Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutR-01-1272J--01--976 12/11/01. RESOLUTION NO. ► "' .., r. G rws A RESOLUTION OF THE MIAMI CITY COMMISSION, WITH ATTACHMENTS, APPROVING WITH CONDITIONS, A MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT PURSUANT TO ARTICLES 13 AND 17 OF ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 11000, FOR THE 1800 CLUB PROJECT, TO BE LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY 1800 NORTH BAYSHORE DRIVE, MIAMI, FLORIDA, TO BE COMPRISED OF A RESIDENTIAL TOWER WITH NOT MORE THAN 450 RESIDENTIAL UNITS, ACCESSORY RECREATIONAL SPACE, 36,818 SQUARE FEET OF RETAIL AND OFFICE USES AND 670 PARKING SPACES; DIRECTING TRANSMITTAL OF THE HEREIN RESOLUTION; MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATING CONCLUSIONS OF LAW; PROVIDING FOR BINDING EFFECT; CONTAINING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, on September 7, 2001, BCOM, Inc.,(hereinafter referred to as "APPLICANT"), submitted a complete Application for Major Use Special Permit for the 1800 Club Project (hereinafter referred to as "PROJECT") pursuant to Articles 13 and 17 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, for the property Located at approximately 1800 North Bayshore Drive, Miami, Florida, as legally described in "Exhibit B" and "Exhibit A," attached and incorporated; and CITY COME 9810N 1WEETING 10,119 Ilesolutton ATo. WHEREAS, development of the PROJECT requires the issuance of a Major Use Special Permit pursuant to Article 17 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended; and WHEREAS, the Large Scale Development Committee met on July 11, 2001, to consider the proposed PROJECT and offer its input; and WHEREAS, the APPLICANT has modified the proposed PROJECT to address the expressed technical concerns raised at said Large Scale Development Committee meeting; and WHEREAS, the Urban Development Review Board met on July 18, 2001, to consider the proposed PROJECT and recommended approval, with conditions as specified in the attached Development Order; and WHEREAS, the Miami Planning Advisory Board, at its meeting held on October 24, 2001, Item No. 1, following an advertised public hearing, adopted Resolution No. PAB-91-01 by a vote of six to zero (6-0), RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of the Major Use Special Permit Development Order as attached and incorporated; and WHEREAS, the City Commission deems it advisable and in the best interest of the general welfare of the City of Miami to issue a Major Use Special Permit Development Order as hereinafter set forth; Page 2 of 8 �: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. The recitals and findings contained in the Preamble to this Resolution are adopted by reference and incorporated as if fully set forth in this Section. Section 2. A Major Use Special Permit Development: Order, attached and incorporated as "Exhibit A," is approved subject to the conditions specified in the Development Order, per Article 17 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, for the PROJECT to be developed by the APPLICANT, at approximately 1800 North Bayshore Drive, Miami, Florida, more particularly described on "Exhibit B," attached and incorporated. Section 3. The PROJECT is approved as a mixed use development for the construction of a single towers which includes a total of 450 residential units, with accessory recreational space, 36,818 square feet of retail and office uses and 670 parking spaces. Section 4. The Major Use Special Permit Application for the PROJECT also encompasses the lower ranking Special Permits as set forth in the Development Order ("Exhibit A"). Section 5. The findings of fact set forth below are made with respect to the subject PROJECT: a. The PROJECT is in conformity with the adopted Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000, as amended. Page 3 of 8 10 E C b. The PROJECT is in accord with the SD -6 Zoning classifications of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended. c. Pursuant to Section 1305 of the Zoning Ordinance of: the City of Miami, Florida, the specific site plan aspects of the PROJECT, i.e., ingress and egress, parking, signs and lighting, utilities, drainage, preservation of natural features and control of potentially adverse effects generally, have been considered and will be further considered administratively during the process of issuing a building permit and a certificate of occupancy. d. The PROJECT is expected to cost approximately $122 million, and to employ approximately 225 workers during construction (FTE -Full Time Employees); the PROJECT will also result in the creation of approximately 25 permanent new jobs. The PROJECT will generate approximately $2.2 million annually in tax revenues to local units of government (2001 dollars). e. The City Commission further finds that: (1) the PROJECT will have a favorable impact on the economy of the City; Page 4 of 8 (2) the PROJECT will efficiently use public transportation facilities; (3) any potentially adverse effects of the PROJECT will be mitigated through compliance with the conditions of this Major Use Special Permit; (4) the PROJECT will favorably affect the need for people to find adequate housing reasonably accessible to their places of employment; (5) the PROJECT will efficiently use necessary public facilities; (6) the PROJECT will not negatively impact the environment and natural resources of the City; (7) the PROJECT will not adversely affect living conditions in the neighborhood; (8) the PROJECT will not adversely affect public safety; (9) based on the record presented and evidence presented, the public welfare will be served by the PROJECT; and (1.0) any potentially adverse effects of the PROJECT arising from safety and security, fire protection and life safety, solid waste, heritage conservation, trees, minority participation Page 5 of 8 shoreline development, and employment, and E 0 minority contractor/subcontractor participation will be mitigated through compliance with the conditions of this Major Use Special Permit. Section 6. The Major Use Special Permit, as approved and amended, shall be binding upon the APPLICANT and any successors in interest. Section 7. The application for Major Use Special Permit, which was submitted on September 7, 2001, and on file with the Department of Planning and Zoning of the City of Miami, Florida, shall be relied upon generally for administrative interpretations and is incorporated by reference. Section 8. The City Manager is directed to instruct the Director of the Department of Planning and Zoning to transmit a copy of this Resolution and attachment to the developers: Vicky Garcia -Toledo, Esq., on behalf of BOOM, Inc., 2500 First Union Financial Center, 200 South Biscayne Boulevard, Miami, Fl. 33131. Section 9. The Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law are made with respect to the PROJECT as described in the Development Order ("Exhibit A") for the PROJECT, attached and incorporated. Section 10. The Major Use Special Permit Development Order for the PROJECT ("Exhibit A") is granted and issued. Page 6 of 8 i ` E7 0 Section 11. In the event that any portion or section of this Resolution or the Development Order ("Exhibit A") is determined to be invalid, illegal, or unconstitutional by a court or agency of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall in no manner affect the remaining portions of this Resolution or. Development Order ("Exhibit A") which shall remain in full force and effect. Section 12. The provisions approved for this Major Use Special Permit, as approved, shall commence and become operative thirty (30) days after the adoption of the herein Resolution. Section 13. This Major Use Special Permit, as approved, shall expire two (2) years from its commencement and operative date. Section 14. This Resolution shall become effective thirty (30) days from the date of its issuance and its adoption and signature of the Mayor.'/ i/ if the Mayor does not sign this Resolution, it shall become effective at the end of ten calendar days from the date it was passed and adopted. if the Mayor vetoes this Resolution, it shall become effective immediately upon override of the veto by the City Commission. Page 7 of 8 'l y • Ei h r 1� {,r ,a , r. 0 PASSED AND ADOPTED this 11th day of ATTEST: WALTER J. FOEMAN CITY CLERK 11 December , 2001. MANUEL A. DIAZ, MAYOR DI. lop" P Vol. Page 8 of 8 "EXHIBIT A" ATTACHMENT TO RESOLUTION NO. DATE: 1800 CLUB PROJECT MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT DEVELOPMENT ORDER Let it be known that pursuant to Articles 13 and 17 of Ordinance No. 11000, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended (the "Zoning Ordinance"), the Commission of the City of Miami, Florida, has considered in a public hearing, the issuance of a Major Use Special Permit for the 1800 Club Project (hereinafter referred to as the "PROJECT") to be located at approximately 1800 North Bayshore Drive, Miami, Florida (see legal description on "Exhibit B," attached and incorporated), is subject to any dedications, limitations, restrictions, reservations or easements of record. After due consideration of the recommendations of the Planning Advisory Board and after due consideration of the consistency of this proposed development with the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan, the City Commission has approved the PROJECT, and subject to the following conditions approves the Major Use Special Permit and issues this Permit: r U FINDINGS OF FACT E PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The proposed PROJECT is a residential/mixed use development to be located at approximately 1800 North Bayshore Drive, Miami, Florida. The PROJECT is located on a gross lot area of approximately 117,892 square feet and a net lot area of approximately 1..441 acres (62,769 square feet) of land (more specifically described on "Exhibit B," incorporated herein by reference). The remainder of the PROJECT's Data Sheet is attached and incorporated as "Exhibit C." The proposed PROJECT will consist of a mixed use tower, with no more than 450 residential units with accessory recreational space, and 36,81.8 square feet of retail and office uses. The PROJECT will also provide a total. of 670 parking spaces. The ownership, operation and maintenance of common areas and facilities will be by the property owner or (in the case of the property being converted to condominiums) a mandatory property owner association in perpetuity pursuant to a recorded Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions. The Major Use Special Permit Application for the PROJECT also encompasses the following lower ranking Special Permits: Page 2 of 9 CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 906.6, for active recreational facilities (including swimming pools); CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT to permit staging and parking during construction (to be approved prior to obtaining a building permit from the Department of Planning and Zoning); CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 925.3.8, to allow development/construction/ rental signage; CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 917.2.1, to allow valet parking for residential use; CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 920.1, to allow a construction trailer; CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Section 915.2 for FAA clearance letter; CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 6, Section 606.3.1, for development of new construction within the Special District; CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 6, Section 606.3.1, for a temporary construction fence and covered walkway; CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9 to allow a reduction in the size of loading berths. MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 17 for development of 450 residential units; Page 3 of 9 MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 17 for parking structure of 670 parking spaces; PER CITY CODE, Chapter 36, Construction Equipment, request for waiver from the City Commission of noise ordinance during construction; Pursuant to Articles 13 and 17 of the Zoning Ordinance, approval of the requested Major Use Special Permit shall be considered sufficient for the subordinate permits requested and referenced above as well as any other special approvals required by the City which may be required to carry out the requested plans. The PROJECT shall be constructed substantially in accordance with plans and design schematics on file prepared by Bermello & Ajamil, dated September 2001; the landscape plan shall be implemented substantially in accordance with plans and design schematics on file prepared by Bermello & Ajamil, dated September 2001; said design and landscape plans may be permitted to be modified only to the extent necessary to comply with the conditions for approval imposed herein; all modifications shall be subject to the review and approval of the Director of the Department of Planning and Zoning prior to the issuance of any building permits. Page 4 of 9 .. r• �' L"r "u The PROJECT conforms to the requirements of the SD -6 Zoning District, as contained in the Zoning Ordinance, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended. The existing comprehensive plan future land use designation on the subject property allows the proposed mix of residential and commercial uses. CONDITIONS THE APPLICANT, ITS SUCCESSORS, AND/OR ASSIGNS, JOINTLY OR SEVERALLY, PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF ANY BUILDING PERMITS, SHALL COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING: 1. Meet all applicable building codes, land development regulations, ordinances and other laws. 2. Pay all applicable fees due prior to the issuance of a building permit. 3. Allow the Miami Police Department to conduct a security survey, at the option of the Department, and to make recommendations concerning security measures and systems; further, submit a report to the Department of Planning and Zoning, prior to commencement of construction, demonstrating how the Police Department recommendations, if any, have been incorporated into the PROJECT security and Construction plans, or demonstrate to the Director of the Department of Planning and Zoning why such recommendations are impractical. Page 5 of 9 k.v .. 4. Obtain approval from, or provide a letter from the Department of Fire -Rescue indicating APPLICANT'S coordination with members of the Fire Plan Review Section at the Department of Fire -Rescue in the review of the scope of the PROJECT, owner responsibility, building development process and review procedures, as well as specific requirements for fire protection and life safety systems, exiting, vehicular access and water supply. 5. Obtain approval from, or provide a letter of assurance from the Department of Solid Waste that the PROJECT has addressed all concerns of the said Department prior to the obtainment of a shell permit. 6. Prepare a Minority Participation and Employment Plan (including a Contractor/Subcontractor Participation Plan) to be submitted to the City's Director of Equal Employment Opportunity for review and comments, with the understanding that the APPLICANT must use its best efforts to follow the provisions of the City's Minority/Women Business Affairs and Procurement Program as a guide. 7. Prior to the issuance of a shell permit, record the following in the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida, prior to the issuance of a shell permit: (a) a Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions providing that the ownership, operation and maintenance of all common areas and facilities will be by the property owner or a mandatory property owner association in perpetuity; (b) a certified copy of the Development Order specifying that the Development Order runs with the land and is binding on the Page 6 of 9 APPLICANT, its ,successors, and assigns, jointly or severally. 8. Prior to the issuance of a shell permit, demonstrate to the City that the PROJECT has either: (a) completed its condominium application requirements and has filed for such with the State of Florida; or (b) provide the City with an executed, recordable unity of title or covenant in --lieu of unity of title agreement for the subject property; said agreement shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Attorney's Office. 9. The Department of Public Works shall be provided with plans for proposed sidewalk and Swale area improvements for its review and approval prior to the issuance of a building permit. 10. Provide the Department of Planning and Zoning with a temporary parking plan, including an operational plan, which addresses construction employee parking during the construction period, said plan shall be subject to the review and approval by the Department of Planning and Zoning prior to the issuance of any building permits and shall be enforced during construction activity. 11. The applicant shall continue to work with the Planning and Zoning Department on the final design for the 18th Street fagade at the ground level in order to diminish the appearance of a blank wall along the street edge. Page 7 of 9 4 A THE CITY SHALL: Establish the operative date of this Permit as being thirty (30) days from the date of its issuance; the issuance date shall constitute the commencement of the thirty (30) day period to appeal from the provisions of the Permit. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW The PROJECT, proposed by the APPLICANT, complies with the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1.989--2000, is consistent with the orderly development and goals of the City of Miami, and complies with local land development regulations and further, pursuant to Section 1703 of the Zoning Ordinance: (1) the PROJECT will have a favorable impact on the economy of the City; and (2) the PROJECT will efficiently use public transportation facilities; and (3) the PROJECT will favorably affect the need for people to find adequate housing reasonably accessible to their places of employment; and (4) the PROJECT will efficiently use necessary public facilities; and Page 8 of 9 El (5) the PROJECT will not negatively impact the environment; and natural resources of the City; and (6) the PROJECT will not adversely affect public safety; and (7) the public welfare will be served by the PROJECT; and (8) any potentially adverse effects of the PROJECT will be mitigated through conditions of this Major Use Special Permit. The proposed development does not unreasonably interfere with the achievement of the objectives of the adopted State Land Development Plan applicable to the City of Miami. Pursuant to Section 1305 of the Zoning Ordinance, the specific site plan aspects of the PROJECT i.e., ingress and egress, offstreet parking and loading, refuse and service areas, signs and lighting, utilities, drainage and control of potentially adverse effects generally have been considered and will be further considered administratively during the process of issuing individual building permits and certificates of occupancy. Page 9 of 9 2' ',- a d c .. r Legal Description: EXHIBIT "II" Lots 8, 9 & 12 Block 7 of "MIRAMAR" according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 5 at the Page 4, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida. M u J, B it Mt Required Provided Difference Net Lot Area 62,769.1 sf (1.441 Acres) Gross Lot Area 117,892 sf Density 500 Units / Acre Max. 312 Units 1 Acre -188 Units / Acre Gross Building Area 728,558 sf (w/o garage or pool deck) Building Footprint 45,677 sf Gross Parking Area 275,561 sf (including loading berths) P.A.R. Residential 599,046 sf Office 27,604 sf Restaurant / Cafe 4,872 sf Lobby / Valet 4,342 sf Total 848,822.4 sf max 635,864 sf -212,958,4 sf Parking Spaces Residential 1 space / 1 unit Min. 450 spaces min. Office 35 spaces min. 1 space / 800 sf Restaurant no minimum 0 Total 485 spaoes 670 spaces +185 spaces Offstreet Loading 4 berths 12' x 35' 5 berths 12' x 35' Size Reduction only 1 berths 12'x 55' (Class 11 Permit) Building Height Roof Slab Unlimited 398'-4" Top of Parapet 423'-4" Elevator Overide 438'-8" Buildiniz Setbacks N. Bayshore Drive 5 feet 18'-2" +13'-2" NE 18'h Street 5 feet varies 5'-0" to 28'-6" 0'-0" to 23'-6" Alley 5 feet varies 5'-10" to 21'-6" +10" to + 16'-'6" Adjacent Property 0 feet 0" 0" Units 1 -Bedroom 190 2 -Bedroom 225 3 -Bedroom 35 Total 720 max 450 -270 Open Space 1 sf Open Space / 57,751 sf min. 57,751 sf 0 sf 10 sf Residential FAR PLANNING FACT SHEET Pz 1 APPLICANT Vicky Garcia -Toledo, Esq. for BCOM Inc. HEARING DATE October 24, 2001 REQUESTILOCATION Approximately 1800 North Bayshore Drive LEGAL DESCRIPTION Complete legal description on file with the Hearing Boards Office. PETITION Consideration of approving a Major Use Special Permit for the 1800 Club Project located at approximately 1800 North Bayshore Drive in order to allow a mixed-use development project consisting of 450 residential units, with accessory recreational uses, 36,818 sq. ft. of retail/nonresidential space, and 670 Larking spaces. PLANNING RECOMMENDATION Approval with conditions. BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS See attached for background and analysis. PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD Recommended Approval VOTE: 6--0 with Conditions CITY COMMISSION N/A APPLICATION NUMBER 01-064 Item #1 CITY OF MIAMI e PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT 444tSW 2ND AVENUE, 3R° FLOOR • MIAMI, FLORIDA, 33130 PHONE (305) 416-1400 Date: 10/17/2001 Page 1 -1TY Analysis for Major Use Special Permit for the 1 800 CLUB PROJECT located at APPROXE14ATELY 1800 North Bayshore Drive CASE NO. 2001-054 Pursuant to Ordinance 11000, as amended, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, the subject proposal for the 1800 Club Project has been reviewed to allow a Major Use Special Permit. This Permit also includes the following requests: CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 906.6, for active recrea- tional facilities (including swimming pools); CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT to permit staging and parking during construction (to be approved prior to obtaining a building permit from the Department of Plan- ning and Zoning); CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 925.3.5, to allow develop- ment/construction/ rental signage; CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 917.2.1, to allow valet parking for residential use; CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 920.1, to allow a construc- tion trailer; CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Section 915.2 for FAA clearance letter; CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 6, Section 606.3.1, for development of new construction within the Special District; CLASS H SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 6, Section 606.3.1, for a temporary construction fence and covered walkway; CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9 to allow a reduction in the size of loading berths. MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 17 for development of 450 resi- dential units; 0 MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 17 for parking structure of 670 parking spaces; PER CITY CODE, Chapter 36, Construction Equipment, request for waiver from the City Commission of noise ordinance during construction; Pursuant to Articles 13 and 17 of Zoning Ordinance 11000, approval of the requested Major Use Special Permit shall be considered sufficient for the subordinate permits requested and referenced above as well as any other special approvals required by the City which may be required to carry out the requested plans. The requested Special Permit is for the purpose of allowing a mixed-use development project consisting of a mixed-use tower, with no more than 450 residential units with ac- cessory recreational space, and 36,818 square feet of retail and office uses. The PROJECT will also provide a total of 670 parking spaces. In determining the appropriateness of the proposed residential project, the Planning and Zoning Department has referred this project to the Large Scale Development Committee (LSDC) and the Urban Development Review Board (UDRB) for additional input and recommendations; the following findings have been made: • It is found that the proposed mixed-use/residential development project will benefit the Downtown and Biscayne Boulevard Districts by creating new housing opportunities in the North Omni area to serve both Downtown and the Boulevard. • It is found that the subject property has convenient access to Margaret Pace Park and public transit that makes it ideally suited for residential and retail as a mixed use to serve the area. • It is found that the project was reviewed by the Large Scale Development Committee on July 11, 2001 and has been modified to address the expressed technical concerns raised at said Large Scale Development Committee meeting; however, additional design details related to sidewalk and swale area improvements will have to be submitted at the time of permitting. • It is found that the project was reviewed by the Urban Development Review Board on July 18, 2001 and has been recommended for approval. • It is found that the proposed project was reviewed for design appropriateness by the Planning and Zoning Department; the staff review resulted in design modifications which were then recommended for approval to the Planning and Zoning Director, subject to conditions as specified below and in the Development Order regarding 18`" Street. El 0 p It is found that with respect to all additional criteria as specified in Section 1305 of Zoning Ordinance 11000, the proposal has been reviewed and found to be adequate. Based on •these findings, the Planning and Zoning Department is recommending approval of the requested Development Project with the following conditions: 1. The approval of this Major Use Special Permit shall be subject to the recordation of the following documents prior to the issuance of any building permits for the proposed project: a. Unity of Title or covenant in lieu thereof providing that the ownership, operation and maintenance of all common areas and facilities will be by the property owner or a mandatory property owner association in perpetuity or completion of the State of Florida condominium process which assures the same compliance. b. Development Order specifying that the Development Order runs with the land and is binding on the Applicant, it successors and assigns, jointly or severally. 2. pursuant to the Department of Public Works, plans for proposed sidewalk and Swale area improvements must be approved prior to the issuance of a building permit and a covenant will be required for any non -standards improvements located in public right -o# -way. 3. Submittal of a parking plan for construction employees while the new building is under construction; said parking plan shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning Department prior to the issuance of any building permits and must comply with the Development Order criteria. 4. The applicant shall continue to work with the Planning and Zoning Department on the final design for the 18th Street fagade at the ground level in order to diminish the appearance of a blank wall along the street edge. 5. This approval shall also be subject to all additional conditions as specified in the attached Development Order. RESOLUTION PAB - 91-01 A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS, AS SPECIFIED BY STAFF, OF A MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT FOR THE 1800 CLUB PROJECT LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY 1800 NORTH BAYSHORE DRIVE IN ORDER TO ALLOW A MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT PROJECT CONSISTING OF 450 RESIDENTIAL UNITS, WITH ACCESSORY RECREATIONAL USES, 36,818 SQUARE FEET OF RETAIL/NONRESIDENTIAL SPACE AND 670 PARKING SPACES. HEARING DATE: October 24, 2001 ITEM NO. 1 VOTE: 6-0 ATTEST ,,,/ 4aelalbeft-Sanc lr z,ire %pand Zoning Departhent Ii I II IS�I i i �•��� 4 I L,. I lI � I I1 I N 2 rl 2 N y II x,- I 4 r I 5 4 ie 1••�7+,II a �• S ' N.fjl1 1 L a 23 7 ( 23 4 n 'gT „ 41 •o 1/ 9 TERRANOVA r a a= a ] `A'NCY x14RACt s.4 tl a 1♦I•<•It II��s!v�,.�rla +I� I BISi,AY{�:E - t♦. T;• � L I ',a 3. ' f � � t , ! 1,;7 E1S Et1qN T�'A'�_LuI4o',l{ x R A i Z t .E 22•.•��a0+ MV.1511(1RE 1 WICC • i� � >I �4 !.�1g..5. .♦ r 3 , r 111.6, •• IW; x. I'. ra t { r 1,L ] . ' ~ ; f •3 ♦ I , : �(" r4P{Sl I ' i ` Yaz N 1! Ix �M 10 1 1 � no' IJ !C ' q 7a A ♦! V 21 p _ ST � N.E 21 T14 apt 1.7 2 I 1? w 3 r/ TR '•A' ui Z O {f I _ i o z a 5 +�z • .1 e r 'J • l'' a - +, {� ' 1 M 44141 ♦ I 4H NE C 2C TR 1+ r♦ IS rt II 10 � r c h r 3 2 1 1 II 10 .� '+ IaT r � S, - S,-6 1 .. - . 1+ � u ' • ♦ ! lea ' t I I U T L ?�;�7 \— SNR, yr4• IF + . ! , •aZ T �_`ai�,68Jaa.�.J l�� r I 11 IS ,`l.LnCk lif 401+I.y crl . a 7 f 11!2 e to _0. _ y ST 3 rR�a TEMPLE y. ISRAEL C, G t 4"' G/1 PARK V4u,u 'IhiT h ^ • f qb IF-77 4 •4 -V iII +14 .4Qp � IJ II19 � � .;, •...'.�5.,�;� 0 I' I h.F, Iiiia?I� SF zl CITY CEMETERY a + a I S p 1 l I • t P R !1 t a ] r S _ Q 1 P 4< R k qa a S I R A 1111 AIMIEx D I y TERR. + �• .r.. I TFfl ACT •A" � � •.,El.6to -'� s 5a6 OMNI ANNEX N• + x+17 T RFt r` r *0144 Q��aT�O 1: t N.E. 17 _ 57 - i0° • .hE rrls-� 1.l a,ra P)i� Q -9 { u C711�. ru s�. TRACT 'A' C w6lB, �^' 4 1' I T ICT uA' - drift• 14611M .' WE 1 TRACT PLAZA$R ! Vf'EMETIP :I 4 7l E 1545 4 k T •C , I , I o �! t _ ._. 1 .+ L� • 1 I O t E r ! l _ �• 3 Q+" 1• l•Ir� TRAGT'd'0 I 1 + eeo 0 } S T. 15 0 000 00000000000 w N.E. '] ♦. EKY A. S. C . r �CI ' TAAC 1 �`'`�• r. 4 - ! 17 CENTER ��.+ +E.1.. r..., ^ HERALD PARK � E Ii •d �, ! TFI 'A' e° 1 1 . HE TN -ROP VN:'4E •Su�1'44 _•4♦ S T� °OI�O°O OdPO 0000 � o e 00 a Q �' 4 � Q no w 7 ' a N.E 14 ST z a r S - � u �� L � oea00000aooaooe000�0 .2 ' o � _ �•• •� i �/' a 1 + �,_eU. 4 T—1 1 r a p I z i f Y.Jrx --,.i • [ ? ki �['�r. [ r1' - -_ - Joh � 6'i r . � ♦ ! � _ - i lit ` v I i -�_- _ f - e,a, f - •�_ '- - _ 1 % r - 214 S - I 1` I f - .� yy € 00 00 �K is Tff �Ir_f- - 1w. A jj I r f N-0 ,,/ii • - ry. - X14' _ ..fi �- _ _ _� �• ' - i ,. -yam _ __ r f .!?rr.•F-f7" I II I -�. _ � 1 - r _i' r•r .�r7 1'�[-i r C.+• rte. _ - - _ M1 r � _� - � � : �• .Its _ t- .•,' .•+. ,, ;»:r• _'t"". I ,�}r t.:.k:i -�1, � -- IS m 6954 N.W 12 STREET, MIAMI, FLORIDA 33126 305-477-9149 • 800-287-4799 • FAX 305-477-7526 condition FC 017 CITY OF MIAMI PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPLICATION FOR MAJOR. USE SPECIAL PERMIT IT IS IN'T'ENDED THAT MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMITS BE REQUIRED WHERE SPECIFIED USES AND/OR OCCUPANCIES INVOLVE MATTERS DEEMED TO BE OF CITYWIDE OR AREA -WIDE IMPORTANCE. THE CITY COMMISSION SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR DE'T'ERMINATIONS ON APPLICATIONS FOR MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMITS., (SEE ARTICLE] 7 OF ORDINANCE 11000, ASAMENDED. THE'ZONING ORDINANCE OFTHE CITY OFMIAMI, FLORIDA.) THE CITY COMMISSION SHALL REFER ALL APPLICATIONS FOR MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMITS TO THE PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD AND TO. THE DIRECTOR OF THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT FOR RECOMMENDATIONS, AND MAY MAKEREFERRALSTO AGENCIES, BODIES, OROFFICERS, EIHERTHROUGHTHEPLANNINGDEPARTMENTORDIRECILY, FOR REVIEW, ANALYSIS AND/OR TECHNICAL FINDINGS AND DETERMINATIONS AND REPORTS THEREON, (SEESE(_rJON 1301.5 OF ORDINANCE 11000, AS AMENDED, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA.) SECTION 2.633 OFnM CODE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, AS AMENDED, GENERALLY REQUIRES ANYPERSON WHO RECErVES COMPENSATION, REM[)NERATION OR EXPENSES FOR CONDUCTING LOBBYING ACTrMIES TO REGISTER AS A LOBBYIST WITH THE CITY CLERK, PRIOR TO ENGAGING IN LOBBYING ACTIVITIES BEFORE CITY STAFF, BOARDS, COMMITTEES AND THE CITY COMMISSION. A COPY OF SAID ORDINANCE IS AVAILABLE IN TIM OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK (MIAMI CITY HALL), LOCATED AT 3500 PAN AMERICAN DRIVE, MIAMI, FLORIDA 33133. NOTE: THIS APPLICATION MUST BE TYPEWRITTEN AND SIGNED INBLACK INK I, Vicky Garcia -Toledo as attorney for BCOM, Inc., as contract purchaser hereby apply to the Director of the Planning Department of the City of Miami for approval of a Major Use Special Permit under the provisions of Article 17 of the City of Miami Zoning Ordinance. Property Address: 1800 North Ba shore Drive Nature of proposed use (be specific): A mixed use project with main level commercial office spacg_ residential a artments with.32arking gArage and recreational amenities. - �- APPLICATION MATERIALS I attach the following in support and explanation of the application: 1. Two original surveys, prepared by a State of Florida Registered Land Surveyor within one year from the date of application. 2. Affidavit disclosing ownership of property covered by application and disclosure of interest form (attach forms 4-83 and 4a-83 to application). 3. Cert f ified list of owners of real estate within a 500 -foot radius from the outside boundaries o property (attach form 6-83 to application). 4. Maps of the: (a) Existing zoning designation. (b) Adopted comprehensive plan designation for areas on and around the property. 5. General location map showing relation to the site or activity to major streets, schools, existin; utilities, shopping areas, important physical features in and adjoining the project, and the like. 6. Concept Plan (a) Site plan and relevant information per Section 1304.2.1d -h. (b) Relationships to surrounding existing and proposed futures uses and activities, systems and facilities, per Section 1702.3.2a. (c) How concept affects existing zoning and adopted comprehensive pian principles and designations; tabulation of any required variances, special permits, changes of zoning or exemptions, per Section 1702-3.2b. 7. Developmental Impact Study (an application for development approval for a Development of Regional Impact may substitute). S. Other (be specific):See Addendum to Application for Major Use 5 ecial Exce tion _ 9. Fee of $ _, for the Major Use Special Permit, based on current fee schedule as set forth in Chapter 62 of the Code of the City of Miami, as amended. 10. Additional fee of $ for any required special permits, changes of zoning or variances set forth in chapter 62 of the Code of the City of Miami, Total Fee: $ Signature Name Address Phone/Fax Date 305-350-2409 1 305305-374-7593 .30Zoo FINAL APPROVAL OF THUS APPLICATION FOR MAJOR USE SPECIAL PEILIUT SHALL CONSIST OF AN EXECtM:D RESOLUTION BY THE MIAMI CITY COMMISSION AND A DEVELOPMENT ORDER ATTACHED THERETO WHIC'II SPECIFIES THE CONDITIONS UNDER WHICH THIS MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT APPLICATION IS APPROVED; IF APPROVED BY TRE CITY COMMISSION, SAID RESOLUTION AND DEVELOPMENT ORDER SHALL, UPON EXECUTION THEREOF BE TRANSMITTED TO THE OWNER OR AUTHORIZED AGENT AT THE ADDRESS SPECIFIED ABOVE. Note 1. Note 2. Note 3. Note 4. Note 5. Note 6. THE 1800 CLUB ADDENDUM TO APPLICATION FOR MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT July, 2001 Request for Major Use Special Permits for: a) To construct a mixed use project comprised of residential units, office and commercial space. b) To construct a parking structure containing 633 spaces, a) Class H to permit reduction of loading berths. b) Class H to permit new construction in SD -6. a) Class I to permit permanent recreation facilities. b) Class I to permit the staging and parking during construction. c) Class I to permit development/construction/rental signage and trailer. d) CIass I to permit construction fence. e) Class I to permit valet parking. To request from the City Commission: a) a waiver from the noise ordinance during the required concrete pours for construction of the project. To apply for all lesser permits as may be required to allow development and construction of this phase project as contemplated ander this Major Use Special Permit application as submitted and as per plans on file,. The above Major Use Special Permit is to encompass all lower ranking special permits necessary to complete the projects as per plans under Tab 6 STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI DADE AFFIDAVIT 0 Before me, the undersigned authority, this day personally appeared Robert Ader as attorney for Owner, who being by me first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and says: 1. That he/she is the owner, or the legal representative of the owner, submitting the accompanying application for a public hearing as required by the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, affectin7 the real property located in the City of Miami, as described and listed on the pages attached to this Affidavit and made a part thereof, 2. That all owners which he/she represents, if any, have given their full and complete permission for him/her to act in his/her behalf for the change or modification of a classification or regulation of zoning as set out in the accompanying petition. That the pages attached hereto and made a part of this affidavit contain the current names, mailing addresses, telephone numbers and legal descriptions for the real property of which he/she is the owner or legal representative. 4. The facts as represented in the application, and documents submitted in conjunction with this affidavit are true and correct. Further Affiant sayeth not. Robert Ader, General Partner STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI -DARE The foregoing instrument was aclmowledged before me this�n �'— day of July, 2001, by Vicky Garcia -Toledo, attorney for owner, on behalf of the corporation. She is personally known to me and who did not take an oath. f 11n FAIRTA M NOUk GUEZ Wain fUUC TARP" My Comm Elp 12110M Notary Public -State of Florida No. CC 987M Commission No.: I w►M II08WM My Commission Expires: OWNER'S LIST Owner's Name: Ader Properties, a Florida General Partnership A. Vicky Garcia -Toledo, Esquire, Bilzin Sumberg, et al. Mailing Address: 2500 First Union Financial Center, Miami FL 33131 Telephone Number: 305 350-2409 Legal Description: Lots 8,9 &12 Block 7 of "MI UMAR" according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 5 at the Page 4, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida Owner's Name: NIA Mailing Address: Telephone Number: Legal Description: Owner's Name: NIA Mailing Address: Telephone Number: Legal Description: Any other real estate property owned individually, jointly or severally (by corporation, partnership or privately) within 375 feet of the subject site is listed as follows: Street Address Legal Descriptio Lots 2,3,6 and 7, Block 7 of"MERAMAR" according to o the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 5 at the Page 4 of the Public Records of Dade Coup Florida 0 DISC'LOS'URE OF OWNERSHIP 1. Legal desci*tion and street address of subject real property. Lots 8, 9 & 12 Block 7 of "N� �" according to the plat tbereof, as recorded in Plat Book 5 at the Page 4, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida Approximate address: 1800 North Bayshore Drive 2. Owner(s) of subjectreal property and percentage of ownership. Note: Section 2.618 of the Code of the City ofMiarni requires disclosure of all parties having a financial interest, either direct or indirect, in the subject matter of a presentation, request or petition to the City Commission. Accordingly, question ##2 requires disclosure of shareholders of corporations, beneficiaries of trusts, and/or any other interested parties, together with their addresses and proportionate interest. William F. Ader, Jr 50% William F. Ader, LL[ 25% Robert Ader 25% Legal description and street address of any real property (a) owned by any party listed in answer to question #2, and (b) located within 375 fect of the subject real property. Lots 2,3,6 & 7 Block 7 of "NURAMAR" according to the plat eof, as recorded in Plat Book 5 at the Page 4, of the Public Records of 17,pde County, F�orid � Robert Ader, General Partner $TATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI -DADS The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this dy of July, 2001, by Robert Ader, and who did [did not] take an oath. NaTde: ENotary blit - State of Florida M. RODRIGUEZ Commission No.: m 12/10/04Z CC 9870G2My Commission Expires: +c�erw, 1 oYNs u► 0 DISCLOSURE OF OWNERSHIP* Legal description and street address of subject real property: 9 Contract Purchaser for Lots 8, 9 &12 Block 7 of "MIRAMAR" according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 5 at the Page 4, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida 2. Owner(s) of subject real Property and percentage of ownership. Note: Section 2-618 of the Code of the City of Miami requires disclosure of all parties having a financial interest, either direct or indirect in the subject matter of a presentation, request or petition to the City Commission. Accordingly, question #2 requires disclosure of shareholders of corporations, beneficiaries of trusts, and/or any other interested parties, together with their addresses and proportionate interest. BCOM, Inc. as Contract Purchaser 100% Owned by: Michael & Heidi Baumann 50% Aslan & Lilian Palachi 25% Jeff Palachi 25% 3. Legal description and street address of any real property (a) owned by any parry listed in answer to question #2, and (b) located within 375 feet of the subj ct re 1 property. NIA Vicky Garcia- edo, Esq. Attorney for Qhntract Purchaser STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this '30 day of , 2000, by Vicky Garcia -Toledo, Esq., as attorney for Contract Purchaser, on behalf of the corporation. She is personally known to merrand ''who did not take an oath. 4 EUMETHAtAFiCHENA Name: EllZn &rehpr, Iry COMMISSION Y CC BI%m Notary Public -State of Florida WdThmES�Ap►If 19, + Commission No.: CC My Commission Expires: [ raj _83 * for Contract Purchaser 0 POWER OF ATTORNEY I, Robert Ader, as General Partner of Ader Properties, a Florida general partnership, hereby authorizd Vicky Garcia -Toledo, to represent us before the City of Miami as to the Major Use Special Permit submitted by BCOM for properties located at 1800 North Bayshore Drive, Miami, Miami -Dade County, Florida. STATE OF FLORIDA ) ) SS: COUNTY OF My MI -DARE) General Partner The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2001, byahe,eT�zl ee He is personally known to me or produced 61 as identification. Sign Name: Print Name: My Commission Expires: NOTARY PUBLIC Serial No(none, if blank): r�o MIRrA M. RODRIGUEZ [NOTARIAL SEAL] y Gomm ER OTAHT n My Comm 11110104 No. CC 487062 I 1 PrrWA KW" 1101W 1.0. C 0 DIRECTORY OF PROJECT PRINCIPALS Developer: BCOM, Inc. 1201 Brickell Avenue Suite 650 Miami, FL 33131 Phone: (305) 375-0090 Fax: (305) 375-8183 Michael Baumann Aslan Palachi Architect: Bermello & Ajamil 2601 So. Bayshore Drive 10th Floor Miami, Florida 33133 Phone: (305) 859-2050 Fax: (305) 860-3700 Ray Fernandez Landscape Architect: Bermello & Ajamil 2601 So. Bayshore Drive 10th FIoor Miami, Florida 33I33 Phone: (305) 859-2050 Fax: (305) 860-3700 Elizabeth Newland Traffic: Jack Ahlstedt 46 N.W. 94 Street Miami Shores, FL 33138 Phone: (305)754-8695 Economist: Sharpton Brunson & Company I S.E. 3' Avenue Suite 2100 Miami, FL 33131 Telephone: (305) 374-1574 Fax: (305) 372-8161 Darryl Sharpton Legal: Bilzin Sumberg Dunn Price & Axelrod 2500 First Union Financial Center 200 South Biscayne Boulevard Miami, Florida 33131-2336 Telephone: (305) 374-7580 Fax: (305) 374-7593 A. Vicky Garcia -Toledo, Esq. 1.luaauucs 1'vVLrlaaul. ti9`3�'�•5 a Sr7�?,"Y- 4" 'y �!r''r r- :I4#' ... u" 7C�.si ii��7 �;�,",aa�t f,� •, -yr�i� i � ¢'ltu - rr v '�� '' { i �� C � ' •'�! t 5K, .;{ .0 3�' i�-� iI`. i.•-::� � i.:a5 fif 5: .fs.., Ji. f,'.,"� %: '1 r 275,561 sf Required Provided Difference Net Lot Area (including loading berths) 62,769.1 sf F.A.R. (1.441 Acres) Residential Gross Lot Area. 599,046 sf :.:. ....:.::.....: : 117,892 sf Office Density 27,604 sf 500 Units / Acre Max. 312 Units / Acre -188 Units / Acre Gross Building Area 728,558 sf (w/o garage or pool deck) 4,342 sf 1.luaauucs 1'vVLrlaaul. 'l J,U! ! Sl Gross Parking Area 275,561 sf (including loading berths) F.A.R. Residential 599,046 sf Office 27,604 sf Restaurant / Cafe 4,872 sf Lobby / Valet 4,342 sf Total 848,822.4 sf max 635,864 sf -212,958.4 sf Parking Spaces Residential 1 space / 1 unit Min. 450 spaces min. Office 35 spaces min. I space / 800 sf Restaurant no minimum 0 Total 485 spaces 670 spaces +185 spaces Offstreet Loading 4 berths 12'x 35' 5 berths 12' x 35' Size Reduction only 1 berths 12'x 55' (Class II Permit) Buildine Heieht Roof Slab Unlimited 398-4" Top of Parapet 423'4" Elevator Overide 438-8" Buildiniz Setbacks N. Bayshore Drive 5 feet 18'-2" +13'-2" NE 181 Street 5 feet varies 5'-0" to 28'-6" 0'-0" to 23'-6" Alley 5 feet varies 5'-10" to 21'-6" +10" to + 16'-16" Adjacent Property 0 feet 0" 0" Units I -Bedroom 190 2 -Bedroom 225 3 -Bedroom 35 Total 720 max 450 -274 Offen Space 1 sf Open Space / 57,751 sf min. 57,751 sf 0 sf 10 sf Residential FAR °j i 19010EC-3 W 2.49-17Pt-551, 10 °« 13406� 142 QUIT CLAIM DEED ' THIS QUIT CLAIM DEED, Executed this Af4— day of /'/- A.D. 19 by WILLIAM F. ADER JR. first party, to ADER PROPERTIES, A Florida Partnership, whose partners include William F. Ader Jr., William F. Ader III, and Robert Ader whose postoffice address is 1800 North Bayshore Drive, Miami Florida, 33132 second party: (wherever used herein the terms "first party" and "second party" shall include singular and plural, heirs, legal representatives, and assigns of individuals, and the successors and assigns of corporations, wherever the Context so admits or requires) WITNESSETH, That the said first party, for and in con - ,i asideration of the sum of $ 10.00 (TEN) in hand paid by the said - second party, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, does hereby remise, release and quit -claim unto the said second party ® a . coforever, all the right, title, interest, claim and demand which F_ ° the said first party has in and to the following described lot or � to di N arcel of land, situate, lying and being in the County of DADE „ a U y State of FLORIDA., to -wit: . X LOTS 8, in Block 7, of MIRAMAR SUBDIVISION, according Q y _ to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Platbook 5, at page OL 4 of the Public Records of Dade County Florida. a/k/a 1830 North Bayshore Drive c d Subject to all mortgages of record. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same together with all and singular the appartenances thereunto belonging or inanywise appertaining, and all the estate, right, title, interest, ,lien, equity and claim whatsoever of the said first party, either in law or equity, tothe only proper use, benefit and behoof of the said second party forever. IN WITNESS THEREOF, The said first party has signed and sealed these presents the day and year first above written'/ Signed, sealed and.delivered in presence of; L.S. WILLIAM'17'. ADER f L.S. STATE OF FLORIDA, ) COUNTY OF DADE ) I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this day, before me, an officer duly authorized in the State aforesaid to take acknowledgements, personally appeared WILLIAM F. ADER JR. to me known to be the person described in and who execute4,::tt4_- ­ #i,,, � foregoing instrument and HE acknowledged before;<4 that. ••, ,,.. . executed the same. ` Z) "0 WITNESS my hand and official seal in the County a.n4 ay@ Q j �. aforesaid this It. G'4 day of; j<< A.D& 1g � U ' 4Z [?8l DEC —3 2: G9 nrF ^ R71,14551;�9 � 1 4 I QUIT CLAIM DEED f THIS QUIT CLAIM DEED, Executed this "day of A.D. 19 by WILLIAM F. ADER JR. first party, to- ADER PROPERTIES, A Florida Partnership, whose partners include William F. Ader Jr., William F. Ader III, and Robert Ader whose postoffice address is Florida, 33132 second .party: 1800 North Bayshore Drive, Miami (Wherever used herein the terms "first party" and "second party" shall include singular and plural, heirs, legal representatives, and assigns of individuals, and the successors and assigns of corporations, wherever the context so admits or requires) WITNESSETH, That the said first party, for and in con- sideration of the sum of $ 10.00 (TEN) in hand paid by the said second party, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, does M ereby remise, release and quit -claim unto the said second party o� orever, all the right, title, interest, claim and demand which N he said first party has in and to the following described lot or CL (J arcel of land, situate, lying and being in the County of DADE N u tate of FLORIDA , to -wits oi) � LOTS 9612, in Block 7, of MIRAMAR SUBDIVISION, according o L' Y „M to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Platbook 5, at page o4 of the Public Records of Dade County Florida. C rr �, U a/k/a 1800 North Bayshore Drive mom' N C yTenaDED IN O w-,.: 13 rcl Subject to all mortgages of record. nr r: -c tn••`;rr. 1Fiti�dll G ';EF.I'r IFS s CLEAT CIRiUIi CAJf ti oJ9 2 ,, TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same together with all and singular C3 %he appartenances thereunto belonging or in anywise appertaining, and all the estate, right, title, interest, lien, equity and claim whatsoever of the said first party, either in law or equity, tothe only proper use, benefit and behoof of the said second party forever. IN WITNESS THEREOF, The said first party has signed and sealed these presents the day and year first above written. Signed, sealed and delivered in presef: ��? L.S. ILLIAM ADE BAJ R. L. S. STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF DADE I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this day, before me, an officer duly authorized in the State aforesaid to take acknowledgements, personally appeared WILLIAM F. ADER JR. to me known to be the person described in and who exe .""d••ttre., !. foregoing instrument and HE acknowledged befdt**jte�^,th�jt.'a.•F executed the same. •',� : WITNESS my hand and official seal in the County a;4e 6t�[t�' � r 56 aforesaid this /'r a day of /`lla A.D. 199, . '•••••N �,•'`' Ii is L•-----L•� % /� �L ...... •• , MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT PROJECT DESCRIPTION ARTICLE IC. Description A. Zoning Ordinance No. 11000 1. Section 1304.2.1 Application forms; supplementary materials Section 1702.2.1 General Report 3, Section 1702.2.2 Major Use Special Permit Concept Plan 0 THE 1800 CLUB MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT PROJECT DESCRIPTION Zoning Ordinance No. 11000 I . Section 1304.2.1 Application forms; supplementary materials (a) Statement of ownership and control of the proposed development of activity. The Disclosure of Ownership and Ownership Affidavit are provided in Article I. (b) Statement describing in detail the character and intended use of the development of activity. 1800 Club Projectis a mixed use project consisting of 4,872 sq. ft. of commercial space and 27,604 sq. ft. of office space with 450 residential apartments and loft units overlooking Biscayne Bay. The project is centrally located near Downtown Miami in the Omni/Edgewater neighborhood with immediate access to the 39511-95 Interstate. 1800 Club Apartment project will have on-site parking locate in nine (9) floors of parking decks strategically located internal to the "L" shape building for maximum design and access benefits. The project will also provide a recreational deck with pool and spa/club house. Stores and cafe will be located at main floor, with office space above. Loft space and apartments will comprise the remainder of the high-rise project. The project's advantageous location adjacent to Biscayne Bay will provide waterfront living at affordable prices to area residents. 1800 Club Apartments will incorporate the waterfront to the project with open views to Margaret Pace Park and Biscayne Bay. (e) General location map, showing relation of the site or activity for which special permit is sought to major streets, schools, existing utilities, shopping areas, important physical features in and adjoining the project or activity and the like. The following exhibits are included with the Major Use Special Permit Application and are located under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (i) Location Map: Map of the surrounding street system indicating the project location. (ii) Area Context Map: Map of the project area indicating buildup in the surrounding area. (iii) Aerial: Aerial Photograph of the surrounding area indicating the project site. (d) A site plan containing the title of the project and the names of the project planner and developer, date, and north arrow and, based on an exact survey of the property drawn to a scale of sufficient size to show: E The Site plan is located as Sheet A1.01 under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. i. Boundaries of the project, any existing streets, building, watercourses, easements and section lines; The boundaries of the project and the location of existing streets are shown on the survey located under Tab 5 of the Supporting Documents. ii. Exact location of all buildings and structures; The exact location of all existing buildings located on the Property is shown on the survey- located under Tab 5 of the Supporting Documents. The location of the building to be constructed are shown on the Site Plan, under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. iii. Access and traffic flow and how vehicular traffic will be separated from pedestrian and other types of traffic; A detailed analysis of the site access and traffic flow for the development is provided in the Traffic Impact Analysis located under Tab 2 of the Supporting Documents. Service vehicles will access the loading docks from the service entrance. 1. Off-street parking and off-street loading area; Off-street parking will be provided in parking garages located between each, two residential towers. All parking levels will have access from ground floor ramps. The parking garages will consist of nine (9) levels of parking decks. The loading berths are centrally located as part of the parking structure. Some of the berths will be reduced in size through a Class H Special Permit. 2. Recreational Facilities; Location and access to recreational facilities can be found underTab 6 of the Supporting Documents. 3. Screens and buffers; Landscaping areas are indicated on the Landscape Plan, under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. 0 0 4. Refuse collections areas, Waste collection will be provided by a containerized compactor system located in the service area. These facilities are shown on the Ground Floor Plan under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. 5. Access to utilities and points of utilities hookups. Access and connections to site utilities are discussed in the Site Utility Study located under Tab 3 of the Supporting Documents {e) Tabulations of total gross acreage in the project and the percentages thereof proposed to be devoted to the permitted uses and ground coverage. 117,892 gross square feet 1.441 gross acres 7• i. The various permitted uses. Proposed: Mixed use consisting of residential, commercial and office use Building Footprint: 45,677 square feet ii. Ground coverage by structures. Ground coverage by the structures is 45,677 or 38.7% of the total gross lot area. (f) - Tabulation showing: i. The derivation of numbers of off street parking and off street loading spaces shown in (d) above: The number of off street parking spaces required: 485 spaces The total amount of parking spaces provided: 670 spaces ii. Total project density in dwelling units per acre. Allowed: 1.441 acres x 500 units per acre = 720.5 units Proposed: 450 units / 312.2 units per acres (g) If common facilities (such as recreation areas of structures, private streets, common open space, etc.) are to be provided for the development, statements as to how such common facilities are to be provided and permanently maintained. The project contains several open public areas and walkways. All facilities provided will be maintained by the Owner. (h) $toren drainage and sanitary sewerage plans. Storm drainage, water distribution, waste water and solid waste generation provisions are discussed in the Site Utility Study located under Tab 3 of the Supporting Documents. {i) Architectural definitions for buildings in the development; The design plans are included under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. The development will include 450 units. Typical floor plans for the residential floors are included under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. Office and commercial space will also be provided. (j) Landscaping plan, including types, sizes and locations of vegetation and decorative shrubbery, and showing provisions for irrigation and future maintenance. The Landscaping Plan located under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents, specify the plant types, sizes and locations, as well as indications that all planted areas will be fully irrigated and maintained by the Owner of the project. {k} Plans for recreation facilities, if any, including location and general description of buildings for such use. (1} Such additional data, maps, plans, or statements as may be required for the particular use or activity involved. The Drawings submitted with this Application are located under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (m) Such additional data as the applicant may believe is pertinent to -the proper consideration of the site and development plan. Elevations depicting the architectural character of the project are included under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. 2. Section 1702.2.1 General Report. Property ownership or ownerships and beneficial interest within the boundaries of the area proposed for Major Use Special Permit. Statement of Ownership and beneficial interest within the boundaries of the area proposed for Major Use Special Permit are provided in Article 1. 2. The nature of the unified interest or control. The nature of unified interest or control is indicated in Article 1. 3. Survey of the proposed area showing property lines and ownership. A copy of the survey of the Property is included under Tab 5 of the Supporting Documents. g. Map of existing features, including streets, alleys, easements, utilities lines, existing land use, general topography, and physical features. The existing site features and utility lines are shown on the survey of Property located under Tab 5 and the Site Utility Study located under Tab 3 of the Supporting Documents. In addition, the surrounding street systems are included under Tab 2, Traffic impact Study and an aerial photograph of the surrounding area indicating the project site is found under Tab 6, Page 3. 5. Materials to demonstrate the relationship of the elements listed in (d) preceding to surrounding area characteristics. The Drawings Submitted with this Application are located under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. Materials may be presented to the Urban Design and Review Board for review. 6. Existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan designations for the area on and around the lands proposed for Major Use Special Permit. The existing zoning designation for the Property pursuant to City of Miami Ordinance No. 11.000, as Amended is SD -6. The Zoning Atlas Map on page 23 indicates the existing and surrounding mixed use zoning. The comprehensive plan future land use designation for the Property restricted commercial. The zoning and comprehensive plan designation are consistent with one another. 3. Section 1702.2.2 Major Use Special Permit Concept Plan. I. Relationships of the concept plan to surrounding existing and proposed future uses. Activities, systems and facilities (transportation, recreation, view corridors, pedestrian systems, services systems and similar uses). Article II contains a written narrative of the Project outlining proposed uses, activities and architectural character. This narrative also contains descriptions of the Project's relationsFup to traffic, pedestrian movements, and transportation access. Maps located on Tab 6 indicate the Project's relationship to surrounding streets, land uses and functions. Building elevations, sections and perspectives showing the proposed materials, vertical profile and height, and orientation to streets is included in the Drawings Submitted with this Application. The list of Drawings Submitted is found under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. 2. Existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan principles and designations. 0 0 The Project conforms to the SD -6 zoning for this Property. The comprehensive plan future land use designation conforms with the land use designation currently in effect for this Property. Set back requiremonts•under the Code are satisfied. This design requirement has been undertaken in order to augment the open space for the future tenants use and enjoyment of the waterfront. 4. Section 1702.2.3 Developmental Impact Study. 1. A traffic analysis shall be submitted for an area within approximately 114 mile of the site, or an area including the major intersections to be impacted by the site, whichever is larger. The Traffic Impact Analysis is included under Tab 2 of the Supporting Documents. 2. Economic impact data shall be provided, including estimates for construction costs, construction employment, and permanent employment. The Economic Impact Study is included under Tab 4 of the Supporting Documents. 3. A housing impact assessment. The Project is a residential project comprised of 454 residential units commercial and office space will be available within the project 4. A description of proposed energy conservation measures shall be provided, including only those measures that are proposed in addition to the minimum requirements in State Energy Code. Architecturally, the building envelope will be comprised of insulated walls and roof. Electrically, all exterior and landscape lighting will be controlled by means of time clocks and photocell switches. Energy saving lamps, ballasts and fixtures are being considered in all common areas. S. Historic buildings. There are no historic structures located on the Property. 6. Environmental zone. The Property is not located within an environmental preservation district. v-19'12 0 0 7.800 NORTH BAYSHORE DRIVE SD-6/CENTRAL COMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS MUSP, per Article 17, Section 1701 (7) for a pariung structure of 670 parking spaces. - Class II Special Permit, per Article 9, Section 923.4, to request five 12 x 35 loading berths and omit one 12 x 55. � x j ..' 4 � / Znee McPhee ing Inspector 11 Date i � 7 -_4 ZA LF -4 C r .......... ; 79 TmE 1800 CLUB MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT AUGUST 7, 2001 (D SERIMLLO-AJAML & PARTNERS -INC A;tCHITFCTU;11! / ENCLINEERINa I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE I INTERIOR DESIGN =IAZLILD, AJAWL & PARTNERS INC. 2801 DUTH SAYSHORE DRIM MIAMI, VL 33133 ! 19 ,, 1366) 659-2060 FAX, *051 859-9538 OWNER BCDM, INC. 1 1500 CLUB LTD. 1901 BRLCKELL AVE, SUITE 660, MIAMI, K 23131 ;'E- 1305) 376-0000 FAX, 13051 376-ST83 ILI TPP 1 Rau II IL.I a-DIMFMBIONAL MODEL CONTEXT STUDY Z Z TPP 1 Rau II IL.I a-DIMFMBIONAL MODEL CONTEXT STUDY ,SA NSLIGytlio. Drin WN 4,ft 12 LdnIA 7. d a&Q,AR.,a 0—t b br PlxAsedsa l,cad.dn,lsl [laah 0, x Pysldew Pi6Ea R.cvids d,AmdO,l, ca.dy. Fb�ba ormzxN 664 A=cftOn don Ri b86d.MM.p[,pw by1M ml G[yGxmu wiim gas prM+hrm,Na 11GSeu-0Otawiallo, „60a. ADEd by Adi e. ert OM GVpU, I C&0 Gr f4mRd.I RWdw" EMhkb[ a1" zarrou.�w�e.dEM (]tyd I,Ew.4 sr.11.. TG6TSCD ME$ Nbo9.t by mft 0.6.n w7, eys. Na.,(B cw" Cm+drc{N NndiwAr Obbk4) d Ins 7xlpOdbuiosWEr OEyd U-14 Fk6* m, P., Iw..sw. bulnd0mn.dmIn16M1My dwEI�V w� e14Y...e.,.sM,dn.nb....WeY,nduh,. OENWI Y WP Pn, +. No fty,p, IM, . wo- ria..w— RigOrd.50 4W WO -ft 4. MMrrWtum,bx.d) NR WrAM 62.ml r [1h11 Ila„ ,A—,am b, --kLf e. -/ ~bll S.—Av 6 MOPho sn WIML. Qamw-. F1tlA Npry,.d.2A 6— 2302, Uw1.d tlwdrlfr nr 4 u,a.W4hMld6M,gabEq.s..l I), d-f-W-Wab,J(ea[bd.d knbd k, Pw . 1$7=0111,692 P1raxblw«Nwe, R.yWerM tk/.M r„ «NE 1EN Ctrwl,e.e•Nyw•p i. tl FAX bIc PwnfY?.N Ds.Ar4.4 [M0.E00.7.8Kv. Ne. t. th. Eoor,ns M M nrdw4r Ir.,nuy acl srassd w2r.a.12 �p MO/IIrA{)YJpiM6w pwsbf w. 14y,2.2.6iS,622Atllw,dnm RP,M,2y NS,e61.E pnana 16h PW V,& N W h1:• 4S.a. 6n6.Q 5W .Nw 1,,4o bshra A YW.MMI b.e ninll,.nr61w1 bd.pEl sid nortiJrtrn npAwn,nb RMY FiwW }sm._ 2:rb(Nafi 9.Ylbos IaEnk 6 R v"j4EYhr(. Iew8lMrk bR R No171 h*�,A elaP,MYk OR EEr"%, b. [M.,k t6 -i dbd6(m 1NA e1,•4 6R 1riEt{MEyk 6h NeArpq,rlapep.ny):a oPelerAp E►�..m.,q:rtw'NeMr,RkM AMd. a ha e0ea<6.OP. 1121,, aYrYn.n tl e..NY�a*, Tool r W.^.p,t+MlrN P=�,�br...nwn Ifol,a�+wraen.lauid.l wu r.._ t..sar1 rn+,.) Iaq+.amoMd.d: wan tl MIWIO ayi.1: NPr Ad.d, e, S2tm.10, d,.dllP.r prklp n�q,.wlMll..n wranP,.: Fa. d.+V I.Im..lriht..m dalr(I)P,l4G.Ps�,saen msril4ln Mbsv Rlpllly 7oE Pa e..>rgle� wdw..r..••iin.+nran.f,laddv .�lo,..ly r�lm.ln,e (ldOlrHybv.re and, nr.4r.mdwll)D+dd•7 g.o,l6rrnsRr, I.. SW f+'ba).V>•+YM dllmrw. FpnIYuYYA[wt, Y lolre„..a IunlsdPNlfq.P,o... Eut. ma�.yx.daM [1).awa b ,.wYoa h.tlesd(100).Sr, IMrlrys ba snr_ 6„l9ui ME4¢i4 •i6a Ep,2ss mh OIb:1l,001r• 3e.p.os, Mn Rs.W,ti/O Sed: AR,.P.as. ." Tkl Pmp2.,G 010.,,Kss.+:.dirM d 1] q,a.,a e„ ply.luly di,SYd Ix m dkW) 6xab. swo. rk. e. dbPW bwfp n�vu`rrrt..n.a W(elp wr,fou [i� bwtM t2',Id,x ss Iud..I,aA.a. , 15 Nah.1b.R.�lrwk,a•MT Yey x is fyl(6ridsrO.0 n Spsdtl PwmII 52aRtl.bm� YAJf 6,IR�Ri011E,3M A11naC uwaMe ZONING DA n A THE 1800 CLUB PROPERTY ASSESMENT GROSS LOT AREA = 117,892 SF --- - - — - - ❑ NET LOT AREA= 62,789.0991 SF -� — — F.A.R. ALLOWABLE = 848,822.4 SF CITY OF MIAMI OFFICE OF HEARING BOARDS PLANS REVIEW Legal Description ��_;di'. *, 1 er ! rx, a x w et ■v x w U14"74 Cx ._ l '+ l .r i� r"re mr P x � m...+ A r•.•... rwr,,.. � .r .a<.,� - Dcic��. }.' �w My arc 4�r 7 +s,or. w �,,,;..y„ awy. r'_." r'°' ` °.' n•'e F � . f. '- U _ �� ' !a r ® S— shoe ru.oe[ 3 } ti Surveyors Notes �!'. .� rtMs cnq+rx '. r} l•e"" '1 �' ® swax, me rwa, s y i f .� 6a.• �f ` Rtt +1 � �. r,,,r « w +.w.e. a xr. rem s....r +:r. 4::: tiR - Dw+O � �u.nerr � • }', � 4 `1� ._ .I O W++arr (ar.as.+e asq g�l'b c• gao,rac to 17 1 12 ��}• rn U fr+.,n..°a no«w'•..'fp'.°.�.�'r�`,.�.y.w..rw'.."`..e.■.�� �mrr. art+ 1LLJ. ,1 _ } } . SIS •�{�{' ■ -~ �n.."emwuiir +n... amo .e,�... r..r ....., ..e Si:lalUtE��ri rs,`aar ries N.E. 18th Street f ri i �, a + xm• } ( urcre w Location Sketch ro•-or 7„.u7 _ �•_ _,� , ,f �� Symbols Legend __ _ Rl aosmrroao.�,■r l/ f r,nt oK sr.w ! � � 1 LL ! ro• ee x rr re• hr[naq -i +.a new na'0r - _ - k rn 'a•.��o-cs IISS�4L��� i i s •it ,°• IfI __PL w.0 u ' • r„rx avarrrt - t a T® ®( ...�n s...�, --LLIhW___U,M - I w� rP1�'{�g ms`s' 1 �-' � f,]e• f"" 1 +sk Roae nn. - am q� u a, u' !e (' , sra•rs l k 3 & IC jA JL _IL m ,! f� ,. # y .••nv R.Qf � i] 1 W41Mf ��,fr �%1 �•0 j I tD 10 J I W.ar .ww.n'u i� Gr4 .swwer roa , IR _ � -� I 1 �� • • X ®•r - !{r_ J - S (fir -may"= I r..n.oi�q ww ase � � ;h, w ...., •.•Wrwrr>_r ... ,+.r w-.a..r ....+, w�w.o+.r .. �}e _. `µ-'.-■ ...y �...r•.w w.:. r r. r:,..r. r..., .. r w ew w ra.a •/.ry •..o+r •... n7 w r.. -... v,er7f7vt.. ������ttt000 f _ ..+r rr..r ,,r. w. r�'i war w .r •rw..r. .. ..,a. !rl r.x w �.. �_.. _ _ l.._ , - � -,sf m• r+un ,-jam _ +•)1f d' - � •.•+c fV +.w w.. r... rr,.ar.,r..e•....« r.....«w .:,. � .r.r .+.., ...r � w ...r ... ._ O O mo • e �O � j X w.rw..sY..." rrrd rw . r•+r..«i-.. � .� � . r w wr. r r.r w.�.r. hJ raw r.,t .w ams : O I '�..,.. .•..r. mY ... r.,.. r, .+� w .�aa...r °w rr...a ......r.....+=.+r crw.e.,,, Y nurao p wsriu.o _ C pJ +w.. r .*.,. w w w.r �...w a .ww+ M w.w• r •ae.w�w �. � �w w.r .r w ry.rr (D •r�w"wf+rbr. wrr.K. ..nJr "K..'-''""�. ej F -I 1111 _Cf re �1. - - 'n..Ro•w_ _._..__...._ �.ra� r �v t=jaF ,., _ «+x....r. r w rr.• w.w a m..-..« ^^+' t..... r .nw.r.. ter. 1 .. ... - - !re' Wil n �IrJ -.. ..., _ �1 ( a>r.. w......,.r.. e.r. rr ..,......, .. r.../y >+r sr«..Gr+. . r' s...rwe .r ..,.•/ r ... aw. s i,« -ti 0 SiA. /r faro. 4 NORTH MYSHORE DRCVE 'K. 1 4. a CITY -�F OFMCE OF HEARING C�sUl—'3 P� U L U B 77, Fa� SITE PLAN SCALE, V 20,-0, Sjqn,,tt:re ar)ov-, jy approval PLANT Lf5_i II �Caot m,t,/ of+�e�+ uab�r»' mul POIm pq _ 7p'=17' - _-- Ig' la- _ 11' As Snc•n IT: 7 JAnoi re�+gl0 ih011q pym (R 8 - 10' fi - 8' II 4erl0 mp.lF �r.•Y•yo V6�19m'nr Pdm 1nE 10. - 17;_ _8=t0 6• - 10• . __ As 580.n b—•. FMq*Y r�rH o ndY Pdm�— 6. 6. __. ., ti xA As SnO.n u7— i ;v—r—f, 85 S/re✓%-b aynp u8 01 P�oEne 5 (,a }b• - 18- 7a . 36^ 717 BaYnn� Jq/ -� wgorxl� {P___, -`'Pre) SG6 jl_- 36- 71- _ 54 -- .- yb• Pr•_ 111 _ S ,rom,r e_.Y..�.. _ r,.?nn,,r:.n Grel _ s cu 71•_.75• 71_ _ K. .. ----- M- • TH E 18 0 0 C L U B POOL DECK - 87N F4OCR" r Y .'.;I17fOv�1 SCALE. P • SB' -O' I 0 1 .�� HANDICAP SIGN �4 —4 - TYPICAL STALL TYPICAL HANDICAP STALL CONC. WHEEL STOP DETAIL h L- 6 U 0 C IL U B SITE PLAM SCALE. 11' - 20'-01 �: & cb �'. - 95 CD i. Da!e IF ;,gnn' Dalc Signator© at;ovt r,;jpjya)projLt ET x THE 1800 CLUB. MST FLOOR PLAN ILCUBYI SCALE. V- 15'-0' 0 0 OFFICE F, : ... ...... ------------------ 4�3 r,jiinwLT F3y- �2 1 52 ICSD FD1 —a =L CrF-Yo-:- 6 1 L.,sApDS P&M OF REAM PLANS aF-vjc-tv PLbfk- ()Vjo'j ---------- Da�0 Date fD 5 pla Signatureatmv, E ------ EARN -- aDARDS PLANS REIP,-7�' p:1 0 Public wM' ate H t 18 u u u L u B OFFICE FLOORS 253 SCALE, V- lo' -O' Planning - Date E)r Signature -bw, I A 17 . i 41 IMI �2 1 52 ICSD FD1 —a =L CrF-Yo-:- 6 1 L.,sApDS P&M OF REAM PLANS aF-vjc-tv PLbfk- ()Vjo'j ---------- Da�0 Date fD 5 pla Signatureatmv, E ------ EARN -- aDARDS PLANS REIP,-7�' p:1 0 Public wM' ate H t 18 u u u L u B OFFICE FLOORS 253 SCALE, V- lo' -O' Planning - Date E)r Signature -bw, I i 41 IMI �2 1 52 ICSD FD1 —a =L CrF-Yo-:- 6 1 L.,sApDS P&M OF REAM PLANS aF-vjc-tv PLbfk- ()Vjo'j ---------- Da�0 Date fD 5 pla Signatureatmv, E ------ EARN -- aDARDS PLANS REIP,-7�' p:1 0 Public wM' ate H t 18 u u u L u B OFFICE FLOORS 253 SCALE, V- lo' -O' Planning - Date E)r Signature -bw, I 97* ITY OFFICE :C�7 I �_ THE 1800CLUiJ C 1a,r��r TOWNHOUSE FLOORS 4-0SCALE. V 0, 0 � N POOL DECK - 9TH FLOOR SCALE. V - 15,0, *I CIT -f .7F:lrF, I M, UAW — signature above 600', .T'PIV aP TOVL1 0 E 1 800 C b POOL DECK - 9TH FLOOR SCALE. V - 15,0, *I CIT -f .7F:lrF, I M, UAW — signature above 600', .T'PIV aP TOVL1 0 A 0 6-7-M T H E 1 8 0 0 C L U R BY- An& -14 10TH FLOOR SCALE. V ......... . ILI .1 1 rl i 0% A i I I B I t 11 t 1 6 U L U TYPICAL RESIDENTIAL FLOORS 11.35 SCALE. V 0 n7 - 'ARDS pt 1 it By., Sic---- THE 1800 CLUB TYPICAL RESIDENTIAL FLOORS 36-40 SCALE. V • 16,01 CITY C7 (?F r,ply L,.pprcl�17 0 r..e-eviin .iai ' � ° •■rri..sm.rn.aunn..nn� 1. netr.:ron �,.I'M S.S. � 1 ......•.wtrr... ..r.. s L�`on y� 44 � i - ���; - ,,,� a ..mY�.w.n.nn..eeO�•• _ ....m.r..r...v.rn....n n I_�-.....n ---• �. . r en.tn..s. n.�'al .....rr.m.r,.ry.r...r.m• len- - R,I . r.....rr....m. linty efen�.t:t n � m..•..a. ti•.rnrin�:o. SS n..i,.....,r.allfttift..i.,la 'f ! 1!._ ttz..n _. R.. •. .1 t1e�. •.n.ewu. n1.�R:Y � nrrwr..v..r.n...r•...tm. L�'�-n..m ll ....r...[rt,oEIr:-lnYrr.m yJr..l .r...nrr..vL. n......aw e..---_w .+• ...nir.n.n.a.. u•a..n..11f... • r....n..n.u..........ri..• r..1Y......n. n!!..•.re •srsoa..rtn Le I±inw �.....-. n.nr. •'=Rr...rn.en.nr�l:: ' •.,!■NYr.....TI..r.....YYn w F�^ �.f`...-.,.yr.��� 1, .. �.r.. ....r nn.m�+:�} v ■.Y.nsnr..n..AR■1Y.rn 1.. ..iitwn rnlerer-r,alY ..nrt.rs..n...*:..tr.....���: v n.r..,n.•.�.1.Yr.v.an ti z..e.m r_.me.es, .�.:. .Rrr..nu......nr=.n..mYylll: n m.m.........ir■..nenn u L .,-nz..n .,•.-rwrta: ° Ls.a,•....., •e=..rnnnf}Yu n � ..wsv..n....erir.. L>•,e--o-on [.....nrr........r .....n..aM.:: ... r•,..n..n.. n r.. L� .� n.....,n...............nn�:' :1 i � it ......_.....nnrl•�': a Lave-. ee m� ..r _., :.;: ..rYr....rt.:r.r,.....•ri :: Com..„ j.'iiniii' eta ;1 r. m viii�!L[��1�[} Film iTi7 a. . :: li��ll:liel rf/iiiia]rr :: i,1i I: TT+1 iso .iT.'il�T :a; IN I,r� IRR ■ i•ii .i.7ii1n 1.sa:, . aa. � . ■n ■o=nnea...nu,■ m■ntte aa� ! .a • ua — ��er "®".�s � an uu■ ■utrs..arma.t a �i a=...iST ��� n.n[ ■.■... : .:,n[ .■nl■.: ■ it t �I• - :..Il:.:�■ ..._E,. �; �< _-�•...-■� tk�i�. li)��, i�11 NORTH ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION THE 1800 CLUB ELEVATIONS SCALE. t' . 30•-6• E9 E '? _ Y Y � �s 4 J T� b 1b CITY a OFFICE r):= Fir ,� r ,,,,- r I .-.:.jinn-- r,,— A df �_: I 8� .cii�l�:u�gY• "': . L'l :1: rt1IV. • The 1800 Club Developed By: BCOM, Inc. 1201 Brickell Avenue Suite 650 Miami, FL 33131 Designed By: Bermello Ajamil & Partners . 2601 So. Bayshore Drive 10th Floor Miami, Florida 33133 Prepared for: BCOM, Inc. By: Bilzin Sumberg Dunn Baena Price & Axelrod LLP Vicky Garcia -Toledo, Esq. 2500 First Union Financial Center 200 South Biscayne Boulevard Miami, FL 33131 Submitted into the public record in connection with item on �" f Walter Foeman 1272 City Clerk • 0 THE 1800 CLUB MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT TABLE OF CONTENTS T. Project Information A. Application for a Major Use Special Permit B. Disclosure of Ownership 11 C. Ownership Affidavit 1. Warranty Deed 2. Folio Number Information 3. Power of Attorney - Owner 4. Disclosure of Ownership for Contract Purchaser D. Directory of Project Principals E. Project Data Sheet • F. City of Miami Zoning Atlas Map II. Project Description A. Zoning Ordinance No. 11000 1. Section 1304.2.1 Application Forms; Supplementary Materials 2. Section 1702.2.1 General Report 3. Section 1702.2.2 Major Use Special Permit Concept Plan III. Supporting Documents Tab 1 Minority Construction Employment Plan Tab 2 Traffic impact Analysis Tab 3 Site Utility Study Tab 4 Economic Impact Study Tab 5 Survey of Property Tab 6 Drawings Submitted July, 2001 ubmltt0d Onto the pubs record inco no-otion with on item Yz-i-- Walter Foeman �- 12, '1 w City Glerk 0 0 1 THE 1800 CLUB MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT PROJECT INFORMATION ARTICLE I. A. Application for a Major Use Special Permit B. Disclosure of Ownership C. Ownership Affidavit 1. Warranty Deed 2. Folio Number Information 3. Power of Attorney - Owner 4. Disclosure of Ownership for Contract Purchaser D. Directory of Project Principals E. Project Data Sheet F. City of Miami Zoning Atlas Map July, 2001 Submitted into the public record in connection with item on V ^ 1 I -o� Walter Foeman M a City Clerk rod B iLi • CITY OF MIAMI PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPLICATION FOR MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT IT IS INTENDED THAT MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMITS BE REQUIRED WHERE SPECIFIED USES AND/OR OCCUPANCIES INVOLVE MATTERS DEEMED TO BE OF CITYWIDE OR AREA -WIDE IMPORTANCE. THE CITY COMMISSION SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR DETERMINATIONS ON APPLICATIONS FOR MAJOR USE S P ECIA L PERM ITS. (SEEARTICLE17OFORDINANCE I1000,ASAMENDED, THE ZONING ORDINA NCE OF THE, CITY OFMIAMI, FLORIDA.) THE CITY COMMISSION SHALL REFER ALL APPLICATIONS FOR MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMITS TO THE PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD AND TO THE DIRECTOR OF THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT FOR RECOMMENDATIONS, AND MAY MAKEREFERRALS EFERRALS TO AGENCIES, BODIES, OR OFFICERS, EITHER THROUGH THE PLANNING DEPAR"T"MENT OR DIRECTLY, FOR REVIEW, ANALYSIS AND/OR TECHNICAL FINDINGS AND DETERMINATIONS AND REPORTS THEREON. (SEESECTION 1301.5 OF ORDINANCE 11000, AS AMENDED, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA) SECTION 2.633 OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, AS AMENDED, GENERALLY REQUIRES ANY PERSON WHO RECEIVES COMPENSATION, REMUNERATION OR EXPENSES FOR CONDUCTING LOBBYING ACTIVITIES TO REGISTER AS A LOBBYIST WITH THE CITY CLERK, PRIOR TO ENGAGING IN LOBBYING ACTIVITIES BEFORE CITY STAFF, BOARDS, COMMITTEES AND THE CITY COMMISSION. A COPY OF SAID ORDINANCE IS AVAILABLE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK (MIAMI CITY HALL), LOCATED AT 3500 PAN AMERICAN DRIVE, MIAMI, FLORIDA 33133. NOTE: THIS APPLICATION MUST BE TYPEWRITTEN AND SIGNED IN BLACK INK I, Vicky Garcia -Toledo as attorney for BCOM, Inc., as contract purchaser hereby apply to the Director of the Planning Department of the City of Miami for approval of a Major Use Special Permit under the provisions of Article 17 of the City of Miami Zoning Ordinance. Property Address: 1800 North Ba shore Drive _ Nature of proposed use (be specific): A mixed use project with main level commercial offices ace and residential apartments with parking garage and recreational amenities. SUDMItted into thelie record in connection with APPLICATION MATERIALS item P2 -1 on E ^ 0I I attach the following in support and explanation of the application: Walter FoeCi a City Clerk 1. Two original surveys, prepared by a State of Florida Registered Land Surveyor within one year from the date of application. 2. Affidavit disclosing ownership of property covered by application and disclosure of interest farm (attach forms 4-83 and 4a-83 to application). 3. Certified list of owners of real estate within a 500 -foot radius from the outside boundaries of property (attach form 6-83 to application). 1,,"12 E 4. Maps of the: (a) Existing zoning designation. (b) Adopted comprehensive plan designation for areas on and around the property. 5. General location map showing relation to the site or activity to major streets, schools, existing utilities, shopping areas, important physical features in and adjoining the project, and the like. 6. Concept Plan (a) Site plan and relevant information per Section 1304.2.1d -h. (b) Relationships to surrounding existing and proposed futures uses and activities, systems and facilities, per Section 1702.3.2a. (e) How concept affects existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan principles and designations; tabulation of any required variances, special permits, changes of zoning or exemptions, per Section 1702-3.2b. 7. Developmental Impact Study (an application for development approval for a Development of Regional Impact may substitute). S. Other (be specific):See Addendum to Application for Major Use Special Exception. 9. Fee of $ , for the Major Use Special Permit, based on current fee schedule as set forth in Chapter 62 of the Code of the City of Miami, as amended. 10 Additional fee of $ , for any required special permits, changes of zoning or variances set forth in chapter 62 of the Code of the City of Miami, Total Fee: $ Signature Name Address Phone/Fax Date 305-350-2409 / 305-374-7593 '30 Zoo L— FINAL APPROVAL OF THIS APPLICATION FOR MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT SHALL CONSIST OF AN EXECUTED RESOLUTION BY THE MIAMI CITY COMMISSION AND A DEVELOPMENT ORDER ATTACHED THERETO WHICH SPECIFIES THE CONDITIONS UNDER WHICH THIS MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT APPLICATION IS APPROVED; IF APPROVED BYTHE CITY COMMISSION, SAID RESOLUTION AND DEVELOPMENT ORDER SHALL, UPON EXECUTION THEREOF BE TRANSMITTED TO THE OWNER OR AUTHORIZED AGENT AT THE ADDRESS SPECIFIED ABOVE. Submitted into the public record in c,,onnoction with item a - ona r 11 �l c) yj w Waiter Foeman 44 Qity Cleric • Note I. Note 2. Note 3. Note 4. Note 5. Note 6. • • THE 1800 CLUB ADDENDUM TO APPLICATION FOR MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT July, 2001 Request for Major Use Special Permits for: a) To construct a mixed use project comprised of residential units, office and commercial space. b) To construct a parking structure containing 633 spaces. a) Class II to permit reduction of loading berths. b) Class II to permit new construction in SD -6- a) Class Ito permit permanent recreation facilities. b) Class I to permit the staging and parking during construction. c) Class I to permit development/construction/rental signage and trailer. d) Class I to permit construction fence. e) Class Ito permit valet parking. To request from the City Commission: a) a waiver from the noise ordinance during the required concrete pours for construction of the project. To apply for all lesser permits as may be required to allow development and construction of this phase project as contemplated under this Major Use Special Permit application as submitted and as per plans on file,. The above Major Use Special Permit is to encompass all lower ranking special permits necessary to complete the projects as per plans under Tab 6 Submitted into the public record jr� t`ornection with Item .'2=9— on -1' - I I -"�' 3. `� �� � r+VaoteCity Clerk • 9 0 • 1800 NORTH BAYSHORE DRIVE SD-6/CENTRAL COMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS MUSP, per Article 17, Section 1701 (7) for a parking structure of 670 parking spaces. Class II Special Permit, per Article 9, Section 923.4, to request five 12 x 35 loading berths and omit one 12 x 55. 21ning e McPhee Inspector II Date Submitted Into the public record in connection with items !"Z `1_ on Ji • 1.-a ) Walter Iwoeman 0 - f City Clerk • 07/18/01 15:45 FAX DISCLOSURE OF OWNERSHIP 16002 1. Legal description and street address of subject real property. Lots S, 9 & 12 Block 7 of "MB?L MAR according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book S at the Page 4, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida Approximate address: 1800 North Bayshore Drive 2. Owner(s) of subject real property and percentage of ownership. Note: Section 2-618 of the Code of the City ofMiami requires disclosure of all parties having a financial interest, either direct or indirect, in the subject matter of a presentation, request or petition to the City Commission. Accordingly, question 42 requires disclosure of shareholders of corporations, beneficiaries of trusts, and/or any other interested parties, together with their addresses and proportionate interest. William F. Ader, It 50% William F. Ader, M 25% Robert Ader 25% 91 b Legal description and street address of any real property (a) owned Y any party listed in answer to question #2, and (b) located within 375 fect of the subject real property. Lots 2,3,6 & 7 Block 7 of "MIRAMAR" according to the plat eof, as recorded in Plat Book 5 at the Page 4, of the Public Records of Dade County, fF}�oridZ,q Robert Ader, General Partner STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI -DADS The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me thisAfday of July, 2001, by Robert Ader, and who did [did not} take an oath. MIRTA M. ODRIGUEZ O7ARY a MY Comm Exp 12JI0104 PuBEiC A No. CC 9$7062 11 Known 1101ha kU. Notary public - state oY rlonaa Commission No.: My Commission Expires: Sabr,-Alv).1 into the public record in connection With item P2.1 on Walter Foeman City Clerk • • r---I L-A 07/18/01 15:45 FAX 0 STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE } ) SS } AFFIDAVIT 0 Before me, the undersigned authority, this day personally appeared Robert Ader as attorney for Owner, who being by me first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and says: That he/she is the owner, or the legal representative of the owner, submitting the accompanying application for a public hearing as required by the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, affecting the real property located in the City of Miami, as described and listed on the pages attached to this Affidavit ,tnd made a part thereof. 2. That all owners which he/she represents, if any, have given their full and complete permission for him/her to act in his/her behalf for the change or modification of a classification or regulation of zoning as set out in the accompanying petition. That the pages attached hereto and made a park of this affidavit contain the current names, mailing addresses, te) ephone numbers and legal descriptions for the real property of which he/she is the owner or 1 egal representative. 4. The facts as represented in the application and documents submitted in conjunction with this affidavit are true and correct. Further Affiant sayeth not. Robert Ader, Oeneral Partner STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI DADE The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 0 �' day of July, 2001, by Vicky Garcia-Tolcdo, attorney for owner, on behalf of the corporation. She is personally known to nie and who did not take an oath. lir MRTA M 110OR f UEZ Nam or�w d MyC*mrnFm, 17/10104 No Public -State of Fl mittod into the ptabfiC a NOW +• No. CG 987062 Commission No.: a� 110"M MY in connection with tiw My Commission Ex0res: • OWNER'S LIST Owner's Name: Ader Properties, a Florida General Partnership % A. Vicky Garcia -Toledo, Esquire, Bilzin Sumberg, et al. Mailing Address: 2500 First Union Financial Center Miami FL 33131 Telephone Number: (305)350-2409 Legal Description: Lots 8,9 &12 Block 7 of "Mff AMAR" according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 5 at the Page 4, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida Owner's Name: Mailing Address: Telephone Number: Legal Description: NIA 118 Owner's Name: NIA Mailing Address: Telephone Number: Legal Description: Any other real estate property owned individually, jointly or severally (by corporation, partnership or privately) within 375 feet of the subject site is listed as follows: Street Address Legal Description Lots 2,3,6 and 7 Block 7 of "MIRAMAR" according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 5 at the Paize 4 of the Public Records of Dade CounM Florida Submitted into the publie record in connection with P2 -I on Jel-o �t �. n iz— water Foeman city Clerk yJ 1981 QFC -0 2: 49 ,9 T " 1,. 5 5 °rC 1 '3x-96 F', 14 Z i�kn ;n Iits .. 0 QUIT CLAIM DEED THIS QUIT CLAIM DEED, Executed this jC, day of /'X A.D. 19 , by WILLIAM F. ADER JR. first party, to ADER PROPERTIES, A Florida Partnership, whose partners include William F. Ader Jr., William F. Ader III, and Robert Ader whose postoffice address is 1800 North Bayshore Drive, Miami Florida, 33132 second party: (Wherever used herein the terms "first party" and "second party" shall include singular and plural, heirs, legal representatives, and assigns of individuals, and the successors and assigns of corporations, wherever the context so admits or requires) WITNESSETH, That the said first party, for and in con- sideration of the sum of $ 10.00 (TEN) in hand paid by the said second party, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, does hereby remise, release and quit -claim unto the said second party forever, all the right, title, interest, claim and demand which the said first party has in and to the following described lot or. parcel of land, situate, lying and being in the County of DADS \tate of FLORIDA., to -wit: LOTS 8, in Block 7, of MIRAMAR SUBDIVISION, according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Platbook 5, at page 4 of the Public Records of Dade County Florida. a/k/a 1830 North Bayshore Drive Subject to all mortgages of record. , r,eoe ;•^;�,,;, �` TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same together with all and singular the appartenances thereunto belonging or in anywise appertaining, and all the estate, right, title, interest, lien, equity and claim whatsoever of the said first party, either in law or equity, tothe only proper use, benefit and behoof of the said second party forever. IN WITNESS THEREOF, The said first party has signed and sealed these presents the day and year first above written. Signed, sealed and delivered in presence of; /� L.S. WILLIAM F. ADER L.§ubmittd into the ptxbllC • ��� �!- record in connorNo 1 With II STATE OF FLORIDA, ) item LLI on `} i ? '_ COUNTY OF DADE ) Walter FOOiilafl i I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this day, before me, an officer duly authorized in the State aforesaid City Cleric to take acknowledgements, personally appeared !L WILLIAM F. ADER JR. to me known to be the person described in and who executec,s,t:tte,,, 1 foregoing instrument and HE acknowledged before,,z4 thats . ''•; i executed the same. ` P°;•'F � V o I WITNESS my hand and official seal in the County andiPLO IL t7 r1 r� i aforesaid this .`j �` day A.Bi. 13� �� . R7 DEC 2: 49 A K r. 1 34 9G rr, 14 f QUIT CLAIM DEED THIS QUIT CLAIM DEED, Executed this j -day of A.D. 19 by WILLIAM F. ADER JR. first party, toy' ADEM PROPERTIES, A Florida Partnership, whose partners include William F. Ader Jr., William F. Ader III, and Robert Ader whose postoffice address is 1800 North Bayshore Drive, Miami Florida, 33132 second party: (Wherever used herein the terms "first party" and "second party" shall include singular and plural, heirs, legal representatives, and assigns of individuals, and the successors and assigns of corporations, wherever the context so admits or requires) WITNESSETH, That the said first party, for and in con- sideration of the sum of $ 10.00 (TEN) in hand paid by the said wecand party, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, does t ereby remise, release and quit -claim unto the said second party �S G forever, all the right, title, interest, claim and demand which t N ; he said first party has in and to the following described lot or I.. a arcel of land, situate, lying and being in the County of DADE F E 0 -5' tate of FLORIDA , to -wit: rn A ts°n LOTS 9&12, in Block 7, of MIRAMAR SUBDIVISION, according o x to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Platbook 5, at page y 4 of the Public Records of Dade County Florida. na/k/a 1800 North Bayshore Drive UI C RQfpPn£a IH 4Fil^J A: nttia.ua vv+,. Subject to all mortgages of record. r nine cmrlrl. ar"v.an ..'EX150 lucillm p. c) v CLLRK CINOWT CC l m o a, TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same together with all and singular °the appurtenances thereunto belonging or in anywise appertaining, and all the estate, right, title, interest, lien, equity and claim whatsoever of the said first party, either in law or equity, tothe only proper use, benefit and behoof of the said second party forever. IN WITNESS THEREOFf The said first party has signed and sealed these presents the day and year first above written. Signed, sealed and delivered inf• rese p L.S. WILLIAM P. ADE R. .. L*S.Submitted into the public �J record in connection with STATLe OF FLORIDA, 1 COUNTY OF DADE )item .� � � on la •yQr I HER CERTIFY that on this Walter �oemar, day, before me, an officer duly authorized in the State aforesaid to take acknowledgements, personally appeared t ,,,,,....; City Clerk WILLIAM F. ADER JR. to me known to be the person described in and who exaa.0 e i �4 foregoing instrument and HE acknowledged befdt#,Aet.04!.a�r,.. executed the same. WITNESS my hand and official seal in the County anc�'.Sti,�j ..� � �/` � r• ✓ . any ,.` !., ,1 .� � �� �� kN A;11 A,D. 19 ��Y . �•.,....••,,• {{ JJJ111 aforesaid this /l day a£ '���..� r; 0 04/30/1999 )-'UBI_IC; VALUE INQUIRY FOLIO 01 3231 003 0560 NAME AND LEGAL "ADF:R 1-ROF"'ERTIES 1800 N BAYSHORE DR MIAMI Fl- PROF' ADDR 1800 N PAYSHORE DR I='TXM0i B61 MC4 0100 VALUE Fii s'rORY t YEAR 1997 1 998 Oi kol /1 ggg LAND 593025 x.393025 P1.DG 1000 1000 MARKET 594025 594025" E ubmltlt ,-� ,. °n VAp public record in r;unnc,�,,Iu n with item P2 -t on 1 � � ��VvaltcCity Clerk 33132 1 053 :31 53 42 ASSESS 594025 594025 MIRAMAR I=',Ci 5_4 HEX LOTS 9 & -12 PL.K 7 WVD AND PIR 0F' INT IN %'%' TO COMMON TOT EX ELE:ME NTS NO DEDICATED TO PUBL—IC TAXABLE `5'74025 594025 LOT SILL 39535 ,HCl FT OR 1::3496--141 05087 4 :STATE.: EXEMPT: SALES DATE ;aAL..II AMT PF- i ^•-MORI LEGAL Pf 2--1-'ARGE:L INFO F'!=;3 --F OL rRC H PF,5—TAX Cc:lLL r'F" f»..F,REV ClwNEII FT-13—OCCUP LIC, ubmltlt ,-� ,. °n VAp public record in r;unnc,�,,Iu n with item P2 -t on 1 � � ��VvaltcCity Clerk r7s I 04/30/1999 F -11i DIL *1. C VALUF, )(. * )( PT )% M 0 1 Si FO L f 0 01 3231 003 055(.) I -'R (,) I,"' A 1) D R j 8'3y �,j y Sc .j () fZ 1:7 1) I:Z NAME AND LEGAL VALUIH." HU:3-TORY 0100 ADER F'RZ01"ERTIES YEOR 1997 1990 01 9121 1800 N BAYSHORE DR A N T F"I LAND 3236(35 32,75, 6,3 5 BLDG `fOOO 1000 M A R K IT T 32405 32-4665 ;3;31 321053 31 33 42 ASSESS 324685 324685 M T. R A P1 A R HEX L 0 T E3 B L K 7 WVD AND PROP INT "IN & TO COMMON TOT EX E L E� M E NT S N0 T D E'D I A "('E D TO I -`U El I-. I C TAXABLE 3 2 4 if) 85 32,1685 L 0 T `:U Z E 21'579 S Q 1.) A P E FC f--- T OR 1 3496 -142 0587 4 STATE EXEMPT SALE DATE 09/1978 SALE AMT 3 0 0 0 0 F'F i --- MORE LEGAL PF2--PARCEL. S A L IT T Y F'E I I/V INFO PF3--FOL SRC H 1::'F'5,--Tf)X COLL. I S A L F--" 0/R Pr7--PREV (JWNER 10 1 4fO69 -1 PF8 MEH,.' P F- 13 .-. 0 (11 (" U P L I., C, Submitted into the public record in connection with Item P -Z-1 on Water Foeman City Clerk ow 07/18/01 15:45 FAX ! POWER OF ATTORNEY I, Robert Ader, as General Partner of Ader Properties, a Florida general partnership, hereby authorize Vicky Garcia -Toledo, to represent us before the City of Miami as to the Major Use Special Permit submitted by BCOM for properties located at 1800 North Bayshore Drive, Miami, Miami -bade County, Florida. General Partner STATE OF FLORIDA } ) SS: COUNTY OF MIA.MI.DARE) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me thisd day of , 2001, bye4- r -,4-d e.- . He is personally known, to me, or produced as identification. Sign Name: Print Name: My Commission Expires: NOTARY PUBLIC Serial No(none, if blank): r� MIRr^ A M, ROWGUEZ [NOTARIAL SEAL] ti MY Gomm Exp. 1 . OiAkr n 2ii0l04 w we�tc r No. CC 087062 ! i PaWAY Wiovrn l! MMr I D Q o0s Submitted into tho public record in connection with item P2-1 on r) -o{ Walter Foeman City Clerk 0 DISCLOSURE OF OWNERSHIP* Legal description and street address of subject real property: Contract Purchaser for Lots 8, 9 &12 Block 7 of "MIRAMAR" according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 5 at the Page 4, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida 2. Owner(s) of subject real Property and percentage of ownership. Note: Section 2-618 of the Code of the City of Miami requires disclosure of all parties having a financial interest, either direct or indirect in the subject matter of a presentation, request or petition to the City Commission. Accordingly, question #2 requires disclosure of shareholders of corporations, beneficiaries of trusts, and/or any other interested parties, together with their addresses and proportionate interest. BCOM, Inc. as Contract Purchaser 100% Owned by: Michael & Heidi Baumann 50% Aslan & Lilian Palachi 25% Jeff Palachi 25% Legal description and street address of any real property (a) owned by any party listed in answer to question #2, and (b) located within 375 feet of the subjlct rell property. NIA Vicky Garcia- fedo, Esq. Attorney for ntract Purchaser STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE CJhe foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 04-41 , 2000, by Vicky Garcia -Toledo, Esq., as attorney for Contract Purchaser, on behalf of the corporation. She is personally known to me and who did not take an oath. ELIa89HMARCHENA Name: !lZa.f a,rel� MY COMMISSION # OC SIM EXPIRES:Apol It, 2003 Notary Public -State of Florida Bonded T t PM dfn MUMOA940W Commission No.: CC 8/'S- &8y,* My Commission Expires: C _1dFj , p 3 * for Contract Purchaser SubMItted Into the pub11C record in connection with item �Z� �L' .� on1� -11-' I Walter Foeman City Clerk 2)72 • L—A • 0 DIRECTORY OF PROJECT PRINCIPALS Developer: BOOM, Inc. 1201 Brickell Avenue Suite 650 Miami, FL 33131 Phone: (305) 375-0090 Fax: (305) 375-8183 Michael Baumann Aslan Palachi Architect: Bermello & Ajamil 2601 So. Bayshore Drive 10th Floor Miami, Florida 33133 Phone: (305) 859-2050 Fax: (305) 860-3700 Ray Fernandez Landscape Architect: BermelIo & Ajamil 2601 So. Bayshore Drive 10th Floor Miami, Florida 33133 Phone: (305) 859-2050 Fax: (305) 860-3700 Elizabeth Newland Traffic: Jack Ahlstedt 46 N.W. 94 Street Miami Shores, FL 33138 Phone: (305)754-8695 Economist: Sharpton Brunson & Company 1 S.E. 3`d Avenue Suite 2100 Miami, FL 33131 Telephone: (305) 374-1574 Fax: (305) 372-8161 Darryl Sharpton Legal: Bilzin Sumberg Dunn Price & Axelrod 2500 First Union Financial Center 200 South Biscayne Boulevard Miami, Florida 33131-2336 Telephone: (305) 374-7580 Fax: (305)374-7593 A. Vicky Garcia -Toledo, Esq. Submitted Into the public record in connection with Item PZ,.t on _L;�_- 11-!a/ '� Walter Foeman • • 1iC itYl an • " t ` �a.�.;�;i: &�'y8'.'x"°'B..iS° 6roi.�4� 6➢ µg �'€} E�:� 8�[g, 1/ �' Y9°i � ..°'.°d": € 6g .i? NS£ £�44. �8C"3 ""5. °°". "�8 a`. ��,'°` � rs p?�, °v- 4 k ?; . •, �s,�'xd. a q,aYr F � } - ^°£3^rs gi�� � i&�£i+�4' �„�`S � aq �^�1�'?. �:L<..�F>?«;& "0 9 "�•.. e�� qi • T r:C3.�3 €3�, . �'. i _ ��F5e3t �,< •{^ 48�k� t��"1YiS`s �.h�g�6�aT�- .a`' "°'G ,S..,,s.�'` °e �"� � k'F >��_�� , 3 &�•�A'��'€���� '� t���`�k. g�. .,�'"'"'`'L % �' eii m 'E .°wn.t •`."�' -. `= Y P�. ,?:.?i £.ti ,°gs -++s >..:. :.» ° � '� FF. $v` ...W_.. Required Provided Difference Net Lot Area 62,769.1 sf (1.441 Acres) Gross Lot Area 117,892 sf Density 500 Units /Acre Max. 312 Units /Acre -188 Units /Acre Gross Building Area 72$,558 sf (w/o garage or pool deck) Building liootprnat 45,677 sf Gross Parking Area 275,561 sf (including loading berths) F.A.R. Residential 599,046 sf Office 27,604 sf Restaurant 1 Cafe 4,872 sf Lobby /Valet 4,342 sf Total 848,822.4 sf max 635,864 sf -212,958.4 sf Parking Spaces Residential 1 space / 1 unit Min. 450 spaces min. Office 35 spaces min. 1 space 1800 sf Restaurant no minimum 0 Total 485 spaces 670 spaces +185 spaces Offstreet Loading 4 berths 12'x 35' S berths 12' x 35' Size Reduction only 1 berths 12'x 55' (Class H Permit) Building He_ i�ht Roof Slab Unlimited 398'-4” Top of Parapet 423'-4" Elevator Overide 438'-8" Building Setbacks N. Bayshore Drive 5 feet 1$'-2" +13'-2" NE 18'h Street 5 feet varies 5'-0" to 28'-6" 0'-0" to 23'-6" Alley 5 feet varies 5'-10" to 21'-6" " +10" to + 16'-16 Adjacent Property 0 feet 0" Q" Units re ord tri co 1 -Bedroom 190 �� on 2 -Bedroom 225 � Watw r 3 -Bedroom 35 CRY11 Total 720 max 450 " u -270 Ogen Space 1 sf Open Space / 57,751 sf min. 57,751 sf 0 sf 10 sf Residential FAR • • 1iC itYl an • " t ` �a.�.;�;i: &�'y8'.'x"°'B..iS° 6roi.�4� 6➢ µg �'€} E�:� 8�[g, 1/ �' Y9°i � ..°'.°d": € 6g .i? NS£ £�44. �8C"3 ""5. °°". "�8 a`. ��,'°` � rs p?�, °v- 4 k ?; . •, �s,�'xd. a q,aYr F � } - ^°£3^rs gi�� � i&�£i+�4' �„�`S � aq �^�1�'?. �:L<..�F>?«;& "0 9 "�•.. e�� qi • T r:C3.�3 €3�, . �'. i _ ��F5e3t �,< •{^ 48�k� t��"1YiS`s �.h�g�6�aT�- .a`' "°'G ,S..,,s.�'` °e �"� � k'F >��_�� , 3 &�•�A'��'€���� '� t���`�k. g�. .,�'"'"'`'L % �' eii m 'E .°wn.t •`."�' -. `= Y P�. ,?:.?i £.ti ,°gs -++s >..:. :.» ° � '� FF. $v` ...W_.. Required Provided Difference Net Lot Area 62,769.1 sf (1.441 Acres) Gross Lot Area 117,892 sf Density 500 Units /Acre Max. 312 Units /Acre -188 Units /Acre Gross Building Area 72$,558 sf (w/o garage or pool deck) Building liootprnat 45,677 sf Gross Parking Area 275,561 sf (including loading berths) F.A.R. Residential 599,046 sf Office 27,604 sf Restaurant 1 Cafe 4,872 sf Lobby /Valet 4,342 sf Total 848,822.4 sf max 635,864 sf -212,958.4 sf Parking Spaces Residential 1 space / 1 unit Min. 450 spaces min. Office 35 spaces min. 1 space 1800 sf Restaurant no minimum 0 Total 485 spaces 670 spaces +185 spaces Offstreet Loading 4 berths 12'x 35' S berths 12' x 35' Size Reduction only 1 berths 12'x 55' (Class H Permit) Building He_ i�ht Roof Slab Unlimited 398'-4” Top of Parapet 423'-4" Elevator Overide 438'-8" Building Setbacks N. Bayshore Drive 5 feet 1$'-2" +13'-2" NE 18'h Street 5 feet varies 5'-0" to 28'-6" 0'-0" to 23'-6" Alley 5 feet varies 5'-10" to 21'-6" " +10" to + 16'-16 Adjacent Property 0 feet 0" Q" Units re ord tri co 1 -Bedroom 190 �� on 2 -Bedroom 225 � Watw r 3 -Bedroom 35 CRY11 Total 720 max 450 " u -270 Ogen Space 1 sf Open 0 • 0 MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT PROJECT DESCRIPTION ARTICLE H. Description A. Zoning Ordinance No. 11000 1. Section 1304,2.1 Application forms; supplementary materials 2. Section 1702.2.1 General Report 3. Section 1702.2.2 Major Use Special Permit Concept Plan Subrnitt,jj m:- - €1-0 Public record in COrmaction with item - on d -- Walter Foornan ' -- 1'27 2 City Cleric • THE 1800 CLUB MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT PROJECT DESCRIPTION • Zoning Ordinance No. 11000 I . Section 1304.2.1 Application forms; supplementary materials (a) Statement of ownership and control of the proposed development of activity. The Disclosure of Ownership and Ownership Affidavit are provided in Article I. (b) Statement describing in detail the character and intended use of the development of activity. 1800 Club Projectis a mixed use project consisting of 4,872 sq. ft. of commercial space and 27,604 sq. ft. of office space with 450 residential apartments and loft units overlooking Biscayne Bay. The project is centrally located near Downtown Miami in the Omni/Edgewater neighborhood with immediate access to the 395/I-95 Interstate. 1800 Club Apartment project will have on-site parking locate in nine (9) floors of parking decks strategically located internal to the "L" shape building for maximum design and access benefits. The project will also provide a recreational deck with pool and spa/club house. Stores and . cafe will be located at main floor, with office space above. Loft space and apartments will comprise the remainder of the high-rise project. The project's advantageous location adjacent to Biscayne Bay will provide waterfront living at affordable prices to area residents. 1800 Club Apartments will incorporate the waterfront to the project with open views to Margaret Pace Park and Biscayne Bay. (c) General location rnap, showing relation of the site or activity for which special permit is sought to major streets, schools, existing utilities, shopping areas, important physical features in and adjoining the project or activity and the like. The following exhibits are included with the Major Use Special Permit Application and are located under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (i) Location Map: Map of the surrounding street system indicating the project location.. (ii) Area Context Map: Map of the project area indicating buildup in the surrounding area. (iii) Aerial: Aerial Photograph of the surrounding area indicating the project site. (d) A site plan containing the title of the project and the names of the project planner and developer, date, and north arrow and, based on an exact survey of the property drawn to a scale of sufficient size to show: .Submitted into VIC public record Ili connection vdth item PZ I on la - i l. v t Walter Foernan 1 -~ 1 )'141 City Clerl< • 0 The Site plan is located as Sheet A1.01 under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. i. Boundaries of the project, any existing streets, building, watercourses, easements and section Iines; The boundaries of the project and the location of existing streets are shown on the survey located under Tab 5 of the Supporting Documents. ii. Exact location of all buildings and structures; The exact location of all existing buildings located on the Property is shown on the survey located under Tab 5 of the Supporting Documents. The location of the building to be constructed are shown on the Site Plan, under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. iii. Access and traffic flow and how vehicular traffic will be separated from pedestrian and other types of traffic; A detailed analysis of the site access and traffic flow for the development is provided in the Traffic Impact Analysis located under Tab 2 of the Supporting Documents. 0 Service vehicles will access the loading docks from the service entrance. 1. Off-street parking and off-street loading area; Off-street parking will be provided in parking garages located between each, two residential towers. All parking levels will have access from ground floor ramps. The parking garages will consist of nine (9) levels of parking decks. The loading berths are centrally located as part of the parking structure. Some of the berths will be reduced in size through a Class II Special Permit. 2. Recreational Facilities; Location and access to recreational facilities can be found under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. 3. Screens and buffers; Landscaping areas are indicated on the Landscape Plan, under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. Submittorl. into the public record in connection with Item .- 2- II - on1_a -)) a, Walter Foeman City Clerk C� 4. Refuse collections areas; i Waste collection will be provided by a containerized compactor system located in the service area. These facilities are shown on the Ground Floor Plan under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. 5. Access to utilities and points of utilities hookups. Access and connections to site utilities are discussed in the Site Utility Study located under Tab 3 of the Supporting Documents (e) Tabulations of total gross acreage in the project and the percentages thereof proposed to be devoted to the permitted uses and ground coverage. 117,892 gross square feet 1.441 gross acres 1. i. The various permitted uses. Proposed: Mixed use consisting of residential, commercial and office use Building Footprint: 45,677 square feet ii. Ground coverage by structures. Ground coverage by the structures is 45,677 or 38.7% of the total gross lot area. (f) Tabulation showing: The derivation of numbers of off street parking and off street loading spaces shown in (d) above: The number of off street parking spaces required: 485 spaces The total amount of parking spaces provided: 670 spaces ii. Total project density in dwelling units per acre. Allowed: 1.441 acres x 500 units per acre — 720.5 units Proposed: 450 units 1312.2 units per acres (g) If common facilities (such as recreation areas of structures, private streets, common open space, etc.) are to be provided for the development, statements as to how such common facilities are to be provided and permanently maintained. Submitted into the pub11C record in connection with iters P2- I_ on " c Walter Poeman 12 if 2 City Glork The project contains several open public areas and walkways. All facilities provided will be maintained by the Owner. (h) Storm drainage and sanitary sewerage plans. Storm drainage, water distribution, waste water and solid waste generation provisions are discussed in the Site Utility Study located under Tab 3 of the Supporting Documents. (i) Architectural definitions for buildings in the development; The design plans are included under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. The development will include 450 units. Typical floor plans for the residential floors are included under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents, Office and commercial space will also be provided. (j) Landscaping plan, including types, sizes and locations of vegetation and decorative shrubbery, and showing provisions for irrigation and future maintenance. The Landscaping Plan Iocated under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents, specify the plant types, sizes and locations, as well as indications that all planted areas will be fully irrigated and maintained by the Owner of the project. (k) Plans for recreation facilities, if any, including location and general description of buildings for such use. (1) Such additional data, maps, plans, or statements as may be required for the particular use or activity involved. The Drawings submitted with this Application are located under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (m) Such additional data as the applicant may believe is pertinent to the proper consideration of the site and development plan. Elevations depicting the architectural character of the project are included under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. 2. Section 1702,2.1 General Report. 1. Property ownership or ownerships and beneficial interest within the boundaries of the area proposed for Major Use Special Permit. Statement of Ownership and beneficial interest within the boundaries of the area proposed for Major Use Special Permit are provided in Article 1. Submitted Into the pubfia record in ccnnoctfon with item E—Z-1 on LL--LL--O( Walter Foernan �, �� City Clerk i � I.i2 • i 2. The nature of the unified interest or control. The nature of unified interest or control is indicated in Article 1. Survey of the proposed area showing property lines and ownership. A copy of the survey of the Property is included under Tab 5 of the Supporting Documents. 4. Map of existing features, including streets, alleys, easements, utilities lines, existing land use, general topography, and physical features. The existing site features and utility lines are shown on the survey of Property located under Tab 5 and the Site Utility Study located under Tab 3 of the Supporting Documents. 7n addition, the surrounding street systems are included under Tab 2, Traffic Impact Study and an aerial photograph of the surrounding area indicating the project site is found under Tab 6, Page 3. 5. Materials to demonstrate the relationship of the elements listed in (d) preceding to surrounding area characteristics. The Drawings Submitted with this Application are located under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. Materials may be presented to the Urban Design and Review Board for review. 6. Existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan designations for the area on and around the lands proposed for Major Use Special Permit. The existing zoning designation for the Property pursuant to City of Miami Ordinance No. 11000, as Amended is SD -6. The Zoning Atlas Map on page 23 indicates the existing and surrounding mixed use zoning. The comprehensive plan future land use designation for the Property restricted commercial. The zoning and comprehensive plan designation are consistent with one another. 3. Section 1702.2.2 Major Use Special Permit Concept Plan. 1. Relationships of the concept plan to surrounding existing and proposed future uses. Activities, systems and facilities (transportation, recreation, view corridors, pedestrian systems, services systems and similar uses). Article 17 contains a written narrative of the Project outlining proposed uses, activities and architectural character. This narrative also contains descriptions of the Project's relationship to traffic, pedestrian movements, and transportation access. Maps located on Tab 6 indicate the Project's relationship to surrounding streets, land uses and functions. Building elevations, sections and perspectives showing the proposed materials, vertical profile and height, and orientation to streets is included in the Drawings Submitted with this Application. The list of Drawings Submitted is found under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. 2. Existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan principles and designations. Submitted into the nubile rocord li,j E,c�denec flon with fte7n L r 1 on �l Walter Foeman i City Clerk 0 f� . The Project conforms to the SD -6 zoning for this Property. The comprehensive plan future land use designation conforms with the land use designation currently in effect for this Property. Set back requirements under the Code are satisfied. This design requirement has been undertaken in order to augment the open space for the future tenants use and enjoyment of the waterfront. 4. Section 1742.2.3 Developmental Impact Study. 1. A traffic analysis shall be submitted for an area within approximately 114 mile of the site, or an area including the major intersections to be impacted by the site, whichever is larger. The Traffic Impact Analysis is included under Tab 2 of the Supporting Documents. 2. Economic impact data shall be provided, including estimates for construction costs, construction employment, and permanent employment. The Economic Impact Study is included under Tab 4 of the Supporting Documents. 3. A housing impact assessment. The Project is a residential project comprised of 450 residential units commercial and office space will be available within the project 4. A description of proposed energy conservation measures shall be provided, including only those measures that are proposed in addition to the minimum requirements in State Energy Code. Architecturally, the building envelope will be comprised of insulated walls and roof. Electrically, all exterior and landscape lighting will be controlled by means of time clocks and photocell switches. Energy saving lamps, ballasts and fixtures are being considered in all common areas. Historic buildings. There are no historic structures located on the Property. 6. Environmental zone. The Property is not located within an environmental preservation district. Submitted into the public record in connection with iters Pz- . on IL 1!-° `w'- - Wa ltc, i altar} Ctr�a r^,IC�t�< i • 3 0 ARTICLE III. MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS Supporting Documents Tab 1 Minority Construction Employment Plan Tab 2 Traffic Impact Analysis Tab 3 Site Utility Study Tab 4 Economic Impact Study Tab 5 Survey of Property Tab 6 Drawings Submitted r� L Submitted into the public record in connection with € th item- on i!Walter Cl Cityerk 0 • 3MORrrY CONSTRVCT ION Bina:pitted into the pubft record in connection r tarn Walter Foeman 01 — 7city Clerk L Construction Plan for Minority Equal Opport wity Employment A. The intent of applicant is to provide etnpIoyment and economic opportunity for the unemployed and economic disadvantaged residents of Miami. This will be achieved during the various stages ofthe Project such as application ofpenuit period; Construction Period; and final operation and management ofthe finished project. B. Bid. The applicant of this project, as with ocher projects, has always promoted and encouraged equal employment opportunities for minorities. The same efforts of utilizing a minority labor force in the City of Miami will be used on this Pruiect. C. PIN. The applicant has an equal Employment Opportunity Plan that will be adhered to by all firms involved in the planning, construction, and managoramt and operation of thio Projeot. The following sources vvW be helpful in promoting equal anploymesnt opporWrxities for this Project. Florida Department of Commerce, Division ofEcaxoraic Development . The National Association of M:irnority Contractors The National Minority Supplier Development Council n A. QW. The intwt of applicant is to provide employment and eaonoinie opportunity for the unemployed and economic disadvantaged residents of Miami. This will be achieved daring the various stages ofthe Project such as application ofpenZItp0riod; Construction Period; and final opmuion and management of the finished project. B. xIWJ= The applicant of this Project, as with other projects, has always promoted and encouraged cqual employment opportunities £nr minorities. The same ef'f'orts of UWizing a minority labor force in the City of Miami will be used on this Project. C. gyp. The gxpplicant has aux Equal Employment OpportunityPlan that willbe adhered to byall forms involved. iu the plaming, consu=tion,, andmanagemant and operation of'this Project. The following sources will be helpful in promoting equal employment opportunities ibr this Project. Florida Department of Commerce, Division of Economic Development i Sub-,ni t-. no Vii public record in connection with itemf?'i! on �y Walter Foernan City Clerk I] Florida Department of Trmeportation The National Association of Minority Contractors The National minority Supplier Development Council III, Minority ContrsctQ r/Subcontractor Equal Employment Flan. A. Cjwl_ To promote economic opporhmities for minority contractors and vendors in the City of'MiawL E. BLLragmwd. The applicant's intont is to pursue his successful putpractices ©f hiring qualified minority construction contractors and subrontraclore in every phase of the construction and management of the project. M The ,A.pplican-Vs Policy Stat=ant for Equal. Employment Qpparr uWty. To ensure that the company's personnel policies and practices are admirdstered equally and without regard for race, oolor, religion, sem, age, national ori&, handicap, or veteran status. caii 1. All employcos and job applicants are guaranteed equa tity of ernployimesnt opportunity. This meaus that we will not discriminate against any worker or applicant on the basis of race, calor, religion. seat, age, national origin, handicap, or veteran status. 2. All recruitsn=t, selection, placemen -it, training, and layoffdaeisions made by the Company's supervisors or managers will be based solely on candidates job-rolAW qualifications and abilities. I All employees who apply for a promotion or transfer will be given equal consideration for a promotion or truster, Assuming that an opening exists, the qualifications of a candidate for a promotion or transfer will be assessed solely on the basis ofthe indxviduars ability and merit (as d=onstrated by the applicant's pesrformance rercor4 4- All odwpe rrsonne3l policies andpractices ofthe Company, including compensation, benefits, disciplina, and safety and health program, as well as social and recreational activities, will be administered and conducted without regard to any individual's race, color, religion, sex, age, national origin, handicap, or veteran status - 5. The Companywill establish special programs to recruit, hire and emare the advancement of qualified minority group members, women, handicapped individuals and veterans. 2 �ubmltt'-'rd into the public record in connection with item on 1s -1 I - o 1 r Water Foemar; City Clerk �a. The Companywffl take all necessary steps to ewure that each employaWs work cnvimrunvnt is free of unlawful discrimination or herassment based on race„ calor. religion, sex, ages, natfianA On in, haudicap or veteran status. Submit.tval 1WO tho public rocord in ronnecflon with item P2-1 on at 1�/aitr 44Foeman DIV C19* 0 0 • �t�ral+ � 4. public record in connection with 49m -Pz - 1. on Walter Foeman 1 ;2 7 2 City Clerk 2 0 i THE 1800 CLUB TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Prepared for BERMELLU, AJAMIL & PARTNERS 2601 South Sayshore Drive Suite 1000 Miami, Florida 33133 (305) 850.2050 by Jackson M. Ahtstedt, P.E. 46 M.W. 94th -Street Miami Shores, Florida 33150 (305) 754-8695 August 2001 Submitted Into the public record in connection with Item Z-1 on J2_ -11_-P1 Walter Foornan City Clerk Jackson M. Ahistedt, P.E. Florida Re istration #28258 0 0 St bmltt, sd !t;r 1R,',i PublIo record if) connec'!on with Item 2- Le on JA - u - q t Walter Fooman ukj _ 12 1 .2 City Clark TABLE_I1 rA9L4TENT8 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................... 1 2.0 PURPOSE OF STUDY ........................................... 3 3.0 STUDY AREA ................................................. 3 4.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS ......................................... 5 4.1 EXISTING ROADWAY CONDITIONS ............. . ............ 5 4.2 EXISTING SIGNAL TIMING . ................ 6 ................. 4.3 . EXISTING TRAFFIC COUNTS ............ . .................. 6 4.3.1 PEAK HOURS .................................................. 14 4.3.2 PREVAILING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS ............................... 20 4.4 MASS TRANSIT .............................. . ........... 22 4.5 EXISTING LEVEL OF SERVICE ............................. 22 5.0 TRIP GENERATION ............................................ 24 6.0 TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT .................. 28 7.0 PROGRAMMED AND PLANNED ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS ..... , ... 30 8.0 FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS WITHOUT THE PROJECT ........... 30 9.0 FUTURE CONDITIONS WITH PROJECT TRAFFIC ................... 35 10.0 ON -STREET PARKING...... .............. . ..................... 39 11.0 PEDESTRIANS ....... I ......... . ............................. 39 12.0 PROJECT SITE PLAN .......................................... 39 . 12.1 PROJECT DRIVEWAYS...... 39 ........................... 12.2 PROJECT LOADING DOCK .......... 40 12.3 PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ................................... 40 13.0 CONCLUSIONS ............................................... 40 St bmltt, sd !t;r 1R,',i PublIo record if) connec'!on with Item 2- Le on JA - u - q t Walter Fooman ukj _ 12 1 .2 City Clark 6 7 8 8 9 10 11 12 13 21 21 22 22 25 26 27 28 30 31 32 32 33 ,LIST QE TALES TABLE 1 PROJECTDATA .............. ................................. I............. TABLE 2 YEAR 2000 AVERAGE ANNUAL DAILY TRAFFIC (AADT) VOLUMES IN VEHICLES PER DAY (VPD) ......... . . ........ . . ................... . TABLE 3 YEAR 2000 WEEKLY ADJUSTMENT FACTORS .................................... TABLE 4 YEAR 2000 WEEKLY AXLE ADJUSTMENT FACTORS ................... . ............ TABLE 5 SEASONAL ADJUSTMENT FACTORS ............ . . . .. . .... ......... • .... . TABLE 6 EXISTING TRAFFIC Biscayne Boulevard South of N.E. 17th Street .............. . ....................... . TABLE 7 EXISTING TRAFFIC Biscayne Boulevard North of N.E. 19th Street ....................................... TABLE 8 EXISTING TRAFFIC N.E. 18th Street West of North Bayshore Drive .................................... . TABLE 9 EXISTING TRAFFIC North Bayshore Drive North of N.E. 18th Street ..................................... TABLE 10 2001 AVERAGE ANNUAL DAILY TRAFFIC (AADT) VOLUMES IN VEHICLES PER DAY (VPD) ............... . ........... . ........... . TABLE. 11 EXISTING AM PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT DATA ... . . .......... . .... . TABLE 12 EXISTING PM PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT DATA ................... . . TABLE 13 EXISTING INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE WEEKDAY PEAK HOUR CONDITIONS ......... I . . ..... . ....................... . TABLE 14 EXISTING LINK LEVEL OF SERVICE ......................................... . . . TABLE 15 TOTAL PROJECT TRAFFIC ....................................... . .......... . TABLE 16 EXTERNAL TRIPS ............................................... I ........ ... TABLE 17 FINAL EXTERNAL. PROJECT TRAFFIC .... ................................... . . . TABLE 18 PEAK HOUR PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION . ....................... . ........... . TABLE 19 PROGRAMMED AND PLANNED IMPROVEMENTS ........ • • • • . • . • • • • • • • • • . • • • • . TABLE 20 ANNUAL AADT GROWTH RATES .............................................. TABLE 21 FUTURE AM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES WITHOUT PROJECT ............. TABLE 22 FUTURE PM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMEgWIITHt?g P OJF �ub1T� Ut TABLE 23 FUTURE INTERSECTION LOS WIO PROJECT record in rcnnection with Z" i � WEEKDAY PEAK HOUR CONDITIONS ... , .. , ... item • -On . • • . • • y `y r- filter Foeman City Clerk 6 7 8 8 9 10 11 12 13 21 21 22 22 25 26 27 28 30 31 32 32 33 TABLE 24 FUTURE LINK LEVEL OF SERVICE WITHOUT PROJECT ....... . ............. . . ..... 33 TABLE 25 FUTURE AM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES WITH PROJECT ................ 36 TABLE 26 FUTURE. PM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES WITH PROJECT ................ 36 TABLE 27 FUTURE INTERSECTION LOS WITH PROJECT WEEKDAY PEAK HOUR CONDITIONS .......................................... 37 TABLE 28 FUTURE LINK LEVEL OF SERVICE WITH PROJECT .. . ............................ 37 TABLE 29 AM AND PM PEAK HOUR DRIVEWAY VOLUMES ............. . .......... . ......... 39 TABLE 30 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE SUMMARY WEEKDAY PEAK HOUR CONDITIONS ......... . . . .......... . ..... . . ........... 41 0 Submitted into the public record in connection with item 2 on Walter Foeman 0 h City Clerk • 0 Submitted into the public record in connection with item Pa�j an �' r Wafter Foeman 01 x'12 City Clerk LIST OE EIGIJIR FIGURE 1 PROJECT LOCATION......................................................... 2 FIGURE 2 STUDYAREA............................................................... 4 FIGURE 3 PEAKING CHARACTERISTICS BISCAYNE BLVD SOUTH OF NE 17TH STREET .................... I ............... 16 FIGURE 4 PEAKING CHARACTERISTICS BISCAYNE BLVD NORTH OF NE 19*" STREET .................................... 17 FIGURE 5 PEAKING CHARACTERISTICS NE 18TH STREET WEST OF NORTH BAYSHORE DRIVE ............................. 18 FIGURE 6 PEAKING CHARACTE=RISTICS NORTH BAYSHORE DIVE NORTH OF NE WH STREET ............................. 19 FIGURE 7 EXISTING LEVELS OF SERVICE ............. . ..... ........ . .... .......... , 23 FIGURE 8 AM AND PM PEAK HOUR PROJECT TRAFFIC .................. . ................. 29 FIGURE 9 . FUTURE LEVELS OF SERVICE WITHOUT PROJECT ............................... 34 FIGURE 10 .................................. FUTURE LEVELS OF SERVICE WITH PROJECT. 3$ Submitted into the public record in connection with item Pa�j an �' r Wafter Foeman 01 x'12 City Clerk 0 • EXECUTIVE $IIMMARY The proposed 1800 Club project is a mixed use project consisting of approximately 450 dwelling units, 23,650 gross square feet of office space, 1,600 gross square feet of restaurant and 1,535 gross square feet of retail space. The project includes approximately 623 oto -site parking spaces. The site is located in the City of Miami on the north side of N. E. 1 e Street west of North Bayshore Drive. The site currently is occupied by low-rise apartments. Vehicular access to the site is restricted to two, two-way driveways. The main driveway connects to N. E. 1 e Street, while a secondary driveway, primarily intended for drop-off and pick-up traffic connects to North Bayshore Drive. Two types of level of service analysis were conducted. For purposes of identifying the specific localized impacts of the project, level of service analysis was conducted for the existing year 2001 conditions, and future conditions in the year 2003 with and without the project. These analyses included link and Intersection level of service analysis. After reviewing the results from the intersection analysis and the roadway link analysis, that with or without the project,by the year 2003 there will be some deterioration in the level of service on Biscayne Boulevard. The analysis indicates that, due to other future development, there will be a need to improve the southbound left turn movement at the intersection of Biscayne Boulevard an NE 19" Street. These Improvements would also benefit the proposed project. Finally, the transportation corridor analysis clearly indicates that there is sufficient transportation system capacity In the Biscayne Boulevard Corridor to accommodate the proposed project. Submitted into the public rocord in E on oect� n Wat Rem �' �� 0d Walter Foeman F. '�' City Clerk 1.0 INTRODUCTION The 1800 Club is a single phase development consisting of apartments, office, restaurant retail, and parking. As shown in Figure 1, the site is located on north side of N.E. 18" Street in the northwest comer of the intersection of N. E. I e Street and North Bayshore Drive. The proposed development is summarized in Table 1. TAIDLE 'I PROJECT DATA RESIDENTIAL APARTMENTS 450 DU OFFICE 23,650 GSF RESTAURANT 1,600 GSF RETAIL 1,535 GSF PARKING 623 SPACES The residential component of the project consists of rental apartments. Retail space is intended to support residents and also draw from pedestrian traffic in the area. This pedestrian activity results primarily from neighborhood activity. As planned, primary access to the site is proposed to be via a two, two-way driveways. The primary driveway connects to NE Ie Street. A second driveway, intended for drop-off and pick-up activity connects to North Bayshore Drive. In addition, there is a loading dock area which is accessed by the existing alley on the west side of the site. All loading docks are internal to the site. For purposes of this traffic impact analysis, build -out has been estimated to occur by the year 2003. SubmittoO into 11.10 public record in c onn'_ac pion vvith Item = on Walter Foernai City Clerk JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. THE 1800 CLUB August 22, 2001 c r. Page 1 • • 110 0 • NTS } 1-195 M. AHLSTEAT, P.E. FIGURE 9 . PROJECT LOCATION 1-395 i Submitted Into the pi MIC i connection with item �� -1 . •• D1 Walter Foe€ an _ Go Clerk THE 1800 C1.liB August 22, 2009 A. "" ` 72 Page 2 NE 36TH STREET i NW 29TH STIR EET m Q �� ul BISCAYNE BAY to z all p z civ w x NW 20TH STREET � PROJECT l VENETIAN CAUSEWAY M. AHLSTEAT, P.E. FIGURE 9 . PROJECT LOCATION 1-395 i Submitted Into the pi MIC i connection with item �� -1 . •• D1 Walter Foe€ an _ Go Clerk THE 1800 C1.liB August 22, 2009 A. "" ` 72 Page 2 • 0 2.0 PURPOSE OF STUDY The primary purpose of this study is to assess the impacts of vehicular traffic on signalized intersections and roadways within the study area due to the proposed development by conducting a roadway link and signalized intersection level of service analysis. In addition, the report provides a general assessment of project impacts on parking and pedestrians. Specific items discussed .are as follows: ■ Existing traffic volumes and levels of service for major roadways within the study area; ■ Number of trips generated by the proposed project and the distribution of these trips within the study area network. Future background and project traffic conditions and levels of service; ■ Determination of whether the transportation impacts of the proposed project exceed the City of Miami concurrency standards, and solutions to mitigate any adverse impacts; a Determination of projept impacts on ort -street parking; and, ■ Determination of project impacts on pedestrians. 3.0 STUDY AREA The study area's boundaries were defined to include: NE 22nd Street as the northern boundary, NE 141` Street as the southern boundary, Biscayne Bay as the eastern boundary, and NE 2nd Avenue as the western boundary. Figure 2 shows the signalized intersection and roadway links which are most significant to the project. These include the following intersections: NE 17th Terrace NE 1 e Street The roadway links include the following: Biscayne Boulevard from NE 14th Street to NE 22nd Street Submitted into the publIe record in connection with item 2' I_ on �_n_L� Walter- o=oeman City Cleric JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. THE 1SQ0 CLUB August 22, 2001 Page 3 I M'S i-995 I NE 36TH STREET ku I I NW 29TH STR ET m I Uj } W o Gip I BISCAYNE BAY 7 2 STUDY AREA NW 25TH STREET � II I PROJECT I VENETIAN CAUSEWAY I 1#-395 4 1 I Submitted into the pcbl record in ccnrtccrticn pari z on ' Item W3itm Feer City Cle FIGURE 2 STUDY AREA JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. THE 1800 CLUB August 22, 2001 Page 4 �19�2 • • 4.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS The study area was surveyed to observe existing traffic conditions, identify parking locations, identify traffic counts locations, and to collect traffic count data. 4.1 EXISTING ROADWAY CONDITIONS This section describes the characteristics of selected roadways in the study area. Key roadways in the study area include Biscayne Boulevard (SR-511US-1), North Bayshore Drive, NE 17th Terrace, NE 18"' Street, and NE le Street. BISCAYNE BOULEVARD (SR-5/US-1) Biscayne Boulevard is a four lane divided roadway with striped median between NE 14' Street and NE 22"d Street. Turn lanes are provided at the intersections with SW 62nd Avenue. Traffic signals are located at: • NE 14"' Street • NE 15"' Street • NE 17'h Street • NE 17th Terrace • NE le Street • N E 21 " Street NE 22nd Street This equates to six signalized intersections. within a one-half mile. The posted.speed limit is 30 mph. For purposes of analysis, Biscayne Boulevard was classified as a State Two- way Arterial, Class Ili. NORTH BAYSHORE DRIVE North Bayshore Drive is a two lane roadway with metered parking on either side. The cross-section consists of approximately 42' of pavement. North Bayshore Drive is classified as a.local roadway. Traffic on North Bayshore Drive is controlled a southbound stop sign at the intersection with NE 171" Terrace. NE 971rH TERRACE NEI r Terrace is a two lane roadway with metered parking on either side, NE 17th Terrace is classified as a local roadway. Traffic on NE 17"' Terrace is controlled by a traffic signal at Biscayne Boulevard. Submitted into tlhc public record in comnection with NE 18th STREET item n L on waiter hoeman 0 NE I e Street is a striped as a four lane roadway with a raised median ftF44most part JACKSON M. AHLeTEDT, P.E. THE 1800 CLUB August 22, 2001 Page 5 • on -street parking is permitted on both sides of the street. Parking meters are provided on most blocks. The cross-section consists of approximately 25' of pavement, a 14' median and another 25' of pavement. ,NE Ie Street is classified as a local roadway. NE 181' Street begins at North Bayshore Drive on the east and terminates at NE 2nd Avenue on the west. Traffic on NE 1 e Street is controlled by the following: • An eastbound stop sign at North Bayshore Drive; • Eastbound and westbound stop signs at the intersection with NE 41' Avenue; • Eastbound and westbound stop signs at the intersection with Biscayne Boulevard; and, • A westbound stop sign at NE 2Rd Avenue. NE IV" STREET NE 19d' Street is a two lane roadway with metered parking on either side. NE 19th Street is classified as a local roadway. Traffic on NE Wh Street is controlled by traffic signals at Biscayne Boulevard and at NE 2nd Avenue. 4.2 EXISTING SIGNAL TIMING Existing signal timing data for the signalized intersections to be analyzed was obtained from the Miami -Dade County Traffic Control Center. This data was used in the intersection capacity. analysis to determine each intersWion's level of service (LOS). 4.3 EXISTING TRAFFIC COUNTS There is one existing .Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) traffic count station location within the study area. Data for this traffic count station is summarized in Table2. TABLE 2 YEAR 2404 AVERAGE ANNUAL DAILY TRAFFIC (AADT) VOLUMES IN VEHICLES PER DAY (VPD) Source: Florida Department of Transportation, District 6. U- uOO' 1 JACK60N M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. record in connection with THE 1800 CLUB item on I -L I 11- 0 t august 22Pa9 ee6 Walter Foeman City Clerk — 12 `"l 2 0 0 Turning movement counts were obtained as follows: At the intersection of NE Ie Street and Biscayne Boulevard on Tuesday, June 26, 2001 between 7:00 AM and 9:00 AM and between 4:00 - 6:00 PM. At the intersection of NE Wh Street and Biscayne Boulevard on Wednesday, June 27, 2001 between 7:00 AM and 9:00 AM and between 4:00 - 6:00 PM. At the intersection of NE 17" Terrace and Biscayne Boulevard on Thursday, June 28, 2001 between 7:00 AM and 9:00 AM and between 4:00 - 6:00 PM. Original 24 Hour machine traffic counts were taken on Thursday, June 28, 2001 at the following locations: • Biscayne Boulevard South of N.E. 17th Street • Biscayne Boulevard North of N.E. 19th Street • N. E. 18th Street West of North Bayshore Drive • North Bayshore Drive North of N.E. 18th Street The count program. provided machine traffic counts (without vehicle classifications) summarized every 15 minutes for a 24-hour period. This traffic count data is summarized in Tables 6 through 9. • Weekly Volume Factors Weekly volume factors to adjust raw. count data to Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) volumes were obtained from. FDOT records for the year 2000. Rather than using county- wide factors, Miami -Dade County North factors were used. These factors are shown in Table 3. TABLE 3 YEAR 2000 WEEKLY ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Source: Florida Department of Transportation. District 6. Submitted into the public record in connection with item ELJ_ on t Axle Adjustment Factors Walter Foernan City Clerk I* Weekly axle adjustment factors to adjust raw count data to Average Daily Traffic (ADT) JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, F.E. THE 1800 CLUB August 22, 2001 Page 7 0 • volumes were obtained from FDOT records for the year 2000. Rather than using county- wide factors, factors for SR-81Biscayne Boulevard were used. These factors are shown in Table 4. TABU 4 YEAR 2000 WEEKLY AXLE ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Source: Florida Department of. Transportation, District S. Peak Season Adjustment Factors Peak season adjustment factors to adjust count data were obtained from FDOT records for the years 1998 through 2000. Consistent with the FDOT 1998 LOS Manual, "the median weekly factor for the thirteen highest consecutive weeks of the year (the peak season) for each of the three years" was determined. The seasonal adjustment factor was determined to be 1.025. These factors are shown in Table 5. TABLE 5 SEASONAL ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Submitted Into the pubile record in connoction with itern 22- on tFA1 Walter Foeman City Clerk JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. THE 9800 cl.UB August 22, 2009 Page B 'r t0 J1 � 40 • TABLE 6 EXISTING TRAFFIC Biscayne. Boulevard South of N. E. 17th Street RAW DATA NORTHBOUND ADT 18,028 AM PEAK HOUR 1,121 MID-DAY PK HR 1,295 PM PEAK HOUR 1,553 WEEKLY ADJUSTMENT FACTOR AXLE ADJUSTMENT FACTOR ADJUSTED DATA NORTHBOUND AADT 18,600 AM PEAK HOUR 1,150 MIDDAY PK HR 1,330 PM PEAK HOUR 1,600 60% PERCENTAGE OF DAILY TRAFFIC AADT 2 -WAY NIA AM PEAK HOUR 1,720 8.02% MID-DAY' PK HR 2,580 7,21% PM PEAK HOUR DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION 7.01% K(100) 52% 8.22% SOUTHBOUND 2 -WAY 2 -WAY 16,663 1,720 34,711 1,667 2,580 2,788 1,206 DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION 2,501 883 52% 2,436 1.03 1.00 SOUTHBOUND 2 -WAY 17,200 35,800 1,720 2,870 1,240 2,580 910 2,510 DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND 52% 46% 40% 60% 52% 48% 64% 36% 40% 60% Submitted into the publIC record in cr3nneclion with Rert1. on 2 " - o 1 Waiter Fooman City Cleric JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. THE 1800 CLUD August 2.2, 2001 Page 9 0 • TABLE 7 EXISTING TRAFFIC Biscayne Boulevard North of N.E. 19th Street RAW DATA NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND 2 -WAY ADT 19,781 18,451 38,232 AM PEAK HOUR 908 1,798 2,706 MID-DAY PK HR 1,261 1,266 2,527 PM PEAK HOUR 1,656 1,040 2,696 WEEKLY ADJUSTMENT FACTOR 1.03 AXLE ADJUSTMENT FACTOR 1.00 ADJUSTED DATA NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND 2 -WAY AADT 20,400 19,000 39,400 AM PEAK HOUR 940 1,850 2,790 MID-DAY PK HR 1,300 1,300 2,600 PM PEAK HOUR 1,710 1,070 2,780 PERCENTAGE OF DAILY TRAFFIC DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND AADT N/A 52% 48% AM PEAK HOUR 7.08% 34% 66% MIDDAY PK HR 6.60% 50% 50% PM PEAK HOUR 7.06% 62% 38% K(100) 7.26% 34% 66% Ub ,. _j '.., th- pLiblic �.!"O. _ record 'sjt connection with item or, a 7 Mter Foeman 0 City Clerk JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. THE 1800 CLUB August 22, 2001 Page 10 <j i — 127 7 2 0 • TABLE 8 EXISTING TRAFFIC N.E. 18th Street West of North Bayshore Drive RAW DATA EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 2 -WAY ADT 431 363 794 AM PEAK HOUR 25 20 45 MID-DAY PK HR 30 24 54 PM PEAK HOUR 27 31 58 WEEKLY ADJUSTMENT FACTOR 1.03 AXLE ADJUSTMENT FACTOR 1.00 ADJUSTED DATA EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 2 -WAY AADT 400 400 800 AM PEAK HOUR 30 20 50 MID-DAY PK HR 30 20 60 PM PEAK HOUR 30 30 60 PERCENTAGE OF DAILY TRAFFIC DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION EASTBOUND WESTBOUND AADT NIA 50% 50% AM PEAK HOUR 6.25% 60% 40% MID-DAY PK HR 7.50% 50% 33% PM PEAK HOUR 7.50% 50% 50% K(100) 7.69% 50% 1 33% Submitted into the public record in connecdon with item 2^ o, ' I WaRer Foeman City Aeric JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. THE 'loco mug Augus# 22, 2401 Page 11 :j • C� • • i TABLES EXISTING TRAFFIC North Beyshore Drive North of N.E. 18th Street RAW DATA NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND 2 -WAY ADT 757 487 1,244 AM PEAK HOUR 39 24 63 MID-DAY PK HR 67 36 103 PM PEAK HOUR 57 44 101 WEEKLY ADJUSTMENT FACTOR 1.03 AXLE ADJUSTMENT FACTOR 1.00 ADJUSTED DATA NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND 2 -WAY AADT 800 50o 1, 3o0 AM PEAK HOUR 40 20 60 MID-DAY PK HR 70 40 110 PM PEAK HOUR 60 50 100 PERCENTAGE OF DAILY TRAFFIC DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND AADT NIA 62% 38% AM PEAK HOUR 4.62% 67% 33% MID-DAY PK HR 8.46% 64% 36% PM PEAK HOUR 7.69% 60% 50% K(100) 8.67% 64% 36% M. Submitted Into the public record in connection with item 2 ^ onA' ^ b Walter Foeman Citv Clerk August 22, 2001 Page 12 TABLE 10 2001 AVERAGE ANNUAL DAILY TRAFFIC (AADT) VOLUMES IN VEHICLES PER DAY (VPD) MM B1SCAYNE BOULEVARD NB 18,8(}0 813 17,200 35,800 SOUTH OF NE.17TH STREET BISCAYNE BOULEVARD NE 20,400 SB 19,000 39,400 NORTH OF NE 19TH STRtET NE 18TH STREET WEST EB 400 WB 400 800 OF NORTH SAYSHORE DRIVE NORTH HORE DRIVE NB 800 SB 400 1,200 NORTH OF NE 18TH STREET Source: Original Machine Traffic Counts Taken June Z8, 2001. Submitted Into the public ith ons- ja. 1 jLtb Itemrecordf2 - iterrr L Waiter I'00rctan City Cleric._ JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. THE 1800 CLUE August 22, 2001 . -- 127 2 Page 13 4.3.1 PEAK HOURS This section. identifies characteristics of 'existing peak hour traffic in the study area. These characteristics include AM and PM peak hours, Planning Analysis Hour Factor (Kion) factors ancf.Direction0Distribution (D) factors. Bisbayne Boulevard The peaking;characteristibs of B.iscayno Boulevard South of N.E17th Street are presented graphically in -Figure 3. As can be seen from Figure 3, this section of Biscayne Boulevard experiences the following three peaks.. - An -AU. Peak. of app.roximately.. 8.020/q.beginning at 7:45 AM • A mid-day peak of approximately 7.21 % beginning at 11:45 AM A PM Peak of approximately -7.01 % beginning at 5:00 PM The'. 1,00 for thisisection, of roadway was.estimated to be 8.22%. The D factor for this section of roadway was estimated to be 59,93%, The. peaking charactedstics:of. Biscayne Boulevard North of N.E. 19th Street are presented graphically in Figure 4. As.can'be seen from Figure 4, this section of Biscayne Boulevard experiences-. th.e followingthrge peals An AM. Peak, of, approximately...7;08°/a.:beginning at 8:00 AM • A mid-day'peek of approximately 6.60% beginning at 12:00 PM • A PM Peak of approximately 7:0GWbeglnning at 5:00 PM The K100..for.this;.section-of roadway. was estimated to be 7.26%0.473. The D factor for this section of roadway was estimated to be 66.31 %. N.E. 18th Street The peaking:. characteristics. of. N.E. 18th Street West of North Bayshore Drive are presented graphically in Figure 5. , As can be seen from Figure 5, this section of N. E. 18th Street bkperiences` the folibWng -three• peaks. • An AM. Peak of approximately.6.25%-.beginning at 12:00 AM • A mid-day peak of approxirnately 7.54% beginning at 1:00 PM • A PM Peak of approximately 7.50% beginning at 3:00 PM The K100 for this section of roadway was estimated to be 7.69%. The D factor for this section of roadway was estimated to be 50.00%. sut)) ,9," record in with item r on �i•r • o Walter Fooman City Clerk JACKSON M. AHILSTEDT, P.E. THE NO cLIJB August 22, 2009 Page 14 12 2 r5 F . � 0 • 0 North Bayshore Drive • The peaking characteristics of North Bayshore Drive North of N.E. 18th Street are presented graphically in Figure 6. As can be seen from Figure 6, this section of North Bayshore Drive experiences the following three peaks. An AM Peak of approximately 4.62% beginning at 8:00 AM A mid-day peak of approximately 8.46% beginning at 1:00 PM A PM Peak of approximately 7.69% beginning at 3:30 PM The t<100 for this section of roadway was estimated to be 8.67%. The D factor for this section of roadway was estimated to be 63.64°/x. Subrn itte: u int N.10 public record in connection with item . 2=L on _ [ Walter Foernan Cibi Clerk JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. THE 1800. CLUE August 22, 2001 .I.-12,72 Page 15 • 10.00°/0 8.00% U u. IQ OL H J 8.00% a, LL 0 W hQ 4.00% z W U Or W 0. 200°/ • 0 BISCAYNE BOULEVARD SOUTH OF N.E. 17TH STREET 7 11 I 0;00 8:00 10:00 152 202 HOAR 13tuffriG SUbMitted into thepublfo record in connection wlth on -�' 11-01 Walter 1 obeman MUM 1150 4 i i i rIR i \ii. Y PEAKING CHARACTERISTICS BISCAYNE BLVD SOUTH OF NE 17 M STREET JACKSON M. AHLST DT, P.S. THE 1800 CLUB Aiupust 22, 2001 j ' Page 16 n • 8.00% 26.00% LL LL 1.00°1 0 BISCAYNE BOULEVARD NORTH OF N.E. 19TH STREET i 0 0a 5:00 10,00 13:00 20:00 HOUR BEGINING S('ub mua ;�,o the public record i nnocflon with item 2 '" on -1 .nit Walter Fooman FIGURE 4 PEAKING CHARACTERISTICS BISCAYNE BLVD NORTH OF NE 19TH STREET JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. THE 1800 CLUB August 22, 2001 jj 'Jy3 . �gJry Page 17 0 n 8.0"t NE 18TH STREET WEST OF NORTH SAYSHORE DRIVE LL L. r D IL 4.00°/ 0 W. 0 3,0v z W U W 2.00° a M1iy 0:00 0:00 10:00 too 20;00 HOUR BEGINING Submitted Into the public record in conncciion with Item 2- L on a • 1 ^o t FIGURE 5 City Cleric PEAKING CHARACTERISTICS NE it"' STREET WEST OF NORTH SAYSHORE DRIVE JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. THE 1800 CLUB August 22, 2001 Page 18 • • 40.00°10 &00% U t#. H J 6.00% 0 LL 0 W d ON H Z W U W a 2.00° NORTH BAYSHORE DRIVE NORTH OF NE 18TH STREET J 11 0:00 5;00 4000 45:00 20;00 HOUR BEGINING Subrnit"ed into the public record in tonne tion with item zr ona �11 `b Waiter Fooman FIGURE 6 PEAKING CHARACTERISTICS NORTH BAYSHORE DIVE NORTH OF NE 18TH STREET JACKSON M. AHL9TP-DT, P.E. THE 1800 CLUB August 22, 2001 � Page 19 ;, � .� � 2 • 0 • 4.3.2 PREVAILING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS This section describes the traffic conditions on selected roadways and at selected intersections in the study area. BISCAYNE BOULEVARD Although heavy during peak hours, traffic flow on the section of Biscayne Boulevard in the study area is basically good. Signal progression appears to be good. NE WK STREET Due to the minimal amount of traffic, traffic flow on NE 18"' Street is good. NORTH BAYSHORE DRIVE . Due to the minimal amount of traffic, traffic flow on North Bayshore Drive is good. M. AHLSTEDT, Submitted into the public record in eonnecdon with item 2 ' on Walter Foeman THE 7800 CLUB j August 22, 2001 2 Page 20 s °�C��z .��-44-,,� �'�°`'� '<✓���rs"r 4:,..>L "-Ty�-31 ¢ ".."i � "T�,�:n. F E NEW F� _ - %T�-�tit���. � �G.�1,�. �;;1F�S`".� •cit -�`��E`s����`y;�--P „�-rc� �{�A'c�Y'�- F�`j 5' %-� ��.� �e?'o�^�F_.4�. E �3"S'a� :.:€ �F •�@�' �-+�.-� '—rS' `J zI M•-'� €,..-- Y,�+-:i3 ON W •r" F .1�,,, r_r ,�- r�.�. -u'" vat'. _,s" -- G `zs. �'��,.. 1-00 Its f f ` I 1 :,v 1 � �1 • • •s j x 1 pj::t�2 - -..,� - � �� .;sem.. +' �z�'--a��.� �"� Y � '*•L �'s`�--�` � �„..4- �r� 2p�. � - -i-:r "-z'�e� � �`� ire ..r �� -�^�% -�. gti -s .fir• !�_+s5�'F.=��_ ��} :.a-_�*�r� .. u� .�.a�..._ _�.r�, _cd...�"�_�x���`r^."C _ - ri r ! • . 4.4 MASS TRANSIT The site is located within the Civic Center and the Biscayne Boulevard Corridors. The project is within less then one-half mile of the Omni Bus Terminal and MetroMover Station. Transit routes providing capacity to the corridor are MetroBus Routes 3, 16, 32, 36, 62, 95, T, Biscayne Max, 9, 10, and 6, 4.5 EXISTING LEVEL OF SERVICE Each of the intersections were analyzed to determine the level of service. The Highway Capacity Manual. (HCM) 2000 methodology based Highway Capacity Software, HCS Version 4.1 was used.. The results are shown in Tabie 13 and on Figure 7. The intersection level of service analyses are Included in Appendix A. Link analysis was also performed on Biscayne Boulevard between NE le Street and NE 22"d Street using the FDOT 1998 Level of Service Handbook, Tables 5-1 and 5-4. The results of these analyses are summarized. in Table 14. TABLE 13 EXISTING INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE WEEKDAY PEAK HOUR CONDITIONS TABLE 14 EXISTING LINK LEVEL OF SERVICE Biscayne Boulevard NE 14th Street NE 22nd Street F SUt)rY3i$ ' lfft tile PUDIIU record i7i-"WrlOction wilth Item 2 Ur' '1 1 ro • wafter Foeman City Clerk JACKSON M. AhlLSTEDT, P.B. THE 1800 CLUB ,4 s� August 22, 2001 ;- Page 22 F NE 20TH STREET C/B NE 19TH STREET PROJECT NE 18TH STREET DIF NE 17TH TERR B/C a U C m W w W O z z N U z m z F LINK PEAK HOUR LOS CIB AM/PM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION LOS Submitted into the public record in connection with iters P-2-1 on Walter Foeman City Clerk FIGURE 7 LEVELS OF SERVICE EXISTING JACKSON M. AHL8TEDT, P.B. THE 1800 CLUB August 22, 2001 Page 23 .. -° 127 0 • • 5.0 TRIP GENERATION The total number of vehicular trips generated by the land uses, apartments, office, restaurant and retail space was determined for the AM and IoM peak hours using the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Trip Generation, 6th Edition. The number of vehicular trips generated by the apartments was based on the total number of apartments, using data for ITE land Use Code 220. The number of vehicular trips generated by the office space was based on the gross square footage, using data for ITE Land Use Code 710. The number of trips generated by the restaurant was based on the total square footage of .restaurant space using data for ITE land Use Code 831. The number of trips generated by the retail space was based on the total square footage of retail space using data for ITE Land Use Code 814. This was done in order to determine the worst case scenario. The results are shown in Table 15. These trips are the total number of vehicular trips generated by the project before adjusting for internal trips and pedestrian and mass transit trips. ' iUbmittos_i into the public record in Conne0riori with item P z ^1 on Walter Foeman City Clerk JACKSON M. AHLSTBDT, P.E. THE 1600 CL4JB August 22, 2001 Page 24 i TABLE 15 TOTAL PROJECT TRAFFIC F t WEEKDAY IN 1,416 219 72 31 1,666 VPD OUT 1,416 219 72 31 1,666 VPD TOTAL 2,831 439 144 62 3,332 VPD AM PEAK HOUR OF ADJACENT STREET IN 36 52 1 5 93 VPH OUT 191 7 0 5 203 VPH TOTAL 227 59 1 10 296 VPH PM PEAK HOUR OF ADJACENT STREET VPH IN 176 18 8 2 195 OUT 87 88 4 2 177 VPH TOTAL 262 106 12 4 372 VPH NOTES: 1.) AM traffic for Retail is based upon AM Peak Hour of Generator. The first adjustment to the trips shown in Table 15 was made to account for internalization of trips in a mixed use development. Using techniques documented in the ITE publication Trip Generation Handbook, October 1998 it was determined that on a daily basis approximately 0.77% of the trips shown in Table 15 would be internal trips. For the PM Peak Hour it was determined that approximately 1.23% of the trips shown in Table 15 wouid be internal trips. Table 16 summarizes external trips for the project before accounting for modal splits. Submitted into the public record in cortnec:$io, nith a item F _I_ oo -) 61 Walter Foornan Citv Clerk JACKSON M. AHLSTE©T, P.E. THE 1800 CLUB August 22, 2001 Page 25 TABLE 96 EXTERNAL TRIPS Because of its proximity to MetroBus routes, MetroMover, and the nature of the area, it is anticipated that 15% of person trips will use mass transit or walk. These person trips will not negatively effect the traffic: conditions, and therefore, are not included in the vehicle trips distributed throughout the study area. The remaining 85% of the person trips generated by the project were distributed throughout the study area as vehicle trips. Table 16 summarizes external trips for the project after accounting for modal splits. Submit��,;cs [li,l) ,tits ,Jublic record in connec !on with Item on !! "� r01 Walter Foernan City Clerk JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. THE 1800 CLUB August 22, 2001 Page 26 .1 y 0 0 0 TABLE 16 EXTERNAL TRIPS • Because of its proximity to MetroB"us routes, MetroMover, and the nature of the area, it is anticipated that 15% of person trips will use mass. transit or walk. These person trips will not negatively effect the traffic conditions, and therefore, are not included in the vehicle trips distributed throughout the study area. The remaining 65% of the person trips generated by the project were distributed throughout the study area as vehicle trips. Table 16 summarizes external trips for the project after accounting for modal splits. Submitted into the public record in connection with itemP? on Walter Foeman City Clerk JACKsoN M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. THE 9Boo 0I.uC3 f t August 22, 2009 ' Page 26 • 11 LJ 0 TABLE 17 FINAL EXTERNAL PROJECT TRAFFIC As can be seen from Table 17, the estimated number of vehicle trips entering the project during the AM peak hour is 79 vph. The estimated number of vehicle trips leaving the project during the AM peak hour is 172 vph. Theestimated number of vehicle trips entering the project during the PM peals hour is 171 vph. The estimated number of vehicle trips leaving the project during the AM peek hour is 152 vph. Based upon an estimate of 2 to 3 retail employees; the AM peals hour retail trips appear rather high. These projected volumes likely modestly overstate the amount of project traffic for that the peak hours. Submitted Into the public record in connection with item l on -k 11 ' b / Walter Fooman. Ci,y_Cie�rk, , THE 1800 CLUB August 22, 2001 Page 27 11 0 6.0 TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT l�J 0 The project site is located in Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) 603. The cardinal distribution of the traffic within TAZ 603 was obtained from Miami -Dade County. The distribution is as follows: North -Northeast 8.91% East -Northeast 2.75% East -Southeast. 4.02% South -Southeast 5.04% South -Southwest 26.40% West -Southwest 22.07% West -Northwest 14.90% North -Northwest 15,56% The distribution -of AM and PM project trips is summarized in Table 18. Based upon this trip distribution, the project trips were assigned to the roadway network. This is shown in Figure 8. TABLE 18 PEAK HOUR PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION Submitted into the pubile record in connection with r M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. Wafter Fooman THE 1500 CLU13 City Clerk August 22, 2001 .'J 2 7 "1 Page 28 • • • 0 0 FIQURE S AM AND PM PEAK HOUR PROJECT TRAFFIC JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. THE 1800 C�.UB record in Ut 11'1cctiOn with August 22, 2001 item P on t�, a� Page 29 Waiter Fot:man City Clerk • 0 • i 7.0 PROGRAMMED AND PLANNED ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS Using the Metro -Dade Transportation improvement Program (TIP), 2001, the programmed and planned improvements in or near the study area were determined. These improvements are detailed in Table 19. None of these improvements add capacity to the transportation system. TABLE 19 PROGRAMMED AND PLANNED IMPROVEMENTS 8.0 FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS WITHOUT THE PROJECT Future traffic conditions without the project were analyzed. Future traffic consisting of background traffic and corn mittted development traffic was estimated. Background traffic was estimated by applying an annual growth factor to existing traffic. The annual growth factor of 2% per year was developed based upon the historical traffic count data shown in Table 20. It might be noted that the annual growth rate since 1993 has been less than 1 % per year. Submlttcd Info the public rocord in a,(;Car oo'cion with Item pr l on Walter F oeman City Clerk JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. THE 1840 CLUB Auguxt 22, 2401 Page 34 01- 127 2 TABLE 21 c- X FUTURE AM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES WITHOUT PROJECT . 3 35 : 2045 17 4 1 11 8 3 32 Biscayne 14 802 p Boulevard and NE 18th Street .74 in Biscayne 23 772 41 198 1,854 41 23 11 33 134 24 259 Boulevard and n NE 19th Street 5 50 151 9 103 Biscayne 31 695 132 159 1,807 22 5 Boulevard and NE 17th Terrace Ato7AL Cl2owTH FACTOR 2-0% NOTES. NA- Movemerd Not AvW6-ble TABLE 22 FUTURE PM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES WITHOUT PROJECT py` j !37 2 69 10 1,143 €0 2 1 7 5 ' Biscay 151,607 8oufevard and ea. l" NE 18th Street 133 259 1,105 32 67 22 55 44 2e 2� 77 dyne 41 1,778 Bou evard and NE 19th Street 9 8 12 25 162 14 126 Biscayne 10 1,568 123 157 945 Boulevard and _J � NE 17th Terrace ANtdUAt GRd1NTH FACTOR 2.0°i6 NOTES: NA - Movement Not Available c°I r- ca a 03 • • 0 0 TABLE 23 FUTURE INTERSECTION LOS W/O PROJECT WEEKDAY PEAK HOUR CONDITIONS TABLE 24 FUTURE LINK LEVEL OF SERVICE WITHOUT PROJECT Submitted Into the public re/cord in on tion with item 2r on .AAS i-bl Walter Foeman City Clerk JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. THE 1800 CLUB August 22, 2001 Page 33 <, rd C: • • FIGURE 9 FUTURE LEVELS OF SERVICE WITHOUT PROJECT JACKSON M. A14LsTEDT, P.E. THE 1800 CLUB August 22, 2001 k. .' 2 7Page 34 F NE 20TH STREET DIF NE 19TH STREET *PROJECT ST STREET NE 18TH R FIE NE 17TH TERR BID m w w z N (j W Aa z LINK PEAK HOUR LOS CIB AWPM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION LOS Subrriittod in!o ilei; public record iri c©nne-Von with iters 7-.1 on _1p -t rA Walter Foernan City Cleric FIGURE 9 FUTURE LEVELS OF SERVICE WITHOUT PROJECT JACKSON M. A14LsTEDT, P.E. THE 1800 CLUB August 22, 2001 k. .' 2 7Page 34 0 9.0 FUTURE CONDITIONS WITH PROJECT TRAFFIC Future traffic conditions with project traffic were analyzed for year 2003. This was accomplished by using the 2003 estimated traffic volumes and adding the traffic' generated by the project (as shown in Table 18). Tables 25 and 26 detail the future background plus project volumes for the PM peak hour. These volumes were then used to determine the intersection and link levels of service using the same procedure as previously stated. It should be noted that no adjustment was made to reflect the elimination of existing traffic attributable to the existing on-site development. For the most part, there were only minor changes between the year 2003 future intersection level of service and the year 2003 future background plus project volumes. This is shown in Table 27 and on Figure 10. The intersection level of service analyses are included in Appendix C. The link level of service analysis for future traffic and project traffic conditions was performed on the previously identified roadway links. These results are summarized in Table 28. SubmitIcd ir'�t© thn, public record in connoef;on In/iIil item 2 rl on ! 1 1iWalter Fc:;man city Cler{.c JACKSON M. AHL8TEDT, P.E. THE 1800 CLUB August 22, 2001 {.� Page 35 • • TABLE 26 FUTURE AM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES NTH PROJECT • NOTES: NA - Movement Not Avagable TABLE 26 FUTURE PM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES WITH PROJECT NOTE& MA - Movement Not AvabNe L� 0 0 • • 0 TABLE 27 FUTURE INTERSECTION LOS WITH PROJECT WEEKDAY PEAK HOUR CONDITIONS TABLE 28 FUTURE LINK LEVEL OF SERVICE WITH PROJECT Subvni[i� (:..,; tho public record in cc nnoction with itern evil J ") —I-, C Waiter Footman Gljtaq (rierk JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. THE 1800 CLUi c) r2 August 22, 2001 J. " _�t dr Page 37 • 0 0 i 0 FIGURE 10 FUTURE LEVELS OF SERVICE WITH PROJECT JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. THE 1804 CLUB AUguat 22, 2001 <' y Page 38 NE 20TH STREET DIF NE 19TH STREET *PROJECT NE 18TH STREET FBF NE 17TH TERR C/D a � m w ¢ z o NUi U DC] Z CYa Z F LINK PEAK HOUR LOS G1B AM/PM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION LOS 4•= , .,c:^ public rccUrd with item ILL L4 ".t L e i ion gq U} alter Fooman City Clerk FIGURE 10 FUTURE LEVELS OF SERVICE WITH PROJECT JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. THE 1804 CLUB AUguat 22, 2001 <' y Page 38 0 L 10.0 ON -STREET PARKING There are metered parking spaces on the north side of N.E. Ie Street and the west side of North Bayshore Drive adjacent to the site. The project will not likely result in the elimination of any of these existing on -street parking spaces. The project will construct some 623 onsite parking spaces. Parking will be provide for residents; employees and visitors to the site. 11.0 PEDESTRIANS Pedestrian activity was noted in the immediate vicinity of the site. There are pedestrian provisions in the traffic signals at Biscayne Boulevard and N.E. 17"' Terrace and Biscayne Boulevard and N.E. le Street. The proposed project will improve. pedestrian movements along N.E. 180' Street and maintain movements along Noah Baysh.ore Drive. IS 12.0 PROJECT SITE PLAN • Traffic and transportation aspects of the proposed site plan were reviewed and analyzed. 12.1 PROJECT DRIVEWAYS The proposed project includes a two-way driveway serving the site. Table 29 summarizes the AM and PM peak hour driveway volumes anticipated at the service points. TABLE 29 AM AND PM PEAK HOUR DRIVEWAY VOLUMES IN VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH) ^ubmitted into the public record in c.ceqectian with THE 1$00 CLUB Walter Foornan August 22, 2001 City Clerk 2 1,,"! $ e39 ! 0 Queuing analysis was conducted based upon the assumption that access to the garage will be controlled by a card reader system and consist of an inbound lane an outbound lane and a third reversible lane. Analysis of potential inbound queues for the AM and PM peak hours indicates that there is approximately a 90% probability that the queue should not exceed 1 vehicle in addition to the vehicle being processed. Thus, the inbound queue space appears adequate to preclude disruption to traffic flow on N.E. W, Street. Analysis of potential outbound queues for the AM and PM peak hours indicates that there is approximately a 90% probability that the queue should not exceed 3 vehicles in addition to the vehicle being processed. The outbound queue space appears adequate to preclude disruption to traffic flow in the parking garage. It is proposed that a median opening be constructed on NE 181" Street at the entrancelexit driveway for the proposed project. Because of the lew volume of traffic and the width of the pavement on NE 1 & Street, it would not be necessary to create a turn lane in the median. 12.2 PROJECT LOADING DOCK The proposed site plan includes a loading dock area on the west side of the site. The loading dock area consists of,three 12' by 35' berths plus two 10' by 20' berths. These should be adequate to serve the type and magnitude of development anticipated. The loading docks are accessed via the existing alley on the west side of the site. Loading dock maneuvering will not impact traffic flow or pedestrian movements on NE 1 e Street or North Bayshore Drive. The alley is narrow and in poor condition, Consideration should be given to signing the alley one-way in the southbound direction. There is an existing median opening in NE 181' Street to serve this alley. The existing median opening could be retained. 12.3 PEDESTRIAN ACCESS Currently, the proposed site plan provides pedestrian access to N.E. 1811 Street and North Bayshore Drive via the proposed driveways. This will likely be refined during the design process. 13.0 CONCLUSIONS After reviewing.the results from the intersection analysis and the roadway fink analysis, that with or without the project by the year 2003 there will be some deterioration in the level of service on Biscayne Boulevard. Submittcd Into the publio JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. record in connection with THE 1800 CLUB item P-- � i on y. 1 r August 22, 2001 waiter Foeman Page as City Clerk "..1 42 7 0 0 • The analysis indicates that, due to other future development, there will be a need to improve the southbound left tum movement at the intersection of Biscayne Boulevard an NE 19"' Street. 'These improvements would also benefit the proposed project. The roadway link analysis yields similar level of service results, indicating that roadway levels of service remain relatively consistent through the year 2003 with the project. The results of all of these analyses are shown in Table 30 and the analyses are included in Appendix D. Finally, the corridor analysis provided in Appendix E clearly indicates that there is sufficient transportation system capacity in the Biscayne Boulevard Corridor to accommodate the proposed project.. TABLE 30 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE SUMMARY WEEKDAY PEAK HOUR CONDITIONS Scbn1itIO'd ipso ik r., public record irl connec%on with item EZ=.L on Walter Foeman City Clerk JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. THE 1800 CLUB August 22, 2001 Page 41 J I i is APPENDIX A Existing intersection Levels of Service Submitted into the pubiiC record in connection with iters "i on-tt�o gNlter Fooman Citi+ Clark i .7 18SBBEA.txt 0 i HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY, Analyst: J. AHLSTEDT Agency/Co.: 3 Date Performed: 6/26/2001 Analysis Time Period: AM PEAK HOUR Intersection: 0.80 Jurisdiction: CITY OF MIAMI/FDOT Analysis Year: EXISTING Project ID: 1800 CLUB East/West Street: NE 18TH STREET North/South Street: BISCAYNE 13OULEVARD Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustmrents__-.--__-_.-- Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 13 725 3 34 1832 16 PSak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.65 0.80 0.25 0.69 0.91 0.80 Hourly Flow hate, HFR 20 906 12 44 2013 19 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 3 3 3 -- 3 Median Type TWL'TL Percent Grade (%) 190 0 0.07 0.07 0 RT Channelized? Median Storage 1 0.24 0.21 0.75 0.44 Control. Malay Lanes 1 2 0 Na LOS 1 2 0 No Configuration L T TR L T TR Upstream Signal? RT Channelized? Yes Yes Minor Street: Approach Westbound 0 2 0 Eastbound 0 Movement 7 8 9 ( 10 11 12 TR L T R I L "T' R Volume 6 3 31 4 1 11 Peak hour Factor. PHF 0.50 0.25 0.68 0.50 0.25 0.46 Hourly Flory Rate, HFR 12 12 45 8 4 23 Percent heavy Vehicles 3 3 3 3 3 3 Percent Grade (%) 190 0 0.07 0.07 0 0.13 Median Storage 1 0.24 0.21 0.75 0.44 Control. Malay 19.3 Flared Approach: Exists? 23.1 Na LOS C No C Storage Approach Delay Approach LOS RT Channelized? Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 Configuration LT TR LT TR Submitted Into the public record in connectlon with Page 1 itemP? �I on -11.0 Walter Foeman City Clark. Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 17 a 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config L L I LT TR i LT TR v (vph) 20 49 18 51 10 25 C(m) (vph) 271 733 249 190 v/c 0.07 0.07 0.20 0.13 95% queue Length 0.24 0.21 0.75 0.44 Control. Malay 19.3 10.3 23.1 26.8 LOS C B C D Approach Delay Approach LOS Submitted Into the public record in connectlon with Page 1 itemP? �I on -11.0 Walter Foeman City Clark. 18SBBEP.txt: Relay, Queue Length; and Leval of Service Approach AIH SH Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 I 7 8 9 i 10 11 12 Lane Config L L LT TR { LT TR V (vph) HCS2000: Unsi,gnalizsd Intersections Release 4.1 15 86 TWQ-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY 14 C(m) (vph) 588 433 83 305 82 260 v/c 0.04 Analyst: J. AHLSTEDT 0.18 0.28 0.07 0.05 95% queue length Agency/Co.: 0.38 0.62 1.13 0.23 0.17 Date Performed: 5/26/2001 11.4 14.4 57.7 21.4 52.3 Analysis Time Period: PM PEAK HOUR LOS B B F C Intersection: C Approach Delay Jurisdiction: CITY OF MIAMI/FDOT 29.4 Approach LOS Analysis Year: EXISTING D D Project ID: 1800 CLUB EastMest Street: ATE 18Th STREET North/South Street: BISCAYNE BOULEVARD Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments _ Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 14 1410 10 36 1053 10 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.58 0.94 0.83 0.73 0.91 0.'83 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 24 1500 12 49 1157 12 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 -» w- 3 -- - Median Types IVLTL RT Channelized? Lanes 1 2 0 1 2 0 Configuration L T TR L T TR Upstream Signal? Yes Yes Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 { 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 5 2 66 2 1 7 Peak Hour Factor. PHF 0.42 0.25 0,80 0.50 0.25 0.58 Hourly Flaw Rate. HFR 11 8 62 4 4 12 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 3 3 3 3 3 Percent Grader (Y.) 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? No No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 Configuration LT TR LT TR Relay, Queue Length; and Leval of Service Approach AIH SH Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 I 7 8 9 i 10 11 12 Lane Config L L LT TR { LT TR V (vph) 24 4.9 15 86 6 14 C(m) (vph) 588 433 83 305 82 260 v/c 0.04 0.11 0.18 0.28 0.07 0.05 95% queue length 0.13 0.38 0.62 1.13 0.23 0.17 Control Delay 11.4 14.4 57.7 21.4 52.3 19.6 LOS B B F C F C Approach Delay 25.8 29.4 Approach LOS D D Page 1 Submitted into the public recorq_ in connection with itEArn __: z -L on y aitcsr Fooman i 1c'ri< ,J4 1 195BBEA.txt HCS2000: Signalized late reactions Release 4.1 Analyst: J. AMSTEDT Inter.: 2390 Agency: Area Type: All other areas Date: 6/27/2001 Jurisd: CITY OF MIAMI/F'DOT Period: AM PEAK HOUR Year : EXISTING Project ID, 1800 CLUB EM St: NE 19TH STREET N/S St: BISCAYNE BOULEVARD SIGUALIZED INTERSECTION SUMI4ARY 1 Eastbound I Weetbound I Northbound L T R I L T R I L T R No. Lanes 1 0 1 1 1 0 f 1 f _. 1 2 0 LGConf ig I LT R I LT R i L TR Volume 122 7 32 13 15 79 122 734 2 Lane Width 1 11.0 11.0 1 11.0 11.0 111.0 11.4 RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 Southbound L T R 1 2 0 1. TR 34 1832 16 11.0 11.0 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas _ _Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 6 EH Left A 1 NB Left P Thru A 1 Thru P Right A i Right P Pads 1 Peds WB Left A I SB Left P Thru A 1 Thru P Right A 1 Right P Peds 1 Peas NB Right I EB Right SH Right 1 WB Right Green 26.0 56.0 Yellow 4.0 4,0 All Red 0.0 0.0 Cycle Length: 90.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Croup Approach Lane Group Flow Rate -- Grp Capacity (s) V/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound LT 449 1555 0.12 0.29 23.7 C 23.7 C R 438 151.6 0.12 0.29 23.7 C Weetbound LT 499 1726 0.09 0.29 23.4 C 24.2 C R 438 1516 0.23 0.29 24.6 C Northbound L 80 127 0.41 0.62 23.6 C TR 2107 3386 0.40 0.62 9.1 A 9.6 A Southbound L 327 525 0.17 0.62 8.3 A TR 2104 3382 0.96 0.62 27.9 C 27.4 C Intersection Delay - 22.3 (sec/Veh) Intersection LOS C Submitted Into the public page 1 record in Connection with item mt on i l 2 Waiter Foornan City Clerk 195BBEP. txt 0 i HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Analyst: J. AHLSTEDT Inter.: 2390 Agency: Area Typo: All other areas Date: 6/27/2001 Jurisd: CITY OF MIAMI/FDOT Period: Phi PEAK HOUR Year : EXISTING Project ID: 1800 CLUB EM St: RE 19'YYi STREET NIS St: BISCAYNE BOULEVARD SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY- Eastbound UMMARY..Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound 1 I L T R I L T R j L T R I L T R I No. Lanes 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 ; 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 LGConfig I LT R I LT R I L TR I L TR 1 Volume 155 13 53 15 23 154 139 1700 2 145 1054 31 1 Lana Width 1 11.0 11.0 1 11.0 11.0 111.0 11.0 111.0 11.0 1 RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 l Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas _ Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A I NB Left P Thru A 1 Thru P Right A 1 Right P Pods 1 Peds WB Loft A I 88 Left P Thru A J Thru P Right A 1 Right P Peds 1 Peds NB Right 1 EB Right SB Right I WB Right Careen 26.0 81.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 All Red 0.0 0.0 Cycle Length: 115.0 secs Intersection P+erfox1mdnea Summary-- Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rata Grp Capacity (s) V/a g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound LT 308 1361 0.31 0.23 37.6 D 37.0 D R 343 1516 0.16 0.2� 36.2 D Westbound LT 375 1658 0.11 0,23 35.4 D 39.2 D R 343 1516 0.50 0.23 40.1 D Northbound L 244 347 0.18 0.70 7.4 A TR 2386 3367 0.85 0.70 16.6 8 16.4 B Southbound L 63 08 0.98 0.70 125.4 F TR 2375 3372 0.50 0.70 8.6 A 14.3 B Intersection Delay - 17.9 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS m 8 Submitted Into the public record in connection with Page 1 item z- ) on AL--Z-PJ r lter Foeman Et 2 7 City Cleric TGNALTZED INTERSECTIONS - { Eastbound I Westbound { Northbound I Southbound 1 I L T R I L T R I L T R I L. T R I --- I I No. Lanes 1 0 1 1 0 ] 1{ 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 LGConfig I LT R { IT R I L TR 1 L TR I Volume 15 5 48 129 9 99 130 622 41 1153 1603 21 1 Lana Width 1 13..0 11.0 1 11.0 11.0 111.0 11.0 111.0 11.0 0 l RTOR Vol, I a I 0 1 0 1 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 S 6 7 8 EB Left A 1 NB Left P Thru A 1 Thru P Right A j Right P Peds j Peds WB Left A 1 88 Left A P Thru A I Thru A P Right A I Right A P Peds l Peds N5 Right ( ES Right S5 Right I WB Right Green 19.0 18.0 65.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 4.0 All Red 0.0 1.0 0.0 Cycle Length: 115.0 seas Intersection Performances Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (a) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound LT 263 1592 0.09 0.17 40.8 D 42.6 D R 250 1516 0.32 0.17 43.1 D Westbound LT 244 1474 0.20 0.17 41.9 D 44.6 D R 250 1516 0.52 0.17 45.7 D Northbound L 142 251 0.32 0.57 19.0 B TR 1694 3351 0.38 0.57 14.4 B 14.7 B Southbound L 596 1694 0.31 0.77 4.9 A TR 2585 3378 0.66 0.77 7.0 A 6.8 A Intersection Delay - 12.4 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS B Submitted into the public record in connection with Page 1 item -nt. ori --JV tfij,ra r Focrtan �. 12 i 2 c u.b")t, s. 17TBBEA.txt MCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Analyst: J. AHLSTEDT Inter.: Area Type: 4136 All other areas Agency; Date: 6/28/2001 Jurisd: CITY OF MIAMI/FDOT Period: AM PEAK HOUR Year : EXISTING Project ID: 1600 CLUB E/W St: NE 17TH TERRACE NIS St: BISCAYNE BOULEVARD TGNALTZED INTERSECTIONS - { Eastbound I Westbound { Northbound I Southbound 1 I L T R I L T R I L T R I L. T R I --- I I No. Lanes 1 0 1 1 0 ] 1{ 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 LGConfig I LT R { IT R I L TR 1 L TR I Volume 15 5 48 129 9 99 130 622 41 1153 1603 21 1 Lana Width 1 13..0 11.0 1 11.0 11.0 111.0 11.0 111.0 11.0 0 l RTOR Vol, I a I 0 1 0 1 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 S 6 7 8 EB Left A 1 NB Left P Thru A 1 Thru P Right A j Right P Peds j Peds WB Left A 1 88 Left A P Thru A I Thru A P Right A I Right A P Peds l Peds N5 Right ( ES Right S5 Right I WB Right Green 19.0 18.0 65.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 4.0 All Red 0.0 1.0 0.0 Cycle Length: 115.0 seas Intersection Performances Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (a) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound LT 263 1592 0.09 0.17 40.8 D 42.6 D R 250 1516 0.32 0.17 43.1 D Westbound LT 244 1474 0.20 0.17 41.9 D 44.6 D R 250 1516 0.52 0.17 45.7 D Northbound L 142 251 0.32 0.57 19.0 B TR 1694 3351 0.38 0.57 14.4 B 14.7 B Southbound L 596 1694 0.31 0.77 4.9 A TR 2585 3378 0.66 0.77 7.0 A 6.8 A Intersection Delay - 12.4 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS B Submitted into the public record in connection with Page 1 item -nt. ori --JV tfij,ra r Focrtan �. 12 i 2 c u.b")t, s. Southbound L 330 1694 0.57 0.77 31.4 C TR 2586 3379 0.36 0.77 4.5 A 9.0 A Intersection Delay - 21.1 (sea/vsh) Intersection LOS - C • Subn- ittod ieato thv public record irl Gonnoction with itemP-9 l on Page 1 Walter Foeman City Clork 17TBBEP.txt � i HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Analyst: J. AHLSTEDT Inter.: 4136 Agency: Area Type: All other areas Date: 6/28/2001 Juri.sd: CITY OF MIAMI/FDOT Period: PM PEAK HOUR Year : EXISTIN0 Project ID: 1800 CLUB E/W St: NE 17TH TERRACE N/S St: BISCAYNE BOULEVARD INTERSECTION SUMt«iARY --_SIGNALIZED Eastbound I Westbound j Rorthbound I Southbound 1 L T R 1 L T R I L T R I L T R No. Lanes IY 0 0 1 1 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 1 1 LGCon£ig I LT R I IT R I L TR I L Tit I Volume 18 12 24 137 13 121 110 1371 56 1151 863 9 I Lane Width 1 11.0 11.0 1 11.0 11.0 111.0 11.0 111.0 11.0 1 RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 I Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 9 EB heft A 1 NS Left P Thru A { Thru P Right A I Right P Peds 1 Peds WS Left A I SS Left A P Thru A I Thru A P Right A 1 {tight A P Verde Peds ND Right i ED Right SB Right 1 WB Right Careen 19.0 18.0 65.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 4.0 All Red 0.0 1.0 0.0 Cycle Length: 115.0 Boos Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Large Group Flow Rate .. Grp Capacity (s) V/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound LT 267 1618 0.12 0.17 41.1 0 41.1 D R 250 1516 0,12 0.17 41.1 D Westbound LT 236 1428 0.35 0.17 43.4 D 46.6 D R 250 1516 0.60 0.17 46.3 D Northbound L 309 546 0.06 0.57 11.7 8 TR 1902 3365 0.84 0.57 25.3 C 25.1 C Southbound L 330 1694 0.57 0.77 31.4 C TR 2586 3379 0.36 0.77 4.5 A 9.0 A Intersection Delay - 21.1 (sea/vsh) Intersection LOS - C • Subn- ittod ieato thv public record irl Gonnoction with itemP-9 l on Page 1 Walter Foeman City Clork 0 0 0 0 APPENDIX B Future Intersection Levels of Service Without Project Submi►tod into tl7e public record in con'1000 with Item z!- On V+?itcr a oornan • 18SBBFA.txt 0 0 HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and ]WO -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMt4ARY Analyst: J. AHLS'TEDT Agekncy/Co . : 10 Date Performed: 8/22/2001 Analysis Time Period: AM PEAK HOUR Intersection: Movement Jurisdiction: CITY OF MIAMI/FDOT Analysis Year: Fun= W/o PROJECT Project ID: 1800 CLUB EastNest Street: NE 18TH STREET North/South Street: BISCAYNE BOULEVARD Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments 50 18 Major Street: Approach 10 Northbound C(m) (vph) 219 0.10 Southbound 54 0.33 Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 1.07 L T R I L T R Volume 14 802 3 35 2045 17 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.65 0.60 0,25 0.69 0.91 0.80 Hourly Flaw Rate, HFR 21 1002 12 s0 2247 21 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 __ __ 3-_ Median Type 'TWLTL RT Channelized? 1 2 0 Lanes Configuration 1 2 0 L T TR L T TR Upstream Signal? Yes Yes Manor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R 1 L T R Volume & 3 32 4 1 11 Peale Hour Factor, PHF 0.50 0.25 0.68 0.50 0.25 0.46 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 12 12 47 8 4 23 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 3 3 3 3 3 Percent Grade (i) 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? No No Storage RT Channelized? 0 2 0 Lanes Configuration 0 2 0 LT TR LT TR _Delay. Approach NB Movement 1 Lane Config L Queue Length, and Level SB Westbound 4 1 7 8 L l LT of Service Eastbound 9 1 10 11 12 TR LT TR v (vph) 21 50 18 53 10 25 1.55 C(m) (vph) 219 0.10 674 0.07 54 0.33 193 0.27 30 0.33 0.16 v/c 95% queue length 0.31 0.24 1.19 1.07 1.05 0.56 32.6 Control Delay 23.2 10.8 101.9 30.6 176.2 LOS C B F D F Approach Delay 48.7 73.7 F Approach LOS >r Submitted into '-" pubiiC Page 1 record rt c()nnn ,'ction with Korn iter F'i anon • • IGSBBFP.txt r HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 Intersection Orientation: NS Study }period (hre): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustment 6 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL 5U6II�lARY Analyst: J. AHLSTEDT Agency/Co.. Approach Date Performed: Analysis Time Period: 8/22/2001 PM PEAK HOUR Intersection: Jurisdiction: CITY OF MIAMI/I'DOT Analysis Year: Fi3xiJRE w/o PROJECT Project ID: 1800 CLUB East/ est Street: NE 18TH STREET North/South Street: BISCAYNE BOULEVARD Intersection Orientation: NS Study }period (hre): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustment 6 Delay, Queue Length., and Leval Major Street: Approach Northbound Approach NB Southbound 5 �' Movement 1 2 T S 14 R i L x R L LT TR Lane Config Vol0 PHF 15 1607 0.58 0.94 10 0.83 37 1143 0.73 0.91 10 0:83 Peak -Hour Factor, Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 25 1709 12 s0 1255 12 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 -- 0.05 0.14 0.24 0.35 Median Type TWLTL 0.07 0.21 v/c 95% queue length 0.15 0.48 16.6 0.82 79.2 RT Channalized?1 2 O 23 3 Control Delay 1 2 0 Lanus L T TO C L T TR B Configuration Yap 37.0 yes Approach Delay Upstream Signal? D E ;,no; Street: Approach Westbound 10 Eastbound 11 12 Movement 7 8 T 9 R 1 L T R L Volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF 5 2 0.42 0.25 69 0.50 2 1 0.50 0.25 7 OZ58 Hourly Flag Rata, HFR 11 6 66 3 3 3 3 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 3 a Percent Tirade (%) 0 Median Storage 1 Na No Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration z a LT TR 2 0 LT TR Submitted into the public Page 1 record n connection with item.2� ! On Walter Foorman Gley Clerk Delay, Queue Length., and Leval of Service Eastbound Approach NB SB Westbound 7 B 9 10 11 12 Movement 1 L t i LT TR Lane Config v (vph) 25 538 50 359 15 63 90 258 6 52 14 211 21 C(m) (uph) 0.05 0.14 0.24 0.35 0.10 0.07 0.21 v/c 95% queue length 0.15 0.48 16.6 0.82 79.2 1.50 26.2 0.31 69.2 23 3 Control Delay 12.0 F C LOS B C 33.3 37.0 Approach Delay D E Approach LOS Submitted into the public Page 1 record n connection with item.2� ! On Walter Foorman Gley Clerk RCS2000: Signalized Intersections Reileasa 4.1 Analyst: J. AHLSi'EDT Inter.: 2390 Agency: Area Type: A11 other areas Jurisd: CITY OF MIAMI/FDOT Date- 8/22/2001 Period: AM WEAK HOUR Year : FUTURE W/0 PROJECT project ID: 1800 CLUB NIS St: BISCAYNZ BOULEVARD E/W St: NE 19TH STREET SIGNALIZED IMERSECTION SUM", Srsuthboundd j Eastbound 1 Westbound I Northbound L T j L T R 1 L T R I L I No. Lanes I 0 LT R L TR L TR LT R E LGConfig I 0 I I I Volume 123 11 33 11.0 11.D 1134 4 1190 111.0 1120 41 `11.0 131.0 01 1 Lane Width I D 1 D 1 0 I RTOR Vol I Duration fl.25 Area Type: All other areas ignal Operations 5 6 7 8 Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 EH Left A j NS Left P Thru A i Thru P Right A 1 Right P Leda Peds j WB Left A 1 SH Left F Thru A I 'Thru P Right A I Right P Peds j Peds NB Right l EH Right SB Right i WH Right 26.q 56.0 Careen 4.0 Yellow 4.0 0.0 All .Red 0.0 Cycle Length: 90.0 seta Intersection performance Summaxy Appr/ Lana: Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate(e) v/ - a g/C: Delay LAS Delay LDS Grp Capacity Eastlaound IT 297 1029 0.23 0.29 24.8 C 24.3 C R 438 1516 0.13 0.29 23.7 C Westbound LT 347 1202 1.18 0.29 139.4 F 93.5 F R 438 1516 0.74 0.29 35.5 D Northbound 0.44 0.62 25.3 C L 8a 127 TR 2061 3345 0.46 0.62 9.7 A 10.3 B Southbound L 276 444 1.14 0.62 114.8 F TR 2098 3372 1.00 0.62 35.8 D 46.1 D Intersection Delay a 45.3 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS D Submitted into the public ith Page 1 rccMd in ce ncctic w on itemlter i ��� 195BBFP.txt 0 i HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Analyst: J. AHLSTEDT Inter.: 2390 Agency: Area Type: All other areas Date: 8/22/2001 Jurisd: CITY OF MIAMI/FDOT Period: PM PEAR HOUR Year : FUTURE W/O PROJECT Project ID: 1800 CLUB E/w St: ATE 19TH STREET N/S St: BI SCAYNE BOULEVARD 510HALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Wastboand I Northbound I Southbound L T R i L T R I L T R 1 L T R No. Lanes 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 2 0 j 1 2 0 LGConfig I LT R i LT R 1 L TR I L TR Volume 157 22 55 144 28 295 141 1778 133 1259 1105 32 Lane Width 1 11.0 11.0 1 11.0 101.0 111.0 11.0 0 111.0 11.0 0 RTOR vol 1 0 1 Duration 0.25 Area Type; All other areas igta 1 Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A I STB Left P Thru A I Thru P Right A I Right P Pods 1 beds WB Left A I SB Left P Thru A I Thru P Right A I Right P Peds I Pads NS Right 1 EB Right SB Right 1 WB Right Careen 26.0 61.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 All Red 0.0 0.0 Cycle Length: 115.0 sees Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate-----�- -• Grp Capacity (e) V/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound LT 226 1001 0.49 0.23 40.4 D 38.9 D R 343 1516 0.19 0.23 36.3 D Westbound LT 223 987 0.63 0.23 45.7 D 72.1 E R 343 1516 0.97 0.23 83.3 F Northbound L 225 320 0.21 0.70 8.1 A TR 2346 3331 1.02 0.70 39.6 D 39.0 D Southbound L 63 Be 5.63 0.70 F TR 2375 3372 0.53 0.70 8.8 A 478.7 F Intersection Delay � 193.2 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS - F Submitted into the public record in connection it r Page 1 item Z- cin �,.�--- Walter Fooman ,,-I€irk 17TBBFA.txt • HCS2000: Signalized Interserctions Release 4.1 . Analyst: J. AHLSTEDT Inter.: 4136 Agency: Area Type: All other areas Data: 6/22/2001 Jurisd: CITY OF MIAMI/FDOT Period` AM PEAK HOUR Year : FUTURE W/0 PROJECT Project ID: 1800 CLUB E/W St: NE 1TIH TERRACE N/S St: BISCAYNE BOULEVARD Submitted into the public record in connection ith Page 1 item z -- on L �C/ !Falter Foeman �'' � 2 Citi Clerk SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Northbound � 1 LEastboundR LWestboundR l LSouthboundd No. Lanes 1.. 0 1 1 1 0 1 LT 1 R 1 �_. 1 1 2 0 L TR 1 1 2 0 I 1 L TR I LGConfig I 15 LT R 1 5 50 1151 9 103 131 695 132 1159 1807 22 1 Volume Lane Width 1 11.0 1 11.0 01.0 111.0 11.0 111.0 11.0 0 1 RTOR Vol I 01,.0 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 1 NB 5 Left 6 7 8 P EB Left A A 1 Thru P Thru !:tight A � Right P Peds A 1 SB Pods Left A P WE Left Thru A i Thru A P Right A � Right A P Peds ti. Peds NB Right I EB Right SB Right } WE Right 18.0 65.0 Green Yellow 19.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All Red 0.0 1.0 Cycle 0.0 Length: 115.0 secs Intersection Performance Ratios Summary Lane Group Approach Appy/ Lane Adj Sat Lane t�roap Carp Capacity Flows Rata (sj v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay F.OS Eastbound IT 203 1229 0.12 0.17 41.1 D 42.6 D R 250 1516 0.34 0.17 43.3 D Westbound LT 214 1296 0.86 0.17 78.2 E 64.9 E R 250 1516 0.54 0.17 46.2 D Northbound L 101 179 0.47 0.57 29.4 C TR 1861 3299 0.49 0.57 16.0 B 15.7 B Southbound L 51,4 1694 0.37 0.77 6.3 A TR 2586 3379 0.74 0.77 8.5 A 8.3 A Intersection Delay - 16.9 (see/vah) Intersection LOS B Submitted into the public record in connection ith Page 1 item z -- on L �C/ !Falter Foeman �'' � 2 Citi Clerk 17TBBFP.txt • CJ HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Analyst. J. AHLSTEDT Inter.: 4196 Agency: Area Type: All other areas Date: 0/22/2001 Juried: CITY OF MIAMI/FDOT Period: PM PEAK HOUR Year : FUTURE WIO PROJECT Project ID., 1800 CLUB EAST St: NE 17TH TERRACE NIS St: BISCAYNE BOULEVARD SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R 1 No. Lanes 1 0 1 1 1- 0 1 11 -- �--- 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 LGCon£ig I LT R I IT R I L TR I L TR I Volume 18 12 25 1162 14 126 110 2566 123 1157 945 9 1 Lane Width 1 11.0 11.0 1 11.0 11.0 111.0 11.0 111.0 11.0 0 i RTOR Vol .1 0 1 0 1 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 H EB Left A 1 N8 Left P Thru A 1 Thru P Right A I Right P Peds I Peds WH Left A I SS Left A P Thru A 1 Thru A P Right A i Right A P Peds I Pods NB Right I' EB Right SB Right 1 WB Right Green 19.0 18.0 65.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 4.0 All Red 0.0 1.0 0.0 Cycle Length: 115.0 secs Intersection performance Summary. Appr/ Lanza Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lana ' Group Flow Rate - Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound LT 170 1026 0.19 0.17 41.9 D 41.5 D R 250 1516 0.12 0.17 41.1 D Westbound LT 212 1286 1.25 0.17 193.4 F 140.0 F R 250 1516 0.62 0.17 49.5 D Northbound L 283 500 0.07 0.57 11.8 H TR 1891 3346 1.00 0.57 46.3 D 46.0 D Southbound L 328 1694 0.60 0.77 36.2 D TR 2566 3380 0.39 0.77 4.6 A 9.7 A Intersection Delay . 44.6 (sec/vsh) Intersection LOS D Subrnii cd into the publlC record in c0oneotion with Page 1 item2-1 On Walter Foernan City Clerk i C] • 0 APPENDIX C Future Intersection Levels of Service With Project Submitted Into the public record in connection with Item 'z!1 on at Vfniter Foeman �, city %led • 0 18SBBPA.txt • • fiCS2000: Unsignalizsd intersections Release 4.1 'IWO--WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: J. AHI.ST DT Agency/Ca . : Major Street: Approach Date Performed: 8/22/2001 Analysis Time Period: AM PEAK HOUR Intersection: Jurisdiction: CITY OF MIAMI/FDOT Analysis Year: FUTURE W/PROJECT Project ID: 1800 CLUB East/West Street: NE 18TH STREET North/South Street: BISCAYNE BOULEVARD Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle volumes and Adjustments 21 219 82 575 Major Street: Approach 158 276 Northbound 25 145 v/c 95% queue length Southbound 0.14 0.50 Movement 0.57 3.29 0.42 1.25 0.17 0.60 4 23.2 6 392.9 L T R i L T R Volume Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 14 802 0.65 0.80 48 0.25 57 2045 0.69 0.91 17 0.80 Hourly Flaw Rate. HFR 21 1002 192 82 2243 21 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 -- ~~ 3 Submitted into the; public Median Type TWLTL recar Ire connection with RT Channelized? Page 1 1 2 0 Lanes Configuration 1 2 0 L T TR L T TR Upstream Signal? Yes Yes Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 B 9 1Q 11 12 L T R ( L T R Volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF 39 3 0.50 0.25 104 0.68 4 0.50 1 0.25 11 0.46 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 78 12 152 8 4 23 3 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 3 3 3 Q Percent Grade {�) p Median Storage 1 No Flared Approach: Exists? No Storage RT Channelized? 0 2 Q Lanes Configuration 0 2 0 LT TR LT TR Delay, Approach NB Movement I Lane Config L Queue Length. and Level SB Westbound 4 7 8 L I IT of Service Eastbound 9 { 10 li 12 TR LT TR V (vph) C(m) (vph) 21 219 82 575 84 56 158 276 10 24 25 145 v/c 95% queue length Q.10 0.31 0.14 0.50 1.45 7.47 0.57 3.29 0.42 1.25 0.17 0.60 Control Delay 23.2 12.3 392.9 38.2 236.7 38.9 LOS Approach Delay C B F 158.7 92.6 Approach LOS F F Submitted into the; public recar Ire connection with Page 1 itc�t2=� on,f jcmian aa Ll 18SHBPP.txt • H02aDD: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: J. AHLSTEDT Agency/Co.: Date Performed:. 8/22/2001 Analysis Time Period: PM PEAK HOUR Intersection: Jurisdiction: CITY OF MIAMI/FDOT Analysis Year: FUND W/PROJECT project ID: 1800 CLUB East/West Street: NE 1BTH STREET North/South Street; BISCAYNE BOULEVARD intersection Orientation: HS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street' Approach Northbound 4 Southbound 6 Movement 1 2 3 L T L T R R E Volume 15 1607 109 61 1143 10 Pear -Hour Factor, PHE 0.5B 0.94 0.B3 0.73 0.91 0:83 Hourly Flow Rate. HFR 25 1709 131 33 1256 12 -- Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 - __ Median Type Ti*LTL RT Channelized? 1 2 0 1 2 0 Lanes Configuration L T TR L T TR Upstream Signal? Yes Yes Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement L a 9R 1 La T1 R2 volume 34 2 134 2 1 7 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.42 0.25 0.60 0.50 0.25 0.58 Hourly Flow Rate. HFR 60 6 167 4 4 12 Percent Heavy vehicles 3 3 3 3 3 3 Percent (trade ("/.) 0 a Median Storage 1 No Flared Approach: Exists? No Storage RT Channelized? 0 2 0 0 2 iJ Lanes Configuration LT TR LT TR Delay. Queue Length, and Level of ServiceEastbound Approach NB SB Wootbound 10 11 12 Lane L L LT E TR i LT TR Lane ConFig ( 25 63 84 171 6 14 v uPh) ( 538 323 54 250 16 121 v/c 0.05 0.26 1.56 a.68 0.38 0.36 95'/. queue length 0.15 1.00 7.79 4.47 1.00 Control Delay 12.0 20.0 446.2 45.7 369.7 38.6 LOS B C F 125.9 Approach Delay 177.& F Approach LOS F Suijmitt d into th(3 public Page 1 rcc;c�rd in �e►�ncotion ltp/ item Waiter Foonian City b clerk 1.9SBB'PA. txt 0 HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Analyst: J. ARLSTEDT Inter.: 2390 Agency: Area Type: All other areas Date: 8/22/2001 Jurisd: CITY OF MIAMI/FDOT Period:.AM PEAK HOUR Year : FUTURE W/PROJECT Project ID: 1800 CLUB E/W St: NE 1M STREET NIS St: HYSCAYAIE BOULEVARD SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound I Wastbound I Northbound I Southbound 1 L T R I L T R 1 L T R 1 L T R I No. Lanus 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 2 0 1 2 0 j LGConfig I LT R 1 LT R I L TR I L TR I Volume 123 11 33 1134 24 259 123 644 41 1209 1886 41 1 Lane Width 1 11.0 101.0 ` 11.0 011.0 111.0 11.0 0 111.0 11.0 0 1 RTOR Vol 1 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A I NB Left P Thru A I Thru P Right A 1 Right P Pods Pods WH Left A { SB Left P Thru A I Thru P Right A 1 Right P Peds 1 Peds NB Right ( ES Right SH Right { WB Right Green 26.0 66.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 All Red 0.0 0.0 Cycle Length: 90.0 secs Intersaction Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flog Rate �v/____ ��C Delay LOS Delay y LOS Grp Capacity (s) B Eastbound LT 297 1029 0.23 0.29 24.8 C 24.3 C R 438 1516 0.13 0.29 23.7 C Westbound LT 347 1202 1.18 0.29 139.4 F 33.5 F R 438 1516 0.74 0.29 35.5 D Northbound L 80 127 0.44 0.62 25.3 C TR 2083 3346 0.50 0.62 10.2 B 10.7 B Southbound L 246 395 1.37 0.62 207.2 F TR 2098 3372 1.01 0.62 38.6 D 61.8 E Intersection Delay .. 53.5 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS - D Submitted into the public record in gonnectlan with Page 1 item 22 on Walter Fooman j r � City' Clnrk • 1-1 198PSPP.txt 0 0 No. Lanes LOCon£ig volume Lane Width RTOR Vol _SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMi+1ARY Eastbound { Westbound ! Northbound I Southbound I L T R 1 L T. R j L T R I L T R I 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 2...g..-{ 1 2 0 { LT R I LT R I L TR I L TR ! I57 22 55 144 28 295 141 1843 133 1307 1129 32 1 11.0 11.0 1 11.0 11.0 111.0 11.D 111.0 11.0 0 I Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A 1 NB Left P Thru A I Thru P Right A j Right P Peds i Peds WB Left A I SB Left P Thru A ! Thru P Right A ! Right P Pods ! Peds NB Ri,.ght { EB Right S}3 Right 1 WB Right /been 26.0 81.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 All Rad 0.0 0.0 Cycle Length: 115.0 sacs Intersection performance Summary Ap,pr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Fane Group Plow Rate Grp Capacity (a) v/c O/C Delay LOS Delay IAS Eastbound LT 226 1001 HCS2000: Sigpalixed Intersections Release 4.1 Analyst: J. AHLSTEDT Inter.: 2390 Agency: 0.23 36.3 Area Type: All other areas Date: 8/22/2001 Jurisd: CITY OF MIAMI/FDOT Period: PM PEAK HOUR Year : FUTURE W/PROJECT Project ID: 1800 CLUB 45.7 E/W St: WE 19TH STREET M/S St: BISCAYNE BOULEVARD No. Lanes LOCon£ig volume Lane Width RTOR Vol _SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMi+1ARY Eastbound { Westbound ! Northbound I Southbound I L T R 1 L T. R j L T R I L T R I 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 2...g..-{ 1 2 0 { LT R I LT R I L TR I L TR ! I57 22 55 144 28 295 141 1843 133 1307 1129 32 1 11.0 11.0 1 11.0 11.0 111.0 11.D 111.0 11.0 0 I Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A 1 NB Left P Thru A I Thru P Right A j Right P Peds i Peds WB Left A I SB Left P Thru A ! Thru P Right A ! Right P Pods ! Peds NB Ri,.ght { EB Right S}3 Right 1 WB Right /been 26.0 81.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 All Rad 0.0 0.0 Cycle Length: 115.0 sacs Intersection performance Summary Ap,pr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Fane Group Plow Rate Grp Capacity (a) v/c O/C Delay LOS Delay IAS Eastbound LT 226 1001 0.49 0.23 40.4 D 38.9 D R 343 1516 0.19 0.23 36.3 D Westbound LT 223 987 0.63 0.23 45.7 D 72.1 E R 343 1516 0.97 0.23 83.3 E Northbound L 217 30B 0.22 0.70 8.3 A TR 2348 3333 1.05 0.70 49.6 D 48,8 D Southbound L 63 68 6.68 0.70 F TR 2376 3373 0.54 0.70 9.0 A 652.1 F Intersection Delay - 262.0 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS - F Submitted Into the public -P rocord In connection with ir.crrt -. r cn �. 2_ Page SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY 1 Eastbound 1 Westbound I Northbound 1 Southbound 1 L T R I L T R I L T R 1 L T R 1 140. Lanes 1 0 1 1 l 0 ...1..... 1 _ 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 Laconfig 1 LT R I LT R I L TR 1 L TR 1 Volume 15 5 50 1217 9 103 131 740 132 1159 1840 22 1 Laney width I 11.0 11.0 1 11.0 11.0 111.0 11.00 111.0 11.0 0 RTOR Vol { 0 l 0 I Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas ignal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A 1 NB Left P Thru A I Thru P Right A Flight P Pods I Pads WB Left A 1 SE Left A P Thru A I Thru A P Right A 1 Right A P Peds 1 Peds NB Right I EB Right SB Right I WB Right Green 19.0 18.0 65.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 4.0 All Reid 0.0 1.0 0.0 Cycle Length: 115.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lana Group Plow Rate Grp Capacity (s) V/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound LT 166 1006 0.14 0.1.7 41.5 D 42.9 D R 250 1516 0.34 0.17 43.3 D Westbound LT 213 1287 1.23 0.17 187.3 F 139.7 F R 250 1516 0.54 0.17 46.2 D Northbound L 95 168 0.49 0.57 32.3 C TR 1664 3298 0.52 0.57 16.4 B 17.2 B Southbound L 496 1694 0.39 0,77 6.7 A TR 2586 3379 0.75 0.77 8.8 A 8.6 A Intersection Delay - 26.2 (sec/V$h) Intersection LOS C t;ubr;�lttod into the publl(; recordcs nooc'Non ith Page 1 Item1 oncity cloric -I�/roi r� 17TBBPA. txt; • . RCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Analyst: J. AHL STEDT Inter.: 4136 Agency, Area Type: All other areas Date: 6/22/2001 Jurisd: CITY OF MIAMI/EDOT Period: AM PEAR HOUR Year : FUTURE W/PROJECT Project ID: 1800 CLUB E/W St: NE 17TH TERRACE NIS St: BISCAYNE BOULEVARD SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY 1 Eastbound 1 Westbound I Northbound 1 Southbound 1 L T R I L T R I L T R 1 L T R 1 140. Lanes 1 0 1 1 l 0 ...1..... 1 _ 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 Laconfig 1 LT R I LT R I L TR 1 L TR 1 Volume 15 5 50 1217 9 103 131 740 132 1159 1840 22 1 Laney width I 11.0 11.0 1 11.0 11.0 111.0 11.00 111.0 11.0 0 RTOR Vol { 0 l 0 I Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas ignal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A 1 NB Left P Thru A I Thru P Right A Flight P Pods I Pads WB Left A 1 SE Left A P Thru A I Thru A P Right A 1 Right A P Peds 1 Peds NB Right I EB Right SB Right I WB Right Green 19.0 18.0 65.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 4.0 All Reid 0.0 1.0 0.0 Cycle Length: 115.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lana Group Plow Rate Grp Capacity (s) V/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound LT 166 1006 0.14 0.1.7 41.5 D 42.9 D R 250 1516 0.34 0.17 43.3 D Westbound LT 213 1287 1.23 0.17 187.3 F 139.7 F R 250 1516 0.54 0.17 46.2 D Northbound L 95 168 0.49 0.57 32.3 C TR 1664 3298 0.52 0.57 16.4 B 17.2 B Southbound L 496 1694 0.39 0,77 6.7 A TR 2586 3379 0.75 0.77 8.8 A 8.6 A Intersection Delay - 26.2 (sec/V$h) Intersection LOS C t;ubr;�lttod into the publl(; recordcs nooc'Non ith Page 1 Item1 oncity cloric -I�/roi r� 17TBBPP.txt • HC32000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Analyst: J. AHL.STEDT Inter.: 4136 Agency: Area Type: All other areas Date: 8/22/2001 Jurisd: CITY OF MIAMI/FDOT Period: PM PEAK HOUR Year : FUTURE W/PROJECT Project ID: 1800 CLUB E/W St: NE 17TH TERRACE NIS St: BISCAYNE BOULEVARD _SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIO14 SiJMARY I�Eastbound { Wastbound { Northbound I Southbound I I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I No. Lanes j 0 1 1 0 1 1 ( 1 2 0 j 1 2 0 -1 LGconfig I LT R 1 LT R 1 L TR L TR 1 Volume 18 12 25 1220 14 126 110 1665 123 1157 1.032 9 1 Lane Width 1 11.0 11.0 { 11.0 11.0 111.0 11.0 111.0 11.0 0 I RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 { Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EH Luft A I NH Left P Thru A i Thru P Right A I Right P Pads i Peds WB Left A { SB Left A P Thru A { Thru A P Right A 1 Right A P Pads 1 Peds Na Right I EB Right SB Right I WE Right Green 19.0 18.0 65.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 4.0 0 All Red 0.0 1.0 0.0 Cycle Length: 115.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane {Group Flow Rate Grp .Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound LT 167 1013 0.19 0.17 41.9 D 41.5 D R 250 1516 0.12 0.17 41.1 D Westbound IT 211 1276 1.65 0.17 362.5 F 265.8 F R 250 1516 0.62 0.17 49.5 D Northbound L 258 456 0.08 0.57 12.0 B TR 1893 3349 1.06 0.57 63.6 E 63.1 E Southbound L 328 1694 0.60 0.77 36.8 D TR 2587 3381 0.43 0.77 4.8 A 9.6 A Intersection Delay .. 71.0 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS E 'Subn1{atcd into fhe public record in c0r!n5ction with item -pZ-1 on 1not Page 1 Walter i•-'oeman City Clerk F '12 `7 1 0 0 APPENDIX D Future Intersection Levels of Service with Project and Modifications ,;UUmittc d into the public record in con,�ection With item � on �el Waiter Fo Clerk City 195BBPAM.txt 0 • HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Analyst: 3, AMLSTEDT Inter.: 2390 Agency: Area Type: All Cather areas Date: 8/22/2041 Jurisd: CITY OF MIAMI/FDOT Period: AM PEAK HOUR Year : FUTURE W/PROJECT Project ID: loon CLUB - MODIFIED NTERSECTION E/W St: NE 19TH STREET NIS St: BISCAYNE BOULEVARD SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY i Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I {Eastbound L T R I L T R 1 L T R I L T R 1 No. Lanes 1 1 0 I 1 1 1 j 1 2 y 0 1 1 2 0 I LGConf i g I L TR I L T R I L TR ( L TR i Volume 123 11 33 1134 24 259 123 844 41 1209 1886 41 I Lane Width 112.0 11.0 112.0 11.0 11.0 111.0 11.0 111.0 11.0 RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas 5ignal,Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A I NB Left P Thru A f Thru P Right A 1 Right P Peds I Peds WB Left A j 8B Left A P Thru A j Thru A P Right A l Right A P Peds I Pods NB Right 1 EB Flight SB Right 1 WB Right A Green 26.0 10.0 46.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 All Red 4.0 ARe 0.0 0.0 Cycle Length: 90.0 seas Intersection Perfor=nce Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane (Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate -- Grp Capacity (s) V/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOSLOS Eastbound L 384 1328 0.06 0.29 23.4 C TR 459 1625 0.20 0.29 24.3 C 24.1 C Westbound L 371 1285 0.95 0.29 65.6 E T 51S 1783 0.11 0.29 23.5 C 41.4 D R 674 1516 0.48 0.44 18.2 B Northbound L 80 155 0.44 0.S1 30.3 C TR 1711 3348 0.61 0.51 17.2 B 17.7 B Southbound L 281 1694 1.20 0.62 189.8 F TR 2098 3372 1.01 0.62 38.6 D 53.9 D Intersection Delay o 42.1 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS a D 6 € { 0 ihe public ir► �[�r�6lecti � with recc�rci �� o! �z 1 on Page 1 item Clerk City .27 195BBPPM.txt 0 i HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Analyst: J. AHLSTEDT Inter.: 2390 Agency., Area Type: All other areas Date. 8/22/2001 Juried: CITY OF HIAHI/FDOT Period: PH PEAK HOUR Year : FUTURE W/PROJECT Project ID: 1800 CLUB - MODIFIED INTERSECTION E/W St: NE 19TH STREET NIS St: BISCAYNE BOULEVARD SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound 1 Southbound 1 I L T R ( L T R I L T R I L T R 1 No. 'Lanes 1 1 0 j 1 1 1 1 2 0 G 1 2 0 I LOCon£ig 1 L TR I L T R I L TR ( L TR 1 Volume .157 22 55 144 28 295 141 1843 133 1307 1129 32 1 Lane Width 112.0 11.0 112.0 11.0 11.0 111.0 11.D0 111.0 11.0 0 � RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 Duration 0.2S Area Type: All other areas _ Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3' 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A 1 NB Left P Thru A 1 Thru P Right A 1 Right P Peds 1 loads WB heft A I SB Left A P Thru A I Thru A P Right A 1 Right A P Peds ti i Peds NB Right 1 EB Right SB Right 1 WB Right A Green 10.0 15.0 87.0 Yellow 4.0 0.0 4.0 All Red 0.0 0.0 0•0 Cycle Length: 120.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lana Adj Sat Ratios Lane. Croup Approach Lana Group Floss Rate Grp Capacity (sj V/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 113 1355 0.68 0.08 68.9 E TR 134 1608 0.74 0.08 73.1 E 71.2 E Westbound L 81 971 1.30 0.08 259.6 F T 149 1783 0.23 0.08 52.2 D 109.0 F R 366 1516 0.90 0.24 69.2 E Northbound L 280 396 0.17 0.73 6.5 A TR 2416 3333 1.02 0.73 39.5 D 38.9 D Southbound L 272 1694 1.55 0.85 310.5 F TR 2867 3373 0.45 0.85 2.3 A 78.6 E Intersection De16y 60.8 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS - E ', br^:i =°od into the public fflc Mrd in connectlo vilth ii��rl on Page 1. in �{ JJ L' • 0 APPENDIX E Corridor Analysis . Submitted into the public record in connect wi ai Item on Walter Feemari r ,2 City Clerk' 0 INTNOUCTl 1 A level of service analysis was conducted using the techniques contained in the adopted rEI1a1g_qW the'v eiA h o an 1989-2000. These techniques are contained in the City of Miami publication ?r ,ggrtation QQ.UA' Q - e r in Migmi as revised September 1990. In performing the analysis, of the three possible scenarios available, Scenario 2 - maximum auto was used. The level of service analysis for The 1804 Club is documented in Tables 1 through 4. The proposed project is located in the Biscayne Boulevard corridor. The roadways providing capacity to the corridor are: Biscayne: Boulevard N.E. 2"d Avenue North Miami Avenue The transit routes providing capacity to the corridor are MetroBus Routes 3, 16, 32, 36, 62, 96, T, Biscayne Max, 9, 10, and 6. EXI - NG 200'1 LEVEL Q SI"RVlCE Table 1 presents an analysis of the existing 2001 corridor level of service. Roadway vehicular. capacities (column 2) were based upon data contained in Jon r-ors:Ideelne h ae i 'a las revised September 1990. Roadway vehicular volumes (column 4) were taken from an original traffic count taken on ,tune 28, 2001. This AADT volume was adjusted to reflect peak hour conditions by applying factors obtained from the count data. Mass Transit person trip capacities (columns 8, 9 and 10)were calculated from route schedules and equipment information supplied by the Miami -Dade TransitAgencning fi (MDTA) and data contained in s s: e ' I Gr Manaaernent in ll& ' as revised September 1990. Average weekday ridership data was obtained from MDTA, Total route ridership was available for MetroBus. Additionally, MDTA provided an estimated percentage of person trips during the peak 4 hours of the day. Because the MetroBus data reflected ridership on the entire route, some percentage of which is typically outside of the Biscayne Boulevard Corridor, it was necessary to estimate the portion of the total route ridership whiff bmstactga�lg �R hpMff s when they were in �In h ,�' Page E-1 THE 1800 CLUB herr+ i �- oil August 22, 2001 Walter Foeman City Clerk 0 0 the corridor. To facilitate this etlomwas abtalate of ned fromumesMetro, 1999 Bus surveys.h 2001 data on MetroBus boardings in the carr Transit volumes (column 12) were calculated using the ridership data and the percentage of passengers during the peak fours supplied by MDTA and estimating ridership in the corridor from actual load factors calculated from the MetroBus survey data. Thus, the transit volumes shown in column 12 reflect actual load factors calculated from MDTA surveys. As can be seen from Table 1, the existing Biscayne Boulevard Corridor currently operates at Level of Service "A". submitted Into the pubtio record in connection with item E2-( on -w= �)-OL Walter Foeman City Clerk Page E-2 THE k8a0 CLUB s �. August 22, 2401 0 0 • AUTO PERSON TRIPS 7,651 • TABLE 1 - EXISTING 2001 LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS • TRANSIT PERSON TRIPS 1,164 0 0.60 A TOTAL PERSON TRIPS 8,814 100.00% am B ROADWAY MODE 0.70 B MASS TRANSIT MODE CORRIDOR TOTALS 0.71 C CORRIDOR NAME 2001 ROADWAY ROADWAY ROADWAY ROADWAY ROADWAY ROADWAY LOCALBUS EXPRESS RAILTRAN TOTAL TOTAL TRANSIT CORRIDOR CORRIDOR CORRIDOR CORRIDOR Principal Roadway(s) CORR VEHICULAR PER. TRIP VEHICULAR PER. TRIP EXCESS PERSON 1.00 E PER, TRIP PER. TRIP PER. TRIP TRANSIT TRANSIT PERSON PERSON PERSON PERSON PERSON TYPE CAPACITY CAPACITY VOLUME VOLUME PER. TRIP TRIP PAX CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY PERSON TRIP TRIP TRIP TRIP TRIP HOUR @IPPV= 20 432 @PPV= CAPACITY Vic LOS @ LOAD = @ LOAD = @ LOAD = @ LOAD = TRIP EXCESS CAPACITY VOLUME EXCESS vcC LOS 4.12% MetroBus Rte 36 20 44.5 1.4 150.00% 1.4 2.arA MetroBus Rte 62 10 40.8 DESIGN DESIGN DESIGN DESIGN VOLUME CAPACITY 2 125.00% CAPACITY 0.17°/6 MetrcBus Rte T (Notes) (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) 150.00°/ (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) (15) (16) (17) 47 BISCAYNE CORRIDOR LS 4.051% MetroBus Rte 6 60 11.5 7 150.00% 35 0.62% 1,164 100.00% Biscayne Boulevard (5055) 2,720 3,806 3,129 4,380 -572 1.15 F 3,808 4,380 -572 1.15 F MetroBus Rte 3 389 389 167 221 389 167 221 0.43 A MetroBus Rte 16 392 392 146 245 392 148 245 0.38 A MetroBus Rte 32 387 387 48 339 387 48 339 0.12 A MetroBus Rte 36 400 400 33 367 400 33 367 0.08 A MetroBus Rte 62 734 734 89 645 734 89 645 0.12 A MetroBus Rte 95 447 447 2 445 447 2 445 0.00 A MetroBus Rte T 400 400 154 246 400 154 246 0.39 A MetroBus Rte MAX 519 519 189 331 519 189 331 0.36 A Biscayne Boulevard Subtotal 2,720 3,808 3129 4,380 -572 1.15 F 3,221 447 0 3,668 830 2,839 7,476 5,210 2,266 0.70 B N.E. 2nd Avenue (276) 2,720 3,808 1,577 2208 1,600 0.56 A 3,608 2,208 1,600 0.58 A MetroBus Rte 9 828 828 280 548 828 280 548 0.34 A MetroBus Rte 10 205 205 47 158 205 47 158 023 A N.E. 2nd Avenue Subtotal 2,720 3,806 1,577 2208 1,600 0.58 A 1,033 0 0 1,033 327 706 4,841 2,535 2,306 0S2 A Miami Avenue (308) 2,720 3,808 759 1,062 2,746 028 A 3,808 1,062 2,746 028 A MetroSus Rte 6 35 35 7 27 35 7 27 021 A Miami Avenue Subtotal 2,720 3,808 759 1,062 2,746 028 A 35 0 0 35 7 27 3,843 1,069 2,773 028 A TOTAL 8,150 11,424 5,465 7,651 3,773 0.67 B 4289 447 0 4,736 1,164 3,572 16,160 8,814 7,345 0.55 A LOS TABLE AUTO PERSON TRIPS 7,651 86.80% 0.00 A TRANSIT PERSON TRIPS 1,164 1320A 0.60 A TOTAL PERSON TRIPS 8,814 100.00% am B 0.70 B 0.71 C 0.80 C 0.81 D 0.90 D 0.91 E 1.00 E 1.01 F AVG RIDERSHIP DESIGN % SEATS PAX LOAD CAPACITY RIDERSHIP HEAD PER PER FACTOR WAY VEH HOUR MetroBus Rte 3 20 432 167 150.00% 389 14.381A MetroBus Rte 16 20 43.6 148 150.00°/ 392 12.68% MetroBus Rte 32 20 43.0 48 150.00% 387 4.12% MetroBus Rte 36 20 44.5 33 150.00% 400 2.arA MetroBus Rte 62 10 40.8 89 150.00% 734 7.67°/6 MetroBus Rte 95 15 44.7 2 125.00% 447 0.17°/6 MetrcBus Rte T 20 44.4 154 150.00% 400 1322% MetroBus Rte MAX 15 43.3 189 150.00°/ 519 16-21% MetroBus RIB 10 46.0 280 150.00% 828 24.05% MetroBus Rte 10 40 45.6 47 150.00% 205 4.051% MetroBus Rte 6 60 11.5 7 150.00% 35 0.62% 1,164 100.00% Submitted into the pub9c record 'r, ccrllectic th itemP21 0n Vj=s'.ia = c2mars C;5, Cierk THE 1800 CLUB PAGE 3 August 22, 2001 1] y2003 1QE W1JJJQUJ,JLJ9PROJE T Table 2 presents an analysis of the future year 2003 corridor level of service without the project. Roadway vehicular volumes and mass transit volumes was taken from Table 1 (2001) and adjusted to the year 2003 by applying a growth factor of 2% per year and adding committed development traffic. As can be seen from Table 2, it is estimated that the Biscayne Boulevard Corridor will continue to operate at Level of Service "A" in the year 2003 without the project. Submitted Into the public record in connoction with item 2 "' on ._,_i�j�..1 Walter Foeman City CIprk THE 1800 CLUS Page EA August 22, 2001 c� is • AuTo PERSON TRIPS 7,960 84.78% 2003 LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS WITHOUT PROJE@ TRANSIT PERSON TRIPS 1,429 • 0;60 A TOTAL PERSON TRIPS 9,388 100.00% 0.61 B TABLE 2 - ROADWAY MODE MASS TRANSIT MODE ROADWAY ROADWAY LOCAL BUS EXPRESS RAIL TITAN TOTAL CORRIDOR TOTALS CORRIDOR CORRIDOR CORRIDOR CORRIDOR TOTAL TRANSIT CORRIDOR NAME 2003 ROADWAY ROADWAY. ROADWAY VEHICULAR ROADWAY PER. TRIP EXCESS PERSON PER. TRIP PER. TRIP PER. TRIP TRANSIT TRANSIT PERSON PERSON PERSON PERSON PERSON Principal Roadway(s) - CORR VEHICULAR pER.TRIP VOLUME VOLUME PER.TRIP TRIP CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY PERSON TRIP TRIP TRIP TRIP TRIP TYPE CAPACITY CAPACITY @PPV= CAPACITY VIC LOS @ LOAD = @ LOAD = @ LOAD = @ LOAD = TRIP EXCESS - CAPACITY VOLUME EXCESS V/C LOS COMMITTED DEVELOPMENT -TRAFFIC @ppV= PAX 1.4 DESIGN DESIGN DESIGN DESIGN VOLUME CAPACITY 1,235 2.18 CAPACITY Biscayne BouleVard (5056) 351 491 PAX 14 LOCAL 8) 1 it 1 73 14 15) 16 1 Notes 1 28 3 4 5 .MetrOBw Rte 32 4.12% 9 9 Me roBus Rte 36 2.82% 6 91SCAYNE CORRIDOR Biscayne goulid (5056) eva LS 2,720 3,808 3,255 4,557 -749 1.20 F 389 0 0 389 206 183 3,808 389 4,557 208 -749 74 183 1.20 F MelroBus Rte 3 29 29 MetoBus Rte MAX 1821% 392 0 0 392 181 211 392 181 211 MetroBus Rte 18 MetroBw Rte 10 4.069A 9 9 387 0 0 387 - 59 328 387 59 328 MetroBus Rte 32 400 0 0 400 40 360 400 40 360 MetroSm Rfe 36 734 0 0 734 110 624 734 110 624 MetroBus Rte 62 0 447 0 447 2 444 447 2 444 MetroBus Rte 95 400 0 0 400 189 211 400 189 211 MetroBus Rte T - 519 0 0 519 232 _ 288 519 232 288 n1 E. 2nd Ave�we 7276). 2.720 3,808 7,o41 A,tai -'-- — n 0 828 344 484 828 344 484 LOS TABLE AuTo PERSON TRIPS 7,960 84.78% 0,00 A TRANSIT PERSON TRIPS 1,429 15.22% 0;60 A TOTAL PERSON TRIPS 9,388 100.00% 0.61 B 0:70 B 0.71.0 0.80 C 0.81 D 0.90 D 0.91 E 1.00 E 1.01 F GROWTH FACTOR 1.02 Per Year COMMITTED DEVELOPMENT -TRAFFIC VPH PAX TRANSIT 882 1,235 2.18 15.00% TRANSIT Biscayne BouleVard (5056) 351 491 PAX LOCAL EXPRESS RAIL TOTAL MetroBus Rte 3 14.386A 31 31 MeftBus Rte 16 12.68% 28 28 .MetrOBw Rte 32 4.12% 9 9 Me roBus Rte 36 2.82% 6 6 MetroBus Rte 62 7,67% 17 17 MetmBwRte 95 0,17% 0 0 . MetroBus Rte T 13.22% 29 29 MetoBus Rte MAX 1821% 35 35 Metro&u Rte 9 24.05% 52 52 MetroBw Rte 10 4.069A 9 9 MetroBusRte6 0.62% 1 1 0 218 Sub l?reu .^'c i"e public record in teOnne t! itertt • Vjalter FDernan City Clerk THE PAG 5 1800 CLUB August 22, 2001 C 0 PROECT.TRAFFtC Table 3 presents projeettraffrcand mass transit ridership based upon PM peak hour project traffic. The project site is located in Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) 603. The cardinal distribution of the traffic within TAZ 603 was obtained from Miami -Dade County. The distribution is as follows: North -Northeast 8.91%, East -Northeast 2.75% East -Southeast 4.02% South -Southeast 5.40% South -Southwest 26.40% West -Southwest 22.07% West -Northwest 14.90% North -Northwest 15,66°fin Using this trip distribution, the project trip assignment was determined. This is shown in Figure 1. ,. Submitted into tho public retard in connection with item �2 - �_ cin! � -u Weller Foeman C;itrj Clerk THE 1800 OEM Page E-6August 22, 2001 • AUTO PERSON TRIPS 452 85.00% 0.00 A TRANSIT PERSON TRIPS 80 15.00% • TOTAL PERSON TRIPS 532 100.00% 0.61 8 TABLE 3 - PROJECT TRAFFIC 0.70 B • 0.71 C 0.80 C • 0.81 D 0.90 D EXPRESS 0.91 E 1.00 E ROADWAY MODE 1.01 F 11 MetroBus Rte 16 12.68% 10 MASS TRANSIT MODE 10 MetroBus Rte 32 4.12-A CORRIDORTOTALS 3 CORRIDOR NAME 2003 ROADWAY ROADWAY ROADWAY ROADWAY ROADWAY ROADWAY LOCAL BUS EXPRESS RAIL TRAN TOTAL TOTAL TRANSIT CORRIDOR CORRIDOR CORRIDOR CORRIDOR 11 Principal Roadway(s) CORR VEHICULAR PER. TRIP VEHICULAR PER.TRIP EXCESS PERSON MetroBus Rte 9 24.05% PER. TRIP PER. TRIP PER. TRIP TRANSIT TRANSIT PERSON PERSON PERSON PERSON PERSON 0 • TYPE CAPACITY CAPACITY @PPV= VOLUME VOLUME @PPV= PER. TRIP CAPACITY TRIP V/C LOS CAPACITY @ LOAD = CAPACITY (a2 LOAD = CAPACITY @ LOAD = CAPACITY @ LOAD = PERSON TRIP TRIP EXCESS TRIP CAPACITY TRIP VOLUME TRIP EXCESS TRIP Iter 1 2. l on 19 1.4 1.4 Walter Foe^ar1 • DESIGN DESIGN DESIGN DESIGN VOLUME CAPACITY CAPACITY V/C LOS (Notes) (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) (15) (16) (17) BISCAYNE CORRIDOR LS Bscayne Boulevard (5056) 2,720 3,808 323 452 3,356 0.12 A 3,8D8 452 3,356 0.12 A MetroBos Rte 3 389 0 0 389 11 377 389 11 377 MetroBus Rte 16 392 0 0 392 10 382 392 10 382 MetroBus Rte 32 367 0 0 387 3 364 387 3 384 Me"Bus Rte 36 400 0 0 400 2 398 400 2 398 MetroBus Rte 62 734 0 0 734 6 728 734 6 728 MetroBus Rte 95 0 447 0- 447 0 447 447 0 447 MetroBus Rte T 400 0 0 400 11 389 400 11 389 MetroBus Rte MAX 519 0 0 519 13 506 519 13 506 Biscayne Boulevard Subtotal 2,720 3,806 323 452 3,356 012 q 3,221 447 0 3,668 57 3,611 7,476 509 6,967 0.07 A N.E. 2nd Avenue (276) 2,720 3,808 0 0 3,808 0.00 q 3,808 0 3,808 0.00 A MetroBm Rte 9 828 0 0 828 19 609 828 19 809 • LOS TABLE AUTO PERSON TRIPS 452 85.00% 0.00 A TRANSIT PERSON TRIPS 80 15.00% 0.60 A TOTAL PERSON TRIPS 532 100.00% 0.61 8 452 0.70 B 0.71 C 0.80 C 0.81 D 0.90 D EXPRESS 0.91 E 1.00 E 11 1.01 F 11 PROJECT TRAFFIC VPH PAX TRANSIT 323 452 80 15.00% TRANSIT Biscayne BorAevard (5056) 323 452 PAX LOCAL EXPRESS RAIL TOTAL MetroBus Rte 3 14.38°•6 11 11 MetroBus Rte 16 12.68% 10 10 MetroBus Rte 32 4.12-A 3 3 MetroSto Rte 36 2.82% 2 2 MetroBus Rte 62 7.67% 6 6 MetroBus Rte 95 0.17% 0 0 MetroBus Rta T 13.22% 11 11 MetroBus Rte MAX 1621% 13 13 MetroBus Rte 9 24.05% 19 19 MetroBus Rte 10 4.05% 3 3 MetroBus Rte 6 D.62% 0 0 80 0 0 80 Submitted iTtO the PUNC record in conneo ont.r!th Iter 1 2. l on 19 Walter Foe^ar1 • City Clerk E 1800 CLUB PAG 7 August 22, 2001 '2 =Y—�T • FIGURE E -'I PROJECT TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT THE 1800 CLUB Page E•8 August 22, 2001 33172 72165 NE 20TH STREET 11146 NE 19TH STREET 22124 21$5 NE 18 33125 STREET �► • PROJECT 5199 NE.17TH ERR 66158 W Q © m W z 11.1z F0 99187 45199 45199 AM/PM PEAK HOUR PROJECT TRAFFIC IN VPH Submitted into the public record in conne,etit, with item 2.. ► on Walter oeman CIt1 Clerk FIGURE E -'I PROJECT TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT THE 1800 CLUB Page E•8 August 22, 2001 • 0 Project transit ridership was estimated based upon the assumption that 15% of project person trips would be by mass transit. Assignment of person trips was proportioned to the MetroBus routes . YE L OF SRI R E T Table 4 presents an analysis of the future year 2003 corridor level of service with the project. Roadway vehicular volumes and mass transit volumes were determined by adding the data from Table 2 (Year 2003 Without Project) and Table 3 (Project Traffic). As can be seen from Table 4, it is estimated that the Biscayne Boulevard Corridor will operate at Level of Service "B" in the year 2003 with the project. Submitted into the public record in connectic nth item on ' ALIAt Walter Foeman City Clerk Page E_g THE 1800 CLUB August 22, 2001 o z)79 ny!�ee�.a,........__. - 1,641 2,297 1,011 u.ou n .. � �_ ..eroe —m 2,720 3808 R'JR n a 828 363 465 828 363 485 0.44 A LOS TABLE • 8,412 84,79% 1,508 1521% 0.00 A 0.60 A TRANSIT PERSON TOTAL PERSON TRIPS • TABLE 4.2003 LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS WITH PROJECT • .708 0.71 C • 0.80 C 0.81 D - MASS TRANSIT MODE 0.91 E C�DORTOTALS 1.01 F ROADWAY MODE ROADWAY ROADWAY ROADWAY ROADWAY LOCALBUS EXPRESS RAILTRAN TOTAL TOTAL TRANSIT CORRIDOR CORRIDOR CORRIDOR CORRIDOR CORRIDOR NAME 2003 ROADWAY ROADWAY VEHICULAR PER. TRIP EXCESS PERSON PER. TRIP PER. TRIP PER. TRIP TRANSIT TRANSIT PERSON PERSON PERSON PERSON PERSON TRIP • PdndpalRoadvmy(s) CORR VEHICULAR CAPACITY PER.TRIP CAPACitt VOLUME VOLUME. PER. TRIP TRIP CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY PERSON TRIP TRIP CAPACITY TRIP VOLUME TRIP EXCESS Vic LOS TYPE �ppV= @PPV= CAPACITY V/C LOS @LOAD = (� LOAD = @ LOAD = @ LOAD = TRIP EXCESS CAPACITY - - 14 DESIGN DESIGN DESIGN DESIGN VOLUME CAPACITY 14 4 5 6 8 9 TO) 11 12 13 14 15 16 1 Notes 13 BISCAYNE CORRIDOR LS 2,720 3,808 3,578 5,010 -1,202 1.32 F 389 217 172 3,808 389 5,010 217 -1,202 772 1:32 0,56. F A Biscayne Boulevard (5056) 369 0 0 201 0.49 A MetroBus Rte 3 392 0 0 392 191 201 392 191 . - MetroBus Rte 16 387 0 0 387 62 325 387 62 325 0,16 A MetroBus Rte 32 40D 0 0 400 42 358 400 42 358 0.11 A Metroeus Rte 36 734 0 0 734 116 618 734 116 618 0.16 A MetroBus Rte 62 0 447 0 447 3 444 447 3 444 0.01 A McImBus Rte 95 400 0 0 400 199 200 400 199 200 0.50 A Meb%Bus Rte T 519 0 0 _ 519 244 275 519 244 275 0.47 A ny!�ee�.a,........__. - 1,641 2,297 1,011 u.ou n .. � �_ ..eroe —m 2,720 3808 R'JR n a 828 363 465 828 363 485 0.44 A LOS TABLE , AUTO PERSON TRIPS TRIPS 8,412 84,79% 1,508 1521% 0.00 A 0.60 A TRANSIT PERSON TOTAL PERSON TRIPS 9,920 100.00% 0.61 8 .708 0.71 C • 0.80 C 0.81 D 0.90 D 0.91 E 1.00 E 1.01 F is Submitted into the public record in connection th iters P2-1 on Is a Walter Foeman City Clerk P GE 1 HE 1800 CLUB Augmt22, =1 n i 2iFa i • • 17J Is E SITE UTILITY STUDY I. DRAINAGE A. Drainage Area • The site is located at the NW corner of North Bayshore Drive and NE 18th Street. It has approximately 280 feet of frontage on North Bayshore Drive, and approximately 250 feet of frontage on NE 18th street. It consists of a total of 1.44 acres. After development, approximately 95% of each parcel will be impervious areas and approximately 5% of the sites will remain as pervious areas. The storm water discharge will consist primarily of building roofs, driveways and landscape areas run-off. The coefficient of run-off is arrived at as follows: 0.95 (impervious) x 0.90 = 0.855 +0.05 (pervious) x 0.30 — 0.015 overall coefficient 0.87 B. Existing Drainage System The City of Miami presently maintains a roadway drainage system in all fronting streets. This site is presently fully developed. The existing roadway system appears to be of sufficient capacity to handle the present conditions. C. Proposed Drainage System The primary drainage system of this building will consist of drainage wells which will allow the stormwater runoff to be fully contained on-site. No off-site runoff is anticipated from this building. It is anticipated that four drainage wells will be sufficient to handle the runoff (See Table 1 for drainage calculations). The stormwater will be collected thru a system of catch basin inlets and transported by pipes to the well locations. The wells will allow the stormwater to flow into the Biscayne Aquifer. The wells will be designed to handle the stormwater runoff and tested for capacity as they are installed. Runoff from driving surfaces such as driveways and parking areas 10 pubille r®cord in Conn n h itsrm l on 12, Vllaiter Foe fir] City Clerk • 0 will be diverted thru detention structures which will capture the oils and greases prior to flowing into the wells. Table 1 Drainage Calculations Runoff Generations 1. Total Gross Area a. Impervious b. Pervious 2. Average Runoff Coefficient 3. Design Storm 4. Time of Concentration 5. Rainfall Intensity 6. Peak Runoff (Q) - C;A 1.44 Acres 95% or 1.37 Acres 5% or 0.07 Acres (.95) (.9) + (.05) (.3) _ 0.87 5 years 10.00 min 6.10 in/hr (.87) (6.10) (1.44) = 7.64 CFS Assume each 24" diameter drainage well flows at 750 gpm per foot of head - using 1.5 feet of head: 1.5 x 750 gpm = 1,125 gpm per well 1,125 gpm = 2.50 CFS (Peak runoff) 7.64 CFS — 3.05 Wells (Flow per well) 2.50 CFS Provide 4 - 24" diameter wells Detention Tank: Providing 11/x minute detention time of storage in tank. Volume of tank required to handle 1,125 gpm for 1.5 min. 1,125 gpm x 1.5 min = 1,687 gal/tank or 225 ft3 each Provide 5 tanks each with the following interior dimensions: 5' (width) x 5' (height) x 10' (length) = 250 ft3 Provide 4 tanks with 300 ft3 volume each Submilied Frau jtj<<i, public record in connect' �� with item 2-- on t a Walter Foeman E I ^ City Clerk • • II. WATER DISTRIBUTION The Miami -Dade Water and Sewer Department owns and operates a 16 inch water main along North Bayshore Drive, a 6 inch water main along NE 18th Street and a 4 inch water main on the alleyway along the back of the property. It will be required to install a new 12 inch water main along the property frontage on NE 181h street, connected to the 16 inch water main on North Bayshore Drive. The water connections to serve each building will be done from the new 12 inch gain. The connections will consist of fire line supply, domestic water and irrigation water services. No on-site wells are planned for this project. The calculations for anticipated water volumes required for this project are shown below, in Table 2. Table 2 Water Volumes Residential Apartments 450 units @ 200gpd/unit ................... 90,000 gpd Office 29,700 ft2 @ 10 gpd/100 ft2 2,970 gpd Total flow demand ............................... 102,341 gpd Restaurant 186 seats @ 50 gpd/seat .................... 9,300 gpd Retail 1,414 ft2 @ 5 gpd/100 ft2 ...................... 71 gpd III. SANITARY SEWER The Miami Dade Water and Sewer Department owns and operates a gravity sewer system along the two streets with frontage on this property and the alleyway at the back of the property. It is anticipated that a single gravity connection to the existing 12 inch sewer main on NE 18th Street will be sufficient to serve this project. No pump station will be built on-site to serve the project. Table 3, below, shows the anticipated sewage flow calculations. Submitted Into the public record in connocti n with ItemL2--, on Walter l~ ernan 61 —12 "i City Cleric • 1] Table 3 Sewage Flows Average Flow (from Table 2) ....................102,341 gpd Average Flow........................................71 gpm Peak Flow (71 x 3.5) ...............................250 gpm II:\TAI.IA\WPDOCS%Engineeringl Oliverlo\1800cluh\51te0tilstudy.wpd . Submittud into the public record in connecticin Pith item °�' Lm, on a �.! Walter oeman city clerk El Submitted into the public record in connectio oth Item on a W.gltPr ()t? an City clerk 0 0 0 0 1800 Club Economic Impact Analyses Submitted to. City of Miami Prepared For. SCOM Prepared by: SHARPTON, BRUNSON & COMPANY, P.A. One Southeast Third Avenue Suite 2100 Miami, Florida 33131 (305) 374-1574 Scbr<+it2ed into the public record in cecti n with item 2'' can .4R(!. Walter Foeman City Clerk U 0 • 0 1800 CLIMB TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE(S) THE PROJECT OVERVIEW 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction 2 Summary of Benefits 3 OBJECTIVES AND DEFINITIONS Objectives 5 Definition of Economic and Tax Impact 5 Direct and Indirect Effects 5 Measures of Economic Impact 6 Description of Results 7 DISCUSSION OF THE RESULTS BY ECONOMIC INDICATORS Impact Indicators Results of Indicators Impact of Construction Impact of Ongoing Operations Impact on Local Tax Revenues Analysis by Economic Indicators Employment Wages Output Local Taxes Public Sector Cost Impact Fees EXHIBITS Exhibit I: Summary of Economic Impact Exhibit II: Impact and Other Fees 8 8 8 9 9 9 9 10 10 11 12 12 13 Spomitted into the public: record in conncctl n with Item ��, on .i_ Waitor Foaman ,) rj 2 City Cterk • 0 0 Project Overview 1800 Club is located on North Bayshore Drive at 18th Street in the city of Miami, Florida (the Project) . The Project consists of 450 apartment units, 10,000 square feet of retail space and 633 parking spaces. The total lot area is 117,892 square feet (2.71 acres). Excellent area demographics and a booming local economy enhance 1800 Club's status as one of the future premier multifamily opportunities. Targeted for completion in 2004, 1800 Club will set a new standard of excellence in South Florida apartment living. It is located on one of North Bayshore Drive's last undeveloped high-rise bay -front parcels. North Bayshore Drive is considered the premier residential corridor north of the Downtown Miami area. With the new Miami -Dade Performing Arts Center currently under development a few blocks away, 1800 Club will be situated in one of the most desirable spots in Miami. f� Interstate 95 is less than half a mile to the west, while near -by Interstate 395 and Interstate 1-195 provide quick access to Miami Beach. The property is only six miles from Miami International Airport, and a short distance north of the Port of Miami. The property's proximity to 1-95 and ease of access to the surrounding transportation network augments its bay -front location and creates a uniquely convenient and desirable address. Submitled, :n,.o tho public record in c:orin0l ti In with Iters P? -Lon 1111 -- Walter Foeman City Cleric 1 411 0 Introduction This document represents an in-depth economic and tax benefits analysis of the developmental and operation of a first class apartment rental complex and retail facilities. The Project currently contemplated is comprised of the following components: ❑ 450 units of high-quality residential. ❑ 10,000 square feet of retail. ❑ 633 parking spaces. This analysis encompasses the entire Project and estimates the economic and tax benefits for both its developmental and operational phases. Submitted into the public record in Connectio ith item 2 • on WJY-RL Walter Foe:man City Clerk 2 0 0 • 0 Summary of Benefits The Project will bring significant economic benefits to the city of Miami (the City). This section summarizes the impact of the project on employment, public sector revenues and other economic benefits as a result of the development. Employment Employment considerations include the direct employment resulting from the Project, Average developmental construction phase employment will be for approximately 225 employees and the Project management is expected to employ 25 people for on-going maintenance and operations of the facilities. In addition, businesses leasing retail/office space in the building are estimated to employ 19 people. Wages To compute the wages associated with the new employment we started with budgeted data directly related to the developmental and operational phases of the Project, and we incorporated data from our research on retail sales. Total Direct and indirect impacts expected from wages associated with the new development approximate the following: One Time $31,643,849 Annual $ 2,489,940 0 Tax Revenue The estimate of the public sector revenues associated with the development includes taxes and other revenues generated directly by the Project. Although public sector costs are important elements in measuring fiscal impact, these benefits have not been quantified in this document. This analysis only measures the benefits derived from the development. Annual tax revenue expected to be created totals $2,232,811. Output The estimate of total economic impact is measured by total output. This analysis measures the economic impact of developmental costs and ongoing, operational expenditures. To determine the effect of respending within the City, we utilized a multiplier to compute total direct and indirect benefits. Total output expected to be generated, as a result of the developmental and operational phases of the Project will approximate the following: One Time $122,481,653 Annual $ 7,798,680 Subpi!Uod into the public record in connection wlth item "r on&: 'o Walter Foornatn Y 12 7 2 City Clerk • 0 • Summary of BGnGfits Significant Community Benefits: Jobs Wages Taxes > Economic Activity Residents' and Retail/Business Office Employees' Spending Impacting Local Businesses: ➢ Food Recreation/Entertainment ➢ Transportation ➢ Retail The following table and charts summarize the economic impact of the Brickell Station development. Economic Activity Stimulated Output Wages Taxes Jobs Created CONSTRUCTION PERIOD ANNUAL IMPACT RECURRING $122,481,653 $ 7,798,680 31,643,849 2,489,940 2,232,811 $154,125.502 $ 12.521,431 225 44 Submittod into the public record in connection ith (tern P.1 on } 6( Walter Fooman City Clerk 10 ei2 4 • • 0 i Objectives And Definitions Objectives The objective of this analysis is to provide information on the various benefits created by the Project and to prepare an estimate of such benefits to the City. Our analysis is based on an economic model, which estimates economic and tax impacts of various projects on a designated area. The model is specifically tailored to the City of Miami (the City). Definition of Economic and Tax Impact The construction and subsequent operation of the Project will create important benefits within the City. These benefits include new income, new jobs, new tax revenue and new economic activity impacting upon every sector of the local economy. Moreover, through the multiplier effect of respending and reinvesting, indirect economic benefits are added to the direct benefits brought about by initial construction expenditures, the expenditures from ongoing operations and new spending at the retail enterprises. Direct and Indirect Effects The total economic impact of public and private projects and policies on a region does not end with the impact from the initial construction expenditures; the continued benefits to the local economy must also be considered. Income to firms furnishing construction materials and services is subsequently converted into employee salaries, material purchases, investment in plant and equipment, savings, profits, purchases of services, and a variety of other economic activities. Income to laborers is subsequently • respent for purchasing of food, housing, transportation, education, entertainment, medical and dental services, clothing, personal services, and a wide variety of other goods and services. Furthermore, income to the governmental unit is respent as salaries, purchases, and support of a variety of programs, including education, transportation, and social services. In turn, individuals, firms, and governments furnishing these goods and services again spend their income for more purchases, salaries, investments, and savings. In this manner, indirect benefits result each time the initial sum is respent, and the additional sum available in the local economy induces further job creation, business development and savings. Quantification of these indirect benefits has been the object of considerable economic study. Because economic relationships are so complex in our modern society, no single area or political unit is a completely self-contained economic unit. Therefore, purchases from other areas and political units are necessary, and goods services are exported in return. As purchases are made from other units, some of the benefits of economic respending are lost to the local economy. Ultimately, a smaller and smaller portion of the initial sum would remain, until, after several rounds of respending, an insignificant sum is left. Submitted into the publlC 5 record in connection with item on / d Walter Foeman 7 2 City Clerk I Objectives And Definitions The indirect effects can be viewed as Measures of Economic Impact a set of "ripples" in the economy. Indirect, like direct, resources require Various measures can be used to labor, materials, equipment and indicate the impact of a policy or services for their production to induce project on a region. Specifically, further job creation and spending of for this study, they are the wages. increases in local employment, wages, tax revenue and output that result. Definitions of these The "ripple" of the indirect effect measures are as follows: multiplies the original impact of the purchase. The common measure of Employment is measured full-time the magnitude of the "ripple" effect is equivalent jobs. called a multiplier. A multiplier W&4'es include wages, salaries, measures the total magnitude of the and proprietor's income only. They impact on each particular economic may include non -wage indicator as a multiple of the initial, compensation, such as pensions, direct effect. For instance, a insurance, and other fringe multiplier of "1" would signify no benefits. Wages are assumed to "ripple" effects as the total impact is 1 be expended by households in the times the initial impact, while a multiplier of "2" would imply that the area at which the wage-earner total impact is 2 times the direct works. effect. Local taxes include additional revenues from both ad valorem and The actual magnitude of a multiplier non ad valorem assessments. depends on the likelihood the goods Direct expenditures include those and services purchased in a region sums expended for land would be produced in, or provided acquisition, site preparation and all from the region. hard and soft costs associated with a project. The model we used to estimate the Indirect expenditures are those total economic impact incorporates a sums expended within the local multiplier developed by utilizing past economy as a result of the "ripple" consumption and production patterns effect described earlier, in the City. Output describes total economic activity, and is essentially There will be significant economic equivalent to the sum of direct and benefit derived from the expenditures indirect expenditures (exclusive of of the residents of the Project on Wages and taxes). eating, drinking, grocery, recreation, retail etc. This report does not include Submittod Into the public the economic impact of such record in connection with expenditures. itom on r' 6 Waiter Fooman c. .i �� Fa city ty cled, i * 0 Objectives And Definitions Description of Results For the purpose of describing the total economic benefits of the Project, the related expenditures and economic activity stimulated have been broken into two categories: Developmental Annual Recurring Developmental expenditures include those expenditures related to the design and construction phase of the Project and related amenities. • Annual recurrinc7 activities stimulated are those expenditures incurred in connection with the ongoing operation of the Project, and the sales and expenditures of the retail enterprises leasing space at the Project. • • SubrnittOd it-sto the public record i�,connection � � 7 item �----� Matter Foeman A City Clerk • 0 • Discussion Of The Results By Economic Indicators Impact Indicators We measured the Project's impact on four commonly used indicators of economic activity. Those indicators are: Jobs Wages Total output Local taxes Results of Indicators Exhibit I details the Project's direct and indirect impact on the above economic indicators for Miami. A summary of such impact follows: The economic indicator most commonly measured, and publicly reported on to gauge the economic impact of a public project is output. The impact of a project on the indicator output is often referred to as the project's economic impact. Impact of Construction The site preparation and construction expenditures, including soft costs and impact fees are estimated at $69 million. Such activity will create approximately 200 new full time equivalent jobs and employ a maximum of 350 workers during peak periods. The workers will earn approximately $16.8 million in direct wages, DEVELOPMENT One Time OUTPUT WAGES TAXES EMPLOYMENT Direct $ 65,177,551 $16,839,000 225 Indirect 57.304.102 14,804,849 $122,481,653 $31,643,849 225 ANNUAL Operational: Direct $ 3,150,000 $ 850,000 $2,232,811 25 Indirect 2,769,480 747,320 Retail 1,879,200 892,620 19 $ 7,798,680 $ 2,489,940 $2,232.811 44 Submitted into tho public record in connection with Item P24 on LE-11-10 Walter Foernan j -- ,7 12 City Clerk Discussion Of The Results By Economic Indicators Impact of Ongoing Operations and Retail Enterprises As a result of the on-going operation and maintenance of the Project, Miami will gain approximately 25 new, permanent, full-time equivalent jobs. The wages of the workers who obtain these positions will provide an impact of approximately $1.6 million annually. The retail enterprises are estimated to create 19 permanent, full- time equivalent jobs. The wages of the workers employed by the office tenants will provide an impact of approximately $892 thousand annually. The total expenditures for the Project's • operations, and the retail sales will provide a new, permanent impact of $10.3 million annually to the City's economy. This impact consists of the effects of new retail sales and the direct expenditures from the maintenance, security and day-to-day operation of the Project, and the multiplied effects of such spending thus creating indirect benefits. Impact on Local Tax Revenues As a result of the construction and operation of the Project, various state, city and city governments and agencies would gain an estimated annual tax benefit of $2.2 million. Analysis by Economic Indicators Our analysis of the economic and tax benefits of the Project was done by each major phase of the Project. We identified the major phases to be developmental and operational. . This analysis determines the economic benefits to the City by identifying such benefits for each of the phases. The effects on economic indicators used to measure benefits (employment, wages, output and taxes) were computed for each phase. Employment Employment is one of the most important economic benefits of the Project. It is one of the most accessible and direct benefits for the City's residents and it's residents and is a primary means by which developmental, operational and maintenance expenditures generate indirect economic benefits. A portion of this employment occurs on-site as a result of new spending at the retail enterprises, and a portion is derived from on-going operations of the Project. Further employment is generated off-site by the expenditures of employees of the Project and businesses located in the Project, at area businesses. As can be seen in Exhibit I, total short-term (developmental) employment will average 225 employees over a twenty -month period and a total on-going employment will average 44. The total on-going positions can be summarized as follows: )o. Management Security Parking Maintenance/Facilities Retail Submitted Into the public record in connection with item g ^l on Walter i"oernan .>� "" City Clerk • • .7 0 i Discussion of The Results By Economic Indicators Wages The analysis deemed wages are a direct by-product of employment. As discussed in the above section, both on-site and off- site jobs are created. There were both temporary and permanent in nature. To compute the wages associated with the new employment we started with budgeted data directly related to the developmental and operational phases of the Project, and we incorporated data from our research on retail sales. Employment, such as construction related employment, was obtained directly from construction estimates. These numbers were tested for reasonableness. Output The output generated, as a result of the development and operations of the Project, is caused by the following type of expenditures: Development costs expended in the City (100%) Annual operational expenditures of management company New spending in the locality by employees of businesses located in the Project To incorporate the impact of dollars being respent and/or reinvested in the City, a multiplier was applied to total direct output. A multiplier of 1.8792 was used to determine total direct and indirect output created by the Project. This multiplier indicates that for every $100 spent in Miami, another $187.92 will be respent or reinvested in Miami. This multiplier was obtained from the Dade City Planning Department. Direct output from the developmental phase of the Project is primarily a result of developer costs. These costs include land acquisition, site preparation and soft and hard costs relating to the Project's construction. To determine the total output we determined what development costs were expected to be or had been spent in Miami. Total direct output during the development phase is $65.2 million. Total indirect output created by the direct responding in Miami is $57.3 million. Thus total Miami Output from the development of the Project is $122 million. The final component of output results from the direct operating expenditures of the Project, and the indirect benefits created as a result of the multiplier effect on direct output. The Developer provided us with an annual operating budget for the Project. An overall assumption was made that all expenditures would be spent initially in the City. Submitted into the publiG10 record in connection with w� item P2- I on Walter F=oeman City Clerk 1.1 :7 0 i Discussion Of The Results By Economic Indicators Output (Contd.) The total operating expenditures incorporate all estimated expenses of the ongoing operation of the Project. The impact of the retail enterprises was measured separately as an economic indicator. To incorporate the potential respending and reinvesting in Miami, the multiplier effect was measured. By applying a multiplier of 1.8792 to the total direct output from operating expenditures and the retail enterprises, we determined total output (direct and indirect) from on-going operating expenditures and retail sales. Total direct output created from retail sales and operating expenditures is $4.2 million. Total indirect output created from retail sales and operating expenditures is $3.6 million. Total output created from ongoing operations and retail enterprises is approximately $7.8 million. Local Taxes A key and significant benefit generated from the development and operation of the Project is taxes. Several types of tax revenue will be generated from this project including ad valorem taxes. Specific ad valorem taxes include real and personal property taxes. Other taxes include occupational taxes and community development taxes. New real property taxes will be assessed on the Project. The assessment is based on a predetermined mileage rate being applied to the taxable value of the real property. We computed real property taxes for the developmental phase based on the cost of the development of the Project. This assessment base is very conservative since tax on real property typically is assessed on appraised values and not actual cost. The basis for ongoing taxes is also overall cost. The mileage rate was obtained from the City Tax Collectors office relative to the Project's location. The projected annual real property taxes are approximately $2.2 million. Total ad valorem taxes assessed by Miami -Dade County are allocated based on mileage rates to certain governmental entities. Listed below is the allocation of projected tax revenue. City Operating $ 733,426 School Operating 709,535 County Operating 468,920 Debt Service - City 104,367 Debt Service -County 53,162 South Florida Water 48,678 Library Operating 28,620 School Debt Service 74,606 Florida Inland Navigation 3,343 Environmental Projects 8.154 TOTAL $ 2.232.811 Submitted into tho public record In connectlop vylth Item zr� on 1 11 Walter Foeman City Clerk 2 _ `� 7 Discussion Of The Results By Economic Indicators Local Taxes (Contd.) Although not quantified, the City, through its receipt of allocated state sales taxes will receive an additional benefit as a result of the development and operation of the Project, and from the retail enterprises. Public Sector Costs Impact fees Very significant factors in measuring the economic impact on a specific region of a project are impact and other required development fees. A summary of these fees 01 are listed below: City of Miami Developmental Impact Fee City of Miami Developmental Admin Fee Dade City Impact Fee Administrative Fee Building Permit Fee Installation Energy Fee Other Fees For the purpose of this economic impact analysis, fees are included as a part of the direct development cost (output). Impact fees total approximately $1.6 million and other fees total approximately $1.0 million. These fees are shown in detail in Exhibit ll. Submitted kn1 a the public record in connecl!'Uq with 12 itern Pz-1i Wi► l Walter Fooman City Cleric * 0 Exhibit List Exhibit 1 Summary of Economic Impact Exhibit 11 Impact and Other Fees MSubrnitt4;u MLO U -I0 put)11c record in connecti� , Mid 13 Item Z " on Waiter Foeman City Clerk ` P� _. 7 • • • 9 0 Exhibit - l 1800 CLUB ECONOMIC BENEFITS STUDY SUMMARY OF ECONOMIC IMPACT EXHIBIT I *S.alabmit[ou wito tho public record in Cor�ectlil ite;n e ^ oon � 1A I Wait;;r �oemarr City Clerk 14 OUTPUT WAGES EMPLOYMENT TAXES DIRECT DEVELOPMENTAL $ 65,177,552 $ 16,839,000 225 OPERATIONAL 3,150,000 850,000 25 $ 2,232,811 RETAIL 1,000,000 475,000 19 TOTAL DIRECT 69,327,552 18,164,000 269 2,232,811 INDIRECT DEVELOPMENTAL 57,304,103 14,804,849 OPERATIONAL 2,769,480 747,320 RETAIL 879,200 417,620 TOTAL INDIRECT 60,952,783 15,969,789 TOTAL BENEFITS $ 34,133,789 269 —f--2,232,811 $ 130,280,335 TOTAL DEVELOPMENTAL $ 122,481,655 $ 31,643,849 225 TOTAL OPERATIONAL 5,919,480 1,597,320 25 $ 2,232,811 TOTAL RETAIL 1,879,200 892,620 19 TOTAL BENEFITS $ 34,133,789 X269 $ 2,232,811 $ 130,280,335 *S.alabmit[ou wito tho public record in Cor�ectlil ite;n e ^ oon � 1A I Wait;;r �oemarr City Clerk 14 * 0 Exhibit -11 1800 CLUB EXHIBIT II ECONOMIC BENEFITS STUDY IMPACT AND OTHER FEES IMPACT AND OTHER FEES: A. Development Square Footages: Square Footage 1) Total gross building area (with parking) 943,000 2) Maximum development area (FAR) 848,822 3) Residential F.A.R. 577,509 4) Retail F.A.R. 10,000 5) Lobby area 4,195 6) Gross parking area 250,566 B. Impact Fees: Amount 1) City of Miami Development Impact Fee (Ord - 10426) 2) Development Impact Administration Fee (Ord - 10426) $ 404,376 12,131 3) Miami -Dade County Roadway Impact Fee 421,200 4) Miami -Dade County School Impact Fee 805,553 Total of all Impact Fees $ 1,643,260 C. Non -Impact Fees: 1) Miami Dade W.A.S.A. "connection fees" $ 632,595 2) Building Permit Fee 219,878 3) Installation Energy Fee 109,939 4) Major Use Special Permit Application Fee 30,000 5) Miami -Dade County Code Compliance 27,500 6) Radon Gas Fee 5,497 7) Fire Plan Review Fee 10,444 8) Ground Cover Fee 466 9) Land Use/Zoning 628 10) Zoning Review for Building Permit Fee 60 11) Certificate of Occupancy Fee 250 12) Application Fee 35 Total of all Non -Impact Fees $ 1,037,292 Total of all Fees for Project $ 2,680,552 ® Source: City of Miami Planning, Building and Zoning Department, Miami Dade County Impact Fees record in connectiop lith 15 item PZ� cin i of Walter 1=aeman J J. — City Cleric 5 rccord in connects i .c;,n Pte- on ./, Waiter • • Oe Legal Description A�et' sero a x a.e ,x aw � d lawn "`•� ro Froe 3 5' �2 Surveyor's Notes y 5 4 / ' m Ij p �� m a. cwrtwr.e d xc ram wwr .n'crr 1 �' y neer a ..ro. m py d eco,.: roer.n. N YGYA 19MJ. i F`1E' o am Fuoe E.vI � i d II.fO (KPe, Yon ft xo. ' Itf; OurM loch 2 ], 19x. 7 li ) � ame. .,r se. ne.ieea M caF d r.,: eaza me 9 10 1/ b 3J 4�dY/lxi... aeero�.pw9ntri (zYaomY) .ror'GJo .°mzY— 1 !�L%i a a) na ... .ere wYu ..✓ese a aar e. aoeeew ew .eheme r1 ove a eaam ,�. rex aae e. res N.E. 18th Street J L ti Sk th oca on lo• fluty (err Fu>1 �� \ / IYPF as s,YSAo � IrF>< cera swaAn / � i � / Asx«cr Tree Data Fdxv xlx .ro aar 11 1 fY n9o:^f'n/r' X� II • � � II la' y I � I Symbols Legend ' rm slay •Gro a �Awr .a .e - I • I I I i� � .�' : s,mr.w.wnex, euorG 1 `•�j + '' �B° 9 chi S MOW o Fx RtXlt . 623 _ _ - Cu[aecq ZZ s R. Irs.7z• � s'�mwrca,`""` ® ' / I � o 0 A-- rjERV' 9nro (� ` : ,: _ ' - , Far rzoMOnelF°°°,n•. - aso - _ ® I ® � • I q71 y a I c• leas FFncF��-`�f,\YWUYUF`°'•r I 1 m Lrear Is- J R ASHM[T �\RRIyy�''5s I C N crrJr f Ase>ruel (a1, ws+aal Si�x¢r — .r'i� _ — (reFJxtl .uo Dere i s w Inv era ro er e rave tater tb �•vv a Geenoa .,e Faa1 An.rr<ne rar .m.e..,. �e„cen m:...e�., ....:,.., ,,,e . = eve: (a1 mve eM +mo r.n..•rleY he.:r a a eawe.:...F d eY d m..mr nasi rowN ansae , (6) etiae ew •.•w Ir•aey s,e oaneeey a.rmre s.e aaxe d %aa..,,.e+ a rn. nor aa.xF• w d en. ex. d a..Y..r. Crl ad u..an:, - we.q• o aaaee ,.ser. a• ern•r ere ar,aer d m. �•+e.ew.e r eo o.nsr .eYy r„oee d eti mr ne9sy llceb• a:,sm C� mee a«De aY m •rseeeroe•w .alrx amn naay e� s.onTy nwrrem,r n,v ro .nee o: d ,ere axe d arY >a...r: (d FaflD lc[ MO mt a..a :. >~+F rwtr �'Y.,ee.. s.e e�.r eY .sn,. s ..oviav aam„e,e (mx ane., ree aa+'a.s rMr r ur.dJ w d � CEJ ea ere. d eti .. r f0 a � eehen na,�.e le. me a•oaon d mere na•b •vre mer me navy thagrr a• eeImiq c,sse ,e�..ro o. a eM � �•M a a.e eeroe en w..e. 1e.4 w w ro em.eenn .ah �w es.:q ro a. •..� d lar P,cPnO: (d %we+ as qm ro ehe +,•?ce Fsc«y a ae:ae h � tsF,ww• a;.. a,ar won w aa.lr eerc me aw. a:e9 eo..e :, enc a:aloew .brro d w rrvud.n a Ib ob d les.i• (N m• sa+•y a .ee cc•roe :, aayrw o e ,o.e.• aeoe 9r hava,s aro oY fM FeeeYl Emr9r,n Yprop•Mee � atl Fen 7 iE• d mrr,wn /bo6q:' (.J err sdnee naeb cue rot M wrier ah• eeA•^+9 Orany b ad•Oe iVreei cpm a arp alMr IMmK �i tlnt ,n roes � CeerTq m w s..n ees arf � �a a a � � 11°1 ep'se eery r ub arc+.ee and (W mx eh..an., ...ry• .� a�mro.+ a, �,vv .an �+ amq.e M me wnn'ea GxrAeo a 9arry:y av rFanq a .d err ea•we, Alex -a 4° r,sm Ae..:aw;.. aoe,. ad � .al. a avr.�. neae smre err. xl William 0. High n b —HAalm public = ® rd in COnnBCfiO th On lZ ! D Waiter Foeman D sheet V q c Cit', Clerk 1 Of 1 �� • Io the public record in conneGfluil wth item )'2 I on !I Walter Foema n �" City Clerk 02/23/01 16:25 FAX - 10/25/99 C� ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE MIAMI CITY COMMISSION AMENDING PAGE NO. 23 OF THE ZONING HATLAS ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 11000, AS AMEN �LZONIN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, ARTICLE 4, SECTION 401, SCHEDULE OF DISTRICT REGULATIONS, BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION FROM R-4 MULTIFAMILY HIGH- DENSITY RESIDENTI.LL TO SD --6 CENTRAL COMMERCIAL -RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY X800 NORTH BAYS14ORE DRIVE AND 1825-1837 NORTHEAST 4" AVENUE, MIAMI, FLORID-%; CONTAINING A REPEALER PROVISION AND A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, 9' Ia 006/008 the Miami Zanixig Board, at its meeting of ,Iuly 26, 1999, item No. 3, fall,owing an advertised hearing, adapted ReSolution No. ZB-1999-0196, by a six to one (6-1) vote, recommending a change of zoning Classification, as hereinafter set forth; and Wafter careful consideration of HEREAS, the City Commission, this matter, deems it advisable and in the best interest of the general welfare of the City Of Miami and its 'n.habitants to grant thi.9 change ()f zoning classification as hereinafter set forth; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT QRDAINED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section. I. The Zoning Atlas of Ordinance No. 1.1.0001 as amended, the Zoning Ordirsance Of the City of Miami' Florida, Cut,,r;ist,-o into the puhlia rocord in connection with i:hm p2 L on Walter Foeman City Clerk r.r w 02/23/01 16:26 FAX . _ _ _ — 007/009 �1 LJ Page 23, Article 4, section 401, Schedule of District hereby amended by changing the zoning Regulations, is Residential to ,jassiiication from R-4 Multifamily High -Density SD -6 Central Commercial -Residential Districts for the property located at apprOximately 1800 North Bayshore Drive and 1825-1837 Northeast 4th Avenue, Miami, Florida, more particularly described as Lots 2, 3, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 12, Block 7, MxpAMAR, according to the plat, thereof, recorded in Plat Book 5, Page 4, of the Public 'Records of Miami -porde County, Florida. Secta.on 2. it is hereby found that this zoning classification cyzara.ge= (a) is in conformity with the adapted Miami. Comprehensive -Neighborhood Plan; (b) is not contrary to the established land use pattern; (G) will not create an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts; (d) is lot Out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the City; (e) will -not materially alter the population density pattern or increase or overtax the load on public facilities such as schools, utilities, streets. etc.; (f) is necessary due to changed or changing conditions; (g) will not adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood; (h) will not create or exCesgively increase traffic Submittoci into the public record in conne0on with iters tog -/ on Wolter Fdoman 2 7city Clerk 02/23/01 16:26 FAX • . 008/009 0 a congestion -Or ath.erwi.se. affect Public safety; Ei) will not create a drainage problem; (j) will nod seriously reduce light and air to add agent area; (k) will not adversely affect property value in the adjacent area; (1) will not be a deterrent to the improvement ar development of adj acent property in accord with existing regulations; and (m) will not constitute a grant of special gri.v"ege to an individual Owner so as to compromise the protection of the public welfare. Section 3. page No. 23 of the Zoning Atlas, made a part of Ordinance No. 12000, as ameiaded, the Zoni.r�g Ordinance Of the City of Miami, Florida, by reference and description in said Ordinance, is hereby amended to reflect the changes made n.acessary by this Amendment. Section 4. All. Ordinances or parts of ordinances insofar as they are inconsistent or in conflict with the provis'onns of this ordinance are hereby repealed. Section 5. if any section, part of section, paragraph, clause, phrase, or ward of this Ordinance is declared invalid, the remaining provisions of this Ordinance shall not be affected. Section 6. This ordinance shall be Dome effective simultaneously with its companion Comprehensive plan amendmezlt (ordinance No.) , which taken effect thirty-one (31) days Submitted into the pudic record in connection with itor"I on �-O `alter Foernan 3_ -- 7 2 (,Itv Clerk 02,23,41 16:27 FAX — i X1009/009 thereof pursuant to final reading and adoptaon after Section 153.3187 Fla. Stat. {SupP• 1998) .il da of PASSED ON FIRST READING BY TITLE ONLY this — Y October , 1999. AND FINAL READING BY TITLE ONLY PASSED AND ADOPTED ON gEOONp this1� 6tY�._ day of November, 1999, JOE CAFOLLO, MAYOR accordance with Miami Cade pec. 2 -Sr, since the I'JlaYcr did not lndlaats aPerolr�:l of In i +lded, said ie2',u1L" °r this legislation by signing it in tht� designated Placa Pro4 t�ecamss offeodve with tho efapss of t%Z-n, zUlty 's`. �n regarding same, mthcut the Mayor ex erk ATTEST: 1'n7ALTER J. VOEMAN CITY CLERK AS O ORIR+ °r ND COWECTNESS : y?4T : e J.j -B-98 ecified herein unless vetoed v This ordinance shall become effective as spe it Was ter3. ii= by the Mayor within ten days from the e � ah lI became peffect ve immediately the Mayar vetoes this Ordin.anthe City Commission or upon the effective upon override of the veto by �� public date stated herein, whichever is Later. C*Ub �L id ' �% record 1.2 Conjje tin with item � r loan �g.���1- 0i r r, C� P wafter Foernan v. .t. _ 1 6 �� City Clerk 0 i 0 0 THE 1800 CLUB_ MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT AUGUST 7, 2001 (m -..4 -Try SERMELLO-AJAMIL I & PARTNERS -INC ARCHITECTURE / ENGINEERING / LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE / INTERIOR DESIGN , BERMELLO, AJAMIL & PARTNERS INC. 2601 SOUTH SAYSHORE DRIVE, MIAMI, FL 33133 PK 13051 659.2050 FAX, 13051 859.9638 err � !P sky, p X43 � • � ��Vft' THE 1800 CLUB_ MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT AUGUST 7, 2001 (m SERMELLO-AJAMIL & PARTNERS -INC ARCHITECTURE / ENGINEERING / LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE / INTERIOR DESIGN BERMELLO, AJAMIL & PARTNERS INC. 2601 SOUTH SAYSHORE DRIVE, MIAMI, FL 33133 PK 13051 659.2050 FAX, 13051 859.9638 OWNER BCOM, INC. / 1800 CLUB LTD. 1201 BRICKELL AVE, SUITE 650, MIAMI, FL 33131 PH, 13051 375.0090 FAX, 13051 375.8183 0 Sub^ tied into the pubiic record it connection with item r--/ or, Waller Foeman City CIO,* 110 • CAM! OF OFFICE OF HE—:A,777N'7� L Sub m!""J -,'-o the public record in connection T H E 1 8 0 0 C13 1, W, itenj tO2-1 on Xilf nply approval Waiter Foemary 8 -DIMENSIONAL MODEL CONTEXT STUDY City Clerk 01 -IT, L Sub m!""J -,'-o the public record in connection T H E 1 8 0 0 C13 1, W, itenj tO2-1 on Xilf nply approval Waiter Foemary 8 -DIMENSIONAL MODEL CONTEXT STUDY City Clerk 01 • STE 1800 NOM ayshore Drive Miami, Florida LEGALDESDRIPTION Lots 8, 9, end 12, Block 7. A MIRAMAR,—onffrg to the Piet thereof w ra.road in Plat Book 5, at page 4 of me Public Redoms of Marro eCoumy, FlMkle. a ZONING SOS Amnilg olumdefrom RAW SDAWes appmved by to MIamI City Commission on 1111awas per Ortllnerwa No. 11859 entl ONlnans No. 11880. As Law Ona d lbe old 8, 1. Ronda. t (SDA Cantrd Comme,del Reaida,Nel DlaMda) titre zatrg ommanoe time sty m NBeml, FlorOa. PERNBITED USEfi til As dasalbatl try Ar6do 8. hoc. 608. Supp. No. i (SP8 Central Commamlel RaNtlentlel DlsMco) of tre ZONng Orne� dtne Cly st Mlaml, Florida, Bard uses ere, b41 trot limited b mumbmly dwNIInB untie, doss, retell establishments.establishments.restaurantsa.restaurantsentserlb ar. M cafes. DENSITY M. Penntbd: 500 antis/ acre 1.401 x 500= 720 unit- mac Proposes: 450 units (270 ants lees than the madmum allo-nJ) NET LOT AREA 82,769.0391 Alt Aai edea) •AwDrdig so eae area p None wbmMed by High Surveying 8 Mapping on 5/10101. GROSS LOT AREA As per Allds 25. Sen =, 9nws lot area N denrstl as Me nat let area. plus hat of the ad)olning steel righle-of v y and nirwy (90) feet of any= publo Wen epassudt as, but not Itmited to, para. 62,769.0D91 s' net Id area+North Bayshore Drive area + NE 18th Street area+alley arae+park = 117,892 sf FAR Mex. PertnMed: Ae per MUGe 8, Sec. 808.7, Supp. No. 1, the floor area for ell resWengal ossa may not exued seven -tw'.8M4 fmadmee 0e9mm let arae. 117,892 s(x 72=808.8224 of madman � Provided appmx. 635,864 of SETBACKS MIa Peskle f Aa 1 depthnW.m Supp.em 1, for allrr to.treat. s0yam-must bB a mlMmian of 5 bet 11 depth end s minimum requlremeMa for all IMerbr yeMe. East (North B y hon Drtra): 5 ft Sa.M (NE 18th Street): 5 ft was' (ell»'t Eft NoM (sdfaceN P.Pery): 0 ft PmAdad Fact (Nath ttayehore Dave):18'-Y So. (NE 160 Sheat): 5 It West ("Nyk Sft North (e —re Property): 0 OPEN SPACE Minimum reputed: As parartlde Addle 6, See. 606.8, Supp. No. 1, a minimum of one (1) square f"' of open space must be pawlded for —,VW(10) square feet of —d -dal Soon area. (68,273A d mh.) RequfmnProvped: 55,371 s' PARIONG Repub.d: As Far Anda 6, See 1W,1 1, the oftstretl parting requirements are as ldlewa: Fa dmNrg units, a minimum done (1) pakrg spec, and a maxMum dtwa (2) parking span ss per daeNMuat. FaoRb uwe..e minim ofons(1)perldw ap-pa for every eight hundred (800) of d floor arae and mmv exln otare (1) perdng apace for everyflw hundred (500) a lu he bet dtmr arae. For reaoaads, tiers is no malsem number d Per" spekxa, tine medmum of ons (1) spas for every one handred(100) square Net (groes toe area. Dwal6np unto: a5o -M D apapea rob Oros: 27.804 s'= W—.,.ss mh R.-M/Cafe: 0min TabL 485 apace min Proposed: 8]O epees, InduaNed 13 speose f,rN» physically divabled (st 2% of tool). OFFSTREET LDADING Required: As Ispuhad by Article 6, Sec. 608.10, Supp. No. 5.OR.trsat loading requiremanls are as provided In sectlona 822 anal P23. For bulMngs up to 500.000 at of gross building area. bur (4) bells 12' wide x 35' long are required. For bundings In e>¢ew of 500A00 -quare Net, are bell 1141111116 IoW 1. r.9wr d for every 500,000 prosesquarefeetdfl oMingarea. Grow 11MI11 area = approc 742.803 s' RegWral:5 berths ®12' wkb x 35long 115' high+ 1 terih 012'sloe x 55' lag Proposed. 5 bards C 12' wine x 35' long x W Mgh (Under Claw II Spsdal Parmft Slee Reduction) MAX BUILDING HEIGHT Allowed: """d ZONING DATA • THE 1800 CLUB PROPERTY ASSESMENT GROSS LOT AREA = 117,892 SF - - - - ED NET LOT AREA = 62,769.0991 SF — F.A.R. ALLOWABLE = 848,822.4 SF CITY OF MIAMI OFFICE OF HEARING BOARDS PLANS REVIEW Public works • Dde BV rZ' Ptannin§ - Date /.;�d1L Signature Signature above does not not ;trd irm the public o1 In cennectscn with Ong Vifter i=ceman City Glff�! 9 r' T 0 ae Legal Description ,e9 '. fPh a �. w�a �It can Y. d uuY.R P�e.a:,y h IM Pnf ktir -� 3 a ,�. Surveyors Notes 2 g m V =914—•A•E m b. mnlearo d Kr fern SfrvN .nan �' L n..NiYre M b Gr NY.m�. aN,.n 6 B JJ Preyerfy Ieh n F.E.YA Zone i£' M^15 o Bae £IeeQ fle.e':m d fD (KG 0. 919J Yep fh 8y GNq YaG Z. 99r 7 .J Bess' V../a.�.we.'uwo.e.e h Gb oI Incw.: eues^s m�e 9 to b 5) ('/ erryj .h'n F 1 Amartm Gf4 _ Lm4ro)) Nmrx?mmf /n W0. Me^!'s ib Na 15fi/O/SlG/f C. I < NleKee Wfe hnre 3 Mal, of Z.Ja PY arc MKKlN hereon. 12 IID bJ lfae � h�� ur'aa it Mme IM egnlvs an) eaeoma YJ Pnapab conlam I.N xra d 6Z— N. E. Z—N.E. 18th Street J Locaiion Sketch rsuua data G lo•,Ycfr (er Pup a r%YY fo' la• JJ o• a• I \ .un rev (¢cfvafl 41 i - isnao• FPu°r/ 6— PN.Y iREF fDGxp NA2 MD 05G Hll'i (errfifucl ®\ �\ ® srowr s-ntx YYanfc I �� I ® shncer sz-�ren rw...ae , 1 1 eA © A 1 O m. uw,alc �I �1 \ � vefaanc ear[x 1 I l - \ 7)� LL C11EIF Gilt fqt£ y 1 o xulEP wGE ISO Y ]]]I MGT(N fll9x � � I 1 \ O ]EGEfvgvf !/14IIY BJX / � Symbols Legend � L � 36* I I uNK � I ' \1 '_ '•I® � Lir q a- ;�' ®nn ® e e ee e� des crK,fae f 4- a C gte into the PUbHC I A mn r. ord connection -Ith Sheet VdaE42r Foeman city jaw J of 1 Tres De to f� '. $ w n..y m,ly ee eM rr'e. /nee, Iie �. �vv e.e sad ,un.emn Iih w�, ms;ae (el !M! IM aenY !M nadir a m acnmb Yvrey d d d fM red Gerr�"'Y' Pu+ vemwa..wNwv uN wro.b YywY ama.e MraM1RI rMr !M N!M - .: envy Prwab raM aeveaey a6evin erN bola d ' h ro !M nei anPeKY m d fM iah d fM aeW: () rhN eM .SM vreY em PreNaC nrNa fM dreefn+ mtl cmlyd d � vNa4Ya/ /raP m roled nvwY mn0e N Va reY PRPaIY YWN OmabO II rf;Kcr ccwrxK �(� fhd Ihere m ro aw! wnh � even mWab Gna v +onvq mhicfion Gxe in Nhef m N IM nets d Nu eu�: (eJ lha +uwY IreOenY pe+Yrlm mN acanr a :eb+e a .ecvaN .®r+ra (KN wwm m me Yoraee nY reevanwe) m d M (enfrrar[1 finefs ar. Y� sur�Yr (IJ d uiib reei:'ee Id YY e➢aeai+r d fKarcePrWerrY rYM. mfa fM P^+Oab'fM e.m. M,mrro p� M' Pea fha9h pnwle aeq ro ro a wilt emrmm6 eaevq 0 (W mea en0 y@ fo !M » � PT+MIYe Po^eee q nbrM 9 Mere 6;w nPen eIYG fM p4mr1Y mLli fM fo+r artl M6vlM Mnb d M mw�IdrYE aY ]M G4' N Y;mi (n) fM PleOagr ie riN acvlan m aw Jesgnele0 m o +oeNe/ faeJ I,, nmew�o sten r„ eM f.mN P�aaca Yeroye.+m nym2Y. av .ae a zw x' d PYaewn /aee+v: f•1 en. � a'roe+b am m! amxe an oS/oni+9 Preeerb lar 6ovroge, igrea yea a mry ofM. PaPea' (!) ant fM brq m emcnDee m fM vwy Jm rol eovGmtr m SYad n.e6:ecn d froe aea —_ ..rem m.+b a err e.sbrm,; av (y fM! w .:fn. ver .m Preaeree a n : IM eriehq cavi d precfae /a 4wre gnro,we eerofN ey IM .4namr fiep2ee m Suwyuq en0 r/um:q m .ea m f:Mpla 6,FN-e. ' far.lP MamefmfMe fnee, erN nenrPGm 1r eY gp4vge /loriee tote bee William O. High P,Nmma lav sa..Ya na eGJz areh of /raven , 6— PN.Y iREF fDGxp NA2 MD 05G Hll'i (errfifucl ®\ �\ ® srowr s-ntx YYanfc I �� I ® shncer sz-�ren rw...ae , 1 1 eA © A 1 O m. uw,alc �I �1 \ � vefaanc ear[x 1 I l - \ 7)� LL C11EIF Gilt fqt£ y 1 o xulEP wGE ISO Y ]]]I MGT(N fll9x � � I 1 \ O ]EGEfvgvf !/14IIY BJX / � Symbols Legend � L � 36* I I uNK � I ' \1 '_ '•I® � Lir q a- ;�' ®nn ® e e ee e� des crK,fae f 4- a C gte into the PUbHC I A mn r. ord connection -Ith Sheet VdaE42r Foeman city jaw J of 1 tisk g7F�R,,:3 P �- II rf;Kcr ccwrxK R 6— PN.Y iREF fDGxp NA2 MD 05G Hll'i (errfifucl ®\ �\ ® srowr s-ntx YYanfc I �� I ® shncer sz-�ren rw...ae , 1 1 eA © A 1 O m. uw,alc �I �1 \ � vefaanc ear[x 1 I l - \ 7)� LL C11EIF Gilt fqt£ y 1 o xulEP wGE ISO Y ]]]I MGT(N fll9x � � I 1 \ O ]EGEfvgvf !/14IIY BJX / � Symbols Legend � L � 36* I I uNK � I ' \1 '_ '•I® � Lir q a- ;�' ®nn ® e e ee e� des crK,fae f 4- a C gte into the PUbHC I A mn r. ord connection -Ith Sheet VdaE42r Foeman city jaw J of 1 • • Li 0 sL,b7n!;- r ;"� the public — GIT n -F iVm9AM on xr'sth y.N_o �-J- ®i MCE OF FARING r item on p waiter Foeman City Clerk t ,'> - woes Date E.r_ ,�► THE 1 800 CLU B Pi t .anni g - Date a venTr°�asa c` SITE PLAN SCALE. T - 20'-0' nc.i Y approval Signature abovE ti:rs 1• • ,•- HANDICA N • • i I 1� 4' Imo, NORTH 3AVSHORE DRIVE �--� n7� n I o IkrHtyftmE. .'_.._ -r a pec ,vr --------------- - _ e v s 8'-6" TYPICAL TYPICAL STALL CAL HANDICAP STALL �/ " CONC. CUPO PAVER IINR/CONQiF1E SI�EWN.K \ I T6,D1115 `�I �f ea rc ra I - =' _�-j c-±= caeawcrEo sueawnoE e I e � o s m. v IIJ �� CURB DETAIL AT STREET I l I p11 1 yr gig _ - >r j mF - • T �LMEROCK 615E d^ ^e VEMQ�e � d� -e • OEfNL ON CmL - cOMa�ctEp suecw�E _ — CURB DETAIL AT LANDSCAPING I i -1 � o ••• I �I �, fl � I !' 1 I � I _ I I I _¢ ,nrr f�OTO e, nv Wil/EPo5 tt. CIXUC. WHEEL SiaF 7—T o7— aElnFo cmuc. vosr,wsans -, I .'-- .. I I N he ubli '"t ONC. WHEEL STOP DETAIL N A OFFICE OF HEARW- -3n vy,� t:;ord iii wit PLANS s i V4`aiter Seeman City Clerk_ THE 1 X 0 0 CLUB cr.s Dete� ._ - - a w,n�ee»c SITE PLAN SCALE. T • 20'-01 ry Dz} Flanri g Date —,\( / s v- G P Ign re a ve Does , m;,ly p v , 0 IS 1• L II I * • • ..III m � I I Q Er 'll § b 1 „I - e l e o e e e� • I I I 1 J I I n' � 1 - m „p ,2 i ,9 ,d ,6 i 6 v] 1B 19 �, �°e epee e°e e°eleeej 20 2t 23 2 •: I I Ic 25 28 2] 26 29 30 3, 32 33 I 36 3fa" 3] 36 � o ! EL t � I _ ss d0 dt 62 d3 dd d5 ifi 4] d8 d9 $§ 51 52 53 S4 OPEN TO j N6Low sn sr O . CG'Ct'}!v E G "Lril �'I:h CIT r•- -F ����W kQ>, er'! �i.i!-o YZl on I� P P`ss �EE CN krnan lI^ ,eP2f r(? Ci y Clerk P �. .. � . ®► THE 1 800 CLUB .c3�_� -- Ply nin Daze I Euc P.NTi,9N9 FIRST FLOOR PLAN ILOBBYI SCALE. T N 18'-O• gy; $I�nBtllfO abov G�90GGv `� aces nv, I:a:y approval ,V Ma -1 sF n r o r o.wF,�G ije I II OF iGi5R tir:e ae:+`�i PLMS RF.Vi •1V L o e e e • e GI -L _ 1 � �y c G ZWIV -Date -(-0 .., e e eye a �cj a e�e a gy, m dat i ege. F c m, G PillI I � EL :3,.0 Signa`u � Y appruvw CITY OF MIAMI �o pub'io F E F HEAR' >�b�„_,u Ertto t i O O t��t���.� BOARDS 'M 0 i O .. Itfm PL-tl_c� I °t n Fubilc works ate �(kS.cSr Fc�erna City Clerk By: Pill ®, THE 1800 CLUB Plaming---- 0 Signature above does not imply ap I anniriEea m` OFFICE FLOORS 2&3 SCALE. T • 16'-0' �n10o 4G� rz ■ K, 19 °c the public co ord 0 nnec °lon with item Y2•L0-1 Q Ll -01 Wager FoemW City Cierk THE 1800 CLUB TOWNHOUSE FLOORS 4.8 SCALE. 1' • 18'-0' 0 CiTy F�a�'ii3 07 4r s^ � � OFFICE of ��EARtN r E`-3 �¢` E %N r Eo� ` sr . Gate e- i ni 8 Dale S� irtC °, l�JidC� i:errson Walter Feernan City Cleric 8 >4RTNFRS pNL� s I o r 9 0 lea • • xs w, o o 0 0 40 4 ss CK-) g+ OFFICE 3 Ems' ' v,N - - J S �0 � Ga.a - - Data -- TH E 1 8 0 0 C L U B aeO- y ,_ ; �ii ''!Lt POOL DECK - 9TH FLOOR SCALE, 1' • 78'-0' �gignature above dues arc. Ply aPProvai 1 L 1• 10 � oFI=jCE Sub - d .^.te the public � wry �`� ,Apr.:3 o Ion vdth SCC r� r 1 a r:crs 0 �. item iz f o.: i--1=.— S � Wafter Fooman v, City Cleric s • Lata r iannin Date ®, TH E 18 0 0 C L U B E�r—Signature abvc s P.—rrhaeiwci 10TH FLOOR SCALE, 1' • 16'-0' 0 Submlliasd Into the public record In connect!on with KGM el -I on f.2 -It -01 L Waiter Feeman G,ty Clerk 0 THE 1800CLU8 TYPICAL RESIDENTIAL FLOORS 11-35 SCALE, 11 - 16'-0' ARDS 0\ BY.- .�ff—y I = • • A FW I ®FFiL`ig�Fal p� 5� (� iii13 Y! l K6� the ubliC f SeF-Ts J �Y record vC^:� iyon With E 0 p it2RIn?e der itoeman Cito; Clerk ,—„ — THE 1800 C GW4(l ate . BY: ®, —41;dture E!Xs_ . ua, ply -approval O TYPICAL RESIDENTIAL FLOORS 36-40 SCALE, 11 • 16'-0• I e' 2 -