Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
R-00-0188
J-00-115 2/17/00 • RESOLUTION NO. 0.0— 188 A RESOLUTION OF THE MIAMI CITY COMMISSION, WITH ATTACHMENTS, APPROVING WITH CONDITIONS,. A MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT. PURSUANT TO ARTICLES 13 AND 17 OF ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 11000, FOR THE BRICKELL MAIN STREET PROJECT, TO BE LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY 900 SOUTH MIAMI AVENUE, MIAMI, FLORIDA, TO BE COMPRISED OF NOT MORE THAN 288 HOTEL ROOMS, WITH ACCESSORY RECREATIONAL SPACE, 197,380 SQUARE FEET OF RETAIL AND OTHER NONRESIDENTIAL USE AND 1,040 PARKING SPACES; DIRECTING TRANSMITTAL OF THE. HEREIN RESOLUTION; MAKING FINDINGS . OF FACT AND STATING CONCLUSIONS OF LAW; PROVIDING FOR BINDING EFFECT; CONTAINING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, on November 7, 1999, the applicant, Brickell Main Street Ltd. (hereinafter referred.to as "APPLICANT"), submitted a complete Application for Major Use Special Permit for the Brickell Main Street Project (hereinafter referred to as "PROJECT") pursuant to Articles 13 and 17 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, for the property located at approximately 900 South Miami Avenue, Miami, Florida, as legally described on "Exhibit B", attached hereto and in "Exhibit A", the Development Order attached hereto; and WHEREAS, development of the PROJECT requires the issuance of a Major Use Special Permit pursuant to Article 17 of Zoning jCIITY COBOUSSION MEETING OF FES 17 2000 Resolution No. 01 1 8 8 Ordinance No. 11000, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended; and WHEREAS, the Large Scale Development Committee met on October 21, 1999, to consider the proposed PROJECT and offer its input; and WHEREAS, the APPLICANT has modified the proposed PROJECT to address the expressed technical concerns raised at said Large Scale Development Committee meeting; and WHEREAS, the Urban Development Review Board met on November 10, 1999, to consider the proposed PROJECT and recommended approval of the PROJECT; and WHEREAS, the Miami Planning Advisory Board, at its meeting held on January 19, 2000, Item No. 4, following an advertised public hearing, adopted Resolution No. PAB 04-00 by a vote of eight to zero (8-0), RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of the Major Use Special Permit Development Order as attached hereto with the exception that the conditions pertaining to the pedestrian bridge and vehicular drop-off areas be removed, as specified by the Department.of Planning and Zoning; and WHEREAS, the City Commission deems it advisable and in the best interest of the general welfare of the City of Miami to issue a Major Use Special Permit Development Order as hereinafter set forth; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA: Page 2 of 8 00— 8 Section 1. The recitals and findings contained in the Preamble to this Resolution are hereby adopted by reference thereto and incorporated herein as if fully set forth in this Section. Section 2. A Major Use Special Permit Development Order, attached hereto as "Exhibit A" and made a part hereof, is hereby approved subject to the conditions specified in said Development Order, per Article 17 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, for the Brickell Main Street Project (hereinafter referred to as the "PROJECT") to be developed by Brickell Main Street, Ltd., ("APPLICANT"), at approximately 900 South Miami Avenue, Miami, Florida, more particularly described on "Exhibit B", attached hereto and made a part hereof. Section 3. The PROJECT is hereby approved for the construction of up to 288 hotel rooms, with accessory recreational space, 197,380 square feet of retail and other nonresidential uses and 1,040 parking spaces. Section 4. The Major Use Special Permit Application for the PROJECT also encompasses the lower ranking Special Permits as set forth in the Development Order, attached as "Exhibit A" hereto and incorporated herein. Section 5. The findings of fact set forth below are hereby made with respect to the subject PROJECT: Page 3 of 8 0— 180 a. The PROJECT is in conformity with the adopted Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000, as amended. b. The PROJECT is in accord with the SD -7 Zoning classifications of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended. C. Pursuant to Section 1305 of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, the specific site plan aspects of the PROJECT, i.e., ingress and egress, parking, signs and lighting, utilities, drainage, preservation of natural features and control of potentially adverse effects generally, have been considered and will be further considered administratively during the process of issuing a building permit and a certificate of occupancy. d. Phase I of the PROJECT is expected to cost approximately $63.7 million, and to employ approximately 300 workers during construction 0 (FTE); the PROJECT will also result in the creation of approximately 200 permanent new jobs. Phase II of the PROJECT is expected to cost approximately $72.5 million, and to employ approximately 300 workers during construction (FTE). Phase I of the PROJECT will generate approximately $1.3 million annually in tax 0'0— ISS Page 4 of 8 revenues to local units of government; and Phase II will generate approximately $1.5 million annually (1999 dollars). e. The City Commission further finds that: (1) the PROJECT will have a favorable impact on the economy of the City; (2) the PROJECT will efficiently use public transportation facilities; (3) any potentially adverse effects of the PROJECT will. be mitigated through compliance with the conditions of this Major Use Special Permit; (4) the PROJECT will favorably affect the need for people to find adequate housing reasonably accessible to their places of employment; , (5) the PROJECT will efficiently use necessary public facilities; (6) the PROJECT will not negatively impact the environment and natural resources of the City; (7) the PROJECT will not adversely affect living conditions in the neighborhood; (8) the PROJECT will not adversely affect public safety; 1. Page 5 of 8 Go- 188 (9) based on the record presented and evidence presented, the public welfare will be served by the PROJECT; and (10) any potentially adverse effects of the PROJECT arising from safety and security, fire protection and life safety, solid waste, heritage conservation, trees, shoreline development, minority participation and employment, and minority contractor/subcontractor participation will be mitigated through compliance with the conditions of this Major Use Special Permit. Section 6. The Major Use.Special Permit, as approved and amended, shall be binding upon the APPLICANT and any successors in interest. Section 7. The application for Major Use Special Permit, which was submitted on November 7, 1999, and on file with the Department of Planning and Zoning.of the City Of Miami, Florida, shall be relied upon generally for administrative interpretations and is made a part hereof by reference. Section 8. The City Manager is hereby directed to instruct the Director of the Department of Planning and Zoning to transmit a copy of this Resolution and attachment to the developers: Vicky Garcia -Toledo, Esq. on behalf of Brickell Main Street Ltd., 2500 First Union Financial Center, 200 South Biscayne Boulevard, Miami, F1. 33131-2336. Page 6 of 8 i1 Section 9. The Findings of Fact and. Conclusions of Law are made with respect to the PROJECT as described in the Development Order for the Brickell Main Street Project, which is attached hereto as "Exhibit A" and made a part hereof by reference. Section 10. The Major Use Special Permit Development Order for the Brickell Main Street Project ("Exhibit A") is hereby granted and issued. Section ll. In the event that any portion or section of this .Resolution or the Development Order ("Exhibit A") is determined to be invalid, illegal, or unconstitutional by a court or agency of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall in no manner affect the remaining portions of this Resolution or Development Order ("Exhibit A") which shall remain in full force and effect. Section 12. The provisions approved for this Major Use Special Permit, as approved, shall commence and become operative thirty (30) days after the adoption of the herein Resolution. Section 13. This Major Use Special Permit, as approved, shall expire two (2) years from its commencement and operative date. Section 14. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its adoption and signature of the Mayor Y �i If the Mayor does not sign this Resolution, it shall become effective at the end of ten calendar days from the date it was passed and adopted. If the Mayor vetoes this Resolution, it shall become effective immediately upon override of the veto by the City Commission. Page 7 of 8 00— 188 �! 0 PASSED AND ADOPTED this 17th day of February 2000. JOE CAROLLO, MAYOR In accordance with Miami Code Sec. 2-36, since the Mayor did not indicate approval of this legislation by signing it in becomes effective with the elap regarding same, without the Me ATTEST: WALTER J. FOEMAN CITY CLERK -o-n APPROVED S TOAOI AND CORRECTNESS :Z/ W4124:gAIM:eij :RCL:BSS Page 8 of 8 "EXHIBIT A" ATTACHMENT TO RESOLUTION NO. 00-188 DATE: February 17, 2000 BRICKELL MAIN STREET PROJECT MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT DEVELOPMENT ORDER Let it be known that pursuant to Articles 13 and 17 of Ordinance No. 11000, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended, the Commission of the City of Miami, Florida, has considered in a public hearing, the issuance of a Major Use Special Permit for the Brickell Main Street Project (hereinafter referred to as the "PROJECT") to be located at approximately 900 South Miami Avenue, Miami, Florida; see legal description on "Exhibit B", attached hereto and made a part hereof; said legal description is subject to any dedications, limitations, restrictions, reservations or easements of record. After due consideration of the recommendations of the Planning Advisory Board and after due consideration of the consistency of this proposed development with the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan, the City Commission has approved the PROJECT, and subject to the following conditions approves the Major Use Special Permit and hereby issues this Permit: Page 1 of 9 FINDINGS OF FACT PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The proposed Brickell Main Street Project is a hotel/mixed use development to be located at approximately 900 South Miami Avenue, Miami, Florida; ("PROJECT"). The PROJECT is located on a gross lot area of approximately 5.7 acres and a net lot area of approximately 4.1 acres of land (more specifically described on "Exhibit B", incorporated herein by reference). The remainder of the PROJECT's VITAL DATA is attached hereto as "EXHIBIT C", and incorporated herein by reference. The proposed PROJECT will consist of no more than 288 hotel rooms with accessory recreational space, 197,380 square feet of retail and other nonresidential uses. The PROJECT will also provide a total of 1,040 parking spaces. The ownership, operation and maintenance of common areas and facilities will be by the property owner or (in the case of the property being converted to condominiums) a mandatory property owner association in perpetuity pursuant to a recorded Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions. The Major Use Special Permit Application for the Brickell Main Street Project also encompasses the following lower ranking Special Permits and Variance: CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 906.6 for active recreational facilities (including a swimming pool); Page 2 of 9 .� CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT to permit staging and parking during construction (to be approved prior to obtaining a building permit from Planning); CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT for Development Signs when combined with construction signs; CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT to waive certain requirements of Brickell Promenade Design Development Plan and Urban Guidelines and parking guides and standards; CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 6, Section 607.3.1 for development of new construction within the Special District; CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 6, Section 607.3.1 for a temporary construction fence; CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 6, Section 607.3.1 for a temporary construction trailer; CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 15 for uniform signage guides and standards; CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 923 for reduction in loading berth dimensions; Special Exception as per Article 6,- Sec. 607 to allow bar/lounge open to the public within the SD -7 District; Special Exception as per Article 6, Sec. 607 to allow valet parking for hotel; Variance for street side and upper level. setbacks (as set forth in the plans on file); and Page 3 of 9 �. `" Certificate of Appropriateness for ground disturbing activity in an archeological conservation area; Waiver from the City Commission for the following: 1. Noise Ordinance during the required concrete pours for construction of the building. 2. Pedestrian Bridge over South Miami Avenue. Pursuant to Articles 13 and 17 of Zoning Ordinance 11000, approval of the requested Major Use Special Permit shall be considered sufficient for the subordinate permits requested and referenced above as well as any other special approvals required by the City which may be required to carry out the requested plans. The PROJECT shall be constructed substantially in accordance with plans and design schematics on file prepared by Beame Architectural Partnership, dated November 1999; the landscape plan shall be implemented substantially in accordance with plans and design schematics on file prepared by Ecoplan,- dated November 1999; said design and landscape plans may be permitted to be modified only to the extent necessary to comply with the conditions for approval imposed herein; all modifications shall be subject to the review and approval of the Director of the Department of Planning and Zoning prior to the issuance of any building permits. Page 4 of 9 A. . I The PROJECT conforms to the requirements of the SD -7 Zoning District, as contained in Ordinance No. 11000, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended. The existing comprehensive plan future land use. designation of Restricted Commercial, on the subject property, allows the proposed mix of commercial and hotel uses. CONDITIONS THE APPLICANT, ITS SUCCESSORS, AND/OR ASSIGNS, JOINTLY OR SEVERALLY, PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF ANY BUILDING PERMITS, SHALL COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING: 1. Meet all applicable building codes, land development regulations, ordinances and other laws. 2. Pay all applicable fees due prior to the issuance of a building permit; and pay DRI fees required to reserve development credits within 60 days of the effective date of this Resolution. 3. Allow the Miami Police Department to conduct a security survey, at the option of the Department, and to make recommendations concerning security measures and systems; further submit a report to the Department of Planning and Zoning, prior to commencement of construction, demonstrating how the Police Department recommendations, if any, have been incorporated into the PROJECT security and construction plans, or demonstrate to the Planning Director why such recommendations are impractical. 4. Obtain approval from, or provide a letter from the Department of Fire -Rescue indicating APPLICANT'S Page 5 of 9 - 188 coordination with members of the Fire Plan Review Section at the Department of Fire -Rescue in the review of the scope of the PROJECT, owner responsibility, building development process and review procedures, as well as specific requirements for fire protection and life safety systems, exiting, vehicular access and water supply. 5. Obtain approval from, or provide a letter of assurance from the Department of Solid Waste that the PROJECT has addressed all concerns of the said Department prior to the obtainment of a shell permit. 6. Prepare a Minority Participation and Employment Plan (including a Contractor/Subcontractor Participation Plan) to be submitted to the City's Director of Equal Employment Opportunity for review and comments, with the understanding that the APPLICANT must use its best efforts to follow the provisions of the City's Minority/Women Business Affairs and Procurement Program as a guide. 7. Record the following in the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, prior to the issuance of a shell permit: (a) a Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions providing that the ownership, operation and maintenance of.all common areas and facilities will be by the property owner or a mandatory property owner association in perpetuity; (b) a certified copy of the development order specifying that the Development Order runs with the land and is binding on the APPLICANT, its successors, and assigns, jointly or severally. 8. Prior to the issuance of a shell permit, demonstrate to the City that the PROJECT has either: (a) completed its condominium requirements and has been approved for such by the State of Florida; or (b) provide the City with an executed, recordable unity of title or covenant in -lieu of Page 6 of 9 till unity of title agreement for the subject property; said agreement shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Attorney's Office. 9. Provide the Department of Public Works with plans for proposed sidewalk and swale area improvements for its review and approval prior to the issuance of a building permit. 10. Provide the Department of Planning and Zoning with a temporary parking plan which addresses construction employee parking during the construction period; said plan shall be subject to the review and approval by the Department of Planning and Zoning prior to the issuance of any building permits. 11. Pursuant to the Departments of Fire -Rescue and General Services Administration, the roof area of the proposed structure shall be made available to the City of Miami for any necessary communications equipment at no charge to the City. 12. The applicant shall retain the services of an archeological consultant who will be responsible for conducting archeological monitoring of all ground disturbing activity as well as the subsequent recovery of artifacts. Said consultant shall work at the direction of the Miami -Dade County Archeologist and shall provide reports to both that office and to the City. 13. Pursuant to the findings by the Department of Planning and Zoning pertaining to the incompatibility of the proposed pedestrian bridge, the pedestrian bridge depicted over South Miami Avenue (as Phase III of this project) shall be eliminated. Page 7 of 9 U" Is -8 14. The APPLICANT shall work with the staff of the Department of Planning and Zoning to locate the three (3) vehicular drop- off areas (two along Southwest loth Street, and one along Southwest 9th Street) so that any impact on South Miami Avenue, from the drop-off area closest to South Miami Avenue, is minimized. THE CITY.SHALL: Establish the operative date of this Permit as being thirty (30) days from the date of its issuance; the issuance date shall constitute the commencement of the thirty (30) day period to appeal from the provisions of the Permit. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW The Brickell Main Street Project, proposed by the applicant, Brickell Main Street, Ltd., ("APPLICANT"), complies with the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000, is consistent with the orderly development and goals of the City of Miami, and complies with local land development regulations and further, pursuant to Section 1703 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000: (1) the PROJECT will have a favorable impact on the economy of the City; and (2) the PROJECT will efficiently use public transportation facilities; and (3) the PROJECT will favorably affect the need for people to find adequate housing reasonably accessible to their places of employment; and Page 8 of 9. 6.0— 1-88 • • (4) the PROJECT will efficiently use necessary public facilities; and (5) the PROJECT will not negatively impact the environment and natural resources of the City; and (6) the PROJECT will not adversely affect public safety; and (7) the public welfare will be served by the PROJECT; and (8) any potentially adverse effects of the PROJECT will be mitigated through conditions of this Major Use Special Permit. The proposed development does not unreasonably interfere with the achievement of the objectives of the adopted State Land Development Plan applicable to the City of Miami. Pursuant to Section 1305 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, the specific site plan aspects of the PROJECT i.e., ingress and egress, offstreet parking and loading, refuse and service areas, signs and lighting, utilities, drainage and control of potentially adverse effects generally have been considered and will be further considered administratively during the process of issuing individual building permits occupancy. Page 9 of 9 and certificates of 61.6 �� EXHIBIT "B" Lot 1, less'the West SO feet thereof, and the South 5, of Lot 2, less the West 50 feet thereof, in Block7?,-af South. City of Miami, according to the Plat thereof, as'recorded in Plat Book "B" at Page 41, of the Public Records of i'vfiami-Dade County; 916-918 S.E. Miami Avenue; Folio #01-0207-020-1010 Lot 13, Block 7 !of South, City of Miami according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in'P;a: Book- "B" at Page 41, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County; . 55 S.W. 10 Street; Folio #01-0207-010-1200 The North half ('/z) of Lot 2, less the West 50 feet thereof, and all of Lot 3, less the West 50 feet thereof in Block 72, South, City of Miami, according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book "B" at Page 41, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County; 900 S.E. Miami Avenue Rd; Folio # 01-0207 -020-1030 Lots 5, 6, 7, 9, 16, all of Lots 17 and 20, Block 71, City.of Miami South, Plat Book"B", Page 41; 36 S.W. 9 Street; Folio #01-0207-010-1050 50 S.W. 9 Street; Folio #01-0207-010-1060 62-64 S.W. 9 Street; Folio #01-0207-010-1080 59 S.W. 10 Street; Folio #01-0207-010-1180 57 S.W. 10 Street; Folio #01-0207-010-1190 29 S.W. 10 Street; Folio #01-0207-010-1220 West 75 feet of Lot 9 and an undivided one-half ('/z) interest in Lot 9 less the West 75 feet thereof, Block 72, South, City of Miami, Plat Book "B" at Page 41; 926 -928. S.E. 1" Avenue; Folio # 01-0207-020-1100 Lot 21, in Block 71 of S. of MAP OF MIAMI CO., FLA, a subdivision, according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book B at Page 41 of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida; 25 S.W. 10 Street; Folio #01-0207-010-1230 Lot 8, Block 71, South, City of Miami, according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book "B" at Page 41 of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida; 60 S.W. 9 Street; Folio #01-0207-010-1070 Lot 4, Block 71, South, City of Miami according to the Plat Bok thereof, as recorded in Plat Book B, Page 41, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida 26 S.W. 9 Street; Folio #01-0207-010-1040 The East 26.5 feet of Lot 15, Block 71 South, City of Miami according to the Plat Bok thereof, as recorded in Plat Book B, Page 41, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida a EXHIBIT �"C„� ' L BRICKELL NLaLN STREET Project Data Sheet • S.ITE: Souw :Miami Avenue between S.'ay. 9= and iv' Street Miami. Florida • LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See Exhibit ” A " under .Article 1 • SITE ZONING: SD -7 As described by Article VI, Sec. 607 (SD -7 Central Brickell Rapid Transit Commercial -Residential District) of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida. • PERNUTTED USES: As described by Article VI, Section 607 (SD -7 Central Brickell Rapid Transit Commercial -Residential Dista:,,`, ,:,f the Zonina, Ordinance for the City of Miami, Florida, the permitted uses include but are not limited to retail establishments along ground floor ofpedestrian streets; multiple dwellings; hotels; and parking • DENSITY: Residential Density for Hotel Uses As per Article VI, Sec. 607, the number of dwellings is determined by a maximum net density of 500 units per acre. Allowed: 5.7 acres x 500 units per acre = 2,850 units maximum) Proposed: 288 Hotel Units (equivalent to 144 residential units) • NET LOT AREA: 180,436 s.f. or 4.1 acres • GROSS LOT AREA: 247,470 s.f. or 5.7 acres. • BUILDING FOOTPRINT: Max Permitted: As described in Article VI Sec. 607: Unlimited Proposed: 110,380 s.f. GADMS\71343\ 12084\0262688.01 10/ 12/ I QW) • F., R.: Max. Permitted: For Residential: For Non -Residential As described in Article `'1. Sec. 6()? As described in Article `'I. Sec. 60' Base F.A.R. 6.0 times the gross lot area: Base FAR 2.25 times the gross lot area: 247.47n s.f. x 6.0= 1.=184.320 s.f. 2-177,170 s.+ x' 25= 556.880 s.f. For Hotel For Non -Residential Proposed. 197,560 s.f. rrupused:197,380 s.f. • OPEN SPACE: Nfinimum Required: As required by Article VI, Sec. 607 - 3468 sq. feet Proposed: 24,100 s.f. • SET13ACKS: Required: As required by Article VI, Sec. 607, the minimum setbacks are as follows: Front: S. Miami Avenue - 12'-0" Side: 10 Street - 12'-0" Side: 9 Street - 15'-0" Side:. SE In Street - 15'-0" Provided: Front: S. Miami Avenue - 12'-0" Side: 10 Street - 17'-0" Side: 9 Street - 5'-0" Side SE 1st Avenue - 15'-0" Variance will be requested as part of this Major Use Special Permit application for setbacks on 9 Street and setback for garage above 48'-0" of elevation • PARKING: Required: As required by Article VI, Sec. 607 and Article 9'' Section 9.17, 918, 922 and 923 of the Zoning Ordinance of City of Miami, Florida, the amount of required parking is as follows: Proposed: 1,040 parking spaces, inclusive of 21 spaces for the physically disabled. • OFFSTREET LOADING Required: As required by Article IX, Sec. 923, offstreet loading requirements for buildings in excess of 25,000 s.f. and up to 500,000 s.f. of gross building area the number of required berths shall be as follows: M4 Berth h Berth minimum dimension 12'x 35' Number of berths required - 4 Proposed: 2 berths at 12' x 35' 2 berth at 10' x 25' (market service) ( iADMS\72343\ 12084\0262688.01 10/13/1999 0 188 d Allo%ved: unlimited Proposed : Retail: 3 levels 30'-0" Hotel: 12 levels 130"-0" Upper Parking: 7 levels 63'-0" Suberade Parking: I level 9'-0" Ow G:\DMS\72343112084\026268S-01 10/12/1999 1 • PZ -2 PLANNING FACT SHEET APPLICANT Vicky Garcia -Toledo for Brickell Main Street, Ltd. HEARING DATE January 19, 2000 REQUEST/LOCATION Consideration of a Major Use Special Permit for the Brickell Main Street Project located on the property between SW/SE 91 and 10"' Street along South Miami Avenue. LEGAL DESCRIPTION Complete legal description on file with the Hearing Boards Office. PETITION Consideration of approving a Major Use Special Permit for the Brickell Main Street Project located on the property between 9l' and 1011' Street along South Miami Avenue in order to allow a Mixed Use Development consisting of 288 hotel rooms (with accessory recreational uses), 197,380 square feet of retail and other nonresidential uses and 1,040 parking spaces. PLANNING Approval with conditions. RECOMMENDATION BACKGROUND AND Please see attached analysis. ANALYSIS PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD Approval VOTE: 8-0 CITY COMMISSION N/A APPLICATION NUMBER 2000-002 Item #4 ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... CITY OF MIAMI • PLANNING DEPARTMENT 444 SW 2ND AVENUE, 3R0 FLOOR • MIAMI, FLORIDA, 33130 PHONE (305) 416-1400 ... _.................... ............................................----- ..-------- - -- ---- Date: 01/03/2000 Page 1 o0— 188 8 0 Analysis for major Use Special Permit for the BRICKELL MAIN STREET PROJECT located at 900 South Miami Avenue CASE NO. 2000-002 Pursuant to Ordinance 11000, as amended, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, the subject proposal for the Brickell Main Street Project has been reviewed to allow a Major Use Special Permit. This Permit also includes the following requests: CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 906.6 for active recreational facilities (including a swimming pool); CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT to permit staging and parking during construction (to be approved prior to obtaining a building permit from Planning); CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT for Development Signs when combined with construction signs; CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT to waive certain requirements of Brickell Promenade Design Development Plan and Urban Guidelines and parking guides and standards; CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 6, Section 607.3.1 for development of new construction within the Special District; CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 6, Section 607.3.1 for a temporary construction fence; CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 6, Section 607.3.1 for a temporary construction trailer; CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 15 for uniform signage guides and standards; CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 923 for reduction in loading berth dimensions; Special Exception as per Article 6, Sec. 607 to allow bar/lounge open to the public within the SD -7 District; HIMMM041 Special Exception as per.Article 6, Sec. 607 to allow valet parking for hotel; Variance for street side and upper level setbacks (as set forth in the plans on file); and Certificate of Appropriateness for ground disturbing activity in an archeological conservation area Waiver from the City Commission -for the following: 1. Noise Ordinance during the required concrete pours for construction of the building. 2. .pedestrian bridge across South Miami Avenue Pursuant to Articles 13' and 17 of Zoning Ordinance 11000, approval of the requested Major Use Special Permit shall be considered sufficient for the subordinate permits requested and referenced above as well as any other special approvals required by the City which may be required to carry out the requested plans. The requested Special Permit is for the purpose of allowing a hotel/mixed use development. The project consists of 175,500 sq. ft. of retail and restaurant use and a total of 288 hotel rooms, with 1,040 parking spaces, for the property located at approximately 900 South Miami Avenue within the. Brickell area (see attached legal description, location maps and aerial photographs for exact, property boundaries). In determining the appropriateness of the proposed project, the Planning and Zoning Department has referred this project to the Large Scale, Development Committee (LSDC), the City of Miami Preservation Officer, and the Urban Development Review Board (UDRB) for additional input and recommendations; the following findings have been made: • It is found that the proposed retail and hotel development project will benefit the Downtown District by creating a new hotel use in the Central Brickell area to serve Downtown area business travelers and visitors. •. It is .found that the subject property has.convenient access to public transit that makes it ideally suited for hotel. and retail as a mixed use to serve the downtown area. • It is found that ;the proposal includes a Phase III which consists of a pedestrian bridge over South Miami Avenue to link the two blocks in question. The Planning and Zoning Department contends that pedestrian bridges, such as the one proposed are not appropriate in urban settings such, as the Central Brickell, or SD -7 District. A pedestrian bridge will. discourage pedestrian activity at the ground level which is critical to the success of an urban area; this is inconsistent with the "Brickell Village" concept which is envisioned for this area. • It is found that per the Fire and GSA Departments of the City, the roof of the proposed structure may be required for communications equipment to serve the City; this are should be made available for said use at no charge to the City. • It is found that the project was reviewed by the City of Miami Preservation Officer and that a recommendation was made that archeological monitoring be conducted in the manner set forth in the condition described below. • It is found that the project was reviewed by the Large Scale Development Committee on October 21, 1999 and has been modified to address the expressed technical concerns raised at said Large Scale Development Committee meeting; however, additional design details related to sidewalk and swale area improvements will have to be submitted at the time of permitting. • It is found that the UDRB has recommended approval of the proposed project pursuant to a public meeting held on November 10, 1999. • It is found that the project depicts a total of 3 vehicular drop off areas to serve the project. One of these is on SW 9`h Street (serving the retail component of the project); and the other two are on SW 10' Street (one of which serves just the hotel, and the other serves the retail component of the project). Being that SW 10' Street is a designated Primary Pedestrian Pathway, the department contends that providing 2 drop off areas on SW 10th Street is excessive and will detract from the pedestrian character anticipated for that street. The project does not require 3 drop off areas in total. The drop off area serving the retail component of the project located along SW 10' Street should be eliminated so that addition on -street parking may be provided to serve the project. • It is found that the narrow width of subject property is a substantial hardship which limits reasonable use of the property and therefore justifies the requested setback variances. The special conditions attached to the subject property that justify the requested variances are the property's narrow width in conjunction with its Special SD -7 Zoning classification. If the setbacks were to be provided, the project would lose the necessary efficiency in its parking areas due to insufficient space for an efficient layout. If the upper level setbacks were to be provided, the size of the property would cause a final design solution which would put a hardship on reasonable use of the higher portions of the property. ®. i • It is found that the requested ground level setback variance will also allow the project to comply with the intent of the "Brickell Promenade" Guides and Standards which encourage pedestrian friendly design along SW 10`h Street. • It is found that the setback variance is being requested in order to develop a project which can provide an effective parking garage, along with ground level pedestrian activities, and a hotel tower above. • It is found that the proposed project offers the most reasonable solution to the design problem facing this particular site. • It is found that upon referral of the proposed project to Public Works and the Downtown NET Office,'the following comments were received: 1. Pursuant to the Department of Public Works, the project requires plans for proposed sidewalk and swale area improvements prior to the issuance of a building permit; and 2. Pursuant to the Downtown NET Office, the applicant shall submit a parking plan for construction employees and temporary parking arrangements for the existing building while the new building is under construction; said parking plan shall be subject to the review and approval by .the Department of Planning and Zoning prior to the issuance of any building permits. • It is found that the Department of Planning and Zoning is in concurrence with these comments and will require compliance with the above referenced conditions prior to the issuance of any building permits for the proposed project. • It is found that with respect to all additional criteria as specified in Section 1305 of Zoning Ordinance 11000, the proposal has been reviewed and found to be adequate. Based on these findings, the Department of Planning and Zoning is recommending approval of the requested Development Project with the following conditions: 1. The approval of this Major Use Special Permit shall be subject to the recordation of the following documents prior to the issuance of any building permits for the proposed project: (a) Unity of Title or covenant in lieu thereof providing that the ownership, operation and maintenance of all common areas and facilities will be by the property owner or a mandatory property owner association in perpetuity or completion of the State of Florida condominium process which assures the same compliance. 0ins • • (b) Development Order specifying that the Development Order runs with the land and is binding on the Applicant, it successors and assigns, jointly or severally. 2. Pursuant to the Department of Public Works, the property requires plans for proposed sidewalk and swale area improvements prior to the issuance of a building permit. 3. Pursuant to the findings above, the pedestrian bridge depicted over South Miami Avenue (as Phase III of this project) shall be eliminated. 4. Pursuant to the findings herein regarding the proposed vehicular drop off areas, the drop off area serving the retail component of the project located along S.W. 10"' Street should be eliminated so that addition on -street parking may be provided to serve the project. 5. Pursuant to the Fire and GSA Departments, the roof area of the proposed structure shall be made available to the City of Miami for any necessary communications equipment at no charge to the City. 6. Submittal of a parking plan for construction employees while the new build-. ing is under construction; said parking plan shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning Department prior to the issuance of any building permits. 7. The applicant shall retain the services of an archeological consultant who will be responsible for conducting archeological monitoring of all ground disturbing activity as well as the subsequent recovery of artifacts. Said consultant shall work at the direction of the Dade County Archeologist and shall provide reports to both that office and to the City. 8. The applicant shall submit a final revised landscape plan with all specifications for the review and approval of the Planning Department prior to the issuance of a building permit. 9. This approval shall also be subject to all additional conditions as specified in the attached Development Order. 00— 188 • RESOLUTION PAB -04-00 A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT FOR THE BRICKELL MAIN STREET PROJECT LOCATED APPROXIMATELY ON THE PROPERTY BETWEEN SW/SE 91"H AND 10"H STREET ALONG SOUTH MIAMI AVENUE, IN ORDER TO ALLOW A MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT CONSISTING OF 288 HOTEL ROOMS (WITH ACCESSORY RECREATIONAL USES), 197,380 SQUARE FEET OF RETAIL AND OTHER NONRESIDENTIAL USES, AND 1,040 PARKING SPACES, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS BY THE DEPARTMENT PLANNING AND ZONING: 1) THE APPROVAL OF THIS MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT SHALL BE SUBJECT TO THE RECORDATION OF THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF ANY BUILDING PERMITS FOR THE PROPOSED PROJECT: a) UNITY OF TITLE OR COVENANT IN LIEU THEREOF PROVIDING THAT THE OWNERSHIP, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF ALL COMMON AREAS AND FACILITIES WILL BE BY THE PROPERTY OWNER OR A MANDATORY PROPERTY OWNER ASSOCIATION IN PERPETUITY OR COMPLETION OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CONDOMINIUM PROCESS WHICH ASSURES THE SAME COMPLIANCE. b) DEVELOPMENT ORDER SPECIFYING THAT THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER RUNS WITH THE LAND AND IS BINDING ON THE APPLICANT, ITS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, JOINTLY OR SEVERALLY. 2) PURSUANT TO THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, THE PROPERTY REQUIRES PLANS FOR PROPOSED SIDEWALK AND SWALE AREA IMPROVEMENTS PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT. 3). PURSUANT TO THE FIRE AND GSA DEPARTMENTS, THE ROOF AREA OF THE PROPOSED STRUCTURE SHALL BE MADE AVAILABLE TO THE, CITY OF MIAMI FOR ANY NECESSARY COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT AT NO CHARGE TO THE CITY. 4): SUBMITTAL .OF A PARKING PLAN. FOR CONSTRUCTION EMPLOYEES WHILE THE NEW BUILDING IS UNDER CONSTRUCTION; SAID PARKING PLAN SHALL BE SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL .BY,. THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF ANY BUILDING PERMITS. 5) THE APPLICANT SHALL RETAIN THE SERVICES OF AN ARCHEOLOGICAL CONSULTANT WHO WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CONDUCTING ARCHEOLOGICAL MONITORING OF ALL GROUND DISTURBING ACTIVITY AS WELL AS. THE SUBSEQUENT RECOVERY OF ARTIFACTS. SAID CONSULTANT SHALL WORK AT THE DIRECTION OF THE DADE COUNTY ARCHEOLOGIST AND SHALL PROVIDE REPORTS TO BOTH THAT OFFICE AND TO THE CITY. 6),THE APPLICANT - SHALL SUBMIT A FINAL REVISED LANDSCAPE PLAN WITH ALL SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE -REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A,BUILDING PERMIT. 7) ,THIS. APPROVAL SHALL ALSO BE SUBJECT TO ALL ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS. AS SPECIFIED IN THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER. HEARING DATE:. January 19, 2000 ' ITEM NO. 4. VOTE: 8-0 ATTEST.- 1 a Gelabert- anchez, •ecto Planning and Zoning Department 7 A E'1 -ERPRI E3 z G/1 0 0 00 00 ILI a?Io-o 15-0 uuoou -00 oc ST. LLJ Z' J, 1TR 3 -1A Q 2 12 1 cc. 0:1 ' c 53 31--- 9 J 1. o I Moo -T -.q 7 i 0, LJ ivo I X IBM[ MI X S74 2- 009 4 'T 3 a- 104 5--wO 0 r y 0 0 0 o Ar9 21 Lo C) o 11 22 2� O 1, I 1 1, 8 cp S T. 5 o o o S. o' to o' YUTPSJ�' EELEMoo' SCHOOL o ' ' ' o 000 S T.—j S.E. 13 S7 sueo-IL 5 T. Of, 14 TERP o co 1 919 o c r •A RR 5--wO 0 r y 0 0 0 o Ar9 21 Lo C) o 11 22 2� O 1, I 1 1, 8 cp S T. 5 o o o S. o' to o' YUTPSJ�' EELEMoo' SCHOOL o ' ' ' o 000 S T.—j S.E. 13 S7 sueo-IL 5 T. Of, 14 TERP o co 1 919 o c r •A RR Go- 188 CITY OF MIAMI PLANNING. DEPARTMENT APPLICATION FOR MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT IT IS INTENDED THAT MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMITS BE REQUIRED WHERE SPECIFIED USES AND/OR OCCUPANCIES INVOLVE MATTERS DEEMED TO BE OF CITYWIDE OR AREA -WIDE IMPORTANCE. THE CITY COMMISSION SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR DETERMINATIONS ON APPLICATIONS FOR MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMITS. (SEE AR77CLE17OFORDINANCE I1000,ASAMENDED, THE ZONINGORDINANCEOFTHE CITYOFML4MI, FLORIDA) THE CITY COMMISSION SHALL REFER ALL APPLICATIONS FOR MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMITS TO THE PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD AND TO THE DIRECTOR OF THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT FOR RECONIMENDATIONS„AND MAY MAKE REFERRALS TO AGENCIES, BODIES, OR OFFICERS, EITHERTHROUGHTHE PLAN i)EPARTMEN T ORDIRECTLY, FOR REVIEW, ANALYSIS AND/OR TECHNICAL FINDINGS AND DETERMINATIONS AND REPORTS THEREON. (SEESEC77ON 1301.5 OF ORDINANCE 11000, ASAMENDED, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OFTHE CITYOF A&MI FLORIDA.) SECTION 2.633 OFTHE CODE OFTHE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, AS AMENDED, GENERALLY REQUHtES ANY PERSON WHO RECEIVES COMPENSATION, REMUNERATION OR EXPENSES FOR CONDUCTING LOBBYING.ACTIVM' ES'TO REGISTER AS A LOBBYIST WITH THE CITY CLERK, PRIOR TO ENGAGING IN LOBBYING ACTIVITIES BEFORE CITY STAFF; BOARD% COMMITTEES AND THE CITY COMMISSION. A COPY OF SAID ORDINANCE IS AVAILABLE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK (MIAMI CITY HALL), LOCATED AT 3500 PAN AMERICAN DRIVE, MIAMI, FLORIDA 33133. NOTE. TIIISAPPLICATIONMUSTBETYPEWR17TENANDSIGNED INBLACKZNZ I, Brickell Main Street. Ltd. . hereby apply to the Director of the Planning Department of the City of Miami for approval of a Major Use Special Permit under the provisions of Article 17 of the City of Miami Zoning Ordinance. Property Address: See attached Exhibit "A” Nature of proposed use (be specific): A mixed use Rhase project consisting of retaiLhotel and Barking uses. consisting of 1.040rpa j >ngoaces and A 2hased Rrgiect. APPLICATION MATFPTIAF 4 I attach the following in support and explanation of the application: 1. Two original surveys, prepared by a State of Florida Registered Land Surveyor within one year from the date of application. 2. Affidavit disclosing ownership of property covered by application and disclosure of interest form (attach forms 4-83 and 4a-83 to application).. . 0-� APPLICATION MATERIALS (continued) . _ I attach the following in support and explanation of the application: 3. Certified list of owners of real estate within a 375 -foot radius from the outside boundaries of property (attach form 6-83 to application). 4. Maps of the: (a) Existing zoning designation. (b) Adopted comprehensive plan designation for areas on and around the property. 5. General location map showing relation to the site or activity to major streets, schools, existing utilities, shopping areas, important physical features in and adjoining the project, and the like. 6. Concept Plan (a) Site plan and relevant information per Section 1304.2.ld-h. (b) Relationships to surrounding existing and proposed futures uses and activities, systems and facilities, per Section 1702.3.2x. (c) How concept affects existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan principles and designations; tabulation of any required variances, special permits, changes of zoning or exemptions, per Section 1702-3.2b. 7.. Developmental Impact Study (an application for development approval for a Development of Regional Impact may substitute). & Other (be specific): 9. Fee of S 29.620.50, for the Major Use Special Permit, based on current fee schedule as set forth in Chapter 62 of the Code of the City of Miami, as amended. 10. Additional fee of S. 41232.00. for any required special permits, changes of zoningor variances set forth in chapter 62 of the Code of the City'of Miami, as amended: Total Fee: S 70.852.50 S Name Address Phone/Fax Date Milani FL 33131 305-350-2409 / 305-3747593 MNAL APPROVAL OF THIS APPLICATION FOR MAJOR USE SP9aAL PERMIT SHALL CONSW OF Ali EXECUrM RESOLUTION BY THE MIAMI CITY COMMISSION ANDA DEVELOPMENT ORDER ATTACHED THLi W BCH SPECIFIES THE CONDMONS UNDER WHI® THIS MAJOR USE SPECIAL i'l 'H'A. MJCA7ION ISAPPROVED: Ur APPROVED BYTHECHTYCOMNISSION,sAIDRES�LUTYONANDDEVcLarmwrORDMSRAig,UPON�CtMON THEREOF BE TRANMKrr= TO THE OWNER OR AtITHORMW AGENT AT THE ADDRESS SIMCYFIED ABOVE. STATE OF FLORIDA SS COUNTY OF MIAMI -DADS AFFIDAVIT H. Leland Taylor Before me, the undersigned authority, this day personally appeared who being by me first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and says: That he/she is the owner, or the legal representative of the owner, submitting the accompanying application for a public hearing as required by the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, affecting the rea! property located in the City of Miami, as described and listed on the pages attached to this Affidavit and made a part thereof. 2. That all owners which he/she represents, if any, have given their full and complete permission for him/her to act in his/her behalf for the change or modification of a classification or regulation of zoning as set out in the accompanying petition. That the pages attached hereto and made a part of this affidavit contain the current names, mailing addresses, telephone numbers and legal descriptions for the real property of which he/she is the owner or legal representative. 4. The facts as represented in the application and documents submitted in conjunction with this affidavit are true and correct. 1000 Brickell, Ltd., a Florida Limited Partnership By: Hammo t-u-rDe, Inc. Its Sole Generta l Partner Further Affiant sayeth not. By H. eland Taylor, Vice President,affizx=�4cx a9 ;UX4MtRWM= STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this '_4day of Ca_�,hY(, . , 199, by H. Leland Taylor, as Vice President of Hamond Venture, Inc., as General Partner of 1000 Brickell Ltd, on behalf of the*MHe/She is perso y known to me or has produced f as identification and (did not) take an oath. *Limited Partnership Name: Notary Public -State of Florida Commission No.: My Commission Expires: 40 .% tt do %S Ant c� * *w c« ccsrnsz Vdy EXpOW A&Vc, 14.20M 0 188 OWNER'S LIST Owner's Name: 1000 Brickell Ltd. Mailing Address: c/o Vicky Garcia -Toledo Esq., 200 So Biscayne Blvd: Suite 2500. Miami. FL 33131 with cORV to: Lynn R- Lawlc:.P A 1190 Rrir-kell AyPnnP, Siiito 280 Miami, FL 331' Telephone Number: 305-350-2409 (V Garcia -Toledo) • 305-374-0148 (Lynn Lewis) .Legal Description: See attached Exhibit "B" Owner's Name: N/A Mailing Address: Telephone Number. Legal Descriptiori: Owner's Name: N/A Mailing Address: Telephone Number: Legal Description: Any other real estate property owned individually, jointly or severally (by corporation, partnership or privately) within 375 feet of the subject site is listed as follows: Street Address Legal Description See attached Exhibit "D" DISCLOSURE OF OWNERSHIP 1. Legal description and street address of subject real property: See attached Exhibit "B" 2. Owner(s) of subject real Property and percentage of ownership. Note: Section 2-618 of the Code of the City of Miami requires disclosure of all parties having a financial interest, either direct or indirect in the subject matter of a presentation, request or petition to the City Commission. Accordingly, question n2 requires disclosure of shareholders of corporations, beneficiaries of trusts, and/or any other interested parties, together with their addresses and proportionate interest. See attached Exhibit "C" Legal description and street address of any real property (a) owned by any party listed in answer to question #2, and (b) located within 375 feet of the subject real property. 1000 Brickell, Ltd., a Florida Limited Partnership See attached Exhibit "D" Inc s Sole Partner By: Ha end enture, By . / � H. eland Taylor, Vice President -- e -4eregeiagg—instrument—was—aslene :ledged before foe this day of ,19 , by H. Leland Taylor of Hamond Venture, as Vice President -off 1000 Brickell Ltd corporation, on behalf of the corporation. He/She is personally kno me or has produced as identification and i (did not) take an oath. Name: Notary Public -State of Florida Commission No.: STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE GThe foregoing instrument was acknowledged before -me -this �fj�-day of i,l 19 by H. Leland Taylor, as Vice President of Hammond Venture, I c., the General Partner of 1000 Brickell, Ltd., on behalf of th Limited Partner ip. He is personally known to me or has produced ►� �s id tification and `did not) take an oath. /1�1ame Notary Public - State of Florida Commission No.:. My Commission Expires: + `. mma oe ios Ay"ift curw *'L f *AAYComrtnesion CC817232 X2903 68 EXHIBIT "A", Lot 1, less the West 50 feet thereof, and the South A of Lot 2, fess the West 50 feet lheraor, in Block72, of South, --ity of Miami, -iccording to the Plat tliereof, as recorded in Plat Book "B" at Page 41, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County; 916-918 S.E. Hiami Avenue Rd.; Folio #Oi- M07-020-1010 Lot 18, Block 71 of South, City of Miami according to the Plat thereof, as recorded In Plat Book "B" et Page 41. of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County; 55 5-W. 10 Street; Folio 001-0207-010-1100 The North half (%Z) of Lot 2, less the West 50 feet thereof, and all of Lot 3, less tate West 50 fact thereof, Block 72, South, City of Miami, according to the Plat thereof,. as recorded in Plot Book "B" at Page 41, of tile, Pubiic Records of Mlami-Dade County; 900 S.E. Miami Avenue Rd; Folio # 01-0207-020-1030 Lots 5.6; 7..9, 16, all al Lots 17 and 20, Block 71, City of Miami South, Plat Book "B", Page 41; 36 S.W. 9 Street; Folio 401-0207-010-1050 - 50 S.W. 9 Street; Folio #O1-0207-010-1060 . 6Z -M4 S.W. 9 Street; Folio 001-0207-010-1080 59 S.W. 10 Street; Folio #01-0207-010-1180 .57 S.W. 10 Street; Folio #01-0207-010-1190 29 S.W. 10 Street; Folio 001-0207-010-1210 Na'est 75 feet ofLot 9 and an undivided one-half (3/) interest in Lot 91ess the West 75 feet thereof,'Block 72, South, City of Miami. Plat Book "B" at Page 41; 926 -928 S.L. I" Avenue; Folio # 01-0207-020-1100 Lot 21, in Block 71 of S. of MAP OF MIAMI C17.,'FLA, a subdivision, according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Soak B at Page 41 of the. Public Records of Miam i -Dade County, Florida; 25 S.W. 10 Street; Folio 901-0207-010-1230 Lot 8, $lock 71, Socdi, City of Miami. according to the Plat themof,.as recorded In Plat Book "B" al, Page 41 of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida; 60 S.W.9 Street: Folio 001-0207-010-1070 Lot 4, Block 71, Soutli, Ciy of Miami according to the flat Aok thereof.. as recorded in Plat Book $,Page 41, Of the Public Records of Nliami-Dade County, Florida 26 S.W. 9 Street; Folio 001-0207.010=1040 ' The East.26.5 feet of Lot 15. Block 71 South, City of Miami according to the Plat Bok thereof, as recorded in Plat Book B, Page 41, of the Public Records ofMiami-Dade County, Florida Our 458 75 S.W. 10 Street; Folio 001.0207-010-1130 The Bast 28 feet of the West 125 feet of Lot15, Block 71 South, City of Miami according to the flat 130k thereof, as recorded in Piat Book B, page 41, of the public Records of Miami -Dade Coum-y, Florida 818.W.10 street; Folio 001-0207-010-1150 Lots I and 2, Block 71. South, City ofMiamL Plat Book "B", Page 41; Lots 22,23 and 24. Block 71, South, City of Miami, Plat Book "13", rage 41; rhe West 50 feet of Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 72, South, City of Miam 1. Plat Book "B", Page 41; Lots 4 and 5, Block 72, South, City of Miami, Plat Book "B", Page 41. 900 So. Miami Avenue; Folio #014)207-010.1010 920 So. Miami Avenue; Folio #01-0207-010-1020 1 S.W. 10 Street; Folio #01.0207-010-1240 10 S.E. 9 Street; Folio 001-0207-020-1020 901 So. Klami Avenue; Folio # 01.0207-020.1040 Lot 19 Block 71, South, City of Miami, Plitt Book "B", Page 41; 41, 43, 45 and 47 S.W. 10 Street Lot 3, Block 71, South: City of Miami, Plat Book "B", Page 41; 20 S.W, n Street; Folio # 01-0207410-1030 5 60- 18 E3CMIT f,]3« Lot I*, less the West 50 feet thereof, and the South 1/2 of Lot 2, less the West 50 feet thereof, in Block -72, of South, City of Miami, according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in'Plat Book "B" at Page 41, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County; 916-918 S.E. Miaini Avenue Lot 18, Block 71 of South, City of Miami according to the Plat thereof,. as recorded in Plat Book "B" at Page 41, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County; 55. S.W. 10 Street The North half ('/2) of Lot 2, less the West 50 feet thereof, and'all of Lot 3, less the West 50 feet thereof in Block 72, South, City of Miami, according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book "B" at Page 41, of the Public Records' of Miami -Dade County; 900 S.E. Miami Avenue, Lots 5, 6, 7, 9, 16, all of Lots 17 and 20, Block 71, City of Miami South, Plat Book "B", Page 41; 36 S.W. 9 Street; 50'S.W. 9 Street; 62-64 S.W. 9 Street; 59 S.W. 10 Street; 57 S.W. 10 Street; 29 S.W. 10 Street West 75 feet of Lot 9 and an undivided one-half (1/2) interest in Lot 9 less the West 75 feet thereof, Block 72, South, City of Miami, Plat Book "B" at Page 41; 926 -928 S.E. V Avenue Lot 21, in Block 71 of S. of MAP 'OF NHANH CO., FLA, a subdivision, according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book B at Page 41, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida; 25 S.W. 10 Street Lot 8, Block'7 1, South, City of Miami, according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book "B" at Page 41 of the Public Records of M iam i -Dade County, Florida; 60 S.W. 9 Street Lot 4, Block 71, South, City of Miami according to the Plat Bok thereof, as recorded in Plat Book B, Page 41, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida 26 S.W. 9 Street. The East 26'feet of Lot 15, Block 71 South, City of Miami according to the Plat Bok thereof, as recorded in Plat Book B, Page 41, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida The East 28 feet of the West 125 feet' of Lot15, Block 71 South, City of Miami according to the Plat Bok thereof, as recorded in Plat Book B, Page 41, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida EXHIBIT "C" Disclosure for 1000 Brickell Avenue (a) 33.601803% by Ida Akers Morris, W. Allen Morris and James F. Bell, Trustees under the L. Allen Morris Trust Agreement dated May 15, 1982. The Beneficiaries under this Trust and their respective beneficial interests under the Trust are: (1) Ida Aker Morris, Life Estate, 100% (2) Ida Morris Bell, 33.33% Remainder Interest (3) Kathryn C. Morris Rupp, 33.33% Remainder Interest (4) W. Allen Morris, 33.33% Remainder Interest (b) 20.798884% by W. Allen Morris and Diane Yohe Morris, Trustees under the W. Allen Morris Trust Agreement dated March 29, 1983. The Beneficiary under this Trust and.his beneficial interest under the Trust is: (1) W. Allen Morris, 100% (c) 20.743866% by Kathryn C. Morris Rupp, Trustee under the Kathryn C. Morris Rupp Thirty (30) Year Trust. The Beneficiary under this Trust and her beneficial interest under the Trust is: (1) Kathryn C, Morris Rupp, 100% (d) 10.555327% by Ida Morris Bell (e) 5..094270% by James Frank Bell, III (f) 5.094270% by William Allen Bell (g) 3.111580% by Ida Kathryn Bell (h) 1 % by Hammond Venture, Inc., General Partner. The following are the owners of Hammond Venture, Inc., a Georgia corporation authorized to do business in Florida: (1) 52% by Ida Akers Morris, W. Allen Morris and James F. Bell, Trustees under the L. Allen Morris Trust Agreement dated May 15, 1982. See 2(a) above for beneficiaries under the Trust. (2) 10.50% by W. Allen Morris and Diane Yohe Morris, Trustees under the W. Allen Morris Trust Agreement dated March 29, 1983. See 2(b) above for beneficiary under the Trust. (3) 12.50% by Kathryn C. Morris Rupp, Trustee under the Kathryn C. Morris Rupp Thirty (3 0) Year Trust. See 2(c) above for beneficiary under the Trust, (4) 12.6% by James F. Bell, Jr. (5) 12.5% by Ida Morris Bell, III: The following are the officers and directors of Hammond Venture, Inc. (a) James F. Bell, Jr., President/Director (b) W. Allen Morris, Vice President/Director (c) Gary L. Rupp, Vice President/Director (d) H. Leland Taylor, Vice President/Director (e) Bill C. Davis, Secretary/Treasurer/Director (f) Diane C. Collins, Assistant Secretary (g) Eileen B. Roe, Assistant Secretary (h) Judith McKelvey Walker, Assistant Secretary. M�M 0 Exhibit "D„ 0 Properties owned by 1000 Brickell Ltd. within 375' radius of Perimeter Lines of Brickell Main Street Proiect W 20 feet of Lots 2 & 3, all of Lots 4, 5, 6 and 7, Block 55, 801 S. Miami Ave South City .of Miami, Plat Book "B",'Page 41, Lots 8 and 9, Block 55, South City of Miami, Plat Book "B", Page 41 827 S. Miami Ave Lot 20, Block 56, South City of Miami, Plat Book "B"; Page 41 35 SW 9 St I.50 feet of Lots 22,23 & 24, Block 56, South City of.Miami, 824. S. Miami Ave Plat Book "B", Page 41 S 50 feet of Lots 1, 2 & 3, and N 50 feet of Lots 23 & 24, Block 74, 1024 S. Miami Ave South City of Miami, Plat Book :B.", Page 41 . Lot -4, Block 74, South City of Miami; Plat Book "B", Page 41 28-30 SW 10 St. Lot 5 & S 50 feet of Lot 6, Block 74, South City of Miami, 34-36 SW 10 St Plat Book "S", Page 41 N 100 feet of Lot '6, Block 74, South City of Miami, 38 SW10 St. Plat Book "B", Page 41 Lot 7, Block 74; South City of Miami, Plat Book "B", Page 41 50 SW 10 St Lot 8, Block 74, South City of Miami, Plat Book "B", Page 41 62 SW 10 St N 100 feet of Lot 9, Block 74; South City of Miami, Plat Book 68 -SW 10 St.. "B", Page 41 N 10 feet of Lot 1, 1, W 61.5 feet of L6t'l0, Block 74, 88&94 SW lost South City of Miami, Plat Book "B", Page 41 E 33.5 feet of W 95 feet of Lot 10 and of Lot 11, Block 74,- 84 SW 10 St South City of Miami, Plat Book "B", Page 41 E 30 feet of Lot 10 and E 30 feet of N 10 feet of Lot 11, Block 74, 74 SW 10 St South City of Miami, Plat Book "B", Page 41 E 50 feet of Lots 14 & 15, Block 74, South City of Miami, 75 5W 11 St Plat Book "B", Page 41 Lot 16, Block 74; South City of Miami, Plat Book "B", Page 41 59 SW 11 St Lot 17, Block 74, South City of Miami, Plat Book "B", Page'41 . 69 SW 11 St Lot 18, Block 74, South City of Miami; Plat Book "B", Page 41 51 SW 11 St Lots 19.& 20, Block 74, South City of Miami, Plat Book "B", Page 41 47 SW 11 St Lots 1, 2, 3, 4 and Lots 22, 23, 24 & 25, Blk 100S, Mary. Brickell's 1000 Brickell Ave Addition, Plat Book "B", Page 113 ALL PLAT BOOK REFERENCES ARE TO THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF MIAMI -DADS COUNTY, FLORIDA AFFIDAVIT STATE OF FLORIDA } )SS COUNTY OF MIAMI -DADS ) Before me, the undersigned authority, this day personally appeared Fittipaldi Executive Center, Inc. who being by me first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and says: That he/she is the owner, or the legal representative of the owner, submitting the accompanying application for a public hearing as required by the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, affecting the real property located in the City of Miami, as described and listed on the pages attached to this„Affidavit.and made a part thereof. 2. That all owners which he/she represents, if any, have given their full and complete permission for him/her to act in his/her behalf for the change or modification of a classification or regulation of zoning as set out in the accompanying petition. That the pages attached hereto and made a part of this affidavit contain the current names, mailing addresses, telephone numbers and legal descriptions for the real property of which he/she is the owner or legal representative. 4. The facts as represented in the application and documents submitted in conjunction with this affidavit are true and correct. Further Affiant sayeth not. Daniel Goodstadt , Vice President STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI -DADS The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of OC -b ber- , 19 9 _, by Daniel Goodstadt, Vice President of Fittipaldi Executive Center, Inc. a Florida corporation, on behalf of the corporation. ®She is personally known to me or has produced ''FL T>rt\fer5 L- jC� S -E' as identification�nd'who did (did not) take an oath. ,tee% Name: Notary Public -State of Florida Commission No.: My Commission Expires: i OWNER'S LIST Owner's Name: Fittipaldi Executive Center Inc. Mailing,Address: c/o Vicky Garcia -Toledo Esq... 200 So. Biscayne Blvd., Suite 2500, Miami, FL 33131 Telephone Number: 305-350-2409 Legal Description: 'Lots 1 and.2, Block 71, South, City of Miami, Plat Book "B", Page 41; Lots 22, 23 and 24, Block 71, South, City of Miami, Plat Book "B", Page 41; The West 50 feet of Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 72, South, City of Miami, Plat Book."B", Page 41; Lots 4 and 5, Block 72, South, City of Miami, Plat Book "B", Page 41._ 900 So. Miami Avenue; 920 So. Miami Avenue; 1 S.W. 10 Street; 10 S.E. 9 Street; 901 So. Miami Avenue Owner's Name: WA Mailing Address: Telephone Number: Legal Description: Owner's Name: N/A Mailing Address:, Telephone Number: Legal Description: Any other real estate property owned. individually, jointly or severally (by corporation, partnership or privately) within 375 feet of the subject site is listed as follows: Street Address Legal Description 0-. DISCLOSURE OF OWNERS 1. Legal description and street address of subject real property: Lots 1 and 2, Block 71, South, City of Miami, Plat Book "B", Page 41; Lots 22, 23 and 24, Block 71, South, City, of Miami, Plat Book "B", Page 41; The West 50 feet of Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 72, South, City of Miami, Plat Book "B", Page 41; Lots 4 and 5, Block 72, South, City of Miami, Plat Book 'B", Page 41. 900 So. Miami Avenue; 920 So. Miami Avenue; 1 S.W. 10 Street; 10 S.E. 9 Street;. 901 So. Miami Avenue 2. Owner(s) of subject real Property and percentage of ownership. Note: Section 2-618 of the Code of the City of Miami requires disclosure of all parties having a financial interest, either direct or indirect in the subject matter of a presentation, request or petition to the City Commission. Accordingly, question #2 requires disclosure of shareholders of corporations, beneficiaries of trusts, and/or any other interested parties, together with their addresses and proportionate interest. Fittipaldi Executive Center, Inc. owned by: Emerson Fittipaldi as sole stockholder of the corporation 3. Legal description and street address of any real property (a) owned by any party listed in answer to question #2, and (b) located within 375 feet of the subject real property. N/A Daniel Goodstaat, Vice President STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this Q /44N day of Q0±Q Y' , 19QG'by Daniel Goodstadt, Vice President of Fittipaldi Executive Center, Inc., a Florida corporation on behalf of the corporation. He/She is personally known to me or has produced X14 ii 5 L. CP ii S a as identification and who did (did not) take an oath. 4 IaL;_eAf Name: Notary Public -State of Florida Commission No.: My Commission Expires: V A F,.F, h.D` A. V I T STATE OF FLORIDA } )SS COUNTY OF MIAMI -DADS } Before me, the undersigned authority, this day personally appeared Edward and Lena Moylan , who being by me first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes `and says: 1. Thathe/she is the owner, or the legal representative of the owner, submitting the accompanying application fora public hearing as required by -the Zoning Ordinance of 'the City of Miami, Florida, affecting the real property located in the City of Miami, as described and listed on the pages attached to this Affidavit and made a part thereof. 2. That all owners which he/she represents,. if any, have given their full and complete permission for him/her to act in his/her behalf for the change or modification of a classification or regulation of zoning as set out in the accompanying petition. 3. That the pages attached hereto and made apart of this affidavit contain the current names, mailing addresses, telephone numbers and legal descriptions for the real property of which he/she is the owner or legal representative. 4. The facts as represented in the application and documents submitted in conjunction with this affidavit are true and correct. Further Affiant sayeth not. , STATE OF FLORIDA acknowledged before me this_ day of a r _ t O n 5 r7 19a, by Edward N. Moylan �r has produced as identification and who did(did not) take an oath. NOku 0, ame: II Notaryublic- tate of Florida f4�1J "LA- Commission No.: My Commission Expires: . STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI -DARE t was acknowledged before me this " ° day of c 2-- , 19 4 i by Lena H. Moylan He he is personally known to me or has• produced mil identification and who did (did not) take an oath. A31v� w �v p & 1E-- OWNER'S LIST Owner's Name: Edward N. Moylan and Lena H. Moylan, his wife Mailing Address: c/o Vicky Garcia -Toledo Esq., 200 So. Biscayne Blvd., Suite 2500, Miami, FL 33131 Telephone Number: 305-350-2409 Legal Description: Lot 19 Block 71, South, City of Miami, Plat Book "B", Page 41; 41, 43, 45 and 47 S.W. 10 Street Owner's Name: N/A Mailing Address: Telephone Number: Legal Description: Owner's Name: N/A Mailing Address: Telephone Number: Legal Description: Any other real estate property owned individually, jointly or severally (by corporation, partnership or privately) within 375 feet of the subject site is listed as follows: Street Address N/A Legal Description DISCLOSURE OF OWNERS 1.. 'Legal description and street address of subject real property: Lot 19 Block 71, South, City of Miami, Plat Book "B", Page 41; 41, 43, 45 and 47 S.W. 10 Street 2. Owner(s) of subject real Property and percentage of ownership. Note: Section 2-618 of the Code of the City of Miami requires disclosure of all parties having a financial interest, either direct or indirect in the subject matter of a presentation, request or petition, to the City Commission. Accordingly, question #2 requires disclosure of shareholders of. corporations, beneficiaries of trusts, and/or • any other interested parties, together with their addresses and proportionate interest. Edward and Lena Moylan 100% 3. Legal description and street address of any real property. (a) owned by any party listed in answer to question #2, and (b) located within 375 feet of the subject real property. N/A EdwarS N. Moylan STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI -DADS fore o�in6=sttru�mentas ac`cBA�dt before me this C.�-day of 1�, by Edward N. Moylan. HeAS*e isperso�i p�t�ed�i as identifi ation and who did (did not) take an oath. .•MMISSlpN �Qvmy? A9• * ; " •.� ? * = Notary Public -State of Florida (Q� • lV N .o #CC 706530 ; Q� Commission No.: J • o ,Ofd.ed00014 �pQ� My Commission Expires ,�•'�:':1:::�'••�\,���� STATE OF FLORIDA //����p i►ni IiNo��\\\` COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE The "fore oing_ipstrument, acknowledged before me this 2 ,'day ofctyeAvi 19�, by Lena H. Moylan. e is personally known to me r has produced as identificat'on and who did (did not) take an oath. OdA4 �4 4= 4 Notary Public -State of Florida Commission No.: My Commission Expires: V1NSii;);r �:No`�aocY Lou F G�ttMISSION QVARY? �q9� • S0-4*- 9oy OCC 706530 Q °titled 8+� c . •Q g �i�i/.OG.•fain-Insu��.� ����� Agcy 110 �- ��//j/1111111111N\�� c u • AF)F'IDAVIT 0 STATE OF FLORIDA } ISS COUNTY OF MIAMI -DADS } Before me, the undersigned authority, this day personally appeared Brickell Main Street, Ltd. who being by me first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and says: That he/she is the owner, or the legal representative of the owner, submitting the accompanying application for a public hearing as required by the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, affecting the real property located in the City of Miami, as described and listed on the pages attached to this Affidavit and made a part thereof. 2. That all owners which he/she represents, if any, have given their full and complete permission for him/her to act in his/her behalf for the change or modification of a classification or regulation of zoning as set out in the accompanying petition. That the pages attached hereto and made a part of this affidavit contain the current names, mailing addresses, telephone numbers and legal descriptions for the real property of which he/she is the owner or legal representative. 4. The facts as represented in the application and documents submitted in conjunction with this affidavit are true and correct. Further Affiant sayeth not. Vicky Garcia -Toledo, W. Attorney for Brickell Mfiin Street, Ltd. STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI -DADS The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this / J day of 1911, by Vicky Garcia -Toledo, Esq., attorney for Brickell Main Street, Ltd., on behalf of the corporation. She is personally known to me or has produced s identification anf '�vho did (did not) take an oath. MY COMMISSIONVericaT C 789850 Name: / /l C3 EXPIRES: November 9, 2002 Notary Public -State of Florida BmdW Pru fthud Irtwra wAWcy Commission No.: My Commission Expires: — 1818 OWNER'S LIST Owner's Name: Brickell Main Street Ltd. Mailing Address: c/o Vicky Garcia -Toledo Esq 200 So Biscayne Blvd., Suite 2500, Miami, FL 33131 Telephone Number: 305-350-2409 Legal Description: Lot 3, Block 71, South, City of Miami, Plat Book "B", Page 41 20 S.W. 9 Street . Owner's Name: N%A Mailing Address: Telephone Number: Legal Description: Owner's Name: N/A Mailing Address: Telephone Number: Legal Description: Any other real estate property owned individually, jointly or severally (by corporation, partnership or privately) within 3.75 feet of the subject site is listed as follows: Street Address Legal Description NIA N/A DISCLOSURE OF OWNERSIO 1. Legal description and street address of subject real property: Lot 3, Block 71, South, City of Miami, Plat Book 'B", Page 41; 20 S.W. 9 Street 2. Owner(s) of subject real Property and percentage of ownership. Note: Section 2-618 of the Code of the City of Miami requires disclosure of all parties having a financial interest, either direct or indirect in the subject matter of a presentation, request or petition to the City Commission. Accordingly, question #2 requires disclosure of shareholders of corporations, beneficiaries of trusts, and/or any other interested parties, together with their addresses and proportionate interest. See attached Exhibit "E" 3. Legal description and street address of any real property (a) owned by any party listed in answer to question #2, and (b) located within 375 feet of the subject real property. N/A Attorney for0ivner, Vicky Garcia -Toledo, Esq. STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of by Vicky Garcia -Toledo, Esq., attorney for Brickell Main Street, Ltd., on behalf of the corporation. She is personally known to me or has produced as identification and who did (did not) take an oath. �? a�.,,.u�y V0111A lea* MY COMMISSION # CC 789850 ea,aealn,�ru? Nia�era ber 9,2002 Innsurance A9eMr Name: Notary Public -State of Florida Commission No.: , My Commission Expires: EXHIBIT "E!" Disclosure for: Brickell Main Street, Ltd. (Vk/a Brickell Walk, Ltd.) owned by: General Partner: Brickell Main Street Management, Ltd. a Florida limited partnership Limited Partners: Constructa, Inc., a Delaware corporation Brickell Investors, Inc., a Florida corporation Emerson Fittipaldi, as an individual Brickell Main. Street Management, Ltd owned by: Brickell Main. Street Management, LL.C., a Florida limited liability company Constructa,,. Inc., a Delaware corporation Brickell Investors, Inc., a Florida corporation Emerson Fittipaldi, as an individual Constructa, Inc.,.a Delaware corporation owned by: Constructa, US,, Inc., a Delaware corporation 100% Brickell Investors, Inc., a Florida corporation, owned by: Mario Garnero 100°l0 Emerson Fittipaldi as an individual 100% i i Continued EXHYBIT "E" Constructa U.S., Inc. Corporate Information Employer ID Number 52-1482952 Organized Delaware 06/06/1988 Authority to Act Authority to Act FL 04/17/1987 Shareholder Information Owner/Interest% Bellechasse, S.A. 75.00% Owner/Interest% Novafuture * 3.57% Owner/Interest% Sofinad* 14.29% Owner/Interest% Banque National de Paris* 7.14% Owner/Interest% Total Interests held 100.00% Stock Information Total Interests Authorized 35,000 Par Value per Interest $ 1.00 Director/Officer Information Executive/Title(s) Marc Pietri (Bellechasse) Director, President Executive/Title(s) Dominique Chatillon (Bellechasse) Director Executive/Title(s) Jean -Pascal Tranie (Bellechasse) . Director Executive/Title(s) Claude -Eric Paquin (Bellechasse) Director Executive/Title(s) Alain Mallart (Bellechasse) Director Executive/Title(s) Dominique Picon Director Executive/Title(s) J. Ducros Director Executive/Title(s) Rene Tendron Advisory Director Executive/Title(s) Jean -Jacques de Flers Advisory Director Executive/Title(s) Jean -Marc Meunier Vice President Executive/Title(s) Eric Fazilleau Vice President, Secretary Executive/Title(s) Andrew Kwiat Treasurer * Publicly traded companies in France GADMS\72343 \ 1208410262688.01 10/12/1999 6,0- 188 ACTIONNAIRES % Date d'ac uisition Continued EJIMIT "E" Nombre BELLECHASSE S.A. mise A jour apres cession N°53 Creation. FORME JURIDIQUE Societe Anonyme ADRESSE 73, rue de Miromasnil a compter du 11 mars1996. 12/01/1990 75008 PARIS . OBJET SOCIAL Marchande de biens, prise de participations CAPITAL 24,225,000 Francs COMPOSITION DU CAPITAL 85,000 actions de 285 Francs N°REGISTR.E COMMERCE PARIS 94 BO 9248 CREATION N° REGISTRE DU COMMERCE MARSIELLE 87 B 798 DUREE DE LA SOCIETE 50 ans DATE IMMATRICULATION 19 mars 1985 au RCS d'Antibes ANNONCE DE LA CONSTITUTION 2 ferier 1985 N°SIRET 332 235 423 00065 CODE A.P.E. 701 F President Directeur General Monaleur Marc PIETRI (3 Janvier 91) ACTIONNAIRES % Date d'ac uisition Date Nombre Marc PIETRI 4.29 Creation. 28/9/99 3,650 Rozann PIETRI 0.00 12/01/1990 R6s 2002 1 Bellechassee Inveatiaaement 89.64 05/17/1995 ° ####### 76,197 C.D.E. 2.94 05/01/1991 2,500 Stephana RICHARD 0.00 05/03/1996 1 Claude Eric PAQUIN 0.00 07/10/1997 1 Dominique CHATILLON 0.12 ' 12/01/1990 100 S.D.R.M. 300 :. 01/01/1993 2.550 100 85,000 CONSEIL D'ADMINISTRATION: President du Consiel: Renvimmt CA du 3/11/97 pour dur6e Idem Marc PIETRI Dominique CHATILLON Comptoir des Entrepreneurs. repr6sentee par, _Bernard SOUBRANE Rozann PIETRI Claude Eric PAQUIN Stephane RICHARD COMMISSAIRE AUX COMPTES Cabinet MAZAR ET GUERARD SUPPLEANT Monsleur Philippe BOUILLET G:\DMS\72343\ 12084\0262688.01 10/12/1999 Date mandat Renouv. 06/23/1997 R6s 2002 06/23/1997 R#s 2002 06/23/1997 R6s 2002 06/23/1997 R6s 2002 07/25/1997 Res 2002 06/281997 R6s 2002 06/23/1997 R6s 2002 06/23/1997 Res 2002 k«5139 v 28 : Stat: of 3lartba. 4vudp of owde . r?� lgnitf# thm as thio &T PF ally opprered b•lor me, an of mw duly ertA.wir.d t., wlmin.oteroorhsand take r-Aftow Outemta. John Earl Iakey and Ruhv Ellen Lakey, his wife, n. me u.•!l &a.a.. tr be the pyran 5 deatribed is amyl who eierrted rhe ft .-cooing d-1. and rin..r l.•1 e•.! trfo►e me eGot . rhev erecet d the same frwlr tad anlrwterily Jew the purprre therein eepr.•+...1. Ana 3 Surorr Slrttfn. 74M RA? Bald kaorw to m.• to be the wife of the said as • srppvvowra and pri.e erammotion mkm mad made by wl befwv tae. separe my and opott from her maid Arsbrsd did rkm! r. "Ar tAsu she Bode Geri/ a ppaarreeyy v amid JsJ f— the pstrp— of twtorwe & -bmv ohms rsd e+m.r►rrrt all her Fiske. title amd iatens4 sabrrhrr rharrr. hma..+trmd ar arj setariue prwpr"y. mlpirrr of is and to the loads drwrmib.d therria. and that aha ereestted the sial drill ft wly earl .drwtrdv and inter. art any eeatpoltir.a, na.oauiat. opprrhewraw ar fav of s fs..m her r&i Arabaetd. NUMBS my hand adoficialwldu Iiialeah !'nwyoj Waaler and$aUeoJ Floritia ►Aim () '�� day of July . A. n. fg hh . n ' LC.f6 fly er.a�t�iaraa •:piers: ... �:}.L•-":S:_ �_- s�:'E ''•..Nsv Prblir. Some of FLrila- moan role[ s^•� r t:[mt7a r taaGi in tum- ti nu Mss ..y��+ rwas . ..a+n+taaaat e i R T Is a as 3 +art 3' • o o C1 U39 247 Srj Warrantg 3B Ppb tM M4is 3nbrittm. Aid. this W I v ISI 11 SkTIVEFN Inhn earl Lakev and RLjbv r-.1jer Lakpv, hi, wifo. it of th, Cowwaty 01 Mvje in.th,SwetI -f Flo Ida. part i- ..j A.- #rw jew, ,,.I and Lena If. M,-wirtil, his wii,-. A nJ 11" C___Y "I 11plah• in the -'*Me of F&srids, parr i, .1 th, *md port. IMNESSE771. V60 A, -ad rwt of the firm pro,- 1w &%d i's ~Aid"O of the M .1 7 ")n!lar- i.n.f other rout and valuahle rnn�ittt,ratinn-, .n to in head Paw by she pwt i 0 � of the wtvad port. 1A,V.#,eipc wh""I is )_:1 P"W"L AWSO"d and told" she a" pwt i 01 the aw"Ad part. k~v Md amps. *r~• the falm"s jr—i" lGrA swoop. JYMP! sosid bsItalt is 111;iI_ C_0687 Of mod Stop *I Fl&ndd6 soma: I-,,- I,), in iilwk 71 vC11711, 'try IV %:I I'll I ,%( ... t)rdinn in th-i Plat Vir-rent . .•-r.••.!-. .n i'1 Ko -.k It, at Pante -ii, n f I I,o I iv :!.-t •,r Pl,%rida- frith I -C. -ITC -I! with the rurni-=hinn- and fixtur.- a. rwr invaninry a5 anres-ri ulwin hetwo.-n ho p. -%rt ti— h.-reto. ft 7 ,tth,;s+cj in conditinnx, an.: limitation, cir reenr,4: rnninn aw! t;%veq for 101-(. xn-t ,uhve.ju,-nt years. Uj Stihiect also to a First Ptjrchnqa� Money `kInirtearte betwevit the part_ies.herezo in the origin.al princip. amount of S mo -4w L:1 P-1 I. OFF? 308 w, 18536 Z PREPARED BY AND RETURN TO: Terri Grumer Sonn, Esq. Simon, Schindler & Sandberg, P.A. 2650 Biscayne Boulevard Miami, Florida 331374590 (305) 576-1300 WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO: John L. Sumberg, Esq. Bilzin, Sumberg, Dunn, Price & Axelford, L.L.P. 200 S. Biscayne Blvd., Suite 2500 Miami, FL 33131 Folio No.: C.JC 011 E 1 C IC 30 WARRANTY DEED • 99R 157534 1999 MAR 26 1014 DOCSTPDEE 3P148.80 SURTX 2,361.60 HARVEY RUVIN, CLERK DADE COUNTYr FL THIS WARRANTY DEED made this, da anvei �Y y of r�, 1999 from MICHAEL LATTERNER, individually and as trustee, whose post office address is: 13 S.W. 7'}' Street, Miami, FL 33130, in the County of Miami -Dade, State of Florida, ("Grantor)*, to BRICKELL WALK, Ltd., a Florida limited parbmtship, whose post office address is: c/o John L. Sumberg, Esq., Bilzin, Sumberg, Dunn, Price & Axelrod, L.L.P., 200 S. Biscayne Blvd., Miami, FL 33131, in the County of Miami -Dade, State of Florida, ("Grantee")*, * "Grantor" and "Grantee" are used for singular or plural, as the context requires. WITNESSETH: That the Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of TEN and NO/100 DOLLARS ($10.00) and OTHER GOOD AND VALUABLE consideration, to said Grantor in hand paid by said Grantee, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained and sold to the said Grantee, and Grantee's heirs and assigns forever, the following described land, situate, lying and being in Miami -Dade County, Florida, to wit: Lot 3, Block 71, in MIAMI SOUTH, according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book B, Page 41, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. The above property is not the Homestead property of the "Grantor", nor is it contiguous to his Homestead. SUBJECT TO: 1. Zoning restrictions imposed by governmental authority; G— 198 OFF REc 18536 PC 2309 2. Taxes for 1999, which are not yet due and payable; 3. 'Resolution No. R-923-84 re: Downtown Component of Metrorail Project, recorded August 30,1984, in Official Records Book 12253, Page 1389,, and Resolution No. R-975-95, .recorded July 17, 1995, in Official Records Book 16851, Page 627, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida. 4. Resolution No. R-987-89 re: Metromover Stage I, recorded September 19, 1989, in Official Records Book 14258, Page 2399; Resolution No. R-697-90, recorded August 1, 1990, in Official Records Book 14646, Page 2513; Resolution No. R-824-91, recorded August 28, 1991, in Official Records Book 15158, Page 2413; Resolution No. R4854-92, recorded August 7, 1992, in Official Records Book 15615, Page 1652; Resolution No. R-1028- 93, recorded August 27, 1993, in Official Records Book, 16035, Page 3996; Resolution No. R-1261-94, recorded August 16, 1994, in Official Records Book 16478, Page 1048; Resolution No. R-1121-95, recorded August 4, 1996, in Official Records Book 16872, Page 1634; Resolution No. R-893-96, recorded August 23, 1996, in Official Records Book 17326, Page 2605; and Resolution No. R-894-97, recorded September 15,1997, in Official Records Book 17789, Page 637, all of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida AND Grantor hereby fully warrants the title -to said land, and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Grantor,has signed and sealed these presents the, day and year first above written. Signed, sealed and delivered in our presence: Witnesses: ,i WITNESS: MICHAEL NER, Individually and Print Name: as trustee WITNESS: Print.Name: CYNV S LA \164 C6-o"o 138 • AEC 18536 2310 • STATE OF FLORIDA ) )SS COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE) The foregoing instrument was acknowiedged before me this day of January, 1999 by MICHAEL LATTERNEK individually and as bvstee who is personally known to me or who has produced (type of wwokown) as identification. NOTARY PUBLIC lattemer.9\deed PRINT NAME My Commission Expires: (NOTARIAL SEAL) Car„iee ,McIntire NoWy Pub k, 8tft of FbrWe W COMM. EXOM Aur 5520th No. CC540M eer+e.a fiw. aarmw a t3oo� �.m anw„" AEGORD COUN'ry, OF O CRtFfED RECORD v_ R11V1N HAS�V� rC0URr CLERK CIRCU, 00- 188 D�alOmilelilA ' ss�sti�a ara 97R lb 1.'8%.4 1997 APR IS M47 ck !76wly+ 0 w..0 m n r.e al 02070IC 1040 Ot t R mt 40CSTPOEE 1,2W.44 RMTY 900.00 30C5TP-M 2032. CIL � Dfttd RtNIN, C -UK OAM CCvh7Y, FL TMA t.,.e....we ma& this 31th d"a Awn .3997 Aix. JOSUS GUY SC MIE and FAMA A. SCHMI E, bu and sad wW dsiomwac Dade . Seisd FkcWs �graggaM iia 3000 BBTC f J , LTD, a FkwWa lindud part eemUp w� mm w w 1000 Bddma Avmw.. Says 12W Mia -f, §Udda 33131 dOsommyet DO& , 9sd Fiaesda, �XrJUKdt. : Oiioi4eAMOaSAsatiL®il�oades�l • ............•»•••••...•••.. ....-_.-.---......---Mq NQ1IOO$U.W -------------------- D„U,A„ rassmad��YoiYo�ls�oGiA}!l0l9irt�itb GLUM= .Osae��rfit�s��sd�LAwa eMMUR bmq mdmw MUir=id CMAMM md Owtamtis MOW b". ' mom vmmdbmwIaviCpPd ,bade mtc" Lot Cr -Bloch 71 South, CM Ol..R31i8i ,••.•.•,•�_�� to the Plat t*—w+f, as teCasded In Plat Boob 8, Page 41, of the Adie Recozda. of Dade Covnty, llorida Subject to r••:sem•••,•••, reservations and its of zeeord., " nay, wtieh aze not saimposed bmaby, sad taus aubsegsent to December 31st, 3.996. Subject to that esrtaia mortgage dsted,Movemebsr 6", 1995, filed and recocded Rovember 9, 1995 In Official Records 80" 16983, Page 4574, Public Reeesda of Dads County ilorida, whits Gx=%se herein &::vers and agsties to pay. aao�arw.ra waw MRM Ft" . '7w doCil Gi7l/r • Mass swum rays* M� etms Im"Ah idiapmm tArOOiL ta: W�ie�, wri b� is OW w ft&ui iao dW Xt iii/ 60 40s wd i QLD Zada QOC� JOB ' Widen ing SW423ima s, m=w6 FL mm Faeb Vas"m lAUYr► A. SfSUL.a Wltasaa a LAAh. 5155 SW42 Tavime, hfismd, FL 3315 S'Pi►� OF F1oeldt COUNTY OF Dade • 1U glare aAswmiet wAm m ft, Ilii .A of Apt U!7 A JOMM GUY SO== and FAMA A. SCHJ[= w.ase...r�A.wais�s.ws�.r.�rsFfoeida s GRIGALMULAU MAL IL tasnacommx Ma.rr.eer� 07 1®astmAavlt r�aattadssratiar i tel/ N4OD■1 Caa�t w se•. �m �! lob '' 'OltDvsla�i� � tarm.af.essr� . COLAS"eooD/AMl� amsmaa..t �« wM IEL ! IfiO0IS4O4O nmim mm&w 01 02070101040 Q . n mr C7 S ?R 1618 14 199] OR 15 08:47 O CTMEEE 1r2M.0a PAT% 900.00 accsv-BTG =25 mThk TZ'$�� W -RHE." R'JVllir CL:'RlC OQE MUtMr FL lode�sss"`' efa& d s Um &Y df AVzU .1997 Am. Be6sPon JO -SM GUY SQU M and PAULA A. SCE1U1.M 8asbmd aed wW etmemmp.t Dad! . 3. 4( Fkcwa 1000 RorC=Tjr., L2, a Florida ftm wd pact amWp aV%wals -6 "mommicUMBddanAvesma, Sdit n0k hftm► 33131 'Rim—esh .................... -.--...... ...................... M&NO/100(5EW------------- •------- aaLIwas oseycan.pfi��sr.e.�.+l,a.a FUNd.b VA"Md.voro.r CRAM= md GUFAIM a s�aa.p�on&"-9 ra _Dade aa..w FWds s.e Lot 4, Stock 71 SM", C= 07, JM a aeca iaq to the Plat chsr of, aS recorded is Plat Book 8, Page 41, of the Pah' f- Records. of Dads Caussty, lloridm Subject to mm=f •4 -dr, resarwatioea and aasaosats of raeaad, if any, whieh are not retspoaed >saumby, sad rases Snbsagseat to.. December 31st, 1996. Subject to that certain mortgage dated aorapber 6, 1995, Uled and raeasded Rav�eaber 8, 1995 JA afflaialRieosds Boot 16983, Page 1374, Public 8soorea of Dsde Cam t2arids, Which Grantee baseia assmns aad agross to Pap. �r a.et eira+..t •ao.a► PURVEY R1MN n�.•e.�ewer+ut* MOM p.s d0b= pf* S.Otr.sdafp. isommm.s :Vlememl. tfw tf.r .s et mm d .00. or me pw aft am .m.. Inds � FaekJ GUY '� Ono 91►lamis yam... SM SW42 MErias, Wad. FL 33IN Faemk Vaegees PALMA A. SCSUL1 vvkmm rnwN- 3750 SW42 TWTUt, Aftod. FL 3315 STAIZ OF Flsdda C RM OF Dada a. bosas i� •a.m mwmd eN.a fa ti. U& .r .r AP 2 1917 b JFK GUY SC7E MTS Sad PALMA A. SCHUM ....sp•epro.s.�sm.f..pderMfeFiOc�t LMIB Ssebed �mmoeioout e4uor�wtac r�aiAetvom<tsrataar rro....es�es 09 vacs aaeemav eto�cts of iD! co��s�o mast p«:121 LS110596 98R3 17 199 1993 JUN ?r) 161 11 ASSIGNMENT;.OF MORTGAGE KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That I, MARY ELIZABETH. SCHULTE, a single roman', party of rst part, in consideration of the sum of Ten ('S10.'00) Dollars, and other' valuable considerations, received from`or on behalf' of the MARY 8. SCHULTZ, TRUSTEE OF THE MARY E- SCHULTE LIVING TRUST U/T/A DATED JUNE 24TH 1998, party cf rhe second parr, at or before thy-nsea:inl ,n delivery of these presents, the receipt whereat is do hereby grant, baraairi, sell. assign, trar.sfrr 3n•j n said part of . the second part a .ertain mortgage a::d : ••�:::::; i,:,t� November 6, 1995 and executers on November 6th, ;5�;• by wsnrza , SCHULTE and PAULA A. SCHULTZ, his wife,in favor. of mARY ELIZABET3 SCHULTE. and recorded in Official Records Book 16583, pages 457.1 through 4576, .public records 'of .Dade County, Florida, upon the following described piece or parcel of land, situate and being in said fr County and State. to wit: All of -the interest of MARY,EL+ZABETH SCHULTE in the Promissory Note secured by the aforesaid -Mortgage and in the Mortgage 'itself: CITY OF MIAMI SOUTH, Lot 4, Block,71; according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book B, Page 41 of the Public Records of Dade County. a.� Florida. •f a/k/a:26 S.W. 9th Street, Miami, Florida k, NOTE: THIS ASSIGNMENT OF MORTGAGE IS TO VEST ONS -HUNDRED PERCENT (100%) TITLE IN THE AFORESAID MORTGAGE AND PROMISSO- RY NOTE TO MARY E. SCHULTE, AS TRUSTEE OF THE ,MARY E. SCHULTE LIVING TRUST U/T/A DATED JUNE -24TH 1998 Together with the note or obl iaat ion -described• in-'said•,mortgsga�' and the moneys due and to become due thereon, with_intexest tlueF• payable thereon. To HAVE AND To HOLD the same unto the said party of=•t3e- part his heirs, legal representatives, successors -and aes_gas f ` NOTaP.I:1T20lf APPGitS Qr.THR 1'OU40M�1aAi•'- 1 R[C: IN WITNESS WHEREOF. day .,,.:'- _lgned. Sealed .in.1 delivered in pr ser._ witnes '".An'_' - ZA5=-- 11 Z� Prin,%ed Name,ot AVitness: witness: AP — ,#A"4 G+00 anted Name of witness: STATE OF FLORIDA) :SS: COUNTY OF DADE ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 24TH day of June, 1998 by MARY ELIZABETH SCHUL':E, a single woman, who is personally known to me and who did take an oath. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have herewqo set my hand and affixed my official seal at Miami, Dade County,orid is th day of June, 2998. XX My commission expires: wma��acs� • a�ir.or�sor w��oarer�srr+n. j 14- .S 195R iS8683 1995 Nov Da. 11350 Rsava to: w.�. C.M a 3ere:r"Xs4 AddmndGW South Dixie flidiwap. Salle 210 • f1wya33143 pOCSMTG 240.45 IRM137.37 DAD£ COUNTY, FL HARYEY NNIN: UZU Tbit WSWUmeat 1•repaTed by: Cori 11i iortaar" lwqSater 210 5603 Sertk Dime H-7 Dygei.lbriis 3314; i Yarolldee Ner.01.0207-010.1040 i . THIS MORTGAGE DEED Esese=tsd' 6 t da7ai November A.111.19" M J13SXM G. 5CSa11.TZ and PAULA A. SCffM TE. his wily Fb&4da 33133 5733 &w. 42 Terract. Wnwi. bard wftr c Dc d the MvrIlMors. to 4 �SCXMTB Sol W.i�. m1. Flos 33134 berdeafter casted cite blertgs;ea: wed Yer:de the tKrtta razor..-sorger' :ndade a8 &C Yeses, k3s1 "d 'a� r�rarlleRe; �s"istiva pardes to this iits�ts4 said si aaigse Oee a" *@ a,eaesars re Hires ortea N me. now. isch drs an� momlereisdestdYed ea~idsratde+os. �,d;dte . �ajSgregtsQ forgo" aad vai�� lbte AS - A is iia /e+"ar7 �'f ~ d�1t b0Qiasllete�dese ibc m unto we faaswaw an *e olgrtgaft ors andni be a" Sn" bog" sett. dk% rembwk tst�7 d aad is Psa*ssws dtrate io Dade Ora ars aos' s.I eertria tud *jwW t'b tdw ss� . Cos4; P1orWa+viss t:IiY 41g Ul1AlIl19OUT Lot 4. @bad► 71e i sttsrdiaig to dw PMtbM*f. as teeor*d me r Auc ttsu�ds . In "at ilioei% Be P49c il. of ofisde cWAN17. i' ww,,. 1 .j. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD Use same. togetherrrith the teneneatt, bersditunrats and apporteeave thereto wogoog. and the atata. issues and profits thereof. oto the ntongsgees. in fee simple. ANIS the me"gaRors covenant write the wortptees that the mortgstors are indefeasi* seised of said land In ire simple; that the morta beve So" right and iawfd antbonty to convey Mid land as afarcmW; that the wortigagnrs will rnalse Web farther swarsnces to perfect the fee Simple title to Said land in the mortgagees as am reasonably be retia iredt that the mortgagors hereby fully warrant the title to said land wad wid detead the a sane against the Undid claims of to persons wbomseeven and that said land is free and dear of all eaarmnbranees. PROVIDED ALWAYS. dun if baid mortgagoraball pay auto said mortgagee the certain promissory note bereinaRer substantially copies or ideaeilnd. to writ. MORTGAGE NOTE S69AW.I9 Miami. Flarida November6 ,1995 FOR VALUE RECEIATD the unden*wd protists to pay to the order of MARY ELIZABETH SCHULTE the principal start of SlJVrY EIGHT TBOUSANDSULEWWRED EIGHW 77O U AND 191100 (1166,6i13.19) DOLLARS together with interest thereon at the raft of seven MA) percent per sannni from daft =0 maturity, both principal and interest bdog payable in LoWd Money of the United Ststa, sae6 principal troth and interest payable is ioslsibrhents m fa-ws: In equal monthly payrrsests of fi.00Q00 per rawth. with the first such paymem being due and payable an t6c beth day of November. 1995. and a litre payment on the IS& day of each sad ever? man& thereafter until .lane 10, 2000. wben a balloon psyotent is due in the amount of 529.949.06. THIS NOTE IS PREPAYARLE IN PART OR WHOLE AT ANY TIME. WITHOUT PENALTY. Saeb lasua rant payments shalt be sppdud first to the Interest earning under the terms of this nose and then to a reduction of the principal indebtedness. The asaiters and endorsers of this two b tuber agree to wahm4wm mk aotiae of at"ayinew and protnt. and in tae evrnt salt dab be broogbt for the toescam barest. or6e saaw bat to be collected opw detaand of an attermy, to pay reasonable ariarnWs dere- M staking awb sallacdow. AN payer Msraandar aball bra.. Iwterast -tie tM ram of -r 8- percent par ean"wn from Watttu eatl! paid. This new b secured by s rnostgagr of eves elate i-rawltb and la to be coextsresl sal eafteed aeeerdssg to the lams of the State of Melds. upon default In the p aymeat of Princiy r *"dint tataresi wtna 410%d - wtute ata+ us priaeipal and nsterest resel-int onpatd shall, at ttts optica of the holdem become hnmrsliahil due Sad payabkr. lsilare to oseraiw thin option shad not eanstftssa a vmtv®r or the right tw easeeise the aauw b the -Waal ef'wi-e�yslaat def call. M Payable of duN N.W.g.M. 4 &root end -. fi, tlsotidn 33134 J03ETfl.'.{rCEIHlLT1? l or at each other place we shall be tksiptttled :it1�=� Jit - e?r 1- ! E by the holder of emu waste is wtWwW PAULA A. firHI 1I.TF. . t \ s'' • E C�`*i1i li] and sbal perforce. rornpiy with and abide by crab and rrery due agminents, stiputatious. coudi5om and tovenaats tbereaC and of tteis mortgage and the estate hemby erented. shall cause, determine and be nab and void AND the aw g -gera hereby furtber covenaat aadagree to pay pronWdy wbao due the principal sad i-- and other awns of money psovidei hr is sad sea and this mortsaeo. or sicker. to pay all and sirdar the lases. assessments. levies. Babftiet. obB;adom and encumbrances ofrvery nature on said propertys to pern*. eocnnut or sulker nowaste. i»eairmem or deterior mien of said Lod or the iatpraeememb thereon at any times to keep debaiidigai-asw or hen oflas on said land laky iearersd in s sesta of net fins than the highest imeeraiAe vahse in si esmpaay or co, acceptable to the aesu tgagoes. the policy or policies to be bdd by. and payable to. sold snongagets. and in the eveset my sone of weary, becomes payable by liana of soeD bunrodee flee aao�se s6atJ !taut the rlgbt'to rateiere and apply the agate b the 4$ seeored. acre to the.", nwntgagor sity rmflul to pay cog eats. charges. and c9swesincluding lawyer's ran aod.fde scorches. reesweaby incurred or paid by dw mer4pew betssae oltie fatiare ofthe mort;:aor4 to prvnrpdy and My comply with the agrsenwccae. mss. eonitipm asset coveetoa of said meet and this mortgage. or eitheri to perfirsa. comply wilt and abMe by esch and every the every she sa stipulations. conditions d covenssw set forth in said uweapd this or•eitlses. ft . les+ tu4 the aurae. wtthoist waiving oralfecti the option to for eelose or any other right bereuader. std all seep payments shall bear interest from daft d wricof at the highest lawrw rate thea allowed by the haws of the State of Fisrsda. if any stmt of stoney berein referred to bead promptly paid witbia thirty dart's nem after the seem becomes doe. or Neach and every the agremeews. selpoiadoes. eosditione and coveasats of acid trete and this mortgage. or either. are not !idly performed. eonspled wilh sod abided by. thea the satire atm meadated In sadd saff, and alis s artgaga orifi saline balance stra�aid ;t ee+tat aia8 ford witle or thicredler, at the 6ptioa of tier asatgase . basset and be dwe and payaiek. saytiin; ie said tote er harsh b tie eeptrary aotwlt uud3eg. Failte by &e reseegsgees to' ti ae any of the tights or options' provided shall not tome a. wirer of any rights or options under said note . or this mortgage accrued or ticrealk accruing. W Wl'rmw wBwj oF. the said mortgagors brre berwow signed and sealed these presents the day and year fire above wrietsa Signed. sealed sad dle8ver: is due oftpresence e . ,.� // i !� J ion" G SCilie(.TE_ PAULA & SCHU TE STATE OF FLORIDA ) )as COUNIY OF DADS ) I liEitERY CERIVY tbat oa thin day. before cow en o fietr duly authorised in the State s acessid med ins or Cooney she asaw to title a Itwe"Iedparetc. perneediMf appeared, JOSEPH G.SCHULn mrd PAULA A.SCllilMhis wife Is me known to he the gessoes &wrlbod la sod who ematd the fosepoiag i»strurwaat and acknowledged brieve ate thus they e>seeated the o w VVn'M S !try hated and oflidd scat In the Coach ad State Wt afurceaid this day of ' Nowember.l9l� Mapapas �+''f. vattawodwoato a..r.rur,ew *4s.o;p Notary POW. seats of POWWA at hoarse My munistson cspitta: seamw were.ew aasear sseiA Amy arta. I* d 6�t i on* ForprW PREPARED BY: DOUM.AS D. BATcFn=R, EsQul M .350 WERIFAST I SouTmEAG7 3rd A,.,, --.-JE MIAMI. FLORiLIA 21'31 WARRANTY DEED 11485 1425 THIS INDENTURE, made this 2 &day of by and between 1000 BRICKELL, INC., a Florida corporation, party of the first part, and 1000 BRICKELL, LTD., a Florida limited partnership, c/o The Allen morris Company, 1000 Brickell Avenue, on Miami, FL 33131, party of the second part WITNESSETH: cc That the said party Of the first part for valuable r. co consideration to It in hand paid by the second party, the receipt whereaf is hereby acknowltd-3ei, Fa: :ranted, hargained and sold to the said party of the second part, its heirs, successors and assigns forever, the land situate, lying and being in the County of Dade in the State of Florida described on Exhibit 'A' annexed hereto. And the said party of the first part does hereby fully warrant title to said land and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsover. IN wiTmEss WHEREOF, the said party of the first part has caused these presents to be signed in its name by Its proper officers and its corporate seal to be affixed, attested br*'If? secretary, the day and year first above written. 1000 BRICKELL, INC. By: ....... President; ES.t '1426 11485 tb*-Pr0s1dQnt And secretary, respectively* of, 1000 BRICKELL, INC** a Florida corporation, to at known to be the person who signed the foregoing instrument as such officers and seve=ally &CkD0V-1*d1ge the execution thereof to be their free act.and deed as soft officers for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and that tboy affixed thereto the official seal of said corporation and'that said Instrument is the act and deed of said corporation. WITNESS MY SIGNATURE & OVJCIAL SEAL AT, MIAMI, Cqqjii OF DADS, STATE OP FLDRIDA, the dnd year last ':::�afore rid. ZXf mi. otary Pu V— . % 4xF7FK!1j%-T - 4P., 'P . 0 State Of Florida"At Large all • 3 3-% -7 -7- - . . . . . . . . . . -e, 9W �7 H 485 '1427 EXHIBIT 'A" The West 20 Feet of Lots 2 and 3, all of Lots 4, 5, 6, 7,, 8 and 9, Block 55, City Of Miami South, Plat Book 'B' at Page 41: AND Lot 20, Block 56, City of Miami South, Plat Book •B' at Page 41, AND Lots 5, 6, 7, 9, 16, the East 28 Feet of the West 125 feet of Lot 15, all of Lots 17 and 20, Block 71, City of Miami South, Plat Book 'B' at Page 41; AND Lots 6 and 70 and Lot 8 less that portion thereof dedicated to the City of Miami, a Municipal Corporation, for *mini -park', and f the West 75 feet of Lot 9, and an undivided one-half 41/2) interest in Lot 9 less th4i est 7S feet thereof, Block 72`rSouth City of Miami, Plat Book 'B' at Page 41, AND All of 1000 erickell, Inc.'s interest in that certain 99 year lease dated June 1, 1952 between Opal S. Neumann, Lessor and Franklin Realty Co., Lessee, as recorded in OR Book 3604, Page 338 and modified by Addenda to the Lease recorded in OR Book 4026 at Page 4910 as per the Assignment of Lease recorded in OR Book 661, Page 447 and Assumption by Assignee recorded in OR Book 6611, Page 443, Dade County, Florida, said demised property legally described ass I The North one-half (1/2) of Lot Two, less the gest SO feet thereof, and all of Lot Three, less the Nest SO feet thereof, in Block 72 South, City of Miami, according to the Plat ereo , as recorded in Plat Book '8' at Page 41 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida; AND Lots 1 and 2 less the Nest five (5) feet thereof heretofore deeded to the Zity of Miami for right-of-way purposes and less the South 14 feet of Lot 1 less the Nest 45 feet and less &I of Lot 2 and less that portion of Lot 1 dedicated to "me -city of Miami, a Municipal Corporation, for 'mini -parka, Block 73, City of Miami as recorded in Plat Book 'B' -at Page 41 of the Publ is Records of Dade County, Florida; AND The South 50 feet of Lots 1, 2 and 3 and the North 50 feet of Lots 23 and 24, and. all of Lot 5, 6, 7, -T -and the North 100 feet of Lot 9 and all of Lots 17 and 18, Block 74, City of Miami South, Plat Book 08' at Page 41, AND Lots 7, 13, 14, 15, 16 and.19, and the Nest 100 feet of Lots 10, 11 and 12, all in Block 86, City of Miami South, as recorded in Plat book •B' at Page-=, Dade County, Florida. s' is All of 1000 brickell;.2nc.4s interest in that certain Lease - Purchase;.Agreeaent''betveen Hattie Carter, Lessor, and 1000 :Drickell*,'.lace OrL-Lessee, dated August 1, 1977 as recorded in OfficiaL'Fasds`?Book,:l784, Page 637 of the Official Records of Dede•Cossatyi'12ovWa,"said demised property legally described ass,71 An: Lot;4,asd Lot 5 less the Nest 10 5 of" Feet, Block 86, :... :Cite of-MiamL•goath, as recorded in Plat BooB' t �- •.Florida. AND .= '`7`•� Lot 12, Block 106 South, City of Miami, Plat Hook "Be at Page 77. Subject=to`-conditions, restrletions, limitations, road -< right-of-s►ays.�andd'easementz of record, zoning ordinances and real 'estatsittazes for ths.year,1982 and subsequent years. ,. ::. 4 Tnissyaaee is gisitn im=oonneetion.-with„the dissolution and igsiidat o Csantor. �'., AWIGNMENT 1 .r COMMERATION of,the itim of Ten Dollars and other good and valuable coesideratioas. the, undersigned does hereby assign unto MAXWELL COLEMAN an undivided ball (1/2) interest in and to 7 ' _ htjuUAWins;descrilsd property: That certain lease executed the )tltb day of May, 1952 by� and bet-eon Opal S. Neumann, a widow, as lessor. s. and the Franklin Realty Co.. Inc., a Florida-corpora on, c - as lessee, which lease is for a period of 99 years: said lease being recorded in the office of tbeClerk of the Circuit Court in and for Dade County, on the 4Ui day ul June. 1952. IN WITH= WHEREOF. the assignor has hereunto set its h..n.l 'and seal at ktisrni. Dade County. Florida, this,�day of June, 195_.. FRANKLIN REALTY CO.. LNC. 'r.......,... _ .b' # Hy. (SEAL) LPrssidcat • `' L7]C` � ilarite Of Dedt r..:'. •of': �►::� ti a...� . lbs utmasa: tmas �dvd tot mcord ee z a., t. 3s4stq+� 19Sa,v 'c • yfc.,.a If*nxoided inOMUL RLCORM �• - - r, �.{�u y - ltssk_G L.T -°da �_��ftk � �'... �_. � _ STA=CW"rLOR=A) SSCleft Gad Cost •- COtl@fT! OZl: DNADE ) .b. LC DLi'Olti hlE the tmdassigned autl►oriq,,personaily appeared MARTIN r' WINKICL52EJiC'ar IIEL,EN L. ALLISON. •respectively as President and Secretary 'of time i>G3i>CL WMALTT CO- V9C., to me personally known, and they arknur-- Ledged befure vie that they executed the foregoing Assignnnent as such officers of sail_ Corpm'iie &ad that they affixed thereto the official seal of said corpor- a •�;ac*rrx= w}iEREOF. I have heron ato seVmy hand and fs ial. seal at TAL%uA.,Dade County. Florida, this �Zday of June, A.D. 1452, Mir eim� of tmm' ` My f.0almiarti0a etlpires +►O� �, i .1Eryi Ota ry 'lam y' 1Q .. rF" dw office at Sze AND JAC( 0.4 gY lh l•� �-. ASSN! Q LLAsi Att� as 1" im Lacer Dade Federal 131d+ �� Fleride 33131 PMVM Al'. PM BY TMZ FUSAMMS, that CZVTRAL MORTGAGE ccx- PAn or @1IAlt2. a corporation existing under the laws of the sca:a of Florida, party of the first part, for and in consideration of the sus of Tim DOLLAn and other good and valuable considerations to it in hand paid by 1000 SiRICECLL. IMC., a Florida corporation, party of the second part. the receipt whereof is hereby acknow- ledged, has granted, bargained, sold. assigned and transferred unto the said part of the second party all of its right, title and interest in and to that certain ninety-nine year lease in which .,aa: S. Newmann. a widow. is lessor. and Franklin Realty Co., Inc.. a Florida corporation, is lessee, being dated May 20. 1952, and f::r.: June 4. 1952, in Deed book 3604, at Page 339 of the Public Rccor:> of Dade County. Florida, said lease covering the property sa::::.:c, lying and being in Dade County, State of Florida, to wit: North one-half of Lot 2, less the Nest 50 feet, and all of Lot 3. less the West 50 feet thereof, in slock 72, Sam CITY or MIAMI, according to the Plat thereof as recorded in Plat book 'b'. at Paqe 41 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, together with all thy, iaprove"nts thereon. SVBJMt.T to taxes for 1969 and subsequent years, con.:: - tions, restrictions and lisutations of record, and mortgage held by Dade Federal Savings i Loan Associa- tion of niant, which the assignee assumes and agrees to pay. To BAV! AND TO H= the same unto the said party of the seco:... part. its successors .and assigns, subject to covenants and coral:_:,...,, contained in the aforesaid lease. IM p1'g s WRZRBW, the said party of the first part has caused these presents to be signed in its name by its du,-., ��Y%i•rp_,YY� Tow,• .�'',%s' — •+}-�.:.#�►�- .. A -g authorised officers and its oorpocate seal to be affixed this day of October. 1%9. . Signed, sealed rnd delivered in the preaencw of3 CEirML MMTGAGE CO:PAEY OF !QApa v �I rzvid"et A to Maxv 11 L ae�an � ATi'EBTv eczeLry As to lortin ne , COQxrY Or DADS Z HAY CSST27Y, that on this day, before me, an officer duly authorized in the State and County aforesaid to take acknowledgments, personally appeared NAMILL L. COLEMAN, as President of CE6MAL M0RT2AGE COMFANY OF MIAMI, a rlorida corporation. known to me to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument and he acknowledged before se that he executed the same. and affixed thereto the official seal of said corporation. and the said instrument is the act and deed of said corporation. 1Pnwas my hand and official noel in the State and County last aforesaid, this�,_day of Q ! ,A.D., 1969. sass amt ITAn of neawl eT WY COMMIS�;IOt, EV19f 5 .. + •'• '74'ary P965- of the State of Florida. - my commission expireat STATE or. rwRIDA covNTY or RADE I HEREBY CERTIFY, that on this day, before me, an officer duly authorized in the State and County aforesaid to take acknowledgments, personally appeared MARTIN FINE, as Secretary of CENTRAL MORTGAGE COMPANY OF MIANI, a Florida corporation, xrown to me to be the individual deacribed in and who executed the foregoing instrument and be acknowledged before mss that he executed the same, and affixed thereto the official seal of said corporation, and the said instrument is the act.and deed of said corporation. MIZms my hand an4 official sal in .the. State and County last aforesaid, tbis�day of ,A.D., 1969. • 10•170. TQ• X60firy pimlo It the Stats qffdt,'� .A: � ..� :': � . �..-.: ••. :�;a�p. � ��� ,�J • Viz! � .. _i9�~�SQii�\\ Dy, - 4 d 7 AssmQ't'IOl[ sY ASSIGHaE The assigaii, 1000 S3tICK =.L, INC., a Florida carpor ition. two by and through.its duly -authorised officers does hezeby,expresely assume and agree topperform each and awry of the covenants of this. lease which are the responsibility of the leasee thereunder. (cot" AtQ(i 1060 SRICKELL, INC. stary . ........ Signed. dealed and delivered in by our p esencell. V:ea Freaid t STATE of rwRIDi1 MUNTY OF DADS 1 . I HERESY CERTIFY, that on this day, before me, an officer duly authorised in thA.Stste and County aforesaid to take acknowledgments, personally appeared James V. Borett. Jr. Vice as/ Fresident,and Sill I,. Spencer as secretary, of 1000 DRZCRELL, IHC., a'Florida corporatloa, known to ms to be the individuals described in and •bo executed,the ^foregoinq Assumption Agreement and they.awawladged before as that they executed the some. and affixed thereto the offiaial 8041 of said corporation. w2•i•HHli my bend and official seal is the state and County last aforesaid, tide II dsy of October A.D., 1969) •+i ��'` `rte/ j'� ! - - ` `Rotary 00 • !lnbllo of the State q Usis ,.'►'',��4 �" r4f oaossieaioosy}p�aM!etilia F .•:�, Q L>R3 FIN -E AND IAGUBSO`t ` Anotoe.s at I e+ loth Floor Dade FM'TA1 P14 • Mwa i. Fl wa 33131 )MOM ALL XZK D7 TSESE PRESENTS. that MAIdfELL L. CO'-r s.N a: _ Am COLEMM, his wife. parties of the first part, for and in sideration of the sun of TEN DOLLARS and other good and valuab:c considerations to thea in hand paid by 1000 BRICKELL, INC., a Florida Corporation, party of the second part, the receipt wcrec_ is hereby acknowledged, have granted, bargained, sold, assigned :..._ transferred unto the said part of the second part all of.:hei: : title and interest in-and to that certain ninety-nine year :ea:t in which Opal S. Nswmann, a Widow, is lessor. and 7rankli.: Roc:::: Co., Inc., a Florida Corporation, is lessee, being dated may 2:,. 1952, and filed June 4, 1952, in Deed Book 3604. Page 336 c` public Records of Dade County. Florida, said lease covering property situate, lying and being in Dade County. State o: to wit: North one-half of Lot 2, lose the hest 50 feet, a:.: all of Lot 3, less the West 50 feet thereof, in Blo,:.c 72. SOL-TR CITY Or MIAMI. according to the Plat thereto: as recorded in plat Book 'B', at Page 41 of the ?uEi- lic Records of Dade County. Florida, together with a:: the improvements thereon. SusJECT to taxes for 1969 and subsequent years, co c.!- tions, restrictions and liaitations of record. and mortgage held by Dade Federal Savings i Loan Associa- tion of Miami, which the assigns* assumes and agrees to pay. TO }-AVE AND TO HOLD the Sams unto the said party of part. its successors and assigns, subject to covenants an,l tions contained contained in the aforesaid lease. = mr:x Si ndEREOP the parties of the first part havo set their hands ane wale this ✓/ S day of October. 1949. signed, sealdd and delivered in the prase Of$ � Maxwell L. Coleman ' oe '_;'�„•; few. C.�..•e., �rvri+. Lam-. - -.. :i ��� �:C il�•r. si �'ti..• ._ _ Sr'' .. _ ._. �. . - 2.'. Ilk Mr., STATE OF FIRM IM COMM Or DADS I HEREBY CEATrY, that on this day; before me, an dfficer duly authorised in the State aforesaid and in the County aforesaid. .to take acknowledgments, personally appeared MAXWELL L. COLEMAN; and ANN COLZMAN, his wife, to as known to'be the persons described in and who executed the foregoing instrument and have acknowledged before me that they executed the same. wiT=ss my, hand and official seal in the County and State last aforesaid this _day of`�Ca'% P� A.D.. 19694 Dlotary P 1}t of the State of Florida r ntLit tt1Tt o4 nems At tA%K My commission expires: ASSUMPTION BY ASSIGNEF. The assignee, 1000 BRICIMLL. Inc., a Florida Corporation, by and through its duly authorised officers does hereby expressly assume and agree to perform each and every of, the covenants of this least which are,the rssaonsibility of the lessee thereunder. 10 siq4yllealod and delivered in our V—rx - Pro" I 1presidAi or F - i - •.S 1 Ir r -+ ._ .. .,_ . �..,_ ...4 .. .. .�.. .... .. _.....r..e•..y.. 0 0. 3., r 4. :?. g� = dZRESY. !Y, that on this day, before me, an officer duly authorised in the •tate and County aforesaid to take acknowledgments, personally appeared James V. Boyett. Jr. Vice B� L. Spencer as/President, and as Secretary, of 1000 BRICXZLL. Inc.. a Florida Corporation, known to me to be the individuals described in and. who executed the foregoing Assumption Agreement and they acknowledged before no that they executed the same, and affixed thereto the official seal of said corporation. Nrnms my hand and official seal in the State and county last aforesaid, this ITth day of October A.D., 1969. Notary Public of the State of Florida A H.wlt, f1M� M no W N 1801%. My commission expiress&W. L 119 1_ i Zara A ty A. alSa d � f ii/E d?r = � ' - .:::;� �-� �,; : � •� -moi.:, . ria «• hcon�� A7 Averr+- w L m 1Gh Boer Dade Fedred W4 - .. Komi FbwW. 33131 � XWWA .:.'si i-sr T=! FRgi=Ts. that_ ClotlRAL MO.RTC-AGE (•C.._ t11zl.OZ MAU. a corporation existing under •ehe lays of ti.e of rlorida. party of the first part, for and in COnaideratio: oc the sus of T= D=JM and other good and valuable ,consioerat:a-s to it in nand paid by 1000 BRIOMM. 33sC., a Florida cor_o:a;.,,. party of•the a part, the receipt whereof is hereby acA..s.- ledged. has granted, bargained. sold. assigned and trans_'erc,... unto the said part of the second party allot its right. t_t:e interest in and to that certain ninety-nine year lea.e in w.. S.'11e+miann, a vides, is lessor, and Franklin Realty co.. .:c.. .. Florida corporation, is'lessee, being dated,May 20, i952. June 4, 1952, in Deed-Back 3604, at Page 338 of t:.c ?'.I�>:.c �•._.::.. of Dade County,.,Florida, said lease'eovering the prope:-t;: ,.;...� lying and being in Dade County. State of Florida. to North one-half of Lot 2, less the west 5o Leet. all of Lot 3. 1esa the 'West 50 feet thereo:. .:r. 72. SOUTH CITY OF MIAMI.. according to the Plat t:.c:1 as recorded in Plet Book 'B', at Pale 41 oc tie Records of Dade.County,'Florida, together .•itn .:.. ._ improverents thereon. SVWZCT. to taxes for 1%9. and subsequent years. c� :.. • - : :ions, restrictions and limitations of record.Ar.. mortgage hold by Dade Federal Savings & Loan Abso:...- tion of Miami, which the assignee assumes Aad ayr.'c.< to pay. TO RAV3C AMD TO HOLD the same unto the said party n: . part, its succeesore and assigns, subject to covenants a:.i contained in the aforesaid lease. IN MlTUM WHEItZCr, the said party of the first pa:: caused theN presents to be signed in its name by its d... I wl:- -1 -- W 1. as is" officers and its Corporate seal to be affixed this 1 day of October, 1969. Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence ofs CZWML MORTGAGE ODlQAsy or IQAIQ v `t _ 2 EXUW-CRIrM 7 that oe tL12 oey, before se, an officer duly authorised in the stat* and County aforesaid to take ackaorledysents. personally appeared 10►W= L. COLEM B. as President of CZrML MORTGAGR COVArr OF MIAMI, a Florida corporation, known tb ay to be the individual described in and vbo azeeuted the foregoing, instrtm eat and be acknmlofted before se that he smeeuted the same, and affixed thereto the official seal of said. corporation, and tfie said instrument is the act and d**d'of said corporation. w27W s ny hand and official seal in the State and County last aforesaid, this—IAY_day of ✓�c.�ab�G A.D., 1969. nnn want n.n P naw.^, n w canttaon U: r✓•. .. •. •�... +...� • •74stary P. 15, of the State of Florida ply commission expires: ry • •'• STATE OF FLORIDA "COUNTY OF DADE I RERESY CERTIFY, that on this day, before me, an officer duly authorised in the state, and County aforesaid to cake acknowledgments, personally appeared MARTIN FINE, as Secretary of CENTRAL monT"Gg COMPAYY OF MIAMI. a Florida Corporation, known to me to be the individual described in and .who executed the fcregoxnq instrument and he acknowledged before NO that he executed the Dame— and affixed thereto the official 0041 0f said corporation, and the said instrument is the act and deed of said corporation. UISMEii my band and official sal in 'the State and 14 County last aforesaid, thisday of A.D., 1969. pophry Public the State ef+'?.lbr-,idr toy eor=Xission aspi:esr F 7: Cu t AMEMU NOR rr 113Q2(1�� }-17 . ,. The assignss, 1000 ERICIC=, xxc., a Florida corporstlon, by and tbrough7its dulVIsItborixed officers does hereby expressly assume and Was to perform each and every of the covenants of this lease which -are the responsibility of the lessee thereunder. to Atm 1000 WICREid,, INC. 9 etary signed.lled and delivered in, Dy our P essmce3 N Preside t r STATE Or FLORIM COUNTY Or OADE I HERESY CERTIFY, that on this day, before me, an officer duly authorised in the State and County aforesaid to take acknowledgments, personally appeared James V. Boyett, Jr. Vic. aa/President.and Bill L Spencer as secretary, of 1000 MUCREI:L. I11C., a Florida corporation, known to an to be the individuals described in and •ho executed the foregoi•.q Assumption Agreement and tbey acknowledged before no that they executed the same, and affixed thereto the official noel of said corporation. 1nUM my hand and official seal in the state and County last aforesaid, this 171h day of Qctober . A.D., 1969. . notary Public of the state of rlo�~ i;_` ' my commission expire=--------om ► iMa an d nmk 9mMM-1.9. IV f no'4�m;- W�.Z�4��E Mammon _ :e:+r'•t�•1Ss-= - a-.- "=1:.V` {r.; _ ,v � ^ _,Y; .. 10. 20 AMD58 aSR402S38 aiG t,30�J WARRANTY DEED THIS INDENTURE, mane this a � day of /t 1986, between Sally N. Bean of the County of Escacmia, in the Statr of Flori1a. Party of.the first pert, and the CITY CF MiAMI, a Municipal Corpuration,' P.O. Boa 336708, Cotonut'i6rove Station, Miami, ?1233-0708, of the County of Dade, in the State -1 Florida.- party lorida;party of the sero:.: part. WITNESSETH, that the said pa:lty of the 'first part. -for and ;.e consideration of the sum of ONE DOLLAR ($1.00) ono other goad and v::,aDle considerations to her in hand paid by the part,of the second part, the receipt whereof is hereby acLnow:ezies, granter, bar,oincd := sola to t—. SaiG..;,:rty of the second part. its successors and assigns, forever, .ne following described land. situate, lying and being in the County of Dade and State, Of Florida, to wit: The external ores of a cir:ular curve having a radius of seven (7) feet and tangents which are Z5 feet' South of ono parallel with the Centerline of S.E. 9th Street and 37.5 feet liesterly of and parallel vita the centerline of S.E. 1st Avenue being a portion of Lot 3 Block 72,S of A.L. XNOWLTO.: MAP OF MIAMI, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Boot 'B• at Page 41 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. This pr„perty does not constitute the homestead of the Grantor. - wf th! firtr part Alec tirlbv felly w errant T W O to said land,, and will defend the, same against the lawful; claims of all persons whomsoever. IN WITNESS WHERtOF, the said party of tre first part .hereunto sets her, hand and seal the day and year above written. Sigiil sealed and delivered in the prtser.,e of us: A x fd 4-1(L V/7 l -pt.- . I SEA_ ) can -ice-- I lur I - -- X J-0AA,4 UHL C: �6� 7.1 Do✓ ,rr' 1i'i Le ��-, PRIUT ADDRESS _e Page.,I of 2 GO`" • err. RM i rum U STATE OF FLORIDA ) COUNTY GF ESCAMBIA) • Be aim M1lol&" I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this day personally appeared before me, an officer duly authorized to administer oaths and take acknowledgments. Sally N. Be an to me well known to be the person described in aro who executesv the foregoing deed, and acknowledged before me that she executed the same freely and voluntarily for the purpose therein expressed. YITKESS my hand and official seal at Pensacola. County of Escaabia.,and S:Qte a' Fl:r da. this 2c !ti .'.sy of �rrnk.`�' • =. :92£. My,:armission Expires:HUIAXT y 1 C1 �%✓ L �' UL.14; � STATE OF F ~ ` 13 APPRUVEU AS .0 FURM AND APPROVED AS TO OESCRIPTION: CORRECTNESS: This Intrument Accepted Pursuant to Resolution Na. 9966 Passed and Adopted (?-214S) fd m Vd.•n.7 R::fit-� p' L3RI� �.i:� C t . CG►i Pale 2 of 2 This Instrument Prep n: by Department of Lar City of mii-Fioriod .. t 1 p Fier 1OFF 97R3239Sj 21 48:% lrs�: 1771 9r0548 1314 7.aim Ave. a •act,:. „i+i jgKT,{ tl,t•Kt i Cabin 33146.Y •'\♦�iJn• •.Mi\I• - Tho Imtra=cw Prepared By . t Atm Fishir. P. A. 1314 ZMhc a'Am Coral f, mbkS FL 33146 (305) 663.3444 Taut Folio No: 01.021174244030 TRUST TRANSFER DEED GRANTOR: Sally w, am berebl GRANTS Im Sally N: Bc36. tnmw of,dte SaOy N. Baa U -WK True daaod July 10. 1947 . wbo reaides at: 6601 Sw 116 Cort. Ap. 104. Miami FL 33173 the follaysrts 4exnDed maj properry in toe Caney of Dads. Stye of R.cr+ : sorb Ore -Half of Loc 2. leas &be Wes[ 30 `x1 thereof, and all of 6x ?• less tcc West 50 feet twee(. Block 72. SOUTH CITY OF ULA -MI. a=vn .y to Je FLu tbcrcof recd, ". '. in Plat' Boot 'B'. at Pa6e 41. of the Pinks- xecor,is of Dade Cotmry, Fkxid+ Street Address of Ptovcm: a00 S.E. Mums Awnue Road. Mtatas, PWsda C.raraor itenebv full- .larrim stte tn'e rn tlee Pro 11 .nd wilt defend ttc satr:e aes+att irfL, clauoS of all per%CW wttomatsvtr. ' . St=ored is the pmence of: i t A-01-t'Z�_� Wiuwu sally •�Y' - ' c 6611 SW ! 16 Cast. Apt. 104 I MCamt FL 33173 . wicaca Primed Nam ed ACKNOWLE33GMUff I STATE tar r's:/:i:aw s^+ sed , CCAJW Y OV D+1DE t " T � ' BEFORE ME prima lly Wp=rW Sapy N. Brae. trtW Well kna.e w me "A kWW a b. 69 ptxwe deacrihed ie ad wbo cawed dw M -V-9 ipsatss —M. a -t- presm d the fntlov.n- pitsyit)satfua reiW trpnn by Mr. _ !_ctrl %ho mctw-;Cd eJ to ital before "K. m►in nsth. Yw raid trwruasma wu etteewaf fur the wrpow-s uwm=,e:pre ud. L3-ej : da at y WITNESS vESS my hard oroiltcW scat rh.r : ? AJaq of % JS-��! ' 1 C.• nor SC all) .i -:••• to L. ••r •r 2U Yql . !� � % � i L% • '�. l � fir. t�.v -+tart v» �r•r __ �1��� 1. -..� � � � /�: �t ••••�•.wt~- : .� No-sey s Sianou" ACYIOfIY.�•la rY MYI•�. - �r�" .a lMt�etYYr-Y.•wr - . •.aGLi4•KaI�P - . WAY RLM11 - •tatM awftsr raver Rema w :f'.: 17719-'.'0548 Nm Fisher 1314 Zahn Are. Carat Gama FL 33146 Tim imtswomt Prepared By: Ams FistKr. P A. 1314 Zaksa Ave. Coral Gabica FL 33146 1303) 665-59" Tas Falco No: 01-02117-020.1030 TRUST TRANSFER DEED 97R��a9$I .S9% J'.Y 21 06:% "afi�;C tfill GRANTOR: Sally N. Aral hemby GRANTS to; Sally N. Hcsn. Tnwae of the Sally N. Bess Law" That dared J* 10. 1997 who etsalca s: 6601 Sw 116 Cana. Apt. 109, Miami FL 331773 the fo0ouwj dewribed real property in the Cotaty of Dade. Sudo of Fords: "forth Ors - Half of Lac 2. las the west M fres thereof. sod all of Lx =, less tri Wca 30 fm trrc:oof. 81wk 72. SOUTH CTfY OF ML114L awxrd-ig to de Pw thereof rrco.4 ' in Plat Book '3-. at Page 41. of me iwbisr kmw b of Dade County. Florida Street Address of Properr: WJD S.E. Miami Avt=w Road. Mures. Florida f.ranor hobby (WI. w"wrame the tn!e to the Prooerry and will defe:4 :te sarr.. sc,tra !a+ful claims of all pervau whnmsoem. Signed in the preacKe of: ACKNOWL DG&OWT Sall) -4 6601 Sw ! 16 C.xs+. Apt. 104 M:ww FL 3? 173 STATE tit' r •wiwiiiw / CrAJN" OP DADE s BEFORE ME perreway appeared U4 N. Oman. c4ty mU kntnrn so as and kww a ba ft persue dsaeribed w nand who esetarad We hftW pi mann =w. or who praemed the frAI& nn*. %iml0ealao rehwd wm by aw. _NW eho arOW-ledrd n NW before me, ander mcb. Yw said wwnwwm wu camped for the papaws thereat capmeed, r WITNESS my Mrd arch o(fx:ia!real th.a `�'AJay of rJ .19 Y . _ ��- 1 aaa nsntr l� ` eta r,[ al1J'M ;nos i �/ ywyt pw nr•M• tl• Aran 1 No-ary s Srgtutwc +t:arwtl M.vw,.` gl..wtl 1. •. .•u•t. aarn n.ww •caaa.a�v.n WAY RLMN •YM Awriar c" wr /� 1 SIR 65127. ' I I O3T _ 882 �y 63 W110 X11 S Z2 FILED F'. . IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF TIE 11TH JOYCE TARNOM/, as Guardiars81 . I0tp L CIRCUIT IN AND FOR '._ of the Person and Property OUNTY, FLORIDA of MARIE CONYNE, Incompetent, rc,:°' c" "GE031RAL JURISDICTION DIVISION Plaintiff. tir.•..: ;Ire a 43nir CMTS ti :L'F �l,t..I1Li10:� CASE NO. 79-14862 (23) VS. BARBARA CBLKA, STIPULATION, ACKNOWLEm,%M1,,;T AND ORDER Defendant. This Stipulation and Acknowledgment executed by the Defendant. BARBARA CELKA, a/k/a BARBARA MAGOSA, and her attorney, STEVE G.`MORRON, JR:; is for the purpose of acknowledging and agreeing to the following fees owed to the, firm of NORROw & MORROW, P.A. so that this document, when confirmed and ordered by the Court, may be recorded as an attorney's lien against BARBARA cELKA's, a/k/a , BARBARA MAGOSAIs. individed'one-half interest in the follow nq' described real property: Undivided one-half interest in Lot 9 less the nest' 75 feet of Lot 9, Block 72-South, City of Miami. according to the Plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book "B", Page 41, of the Public. Records of Dade County, Florida: a/k/a 926-928 Brickell Plaza. 1. The undersigned. nav agreed and hereby acknowledge Gnat a fair azd c•_asonaLle fee fcr defending ane: handlii,g tre instant action is S315G.00, $500,.00 Cf which has :leen paid, and here.,v requests the Court to award arid verify tris amount as the fee for the Deferdant's,attorney in the. above styled cacse. 2. The undersigned r-efendant and her atterrey also request the Court ze ack:.cw1edge that t%re Defendant owes her undersigned attorney a balance of $6703.00 for services' rendered in previous prccocd rgs involving 'thL sauce property as aDove uescr-ibed far which the urdersig :cd atter :�.y has not a._:: Paid. WHEREFORE and °n• reason of the above. the undersigned request the Court to take judicial notice of the fact that a total' balance of S9350.90, is dL,:.jrd owing to the und0signed attorney and- request the Court t= order that this Stipulation and Acknowledgment be recorded az an attorney's lien against the'Deiei,dant's oro-half, interest r the ai,ove descriced property so tnat. in the event the. G0-� i aE 11037 ► 883 said property is sold, this lien will be and must be saeisfie>d out i of the proceeds of said sale• if not satisfied prior to a said sale by the undersigned Defendant. • G. MORROW, 'JR. r` BARBARA CELLA a/k/a BARBARA MGOSX !SORROW & MORROW. P.A. t : i ORDER t t THIS CAUSE havinq come on before me on the above Stipulation . and Acknowledgment, and ix+th the above parties having appeared, , and the Court having had an opportunity to acknowledge the signatures of the parties who have signed the said document in the Court's presence. and the Court being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is hereby ORDERED that this Stipulation and acknowledgment and Order shall be recorded with the Clerk of tite Circuit Court of the llth Judicial Circuit as an attornr-y-s 1icr, %:ntil the said total balance of attorney's fees in the mount of 39350.00 have been paid to MORROW &MORROW, P.A. by BARBARA CELi:;, a! :!a 13ARBARA MAGOSA, out of the proceeds of any sale of the following described property: Undivided one-half interest in Lc* 9 less the west 75 feet of Lot 9, Block 72 South. City of Miami, according to the Plat thereof as recorded in Flat j Book "B", Page 41. of tite Public Records of Dade County. Florida; a/k/" 926-928 Bricrc ll Plaza. and/or until suea time as a _occrcicd satis.acti..:: o= this !ion is re-flected in tae Public R^cords of Dade, -riot:da. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami. Dade County. Florida,' this day at Marcit, 19dl. f• �7AIL OF FLORIDA Cr fors • ••t/(.• VVI n OF O?uE ! • UIT JUDGE r Mtkr 1,-v CCRflPY rear rtir ,o r en ern tr.r•. i_rrtre ? ° y Cr'^ :! o ;�+( r' RIC: CLtf Cit r red fo !y •, �FyJ �...••�� "`�° a'p URI\Gi:R. curt Rl at � Sly C*A.6•r csrrr - •- �.; - -. - ter= ~'' � AM al EES 23 01 87ROGS776 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT.OF. THE 11TH�C� 7 1J��/Pb�L�S JUDICIALAND FOR DADECOUNTY, FLORIDA GEKERAL,'JURISDIC,IION CI t':S.O`: CASE `0.:.8(-11389 27;' JOHN SKLADNIX, Plaint IFF. r•+ m vs. :.` ,v G.'.F:.UIt ,'.%AL J::D:7iEVTs .� BARBARA MAGOSA a/k/a BARBARA CELKA,. - Defendant. THIS CAUSE came before this Court on the Mction 'for Default Final Judgment filed herein by Plaintiff, and the Court having examined the pleadings and the .affidavit,i file herein, and the Court being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED That Plaintiff, JOHN SKLADNIK, recover from Defendant, BARBARA MAGOSA a/k/a BARBARA CEL KA, the sum of S (C) �S7�j�—,with cost in the sum of S i py.,j0 ., all totalling S /0, 396.bSr which shall bear interest in the rate of ( 7 i per,cenr per, annum unti'1, paid,' all for which let execution issue. DONE AND ORDEREr in Chambers at Miami, Dade County,. Florida 'this / day of 1987. UoIRLUIT COURT JUUUE cc: Larson and Jones Barbara Magosa.a/k/a Barbara Celks SIirE J: ROi11L)A j COUMTY OF DADE 1 NERI 97 CEO)Ift L%a low tomWwq K •.fines and correct copy of enc CWV" on we W Ire, ants - wIrHEss r" haw amt Ono.# sea# Ru%/ rT . Of �•1. . Jl Q 19 R1C:if-P6; P. 85INKER CLEnrC, Cucu-1 .rnd Luunly Courts By I Deputy, Per- �', a AM t981 FEB 26 P'� 3 24 81 R 013 8 DEC. 13193*;3539 IN THC CIRCUIT COURT OF i►11 11111 JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AuD FOR DAUE COUNTY, FLORIDA GENERAL JURISDICTION DIVISION CASE NO.: 86-06831 (13) EUaARO OCHEJ, Plaintiff, O3,� v r vs. DEFAULT FINAL JUDGMENT a Q BARBARA MAGOSA a/k/a v o BARBARA CELKA, r_ , v Defendant. THIS CAUSE came before this Court on the Motion For Dcfault Final Judgment filed herein by Plaintiff, and the Court tloviny examined the pleadings and the affidavit on file herein, and t►Ir Court being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it in ORDERED AND ADJUDGED 1. That Plaintiff, EDWARD OCHE1, recover from Defendant, r BARBARA- MAGOSA a/k/a BARBARA CELKA, the sum of s y� p��, s—a with cost in the sum of all totalling S ,nhich shall hear interest at the, rate of 7.s a[. per cent per annum until paid, all for which .let execution issue. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at this -% 0 day of cc: LARSON AND JONES BARBARA MAGOSA a/k/a BARBARA CELKA ... .. n .•..�I � .� ttilOt Iles Rt( I -RD C. B1llNKr'i 1 • .—'• I Miami, Dade County, Florida , 1987. $taj 1, -",— STATE OF il.041UA i COUNTY OF DAOE ) 1 MCMI bF ri ,, Ily► MO gaftnains C.r.K, �. oy q the 004.W 0.Ift N a t►w alt/ In A. lSttlMrtER • rY / •y r•C.17/.� Utwury b GOUNjy 0i IV i yi ,6 awsapttiw! ...,..w, Otto "3k-. IRLTry C3&lli4~, maoseco roe- of • am as 1561 Stsnswt Drive 1�ti11 JU==nn / pp�� aroi, F3arirla 33143 iEC f 55r; 2-480 j' 9 1R 1899 15 1941 JUW 06 11!57 T>b arremramr Propane Or. { Carl Di BetTatdO, Eaquire 4( a a.rA 8603 S. Dixie Hwy., :Sa=te 210 OOCSTP-DEE O,EO SURTAX 0.45 Miasai, Florida 33143 11ARSHRLL AGER. CLERK CAGE COUNT7r FL R7pm�r. 4aRsetars !'oleo tOesG['tstlee tFdb} Nstatrr(s}: 01 02070-201C70 Qr.imma1s; ss 041- . even AWO TIM Lose w ►A'..- == 3a lista arose Imes sat tM n>l>arst DAIS .anla,a•,• s� }•.... •V .•.� n..• r••" a.e ' w+nd ssn7- i0 ..Dial•air 1a.w.• r•al . • mnw. .aC �� M rM•r�i. SAI Jr www• ead someopoes M a�r��a�\ J•w�io-Jr iww• .. 1 Oen• P wq..w• Iit1S der. of May .4. D. '7991 1� ��tlalf:�.'a colts x. SC]htJLZF., a married ran . • as..• ('..n.•ta .a tixtt^ art the Clotty o/ Ploi ilia pa -y of the first Dart. and 1000 MUCKS=.. L39., Florida limited ip��� 33/3/ 1 • e»o0 13...E no ti- C ..utas. Dade ,n I .Slaty. ofzri: r•Jwso peat of ev "dress Le tsar• a.• ....1 @..r: ��NaLilrSDe Thnt d•. .ltd peps y 01 the first part. for and of nonmtdwasson of the sum of Tan Dollars and 00!:09 (S10.00) b other good mid valuable ommadamtiom Dollars. 1 to :-i= ars hend pad law the sand part y a/ rlw second oerr, Ileo sawrpe "Jarsol4 hwebp oehnotwl• .alpecf leave otanard. haroasnpA and sold so the said party of tis. second port. its %tabs on l asswes, impre er t1.- f.sllr..s•anp drrrnbrd • land sats.ate. and bring In the Count? of - tkLt1e . Statr of Florida to was .. .. srabe0l0 /asbI Kiat &ICCCLEM 10" d Deer Cows. "Co - • .,.-. a#MOMstan•tj . Ivt 8, Sl=k ,•/1, StXXM, x_31 -Y OF 141APHaccording to CfelA of C/rCJi! d County .4 the Plat thm-aof, as.. recorded in Plat PCOk R at Page , COLM ` 41 of the Public Renords of Dade C owty. Florida. 7iffS IS A' CMVUtECPIVE OM 70 A SM=30R 0 EMOR QJ CHUG'INAL LM I=DlOM •31\} OFFICIAL MMRDS a= 15029 at PACE 1953. of the Public Records of lode t'.our.ty, Florida. And the, said partyof Ow fbst Pondoes lnersbp feUY w -arrant liver tater to mad. hand and toll! defend the nanny aQusnss the hateful ehessaas of all s.e:Jeru uhontsosat► le Tire' amid pori y of the lane p"t hath hewnanto awl huS hand and seal Am dor and War Isms eabom un etrw SaQnd. ,iwsinddrlts.essst +w tfae plrMnes• oj• , lI s:,ri Or rLURto,.='.J+. ctLedo+ r .: � tI• - -'• � 1 !lLRLEI CLR71" than oq; t\b:'.r �Le.�t►a!• ofhtes d..!• a•.thos.eed as ow'b•s•e selowmad and m she Cleat% stosw.d to tar eslsolw�ta�- +sass H. _ CHM TE, a ngwried mess s j : CL $a a► fnM.n..to M .ar pro=='mews.bed .r. •rad rt.•- nl/.baro oke baeeq .a a.»ssuaamena and 1�"`•se�ld . bolos. nay Herat � em►rwrd s►r eyg� M7T%LSS ws band and stim,a,l ws! in nA- C~s. mad Some, asst ilorrtud the 31st dal tf j`e;CX1-4 . 11 ^ D 19 my IC mmission Emcpirttrai � d Z1 ' NOTAWY /ug 0 trra,7t or r A t .-s+a �1, ... ._ . ?. s me ie i:' tal'caast. to.saa �.a Sia.'r7t s0{,1>QLs: ia•• a. laisaant �,••••�� • tio•o® lases tat.ra •r w . . �I ' I I p I ` This instrument prepared b}- Fernando Ganda Adorno be Zeder. FA Suite 1600 2601 South Bayshore Drive Miami. Florida 33133 Parcel Identification No. R t:1794M113 01-0207-010-1230 STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED THIS INDENTURE is made as of the /i day of January. 1998. between BRICKELL COMMONS, LTD., a Florida limited partnership ('Grantor') and 1000 BRICKELL LTD., a Florida limited partnership ('Grantee'), whose permanent address is 1000 Brickell Avenue. Suite 1200. Miami. Florida 33131. WITN SSETI+ That Grantors for and in consideration of the sum of Ten and Nov 100 Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration to them in hand paid by Grantee. the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, have granted. bargained and sold to Grantee, their successors and assigns forever, that certain parcel of land lying and being in Dade County. Florida, more particularly described as follows: Lot 21, in Block 71 S. of MAP OF ML-'uMl CO.. FLA., a subdivision. according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book B, at Page 41. of the Public Records of Dade County. Florida (the 'Property'). SUBJECT to zoning, restrictions, prohibitions and other requirements imposed by governmental authority-, restrictions and other matters appearing on the Plat or otherwise common to the Subdivision; public utility easements of record; and taxes for 1998 and subsequent years. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same unto Grantee in fee simple. AND Grantors do hereby fully warrant the title to cite Property and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whornsoever. IN Wr7?4 SS WHEREOF, Gri-ttors have executed this indenture as of the day and year first abort written. Signed, scaled and delivered BRICKELL COMMONS. LTD., a in the presence of. Florida limited partnership By. Terremark Brickell 111, lne. Florida corporation, as general partner Br - Manuel D. Niedirta, Pm%ldertt.. . d•�' Address:zsat lam. i,`-IkysAoa P,. - rGalL e -M il)tIRTHOttsE TOWER Loc a Ior •1C: ! 6360rr0907 y4R230424 191;4 MAY 11 14:00 IC K A h 3 L.l� i+ir.:l THIS INDEN7'd)M Made this Ci k'Vday of May, A D., 1944, Between V.T.R. REALTY, INC. a rwWa Catpor**m (Fedorstl 1D No. 634.i04110), of the County of Dade. in tjh4 State of plorida. Pa of thf first pafu whose post office address is Zalr% ` b, Yin v W?S . and Fi7TIPALDI EXBCL)17VE CENTER INC., (Federal ID No.45 <:"d 7c+r- J. ) a Florida cOrp°rat#0n. of the County of Dade, S to %T Flwida. whose post office address is uCiU �# �Pn �U M• t:..r w fig u e• ..l 't5 9 v Parry of the second past: twbaewr sea bmk sow wee 95Wa wry ass 3e® fir)' ,ba W VWWW repel. a"a 0 -OL. W- Vol -V--- a" &000 of +adLW sat., ass Aa aan�— &" asoma dpr. orso.hae.�i 'ar area Inair b �eQum ) ` WITNESSETH. That the said Party of the first part, for and in consideration of the sum of Ton Dollars (S10.M io hand paid by the said Party of the second part, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged. have granted bargained, and sold to the said Parry of the second part. their, heirs and assigns forever. the following described land, situate. and being in the County of Dade State of Florida. to wit: Lots 4 sad 5. is Block 72, SOUTH. CM OF MIAMI. according io the Plot thereof as seeoeded in Plat Book °B' at Page 41 of the Public RerAnds of Dade County. Florida Folio 101-0207-02:' 1010 W STVDEE 1.624.*j SURT1 1r215.00 xaiVEr RLWIMr W19 OW (0WTrr FL S-TWF—C T TO, I. Conditions. reestrictioas, limitations and casements of record if any. 2 Taxes and assessments for the Year 1994 and thereafter. And the said Party of the fust part does hereby fully warrant the tide to said fa4 and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. IN WITNESS VVHEREOF, The said Party of the fust part has hereunto set his hand and corporate seal the day and year first above written.�aao/arerrtw-6068010 mo.M'sow..oaoaeor rw�•w+s Signed sealed and delivered V.T.R. REALTY. INC. "aw aTl1Y1>r. is the pe0at of MCA amb >< �' Wk=" Musca wraea Wknm Vl "Is 40, ..tySecvetse�� . moi~ 1 . v O r, , STATE Or FI.ORMA COUNTY OF DADIK ) I H>ERmw CfialI", that on this dsyr before me. an u in the Sate aforesaid and in 00 C RMY aforesaid to talew VH". MR 84LAAM, Fnm6daat of V.T.R. R&LLTY. tNC. produced bis drivers liceaae as ideatfticstiue sa�d �o di WITNESS my baud sad official seal this This insuumeat watt ptepated by: Manuel M. Arnsu. P.A. 20100 S. Dixie 1iwy.. Suite 101 Miami. Florida 33133 NOTARY PUBUC STATE OF FLORIDA �J a poccaMnr 9 A52784 1941 DEC 26 15208 8:153Z4�6 356 -. QQZT CLAYIS DEZD O.C(STPOEE u.60 SU911 •),,3n nA�SWAL1 AGER. (LUK OAGC (Ou141.► FL TSIs QVXT CLAIM DEED made by VICTOR BALSiAm, a single man herein called grantor, to V.T.R. REALTY, IDIC., a Florida corporation whose postoff ice address is 1756 Espanola Drive, Miami, Florida 33129 herein called grantee; •YYNa88ET8 that grantor, in consideration of Ten and No/100 ($10.00) Dollars and other valuable consideration, receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, hereby remises, releases' and gtitclaims unto 'the grantee all the right, title, `,interest., claims .and demand which.the grantor has in and to the following' -described real property it Dade County, Florida; Lots 4 i S of CITY Of MIAMI SOUTH, according Ito the Plat thereof as recorded in Plat cook E, Page 41, or the Public Records of Dade County, Florida TO BA?8 AND TO BOLD the .Gaza together with all "and'. singular the appurtenances thereunto belonging or in anywise, appertaining, and all of the estate, right, title, :interest, and claim whatsoever of the grantor, either `iri law or lin equity,' tc'the only proper use, benefit, and behoof oC the granted and grantees assigns forever. *(SEE MARGIN) IN !YTNESS WMUMA9, grantor signed and sealed this dead on/ / /r, December, 1991.%0 S i delivered. itG1iTYAi V%C3'OR BALSAM M2.1 0 ave tj is �% i 1756 £12anol3 Drive. Miami, Florida !t tug pa? COLIC! &WNSS , EaAe.es � C�•c.rdi� Pousm 1:0Yflit STATS OF FLORIDA con3my or D=a Z ZZRZNT esRTXF! that on thisday before me, an officer duly authorised in the State and 'County aforesaid to take acknowledgements, personally appeared VICTOR RAISAX, a single man to me known to be the person described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknovl erare me that he axeeuted the same. 1;ZTWZa8 my hangoh' i s l said County and State last aforesaid thi,4 !_ a De ember, 1991. r.1 -7 my commISSION EXPIRES: THIS INSTRUMMT WAS PREPARED BY: Manuel K. Arvesu, Esquire GA1l8, Dixon i SHAPIRO 2663 South Hayshore Drive, Suits M-103 Coconut Grove, Florida 33133' Telephones (309) 854-6666 r LAFLGE R: � or o•w co+� uCC.• .1Ig'w rte�4 c� deenit i OROS CAOft --' r ta: tedpr Jfa1f411RYa41eN taaa0ad anwoON Ttds Qaftwwossot IAgttsd W aero.• 1 • r: r PTaOam APrsltea Paul Ilandfiessm V40110 lla11kw(s)• wast Amee Tm Lm no comes s m DATA a.►aaN-ti Oa.ia err. herPrnofser .galled IIID rerntol.•.. Mel.•. w.•1 1...- . . . r. - r. ..i .w e,..�. • 1 arsa mart Visa Un last elco"1014 eat► - U.�i� .ritt. S T9arr31 ty Bttd Anil.• Il.r sits. •.i July t IJ 144 91 by JAY W. LOTSP=CR, a married run, and r.DwARD R. rcr, a, merrierd Pwn hers•enallet .sUe,d the, rt,n•rlur to FITTIPALD7 r.XDCUTiVL CrNTr•R, INC., a Florida corporation n•h•ssr puslestloe addr+,r 1. Oad1 So. Miami Rvvasui, 'llosmi . ricride i f l it herPrnofser .galled IIID rerntol.•.. Mel.•. w.•1 1...- . . . r. - r. ..i .w e,..�. • 1 —1 I.r• 4..1 r,r.. .• • . • • • • .Iv �.•. .... MI • .•« .•1l..•NI.,..•w. r``r��it•. ?Ata Mtthr 1-I .. # 11..• •orn.O." lose .11.11 N. . •.1.•.. h ,Nr••.,. •.l filo .soon .el it In • on and Other I•alloalele• 1 sne"i"rastwom or. N1/.1 II iN 1.•..1 1. 1..•,. 1.♦ ... 1 ...... 1• J..•.1 t ...... on ./ea.le♦ 1Mly.sen. roll/ airerl/ re, a11/rs, 's -leases duage" a..II ...nlslM♦ Holt•. 1)... ./e 111.1•v N11 11...1 ..•r1 ... s1 leel/l sete.nle on Dare County FlnroJor tea Lots 22, 23 and 24, Block 71 South, of CITY OF MIAMI, according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Nat Hook Be Page 41, of the Public Records of Dade County. PluriSZ lc/Rx those portions of Lot 24 conveyed to the City of Miami by Official Records Book 13728, Page 3076. ' Subject to conditions, limitations, easoments and restrictions of r ecor d. The foregoingpproperty is commercial property and is not the eitI homestead of her cantor. The residence address of JAY W. LOTSPRICH is 4415 Sabal Palm Road, Miami, Florida and the residence of NDWhRD H FSB is Everglades House, 2000 S. Ocoan Drive, Apt. 1110, Fort Lauderdale, Florida. Toot " with ell the tenements. herrr/1tangetsts and op►.nrlran/o s sherrlo hrlong.ng or /n any u.bPapForr8ainttlep Tws� �w� 3O %me asses t NOW, /IN sane in lee ssrnpl. fwre•P► Nnd the Brenta. As— he e,asaaants with sold pun#~ shat the, grontew in ion4 ellr wised a/ said fond en lose, elrnple: deet the grantor has 90061 fight anti lowlael arethetrtr to so -if na.l dons so .....1 Fiord 81.at the prunlw hon by fully t•arr.snts the title, its said fund snot so -ill dofrred the sewee. against Sits lau•fal ,lames of all p ra'"la a•hoaesesor•er. and that solrl land is free of all eons ourebrenres. •/repo Samos at�rtynq,�y�y{ et to l )re, rrrllw•r It. to rare • . • 1 .....•Ja LI, > C. -Lull i '•ostnty Clswts site saeJ uwaloe loos :egnr.i sold sea" these llrr,drnls the, Jar asset gra• first aiIow u -Wilson s/rpsed. and dooinw on at serwe r � R phi' 7/Y .:. r' i L JAY TT.� st'4TF 81+ FLORIDA cor%:TY its DApr 1 IIZRCBV CrItIlry that ere ergo. ds. +.taro amt, an olfurr Joh a.,hrr.r.A •� it. ba,. /l..t.ra.d and ,n thr t'•.oag. alarrssed. to stoke atkasl,de•nrns, prrssaalh apprarrd JAY H. LOTFP=Ctt, a harried mar, 411.4 COWAPn H. FT.L. a married .ten all me, Ino..a to 1.. .H P"".n g rirtr.l..d re, anA rhe rtvtogrd tM la,seaaa laen.nern.t and thev arkreom.lsdasd brta,r I.Ir that they es_,Yly.r•dd less torn. �y��� WITM935 It :'IZ' t».atd'aLty AL .lg ad last Isa1 slorrssed Pits t1F� des r J my j aiAMWM 6mf� / �! f earcon"a op tis iia h Ad • sou R .� ai UK (endow Aw4d* uses 100mpld Ake) 11 . Tali tlMbalOaat Now K IL. . ANON=, 1 r• � property Aptalstrs Paw itwat"Waltsm Vona) Namkuts)• sna AMA TM Law tai s==Wn ane ! S 1 024 1 . i.� woo Awn Tue. use #OR No tr.a aiu °�__ �_6 �g J .spa. �'li� lsar a* iia{ �Jn/1.• a.. .l°,. .4 July .1 IJ tV ql by . JAY W. XAMPETCH, a married man.. are! EDWARD H. MIT, a ffarried man 'at.. . .% .... \ • . .. . ... .. , . . i .. . . hrrr,nulleg ealleJ lea- nrn°thrr IN p2TT1pALD7. EX=UT1VE CL`?iT13R, 111C.e a 9rlorida corporation 1.•Itu.e twflYllf.P edami • e.. CW60 So. Miami Aveena, 11iwni . Yleirade '411 11 . 4metnsof le► called lee teranl-w - Mt...•.. .....i 1..... ..� .... .41 ..r eNM• w •Y. •• 1..J - �tAa���IttM `(`l.��,r_t�w. 1...1 •.IN. • •N • 1 • • • •. • .41 r..1 ..�• .�1 • «I�.•••.IMA• . mtnm <eta, •: e.8l dlu• •1/onhN l..r IItod ..I J II.e •soon ort t In • on and Olde., 1.O1Y0111. / IDn°Nle/etlt.al IM NII+. 11 IM /....1 I. l•.•I. I•\ •Ir 1 rN.N J• •J.N .J .)...@A.% mortal. ime.1.811.• •elle alleges re, ae/,e., IPlN0/Pt IWI#I.O• a...l .•II.lso'm% lost#., II,.• .tIN.8Iry •Ill lJ•r.l •.•►1.1.11 IOIId •It 1l.,le In Dalfe County 11.8rtele 1#: Lots 22, 23 and 24, Block ?1 South, of CITY OF MIAMI, according to the Plat thereof, • a s r ecor did in Plan. Hook 8, Page 41, of the Public Records of Dade County, P1urida, lona those portions of Lot 24 conveyed to the City of Miami by Official, Records Book 13728, Page 3078. ' Subject to conditions, limitations, easements and restrictions of record. The foregoing property is commercial property and is not the homestead of either grantor. The residence address of JAY W. . LOTSPEICH is 4415 Sabal palm Road, Miami, Florida and the residence of EDWARD H FEE is Everglades House. 2000 S. Ocean Drive. Apt. 1110.Fort Lauderdale, Ploridr. T 09tum Y•1t11 all the- tegnowtPnes. i#PaPf/11oanPrlda end ap/Nrrlraan. Ps Aerelot �I+riw+glnp up in anr,' u•toP7app e►1e1a1#1g 1® A" to IW O aw sane /n lvr' sarnple JwPrer "d te. eroach► Im *he ros.ssrants rrtte reale grantee that dw gronl..r as ioerfielJf sosesul of aeerl cared on lee aUwple: deet flee grarelor den good ►spiel ami.1818-6641 o#dlYwtfr lu sell an.l / aN/ .v ..,.l Ls d flat #lir gronlar hereby jolly #servants the 1111e l.8 said lured end sued Jofroid tee sewse, against the 1".1"I dawns of ail pP►a°seu Y•hommoos•er. and the! easel lane! is Is" of all one #anbronres, eseept teres' to 1a•. 4-rn1wr 31. 10 yin• .I 1 ,•.•••J. b '3ostnq t'Nllfl� • A. 601J esrog1.81 dee :#Used and ,paled the,P' t.resonf, tee Jay u.fd rear ftHf allow Y•r11leA �espaesl. eyed 4&1" rn prrssonrs. Iir yiv, �- •' i L JAY TOM if -V/ sl'ATF s i; noR1DJ► f nl"�TY a ti . y�eDp t lttlll bti czal lry that Pa shop da. Mose ar• as olfue+ d..l� a.11.:,rfeA 1t, cut. ad and In she t••wwe. a/wr"Id. w take aeks►.atlria.nenn, peroo..all\ asprsred JAY W. LOTFAEICH, a Porried man, anA LDwA1tn H. ".z. o married nion w me inoan w i+ •M polo. n'S i4rr•!rd on and .she Pareused thv to. etas lastrulowni and !'hev ukno+lsdsed before saw Nut they -rive-d ter I$~ q . WtT49gso IM.al�ryf.yfj[tC i01p�`atrd Stats len a/aaerld sero t1EK. �t .f 7_A� J my 7.'J 9 sty eeltnaW ou tlmmal - L g° w. Joe a1 sora 0�� "oileii.�ja �i� COCATIOl1 — .%� S A C :.. •] mlPR7 CLMK. CIamIT oaaT Prepared by: Carl Di Hvrhhardo, L&q, 8603 South Dixiv Hwy,Suite 210 MiaMi, FL 33143 R•• L u rn Lo; Ft'l t.• No. 0I-Ut-07-U10-1J10 01-02-07-U1U-1020 1 X93 !':;,931 VERSL11AL REPkESENTATIVE'S DEED THIS 1.4L#E rJKL, elxvcuL•:tJ Lhu arAay of m- 1993, between JOSEPH G. SCHULTE, c+f 5758 S.N. 42 Terrace, ri ami, Florida 33155, Personal Representative: of the CaLate of GEORGE H. SCHULTE, deceased. Party Party of the F1rAL Part, and F i'mPALDI EXECUTIVE CENTER, IYC., a Flori.la corporation, of yam• �,• . hl• 1)..1.,, - /�...,..'. , , /�..)•.,. i /•+w..l. �� �,. Party of the Second Part. WITNESSEM The party of the First Part On the e-22,' lay of may, 1993, pursuant to authority granted by the Will and the Florida Probate Code, Section 733.811 and Section 733.813, and in consideration of the premises and thw sum of TEN ($10.00) DOLLARS, and other good and valuable consideration in hand paid, grants, bargains, sells, aliens, realises, releases, conveys and confirms to the Party of the Second Party, and to its heirs and assigns ferevur, that certain nal property situate in Dade County, Florida. and more part icul 'ar described as follows: Lnts 1 and 21 in Block 71, South of CITY OF MIAMI, according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat book "B', Paye 41, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. SUBJECT TO taxrs for t:•..t yc.:r 1993 and eubsequont years, restrictions, reservations, limitations ahi.i else-103nLA of record, if any, and all applicable zoning ordinances TOGETHER WITH all and singular the tenements, hvred itamTents and appurtenances belonging or in anywise appertaining to that real property. TO HAVE AND To HOLD the same to • he Party of the Second Part, and its heirs and assigns, in fee simple forever. AND, the Party of the First Part doo- covenant to and with the Party of.. the Second Part, its heirs and assigns, that in all things pre- liminary to And in and about the sale and thhis conveyance, the orders of the above-named Court and the Laws of Florida have been fellowoei and complied with in all respects. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Party of the First Party has not his hand and %eat on the day and year first above written. 5hgned.. sualetd and e1ivororvd in L ihai prepe:nee .,pt s STAT. o4,FLA)RIUA ) )ss: CUUUTY Of' UAUt ) JO!;l:P V SCiltJLtnt. Perhsonal Re pre:sentat hvu of thv kjLaty -t GKORGE H. SCHUI.Tl: I IffA RY CEKr1 FY that on thin day wraeandi l C O , 188 y aypeareh.i be:Eory 0 ..,..ar,tt'&h L USUtuhhwsou. YA. sww~- w►Vii.a...s s' saw a,tunas e.a0o•now acUss fstbi,..rr,. ":O.a.a.1•Ism 410400ft � tJ .. pel �� O eya L i LOCI I0/ r w C 7 1593 I P�3932 Oral, an of_icer Elul suthori-ed k% minister oaths and take acknowled jementsik.; a- Aq j.-01- O JOSL'rn C. SCHULTE, as erdo*esal Representative of the Estate of C.F.ORCS H. SCHULTE* duccas0d, personally known to me, and who did take an oath, did execute the foregoing Deed, and acknowledged before me that he executed thv same freely and voluntarily for the purposes theiein expressed. _+ WITNESS sa_• hand and official seal at Miami, Dade Coanty. Florida, - tnis ;.Ixay of __--__, 1993. AOftRY PUBLIC, State O{ Florid t Lar9v My commiss icer expi ress w�+ t �� •r. ��Y ewet � ' !� a axis eNae�ew AMM arnueao..o+.rane�ur •� . asar.e•ene - :tAN�tY R11NN -1- ue■o�ae�l:netLpiHrftseasssv.l•A er.•eeo••+r�v�o•+."vow.vRef�oeane�•w�evtinwas�••r•wnm.ao•.a��••e•• - PLC 1rArc 843 . I 9780916 1 1 1497 C.Afr e3 1;:S5 LUES A CONSVF. U. ESQ. 7211 K.W. 42nd MOM Mora+. Fhwda. 71126 :STh1Ti IWTkG 2t&W.N) WAk4ET R dlHe CLE" DAU (GLKTfr FL AMORTGAGE DEED THIS MORTGAGE DEED. executed this a7Y L day of ./ 1997, by and between FTTTWALDY EXECUTIVE CEstiM INC- is F7erhk eorporsdon' n er called the MORTGAGOR which teraaas used m every masoeesball include the Marsgagor's executors. urea. successors. legal representatives and assigns. either voluntary by act Of the pubes. Or itnrokmtary by opemdoa of law, and shall denote the shaptkr and/or plural, and the rrasauliuc and/or knit hwe and a WNW nobler artificial paeans. whenever and wftereva the exnaaz to rupirrs of admits. patty of the fust pas. in.fivat of OCEAN BANK, a sate banking m'I -ice, a; successors cad ssstgtts, haeitstmr called the BANK. WITNESSETH. that for divas good sod valuable ewsidas:ioss, sad to seeure.rhe payment of that certain Promissory Nofe in the amount of ONE MII.UON FOUR HUNDRED THOUSAND AND NO/100 (SiAW.000.00) DOLLARS exewrod by the MORTGAGOR in favor of the BATIK lobe tars PROAIISSORY NOTE as ha eafhet used &MR denote the angular. if one Naso, or the plural. if snore than ace Note is atasaad by this Monpge). together with mum abaeoeAnd all other sums of money socn:sd hereby as hmn after pm►idsd. the MORTGAGOR does pas, WPM sell blies. stasis=4 teieotd. ceevey, ofd ccullirm Irmo the BANK in feesimple. the following dnaibed real massa of whieb the MORTGAGOR know sriasd and possessed, and in atsttal possas�= snare m the Ca -My of DADE. Stan= of Florida. so -wit: Lots 4 aid S and the West 30 feet of Las 1.2 and 3 in Black 72 SOUTH. C17Y OF DGA1hII. according to the Phar thereof. as recorded in Pis Boort W at Page 41, of the Public Recoza of Dade Canny. Florida. - AND - lots 22.73 and 24. Block 71. SOUTH. CITY OF MIAMI. aemtdirlg m the Pig tbeseof. as rcoorsod in Pin Book 8 at Page 41 of the Public Recorda of Dade County. ty. Florida. LESS the Fast fm (5) feet of acid La 24 and the esautntal am of a tdrenla Curve eo>esve to the Mordrava having a radius of t razy-five = fax and taugms which are twenty MS) few North of and pendW whtb do canoofioe of Southwest loth Street and thirty (30) feet West of and psrallel WM the t tatesiine of South Mi -rd Avenue. THIS IS A FIRST MORTGAGE GIVEN TO SECURE THE PROMISSORY NOTE IN THE AMOiJNT.OF SIA00A00.00 GIVEN BY MORTGAGOR IN PAYOR OF TIE BAML TOGErMM with all strsstuea and Improvements new and hesadla on said land. and me f =w= s aacbed thereto: and the easme w, r'I ice std Ilumal tigbaa and appmramocss dmeonso belonging. or in my vise spperatining: sod aII tam. imus, proceeds and Pevfss sating 00 ro eccrve from said ptQaises; and A pis and t c=k fittsmra. bearers. air 001011W011ft apdpesmt. machinery. boiler. tangs. Ckvateas and motoas piambWg fhmtes and hnrsw- window wean. saxes doors. venetian biimda. tterm shtmas sod ammp. pool pamtgs and racers and all otba basing. 000lliAg. teMge mfna, pk=bbog. waft. vesailums. irripft artd pones systema and appliances whish ase now IF may bassftes pertain to or be used with. in or ce mid promises though they sW be esba daadodd or dwadWblc. TOGEMElt with an drsftutme f misbiept. fixtures. and aqui -am, , in or aFpunenaor to said prsadun, or which wary bacaleer from time to time be PWW therein and any wbubursoa or MIAScmaa thcreof. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the a=. togatbef with :he amemexas. hertdiameas. and apputanvzes, unto the said BANK. b fee simple. 1 d!:g:)- - LAM rc l TSS#(: 844 AND THfi SAID MORTGAGOR does hereby aoccaat with BANK that said MORTGAGOR is indefeasibly seized with the absolute sad fee simple title to said property. ant has (W power Jed bwful' authority to 341. =vey. transfer and mortgage the same: that it simll be lawful at any time hexea6a for the BANK to peaceably mW quietly corer upon hold. amid occupy said property. the aid property is free and discharged frorn all other and prior liens. anessawlts. )udgmem. taxa. aid eocturbraaea: that said MORTGAGOR does hereby warrant the tick to said land and will defend the sant against Al lawfid claims. PROVIDED ALWAYS, thtr if THE MORTGAGOR :ball pay utso THE BANK the satin of rrsrioey aggregating ONE MILLION FOUR HUNDRED THOUSAND. AND 140/100 ($1.40.000-M) DOLLARS. evidenced by the PROMISSORY NOTE I k , referred to. as well as any reiewab: modificationts and esaenniors thereof. iojaher will all sums s=ad hereby and shall pay all other sum provided to be paid by this Mortgage. and shall perform. comply with.amd abide,by all, the stipulations. . agreemcns. conditions and covenams of said PROMISSORY NOTE, of this Miinpgr, aid of all the ndaitd loan documents delivered to the BANK in rotation with the loop secured hereby (eollear dy the 'Loan Documents'). the estate hereby created shall nesse and tie null and void. AND THE MORTGAGOR does hereby furtber wvc.r= and agpw as follows: 1. MORTGAGOR shall pronWay pay on or before 10 days after the prior wrium aotiee of ,the thea Payment due date. the principal and an the Indebtedness evidenced by the PRObUSSORY.NOTE toad by this Mortgage. late charges if provided in the PROMISSORY NOTE and any eta spoors eft' to the BANK by reason of any Mmeat made in order to prosect, `tbe BANK'S oseresr ander the PROMISSORY NOTE. and this Mortpge. 2. To pay all and sigplar the tares. irmmce. ammmmts. levies. Rabilkies, obligatnoas. and encumbrancesr+e of every naauon said described property. ark mad every one ahmt dam and psyabisaccoeding, to law. befotr they betrorne dolimgtsem ssd if the same shall not be ptomrptly paid, the BANK a8as IS days written notice to MORTGAGOR a its option. and without obligedm to do so, may pay the acme svuhom waiving or affecting the option to foreciesa. or airy sighs heramdv and every pmymeat oto made Wan beer interest from the due thereof at the ataxms m default rue as provided in the PROMISSORY NOTE socm d hereby. Time mORTGAGOR &hall deliver to the BANK receipts evidencing the pay taat of. said taxa, assessments.. levies. Co.. within thirty (30) days following dee pmymel thereof a regmted tinder this Paragraph. Any sash asraounts pa id by the BANK ptaastnis to this paragraph shall be severed by this remortgage. 3. To keep the buildings now or bextafta on said lead and the factures sed personal prop sty thereie contained insured. wizh a cmapaM or conipmies rtasombly apps. by the BANK. against lots by Tae: windstorm. and such other eassalti s, for such period and for mot Ras thea such amoeait as theBAPGC =q - reasonably rirc. but is no event less thaw the principal supe of the PROMISSORY NATE. sad to apply promptly when due all premitutss for such imoraece. MORTGAGOR agrees to deliver raswal or gplaetme� policies of any namai: or rtphm ®art eatiCsatms of insurance to the BANK. at 1929 test (10) days prior $o the eapiraion or amwvasarydate of the eshaimg polities. The est os of iawrams 9rptead by ohm RANK ahaR. be the mtaimum mount for wbieis said insurance shall be whoest aid it shalt be mcz;aI upon the MORTGAGOR to maintain such additional', as may be neoessssy to meet and comply !illy T*h A co-insurance nxprc aems corrained in said policies m else and hitt MORTGAGOR is nix a w4msaws tbcrcursder. The policy or poikks shall he bdd by aid be prfable to said BANK, and if the Pray 9nosy Nae is in default. the BANK sisal! bare hist option so rsaiva aid apply raid pay mea m acco prof the indah—h os hereby secured. or permit the MORTGAGOR to receive or use it. -of any pat dared, for army paposs without thereby Waiving or impairing an wory. Ban of right attach mad by virtue of this 1Nort eL In ohm event the Promissory Nara h mot in defuult asf the MORTGAGOR eieets to teI " the hapsav®ma upon the mortgagrod property. the BANK shall =dw available the !armee proceeds to the f4W( AWR bs a manner «ssoombly aaaap92ble m the BANK and tie MORTGAGOR w that: the aliallft arse the bmissi e proomds dlsburwra s miry be moohrned by the BANK. The BANK may place and pay such' (69 ir>aaratoe psnocatls receivable by THE BANK by vis toe of this parapapb shall only bo the I 4, from the policies ie4ttired bads) or say' pan. dond wit4as waiving or affeeehtg the opafm to tioeedetap ar soy right hereunder. and catch usch pmyme:$ _ shall bear Meng see the mai®ma etsladt rate as peovi8ed is the PROMISSORY NOTE sacred bereby begi9aatg aftat 13 d:)rs prier y►riata aaitr to MORTGAGOR'to reirmbww the BANK for the payment mads for rho amrsoce. 4. To permit. comma. or suffer wase, impairnmut. abandonment. or deterioration of.said property, or any part thereof. and upon the failure of the MORTGAGOR to keep the buildings and/or lbe personl 2 ft 1759►. 645 property located on the mortgaged premise:, in the tame crnditinn as currently exists. normal wear and tear excepted, the BANK may demand by twestty (291 drys prior written nonce the irronedive mpoir of said property, or an increase in the anioutx of security. and the failure of the MORTGAGOR to rmgly with said fe:mnd of the BANK within twenty (20) days after receipting prior wn= robot shalt constine a default of this Moripp. and at the option of the BANK, it may immediately Torre the entice amount of pri=ipai and irterea hereby sewed. and the BANK, immediately and without notice, arty inuirute proceedings w foreclose Itis Mortgage and apply for the appointment of a receiver. as hereinafter provided. Notwidestading the foregoing. if the condition cannot be curd within said twenty t20) days. then MORTGAGOR Uinta begin e zrk to cure the defect within said twemy (20) days and urrsrnue diligently thereafter urail the defect is Bused. 5. To pcsfotm. comply with and abide by all the stipulacioas. agreements. conditions. and covenants set forth in the PROMISSORY NOTE secured hereby and this Manpgc within any applicable price period. 6. To pay all and singular the coax. tees. charges. and expenses of every kind. including the Cart of an bstrm of title to said lands found to he necessary or espdiertt in connection with any suit forthe kreclosmr of this Mortgage, and also including. wbe ba the BANK is oblipmed to pay same or not. roan bk atxonzy's fees ittwrne l or expeaded at any time by the BANK because of the failure of the MORTGAGOR to l , font. comply with. and abide by all or any of the covenim. conditions. and aiptdaeions; of said PROMISSORY NOTE. or this Morepp. in the foreclosure of this Morpge. aria colleoing the amount teetred bweby with or without legal proesdinp. or in enforcing the relent. eonditorn. and covenants of this latish or ags without legal proceadi. and to reimta tbut tie BANK for evay soneblepry neat made or iowned for any .nth puspcue wilb itmetesr frown date of every such payment at the tnutimirn default ria a provided in . the PROMISSORY NOTE seemed hurby: such payrnans and obllgatiOms. with imerm thaeaaas aforesaid. .ball be secured by the lien bctvrf. 7. To oomoy with all foderal. state. aid late laws. mks and re/ulatiors. subdivisionttettittiosts and the . municipal tomirrg nrdinareoes apptiabie to mortgaged property, mw in Cft= or in the fUm= sot to en= err permit to be er=c+d any' new buildings an the premises herein mortgaged or to add to or perm to be added tit. malts or permit to be made. my arucanral altaations to any of the existing imp. vvaseas Lboeoe which has a anterial adverse effect no therpt—ter. wirhau the wmien cozen of the BANK. and in the enmt of any violation or attempt to via)re these sipubdons. or any of then. this Mortgage and aY warm secured hereby shall immediately becoare due and payable at the option of the SAW. MORTGAGOR AND BANK further agree to the follmviug: S. If any of the stmt of money herein refereed to ma not promptly and fully paid within TEN 1101 days after the arae becomes draw and payable. or if nay of the ts.ccinditionsand, mre�rtt! tonsained in the PROMISSORY NOTE and this re rtu littly petfortuaL vkh and abided by within twenty (20) days after receipt of aniam noticed vmcasipliaoce. and if the condtiow caatot be cured within said 20 -day period. then MORTGAGOR must bgin writ to curs the defect within aaid 20 days and condom dillga* thertatta um d the defect a c n d dm riot same &ball be .00nsidansd a "—It of this Mortpge and dee PROMISSORY NOTE. aid the aggregate sum ser forth in the PROMISSORY NOTE theft ra rete l; tapraid, with tramest acenned to that time and unpaid. and sill risme. soanred hereby, shall become date and payable forthwith. or derofta. at aha option of the BATIK. as iylly and completely a if all the said sums of money were or*iaally stipulated so be paid an such dry. aaythbtg in the PROMISSORY NOTE ar is this h4orsgW to the contrary nonridmard* std dz m*m or theralta. at the optics of the BANIL without twtim or deanand. suit as law or in equity may be proseMed as if an monies seamed hereby bad matured prior to its institution. 9. in the event rho MORTGAGOR fails to pay my charges or obiipttors rW'dit'ed to be paid by 1 MORTGAGOR baratader. within the rem set forth fat sem payment. the BANK shall have die riot to pay such charge or obiipuiom without waivigt or a5saaft the Option of the BATIK o t:oaida die mmortpoe in default after ran (10) days prior wristea notice to HORTOAGOR to provide an oppertmtiry no pay bark such sum. Every rich pavnem so rade shall beg interest a tie nttartim m default rm s provided is the PROMISSORY NOTE secured hereby. and emy rod► peymeaa shall be dewaxed adddiomal sawia owed by the MORTGAGOR to BATIK. +ball be payable as demand of die BANK thetdom snd shahl he gamed by the tion of this Monor. to. In the event of a default is my of the Wm of this MonpSe and/or the fling of a C niplslnt m famdow this or any other mortgage encumbering the within described property. the SANK a kOR JCAGOR shall be entitled to apply at any tate upon wrlim amice, pending such foralosurc suit. to the Cam hsvitto Jurisdic m thereof for the appointment of a receiver of all and singular the mompgtad property. and of all the rens. imnmes. profits. issues and :crenae& d:erettf. iron whusc0estx souwz detived. and tMeupun it n . hereby expressly covenanted and agreed that the Court &lull fonbw-Ah appout! i reserver of said wo "B'd property all soil singufar. and of sorb most. nowties. profits. issues and, reseraies thereof, frrn» whatsoever sours desired. with the usual pourers and duties of receivers in like uses: and vxb appoirsauea shall tie nude by such Court erg a roatrer, of stria right to the BANK end the SIORTGAGOR. and wAhwtt reference to the adequacy or inadequacy of the value'of the property hereby moripSed, err w she solvency or the insolvency of rhe MORTGAGOR. and tha: such Teres. profits. incomes. issues. and revenue shalt be applied by such receiver to the psytners of the mortgage indebtedness. toss. and Charges. atrcadielt to the osier of such court. 11. Notvrichsundin6 the provisions of paragiap:h 10 hereof. all of the rents. deposits. revenues and profits . arising our of the operatutm of the mortMod property ars. by the texas bcroof. sssWW to the BANK as : further s unity for the psyttvent of the todebtedow se=,ed hersb}. and no otW bntnunent or downaerus need to be exe mated by the MORTGAGOR w effect such gssigamaait. Any subsequent assipaiiscoc of the rasa. dgmits. revenues. and profits of the nYxtpgad property. Of any 'pan thereof. shall at an rimes bet interior sail subordia m to the assipmtem gamed hereby ad to the rights of rhes MORTGAGE hemurhd r. This assigicti m sbatt eaaiow, in dux: =if the iadebndttest seared by this Mongape is gold in full. NOTWITHSTANDING the faegazzig, MORTGAGOR SWI bepeihauied to collect the rites as long a: these is no dedrsuk tundra the MOMISSORY MOTE and MORTGAGE r 12'L If all or soy part of tiro property or m ittteren tfserrin is sold. tsamfee:ed. atasnbered. or if diene is a edimp of owttcrsbip of thenxnpgsd premises or any prttpary a acumbend by this martsage. or if theme: is a mtrtsfer or cb=ge of ousnaW* of the properly witbouc BANK'S prior wm*cn toruses. BANK sassy. at BANK'S option, declare all tfte sues secured by this Mongape w be msnedisely due and payable. &%W stat! have waived sunt opcat to w--dame if, prior to the sok. transfer, eYtaasbranee. or chop of owne ship.,BAMK and the paras to wboir the property is to be sol& mmftemil. or transha d reads agmatiaent in writing that the credit of usch person. Is sa abic"NY so BANK ad that the interest payable an the sums swan d by this Mortgage still be at suck cyte tts BANK tbaA Niquest. .13 In the event the owwrilsip of the.mottgaped,ptettisa. or any part tirrrmf. W m r ,s vested in a pusses or amity other than the MORTGAGOR. the BANK my. without notice w the MORTGAGOR. dad wM tach ataaxnw or ttwcoesson is mwest with refem. to this MonpSt'sad tfse debt hereby sacsrcid. it: the Mems marrow n � kb the MORTGAGOR. vtthsut M tray way vakw* cwdisdttK" the ytORTGAGOftS lid�7sy hasmda or opun the debt hereby secured. Wale of cite pushes hereby tnongapad aid ac'Foefatsasafsts on the pan of the BA and and to esaahsion of the dire fix the payaw•t of ft debt bcreby —wed givesn by the BAMK. shall operas& to release. discharse. arocfih. change. or affect sten original IbWby of the MORTGAGOR berein. either in wMe cur in parr. 14. Time is of the essence and no waiva of any obiilpid r hchw der. or of the abflpsios Maased bwcby. shall it my Bute herrsttsr be bald to be a wawa of the airau bereof ar`eu chi: Nese sassed heresy, 15. If faredattre proceedings are i-ith-rd an MY mofrpp inferior to this Mizappe god areoa+bering the mortgaged property. of ff say foraclotate ptoeeeiing is instituted an any ties an the 1111M awed yeapaty of any kW. the BANK sassy at its optica ottniedtardy or tbaeiha &rJde this l►fotraape ad do W& ttadrsttas aacvted has*y. due and psychic. if there is any morspp.=Pena to tailon Mppe. thin fgfla:e to pay said moetpgo when due olid in aecard=w,wM its tams err faifurs w abode by sat teams. the BAMIE at fat aptfean- m y =N dWdy or dx7cz htr deehte this Morraspe and the indatredsess hereby stxurnd. dttc. &tail parable. Any s>odgkistion of say monpge t ; in to thus b6mpge or waives of arty ptiaapal or froom psyaras m artyDora or monppe supww m tftia MongW— =tuft* t* but asst limfted to the gtatt I g and scuptaaoe of faaure advatstas phstshraet LSueso. old! be eleat:d a hrecb etf Ilse teras sail aotwttarrs of this Mortgage , and the BANK bemrof etny at its opmm tfedate this Mongsap and'dw indebm thess amid hereby due and payable. 16. To the extent of the k dAndnsss of the MORTGAGOR to the BANK &SITH d' herdic air m cumd beraby. the BANK is Itts+sby Mu79SOC to the lies or liens and to rises rfpfss of the owners and holders tbcnmf of aacb and every neorsge• lim or o bw wwrnbrow eco the tend daaibcd bacu whidt is POEM atsdter suidlad. in whale a bis poem. tact of do pmoeesds of due km described brae*& or, shtssae I haft. wad the respa dve fisas of said nartgnim-Amt. or odt it ensemmbrianee. shall be anal dee same and00 of than Is bah:by'pmW wed god shall pas to mail be bald by the BANK ham as tt xu ty for the mdMO*vss 10 the BANK hemir dsscribW of 110*Y sawe& to the aatne unarms that it would have berm pratemed and could haw pored w and beat bald by fie BANK had a bot d* surd mpulady assipo. traassfenod. as over. ad delivered sotto aha BANK by se>pum iocauwAs Of atsipenesa. nawalesnndmg the fact shot the Lime ray be satisfied and rwwj led of record. it beteg the itteeisiem of the panics herexo that the same will be satisfmd 4 Ott 17548 n 847 and canceled of record by the holders thereof a nr about t:e time of the recording of ioais iWortgage 17. In order to accelerate the maturity of the indebtedness hereby sensed ba2use of for failure at the MORTGAGOR to pay any tax ancomm. liability. ohNsation. or mctmtbrassr upon said property as herein provided. it shall not be necezary nnr tequiske that the BANK shall fru pay the same. 18. The mailing of a Written notice of demand. addm&%d to the owner of reeard of the ncapSW prestibres. directed to the said owner at the last address awmalfy, fumisbed to the BANK. or directed to the said cra-ner at Lid trum8aged premises. and roiled by United Sones CeatSed Mail. Return Receipt Raquested. staff be sufficient notice and demand in any case arising under this insnuarsent and required by the provisions homer or by law. Notice to BANK if regdired heramda. shall be dcernrcd ply given she forwarded by Certified Mid. Return Rtrequ Reguestad. with suffi tent possaac atfised thereto and addressed to BANK at 780 N.W. 42nd Avemte. Miami. Florida. 19. if the validity or lien of this MoMap at the PROMLSSORY NOTE secured hen* be aro eructs by Iniputoo or otherwise. or if any action w preonedWS shall be caemenred in which the BA.NK is made a parry. the MORTGAGOR asses to pay to the BANK the icasarable cost of defending fie stone, inchrdietg a rssoeabie aaoehey's fee and attorneys' fees on appal 20. In the event dui MORTGAGOR shall: (1) cement to the appoi®eu of a tadm trust=. or liquidator of all or a subusmid part of MORTGAGOR'S assets. or Q) be adjud"ad at baaiabptcy or admit in writing its inability to pay its s:abrs as they become due. or (3) make a gerwal assigamm for ft beaef t. of =Whom. or (4) file a petitine or answer seeking txotgatuatim or aratgimm with cnalocri: or 10 rake advxmt*e of any insolvency law. or (S) fib an answer *Avtft the tnasesssl alksatiam d s pedriom filed against Llic 11401MAC,OR in nay hanks iptry. rcorgutindm.or insof—cy pocaediagL at (b) action &half be taken by the MORTGAGOR for the purpose of effecting any of the fan aing.'at (f) nay otter; judW esu. or tteato :bail bt coev red upon an application of a creditor of MORTGAGOR by a cast of compaesx junoAksi= appnovmg a paWen seelcins apposnanent of a receiver or nustae of all or a stha vottal part of the MORTGAOOR'S atlas sad such order. judgment. or deetne attar" coauinne umtsyed sod a tffm for nary period of ehkry (M) eanserutive days. tits BANG my declare the FROSUSSORY NOTE haadry, smired forthwith tine trod payable. whereupon the principal Of and the -ales&& w=w d an the PROWSOKY NME and all other sums boeby seamed shag bc=m fordmitb due and paysbie ss of dI of the sail arm of manr_y went: originally stipulated to be paid on such day: and thereupon die BANK wibouc mance cr deaard may prosecute a sue u law andtor in equity a if all moria secured hereby had traamed prior sob institution. 21. The BANK may at any time. without notice to any person, arm to the MORTGAGORaoy modifiasiw of airy kind or natty& wrintsoeva. relesaa soy Pawn IbWe for ps"M ofsay indebeedoea seemed hereby. or allow any dtaige or thsttges. sttbstittttiat of ambstitutfom of say of mfr. propemry daaer�ed W this Maeig ger or soy other conannaI which my be fold by the BANK, wkbms in any mmm affecting tine hall ty of the MORTGAGOR. of any cadorurs. and/tr guarantors of the indebraduess hereby n=ed army other petaon for the psyrow of said indebtedness. t pdw wide iraere> t and any other stmt which may fie dye and payable w dna SAM. and also wxhow in nary mantas afiaiang or impale" the lien of this I I tpgt upon the remainder of the property and edha eoilmaal which is not cimamped at subsdurA :sad its also andustood . and agreed dot me BANK may err say tim& without aoeiss m any person. swept MORTGAGOR release stay portion of the property ducrdad in this Mortsap ar nay alba collateral. of eny pMd= of nay other coancral whsds may be bend a security for tht: payaeemrt a( the Indebeedmea hereby m a md. arthat witb or without any eonsideruka for am* r a' , or rdams. without io coy manner a!&cLg the liability of the MORTGAGOR. the emdorsm. and/or gmramuora. and sit other psraom oho are or"be liable for the psymaeer of said indehoedsres. ad %*bow afBettias. dsanrbets or rmI , *no in any rasmar wbspcvar tux validity and priwsy of the 1)eo of des Mortl" of the f o amens of the indebeedaeu nmdains mpdd. tolther With ail inoerest and win mcis .Molt shO become psyabk. upos the cams nmaihder of the mortsased pnoprrty which is nare}eased. and without In any nuaoer affeaiil Or itr>paiemg to any tatremis whasaever say and alt ower edlaRral am -ay whits may be odd by the BANL It is diainGty mderstoe d and agreed by the MORTGAGOR and dao BANK da any mime or releaser may be made by the BANK without the aomeR or approval of any add person Or persons wbomaoeva. 22. Any agrrearmmt hifnRer node by MORTGAGOR and BANK puna so tis HagW shelf be twpcs)er to do Agin of tie hollers of or inaarva:>amg Liam err mmabraece. 23. In the event the premises bereby matsssed. sr any pan thamf. shaft be cadmmd and, taken ®da the power of emane s domain. the BANK shall have the n& to dMIEW that AD dawgts awarded for rho ukf»ft of or damifes to said peremiat s &baht be paid to the BANK. Its imccason or arsgrs. cep to the mmotmt that unpaid on this Mortgage, and may be applied spins, the payment err paymer" last payable thereon. Ic 24. Tbo MORTGAGOR will keep adequate records and books of axotaa in arrordamce with sctcrauy adsepted annotating prindpies asad will permit the BAN:L, by as agdmts, --arm Mad anon eys. to urtsi WW nspoa the pr vu= and eSamtne the records and boobs of aeoouat of MORTGAGOR and to discuss the affairs,ftnmucrs and —'.,unu with MORTGAGOR at smh reasombie times as may be requested in writing by the BANK 23. The MORTGAGOR will. at the east of the•MORTGAGOR. and writhes: expo w to the BANK. do. eseeut . aclui Hedge, and deliver all and every such huther arcs. deeds.. cartveyaeca. asorrsageS.. assignments. notices of assign amen, ramie: . and asaaiancas a the BANK Shat! frow.it= to time rognire.. for the beaer assuring. uonvcyiv,& assigning, transferring sed andhiniog emto the Rkkx'ibe Peepetty and rishm hereby cam -Eyed or assigned or imaeded now or ha nor so to be. or which the MORTGA(M sffiy be or :easy hereafter become bouad to convey or assists w on BARL or for cuyn6 eta the laranoon or f"HnaUng dx performance of the terms of this Mortgage and/or any other Joandoaar�s. or for Albs. resistering. or recording this Mortgage and/or any other Item docn ne L and. on demand. will cane gad deliver. and hereby authorizes :tie BANK t* d zero in the awn: of the MORTGAGOR m tfiE ems it nay lx%fuliy do so witb prior nonce to MORTGAGOR. one or mora fimacIn& wieme:Qs. riitad mortp�s or aRnparable sd>vtiry irts;nttserua: to e+edesca :gore etieai.dy the lien hereof upon the :noted at persoeal PfePaw- 26. da) The MORTGAGOR fo;dmith upon the cocavion and delivery of thb Morsgase and dttseafbts from Um to time, will cause this Mortpge, and any semrity immmiar aaeetog a lime or evidencing the lien hemof upon thr ural and/or personal propory and each imatsiesu of hasher Sas'. -r P to be !Bed, reai"erod or recorded is s:ach aaaoua and in such places as any be required by say present or fbmre lir in onder.a publish notice of and to fully prow the lies and imeresa of tit BANK in the wortsaged pmpeny. (b) The MORTGAGOR wig Pay all Ribs. tegstrad= or recording terns. and all reasonable expenses incident it, the prepumm eaeeatiaL and acimowled;iu m of this dQottgage. uy maatgage RWcmemal'hemeo. any security mattarumt wltb respect to tfre des, and any,iaarnamt of todw assurance, and all federal. stn::. comity a micipal stmt taxer ad od w t=xea. titans. intpow, tsswDtnm. AW charges WkWig on of of in co>nection with thr cxccW= and delivery of the PRO SSORY NOTE dds Mortgage. any mortgage suppletawtel heme. my seeafsy 1>ameaeet % th respect so the tdatteis. or gay instnarmat of bather assurance. 27. The MORTGAGOR will pay. from tfnr to tone when the same shall become do& all ddains and demands of meebanics. muaalmm. Iaborers. and abdxs which, if =paid. might cerci: in. of pawn the d ration of. a lien an the treonsaged pmpeny. whahq pasassodnn or sdbandtima to this Nogege, or nor pant ' thcmf. or on the te;veaoes. tomb, issue. buoroe Sed profits analog thttdsaoo, and in =moral will do or caws to be dam everything eetzaany so that the Lm of this Monop stall be !City pmerved. set the east o! the MORTGAGOR. wbtiroat expe>ise to the BANK. i The ctaias of c chane. anetrfahim aed/or laborm which nay give rise, n ' lamsap ch be tdeased, disddwged or bonded by MORTOAGM with a mer or tamely bond in the tanow m*dmd by law for the boetdutj of inechanks' gem. witbia thirty (30) days of the teoordfag of the claim of Jim 28. The MORTGAGOR shall. within est UO) dap after written drstaod by the BANK, swans fn s och foto as Shall be ntasaasbly mqum d by the BANK. an dxnlllone and • waiver of ddenaes dttfy acimowlodgrd. scubas forth die atmars of prtndpal and fttt m «opo d under the PROMISSORY NOTE and the Sones! Status of this Monger - 29. This Montage AWJ cottatmm s Monty the UnNom Coni aercid Code s it peeaeedy assts gad nay hereafter exist in the State of Florida An b that owmd by the MORTGAGOR. tht MORTGAGOR harby sites and glans umtin BANK a 'As baerat In and to the fiaolotnt. flotttacs. sesatsial @*LVwv%• may. Deanne. P, I and dxAsrt . rfgbts nammary aed motmdly nand to tun, operatim of the snetgg d pa@im. , A/ORMAGOR ftd= agree to CZ6C= and dlivor to dts SAM Sauham%xsly anti tis exconlm and dftdtwsy of dib Massago% or at easy aha time at aha ssttrest of SAJ% gay and all Uolfcm Cas: umW Code Stsamem na on" te*dmd by the BANK to a ffew the punposas.atad latent of this paragagh. 30. If this Mospge and the PROMMMY NOTE: aeonoed hmby be tnodlfiad. ea�dnd. reaewed. or in , Soy odm mamw altered at the rugoat of MORTGAGOR or any otbw Patty obliVOW berwaider or under the MOIel &iMY NOTE mooed hoeby or upon agranew wilt the BANK. MORTGAGOR shall pry to` the BANK any and all newoneble oasts of such mbd rkedoe. coension or rmewtl. iWa ft but not limited to tick review. Utriform CoamfreW code review. additional cast of recording. and such. rosoaabie 8' 6 fc= as nay be Lmurred by the BANK for such avxiMcaum. extension. or renews. 31. In the event any one or more of the provisions Contained in this MORTGAGE or in the PROMISSORY NOTE or in arry other loan docLanra shah for any reason be Tadd to be inaMiicahle. invalid, illegal or unenforesable in any respect, such itapplicabilirl. invalidity. Wegality. or uaralor eabiliry shall. at rhe option of die BANK. not affect any otber provision of this Mortpge. baa this Mortgage shall be construed as if such inaWliable. invalid. illegal. or unenforceable provision had never been contained herein or therm. 32 All of the grants. covenants. torus. procisioaa. and conditions bacis slap rut with the land and shall apply to. bind and mure to tae benefit of. the Succasors and assigns of the MORTGAGOR and the vxzcswn and assigns of the BANK. 33. This Mortgage or any of the terms bemtnder canna be modified orally 34. This Mortgage shah be vverned by the Inn of the State of Florida. 35. It is the imeru bereof to secure paymeat of the Note and obligation smrred bereby whether Site els ire amu= shall have been advanced to the MORTGAGOR on the date bcmof. or at a Ista date. 36. If at any time the State of Florida shall determine that the doeoataaary stataps attired to the Noce or herein or the tarts paid on Nis Mortgage are iasufiidmt and that addidimai stamps or lases sbo.Wd tbe:cdwr be affixed or paid. the MORTGAGOR shag pry forte same. together w hili m areSi cr, my poWdeg impoiitd in connection wish sucb dram utatioo. and the am= of money needed to pry for such uw ps of tares and penalties 511111, ue1r7 such staaips are pttrchuad and affixed and sat taxa and penalties paid. be a peatiem of the indebtedness see a o by this Mon" and bear :oma from the date of w ch deacmimroa a the ttaaimemt default roc as provided in the PROMISSORY NOTE secured iinx6y. 37. Any payneent etrade in accordance with the terata of dw Mottpp by any penin at any toms liable for the payment of the whole or any part of the aim now or hereafter second by this Martpp, or by any subsequent owner of the pruniscs. or by any otba prrson •more interest In the premises miglet be pnjudieed in the eves of a fttlure to make sirh payment, or by soy xocl boldcr. oftxer. or director of a corporation which at any time may be liable foe suds payment or may own or bava rAeb an tareten in the premises. shall be decme& as bemcen rhe SANK and a8 pawns %thio at any time may be liable as aforesaid. or may own the premises. to have been rade on behalf of all sorb persons. 38. Acceptance: by the BANK of any pay== rbxh is ins than fidl payersa of all nocunts dire and pttyabic a she time of sucb psymax. even if made by ons adrer than the ob*w. shall not c ooaiaat a taiaivtr of tie MORTGAGEE'S d& to eserci a its option to dedase the whole of da:,prinei�pal slam thea reratiaiog unpaid, tollabu with all accused mte7eet tieteaet, faanediateip doe nerd ps*abio withtrot nonce, or arty ittbrr fights oP The RAMC can rpt as to the cuest othewise provided by law. 39. Thr eights of the BANK arising beseaeder ur allowed or petmitred to !be SANK by las, shad be sqm=. disu= and esu arlaive. and ds solation of one remedy shsil not: pcednde the sdosim of [mother or oche rttnsedies until the BANK sMa hue roeovared all sums SIM it snraiher whit the apptoptisee iotetrst therem and all rasorrable cm of colli cast s. including seatarabk attorney's fees and appeum atsorney's foes. 40. Wbavvrt sized in this Monpipe. amiss she contest a3saiy kOhOoes'a Contrary bUM or ontns odtmrwip ap=&Wly provided burcinthe sand 'MORTGAGOW dali tnen -Mortgagor and/or nay aftepm owner or owners of tie penins'; the word 'BANK' dao mean 'OCEAN BANK or nay s olmalo t holdtx or bokkm of this Mtloetpge% tin word °pinna' shall man 'an individual. eorpoution, paras n* or unincorporated aae<oeiasion. joint aoelt corporation and joint venues'. and prountts of any podw chap Inch de the odeor gra I . and dtf,e tits sing , or the plant shalt iocluds She atfanr, if tie MORTGAGOR consists of more than ease person. tint obliVions ass ll"bia MORTGAGOR consists of mora than one person. the obligations and llabifltis of a nit such person heraande't shall bs joim and several. 41. Ii at any time my of the buntings or the ispavvaneas or the equipment nos at I kxu d on or in tee pray ises be uteproccued or aeparded. or the Isss be -an -a to tettnsiet vet — or dun -ad Orr more than rat dugs the BANK mry. at its option: employ watchmen for ria premises and sxpead any aacnin damnd by is reaunabiy nt>ccasry to prosect the Iises and do building and 6rupevvaaeetes thereon and the psrsorad propeM tannin tram sane. vandalism and odea baaaeds. depredation or injury. and ale mom of any rrtsossI ie monies expended for surb porpoaas with imam 0 the maxionan default bus after 13 days prior wriaea nothos to reimburse ate RAMC for the moonable a routs paid as provided in the PROMISSORY i OFr 1 T548>r 8'50 • NOTE. and payment of sums so expended shall he due and payahk by MORTGAGOR to the BANK on atmtand and be added to rhe indebtedness and be secured by this Mlongade. 42 MORTGAGOR repreber". warrants. covenants and agrees to perform all of the obligations to be perfo.•med by MORTGAGOR under this Mortawge. tbe.PROMISSORY NOTE m=W hereby. and any cher intmaaart evidenmog arrlror securing the indetwalms secured hereby and in accordance ovule the terms conaiined herein. 43. TAX AND INSURANCE ESCROW: If the loan. real elate tues sad irtsurame are in ddiR& THE, BANK may require MORTGAGOR w pay to THE BANK on the pm)= as due dare of each payee - as provided in THE NOTE. any usemnem or charges imposed upon The Morips ri Property or say Put thmof by airy pary- whisker public or private (hertam}ter referred to as 'Intpoduml together with and in addin-ja to such paymeats, a paymmt repremw v$ the: amount of the lawtuom seed u' mwx ere prcmwus ' for such iimurance as is required by THE BANK, tea due on the WimTgaaed Plopeny to an amotn>r atfllcimc �. as estimated by THE BANK- to wts: mdwc dee Su= mquaad to pry reach 1114"Wom and m>aoaooe, as appUcabk. thirty 130) days prior to the dee data theresof. _ Amomm beld hereunder Shall not be. nor bedamed to be. mm funds. but cosy be oamettiftled with the =meal fimds of THE SAW— =d ao tomes abe3) be payable with tapect arm. Upoa demand of THE BANK. MORTGAGOR mall deliver to THE w thia tea (10) days atter each deaan0. stcb adduiamd angry as a aasssary 10 MA up any de8cimcim in am wn rawnury to enrb(e THE BANK to pay stub httposh am and htaatsstce peat i ms who chit.' in ate of as evert of default. THE BANK may apply any amount uttfer this settiam teatautmog to MORTGAGOR'S credit to the radvaion of THE NOTE. at tact timer and in ouch msme m THE BANK shag determine.' 44. ENVIRONMENTAL CDNOi1TON 'OF" PREMISES: Emkotmteatal ConStim of Property. MORTGAGOR hemeby 16w acus sad rep v=ctz to THE BANK after tbomsh irtveatipum this: (a) the Pramim at sow and at all titles taafter will contieme w be in bdl cottiplimm with all Federal. State sad local erviroommral Iatfa sad rtatdatim. irdWing bet not lhmmtd to. tee c;ougsrelteasive Eeviratmttmat Rapoeete. Compta>:atiom"sad Liabit6y An of 1980 j (C.ERCLA). Public Law No. 96-510:94 Sts. V67. sand the Superbmd Awcodmeata tai Reautliodviiott Aa of 1956 (SARA). Poblie Law No. 94+199. 100 Stat. 1613: and (b) (1) as of cht due her these we.,W its hwwIftW afro imesigitliaa, 00 hmmdota materials. stitwireees.. tvaate or orber envimamenially regulated albamm (In dudiog aitbm ` Ibrdiag eras. any mm=zla c mnauw% asticum) located m. is or endo: the Premises or used in tunrec "ion dlerswWL or ` i (ii) MORTGAGOR has my 6nctosed to THE BANK ret wtims the esateace. � wad namry of say such 1- , Its amlenal. tub5m=. wase or otter eorhuome>�l�. . repbL d. subaa>rs, currmdy prom or abicb MORTGAGOR is legally modwrisad add etapowemad to mxmmjl on. in or under the Premises or use'in enmteadm L%mewidi. MORTGAGOR hex obamed sad will ==Hera 86 Iieaasm i' "I and apptovsk ragtsead wits, mg= tbmw. and is and wM ramin is brit eompitaeee wide aB of the scenes. ccn&iam. sed re *mvn ms of such lintaaas. pem>its and apprvvala MOAT GAGOR brtthw wxmm sad represents that h wM pnampdy axiy, THE BANK of any dmp a ms cmtvirotmaemid. medium of tee Maes or in the hence or escort of loty basafb w tmaariab. mbsan= or wasrss maiminml on. in or under the Pnemism or,tsad hs oormmkIm WerewW4 and wM traaaait to THE BANK copies a( sty caw=. onkm mace+ at aha maagsl gvveaTmcrsai or odw oanwakaim nceived rhh respect to cry other hamadma ommiak. submAm. wam..+r ether eamtomiamay mphyad wb7aoee of cM the Promim MORTGAGOR hereby indes>mifes sad bol& harrales: THE BAM from suit against say Sod aB dam tan. pcnakka. fires- clSias. suis. ttabWtia, cam Jitlpoem and acPernes (iodudtaK zomwys'. oottsoltauut'ti or eagect's fns) of :'ray kind sad ttamte mc=T d. auf/ettxd by or asserted apim THE B"X Is a dmf or itadtiess :esti& of: W any warnmy our rep emamdoo matte by MORTGAGOR in thk paraStapt bm% w beoitimil a false or wow in mp eas=e tapwor, nil Sly rtrgtaraws under etre Irv:, replation or ordina=: ICL7I- Wft of fed".. re&adinE the remove! os elimandoo of cry b arirdws trnterials. substances. r-aareor other. i enviruonreml)y mcpdated stif>swoGes. i mq,�!!l2121s� 888278606 •J ni r. � �TZU�..UlU R(C. K11R8Alfi'Y DEED TBIR IMWrf= is made this 18th day of May, 1988 by and' between JAZ ■. IAYi'SPBI®, joined by his wife BETS P. LOTSPEICH and EDWARD K. FEE, joined by his wife RELE1f. ANNS F=, (hereinafter GRA1fTORS ) and TIM CITY OF IIIAKI, a municipal corporation (hersinatter GUNTEE) , of Post Office Box 330708, Co=onut Grove Station, Miasi, Florida 33233-0708. KITiYESBE'TS That said GRANTORS, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars and other good and valuable consideration, the .receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, hereby grant, bargain., sell' and convey to said GRANrEE, its successors and assigns, all of their right, title and interest in and to a certain parcel of real property, situate in Dade County, Florida, to wit: Those portions of LOT 24, BIACR 71 SOUTH, CITY o8 MIAMI, according to the Plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book B at Page 41 of the . Public Records of Dade County, Florida, sore particularly described as follows: The ZhST five (S) feet of said I= 24 and the external area of a circular curve concave to the NOR1M28T having a radius of twenty-five (23) loot and tangents which are twenty-five (25) feet IICr= of and parallel vita the centerline of ScutAvest 10th Street and thirty (30) test WEST of and parallel with the canterline of South Miami Avanus. This Deed is executed subject to all restrictions, oasenents and limitations of record and taxes for the year 1988. GR k3=RB do hereby warrant title to said property and will defend the ease against the lawful -claims of all persons whomsoever. Being a portion of the property conveyed to Jay W. Lotspoich and Edward H. Fee by Dead filed for record April 27, 1988 in Official Records Book 13659 at Page 848 of the Public Records of Dade county, Florida . WITMESS the GRANTORS' execution of this Warranty Dead the day and year first written above at Miami, Dade County, Florida. , Ci_1 WITNESS PRINT NAM: CSP•: S_+ C-1 &14rFL. z DRE88 WWI 'MESS i�(Ac(c k&W PRINT NAME: 8po Lera+c A,, rYt+� •�,: PRINT ADDRESS: W. I,OTSPEICH D c DOCL_ M600 ass Ci/ 4Y toys►e:CN t CRON10 A%W%MV:?. 1j1NO V707�itl� MOM#:0- MW W'WVW1MX -WA SEC I rm n 651 MORTGAGOR'S obligations herwrider shall am be limited to any extent by the term of THE NOTE. and. as to tory an or occu rce= pciar w paywm is full and satisfaction of said NOTE which rives rix to IW Why hrleunder. shall continue. survive " remain in full force and effect octwithstaodins foreclosure of this Moetpe. whew THE BANK is the pureh:set a the forccloswre sale. or delivery of s deed in lieu of fmcclosure to THE HANK. 45. THI: BANK AND THE MORTGAGOR S %XWCALLY AGM THAT MY WAIVE ALL RIGH, TO RLrLY OM 08 ENFORCE ANY ORAL. STATM MS MADE PRIOR TO Olt SUBSEQUFM TO THE SIGNING OF THIS DOCLM M. 46. THE BANK AND THE MORTGAGOR HWW KNOWMLY. VOLIIM'ARMY AND IIanur.ENTLY WAIVE TTS RIGt;I' EmwwANY IwAY HAVE TO A TsuL BY JURY wns 'F. . . RF9T TO ANY L39TGATION BASirD HEMOK OR ARIMG OUT OF, UNDER, Olt IN COPtN>Z noN WITS Tam DOCUAIII T, AIi1D/Oit ANY AG i T COMMdPidATZD TO BE EMI M IN COv WUNCnON HZWWrt73, ANIMM. ANY COtT>4,SB OF CONDI= COMM OF DEALING. STATENO IM MUCT M MOL Olt W1t17 MQ- E.W1 J& ACCOUNTS, COMRACTS. DISCLSOOM AM MR AGREDAERTS OF ANY AMM,, ANWR AMONS Off' F1T wmANY PARDTY MAm ampovy, awn, oR Alan TIIE E3ZCCTMN OF TIDS DOCLRWMW. TMS WATM ATPLM IN TM EViiTiT ANY OT= PA>tTtF$ IIVSYi'IZJTE. . MIN. OR DEFEW ANY LMGAMON.THIS PBOVMON IS A MATERIAL MUCMaW MR NK THE BAMIENDIM CMW TO fiWW 4GOR. IT M ==MY AGREED THAT NO PARTY Oft f mff HAS anaz9vaW THAT TM WMIV= VVIMA, NM IM MOORCIM 47. VEMM ANO 3URIfDfCl (W SHALL M IN RADE COUMT, FLORMA. FOR ANY AFFwmAT,n OR DiFFOam. LiGAL P m. GS v4' cowmcnoN WTI$ 'Tms DOCUM» Aimwoix ANY www DOCi1l10r i S omm BY TM MORTGAGOR DY FAVOR OF THE BANIL IN YVT MESS WHMEOF. the MORMAGOR has. on the dny ad rear fust above written. tamed tbesc preteas. Sipwd. sealed and delivered is the pteeacs of: STATE OF FLORIDA FITTIPALDI EXECUTIVE C'ENTPR. INC. a Florida oospetI I 450 South Miami Avmw Miami. Ft 33130 BY• BMSON FVrIPALDI. Praideat st: COUNTY OF DADE } THE ponWA M INSTRUMENT was at tows deddd before me dab _-* dry of February. 1997. by EMERSON FITiIPALDt. a Ptttaideat of FTrTIPALDt EXECUTIVE CENTER, INC.. a Fior" corporaion. oo bebdf of the omporadm lad aadar duo axporass =dwn ay. Ho ptod=od his Florida Drivers Lia ser a idettifietdoe►. Public. Sete of Florid& •.ct,.�,:.. �.<....,.�soa• Priz Name: N®A VALDES "AMY RUM eta<PWv+ewreatm v Mg"VAWLb 9 �` ''BAF aprsoatoa• txtleeona � so.ms �arsso ae,d�distlVm4ati rMg ��plla10tt7. 3 of r 13728&179 DSD LO'Ps>ri2CE AND FM TQ CITY OF XXAXI NXT ld, 1980 PILO! =Q P.. p WITNESS BETH P. i.OTSPE CH PRINT N nit Care -Sr ;rl- PPANT S: r WITNESS �ddS�,,�w 1.c�3p¢ett, PRINT NAME: sm u"jL Ave., PRINT ADDRESS: WITNESS -- PRINT NAM: 8,Ja ID.LAR25 AA9,r,t L rf s�TOA/ PRINT ADDRESS: — WITNESS PRINT HAMS Gla * 7)a) em PRINT ADDRESS: I WITNESS llbjt Al iOR/VL� .G PRINT MAID; t G,got Yrxw- ?a PRINT ADDRESS: - L., , A) WITNESS CheiST/AIF _2>.7R f2QPCVAP PRINT NAME: jj2po0 A*,*wsPvo,7,ft, Lie cwPOM% PRINT ADDVZS81 WPO�V-M Ii ` ANNE FEE L04S►[:C M i C R ON r0 arentw a ro. 11P++o+�v 70* S�wr Manz rioem 3?L9r wsv� L1061 �n q' +� }� 13728113WO. wARJUMrY nasD �»�C AM P=E_ To CI'i'7f OF NX&?a XX'Y lt, 1988 PAGE 'ffitE8 STATE OF FLORIDA) COUNTY OF DADS. ) THEN PERSONALLY APP>:hM bEFORL ME, &R Officer duly authorised'. to administer oaths and receive acknowledgements _within the Stats 'of Florida JAY W. LjOTSPEICB and HE 11 P. LOTSPZICR,- well known to rle, who did execute the foregoinq Warranty Deed and did acknowledge said execution as their free act and deed before x*. WITNESS XY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL this 18th day of Kay, 19.88 at Dade County, Florida. jo NOx'ARY TUBLIC,.Q3' B gFMRIDA AT LAR-. S `. elf, My Commission Facioir®s a `''•' O M fNdwr P late of f.o„di ' ` ' •. My Consasion ExOtes 4J as. 1919 . ;y .�Gsi`i � STATE OF FLORIDA) COUNTY OF DADS ) THEN PERSONALLY APPEARED BEFORE ME, an officer duly authorized,, to administer oaths and receive acknovledgements within the State of ` Florida NDNUW B. PEE and H MWA Ann 7ZX, well known to me, who did execute the foregoing Warranty Dead and did acknowledge said execution as their free act and deed '>`afore se. WITNESS NY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL thiel '18th day of 4[-*ii )�%998 at Dade County, Florida. .r NaW %bk• . SCtte e! Fat da _ AAV Co-L uon Eswc3 %w •••7 NOTA PUDLIC, ST Y• O �..., . ..: FLORIDA AT LARGL%•• my Coamission Expires,0;l.••`' APPROVED AS TO FOAX AND APPROVED' AS_-XO_RXSCRIPTION: CO CTNESS: CYT A DZRE DLIC WORKS This InatrsTslant Acceoted Ther Fern ui t;,.r. ::wt.: Pursuant to Resolution No.. Prepared Bys Passed and Adopted Department of Lav city of Miami, Florida. . .ir-elTo v G�titi.� :cc6:v► non, ' , • a eqT cewn, noe.x olcae .r.n�e JUCHARD P. SRfff = at" cacull CMT Afi� p{ Ap LOTSpl1CM b CROI410 A+eornavlor ?JQ�ori+aol+�0af�oe1 oavnl®��Ji4 t�O�t�01375.00A G V •d 031 -88R228606 �J iii. 1 J1.ZUM+30 U =X13 Zlf ZWZUAE is made this 18th day of May, 1988 by and between JAY V. IDTSPEICd, joined by his wife sm D. LOTBPEICH and EtUApp H. YU, joined by his wife REXX AN= 1=, (hereinafter GRANTORS) and TIE CITY or WI:Axz, a municipal corporation (hersinatter GRANTEE), of post Office Box 330708, Coconut Grove Station, Nia.ai, Florida 33233-0708. WITNESSETS That said GRANTORS, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt or which is hereby acknowledged, hereby grant, bargain., sell and convey to said GRANTEE, its successors and assigns, all of their right, title and interest in and to a certain parcel of real property, situate in Dade County, Florida, to twit: TDoce portions of LOT 24, BUXM 71 SOUTH, CITY o! MIAMI, acoarding to the Plat thele r ss recorded in Plat Book S at Page 41 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, sore particularly described as follows: The EAST five (5) feat of said IDT 24 and the external area of a circular curve concave to the NORTWZST having a radius of twenty-five (25) rest and tangents which are twonty-five (25) toot W CW= of and parallel with the centerline of Southwest 10t.b Street and thirty (30) feet WEST of and parallel vitt the canterline of South Kiaai Avenue. This Deed is executed subject to all restrictions, oaseaents and limitations of record and taxes for the year 1988. GRANTORS do hereby warrant title to said property and will defend the rano against the lawful claiss of all persons whomsoever. Being a portion of the property conveyed to Jay W. Lotspoich and Edward H. Fee by Dead riled for record April 27, 1988 in Official Records Book 13659 at Page 848 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. KZTNESS the GRANTORS' execution of this Warranty Dead the day and year first written above at Miami, Dade County, Florida. WiITN28S PRINT N : W. LOTSPEICH �'�il CwPii St C...1 [- 646 FL X/E-- P �"Dam� ► S ^mom,, ..t5 --MESS ,: se , 5.�a i hw Umts �pC cd PRINT NAME: Cyss n ego Up --g Am , PRIXT ADDRESS: c% Y' loTsrtt.�t t CRON90 AppnW"I'a 13� u70nS�ee+ Mv.a�ao,3XV r+earovwl7S3?S•own 188 • �161- 13728113M 10AN A, " Z= X*=PEZCa AND ZEE_ To 3%T Is, 1988 E STATE OF FLORIDA) COUNTY OF DADE ) THEN PERSONALLY APPEARED BEFORE NE, an officer duly authorised to administer oaths arid receive acknowledgements within the State of Florida JAY W. XDTSPZI® and BETH P. IATSPEICB, well known to no who did execute the foregoinq Warranty Dead and did acknowledge said execution as their free act and deed before ne. WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL this 18th day of ?lay, 1988 at Dade County, Florida. .. NO ARY PUBLIC, - ATS Oy. RIDA AT LARft ; : 0/E my Commission Expires: �� OP) - Ndaq PAA Slate of (.w,da `.f '' • •• V My C onnwwao Ea0tes tpJ 28. 1919 off .,`+'` ```,• STATS OF FLORIDA) COUNTY OF DADE ) THEN PERSONALLY APPEARED BEFORE ME, an officer duly authorized to administer oaths and receive acknowledgements within.. the State of Florida RONLRD:S. nZ and BILBN AMM FIX, wall knows: to so, who did execute the foregoing Warranty Deed and did acknowledge said execution as their free act and deed rafors se. WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL this 18th day of'�lnj j-(;988 at Dade County, Florida. Navy %bk..5uW of her is - NOTARY PUBLIC, SW&IOPK(0uatroo Edo a r. FLORIDA AT RGE by.,, .»... - 1 •j••b;;.0.1.1 Commission Expires: •;•• `��•'• APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CO CTNES3: / C'1Tj Amw This Instrument Accepted Pursuant to Resolution No. Passed and Adopted APPROVED AS_-Q—PLS CCRIPTION: DIRE SLIC.WORKS The Form OZ tnia Prepared By: Department of Law City of Miami, Florida aWf ca"". floe*. .1600 WMga RICHARD D. axLw= at" CYtull COOK: a LOT S Pt! 1C M Z C R O N 1 O Atsd�e�a a for 1Jo Mrrrot' 7'Oa S+1�et MeR. 1t7'= SAY kq8" W W LVN 3n-02)? 0 108 G IEC macer s'hanoerc erupt as approved a senna by ASSIUMEE and shall not be shred. modifMd. wtmeadet strtninased removed. or way wm or ca+dnirm thnaof be waived witbout the prior approv9 0( ASSIGNEE. 3. Thar brae we so defaWn row esuttag tinder any of the Lease. If way, ad there tatsts so or d Isim; Whish. with the yirg of nosier or LW= of time or both. would condom a deumh uMm say of de Le>ne= wad that ASSIGNOR will fulfill of pertorm cub and cmy aaaWsbo wed tnseUM of est d the Lgua, by Lasorw be Waded or performed. and Sive prompt ootirs to ASSIGNEE d aar coda of default by ASSIGNOR tarda toy of ie Loves reoz:i.d by ASSIGNOR toter with a mmplpe copy of aey' s&* eatloe.. ASSIGNOR shall. a the tole cost wad , mems of ASSIGNOR. to(==. short of satiation Of any IAUL the peefettmtes or obsavatce of ae5 wad cvM co.== raid o,A ttmOf all wch Leases by the lesstets) w be performed or obtened. S. Tisa ASSIGNOR hat int mlietaed ad that W m1lm. aaccept piD of. ren coda wy of ie Leases more than om momh m a sow. EXCEPT sorb wdvwtrrs aoUealaas trkirh arc is neo ofdiofty canis o! brawn. S. ThatASHGPfORsttallera.eraAouttht:pe4arwritaacoa�ofAS5It3l:�.ema>aottoytutmeiQesapen' _ AU or way pan of the PREbI= and shall eseaae wad ddNtiir a the mgam o(ASU(.WEE 211.99h firetba aisramid Md aaiytmems as ASSIGNEE sbA 6om time to runt MQ M-: or dem tremtary. 6_ The panics funha syee a Woss A. This Assi menu is swum and is dredve mrmdiady. Notwiiiisotd>ttle I g. aril ssdicd by de ASSiGTW.. in awmi; tha a ddadt ba ooearrrd tarda the arms and eacadbio- of Iter MUM a MlXrGAGE or wary odea opummm away twS adtLtioal sa nnvity far the HOUS. ASSIGNOR may tecam.tallm. adm)" ttis rasa. ascot and ptofm rectum fivm tke PREHISES. B. In the~ of wr1P ddwdt is the NOTES or MORTGAGE_or Soy et6a aoaCituli�add loos! secuM for Asa *OTPS, ASSIGAIEE cap. ■ to optica. reeove wM nrtlSea aU art eras. ioeoste, woo ,protia ar >hiy may hamar dao. ham ash PREMM wad ceder Soy ad 1i1 Lewes of NI or way prat o(tfta PRFJeUM ASSIGNEE %WtbertaRar matinw a aooaire aa6 t Wks aU tssb ttma.'Seurat =11p 1iihts. a boj ova aneh defatk ter Atfimha -hath ea�+t. and dorittt Ore ptndmry of way bemeloama psocadbefla. wad Ntbodsa debamcy. dmini Salt tirdeaptiaapseiod. C. ASM(INOR busby appaiM ASSIGNEE is Sue ad WvM ttaars)wid to poww of edimimind wick puna for ASSIGNEE in is otra alms wad aOadry a in the oars apd tgpamy of A�(iNOR loon tidatdr made the . VW a• Atatartpt:. a =&60C to detttaat cNim straw, std jive aoapfs asp n. fat twy tot a0 rates. marine and ptorta. a owq It= &a PRESSES: 01 a ASSIGNEESdlatsedorp f9 ,-Y, a m at tis may, pthar now o: paooaedeep wad tatter my seslanart of way tom, sitkrf s is ora aurae Or the amt Of ASS ar otherwise, which A55tONEE ttrny dts>• aeaa»sy a dtpirable to ardor to eotktts apd albtre ibt puytosat d is'ikts. l000•e wad prnDa. laaseea of the lalFhICSES tins barky a preedf =&wind a d dtsaed to pry aoy ani a0 antq>ms due ASSIGNOR pmwstra to da Lanam. a ASSIGM oe sam m ore as l NEE rn'y dada is tetitiaj; _ i delnead to wad teaaised by asb less tuba an a:pnasty rderid Of way' aid an deiy, rwhU . arabiipdaa m' ' ASSIWOR is nspeer of dl ps)me— so made. O. ASSIGNM is bamby rested wpb faii POM to ro tae alt me== legal wad atpohis, dsmed by !!! is y 'or proper to afore- thio AniplMt wed ro O Mot 1111! MM- mors. tend profits tmipad �lyder. . a+dtrdioa the rigM of ASSIGN est in deipea a ewer coca der PRFbASES, ar trap pea t>rt�oL ad sorb paareseioa of all or my past of Ate PREMISF3 toeemet alt d P prtrperry, lfamier. daearm, boats. lrPaN and a000tttata of ASSIGNOIt setsmq tkolm. ad a tmcd8t the ASSIC-14M its Salus ar W%=U. vb* taistEtaq ASSIGNOR hasty 2Mins hU porta and =tinier to ASSMEE to wades aR slaw. p -ftw. alit pons hneio t famed stray wad ail time ball a wit fa poartr a tate ud apply an of tie mss wad craw Irma• hssa M*Wd ro eta payment of as tale of =we&S wad op.earI Its s pltF MS and oc way ill"WMW ar lWtft4A=GW. M a ASST ME, Weintift bot Sot iisitld to to PWMof tats VWW aaa aanW ioacaaoe peao�r, &_V dsdtata. ae, nasot hie carts of mairaaias. mpdito • ttbuo"& ad * tk On ds PJtRIEW or of =Was same tumble. t MAk anlnrI 's fees iotattd s oWcedoa whb de alfsiommo of tib AwllipemQ. WdWft rmpdbm ft % tmd tdsb a apply is tsars do pQ, -- of I i 'll ' ad 1111ter t MOM dtts faom ASSIGPW to AMINFE.® Ass NOTES and da MORTGAGE A is tmeb artier a AMOM trap dtarmiae. ASSiMM ftn to WISff m ohliptiom go caws=_ of ptrtleeare gay d dao 0" or dam aafptld a IS Meander cw a P., I to dr GMy ens any of to aBUprti= Of des lessor nada way of tC Lases Md doe am wads say Of the IisbUhiesis =sed= wid er sehiq er psdq ria of the tasetmato tad aysata>a of ASS1ONOR is thn Innis. ASSIGMR kerehy apetw 10 htdatealry ASgoM sad to bolsi itkou as &M aq mhfSry,lo11. or 4112111111. bdudmg • trialtats 19aiasliaa. stdtir mo+stYs tis wbitk sty be tagltt ftt inorald M R ramsr is less a bP >t�oa of Wir l�/tlp®�. ate/ abs tad and aU titlarl and tissda shaaaswrwri3 wrap k attastad apidt ASSIGN)7fis g tlrsoa _ , ' el Spy wtOt�ed obiiisisaeor ea m pre s pasters or ttishtsp< SPP d>k terms. cowls, a r0aeatem , casasN b way of dw L.wa• it is ftnter swdenitd da thea AsApmae aha- as corse m pis=s I t' 3 for rite emtaetol. CM. u aapslr ce noir of the FMIMS. MS. ae owns them[. wn ASSIGNPE mer &W it 1pnraee to tsaakc ASSIG U Ibble for the petsaem of Soy M dw tams wnd ttnfitiom of my of tltc Lints. or dw way wawa d tt MMM by the fapoe sada my of the Leon or Sty after pwtty, or for very dte swmis Or dd wise eoodbw i of the PREMISES or for any neoiipm in the walpestmt• upkerp• rel»ir or amid ofthe PREAdISM seal inn in 2 60- 138 its 1 M. mi anawnB. ANDrOR ANY CO IRSE OF CONDUCT. COLUM OF DIrAUNCft STAMUM CWH.rnSER ' VMU AL OR RDSTllIf). LOAF ACCOi7rISr gOPaVACM Dl�Ol,B9. A?a3OM'AI i-- — A aF ANY =G), AMNW ACTKM OF UTOWANY TARTY MADE SaURL VPUW. OR AFiZR't� EXECU[Imet CW TRIS DOCLaMINr.. 'Am WATvm Amm.Qf TMM LvOMT AM PUTUB Dy84TI )M lO K OR DSD AMY LITLGATM. TTDS 4R+OVMN TS A MATl3IAL VWDCDMrT FOR AffiCN= f{vrzND1 w clxz TTO A53IS oiL IT IS EowimmY ASitEE T=AT NO TARTY Om ENTM HAS RMEMMM THAT TMS.WAMM vmL Pkyr ax . Q. VZNM APM J[>Rguc nam geld,19 IN DADE COUMT.,nm8lDA. FOR ANY. AFFMKATiVE OR DEVB IEGAL,PlbOCElIOII�GS � 001A'�CIIQt.�YTii '"m DOC[�3tI AN&= ANY OT:flit DOLL uwr admm d1' Tm AsuGxcst iN FAV4t mr FAVOR OV ASUGNEL 1N WTTNPSS WHEREOF. the said ASSIGNOR 6n owed dds atat® to be aped tad smW s of do date fits above w.itsae Sip>red. soled. wd ddiraed ASSIGNOR:. preatx of: FTTIVALD/ EMCLMVE CENTS t. INC. r a Ftaiat ampo ulm 9SC mL F Amite .� Miami 133I3 3313 0� tc1[p .! yxH..attf�. ,B1^ 04ERSON ALI)4 FR'MEW A3� i 9P V A L LS MMAVAUMS ASSIGNliE: ~ iia �r,c.oto,a�wc OCEwN eArM a mm baob<inScarpmnimL M K.W. Q AVENUE - ldfwAft. 36 :jz1 G its BY: WE r ATTEST: ✓ ' L `•'s• STATE OF FLORIDA } COUNTY OF DADE } THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT wo aesma dadped bdaa We this �S dsy of FibrM7,1997...., by EMERSON FITTIPAL DIL a Avidinof nTTIPALiN VMCUrM CE7NM. Dfr-.. a Rgft aaepetsisn, eo behalf of the axwmim. He produced his Fletldo DMds Bees a id-Mb=d— My Commis"m Espte: Nelda Vaidea. MINY PWls Stm of Florida wreA_ STATE OF FLORIDA }� swoMAL6� 2M (y-' a�erwnc�s�or oan.sc COUNTY OF DADE } THE 6 ONO INST&UWMM "M tMowlodpdd btdote arc this �0� dqr ed i0 cmy. l947.by 6022ii mdMARMO.LfANDULBY.s ViWPtrrideaadAUbM Sepm". tapt hdy. at OCEALY DAM. a was s>aatL4f hd alf of Ot ootpoodoa Thiry tss gatemBy lmosr� me. My comuiatoa Espbm,. Ntida Yaids. Ntstsy Ft6i'c Sale of FIM neooW9wcoo.c"14"vmm7A of ow ampo 0...sy p AMUM-ff" A W1DEYwcLam,*r �yr+rr MODAWAM =PMAL�IL� 140 W, i 7811 hm or iqpvy at deet: to my lesum. loccmw caViclM or arae or m,4,4 my SM juldensiM by the ASSIGNEE -t ch we km'ftim m vlclmum QLsvA mdfw hdcW bw, An _v2 ata of =y offi= or &m=r. or my caw wu that are no undertlitem kir RIM purpm of paiNsig At A&SMNU-S =Why j==. E ASSIGNEE may micue wccnlLg or rape adwr secasky. Mo teirmme MY PNIY'Pnmw4y or lacandm* 1,,,A, (at any JmdmbudmM 9@201d busby. may Sm Mcmgb=L awwab. or mdulpom wo rrapea to W& indelftften and may apply my &a AWL* tbetelar held by ASSIGNM to the socita:tbimar sat Wdebuibas wabout pcjudxa to any of its rights harander. F. ASSIGNEE may, as in option. al-ba4b it dma m be *bLipwd w 40 a, paf= 203, jcmc carve®= W DVCE= for mad am bcfofdmASMG?Mand wy =ades in 0 doing "I be Cbatplble jj6 u _ Ralm ' to the ASMGNOR Md added to the mdcbmdseu M=cd be". G. Waiver of or scip by ft ASSIGNM ha -y ddwk-by the ASMIJOR. or im3me of the ASWGMM to min Upon strict peeboemffi by the ASSIGNOR of aqy WaTmilas iw 'F! lbim Amt lipw --h-11 -Cr'dtL*Maff. H. The ngbsmdnmom"OfASSMNUadv abs Auip==mmcgoWadwand ugmt=Lisa of, btu are i0addft3=ro.obey oda rights dr I- aftbASSI(WIDESWIhaviundlerthe NOME. tbgUORTGAGE cwday adw' ammmaWg u=rky for dm NOTES. a low orlo'eqafty. I. If any tens 0(this Aw4M= or da qVilcatim thereof to my . pCOSM OF sbaU, to my umt. ba invalid or vamooI Ile. the musicift of ais AaF the RFO'- of W* harm so pmsous of tbn Amp=mms sMD be valid mod em6mmmWe w do hUm cmm pmttaiaed try lad. J. vvbowb-. pmrsmmoi to d AnWtu w. cum by ASSIGNEE is ==nary for the ukbg of so action. mch axmm " not be K. AJI,motim to be Sim pmm to lWs An*ttatat daD to adru;im if wmamd poop psepaid cartWind or gi mAd. tenon ra*p esgoeantd,tothe fiWowft' H addTzmetarthin potiesamino. aromb otber -mzm as a party may uqum m wrkk* ASSIGNOR FIrMALM ZXZCUnVE CENTER. MC.. 0 Ibmift cis MOW" M72PALZ!L Praidmmt 991 11mob Wmi A"mm Mi6d. IL 331M ®/copy: PWW L Twomild. Fail. M BritIM Ate. Soft SW MhmiL r1orlds 33131 ASSk2GF- OCRAN BANK 7M M.W. 42 AVENUE uhmol. m 33126 Any dm period powidad to die siring of may aott>s tiettmdrJ Amll cawmmm upas ft dame ash notim is riepacsited in L- The tem *AMGNM* and *ASSIGNEE* " be =usbud to kchiiis da belM Irenommt ripeteatedwt. WAM"Mart. Md - as=(. The Bagar and =9w mad In this An*amm = =md as a rail mme um MW =d iftli apply wtth 2w o affic wbedim be portio am of mmofinc or hx9ame j"mr. carpme or cow fain. and ft =jWm &ban larinn tmd ft pions. M. Mds An*mm mW na be &wood. .a►clogged.morabttdmirywivswamyprsnisim wmypoo basof be dFadve. a rapt ady by m bwtama in wdft m &*wd by as party qw-st of mly waiver. =w@d=mLcfixW =w28esbac, or ellmtimt>F is somg�L M. Nmb=g Wrein ownimd v the amma. ASSIGNOR aprements that Gera am no Imam ounrulay m mai mice nor dw my we armload Q AMIM2= AM ASMGNM SrZCVUAUT.AGR,M.T,HAT TWIV WAJVZ AILL RD== TO MY CK Ca ZMPM= ANTORALSTAIZMWn NAM PMR TO QRSlUINW4411INT10 7m stolam Cr TM D0CUmZXT- IF. AMMMIZ NO AMMM MMUZY KNOW NGM.. VOLAWARMY AM • - .10 1 ut,rZLLjGVMy wuvg M vzM ZMMAXT MAY HAVICTIOATNIAL XT SM TOANYMIGATKINDA OREM, ORARSM OUT Or, UNDEL 02,04 CMCMGN WrMTM DOCgWoff. AM= ANY AGREpAcRr CoNflEMATED TO 29 23MCUTSD IN COKAYNCTM 780 H.W. 4bd A%am Nand Flackfa )9121 4. AsupoterSommad Pwr dm How: Am V an Loliv~ 4L UM4AdftM 4k ay. S. It. 23p Cab S. 7111 Fkmz* fats mosso do iaYeras typo ar sae pr pmmmszry It" dWJ0m 89 0011 Pmpww ON Vbict WOW WA 6~ of JWad wbm meow. tf momm mm b sm"hic smomb 2ddkNatil aas� ---SEE RIDER ATTACHED AND MADE A PART HEREOF -- a cbma my 9 opfisibb. Prodow of wasmad an A" sammadfadhowfive Ddmwisa=wnmiWmllV. one" 7. c3ow I am! dwudf I 4w Aws some IN unimmIL Doussmamy Imaw I= a mor woobw simetwund dumar!mwer—m mossom as coMmost. dray mipx so a momM hoomme a awfint pumisamin vbm s wal bpoo* 01111," Must of bbws amin dam" me &a maL immune was own". ma Spam tar um of Fatty QvIor 0&,WXW ail c Cha EU-1 ft moomber ow"a6wa mons"' 'd al D&SE(s) it ZbCDJIW FFMAWL 0 PA11211010 df FrrnrM= ZZ03"m cornk W- stparG ds Alar. b. Son" Faft or ir Ax%WmL bY 1, ISV.-Moa at= Z-) — IL COW OL OCIAN DAM 11 SGAR vck (Arm mw v."i 70 ILW. 4W Afftwo. SUN* JU HWK r"Wo. 331m STANDARD FOM - R mi jei- 7 rt IVA; STATE OF FLORIDA UNIFqRm Cow-4ERCLAL CODE FINANCING STATEMENT Foitm Ucc-1 (Uv.j 993) Ito Famome ftmmm is I a a Me after st flit Powis 0 dor Undomm coommaxw caw Orr ffirgh FEZ Ia. FrnVALW EUDCUMS L'X?CrE3L- INC-, r Fkwi& of or i; lb hWin Aftm 1e. cky. SOW IA. Calc 9w army Arnow no 33130 94 Z Addimand ad oar at Train fivion aim Nout Fift as bdxvWvmO 23. Dow of aim or Im 10 94 ]b khdiog A"m 2c. f4'- saw cam I Sommal " 4Aw Wom dm holividad) ocy-kri BANK 4. magm Adim -736. c9l. sate 780 H.W. 4bd A%am Nand Flackfa )9121 4. AsupoterSommad Pwr dm How: Am V an Loliv~ 4L UM4AdftM 4k ay. S. It. 23p Cab S. 7111 Fkmz* fats mosso do iaYeras typo ar sae pr pmmmszry It" dWJ0m 89 0011 Pmpww ON Vbict WOW WA 6~ of JWad wbm meow. tf momm mm b sm"hic smomb 2ddkNatil aas� ---SEE RIDER ATTACHED AND MADE A PART HEREOF -- a cbma my 9 opfisibb. Prodow of wasmad an A" sammadfadhowfive Ddmwisa=wnmiWmllV. one" 7. c3ow I am! dwudf I 4w Aws some IN unimmIL Doussmamy Imaw I= a mor woobw simetwund dumar!mwer—m mossom as coMmost. dray mipx so a momM hoomme a awfint pumisamin vbm s wal bpoo* 01111," Must of bbws amin dam" me &a maL immune was own". ma Spam tar um of Fatty QvIor 0&,WXW ail c Cha EU-1 ft moomber ow"a6wa mons"' 'd al D&SE(s) it ZbCDJIW FFMAWL 0 PA11211010 df FrrnrM= ZZ03"m cornk W- stparG ds Alar. b. Son" Faft or ir Ax%WmL bY 1, ISV.-Moa at= Z-) — IL COW OL OCIAN DAM 11 SGAR vck (Arm mw v."i 70 ILW. 4W Afftwo. SUN* JU HWK r"Wo. 331m STANDARD FOM - R mi jei- 7 � °1 T548 8�= EnIBff'A' RIDER TO FIMANCM SfATE!} OM (form ICCJI: Tfks Financing Statement covers the fololriry types and 1101 5 Of propo tr A5 ProPertp nght5 at any kid whatlosver, whether nal,,personSt 1". or ofltenras. whether tangbte cr 1nargbb• encumbered by Unst Cerlaht mortgge of avert diff herewith vmm ft Debtor. es iearmI" tion iwaveabwe. in favor of the Secured Party, ere den!lptd h�eirbow. antl �niaanConng Cnt comb persei d real estate sifaab in DACE COUKiY, FbrkW and kpslty deaeribed am Lots 4 and i and the Meg 50 feet of Las 1. 2 sW 3 M Block 72IlWM, CRY OF VWft, acwrdlap to the Pisa thereat. as seeonlea ii Plat Bad[ IV at Pape 41, of the PWIk: Rwanda of Dade County. Fadds. — AND— Loft t 22.23 and 24. Bloch 71. SCUTK CRY, CF KMNI. sccaeldQnO to the Plat fheroot, are +warded In Plat so,* a as Page 41 of Me Pub&'1iR0otda of Dade Cawdy. FiOtda LESS On Ent Bm (a) feet of said Lot 24 wad the sterni ane of a Coma► arwe eoneaw to the "creme" aa+rtrip a radius ad �reall/-dfrh'i I tiaatsud tsn0e�s trhklt an btengMwe M tact NoAh of and pmON v ff1 to 40.8-41 teed ift titflNt Md "ft (301 teat vUiet at and panow ,Mel 't" GOVISUfts'af Set NNW Avems. vicka np this ib bw=F The abaVM of We ocvering Bald mat piaperty, srtd a0 hxlnft s, 4n W irgs. l6d�m; goods, ""m" and irtvsrt0ory of DabOw. NO It - WM "I thereof anp arty Mpi vete rrbt Ogg which ars now or may A weafEtr be beefed and snob on M tmW pnopatty OesgEed in sera era 0:0 nd err► strucl irss and in mvsffw s rim err hasellat an said WW and ma fomuns ailatele0 thaslelo, sro or err sny vmy pwu** g, and the ants lewM. and ,plow tlehepot and atao as alts sstah, tnirfsot and as deters and dwrwnds whamtaever. as wed in Ir as in SptflA►, at the Dewar in Ord to ttr urine and It eey Far and pwcW liveeat, and also a/ pas and Uatft tadlarw. fa6at0rs• Ieae. ai of+n�ioufgq. e4+r'ornwr. rtlaldinary, boiieat, wq* eleva = and ffwM . both tuba. Oft slaterdoom mar Ossim pOes, tatoss and onwr plumbing and hMM fbmaea, nrsdsl&te0, la g pwnfp eii d io. boi m wtidos SCI qtr. assn doors, venetian b9►ds. 510111 ahUftZ and am r I err W tV Defiler, efridt ser iM. ' hereaf err pwwh to or tw taw faith. in or or. sale p10nMaet, earl p�otlptt 4he1r;d dtttadlad err. and the hazard ht umas pe&y e>NemV said PWni ss, fopaI tf dA any enc a/ etaiort and thOaof, and arty and, sD rlglt0e tlttreurtder, 5140 array attd . Vft af,eubtapatbll provide . said mottpegs, E or srfaeg t xmWdw any monew it any aerloar aeooatbt @M fdhdd of aarue8 p=rod to tail e1gr70apa r any properly or ether iteng of v"w ao4rdrsd ekh or pad for by dry **m or kxfh rsrlwneu pt+uant b said rj nnrtpsge and Oy dsmfaQes auaCed VWsU Nt m mtds+le+ation o► iifee+ert dbfrww proaaQiitp.ap aeeorntamd by said ovumtieps. ' cvwras+4.,f,1 - ,�ra0ila��,wplmf� - - rso.armwT.aan°` - HARMRUM ��• � ;:'.t-:R' . .� j';"%•R°`�'.• 'Civ" } Pi.:.1~.a . h P t 1 . v .G V ,.. err,-t,)t -CF/, 0�''`''�' `f�,'y,1+•t� ; IF I.1t�1,+�'u�. ♦- -J r' ...r,;'Nr .rx�Z;,T,��I�',��` I R - .I� � _ _ JT .6 J ? - ... t-r .. � d.-•. t t ►� .., :.�.��"�.;.n, A � �S a�4, ! R I . r•M tit ..i.+¢'Z tin' ♦ . f.-,.7.♦,. y..._ L •fT -t • a ,._i:l.- ip i" _ ., 1. y I I r •1? ta:'y .ve4 %'J i •S t77 Ft. '15 ori 10 ZZ EE± 9591 rc 703 LOCATION: 950 SOUTH MIAMI AVENUE, MIAMI, FLORIDA COVENANT TO RUN WITH THE LAND JPHIS COVENANT, made and entered into this . day of !" A.D., 1977, by and between 950 SOUTH MIAMI AZSOCIATES LIMITED, (A Florida Limited Partnership), hereinafter called OWNER, and THE CITY OF MIAMI, a municipal corporation of the State of Florida, in the Count,: =f Dade, hereinafter called CITY; and WHEREAS, 950 SOUTH MIAMI ASSOCIATr LT_:>ITED, (A=?c^!•,a Limited Partnership), !s the ree o::•ner of Lot: 2., �3 and Zu, Block 71 South, City of 'iazt, according to tl:e Plst thereof, as recorded in Plat Book E, at Fare 11, of the o-abl!c Re_or•:c of Dade County, Florida, AIVA 950 'auto Ian! ;�•:+auc, '•tion..`_, Florida, hereinafter called ?RENTS :C. WHEREAS, CITY, pursuant to Chivter 54, ;7o:t1o,. Code of The City of Miami, Florida, as ameta•led b,-. 1tr..tic No. 7990, No. 3:55 and .:o. 4352 r•es:eet!vel , r•enilr•e: that concrete sidewalk and/or curb and cutter shall at t!:e :;.+1•. exr•:::n of OWNER Le constructed, rec.nst:•uct•!d rt-r_-•Irr.-A adjacent to private rroperty that !^ De!n.. . •rr a!r v.; ...tr.:rint t -D building permits {-s_ued b:: CI='Y. art! WHEHt:AS, the vxi3t :g -id ..^i3: 13-!' ..-t1 autter are nct in proper alignment 41th the Bas., ulld n.- Line ad' -,cent t_ -he r:1st Lot Line of PP.EXISES (Lot being, located 5 feet Easteri therefrom and parallel the-•ewith: tact: WHEREAS, O NER asks zc be rel!eved :, the ohllrntic:: r at !- time to relocate the side.3lk, curb and tr.;tter at the Bate Bu!lld!n. Line adjacent to the us- Lct lin- of =R:.. 'Sc... (1--t _-t), ind in consideration o the ^c ? z..cc . , ........ s-r�^s �� to construct the aforesa_: improvements at P!'E'ii: ES the Sale cost and expense or NOW, THEERi=ORE, in cons!de^ation of the PrF_:1_' !7 here!r. re - out, OWNER hereby ccienants and acrees with CI"Y to demolish the existing sidewalk, and gutter, e=cvinr th" ettsuing deb:!__ and constructing net concrete side- alk, curb .and +:utter at the Base Building Li: _ t^ Lot `apt ^t tine of PRE:;ISE;' (lot 24) upon thirty ~(30) days written notice .r•rr.. the Direct^r of the Department of Public :corks of The CitY =f addressed to the OWNER at S George 0. !old, Eng%. , butte 60S, 66 West Flagler Street, ';±ami, =lorida :3130. It is expres517 agreed that this obliiration shall be bit,.dtn. upor. OWNER and also heirs, successors in interest or assl:ns o: OWNER., and aball be a condition implied in any conveyance or other Instrument affecting the title to the nfor•esaid ra_.1SFS or- an. -,r portion thereof.. In the eve..^.t that 0%'?!F3 shall fail to cauze the aforementioned Improvements to be ccrstructed at PRE-11SE1 as hereinabove providel, within thirty (30) days after the mailing of thc w-ltten notice from the Director of the Department of Publ'c York, of The City of Miami, Florida, then the City '4anager of The City o' Miami, Florida, shall act as agent of 0WNE.R of any lot or parcel of land described in the written. notice, which agency is hereby specifi- cally created, and said City Manager shall cause the aforementioned improvements to be constructed at the expense or' OWNF3 and the amount of such construction cost shall be declared and established as a lien on the property of such defaultlnp 04'NF.R and enforced as any lien for materials furnished and work and labor done, provided under the Statutes of the State of Florida. 40 F- EL 991 rc 704 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the OWNER has caused these presents to be executed and signed in his name the day and yea- first above set forth. Sigried, Sealed and Delivered in the Presence of: itrness S':ATE.OF FLORIDA ) COUNTY'OF DADS ) I HEREBY CERTIFY tat on _!pis daY i•ersonaliy ftnrenre. bee--,: e me, an officer duly aath r1_ed to a:dn!nister r_ths an:! _ake acknowledgeaents,J ^,'''•' ;ereral rsrtner of the 950 SOUTH MIAMI ASSC�CIA:wc L:...,ED, (A Florida Limited tartnershir.), to me well known to to the persons described 1:: and whc exs:_ted the foregoing instrument an -1 ac•rnowledred be!'are me _hat the-.- executed herexecuted the same freely and yoluntar'l, for the rurros_c therein expressed. ' y WITNESS sir h.:n:i ani zrel -%= .:.am:, .:c:.nt of Dade j and State of Florida, "ay C:Ups. a _4 5!v Cocrlssle: Exr+res- r7 r•a1lC, .t +t•' o' =.Cr_ia at a: ;e APPR A' TO =0 % a COR?_C NES' i Attbrrey APPR9VE - '4C4" j Director, Deea:•tment ..'-t=-c Werks UUM9.wmM+- - ?his. IASL recent ?revare .1L'3/ . r ra w.n. nwr . RlCyt1tAP.II,il�cr Department of Lar. atuc0=XT wu City o:' ::ia.^1, rlor!da _ 2 _ 6. ep ' L_ i 06- COURTHOUSE TOWER DATE t LOCATION nr16360"0906 oar♦ a n v+ -w ncen CE '�4t-C:..�r•ri�3 1994 nay n lewo THIS INDC%-M E. Made this I -day of May. A.D., 1994, Betwe:a V.T.R. REALTY. INC a Florida CorPOMO n (Federal ID Na. i -OMI 10), of the County of Dade. In the State of Florida. Parry of� first part. whose post oftlo c address is i.•Gt'L'7 z. D. tt G ); '00, sad. it!'ITIPALDI EXECLM V E CENTM INC, .,.� (F ) Al Florida corpetsdon. of the County of Dade. State of Florida. whose past office address is il•=��; '�. - ; 1. tV� , r n. • (1 f t� - Ih Parry of the second part. t: ` (.M1yM�w�nae sad Mira. tar ane Taw !tiny toed 'faaa/ rwrf siva hese a WA- ed p "&L 1'r— po 4wrMwe sur... ane .. T 01 rYlrask. W'0 as doommuw and =Mrs of GWVW8aaWR. a+%W"W An gram on adolka M requi -) WITNESSEM That the said Party of the first part. for and in etmsideratiwl of the sum of Ten DOOM ($10.00) in hand paid by the said Parr of the second pert. the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledge4 have granted, bargained, and add to the said Parry of the second pert., their. heirs and assigns forever. the following described land. situate. and being in the County of Dade State of Florida. to wit: The West 50 feet of moos 1.2 and 3, in Bled! 72. SOUTH CITY OF MIAMI. according to the Plat there as recorded to Plat Book *Jr. at Page 41. of the Public Records of Dade County. Florida Folio # 01.=4)20-1020 EINSMDEt 4,2%K:.tai VAij 3 0 SUBJECT TO: HARVEY kWll•. CLERa WIDE tOWTr. Ft L Conditions, testsictioos. limitations and casemenia of record. if any. 2. Taxes and anesuncum for the yew 1994 and thereafter. And the said Parry of the first past does hereby fully warrant the tide to said land, and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all peraoas w►haQdsoeva. IN VVITN W WHEREOF, The acid Party of the first par I= hereunto set his band and corporate seal the day and year first above wrriteen. V.T.R. REALTY. INC. `r".c. TOR o.� . carw} .`, SS .) ,. ,. tarts aw+s STATIC OF FIARiDRUVK A . ) Aso st aruit 4 CN1XV COU NIT or DADS ) 0001118 I HEREBY CERTIFY. that as this day, before site. an r State aforesaid and In the County aforesaid to take a VICTOR DAL&4K Frasdiiaat of V.TX REALTIl, WC, produced his drivers license as identificattan and a did WITNESS my land and official seal thL�_ day This instrument was prepared try: Manuel M. Arm=. P.A. 2UW S. Dbde Hwy., Suite 101 Miami. Ftorubi 33133 NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF FLORIDA twata a. ATMlaY w esrao®irex ssgv oov" AM IL con saar•pwwwnurr.r.. / �4�41 1� 7' O Y c 3 v Yl1 CouRi;1LIVSE TOMER OATf � tOCa�- e - fIt1C:��360�Q•Yt�� 94k231.':1422 1994 RAI 1t 16:M OUff-CLAIM DEED THIS QUIT -CLAIM DEED, executed this. h.day or May, 1994. by JOEL RUSIN, a married man. whose post office address is ZV 15i :....eb, ply- :tet tp %( 11..�j.__' jar it.,( first pasty. to V.Tat_ REALTY, INC, a F da cot poem! on. wh" past office address is 7 t ap.. D . s r �.- • ! �'t d lot, i�isl c,.�, 1 L second Party' WITNESSETH. That the said party of the first part. for and in consideration of the sum of Ten (510.00) Dollars and NallOO ..to wit in band paid by the acid party of the second part, the receipt whereof is beteby acknowledged, does hereby reprise, release and quit -claim unto the said second porgy forever. all the.right. title, interest, claim and demand which the said first party has in and to the following described lot. piece or panted of :aitd. aureate, lying and beim in the County of Dade State of Florida, to wit: The West 50 feet of Left 1. 2 and 3., in Blcek 72. 'SUU'Ii•1 CITY OF MIAMI. according to the Plat there as recorded in Plat Book W. at Page 41. of the Public Retards of Dade Cosenty, Pintids• oocstrort 248. 4v Sua1: 186.30 Folio ♦ 01-02074020-1020 +uavE r kuvlN. t LEka DAOE t twNTr. <L This property does not constitute the homestead of the Grantor nor any contiguous land thereof. The O tentor resides' at 70 -1 9-1c. --e i• UP( c { •i . t. e% . TO HAVE AND. To HOLD the saute together with all and singular the appurtenances thereunto bek+oginger in anywise appertaining. and all the estate. right. title, interest. lien. equity and claim whatsoever of the said fust parry. either in law or equity to the only proper use. benefit.and behoof of the said second party forever. 1N WITNESS WHEREOF, The said party of the first part has hereunto set his hand and seal the day and year first .above written. Signed. sealed and delivered In the presence ct: % : WMArm tip _U4MAa" IL J RUSIN --� araamow.r+'aa+a+� . vwe....w 11�it� � 1 resrr s. w.®.. aerrsaui e0low i�if//YSis7Z'-��✓ 1 «ewv9WIDD am of one tt am* STATE OF FLORIDA ) 88 .. . . COU?nV OF DAD6 ) . 1 HLUKUY CFJMFY, that on ibis day before me. an cfRPrr duly aadtastsed .ia the State aforesaid and in the Courtly sfor- Koo takesckuowicdgmenp4 penxawlly appeared; JOUL RUMN, a ] nWdCd taiga %&o has produeed .his drivart Reense n: J&UtMsation and whn did take an wrath., WITNE.5S my hand and ofiietal seal this G Obey of M` 1944. "t?eis instrument wws-prepnrrd by: Manuel M. Arvesu. Esq. 2000 S. Dixie dory., Suite 101 Miami. Flo,ids 33133 STAIM p - _' "pp'r t,� ►u� Or COUR-4USE `'CW£R, rlolo cou::ou OEM"GhLEaw• o cmew fr 1 Tax Deed File 4usbar 93-442 Property Identifleatlor. No. 01-0207-020-1020 { _ w: li T A X D E E D IF c z u c Pm Ra CS a.ae MV 2 F s STA': OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF DIZE Tax Sale % -tlflette Number 90-574 tissued on June 01. 1991. ;na the app ,.r the isrlance of A tax deed was flied In the offlCO of the Dade - r has Collector. The applicant baving ps:d or redeemed all other taxes or tax *a 19 cortiflCatss ^n the property daserlbed below, 3.1d due ndtlu of sate having been published. and no person entitled to do so having appeared to redeem said land. Such lead was sold for ash ter" 00"K946 "cow nes to: JOEL RUSIN ss900raiwaj _ whose address ts: Y.O. BOX 402279 Killwy Num MIAMI BEACH. FL. 33140 drat CrAMff Cap" � 4 . . belna the h(gheSt bineaw.r at t" P:LDIIC =10 1161.1 On Jecuary Ob. 1Y94. and who has paid the sure of his bid as required by the lags of thi• state. NOM, on January 10. 19" the County of Dade, State of Florida. In consideration of the UM of t se4.777.b0) FI�wr FGUR TKOUCANP SEVER IfulvRED SFtlfMrV SFVFP; ALP S.ITCP ------•--- -- Wilars does !hereby "II the roltoatng tends situated In Dode'County. Florida. and described as follows: WG0FT OF LOTS 1-2 L 3 BL1K 72 CITY OF 111-111611I SOUTH PIP 8-41 •.� W l t naassed by: HARVEY RUVI M Clark of Circuit Court / D2.ad*ty. for lata �.•• • Y• - t"'rZ BY: . t tSEAL7 �.` RK BEFORE ME. the undersigned ary public, persona lI veered B. A FremAjiDCI . Deputy Clerk of the Clrcul! court In for Dade Cotinty. Florida, who Is Personally known to ma and vhbe aetthawlad W the sxeeut10" of tro s hnstrunhent to be his own free act and dead for the use and purposes therein mentioned. SHORN TO AND StAISCA IaED BEFORE WE ON January 10. 1904 RCITARY N=ARY "XU C1TA-M Oy Rai1DA !! COMPAZZIONP11MCC3921KIS 4lotery Pubt ic. $ o%* of Florida, At Largs My CesolSOM Ea* MAR 12-W, THIS DEED IS SUBJECT TO COVERNMEXTAL TAXES AND LIENS. AND TO ANY RIGH, INTEREST. PIJRLIC This Instrument prepared by EASEMENTS. RESTRICTIONS. AND CDVENANTS THAT Snack Davis YAY SURVIVE THE ISSUAN= OF THIS TAX DEED IN Deputy Clark of Circuit Court ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE LAW Dade County. Florida MjN it 89R2{VJi�i Br 0742-7-850 l .0 X 11 s lr .6Mp 1LiV0/SiOf I�VO/BiL gni . Sea 12 T Sa S, Rg E R 14147821 � �""► A a llkj v�rp 41 EASEM T The undersigned. in consideration of the payment of S1.00 and other good and valuable conside-r %km, the adequaa and reaipt of which Is hereby acknowledged, pant and give to Flarida Power A Ldght Company. its licenseesagent, tacesasoss, and assigns, ari easement ton+ever for the Gorst va. tion. oparatiou ' and mains once of overhead and underground electric utility. [sdlitiet (inelu lbs wires. poles, guy% cables, conduits and appurtenant equipment) W be installed from time to time: with the right to reconstruct, improve, add to, enbL*. chem tits vottaae, as won as. the -aim of and tamove sucb facgitks or my of thea within an eaaemsnt described 6, follows: THE EAST TEN ( 10) FEET OF THE WEST 50 FEET OF. LOTS 1. T and 3, HLOCIC 7= OF 'MAP OT MLUM ACCORPTNO..TO THE PLAT THEREOF. AS"RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK B, AT PAGE, .41 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF DADS COUkTY, FLORIDA LESS THE SOUTH 15 FEET OP SAID LOT 1 IALYP 0;1 THE EAST 15 FEET OF THE WEST 50 FEET OF THE SOUTE 15 FEET OF SAID LOT 1. rS s Calmed s _SUarIAx Cm Sumps Con aced Coss 't' nnrenper. Tea Catoeted f �- ak R eRnnYsr. . wna. Ina. Br Tng tlser with tree tight to permit any other . firm or arpoation to attach W= to any facRities hereunder and by able and conduit within the eaumeat and to operate rite urge for oommuniatlons purposes: the right of Ingres and egrets to odd premises at all threes; the richt to dear the land and keep it cleared of all treat, undetprowth rod other obstructions within the, easement area; to trim and cat and keep et sod nall dead, week, landng a daie�stays Ltea vi UmW butsidc nt the easement s:;s relish -1igllt it1l "s with or, telt apon the gra or systems of commrudatioas or power trmsmissim or dd tributim; and iorther wasti4 to the thil- ad went the undersigned has the power to grant. if at all, the r!ljhU hereinabim-granted on the laved heretofore described, over. song, under and woes tea roads, stress or highways al. lob t g or through aid property. IN VII VYHER80F. the undered has signed and sued this instrument on . 19 Signed. sealed and delivered W .+u 01 *. in the presence of: ewer MOND S Std P. 28na= Y am Corset must P. Attest. witma Secretary (Corp. Seal) STA'IZOr �iPdr%lrA AMtMtiN7Yt1P.. �J� The foresotng instrument was acknrm i before me this day of by 40-11 end- _ •—Gty01,. MCommission Expires: Not ut, St�of !diem P"L Slab of l Mus / A ar geemasive Isis 30/008 I � � •-. ' -. er ocr -z PH T 39 - 8 8R 36 4 614 etc. 1385 f ri 585 C09== 1='. WIYB MS LAW Uff FAVOR Of T!U CM OF MAMI THIS COVENANT, Bade and entered into this day 1988, by VICTOR BALSAM, a single men, (the "OWNER"), and the CITY OF MIAMI, a municipal corporation of the State of Florida, in the County of Dade, (the "CITY"); WITHESSETH: .WHEREAS, VICTOR BALSAM:, a single man. is the fee Oi,`NER of tre West 5.^ Feet of Lots 1, 2, 3 and all of Lots u and 5, BLOCK 72 S, CITY OF. MIAMI, according W U'.w: plat ttlx—ncof, as recorded rn P)^t Poe* B, at Page 41, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, with a street address as follows: 901 S. Miami Avenue, (the "PREMISES"); and WHEREAS, Section 5'+---*( ur Li>e Cwe of Lige Ciaa req.:ires that r., for construction, reconstruction, rewdeling, renotation or repairing in the amount of $25,000 or more ;n value. or covering 650 :,; uzr•e feet or more In floor/surface area Tor an cuiiairw aLruvLwe .,, •• y �, ya, wiup • eCi a� tj v-- ;: Issued until all portions of the applicant's lot, tract or parcel of land ly+ng within the CITY's officially established right-of-way have been dedicated to the public for street purposes; and WHEREAS, Section 54-48 provides that in the event a porti.)n or the existing building or structure is allowed to reeain within the CM's officially established right-of-way the owner of the structure shall execute a covenant running with the land in fa%or of the CI''T before a building permit 13 issued, wherein the owner agrees to dedicr.te that portion of his property under thr ener"achnrnt and within the officially established right of ,way to the CITY and to remove• any encroachments whenever the existing building or structure 2a de®llshed or dacaged beyond repair; and WWMF.AS. OWNER . has requested CITY to allow an existing encroachment described as follows: Building encroaches into wemt 5 feet of Lot 5 and the 25 foot corner radius on the northwest corner of Lot 5. Block 72 S. CITY OF MLIAMI, ac--ordins to the plat thereof, as recDrded in Plat Book B, at Page 41, Of the Public Records of Dade Couity, Florida, ("MCROACHMEb?') to remin within the indicated area of the public right-of-way lying between the platted or dedleated rilpt-of-wajr line and tt.= established Wse tullding /:ne; zvi:! 6. &c: 13851 K 586 WHEUtPAS, OWKER has requested CITY to issue the building permits fcr renoatiao of a building on, the PREMSES although a portion of the PREMISES is located within the CM's officially establiahed :right-of-way and has not•been Cadidated to the public an set''fbrth herel;naboee; NOW, THEREFORE, us• consideration of the . p. 3es OWNER hereby `covenants, promises and agrees as fullowss' '.. OWNER shall dedicate that portion. of the PRE?ISE4 within the officially established right-of-way and under the ERMACiT+ENt to CI Ti and shall remnve,the ENCROACHMENT at its own cost and expense at such time as the ENCROACHMENT is demolished or da®gad beyond repair. 2. OWNER does hereby covenant to- indemnify, defend,' save and .hold harmless CI1Y freAn any claims demands' or liabilities of any nature whatsoever arising out of or because of this instrument. 3. This Covenant shall .be recorded in the Public Records- of Dade County, Florida and the provisions hereof shall CIMULute a Covenant Running with the. Land and shall recaln • in Still force and effect and be binding upon ._ t:2!rz , �y.Mwgwnrl in dn!!rMt"..& , gr;mnthold assll�s, and shall . ., _ . be a condition implied iii any -• eenvey4nce or otnw .�w:.:,:�N :f'•^e ins the tit1to of the aforesaid PREMISES or any portion thereof. IN WITNEhS WHEREOF, GwNVMM ina sassed thC= ;:",cess t_ tie exi! -i A i4nd signed In its name by its proper officer and ita,corporatow seal to bL affixed hereto on the date first above seL forth. t Signed, Sealed and Delivered in the Presence of: t t ad as to, We Lure,• R BALSAK, a single own mala t ase 4F Aowe33 Zod as to511narf- 12 meas PrIq raw 6' 1401-eas ; _ _ Q- r [F f• b ib a: 138519 567 3TATa or moraDA) C1aJri'i Or DADE ) I =98f CCRTIFY that on this day parsonaliy appeared before me, an offtoer dyly authoftsed to administer caths and talc! adcnoxledgmeets, VICTOR BAL AM, a single mn, to ae well Worn to be, the pwsm described. 1n and who oamted ttr tbmScd fg trfserimeft and aammledged before me that he 'executed the gas lYwly and voluntarily for the purpose therein expressed. YIZN= 4 ?fond and ofi'iclal seal at Miami, County of Dade and State of FlW1da, thisAjp day of.�!"•.,/1wjow A.D., 1988. WFAsr ruatx Ma OF Fly C&Eamion Expires: Notary Public, State -:T Flor-lem at Large Y. '�Or J tf�i�,•i 3 Y: '0 • •ii t APPROYID AS TO FORM PREPARED BY: APPROVED: Jean MRRECrX SS tY ttorney Department o awrtmentb s i i ►faop .f�.,.p Rti� uc1ii� p. •I CUAA CaCLn y ZONING FACT SHEET Case Number: 1999-0286 10 -Jan -00 Item No: 1 Location: Approx. 900, 901,920 S. Miami Ave. and Legal: (Complete legal description on file with the Office of Hearing Boards) Applicant: Brickell Main Street, LTD A. Vicky Garcia -Toledo, Esq. 200 S. Biscayne Blvd 200 S. Biscayne Blvd. Suite 2500 Suite 2500 Miami, FL 33131 Miami, FL 33131 App. Ph: (305) 350-2409 Rep. Ph: (305) 350-2409 ext _ Rep. Fa (—) = ext _ Zoning: SD -7 Central Brickell Rapid Transit Commercial -Residential Districts Request: Approx. 900, 916-918 SE Miami Ave. Rd., 10,20,26,36,50,60,62-64 SW 9 St., 1,25,29,41,43,45,47,55,57,59,75,81 SW 10 St., and 926-928 SE 1 Ave. Special Exceptions as part of a Major Use Special Permit for Brickell Main Street, as listed in Ordinance No. 11000, as amended, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Article 6, Section 607, SD 7 Central Brickell Rapid Transit Commercial -Residential District, to allow a Bar/Lounge open to the public within the SD -7 District, and per Article 9, Section 917.1.2, Valet Parking, generally, to allow valet parking up to fifty percent of existing offstreet parking spaces. Continued from Zoning Board Hearing of 12/20/99. Purpose: This will allow a mixed use multistory structure on this site. Recommendations: Planning Department: Approval with conditions Public Works: No comments Plat and Street Committee: N/A Dade County Transportation: No comments Enforcement History, If any C.E.B. Case No: N/A Last Hearing Date: Found: N/A Violation(s) Cited: N/A Ticketing Action: NIA Daily Fine: $0.00 Affidavit Non -Compliance Issued on: Warning Letter sent on: Total Fines to Date: $0.00 Lien Recorded on: Comply Order by: Go- 188 GY�Y. OF 7 IRDDRP DRATED 1 ZONING FACT SHEET 'C0.. F Case Number: 1999-02W 10 -Jan -00 Item No: 1 CEB Action: History: . Analysis: Please see attached. Zoning Board Resolution No: ZB_ 2000-0257 Zoning Board: Approval Vote: 5-4 City Commission: N/A Analysis for Special Exceptions for the BRICKELL MAINSTREET PROJECT located at 900 South Miami Avenue CASE NO. 199.9-0286 Pursuant to Ordinance 11000, as amended, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, the subject proposal for the Brickell Mainstreet Project has been reviewed to allow the following Special Exceptions: • Special Exception per Article 6, Section 607 to allow a Bar/lounge, open to the public, within the SD -7 district; • Special Exception per Article 9, Section 917.1.2 to allow Valet service to a hotel. The requested Special Exceptions are for the purpose of allowing a hotel development within the proposed mixed-use project to accommodate a Bar/lounge and provide valet parking. The project consists of 175,500 sq. ft. of retail and restaurant use and a total of 288 hotel rooms, with 1,040 parking spaces, for the property located at approximately 900 South Miami Avenue within the Brickell area (see attached legal description, location maps and aerial photographs for exact property boundaries). Note: These Special Exceptions also encompasses the subordinate permits listed on the attached zoning write-up. The following findings have been made: • It is found that the proposed retail and hotel development project will benefit the Downtown District by creating a new hotel use in the Central Brickell area to serve Downtown area business travelers and visitors. • It is found that the subject of these Special Exceptions, specifically a Bar/Lounge and Valet Service for the proposed project, are completely within the scope and character of the project given that it is a high density hotel .project to be located within the Central Brickell area of Downtown Miami. • It is found that upon referral of the proposed project to Public Works and the Downtown NET Office, the following comments were received: o- 1. Pursuant to the Department of Public Works, the project requires plans for proposed sidewalk and swale area improvements prior to the . issuance of a building permit; and 2. Pursuant to the Downtown NET Office; the applicant shall submit a parking plan for construction employees and temporary parking arrangements for the existing building while the new building is under, construction; said parking plan shall .be subject to the review and approval by the Department of Planning and Zoning prior to the issuance of any building permits. • It is found that the Department of Planning and Zoning is in concurrence with these comments and will require compliance with the above referenced conditions prior to the issuance of any building permits for the proposed project. • It is found that the project depicts a total 'of 3 vehicular drop off areas to serve the . project. One of these 'is on S.W.9' Street (serving the retail component of the project); and the other two are on S.W. IOd .Street (one of which serves just the hotel, and the other serves the retail component of the project). Being that S.W. 1& Street is a designated Primary Pedestrian Pathway, the department contends that providing 2 drop off areas on S.W.:10`' Street is excessive and will detract from the pedestrian character anticipated for that street. The project does not require 3 drop off areas in total. The drop off area serving the retail component of the project located along S.W. 10' Street should be eliminated so that addition on -street parking may be provided to serve the project. e It is found that with respect to all additional criteria as specified in Section 1.305 of Zoning Ordinance i 1000, the proposal has been reviewed and found to be adequate. Based on these findings, the Department'of Planning and Zoning is recommending approval of the. requested Development Project with the following conditions: 1. Pursuant to the Downtown NET Office, the applicant shall submit a parking plan for construction employees while the new building is under construction; said parking plan shall be subject to review and approval by the Department of Planning and Zoning prior to the issuance of any building permits. 2: Pursuant to the Department of Public Works, the applicant shall provide plans, for proposed.. sidewalk and swale area improvements prior to -the the . issuance of a building permit. 3. Pursuant to* the findings herein regarding the proposed vehicular drop `off areas,. the drop off area serving the retail component of the project located along S.W.'10`'' Street should be eliminated so, that addition on -street parking may be provided to serve the project. Miami Zoning Board Resolution: ZB 2000-0257 Monday, January 10, 2000 Mr. Ricardo D. Ruiz offered the following Resolution and moved its adoption Resolution: AFTER CONSIDERING THE FACTORS SET FORTH IN SECTION 1305 OF ORDINANCE 11000, THE ZONING BOARD GRANTED THE SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS AS PART OF A MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT FOR BRICKELL MAIN STREET, AS LISTED IN ORDINANCE 11000, AS AMENDED, THE, ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, ARTICLE 6, SECTION 607, SD -7 CENTRAL BRICKELL RAPID TRANSIT COMMERCIAL -RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS, TO ALLOW A BAR/LOUNGE OPEN TO THE PUBLIC WITHIN THE SD -7 DISTRICT, AND PER ARTICLE 9, SECTION 917.1.2, VALET PARKING, GENERALLY, TO ALLOW VALET PARKING FOR UP TO FIFTY PERCENT OF EXISTING OFFSTREET PARKING SPACES FOR THE PROPERTIES LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY 900, 901 AND 920 SOUTH MIAMI AVENUE, 900 AND 916-918 SE MIAMI AVENUE ROAD, 10, 20, 26, 36, 50, 60 AND 62-64 SW 9TH STREET, 1, 25, 29, 41, 43, 45, 47, 55, 57, 59, 75 AND 81 SW 10TH STREET, AND 926-928 SE 1ST AVENUE, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS "EXHIBIT B" HEREBY ATTACHED, PUBLIC RECORDS OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA; ZONED SD -7 CENTRAL BRICKELL RAPID TRANSIT COMMERCIAL -RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS. THESE SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS WERE GRANTED PER PLANS ON FILE WITH A TIME LIMITATION OF TWENTY-FOUR MONTHS IN WHICH A BUILDING PERMIT MUST BE OBTAINED, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS BY THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING: 1) PURSUANT TO THE DOWNTOWN NET OFFICE, THE APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT A PARKING PLAN FOR CONSTRUCTION EMPLOYEES WHILE THE NEW BUILDING IS UNDER CONSTRUCTION; SAID PARKING PLAN SHALL BE SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF ANY BUILDING PERMITS, AND 2) PURSUANT TO THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, THE APPLICANT SHALL PROVIDE PLANS FOR PROPOSED SIDEWALK AND SWALE AREA IMPROVEMENTS PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT. Upon being seconded by Mr. Charles J. Flowers, the motion was passed and adopted by the following vote: Mr. George Barket Yes Ms. Gloria M. Basila Yes Mr. Charles J. Flowers Yes Ms. Ileana Hernandez -Acosta No Mr. Osvaldo Moran-Ribeaux Away Mr. Humberto J. Pellon No Mr. Fidel A. Perez No Mr. Juvenal Pina No Mr. Ricardo D. Ruiz Yes Mr. Georges Williams Yes AYE: 5 NAY: 4 ABSTENTIONS: 0 Case No.: 1999-0286 Item Nbr: 1 Miami Zoning Board EXMIT "B" Lot 1, less the West 50 feet thereof, and the South '/z of Lot 2, less the West 50 feet thereof, in Block72, of South. City of Miami, according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book "B" at Page 41, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County; 916-918 S.E. Miami Avenue Lot 18, Block 71 of South, City of Miami according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book "B" at Page 41, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County; 55 S.W. 10 Street The North half ('/z) of Lot 2, less the West 50 feet thereof, and all of Lot 3, less the West 50 feet thereof in Block 72, South, City of Miami, according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book "B" at Page 41, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County; 900 S.E. Miami Avenue Lots 5, 6, 7, 9, 16, all of Lots 17 and 20, Block 71, City of Miami South, Plat Book "B", Page 41; 36 S.W. 9 Street; 50 S.W. 9 Street; 62-64 S.W. 9 Street; 59 S.W. 10 Street; 57 S.W. 10 Street; 29 S.W. 10 Street West 75 feet of Lot 9 and an undivided one-half ('/z) interest in Lot 9 less the West 75 feet thereof, Block 72, South, City of Miami, Plat Book "B" at Page 41; 926 -928 S.E. 1" Avenue Lot 21, in Block 71 of S. of MAP OF MIAMI CO., FLA, a subdivision, according to "the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book B at Page 41 of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida; 25 S.W. 10 Street Lot 8, Block 71, South, City of Miami, according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book "B" at Page 41 of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida; 60 S.W. 9 Street Lot 4, Block 71, South, City of Miami according to the Plat Bok thereof, as recorded in Plat Book B, Page 41, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida 26 S.W. 9 Street The East 26 feet of Lot 15, Block 71 South, City of Miami according to the Plat Bok thereof, as recorded in Plat Book B, Page 41, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida The East 28 feet of the West 125 feet of Lot IS, Block 71 South, City of Miami according to the Plat Bok thereof, as recorded in Plat Book B, Page 41, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida 60— 188 ZONING BOARD ACTION FOR SPECAMLEXCEPT70N I matitg-that the request on Agenda Item be4DFNMD) kGRANTED)yn that the requirements of Article 16�r6 titch). t ArERE SOT) satisfied by relevant evidence in the record of tbehearing. (a), as stated in the City's findings of fact, or (b) as demonstrated by the petitioner, or (c) on the basis of the following: The Zoning Board, in its decision to (GRANT) (DENY) the special exception, shall make written findings that the applicable requirements of this Zoning Ordinance, Section 2305, (HAVE) (HAVE NOT) been met (CIRCLE APPROPRIATE CONDITIONS) 1305.5 Utilities. Due consideration shall be given to utilities required, with particular reference to availability and capacity of systems, location of connections, and potentially adverse appearance or other adverse effects on adjoining and nearby property and the character of the area. 1305.6 Drainage• Due consideration shall be given for drainage, with particular reference to effect on adjoining and nearby properties and on general drainage systems in the area. Where major drainage volumes appear likely and capacity of available systems is found marginal or inadequate, consideration shall be given to possibilities for recharge of groundwater supply on the property, temporary retention with gradual discharge, or other remedial measures. 1305.1 Ingress and Egress. 1305.7 Preservation of Natural Features. Due consideration shall be given to adequacy of ingress and egress to Due consideration shall be given to provision for the preservation of the property, and structure and uses thereon; with particular reference to existing vegetation and geological features whenever possible. , .. automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire and emergency. 1305.8 Control of Potentially Adverse Effects Generally. 1305.2 Offstreet Parking and Loading. In addition to consideration of detailed elements indicated above', as appropriate to the particular class or kind of special permit and the Due consideration shall be given to offstreet parking and loading circumstances of the particular case, due consideration shall be given to facilities as related to adjacent streets, with particular reference to potentially adverse effects generally on adjoining and nearby properties, automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience , internal traffic flow the area, the neighborhood, or the City, of use or occupancy as proposed, and control, arrangement in relation to access in case of fire or other or its location, construction, design, character, scale or manner of emergency, and screening and landscaping. operation. Where such potentially adverse effects are found, consideration shall be given to special remedial measures appropriate in 1305.3 Refine and Service Areas. the particular circumstances of the case, including screening or buffering, landscaping, control of manner or hours of operation, alteration of use of Due consideration shall be given to the location, scale; design, and such space, or such other measures as are required to assure that such screening of refuse and service areas to the manner in which refuse is to Potential adverse effects will be eliminated or minimized to the maximum be stored; and to the manner and timing of refuse collection and deliveries, extent reasonably feasible, and that the use of occupancy will be shipments, or other service activities, as such matters relate to the location compatible and harmonious with other development in the area to a and nature of uses on adjoining properties and to the location and degree which will avoid substantial depryciation of the value of nearby character of adjoining public ways. pjeP 1305.4 Signs and Lighting. "Siv*rature Due consideration shall be given to the number, size, character, location, and orientation of proposed signs, and of proposed lighting for signs and premises, with particular reference to traffic safety, glare, and Age Item J compatibility and harmony with adjoining and nearby property and the ! l a / a . character of the area. Date 900 SOUTH MIAMI AVE SD-7/CENTRAL BRICKELL RAPID TRANSIT COMMERCIAL -RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT, per Article 17 for a parking structure containing 1,040 parking spaces. MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT, per Articles 17 for a phased project as follows: Phase I All retail uses and parking to support use. Phase II Hotel Tower and parking to support use. Phase III Pedestrian Bridge over South Miami Avenue to connect retail areas on the second level. VARIANCE for 9th Street side setback (15 feet required, 5 and 10 feet provided), as per City of Miami Zoning Ordinance 11,000 as amended Article 6, Section 607. VARIANCE for setback of upper levels above 48 feet (10 feet required, 0 provided), as per City of Miami Zoning Ordinance 11,000 as amended Article 6, Section 607. PER City of Miami Zoning Ordinance 11000, this Major Use also encompasses the following, special permits: SPECIAL EXCEPTION as per Article 6, Section 607 to allow Bar/Lounge open to the public within the SD -7 district. SPECIAL EXCEPTION as per Article 9, Section 917.1.2 to allow valet parking up to fifty percent of existing offstreet parking spaces. CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 918.2 for staging and parking during constriction. CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 925.3.8 to allow development/construction/ rental signage. CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT° as per Article 6; Section 607.3:1 to., allow construction trailer. CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 923.4 providing a total of four (4) 12 Y SS loadine berths. including the reduction oft from 12 x 3� to 1Q s 25. CLASS II SPECIAL PERMITS as per Article 6, Section 607.3 for new construction in the SD -7 District. CLASS II SPECIAL PERMITS as per Article`6, Section 607.3 for temporary fence in the SD -7 District. CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT. to waive certain requirements of the City of Miami Parking Guide and Standards. CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT to waive certain requirements of Brickell Promenade Design Development Plan and Urban Guidelines. ice McPhee_, Date oning� Inspector II CITY OF MIAMI OFFICE OF HEARING BOARDS APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTION SECTION 2-653 OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, AS AMENDED, GENERALLY REQUIRES ANY PERSON WHO RECEIVES COMPENSATION, REMUNERATION OR EXPENSES FOR CONDUCTING LOBBYING ACTIVITIES TO REGISTER AS A LOBBYIST WITH THE CITY CLERK, PRIOR TO ENGAGING IN LOBBYING ACTIVITIES BEFORE CITY STAFF, BOARDS, COMMITTEES AND THE CITY COMMISSION. A COPY OF SAID ORDINANCE IS AVAILABLE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK (MIAMI CITY HALL), LOCATED AT 3500 PAN AMERICAN DRIVE, MIAMI, FLORIDA 33133 NOTE: THIS APPLICATION MUST BE TYPEWRITTEN AND SIGNED IN BLACK INK. Within the City generally, or within certain zoning districts, certain structures, uses, and/or occupancies specified in this ordinance are of a nature requiring special and intensive review to determine whether or not they should be permitted in specific locations, and if so, the special limitations, conditions, and safeguards which should be applied as.reasonably necessary promote the general purposes of this Zoning Ordinance and, in particular, to protect adjoining properties and the neighborhood from avoidable potentially adverse effects. It is further intended that the expertise and judgment of the Zoning Board be exercised in making such determinations, in accordance with the rules, considerations and limitations relating to Special Exceptions (see Article 16 of the Zoning ordinance). Formal public notice and hearing is mandatory for Special Exceptions. The Zoning Board shall be solely responsible for determinations on applications for Special Exceptions except when otherwise provided for in the city Code. All applications shall be referred to the Director of the department Planning and Development for his recommendations and the Director shall make any further referrals required by these regulations. I, Brickell Main Street, Ltd., hereby apply to the City of Miami Zoning Board for approval of a Special Exception for the property located at South Miami Avenue between SW and S.E. 9h Street and 10°i Street, folio number See Exhibit "A". Nature of Proposed Use (please be specific): Valet narking and hotel bar as accessory to a retail/hotel center. In support of this application, the following material is submitted. 1. Two original surveys of the property prepared by a State of Florida Registered Land Surveyor within one year from the date of application. f 2. Four copies signed and sealed by a State of Florida Registered Architect or engineer of site plans showing (as required) property boundaries, existing (if any) and proposed structure(s), parking, landscaping, etc.; building elevations and dimensions and computations of lot area and building spacing. 3. Affidavits disclosing ownership of property covered by applications and disclosure of interest from (attached to application). d 4. Certified list of owners of real estate within a 375 -foot radius of the outside boundaries of property covered by the application. 1 5. At least two photographs that show the entire property (land and improvements). f 6.. Recorded warranty deed and ax forms for the most current year available that show the present owner(s) of the property. 7. Other (Specify and attach cover letters explaining why any document you are attaching is pertinent to this application). 8. Fee of $ to apply toward the cost of processing according to Section 62-156 of the Zoning Ordinance: Special Exception (Feesare.inclusive in MUSP fee) - $ 800.00 Special Exception requiring automatic city commission review $2,000.00 Extension of time for special exception - $ 500.00 Public hearing mail notice fees, including cost of handling and -mailing per notice Surcharge equal to applicable fee from item above, not to exceed eight hundred dollars ($800.00) except from agencies of the city; such surcharge to be refunded to the applicant if there is not appeal from a property owner within three hundr d and seventy- rve (375) feet of the subject property. Signature. Name A. Vic Garcia -Toledo Es . Address' ' 200 Sadth Biscayne Blvd. Suite 2500 Miami, FL -33131 Phone/Fax 305-350-2409 / 305-374-7593 Date . STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI -DADS The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day ofNovember,1999, by,Vicky Garcia -Toledo, Esq. who is personally known to me Name: El, zab e • ` ELIZABETH MARCHENA �.;MY COMMISSION CC 815886 Notary Public -State of Florida EXPIRES: April 19, 2003 Commission No.: C C $ /S RA C� e«,aedrnruFienerEmwro"ceAgency, My Commission Expires: /-/1-?W3 . ZONING FACT SHEET Case Number: 1999-0287 10 -Jan -00 Item No: 2 Location: Approx. 900,901,920 S. Miami Ave. and Legal: (Complete legal description on file with the Office of Hearing Boards) Applicant: Brickell Main Street, LTD A. Vicky Garcia -Toledo, Esq. 200 S. Biscayne Blvd. 200 S. Biscayne Blvd. Suite 2500 Suite 2500 Miami, FL 33131 Miami, FL, 33131 App. Ph: (305) 350-2409 Rep. Ph: (305) 350-2409 ext Rep. Fa (_) = ext Zoning: SD -7 Central Brickell Rapid Transit Commercial -Residential Districts Request: Approx. 900, 916-918 SE Miami Ave. Rd., 10,20,26,36,50,60,62-64 SW 9 St., 1,25,29,41,43,45,47,55,57,59,75,81 SW 10 St., and 926-928 SE 1 Ave. Variances as part of a Major Use Special Permit for Brickell Main Street, from Ordinance No. 11000, as amended, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Article 6, Section 607, SD -7 Central Brickell Rapid Transit Commercial -Residential District, to allow on 9 Street side setbacks of 5' and 10' (15' required), and for setback of upper levels above 48 feet, 0' provided (10' required). Continued from Zoning Board Hearing of 12/20/99. Purpose: This will allow a mixed use multistory structure on this site. Recommendations: Planning Department: Approval with conditions Public Works: No comments Plat and Street Committee: N/A Dade County Transportation: No comments Enforcement History, If any C.E.B. Case No: N/A Last Hearing Date: Found: N/A Violation(s) Cited: N/A Ticketing Action: N/A Daily Fine: $0.00 Affidavit Non -Compliance issued on: Warning Letter sent on: Total Fines to Date: $0.00 Lien Recorded on: Comply Order by: CEB Action: ANALYSIS FOR VARIANCES AS A COMPONENT OF A MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT BRICKELL MAINSTREET CASE NO: 1999-0287 The requested Variances are a component of a Major Use Special Permit application for the purpose of allowing a mixed-use development to be located at approximately 900 South Miami Avenue. The Brickell Mainstreet project proposes a mixed-use development with 175,500 sq. ft. of retail and restaurant use and a total of 288 hotel rooms, with 1,040 parking spaces within the Brickell area (see attached legal description, location maps and aerial photographs for exact property boundaries). Pursuant to Ordinance 11000, as amended, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, the subject proposal has been reviewed to permit a structure with the following setbacks: Side street setback along SW 9`h Street Upper level setback required: 15 feet proposed: 5 feet and 10 feet required — above 48 feet: 10 feet proposed: 0 feet In determining the appropriateness of the Variances for the proposed project the following findings have been made: • It is found that the proposed mixed-use development project will benefit the Downtown District by creating new hotel and retail opportunities for visitors, residents and employees of the area. • It is found that the narrow width of subject property is a substantial hardship which limits reasonable use of the property and therefore justifies the requested setback variances. The special conditions attached to the subject property that justify the requested variances are the property's narrow width in conjunction with its Special SD -7 Zoning classification. If the setbacks were to be provided, the project would lose the necessary efficiency in its parking areas due to insufficient space for an efficient layout. If the upper level setbacks were to be provided, the size of the property would cause a final design solution which would put a hardship on reasonable use of the higher portions of the property. • It is found that the 'requested ground level setback variance will also allow the project to comply with the intent of the "Brickell Promenade" Guides and Standards which encourage pedestrian friendly design along SW 1 Wh Street. • It is found that the setback variance is being requested in order to develop a project which can provide an effective parking garage, along with ground level pedestrian activities, and a hotel tower above. It is found that the proposed project offers the most reasonable solutionJo the design problem facing this particular site. Based on these findings, the Department of Planning and Zoning is recommending approval of the requested variances and approval of the requested Development Project with the conditions that the applicant comply with all the conditions of the Development Order for the project. -8, . .. 2 0 0 Miami Zoning Board Resolution: ZB 2000-0258 Monday, January 10, 2000 Ms Ileana Hernandez -Acosta offered the following Resolution and moved its adoption Resolution: AFTER CONSIDERING THE FACTORS SET FORTH IN SECTION 1903.1 OF ORDINANCE 11000, THE ZONING BOARD GRANTED THE VARIANCES AS PART OF A MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT FOR BRICKELL MAIN STREET, AS LISTED IN ORDINANCE 11000, AS AMENDED, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, ARTICLE 6, SECTION 607, SD -7 CENTRAL BRICKELL RAPID TRANSIT COMMERCIAL -RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS, TO ALLOW A BAR/LOUNGE OPEN TO THE PUBLIC WITHIN THE SD -7 DISTRICT, AND PER ARTICLE 9, SECTION 917.1.2, VALET PARKING, GENERALLY, TO ALLOW VALET PARKING FOR UP TO FIFTY PERCENT OF EXISTING OFFSTREET PARKING SPACES FOR THE PROPERTIES LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY 900, 901 AND 920 SOUTH MIAMI AVENUE, 900 AND 916-918 SE MIAMI AVENUE ROAD, 10, 20, 26, 36, 50, 60 AND 62-64 SW 9TH STREET, 1, 25, 29, 41, 43, 45, 47, 55, 57, 59, 75 AND 81 SW 10TH STREET, AND 926-928 SE 1ST AVENUE, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS "EXHIBIT B" HEREBY ATTACHED, PUBLIC RECORDS OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA; ZONED SD -7 CENTRAL BRICKELL RAPID TRANSIT COMMERCIAL -RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS. THESE VARIANCES WERE GRANTED PER PLANS ON FILE WITH A TIME LIMITATION OF TWENTY-FOUR MONTHS IN WHICH A BUILDING PERMIT MUST BE OBTAINED, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITION BY THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING: THAT THE APPLICANT COMPLY WITH ALL THE CONDITIONS OF THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER FOR THE PROJECT. Upon being seconded by Mr. Humberto J. Pellon, the motion was passed and adopted by the following vote: Mr. George Barket Ms. Gloria M. Basila Mr. Charles J. Flowers Ms. Ileana Hernandez -Acosta Mr. Osvaldo Moran-Ribeaux Mr. Humberto J. Pellon Mr. Fidel A. Perez Mr. Juvenal Pina Mr. Ricardo D. Ruiz Mr. Georges Williams Ms. Fernandez: Motion carries 9-0 Yes Yes Yes Yes Away Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes AYE: 9 NAY: 0 ABSTENTIONS: 0 NO VOTES: 0 ABSENTS: 1 Case No.: 1999-0287 Item Nbr: 2 00- 188 Miami Zoning Board .Resolution: ZB 2000-0258 Monday, January 10, 2000 Case 'No.: 2 - 1999-0287 Item Nbr . 011: II - Lot 1, less the West 50 feet thereof, and the South '/2 of Lot 2, less the West 50 feet thereof, in Block72, of South, City of Miami, according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book "B" at Page 41, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County; 916-918 S.E. Miami Avenue Lot 18, Block 71of South, City of Miami according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 'B" at Page 41, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County; 55 S.W. 10 Street The North half ('/2) of Lot 2, less the West 50 feet thereof, and all of Lot 3, less the West 50 feet thereof in Block 72, South, City of Miami, according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book "B" at Page 41, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County; 900 S.E. Miami Avenue Lots 5, 6, 7, 9, 16, all of Lots .17 and 20, Block 71, City of Miami South, Plat Book 'B", Page 41; 36 S.W. 9 Street; 50 S.W. 9 Street; 62-64 S.W. 9 Street; 59 S.W. 10 Street; 57 S.W. 10 Street; 29 S.W. 10 Street West 75 feet of Lot 9 and an undivided one-half ('/) interest in Lot 9 less the West 75 feet thereof, Block 72, South, City of Miami, Plat Book "B" at Page 41; 926 -928 S.E. 1" Avenue Lot 21, in Block 71 of S. of MAP OF MIAMI CO., FLA, a subdivision, according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book B at Page 41 of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida; 25 S.W. 10 Street Lot 8, Block 71, South, City of Miami, according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 'B" at Page 41 of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida; 60 S.W. 9 Street Lot 4, Block 71, South, City of Miami according to the Plat Bok thereof, as recorded in Plat Book B, Page 41, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida 26 S.W. 9 Street The East 26 feet of Lot 15, Block 71 South, City of Miami according to the Plat Bok thereof, as recorded in Plat Book B, Page 41, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida The East 28 feet of the West 125 feet of Lotl5, Block 71 South, City of Miami according to the Plat Bok thereof, as recorded in Plat Book B, Page 41, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida Gu 188 ZONING BOARD ACTION ON PETradlhFOR VARIANCE MOTION: I move that the request on Agenda Item #, 12-- be (DENIED) (GRANTED) in that the requirements of Section 1903.1 (WERE) (WERE NOT) satisfied by (d) Granting the variance requested (WILL) (WILL NOT) relevant evidence in the record of the public hearing. convey the same treatment to the individual owner as to the owner of other lands, buildings, or structures in the (/a) as stated in the City's'finds or fact, or same zoning district 16b as demonstrated by the petitioner, or 1) as stated in the City's findings of fact 2) as demonstrated by the petitioner (c) on the basis of the following: _ 3) as otherwise stated below: The Zoning Board shall make findings that all of the requirements and ' standards of Section 1903.1 (HAVE BEEN).(HAVE NOT BEEN) demonstrated. (e) Granting the variance requested (WILL) (WILL NOT) CHECK ONE (a) Special conditions and circumstances (EXIST) (DO convey the same treatment, any special privilege that is OF EACH ' NOT EXIST) which are peculiar to the land, structure or denied by the zoning ordinance to other lands, buildings STATEMENT building involved and which are not applicable to other. or structures in the same zoning district lands, structures, or buildingsin the same zoning district _ 1) as stated in the City's findings of fact 2) as demonstrated by the petitioner _ 3) as otherwise stated below: (f) If granted the variance (WILL BE) (WELL NOT BE) in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the zoning ordinance, and will not be injurious to the neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare (b) The special conditions and circumstances (DO) (DO 1) as stated in the City's findings of fact NOT) result from the actions of the petitioner _ 2) as demonstrated by the petitioner _ 3) 89 otherwise stated below _ 1) as stated in the City's findings of fact — 2) as demonstrated by the petitioner 3) as otherwise stated below: A (c) Literal interpretation of the provisions of zoningQr,�.`-�--a ordinance (WOULD) (WOULD NOT) deprive the Signature -� applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same zoning district under the terms of the zoning ordinance and work unnecessary and undue hardships on Agenda Item the petitioner 1 ! o OU 1) as stated in the City's findings of fact Date 2) as demonstrated by the petitioner _ 3) as otherwise stated below - 400 0 290 .2. WJ:: t A written pet:�for a variance is submitted to the ciTicer or agent of the cite sped::ec by the city manager demoatu Z=ff all of the following- jai Special conditions and cires,n-c*a^ces exist which are Peculiar so the land. st.:cwre. or building involved and which are not applicable to other lands, structures. ar buiia- Ings in tate same zoning district: (b) The gDecial conditions and Pironnstences do not result from the actions of the pati - ordinances ves the applicant (C) Literal iatec Pr+etatioa of the pa'ovisioas of this zoning depn PP of rights prsmoniy enjoyed by other, properties in the same zoning district under the terms of this zoniv, ordinanm and worsts unnecessary and undue hardship on the Pte+ (d) Granting the variance requested conveys the same went to the individual owner as to the owner of other lands, buUdingt, or structures in tate same zoning district: (e) The variance, if granted, is the minimum variance that makes possible the reasonable use of the land, building, or s and (f) The grant of the variance is in harmony with the general intent and Purpose of this zoning ordinance, and is not injurious to the neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental to tate public welfare. Documents, rets, studies, exbftd s, or other written or graphic materials, if any, to be used by petitioner in support of the petition and in demonstration of any or all of the above requirements shall be submitted with the petition. CITY OF MIAMI OFFICE OF HEARING BOARDS APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE SECTION 2-653 OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, AS AMENDED, GENERALLY REQUIRES ANY PERSON WHO RECEIVES COMPENSATION, REMUNERATION OR EXPENSES FOR CONDUCTING LOBBYING ACTIVITIES TO REGISTER AS A LOBBYIST WITH THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO ENGAGING IN LOBBYING ACTIVITIES BEFORE CITY STAFF, BOARDS, COMMITTEES AND THE CITY COMMISSION. A COPY OF SAID ORDINANCE IS AVAILABLE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK (MIAMI CITY HALL), LOCATED AT 3500 PAN AMERICAN DRIVE, MIAMI, FLORIDA, 33133. ****************************************************************************** NOTE: THIS APPLICATION MUST BE TYPEWRITTEN AND SIGNED IN BLACK INK. A Variance is a relaxation of the terms of the Zoning Ordinance where such action will not be contrary to the public interest and where owing to conditions peculiar to the property and not the result of actions of the applicant, a literal enforcement of this Ordinance would result in unnecessary and undue hardship on the property. As used in the Zoning Ordinance, a Variance is authorized only for height, area, size of structure, dimensions of yards, other open spaces, off-street parking and/or loading requirements (see Article 19 of the Zoning Ordinance). I, Brickell Main Street. Ltd , hereby petition the City of Miami Zoning Board for a Variance from the terms of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, affecting property located between SW SE 9' and 10`h Street on South Miami Avenue, folio number See attached Exhibit "A" as specified below. 1. In support of this application, the following material is submitted. d 2. Two original surveys of the property prepared by a State of Florida Registered Land Surveyor within one year from the date of application. f 3. Four copies -signed and sealed by a State of Florida Registered Architect or Engineer -of site plans showing (as required) property boundaries, existing (if any) and proposed structure(s), parking, landscaping, etc.; building elevations and dimensions and computations of lot area and building spacing. d 4. Affidavits disclosing ownership of property covered by applications and disclosure of interest form (attached to application). d 5. Certified list of owners of real estate within a 375 -foot radius of the outside boundaries of property covered by the application. ,1 6. At least two photographs that show the entire property (land and improvements). 7. Recorded warranty deed and tax forms for the most Current year available that show the present owner(s) of the property. 8. Other (Specify and attach cover letters explaining why any document you are attachina' is pertinent to this application). 9. Fee. of .$39,494.00 to apply toward the cost of processing, according to'Sectio I n 42-156,of the Zoning, Ordinance: CS, PR, R-1, R-2,'(single-family and duplex residential uses) ......................... $250.00 Piers, docks, wharves and the like, for each Variance from the ordinance, per lineal foot................ ................ ! ................ ....................... $45.00 Minimum.................... .......................................... $700.00 All applications for Variances relating to the same structure shall be assessed a single fee to be calculated per square foot of gross floor area of.the proposed structure or addition, based upon the definition of gross floor area found in Section 2502 of Zoning Ordinance, as amended .................. .......... .............. $.10 Minimum ................................................................... $650.00 Application for Variance as a result of a change in approved plans or as a result of a violation notice shall be charged an additional fee, per Variance CS, PP, R -1,-R-2 ..................................................... $250.00 All other residential districts ............ I ............ ;I ........................... $450.00 All nonresidential districts ......................... ......................... $550.00 Extension of time for Variance ................................................. $500.00 Public hearing mail notice fees, including cost of handling and mailing per notice ......................................................................... $3.50 Surcharge equal to applicable fee from items above, not to exceed Eight Hundred Dollars ($800.00), except from agencies of the City; such surcharge to be refunded to ihe,applicant if there is no appeal from aproperry owner within three hundred and seventy-five (375) feet of the subject property 10. The Variance request is for relief from the provisions of Section 607.8 of the City of Miami Zoning Ordinance as follows: The subject property is located on 10' Street which is designated as Bricke . 11 Promenade by the City of Miami. As such, the City has established - ides and standards which requires the creation of spacious public promenades as a pedestrian pathway from Brickell Avenue to 1".Avenue. ' In order to comply with the intent of the Brickell Promenade design criteria, the project is placing a greater on 101 Street which requires the movement of the entire project to the North. This has -created the need for this particular variance as to the setback on 9' Street.. The narrowness of the property -also requires the need for the variance of setback for upper levels above 48 feet. 2 11. In support of the application, the applicant is prepared to offer the following evidence, on the point enumerated at Section 1903 of the City of Miami Zoning Ordinance. Note: This application cannot be accepted for Zoning Board action unless all of the following six items are completed. (a) Special conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the land, structure, or building involved and which are not applicable to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same zoning district in that: (list evidence to be produced and use additional sheets, if necessary.) The special conditions discussed above, were not the result of any action on the part of the petitioner; but an effort on the part of the petitioner to comply with the requirements of the Brickell Promenade standards as set forth by the City of Miami. f (b) The special conditions and circumstances do not result from the actions of the petitioner in that: A literal interpretation of 607.8 would preclude the applicant from consistency with the requirements of the City of Miami for Brickell Promenade and therefore place the applicant in an unnecessary and undue hardship position. (c) Literal interpretation of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same zoning district under the terms of the Zoning Ordinance and would work unnecessary and undue hardships on the petitioner in that: Granting of such a variance will not confer any special privilege that is denied by the Zoning Ordinance, since in fact the Zoning Ordinance emphasizes the need for the pedestrian pathway as well as the fulfillment of all requirements . All properties located on 10`x' Street have the same or similar requirements of the Brickell Promenade Guides and Standards. d (d) Granting the Variance requested will not confer on the petitioner that special privilege that is denied by the Zoning Ordinance to other lands, buildings, or structures in the same zoning district in that: Granting of such a variance will not confer any special privilege that is denied by the Zoning Ordinance, since in fact the Zoning Ordinance emphasizes the need for the pedestrian pathway as well as the fulfillment of all requirements . All properties located on 10`t` Street have the same or similar requirements of the Brickell.Promenade Guides and Standards f (e) The Variance, if granted, is the minimum Variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the land, building or structure in that: The variance, if granted, is a minimum variance that would allow the reasonable use of the land and permit a design of the project consistent with the Brickell Promenade Guides and Standards as well as the requirements of pedestrian pathways in order to be consistent with the City of Miami's Downtown Master Plan in creating a friendly pedestrian ambiance at the street level and at the same time creating a spacious corridor between the Metrorail and the Metromover d M The grant of the Variance will be in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance, and will not be injurious to the neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare. The variance, if granted, will allow the harmony that is envisioned by the different planning documents adopted by the City of Miami in order to improve the quality of life in the neighborhood 3 % T and the varinace will not create any inconsistencies with the general intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance. Note: Please note that this variance is being submitted as part of a Major Use Special Permit for the BrickelI Main Street Project. Signature Name A. Vicky Ga ia- oledo Esq. Address 200 South Aiscavne Blvd. Suite 2500 Miami, FL 33131 Phone/Fax 305-350-2409 / 305-374-7593 Date 1 4 j 1372843M 11JOU►M 0=0 FUCK AND sJM_ To CXTT OF XXAXI IO►Y Is, 1988 STATE OF FLORIDA) COUNTY OF DADE ) THEN PERSONALLY APPLARED BEFORE ME, an. officer duly authorized to administer oaths and receive acknowledgements within within the State of Florida JAY W. LOTSPEICZ and BETH P. IMSPZICR. well known to re," who did execute the foregoinq Warranty Deed and did ackncwledge said execution as their tree act and deed before ne. WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICSAL SEAL this 18th day of May, 1988 at Dade County, Florida. �iLn/t.0 01 N: NO ARY rUBLIC, ASE or. RIDA AT LARd L�.1 My Commission Expiree s . �! WCAM POW.( Stale of 94"Aa `.s''' •• U i 1 114,, CumaKvos E.p;,e+ tpJ 23.19V QIi;,.� STATE OF FLORIDA) COUNTY OF DAVE ) THEN PERSONALLY APPEARED BEFORE ME, an officer duly authorized to administer oaths and receive acknowledgements within the State. of Florida SD1a►RD,H. ?Ea and BML X AH= FDX, Well known to mi-, who did execute the foregoing Warranty Deed and did acknowledge said execution as their Pre* act and deed store as. WITNESS MY MOD AND OFFICIAL SEAL this 18th day of'�ieryl j�;888 at Dade County, Florida. . NaW foSla..3tslc o' Far is .'r 1 1'% - /4 IL -m-60 law -:w.. ••• •••7 NOTAR PUBLIC, ST S, O I ...,« FLORIDA AT LARGE I- ij�: oil �Sy Commission Expires: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND 7-cTNESS., j CIT A /,.- This Instm-mOnt Accegte(1 Pursuant to Resolution No. Passed and Adopted APPROVED AS-MO-RLSCRIMION: DIRE RLIC WORKS That Forn V L a`.i is Prepared By: Department of Law City of Miami, Florida ••cca■tto w 01 11M `LCb;nm sour m wr cewn..IGM W-140 R1CRARD P. DE1NEti21 u:.a cuawlt count O LOT S Pe ICM i C R O M I O AkTWX'*0 0'or M 040'"o,• M S+�M Mvra {pQD SXT7 4epvie 1�13iS 02)7 61 U- ��� n moer.tanoener esetpt as RWM -cd r -&W n& by ASSIGNEE aid Shan not be 31uyed. medtsed. tmesdad. lionised_ teemed. or any nam of andnian tbertof be aainsd wubout the prior approvtl of ASSIGNEE. 3. That these we so defada rev eusung tmda nay of the lawn. It soy. and their exists m sate of fwu vsbub. with the si"+r p of ttotirs ar bpw of time or both. would oennitme a detach under say of the Leges mad that . ASSIGNOR will fulfill or pessorat each and emy ooudulon sad eaves= of est of the Ina by lessor W be Adat ed � or pa!onmd. std dive prompt nice to ASSIGNEE of aey wit of default by ASSIGNOR ender any of tit: Leasea received by ASSIGNOR together wilt a rmeplee wff of 20Y sold intim. ASSIGNOR shill. a due sole co" and expeass of ASSIGNOR. rafarae. shod of tesminsion of any Leau. the pafmrmnee or oMaysre of cam and eery mvmau w d eoodirion of an w h ins by uhe kaws) to be palormed at observed. S. Tine ASSIGNOR bar' not =Hacsed and dmU enc eaUaa. of ate p vmmt of. not wda nay of dr Lean mora dw,o a month in advattoe: EXCErr inch admu zatkafoes ahlcb ire in tee ordinary odaae of biseeri: ` S. That ASSIGNOR shall mc, wbtnnt thepriorwritaniaoamt of ASSWNM ema imoaoY hAm b=a aplao; all or soy pan of the PREMISES and shill exeaau aid ddhCf a the,tegor>a of ASSIGNEE an. saeb fisari atiaraira Md assi�s as ASSIGNEE shalt ham time to rigir MOM; or dein tie sivy. ' 6. The panics further a;rw ad follows A. Thm Au*namu a sblaim and is ggmiSY mtmtdmdy. Noavrdneandmstlae fin potgs, scut tsatifted by the ASSIGNEF. in mmtinyq d= a ddadt Its oatuaed under the terms sea, exnin"= a the xam a Awrimra or any ether —rumen ios oomiaaaddaioml sops" (w the NOTES. ASSIGNOR my fact im' coliaet. nd wry the rerm income and profits nom from dc' PRF�ifISB. e. !n rise t vmt of amp defaoi by the Nf7iES err AfORTGAGE.,or any wlac itatru>mm aomtitviastl0.; ion»1 secarisy for ftKOTFS. ASSIGNEE nay, a fu option. receive and iodate au oto tnso. &mom aid prdta in dov miry beenow rias. hom sub PRF11tM sod under say and all Isis of ad or any pet of ft "EMM ASSIGNEEshW tbertorher aomimto m rsoeirs sed *Aman orb tmo.wme msail paofrsf. is loos s' each lefaslt er d hwm shaft exist. td dorm= use pendent 3, of nay ' -1, sine porsdists. std If acie as ddesoa77. dines lay tdeapioapriod- C. ASSIGNOR bereby appobaa ASSIGNEE is care ad 2sw[ol.aaoM7 *rim fqa pore► d tab "floo=d witb power for ASSIGNM in its ova aims and to pari, w i• *c save and apaoty of ASWNOR W= ddmk nidus tbt NO Iii ere AI«�l� n modified m demml. rnika. ssoeise. ad fi+e'tamglar atigdnab lar eery d all ►rano, aaome sod pwfua. weru p from the PREMISES, and in ASSIGNEE'S Qist M m fBra".. elatm ac aft.". putts teoes o: p osaftP aid trite myseslaas of nay claim. sft a a b o}ro epee or a ft mme d ISSIONOR or aheriraa whir h ASSIONEE mtey des neoaary «tiesltabls arch to t0if6n and etdetas ihspoysaw d ds tirots: .. Javow and MOs. Leman of the PMUM nae W tby es,pandy amorind -9 dtiaeed w pay nay ter/ a0 atemimas rine A59GNOR pawaot to the Leak. m ASSIGM w writ eo eee as ASiIQNEE try dedFa�o iter veism ; dtdnaad to said ts+eiasd by earls Lina aft ale otprimidy ttdieved of anY'=d AU dmy, mbili y. or ot+lipd m m' " ASSIGNOR in rape% of dl ptrymeos ao made: D. ASSIGNEE is biruby vested Whb fun power a we all mmoes. less) sad aqusaw doused by is aoeas7 or proper to adores this Aaipmmt and w *Alia do mea. iaaunt. ad profs waptsa idu!uades. , tba bila of ASSIGIEE or in do*= so ear upas 09 PROMES. or,aoy pats ib isof, ad tib pnaad on of an or any ants of ds PREMISF3 m/cdw wJ* AU p>mral pews). ffss:eia. a+o®ms, bob. mciards PqM and ocaoaao of ASSIGNOR nisil p Otot0. and m utbde the ASSIGNG'J>~ its spares or sr VJM. vb* iest*NIs. , ASSx)mR hereby scam iva poses and a dwwkt ,m ASSIGNEE a aaristi all>}dQ. prinisaw6 and wism, haeiq o pnmad a sal► and an tinea Iar, wah fan peva 0 use rod up ply all of tie mea aid adw coma Ism aRistoe a o eheptayaemt of ttw oma d mtslas sad apatstb w t e i71E3fM and d any wlebaadns r fa<AtttGtfOlt _ m A=14EF— mdadms bin art Wind to the payou i Of eras. WMW . mrmaarra prrmbtap� dteoap ileums. Ole ntssaatik toaaa of mm=Wbs& mpdrft mbdffiep. d tatoe>ss nisi net: ria Psi Oe of tuldas see taerahia. IssamiY>Doesy'a Anes bteertal s osststbs enrLb ere aheasem of Itis Alpaeate.' kch dit appdiate saes. and nlirH in, apply ria sea so the pates of padpd and,bdormt pay lama MR from AMGM= to ASSIGNEE ere me mOM and as MORTGAGE d in sow varier s ASSIONFE OW brmias. ASSIGNEE ftU bo cedar m obiia+ooe m =Wcks or peeseeme aq of Ifst:isms err ch t nwipead to i issssde r ar to pp. I or laity an my of rho a4liprioa of tip lasso► uadtr say of tie leen and does tea sssss say of the labllbdaisa aeraueeasa t>m or s « psvitts ass of ma enema® sad spencer► d A39dNOR y aha Leser. ASS1f�R beJObp spurs m adetsiiy ASSiONF1: tad to hats b;iemebea lion ars 1>ab�y.ltts. «datslapR. tadrtdios trRhOtt &*El e. aWrsdrb mwrws Ase which my or alms he Monod by it odor tis lass or by tease of 1W A,ftin en. tad fiom sty and rA t.Itlm and deaa+dt admewt wigs mw b naent 1 ap®t A=KUby snags of nay of pd obi+yei®ar aedoukiw as in pea s puefetm or dbsiatpr soy dtie tame. msesOM or OOMOn u n nsasai In my of rise Lmw& & a f0dw Asda nnid that this As4m= nia0 as apses to pita ra111011 y far de metol. e:ee. mooap u nc or tttW of the "MISS. « pia *emof. upon ASSKNIM tar than ft operas to moloe ASSIGNEE Ibble for Ore pabam:r of ear of the ►atm std raadpioas of my of rio Lases. or far my arae► of rite PREMLSFS b7 tit sustaeeroda nay o/the tensa as nay atter piety. or t«eery tiwtptws a rid -cam of t& PREMISES or for cry nepl*= in nbe aompe_w. upkeep• repair or eoatd of ttte PREMISES real ieti in a I rAn e6l tlneWfM ANDIOM ANY COX= OF CONDUCT. COURSE OF DPAI,YG, SrATbWq$.(fYffrn= VPJ1t0AL OR WRJTTlJ11. LOAW4 APOOM15. CONrkACY5. DnCL lS. AYmNOt A 1S QE ANY UC' AND/OR AMM OF UrWWANY PARTY lilADOL swum vuwr.._'OR Arrim TJDti R1!lOsl OF TID.S DOC1AOW., THM WATVYi Arna1:S.Cif TW ZVlr1TT AKr OTMM ]!Al[ia8 OWSTTfUM JOK OR nW D ANY UTIGAIM. THE PROVE= Q A'116A1,1 l 11:11 P]dsO FoRR Als1Gm �TEYDW(i C3R3 u t. TO Asopm TT n 1 Y AGR=TEAT NO TARTY OR ENTTIY NASFJPR RES NM TART Tilt WAMM WV.L NOT 11L VGVKW. Q. VFMJE ARS JLMMCTM . AT * EX 1N DADL C LW".,i1 DRMA. PDH AM, AFFnWAT1VE OR DHWVH,IEGAL.PROCEEDVJW JI t Cmwq .' gw-TYdL1i.Tm Docub a AND= ANY OTHM DOCUNgM SMW BY TM ASSMOK IN FAV4M RTt FAVOR OF ARRlIfAYlM JN W1TNEW WHFREOF. the aid ASSIGNOR bas owed fhb asaremem to be aped std soled as of rh dme rzm rbore ttripm. Sipsed. soul. sad ddivw ASSIGNOR:r preoce of: fTnVAWI EXE=YE CENTM INC. . f s \ 430 Soodl 1Nbmri Atrraoe Mitmt. FL 33130 @T[r. 1 ysti...att� Z� p►tIIesON WTWALDL PREMENT NECAVUM ASSzcN>;E: N „tis,eaataalca_ay�. OCEAN 11AN1C a ansbaokinP Tri N.W. aZ ArEM:E MrwJdlRft�?ls� l /% , vWR AaMTV ATTlSi': `• %Y45 STATE OF FLORIDA } . (ss.: COUNTY Of DADS } MM FORWOJNG INSTRUMENT wo admosrida 4 beton me Ibis of Fobnwy. 1997...; by EUMON FITTWALDL as Prmides of FrrnPAI IN E7IEMMVE C SNfJ:R. INC., a Reefda Mp r iM a bctWf of dw corporation. He pmftmd hit Flalb Drlvds ft=w as Jdmdbmim My Commiw= Eapiras: Q.- �Naft Wider. NetuY POW= Store of Florida , - _ STATE OF FLORIDA Is�pv.rreaotsCGaIIRIU a�se�Aa: tia0 COUNTY OF RADE } THE iNG INSIRUMlW was admvwkdPod Rrefaea ax tbis ar aw of BYbrraly. l9R/f,by 171 � � sadMARIBZ AUNDULBY.as ViwPreridesaadAaafa SaMUM. noppQhdy. af OCEAN BAW4 a arae baehbM iehall o! m wopoesfar Tlarg+ ass p moodly taorret a or e. My Commission FsphW. ' C lid& Val. Notary Pabi Valle. w Un of Florida yai IMAYAUM Al ,Dmoppcov "q WVA �►a�art amawm.nr m,uarcomr 110 KIC I TA5. 8M i— or WM tx dcggt to my kww� lx==, =V*ee. or umW ,,4.4 my am Mdmgm by qw X%M?,M which we Uattahtfa. 0 vIOLMICS GLIS= mdkt bdccL[ law. 2JD = ma of my of or daum. at any otha scu th3c we to urvioultim for dw pwpm of pu*cmg die A&VGNWs ==by j==. E ASSWNEE may rdeaae saeoritdea or uk am" ==by - may rd -W my poly rumvily or wconduffy Itahk for my Whtudmu acmd b -by. my V= Caculb=L MwWab. or b"ma Wit tHpCSs to -&mddmd--dvoyapply nay aha ommy6nvfwbddbyAS=?tEE*todwmkf, -1 Qflwtisdebtcd=; araban prejudice to &py of is ngks hams I F. ASSIGNEE my, as in apdoo. aubma it *A M be abLipccd to do w. pafoem my I=w COMOM for Md 00 bobdf Of ft ASSIGNOR ad any mn"M C90OW ka so doing "I be dMquble wi& imadt to dw ASSIGNOR Md added to the ioddMfiOwed hmvby. G. Wai%w of or amain bythe AZIGMJs-ydd=k.bydw AS3MMR.9-r-fauns afthe ASSIGAQM 0 inset upw stria perbemmes by dw AIMNOR of aW H. TbRrights and r9mwfiMofASS===dffdds---4MC=duJwand w;mtwU= of. but ass in aadftm to. =y celmrad ar 'm ASSIGNEE dM =64 w der ft MYM The MM=AGE ry c7cotber' amain swjr* fat de Mrs. Ulm arlo oqt*"y., I. If nay terra of" Andgamm or "Icedonthneal to my pts of tbaU. to =Y ctimt. be invalid or %anclosmable- the acradw of Ob AwWomt. oF " aWkuft of m* me to pmme am of this Asapantol SW he valid and pud—bk so ft &Hw a= I inw. J. Mcon-w. W AUW=M. MM by AMP NIM is nacesuary for she ukbg o(scl) action. nosh amm dmD not bB am anan* sibbML K. All.notion to be Sbat pwmat w dis Anipmam dAU ba adnd— if =WM p=up i - - 4 mad or regimerad cruil.mcumnClipt wQoeaoed, &oft bu*wftd=s%w awnian 41be pwuesbiim or tomb otber -MrM u a pony a" zmqma is wrMw ASSU;NM- ffMALAX EMWMVE CEJ 7=4 IM.. a flmdr oaspwa " ch 0003W ffnVAIJDL l%ealdsat 90 5006 A9Md Avaw Mbw. PL 33un ftff L YMmvM& Fjw M ZrMd Awa. Salle 150 MbinL r=W 33138 ASSSGPIM- OCZAN SAM 780 M.W. 42 AVENUE MbEd. YL 3M26 Any dm period provided to the sming of my AGH aroomma upon do due amb ratios is in die Md. I- The t= 'AMGNM' ad 'ASSrjNW duC be aa0aetroad to kcba& the hob. pav0oast cmd. . axonswa. Md - &mwf. The sodw w nm*a umd in do AwiSmamt ma =W at a adimma ==a* =aAnUappty wfth ths mon off= wboiba to pWl=ars ofwwm=rw*rAnnbWovpodw. aaafmte aredw farm. and d3c aqSWw sbaU Wzqnm — ds phML M. Ibis AssWww nq M be amend I =adbW.drchsqpd. jorshag airy wdva ptwtrhdoa Im be dfccd-. csapc ady by = be0ees In wdft m &Wwd by die Wq #when cohnonow a(my witiva awcadaxot. -4-mv or 0 is gowbL N. Wotb=g bwWs commiaW io the asmy. ASSIGNOR tcpnmm that :hem wo no here cwTwdy 0 sun= nor am any M amunnowd 06 AM== AM AMGPM DZOM=T.AGIM THAT TWY WAIVE ALL OMM w R=y ad ca =am aff =a SrAlzmvm "wc rawa To aaaastaunaTO THE SUMM or TM DOCUIUM. T. AM== MD AM== MEMY AMWINGLIftVML!NTAMY AM M'MI.MMMY WAIVE WE IUGW gffgMMff ARAY HAVE VE TO Aatsm tAl1H acsp= TO MY MWATKIK BMW =RUM Ca AM= = Or. UMM CIS OW CCW=XW *=I= DOCEOMM, MWM MY A=nZWM CONIEWATED TO BE EMCUM IN CCNnPOCMM t?f - 7 STATE Of nOtIOA UNIF')RM COMMERCIAL CODE FINAMCM STATEUMT FORM UCC -1 (REV.13) 841h FM 1. Drier (L" MMW4 Am ef as kdb") Ia. ow of or FMWALM zxsc7nm czwmmINC., a Awf& ju tam* A"W" ac. cley. Shue Id. zip cc& "0 39vo Afar. Amar MWAIL PAWW& 33130 2. AdimmW Ddm or Trak Mr� OLM K=W Fast W bd%vv$u6 2a. Dae of Sim or FM V: VI X MMmq A"m Sc. car. S.. id. 25P Cana p I SowW AM daff Now l(ts Jobvidod) 0CLQV4 BANK L MWW AWnW J6. car. saw x Z?v cow 790 W.W. 4bd Aia Kam. Florida '4. AnigM ofSfivwW Pel dM Now AM V An bmliw~ 4L Mmftg AdAM Y. cky. Sm 1c. Zip CM. S. Mit Fbnzkg WAamet sera- do I w- PmEly lIffifts M-*— of ma ptaPuy m sbie6 laoad ad woar of nand wim wood. It nom mm 6 nwhuL awb atdkbwW OuglS RIDER ATTACHED AND MADE A PART HEREOF - 4 one 4* v ="w hwmo stamons m 4" ftm adamm" " "me& cawwmo ft -W I- is s own& a got* mwm m wman& Q atrary at a- 0 a mm" ieraa w &"dw pmm&mm %a it en bmaM me »r Or ~0 bmift AMON a as ME& am as PUN"@ of on MV" .chlor 630&d abm a w1wh a f 7ba 3PLW to Lim of FdW$ Ofta 13 at w mIM to t4 ba hpW. Dawd MW ar telae t=-1 Me =new 13 mood aftwa d -w of -- Mae*- - —r— aoeseia 4 ts ddmw. lop gftpwmmwmavulw 4001 Oiertal UUMM PMWAM)L Me PALIAM Of RPWA= wowanm corn& bit J.. Stpm&%W d SmomW Plaft w V Am"mL by @AIM ZL am" Cdr NL Dw c LL T. Orm mda va") Addlmf IN IM. 42, civ. data. zip KlwK rocitU6 SUM STANWD FORM - FORM U=l t?f - 7 EXHIW'A' RIDER TO FINANCING STATRIMENT (Foran UCC.1). This Fnandng Ststenend covers the f kMV.lypes aid itmrti4 Of PropWf At propony nghtS of any lud a IMMIew, wh/flr N real persooai rnm . or other""O. and fs wh*OW tsr9Bcr rrbtegtbia, encumbered by Inst osrtaln nnetpape of aaen doM hlre erlr h _ jMf'tlrs Debtor. as ft -bon bersirabove. in favor d the 5acrtrad Party, s rdwdb d tr�esraboera.' n0 �eiasrapanrg tlef ce Mh parsM ef rest orate sib+ate in DARE COUNTY. Fbrlft and lepelly described at Lott 4 acrd A and the WON 50 fast of LOa41. 2 sad 3 In Bled[ J2 SOUTN, CITY OF MlAlft, or aocdb* to feta Fla tdtenrof. as aeeordad to Pkt Dobe 'B' at Peps 41. of the PWWIC RNMU Of Dads County, Fbdda. AM - Late 22.23 and 24. QftO 71. SWK CRY.OF.IKAW, saoreIf to eft Phe twleef, e recorded in Plat Boole 13 at Paps 41 of the Publk tRaearlde of Dade Couslp. Flarlda ' LESS ffie Esse five (M fart of said Let 24 Ow.08 edrnnl on of a okwd cures Censors b O» Nove ueR N vft a ndke of trseelyAre ( :a1! and tertprmea teed ar twrdraM M f0a North of sed p0aw vft #is et. 10th u4st and a" (30) fad tAfest of and PMON vift tete eesisamfe of tiouSf lfaafl Asenw rrrkf*v to tfowew Tho ab net Of We coveling crab real property. "'all tumam 4anielb s fbaurve; goods, aqutpnrertt and imerrtary of Debtor, topathar tMOt any proceeds 11fErsOf and ariy atplsoenrsrYs thssof, wtricft sin am or Bray rruew ter be toraled and Shale on b popr+ttr OetgEe+d in seed rrertpe td ad structures and irpprovernenb now arlfererser on said Jend ad fere 6rmiaras'attar leg lNarefo, aro Otip or in any eery partaet and 1M renes, bouss, ond.puft ##101=4oww a, , aM the Ost i a,, 49 son. /rbrrrtt and ea come and dwrnnda whetsoaver, as waf in tar rte in ipdty. of ft Debtor, in and to tfr_Sam and , every pR W4 peresf useeo(, and aft a4 gee and Neabtc tbdrer, ra6Aore, Ireelert. at Oeidefoning egwpnwe. waftstry. boiler& rarpft els vators and a+otors. both tuba. dit wear,efoats. neater bdrs Pon. Aauead and othw &.nbirg sed heating tbmoea, nfartdls , floverok planta and he' belie, Vd d=' suaarre, arlaedaoors venetian b3rods storm shutfas and awiript; arvrrad by De01ar, rbidf aA npr.or_iRry treroder Pertain to or bs Liao arfh. e crdo add pramiea, WAM # ouph 6* be diwdfb W dit 49* and the +otard hudonos pcW cove" SW pemiass. 9opefs r dit crew ord a1 so4sntion and IrtgaoaitNn4 11101 , ad any and all rtphts llnrsunder, end any and at Vila bl,wbmptlon Prwklb by tafd morg0pa . Eor SsUft l hsreusdsr, crew monies in any crease acccur is ssbkbfrahw or aarusd pawn b bald. rfiorfpspa MW a>ovaw or other thing; of vshfe aoquha0 rkl+ or peed fbr by ary fa!<fra or fiatfreraefranea� pwff � fo said morfpge; and any darrsyes a.rmded pwxmt to eondlM-baro or eninenf•danae`piOeeeQinp. e .ncfnre.nad by acid nrprtgape- rsoeraa.a.;an� HARM 9" Piz f t •r t "t I {9 � LL I V.� µ•yea ,r ... L � .r = ,,,,,.� fi � �-'a4 • . �.� • i I r tl'� r<v> -.6 : '. J ? - _ -ts �... . �• v rt Y y�y�+ �'� .n.A?�i�i, ! 1 i°HY. '`c tidy= .+r= �` �y_�.y.yii:_ r. ..•4-t. -a. �.�: J3 y{I ,.I :il. Ali) `77 H8 "15 Ari 10 20 eE' 95A rc 703 t•� LOCATION: 950 SOUTH MIAMI AVENUE, MIAMI, FLORIDA COVENANT TO RUN WITH THE LAND JPHIS COVENANT, made and entered into this day or +,. A.D., 1977, by and between 950 SOUTH MIAMI ASSOCIATES LIMITED, (A Florida Limited Partnership), hereinafter called OWNER, and THE CITY OF MIAMI, a municipal corporation of, the State of Florida, in the Count••: =f Dade, he CITY; and relrafter c311ei WHEREAS, 950 SOUTH AIAMI ASSOCI:.TFZ L_T ;ITED, (A F_cr1•.ja Limited Partnership), is the fee o::mer of Lot- 22, ?3 and fp, Block 71 South, City of ';iamt, _ccordinr to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book E, at r_ce ?1, of thr °lbl:c 3e:or3c of Dade County, Florida, A/K/A 950 'pst^ Florida, hereinafter called ?RE' -;?S-:., WHEREAS, CITY, rursuant to Chute:• 5J,;7c:.^_'Li•': i'� D•• tr". Code of The City of Miami, Florida, ns zmen•lc•J b: t^-:rc :: No. 7990, No. 5255 and No. 8352 r•c* -trt:•e: that concrete sidewalk and/or curb and rutter• s11a11 3t ilio :;.•1.� exp•:::-�• of OWNER Le constructed, reconstruct -!d •• r �r i s c.i .,zt lr r•�:is a,ijaeent to private rrorerte that :s "!nr' . •rr rip c.i :,,r.: int building permits 's_ae3 br C£_'v: u WHEHt:AS, Lire "-!% "i ratter are nct in proper alignment With the Bas.- `mull -dine Line ii' -'cent t= Lot Line of PP.EXISES (Lot _-%), belnt, l"c?ted 5 feet Easteri:- therefrom and parallel therewith: ant!! WHEREAS, OWNER askr zc be r?liavr8 _. th^ ehl's-�t'r.: a' •^' time to relocate the sldcwalk, Garb and r,;tter It the &' ns Put' Line adjacent to the East L_: .!n_ ,f =9 :cc r,-- '.1 r :t) , ,h consideration of the f 1_ezrC1-:y,ao c, Cura � _ :, to construct the nforesai= imprc•rements at PRE'-;i:;ESat the sale cost and expense of OWNEz. NOW, THZRE ORE, In conside-atien of the PF F':T_ F:S here!r. Z.2 - out, OWNER hereby cc Tenants and agrees '.11th CITY to de!iclish the existing sidewalk, c:rb and gutter, ._�:•rirp t:tr. ensuing deb:l- and constructing ne. concrete side- alk, curb and +:utter it t1,;` Base Building Lire 2d*zzen- tr• tte East Lo,, I.lne of PRE'71SE (lot 24) upon thirty (30) days written :otic.? _r•or.. tic Directs- of the Department of Public :forks of The City cf ''ians, =lor':,, addressed to the OK':ER at % Oeorre D. !cid, E:: , :alto 606, 66 West Flagler Street, 741a^i, Florida ;3130. It 1s expressl; agrc---ed that this obl_ratiur: shall be bindln. upon. OWNER and also heirs, successors In interest or assl:ns of OWNER., and shalt be a condition implied in an conveyance or other instrummt affecting the title to the aforesa!1 r^_asps cr any portion thereof.. In the eve..^.t that 0FNF:;R shall fail to cauze the aforementienet improvements to be constructed at LDF•4ISF:' as hereinabove provided, within thirty (30) days after the mailing of the written notice from the Director of the Department of F-ubl'c Vorks of The City of Miami, Florida, then the.City.'4anager of The City of :!lama, Florida, shall act as agent of O'WNER of any lot or parcel of land described in the written notice, which agency is hereby specifi- cally created, and said City Manager shall cause the aforementioned improvements to be constructed at the exrense of OL14FR and the amount of such construction cost shall be declared and established as a lien on the property of such defaultlnF 04'N'.R and enforced as any lien for materlals furnished and work and labor done, Drovided under the Statutes of the State of Florida. t �0 V / - 1 i� 9591 704 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the OWNER. has caused these presents to be executed and signed In his name the day and yea- first above set forth. Sigried, Sealed and Delivered In the Presence of: ' WItnelss� ltiiess STATE OF FLORIDA ) � COU`!TY OF DADS ) I HEREBY CER:'IFY t .st on :hls is t•erZonaliv Znreare.; bef-z: e me, an officer duly autho 1=ed to ar!n'.niste:• a_ths in:'. _;:ke acknowledgeaents, Dereral Partner of the 950 SOUTH RIAMI ASSMIATES ,.(A Florida Limited FartnershYr), to me well known to be the persons described 1:: and whc exe_�te= the foregoing instrument and acrnoxledped before me _hat thew ` executed the sa=e freely and voluntar' ly for the c,ir-os_c thereln I ex essed. WITNESS my hin:i a:. "iii- sr l -%t.:ia�` .:cua* o:' ::ade j and State of Florida,_': 2y ,.c... y.�-, ,977, . .M{CtA•. ttas�. d: , r .gyp \/ �L�f (c � C. � �� �� .<��iC •� � ''t My Co=Issicn Exr!res: ry P:G:1C, .t+r.: .7' _Cr:ia 3L merge PR as ro =c ': �-,11 AP 3 AttorreV APPR9YE �1 wc,/••,? Director, Deea:•tme nt o.0s mum no :his instrument Prepared By K am plpR. PJCHtRDP.E,iJ.NXM De?artment of Lair: "a 0X=T Gw[r City •c: ia:rl, 'c'lorida _ 2 .. .. COUP THOUSE 70WER „ GATE LOC -►r l Oa 16360"0906 W • p p ♦ as 7•V nccn '.04kC :.»e423 1994 MAY 11 16:0LI THIS INDENTUM Made this 44"1 day of May, A.D., 1994, Between V.T.R. REALTY, INC a FlerWa Co. potation (Federal ID Na. OS -0384110), of the County of Dade. in the State of Florida. Parry o( the fm part, whose post oMce addren is *&40= •b,&,te, }(w .0O t�l.�.;c►,a..� . rK ->YA and, l'impAw1 EXECUTIVE CENTmt. INC, ) a Florida eorpmadon. of the County of Dade. State of Florida, whose post office address is t }•=. ` ; t. , r n . • (l ... (, - ht . •� Parry of the second part. �- L wd bmim.1be w.ws T m testy sal 'land Fortf W" revue A nrAw sad p..a ►.+n. bpw Ktww•ea,aw.. ane aedM. of rd&*d4w 4 and an � A" ate. at mrppealea�� Mrfn1 � aaa,aY M arM. err R�alR. 1 WITNESSEM That the acid Party of the tint part. for and in ccmaideratiul of the sum of Ten Donuts (SIO.00) in hand paid by the said Parhr of the second part, the receipt whermof is hereby acknowkdged, have granted. bargained. and sold to the staid Party of the second part. their. heirs end assigns forever, the follwing described land, situate. and being in the County of Dade State of Florida, to wit: The Went SO feet of Lots 1.2 and 3, in Bled 72. SOUTH CITY OF ML4MI. according to the Plat there as recorded in Plat Book 'W. at Pate 41, of the Public Recaeds of Dade County, Florida Folio # 01-0=4)20-1020 E*'XSrF0EE ti.Z2u(:.u' SWIX 3.8W.O0 ABJECT TO: WKY kWlk, CLERK DADE (OWTt, Ft 1. Conditions. - c h ictians. limitations and easements of record. if any. 2. Taxes and maeewwa a for the yew 1994 and thereafter. And the said Party of the first part does hereby fully warrant the title to said land. and will defend the sate against the lawful claim of all persons whaQlsvcver. 1N WITNESS WHERBOF, The amid Party of the first part 1128 hereunto set his band and corporate seal the day and year first above written. Y.T.R. REALTY. INC. STATIC OF FIA WA ) MAR1lEY MNK Fs tela �� �► • awNlY ol~ DAUR ) 1 HERM CERTIFY, that an this day, before me. an r tb In the State atasesaid and is ffie Catatp aforesaid to laic aeknowl ea appeared: VICTOR KUSAK FrasYattt of V.TJL REAwy, IENC, F wbo has produced his driven lieease as idendfic aaw and �►b 0 did WITNESS alp icand and atficsal seal this•-- day , This instruawnt writs prepared by: Manuel M. Arvew. P.A. 2W0 S. Dbde Hwy.. Suite 101 Miami. Florida 33133 STATE OF FLORIDA wasia ri. anew w est� e ecswv two" Aft n. Vw a.wepe.o.vora�. ro X08 �COURTWUSE TOWER LOCATION Off etc: I U�UO�O•»�� 948230422 1994 MAT It lb:M OU1T{laif M, DEED THIS QUrrC1.AI14I DEED., executed this;. h day of May. 1994. by JOEL RUSIN, a married man, whose past office address is LV it* .,d tt! `l ,a�+.:�•sem--it,( first parry. to V.T.R. REAL7% INC, a '1p�ds corporsttott. whose post -free address is -11-&N .d tot. U-t.c].t�..;. C- . second parry WITNESSETH. That the said party of the fust part. for and in consideration of the sum of Tea (510.010) Donau and Nan00---to wit in hand paid by the said party -of the a second part, the receipt wheteoi is. bereby acknowledged, does hereby remiae, release and quit -claim unto the said second party forever. all the right. title. Interco. claim and demand which the said first party bas in and to the tollowing described lot, piece or'paiiel 'of ;and. shuatoi, lying and being in the County of Rade State of Florida. to,wk:, The West SO feet of L.otr 1. 2 and 3. in Blcek 72. SO11734 C1TY OF MIAMI. according to the Plat there as recorded in Plat Book "8'. at Page 41. of the Public Records of Dade County. Florida, DOCSIPME 248.4ki SuRtx 186.30 Folio # 01.0207-020-1020 "VE ► ftNIM, t LEku DACE t OUNT►. FL This property does. not cottstitute.tbe homestead of the Gmator nor any contiguous land thereof. The Grantor resides at s< t t 1+t eo • ......: ,err . c { ,i A to 0-4 TO HAVE ARID TO HOLO the saute together with all and singular the appurtenances thereunto beioagingor in anywise appertsining. and all the estate, right; tide. intereit. lien, equity and claim wbatsoever of the said fust party. either in law or equity to the only proper use. benefit and beboat of the said second party forever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The said para of the fust part has hereunto set his band and seal the day and yeitr first .above written. Signed. sealed and delivered In the presence of: Vftowu sip ALI i.t �- J- RUBIN 1' srwcs�. w.. oearor► wumn ,,.. he\.. �l•�t/i� i /�9/Sii7i+/•✓ IWItNE4 R1MN, STATE OF FLORIDA ) COUNTY OF DAD6 ) I HKKKNY CERTIFY, toad on this day beton toe. an off m -r duly author and in floe State aforesaid and is the Cconly afore+eaid to take acknosa►ledgenetits. persooaw appeared: fOltL RUMN. a< marticd man w1.ol has ptadtict:d fah dsivert umnse as identHkation and who did take an unth. WITNIUSS any hand and officaal seal this G day of M' 1994. NOTASTATE Y _• . -nis in"rueeeent was prepared by: Maa .t M. Arvean. Esq. 2000 S. Dixie li my.. Sake 101 Miami. Flo, ids 33133 COUR-AGUSE TCWiR, SWORN TO AND 21111=18ED BEFORE WE ON January 10. 1904 • e ria you: ra eAlf�aw o La �`- am. CLM. CM= r i i Ta: Deed File 4usbar 93-s42 ^' !I PropertyI dent l f i cat l Or. No. 01-0207-020-1020 = rff. I rs J 1 •� -. IJLL•U'. _ My CpmuSSO'1 DfT.11Alt 1 "P,; a T A X D E E D A STALL• 09 FLORIDA AND LIENS. AND TO ANY BIGHT. INTEREST. ItJBLIC Thls tnstrtslent prepared by COUNTY OF DME sae EASEMENTS. RESTRICTIONS. AND COVENANTS THAT SataA Davis N Tax Safi -t1flczte Number 90-574 Issued an June 01. 1991, Ci aria the app , .r the Ismunce of a tax dud was f l Ifkd In the off Ica 04 ' of the Dads y fax Collector. The apollcsst bavinQ pard or rsdemed L at other taxes or tax sat' certificates ^n the property described below. a1d due rntlee of sale having been published. and no person entitled to do Q► so having appeare3 to redoes said land. such land was sold tor, cash fycosMy & o"OVA$ "cam Veen to: JOEL. RUSIN O°O"aC08"'c•eJc++ sh08e address is: YYm4 r:W.s� .O. BOX 402278 ItaRrFY B1Y� ^•-!i ' !11AY 1 BEACH. FL. 33110 CVU CNota CO&Vf Ino the highest bidder at trete #hili celfs he 18 an January Qp. tYsq. and w:o has paid the sun Of his bid a,a required by the laws of thio state. NOM. on January 10. 1964 the county of Dade. State of Florida. In consideration of the sun of C tia4.777.80) FIGKTY FOUR THOUSAAM SEVEN HUNDRED SENEUTV SFVEk AkA 5.,lIPr---------------------- dollars does hereby sell the follo7ing lands situated In,Dado County. Florida. and described as follows: WSOFT OF LOTS 1-2 i 3 BLK 72 CITY OF <;IAYI SOUTH PR "I � �•.... �•� N Mitn6seed by: HARVEY RUVIa Clerk of Circuit Court pads ty. for Ida `••• �r 7 Z..r%L. �.�!iC'/ BY: EPUM RK AA BEFORE ME. the undersigned Zry pub Ile. porsonall #eared 8_ A FERNAHD[1 . Deputy Clerk of the Circuit Court In for Dads County. Florida. who is personally known to m and who actnowlsdgad the sxecutIon of tr.19 instrument to be h I a can free act and deed for the use and purposes therein merit loned. 19 SWORN TO AND 21111=18ED BEFORE WE ON January 10. 1904 La ORIKMAL NMARY, rA iRl arARYl`t=CSrATZOF = CN01s3MNO.CCa= 4btary Public. i ata of Florida, At Largs N c My CpmuSSO'1 DfT.11Alt 1 "P,; Pr Ra THIS DEED IS SUBJECT TO GOVERNMENTAL TAXES c„ AND LIENS. AND TO ANY BIGHT. INTEREST. ItJBLIC Thls tnstrtslent prepared by sae EASEMENTS. RESTRICTIONS. AND COVENANTS THAT SataA Davis n MAY SURVIVE THE ISSUANCE Of THIS TAX DEED IN Deputy Clark of Circuit Court ACCORDAME WITH APPLICABLE LAW Dade County. Florida +�a I I 11 i sii� i ti= i o 8 9 R 2{ '4'J [t• RW0/SIG�I�YiO/Bit 0742-7450O0rti. /gyp n� p� �`q R. � 414 re21 JO Sec. 12 .Twp 54 5,1� 41 E EASEMENT . - IMM afts weal t A.. Isom - - - The undersigned. in consideration of the payment of 51.00 and other good artd valuable consider& - tion, the adequacy and receipt of which is hereby acknowledged. Stant and Sive to Fb *b Power Light Company. its licensees, -Sent-, uwce-cors, and assigns, ari euement fore:+!er'for the cons c—.... tion. operation'and maintenance of overhead and underground deetiic utility faoilidn Orieludin Iwim. palm, guys, cables, conduits and appurtenant equipment) to be installed from tim- to time. with the right to reconstruct, improve, add to, eNargo. cisanpe the voltigi, as well as, the sire of and rma!e such fticilities'or any of than within an assemmrt daraibad a=`f6ilowi: THE EAST TEN ( 10) FEET OF THE WEST 50 FEET OF' LOTS 1..2 and 3. BLOCK 7= OF 'MAP OT MIAMP AGCORPtNG_.TO THE PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOR B. AT PAGE. ,41 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF DARE COUNTY, ID FLORA LESS THE SOUTH 15'FEET OP SAID LOT 1 TOGETHER WITH i THE EAST 15 FEET OP THE WEST 50 FEET OF THE ,SOUTFF 15 FEET OF SAID LOT 1. i SLI . s Collected 3 � _SURTAX t oe. WMP Cdeected C4as It- Intmrele Tei Gmtected Rk f! dl�� tlSp& Br Towthm with t'hb riaht to permit any other pmon, firm or caspovation to aaach wits to any heaitim hamroder and lay able and conduit within the easement and to age, to lbs same for eommunicatieau purposes; the right of ingress and este&& to Haid prernises at all dmn;`the right to dew the land and kasp it cl ared of all mass, undergrowth sod other obstructions witidn the easement area; to tthn and cut and keep and cut . all dead, wear. h avAng or . ts*" rs ;ants butd& nf tine ens meet arse whisb -dsht intim with or ha upon the Ica" or systema of cow or porter transmission or W*stribution;,wind further finis, so the fltw kit =ftnt' tate mdenigaed has *a power to Vast, if at a% the rights hwWnaboera panted on `' tbv land heretofore described, over, aloe& under and so ms ft eoads..stlaets cr 1210,10'm ad. mitts or through said pi'opertY• IN WTANM WHEREOF. the undersigned has signed and sued this instrument on , 19 MOWS M o.,.:ni *Wft= s.w Signed. sealed and delivered WOW— fT. wcporr in the presence of: &sea. vwdm WWW= P. ezm=Lt %i gtm cam oouai i6inasr-�Priai3Cilt Attest. 1 Witaes Somtsry (Corp. Sed) STATE or rt ANL1 C`C1f.114TY S1P... The tonsgohig instrument was ack�novarledSsd before ane thio day of 1 ;19s b L) to -khan L�GjL.SQ.-�-� tette_ ..u....,�, Y - � ty0 °'-. r VA - My My Commission Expires: Not Stale of Mehr POrfic Sixes d Awk / i4 rI f+e•ni s chs♦ n isle Q. 1lti! aw las MM s•u. t�a.s r 301008 er6cr-7 PH T39 - 88R3646 t 4 1385 1 rb 585 COBIBI w =No= VIZB 7= ?-Ann D Fsym OP rm clTi OF iam THIS COVENANT. made and entered into this day of3�ieYiTin%'>Q 1988, by VICTOR BALSAM, a single man, !the "OWNER"), and the 0217 OF MIAMI, a municipal corporation of the State of Florida, in the County of Dade, (the "CITY"); WITETH: WHEREAS, VICTOR BALSAM, a single man, is the fee ODUER of the Wiest 5^ Feet of Lots 1, 2, 3 and all of Lots u and 5, BLOCK 72 S, CITY OF MIAMI, according W Ulm plat th�-cof, as recorded In Plat Pock B, at Pane tet, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, with a street address as follows: 901 S. Miami Avenue, (the "PREMISES"); and WHEREAS, Section r -mow ui Litre Cwr of Linc Ciai req.:ires that rz pe, -_;t for construction, reconstruction, remodeling, renovation or repairing in the amount of $25,000 or more in value. or covering 65,0 q.:Zre feet or more in floor/surface area for any cuiloing. z1.tulLwc vt wa,wi..p eViiit� ;: Issued until all portions of tthe applicant's lot, tract or parcel of land ly+ng within the CITY'S officially established right -of -war have been dedicated to the public for street purposes; and WHEREAS, Section 54-48 provides that In the event a porti.)n or the existing building or structure is allowed to remain within the CITY'$ officially established ri$Zt-of-way the owner of the structure shall execute a covenant running with the land in favor of the CY!T before a building permit 13 issued, wherein the Amer agrees to dedicate that portion of his property under th' enervwchwtent and within the officially established right o£ way to the CITY and to remove• arW encroachments whenever the existing building or structure is damnlished or damaged beyond repair; and WunF.AS. OWNER . has requested CITY to allow an existing encroachment described as follw3: Building encroaches into west 5 feet of Lot � and the 25 foot corner radius on the northwest corner of Lot 5. Block 72 S. CITY OF MIAMI, ac:ording to the plat thereof, 33 recorded in Plat Book B, at Pagp 4h, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, ("FACROACHME??") to reeriln within the Indicated area of the public right-of-way lying thetxeen the platted or Oadiaated right-of-way line and tt.a established Wse tui lding lane; zwm! IN _ c� - KC. .7t7J .JVt, WHEREAS, OWNER has requested CITY to issue the building perms to fcr renovation of a building on, the PREMSES althour a portion of the PREMISES is located within the CM1s Officially established .right-0f-wW ,and has not been eAdlated to the public as set fbrth here1nabove; NOW, THEREFORE, in. consideration of the premises OWPW hereby covenants, promises, and a0ees as foll ors: 1. OWNER ahall dedicate that portion. of the PREPaSES within the- officially established right-cf-wary and under the ENCPDA0fME?f to CITi and shall remove, the ENCROACHMENT at 'its o++ncost and expense at such time as the ENCROACHMENT is'demolished or damaged beyond repair. 2. OWNER does hereby ` ocvenant to indemn Y, 'Cetend, save and hold harmless C1111 frexa any claims demands or liabi-lities of any nature whatsoever arising out of or because of this' instrument. 3. This Covenant shall be recorded In trio Public Records• of Dade County, .Florida and the provi cions hereof shall constitute a Covenant Running with the Land and shall remain in Pull force and effect and be. binding upon it= rntera, and AssiRna, and shall be a condition' impliedin any, ocnveyance or otew _«•,•t+no the titin of the aforesaid PREMSE$ or any portion thereof. IN WrTNE!Z WHEREOF, Gaoivel+ isda Qa,a3ed •h___ •• t- be eyrnttAd And signed in its name by its proper offi'oer and its,00rporate, seal to Di: affixed hereto on the date first above seL forth. t Signed, Sealed and Delivered In the Presence of: l/ac� Qso to `letur! RaAL-asnga-m toF�. n I `�-tf L M lilA r sa_ e8a t ave a Adore33 , Zwjd W1 as to Silpat9ft Wi tneas ne `IV A600458 �r _ 2- 00 _� ♦,.tea . �� - � , . .. tc. i 3851 R 587 N STAT= Or FLORIDA) CMnfTY Or DADS ) Y ii RAM CCR?IFY that on trim day persaml.y appeared before gm, an OMOer del, naft Ised to adlalnlster oaths and taice admoaledgwnts, VICTOR BALSM, a alnsle man, to ae well Wows to be. the person described. 1n and who esaduted the foewg*ins lnstrvmwnt and aftaimledpd before ae that he executed the some freely and voluntarlly for the purpose therein expressed. YPlN= 4 hand and offYMsl meal at Mlani, County of Dade and State of Florida, thisXp day of A.D., 1988. Berm" marc sma or Rmrc My ae on xp res: Notary Fumic, btateFlorida at Large APPROVED AS TO FORM AND MRRECr*;SS A 0 /4 4P t7 ttor ney 16 f 9 b PREPARED BY: APPROVED: 9 .• . . ........... tt. s•� o 1 Department o[am rtoa�nt b e I o���n"r w°sef+� 8,u(•o,u.,.p nti� .. tvc:".a;:,�� �G1�Y OF * INCORP CRATED * ZONING FACT SHEET ri I8 96 Q -M Case Number: 1999-0286 10 -Jan -00 Item No: 1 Location: Approx. 900, 901,920 S. Miami Ave. and Legal: (Complete legal description on file with the Office of Hearing Boards) Applicant: Brickell Main Street, LTD A. Vicky Garcia -Toledo, Esq. 200 S. Biscayne Blvd 200 S. Biscayne Blvd. Suite 2500 Suite 2500 Miami, FL 33131 Miami, FL 33131 App. Ph: (305) 350-2409 Rep. Ph: (305) 350-2409 ext Rep. Fa (__) = ext Zoning: SD -7 Central Brickell Rapid Transit Commercial -Residential Districts Request: Approx. 900, 916-918 SE Miami Ave. Rd., 10,20,26,36,50,60,62-64 SW 9 St., 1,25,29,41,43,45,47,55,57,59,75,81 SW 10 St., and 926-928 SE 1 Ave. Special Exceptions as part of a Major Use Special Permit for Brickell Main Street, as listed in Ordinance No. 11000, as amended, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Article 6, Section 607, SD 7 Central Brickell Rapid Transit Commercial -Residential District, to allow a Bar/Lounge open to the public within the SD -7 District, and per Article 9, Section 917.1.2, Valet Parking, generally, to allow valet parking up to fifty percent of existing offstreet parking spaces. Continued from Zoning Board Hearing of 12/20/99. Purpose: This will allow a mixed use multistory structure on this site. Recommendations: Planning Department: Approval with conditions Public Works: No comments Plat and Street Committee: N/A Dade County Transportation: No comments Enforcement History, If any C.E.B. Case No:. N/A Last Hearing Date: Found: N/A Violation(s) Cited: N/A Ticketing Action: N/A Daily Fine: $0.00 Affidavit Non -Compliance Issued on: Warning Letter sent on: Total Fines to Date: $0.00 Lien Recorded on: Comply Order by: CO-- 188 Analysis for Special Exceptions for the BRICKELL MAINSTREET PROJECT located at 900 South Miami Avenue CASE NO. 1999-0286 Pursuant to Ordinance 11000, as amended, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, the subject proposal for the Brickell Mainstreet Project has been reviewed to allow the following Special Exceptions: • Special Exception per Article 6, Section 607 to allow a Bar/lounge, open to the public, within the SD -7 district; • Special Exception per Article 9, Section 917.1.2 to allow Valet service to a hotel. The requested Special Exceptions are for the purpose of allowing a hotel development within the proposed mixed-use project to accommodate a Bar/lounge and provide valet parking. The project consists of 175,500 sq. ft. of retail and restaurant use and a total of 288 hotel rooms, with 1,040 parking spaces, for the property located at approximately 900 South Miami Avenue within the Brickell area (see attached legal description, location maps and aerial photographs for exact property boundaries). Note: These Special Exceptions also encompasses the subordinate permits listed on the attached zoning write-up. The following findings have been made: • It is found that the proposed retail and hotel development project will benefit the Downtown District by creating a new hotel use in the Central Brickell area to serve Downtown area business travelers and visitors. • It is found that the subject of these Special Exceptions, specifically a Bar/Lounge and Valet Service for the proposed project, are completely within the scope and character of the project given that it is a high density hotel project to be located within the Central Brickell area of Downtown Miami. • It. is found that upon referral of the proposed project to Public Works and the Downtown NET Office, the following comments were received: 1. Pursuant to the Department of Public Works, the project requires plans for proposed sidewalk, and swale area improvements prior to the issuance of a building permit; and 2. Pursuant to the Downtown NET Office; the applicant shall submit a parking plan for construction- employees and temporary parking arrangements for the existing building while the new building is under construction; said parking plan shall be subject to the review and approval by the Department of Planning and Zoning prior to the issuance of any building permits. • It is found that the Department 'of Planning and Zoning is in concurrence, with these comments and will require compliance with the above referenced conditions prior to the issuance of any building permits for the proposed project. • It is found that the project depicts a total of 3 vehicular drop off areas to serve the . project. One of these is on S.W.9' Street (serving the retail component of the project); and the other two are on S.W. 100' Street (one of which serves just the hotel, and the other serves the retail component of the project). Being that S.W. 10" Street is a designated Primary Pedestrian Pathway, the department contends that providing 2 drop off areas on S.W.:10'' Street is excessive and'will detract from the pedestrian character anticipated for that street. The project does not require 3 drop off areas in total. The drop off area serving the retail component of the project located along S.W. 10`'' Street should be eliminated so that addition on -street parking may be provided to serve the project. • It is found that with respect to all additional criteria as specified in Section 1.305 of Zoning Ordinance 11000, the proposal has been reviewed and found to be adequate. Based on these findings, the Department of Planning and Zoning is recommending approval of the, requested Development Project with the following conditions: 1. Pursuant to the Downtown NET Office, the applicant shall submit a parking plan for construction employees while the new building is under construction; said parking plan shall be subject to review and, approval by the Department of Planning and Zoning prior to the issuance of any building permits'. 2. Pursuant to the Department of Public Works, • the applicant shall provide plans for proposed. sidewalk and swale area improvements prior. to . the . issuance of a building permit. 3. Pursuant to the findings herein regarding the proposed vehicular drop 'off areas, the drop off area serving the retail. component of the project located along S.W 101h Street should be eliminated so: that addition on -street parking may be provided to serve the project. Miami Zoning Board Resolution: ZB 2000-0257 Monday, January 10, 2000 Mr. Ricardo D. Ruiz offered the following Resolution and moved its adoption Resolution: AFTER CONSIDERING THE FACTORS SET FORTH IN SECTION 1305 OF ORDINANCE 11000, THE ZONING BOARD GRANTED THE SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS AS PART OF A MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT FOR BRICKELL MAIN STREET, AS LISTED IN ORDINANCE 11000, AS AMENDED, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, ARTICLE 6, SECTION 607, SD -7 CENTRAL BRICKELL RAPID TRANSIT COMMERCIAL -RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS, TO ALLOW A BAR/LOUNGE OPEN TO THE PUBLIC WITHIN THE SD -7 DISTRICT, AND PER ARTICLE 9, SECTION 917.1.2, VALET PARKING, GENERALLY, TO ALLOW VALET PARKING FOR UP TO FIFTY PERCENT OF EXISTING OFFSTREET PARKING SPACES FOR THE PROPERTIES LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY 900,901 AND 920 SOUTH MIAMI AVENUE, 900 AND 916-918 SE MIAMI AVENUE ROAD, 10, 20, 26, 36, 50, 60 AND 62-64 SW 9TH STREET, 1, 25, 29, 41, 43, 45, 47, 55, 57, 59, 75 AND 81 SW 10TH STREET, AND 926-928 SE 1ST AVENUE, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS "EXHIBIT B" HEREBY ATTACHED, PUBLIC RECORDS OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA; ZONED SD -7 CENTRAL BRICKELL RAPID TRANSIT COMMERCIAL -RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS. THESE SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS WERE GRANTED PER PLANS ON FILE WITH A TIME LIMITATION OF TWENTY-FOUR MONTHS IN WHICH A BUILDING PERMIT MUST BE OBTAINED, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS BY THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING: 1) PURSUANT TO THE DOWNTOWN NET OFFICE, THE APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT A PARKING PLAN FOR CONSTRUCTION EMPLOYEES WHILE THE NEW BUILDING IS UNDER CONSTRUCTION; SAID PARKING PLAN SHALL BE SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF ANY BUILDING PERMITS, AND 2) PURSUANT TO THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, THE APPLICANT SHALL PROVIDE PLANS FOR PROPOSED SIDEWALK AND SWALE AREA IMPROVEMENTS PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT. Upon being seconded by Mr. Charles J. Flowers, the motion was passed and adopted by the following vote: Mr. George Barket Yes Ms. Gloria M. Basila Yes Mr. Charles J. Flowers Yes Ms. Ileana Hernandez -Acosta No Mr. Osvaldo Moran-Ribeaux Away Mr. Humberto J. Pellon No Mr. Fidel A. Perez No Mr. Juvenal Pina No Mr. Ricardo D. Ruiz Yes Mr. Georges Williams Yes AYE: 5 NAY: 4 ABSTENTIONS: 0 Case No.: 1999-0286 Item Nbr: Miami Zoning Board Resolution: ZB 2000-0257 Monday, January 10, 2000 W14- .1 is y Lot 1, less the West 50 feet thereof, and the South 1/2 of Lot 2, less the West 50 feet thereof, in Block72, of South, City of Miami, according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book "B" at Page 41, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County; 916-918 S.E. Miami Avenue Lot 18, Block 71of South, City of Miami according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book "B" at Page 41, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County; 55 S.W. 10 Street The North half ('/z) of Lot 2, less the West 50 feet thereof, and all of Lot 3, less the West 50 feet thereof in Block 72, South, City of Miami, according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 'B" at Page 41, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County; 900 S.E. Miami Avenue Lots 5, 6, 7,-9, 16, all of Lots 17 and 20, Block 71, City of Miami South, Plat Book "B", Page 41; 36 S.W. 9 Street; 50 S.W. 9 Street; 62-64 S.W. 9 Street; 59 S.W. 10 Street; 57 S.W. 10 Street; 29 S.W. 10 Street West 75 feet of Lot 9 and an undivided one-half (%s) interest in Lot 9 less the West 75 feet thereof, Block 72, South, City of Miami, Plat Book 'B" at Page 41; 926 -928 S.E. V Avenue Lot 21, in Block 71 of S. of MAP OF MIAMI CO., FLA, a subdivision, according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book B at Page 41 of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida; 25 S.W. 10 Street Lot 8, Block 71, South, City of Miami, according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book "B" at Page 41 of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida; 60 S.W. 9 Street Lot 4, Block 71, South, City of Miami according to the Plat Bok thereof, as recorded in Plat Book B, Page 41, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida 26 S.W. 9 Street The East 26 feet of Lot 15, Block 71 South, City of Miami according to the Plat Bok thereof, as recorded in Plat Book B, Page 41, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida The East 28 feet of the West 125 feet of Lot 15, Block 71 South, City of Miami according to the Plat Bok thereof, as recorded in Plat Book B, Page 41, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida Go- 188 ZONING BOARD ACTION FOR SPE XCEPTION I moue-tbt the request on Agenda Item # be�DFNMD) GRANTED* that the requirements of Article 16 MtKh} 1 �vERE WALOT) satisfied by relevant evidence in the record ot:Ihe_n»bli¢ hearing. (a) as stated in the City's,findings of fact, or (b) as demonstrated by the petitioner, or , 1305.5 Utilities. Due consideration shall be given to utilities required, with particuiar reference to availability and capacity of systems, location of connections, and potentially adverse appearance or other adverse effects on adjoining and nearby property and the character of the area. 1305.6 Drainage. (c) on the basis of the following: Due consideration shall be given for drainage,'with particular reference to effect on adjoining and nearby properties and on general drainage The Zoning Board, in its decision to (GRANT) (DENY) the special s'stems in the area Where major drainage volumes appear likely and exception, shall make written findings that the applicable recapacity of available systems is found marginal or inadequate, requirements of consideration shall beven to possibilities for recharge of groundwater this Zoning Ordinance, Section 2305, (HAVE) (HAVE NOT) been met. supply on the property, temporary retention with gradual discharge, or (CIRCLE APPROPRIATE CONDITIONS) other remedial measures. 1305.1 Ingress and Egress. 1305.7 Preservation of Natural Features. Due consideration shall be given to adequacy of ingress and egress to the property, and structure and uses thereon, with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire and emergency. 1305.2 Offstreet Parking and Loading. Due consideration shall be given to offstreet parking and loading facilities as related to adjacent streets, with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, internal traffic flow and control, arrangement in relation to access in case of fire or other emergency, and screening and landscaping. 1305.3 Refuse and Service Areas. , Due consideration shall be given to the location, scale, design, and screening of refuse and service area to the manner in which refuse is to be stored; and to the manner and timing of refuie collection and deliveries, shipments, or other service activities, as such matters relate to the location and nature of uses on adjoining properties and to the location and character of adjoining public ways. 1305.4 Signs and Lighting. Due consideration shall be given to the number, size, character, location, and orientation of proposed signs, and of proposed lighting for signs and premises, with particular reference to traffic safety, glare, and compatibility and harmony with adjoining and nearby property and the character of the area Due consideration shall be given to provision for the preservation of existing vegetation and geological features whenever possible. 1305.8 Control of Potentially Adverse Effects Generally In addition to consideration of detailed elements indicated above, as appropriate to the particular class or kind of special permit and the circumstances of the particular case, due consideration shall be given to potentially adverse effects generally on adjoining and nearby properties, the area, the neighborhood, or the City, of use or occupancy as proposed, or its location, construction, design, character, scale or manner of operation. Where such potentially adverse effects are found, consideration shall be given to special remedial measures appropriate in the particular circumstances of the case, including screening or buffering, landscaping, control of manner or hours of operation, alteration of use of such space, or such other measures as are required to assure that such potential adverse effects will be eliminated or minimized to the maximum extent reasonably feasible, and that the use of occupancy will be compatible and harmonious with other development in the area to a degree which will avoid substantial depr%ciation of the value of nearby PjO V r z` `Sivtature Agenda Item TO I D 6 Date 61 0 X188 900 SOUTH MIAMI AVE SD-7/CENTRAL BRICKELL RAPID TRANSIT COMMERCIAL -RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT. per Article 17 for a parking structure containing 1,040 parking spaces. MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT, per Articles 17 for a phased project as follows: Phase I All retail uses and parking to support use. Phase II Hotel Tower and parking to support use. Phase III Pedestrian Bridge over South Miami Avenue to connect retail areas on the second level. VARIANCE for 91h Street side setback (15 feet required, 5 and 10 feet provided), as per City of Miami Zoning Ordinance 11,000 as amended Article 6, Section 607. VARIANCE for setback of upper levels above 48 feet (10 feet required, 0 provided), as per City of Miami Zoning Ordinance 11,000 as amended Article 6, Section 607. PER City of Miami Zoning Ordinance 11000, this Major Use also encompasses the following special permits: SPECIAL EXCEPTION as per Article 6, Section 607 to allow Bar/Lounge open to the public within the SD -7 district. SPECIAL EXCEPTION as per Article 9, Section 917.1.2 to allow valet parking up to fifty percent of existing offstreet parking spaces. CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 918.2 for staging and parking during constriction. CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 925.3.8 to allow development/construction/ rental signage. CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 6; Section 607.3.1 to,. allow construction trailer. . CLASS 11 SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 92')A providing a total of four (4) 12 s 35 loading berths. including the reduction of two from 12 x 35 to 10 Y 25. CLASS II SPECIAL PERMITS as per Article 6, Section 607.3 for new construction in the SD-7 District. CLASS II SPECIAL PERMITS as per Article 6, Section 607.3 for temporary fence in the SD-7 District. CLASS 11 SPECIAL PERMIT to waive certain. requirements of the City of Miami Parking Guide and Standards. CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT to waive certain requirements of Brickell Promenade Design Development Plan and. Urban Guidelines. 41 Mc hee, Date Coyning Inspector II CITY OF MIAMI OFFICE OF HEARING BOARDS APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTION SECTION 2-653 OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, AS AMENDED, GENERALLY REQUIRES ANY PERSON WHO RECEIVES COMPENSATION, REMUNERATION OR EXPENSES FOR CONDUCTING LOBBYING ACTIVITIES TO REGISTER AS A LOBBYIST WITH THE CITY CLERK, PRIOR TO ENGAGING IN LOBBYING ACTIVITIES BEFORE CITY STAFF, BOARDS, COMMITTEES AND THE CITY COMMISSION. A COPY OF SAID ORDINANCE IS AVAILABLE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK (MIAMI CITY HALL), LOCATED AT 3500 PAN AMERICAN DRIVE, MIAMI, FLORIDA 33133 NOTE: THIS APPLICATION MUST BE TYPEWRITTEN AND SIGNED IN BLACK INK. Within the City generally, or within certain zoning districts, certain structures, uses, and/or occupancies specified in this ordinance are of a nature requiring special and intensive review to determine whether or not they should be permitted in specific locations, and if so, the special limitations, conditions, and safeguards which should be applied as.reasonably necessary promote the general purposes of this Zoning Ordinance and, in particular, to protect adjoining properties and the neighborhood from avoidable potentially adverse effects. It is further intended that the expertise and judgment of the Zoning Board be exercised in making such determinations, in accordance with the rules, considerations and limitations relating to Special Exceptions (see Article 16 of the Zoning ordinance). Formal public notice and hearing is mandatory for Special Exceptions. The Zoning Board shall be solely responsible for determinations on applications for Special Exceptions except when otherwise provided for in the city Code. All applications shall be referred to the Director of the department Planning and Development for his recommendations and the Director shall make any further referrals required by these regulations. I, Brickell Main Street, Ltd., hereby apply to the City of Miami Zoning Board for approval of a Special Exception for the property located at South Miami Avenue between SW and S.E. 9' Street and 10' Street, folio number See Exhibit "A". Nature of Proposed Use (please be specific): Valet narkine and hotel bar as accessory to a retail/hotel center. In support of this application, the following material is submitted. ,� 1. Two original surveys of the property prepared by a State of Florida Registered Land Surveyor within one year from the date of application. ,r 2. Four copies signed and sealed by a State of Florida Registered Architect or engineer of site plans showing (as required) property boundaries, existing (if any) and proposed structure(s), parking, landscaping, etc.; building elevations and dimensions and computations of lot area and building spacing. f 3. Affidavits disclosing ownership of property covered by applications and disclosure of interest from (attached to application). d 4. Certified list of owners of real estate within a 375 -foot radius of the outside boundaries of property covered by the application. 1 5. At least two photographs that show the entire property (land and improvements). 6.. Recorded warranty deed and ax forms for the most current year available that show the present.owner(s) of the property. 7. Other (Specify and attach cover letters explaining why any document you are attaching" is pertinent to this application). 8. Fee of $ to apply toward the cost of processing according to Section 62-156 of the Zoning Ordinance: Special Exception (Fees are •inclusive in MUSP fee) $ 800.00 Special Exception requiring automatic city commission review 12,000.00 Extension of time for special exception $ 500.00 Public hearing mail notice fees, including cost of handling and mailing per notice - $ 3.50 Surcharge equal to applicable fee from item above, not to exceed eight hundred dollars ($800.00) except from agencies of the city; such surcharge to be refunded to the applicant if there isnot appeal from a property owner within three hundr d and seventy- rve (375) feet of the subject property. Signature.... Name . A.. Vic Garcia-Toledo Esg.. Address 200 th Bisca ne Blvd-Suite 2500 Miami, FL-33131 Phone/Fax 305-350-2409 / 305-374-7593 Date STATE OF FLORIDA' COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day ofNovem6er,1999, by-Vicky Garcia-Toledo, Esq. who is personally known to me Name: El, Z b a44 t0&;Ck". _ ELIZABETH MARCHENA MY COMMISSION CC 815886 Notary Public -State of Florida EXPIRES: N 19, 2003 Commission No.: OC � /S �B y ;p h Bonded Thru Pard Insurance Agency, My Commission Expires: ZONING FACT SHEET Case Number: 1999-0287 10 -Jan -00 Item No: 2 Location: Approx. 900,901,920 S. Miami Ave. and Legal: (Complete legal description on file with the Office of Hearing Boards) Applicant: Brickell Main Street, LTD A. Vicky Garcia -Toledo, Esq. 200 S. Biscayne Blvd. 200 S. Biscayne Blvd. Suite 2500 Suite 2500 Miami, FL 33131 Miami, FL 33131 App. Ph: (305) 350-2409 Rep. Ph: (305) 350-2409 ext _ Rep. Fa (___) = ext _ Zoning: SD -7 Central Brickell Rapid Transit Commercial -Residential Districts Request: Approx. 900, 916-918 SE Miami Ave. Rd., 10,20,26,36,50,60,62-64 SW 9 St., 1,25,29,41,43,45,47,55,57,59,75,81 SW 10 St., and 926-928 SE 1 Ave. Variances as part of a Major Use Special Permit for Brickell Main Street, from Ordinance No. 11000, as amended, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Article 6, Section 607, SD -7 Central Brickell Rapid Transit Commercial -Residential District, to allow on 9 Street side setbacks of 5' and 10' (15' required), and for setback of upper levels above 48 feet, 0' provided (10' required). Continued from Zoning Board Hearing of 12/20/99. Purpose: This will allow a mixed use multistory structure on this site. Recommendations: Planning Department: Approval with conditions Public Works: No comments Plat and Street Committee: N/A Dade County Transportation: No comments Enforcement History, If any C.E.B. Case No: N/A Last Hearing Date: Found: N/A Violation(s) Cited: N/A Ticketing Action: N/A Daily Fine: $0.00 Affidavit Non -Compliance Issued on: Warning Letter sent on: Total Fines to Date: .$0.00 lien Recorded on: Comply Order by: CEB Action: Al , • ANALYSIS FOR VARIANCES AS A COMPONENT OF A MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT BRICKELL MAINSTREET CASE NO: 1999-0287 The requested Variances are a component of a Major Use Special Permit application for the purpose of allowing a mixed-use development to be located at approximately 900 South Miami Avenue. The Brickell Mainstreet project proposes a mixed-use development with 175,500 sq. ft. of retail and restaurant use and a total of 288 hotel rooms, with 1,040 parking spaces within the Brickell area (see attached legal description, location maps and aerial photographs for exact property boundaries). Pursuant to Ordinance 11000, as amended, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, the subject proposal has been reviewed to permit a structure with the following setbacks: Side street setback along SW 9'' Street Upper level setback required: 15 feet proposed: 5 feet and 10 feet required — above 48 feet: 10 feet proposed: 0 feet In determining the appropriateness of the Variances for the proposed project the following findings have been made: • It is found that the proposed mixed-use development project will benefit the Downtown District by creating new hotel and retail opportunities for visitors, residents and employees of the area. • It is found that the narrow width of subject property is a substantial hardship which limits reasonable use of the property and therefore justifies the requested setback variances. The special conditions attached to the subject property that justify the requested variances are the property's narrow width in conjunction with its Special SD -7 Zoning classification. If the setbacks were to be provided, the project would lose the necessary efficiency in its parking areas due to insufficient space for an efficient layout. If the upper level setbacks were to be provided, the size of the property would cause a final design solution which would put a hardship on reasonable use of the higher portions of the property. M, i► 19 • It is found that the requested ground level setback variance will also allow the project to comply with the intent of the "Brickell Promenade" Guides and Standards which encourage pedestrian friendly design along SW 10' Street. e It is found that the setback variance is being requested in order to develop a project which. can provide an effective parking garage, along with ground level pedestrian activities, and a hotel tower above. • It is found that the proposed project offers the most reasonable solution to the design problem facing this particular site. Based on these findings, the Department of Planning and Zoning is recommending approval of the requested variances and approval of the requested Development Project with the conditions that the applicant comply with all the conditions of the Development Order for the project. 2 Miami Zoning Board Resolution: ZB 2000-0258 Monday, January 10, 2000 Ms Ileana Hernandez -Acosta offered the following Resolution and moved its adoption Resolution: AFTER CONSIDERING THE FACTORS SET FORTH IN SECTION 1903.1 OF ORDINANCE 11000, THE ZONING BOARD GRANTED THE VARIANCES AS PART OF A MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT FOR BRICKELL MAIN STREET, AS LISTED IN ORDINANCE 11000, AS AMENDED, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, ARTICLE 6, SECTION 607, SD -7 CENTRAL BRICKELL RAPID TRANSIT COMMERCIAL -RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS, TO ALLOW A BAR/LOUNGE OPEN TO THE PUBLIC WITHIN THE SD -7 DISTRICT, AND PER ARTICLE 9, SECTION 917.1.2, VALET PARKING, GENERALLY, TO ALLOW VALET PARKING FOR UP TO FIFTY PERCENT OF EXISTING OFFSTREET PARKING SPACES FOR THE PROPERTIES LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY 900, 901 AND 920 SOUTH MIAMI AVENUE, 900 AND 916-918 SE MIAMI AVENUE ROAD, 10, 20, 26, 36, 50, 60 AND 62-64 SW 9TH STREET, 1, 25, 29, 41, 43, 45, 47, 55, 57, 59, 75 AND 81 SW 10TH STREET, AND 926-928 SE 1ST AVENUE, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS "EXHIBIT B" HEREBY ATTACHED,, PUBLIC RECORDS OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA; ZONED SD -7 CENTRAL BRICKELL RAPID TRANSIT COMMERCIAL -RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS. THESE VARIANCES WERE GRANTED PER PLANS ON FILE WITH A TIME LIMITATION OF TWENTY-FOUR MONTHS IN WHICH A BUILDING PERMIT MUST BE OBTAINED, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITION BY THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING: THAT THE APPLICANT COMPLY WITH ALL THE CONDITIONS OF THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER FOR THE PROJECT. Upon being seconded by Mr. Humberto J. Pellon, the motion was passed and adopted by the following vote: Mr. George Barket Yes Ms. Gloria M. Basila Yes Mr. Charles J. Flowers Yes Ms. Ileana Hernandez -Acosta Yes Mr. Osvaldo Moran-Ribeaux Away Mr. Humberto J. Pellon Yes Mr. Fidel A. Perez Yes Mr. Juvenal Pina Yes Mr. Ricardo D. Ruiz Yes Mr. Georges Williams Yes AYE: 9 NAY: 0 ABSTENTIONS: 0 NO VOTES: 0 ABSENTS: 1 Ms. Fernandez: Motion carries 9-0 Case No.: 1999-0287 Item Nbr: 2 - ii Miami Zoning_Boarci Resolution: ZB 2000-0258 Monday, January 10, 2000 EXI:11M WIDE, Lot 1, less the West 50 feet thereof, and the South '/Z of Lot 2, less the West 50 feet thereof, in Block72, of South, City of Miami, according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book "B" at Page 41, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County; 916-918 S.E. Miami Avenue Lot 18, Block 71of South, City of Miami according.to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 'B" at Page 41, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County; 55 S.W. 10 Street The North half ('/�) of Lot 2, less the West 50 feet thereof, and all of Lot 3, less the West 50 feet thereof in Block 72, South, City of Miami, according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book "B" at Page 41, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County; 900 S.E. Miami Avenue Lots 5, 6, 7, 9, 16, all of Lots 17 and 20, Block 71, City of Miami South, Plat Book "B", Page 41; 36 S.W. 9 Street; 50 S.W. 9 Street; 62-64 S.W. 9 Street; 59 S.W. 10 Street; 57 S.W. 10 Street; 29 S.W. 10 Street West 75 feet of Lot 9 and an undivided one-half ('/s) interest in Lot 9 less the West 75 feet thereof, Block 72, South, City of Miami, Plat Book 'B" at Page 41; 926 -928 S.E. 1" Avenue Lot 21, in Block 71 of S. of MAP OF MIAMI CO., FLA, a subdivision, according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book B at Page 41 of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida; 25 S.W. 10 Street Lot 8, Block 71, South, City of Miami, according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book "B" at Page 41 of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida; 60 S.W. 9 Street Lot 4, Block 71, South, City of Miami according to the Plat Bok thereof, as recorded in Plat Book B, Page 41, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida 26 S.W. 9 Street The East 26 feet of Lot 15, Block 71 South, City of Miami according to the Plat Bok thereof, as recorded in Plat Book B, Page 41, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida The East 28 feet of the West 125 feet of Lot 15, Block 71 South, City of Miami according to the Plat Bok thereof, as recorded in Plat Book B, Page 41, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida - 108 ZONING BOARD ACTION ON PET17I191hFOR VARY CE MOTION: I move that the request on Agenda Item # �— be (DENIED) (GRANTED) in that the requirements of Section 1903.1 (WERE) (WERE NOT) satisfied by relevant evidence in the record of the public hearing. , (a) as stated in the City's, finds or fact, or ' (J 's demonstrated by petitioner, or (c) on the basis of the following: The Zoning Board shall make,findings that all of the requirements and ' standards of Section 1903.1 (RAVE BEEN) (RAVE NOT BEEN), demonstrated. CHECK ONE (a) Special conditions and circumstances (EXIST) (DO OF EACH NOT EXIST) which are peculiar to the land, structure or STATEMENT building involved and which are not applicable to other; lands, strucatres, or buildings in the same zoning district 1) as stated in the City's findings of fact _ 2) as demonstrated by the petitioner 3) as otherwise stated below: (b) The special conditions and circumstances (DO) (DO NOT) result from the actions of the petitioner — 1) as stated in the City's findings of fact — 2) as demonstrated by the petitioner _ 3) as otherwise stated below: (c) Literal interpretation of the provisions of zoning ordinance (WOULD) (WOULD NOT) deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same zoning district under the terns of the zoning ordinance and work unnecessary and undue hardships on the petitioner 1) as stated in the City's findings of fact 2) as demonstrated by the petitioner _ 3) as otherwise stated below: (d) Granting the variance requested (WILL) (WILL NOT) convey the same treatment to the individual owner as to the owner of other lands, buildings, or structures in the same zoning district _ 1) as stated in the City's findings of fact _ 2) as demonstrated by the petitioner _ 3) as otherwise stated below: (e) Granting the variance requested (WILL) (WILL NOT) convey the same treatment, any special privilege that is denied by the zoning ordinance to other lands, buildings or structures in the same zoning district (f) If granted the variance (WILL BE) (WELL NOT BE) in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the zoning ordinance, and will not be injurious to the neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare _ 1) as stated in the City's findings of fact _ 2) as demonstrated by the petitioner 3) as otherwise stated below: 00= 138 2W32- Wif 0 A written pelt for a vannnew is sub=med to the officer or agent of the cite sre=pec by the city manager demonstrating all of the following: tai Special conditions and exist which are peculiar to the land. structure. or building involved and which are not applicable to other lands, structures. or ouiid- ings in the same zoning district; (b) The special conditions and circumstances do not result from the actions of the peti- tioner, (c) Lateral mtespretatiom of the provisions of this zosi" ordinance deprives the applicant of rights pommonly enjoyed by other propardes in the same zoning district under the teras: of this zoning ordinance and wazics unnecessary and undue hardship on the (d) Granting the variance requeated cenveys the same treatsaeat to the individual owner as to the owner of other lands, bufld=gs, or saw=esin the same zoning district: (e) The variance, if granted, is the minimum variance that makes p xmlle the reasonable use of the laud. bt 1AB or structure" and (f) The great of the variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of this zoning ordinance, and is not injurious to the nelghborh00d, or otherwise detrimental to the public w►elfam Documents, reports, studies, e-biibits or other writ= or graphic materials, if any, to be used by petitioner in support of the petition and in demonsnation of any or all of the above requirements shall be submitted with the petition. I CITY OF MIAMI OFFICE OF HEARING BOARDS APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE SECTION 2-653 OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, AS AMENDED, GENERALLY REQUIRES ANY PERSON WHO RECEIVES COMPENSATION, REMUNERATION OR EXPENSES FOR CONDUCTING LOBBYING ACTIVITIES TO REGISTER AS A LOBBYIST WITH THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO ENGAGING IN LOBBYING ACTIVITIES BEFORE CITY STAFF, BOARDS, COMMITTEES AND THE CITY COMMISSION. A COPY OF SAID ORDINANCE IS AVAILABLE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK (MIAMI CITY HALL), LOCATED AT 3500 PAN AMERICAN DRIVE, MIAMI, FLORIDA, 33133. NOTE: THIS -APPLICATION MUST BE TYPEWRITTEN AND SIGNED IN BLACK INK. A Variance is a relaxation of the terms of the Zoning Ordinance where such action will not be contrary to the public interest and where owing to conditions peculiar to the property and not the result of actions of the applicant, a literal enforcement of this Ordinance would result in unnecessary and undue hardship on the property. As used in the Zoning Ordinance, a Variance is authorized only for height, area, size of structure, dimensions of yards, other open spaces, off-street parking and/or loading requirements (see Article 19 of the Zoning Ordinance). I, Brickell Main Street, Ltd , hereby petition the City of Miami Zoning Board for a Variance from the terms of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, affecting property located between SW, SE 9`h and I oth Street on South Miami Avenue, folio number See attached Exhibit "A" as specified below. 1. In support of this application, the following material is submitted. ,% 2. Two original surveys of the property prepared by a State of Florida Registered Land Surveyor within one year from the date of application. d 3. Four copies -signed and sealed by a State of Florida Registered Architect or Engineer -of site plans showing (as required) property boundaries, existing (if any) and proposed structure(s), parking, landscaping, etc.; building elevations and dimensions and computations of lot area and building spacing. yr 4. Affidavits disclosing ownership of property covered by applications and disclosure of interest form (attached to application). ,% 5. Certified list of owners of real estate within a 375 -foot radius of the outside boundaries of property covered by the application. d 6. At least two photographs that show the entire property (land and improvements). U 188 7: Recorded warranty deed and tax forms for the most current ent year available that show the present own . er(s) of the property. 8. Other (Specify and attach cover letters explaining'why.any document you are attaching is pertinent to this application). yr 9. Fee, of $39,494.00 to apply toward the cost of processing, according to'Section 42-156, . of the Zoning Ordinance: CS, PR, R-1, R-2, (single-family and duplex residential uses) ........................ $250.00 Piers, docks, wharves and the like, for each Variance from the ordinance, per lineal foot.......... ..................................... ............. ....... $45.00 Minimum.............................................................. $700.00 All 'applications for Variances relating to the same structure shall be assessed a single fee to be calculated, per square: foot of, gross floor area of the proposed structure or addition, based'upon the definition of gross floor area found in Section 2502 of Zoning Ordinance, as amended .......................................... .. $.10 Minimum .......................... .... $650.00 Application for Variance as a result of a change in approved plans or as a result of a violation notice shall be charged an additional fee, per Variance: CS, PR, R-1,R-2� ............. ......................................... $250.00 All other residential districts .......................... �1 ........................ $450.00 10. ,.All nonresidential -districts .................................................. $550.00 Extension of time for Variance ........................... ................ $506.00 Public hearing mail notice fees, including cost of handling and mailing per notice .......................................................................... $3.50 Surcharge equal to applicable fee from items above, not to exceed Eight Hundred Dollars, (S800.00), except from agencies of the City; such surcharge to be refunded to the applicant if there is no appeal from a property owner within three hundred and seventy-five (3 75) feet of the subject property The Variance request is for relief from.tfie provisions of Section. 607.8 of the City of Miami Zoning Ordinance as follows: The subject property is located on 10' Street.which is designated as Bricke 1 11 Promenade by the City of Miami. As such, the City has established guides and standards which requires the creation of spacious public promenades as a pedestrian pathway from Brickell Avenue to V 'Avenue." In order to comply with the intent of the Brickell Promenade design criteria, the project is placing a greater .on 101 Street which requires the movement of the entire project to the North. This I has created the need for this particular variance as to the setback on 9' Stre*et., The narrowness of the property also requires the need for the variance of setback for upper levels above 48 feet. 2 d 11. In support of the application, the applicant is prepared to offer the following evidence, on the point enumerated at Section 1903 of the City of Miami Zoning Ordinance. Note: This application cannot be accepted for Zoning Board action unless all of the following six items are completed. ,i (a) Special conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the land, structure, or building involved and which are not applicable to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same zoning district in that: (list evidence to be produced and use additional sheets, if necessary.) The special conditions discussed above, were not the result of any action on the part of the petitioner; but an effort on the part of the petitioner to comply with the requirements of the Brickell Promenade standards as set forth by the City of Miami. d (b) The special conditions and circumstances do not result from the actions of the petitioner in that: A literal interpretation of 607.8 would preclude the applicant from consistency with the requirements of the City of Miami for Brickell Promenade and therefore place the applicant in an unnecessary and undue hardship position. (c) Literal interpretation of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same zoning district under the terms of the Zoning Ordinance and would work unnecessary and undue hardships on the petitioner in that: Granting of such a variance will not confer any special privilege that is denied by the Zoning Ordinance, since in fact the Zoning Ordinance emphasizes the need for the pedestrian pathway as well as the fulfillment of all requirements. All properties located on 10`h Street have the same or similar requirements of the Brickell Promenade Guides and Standards. �% (d) Granting the Variance requested will not confer on the petitioner that special privilege that is denied by the Zoning Ordinance to other lands, buildings, or structures in the same zoning district in that: Granting of such a variance will not confer any special privilege that is denied by the Zoning Ordinance, since in fact the Zoning Ordinance emphasizes the need for the pedestrian pathway as well as the fulfillment of all requirements . All properties located on lo' Street have the same or similar requirements of the Brickell Promenade Guides and Standards d (e) The Variance, if granted, is the minimum Variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the land, building or structure in that: The variance, if granted, is a minimum variance that would allow the reasonable use of the land and permit a design of the project consistent with the Brickell Promenade Guides and Standards as well as the requirements of pedestrian pathways in order to be consistent with the City of Miami's Downtown Master Plan in creating a friendly pedestrian ambiance at the street level and at the same time creating a spacious corridor between the Metrorail and the Metromover f (f) The grant of the Variance will be in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance, and will not be injurious to the neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare. The variance, if granted, will allow the harmony that is envisioned by the different planning documents adopted by the City of Miami in order to improve the quality of life in the neighborhood 3 C0— 8 10 BRICKELL MAIN STREET A leisure and lifestyle project catering to the home, family and community Developed By: Brickell Main Street, Ltd. Designed By: Beame Architectural Partnership. 116 Alhambra Circle, Suite J' Coral Gables, Florida 33134 • Prepared for: Brickell Main Street, Ltd. LOM Bilzin Sumberg Dunn Price & Axelrod LLP Vicky Garcia Toledo,. Fsq 2500 First Union Financial Center, u 200 South Biscayne Boulevard Miami, FL 33131 00- iss E, i BRICKELL MAIN STREET MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Project Information A. Application for a Major Use Special Permit B. Disclosure of Ownership C. Ownership Affidavit D. Directory of Project Principals E. Project Data Sheet F. City of Miami Zoning Atlas Map II. Project Description A. Zoning Ordinance No. 11000 1. Section 1304.2.1 Application Forms; Supplementary Materials 2. Section 1702.2.1 General Report 3. Section 1702.2.2 Major Use Special Permit Concept Plan III. Supporting Documents Tab 1 Minority Construction Employment Plan Tab 2 Traffic Impact Analysis Tab 3 Site Utility Study Tab 4 Economic Impact Study Tab 5 Survey of Property Tab 6 Drawings Submitted November, 1999 • ARTICLE I. A. B. C. D. E. F. G. • BRICKELL MAIN STREET MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT PROJECT INFORMATION Application for a Major Use Special Permit Disclosure of Ownership Ownership Affidavit State of Florida Certificate of Good Standing Directory of Project Principals Project Data Sheet City of Miami Zoning Atlas Map November, 1999 CITY OF MIAMI . PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPLICATION FOR MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT IT IS INTENDED THAT MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMITS BE REQUIRED WHERE SPECIFIED USES AND/OR OCCUPANCIES INVOLVE MATTERS DEEMED TO BE OF CITYWIDE OR AREA -WIDE IMPORTANCE. THE CITY COMMISSION SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR DETERMINATIONS ON APPLICATIONS FOR MAJOR USE S PECIAL PERMITS. (SEEARTICLE17OFORDINANCE I1000,ASAMENDED, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OFMIAMI, FLORIDA.) THE CITY COMMISSION SHALL REFER ALL APPLICATIONS FOR MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMITS TO THE PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD AND TO THE DIRECTOR OF THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT FOR RECOMMENDATIONS, AND MAY MAKE REFERRALS TO AGENCIES, BODIES, OR OFFICERS, EITHERTHROUGHTHE PLANNING DEPARTMENT ORDIRECTLY, FOR REVIEW, ANALYSIS AND/ORTECHNICAL FINDINGS AND DETERMINATIONS AND REPORTS THEREON. (SEESECTION 13 01. S OF ORDINANCE 11000, AS AMENDED, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA) SECTION 2.633 OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, AS AMENDED, GENERALLY REQUIRES ANY PERSON WHO RECEIVES COMPENSATION, REMUNERATION OR EXPENSES FOR CONDUCTING LOBBYING ACTIVITIES TO REGISTER AS A LOBBYIST WITH THE CITY CLERK, PRIOR TO ENGAGING IN LOBBYING ACTIVITIES BEFORE CITY STAFF, BOARDS, COMMITTEES AND THE CITY COMMISSION. A COPY OF SAID ORDINANCE IS AVAILABLE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK (MIAMI CITY HALL), LOCATED AT 3500 PAN AMERICAN DRIVE, MIAMI, FLORIDA 33133. NOTE. THIS APPLICATION MUST BE TYPERWITENAND SIGNED INBLACBINK: I, Brickell Main Street. Ltd. , hereby apply to the Director of the Planning Department of the City of Miami for approval of a Major Use Special Permit under the provisions of Article 17 of the City of Miami Zoning Ordinance. Property Address: See attached Exhibit "A" Nature of proposed use (be specific): A mixed use phase Qroiect consisting of retail.hotel and parking uses, consisting of 1,040 parkingWKes and a phased project. APPLICATION MATERIALS I attach the following in support and explanation of the application: 1. Two original surveys, prepared by a State of Florida Registered Land Surveyor within one year from the date of application. 2. Affidavit disclosing ownership of property covered by application and disclosure of interest form (attach forms 4-83 and 4a-83 to application). Vi�tt♦♦11 _1k �.. • 0 • APPLICATION MATERIALS (continued) I attach the following in support and explanation of the application: 3. Certified list of owners of real estate within a 375 -foot radius from the outside boundaries of property (attach form 6-83 to application). 4. Maps of the: (a) Existing zoning designation. (b) Adopted comprehensive plan designation for areas on and around the property. 5. General location map showing relation to the site or activity to major streets, schools, existing utilities, shopping areas, important physical features in and adjoining the project, and the like. 6. Concept Plan (a) Site plan and relevant information per Section 1304.2.ld-h. (b) Relationships to surrounding existing and proposed futures uses and activities, systems and facilities, per Section 1702.3.2x. (c) How concept affects existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan principles and designations; tabulation of any required variances, special permits, changes of zoning or exemptions, per Section 1702-3.2b. 7. Developmental Impact Study (an application for development approval for a Development of Regional Impact may substitute). 8. Other (be specific): 9. Fee of $ 29,620.50, for the Major Use Special Permit, based on current fee schedule as set forth in Chapter 62 of the Code of the City of Miami, as amended. 10. Additional fee of $.41.232.00, for any required special permits, changes of zoning or variances set forth in chapter 62 of the Code of the City of Miami, as amended. Total Fee: $ 70.852.50 Signature Name Address Phone/Fax Date Miami, FL 33131 305-350-2409 / 305-374-7593 FINAL APPROVAL OF THIS APPLICATION FOR MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT SHALL CONSIST OF AN EXECUTED RESOLUTION BY THE MIAMI CITY COMMISSION AND A DEVELOPMENT ORDER ATTACHED THERETO WHICH SPECIFIES THE CONDITIONS UNDER WHICH THIS MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT APPLICATION IS APPROVED: IF APPROVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION, SAID RESOLUTION AND DEVELOPMENT ORDERSHALL, UPON EXECUTION THEREOF BE TRANSMITTED TO THE OWNER OR AUTHORIZED AGENT AT THE ADDRESS SPECIFIED ABOVE. Go` ISIs Note 1. Note 2. Note 3. BRICKELL MAIN STREET ADDENDUM TO APPLICATION FOR MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT November, 1999 Request for Major Use Special Permits for: a) To construct a parking structure containing 1,040 spaces. b) Request for a phased project as follows: (i) Phase I All retail uses and parking to support use. (ii) Phase II Hotel tower and parking to support use (iii) Phase III Pedestrian Bridge over South Miami Avenue to connect retail areas on the second level. a) Request for a Variance for set back at ground level on 9 Street. b) Request for Upper Level Setback Variance above 48 feet. a) Special Exception for Valet Parking. b) Special Exception_for Hotel Bar. Note 4. a) Class II Special'Ferniit as Required for Zoning District SD -7 for new construction. b) Class II for a Special Waiver of certain requirements of Brickell Promenade Design Development Plan and Urban Guidelines. c) Class II fora Waiver of certain requirements of the City of Miami Parking Guide and Standards. d) Class II to reduce the size of the loading berths Note 5. e) Class II to allow permanent signage through Development Parameters Guidelines Book a) Class I for Hotel Pool. G 0` 186, APPLICATION MATERIALS (continued) 1 attach the following in support and explanation of the application: b) Class I to permit permanent recreation facilities. c) Class I to permit the staging and parking during construction. d) Class I to allow development/construction/rental signage. and trailer e) Class I to allow construction fence Note 6. To request from the City Commission: a) a waiver from the noise ordinance during the required concrete pours for construction of the project. b) approval for a pedestrian bridge across South Miami Avenue. Note 7. To apply for a Certificate of Appropriateness for ground disturbing activities. Note 8 ® To apply for all lesser permits as may be required to allow development and construction of this phase project as contemplated under this Major Use Special Permit application as submitted and as per plans on file,. Note 9. The above Major Use Special Permit is to encompass all lower ranking special permits necessary to complete the projects as per plans under Tab 6 0 EXHIBIT "A" Lot 1, less the West 50 feet thereof, and the South'/2 of Lot 2, less the West 50 feet thereof, in Block72, of South, City of Miami, according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book "B" at Page 41, of the Public. Records of Miami -Dade County; 916-918 S.E. Miami Avenue Rd.; Folio #01-0207-020-1010 Lot 18, Block 71 of South, City of Miami according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book "B" at Page 41, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County; 55 S.W. 10 Street; Folio #01-0207-010-1200 The North half ('/2) of Lot 2, less the West 50 feet thereof, and all of Lot 3, less the West 50 feet thereof in Block 72, South, City of Miami, according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book "B" at Page 41, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County; 900 S.E. Miami Avenue Rd; Folio # 01-0207-020-1030 Lots 5, 6, 7, 9, 16, all of Lots 17 and 20, Block 71, City of Miami South, Plat Book "B", Page 41; 36 S.W. 9 Street; Folio #01-0207-010-1050 • 50 S.W. 9 Street; Folio #01-0207-010-1060 62-64 S.W. 9 Street; Folio #01-0207-010-1080 59 S.W. 10 Street; Folio #01-0207-010-1180 57 S.W. 10 Street; Folio #01-0207-010-1190 29 S.W. 10 Street; Folio #01-0207-010-1220 West 75 feet of Lot 9 and an undivided one-half ('/2) interest in Lot 9 less the West 75 feet thereof, Block 72, South, City of Miami, Plat Book "B" at Page 41; 926 -928 S.E. I" Avenue; Folio # 01-0207-020-1100 Lot 21, in Block 71 of S. of MAP OF MIAMI CO., FLA, a subdivision, according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book B at Page 41 of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida; 25 S.W. 10 Street; Folio #01-0207-010-1230 Lot 8, Block 71, South, City of Miami, according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book "B" at Page 41 of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida; 60 S.W. 9 Street; Folio #01-0207-010-1070 Lot 4, Block 71, South, City of Miami according to the Plat Bok thereof, as recorded in Plat Book B, Page 41, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida • 26 S.W. 9 Street; Folio #01-0207-010-1040 The East 26.5 feet of Lot 15, Block 71 South, City of Miami according to the Plat Bok thereof, as recorded in Plat Book B, Page 41, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida �� IS • 75 S.W. 10 Street; Folio 901-0207-010-1130 The East 28 feet of the West 125 feet of Lot15, Block 71 South, City of Miami according to the Plat'Bok thereof, as recorded in Plat Book B, Page 41, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida 81 S.W. 10 Street; Folio #01-0207-010-1150 Lots 1 and 2, Block 71, South, City of Miami, Plat Book "B", Page 41; Lots 22, 23 and 24, Block 71, South, City of Miami, Plat Book "B", Page 41; The West 50 feet of Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 72, South, City of Miami, Plat Book "B", Page 41; Lots 4 and 5, Block 72, South, City of Miami, Plat Book "B", Page 41. 900 So. Miami Avenue; Folio #01-0207-010-1010 920 So. Miami Avenue; Folio #01-0207-010-1020 1 S.W. 10 Street; Folio #01-0207-010-1240 10 S.E. 9 Street; Folio #01-0207-020-1020 901 So. Miami Avenue; Folio # 01-0207-020-1040 Lot 19 Block 71, South, City of Miami, Plat Book "B", Page 41; 41, 43, 45 and 47 S.W. 10 Street tLot 3, Block 71, South, City of Miami, Plat Book "B", Page 41; 20 S.W. 9 Street; Folio # 01-0207-010-1030 0 CITY OF MIAMI OFFICE OF HEARING BOARDS APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE SECTION 2-653 OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, AS AMENDED, GENERALLY REQUIRES ANY PERSON WHO RECEIVES COMPENSATION, REMUNERATION OR EXPENSES FOR CONDUCTING LOBBYING ACTIVITIES TO REGISTER AS A LOBBYIST WITH THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO ENGAGING IN LOBBYING ACTIVITIES BEFORE CITY STAFF, BOARDS, COMMITTEES AND THE CITY COMMISSION. A COPY OF SAID ORDINANCE IS AVAILABLE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK (MIAMI CITY HALL), LOCATED AT 3500 PAN AMERICAN DRIVE, MIAMI, FLORIDA, 33133. ****************************************************************************** NOTE: THIS APPLICATION MUST BE TYPEWRITTEN AND SIGNED IN BLACK INK. A Variance is a relaxation of the terms of the Zoning Ordinance where such action will not be contrary to the public interest and where owing to conditions peculiar to the property and not the result of actions of the applicant, a literal enforcement of this Ordinance would result in unnecessary and undue hardship on the property. As used in the Zoning Ordinance, a Variance is authorized only for height, area, size of is structure, dimensions of yards, other open spaces, off-street parking and/or loading requirements (see Article 19 of the Zoning Ordinance). I, _ Brickell Main Street, Ltd , hereby petition the City of Miami Zoning Board for a Variance from the terms of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, affecting property located between SW, SE 9" and 10`h Street on South Miami Avenue, folio number See attached Exhibit "A" as specified below. f 1. In support of this application, the following material is submitted. 2. Two original surveys of the property prepared by a State of Florida Registered Land Surveyor within one year from the date of application. ,% 3. Four copies -signed and sealed by a State of Florida Registered Architect or Engineer -of site plans showing (as required) property boundaries, existing (if any) and proposed structure(s), parking, landscaping, etc.; building elevations and dimensions and computations of lot area and building spacing. d 4. Affidavits disclosing ownership of property covered by applications and disclosure of interest form (attached to application). d 5. Certified list.of owners of real estate within a 375 -foot radius of the outside boundaries of property covered by the application. 6. At least two photographs that show the entire property (land and improvements). • • 7. Recorded warranty deed and tax forms for the most current year available that show the present owner(s) of the property. d 8. Other (Specify and attach cover letters explaining why any document you are attaching is pertinent to this application). f 9. Fee of $39,494.00 to apply toward the cost of processing, according to Section 42-156 of the Zoning Ordinance: CS, PR, R-1, R-2, (single-family and duplex residential uses) ...................... $250.00 Piers, docks, wharves and the like, for each Variance from the ordinance, per lineal foot.................................................................... $45.00 Minimum.............................................................. $700.00 All applications for Variances relating to the same structure shall be assessed a single fee to be calculated per square foot of gross floor area of the proposed structure or addition, based upon the definition of gross floor area found in Section 2502 of Zoning Ordinance, as amended .......................................... $.10 Minimum.............................................................. $650.00 Application for Variance as a result of a change in approved plans or as a result of a violation notice shall be charged an additional fee, per Variance: CS, PR, R-1, R-2 ........................................................ $250.00 All other residential districts ............................................... $450.00 All nonresidential districts ................................................. $550.00 Extension of time for Variance .............................................. $500.00 Public hearing mail notice fees, including cost of handling and mailing per notice ......................................................................... $3.50 Surcharge equal to applicable fee from items above, not to exceed Eight Hundred Dollars ($800.00), except from agencies of the City; such surcharge to be refunded to the applicant if there is no appeal from a property owner within three hundred and seventy-five (375) feet of the subject property f 10. The Variance request is for relief from the provisions of Section 607.8 of the City of Miami Zoning Ordinance as follows: The subject property is located on 10`h Street which is designated as Brickell Promenade by the City of Miami. As such, the City has established guides,and standards which requires the creation of spacious public promenades as a pedestrian pathway from Brickell Avenue to 151 Avenue. In order to comply with the intent of the Brickell Promenade design criteria, the project is placing a greater on 10' Street which requires the movement of the entire project to the North. This has created the need for this particular variance as to the setback on 9' Street. The narrowness of the property also requires the need for the variance of setback for upper levels above 48 feet. 11. In support of the application, the applicant is prepared to offer the following evidence, on the point enumerated at Section 1903 of the City of Miami Zoning Ordinance. Note: This application cannot be accepted for Zoning Board action unless all of the following six items are completed. f (a) Special conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the land, structure, or building involved and which are not applicable to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same zoning district,in that: (list evidence to be produced and use additional sheets, if necessary.) The special conditions discussed above, were not the result of any action on the part of the petitioner; but an effort on the part of the petitioner to comply with the requirements of the Brickell Promenade standards as set forth by the City of Miami. I (b) The special conditions and circumstances do not result from the actions of the petitioner in that: A literal interpretation of 607.8 would preclude the applicant from consistency with the requirements of the City of Miami for Brickell Promenade and therefore place the applicant in an unnecessary and undue hardship position. f (c) Literal interpretation of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same zoning district under the terms of the Zoning Ordinance and would work unnecessary and undue hardships on the petitioner in that: Granting of such a variance will not confer any special privilege that is denied by the Zoning Ordinance, since in fact the Zoning Ordinance emphasizes the need for the pedestrian pathway as well • as the fulfillment of all requirements . All properties located on 10`h Street have the same or similar requirements of the Brickell Promenade Guides and Standards. d (d) Granting the Variance requested will not confer on the petitioner that special privilege that is denied by the Zoning Ordinance to other lands, buildings, or structures in the same zoning district in that: Granting of such a variance will not confer any special privilege that is denied by the Zoning Ordinance, since in fact the Zoning Ordinance emphasizes the need for the pedestrian pathway as well as the fulfillment of all requirements . All properties located on 10`h Street have the same or similar requirements of the Brickell Promenade Guides and Standards % (e) The Variance, if granted, is the minimum Variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the land, building or structure in that: The variance, if granted, is a minimum variance that would allow the reasonable use of the land and permit a design of the project consistent with the Brickell Promenade Guides and Standards as well as the requirements of pedestrian pathways in order to be consistent with the City of Miami's Downtown Master Plan in creating a friendly pedestrian ambiance at the street level and at the same time creating a spacious corridor between the Metrorail and the Metromover The grant of the Variance will be in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance, and will not be injurious to the neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare. The variance, if granted, will allow the harmony that is envisioned by the different planning documents adopted by the City of Miami in order to improve the quality of life in the neighborhood 3 60- i6o • C� and the varinace will not create any inconsistencies with the general intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance. Note: Please note that this variance is being submitted as part of a Major Use Special Permit for the Brickell Main Street Project. Signature Name A. Vickv Ga ia- oledo Esq. Address 200 South giscayne Blvd. Suite 2500 Miami, FL 33131 Phone/Fax 305-350-2409 / 305-374-7593 Date 4 UU0 0 . 0 CITY OF MIAMI Is OFFICE OF HEARING BOARDS APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTION SECTION 2-653 OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, AS AMENDED, GENERALLY REQUIRES ANY PERSON WHO RECEIVES COMPENSATION, REMUNERATION OR EXPENSES FOR CONDUCTING LOBBYING ACTIVITIES TO REGISTER AS A LOBBYIST WITH THE CITY CLERK, PRIOR TO ENGAGING IN LOBBYING ACTIVITIES BEFORE CITY STAFF, BOARDS, COMMITTEES AND THE CITY COMMISSION. A COPY OF SAID ORDINANCE IS AVAILABLE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK (MIAMI CITY HALL), LOCATED AT 3500 PAN AMERICAN DRIVE, MIAMI, FLORIDA 33133 NOTE: THIS APPLICATION MUST BE TYPEWRITTEN AND SIGNED IN BLACK INK. Within the City generally, or within certain zoning districts, certain structures, uses, and/or occupancies specified in this ordinance are of a nature requiring special and intensive review to determine whether or not they should be permitted in specific locations, and if so, the special limitations, conditions, and safeguards which should be applied as reasonably necessary promote the general purposes of this Zoning Ordinance and, in particular, to protect adjoining properties and the neighborhood from avoidable potentially adverse effects. It is further intended that the expertise and judgment of the Zoning Board be exercised in making such determinations, in accordance with the rules, considerations and limitations relating to Special Exceptions (see Article 16 of the Zoning ordinance). Formal public notice and hearing is mandatory for Special Exceptions. The Zoning Board shall be solely responsible for determinations on applications for Special Exceptions except when otherwise provided for in the city Code. All applications shall be referred to the Director of the department Planning and Development for his recommendations and the Director shall make any further referrals required by these regulations. I, Brickell Main Street, Ltd., hereby apply to the City of Miami Zoning Board for approval of a Special Exception for. the property located at South Miami Avenue between SW and S.E. 9" Street and 10* Street, folio number See Exhibit "A". Nature of Proposed Use (please be specific): Valet narking and hotel bar as accessory to a retail/hotel center. In support of this application, the following material is submitted d I . Two original surveys of the property prepared by a State of Florida Registered Land Surveyor within one year from the date of applic' ... . d 2. Four copies signed and sealed by a State of Florida Registered Architect or engineer of site plans showing (as required) property boundaries, existing (if any) and proposed structure(s), parking, landscaping, etc.; building elevations and dimensions and computations of lot area and building spacing. f 3. Affidavits disclosing ownership of property covered by applications and disclosure of interest from (attached to application). f 4. Certified list of owners of real estate within a 375 -foot radius of the outside boundaries of property covered by the application. d 5. At least two photographs that show the entire property (land and improvements). • • f 6. Recorded warranty deed and ax forms for the most current year available that show the present owner(s) of the property. 7. Other (Specify and attach cover letters explaining why any document you are attaching is pertinent to this application). d 8. Fee of $ to apply toward the cost of processing according to Section 62-156 of the Zoning Ordinance: Special Exception (Fees are inclusive in MUSP fee) - $ 800.00 Special Exception requiring automatic city commission review - $2,000.00 Extension of time for special exception - $ 500.00 Public hearing mail notice fees, including cost of handling and mailing per notice - $ 3.50 Surcharge equal to applicable fee from item above, not to exceed eight hundred dollars ($800.00) except from agencies of the city; such surcharge to be refunded to the applicant if there is not appeal from a property owner within three of the subject property. Signature Name Address Phone/Fax Date STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE 305-350-2409 / 305-374-7593 lik The foregoinginstrumentwasacknowledgedbeforemethis day ofNovember, 1999, by Vicky Garcia -Toledo, Esq. who is personally known to me " Et1TA6EtH MAt1Clit�llt Name: El. tal„ Iiaarclsra MY COMMtSSI M 1 CC 81588f Notary Public -State of Florida EXPIRES: Apps 18, 20M Commission No.: CC 4 11'T Q 4 a01di°TM"^ti10Y1"'"0'" My Commission Expires: l o s is J • AFFIDAVIT STATE OF FLORIDA } } SS COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE } • H. Leland Taylor Before me, the undersigned authority, this day personally appeared , who being by me first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and says: That he/she is the owner, or the legal representative of the owner, submitting the accompanying application for a public hearing as required by the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, affecting the real property located in the City of Miami, as described and listed on the pages attached to this Affidavit and made a part thereof. 2. That all owners which he/she represents, if any, have given their full and complete permission for him/her to act in his/her behalf for the change or modification of a classification or regulation of zoning as set out in the accompanying petition. 3. That the pages attached hereto and made a part of this affidavit contain the current names, mailing addresses, telephone numbers and legal descriptions for the real property of which he/she is the owner or legal representative. 4. The facts as represented in the application and documents submitted in conjunction with this 1000 Brickell, Ltd., a Florida Limited Partnership affidavit are true and correct. By: Hamm d nture, Inc., Its General Partner Further Affiant sayeth not. By: H. I,lelan aylor, Vice President 3dmttmt sueraiee<. STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAN 1 -DADS• The: foreg ing.. instrument was acknowledged before me this A CL day of �� r -Ta , 199q, by H. Leland Taylor, as Vice President of Hamond Venture, Inc., as General Partner of 1000 Brickell Ltd, on behalf of the* He/She is persoy known to me or ,Pqhas produced 0 1Q as identification and (did not) take an oath. *Limited Partnership Name: Notary Public -State of Florida: Commission No.:Woa.iftAnowu.c+.w My Commission Expires: * �cam•W+CCMr MOM Memb u, 2= �3 ICS, 5 is • DISCLOSURE OF OWNERSHIP 1. Legal description and street address of subject real property: See attached Exhibit "B" 2. Owner(s) of subject real Property and percentage of ownership. Note: Section 2-618 of the Code of the City of Miami requires disclosure of all parties having a financial interest, either direct or indirect in the subject matter of a presentation, request or petition to the City Commission. Accordingly, question 92 requires disclosure of shareholders of corporations, beneficiaries of trusts, and/or any other interested parties, together with their addresses and proportionate interest. See attached Exhibit "C" 3. Legal description and street address of any real property (a) owned by any party listed in answer to question 42, and (b) located within 375 feet of the subject real property. 1000 Brickell, Ltd., a Florida Limited Partnership See attached Exhibit "D" By: H d nture, In s Sole Partner By! H. Veland taylor, Vice President 9f*TE 9F ,19 , by H. Leland Taylor of Hamond Venture, as Vice Prime 0 1000 Brickell Ltd corporation, on behalf of the corporation. He/She is personally kno oTne or has produced as identification an i (did not) take an oath. Name: Notary Public -State of Florida Commission No.: STATE OF FLORID/L ` COUNTY OF MIAMI—DADR e foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this Ati-day of 19q ;1 by H. Leland Taylor, as Vice President of Hammond Venture, I c., the General Partner of 1000 Brickell, Ltd., on behalf of th Limited Partner i He is personally known to me or has produced 1 2a id t ication and "did not) take an oath. Notary Public — State -of Florida - Commission No.: My Commission Expires: WfMft 0' IOY AAGON MAN i4*W Cmr� c:c81r= X.y Ewm l - " 14.=M 0 OWNER'S LIST Owner's Name: -1000 Brickell Ltd. Mailing Address: c/o Vicky Garcia -Toledo, Esq., 200 So: Biscayne Blvd., Suite 2500, Miami, FL 33131 with copy to: Lynn R. T.Pwis. P -A_, 1390 RrickelI Ayenrnp, Snirp 2RQ Miami, FL 3313 Telephone Number: 305-350-2409 (V. Garcia -Toledo) : 305-374-0148 (Lynn Lewis) Legal Description: See attached Exhibit "B" Owner's Name: N/A Mailing Address: Telephone Number. Legal Description: Owner's Name: N/A Mailing Address: Telephone Number. Legal Description: Any other real estate property owned individually, jointly or severally (by corporation, partnership or privately) within 375 feet of the subject site is listed as follows: Street Address Legal Description See attached Exhibit "D" • E)(Mff "B" Lot 1, less the West 50 feet thereof, and the South''/2 of Lot 2, less the West 50 feet thereof, in Block72, of South, City of Miami, according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book "B" at Page 41, of the. Public Records of Miami -Dade County; 916-918 S.E. Miami Avenue Lot 18, Block 71of South, City of Miami according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book "B" at Page 41; of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County; 55 S.W. 10 Street The North half ('/z) of Lot 2, less the West 50 feet thereof, and all of Lot 3, less the West 50 feet thereof in Block 72, South, City of Miami, according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book "B" at Page 41, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County; 900 S.E. Miami Avenue Lots 5, 6, 7, 9, 16, all of Lots 17 and 20, Block 71, City of Miami South; Plat Book "B", Page 41; 36 S.W. 9 Street; 50 S.W. 9 Street; 62-64 S.W. 9 Street; 59 S.W. 10 Street; 57 S.W. 10 Street; 29 S.W. 10 Street West 75 feet of Lot 9 and an undivided one-half ('/z) interest in Lot 9 less the West 75 feet thereof, Block 72, South, City of Miami, Plat Book "B" at Page 41; 926 -928 S.E. 1" Avenue Lot 21, in Block 71 of S. of MAP OF MIANQ CO., FLA, a subdivision, according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book B at Page 41 of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida; 25 S.W. 10 Street Lot 8, Block 71, South, City of Miami, according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book "B" at Page 41 of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida, 60 S.W. 9 Street Lot 4, Block 71, South; City of Miami according to the Plat Bok thereof, as recorded in Plat Book B, Page 41, of the Public Records of Miami -Dada County, Florida 26 S.W. 9 Street : The East 26 feet of Lot 15, Block 71 South, City of Miami according to the Plat Bok thereof, as recorded in Plat Book B, Page 41, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida The East 28 feet of the West 125 feet of Lot15, Block 71 South, City of Miami according to the Plat Bok thereof, as recorded in Plat Book B, Page 41, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County; Florida ti- 100 EXHIBIT "C" Disclosure for 1000 Brickell Avenue (a) 33.601803% by Ida Akers Morris, W. Allen Morris and James F. Bell, Trustees under the L. Allen Morris Trust Agreement dated May 15, 1982. The Beneficiaries under this Trust and their respective beneficial interests under the Trust are: (1) Ida Aker Morris, Life Estate, 100% (2) Ida Morris Bell, 33.33% Remainder Interest (3) Kathryn C. Morris Rupp, 33.33% Remainder Interest (4) W. Allen Morris, 33.33% Remainder Interest (b) 20.798884% by W. Allen Morris and Diane Yohe Morris, Trustees under the W. Allen Morris Trust Agreement dated March 29, 1983. The Beneficiary under this Trust and his beneficial interest under the Trust is: (1) W. Allen Moms, 100% (c) 20.743866% by Kathryn C. Morris Rupp, Trustee under the Kathryn C. Morris Rupp Thirty (30) Year Trust. The Beneficiary under this Trust and her beneficial interest under the Trust is: (1) Kathryn C, Moms Rupp, 100% (d) 10.555327% by Ida Morris Bell (e) 5.094270% by James Frank Bell, III (i) 5.094270% by William Allen Bell (g) 3.111580% by Ida Kathryn Bell (h) 1 % by Hammond Venture, Inc., General Partner. The following are the owners of Hammond Venture, Inc., a Georgia corporation authorized to do business in Florida: (1) 52% by Ida Akers Morris, W. Allen Morris and James F. Bell, Trustees under the L. Allen Morris Trust Agreement dated May 15, 1982. See 2(a) above for beneficiaries under the Trust. (2) 10.50% by W. Allen Morris and Diane Yohe Morris, Trustees under the W. Allen Morris Trust Agreement dated March 29, 1983. See 2(b) above for beneficiary under the Trust. (3) 12.50% by Kathryn C. Morris Rupp, Trustee under the Kathryn C. Morris Rupp Thirty (30) Year Trdst~' (e) above for beneficiary under the Trust, (4) 12.6% bj -James F. Bell, Jr. (5) 12.5% by Ida Morris Bell, III: The following are the officers and directors of Hammond Venture, Inc. (a)- James F. Bell, Jr., President/Director (b) W. Allen Morris, Vice President/Director (c) Gary L. Rupp, Vice President/Director- (d) H. Leland. Taylor, Vice President/Director (e) Bill C. Davis, Secretary/Treasurer/Director (f) Diane C. Collins, Assistant Secretary (g) Eileen B. Roe, Assistant Secretary (h) Judith McKelvey Walker, Assistant Secretary. is Exhibit "D" W 20 feet of Lots 2 & 3, all of Lots 4, 5, 6 and 7, Block 55, South City of Miami, Plat Book "B", Page 41, Lots 8 and 9, Block 55, South City of Miami, Plat Book "B", Page 41 Lot 20, Block 56, South City of Miami, Plat Book "B", Page 41 N 50 feet of Lots 22, 23 & 24, Block 56, South City of Miami, Plat Book "B", Page 41 S 50 feet of Lots 1, 2 & 3, and N 50 feet of Lots 23 & 24, Block 74, South City of Miami, Plat Book "B", Page 41 Lot 4, Block 74, South City of Miami, Plat Book "B", Page 41 Lot 5 & S 50 feet of Lot 6, Block 74, South City of Miami, Plat Book "S", Page 41 N 100 feet of Lot 6, Block 74, South City of Miami, Plat Book "B", Page 41 Lot 7, Block 74, South City of Miami, Plat Book "B", Page 41 Lot 8, Block 74, South City of Miami, Plat Book "B", Page 41 N 100 feet of Lot 9, Block 74, South City of Miami, Plat Book Page 41 N 10 feet of Lot 11, W 61.5 feet of Lot 10, Block 74, South City of Miami, Plat Book "B", Page 41 E 33.5 feet of W 95 feet of Lot 10 and of Lot 11, Block 74, South City of Miami, Plat Book "B", Page 41 E 30 feet of Lot 10 and E 30 feet of N 10 feet of Lot 11, Block 74, South City of Miami, Plat Book "B", Page 41 E 50 feet of Lots .14&-15, Blocks 74; Sou&City of Miami, Plat Book "B", Page: 41 Lot 16, Block 74, South -City., of Miami, Plat Book "B", Page 41 Lot 17, Block 74; South City of Miami, Plat Book "B", Page 41 • :er Lines of Brickell Main Stret 801 S. Miami Ave 827 S. Miami Ave 35 SW 9 St 824 S. Miami Ave 1024 S. Miami Ave 28-30 SW 10 St 34-36 SW 10 St 38 SW 10 St 50 SW 10 St 62 SW 10 St 68 SW 10 St 88&94 SW 10 St 84 SW 10 St 74 SW 10 St 75 5 W l l St 59 SW 11 St 69 SW 11 St Lot 18, Block 74, South City o£Miami, Plat Book "B", Page 41 51 SW 11 St Lots 19 & 20, Block 74, South City of Miami, Plat Book "B", Page 41 47 SW 11 St Lots 1, 2, 3, 4 and Lots 22, 23, 24 & 25, Blk 100S, Mary Brickell's 1000 Brickell Ave Addition, Plat Book "B", Page 113 ALL PLAT BOOK REFERENCES ARE TO THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF MIAMI -DADS COUNTY, FLORIDA 9 AFFIDAVIT STATE OF FLORIDA ® } } SS COUNTY OF MIAMI -DARE } Before me, the undersigned authority, this day personally appeared Fittipaldi Executive Center Inc. who being by me first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and says: That he/she is the owner, or the legal representative of the owner, submitting the accompanying application for a public hearing as required by the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, affecting the real property located in the City of Miami, as described and listed on the pages attached to this Affidavit and made a part thereof. 2. That all owners which he/she represents, if any, have given their full and complete permission for him/her to act in his/her behalf for the change or modification of a classification or regulation of zoning as set out in the accompanying petition. That the pages attached hereto and made a part of this affidavit contain the current names, mailing addresses, telephone numbers and legal descriptions for the real property of which he/she is the owner or legal representative. 4. The facts as represented in the application and documents submitted in conjunction with this affidavit are true and correct. Further Affiant sayeth not. Daniel Goodstadt , Vice President STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI -DARE The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of OC +0 ber- , 19-93 by Daniel Goodstadt, Vice President of Fittipaldi Executive Center, Inc. a Florida corporation, on behalf of the corporation. ®She is personally known to me or has produced 'Fl. -n (n e r.5 k.- i Le el S -e as identification d who did (did not) take an oath. Name: Notary Public -State of Florida Commission No.: My Commission Expires: D[SCLOSURE OF OWNERS 1. Legal description and street address of subject real property: Lots 1 and 2, B',ock 71, South, City of Miami, Plat Book "B", Page 41; Lots 22, 23 and 24, Block 71, South, City 41 of Miami, Plat Book "B", Page 41; The West 50 feet of Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 72, South, City of Miami, Plat Book "B", Page 41; Lots 4 and 5, Block 72, South, City of Miami, Plat Book "B", Page 41. 900 So. Miami Avenue; 920 So. Miami Avenue; 1 S.W. 10 Street; 10 S.E. 9 Street; 901 So. Miami Avenue 2. Owner(s) of subject real Property and percentage of ownership. Note: Section 2-618 of the Code of the City of Miami requires disclosure of all parties having a financial interest, either direct or indirect in the subject matter of a presentation, request or petition to the City Commission. Accordingly, question #2 requires disclosure of shareholders of corporations, beneficiaries of trusts, and/or any other interested parties, together with their addresses and proportionate interest. Fittipaldi Executive Center, Inc. owned by: Emerson Fittipaldi as sole stockholder of the corporation 3. Legal description and street address of any real property (a) owned by any party listed in answer to question #2, and (b) located within 375 feet of the subject real property. N/A Daniel Goodstal, Vice President STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF NUANH-DARE The foregoing instrument w,gs acknowledged before me this � day of 194`7, by Daniel Goodstadt, Vice President of Fittipaldi Executive Center, Inc., a Florida coreoratiol on behalf of the corporation. He/She is personally known to. me or has produced F�►• r\ i -S L-1 CBl'iS C as identification and who did (did not) take an oath. Name: Notary Public -State of Florida Commission No.: My Commission Expires: • • OWNER'S LIST Ownees Name: L' Mailing Address: c/o Vicky Garcia -Toledo Esq., 200 So Biscayne Blvd Suite 2500 Miami FL 33131 Telephone Number: 305-350-2409 Legal Description: Lots 1 and 2, Block 71, South, City of Miami, Plat Book "B", Page 41; Lots 22, 23 and 24, Block 71, South, City of Miami, Plat Book "B", Page 41; The West 50 feet of Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 72, South, Cityof Miami, Plat Book "B", Page 41; Lots 4 and 5, Block 72, South, City of Miami, Plat Book "B", Page 41. 900 So. -Miami Avenue; 920 So. Miami Avenue; 1 S.W. 10 Street; 10 S.E. 9 Street; 901 So. Miami Avenue Owners Name: N/A Mailing Address: Telephone Number. Legal Description: Owner's Name: N/A Mailing Address: Telephone Number. Legal Description: Any other real estate property owned individually, jointly or severally (by corporation, partnership or privately) within 375 feet of the subject site is listed as follows: Street Address Legal Description • • 40 AFFIDAVIT STATE OF FLORIDA } . } SS COUNTY OF MIAMI -DARE } Before me, the undersigned authority, this day personally appeared Edward and Lena Movlan who being by me first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and says: 1. That he/she is the owner, or the legal representative of the owner, submitting the accompanying application for a public hearing as required by the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, affecting the real property located in the City of Miami, as described and listed on the pages attached to this Affidavit and made a part thereof. 2. That all owners which he/she represents, if any, have given their full and complete permission for him/her to act in his/her behalf for the change or modification of a classification or regulation of zoning as set out in the accompanying petition. 3. That the pages attached hereto and made a part of this affidavit contain the current names, mailing addresses, telephone numbers and legal descriptions for the real property of which he/she is the owner or legal representative. 4. The facts as represented in the application and documents submitted in conjunction with this affidavit are true and correct. Further Affiant sayeth not. STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF Lou) mowledgedbefore methiSAX day of ��_� O bfee� 199 byEdwardN. Moylan has produced as identification and who (did not) take an oath. % •. •.� i ,, 7653.. Jii,i: anle: o ' w�` I W. �"` Notary blit tate of Florida f AACI u. r—A &IR— ii�,'9i' •:�,'•••�Q„�y Commission No.: � �yw `� STAL Z My Commission Expires: �II/If1111110N��a STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI -DADS ih Tl�p ieregain was acknowledged before me this day of t 19 by Lena H. Moylan d iehe is personally known tome has produced.........� _ �a identification and who did (did not) take an oath. _.e .. Nk*: :V Notary Pu ondli'IE---- • / Commissio _ S •. � My CommisA1r-xpi4:7tlassn :.. C7 0 DISCLOSURE OF OWNER 1. Legal description and street address of subject real property: Lot 19 Block 71, South, City of Miami, Plat Book "B", Page 41; 41, 43, 45 and 47 S.W. 10 Street 2. Owner(s) of subject real Property and percentage of ownership. Note: Section 2-618 of the Code of the City of Miami requires disclosure of all parties having a financial interest, either direct or indirect in the subject matter of a presentation, request or petition to the City Commission. Accordingly, question #2 requires disclosure of shareholders of corporations, beneficiaries of trusts, and/or any other interested parties, together with their addresses and proportionate interest. Edward and Lena Moylan 100% 3. Legal description and street address of any real property (a) owned by any party listed in answer to question #2, and (b) located within 375 feet of the subject real property. N/A Edwar6N. Moylan ' H.. Moylah STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE Liforegoing instrument was acWOW"., before me this 2,� day of is personally own mi as az ro �� �,v►ssio . o a°y�?o Oyu a *' N• _Notary Pub is -State of Florida OM 7W&V Q$ Commission NO.: ��'• aha mN„�a: �R My Commission Expires: STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI -DADS The fo oiAg +as+*=+ aclmowledged before me this 2 'day 4qSfie is personally known to me has produced �1 Notary Public tee of Florida Commission o.: My Commission Expires:. 19'4, by Edward N. Moylan . and who did (did not) take an oath. NAAlL ku )tZ7R&f`2 •2 19 1'',q, by Lena H. Moylan. and who did (did not) take an oath. 49 • • OWNER'S LIST I* Owner's Name: Edward N Moylan and Lena H. Moylan, his wife Mailing Address: c/o Vicky Garcia -Toledo Esq., 200 So Biscayne Blvd., Suite 2500, Miami, FL 33131 Telephone Number: 305-350-2409 Legal Description: Lot 19 Block 71, South, City of Miami, Plat Book "B", Page 41; 41, 43, 45 and 47 S.W. 10 Street Owners Name: N/A Mailing. Address: Telephone Number. Legal Description: Owner's Name: N/A Mailing Address: Telephone Number Legal Description: Any other real estate property owned individually, jointly or severally (by corporation, partnership or privately) within 375 feet of the subject site is listed as follows: Street Address N/A Legal Description • • 9 0 AFFIDAVIT STATE OF FLORIDA } } SS COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE } Before me, the undersigned authority, this day personally appeared Brickell Main Street. Ltd. who being by me first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and says: That he/she is the owner, or the legal representative of the owner, submitting the accompanying application for a public hearing as required by the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, affecting the real property located in the City of Miami, as described and listed on the pages attached to this Affidavit and made a part thereof. 2. That all owners which he/she represents, if any, have given their full and complete permission for him/her to act in his/her behalf for the change or modification of a classification or regulation of zoning as set out in the accompanying petition. 3. That the pages attached hereto and made a part of this affidavit contain the current names, mailing addresses, telephone numbers and legal descriptions for the real property of which he/she is the owner or legal representative. 4. The facts as represented in the application and documents submitted in conjunction with this affidavit are true and correct. Further Affiant sayeth not. Vicky Garcia -Toledo, Attorney for Brickell Poin Street, Ltd. STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of / V,,/,.,a, 1.m, 19", by Vicky Garcia -Toledo, Esq., attorney for Brickell Main Street, Ltd. , on behalf of the corporation. She is personally known to me or has produced fs identification aTi yvho did (did not) take an oath. W COMMS" 0 CC 78M Name: EMAE :N".66 9, Notary Public -State of Florida �nwnarao.u.e.�p Commission No.: My Commission Expires: O1.9` S 0 DISCLOSURE OF OWNER) 1. Legal description and street address of subject real property: Lot 3, Block 71, South, City of Miami, Plat Book "B", Page 4.1; 20 S.W. 9 Street 2. Owner(s) of subject real Property and percentage of ownership. Note: Section 2-618 of the Code of the City of Miami requires disclosure of all parties having a financial interest, either direct or indirect in the subject matter of a presentation, request or petition to the City Commission. Accordingly, question #2 requires disclosure of shareholders of corporations, beneficiaries of trusts, and/or any other interested parties, together with their addresses and proportionate interest. See attached Exhibit "E" 3. Legal description and street address of any real property (a) owned by any party listed in answer to question #2, and (b) located within 375 feet of the subject real property. N/A Attorney for er, Vicky Garcia -Toledo, Esq. STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF WAMI-DADS / The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of Yed 19 by Vicky Garcia -Toledo, Esq., attorney for Brickell Main Street, Ltd., on behalf of the corporation. She is personally known to me or has produced as identification and who did (did not) take an oath. L b.1MobP AS" i CC 78M -NW4Wh ►9.2W2 mm" - Ap" Name: (/ Notary Public -State of Florida Commission No.: My Commission Expires: GO- • 0 OWNER'S LIST Owner's Nam Mailing Address: c/o Vicky Garcia -Toledo Es4 200 So Biscayne Blvd., Suite 2500, Miami, FL 33131 Telephone Number: 305-350-2409 Legal Description: . Lot 3, Block 71, South, City of Miami, Plat Book "B", Page 41 20 S.W. 9 Street Owner's Name: N/A Mailing Address: Telephone Number: Legal Description: Owner's Name: N/A Mailing Address: Telephone Number. Legal Description: Any other real estate property owned individually, jointly or severally (by corporation, partnership or privately) within 375 feet of the subject site is listed as follows: Street Address Legal Description N/A N/A Disclosure for: • EXHIBIT "E" Brickell Main Street, Ltd. (f/k/a Brickell Walk, Ltd.) owned by: General Partner: Brickell Main Street Management, Ltd. a Florida limited partnership Limited Partners: Constructa, Inc., a Delaware corporation Brickell Investors, Inc., a Florida corporation Emerson Fittipaldi, as an individual Brickell Main Street Management, Ltd owned by: Brickell Main Street Management, LL.C., a Florida limited liability company Constructa, Inc., a Delaware corporation Brickell Investors, Inc., a Florida corporation Emerson Fittipaldi, as an individual Constructa, Inc., a Delaware corporation owned by: Constructa, US, Inc., a Delaware corporation 100% Brickell Investors, Inc., a Florida corporation owned by: Mario Garnero 100% Emerson Fittipaldi as an individual 100% 1� 0 GADMS\72343\12084\0262688.01 10/12/1999 C. 0 ` x. 8 81 • Continued EXHIBIT "E"® Constructa U.S., Inc. Corporate Information Employer ID Number 52-1482952 Organized Delaware 06/06/1988 Authoritlto Act Authority to Act FL 04/17/1987 Shareholder Information Owner/Interest% Bellechasse, S.A. 75.00% Owner/Interest% Novafuture * 3.57% Owner/Interest% Sofmad* 14.29% Owner/Interest% Banque National de Paris* 7.14% Owner/Interest% Total Interests held 100.00% Stock Information Total Interests Authorized 35,000 Par Value per Interest $ 1.00 Director/Officer Information Executive/Title(s) Marc Pietri (Bellechasse) Director, President Executive/Title(s) Dominique Chatillon (Bellechasse) Director Executive/Title(s) Jean -Pascal Tranie (Bellechasse) Director • Executive/Title(s) Claude -Eric Paquin (Bellechasse) Director Executive/Title(s) Alain Mallart (Bellechasse) Director Executive/Title(s) Dominique Picon Director Executive/Title(s) J. Ducros Director Executive/Title(s) Rene Tendron Advisory Director Executive/Title(s) Jean -Jacques de Flers Advisory Director Executive/Title(s) Jean -Marc Meunier Vice President Executive/Title(s) Eric Fazilleau Vice President, Secretary Executive/Title(s) Andrew Kwiat Treasurer * Publicly traded companies in France GADM&72343N 12084\0262688.01 10/1V1999. • U Ca Ll • ® Continued EXIT "E"® BELLECHASSE S.A. mise A jour apres cession N°53 FORME JURIDIQUE 0 LORIx►�I.'I0 OBJET SOCIAL CAPITAL COMPOSITION DU CAPITAL N°REGISTRE COMMERCE PARIS CREATION N° REGISTRE DU COMMERCE MARSIELLE DUREE DE LA SOCIETE DATE IMMATRICULATION ANNONCE DE LA CONSTITUTION N ° SIRET CODE A.P.E. Pr6sident Directeur G6n6ral Societe Anonyme 73, rue de Miromasnil A compter du 1 I mars 1996 75008 PARIS Marchande de biens, prise de participations 24,225,000 Francs 85,000 actions de 285 Francs 94 BO 9248 87 B 798 50 ans 19 mars 1985 au RCS d'Antibes 2 Grier 1985 332 235 423 00065 701 F Monaleur Marc PIETRI (3 Janvier 91) ACTIONNAIRES % Date d'ac uisition Date Nombre Marc PIETRI 4.29 Cr6ation 28/9/99 3,650 Rozann PIETRI 0.00 12/01/1990 R6s 2002 1 Bellechassee Inveatiaaement 89.64 05/17/1995 ###ate## 76,197 C.D.E. 2.94 05/01/1991 2,500 St6phana RICHARD 0.00 05/03/1996 1 Claude Eric PAQUIN 0.00 07/10/1997 1 Dominique CHATILLON 0.12 l2/01/1990 100 S.D.R.M. 300 01/01/1993 2,550 luU CONSEIL D'ADNO ISTRATION: Prbsident du Consiel: Renvimmt CA du 3/11/97 pour dur6e Idem Dominique CHATILLON - Comptoir des Entrepreneurs. repr6sentbe par Bernard SOUBRANE Rozann PIETRI Claude Eric PAQUIN St6phane RICHARD COMMISSAIRE AUX COMPTES Cabinet MAZAR ET GUERARD SUPPLEANT Monsieur Philippe BOUII.LET GAWS\72343F12084\0262688.01 10/12/1999 Marc PM'M 85,000 Date mandat Renouv. 06/23/1997 R6s 2002 06/23/1997 R6s 2002 06/23/1997 R6s 2002 06/23/1997 R6s 2002 07/25/1997 R6s 2002 -06/291997 R6s 2002 06/23/1997 R6s 2002 06/23/1997 1 R6s 2002 U ® BRICKELL MAIN STREET 0 DIRECTORY OF PROJECT PRINCIPALS Owner/Development: Brickell Main Street, Ltd. 2665 S. Bayshore Drive, Suite 302 Coconut Grove, Florida 33133 Telephone: (305) 858-7749 Fax: (305)859-7579 Contact Person: George Giebel Architect: Beanie Architectural Partnership 116 Alhambra Circle,,Suite J Coral Gables, Florida 33134 Telephone: (305) 444-7100 Fax: (305)444-9803 Mr. Larry Beame Ms. Olga Pizzi-Garcia Ms. Katie Salow Landscape Architect: Ecoplan 1515 S.W. 4' Avenue Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33316 Telephone: (954) 524-3722 Fax: (954)524-1529 Philip Bogdal Richard Hallock Traffic: Carr Smith Corradino 5200 N.W. 33' Avenue Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33309 Telephone: (954) 777-0044 Fax: (954)777-5157 ® T. Imada, PE, PTOE Economist: Sharpton Brunson &c Company 1 S.E. 31 Avenue Suite 2100 Miami, FL 33131 Telephone: (305) 374-1574 Fax: (305)372-8161 Mr. Darryl Sharpton Legal: Bilzin Sumberg Dunn Price &t Axelrod 2500 First Union Financial Center 200 South Biscayne Boulevard Miami, Florida 33131 -2336 - Telephone: (305) 374-7580 . Fax: (305)374-7593 A. Vicky Garcia -Toledo, Esq. G:\DMS\72343\12084\0262688.01 10/12/1999 BRICKELL MAIN STREET Project Data Sheet • SITE: South Miami Avenue between S.W. 9'h and 10" Street Miami, Florida • LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See Exhibit "A" under Article t • SITE ZONING: SD -7 As described by Article VI, Sec. 607 (SD -7 Central Brickell Rapid Transit Commercial -Residential District) of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida. • PERMITTED USES: As described by Article VI, Section 607 (SD -7 Central Brickell Rapid Transit Commercial -Residential District) of the Zoning Ordinance for the City of Miami, Florida, the permitted uses include but are not limited to retail establishments along ground floor of pedestrian streets; multiple dwellings; hotels; and parking • DENSITY: Residential Density for Hotel Uses As per Article VI, Sec. 607, the number of dwellings is determined by a maximum net density of 500 units per acre. Allowed: 5.7 acres x 500 units per acre = 2,850 units maximum) Proposed: 288 Hotel Units (equivalent to 144 residential units) • NET LOT AREA: 180,436 s.f. or 4.1 acres • GROSS LOT AREA: 247,470 s.f. or 5.7 acres. • BUILDING FOOTPRINT: Max Permitted; As described in Article VI Sec. 607: Unlimited Proposed:: 110,380 s.£ GADMM12343\12084\0262688.01 10/12/1999 0 • F.A.R.: Max. Permitted: • For Residential: For Non -Residential As described in Article VI, Sec. 607: As described in Article VI, Sec. 607 Base F.A.R. 6.0 times the gross lot area: Base FAR 2.25 times the gross lot area: 247,470 s.f. x 6.0= 1,484,820 s.f. 247,470 s.f. x 2.25= 556,880 s.f. For Hotel For Non -Residential Proposed: 197,560 s.f Proposed: 197,380 s.f. • OPEN SPACE: Minimum Required: As required by Article VI, Sec. 607 - 3468 sq. feet Proposed: 24,100 s.f • SETBACKS: Required: As required by Article VI, Sec. 607, the minimum setbacks are as follows: Front: S. Miami Avenue - 12'-0" Side: 10 Street - 12'-0" Side: 9 Street - 15'-0" Side: SE V Street - 15'-0" Provided: Front: S. Miami Avenue - 12'-0" Side: 10 Street - 1T-0" • Side: 9 Street - 5'-0" Side SE 1st Avenue 151-011 Variance will be requested as part of this Major Use Special Permit application for setbacks on 9 Street and setback for garage above 48'-0" of elevation • PARKING: Required: As required by Article VI, Sec. 607 and Article 9, Section 917, 918, 922 and 923 of the Zoning Ordinance of City of Miami, Florida, the amount of required parking is as follows: Proposed: 1,040 parking spaces, inclusive of 21 spaces for the physically disabled._ • OFFSTREET LOADING Required: As required by Article IX, Sec. 923, offstreet loading requirements for buildings in excess of 25,000 s.f. and up to 500,000 s.f. of gross building area the number of required berths shall be as follows: Berth minimum dimension 12'x 35' Number of berths required - 4 Proposed: 2 berths at 12' x 35' 2 berth at 10'x 25' (market service) G:\DMS\7V43\12084\0262688.01 10/12/1999 C7 • MAX. BUILDIPHEIGHT: Allowed: Unlimited Proposed : Retail: 2 levels 30'-0" Hotel• 12 levels 120"-0" Upper Parking: 7 levels 63'-0" Subgrade Parking: I level 9'-0" • 0:\DMS\72343\ 12084\0262688.01 10/12/1999 • BRICKELL MAIN STREET MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT • PROJECT DESCRIPTION ARTICLE H. Description A. Zoning Ordinance No. 11000 1. Section 1304.2.1 Application forms; supplementary materials 2. Section 1702.2.1 General Report 3. Section 1702.2.2 Major Use Special Permit Concept Plan • ® G:\DMS\72343\12084\0262688.01 10/12/1999 • n Zoning Ordinance No. 11000 r� u BRICKELL MAIN STREET MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT PROJECT DESCRIPTION 11. Section 1304.2.1 Application forms; supplementary materials (a) Statement of ownership and control of the proposed development of activity. The Disclosure of Ownership and Ownership Affidavit are provided in Article I. (b) Statement describing in detail the character and intended use of the development of activity. Brickell Main Street is proposed as a mixed use project composed of 2 levels of retail on both sides of South Miami Avenue with 9' Street to the North and 10' Street to the South of the project. At the west end of the project, there is a seven level parking deck and a 288 unit hotel tower above. The project also encompasses at its easternmost end facing Brickell Plaza Way/SE I" Avenue a 1500 s.f. Community Building surrounded by lush vegetation and complimenting the Allen Morris City of Miami Park directly to the South. The project has been envisioned as a leisure and lifestyle center catering to the needs of home, family and community. The tenant mix will be focused to the Brickell Village lifestyle by offering restaurants, retail goods and services which are specific to the needs of the consumer who seeks superior quality within a relaxing shopping and dining experience and at close proximity to their home. The project is a series of two story buildings designed around formal and informal public spaces where one will be able to stroll through a formal garden surrounded by restaurants and outdoor cafes. Brickell Main Street is seen as a service core for the residents of Brickell Village and it attempts to create a pedestrian friendly environment with its many open public plazas. Amongst the open spaces will be an amphitheater like area which has been designed around a fountain feature and which will act as a focal point for public concerts and "brown -bag" lunches. At the opposite end of the project, on the easternmost side, will be the community building which has been designed for formal weddings and community functions adjacent to an existing urban park. The retail center will be served by underground parking as well as an adjoining parking deck that will supply the required parking for both the retail and hotel in the amount of 1,040 parking spaces. Atop the parking deck will be a 288 room hotel. The Brickell Main Street project will front on, South Miami Avenue and SW 10' Street known as "Brickell Promenade". Special emphasis will be placed by the project design to create a spacious promenade to enhance the City of Miami's desire .in developing the Brickell Promenade Design Development Plan and Urban Design. Guidelines.. This project will emphasize and activate the pedestrian pathways identified by the City for the Brickell Promenade and will add to the ambiance that has.begun to develop in the Brickell Village area. The location of the project on both sides of South Miami Avenue with a pedestrian bridge . at the second level and the Community Building on SE I' Avenue are envisioned as a design element that identifies Main Street as the activity center of neighborhood life for Brickell Village. A pedestrian bridge 16 feet above South Miami Avenue will serve not only as a signature element 0 G:\DMS\72343\12084\0262688.01 . 10/12/1999 U- 181 of the project but will also allow safe and efficient movement of pedestrian visiting the second story of the retail center. (c) General location map, showing relation of the site or activity for which special permit is sought to major streets, schools, existing utilities, shopping areas, important physical features in and adjoining the project or activity and the like.. The following exhibits are included with the Major Use Special Permit Application and are located under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (i) Location Map: Map of the surrounding street system indicating the project location. (ii) Area Context Map: Map of the project area indicating buildup in the surrounding area. (iii) Aerial: Aerial Photograph of the surrounding area indicating the project site. (d) A site plan containing the title of the project and the names of the project planner and developer, date, and north arrow and, based on an exact survey of the property drawn to a scale of sufficient size to show: The Site plan is located as Sheet A1.01 under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. Boundaries of the project, any existing streets, building, watercourses, easements and section lines; The boundaries of the project and the location of existing streets are shown on the survey located under Tab 5 of the. Supporting Documents. ii. Exact location of all buildings and structures; The exact location of all existing buildings located on the Property is shown on the survey located under Tab 5 of the Supporting Documents. The location of the building to be constructed are shown on the Site Plan, under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. iii. Access and traffic flow and how vehicular traffic will be separated from pedestrian and other types of traffic; A detailed analysis of the site access and traffic flow for the development is provided in the Traffic Impact Analysis located under Tab 2 of the Supporting Documents. Vehicularaccess for visitors and hotel guests will occur via driveways at the west end of the property from SW 91 and 10"' Street. Valet parking will be provided on both 9' and 10" Streets - Service vehicles will access the loading docks from the service entrance. (1) Off-street parking and off-street loading. area; Off-street parking will be provided within the 1 subgrade level parking garage and 7 levels of upper parking deck. All levels will be accessed by the ramps located off two main entrances located at the west end of project on SW 10th Street and SW 9h Street. 0 G:\DMS\72343\12084\0262688.01 10/12/1999 (2) Recreational Facilities; Recreational facilities for the hotel will be provided on a recreational area accessible from. the hotel tower. (3) Screens and buffers; Landscaping areas are indicated on the Landscape Plan, under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (4) Refuse collections areas; Waste collection will be provided by a containerized compactor system located in the service area. These facilities are shown on the Ground Floor Plan under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (5) Access to utilities and points of utilities hookups. Access and connections to site utilities are discussed in the Site Utility Study located under Tab 3 of the Supporting Documents (e) Tabulations of total gross acreage in the project and the percentages thereof proposed to be devoted to the permitted uses and ground coverage. 247,470 gross square feet 5.7 gross acres i. The various permitted uses. Maximum permitted footprint There is no restriction as to the maximum footprint in SD -7 Proposed: Building Footprint: 110,380 gross square feet ii. Ground coverage by structures. Ground coverage by the structures are 45% of the total gross lot area. (f) Tabulation showing: is The derivation of numbers of off street parking and off street loading spaces shown in (d) above:., The maximum number of off street parking spaces allowed: 1,058 spaces The total amount of parking spaces provided: 1,040 spaces G:\DMS\72343\12084\0262688.01 0 10/12/1999 GO- 188 0 • ii. Total project density in dwelling units per acre. • Allowed: 5.7 acres x 500 units per acre = 2,850 units Proposed: 288 hotel rooms which are equivalent to 144 residential units (g) If common facilities (such as recreation areas of structures, private streets, common open space, etc:) are to be provided for the development, statements as to how such common facilities are to be provided and permanently maintained. The project contains several open public plazas and walkways. All facilities provided will be maintained by the Owner. (h) Storm drainage and sanitary sewerage plans. Storm drainage, water distribution, waste water and solid waste generation provisions are discussed in the Site Utility Study located under Tab 3 of the Supporting Documents. (i) Architectural definitions for buildings in the development; The design plans are included under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. The development will include 288 hotel units. Typical floor plans for the hotel floors are included on sheets A 1.3 under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. The retail areas are shown on sheet A 1.01-02 under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (j) Plans for signs will be detailed in a Development Parameters Guidelines Book to be made a part of this application by reference. (k) Landscaping plan, includingtypes, sizes and locations ofvegetation and decorative shrubbery, and showing provisions for irrigation and future maintenance. The Landscaping Plan located on Sheet L1.01-02 under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents, specify the plant types, sizes and locations, as well as indications that all planted areas will be fully irrigated and maintained by the Owner of the project. (1) Plans for recreation facilities, if any, including location and general description of buildings for such use. A recreational area will be provided for the hotel tower. (m) Such. additionaldata, maps, plans, or statements as may be required for the particular use or activity involved:_. The Drawings submitted with this Application are located under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (n) Such additional data as the applicant may believe is pertinent to the proper consideration of the site and development plan. Elevations depicting the architectural character of the project are included under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. . G:\DMS\72343\12084\0262688.01 10/12/1999 12. Section 1702.2.1 General Report. • (a) Property ownership or ownerships and beneficial interest within the boundaries of the area proposed for Major Use Special Permit. Statement of Ownership and beneficial interest within the boundaries of the area proposed for Major Use Special Permit are provided in Article LB & C. (b) The nature of the unified interest or control. The nature of unified interest or control is indicated in Article 1. (c) Survey of the proposed area showing property lines and ownership. A copy of the survey of the Property is included under Tab 5 of the Supporting Documents. (d) Map of existing features, including streets, alleys, easements, utilities lines, existing land use, general topography, and physical features. The existing site features and utility lines are shown on the survey of Property located under Tab 5 and the Site Utility Study located under Tab 3 of the Supporting Documents. In addition, the surrounding street systems are included under Tab 2, Traffic Impact Study and an aerial photograph of the surrounding area indicating the project site is found under Tab 6, Page 3. (e) Materials to demonstrate the relationship of the elements listed in (d) preceding to surrounding area characteristics. The Drawings Submitted with this Application are located under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. Materials may be presented to the Urban Design and Review Board for review. (� Existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan designations for the area on and around the lands proposed for Major Use Special Permit. The existing zoning designation for the Property pursuant to City of Miami Ordinance No. 11000, as Amended is SD -7. The Zoning Atlas Map on page 37 indicates the existing and surrounding mixed use zoning. The comprehensive plan future land use designation for the Property is "Restricted Commercial". The zoning and comprehensive plan designation are consistent with one another. 13. Section 1702.2.2 Major Use Special Permit Concept Plan. (a) Relationships of the concept plan to surrounding existing and proposed future uses. Activities, systems and facilities (transportation, recreation, view corridors, pedestrian systems; services, systems and similar uses). Article. II contains, a written narrative of the Project outlining proposed uses, activities and architectural character. This narrative also contains descriptions of the Project's relationship to traffic, pedestrian movements, and transportation access. Maps located on Tab 6 indicate the Project's relationship to surrounding streets, land uses and functions. Building elevations, sections and perspectives showing the proposed materials, vertical profile and height, and orientation to streets is included in the Drawings Submitted with this Application. The list of Drawings Submitted is found under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. 0 G:\DMS\72343\12084\0262688.01 10/12/1999 11 • (b) . Existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan principles and designations. The Project conforms to the SD -'7 zoning for this Property. The comprehensive plan future land use designation conforms with the land use designation currently in effect for this Property. Set back requirements under the Code are satisfied or superseded for the proposed project on SW 10'h Street. Variances are being requested from setback requirements along 9' Street. This design requirement has been undertaken in order to augment the open space for the City of Miami Brickell Promenade along SW 10 Street. 14. Section 1702.2.3 Developmental Impact Study. (a) A traffic analysis shall be submitted for an area within approximately 1/4 mile of the site, or an area including the major intersections to be impacted by the site, whichever is larger. The Traffic Impact Analysis is included under Tab 2 of the Supporting Documents. (b) Economic impact data shall be provided, including estimates for construction costs,. construction employment, and permanent employment. The Economic Impact Study is included under Tab 4 of the Supporting Documents. (c) A housing impact assessment. The Project is a mixed use project comprised of retail and hotel use. • (d) A description ofproposed energy conservation measures shall be provided, including only those measures that are proposed in addition to the minimum requirements in State Energy Code. Architecturally, the building envelope will be comprised of insulated walls and roof. Extensive use of wall shading by means of landscaping and canopies will be implemented. Electrically, all exterior and landscape lighting will be controlled by means of time clocks and photocell switches. Energy saving lamps, ballasts and fixtures are being considered in all common areas.. (e) Historic buildings. There are no. historic structures located on the Property. (i) Environmental zone. The Property is not located within an environmegtal preservation district.. G:\DMS\72343\12084\0262688.01 9 10/12/1999 0 1 • • 11 • • C� BRICKELL MAIN STREET MINORITY CONSTRUCTION EMPLOYMENT PLAN G:\DMS\72343\12084\0265424.01 10/28/1999 Go-- 188 • Minority Construction Employment Plan. A. Goal. The intent of applicant is to provide employment and economic opportunity for the unemployed and economic disadvantaged residents of Miami. This will be achieved during the various stages of the Project such as application of permit period; Construction Period; and final operation and management of the finished project. B. Background. The applicant of this Project, as with other projects, has always promoted and encouraged equal employment opportunities for minorities. The same efforts of utilizing a minority labor force in the City of Miami will be used on this Project. C. Plan. The applicant has an Equal Employment Opportunity Plan that will be adhered to by all firms involved in the planning, construction, and management and operation.of this Project. The following sources will be helpful in promoting equal employment opportunities for this Project. Florida Department of Commerce, Division of Economic Development The National Association of Minority Contractors The National Minority Supplier Development Council I. A. Goal. The intent of applicant is to provide employment and economic opportunity for the unemployed and economic disadvantaged residents of Miami. This will be achieved during the various stages of the Project such as application of permit period; Construction Period; and final operation and management of the finished project. B. Back rg o� The applicant of this Project, as with other projects, has always promoted and encouraged equal employment opportunities for 0 G:\DMS\72343\12084\0265424.01 10/28/1999 GO- lob • • • minorities. The same efforts of utilizing a minority labor force in the City of Miami will be used on this Project. C. Plan. The applicant has an Equal Employment Opportunity Plan that will be adhered to by all firms involved in the planning, construction, and management and operation of this Project. The following sources will be helpful in promoting equal employment opportunities for this Project. Florida Department of Commerce, Division of Economic Development Florida Department of Transportation The National Association of Minority Contractors The National Minority Supplier Development Council III. Minority Contractor/Subcontractor Equal Employment Plan. A. Goal. To promote economic opportunities for minority contractors and vendors in the City of Miami. B. Background. The applicant's intent is to pursue his successful past practices of hiring qualified minority construction contractors and subcontractors in every phase of the construction and management of the project. IV. The Applicant's Policy Statement for Equal Employment Opportunity. Purpose To ensure that the company's personnel policies and practices are administered equally and without regard for race, color, religion, sex, age, national origin, handicap, or veteran status. G:\DMS\72343\12084\0265424.01 10/28/1999 2 U Policy 1. All employees and job applicants are guaranteed equality of employment opportunity. This means that we will not discriminate against any worker or applicant on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, age, national origin, handicap, or veteran status. 2. All recruitment, selection, placement, training, and layoff decisions made by the Company's supervisors or managers will be based solely on candidates j ob- related qualifications and abilities. 3. All employees who apply for a promotion or transfer will be given equal consideration for a promotion or transfer will be given equal consideration. Assuming that an opening exists, the qualifications of a candidate for a promotion or transfer will be assessed solely on the basis of the individual's ability and merit (as demonstrated by the applicant's performance record). 4. All other personnel policies and practices of the Company, including compensation, benefits, discipline, and safety and health programs, as well as social and recreational activities, will be administered and conducted without regard to any individual's race, color, religion, sex, age, national origin, handicap, or veteran status. 5. The Company will establish special programs to recruit, hire and ensure the advancement of qualified minority group members, women, handicapped individuals and veterans. - 6. The Company will take all necessary steps to ensure that each employee's work environment is free of unlawful discrimination or harassment based on race, color, religion, sex, age, national origin, handicap or veteran status. 0 G:\DMS\72343\12084\0265424.01 10/28/1999 3 • BRICKELL MAINSTREET TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY Prepared for: Beame Architectural Partnership 116 Alhambra Circle, Suite J Coral Gables, FL 33134 Prepared by: Carr Smith Corradino 5200 NW 33'd Avenue, Suite 203 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309 October 1999 • Go- 188 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVESUMMARY .................. .................... ...............................................;.........:........ 1 Existing (1999) PM Peak Hour Traffic Performance............................................................. 1 Future (2001) Traffic Performance.................................................................................:.. 1 Circulation Around the Project Site.................................................................................... 2 Recommendations for Improvements................................................................................ 2 INTRODUCTION......:.....................................................................................................:.. 4 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY................................................................................. 4 TrafficPerformance......................................................................................................... 4 Level of Service Standard................................................................................................. 4 GeometricConfiguration... ............................................................................................... 6 AnalysisPeriods............................................................................................................... 6 TurningMovement Counts............................................................................................... 6 TrafficGrowth Rate ......... :................................................................................................ 6 TrafficSignal Data........................................................................................................... 6 StudyLocations....................................................................•••........................................ 9 EXISTING (1999) TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE....................................................................... 10 FUTURE (2001) TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE WITHOUT PROJECT .......................................... 12 FUTURE (2001) TRAFFIC CONDITIONS WITH PROJECT ..............................................:..... 16 TripGeneration.....................................................................:........................................16 TripDistribution............................................................................................................. 18 TripAssignment............................................................................................................. 18 FUTURE (2001) TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE WITH PROJECT ................................................. 20 : CIRCULATION AROUND THE PROJECT SITE........................:.............I............................. 22 VehicularCirculation.....................................................................................:................ 22 PedestrianCirculation....:............................................•••................................................ 22 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR IMPROVEMENTS................................................................... 24 11 APPENDIX A — Traffic Counts APPENDIX B — Calculation of Traffic Growth Rate APPENDIX C — Existing (1999) Level of Service Calculations APPENDIX D — Future (2001) Level of Service Calculation without the Project APPENDIX E - Calculation of Project's Internal Capture Rate APPENDIX F — Future (2001) Level of Service Calculations with the Project Brickell Mainstreet Traffic Impact Study G:\2573\word\BRICKELL-Mainstreet. DOC 10/27/1999 0 - .& a • 0 LIST OF FIGURES .Figure 1 - Project Location.............................................................................................................5 Figure 2 - Roadway Network in Study Area.....................................................................................7 Figure 3 - Existing (1999) PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.................................................................7 Figure 4 - Future (200 1) PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes W/O Project.............................................13 Figure.5 - Future (2001) PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes with Project...............................................19 LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Existing (1999) PM Peak Hour Intersection Performance...................................................10 Table 2: Existing (1999) PM Peak Hour Link Performance..............................................................1 1 Table 3: Future (2001) PM Peak Hour Intersection Performance W/O Project..................................12 Table 4: Future (2001) PM Peak Hour Link Performance W/O Project.............................................15 Table 5: Brickell Mainstreet External Trip Generation....................................................:................17 Table 6: Brickell Mainstreet Net New Trip Generation....................................................................18 Table 7: Cardinal Trip Distribution...............................................................................................18 Table 8: Future (2001) PM Peak Hour Intersection Performance with Project...................................20 Table 9: Future (2001) PM Peak Hour Link Performance with Project.............................................:21 Table 10: Pedestrian Traffic in Study Area.....................................................................................22 Brickell Mainstreet Traffic Impact Study October 1999 610- 188 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report summarizes the results of the traffic impact study for Brickell Mainstreet. The purpose of this study is to identify the traffic impacts associated with the Project, which would be located along S Miami Avenue between S 9th and S 10" Streets. The Project will consist of 288 apart -hotel units along with approximately 143,500 square feet of retail and 32,000 square feet of restaurant floor area. The project will also provide on-site parking for 1,040 vehicles. Presented first in the report is an analysis of the existing traffic conditions in the study area. This is followed by an analysis of future traffic conditions in 2001, when the Project will be fully completed and occupied. Also analyzed is the circulation around the Project site. Existing (1999) PM Peak Hour Traffic Performance Traffic performance was calculated at a number of intersections and along several roadway segments in the vicinity of the Project. Results of the existing conditions analysis indicate that the majority of study intersections operate at or above LOS D. The exceptions include: The intersection of SE 7'h Street and Brickell Avenue is operating at LOS E+ • The intersection of SE 8'h Street and Brickell Avenue is operating at LOS F If adjustments were made to optimize the signal phasing at these intersections, their performance could be expected to improve to LOS D+. Results of the arterial link performance analyses indicate that all study links presently operate at or above LOS D with the exception of the following two links, which presently operate at LOS E: • SW 13" Street between SW 2'd Avenue and SW 15' Avenue (westbound) • Brickell Avenue between SE 8'h Street and SE 13'h Street (southbound) Future (2001) Traffic Performance The results of the analysis of future traffic conditions without the Project indicate that the performance of several study intersections is expected to change with the growth in background traffic. In particular, improvements are required at the intersections of SE 8th Ste'eet at Brickell Avenue and SE 13th Street at Brickell Avenue to maintain LOS E and LOS D, respectively. The westbound link along SW 13" Street between SW 2„d Avenue and SW I" Avenue is expected to operate at LOS E. The westbound link along SE 13th Street between S Miami Avenue and Brickell Avenue is also expected to operate at LOS E. Additionally, the eastbound link along SE 13th Street between.S Miami Avenue and Brickell Avenue is expected to operate at LOS F. Finally, both the northbound and southbound links along Brickell Avenue between SE 71h Street and SE 81h Street are expected to operate at LOS F The results of the analysis of future traffic conditions with the Project indicate that conditions will not worsen significantly because of the addition of Project traffic. Improvements are recommended for the intersections of SE 8'h Street at Brickell Avenue and SE 13th Street at Brickell Avenue. However, it GADMS\72343\12084\0266486.01 11/5/1999 • should be stressed that these improvements would still be warranted without the addition of Project traffic. The improvements are required to absorb the cumulative impact of the continued growth of traffic in the region and, specifically, the traffic associated with several committed developments within the study area. The performance of the unsignalized intersection of S 10'x' Street and S Miami Avenue is expected to change from LOS B to LOS F with the addition of Project traffic. However, the performance of this intersection could be improved substantially with the installation of a traffic signal. Circulation Around the Projed Site In order to provide a better local circulation, a segment of SW 9' Street between S Miami Avenue and SW 15' Street is recommended to be converted to a two-way operation. This will provide consistency of traffic flows on S 9'' Street and minimize circuity in the area. Pedestrian circulation analyses indicate no significant conflicts within the existing volumes. The Project is expected to add a substantial amount of pedestrian traffic to the neighborhood. However, the Project proposes to build a pair of pedestrian bridges over S Miami Avenue in order to minimize pedestrian conflicts. Recommendations for Improvements In order to maintain LOS E+ at the intersection of SE 8`' Street and Brickell Avenue the following improvements are recommended: • Restripe the westbound approach to consist of 1 left -turn lane and 2 right -turn lanes • Restripe the eastbound approach to consist of l left -turn lane, 1 shared left-turn/through lane, 1 shared through/right-turn lane and 1 right -turn lane • Modify the traffic signal to provide a right -turn arrow for the westbound right -turn lanes to allow this movement to move concurrently with the southbound left -turn movement In order to maintain LOS D at the intersection of SE 13'' Street and Brickell Avenue the following improvements are recommended: • Restripe the westbound approach to consist of 1 left -turn lane, 1 through lane and 1 shared through/right-turn lane • Provide a protected phase for the northbound left -turn movement • Modify the traffic signal to provide a right -turn arrow for the eastbound right -turn lane to allow this movement to move concurrently with the northbound left -turn movement • Modify the traffic signal to provide a right -turn arrow for the southbound right -turn lane to allow this movement to move concurrently with the eastbound movement The future performance of the intersection of S 10'' Street and S Miami Avenue could be improved substantially with the installation of a traffic signal. Therefore, a detailed signal warrant analysis is recommended to determine if the installation of a traffic signal is justified. If the intersection satisfies the signal warrant analysis, a traffic signal should be installed at this location. Brickell Mainstreet Traffic Impact Study October 1999 .c.a J 3 2 Is • :7 Finally, the segment of SW 9" Street between SW 1 s' Avenue and S Miami Avenue should be converted to a two-way operation. This conversion will make the traffic flow direction consistent throughout S 9'h Street. As a result, the traffic flow will improve substantially in the area immediately surrounding the Project by reducing the circuity required to access the Project and other sites. Brickell Moinstreet Traffic Impact Study 3 October 1999 • 0 INTRODUCTION This report summarizes the results of the traffic impact study for Brickell Mainstreet. The Project will be located along S Miami Avenue between S 9" and S 10'h Streets, as illustrated in Figure 1. The Project will consist of 288 apart -hotel units along with approximately 143,500 square feet of retail and 32,000 square feet of restaurant floor area. The project will also provide on-site parking for 1,040 vehicles. The purpose of this study is to identify the traffic impacts associated with the Project. Presented first in the report is an analysis of the existing traffic conditions in the study area. This is followed by an analysis of future traffic conditions in 2001, when the Project will be fully completed and occupied. Also analyzed in the report is the circulation around the Project site. TRAFFIC ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY Traffic Performance Level of service (LOS) is the traffic performance measure generally accepted in traffic analysis. Levels of service range from LOS A (free flow with negligible delays) to LOS F (heavily congested with long delays). LOS B, LOS C, LOS D and LOS E indicate intermediate conditions. Intersection levels of service were calculated using the 5/GN4L97software and the Highway Capacity 10 Software (HCS). Arterial link level of service calculations were performed utilizing the maximum service volumes provided in the Florida Department of Transportation's (FDOT) 1998Leve/of5erviceHandbook and ART -PLAN, which is an arterial performance calculation software developed by the FDOT. The SIGNAL97, HCS and ART -PLAN software replicate the procedures recommended in the Highway Capacity Manual. - • Required input for SIGNAL97, HCS and ART -PLAN analyses include: • roadway geometry • turning movement volumes • traffic signal timing (cycle lengths and phasing) • spacing between signalized intersections The acquisition of the required data is described in detail next. Level of Service Standard The results of level of service calculations are compared against the established standards to determine the adequacy of traffic performance. Specifically, the peak hour level of service standard for the study area, as specified in the Downtown Miami DRI, is LOS E. However, 20% of roadway links or intersections are allowed to fall below LOS E "within the limitations of physical, historic or aesthetic constraints." G: \DMS\72343\ 12084\0266486.01 11/5/1999 • 04 J Bisc Blvd Way iart&ive L _ — Brickell Park Brickell Key _ F-1: Southside ; Park , �e 'Qa Pa peon v4q Brickell Mainstreet Traffic Impact Study Project Location Map Biscayne Bay Figure 1 • • Geometric Configuration The existing geometry of the streets in the study area, in particular at the study intersections, was obtained through field review. The existing lane configuration is summarized in Figure 2. Analysis Periods Traffic performance was calculated for the PM peak hour, as required for projects occurring within the area covered by the Downtown Miami Areawide Development of Regional Impact (Downtown Miami DRI). Turning Movement Counts Turning movement counts were obtained at the majority of the study intersections in June/July 1997. Additional turning movement counts were obtained in September 1999. FDOT's peak season conversion factors were utilized to adjust the counts to represent peak season traffic conditions. All turning movement counts collected for this Project are included in Appendix A_ Traffic Growth Rate Because many of the turning movement counts were obtained for this Project in 1997, it was necessary to determine the annual traffic growth rate in the study area to adjust the counts to reflect 1999 traffic • conditions. The annual traffic growth rate was determined based upon historic traffic growth trends in the study area. Annual average daily traffic (AADT) volumes were obtained from the FDOT for several count stations in the study area including the following: • SE 13'h Street (Coral Way) west of U.S. 1 (Brickell Avenue) • U.S. 1 (Brickell Avenue) south of SE 13'h Street (Coral Way) • U.S. 1 (Brickell Avenue) south of SE 81h Street (Tamiami Trail) • SW 8'h Street (Tamiami Trail eastbound) west of U.S. 1 (Brickell Avenue) • SW 7'h Street (Tamiami Trail westbound) west of U.S. 1 (Brickell Avenue) Analyses of historic volumes at these locations determined that a yearly growth factor of 1.7% is appropriate for the study area. The calculation of the growth rate is presented in Appendix B. The 1.7% annual growth factor was applied to the adjusted 1997 traffic volumes to determine peak season 1999 traffic volumes. in the study area. These volumes are presented in Figure 3. Traffic Signal Data Traffic signal phasing information was downloaded from the computerized Miami -Dade County Traffic Signal Control System. Brickell Moinstreet Traffic Impact Study 6 October 1999 SW 7th Street SW 8th Street SW 13th Street - -j GO 1 � 3 LOW 11 _ l t 11 3 LOW lol- --Vol l LOW 2 LU ttr' F r 1�BRICKELLAAl LU SW 10th Street C4 1 4 LU Brickell Mainstreet Traffic Impact Study Figure Roadway Network in Study Area 2 SW Ah Street Q N 44 m Q CNCn m Q E j C Q � 106 ~1228 `cN � N^^ 115 � � �-105 � j-9946 38 1 X795 SW 8th StreetCN97 kill. � � MVS �► 309 � 109 � 683—x► (� � 702'_► a �� 20 —► 114 QN 127 114 213 � l � 37x-159 � 1 SW 10th Street 11 1 3 i2 a�� N � cJ fi k-143 �86 MN ~162 j�► 1466 399 4;j `► � 122 ,� +`► J-5 r39 -*)t(*- 457-11- 12 � � A-41 SW lath S 190 343---► 4 coN .� M^ 44� �,1�1� f�OM 106 ^MSO -�trw N Street � 106 ~1228 `cN � N^^ 115 � � �-105 � j-9946 38 1 X795 kill. � � MVS �► 309 � 109 � 683—x► (� � 702'_► a �� 20 —► 114 QN 127 114 213 � l � 37x-159 � 1 SW 10th Street 11 1 3 i2 a�� N � cJ fi k-143 �86 MN ~162 j�► 1466 399 4;j `► � 122 ,� +`► J-5 r39 -*)t(*- 457-11- 12 � � A-41 -41W � �► 190 343---► 4 coN .� M^ 44� �,1�1� f�OM 106 ^MSO Brickell Mainstreet Traffic Impact Study Figure Existing (1999) PM Peak Hour Volumes 3 0 Study Locations Traffic performance was calculated at the following intersections in the study area: SW 7" Street at SW 2"d Avenue • SW 7't' Street at SW 151 Avenue • S Ph Street at S Miami Avenue • SE 7' Street at Brickell Avenue • SW 8' Street at SW 2"d Avenue • SW 8' Street at SW 15' Avenue • S 8'" Street at S Miami Avenue • SE 8'' Street at Brickell Avenue • SW 9' Street at SW 15' Avenue • S 9'' Street at S Miami Avenue • SE 9'' Street. at SE 15' Avenue • SW 10" Street at SW 15' Avenue • S 10'" Street of S Miami Avenue • SE 10' Street at SE 151 Avenue • SW 13'x' Street at SW 2nd Avenue • SW 13'' Street at SW 15' Avenue • S 13'x' Street at S Miami Avenue • SE 13th Street at Brickell Avenue . The roadway links evaluated in the study include the following: • SW 7" Street between SW 2"d Avenue and SW 15' Avenue • SW 7'' Street between SW 15' Avenue and S Miami Avenue • SE 7'' Street between S Miami Avenue and Brickell Avenue • SW 8' Street between SW 2nd Avenue and SW 15' Avenue • SW 8'' Street between SW 1' Avenue and S Miami Avenue • SE 8' Street between S Miami Avenue and Brickell Avenue • SW 9'fi Street between SW 15' Avenue and S Miami Avenue • SE 9'' Street between S Miami Avenue and SE 151 Avenue • SW 10'~' Street between SW 15' Avenue and S Miami Avenue • SE 10'' Street between S Miami Avenue and SE 15' Avenue • SW 13'x' Street between SW 2"d Avenue and SW 15' Avenue • SW 13'x' Street between SW 15' Avenue and S Miami Avenue • SE 13' Street between S Miami Avenue and Brickell Avenue • SW 2"d Avenue between SW 7'' Street and SW 8' Street • SW 2nd Avenue between SW 8" Street and SW 13' Street • SW I"Avenue between SW 7't' Street and SW 8' Street • SW Pt Avenue between SW 8' Street and SW 13'x' Street • S Miami Avenue between S 7' Street and S 8'h Street • S Miami Avenue between S 8' Street and S 13'x' Street • SE 151 Avenue between SE 8' Street and SE 10' Street • Brickell Avenue between SE 7'h Street and SE 8' Street • Brickell Avenue between SE 8'' Street and SE 13' Street r,--1 6L--A Brickell Mainstreet Traffic Impact Study October 1999 C()-. 1008 0 0 EXISTING (1999) TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE Traffic performance calculations were completed for the PM peak hour using the geometry illustrated in Figure 2 and the traffic volumes shown in Figure 3. Detailed intersection performance calculations are included in Appendix C, of which a summary is provided in Table 1. Table 1: Existing (1999) PM Peak Hour Intersection Performance Intersection Level of Service Volurne/Capacity SW 7'' Street at SW 2nd Avenue B 0.66 SW 7'h Street at SW 15' Avenue C+ 0.63 S 7'h Street at S Miami Avenue B 0.52 SE 7'h Street at Brickell Avenue E+/D+ , 0.75/0.74 , SW 8'' Street at SW 2nd Avenue B 0.44 SW 8'h Street at SW 15' Avenue B 0.36 S 8" Street at S Miami Avenue B 0.50 SE 8'h Street at Brickell Avenue F/D+ , 0.81/0.65 , SW 9' Street at SW 15' Avenue 6 2 NA S 9'' Street at S Miami Avenue B 2 NA (31 SE 9'h Street at SE 15' Avenue A 2 NA (31 SW 10'' Street at SW 1st Avenue B 2 NA s S 10'h Street at S Miami Avenue B 2 NA s SE 10' Street at SE 151 Avenue B NA (31 SW 13' Street at SW 2nd Avenue C+ 0.76 SW 13' Street at SW 151 Avenue B+ 0.51 S 13" Street at S Miami Avenue B+ 0.57 SE 1.3' Street at Brickell Avenue C/C , 0.60/0.60 , (1) Existing Signal Phasing/Optimized Signal Phasing (2) Represents the Level of Service of the worst approach of a two-way stop controlled intersection (3) Volume/Capacity is not calculated for unsignalized intersections As shown in the above Table 1, the majority of the study intersections are operating at or above LOS D. However, the intersection of SE 7' Street and Brickell Avenue is operating at LOS E+ and the intersection of SE 81h Street and Brickell Avenue is operating at LOS F. If adjustments were made to optimize the signal phasing at these intersections, their performance could be expected to improve to LOS D+. Additionally, adjustments to the signal phasing could result in reduced delay for the westbound approach to the intersection of SE 13' Street and Brickell Avenue. Arterial link performance was based upon the maximum service volumes provided in the Florida Department of Transportation's (FDOT) 1998 Leve%of Service Handbook. Results of the analysis are presented in Table 2. Brickell Mainstreet Traffic Impact Study 10 October 1999 V • • • • Table 2: Existing (1999) PM Peak Hour Link Performance Roadway Link Level of Service SW 7'h Street between SW 2"d Avenue and SW 15' Avenue B D SW 7" Street between SW V Avenue and S Miami Avenue 6 D SE 7' Street between S Miami Avenue and Brickell Avenue (WB) D SW 8" Street between SW 2"d Avenue and SW 1 51 Avenue EB D SW 8'� Street between SW 15' Avenue and S Miami Avenue EB D SE 8'h Street between S Miami Avenue and Brickell Avenue EB C SW 9'h Street between SW 1st Avenue and S Miami Avenue B C SE 9'h Street between S Miami Avenue and SE 15' Avenue B D SE 9'h Street between S Miami Avenue and SE 151 Avenue EB C SW 10" Street between SW 151 Avenue and S_Miami Avenue B C SW 10'f' Street between SW 151 Avenue and S Miami Avenue EB C SE 10'' Street between S Miami Avenue and SE 151 Avenue WB C SE 10" Street between S Miami Avenue and SE 151 Avenue EB C SW 13" Street between SW 2"d Avenue and SW 15' Avenue WB E SW 13'' Street between SW 2"d Avenue and SW 15' Avenue EB D SW 13" Street between SW V Avenue and S Miami Avenue WB D SW 13'h Street between SW 151 Avenue and S Miami Avenue EB D SE 13'' Street between S Miami Avenue and Brickell Avenue B) D SE 13' Street between S Miami Avenue and Brickell Avenue EB D SW 2"d Avenue between SW 7'h Street and SW 8'h Street NB C SW 2nd Avenue between SW 7th Street and SW 8" Street SB C SW 2"d Avenue between SW 8" Street and SW 13" Street (NB) D SW 2nd Avenue between SW 8'h Street and SW 13h Street SB D SW 15' Avenue between SW 7'h Street and SW 81h Street SB C SW 1' Avenue between SW 81h Street and SW 13'h Street SB C S Miami Avenue between SW 7'' Street and SW 81h Street (NB) C S Miami Avenue between SW 8th Street and SW 13'x' Street SB C SE l st Avenue between SE 8'h Street and SE 101h Street NB C SE 151 Avenue between SE 81h Street and SE 10" Street SB C Brickell Avenue between SE 7" Street and SE 8th Street (NB) D Brickell Avenue between SE 7'h Street and SE 8'h Street SB D Brickell Avenue between SE 81h Street and SE 13'' Street NB D Brickell Avenue between SE 81h Street and SE 13th Street SB E Results of the arterial link performance analyses indicate that all study links, presently operate at or above LOS D with the exception of the following two links, which presently operate at LOSE: • SW 131h Street between SW.2"d-Avenue and SW I" Avenue • Brickell Avenue between SE 8th Street and SE 13'h Street Brickell Moinstreet Traffic Impact Study October 1999 .��, JL SCS" 0 .9 • FUTURE (2001) TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE WITHOUT PROJECT • The calculation of future traffic performance without the Project has two purposes: It is a necessary step to obtain the prevailing traffic conditions near the Project site by the time Brickell Mainstreet is completed and occupied in 2001. • It helps isolate the impacts of the Project traffic. The growth in background traffic to 2001 was first calculated utilizing the 1.7% annual growth. rate, which was determined for the study area based upon historic growth trends. It was determined that additional traffic wily be generated in the study area by several committed developments. The City of Miami Planning Department specified that the traffic expected to be generated by the following developments should be considered committed: • Brickell Bay Plaza • Yacht Club at Brickell — Phase II • J.W. Marriott Hotel & Barclay's Financial Center The traffic studies prepared for these developments were obtained. from the City of Miami. Traffic volumes expected to be generated by the developments were extracted from the studies and added to the expected 2001 volumes. The resulting 2001 traffic volumes without the Project are illustrated in Figure 4. It may be noted that traffic volumes in the study area are expected to increase considerably over the next few years. Detailed intersection performance calculations for the expected future (2001) traffic conditions without the Project are included in Appendix D, of which a summary is provided in Table 3. Table 3: Future (2001) PM Peak Hour Intersection Performance W/O Project Intersection Level of Service Volume/Capacity SW 7'h Street at SW 2"d Avenue C+ 0.74 SW 7'h Street at SW I" Avenue C+ 0.73 S 7'h Street at S Miami Avenue B 0.61 SE 7'h Street at Brickell Avenue D 0.81 SW 8'h Street at SW 2nd Avenue B 0.51 SW 8'h Street at SW 15' Avenue B 0.44 S8 1h Street at S Miami Avenue B 0.59 SE 8'h Street at Brickell Avenue D 0.80 SW 9'h Street at SW 1"Avenue B s NA S 9'h Street at S Miami Avenue B 2 NA SE 9'h Street at SE I"Avenue A(21 NA SW 10'' Street at SW I"Avenue C z NA(3) S 10'h Street at S Miami Avenue B z NA SE 10'h Street at SE 1"Avenue B NA SW 13'h Street at SW 2"d Avenue D+ 0.88 SW 13'h Street at SW 1"Ave nue B+ -4 0.61 Brickell Moinstreet Traffic Impact Study October 1999 12 SW 7th Stre SW 8th Stre SW 13th St, I—,n L1, Brickell Mainstreet Traffic Impact Study Figure Future (200 7) PM Peak Hour Volumes w/o Project 4 ^� Q Q Q Q ~12129 62 ♦-1015119 972 E cr '► 1 I—,n L1, Brickell Mainstreet Traffic Impact Study Figure Future (200 7) PM Peak Hour Volumes w/o Project 4 ^� /j-109-328 ~12129 62 ♦-1015119 972 �% 1 Di- �^ O� ^ �► k*- J720 3t985 —► 112 ^� 314 56� 118 o, Q CO 1 32 911-0- 108 �'� j 296 —� 318 ^^ � �— 268 400 101 SW 10th Street 14 � 3 few o^^ 13 ^,^. �c Q ^�� 160N�11��88 3 0 68 4) 1� 6 A)k*.41 x � �1� 15 0 136 eet 439 ��� 523 492—► �t� 120 5� °,_�N AL M= 45� NVN I—,n L1, Brickell Mainstreet Traffic Impact Study Figure Future (200 7) PM Peak Hour Volumes w/o Project 4 • Table 3: Future (2001) PM Peak Hour Intersection Performance W/0 Project (cont.) S 13" Street at S Miami Avenue B 0.70 SE 13" Street at Brickell Avenue D+ 0.75 , (1) The performance analysis assumed improvements would be implemented (2) Represents the Level of Service of the worst approach of a two-way stop controlled intersection (3) Volume/Capacity is not calculated for unsignalized intersections As shown in Table 3, the majority of the study intersections are expected to continue to operate at or above LOS D. However, minor improvements will be required to maintain LOS D at two intersections, SE 8'' Street at Brickell Avenue and SE 13' Street at Brickell Avenue. In order to maintain LOS D at the intersection of SE 8't' Street and Brickell Avenue the following improvements are recommended: • Restripe the westbound approach to consist of 1 left -turn lane and 2 right -turn lanes • Restripe the eastbound approach to consist of lleft-turn lane, i shared left-turn/through lane, 1 shared through/right-turn lane and 1 right -turn lane • Modify the traffic signal to provide a right -turn arrow for the westbound right -turn lanes to allow this movement to move concurrently with the southbound left -turn movement Analysis indicates that, if the improvements listed above are implemented, the future performance of the intersection of SE 8'h Street and Brickell Avenue will be LOS D. 40 In order to maintain LOS D at the intersection of SE 13'' Street and Brickell Avenue the following improvements are recommended: • • Restripe the westbound approach to consist of 1 left -turn lane, 1 through lane and 1 shared through/right-turn lane • Provide a protected phase for the northbound left -turn movement • Modify the traffic signal to provide a right -turn arrow for the eastbound right -turn lane to allow this movement to move concurrently with the northbound left -turn movement • Modify the traffic signal to provide a right -turn arrow for the southbound right -turn lane to allow this movement to move concurrently with the eastbound movement Analysis indicates that, if the improvements listed above are implemented, the future performance of the intersection of SE 13'' Street and Brickell Avenue will be LOS D+. Arterial link performance was initially based upon the maximum service volumes provided in the FDOT's 1998 Leve/of Service Handbook. If it was determined that a link was operating below LOS D based upon this methodology, a more refined analysis was performed utilizing the ART -PLAN software. Results of the analysis are presented in the following table. Brickell Mainstreet Traffic Impact Study 14 October 1999 GO- 0 • �J • • Table 4: Future (2001) PM Peak Hour Link Performance W/0 Project Roadway Link Level of Service SW 7th Street between SW 2nd Avenue and SW 15' Avenue B D , SW 7'h Street. between SW 15' Avenue and S Miami Avenue B D , SE 7th Street between S Miami Avenue and Brickell Avenue B) D , SW 81h Street between SW 2"d Avenue and SW 15' Avenue EB D , SW 81h Street between SW 15' Avenue and S Miami Avenue EB D , SE 81h Street between S Miami Avenue and Brickell Avenue EB D , SW 9'h Street between SW 1 st Avenue and S Miami Avenue (WB) C , SE 91h Street between S Miami Avenue and SE 15` Avenue WB D , SE 91h Street between S Miami Avenue and SE 15' Avenue EB C , SW 10'h Street between SW 15' Avenue and S Miami Avenue B C , SW 10'h Street between SW 15' Avenue and S Miami Avenue EB C , SE 10'' Street between S Miami Avenue and SE 151 Avenue B C , SE 10' Street between S Miami Avenue and SE 15' Avenue EB C , SW 13th Street between SW 2nd Avenue and SW V Avenue B E s SW 13'' Street between SW 2nd Avenue and SW 15' Avenue EB C z SW 131h Street between SW l st Avenue and S Miami Avenue B D z SW 13" Street between SW 15' Avenue and S Miami Avenue EB C z SE 131h Street between S Miami Avenue and Brickell Avenue B) E 2 SE 13th Street between S Miami Avenue and Brickell Avenue EB F z SW 2nd Avenue between SW 7" Street and SW 8" Street NB C , SW 2nd Avenue between SW 7th Street.and SW 81h Street SB C , SW 2nd Avenue between SW 81h Street and SW 13" Street (NB) D , SW 2nd Avenue between SW 8" Street and SW 13th Street SB D , SW 151 Avenue between SW 7th Street and SW 81h Street SB C , SW I"Avenue between SW 81h Street and SW 13't' Street (SB). C , S Miami Avenue between SW 71h Street and SW 8'h Street (NB) C , S Miami Avenue between SW 81h Street and SW 13th Street (SB) C , SE 151 Avenue between SE 8th Street. and SE 10" Street NB C , SE 15' Avenue between SE 81h Street and SE 10'h Street SB C , Brickell Avenue between SE 71h Street and SE 81h Street (NB) F 2 Brickell Avenue between SE 7" Street and SE.81h Street SB F z Brickell Avenue between SE 8'h Street and SE 13'h Street NB D(21 Brickell Avenue between SE 81h Street and SE 131h Street SB D s (1) Based upon maximum service volume thresholds provided in FDOT's 1998 Level of Service Handbook (2) Based upon results of ART -PLAN analysis As shown in Table 4, the vast majority of the study links are expected to operate at or above LOS D. However, the westbound link along SW 13" Street between SW 2nd Avenue and SW 151 Avenue is expected to operate at LOS E. Additionally, the westbound link along SE 13' Street between S Miami Avenue and Brickell Avenue is also expected to operate at LOS E. BrickeltMainstreet Traffic Impact Study October 1999 15 0 1 0 The eastbound link along SE 13" Street between S Miami Avenue and Brickell Avenue is expected to operate at LOS F. Although the widening of this link is not feasible, improvements to the intersection of SE 13" Street and Brickell Avenue were identified previously. The improvements include modifying the traffic signal to provide a right -turn arrow for the eastbound right -turn lane to allow, this movement to move concurrently with the northbound left -turn movement. Finally, results of the ART -PLAN analysis indicates that the longer segment of SE 13'h Street between SW 2nd Avenue and Brickell Avenue is expected to operate at LOS E in the eastbound direction. Both the northbound and southbound links along Brickell Avenue between SE 7'h Street and SE 8'h Street are expected to operate at LOS F. Again, the widening of this link is not feasible, but improvements have been identified for the intersection of Brickell Avenue and SE 8'h Street. Although the improvements were identified for the -eastbound and westbound approaches to the intersection, their implementation will allow more of the signal's green time to be allocated to the northbound and southbound approaches. Finally, results of the ART -PLAN analysis indicates that the longer segment of Brickell Avenue between SE 7'h Street and SE 13'h Street is expected to operate at LOS D in the northbound direction and LOS E in the southbound direction. FUTURE (2001) TRAFFIC CONDITIONS WITH PROJECT Brickell Mainstreet will consist of approximately 288 apart -hotel units, which will be owned for use on a time-share basis. The units are not intended for use as a primary residence and will function similar to a hotel. The Project will also consist of 143,500 square feet of retail and 32,000 square feet of restaurant floor area and provide on-site parking for 1,040 vehicles. Traffic conditions were assessed for 2001, when the Project would be fully completed and occupied. In order to estimate future traffic conditions with the Project a three-step process is followed: Trip Generation - The number of trips generated at the Project site is calculated Trip Distribution - The origins and destinations of the trips are estimated Trip Assignment - The Project trips are then added to the traffic on the surrounding transportation network (expected future traffic) These three steps are explained in more detail next. Trip Generation As mentioned previously, Brickell Mainstreet will consist of approximately 288 units, which will be owned for use on a time-share basis. The units are not intended for use as a primary residence and will function similar to a hotel. The Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE's) Trip Generation manual (6'h Edition, 1997) provides average trip generation rates or equations for a variety of land uses. It was determined that the Project is most similar to ITE land use category #311, an "All Suites Hotel." The Project will also consist of 143,500 square feet of retail floor area. The trip equation provided for ITE land use category #820, "Shopping Center," was utilized to calculate the number of trips expected to be generated by the retail component of the Project. However, trip generation was performed for Brickell Mainstreet Traffic Impact Study October 1999 60 x.88 D 0 only 132,330 square feet of retail floor area because there is presently approximately 1 1,1 70 square feet of retail floor area on the Project site. Additionally, the Project will provide 32,000 square feet of restaurant floor area. The trip rate provided for ITE land use category #832, "High -Turnover (Sit -Down) Restaurant," was utilized to calculate the number of trips expected to be generated by this component of the Project. However, trip generation was performed for only 23•,463 square feet of restaurant floor area because there is presently 8,537 square feet of restaurant floor area on the Project site. A number of trips associated with the Project can be expected to be internal to the site because of the Project's mixed-use nature. ITE's Trip Generation Handbook provides a methodology for estimating trip generation at multi -use developments. This methodology was utilized to calculate the internal capture rates for the Project's different land uses. It was determined that approximately 22% of the Project's trips would be internal to the site. The.worksheet utilized to determine the Project's internal capture rate is included as Appendix E. Additionally, a number of trips associated with the Project can be expected to utilize alternative modes of transportation. The Project site is served by high quality transit service within walking distance including the Metrorail, Metromover and MDTA bus routes. Therefore, a 10%reduction in trip generation was made to account for alternative modes. This reduction is consistent with the projected daily mode split for the Brickell area provided in the Downtown Miami DRI. Finally, a number of trips that will access Brickell Mainstreet may already be utilizing roadways in the study area. These trips, which are known as pass -by trips, are made as intermediate stops on the way from an origin to a primary trip destination. A high percentage of trips attracted to certain land uses, such as restaurants, are pass -by trips. Information on pass -by trips was also obtained from ITE's Trip Generation Handbook, which provides pass -by capture rates for various land uses. According to the Trip Generation Handbook, approximately 36% of the external trips associated with Project's retail component and 43% of the external trips associated with the Project's restaurant component can be expected to be pass -by trips. Table 5 breaks down the Project's expected external trip generation by land use. Table 5: Brickell Mainstreet External Trip Generation Land Use PM Peak Hour Trips PM Peak Hour External Trips Total Internal • Transit W Entering Exiting Hotel 158 78 8 30 42 Retail 755 103 64 282 306 Restaurant 255 77 18 96 64 Total 1,159 258 90 404 407 (1) 10% of the Project's.external trips were assumed to utilize alternative modes including transit As shown in Table 5, the Project can be expected to generate approximately 1,159 total trips during the PM peak hour. Approximately 258 of the trips can be expected to be internal to the site and 90 of the trips can be expected to utilize alternative modes such as transit. The remaining 811 trips will be external to the Project site, with 404 entering and 407 exiting the site during the PM peak hour. Brickell Mainstreet Traffic Impact Study 17 October 1999 v Table 6 separates the pass -by trips from the total external trips accessing the Project site to determine the net new trips that will be added to the roadways in the study area. Table 6: Brickell Mainstreet Net New Trip Generation Land Use Total External Trips Entering Exiting Pass -By Trip % Pass -By Trips Net New Trips Entering Exiting Hotel 30 42 - - 30 42 Retail 278. 301 36% 208 178 193 Restaurant 96 64 43% 77 55 28 Total 404 407 - 285 263 263 As shown in Table 6, 285 of the external trips generated by the Project during the PM peak hour can be expected to be pass -by trips. The remaining 526 trips will be new to the roadways in the study area, with 263 entering and 263 exiting the Project site. Trip Distribution In order to determine which roadways and intersections would be impacted by Project trips, it is necessary to determine their probable paths. The Miami Urban Area Transportation Study (MUATS) model is used to forecast future year trips on the transportation network in Miami -Dade County. Among other capabilities, the MUATS model provides origin -destination information for each area in • the County. The Project trip distribution was based on a cardinal distribution provided by the MUATS model for Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) 674, which is provided below in Table 7. Table 7: Cardinal Trip Distribution Cardinal Direction Percentage of Trips North - Northeast 22% East - Northeast 7% East — Southeast 1 % South - Southeast 1 % South — Southwest 8% West,— Southwest 20% West — Northwest 21% North - Northwest 20% Total 100% Trip Assignment Project traffic was routed through the study intersections and roadway segments during the PM peak hour based upon the cardinal trip distribution. In particular, the paths for inbound and outbound trips will differ because of the street network in the study area, which contains several one-way pairs. Project traffic was then added to the "background" traffic to yield future PM peak hour traffic volumes with the Project, which are illustrated in Figure 5. • Brickell Moinstreet Traffic Impact Study 18 October 1999 U�c SW 7th Stre SW 8th Stre SW 13th St i et et reet �� k-138 ~1269 Q Q Q Q 41 " = k-119 cv = B 1 M et et reet �� k-138 ~1269 �� 115 k— 41 " = k-119 57-109 1 -4-985 %t ^._ k-329 k► 124 1 180 t 118 �► N 911—► �� 296 — ♦ (W 172 110 � 318 N l �N l� 70 ��84 N^N f-316 1 54 SW 10th Street 159 41 63--*la� 23 N,o(• JQ' Q 1fi ^^^ k-160 '�� ��� '� 126 j^j/il 300 �,�,�► 1512 � 190 J-6 I + 41 �' �►36 481--� ��� 623' 519—� �t� 246=t. w 5� ^°�H M� 45� �a� 131 I "ZZ4 N Brickell Mainstreet Traffic Impact Study Figure Future (200 1) PM Peak Hour Volumes With Project 5 0 • FUTURE (2001) TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE WITH PROJECT The study intersections and roadway segments were analyzed for level of service on the basis of future traffic volumes with the Project. Detailed intersection performance calculations are included in Appendix F, of which a summary is provided in Table 8. n Table 8: Future (2001) PM Peak Hour Intersection Performance with Project Intersection Level of Service Volume/Capacity SW 7'h Street at SW 2"d Avenue C+ 0.76 SW 7' Street at SW 1St Avenue C+ 0.77 S7 1h Street at S Miami Avenue C+ 0.64 SE 7'h Street at Brickell Avenue D 0.83 SW 8'h Street at SW 2nd Avenue B 0.53 SW 8'h Street at SW 1St Avenue B 0.47 .S 8'h Street at S Miami Avenue B 0.61 SE 8'h Street at Brickell Avenue E+ 1 0.82 11, SW 9'h Street at SW 1 St Avenue C 2 NA S 9'' Street at S Miami Avenue C z NA (31 SE 9th Street at SE 15' Avenue AM NA(3) SW 10'' Street at SW 1St Avenue D(2) NA S 10'h Street at S Miami Avenue F z NA SE 10'h Street at SE 15' Avenue C NA 13) SW 13'h Street at SW 2"d Avenue D 0.91 SW 13'h Street at SW 1St Avenue B+ 0.62 S 13'~' Street at S Miami Avenue B 0.77 SE 13'' Street at Brickell Avenue D+ 1 0.76(1) (1) The performance analysis assumed improvements would be implemented (2) Represents the Level of Service of the worst approach of a two-way stop controlled intersection (3) Volume/Capacity is not calculated for unsignalized intersections As shown in Table 8, only two intersections are expected to operate below LOS D. If the improvements identified in the Future 42001) Trahic Performance without Project section of this study are implemented, the performance of the intersection of SW 8'h Street at Brickell Avenue can be expected to be LOS E+. These improvements include signal modifications and restriping. The unsignalized intersection of S 10'h Street and S Miami Avenue is expected to operate at LOS F. The performance of this intersection could be improved substantially with the installation of a traffic signal. Therefore, a detailed signal warrant analysis is recommended to determine if the installation of a traffic signal is justified. Arterial link performance was initially based upon the maximum service volumes provided in the FDOT's 1998 Leve/of Service Handbook. If it was determined that a link was operating below LOS D based upon this methodology, a more refined analysis was performed utilizing the ART -PLAN software. Results of the analysis are presented in Table 9. Brickell Mainstreet Traffic Impact Study October 1999 G�- 0' 1�_ 20 CJ • Table 9: Future (2001) PM Peak Hour Link Performance with Project Roadway Link Level of Service SW 7'' Street between SW 2"d Avenue and SW i"Avenue B D , SW 7' Street between SW 1"Avenue and S Miami Avenue B D , SE 7'' Street between S Miami Avenue and Brickell Avenue (WB) D , SW 8' Street between SW 2nd Avenue and SW 1"Avenue EB D , SW 8' Street between SW 1"Avenue and S Miami Avenue EB D , SE 8' Street between S Miami Avenue and Brickell Avenue EB D , SW 9' Street between SW 1"Avenue and S Miami Avenue (WB) C , SE 9'' Street between S Miami Avenue and SE 15' Avenue B D , SE 9'' Street between S Miami Avenue and SE 15} Avenue EB C , SW 10'' Street between SW 15' Avenue and S Miami Avenue B C , SW 10' Street between SW 15' Avenue and S Miami Avenue EB D , SE 10'' Street between S Miami Avenue and SE 1' Avenue B D , SE 10' Street between S Miami Avenue and SE I" Avenue EB C , SW 13' Street between SW 2nd Avenue and SW 1' Avenue B E z SW 13'' Street between SW 2"d Avenue and SW I" Avenue EB C z SW 13't' Street between SW 1"Avenue and S Miami Avenue B D s SW 13'x' Street between SW 151 Avenue and S Miami Avenue EB C z SE 13'x' Street between S Miami Avenue and Brickell Avenue (WB) E z SE 13't' Street between S Miami Avenue and Brickell Avenue EB FM SW 2"d Avenue between SW 7' Street and SW 8' Street NB C , SW 2"d Avenue between SW 7" Street and SW 8" Street SB C , SW 2"d Avenue between SW 8" Street and SW 13't' Street (NB) D , SW 2"d Avenue between SW 8t' Street and SW 13'x' Street SB D , SW 1"Avenue between SW 7'h Street and SW 8' Street SB C , SW 1"Avenue between SW 8" Street and SW 13't' Street SB C , S Miami Avenue between SW 7" Street and SW 8" Street (NB) C , S Miami Avenue between SW 8' Street and SW 13' Street SB C , SE 15' Avenue between SE 8'h Street and SE 10'� Street NB C , SE 15' Avenue between SE 8'' Street and SE 10" Street SB C , Brickell Avenue between SE 7'h Street and SE 8't' Street (NB) F 2 Brickell Avenue between SE 7' Street and SE 8'' Street SB F (21 Brickell Avenue between SE 8'' Street and SE 13't' Street NB D z Brickell Avenue between SE 8" Street and SE 13'' Street SB DO (1) Based upon maximum service volume thresholds provided in FDOT's 1998 Level of Service Handbook (2) Based upon results of ART -PLAN analysis As shown in Table 9, the vast majority of the study links are expected to continue to operate at or above LOS D with the addition of Project traffic. However, the performance of several links along S 13'h Street between SW 2nd Avenue and Brickell Avenue are expected to be below LOS D. As mentioned in the Future X2001% Traffic Performance without Projectsection of this study, the widening of this link is not feasible. However, improvements to the intersection of SE 13" Street and Brickell • Avenue are recommended. The improvements include modifying the traffic signal to provide a right- Bricketl Mainstreet Traffic Impact Study 21 October 1999 0 turn arrow for the eastbound right -turn lane to allow this movement to move concurrently with the . northbound left -turn movement. The performance of both the northbound and southbound links along Brickell Avenue between SE 7'' Street and. SE 8'h Street is expected to be LOS F. As mentioned in the Future X2007/ TrofflC Performance without Project section of this study, the widening of this link of Brickell Avenue is not feasible. However, improvements to the intersection of Brickell Avenue and SE 8'h Street are recommended. The improvements were identified for the eastbound and westbound approaches to the intersection, but their implementation will allow more of the signal's green time to be allocated to the northbound and southbound approaches. Finally, results of the ART -PLAN analysis indicates that the longer segment of Brickell Avenue between SE 7'' Street and SE 13'h Street will operate at LOS D in the northbound direction and LOS E southbound direction. CIRCULATION AROUND THE PROJECT SITE Vehicular Circulation Access to the. Project's on-site parking will be provided along both SW 9'h Street and SW 10'h Street. SW 91h Street is presently one-way westbound between SW 1" Avenue and S Miami Avenue. It is recommended that this segment of SW 9'h Street be converted to two-way operation. This will make this segment consistent with the segment of SE 9'h Street between S Miami Avenue and SE 1" Avenue and minimize circuity in the area. The conversion .of SW 9'h Street to two-way traffic operation could be accomplished within the existing right-of-way. However, it may require the elimination of some on -street parking. This mitigation would substantially improve the traffic flow in the area immediately surrounding the Project by reducing the circuity required to access the Project site. Pedestrian Circulation Pedestrian traffic volumes were collected at the study intersections. The conflicts between vehicles and pedestrians are not significant at the existing traffic volumes. Table 10 summarizes the pedestrian traffic at the study intersections in closest proximity to the Project site during the afternoon peak hour: Table 10: Pedestrian Traffic in Study Area Intersection Direction NB SB EB WB TOTAL SW 91h Street at SW 15' Avenue 182 12 21 24 239 SW 10'' Street at SW 1"Avenue 46 37 0 6 89 SE 91h Street at SE 1"Avenue 4 66 4 0 74 SE 10'h Street at SE 15' Avenue 25 1 5 26 57 J.S 101h Street at S Miami Avenue 0 17 4 0 1 21 S 9'h Street at S Miami Avenue 5 9 0 0 14 Brickell Mainstreet Traffic Impact Study October 1999 CO- 22 • The largest volume, 239 pedestrians in one hour, was observed at the intersection of SW 9'' Street at SW 151 Avenue. This volume of pedestrians originates at the Brickell Metrorail station. This is a "T" intersection of two one-way streets. SW 151 Avenue flows one-way in the southbound direction, while SW 9th Street flows one-way in the westbound direction. The intersection is presently unsignalized. The vehicular volume in the southbound direction is approximately 450 vehicles/hour (vph). This volume translates to an average of 7.5 vehicles per minute, or gaps of 8 seconds between vehicles. This gap size is adequate for eastbound -westbound pedestrian crossings. In particular, the largest movement observed at the intersection of SW 9'h Street and SW 15' Avenue'was in the northbound direction. That movement of pedestrians is assisted by two conditions: a) the . westbound movement is controlled by a STOP sign; and b) the westbound traffic indicates a volume of only. 150 vph (which translates to gaps of approximately24 seconds). The second largest pedestrian volume is found at the intersection SW 10'h Street at SW 151 Avenue. The main pedestrian volumes at this location are in the north -south direction. .The geometry is similar to that on SW 1" Avenue at SW 101h Street, although SW 101fi Street, is a two-way street. Therefore, a similar analysis applies. The intersection of SE 9'~' Street at SE 151 Avenue indicates approximately. 66 pedestrians in the southbound direction. This pedestrian volume is likely to have originated at the Metromover Station between SE 9th and SE 10' Streets. Again, this is a "T" intersection with light (93 vph) vehicular traffic that provides plenty of opportunities for pedestrian crossing. The intersection on SE 10'' Street at SE 1st Avenue shows pedestrian volumes around 25 • pedestrians/hour in the northbound and westbound directions. This volume is also likely to originate at the Metromover station between SE 9'' and SE 10'h Streets. The vehicular volumes at both legs of the intersection do not exceed 410 vph. This provides adequate conditions for pedestrian crossing. • The project is also expected to generate pedestrian traffic, although the exact volume is unknown. The Project will have land uses located on either side of S Miami Avenue between S 9" and S 101h Streets. To minimize pedestrian traffic at the ground level, the Project will provide a pair of pedestrian bridges over Miami Avenue connecting the two sites. As mentioned previously, the vehicular traffic performance analyses indicates that the intersection of S Miami Avenue and S 10' Street may operate at LOS F with the addition of Project traffic. Under these conditions, the signalization of the intersection should be studied. If the traffic signal warrant analysis concludes that signalization is warranted, then the overall conditions for pedestrian movement will . improve in the vicinity of the Project after the installation of a traffic signal at this intersection. Brickell Mainstreet Traffic Impact Study 23 October 1999 1�1 C ® RECOMMENDATIONS FOR IMPROVEMENTS With the growth in background traffic some study intersections will experience changes in traffic performance. Adjustments to the signal phasing should allow the majority of the study intersections to continue to operate at or above LOS E. However, further improvements are recommended at several of the study intersections to improve operation. In order to maintain LOS E at the intersection of SE 8'h Street and Brickell Avenue several improvements are recommended. The westbound approach to the intersection should be restriped to consist of 1 left -turn lane and 2 right -turn lanes. The eastbound approach to the intersection should be restriped to consist of 1 left -turn lane, 1 shared left-turn/through lane, 1 shared through/right-turn lane and 1 right - turn lane. Additionally, the traffic signal should be modified to provide a right -turn arrow for the westbound right -turn lanes to allow this movement to move concurrently with the southbound left -turn movement. Several improvements are also recommended for the intersection of SE 13't' Street and Brickell Avenue. The intersection's westbound approach should be restriped to consist of 1 left -turn lane, 1 through lane and 1 shared through/right-turn lane. A protected phase should be provided for the northbound left - turn movement. The traffic signal should be modified to provide a right -turn arrow for the eastbound right -turn lane to allow this movement to move concurrently with the northbound left -turn movement. The traffic signal should also be modified to provide a right -turn arrow for the southbound right -turn lane to allow this movement to move concurrently with the eastbound movement. It should be stressed that the improvements to these two intersections are warranted even without the . addition of traffic expected to be generated by this Project. The improvements are required to absorb the cumulative impact of the continued growth of traffic in the region and, specifically, the traffic associated with several committed developments within the study area. • The unsignalized intersection of S 10" Street and S Miami Avenue is expected to operate at LOS F. The future performance of the intersection of S 10'h Street and S Miami Avenue could be improved substantially with the installation of a traffic signal. Therefore, a detailed signal warrant analysis is recommended to determine if the installation of a traffic signal is justified. If the intersection satisfies the signal warrant analysis, a traffic signal should installed at this location. Finally, as mentioned in the previous section the segment of SW 91h Street between SW 1" Avenue and S Miami Avenue should be converted to a two-way operation. This will make this segment consistent with SE 9'h Street. This mitigation would substantially improve the traffic flow in the area immediately surrounding the Project by reducing the circuity required to access the Project site. Brickell Mainstreet Traffic Impact Study October 1999 CA, , 24 • APPENDIX A Traffic Counts • • 0- iss • Site Code : N -S Street: E -W Street: Location : 0 Study Name: 2AISPM Site Code.: 00000000 Start Date: 07/01/97 Page : 1 CARS,TRUCKS SW 2nd AVENUE ;SW 7th STREET ;SW 2nd AVENUE .;SW 7th STREET ;From North ;From East ;From South ;From West .Start ; ;Intvl. Time ; Right Thru left Other; Right Thru Left Other; Right Thru Left Other; Right Thru left Other; Total Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 16:00 on 07/01/97 to 17:45 on 07/01/97 Time 16:45 ; 16:45 ; 16:45 ; 16:45 Vol. ; 153 451 0 0; 97 1020 111 0; 0 312 176 0; 0 0 0 0 Pct. 25.3 74.6 0.0 0.0; 7.8 83.0 9.0 0.0; 0.0 63.9 36.0 0.0; 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0; Total 604 ; 1228 488 ; 0 High 17:00 ; 17:00 ; 17:30 17:30 Vol. 45 127 0 0; 27 320 35 0; 0 74 55 C 0 0 0 0 Total ; 172 ; 382 ; 129 ; 0 ; PHF 0.877 ; 0.803 ; 0.945 0.000 CARS TRUCKS SW 7th STREE 153 1349 1020 176 SW 2nd AVENUE 153 451 0 0 0 0 153 0 0 0 Inbound 0 Outbound 1349 0 Total 1349 0 0 0 0 0 451 0 Inbound 604 Outbound 409 Total 1013 97 312 409 97 0 97 1020 0 1020 Inbound 1228 Outbound 0 111 Total 1228 0 111 Inbound 488 SW 7th STREET Outbound 562 Total 1050 451 176 312 0 0 111 0 0 0 0 562 176 312 0 0 North SW 2nd AVENUE • Site Code : N -S Street: E -W Street: Location : CARS,TRUCKS Study Name: 2A7SPM Site Code : OOOOO000 Start Date: 07/01/97 Page : 2 SW 2nd AVENUE ;SW 7th STREET ;SW 2nd AVENUE ;SW 7th STREET ;From North ;From East ;From South ;FT01 West Start i . i i i :Intvl. Time Right Thru Left Other; Right Thru Left Other; Right Thru Left Other; Right Thru left Other; Total 265 SW 2nd AVENUE 265 803 0 175 0 0 0 722 ==== ===== ===== 897 265 803 0 Inbound 1068 Outbound 897 Total 1965 2402 1809 328 0 0 0 ® Inbound 0 Outbound 2402 0 Total 2402 0 0 0 0 0 Inbound 1050 Outbound 1000 Total 2050 803 328 722 197 0 0' 1000 328 722 SW 2nd AVENUE Inbound 2181 Outbound 0 Total 2181 0 175 1809 0 1809 197 0 197 SW 7th STREET 0 0 0 0 0 0 North 0- 188) Site Code : N -S Street: E-14 Street: Location : Study Name: 2A7SPM Site Code : 00000000 Start Date: 07/01/97 Page : 1 Gn- 10, CARS,TRUCKS ;SW 2nd AVENUE ;SW 7th STREET ;SW 2nd AVENUE ;SW 7th STREET ;From North ;From East ;From South ;From West Start ;Intvl. Time Right Thru Left Other' Right Thru left Other' Right Thru Left Other' Right Thru Left Other' Total 07/01/97 16:00; 24 104 0 0; 19 200 21 0; 0 142 44 0; 0 0 0 0; 554 16:15; 34 71 0 0; 9 186 22 0; 0 98 32 0; 0 0 0 0; 452 16:30; 33 . 73 0 0; 24 199 13 0; 0 90 33 0; 0 0 0 0; 465 16:45; 46 114 0 0; 19 196 15 01 0 88 38 0; 0 0 0 0; S16 Hour; 137 362 0 0; 71 781 71 0; 0 418 147 0; 0 0 0 0; 1987 17:00; 45 127 0 0; 27 320 35 0; 0 76 44 C 0 0 0 0; 674 17:15; 29 99 0 0; 26 288 36 0; 0 74 39 0; 0 0 0 0; 591 17:30; 33 111 0 0; 25 216 25 0; 0 74 55 0; 0 0 0 0; 539 11.45; 21 104 0 C 26 204 30 0; 0 80 43 0; 0 0 0 0; 508 Hour; 128. 441 0 0; 104 1028 126 0; 0 304 181 0; 0 0 0 0; 2312 Total; 265 803 0 0; 175 1809 197 0; 0 722 328 0; 0 0 0 0; 4299 % Apr. 24.8 75.1 - -; 8.0 82.9 9.0 -; - 68.7 31.2- 2 Int. 6.1 18.6 - -; 4.0 42.0 4.5 -; - 16.7 7.6 Gn- 10, Site Code : N -S Street: E -W Street: Location : CARS,TRUCKS Study Name: 1A7SPM Site Code : 00000000 Start Date: 06/26/97 Page .: I SW 1st AVENUE ;SW 7th STREET ;SW 1st AVENUE ;SW 7th STREET ;From North ;From East ;from South ;From West Start ;Intvl. Time ; Right Thru Left Other; Right Thru Left Other; Right Thru Left Other, Right Thru Left Other Total Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 16:00 on 06/26/97 to 17:45 on 06/26/97 Time 17:00 17:00 ; 17:00 17:00 Vol. ; 241 296 0 0; 0 1045 90 0; 0. 0 0 0; 0 0 0 0 Pct. 44.8 55.1 0.0 0.0; 0.0 92.0 7.9 0,0; 0.0 .0.0 0.0 0.0; 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total 537 ; 1135 ; 0 0 ; High 17:15 ; 17:15 ; 17:15 ; 17:15 Vol. ; 73 74 0 0; 0 327 31 0; 0 0 0 0; 0 0 0 0; Total 147 ; 358 0 0 PHF 0.913 ; 0.792 0.000 0.000 CARS TRUCKS W 7t 241 1286 1045 SW 1: 241 0 241 ;t AVENUE 289 0 7 0 296 0 Inbound 537 Outbound 0 Total 537 0 0 0 Inbound 0 Inbound 1135 outbound 1286 Outbound 0 0 Total 1286 Total 1135 0 0 0 0 0 Inbound 0 Outbound 386 Total 386 296 01 0 0 90 0 0 0 386 .0 0 0 SW 1st AVENUE 0 0 0 1041 4 1045 83 7 90 SW 7th STREET • • Site.Code : Study Name: 1A7SPN N -S Street: Site Code : 00000000 E -'.J Street: Start Date: 06/26/97 Location : Page 2 CARS,TRUCKS SW 1st AVENUE ;SW 7th STREET ;SW 1st AVENUE ;SW 7th STREET ;From. North ;From East ;From South ;From West Start ; ;Intvl. Time Right Thru left Other' Right Thru left Other; Right Thru Left Other' Right Thru left Other' Total CARS SW 1st AVENUE TRUCKS 375 463 0 2 12 0 377 475 0 Inbound 852. Outbound 0 SW 7th STREET Total .852 377 2227 1850 0 ® 0 0 Inbound 0 Outbound 2227 0 Total 2227 0 0 0 0 0 • Inbound 0 Outbound 628 Total 628 475 O 0 153 0 0 628 0 0 SW 1st AVENUE Inbound 2003 Outbound 0 Total 2003 0 0 1839 11 1850 137 16 153 SW 7th STREET 0 0 0 0 0 0 North } • GG-' • Site Code : Study Name: IA7SPM N-5 Street: Site Code : 00000000 E -W Street: Start Date: 06/26/97 Location Page : 1 CARS,TRUCKS :SW 1st AVENUE :SW 7th STREET :SW 1st AVENUE :SW 7th STREET :From North :From East :From South :From West Start 1 :Intvl. Time 1 Right Thru left Other: Right Thru left Other' Right Thru left Other; Right Thru left Other: Total 06/26/97 16:00: 27 36 0 C 0 186 18 01 0 0 0 0: 0 0 0 0: 267 16:151 26 27 0 01 0 215 10 01 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 01 278 16:301 41 55 0 01 0 202 18 01 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 01 316 16:45; 42 61 0 01 0 202 17 01 0 0 0 0; 0 0 0 0; 322 Hour: 136 179 0 01 0 805 63 01 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 01 1183 17:001 55 58 0 01 0 275 17 0: 0 0 0 0: 0 0 0 0: 405 17:151 73 74 0 01 0 327 31 0: 0 0 0 0: 0 0 0 01 505 17:301 60 81 0 01 0 227 27 0: 0 0 0 0: 0 0 0 01 395 17:451 53 83 0 01 0 216 15 01 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 01 367 Hour: 241 296 0 01 0 1045 90 0: 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0: 1672 Total: 377 475 0 01 0 1850 153 01 0 0 0 0: 0 0 0 0: 2855 t Apr.: 44.2 5S.7 - -: - 92.3 7.6 -1 - - - -: - - - -1 - Int. 1 13.2 16.6 - -1 - 64.7 5.3 • GG-' • • Site Code : N -S Street: E -W Street: Location CARS,TRUCKS Study Name: MAISPM Site Code : 00000000 Start Date: 07/01/97 Page : 1 ;SW 7TH STREET ;MIAMI AVENUE ; ;From North ;From East ;From South ;From West Start ; ;Intvl. Time Right Thru Left Other; Right Thru Left Other; Right Thru Left Other; Right Thru Left Other; Total Peak Hour Analysis 8y Entire Intersection for the Period: 16:00 on 07/01/97 to 17:45 on 07/01/97 Time 17:00 ; 17:00 ; 17:00 ; 17:00 ; Vol. 0 0 0 0; 35 725 0 0; 0 423 362 0; 0 0 0 0 Pct. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0; 4.6 95.3 0.0 0.0; 0.0 53.8 46.1 0.0; 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total ; 0 ; 760 ; 785 ; 0 High 16:-1 17:00 17:00 17:00 ; Vol. ; 0 0 0 0; 12 224 0 0; 0 105 107 C 0 0 0 0 Total 0 236 212 0 PHF ; 0.000. 0.805 ; 0.925 0.000 ; 725 1087 362 0 0 0 35 0 0 0 423 ___= ===== ===== 458 0 0 0 Inbound 0 Outbound 458 Total 458 0 0 0 Inbound 0 ------Outbound 1087 0 Total 1087 0 0 0 0 0 0 35 725 0 725 Inbound 760 Outbound 0 0 Total 760 0 0 Inbound 785 Outbound 0 Total 785 362 423 00 0 0 0 0 362 423 0 0 MIAMI AVENUE SW 7TH STREET North ® Site Code : N -S Street: E -W Street: Location : • • • CARS,TRUCKS • Study Name: MA7SPM Site Code : 00000000 Start Date: 07/01/97 Page 2 ;SW 7TH STREET ;MIAMI AVENUE ;From North ;From East ;From South ;From West Start ; ; ;Intvl. Time Right Thru left Other; Right Thru Left Other; Right Thru left Other; Right Thru Left Other; Total 0 0 0 48 0 0 0 689 ____ _____ _____ 737 0 0 0 Inbound 0 Outbound 737 Total 737 1314 1864 550 0 0 0 Inbound 0 Outbound 1864 0 Total 1864 0 0 0 0 0 Inbound 1239 Outbound 0 Total 1239 550 688 0 1 550 689 MIAMI AVENUE 0 48 1314 0 1314 Inbound 1362 Outbound 0 0 Total 1362 0 0 SW 7TH STREET North �* �r*� C`�r s 60— 188 Site Code : Study Name: MA7SPM N -S Street: Site Code : 00000000 E -W Street: Start Date: 07/01/97 Location Page : 1 CARS,TRUCKS :SW 7TH STREET :MIAMI AVENUE ;From North :From East :From South :From West Start ; :Intvl. Time Right Thru Left Other; Right Thru left Other; Right Thru Left Other: Right Thru Left Other; Total .07/01/91 16:00: 0 0 0 0: 2 149 0 0: 0 55 35 0: 0, 0 0 0: 241 16:15: 0 0 0 0: 3 171 0 0: 0 84 41 0: 0 0 0 0: 299 16:30: 0 0 0 0: 2 163 0 0: 0 55 55 0: 0 0 0 0: 275 16:451 0 0 0 0; 6 106 0 0; 0 72 57 0; 0 0 0 01 241 Hour: 0 . 0 0 01 13 589 0 0: 0 266 188 0: I 0 0 0 0: 1056 1 17:001 0 0 0 i 01 12 224 0 I I 01 0 105 107 I 01 0. 0 0 1 01 448 17:151 0 0 0 01 11 194 0 01 0 115 90 01 0 0 0 0: 410 17:30: 0 0 0 01 6 162 0 01 0 121 90 01 0 0 0 01 379 17:45: 0 0 0 0; 6 145 0 01 0 82 75 01 0 0 0 0: 308 Hour: 0 0 0 01 35 725 0 01 0 423 362 01 0 0 0 01 1545 I I 1 I I I I I Total: 0 0 0 I 0: 48 1314 0 .0: 0 689 550 0: 0 0 0 01 2601 t APT, : - - - -: 3.5 96.4 - -1 - 55.6 44.3- X Int.: - - - -: 1.8 50.5 - -: - 26.4 21.1 I I I I I 1 60— 188 • • • Site Code : N -S Street: E -W Street: Location : CARS,TRUCKS Study Name: BA7SPM Site Code : 00000000 Start Date: 07/15/97 Page I ;BRICKELL AVENUE ;SW 7TH STREET ;BRICKELL AVENUE ;SW 7TH STREET ;From North ;From East ;From South ;From West Start ;Intvl. Time Right Thru Left Other; Right Thru Left Other; Right Thru Left Other; Right Thru .Left Other; Total Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 16:00 on 07/15/97 to 17:45 on 01/15/97 Time 17:00 ; 17:00 ; 17:00 ; 17:00 ;. Vol. 202 1032 10 O; 105 289 96 0; 0 973 447 0; 0 0 0 0 Pct. 16.2 82.9 0.8 0.0; 21.4 58.9 19.5 0.0; 0.0 68.5 31.4 0.0; 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total 1244 490 ; 1420 ; 0 High 17:15 ; 17:15 ; 17:15 17:15 . Vol. 64 287 1 0; 33 111 35 0; 0 285 137 0; 0 0 0 0 Total 352 .179 422 ; 0 PHF 0.883 0.684 ; 0.841 0.000 202 938 289 447 0 0 0 Inbound Outbound 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 BRICKELL AVENUE 199 1020 10 105 3 12 0 973 _--- ----- ===== 1078 202 1032 10 Inbound 1244 Outbound 1078 Total 2322 0 938 938 Inbound 1420 Outbound 1128 Total 2548 1032 4401 957 96 7 16 1128 447 973 BRICKELL AVENUE Inbound 490 Outbound 10 Total 500 105 0 105 289 0. 289 96 0 96 10 10 SW 7TH STREET 0 0 0 0 G 0 .North Site Code : N -S Street' E -W Street: Location .: CARS,TRUCKS Study Name: BOSPA Site Code : 00000000 Start Date: 07/15/97 Page : 1 ;BRICKELL AVENUE ;SW 7TH STREET ;BRICKELL AVENUE ;SW 7TH STREET ;From North ;From East ;From South ;From West Start ; ; ;Intvl. Time ; Right Thru left Other; Right Thru left Other; Right Thru Left Other; Right Thru Left Other; Tota! 07/15/97 ; 16:00; 49 158 7 0; -5 18 5 0; 0 194 84 0; 0 0 0 0; 520 16:15; 25 143 1 0; 3 18 9 0; 0 164 55 0; 0 0 0 O; 428 16:30; 36 227 7 0; 7 29 6 O; 0 229 115 0; 0 0 0 0; 656 16:45; 40 227 2 0; 6 31 7 0; 0 237 96 0; 0 0 0 0; 646 Hour; 150 755 17 O; 21 96 27 0; 0 824 360 0; 0 0 0 0; 2250 17:00; 43 217 3 0; 23 53 18 0; 0 239 103 0, 0 0 0 0; 699 17:15; 64 287 1 0; 33 111 35 0; 0 285 137 0; 0 0 0 0; 953 17:30; 47 275 . 3 0; 23 64 22 0; 0 246 98 0, 0 0 0 0; 778 17:45, 48 253 3 0; 26 61 21 0; 0 203 109. 0; 0 0 0 0; 724 } Hour; 202 1032 10 0; 105 289 96 0; 0 973 447 0; 0 0 0 0; 3154 Total; 352 1787 27 0; 126 385 123 0�: 0 1797 807 0; 0 0 0 0; 5404 % Apr. 16.2 82.5 1.2 -; 19.8 60.7 19.4 -; - 69.0 30.9 -; - - -- % Int. 6.5 33.0 0.4 -; 2.3 7.1 2.2 -; - 33.2 14.9 • 61`0- 188 • • Site Code : N -S Street: E-41 Street: Location : CARS,TRUCKS Study Name: BAISPM Site Code : 00000000 Start Date: 07/15/97 Page : 2 ;BRICKELL AVENUE ;SW 7TH STREET ;BRICKELL AVENUE ;SW 7TH STREET ;From North ;From East ;From South ;From West Start ; ;Intvl. Time Right Thru left Other; Right Thru Left Other; Right Thru Left Other; Right Thru Left Other; Total CARS TRUCKS SW 7TH STREET 352 1544 385 807 0 0 0 Inbound ----Outbound 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 BRICKELL AVENUE 344 1762 27 126 8 25 0 1797 ____ _____ _____ 1923 352 1787 27 Inbound 2166 Outbound 1923 Total 4089 0 1544 1544 Inbound 2604 Outbound 1910 Total 4514 1787 790 1757 123 17 4O 1910 807 1797 BRICKELL AVENUE Inbound Outbound Total 126 0 126 385 0 385 634 27 123 661 0 123 on 27 27 SW 7TH STREET North G�J • • • Site Code : N -S Street: E -W Street: Location : 0 , 0 CARS,TRUCKS Study Name: 2A8SPM Site Code : 00000000 Start Oate: 07/01/97 Page . I SW 2nd AVENUE ;SW 8th STREET ;SW 2nd AVENUE ;SW 8th STREET ;From North ;From East ;From South ;From West Start ; ;Intvl., Time ; Right Thru Left Other; Right Thru left Other; Right Thru left Other; Right Thru left Other; Total Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 16:00 on 07/01/97 to 17:4S on 07/01/97 ; Time 17:00 ; 17:00 ; 17:00 ; 17:00 Vol. ; 0 460 110 0; 0 0 0 0; 18 376 0 0; 104 623 109 0 Pct. ; 0.0 80.7 19.2 0.0; 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0; 4.5 95.4 0.0 0.0; 12.4 74.5 13.0 0.0 Total 570 0 ; 394 836 ; High 17:00 ; 17:00 ; 17:30 17:45 Vol. 0 131 31 0; 0 0 0 0; 4 104 0 0; 22 166 30 0 Total ; 162 ; 0 108 218 ; PHF 0.879 ; 0.000 ; 0.912 ; 0.958 109 109 0 Inbound Outbound 623 Total 623 0 10`4 104 0 SW 2nd AVENUE 0 460 110 376 0 0 0 109 0 460 110 485 Inbound 570 Outbound 485 Total 1055 836 0 836 Inbound 394 Outbound 564 Total 958 104 0 376 460 0 0 564 ===== ===== 0 376 SW 2nd AVENUE Inbound 0 Outbound 751 Total 751 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 623 110 SW 8th 18 0 0 0 18 0 North 751 STREET Go- 188 0 i •Site Code : Study Name: 2A8SPM N75 Street: Site Code : 00000000 E -W Street: Start Date: 07/01/97 Location Page 2 CARS,TRUCKS SW 2nd AVENUE ;SW 8th STREET ;SW 2nd AVENUE ;SW 8th STREET :From North ;From East ;From South ;From West Start ;;Intvl. Time Right Thru left Other; Right Thru Left Other; Right Thru Left Other; Right Thru Left Other; Total 249 249 0 SW 2nd AVENUE 0 801 202 801 0 0 0 249 ---- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- 0 801 202 1050 Inbound 1003 Outbound 1050 Total 2053 Inbound 1705 ---Outbound 0 1252 Total 1705 1252 0 204 204 0 • Inbound 849 Outbound 1005 Total 1854 204 0 801 801. 0 01 1005 =____ 0 801 SW 2nd AVENUE 0 0 0 0 0 0 Inbound 0 Outbound 1502 0 Total 1502 0 0 48 0 0 0 48 0 48 1252 1502 202 SW 8th STREET North • 00- 188 Site Code : Study Name: 2A8SPN N-5 Street: Site Code : 00000000 El Street: Start Date: 07/01/97 Location Page : 1 CARS,TRUCKS SW 2nd AVENUE ;SW 8th STREET ;SW 2nd AVENUE ;SW 8th STREET ;From North ;From East ;From South ;From West Start ;Intvl. Time Right Thru left Other; Right Thru left Other; Right Thru Left Other; Right Thru left Other; Total 07/01/97 16:00; 0 103 22 0; 0 0 0 0; 9 141 0 0; 35 155 45 0; 510 16:15; 0 72 21 0; 0 0 0 0; 13 96 0 0; 29 193 34 0; 458 16:30; 0 68. 18 0; 0 0 0 0; 4 84 0 0; 15 141 39 0; 369 16:451 0 98 31 0; 0 0 0 0; 4 104 0 0; 21 140 22 0; 420 Hour; 0 341 92 0; 0 0 0 0; I 30 425 0 0; I 100 629 140 O; 1757 I f 17:00; 0 131 31 I C 0 0 0 1 O; 4 96 0 1 0; 26 159 24 1 0; 471 17:15; 0 110 25 0; 0 0 0 0; S 83 0 0; 29 144 30 0; 426 17:30; 0 107 32 0; 0 0 0 0; 4 104 0 0; 27 154 25 0; 453 11'45; 0 112 22 0; 0 0 0 0; 5 93 0 01 22 166 30 01 450 Hour; 0 460 110 0; 0 0 0 0; 18 316 0 0; 104 623 109 0; 1800 I I 1 1 1 1 Total; 0 801 202 0; 0 0 0 O; 48 801 0 0; 204 1252 249 0; 3557 2 Apr. ; - 79.8 20.1 -; - - - -; 5.6 94.3 - -; 11.9 73.4 14.6- 2 Int. - 22.5 5.6 -; I - - - -; I 1.3 22.5 - -; I 5.7 35.1 7.0 -; - I • I I ' 1 t I 1 1 1 • 00- 188 0 0 Site Code : N-5 Street: E -W Street: Location : CARS,TRUCKS Study Name:.1A8SPN Site Code : 00000000 Start Date: 07/01/97 Page : 1 ;SW 1st AVENUE ; ;SW 1st AVENUE ;SW 8th STREET ;From North ;From East ;From South ;From West Start ;Intvl. Time Right Thru Left Other, Right Thru left Other; Right Thru left Other; Right Thru left Other; Total Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 16:0.0 on 07/01/97 to 17:45 on 01/01/97 ; Time 17:00 17:00 17:00 ; 17:00 Vol. 0 249 105 0; 0 0 0 0; 0 0 0 0; 99 721 0 0; Pct. ; 0.0 70.3 29.6 0.0; 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0; 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0; 12.0 87.9 0.0 0.0 Total ; 354 ; 0 0. ; 820 High 17:30 17:30 17:30 17:00 ; Vol. ; 0 64 32 0; 0 0 0 0; 0 0 0 0; 34 178 0 0 Total ; 96 ;. 0 ; 0 ; 212 PHF 0.921 ;. 0.000 ; 0.000 0.966 CARS TRUCKS SW 8 SW 1st AVENUE 0 239 103 M 0 0 0 Inbound 820 ^utbound 0 699 Total 820 721 22 94 99 5 249 105 Inbound 354 Outbound 0 Total 354 Inbound 0 Outbound 348 Total 348. 99 0 249 0 348 0 SW 1st AVENUE 0 0 0 Inbound 0 Outbound 826 Total 826 0 0 a 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 721 105 826 00- 188 • Site Code.: N -S Street: E -W Street: Location : CARS,TRUCKS L r Study Name: 1A8SPM Site Code : 00000000 Start Date: 01/01/91 Page : 2 SW 1st AVENUE ; ;SW 1st AVENUE ;SW 8th STREET ;From North ;From East ;From South ;From West Start ; ;Intvl. Time Right Thru Left Other; Right Thru left Other; Right Thru left Other; Right Thru Left Other; Total CARS SW 1st AVENUE TRUCKS 0 380 193 0 24 2 0 404 195 Inbound 599 Outbound 0 SW 8th STREET Total 599 0 0 0 • Inbound 1599 ^utbound 0 1350 Total 1599 1393 43 192 205 13 • Inbound 0 Outbound 609 Total 609 205 0 0 404 0 O 609 =____ _____ 0 0 SW 1st AVENUE Inbound 0 Outbound 1588 Total 1588 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1393 195 1588 North ®®- 188 so 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1393 195 1588 North ®®- 188 •Site Code : Study Name: IABSAN N -S Street: Site Code : 00000000 E -W Street: Start Date: 07/01/97 Location : page : 1 CARS,TRUCKS SW 1st AVENUE ; ;SW 1st AVENUE ;SW 8th STREET ;From North ;From East ;From South ;From West Start ;Intvl. Time Right Thru Left Other; Right Thru Left Other; Right Thru left Other; Right Thru Left Other; Total 07/01/97 16:00; 0 30 25 0; 0 0 0 0; 0 0 0 0; 23 181 0 0; 259 16:15: 0 38 24 C 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 0; 19 149 0 0, 230 16:30; 0 41 18 0; 0 0 0 0; 0 0 0 0; 29 170 0 0; 258 16:45; 0 46 23 0; 0 0 0 0; 0 0 0 0; 35 172 0 1; 211 Hour; 0 155 90 0; 0 0 0 0; 0 0 0 0; 106 672 0 1; 1024 17:00; 0 64 28 0; 0 0 0 0; 0 0, 0 0; 34 178 0 0; 304 17:15; 0 63 22 0; 0 0 0 0; 0 0 0 0; 23 173 0 0, 281 17:30; 0 64 32 0; 0 0 0 0; 0 0 0 0; 20 188 0 0, 304 17:45; 0 58 23 0; 0 0 0 0; 0 0 0 0; 22 182 0 0; 285 Hour; 0 249 105 0; 0 0 0 0; 0 0 0 O; 99 721 0 0; 1174 Total; 0 404 195 0; 0 0 0 0; 0 0 0 0; 205 1393 .0 1; 2198 % Apr. ; - 67.4 32.5 -; - - - - - - -; 12.8 87.1 -- t Int. - 18.3 8.8 9.3 63.3 - -; - F— 1 L J 0 •Site Code N -S Street: E -W Street: Location : • • CARS,TRUCKS • Study Name: MA8SPM Site Code : 00000000 Start Date: 06/26/97 Page : 1 ;MIAMI AVENUE ;SW 8TH STREET .;From North ;From East ;From South ;From West Start ; ;Intvl. Time ; Right Thru Left Other; Right Thru left Other; Right Thru Left Other; Right Thru left Other; Total Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 16:00 on 06/26/97 to 17:45 on 06/26/97 Time 17:00 ; 11:00 ; 17:00 1; 17:00 Vol. ; 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 0; 40 544 0 0; 0 640 197 0 Pct. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0; 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0; 6.8 93.1 0.0 0.0; 0.0 76.4 23.5 0.0 Total ; 0 0 584 837 High 16:-1 ; 16:-1 ; 17:00 ; 17:30 Vol. 0 0 0 0; 0 0 0 0; 8 153 0 0; 0 170 55 0 Total ; 0 ; 0 ; 161 ; 225 PHF 0.000 ; 0.000 0.906 ; 0.930 ; 0 0 0 0 40 0 0 0 192 197 5 Inbound 837 -----Outbound 0 633 Total 837 640 7 0 0 0 0 0 544 0 40 197 0 741 Inbound Outbound Total 0 741 741 Inbound 584 Outbound 0 Total 584 0 544 0 0 0 544 MIAMI AVENUE 0 0 0 0 0 Inbound 0 Outbound 680 0 Total 680 0 0 39 0 1 0 40 0 A ,O 40 640 680 North 0 • • • Site Code : Study Name: MA8SPM N -S Street: Site Code : 00000000 E -W Street: Start Date: 06/26/91 Location : Page 2 CARS,TRUCKS ;MIAMI AVENUE ;SW STH STREET ;From North ;From East ;From South ;From West Start ;Intvl. Time Right Thru Left Other, Right Thru Left Other; Right Thru Left Other, Right Thru Left Other; Total CARS TRUCKS 0 0 SW STH 0 0 876 0 0 324 0 0 1200 Inbound 0 Outbound 1200 Total 1200 0 0 0 0 315 0 0 324 9 Inbound 1589 Inbound 0 Outbound 0 Outbound 1333 0 1235 Total 1589 Total 1333 0 0 1265 30 68 0 1265 1333 0 0 Inbound 944 Outbound 0 Total 944 0 871 0 5 0 876 MIAMI AVENUE 65 0 3 0 68 0 North • Site Code : N-5 Street: El Street: Location : CARS,TRUCKS Study Name: MA8SPM Site Code : 00000000 Start Date: 06/26/97 Page : I • �- 18 ;MIAMI AVENUE ;SW 8TH STREET ;From North ;From East ;From South ;From West Start ;Intel. Time ; Right Thru Left Other; Right Thru left Other; Right Thru left Other; Right Thru left Other; Total 06/26/97 16:00; 0 0 0 0; 0 0 0 0; 10 11 0 0; 0 126 19 0; 232 16:15; 0 0 0 0; 0 0 0 0; 7 96 0 0; 0 168 31 0; 302 16:30; 0 0 0 0; 0 0 0 0; 5 75 0 0; 0 191 39 0; 310 16:45; 0 0 0 0; 0 0 0 0; 6 84 0 0; 0 140 38 0; 268 Hour; 0 0 0 0; 0 0 0 0; 28 332 0 0; 0 625 127 0; 1112 17:00; 0 0 0 0; 0 0 0 0; 8 153 0 0; 0 173 47 0; 381 17:15; 0 0 0. 0;, 0 0 0 0; 12 143 0 0; 0 151 50 0; 356 17:30; 0 0 0 0; 0 0 0 0; 10 120 0 0; 0 170 55 0; 355 11:45; 0 0 0 0; 0 0 0 0; 10 128 0 0; 0' 146 45 0; 329 Hour; 0 0 0 0; 0 0 0 0; 40 544 0 0; 0 640 197 0; 1421 Total; 0 0 0 0; 0 0 0 0; 68 876 0 0; 0 1265 324 0; 2533 Apr. - - - -; - - - -; 7.2 92.7 - -; - 79.6 20.3- k Int. ; - - - -; - - - -; 2.6 34.5 - -; - 49.9 12.7 -; - • �- 18 ' • Site Code :8A85TPM •N -S Street:BRICKELL AVENUE E -W Street:SOUTHWEST 8 STREET Location :MIAMI Peak Hot Time Vol. Pct. Total High Vol. Total PHF • • • CARS,TRUCKS 0. Study Name:. 8A8STPM Site Code : 00000000 Start Oate: 01/02/97 Page : 1 r Analysis By En ire Intersection for. the Period: 16:00 on 07/02/97 to 17:45 on 07/02/97 11:00 (S3 17:00 w3 11:00 ( ;11:00 E ' 0 955 146 0; 418 0 82 2; 123 74-- 0 0; 194 184 277 0 0.0 86.7 13.2 0.0; 59.5 0.0 40.1 0.2; 13.8 86.1 0.0 0.0; 29.6, 28.0 42.2 0.0 1101 702 ; 886 ; 655 17:45 ; 17:30 ; 17:45 ; 17:15 0 261 54 0; 122 0 60 0; 37 216 0 0; 54 50 74 0 315 ; 182 ; 253 ; 178 0.873 0.964 ; 0.875 ; 0.919 BRICXELL AVENUE 955 1458 146 T 2559 SOUTHWEST 8 STREET 2 277 07/92/97 418 85:00pM 184 05:45pM 655 3344 1155 282 194 —� 453 SOUTHWEST 8 STREET 2317 1431 763123 BRICKELL AVENUE Mft • is i • Site Code :8A8STPM N -S Street:BRICKELL AVENUE E -W Street:SOUTHWEST.8 STREET Location :MIAMI CARS,TRUCKS • Study Nave: 8A8STPM Site Code : 00000000 Start Date: 01/02/97 Page : I AVENUE ;SOUTHWEST 8 STREET ;BRICKELL AVENUE ;SOUTHWEST 8 STREET .18RICKELL ;Fro® North ',FTom East (From South ;From West Start ; IIntvl. Time Right Thru Left Other; Right Thru Left Other, Right Thru Left Other; Right Thru Left Other; Total 07/02/17 16:00; 2 152 46 0; 76 0 40 1; 34 177 0 0; 25 36 46_ 0; 635 16:15; 0 116 29 0; 77 0 47 0; 25 153 0 0; 35 42 48 0; 572 16:30; 0 191 35 0; 96 0 54 O; 27 174 0 0; 40 46 66 0; 729 16,W 0 182 32 O; 79 0 67 0; 38 185 0 01 46 51 52 0; 732 Hour; 2 641 142 01 328 0 208 11 I 124 689 0 0; I 146 175 212 O; 1 2668 I 17:00; 0 193 29 I 0; 108 0 55 1; 29 166 0 0; 50 55 69 01 755 17:15; 0 233 35 0; 101 0 74 1; 24 197 0 0; 54 50 74 0; 843 17:30; 0 268 28 0; 122 0 60 0; 33 184 0 0; 52 39 79 0; 865 17'451 0 261 54 0; 87 0 93 O; 37 216 0 01 38 40 55 0; 881 Hour1 0 955 146 01 418 0 282 21 123 763 0 01 194 184 277 01 3344 Total; 2 1596 288 01 746 0 490 3; 247 1452 1 0 01 340 359 489 01 6012 Apr. 1 0.1 84.6 15.2 -; 60.2 - 39.5 0.2; 14.5 85.4 - -1 28.6 30.2 41.1- t Int. 1 - 26.5 4.7 -1 12.4 - 8.1 -; 4.1 24.1 - -1 5.6 5.9 8.1- 1 I I lnbr,wid 0 Total 0 (J.'Itbol-Ind Tot r-,% 1 15 ISI I riboLUIG j 13 E3W 91+1 ST 17r -!t bo Uri ci A- Totzd. C,31 123li Qli 175 446 0 1 0 1 1 16 2.1 SCJ .LST q,'.JEPIUE Nor i 1i I 10/05/1999 10:05 305-233-7720 XROADS ENGINEERING PAGE 12 Ch'ISSFWS F-4EINEEPIN-6 DATA, IN-' CLIENT i CARR SMITH CORRADINO 3 3W "77H i Z 32c AVENUE, SUITE 2*7 'it udy. 4 . ue, SWIAVE9 .IDB M.: b-135 MIAMI, FLORIDA _C,06 Site C a a de : @S!099;?3 PROZ-'. WH MIAMI AVE DATA Mi LECT LON TEL: M5-�',333917 FAX: -1 -0 1.33 Start Dake; ol/3kiiii COUNT`" MIAMI-DADE Page A=,.1iEAVY VEHICLE iSW IST AVENUE I SW 4T,4 ST ISW 1ST AY M. i8W 9TH ST lFroe North lFroz East :Foca South JFrcs West 1r.tv1. ise i Rjqht Trru Left FEDS! Rich* Thru Left PEDSi Richt Thru Leftn8 PE I Right Thru Loft PEDS I Total Pea� Hour Analysis BV,Entire _ intersection for the Period: 16;0 u ri k'*/J&95 to 1`:45 on 0913099 Tine i 17:N 17:00 1 17r0@ i vol. 1 0 325 2 121 1 2 123 241 1 PC: i 0.0 95.8 0.5 3.51 Q. 6 1.3 82.0 16.81 015 0.0 0.8 99.41 0.0 0.0 let.m Total 1 335 1 183 1 17115 1 1T.3Q 117:00 I I't %30 I -. I or 89 0 71 0 0 45 71 1 0 0 591 a .0 a 71 T L, t -0 1 1 36 _F 1 0.883 I Q. 7i 1 i 0.762 S�4 I S, F:41)ENUE 11E -"')4Y VEH I CI -E Ell n b;j tt I I d L) I t (b L, Lt n d 1 W -2 1 H I RMIK'NA Z; To tA I lnbr,wid 0 Total 0 (J.'Itbol-Ind Tot r-,% 1 15 ISI I riboLUIG j 13 E3W 91+1 ST 17r -!t bo Uri ci A- Totzd. C,31 123li Qli 175 446 0 1 0 1 1 16 2.1 SCJ .LST q,'.JEPIUE Nor i 1i I [7 • 10/05/1999 10:05 305-233-7720 CLIENT : CARR SMITH CORRkD:NC JOB W.: 5r-135 KOJECT: SOUTH MIAMI AVE DATA COLLECTION WUNTY : MIAMI-DADE XROADS ENGINEERING PAGE 11 CA05S-W5 ENGINEERING DATA, IRC 1= SW 137TH AYEK , SUITE EV StudY Nate: SWIAVE3 rIPlI1, FLORIDA 33156 Site Code : 29389323 FAX: U5-233-7720 Start fate: WN/95 Page i AUfl)? iERYY dH1C'LE SW IST A7ENUE 4 SW 3 ;�{ 5T 1 SId l5 i AVS 15 4T1i 5T itroe North !From East IFroe South IFros West 3tart I 1 I i IITAVI. Tice I Right Thru Left PED51 Right Tfr'3 Lett PEW Pioht TRru Left NDSI fri0-t Thru Let CSDSi Total 19(301"s9 i I 1 i 41 @ C ca bl 87 14;17( +t 79 a 0 0. fl 8 01 0 0 6 91 a 0 @ 0 ai iljl a 80 a 0 0 11 1i @ 0 a 131 8 6 0 10) lie ia•451 0 6� fl 41 0 0 23 2! a 0 0 14i a 4 e. 5! _4'+ 4 ^tirl 290 @ 91 :l 0 5„- ! t' m 401 1 @ 0 0 141 I 411 i 1x:881 .0 75 Q 1 1! 0 t 29 1 41 i : d 59i 0 N 0 41 173 i5! @ 89 a 71 27 21. a d 0 441 0 0 t 61 13 0 45 71 ? @ e 521 0 R 0 71 194 ':1451 ,iielirl a °1 2 11 i 2 L i1! �' K 0 271 ® @ D 41 151 A 325 121 1 2 123 24) 1 1 E l" 1521 I 1114 0 211 I 6433 1 Total l l 615 l Oil i .' ii@ 2771 1 @ 0 is21 0 l f4 3� 1 11@14 Apr. i - 9fi.3 2.a 3.21 0.4 0.9 85.5 1..9. el4- f:-�.7 1 I I 15.1 2. ; i { i - - - :0:1 I ! I - -. - 3.11 I I - • 00— 188 10/05/1999 10:05 305-233-7720 XROADS ENGINEERING ..._.__.., PAGE 08 ....... CROSRRWDS EN131NEEAING DATA, INC CLIENT : CARR SMITH COMINOJACK AHLST 1355 SW 137TH AGENLE, SUITE 2K Study Naae: SMIA9ST JITK Q. : 49-135 MIAMI, FLORIDA 33185 Site Lade 1049516 • ;,RO ECT WH MIAMI BATF, CCLLEL TION TEL: 38,`,-233-399? FAX: a5 -233-7;2N Start Date: 0/04/99COIUIT'Y : MIAMI-DADE Page : 2 WjTQ,MEAVY l'EHICLE 19TH STREET Iy MIAMI AVENUE 1471+ STREET IS MIAMI AVENUE iFro= North !From East IFrsr Scu* ii'rov West Start I I 1 I IIntv�. Time _1 Right thru Left PEDSI Right jhru Left PEDSI Rioht Thiu . Left PEDSI R+ah"c TF, Lett DEG%! total Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period. 1-6:86 an 11l104/%9 .o 17:46 or.l@IQ144/99 I Tice 1 17:00 1 .7.-ftl t Il:t'16 1 11:00 ! VG1, I 8 k) 0 91 95 112 0 01 6 3S5 0 51 Pct. 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 160.0! 45.8 54.1 i4.6 X01 0.0 98.i Tota! 1 S I 267 I 390 ! EI High i 17'. N 1 17:30 117:80 1 17:08 I Total 1 4 N PKK 1 0.562 1 2.863 i b. 84: 16. we I ^'�tLJI 09•T'! -I ST1='.EG T+ ) VEI"I I CL.1.E 0I 121 () .. 0 jJ of Ill • I 1ribound 9 LIUtb0Lturd 484 t Trtal 489 11 0 �.�._ 7777.._.-._ _......r-.r..-....u�'._"^: L� ._.._� � •_., 1. I. 11l 1 1;=-, rh ,. ti3 Inbot_.rid QI T bot.trlcj ---OuL-bv1-lrld I IL l.lt0?l7o1j;id Q, Vie, h _1• a .t a 1 i i L. i tr T_i 1 _—.–._..-----•----._.. _,77_77 _._.,__.........._. }. 37 (,� t t i i d �•'� ,01 h'I 1 A M l r Y E. hI V E (,jhnt_L;d Cl �00 �'.. 0 VIS ILS QJ I 11 ti t Ig0r-t 10/05/1999 10:05 305-233-7720 XROADS ENGINEERING PAGE 07 CRMROADS ENGINEERING DATA, in CLIUrt CARR SMITH CORRi1DINWAV, AHLST 1325; S6 137TH AVEAE, >i1JITE :A7 Study Naae: SMIA95T .i4B NO. : 99-135 MIAMI, FLORIDA 333186 Site Code : 111,`057916 PROJECT : SMITH MIAMI DATA COLLECTION TEL: 365-233-3997 FAX: 305-233-7720 Start Date; I@!84>94 COJNTti' : gIAMi-DAL'E Page i AUTD,SEAVY VEHICLE ISTH STREET IS MIMI AVENJE 19TH STREET 15 MIAMI AVENUE IFroe North 1Fra East lFroe South IFroe nest Start 1 I I i flntvI. Tip I Right ihru Lek PEDSI Rieht Thru Left PEDSI Right Thru Left PEDSI Rigot Thru Left PcEDSI "total 1'/04/99 I I 1 157801 0 a 8 01 9 1: A el 0 ':: A 0i @ `0 a 01 s4 1;;:151 R 0 el 15 11 0 81 e 11 1 21 0 0 1 01 101 16;3x1 0 9 0 0i 7 12 0 01 8 77 0 01 0 0. R 61 96 1;;;451 a 0 0 01 6 12 a AI 0 94 0 81 0 .0 0 01 112 Hurl d a 01 37 47 0 01 8 315 1 1 21 r 0 a 1 01 1 tib: I 17:IbA! 0 0 9 I 41 14 27 0' 61 a 112 a 41 0 ? 0 01 161 17:151 0 a 0 21 1a 30 a ai a 92 @t 11 0 a 0 01 143 17.301 9 0 0 01 3c 28. a 81 0 a7 a 91 01 a a 01 147 17.45i 0 2 0 31 31 ?7 0 of 0 44 b QI 0 0 8 tb1 1% Z?tturl 0 6 .0 91 95 112 8 8! d 385 a 51 0 a 0 0! 666 Tntali 0 a is 9I 1:2 159 0 01 0 780 1 .71 2 8 1 61 1x89 7: Apr. 1 - - - 10.01 45.3 154.5 - -1 - 98.8 0.1 @.91 - -- % Int. I - 1 - - A.8! 1 13.a 15.7 - -1 - 64.3 I - 0.61- I 1 10/05/1999 10:05 305-233-7720 XROADS ENGINEERING PAGE 02 CROSSROADS ENGINEERING DATA, IIvC CLIENT, : CARR SMITH CCRRADIND 13.55 S4 137TH AVFAIE, {VITT 807 Study Nave: 5EtAV'E9 sIAMI, FLORIDA 331b6 Sita Cotle ; tii931e99?a CROJEC': • SOUTH MIANI AVE DATA COLLECTION TEL: 3015-233-3437 FAIT; X-2131-77,30 Start Date-,E�9i3Alg9 CC4JNi'i :MIAMI -DADS Page e AUTO, HEAVY VEHICLE ISE 151 AVE ISE 9th STREET ISE IST AUE ISE FH STREET IFrov Noris iFrov East IFrov South EFrem Uest Start 1 1 t ! IIniv1, Time I Right Thru Left PEDSI Right Toru Left fiTDSI Rion'- Thrs; Left PEDS1 Right Thru Left PEQSI Tota' Peak Hour Analysis By Entira Inters@GtiGn for the Period: 16:(10 an NSi3a194 to 17:45 ort 39f�D/95 ; Tine 1 17:00 I 111 I 1 19 W 14 36 213 l! 4 48 1' 41 i d i3 41 . Pct. ! 35.4 .37.3 6.0 21.01 [0.0 51.4 26.5 0.01 5.4 65.7 2-t.2 5.41 59.0 8.8 t+.d ill,dt Tota; 1 313 1 70 1 73 I tl t High 1 17:tom 1 i7:C�1 117:00 111.60 1 hl. 1 3� 32 A 1'.61 4 i3 7 C11 6 lb 4 c"I 1 � 0 11 Total 1 96 PHF 10.815 i 0.729 t 0.9314 1 t.ON t -"-I-IEt;'JY VI-HICLE �' 66 GG 111 1 4 36 17 1 nboijnd Zi_t1;bounci - if Total 4 SE""• IST F4 4'E �t 1111'`' 11.71ti 14 ��.. Vit'• tbli ,,�� 1.11 � y 1 it � •19 �� � .I: rtL^h_tr�c mss._; • C1 -It be'.md tar_ Total 3/J 8 t b4 1-12 -�t 14 'rib r,�.trjd 716._..----- -- ------ 0 =l.t b o .tn c..3 4� Tot dl 9.i . lnbo�.tnd 7a u!ttbot.tnd 141 ` Total 214 4 ; 1711 43•~' i 17 i 01 tai --- 1 1.7-I 48 141 SE IST LIVf=•t� SE 9T-1 STREET 00 188 10/05/1999 10:05 305-233-7720 ;:LIEfIT : CARR SMITH CORRRDIND JOB el•=.: 99-135 PROJECT: MUTH MIAMI AVE DAN COLLECTIC•i wi;L'17Y : MIANT-DADS XRO M ENGINEERING CSSROA RCF, EI6tialwc, DAtTA, INC 1Kc.5 SW 1 7TH Ail-- JE, SWIE L47 MIAMI, FLORIDA 33186 iEL. -r 33-33957 AUTO,KSWY UEHi U PAGE 01 Study NUe:'8E1AVEi Site Lode :893;?99cn Start lute: i'aAe 1 ISF IST AVE 1%.;m rwN iSE 9TH STREET ISE 15T AVE vnone: iSE 91H STREET o e: i; roe Ner±i =raa Eas} iFr3: South IFrar Leat Mart I I I 1 Tiae 1 night Thru Left RED51 Right Tnn Loft PEa51 Right Thru Left PEDSI Riah+ hr -11 pst :EDSI Total iE9; .1' 199 I I I I 1 :001 7 A 01 4 8 ESI 0;e. .3 ai 4 y Epi 51 1:•i51. 7 26 3 3i 3 4 a 01 1c 3 til 4 0 0 3! Al 16:30i 12 l7 41 4 ? 5 01 3 it 16'451 Ell 29 2 101 a 7 01 2 !c i Ni 1 0 h f a9 hourl 48 77 7 171 1: J: 22 01 6 51 9 21 0 9 51 Jet '.7:001 35 32 3 all 4 13 7 ll a ib 4 2i 1 e a 11 144 1"r:151 28 33 4 18! 4 11 5 QI 1 11 4 8! 1 0 II i21 i7.301 21 21 5 121 1 7 2, of 2 l2 2 21 1 0 0 11 �9 _ 1'1:451 " 31 . lel 5 5 6 al 1 7 0i i 6 0 1` 110 11;uur1 111 117 19 661 i4 36 20 SI 4 48 li 41 4 0 Q 41 464 To}all 159 194 26 831 27 71 ;` I NI 10 59 26 bl 11 e 0 j 91 7h5 � Apr. i 334.4 41.9 5.6 17.91 19. ur ;' t'.0 -1 ?.0 78. E ii . 4 4.21 55..0- t lrt-, I I 20.7 25.3 3.3 10.81 I i 3.5 y.2 5.4 -I I t 1.3 12.3 3.3 0.7i I 1.6- • 1%.;m rwN T From: `": vnone: ono.,.: o e: 10/05/1999 10:05 305-233-7720 XROADS ENGINEERING PAGE 09 CROSSROADS ENBINEERINu DATA, 'NC CLIENT ; CARR SMITH CORRACINO 1?,'255 S4 1437TH AVEU, MITE 297 Study Nate: SVIAVEI@ JOB MD.: 59-135 IMIANI, FLORIDA 33186 Site Code : 81309515 9'R0JK*t-; SOUTH MIAMI AVE DATA COLLECTION TEL: 305-235-3997 FAX; M-2333-7728. Start Gate: 09138x94 COUNTY MIANI-DRDE Rage AUTG, HEA'JY OENILti ISW IST AVENUE ili 10/05/1999 10:05 305-233-7720 XRCIADS ENGINEERING PAGE 10 C.SROADS ENr3iNEE4ING DATA, INC ^l.IEr!T i CARP. WITH CORRftL'I�NJ 1?�'S5 S+I 137TH AVEN'.�, SUITE x'47 Study NavQt SUTAVE10 Jus W.: 99 MIAMI, FLORIDA 331$6 Site Code : 093A991: PRWECT: SOUTH MIAMI AVE DATA CJLLECT.DN TEL: s35-23-3-399' FAX: X-233-7720 Start Date: 69: m3 CJI1tiT� 141AMI-DADE I Pago :2 AUTO,HEAVY VNCLE 13N IST AVEME ISN WTH ST IS1i 1ST AVENUE ISW 10Th ST IFron North !Frog East !Free S 4th !Fro# Best Start 1. I 1 ! Ilntvl. iiE: t Right ;nru Left PED51 RiOt Thru left I Richt Three left PEDEI Right Tht left PEDS1 Sotal PeaK your Analy;:s Ry Ertire Intersection for the Poriod: 16:80 an */U194 :a 17:45 on O/3AI99 i Tile 1 17:0 1 17:x.0 1 17s08 11709 ! 3% 71 37! 3 0 36 51 0 U 0 461 6 N N 01 PC,.. 1 0.0 :'8.6 14.0 7. s 1 rf. 0 +t. 0 65.7 14.21 6. t 6.0 0. N IW O!. 0.8 0. @' @. d 0.01 Tctal .I W 4i 1 46 ! .0 1 Si§h 117:15 11;:30 1 17:38 1 17a3'a 1 Jcl, 1 a 111 26 51 0 a 17 41 0 0 8 221 a 0 0 Oi Total 1 1462 1 2i 1 22 1 @ I PK i 8.891 1 2.5&1 10.543 10.IN i t,EFlIGLE �7 .1 .�I {96 ..7111 a� 04 4- 111 (3 t: bo,and ' -0 t6d C? 0 utaptai-cd 0 V1,A lei:-- --- --- -- ^—_ ._...-- 1 2. C, ln. bolarid .►E 03 t bo+and 434 Tote; 480 o , 4 —24 JS �1 QJ •' �d •bb SW IS], AVEVIL1E 7.1 a%1 1 0"i H .31 10/05/1999 10:05 XROADS'ENGINEERING N- PAGE- 06 — CRDSSRMS ENGINEERING DATR, INC {:LIENT z CARR SMITH UIRRADINO 13m SW 137TH AVEiBiE, SUITE 2e331 Study Nate: 5MIA185i 10B NU. : 99-135 MIAMI, FLORIDA 33mv Siti Code 2°329914 FRCZ10 : 5WIi MIAMI DATA; COLLECTION TEL: 3` -23:-399' `FAX; 395-;33-7120 Start Date: 09!33!99 COUNTY :141AMI-DADE Page :2 AUTO, HEAVY VEHICLE 116TH STREET IS MIAMI AVENUE 110TH STREET IS MIAMI AVE��E IFrot North Irrot East IFrov South IFror West Start I ! i I lintv1. Tisie 1 Pight Thru Left PEDSI Right Thrj Left..PEDSI Right Thru Left PEDSI Rioht Thru Left KDS1 Total Peak Hour Analysis .By Entire Inter+sectioa for the Period: 16:90 on 09/30/99 to !7:45 an 09/338/99 I Tiae 1 16:45 1 16:45 1 16:45 1 16:45 i Vol. I 0 0 0 171 140. 37 0 41 i2 0.6 a=a 0.0 ilV.01 7:.5 20.4 3.9 ;.21 4.3 9?.4 3.2 Lel @.8 54,1 45.8 0.01 Tat31 1 17 1 191, 1 2-18 1 24 1 Hior 117:15 1 17:98 1 1':00. 1 i6:45 I l's;. i 0 0 0 8! i7 10 6 2i 4 76 5 dl 0 5 4 01 Tota? 1 8 1 54 1 97 I 9 I F'HF 1 0.3331 1 0.767 1 &719 667. I 0 '`AUTO 1; .faVY VEHT.CLE 11 ?7 +C, 9 Inbound -- — rlut:bvund ti 13 Toted 1 nTi-1 STREET Ii 01'` u 014 14 _CA 1<1 yIII nbol_tnd 17 I Ou-bbour,d 408 l'ota1 4i''_:.5 kti 1 ri. � 4� 3 7 .;r Inbound_.._ - 46 Out boland i!{ w{ T o t s:1 2- ILI inbc-ind "T6 Out bound ><1 1'otE,1 X78 T9 �-257-t► 12 11-41TH SI -REE S S t41AMI AVENUE 2 Mort rt I 10/05/1999 10:05 305-233-7720. Xk(.IADS tNG1NELRING PAGE 05 CROSSROADS ENGNEERING DATA, Mr. C_1ENT CARR W TH IMADIND 15e.5 -914 13711H AVENUE, SMITE W study fare: SMIR103T tog N . . 94-M PIANI, FLORIDA 3=166 Site :ode : a930951a FkO;JCT SOII111 MIAMI DATA COLLECTION TEL: 3-6,15-222-2597 FAX: 305;' -7720 Start Date: 09/30/99 ruJNTY MIAMI-DADE Page 1 AUTEyHEAVY VEHICLE 110TH STREET IS Cv%Nll AVENUE 1107H STREET IS mI;mI Avawcl IFrar Horth fFroa East !Frog gutty IFrao Test ]'sz'i ! I 1 111tv1. Piga i Riaht Thru Left PCDSI Right Thru Left PEDEI Right Tn:�: Left PED I Right Tnrg Leet DEJSi ota; e5l33199 f 1 : I 15:f�1 9 8 a 9; 33 E 0 01 4 5.3 0 01 0 5 01 llc 15:151 a C 0 11 <0 9 0 41 s 64 0 1! a 1 3 21 11149 1c:321 E 0 0 1I 24 4 0 of 0 1,9 1 P; e : U. . 01 '1 5 4 8i :tom' Hauri 0 0 121 lea 24 t 4I it 02 11 0 13 9 21 335 i i I 1 51 47 10 0 e: 4 78 5 .81 .0 :: 4 di 160 1':13! 0 0 3 61 24 9 8 iti 5 75 1 81 @ 2 3 01 ?38 17:381 8 a 3 si 34 i3 a a1 0 81 a 1 0 di la: 1J:k51 0 a a is 33 3 0 01 2 43 0 11 0 4 1 df 44 Hturl N 0 4 161 134 4@ 2 41 f 11 64 8 11 l A 12 3 91 I 49? I ToEa11 0 Q 0 I 3ei 260 EA 0 61 21 44iz ld 21 @ 25 l ` ei 8115 - 00.01 78.3 19.2 - 2.41 4.3 y3.1 Z. H.41 - 56.8 38.6 4.51 - z Int, I 1 I - - - 3.31 I I 25.3 7.2 - 0.9` I 1 1 ! ; • 10/05/1999 10:05 305-233-7720 XROADS....EN,GI.N.EERING PAGE . , .. 04 7 'T i; h 1 3513 -7 4 1 53 1 9 CRIMROW ENGINURIN6 DATA, IX V-01 LARR SMITH CORRADINO i& -AZ SW 03, TH AVENUE, SUITE N7 Study Nare: SEIGE10 JOB NO. 99-135 41411, FLORIDA 11186 Site Code : 093ffi9'05 PROJECT: SOUTH MIAMI AVE DATA COLLECT!ON TEL: 305-2033-4951 FAD 3@5433-7728 Start Dote: 63130/99 COUNTY :,MIAMI-ffiDt Page 2 kffO,HEkVY VEHICLE ISE 1ST AVENUE ISE WH STREET ISE IST AKWE ISE 10th STREET IFrom North AFrom East !Eros Soqih lFroa West Start I I I IIntv.- %ge 1, Right jhru. Left P03.1 Ri,-ht Tnvu Left Th- PEDS I Right -u Left P� 95 i Rjht Thru Left REDS: Total Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 16:00 on 0/30i59 to !7:45 on 09130191 1 Tine 1 0:06 1 171@ 1 17:00 1".00 Val- 1 14 1211 18 1 16 254 14 6 1 18 43 14 51 Ie 11. 3 51 J,@ 7B.: .11.6 0.61 4.1 64.7 024.3 6.71 16.3 46.1 12.? 4,.71 39.1 K -i 4 6 16.11 Total i 154 I 86 1 110 j 31 High 1 17:15 17,30 Er 37 5 01 7 64 28 111 A 0 6 .110, .5 4 1 Total 1 44 lhb 1 38 1 12 877 1 9.724 10.646 i�l U '1' 0 SE i�3T AVI�NUE "-HE�O)Y V.0-11CILLE 1 L4 1 .2, 1 8-- 0) I ribo Lit5 4 0 1A t b c) An cl 7j�! 'T0.6al I H !!S I I 14 850 Iiibctun6 31 :j m t o o u n r • A I i i b ci!-m ci Q,xt b o j it v,, 4 7 4 I n b a imid 11 re, bo U r. Cj 7 'T i; h 1 3513 -7 4 1 53 1 9 47 13 SE 101 :•1 S'17RL-•.I--: n = =," 2S r%I c;- t h I 10/05/1999 10:05 305-233-7720 C ENT : CARR SMITH CORRADIND JOB bu.: 59-135 RROJ;. T: SOUTH 19140 AVE DATA 01,LLECTION COUNTY : MIAmi-DADS XROADS ENGINEERING Cit"uSSRMD5 ENGINEERING DATA. YX 1.V55 5N 137TH HVERIE, MITE 437 MIAMI, FLORIDA 33136 TEL: 3105-43;-3597 =AX AUTO, HEAVY YEH -1 E PAGE 03 Study plate: SEISEI@ S_te Code : 49.509-,125 Start Date @9/3@/99 Rap : 1 ISE iST, AVENUE t IrH STREET 15E `•ST i4E`CE ISE 107H STREET Ifroe North [Frog East :Free Souih lFror West Start I i I I 11n:v:. Tiee 1 Right Thra Ltft yEDSi Fight Thru Left NEDSI Right Th -u Lett FE3S1 Right Ihr Left DSI Totai 49/,3$/99 1 1 l 6: 2301 4 23 6 51 5 3 S 61 3 9 1 Ili 1 6 4 4i 127 16-151 2 2+D ' 11 3 46 15 41 8 19 2 it; 4 3 1 @I 136 16: 30 f 2 16 Y 1 11 ,' +6 c 7 11 9 13 2 1:1 0 2 N 61 122 16:451 5 2¢ 3 ;:t 0 48 19 51 5 y 4 3i 3 5 i21 134 nurl 1 13 79 28 9i I 1:4 172 48 sl 25 I 4. 9 351 le16 ; , 6I 514 17:@01 1 :4 E 01 L4 41 4 18 } l 1@1 1 i. 1 i @1 161 17:151 2 37 5 @1 4 64 1S 31 7 17 2 51 5 4 1 21 177 17:301 4 33 r 1!. 7 64 28. 111 2 S41 4 2 1 31 132 0:451 7 t7 5 !�I 2 b@ 23 91 5 y Z 61 2 4 a @1 161 (curl ( 14 12i !8 1! 16 eu 94 26) 15 I 53 14 51 1 lc 11 3 51 691 Totall 2" e0 38 101 25 422.E 142 48! 43 94 21 601 L4 27 7 111 120U x Ap.r. i 9.8 72.7 113.9 3.61 4.0 66.11 22.2 7.51 19.5 42-7 Ili 27.21 :12.8 48.2 10.4 16.4i - :t�►.. I ! 2.2 14.6 w 1 0.81 1 2.1 35.1 11.8 4.01 3.5 I I 7.5 1.9 5.0! I i 1.9 2.2 0.5 0.91 1 - 60 188 • • Site Code : Study Name: 2A13SPM M -S Street: Site Code : 00000000 E -W Street: Start Date: 06/26/97 Location. : Page :1 CARS,TRUCKS SW 2nd AVENUE ;SW 13th STREET ;SW 2nd AVENUE ;SW 13th STREET ;From North ;From East ;From South ;From West Start. ;Intvl. Time Right Thru Left Other; Right Thru left Other; Right Thru left Other; Right Thru Left Other; Total Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 16:00 on 06/26/97 to 17:45 on 06/26/97 Time 17:00 ; 17:00 ; 17:00 ; 17:00 Vol. ; 240 153 124 0; 130 976 13 0; 18 74 104 0; 4 313 60 0 Pct. ; 46.4 29.5 23.9 0.0; 11.6 87.2 1.1 0.0; 9.1 37.7 53.0 0.0; 1.0 83.0 15.9 0.0 Total ; 517 1119 ; 196 ; 311 High ; 17:15 ; 17:15 17:15 17:15 Vol. 69 52 31 0; 30 309 3 0; 7 27 23 0; 0 85 14 0 Total ; 152 342 57 99 PHF 0.850 ; 0.817 ; 0.859 0.952 240 1320 976 104 SW 2nd AVENUE 240 152 124 130 0 1 0 74 ==== ===== ===== 60 240 153 124 ===== 264 Inbound 517 Outbound 264 Total 781 60 60 0 Inbound 377 ----Outbound 1320 309 Total 1697 313 4 4 4 0 Inbound 196 Outbound 170 Total 366 4 104 73 153 0 1 13 ===== ===== -- 104 74 170 SW 2nd AVENUE 0 130 972 4 976 Inbound 1119 Outbound 455 13 Total 1574 0 13 18 313 124 SW 13th 18 0 0 0 18 0 Nor th 455 STREET 00- 188 Site Code N -S Street: E -W Street: Location : CARS,TRUCKS Study Name: 2A13SPM Site Code : 00000000 Start Date: 06/26/91 Page : 3 SW 2nd AVENUE ;SW 13th STREET ;SW 2nd AVENUE ;SW 13th STREET ;From North ;From East ;From South ;From West Start ;Intvl. Time Right Thru left Other; Right Thru left Other; Right Thru Left Other; Right Thru left Other; Total CARS TRUCKS SW 13th STREET 0 240 1320 976 104 60 60 0 Inbound outbound 309 Total 313 4 4 4 0 • SW 2nd AVENUE 240 152 124 130 0 1 0 74 ____ _____ _____ 60 240 153 124 264 Inbound 517 Outbound 264 Total 781 377 1320 1697 Inbound 196 Outbound 170 Total 366 4 104 73 153 0 1 13 =____ --- =_ 104 741 170 SW 2nd AVENUE 0 130 972 4 976 Inbound 1119 Outbound 455 13 Total 1574 0 13 18 313 455 124 SW 13th STREET 18 0 0 0 18 0 North MUM Si. 0 N -S Street: E-Wte StreetCade: : Location : CARS,TRUCKS Study Name: 2A13SPM Site Code : 00000000 Start Date: 06/26/97 Page : 1 SW 2nd AVENUE ;SW 13th STREET ;SW 2nd AVENUE ;SW 13th STREET ;From North ;From East ;From South ;From West Start ; ;Intvl. Time ; Right Thru left Other; Right Thru left Other; Right Thru left Other; Right Thru Left Other; Total 06/26/97 16:00; 51 18 19 0; 26 108 0 0; 5 18 9 0; 0 67 14 0; 329 16:15; 49 19 18 0; 24 125 1 0; 2 21 17 0; 2 58 18 0; 354 16:30; 49 21 26 0; 13 107 1 0; 2 14 9 0; 1 65 38 0; 346 16:45; 68 32 36 0; 19 164 0 0; 4 13 23 0; 1 57 21 0; 438 Hour; 217 90 99 0; 76 504 2 0; 13 66 58 0; 4 247 91 0; 1467 17:00; 58 34 30 0; 23 170 4 0; 0 10 23 0; 1 76 19 0, 448 17:15; 69 52 31 0; 30 309 3 .0; 7 27 23 0; 0 85 14 0; 650 17:30; 62 38 39 0; 36 256 2 0; 1 18 32 0; 2 74 15 0, 575 17:45; Si 29 24 0; 41 241 4 0; 10 19 26 01 1 78 12 0; 536 Hour; 140 153 124 0; 130 976 13 0; 18 74 104 0; 4 313 60 O; 2209 Total; 451. 243 223 0; 206 1480 15 0; 31 140 162 0; 8 560 151 0; 3676 % Apr. 49.5 26.3 24.1 -; 12.1 87.0 0.8 -; 9.3 42.0 48.6 -; 1.1 77.8 21.0- % Int. ; 12.4 6.6 6.0 -; 5.6 40.2 0.4 -; 0.8 3.8 4.4 -; 0.2 15.2 4.1 -; - • M� Site Code : N -S Street: E -W Street: Location : CARS,TRUCKS Study Name: 1A13SPH Site Code : 00000000 Start Date: 07/01/97 Page : 1 SW 1st AVENUE ;SW 13th STREET ;SW 1st AVENUE ;SW 13th STREET ;From North ;From East ;From South ;From West Start ;. ;Intvl. Time ; Right Thru left Other; Right Thru left Other; Right Thru left Other; Right Thru left Other; Total Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 16:00 on 07/01/97 to 17:45 on 07/01/97 Time ; 17:00 17:00 17:00 17:00 Vol. 216 97 37 0; 0 892 5 0; 11 0 32 0; 20 417 8 0 Pct. ; 61.7 27.7 10.5 0.0; 0.0 99.4 0.5 0.0; 25.5 0.0 74.4 0.0; 4.4 93.7 1.7 0.0 Total ; 350 ; 897 ; 43 ; 445 ; High 17:00 ; 17:15 17:00 17:15 Vol. 62 32 7 0; 0 279 0 O; 3 0 15 0; 2 120 1 0 Total 101 ; 279 ; 18 ; 123 PHF 0.866 ; 0.803 0.597 0.904 CARS TRUCKS SW 13th STRE 216 1140 892 32 8 8 0 SW 1st AVENUE 216 97 35 8 0 0 2 ===== _____--- ----- ----- 8 216 97 37 Inbound 350 Outbound 8 Total 358 Inbound 445 Outbound 1140 417 Total 1585 417 0 20 20 0 Inbound 43 Outbound 122 Total 165 20 321 0 97 0 0 5 __--- 32 122 SW 1st AVENUE 0 Inbound 897 Outbound 465 Total 1362 0 0 892 0 892 5 0 5 11 417 465 37 SW 13th STREET 11 0 0 0 11 0 North 0— 188 CARS TRUCKS SW 13t 1776 8 354 1363 59 d SW 1st AVENUE 354 153 72 8 0 0 2 354 153 74 Inbound 581 Outbound 8 Total 589 Inbound 821 Outbound 1776 775 Total 2597 775 0 38 38 0 • Inbound 74 Outbound 201 Total 275 38 59 0 153 0 OI 10 ===== ===== 59 0' 201 SW 1st AVENUE 0 0 1363 0 1363 Inbound 1373 Outbound 864 10 Total 2237 0 10 15 775 864 74 SW 13th STREET 15 0 0 0 15 O Site Code Study Name: 1A13SPM N -S Street: Site Code : 00000000 E -W Street: Start Date: 07/01/97 Location : Page : 2 CARS,TRUCKS ;SW 1st AVENUE ;SW 13th STREET ;SW 1st AVENUE ;SW 13th STREET ;From North ;.From East ;From South ;From West Start ;Intvl. Time Right Thru Left Other; Right Thru Left Other; Right Thru left Other; Right Thru Left Other; Total CARS TRUCKS SW 13t 1776 8 354 1363 59 d SW 1st AVENUE 354 153 72 8 0 0 2 354 153 74 Inbound 581 Outbound 8 Total 589 Inbound 821 Outbound 1776 775 Total 2597 775 0 38 38 0 • Inbound 74 Outbound 201 Total 275 38 59 0 153 0 OI 10 ===== ===== 59 0' 201 SW 1st AVENUE 0 0 1363 0 1363 Inbound 1373 Outbound 864 10 Total 2237 0 10 15 775 864 74 SW 13th STREET 15 0 0 0 15 O North Site Code : N -S Street: E -W Street: Location : CARS,TRUCKS Study Name:.1A13SPM Site Code : 00000000 Start Date: 07/01/97 Paye : 1 ;SW 1st AVENUE ;SW 13th STREET ;SW 1st AVENUE ;SW 13th STREET ;From North ;From East ;From South ;From West Start ; ; ; ;Intel. Time Right Thru left Other; Right Thru Left Other; Right Thru left Other' Right Thru Left Other; Total 07/01/97 16:00; 24 13 11 0; 0 118 2 0; 1 0 5 0; 6 73 0 0; 253 16:15; 30 17 13 0; 0 90 2 0, 0 0 0 0; 4 91 0 0; 247 16:30; 40 16 8 0; 0 139 1 0; 2 0 13 0; 5 95 0 0; 319 16:45; 44 10 S 0; 0 124 0 0, 1 0 9 0, 3 99 0 4; 295 Hour; 138 56 37 0; 0 471 5 0, 4 0 27 0, 18 358 0 0; 1114 17:00, 62 32 7 0; 0 260 1 0, 3 0 15 0; 6 91 0 0; 477 17:15; 59 18 14 0;. 0 279 0 0; 4 0 3 0; 2 120 1 0; 510 17:30, 46 18 6 0; 0 173 2 0; 1 0 10 0; 5 110 4 0; 375 17:45, 49 19 10 0: 0 180 2 0; 3 0 4 0: 7 96 3 0; 373 Hour; 216 97 37 0; 0 892 5 0; 11 0 32 0; 20 417 8 0; 1735 Total; 354 153 74 0; 0 .1363 10 0; 15 0 59 0, 38 775 8 .0, 2849 k Apr. ; 60.9 26.3 12.7 -; - 99.2 0.7 -; 20.2 - 79.7 -; 4.6 94.3 0.9- t Int. 12.4 5.3 2.5 -; - 47.8 0.3 -; 0.5 - 2.0 -; 1.3 27.2 0.2 -; - t is O0- 188 • ;7 Site Code N -S. Street: E -W Street: Location : Vehicle group 1,Vehicle group 2 Study Name: MAI3SPM Site Code : 00000000 Start Date: 07/01/97 Page : 3 ;MIAMI AVENUE ;SW 13th STREET . ;MIAMI AVENUE ;SW 13th STREET ;Southbound ;Westbound ;Northbound ;Eastbound Start. ;Intvl. Time Right Thru Left Other; Right Thru left Other; Right Thru Left Other; Right Thru Left Other; Total Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 16:00 on 07/01/97 to 17:45 on 07/01/97 Time -; 17:00 ; 17:00 ; 17:00 ; 17:00 Vol. 123 123 11 O; 78 793 36 0; 32 92 67 O; 40 353 65 0 Pct. 47.8 47.8 4.2 0.0; 8.5 87.4 3.9 0.0; 16.7 48.1 35.0 0.0; 8.7 77.0 14.1 0.0 Total .257 907 ; 191 ; 458 ; High 17:00 ; 17:15 ; 17:45 ; 17:45 Vol. ; 35 44 5 0; 20 253 4 0; 9 25. 17 0; 13 97 20 0 Total ; 84 ; 277 ; 51 130 PHF 0.764 ; 0.818 ; 0.936 ; 0.880 Vehicle group 1 Vehicle group 2 SW 13th STRE 123 983 793 67 MIAMI AVENUE 123 123 11 78 0 0 0 92 ==== ===== ===== 65 123 123 11 235 Inbound 257 Outbound 235 Total 492 65 65 0 Inbound 458 -Outbound 983 352 Total 1441 353 1 40 40 0 Inbound 191 Outbound 199 Total 390 40 67 90 123 0 2 36 ===== ===== 67 92 199 MIAMI AVENUE 0 78 792 1 793 Inbound 907 . Outbound 396 36 Total 1303 0 36 32 353 396 it SW 13th STREET 32 0 0 0 32 0 North OQ- 188 Site Code N -S Street: E W Street: Location : Vehicle group 1,Vehicle group 2 0 Study Name: MAI3SPM Site Code : 00000000 Start Date: 01/01/91 Page : 2 ;MIAMI AVENUE ;SW 13th STREET ;MIAMI AVENUE ;SW 13th STREET ;Southbound ;Westbound ;Northbound ;Eastbound Start ;Intvl. Time Right Thru Left Other; Right Thru Left Other, Right Thru Left Other; Right Thru Left Other; Total Vehicle group 1 Vehicle group 2 SW 13th STREET 171 1459 1166 122 134 134 0 MIAMI AVENUE 171 194 26 136 0 1 0 188 ==== ===== ===== 134 171 195 26 ===== 458 Inbound 392 Outbound 458 Total 850 Inbound 872 0 Outbound 1459 649 Total 2331 650 1 88 88 0 • Inbound 373 Outbound 338 Total 711 88 122 185 195 0 3 55 ===== 122 '188 338 MIAMI AVENUE Inbound 1357 Outbound 739 Total 2096 0 136 1165 1 1166 55 0 55 63 650 739 26 SW 13th STREET 63 0 0 0 63 0 ; North C • Site Code : N -S Street: E -W Street: Location : CARS,TRUCKS Study Name: MAI3SPM Site Code : 00000000 Start Date: 01/01/97 Page : 1 ;.MIAMI AVENUE ;SW 13th STREET ;MIAMI AVENUE ;SW 13th STREET ;Southbound ;Westbound ;Northbound ;Eastbound Start ;Intvl. Time Right Thru Left Other; Right Thru Left Other' Right Thru Left Other; Right Thru Left Other' Total 07/01/97 ' 16:00; 15 17 5 0; .11 79 3 0; 8 22 21 0; 15 63 14 0; 273 16:15; 11 14 2 0; 13 73 7 0; 8 15 10 0; 9 68 21 0; 251 16:30; 11 19 4 0; 13 124 3 0; 9 25 10 C 13 77 14 0; 322 16:45; 11 22 4 0; 21 97 6 0; 6 34 14 0; 11 89 20 0� 335 Hour; 48 72 15 0; 58 373 19 0; 31 96 55 0; 48 297 69 0; 1181 17:00; 35 44 5 0; 26 183 11 0; 6 26 18 0; 6 71 14 0; 44S 17:15; 36 31 2 0; 20 253 4 O; 10 17 16 0; 15 92 14 0; 510 17:30; 30 27 2 0; 17 181 9 0; 7 24 16 0; 6 93 17 0; 429 11:45; 22 21 2 0; 15 176 12 0; 9 25 17 01 13 97 20 0� 429 Hour; 123 123 11 0; 78 793 36 0; 32 92 67 0; 40 353 65 0; 1813 Total; 171 195 26 0; 136 1166 55 0; 63 188 122 0; 88 650 134 0; 2994 2 Apr. 43.6 49.7 6.6 -; 10.0 85.9 4.0 -; 16.8 50.4 32.7 -; 10.0 74.5 15.3- % Int. 5.7 6.5 0.8 -; 4.5 38.9 1.8 -; 2.1 6.2 4.0 -; 2.9 21.7 4.4 -; - • • 0 Site Code : N-5 Street: E -W Street: Location : CARS,TRUCKS • Study Nave: BAI3SPM Site Code : 00000000 Start Date: 06/26/97 Page : 1 ;BRICKELL AVENUE ;SW 13th STREET ;BRICKELL AVENUE ;SW 13th STREET ;From North ;From East ;From South ;From West Start f;Intvl. Time Right Thru left Other; Right Thru Left Other; Right Thru Left Other; Right Thru Left Other; Total Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 16:00 on 06/26/97 to 17:45 on 06/26/97 Time 17:00 17:00 17:00 ; 17:00 Vol. 541 930 35 0; 57 239 111 0; 24 477 116 0; 97 69 173 0 Pct. 35.9 61.7 2.3 0.0; 14.0 58.7 27.2 0.0; 3.8 11.3 18.8 0.0; 28.6 20.3 51.0 0.0 Total 1506 ; 407 617 339 ; High 17:45 ; 17:15 ; 17:15 17:15 Vol. ; 166 252 7 0; 15 79 22 0; 9 124 29 0; 26 17 49 0 Total 425 116 162 92 PHF 0.885 ; 0.877 0.952 0.921 CARS TRUCKS SW 13th STREET 541 .896 239 116 171 173 2 Inbound utbound 68 Total 69 1 97 97 0 BRICKELL AVENUE 536 924 35 57 5 6 0 477 ==== ===== ===== 173 541 930 35 707 Inbound 1506 Outbound 707 Total 2213 339 896 1235 Inbound 617 Outbound 1138 Total 1755 97 116 930 0 469 8 116 477 1138 BRICKELL AVENUE 1 57 239 0 239 Inbound 407 Outbound 128 111 Total 535 0 111 24 69 128 35 SW 13th STREET 24 0 0 0 24 0 North 0®- 188 Site Code : 0 0 0 Study Name: BAI3SPM N -,S Street: 226 169 Site Code : 00000000 E -W Street: 169 Start Date: 06/26/97 Location : 115 Page : 2 62 CARS,TRUCKS 13th STREET ;BRICKELL AVENUE ;SW 13th STREET ;BRICKELL AVENUE ;SW 13th STREET ;From North. ;From East ;From South ;From West Start ;Intvl. Time Right Thru Left Other; Right Thru _ Left_ Other; Right Thru Left Other; Right Thru Left Other; Total CARS BRICKELL AVENUE TRUCKS 1 831 1519 62 93 13 13 0 859 324 1 844 1532 62 1276 Inbound 2439 Outbound 1276 SW 13th STREET Total 3715 91 844 1355 316 195 318 324 6 Inbound 623 Outbound 1355 114 Total 1978 115 1 184 184 0 • Inbound 1103 Outbound 1885 Total 2988 184 195 844 1532 O 15 169 ===== ===== 195 859 1885 BRICKELL AVENUE Inbound Outbound Total 49 0 0 0 49 0 I 2 93 316 North 0 316 578 226 169 804 0 169 49 115 226 62 SW 13th STREET North • 00- 188 i • Site Code : Study Name: BAI3SPM N-5 Street: Site Code : 00000000 E-W.Street: Start Date: 06/26/97 Location Page I CARS,TRUCKS BRICKELL AVENUE ;SW 13th STREET ;BRICKELL AVENUE ;SW 13th STREET ;From North ;From East ;From South ;From West Start ; ; ;Intel. Time ; Right Thru left Other; Right Thru left Other; Right Thru left Other; Right Thru left Other; Total 06/26/91 16:00; 83 119 8 0.; 10 17 .9 0; 7 Ill 21 0; 24 12 39 0; 460 16:15; 85 160 6 0; 8 20 18 0; 4 99 20 0; 23 7 32 .0; 482 16:30; 70 144 5 1; 14 17 10 0; 4 76 20 O; 21 14 41 0; 437 16:45; 65 179 8 0 4 23 21 0; 10 96 18 0; 19 13 39 0; 495 Hour; 303 602 27 1; 36 77 58 0; 25 382 79 0+ 87 .46 151 0; 1874 17:00; 87 176 13 0; 9 42 33 0; 4 111 23 0; 26 23 37 0; 584 17:15; 149 244 10 0; 15 79 22 0; 9 124 29 0; 26 17 49 0; 773 17:30; 139 258 5 0; 16 53 25 0; 4 122. 36 0; 24 16 42 0; 740 17:45; 166 252 7 01 17 65 31 0; 7 120 28 0; 21 13 45 0; 772 Hour; 541 930 35 0; 57 239 111 0; 24 477 116 0; 97 69 173 0; 2869 Total; 844 1532 62 1; 93 316 169 0; 49 859. 195 0; 184 115 324 0; 4743 2 APT. 34.6 62.8 2.5 -; 16.0 54.6 29.2 -; 4.4 11.8 17.6 -; 24.5 18.4 52.0- z Int. 17.7 32.3 1.3 -; 1.9 6.6 3.5 -; 1.0 18.1 4.1 -; 3.8 2.4 6.8 -; - • 00- 188 • • • APPENDIX B Calculation of Traffic Growth Rate 00- 188 G:\2573\excel\growth.xls 00- 188 10/26/1999 p Brickell Area Estimated h Growt Rates for Mainreet Stud y 1. SE 13th St. W of U.S. 1 4. SW 8th St. W of U.S. 1 FDOT Station: 870086 FDOT Station: 875090 Annual Growth Rate: 0.050 Annual Growth Rate: 0.030 Year AADT Delta Year AADT Delta 1988 10,205 1991 10,456 1989 10,470 265 1992 10,500 44 1990 10,480 10 1993 14,000 3,500 1991 11,482 1,002 1994 13,500 (500) 1993 10,100 (1,382) 1995 15,000 1,500 1994 10,800 700 1996 11,000 (4,000) 1995 8,200 (2,600) 1997 11,000 - 1996 10,300 2,100 1998 13,000 2,000 1997 11,700 1,400 1998 15,100 3,400 Average 12,307 363 Average 10,884 544 5. SW 7th St. W of U.S. 1 FDOT Station: 875091 2. U.S. 1 S of SE 13th St. Annual Growth Rate: 0.009 FDOT Station: 875041 Annual Growth Rate: 0.005 Year AADT Delta 1991 8,265 Year AADT Delta 1992 7,900 (365) 1988 24,025 1993 12,500 4,600 1989 25,291 1,266 1994 13,500 1,000 1990 27,345 2,054 1995 12,000 (1,500) 1991 25,820 (1,525) 1996 9,100 (2,900) 1992 23,500 (2,320) 1997 8,500 (600) 1993 25,500 2,000 1998 8,900 400 1996 23,000 (2,500) 1997 23,000 - Average 10,083 91 1998 25,000 2,000 Average 24,720 122 9. Study Area Average Annual Growth Rate: 0.017 3. U.S. 1 S of SE 8th St. FDOT Station: 875042 AADT Delta Annual Growth Rate: 0.013 Averages 17,814 301 Year AADT Delta 1988 29,424 1989 30,934 1,510 1990 29,253 (1,681) 1991 32,280 3,027 1992 30,500 (1,780) 1993 33,000 2,500 1996 28,000 (5,000) 1997 27,500 (500) 1998 32,500 5,000 Average 30,377 385 G:\2573\excel\growth.xls 00- 188 10/26/1999 0 • APPENDIX C 11 0 Existing (1999) Level of Service Calculations 0 • • 0„ • Brickell Mainstreet MUSP 10/26/99 Existing (1999) PM Peak 08:27:12 Existing Cycle Length and Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.001 - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # 1 - SW 7 St. & SW 2 Ave. METROAREA NONCBD ALL PERMISSIVES NO SIMULATION PERIOD 15 YES YES CYCLES LEVELOFSERVICE C S GREENTIMES 32.00 40.00 NODELOCATION 0 0 4.00 CRITICALS 0 Approach Parameters EXCESS 0 APPLABELS SB WB NB EB GRADES 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 PEDLEVELS MODER MODER MODER MODER PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 20 20 20 20 BUSVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 0 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS RT TH LT 168 494 0 0.0 24.0 0.0 0 2 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.88 0.88 0.88 3 3 3 NO NO NO 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00.1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3319 0 Phasing Parameters SEQUENCES 11 ALL PERMISSIVES NO NO OVERLAPS YES YES CYCLES 80 80 GREENTIMES 32.00 40.00 YELLOWTIMES 4.00 4.00 CRITICALS 0 0 EXCESS 0 RT TH LT 106 1118 122 0.0 36.0 0.0 0 3 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.80 0.80 0.80 3 3 3 NO NO NO 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 4877 0 NO NO YES YES 10 RT TH LT 0 342 193 0.0 24.0 0.0 0 2 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.94 0.94 0.94 3 3 3 NO NO NO 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 2017 0 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME RT TH LT 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.90 0.90 0.90 3 3 3 NO NO NO 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 0 0 NONE NONE 0.00 1 0.0 0 • Brickell Mainstreet MUSP Existing (1999) PM Peak Existing Cycle Length and Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.001 - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 1 - SW 7 St. & SW 2 Ave. Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.66 Vehicle Delay 19.3 Sq 11 /i\ I' North ------------------------- Phase 1 1 Phase 2 1 ------------------------- + + + + ++++I <+ + <++++ V, ++++ I v + + + + ----------------------- G/C=0.400 G/C=0.500 l G= 32.0" l G= 41 Y+R= 4.0" Y+R= 4.0" OFF= 0.0% OFF=45.0% f C= 80 sec G= 72.0 sec = 90.0% 10/26/99 08:27:23 Level of Service B Y= 8.0 sec = 10.0% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Lane Width/ g/C Service Rate Adj HCM L Group l Lanesl Reqd Used I @C (vph) @H lVolumel v/c I Delay I S 190%'Max Queue I ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SB Approach 20.4 C+ I TH+RTJ 24/2 10.277 10.400 1 1228 1 1328 1 752 10.566 1 20.4 1 C+1 254 ftj ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NB Approach 25.2 C+ ILT+TH 1 24/2 10.342 10.400 1 708 1 807 1 569 10.705 1 25.2 1 C+1 192 ftj --------.----------------------------------------------------------------------- WB Approach 16.9 B ILT+TH+RTI 36/3 10.368 0.500 1 2405 1 2438 1 1681 10.689 1 16.9 1 B 1 315 ftj ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 00- 188 • • 0 Brickell Mainstreet MUSP Existing (1999) PM Peak Existing Cycle Length and Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.001 - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # 2 - SW 7 St. & SW 1 Ave. METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters 10/26/99 08:28:42 APPLABELS SB WB NB EB GRADES 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 PEDLEVELS MODER MODER MODER MODER PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 20 20 20 20 BUSVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 0 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS RT TH LT 264 325 0 12.0 24.0 0.0 1 2 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.91 0.91 0.91 3 3 3 NO NO NO 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 DOPT NORM NORM 1406 3354 0 Phasing Parameters SEQUENCES 11 ALL PERMISSIVES NO NO OVERLAPS YES YES CYCLES 80 80 GREENTIMES 36.00 33.00 YELLOWTIMES 5.00 6.00 CRITICALS 1 1 EXCESS 0 3 RT TH LT 0 1146 99 0.0 36.0 0.0 0 3 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 .2.0 0.79 0.79 0.79 3 3 3 NO NO NO 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 4986 0 NO NO YES YES 10 RT TH LT 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 .2.0 0.90 0.90.0.90 3 3 3 NO NO NO 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 0 0 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME RT TH LT 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.90 0.90 0.90 3 3 3 NO NO NO 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 .5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 '1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 0 0 NONE NONE 0.00 1 0.0 0 E. 0 Brickell Mainstreet MUSP 10/26/99 Existing (1999) PM Peak 08:28:52 Existing Cycle Length and Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPACIVer 1.001 - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 2 - SW 7 St. & SW 1 Ave. Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.63 Vehicle Delay 20.6 Level of Service C+ Sq 11 North ------------------------- Phase 1 1 Phase 2 ------------------------- * + * + v ++++ I v I ------------------------- G/C=0.450 G/C=0.412 G= 36.0" G= 33.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 6.0" OFF= 0.0% OFF=51.3% ------------------------- C= 80 sec G= 69.0 sec = 86.3% Y=11.0 sec = 13.8% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% Lane---IWidth/I-----g/C-------Service Rate---Adj-----------HCM -- I L -- Group Lanes Reqd Used I @C (vph) @H lVolumel v/c I Delay S 190%Max Queue 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SB Approach 14.7 B+ RT 12/1+10.232 1 --------------------------------------------------------- 10-450 1 551 1 633 1 193 0.30515.3 B 119 ft TH 24/2-10.200 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0.450 1433 1 1509 454 10.301 I 14.5 1*B+I 140 ftl WB Approach 23.0 C+ ILT+TH 36/3 10.343 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10.412 1 1971 1 2057 1 1576 10.766 1 --------------- 23.0 1 C+1 347 ftj 0®— ivs • • 0 Brickell Mainstreet MUSP Existing (1999) PM Peak Existing Cycle Length and Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.001 - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # 3 - S 7 St. & S. Miami Ave. METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters 10%26/99 08:30:49 APPLABELS SB WB NB EB GRADES 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 PEDLEVELS MODER MODER MODER MODER PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 20 20 20 20 BUSVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 0 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS RT TH LT 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.90 0.90 0.90 3 3 3 NO NO NO 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 0 0 Phasing Parameters SEQUENCES 11 ALL PERMISSIVES NO NO OVERLAPS YES YES CYCLES 100 100 GREENTIMES 35.00 36.00 YELLOWTIMES 4.00 5.00 CRITICALS 0 0 EXCESS 0 3 RT TH LT 38 795 0 12.0 24.0 0.0 1 2 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.81 0.81 0.81 3 3 3 NO NO NO 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 1406 3539 0 NO NO YES YES 10 RT TH LT 0 464 397 0.0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.92 0.92 0.92 3 3 3 NO NO NO 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM DOPT 0 3360 1406 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME RT TH LT 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.90 0.90 0.90 3 3 3 NO NO NO 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 0 0 NONE NONE 0.00 1 0.0 0 MOM • • • Brickell Mainstreet MUSP 10/26/99 Existing (1999) PM Peak 10:32:48 Existing Cycle Length and Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.001 - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # 4 - SE 7 St. & Brickell Ave. METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS GRADES PEDLEVELS PARKINGSIDES PARKVOLUMES BUSVOLUMES RIGHTTURNONREDS SB WB NB EB 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 MODER MODER MODER MODER NONE NONE NONE NONE 20 20 20 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS RT TH LT 221 1131 11 12.0 24.0 12.0 1 2 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.88 0.88 0.88 3 3 3 NO NO YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 1406 3539 1770 Phasing Parameters RT TH LT 115 317 105 0.0 24.0 0.0 0 2 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.68 0.68 0.68 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3193 0 SEQUENCES 61 ALL PERMISSIVES YES NO NO NO OVERLAPS YES YES YES YES CYCLES 100 100 10 GREENTIMES 6.00 24.00 49.00 20.00 YELLOWTIMES 3.00 3.00 5.00 5.00 CRITICALS 0 0 0 0 EXCESS 0 RT TH LT 10 1067 490 0.0 36.0 24.0 0 3 2 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.84 0.84 0.84 3 3 3 NO NO YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 5074 3433 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME RT TH LT 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.90 0.90 0.90 -3 3 3 NO NO NO 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 0 0 NONE NONE 0.00 1 0.0 0 Brickell Mainstreet MUSP 10/26/99 Existing (1999) PM Peak 10:33:00 Existing Cycle Length and Phasing SIGNAZ,97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.001 - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 4 - SE 7 St. & Brickell Ave. Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.75 Vehicle Delay 66.9 Level of Service E+ ------------------------------------------------- Sq 61 Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 **/** ------------------------------------------------- + I + + + A + + + + ++++ / +> <+ + +><++++ V ++++ A A v North <+ <+ + +> + +> + + + + + + + + + + + + ------------------------------------------------- G/C=0.052 G/C=0.209 G/C=0.426 G/C=0.174 G= 6.0" G= 24.0" G= 49.0" G= 20.0" Y+R= 3.0" Y+R= 3.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" OFF= 0.0% OFF= 7.8% OFF=31.3% OFF=78.3% ------------------------------------------------- C=115 sec G= 99.0 sec = 86.1% Y=16.0 sec = 13.9% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Lane (Width/I g/C I --- Service Ratel Adj I I HCM L 190% Max--Group---Lanes--Reqd---Used@C-(vph)-@E--Volume---v/c---Delay---S---Queue-- SB Approach 34.1 C ----------------------------------------------------------------- RT 12/1 0.337 0.426 436 599 I 251 0.419 25.2 C+ 233 ft TH 24/2 0.431 0.426 1259 1508 1285 0.852 36.0 D+ 596 ft LT 112/1 0.000 0.052 I 212 261 13 0.050 14.8 B+ 25 ft ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NB Approach 17.6 B ----LT+RTI 353 353 12826/3 234 I 24/2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 583 10.382 '0.297 0.287 13521 13985 0.592 I 36.2 I D+I 336 ft WB Approach 247.6 F ILT+TH+RTI 24/2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10.345 10.174 1 1 1 544 1 789 11.422 1 247.6 1 F 1 527 ft+ 00- 188 • • • Brickell Mainstreet MUSP 10/26/99 Existing (1999) PM Peak 10:34:23 Existing Cycle Length and Optimized Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.001 - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters.for Int # 4 - SE 7 St. & Brickell Ave. METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS SB WB NB, EB GRADES 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 PEDLEVELS MODER MODER MODER MODER PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 20 20 20 20 BUSVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 .0 0 0 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS .GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS RT TH LT 221 1131 11 12.0 24.0 12.0 1 2 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.88 0.88 0.88 3 3 3 NO NO YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 1406 3539 1770 Phasing Parameters RT TH LT 115 317 105 0.0 24.0 0.0 0 2 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.V 2.0 0.68 0.68 0.68 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3193 0 RT TH LT 10 1067 490 0.0 36.0 24.0 0 3 2 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.84 0.84 0.84 3 3 3 NO NO YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 5074 3433 RT TH IT 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.90 0.90 0.90 3 3 3 NO NO NO 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 .5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1:00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 0 0 SEQUENCES 61 ALL PERMISSIVES YES NO NO NO LEADLAGS NONE NONE OVERLAPS YES YES YES YES OFFSET 0.00 1 CYCLES 100 100 10 PEDTIME 0.0 0 GREENTIMES 6.00 22.00 42.00 29.00 YELLOWTIMES 3.00 3.00 5.00 5.00 CRITICALS 0 0 0 0 EXCESS 0 1 '�' s. 6 4 • Brickell Mainstreet MUSP 10/26/99 Existing (1999) PM Peak 10:34:34 Existing Cycle Length and Optimized Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.001 - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 4 - SE 7 St. & Brickell Ave. Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.74 Vehicle Delay 42.9 Level of Service D+ ------------------------------------------------- S q 61 1 Phase 1 1 Phase 2 1 Phase 3 1 Phase 4 1 **/** ------------------------------------------------- + + + + + + + + ++++ +> <+ + +> <++++ v ++++ 1 11 v North <+ <+ + +> + +>I + + + + + + + + + + + + ------------------------------------------------- G/C=0.052 G/C=0.191 G/ C=0.365 G/C=0.252 G= 6.0" G= 22.0" G= 42.0" G= 29.0" Y+R= 3.0" Y+R= 3.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" OFF= 0.0% OFF= 7.8% OFF=29.6% OFF=70.4% ------------------------------------------------- C=115 sec G= 99.0 sec = 86.1% Y=16.0 sec = 13.9% Ped= 0.0 sec = '0.0% -----------=------------------------------------------------------------------- Lane (Width/1 g/C I Service Rate ivolumel Adj I HCM I L 190% MaxGroup Lanes Regd Used @C (vph) @E v/c Delay S Queue ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SB Approach 55.0 E+ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- RT 12/1 0.337 0.365 311 513 251 0.489 31.5 C 258 ft TH 24/2 0.431 0.365935 1293 1285 10.994 1 60.0 E+ 659 ft LT -=----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 12/1 0.000 0.052 1 183 235 1 13 0.055 18.6 B 25 ft NB Approach 21.5 C+ ----LT+RT 24/2 0.2702396 1 2956 1 1282 10.434 1 38.3 1 D+1 344 ft1 1 10.297 10.583 113.9 288 ---------------------------------------------------------=--------------------- WB Approach 69.5 E ILT+TH+RTI 24/2 10.345 10.252 1 242 1 805 1 789 10.980 1 69.5 1 E 1 477 ftj ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- • • • Brickell Mainstreet MUSP Existing (1999) PM Peak Existing Cycle Length and Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.001 - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # 5 - SW 8 St. & SW 2 Ave. METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters 10/26/99 08:32:04 APPLABELS SB WB NB EB GRADES 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 PEDLEVELS MODER MODER MODER MODER PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 20 20 20 20 BUSVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 0 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS RT TH LT 0 504 121 0.0 24.0 0.0 0 2 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.88 0.88 0.88 3 3 3 NO NO NO 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3239 0 Phasing Parameters RT TH LT 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.90 0.90 0.90 3 3 3 NO NO NO 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 0 0 SEQUENCES 21 ALL PERMISSIVES YES NO NO OVERLAPS YES YES YES CYCLES 60 60 10 GREENTIMES 5.00 32.00 32.00 YELLOWTIMES 3.00 4.00 4.00 CRITICALS 0 0 0 EXCESS 0 NO YES RT TH LT 20 412 0 0.0 24.0 0.0 0 2 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.91 0.91 0.91 3 3 3 NO NO NO 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3499 0 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME RT TH LT 114 683 120 0.0 36.0 0.0 0 3 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.96 0.96 0.96 3 3 3 NO NO NO 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 4772 0 NONE NONE 0.00 1 0.0 0 00- 188 • Brickell Mainstreet MUSP Existing (1999) PM Peak Existing Cycle Length and Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.001 - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 5 - SW 8 St. & SW 2 Ave. Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.44 Vehicle Delay 16.8 ------------------------------------- Sq 21.1 Phase 1 1 Phase 2 1 Phase 3 1 **/** ------------------------------------- + + ' + + ++ ++ i II v v North I + +> ++++> + + ++++ + + v ------------------------------------- G/C=0.063 I G/C=0.400 I G/C=0.400 G= 5.0" I G= 32.0" G= 32.0" Y+R= 3.0" Y+R= 4.0" Y+R= 4.0" OFF= 0.0% OFF=10.0% OFF=55.0% ------------------------------------- C= 80 sec G= 69.0 sec = 86.3% Y=11.0 sec = 13.8% 10/2.6/99 08:32:13 Level of Service B Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% Width/ g/C - --------------------------------------------------- Lane L Group ' Lanes' Reqd Used I @C (vph) CSE Ivolumel v/c I DelService Rate Adj HCM ay I S 190%.Max, Quue , ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SB Approach 13.7 B+ ILT+TH 1 24/2 10.272 0.500 + 1566 1 1620 711 10.439 1 13.7 1 B+1 200 ftj ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NB Approach 17.3 B TH+RTI 24/2 0.199 10.400 1 1300 1 1400 475 10.339 1 17.3 1 B 1 160 ftj --- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- EB Approach 18.9 B ------------------------ ILT+TH+RTI 36/3 10.244 10.400 1 1814 1 1909 955 0.500 1 18.9 1 B 1 215 ftj ------.------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0®- 188 • • • Brickell Mainstreet MUSP 10/26/99 Existing (1999) PM Peak 08:32:44 Existing Cycle Length and Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.001 - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # 6 - SW 8 St. & SW 1 Ave. METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS SB WB NB EB GRADES 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 PEDLEVELS MODER MODER MODER MODER PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 20 20 20 20 BUSVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 0 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS RT TH LT 0 273 115 0.0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.92 0.92 0.92 3 3 3 NO NO NO 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3539 1406 Phasing Parameters SEQUENCES 11 ALL PERMISSIVES NO NO OVERLAPS YES YES CYCLES 100 100 GREENTIMES 38.00 34.00 YELLOWTIMES 4.00 4.00 CRITICALS 0 0 EXCESS 0 RT TH LT 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.90 0.90 0.90 3 3 3 NO NO NO 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 0 0 NO NO YES YES 10 RT TH LT 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.90 0.90 0.90 3 3 3 NO NO' NO 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1:00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 0 0 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME RT TH LT 109 790 0 0.0 36.0 0.0 0 3 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.97 0.97 0.97 3 3 3 NO NO NO 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 4934 0 NONE NONE 0.00 1 0.0 0 00- ISS • Brickell Mainstreet MUSP 10/26/99 Existing (1999) PM Peak 08:32:54 Existing Cycle Length and Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.001 - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages 'for Int # 6 - SW 8 St. & SW 1 Ave. Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.36 Vehicle Delay 15.5 Level of Service B ------------------------- Sq 11 1 Phase 1 1 Phase 2 **/** ------------------------- /I\ + +> V, i North ++++> v ------------------------- G/C=0.475 G/C=0.425 1 G= 38.0" G= 34.0" IY+R= 4.0" Y+R= 4.0" OFF= 0.0% OFF=52.5% C= 80 sec G= 72.0 sec = 90.0% Y= 8.0 sec = 10.0% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% LaneWidth/ g/C Service Rate Adj HCM L Group I Lanes Reqd Used I @C (vph) @E lVolumel v/c I Delay I S 190%Maxl Queue ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SB Approach 12.4 B+ ---TH -1 24/2 10.155 10.475 1 1618 1 1681 297 B+188 ft LT 12/1 0.187 0.475 592 668 125 10.177 0.187 I 12.7 I B+j 74 ftl ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- EB Approach 17.0 B TH+RTI. 36/3 10.233 10.425 1 2019 1 2097 926 10.442 1 17.0 I B 1 200 ftj ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10 188 • Brickell Mainstreet MUSP 10/26/99' Existing (1999) PM Peak 10:40:15 Existing Cycle Length and Phasing. SIGNAL97/TEAPACIVer 1.001 - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS GRADES PEDLEVELS PARKINGSIDES PARKVOLUMES BUSVOLUMES RIGHTTURNONREDS 7 - S 8 St. & S Miami Ave. SB WB NB EB 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 MODER MODER MODER MODER NONE NONE NONE NONE 20 20 20 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS RT TH LT 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0. 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.90 0.90 0.90 3 3 3 NO NO NO 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 0 0 Phasing Parameters SEQUENCES 11 ALL PERMISSIVES NO NO OVERLAPS YES YES CYCLES 100 100 GREENTIMES 44.00 28.00 YELLOWTIMES 4.00 4.00 CRITICALS 0 0 EXCESS 0 RT TH LT 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0.00.0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.90 0.90 0.90 3 3 3 NO NO NO 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 0 0 NO NO YES YES 10 RT TH LT 44 596 0 0.0 24.0 0.0 0 2 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.91 0.91 0.90 3 3 3 NO NO NO 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3480 0 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME RT TH LT 0 702 216 0.0 36.0 0.0 0 3 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.90 0.93 0.93 3 3 3 NO NO NO 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 4792 0 NONE NONE 0.00 1 0.0 0 Brickell Mainstreet MUSP 10/26/99 Existing (1999) PM Peak 10:40:25 Existing Cycle Length and Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.001 - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 7 - S 8 St. & S Miami Ave. Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.50 Vehicle Delay 17.8 Level of Service B ------------------------- S q 11 1 Phase 1 1 Phase 2 **/** ------------------------- North + +> ++++> --------------------- G/C=0.550 G/C=0.350 G= 44.0" G= 28.0" Y+R= 4.0" -Y+R= 4.0" OFF= 0.0% OFF=60.0`k ------------------------- C= 80 sec G= 72.0 sec = 90.0% Y= 8.0 sec = 10.0% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Lane g/C Service Rate Adj HCM L ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- lWidth/I Lanes ReqdUsed I @C (vph) @E v/c lVolumel ( Delay I S I90%MaxGroup Queue • NB Approach 10.7 B+ --------------------- --- ----------------------------------------------- -------------------------------- TH+RTI 24/2 10.255 10.550 1 1886 1 1914 1 703 10.367 1 10.7 1 B+1 178 ftj ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- EB Approach 22.8 C+ -------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------- ILT+TH 1 36/3 10.249 10.350 1 1549 ' 1677 1 987 10.589 1 22.8 1 C+1 240 ftj ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 00- 188 • • • Brickell Mainstreet MUSP Existing (1999) PM Peak Existing Cycle Length and Phasing 11 10/26/99 10:33:44 SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.001 - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS GRADES PEDLEVELS PARKINGSIDES PARKVOLUMES BUSVOLUMES RIGHTTURNONREDS 8 - SE 8 St. & Brickell Ave. SB WB NB EB 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 MODER MODER MODER MODER NONE NONE NONE NONE 20 20 20 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS RT TH LT 0 1047 160 0.0 36.0 24.0 0 3 2 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.87 0.87 0.87 3 3 3 NO NO YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 5085 3433 Phasing Parameters RT TH LT 458 309 0 12.0 24.0 0.0 1 2 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.96 0.96 0.96 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 DOPT NORM NORM 1406 3169 0 SEQUENCES 27 27 PERMISSIVES NO NO NO NO OVERLAPS YES NO YES YES CYCLES 115 115 10 GREENTIMES 8.00 55.00 24.00 10.00 YELLOWTIMES 3.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 CRITICALS 3 8 11 4 EXCESS 0 RT TH LT 135 837 0 12.0 24.0 0.0 1 2 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.88 0.88 0.88 3 3 3 NO NO YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 1406 3539 0 LEADLAGS a, OFFSET PEDTIME RT TH LT 213 202 304 0.0 24.0 24.0 0 2 2 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.92 0.92 0.92 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3094 3433 NONE LAG 0.00 1 0.0 0 188 • Brickell Mainstreet MUSP Existing (1999) PM Peak Existing Cycle Length and Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.001 - Capacity Analysis Summary 10/26/99 10:33:55 Intersection Averages for Int # 18 - SE 8 St. & Brickell Ave. Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.81 Vehicle Delay 124.2 Level of Service F __ _ _i Sq 27.1 Phase 1 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 1 Phase 4 **/LG -------------------->---------------------------- /I\ + *> + <++++ v v North Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% -- ---- LaneWidth/g/C ------------ Service RateAd7 --- -- HCML -- 90% Max Group ------------------------------------- I Lanesl Regd Used I QC (vph)-@E-IVolumel--v/c-I * + **** * + v 919 ------------------------------------------------- G/C=0.070 G/C=0.478 G/C=0.209 I G/C=0.087 G= 8.0" G= 55.0" G= 24.0" G= 10.0" Y+R= 3.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" OFF= 0.0% OFF= 9.6% OFF=61.7% OFF=87.0% C=115 sec G= 97.0 sec = 8,4.3% Y=18.0 sec = 15.7% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% -- ---- LaneWidth/g/C ------------ Service RateAd7 --- -- HCML -- 90% Max Group ------------------------------------- I Lanesl Regd Used I QC (vph)-@E-IVolumel--v/c-I -Delay-l-S-1-Queue-1 • SB Approach 21.1 C+ i= 2831 919 203 1184 I*B+lE+ 276 1 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ LT 24/2 10.242 10.574 0.070 1 12208 1 10.412 0.770 1 66.8 138 ft NB Approach 22.1 C+ RT 12/1 0.291 0.478 �538 672 153 0.228 18.4 B 129 ft 1 -------------------------------- TH 1 24/2 10.368 10.478 1 1513 1 --------------------------------------------- 1693 951 10.562 1 22.8 1*C+1 401 ft1 WB Approach 523.4 F RT 12/1+ 0.305 0.0871 97 238 1.951 508.8*F ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ TH 1 24/2-10.302 10.087 1 1 1 246 561 12.033 529.7 11 1 414 ftj EB Approach 43.3 D+ ----------------------------------------- ----------------------- ----------- ----- ------------ ---------------------------- I LT+RTI 24/2 10.261 10.209 1 1 l 716 l 330 10.700 0.461 l 40.3 I*D+l D 211 ft • • Brickell Mainstreet MUSP 10/26/99 Existing (1999) PM Peak 10:36:01 Existing Cycle Length and Optimized Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.001 - Summalry of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for I4t # 8 - SE 8 St. & Brickell-Ave. METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS SB WB NB EB GRADES 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 PEDLEVELS MODER MODER MODER MODER PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 20 20 20 20 BUSVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 0 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS RT TH LT 0 1047 160 0.0 36.0 24.0 0 3 2 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.87 0.87 0.87 3 3 3 NO NO YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 5085 3433 Phasing Parameters RT TH LT 458 309 0 12.0 24.0 0.0 1 2 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.96 0.96 0.96 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 DOPT NORM NORM 1406 3169 0 SEQUENCES 27 27 PERMISSIVES NO NO NO NO OVERLAPS YES NO YES YES CYCLES 115 115 10 GREENTIMiES 10.00 45.00 9.00 23.00 YELLOWTIMES 3.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 CRITICALS 3 8 11 4 EXCESS 0 RT TH LT 135 837 0 12.0 24.0 0.0 1 2 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.88 0.88 0.88 3 3 3 NO NO YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1:00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 1406 3539 0 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME RT TH LT 213 202 304 0.0 24.0 24.0 0 2 2 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.92 0.92 0.92 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3094 3433 NONE LAG 0.00 1 0.0 0 Brickell Mainstreet MUSP Existing.(1999) PM Peak Existing Cycle Length and Optimized Phasing S SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.001 - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # Degree of Saturation (v/c) --------------------------- Sq 27 Phase 1 Phase 2 **/LG --------------------------- + * + ' V, v North 10/26/99 10:36:10 8 SE 8 St. & Brickell Ave. .65 Vehicle Delay 39.2 Level of Service D+ --------------------- has- 3 1 Phase 4 --------------------- I ****I <++++I Lane Width C g/---------------------- �ervice ++++. Ad HCM L 90% Max Grou P -------I------I Lanes RegdUsed 1 C (vph) * + **** I Delay I S I Queue * + v 321 ------------------------------ G/C=0.087G/C=0.391 LT 24/2 -------------------------------- 0.242 /C=0.165 ------------- G/C=0.200 G= 10.0" G= 45.0" d= 19.0" G= 23.0" 1 Y+R= 3.0" Y+R= 5.0" l �+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" OFF= 0.0% OFF=11.3% FF=54.8% OFF=75.7% C=115 sec G= 97.0 sec = 4.3% Y=18.0 sec = 15.7% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% Lane Width C g/---------------------- �ervice Rate Ad HCM L 90% Max Grou P -------I------I Lanes RegdUsed 1 C (vph) @E IVolumel v/c --------------------------------- I Delay I S I Queue SB Approach 23.8 C+ TH 36/3 10.341 10.504 2401 619.1 2269 1184 203 B i*D 1 321 ft LT 24/2 -------------------------------- 0.242 0.087 1 1 ---------------------------------------------- 1565 10.615 1 54.4 136 ftl NB Approach ] 31.0 C RT 12/1 0.291 10.391 1 366 550 153 0.278151 l 1*C+1 ftj 1 TH 24/2 -------------------------------- 10.368 0.391 1078 1 ---------------------------------------------- 1385 1 951 10.687 31.9 468 ft WB Approach 60.7 E+ RT 238 0.847 65.0 1 308 i l TH 124/2±10.302 0.200 1 1 631 1 561 10.885 1 58.8 E+1 363 ft EB Approach 56.1 E+ -------------------------------- 24/2 0.284 10.165 1 ----------------------------------*E+ 1 497 452 10.885 63.7 1 305 ft 1 I LT+R.1 -------------------------------- 24/2 10.261 0.165 1 ---------------------------------------------- 1 555 330 10.582 1 45.9 1 D 223 ft 0- 188 0 0 • 0 Brickell Mainstreet MUSP 10/26/99 Existing (1999) PM Peak 08:34:26 Existing Cycle Length and Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.001 - Summary of Parameter.Values Intersection Parameters for Int # 9 - SW 13 St. & SW 2 Ave. METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS SB WB NB EB GRADES 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 PEDLEVELS MODER MODER MODER MODER PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 20 20 20 20 BUSVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 1 0 0 0 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS. TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS RT TH LT 263 168 136 12.0 12.0 0.0 1 1 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.85 0.85 0.85 . 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00.1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 1406 1400 0 Phasing Parameters SEQUENCES 11 ALL PERMISSIVES NO NO OVERLAPS YES YES CYCLES 100 100 GREENTIMES 22.00 30.00 YELLOWTIMES 4.00 4.00 CRITICALS 0 0 EXCESS 0 3 RT TH LT 143 1066 14 0.0 24.0 0.0 0 2 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 '2.0 0.82 0.82 0.82 3 3 3 NO NO NO 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3262 0 NO NO YES YES 10 RT TH LT 20 80 114 0.0 12.0 0.0 0 1 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 .1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 903 0 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME RT TH IT 4 343 66 0.0 24.0 0.0 0 2 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.95 0.95 0.95 3 3 3 NO NO NO .4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 2205 0 NONE NONE 0.00 1 0.0 0 0®- 188 Brickell Mainstreet MUSP Existing (1999) PM Peak Existing Cycle Length and Phasin SIGNAL97./TEAPAC[Ver 1.001 - Capa,ity Analysis Summary 10/26/99 08:34:35 Intersection Averages for Int # 9 - SW 13 St. & SW 2 Ave. Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.76 Vehicle Delay 20.5 Level of Service C+ Sq 11 North ------------------------- Phase 1 1 Phase 2 1 ------------------------- <+ + +> <++++ v ++++ A + + + + v <+ + +> ++++> + + + v ------------------------- G/C=0.367 G/C=0.500 G= 22.0" G= 30.0" Y+R= 4.0" Y+R= 4.0" OFF= 0.0% OFF=43.3% ------------------------- C= 60 sec G= 52.0 sec = 86.7% Y= 8.0 sec = 13.3% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Lane g/C Service Rate Adj 1 HCM I L 190% MaxGroup 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (Width/1 Lanes Reqd Used 1 @C (vph) @E v/c lVolumel Delay S Queue • SB Approach 18.9 B RT 12/1 0.266 0.36717.3 B 165 ft ILT+TH 1 12/1 10.300 10.367 I 456 I 513 I 358 10.698 1309 0.599 20.3 I C+I 191 ftI ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NB Approach 26.0 C+ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ILT+TH+RTI 12/1 10,335 10.367 1 279 1 331 1 249 10.752 1 26.0 1 C+j 133 ftl ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WB Approach 23.3 C+ ILT+TH+RTI 24/2 10.465 10.500 1 1616 1 1631 1 1491 10.914 1 23.3 1 C+1 314 ftj ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- EB Approach 10.4 B+ ILT+TH+RTI 24/2 10.240 10.500 1 1067 1 1102 1 434 10.394 1 10.4 1 B+1 92 ftj ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0 • C Brickell Mainstreet MUSP 10/26/99 Existing (1999) PM Peak 08:35:04 Existing Cycle Length and Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.001 - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # 10 - SW 13 St. & SW 1 Ave. METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS SB WB NB EB GRADES 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 PEDLEVELS MODER MODER MODER MODER PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 20 20 20 20 BUSVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 0 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS RT TH LT 237 106 41 12.0 12.0 12.0 1 1 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.87 0.87 0.87 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 1406 1863 1770 Phasing Parameters SEQUENCES 11 ALL PERMISSIVES NO NO OVERLAPS YES YES CYCLES 60 60 GREENTIMES 19.00 33.00 YELLOWTIMES 4.00 4.00 CRITICALS 0 0 EXCESS 0 RT TH LT 0 978 5 0.0 24.0 0.0 0 2 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.80 0.80 0.80 3 3 3 NO NO NO 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3373 0 NO NO YES YES 10 RT TH LT 12 0 35 0.0 12.0 0.0 0 1 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.60 0.60 0.60 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 1268 0 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME RT TH LT 22 457 0 0.0 24.0 0.0 0 2 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.90 0.90 0.90 3 3 3 NO NO NO 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3500 0 NONE NONE 0.00 1 0.0 0 010 188 • Brickell Mainstreet MUSP 10/26/99 Existing (1999) PM Peak 08:35:14 Existing Cycle Length and Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.001 - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 10 - SW 13 St. & SW 1 Ave. Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.51 Vehicle Delay 11.8 Level of Service B+ ------------------------- Sq 11 Phase 1 Phase 2 **/** ------------------------- +> <++++ v ++++ v North <+ +>I++++> + + I++++ + + I v ------------------------- G/C=0.317 G/C=0.550 G= 19.0" G= 33.0-- Y+R= 4.0" Y+R= 4.0" OFF= 0.0% OFF=38.3% ------------------------- C= 60 sec G= 52.0 sec = 86.7% Y= 8.0 sec = 13.3% Ped= O.O.sec = 0.0% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Lane Width/ g/C Service Rate Ad' HCM L Max Group I Lanesl Reqd Used I @C (vph) @E IVolumel v/c I Delay I S 190% Queue ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SB Approach 18.0 B -------------------------------- RT 12/1 10.240 10.317 1 ------ 384 ---- - ---- 445 1 272 --------------------------- 0.611 19.8 B157 ft TH 12/1 0.099 0.317 525 590 122 10.207 15.2 B 70 ft LT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- l 12/1 0.049 0.317 496 560 47 0.084 14.5. B+ 27 ft NB Approach 12.3 B+ ILT+TH+RTI 12/1 10.099 10.383 1 431 1 486 1 78 10.160 1 12.3 1 B+1 41 ftl ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WB Approach 11.4 B+ ILT+TH 1 24/2 10.380 10.550 1 1855 1 1855 1 1228 10.662 1 11.4 1 B+1 233 ft) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- EB Approach 7.5 A TH+RTJ 24/2 10.184 10.550 1 1925 1 1925 1 532 10.276 1 7.5 1 A 1 101 ftj ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- • • • Brickell Mainstreet MUSP 10/26/99 Existing (1999) PM Peak 10:40:58 Existing Cycle Length and Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.001 - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # 11 - S 13 St. & S Miami Ave. METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS SB WB NB EB GRADES 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 PEDLEVELS MODER MODER MODER MODER PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES .20 20 20 20 BUSVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 0 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS RT TH LT 135 135 12 0.0 24.0 0.0 0 2 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.76 0.76 0.76 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 2929 0 Phasing Parameters SEQUENCES 11 ALL PERMISSIVES NO NO OVERLAPS YES YES' CYCLES 60 60 GREENTIMES 18.00 32.00 YELLOWTIMES 5.00 5.00 CRITICALS 0 0 EXCESS 0 RT TH LT 86 869 39 0.0 24.0 0.0 0 2 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.82 0.82 0.82 3 3 3 NO NO NO 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3157 0 NO NO YES YES 10 RT TH LT 35 101 73 0.0 24.0 0.0 0 2 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.94 0.94 0.94 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM.NORM 0 2506 0 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME RT TH LT 44 387 71 0.0 24.0 0.0 0 2 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.88 0.88 0.88 3 3 3 NO NO NO 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 2309 0 NONE NONE 0.00 1 0.0 0 `'off WIN; Brickell Mainstreet MUSP 10/26/99 Existing.(1999) PM Peak 10:41:09 Existing Cycle Length and Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.001 - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages .for Int # 11 - S 13 St. & S Miami Ave. Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.57 Vehicle Delay 13.4 Level of Service B+ ------------------------- S q 11 Phase 1 Phase 2 **/** ------------------------- + + + ++++ /I\ <+ + +> <++++ v ++++ A North ++++ v <+ + +> ++++> + + + v ----------------- G/C=0.300 G/C=0.533 G= 18.0" G= 32.0" Y+R='5.0" Y+R= 5.0" OFF= 0.0% OFF=38.3% ------------------------- C= 60 sec G= 50.0 sec = 83.3% Y=10.0 sec = 16.7% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Lane Service Rate Adj HCM L 190% MaxGroupLanes ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- lIWidth/I g/C Reqd Used CSC (vph) I QE lVolumel v/c I Delay I S Queue • SB Approach 17.2 B ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ILT+TH+RTI 24/2 10.157 10.300 1 809 1 879 1 372 10.423 1 17.2 1 B 1 110 ftj ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NB Approach 16.3 B ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ILT+TH+RTI 24/2 10.120 10.300 1 683 1 752 1 222 10.295 1 16.3 1 B 1 66 ftj ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WB Approach 13.3 B+ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ILT+TH+RTI 24/2 10.400 10.533 1 1678 1 1684 1 1213 10.720 1 13.3 1 B+1 239 ftj ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- EB Approach 9.9 A ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ILT+TH+RT' 24/2 10.284 10.533 1 1207 1 1231 1 571 10.464 1 9.9 1 A 1 112 ftj ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 00— 1O8 • • • Brickell Mainstreet MUSP 10/26/99 Existing (1999) PM Peak 10:31:46 Existing Cycle Length and Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.001 - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # 12 - SE 13 St. & Brickell Ave.. METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS SB WB NB EB GRADES 0.0 .0.0 0.0 0.0 PEDLEVELS MODER MODER MODER MODER PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE, NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 20 20 20 20 BUSVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 0 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS RT TH LT 593 1020 38 12.0 24.0 12.0 1 2 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.89 0.89 0.89 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 1406 3539 758 Phasing Parameters RT TH LT 62 262 122 12.0 12.0 12.0 1 1 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.89 0.89 0.89 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 1406 1863 1770 SEQUENCES 17 ALL PERMISSIVES NO NO NO OVERLAPS NO YES YES CYCLES 100 100 10 GREENTIMES 69.00 15.00 16.00 YELLOWTIMES 5.00 5.00 5.00 CRITICALS 0 0 0 EXCESS 0 NO YES RT TH LT 26 523 127 0.0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.95 0.95 0.95 3 3 3 NO NO YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3499 340 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME RT TH LT 106 76 190 12.0 12.0 12.0 1 1 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.92 0.92 0.92 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.001.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM DOPT 1406 1822 1770 NONE LAG 0.00 1 0.0 0 Brickell Mainstreet MUSP 10/26/99 Existing (1999) PM Peak 10:31:57 Existing Cycle Length and Phasing • SIGNAL97./TEAPAC[Ver 1.001 - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 12 - SE 13 St. & Brickell Ave. Degree of Saturation (v/c) .0.60 Vehicle Delay 33.2 Level of Service C ------------------------------------- Sq 17 Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 **/LG ------------------------------------- < . ------------------------------------<+ + +> <++++ v " ++++ North ++++ v <+ + +> ++++> + + + v ------------------------------------- G/C=0.600 G/C=0.130 G/C=0.139 G= 69.0" G= 15.0" 1 G= 16.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" OFF= 0.0% OFF=64.3% OFF=81.7% ------------------------------------- C=115 sec G=100.0 sec = 87.0% Y=15.0 sec = 13.0% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% --------- Lane --------------------- Width/I g/C I ---------- I Service ---- Rate -------- Adj lVolumel --------------- 1 HCM I --- L --------- 190`kMaxi-- - LanesReqdUsedCSC(vph)CSEv/c- -- --- --- - - -----Group TH Delay---S---Queue- 0.396 0.600 SB Approach 16.9 B ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- RT 12/1 0.538 0.600 774 844 1 666 10.789 22.6 1 C+j 431 ft TH 24/2 0.396 0.600 2059 1 2124 1146 0.540 13.9B+ 1.135 370 ft 1 LT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 12/1 0.249 0.600 394 455 43 10.095 9.8 1 A 28 ft NB Approach 13.5 B+ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- THJ 24/2 0 307 0.600 11.3 87 1 LT+RT1 12/1 10.535 10.600 1 2160 + 2201 1 134 10.275 0.657 1 22.7 1 C+1.187 ft 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WB Approach 106.0 F RT 12/1 0.243 0.139 1 171 70 0.357 46.0 D 97 ft TH 12/1 0.295 0.139 1 234 294 1.135 146.8 F 409 ft LT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 12/1 0.255 0.139 1 221 137 0.557 49.0 D 191 ft EB Approach 52.7 D RT 12/1_10.258 0.130 I 1 157 115 0.628 54.1 1 D 162 ft TH 12/1- 0.257 0.130 1 212 149 0.626 52.5 D 209 ft LT -------------- 0_256--0_130-----1-�--205-�--141--0_610----51_9- -D---198-ft- • • • • 0 Brickell Mainstreet MUSP 10/26/99 Existing (1999) PM Peak 10:36:45 Existing Cycle Length and Optimized Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC{Ver 1.001 - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # 12 - SE 13 St. & Brickell Ave. METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS SB WB NB EB GRADES 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 PEDLEVELS MODER MODER MODER MODER PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 20 20 20 20 BUSVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 0 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS RT TH LT 593 1020 38 12.0 24.0 12.0 1 2 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.89 0.89 0.89 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 1406 3539 741 Phasing Parameters RT TH LT 62 262 122 12.0 12.0 12.0 1 1 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2:0 0.89 0.89 0.89 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 1406 1863 1770 SEQUENCES 17 ALL PERMISSIVES NO NO NO OVERLAPS NO YES YES CYCLES 100 100 10 GREENTIMES 64.00 15.00 21.00 YELLOWTIMES 5.00 5.00 5.00 CRITICALS 0 0 0 EXCESS 0 NO YES RT TH . LT. 26 523 127 0.0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.95 0.95 0.95 3 3 3 NO NO YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3499 312 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME RT TH LT 106 76 190 12.0 12.0 12.0 1 1 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.92 0.92 0.92 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM DOPT 1406 1822 1770 NONE LAG 0.00 1 0.0 0 1,'i 188 i Brickell Mainstreet MUSP 10/26/99 Existing (1999) PM Peak 10:36:57 Existing Cycle Length and Optimized Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.001 - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages.for Int # 12 - SE 13 St. & Brickell Ave. . Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.60 Vehicle Delay 29.7 Level of Service C ------------------------------------- Sq 17 1 Phase 1 1 Phase 2 1 Phase 3 1 **/LG'------------------------------------- /I\ <+ + +> <++++ v ++++ North ++++ v <+ + +> ++++> + + + v ------------------------------------- G/C=0.557 G/C=0.130 G/C=0.183 G= 64.0" G= 15.0" G= 21.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" OFF= 0.0`k OFF=60.0% OFF=77.4% ------------------------------------- C=115 sec G=100.0 sec = 87.0% Y=15.0 sec = 13.0% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Lane (Width/I g/C 1 Service Ratel Adj l I HCM I L 190% Maxl ---Group---Lanes--Regd--- Used - @C(vph)@EVolume - - -- v/cDelaySQueue-- --- --- --- TH SB Approach 21.8 C+ ------------------------------------------------ RT 12/1 0.538 698 782 666 -- 0.852 30.5 C 477 ft TH 24/2 0.396 10.557 0.557 1874 1970 1146 0.582 17.2 B. 411 ft 1 LT 12/1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0.250 10.557 345 412 43 0.104 12.1 B+ 31 ft NB Approach 18.6 B ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- THJ 24/2 0.307 0.557 842 947 13.9 07 I LT+RT1 12/1 10.572 10.557 11130 11167 I 134 10.297 0.770 I 38.6 I D+I 296 ft ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WB Approach 55.9 E+ ----------------------------------------------------------------- RT 12/1 0.243 0.183 1 235 70 0.272 41.0 D+ 92 ft TH 12/1 0.295 0.183 1 320 294 0.865 65.7 E+ 388 ft LT 12/1 0.255 0.183 1 303 137 0.424 42.5 D+ 181 ft ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- EB Approach 52.7 D RT 12/10.258 0.130 1 157 115 0.628 54.1 D 162 ft TH 12/1- 0.257 0.130 1 212 149 0.626 52.5 D 209 ft ----LT-----12/1+-0_256--0_130------1----205----141--0_610----51 9---D---198-ft- C 10 - -1. 8 8 • HCS: Unsignaliz*Intersections Release A SW9&SW1.HC0 Page 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 Streets: (N --S) SW 1ST AVENUE (E -W) SW 9TH STREET Major Street Direction.... NS Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) Analyst. HAN Date of Analysis.......... 10/7/99 Other Information ......... BRICKELL MAINSTREET MUSP-EXISTING Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection -------------------------------- Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound L T R L T. R L T RL T R No. Lanes Stop/Yield Volumes PHF Grade MCIs M SU/RV's (%) CV's M PCE Is 0. 0 0 Maneuver ---------------- Time (tf) ------------------------------------------------------------------ Left Turn Major Road N 0 2 0 N 336 .883 0 ---------------- Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) ------------------------------------------------------------------ Left Turn Major Road 5.50 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.50 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 7.00 3.40 r� Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph)(sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh) -------- ------ ------ -------------------- ----- --------- WB L 194 604 8.8 1.6 B 8.8 Intersection Delay = 2.4 sec/veh F - I M1,410, HCS: Unsi9 nalized Intersections Release 2.I"g SW9&SW1.HC0 Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection --- -------------------------------------------------------- Step 4: LT from Minor Street WB EB --------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 381 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 604 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 1.00 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 1.00 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 1.00 Movement Capacity: (pcph) -------------------------------------------------------- 604 r� Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph)(sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh) -------- ------ ------ -------------------- ----- --------- WB L 194 604 8.8 1.6 B 8.8 Intersection Delay = 2.4 sec/veh F - I M1,410, • • • HCS: UnsignalisIntersections Release MIAMI&S9.HC0 Page 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 ------------------------------ Streets: (N -S) S. MIAMI AVENUE (E -W) S 9TH STREET. Major Street Direction.... NS Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) Analyst. HAN Date of Analysis.......... 10/7/99 Other Information ......... BRICKELL MAINSTREET MUSP-EXISTING Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection NorthboundSouthbound Eastbound Westbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes Stop/Yield Volumes PHF Grade MCIs M SU/RV's M CV' s ( %) PCE Is ------------ 0 > 2 < 0 N 0 393 0 .841 .841 .841 0 1.10 --------------- 0 0 0 Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) -----------------------------------------=------------------------ Left Turn Major Road N---------------, Adjustment Factors 0 J. < 0 114 97 .863 .863 0 1.10 1.10 --------------- Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) -----------------------------------------=------------------------ Left Turn Major Road 5.50 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.50 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 7.00 3.40 OU- 188 i Intersection Performance Summary • Avg. 95% HCS: Unsignal�,zed Intersectionsg Release 2.1g MIAMI&S9.HC0 Page 2 Shared Worksheet for TWSC Intersection Queue Approach --- Step -l: RT from Minor Street WB EB Delay -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 234 Movement (pcph) (pcph) Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1054 (veh) (sec/veh) --------- Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1054 ------ > ------- Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.88 WB R 123 1054 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 2: LT from Major Street SB NB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 1714 0 2.1 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 0.0 1714 Intersection Delay = Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1714 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 1.00 TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 3400 RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 Major LT Shared Lane Prob. of Queue -Free State: -------------------------------------------------------- 1.00 Step 3: TH from Minor Street WB EB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 467 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 582 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1.00 582 Prob. of Queue Free State: -------------------------------------------------------- 0.75 i Intersection Performance Summary a®- 188 Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph)(sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh) --------- -------- ------ WB T 14.5 ------ 582 ------ > ------- ------- ----- 7.7 WB R 123 1054 > 733 7.7 1.9 B NB L 0 1714 2.1 0.0 A 0.0 Intersection Delay = 2.7 sec/veh a®- 188 • • 0 HCS: Unsignali-O Intersections Release 20 SE1&SE9.HC0 Page 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville., FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392.-0378 --------------------------------- Streets: (N -S) SE 1ST AVENUE (E -W) SE 9TH STREET Major Street Direction.... NS Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) Analyst...-.....:-.--' HAN Date of Analysis.......... 10/7/99 Other Information ......... BRICKELL MAINSTREET MUSP-EXISTING Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection -------------------------------------------- NorthboundSouthbound Eastbound Westbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes, Stop/Yield Volumes PHF Grade MC's (%) SU/RV's (%) CV's M PCE 's ------------ 0 > 1 0 N 18 54 .83 .83 0 1.10 --------------- 0 1 < 0 N 142 152 .815 .815 0 ---------------- Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) ------------------------------------------------------------------ Left Turn Major Road 5.00 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.00 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 6.50 3.40 in, r1l I 9W Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1g SE1&SE9.HC0 Page 2 Shared for TWSC Intersection Queue Approach -----------Worksheet ------------------------------------ Step l: RT from Minor Street WB EB Delay --------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) LOS Delay 268 (pcph) Potential Capacity: (pcph) ------- 1013 (sec/veh) ----- --------- 'Movement Capacity: (pcph) ------ 646 1013 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 1.00 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 2: LT from Major'Street SB NB A 3.6 -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 1013 361 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1154 1154 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 3.2 1154 A 0.8 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.98 TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) Major.LT Shared Lane Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.98 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 4: LT from Minor Street WB EB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 354 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 660 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0.98 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.98 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.98 Movement Capacity: (pcph) -------------------------------------------------------- 646 Intersection Performance Summary Intersection Delay = • 0.2 sec/veh Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph)(sec/veh) ------- (veh) ------- (sec/veh) ----- --------- -------- ------ EB L 0 ------ 646 ------ > 1013 3.6 0.0 A 3.6 EB R 4 1013 > NB L 24 1154 3.2 0.0 A 0.8 Intersection Delay = • 0.2 sec/veh 0 • • HCS: Unsignalis Intersections Release SW10&SW1.HC0 Page 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University. of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 Streets (N -S) SW 1ST AVENUE. (E -W) SW 10TH STREET Major Street Direction.... NS Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) Analyst ................... HAN Date of Analysis.......... 10/7/99 Other.Information......... BRICKELL MAINSTREET MUSP-EXISTING Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection ------------------------- NorthboundSouthbound Eastbound Westbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes Stop/Yield Volumes PHF Grade MC's (o) SU/RV's (%) CV's ( o) PCE 's ------------ 0 0 0 Maneuver --------------- Time (tf) ------------------------------------------------------------------ Left Turn Major Road N 0 > 2 0 N 73 412 .891 .891 0 1.10 ---------------- Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) ------------------------------------------------------------------ Left Turn Major Road 5.50 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.50 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 7.00 3.40 • 9WJ SB L 90 1714 2.2 0.0 A 0.3 Intersection Delay = 1.0 sec/veh HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1g SW10&SW1.HC0 Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection - -----=--=----------------------------------------------- Step 2: LT from Major Street SB NB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 0 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1714 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1714 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.95 TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 3400 Major LT Shared Lane Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.94 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 4: LT from Minor Street WB EB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflict.ing Flows: (vph) 544 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 475 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0.94 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.94 Capacity Adjustment Factor. due to Impeding Movements 0.94 Movement Capacity: (pcph) -------------------------------------------------------- 446 Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 950 Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph) (sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh) -------- ------ ------ ------ WB L 81 446 -------------- ----- 9.9 0.7 B --------- • 9WJ SB L 90 1714 2.2 0.0 A 0.3 Intersection Delay = 1.0 sec/veh • • 9 HCS: Unsignalio Intersections Release 20 MIAMI&10.HC0 Page 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904).392-0378 ---------------------------- Streets: (N -S) S. MIAMI AVENUE (E -W) S 10TH STREET. Major Street Direction.... NS Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) Analyst. HAN Date of .Analysis.......... 10/7/99 Other Information ......... BRICKELL MAINSTREET MUSP-EXISTING Two-way Stop-controlled.Intersection ------------------------------------------ NorthboundSouthbound Eastbound Westbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes Stop/Yield Volumes PHF Grade MC's ( o) SU/RV's (%) CV's M PCE 's ------------ 0 > 2 < 0 N 9 266 12 .799 .799 .799 0 1.10 0 0 0 Maneuver ---------------- Time,.(tf) ------------------------------------------------------------------ Left Turn Major Road N Adjustment Factors 0 1 < 0 38 145 .767 .767 0 1.10 1.10 Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time,.(tf) ------------------------------------------------------------------ Left Turn Major Road 5.50 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.50 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 7.00 3.40 • 00-- 188 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2:1g MIAMI&10.HC0 Page 2 for TWSC Intersection --Worksheet -=------- ------------------------------------------- Step 1: RT from Minor Street WB EB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 174 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1130 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1130 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.82 ------------------------------------------=------------- Step 2: LT from Major Street SB ---------------- `NB. --------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 0 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1714 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1714 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.99 TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 3400 RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 Major LT Shared Lane Prob. of Queue -Free State: -------------------------------------------------------- 0.99 Step 3: TH from Minor Street WB EB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 352 359 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 679 673 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements Movement Capacity: (pcph) 0.99 674 0.99 668 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.92 0.97 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 4: LT from Minor Street WB EB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 370 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 614 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0.91 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.93 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.76 Movement Capacity: (pcph) -------------------------------------------------------- 467 • 00-- 188 HCS: Unsignali-A Intersectiohs' Release SE1&SEl0.HC0 Page 1 -------------------------- Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall . Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 Streets: (N -S) SE 1ST AVENUE (E -W) SE 10TH STREET Analyst ................... HAN Date of Analysis.......... 10/7/99 Other Information ......... BRICKELL MAINSTREET MUSP-EXISTING All -way Stop -controlled Intersection Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound L T R L T. R L T R L T ---- ---- R ---- No. Lanes ---- ---- ---- 0 > 1 < 0 ---- ---- ---- 0 > 1 < 0 ---- ---- 0 > 1 ---- < 0 0 > 1 < 0 Volumes 14 55 19 19 125 14 3 11 12 97 259 17 PHF .724 .724 .724 ..875 .875 .875 .646 .646 .646 .877 .877 .877 ------------------------------- ---------------------------------------- Volume Summary and Capacity Analysis Worksheet ----------------------------------------------------------------------- NB SB EB WB ----------------------------------------------------------------------- LT.Flow Rate 19 22 5 111 RT Flow Rate 26 16 19 19 Approach Flow Rate 121 181 41 425 Proportion LT 0.16 0.12 0.12 0.26 Proportion RT 0.21 0.09 0.46 0.04 Opposing Approach Flow Rate 181 121 425 41 Conflicting Approaches Flow Rate 466 466 302 302 Proportion, Subject Approach Flow Rate 0.16 0.24 0.05 0.55 Proportion, Opposing Approach Flow Rate 0.24 0.16 0.55 0.05 Lanes on Subject.Approach 1 1 1 1 Lanes on Opposing Approach 1 1 1 1 LT, Opposing Approach 22 19 111 5 RT, Opposing Approach 16 26 19 19 LT, Conflicting Approaches 116 116 41 41 RT, Conflicting Approaches 38 38 42 42 Proportion LT, Opposing Approach .0.12 0.16 0.26 0.12 Proportion RT, Opposing Approach 0.09 0.21 0.04 0.46 Proportion LT, Conflicting Approaches 0.25 0.25 0.14 0.14 Proportion RT, Conflicting Approaches 0.08 0.08 0.14 0.14 Approach Capacity ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 354 392 472 748 Intersection Performance Summary Approach Approach V/C Average Movement Flow Rate Capacity Ratio Total Delay LOS ---- ---------- ---------- --------- NB 121 354 ------- 0.34 ----------- 3.7 A SB 181 392 0.46 5.8 B EB 41 472 0.09 1.4 A WB 425 748 0.57 8.7 B Intersection Delay = 6.8 Level of Service (Intersection) = B 00- 188 • APPENDIX D Future (2OO2) Levelof Service- Calculations without the Project �J I] 0 Brickell Mainstreet MUSP 10/26/99 Future wo Project (2001) PM Peak 08:42:56 Existing Cycle Length and Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC(Ver 1.001 - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS GRADES PEDLEVELS PARKINGSIDES PARKVOLUMES BUSVOLUMES RIGHTTURNONREDS 1 - SW 7 St. & SW 2 Ave. SB WB NB EB 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 MODER MODER MODER MODER NONE NONE NONE NONE .20 20 20 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS RT TH LT 173 532 0 0.0 24.0 0.0 0 2 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.88 0.88 0.88 3 3 3 NO NO NO 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3326 0 Phasing Parameters SEQUENCES 11 ALL PERMISSIVES NO NO OVERLAPS YES YES CYCLES 80 80 GREENTIMES 32.00 40.00 YELLOWTIMES 4.00 4.00 CRITICALS 0 0 EXCESS 0 RT TH LT 125 1292 126 0.0 36.0 0.0 0 3 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.80 0.80 0.80 3 3 3 NO NO NO 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 19001900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 4885 0 NO NO YES YES 10 RT TH LT 0 367 200 0.0 24.0 0.0 0 2 0 .0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.94 0.94 0.94 3 3 3 NO NO NO 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 1977 0 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME RT TH LT 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.90 0.90 0.90 3 3 3 NO NO NO 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 0 0 NONE NONE 0.00 1 0.0 0 Brickell Mainstreet MUSP 10/26/99 Future wo Project (2001) PM Peak 08:43:07 Existing Cycle Length and Phasing SIG NAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.001 - Capacity Analysis Sunmary Intersection Averages.for Int # 1 - SW 7 St. & SW 2 Ave. Degree.of Saturation (v/c) 0.74 Vehicle Delay 21.2 Level of Service C+ Sq 11 /•, North I ------------------------- Phase 1 1 Phase 2 1 -------.------------------ + + l ++++ <+ + <++++ v ++++ v + + + + --------- ------------- G/C=0.400 G/C=0.500 G= 32..0" G= 40.0-- Y+R= 4.0" Y+R= 4.0" OFF= 0.0% OFF=45.0% ------------------------- C= 80 sec G= 72.0 sec = 90.0% Y= 8.0 sec = 10.0`k Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- LaneWidth/I g/C Service Rate Adj HCM L Maxl---Group-II I Lanes-- --- --- - lVolumel ----- I DelaySQueue I --- ---ReqdUsedeC(vph)CSEWe 190% -- • SB Approach 21.0 C+ I TH+RTI 24/2 10.289 10.400 1 1230 1 1330 1 802 10.603 1 21.0 I C+1 271 ftl ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NB Approach 27.6 C ________________________ ---------------- 1LT+TH 1 24/2 10.362 10.400 1 692 1 791 1 603 10.762 1 27.6 1 C 1 203 ftl ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WB Approach 19.2 B ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ILT+TH+RT1 36/3 10.412 10.500 1 2409 1 2442 1 1928 10.790 1 19.2 1 B 1 361 ftl ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 00 188 0 • • Brickell Mainstreet MUSP 10/26/99 Future wo Project (2001) PM Peak 08:43:30 Existing Cycle Length and Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters.for Int # METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS GRADES PEDLEVELS PARKINGSIDES PARKVOLUMES BUSVOLUMES RIGHTTURNONREDS 2 SW 7 St. & SW 1 Ave. SB WB NB EB 0.0 .0.0 0.0 0.0 MODER MODER MODER MODER NONE NONE NONE NONE 20 20 20 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS RT TH LT 273 358 0 12.0 24.0 0.0 1 2 0 0.00 0.00.0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.91 0.91 0.91 3 3 3 NO NO NO 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 DOPT NORM NORM 1406 3373 0 Phasing Parameters SEQUENCES 11 ALL PERMISSIVES NO NO OVERLAPS YES YES CYCLES 80 80 GREENTIMES 36.00 33.00 YELLOWTIMES 5.00 6.00 CRITICALS 1 1 EXCESS 0 RT TH LT 0 1335 102 0.0 36.0 0.0 0 3 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0' 0.79 0.79 0.79 3 13 3 NO NO NO 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 4997 0 NO NO YES YES 10 RT TH LT 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.90 0.90 0.90 3 3 13 NO NO NO 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 0 0 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME RT TH LT 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.90 0.90 0.90 3 3 3 NO NO NO 4.0 .4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.001.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 0 0 NONE NONE 0.00 1 0.0 0 Brickell Mainstreet MUSP 10/26/99 Future wo Project (2001) PM Peak 08:43:40 Existing Cycle Length and Phasing SIGNAL97,/TEAPAC[Ver 1.001 - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 2 - SW 7 St. & SW 1 Ave. Degree of Saturation (v/c) .0.73 Vehicle Delay 24.1 Level of Service C+ ------------------------- Sq 11 Phase 1 Phase 2 **/** ------------------------- * + I* + v ++++ v North ------------------------- G/C=0.450 G/C=0.412 G= 36.0" G= 33.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 6.0" OFF= 0.0% OFF=51.3% -------------------------- C= 80 sec G= 69.0 sec = 86.3% Y=11.0 sec = 13.8% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Lane g/C I Service Rate Adj lVolumel I HCM I L I90%Maxi Group ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (Width/I Lanes Reqd Used eC (vph) CSE v/c Delay S Queue • SB Approach 15.0 B+ RT .551 633 207 128 ftl 0.450 1442 1 1518 1 486 10.327 TH 1 24/2±10.241 0.207 10.450 1 0.320 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 14.7 1*B+1 150 ftl WB Approach 27.6 C ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- JLT+TH 1 36/3 10.385 10.412 1 1975 1 2061 1 1819 10.883 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 27.6 1 C 1 401 ftl M 1 r • • Brickell Mainstreet MUSP 10/26/99 Future wo Project (2001) PM Peak 08:44:07 Existing Cycle Length and Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.001 - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVIC$ C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS GRADES PEDLEVELS PARKINGSIDES PARKVOLUMES BUSVOLUMES RIGHTTURNONREDS 3 - S 7 St. & S. Miami Ave. SB WB NB EB 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 MODER MODER MODER MODER NONE NONE NONE NONE 20 20 20 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS RT TH LT 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.90 0.90 0.90 3 3 3 NO NO NO 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 0 0 Phasing Parameters SEQUENCES 11 ALL PERMISSIVES NO NO OVERLAPS YES YES CYCLES 100 100 GREENTIMES 35.00 36.00 YELLOWTIMES 4.00 5.00 CRITICALS 0 0 EXCESS 0 3 RT TH LT 57 972 0 12.0 24.0 0.0 1 2 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.81 0.81 0.81 3 3 3 NO NO NO 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 1406 3539 0 NO NO YES YES 10 RT TH LT 0 480 410 0.0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.92 0.92 0.92 3 3 3 NO NO NO 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM DOPT 0 3362 1406 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME RT TH IT 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.90 0.90 0.90 3 3 3 NO NO NO 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 0 0 NONE NONE 0.00 1 0.0 0 M�W Brickell Mainstreet MUSP 10/26/99 Future wo Project (2001) PM Peak 08:44:16 Existing Cycle Length and Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.001 - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 3 - S 7 St. & S. Miami Ave. Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.61 Vehicle Delay 19.6 Level of Service B ------------------------- Sq 11 1 Phase 1 I Phase 2 1 **/** ------------------------- T North <+ + + + + + ----------- -------------- G/C=0.438 G/C=0.450 G= 35.0" G= 36.0" Y+R= 4.0" Y+R= 5.0" OFF= 0.0% OFF=48.8% ------------------------- C= 80 sec G= 71.0 sec = 88.8% Y= 9.0 sec = 11.3% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Lane g/C 1 Service Rate Adj lVolumel 1 HCM I L 190% Maxl-- 1 --- (Width/l -- --- - @C(vph)@E - - -GroupLanesReqdUsed v/c-Delay---S---Queue-- NB Approach 17.5 B ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 24/2- 0.250 0.438 471 656 0.446 16.7 207 I LT 12/1+10.306 10.438 1 1530 1615 312 10.507 1 19.2 1 B 1 197 ft ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WB Approach 21.2 C+ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- RT 12/1 0.147 0.450 551 633 70 0.111 1 TH 24/2 10.372 10.450 1 1518 1 1593 1 1200 10.753 1 21.7 1 C+1 371 ft1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- mm� • • Brickell Mainstreet MUSP Future wo Project (2001) PM Peak Existing Cycle Length and Phasing 10/26/99 10:45:01 SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.001 - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS GRADES PEDLEVELS PARKINGSIDES PARKVOLUMES BUSVOLUMES RIGHTTURNONREDS 4 - SE 7 St. & Brickell Ave. SB WB NB EB 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 MODER MODER MODER MODER NONE NONE NONE NONE 20 20 20 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS RT TH LT 229 1189 11 12.0 24.0 12.0 1 2 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.88 0.88 0.88 3 3 3 NO NO YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 1406 3539 1770 Phasing Parameters RT TH LT 119 328 109 0.0 24.0 0.0 0 2 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.68 0.68 0.68 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3192 0 SEQUENCES 61 ALL PERMISSIVES YES NO NO NO OVERLAPS YES YES YES YES CYCLES 100 100 10 GREENTIMES 6.00 24.00 49.00 20.00 YELLOWTIMES 3.00 3.00 5.00 5.00 CRITICALS 0 0 0 0 EXCESS 0 RT TH LT 11 1341 674 0.0 36.0 24.0 0 3 2 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.84 0.84 0.84 3 3 3 NO NO YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 5075 3433 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME RT TH LT 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.90 0.90 0.90 3 3 3 NO NO NO 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 0 0 NONE NONE 0.00 1 0.0 0 11 Brickell Mainstreet MUSP 10/26/99 Future wo Project (2001) PM Peak 10:45:13 Existing Cycle Length and Phasing .F SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.001 - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages.for Int # 4 - SE 7 St. & Brickell Ave. Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.81 Vehicle Delay 68.3 Level of Service E ------------------------------------------------- Sq 61 1 Phase 1 1 Phase 2 1 Phase 3 1 Phase 4 1 **/** -------.------------------------------------------ + + + + + + + + ++++ / +> <+ + +> 4I <++++ v ++++ v North <+ <+ + +> + +>I + + + + + + + + + + + + ------------------------------------------------- G/C=0.052 G/C=0.209 G/C=0.426 G/C=0.174 G= 6..0" G= 24.0" G= 49.0" G= 20.0" Y+R= 3.0" Y+R= 3.0" Y+R= 5.0" I Y+R= 5.0" OFF= 0.0% OFF= 7.8% 1 OFF=31.3% OFF=78.3% ------------ ------------------------------------- C=115 sec G= 99.0 sec = 86.1% Y=16.0 sec = 13.9% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Lane (Width/I g/C l Service Ratel Adj I HCM I L 190% Maxl ---Group-Lanes-- --- -- - -- Reqd Used @C(vph)@EVolume---v/c-I Delay ---S---Queue-- SB Approach 36.9 D+ -------------------------------- RT 1 12/1 0.341 0.426 ------------------------------------------ 1 436 1 599260 0.434 25.5 C+ 241 ft TH 24/2 0.445 0.426 1259 1508 1351 0.896 39.3 D+ 627 ft 1 LT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 12/1 0.000 0.052 1 168 1 211 1 13 0.062 14.9 B+ 25 ft NB Approach 21.3 C+ _________ 354 354 10.2 294 I LT+RTI 24/2 10.335 10.661 0.287 1 3521 1 3985 1 1802 10.480 0.814 1 43.5 1 D+1 462 ft ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WB Approach 269.6 F JLT+TH+RTI 24/2 10.351 10.174 1 1 1 544 1 817 11.472 1 269.6 1 F 1 545 ftl ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 00- ISS 11 Brickell Mainstreet MUSP 10/26/99 Future wo Project (2001) PM Peak 10:47:52 Existing Cycle Length and Optimized Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.001 - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # 4 - SE 7 St. & Brickell Ave... METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS SB WB NB EB GRADES 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 PEDLEVELS MODER MODER MODER MODER PARKINGSIDES NONE. NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 20 20 20 20 BUSVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 0 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS RT TH LT 22.9 1189 11 12.0 24.0 12.0 1 2 1 0.00 0.00.0.00 YES 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.8.8 0.88 0.88 3 3 3 NO NO YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 1406 3539 1770 Phasing Parameters RT TH LT 119 328 109 0.0 24.0 0.0 0 2 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0. 2.0 0.68 0.68 0.68 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3192 0 SEQUENCES 61 ALL PERMISSIVES YES NO NO NO OVERLAPS YES YES YES YES CYCLES 100 100 10 GREENTIMES 6.00 22.00 42.00 29.00 YELLOWTIMES 3.00 3.00 5.00 5.00 CRITICALS 0 0 0 0 EXCESS 0 RT TH LT 11 1341 .674 0.0 36.0 24.0 0 3 2 0.00 0.00 0:00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.84 0.84 0.84 3 3 3 NO. NO YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 5075 3433 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME RT TH LT 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.90 0.90 0.90 3 3 3 NO NO NO 4.0 ..4.0 4.0 5.0 ..5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1:00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 0 0 NONE NONE 0.00 1 0.0 0 Brickell Mainstreet MUSP 10/26/99 Future wo Project (2001) PM Peak 10:48:02 Existing Cycle Length and Optimized Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.001 - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 4 SE 7 St. & Brickell Ave. Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.81 Vehicle Delay 48.8 Level of Service D -=----------------------------------------------- Sq 61 Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 **/** ------------------------------------------------- + + + + ^ + + + + ++++ +> <+ + +> <++++ v ++++ v North <+ <+ + +> + +> + + + + + + + + + + + + ------------------------------------------------- G/C=0.052 G/C=0.191 G/C=0.365 G/C=0.252 G= 6.0" G= 22.0" G= 42.0" G= 29.0" Y+R= 3.0" Y+R= 3.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" OFF= 0.0% OFF= 7.8% l OFF=29.6% OFF=70.4% ------------------------------------------------- C=115 sec G= 99.0 sec = 86.1% Y=16.0 sec = 13.9% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ser ice • l LGroup JWidth/ Lanesl Reqdg/CUsed I @C (vph)R@Eate lVolumel v/c I Delay l S 190%,Maxl Quue ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- • SB Approach 66.9 E+ ---------------------------------------------------------------- RT 12/1 0.341 10.365 1 311 513 260 0.507 32.0 C 267 ft TH 24/2 0.445 0.365 935 1293 1351 1.045 74.1 E 693 ft LT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 12/1 0.000 10.052 I 147 191 13 0.067 18.7 B 25 ft NB Approach 26.5 C+ _________ 886 957 15.4 362 1 LT+RTI 24/2 10.335 10.583 0.270 l 2396 12925 1 1802 10.544 0.867 1 48.8 1 D 1 473 ft ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WB Approach 78.5 E JLT+TH+RTJ 24/2 10.351 10.252 1 242 1 805 1 817 11.015 1 78.5 1 E 1 494 ftl ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- r� L-A • 0 Brickell Mainstreet MUSP 10/26/99 Future wo Project (2001) PM Peak 08:46:23 Existing Cycle Length and Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC'[Ver 1.001 - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS GRADES PEDLEVELS PARKINGSIDES PARKVOLUMES BUSVOLUMES RIGHTTURNONREDS 5 - SW 8 St. & SW 2 Ave. SB WB NB EB 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 MODER MODER MODER MODER NONE NONE NONE NONE 20 20 20 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS RT TH LT 0 526 142 0.0 24.0 0.0 0 2 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.88 0.88 0.88 3 3 3 NO NO NO 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3196 0 Phasing Parameters RT TH LT 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.90 0.90 0.90 3 3 3 NO NO NO 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1..00 1.00 1.00 1:00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 0 0 SEQUENCES 21 ALL PERMISSIVES YES NO NO OVERLAPS YES YES YES CYCLES 60 60 10 GREENTIMES 5.00 32.00 32.00 YELLOWTIMES 3.00 4.00 4.00 CRITICALS 0 0 0 EXCESS 0 NO YES RT TH LT 20 439 0 0.0 24.0 0.0 0 2 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.91 0.91 0.91 3 3 3 NO NO NO 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3501 0 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME RT TH LT 118 856 124 0.0 36.0 0.0 0 3 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.96 0.96 0.96 3 3 3 NO NO NO 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 4814 0 NONE NONE 0.00 1 0.0 0 NMMw:1:-1 • Brickell Mainstreet MUSP Future wo Project (2001) PM Peak Existing Cycle Length and Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.001 - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 5 - SW 8 St. & SW 2 Ave. Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.51 Vehicle Delay 17.8 ------------------------------------- Sq 21 1 Phase 1 1 Phase 2 1 Phase 3 1 **/**------------------------------------- + + l ++ 1 ++ ++ + +> + +> v v ++> ++++> + + I ++++ + + v ------------------------------------- G/C=0.063 G/C=0.400 G/C=0.400 G= 5.0" G= 32.0" I G= 32.0" Y+R= 3.0" Y+R= 4.0" Y+R= 4.0" OFF= 0.0% OFF=10.0% OFF=55.0% ---=--------------------------------- C= 80 sec G= 69.0 sec = 86.3% Y=11.0 sec = 13.8% North 10/26/99 08:46:33 Level of Service B Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% ------------------------------------------------------------------------7------ Lane Width/I g/C Service Rate Adj lVolumel i HCM I L 190% Maxl l Group ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ILanes Reqd Used I @C (vph) @E v/c Delay S Queue • SB Approach 14.1 B+ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- JLT+TH 1 24/2 10.288 10.500 1 1543 1 1598 1 759 10.475 1 14.1 1 B+J 213 ftl ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NB Approach 17.5 B -------------------------- TH+RTJ 24/2 10.206 10.400 1 1301 1 1401 1 504 10.360 1 17.5 1 B , 170 ftl ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- EB Approach 20.2 C+ JLT+TH+RTJ 36/3 10.276 10.400 1 1831 1 1926 1 1144 10.594 1 20.2 1 C+J 257 ftl ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FIT -11,29M • • Brickell Mainstreet MUSP 10/26/99 Future wo Project (2001) PM Peak 08:47:04 Existing Cycle Length and Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.001 - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # 6 - SW 8 St. & SW 1 Ave. METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS SB WB NB EB GRADES 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 PEDLEVELS MODER MODER MODER MODER PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES .20 20 20 20 BUSVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 0 Movement Parameters MOVLA3ELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEAR.ANCES MINIMUMS IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS RT TH LT 0 286 137 0.0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.92 0.92 0.92 3 3 3 NO NO NO 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0.3539 1406 Phasing Parameters SEQUENCES 11 ALL PERMISSIVES NO NO OVERLAPS YES YES CYCLES 100 100 GREENTIMES 38.00 34.00 YELLOWTIMES 4.00 4.00 CRITICALS 0 0 EXCESS 0 RT TH LT 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.90 0.90 0.90 3 3 3 NO NO NO 4.0 4..0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 0 0 NO NO YES YES 10 RT TH LT 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.90 0.90 0.90 3 3 3 NO NO NO 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 0 0 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME RT TH LT 112 985 0 0.0 36.0 0.0 0 3 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.97 0.97 0.97 3 3 3 NO NO NO 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 4958 0 NONE NONE 0.00 1 0.0 0 00- 188 Brickell Mainstreet MUSP 10/26/99 Future wo Project (2001) PM Peak 08:47:14 Existing'Cycle Length and Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.001 - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 6 - SW 8 St. & SW 1 Ave. Degree.of Saturation (v/c) 0.44 Vehicle Delay 16.5 Level of Service B Sq 11 �--Phase 1 Phase 2 **/** ------------------------- + + I+ + /I\ + +> v North ++++> V --=---------------------- G/C=0.475 G/C=0.425 G= 38.0" G= 34.0" Y+R= 4.0" Y+R= 4.0" OFF= 0.0% OFF=52.5$ ------------------------- C= 80 sec G= 72.0 sec = 90.0% Y= 8.0 sec = 10.0% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% ----------------------------------------------------------------=-------------- Lane Width/ 1 I lVolumel HCM I 1 -Service)Rate--- I Group _-Lanesl Reqd Used -----g/C sed CSC (vph) @E v/c ------- --L--19QOU%eMueaxl Delay Delay S -- SB Approach 12.6 B+ -1 24/2 0.158 1592 618 1668 681 -1 B+ 92 ft 10.475 LT 12/1 10.204 0.475 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 , 149 0.223 I 13.1 ` B+112.3 88 fti EB Approach 18.1 B ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TH+RTJ 36/3 10.267 10.425 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2029 1 2107 1 1130 10.536 1 18.1 1 B 1 244 ftl • 00- 188 • • • Brickell Mainstreet MUSP 10/26/99 Future wo project (2001) PM Peak 10:45:50 Existing Cycle Length and Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.001 - Summary of Parameter.Values, Intersection Parameters -for Int # METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS GRADES PEDLEVELS PARKINGSIDES PARKVOLUMES BUSVOLUMES RIGHTTURNONREDS 7 - S 8 St. & S Miami Ave. SB WB NB EB 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 MODER MODER MODER MODER NONE NONE NONE NONE 20 20 20 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS RT TH LT 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00-0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.90 0.90 0:90 3 3 3 NO NO NO 4.0' 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 0 . 0 Phasing Parameters SEQUENCES 11 ALL PERMISSIVES NO NO OVERLAPS YES YES CYCLES 100 100 GREENTIMES 44.00 28.00 YELLOWTIMES 4.00 4.00 CRITICALS 0 0 EXCESS 0 3 RT TH LT 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.90 0.90 0.90 3 3 3 NO NO NO 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 0 0 NO NO YES YES 10 RT TH LT 45 617 0 0.0 24.0 0.0 0 2 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.91 0.91 0.90 3 3 3 NO NO NO 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3481 0 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME RT TH LT 0 911 223 0.0 36.0 0.0 0 3 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.90 0.93 0.93 3 3 3 NO NO NO 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 4840 0 NONE NONE 0.00 1 0.0 0 00` 188 Brickell Mainstreet MUSP 10/26/99 Future wo project (2001) PM Peak 10:45:59 Existing Cycle Length and Phasing SIGNAL971TEAPAC[Ver 1.001 - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 7 - S 8 St. & S Miami Ave. Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.59 Vehicle Delay 19.9 Level of Service B ------------------------- Sq 11 Phase 1 Phase 2 **/** ------------------------- North + +> ++++> + + ------------------------- G/C=0.550 i G/C=0.350 G= 44.0" G= 28.0" Y+R= 4.0" Y+R= 4.0" OFF= 0.0% OFF=60.0 ------------------------- C= 80 sec G= 72.0 sec = 90.0% Y= 8.0 sec = 10.0% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Lane g/C Service Rate Ad' HCM I L 190% Maxi --Group---Lanes--Reqd---Used-I (Width/I CSC-(vph)-CSEv/c- l--Volumel--- I Delay---S---Queue-- • NB Approach 10.8 B+ TH+RTI 24/2 10.261 10.550 1 1886 1 1914 1 727 10.380 1 10.8 1 B+J 184 ftl ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- EB Approach 25.3 C+ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- JLT+TH 1 36/3 10.288 10.350 1 1566 1 1694 1 1220 10.720 1 25.3 1 C+J 297 ftl ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 00" 188 DESCRIPTION 0 .. ART -PLAN 3.1 Arterial Level of Service Estimating Software Based on Chapter 11 of the 1997 Highway Capacity Manual Update Florida Department of Transportation Road Name From To Peak Direction Off -Peak Direction Study Time Period Analysis Date User Notes Brickell Ave. SE 13 St. SE 7 St. Northbound Southbound PM—wlopbw 13-oct-99 I Future (2001) w/ 0 Class 1 TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS 55, 50, 45, 40 or 35 AADT 20,00( (U or T) K Factor 0.094 Class 2 D Factor 0.853 45,40 or 35 Peak Hour Factor 0.863 • Adj. Saturation Flow Rate 1,900 % Tums from Exclusive Lanes 21 Class 4 (U only) ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS # Through Lanes Peak Direction 2 # Through Lanes Off -Peak Direction 2 Urbanized, Transitioning/Urban, or Rural U Arterial Class 3 Free Flow Soeed (mph) 35 0 Class 1 (R) 55, 50, 45, 40 or 35 Class 1 (U or T) 55, 50, or 45 Class 2 (U or T) 45,40 or 35 Class 3 (U or T) 40, 35, or 30 Class 4 (U only) 35, 30 or 25 SIGNALIZATION CHARACTERISTICS Arrival Type Peak Direction 4 (1,2,3,415,6) Arrival Type Off -Peak Direction 4 Type Signal System S PaPretinedA•AcwaW,S-sentlacwated System Cycle Length 100 Weighted Through Movement g/C 0.49 • • • Northbound PEAK DIRECTION SPECIFIC INPUTS Brickell Ave. Peak Hour Volume Segment AADI Peak Hour (Enter 1 if Volume unavailable, .(Maybe over- 0 if segment written if direct Segment is unused) measure avail-) % Tums from Exclusive Number Lanes of Lanes Cycle Length at Signals 2-10 Effective . g/C at Signals 2-10 Distance between Signals (Enter in Miles or Feet) Segment Length Arrival (FT) Type 1-2 1 1,341 10.4 2 115 0.421 1600.00 1,600 300 3 2-3 1 2,079 32.4 3 115 0.58 300.00 3 3-4 0' 4-5 0 5-6 0 SE 8 St SE 13 St 6-7 0 14.1 D 7-8 0 3 8-9 0 9-10 1 0 Southbound PEAK DIRECTION RESULTS Segment Peak Hour Volume Northbound Brickell Ave. Segment From To Through Movement Flow Rate v/c Ratio Control Delay Intersection Approach LOS Speed (MPH) Arterial Segment LOS 1-2 2-3 3-4 4-5 5-6 6-7 7-8 8-9 9-10 SE 13 St SE 8 St 1392 1629 0.88 0.49 35.9 14.2 D B 15.3 9.7 D F SE 8 St SE 7 St SE 7 St SE 8 St SE 8 St SE 13 St Section Length: Arterial Speed: 0.3598 Miles LOS: 14.1 D mph 3 Southbound OFF-PEAK DIRECTION'S SPECIFIC INPUTS Segment Peak Hour Volume % Tums from Exclusive Number Lanes of Lanes Cycle Length at Signals 9-1 Effective g/C at Signals 9-1 Segment Length Arrival (FT) Type 10-9 9-8 8-7 7-6 6-5 5-4 4-3 3-2 2-1 Arterial Segment LOS 10-9 9-8 8-7 7-6 6-5 5-4 4-3 3-2 2-1 300 1,600 0.45 0.86 18.1 36.8 B D 8.3 14.8 F D SE 7 St SE 8 St SE 8 St SE 13 St 1,3071 13.1 .3 1151 0.511 3 1,9631 41.2 2 1151 0.411 3 f OFF-PEAK DIRECTION RESULTS Southbound Brickell Ave. Segment From To Through Movement Flow Rate v/c Ratio Control Delay Intersection Approach LOS Speed (MPH) Arterial Segment LOS 10-9 9-8 8-7 7-6 6-5 5-4 4-3 3-2 2-1 1,316 1 1,337 0.45 0.86 18.1 36.8 B D 8.3 14.8 F D SE 7 St SE 8 St SE 8 St SE 13 St Section Length: 0.3598 miles Arterial Speed = LOS = 13.1 E mph f • • • Brickell Mainstreet MUSP 10/26/99 Future wo Project (2001) PM Peak 10:46:28 Existing Cycle Length and Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.001 - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION.PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION . 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS GRADES PEDLEVELS PARKINGSIDES PARKVOLUMES BUSVOLUMES RIGHTTURNONREDS 8 - SE 8 St. & Brickell Ave. SB WB NB EB 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 MODER MODER MODER MODER NONE NONE NONE NONE 20 20 20 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS RT TH LT VOLUMES 0 10.97 171 WIDTHS 0.0 36.0 24.0 LANES 0 3 2 UTILIZATIONS 0.00 0.00 0.00 TRUCKPERCENTS 2.0 2.0 2.0 PEAKHOURFACTORS 0.87 0.87 0.87 ARRIVALTYPES 3 3 3 ACTUATIONS NO NO YES REQCLEARANCES 4.0 4.0 4.0 MINIMUMS 5:0 5.0 5.0 IDEALSATFLOWS 1900 1900 1900 FACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 DELAYFACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 NSTOPFACTORS 1.00 1.00 1.00 GROUPTYPES NORM NORM NORM SATURATIONFLOWS 0 5085 3433 Phasing Parameters RT TH LT 542 320 0 12.0 24.0 0.0 1 2 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.96 0.96 0.96 . 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 DOPT NORM NORM 1406 3130 0 SEQUENCES 27 27 PERMISSIVES NO NO NO NO OVERLAPS YES NO YES YES CYCLES 115 115 10 GREENTIMES 8.00 55.00 24.00 10.00 YELLOWTIMES 3.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 CRITICALS 3 8 11 4 EXCESS 0 RT TH LT 139 1202 0 12.0 24.0 0.0 1 2 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.88 0.88 0.88 3 3 3 NO NO YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 1406 3539 0 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME RT TH LT 318 296 314 0.0 24.0 24.0 0 2 2 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.92 0.92 0.92 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3090 3433 NONE LAG 0.00 1 0.0 0 0®- -188 Brickell Mainstreet MUSP 10/26/99 Future wo Project (2001) PM Peak 10:46:38 Existing Cycle Length and Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.001 - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 8 -.SE 8 St. & Brickell Ave. Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.97 Vehicle Delay 149.1 Level of.Serv.ice F ------------------------------------------------- Sq 27 Phase 1 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 1 Phase 4 1 **/LG ---------------------=--------------------------.- + * + 1 /I\ + *> + <++++ v v North 1 Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Lane g/C Service Rate Adj HCM L . C+ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (Width/I LanesReqd Used I @C (vph) @E iVolumei 10.574 1 v/c Delay I I S 190%MaxlGroup Queue 0.43214.3 * .+ v 289 ------------------------------------------------- G/C=0.070 LT 1 24/2 10.244 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I G/C=0.478 G/C=0.209.1 G/C=0.087 G= 8.0" I G= 55.0" I G= 24.0" I G= 10.0". Y+R= 3.0" Y+R=.5.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" OFF= 0.0% 1 OFF= 9.6% 1 OFF=61.7$ I OFF=87.0% ------------------------------------------------- C=115 sec G= 97.0 sec = 84.3% Y=18.0 sec = 15.7% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Lane g/C Service Rate Adj HCM L . C+ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (Width/I LanesReqd Used I @C (vph) @E iVolumei 10.574 1 v/c Delay I I S 190%MaxlGroup Queue C, SB Approach 22.3 . C+ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TH 36/3 10.348 10.574 1 2839 1 2919 1 1261 0.43214.3 289 ftI LT 1 24/2 10.244 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10.070 1 1 1 208 1 197 10.824 1 73.2 JB+J*E 148 ft NB Approach 28.6 C RT 1 12/1 0.294 10.478 1 538 672 158 0.23518.5 B 133 ft i TH 1 24/2 10.448 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10.478 1 1513 l 1693 1 1366 10.807 1 29.7 1*C 1 576 ftl WB Approach 644.5 F ------------ RT 1 12/1+10.320 10.087 1 1 1 97 1' 268 2.197 616.9 396 ftl TH 1 24/2-10.316 ---------------------------------------------------=--------------------------- 10.087 1 1 1 242 1 630 12.316 656.2 1 J*F 1 F 465 ft EB Approach 73.6 E +RT1 4/2 10.326 10.209 1 124/2 i I LT 10.262 ------------------------------------------------------------=------------------ 10.209 1 1 1 716 1 341 10.476 1 40.5 J*F+J D 218 ft 0®- 188 • • • Brickell Mainstreet MUSP 10/26/99 Future wo Project (2001) PM Peak 10:47:15 Existing Cycle Length w/ Mitigations SIGNAL97-/TEAPAC[Ver 1.001 - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS GRADES PEDLEVELS PARKINGSIDES PARKVOLUMES BUSVOLUMES RIGHTTURNONREDS 8 - SE 8 St. & Brickell Ave. SB WB NB EB 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 MODER MODER MODER MODER NONE NONE NONE NONE 20 20 20 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS RT TH LT 0 1097 171 0.0 36.0 24.0 0 3 2 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.87 0.87 0.87 3 3 3 NO NO YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM . 0 5085 3433 Phasing Parameters RT TH LT 542 0 320 24.0 0.0 12.0 2 0 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.96 0.96 0.96 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 2474 0 177.0 SEQUENCES 27 ALL PERMISSIVES NO NO NO NO OVERLAPS YES YES YES YES CYCLES 115 115 10 GREENTIMES 6.00 48.00 21.00 20.00 YELLOWTIMES 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 CRITICALS 3 9 11 5 EXCESS 0 RT TH IT 139 1202 0 12.0 24.0 0.0 1 2 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.88 0.88 0.88 3 3 3 NO NO YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 1406 3539 0 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME RT TH IT 318 296 314 12.0 24.0 12.0 1 2 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.92 0.92 0.92 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 DOPT NORM DOPT 1406 3182 1406 NONE LAG 0.00 1 0.0 0 113, MEM16,0 Brickell Mainstreet MUSP 10/26/99 Future wo Project (2001) PM Peak 10:47:23 • Existing Cycle Length w/ Mitigations SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.001 - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 8 - SE 8 St. & Brickell Ave. Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.80 Vehicle Delay 53.1 Level of Service D -------------------------------------------------- Sq 27 Phase 1 1 Phase 2 1 Phase 3 Phase 4 1 **/LG ------------------------------------------------- + * + + * ++++ + ++++ /I\ + *> + v v ++++ North ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ane idth/ Serice r I LGroup I'WLanesl Regdg/CUsed I @C (vph)R@EeIvolumel v/c I Delay I S 190%Max Queue ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SB Approach 36.7 D+ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TH 36/3 609 331 ft LT l 24/2 10.346 0.244 10.513 0.052 12461 l 2148 l 1197 10.483 1.101 l 151.2 J*B F l 151 ftl ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NB Approach 41.0 D+ RT 12/1 0.294 I10.417 10.269 149 1 TH 24/2 10.448 0.417 11215 1 1477 1 1366 0.925 1 43.0 D+1 643 ft ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WB Approach 76.6 E ____________ RT 24/2 667 49.7 334 1 LT l 12/1 10.337 0.315 10.270 0.174 271 l 286 I 333 10.847 1.081 l 122.1 I F 1445 ft I ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- EB Approach 74.3 E RT 12/1+10.305 10.183 1 235 237 0.922 82.2 F 313 ft TH 24/2- 0.301 0.183 1. 572 558 0.960 74.2 *E 369 ft LT 12/1+ 0.294 0.183 1 235 214 0.833 65.6 E+ 283 ft ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ++++ v + + v ------------------------------------------------- G/C=0.052 G/C=0.417 G/C=0.183 G/C=0.174 G= 6.0" G= 48.0" G= 21.0" G= 20.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" OFF= 0.0% OFF= 9.6% 1 OFF=55.7% OFF=78.3% ------------------------------------------------- C=115 sec G= 95.0 sec = 82.6% Y=20.0 sec = 17.4% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ane idth/ Serice r I LGroup I'WLanesl Regdg/CUsed I @C (vph)R@EeIvolumel v/c I Delay I S 190%Max Queue ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SB Approach 36.7 D+ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TH 36/3 609 331 ft LT l 24/2 10.346 0.244 10.513 0.052 12461 l 2148 l 1197 10.483 1.101 l 151.2 J*B F l 151 ftl ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NB Approach 41.0 D+ RT 12/1 0.294 I10.417 10.269 149 1 TH 24/2 10.448 0.417 11215 1 1477 1 1366 0.925 1 43.0 D+1 643 ft ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WB Approach 76.6 E ____________ RT 24/2 667 49.7 334 1 LT l 12/1 10.337 0.315 10.270 0.174 271 l 286 I 333 10.847 1.081 l 122.1 I F 1445 ft I ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- EB Approach 74.3 E RT 12/1+10.305 10.183 1 235 237 0.922 82.2 F 313 ft TH 24/2- 0.301 0.183 1. 572 558 0.960 74.2 *E 369 ft LT 12/1+ 0.294 0.183 1 235 214 0.833 65.6 E+ 283 ft ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- • • • Brickell Mainstreet MUSP 10/26/99 Future wo Project (2001) PM.Peak 08:50:36 Existing Cycle Length and Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.001 - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS GRADES PEDLEVELS PARKINGSIDES PARKVOLUMES BUSVOLUMES RIGHTTURNONREDS 9 - SW 13 St. & SW 2 Ave. SB WB NB EB 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 MODER MODER MODER MODER NONE NONE NONE NONE 20 20 20 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS RT TH LT 272 173 145 12.0 12.0 0.0 1 1 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.85 0.85 0.85 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 1406 1385 0 Phasing Parameters SEQUENCES 11 ALL PERMISSIVES NO NO OVERLAPS YES YES CYCLES 100 100 GREENTIMES 22.00 30.00 YELLOWTIMES 4.00 4.00' CRITICALS 0 0 EXCESS 0 RT TH LT 160 1268 15 0.0 24.0 0.0 0 2 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.82 0.82 0.82 3 3 3 NO NO NO 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3264 0 NO NO YES YES 10 RT TH LT 20 83 118 0.0 12.0 0.0 0 1 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.86 0.86 0.86 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 857 0 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME RT TH LT 5 439 68 0.0 24.0 0.0 0 2 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.95 0.95 0.95 3 3 3 NO NO NO 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 2046 0 NONE NONE 0.00 1 0.0 0 I M0 Brickell Mainstreet MUSP 10/26/99 Future wo Project (2001) PM Peak 08:50:46 Existing Cycle Length and Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.001 - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection.Averages for Int # 9 - SW 13 St. & SW 2 Ave. Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.88 Vehicle Delay 42.2 Level of Service D+ ------------------------- Sq 11 1 Phase 1 1 Phase 2 1 **/** ------------------------- / \ <+ + +> <++++I v ++++ North 1 ++++ v <+ + +> ++++> + + + v ------------------------- G/C=0.367 G/C=0.500 G= 22.0" G= 30.0" Y+R= 4.0" Y+R= 4.0" OFF= 0.0% OFF=43.3% ------------------------- C= 60 sec G= 52.0 sec = 86.7% Y= 8.0 sec = 13.3% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Lane g/C Service Ratel Adj HCM L Maxl Group ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- IIWidth/ Lanes Regd Used I @C (vph) @E Volume v/c I I Delay I S 1.90% Queue • SB Approach 20.2 C+ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- RT 12/1 0.367 1 459 1 516 1 320 0.620 17.9 B 171 ft ILT +TH 1 12/1 10.273 0.315 10.367 1 451.1 508 1 375 10.738 1 22.1 1 C+1 200 ft1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NB Approach 32.8 C ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1LT+TH+RT1 12/1 10.360 10.367 1 263 1 314 1 257 10.818 1 32.8 I C 1 137 ft1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WB Approach 61.5 E+. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1LT+TH+RT1 24/2 10.539 10.500 1 1617 1 1632 1 1759 11.078 1 61.5 1 E+1 371 ft1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- EB Approach 12.1 B+ 1LT+TH+RT1 24/2 10.303 10.500 1 986 1 1023 1 539 10.527 1 12.1 1 B+1 114 ft1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- • 11 Brickell Mainstreet MUSP 10/26/99 Future wo Project (2001) PM Peak 08:51:08 Existing Cycle Length and Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.001 - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # 10 - SW 13 St. & SW 1 Ave. METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS SB WB NB EB GRADES 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 PEDLEVELS MODER MODER MODER MODER PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 20 20 20 20 BUSVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 0 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS . RT TH LT 245 110 46 12.0 12.0 12.0 1 1 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.87 0.87 0.87 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 1406 1863 1770 Phasing Parameters SEQUENCES 11 ALL PERMISSIVES NO NO OVERLAPS YES YES CYCLES 60 60 GREENTIMES 19.00 33.00 YELLOWTIMES 4.00 4.00 CRITICALS 0 0 EXCESS 0 RT TH LT 0 1190 6 0.0 24.0 0.0 0 2 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.80 0.80 0.80 3 3 3 NO NO NO 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3371 0 NO NO YES YES 10 RT TH LT 12 0 36 0.0 12.0 0.0 0 1 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.60 0.60 0.60 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 1263 0 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME RT TH LT 23 561 0 0.0 24.0 0.0 0 2 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.90 0.90 0.90 3 3 3 NO NO NO 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00.1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3504 0 NONE NONE 0.00 1 0.0 0 00- 188 Brickell Mainstreet MUSP 10/26/99 Future wo Project (2001) PM Peak 08:51:17 Existing Cycle Length and Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 10 - SW 13,St. & SW 1 Ave. Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.61 Vehicle Delay 13.7 Level of Service B+ ------------------------- Sq 11 Phase 1 Phase 2 **/**------------------------- +.+ + <+ + +> <++++ v ++++ v North <+ +> ++++> + + v ------------------------- G/C=0.317 G/C=0.550 G= 19.0" G= 33.0" Y+R= 4.0" Y+R= 4.0" OFF= 0.0% OFF=38.3% ------------------------- C= 60 sec G= 52.0 sec = 86.7% Y= 8.0 sec = 13.3% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 Lane Width/ g/C Service Rate Ad' HCM L 90% Max Group I Lanesl Reqd Used I @C (vph) @E 1Volumel v/c I.Delay I S I Queue 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SB Approach 18.3 B ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- RT 12/1 0.247 384 445 282 0.634 20.5 C+ 163 ft TH 12/1 0.101 10.317 0.3.17 525 590 126 0.214 15.2 B 73 ft LT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 12/1 0.053 10.317 496 560 53 0.095 14.5 B+ 31 ft NB Approach 12.3 B+ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- JLT+TH+RTJ 12/1 10.102 10.383 1 429 1 484 1 80 10.165 1 12..3. B+J 42 ftl ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WB Approach 14.8 B+ ILT+TH 1 24/2-10.452 10.550 ' 1854 1 1854 1 1494 10.806 1 14.8 1 B+J 283 ft) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- EB Approach 7.9 A TH+RT1 24/2 10.215 0.550 1927 1 1927 1 649 10.337 1 7.9 1 A 1 123 ftl ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- • • • Brickell Mainstree.t MUSP Future wo Project (2001) PM Peak Existing Cycle Length and Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC(Ver 1.001 - Suumnary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # 11 - S 13 St. & S Miami Ave. METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0. Approach Parameters APPLABELS GRADES PEDLEVELS PARKINGSIDES PARKVOLUMES BUSVOLUMES RIGHTTURNONREDS 10/26/99 10:48:35 SB WB NB EB 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 MODER MODER MODER MODER NONE NONE NONE NONE 20 20 20 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS RT TH LT 139 139 12 0.0 24.0 0.0 0 2 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.76 0.76 0.76 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 2929 0 Phasing Parameters RT TH LT 88 1078 41 0.0 24.0 0.0 0 2 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.82 0.82 0.82 3 3 3 NO NO NO 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3155 0 RT TH LT 36 104 76 0.0 24.0 0.0 0 2 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.94 0.94 0.94 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 2487 0 RT TH LT 45 492 74 0.0 24.0 0.0 0 2 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.88 0.88 0.88 3 3 3 NO NO NO 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 2135 0 SEQUENCES 11 ALL PERMISSIVES NO NO NO NO LEADLAGS NONE NONE OVERLAPS YES YES YES YES OFFSET 0.00 1 CYCLES 60 60 10 PEDTIME 0.0 0 GREENTIMES 18.00 32.00 YELLOWTIMES 5.00 5.00 CRITICALS 0 0 EXCESS 0 IR MIMMEW- • Brickell Mainstreet MUSP 10/26/99 Future wo Project (2001) PM Peak 10:48:44 Existing Cycle Length and Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.001 - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 11 - S 13 St. & S Miami Ave. Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.70 Vehicle Delay 16.8 Level of Service B Sq 11 North ----------------- Phase 1 1 Phase 2 j ------------------------- < . ------------------------<+ + +> <++++ v ++++ ++++ v <+ + +> ++++> + + + v ------------------------- G/C=0.300 G/C=0.533 G= 18.0" G= '32.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" J OFF= 0.0% OFF=38.3% ------------------------- C= 60 sec G= 50.0 sec = 83.3% Y=10.0 sec = 16.7% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% -- ---- Lane width/ g/C Service Rate Adj HCM L Group Lanesl Reqd Used I @C (vph) @E IVolumel v/c I Delay I S J90%MaxJ Queue ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SB Approach 17.2 B ILT+TH+RTI 24/2 10.160 10.300 1 809 1 879 1 382 10.435 1 17.2 1 B 1 113 ftj ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NB Approach 16.4 B ILT+TH+RTI 24/2 10.124 10.300 1 677 1 746 1 230 10.308 1 16.4 1 B 1 68 ftl ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WB Approach 18.9 B ILT+TH+RTI 24/2 10.475 10.533 1 1677 1 1683 1 1472 10.875 ( 18.9 ( B 1 290 ftl ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- EB Approach 12.1 B+ ILT+TH+RTI 24/2 10.358 10.533 1 1110 1 1138 694 10.610 1 12.1 1 B+J 137 ftl ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- • • Brickell Mainstreet MUSP 10/26/99 Future wo.Project (2001) PM Peak 10:49:08 Existing Cycle Length and Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.001 - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # 12 - SE 13 St. & Brickell Ave.. METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 .0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS SB WB NB EB GRADES 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 PEDLEVELS MODER MODER MODER MODER PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 20 20 20 20 BUSVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 0 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS RT TH LT 763 1145 44 12.0 24.0 12.0 1 2 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.89 0.89 0.89 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 1406 3539 693 Phasing Parameters RT TH LT 73 300 136 12.0 12.0 12.0 1 1 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.89 0.89 0.89 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 1406 1863 1770 SEQUENCES 17 ALL PERMISSIVES NO NO NO OVERLAPS NO YES YES CYCLES 100 100 10 GREENTIMES 69.00 15.00 16.00 YELLOWTIMES 5.00 5.00 5.00 CRITICALS 0 0 0 EXCESS 0 NO YES RT TH LT 42 574 132 0.0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.95 0.95 0.95 3 3 3 NO NO YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00-1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3480 268 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME RT TH LT 110 120 246 12.0 12.0 12.0 1 1 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.92 0.92 0.92 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM DOPT 1406 1830 1770 NONE LAG 0.00 1 0.0 0 0 • Brickell Mainstreet MUSP 10/26/99 Future wo Project (2001).PM Peak 10:49:18 Existing Cycle Length and Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPACIVer 1.001 - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 12 - SE 13 St. & Brickell Ave.. Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.73 Vehicle Delay 49.8 Level of Service D ------------------------------------- Sq 17 1 Phase 1 1 Phase 2 1 Phase 3 **/LG ------------------------------------- v ++++ North ++++ v <+ + +> ++++> + + + v ------------=------------------------ G/C=0.600 G/C=0.130G/C=0.139 G= 69.0" G= 15.0". G= 16.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" OFF= 0.0% OFF=64.3% OFF=81.7% ------------------------------------- C=115 sec G=100.0 sec = 87.0% Y=15.0 sec = 13.0% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Lane g/C Service Rate Adj HCM L 190%Max1Group ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (Width/1 Lanes Reqd Used 1 @C (vph) @E lVolumel v/c Delay I 1 S Queue SB Approach 144.4 31.6 C ------------------------------------------------------------------ RT 1 12/1 0.650 10.600 774 844 857 46.7 57.9 - ------ E+ 554 ft 1 TH 24/2 0.425 0.309 2059. 2124 1287 11.015 0.606 15.0 B+ 416 ft LT. 12/1 -------------------------------=----------------------------------------------- 0.257 10.600 0.600 357 416 49 10.118 10.0 B+ 32 ft NB Approach 19.2 B 1. TH+RTI 24/2 10.657 0.319 10.600 1 2017 1 2088 1 648 10.310 1 11.7 1 B+1 209 ft1 LT 12/1 0.600 122 155 139 0.863 54.4 D 90 ft ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WB Approach 144.4 F RT 12/1 0.247 0.139 1 171 82 0.418 46.7 D 114 ft TH 12/1 0.309 0.139 1 234 337 1.301 210.3 F 469 ft I LT 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 12/1 0.259 0.139 1 221 153 0.622 51.5 D 213 ft EB Approach 68.6 E ------------------------------------------------------------------- RT 12/1 10.260 0.130 1 157 120 0.656 55.8 E+ 169 ft LT 12/1+10.270 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0.130 1 205 193 0.835 71.3 E 271 ft • • r� L Brickell Mainstreet MUSP 10/26/99 Future wo Proj.ect (2001) PM Peak 10:49:48 Existing Cycle Length w Mitigations SIGNAL.97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.001 - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # 12 - SE 13 St. & Brickell Ave.. METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION. 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS . SB WB NB EB GRADES 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 PEDLEVELS MODER MODER MODER MODER PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 20 20 20 20 BUSVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 0 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS RT TH LT 763 1145 44 12.0 24.0 12.0 1 2 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 .2.0 2.0 0.89 0.89 0.89 3 3 3 YES YES. YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 1406 3539 756 Phasing Parameters RT TH IT 73 300 136 0.0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.89 0.89 0.89 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3369 1770 SEQUENCES 37 ALL PERMISSIVES NO NO YES NO OVERLAPS YES YES YES YES CYCLES 115 115 10 GREENTIMES 10.00 47.00 19.00 19.00 YELLOWTIMES 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 CRITICALS 0 0 0 0 EXCESS 0 RT TH LT 42 574 132 0.0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.95 0.95 0.95 3 3 3 NO NO YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3480 1770 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME RT TH LT 110 120 246 12.0 12.0 12.0 1 1 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.92 0.92 0.92 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM DOPT 1406 1830 1770 NONE LAG 0.00 1 0.0 0 00 188 ! r Service Brickell Mainstreet MUSP Adj 10/26/99 Future wo Project (2001) PM Peak Maxl 10:49:57 Existing Cycle Length w Mitigations @C (vph) @E Volume I v/c Delay I I S SIGNAL97/TEAPAC(Ver 1.001 - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 12 -. SE. 13 St. & Brickell Ave.. Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.75 Vehicle Delay 39.6 Level of Service D+. Sq 37 1 Phase 1 1 Phase 2 1 Phase 3 1 Phase 4 . **/LG ------------------------------------------------- 1 139 0.635 1 28.4 + + + + ft l WB Approach + + + ++++ 49.9 D /•\ +RT1 <+ + +> <+ <++++ ____________ v 1 .++++ 10.259 10.165 1 269 153 10.524 1 ++++ v 1.206 ft North <+ + +> <+ + +> ++++> 49.6 +++ +++ ++++ RT 12/1 0.260 0.165 1 + + + + + + v 45.8 D 162 --------------------------=---------------------- G/C=0.087 G/C=0.409 G/C=0.16.5 G/C=0.165 1 280 204 G= 10.0" G= 47.0" G= 19.0" G= 19.0". ft LT ---------12/1+-0_270--0_16.5------1- Y+R= 5.0" Y+R=.5.0" Y+R= 5.0" , Y+R= 5.0" 1 -- ------------- D OFF= 0.0% OFF=13.0% I OFF=58.3% OFF=79.1`k ------------------------------------------------- C=115 sec G= 95.0 sec = 82.6% Y=20.0 sec = 17.4% Ped= O.O sec = 0.0% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Lane g/C Service Rated Adj HCM L Maxl Group ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (Width/I Lanes Reqd Used I @C (vph) @E Volume I v/c Delay I I S 190% Queue SB Approach 42.4 D+ RT 12/1 10.650 10.617 1 803 1 868 1 857 10.98748.9 D 530 ft TH 24/2 0.425 1210 1446 1287. 0.890 38.9 D+ 615 ft LT 12/1 -----------------------------------=------------------------------------------- 10.409 10.253 0.409 1 217 I 304 49 0.159 21.7 C+ 47 ft NB Approach 17.8 B 24/2 0.319 0.539 112/1 757 8761156 1209 15.5 B 241 I LT+RTI 10.073 ----------------------=-------------------------------------------=------------ 10.087 1 1 139 0.635 1 28.4 C 1 104 ft l WB Approach 49.9 D +RT1 ____________ 1 I LT 12/1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10.259 10.165 1 269 153 10.524 1 45.6 1 D 1.206 ft EB Approach 49.6 D RT 12/1 0.260 0.165 1 208 120 . 10.517 45.8 D 162 ft TH 12/1- 0.270 0.165 1 280 204 0.675 51.0 D 275 ft LT ---------12/1+-0_270--0_16.5------1- --269----193--10.661 1 -- ------------- D 260 ft • • • HCS: Unsignalize®Intersections Release 2. SW9&SW1.HC0 Page 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: '(904) 392-0378 Streets: (N -S) SW 1ST AVENUE (E -W) SW 9TH STREET Major Street Direction.... NS Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) Analyst ................... HAN Date of Analysis.......... 10/7/99 Other Information ......... BRICKELL MAINSTREET MUSP-W/O PROJECT Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection NorthboundSouthbound Eastbound Westbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes Stop/Yield Volumes PHF Grade MCIs M SU/RV' s ( o ) CV's W PCE Is ------------ 0 0 0 Maneuver --------------- Time (tf) ------------------------------------------------------------------ Left Turn Major.Road N 0 2 0 N 348 .883 0 ---------------- Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) ------------------------------------------------------------------ Left Turn Major.Road 5.50 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.50 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 7.00 3.40 00— 188 Eli • HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1g SW9&SW1.HC0 Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection Step 4: LT from Minor Street WB EB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 394 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 593 Major LT,' Minor TH Total Queue Impedance Factor: Cap Cap 1.00 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 1.00 Capacity Adjustment Factor -------- ------ WB L 201 due to Impeding Movements 1.00 Movement Capacity: -------------------------------------------------------- (pcph) 593 Intersection Delay = 2.5 sec/veh Approach Delay (sec/veh) 9.2 Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph) (sec/veh) (veh) -------- ------ WB L 201 ------ ------ 593 ------- 9.2 ------- ----- 1.7 B Intersection Delay = 2.5 sec/veh Approach Delay (sec/veh) 9.2 • • 11 HCS:0UnsignalizemIntersectioh§ Release 2 MIAMI&S9.HC0 Page 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 -------------------- Streets: (N -S) S. MIAMI AVENUE (E -W) S 9TH STREET Major Street Direction.... NS Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) Analyst ................... HAN Date of Analysis.... 10/7/99 Other Information ......... BRICKELL MAINSTREET MUSP-W/O PROJECT Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection ------------------------------------ NorthboundSouthbound. Eastbound Westbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes Stop/Yield Volumes PHF Grade MCIs W SU/RV's (%) CV's M PCE Is ------------ 0 > 2 < 0 . N 0 406 0 .841 .841 .841 0 1.10 --------------- 0 0 0 Maneuver ---------------- Time (tf) ------------------------------------------------------------------ Left Turn Major Road N Adjustment Factors 0 1 < 0 118 100 .863 .863 0 1.10 1.10 --------------- Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) ------------------------------------------------------------------ Left Turn Major Road 5.50 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.50 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 7.00 3.40 00- 188 Intersection Delay = LJ 2.9 sec/veh 00— 188 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1g MIAMI&S9.HC0 Page 2 for TWSC Intersection -----------Worksheet ------- ---- ----- --------------------------- Step 1: RT from Minor Street WB EB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows:. (vph) 242 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1044 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1044 Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0.88 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 2: LT from Major Street SB NB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 0 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1714 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1714 Prob. of Queue-Free State: 1.00 TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 3400 RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 Major LT Shared Lane Prob. of Queue-Free State: 1.00 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 3: TH from Minor Street WB EB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 483 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 569 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1.00 569 Prob. of.Queue-Free,State: -------------------------------------------------------- 0.73 Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 950 Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) .(pcph) (pcph)(sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh) -------- ------ ------ ------------- WB T 151 569 > ------- -------------- 8.2 WB R 128 1044 > 719 8.2 2.1 B NB L 0 1714 2.1 0.0 A 0.0 Intersection Delay = LJ 2.9 sec/veh 00— 188 • • HCS: UnsignalizeT Intersections Release 2* SE1&SE9.HC0 Page 1 ------------------------------- Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 Streets: (N -S) SE 1ST AVENUE (E -W) SE 9TH STREET Major Street Direction.... NS Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) Analyst. HAN Date of Analysis.......... 10/7/99 Other Information ......... BRICKELL MAINSTREET MUSP-W/O PROJECT Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection --------------------- NorthboundSouthbound Eastbound Westbound L T R L. T R L T R L T R No. Lanes Stop/Yield Volumes PHF Grade MC's M SU/RV's (%) CV's M PGE's ------------ 0 > 1 0 N 18 56 .83 .83 0 1.10 --------------- 0 1 < 0 N 147 157 .815 .815 0 ---------------- 0 > 0 < 0 0 4 1 1 0 1.10 1.10 ---------------- Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) ------------------------------------------------------------------ Left Turn Major Road 5.00 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.00 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 6.50 3.40 0 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1g SE1&SE9.HC0 Page 2 for TWSC Intersection ---------_-Worksheet ------------------------------------ Step 1: RT from.Minor Street WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 276 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1003 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1003 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 1.00 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 2: LT from Major Street SB NB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 373 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1139 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1139 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.98 TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) Major LT Shared Lane Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.98 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 4: LT from Minor Street WB EB_ -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 366 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 650 Major LT, Minor.TH Impedance Factor: 0.98 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.98 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.98 Movement Capacity: (pcph) -------------------------------------------------------- 636 Intersection Performance.Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay. Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph)(sec/veh) (veh) ------- (sec/veh) ----- --------- -------- ------ ------ ------------- EB L 0 636 > 1003 3.6 0.0 A 3.6 EB R 4 1003 > NB L 24 1139 3.2 0.0 A 0.8 Intersection Delay = 0.2 sec/veh 0 • • • HCS: Unsignaliz4ePIntersections Release 2� SW10&SW1.HC0 Page 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 Streets: (N -S) SW 1ST AVENUE (E -W) SW 10TH STREET Major Street Direction.... NS Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) Analyst ................... HAN Date of Analysis.......... 10/7/99 Other Information ......... BRICKELL MAINSTREET MUSP-W/O PROJECT Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection NorthboundSouthbound Eastbound Westbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes Stop/Yield Volumes PHF Grade MCIs M SU/RV's (%) CV's M PCE Is ------------ 0 0 0 Maneuver --------------- Time (tf) ------------------------------------------------------------------ Left Turn Major Road N 0 > 2 0 N 76 426 .891 .891 0 1.10 ---------------- Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) ------------------------------------------------------------------ Left Turn Major Road 5.50 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.50 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 7.00 3.40 M �i HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1g SW10&SW1.HCO Page 2 -----------Worksheet for TWSC Intersection ------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- Step 2: LT from Major Street SB NB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 0 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1714 Movement. Capacity: (pcph) 1714 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.95 TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 3400 Major LT Shared Lane Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.94 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 4: LT from Minor Street WB ------------ EB ------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 563 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 462 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0..94 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.94 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.94 Movement Capacity: (pcph) -------------------------------------------------------- 433 Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph)(sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh) -------- ------ ------ ------ WB L 86 433 -------------- ----- 10.4 0.8 C --------- 10.4 SB L 94 1714 2.2 0.0 A 0.3 Intersection Delay = 1.1 sec/veh • 0 0 HCS: Unsignalizeu Intersections Release 20 MIAMI&10.HC0 Page 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 --------------------------- Streets: (N -S) S. MIAMI AVENUE (E -W) S 10TH STREET Major Street Direction.... NS Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) Analyst. HAN Date of Analysis.......... 10/7/99 Other Information .......... BRICKELL MAINSTREET MUSP-W/O PROJECT Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection NorthboundSouthbound Eastbound Westbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes Stop/Yield Volumes PHF Grade MCIs M SU/RV's (%) CV's M PCE Is 0 > 2 <'0 N 10 275 13 .799 .799 .799 0 1.10 ---------------- 0 0 0 Maneuver ---------------- Time (tf) ------------------------------------------------------------------ Left Turn Major Road N 0 > 1 0 12 14 .667 .667 0 1.10 1.10 ---------------- Adjustment Factors 0 1 < 0 40 150 .767 .767 0 1.10 1.10 --------------- Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) ------------------------------------------------------------------ Left Turn Major Road 5.50 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.50 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 7.00 3.40 • HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1g MIAMI&10.HC0 Page 2 • Worksheet for TWSC Intersection ----------------------------- ------------ Step 1: RT from Minor Street WB EB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows:. (vph) 180 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1122 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1122 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.81 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 2: LT from Major Street SB NB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 0 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1714 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1714 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.99 TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 3400 RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 Major LT Shared Lane Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.99 ----------------------------------------------=--------- Step 3: TH from Minor Street WB EB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 365 373 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 667 660 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.99 0.99 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 661 654 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.91 --------- 0.96 ----------------------------------------------- Step 4: LT from Minor Street WB EB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 383 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 602 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0.91 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.93 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.75 Movement Capacity: (pcph) -------------------------------------------------------- 451 • • • 0'0- 10` • HCS: Unsignalized.Intersectiohs Release 2.1g MIAMI&10.HC0 Page 3 Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph) (sec/veh) -------------- (veh) ----- (sec/veh) --------- -------- EB L ------ 20 ------ ------ 451 > 541 7.2 0.2 B EB T 23 654 > 7.2 WB T 57 661 > 5.1 WB R 216 1122 > 979 5.1 1.3 B NB L 14 1714 2.1 0.0 A 0.1 Intersection Delay = 2.3 sec/veh • • 0'0- 10` HCS: UnsignalizeZT Intersections Release 2� SE1&SE10.HC0 Page 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of. Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 Streets: (N -S) SE 1ST AVENUE (E -W) SE 10TH STREET Analyst. HAN Date of Analysis.......... 10/7/99 Other Information ......... BRICKELL MAUNSTREET MUSP.-W/O PROJECT All -way -Stop -controlled Intersection Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound L T R L T R L T R L T. R ---- No. Lanes 0 > 1 < 0 0 > 1 < 0 0 > 1 < 0 0 > 1 < 0 Volumes 15 57 19 19 130 15 3 12 13 101 268 17 PHF .724 .724 .724 .875 .875 .875 .646 .646 .646 .877 .877 .877 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Volume Summary and Capacity Analysis WorkSheet ----------------------------------------------------------------------- QQ- 188 NB SB EB WB -------------------------------------------------------------------------- LT Flow Rate 21 22 5 115 RT Flow Rate 26 17 20 19 Approach Flow Rate 126 188 44 440 Proportion LT 0.17 0.12 0.11 0.26 Proportion RT .0.21 0.09. 0.45 0.04 Opposing Approach Flow Rate 188 126 440 44 Conflicting Approaches Flow Rate 484 484 314 314 Proportion, Subject Approach Flow Rate 0.16 0.24 0.06 0.55 Proportion, Opposing Approach Flow Rate 0.24 0.16 0.55 0.06 Lanes on Subject Approach 1 1 1 1 Lanes on Opposing Approach 1 1 1 1 LT, Opposing Approach 22 21 115 5 RT, Opposing Approach 17 26 19 20 LT, Conflicting Approaches 120 120 43 43 RT, Conflicting Approaches 39 39 43 43 Proportion LT, Opposing Approach 0.12 0.17 0.26 0.11 Proportion RT, .Opposing Approach 0.09 0.21 0.04 0.45 Proportion LT, Conflicting Approaches _ 0.25 0.25 0.14 0.14 Proportion RT, Conflicting Approaches 0.08 0.08 0.14 0.14 Approach Capacity --------------------------------------- 356 ----------- 387 -------- 471 ------ 747 ------- Intersection Performance Summary Approach Approach V/C Average Movement Flow Rate Capacity Ratio Total Delay LOS ---------- ---------- NB 126 356 0.35 3.8 A SB 188 387 0.49 6.3 B EB 44 471 0.09 1.4 A WB 440 747 0.59 9.4 B Intersection Delay = 7.3 Level of Service (Intersection) = B QQ- 188 • • ART -PLAN 3.1 Arterial Level of Service Estimating Software Based on Chapter 11 of the 1997 Highway Capacity Manual Update Florida Department of Transportation February 1999 DESCRIPTION Road Name SW 13 St From Brickell Ave. To SW 2 Ave. Peak Direction Westbound Off -Peak Direction Eastbound Study Time Period PM — w►optmz . Analysis Date 13-oct-99 User Notes Future (2001) wo/ Project TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS AADT 20,000 K Factor 0.094 D Factor 0.568 Peak Hour Factor 0.863 Adj. Saturation Flow Rate 11900 % Turns from Exclusive Lanes 21 ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS # Through Lanes Peak Direction 2 # Through Lanes Off -Peak Direction 2 Urbanized, Transitioning/Urban, or Rural U Arterial Class 3 Free Flow Speed (mph) 35 40 35 or 30) Free Flow Speed For Class fArea): Class 1 (R) Use of: 55, 50, 45, 40 or 35 Class 1 (U or T) 55, 50, or 45 Class 2 (U or T) 45,40 or 35 Class 3 (U or T) 40, 35, or 30 Class 4 U only) 35 30 or 25 SIGNALIZATION CHARACTERISTICS Arrival Type Peak Direction 4 (1,2,3,4,5,6) Arrival Type Off -Peak Direction 4 Type Signal System S P-Preemed.A-Act aied.s=semocwmW System Cycle Length 100 Weighted Through Movement g/C 0.49 C,0 -� 88 • • • Westbound PEAK DIRECTION SPECIFIC INPUTS PEAK DIRECTION RESULTS SW 13 St. v/c Ratio Control Delay Segment AADI Peak Hour (Enter 1 if Volume % Tums unavailable, (May be over- from 0 if segment written if direct Exclusive Number Segment is unused) measure avaa.) Lanes of Lanes Cycle Length at Signals 2-10 Effective g/C at Signals 2-10 Distance between Signals (Enter in Miles or Feet) Segment Length (FT) Arrival Type 1-2 1 1,2071 0 2 60 0.53 400.001 400 600 3 2-3 1 1,1961 0 2 60 0.55 600.001 3 3-4 1 1,4431 0 2 60 0.50 600.00 600 3 4-5 0 Length: Arterial 5-6 0 s-7 0 D 7-8 0 8-9 0 9-10 0 OFF-PEAK DIRECTION'S SPECIFIC INPUTS OFF-PEAK DIRECTION RESULTS PEAK DIRECTION RESULTS Eastbound Through SW 13 St. Movement Segment From To Flow Rate v/c Ratio Control Delay Westbound SW 13 St. Segment From To Through Movement Flow Rate v/c Ratio Control Delay Intersection Approach LOS Speed (MPH) Arterial Segment LOS 1-2 2-3 3-4 4-5 5-6 6-7 7-8 8-9 9-10 &i&en Ave. 1 Maori Ave 1399 1386 1672 Speed: 0.69 0.66 0.88 14.3 11.5 10.7 17.9 mph B B B 13.3 17.0 12.9 E D E Miami Ave SW t Ave SW t Ave SW 2 Ave. Miami Ave eriakeii Ave. Section Length: Arterial Speed = 0.303 miles LOS = 10.0 E mph Section Length: Arterial 0.303 Miles LOS: D Eastbound OFF-PEAK DIRECTION'S SPECIFIC INPUTS Segment Peak Hour Volume % Tums from Exclusive Lanes Number of Lanes Cycle Length at Signals 9-1 Effective g/C at Signals 9-1 Segment Length (FT) Arrival Type 10-9 9-8 8-7 7-6 6-5 5-4 4-3 3-2 2-1 600 600 400 584 01 21 60 0.55 3 611 01 21 60 0.53 3 476 601 11 115 0.17 3 OFF-PEAK DIRECTION RESULTS Eastbound Through SW 13 St. Movement Segment From To Flow Rate v/c Ratio Control Delay Intersection Approach LOS Speed (MPH) Arterial Segment LOS 10-9 9-8 8-7 7-6 6-5 s -a 4-3 3-2 2-1 1 677 708 221 0.32 0.35 0.70 7.8 8.5 57.2 A A E 19.6 18.9 4.1 C C F SW 2 Ave. SW 1 Ave SW i Ave Miami Ave Miami Ave eriakeii Ave. Section Length: Arterial Speed = 0.303 miles LOS = 10.0 E mph M 61 • ART -PLAN 3A Arterial Level of Service Estimating Software Based on Chapter 11 of the 1997 Highway Capacity Manual Update Florida Department of Transportation DESCRIPTION TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS Road Name From TO Peak Direction Off -Peak Direction Study Time Period Analysis Date User Notes Brickell Ave. SE 13 St SE 7 St Northbound Southbound Fp—m— w/optmz 13 -Oct -99 I Future (2001) wol r� U 30) AADT 20,000 K Factor 0.094 55, 50, or 45 D Factor 0.853 Class 2 (U or T) Peak Hour Factor 0.863 Adj. Saturation Flow Rate 1,900 % Turns from Exclusive Lanes 21 35 30 or 25 ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS # Through Lanes Peak Direction 2 Arrival Type Peak Direction # Through Lanes Off -Peak Direction 2 Arrival Type Off -Peak Direction Urbanized, Transitioning/Urban, or Rural U Type Signal System Arterial Class 3 r� U 30) For Class (Areal: Class 1 (R) use Free Flow speea or. 55, 50, 45, 40 or 35 Class 1 (U or T) 55, 50, or 45 Class 2 (U or T) 45,40 or 35 Class 3 (U or T) 40, 35, or 30 Class 4 U only) 35 30 or 25 SIGNALIZATION CHARACTERISTICS Arrival Type Peak Direction 4 (1,2,3,4,5,6) Arrival Type Off -Peak Direction 4 Type Signal System S P-Pre&rwdA=AcwaWd.S-SW acwatW System Cycle Length 100 Weighted Through Movement g/C 0.49 0 r1 Ll 0 Northbound PEAK DIRECTION SPECIFIC INPUTS Brickell Ave. Segment AADI Peak Hour (Enter 1 if Volume unavailable., (May be over- 0 ii segment written if direct Segment is unused) measure avail-) % Tums from Exclusive Number Lanes of Lanes Cycle Length at Signals 2-10 Effective g/C at Signals 2-10 Distance between Signals (Enter in Miles or Feet) Segment Length Arrival ( Type 1-2 1 1,3411 10.36 2 115 0.42 1600.001 1,600 300 3 2-3 1 2,026 33.26 3 115 0.58 300.00 3 3-4 0 4-5 0 SE B St SE 13 St 5-6 0 Section Length: Arterial Speed: 0.3598 Miles LOS: 6-7 0 1,2681 13.5 3 1151 0.51 3 1,9521 41.3. 21 1151 0.411 40 0 10 0 Southbound PEAK DIRECTION RESULTS Segment Peak Hour Volume Northbound Brickell Ave. Segment From To Through Movement Flow Rate control v/c Ratio Delay Intersection Approach LOS Speed (MPH) Arterial Segment LOS 1-2 2-3 3-4 4-5 5-6 6-7 7-8 8-9 9-10 SE 13 St SE B St 1393 1567 0.88 36.0 0.47 14.0 D B 15.3 9.8 D F SE 8 St SE 7 St SE 7 St SE s St SE B St SE 13 St Section Length:. Arterial Speed = 0.3598 mile(s) I LOS = Section Length: Arterial Speed: 0.3598 Miles LOS: 14.1 mph D 1,2681 13.5 3 1151 0.51 3 1,9521 41.3. 21 1151 0.411 Southbound OFF-PEAK DIRECTION'S SPECIFIC INPUTS Segment Peak Hour Volume % Tums from Exclusive Number Lanes of Lanes Cycle Length at Signals 9-1 Effective g/C at Signals 9-1 Segment Length Arrival (F) . Type 10-9 9-8 8-7 7-6 6-5 5-4 4-3 3-2 2-1 1,271 1,328 0.43 0.85 17.9 36.5 300 1,600 8.3 14.8 F D SE 7 St SE s St SE B St SE 13 St Section Length:. Arterial Speed = 0.3598 mile(s) I LOS = 13.2 E mph 1,2681 13.5 3 1151 0.51 3 1,9521 41.3. 21 1151 0.411 3 OFF-PEAK DIRECTION RESULTS Southbound Through Brickell Ave. Movement Segment From To Flow Rate v/c Ratio Control Delay Intersection Approach LOS Speed (MPH) Arterial Segment LOS 10-9 9-8 8-7 7-6 6-5 5-4 4-3 3-2 2-1 1,271 1,328 0.43 0.85 17.9 36.5 B D 8.3 14.8 F D SE 7 St SE s St SE B St SE 13 St Section Length:. Arterial Speed = 0.3598 mile(s) I LOS = 13.2 E mph mm i [7 APPENDIX E Calculation of Project's � Internal Capture Rate 0 W�W Multi -Use Trip Generation LAND USE B Ketail ITE LU Code Size Exit to External ;TotalInternal337 Enter 52Exit 51305 Total 104Enter from Ext % 14% _ 47 Demand Demand 72 1111101111111=78 Demand 33 33 46 46 Description 79 79 )% 50% Automated Section Mandatory Input 20 Demand 49 Deman 12 Balanced 14 Balanced 12 Demand 14 Demand LAND USE C Balance DemandITE LU Code 20 20 Size Total 31 31 Balance Demand Net External Trips for Multi -Use Develo merit ITE LU Code LAND USE A Size Exit to External Total 46 Enter 109 Exit 33 Total Enter from External [% 100% ® 49 Demand Demand 178 LAND USE B Ketail ITE LU Code Size Exit to External ;TotalInternal337 Enter 52Exit 51305 Total 104Enter from Ext % 14% _ 47 Demand Demand 72 1111101111111=78 Demand 33 33 46 46 Description 79 79 )% 50% Automated Section Mandatory Input 20 Demand 49 Deman 12 Balanced 14 Balanced 12 Demand 14 Demand LAND USE C Balance DemandITE LU Code 20 20 Size Total 31 31 Balance Demand Net External Trips for Multi -Use Develo merit 20 LAND USE A Demand 32 TOTAL Balanced 305 109 20 Exit 46 Balanced 32 452 Demand 642 LAND USE B Ketail ITE LU Code Size Exit to External ;TotalInternal337 Enter 52Exit 51305 Total 104Enter from Ext % 14% _ 47 Demand Demand 72 1111101111111=78 Demand 33 33 46 46 Description 79 79 )% 50% Automated Section Mandatory Input 20 Demand 49 Deman 12 Balanced 14 Balanced 12 Demand 14 Demand LAND USE C Balance DemandITE LU Code 20 20 Size Total 31 31 Balance Demand Net External Trips for Multi -Use Develo merit LAND USE A LAND USE B LAND USE C TOTAL Enter 33 305 109 447 Exit 46 337 69 452 Total 79 642 178 900 sin ie -Use TrIp Gen. Est. 158 748 255 1161 INTERNAL CAPTURE 23% 7I External Enter from External 44 109 109 33 69 ~ 77 178 69 M 70%IExit to External 1] APPENDIX F Future (2002) Level of Service � ,Calculations with the Project' • 0 • 0 Brickell Mainstreet MUSP 10/26/99 Future w/ Project (2001) PM Peak 08:57:59 Existing Cycle Length and Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.001 - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS GRADES PEDLEVELS PARKINGSIDES PARKVOLUMES BUSVOLUMES RIGHTTURNONREDS 1 - SW 7 St. & SW 2 Ave. SB WB NB EB 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 MODER MODER MODER MODER NONE NONE NONE NONE 20 20 20 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS RT TH LT 173 546 0 0.0 24.0 0.0 0 2 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.88 0.88 0.88 3 3 3 NO NO NO 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3330 0 Phasing Parameters SEQUENCES 11 ALL PERMISSIVES NO NO OVERLAPS YES YES CYCLES 80 80 GREENTIMES 32.00 40.00 YELLOWTIMES 4.00 4.00 CRITICALS 0 0 EXCESS 0 RT TH LT 138`1349 126 0.0 36.0 0.0 0 3 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.80 0.80 0.80 3 3 3 NO NO NO 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 4884 0 NO NO YES YES 10 RT TH " LT 0 367 200 0.0 24.0 0.0 0 2 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.94 0.94 0.94 3 3 3 NO NO NO 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 1965 0 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME RT TH LT 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.90 0.90 0.90 3 3 3 NO NO NO 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 0 0 NONE NONE 0.00 1 0.0 0 Brickell Mainstreet MUSP 10/26/99 Future W/ Project (2001) PM Peak 08:58:10 Existing Cycle Length and Phasing r SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver.1.001 - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 1 SW 7 St. & SW 2 Ave. Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.76 Vehicle Delay 21.9 Level of Service C+ Sq 11 North ------------------------- 1 Phase 1 1 Phase 2 1 -------------------------- + + + + ++++ v ++++ A V + + + + ------------------------- G/C=0.4001,G= G/C=0.500 G= 32.0" 40.0" Y+R= 4.0" Y+R= 4.0" OFF= 0.0% 1 OFF=45.0% ------------------------- C= 80 sec G= 72.0 sec = 90.0% Y= 8.0 sec = 10.0% Ped= 0.0.sec = 0.0% ------------------------------------------------------------------------.------- Lane g/C Service Rate Adj HCM L 190`% Maxl Group ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- lWidth/I Lanes Reqd Used I @C (vph) @E lVolumel v/c Delay I I S Queue SB Approach 21.2 C+ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TH+RT1 24/2 10.293 10.400 1 1232 1 1332 1 817 10.613 1 21.2 1 C+1 276 ft1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NB Approach 27.8 C ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ILT+TH 1 24/2 10.364 10.400 1 687 1 786 1 603 10.767 1 27.8 1 C 1 203 fti ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WB Approach 20.4 C+ 1LT+TH+RT1 36/3 10.428 10.500 1 2409 1 2442 1 2015 10.825 1 20.4 1 C+1 378 ft1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0®-- 188 • • • Brickell Mainstreet MUSP Future w/ Project (2001) PM Peak Existing Cycle Length and Phasing 10/26/99 08:58:39 SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.001 - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S. NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS GRADES PEDLEVELS PARKINGSIDES PARKVOLUMES BUSVOLUMES RIGHTTURNONREDS 2 - SW 7 St. & SW 1 Ave. SB WB NB EB 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 MODER MODER MODER MODER NONE NONE NONE NONE 20 20 20 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS RT TH LT 273 410 0 12.0 24.0 0.0 1 2 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.91 0.91 0.91 3 3 3 NO NO NO 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00.1.00 1.00 DOPT NORM NORM 1406 3414 0 Phasing Parameters SEQUENCES 11 ALL PERMISSIVES NO NO OVERLAPS YES YES CYCLES 80 80 GREENTIMES 36.00 33.00 YELLOWTIMES 5.00 6.00 CRITICALS 1 1 EXCESS - 0 RT TH LT 0 1405 115 0.0 36.0 0.0 0 3 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.79 0.79 0.79 3 3 3 NO NO NO 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 4991 0 NO NO YES YES 10 RT TH LT 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.90 0.90 0.90 3 3 3 NO NO NO 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 0 0 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME RT TH LT 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.90 0.90 0.90 3 3 3 NO NO NO 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 0 0 NONE NONE 0.00 1 0.0 0 i Brickell Mainstreet MUSP 10/26/99 Future w/ Project (2001) PM Peak 08:58:47 Existing Cycle Length and Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.001 - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 2 - SW 7 St. & SW 1 Ave. Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.77 Vehicle Delay 27.2 Level of Service C+ ------------------------- Sq 11 1 Phase 1 1 Phase 2 1 **/** ------------------------- * + + <++++ v ++++ v North' -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - iG/C=0.450 G/C=0.412 G= 36.0" G= 33.0" IY+R= 5.0" Y+R= 6.0" ,OFF= 0.0% OFF=51.3% C= 80 sec G= 69.0 sec = 86.3% Y=11.0 sec = 13.8% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Lane Width/i g/C Service Ratel HCM Adj L Maxi i Group ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ILanes Reqd Used I @C (vph) @E Volume v/c ( I Delay I S 190% Queue 11 SB Approach 15.2 B RT 12/1 0.251 0.450 551 139 I TH 1.24/2±10.216 10.450 1 1460 1 .1633 536 i 527 10.354 0.343 1 14.9 J*B+J B 163 ft 1 =------------------------------------------------------------------------------ WB Approach 31.9 C ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- JLT+TH 1 36/3 10.404 10.412 1 1973 1 2059 1 1924 10.934 1 31.9 1 C 1 424 ftl ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- • • • Brickell Mainstreet MUSP 10/26/99 Future w/ Project (2001) PM Peak 08:59:13 Existing Cycle Length and Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.001 - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # 3 - .S 7 St. & S. Miami Ave. METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS SB WB NB EB GRADES 0.0 0.0 0.0 0..0 PEDLEVELS MODER MODER MODER MODER PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 20 20 20 20 BUSVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 0 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS RT TH LT 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.90 0.90 0.90 3 3 3 NO NO NO 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 0 0 Phasing Parameters SEQUENCES 11 ALL PERMISSIVES NO NO OVERLAPS YES YES CYCLES 100 100 GREENTIMES 35.00 36.00 YELLOWTIMES 4.00 5.00 CRITICALS 0 0 EXCESS 0 3 RT TH LT 57 985 0 12.0 24.0 0.0 1 2 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 :2.0 0.81 0.81 0.81 3 3 3 NO NO NO 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 1406 3539 0 NO NO YES YES 10 RT TH LT 0 532 480 0.0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.92 0.92 0.92 3 3 3 NO NO NO 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM DOPT 0-3344 1406 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME RT TH LT 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.90 0.90 0.90 3 3 3 NO NO NO 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5..0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 0 0 NONE NONE 0.00 1 0.0 0 mm� • Brickell Mainstreet MUSP 10/26/99 Future w/ Project (2001) PM Peak 08:59:23 Existing Cycle Length and Phasing SIGNAL97./TEAPAC[Ver 1.001 - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 3 - S 7 St. & S. Miami Ave. Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.64 Vehicle Delay 20.2 Level of Service C+ Sq 11 North ------------------------- Phase 1 1 Phase 2 1 ------------------------- <+ + ++ -------- --------- G/C=0.438 G/C=0.450 G= 35.0" G= 36.0-- Y+R= 4.0" Y+R= 5.0" OFF= 0.0% OFF=48.8% ------------------------- C= 80 sec G= 71.0 sec = 88.8% Y= 9.0 sec = 11.3% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 Lane (Width/1 g/C I Service Rate lVolumel Adj 1 RCM I L 190% MaxlGroup LanesReqd Used @C (vph) @E v/c Delay S Queue ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NB Approach 18.6 B ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TH 0.274 0.438 381 463 746 17.6 236 1 LT 1 12/1+10.331 10.438 1 1530 1615 1 354 1 0.510 1 0.576 20.8 1 C+1 224 ft 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WB Approach 21.5 C+ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- RT 12/1 0.450 551 633 70 0.111 1 TH 1 24/2 10..147 0.376 10.450 1518 1 1593 1 1216 10.763 1 22.0 1 C+1 376 ft 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 00- 188 • • Brickell Mainstreet MUSP 10/26/99 Future w/ Project (2001) PM Peak 10:53:10 Existing Cycle Length and Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.001 - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS GRADES PEDLEVELS PARKINGSIDES PARKVOLUMES BUSVOLUMES RIGHTTURNONREDS 4 - SE 7 St. & Brickell Ave. SB WB NB EB 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 MODER MODER MODER MODER NONE NONE NONE NONE 20 20 20 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS RT TH LT 242 1228 11 12.0 24.0 12.0 1 2 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.88 0.85 0.88 3 3 3 NO NO YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 1406 3539 1770 Phasing Parameters RT TH LT 119 328 109 0.0 24.0 0.0 0 2 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.68 0.68 0.68 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3192 0 SEQUENCES 61 ALL PERMISSIVES YES NO NO NO OVERLAPS YES YES YES YES CYCLES 100 100 10 GREENTIMES 6.00 24.00 49.00 20.00 YELLOWTIMES 3.00 3.00 5.00 5.00 CRITICALS 0 0 0 .0 EXCESS 0 RT TH LT 11 1394 674 0.0 36.0 24.0 0' 3 2 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.84 0.84 0.84 3 3 3 NO NO YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 5076 3433 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME RT TH IT 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.90 0.90 0.90 3 3 3 NO NO NO 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 0 0 NONE NONE 0.00 1 0.0 0 Brickell Mainstreet MUSP 10/26/99 Future w/ Project (2001) PM Peak 10:53:24 Existing Cycle Length and Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.001 - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 4 - SE 7 St. & Brickell Ave. Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.83 Vehicle Delay 68.1 Level of Service E ------------------------------------------------- Sq 61.1 Phase 1 1 Phase 2 1 Phase 3 1 Phase 4 1 **/** ------------------------------------------------- + + + + ++++ +> <+ + +> <++++ v ++++ v North <+ <+ + +>1 + +> + + + + + + + + + + + + ------------------------------------------------- G/C=0.052 G/C=0.209 G/C=0.426 G/C=0.174 G= 6.0" G= 24.0" G= 49.0" G= 20.0" Y+R= 3.0" Y+R= 3.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" OFF= 0.0% 'OFF= 7.8% OFF=31.3% OFF=78.3% ------------------------------------------------- C=115 sec G= 99.0 sec = 86.1% Y=16.0 sec = 13.9% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 Lane (Width/I g/C 1 Service Ratel Adj 1 I HCM I L 190`k Maxl Group Lanes Reqd Used @C (vph) @E Volume v/c Delay S Queue ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SB Approach 39.5 D+ -------------------------------------------------------------------------- RT 12/1 0.348. 0.426 436 599 275 0.459 26.1 C+J 255 ft TH 24/2 10.454 0.426 1259 1508 1395 0.925 42.3 D+ 647 ft LT. 12/1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10.000 0.052 161 202 13 0.064 1 14.9 B+ 25 ft NB Approach 21.1 C+ 306 I 24/2 10.335 10.287 36/3 0.399 0.661 1 3354 521 1 3354 985 1 1673 802 10.499 0.814=1==43.5 10.4 1 D+1 462 ft ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WB Approach 269.6 F JLT+TH+RTI 24/2 10.351 10.174 1 1 1 544 1 817 11.472 1 269.6 1 F 1 545 ftl ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1=� !• • • 0 Brickell Mainstreet MUSP Future w Project (2001) PM Peak Existing Cycle Length and Optimized Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.001 - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS GRADES PEDLEVELS PARKINGSIDES PARKVOLUMES BUSVOLUMES RIGHTTURNONREDS 4 SE 7 St. & Brickell Ave. 10/26/99 10:53:53 SB WB NB EB 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 MODER MODER MODER MODER NONE NONE NONE NONE 20 20 20 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS RT TH LT 242 1228 11 12.0 24.0 12.0 1 2 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.88 0.88 0.88 3 3 3 NO NO YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00.1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 1406 3539 1770 Phasing Parameters RT TH LT 119 328 109 0.0 24.0 0.0 0 2 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.68 0.68 0.68 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3192 0 SEQUENCES 61 ALL PERMISSIVES YES NO NO NO OVERLAPS YES YES YES YES CYCLES 100 100 10 GREENTIMES 6.00 22.00 42.00 29.00 YELLOWTIMES 3.00 3.00 5.00 5.00 CRITICALS 0 0 0 0 EXCESS 0 RT TH LT 11 1394 674 0.0 36.0 24.0 0 3 2 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.84 0.84 0.84 3 3 3 NO NO YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 5076 3433 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME RT TH LT 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2..0 0.90 0.90 0.90 3 3 3 NO NO NO 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 0 0 NONE NONE 0.00 1 0.0 0 • Brickell Mainstreet MUSP 10/26/99 Future w Project (2001) PM Peak 10:54:04 Existing Cycle Length and Optimized Phasing SIGNAL9.7/TEAPAC[Ver 1.001 - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 4 - SE 7 St. & Brickell Ave. Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.83 Vehicle Delay 51.9 Level of Service D -------------------------------------------------- Sq 61 1 Phase 1 1 Phase 2 1 Phase 3 1 Phase 4 1 **/** ------------------------------------------------- + +++ I A + I + + + I ++++ +>. <+ + +> ( <++++ v ++++ A v North <+ <+ + +> + +>I + + + + + + + + + + + + ------------------------------------------------- G/C=0.052 G/C=0.191 G/C=0.365 G/C=0.252 l G= 6.0" G= 22.0-- G= 42.0" G= 29.0" Y+R= 3.0" Y+R= 3.0" I Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" OFF= 0.0% OFF= 7.8% OFF=29.6% I OFF=70.4% ' ------------------------------------------------- C=115 sec G= 99.0 sec = 86.1% Y=16.0 sec = 13.9% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- l Lane I Width/I g/C I Service Rate lVolumel Adj I HCM I L 19096 Maxl Group Lanes Reqd Used @C (vph) @E v/c Delay S Queue ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SB Approach 26.4 76.6 E RT 12/1 0.348 10.365 1 311 1513 275 10.536 32.8 C 282 ft TH 24/2 0.454 10.365 1 935 1395 11.079 l 85.7 F 716 ft LT 12/1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0.000 10.052 1 11293 141 183 13 10.069 1 18.7 B 25 ft NB Approach 26.4 C+ ----------------------------- ------------------------------------------------- 2396 2 673 15.7 l I24/2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10.39910.566 11 0.867 l 0.335 10.270 1 925 802 48.8 I D 473 ft WB Approach 78.5 E ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ILT+TH+RTI'24/2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10.351 10.252 1 242 1 805 1 817 11.015 1 78.5 I E 1 494 ftl Co. 188 • • ® t Brickell Mainstreet MUSP 10/26/99 Future w/ Project (2001) PM Peak 09:00:56 Existing Cycle Length and Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC(Ver 1.001 - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS GRADES . PEDLEVELS PARKINGSIDES PARKVOLUMES BUSVOLUMES RIGHTTURNONREDS 5 - SW 8 St. & SW 2 Ave. SB WB NB I EB 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 MODER MODER MODER MODER NONE NONE NONE NONE 20 20 20 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS RT TH LT 0 526 156 0.0 24.0 0.0 0 2 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.88 0.88 0.88 3 3 3 NO NO NO 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3172 0 Phasing Parameters RT TH LT 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.90 0.90 0.90 3 3 3 NO NO NO 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 0 0 SEQUENCES 21 ALL PERMISSIVES YES NO. NO OVERLAPS YES YES YES CYCLES 60 60 10 GREENTIMES 5.00 32.00 32.00 YELLOWTIMES 3.00 4.00 4.00 CRITICALS 0 0 0 EXCESS 0 NO YES RT TH LT 20 439 0 0.0 24.0 0.0 0 2 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.91 0.91 0.91 3 3 3 NO NO NO 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0. 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3501 0 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME RT TH LT 118 910 124 0.0 36.0 0.0 0 3 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.96 0.96 0.96 3 3 3 NO NO NO 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 4827 0 NONE NONE 0.00 1 0.0 0 Brickell Mainstreet MUSP Future w/ Project (2001) PM Peak Existing Cycle Length and Phasing SIGNAL97•/TEAPAC[Ver 1.001 - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 5 - SW 8 St. & SW 2 Ave. Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.53 Vehicle Delay 18.1 ------------------------------------- Sq 21 Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 **/** ------------------------------------- + +> + +> v v A + + + + + +> + + + + > + + ++++ + + v ----------- --------------------------- G/C=0..063 . G/C=0.400 G/C=0.400 G= 5.0" G= 32.0" G= 32.0" Y+R= 3.0" Y+R= 4.0" Y+R= 4.0" OFF= 0.0`k OFF=10.0% OFF=55.0% ------------------------------------- C= 80 sec G= 69.0 sec = 86.3% Y=11.0 sec = 13.8% North 10/26/99 .09:01:05 Level of Service B Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Lane Width/I g/C Service Rate Adj I HCM I L 190% MaxGroup ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ILanes Reqd Used I @C (vph) @E lVolumel v/c Delay S Queue • SB Approach 14.3 B+ JLT+TH 24/2 10.294 10.500 1 1531 1 1586 1 775 10.489 1 14.3 B+J 218 ftl ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NB Approach 17.5 B TH+RTI 24/2 10.206 10.400 1 1301 1 1401 1 504 10.360 1 17.5 1 B ( 170 ftl ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- EB Approach 20.7 C+ JLT+TH+RTJ 36/3 10.285 10.400 1 1836 1 1931 1 1200 10.621 1 20.7 1 C+J 270 ftl ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0 ® ^ 188 • L, Brickell Mainstreet MUSP Future w/ Project (2001) PM Peak Existing Cycle Length and Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.001 - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # 6 - SW 8 St. & SW 1 Ave. METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters 10/26/99 09:01:26 APPLABELS SB WB NB EB GRADES 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 PEDLEVELS MODER MODER MODER MODER PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 2.0 20 20 20 BUSVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 0 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS RT TH LT 0 351 137 0.0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.92 0.92 0.92 3 3 3 NO NO NO 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3539 1406 Phasing Parameters SEQUENCES 11 ALL PERMISSIVES NO NO OVERLAPS YES YES CYCLES 100 100 GREENTIMES 38.00 34.00 YELLOWTIMES 4.00 4.00 CRITICALS 0 0 EXCESS 0 RT TH LT 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.90 0.90 0.90 3 3 3 NO NO NO 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 0 0 NO NO YES YES 10 RT TH LT 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.90 0.90 0.90 3 3 3 NO NO NO 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 0 0 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME RT TH LT 180 985 0 0.0 36.0 0.0 0 3 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.97 0.97 0.97 3 3 3 NO NO NO 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 4892 0 NONE NONE 0.00 1 0.0 0 Brickell Mainstreet MUSP 10/26/99 Future w/ Project (2001) PM Peak 09:01:37 Existing Cycle Length and Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.001 - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 6 - SW 8 St. & SW 1 Ave. Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.47 Vehicle Delay 16.9 Level of Service B ------------------------- Sq 11 1 Phase 1 1 Phase 2 1 **/** ------------------------- + + v North ++++> v ------------------------- G /C=0.475 G/C=0.425 G= 38.0" G= 34.0" Y+R= 4.0" Y+R= 4.0" OFF= 0.0% OFF=52.5% ------------------------- C= 80 sec G= 72.0 sec = 90.0% Y= 8.0 sec = 10.0% Ped= O.O.sec = 0.0% --------------------------------------------------------------=---------------- Lane (Width/I g/C l Service Ratel Adj I l HCM 1. L 190%Maxl Group Lanes Reqd Used @C (vph) @E Volume v/c Delay S Queue ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SB Approach 12.8 B+ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TH 24/2 0.175 0.475 618 681 382 0.227 12.7 13 ft LT 12/1 10.204 10.475 1 1592 1 1668 �. 149 10.223 1 13.1 1 B+1 188 ftl ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- EB Approach 18.7 'B ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TH+RTJ 36/3 10.282 10.425 1 2001 1 2079 1 1201 10.578 1 18.7 1 B 1 259 ftl ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Brickell Mainstreet IPSP 10/26/99 Future w/ project (2001) PM Peak 10:54:43 Existing Cycle Length and Phasing • SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.001 - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # 7 - S 8 St. & S Miami Ave. METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION.PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS SB WB NB EB GRADES 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 PEDLEVELS MODER MODER MODER MODER PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 20 20 20 20 BUSVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 0 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS RT TH LT 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00.0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.90 0.90 0.90 3 3 3 NO NO NO 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 0 0 Phasing Parameters SEQUENCES 11 ALL PERMISSIVES NO NO OVERLAPS YES YES CYCLES 100 100 GREENTIMES 44.00 28.00 YELLOWTIMES 4.00 4.00 CRITICALS 0 0 EXCESS 0 0 RT TH LT 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.90 0.90 0.90 3 3 3 NO NO NO 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 0 0 NO NO YES YES 10 RT TH LT 70 739 0 0.0 24.0 0.0 0 2 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.91 0.91 0.90 3 3 3 NO NO NO 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1:00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1'.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3464 0 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME RT TH LT 0 911 223 0.0 36.0 0.0 0 3 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.90 0.93 0.93 3 3 3 NO NO NO 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 4840 0. NONE NONE 0.00 1 0.0 0 • • Brickell Mainstreet MUSP 10/26/99 Future w/ project (2001) PM Peak 10:54:52 Existing Cycle Length and Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.001 - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages.for Int # 7 - S'8 St. & S Miami Ave. Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.61 Vehicle Delay 19.6 Level of Service B ------------------------- Sq 11 Phase 1 Phase 2 **/** ------------------------- North + +> ++++> ------------------------- G/C=0.550 G/C=0.350 G= 44..0" G= 28.0" Y+R= 4.0'" Y+R= 4.0" OFF= 0.0% OFF=60.0% ------------------------- C= 80 sec G= 72.0 sec = 90.0% Y= 8.0 sec = 10.0% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Lane (Width/I g/C I Service Rate lVolumel Adj ( HCM I L (90% MaxiGroup Lanes Reqd Used @C (vph) @E v/c Delay S Queue ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NB Approach 11.7 B+ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TH+RTJ 24/2 10.302 10.550 1 1877 1 1905 1 889 10.467 1 11.7 1 B+1 225 ftj ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- EB Approach 25.3 C+ ------------------=------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ILT+TH 1 36/3 10.288 10.350 1 1566 1 1694 1 1220 10.720 1 25.3 1 C+j 297 ft) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0"0- 188 r� • is • Brickell MainstreettSP 10/26/99 Future w/ Project (2001) PM Peak 10:55:22 Existing Cycle Length and Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.001 - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # . 8 - SE 8 St. & Brickell Ave. METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS SB WB NB EB GRADES 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 PEDLEVELS MODER MODER MODER MODER PARKINGSIDES NONE. NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 20 20 20 20 BUSVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 .0 0 0 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS RT TH LT 0 1136 171 0.0 36.0 24.0 0 3 2 0.00 0.00.0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.87 0.87 0.87 3 3 3 NO NO YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 5085 3433 Phasing Parameters RT TH LT 542 329 0 12.0 24.0 0.0 1 2 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.96 0.96 0.96 3 3 3 YES. YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 DOPT NORM NORM 1406 3139 0 SEQUENCES 27 27 PERMISSIVES NO NO NO NO OVERLAPS YES NO YES YES CYCLES 115 115 10 GREENTIMES 8.00 55.00 24.00 10.00 YELLOWTIMES 3.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 CRITICALS 3 8 11 4 EXCESS 0 RT TH LT 139 1202 0 12.0 24.0 0.0 1 2 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.88 0.88 0.88 3 3 3 NO NO YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 .1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1:00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 1406 3539 0 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME : RT TH LT 318 296 367 0.0 24.0 24.0 0 2 2 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.92 0.92 0.92 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3090 3433 NONE LAG 0.00 1 0.0 0 • 1] • Brickell Mainstreet 0SP Future w/ Project (2001) PM Peak Existing Cycle Length and Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.001 - Capacity Analysis Summary 10/26/99 10:55:33 Intersection Averages for Int # 8 - SE 8 St. & Brickell Ave. Degree of Saturation (v/c).0.98 Vehicle Delay 149.3 Level of Service F ------------------------------------------------- S q 27 1 Phase 1 1 Phase 2 1 Phase 3 1 Phase 4 1 **/LG ------------------------------------------------- + * + I I ^ + * + **** /I\ + *> + ( <++++ v v North Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Lane JWidth/l g/C I Service Rate lVolumel Adj I HCM I L 190% MaxlGroup Lanes ReqdUsed QC (vph) @E v/c Delay S Queue ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SB Approach * +> ****> C+ * + **** 0.353 10.574 2831 * + v ------------ G/C=0.070 ------------------------------------- G/C=0.478 G/C=0.209 G/C=0.087 G= 8.0" I G= 55.0"G= 24.0" G= 10.0." Y+R= 3.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" OFF= 0.0% I OFF= 9.6% OFF=61.7% OFF=87.0% ------------------------------------------------- C=115 sec G= 97.0 sec = 84.3% Y=18.0 sec = 15.7% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Lane JWidth/l g/C I Service Rate lVolumel Adj I HCM I L 190% MaxlGroup Lanes ReqdUsed QC (vph) @E v/c Delay S Queue ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SB Approach 22.2 C+ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TH 36/3 0.353 10.574 2831 1 919 2208 306 1197 300 ft I ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- LT 1 24/2 10.244 0.070 1 1 10.824 1 73.2 1*E+1 148 fti NB Approach 28.6 C ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- RT 0.478 1 538 672 133 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TH 1 24/2 10.294 0.448 10.478 1513 1 1693 1 1366 10.235 0.807 29.7 J,B C 1 576 ft WB Approach 653.1 F ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- RT 12/1+ 0.322 0.087 1 97 271 2.221 1 627.7 J 400*F I ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TH 1 24/2-10.317 10.087 1 1 243 1 637 12.333 663.8 1 470 ft1 EB Approach 72.2 E ---------------------------------------------------------------- 24/2 0.326 0.209 1 427 I ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- LH+RT1 24/2 10.270 10.209 1 1 716 1 399 11.036 0.557 1 41.7 J*F+J D 255 ft 1 11 • 1] • Brickell Mainstreet ISP Future w Project (2001) PM Peak Existing Cycle Length w/ Mitigations 10/26/99 10:56:01 SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.001 - Summary .of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # 14ETROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS GRADES PEDLEVELS PARKINGSIDES PARKVOLUMES BUSVOLUMES RIGHTTURNONREDS 8 - SE 8 St. & Brickell Ave. SB WB NB EB 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 MODER MODER MODER MODER NONE NONE NONE NONE 20 20 20 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS RT TH LT 0 1136 171 0.0 36.0 24.0 0 3 2 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.87 0.87 0.87 3 3 3 NO NO YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 5085 3433 Phasing Parameters RT TH LT 542 0 329 24.0 0.0 12.0 2 0 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.96 0.96 0.96 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 2474 0 1770 SEQUENCES 27 ALL PERMISSIVES NO NO NO NO OVERLAPS YES YES YES YES CYCLES 115 115 10 GREENTIMES 6.00 48.00 21.00 20.00 YELLOWTIMES 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 CRITICALS 3 9 11 5 EXCESS 0 RT TH - LT 139 1202 0 12.0 24.0 0.0 1 2 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.88 0.88 0.88 3 3 3 NO NO YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 1406 3539 0 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME RT TH LT 318 296 367 12.0 24.0 12.0 1 2 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.92 0.92 0.92 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 DOPT NORM DOPT 1406 3158 1406 NONE LAG 0.00 1 0.0 0 Brickell MainstreetIISP 10/26/99 Future w Project (2001) PM Peak 10:56:10 Existing Cycle Length w/ Mitigations SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 8 - SE 8 St. & Brickell Ave. Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.82 Vehicle Delay 56.8 Level of Service E+ ------------------------------------------------- Sq 27 1 Phase 1 1 Phase 2 1 Phase 3 1 Phase 4 1 **/LG ------------------------------------------------- * ^ I A + * ++++1 + ++++1 + *> + v v ++++ ++++ v North + +> ****> + + ++++ + + v ------------------------------------_------------- G/C=0.052 G/C=0.417 G/C=0.183 G/C=0.174 G= 6.0" G= 48.0" G= 21.0" G= 20.0", Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" OFF= 0.0% 1 OFF= 9.6% OFF=55.7% OFF=78.3% ------------------------------------------------- C=115 sec G= 95.0 sec = 82.6% Y=20.0 sec = 17.4% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 Lane (Width/I g/C Service Ratel--Volumel--- Adj 1 HCM 1 L 190% Max1 --Group---Lanes--Reqd---Used-I @C-(vph)-@Ev/c---Delay---S---Queue- SB Approach 36..4 D+ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 36/3 0.353 609 343 LT 24/2 10.244 10.513 0.052 1 2461 1 2148 1 1197 10.501 1.101 1 151.2 J*B F 1 151 ft ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NB Approach 41.0 D+ ------------------------------------------------------------------ RT 12/1 0.294 0.417 419 57 158 0.269 23.1 C+ 149 ft I TH 1 24/2 10.448 1 0.417 1 1215 1 1477 1366 10.925 1 43.0 1 D+1 643 ft1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WB Approach 81.1 F ____________ RT 24/2 0.337 10.270 667 565 0.847 49.7 D 334 ft I LT 12/1 10.319 0.174 1 271 1 286 1 343 11.114 1.132.9 1 F 1 458 ft1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- EB Approach 87.4 F RT 112/1+ 0.310 0.183 1 235 249 10.969 1 94.0 JF 329 ft TH 24/2- 0.307 0.183 1 568 5.86 1.016 88.4 *F 387 ft LT 12/1+ 0.302 0.183 1 235 232 10.903 77.9 E 307 ft ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0 Brickell Mainstreet ISP Future w/ Project (2001) PM Peak Existing Cycle Length and Phasing � J 10/26/99 09:04:20 SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.001 - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS GRADES PEDLEVELS PARKINGSIDES PARKVOLUMES BUSVOLUMES RIGHTTURNONREDS 9 - SW 13 St. & SW 2 Ave. SB WB NB EB 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 MODER MODER MODER MODER NONE NONE NONE NONE .20 20 20 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS RT TH IT 272 173 145 12.0 12.0 0.0 1 1 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.85 0.85 0.85 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 1406 1385 0 Phasing Parameters SEQUENCES 11 ALL PERMISSIVES NO NO OVERLAPS YES YES CYCLES 100 100 GREENTIMES 22.00 30.00 YELLOWTIMES 4.00 4.00 CRITICALS 0 0 EXCESS 0 • RT TH LT 160 1312 15 0.0 24.0 0.0 0 2 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.82 0.82 0.82 3 3 3 NO NO NO 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3266 0 NO NO YES YES 10 RT TH LT 20 83 118 0.0 12.0 0.0 0 1 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.86 0.86 0.86 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 857 0 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME RT TH LT 5 481 68 0.0 24.0 0.0 0 2 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.95 0.95 0.95 3 3 3 NO NO NO 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 2020 0 r- r NONE NONE 0.00 1 0.0 0 11 Brickell Mainstreet osp Future w/ Project (2001) PM Peak Existing Cycle Length and Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.001 - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 9 - SW 13 St. & SW 2 Ave. Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.91 Vehicle Delay 49.0 ------------------------- Sq 11 Phase 1 1 Phase 2 1 ------------------------- + + + <+ + +> <++++ v ++++ ++++ v <+ + +> ++++> + + + ++++ + + + v ------------------------- G/C=0.367 I G/C=0.500 G= 22..0" G= 30.0° Y+R= 4.0" Y+R= 4.0" OFF= 0.0% OFF=43.3% ------------------------- C= 60 sec G= 52.0 sec = 86.7% North 10/26/99 09:04:31 Level of Service D Y= 8.0 sec = 13.3% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Lane Service Rate Adj HCM L Maxi GroupLanes ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- IWidth/i g/C ReqdUsed I @C (vph) @E v/c IVolumel I Delay I S 190% Queue SB Approach 20.2 C+ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- RT 12/1 10.273 10.367 459516 320 17.9 ( B 171 ftILT+TH 12/1 ------------=------------------------------------------------------------------ 0.315 0.367 I 451 I 508 ( 375 10.620 0.738 i 22.1 C+I 200 ft NB Approach 32.8 C ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ILT+TH+RTI 12/1 --------=---------------------------------------------------------------------- 10.360 10.367 1 263 1 314 1 257 10.818 1 32.8 1 C 1 137 ftl WB Approach 73.9 E ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ILT+TH+RTI 24/2 ------------------- 10.554 ------------------------------------------------------------ 10.500 1 1618 1 1633 1 1813 11.110 1 73.9 1 E 1 382 ftj EB Approach 12.9 B+ ILT+TH+RTI 24/2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10.327 10.500 1 972 1 1010 1 583 10.577 1 12.9 1 B+1 123 ftj 00— 188 • • • Brickell Mainstreet 0SP Future w/ Project (2001) PM Peak Existing Cycle Length and Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.001 - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # 10 - SW 13 St. & SW 1 Ave. METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS GRADES PEDLEVELS PARKINGSIDES PARKVOLUMES BUSVOLUMES RIGHTTURNONREDS 10/26/99 09:05:01 SB WB NB EB 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 MODER MODER MODER MODER NONE NONE NONE NONE 20 20 20 20 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS RT TH LT 289 110 73 12.0 12.0 12.0 1 1 1 0.00 0.00.0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.87 0.87 0.87 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 1406 1863 1770 Phasing Parameters SEQUENCES 11 ALL PERMISSIVES NO NO OVERLAPS YES YES .CYCLES 60 60 GREENTIMES 19.00 33.00 YELLOWTIMES 4.00 4.00 CRITICALS 0 0 EXCESS 0 RT TH LT 0 1190 6 0.0 24.0 0.0 0 2 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0'.2.0 0.80 0.80 0.80 3 3 3 NO NO NO 4.0 4.0 4.0 5..0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3371 0 NO NO YES YES 10 RT TH LT 12 0 36 0.0 12.0 0.0 0 1 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.60 0.60 0.60 3 3 3 YES .YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 1263 0 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME RT TH LT 23 603 0 0.0 24.0 0.0 0 2 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.90 0.90 0.90 3 3 3 NO NO NO 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 .5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3507 0 NONE NONE 0.00 1 0.0 0 11MEM'60 J Brickell MainstreetSP 10/26/99 Future w/ Project (2001) PM Peak 09:05:14 Existing Cycle Length and Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.001 - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 10 - SW 13 St. & SW 1 Ave. Degree of Saturation (v/c).0.62 Vehicle Delay 14.3 Level of Service B+ ------------------------- Sq 11 Phase 1 Phase 2 **/** ------------------------- <+ + +> <++++ v ++++ j v North <+ +> I ++++> + + ++++ + + I v ------------------------- G/C=0.317 G/C=0.550 G= 19.0" G= 33.0" Y+R= 4.0" 1.Y+R= 4.0" OFF= 0.0% 1 OFF=38.3% ------------------------- C= 60 sec G= 52.0 sec = 86.7% Y= 8.0 sec = 13.3% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% ----------------------------------------------------------------=-------------- ane L idth/ Serice RT 1 12/1 0.281 0.317 0% Maxi ,Queue l ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- IWI 0.746 25.1 C+ S 12/1 • SB Approach 21.2 C+ RT 1 12/1 0.281 0.317 384 445 332 0.746 25.1 C+ 191 ft TH 12/1 0.101 0.317 525 590 126 0.214 15.2 B 73 ft LT 112/1 0.077 0.317 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 496 560 84 0.150 14.8 B+ 48 ft NB Approach 12.3 B+ ------------------- ILT+TH+RTJ 12/1 16.102 10.383 1 429 1 484 1 80 10.165 1 12.3 1 B+J 42 ftl ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WB Approach 14.8 B+ JLT+TH 1 24/2 10.452 10.550 1 1854 1 1854 1 1494 10.806 1 14.8 1 B+J 283 ftl ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- BB Approach 8.1 A TH+RTJ 24/2 10.227 10.550 1 1929 1 1929 1 696 10.361 1 8.1 1 A 1 132 ftl ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- • • 1-1 Brickell Mainstreet MUSP 10/26/99 Future w/ Project (2001) PM Peak 10:56:37 Existing Cycle Length and Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.001 - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # 11 - S 13 St. & S Miami Ave. METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS SB WB NB EB GRADES 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 PEDLEVELS MODER MODER MODER MODER PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 20 20 20 20 BUSVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 0 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS RT TH LT 139 139 12 0.0 24.0 0.0 0 2 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.76 0.76 0.76 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 2929 0 Phasing Parameters SEQUENCES 11 ALL PERMISSIVES NO NO OVERLAPS YES YES CYCLES 60 60 GREENTIMES 18.00 32.00 YELLOWTIMES 5.00 5.00 CRITICALS 0 0 EXCESS 0 RT TH LT 126 1078 41 0.0 24.0 0.0 0 2 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.82 0.82 0.82 3 3 3 NO NO NO 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3117 0 NO NO YES YES 10 RT TH LT 36 104 76 0.0 24.0 0.0 0 2 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.94 0.94 0.94 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 2487 0 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME RT TH IT 45 519 116 0.0 24.0 0.0 0 2 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.88 0.88 0.88 3 3 3 NO NO NO 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 1822 0 NONE NONE 0.00 1 0.0 0 Brickell Mainstreet MUSP 10/26/99 Future w/ Project (2001) PM Peak 10:56:45 Existing Cycle Length and Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.001 - Capacity Analysis Sunmary Intersection Averages for Int # 11 - S 13 St. & S.Miami Ave. Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.77 Vehicle Delay 19.9 Level of Service B ------------------------- Sq 11 1 Phase 1 1 Phase 2 1 **/**-------------------------- < . -------------------------<+ + +> <++++ v ++++ North ++++ v <+ + +> ++++> + + + v ------------------------- G /C=0.300 G/C=0.533 G= 18.0" G= 32.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" OFF= 0.0% OFF=38.3% ------------------------- C= 60 sec G= 50.0 sec = 83.3% Y=10.0 sec = 16.7% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Lane g/C Service RatelVolumel Adj HCM L 7------- 190% MaxlGroup l ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (Width/l LanesReqd Used I @C (vph) @E v/c Delay l I S Queue SB Approach 17.2 B ------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------- ILT+TH+RTI 24/2 10.160 10.300 1 809 1 879 ( 382 10.435 1 17.2 1 B 1 113 ftl ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NB Approach 16.4 B ILT+TH+RTI 24/2 10.124 10.300 1 677 1 746 1 230 10.308 1 16.4 1 B 1 68 ftl ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WB Approach 22.0 C+ ILT+TH+RTI 24/2 10.494 10.533 1 1655 1 1662 1 1519 10.914 1 22.0 1 C+J 299 ftl ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- EB Approach 18.1 B ----------------- JLT+TH+RTI 24/2 10.453 10.533 938 1 972 1 773 10.795 1 18.1 1 B 1 152 ftl ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- y 9 • • Brickell Mainstreet MUSP 10/26/99 Future w/ Project (2001) PM Peak 10:57:17 Existing Cycle Length and Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.001 - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # 12 - SE 13 St. & Brickell Ave.. METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS SB WB NB EB GRADES 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 PEDLEVELS MODER MODER MODER MODER PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 20 20 20 20 BUSVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 0 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS RT TH LT 763 1154 46 12.0 24.0 12.0 1 2 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.89 0.89 0.89 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 1406 3539 693 Phasing Parameters RT TH LT 73 308 136 12.0 12.0 12.0 1 1 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.89 0.89 0.89 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 1406 1863 1770 SEQUENCES 17 ALL PERMISSIVES NO NO NO OVERLAPS NO YES YES CYCLES 100 100 10 GREENTIMES 69.00 15.00 16.00 YELLOWTIMES 5.00 5.00 5.00 CRITICALS 0 0 0 EXCESS 0 NO YES RT TH LT 42 574 162 0.0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.95 0.95 0.95 3 3 3 NO NO YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3480 264 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME RT TH LT 131 126 246 12.0 12.0 12.0 1 1 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.92 0.92 0.92 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5-.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM DOPT 1406 1832 1770 NONE LAG 0.00 1 0.0 0 Brickell Mainstreet MUSP 10/26/99 Future w/ Project (2001) PM Peak 10:57:26 Existing Cycle Length and Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.001 - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 12 - SE 13 St. & Brickell Ave.. Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.75 Vehicle Delay 54.6 Level of Service D ------------------------------------- Sq 17 Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 **/LG ------------------------------------- + + + A <+ + +> <++++ v A ++++ North ++++ v <+ + +> ++++> + + + v -------------------------------------- G/C=0.600 G/C=0.130 G/C=0.139 G= 69.0" G= 15.0" G= 16.0" Y+R='5.0" Y+R= 5.0" I Y+R= 5.0" OFF= 0.0% OFF=64.3% OFF=81.7% ----------------------------------- C=115 sec G=100.0 sec = 87.0% Y=15.0 sec = 13.0% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% ----------------------------------------------------------------=-------------- Lane(Width/I g/C I Service Rate Adj IVolumei I HCM I L 190% MaxiGroupLanes -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Reqd Used @C (vph) @E 57.9 v/c Delay S Queue SB Approach 72.9 31.6 C ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- RT 12/1 10.650 0.600 1 774 844 857 1.015 57.9 E+ 554 ft TH 24/2 TH 0.600 2059 2124 1297 0.611 15.0 B 419 ft LT 112/1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10.427 0.259 0.600 357 416 52 0.125 1 10.1 B+ 34 ft NB Approach 33.9 C ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 24/2 0.319 0.600 209 ft I LT+RTI 12/1 10.768 10.600 1 2119 1 2152 1 171 11.082 1.111.7 18.3 I F+, 111 ft1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WB Approach 153.9 F ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- RT 12/1 0.247 0.139 1 171 82 0.418 46.7 D 114 ft TH 12/1 0.313 0.139 1 234 346 1.336 224.5 F 481 ft LT 1.12/1 0.259 0.139 1 221 153 0.622 51.5 D 213 ft ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- EB Approach 72.9 E RT 12/1 0.267 0.130 1 157 142 0.776 67.1 E+ 200 ft TH 12/1- 0.271 0_271--0_130------1----205------- 0.130 1 213 207 0.866 75.7 E 291 ft I 27 ftl-- ----LT---------- - _853----7- -- ----- 00- 188 • • Brickell Mainstreet MUSP 10./26/99 Future w Project (2001) PM Peak 10:57:57 Existing Cycle Length .w Mitigations SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.001 - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # 12 - SE 13 St. & Brickell Ave... METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS SB WB NB EB GRADES 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 PEDLEVELS MODER MODER ..MODER MODER PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES .20 20 20 20 BUSVOLUMES 0 0 0 0 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 0 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS RT TH LT 763 1154 46 12.0 24.0 12.0 1 2 1 0.00 0.00 .0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.89 0.89 0.89 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00.1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 1406 3539 756 Phasing Parameters RT TH LT 73 308 136 0.0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.89 0.89 0.89 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3373 1770 SEQUENCES 37 ALL PERMISSIVES NO NO YES NO OVERLAPS YES YES YES YES CYCLES .115 115 10 GREENTIMES 10.00 47.00 19.00 19.00 YELLOWTIMES 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 CRITICALS 0 0 0 0 EXCESS 0 RT TH LT 42 574 162 0..0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.95 0.95 0.95 3 3 3 NO NO YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3480 1770 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME RT TH LT 131 126 246 12.0 12.0 12.0 1 1 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.92 0.92 0.92 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM DOPT 1406 1832 1770 NONE LAG 0.00 1 0.0 0 M�� Brickell Mainstreet MUSP 10/26/99 Future w Project (2001) PM Peak 10:58:06 Existing Cycle Length w Mitigations SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.001 - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 12 - SE 13 St. & Brickell Ave.. Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.76 Vehicle Delay 40.7 Level of Service D+ ------------------------------------------------- Sq 37 1 Phase 1 1 Phase 2 1 Phase 3 Phase 4 1 **/LG ------------------------------------------------- 1+++ + + + + ++++ /I\ <+ + +> <+ <++++ v ++++ North Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% ----------------------------------------------------------------=-------------- 1 Lane JWidth/1 ++++ v <+ + +> <+ + +> ++++> 190%Maxi --Group---Lanes--Regd---Used-I ---------------------------------------------------- g/C @C-(vph)-@Ev/c- 1 D+ 620 ft + + + + + + v - ------------------------------------------------- G/C=0.087 G/C=0.409 G/C=0.165 I G/C=0.165 G= 10.0" G= 47.0" I G= 19.0" G= 19.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" I Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" OFF= 0.0% 1 OFF=13.0% OFF=58.396 OFF=79.1% ------------------------------------------------- C=115 sec G= 95.0 sec = 82.6% Y=20.0 sec = 17.4% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% ----------------------------------------------------------------=-------------- 1 Lane JWidth/1 Service Rate Adj I--Volumel--- HCM I I L 190%Maxi --Group---Lanes--Regd---Used-I ---------------------------------------------------- g/C @C-(vph)-@Ev/c- 1 D+ 620 ft LT 1 12/1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Delay---S---Queue 21.8 - SB Approach 42.7 D+ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- RT 12/1 0.650 10.617803 868 857 0.987 48.9 D 530 ft TH 24/2 0.427 0.409 1210 1446 1297 39.5 1 D+ 620 ft LT 1 12/1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10.897 0.255 10.409 1 217 304 52 0.168 21.8 C+ 50 ft NB Approach 21.5 C+ TH+RT1 24/2 0.319 10.5391155 757 1209 876 648 15.5 241 I LT 12/1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10.102 0.087 1 1 1 171 10.345 0.781 1 44.1 1 D+1 148 ft WB Approach 50.6 D ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TH+RT1 24/2 10.275 10.165 1 1 545 52.3 289 LT 12/1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0.259 0.165 1 1 269 1 153 10.768 0.524 1 45.6 1 D 1 206 ft 1 EB Approach 50.7 D RT ' 12/1 10.267 10.165 1 1 208 142 0.612 49.3 D 192 ft 0.165 1 281 207 3 51.4 D 279 ft I LT 12/1+10.271 10.165 1 1 269 197 0.675 51.1 D 266 ft ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- • • E HCS: UnsignalizoIntersections Release A SW9&SW1.HC0 Page 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville., FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 Streets: (N- S) SW 1ST AVENUE (E -W) SW 9TH STREET Major Street Direction.... NS' Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) Analyst...-..... :*"'******** HAN Date of Analysis.......... 10/7/99 Other Information ......... BRICKELL MAINSTREET MUSP-WITH PROJECT Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection ---------------------------------------------------------=------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Northbound SouthboundEastbound Westbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes. Stop/Yield Volumes PHF Grade MCIs M SU/RV's (%) CV's M PCE Is ------------ 0 0 0 Maneuver ------------------------------------------------------------------ --------------- Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road N 0 2 0 N 481 .883 0 ---------------- Adjustment Factors 1 0 0 172 .721 0 1.10 --------------- Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver ------------------------------------------------------------------ Gap (tg), Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road 5.50 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.50 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 7.00 3.40 00- 188 • • • HCS: ,Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.19 SW9&SW1.HC0 Page 2 -----------Worksheet for TWSC Intersection ------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- Step 4: LT from Minor Street WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 545 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 475 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 1.00 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 1.00 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 1.00 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 475 -------------------------------------------------------- Intersection Performance.Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph) (sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh) --------------- ------ -------------------- ----- --------- WB L 263 475 16.9 3.8 C Intersection Delay = 1 4.4 sec/veh iF1 16.9 • • • HCS: Unsignalize*Intersections Release 210 MIAMI&S9.HC0 Page 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Streets: (N -S) S. MIAMI AVENUE (E -W) S 9TH STREET Major Street Direction.... NS Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) Analyst ................... HAN Date of Analysis........... 10/7/99 Other Information ......... BRICKELL MAINSTREET MUSP-WITH PROJECT Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection ----------------------------------------------------------------------- NorthboundSouthbound Eastbound Westbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes Stop/Yield Volumes PHF Grade MC, s (s) SU/RV' s ( %) CV's M PCE Is ------------ 0 > 2 < 0 N 88 553 10 .841 .841 .841 0 1.10 --------------- 0 0 0 Maneuver ---------------I Time (tf) ------------------------------------------------------------------ Left Turn Major Road N Adjustment Factors 0 1 < 0 128 110 .863 .863 0 1.10 1.10 --------------- Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) ------------------------------------------------------------------ Left Turn Major Road 5.50 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60. Through Traffic Minor Road 6.50 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 7.00 3.40 vo— -188 • HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1g MIAMI&S9.HC0 Page 2 --Worksheet for TWSC Intersection ------------------------------------------------------ Step l: RT from Minor Street WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 335 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 937 FlowMove Movement Capacity: (pcph) 937 Total Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.85 Cap -------------------------------------------------------- Step 2: LT from Major Street SB NB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting. Flows: (vph) (pcph) .0 Potential Capacity: (pcph) (veh) 1714 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1714 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 140 0.93 TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 3400 RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 Major LT Shared Lane Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.92 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 3: TH from Minor Street WB EB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 769 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 387 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements Movement 'Capacity: (pcph) 0.92 354 Prob. of Queue -Free State: -------------------------------------------------------- 0.54 • Movement WB T. WB R Intersection Performance Summary 937 NB L 116 1714 > 497 18.4 4.7 LOS C 2.3 0.1 A Intersection Delay = 5.1 sec/veh Approach Delay (sec/veh) 18.4 0.3 Avg. 95% FlowMove Shared Total Queue Rate Cap Cap Delay Length (pcph) (pcph) (pcph)(sec/veh) (veh) 163 354 140 937 NB L 116 1714 > 497 18.4 4.7 LOS C 2.3 0.1 A Intersection Delay = 5.1 sec/veh Approach Delay (sec/veh) 18.4 0.3 • • • HCS: UnsignalizoIntersections Release 2 SE1&SE9.HC0_. Page l Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil .Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 Streets: (N -S) SE 1ST AVENUE (E -W) SE 9TH STREET Major Street Direction.... NS Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) Analyst, ...... : ...........HAN Date of -Analysis ........ f Analysis........10/7/99 Other Information ......... BRICKELL MAINSTREET MUSP-WITH PROJECT Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection -------------------------------------=--------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- NorthboundSouthbound Eastbound Westbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes Stop/Yield Volumes PHF Grade MC' s ( %) SU/RV's (%) CV' s ( %) PCE Is 0 > 1 0 N 2 8' 94 .83 .83 0 1.10 --------------- 0 1 < 0 N 157 167 .815 .815 0 --------------- 0 > 0 < 0 10 14 1 1 0 1.10 1.10 ---------------- Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time. (tf) ------------------------------------------------------------------ Left Turn Major Road 5.00 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.00 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 6.50 3.40 t HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1g SE1&SE9.HC0 Page 2 . ---Worksheet for TWSC Intersection Step -l: RT from Minor Street WB EB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 296 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 980 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 980 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.98 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 2: LT from Major Street SB _ NB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 398 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1108 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1108 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.97 TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) (sec/veh) Major LT Shared Lane Prob. ------ 566 of Queue -Free State: 0.96 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 4: LT from Minor Street WB EB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 442 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 587 Major LT, Minor TH A 5.0 Impedance Factor: 0.96 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.96 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.96 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 566 -------------------------------------------------------- Intersection Performance Summary Intersection Delay = • 0.5 sec/veh 0®-- 188 Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap . Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph)(sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh) -------- ------ EB L 11 ------ 566 ------ > ------- ------- ----- --------- 748 5.0 0.0 A 5.0 EB R 15 980 > NB L 37 1108 3.4 0.0 A 0.8 Intersection Delay = • 0.5 sec/veh 0®-- 188 • • • HCS: UnsignalizIntersections Release 20 SW10&SW1.HC0 Page 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville., FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 Streets (N- S) SW 1ST AVENUE (E -W) SW 10TH STREET Major Street Direction.... NS Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) Analyst...-..... :*'"*"*** HAN Date of Analysis.......... 10/7/99 Other Information ......... BRICKELL MAINSTREET MUSP-WITH PROJECT Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection ------------------------------ NorthboundSouthbound Eastbound Westbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes. Stop/Yield Volumes PHF Grade MC's M SU/RV's (%) CV's ( o) PCE's ------------ 0 0 0 Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) ------------------------------------------------------------------ Left Turn Major Road N--------------' 0 > 2 0 N 209 466 .891 .891 0 1.10 ---------------- Adjustment Factors 0 0 0 Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) ------------------------------------------------------------------ Left Turn Major Road 5.50 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.50 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 7.00 3.40 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1g SW10&SW1.HC0 Page 2 ------Worksheet for TWSC Intersection ---------------------------------- Step 2: LT from Major Street SB NB 7 ------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 0 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1714 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1714 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.85 TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 3400 Major LT Shared Lane Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.82 ----------=--------------------------------------------- Step 4: LT from Minor Street WB EB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 758 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 347 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0._82 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.82 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0..82 Movement Capacity: (pcph) -------------------------------------------------------- 285 Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph) (sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh) -------- ------ ------ ------ WB L 154 285 -------------- ----- 27.2 3.5 D --------- • SB L 259 1714 27.2 2.5 0.6 A 0.8 Intersection Delay = 3.3 sec/veh ��- 1U8 C� • C� HCS: UnsignalizieIntersections Release 20 MIAMI&10.HC0 Page 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 Streets: (N -S) S. MIAMI AVENUE (E -W) S 10TH STREET Major Street Direction.... NS Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) Analyst ................... HAN Date of Analysis....... .. 10/7/99 Other Information ......... BRICKELL MAINSTREET MUSP-WITH PROJECT Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection NorthboundSouthbound Eastbound Westbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes Stop/Yield Volumes PHF Grade MC's M SU/RV's (%) CV's M PCE Is ------------ 0 > 2 < 0 N 36 329 23 .799 .799 .799 0 1.10 --------------- 0 0 0 Maneuver ---------------- Time (tf) ------------------------------------------------------------------ Left Turn Major Road N 0 > 1 0 159 63 .667 .667 0 1.10 1.10 ---------------- Adjustment Factors 0 1 < 0 54 184 .767 .767 0 1.10 1.10 --------------- Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) ------------------------------------------------------------------ Left Turn Major Road 5.50 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.50 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 7.00 3.40 • HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1g MIAMI&10.HC0 Page 2 for TWSC Intersection --_-_-Worksheet ----- ---------------------------------------=--- ,Step l: RT from Minor Street WB EB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 220 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1071 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1071 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.75 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 2: LT from Major Street SB NB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 0 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1714 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1714 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.97 TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl)' 3400 RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 Major LT Shared Lane Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.97 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 3: TH from Minor Street WB EB --------------=----------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 472 486 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 578 567 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.97 0.97 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 558 548 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.86 0.81 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 4: LT from Minor Street WB EB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 492 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 513 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0.83 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.87 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.66 Movement Capacity: (pcph) --------------------------------------------------------- 337 • • • Intersection Delay = 31.0 sec/veh HCS: ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Unsi9 nalized Intersections Release 2® MIAMI&10.HC0 Page 3 Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach . Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph) (sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh) -------- EB L ------ 262 ------ 337 ------ > 378 -------------- 110.9 ----- 19.4 F --------- EB T 103 548 > 110.9 WB T 77 558:> 6.6 WB R 264 1071 > 887 6.6 2.1 B NB L 50 1714 2.2 0.0 A 0.2 Intersection Delay = 31.0 sec/veh Unsignaliz*Intersections Release 2� SE1&SE10.HC0 Page 1 HCS: --------------------------------------------------------------- Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 ------------------ Streets: (N -S) SE 1ST AVENUE (E -W) SE 10TH STREET Analyst.......:*". '**. HAN Date of Analysis.......... 10/7/99 Other Information ......... BRICKELL MAINSTREET MUSP-WITH PROJECT All -way Stop -controlled Intersection Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound L T R L T. R L T R L T R No . 'Lanes ---- ---- ---- 0 > 1 < 0 ---- ---- ---- 0 > 1 < 0 ---- 0 > ---- ---- 1 < 0 ---- ---- 0 > 1 ---- < 0 Volumes 25 67 19 29 140 25 41 23 23 111 316 27 PHF .724 .724 .724 .875 .875 .875 .646 .646 .646 .877 .877 .877 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Volume Summary and Capacity.Analysis Worksheet ----------------------------------------------------------------------- NB SB EB WB ----------------------------------------------------------------------- LT Flow Rate 35 33 63 127 RT Flow Rate 26 29 36 31 .Approach Flow Rate 154 222 135 518 Proportion LT 0.23 0.15 0.47 0.25 Proportion RT 0.17 0.13 0.27 0.06 • Opposing Approach Flow Rate 222 154 518 135 Conflicting Approaches Flow Rate 653 653 376 376 Proportion, Subject Approach Flow Rate 0.15 0.22 0.13 0.50 Proportion, Opposing Approach Flow Rate 0.22 0.15 0.50 0.13 Lanes on Subject Approach 1 1 1 1 Lanes on Opposing Approach 1 1 1 1 LT, Opposing Approach 33 35 127 63 RT, Opposing Approach 29 26 31 36 LT, Conflicting Approaches 190 190 68 68 RT, Conflicting Approaches 67 67 55 55 Proportion LT, Opposing Approach 0.15 0.23 0.25 0.47 Proportion RT, Opposing Approach 0.13 0.17 0.06 0.27 Proportion LT, Conflicting Approaches 0.29 0.29 0.18 0.18 Proportion RT, Conflicting Approaches 0.10 0.10, 0.15 0.15 Approach Capacity 326 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 330 512 598 Intersection Performance Summary Approach Approach V/C Average Movement Flow Rate Capacity Ratio Total Delay LOS ---------- ---------- --------- ------- NB 154 326 0.47 ----------- 6.0 ---- B SB 222 330 0.67 12.9 C EB 135 512 0.26 2.7 A WB 518 598 26.9 D -0.87 Intersection Delay 17.6 Level of Service (Intersection) _ C C6"-.C7� • • ART -PLAN 3A Arterial Level of Service Estimating Software Based on Chapter 11 of the 1997 Highway Capacity Manual Update Florida Department of Transportation February 1999 DESCRIPTION Road Name SW 13 St From Brickell Ave. To SW 2 Ave. Peak Direction westbound Off -Peak Direction Eastbound Study Time Period PM -W/o — Analysis Date 13 -Oct -99 User Notes I Future (2001) w/ Project TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS AADT 20,000 K Factor 0.094 D Factor 0.853 Peak Hour Factor 0.863 Adj. Saturation Flow Rate 1,900 % Tums from Exclusive Lanes 21 ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS # Through Lanes Peak Direction 2 # Through Lanes Off -Peak Direction 2 Urbanized, Transitioning/Urban, or Rural U Arterial Class 3 Free Flow Speed (mph) 35 40 35 or 30) Free Flow Soeed For Class (Area): Class 1 (R) Use of: 55, 50, 45, 40 or 35 Class 1 (U or T) 55, 50, or 45 Class 2 (U or T) . 45, 40 or 35 Class 3 (U. or T) 40, 35, or 30 Class 4 U only) 35 30 or 25 SIGNALIZATION CHARACTERISTICS Arrival Type Peak Direction 4 (1,2,3,4,5,6) Arrival Type Off -Peak Direction 4 Type Signal System S P-Pmdn*dA-AcWted.S-semiacwaW System Cycle Length 100 Weighted Through Movement g/C 0.49 0®- 188 • • • • Westbound PEAK DIRECTION SPECIFIC INPUTS PEAK DIRECTION RESULTS SW 13 SL Eastbound SW 13 St. Segment From To Segment AADI Peak Four (Enter 1 if Volume unavailable, (May be over- 0 if segment written if direct Segment is unused) measure avail.) % Tums from Exclusive Number Lanes of Lanes Cycle Length at Signals 2-10 Effective GIC at Signals 2-10 Distance between Signals (Enter in Miles or Feet) Segment Length Arrival (FT) Type 1-2 1 1,245 0 2 60 0.53 400.00 400 600 600 3 2-3 1 1,196 0 2 60 0.55 600.00 3 3-4 1 1,487 0 2 60 0.50 600.00 3 4-5 0 LOS 5-6 0 LOS 6-7 0 Bridcell Ave. 7-8 0 1443 8-9 1 0 B 13.1 E 2-3 Miami Ave SW I Ave 1386 9-10 1 01 1 10.6 OFF-PEAK DIRECTION RESULTS PEAK DIRECTION RESULTS Eastbound SW 13 St. Segment From To Through Movement Flow Rate Westbound Through Intersection Approach LOS Speed (MPH) Intersection 10-9 9-8 8-7 7-6 6-5 5-4 4-3 3-2 2-1 Arterial SW 13 St. Movement 0.35 0.39 0.70 Control Approach Speed Segment Segment From To Flow Rate v/c Ratio Delay LOS (MPH) LOS 1-2 Bridcell Ave. Mlarrd Ave 1443 0.71 11.8 B 13.1 E 2-3 Miami Ave SW I Ave 1386 0.66 10.6 B 17.0 D 3-4 SW t Ave SW 2 Ave. 1723 0.91 19.4 B 12.3 E 4-5 5-6 6-7 7-8 8-9 9-10 Length: Arterial Speed: 14.0 mph Section 0.303 Miles LOS: E Eastbound OFF-PEAK DIRECTION'S SPECIFIC INPUTS % Tums Cycle Effective from Length g/C Segment Peak Hour Exclusive Number at Signals at Signals Length Antval Segment Volume Lanes of lanes 9-1 9-1 (FT) Type 10-9 9-8 8-7 7-6 6-5 5-4 626 0 2 60 0.55 3 4-3 600 680 0 2 60 0.53 3 3-2 600 1 503 62.1 1 115 0.171 3 2-1 400 OFF-PEAK DIRECTION RESULTS Eastbound SW 13 St. Segment From To Through Movement Flow Rate v/c Ratio Control Delay Intersection Approach LOS Speed (MPH) Arterial Segment LOS 10-9 9-8 8-7 7-6 6-5 5-4 4-3 3-2 2-1 725 788 221 0.35 0.39 0.70 7.9 8.8 57.0 A A E 19.4 18.7 4.1 C C F SW 2 Ave. SW I Ave Sw t Ave Miami Ave Miami Ave Brickeu Ave. Section Length: Arterial Speed = 0.303 mile(s) LOS = 10.0 E mph low F14 �UA�' AJ LAS �rG - f. F, _ 9527 m l l 7 „0 ER145Z5 �a9 ( all n i* l 8'30 �r NdS+YG 8530 t :r t3i 9539 68 7 —A (TA MfA.UI TRAIL) Y 3T C. 3 / .N �._ 20 -. 20' g 8585 n 8528 2g� iti 2b24 n d49 339 C 3578 w b 84c2 > L S 1 i 1 2 25t I15 a �. 339 4 �0„ 8337 1:-90 2453 � > g'• �2„ of ro j8433> Q 219) 8330 ` b„ gIC9 ST 4" r2 8335 8530 20 862b `r _ -Elf? OA" =? 2 � 8528 3 v 117 0 8436 a7�i 7C2; 7175 b2 llb 7 339 r' M F 8626 1 ^438 s 1 � y 1 A�� �, � P i 9 ' a 2 '� z��`h ►121 " m •4'a6a AST 6 a I s s4 9692 ro 5184 + 117 8 2 163 8826 3 1 168 7982 1 78ee 9 I 8625 164 458 IIS fd 1 339 >`� a_ 4 ! 1695 219 . PI -� 12" d _ S� ST 1 964 3 _ 1 2as3 35T '0 T f k 2' r2" 12 �R C w 6 e■ 8626 +;70 I e 4 , v 452 t 4" (a 1 �. �a 0� 1.7 fie 219 c 6. 8184 N f _ t032 439 2 2 b8 �('•,Q/3 996.-I a, f` 10 1 }$1 3097 3 y a�SB�6 0�1'3,gi .1Z 4 = + Yi Loi s ? F _ A 1852 7783 +6" _ —16" Q� `m� 9582��--` g 16� 8'l! F1°-�, 8311 4130: 8311 9600 c 7405 8107 e • �izp i I 219 r asQ z tai! 9 J Ab s• �1�55 a 438 453 453 /4 3b: I 337 { _ �g,�aST 6, A� .� SWW ER./�5 ; 3 S% Sp a ---`-- T - =3 —`S -r31 1 �\ 7-17-9T /: ' 9 ► N �' 7b9e 8113 ,?' • i�yti,3, c ,26� 219, io 4 $ 211 79sr + 9_11 3-17 89 �" 7695 728 I e •��ly -r.' i +� :076 X38 2„ --- 17 -117 3fl ✓` �� c� — ���3 3557 J7 tl A �llf,: �a s., ti� f Q 312 T693 �y :s716 U72 454 �� 0212 C�g.1 \ / �j f 3 f -r If2 1389 3 , 3 S.W. ra " T s .I 3d 54 • Ei� ti 6.s., +n j _ �O� T'' 4 B '° leJ. �0 193q(j 7698 � � (� �8 '� �, �J 104 3112 ,,x )47' a nFl 4 SEWE2 ATLAS 11 !6) 1J1 WI 1I nFl 4 SEWE2 ATLAS 11 s r-, • BRICKELL MAINSTREET MIAMI, FLORIDA SITE UTILITY STUDY Prepared By: CONSUL -TECH ENGINEERING, INC. 3141 Commerce Parkway Miramar, Florida 33025 November 1999 CTE Project No. 99-0411 00— Iss • C7 I. II • 0 SITE CONDITIONS The property is located within the City block bound by SW 9TH Street and SE 9TH Avenue on the north, SW 10TH Street and SE 10TH Avenue on the south, SE 11T Avenue on the east and extends approximately 445 feet west of S. 'Miami Avenue, which bisects the property. Numerous one and two story wood frame and concrete block building structures along with significant vacant space presently exist within the property limits. A mixed use (hotel/retail/restaurant) development is proposed for the property. The planned development will consist of approximately 288 hotel rooms, 32,000 s. f. of restaurant area, 165,380 s. f. of retail space and a 1,500 s. f. community center. DRAINAGE A. DRAINAGE AREAS The total area to be developed is approximately 4.15 acres and will consist of two (2) drainage areas (basins) as a result of the property being bisected by S. Miami Avenue. For purposes of this study, the two (2) drainage areas will be referred to as the western and eastern western drainage areas (basins). The western and eastern drainage areas will have areas of approximately 3.06 acres and 1.09 acres, respectively. The planned development will be characterized by an overall imperviousness of approximately 85%, while providing approximately 15% pervious area in the form of at grade landscape areas and planters. An approximate breakdown of the impervious/pervious areas by drainage areas is anticipated as follows: Drainage Area Total Area Impervious Area Pervious Area Western 3.06 Acres 2.85 Acres 0.21 Acres Eastern 1.09 Acres 0.77 Acres 0.32 Acres 0Q- i C)" S' B. EXISTING DRAINAGE A review of the project's survey does not indicate any existing drainage structures within the various lots which have building structures. It is appears that runoff from the from the various vacant and developed lots with the project's property presently runoff into the adjacent streets and into the street drainage systems owned and maintained by the City of Miami. It is assumed at this time that the City of Miami's street drainage systems adjacent to the limits of the project have sufficient capacity to handle the runoff generated within the street right-of-ways. C. ON-SITE DRAINAGE The proposed drainage system for each drainage area (western and eastern) will be designed to retain 100% of the runoff generated by the proposed building and site development. Drainage wells will be installed within each drainage area to provide the required retention necessary to retain 100% of the runoff for the 5 Year - 24 Hour design storm as required by the Dade County Department of Environmental Resources Management, Water Control Section (DERM). Runoff generated by the building and site improvements for each drainage area will be collected by series of interconnected site and roof drainage structures and conveyed to detention structures, sized to meet DERM detention time requirements, prior to the runoff being directed to drainage the proposed drainage wells. It is anticipated that the installation of three (3) drainage wells within the western drainage area and one (1) drainage well within the eastern drainage well will be required to provide the necessary retention to handle the runoff and to meet DERM standards. The proposed drainage wells will be able to keep the project dry for the 5 Year - 24 Hour storm, keep the runoff from exceeding the perimeter berm for the 25 Year - 72 Hour storm and keep the finished floor protected for the 100 Year - 72 Hour storm. 00— 188 Refer to Table 1 for drainage calculations corresponding to the aforementioned design storms and denoting the determination of required number of drainage wells for each drainage area.. D. OFFSITE DRAINAGE Modifications to the grade/elevation of S. Miami Avenue and possibly SW/SE l OTx Street are anticipated with the development of the project as a result of required transitions in grading of vehicular and pedestrian access ways to the proposed buildings. Any required modifications to the existing street drainage or installation of new drainage improvements associated with the aforementioned street modifications will be designed and constructed in accordance with DERM criterion and the City of Miami standards 0 II WATER DISTRIBUTION The Miami -Dade Water and Sewer Authority Department (MDWASD) provides water service for the area in which the project is located. Refer to the attached copy of MDWASD's water atlas depicting their water distribution system in the vicinity of the property. According to the water atlas, MDWASD owns and operates the following water mains within the streets adjacent to the proposed project: SW 9THStreet - 4" SE 9THStreet - 12" SW 10' Street - 6" SE 10' Street - 6" S. Miami Avenue - 6" and 16" SE IST Avenue - -12" 0 Neither development of the property nor the anticipated modification of S. Miami Avenue and possibly SW/SE IOTH Streets will require the removal of any of the above noted MDWASD owned water mains. However, MDWASD will require the interconnection of the 12" water on SW 1 ST Avenue with the 16" water main on S Miami Avenue by way of the installation of a 12 water main along SW 9TH Street. Installation of the 12" water main will be necessary to improve the fire flow for the proposed development. No other water main extensions are anticipated to be required by MDWASD to service the project. The domestic, fire and irrigation services for those buildings planned within eastern portion of the project will be provided from the either the existing 12" water mains on SE IST Avenue or on S. Miami Avenue or the 16" water main on S. Miami Avenue. With regards to those buildings planned within the western portion of the project, it is anticipated that the domestic, fire and irrigation services will be provided from the new 12" water main to be installed along SW 9TH Street The anticipated average daily water consumption for this project will be 128,738 gpd, as noted in the calculations shown on Table 2. III SANITARY SEWER The Miami -Dade Water and Sewer Department (MDWASD) also provides sewer service in the areas of the project. Refer to the attached copy of the MDWASD's sewer atlas depicting their existing sewer system in the vicinity of the property. According to the sewer atlas, MDWASD owns and operates the following sewer mains within the adjacent streets to the proposed project: SW 9TH Street - 6" gravity SE 9TH Street - 6" gravity SW 10' Street - 24' interceptor SE 10TH Street - 6" gravity 00- 188 • S. Miami Avenue - 6" gravity SE IST Avenue - 8" gravity It is anticipated that the sewer service for the planned buildings within the eastern portion of the project will be provided by way of connection(s) into the existing 8" gravity sewer main in SE 1sT Avenue. Several existing laterals terminate at the property line of the project and may possibly be used for the required connection(s). Otherwise a private gravity main extension will be provided to collect the flows from the planned buildings. With regards to the planned buildings within the western portion of the project, it is anticipated that any one (1) of the three (3) existing 6" gravity sewer mains adjacent to that portion of the property will provide the required connection(s) for service. All sewage flows generated by the project will be collected in the existing MD WASD gravity sewer systems and conveyed downstream to MDWASD Pump Station #1. According to the Dade County Department of Environmental Resources Management, Wastewater Section, the pump station is presently operating at 7.1 hours per day and has adequate capacity remaining to handle the anticipated flows to be generated by this project. The anticipated average daily sewage flow for this project will be 128,738 gpd, as noted in the calculations shown in Table 2. IV SOLID WASTE GENERATION Solid waste generated by the proposed project will be collected in standardized on-site containers for refuse and recyclables and picked -up on a regular basis by either private hauling companies and or the City of Miami Solid Waste Department. The solid waste collected will be transported to the Metro -Dade County Disposal and Recycling facilities. The anticipated daily volumes of solid waste to be generated by the project are summarized in Table 3. • TABLE 1 BRICKELL MAINSTREET DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS A. EASTERN DRAINAGE AREA: Drainage Area Impervious Pervious Average Coefficient of Runoff Design Storm Information 1. 5 Year storm (DERM) Time of Concentration Rainfall Intensity Peak Runoff = 1.09 Acres 0.77 Acres = 0.32 Acres _ (0.95(0.77)+0.30(0.32))/1.09 = 0.76 = 10.00 minutes = 6.17 in/hr = 0.76(1.09)(6.17) = 5.11 cfs 2. 25 Year - 72 Hour storm (SFWMD) 24 Hour Rainfall = 9.0 inches Maximum Rainfall Intensity = 6.984 in/hr Peak Runoff = 0.76(1.09)(6.984). = 5.79 cfs 3. 100 Year - 72 Hour storm (SFWMD) 24 Hour Rainfall = 11.0 inches Maximum Rainfall Intensity = 7.436 in/hr Peak Runoff = 0.76(1.09)(7.436) = 6.16 cfs Well Data Well Diameter Assumed Well Capacity Mean High Tide Head Loss due to Specific Gravity Proposed Number of Wells I = 24 inches = 1,000 gpm/ft. of available head = 1.48 ft.(per W.C. 20,034-A) = 1.50 ft. =1 00- 188 Hydraulic Grade Line Elevation at Well Structure 1. 5 year storm (DERM) = 5.11 cfs/((1,000 gpm)(0.002228 cfs/gpm)(1 well)) + (1.48 + 1.50) = 5.27 ft. 2. 25 Year - 72 Hour storm (SFWMD) = 5.04 cfs/((1,000 gpm)(0.002228 cfs/gpm)(1 well)) + (1.48 + 1.50) = 5.24 ft. 3. 100 Year - 72 Hour storm (SFWMD) = 6.16 cfs/((1,000 gpm)(0.002228 cfs/gpm)(1 well)) + (1.48 + 1.50) = 5.75 ft. Well Detention Structure Volume Required DERM Detention Time = 90 seconds Required Well Structure Volume = (5.11 cfs)(90 seconds)/1 structure = 459.9 cu. ft. B. WESTERN DRAINAGE AREA: Drainage Area = 3.06 Acres Impervious = 2.85 Acres Pervious = 0.21 Acres Average Coefficient of Runoff = (0.95(2.85)+0.30(0.21))/3.06 = 0.91 Design Storm Information 1. 5 Year storm (DERM) Time of Concentration = 10:00 minutes Rainfall Intensity = 6.17 in/hr Peak Runoff = 0.91(3.06)(6.17) = 17.18 cfs 2. 25 Year - 72 Hour storm (SFWMD) 24 Hour Rainfall = 9.0 inches Maximum Rainfall Intensity = 6.984 in/hr Peak Runoff = 0.91(3.06)(6.984) = 19.45 cfs 3. 100 Year - 72 Hour storm (SFWMD) 24 Hour Rainfall - = 11.0 inches Maximum Rainfall Intensity = 7.436 in/hr Peak Runoff = 0.91(3.06)(7.436) = 20.71 cfs ®- 188 Well Data Well Diameter = 24 inches Assumed Well Capacity = 1,000 gpm/ft, of available head Mean High Tide = 1.48 ft.(per W.C. 20,034-A) Head Loss due to Specific Gravity = 1.50 ft. Proposed Number of Wells = 3 Hydraulic Grade Line Elevation at Well Structure 1. 5 year storm (DERM) = 17.18 cfs/((1,000 gpm)(0.002228 cfs/gpm)(3 well)) + (1.48 + 1.50) = 5.55 ft. 2. 25 Year - 72 Hour storm (SFWMD) = 16.94 cfs/((1,000 gpm)(0.002228 cfs/gpm)(3 well)) + (1.48 + 1.50) 5.51 ft. 3. 100 Year - 72 Hour storm (SFWMD) = 20.71 cfs/((1,000 gpm)(0.002228 cfs/gpm)(3 well)) + (1.48 + 1.50) = 6.08 ft. Well Detention Structure Volume Required DERM Detention Time = 90 seconds Required Well Structure Volume = (17..18 cfs)(90 seconds)/3 structures = 515.1 cu. ft. 00- 188 • TABLE 2 BRICKELL MAINSTREET ANTICIPATED AVERAGE DAILY WATER CONSUMPTION Hotel: 288 rooms @ 200 gpd/unit = 57,600 gpd Retail: 165,380 sf @ 10 gpd/100 sf = 16,538 gpd Restaurant: 1,089 seats @ 50 gpd/seat = 54,450d gP Community Center: 1,500 sf @ 10 gpd/sf = 150 gpd TOTAL = 128, 738 gpd ANTICIPATED AVERAGE DAILY SEWAGE FLOW Average Daily Flow Sewage Flow Average Flow (gpm) Peak Flow (gpm) Note: Peak Flow uses a peaking factor of 3.5 • = 128;738 gpd = 89.40 gpm =312.91 gpm 00` 188 V.� TABLE 3 BRICKELL MAINSTREET SOLID WASTE GENERATION Hotel: 288 rooms @ 8 lbs per unit per day Retail: 165,380 sf @ 4 lbs per 100 sf per day Restaurant: 32,000 sf @ 4 lbs per 100 sf per day Community Center: 1,500 sf @ 4 lbs per 100 sf per day = 2,304 lbs/day = 6,615 lbs/day = 1,280 lbs/day = 60 lbs/day TOTAL = 10,259 lbs/day Anticipated Solid Waste Generation = 5.13 tons/day = 5.13 Tons/day x 7 cu. yds./ton = 35.91 cu. yds./day • 0®— 188 • • 1-1 • BRICKELL CELEBRATING URBAN LIFESTYLES COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC IMPACT REPORT CITY OF MIAMI FLORIDA PREPARED BY CONSTRUCTA, INC. SUITE 302, 2665 SOUTH BAYSHORE DRIVE COCONUT GROVE, FLORIDA 33133 (305) 858 - 7749 ! Prepared by CONSTRUCTA Inc . ........................................... Go- 188 n BRICKELL 41 INDEX 0 Prepared by CONSTRUCTA Inc . ............................................ Page I 00— Iss EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW ................................ ................:..3 OBJECTIVE OF REPORT.....................................................6 BENEFITS TO THE CITY OF MIAMI ............................................ 6 PRIMARY BENEFITS: ....................................................6 SECONDARY BENEFITS: .................................................. 8 CONSTRUCTION BENEFITS: ............... ................................8 OPERATING BENEFITS: ..................................................9 TAX BENEFITS: ........................................................ 9 EMPLOYMENT AND WAGES: ..............................................9 BUSINESS, CONVENTIONS AND TOURISM:.. ................................. 10 TRANSPORTATION AND PARKING: ......................................... 10 RESIDENTIAL GROWTH:................................................10 NEIGHBORHOOD DISPLACEMENT: ......................................... 1 I SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS ............................................. 12 CONCLUSION...........................................................15 EXHIBIT.............................................................I6 EXHIBITII.............................................................17 EXHIBITIII............................................................18 EXHIBITIV ....................... ...................................19 EXHIBITV.............................................................20 EXHIBITVI ................................. .... ...................21 EXHIBITVII...........................................................22 EXHIBITVIII.............................................:.............23 0 Prepared by CONSTRUCTA Inc . ............................................ Page I 00— Iss BRICKELL d to BRICKELL SUMMARY OF BENEFITS COMMUNITY COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT RESIDENTIAL & BUSINESS SERVICES ECONONMIC GROWTH EMPLOYMENT WAGES TAXES ECONOMIC BUSINESS & CONVENTION GROWTH EXPANDING THE TOURISM BASE DINING & FOOD SALES RETAIL SALES & COMMERCIAL DIVERSITY TRANSPORTATION & PARKING RESIDENTIAL GROWTH Prepared by CONSTRUCTA Inc . ............................................. Page 2 BRICKELL EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW The Developer: BRICKELL is being developed as a venture between CONSTRUCTA INC., EMERSON FITTIPALDI and BRASILINVEST. Constructa, under its President Marc Pietri's leadership, has more than 30 years of international experience as a full services real estate company. Constructa's most notable development achievements in Miami are CocoWalk and Ocean Steps. Mr. Fittapaldi is world renown as a successful sports champion and businessman. His headquarters are located in the Brickell community. Brasilinvest represents investors whose commitment to this project speak to its location, quality and substance. Brasilinvest has structured and or concluded projects within the United States approaching $1 billion. Concept: This Report is an analysis of the universal impact created by the development of the next generation urban retail community known simply as "BRICKELL". Born of the idea that the needs and requirements of the people who reside in our urban neighborhoods must be complimented by not only the quality of goods and services offered, but an environment of wood, water and greenery. The marriage of environment and commerce with a sensitivity to the community wherein the project resides is reflected in the design, the implementation, of a concept to respond to the many facets of lifestyles contained within that community between the Miami River and Biscayne Bay known as Brickell. It is meant to compliment what has been with what can be as Miami enters the next millennia. With a future addition of a 300 -room moderately priced hotel tower on the back of the retail center, this project will then also fulfill the need of the transient business population. Such addition to the area will provide the transient business population an affordable and high quality corporate suite type hotel. Project Description: BRICKELL will be developed as two phases: the first phase is a two level lifestyle center of approximately 165,000 square feet; the second phase will consist of 300 -room moderately priced hotel operated by one of the largest international hotel operators. Located between 91n and 101 Street from 151 Avenue and Brickell Plaza the site consist of multiple parcels totaling +/- 4.5 acres. The center will have approximately 50 to 55 dining, retail and service merchants with emphasis on merchandise, goods and services related to the home and lifestyle. Retail "pavilions" are designed with terraces, patios, covered porticos and pedestrian friendly passages. Landscaping is a combination of trees, free flowing and manicured greenery, flowers, and shrubs and grassed areas. Water features are interspersed with cooling misters along sidewalks and walkways. The first 0 Prepared by CONSTRUCTA Inc . ............................................. Page 3 siucKELL • • phase comprises 990 car underground and above ground parking facilities, which will augment the metered spaces along the periphery. Service points are screened and limited in scope to provide necessary infrastructure. A combination of feature elevators, escalators and stairs interact with bridges and arcades allowing for sheltered and open spaces. Glass, wood and environmentally complimentary materials are to be used in construction to compliment merchant trade presentation. Architectural detailing is designed to have human scale creating an urban streetscape of shops and eateries. Rather than imposing "newness" the center, when finished, will appear to have been an integral part of historic Brickell and its people. The 300 -room corporate hotel is intended to be added to the back of the retail center in a future phase. The partnership anticipates start of construction in 2003. The intent of the Partnership is to provide a moderately priced hotel that would fill the current gap in the market for affordable business hotel rooms. Such hotel would be operated by one of the largest worldwide international hotel operators. Community Features: The Community Chapel is representative of the ownership's decision to develop a community based project. Placed within a pedestrian park it is,a low-density use placed in one of the most valuable section of real estate within the project. Its setting is meant to add depth to Allen Morris Park thus expanding the open space for families, residents and visitors to Brickell and Miami. The management of the Community Chapel will allow for community functions, private use, business presentations and entertainment. The wide array of uses will include weddings, wine tasting, business meetings, military reunions, embassy parties, press conferences, public meetings, library reading programs, speaker forums, art shows, garden clubs as well as lite music. Specialty film presentations including foreign films and offerings ranging from silent films to historically relevant and educational pieces are meant to provide an alternative for enjoyment and information. Additional features are intended to add to cultural enrichment through development of activities that appeal to the daily visitor - with particular attention to those who are especially gifted, but draw enjoyment from non impaired senses. Construction and Development: The first phase of the project is projected to include 19 to 21 months of construction beginning May 2000 with opening occurring between November and December 2001. Master construction will generate approximately 300 construction jobs with another 200 to 300 jobs sustained by merchant build outs. Indirect employment associated with finish, pre -opening preparations, marketing/advertising and promotions will be spread primarily to local contractors and service providers expanding the ripple effect of the development. The development team will add another level of employment of professionals within several companies. They will interact commercially with real estate Prepared by CONSTRUCTA Inca .................................. I ......... Page 4 0.0- x.88 i OW—MI brokerage firms, banks & lenders, insurance carriers, legal firms, architectural & engineering firms and professional services companies during the development phase. The second phase of the project is projected to last 24 months of construction anticipated to begin in 2003. An opening in the year 2005 can be envisioned. The construction of a 300 -room hotel will generate approximately 200 to 250 construction jobs. Indirect employment associated with finish, pre -opening preparations, marketing/advertising and promotions will be spread primarily to local contractors and service providers expanding the ripple effect of the development. The development team will add another level of employment of professionals within several companies. They will interact commercially with real estate brokerage firms, banks & lenders, insurance carriers, legal firms, architectural & engineering firms and professional services companies during the development phase. Economic and Tax Benefits: BRICKELL will add substantial capital infusion to the City of Miami. Generation of one time impact fees and taxes through development are the cornerstones for contribution to the annual well being of the City by direct and indirect benefits. These include taxes generated by special levy, ad valorem taxes, parking taxes and sales taxes. These contributions will assist the City in improving infrastructure and maintaining the quality of life for its citizenry. The ripple effect caused by increased commercial activity will be felt from the wholesale level by suppliers of goods, services and materials to project merchants to the intermediate economy of merchant employees and store owners to the tertiary economy that is the beneficiary of the profit and wages generated. Employment and Wages: Employment will be generated across the economic strata. From minimum wage to management to entrepreneurial ownership BRICKELL will offer every Miami resident an opportunity to participate in economic improvement. The quality of the retail, dining and service merchants assures better paying positions with great opportunities for advancement and increased personal income based upon skill, desire and perseverance. This cross section of opportunity is especially important in an urban setting where the demographic base demands all levels of enterprise in order to maintain an employment base within the community that is proximate to living quarters via public transportation, private vehicle or more importantly within walking distance. The addition of a 300 -room hotel will further increase the current employment base generated by the project. The targeting of one of the largest worldwide hotel operators will generate an opportunity for the local population for advancement and increased personal income based upon skill; desire and perseverance. Prepared by CONSTRUCTA Inc . ............................................ Page 5 � - ISS BRICKELL 40 0 Economic Growth: BRICKELL is an economic stimulus for co -development. By providing a basis of economic vitality it assists in stimulating other development that looks for indicators that justify risk and capital formation. The spectrum of opportunity for the City's growth includes residential towers, condominiums, hotels, offices, additional retail and commercial projects and regeneration of urban neighborhoods. Urban projects of quality and substance cause micro development within sharply defined geographic limits. Thus they create and maintain the income, employment and commercial vitality within high- density urban settings that draw less City services capacity than remote, distant or low- density development. It brings to fruition the Brickell redevelopment plan at the time and in the location that offers the greatest opportunity for the City of Miami to continue to expand its urban base thus assuring its position for generations as a City that looked inward and found the key that other Cities are in search of to assure all of its citizens a quality of life in an environment that is community - neighborhood based. OBJECTIVE OF REPORT The following Sections of this Report are to provide information on the benefits accruing to the City of Miami from the development of BRICKELL. The base assumptions and information will be reviewed by a professional services firm and an opinion and supplemental report will be forthcoming. 10 BENEFITS TO THE CITY OF MIAMI PRIMARY BENEFITS: The Primary benefits to the City of Miami can be measured by immediacy of return to the community in the form of tangible economic enhancement wherein monies are spent generating economic activity within the City. These economic contributors over the 20 month development period are, but are not limited to: Predevelopment Phase (past and on going) Project formation: Acquisition expenses generating exchange of capital and employment within firms associate with project. Capital formation: Packaging and use of services related to project formation, employment within lender and associated professional services firms, legal firms and research companies. 0 Prepared by CONSTRUCTA Inc . ............................................ Page 6 00- ISO BRICKELL Land formation: Fees, brokerage commissions, deposits and payments. Employment within services firms for survey and professional contracts, soil testing and boring, structure stabilization and or demolition, legal services and public employment related to issues involving governmental oversight and or input. Due diligence: Architectural, engineering, legal and services firms. Project Implementation: Leasing, travel, marketing, brokerage, legal and architectural services. Development Phase Continuation of economy: All Predevelopment costs continue in some form or capacity throughout the process. Public Phase: Legal, architectural and professional services. Public employment in agencies involved in development processes, permitting and enforcement. Construction: Owner and Tenant contractors, suppliers, vendors, architectural firms, legal firms, professional services firms, laborers and crafts persons involved in construction. Machinery and equipment suppliers, associated product manufacturers and contractors providing finish products and services related to tenant construction. Public Fees: Impact and other taxes, fees and service costs levied by governmental authority. Pre -opening Phase: Employment: Ownership employment of project employees for managing, marketing and operating the project. Tenant employment of staff. Service Providers: Advertising, promotion and providers of goods and services related to the finish and opening of the project including decor, landscape, furniture, fixture and equipment providers and entertainers. Opening Phase: Prepared by CONSTRUCTA Inc . ............................................. Page 7 • BRICKELL Service Providers: Parking and valet services firms. Security, cleaning, painting, trash removal and sundry providers. Vendor Providers: Food purveyors and wholesalers, wholesalers of retail merchandise, advertisers, paper products and packaging firms, insurance companies, electronics and communications companies, banks, hotel and restaurant services and other agencies and professional services related to the close out of construction and opening of the project. Hospitality Services: All direct employees of hotel as well as tourism & convention related industry providers such as: Travel Agents, Airlines staff, Transportation services. Prepared by CONSTRUCTA Inc . ............................................ Page 8 BRICKELL SECONDARY BENEFITS: Secondary benefits that accrue to the City of Miami are established as those enterprises or activities that are created or contributed to by the Primary Benefits infusion of direct capital into the local economy. The Secondary benefits are, but not limited to: Hotels: Room stays generated by development construction and or merchant activity. Restaurants: Meals generated by the entire range of activity directly or indirectly associated with the development processes. Car Rentals: Rentals associated with transient persons associated with the development. Travel Related: Economic activity caused by transit through air or land transportation. Residential: Long term housing for construction and other transient persons. Permanent housing for relocated persons to Miami for merchant operations. Residential housing for local employees and those hired by the project who move up or improve housing due to increased income. Food & Services: Full spectrum from grocery stores, gas stations, entertainment and other retail offerings in addition, to medical, financial, car dealerships and normal life processes expenditures from income generated by direct or indirect income generated by the development of the project. Taxes: The general increase in sales and other taxes by the ripple effect of income generated from the project through the economy. CONSTRUCTION BENEFITS: The first phase of the project will generate $63.9 million for site,prep and construction for the master construction of the project. An additional $21.55 million will be generated by Merchant construction and finish of tenant spaces. These two areas will sustain approximately 400 construction jobs with primary employment being of local trades persons and specialists. This will generate an estimated $11.23 million in wages. Assuming the wages earned will generate 2.0 ripples in the local economy as that income is subsequently spent by wage earners the minimum gross benefit to the economy from wages alone for on- site construction would be $22.46 million. The second phase of the project will generate $72.5 million for site prep and construction for the master construction of the project. This will sustain approximately 200 to 250 construction jobs with primary employment being of local trade's persons and specialists. This will generate an estimated $6.0 million in wages. Assuming the wages earned will Prepared by CONSTRUCTA Inc . ............................................ Page 9 0- 188 BRICKELL a • generate 2.0 ripples. in the local economy as that income is subsequently spent by wage earners the minimum gross benefit to the economy from wages alone for on-site construction would be $12.0 million. OPERATING BENEFITS: Upon completion of the first phase the estimated 50 to 55 retailers and restaurants will generate approximately 728 jobs. This will generate annual wages of $14.35 million. Project Operating Staff is estimated to be 35 with annual wages of $851,000. Gross Sales are estimated to be $67.4 million in the first year. This will generate $4.9 million in sales taxes. Operation of the center is estimated to be $1.72 million the first year which is paid directly to service providers, utilities, security companies, parking firms, advertising and marketing firms within the local economy. They in turn generate employment and taxes related to their ventures. This does not estimate community value enhancement by the internal operations of retailers and restaurants, which should equal the operating budget. Upon completion of the second phase the 300 -room corporate hotel will generate approximately 160 part-time and full-time positions. This will generate annual wages of $3.8 million. Gross Sales are estimated to be $24.5 million in the first year. This will generate $1.6 million in sales and $1.47 in Hotel taxes. Operation of the hotel is estimated to be $7.35 million the first year which is paid directly to service providers, utilities, security companies, parking firms, advertising and marketing firms, travel agents and reservation systems operators within the local, state wide and national economy. They in turn generate 'employment and taxes related to their ventures. This does not estimate community value enhancement by the internal operations of service providers that should equal the operating budget. TAX BENEFITS: The project will generate impact fees and taxes on a one-time basis during the development period. It is estimated that first phase will pay an estimated $957,222 in ad Valorem taxes in the first year of operations. The project assessment for special fees such as fire tax is yet to be estimated. The parking garage is estimated to be able to generate $400,000 in taxes based upon the recent 20% added tax implemented by the City in August 1999 on and estimated gross income of $2 million in parking receipts. The first phase of the project will generate one time impact fees estimated at approximately $750,000. The second phase will pay an estimated $1,542,191 in ad Valorem taxes in the first year of operations. The project assessment for special fees such as fire tax is yet to be estimated. The second phase of the project will generate one time impact fees estimated at approximately $405,000. 0 Prepared by CONSTRUCTA Inc . ........................................... Page 10 00- 188 BRICKELL i EMPLOYMENT AND WAGES: The project will generate benefit to the primary, secondary and tertiary levels of the economy by the generation and regeneration of spending caused by wages. The range of professional and other occupational skills within the project is outlined in Exhibits I, 11, VIII. BUSINESS, CONVENTIONS AND TOURISM: The project is primarily marketed and directed at the local resident and business population. However due to the quality of the dining and lifestyle stores it is felt that the. project will develop a significant transient business, convention and tourist trade. Based upon historical data for CocoWalk (developed by Constructa Inc.) the following can be extrapolated as to visitation projections the second year after opening. Business Related: 80,000 persons generating $3,600,000 in gross sales Convention Related: 70,000 persons generating $4,200,000 in gross sales Tourism Related: 48,000 persons generating $2,400,000 in gross sales Estimated Projected: Growth Markets 198,000 persons generating $10,200,000 in gross sales These markets will grow appreciably as the reputation and the marketing of the project increases its awareness to these component parts not within the primary focus of the project's consumer base. It is felt that this will grow by an estimated S% per year conservatively which is above and beyond the normal proforma projections for gross sales and patronage. It is believed that BRICKELL will become a significant offering and attraction to specialty visitors from Europe and South America and as a point of diversion for convention and business travelers. TRANSPORTATION AND PARKING: Metro & Loop System: The site is strategically located to take advantage of the metro and downtown loop system. The ownership is desirous of investigating how the ridership of these component people movers can be enhanced. To that end significant time and energy will be devoted to addressing interaction with municipal authority having jurisdiction over these two entities to investigate cooperative marketing and promotion strategies to increase these as conveyances to the Brickell corridor. Parking: The project will offer 990 parking spaces with a combination of valet and self park features. In addition the ownership will work with peripheral parking entities that are under utilized during evenings and weekends to increase visitorship and patronage to the Brickell corridor. 9 Prepared by CONSTRUCTA Inc . ........................................... Page I 1 BRICKELL • a RESIDENTIAL GROWTH: The development of BRICKELL will create a significant retail base to attract and maintain residential growth in the Brickell and adjacent residential corridors. It is expected that this will continue to help stabilize single family housing. It will cause increasing property values as these proximate areas will become more in demand as the commercial infrastructure offerings develop and improve. These homes should become increasingly attractive to young professional couples who desire an urban lifestyle with the convenience of access and transportation that an upscale urban setting offers. Mid level residential apartments and lower income housing should also stabilize and improve as residents gain economic advantage from the improving employment and compensation levels generated by BRICKELL and co -development. The BRICKELL project is of advantage to new projects such as the proposed Brickell Grand residential tower between 10`" and 11t' Streets under consideration. It assists them in marketing and increasing the level of income they generate while attracting upscale residents into the area. This trend is anticipated to continue. NEIGHBORHOOD DISPLACEMENT: Dwellings on the site are atypical small two bedroom frame residences. Many are already vacant, dilapidated and infested. They are primarily low rental and there is substantial vacancy at this time. They are not of historical value in nature. Grounds are matted and in need of care. In addition to antiquated frame dwellings there are a limited number of commercial buildings facing Miami Avenue that are entering the end of their potential lifespan. They are of no particular architectural quality. The retail and commercial uses will be replicated in the project and upgraded to meet current community standards. The existing commercial entities will be replaced by higher producing retailers and restaurants which will generate substantial improvement in tax yield. There is no appreciable population displacement caused by the project. As noted the residential dwellings are antiquated and have high vacancy rates at this time. 0 Prepared by CONSTRUCTA Inc . ................. *.......................... Page 12 010,— �.88 BRICKELL SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS The information contained within this Report reveals that substantive benefits are created for the City of Miami by the project. The economic indicators establish an immediate infusion into the local economy which will increase over the 20 month construction / development period. Notwithstanding the material benefits BRICKELL contributes on another level that may be far more important to the City. It maintains and compliments an historic neighborhood with a community-based approach to development. A conscious decision has been made by the developer to build into the project human scale, quality of life, improvements for the benefit of the residential base. BRICKELL brings together public interest and private development in order to establish a profitable commercial shopping center within community standards for quality, sensitivity to lifestyle and the desire to enhance the Brickell environment. GENERAL First Phase: Retail Center Additional Retail Stores 42 to 47 Additional Restaurants and Cafes 8 Parking spaces added to area 990 ' Additional Gross Sales to City $67,000,000 first year Enhanced convention /business/tourism to the Brickell area 198,000 Second Phase: 300 -room hotel Room Count 300 Additional Gross Sales to City $24,500,000 first year Enhanced convention /business/tourism to the Brickell area 219,000 EMPLOYMENT First Phase: Retail Center Master Construction +/- 300 over 18 to 21 months Tenant Construction +/- 200 to 300 over 6 months period Retail & Restaurant Employees +/- 728 permanent positions Prepared by CONSTRUCTA Inc . ........................................... Page 13 00- 188 • • BRICKELL Project Operating Staff Second Phase: 300 -room hotel Master Construction Project Operating Staff WAGES & INCOME First Phase: Retail Center Master & Tenant Construction Retail & Restaurant Employees Project Operating Staff Total Initial Wages & Income Second Phase: 300 -room hotel Master Construction Project Operating Staff Total Initial Wages & Income VALUE OF DEVELOPMENT First Phase: Retail Center Master Construction Tenant Construction Annual Operating Expenses Second Phase: 300 -room hotel Master Construction Annual Operating Expenses +/- 35 permanent positions +/- 250 over 30 months +/- 150 permanent positions +/- $11.23 million over development period +/- $14.35 million permanent annually +/- $85 million +/- $26.43 million +/- $6.0 million over development period +/- $3.8 million +/- $9.8 million +/- $63.90 million +/- $21.55 million +/- $1.72 million annually +/- $72.5 million +/- $7.35 million annually Prepared by CONSTRUCTA Inc . ............................................ Page 14 BiucxELL _1* • Prepared by CONST RUCTA Inc. ......................................... Page 15 - 188 TAXES & IMPACT FEES First Phase: Retail Center Ad Valorem Taxes +/- $ 957,222 first year Parking Garage Taxes +/- $ 400,000 first year Fire Service Levy +/- $ 30,000 (not yet assessed) Impact Fees +/- $ 750,000 Sales Taxes +/- $ 4,900,000 first year Total +/- $ 7,037,222 Second Phase: 300 -room hotel Ad Valorem Taxes +/- $ 1,542,191 first year Hospitality Taxes +/- $ 1,47.0,000 first year Fire Service Levy +/- $ 30,000 (not yet assessed) Impact Fees +/- $ 405,000 Sales Taxes +/- $ 1,600,000 Total +/- $ 5,047,191 Prepared by CONST RUCTA Inc. ......................................... Page 15 - 188 BRICKELL CONCLUSION BRICKELL is designed to be the next generation of urban enterprise. Its architectural features are designed to enhance the community rather than impose an artificial edifice contrary to community standards. The design is born of water, greenery and wood. Natural elements with environmental sensitivity. From entertainment to the Community Chapel the needs and requirements of the neighborhood are integrated as a part of the project's foundation. The principal of human scale. in an urban setting, is to provide a pedestrian friendly setting wherein families, businesspersons, visitors and the array of residents of Miami will feel welcome. The merchandising mix is planned to add quality and substance to the Cityscape. The size and range of stores and eateries will offer opportunity to entrepreneurs, introduction to Miami by international merchants, diversity in the dining offering and a selection of specialty stores not found in every "mall and streetcorner" of Miami. It is to be fresh, new and exciting. BRICKELL's focus on "lifestyle" adds a new niche to the Miami retail offering. Merchandise for home, office and yacht is complimented by upscale fashion interposed with a gourmet market and personal feature stores for sporting, activity and educational enrichment. The economic contribution of this type of project will assure Miami of a continuing increase in employment, tax base and retail expansion. The improvement in quality of life caused by generation of personal income will affect residential growth and neighborhood regeneration. City infrastructure will be assisted by a project that is actively involved and promoting of public transportation while offering additional parking in a critical growth corridor of the City. Community enrichment -economic contribution — commercial successes, the cornerstones of a City's structure are evidenced by BRICKELL. The Developer has gone to great length to assure that the aspirations of the City and Brickell Community are satisfied. BRICKELL is not a project of mere brick and mortar. It is a living entity that captures of the essence of the City of Miami in a very special setting to meet the needs of its citizenry in a celebration of lifestyle. Prepared by CONSTRUCTA Inc . ........................................... Page 16 Exhibit I ® • 1 of 1 Exhibit I BRICKELI— celebrating Urban Lifestyles ECONOMIC BENEFITS STUDY SUMMARY OF DIRECT ECONOMIC IMPACT PHASE I (RETAIL CENTER) GROSSEMPLOY WAGES TAX ES BEN EFITS........ MENT . :%X%�X ....... PRIMARY ... ...... .......... .. DEVELOPMENT ............. ................ S61790JI3 . .... ... $I 1.780mo 4 04 ......................... .......... $374,899 OPERATIONAL .......................... ........ .......... S1.720,000 S14.35000 ..... ............ .. ... 763 ... . . .... ......... ....... ........ 5957,222 TOTAL PRIMARY ............. . ........ ......... ...... 0,000 S65�5 10�513 $26,13 .. . ......... ...... ......... . 1, 167 .... $1332J21 ...... .... . . SECONDARY ..... ... .............. . DEVELOPMENTS 21,550 00 0 >........... X . ............ GROSS SALES IMPACT S672400000 IMPACT $22,460.000WAGES 22 460 $4,900.000 TOTAL INDIRECT ...... . .... 44 010 $22,460,000 <> >z54900.000 X TOTAL GROSS BENEFIr—S ........... 109,520,513 S487590,000 X -ow: . ............ 1,167 S6.232.121 ............... PHASE 11 (HOTEL) GROSS WAGES ..... . EMPLOY ES .......... BENEFITS . .... MENT ............. ... ............. PRIMARY ... . ..... DEVELOPMENTS72,500�000 .......... ................. . ... .......... S6,550,000 254 so OPERATIONAL S7,350 ,000 ......... . ...... 160 . ................ ....... .............. $1,542,191 ............. TOTAL PRIMARY $79,850,000 S67550,000:".:.:.:.::--.. . 4 ... X., ............ ....... $1,542,191 ............ . .......... . .. SECONDARY ..... ......... . ......... ... ... ............ ................ ............... .............. . ................ DEVELOPMENT $o .............. ......... .... .............. ...... . ......... GROSS SALES IMPACTS24,500,000 .. ... ... . WAGES IMPACT $127000,000 $12.000 000 7 S3.0 0,000 TOTAL INDIRECT S12,000,000..' S12,000,000 ............... .................. »> ........ ......... .............. ......................... ...................... 53,070,000 ............ — TOTAL GROSS BENEFIJ........................ S 9 1, 8 5 0, 0 0 0 S 18,550,000 ................ : ............... .................... ........................ 414 ............. ............... .......... ............. S4,612,191 1 of 1 Exhibit 11 • 0 PROGRAM PHASE %IENT PHASE COST OF LAND CONSTRUCTION AND RELATED CC MARKETING COSTS FINANCING COST OPERATIONS PHASE TOTAL DIRECT BENEFITS 0 Exhibit II BRICKELL- celebrating Urban Lifestyles ECONOMIC BENEFITS STUDY SUMMARY OF DIRECT ECONOMIC BENEFITS PHASE I (RETAIL CENTER) ........... ...... NUMBER of WAGES EMPOYEES $11,230,000 4 $550,000 404 311.780, 000 728 . .............. S14,350,000:", 1,132 PHASE II (HOTEL) NUMBER of?'>ff?`>'`?� OPERATIONS PHASE 160 $3,800,000 TOTAL DIRECT BENEFITS 414 $10350,000 ............. ......... ... ... 0 $10,00%055 $44,235.400 $4.402332 $5.143.326: 363,790,513 $1.720,000 $65,510,513: $7,000,000 $54.900,000 $4,900,004 $5,700,000 $72,500,000 AD VALOREM TAXES $374,899 3374,899 $1,332,121 AD VALOF so $1.542.191 51,542,191 00— Iss 1 of 1 Exhibit III i • TOTAL DEVELOPMENT PHASE 572,500,000 ': 0.9664 OPERATIONAL PHASE S7,350,000: >>''<?''>> 0.9664 TOTAL INDIRECT BENEFITS • COMPUTED INDIRECT BENEFIT $9,672,751 $15,062,553 $36,911,848 $61,647,152 S63,309,360 COMPUTED INDIRECT $6,764,800 $17,491,840 $45,807,360 570,064,000 57,103,040 577,167,040 Q®- 188. 1of1 Exhibit IV Exhibit BRICKELL- celebratingg Urban Lifestyles ECONOMIC BENEFITS STUDY PROJECT DEVELOPNIENT COST U 0_ 188 loft PFLASE I (RETAIL CENTER) PROJECT DEVELOPMENT COSTS TYPE OF COST SPENT :! AMOUNT IN DAD E HARD COST: LAND (incl. Land related costs)100°/ $10.009,055 BASE BUILDING / PARKING 100% $23,795.724 SITE PREPARATION 100% $1,359,918 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENTS 100% $1,500,000 TENANT ALLOWANCES100% $6,950,307 ARCHITECT & CONSULTANTS 100% $2,679,008 CONTINGENCIES 100% $1,910,249 TOTAL HARD COSTS 100% $48,204,261 BUDGETED SOFT COSTS (including Impact and Permit Fees) 100 % S6040193 PROJECT COST BEFORE FLNIANCLYG & MARKETING 100% $54-144,455 MARKETING COSTS 100% i $4,402,732 FINANCING COST: FINANCING COSTS AND FEES100°/ $2,525,818 INTEREST 100% $2,617,509 TOTAL FINANCING COST 100% '.: 55,143 326 TOTAL PROJECT COST 100% $63,790,513 PHASE 11 (HOTEL) PROJECT DEVELOPMENT COSTS* TYPE OF COST /O AMOUNT SPENT :'' HARD COST: AIR RIGHTS 100°/ $7,000,000 BASE BUILDING / PARKING 100% $30,450,000 SITE PREPARATION 100% $0 FF&E 100°/ $4,500,000 M ENVIRONENTAL 11APROVEMENTS 100% $500,000 ARCHITECT & CONSULTANTS 100% ? $3,000,000 CONTINGENCIES 100% ` $8,950,000 TOTAL HARD COSTS 100% iXwX$54,400,000 BUDGETED SOFT COSTS (including Impact and Permit Fees) 100% $7,500,000 PROJECT COST BEFORE FINANCING & MARKETING 100%?' $61,900,000 PRE -OPENING & MARKETING COSTS 100`/0 $4,900,000 FINANCING COST: FINANCING COSTS AND FEES 100%$2,700,000 INTEREST 100% $3,000,000 TOTAL FINANCING COST 100% `: $5,700,000 TOTAL PROJECT COST 100% S72500,000 `Development of the Hotel is at preliminary stage and all figures provided are based on assumptions'' ' U 0_ 188 loft Exhibit V • Exhibit !% BRICKELL- celebrating Urban Lifestyles ECONOMIC BENEFITS STUDY COMPUTATION OF AD VALOREM TAXES PHASE I (RETAIL CENTER) AD V DESCRIPTION REAL ESTATE PROPERTY DEVELOPED PROJECT ESTIMATED V: NfILLAGE TAX RATE COMPUTED R/E TAX LAND TAXES COMPUTATION 1999 €€ 2001 & k'; :::::;::I A • PHASE lI (HOTEL) AD VALOREM TAXES CONfP11'rATrnN* 531,500,000 512,337,062 30.3880 -uevetopment or me Hotel is at prelmLnary stage and all tigures provided are based on assumptions. 1 of 1 01® 188 • • Exhibit VI • Exhihit VI BRICKELL- celebrating Urban Lifestyles ECONOMIC BENEFITS STUDY ALLOCATION OF AD VALOREM TAXES C, PHASE I (RETAIL CENTER) AD VALOREM TAXES ALLOCATION APPLICABLE ONE TIME ANNUAL DESCRIPTION MILLAGE TAXES TAY TAYFc TAX City of Miami Operating 10.0000 $12337,062 $123,371 $31.500.000 $315.000 City of Miami Miscellaneous 0.5000 $12,337,062 $6,169 $31,500,000 $15,750 School Operating 9.1820 $12.337,062 $113,279 $31,500,000 $289,233 Dade County Operating 6.0230 $12,337,062 $74,306 $31,500,000 $189,725 City of Miami Debt 1.7900 $12.337.062 $22,083 $31,500,000 $56,385 Dade County Debt 0.8370 $12.337,062 $10,326 $31,500,000 $26,366 South Fla. Water Management 0.5970 $12.337,062 $7,365 $31,500,000 $18.806 Library Operating 0.3340 $12,337,062 $4,121 $31,500,000 $10,521 School Debt 0.9780 $12,337,062 $12,066 $31,500,000 $30,907 Fla. Inland Navigation District 0.0470 $12,337,062 5580 $31,500,000 $1,481 Environmental Projects 0.1000 $12,337,062 $1,234 $31,500,000 $3.150 TOTAL 30.3880 $12,337,062 $374.899 $31,500,000 $957,222 PHASE II (HOTEL) AD VALOREM TAXES ALLOCATION" APPLICABLE ONE TIME ANNUAL DESCRIPTION MILLAGE TAXES TAX TAYFC TAX City of Miami Operating 10.0000 N/A N/A $50,750,000 $507,500 City of Miami Miscellaneous 0.5000 N/A N/A $50,750,000 525,375 School Operating 9.1820 N/A N/A $50,750,000 $465,987 Dade County Operating 6.0230 N/A N/A $50,750,000 $305,667 City of Miami Debt 1.7900 N/A N/A $50,750,000 $90,843 Dade County Debt 0.8370 N/A N/A $50,750,000 $42,478 South Fla. Water Management 0.5970 N/A N/A $50,750,000 $30,298 Library Operating 0.3340 N/A N/A $50,750,000 516,951 School Debt 0.9780 N/A N/A $50,750,000 $49,634 Fla. Inland Navigation District 0.0470 N/A N/A $50,750,000 $2,385 Environmental Projects 0.1000 N/A N/A $50,750,000 $5,075 TOTAL 30.3880 N/A N/A $50,750,000 $1,542,191 Development of the Hotel is at preliminary stage and all figures provided are based on assumptions. Go- 188 1of1 Exhibit VII • • • Exhibit VII BRICRELL- celebrating Urban Lifestyles ECONOMIC BENEFITS STUDY ALLOCATION OF IMPACT AND OTHER FEES rnA�t t 1 ttt g ter. �tiv g trcl IMFAC I ANU U I HEK ttEN ALLUCAI1ON 561,337 A. Development Square Footages: Square Footage I Total gross building area 195.880 2 Maxuntun development area (FAR) 195,880 3 Gross Leasing ,Area 175,500 4 Gross parking area 335,881 B. Impact Fees Amount 1 Dade County School Impact Fee SO 2 City of Miarni Development Impact Fee (Ord. 10426) $273,840 3 City of Miarni Development Impact Admin, Fee S8,215 4 Downtown Development Supplemental Fee (Ord. 10461) S135,928 S417,983 TOTAL OF ALL IMPACT FEES C. Non -Impact Fees I Miami Dade W.A.S.A. "connection fees" 561,337 2 Building Permit Fee 5106,352 3 Variance Fee S56,539 4 Installation Energy Fee $53,176 5 Re -plat (legal and Survey) SO 6 Major Use Special Permit Application Fee $14,691 7 Dade County Code Compliance S27,200 8 Radon Gas Fee S2,659 9 Fire Plan Review Fee S5,052 10 Ground Cover Fee 51.804 1I Land Use/Zoning S1.804 12 Zoning Review for Building Permit Fee - S60 13 Certificate of Occupancy Fee 5250 14 Application Fee S35 5330,960 TOTAL OF ALL NON -IMPACT FEES TOTAL OF ALL FEES FOR PHASE 1 5748,943 rrlANt Il hU t tL 1MFAU1 ANU U 1 HEK rbbN ALLOCATION A. Development Square Footages: Square Footage 1 Total gross budding area 197,560 2 Maximum development area (FAR) 197,560 3 Gross Leasing Area N/A 4 Gross parking area - 68,000 B. Impact Fees 'Amount 1 Dade County School Impact Fee SO 2 City of Miami Development Impact Fee (Ord. 10426) 5276,189 3 City of Miami Development Impact Admin. Fee S8,286 4 Downtown Development Supplemental Fee (Ord. 10461) S19,361 5303,835 TOTAL OF ALL IMPACT FEES C. Non -Impact Fees: 1 Miami Dade W.A. S.A. "connection fees" SO 2 Building Permit Fee 553,112 3 Variance Fee SO 4 Installation Energy Fee S26,556 5 Re -plat (legal and Survey) SO 6 Major Use Special Permit Application Fee 514,817 7 Dade County Code Compliance SO 8 Radon Gas Fee $1,328 9 Fire Plan Review Fee 52,523 10 Ground Cover Fee SO 11 Land Use/Zoning 50 12 Zoning Review for Building Permit Fee $60 13 Certificate of Occupancy Fee $250 14 Application Fee S35 TOTAL OF ALL NON -IMPACT FEES $98,681 TOTAL OF ALL FEES FOR PHASE 11 5402,516 00-188 1 of 1 EXHIBIT VIII *CKELL PROJECT OPERATIONS PERS EL PHASE I (RETAIL) General,1lanager Marketing Director 1 1 $ 55,000 $ 37,500 Operations Manager 1 $ 32,500 Maintenance Personnel 2 $ 40,800 Housekeeping Personnel 12 $ 183,600 Parking Garage Manager 1 $ 45,000 Valet / Parking Personnel 16 $ 244,800 Secretary/Receptionist 1 $ 16,000 Security Personnel 12 $ 195,840 PHASE II (HOTE GeneralManager 1 $ 150,000 Director of Sales 1 $ 120,000 Director of Operations 1 $ 120,000 Director of Human Ressources 1 $ 120,000 F&B Outlet Manager 1 $ 80,000 Sales Manager 3 $ 165,000 Administrative Assistant 4 $ 132,000 Revenue Manager 1 $ 55,000 Chief Engineer 1 $ 48,000 Engineers5 $ 190,000 Chief Concierge 1 $ 60,000 Controller 1 $ 55,000 Payroll Manager 1 $ 42,000 Concierge 1 $ 40,000 Sales Administration 6 $ 198,000 Reservations 5; $ 150,000 Human Ressources Assistant 2 $ 66,000 General Cashier 2 $ 74,000 Accounts Payable 2 $ 66,000 Accounts Receivable 2 $ 66,000 Cutest Services Agent 6 $ 90,000 Mght Audit 3 $ 33,000 Front Office Manager 1 $ 55,000 Assistant Front Office Manager 1 $ 35,000 Laundry Supervisor 1 $ 40,000 Executive Housekeeper 1 $ 35,000 Assistant Exec. Housekeeper 1 $ 20,000 Laundry Workers 8 $ 88,000 Banquet Manager 1 $ 60,000 Assistant Banquet Manager 1 $ 39,000 Executive Chef 1 $ 70,000 Sous Chef 1 $ 50,000 Cooks 9 $ 180,000 Housekeepers 20 $ 200,000 Dishwashers 3 $ 33,000 Housemen 10 $ 150,000 Bartenders 6 $ 66,000 Bellman 4 $ 60,000 Doormen 4 $ 44,000 Hostess Receiver 6 1 $ $ 90,000 18,000 Banquet Waiter 5 $ 55,000 Banquet Housemen 4 $ 48,000 Room Services Waiter 10 $ 100,000 Security 10 $ 120,000 0 KI wi FrA%R6BOn[[� Q p R/w LFC R/w LaE IS' 2S' REE iRlXa( .`� sly — �COOCTWrr[•�- (-muni`. 1Q,' •�•MNE[ '/ / y,ST[ ,/ •' �� 651.15' ISEAS> `� c3 `-/ — 4.4.L. - — — — — — s — — — ti— — — M.M.L. ��- - — — �n. D v ?. I` 7 -— — — — 4_ — —: S.W.10th STREET Si""° wM¢E I i:r�E[Li D I LOCATION MAP eor[. RMC urS�bGefa Mo Epya-F[p, C[Gw(te; 4C YaQ ' PD. -TECH ENGINEERING. INC. FN - 30 15 0 30 60 90 ❑ ' - ORAPHrC SCALE jrr!i/!Y`IsQLeJ• c MIR 14 C PARK E COMMERCE 3141 COMMERCE PARKWAY mIwEO 9 rtlD SUML1. °avSitF(°r (.vtEfii rL ao eer ,csf.,q. rM( n+nt efMaOf ro. /arta .wfns FnE wos sore MttrDn —� MIRAMAR• FLORIDA 33025 (954)-438-4300---- FAX.438-1433 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 1 ALL OF LOTS 1. 2. 3• A AND 5, THE NORTH 50.0 FEET OF LOT S. TOGETHER WITH LOT 9. j — — — M.M.L. — — —=•�65L3J' , BLOCK 72-5 OF 'CITY OF MIAMI'. ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF. AS RECORDED IN • ir/ L-rZ.A3' '3 D -q5• 4'ZI ' II PLAT BOOK 'B'. PAGE 41 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY. FLORIDA. gra '_• SET OAP •i SET == — — ..c_ — — MN.L. LESS AND EXCEPT THE FOLLOWING: SroRv s3.r L8 •e.v'. .THE EXTERNAL AREA OF A CIRCULAR CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF SEVEN (7) FEET AND sa.rr. 3a TANGENTS WHICH ARE 25 FEET SOUTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE CENTERLINE OF 6 -r 50' reDrfssnaa suR[•era wrD ea•r'[n n[.swv sr.Tf or rtWn[ oava eMs[�s[t o, . r [aesfD 5uv MD e.•rfr S.E• 9TH STREET ANO 37.5 FEET WESTERLY OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE CENTERLINE sw.wi - [rte OF S.E. IST AVENUE.BEING A PORTION OF LOT 3. BLOCK 72-S OF SAID -'CITY OF MIAMI'. 00 - - ACCORDING TO THE PUT THEREOF. AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 'B'.PAGE 41 OF THE SCCM°.L, .6 PUBLIC RECORDS OF MI AM[-0ADE COUNTY. FLORIDA. l - . Ewczr6'.:> _� • TOGETHER WITH: -Y �)'+ �`!. •� Y _ r..I.. oi3,M. ALL OF LOTS 1 THROUGH 9 INCLUSIVE. AND THE EAST 54.5 FEET Of LOT 15. TOGETHER" WITH LOTS 16 THROUGH 24 NCLUSIVE. BLOCK 71-5 CITY OF MIAMI'. ACCORDING TO THE 'B' \'ce • a •� PLAT THEREOF. AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK AT PAGE 41 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS ` FOR THE SPECIFIC PURPOSE OF SHOWING CERTAIN INFORMATION. 'T OF MIAMI-DnDE COUNTY. FLORIDA. ALL CONCRETE AND ASPHALT PARKING, WALKWAYS AND SLABS ARE NOT cocc: SAID LANDS SITUATED IN THE CITY OF MIAMI. COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE. FLORIDA SHOWN. ALL STRUCTURES SHOWN HEREON ARE GRAPHIC REPRESENTATIONS, BLOCK S AND NOT TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION OR DESIGN, AS THEY WERE NOT SURVEYED I ,.� FOR THAT USE. bid - THE LAST DATE OF THIS FIELD SURVEY : 10/4/99 FrA%R6BOn[[� Q p R/w LFC R/w LaE IS' 2S' REE iRlXa( .`� sly — �COOCTWrr[•�- (-muni`. 1Q,' •�•MNE[ '/ / y,ST[ ,/ •' �� 651.15' ISEAS> `� c3 `-/ — 4.4.L. - — — — — — s — — — ti— — — M.M.L. ��- - — — �n. D v ?. I` 7 -— — — — 4_ — —: S.W.10th STREET Si""° wM¢E I i:r�E[Li D I LOCATION MAP eor[. RMC urS�bGefa Mo Epya-F[p, C[Gw(te; 4C YaQ ' PD. -TECH ENGINEERING. INC. FN ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ jrr!i/!Y`IsQLeJ• c MIR 14 C PARK E COMMERCE 3141 COMMERCE PARKWAY mIwEO 9 rtlD SUML1. °avSitF(°r (.vtEfii rL ao eer ,csf.,q. rM( n+nt efMaOf ro. /arta .wfns FnE wos sore MttrDn —� MIRAMAR• FLORIDA 33025 (954)-438-4300---- FAX.438-1433 [°r(. FMa esntYNr a rnf rgY[R]r ar [vsDcrta+ f=EEA t -- — +Dr et ,TfrrraefD o oat of w rAv .+Fna/r —El rfa te°rt(necuc � j — — — M.M.L. — — —=•�65L3J' , iIEAS, — • ir/ L-rZ.A3' '3 D -q5• 4'ZI ' 4 FIA ORILL 5o 50- FNO 112 PIPE gra '_• SET OAP •i SET == — — ..c_ — — MN.L. SroRv s3.r L8 •e.v'. �tT'� sa.rr. 3a TREE 6 -r 50' reDrfssnaa suR[•era wrD ea•r'[n n[.swv sr.Tf or rtWn[ oava eMs[�s[t o, . r [aesfD 5uv MD e.•rfr s. sw.wi rwr..c .o, [rte ,S.W.9th 00 DADE (RUNTY �:a=•-[ SCCM°.L, .6 l \ . ry . Ewczr6'.:> _� • _ .s. -Y �)'+ �`!. •� Y _ r..I.. oi3,M. FOUND sie I? \'ce • a •� ; ` / �!,a 'T FND RR/w 172 cocc: BLOCK S ,.� bid - s 30 v w°co so r.o so. K en •r san o.t �. e,oRv n pq 5'RADIUS (�: <.,.v•` p J s°. rr. ] 2 r c.s.i r"I I�• j �, so. rr.. ase _/ r•o noa]a c.e.s. �3C 3 8 7 6 5 � 4 .mac». • 2 1 ' RDIUS�'RADUS 25A •-,• ; / i • i FrA T/ b � Ei a IP MAE rwE. ra[ L DISK 185.68' fYl - R/w LmE Nu.L. S.E.10th T EET---'-' .j' £ Z w DADE COUNTY (PB. B PG. 41) "` °" - m a D t erDe. SD.r.. m us •+, .r..as � � 8 vw L..ri 50.00' "" "" 50.00' ... .... a5.00' 3i BLOC S 71 9 U) .om rant =ego iv - -Cc c O O <Aleru O r10 Sr CR. [„ 16 17 18 19 20 21 r. 22 24 25' RADIUS yy - .y o °°"w T . nn Fn0 /R CM CHOPnORREDR- D- SET I/R C LB• 352] •56'47" FrA%R6BOn[[� Q p R/w LFC R/w LaE IS' 2S' REE iRlXa( .`� sly — �COOCTWrr[•�- (-muni`. 1Q,' •�•MNE[ '/ / y,ST[ ,/ •' �� 651.15' ISEAS> `� c3 `-/ — 4.4.L. - — — — — — s — — — ti— — — M.M.L. ��- - — — �n. D v ?. I` 7 -— — — — 4_ — —: S.W.10th STREET Si""° wM¢E I i:r�E[Li D I LOCATION MAP eor[. RMC urS�bGefa Mo Epya-F[p, C[Gw(te; 4C YaQ ' PD. -TECH ENGINEERING. INC. A efCYt3CelY4T o1 OewrArlfLS d ro FK Gflt](etII 0• TIt "°"44MrIE0[DM[&Flt p.,wu F°fa3f[t"i KMISG•.Y.yT6e:e uE=M£YMF A alCKer3 M _CONSUL CONSULTING ENGINEERS • LAND PLANERS a LANG SURVEYORS #T °rnfe •unrs d Remmrra emrwtvr a rrcex rD REFaCT r°4rr or( lA¢tf rz[n snore u rn[ q(rfl[E•¢3 nHMf jrr!i/!Y`IsQLeJ• c MIR 14 C PARK E COMMERCE 3141 COMMERCE PARKWAY mIwEO 9 rtlD SUML1. °avSitF(°r (.vtEfii rL ao eer ,csf.,q. rM( n+nt efMaOf ro. /arta .wfns FnE wos sore MttrDn —� MIRAMAR• FLORIDA 33025 (954)-438-4300---- FAX.438-1433 [°r(. FMa esntYNr a rnf rgY[R]r ar [vsDcrta+ f=EEA t -- — +Dr et ,TfrrraefD o oat of w rAv .+Fna/r —El rfa te°rt(necuc LOCATION MAP SRER PD. NOT TO SCALE O AL�{y \\V� ��jL�]1 TRICKELLWALK z —� CHECKED BY, ECK D 3 � J DATE, A/OS199 sl. IM.SP Mru YMwE[ ..s .� ^ �10.M,E� orot ) ,4 /. cwacrE YSr/ • ir/ L-rZ.A3' '3 D -q5• 4'ZI ' 4 FIA ORILL 5o 50- FNO 112 PIPE gra '_• SET OAP •i SET PROJECT Ma 9904// /0' SroRv s3.r L8 5 •e.v'. � e sa.rr. 3a STUFF +c.a. 6 reDrfssnaa suR[•era wrD ea•r'[n n[.swv sr.Tf or rtWn[ oava eMs[�s[t o, . r [aesfD 5uv MD e.•rfr s. sw.wi rwr..c .o, •. Z) 00 DADE (RUNTY �:a=•-[ ,� (PB B P G 41) :.:IZC . Ewczr6'.:> oi3,M. Z 172 cocc: BLOCK S ,.� bid - s 30 v w°co so r.o so. K en •r san o.t �. e,oRv n (�: <.,.v•` p J r"I I�• r —`�`,, � ccMrM,tii :[sr^[av .mac». • f25 ' RDIUS�'RADUS 25A •-,• ; / i • i FrA T/ b � Ei a IP MAE rwE. ra[ L DISK 185.68' fYl - R/w LmE Nu.L. S.E.10th T EET---'-' F.B. PD. O AL�{y \\V� ��jL�]1 TRICKELLWALK z CHECKED BY, ECK D 3 DATE, A/OS199 ' PROJECT Ma 9904// TYPE, 5 WE, S/eam t.5�w �. � „t SC•Yu•[ Ma "t SHEET SPECIFIC PURPOSEYJAVEY 6 reDrfssnaa suR[•era wrD ea•r'[n n[.swv sr.Tf or rtWn[ oava eMs[�s[t o, . r [aesfD 5uv MD e.•rfr 00 188 0 0 0 ((�?'1 Cirdit LA, nto n Aliemi [X velopment Authoeity - 1.9.9.9 • • • Miami Vicinity Ovdit A,u ifa) n Aliaerri LkvellpmentAuthority - 1.999 • • 0 0 0 Br*lckell District Credit Downtown Miami LYvelopmentAuthonty- /.9.9.9 • ' llmlmffl® B E A M E ----- ---- - ---------- -- ARCHITECTURAL - - - --- - --------- - PARTNERSHIP Eg a iiim�"i I =-s I i=i I I I I FAM I'mo-....". B I A M E ARCHITECTURAL PARTNERSHIP a 0 0 F C N I J a f N t Y N 0 • L Qend ' (� Large Canopy Trees 1 S' Height/7' Clear Trunk rVV Existing Trees to Remain. VerticallColumnar Trees 10'-12' Height x � Specimen/Specialty Trees 8'-10' Height 2 Flowering/Accent Trees . 8'-10' Height j4 Large Palms 12'-14' Height 3 Accent Palms 8'-10' Height > Shrubs and Groundcovers I'-3' Height °88 Landscape Pots Grass/Lawn Areas 4 4 Note: All landscape plan! materials shall be Florida Grade One or better and to comply with appropriate Cip• of Miami Codes. Note: All landscaped areas to be covered 100% br an automatic Irrigation ` system equipped with min sensors and to comply — appropriate CIO of - s N i�0'S?It>4 �" OiT* SST Da:31trKt I�CXt{`�I r3 / ��7(5TR'14�Z-q—"G�FaK Miami Codes. I eglC vae-nl'i� Z4" MK ad � is I I I I I I • • n0 N• 8 — t2- - I I - aTm.✓®-% ID T I IgE - a— y Tx 1 z_-�/ _ Syp {may fi ,so p�E rnll�r I I E7m'�IIIIL iw I Bal I C1S I I I i59! 155 I� v®FWrE I 6� I 1� 1 �• --�ri0 I I � I e>r� I 156 I / , 6 _ W-3 9 I� Q� °� I ' e I OEM 147 Z- 1> I� I, s C 6 I 1 41 ` to ODT 117b3 1 I I _I� / t •. -_j ° TTM li4 ® 141 4- _—.T_-� 69 1 167 � i � I� • � � f / 62 T' I2 103 a'-- I D 104 / 52 �-- I 61 I I I I I I N °— 51®---r'_9 -�- 6� --1----1--- -TWE 1w IrI 55111-� 6o I I I 1 1 I 4a�� 141 45t ro To I �� TelI I BI 1 5T I 1 I I I 7 _ r -�- _ 42 t 7 ;� 46 --41 - �- - 7/� s � Jj Z. MI rnI ABASE LINE I ° — Fx6ling Tree Designation Summary 20 15" Pine Rrnwve 47 12" Oak Renton 74 24" Oak Remain 140 15" Oak Remain 167 21" Oak Remove 21 15" Mae Rmmwr 48 24" Oak Remove 75 40" Oak Remain lel 12" Guars Remover 168 /8" 10.k Rdac an to be r dar Tera designated to be Modred 22 10" Pier Remove 49 60" Unkrtovn Remove 76 48" Pdm Remove 142 12" Guay. Ronov169 12^ Mango Remove an m n greMrd to Owner Park or anorka faambn adrredmby Owner and 0B: JJ 7" Mme Rrwwve SO 12" Oak Rdadtr 77 12" Palin Remove 143 6" 6Lava Remove 170 16^ Mango Remora. 24 40" P6rt Remove SI 24" Patin Remove 78 12" Pd. Remo III 12" Palm Remove 171 48^ IfInkuwaien Remove Note: The Survey by dkene 2S S" Palm Remover 52 12" Oak Rdotnle 79 12" Palm Remove 145 11^ Unknown Remove 172 60^ amdRan Pine R- 26 S" Pub. Remove 53 12" Oak Relocate oe 12" Pine Remove 146 I" 1Aad. Rea - 0 — c se 27 S" 1111alm Remove SI 6"[Palm Remover 81 12" lHae Remove 1 147 1 24" Oak Remain 28 6^ lPalm Remove 55 13" Oak Relocate 82 13" Mme Remove 14 1 12" Gumbo Umbo Remove 2 18" Royal Pdndana Remove 29 S^ Pdm Remove 56 24" Oak Remo 83 12" Plan Remove 119 1 12" IGumbo limbo Remove 3 33" Royal Poladana Rumor 30 6" Palm Remove 57 13" Unknown Remove 84 11" Pine Runout ISO /8^ Oak Remain I 18" Oak Remove- 3l 15^ Pine Remover 58 38" Oak Remove 85 d^ Palm R— 151 6" P.I. Remover S 32^ Oak R— 32 24" Mme Remove 59 6" Unknoww Rr/wove 86 20" Pd- Remove 152 24" Oak Remain 6 15" Oak Rd—he 33 10" Pine Remove 60 14" Oak Remove 87 48- P.L. Remove 153 10" Palm Remove to— 7 25^ umMlaa Pine Remove 34 S" Plae Rumor 61 6" Pdm Remove 88 170" Sony- Rental. 151 12" Gumbo limbo Rem - 8 S" Oak Rd.Mr 35 15" Pine Remove 62 II" Oak Remove 1 89 2I^ 10ak Remove 1 155 24" Gumbo Umbo Remove 9 23" A.VindlaN Mme Rrnuve 36 20" Pine Remove 63 7" Pine Rentor 90 1 24- Gumbo Umbo Rumor 156 S" Oak Relocate 10 13" Pine Remove 37 10" Pine Rumor 64 21" Oak Remove 91 12" Oak Relocate 157 12" Gumbo Umbo Remove 11 12" Mnt Remove i 3d 13" Pine Remove 65 24" Unknown Remove 92 IS" Unk.amn Remove 158 12" Gumbo Umbo Remove 12 13" Oak Rdoeate 39 12" Polm Remove 66 12" Gumbo Umbo Renove 93 /I" Oak RelaMe 159 6" Gumbo Umbo Remove 13 17" Oak Remain i 40 12" Unknown Remove 67 36" Oak Remove 96 5" Palm Remove 160 12" Gumbo Umbo Remove It— II 12" Mae R— Il 60" Unkaoww Remove 68 12" Oak Relocate 97 S^ Pd. Remove - .161 12" Patin Rumor IS 15" Pine Remove 42 10" Royal Pdndana Remove 69 25" Oak Remove 98 S" Palm Remove 162 24" Oak Remain 16 12" Mwr Remove 13 10^ Pdm Rmmve 70 12^ Gumbo Umbo Rem -e 99 S^ Patin Remove 168 30^ Oak Rend. 17 15^ Fine Remove 44 /0" Pdm Remove E72 24" Oak Remdm 100 30" Palm Remove 164 18" Palm Remove I8 15" Plnt Remove 45 30" Oak Rtmatrt 30' Oak Rrmdw 138 12" Pdm Remove Itis 10" Unknown19 15" Pine Remove 16 12^ Oa4 Ramve 28" Unknown Remove 139 30" Pdm Rentor 166 /I" Unknown Remove it - I t I ARCHITECTURAL 6 1 a T N r S H I a 116ALHAMBRACCtCLE, SUrrEJ CORAL GABLES, FLORIDA 33134 F,man : bap�Lepd®�.00m Florida Cap AA0002364 PH 305.444.7100 FX 305.144.9803 1 10 p1911BrB—A.Wftilam11pPA. C 0 k S 1 t U_( I A _I I PLAN .. / axvommwrxrA/, S n s lA.a9CA1[ A8Gl11TtC1Vu LAwO USt A8—ALYW91S MaT LAUDeA.ALB I IDAO MU- / 8Am NAx 10 BRICKELL MAINSTREET i I 0 9 ~HI� vwma w RH °0i•e 1' . 50'-0" EXISTING TREE DESIGNATION PLAN U 99oo5 1-1.02 November 1, 1899 • • ° � I � I� I I I I I I � • � � I I� 5 Brlckell Mainstreet- Project Information: for Major Use Special Permit 114-99 4 — 5 — ZONING DISTRICT: SD -7 - Central Srickell Rapid Transit Comrxrelal-Residential District SITE INFORMATION REQUIREDIALLOWABLE PROVIDED Gross Lot Area Grose Leasable Area Total- 247,470 of = 5.7 aces Am Net Lot M BRICKELL Block 71= 133,363 J. or plea epees MAINSTREET Block 72= 47 073 s f.mw Row - CS. w.N Av.1 109,990 .1 160,436 of - 4.1 aces Gross Floor Area: 175,5= e.:. %W GIA Hotel Nrn4le.klerme4 2.25 x Gross 558,BOB s.l. 197, 380 s.f. Re.idsrrtleL 6.0 x Grine 1.494,.sL 20 187,580..1. Mlnl mum Lot Coverage No restrictions Na MWmum Veml Setbacks to" sbeet- 174'H7• Skeet- r74' 197,580..1. fatal S. kOSN Avars 174' S. M ' A— I74' 1,600 s t e 80"1'15'-0" ° Sooc1- s4' end la -0' 9 -SM 13S4,90 S.F. S.E. /•A—l5'-V SMI'Avcmro- 15' £ LG�7eL PtYlkll Interloratem yards -res mb. lm i.1Rnrlydv-nori nim REQUIRED IALLOWAKE Ab4r-addO..W la ove Above 49- some r meek wtbwks Bu0dirlg Heipbt No restrictions Subgde Pinking- 11-1: 9'4' 7-A k. Wes 5 H.C. spec. Rm 1-21ev . 30'41 1 err 100..1. ma,3marm• 320 an Upper Prk.p. 680 am (8.5 MJ Upper Pmkinr- 7leveb: 70'41 Horel-12 kvets: 170'4'. Includes 2 H.C. ep9eve1 • 12 H.C. spaces 1. too.fnof 270'4• OP -Space 1..1160 s_I: Tote)Maxi— LOSS 0'r ovr SO,OOOs.l.•3.488../ 24,100..1. op99 spec LOADING CALCULATIONS: Groh BrAdkq Am: 394,940 S.F. 2 ®1z. 5 I-xA_*Weto 50tr0,000... 9— 2®10' x 25' • PROJECT TABULATIONS: _ 4. N • 9"' �irF!!T Fk,2^,y �eft 1co.V• Gross BwWmg Area- h d rsnv.. Grose Leasable Area r'v.rsa BRICKELL or plea epees MAINSTREET RetaillRestauranffi -Level 1 109,990 .1 -Level 2 H70W s 195. BMW ..1. total GaA 175,5= e.:. %W GIA Hotel :9.350 s.fJnw .m A1.01 2 b—e1 / 24 roam per rm i12ih79Le ' 195,960 s.l. -Lpbayrserwm 1,600.1 197,580..1. fatal Corrummlty Bu8ding 1,600 s t 1,500..1. TOTAL 13S4,90 S.F. - 4 LLxJL'L. taCTHL CU,k-VIN: �.rr £ LG�7eL PtYlkll 14� GROSS _OOR AREAS REQUIRED IALLOWAKE PROVIDED R.WWC—fly Bld0: 185,380..1. dl. OUIIJ2N4 7-A k. Wes 5 H.C. spec. Rest.wo* 32,000 st 1 err 100..1. ma,3marm• 320 an Upper Prk.p. 680 am (8.5 MJ Includes 2 H.C. ep9eve1 • 12 H.C. spaces Hotel- 268 ronin ' 2 are/ 3 wale mmrFnrrrr• 192,r Ippe, Prkkn. !80 an l2 N 1 kldWes 2 H.C..oflavel.4 H.."•..o Tote)Maxi— LOSS 0'r Tota: Provided• 1,040 can Hw dtapp 4aces 20.1 it each 100 or. err 1000 ous • 1ldudes 21 H.C. spaces tole: 21 an minmaall Q b' 19• 0'.s' M'f � � � V ♦. L� Mbersf r� }nrcti e r 1 rI•i1E1W) 2 LC,Ra- 1�'i/14L $Blk-0IN4 . 9 — � 1d1 Y i 2LE^IE3- ZL�'/C1-Y-EV•lf- 12'' ase- i t d w— - —.— �— —L- �. — --r4W. rr��c...eaty rau�c. • .� .� � ,v_� — -- T a, q} 1b1EL pse• -e • s upD p,ror uFr eon �•�a.r�hnr� � 'pp��.. SITE PLAN- LEVEL 1 PLAN 12— SCALE: I"= W.T 13 PROJECT TABULATIONS: 116 ALHAMBRA CIRCLE, SURE J CORAL GABLES, FLORIDA 33134 E-mail: bap@bapdmigo.Wm Florida Corp AA0002364 PH 305.444.7100 FX 305.444.9803 CTYgwm1979Ry.Been ArtEbcmelP_. tPA Gross BwWmg Area- h d rsnv.. Grose Leasable Area servim. at—al lackafty Wee vn6rnays BRICKELL or plea epees MAINSTREET RetaillRestauranffi -Level 1 109,990 .1 -Level 2 H70W s 195. BMW ..1. total GaA 175,5= e.:. %W GIA Hotel :9.350 s.fJnw .m A1.01 2 b—e1 / 24 roam per rm i12ih79Le ' 195,960 s.l. -Lpbayrserwm 1,600.1 197,580..1. fatal Corrummlty Bu8ding 1,600 s t 1,500..1. TOTAL 13S4,90 S.F. - PARKING TABULATIONS: GROSS _OOR AREAS REQUIRED IALLOWAKE PROVIDED R.WWC—fly Bld0: 185,380..1. 1 ad 30D..1. mmkMwm 651 era Sabgrsde= 3DO era (1 N.) k. Wes 5 H.C. spec. Rest.wo* 32,000 st 1 err 100..1. ma,3marm• 320 an Upper Prk.p. 680 am (8.5 MJ Includes 2 H.C. ep9eve1 • 12 H.C. spaces Hotel- 268 ronin ' 2 are/ 3 wale mmrFnrrrr• 192,r Ippe, Prkkn. !80 an l2 N 1 kldWes 2 H.C..oflavel.4 H.."•..o Tote)Maxi— LOSS 0'r Tota: Provided• 1,040 can Hw dtapp 4aces 20.1 it each 100 or. err 1000 ous • 1ldudes 21 H.C. spaces tole: 21 an minmaall TOTAL CARS Max. Allawed--1,063 ears Provided= 1,040 ears _1 —2 —3 _5 >>d' 0'W- )pprL_ 1��:. a... 4^ 4krKenr � LIIAI Fp�e'vukaK-�aa * r r.;r. 61m/ce-ReukL I�N4vv.11' r��ShF 6drLmING 15 IWI"& rte' _ � , rAKKadG ,I —7 —r V 2 t- -ift- 4f6C LPNP9�Frl' g' Perm Pk,b pmwr .asH 1[ j11 j pap, r =L 0'w lblwamY a _ ►>VINu 1 1 aa14v1�10 0 Q • � 16' ,crest• II �� + 1s•ay.. 964AN r f/}k ZPpNL aCg9. 1 - + I tub Plcla114 { 4.0. lee, 4TPP" I I I I 0 1 • 1 1 116 ALHAMBRA CIRCLE, SURE J CORAL GABLES, FLORIDA 33134 E-mail: bap@bapdmigo.Wm Florida Corp AA0002364 PH 305.444.7100 FX 305.444.9803 CTYgwm1979Ry.Been ArtEbcmelP_. tPA r o a S T 1 0 1 1 A BRICKELL MAINSTREET ..r w CSS rna 1' . w1_40 SITE PLAN AND CALCULATIONS 99005 .m A1.01 11.1.99 W] W] • 0 � I ( D [ i 0 M I J K Y N 0 • f I I I I I I V y � - E 7 6MYIM {11EF1 _-. Z.li 4 Tz- 4 el t � iNY01G - — TYPICAL PARKING BAY FITTI SCALE: 718"= 1'.M i -11 TFTF1_ F_ TTJ TrI _ 1 —' ��� • � Ivuel.e 49FI2 H' rev Fvwnr• r•c�tlol�l _Ze TYPICAL HANDICAPPED SUBGRADE PARKING PLAN PARKING SPACE SCALE: 7" W -M . WALE: N.T.S. 1 f—- — �mnpaL � •Pbl pp/lot d �94 —e �IwE. twc♦e o�N•rw,YtNw i . - / trawl flx. 1yF" e.' eo' moo' 35' cGH1yL- ss• 9�, /WA i "Fn�.l I � YII:f BfICY7 Nawl- � � —1 C � Cp+oGs -- � � aPGN�NM1 ��- 10- r —t LEVEL 2 PLAN 73— SCALE: 1"= 301-0" ,a I 1 I 1I I I I I I I I I I I E F 0 N 1 J K L Y Y 0 ° ' ARCHITECTURAL PARTNERSHIP 116 ALHAMBRA CIRCLE, SUITE 1 CORAL GABLES, FLORIDA 33134 E-mail: bap@bapdcsign.com Florida Corp AA0002364 PH 305.444.7100 FX 305.444.9803 CapydlY ®1999 By Bame ArtdimcmY Pvnwmq, PA C O E 3 1 1 0 f T A BRICKELL MAINSTREET ru n L'S5 rwi' - ffi_0 SUBGRADE PARKING AND SECOND LEVEL 99005 .m A1.02 "'11- 1- `1`1 B E A M ARCHITECTURAL PARTNERSHIP m i 17-1 • JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA 00- 188 i►a Excerpt from the Record of Proceedings of the Regular Semimonthly Meeting of the City of Miami Planning Advisory Board, at Miami City Hall, 3500 Pan American Drive, Miami, Florida, on Wednesday, January 19, 2000 commencing at 7:00 p.m., the Honorable James "Chip" Black presiding as Chairman. BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT: Ofelia Tabares-Fernandez Steven Polakoff Dana L. Manner Raymond F. McElroy Jose E. Arnaez Frank Lengyel Doris K. Scheer ALSO PRESENT: Miriam Maer, Asst. City Attorney Vanessa Castillo, Acting Clerk of the Board Lourdes Slazyk, Dept. of Planning PAU?jpFl ZLeloplill Vicky Garcia -Toledo, Esq. and Carter McDowell, Esq. Appearing on behalf of the Applicant Santiago Echemendia, Esq. Appearing on behalf of Brickell Village Land Company Submitted into the public recon iin,,connection with item EL22 on I -?"G` Walter Foeman City Clerk JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA co- iss � aK W JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA 1 THEREUPON, the following item was heard: 2 3 CHAIRMAN BLACK: We're going to go 4 ahead, if you don't mind, and go to number 5 four, and then we'll split after that at a 6 request from one of our members that has to 7 leave after that item. 8 So if we can go ahead and zip right 9 on into that one. 10 Lourdes, are you prepared? 11 MS. SLAZYK: Item number four is a 12 Major Use Special Permit for the Brickell 13 Main Street Project. The address is 14 approximately 900 South Miami Avenue, and 15 it's more described in your package. It 16 does cross both sides of Miami Avenue. 17 That's why I say "approximately." 18 This project is in order to allow 19 mixed use development consisting of 288 20 hotel rooms with accessory recreational `-'_u Cd 21 uses, 197,380 square feet of retail and 3: % o r E U U u ( Z U 22 other non-residential uses and 1,040 o c c a A 23 parking spaces. .a " a� 24 The department is recommending E m 00 E 25 approval with conditions of this project. u) JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA 0 JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDAvy U r 1 This one was also recommended for 2 approval by the Urban Development Review 3 Board; by the Large Scale Development 4 Committee. 5 The department finds that this 6 project because of the mix of retail and 7 hotel development, it is also something 8 that could very much benefit our Brickell 9 Village District. It will allow a location 10 for visitors to come. 11 It also has the convenient access to 12 the public transit that makes it also 13 ideally suited for this type of use on this 14 particular property. 15 It is also located on our Brickell 16 promenade and it spans Miami Avenue. 17 The project the way it's proposed 18 now, it's being proposed as three phases: 19 Phase one would be the retail; phase v -c c�c 20 two, the hotel, and phase three is a = 3S E °' Qc� oU 21 pedestrian bridge which will span South .0j .. L 22 Miami Avenue to link the two blocks in o c o o� U 23 question. . 24 The department is recommending 4- .0 .c 0 25 approval of phases one and two with JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDAvy U r 1 conditions and denial of phase three. 2 Pedestrian bridge discourages the 3 pedestrian activity at the ground level 4 which is critical to the success of an 5 urban area, especially the Brickell Village 6 area and concept which was envisioned for 7 this area. We don't believe that that's 8 appropriate. 9 The other condition we have, which 10 goes to phase one, is the vehicular dropoff 11 areas that serve the project. 12 We concur with the vehicular dropoff 13 area on Ninth Street for the restaurants 14 and the one on Tenth Street for the hotel, 15 but to have a second one on Tenth Street we 16 feel is excessive. And Tenth Street is our 17 Brickell promenade and we feel that having 18 vehicular dropoff areas can be disruptive 19 to the pedestrian flow and the Brickell 20 promenade concept on Tenth Street._ c� E` 21 So we would recommend that the third a C r 0 ._ u tw 22 vehicular dropoff area along Tenth Street o c C v �Cco� 23 be eliminated. .o "q ,c�1 24 This project also had variances which = P a U E 25 the department recommended approval for JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA U- rA JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA 1 finding that there was hardship, and the 2 Zoning Board concurred and recommended 3 approval of the variances. 4 Other than that, the rest of the 5 conditions are the standard conditions that 6 are in our Major Use Special Permit. 7 So the two additional conditions 8 other than our standard are the vehicular 9 dropoff area and denial of the pedestrian 10 bridge. 11 CHAIRMAN BLACK: Lourdes, would you 12 just explain the pedestrian bridge 13 objection, please? 14 MS. SLAZYK: Okay. The pedestrian 15 bridge -- when people want to cross from 16 one phase of a project to another phase of 17 a project, the department contends that 18 that activity on the ground floor activates 19 the urban street the pedestrian edge. 20 When you provide a pedestrian bridge, D 21 you're taking that pedestrian movement offs c U 22 of the sidewalk and streets and putting it o c c 0 23 That discourages what we c �0 CO3 up above. ru ._ 24 envision as the Brickell Village concept, E .Q cn 25 that, you know, we're now starting to get, JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA 1 as you saw in the previous project, 2 residential projects, we're getting the 3 commercial projects, we're getting the type 4 of projects in this area that could create 5 a 24-hour activity pattern. 6 Pedestrian bridges tend to discourage 7 that because if, you know, somebody can get 8 across easier up above, they're not going 9 to be down in the street level, and that, 10 you know, is -- contradicts the Brickell 11 Village concept as envisioned. 12 One other thing before I forget. The 13 same condition that I added for the 14 previous item, that the reservation of the 15 DRI credits are due within 60 days of the 16 effective date of the development order. 17 CHAIRMAN BLACK: Thank you, Lourdes. 18 MS. GARCIA-TOLEDO: Good evening, 19 Vicky Garcia -Toledo with offices at 2500 -- c 20 MS. ESTEVEZ: Can I? One second. _ n o c 0 21 For the record, my name is Ely LL..- »- �- U 22 Estevez. I'm with the Department of Public c Cc::0c10 . o 23 Works. a0 24 One of the comments of the Planning 6 E 25 Department is a dropoff area. JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA 0 1 12 Dropoff areas are not allowed in 2 public right of way; therefore, they need a 3 valet parking permit as per city ordinance. 4 So under the previous meeting, they 5 agreed to obtain a valet parking permit 6 GARCIA-TOLEDO: with the Department of Public Works. 7 CHAIRMAN BLACK: But the department 8 14 is objecting to the dropoff in the first 9 place, correct? 10 MS. SLAZYK: But they have three of 11 them. JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA 12 CHAIRMAN BLACK: Okay. Vicky. 13 MS. ESTEVEZ: Thank you. GARCIA-TOLEDO: 14 MS. -- with offices 15 and 2500 First Union Financial Center. 16 And while we agree and concur with 17 the conditions of staff, we do respectfully 18 disagree in terms of requesting that you do 19 approve the three dropoff areas, and you U t c 20 will hear more about that in a little bit. 3 E v 0 21 We also would like you to consider vcd LL c� 22 approving the bridge or at least ® o U 23 recommending the approval of the bridge. 24 We will also give you more information -0 00 E 25 about that later. JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA 10 1 And we will be very happy if granted 2 the three dropoff areas to, of course, 3 obtain the valet permits consistent with 4 the code. 5 The project that you're seeing -- and 6' let me take a moment to let you know that 7 the project that you're seeing before you 8 is presented by a partnership of which the 9 general partner is Constructa, and we have 10 with us here today two principals of that 11 company, Mr. George Giebel and Mr. Philippe 12 Labarre. 13 We also have the architects for the 14 project, Beame and Associates, and they're 15 represent by Larry Beame who will be doing 16 a presentation for you, as well as Olga 17 Garcia and Katie Salow. 18 We have other members of our 19 development team. Amongst them, Mr. T. v� cc -g 20 Imada who is the traffic engineer has cr o U L 21 prepared the traffic report and will be 22 happy to answer any questions you have C o " U q1 23 relating to traffic as well as Richard W.s 5 (--�� EL 24 Heilig (phonetic) Who is the landscape ° C- 25 architect. JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA co- 11 JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA G?0� 1 I am joined here with Carter 2 McDowell, a partner from our law firm. 3 The project a mixed use project. It 4 calls for approximately 198,000 square feet 5 of retail space as phase one, a hotel, an 6 all suites hotel as phase two; a parking 7 deck and a community building. 8 The retail, as you're seeing depicted 9 in these plans, are two stories in height 10 surrounded by very much open spaces and 11 public plazas. This is very consistent 12 with the SD -7 requirement of this zone. 13 I also would like to point out, 14 Mrs. Scheer, that under tab number six of 15 our book, you have a series of color 16 photographs depicting location and we hope 17 that was helpful. 18 What I'd like to do at this time 19 since it's getting a little late is to stop E v a� 20 my presentation, introduce Larry Beame the o► LL:L- ,ul U 21 architect, let him walk you through this, o c co +, C c o o4 22 and then we will answer any questions you o c 23 may have. E =00E 24 CHAIRMAN BLACK: And would you speak CZ 25 to the issue about Tenth Street and why you JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA G?0� 12 1 feel that's important, the dropoff? 2 MR. POLAKOFF: The both, the dropoff 3 and also speak to the walkway. 4 MR. BEAME: I'm Larry Beame with 5 Beame Architectural Partnership at 116 6 Alhambra Circle in Coral Gables. 7 We have been working with Constructa 8 and the city for over a year in developing 9 what is a very unique project for the city 10 and for the Brickell area. 11 It's unique in a number of ways. 12 First of all, it's a mixed use 13 development which is very, very low 14 density, particularly compared to what 15 we're allowed to build. '16 Within the code, the project could be 17 over two million square feet, and with both 18 phases completed, we're proposing under 19 400,000 square feet, only one fifth of the v 20 allowable area.a Cr: E v 21 We started the design to develop act v o o c c ro 22 project that would be a place for the C:o e 'C7 23 people in the Brickell community. It's not•��) E 24 an entertainment center like Cocowalk. is25 It's a facility designed to serve the needs JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA 13 19 1 of the Brickell community, to have a lot of 2 open space, to have relaxing areas, to 20 3 respect the Brickell promenade; to respect o� 4 a lot of the natural landscaping and the 5 low structures in the area. 6 The retail have tenants like 21 7 restaurants, gourmet markets, specialty c o 8 stores, stores for the home, and service 9 stores particularly designed to accommodate o 10 the Brickell community. 22 11 We've even included a community C1, 12 building, which is here, which is adjacent 13 to the existing Allen Morris Park, that �N 14 could opened up and could be used by the 23 15 community, by different organizations and 16 by private individuals and would not be 17 dedicated to the retail use. 5 aEi 18 Let me explain some of the features 19 of the project. _ E ami 20 And let me orient you a little bit. o� �U `' 21 This is Southwest Ninth Street, this is o c o o 22 South Miami Avenue, and this is Tenth -a C1, �N 23 Street, which is the Brickell promenade. E" 5 aEi 24 It's the same street that Mr. Bermello wash `- 25 just talking about. His project is right JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA 14 1 across the street adjacent from ours. The 2 Metrorail station is at the end of the 3 street here and the People Mover station is 4 right here. Perricone's Restaurant is 5 right here, and the Allen Morris park here. 6 the have We've designed the project in the 7 spirit of wood, water and green, and which 8 we're going to preserve a number of the 9 trees. 16 also landscaping, and then a plaza around JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA ou`C 10 The project will be designed entirely 11 around three open public plazas. Public 12 plaza here with trees and fountains, a 13 public plaza facing South Miami Avenue that 14 the have extends across street, and also we 15 open areas for seating, outdoor dining and 16 also landscaping, and then a plaza around 17 the community building that ties into the 18 Allen Morris Park. 19 As I mentioned, we're looking at --� CZ 20 there's some very large oak trees along the � CL �' r a� E U 21 perimeter of the site and in the street and = .2 t U- 22 in the sidewalks that we are preserving. o r- c c 0 -o 23 We've even knocked the building around a 24 large banyan tree that exists in order to E .00 0 25 use it kind of as a tree house restaurant JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA ou`C FV 1 and plaza. 2 We've set the building back on the 3 Brickell promenade further than the setback 4 required by code because we believe in the 5 strength of the concept of the pedestrian 6 movement on this street. 7 Actually, we set it back in a way 8 that also encourages some outdoor dining 9 and set the level of the street in a way 10 people could walk directly into the 11 project. 12 There's an entrance into the project 13 from promenade along Tenth Street and a 14 number of different areas. 15 The architecture is designed with a 16 very tropical feeling reminiscent of some 17 of the existing historical, tropical 18 buildings of Miami. 19 And the hotel will be located in this �v c Em 20 area above the parking deck in the future n o U 0 0 LL 21 phase, and it's pointed very narrow face v v o c c 0 c o 22 towards Southwest Tenth Street. a U 23 MR. POLAKOFF: Could you address the c 24 two issues that the planning department L E 25 had? JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA 1 cl60 16 1 MR. WOLFBERG: Okay. The dropoff 2 areas that they're talking about are 3 located here and here. 4 One is at the hotel and it's really 5 dedicated to that use. The other one would 6 be located over here which would serve as a 7 dropoff into the retail portion, and then 8 the third is over here. 9 I believe the one the department is 10 objecting to is this one. 11 And we feel that it is necessary and 12 actually gets cars off the street to drop 13 people off as they come to the retail 14 facility. 15 Also, we're adding cars parallel 16 parking along Southwest Tenth Street. 17 And in fact, even though we show a 18 dropoff, we're still widening the sidewalk 19 and have a very wide sidewalk along that CO a� 20 side which is not interrupted by the car c o o 21 dropoff. v �a 22 Also, we are providing over a c 0 ry o 23 thousand parking spaces in order to •E 24 accommodate everyone that comes to the 0 v E to 2 25 facility and get them off the streets JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA • r] 17 1 quickly, both in an underground parking 2 deck which extends under this entire block 3 and -- and by placing that parking 4 underground, we're able to reduce the 5 height of the parking garage by nearly four 6 II floors and reduce the scale. 7This part of the project through here 8 is two levels, and these areas right here 9 is a pedestrian bridge that connects the 10 second level. 11Although we have a pretty limited 12 second floor area east of South Miami 13 Avenue, we believe the bridge provides a 14 very unique feature, not only for this 15 project, but for the neighborhood. 16 The Brickell area needs more identity 17 11 and we feel that the bridge helps identify 18 II this area kind of as the center of the 19 Brickell Villas and also it will enhance 20 the pedestrian movement, actually. � U r 21 As cars go by on South Miami Avenue, CL of U 0U 22 the bridge will help them recognize that o c o c o 23 there's a change and something is happening 24 and that is going do make them more alert. E .0 U E 25 Because there is going to be a lot of JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLO.IIA � 0 u ,� JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA : U L C - _�- CIS 3 E CL 0 c o c_ o a> E �vaEi C/) 1 pedestrian movement through these projects. 2 People are going to tend to walk wherever 3 the action is, wherever they have a place 4 to go, and we wanted to provide a feature 5 that would identify that something has 6 changed, that something is happening as 7 well, and it also helps to find a large 8 public plaza at this side. 9 MR. POLAKOFF: Would the third 10 dropoff in your opinion reduce the number 11 of trip turns on South Miami Avenue? 12 In other words, the bridge becomes 13 more necessary as traffic increases on 14 South Miami Avenue for the safety 15 pedestrians to the extent that the traffic 16 is limited on South Miami Avenue by the 17 fact that you have an extra dropoff. So it 18 is not necessary for a car then that's 19 unable to -- you can't drop off at the 20 hotel. So if they're heading east on 21 Tenth, they'll have to turn up South Miami 22 Avenue, go down South Miami Avenue, come 23 down in order to reach the dropoff. 24 So the unification, is it your 25 opinion that the unification of the plaza JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA : U L C - _�- CIS 3 E CL 0 c o c_ o a> E �vaEi C/) 19 15 1 is enhanced by the third dropoff? 2 Yes or no. You have to state it on 16 3 the record out loud. 4 MR. BEAME: Yes. 17 5 MS. GARCIA-TOLEDO: Let me address 6 one issue here. 18 7 Also, I think an important point for 8 the dropoff is that the two dropoffs on 19 9 Tenth have two very different natures. 10 One is the dropoff of the person 11 that's coming to the hotel. That's a 12 person that's getting off their car, is 20 13 getting their luggage out, it's taking D 14 longer. 15 The person that's going to use the 16 dropoff as envisioned in the retail area is 17 mostly the people that are going to come to 18 the restaurants, that are going to have the 19 valet pickup. U cLC co 20 And the truth is we've gotten D c('- o, 21 accustomed that when we go to a restaurant 0� '�,C'd �(j � a� 22 most of the time we use valet. O 5- o O cz �; 23 That's the purpose of this additional �N 24 dropoff. 0 E T 25 MR. POLAKOFF: If so if there was JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA 20 4 MS. GARCIA-TOLEDO: So we would 5 avoid -- you're absolutely right. We would 6 avoid the individuals who come down Tenth 7 and don't have a dropoff driving all the 8 way around, going on South Miami Avenue and 9 then coming looking for the Ninth Street. 10 We're envisioning that the Ninth 11 Street, the north dropoff, would be used by 12 people coming from the north and who will 13 be entering mostly from Brickell, and that 14 the Tenth Street dropoff will be mostly 15 people coming from the south. 16 We really feel that the two dropoffs 17 on Tenth are really addressing two very 18 different types of uses. And if we were to 19 use only the hotel for both purposes, then 2 c.?c z CU 20 we will have the quick dropoff of a C o U o U__ 21 restaurant being delayed by somebody taking's oCpCz 22 their luggage out of their car. So we feel c (5 23 the nature is very different. = E L 0 E 24 Also, as far as the pedestrian bridge a 25 is concerned, we really don't have the same JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDAaa 0-1��— 188 1 only one on the north side of the 2 development, you'd have more trip turns on 3 South Miami Avenue. 4 MS. GARCIA-TOLEDO: So we would 5 avoid -- you're absolutely right. We would 6 avoid the individuals who come down Tenth 7 and don't have a dropoff driving all the 8 way around, going on South Miami Avenue and 9 then coming looking for the Ninth Street. 10 We're envisioning that the Ninth 11 Street, the north dropoff, would be used by 12 people coming from the north and who will 13 be entering mostly from Brickell, and that 14 the Tenth Street dropoff will be mostly 15 people coming from the south. 16 We really feel that the two dropoffs 17 on Tenth are really addressing two very 18 different types of uses. And if we were to 19 use only the hotel for both purposes, then 2 c.?c z CU 20 we will have the quick dropoff of a C o U o U__ 21 restaurant being delayed by somebody taking's oCpCz 22 their luggage out of their car. So we feel c (5 23 the nature is very different. = E L 0 E 24 Also, as far as the pedestrian bridge a 25 is concerned, we really don't have the same JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDAaa 0-1��— 188 • • 1 fear that staff has that people are 2 actually going to leave the sidewalk, go up 3 the stairs on this side, walk across the 4 bridge and down the stairs to continue 5 walking. 6 The truth of the matter is that those 7 who are on a pedestrian friendly promenade 8 of Tenth Street are just going to cross at 9 that corner. 10 The purpose of this bridge, besides, 11 I think, creating the harder center of the 12 neighborhood, it's also going to facilitate 13 the merchants on that second floor creating 14 activity and symbiosis between both sides 15 of the street. 16 So I think that's why we feel that 17 the pedestrian bridge is so important. 18 Let me also add that we are including 19 an additional building, that building that 20 is directly to the north of the city park, 21 of the Allen Morris Park. We are calling 22 it the community center. And this is a 23 free standing building approximately 1500 24 square feet that will have a steeple -type, 25 you know, characteristic to call attention JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA f 21 Cz E r CO CL _ o o LL c o .o U E �^ 0 v 22 1 to it, which we are hoping will become kind 2 of our town center. 3 And this would be able to uses by 4 homeowners associations for their meetings, 5 schools in the areas. 6 It also will be able to used for 7 weddings and bat mitzvahs and those kinds 8 of activities, because we really don't 9 have, you know, an open area room of that 10 sort or a space for that purpose within 11 this Brickell Avenue area. 12 MR. POLAKOFF: Just as a follow up, 13 that pedestrian bridge, which I'm trying to S14 sort out in my own mind if it's necessary 15 or not, does not have -- is accessible only 16 if you're on the second floor? The stairs 17 are at the street or sidewalk level and you 18 have to go up to the pedestrian bridge, 19 correct?E Q 3� ca c- o 20 MS. GARCIA-TOLEDO: Correct. v(� �i a� w- 21 MR. BEAME: In order to get to it, c o o U 22 you have to come in from up in here. So in E 23 order -- s v E 24 MR. POLAKOFF: People on the first k 0 25 II floor -- JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA 0r 23 1 12 MR. BEAME: Nobody is going to walk 2 to the stairs so they can off the street 3 and walk across. 4 14 MR. POLAKOFF: People on the first 5 floor are going to use it provided that the 6 traffic is light enough on South Miami 7 CHAIRMAN BLACK: Mr. McElroy. Avenue which is alleviated by the third 8 dropoff. MR. McELROY: I still have confusion 9 MS. GARCIA-TOLEDO: That bridge will 10 on the second floor bridge. Maybe you be used by those shopping at the second 11 level. could walk us. JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA 00— foo 12 MR. BEAMS: By the way, the dropoff, 13 the valet dropoff can be used by anybody. 14 We have over a thousand cars in our parking 15 facility. 16 CHAIRMAN BLACK: Mr. McElroy. 17 MR. McELROY: I still have confusion 18 on the second floor bridge. Maybe you 19 could walk us. CU 20 Let's say we're walking from one end s E a c o 21 of the property to the other, can we U 22 continue on the second floor bridge *-,C: o _ ir U .o 23 throughout the property on the second Q)•E E 24 floor? v E 25 MS. GARCIA-TOLEDO: Right. JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA 00— foo 24 18 1 MR. McELROY: You'll have retail on 2 both ends of the bridge? 19 3 MS. GARCIA-TOLEDO: Yes, yes. All of v 4 these pavilions, as you see them here 5 depicted, all have second level of stores, 6 and so that that bridge will connect the 20 7 entire project second level over Miami �� 8 Avenue. 9 MR. McELROY: I see. Okay. It ties. 0' 10 So you can walk in off South Miami 21 11 Avenue and go either way. U 12 Where would you come in? 13 Let's say if you were coming out of C C 14 the People Mover -- no. This one over 22 15 here -- show me how you would walk in and o 0 16 get up to the second floor and then walk 23 17 across to the hotel. 18 MR. BEAME: You could come in a 19 variety of ways. I'll give you a few.Co v 20 You could come in and walk through �� v v 0 0' L v 21 the park and go up here in the stairway and U Z5 a C C CZ 22 go across the bridge and connect through o 0 23 here. You could come in any one of theCD C 24 entrances off the Brickell promenade, which E v aEi 25 is Tenth Street, and go up a stair onto JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA 10- 1(:)8 25 1 this second level walkway which connects to 2 the second level tenants. 3 By the way, this is the second level 4 plan. So you can see the walkway that goes 5 around. 6 MS. GARCIA-TOLEDO: First and second 7 level retail. 8 MR. BEAME: There is retail, a small 9 amount on the east side of the site and all 10 across the west side of South Miami. 11 MR. McELROY: Is this area going to 12 be an air-conditioned space? 13 MR. WOLFBERG: It's open. It's 14 covered. It's covered with these very wide 15 overhangs. 16 MR. McELROY: Okay. 17 MR. BEAME: And trellis -- I mean, 18 the bridge is a very light, lazy feature. 19 MR. POLAKOFF: I think we've heard E_ 20 from the public in the sense that people a ��` o U m .o U 21 want open areas. That's why Lincoln road � C: 0 22 has become a success again and that's why, C` ` 23 whether you like it or not, Cocowalk is a "- E ►- 24 success. co m a�i 25 MR. BEAME: This is the open walkways JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA GO- 26 1 I was just talking about, and this is the 2 bridge which is almost a trellis, a very 3 light, lazy bridge. 4 MR. McELROY: I have one question for 5 planning. 6 Is anybody from planning? 7 MS. SLAZYK: I'm here. 8 MR. McELROY: We have no more 9 bridges, do we? 10 We had the one with Burdines. Is 11 that still there? I can't even remember. 12 Downtown we used to have one at Burdines. 13 We used to have one on 40th Street also. 14 MS. SLAZYK: There's one the Omni to 15 the People Mover. 16 MR. POLAKOFF: There's one at 17 Burdines. 18 MS. SLAZYK: And Burdines. 19 MR. McELROY: And the one on 40th Z=8 ca, �1 20 street. There used to be one in the a c — o� Qy O LL 1 N C. 21 decorator center years ago. c o 0 c O 22 MS. SLAZYK: I'm not sure if that one -a 23 is still there. E 6 E 24 MR. McELROY: The Miami design 25 center. JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA GO- 18-8 27 1 MS. SLAZYK: The design district? 2 Yeah. 3 MR. POLAKOFF: That's an open air 4 one, correct? 5 MS. SLAZYK: Yes. 6 MR. POLAKOFF: And Burdines is not. 7 That's enclosed with glass block or 8 whatever. 9 This is mostly open. 10 MS. SLAZYK: Yes. 11 MS. GARCIA-TOLEDO: There's also a 12 bridge between Government Center and the 13 Museum of Natural History. 14 CHAIRMAN BLACK: We're getting a 15 little bit off the subject. 16 Vicky, will you go ahead and 17 continue? 18 MS. GARCIA-TOLEDO: I think that 19 pretty much we have covered the issues we 20 wanted to cover with you. I'd rather turn a o U 21 it over to you for any questions you may 0oo� 22 have. v ti 23 And I believe that there might be .c E L U E 24 someone wanting to make a presentation, so Co 2? a� 25 I would like to save some time for JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA 0- JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORgIDA '�� 1 rebuttal. 2 MR. LENGYEL: Mr. Chairman, just a 3 quick question. 4 Taking down that perspective you just 5 put up there. Going back to the second 6 floor retail on the right after you come 7 across the bridge. You said there's 8 limited -- no, on the other side. To the 9 right. Right there. How many square feet 10 is that? The one that's connected to the 11 bridge. That's connected to the bridge, 12 right? That's on the second floor? 13 MR. POLAKOFF: They're all connected 14 to the bridge. 15 MR. LENGYEL: No. But, I mean, 16 that's the only retail space on that side 17 of the bridge. 18 MR. POLAKOFF: No. 19 MR. BEAME: These, too. This space -� c. 20 is about 5400 feet. E. CL C: 0(0.0 LL4 21 MR. LENGYEL: And there is a a� o _o c c cU o� 22 stairwell from the part that goes up there. � 23 MR. BEAME: And an elevator._ cu .c 24 MR. POLAKOFF: Well, there has to be o co 25 an elevator for handicapped access, of JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORgIDA '�� ® • 29 1 course. 2 MR. MANNER: I have a question. 3 CHAIRMAN BLACK: Go ahead. 4 MR. MANNER: These questions have to 5 do with the parking, but I also have some 6 questions about the economic impact 7 analysis that was done. 8 MS. GARCIA-TOLEDO: I'll take the 9 parking. 10 MR. MANNER: Well, they go hand in 11 hand. 12 I'm looking at the economic impact 13 analysis and in the summary and conclusions 14 it says that phase one will have 728 15 permanent positions for retail and 16 restaurant employees. Project operating 17 staff will be 35 permanent positions, 18 project -- I'm sorry. Yes. And that the 19 second phase, the 300 -room hotel, will have •`-' C 2 E m EU 20 150 permanent positions.�� z. U 21 So I count all of those heads, and if O c co cco� - O 22 I were to take the retail and restaurant 23 employees, 728, and say we had two shifts 'E L U E 24 of employees, we'd have 364 people working 25 there that need parking spaces. JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA 61U_ 30 JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA 0- 1 For the hotel, Let's say that that 2 runs 24 hours and you need three shifts, 3 that's 50 employees at the hotel that need 4 someplace to park, plus another 30 people, 5 35 people that work at the project itself 6 permanently. 7 So from the 990 parking spaces, you 8 consume more than half with staff. 9 MR. POLAKOFF: I don't think that's 10 accurate entirely. Partially from some 11 knowledge of hotel operations and 12 restaurant operations and the level of 13 staff that you're employing, a lot of them 14 are very dependent upon public 15 transportation. 16 I mean, every day at the corner of 17 Biscayne and 36th, hundreds, I mean, 18 literally hundreds of maids, busboys, of 19 that nature are waiting for the bus over to c Co 20 Miami Beach to service those hotels. a ter: o U .0 1 LL' 21 So I don't think, you know, the 2 v 22 entire staff, that each one is arriving in 0 23 their own car.' c� - 'E 24 CHAIRMAN BLACK: It's an = 5 aEi u 25 interesting --' JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA 0- 31 18 1 MR. MANNER: Let's cut it in half. 2 actually off site and never are there. MR. POLAKOFF: Okay. That's fair. 3 MR. MANNER: And then we're at the 4 IF; aD point where we have a substantial dent in MS. GARCIA-TOLEDO: And also the key 5 aEiV the number of parking spaces. 6 Q C: ` 0 1L And we have what? 200,000 square 7 situation here, and I think it's something feet of retail space. 8 Where do the patrons park? C o 9 MS. GARCIA-TOLEDO: I think when that was alluded to in your previous 10 we're talking about the generation of 728 23 11 a jobs, we're looking at the entire number of 12 employees for the entire center. It 13 24 doesn't mean that they will all be there at = o 14 the same time. There are many different 15 shifts. 25 16 MR. MANNER: I did that division in 17 shifts. 18 MR. POLAKOFF: Some of them are 19 actually off site and never are there. U =V Co IF; aD 20 MS. GARCIA-TOLEDO: And also the key aEiV Q C: ` 0 1L LO 21 situation here, and I think it's something v C o 22 that was alluded to in your previous E O U 23 application, this site is located between''- a 24 Metrorail and Metromover, and the whole = o U) 25 idea is that people will encouraged to come JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA 32 JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA 0- 1 to this site, especially employees, by the 2 use of public transportation. 3 We also are going to have -- and 4 that's what we keep taking about when we 5 talk about the creation of a community 6 center and a neighborhood atmosphere. The 7 whole concept when the City of Miami 8 created the limitations on parking was to 9 encourage people to use the Metrorail and 10 to encourage people to walk. 11 MR. MANNER: I believe that's fair. 12 MS. GARCIA-TOLEDO: And there is the 13 basis of the whole Brickell promenade as 14 was projected. 15 We have maxed out what the code will 16 allow us to build right now under the 17 current code in terms of parking. We are 18 at the maximum allowable parking. 19 MR. BEAME: Besides designing to the V O C U 20 city standards and providing the maximum o� ii v 21 parking, the project has to be viable in o c c 0 a 22 the marketplace. U 23 And we really, as far as parking E ►- U E 24 goes, we really answer to a different 25 authority. We answer to the tenants who JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA 0- 091 16 1 are willing to put down the money and they 2 know what their needs are. calculation we just did based on the 3 And these parking ratios are studied. 4 It's based on empirical data of many 5 tenants, many facilities around the country 19 6 and the world that are tenant used. We 7 specialize in shopping center and hotel 8 design. I can tell you this is pretty 9 standard numbers. 10 I think probably your calculations of 11 the number of employee spaces is a little t 12 high. They do find a place to park. still leave 735 parking spaces for patrons. 13 These are the quantities that seem to U 14 work all over, including other projects in o rr- o S 15 Miami. 16 MS. GARCIA-TOLEDO: Based on a quick 17 calculation we just did based on the 18 numbers that you were just talking about, 19 it would put approximately 229 employees v 3 . c c E°' 20 on-site at any given time. That would a,U o t — 21 still leave 735 parking spaces for patrons. E ( U MR. ARNAEZ: That's not counting the o rr- o S 022 a ` o 23 hotel?_ .C: E � 24 MS. GARCIA-TOLEDO: That's counting Q E 25 the hotel. It would leave 735 parking JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA CV *0-- I68 34 17 1 spaces. 2 MR. POLAKOFF: How many guest rooms this is not going to be a high-end type 3 in the hotel? 4 MS. GARCIA-TOLEDO: We're looking at 0=6 5 288 as a maximum number. 6 MR. POLAKOFF: In calculating your E� 7 parking, obviously like you have experience specifically trying to catch the corporateQ 8 in the retail and what their demands are, U 9 what is the projected mix of hotel assuming ,o 10 a 90 percent occupancy that will arrive and 21 11 not bring cars and that will arrive by taxi m 12 and stay there and the ones -- and the 13 percentage that, you know, as most people 22 that will come to work in the downtown area -Si o 14 do, they arrive at Miami Airport, they rent 15 a car, even if it's to drive a lousy three 16 miles to get to the hotel. 17 MS. GARCIA-TOLEDO: We calculate that 18 this is not going to be a high-end type 19 hotel. This is a street hotel. We're 0=6 E� 20 specifically trying to catch the corporateQ © U ,o U_ 21 traveler niche. These are mostly people m v o c o 22 that will come to work in the downtown area -Si o U C 23 and in the Brickell Avenue area and deal a) _ 24 with those types of business that are E aEIs i 25 existing and therefore take full advantage JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLO IDA U_� 35 1 of the Metromover that is available without 2 having to deal with the parking issue 3 either at this site or in their, you know, 4 in their businesses in downtown Miami. 5 MR. POLAKOFF: This hotel is 6 primarily oriented and marketed for 7 business travelers. 8 MS. GARCIA-TOLEDO: Business travel. 9 MR. POLAKOFF: There's no plan on 10 this project, I assume, for movie theaters 11 of any sort? 12 MS. GARCIA-TOLEDO: This is not an 13 entertainment center. Let me make that 14 very clear. This is strictly -- the mix of 15 retailers for this project was done from a 16 feasibility study looking at the services 17 that the neighbors in Brickell Avenue 18 corridor and in the surrounding residential 19 areas have not had. 20 We keep putting in the residential o-, � U L v 21 component without offering the services o c o c o 22 that are in dire need, and being that I'm a 23 resident of the area, I know of what I E o 0500aEi Cn 24 speak. 12D �. 25 So the mix is very specific. This is JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA 36 JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA 0- IS,0 1 considered a home lifestyle center and all 2 of the stores here will be geared towards 3 the uses and services in the house. The 4 anchor at the back of the property will be 5 a gourmet restaurant and all the other 6 stores will be -- a gourmet market, excuse 7 me. And we envision about five or so 8 restaurants, white tablecloth restaurants, 9 and the rest will be almost boutique -type 10 home stores for linens and kitchens and 11 those kinds of things. 12 We don't want to use any specific 13 retailer's name because, you know, 14 obviously, we're in negotiations, but it's 15 that kind of atmosphere that we want to 16 create. And there will be no movie 17 entertainment -type activity. 18 MR. ARNAEZ: Is the hotel going to 19 have provisions for conventions? v C .�5 20 MS. GARCIA-TOLEDO: No. L? _ � V 21 MR. ARNAEZ: I have to tell you. W O Cc o 22 It's an awesome presentation and I think 0(4 m .�N 23 the building, it's really nice. E- =ma�i 24 About the bridge. If I'm on the co ` =' 25 second floor, I sure don't want to come JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA 0- IS,0 37 JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORID 1 down to the first floor to cross the 2 street. I'd just stay on the second floor 3 and cross it. 4 And on the third drop off, it's going 5 to alleviate a lot of the traffic that is 6 going to be dropped off in the other one. 7 So I agree with that one, too. 8 Unfortunately, the hotel is not going 9 to have provisions for some type of 10 convention because it's geared up for it. 11 MS. SCHEER: I think the whole 12 concept of the bridge is very interesting. 13 We've been to many cities where basically 14 the hotels -- I don't know about the same 15 people crossing each other -- they put in 16 bridges. It doesn't stop any business. It 17 just allows, their people, their customers, 18 or whatever it is, to avail themselves of 19 someplace else to go. c E 20 And didn't Jacksonust do something j g 1 c -c r o U o 21 with a bridge? o cc cook 22 MR. POLAKOFF: It's a parking garage a� c 23 bridge. E L 24 MS. SCHEER: A parking garage. 0) LOP) °= ` 25 To me it might open up a few doors, I JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORID • • • 1 mean, for the same owner but even for 2 different owners to encourage a mix. 3 MS. GARCIA-TOLEDO: It does 4 facilitate retailers to share. You're 5 absolutely right. And it facilitates 6 access for the customer. 7 MR. McELROY: I'd like to make a 8 comment on the bridge. 9 I would like to see the bridges 10 facilitate moving walkways in this area. I 11 think this will be a great area for the 12 moving walkways. 13 MR. POLAKOFF: We all need exercise. 14 MR. McELROY: This whole corridor. 15 CHAIRMAN BLACK: We got to stay on 16 point here. We're drifting. 17 Is there any -- are there any other 18 comments, Vicky? Do you have anything else 19 to proffer at the moment? 20 Okay. If not -- 21 MR. LENGYEL: Mr. Chairman, I'm 22 sorry. 23 I need Lourdes to -- I understand why 24 you don't want the bridge, because you 25 think it will keep people from the ground UL� a-� EU ci c " 0 LL U � c o C o U � c E U Cn ` 0 JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA 0 - 100 39 JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA bu- 18- 1 level which is why you want them at, right? 2 MS. SLAZYK: Yes. 3 MR. LENGYEL: Okay. Restate again 4 why you don't want the third dropoff? 5 MS. SLAZYK: Because Tenth Street has 6 been designated the Brickell promenade and 7 the activity with the vehicles we also feel 8 would tend to distract from the pedestrian 9 nature of the street, with cars constantly 10 coming and going and the valet people 11 moving, we feel that that would distract 12 from -- you know, we wanted a lower scale 13 of vehicular movements on it because it's a 14 in the Brickell pedestrian street promenade 15 and we feel that would detract from it. 16 MR. LENGYEL: But you're allowing for 17 or you're not opposed to the one that's up 18 by the hotel for obvious reasons. 19 MS. SLAZYK: Actually the SD -7 J c = �� E a =r o� 20 discourages this type of thing on all of L L .c a a� 21 the Brickell promenade, but we understand ca c o o _ 22 for the hotel that it is much more critical C) c w 23 because of the nature of hotel users = 0 E co 24 arriving in cabs and they're just going to 25 park on the street and do it anyway. So it JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA bu- 18- Me 1 would be much more comfortable to provide a is2 dropoff area for that, for valet, even 3 though there we know it's going to be used 4 more for dropoff than for valet -type 5 services. 6 MR. POLAKOFF: If you don't have 7 dropoffs or you limit the number of 8 dropoffs, people are still going -- you 9 know, you come with a group of four and you 10 say, okay, I'll take the car -- and there's 11 no valet and you say, I'll take the car 12 down to the garage. You all get out here 13 and I'll take the car. And so you're going 14 to end up kind of mucking up the flow of 15 traffic. The driver stops, drops people 16 off and then goes down into the garage to 17 come up, because usually you don't want to 18 drag everybody down to the garage and up. 19 You might as well just go down yourself and CU 20 come up. So this kind of keeps the flow. a � U a� 4 LL 21 Yes, it's a compromise. Obviously, you're � U a� o c c co 22 trying to weigh pedestrian with -- but the _c c o U 23 one thing you don't want is back up and•c E 24 horns beeping, particularly with the new o � E � 2) S) 25 residential project that's going up next JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDAc� 0"` 41 JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA 0- - 8 C 1 door across the street. You know, you want 2 to have flow and is less -- the fewer the 3 trip turns, the better, and the less back 4 up of traffic, and so I think it's a 5 compromise we're trying to reach. I'm not 6 trying to be adverse. 7 MS. SLAZYK: The more cars that come 8 in to use it versus just finding a parking 9 space, the more the traffic will back up to 10 use it and that is -- it detracts from the 11 pedestrian experience that Brickell 12 promenade is supposed to be. 13 CHAIRMAN BLACK: Thank you. 14 MR. LENGYEL: I'm still on the 15 landscape plan. If you'll go back to that. 16 Show me the dropoff, again, that the 17 planning board is opposed to, which I know 18 is right there. Where's the parking 19 entrance from there?CU o s 20 MR. POLAKOFF: On the other side. it C a o(� arc 0 a� o L a 21 MR. LENGYEL: Two parking entrances. cO�� 22 And the parking entrance is down here �,4 a 23 to the left. .c 24 There's a dropoff for the hotel E .0 0 o E.) S.) co ai �i 25 where? JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA 0- - 8 C 42 1 And then there's a dropoff to the is 2 right. 3 I think -- I mean, I got to agree 4 with Lourdes. I see too much stopping. I 5 mean, even people going into the parking 6 garage are going to slow traffic down as 7 they make the turn into the parking garage. 8 You'll have people stopping to drop off 9 whoever for whatever reason, you'll have 10 people jamming up and stopping at the 11 hotel, and then you'll have people trying 12 to turn into the parking lot. I agree with 13 Lourdes. 14 Well, how much distance is that more 15 or less? 16 MR. BEAME: 150 feet. 17 MR. LENGYEL: That's a reasonable 18 distance, but I would agree with Lourdes 19 that you would want the people -- I mean, CJ c 20 you got to protect the promenade, the C o V o.21 L 21 pedestrian atmosphere of that particular v co 22 spot. 23 MR. ARNAEZ: Are the two dropoffs E L 24 connected? = 0 tl 25 MS. GARCIA-TOLEDO: Excuse me? JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA U- 1 8 43 18 1 SLAZYK: MR. ARNAEZ: Are they connected? 2 MS. GARCIA-TOLEDO: The two dropoffs? from the 3 but it's going to reduce MR. ARNAEZ: Yeah.. You go in one 4 also the side and you drop off and drop off and go metered spaces that 5 Cd out the other side, or you have to come in 6 and come out and come in and come out? 7 V MS. GARCIA-TOLEDO: You never leave could be 8 the street. 9 MR. LENGYEL: It is not in the right 10 v of way, though, right? 11 MR. MS. SLAZYK: What it is is there's Could I explain the 12 going to be on street parking spaces there, 13 meters, and then they're going to be taking 14 23 the the be and what it actually is.� out sections where valet will 15 going. So you have to go in and then -- 16 MR. POLAKOFF: It's not cut out from 17 the sidewalk? 18 MS. SLAZYK: No, it's not cut out 19 from the sidewalk, but it's going to reduce 20 also the amount of metered spaces that d Cd 0) CD V 21 could be v � 22 MR. BEAMS: Could I explain the o C U 23 geometry and what it actually is.� 24 Actually, there is no parallel E o 25 parking on this side of Southwest Tenth U JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES MIAMI, FLORIDA U u8 E 1 Street. 2 Now, we are in fact adding all of the 3 parallel parking spaces. And so we're not 4 taking any away. We're adding the ones 5 that we show. 6 What we have is a space between 7 parallel parking spaces that we're adding 8 where people can drop people off and 9 thereby not block the street while they are 10 dropping people off. 11 Second -- 12 MR. POLAKOFF: Or dropping their car 13 off -- 14 MR. BEAME: Or dropping their car 15 off. 16 MR. POLAKOFF: -- or dropping their 17 car off for valet. 18 MR. BEAME: Second, we have set the 19 building back further than required by C , 20 code. We have a sidewalk that's about 25 E 21 feet wide. So if somebody is being dropped CL C: oC 0 a o 22 off at the curb, I don't see how it's going o o 23 to interfere with pedestrian movement when 24 we have a 20, 25 -foot wide sidewalk. 0 C6 2 25 MR. POLAKOFF: How much additional ^J JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA 45 JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA 1 lanes of traffic are there? Is that a two 2 way street or one way? 3 MR. LENGYEL: That was my next 4 question. 5 MS. GARCIA-TOLEDO: One way. 6 MR. POLAKOFF: I thought it was one 7 way. 8 MR. LENGYEL: South Miami is one way. 9 MR. BEAME: Right now this is a 10 two-way street. 11 MR. POLAKOFF: So if it is a two-way 12 street, how many lanes of traffic in each 13 direction? 14 MR. BEAME: One. 15 MR. LENGYEL: And it barely fits as 16 it is. You're going to have people 17 stopping to do valet. They're going to be 18 backed up -- listen to this. 19 How many feet is it from that first 9CO -� 20 dropoff to South Miami Avenue? c- c- E U 0 �. 21 MR. BEAME: This one? co oc .. c o 22 MR. LENGYEL: Yes, sir, c 0 � c 23 23 approximately. 4- } Y 24 MR. BEAMS: A hundred feet. 25 MR. LENGYEL: So if you had ten, 12 JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA • • 1 cars waiting. 2 MS. SLAZYK: 100 feet. About five to 3 six. 4 MR. LENGYEL: Six, five cars. 5 You're going to have people in South 6 Miami waiting to turn left and you're going 7 to have people coming out this way towards 8 South Miami waiting to turn left onto South 9 Miami, and I think that's going to create 10 havoc. 11 MR. POLAKOFF: Is there another place 12 to put this, for example, on South Miami 13 Avenue? 14 MS. SLAZYK: No. 15 MR. POLAKOFF: No. 16 CHAIRMAN BLACK: Okay. Let's -- 17 MS. GARCIA-TOLEDO: I think there's a 18 misunderstanding. There's two lanes of 19 traffic plus the third lane for parking. 20 MR. POLAKOFF: Two lanes is one lane 21 in each direction? 22 MS. GARCIA-TOLEDO: Right. And then 23 there is the parking lane, which is like a 24 third lane. 25 MR. POLAKOFF: If there's two lanes JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA W-1 47 1 in one direction plus parking is one thing. 2 MS. SLAZYK: And the length of the 3 valet dropoff is approximately three car 4 lengths, maybe four. Somewhere between 5 three and four. JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA U0- 18 6 MS. GARCIA-TOLEDO: I think it's 2.8. 7 MS. SLAZYK: So approximately three 8 cars. So, you know, unless the valet 9 service is the best in the City of Miami 10 that can get them out of there really 11 quick, the moment you've got more than 12 three you're backing up Tenth Street. 13 MR. LENGYEL: It's not a good spot. 14 MR. POLAKOFF: The only thing I'm 15 arguing the other way -- and I'm not sure 16 which way it works. I'm not confused on the 17 issue. I just haven't decided -- people 18 that are not going to use valet parking on 19 this street and are coming eastbound are v 4- J 'Q) 20 going to turn to the right before they get �`� a aEZ3 r 21 to the turnoff. It's self park, isn't it? Q o -= � U 22 MR. BEAMS: Yes. O 03: 23 MR. POLAKOFF: It's self park. s L 24 So if it's self park, it's probably n 0 E L RY „g is 25 one of those places where you punch and it JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA U0- 18 I S1 18 1 I mean, we automatically ejects the ticket and the 2 19 gate goes up and you go in. is clear. 3 How far is that gate in from the 4 street? Is it underneath there? 1� U � V C� 5 20 MR. BEAME: Yeah, it's in here. up and 6 MR. POLAKOFF: So you would have to 7 have five or six cars backed up just to -- 8 drop off your car and get to the MS. SLAZYK: The queuing, yeah. y 9 MR. POLAKOFF: To queue in. It's 10 unlikely you're going to back up into the 22 11 -- you know, street because all they're doing is -- a o o 12 MS. SLAZYK: By that point you're far 13 enough away from Miami Avenue that it's not 23 14 use this, the same impact as a hundred feet from C:� 15 Miami Avenue. 16 MR. POLAKOFF: I'm just trying to 24 17 do out there sort out -- 18 MS. SLAZYK: But, I mean, we looked 19 at it. The convenience is clear. I mean, 1� U � V C� o 20 the convenience being able to pull up and �� a C0 0 21 drop off your car and get to the y U 22 restaurant, that's very -- you know, most a o o 23 of the people coming to use this, these C:� 24 restaurants, the way we do out there today, U) 25 you know, you arrive in your car. Most of JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA I • 1 them don't have dropoff. You go park your 2 car and you walk into your restaurant. 3 You know, to back up traffic, you 4 know, to keep everybody waiting until this 5 queuing can kind of go, it seems excessive 6 for Brickell promenade, when, if somebody 7 really wants to, there is another place 8 they can do it or they can go into the 9 garage and they walk to their destination. 10 MS. GARCIA-TOLEDO: Let me also add 11 that as you heard Public Works, and we 12 agreed to that, we would have to, if this 13 is approved, go to Public Works and work 14 with them in obtaining the valet parking 15 permit. That is at the point in time of 16 exactly where the location would be. And 17 if they in fact feel we need more stacking 18 space and we need to move further away from 19 Miami Avenue, that would be done for this cv c 20 particular dropoff which is here. E m 21 MR. ARNAEZ: What's -- let me o �'- � � o U o 22 backtrack here. What's the distance c c o _ V 23 between two dropoffs? 24 MS. SLAZYK: Probably a couple of E o 0 E v3 � 25 hundred feet. JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA 0-,, E-1 • 1 MR. BEAME: Yeah, about 200 feet. 2 MR. ARNAEZ: 200 feet. Okay. Let's 3 say they don't want to give you the 4 dropoff. 5 Can you live with one dropoff? 6 MR. BEAME: No. 7 MR. POLAKOFF: They have a dropoff on 8 the other side. 9 MR. ARNAEZ: That's going to be their 10 main one. 11 I don't have any problem. 200 12 hundred feet is -- 13 MR. POLAKOFF: I don't either. 14 MR. ARNAEZ: -- 200 feet is a lot. 15 MS. GARCIA-TOLEDO: I think it's the 16 nature of the two dropoffs, like I said 17 before. The two uses are very different in 18 nature. 19 MR. ARNAEZ: You know, when you're 20 talking about dropoff, I mean, how many 21 people at one time are going to go there 22 and drop off their car? 23 MS. GARCIA-TOLEDO: Also, I think it 24 has to do with some of the big -name type 25 restaurants that we're trying to get into 50 JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORID t 1 -, U � s(� a �— U Q U o C S c � v a .a o C,O i JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORID t 1 -, 51 1 this neighborhood. 2 They often times require that there 3 be valet for their operation. And so in 4 order to get that higher -quality type 5 establishment that will particularly cater 6 to this neighborhood, we feel that we knee 7 to be competitive enough to be able to 8 offer them what they're accustomed to. 9 MR. ARNAEZ: You should give them an 10 option. 11 MS. GARCIA-TOLEDO: In some cases we 12 will end up losing a very good and very 13 recognizable name because of not having the 14 availability of having a valet dropoff 15 outside of their restaurant. 16 MR. McELROY: Mr. Chairman, I'd like 17 to make a motion on it, on the project. 18 CHAIRMAN BLACK: Let me make just one 19 statement and we will entertain that 20 motion. E _0 0 21 MS. SLAZYK: There's one objector. 22 CHAIRMAN BLACK: Oh, I'm sorry. a ® N }= 23 Excuse me. >- 24 MR. ECHEMENDIA: We have a full blown 25 presentation. JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA �,r 0� S 52 JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA U _ � 16t 1 CHAIRMAN BLACK: All right. I'm 2 sorry. 3 Would you go ahead and take this 4 podium? 5 MR. ECHEMENDIA: You want us to take 6 that one? 7 Lourdes is going to have to address 8 some issues. Maybe if staff stays there 9 and we can just bring these boards down and 10 they could do their rebuttal. 11 I'll defer to you. 12 CHAIRMAN BLACK: That's all right. 13 That's all right. I'm sorry. 14 Would you just go ahead and state -- 15 Vicky, have you completed your 16 presentation? 17 MS. GARCIA-TOLEDO: Excuse me? 18 CHAIRMAN BLACK: Have you completed 19 your presentation? .2 -co c c= CL r E 20 MS. GARCIA-TOLEDO: Yes, except for c o a�.aNl 21 time for rebuttal. c o o� 22 CHAIRMAN BLACK: Okay. Fine. All a � c � 23 right. a( ; S U E ' 24 Yes, sir. Would you just go ahead �',ta .' s 25 and state -- JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA U _ � 16t 53 JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA ��� 1 MR. ECHEMENDIA: Santiago Echemendia. 2 I'm with the law firm of Tew, Cardenas and 3 Rebak at 201 South Biscayne Boulevard, and 4 I'm representing Brickell Village Land 5 Company which is the adjoining property 6 owner immediately to the west. It is the 7 remainder of the block. 8 And I'll be short because it's late. 9 I'll defer to our architect who is the 10 expert. But we received a call from the 11 property owner saying that their property 12 was not treated with any sensitivity by the 13 adjoining property owner, and they were 14 very much concerned. 15 So we brought Robert Chisholm on 16 board who is a very well regarded architect 17 in this town to look at the treatment of 18 our adjoining property and to develop, to 19 attempt to develop in concert with the C. cv E. 20 applicant some sort of scheme that treated o� a�.o1 LJ 21 our property with more sensitivity. o c o 0 22 MR. POLAKOFF: Which is your C:oo� ti C: 23 adjoining property? Could you show us? E � U 24 MR. ECHEMENDIA: We are basically 25 we are right behind right behind the JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA ��� 54 U,CV E a m 01 LL co� � JUry � C � L 0 E co a JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA Go— iS8 1 parking garage. This is basically our 2 property line and it's the remainder of the 3 block. 4 MR. POLAKOFF: Okay. Got it. 5 MR. ECHEMENDIA: We own 37,000 square 6 feet. We've assembled 95 percent of that 7 remaining block and we have contracts on 8 the difference. 9 At this point what I'd like to do -- 10 and again, we've met with on a number of 11 occasions -- we've met twice with the 12 applicants. We've developed a scheme. Our 13 intent was not to derail the project. On 14 the I it contrary. think certainly 15 benefits our property to have this project 16 go forward but rather to see if there were 17 workable or alternatives. 18 The architects -- our architect has 19 come up with a scheme. It's been presented 20 to them. And it seems as though the 21 inflexibility is not so much on the part of 22 the architects but on the part of the 23 principals of the developer for aesthetic 24 reasons, for other reasons, but not so much 25 that you can't redesign the site to make 54 U,CV E a m 01 LL co� � JUry � C � L 0 E co a JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA Go— iS8 • • • 1 the treatment of our site a little more 2 sensitive but rather there seems to be some 3 inflexibility on the site of one of the 4 principals in particular, as I understand 5 it. 6 So without -- so as not to waste your 7 time, at this point I'd like for Robert 8 Chisholm to make his presentation, and then 9 I would like to conclude to walk you 10 through some of the legal or procedural 11 issues as to how we would like for you to 12 issue your recommendation to allow this to 13 go forward but with a particular condition. 14 MR. CHISHOLM: Good evening, ladies 15 and gentlemen. My name is Robert Chisholm. 16 I'm president of R.E. Chisholm Architects, 17 Inc. We're located at 7254 Southwest 48th 18 Street in Miami. 19 We were brought aboard by the 20 Brickell Village Land Company, our client, 21 late last week, and we were asked to take a 22 look at the situation that Mr. Echemendia 23 just spoke about. 24 And with the permission of our 25 colleagues at the Beame partnership, and JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORID 55 UAV e CL �— o a�.o� COOS U a E S Q E k 1 with all respect for what they're doing on 2 their project which is, I might add, a 3 very, very nice project, we looked at the 4 existing situation which you see here. 5 These are very quick sketches. Their 6 project hotel is located at this point, and 7 essentially is -- conceptually sort of 8 forms a backdrop to their whole element, 9 their whole development here, their whole 10 retail concept. 11 And then you see on the west side, 12 extreme west side of their project forming 13 the anchor ending, if you will, designwise, 14 which is quite nice, et cetera. 15 If we were to put our proposed 16 project, which would be composed of ground 17 level retail, parking, office, condos and a 18 part hotel condos as well, we would be 19 totally blocked with approximately 80 some 3 E COO 20 odd to a hundred feet maximum distance v oil (D 21 between the two structures. o c c W C o 22 To give you an idea, I believe from M "� 23 here to here, from wall to wall, there's .c �c°,E 24 about 60 feet or so, maybe a little bit 25 more. So it's just another bay over.. It's JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA CJ C 1 pretty close between the two buildings. 2 So again, with all respect and 3 deference to our colleagues, we came up 4 with just one possibility. If we swung the 5 hotel in this direction with the axis 6 running from east to west, we would still, 7 as you can see, form the backdrop to very 8 similar in concept and achieving the same 9 end result to their project. This is just 10 one possible alternative. 11 What we wanted to do was see how we 12 could work together in a cooperative 13 fashion to reach a consensus because of the 14 severe nature and possibility of the effect 15 that their current proposal has on our 16 client's property and potential project. 17 And that is basically the situation, 18 ladies and gentlemen. 19 Thank you. 20 CHAIRMAN BLACK: Thank you. 21 MR. McELROY: Mr. Chairman, I have a 22 question on our site map. 23 Is this incorrect, this site plan? 24 This site plan shows that the property 25 goes -- and this is what I was looking 57 JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA U- 45 U m n • C7 1 at -- to First Avenue? It goes from South 2 Miami to First Avenue. Are we talking this 3 piece in the back section? 4 MR. POLAKOFF: We're talking about 5 this. 6 CHAIRMAN BLACK: Directly to the 7 west. 8 MR. McELROY: See this. Okay. 9 There. It shows on our site plan -- 10 MR. POLAKOFF: Next page. 11 MR. McELROY: And this is the 12 property right here that Mr. Chisholm is 13 speaking about? 14 MS. SLAZYK: To the west. 15 MR. POLAKOFF: Yes. 16 MR. CHISHOLM: Our property is 17 directly to the west. 18 MR. McELROY: To the west. 19 I was looking at the wrong site page 20 before and it showed me that it was going 21 all the way down to First right behind the 22 financial building. 23 MR. MANNER: Mr. Chairman, may I ask 24 a question? 25 Your contention is that this JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA G0- 488 JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA U�- 59 1 configuration is blocking a sight line from 2 South Miami Avenue towards the west. 3 MR. ECHEMENDIA: No, towards the 4 east. Basically the project turns its back 5 on our property entirely. 6 MR. MANNER: You know, if I was 7 standing on South Miami Avenue and I was 8 facing west, I would be facing your 9 property, correct? 10 MR. POLAKOFF: Yes. 11 MR. MANNER: So you're objecting to a 12 view from standing on South Miami Avenue 13 facing the west that I would not be able to 14 see your project? 15 MR. POLAKOFF: Well, he's objecting 16 to the fact that his project as built is 17 cut off from any access to the east and 18 he's cut off -- 19 MR. ECHEMENDIA: That is correct. 20 They have basically turned their back 21 entirely on our site and put a 48 -foot 22 wall, which is the parking garage, 23 immediately on our property line, and then 24 they go up another -- I believe they go up 25 to 29 stories with absolutely no side JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA U�- 59 MCI JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA GO- 188 1 setbacks. 2 MR. MANNER: But you have quite a bit 3 of access along -- what would that be? 4 That would be Southwest First Avenue? 5 MR. POLAKOFF: They have access from 6 the north. 7 MR. ECHEMENDIA: It's not so much an 8 access issue. It's an issue -- Mr. Manner, 9 if you could -- maybe if I could just 10 finish my presentation for a second and 11 I'll just tell you kind of what our 12 concerns are. 13 One of the requirements of this board 14 as it reviews a Major Use Special Permit is 15 the criteria in 1305.08, and it includes, 16 and I'll just kind of paraphrase, pick up 17 some pieces, but where potentially adverse 18 effects shall be given to surrounding 19 properties, and we're potentially -- it's s 20 difficult to read this like this. o. �10U o �� 0— � LL ._ 21 Including screening, buffering, landscaping -E-0 22 of buildings, relocating a proposed space, . v 23 alteration of user space or such other JN; •E -v 24 measures as are required to assure that V,��/� J L i 25 such potentially adverse effects will be JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA GO- 188 61 JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA - .168 1 eliminated or somewhat reduced so that 2 there's more compatibility with the 3 adjoining property. 4 We have an expert architect that is 5 renown in this city who feels, and his 6 expert opinion is, that the treatment of 7 the adjoining property is insensitive, 8 and I think the applicants -- the 9 architects for the applicant would be hard 10 pressed to concede the same thing because 11 they're representing the applicant, but if 12 they were being objective, they would 13 probably concede the same point. 14 The adjoining property, the project 15 completely turns its back on our site and 16 puts a 48 -foot wall plus an additional up 17 to 29 stories, I believe, immediately in 18 our property line. It's actually the 48 19 feet and then it juts up. It juts toward•` -'V ro 20 the east, I believe, 80 feet. 3: E n o i° 21 MR. POLAKOFF: Are you claiming a o c c o o� 22 right to a view? .o " 23 MR. ECHEMENDIA: No, we are not E L 24 claiming a right to a view. 25 Our point is compatibility and JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA - .168 62 JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA U* i s's 1 insensitivity of treatment. You're 2 supposed to look at how adjoining 3 properties are treated. 4 MR. POLAKOFF: Wasn't this settled by 5 the Florida Supreme Court, again, I'll 6 remind you, in Eden Roc versus 7 Fontainebleau? 8 MR. McELROY: This is a whole 9 different thing. You're talking about 10 right on the setback. 11 MR. POLAKOFF: Sight and view and 12 light and axis is what he's talking about. 13 He has every right to build this 14 project. 15 MR. ECHEMENDIA: Mr. Polakoff -- 16 CHAIRMAN BLACK: Go ahead and 17 conclude and then we'll deal with those 18 things later. 19 MR. ECHEMENDIA: Just to briefly, and 20 you're absolutely right, Eden Roc stands = 30 E a) U L 21 for the proposition that -- 0 k i 22 MR. POLAKOFF: I want you to make a a� C C no ON c� 23 distinction for us, why this instance is c� 24 not that case. E 0 E 25 MR. ECHEMENDIA: Right. We are not � C JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA U* i s's 63 1 arguing that we want a view corridor, and 2 we understand and I'm very familiar with 3 the case law and understand that under the 4 case law you're not entitled to a view 5 corridor. 6 Notwithstanding that, this board is 7 charged with attempting to ensure that 8 there is compatibility with adjoining JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA r 9 properties. 10 And I think it is easy to argue and 11 easy to concede that indeed putting your 12 back on the adjoining property could have a 13 serious, devaluating effect on our property 14 doesn't treat and sensitively our property. 15 Again, contextualize this. I mean, 16 our intent is not to derail the property. 17 We were trying to work cooperatively to 18 come up with a scheme that works for them 19 and also doesn't deleteriously affect our U_ (3 C 20 property, not so much the view but simply r Q)C) �- C- of o >, w._ 21 the compatibility and not having a 50 -foot �(� �, U garage right on our property line backing o�22 Coo 23 onto our property. Q E E ;al 24 MR. POLAKOFF: But there are within 00 E 25 the setback requirements. JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA r 0 0 64 1 MR. ECHEMENDIA: There is no setback 2 requirement, and they will tell you there 3 is no setback requirement. 4 Notwithstanding that -- JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA 5 MR. POLAKOFF: Zero is the setback 6 requirement. 7 MR. ECHEMENDIA: That is correct. 8 CHAIRMAN BLACK: Okay. 9 MR. ECHEMENDIA: Notwithstanding 10 that, it is important for this board to 11 look at whether the adjoining property is 12 deemed obsolete. 13 You know, if you put this building it 14 right on our property line, could be 15 that -- it could very well be and we think 16 and we have a professional opinion that 17 says that it will devalue our property, and 18 we're trying to reach a consensus that is 19 workable to both parties. v c 20 It's important. I'm trying to drive o o U W cc LL U 21 this home because we're not here to derail y gr 22 the project. This project benefits our C0 C o U 23 property provided that it treats it with c, E �- 24 sensitivity. That's all we're trying to 0 �ga/� 25 accomplish. p JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA M" 1 MR. MANNER: The condition that 2 you're asking for is? 3 MR. ECHEMENDIA: I'll get to that in 4 a second. JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA 5 It's very interesting that you even 6 have Mr. Bermello here who is the adjoining 7 property owner who came with the Major Use 8 Special Permit right before you, that when 9 he saw our proposed relocation, he said, 10 wait a second. I may have to object 11 because then that may potentially be 12 incompatible with our adjoining property, 13 with our project. 14 And it's issue It's not an of sight. 15 an issue of compatibility. 16 And I think that highlights the very 17 issue of trying to have a synergy between 18 these or among these projects so that there 19 is compatibility. E r EU 20 The condition that we propose, and I a).0 ` v U 21 think in light of the fact that CD o c c .�+ W C:0 O 22 Mr. Bermello potentially expressed a 011 23 concern regarding this particular design -- E °p � 6 E 24 MR. LENGYEL: Mr. Chairman, how tall, 25 how many floors is your project going to JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA M.- 1 be? 2 CHAIRMAN BLACK: They don't know. 3 MR. LENGYEL: You have no idea? 4 MR. ECHEMENDIA: We don't know yet. 5 The architect has just been retained to 6 design the project. His charge was 7 two -fold: To look at alternatives and to JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLOR DA r 8 concurrently design our project. 9 You will be told by the applicant 10 that, you know, disregard -- the fact that 11 they're the first in the pipeline and that 12 this project is about to come to fruition 13 and the fact that we're simply an adjoining 14 that doesn't have before property a plan 15 you minimizes your consideration of the 16 adjoining property. 17 That's not the case. Your purview 18 includes adjoining properties, not simply v a 19 adjoining projects. a E` 20 And I will conclude but, you know, 21 bear with me because this is an important 0a a c U o 0 3: 22 issue. � c � 23 The condition that we were originally g Y E � E co 24 going to propose that we discussed with 25 staff earlier today -- we met with Lourdes, JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLOR DA r 67 1 presented her our scheme. Since she had 2 not seen it before, she certainly would not 3 support our scheme or object to it but 4 simply wanted to take it up with the 5 planning director and have more of an 6 opportunity to look at it, but one of the 7 concerns of the applicant that we wanted to 8 address is to make sure that this project 9 would not be protracted; that is, that it 10 would not be delayed, that we would allow 11 it to go forward. 12 One of the issues that was raised is 13 if we develop this other scheme, we're 14 going to have to file a new Major Use 15 Special Permit. We're going to be delayed 16 four to six months. 17 In fact, however, you can approve the 18 Major Use Special Permit application with a Q cu 19 condition that the hotel be reoriented as cL c r% o o,y ti 20 we are proposing. a� eco 21 Alternatively, you can continue the 06 CD .cN 22 matter to the February 16th meeting so that L 23 we can have a little more time to work with Co a 24 the applicant and with Mr. Bermello to make 25 sure that the schemes work with all three JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA RIM U V C 3 1' E r o c c at c o c�J •E $ U E co 0 4.1 1 sites, and we would implore you to allow us 2 at least that opportunity. 3 We think that this board's 4 recommendation is very important and don't 5 want to short shift ourselves or this board 6 by simply saying, oh, we can address these 7 issues before we go in front of the 8 commission. 9 So at this point I would request -- I 10 don't think it's a hardship to the 11 applicant to defer till the February 16th 12 date. They'll tell you that the whole deal 13 is going to unravel. I would like for them how it 14 to submit substantive evidence on 15 would unravel if it gets deferred two or 16 three weeks. But in consideration for the 17 adjoining property owner, the valid 18 concerns that we're raising, our spirit of 19 cooperation in trying to develop a scheme 20 that works for everybody, including the 21 Grand project, we would urge you to at 22 least afford us an opportunity to have the 23 architects look at these alternatives a 24 little more closely before you make a 25 recommendation to the City Commission. JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA RIM U V C 3 1' E r o c c at c o c�J •E $ U E co 0 4.1 16 1 Thank you. 17 2 MR. McELROY: Mr. Chairman, I'd like 18 3 to make a statement. 19 4 I have to bring up something, too. 5 U t� cis I've talked to the attorney. I have worked 20 6 E with Bob Chisholm on several projects 7 a. c before, one with the Archdiocese of Miami 21 8 t' s � in a large development program, and I just 9 wanted to bring it up. I haven't worked 22 10 ..�C6.r . o o3; with Bob in maybe seven years or so. Seven 11 or eight years it's been since our last 23 12 c project together. 24 13 o CHAIRMAN BLACK: Okay. MR. I'd like bring it 25 14 McELROY: to 15 up. 16 CHAIRMAN BLACK: We have -- Vicky, do 17 you want time to rebuttal now? 18 MS. GARCIA-TOLEDO: Yes, please. 19 I would like -- there's someone else U t� cis 20 here who needs to speak on the project, so E U a. c 21 perhaps before my rebuttal. t' s � _ 22 MR. BERMELLO: Mr. Chairman, my name ..�C6.r . o o3; 23 is Willy Bermello, BAP Development, with c 24 offices at 2601 South Bayshore Drive. o ; 25 Like Mr. Echemendia, I'm all for JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA ,U 16 1 compatibility and for this project. 2 As a form of a confession, one of the 3 things that attracted us to the site that 4 you approved previously was the fact that 5 Constructa Properties was looking seriously 6 into the Brickell area to bring to it the 7 excitement, the vitality, the charm, the 8 turn around magnetism that I think they've 9 done for Coconut Grove, that they would 10 pull that same magic in the Brickell area. 11 I still have the same confidence and I'm 12 pulling for them that they in fact will do 13 that. 70 U co �r o LL om CO �0 c o E o n E �u JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA ;- A3 14 I think that hearing you're some 15 valid comments from Mr. Echemendia. He's 16 trying to protect the development rights 17 for his client. They're assembling land 18 and trying to see what they could do to 19 prevent something that they see as maybe 20 harmful to their interest. 21 We are in a little bit of a different 22 position. We are not in the process of 23 starting to assemble land and think about 24 the future. In our case the train left the 25 station. 70 U co �r o LL om CO �0 c o E o n E �u JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA ;- A3 71 1 There are a couple of things that are 2 interesting here. Because Bob Chisholm 3 and I are like brothers and I respect him 4 highly. Amongst the mutual respect and 5 admiration that we have for each other 6 professionally, we also happen to sit on 7 the same board that approved this project 8 that you have before you. 9 I mention that so that the city 10 attorney in terms of -- if this presents 11 any conflict of interest. And I don't 12 think either he or appearing before you as 13 members of the UDRB, but if the record is 14 researched, obviously, you would see that 15 we both are and that we both voted for this 16 project for approval as you see it here 17 tonight. 18 The building that is under question 19 here is the hotel, and although hotels you = E ami � U 20 think about views, from our perspective our o,(,LLv 21 project is a residential apartment, and o o o 22 people that live there 365 days out of the -a a� ._ri i� 23 year are usually given more consideration .� 0 CO 24 than somebody that may be stopping over; 25 there for an evening's night. JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA y . r 72 1 So our concern with views and facing 2 are -- have a little bit of a more 3 importance maybe than a hotel and possibly 4 some other use that today doesn't exist. 5 Our property faces and our principal 6 entrance is on Tenth Street, and our 7 building doesn't abut, does not back up to 8 the property that's just being presented, 9 the project that's being presented to you. 10 I just did a very quick sketch to try 11 to highlight the differences between what 12 we're talking about. I hope you can all 13 see my unfortunate quick sketch here in 14 light blue pen. But the rectangle you see 15 in A, and I'm not counting the little 16 portion that they have on the other side of 17 Miami Avenue, is this project, the Brickell 18 Walk, Cocowalk project. 19 Our property is B. We face onto A. t c 20 We are looking directly across the street. .c o L 21 Mr. Echemendia's property that he's �� 22 representing they back up into it. Their o 23 rear property line adjoins this project. 24 It's not the front. It's their rear. I Is 25 think there's a little bit of difference. ' JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORDNA0 73 1 There's no doubt that any project 2 could be redesigned, just like I'm sure Bob 3 could also do a second scheme in his. 4 If we look at numbers, we have 95,000 5 square feet. They have 37,000 square feet. 6 I don't think that's the issue. 7 I think this is an issue that has 8 been thought over, discussed and at least 9 approved by one other city board. 10 If it's the wishes -- I'm always 11 available to work and help, and we will 12 work and we will follow your wishes if 13 those are your wishes to continue -- 14 hopefully, delay this you won't group -- we 15 will make ourselves available. 16 But I do want to leave it on the 17 record that the sketch that is presented as 18 an option would be harmful to our project 19 because basically would take the entire c �0Ea' 20 hotel that right now they have it facing on n c (' o � LL 21 a north -south axis and would put it " m K tl c o 22 parallel to our front, not to our back, c o -a 0 a) c 23 right in front of us. .., E 24 And obviously, we would object to co 22.2 25 that and we would hope that you don't ask JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORDNA0 74 15 And we have absolutely no problem 16 with the issues that were being discussed 17 before. 18 And just for the record, with the 19 bridge, Tenth Street is a narrow street and a � p 20 unless certain measures are taken into o L m L 21 account, like the applicant has to allow c Cc 0 _ o 22 people to get on and off, there will be o ol 23 backups and that could be a problem. E L .�o 0 E 24 So I encourage you to support their co 25 application as presented here tonight. JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORI��DttA �i— X88 1 the applicant to change their application 2 as suggested. 3 There may be something else that we 4 might not have a problem with. 5 And again, we will work with 6 everybody in the neighborhood. We think 7 that neighborhood is too important for 8 there to be devisiveness or opposition 9 between property owners and I think issues 10 of conformance are valid. I wish these 11 issues might have been brought up a few 12 months back, but I thought it would be 13 important for the record just to make these 14 points. 15 And we have absolutely no problem 16 with the issues that were being discussed 17 before. 18 And just for the record, with the 19 bridge, Tenth Street is a narrow street and a � p 20 unless certain measures are taken into o L m L 21 account, like the applicant has to allow c Cc 0 _ o 22 people to get on and off, there will be o ol 23 backups and that could be a problem. E L .�o 0 E 24 So I encourage you to support their co 25 application as presented here tonight. JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORI��DttA �i— X88 75 1 Thank you very much. 2 CHAIRMAN BLACK: Thank you. 3 MS. GARCIA-TOLEDO: Let me first of 4 all correct a couple of -- a bit of 5 misinformation on the record. 6 This concept that you're seeing here 7 has never been presented to us, to the 8 development team. 9 A Xerox copy of a portion of it was 10 shared with our architects less than 24 11 hours ago. 12 I explained to Mr. Echemendia the 13 partnership that is developing this site is 14 spread out as far as Paris, France and Sao 15 Paulo, Brazil. We can not turn around a 16 decision in a moment's notice. That's 17 number one. 18 Number two, the sketch that was 19 presented to our architect has absolutelyv v �p 20 no dimensions, no analysis -- therefore, we o�_• 21 cannot perform an analysis. Not only can o Cc 0 Cco� _ ory 22 we not perform it in 24 hours and get to -0 0 23 all of our partners within 24 hours but E L = U E 24 without any dimensions we are precluded 25 from being able to even figure out if this JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA a • • • 1 would work. 2 We are willing to continue to sit 3 down and talk with our neighbors. 4 In fact, a similar condition was 5 requested from the Zoning Board. 6 The Zoning Board approved this 7 project unanimously and did not place any 8 condition. And even though a condition was 9 not placed, we continued and have had 10 subsequent meetings and communication with 11 them. 12 We will have six weeks between this 13 board and the City Commission meeting in 14 which we can continue to go through those 15 analyses. 16 You heard that there was a potential 17 detriment and there was no real specific of 18 what that detriment would be other than 19 Mr. Manner picked up on the issue of they 20 complain to our wall on our property line, 21 the solid wall for our garage. 22 Let me say that their proposal that 23 you have before you has the same exact wall 24 in the back of their garage backing up 25 against our wall with the only difference JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA 76 11 77 16 1 that their parking deck, their wall, is an 2 17 entire level higher than ours. 3 This is the back of house. 18 4 Further, that wall has to be solid 5 because it becomes a firewall. We cannot �v 6 c have openings; we can not have any 19 7 penetration. It has to have specific E 8 thickness. That's the way the Zoning Code 9 0 of the City of Miami and the South Florida 20 10 Building Code requires it. All we're doing 11 21 is following the law. oc�co c 12 MR. McELROY: Excuse me. That's only 22 13 (D.- if you build on zero lot line. 14 23 MS. GARCIA-TOLEDO: On the lot .0 o F zero 15 U) line. 16 MR. McELROY: But if you build any 17 other way, the firewall changes. 18 MS. GARCIA-TOLEDO: The problem is �v c 19 that we cannot -- the problem is that we �: v E U 0 20 cannot build any other way because your v` U 21 code at Section 607 for SD -7, which is this oc�co c o 22 district, specifically requires minimal (D.- 23 yards with high percentage of lot coverage .0 o F U) 24 and heavy pedestrian usage, and it 25 particularly requires no separation between JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA 0- 0•a JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA 0--� 1 inside yards. 2 So that when you're standing 3 consistent with urban development, when you 4 walk on the sidewalk, you have continuous 5 retail all the way down. 6 If the city was to put a setback of, 7 let's say, ten feet on this line and 8 required that from us and ten feet for 9 them, you would end up with a canyon of ten 10 feet or it would look like an abandoned 11 alleyway, no man's land. And that's 12 specifically prohibited by SD -7 and by 13 urban requirements in the city. 14 The hotel tower which sits on this 15 pedestal, which is the parking deck, does 16 have a 45 -foot setback from their property. 17 Also, the hotel tower, because it's 18 double loaded, it's not a solid, blank 19 wall. We have rooms with windows and =0 C .Ld ' t E m 20 balconies and full treatment the same as a r o U c o t LL v 21 you see from the front of the property if� 22 you were standing in South Miami. o� r -o r 23 So I think whoever caught the issue � E.� c t L 24 here hit the nail on the head. This is " 25 about views. JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA 0--� M01 1 And you see that they're not opposed 2 to our project. Our density is one fifth 3 of what we could build. Certainly, it's 4 just a matter of their desire to have a 5 view to the east, but they do have a 6 frontage on First Avenue, on Ninth Street 7 and on Tenth Street. 8 MR. LENGYEL: Mr. Chairman? many feet was the tower offset off the JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORID6k 1118 8 8 9 CHAIRMAN BLACK: Yes. 10 MR. LENGYEL: I think that's exactly 11 right, and I've been waiting to ask that 12 question, which was what was the -- how 13 many feet was the tower offset off the 14 And it's 45 feet. garage. 15 We heard earlier that it's about 80 16 feet between the back of that building 17 and the where the other building would 18 start. Am I correct? That's about 120 19 feet or thereabouts. I think that's 3 = E w U 20 adequate and sufficient. o- i V Q). - a? 21 We should not continue this and we o o ca- c 22 should have a motion right now. 0n ' c 23 CHAIRMAN BLACK: We have to conclude -a 00 E 24 this. 25 MR. McELROY: Let me ask. They have JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORID6k 1118 8 8 .e 1 elevations on all three sides, but they 2 don't have elevations on that one side. 3 They don't show an elevation on that side. 4 They show a side, they show a side 5 elevation on that side. 6 So you're saying -- 7 MR. ECHEMENDIA: 88 feet, for the 8 record, 88 feet is the distance, not 125. 9 MR. LENGYEL: Plus the offset of 40, 10 though, makes it about 128. 11 MR. McELROY: Is that a solid, that's 12 a solid wall going up. 13 MS. GARCIA-TOLEDO: No. 14 MR. McELROY: Not the tower. On the 15 garage it's one solid wall. 16 MS. GARCIA-TOLEDO: On both of our 17 projects, yes. 18 MR. McELROY: On both of the � a v co 19 projects. a C /` o 20 MS. GARCIA-TOLEDO: Correct, back to 21 back. 0 0 v� 22 MR. McELROY: A parking garage going 23 straight up. a v E co 24 MS. GARCIA-TOLEDO: Correct, except 25 their parking garage is one story taller JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA 16 I think staff will tell you -- 17 MR. McELROY: This is something that 18 we just went through on the Atlantis 19 project. Everybody is talking that it's so 20 close that they're just facing each other. 21 That in design, I mean, can't we come up 22 with better designs where we don't have to, 23 you know, build towers that just, you know 24 simulate each other right down the road? 25 MS. SLAZYK: A tower has to face M. JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA �- J_0 ®1 1 than ours. 2 MR. McELROY: That's not here nor 3 there. 4 Then it's going to be two buildings 5 how many feet apart? They're going to be a 6 hundred feet apart just facing each other? 7 MS. GARCIA-TOLEDO: The towers. 8 MR. McELROY: Two towers. We're 9 going to have two towers a hundred foot 10 apart just looking at each other? 11 MS. GARCIA-TOLEDO: Correct. 12 MR. POLAKOFF: Sideways. 13 MS. GARCIA-TOLEDO: That's the urban 14 concept, and we have them all throughout 15 Miami. 16 I think staff will tell you -- 17 MR. McELROY: This is something that 18 we just went through on the Atlantis 19 project. Everybody is talking that it's so 20 close that they're just facing each other. 21 That in design, I mean, can't we come up 22 with better designs where we don't have to, 23 you know, build towers that just, you know 24 simulate each other right down the road? 25 MS. SLAZYK: A tower has to face M. JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA �- J_0 ®1 X" 1 something, and if there's one next door, 2 that's what it's going to face. 3 In most of downtown the reason for 4 the zero setbacks is so the towers will 5 actually be up against each other and 6 create an urban edge. JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORI r 7 MR. MCELROY: On that. Okay. But 8 we're not going all the way up where they 9 adjoin like that, and that's why there was 10 curves and triangles and rectangles and 11 everything else was designed so we can get 12 different views at different angles and get 13 different perspectives. That is like all 14 the way down Brickell Avenue. 15 Every one of those buildings has a 16 different symmetrical shape and looks very 17 pleasant when you go down and it doesn't 18 look like one tower abutting another tower 19 all the way down. v = 20 Here we have one big wall across the c� o 21 street that we just approved. Then we're (t LL a5 22 going to have an alley. We're going to c 0 23 have one big L there and then we're going EcV °E -� 24 to have another block in front of it. o E 25 We have to think what the view is, JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORI r 11 too. 2 What is the view now from the 3 Metrorail looking over towards Brickell 4 Avenue? 5 It's going to be one straight wall 6 going down. 7 I mean, try to -- I think you need to 8 try to foresee the views and what we're 9 going to look at over here now when we 10 create buildings against buildings. This 11 is going to come up a lot to this board. 12 As that area closes in, you know, do we 13 want our buildings, you know, right 14 alongside each other or do we want to have 15 some space if we can create space in 16 between them. 17 MR. POLAKOFF: I think we should ask 18 the planning department what is the purpose 19 and the intent of the overlay in this area, 20 which answers a lot of your questions. 21 MS. SLAZYK: It's the urban concept. 22 The buildings are meant to be close 23 together. cc 3: 1 E V 0 Cook U� a C 1 .M E cc 2 JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA GU- �8Is 24 Because if you require side setbacks 25 in an urban area, then what you're going to cc 3: 1 E V 0 Cook U� a C 1 .M E cc 2 JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA GU- �8Is 1 13 get is these narrow, little alleys in 2 between buildings that just pile up 3 garbage. I mean, they're meant to be 4 Wait I'm butted up against each other. 5 And if you look downtown even, you're 6 MR. going to see buildings that are, you know, 7 20 stories tall that have a complete blank 8 15 wall on one side because something is 9 supposed to come next to it there. That's 10 how cities are built. That is the urban 11 POLAKOFF: Sorry. concept. 12 MR. POLAKOFF: But to follow up, I JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA V- -A f88 13 just -- Wait I'm 14 MR. McELROY: a second. not 15 finished, Mr. Polakoff. 16 MR. POLAKOFF: Sorry. 17 MR. McELROY: You know, when you 18 have -- but downtown -- if the building had 19 one straight wall going up, but the V c0 20 building does not have one straight wall Q C 0 o U 01 u- 21 going up. It only has one straight wall o c c •r c o � 22 going up the garage. 23 Do we have that downtown? .E L 24 MS. SLAZYK: Yes, that exists in g 25 downtown. You know, that's the -- JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA V- -A f88 0 25 II MR. MANNER: Could you identify JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA 85 1 MR. McELROY: You said what the 2 concept was, to go all the way up. You 3 didn't say the concept was to go up part of 4 the way for a parking garage and then 5 switch when you get up to the office 6 building or the tower. 7 MR. McDOWELL: If I might give you a 8 particular example. One Biscayne Tower and 9 the SunTrust International Building right 10 behind it do exactly that. They have 11 retail at the ground level. They have a 12 parking structure. They abut each other 13 with zero space in between. They go up the 14 same level. And then the two office towers 15 sit on top of those pedestals with space 16 between the two office towers, and that is 17 the way this district is designed. 18 MR. McELROY: And What did they o 19 create in between those two office towers? no E U o U- 20 They created an architectural design. d v o c c 0 21 MR. McDOWELL: There is space they So � 22 have used.' c� 23 The one thing I would say to you is 00 E 24 you have had -- 0 25 II MR. MANNER: Could you identify JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA 18 1 yourself, sir, please? 2 MR. McDOWELL: I apologize. on the other side of their property that 3 My name is Carter McDowell. Vicky 4 did note my name earlier for the record. 5 Mr. Chisholm stood up and said 20 6 they were worried that our tower, which 0) 7 does sit between 45 and 55 feet back from 8 their property line, would be too close to v 9 their building. 10 One of the board members correctly 22 11 point out and Willy also pointed out that 12 the front of their property is not toward 13 us, it is in the other direction. 23 14 And on top of having the street in 15 front, which is what their real frontage looked at designs similar to what 16 is, they enjoy the fact that they have 17 Metrorail there. 18 So they have a permanent open space 19 on the other side of their property that 20 is, I think, about 150 to 200 feet wide as 3:1 0) U aor �. v 21 they view west out of their building. 22 Okay. We have oriented and we've o c c 0 23 worked on this design for two years. We've 24 looked at designs similar to what E o-" 00 E U) 25 Mr. Chisholm has come up with in the last JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA rr�� 6i0—C7 : 1 two days. You heard he started on this 2 project late last week. He's had two or 3 three days to look at it. We've been 4 working at it for two years. 5 The orientation of our building is 6 very intentional. It's intentional not to 7 have our tower lined up one across the 8 street from Willy's project you just 9 approved. JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA��yy 10 In fact, we turn our narrow side 11 toward his building intentionally. We 12 create a low level, two-story,'effectively 13 open pedestrian retail frontage, that his 14 building looks out over. 15 It was -- we understood what 16 they were doing. We've watched this 17 neighborhood for a long time. 18 If we were to turn, as they have 19 suggested, our tower and put it where they = o C E 20 have suggested on Tenth Street -- n c r o U- 21 MR. McELROY: What they suggest is m C: o 22 not necessary. 01 1 23 MR. McDOWELL: -- do you know what L 24 the dimension would be between our tower = o E 25 Willy Bermello's Tower? JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA��yy M.: 1 Less than the space between our tower 2 and the building they have proposed on 3 their property. The street is narrower 4 than the space that would be created 5 between our tower and their tower on their 6 property. 7 MR. McELROY: No one is saying this 8 is a correct design, but sensitivity is 9 what we're saying, sensitivity to the 10 property adjacent to your property, 11 sensitivity. 12 You are building all of your tower to 13 one end of your property. 90 percent of 14 your project is on one end of the property. 15 To me your property is not being sensitive 16 to your neighbor. 17 MR. McDOWELL: What we tried to do -- 18 MR. McELROY: I didn't know that that 19 piece of property went all the way through. S? co-� E U 20 When I was discussing this, I saw a o -c — o o U- � 21 site plan that showed your piece of o 22 property going all the way to First Street c � c 23 I didn't look at that site plan. I looked 24 at two pages prior to that. I didn't step 00 EL CD 25 back. And I was looking at the prior site JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA ,.' 89 1 plan, so I didn't realize that your 2 property didn't go all the way through. 3 MR. McDOWELL: We apologize if there 4 was any confusion based on our submittal. 5 MR. MANNER: Mr. Chairman, this is 6 not the point to be argumentative here. 7 We're here to find out what the facts are. 8 We're not here to argue about design. 9 MS. TABARES-FERNANDEZ: We're not 10 discussing design. 11 MR. McELROY: We're not discussing 12 design. We're discussing sensitivity to 13 the man's piece of property and the value 14 of the property. 15 MR. MANNER: You're being 16 argumentative with the applicant. 17 CHAIRMAN BLACK: What I think is in 18 our best interest right now -- okay.' v 19 Mr. Manner, one moment. Let's do this: o r L L,- w try �B U 20 Let the applicant finish up, conclude o c o l C O� 21 that, and then we'll go ahead and have -� " � c l 22 discussion. .E v 23 Mr. Chisholm, we'll get to a CZ 24 decision. 0 25 II MS. GARCIA-TOLEDO: I would just like JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA 610- M JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA 60- L68 1 to make a point we have had sensitivity, 2 and in fact what we did is on top of our 3 parking deck where we set back our hotel 4 tower 45 feet, we put all the amenities on 5 their side of the property so when they 6 build their building and it has a view 7 towards our building, they will not be 8 looking at the roof; they'll be looking at 9 our amenities. So we specifically put our 10 amenities where we could have put them on 11 our shopping side so that people who are 12 sunbathing can look over our plaza, we 13 specifically put it on the west side and 14 utilized that 45 -foot setback of our tower 15 to create trellises and planters and 16 amenities for the hotel. 17 So we have here the same situation 18 that exists on the bay between the Grand 19 and the Marriott where the amenities are E U m CL 0 20 created and it almost creates a park -like .. U L U 21 atmosphere between the two towers. c o c o 22 MR. McELROY: I just have one more -o 23 comment. E o �' 24 You have a great project but you also s 25 will suffer, I believe, in the back, on JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA 60- L68 91 JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA GO- ��� 1 that one area on the back of the tower and members of the 2 because your view will be the same, will ordinance in place that 3 have the same problem. Okay. It won't be 4 just the building behind you. 5 I realize that your building, too, 6 will have that corridor to deal with and 7 your rental and your hotel spaces. 8 MS. GARCIA-TOLEDO: And that's 9 consistent with the urban design. It's 10 really not a problem. We have it 11 throughout. 12 My office is in the First Union 13 Financial Center, which is the prime office 14 building in this community, and a whole 15 entire east side of our building looks at 16 Chopin Plaza and the Intercontinental Hotel 17 right across. So that's the whole idea of U a 18 an urban environment. a c� 19 Certainlythe most expensive real P o �= .� 20 estate in Manhattan is that way. c o _ o 21 CHAIRMAN BLACK: Mr. Chisholm. v 22 MR. CHISHOLM: It will just take one .a i 23 minute. JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA GO- ��� 24 Mr. Chairman and members of the 25 board, you have an ordinance in place that JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA GO- ��� W., 1 requires that everyone be sensitive to each 2 other. It just so happens that we have a 3 situation where three major projects are 4 going up simultaneously, and it is an 5 unusual situation but we do have an 6 opportunity to work something out together 7 that will benefit all. 8 We're not asking to stop any project. 9 We're not asking to derail anyone. We 10 don't want to hurt anyone. We just want to 11 be compatible with everyone else. That's 12 all we're asking. We're asking you to 13 adhere to the ordinance. 14 Thank you very much. 15 CHAIRMAN BLACK: Thank you. 16 Vicky? 17 MS. GARCIA-TOLEDO: Again, v 18 misinformation. There are not three 19 projects that are going up simultaneously c"C , o U s .g L U .r v 20 at the same time. You have two Major Use o Cook 21 Special Permits which are part of your .a " 22 agenda today. You have a third party that:= 23 does not control all the land on which they 24 have designed this. By their own admission 25 they say they control approximately 95 JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA 66- 1188 1 percent. Our understanding from them is 2 that they own three lots on the north end 3 of that space, at that property, and that 4 they have under control, under contract or 5 option letters, several other spots in that 6 area. 7 So you're not here today -- you don't 8 have before you their project. 9 In fact, they have not applied for a 10 Major Use Special Permit; they have not 11 identified or designed a project. 12 So you only have two projects that 13 are on your agenda tonight. 14 Thank you. 15 CHAIRMAN BLACK: Thank you. 16 Miriam, I'd like to get a 17 clarification. 18 You are concluded, Vicky? 19 MS. GARCIA-TOLEDO: Yes, sir, unless 20 there's any questions. 21 CHAIRMAN BLACK: It would seem to me 22 that if we have to consider -- when we have 23 an application for a Major Use Special 24 Permit, if we were to consider all of the 25 areas around that and what could 93 U Cd E o LL cu �, £ m � o�o� c o . 'a o E JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA 0- JL88 19 I understand the issues and it's 20 really something that this board has been 21 very concerned about, and that is.a 22 collision of well-intentioned people who 23 want to do great things in this city that 24 are desperately needed but we haven't been is 25 able to come to grips with some of the W U L� C o U CL C �0 � _ .0 LL o c a c p o - o c0, E cn 2A JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA 60- 188 1 potentially happen, I think we could be 2 here for days and days. 3 It would seem to me that if it is 4 obviously onerous in the sense that there 5 was something going on that property that 6 would be so unusual that it would impact; 7 for example, putting up a television 8 antennae that would stretch four or 500 9 feet into the air with cables, that would 10 be a problem, but I'm not sure that this is 11 something that we can consider and do 12 justice. 13 If we were to consider the property 14 to the better west, well maybe we start 15 considering the property to the north 16 and the one diagonally across the street. 17 I'm afraid we're getting into some 18 quicksand. 19 I understand the issues and it's 20 really something that this board has been 21 very concerned about, and that is.a 22 collision of well-intentioned people who 23 want to do great things in this city that 24 are desperately needed but we haven't been is 25 able to come to grips with some of the W U L� C o U CL C �0 � _ .0 LL o c a c p o - o c0, E cn 2A JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA 60- 188 1 issues. 2 Some of us who have been here awhile 3 refer to Biscayne Boulevard where there was 4 a contest between Amerifirst and Faray's 5 (phonetic) family to get that damn building 6 built and as a result both of them lost 7 out, and we need to make sure that this 8 sort of thing doesn't happen -- 9 MR. POLAKOFF: Again. JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA 95 g-a C�5 :33 C U Q- c r, o , o o LL � oU c o (D c� E00 E , a: 10 CHAIRMAN BLACK: -- again. 11 I understand, I understand your 12 concern and your client's concern. 13 What I am concerned is about my board 14 and all of us trying to take in too much 15 our consideration. 16 I would hope that from my own point 17 of view there's a couple of things that 18 bother me about everything that's going on 19 here. We've got a million square feet of 20 project going into two, less than two city 21 blocks. We've got 1500 parking spaces. 22 Cocowalk was built. Great job. But 23 you can't get into that parking lot after 24 5:00, can you? 25 Okay. So what we're going to -- JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA 95 g-a C�5 :33 C U Q- c r, o , o o LL � oU c o (D c� E00 E , a: 1 We're going to have to take a break. 2 I'm sorry. This lady has been wonderful 3 and we just need a five-minute break. 4 (Thereupon the hearing was recessed 5 briefly and was thereafter resumed) 6 CHAIRMAN BLACK: Ladies and 7 Gentlemen, okay, I've pretty much 8 concluded. JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA U E co 2 9 MS. GARCIA-TOLEDO: Mr. Chairman, can 10 I answer your question? 11 Just as we quit you said what's going 12 to happen. You can't get into the parking 13 lot in Cocowalk at 5:00 o'clock. is14 This is not Cocowalk. We do not have 15 any entertainment. We have no movie 16 theaters here, number one. 17 Number two, our store makes it 18 specifically created. We don't have any 19 Banana Republics; we don't have any Gaps. 20 This, like I said, is on the 21 feasibility study specifically addressing 22 service establishments for the area of this 23 neighborhood of the Brickell Avenue, Roads, 24 North Grove, Coconut Grove area. 25 CHAIRMAN BLACK: Well, not to be JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA U E co 2 15 1 16 argumentative, Vicky, but it just seem to 17 2 18 defy logic. As far as I'm concerned, you 19 3 20 have a million square feet and 1500 parking 21 4 22 spaces, just like the arena did with 1200. 23 5 24 It bothers me. And I hope I'm wrong. 25 6 MR. McDOWELL: Again, Carter 7 McDowell. 8 We have 198,000 thousand square feet 9 of retail and an equal amount of hotel 10 that's 288 rooms. There's no million 11 square feet here. 12 And even Willy's project across the 13 street I think is about 400,000 square feet 14 total. 15 So together with the residential 16 and the hotel and retail we have maybe 17 800,000 square feet. 18 But again, they're a synergistic mix. 19 I mean, one of the reasons we like 20 this neighborhood is that those mixes work. 21 We feed off of their residential; they feed 22 off our retail. Our hotel works off the 23 office. It's just to our east. That's 24 what this neighborhood is intended to be. 25 CHAIRMAN BLACK: Well, I hope you're JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA 97 �tv � Co :3 i� E C o .c o ` oao�c o ( 0 '� E L MZ3 00 E 0 2 Mi 1 right and I think it would be a very good 2 thing. 3 I'm hoping that if it isn't that you 4 and I will go down there and we'll try to 5 find a parking space together. 6 MR. POLAKOFF: They'll valet it for 7 you. 8 MR. McELROY: Can I say something? 9 MS. GARCIA-TOLEDO: We have a 10 dropoff. 11 MR. McELROY: Mr. Chairman, can I say 12 something? 13 I have a question now. You know, 14 there's something we really didn't consider 15 here. Looking to where the entrance to 16 that parking garage is on this project, 17 this is right next to this other 18 gentleman's piece of property. c � 3:1 E m 19 And if he wants a dropoff point, o� LL U 20 where will he have his dropoff point when C o c O 21 everybody is backing up around this parking � c t 22 garage, around his property? 00 EL 23 MS. GARCIA-TOLEDO: On First Avenue. 05:tS i 24 MR. LENGYEL: I'm ready for a motion. 25 MR. McELROY: We talked about dropoff JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA 1 points. He puts a project over there, he 2 can't have a dropoff point anywhere but on 3 a main street. So, I mean, I think some 4 reconsideration -- I didn't realize that 5 was the end. 6 MR. LENGYEL: The end. 7 CHAIRMAN BLACK: Okay. Ms. Tabares. 8 MS. TABARES-FERNANDEZ: Amen. 9 CHAIRMAN BLACK: The Chair will 10 entertain a motion. 11 MR. LENGYEL: I got a motion. All 12 right. JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLOR�I`DA M 13 The motion is for approval with the o U ,o indicated w 14 conditions that staff has with 15 the exception of condition number three to Ex 16 eliminate the bridge. I would say we 17 should allow the bridge. And with the co E?? 18 elimination of number four. To allow for 19 the third dropoff area because I'm not in 20 favor, with all due respect, for 21 eliminating the dropoff area and putting 22 additional on -street parking. 23 MR. ARNAEZ: I second it. 24 CHAIRMAN BLACK: It's been moved by 25 Mr. Lengyel; seconded by Mr.-Arnaez. JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLOR�I`DA M 0 CL cC o U ,o u.* w (IMa? �oo;g U Ex 0 E co E?? , 100 JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA 10� JL88 1 MR. POLAKOFF: You're recommending 2 that you remove both? 3 MR. LENGYEL: Absolutely. 4 CHAIRMAN BLACK: Okay. Is there any 5 discussion on the motion? 6 MS. TABARES-FERNANDEZ: No. I wanted 7 to be the one to seconded but he -- 8 MR. POLAKOFF: We'll let you second. 9 MS. TABARES-FERNANDEZ: -- took 10 advantage. 11 THE CLERK: Mr. Lengyel? 12 MR. LENGYEL: Yes. 13 THE CLERK: Mr. Arnaez? 14 MR. ARNAEZ: Yes. 15 THE CLERK: Mr. McElroy? 16 MR. McELROY: It's a great, great 17 project. I wish -- I'm going to vote for 18 it because there's only one way to go, but azo a 19 I think you all need to be more sensitive. 3:1 E — CL a� 0 20 MS. GARCIA-TOLEDO: We'll continue to 00 L 21 talk. o c o O U 22 MR. McELROY: You need to sit down m c .0 23 and talk. And seriously, Vicky, you know 0 E M 24 how I negotiate. I mean, right to the end 25 I negotiate. You know, talk, work it out, JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA 10� JL88 JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA 101 u c cy CL �^ c � (D 0 O � C c � .C: o 70 j V 1 because it's so important that you work it 2 out. 3 MS. GARCIA-TOLEDO: You have our word 4 that we will continue to talk. 5 MR. McELROY: Neighbors are 6 important. Okay. 7 THE CLERK: Mr. Manner? 8 MR. MANNER: I would like to be 9 sensitive, too; however, the idea that 10 Mr. Echemendia is representing that his 11 project become the backdrop for this 12 instead does not sit well with me. 13 I vote yes. 14 THE CLERK: Ms. Tabares-Fernandez? 15 MS. TABARES-FERNANDEZ: Yes. 16 THE CLERK: Ms. Scheer? 17 MS. SCHEER: Yes. 18 THE CLERK: Mr. Polakoff. 19 MR. POLAKOFF: I vote yes with 20 enthusiasm. 21 THE CLERK: And Mr. Black? 22 CHAIRMAN BLACK: I vote yes. 23 And I would also echo what 24 Mr. McElroy said. We need to avoid that in 25 the city. We really do. So I would hope JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA 101 u c cy CL �^ c � (D 0 O � C c � .C: o 70 j V 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 0 25 JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA , • • 1 II CERTIFICATE OF NOTARY 2 IISTATE OF FLORIDA ) ss. 3 11COUNTY OF DADE ) 4 I, AMAR KREDI, Registered Professional Reporter, Certified Shorthand Reporter and Notary 5 Public in and for the State of Florida at Large, do hereby certify that I reported the foregoing meeting 6 of the City of Miami Planning Advisory Board at the time and place aforesaid, and that the foregoing 7 pages, numbered from 1 to 102, inclusive, constitute a true record of an excerpt from said meeting as 8 stenographically recorded by me; and that this computer-assisted transcript was prepared under my 9 supervision. 10 I further certify that I am not an attorney or counsel of any of the parties herein, 11 nor a relative or employee of any attorney or counsel connected with the action, nor financially 12 interested in the action. 13 I further state that I do not certify as to the authenticity of any copies not personally 14 signed and sealed by me. 15WITNESS my hand and official seal in the City of Miami, County of Dade, State of Florida, 16 this 15th day of February, 2000. 19 AMAR KREDI Registered Professional Reporter 20 Certified Shorthand Reporter and Notary Public in and for the 21 State of Florida At Large 22 My Notary Commission Expires: 23 May 16, 2000 24 25 103 OFFICIAL NOTARY SEAL _Q' Y P416 AMAR KREDI 2 l� 0 COMMISSION NUMBER N Q CC553851 ��P `c OF F�C MY COMMISSION EXPIRES MAY 16,2000 JOHN J. BLUE & ASSOCIATES - MIAMI, FLORIDA MIAMI VONUMEN c c a+h qTPFPT FND PK/WASHER # 6710FpjrL N 676,821.]9 G.V. FPL -FPL F 732,491.19 t< SE L NE 4� MIAMI BA �4,40 651.3' (MEAS) MIAMI BA 5.01 . b., 1 65113 4.66 MIAMIBAsE LINE-�—.----- 3T 4,29 MCI 7-A MCI 2 -CONCRETE GUTTER B.S.T. S.T. W.P.P. SAN TA ty P �.M'-' el M P.M.MANHOLE: H.H. INLET' 4.-jo.,91 H.H. P h M '10 -E 2' CONCRETE GUTTER, I '..; 1� !!!::: v P.M. Z I 1 .61 0 B.S.T. M.S.P. PLANTER MANHOLE v P.M.• 4.29 4. I W.M. •--co , -- P.M WCONCREJE WALK INLI E r R/W LINE 3' CONCRETE WALK ow.m., -IPIPIBIIII" - , - - `*� INLET I 9 FND PK/WASE P.M W Mt 596.43' (M) 45 V 6 INE MANHOLE 6710 _13Y C4 G.L.P. � * 3 1.2' IIIIIIII O ����` �' �t�Gf j - -,7aCO.97: t . IIINro'uwo�vQ%'1a O '• -_ Lc - �. - 9.f' 17.4' r A ' B.S.1 Lu c L9'C-� �-- r...-- 3 -_ J ^ 01 IAJ MANH(�E �o �P ��`' WW�I • 0 ONE STORY w WOOD FRAME 1.00 z .10 _j 0 TWO STORY 37.2.' C.O.S. TWO STORY V C.B.S. P.M. 4 I C. p H.H. 151.29 P.M. 10 b ONE STORY 4 0 WOOD FRAME Ir - 6 5 9 8 7 c LL P.M Aj La 0 1�y (D TWO STORY E TWO STORY io WP. . WOOD FRAN,(�_ 0 b 66.51 HIGH CORRUGATED P.4 t- AALUMINUM FENCE 151,26' W.M. u") 8.2' ADS -COUNTY 141�� ��, b 30.01 22.13 ONE STORY >i 12 CPB.',Bl P. 41) ONE STORY i�- WOOD FRAME TWO STORY F cas, VHIGH C14 C41 C. B.S. WALL CIA till syrrrll� till 45-00 VC111. LINK till 50.00 till uj '0 50.00 A t4f 4' HIGH L FP)ON Ec cl) C4 �J7 /y BLOCP S 71 rON E ' w WO() WOO' FRA awe P.M. o cr- . I y -u ul . i I sn I c I (n TWO STORY y 18.4 1 16 64 Vu- 'I a WOOD FRAME LLI W.m A Y� w 001F Q1 S 14 T 3 E 01; IN, yy. 4 16 151-191 Lo 17 18 19.. TWO STORY WOOD FRAME 0 Ln 20 21 '15 0 - FND. 60d 0N NAIL W/13188 -A IN TREE TRUNK SANITARY LINE C) .01 R ooe MANHOLE I --- 5.21 151.16' ��R/w'LINE K -t- 62 15', 25 a__mm_ 4.18 W.p.p. 3-99 VCONCRET WALK W.P.P. W.P.P.0 W.P.P. W.P.P 4.62 4 -OA 6 W.M. 7—N --v 2rMNCKETE-GUTTvr MANHOLE TCONCRIETE"GUTTr 9 651.1 (MEAS) BASE LINE--- PK -NA STOR ORAN SANITARY & DISK MANHOLE MANHOLE . ................. . *E*10th TRSE %) Fw- Ld LL O CA 6,5 P.M s95 jq jo TWO STORY p I .S. 'SC ELE11 MIA (L ani G. V. m 0 UO 11T4 I I Isim TWO STORY C.1315. B.S.T. PAD .1 I t I Llj- �S ELECT LEC W.P.P. 9 1 tn4rm,j--*,—MIAM[pASE LINE \?o MANHOLE Vp ,a P.M 2 25 z P.q. SET I/R C w z LB* 3527\ FND I/R ro W/CAP R: ' 0 0' CAP CHOPPED 90 058, 711 . STORM MANt DRAIN OLE 'SC ELE11 MIA (L ani G. V. m 0 UO 11T4 I I Isim TWO STORY C.1315. B.S.T. PAD .1 I t I Llj- �S ELECT LEC W.P.P. 9 1 tn4rm,j--*,—MIAM[pASE LINE \?o MANHOLE Vp