Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutR-00-0289J-00-173 03/10/00 RESOLUTION NO. 00— 289 A RESOLUTION OF THE MIAMI CITY COMMISSION, WITH ATTACHMENT, AMENDING THE SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARKWEST DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT ("DRI") DEVELOPMENT ORDERS (RESOLUTION NOS. 88-110 AND 88-111 ADOPTED FEBRUARY 11, 1988, AS AMENDED), FOR THE SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST AREA OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A", BY AMENDING THE DEVELOPMENT ORDERS IN ORDER TO EXTEND THE BUILDOUT AND TERMINATION DATES FOR INCREMENT II;, FINDING THAT THIS CHANGE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A SUBSTANTIAL DEVIATION PER CHAPTER 380, FLORIDA STATUTES (1997); AND ALSO FINDING THAT THIS CHANGE IS IN CONFORMITY WITH THE MIAMI COMPREHENSIVE NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN 1989-2000. WHEREAS, on February 11, 1988, the City Commission adopted Resolution No. 88-110 approving a Master Development Order for the Southeast Overtown/Park West Development of Regional Impact ("DRI"); and Resolution No. 88-111 approving the Increment I Development Order for the DRI; and WHEREAS, on September 24, 1992, the City Commission adopted Resolution No. 92-609 approving the Increment II Development Orders for the DRI, and Resolution No. 93-217 approving the Increment II Development Order for the DRI; and WHEREAS, the Miami Planning Advisory Board, at its meeting held on January 19, 2000, following an advertised.public hearing, ATTACHMENT FSS CONTAINED CITY COMMISSION' MEETING O1 MAR 2 3 2000 A(�A1Resolution No. ,J�lj ` 0 �..J adopted Resolution No. PAB 06-00 by a vote of seven to zero (7-0), RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of the proposed amendments to the Increment II Development Orders for the DRI with conditions as attached hereto; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Subsection 380.06(19), Florida Statutes (1997), on December 30, 1999, the City Of Miami Department of Planning and Zoning submitted a "Notification of a Proposed Change to a Previously Approved DRI" ("NOPC"), to the City of Miami, the South Florida Regional Planning Council, and the Florida Department of Community Affairs; and WHEREAS, on March 23, 2000, the Miami City Commission held a public hearing on the proposed amendments to the Master and Increment II Development Orders for the DRI as attached hereto; and WHEREAS, the City Commission determined that all requirements of notice and other legal requirements have been complied with for an amendment to the Increment II Development Orders for the DRI; and WHEREAS, the City Commission deems it advisable and in the best public interest, and the general welfare of the City of Miami to amend the Increment II Development Orders for the DRI as hereinafter set forth; Page 2 of 4 4,093 NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. The recitals and findings contained in the Preamble to this Resolution are hereby adopted by. reference thereto and incorporated herein as if fully set forth in this Section. Section 2. The proposed amendment to the Increment II Development Orders for the Southeast Overtown/ Park West Development of Regional Impact ("DRI"'), (a) does not constitute a substantial deviation and, therefore, does not require further development of regional impact review pursuant to Subsection 380.06(19), Florida Statutes (1997); and (b) is in conformity with the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000. Section 3. The attached amendment to the Increment II Development Orders for the DRI (Exhibit "A") is hereby approved. Section 4. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its adoption and signature of the Mayor.'/ �i If the Mayor does not sign this Resolution, it shall become effective at the end of ten calendar days from the date it was passed and adopted. If the Mayor vetoes this Resolution, it shall become effective immediately upon override of the veto by the City Commission. Page 3 of 4 PASSED AND ADOPTED this 23rd day of March 2000 JOE CAROLLO, MAYOR in accordance with Miami Code Sec. 2-36, since the ayor did not indicate approval of this legislation by signing it in the des' nate p ce g rcwido said legislation . p �^r becomes effective with the elapse of ten (1 day ofrorr; the c --�� of Corr�missir" : �n regarding same, without the M Ybr Fxercisi etoh I �. ATTEST: WALTER J. FOEMAN CITY CLERK b1m W4174:GMM:eij Page 4 of 4 J. F e—pU Tity Clerk Exhibit "A" Increment II Development Order SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST INCREMENT II DEVELOPMENT ORDER PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The Project consists of development in the Southeast Overtown/Park West Community Redevelopment Area through the Year 2007, including the following land uses and increments: Increment I Increment II Increment III Buildout- Buildout- Buildout - Land uses (1988-1997) ( 1 (]nT�� 1999-2007 Totals (1992-2004) Office (gA- 166,000 337„000 500,500 1,003,500 Commercial , (gso 95,400 71,700 90,600 257,700 Hotel (rooms) 0 500 600 1,100 Residential (units) 2,000 2,000 5,000 9,000 Attract ions/Recreation (seats) 8,000 8,000 0 16,000 ACTION TAKEN: That, having made the findings of fact and reached the conclusions of law set forth above, it is ordered that Increment II of the Project is hereby approved, subject to the following conditions: THE CITY, ITS SUCCESSORS, AND/OR ASSIGNS JOINTLY OR SEVERALLY MAY ISSUE BUILDING PERMITS AND CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY FOR TOTAL ALLOWABLE DEVELOPMENT, PURSUANT TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THIS DEVELOPMENT ORDER TOGETHER WITH THE ATTENDANT MASTER DEVELOPMENT ORDER AND SHALL: 1 12. Establish the termination date for completing development as De^�� r�T9, November 30, 2004, provided that the applicant, its successors, and assigns, complies with Condition 15, herein. The termination date may only be modified in accordance with Section 380.06(19)(c) F.S. • • PZ -4 PLANNING FACT SHEET APPLICANT City of Miami Planning and Zoning Department HEARING DATE January 19, 2000 REQUEST/LOCATION Consideration of an amendment to a previously approved Development of Regional Impact (DRI) for the Southeast. Overtown/Park West Area. LEGAL DESCRIPTION Complete legal description on file with the Hearing Boards Office. PETITION Consideration of amending the Southeast Overtown/Park West Development of Regional Impact (DRI) in order to extend the buildout/termination date by 4 years and 11 months (from December 31, 1999 to November 30, 2004; finding that this change does not constitute a substantial deviation, pursuant to Chapter 380, Florida Statutes, and that the changes are in conformity with the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000. PLANNING Approval with conditions. RECOMMENDATION BACKGROUND AND The attached request is a time extension for Increment 11 of the ANALYSIS Southeast Overtown/Park West Development of Regional Impact (DRI) in order to facilitate development and redevelopment activities in this area through November 30, 2004. 1 PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD Approval CITY COMMISSION N/A APPLICATION NUMBER 2000-004 VOTE: 7-0 Item #6 ....... ................. _........................................................ _............ __........................................................ _............................................... _................. _... ._..................................................................... CITY OF MIAMI • PLANNING DEPARTMENT 444 SW 2ND AVENUE, 3RD FLOOR • MIAMI, FLORIDA, 33130 PHONE (305) 416-1400 nate: u i n 3/zuuu P. Page 1 -` X69 L ] RESOLUTION PAB -06-00 • A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A CONSIDERATION OF AMENDING THE SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN PARKWEST DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT (DRI) IN ORDER TO EXTEND THE BUILDOUT/TERMINATION DATE BY FOUR YEARS AND ELEVEN MONTHS (FROM DECEMBER 31, 1999 TO NOVEMBER 30, 2004); FINDING THAT THIS CHANGE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A SUBSTANTIAL DEVIATION, PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 380, FLORIDA STATUTES, AND THAT THE CHANGES ARE IN CONFORMITY WITH THE MIAMI COMPREHENSIVE NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN 1989-2000. HEARING DATE: January 19, 2000 ITEM NO. 6 VOTE: 7-0 ATTEST: Gelabert-Sanche ec r Planning and Zoning Department 00- 289 L] • December 30, 1999 STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS DIVISION OF RESOURCE PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT 2555 Shumard Oak Blvd.. Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2100 (904) 488-4925 NOTIFICATION OF A PROPOSED CHANGE TO A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT (DRI) SUBSECTION 380.06(19), FLORIDA STATUTES Subsection 380.06(19), Florida Statutes, requires that submittal of a proposed change to a previously approved DRI be made to the local government, the regional planning agency, and the state land planning agency according to this form. 1) I, Ana Gelabert Director, authorized representative of the City of Miami Planning and Zoning Department, hereby give notice of a proposed .change to a previously approved Development of Regional Impact in accordance with Subsection 380.06(19), Florida Statutes. In support thereof, I submit the following information concerning The Southeast Overtown Park West Development of Regional Impact, which information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. I have submitted today, under separate cover, copies of this completed notification to The City of Miami, the South Florida Regional Planning Council and to the Bureau of State Planning, Department of Community Affairs. ign ure) (Date) 2) Applicant (name, address, phone). City of Miami Planning and Zoning Department 444 SW 2"' Avenue, 3" Floor Miami, Florida 33130 Phone: (305) 416-1400 00— % ;) Authorized Agents (name, address, phone). .Joel E: ylaxwell, Esq. Ana Gelabe'rt/Lourdes Slazyk City of Miami Law Department City of Miami Planning Department 444 S.W. 2nd Avenue 444 S.W. 2nd Avenue; Ninth Floor Third Floor Miami, Florida 33130 Phone: (305) 416-1435 Phone: ,(305)416-1800 Miami, Florida. 33130 . 4) Location (Legal Description) of approved DRI and proposed change. See Legal Description attached as Exhibit "A" ' 5) Provide a complete description of the proposed change. Include any proposed changes to the plan of development, phasing, additional lands, commencement date, build out date, development order conditions and requirements, or the representations contained in either the development, order or the Application for Development Approval. Responses. A. The Master and Increment II Development Orders should' be changed as follows 1) to reflect an extension, in the Buildout Dates by approximately 4 years and 11 months 6) Indicate such changes on the project master site plan-, supplementing with other detailed maps, as appropriate. Additional information may be requested by the Department or any reviewing agency to clarify the nature of the change or the resulting impacts., No change in maps. 7) Complete the attached Substantial Deviation Determination Chart for all land use types approved in the development. If no change is proposed or has occurred, indicate no change. Response: No Change 0 . 0 8) List all the dates and resolution numbers (or other appropriate identification numbers) of all modification or amendments to the originally approved DRI development order that have been adopted by the local government, and provide a brief description of the previous changes (i.e., any information not already addressed in the Substantial Deviation Determination Chart). Has there been a change in local government jurisdiction for any portion of the development since the last approval or development order was issued? If so, has the annexing local government adopted a new DRI development order for the project? Response: Originally approved development orders: A. Master Development Order - Resolution #88-110 February 11, 1988 B. Increment I Development Order - Resolution 488-111 February 11, 1988 Modifications: C. Amendment to Increment I DO Resolution #92-607 September 24, 1992 D. Amendment to Increment I DO Resolution #92-608 September 24, 1992 E. Increment II Development Order- Resolution #92-609 September 24, 1992 F. Increment II Development Order - Resolution #93-217 March 25, 1993 See attached Composite Exhibit "B" 9) Describe any lands purchased or optioned within 1/4 mile of the original DRI site subsequent to the original approval or issuance of the DR[ development order. Identify such land, its size, intended use, and adjacent non -project land uses within % mile on a project master site plan or other map. -3- W" 289 Response: Not applicable. , 10) Indicate if the proposed change., is less than 4.0% (cumulatively with other previous changes) of any criteria listed in 380.06(19)(b), Florida Statutes. Responses Not applicable. Do you believe this notification of change proposes a change which meets the criteria of Subparagraph 380.06(19)(e)2., F.S. YES .NO' X 11) Does : the proposed change result in a change to the build out date or any phasing date of the project? If so, indicate the proposed new build out or phasing dates: Response: Yes, as follows: Increment II — November 30, 2004 12) Will the proposed change require an amendment to the local government comprehensive plan Response".' No. 13) An, updatedmaster site plan or other map, of the ',development portraying and distinguishing the proposed' changes to the previously approved DRI or development. order conditions. Response: . No.Change -4- 11 I • I4) Pursuant to Subsection 380.06(19)0, F.S., include the precise language that is being proposed to be deleted or added as an amendment to the development order. This language should address and quantify: , a. All proposed specific changes to the nature, phasing, and build out date of the development; to development order conditions and requirements; to commitments and representations in the Application for Development Approval; to the acreage attributable to each described proposed change of land use, open space, areas for preservation, green belts; to structures or to other improvements including locations, square footage, number of units; and other major characteristics or components of the proposed change; Response: See Exhibit "C" for draft of Resolution. b. An updated legal description of the property, if any project acreage is/has been added or deleted to the previously approved plan of development; Response: Not applicable. C. A proposed amended development order deadline for commencing physical development of the proposed changes, if applicable; Response: Not applicable. d. A proposed amended development order termination date that reasonably reflects the time required to complete the development; Response: Increment II — November 30, 2004 -5- 289 e. A proposed amended development order date until which the local government agrees, that the changes to the DRI shall not be subject to down -zoning, unit density reduction, or intensity reddction, if applicable; and , Response• Not applicable. f. Proposed amended development order specifications for the annual report, including the date of submission, contents,, and parties to whom the report is submitted as specified in Subsection 93-0.025 (7), F.A.C. Response: Not applicable.