The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutR-00-0589J-00-1130 7/11/00 RESOLUTION NO • 00-- 580 A RESOLUTION OF THE MIAMI CITY COMMISSION, WITH ATTACHMENTS, ACCEPTING THE PROPOSED BUDGET CALCULATED AND IDENTIFIED AS OPTION 3 FOR THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, FOR FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING OCTOBER 1, 2000 AND ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2001; DIRECTING THE CITY MANAGER TO SUBMIT THE PROPOSED BUDGET TO THE FINANCIAL EMERGENCY OVERSIGHT BOARD. WHEREAS, the Charter of the City of Miami requires the City Commission to approve a budget estimate of the expenditures and revenues of all departments, divisions, and offices; and WHEREAS, the estimates for the component units- Department of Offstreet parking, Miami Sports and Exhibition Authority, Bayfront Park Management Trust, Downtown Development Authority, and the Community Redevelopment Authority also have been provided; and WHEREAS, in December 1996 the City Commission entered into an Intergovernmental Cooperation Agreement with the Governor and the Financial Emergency Oversight Board; and WHEREAS, said Intergovernmental Agreement requires the City Commission to approve by vote and submit in writing a proposed AITACHMEN7 5111)). C-ORTAINDig Q, altmeT jUa19200 Resonation DEo.:.: 00— 589 budget for the upcoming fiscal year 90 days prior to the beginning of the new fiscal year, which is October 1, 2000; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. The recitals and findings contained in the Preamble to this Resolution are hereby adopted by reference and incorporated as if fully set forth in this Section. Section 2. Pursuant to the Intergovernmental Cooperation Agreement entered into on December 20, 1996 by and among the Governor and the Financial Emergency Oversight Board, and the City of Miami, the proposed budget calculated and identified as Option 3 for the City of Miami, Florida, for Fiscal Year beginning on October 1, 2000 and ending September 30, 2001, is approved. Section 3. The City Manager is hereby directed to submit the proposed budget estimate to the Financial Emergency Oversight Board. �i Page 2 of 3 00- 589 n Section 4. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its adoption and signature of the Mayor.'/ PASSED AND ADOPTED this 11th day of July , 2000.,-+ JOE CAROLLO, MAYOR ki accordance with Miami Code Sec. 2-36, since the Mayor did not indicate approval of this legislation by signino on the designated Placa provided, said legislation rtcmu becomes effective with th:_ a� ten (1 y.f, —the a of ommi9s; ftgaaft same, without the Mayor erci in a ATTEST: ti Walter J. bo , City Cledt WALTER J. FOEMAN CITY CLERK APPROVED TO ORM AND CORRECTNESS/ OF A RO VILARELLO TY ATTORNEY W4966:BSS 1� If the Mayor does not sign this Resolution, it shall become effective at the end of ten calendar days from the date it was passed and adopted. If the Mayor vetoes this Resolution, it shall become effective immediately upon override of the veto by the City Commission. Page 3 of 3 00— 5S9 CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members CAT June 23, 2000 FILE of the City Commission SUBJECT : FY 2001 Proposed Budget FROMGimeri REIFERENCES : City Manager .ENCLOSURES: RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Commission approve the attached resolution, which outlines the Administration's Budget proposed for FY 2001. The total budget is $510.7 million for less than a 1% increase. The general fund comprises $317.4 million of this total for an increase of 1.4%. Pursuant to the provisions of the Intergovernmental Agreement with the State Financial Oversight Board, an Estimating Conference was held on June 21, 2000, to review the revenue and expenditure forecasts that support the proposed budget. The estimates were approved with, a note of caution for property taxes. The property tax estimates were generated without the benefit of the preliminary estimates from the Property Appraiser. By law, the County does not have to provide the preliminary property tax (assessed valuations) estimates until July 1. Consequently, the property tax numbers will have to be refined when this information is received. BACKGROUND On June 8, 2000, the Administration presented a budget totaling $509 million. The Administration met individually with each Commissioner to discuss the contents of the proposed budget. Based on those discussions and further deliberations with staff, the Administration is proposing changes to the budget as outlined in the attachment. To summarize, no changes were made to the revenue estimates. Expenditures in the general fund decreased slightly, which increased the projected operating surplus. Additionally, budget estimates for the City's component units: Miami Sports and Exhibition Center; Community Redevelopment Authority; Bayfront Management Trust, Department of Offstreet Parking; and Downtown Development Authority have been provided. Other than cosmetic changes, no others were made. This budget, as presented, assumes the Five Year Plan assumptions: 9.5 mills operating ad valorem rate; $9 increase to the Fire Fee for residential and related increase for commercial establishments; and $20 increase in the solid waste fee. The budget also assumes that the debt service ad valorem millage rate will be below the roll back rate. During individual briefings, the Commission asked that different tax/fee scenarios be presented to accomplish the end revenue results. Given that there were a variety of proposals discussed, staff will be prepared to present various alternatives at the meeting. The budget also provides the Commission with the total "Full Time Equivalents (FTE)" position count; which accounts for temporary and part-time positions previously not reflected in the budget.' The timetable for. the remaining activities for the budget is as follows-. If you have questions, please feel free to contact me: W CAG/BH Attachment DATE,' June 29, 2000 Administration requests approval of the FY 2001 Budget for submission to the FOB. (The last day to submit the budget to the FOB is July`2, 2000, per the Interlocal Agreement) July 12, 2000 FOB meets to approve or reject the City's Proposed FY 2001 Budget. Note: The last day for. the FOB to reject the City's Proposed Budget if submitted on June 30, 2000 Meeting. July 27, 2000 City establishes and forwards to the County the tentative Ad Valorem Millage Rates (General Operating and Debt) and the'Non Ad Valorem Assessments along with dates and times for formal public hearings on the budget. Note: The rates established at this time can be lower but not higher at the conclusion of budget hearings. Sept. 14, 2000 First Public Hearing on the Budget, Millage and Non -Ad Valorem Assessments Sept. 28, 2000 Second Public Hearin re: above Oct. 12, 2000 Five Year Plan Submitted to the Cit Commission forapproval Oct. 28, 2000 Five -Year Operating and Capital Plan submitted to the FOB.. for review and approval. If you have questions, please feel free to contact me: W CAG/BH Attachment DATE,' June 29, 2000 Administration requests approval of the FY 2001 Budget for submission to the FOB. (The last day to submit the budget to the FOB is July`2, 2000, per the Interlocal Agreement) July 12, 2000 FOB meets to approve or reject the City's Proposed FY 2001 Budget. Note: The last day for. the FOB to reject the City's Proposed Budget if submitted on June 30, 2000 Meeting. July 27, 2000 City establishes and forwards to the County the tentative Ad Valorem Millage Rates (General Operating and Debt) and the'Non Ad Valorem Assessments along with dates and times for formal public hearings on the budget. Note: The rates established at this time can be lower but not higher at the conclusion of budget hearings. Sept. 14, 2000 First Public Hearing on the Budget, Millage and Non -Ad Valorem Assessments Sept. 28, 2000 Second Public Hearin re: above Oct. 12, 2000 Five Year Plan Submitted to the Cit Commission forapproval Oct. 28, 2000 Five -Year Operating and Capital Plan submitted to the FOB.. for review and approval. FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 s Senano ..Original with`Revision.:of Fire Fee Schedule OP�Ion = as n.... _ �.. Nil Rate at the Current Rate of 9.5 - - No rrullage rate increase effected 'Fire Fee at the Current Residential Rate of $55 °13225 161 871 - Continued Projected Increases of $4 in FY'02 -6 +4, ':Solid Waste Fee atthR$254 d - - - - - ContinueciProjected Increases of $20 in FY's'01 -'05 +20 +20 +20 +20 +20 :'Surplus/Deficit. - 7 804194 4 263 087 580,868<.. (6 536,638 ' 877,.848 ,.. ). ,,%t July 11, 2000 1.5 • CITY OF MIAMI FY 2001 BUDGET PRESENTATION • • �0 ,Q� �CD a 0 _ A_ �O� ® n��0 CD a=� �F CITY OF MIAMI FY 2001 BUDGET PRESENTATION • • �o cor CD n_ �MM0 :Z. -F CD CD Proposed Floor Amendments Appropriations APPROPRIATION CHANGES General Fund City Commission Non -Departmental Net G.F. Reduction From To Difference t $ 943,119 $ 926,310 $ (16, 809) 26,423,958 26,440,767 (74,682) (91,491) Note: This reduction results from a change in property tax estimates and a corresponding revenue adjustment will be made. Special Revenue Fund Police Services $ 21,858,921 $ 22,333,788 $ 474,867 July 11, 2000 2 • 0 0 C Proposed Floor Amendments Position Authorizations General Fund Perm Temp. Change F re (0.50) (0.50) Special Revenue Fund Police Services 3 (3) 0 LSF (18) (18) CD �0Er 0 ,Q C. CI P Fund �. o Disaster Recovery 0.50 0.50 0 CD c� —3 Z = * 0 July 11, 2000 3 0 C Budget ares® Fund �Q y n W*m 0 ® _ cD m � �V19� $ 313.09 $ 40.30 155.30 0.25 $ 5094 $ 511.17 0.44% July 11, 2000 4 C 0 City of Maff i Proposed Tax/Fee Chapges Included in FY 2001 Budget and Five-year Forecast [Fee/tax Ulit FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY2005 Ammval Status . I General Fund Property Tax Mills Tax rate set annually by Coarrission Will require Conor ssion Fire Fee $ per month 9 4 action Increases through 2003 Solid Waste $ per year 20 20 20 20 20 20 approved Business licenses % July 11, 2000 Will require GXmission I E 0 0 ID nCn • 9. Cr Roll Back Calculation C 00 �. �� j CD n� 0 �. CD C 3 :E Cr R6 a =T FY 2000 State Calculated Effective Millage Rates Rollback Rate Rollback Rate Operating 9.500 8.999 9.174 Debt Service 1.400 1.326 1.351 Total 10.900 10.325 10.525 Note: The calculation of an "Effective Rollback Rate" uses the City's historical experience to factor for valuation adjustments and coll4bility factors. u July 11, 2000 6 0 cr 3:3 Roll Back Comparison CD CL to 0 S. Effective Rate to Proposed -n —0 ® CD CD 0 :3 0 9.174 1.351 July 11, 2000 0 s, July 11, 2000 8 • .� 'Coo Millage lute Comparison 0@ , a 'a �i -5CD FY 2000 vs. FY 2001, CL 0 _ O O CD � 0� 0-0� =C 0CD cr PdVdaiemMIIaq9PvAm FY2000 Rmposed (Village Fates Wage Ids Dff emnoe ung 9.500 9.500 0.000 DeUsemce 1.400 1.280 -0.120 Tdal 10! 900 10! 780 4120 s, July 11, 2000 8 • ;=� Cn !CD0 n 0_� 5 CD o! CDQ '1--X_= = 0 Revenue Comparisons Difference Operating $ 118.24 $ 123.37 $ 5.13 Debt Service 18.10 16.66 (1.44) Total $ 136.34 $ 140.03 $ 3.69 Note: The figures shown are projected revenue amounts. July 11, 2000 6 • • Change in Fire Fee Methodology Impact of Commercial Properties No. of Current New S.F. Values Units Rate Rate Difference < 1,999 oCr $ 58 $ 124, $ CD CL a 2,000 - 3,499 n . a o $ 1 16 $ n n ro r 3,500 - 4,999 - $ 203 Change in Fire Fee Methodology Impact of Commercial Properties No. of Current New S.F. Values Units Rate Rate Difference < 1,999 1,814 $ 58 $ 124, $ 66 2,000 - 3,499 1,203 $ 1 16 $ 248 $ 132 3,500 - 4,999 713 $ 203 $ 435 $ 232 5,000 - 9,999 942 $ 290 $ 621 $ 331 10,00a- 19,999 443 $ 580 $ 1,242 $ 662 20,000 -29,999 110 $ 1,160 $ 2,483 $ 1,323 30,000 -39,999 .70 $ 1,740 -$ 3,725 $ 1,985 40,000 -49,999 30 $ 2,320 $ 4,966 $ 2,646 50,000 -59,999 32 $ 2,900 $ 6,208 $ 3,308 60,000 -69,999 20 $ 3,480 $ 7,450 $ 3,970 70,000 -79,999 9 $ 4,060 $ 8,691 $ 4,631 80,000 - 89,999 13 $ 4,640 $ 9,933 $ 5,293 90,000 -99,999 11. $ 5,220 $ 11,174 $ 5,954 100,000 - 124,999 19 $ 5,800 $ 12,416 $ 6,616 125,000 - 149,999 13 $ 7,250 $ 15,520 $ 8,270 150,000 - 174,999 22 $ 8,700 $ 18,624 $ 9,924 175,000 - 199,999 11 $ 10,150 $ 21,728 $ 11,578 200,000 - 224,999 59 $ 11,600 $ 24,832 $ 13,232 July 11, 2000 11 C. Cl Solid Waste Fee by Municipality (FY 2000 Rates) West Miami CD C/) Surfside �oCD� Virginia Gardens 191.56 Key Biscayne 220.00 Bay Harbor Island a EI Portal n N O Opa Locka O m nom' J -• 2D Miami 325.00 Miami Beach 325.32 City R� Solid Waste Fee by Municipality (FY 2000 Rates) West Miami 150.00 Surfside 174.00 Virginia Gardens 191.56 Key Biscayne 220.00 Bay Harbor Island 234.00 EI Portal 240.00 North Bay Village 252.00 Opa Locka 321.36 Hialeah 324.00 Miami 325.00 Miami Beach 325.32 City Optional rate for FY 2001 t Aventura 349.00 • Miami Dade County 349.00 Pinecrest 349.00 Sweetwater 349.00 Homestead 355.54 Biscayne Park 370.00 Miami Springs 371.76 North Miami Beach 397.00 North Miami 399.96 Miami Shores 420.00 � Coral Gables 498.00 July 11, 2000 12 15 14 12 City of Miami Property Tax Rates I 9 8 J& 10cl� o TO -0 r-0 r -I r..q r-4 rOwl r -I r -OI rOOO rl r-4 r..q r-0 r-� r -I N Debt Service ■ Operating 13 6D CD o Cr �- A :CD �a 00- ,o � �0 �C o _0 CD C) CD 3Q 16 15 14 12 City of Miami Property Tax Rates I 9 8 J& 10cl� o TO -0 r-0 r -I r..q r-4 rOwl r -I r -OI rOOO rl r-4 r..q r-0 r-� r -I N Debt Service ■ Operating 13 City of Mani 5 -Year Revenue Estimates by Fund and Character Reaming / Nor}Recx.ming FY 2000 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 General Fund TAXES 134,243,400 133,573,400 140,329,110 145,546,490 ' 149,702,478 152,341,224 155,050,627 UCENSESAND PERMITS 7,748,315 7,990,336 7,943,964 8,290,615 8,348,047 8,713,451 8,783,366 INTERGOVERVENTAL REVENUE 37,401,430 37,075,832 32,145,541 30,560,899 31,165,731 31,785,914 32,415,835 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 72,351,806 73,653,955 74,275,653 78,711,306 80,367,787 82,035,104 83,713,719 FINES AND FORFEITS 2,865,263 3,475,263 3,434,072 3,438,422 3,442,858 3,447,382 3,451,996 MSCELLAN OUS REVENUE 15,001,157 15,202,364 14,376,723 14,376,791 14,376,859 14,376,928 14,376,997 NON -REVENUES 13,754,057 14,021,053 13,454,694 13,456,060 13,457,427 13,458,794 13,460,163 INTE!RtA SERVICE FUNDS 29,725,363 29,710,363 31,410,199 33,759,328 34,165,225 34,578,989 35,001,085 Grdnd Total 313,090,791 314,702,566 317,369,957 328,139,912 335,026,411 340,737,785 346,253,788 EKperdtur+es 100 SAIARIES&WAGES-FIXED 162,103,866 164,423,225 169,344,270 174,564,980 183,597,369 193,104,271 203,110,749 200 FRINGE BENEFITS -FIXED 18,515,181 16,671,623 18,852,546 19,023,283 19,593,367 20,187,400 20,806,564 300 OPERATING EXPENSES -FIXED 35,412,055 35,841,318 38,739,303 39,320,393 39,910,199 40,508,852 41,116,4$5 400 OPERATING EXPENSES -VARIABLE 58,879,390 57,053,841 60,048,387 61,178,457 62,336,421 62,524,674 63,744,185 500 CAPITAL OUTLAY -VARIABLE 3,494,121 3,238,114 980,060 1,757,084 1,757,084 1,757,084 1,757,084 600 GRANTS IN AID 963,754 963,754 1,130,754 1,130,754 1,130,754 1,130,754 1,130,754 600 TRANSFERS TOOTFIERFUNDS 30,269,627 30,269,627 27,487,601 24,626,369 24,641,180 24,656,103 24,671,137 700 PRIOR YEARS APPROPRIATION 254,297 254,297 1 0 0- 0 0 0 Grand Total 309,892,291 308,715,799 316,582,921 321,601,320 332,965,374 343,869,138 356,336,958 CT7 asplus/ adt 3,198,500 5,986,767 787,036 6,538,592 2,060,037 (3,131,353) (10,083,170) Submitted into the public record in connection with item on 2 i L/crr Walter Foeman Cit.y Cleric July 11, 2000 14 • n FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 Revised Forecast with Revenue and Expenditures Changes Revenue Change Revised Property Tax Forecast (91,491) 587,333 1,663,986 3,149,365 2,§58,708 Expenditure Total Departmental Budget Changes (169,079) (516,398) (539,065) (562,855) (587,824) SurpILWDeficit 864,623 7,642,323 4,263,087 580,868 (6,536,638) Senario: Original with Revision of Fire Fee Schedule Village Rate at the Current Rate of 9.5 - - - - - No pillage rate increase expected Fire Fee at the Current Residential Rate of $55 13,225 161,871 - - - Continued Projected Increases of $4 in FY'02 -6 +4 Solid Waste Fee at the Projected Rate of $254 - - - - - Continued Projected Increases of $20 in FY's'01-'05 +20 +20 +20 +20 +20 Surplus/Deficit 877,848 7,804,194 4,263,087 580,868 (6,536,638) Senario: Fire Fee 0- $61 and Millage (& 9.4 fAllage Rate at a Reduced Rate of 9.4 (1,298,597) (1,364,038) (1;422,991) (1,470,696) (1,501,814) No pillage rate increase expected -.1 Fire Fee at the Current Residential Rate of $61 1,442,889 638,426 638,426.. 638,426 638,426 with No Increase in Future Years Anticipated Solid Waste Fee at the Projected Rate of $254 - - - - - Continued Projected Increases of $20 in FY's'01-'05 +20 +20 +20 +20 +20 Surplus/Deficit 1,008,916 6,916,711 3,478,522 (251,402) (7,400,026) r Senario: Fire Fee A- $61, Solid Waste Fee (a) 325 and Village 0 8.995 Village Rate at a Reduced Rate of 8.995 (6,557,913) (6,888,394) (7,186,103) (7,427,013) (7,584,163) No pillage rate increase expected -.505 Fire Fee at the Current Residential Rate of $61 . 1,442,889 638,426 638,426 638,426 638,426 with No Increase in Future Years Anticipated Solid Waste Fee at the Projected Rate of $325 4,471,126 4,471,126 4,471,126 4,471,126 4,471,126 Continued Projected Increases of $20 in FY's'01-'05 4% +20 +20 +20 +20 Surplus/Deficit 5,863,481 2,186,535 (1,736,593) (9,011,249) oulu220,725 rnrt ea into the public record in connection with July 11, 2000 15 item J on 7 Lr !falter Foeman _ ... City Clerk