Left Deft 186 0.000 Thru TR 176 1798 0.10 0.200 360 0.49 Right Northbound Pri. Sec. Left L 97 0.713 Thru TR 1062 3476 0.31 0.713 2479 0.43 Right Southbound Pri. Sec. Left L 48 444 0.11 0.713 317 0.15 Thru TR 2092 3574 0.59 0.713 2548 0.82 Right Lost Time/Cycle, L = 0.00 Sum (vis) critical = 0.00 sec Critical Vic(X) = 0.00 LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEET Appri Ratios Unf Prog Lane Incremental Res Lane Group Approach Lane Del Adj Grp Factor Del Del Grp vic g/C dl Fact Cap k d2 d3 Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound LTR 0.58 0.200 41.6 1.000 551 0.17 1.6 0.0 43.2 D 43.2 D Westbound D efL 0.000 1.000 0.0 TR 0.49 0.200 40.8 1.000 360 0.11 1.1 0.0 41.8 D 41.8 D -0 = C Ca Q cc: (y Northbound N .p 1 LL ,CN L 0.713 1.000 0.0 U TR 0.43 0.713 6.8 1.000 2479 0.11 0.1 0.0 6.9 A 6.9 A p C: C C: 0� 0 Southbound V a L 0.15 0.713 5.3 1.000 317 0.11 0.2 0.0 5.5 A TR 0.82 0.713 11.4 1.000 2548 0.36 2.3 0.0 13.7 B 13.6 B Intersection Delay = 15.6 (seciveh) Intersection LOS = B LQ) ag SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED LT WORKSHEET for exclusive lefts PROJECT. doc 56 ��- U36 APPROACH EB WB NB SB Cycle Length, C 115.0 sec Actual Green Time for Lane Group, G 0.0 62.0 82.0 Effective Green Time for Lane Group, g 23.00 82.00 82.00 Opposing Effective Green Time, go 23.0 82.0 82.0 Number of Lanes in Lane Group, N 1 1 1 Number of Opposing Lanes, No 2 2 2 Adjusted Left -Turn Flow Rate, Vlt 186 97 48 Proportion of Left Turns in Opposing Flow, Plto 0.23 0.00 0.00 Adjusted Opposing Flow Rate, Vo 320 2092 1062 Lost Time for Lane Group, tl 0.00 4.00 4.00 Left Turns per Cycle: LTC=V1tC/3600 5.94 3.10 1.53 Opposing Flow per Lane, Per Cycle: Volc=VoC/3600fluo 5.38 35.17 17.86 Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo (Table 9-2 or Eqn 9-7) 1.00 1.00 1.00 gf=[Gexp(- a * (LTC ** b))]-tl, gf<=g 0.01 0.0 0.0 Opposing Queue Ratio: qro=1-Rpo(go/C) 0.80 0.29 0.29 gq=(4.943Volc**0.762)[(gro**1.061)-tl], gq<-g 5.50 47.98 10.86 gu =g-gq if gq>=gf, =g-gf if gq<gf 17.50 . 71.14 n=(gq-gf)/2, n>=0 2.75 23.99 5.4343 Ptho=l-Plto 0.77 1.00 1.00 P1*=Plt[l+{(N-1)g/(gf+gu/Ell+4.24))) 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ell (Figure 9=7) 1.79 10.60 3.71 E12=(1-Ptho**n)/Plto, E12>=1.0 2.23 1.00 1.00 fmin=2(1+Plt)/g or fmin=2(1+P1)/g 0.17 0.05 0.05 gdiff=max(gq-gf,0) 5.50 0.00 0.00 fm=[gf/g]+[gu/9][1/{1+P1(E11-1)1], (min=fmin;max=1.00) 0.42 0.05 0.23 flt=fm=[gf/g]+gdiff[l/{l+Plt(E12-1)1] . +[gu/91[1/(l+Plt(Ell-1)),(min=fmin;max=1.0) or flt=[fm+0.91(N-1)]/N** fit 0.234 For special case of single -lane approach opposed by multilane approach, see text. * If P1>=1 for shared left -turn lanes with N>l, then assume de -facto left -turn lane and redo calculations. ** For permitted left -turns with multiple exclusive left -turn lanes, flt=fm. For special case of multilane approach opposed by single -lane approach or when gf>gq, see text. SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED LT WORKSHEET for shared.lefts APPROACH EB WB NB SB Cycle Length, C 115.0 sec Actual Green Time for Lane Group, G 23.0 Effective Green Time for Lane Group, g 23.00 Opposing Effective Green Time, go 23.0 Number of Lanes in Lane Group, N 2 Number of Opposing Lanes, No 2 Adjusted Left -Turn Flow Rate, Vlt 74 Proportion of Left Turns in Lane Group, Pit 0.23 Proportion of Left Turns in Opposing Flow, Plto 0.00 Adjusted Opposing Flow Rate, Vo 176 Lost Time for Lane Group, tl 4.00 Left Turns per Cycle: LTC=V1tC/3600 2.36 Opposing Flow per Lane, Per Cycle: Volc=VoC/3600fluo 2.81 Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo (Table 9-2 or Eqn 9-7) 1.00 gf=[Gexp(- a * (LTC ** b))]-tl, gf<=g 0.5 Opposing Queue Ratio: qro=1-Rpo(go/C) gq=(4.943Volc**0.762)[(gro**1.061)-ti], 0.80 u iid gq<-g 0.73 into the p gu =g-gq if gq>=gf, =g-gf if gq<gf n=(gq-gf)/2, 22.27 Submitted With v n>=0 Ptho=1-Plto 0.12 1.00 recur In connection rG1 _� P1*=Plt [ 1+{ (N-1)g/(gf+gu/E11+4.24)) ) 0.52 Item' "� \Nater Foemad Ell (Figure 9-7) 1.66 ' E12=(1-Ptho**n)/Plto, E12>=1.0 1.00 owCIP fmin=2(1+Plt)/g or fmin=2(1+P1)/g 0.13 gdiff=max(gq-gf,0) 0.00 fm=[gf/g]+[gu/g][l/{l+Pl(Ell-1)1], (min=fmin;max=1.00) 0.74 PROJECT.doc 57 • J flt=fm=[gf/g]+gdiff[l/{1+Plt(E12-1)}] +[gu/g][l/(1+Plt(Ell-1)],(min=fmin,max=l.0) or flt=[fm+0.91(N-1)]/N*- flt Primary 0.826 For special case of single -lane approach opposed by multilane approach, see text. If P1>=1 for shared left -turn lanes with N>1, then assume de -facto left -turn lane and redo calculations. For permitted left -turns with multiple exclusive left -turn lanes, flt=fm. For special case of_multilane approach opposed by single -lane approach or when gf>gq, see text. SUPPLEMENTAL UNIFORM DELAY WORKSHEET EBLT WBLT NBLT SBLT Adj. LT Vol from Vol Adjustment Worksheet, v v/c ratio from Capacity Worksheet, X Primary phase effective green, g Secondary phase effective green, gq (From Supplemental Permitted IT Worksheet), gu Cycle 'length, C 115.0 Red=(C-g-gq-gu), r Arrivals: v/(3600(max(X,1.0))), qa Primary ph. departures: s/3600, sp Secondary ph. departures: s(gq+gu)/(gu*3600), ss XPerm XProt XCase Queue at begining of green arrow, Qa Queue at beginning of unsaturated green, Qu Residual queue, Qr Uniform Delay, dl DELAY/LOS WORKSHEET WITH INITIAL QUEUE Initial Dur. Appr/ Unmet Unmet Lane Demand Demand Group Q veh t hrs. Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Uniform Delay Initial Final Queue Unmet Unadj. Adj. Param. Demand ds d1 sec u Q veh Initial Lane Queue Group Delay Delay d3 sec d sec Intersection Delay 15.6 sec/veh Intersection LOS B Submitted into the Public recOOIin eons ec�#ionr �w.it�h PROJECT.doc item AZZ- 4 on j Falter Fceman 'C441 Clerk 58 E C7 APPENDIX F Roadway Link Level of Service for Future Traffic Volumes With Project Submitted into the public record in connection with item on Walter Foeman City Cleric oo-1036 1-1 • • L_ PARK PLACE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FUTUR_EAADT W/PROJECT 2005 _ CLASS LANES CONF TURN FACTORS A B C D E VOLUME TOD DIRECTION LOS LANES B_ACKGROUND_ PROJECT TOTAL SE 7th Street _ Brickell Avenue Miami Avenue 2 _ 2 1-WAY NO _ - 0.6_ 10 19 950 20,580 12,693 24 HR __ WB _ 12,693 C SE 8th Street Miami Avenue Brickell Avenue 2 2 1-WAY NO 0.6 13,740 19,950 20,580 15,750 24 HR EB 15,750 D Brickell Avenue- SE 7th Street Miami River 2 4 _ _D YES 22 900 32 500 34,300 40,045 24 HR 2-WAY_ 353 _ 40.398 F Brickell Avenue SE 13th Street SE 8th Street 2 4 D YES __1 1 22,900 32 500 34,300 41,036 24 HR 353 41,389 F Brickell Avenue_ SE 15th Road SE 13th Street _ 2 _ _ 4 _ D YES 1 _ _ 22,900 32,500 34 300 _ _ 33,102 _ 24 HR _2-WAY --- _ _ 2-WAY 192 26,470 F `SE/SW 15th Road - Miami Avenue Brickell Avenue OTHER 2 D NO 0.8 3 840 8 720 9,520 __ 24 HR 2-WAY 2306 8,690 D SE/SW 15th Road _ SW 2nd Avenue Miami Avenue OTHER 2 D _ NO _ __-0.8 _ _ _ 3,840 8,720 _ 9,520 _6,384 _ _ 8 071 _ 24-HR2-WAY _ _ 2252 10 323_ _ F Miami Avenue SW 15th Road SW 13th Street NS _ 2 UD_ YES 1 _ 8 600 1_4,600 16 000 _6,404 24 HR _____2-WAY _3057_9,461 D Miami Avenue SW 26th Road SW 15th Road NS 4 D NO . 1 11,600 23,800 25 400 8 426 24 HR 2-WAY 1199 9,625 C FUTURE W/PROJECT _ 2005 PEAK DIRECTION DIRECTION CLASS CONF_ TURN FACTORS A B C D E VOLUME_-_ LOS_ _LANES LANES BACKGROUND _TOD-, _DIRECTION PROJECT TOTAL SE 7th Street Brickell Avenue Miami Avenue _ 2 2 _t-WAY NO _ _ 1.2 _ _ 1 452 202 2,172 SE 8th Street Miami Avenue Brickell Avenue 2 2 1-WAY NO 1.2 1,452 2,052 2.172 Brickell Avenue _-_- SE 7th Street_ - _Miami River 2-- 4 D _ YES -- 1 _ 1,210 1,710 1 810 ---------- -- - -- ----- ----- --- Brickell Avenue SE 13th Street SE 8th Street 2 4 D YES 1 1.210 1,710 1 8810 _ Brickell Avenue ---- SE 15th Road - SE 13th Street 2 - _ 4 D YES 1 -- 1 210 - 1 710 _ 11810 ------ - --------- -------- -- ---- SE 13th Street Miami Avenue Brickell Avenue NS 2 LID NO 1 440 760 830 SE/SW 15th Road Miami Avenue Brickell Avenue OTHER 2 D NO 0.8 200 448 496 378 PM EB 36___ SE/SW 15th Road ----- SW 2nd Avenue Miami Avenue OTHER 2 D _ NO _ 0.8 200�7760 496 _ 574 PM E8 199 773 F Miami Avenue SW 15th Road SW 13th Street --- NS --- 2 UD YES - 1 -- 440 830 - 501SB - 27 528 - D Avenue SW 26th Road SW 15th Road --- NS 4 D NO 1 103D -i 1,750 603 PM SB 37 840 C CD cD 3� rs Cy*CDQ ;C)CD � o (D 06/05/2000 • • • • • APPENDIX G Level of Service For Future Plus Volumes With Modifications Submitted Into record in con itemn,� Public on with an Waiter ,Foeman 'City Clerk Project Traffic Intersection 66-1036 • • • Jackson M. Ahlstedt Jackson M. Ahlstedt, P.E. Jackson M. Ahlstedt, P.E. 46 N.W. 94th Street Miami Shores, Florida 33150 Phone: (305) 754-8695 E-Mail: HCS: Signals Release 3.1 Fax: (305) 754-8695 OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Intersection: SE 7TH ST/MIAMI AVE City/State: MIAMI/FLORIDA Analyst: J. AHLSTEDT Project No: PARK PLACE Time Period Analyzed: FUTURE W/PROJECT PM PEAK Date: 6/5/00 East/West Street Name: SE 7TH STREET North/South Street Name: MIAMI AVENUE Eastbound L T R Volume 1 PHF I PK 15 Vol I Hi Ln Vol 1 % Grade i Ideal Sat 1 ParkExist i NumPark 1 % Heavy Vehl No. Lanes 1 0 0 0 LGConfig l Lane Width l RTOR Vol Adj Flow I %InSharedLnl VOLUME DAT. Westbound I Northbound L T R 1 L T R I 1341 69 1814 478 0.80 0.75 10.74 0.83 419 23 1275 144 0 1 0 1900 11900 1900 IX X 120 20 0 0 10 0 0 3 0 1 2 1 0 TR I L T 12.0 112.0 12.0 0 1 1768 11100 576 Southbound L T R 0 0 0 Prop Turns i l 0.05 I I 1 NumPeds ! 1 0 I I- 0 1 NumBus l 1 0 10 0 1 1 Duration 1.00 Area Type: CBD or Similar OPERATING PARAMETERS 1 Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound 1 Southbound 1 i L T R 1 L T R I L T R 1 L T R 1 I Init Unmet l I I 0.0 I 10.0 i I 0.0 I I Arriv. Typel 1 3 13 3 I Unit Ext. 1 1 3.0 13.0 3.0 1 I I Factor I I 1.000 1 1.000 1 1 Lost Time I l 2.0 12.0 2.0 1 I Ext of g 1 1 2.0 12.0 2.0 1 1 Ped Min g I 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 1 PHASE DATA Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 OPTM=D.doc SubMitted into the page 1 Public recoPd 1f) canne t9a i��nt 'y.� alp -� � G ��ta � — �. � 3 �➢ Walter Foeman C7 11 ® EB Left Thru Right Peds WB Left Thru P Right P Peds NB Right SB Right Green 32.0 Yellow 4.0 All Red 1.0 Cycle Length: 80.0 Appr.i Mvt Movement Volume PHF I NB Left P I Thru P Right Ped SB Left Thru Right Ped I EB Right I WB Right I I 39.0 4.0 secs _VOLUME ADJUSTMENT WORBSHEET• Adjusted Prop. Prop. Flow No. Lane Flow Rate Left Right Rate Lanes Group RTOR In Lane Grp Turns Turns Eastbound Left 0 Thru 0 Right 0 Westbound Left 0 Thru 1341 0.80 1676 3 TR 1768 0.05 Right 69 0.75 92 0 0 Northbound Left 814 0.74 1100 2 L 1100 Thru 478 0.83 576 1 T 576 Right 0 Southbound Left 0 Thru 0 Right 0 Value entered by user. SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORRSHEET Appri Ideal Adj Lane Sat f f f f f f £ f f Sat Group Flow W HV G P BB A LU RT LT Flow Eastbound Sec IT Adj/LT Sat: Westbound Sec IT Adj/LT Sat: TR 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.90 0.91 0.992 1.000 4632 Northbound SUbm j Sec IT Ad j /LT Sat: tted into the OPMUZED.doc rec dLnc,PUblic page 2 iterr, rrr�ectie with Waiter Fpeman 0 0— 1 0 3 6 City Cferfc • L 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.900 1.000 0.90 0.97 ---- 0.950 2836 T 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.600 1.000 0.90 1.00 1.000 1.000 1368 Southbound Sec IT Adj/LT Sat: CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Adj Adj Sat Float/ Green --Lane Group-- Appri Lane Flow Rate Flow Rate Ratio Ratio Capacity vic Mvmt Group (v) (s) (vis) (9/C) (c) Ratio Eastbound Pri. Sec. Left Thru Right Westbound Pri. Sec. Left Thru TR 1768 4632 # 0.38 0.400 1853 0.95 Right Northbound Pri. Sec. Left L 1100 2836 0.39 0.488 1383. 0.80 Thru T 576 1368 # 0.42 0.488 667 0.86 Right Southbound Pri. Sec. Left Thru Right Sum (vis) critical = 0.80 Lost Time/Cycle, L = 8.00 sec Critical vic(X) = 0.86 LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEET Appri Ratios Unf Prog Lane Incremental Res Lane Group Approach Lane Del Adj Grp Factor Del Del Grp vic g/C dl Fact Cap k d2 d3 Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound Westbound TR 0.95 0.400 23.3 1.000 1853 0.50 16.8 0.0 40.1 D 40.1 D Northbound L 0.80 0.488 17.2 1.000 1383 0.50 5.0 0.0 22.2 C . T 0.86 0.488 18. 1:Ui7( OPTEVE2ED.doc Ir0if)5ihe 1pubI1C 0 34.2 recordin onne Itemction with On C 26.3 C page 3 Walter Foeman City Clerk _ 00 0 Southbound • Intersection Delay = 33.4 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED IT WORKSHEET for exclusive lefts APPROACH EB Cycle Length, C 60.0 sec Actual Green Time for Lane Group, G Effective Green Time for Lane Group, g Opposing Effective Green Time, go Number of Lanes in Lane Group, N Number of Opposing Lanes, No Adjusted Left -Turn Flow Rate, Vlt Proportion of Left Turns in Opposing Flow, Plto Adjusted Opposing Flow Rate, Vo Lost Time for Lane Group, tl Left Turns per Cycle: LTC=V1tC/3600 Opposing Flow per Lane, Per Cycle: Volc=VoC/3600fluo Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo (Table 9-2 or Eqn 9-7) gf=[Gexp(- a * (LTC *f b))]-tl, gf<=g Opposing Queue Ratio: qro=1-Rpo(go/C) gq=(4.943Volc*-0.762)[(gro#;1.061)-tl], gq<=g gu =g-gq if gq>=gf, =g-gf if gq<gf n=(gq-gf)/2, n>=0 Ptho=l-Plto P1-=Plt[l+{(N-1)g/(gf+gu/Ell+4.24))) Ell (Figure 9-7) E12=(1-Ptho*-n)/Plto, E12>=1.0 fmin=2(1+Plt)/g or fmin=2(1+P1)/g gdiff=max(gq-gf,0) fm=[gf/g]+[gu/g][l/ll+P1(Ell-1)}], (min=fmin;max=1.00) flt=fm=[gf/g]+gdiff[l/{l+Plt(E12-1)}] WB NB SB +[gu/g][l/(1+Plt(Ell-1)],(min=fmin;max=1.0) or flt=[fm+0.91(N-1)]/N** flt For special case of single -lane approach opposed by multilane_ approach, see text. If P1>=1 for shared left -turn lanes with N>1, then assume de -facto left -turn lane and redo calculations. +� For permitted left -turns with multiple exclusive left -turn lanes, flt=fm. For special case of multilane approach opposed by single -lane approach or when gf>gq, see text. SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED IT WORKSHEET for shared lefts APPROACH Cycle Length, C 80.0 sec Actual Green Time for Lane Group, G Effective Green Time for Lane Group, g Opposing Effective Green Time, go Number of Lanes in Lane Group, N Number of Opposing Lanes, No Adjusted Left -Turn Flow Rate, Vlt Proportion of Left Turns in Lane Group, Plt Proportion of Left Turns in Opposing Flow, Plto Adjusted Opposing Flow Rate, Vo OPTP IIZED.doc EB WB NB SB ` ubmittet, into recoP the Aublic ite L 4ezzconnection h on Walter Foeman City Clerk page 4 36 ® Lost Time for Lane Group, tl Left Turns per Cycle: LTC=V1tC/3600 Opposing Flow per Lane, Per Cycle: Volc=VoC/3600fluo Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo (Table 9-2 or Eqn 9-7) gf=[Gexp(- a } (LTC ** b))]-tl, gf<=g Opposing Queue Ratio: qro=1-Rpo(go/C) gq=(4.943Volc**0.762)[(gro**1.061)-tl], gq<=g gu =g-gq if gq>=gf, =g-gf if gq<gf n=(gq-gf)/2, n>=0 Ptho=l-Plto P1-=Plt[l+{(N-1)g/(gf+gu/Ell+4.24))) Ell (Figure 9-7) E12=(1-Ptho■ten)/Plto, E12>=1.0 fmin=2(1+Plt)/g or fmin=2(1+P1)/g gdiff=max(gq-gf,0) fm=[gf/g]+[gu/g][1/{l+Pl(Ell-1)}], (min=fmin;max=1.00) flt-fm=[gf/g]+gdiff[l/{l+Plt(E12-1)1] +[gu/g][1/(1+Plt(Ell-1)],(min=fmin;max=1.0) or flt=[fm+0.91(N-1)]/N-- flt Primary For special case of single -lane approach opposed by multilane approach, see text. *'If P1>=1 for shared left -turn lanes with N>l, then assume de -facto left -turn lane and redo calculations. For permitted left -turns with multiple exclusive left -turn lanes, flt=fm. For special case of multilane approach opposed by single -lane approach or when gf>gq, see text. SUPPLEMENTAL UNIFORM DELAY WORKSHEET EBLT WBLT NBLT SBLT • Adj. LT Vol from Vol Adjustment Worksheet, v v/c ratio from Capacity Worksheet, X Primary phase effective green, g Secondary phase effective green, gq (From Supplemental Permitted LT Worksheet), gu Cycle length, C 80.0 Red=(C-g-gq-gu), r Arrivals: v/(3600(max(X,1.0))), qa Primary ph. departures: s/3600, sp Secondary ph. departures: s(gq+gu)/(gu*3600), ss XPerm XProt XCase Queue at begining of green arrow, Qa Queue at beginning of unsaturated green, Qu Residual queue, Qr Uniform Delay, dl DELAY/LOS WORKSHEET WITH INITIAL QUEUE Initial Dur. Uniform Delay Initial Final Initial Lane Appr/ Unmet Unmet Queue Unmet Queue Group Lane Demand Demand Unadj. Adj. Param. emand Delay Delay Group Q veh t hrs. ds dl sec u Q veh d3 sec d sec Eastbound Westbound Submitted into the ' Public recor in CORfie t Ora with item on _ , / 0 Walter Foernan OPTIIVIIZED.doc page 5 City Clerk 00-106 • Northbound Southbound Intersection Delay 33.4 seciveh Intersection LOS C OPTIMIZED. doc Submitted into the reoo��in,conne public item j-otion with on Q Walter Foeman �,> ... City Clqg�e 6 • • • • Jackson M. Ahlstedt Jackson M. Ahlstedt, P.E. Jackson M. Ahlstedt, P.E. 46 N.W. 94th Street Miami Shores, Florida 33150 Phone: (305) 754-8695 E-Mail: Intersection: City/State: Analyst: Project No: Time Period Analyzed: Date: East/West Street Name: North/South Street Name: HCS: Signals Release 3.1 Fax: (305) 754-8695 OPERATIONAL ANALYSI SE 8TH ST/BRICKELL AVE MIAMI/FLORIDA J. AHLSTEDT PARK PLACE FUTURE W/PROJECT PM PEAK 6/5/00 SE 8TH STREET BRICKELL AVENUE VOLUME DATA Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I L T R I L T R 1 L T R I L T R Volume I 1563 551 365 I 1457 I 853 1 2656 293 I 1342 1640 PHF 10.63 0.80 0.64 10.90 0.94 1 0.93 0.84 10.86 0.88 PK 15 Vol 1170 172 143 1127 227 1 714 87 199 466 Hi Ln Vol I I I I % Grade 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 Ideal Sat 11900 1900 11900 1900 1 1900 1900 11900 1900 ParkExist I I I I NumPark I I I I % Heavy Veh12 2 2 12 2 1 2 2 12 2 No. Lanes 1 2 2 0 1 2 0 1 1 0 2 1 1 2 3 0 LGConfig I L TR I L R I T R I L T Lane Width 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 1 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 RTOR Vol I I Adj Flow 1678 689 1508 1 2856 1396 1864 %InSharedLnl I I I Prop Turns I I I I NumPeds 1 50 1 50 1 50 1_ NumBus 10 0 10 0 1 0 0 10 0 Duration 1.00 Area Type: CBD or Similar v N OPERATING PARAMETERS cd Eastbound I Westbound 1 Northbound 1 Southbound a p 1 L T R 1 L T R i L T R I L T R Io L U Init Unmet 10.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 1 0.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 I� c CU Arriv. Type13 3 13 3 1 3 3 13 3 c 10 O �y Unit Ext. 13.0 3.0 13.0 3.0 1 3.0 3.0 13.0 3.0 Ic v I Factor 1 1.000 1 1.000 1 1.000 1 1.000 1� Lost Time 12.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 1 2.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 1 Ext of g 12.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 1 2.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 1: Ped Min g 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 L PHASE DATk- v b Phase Combination 1 OPMUZED.doc 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 page 7 UU-:�.�3 C� EB Left A NB Left Thru A I Thru Right A J Right Peds I Ped WB Left A A J SB Left A Thru I Thru A Right A I Right Peds I Ped NB Right J EB Right SB Right I I WB I I Right Green 24.0 10.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 All Red 1.0 1.0 P P P 8.0 55.0 3.0 4.0 0.0 1.0 Cycle Length: 115.0 secs VOLUME ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET Adjusted Prop. Prop. Appr./ Mvt Flow No. Lane Flow Rate Left Right Movement Volume PHF Rate Lanes Group RTOR In Lane Grp Turns Turns Eastbound Left 563 0.83 678 2 L 678 Thru 551 0.80 689 2 TR 689 Right 365 0.64 0 Westbound Left 457 0.90 508 2 L 50B Thru 0 Right 853 0.94 1 R Northbound Left 0 Thru 2656 0.93 2856 2 T 2856 Right 293 0.84 1 R Submitted into the public recor in connection Southbound with Left 342 0.86 398 2 L 398 item ) L on J I�6e, Thru 1640 0.88 1864 3 T 1864 Walter Foeman Right 0 City Clerk } Value entered by user. SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTXWr WORKSHEET Appr/ Ideal Adj Lane Sat f f f f f f f f f Sat Group Flow W HV G P BB A LU RT LT Flow Eastbound Sec IT Adj/LT Sat: - L 1900 1.000 0.980 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.90 0.97 ---- 0.950 3090 TR 1900 1.000 0.980 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.90 0.95 1.000 Westbound Sec LT Adj/LT Sat: 0.757 2463 L 1900 1.000 0.980 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.90 0.97 ---- 0.950 3090 R 1900 1.000 0.980 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.90 1.00 ---- Northbound Sec LT Adj/LT Sat: OPTUVHZED.doe page 8 • 0 T 1900 1.000 0.980 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.90 0.95 1.000 R 1900 1.000 0.980 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.90 1.00 ---- Southbound Sec IT Adj/LT Sat: L 1900 1.000 0.980 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.90 0.97 ---- 0.950 3090 T 1900 1.000 0.980 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.90 0.91 1.000 1.000 4577 CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Adj Adj Sat Flow Green --Lane Group— Appr/ Lane Flow Rate Flow Rate Ratio Ratio Capacity v/c Mvmt Group (v) (s) (v/s) (g/C) (c) Ratio Eastbound Pri. Sec. Left L Thru TR Right Westbound Pri.. Sec. Left L Thru Right R Northbound Pri. Sec. Left Thru T Right R Southbound Pri. Sec. Left L Thru T Right 678 3090 0.22 689 508 3090 0.16 0 2463 0.00 508 2856 0.209 645 1.05 0.087 0.217 672 0.76 0.122 300 0.00 0.339 972 0.52 0.087 0.478 0.478 398 3090 0.13 0.070 215 1.85 1864 4577 0.41 0.574 2627 0.71 Sum (v/s) critical = 0.00 Lost Time/Cycle, L = 0.00 sec Critical v/c(X) = 0.00 LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEET Appr/ Ratios Unf Prog Lane Incremental Res Lane Group Approach Lane Del Adj Grp Factor Del Del Grp v/c g/C dl Fact Cap k d2 d3 Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 1.05 0.209 45.5 1.000 645 0.50 132.1 0.0 177.6 F TR 0.087 1.000 0.0 177.6 F Westbound Submitted L 0.52 0.339 1.000 972 0.13 0.5 0.0 into th e public recor in COnneCtion R 0.067 1.000 0.0 Item with Northbound on Walter Foeman T 0.478 1.000 0.50 0.0 City Clerk R 0.478 1.000 0.50 0.0 OPTUVUED.doc page 9 00-�.03� 0 • Southbourid L 1.85 0.070 53.5 1.000 215 0.50 0.0 T 0.71 0.574 17.6 1.000 2627 0.27 0.9 0.0 18.5 B 18.5 Intersection Delay = 60.9 (sec/veh•) Intersection LOS E SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED IT WORKSHEET for exclusive lefts APPROACH EB WB NB Cycle Length, C 115.0 sec Actual Green Time for Lane Group, G 39.0 Effective Green Time for Lane Group, g 14.00 Opposing Effective Green Time, go 10.0 Number of Lanes in Lane Group, N 2 Number of Opposing Lanes, No 2 Adjusted Left -Turn Flow Rate, Vlt 508 Proportion of Left Turns in Opposing Flow, Plto 0.00 Adjusted Opposing Flow Rate, Vo 689 Lost Time for Lane Group, tl 4.00 Left Turns per Cycle: LTC=V1tC/3600 16.23 Opposing Flow per Lane, Per Cycle: Volc=VoC/3600fluo 11.58 Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo (Table 9-2 or Eqn 9-7) 1.00 gf=[Gexp(- a * (LTC'** b))]-tl, gf<=g 0.0 Opposing Queue Ratio: qro=1-Rpo(go/C) 0.91 gq=(4.943Volc**0.762)[(gro**1.061)-tl], gq<-g 14.00 gu =g-gq if gq>=gf, =g-gf if gq<gf 0.00 n=(gq-gf)/2, n>=0 7.00 Ptho=1-Plto 1.00 P1*=Plt[l+{(N-1)g/(gf+gu/Ell+4.24))) 4.30 Ell (Figure 9-7) 2.57 E12=(1-Ptho**n)/Plto, E12>=1.0 1.00 fmin=2(1+Plt)/g or fmin=2(1+P1)/g 0.76 gdiff=max(gq-gf,0) 0.00 fm=[gf/g]+[gu/g][1/{l+P1(Ell-1)}], (min=fmin;max=1.00) 0.76 flt=fm=[gf/g]+gdiff[l/{l+Plt(E12-1)}] +[gu/g][l/(1+Plt(Ell-1)],(min=fmin;max=1.0) or flt=[fm+0.91(N-1)]/N** fit 0.757 For special case of single -lane approach opposed by multilane_ approach, see text. * If P1>=1 for shared left -turn lanes with N>1, then assume de -facto SB left -turn lane and redo calculations. ** For permitted left -turns with multiple exclusive left -turn lanes, flt=fm. For special case of multilane approach opposed by single -lane approach or when gf>gq, see text. SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED IT WORKSHEET for shared lefts APPROACH Cycle Length, C 115:0 sec Actual Green Time for Lane Group, G Effective Green Time for Lane Group, g Opposing Effective Green Time, go Number of Lanes in Lane Group, N Number of Opposing Lanes, No Adjusted Left -Turn Flow Rate, Vlt Proportion of Left Turns in Lane Group, Pit Proportion of Left Turns in Opposing Flow, Pita Adjusted Opposing Flow Rate, Vo OPTIMIZED.doc EB WB NB SB Submitted into the public recur in connection i$e - with on l:4(a Walter Foe'man City Clefoage 10 0001u36 A J Lost Time for Lane Group, tl Left Turns per Cycle: LTC=V1tC/3600 Opposing Flow per Lane, Per Cycle: Volc=VoC/3600fluo Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo (Table 9-2 or Eqn 9-7) gf=[Gexp(- a * (LTC ** b))]-tl, gf<=g Opposing Queue Ratio: qro=1-Rpo(go/C) gq=(4.943Volc**0.762)[(gro**1.061)-tl], gq<=g gu =g-gq if gq>=gf, =g-gf if gq<gf n=(gq-gf)/2, n>=0 Ptho=l-Plto P1*=Plt[1+{(N-1)g/(gf+gu/Ell+4.24))) Ell (Figure 9-7) E12=(1-Ptho**n)/Plto, E12>p1.0 fmin=2(1+Plt)/g or fmin=2(1+P1)/g gdiff=max(gq-gf,0) fm=[gf/g]+[gu/g][1/11+P1(Ell-1)}1, (min=fmin;max=1.00) flt=fm=[gf/g]+gdiff[1/11+Plt(E12-1)1] +[gu/9][l/(1+Plt(Ell-1)],(min=fmin;max=1.0) or flt=[fm+0.91(N-1)]/N** flt Primary For special case of single -lane approach opposed by multilane approach, see text. * If P1>=1 for shared left -turn lanes with N>l, then assume de -facto left -turn lane and redo calculations. ** For permitted left -turns with multiple exclusive left -turn lanes, flt=fm. For special case of multilane approach opposed by single -lane approach or when gf>gq, see text. SUPPLEMENTAL UNIFORM DELAY WORKSHEET Adj. LT Vol from Vol Adjustment Worksheet, v v/c ratio from Capacity Worksheet, X Primary phase effective green, g Secondary phase effective green, gq (From Supplemental Permitted LT Worksheet), gu Cycle length, C 115.0 Red=(C-g-gq-gu), r Arrivals: v/(3600(max(X,1.0))), qa Primary ph. departures: s/3600, sp Secondary ph. departures: s(gq+gu)/(gu*3600), ss XPerm XProt XCase Queue at begining of green arrow, Qa Queue at beginning, of unsaturated green, Qu Residual queue, Qr Uniform Delay, dl EBLT WBLT NBLT SBLT 508 0.00 14.00 14.00 0.00 76.0 0.14 0.858 14.00 9.99 0.66 3 12.70 DELAY/LOS WORKSHEEI WITH INITIAL QUEUE 1.98 Initial Dur. Uniform Delay Initial Final Initial Lane Appr/ Unmet, Unmet Queue Unmet Queue Group Lane Demand Demand Unadj. Adj. Param. Demand Delay Delay Group Q veh t hrs. ds dl sec u Q veh d3 sec d sec Eastbound Westbound Submitted into rECOPd the pUbi1C 'te1p��� cORReCt9pR With ---L on Welter F OPTIM7ZED.doc r;, „ oemaR City Clerk page 11 0—HOG . Northbound 0 Southbound Intersection Delay 60.9 seciveh Intersection LOS E OPTIMIZED.doc Submitted into the public record in connection with item on I (_ /&; La C/ Walter Foeman 4, City Clerk page 12 i—IU,,Q6 • • • Jackson M. Ahlstedt Jackson M. Ahlstedt, P.E. Jackson M. Ahlstedt, P.E. 46 N.W. 94th Street Miami Shores, Florida 33150 Phone: (305) 754-8695 E-Mail: Intersection: City/State: Analyst: Project No: Time Period Analyzed: Date: East/West Street Name: North/South Street Name: Eastbound L T R I Volume 1124 289 247 PHF 10.50 0.81 0.86 PK 15 Vol 162 89 72 Hi Ln Vol 1 % Grade 1 0 Ideal Sat I 1900 ParkExist NumPark 1 % Heavy Veh10 0 0 No. Lanes I 0 2 0 LGConfig I LTR Lane Width 1 12.0 RTOR Vol I 160 Adj Flow 1 706 %InSharedLn1 Prop Turns 10.35 0.14 NumPeds I 0 NumBus I 0 HCS: Signals Release 3.1 Fax: (305) 754-8695 OPERATIONAL ANALYSI SE 15TH RD AND MIAMI AVE MIAMI/FLA J. AHLSTEDT PARK PLACE FUTURE W/PROJECT PM PK HR 6/5/00 SE 151H ROAD S. MIAMI AVENUE VOLUME DATA Westbound 1 Northbound I Southbound L T R i L T R I L T R ! 177 139 67 ! 189 145 65 I 128 265 10.82 0.93 0.46 10.81 0.87 0.73 10.63 0.70 0.61 123 37 36 127 42 22 111 95 8 I I 0 i I 0 I I 0 1 I 1900 1 I 1900 1 I 1900 I 10 0 0 I 10 0 0 I 10 0 0 1 0 2 0 i 0 2 0 1 0 2 0 1 LTR 1 LTR 1 LTR 1 12.0 ( 12.0 1 12.0 1 0 1 0 i 0 1 389 1 366 1 454 I 10.24 0.38 I 10.30 0.24 I 10.10 0.07 1 0 1 0 1- 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 Duration 1.00 Area Type: All other areas V OPERATING PARAMETERS C S U Q I Eastbound 1 Westbound 1 Northbound I Southbound 1� O LL ?' L T R i L T R i L T R i L T R U N Init Unmet 1 0.0 I 0.0 i 0.0 I 0.0 c o CO Arriv. Typel 3 1 3 i 3 I 3 (= v Unit Ext. I 3.0 1 3.0 1 3.0 I 3.0 I Factor 1 1.000 1 1.000 1 1.000 1 1.000 ,Ij C l Lost Time I 2.0 1 2.0 1 2.0 I 2.0 -'J Est of g I 2.0 I 2.0 ( 2.0 1 2.0 �nN E Pod Min g ! 0.0 1 0.0 ( 0.0 i 0.0 2 v E PHASE DATA ` '- Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 OPTIMIZED.doc 5 6 7 8 page 13 An0-1036 0 • EB Left A Thru A Right A Peds WB Left A Thru A Right A Peds NB Right SB Right Green 25.0 Yellow 4.0 All Red 1.0 Cycle Length: 60.0 Appr./ Mvt Movement Volume PHF NB Left A Thru A Right A Ped SB Left A Thru A Right A Ped EB Right I I WB Right I Submitted into the public 25.0 recO n connection with 4.0 _ item G� on 1.0 Walter Foeman secs City Clerk _VOLUME ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET Adjusted Prop. Prop. Flow No. Lane Flow Rate Left Right Rate Lanes Group RTOR In Lane Grp Turns Turns Eastbound Left 124 0.50 248 0 Thru. 289 0.81 357 2 LTR 706 0.35 0.14 Right 247 0.86 101 0 160 Westbound Left 77 0.82 94 0 Thru 139 0.93 149 2 LTR 389 0.24 0.38 Right 67 0.46 146. 0 0 Northbound Left 89 0.81 110 0 Thru 145 0.87 167 2 LTR 366 0.30 0.24 Right 65 0.73 89 0 0 Southbound Left 28 0.63 44 0 Thru 265 0.70 379 2 LTR 454 0.10 0.07 Right 0.61 31 0 0 # Value entered by user. SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET Appr/ Ideal Adj Lane Sat f f f f f f f f f Sat Group Flow W HV G P BB A LU RT LT Flow Eastbound Sec IT Adj/LT Sat: LTR 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 0.95 0.979 0.701 2475 Westbound Sec IT Adj/LT Sat: LTR 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 0.95 0.944 0.699 2381 Northbound Sec LT Adj/LT Sat: OPTRv=D.doc page 14 00- U36 LTR 1900 1.000 1.00 0 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 0.95 0.964 0.736 2561 Southbound Sec IT Adj/LT Sat: LTR 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 0.95 0.990 0.894 3194 CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Adj Adj Sat Flow Green --Lane Group-- Appr/ Lane Flow Rate Flow Rate Ratio Ratio Capacity v/c Mvmt Group (v) (s) (v/s) (g/C) (c) Ratio Eastbound Pri. Sec. Left Thru LTR 706 2475 # 0.29 0.417 1031 0.68 Right Westbound Pri. Sec. Left Thru LTR 389 2381 0.16 0.417 992 0.39 Right Northbound Pri. Sec. Left Thru LTR 366 2561 # 0.14 0.417 1067 S bmitted Ore into the public Right 0 In connection With �terrl od Southbound - Pri. Walter Foeman Sea. City Cleric Left Thru LTR 454 3194 0.14 0.417 1331 0.34 Right Sum (v/s) critical = 0.43 Lost Time/Cycle, L = 6.00 sec Critical v/c(X) = 0.52 LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEET Appr/ Ratios Unf Prog Lane Incremental Res Lane Group Approach Lane Del Adj Grp Factor Del Del Grp v/c g/C d1 Fact Cap k d2 d3 Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound LTR 0.68 0.417 14.3 1.000 1031 0.25 1.9 0.0 16.2 B 16.2 B Westbound LTR 0.39 0.417 12.2 1.000 992 0.11 0.3 0.0 12.5 B 12.5 B Northbound is LTR 0.34 0.417 11.9 1.000 1067 0.11 0.2 0.0 12.1 B 12.1 B OPT841ZED.doc page 15 �- 036 • is Southbound LTR 0.34 0.417 11.9 1.000 1331 0.11 0.2 0.0 12.1 B 12.1 B Intersection Delay = 13.7 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED LT WORKSHEET for exclusive lefts APPROACH Cycle Length, C 60.0 sec Actual Green Time for Lane Group, G Effective Green Time for Lane Group, g Opposing Effective Green Time, go Number of Lanes in Lane Group, N Number of Opposing Lanes, No Adjusted Left -Turn Flow Rate, Vlt Proportion of Left Turns in Opposing Flow, Plto Adjusted Opposing Flow Rate, Vo Lost Time for Lane Group, tl Left Turns per Cycle: LTC=V1tC/3600 Opposing Flow per Lane, Per Cycle: Volc=VoC/3600fluo. Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo (Table 9-2 or Eqn 9-7) gf=[Gexp(- a * (LTC :f b))]-tl, gf<=g Opposing Queue Ratio: qro=1-Rpo(go/C) gq=(4.943Volc-}0..762)[(gro**1.061)-tl], gq<=g gu =g-gq if gq>=gf, =g-gf if gq<gf n=(gq-gf)/2, n>=0 Ptho=l-Plto P1*=Plt[l+{(N-1)g/(gf+gu/Ell+4.24))) Ell (Figure 9-7) E12=(1-Ptho**n)/Plto, E12>=1.0 fmin=2(1+Plt)/g or fmin=2(1+P1)/g gdiff=max(gq-gf,0) fm=[gf/g]+[gu/g][1/{1+P1(Ell-1)}], (min=fmin;max=1.00) flt=fm=[gfig]+gdiff[l/{l+Plt(E12-1)}] EB WB NB SB SubMitied into the reco d in connection Public iterrr with on -CC Welter Foeman City Clerk +[gu/g][l/(1+Plt(Ell-1)],(min=fmin;max=1.0) or flt=[fm+0.91(N-1)]/N:- fit For special case of single -lane approach opposed by multilane approach, see text.. If P1>=1 for shared left -turn lanes with N>1, then assume de -facto left -turn lane and redo calculations. �¢ For permitted left -turns with multiple exclusive left -turn lanes, flt=fm. For special case of multilane approach opposed by single -lane approach or when gf>gq, see text. SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED IT WORKSHEET for shared lefts APPROACH Cycle Length, C 60.0 sec Actual Green Time for Lane Group, G Effective Green Time for Lane Group, g Opposing Effective Green Time, go Number of Lanes in Lane Group, N Number of Opposing Lanes, No Adjusted Left -Turn Flow Rate, Vlt Proportion of Left Turns in Lane Group, Pit Proportion of Left Turns in Opposing Flow, Pita Adjusted Opposing Flow Rate, Vo OPTUV=D.doc EB WB NB SB 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 248 94 110 44 0.35 0.24 0.30 0.10 0.24 0.35 0.10 0.30 389 706 454 366 page 16 00_:�03 • Lost Time for Lane Group, tl 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 Left Turns per Cycle: LTC=V1tC/3600 4.13 1.57 1.63 0.73 Opposing Flow per Lane, Per Cycle: Volc=VoC/3600fluo 3.41 6.19 3.98 3.21 Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo (Table 9-2 or Eqn 9-7) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 gf=[Gexp(- a * (LTC ** b))]-tl, gf<=g 0.0 3.4 2.4 8.3 Opposing Queue Ratio: qro=1-Rpo(go/C) 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 gq=(4.943Volc**0.762)[(gro**l.061)-tl], gq<-g 0.49 5.10 1.36 0.19 gu =g-gq if gq>=gf, =g-gf if gq<gf 24.51 19.90 22.60 16.66 n=(gq-gf)/2, n>=0 0.25 0.85 0.00 0.00 Ptho=1-Plto 0.76 0.65 0.90 0.70 P1*=Plt[l+{(N-1)g/(gf+gu/Ell+4.24))) 0.90 0.66 0.75 0.21 Ell (Figure 9-7) 2.10 2.92 2.25 2.05 E12=(1-Ptho**n)/Plto, E12>=1.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 fmin=2(1+Plt)/g or fmin=2(1+P1)/g 0.15 0.13 0.14 0.10 gdiff=max(gq-gf,0) 0.49 1.70 0.00 0.00 fm=[gf/g]+[gu/g][1/{1+P1(Ell-1)}], (min=fmin;max=1.00) 0.49 0.49 0.56 0.88 flt=fm=[gf/g]+gdiff[l/fl+Plt(E12-1)1] +[gu/g][l/(l+Plt(Ell-1)],(min=fmin;max=1.0) or flt=[fm+0.91(N-1)]/N** flt Primary 0.701 0.699 0.736 0.894 For special case of single -lane approach apposed by multilane approach, see text. * If P1>=1 for shared left -turn lanes with N>l, then assume de -facto left -turn lane and redo calculations. ** For permitted left -turns with multiple exclusive left -turn lanes, flt=fm. For special case of multilane approach opposed by single -lane approach or when gf>gq, see text. SUPPLEMENTAL UNIFORM DELAY WORKSHEET EBLT WBLT NBLT SBLT Adj. LT Vol from Vol Adjustment Worksheet, v v/c ratio from Capacity Worksheet, X Primary phase effective green, g Secondary phase effective green, gq (From Supplemental Permitted IT Worksheet), Su Cycle length, C 60.0 Red=(C-g-gq-gu), r Arrivals: v/(3600(max(X,1.0))), qa Primary ph. departures: s/3600, sp Secondary ph. departures: s(gq+gu)/(gu*3600), ss XPerm XProt XCase Queue at begining of green arrow, Qa Queue at beginning of unsaturated green, Qu Residual queue, Qr Uniform Delay, dl DELAY/LOS WORKSHEET WITH INITIAL QUEUE Initial Dur. Uniform Delay Initial Final Initial Lane Appr/ Unmet Unmet Queue Unmet Queue Group Lane Demand Demand Unadj. Adj. Param. Demand Delay Delay Group Q veh t hrs. ds dl sec. u Q veh d3 sec d sec Eastbound Submitted into the public Westbound recor in connection with item on _LL9 G_/ Walter Foeman OPTINUED.doc City Clerk page 17 6,0-1036 • E Northbound Southbound Intersection Delay 13.7 seciueh Intersection LOS H Submitted into the public recor in connection with item on Walter Foeman City Clerk OPTMEZED.doc page 18 0®`1036 E • • • • Jackson M. Ahlstedt Jackson M. Ahlstedt, P.E. Jackson M. Ahlstedt, P.E. 46 N.W. 94th Street Miami Shores, Florida 33150 Phone: (305) 754-6695 E-Mail: . Intersection: City/State: Analyst: Project No: Time Period Analyzed: Date: East/West Street Name: North/South Street Name: HCS: Signals Release 3.1 Fax: (305) 754-8695 OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS SE 13TH ST\BRICKELL AVE MIAMI/FLORIDA J. AHLSTEDT PARK PLACE PM PK HR - FUTURE W/PROJECT 6/5/00 SE 13TH STREET BRICKELL AVENUE ( Eastbound L T R I Volume 1401 195 239 PHF 10.80 0.76 0.92 PK 15 Vol 1125 64 65 Hi Ln Vol I % Grade 1 0 Ideal Sat 11900 1900 ParkExist J NumPark I % Heavy Veh(0 0 0 No. Lanes 1 2 1 0 LGConfig I L TR Lane Width 112.0 12.0 RTOR Vol 1 0 Adj Flow 1501 517 %InSharedLnl Prop Turns 1 0.50 NumPeds 1 0 NumBus 10 0 VOLUME Westbound ( Northbound 1 Southbound L T R I L T R L T R i I 183 411 148 1439 1800 111 195 1871 755 0.76 0.75 0.70 10.91 0.88 0.60 10.74 0.94 0.88 60 137 53 1121 511 46 132 498 214 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1900 1900 11900 1900 11900 1900 1900 I I I I 0 0 0 10 0 0 10 0 0 1 2 0 ( 1 2 0 1 1 2 1 L TR ( L TR 1 L T R 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 0 1 0 I 0 241 759 1482 2230 112E 1990 858 I I 0.28 1 0.08 1 0 1 0 1_ 0 0 0 10 0 10 0 0 Duration 1.00 Area Type: All other areas O OPERATING PARAMETERS E U i Eastbound L T R I Westbound L T R 1 Northbound L T R ( Southbound L T R 1 O. c O �� LL i i i i 2 Init Unmet 10.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 Arriv. Type13 3 13 3 13 3 13 3 3 CZ 1 O Unit Ext. 13.0 3.0 13.0 3.0 13.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 1 �_ o I Factor 1 1.000 1 1.000 ( 1.000 1 1.000 U ( Lost Time 12.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 2.0 ( j, Ext of g 12.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 2.0 1 `V Ped Min g 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 E O PHASE DATA Phase Combination 1 2 OPTIMIZED.doc 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 page 19 e • • • • EB Left A Thru A Right A Peds WB Left A Thru A Right A Peds NB Right SB Right A Green 16.0 15.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 All Red 1.0 1.0 Cycle Length: 120.0 secs NB Left A Thru A I Right A I Ped I SB Left A Thru A j Right A Ped i EB Right I I WB Right I 74.0 4.0 1.0 _VOLUME ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET Adjusted Prop. Prop. Appr./ Mvt Movement Volume PHF Flow Rate No. Lanes Lane Group RTOR Flow Rate Left In Lane Grp Turns Right Turns Eastbound Left 401 0.80 501 2 L 501 Thru 195 0.76 257 1 TR 517 0.50 Right 239 0.92 260 0 0 Westbound Left 183 0.76 241 1 L 241 Thru 411 0.75 548 2 TR 759 0.28 Right 148 0.70 211 0 0 Northbound Left 439 0.91 482 1 L 482 Thru 1800 0.88 2045 2 TR 2230 0.08 Right 111 0.60 185 0 0 S ubmitted Southbound rec0 Into th �' In Left 95 0.74 128 1 L 128 item cOnne PUblic Thru 1871 0.94 1990 2 T 1990 ctlpn Right 755 0.38 858 1 R 0 858 �lt� cn _/.�il-� it Walter Value entered by user. "Q ernan C'ty SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET Clerk Appr/ Ideal Adj Lane Sat f f f f f f f f f Sat Group Flow W HV G P BB A LU RT LT Flow Eastbound Sec IT Adj/LT Sat: L 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 0.97 ---- 0.950 3502 TR 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 1.00 0.925 1.000 1757 Westbound Sec IT Adj/LT Sat: L 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 1.00 ---- 0.950 1805 TR 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 0.95 0.958 1.000 3459 Northbound Sec LT Adj/LT Sat: OPTEVEIZED.doc page 20 • • L 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 1.00 ---- 0.054 103 TR 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 0.95 0.988 1.000 3565 • Southbound Sec IT Adj/LT Sat: L 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 1.00 ---- 0.054 103 T 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 0.95 1.000 1.000 3610 R 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 1.00 0.850 ---- 1615 CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Adj Adj.Sat Flow Green --Lane Group-- Appr/ Lane Flow Rate Flow Rate Ratio Ratio Capacity v/c Mvmt Group (v) (s) (v/s) (g/C) (c) Ratio Eastbound Pri. Sec. Left L Thru TR Right Westbound Pri. Sec. Left L Thru TR Right Northbound Pri. Sec. Left L Thru TR Right Southbound Pri. Sec. Left L Thru T Right R 501 3502 0.14 0.133 467 1.07 517 1757 # 0.29 0.133 234 2.21 241 1805 0.13 0.125 226 1.07 759 3459 # 0.22 0.125 432 1.76 482 103 # 4.68 0.617 64 2230 3565 0.63 0.617 2198 128 103 1.24 0.617 64 1990 3610 0.55 0.617 2226 858 1615 0.53 0.792 1279 witted b. into CO in the public it@� °nnect1pn On ~� Walter F 2.00 0.89 °eman C'ty C/ems 0.67 Sum (v/s) critical = 5.19 Lost Time/Cycle. L = 12.00 sec Critical v/c(X) = 5.77 - LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEET Appr/ Ratios Unf Prog Lane Incremental Res Lane Group Approach Lane Del Adj Grp Factor Del Del Grp v/c g/C dl Fact Cap k d2 d3 Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 1.07 0.133 52.0 1.000 467 0.50 173.9 0.0 225.9 F TR 2.21 0.133 52.0 1.000 234 0.50 0.0 225.9 F Westbound L 1.07 0.125 52.5 1.000 226 0.50 197.1 0.0 249.6 F TR 1.76 0.125 52.5 1.000 432 0.50 0.0 249.6 F Northbound L 7.53 0.617 23.0 1.000.64 0.50 0.0 TR 1.01 0.617 • 23.0 1.000 2198 0.50 53.9 0.0 76.9 E 76.9 E OPTPv=D.doc page 21 60-iun36 • Southbound L 2.00 0.617 23.0 1.000 64 0.50 0.0 T 0.89 0.617 19.6 1.000 2226 0.42 5.5 0.0 25.2 C 25.2 C R 0.67 0.792 5.6 1.000 1279 0.24 1.4 0.0 6.9 A Intersection Delay = 79.6 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = E SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED IT WORKSHEET for exclusive lefts APPROACH EB Cycle Length, C 120.0 sec Actual Green Time for Lane Group, G Effective Green Time for Lane Group, g Opposing Effective Green Time, go Number of Lanes in Lane Group, N Number of Opposing Lanes, No Adjusted Left -Turn Flow Rate, Vlt Proportion of Left Turns in Opposing Flow, Plto Adjusted Opposing Flow Rate, Vo Lost Time for Lane Group, tl Left Turns per Cycle: LTC=V1tC/3600 Opposing Flow per Lane, Per Cycle: Volc=VoC/3600fluo Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo (Table 9-2 or Eqn 9-7) gf=[Gexp(- a * (LTC ** b))]-tl, gf<=g Opposing Queue Ratio: qro=1-Rpo(go/C)• gq=(4.943Volc**0.762)[(gro*-1.061)-tl], gq<ag gu =g-gq if gq>=gf, =g-gf if gq<gf n=(gq-gf)/2, n>=0 Ptho=1-Plto P1*=Plt[l+{(N-1)g/(gf+gu/Ell+4.24)))- Ell (Figure 9-7) E12=(1-Ptho**n)/Plto, E12>=1.0 fmin=2(1+Plt)/g or fmin=2(1+P1)/g gdiff--max(gq-gf,0) fm=[gf/g]+[gu/g][l/{l+P1(Ell-1)1], (min=fmin;max=1.00) flt=fm=[gf/g]+gdiff[l/{l+Plt(E12-1)1] WB NB SB 74.0 74.0 74.00 74.00 74.0 74.0 1 1 2 2 482 126 0.00 0.00 1990 2230 4.00 4.00 16.07 4.27 34.91 39.12 1.00 1.00 0.0 0.0 0.38 0.38 60.01 74.00 13.99 0.00 30.01 37.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 9.53 12.24 1.00 1.00 0.05 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.05 +[gu/g][1/(1+Plt(El 1-1)],(min=fmin;max=1.0) or fit=[fm+0.91(N-1)]/N*; fit 0.054 0.054 For special case of single -lane approach opposed by multilane_ approach, see text. * If Pl>=1 for shared left -turn lanes with N>1, then assume de -facto left -turn lane and redo calculations. ** For permitted left -turns with multiple exclusive left -turn lanes, flt=fm. For special case of multilane approach opposed by single -lane approach or when gf>gq, see text. SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED LT WORKSHEET for shared lefts APPROACH Cycle Length, C 120.0 sec Actual Green Time for Lane Group, G Effective Green Time for Lane Group, g Opposing Effective Green Time, go Number of Lanes in Lane Group, N Number of Opposing Lanes, No Adjusted Left -Turn Flow Rate, Vlt Proportion of Left Turns in Lane Group, Pit Proportion of Left Turns in Opposing Flow, Plto Adjusted Opposing Flow Rate, Vo OPTRv=D.doc EB WB NB SB Submitted record i Into the Pub/ item onnection �tvvllthh,ic on !,� Walter Poeman City Cte 22 Lost Time for Lane Group, tl Left Turns per Cycle: LTC=V1tC/3600 Opposing Flow per Lane, Per Cycle: Volc=VoC/3600fluo Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo (Table 9-2 or Eqn 9-7) gf=[Gexp(- a * (LTC — b))]-tl, gf<=g Opposing Queue Ratio: qro=1-Rpo(go/C) gq=(4.943Volc**0.762)[(gro--1.061)-tl], gq<=g gu =g-gq if gq>=gf, =g-gf if gq<gf n=(gq-gf)/2, n>=0 Ptho=1-Plto Pl-=Plt[1+{(N-1)g/(gf+gu/Ell+4.24))) Ell (Figure 9-7) E12=(1-Ptho**n)/Plto, E12>=1.0 fmin=2(1+Plt)/g or fmin=2(1+P1)/g gdiff=max(gq-gf,0) fm=[gf/g]+[gu/g][1/{1+P1(Ell-1)}], (min=fmin;max=1.00) flt=fm=[gf/g]+gdiff[l/{l+Plt(E12-1)}] +[gu/g][l/(1+Plt(Ell-1)],(min=fmin;max=1.0) or flt=[fm+0.91(N-1)]/N** flt Primary For special case of single -lane approach opposed by multilane approach, see text. * If P1>=1 for shared left -turn lanes with N>l, then assume de -facto left -turn lane and redo calculations. ** For permitted left -turns with multiple exclusive left -turn lanes, flt=fm. For special case of multilane approach opposed by single -lane approach or when gf>gq, see text. SUPPLEMENTAL UNIFORM DELAY WORKSHEET EBLT WBLT NBLT SBLT • Adj. LT Vol from Vol Adjustment Worksheet, v v/c ratio from Capacity Worksheet, X Primary phase effective green, g Secondary phase effective green, gq (From Supplemental Permitted IT Worksheet), gu Cycle length, C 120.0 Red=(C-g-gq-gu), r Arrivals: v/(3600(max(X,1.0))), qa Primary ph. departures: s/3600, sp Secondary ph. departures: s(gq+gu)/(gu*3600), ss XPerm XProt XCase Queue at begining of green arrow, Qa Queue at beginning of unsaturated green, Qu Residual queue, Qr Uniform Delay, dl DELAY/LOS WORKSHEET WITH INITIAL QUEUE Initial Dur. Uniform Delay Initial Final Initial.Lane Appr/ Unmet Unmet Queue Unmet Queue Group Lane Demand Demand Unadj. Adj. Param. Demand Delay Delay Group Q veh t hrs. ds dl sec u Q veh d3 sec d sec Eastbound Submitted into the Public 1105 in connection With Westbound itemL �—�L on Walter Foeman OPTM=D.doc City CI page 23 31 Northbound Southbound Intersection Delay 79.6 seciveh Intersection LOS E irlto reC®P the Public iter" —�L On '- �-ciV ith Walter FoeMa City CIer�4 OPTIMIZED.doc P� -1-036 • 0 APPENDIX H Corridor Analysis Subyn tied WO the Public reco�cO d i�i �n�tiorl item� c�1 0�with Walter v c/ falter Foeman City Clerk 0- 1036 0 INTRODUCTION A level of service analysis was conducted using the techniques contained in the adopted These techniques are contained in the City of Miami publication Transportation Corridors'.-' 2 Meeting the Challenge of Growth Management in Miami as.revised September,1990. In performing the analysis, of the three possible scenarios 1. avaiiable, Scenario± 2 -maximum auto was used. The level of service analysis for Park Place At Brickell is documented in Tabies 1 through 4. The Brickell Corridor was generally defined to include the area between Biscayne Bay and SW 6th Avenue south of the Miami River and north of 25th Road. Major roadways providing capacity to the corridor are: ❑ Brickell Avenue ❑ Miami Avenue ❑ NW 2nd Avenue ❑ 1-95 ❑ SE/SW 7th Street ❑ SE/SW 8th Street ❑ SE/SW 13th Street Major transit routes providing capacity to the corridor are: 1 P 9 P Y Submittec, into the ❑ Metrobus Routes 48, 95, B, 6, 8 and 24 recor publlC ❑ Metrorail item ZOnconnection on _( _ with ❑ Metromover falter F �., oeman CitY Clerk EXISTING 2000 LEVEL OF SERVICE Table 1 presents an analysis of the existing 2000 corridor level of service. Roadway vehicular capacities (column 2) were based upon data contained in Transportation Corridors: Meeting the Challenge of Growth Management in Miami as revised September 1990. Roadway vehicular volumes (column 4) were taken from Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) District 6 published 1999 Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) data. This data was adjusted to 2000 by applying a growth factor of 2% per year. These AADT volumes were adjusted to reflect peak hour conditions by applying factors contained in the FDOT publication Florida's Level of Service Standards and Guidelines Manual for Planning, also known as the FDOT 1998 LOS Manual. Roadway vehicular volumes on Miami Avenue and NW 2nd Avenue were taken from Park Place At Brickell Page 1 June 6, 2000 0 original traffic counts obtained from other studies in the Brickell Avenue area. Mass Transit . person trip capacities (columns 8, 9 and 10)were calculated from route schedules and equipment information supplied by the Miami -Dade Transit Agency (MDTA) and data contained in Transportation Corridors: Meeting the Challenge of Growth Management in Miami as revised September 1990. Average weekday .ridership data was obtained from MDTA. Total route ridership was available for Metrobus. Ridership for the section of Metrorail south of Government Station was available for Metrorail. Ridership for the Brickell leg of the Metromover was provided by MDTA. Additionally, MDTA provided an estimated percentage of person trips during the peak 4 hours of the day. Because the Metrobus data reflected ridership on the entire route, some percentage of which is typically outside of the Brickell Corridor, it was necessary to estimate the portion of the total route ridership which was actually on the buses when they were in the corridor. To facilitate this estimate of segment volumes, 1997 through 1999 data on Metrobus boardings in the corridor was obtained from Metrobus surveys. Transit volumes (column 12) were calculated using the ridership data and the percentage of passengers during the peak hours supplied by MDTA and estimating ridership in the corridor from actual load factors calculated from the Metrobus survey data. Thus, the transit -volumes shown in column 12 reflect actual load factors calculated from MDTA surveys. As can be seen from Table 1, the existing Brickell Corridor currently operates at Level of Service "K. Submitted i reconto the in con Pub/id' item ®� ection With -G d Walter l=oemcw s City Clerk Park Place At Brickell Page 2 June 6, 2000 0 0 ®1 0 3 6 0 TABLE 1 - EXISTING 2000 LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS .00 ROADWAY MODE MASS TRANSIT MODE CORRIDOR TOTALS CORRIDOR NAME 2000 ROADWAY ROADWAY ROADWAY ROADWAY ROADWAY ROADWAY LOCAL BUS EXPRS BUS RAIL TRANSIT TOTAL TOTAL TRANSIT CORRIDOR CORRIDOR CORRIDOR CORRIDOR Principal Roadway(s) CORR VEHICULAR PERSON TRIP VEHICULAR PERSON TRIP EXCESS PERSON PERSON TRIP PERSON TRIP PERSON TRIP TRANSIT TRANSIT PERSON PERSON PERSON PERSON PERSON TYPE CAPACITY CAPACITY VOLUME VOLUME PERSON TRIP TRIP CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY PERSON TRIP TRIP TRIP TRIP TRIP @ PPV = @ PPV = CAPACITY V/C LOS @ LOAD = @ LOAD = @ LOAD = @ LOAD = TRIP EXCESS CAPACITY VOLUME EXCESS V/C LOS 1.6 1.4 DESIGN DESIGN DESIGN DESIGN VOLUME CAPACITY CAPACITY (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) (15) (16) (17) BRICKELL CORRIDOR HS Brickell Avenue (550) 3,600 5,760 3,050 4,270 1,490 0.74. C 5,760 4,270 1,490 0.74 C Metrobus Rte 48 69 69 27 42 69 27 42 0.39 A Metrobus Rte 95 173 173 40 132 173 40 132 0.23 A Metrobus Rte B 552 552 186 366 552 186 366 0.34 A Brickell Avenue Subtotal 3,600 5,760 3,050 4,270 1,490 0,74 C '. 621 173 0 794 253 540 6,554 4,523 2,030 0.69 B Miami Avenue 2,720 4,352 1,142 1,599 2,753 0.37 A 4,352 1,599 2,753 0.37 A Metrobus Rte 6 138 138 19 1.19 138 19 119 0.14 A Miami Avenue Subtotal 2,720 4,352 1,142 1,599 2,753 0.37 A 138 0 0 138 19 119 4,490 1,618 2,872 0.36 A NW 2nd Avenue 2,720 4,352 724 1,014 3,338 0.23 A 4,352 1,014 3,338 0.23 A 1-95 (2162) 19,000 30,400 8,796 12,316 18,085 0.41 A. 30,400 12,315 18,085 0.41 A SE/SW 7th Street (5091) 1,438 2,300 929 1,301 999 0.57 A 2,300 1,301 999 0.67 A Metrobus Rte 8 414 414 294 120 414 294 120 0.71 C SE/SW 7th Street Subtotal 1,438 2,300 929 1,301 999 0.57 A 414 0 0 414 294 120 2,714 1,595 1,119 0.59 A SE/SW 8th Street (5090) 1,438 2,300 1,267 1,774 526 0,77 C 2,300 1,774 526 0.77 C Metrobus Rte 8 414 414 323 91 414 323 91 0.78 C SE/SW 8th Street Subtotal 1,438 2,300 1,267 1,774 526 0.77 C 414 0 0 414 323 91 2,714 2,097 617 0.77 C SE/SW 13th Street (86) 2,720 4,352 1,455 2,036 2,316 0.47 A 4,352 2,036 2,316 0.47 A Metrobus Rte 24 516 516 200 316 516 200 316 0.39 A SE/SW 13th Street Subtotal 2,720 4,352 1,455 2,036 2,316 0.47 A 516 0 0 516 200 316 4,868 2,236 2,632 0.46 A Metrorail 11,232 11,232 5,115 6,117 11,232 5,115 6,117 0.46 A Metromover 1456 1456 256 1200 1456 256 1200 0.18 A TOTAL 33,635 53,816 17,363 24,309 29,507 0.45 A 2,103 173 12,688 14,964 6,460 8,503 68,780 30,769 38,010 0.45 A is is LOS TABLE AUTO PERSON TRIPS 24,309 79.00% - 0.00 A TRANSIT PERSON TRIPS 6,480 21.00% 0.60 A TOTAL PERSON TRIPS 30,769 100.00% 0.61 B 0.70 8 0.71 C 0.80 C 0.81 D 0.90 D 0.91 E 1.00 E 1.01 F Metrobus Peak 4-Hr Period Ridership 56.00% of daily ridership Metrorail Peak 4-Hr Period Ridership 66.00% of daily ridership Metromover Peak 4-Hr Period Ridership 51.00% of daily ridership GROWTH FACTOR = 1.02 Per Year 1999 2000 K PK HR Brickell Avenue (550) AADT 32,500 33,150 0.092 3,050 Miami Avenue PK HR 1,120 1,142 1.000 1,142 NW 2nd Avenue PK HR 710 724 1.000 724 1-95 (2162) AADT 98,000 99,960 0.088 8,796 SE/SW 7th Street (5091) AADT 9,900 10,098 0.092 929 SE/SW 8th Street (5090) AADT 13,500 13,770 0.092 1,267 SE/SW 13th Street (86) AADT 15,500 15,810 0.092 1,455 17,363 TRANSIT SEGMENT FACTORS Route AM PM 48 0.24 0.14 95 0.21 0.24 Stabrnitted B s 0.6 0.46 0.95 0.40 into record in the Pub11G 8W 8E 0.25 0.66 0.60 0.19 item �Or➢')ection With on Zr�. 24 0.31 0.34 Walter Foem City Clerk Park Place At Brickell Page 3 April 10, 2000 o� 6 0 - Ue YEAR 2005 LEVEL OF SERVICE WITHOUT THE PROJECT Table 2 presents an analysis of the future year 2005 corridor level of service without the project. Roadway vehicular volumes and mass transit volumes was taken from Table 1 (1999) and adjusted to the year 2005 by applying a growth factor of 2% per year and adding committed development traffic. As can be seen from Table 2, it is estimated that the Brickell Corridor will operate at Level of Service "A" in the year 2005 without the project. Subrnitte reco d into item' in connection public m tion With Walter F oeman City Clerk Park Place At Bdckell Page 4 June 6, 2000 TABLE 2 - 2005 LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS WITHOUT PROJECT ROADWAY MODE MASS TRANSIT MODE CORRIDOR TOTALS CORRIDOR NAME • 2005 ROADWAY ROADWAY ROADWAY ROADWAY ROADWAY ROADWAY LOCAL BUS EXPRS BUS RAIL TRANSIT TOTAL TOTAL TRANSIT CORRIDOR CORRIDOR CORRIDOR CORRIDOR Principal Roadway(s) CORR VEHICULAR PERSON TRIP VEHICULAR PERSON TRIP EXCESS PERSON PERSON TRIP PERSON TRIP PERSON TRIP TRANSIT TRANSIT PERSON PERSON PERSON PERSON PERSON TYPE CAPACITY CAPACITY VOLUME VOLUME PERSON TRIP TRIP CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY PERSON TRIP TRIP TRIP TRIP TRIP @ PPV = @ PPV = CAPACITY V/C LOS :. @ LOAD = @ LOAD = @ LOAD = @ LOAD = TRIP EXCESS CAPACITY VOLUME EXCESS V/C LOS 1.6 1.4 DESIGN DESIGN DESIGN DESIGN VOLUME CAPACITY CAPACITY (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) 0 1) (12) (13) (14) (15) (16) (17) BRICKELL CORRIDOR HS Brickell Avenue (550) 3,600 5,760 3,559 4,983 777 0.87 D 5,760 4,983 777 0.87 D Metrobus Rte 48 69 69 30 39 69 30 39 0.43 A Metrobus Rte 95 173 173 45 128 173 45 128 0.26 A Metrobus Rte B 552 552 206 346 552 206 346 0.37 A Brickell Avenue Subtotal 3,600 5,760 3,559 4,983 777 0.87 D 621 173 794 280 514 6,554 5,263 1,291 0.80 C Miami Avenue 2,720 4,352 1,613 2,259 2,093 0.52 A 4,352 2,259 2,093 0.52 A Mwtrnhim Rta R 414 414 325 89 414 32b 89 U. to ___ l.: SE/SW 8th Street (5090) 1,438 2,300 1,891 2,647 (347) 1.15 F 2,300 2,647 (347) 1.15 F Metrobus Rte 8 414 414 357 57 414 357 57 0.86 D SE/SW 8th Street Subtotal 1,438 2,300 1,891 2,647 (347) 1.15 F 414 414 357 57 2,714 3,004 (290) 1.11 F SE/SW 13th Street (86) 2,720 4,352 2,098 2,937 1,415 0.67 B 4,352 2,937 1,415 0.67 B Mratrnhue Rto 94 516 516 221 295 516 221 295 0.43 _ A Metrorail 11,232 11,232 5,647 5,585 11,232 5,647 5,585 0.50 A Metromover 1,456 1,456 282 1,174_ 1,456 282 1,174 0.19 A TOTAL 33,635 53,816 20,873 29,223 24,593 0.54 A 2,103 173 12,688 14,964 7,133 7,831 68,780 36,356 32,424 0.53 A LOS TABLE AUTO PERSON TRIPS 29,223 80.38% A TRANSIT PERSON TRIPS 7,133 19.62% 0.6 A TOTAL PERSON TRIPS 36,356 100.00% 0.61 B 0.7 B 0.71 C 0.8 C 0.81 D 0.9 D 0.91 E 1 E 1.01 F GROWTH FACTOR = 1.02 Per Year 1999 2000 K PK HR 2005 Brickell Avenue (550) AADT 32,500 33,150 0.092 3,050 3,559 Miami Avenue PK HR 1,120 1,142 1.000 1,142 1,613 NW 2nd Avenue PK HR 710 724 1.000 724 836 1-95 (2162) AADT 98,000 99,960 0.088 8,796 9,712 SE/SW 7th Street (5091) AADT 9,900 10,098 0.092 929 1,165 SE/SW 8th Street (5090) AADT 13,500 13,770 0.092 1,267 1,891 SE/SW 13th Street (86) AADT 15,500 15,810 0.092 1,455 2,098 20,873 Submitted into the Public recor in connection t�h item Z-! on If-1G-ryv' x_ Walter F meo an City Clelk Park Place At Brickell r 1 ;, 6 Page 5 June 6, 2000 O u -' �I" V 6 MPROJECT TRAFFIC Table 3 presents project traffic and mass transit ridership based upon PM peak hour project traffic. The project is located in Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) 673. The cardinal distribution of the traffic within TAZ 673 was obtained from Miami -Dade County. The distribution is as follows: North -Northeast 22.68% East -Northeast 6.59% East -Southeast 0.64% South -Southeast 0.96% South -Southwest 4.76% West -Southwest 22.44% West -Northwest 18.67% North -Northwest 23.26% Using this trip distribution, the project trip assignment was determined. This is shown in Figure 1. Submitted into the public MCOA in connection with item 1 �- on Az_&, --mod Walter Foeman City Clerk Park Place At Brickell Page 6 June 6, 2000 TABLE 3 - PROJECT TRAFFIC 0 CORRIDOR NAME Principal Roadway(s) Brickell Avenue (550) Metrobus Rte 48 Metrobus Rte 95 Metrobus Rte B ROADWAY MODE _MASS TRANSIT MODE CORRIDOR TOTALS ROADWAY ROADWAY ROADWAY ROADWAY ROADWAY _ LOCAL BUS EXPRS BUS RAIL TRANSIT TOTAL TOTAL TRANSIT CORRIDOR CORRIDOR CORRIDOR CORRIDOR 2000 ROADWAY VEHICULAR PERSON TRIP VEHICULAR PERSON TRIP EXCESS PERSON PERSON TRIP PERSON TRIP PERSON TRIP TRANSIT TRANSIT PERSON PERSON PERSON PERSON TRIP PERSON TRIP CORR TYPE CAPACITY CAPACITY VOLUME VOLUME PERSON TRIP TRIP V/C CAPACITY @ LOAD = CAPACITY @ LOAD = CAPACITY @ LOAD = CAPACITY @ LOAD = PERSON TRIP TRIP EXCESS TRIP CAPACITY TRIP VOLUME EXCESS V/C PPV = @ PPV = CAPACITY DESIGN DESIGN DESIGN DESIGN VOLUME CAPACITY CAPACITY 1 6 14 . (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13)_ (14) (15) (16) (17) (1 (2) ( (4) (6) _ _ HS 3,600 5,760 31 43 5,717 0.01 69 5,760 69 43 0 5,717 69 0.01 0.01 69 173 69 173 0 1 172 173 1 172 0.00 55� 552 2 550 552 2 550 0.00 Brickell Avenue Subtotal 3 mu a iou IMo a en'A n ns 4,352 249 AUTO TOTAL VEHICLE TRIPS 337 N/A - PERSON TRIPS 472 555 TRANSIT TRIPS AS PERCENT OF TOTAL TRIPS 15.00% TOTAL TRANSIT PERSON TRIPS 83 TRANSIT ASSIGNMENT PERCENT Metrobus Rte 48 0.42% 0 Metrobus Rte 95 0.62% 1 Metrobus Rte B 2.88% 2 Metrobus Rte 6 0.30% 0 Metrobus Rte 8 WB 4.55% 4 Metrobus Rte 8 EB 5.01% 4 Metrobus Rte 24 3.09% 3 Metrorail 79.17% 66 Metromover 3.96% 3 100.00% 83.2588235294 Submitted into the pubUe. record in connect items L� on Walter Foeman City Clerk Park Place At Brickell Page 7 April 10, 2000 0 [7 • • N NM o \ \ r SW 7th St 31 SW 8th St 57 Q L Co QQ N� 70 SW 131h St Ra 9� I /0/ a ' ofi St SE 3rd St SE 4th St SE 5th St SE 6th St L-SITE BISCAYNE BAY 0 LEGEND EMMetromil Station 00 Metromover Station PM PEAK HOUR PROJECT TRAFFIC 474 PROJECT TRAFFIC (VPF) FIGURE 1 PROJECT TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT Park Place At Brickell Page 8 June 6, 2000 Project transit ridership was estimated based upon the assumption that 15% of project person trips would be by mass transit. Assignment of person trips to the various transit modes and routes was done proportionally to their existing ridership figures. As an example, since 79% of the mass transit ridership in the corridor was estimated to be on Metrorail, 79%. of the project person trips using mass transit was assigned to Metrorail. YEAR 2005 LEVEL OF SERVICE WITH THE PROJECT Table 4 presents an analysis of the future year 2005 corridor level of service with the project. Roadway vehicular volumes and mass transit volumes were determined by adding the data from Table 2 (Year 2005 Without Project) and Table 3 (Project Traffic). As can be seen from Table 4, it is estimated that the Brickell Corridor will operate at Level of Service "A" in the year 2005 with the project. • SubM/recott item ror In c Into the Q n�,ctlo4 Z Ubllo • CitY Cman erk Park Place At Brickell Page 9 June 6, 2000 0 0_ 1 3 6 TABLE 4 - 2006 LEVEL OF SERVICE WITH PROJECT ROADWAY MODE MASS TRANSIT MODE CORRIDOR TOTALS CORRIDOR NAME • 2005 ROADWAY ROADWAY ROADWAY ROADWAY ROADWAY ROADWAY LOCAL BUS EXPRS BUS RAIL TRANSIT TOTAL TOTAL TRANSIT CORRIDOR CORRIDOR CORRIDOR CORRIDOR Principal Roadway(s) CORR VEHICULAR PERSON TRIP VEHICULAR PERSON TRIP EXCESS PERSON PERSON TRIP PERSON TRIP PERSON TRIP TRANSIT TRANSIT PERSON PERSON PERSON PERSON PERSON TYPE CAPACITY CAPACITY VOLUME VOLUME PERSON TRIP TRIP CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY PERSON TRIP TRIP TRIP TRIP TRIP @ PPV = @ PPV = CAPACITY V/C LOS @ LOAD = @ LOAD = @ LOAD = @ LOAD = TRIP EXCESS CAPACITY VOLUME EXCESS V/C LOS 1.6 1.4 DESIGN DESIGN DESIGN DESIGN VOLUME CAPACITY CAPACITY (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) (15) (16) (17) BRICKELL CORRIDOR HS Brickell Avenue (550) 3,600 5,760 3,590 5,026 734 0.87 D 5,760 5,026 734 0.87 D Metrobus Rte 48 69 69 30 39 69 30 39 0.44 A Metrobus Rte 95 173 173 45 127 173 45 127 0.26 A Metrobus Rte B 552 552 208 344 552 208 344 0.38 A Brickell Avenue Subtotal 3,600 5,760 3,590 5,026 734 0.87 D 621 173 794 283 510 6,554 5,309 1 244 0.81 D Miami Avenue 2,720 4,352 1,791 2,508 1,844 0.58 A 4,352 2,508 1,844 0.58 A Metrobus Rte 8 414 414 328 86 414 328 86 0.79 C SE/SW 7th Street Subtotal 1,438 2,300 1,165 1,631 669 0.71 B 414 414 328 86 2,714 1,959 755 0.72 C SE/SW 8th Street (5090) Metrobus Rte 8 1,438 2,300 1,891 2,647 (347) 1.15 F 414 414 361 53 2,300 414 2,647 361 (347) 53 1.15 0.87 F D SE/SW 8th Street Subtotal 1,438 2,300 1,891 2,647 (347) 1.15 F 414 414 361 53 2,714 3,008 (294) 1.11 F SE/SW 13th Street (86) Metrobus Rte 24 2,720 4,352 2,115 2,961 1,391 0.68 B 516 516 223 293 4,352 516 2,961 223 1,391 293 0.68 0.43 B A SE/SW 13th Street Subtotal 2,720 4,352 2,115 2,961 1,391 0.68 8 _ _ 516 516 223 293 - 4 868 3 184 _ 1,684 _ 0.65 B Metrorail 11,232 11,232 5,713 5,519 11,232 5,713 5,519 0.51 A Metromover 1,456 1,456 286 1,170 1,456 286 1,170 0.20 A TOTAL 33,635 53,816 21,210 29,695 24,121 0.55 A 2,103 173 12,688 14,964 7,216 7,747 68,780 36,911 31,869 0.54 A LOS TABLE AUTO PERSON TRIPS 29,695 80.45% A TRANSIT PERSON TRIPS 7,216 19.55% 0.6 ® A TOTAL PERSON TRIPS 36,911 100.00% 0.61 B 0.7 B 0.71 C 0.8 C 0.81 D 0.9 D 0.91 E 1 E 1.01 F GROWTH FACTOR = 1.02 Per Year 1999 2000 K PK HR 2005 PROJECT Brickell Avenue (550) AADT 32,500 33,150 0.092 3,050 3,559 31 Miami Avenue PK HR 1,120 1,142 1,000 1,142 1,613 178 NW 2nd Avenue PK HR 710 724 1.000 724 836 1-95 (2162) AADT 98,000 99,960 0.088 8,796 9,712 111 SE/SW 7th Street (5091) AADT 9,900 10,098 0.092 929 1,165 SE/SW 8th Street (5090) AADT 13,500 13,770 0.092 1,267 1,891 SE/SW 13th Street (86) AADT 15,500 15,810 0.092 1,455 2,098 17 20,873 337 0 Subrn'tted,roco tItothe1 pahonez J On Ith MEW C!ft/ Park Place At Brickell fl Page 10 June 6, 2000 A-"'