HomeMy WebLinkAboutR-00-0289J-00-173
03/10/00
RESOLUTION NO. 00— 289
A RESOLUTION OF THE MIAMI CITY COMMISSION,
WITH ATTACHMENT, AMENDING THE SOUTHEAST
OVERTOWN/PARKWEST DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL
IMPACT ("DRI") DEVELOPMENT ORDERS (RESOLUTION
NOS. 88-110 AND 88-111 ADOPTED FEBRUARY 11,
1988, AS AMENDED), FOR THE SOUTHEAST
OVERTOWN/PARK WEST AREA OF THE CITY OF MIAMI,
MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A",
BY AMENDING THE DEVELOPMENT ORDERS IN ORDER
TO EXTEND THE BUILDOUT AND TERMINATION DATES
FOR INCREMENT II;, FINDING THAT THIS CHANGE
DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A SUBSTANTIAL DEVIATION
PER CHAPTER 380, FLORIDA STATUTES (1997); AND
ALSO FINDING THAT THIS CHANGE IS IN
CONFORMITY WITH THE MIAMI COMPREHENSIVE
NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN 1989-2000.
WHEREAS, on February 11, 1988, the City Commission adopted
Resolution No. 88-110 approving a Master Development Order for
the Southeast Overtown/Park West Development of Regional Impact
("DRI"); and Resolution No. 88-111 approving the Increment I
Development Order for the DRI; and
WHEREAS, on September 24, 1992, the City Commission adopted
Resolution No. 92-609 approving the Increment II Development
Orders for the DRI, and Resolution No. 93-217 approving the
Increment II Development Order for the DRI; and
WHEREAS, the Miami Planning Advisory Board, at its meeting
held on January 19, 2000, following an advertised.public hearing,
ATTACHMENT FSS
CONTAINED
CITY COMMISSION'
MEETING O1
MAR 2 3 2000
A(�A1Resolution No. ,J�lj
` 0 �..J
adopted Resolution No. PAB 06-00 by a vote of seven to zero
(7-0), RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of the proposed amendments to the
Increment II Development Orders for the DRI with conditions as
attached hereto; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Subsection 380.06(19), Florida Statutes
(1997), on December 30, 1999, the City Of Miami Department of
Planning and Zoning submitted a "Notification of a Proposed
Change to a Previously Approved DRI" ("NOPC"), to the City of
Miami, the South Florida Regional Planning Council, and the
Florida Department of Community Affairs; and
WHEREAS, on March 23, 2000, the Miami City Commission held a
public hearing on the proposed amendments to the Master and
Increment II Development Orders for the DRI as attached hereto;
and
WHEREAS, the City Commission determined that all
requirements of notice and other legal requirements have been
complied with for an amendment to the Increment II Development
Orders for the DRI; and
WHEREAS, the City Commission deems it advisable and in the
best public interest, and the general welfare of the City of
Miami to amend the Increment II Development Orders for the DRI as
hereinafter set forth;
Page 2 of 4
4,093
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF MIAMI, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The recitals and findings contained in the
Preamble to this Resolution are hereby adopted by. reference
thereto and incorporated herein as if fully set forth in this
Section.
Section 2. The proposed amendment to the Increment II
Development Orders for the Southeast Overtown/ Park West
Development of Regional Impact ("DRI"'), (a) does not constitute a
substantial deviation and, therefore, does not require further
development of regional impact review pursuant to Subsection
380.06(19), Florida Statutes (1997); and (b) is in conformity
with the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000.
Section 3. The attached amendment to the Increment II
Development Orders for the DRI (Exhibit "A") is hereby approved.
Section 4. This Resolution shall become effective
immediately upon its adoption and signature of the Mayor.'/
�i If the Mayor does not sign this Resolution, it shall become effective at
the end of ten calendar days from the date it was passed and adopted.
If the Mayor vetoes this Resolution, it shall become effective
immediately upon override of the veto by the City Commission.
Page 3 of 4
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 23rd day of March 2000
JOE CAROLLO, MAYOR
in accordance with Miami Code Sec. 2-36, since the ayor did not indicate approval of
this legislation by signing it in the des' nate p ce g rcwido said legislation . p �^r
becomes effective with the elapse of ten (1 day ofrorr; the c --�� of Corr�missir" : �n
regarding same, without the M Ybr Fxercisi etoh I �.
ATTEST:
WALTER J. FOEMAN
CITY CLERK
b1m
W4174:GMM:eij
Page 4 of 4
J. F e—pU Tity Clerk
Exhibit "A"
Increment II Development Order
SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST
INCREMENT II DEVELOPMENT ORDER
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The Project consists of development in the Southeast
Overtown/Park West Community Redevelopment Area through the Year 2007, including
the following land uses and increments:
Increment I Increment II Increment III
Buildout- Buildout- Buildout -
Land uses (1988-1997) ( 1 (]nT�� 1999-2007 Totals
(1992-2004)
Office
(gA-
166,000
337„000
500,500
1,003,500
Commercial
, (gso
95,400
71,700
90,600
257,700
Hotel
(rooms)
0
500
600
1,100
Residential
(units)
2,000
2,000
5,000
9,000
Attract ions/Recreation
(seats)
8,000
8,000
0
16,000
ACTION TAKEN:
That, having made the findings of fact and reached the conclusions of law set forth
above, it is ordered that Increment II of the Project is hereby approved, subject to the
following conditions:
THE CITY, ITS SUCCESSORS, AND/OR ASSIGNS JOINTLY OR SEVERALLY MAY ISSUE
BUILDING PERMITS AND CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY FOR TOTAL ALLOWABLE
DEVELOPMENT, PURSUANT TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THIS DEVELOPMENT
ORDER TOGETHER WITH THE ATTENDANT MASTER DEVELOPMENT ORDER AND
SHALL:
1
12. Establish the termination date for completing development as De^�� r�T9,
November 30, 2004, provided that the applicant, its successors, and assigns,
complies with Condition 15, herein. The termination date may only be modified in
accordance with Section 380.06(19)(c) F.S.
• • PZ -4
PLANNING FACT SHEET
APPLICANT City of Miami Planning and Zoning Department
HEARING DATE January 19, 2000
REQUEST/LOCATION Consideration of an amendment to a previously approved
Development of Regional Impact (DRI) for the Southeast.
Overtown/Park West Area.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION Complete legal description on file with the Hearing Boards Office.
PETITION Consideration of amending the Southeast Overtown/Park West
Development of Regional Impact (DRI) in order to extend the
buildout/termination date by 4 years and 11 months (from
December 31, 1999 to November 30, 2004; finding that this
change does not constitute a substantial deviation, pursuant to
Chapter 380, Florida Statutes, and that the changes are in
conformity with the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
1989-2000.
PLANNING Approval with conditions.
RECOMMENDATION
BACKGROUND AND The attached request is a time extension for Increment 11 of the
ANALYSIS Southeast Overtown/Park West Development of Regional Impact
(DRI) in order to facilitate development and redevelopment
activities in this area through November 30, 2004.
1
PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD Approval
CITY COMMISSION N/A
APPLICATION NUMBER 2000-004
VOTE: 7-0
Item #6
....... ................. _........................................................ _............ __........................................................ _............................................... _................. _... ._.....................................................................
CITY OF MIAMI • PLANNING DEPARTMENT
444 SW 2ND AVENUE, 3RD FLOOR • MIAMI, FLORIDA, 33130 PHONE (305) 416-1400
nate: u i n 3/zuuu
P. Page 1
-` X69
L ]
RESOLUTION PAB -06-00
•
A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A CONSIDERATION
OF AMENDING THE SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN PARKWEST
DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT (DRI) IN ORDER TO EXTEND
THE BUILDOUT/TERMINATION DATE BY FOUR YEARS AND ELEVEN
MONTHS (FROM DECEMBER 31, 1999 TO NOVEMBER 30, 2004);
FINDING THAT THIS CHANGE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A
SUBSTANTIAL DEVIATION, PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 380, FLORIDA
STATUTES, AND THAT THE CHANGES ARE IN CONFORMITY WITH
THE MIAMI COMPREHENSIVE NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN 1989-2000.
HEARING DATE: January 19, 2000
ITEM NO. 6
VOTE: 7-0
ATTEST:
Gelabert-Sanche ec r
Planning and Zoning Department
00- 289
L]
•
December 30, 1999
STATE OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS
DIVISION OF RESOURCE PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT
2555 Shumard Oak Blvd..
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2100
(904) 488-4925
NOTIFICATION OF A PROPOSED CHANGE TO A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED
DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT (DRI)
SUBSECTION 380.06(19), FLORIDA STATUTES
Subsection 380.06(19), Florida Statutes, requires that submittal of a proposed change to a
previously approved DRI be made to the local government, the regional planning agency, and the
state land planning agency according to this form.
1) I, Ana Gelabert Director, authorized representative of the City of Miami Planning and
Zoning Department, hereby give notice of a proposed .change to a previously approved
Development of Regional Impact in accordance with Subsection 380.06(19), Florida
Statutes. In support thereof, I submit the following information concerning The
Southeast Overtown Park West Development of Regional Impact, which information
is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. I have submitted today, under separate
cover, copies of this completed notification to The City of Miami, the South Florida
Regional Planning Council and to the Bureau of State Planning, Department of
Community Affairs.
ign ure) (Date)
2) Applicant (name, address, phone).
City of Miami Planning and Zoning Department
444 SW 2"' Avenue, 3" Floor
Miami, Florida 33130
Phone: (305) 416-1400
00— %
;) Authorized Agents (name, address, phone).
.Joel E: ylaxwell, Esq. Ana Gelabe'rt/Lourdes Slazyk
City of Miami Law Department City of Miami Planning Department
444 S.W. 2nd Avenue 444 S.W. 2nd Avenue;
Ninth Floor Third Floor
Miami, Florida 33130 Phone: (305) 416-1435
Phone: ,(305)416-1800 Miami, Florida. 33130 .
4) Location (Legal Description) of approved DRI and proposed change.
See Legal Description attached as Exhibit "A" '
5) Provide a complete description of the proposed change. Include any proposed changes to
the plan of development, phasing, additional lands, commencement date, build out date,
development order conditions and requirements, or the representations contained in either
the development, order or the Application for Development Approval.
Responses.
A. The Master and Increment II Development Orders should' be changed as
follows
1) to reflect an extension, in the Buildout Dates by approximately 4 years
and 11 months
6) Indicate such changes on the project master site plan-, supplementing with other detailed
maps, as appropriate. Additional information may be requested by the Department or any
reviewing agency to clarify the nature of the change or the resulting impacts.,
No change in maps.
7) Complete the attached Substantial Deviation Determination Chart for all land use types
approved in the development. If no change is proposed or has occurred, indicate no
change.
Response:
No Change
0 . 0
8) List all the dates and resolution numbers (or other appropriate identification numbers) of
all modification or amendments to the originally approved DRI development order that
have been adopted by the local government, and provide a brief description of the
previous changes (i.e., any information not already addressed in the Substantial Deviation
Determination Chart). Has there been a change in local government jurisdiction for any
portion of the development since the last approval or development order was issued? If
so, has the annexing local government adopted a new DRI development order for the
project?
Response:
Originally approved development orders:
A. Master Development Order - Resolution #88-110
February 11, 1988
B. Increment I Development Order - Resolution 488-111
February 11, 1988
Modifications:
C. Amendment to Increment I DO Resolution #92-607
September 24, 1992
D. Amendment to Increment I DO Resolution #92-608
September 24, 1992
E. Increment II Development Order- Resolution #92-609
September 24, 1992
F. Increment II Development Order - Resolution #93-217
March 25, 1993
See attached Composite Exhibit "B"
9) Describe any lands purchased or optioned within 1/4 mile of the original DRI site
subsequent to the original approval or issuance of the DR[ development order. Identify
such land, its size, intended use, and adjacent non -project land uses within % mile on a
project master site plan or other map.
-3-
W" 289
Response:
Not applicable. ,
10) Indicate if the proposed change., is less than 4.0% (cumulatively with other previous
changes) of any criteria listed in 380.06(19)(b), Florida Statutes.
Responses
Not applicable.
Do you believe this notification of change proposes a change which meets the criteria of
Subparagraph 380.06(19)(e)2., F.S.
YES .NO' X
11) Does : the proposed change result in a change to the build out date or any phasing date of
the project? If so, indicate the proposed new build out or phasing dates:
Response:
Yes, as follows: Increment II — November 30, 2004
12) Will the proposed change require an amendment to the local government comprehensive
plan
Response".'
No.
13) An, updatedmaster site plan or other map, of the ',development portraying and
distinguishing the proposed' changes to the previously approved DRI or development.
order conditions.
Response: .
No.Change
-4-
11 I
•
I4) Pursuant to Subsection 380.06(19)0, F.S., include the precise language that is being
proposed to be deleted or added as an amendment to the development order. This
language should address and quantify: ,
a. All proposed specific changes to the nature, phasing, and build out date of the
development; to development order conditions and requirements; to commitments
and representations in the Application for Development Approval; to the acreage
attributable to each described proposed change of land use, open space, areas for
preservation, green belts; to structures or to other improvements including
locations, square footage, number of units; and other major characteristics or
components of the proposed change;
Response:
See Exhibit "C" for draft of Resolution.
b. An updated legal description of the property, if any project acreage is/has been
added or deleted to the previously approved plan of development;
Response:
Not applicable.
C. A proposed amended development order deadline for commencing physical
development of the proposed changes, if applicable;
Response:
Not applicable.
d. A proposed amended development order termination date that reasonably reflects
the time required to complete the development;
Response:
Increment II — November 30, 2004
-5-
289
e. A proposed amended development order date until which the local government
agrees, that the changes to the DRI shall not be subject to down -zoning, unit
density reduction, or intensity reddction, if applicable; and ,
Response•
Not applicable.
f. Proposed amended development order specifications for the annual report,
including the date of submission, contents,, and parties to whom the report is
submitted as specified in Subsection 93-0.025 (7), F.A.C.
Response:
Not applicable.