Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
R-01-1234
J-01-975 10/29/01 L7 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE MIAMI CITY COMMISSION, WITH ATTACHMENTS, APPROVING WITH CONDITIONS, A MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT PURSUANT TO ARTICLES 5, 13 AND 17 OF ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 11000, FOR THE ROYAL BAY ESTATES PROJECT, A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PROJECT TO BE LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY 1641 SOUTH BAYSHORE DRIVE AND 1640 MICANOPY AVENUE, MIAMI, FLORIDA, TO BE COMPRISED OF THREE DETACHED SINGLE FAMILY HOMES; DIRECTING TRANSMITTAL OF THE HEREIN RESOLUTION; MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATING CONCLUSIONS OF LAW; PROVIDING FOR BINDING EFFECT; CONTAINING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, on May 7, 2001, George Daviglus and the Royal Bay Group, LLC. (hereinafter referred to as "APPLICANT"), submitted a complete Application, AS AMENDED ON September 7, 2001, for Major Use Special Permit for the Royal Bay Estates Project (hereinafter referred to as "PROJECT") pursuant to Articles 5, 13 and 17 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, for the properties located at approximately 1641 South Bayshore Drive and 1640 Micanopy Avenue, Miami, Florida, as .legally CITY CO MIMS1 , NEr-TING described in "Exhibit B" and "Exhibit A," attached and incorporated; and WHEREAS, development of the PROJECT requires the issuance of a Major Use Special Permit pursuant to Article 17 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended; and WHEREAS, the Large Scale Development Committee met to consider the proposed PROJECT and offer its input; and WHEREAS, the APPLICANT has modified the proposed PROJECT to address the expressed technical concerns raised at said Large Scale Development Committee meeting; and WHEREAS, the Urban Development Review Board met on May 16, 2001, to consider the proposed PROJECT and recommended approval; and WHEREAS, the Historic and Environmental Preservation Board (HEPB), met on May 15, 2001, to consider the proposed PROJECT and recommended approval (of the modified plan), with conditions as specified in the Development Order, attached and incorporated as "Exhibit A;" and Page 2 of 9 �I-12��� 0 WHEREAS, the Historic and Environmental Preservation Board (HEPB), met on October 9, 2001, to consider the proposed modifications to the PROJECT and recommended approval (of the modified plan), with further modifications as proffered on the record and subject to conditions as specified in the Development Order, attached and incorporated as "Exhibit A;" WHEREAS, the Miami Planning Advisory Board, at its meeting held on October 17, 2001, Item No. 1, following an advertised public hearing, adopted Resolution No. PAB-8401 by a vote of six to one (6-1), RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of the Major Use Special Permit Development Order as attached and incorporated; and WHEREAS, the City Commission deems it advisable and in the best interest of the general welfare of the City of Miami to issue a Major Use Special Permit Development Order as hereinafter set forth; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. The recitals and findings contained in the Preamble to this Resolution are adopted by reference and incorporated as if fully set forth in this Section. Page 3 of 9 • i Section 2. A Major Use Special Permit Development Order, attached and incorporated as "Exhibit A," is approved subject to the conditions specified in the Development Order, per Article 17 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, for the PROJECT to be developed by the APPLICANT, at approximately 1641 South Bayshore Drive and 1640 Micanopy Avenue, Miami, Florida, more particularly described on "Exhibit B," attached and incorporated. Section 3. The PROJECT is approved as a Planned Unit Development for the construction of three detached single family residences. Section 4. The Major Use Special Permit Application for the PROJECT also encompasses the lower ranking Special Permits as set forth in the Development Order ("Exhibit A"). Section 5. The findings of fact set forth below are made with respect to the subject PROJECT: a. The PROJECT is in conformity with the adopted Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000, as amended. Page 4 of 9 0 E b. The PROJECT is in accord with the R-1/SD-3/SD- 18/SD-18.1 Zoning classifications of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended. C. Pursuant to Section 1305 of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, the specific site plan aspects of the PROJECT, i.e., ingress and egress, parking, signs and lighting, utilities, drainage, preservation of natural features and control of potentially adverse effects generally, have been considered and will be further considered administratively during the process of issuing a building permit and a certificate of occupancy. d. The PROJECT is expected to cost approximately $2.4 million, and to employ approximately 15 workers during construction (FTE -Full Time Employees); the PROJECT will also result in the creation of approximately 2 permanent new jobs. The PROJECT will generate approximately $171,000 annually in tax revenues to local units of government (2001 dollars). e. The City Commission further finds that: Page 5 of 9 9 0 (1) the PROJECT will have a favorable impact on the economy of the City; (2) the PROJECT will efficiently use public transportation facilities; (3) any potentially adverse effects of the PROJECT will be mitigated through compliance with the conditions of this Major Use Special Permit; (4) the PROJECT will favorably affect the need for people to find adequate housing reasonably accessible to their places of employment; (5) the PROJECT will efficiently use necessary public facilities; (6) the PROJECT will not negatively impact the environment and natural resources of the City; (7) the PROJECT will not adversely affect living conditions in the neighborhood; (8) the PROJECT will not adversely affect public safety; (9) based on the record presented and evidence presented, the public welfare will be served by the PROJECT; and Page 6 of 9 J ~ _.23 (10) any potentially adverse effects of the PROJECT arising from safety and security, fire protection and life safety, solid waste, heritage conservation, trees, shoreline development, minority participation and employment, and minority contractor/subcontractor participation will be mitigated through compliance with the conditions of this Major Use Special Permit. Section 6. The Major Use Special Permit, as approved and amended, shall be binding upon the APPLICANT and any successors in interest. Section 7. The application for Major Use Special. Permit, which was submitted on May 7, 2001, as modified on September 7, 2001, and on file with the Department of Planning and Zoning of the City of Miami, Florida, shall be relied upon generally for administrative interpretations and is incorporated by reference. Section 8. The City Manager is directed to instruct the Director of the Department of Planning and Zoning to transmit a copy of this Resolution and attachment to the developers: Page 7 of 9 b 4 , 0 0 Adrienne Pardo, Esq. on behalf of George Daviglus and the Royal Bay group, LLC., 1221 Brickell Avenue, Miami, Fl. 33131. Section 9. The Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law are made with respect to the PROJECT as described in the Development Order ("Exhibit All) for the PROJECT, attached and incorporated. Section 10. The Major Use Special Permit Development Order for the PROJECT ("Exhibit A") is granted and issued. Section 11. In the event that any portion or section of this Resolution or the Development Order ("Exhibit A") is determined to be invalid, illegal, or unconstitutional by a court or agency of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall in no manner affect the remaining portions of this Resolution or Development Order ("Exhibit A") which shall remain in full force and effect. Section 12. The provisions approved for this Major Use Special Permit, as approved, shall commence and become operative thirty (30) days after the adoption of the herein Resolution. Page 8 of 9 Section 13. This Mayor Use Special Permit, as approved, shall expire two (2) years from its commencement and operative date. Section 14. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its adoption and signature of the Mayor.lj PASSED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of ATTEST: November, 2001. JOE CAROLLO, MAYOR hl k':Gi'.gl'0ance wit!) �,�i';�'I(" !"rr('�', �jl"„ "� �,I -f �a :e nR�� r1 r -i��n ;inti r-•.' f rergarc ffiq ;ureic:, withotii lrr I u ; '� n cir J . rXjj -City Clerk WALTER J. F'OEMAN CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: I JAf 'Ir. A t'/o I/ dirL JANDRO VILA LLO C Y ATTORNEY W5794:GMM:dd 1.� If the Mayor does not sign this Resolution, it shall become effective at the end of ten calendar days from the date it was passed and adopted. If the Mayor vetoes this Resolution, it shall become effective immediately upon override of the veto by the City Commission. Page 9 of 9 : "1.23L "EXHIBIT A" ATTACHMENT TO RESOLUTION NO. DATE: ROYAL BAY ESTATES PROJECT MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT DEVELOPMENT ORDER Let it be known that pursuant to Articles 5, 13 and 17 of Ordinance No. 11000, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended (the "Zoning Ordinance"), the Commission of the City of Miami, Florida, has considered in a public hearing, the issuance of a Major Use Special Permit for the Royal Bay Estates Project (hereinafter referred to as the "PROJECT") to be located at approximately 1641 South Bayshore Drive and 1640 Micanopy Avenue, Miami, Florida (see legal description on "Exhibit B," attached and incorporated), is subject to any dedications, limitations, restrictions, reservations or easements of record. After due consideration of the recommendations of the Historic and Environmental Preservation Board, and the Planning Advisory Board and after due consideration of the consistency of this proposed development with the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan, the City Commission has approved the PROJECT, 0 0 and subject to the following conditions approves the Major Use Special Permit and issues this Permit: FINDINGS OF FACT PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The proposed PROJECT is a residential Planned Unit Development to be located at approximately 1641 South Bayshore Drive and 1640 Micanopy Avenue, Miami, Florida. The PROJECT is located on a gross lot area of approximately 1.27 acres and a net lot area of approximately 1.08 acres of land (more specifically described on "Exhibit B," incorporated herein by reference). The remainder of the PROJECT's Data Sheet is attached and incorporated as "Exhibit C." The proposed PROJECT will consist of three detached single- family homes. The ownership, operation and maintenance of common areas and facilities will be by the property owner or (in the case of the property being converted to condominiums) a mandatory property owner association in perpetuity pursuant to a recorded Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions. The Major Use Special Permit Application for the PROJECT also encompasses the following lower ranking Special Permits: Page 2 of 10 CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT to permit staging and parking during construction (to be approved prior to obtaining a building permit from the Department of Planning and Zoning); CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 925.3.8, to allow development/construction/ rental signage; CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 920.1, to allow a construction trailer; MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 5 for a Planned Unit Development (PUD); PER CITY CODE, Chapter 36, Construction Equipment, request for waiver from the City Commission of noise ordinance during construction; PER CITY CODE, Section 23-5(a), request of a Certificate of Appropriateness for ground disturbing activity in an Archeological Conservation Area; PER CITY CODE, Chapter 17, request for Certificate of approval for tree removal and relocation within an Environmental Preservation District and construction along a Scenic Transportation Corridor. Pursuant to Articles 13 and 17 of the Zoning Ordinance, approval of the requested Major Use Special. Permit shall be considered sufficient for the subordinate permits requested and referenced above as well as any other special approvals required Page 3 of 10 0 0 by the City which may be required to carry out the requested plans. The PROJECT shall be constructed substantially in accordance with plans and design schematics on file prepared by Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, dated September 2001; the landscape plan shall be implemented substantially in accordance with plans and design schematics on file prepared by Elizabeth Newland with Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, dated September 2001; said design and landscape plans may be permitted to be modified only to the extent necessary to comply with the conditions for approval imposed herein; all modifications shall be subject to the review and approval of the Director of the Department of Planning and Zoning prior to the issuance of any building permits. The PROJECT conforms to the requirements of the R-1/SD- 3/SD-18/SD-18.1 Zoning District, as contained in the Zoning Ordinance, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended. The existing comprehensive plan future land use designation on the subject property allows the proposed residential use. CONDITIONS THE APPLICANT, ITS SUCCESSORS, AND/OR ASSIGNS, JOINTLY OR SEVERALLY, PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF ANY BUILDING PERMITS, SHALL COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING: Page 4 of 10 0 0 1. Meet all applicable building codes, land development regulations, ordinances and other laws. 2. Pay all applicable fees due prior to the issuance of a building permit. 3. Allow the Miami Police Department to conduct a security survey, at the option of the Department, and to make recommendations concerning security measures and systems; further submit a report to the Department of Planning and Zoning, prior to commencement of construction, demonstrating how the Police Department recommendations, if any, have been incorporated into the PROJECT security and construction plans, or demonstrate to the Director of the Department of Planning and Zoning why such recommendations are impractical. 4. Obtain approval from, or provide a letter from the Department of Fire -Rescue indicating APPLICANT'S coordination with members of the Fire Plan Review Section at the Department of Fire -Rescue in the review of the scope of the PROJECT, owner responsibility, building development process and review procedures, as well as specific requirements for fire protection and life safety systems, exiting, vehicular access and water supply. 5. obtain approval from, or provide a letter of assurance from the Department of Solid Waste that the PROJECT has addressed all concerns of the said Department prior to the obtainment of a shell permit. Page 5 of 10 10iW-I;? '�3 1: 0 0 6. Prepare a Minority Participation and Employment Plan (including a Contractor/ Subcontractor Participation Plan) to be submitted to the City's Director of Equal Employment Opportunity for review and comments, with the understanding that the APPLICANT must use its best efforts to follow the provisions of the City's Minority/Women Business Affairs and Procurement Program as a guide. 7. Record the following in the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida, prior to the issuance of a shell permit: (a) a Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions providing that the ownership, operation and maintenance of all common areas and facilities will be by the property owner or a mandatory property owner association in perpetuity; (b) a certified copy of the Development Order specifying that the Development Order runs with the land and is binding on the APPLICANT, its successors, and assigns, jointly or severally. 8. Prior to the issuance of a shell permit, demonstrate to the City that the PROJECT has completed its application for condominium requirements and submitted such to the State of Florida. 9. The Department of Public Works shall be provided with plans for proposed sidewalk and swale area improvements for its review and approval prior to the issuance of a building permit. 10. Provide the Department of Planning and Zoning with a temporary parking plan, including an operational plan, which addresses construction employee parking during the Page 6 of 10 0 • construction period, said plan shall be subject to the review and approval by the Department of Planning and Zoning prior to the issuance of any building permits and shall be enforced during construction activity. 11. The APPLICANT shall retain the services of an archeological consultant who will be responsible for Conducting archeological monitoring of all ground disturbing activity as well as the subsequent recovery of artifacts. Said consultant shall work at the direction of the Miami -Dade County Archeologist and shall provide reports to both that office and to the City. 12. The APPLICANT shall submit final design details, as well as final landscape and lighting plan, to the Director of the Department of Planning and Zoning for review and approval, prior to the issuance of a building permit. 13. Prior to the issuance of a shell permit for the first residence, the APPLICANT shall submit an interim plan, including a landscape plan, which addresses design details for the land occupying the remaining residences in the event that the future homes are not developed, said plan shall include a proposed timetable and shall be subject to review and approval by the Director of the Department of Planning and Zoning. 1,�. The applicant shall replace the row of royal palms along South Bayshore Drive with a more informal design. Page 7 of 10 i 15. The applicant shall ensure that the proposed shade trees do not completely block the view of house from South Bayshore Drive. 16. Pursuant to the Historic and Environmental Preservation Board, tree number 21 (as specified in the tree survey on file) shall not be relocated in order to move the proposed swimming pool away from the north property line. THE CITY SHALL: Establish the operative date of this Permit as being thirty (30) days from the date of its issuance; the issuance date shall constitute the commencement of the thirty (30) day period to appeal from the provisions of the Permit. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW The PROSECT, proposed by the APPLICANT, complies with the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000, is consistent with the orderly development and goals of the City of Miami, and complies with local land development regulations and further, pursuant to Section 1703 of the Zoning Ordinance: (1) the PROJECT will have a favorable impact on the economy of the City; and Page 8 of 10 1p` "_rk , (2) the PROJECT will efficiently use public transportation facilities; and (3) the PROJECT will favorably affect the need for people to find adequate housing reasonably accessible to their places of employment; and (4) the PROJECT will efficiently use necessary public facilities; and (5) the PROJECT will not negatively impact the environment and natural resources of the City; and (6) the PROJECT will not adversely affect public safety; and (7) the public welfare will be served by the PROJECT; and (8) any potentially adverse effects of the PROJECT will be mitigated through conditions of this Major Use Special Permit. The proposed development does not unreasonably interfere with the achievement of the objectives of the adopted State Land Development Plan applicable to the City of Miami. Pursuant to Section 1305 of the Zoning Ordinance, the specific site plan aspects of the PROJECT i.e., ingress and egress, offstreet parking and loading, refuse and service areas, signs and lighting, utilities, drainage and control of Page 9 of 10 . _ -I 2d 34 0 0 potentially adverse effects generally have been considered and will be further considered administratively during the process of issuing individual building permits and certificates of occupancy. Page 10 of 10 0 "EXHIBIT B" Lot 1 and 4, PRICE TERRACE, according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in the Plat Book 82 at Page 46,of the Public Records of Miami Dade County, Florida. _-1234 • EXHIBIT "C" PROJECT CRITERIA - ZONING / SETBACKS / OVERVIEW REQUIRED/ALLOLUABLE ;'.; '' PROVIDED ZONING DISTRICT FRI , 5D-18.1, 5D-3 E3A5E F,A,R, .60 .3 NET LOT AREA 47,250 S.F. l i.08 4CRE5) NET LOT DIMENSIONS 135'-0' X 3501-0' 6R055 LOT AREA (G,L.A,) 55,314.5 5.F. (1.27 ACRES) GREEN SPACE (0.15 x G.L.A.) 5,291 5F, 24,955 5F. (45% BUILDING FOOTPRINT (0.40 x G.L.A.) 22,126 S.F. T SF. 118% GR055 F.A.R. (0.00 x Cs.L.A.) 33,189 5.F. 14,884 5.F. (30% F.U.D. BONU5 (0.20 x G.L.A.) 11,063 5.F. SETBAGK5 REQUI,PROVIDED: ,; RED • 5OUT14 BAYSNORE DRIVE 10'-0' (FRONT YARD 5ETBACK) 105'-10' • MICANOPY 20'-0' (FRONT YARD SETBACK) 20'-3' MIN. • RLAP 20'-0' (REAR YARD SETBACK) NOT APPLIGAE1-F INTERIOR SIDES 5'-0' (SIDE YARD SETBACK) 5' 3' TO 6'-4' ' 5TFREET 51DES NOT AF'F L{ CABLE NOT APDL€GAE51. E i. IMAX. ALLOWED i; /:/;'� , PROVIDED OVERALL BUILDING STRUCTURE (TO TOP OF ROOF SLAB OR AVERAGE 5LOPED ROOF) 25' FROM FLOOD LEVEL OR AVERAGE 51DEW4LK ELEvATION, W"ICNEVER 15 I IIGWER. 25'-0' PROGRAM , Cs.SF./ PROJECT OVERVIEW X5.2'14 FOOL AREA 5.F. FARK7NG SURFACE 4,126 S.F. 5UILDING FOOTPRINT AREA 9,�ra� SF. OF'EN 5PACE 24955 SF CIRCULATION 3,128 S.F. 6.5P. PROJECT TOTAL 41 250 G.5.F. UNIT MIX 5 5EDR00M5) 0 BAT�-IROONS MODELS 'A' 1 '13' 2 UN175 o BEDROOMS / '1.5 BATNROOM5 MODELS 'G' I UNIT (339.) TOTAL 3 UNITS (100%) H:iARCFR20096,1031SD7 010806-3-UNITS1Siie',Sk-I.dwg, 09104/2001 04.3j:20 PMI, 1.459 741 PROJECT CRITERIA - FAR / PROGRAM BREAKDOWN F.A.R. BR�AKDOUJN /' "' PROCsRAM f ARKfNCs :' 'FAR '!NON - PAR./, / ; GRO55 GROUND FLOOR RE511DENT14L 1,415 5F. 8,292 5F. 9,�C 1 G,5F, 2nd. FLOOR RESIDENTIAL 0,592 5F. /0,592 G.SF, 3 1 TOTAL 1 ,475 5.F. 44,884 5.F. 16,359 Q.S.F. P FKINCz ' / MIN. SPACES REQ'D. ' "/'" PROVIDE© RESIDENTIAL U5E5 3 (5 - /0 5EDROONS/1-INfT) (2 PER UNIT) C 5PACE5 TOTAL PARKING Ca h SPACES • • PZ -3 APPLICANT HEARING DATE REQUEST/LOCATION LEGAL DESCRIPTION PLANNING FACT SHEET Adrienne Pardo, Esq.for George Daveglus (owner) and Royal Bay Group, LLC (contract purchaser). October 17, 2001 Approximately 1641 South Bayshore Drive and 1640 Micanopy. Complete legal description on file with the Hearing Boards Office. PETITION Consideration of approving a Major Use Special Permit for the Royal Bay Estates Project located at approximately 1641 South Bayshore Drive and 1640 Micanopy in order to allow a planned unit development project consisting of three (3) single family homes. PLANNING RECOMMENDATION BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS Approval with conditions. See attached for background and analysis. PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD Recommended Approval. with Conditions CITY COMMISSION N/A .40 APPLICATION NUMBER 01-040 VOTE: 6-1 item #1 CITY OF MIAMI • PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT 444 SW 2ND AVENUE, 3RD FLOOR • MIAMI, FLORIDA, 33130 PHONE (305} 4i6 -14D0 _................_.._..._... .. .. _...._....�..._............._. �_._.-.............. ..: _...�............. _...__�....,.......,_......._........,....�.....__....,.�........_. Page 1 10/9/2001 :i-1234 Analysis for Major Use Special Permit for the Royal Bay Estates Project located at CASE NO. 2001-040 Pursuant to Ordinance 11000, as amended, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, the subject proposal for the Royal Bay Estates Project has been reviewed to allow a Major Use Special Permit for a Planned Unit Development project. Per City Code, Chapter 23, Certificate of Appropriateness for ground disturbing activity in an archeological conservation area Per City Code, Chapter 17, Certificate of Approval for development in an Envi- ronmental Preservation District and along a Scenic Transportation Corridor. Pursuant to Articles 13 and 17 of Zoning Ordinance 11000, approval of the requested Ma- jor Use Special Permit shall be considered sufficient for the subordinate permits required as well as any other special approvals required by the City which may be required to carry out the requested plans. The requested Special Permit is for the purpose of allowing a Planned Unit Development consisting of 3 detached single-family residential units for the property located at ap- proximately 1641 South Bayshore Drive and 1640 Micanopy Avenue in the Coconut Grove area (see attached legal description, location maps and aerial photographs for exact property boundaries). In determining the appropriateness of the proposed residential project, the Planning and Zoning Department has referred this project to the Large Scale Development Committee (LSDC), the City of Miami Preservation Officer, the Historic and Envi- ronmental Preservation Board (HEPB), and the Urban Development Review Board (DDRB) for additional input and recommendations; the following findings have been made: • It is found that the project was reviewed by the Large Scale Development Committee and has been modified to address the expressed technical concerns raised at said Large Scale Development Committee meeting; however, additional design details re- lated to sidewalk and swale area improvements will have to be submitted at the time of permitting. • It is found that the UDRB has recommended approval of the proposed project pursu- ant to a public meeting held on May 16, 2001. The project has since been modified to reflect only 3 (versus 4) single family homes. J:j-124 • The subject property is located within an Environmental Preservation District (EPD) and along the South Bayshore Drive Scenic Transportation Corridor. Only the larger lot abutting South Bayshore Drive is an EPD, although the standards for tree removal are the same on both parcels; this required a referral to the HEPB. • It is found that the HEPB has recommended approval of the proposed project pursuant to a public meeting held on May 15, 2001, and further recommended approval with conditions for the modified plans at a public meeting held on October 9, 2001. The condition for approval was that tree #21 (as specified on the tree survey on file) not be relocated in order to move the proposed swimming pool away from the north property line; the Board recommended that the plans submitted be built as submitted and not altered with respect to said tree. This portion of the South Bayshore Drive Scenic Transportation Corridor is character- ized by exposed sections of the natural oolitic limestone outcropping (or bluff), in- formal landscaping and low walls adjacent to South Bayshore Drive. These walls are often constructed of oolitic limestone or coral rock. The top of the bluff is typically eight to twelve feet higher in elevation than the street and is characterized by wide- open expanses of lawn with native trees and houses set back more than 100' from the street. These houses provide the visual, as well as legal, boundaries of the scenic cor- ridor. • The subject property contains an exposed portion of the bluff, which is interspersed in places with a low coral rock wall, planter and columns that flank the driveway. At the top of the bluff are strangler figs and other native trees. The existing house is set back 132' from the street. A variety of trees, both native and non-native, cover the prop- erty. • The Preservation Officer recommended that the HEPB recommend to the City Com- mission approval of the application for a Certificate of Approval as a part of a Major Use Special Permit because the plans comply with Section 17-34 (1) and Section 17- 36 (5) of the Miami City Code, based upon the findings stated above. • It is found that the applicant has modified the proposed development program to eliminate units (the original request had 6 units, then reduced to 4 and now remains at 3) which results in a better overall plan for the subject property and alleviates the con- cerns raised by the HEPB and staff. • It is found that the City of Miami Preservation Officer reviewed the project and that a recommendation was made that archeological monitoring be conducted in the manner set forth in the condition described below. Ji -1234 C • • It is found that the Planning and Zoning Department is in concurrence with these comments and will require compliance with the above referenced conditions prior to the issuance of any building permits for the proposed project. It is found that with respect to all additional criteria as specified in Section 1305 of Zoning Ordinance 11000, the proposal has been reviewed and found to be adequate. Based on these findings, the Planning and Zoning Department is recommending approval of the requested Development Project with the following conditions: 1. The approval of this Major Use Special Permit shall be subject to the recorda- tion of the following documents prior to the issuance of any building permits for the proposed project: a. Unity of Title or covenant in lieu thereof providing that the ownership, operation and maintenance of all common areas and facilities will be by the property owner or a mandatory property owner association in perpe- tuity or completion of the State of Florida condominium process which assures the same compliance. b. Development Order specifying that the Development Order runs with the land and is binding on the Applicant, it successors and assigns, jointly or severally. 2. Submittal of a parking plan for construction employees while the new buildings are under construction; said parking plan shall be subject to review and ap- proval by the Planning Department prior to the issuance of any building per- mits. 3. The applicant shall retain the services of an archeological consultant who will be responsible for conducting archeological monitoring of all ground disturbing ac- tivity as well as the subsequent recovery of artifacts. Said consultant shall work at the direction of the Dade County Archeologist and shall provide reports to both that office and to the City. 4. The applicant shall replace the row of royal palms along South Bayshore Drive with a more informal design. 5. The applicant shall ensure that the proposed shade trees do not completely block the view of house from South Bayshore Drive. 6. Pursuant to the Historic and Environmental Board, (tree #21 as specified in the tree survey on file), shall not be relocated in order to move the proposed swim- ming pool away from the north property line. 01 -124 7. The applicant small submit a final revised landscape plan with all specifications for the review and approval of the Planning Department prior to the issuance of a building permit. S. This approval shall also be subject to all additional conditions as specified in the attached Development Order. JI --19 C, J RESOLUTION PAB - 84-01 A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS, AS SPECIFIED BY STAFF, OF A MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT (AS MODIFIED) FOR THE ROYAL BAY ESTATES PROJECT LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY 1641 SOUTH BAYSHORE DRIVE AND 1640 MICANOPY AVENUE IN ORDER TO ALLOW A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PROJECT CONSISTING OF THREE SINGLE FAMILY HOMES (REDUCED FROM FOUR SINGLE FAMILY HOMES). HEARING DATE: October 17, 2001 ITEM NO. 1 VOTE: 6-1 ATTES Gelabert-Sanchez, D' r Planning and Zoning Department ::i _ 3 4 Ick II I w xa a xr to xn • ss ti � _ N + M •i 7S` s11 i'ars p } a t to e l Ix r x y• s a S e a ro f so�,• " ••'s 4 s'i 7, 4 e r• s 5 s° a so7A.1 7 tr r Hg1Z fl ~7 .� , •s, .•.s + y/� ^ 4 � � � {y n �! , PARK apP10 P 7 ,b Rev "* ` `. ^ * t.�e �' ` , ,� 4, +„! t•' � , YS4 rf1i7 2 12 �j� ` ! tott fl, �• o +p ` + � . • �' �\ { a .° m , 3 ,III S' �\ , 7 • �h, {o. "( � 6 � P� � 3 { � w D I • a `� cw +° •.e y • 7. d a�•,,!' P a t ,` N+Gtr � b,.' s ,° } " I" , I ° `ti y'' • +" '+ tq.P . '' � l 1 • EES H5 �t`1 ^^'}, 4 yOC.. A-7 VE T P io t • } • *g n 4 t•. p � t "s', a t e g SIL Iii Ee �� C' i � S e � b � w � '• its O •.,. uj 9 a• dtF' A % Q .p '� .1 ' fi A • P ^ 1 y I I 22 x} ° • f � r/ R � . � '�. . • 0• G ,'� d, � 'y y • `• S Op a.1+sr a8 A R f }/ 5 z I sa g r v a ° P� ,• } a�° �3 ,° ,++• +o ` S b a , / 10 I I 12 17 14 0 Ie 1 7 I { 19 0 21 • Sp P N � �'� • � � Yr ' \ •o •a H • f> ss •s " ,4 n G �a � N `y�'F' .°+A I I • •• �F•% '� � ' • 2 a 4 n' �'9i' s '',• '' P t x e a 7 a s 1• I1 +x I I lAa re I1 e ° �c zl :x r� a:}% 3 J� .•' w • /. e � ., '� • 7a 1 50 11 ° 11� 74 i3 M f0 e° s { � ... �, " ' 49 L ` ' `\ NOLA O r DRIVE •1 h �� s • 'r °If Ixfsla,eu n 3 s:°xlxs r33,r3� e~ r' ��+r oa �. ;LlaeEO le + ) Z Y IOZ Ift P�P,'2, Z �M•°6 yP�•� � 4 •1 •� 2/ RA CEY Jp Z �� II � GAG^ fl 3 ,•o .� .A ^' • . e PROP. \ i b• P .+ • 5z �p 1 •�\ t �• / M� ' r y + U tii' t£s Pt ` \ t t ihb4try o �O �y/q •L •, �'' TRACT "B � x �rn / � � ►• `�' t` s b 5 � ° SGP . �• .p 67 y, / ,� ? � Es � + `' 4• '•. 594o yf 1 1 en e / / r n:: • , � / '9� 'Ai. TRACT P V . tp _ t' Col. 4 �• s+• Q �J G� 77 'J i 1 e� C � ��a 3 .n Y � 'CSy: � • , diW ` � S.BATSNQAE CT. �(�� oL(., I s• eati� ¢�P � r "^ A � r � k Q 't `�+ .. v �,�' S • AGF° �.�'•'� t ti. n �/. , " e `\\` . PN ABY b t `-• 9• � ,b • J � �` � � ) • t0 •, h n � •s s•. C n s a • o +� ,8 6P a + / Co OG � �gi% • b t o R--3 `.V X0, r w y? F �', +♦%MOOOF 4 '.;;��" •` ,�. ref -� � AY'�K, 1 ,f e$ �y�j; 6 - � ¢ f�F '. i : Y ' fir,.,• �� .-'hf' . � _ h - 'P M .0 0 CITY OF NIIAMI PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPLICATION FOR MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT IT IS INTENDED THAT MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMITS BE REQUIRED WHERE SPECIFIED USES AND/OR OCCUPANCIES INVOLVE MATTERS DEEMED TO BE OF CPIYWIDE OR AREA -WIDE IMPORTANCE. THE CITY COMMISSION SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR DETERMINATIONS ON APPLICATIONS FOR MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMITS. {SEE ARTICLE 17 OF ORDINANCE 11000, AS AMENDED, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MUM1, FLORIDA.} THE CITY COMMISSION SHALL REFER ALL APPLICATIONS FOR MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMITS TO ITS PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD AND TO THE DIRECTOR OF THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT FOR RECOMMENDATIONS, AND MAY MAKE REFERRALS TO AGENCIES, BODIES, OR OFFICERS, EITHER THROUGH THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT OR DIRECTLY, FOR REVIEW, ANALYSIS AND/OR TECHNICAL FINDINGS AND DETERMINATIONS AND REPORTS THEREON. (SEE SECT70N 1301.5 OF ORDINANCE 11000, AS AMENDED, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE C=OFMZ06,, FLORIDA.) SECTION 2-653 OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA. AS AMENDED, GENERALLY REQUIRES ANY PERSON WHO RECEIVES COMPENSATION, REMUNERATION OR EXPENSES FOR CONDUCTING LOBBYING ACTT VrrM TO REGISTER AS A LOBBYIST WITH THE CITY CLERK, PRIOR TO ENGAGING IN LOBBYING ACTIVITIES BEFORE CITY STAFF, BOARDS, COMMITTEES AND THE CITY COMMISSION. A COPY OF SAID ORDINANCE IS AVAILABLE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CrTY CLERIC (MIAMI CITY -HALL), LOCATED AT 3500 PAN AMERICAN DRNE, MIAMI, FLORIDA, 33133. NOTE: THISAPPLIC4TION MUST BE TYPEWRITTENAND SIGNED INBLACR INK George Davigl.us ,. owner L�Ed �gef, njog' I.Raghagserp' 1J xdrienne F. Pardo, on behalf of hereby apply to the Director of the Planning Department of the City of Miami for approval of a Major Use Special Permit under the provisions of Article 17 of the City of Miami Zoning Ordinance. Pra erty Address: 1641 S. Bayshore Drive and 1640 Micanopy Avenue Nature of proposed use (be specific): Approval of a Planned Unit Development for 3 single family homes. APPLICATION MATERIALS 1 attach the following in support and explanation of the application - 3 1. Two original surveys, prepared by a State of Florida Registered Land Surveyor within one year from the date of application. 2. Affidavit disclosing ownership of property covered by application and disclosure of interest form (attach forms 483 and 4a-83 to application). APPLICATION MATERIALS (continued) attach the following in support and explanation of the application: i 3. Certified list of owners of real estate within a 375 -foot radius from the outside boundaries of property (attach form 6-83 to application). 13 4. Maps of the:. a) Existing zoning designation. b) Adopted comprehensive plan designation for areas on and around the property, IN 5. General Iocation map showing relation to the site or activity to major streets, schools, existing utilities, shopping areas, important physical features. in and adjoining the project, and the like. 6. Concept Plan a) Site plan and relevant information per Section 1304.2.Id-h. b) Relationships to surrounding existing and proposed futures uses and activities, systems and facilities, per Section 1702.3.2a. c) How concept affects existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan principles and designations; tabulation of any required variances, special permits, changes of zoning or exemptions, per Section 17023.2b. 1 7. Developmental Impact Study (an application for development approval for a Development of Regional Impact may subsiitute), 8. Other (be specific): ® 9. Fee of $ 5 , 0 0 0. 0 0 , for the Magor Use Special Permit, based on current fee schedule as set forth in Chapter 62 of the Code of the City of Miami, as amended. ❑ 10. Additional fee of $ —0— ; for any required special permits, changes of zoning or variances set forth in chapter 62 of the Code of the City of Miami, as amended. Total Fee: $ 6,832.50 Application: $5,000.00 Signature 1 Mailings: $ 682.50 Acly. ' Name Adrienne F.' Parg Surcharge 11,150.00 - Total: $6,832.50 Address 1221 Brickell Avenue, Miami, Fl 33131 Phone/Fax (305) 579-068 (305) 961-5683 Date -WAL APPROVAL OF THIS APPLICATION FOR MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT SHALL CONSIST OF AN EXECUTED RESOLUTION BY 7%TE bIi CITY COMMi5SION AND A DEVELOPMENT ORDER ATTACHED THERETO WHICH SPECIFIES THE CONDnIONS UNDER WHICH T'IC .OR USE SPECIAL PERMIT APPLICATION IS APPROVED; IF APPROVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION, SAID RESOLUTION AND DEVELOPMENT ORDER SHALL, UPON EXECUTION THEREOF, BE TRANSMIT ED TO THE OWNER OR AUTHORIZED AGEN AT THE ADDRESS SPECIFIED ABOVE. -�` 34 f STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this r day of May 20 01 by Adrienne F. Pardo who is personally known to me or who has produced as identification and who did (did not) take an oath. ti Nam, Nota Publia4tat�Eic fQ .- , Cam rssion.Na.'.,` My C mmi`ssic�nj'Xpjre STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20 , by of a corporation, on behalf of the corporation. He/She is personally known to me or has produced as identification and who did (did not) take an oath. Name: Notary Public -State of Florida Commission No.: My Commission Expires: STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20 , by partner (or agent) on behalf of , a partnership. He/She is personally known to me or who has produced as identification and who did (did not) take an oath. 5 Name: Notary Public -State of Florida Commission No.: My Commission Expires: : i-19-4 AFFIDAVIT Before- me,, the undersigned authority, this day personally appeared Adrienne F. Pardo , who being by me first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and says: 1. That he/she is the owner, or the legal representative of the owner, submitting the accompanying application for a public hearing as required by Chapter 55 of the Code of the City of Miami, Florida, affecting the real property located in the City of Miami, as described and listed on the pages attached to this affidavit and made a part thereof. 2. That all owners which he/she represents, if any, have given their full and complete permission for him/her to act in his/her behalf for the change or modification of a classification or regulation of zoning as set out in the accompanying petition. 3. That the pages attached hereto and made a part of this affidavit contain the current names, mailing addresses, telephone numbers and legal descriptions for the real property of which he/she is the owner or legal representative. 4. The facts as represented in the application and documents submitted in conjunction with this affidavit are true and correct. Further Affiant sayeth not. STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE IJ _J A, P:t -A Applicant's Signature ' The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ~ i day of )1110 L- _ 20 01 , by Adrienne F. Pardo who is personally known to me or who has produced as identification and who did (did not) take an oath. Name: Notary Public -State of Florida Commission No.: My Commission E --x,- OF i ��i.IT��1 J 1234 i OWNER'S LIST Owner's Name Georse F. Davieuls • Mailing Address 1641 S. Ba shore Drive Miami Florida Zip Code 33133 Telephone Number Legal Description: See attached Exhibit "l". 1 Owner's Name Mailing Address _ Telephone Number Legal Description: Owner's Name Mailing Address _ Telephone Number Legal Description: Zip Code Zip Code Any other real estate property owned individually, jointly, or severally (by corporation, partnership or privately) within 375 feet of the subject site is listed as follows: Street Address Legal Description None Street Address Street Address Legal Description Legal Description CONTRACT PURCHASER OWNER'S LIST Owner's Name The Royal Bay Grou LLC Mailing Address 1110 Brickell Avenue Suite 5041 Miami Florida Zip Code 33131 Telephone Number 786-777-0771 Legal Description: See attached Exhibit "1", Owner's Name Mailing Address Telephone Number Legal Description: Owner's Name Mailing Address Telephone Number Legal Description: Zip Code Zip Code Any other real estate property owned individually, jointly, or severally (by corporation, partnership or privately) within 375 feet of the subject site is listed as follows: None Street Address Street Address Street Address Legal Description Legal Description Legal Description i1 -1234 DISCLOSURE OF OWNERSHIP 1. Legal description and street address of subject real property: 1641 S. Bayshore Drive and 1640 Micanopy Avenue, Miami, Florida 2. Owner(s) of subject real property and percentage of ownership. Note: Section 2-618 of the Code of the City of Miami requires disclosure of all parties having a financial interest, either direct or indirect, in the subject matter of a presentation, request or petition to the City Commission. Accordingly, question #2 requires disclosure of shareholders of corporations, beneficiaries of trust, and/or any other interested parties, together with their addresses and proportionate interest. George Daviglus 3. Legal description and street address of any real property (a) owned by any party listed in answer to question #2, and (b) located within 375 feet of the subject real property. None STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI -DADS The foregoing 2001 by produced oath. Owner or Attorney for Owner Adrienne F. Pardo instrument was acknowledged before me this day of Adrienne F. Pardo , who isersonally ]mown to me or who has as identification and who did (did not) take an Name: ( J Notary Public -State of Fforida Commission No.: My Commission Expires: ` -��'9 CONTRACT PURCHASER DISCLOSURE OF OWNERSHIP 1. Legal description and street address of subject real property: 1641 S. Bayshore Drive and 1640 Micanopy Avenue, Miami, Florida 2. Owner(s) of subject real property and percentage of ownership. Note: Section 2-618 of the Code of the City of Miami requires disclosure of all parties having a financial interest, either direct or indirect, in the subject matter of a presentation, request or petition to the City Commission. Accordingly, question #2 requires disclosure of shareholders of corporations, beneficiaries of trust, and/or any other interested parties, together with their addresses and proportionate interest. The Royal Bay Group, LLC is owned by: Robert Thorne 50% Frank Amedia 50% 3. Legal description and street address of any real property (a) owned by any party listed in answer to question #2, and (b) located within 375 feet of the subject real property. None Owner or Attorney for Owner Adrienne F. Pardo STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI DARE The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2001 by Adrienne F. Pardo , who is personally known to me or who has produced as identification and who did (did not) take an oath. Name: Notary Public -State of Flori Conumssierr,?--- My C mmissaoti Ekpk6's?'7A-1-r I NDiNtYriTqLk ',T„irCM A !1 Gi>4 1. Legal Description: 2. Address: 3. Zoning Classification: 4. Lot Area: S. Height: Gross Area Provided: Net Area 5. Density: 6. Allowable Area: Exbibit "i" ROYAL RAY ESTATES MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT Project Data Sheet LOT 1 AND 4, PRICE TERRACE ACCORDING TO THE PLA THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 82, AT PAGE 46, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF MIAMI -DARE COUNTY, FLORIDA 1641 South Bayshore Dr. City of Miami R-1, SD -3, SD -18.1 1.27 acres or 55,315 sq. ft. 1.08 acres or 47,250 sq. ft. Units/Acre Allowed: 9 units/acre Units/Acre Provided: 4 units/acre Floor Area Ratio (FAR): Max. Allowed - 0.8 Provided - 0.36 7. Loading Berths: Required: N/A Provided: N/A S. Height: Allowed: Provided: 25'-0" 25�-011 9. Building Footprint: 22,126 sf (40%) 11,500 sf (21%) 10. Number of Parking Spaces: Required: Provided: 8 9 Handicapped spaces Required: Provided: N/A N/A • 11. Open Space: 12. Setbacks: Project Data Sheet (Contj South Bayshore (Front Yazd) Interior Sides (Side Yard) Micanopy Ave. (Back Yard) Required 8,297 sf (15%) Required: 70' R�uired: 5' Re uired: 20' Provided 32,350 sf (58%) Provided: 132' Provided: 5' Provided: 20' 123 3 LAW OFFICES SHUBIN & BASS P R 0 F F S S 1 0 N A L A S S 0 C I A T 1 0 N VIA FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION November 15, 2001 Ms. Adrienne F. Pardo, Esq. Greenberg Traurig 1221 Brickell Avenue Miami, Florida 33131 Re: Royal Bay Dear Adrienne: This letter is written on behalf of Mr. Kendall Coffey and Ms. Joni Armstrong Coffey. Its purpose is to express their support for the Royal Bay project as revised by your client to include only three single family homes, with respect shown for the bluff and the neighborhood. We would like to thank you and your client for their cooperation throughout this long and difficult settlement process. As always, please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions concerning this correspondence. t L:; Iteir Walter city" MIAMI TAMPAS ° 46 S.W. 1st Street, 3rd Floor, Miami, Florida 33130 707 Florida Avenue, Tampa, Florida 33602 — 12 ' `JC Ph: 305.381.6060 Fx:305.381-9467 Ph:813.223.4786 Fx:813•2.23.4787 Prepared by: BERMELLO, JAMIL & PA.RTNERS GREENBERG TRAURIG' 9 • r LAMBERT ADVISORY JACKSON! A AI-ILSTEDT, P.E. lk J6 pod i + -*# ' • ns i _6 'r w.,.@gsSSK � February 7, 2001 Revised. May 7, 2001 A Project Of: THE, ROYAL BAY GRo P 0 0 ROYAL BAY ESTATES MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT 1641 South Bayshore Drive & 1640 Micanopy Avenue Prepared by: BERMELLO, AJAMIL & PARTNERS, INC. GREENBERG TRAURIG LAMBERT ADVISORY JACKSON & AHLSTEDT, P.E. Revised May 7, 2001 A PROJECT OF The Royal Bay Group Submitted Into the public record In connection wlt4; item P� •3 on J1_Ss-or Walter Foernan �z' :�U) 3' City Clerk • 0 ' TABLE OF CONTENTS Article I. Project Information A. Letter of Intent a. Application for Major Use Special Permit • Request for Certificate of Appropriateness as per the City Code for ground disturbing activity in an archeological conservation area. C. Zoning Write -Up D. Aerial E. Zoning Atlas F. Project Data Sheet G. Computer Tax Printouts/Deed H. Ownership List I. State of Florida Corporate Documents 1 J. Directory of Project Principals K. Owner's Authorization Letter Article IL Project Description A. Zoning Ordinance No. 11000 1. Section 1304.2.1 Applications Forms; Supplementary Materials 2. Section 1702.2.1 General Report 3. Section 1702.2.2 Major Use Special Permit Concept Plan 4. Section 1702.2.3 Development Impact Study Article III. Supporting Documents Tab 1 Minority Construction Employment Plan Tab 2 Traffic Impact Analysis Tab 3 Site Utility Study Tab 4 Economic Impact Study Submitted into the public, record in connection wif,; Tab 5 Survey of Property Item P8-3 on &:L� Tab 6 Drawingsn � Waltor Foe:rm-An 6 V (`i+,v Erol, 't E Article I ROYAL BAY ESTATES MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT Project Information C. D. E. F. G. H. 1. J. K. Letter of Intent Application for Major Use Special Permit Request for Certificate of Appropriateness as per the City Code for ground disturbing activity in an archeological conservation area. Zoning Write -Up Aerial Zoning Atlas Project Data Sheet Computer Tax Printouts/Deed Ownership List State of Florida Corporate Documents Directory of Project Principals Owner's Authorization letter Submitted into the public record in connection with Item PZ�s ono�- Waltev oeman A Oubmittcd Into the public record In connection with item PL3 on IL. - .I Walter Foernan City Cleric • MIKE • A T T 0 R N E Y s A T L A W Adrienne Friesner Pardo (305)579-0083 Direct Fax: (305) 961-5683 E -Mail: pardoa@gtlaw.com May 7, 2001 Ms. Teresita Fernandez Clerk, Hearing Boards City of Miami 444 S.W. 2nd Avenue, 71h Floor Miami, FL 33130 Re: Letter of [ntent for 1641 S. Bayshore Drive and 1640 Micanopy Avenue Dear Ms. Fernandez: On behalf of George Daviglus, the owner and the Royal Bay Group, LLC the contract purchaser, we are submitting a revised application for a Major Use Special Permit ("MUSP") for designation as a Planned Unit Development for four (4) single family homes. Should you have any questions, please call me at (305) 579-0693. Thank you very much for your attention to this matter. Very truly yours, Adrienne Friesner Pardo MIAMI/PARDOA/1204180/pt5g01l.DOC/5103/01 Submitted into the publia record in connection with item — on GREENBERG TRAURIG, P:A. i 1A I.) j.t� waiter I–OOi�1an 1221 BiMRICKELL AVENn iAM1, FLORIDA 33131 " r 1 •`1 4 City ClerR 305-579-0500 FAX 305-579-0717 www.gtiaw.com 1 NEW YORK WASHINGTON, A.C. ATLANTA PHILADELPHIA TYsoNs CORNER CHICAGO BOSTON PHOENIX WILMINGTON Los ANGELSs DENVER Submitted into the public record in connection with stern P9-3 on f l• l f 4 l Walter• Foeman City Cler`lf B CITY OF MIAMI PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPLICATION FOR MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT IT IS INTENDED THAT MAJOR USE SPECIAL, PERMITS BE REQUIRED WHERE SPECIFIED USES AND/OR OCCUPANCIES INVOLVE MATTERS DEEMED TO BE OF CITYWIDE OR AREA -WIDE IMPORTANCE, THE CITY COMMISSION SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR DETERMINATIONS ON APPLICATIONS FOR MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMITS. (SEE ARTICLE 17 OF ORDINANCE 11000, AS AMEMDED, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE C177OFMMAMI, FLORIDA.) THE CI"T"Y COMMISSION SHALL REFER ALL APPLICATIONS FOR MAJOR USE SPECIAL. PERMITS TO THE PLANNING ADVISORY 130ARD AND TO THE DIRECTOR OF THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT FOR RECOMMENDATIONS, AND MAY MAKE REFERRALS TO AGENCIES, BODIES, OR OFFICERS, EITHER THROUGH THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT OR DIRECTLY, FOR REVIEW, ANALYSIS AND/OR TECHNICAL FINDINGS AND DETERMINATIONS AND REPORTS THEREON. (SEE SECTYON 1301.5 OF ORDINANCE 11000_4S AMENDED, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA.) SECTION 2-653 OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, AS AMENDED, GENERALLY REQUIRES ANY PERSON WHO RECEIVES COMPENSATION, REMUNERATION OR EXPENSES FOR CONDUCTING LOBBYING ACTIVITIES TO REGISTER AS A LOBBYIST WITH THE CITY CLERK, PRIOR TO .ENGAGING IN LOBBYING ACTIVITIES BEFORE CITY STAFF, BOARDS, COMMITTEES AND THE CITY COMMISSION. A COPY OF SAID ORDINANCE IS AVAILABLE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK. (MIAMI CITY HALL), LOCATED AT 3500 PAN AMERICAN DRIVE, MIAMI, FLORIDA, 33133. NOTE: THIS APPLICATION MUST BE TYPEWRITTENAND SIGNED IN BLACK INK George Daviglus,. ownerd The R❑ 1 Ba roup, Adrienne F. Pardo, on behalf of L , contra purh ser I, , hereby apply to the Director of the Planning Department of the City of Miami for approval of a Major Use Special Permit under the provisions of Article 17 of the City of Miami Zoning Ordinance. Property Address: 1641 S. Bayshore Drive and 1640 Micanopy Avenue Nature of proposed use (be specific): Approval of a Planned Unit Development for 3 single famil homes. APPLICATION MATERIALS I attach the following in support and explanation of the application: 13 1. Two original surveys, prepared by a State of Florida Registered band Surveyor within one year from the date of application. 2. Affidavit disclosing ownership of property covered by application and disclosure of interest form (attach forms 4-83 and 4a-83 to application). Submitted Into the public record in connoction with item i3— on I1. . —0 / i �b INalter Foernan .. '~ . -c. Cilei Clock L E P' "CATION D4ATERIALS (continued) 46 I the following in support and expianation of the application: l 3. Certified list of owners of real estate within a 375 -foot radius from the outside boundaries of property (attach form 6-83 to application). 1 4. Maps of the: a) Existing zoning designation. 1 b) Adopted comprehensive plan designation for areas on and around the property. 5. General location map showing relation to the site or activity to major streets, schools, existing utilities, shopping areas, important physical features in and adjoining the project, and the like. '1 6. Concept Plan a) Site pian and relevant information per Section 1304.2.ld-h. b) Relationships to surrounding existing and proposed futures uses and activities, systems and facilities, per Section 1702.3.2a. c) How concept affects existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan principles and designations; tabulation of any required variances, special permits, changes of zoning or exemptions, per Section 1702.3.2b. 7. Developmental Impact Study (an application for development approval for a Development of Regional Impact may substitute). 0 8. Other (be specific): 1.1 9. Fee of $ 5,000-00 , for the Major Use Special Permit, based on current fee schedule as set forth in Chapter 62 of the Code of the City of Miami; as amended, :1 10. Additional fee of $__ -0- ; for any required special permits, changes of zoning or variances set forth in chapter 62 of the Code of the City of Miami, as amended. rotal Fee: $ 6,832-50 Application: $5,000-00 Signature Mailings: $ .682.50 Adv. Name Adrienne F.- Pardo — Surcharge $1,150-00 Total: $6,832.50 Address 1221 Brickell Avenue, Miami, Fl 33131 Phone/Fax (305) 579--0683 (305) 961--5683 Date Ca -- APPROVAL OF THIS APPLICATION FOR MAIOR USE SPECIAL. PERMIT SHALL CONSIST OF AN EXECUTED RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COMMISSION AND A DEVELOPMENT ORDER ATTACHED THERETO WHICH SPECIFIES THE CONDITIONS UNDER wH]CH'TMS USE SPECIAL. PERMIT APPLICATION IS APPROVED; IF APPROVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION, SAID RESOLUTION AND DEVELOPMENT ORDER SHALL, UPON EXECUTION THEREOF, 3E TRANSMITTED TO THE OWNER OR AU13WfiRft0qfft&Ttffff public ADDRESS SPECIFIED ABOVE, record in connection with item ttt onOl `� Walter Fooman City Clark • • r� U STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 20 Q by Adrienne F. Pardo known to me or who has produced as identification and who did (did not) take an oath. Na Col My STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE • day of who May is personally The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20 by corporation, on produced of a behalf of the corporation. He/She is personally known to me or has as identification and who did (did not) take an oath. Name: Notary Public -State of Florida Commission No.: My Commission Expires: *****+r x��r+.��*�.�r�+��t**i***�rwne�ev���►+��inrw*,r�rk��*��*x,�e�***+�*wr►,tirr�***+nr*nt*,r*nr*,�-�,�wneir**,►�r,�rkww,r,irari►ir*� STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20 by partner (or agent) on behalf of , a partnership. He/She is personally known to me or who has produced as identification and who did (did not) take an oath. Submitted into the pubiiC record in d, inection with item i3-- on LE11-Az— walter 1=oemall city Clerk Name: Notary Public -State of Florida Commission No.: My Commission Expires: 5I� � " 4� 104 • DISCLOSURE OF OWNERSHIP 1. Legal description and street address of subject real property: 1641 S. Bayshore Drive and 1640 Micanopy Avenue, Miami, Florida 2. Owner(s) of subject real property and percentage of ownership. Note: Section 2-618 of the Code of the City of Miami requires disclosure of all parties having a financial interest, either direct or indirect, in the subject matter of a presentation, request or petition to the City Commission. Accordingly, question #2 requires disclosure of shareholders of corporations, beneficiaries of trust, and/or any other interested parties, together with their addresses and proportionate interest. George Daviglus 3. Legal description and street address of any real property (a) owned by any party listed in answer to question #2, and (b) located within 375 feet of the subject real property. None i Owner or Attorney for O er Adrienne F. Pardo STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI -DADS The . foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2001 by Adrienne F. Pardo who is personally known to ane or who has roduced as identification and who did (did not) take an p oath. Submltt.e, ; �`Y� l a,,;� publla record in c orirrw,Jon with !tern Z• 3 on ILILAL Welter Foeman City Clerk )_�l 0 t I'A D 9 V Name: i Notary Public -State of Fl rida Commission No.: My Commission Expires: riF F`f RTDA Mz • • • 0 CONTRACT PURCHASER DISCLOSURE OF OWNERSHIP 1. Legal description and street address of subject real property: 11 1641 S. Bayshore Drive and 1640 Micanopy Avenue, Miami, Florida 2. Owner(s) of subject real property and percentage of ownership. Note: Section 2-618 of the Code of the City of Miami requires disclosure of all parties having a financial interest, either direct or indirect, in the subject matter of a presentation, request or petition to the City Commission. Accordingly, question #2 requires disclosure of shareholders of corporations, beneficiaries of trust, and/or any other interested parties, together with their addresses and proportionate interest. The Royal Bay Group, LLC is owned by: Robert Thorne 50% Frank Amedia 50% 3. Legal description and street address of any real property (a) owned by any party listed in answer to question #2, and (b) located within 375 feet of the subject real property. None STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE The foregoing 2001 by produced oath. .J (a. , "Z�' - Owner or Attorne for Owner Adrienne F. Pardo instrument was acknowledged before me this I day of Adrienne F, Pardo , who is personally known to me or who has as identification and who did (did not) take an Subr !V, d icl) t,�e public record in r rTloc;tion with item �2 -_.. on A'alter Foeman Cit} Clerk 'N� �. Name: Notary Public -State of Flori Commissiet:fi�'i��c..'""t My C n=y(birgil 0 • 0 OWNER'S LIST Owner's Name George F. Daviguls Mailing Address 1641 S. BMshore Drive Miami Florida Zip Code 33133 Telephone Number Legal Description: See attached Exhibit "1". Owner's Name Mailing Address , Telephone Number Legal Description: Owner's Name _ Mailing Address _ Telephone Number Legal Description: Zip Code Zip Code Any other real estate property owned individually, jointly, or severally (by corporation, partnership or privately) within 375 feet of the subject site is listed as follows: Street Address Legal Description None Street Address Street Address Legal Description Legal Description f'Ic public record in corglection with item a• on Walter Foeman J I `. 3 4 City Clerk 0 CONTRACT PURCkZASER OWNER'S LIST Owner's Name The Ra ai Bay Group, LLC Mailing Address 11:0 Briciceil Avenue Suite 504 Miami, Florida Zip Code 33 t31 Telephone Number 786-777-0771 Legal Description: See attached Exhibit "1", Owner's Name Mailing Address _ Telephone Number Legal Description: Owner's Name Mailing Address _ Telephone Number Legal Description: Zip Code r Zip Code Any other real estate property owned individually, jointly, or severally (by corporation, partnership or privately) within 375 feet of the subject site is listed as follows: Street Address Legal Description None • Street Address Street Address Legal Description Legal Description Submittoc, Wo lino public record in connection with it on G"" Wi ter Foeman 1.'pity Clerk • • 0 • AFFIDAVIT • Before me, the undersigned authority, this day personally appeared Adrienne F. Pardo , who being by me first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and says: 1. That he/she is the owner, or the legal representative of the owner, submitting the accompanying application for a public hearing as required by Chapter 55 of the Code of the City of Miami, Florida, affecting the real property located in the City of Miami, as described and listed on the pages attached to this affidavit and made a part thereof. 2. That all owners which he/she represents, if any, have given their full and complete permission for him/her to act in his/her behalf for the change or modification of a classification or regulation of zoning as set out in the accompanying petition. 3. That the pages attached hereto and made a part of this affidavit contain the current names, mailing addresses, telephone numbers and legal descriptions for the real property of which he/she is the owner or legal representative. 4. The facts as represented in the application and documents submitted in conjunction with this affidavit are true and correct. Further Affiant sayeth not. STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE a"L A -.,- Applicant's Signature The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20 01 , by Adrienne F. Pardo who is per really known to me or who has produced as identification and who did (did not) take an oath. Submitted into the publld record in conne tion with item 2�' �. on IE 11LAI Walter Foeman City Clerk Name: Notary Public -State of Florida Commission No.. My CommiTsion h� r u ; „y � �. a MA i , ;CSF iZ.Ca�ril]dt � 1N(YrP�°":'iX13!N S�, r n I1 Bio. cc vims . .y C 1641 SOUTH BAYSHORE DRIVE . AND 1640 MICANOPY AVENUE R-1/SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AND SD-3/COCONUT GROVE MANOR STREETS OVERLAY DISTRICT AND SD -18, SD -18.1 MINIMUM LOT SIZE OVERLAY DISTRICT MUSP', as per article 5, Section 502, densities (four homes) for the planned unit development in residential districts are as follows. Per City Code, Chapter 36. Construction Equipment Request for waiver of noise ordinance while under construction for building shell. Per City code, Chapter 23-5a, Request for a Certificate of Appropriateness for ground disturbing activity in an Archeological Conservation Area. Class II Special Permit as per Article 6, Section 603.3.1, for development of new construction within a Special District. Class I Permit as per Article 6, Section 603.3.1, to allow a parking area and vehicular way visible from a public street. Class I Permit as per Article 9, Section 920.1, to allow a construction trailer. Class I Special Permit as per Article 9, Section 925.3.8, to allow development/construction/rental signage. ce McPhee Date oning Inspector II Submitted into the public record in connection with Wafter Foeman . - ` 4 City Cleric 7 ir 0. Q _- - ,.I- -:. 't-`"•'�? 1. - _ t )i- r_ L - LI J `i .I. 2 •�.�� 4-{&' � - I _ �r i - it � st - A: rL{L E �f � - � �� 6r i.,_kr3 a� e'` r �yc Lill I'saw _RMrrr [ is IL- _�+• �_ �, ' _ �F I• 4 k _ _ t Naay7T -'iY r - d r'#•.C' rfA t r� �� _ ll r, _-.�., - ,tt �' i - �7�-1` ��� �dlf��� 7 �� • lii - � _ �`4z�,� jrt; _ ` r� I ray � l � h _ __ - 4:0 CIL FBF y A 01 _ - -__ �r ��-�r �, r r�, '•r �-� ,'� �j'� , y L I' _ r_ r'� � �r�s �� � u � - E�- �R �` }„ - r r �, i �A tk wk � -I r 1. � ` r• �I� Y14j IM "��r�' .,� :,,�-�,�i��, � F`- L;' � . - � I �.� - � _ � � �r -fir• `' - +mfr r: '� r�Csi ,=r� _ ,t{>•6 _ -r�i _� lig �-;E. �� - r� �rti'•F� �+ �� i''. _ -� t 1 r-`�tr _ f`•_� h-y�k+�[K _'I - -.� �-I' I _ 0:110 `' ORAFs_ rr� ,� f Vit: `� TONG L� �, • .'�V - � r!' ; Ifs � �- � J = 1� e-' s � f SOUP OIL 1:Fr`��-2r r ";�i � ! r4� �ryP. - .I• � �'; a_(.y'� .I sY. � t.�i� �� } -� It >-� sa - J 3 Y �> k �, f}ter �. f- I "- I1 ` r 4jI �_-•`r y s i r _ cc 1K r' �•� { L r - - _ r ''tet �e - s _ .''� y k�'� _ � . 4 �,r •' f � _ � � � F�'� ir Nil 0. � r� l{'-'�L �-.G'�'�" ��' FF-=� �.� �� �.1 •l i� ---ism L,iFGC�"- _f 3•� .- ' 9M SORT p, , rr.r - d- •JJ j LJ 0 •t of � 5 nR V V 15o iA 't 01 Q h i3 • � U7 f , .6 4 a � rr•> '�. 67 RAI ,m yi .,c Ca AGLER M VF R. =rK 4-90 ctrl -9a) G � 5 nrs .SPECTO a �? �G - b`'.Jy �� $may°�•�> ti '� �S^' _ A6 sH0R�Cr OC�� u ,Z ,1 �1 �; pct • 6• ��/ `� � �. . o ip I� LU'F1�`�yQ�`�'pt - 3E r -\ ,)ubf liiiml if"I': t iG' public 1 rocor Ire i;c>nfloction rrrith ® / \ Item Z' - ,asp 1 L• -I • e ! / ` Wainer Fooman R-3�� City Clerk u b [y' u a 1"S die C. c�-a r 1...i � •� 5• F 4 y A, Y ,is,to certify that this-is E.� � 1 e ` �' • of 1 • v'� : , � ► � �� ri o: the ©1F.5ci2l Zoning a $ 1•M14i.1v4F d t -ilwr+�d�► va�adopLb ri,.� %f � p �� O � � a � / b•sa idtd� Lel i ac City of �Y11a ` a vs c^ .� 9 ti ` �ttr +,• T aQQI`'avw aa'14.ach'4, 17751 a � { ' rt ° •+• ,.� y P,epa-cd by: 43 �. • � A � ul �1*" • p r yp A cn • tib- •' h 67 a Q ,f � + � � t � � �y,Y; •,i ++ l f ►,+ A1C. �,s a w` .. ,> �OQj •jt �� .,��� T1 111 ��,*'+d • a+ v 7 S.SAYSt+QRE Cr, • S IZZ 'AN w s �• sv� •ate ��d, _� � l�bi3li ii'ci iF 4� tiro public rocord in co+'r odo ion with on f j +q� City C1011C o 1p u7 6 •T �^ �� y., , \9 s• 6 , � t O S 14 - IS N y o P it 67 by'CY IL AR �s rfi o 4-90lk ,b� AYiI•�Pa 4 \Y -y*�/'j ✓ Al - `�1 \1 BA 90c ri ryy4 l FSA Edo. k P 10 l r r'ocofd in connoclJon with itom PM - A- on • 11- lTnO _rVi CUR-nr Foc man'- Cihj Cfcrk' SII Location Map ,�� �� , / ■ 1 TgA 47 Wlk € Al 144 Flo 1��• #�i I F` it '�+ ► r s Ti k t •, � ..' , fr �� Fk}y =F 7 i a a [ay .lr6 P PW —r l.{ - Fye 3a - 4 fk['' {Ia ; I� p]i8� T }fL G� z •-�M., W�L -r �fk - 4-- 4k.l�;�. JLIT . � � - r— _ - .i�3r rf �_-,fF S i `� 'i - � k I • ��_ � t � ��� -� � °a. �-.. S }S k � -� �-•I• _:,�"��iC'I+. -- `cr -_ i{ �-�` _ I I�Er JAS ``,r = _kl Le �i Fri - NA -67 - -_4 . N �` ,[ F.i � y€ -t � r< L;r f��i. � �1 r�� �- •i:� 1, "�` r Its _ Af. = a- 711: ', iFc J - - 5 �� � J - 4r-� r 4 � r� fpt y r -€� � rY� r Rye _- I _- r --�k d .F. - - - I � €-! �K fr G. - ♦ � � �i ;•�.- �•' � - - 4' � -`1 r s' - f 7f - _ r. F f - I� ' - _ rr.� r _ � ,� �'4,-'t'-� ;R: U El I . Legal Description: 2. Address: 3, Zoning Classification: 4. Lot Area: Loading Berths: Gross Area Provided: N/A Not Area 5. Density: 6. Allowable Area: ROYAL BAY ESTATES MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT Project Data 'Sheet LOT I AND 4, PRICE TERRACE ACCORDING TO THE PLA THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 82, AT PAGE 46, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF MIAMI -DARE. COUNTY, FLORIDA 1641 South Bayshore Dr. City of Miami R-1, SD -3, SD -18.1 1.27 acres or 55,315 sq. ft. 1.08 acres or 47,250 sq. ft. Units/Acre Allowed: 9 units/acre Units/Acre Provided: 4 units/acre Floor Area Ratio (FAR): Max. Allowed - 0.8 Provided - 0.36 7. Loading Berths: Required: N/A Provided: N/A 8. Height: Allowed: Provided: 25'-0" 25f-011 9. Building Footprint: 22,126 sf (40%) 11,500 sf (21%) 10. Number of Parking Spaces: Required: Provided: 8 9 Handicapped spaces Required: Provided: NIA N/A Submitted into tbo public rocor•d in connection with itaill ,z � on ..&. X 1 Walter Foernart Citi/ Gler1< a 11. Open Space: Project Data Sheet (Cont.) 12. Setbacks: South Bayshore (Front Yard) Interior Sides (Side Yard) Micanopy Ave. (Back Yard) Required 8,297 sf (15%) Required: 70' Required: 5' Required: 20' 0 Provided 32,350 sf (58%) Provided: 132' Provided: 5' Provided: 20' Submittad into tho p"I)JIV, Word in connection with item o �, �, Waiter !~000ian r sub„ mit o into the public record in connection with Itom PLA-- on ljjr—Pt. City Clerk Parcel Infoimation Page 1 of 1 MIAMI -DADS COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER PUBLIC ACCESS FOLIO NUMBER: ADDRESS: MAILING ADDRESS: CLUC: PRIMARY ZONE: BEDROOMS: FLOORS: ADJ SQUARE FOOTAGE: YEAR BUILT: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SALE OIR: 120982856 ASSESSMENT YEAR: LAND VALUE: BUILDING VALUE: MARKET VALUE: ASSESSMENT YEAR: LAND VALUE: BUILDING VALUE: MARKET VALUE: ADDRESS: 1641 S BAYSHORE Use scroll bar to view complete information. 01.4140.009.0010 1641 S BAYSHORE DR GEORGE F DAVIGLUS, 1641 S BAYSHORE DR, MIAMI FL, , 33133-4213 0001 RESIDENTIAL- SINGLE FAMILY 0100 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE 4 BATHS: 4 2 LIVING UNITS: 1 2,872 LOT SIZE: 30,375 SQ FT 1915 PRICE TERRACE PB 82-46 LOT 1 LOT SIZE 135.000 X 225 OR 13715-2598 0588 5 SALE MONTH: 3 SALE YEAR: 1984 SALE AMOUNT: 2000 ASSESSED VALUE: $ 339,068 $ 297.675 HOMESTEAD EXEMPTION: $ 25,000 $ 92,277 WIDOW EXEMPTION: $ 0 $ 389,952 TOTAL EXEMPTIONS: $ 25,000 TAXABLE VALUE: $ 314,068 1999 ASSESSED VALUE: $ 330,154 $ 237,877 HOMESTEAD EXEMPTION: $ 25,000 $ 92,277 WIDOW EXEMPTION: $ 0 $ 330,154 TOTAL EXEMPTIONS: $ 25,000 TAXABLE VALUE: $ 305,154 Owner Search Address Search Folio Number Search Bacot Map Version (Coming Soonl) Home Page $ 313,000 into the public record in connection with itom �2_' on _11.1'•_91 City Cled(, ,../esiirnap.dll?Name=PublicAccess&Cmd=SearchAddressT&STNum=1641 &STPDir=S&STNatlll?101 Parcel Information Page 1 of 1 MIAMI -DADS COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER PUBLIC ACCESS ADDRESS: 1640 MICANOPY FOLIO NUMBER: ADDRESS: MAILING ADDRESS: CLUC: PRIMARY ZONE: BEDROOMS: FLOORS; ADJ SQUARE FOOTAGE: YEAR BUILT: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SALE Oft 120982856 ASSESSMENT YEAR: LAND VALUE: BUILDING VALUE: MARKET VALUE: ASSESSMENT YEAR: LAND VALUE: BUILDING VALUE: MARKET VALUE: Use scroll bar to view camptele information. 01-4140-009-0040 1640 MICANOPY AVE GEORGE F DAVIGLUS, 1641 S BAYSHORE DR, MIAMI FL, , 33133-4213 0001 RESIDENTIAL -SINGLE FAMILY 0`100 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE 4 BATHS: 2 2 LIVING UNITS: 2 1,719 LOT SIZE: 16,875 SQ FT 1924 PRICE TERRACE PB 82.46 LOT 4 LOT SIZE 135.000 X 125 OR 13715-2598 0588 5 SALE MONTH: 3 SALE YEAR: 1984 SALE AMOUNT: $ 313,000 2000 ASSESSED VALUE: $ 280,842 $ 223,594 HOMESTEAD EXEMPTION: $ 0 $ 57,248 WIDOW EXEMPTION: $ 0 $ 280,842 TOTAL EXEMPTIONS: $ 0 TAXABLE VALUE: $ 280,842 1999 ASSESSED VALUE: $ 231,723 $ 174,475 HOMESTEAD EXEMPTION: $ 0 $ 57,248 WIDOW EXEMPTfON: $ 0 $ 231,723 TOTAL EXEMPTIONS; $ 0 TAXABLE VALUE: $ 231,723 Owner Search Address Search Folio Number Search Back Map Version (Coming Soonf} Home Page ubrt,ltb O ir,_ tho pUbiic record in connection with iter<n ,dip 3 ori Walter Foornan `> e$ City Clerk ... /esrimap.dll?Name—PublicAccess&Cmd=SearchAddressT&STNum=1640&STPDii7--+ -&STN;l/17/01 El �Ubmittcd into the Public rocord in carr +�P�1e(;t';on vvilh 1 CONSUELO M. QUINTANA REAL ESTATE DATA RESEARCHER 1111 SW 11th Avenue, Miami, FL 33129-1820 OFC # 305-858-2287 FAX # 305-859-2439 MAY 3, 2001 CITY OF MIAMI PLANNING & ZONING BOARD ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT P.O. BOX 330708 MIAMI, FL 33133 RE: PROPERTY OWNERSHIP LIST 50OFT FROM: 1641 SOUTH BAYSHORE DR (AND) 1640 MICANOPY AVENUE COCONUT GROVE, FL 33133 F#01-4140-009-0010 & 0040 (STREET ADDRESS) LOTS 1 & 4 PRICE TERRACE SUBDIVISION PLAT BOOK 82-46 (LEGAL DESCRIPTION) DADE COUNTY FLORIDA. THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE ATTACHED OWNERSHIP LIST, MAP AND MAILING MATRIX IS A COMPLETE AND ACCURATE REPRESENTATION OF THE REAL ESTATE PROPERTY AND PROPERTY OWNERS 60OFT FROM THE SUBJECT PROPERTY LISTED ABOVE. THIS REFLECTS THE MOST CURRENT RECORDS ON FILE IN THE DADE COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S OFFICE. SINCERELY, l _ ,C©NSUELO M. QUINTAN (132 LABELS) (MIA -2278) (L-762) (INV -2472) C-815 (TX -05!01101) Sljbm!H'�-" l into tiro public roccrcl in connection wit'rl n Walter Foornan City clCrk El Submittod int -o tho ptrbli� r000rrd In cr nnec"ion vilth Item .. or, Waller i°oI;rl an City clork (L -762L) (100 LABELS WITHOUT REPETITION) (ORIGINALLY 103 NAMES) KENDALL COFFEY & JONI LUIS R PAGAN JR & LAZARA MANUEL A & ROBIN S DIAZ 1639 S BAYSHORE DR 1625 S SAYSHORE DR 3524 E FAIRVIEW ST MIA FL 33133 COCONUT GR FL 33133 MIA FL 33133 PASQUALE W BENEDETTO MD MARGARET MCLAUGHLIN GASTON L & D BRUNSCHWIG 1626 MICANOPY AVE 1621 S BAYSHORE DR 3520 E FAIRVIEW ST MIA FL 33133 MIA FL 33133 MIA FL 33133 LYDIA LEE BROWNE CHATEAU APTS LTD CHARLES B & D PATRICK 3401 HALISSEE ST PO BOX 330478 16020 SW 77TH AVE MIA FL 33133 MIA FL 33233 MIA FL 33157 A J BARRANCO JR CITY OF MIA DEPT OF EDWARD J RAMOS 1629 S BAYSHORE DR P & D ASSET MGT DIV 1650 S BAYSHORE DR MIA FL 33133 444 SW 2ND AVE #325 MIA FL 33133 JANE & ALLEN L DEWEY MIA FL 33130 EDWARD SOTO & SANDRA M CHtLiANO E CASAL & EAST FAIRVIEW INC ENRIQUE & B GRATAS CARMEN Q 100 XANADU PL 3529 W FAIRVIEW ST 1632 MICANOPY AVE JUPITER FL 33477 MIA FL 33133 MIA FL 33133 CHILIANO E CASAL & EAST FAIRVIEW HOMES LLC GUS ANDY CARMEN Q 3052 SW 27 AVE #101 % MARY OAK STE #200 1632 MICANOPY AVE MIA FL 33133 3326 MARY ST MIA FL 33133 MIA FL 33133 CAROLE A GARDINER MICHAEL S GROSSMAN TR RICHARD A & M J DIPPLE 1666 MICANOPY AVE 1646 S BAYSHORE DR 3533 W FAIRVIEW ST COCONUT GROVE FL 33133 MIA FL 33133 COCONUT GR FL 33133 GILLES A E STUCKER DENTS BOULET J L& L B T DEOLAZARRA 1670 MICANOPY AVE 3550 E FAIRVIEW ST 1689 S BAYSHORE LN COCONUT GROVE FL 33133 MIA FL 33133 COCONUT GR FL 33133 JANE & ALLEN L DEWEY HENRY & W FONTELA EDWARD SOTO & SANDRA M 1645 S BAYSHORE OR 3540 E FAIRVIEW ST 1680 MICANOPY AVE MIA FL 33133 MIA FL 33133 COCONUT GROVE FL 33133 ANDREW S & M J HAGUE BRUCE W RESP GAIL W MORGOSHES 1635 S BAYSHORE DR 3530 E FAIRVIEW ST 3305 SW 17TH AVE MIA FL 33133 MIA FL 33133 MIA FL 33133 ' i c El L-762 L ELEANOR BAI_FE HANS U & A STEINER 1649 S BAYSHORE DR 2712 HLOLA ST MIA FL 33133 MIA FL 33133 0 Sukimittod Into tlro pubilc record in rown.cflon With item -PZ-., oil It-_1_T:p_t.. city i rig TAMARA G CHASICES 1637 MICANOPY AVE MIA FI_ 33133 WARREN M SALOMON COCONUT GROVE DEV INC R PARIS JR & CLAIRE 1665 S BAYSHORE OR 3215 GRAND AVE 1633 MICANOPY AVE MIA FL 33133 COCONUT GR FL 33133 MIA Fi- 33133 MICHAEL & M SPECTOR RENEE C SHAFER DIANE RELKIN PO BOX 706 1608 TIGERTAIL AVE 3330 HALISSEE ST DORADO PR 00646 MIA FL 33133 MIA FL 33133 STANLEY MARGOSHES & GAIL MICHAEL L & P FINKLE SANDOR & S LENNER 3305 SW 17TH AVE 2845 SW 17TH AVE 1630 TIGERTAIL AVE MIA FL 33133 MIA FL 33133 MIA FL 33133 ISIDRO G HUERTA & BERNABE & J S VAZQUEZ MARGARITA GUERRERO LILLIAM E 2855 SW 17TH AVE 1640 TIGERTAIL AVE 1653 BAYSHORE DR COCONUT GR FL 33133 COCONUT GR FL 33133 COCONUT GR FL 33133 MODESTO MARTIN ROYAL BAY ESTATES AT GUILLERMO RIVIERA & 2701 SW 17TH AVE MICANOPY I % AGIM JUDY VAN HEININGEN MIA FL 33133 REGISTERED AGENTS INC 1644 TIGERTAIL AVE 1200 BRICKELL AVE #900 MIA FL 33133 MIA FL 33131 DENNY BRADENBURGER STEVEN R & T MCNAMARA JOHN J & D SCHOENDORF 2711 SW 17TH AVE 7475 SW 50TH TERR 1650 TIGERTAIL AVE MIA FL 33133 MIA FL 33155 MIA FL 33133 ADRIAN RODZ & JERRY D & C BAILEY JOHN & I COPPOLA ALIETTE DEL POZO JTRS 1651 MICANOPY AVE 1654 TIGERTAIL AVE 2721 SW 17TH AVE COCONUT GR FL 33133 MIA FL 33133 MIA FL 33133 DECORO RENOVATIONS & LISA CHILDRESS PETERSEN JOSE TILLAN & INVST INC 1641 MICANOPY AVE MELANIE MASTERSON JTRS 222 NE 27TH ST MIA FL 33133 1660 TIGERTAIL AVE MIA FL 33137 MIA FL 33133 FREDERICK WHARTON BAUDER ANTHONY C & J P PIPPO J & SHIRLEY M SEITLIN 1695 TIGERTAIL AVE 1639 MICANOPY AVE 1666 TIGERTAIL AVE MIA FL 33133 COCONUT GR FL 33133 MIA FL 33133 C L-762 L RICHARD L WILLIAMS 2727 HILOLA ST MIA FL 33133 0 submitted If?LQ Cho) publie, record in connection With item P�.. on Walter Foemar>3 City Gleik VICTORIA RODRIGUEZ & TRINA DELGADO PHILLIP RODRIGUEZ 3540 G GLENCOE ST 125 GAVILAN AVE MIA FL 33,133 C GABLES FL 33143 CHRISTOPHER M SLOAN MURRAY Z KLEIN ERIC SCHERR 1651 TIGERTAIL AVE 1630 S BAYSHORE DR 3575 W GLENCOE ST COCONUT GR FL 33133 MIA FL 33133 COCONUT GROVE FL 33133 RAMON & L DEL VALLE CHARLES OF DADE CO INC JAVIER I GIRALDO 1645 TIGERTAIL AVE 5915 PONCE DE LEON BLVD 3565 W GLENCOE ST MIA FL 33133 #26 MIA FL 33133 C GABLES FL 33146 STEPHEN CLINE & MARK SEIBEL & F S EARL & KATHLEEN M GRACIELA LEON KELLY SEIBEL 1417 N VENETIAN WAY 1641 TIGERTAIL AVE 1644 S BAYSHORE DR MIA FL 33139 COCONUT GR FL 33133 MIA FL 33133 CLARISA MCGREGOR NICHOLAS P & D VALERIANI GREG EVERSOLE 1637 TIGERTAIL AVE 3515 E GLENCOE ST JULIANN MCCREADY MIA FL 33133 MIA FL 33133 3545 W GLENCOE ST MIA FL 33133 JACQUELINE HASSINE GEORGIA BELLE DEMETREE TODD M THOMPSON 1680 ONAWAY DR 3525 E GLENCOE ST 3535 W GLENCOE ST MIA FL 33133 MIA FL 33133 MIA FL 33133 HALEY E SOFGE GLENCOE REALTY LTD JOSE R M FIGUEIREDO 2705 HILOLA ST % LUIS AGRAMUNT ESQ 3501 W GLENCOE ST COCONUT GR FL 33133 80 SW 8TH ST #2000 MIA FL 33133 MIA FL 33130 CARROLL MANOR INC OSCAR L & A GAETAN FILIP & I GLITSOS % CATHOLIC HOUSE MGT 3500 E GLENCOE ST 271 N SHORE DR 3075 NW 35TH AVE MIA FL 33133 MIA BCH FL 33141 LAUD LAKES FL 33311 HERBERT LE ROY LAWSON JR ALINA M LOPEZ CARLOS A MENACHO 408 ALESIO AVE 3530 E GLENCOE ST & ANA P MCNACHO ' C GABLES FL 33134 MIA FL 33133 3520 W GLENCOE ST COCONUT GR FL 33133 ]RAJ H AFSHAR & MITRA MIGUEL ANGEL BURELO CHATEAU APTS I_TD 1610 S BAYSHORE DR 3534 E GLENCOE ST PO BOX 330478 k� + MIA FL 33133 MIA FL 33133 MIA FL 33233 �] L: J L -762L DANIEL G DIAZ 1702 S BAYSHORE DR COCONUT GR FL 33133 CHARLES J VAN DELILNDER 1701 TIGERTAIL AVE MIA FL 33133 DIANA CASTRESANA 2730 SW 17TH AVE MIA FL 33133 E PATRICK & JODI FARRELL 3330 SW 17TH AVE MIA FL 33133 MARK H KRAVETZ 1740 MICANOPY AVE MIA FL 33133 FREDERICK H & F SANDSTROM 1720 TIGERTAIL AVE COCONUT GR FL 33133 CHARLES L & H MUNSON III 1710 TIGERTAIL AVE MIA FL 33133 WAYNE E & K L STRINGER 1701 MICANOPY AVE MIA FL 33133 6 A OMAR BOTERO `4-lbrillU d Iwo tErfj pt1b1fe 3333 HALISSEE ST I•OcOl'd In connection t�jjtft COCONUT GR FL 33133 As on WdtGr Foornnn B ELEANOR TYRE 1p City ClErk 3303 HALISSEE ST 4`!� C G MIA FL 33133 IBJ SOUTH BAYSHORE LANE CONDO, 1669 S BAYSHORE LN, MIA FL 33133 (0-615L) (32 LABELS) SubmiRod into the public, rocord in connection With Item 2' A on 11-1 l- Walter F=oeman 1 city Glolu JERRY L & GAIL HALE DEBORAH L SIFFORD EUGENE P f IERMAN 1600 S BAYSHORE LN #2A 1600 S BAYSHORE LN #4C 1600 S BAYSHORE LN #7A MIA FL 33133 MIA FL 33133 MIA FL 33133 FRANCINE D HOLBROOK ANN M BRENNAN KATHLEEN DAVISON TRUST 1600 S BAYSHORE LN #213 1600 S BAYSHORE LN #4D 1600 S BAYSHORE LN #7B MIA FL 33133 MIA FL 33133 MIA FL 33133 WILLIAM A JOSE. HELENE DIAZ SUZANNE P MINNIS KELLI D NORDHUS 2025 ARCH CREEK DR 1600 S BAYSHORE LN #70 1600 S BAYSHORE LN #2C MIA FL 33181 MIA FL 33133 MIA FL 33133 CLAUDIO & J MARTINEZ WM F & LISBET G YOUN KIN ROBERT & S M USHERSON 1600 S BAYSHORE LN #2D 1600 S BAYSHORE LN 46B 1600 S BAYSHORE LN #7D MIA FL 33133 MIA FL 33133 MIA FL 33133 WILLIAM A YATES CECILIO ALVAREZ CAMERO KATHLEEN P FREDRIKSEN 1600 S BAYSHORE LN #3A AVENUE EL PARQUE QUINTA 1600 S BAYSHORE LN #8A MIA FL 33133 HOOK CARACAS CC MIA FL 33133 CARACAS VENEZUELA 00000 VRAM CORPORATION LILIANAARMAS GAIL BALDWIN PO BOX 193240 5270 NW ATH ST 1600 S BAYSHORE LN #8B SAN JQA'N PR 00919 MIA FL 33126 MIA FL 33133 ROBERT & VIRGINIA JACKO RAFAGA INC HENRY H LERNER 1600 S BAYSHORE LN #3C PO BOX 025265 1600 S BAYSHORE LN #0C MIA FL 33133 272 POBA INTERNATIONAL MIA FL 33133 MIA FL 33102 RAMON E GONZALEZ III FRANCINE D HOLBROOK CHRISTOPHER REED TOOMEY 4730 DEER RUN CT 1600 S BAYSHORE LN #613 1690 S BAYSHORE LN #2B ALEXANDRIA VA 22306 MIA FL 33133 MIA FL 33133 JANE SLACK XIMENA I CORON INMOBILIARIA SAUCE SA 1600 S BAYSHORE LN #4A 1600 S BAYSHORE LN #6C 1600 S BAYSHORE LN #9A MIA FL 33133 MIA FL 33133 MIA FL 33133 LUMINA INV % DALIA OZERI KATHLEEN P FREDRIKSEN SAINFORT FRANCOIS 320 PARK AVE 1600 S BAYSHORE LN 116D 1600 S BAYSHORE LN #{9R� J. NEW YORK NY 10022 MIA FL 33133 MIA FL 33133 CLAUDIA CORTES 1600 S BAYSHORE LN #9C MIA FL 33133 SCOTT VAN APPLEDORN SAMANTHA JMARSHAL 1600 S BAYSHORE LN #91) MIA FL 33133 2 rocord in conn(,,k,2ic3rn jp/ith iiern ort V'Valtee Fc)c`,mian City Clerk A. 1 i .l, N Al 0 _t tk 1+� r �-e 55•�,,�b 1� I. ll ��s* �M4\ ��'" � >, c=fes ��• ' y •"• n 9 .� Q p � �l ~-'_.. `�;S ��:���; ti - �fi �+ - es JL] ��'� c� rb �i.- �� �� -.. +• °' _ `" � _- _ `3 ��r'. =9'I?� � ��t -, r. D t'�� + r _ o a�.�� �� 5'"��J r• +!5;, b o- - WmI'"•}-��,9,•a;- �y�n,'; '-•ri J a �, [, J .1/ '{:�o..,. O'O� d O 9 SJ ti > x _ I ' f_�•` :�--:y> 1 F. s. 4. � � d, ��--- x � • / 1. 1 �,"A,.` �� 1'z. i — `� `s Vo — ` � � •SOS p �" o - ;,CfS In .s s>' +s 1s_ ••�s� y \L o � Y . � . _t ' tl s ,Sr%' � r �+ iG� �� >A � o i e fTl g -.•-� Y '7- 1 , ,6�''�'YS ti , 'C N-1,� t _ -A. C±�s3'..�.'" �_�Y,ltl+✓'f, ':, S :` o � � '�''1 \ i -"' - I- f_I :_ a ^^^������--- ..w L T—_x--..., Or .� ..k{14"L ;,Y t.�� ,•t'1 _ o ��, �' �9 :tai ���t, ~. 1,¢� �• .. 3. � `"�`i� •`��t� .,_ ,4,31/ n - � IS/J'. In / X. Ej j€ /ice � \\�)���' ,\ i-f�i eb,�.0�%•\ % _'�.. `�'✓�� `t•, Public d '`n wit[i �p..�F • ���,e�l��d ., ';--City Claris Submitted into tinetjbli C� c YGCOt' 1 in connection with stern Z 1 On PRICE TERRACE PB 82-46 'uValler Foeman (L-762) ()03 LABELS) 50OFT (TX -05103101) Cit'll Glo%pk LOTS 2 & 3 KENDALL COFFEY & JONI 1639 S BAYSHORE DR 1039 S BAYSHORE: DR 01-4140-009-0020 MIA FL 33133 BRICKELLS FLAGLER P6 5-44 BLOB PORT OF LOTS 10 & 11 BEG NWLY COR LOT 11 PASQUALE W BENEDETTO MD SELYIOOFT NELY52FT NWLY10OFT SWLY52FT TO POB 1626 MICANOPY AVE 1626 MICANOPY AVE MIA FL 33133 01-4139-001-1842 LOT 12 & NELY36FT OF LOT 13 LYDIA LEE BROWNE 3401 HALISSEE ST 3401 HALISSEE ST 01-4139-001-1850 MIA FL 33133 SW5FT LOT 14 LOT 15 TO 18 LOTS 37 TO 40 & A J BARRANCO JR WLY5FT LOT 41 1629 S BAYSHORE DR 1629 S BAYSHORE DR MIA FL 33133 01-4139-001-1870 JANE & ALLEN L DEWEY LOT 19 CHILIANO E CASAL & 1632 MICANOPY AVE CARMEN Q 01-4139-001-1880 1632 MICANOPY AVE LOTS 35 & 36 MIA FL 33133 LOT 20 CHILIANO E CASAL & 1636 MICANOPY AVE CARMEN Q 01-4139-001-1890 1632 MICAN 0PYAVE MIA FL 33133 LOTS 25 & 26 CAROLE A GARDINER 1666 MICANOPY AVE 1666 MICANOPY AVE 01-4139-001-1900 COCONUT GROVE FL 33133 LOTS 27 & 28 GILLES A E STUCKER 1670 MICANOPY AVE 1670 MICANOPY AVE 01-4139-Q01-1901 COCONUT GROVE FL 33133 BEG NWLY COR LOT 30 FOR POB SW110FT JANE & ALLEN L DEWEY SE 18OFT NEI 1 OFT NW180FT TO POB 1645 S BAYSHORE DR 1645 S BAYSHORE DR MIA FL 33133 01-4139-001-1920 LOTS 35 & 36 ANDREW S & M J HAGUE 1535 8 BAYSHORE DR 1635 S BAYSHORE DR 01-4139-001-1930 MIA FL 33133 A -j�� I LTJ BRICKELLS FI_AGLER P 55-44 BLOCK 67 NELY36FT OF LOT 42 & LOT 43 1625 S BAYSHORE DR 01-4139-001-1960 SE31FT OF SW 25FT LOT 10 & SE50.03FT LT 11 & LOTS 44-45-46 & 20FT ALLEY ADJ 1621 S BAYSHORE DR 01-4139-001-1840 STEELE PARK SUB PB 63-85 TRACTS A THRU C 3535 HIAWATHA AVE 01-4114-012-0010 STEELE PARK SUB PB 63-85 ELIZABETH STEELE PARK 3,121 E FAIRVIEW ST 01-4114-012-0040 FAIRVIEW A SUB PB 4-176 BLOCK 1 LOTS 1 THRU 3 3535 E FAIRVIEW ST 01-4114-001-0010 LOT 4 3520 HIAWATHA AVE 01-4114-001-0020 LOT 5 3510 HIAWATHA AVE 01-4114-001-0030 LOT 6 1646 S BAYSHORE DR 01-4114-001-0040 BLOCK 2 LOT 1 LESS N2.5FT FOR RNV 3550 E FAIRVIEW ST 01-4114-001-0050 LOT 2 LESS N2.5FT FOR RNV 3540 E FAIRVIEW ST 01-4114-001-0060 0 Subr;'llitod irlt() the pui)llc record in =lilcction vilih itern Pte• 3_ on A -15a®1._. Walter Fooman City Ciork LUIS R PAGAN JR & LAZARA 1626S BAYSHORE DR COCONUT GR FL 33133 MARGARET MCLAUGHLIN 1621 S BAYSHORE DR MIA FL 33133 CHATEAU APTS LTD PO BOX 330478 MIA FL 33233 CITY OF MIA DEPT OF P & D ASSET MGT DIV 444 SW 2ND AVE ##325 MIA FL 33130 EAST FAIRVIEW INC 100 XANADU PL JUPITER FL 33477 EAST FAIRVIEW HOMES LLC 3052 SW 27 AVE #101 MIA FL 33133 EAST FAIRVIEW HOMES LLC 3052,9W 27 AVE #101 MIA FL 33133 MICHAEL S GROSSMAN TR 1646 S BAYSHORE DR MIA FL 33133 DENIS BOULET 3650 E FAIRVIEW ST MIA FL 33133 HENRY & W FONTELA 3540 E FAIRVIEW ST MIA FL 33133 FAIRVIEW A SUS P13 4-176 BLOCK 2 LOT 3 3530 E FAIRVIEW ST 01-4114.001-0070 LOT 4 3524 E FAIRVIEW ST 01-4114-001-0071 LOT 5 3520 E FAIRVIEW ST 01-4194-001-0072 LOT 6 1648 S BAYSHORE DR 01-4114-001-0080 LOTS 7 & 8 1650 S BAYSHORE DR 01-4114-001-0090 LOT 9 LESS SWLY2.5FT FOR RNV 3529 W FAIRVIEW ST 01-4114-001-0091 LOT 10 3531 W FAIRVIEW ST 01-4114-001-0100 LOT 11 3533 W FAIRVIEW ST 01-4114-001-0102 LOTS 12 & 13 LESS SWLY 67.67FT THEREOF 1689 S BAYSHORE LN 01-4194-001-0103 9 5iabmiti,od into the pudic record in connoNot on With Rom 12,3 rent1.1=A.,P,-0.),. Waiter E ooman City C lark BRUCE W REEP 3530 E FAIRVIEW ST MIA FL 33133 MANUEL A & ROBIN S DIAZ 3524 E FAIRVIEW ST MIA FL 33133 GASTON L & D BRUNSCHWIG 3520 E FAIRVIEW ST MIA FL 33133 CHARLES B & D PATRICK 16020 SW 77TH AVE MIA FL 33157 EDWARO J RAMOS 1650 S BAYSHORE DR MIA FL 33133 ENRIQUE & B GRATAS 3529 W FAIRVIEW ST MIA FL 33133 GUS ANDY % MARY OAK STE lr200 3326 MARY ST MIA FL 33133 RICHARD A & M J DIPPLE 3533 W FAIRVIEW ST COCONUT GR FL 33133 JOHN L & L B T DEOLAZARRA 1689 S BAYSHORE LN COCONUT GR FL 33133 kjlJi)Ci'li$i i'3A0 [1L' PLIbliG reror i in cJl-tI action With CARTER-HINSON TR PB 4-90 item PA- -� Of, I'+ W alts -,,I' Foosi fE'>v) cibi ciot'ic BEG 240FTN & 65.03FTE OF SW COR OF JONATHAN EDWARD SOTO & SANDRA M LEWIS DONATHION TH E99.97FT S50FT NELY112 1680 MICANOPY AVE .25FT NWLY15FT E25FT MIL NELY184FT MIL COCONUT GROVE FL 33133 TO NWLYIL OF LOT 29 BLK 67 OF PB 5-44 SWLY ALG NWLYAL LOT 29 172.46FT SELY40FT MIL TO POB LESS BEG 451.8OFTN & 69.15FTELY & NELY OF SE COR OF NE114 OF SEV4 TH 54DEG E 8.89FT S34DEG E50.68FT W30.96FT NLY37.35FT TO POB 1680 MICANOPY AVE 01-4114-011-0020 BEG 140FTN & 15FTE OF SW COR OF JONATHAN GAIL W MORGOSHES LEWIS DONATION TH El SOFT N10OFT W99.97FT 3305 SW 17TH AVE NWLY40FT MIL TO NWLYIL LOT 29 BLK 67 PB 5.44 MIA FL 33133 SWLY ALG NWLYIL LOT 29 FOR 47.5FT M1L S110FT TO POB & BEG 451.80FTN & 69.1 SFTELY & NELY OF SE COR OF NE114 OF SE114 TH N54 DEG E8.89FT S34DEG E50.58FT W30.96FT NLY 37.35FT TO POB 3305 SW 17TI-I AVE 01-4114-011-0030 01-4114-011-0040 BEG AT MOST NLY GOR OF LOT 30 BLK 67 OF ELEANOR BALFE BRICKELLS FLAGLER PB 5-44 TH SWLY ALG NW 1649 S BAYSHORE DR BDRY OF LOTS 30 & 55 BLK 67 A DIST OF 110FT MIA FL 33133 TO POB TH SWLY ALG SAME COURSE 63.8FT TO MOST WLY COR OF SD LOT 55 TH SELY187.67FT TO NLY RNV LINE OF SO BAYSHORE DR TH NELY ALG SD RAW LINE 75.27FT TH NLY73FT TO MOST COR OF SEC 40-54-41 TH N240FT E297.12FT FOR POB TH E28FT SELY39FT NWLY55FT M/L TO POB 1649 S BAYSHORE DR S40FT OF W141.3FT OF JONATHAN LEWIS WARREN M SALOMON DONATION & BEG 15FTE OF NW COR GOV LOT 1665 S BAYSHORE DR S E210.2FT 22.7FTS TO MIAMI AVE SW ALG MIA FL 33133 MIAMI AVE 241AFT N138.4FTTO BEG 1665 S BAYSHORE DR 01-4114-011-0050 BEG 40FTN OF SW COR OF JONATHAN MICHAEL & M SPECTOR LEWIS DONATION FOR POB N10OFT PO BOX 7Q6 E165FT N50FT NELY112.25FT TO P -r DORADO PR 00646 ON WLY LINE OF H B PEACOCK TR BNG 15FTSELY OF NW COR SAID TR NWLY15FT E27.57FT TH SELY 55FT M1L TO PHONE LINE KOUBEK PLOT TH SELY 138.06FT TO S BAYSHORE DR SWLY76.61FT SLY2.77FT SWLY 112.11 FT NLY26.62FT W83.5FT N40FT W141.3FT TO POB LESS STREETS 1653 S BAYSHORE DR 01-4114-011-0010 M SPECTOR PB 151-96 STANLEY MARGOSHES & GAIL TRACT A 3305 SW 17TH AVE TRA MIA FL 33133 VACANT 01.4114-028-0010 El M SPECTOR PB 151-96 TRACT B TR B 1653 BAYSHORE DR 01-4114-028-0020 NATOMA MANORS PB 24-13 BLOCK 2 LOT 7 2701 SW 17TFI AVE 01-4114-009-0070 LOT 8 2711 SW 17TH AVE 01-4114-009-0080 LOT 9 & LOT 10 LESS S40FT 2721 SW 17TH AVE 01-4114-009-0090 LOT 11 & S40FT LOT 10 1699 TIGERTAIL AVE W -4114.009.01D0 LOT 12 & S57 il2FT LOT 13 ULK2 PB 39-25 1695 TIGERTAIL AVE 01-4114-009-0110 NATOMA MANORS RE -SUB PB 39-25 BLOCK 2 LOTS 14 & 13 LESS S57.5FT 2712 HiLOLA ST 01-41114-010-0140 LOT 15 VACANT 01-4114-010-0145 BLOCK 3 LOT 1 1698 TIGERTAIL AVE 01-4114-010-0180 LOT 2 2845 SW 17TH AVE 01-4114-010-0190 C Submitted into the public rocord in corn(%clion jraitii �t p3 oil ,:_..1E15 -Of Walter I✓(oman G ity cieA ISIDRO G HUERTA & LILLIAM E 1653 BAYSHORE DR COCONUT OR FL 33133 MODESTO MARTIN 2701 SW 17TH AVE MIA FL 33133 DENNY BRADENBURGER 2711 SW 17TH AVE MIA FL 33133 ADRIAN RODZ & ALIETTE DEL POZO JTRS 2721 SW 17TH AVE MIA FL 33133 DECORO RENOVATIONS & INVST INC 222 NE 27TH ST MIA FL 33137 FREDERICK WHARTON BAUDER 1695 TIGERTAIL. AVE MIA FL 33133 HANS U & A STEINER 2712 HILOLA ST MIA FL 33133 COCONUT GROVE DEV INC 3215 GRAND AVE COCONUT OR FL 33133 RENEE C SHAFER 1698 TIGERTAIL AVE MIA FL 33133 MICHAEL L & P FINKLE 2845 SW 17TH AVE MIA FL 33133 193 Submitt0d NO tho public; rocorcl :fit connoc-flo" with on NATOMA MANORS RE -SUB PB 39-25 pity Glod( BLOCK 3 BERNABE & J S VAZQUEZ LOTS 3 & 4 2855 SW 17TH AVE 2856 SW 17-fH AVE COCONUT GR FL 33133 01-4114-010-0200 ROYAL BAY ESTATES AT LOT 6 & W20FT LOT 7 MICANOPY I % AGIM 1675 MICANOPY AVE REGISTERED AGENTS INC 01-4114.009-0120 1200 BRICKELL AVE #900 MIA FL 33131 STEVEN R & T MCNAMARA LOT 8 9661 MICANOPY AVE 7475 SW 50TH TERR 01-4114-010-0210 MIA FL 33155 JERRY D & C BAILEY LOT 9 1651 MICANOPY AVE 1651 MICANOPY AVE COCONUT GR FL 33133 01-4114-010-0220 NAMOTA MANOR PB 24-13 BLOCK 3 LISA CHILDRESS PETERSEN LOT 10 LOTMICANOPYAVE 1641 MICANOPYAVE 1641 MIA FL 33133 01-4114009.0130 NATOMA MANORS RE -SUB PB 39-25 BLOCK 3 ANTHONY C & J P PIPPO LOT 11 LOTMICANOPY 1639 MICANOPY AVE 1639 AVE COCONUT GR FL 33133 01-41.14-010-0230 TAMARA G CHASKES LOT 12 1637 MICANOPY AVE 1637 MICANOPY AVE MIA FL 33133 01-4114-010-0240 NATOMA MANORS RE -SUB PB 39-25 BLOCK 3 RICARDO PARES JR &CLAIRE LOT 13 LOTMICANOPY 1633 MICANOPY AVE 1633 AVE MIA FI. 33933 01-4114-010-0250 NATOMA MANORS PB 24-13 BLOCK 3 DIANE RELi<IN LOT 15 3330 HALISSEE ST 1631 MICANOPY AVE MIA FL 33133 01-4114-009-0140 DIANE RELKIN OT17 LS 16 & LOTS 3330 HALISSEE ST ST MIA FL 33133 01-4114-009-0141 0 ,ubmittcd into the public rowed in ccr�c11an with L"��_ NATOMA MANORS PB 24-13 WgItc-g FUF'marl BLOCK 3 oily 0e100( JACK & SHIRLEY M SEITLIN LOT 26 SANDOR & S LENNER LOTS 18 & 19 1630 TIGERTAIL AVE 1630 TIGERTAIL AVE MIA FL 33133 01-4114-009-0150 LOT 20 & LOT 21 BLK 3 NATOMA MANORS RE -SUB MARGARITA GUER REPO 1640 TIGERTAIL AVE PER PS 39 25 COCONUT GR FL 33133 1640 TIGERTAIL AVE MIA FL 33133 01-4114-009.0170 NATOMA MANORS RESUB PB 39-25 GUILLERMO RIVIERA & BLOCK 3 JUDY VAN HEININGEN LOT 22 1644 TIGERTAIL AVE 1644 TIGERTAIL AVE MIA FL 33133 01-4114-010.0270 JOHN J & D SCHOENDORF LOT 23 1650 TIGERTAIL AVE 1650 TIGERTAIL AVE MIA FL 33133 01-4114-010-0280 isLOT JOHN & l COPPOLA 24 TIGERTAIL AVE 1654 TIGERTAIL AVE MIA FL 33133 MIA 01-4114-010-0290 JOSE TILLAN & LOT 25 MELANIE MASTERSON JTRS 1660 TIGERTAIL AVE 1660 TIGERTAIL AVE 01-4114-010.0300 MIA FL 33133 JACK & SHIRLEY M SEITLIN LOT 26 1666 TIGERTAIL AVE 1666 TIGERTAIL AVE MIA FL 33133 01-4114-010-0310 NATOMA MANORS RESUB PB 39-25 BLOCK4 RICHARD LWILLIAMS LOT 1 & W15FT OF LOT 2 2727 HILOLA ST 2727 HILOLA ST MIA FL 33133 01-4114-010-0320 E60FT OF LOT 2 &SWLY 10FT OF LOT 3 CHRISTOPHER M SLOAN1651 TIGERTAIL AVE 1651 TIGERTAIL AVE COCONUT GR FL 33133 01-4114-010-0330 RAMON & L DEI_ VALLE LOT 3 LESS SWLY 14FT 1645 TIGERTAIL AVE 1645 TIGERTAIL AVE MIA FL 33133 Is 01-4114.010-0340 GLENCOE A SUB PB 5-119 BLOCK 1 HERBERT LE ROY LAWSON JR 408 ALES10 AVE LOT 1 1600 S BAYSHORE OR C GABLES FL 33134 01-4114-008-0010 0 LOT 2 'iU 1l]'-� s]1 bliC 1606 S BAYSHORE DR r@Cord in 01-4114-008-0020 �. 3 Or, item W.,11tet t a�aE ri ri LOTS 3 & 4 c'ity;iiic NATOMA MANORS RESUS PB 39 - MIA FL 33133 BLOCK 4 LOT 4 STEPHEN CLINE & 1641 TIGERTAIL AVE GRACIELA LEON 1641 TIGERTAIL AVF 01-4114-010-0350 COCONUT GR FL 33133 LOT 5 CLARISA MCGREGOR 1637 TIGERTAIL AVE 1637 TIGERTAIL AVE 01-4114-010-0360 MIA FL 33133 JACQUELINE HASSINE LOT 11 1680 ONAWAY DR 1680 ONAWAY DR MIA FL 33133 01-4114-010-0390 LOT 12 HALEY E SOFGE 2705 HILOLA ST 2705 HILOLA ST COCONUT GR FL 33133 01-4114-010-0400 VIZCAYA PB 34-46 BEG 40FT NELY OF MOST WLY COR TR 4 TH SELY 7251T CARROLL MANOR INC NELY 323.60FT NWLY 60FT NELY 4.12 NWLY 665FT CATHOLIC HOUSE MGT SWLY FT TO POB 3075 NW 35TH AVE 3667 S MIAMI AVE IAM LAUD LAKES FL 33311 01-4114-005-0063 GLENCOE A SUB PB 5-119 BLOCK 1 HERBERT LE ROY LAWSON JR 408 ALES10 AVE LOT 1 1600 S BAYSHORE OR C GABLES FL 33134 01-4114-008-0010 HERBERT LE ROY LAWSON JR LOT 2 408 ALESIO AVE 1606 S BAYSHORE DR C GABLES FL 33134 01-4114-008-0020 IRAJ H AFSHAR & MITRA LOTS 3 & 4 1610 S BAYSHORE DR 1610 S BAYSHORE DR MIA FL 33133 01-4114-008-0030 LOTS 5-6-7 LESS SELY5FT OF LOTS 6 & 7 VICTORIA RODRIGUEZ & PHILLIP RODRIGUEZ 1616 S BAYSHORE DR 125 GAVILAN AVE 01-4114-008-0050 C GABLES FL 33143 MURRAY Z KLEIN LOT 8 & 9 1630 S BAYSHORE DR 1630 S BAYSHORE DR MIA FL 33133 01.4114-008-0060 GLENCOE A SUB PB 5-119 BLOCK 1 LOTS 10 TO 12 1640 S BAYSHORE OR 01-4114-008-0070 LOTS 13 & 14 1644 S BAYSHORE DR 01.411,4-008-0080 BLOCK 2 LOT 1 3515 E GLENCOE ST 01-4114-008-0090 LOTS 2 THRU 6 3525 E GLENCOE. ST 01.4114-008-0100 LOTS 7-8-9-& 10 3531 E GLENCOE ST 01-4114-008-0150 BLOCK 3 LOTS 1 THRU 3 3600 E GLENCOE ST 01-4114-008-0250 LOTS 4 TO 6 3630 E GLENCOE ST 01-4114-008-0280 SOTS 7 THRU 9 3534 E GLENCOE ST 01-4114-008-0310 LOTS 10-11 & 12 3540 E GLENCOE ST 01-4114-008-0340 LOTS 118, 19 3575 W GLENCOE ST 01-4114-008-0400 ubrnittcd into tho public rGCOI'd is-Iiau'r1 Vi111ii On city Cali fit CHARLEE OF DADE CO INC 5915 PONCE DE LEON BLVD #26 C GABLES FL 33146 MARK SEIBEL & KELLY SEIBEL 1644 S BAYSHORE DR MIA FL 33133 NICHOLAS P & D VALERIANI 3515 E GLENCOE ST MIA FL 33133 GEORGIA BELLE DEMETREE 3525 E GLENCOE ST MIA FL 33133 GLENCOE REALTY LTO % LUIS AGRAMUNT ESQ 80 SW STH ST #2000 MIA FL 33130 OSCAR L & A GA£TAN 3500 E GLENCOE ST MIA FL 33133 ALINA M LOPEZ 3530 E GLENCOE ST MIA FL 33133 MIGUEL ANGEL BURELO 3534 E GLENCOE ST MIA FL 33133 TRINA DELGADO 3540 E GLENCOE ST MIA FL 33133 ERIC SCHERR 3575 W GLI=NCOE ST COCONUT GROVE FI- 33133 subs 'liiicd ii'to tho public ® f0001'd ir7 with item Pz- Or, IA -ml Waiicr Fc=c;man GLENCOE A SUB PB 6-119 City tiled( BLOCK 3 #+ & 2i JAVIER I GIRALDO LOTS 20 GLENCOE 5T 3565 W GLENCOE ST 3585 W& 211 01.4114-008-0420 MIA FL 33133 23 FRANKS S EARL & KATHLEEN M LOTS 22 & 1417 N VENETIAN WAY 3555 W GLENCOE ST 01-4114-008-0440 MIA FL 33139 LOTS 24 & 25 GREG EVERSOLE 545 W GLST JULIANN MCCREADY 3 3545 GLENCOE 3545 W GLENCOE ST MIA FL 33133 CARLOS A MENACHO LOTS 2 & 3 & ANA P MENACHO 3520 W GLENCOE ST 3520 W GLENCOE ST 01-4114-008-0500 COCONUT GR FL 33133 TODD M LOTS 26 & 27 & SELY V2 LOT 28 S EST GLENCOE 3535 W GLENCOE ST MIA L 3133 MIA FL 33133 01-4114-008-0470 KLOEBER BAY FRONT SEC 2 PB 4-196 LOT NE OF LOT 43 AND PROP INT JOSE R M FIGUI-IREDO LOT 28 LESS SELY 112 & ALL LOT 29 3501 W GLENCOE ST 3501 W GLENCOE ST MIA FL 33133 01-4114008-0460 BLOCK 4 FILIP & I GLITSOS LOT 1 271 N SHORE DR 3510 W GLENCOE ST MIA BCH FL 33141 01-4114-008-0490 CARLOS A MENACHO LOTS 2 & 3 & ANA P MENACHO 3520 W GLENCOE ST 3520 W GLENCOE ST 01-4114-008-0500 COCONUT GR FL 33133 s.;t° �?: CHATEAU APTS. LTD LOTS 8 & 9 PO BOX 330478 3550 W GLENCOE ST MIA FL 33233 01-4114-008-0560 KLOEBER BAY FRONT SEC 2 PB 4-196 LOT NE OF LOT 43 AND PROP INT DANIEL G DIAZ UNNUMBERED IN & TO COMMON ELEMENTS NOT DEDICATED TO PUBLIC E DR COCONUT GR 1702 S BAYSHORR DR 3133 1702 S BAYSHORE DR 01-4115-022-0070 SILVER BLUFF PB 1-158 CHARLES J VAN DELILNDER LOT 1 LESS E20FT & LESS 8E10FT FOR ST 1701 TIGERTAIL AVE 1701 TIGERTAIL AVE MIA FL 33133 01-4115-017-0010 s.;t° �?: SILVER BLUFF PB 1-158 LOT 2 & THAT PORT OF SECOFFEE AVE NOW CLOSED LYG N OF SAME 2730 SW 17TH AVE 0114116-017-0020 LOT B AS PER PB 1-77 LESS NWLY100FT & LESS BEG AT SW COR NWLY242.15FT ALG WLY1L NELY128,29FT S247,11FT ALGIL 3330 SW 17TH AVE 01-4115-017-0230 N10OFT OF LOT S LESS W1OFT 1700 MICANOPY AVE 01-4115-017-0240 E M PATTISON5 PB 6-14fi LOT 4 LESS NLYIOFT FOR RIW & E50FT OF SWLY10OFT OF LOT 6 BLK A 1720 TIGERTAIL AVE 01-4115-019-0030 LOT 5 & 6 LESS SWLY OR 11735-315 0383 6 1710 TIGERTAIL AVE 01-4115-019-0040 BLOCK A LOT 7 1701 MICANOPY AVE 01-4115-019-0050 NATOMA MANORS RE SUB PB 39-25 BLOCK 11 'LOT 1 & SWLY 15FT LOT 2 & NELY 6OFT LOT 2 3333 HALISSEE ST 01-4114-010-0840 LOT 19 3303 HALISSEE ST 01-4114-010-0930 Submittod into the public record in c onnociion with stern P_Z- � - oil 11-05701- Walton- 1-057d1- Walton- � 'oomnn City (nock DIANA CASTRESANA 2730 SW 17TH AVE MIA FL 33133 E PATRICK & JODI FARRELL 3330 SW 17TH AVE MIA FL 33133 MARK H KRAVETZ 1700 MICANOPY AVE MIA FL 33133 FREDERICK H & F SANDSTROM 1720 TIGERTAIL AVE COCONUT GR FL 33133 CHARLES L & H MUNSON III 1710 TIGERTAIL AVE MIA FL 33133 WAYNE E & K L STRINGER 1701 MICANOPY AVE MIA FL 33133 OMARBOTERO 3333 HALISSEE ST COCONUT GR FL 33133 B ELEANOR TYRE 3303 HALISSEE ST MIA FL 33133 SOUTH BAYSHORE LANE CONDO 1600 S BAYSHORE LN MIA FL 3313_3 LOTS 1 & 2. BLOCK 3 FAIRVIEW SUB PB 4-176 (C-815) (32 UNITS) F01-4114-014 (D-05101) 2A 213 2C 217 3A 3B 3C 3D 4A 0 413 0 €irabmit:tecl into the p"blic rocord ir) OONNec illon with item 84-n5- on Walter ! oornen city clerk JERRY L & GAIL HALE 1600 S BAYSHORE LN #2A MIA FL 33133 FRANCINE D HOLBROOK 1600 S BAYSHORE LN #26 MIA FL 33133 WILLIAM A JOSE KELLI D NORDHUS 1600 S BAYSHORE LN #2C MIA FL 33133 CLAUDIO & J MARTINEZ 1600 S BAYSHORE LN 112D MIA FL 33133 WILLIAM A YATES 1600 S BAYSHORE LN #3A MIA FL 33133 VRAM CORPORATION PO BOX 193240 SAN JUAN PR 00919 ROBERT & VIRGINIA JACKO 1600 5 BAYSHORE LN #3C MIA FL 33133 RAMON E GONZALEZ III 4730 DEER RUN CT ALEXANDRIA VA 22306 JANE SLACK 1600 S BAYSHORE LN #4A MIA FL 33133 LUMINA INV DALIA OZERI 320 PARK AVE NEW YORK NY 10022 Submittod into tho publio MOM it) connection With W lt'Or l=oeman SOUTH BAYSHORE LANE CONDO, 1600 S BAYSHORE LN, MIA FL 33133 (3Ity clod( C-815 �� -�1h�. DEBORAH L SIFFORD 4C 1600 S BAYSHORE LN #4C MIA FL 33133 ANN M BRENNAN 4D 1600 S BAYSHORE LN #4D MIA FL 33133 HELENE DIAZ 5A 2025 ARCH CREEK DR MIA FL 33181 WM F & LISBET G YOUNKIN 58 1600 S BAYSHORE LN #58 MIA FL 33133 CECILIO ALVAREZ CAMERO 5C AVENUE EL PARQUE QUINTA HOOK CARACAS CC CARACAS VENFZUFLA 00000 LILIANA ARMAS 5D 5270 NW 4TH ST MIA FL 33126 RAFACAINC 6A PO BOX 025255 272 POBA INTERNATIONAL MIA FL 33102 FRANCINE D HOLBROOK 6B 1600 S BAYSHORE LN 466 MIA FL 33133 XIMENA I CORON 6C 1600 S BAYSHORE LN #6C MIA FL 33133 KATHLEEN P FREDRIKSEN 6D 1600 S BAYSHORE LN #6❑ MIA FL 33133 �� -�1h�. SuEimittod into tito pohlip r'ocord In cojjrioc,141()n with item -3 urs Walv..,r Fooman Fully QN'14 SOUTH BAYSHORE LANE CONDO, 1600 S BAYSHORE LN, MIA FL 33133 C-815 EUGENE P LIERMAN 7A 1600 S BAYSHORE LN #7A MIA FL 33133 KATHLEEN DAVISON TRUST 713 1600 S BAYSHORE LN #713 MIA FL 33133 SU7.ANNE P MINNIS 7C 1600 S BAYSHORE LN #7C MIA FL 33133 ROBERT & S M USHERSON 7D 1600 S BAYSHORE LN 47D MIA FL 33133 KATHLEEN P FREDRIKSEN 8A 1600 S BAYSHORE LN #8A MIA FL 33133 GAIL BALDWIN 86 1600 S BAYSHORE LN 11813 MIA FL 33133 HENRY H LERNER 8C 1600 S BAYSHORE LN #8C MIA FL 33133 CHRISTOPHER REED TOOMEY 8D 1690 S BAYSHORE LN #P28 MIA FL 33133 INMOBILIARIA SAUCE SA 9A 1600 S BAYSHORE LN #9A MIA FL 33133 SAINFORT FRANCOIS 913 1600 S BAYSHORE- LN #EJB MIA FL 33133 C SOUTH BAYSHORE LANE CONDO, 1600 S BAYSHORF LN, MIA FL 33133 C-815 9C 9D ubmitted into the public record in conneeflo 1 with item _ P�'3 on !- ►.lr--OA— Walter f oornan City Glorlt CLAUDIA CORTES 1600 S BAYSHORE LN #9C MIA FL 33133 SCOTT VAN APPLEDORN SAMANTHA J MARSHAL 1600 S BAYSHORE LN 49D MIA FL 33133 E E E Or lba Departimt of §�tatp I certify from the records of this office that THE ROYAL BAY GROUP, L.L.C., is a limited liability company organized under the laws of the State of Florida, filed on July 31, 2000. The document number of this company is L00000009091. I further certify that said company has paid all fees due this office through December 31, 2000, and its status is active. CR2E022 (1-99) Submitted fnto tho public, record in U–on o—I ion with atom _ 2-A on Walter Foernan City Clork Given under my hand and the Great Seal of the State of Florida at Tallahassee, the Capitol, this the Twenty-fifth day of January, 2001 cftz� - Serrela � of trete �. Mae Department of OttttP I certify the attached is a true and correct copy of Articles of Organization of THE ROYAL_ BAY GROUP, L.L.C., a limited liability company, organized under the laws of the State of Florida, filed on July 31, 2000, as shown by the records of this office. The document number of this company is L00000009091. ME022 (1-99) Submittt,._ x'10 public record 3r; with item . r.- on 1I- 1- p_ . 'A altw Foeman Litt' Clerk Given under my hand and the Great Seal of the State of Florida at Tallahassee, the Capitol, this the Twenty-fifth day of January, 2001 jc!-IIA4�j"a �ttri=r� ��,:►•�tr�r� nf�trzte 3 LI 11 ARTICLES OF ORGAN17AUON OF THE ROYAL BAY GROUP, L.L.G. Th* for thegnrQosc of forming a limited liability company under floe Florida 7[ invited Liability' Company Act, P.S. aapter 60B, hemby make, acimowledge, and isle thecn� - following Articles of Dxgauizaflon. rnn ARTICLE I — NAME Tho nunie of ft limited liability company shalt be TU Royal Bay Group, LX.C. "Company")• �c, p AltUCLE 11-- ADDRESS The walling address and street address of this ptincspal office of the Company shall baa 010 Brickcll Avenue, Suite 504, Miami, Florida 33131, ARTICLE 1H -- DURATION Tho Company shall commence its existence on the date thew articles of organization aro filed with tho Plorsda Deparawnt of State. The Com y's existence shall be pmpetual unless t115 company is earlier dissolved as provided in these Aitioles of Organization. 0 ARTIC LS IV -- RMISTEPM OFFICE AND AMNT The name and street address of the resgisstemd agent of the Company in tke Stats of Florida is AGR4 Registered Agents, inc., 1200 Dflakoll Avcnue, Suite 900, Miami, Florida 33131. A'f TicLE v — CAPITAL CONTRIBLMONS Tics members of the company shall oontribute to the capital of the Comprury the cash or ptoperty set forth in and descrlbed in the Limited Liability Company Operaring A.grecnaent on file at the office of the Co=pany Mel "Operating Agremiiine'). ARTICLE VI ADX MONAL CAMAL C;OI+I' MMU MONS niab member sball make additional caphal. contributions to the Company only on the consent of tits members as sat forth in the Operating Agreement. Submitted into the publiv, record in connoction with item .--3_— on /EFT -o . Walter F=orman City Cleo< 3 El J H00000040167 ARTICLE Vrl —ADMISSION OF NEW MLM%WS No additional members shall be admitted to tho Company unless done so porstutnt to tbo tuns of #ho Operating Agreement. A member may only transfer his or her interest in ft Company as set forth in tho Rzgulatlons and Operating Agreement of tha Company. AIZ77CLU VW — TERMINATION OF MSUN'CB The Company shall be dissolved on tha death,' bankruptcy, or diasoiution of a =MW. manager, or on the occurrence of any othor event that terminates the continued p10Mb0rShiP o IWMber in tho Company, unless the businras of tho company is continued by tha c4mSent of twining members, provided there axe at least two zemaini ng mambcis or the remaining Yner�h_ is the managing mernmr, n' ART cLLIX--lviANAWMl?NT �1�' 'ice Company shall bo managed by a manager in =ordartce with tho ArdoIcs of Organizatitm, the Operating Axement: the Regulations adopted by ft iwmbers forthe =rn 1men of the. businoss and tho ordinary and gustomary affairs of 0W Compww. The � tiansand tba Operating Agement may contain any provisions for the, tegulation and mmngeme4t of thio a fain of the company not inconsistent wit4 tl&, laW *V these Artiolos of Otgartizafion. Tho initial Manager of the Company shall be: Robmt F, Thorne IN Wl'1'MS WIM,.l2 OF, the undersigned organbmx has and subscribed theca Articles of at Miami, Florida. tbis .J— day of 16! 20W. Ulu M. sb".m"La --V R,A. Vemandek as aitomw in STATE OF FLORIDA )SS'. C013NW OF MIAMI-DAOE ) The foregoing instrunaant was aeknoarledged bi£aro me this .. 71 day of 2000 by Randy A, Fernandez. He is personally knowZbP r red r►a as idohcation. 4 p&& u A,tt Ilava W &WF�421Mm 2 H00000040167 record in conilection with item z- or, Walter Focman . { 3 4 City Clerk C r— c� w �a cn record in conilection with item z- or, Walter Focman . { 3 4 City Clerk H00000040107 �•�.�_.����- • ���r r:� •-ay •• . • mar Having ben named the, registered apnt for the above aozporatiaa at the plane designated in ttre foregoing Articles of Organization, X hereby wxW the ane and agree to act in this Capacity, and ag" to comply with the provisions of Morida law relative to leeapiag the registered office even. AGIM RMISTERED AGENTS, JNC. 120D Drickell Ave=e, Suite 900 Miami, Florida 33131 By: r— 4 Mad*A.1 Jdcnt by R.A. Fern z as attorney in fact WPD MDP2273, V vs CM r-� d �� w 55 --{ N :5m r -n 3• Cio public rocord in i-.onnocl on with item oil & 1 -no Walton Foeman .. " . ` : City Clerk 0 J ® Suballifcd info the public record in connorfion with item 2» on lb -l" - Walter Foervian t_'_ City Cleric' DIRECTORY OF PROJECT PRINCIPALS THE ROYAL BAY GROUP, LLC Applicant: The Royal Bay Group LLC 1110 Brickell Avenue, Suite 504 Miami, Florida 33131 Telephone: (786) 777-0771 Fax: (786-777-0774 Frank Amedia, Robert Thorne Architect: Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. 2601 South Bayshore Drive Suite 10th Floor Miami, Florida 33133 Telephone: (305) 859-2050 Fax: (305) 859-9638 Willy Bermello (305) 860-3735 Willy_Bermello@bamiami.com Tere Garcia (305) 860-3758 Tere_Garcia@bamiami.com Vivian Bonet (305) 860-3762 Vivian—Bonet@bamiami.com Landscape Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. Architect: 2601 South Bayshore Drive Suite 10th Floor Miami, Florida 33133 Telephone: (305) 800-3729 Fax: (305) 859-9638 Elizabeth Newland (Landscape Architect) Elizabeth—Newland@bamiami.com TrafficlCivil: Jackson M. Ahlstedt, P,E. 46 N.W. 94'" Street Miami Shores, Florida 33150 Telephone: (305) 754-8695 Fax: (305) 754-8695 Jackson M, Ahlstedt Economist; Lambert Advisory 2601 S. Bayshore Drive, Suite 300D Miami, Florida 33133 Telephone: (305) 860-3715 Fax: (305) 860-3777 Paul Lambert Plambert@lamberadvisory, cam Attorneys: Greenberg Traurig, P.A. 1221 Brickell Avenue Miami, Florida 33131 Telephone: (305) 579-0683 Fax: (305) 061-5683 Adrienne Friesner Pardo, Esq. pardoa@gtlaw.com Submitted Into the oubilry record in connoctioi., bvlth rtes, - a1 - 5- on .!L Wr�tite;r �"oerr�er� j �: city Clad{ iC o 'Or into the public recurd in conna-tion with Itom PZ -3 on W-ISIZAL Walter Foeman i _ _L _ City Clerk I Dg*rnber.7, ?DAO AdriOnria Pardo;' q: �Gr..ochberg Traurlg, P,A, 1.22VE ickell Avenue ' Mla ' FlOHda 33131 major un zspe�lal Permit, fQr propQ'4ty.100sted Opprox m2toly at 1841 8, Bay�hpt' D6VO and 1540•M16a'nopy .: quer Ms..p�rdo: • •, , ' , This lOtli t 13erV03 to 416160 you that cmahb&V, Yrourig hiA.5, tho' author�y,.t s Major: U&o Speolal Permit apoloAon for a �j ur',ia'rBil�p.rtitlal piar7T)eid urtit,dbvelq. AAd lt'to, boJoeated at '1 11 8'. Zlayshom Wive and 16411 -V.Ic ropy„Miami, Florida, ' I urrderstand, �hat'`itje aPDltcaliQn will be frlod on behalf of tile nwner and TheRoyal a,ay: the proposed-prrGssar ofa prap.cfy, lt. i My urid aratanding thjAt Thb Royal, SAY Group,- t,.�� will he paying for'�ll., ap ilc�t`;orz fess, as well 4is for ail•legal fWs ea?6i } 6y GreeftoIro Tr�uriq *d tl`rRt'l will; ngt•be rojapenslble foi 'any absta or fees t.0 Grdon e'sq Yrduft. Very truly yo 0 j ,jubmiN,', !r't 'c .f. p rbllo ;recoM Lr '•�f f'�'}r 10.11.1 th on ti altar Foorflan 5 �r . �' `y City cleric 0 rn VJ �0p1 N THE ROYAL_ GAY GROUP MAJOR USE SPECIAL. PERMIT PROJECT DESCRIPTION ARTICLE II. Project Description A. Zoning Ordinance No, 11000 1. Section 1304.2.1 2, Section 1702.2.1 3. Section 1702.2.2 4. Section 1702.2.3 Application forms; supplementary materials General Report Major Use Special Permit Concept Plan Development Impact Study Submitted into the public record in,vnccEicjn with iltefil P—,—E- 13 on 4lJr a i'r (--CJE)man t- kf clod( 1. E 0 ROYAL DAY PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT Section 1304.1.1 Application forms; supplementary materials (a) Statements of ownership and control of the proposed development of activity. The Disclosure of Ownership and Ownership Affidavit are provided in Article I. (b) Statement describing in detail the character and intended use of the development or activity. The applicant Royal Bay Group is the contract purchaser of the Property and proposes to develop Royal Bay Estates as a Planned Unit Development pursuant to Article 5 of the Zoning Ordinance. The project will have (4) four luxury single-family homes. The project is located at 1641 South Bayshore Drive and 1640 Micanopy Avenue, in Coconut Grove. The property presently has one large home with a detached structure. There is also a tennis court and swimming pool with a deck plus a parking area. The property is located in what is commonly known as the North Grove. It extends from South Bayshore Drive to Micanopy Avenue to the northwest. It is northeast of SW 17th Avenue and southwest of the emergency entrance to Mercy Hospital. The net lot area is 47,250 square feet (1.08 acres), The gross lot area is 55,314 square feet (1.27 acres). The zoning designation for the property is Single Family (R-1) with SD -18.1 and SD -3 Overlay designations. The development will contain four homes. Only one home will front South Bayshore Drive and will maintain its existing setback of 132 feet. The setback requirement is 70 feet, thus providing 62 more feet than what is required. The developer is also maintaining the existing home at the request of the Planning Department and the neighborhood, as well as including an addition to the existing home. The view from South Bayshore will remain as is with one large single family home. The bluff will not be altered in any way, and will be maintained as is. There will be three single family homes located on Micanopy Avenue. The appearance from Micanopy will be of the same rhythm, scale and massing as found along that street. Subnniac,j 1(1-'A tilt public rocord in conne1cflon with ito n a•3 . of) "---L- 934 --L- Walter Foornan . '7 4� r. Chy Clod, 1 The proposed project will have two separate points of ingress and egress. One at South Bayshore Drive located at the existing entrance in order not to impact the bluff. This entrance is being slightly modified to meet the requirements of the Fire Department. Approximately five feet of rubble wall and one of two rubble stone piers are being removed, which is not deemed to be part of the original wall. A new rubble stone pier will be erected at the new width location. This entrance will only be for the home fronting South Bayshore Drive. The second point of entry will be from Micanopy Avenue. Both entrances are proposed to be' gated with bilateral sliding gates with a security card access and audio monitored system. A five foot required setback will be provided for the interior side yards. The required setback from South Bayshore Drive is seventy (70) feet. The proposed structure will provide 132 feet in order to avoid altering the trees presently located within this setback. The required and proposed setback from Micanopy Avenue is twenty feet. The design of the homes is in keeping with a classical Mediterranean style of architecture and the residences will range in size from four thousand to six thousand square feet. c) General location map, showing relation of the site or activity for which special permit is sought to major streets, schools, existing utilities, shopping areas, important physical features in and adjoining the project or activity and the like. The following exhibits are included with the Major Use Special Permit Application: (1) Aerial: Aerial photograph of the surrounding area indicating the project site. (2) Area Context Map/Site Aerial: Map of the project area indicating buildings and their functions that surround the site. (3) Location Map: Map of the surrounding street system indicating the project location. (d) A site plan containing the title of the project and the names of the project planner and developer, date, and north arrow, and which is based on an exact survey of the property drawn to a scale of sufficient size to show: Sti) niitocl ;nto the, public rocord gyri (xlnnection with Item F on J[-4�!-&- 2 Walter Foos'rian �� 3 4- Ciiy am( The general information requested is shown on the Site Plan, provided under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. The site plan includes the following: (1) Boundaries of the project, any existing streets, buildings, watercourses, easements and section lines; The boundaries of the project and the location of existing streets and easements are shown on the Survey located under Tab 5 of the Supporting Documents. (2) Exact location of all buildings and structures, The property presently has one large home with a detached structure. This structure was originally a garage with living quarters above it. There is also a tennis court and swimming pool with a deck plus a parking area. See Boundary Survey located under Tab 5. The location of the homes to be constructed are shown on the Site Plan, Sheets located under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (3) Access and traffic flow and how vehicular traffic will be separated from pedestrian and other types of traffic. Vehicular access for residents, visitors and service vehicles will occur at both South Bayshore Drive and Micanopy Avenue. Pursuant to the Traffic Impact Analysis, there will be no adverse impact on traffic, pursuant to this development. A detailed analysis of the site access and traffic flow is provided in the Traffic impact Analysis located under Tab 2 of the Supporting Documents. (4) Offstreet parking and offstreet loading areas; The three homes fronting Micanopy will have two (2) car garages and will have additional parking for two (2) cars in each driveway. The home fronting South Bayshore Drive will have a three (3) car garage. The parking is shown under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (5) Recreational facilities locations; There are no common recreational areas within the project. Each residence will have a poollspa, deck and landscaped gardens. _ Subr�,::L..., —.-) public record in tuith !tern 01'1 c"ierk These facilities are shown on the Site Plan and on the Landscape Plan located under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (6) Screens and buffers; Royal Bay Estates will be buffered and screened from South Bayshore Drive by the enhancement of landscaping being proposed, and by the existing coral rock wall, keeping intact the bluff. (7) Refuse collections areas; Waste collection will be provided by a private collection company and will be picked up in front of each home. (8) Access to utilities and points of utilities hookups. Access and connections to site utilities are discussed in the Site Utility Study located under Tab 3 of the Supporting Documents. (9) Landscaping IF The proposed development minimizes the number of trees being removed. It is proposed to retain 38 out of the 61 trees existing on the site. This will be enhanced by the addition of 112 trees and palms for a total of 150 trees and palms. The trees to be removed are mostly exotic, non-native trees. The few native trees that are being removed are in moderate to poor condition due to improper tree maintenance after Hurricane Andrew, as well as topping and trimming for utility lines, and lack of care over time. Many of those trees have decay and rotting conditions, which can lead to instability, and unsafe conditions. East of the existing building line at South Bayshore Drive two trees are being removed to provide the twenty foot required access for fire vehicles. Only seventeen trees are being removed and 112 trees and palms are being added. Amongst the trees that are being added as part of the project are Gumbo Limbos, Live Oaks, Poincianas, Wax Myrtles, Coconut Palms, Royal Palms, and Alexander Palms Landscape Plans can be found under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. :;t€braiiud into ilrtc; public rocord In cunvie:tlon with aOn aiti;i i=ooatan 3 4!city Glork (e) Tabulations of total gross acreage in the project and the percentages thereof proposed to be devoted to: (1) The various permitted uses; Land Use for the site will be single-family residences. (2) Ground coverage by structures The ground coverage of the structures is 11,500 square feet. The permitted building footprint 22,126. The building footprint provided is almost one-half less than what is allowed. (f) Tabulation showing the following: (1) The derivation of numbers of offstreet parking and offstreet loading spaces shown in (d) above; Three residences will have two (2) car garages, plus 2 additional parking spaces in each driveway and one residence will have a three (3) car garage plus additional parking. (2) Total project density in dwelling units per acre. Total project density allowed is nine (9) units per net acre, which would permit 9 units. Project density being provided is four (4) units per acre, totaling 4 units. (g) If common facilities (such as recreation areas of structures, private streets, common open space, etc.) are to be provided for the development, statements as to how such common facilities are to be provided and permanently maintained. The Condominium Association will maintain all common driveways and green areas. (h) Storm drainage and sanitary sewerage plans. Storm drainage, water distribution, wastewater and solid waste generation provisions are discussed in the Site Utility Study located under Tab 3 of the Supporting Documents. (i) Architectural definitions for buildings in the development; exact number of dwelling units, sizes, and types, together with typical floor plans of each type. Cubmittod into the public record in conneo'lon with itern Or' 5fi A 4y ,•, Vi�raft ., Foonian Q c . t folk Detailed information and breakdown of square footages for all uses iare found under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. Typical floor plans for the residences are shown on the Architectural Plans. The interior floor plans will be finalized prior to the issuance of the building permits. All drawings are located under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (j) Plans for signs, if any. Signage will be submitted at a later date. (k) Landscaping plan, including types, sizes and locations of vegetation and decorative shrubbery, and showing provisions for irrigation and future maintenance. All landscape plans are located under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. The Condominium Association will provide maintenance of all landscaped areas. (I) Plans for recreation facilities, if any, including location and general description of buildings for such use. There are no common recreational facilities. (m) Such additional data, maps, plans, or statements as may be required for the particular use or activity involved. The drawings submitted with this Application are found under Tab 6. (n) Such additional data as the applicant may believe is pertinent to the proper consideration of the site and development plan. Sections and elevations depicting the architectural character of the buildings are shown on the Buildings Elevations and are located under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. 2. Section 1702.2.1 General Report. (a) Property ownership and beneficial interest within the boundaries of the area proposed for Major Use Special Permit. Statement of Ownership and beneficial interest within the boundaries of the area proposed for Major Use Special Permit are provided in Article I. (b) The nature of the unified interest or control. Sufir„iYi; cl i VO f,'10 public roeord in conne,,flon with stern �?�.., On 11~_ttr'Ot—. G Waltor F=oorrfan :... `3 City Clerk J ® There will be a Condominium Association to maintain security, landscaping, contract services, and the common areas. (c) Survey of the proposed area showing property lines and ownership. A copy of the Survey is included under Tab 5 of the Supporting Documents. (d) Map of existing features, including streets, alleys, easements, utilities lines, existing land use, general topography, and physical features. The existing site features and utility lines are shown on the Boundary Survey of the property located under Tab 5. The site features and the utilities are also described in the Site Utility Study, located under Tab 3 of the Supporting Documents. (e) Materials to demonstrate the relationship of the elements listed in (4) preceding to surrounding area characteristics. The Drawings Submitted with this Application are located under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. r(f) Existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan designations for the area on and around the lands proposed for Major Use Special Permit. The zoning designation for the property pursuant to City of Miami Ordinance No -11000 indicates the existing and surrounding zoning. The zoning designations for the property are R-1 with an SD -18.1 and SD -3 overlay. The Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use designation for the property is Single Family. The zoning and the comprehensive plan designations are consistent with one another. 3. Section 1702.2.2 Major Use Special Permit Concept Plan. (a) Relationships of the concept plan to surrounding existing and proposed future uses, activities, systems, and facilities (transportation, recreation, view corridors, pedestrian systems, service systems and similar uses, Article II contains a written narrative of this project outlining the proposed use, activities and architectural character. This narrative also contains descriptions of the project's relationship to traffic, pedestrian movements, and transportation access. Building elevations, sections and perspectives showing the proposed materials, vertical profile and height, and orientation to streets are 80birilEt--d into the public 7 record �in� conri€;C it - with Ite Ifl eL._,�.' 3 oil F? F.1. 2`•� �. d k Waltor l°0oman City Clark C El ® included in the drawings submitted with this Application. The list of drawings submitted is found under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (b) Existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan principles and designations. This project conforms to the R-1, SD -18,1 and SD -3 zoning district designations. The Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use designation conforms to the proposed use. The PUD is consistent with the Miami Neighborhood Comprehensive Plan. The PUD will not in any manner reduce the capacity of the public facilities below acceptable levels of service. 4. Section 1702.2.3 Developmental Impact Study. (a) A traffic analysis shall be submitted for an area within approximately 114 mile of the site, or an area including the major intersections to be impacted by the site, whichever is larger. The Traffic Impact Analysis is included under Tab 2 of the Supporting Documents. OF (b) Economic impact data shall be provided, including estimates for construction costs, construction employment, and permanent employment and shall demonstrate that the proposed development is favorable to the economy, public services, environment and housing supply of the City. 8 The Economic Impact Study is included under Tab 4 of the Supporting Documents. (c) A housing impact assessment. The proposed project consists of four (4) single-family residences, which are in accordance with the -PUD requirements, of the City. Over the last several years there has been a resurgence to living near the work place. The proposed site is within fifteen minutes from Downtown Miami and within five minutes from the heart of Coconut Grove, thus a highly desirable location for working families. The type of upscale housing proposed for this project is designed to meet the surging need to be located near downtown Miami and to address the issue of urban decay with the construction of new homes. The project responds to this natural socio-economic challenge, with a careful awareness of the chargpter of the Grove, Public yL'�JiC;f ..i'o 6,10 Yocorcl in ;�onnccfion with (� A� item PL.,�'= on IL JY_'Cl ... , a1 Walter Foornan City Clerk such that the compact density of layering attached units with very ® little single family home identity is avoided. This project acknowledges that new, single family, luxury homes presented within the historical character of this area for the Grove, with a cobblestone drive, neighborhood environment would contribute to land value, increase and secure a tax revenue for a long term and add quality of residential space in response to the evident desires of the citizens of Miami to live in this community area. (d) A description of proposed energy conservation measures small be provided, including only those measures that are proposed in addition to the minimum requirements in State Energy Code. The residences will be designed in accordance with energy conservation measures in effect at the time of permitting. (e) Historic Buildings There are no historically designated structures located on the property. (f) Environmental Zone Only the Property fronting South Bayshore Drive is located within an Environmental Preservation District. The applicant will be preserving the natural existing bluff, as well as the home which was originally constructed in 1918. 10 (ho public wcord in �;onnoclioyl with 9 item A 3J on IL• L_-- a tr c�y _ r •v x9 i(�c7f[f?II! l Uf'Piian li�{! �llortt Into public i;oCit ooflon Vgith �._ 01.3 Ask qW THE ROYAL. BAY GROUP MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS ARTICLE III. Supporting Documents Tab 1 Minority Construction Employment Plan Tab 2 Traffic Impact Analysis Tab 3 Site Utility Study Tab 4 Economic Impact Study Tab 5 Survey of Property Tab 6 Architectural Pians jubm'1ttprl into the public record in o(innectlon with item --13— on—K711.-�-A— ,s d Waiter Fooniriti ` ,4 x _ City Cleric mcord in conlno:-.,iioq ydth itol-11 k. on -11-.M701 J n 0 THE ROYAL BAY GROUP MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT MINORITY CONSTRUCTION EMPLOYMENT PLAN Submii.ed into tho public rocord in connootion with Walter Foeman ' ` � `� 3 4 City Clelk MINORITY CONSTRUCTION EMPLOYMENT PLAN It is the policy of the Applicant to base its employee hiring and promotions, as well as its vendor and contractor hiring, on merit, qualifications and competency and that its personnel practices will not be influenced by an applicant's or employee's race, color, place of birth, religion, national origin, sex, sexual orientation, age, marital status, veteran and handicapped status. One of the management duties of the Applicant's principals is to ensure that the following personnel practices are being satisfied: 1. Take every necessary affirmative action to attract and retain qualified employees, regardless of race, color, place of birth, religion, national original, sex, sexual orientation, age, marital status, veteran and handicapped status. 2. Maintain equitable principles in the recruitment, hiring, training, compensation and promotion of employees. 3. Monitor and review personnel practices to guarantee that equal opportunities are being provided to ail employees, regardless of race, color, place of birth, religion, national origin, sex, sexual orientation, age, marital status, veteran and handicapped status. The Applicant is committed to take affirmative action and aggressively pursue activities that will serve to enable all employees, vendors and contractors opportunities for employment. Specifically, the Applicant shall utilize the following to achieve the above -referenced Policy: 1. RECRUITMENTIADVERTISING All contractor and/or employment advertising will include a statement of Equal Employment Opportunity. 2. HIRING PROCEDURES All positions will be filled without regard to race, color, religion, sex or national origin. The Applicant is dedicated to a policy of equal employment opportunities for minorities. 3. PROMOTION PROCEDURES Tho Applicant maintains equitable principles in the promotion of employees, The Miami -Dade County community can only improve if the lifestyles of every single hito the pubIlei rocord in coi7nec' on with on _%./ �4t Walter Fooman 4_� .: � �. � 3 �. City Clerk J disadvantaged group in the community is advanced. We will continually monitor and review personnel and contractor employment practices to guarantee that equal opportunities are being provided to all employees, vendors or contractors regardless of race, color, place of birth, religion, nationai origin, sex, sexual orientation, age, marital status, veteran and handicapped status. 4. UTILIZATION OF LOCAL. MINORITY BUSINESSES The Applicant will endeavor to utilize Black Minority and Women -owned firms. Furthermore, it will require all of its contractors to also solicit and utilize to the fullest extent possible minority and women -owned subcontractors and vendors. `?rrbrni,tec! into tiro rrtII711 record in with 2 item _ - Walter Fooman 0 city ;look Dppemtaer,T, 2QOO :..fabarg-'raurig, R.A. 1.221',$dokelt AVelnuc Evliaml!� fibtida� ��Z�1 • .. • 'major Vw Spatial Permit fQr propgrty.ic00tad PJPProx m@tOIy ' at 1841 , Sayshpt� 0&0 and 1646%.-Mibe'rnopy This l ttAc rVP,B to �dvi yat that G�t�ni� irtjr `�raorig MS. it �ut}�+d�;•to'�il�'�.' ' ' 'Maui 0$0 Speoiai Permit GpolcAilon fora S, trnk'rtsk ential planned unit.d6Velgph) h1 bo.lpoated -a4 I(Ml S', Uay8hofa beive and 1640 iyl10411.apy,•Miarrtl, Flarids, ftlet`the ap�lir�tiorl will tae fiiod on beh� flf of rnV46if-a5 the owner ajn4 Tlro. fkcyai Bay, Gm0,,,LL.C„ the prop,oaed•pymhgrar of.the prop�t#y, lt. 1$ roy undarstanding• that "Che Royal ,fty Group,' f.,L, ,,, wilt bo payIng ,%r,4ti-, pplloat`xatl fegn, ,as well as for ali•iegal TeoGam d 5y'P'reenorp Tc" uilg Arid that's Will: no.1'b, roaponslble, fog uny eostd or fOO tp GMenbesq TrAvtiA. �!.q�' vuly Ys ! erug Oavlglus, .•• . _ '�3�,k�sr�ifP�jc, 'ik'�iCl f��c fiul�iiC • , �' ' record in 00111'1011¢ion with Walter Foe man city clock 4 ® 0 0 ROYAL BAY ESTATES 1641 SOUTH BAYSHORE DRIVE AND 1640 MICANOPY AVENUE TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Prepared for THE ROYAL SAY GROUP, INC. 2601 South Bayshore Drive Suite 1000 Miami, Florida 33133 (305) $592050 TO ,Jackson M. Ahlstedt, P.E. 46 N.W. 94th Street Miami Shores, Florida 33150 (305) 754.8695 January 2001 Ll Submitted into the public record in connection with itom _ on J 1 -Ot Walter Foernan City Cleric Jackson M. Ahlstedt, P.E. Florida Registration #28258 U .j. 1 23 4- 0 IA13LE QF CQNTENU 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................... 1 2.0 PURPOSE OF STUDY ........................................... 1 3,0 STUDY AREA .................................................. 2 4.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS ......................................... 5 4.1 EXISTING ROADWAY CONDITIONS .......................... 5 4.2 EXISTING SIGNAL. TIMING .................................. 7 4.3 EXISTING TRAFFIC COUNTS ......................... . .. . .. 7 4.4 MASS TRANSIT .......................................... 11 4.5 EXISTING LEVET_ OF SERVICE ............................. 11 5.0 TRIP GENERATION ............................................ 14 6.0 TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT ...................16 7.0 PROGRAMMED AND PLANNED ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS .......... 19 8.0 FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS ................................. 19 9.0 FUTURE TRAFFIC AND PROJECT TRAFFIC CONDITIONS ............ 24 10.0 ON -STREET PARKING.........................................29 11.0 PEDESTRIANS...............................................29 12.0 PROJECT SITE PLAN ................. . ........................ 29 12.1 PROJECT DRIVEWAYS .................................. 1 29 12.2 SERVICE AND DELIVERY VEHICLES ........................ 30 12.3 PEDESTRIAN ACCESS .................................... 30 13.0 CONCLUSIONS ............................................... 31 Idamh Submitt:;d into tho public record in corinp0ion with Itern on-, Walter Foeman City Clerk 9�� -Submittod into tho public rocord in conn-clion with itom on JE-. Wzltor Foornan City Clor1< LIST OE TABLES TABLE 1 PROJECT DATA ............................................... 1 TABLE 2 1999 AVERAGE ANNUAL DAILY TRAFFIC (AADT) VOLUMES IN VEHICLES PER DAY (VPD) ........................... 7 TABLE 3 EXISTING PM PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT DATA ........ 8 TABLE 4 2000 AVERAGE ANNUAL DAILY TRAFFIC (AADT) VOLUMES IN VEHICLES PER DAY (VPD) ........................... 9 TABLE 5 EXISTING INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR CONDITIONS .......................... 11 TABLE 6 EXISTING LINK LEVEL OF SERVICE ........ . ..................... 13 TABLE 9 FINAL EXTERNAL PROJECT TRAFFIC ............................ 15 TABLE 10 PEAK HOUR DISTRIBUTION OF NEW PROJECT TRIPS ............... 17 TABLE 11 PROGRAMMED AND PLANNED IMPROVEMENTS ................... 19 TABLE 12 FUTURE PM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES ................ 20 TABLE 13 FUTURE INTERSECTION LOS W/O PROJECT WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR CONDITIONS ......................... . 21 TABLE 14 FUTURE LINK LEVEL OF SERVICE WITHOUT PROJECT .............. 23 TABLE 15 FUTURE PM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES ................ 25 TABLE 16 FUTURE INTERSECTION LOS WITH PROJECT WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR CONDITIONS .......................... 26 TABLE 17 FUTURE LINK LEVEL OF SERVICE WITH PROJECT ................. 25 TABLE 19 AM AND PM PEAK HOUR DRIVEWAY VOLUMES .................... 29 TABLE 19 INTERSECTION LEVEL. OF SERVICE SUMMARY WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR CONDITIONS .......................... 31 -Submittod into tho public rocord in conn-clion with itom on JE-. Wzltor Foornan City Clor1< 0 LIST..QF ,F_GURU FIGURE 1 PROJECT LOCATION .............. . .................. I ......... 2 FIGURE 2 STUDYAREA .................................................. 4 FIGURE 3 INTERSECTION CONFIGURATIONS ............................... 6 FIGURE 4 EXISTING TRAFFIC ....................................... 9 FIGURE 6 EXISTING LEVELS OF SERVICE ................................. 11 FIGURE 6 PROJECT TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT ................................ 17 FIGURE 7 FUTURE LEVELS OF SERVICE W/O PROJECT ...................... 22 FIGURE 8 FUTURE LEVELS OF SERVICE WITH PROJECT ..................... 27 aubmitfcAci fW0 thO Pub1FG rocorc1 in c���rncrfion with item , on i1.1 M ltor Foom Cir 0 1.0 INTRODUCTION Royal Bay Estates is a single phase development consisting of six single family homes. The site is located at 1841 South Bayshore Drive and 1640 Micanopy Avenue, between SW 17th Avenue and Hailssee Street, as shown in Figure 1. The proposed development consists of the following components: TABLE 1 PROJECT DATA ���y y' .`F ., RESIDENTIAL Single Family (Detached Homes DU The existing site contains two single family homes. The project results in a net increase of four single family detached Domes in the area. As planned, vehicular access to the site is proposed to be via a through driveway connecting to South Bayshore Drive on the south and Micanopy Avenue on the north. The proposed development consists of one phase. For purposes of this traffic impact analysis, ultimate build -out has been estimated to occur by the year 2002. 2.0 PURPOSE OF STUDY The primary purpose of this study is to assess the impacts of vehicular traffic on signalized intersections and roadways within the study area due to the proposed development by conducting a roadway link and signalized intersection level of service analysis. In addition, the report provides a general assessment of project impacts on parking and pedestrians. Specific items discussed are as follows: Existing traffic volumes and levels of service for major roadways within the study area; Number of trips generated by the proposed project and the distribution of these trips within the study area network. Future background and project traffic conditions and levels of service; Determination of whether the impacts of the proposed project exceed the City of Miami concurrency standards, and solutions to mitigate. adverse impacts, if any; See JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P,E. 0- :'IFF(l l!"T) 81F public ROYAL BAY ESTATES record in connootion with January 25, 2001 Page 1 item PZ'�- on ��V T"_d i Waiter Foaman City Clork 0 Appendix H for a concurrency analysis.. J 0 Determination of project impacts on on -street parking; and, Determination of project impacts on pedestrians. 3.0 STUDY AREA The study area's boundaries were defined to Include: 32nd Road as the northern boundary, SW 22nd Avenue as the southern boundary, Biscayne Bay as the eastern boundary, and US 1 (South Dixie Highway) as the western boundary. Figure 2 shows the signalized intersection and roadway links which are most significant to the project. These include the following intersections: SW 17th Avenge and South Bayshore Drive The roadway links include the following: South Bayshore Drive from SW 22nd Avenue to SW 32nd Road i:" I im-) floe, public rocord in conno,;,C oil with item p3 on Wtjgc,'r city clortc .JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, F.E. ROYAL DAY ESTATES January 25, 2009 Page 2 C El A11004AL T . "1 FLAG 1W NTS MIAMI BEACH FISHER W.A140 KEY 915CAY019 suj)mittc:d into the public rocord in c0rin0 ,,&)n with item �• on W x-577-61coorman — FIGURE 1 PROJECT LOCATION JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. ROYAL BAY ESTATES January 25, 2009 Page 3 k) r11 � tt El d i Q (i] 5 y.. � m z �N W Uj0 5W 17TH AVENUE 5W 22ND AVENUE Submittod into the; puhiid monrrl in [:01.10 -Moon With rzf/±j IOU 11 iter �Z'_3._u orr 4� • -- STEADY AREA tva1.c,�r vmoo nan JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. lROYAL DAY ESTATES January 25, 2009 Page 4 1 Yz 3 0 4.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS The study area was surveyed to observe existing traffic conditions, identify parking locations, identify traffic counts locations, and to collect traffic count data. 4.1 EXISTING ROADWAY CONDITIONS Key roadways in the study area include South Bayshore Drive and SW 17th Avenue. South Bayshore Drive is a county maintained roadway with turn lanes at major intersections. Signalized intersections are located at: US -1 • South 32nd Road 3601 Block • Mercy Hospital Way • SW 17th Avenue • l=air Isle Street Aviation Avenue Between US 1 and Mercy Hospital Way, South Bayshore Drive is a four -lane roadway. Between SW 17th Avenue and Halissee Street, South Bayshore Drive is one lane northbound and two -lanes southbound. Approximately 70 feet north of Halissee Street, South Bayshore Drive becomes two lanes northbound and two lanes southbound. Southbound left turn storage lanes are provided at the intersections with Mercy Hospital Way and the 3601 Block. South of SW 17th Avenue, South Bayshore Drive is a two lane roadway from SW 17th Avenue to Aviation Avenue. At the intersection of South Bayshore Drive and SW 17th Avenue there is a northbound left turn lane and a southbound right turn lane drop. The lane configurations for each of the intersections to be analyzed are shown in Figure 3. Subrnit ,'-,d i; -,to 'Ll -v PlAblic rGCdrd i"fI ��1i it %'I1:o' "B� item 0.0 JLMAawkl�_v W Ii r Foornan 49 city Clea#( JACKSON M. AMLSTEDT, P.B. ROYAL BAY ESTATES January 25, 2001 A Page 6 El 1-1 FIGURE 3 subni" -1.p(liftTERSECTION CONFIGURATIONS rocord r1i JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. Itorn ROYAL BAY ESTATES January 25,2001 !ter Fooman Page 6 City Cled< F1 4.2 EXISTING SIGNAL TINTING Existing signal timing data for the signalized intersections to be analyzed was obtained from the Miami -Dade County Traffic Control Center. This data was used in the intersection capacity analysis to determine each intersection's level of service (LAS), 4.3 EXISTING TRAFFIC COUNTS There is one existing Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) traffic count location within the study area. Data for this traffic count location is summarized in Fable 2. TABLE 2 1999 AVERAGE ANNUAL~ DAILY TRAFFIC (AADT) VOLUMES IN VEHICLES PER DAY (VPD) O �f �:, i, o{ 2\ }+ �� �� f� �a' ff\ � 1';h i � {ft� 17]I;.. �� �.E Vi -.- _ i.� •./�1��� 5036 SR 6/US-1 20T NORTH OF SW 17TH NB 50,500 SB 48,000 98,500 AVENUE" Source; Fiorida Department of Transportation, District 6, Additional traffic count data was collected. Turning movement counts were obtained at the intersections of SW 17th Avenue and South Bayshore Drive on Wednesday, [december 20, 2000 between 4:30 - 6:39 PM, 24 -Dour machine traffic counts were obtained on the following roadways on December 20, 2000; South Bayshore Drive east of SW 17th Avenue South Bayshore Drive west of SW 17th Avenue SW 17th Avenue north of South Bayshore Drive This traffic count data is summarized in Tables 3 and 4 and depicted on Figure 4. rocord i0 oil It! ► 4ly V%/ ijfo; ; oornan Gi-ty C;1of11, JACKSON M. AHL.STBDT, P.B. ROYAL BAY ESTATES January25, 2001 Page 7 E TABLE 4 2000 AVERAGE ANNUAL DAILY TRAFFIC (AADT) VOLUMES IN VEHICLES PER DAY (VPD) LC3CAiliN SOUTH BAYSHORE DRIVE EAST OF SW 17TH EB 14,800 03 16,530 31,330 AVENUE SOUTH BAYSHORE DRIVE WEST OF SW 17TH EB 13,500 WI3 14,240 27,740 AVENUE SW 17TH AVENUE NORTH OF S. BAYSHORE NB 6.090 S8 3,080 9,170 DRIVE AADT FACTOR 11.01l Source, Original Machine Traffic Counts Taken December 20, 2000. 6 '�'ubrnittod Into tiro public rocord in GNinectloj with W11f0l'Foernan cay clod( JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. ROYAL BAY ESTATES January 25, 2001 Page 9 34 11 0 3601 BLOCK NTS ALATKA Ilk, y HALISSEE G� LU m PROJFCT oV o w 0 W W.694 gg4 � 6,153 l � m 14,846 C� VOLUMES IN VEHICLES PER DAY(VPD)14383 ,ti3,632 FIGURE 4 is ubmItted Into tho public EXISTING TRAFFIC \7tord I �� -5 I_1t'�i'� JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. (0-Cll ��W -G-L u+� ct l an with r,' Bl _ ROYAL BAY ESTATE9 01 ijlfc ltor roeman January 25, o i Pagq City CI k 01 -- 1 4.4 MASS TRANSIT The study area is served by a limited mass transit network. Route 48, which operates on 60 minute headways on South Bayshore, Chive, is the only Metrobus route which serves the project. The closest Metrorail station is the Viscaya Station located at SW 32nd Road and US 1. 4.5 EXISTING LEVEL OF SERVICE Each of the intersections were analyzed to determine the level of service. The Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) 1997 methodology based Highway Capacity Software, HCS Version 3.1 was used. The results are shown in Table 5 and on Figure 5. The intersection level of service analyses are included in Appendix A, TABLE 5 EXISTING INTERSECTION LEVEL. OF SERVICE WEEKDAY LSM PEAK FLOUR CONDITIONS d INTELCIStTi14" l(..OS fy S. Ba shore Drive and SW 17th Avenue F ziubinittod k1to tho public record in connoction with ltorn PZ -3 on Walter Fooman City Clerk JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. ROYAL. CLAY ESTATES January 25, 2001 Page 11 C 0 3601 BLOCK NTS ALATKA y � . MAL19SEE w z � ¢ � < PROJECT M 0 0 m -E)-SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION LU 0 z F m INTERSECTION LOS F F [F] LINK LOS F FIGURE 6 p[,,lAKjSTING LEVELS OF SERVICE JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. go0c`� on^YI�! .� ROYAL 13AY ESTATES January 25, 2001 Walter 1=0['91 an Page 12 city Clark y � .,_ 1 2 11 Link analysis was also performed on three roadways within the study area using the MOT 1998 Level of Service Handbook, Tables 5-1 and 5-4. Those roadways are South Sayshore Drive north of SW 17th Avenue, South Sayshore Drive south of SW 17th Avenue and SW 17th Avenue, . The results of these analyses are summarized in Table 6, The FDOT LOS link analyses are included in Appendix 13, TABLE 6 EXISTING LINK LEVEL OF SERVICE Submittod into the public r0c0i'd ft) collflcic,Jon with GUY Glow, JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. ROYAL SAY ESTATES January 25, 2001 Page 13 S. Sayshore Drive Aviation Avenue SW 17th Avenue F S. Sayshore Drive SW 17th Avenue Mercy Hospital Way F SW 17th Avenue S. Sayshore Drive US 1 S. Dixie Hlghwa� Submittod into the public r0c0i'd ft) collflcic,Jon with GUY Glow, JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. ROYAL SAY ESTATES January 25, 2001 Page 13 5.0 TRIP GENERATION The total number of vehicular trips generated by the land use, single family residential, was determined for the PM peak hour using the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Trip Generation, 6th Edition. The number of vehicular trips generated by the project was based on the total number of dwelling units, using data for ITE land Use Code 210. Soubmittod in!") Me public record it's item JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. ROYAL. BAY ESTATES January 25, 2001 Page 14 i_f .«e`: Er 0 TABLE 9 FINAL EXTERNAL PROJECT TRAFFIC As can be seen from Table 9, the estimated number of new vehicle trips entering the project during the PM peak hour is 3. The estimated number of new vehicle trips leaving the project during the PM peak hour is 2. cF�ubrfilt''-c r 11'3Fo V'1- public rocord IrF ..`i)I�;'li�'�iiC7i� !n.�{til Afflakk iters ft -A.- On R JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. ROYAL BAY ESTATES January 25, 2001 Page 15 WEEKDAY IN 14 39 25 VPD OUT 14 39 25 VPD TOTAL 28 78 50 VPD AM PEAK HOUR OF ADJACENT STREET IN 3 3 1 VPH OUT 8 10 2 VPH TOTAL 11 14 3 VPH PM PEAK HOUR OF ADJACENT STREET IN 2 5 3 VPH OUT 1 3 2 VPH TOTAL 3 9 5 VPH As can be seen from Table 9, the estimated number of new vehicle trips entering the project during the PM peak hour is 3. The estimated number of new vehicle trips leaving the project during the PM peak hour is 2. cF�ubrfilt''-c r 11'3Fo V'1- public rocord IrF ..`i)I�;'li�'�iiC7i� !n.�{til Afflakk iters ft -A.- On R JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. ROYAL BAY ESTATES January 25, 2001 Page 15 L El 6.0 TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT The project is located in Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) 686. The cardinal distribution of the traffic within TAZ 686 was obtained from Miami -Dade County. The distribution is as follows: The distribution of AM and PM project trips is summarized in Table 10. Based upon this trip distribution, the project trips were assigned to the roadway network. This is shown in Figure e. JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. Subnn!'!')d iql -o Oln Public rocord in volrin(!�oli win, itern R4, - on V "' ;i«f ROYAL SAY ESTATES January25, 2001 Page 16 North -North-East 29.07% East -North-East 11.62% East -South -East 0.22% South -South -East 2.36% South -South-West 3.59% West -South-West 21.38% West -North-West 14.34% North -North-West 17,42% The distribution of AM and PM project trips is summarized in Table 10. Based upon this trip distribution, the project trips were assigned to the roadway network. This is shown in Figure e. JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. Subnn!'!')d iql -o Oln Public rocord in volrin(!�oli win, itern R4, - on V "' ;i«f ROYAL SAY ESTATES January25, 2001 Page 16 G El 0 TABLE 10 PEAK HOUR DISTRIBUTION OF NEW PROJECT TRIPS L"ubmitted into tho public 0 Walt,, Foernan City clork JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. ROYAL 13AY ESTATES January 25, 2001 Page 17 c) s 4 _1 2 e `'. i A!'� �.�� 5 ��i11 S-- % '; it S (.- k i S 5� k�l '�- f��` 5 J�1.✓�{}L.f �li5i� 2 t NORTH NNW 17.42% 0 0 0 1 1 0 NNE 29.07% 1 0 1 2 1 1 EAST ENE 11,52% 0 0 0 1 0 0 ESE 0.22°/a 0 0 0 0 0 0 SOUTH SSE 2.36% 0 0 0 0 0 0 SSW 3.59% 0 0 0 0 0 0 WEST WSW 21,38% 1 0 0 1 1 0 WNW 14.34% 0 0 0 1 0 0 TOTAL 100.00% =L==3===j 1 2 5 3 2 L"ubmitted into tho public 0 Walt,, Foernan City clork JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. ROYAL 13AY ESTATES January 25, 2001 Page 17 c) s 4 _1 2 e `'. 0 3601 BLOCK NTS ALATKA 9y�y HALISSEE v �� PROJECT ,�LU U_ r p SIGNALISED INTERSECTION X < m .j I NO SB 17TH AVENUE LEFT TURN R 0 s ® 7 AM TO 9;30 AM w 0 NEW PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES IN VPH AM PEAK WR (PM PEAK HR) oto) Q(1) FIGURE 6 PROJECT TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT JACKSON M. AHL.S7EDT, P.E.1OCOrt'r '. oi�rloc;fiCn with January BAY ESTATES p�'�_ t:}rY .�/~-/� D! Janeary 25, 201 Item dy .. Page 16 WaItor i--oo,man Ey �, City cler#c ,� b1 i s 0 0 0 7.0 PROGRAMMED AND PLANNED ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS Using the Metro -Dade Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), 2001, the programmed and planned improvements in the study area were determined. These improvements are detailed in Table 11. TABLE 11 PROGRAMMED AND PLANNED IMPROVEMENTS �� I"COA� t y ��t � rfl � 1 3 �� � ��� ' r�i�I'Al! � � i g �.v^.��i �r���-�R�� ; y r4 3 � i � l✓�" i- r r l S. Bayshore Alatka Avenue Aviation Signalization Completed Drive Avenue 0.0 FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS Analysis of historical traffic count data on South Bayshore Drive indicates that in the last six to eight years traffic has grown at a rate of approximately 4% per year. Additionally, a review of approved Mixed Use Special Permit (MUSP) projects in the City of Miami identified one project which might significantly impact the section of South Bayshore Drive in the vicinity of the project. Assuming that the proposed project can be completed by the year 2002; it is anticipated that existing traffic on South Bayshore Drive could increase by approximately 6% to 8% by the time the project is completed. Table 12 details the future background plus committed development traffic volumes. These volumes were then used to determine intersection and link level of service by using the same software programs and LOS tables as used for previous analysis. The intersection level of service for the future background traffic volumes are shown in Table 13 and on Figure 7. The intersection's level of service remained F. This values is the same as for the year 2000. The intersection level of service analyses are included in Appendix C. The linin level of service analysis for future traffic conditions was performed on the roadway links identified previously. These results are summarized in Table 14. The link level of service analyses for future traffic conditions are included in Appendix D. subrnia('u'G iis'o 1'ho, )uWic r©cord in connedion with item PZ --.-Son Ja.° s pe! Wa[teK Foornan City Clod( JACKSON M. ANL.STEDT, P,r=. ROYAL BAY ESTATES January25, 2001 Page 19 A �- !1 'Ul TABLE 12 FUTURE PM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES WITHOUT PROJECT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . SW 17th Avenue 144 749 NA NA 1,335 650 123 NA and S. Bayshore Drive NOTES: NA - Movement Not Available E 125 NA NA NA I-] 2 E TABLE 13 FUTURE INTERSECTION LOS W/O PROJECT WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR CONDITIONS Submiticcl 1,rito i110 int 8>li�i rocord it-, G()�-w item Pk- —3 oil It - JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. ROYAL EM ESTATEr, January 25, 2001 Page 21 S. Ba shore Drive and SW 17th Avenue F Submiticcl 1,rito i110 int 8>li�i rocord it-, G()�-w item Pk- —3 oil It - JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. ROYAL EM ESTATEr, January 25, 2001 Page 21 E-1 FIGURE i FUTURE LEVELS OF SERVICE W/O PROJECT JACKSON M. AHLSTEOT, P.E. 'n(o M6 pub -110 ROYAL SAY ESTATES record 41 corlvicd- r�d{.� i€ n with January 25, 2009 on W- _ Page 22 � WalYor Fooman , Ckj CkW( E 0 0 TABLE 14 FUTURE LINK LEVEL OF SERVICE WITHOUT PROJECT m 11 A .2 S. Bayshore Drive Aviation Avenue SW 17th Avenue F S. Hayshore Drive SW 17th Avenue Mercy Hospital Way F SW 17th Avenue S. 8a shore Drive US 1 S. Dixie Highway) F 'L!M rnlvmd Imo vio powic, ,Oco. o 1 KNA -on o0l 1 lfi� i Gly Gfw;�, JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. ROYAL ®AY F -STATES January 26, 2001 Page 23 0 1 0 9 9.0 FUTURE TRAFFIC AND PROJECT TRAFFIC CONDITIONS Future traffic and project traffic conditions were analyzed for year 2002. This was accomplished by using the 2002 estimated traffic volumes and adding the traffic generated by the project (as shown in Table 10). Table 15 details the future background plus project volumes for the PM peak hour. These volumes were then used to determine the intersection and fink levels of service using the same procedure as previously stated. For the most part, there were only minor changes between the year 2002 future intersection level of service and the year 2002 future background plus project volumes. This is shown in Table 16 and on Figure 8. The intersection level of service analyses are included in Appendix E. The link level of service analysis for future traffic and project traffic conditions was performed on the previously identified roadway links. These results are summarized in Table 17. The link level of service analyses for future traffic and project traffic conditions are included in Appendix F. ;i:c) 'k'ho public rocord in "Pith itorn _�' ... on l_._ Wnitor F=oonlan City Clerk .JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. ROYAL BAY ESTATES January 25, 2049 Page 24 XJ .7 n x Q 0 0 9 C� m TABLE 15 FUTURE PM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES VOTH PROJECT NOTES: NA - Movement Not Available GD o C 75 L C � is 1��"!\��4�1V1■ f k++��- `.. ( -?' ', �,. 'moi'. � 3 -,A T _ -% i �j SW IM Avenue 144 750 NA NA 1,336 65p 123 NA 925 NA NA NA and S. Bayshore Drive NOTES: NA - Movement Not Available GD o C 75 L C � is E 0 TABLE 16 FUTURE INTERSECTION LOS WITH PROJECT WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR CONDITIONS o 8 ubmittod Into fhp public rocord in tpoilh or, V. 4.A-1— .'-c)(,m -mn %lal'or I Cif y clorl JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. ROYAL BAY ESTATES January 25, 2001 Page 26 S. Ea shore Drive and SW 17th Avenue ........F F F o 8 ubmittod Into fhp public rocord in tpoilh or, V. 4.A-1— .'-c)(,m -mn %lal'or I Cif y clorl JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. ROYAL BAY ESTATES January 25, 2001 Page 26 FIGURE 8 FUTURE LEVELS OF SERVICE WITH PROJECT JACKSON M. AWLSTEDT, P.E. a ROYAL BAY ESTATES rocol,d I�'t1_'�)n3),!Gtjon with January 25,2o01 Ito3 r� z-3 on 15 --OL- Page 27 WaRcr [ioonitar► city Gln(k 0 0 TABLE 17 FUTURE LINK LEVEL OF SERVICE WITH PROJECT El 11 oubmittod into thopublic record in comr don with itom ,� ' ort Walter r il:uornan Gity clork JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, R.E. ROYAL BAY ESTATES January 25, 2001 Page 28 � I 1 SIi+J S. Bayshore Drive Aviation Avenue SW 17th Avenue F S. Bayshore Drive SW 17th Avenue Mercy Hospital Way F SW 17th Avenue S. Bayshore Drive US 1 S. nixie Hi hwa F oubmittod into thopublic record in comr don with itom ,� ' ort Walter r il:uornan Gity clork JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, R.E. ROYAL BAY ESTATES January 25, 2001 Page 28 El EI 10.0 ON -STREET PARKING There is no on -street parking within close proximity of the project, The project will construct individual two -car garages for each dwelling unit plus each driveway can accommodate two additional parked cars, The project will have no impact on on -street parking. 11.0 PEDESTRIANS There is little pedestrian activity in the immediate vicinity of the site. Most activity relates to joggers and bicyclists. The project wold have negligible impacts on pedestrians. 12,0 PROJECT SITE PLAN Traffic and transportation aspects of the proposed site plan were reviewed and analyzed, 12.1 PROJECT DRIVEWAYS The project is proposed to be served by a two-way two-lane private street connecting South Bayshore Drive and Micanopy Avenue. Table 18 summarizes the AM and PM peak hour volumes anticipated at the connections to the public streets. TABLE 18 AM AND PM PEAK HOUR DRIVEWAY VOLUMES IN VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH) .JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E.q ` ` ' � ROYAL BAY ESTATES record 10i'11cc.tif')n With January 26, 2001 Item /��'� on.��-_.�_� _�.� Page 29 Vvalte;r F-001,111NI city Clerk 14N�N�f, 'i,UTILfif NN�OI�N�`UTO�N { f .F j': SOUTH BAYSHORE 2 6 3 2 DRIVE MICANOPY AVENUE 1 4 2 1 TOTAL 3 10 5 3 .JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E.q ` ` ' � ROYAL BAY ESTATES record 10i'11cc.tif')n With January 26, 2001 Item /��'� on.��-_.�_� _�.� Page 29 Vvalte;r F-001,111NI city Clerk C Analysis of potential inbound queues indicates that during the PM peak hour that there is approximately a 99% probability that each queue should not exceed 1 vehicle. Thus, the inbound queue space appears adequate to preclude disruption to traffic flow on South Bayshore Drive and Micanopy Avenue. Analysis of potential outbound queues for the AM peak hour that there is approximately a 99% probability that the queue should not exceed 1 vehicle. it is anticipated that this will not result in any significant queuing within the project. This would not have any impact on traffic operations on South Bayshore Drive or Micanopy Avenue, 12.2 SERVICE AND DELIVERY VEHICLES The proposed site plan requires service and delivery vehicles to park in the private street. All service vehicles will be accommodated on site. 12,3 PEDESTRIAN ACCESS The proposed site plan provides pedestrian gates adjacent to the proposed vehicular gates at each end of the private street. SubMWod Into tho pubff(o record if) c00�01,' ion with Walter i'001man JACKSON M. AWL_STEDY, P.G. ROYAL. GAYa -" January 25, 2001 30 C 11 E 13,0 CONCLUSIONS After reviewing the results from the intersection analysis and the roadway link analysis, in has been determined that the project will have a negligible impact on the roadways and intersections in the area. The potential increase in traffic due to four additional residential dwelling units in the area will be imperceptible to normal traffic count data acquisition processes and well within the normal variation in daily and hourly traffic volumes. Analysis of the intersection of South Sayshore Drive and SW 17th Avenue indicates that the additional traffic generated by the project can be accommodated with the following modifications: in the AM peak hour - minor retiming of the traffic signal in the PM peak hour - added cycle length with the additional green time added to the southbound S. Sayshore Drive movement While these modifications will not improve the already existing level of service they will mitigate the relatively insignificant impacts of the project and will result in overall delays similar to the existing conditions. TABLE 19 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE SUMMARY WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR CONDITIONS z. )Ub'Y11tWd I€'fro p(Abl'io r©cord in (:f)f'il" ;;iJfl tvlth On Walter i'Tcoman city clr rk .JACKSON M. AHLOTEDT, P.E. ROYAL BAY MrATEs January 25, 2001 Page 31 - 2 4`JI ; �i .L_OL fr\t1j- �� 1l�fR©�f�C,�i`,� s��f>rpl�ttlCX �fl1l�'l�l�J(37 � z i �✓ -a � i�.ks= r ikGG` �- ° �+ '. � � , tel 3 _r +c � { '- { ��s �... c `� S. Bayshere Drive E p F and SW 17th Avenue �. z. )Ub'Y11tWd I€'fro p(Abl'io r©cord in (:f)f'il" ;;iJfl tvlth On Walter i'Tcoman city clr rk .JACKSON M. AHLOTEDT, P.E. ROYAL BAY MrATEs January 25, 2001 Page 31 - 2 4`JI ; �i .L_OL APPENDIX A Existing Intersection Level of Service Submlt;o�a Into tho public record in ronr o-flon with Itcm P?ar on _._I►'1�� Vapor (�Oc man City Cloth 11 Jackson M. Ahlstedt Jackson M. Ahlstedt, P.E. Jackson M. Ahlstedt, P.E. 46 N.W. 94th Street Miami Shares, Florida 33150 Phone: (305) 754-8695 E -Mail: 0 HCS: Signals Release 3.1 Fax: (305) 754-8695 OPERATIONAL, ANALYSIS Intersection: S BAYSHORE/SW 17TH AVE 0 1 0 0 1 City/State: Duration MIAMI/PLA Area Type: All other areas Analyst: J. AHLSTEDT OPERATING PARAMETERS Project No: ROYAL. BAY ESTATES I Eastbound [ Westbound [ Northbound 1 Southbound 1 Time Period Analyzed: EXISTING PM PEAK 1 L T R 1 L T R I L T R 1 Date: 10.0 1/25/01 0.0 0.0 1� [ 0.0 1 East/West Street Name: S 8AYSHORC 3 I 3 3 I North/South Street Name: SW 17TH AVE 3.0 [ 3.0 3.0 1 [ 3.0 1 I Factor VOLUME DATA 1.000 [ 1.000 1 1 1.000 1 Last Time 12.0 2.0 I 2.0 2.0 [ [ Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound 1 Southbound I 2.0 L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R 1 Volume 1133 677 1 1216 661-1 1114 0 116 1 PHF 10.59 0.84 1 0.94 0.93 1 10.73 0.94 0.57 i PK 15 Vol 156 201 1 323 162 1 139 0 51 1 H1 Ln Vol I I I I Left ouhmitted into the public % Grade 1 0 1 0 1 I 0 # Ideal Sat 11900 1900 1 1900 1900 1 1 1900 1 ParkExist I NumPark I % Heavy Vehlo 0 No. Lanes I 1 1 0 LGConeig I L T Lane Width 112.0 12.0 RTOR Vol I Adj Flow 1225 806 %InSharedLnl Prot, Turns I NumPeds I 1 I ! I I 1 0 0 1 10 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 T R 1 1 LTR 1 12.0 12.0 1 1 12,0 1 0 I I a I 1294 646 1 1 360 1 i I I l 10.43 0.57 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 NumBus 10 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 Duration 1.00 Area Type: All other areas OPERATING PARAMETERS I Eastbound [ Westbound [ Northbound 1 Southbound 1 I L T R 1 L T R 1 L T R I L T R 1 Init Unmet 10.0 0.0 0.0 1� [ 0.0 1 0.0 Arriv. Type13 3 I 3 3 I I 3 1 Unit Ext. 13.0 3.0 [ 3.0 3.0 1 [ 3.0 1 I Factor 1 1.000 [ 1.000 1 1 1.000 1 Last Time 12.0 2.0 I 2.0 2.0 [ 1 2.0 [ Ext of g 12.0 2.0 1 2.0 2.0 1 1 2.0 I Ped Ming 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 1 0.0 1 PHASE DATA....... Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 a EB Leet A P 1 NB Left ouhmitted into the public Thru A P 1 Thru record k) CO;;f1nc,'.Jon with Right Right �' on Peds I Ped ItO4-1 � •��". B17EP,doc Wi lter f -oar an a WB Left ® I SD Left A Thru P I Thru A Right P I Right A Pods I Ped N8 bight j EB Right SB Right i W8 Right A I I Green 5.0 96.0 12.0 Yellow 3.0 4.0 4.0 All Red 0.0 1.0 0.0 Cycle Length: 125.0 Seca VOLUME ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET Adjusted Prop. Prop. Appr./ Mvt Flow No. Lane Flaw Rate Left Right Movement Volume PHF Rate Lanes Group RTOR In Lane Grp Turns Turns Eastbound Left 133 0.59 225 1 L 225 Thru 677 0.84 606 1 T 806 Right 0 Westbound Left 0 Thru 1216 0,94 1294 1 T 1294 Right 601 0,93 646 1 R 0 646 Northbound Left 0 Thru 0 Right b Southbound Left 114 0.73 156 0 Thru 0 0.94 0 1 LTR 360 0.43 0.57 Right 116 0.57 204 0 0 Value entered by user. SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET_ Appri Ideal Adj Lane Sat f £ f f £ f f E f Sat - -- - Group Flow _ W_...- HV .-. 0 P ._BB - A -- LU -RT LT _..__Flow Eastbound Seo LT Adj/LT Sat: 0.059 112 L 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 1.00 ---- 0.950 1805 T 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.000 1.000 1900 Westbound Sec LT Adj/LT Sat: T 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.000 1.000 1900 R 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 1.00 0.850 ---- 1515 Northbound Sec LT Adj/LT Sat: Southbound LTR 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1,000 B 17EP,doe Sea LT Adj/LT Sat: 1.000 1.00 1.00 0.623 0.979 1531 ubr�ittod into tt�c���bfiY� 2 rocord in connection wlth Item PE -3 . On Walter 1'oorvian < i City Cloriz Westbound T 0,89 0,768 10.6 1.000 1459 0.50 9.3 0.0 19.8 B 19.8 B R 0.44 0.904 1.0 1.000 1460 0.11 0.2 0.0 1.2 A Northbound rocord in c;onnoc i on with Southb❑und i$om 0-b on JI-.r_bt LTR 2.45 0.096 56.5 1.000 147 0.50 0.0 Wof or Foomart J.. e' _ City Cfork Intersection Delay = 10.6 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS a B SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED LT WORKSHEET for exclusive lefts B17EP.doc 3 4 CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Adj Adj Sat Flow Gruen Apgar/ Lane Flaw Rate Flaw Rate Ratio Ratio MvWt Group (v) (s) (vie) (g/C) ® _, --Lane Group— Capacity v/c (c) Ratio Eastbound Pri. 58 1805 # 0.03 0.032 58 1.00 Sec. 167 112 1.49 0.800 90 1.86 Left L 225 0.832 148 1.52 Thru T 806 1900 0.42 0.832 1581 0.51 Right Westbound Pri. Sec. Left Thru T 1294 1900 0.68 0.768 1459 0.89 Right, R 646 1615 0.40 0.904 1460 0.44 Northbound Pri. Sec, Left Thru Right Southbound Pri. Sec, Left Thru LTR 360 1531 th 0.24 0.096 147 2.45 Right Sum (v/s) critical - 1.07 Lost Time/Cycle, L - 8.00 sec Critical v/c(X) - 1.14 LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEET Appr/ Ratios Unf Prog Lana Incremental Res Lane Group Approach Lane Del Adj Grp Factor Del Del Grp v/c g/C di Fact Cap k d2 d3 Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 1.52 0.832 38.8 1.000 148 0.50 970.6 0.0 T 0.51 0.832 3.1 1.000 1561 0.12 0.3 0.0 3.3 A 3.3 A Westbound T 0,89 0,768 10.6 1.000 1459 0.50 9.3 0.0 19.8 B 19.8 B R 0.44 0.904 1.0 1.000 1460 0.11 0.2 0.0 1.2 A Northbound rocord in c;onnoc i on with Southb❑und i$om 0-b on JI-.r_bt LTR 2.45 0.096 56.5 1.000 147 0.50 0.0 Wof or Foomart J.. e' _ City Cfork Intersection Delay = 10.6 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS a B SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED LT WORKSHEET for exclusive lefts B17EP.doc 3 4 El 0 APPROACH EB Cycle Length, C 125.0 sec Actual Creon Time for Lane Group, G Effective Green Time for Lane Group, g Opposing Effective Green Time, go Number of Lanes in Lana Group, N Number of Opposing Lanes, No Adjusted Left -Turn Flaw Rata, Vlt Proportion of Left Turns in Opposing Flow, Plto Adjusted Opposing Plow Rats, Vo Lost Time for Lane Oroup, tl Left Turns per Cycle: LTC-V1tC/3600 Opposing Flow per Lana, Per Cycle: Volc-VoC/3600fluo Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo (Table 9-2 or Eqn 9-7) gf-[Goxp(- a * (LTC ** b))] -t1, gf<-g Opposing Queue Ratio: qro-l-Rpo(go/C) gq-(4.943Volc**0.762)[(gro**1.061)-tl], gq<-g gu -g-gq if gq>-gf, -9-gf if gq<gf n=(gq`gf)/2, n> -C Pthoml-Pito P1*mPlt[l+{(N-1)g/(gf+gu/Ell+4.24))) Ell (Figure 9--7) El2=(1-Ptho**n)/Plto, E12>=1.0 fmin-2(1+P1t)/g or fmin-2(1+P1)/g gdiff-max(gq-gf,0) fnt=[gf/gj+[gu/g][1/{1+P1(Eli-1)}], (minnfmin;max=1.00) flt=fm=[g£/g]+gdiff[l/fl+Plt(E12-1)}] WB KB sn 104.0 100.00 96.0 1 1 225 0.00 1294 4.00 7.81 44.93 1.00 0.0 0.23 74.16 25.84 37.08 1.00 1.00 4,39 1.00 0.04 0.00 0.06 +[gu/g][1/(1+Plt(Ei1-1}],(tnina£tuin;maxnl.0) or flt=[fm+0.91(N-1)]/N** fit 0.059 For special case of single -lane approach opposed by multilane approach, see text. +� If P1>=1 for shared left -turn lanes with N>1, than assume do-faoto left -turn lana and redo calculations. *+► For permitted left -turns with multiple exclusive left -turn lanes, flt-fm. For special case of multilane approach opposed by single -lane approach or when gf>gq, see text. UPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED LT WORKSHEET for shared lefts APPROACH EB Cycle Length, C 125.0 sec Actual Green Time for Lane Oroup, 0 Effective Green Time for Lane Group, g Opposing Effective Green Time, go Number of Lanae in Lane Group, N Number of Opposing Lanes, No Adjusted Left -Turn Flow Rate, Vlt Proportion of Left Turns in Lane Group, Pit Proportion of Left Turns in Opposing Flaw, Pita Adjusted Opposing Flow Rate, Vo Lost Time for Lane Group, tl Loft Turns per Cycle: LTC-V1tC/3600 Opposing Flow per Lane, Per Cycle: Volc-VoC/3600fluo Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo (Table 9-2 or Eqn 9-7) gf-[Gexp(- a * (LTC ** b))]-tl, gf<=g Opposing Queue Ratio: qro-l-Rpo(go/C) gq-(4.943Volc**0.762)((gro**1.061)-tl], gq<-g gu =g-gq if gq>=gf, -g-gf if gq<gf n=(gq-gf)/2, n>-0 Ptho-1-Plto Pl-=Plt[l+((N-1)g/(gf+gu/E11+4.24))) Ell (Figure 9-7) E12=(1-Ptho**n)/Pito, E12>=1.0 fmin=2(1+Plt)/g or fmina2(1+P1)/g gdiff-max(gq-gf,0) (min=fmin;max=1.00) B 17EP.doc WB ND SB Sebr [Yted into the pul)1[c rocord in 1MOCtIon with item P2 P3 on .1J_-,F4l_ Waiter ragman City 0101k 4 flt=fradEg£/g]+gdi /{S+Plt(ElZ-1)}] +[gu/g][S/(1+P1t(E11-1)j,(min�fntin,max�S.0) or fltA(fm+n.91(N-1)]/N## flt Primary 46 For special case of single -lana approach opposed by multilane approach, see tent. +� if P1>-1 for shared left -turn lanes with N>l, then assume do -facto left -turn lane and redo calculations. «w For permitted left -turns with multiple exclusive loft --turn lanes, flt-fm. For special case of multilane approach opposed by single -lane approach or when g£>gq, see text. SUPPLEMENTAL UNIFORM DELAY WORKSHEET EBLT WHLT NBLT SBLT Adj. LT Vol from Vol Adjustment Worksheet, v 225 v/c ratio from Capacity Worksheet, X 1.85 Primary phase effective green, g 100.00 Secondary phase effective green, gq 74.16 (from Supplemental Permitted LT Worksheet), gu 25.B4 Cycle length, C 125.0 Red =(C-g-gq-gu), r 21.0 Arrivals: v/(3600(max(X,1.0))), qa 0.04 Primary ph. departures: s/3600, sp 0.501 Secondary ph. departures: s(gq+gu)/(gu#3600), ss 0.12 XPorm 1.32 XProt 0.51 XCaso 3 Queue at begining of green arrow, Qa I.B6 Queue at beginning of unsaturated green. Qu 3.05 Residual, queue, Qr 1.00 Uniform Delay, dl 3B•8 --.DELAY/LOS WORKSHEET WITH INITIAL QUEUE Initial Dur. Uniform Delay Initial Final Initial Lane Appr/ Unmet Unmet I Queue Unmet Queue Group Lane Demand Demand Unadj. Adj. Param. Demand Delay Delay Group Q veh t hrs. ds dl sec u Q veh d3 sec d sec Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Inter6ection Delay 10.6 sec/veh Intersection LOS B rd U BPEP.doc Walter Foofflon City C lofk 5 E El APPENDIX B Existing Roadway Link Level of Service v ic, public Submilta�,l W!"O , rocord ir� with Item 'JEM-p-L Wat,,L,Of F'(),omarl City Cierk ROYAL SAY ESTATES TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY C= 0 O .g CL 7 e•-1 oir25200b CD � e� �3 11 _ a° mom mm s • ����00© • r . - • i SW 17th Avenue - c1� • - •a ©mm©�� '�� m© ' ' i��© C= 0 O .g CL 7 e•-1 oir25200b CD � e� �3 11 _ a° C= 0 ® 0 APPENDIX C Intersection Level of Service for Future Traffic Volumes Without Project Submitted Into tho publIC record in connection with item�' on .-1.1.-.1-� t 0 10 Jackson M. Ahlstodt Jackson M. Ahlstodt, P.E. Jackson M. Ahlstodt, P.E. 46 N.W. 94th Street Miami Shares, Florida 33150 Pham: (305) 754-8695 E -Mail; HCS: Signals Release 3.1 Fax: (305) 754-8695 OPERATIONAL. ANALYSIS Intersection: S BAYSHORE/5W 17TH AVE City/State: MIAMI/FLA Analyst: J. AHLSTEDT Project No: ROYAL BAY ESTATES Time period Analyzed: FUTURE W/O PROJECT PM PEAK Date: 1/25/01 EastNdast Street Name: S BAYSHORE North/South Street Name: SW 17TH AVE VOLUME [IATA........ Eastbound I Westbound J Northbound I Southbound I L T R J L T R I L T R I L T R I Volume 1144 749 j 1335 G50 j 1123 0 125 1 PHF 10.59 0.84 1 0.94 0.99 J 10.73 0.94 0.57 1 PK 15 Vol 161 223 1 355 175 I 142 0 55 1 Hi Ln Val I I I I I % Grade 1 0 J 0 I 1 0 I Ideal Sat 11900 1900 1 1900 1900 1 J 1900 1 ParkExist J { ] { f NumPark 1 1 1 { { Heavy Veh10 0 1 0 0 I 10 0 0 1 No. Lanes I 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 J LGConfig I L T I T R 1 J LTR I Lane Width 112.0 12.0 1 12.0 12.0 1 1 12.0 1 RTOR Vol 1 I 0 I 1 0 I Adi Plow 1244 092 J 1420 699 { 1 367 J %InSharedL.n1 I I I f Prop Turns 1 { J 10.43 0.57 1 1ti7wnPeds 0 I 0 1 0 1 NumBus 10 0 J 0 0 1 { 0 1 Duration 1.00 Area Type: All other areas OPERATING PARAMETERS_ ---- _ _ 1 Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound 1 Southbound { 1 L T R 1 L T R 1 L T R I L T R J Init Untnet 10.0 0.0 1 0.0 0.0 1 J 0.0 J Arriv. TypeJ3 3 1 3 3 J 1 Unit Ext. 13.0 3.0 J 3.0 3.0 1 I 3.0 I Factor 1 1.000 I 1.000 { 1 1.000 J Last Time 12.0 2.0 1 2.0 2.0 { J 2.0 1 Ext of g 12.0 2.0 { 2.0 2.0 J 1 2.0 1 Ped Min 8 1 0.0 J 0.0 1 I 0.0 1 PHASE DATA........- ATAPhase PhaseCombination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 6 ED Left A P I NB Left c iub ittc%d into tho, pUbllo Thru A P I Thru Right I Right record in connoctl0I1 WIPh Peds I Pad horn FL -!L orl _&!"- / B17FP.doc Walter i oornad City Clerk L E WE Left Thru Right Peds N9 Right SB Right 11 0 SB Left A P Thru A P Right A I Ped Green 5.0 96.0 Yellen 3.0 4.0 All Red 0.0 1.0 EB Right WB Right A 12.0 4.0 0.0 Cycle Length: 125,0 secs -- -.- - VOLUME ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET Adjusted Prop. Prop. Appr./ Mvt Flow No. Fane Flow Rate Loft Right Movement Volume PHF Rate Lanes Group RTOR In Lana Grp Turns Turns Eastbound Left 144 0.59 244 1 L 244 Thru 749 0.84 892 1 T 892 Right 0 Westbound Left 0 Thru 1335 0.94 1420 1 T 1420 Right 650 0.93 699 1 R 0 699 Northbound Left 0 Thru 0 Right 0 Southbound Left 123 0.73 168 0 Thru 0 0.94 0 1 LTR 387 0.43 0.57 Right 125 0.57 219 a 0 Value entered by user. SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET Appr/ Ideal Adj Lane Sat f f f f f f f f f Sart Group Flow W HV G P HH A LU RT LT flow Eastbound Sec LT Adj/LT Sat: L 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.400 1.000 1.00 1.00 ---- 0.950 1805 T 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.000 1.000 1900 Westbound Sec LT Adj/LT Sat: T 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1,000 1.00 1.00 1.000 1.000 1900 It 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 1..00 0.850 ---- 1615 Northbound Soc LT Adj/LT Sat: Southbound Sec LT Adj/LT Sat: LTR 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 11000 1.000 1.00 1.00 0.824 0.979 1532 B17BP.dac ;u'or ail'.. _ ,., :3 i`lr; public 2 ro cord iri -10- ,100, on with Itern x' oil I jd ud � Waitor 6=oeman City 0100c Westbound T 0.97 0.768 13.3 1.000 1459 0.50 28.3 0.0 41.6 D 41.6 D R 0.46 0.904 1.0 1,000 1460 0.11 0.2 0.0 1.3 A northbound Southbound LTR 2.63 0.096 56.5 1.000 147 0.50 0.0 Intersection Delay a 21.0 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED LT WORKSHEET for exclusive lefts B17FP.doc SOubmitteci into th() 190110 3 record In connoc;tIon with item PI -3 ars Walter Foomari 1. 2 3 4 04 Clod< CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEET_„_, Adj Adj Sat Flow Green Appr/ Lane Flaw Rate Flow Rate Ratio patio Mvmt Croup (v) (s) (v/s) (g/C) 0 --Lane group-- Capacity v/c (c) Ratio Eastbound Pri. 50 1805 0.03 0.032 58 1,00 Sec, 1B6 0.800 Left L 244 0.832 Thru T 892 1900 0.47 0.832 1581 0.56 Right Wostbound Pri. Sec. Left Thru T 1420 1900 0.75 0.768 1459 0.97 Right R 619 1615 0.43 0.904 1460 0.48 Northbound Pri, Sec. Left Thru Right Southbound Pri. Sec. Left Thru LTR 3137 1532 0.25 0.096 147 2.63 Right Sum (v/s) critical = 0.00 List Time/Cycle, L , 0.00 sec Critical v/C(X) = 0.00 LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEET Appr/ Ratios Unf Prog Lane Incremental Res Lane Group Approach Lane __, Del Adj Grp Factor Del Del Grp v/C g/C dl Fact Cap k d2 d3 Delay LOS delay LOS Eastbound L 0.832 1.000 0.0 T 0.56 0.832 3.3 1.000 1581 0.16 0.5 0.0 3.8 A 3.6 A Westbound T 0.97 0.768 13.3 1.000 1459 0.50 28.3 0.0 41.6 D 41.6 D R 0.46 0.904 1.0 1,000 1460 0.11 0.2 0.0 1.3 A northbound Southbound LTR 2.63 0.096 56.5 1.000 147 0.50 0.0 Intersection Delay a 21.0 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED LT WORKSHEET for exclusive lefts B17FP.doc SOubmitteci into th() 190110 3 record In connoc;tIon with item PI -3 ars Walter Foomari 1. 2 3 4 04 Clod< L CA APPROACH EB Cycle Length, C 125.0 sec Actual (been Time for Lane Group, 0 Effective Green Time for Lane Group, 5 Opposing Effective Green Time, go Number of Lanes in Lane Group, N Number of Opposing Lanes, NO Adjusted Left -Turn Flow Rate, Vlt Proportion of Left Turns in Opposing Flow, Plto Adjusted Opposing Flow Rate, Vo Lost Time for Lancs Group, tl Left Turns per Cycle: LTC=VItC/3600 Opposing Flow per Lane, Per Cycle, Volc-VOC/3600fluo Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo (Table 9-2 or Eqn 9-7) gf-[Gexp(- a * (LTC — b))]-tl, gf<-g Opposing Queue Ratio: qro-l-Rpo(go/C) gq=(4.943Volc**0.762)[(gro**1.061)-tl], gq<=g gu -g-gq if gq>-gf, -g-gf if gq<gf n-(gq-g£)/2, n> -O Ptho� 1--Flto P1*=Plt[1+{(N-1)g/(gF-Fgu/E11+4.24))) Eli (figure 9-7) E12=(l-Ptho**n)/Plto, E12> -I.0 fmin#2(1+P1t)/g or fmin=2(1+P1)/g gdiff=max(gq--gf,0) £lt=fm�(gf/g]-rgdiff[i/{1+Plt(E12-1)}} WB NS SB 104.0 100.00 96.0 1 1 244 0.00 1420 4.00 8,47 49.31 1.00 0.0 0.23 100.00 0.00 50.00 1.00 1.00 4.95 1.00 0.04 0,00 0.04 +[gu/g]{1/(1+Plt(E11-1)],(min=fmin;naaxml,0) or fit 0.950 For special Case of single -lane approach opposed by multilane approach, see text. * If Pl>=1 for shared left -turn lanes with N>1, then assume de -facto left -turn lane and redo calculations. #* For permitted left -turns with multiple exclusive left -turn lanes, flt-fm. For special case of multilane approach apposed by single -lane approach or when gf>gq, see text. SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED LT WORKSHEET for shared lefts APPROACH ES Cycle Length, C 125.0 sec Actual Green Time for Lane Group, G Effective Green Time for Lana Group, g Opposing Effective Green Time, go Number of Lanes in Lane Group, N Number of Opposing Lanes, No Adjusted Left -Turn Flow Rate, Vlt Proportion of Left Turns ip Lane Group, Plt Proportion of Left Turns in Opposing Flow, Plto Adjusted Opposing Flow Rate, Vo Lost Time for Lane Group, tl Left Turns per Cycle: LTG=VitC/3600 Opposing Flow per Lane, Per Cycle: VOIc-VOC/3600fluo Opposing Platoon Ratios, Rpo (Table 9-2 or Eqn 9-7) gf=[Gexp(- a * (LTC — b))]-tl, gf<=g Opposing Queue Ratio: qro=l-Rpo(go/C) gq-(4.943Voic**0.762)[(gro**1.061)-tl], gq<=g gu -g-gq if gq>=gf, -g-gf if gq<gf n-(gq-gf)/2, n> -O Ptho=l-Plto P1*=Plt[1+{(N-1)9/(gf•Fgu/E11+4.24))) Ell (Figure 9-7) E12=(1-Ptho*#n)/Plto, E12>=1.0 fmin-2(1+Plt)/g or fmin-2(1+P1)/g gdiff=max(gq-gf,0) (min-fmin:max=1.00) B17FP.doc WB NB SB Submitiod into V103, Ptablic rocord in On city Glefk :v� fltnfm-[gf/gl+gdi 1/{I+Pit(E12-1)}] 0 +[gu/g}[1/(1+Plt(Ell-L)j,(man�fmin;maxmi.0) or Flt=[fm+0.9l(N-1))/N*# f It Primaary Is For special case of single -lane approach opposed by multilane approach, sea text. If Pl>=1 for shared left -turn lanes with N>1, then assume de -facto left -turn lane and redo calculations. For permitted left -turns with multiple exclusive left -turn lanes, £lt=fm. For special case of multilane approach opposed by single -lane approach or when gf>gq, see text. SUPPLEME ML UNIFORM DELAY WORKSHEET Adj. LT Vol from Vol Adjustment Worksheet, v v/c ratio from Capacity Worksheet, X Primary phase effective green, g Secondary phase effective green, gq (From Supplemental Permitted LT Worksheet), gu Cycle length, C 125.0 Red-(C-g-gq-gu), r Arrivals: v/(3600(max(X,1.0))), qa Primary ph, departures: x/3600, sp Secondary ph, departures: s(gq+gu)/(gu*3600), ss X1'erm Xprot XCase Queue at begining of green arrow, Qa Queue at beginning of unsaturated green, Qu Residual queue, Qr Uniform Delay, dl EBLT WELT NBLT SBLT 244 100.00 100.00 0,00 21.0 0.501 — DELAY/LOS WORKSHEET WITH INITIAL QUEUE Initial Dur. Uniform Delay Initial Final Initial Lane Appr/ Unmet Unmet Queue Unmet Queue Group Lana Demand Demand Unadj. Adj. Param. Demand Delay Delay Group Q veh t hre. ds dl sec u Q veh d3 sec d sec Eastbound Wastbound Northbound Southbound Intersection Delay 21.0 sec/veh Intersection LOS C 10 vocotd it) C-10- no '-"Llon tAh on waltor romflan 1i17FP.doc city 01911 5 7 APPENDIX D Roadway Link Level of Service for Future Traffic Volumes Without Project Submitted lntot!lf; Public roccrd in Kom�i - �� on Walton 1poc[nan 9 0 9 ROYAL BAY ESTATES TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY ... . - - . 1 1-��a1Jl'tr�L:i►3►l�Y+L7L1t�0�00 . • . . • - •• •�C11�L:1L•1►�15�1�®© i • �. � - { / � . 1 1 1 f 1 •• 1 • 1 �© SW 17th - •�f A ©mm�.. : t 1 1. 1 4 1 1 1 1 �'y'�'�-j CSiliu�� I CD s � 0:3 11 0 APPENDIX E Intersection Level of Service for Future Traffic Volumes With Project Submitted irrto tIlp public record irr COMIN-fl n with Vlfaite r Foernan City Cleric :7 v Jackson M. Ahlstedt ,Jackson M. Ahlstedt, P.E. Jackson M. Ahlstedt, P.E. 46 N.W. 94th Street Miami Shares, Florida 33150 Phone: (305) 754-8695 E -Mail: Intersection: City/State: Analyst: Project No: Time Period Analyzed: Date: East/West Street dame: North/South Street dame: 0 HCS: Sjgnale Releaae 3.1 Fax: (305) 754-6695 _OPERATIONAL ANALYSI S BAYSHORE/SW 17TH AVE MIAMI/FLA J. AHLSTEDT ROYAL DAY ESTATES F=RE W/PROSECT PM PEAK 1/25/01 S HAYSHORE SW 17TH AVE VOLUME DATA OPERATING# PARAMETERS Eastbound { Westbound I Northbound ( Southbound 1 L T R 1 L T R { L T R I L T R I Volume 1144 - 750 I { 1336 I 650 1 1123 0 125 { PHF 10.59 0.84 1 0.94 0.93 1 10.73 0.94 0.57 I PK 15 Vol 161 223 1 355 175 1 142 0 55 I Hi Ln Vol I 1 2.0 1 1 I l 1 2.0 2.0 1 I % Grade 1 0 I 0 I I 0 I Ideal Sat 11900 1900 1 1900 1900 I I 1900 1 ParkExist 1 1 2 I 1 I ED Left I NumPark I Left I I I A P I % Heavy Veh10 0 1 0 0 1 10 0 0 I No. Canes I 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 I 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 LOConfig I L T i T R 1 I LTR 1 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 1 17..0 12.0 1 1 1210 I RTOR Vol 1 1 0 1 1 0 Adj Flow 1244 593 1 1421 699 1 I 307 I %1nSharedLn1 I I I I Prop Turns I I I 10.43 0.57 1 NumPeds I 1 0 1 0 1 0 I NumBus 10 0 i 0 o I I o I Duration 1.00 Area Type: All other areas OPERATING# PARAMETERS City Gledt 1 Eastbound 1 Westbound 1 Northbound 1 Southbound I 1 L T R { L T R i L T R I L T R I Init Unmet 10.0 0.0 I 0.0 0.0 1 I 0.0 1 Arriv. Type13 3 { 3 3 I I 3 1 Unit Ext. 13,0 3.0 1 3.0 3.0 I 1 3.0 1 I Factor 1 1.000 I 1.000 1 1 1.000 1 Lost Time 12.0 2.0 I 2.0 2.0 1 1 2.0 1 Ext of S 12.0 2.0 1 2.0 2.0 1 I 2.0 1 Ped Min g 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 I 0.0 1 PHASE DATA Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 ED Left A P I NB Left SUbrfll'ikud iiltO 010 1''ilAHC Thru A P I Thru rocont Irl with Is Right I Right r� oi, ,[_ _1 't}1_J E�0!F71 Peds 1 Ped A -F-3 - B17PP.doc welter FooA nark City Gledt WB Left SB Left A Thru P I Thru A Right P I Right A Peds I Pad NB Right I EB Right I SD Right I WB Right A I I Groan 5.0 96.0 12.0 Yellow 3.0 4.0 4.0 All Red 0.0 1.0 0.0 Cycle Length: 125.0 sacs VOLUME ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET Adjusted Prop. Prop. Appr./ Mvt Flaw No. Lane Flow Rata Left Right Movement Volume PHF Rata Lanes Group RTOR In Lane Carp Turns Turns Eastbound LeFt 144 0.59 244 1 L 244 Thru 750 0.84. B93 1 T 893 Right 0 Westbound Left 0 Thru 1336 0.94 1421 1 T 1421 Right 650 0.93 699 1 R 0 699 Northbound Left 0 Thru 0 Right 0 Southbound Left 123 0.73 168 0 Thru 0 0.94 0 1 LTR 367 0.43 0.57 Right 125 0.57 219 0 0 Value entered by user. SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET-_�_ , Appr/ Ideal Adj Lane Sat f £ £ f F f f f f Sat Group Flow W HV 4 P BB A LU RT LT Flow Eastbound Sec LT Adj/LT Sat: L 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 1.00 ----- 0.950 1805 T 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.000 1.000 1900 Westbound Sec LT Adj/LT Sat: T 1900 1.000 1,000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.000 1.000 1900 R 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 1.00 0.850 ----- 1615 Northbound Seo LT Adj/LT Sat: Southbound Sec LT Adj/LT Sat: LTR. 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 1.00 0.824 0.979 1532 B17PP.doc `�U�j "r+�'.': _,;.' l`" -q the public 2 Ile \N-&j4,o( Foe man Appr/ Lane Mvmt Croup ---- Adj Flow Rate (V) CAPACITY ANALYSIS Adj Sat Flew Flow Rate Ratio (s) (V/s) WORKSHEET_� Green Ratio WC) --Lane Group— Capacity V/c (c) Ratio Eastbound Last Time/Cycle, L W 0.00 sec Critical. V/c(X) - 0.00 Pri. 58 1805 0.03 0.032 58 1.00 Sec. 186 Prog Lane Incremental Res 0.800 Approach Lame Left L 244 Grp Factor Del Del 0.632 - - -- Grp V/c g/C Thru T 893 1900 0.47 0.832 1581 0.56 Right L 0.832 Westbound 1.000 0.0 T 0.56 0,632 Pri. 1.000 1561 0.16 0.5 0.0 3.8 A 3.8 A Sec. Left Thru T 1421 1900 0.75 0.768 1459 0.97 Right R 699 1615 0.43 0.904 1460 0.48 Northbound Pri. Sec. Left Thru Right Southbound Pri, Sec. Left Thru LTR 387 1532 0.25 0.096 147 2.63 Right Westbound T 0.97 0.768 13.3 1.000 1459 0.50 28.6 0.0 42.0 D 42.0 D R 0.48 0.904 1.0 1.000 1460 0.11 0.2 0.0 1.3 A Northbound SubmIRM into tho publiv, record 101 ;,Oti!^�'EiCif`l 4}li!1 Southbound 4c'm rJW- , OI1 LTR 2.63 0,096 56.5 1.000 147 0.50 0.0 il)/aftef 1-UEtI` an Ciiy �!.3ti� Intersection Delay - 21.2 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS - C Adubk qPSUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED LT WORKSHEET for exclusive lefts li 17PP, doe 3 Sura (v/s) critical n 0.00 Last Time/Cycle, L W 0.00 sec Critical. V/c(X) - 0.00 LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEET Appr/ Ratios Llnf Prog Lane Incremental Res Lane Group Approach Lame Dal Adj Grp Factor Del Del - - -- Grp V/c g/C dl Fact Cap k d2 d3 Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 0.832 1.000 0.0 T 0.56 0,632 3.3 1.000 1561 0.16 0.5 0.0 3.8 A 3.8 A Westbound T 0.97 0.768 13.3 1.000 1459 0.50 28.6 0.0 42.0 D 42.0 D R 0.48 0.904 1.0 1.000 1460 0.11 0.2 0.0 1.3 A Northbound SubmIRM into tho publiv, record 101 ;,Oti!^�'EiCif`l 4}li!1 Southbound 4c'm rJW- , OI1 LTR 2.63 0,096 56.5 1.000 147 0.50 0.0 il)/aftef 1-UEtI` an Ciiy �!.3ti� Intersection Delay - 21.2 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS - C Adubk qPSUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED LT WORKSHEET for exclusive lefts li 17PP, doe 3 NB SB +[gu/g]L1/(I+PIt (EI 1-1)],(min-fmin;ntax=1.0) or fIt= [fm+0.91(N-1)]/N** fit 0.950 For special case of single -lane approach apposed by multilane approach, see text. * If P1>=1 for shared left -turn lanes with N>1, then assume do -facto ddnkleft-turn lane and redo calculations. *# For permitted left -turns with multiple exclusive left -turn lanes, flt=fm. For special case of multilane approach opposed by single -lane approach or when gf>gq, see text. -----SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED LT WORKSHEET for shared lefts APPROACH EB Cycle Length, C 125.0 sec Actual Green Time for Lane Group, G Effective Green Time for Lana Group, g Opposing Effective Green Time, go Number of Lanes in Lane Group, N Number of Opposing Lanes, No Adjusted Left -Turn Flow Rats, Vlt Proportion of Left Turns in Lane Group, Pit Proportion of Left Turns in Opposing flow, Pita Adjusted Opposing Flow Rate, Vo Lost Time for Lane Group, tl Left Turns per Cycle: LTC-VltC/3600 Opposing Flow per Lane, Per Cycle; Volc=VoC/3600£luo Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo ('Table 9-2 or Eqa 9-7) gf=[Gexp(- a * (LTC ** b))]-tl, gf<-g Opposing Queue Ratio: qro-1-•Rpo(go/C) gq-(4.943Volc**0.762)[(gro*#1.061)-t1], gq<=g Yu =g-gq if gq>-gf, =g-gf if gq<g£ n-(gq-gf)/2, 0=0 Ptho-l-P1to P1*aPlt[1-r{tN--1)g/{gf+gu/E11•�•4.24)) ) Ell (Figure 9-7) E12-(1-Ptho**n)/Pito, E12>=1.0 fmin=2(1+Plt)/g or fmin=2(1+P1)/g gdiff-max(gq-gf,0) (min-fmin;max-1.00) B l 7PP, do c WB N8 SB Submittal into tiro public rocord in ,o?fic,,o on with Item .P.? on Vapor i=ooman City clefl( 4 APPROACH EB WB Cycle Length, C 125.0 sec Actual Green Time for Lane Group, G Effective Green Time for Lana Group, g 104.0 100.00 Opposing Effective Careen Time, go 96.0 Number of Lanes in bane Group. N 1 Number of Opposing Lanes, No 1 Adjusted Left -Turn Flow Rata, Vlt 244 Proportion of Left Turns in Opposing Flow. Plto 0.00 Adjusted Opposing Flow Rate, Vo 1421 Lost Time for Lane Group, t1 4.00 Left Turns per Cycle: LTC-V1tC/3600 8.47 Opposing Flow per Lane, Per Cycle: Volc-VoC/3600fluo 49.34 Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo (Table 9-2 or Eqn 9-7) 1.00 gf-[Gexp(- a * (LTC ** b))]-tl, gf<ag 0.0 Opposing Queue Ratio: qrn=l-Rpo(go/C) 0.23 gq-(4.943Volc**0.762)I(gro**1.061)-tl), gq<=g 100.00 gu -g-gq if gq>=gf, =g-gf if gq<gf 0.00 n=(gq-gf)/2, n>=0 50.00 Ptho=l-Plto 1.00 pl*=Plt[l+{(N-I)g/(gf+gu/E11+4.24))) 1.00 Ell (Figure 9-7) 4.95 E12-(I-Ptho**n)/Plto, E12>-1.0 1.00 fmin=2(l+PIt)/0 or fmin=2(1+P1)/g 0.04 gdiffmmax(gq-g£,0) 0.00 (mina6min,max=1.00) 0.04 flt=fm=[gf/g]+gdif£[1/{1rPlt(E12 I))] NB SB +[gu/g]L1/(I+PIt (EI 1-1)],(min-fmin;ntax=1.0) or fIt= [fm+0.91(N-1)]/N** fit 0.950 For special case of single -lane approach apposed by multilane approach, see text. * If P1>=1 for shared left -turn lanes with N>1, then assume do -facto ddnkleft-turn lane and redo calculations. *# For permitted left -turns with multiple exclusive left -turn lanes, flt=fm. For special case of multilane approach opposed by single -lane approach or when gf>gq, see text. -----SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED LT WORKSHEET for shared lefts APPROACH EB Cycle Length, C 125.0 sec Actual Green Time for Lane Group, G Effective Green Time for Lana Group, g Opposing Effective Green Time, go Number of Lanes in Lane Group, N Number of Opposing Lanes, No Adjusted Left -Turn Flow Rats, Vlt Proportion of Left Turns in Lane Group, Pit Proportion of Left Turns in Opposing flow, Pita Adjusted Opposing Flow Rate, Vo Lost Time for Lane Group, tl Left Turns per Cycle: LTC-VltC/3600 Opposing Flow per Lane, Per Cycle; Volc=VoC/3600£luo Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo ('Table 9-2 or Eqa 9-7) gf=[Gexp(- a * (LTC ** b))]-tl, gf<-g Opposing Queue Ratio: qro-1-•Rpo(go/C) gq-(4.943Volc**0.762)[(gro*#1.061)-t1], gq<=g Yu =g-gq if gq>-gf, =g-gf if gq<g£ n-(gq-gf)/2, 0=0 Ptho-l-P1to P1*aPlt[1-r{tN--1)g/{gf+gu/E11•�•4.24)) ) Ell (Figure 9-7) E12-(1-Ptho**n)/Pito, E12>=1.0 fmin=2(1+Plt)/g or fmin=2(1+P1)/g gdiff-max(gq-gf,0) (min-fmin;max-1.00) B l 7PP, do c WB N8 SB Submittal into tiro public rocord in ,o?fic,,o on with Item .P.? on Vapor i=ooman City clefl( 4 11 flt)] +[guilt][1�(1+flt(E11-1)j,(min�fmin:max-1.0) or flt�[Em+Ci.91(i1-I)]/iQ� flt Primary For special care of single -lane approach opposed by multilane approach, see text. If Pl>=1 for shared left -turn lanes with N>1, then assume de --facto loft -turn lana and redo calculations. ** For permitted left --turns with multiple exclusive left -turn lanes, £ltafm. For special case of multilane approach opposed by single --lane approach or when gf>gq, see text. SUPPLEMENTAL UNIFORM DELAY WORKSHEET Adj. LT Vol from Vol Adjustment Worksheet, v v/c ratio from Capacity Worksheet, X Primary phase effective green, g Secondary phase effective green, gq (From Supplemental Permitted LT Workshoot), gu Cycle length, C 125.0 Red =(C-g-9q-gu), r Arrivals: v/(36Q0(max(X,1.0))), qa Primary ph. departures: s/3600, sp Secondary ph, departures: s(gq+gu)/(gu*3600), ss XPerm Xprot XCase Queue at begining of green arrow, Qa Queue at beginning of unsaturated green, Qu Residual queue. Qr Uniform Delay, di EBLT WELT NBLT SHLT 244 100.00 100.00 0.00 21.0 0.501 _ --- _---- -- DELAY/LOS WORKSHEET WITH INITIAL QUEUE Initial Dur. Uniform Delay Initial Final Initial Lane Appr/ Unmet Unmet Queue Unmet Queue Croup Lane Demand Demand Unadj. Adj. Param. Demand Delay Delay Group Q veh t hrs. ds dl sec u Q veh d3 sec d sec Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Intersection Delay 21.2 sec/veh B17PP.doo Intersection LOS C Submitted into the public record in connoction with itomA Z 3_ _. on Walter Fooinan City 61011( L L APPENDIX F Roadway Link Level of Service for Future Traffic Volumes With project Subs nittod into the public record In co nrnr,�,Iion with ROM 11--j or) 11V�Ac,r ijr .oman city Clerk j. }34 ROYAL BAY ESTATES TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY L �J FFTI RE r . • / e 1000©L�t�Li}�rJ�TAM r r !r]I.��+III�]��� �5Kom 0112512001 o _-IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII'-■--III._-IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII1-�--� IT-17V mo m- 49 0112512001 o J El APPENDIX G Level of Service For Future Plus Project Traffic Volumes With Intersection Modifications Subrnitwd into the, PUblic r©cord in cUrinoclion with item.-__ on w,-11tcr rroman Jackson M. Ahlstedt Jackson M. Ablstedt, P.E. Jackson M. Ahlstedt, P.E. 46 N.W. 94th Street Miami Shores, Florida 33150 Phone: ( 305 ) 754--8695 E -Mail: HCS; Signals Release 3.1 Fax: (305) 754-8695 OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Intersection: S EAYSHORE/SW 171H AVE 3 3 1 City/State; 3.0 1 MIAMI/FLA 3.0 1 I Factor 1 Analyst: 1.000 J. AHLSTEDT Lost Time 12.0 2.0 1 Project No: 2.0 J ROYAL BAY ESTATES Ext of g 12.0 2.0 1 2.0 Time Period Analyzed: FUTURE W/PROJECT PM PEAK -MOD 0.0 1 0.0 1 Date: 1/25/01 PHASE ©ATA_,_,^ East/West Street dame: S BAYSHORE _ Phase Combination 1 2 North/South Street Name: SW 17TH AVE EB Left A P 1 NB Left VOLUME DATA A P 1 Thru Right I Right I Eaetbound I Westbound I Northbound ( Southbound 1 Ped 1 L T R 1 L T R 1 L T R 1 L T R 1 Volume 1144 750 1 1336 650 I 1123 0 125 1 PHF 10.59 0.04 1 0.94 0.93 1 10.73 0.94 0.57 1 PK 15 Vol 161 223 1 355 175 1 142 0 55 1 Hi Ln Vol I I I I I o Grade 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 I Ideal Sat 11900 1900 1 1900 1900 1 1 1900 1 ParkExist 1 Affik NumPark 1 MM i Heavy Veh10 q wr No. Lanes 1 1 1 0 LGConfig I L T Lane Width 112.0 12.0 RTOR Vol I Adj Flow 1244 893 %InSharedLnl Prop Turns 1 Nut-aPods 1 NumBus 10 0 El Duration 1.00 0 0 q 1 1 T R 12.0 12.0 n 1421 699 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 LTR I 1 12.0 I I 0 I I 3B7 I I 10.43 0.57 I n I Q I E 0 Area Type: All other areas OPERATING PARAMETERS-- - _ - 1 Eastbound 1 Westbound 1 Northbound 1 Southbound I 1 L T R { L T R 1 L T R 1 L T R 1 Init Unmet 10.0 0.0 1� 0.0 0.0 1 �! 0.0 1 Arriv. Type13 3 1 3 3 1 Unit Ext. 13.0 3.0 1 3.0 3.0 1 I Factor 1 1.000 1 1.000 1 Lost Time 12.0 2.0 1 2.0 2.0 J Ext of g 12.0 2.0 1 2.0 2.0 1 Ped Ming 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 PHASE ©ATA_,_,^ - -- _ Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 EB Left A P 1 NB Left Thru A P 1 Thru Right I Right Peds [ Ped 3 I 3.0 1 1.nnn 1 2.0 { 2.0 1 0.0 I 5 6 7 8 ""ubrnittod into th , public rocord in r;c,vmor l.tion with atom I? - I- or) lb -1 -91 -AL Walter ("w"111al1 City CRA WB Left I SB Left A Thru P I Thru A Right P I Right A Pads J Ped NB Right j EB Right 1 SH Right J WB Right A I I Green 5,0 94.0 14,0 Yellow 3.0 4.0 4.0 All Red 0.0 1.0 0.0 Cycle Length: 125.0 secs _...__ VOLUME ADJUSTMENT` WORKSHEET_ - Adjusted Prop. Prop. Appr./ Mvt Flow No. Lane Flaw Rate Left Right Movement Volume PHF Rate Lanes Group RTOR In Lane Grp Turns Turns Eastbound Left 144 0.59 244 1 L 244 Thru 750 0.84 893 1 T 893 Right 0 Westbound Left 0 Thru 1336 0.94 1421 1 T 1421 Right 650 0.93 699 1 R 0 699 Northbound Left 0 Thru 0 Right 0 Southbound Left 123 0.73 168 0 Thru 0 0.94 0 1 LTR 387 0.43 0.57 Right 125 0.57 219 0 0 # Value entered by user. SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET Appr/ Ideal Adj Lane Sat f f f f f f f f f Sat Group Flow W HV G P BB A LU RT LT Flow Eastbound Sec LT Adj/LT Sat! L 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 1.00 ----- 0.950 1805 T 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 1.00 1,000 1.000 1900 Wastbound Sec LT Adj/LT Sat: T 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.000 1.000 1900 R 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 1.00 0.850 ---- 1615 Northbound Sec LT Adj/LT Sat: Southbound Sec LT Adj/LT Sat: LTi: 1900 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 1.00 0.824 0.979 1532 B17PPM.doc Submitted if'flo th(-,, PUNIC; 2 record in connocticn With itom P? -3 on !L- - '1- 9 3 4 Walton Foornan City clork Westbound T 0.99 0.752 15.2 1.000 1429 0.50 42.7 0.0 58.0 E 58.0 E R 0.48 0.904 1.0 1,000 1460 0.11 0.2 0.0 1.3 A Northbound Submitted into the public rocorCL in connection with Southbound iturn p� `1` LTR 2.25 0.112 55,5 1.000 172 0.50 0.0 Walter Foefflai city clerks Intersection Delay = 29.0 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C SUPPLEMt4TAL PERMITTED LT WORKS1fEET - for exclusive lefts B 17PPM.doc 3 CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Sum (vis) critical = 0.00 Adj Adj Sat Flow Green --Lana Group— Appr/ Lane Flow Rete Flow Rates Ratio Ratio Capacity vlc Mvmt Group (v) (s) (V/s) WC) (c) Ratio Eastbound Approach Lane Del Adj Grp Factor Pri. 58 1805 0.03 0.092 56 1.00 Sec. 186 Delay LOS Delay LOS 0.764 Left L 244 0,016 L 0.816 Thru T 693 1900 0.47 0.016 1550 0.58 Right 1.000 1550 0.17 0.5 0.0 4.5 A 4.5 A Westbound Pri. Sec. Left Thru T 1421 1900 0.75 0.752 1429 0.99 Right R 699 1615 0.43 0.904 1460 0,48 Northbound Pri. Sec, Left Thru Right Southbound Pri. Sec. Left Thru LTR 387 1532 0,25 0.112 172 2.25 Right Westbound T 0.99 0.752 15.2 1.000 1429 0.50 42.7 0.0 58.0 E 58.0 E R 0.48 0.904 1.0 1,000 1460 0.11 0.2 0.0 1.3 A Northbound Submitted into the public rocorCL in connection with Southbound iturn p� `1` LTR 2.25 0.112 55,5 1.000 172 0.50 0.0 Walter Foefflai city clerks Intersection Delay = 29.0 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C SUPPLEMt4TAL PERMITTED LT WORKS1fEET - for exclusive lefts B 17PPM.doc 3 Sum (vis) critical = 0.00 Lost Time/Cycle. L - 0.00 sec Critical v/c(X) - 0.00 LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEET_ Appr/ Ratios Unf Prog Lane Incremental Res Lane Group Approach Lane Del Adj Grp Factor Del flea. Grp v/c g/C d1 Tact Cap k d2 d9 Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 0.816 1.000 0.0 T 0.56 0.816 4.0 1.000 1550 0.17 0.5 0.0 4.5 A 4.5 A Westbound T 0.99 0.752 15.2 1.000 1429 0.50 42.7 0.0 58.0 E 58.0 E R 0.48 0.904 1.0 1,000 1460 0.11 0.2 0.0 1.3 A Northbound Submitted into the public rocorCL in connection with Southbound iturn p� `1` LTR 2.25 0.112 55,5 1.000 172 0.50 0.0 Walter Foefflai city clerks Intersection Delay = 29.0 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C SUPPLEMt4TAL PERMITTED LT WORKS1fEET - for exclusive lefts B 17PPM.doc 3 APPROACH Cycle Length, C 125.0 sec Actual Careen Time for Lane Croup, G Effective Green Time for Lane Group, g Opposing Effective Careen Time, go Dumber of Lanes in Lane Group, N Number of Opposing Lanes, No Adjusted Left -Turn Flow Rate, Vlt Proportion of Left Turns in Opposing Flaw, Plto Adjusted Opposing Flaw Rate, Vo Lost Time for Lane Group, tl Left Turns per Cycle: LTC=V1tC/3600 Opposing Flow per Lane, Per Cycle: Volc-VoC/3600fluo Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo (Table 9-2 or Eqn 9-7) gfa[Gexp(- a * (LTC ** b))]•-tl, gf<=g Opposing Queue Ratio: gro-l-Rpo(go/C) gq=(4.943Volc**0.762)[(gro**1.061)-t1], gq<-g Su -g-gq if gq>-gf, =g-gf if gq<gf n=(gq-gf)/2, 0-0 Ptho=i-Plto P1*=Plt[l+{(N-1)g/(gf+gu/Ell+4.24))) Ell (Figure 9-7) E12=(I-Ptho**n)/Plto, E12>a1.0 fmin=2(1+Plt)/g or £min-2(1+P1)/g gdif£-max (gq-gf,0) 113 WH YB SB (min-fmin;max=1.00) flt=fm=[gf/g]+gdiff[1/{1+Plt(E12-1)}] +[gu/g][1/(l+Plt(Ell-1)),(min=fmin;maxm1.0) or fit 0.950 102.0 98.00 94.0 1 1 244 0.00 1421 4.00 8.47 49.34 1.00 0.0 0.25 98.00 0.00 49.00 1.00 1,00 4.95 1.00 0.04 0.00 0.04 For special case of single -lane approach apposed by multilane approach, see text. + If Pl>=1 for shared left -turn lanes with N>1, then assume de -facto left -turn lane and redo calculations. ++� For permitted left -turns with Multiple exclusive left -turn lanes, Elt-fm. For special case of multilane approach apposed by single -lane approach or when gf>gq, see text. SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED LT WORKSHEET for shared lefts APPROACH Cycle Length, C 125.0 sec Actual Green Time for Lane Croup, 0 Effective Breen Time for Lane Group, g opposing Effective Green Time, go Number of Lanes in Lane Group, N Number of Opposing Lanes, No Adjusted Left -Turn Flow Rate, Vlt Proportion of Left Turns in Lane Group. Pit Proportion of Left Turns in Opposing Flow, Pito Adjusted Opposing Flaw Rata, Vo Lost Time for Lana Group, tl Left Turns per Cycle: LTC-VItC/3600 Opposing Flaw per Lane, Per Cycle: Volc-VoC/3600fluo Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo (Table 9-2 or Eqn 9-7) gf-[Gsxp(- a * (LTC ** b))] -t1, gf<-g Opposing Queue patio: qro=l-Rpo(go/C) gq-(4.943Volc**0.762)[(gro**1.061)-tl], gq<-g gu -g-gq if gq>=gf, -g--gf if gq<gf n=(gq-gf)/2, 0=0 Ptho=l-Plto P1*=Plt[1+{(N-1)g/(gf+gu/E11+4.24))) Ell (Figure 9-7) E12=(1--Ptho**n)/Plto, E12>-1.0 fmin=2(1+Plt)/g or fmin-2(1+P1)/g gdiff-max(gq-gf,0) fm=[gf/g]+[gu/g] [1/{1�•P1 (E11-1) }], (min=fmin;max=1.010) B 17PPM. doc EB WB M13 SB Submitted Into tho publle. rocord in cannodion vilth Walter FDeman City Cle1U D_-� �•�, fltwfra=[gf/g]-�•gdi i/{1+Plt(E12-1) }] [gu/g][1/(IrP1t(E11-1)j,(ntin�fmin;rnax�1.4} or flta[Em� 91(t,T-1}j/N flt primary For special case of single -lane approach opposed by multilane approach, see text. If PI> -1 for shared left -turn lanes with N>1, then assume de -facto left -turn lane and redo calculations. +� For permitted left -turns with multiple exclusive left -turn lanes, fltefm. For special case of multilane approach opposed by single -lane approach or when gf>gq, see text. SUPPIEME�3IAL UNIFORM BELAY WORKSHEET. - Adj. LT Vol from Vol Adjustment Worksheet, v v/c ratio from Capacity Worksheet, X Primary phase effective green, g Secondary phase effective green, gq (From Supplemental Permitted LT Worksheet), gu Cycle length, C 125.0 Red 4(C-g-gq-gu), r Arrivals: v/(3600(max(X,1.0))), qa Primary ph. departures: s/3600, sp Secondary ph. departures: s(9gfgu)/(9u*3600), ss XPern XProt XCase Queue at begining of green arrow, Qa Queue at beginning of unsaturated green, Qu Residual queue, Qr Uniform Belay, dl EBLT WBLT NBLT SBLT 244 98,00 98.00 0.00 23.0 0.501 DELAY/LOS WORKSHEET WITH INITIAL QUEUE _ --_--_ Initial Dur. Uniform Belay Initial Final Initial Lane Appr/ Unmet Unmet Queue Unmot Queue Group Lane Demand Demand Unadj. Adj. Param. Demand Delay Delay Group Q veh t hre. de dl sec u Q veh d3 sec d sec Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Intersection Delay 29.0 sec/ve B 17PPM. doc Intersection LOS C Submittod into t'ho public record in coil riucl-flo 0 with !tern on J/ner-OL Waltor Fooiflan City Glcmi< 5 I 2 APPENDIX H Concurrency Analysis Submitted into tiro public rocord in ;C,ilia, 'tlo-n with itoon ?, f! tic CQNCURRENCY AMALYMS The proposed project does not fall within a transportation corridor designated by the City of Miami. Transit service on South Bayshore Drive in the vicinity of the project is limited to a single bus route with 60 minute headways. Thus, that section of South Bayshore Drive can not currently qualify under the guidelines established for Transportation Corridors. City of Miami transportation level of service Policy 1.1.3 states: "Outside designated Transportation Corridors, the roadway vehicular capacity is used in the measurement of peak period LOS. For such limited access, arterial, and collector roadways that are not within designated Transportation Corridors, a minimum peals period LOS standard F (100% of roadway vehicular capacity) will be maintained, except as follows: 1.1.3.1: In the Downtown Special Transportation Area (STA) , 20% of non -State facilities, as identified in the Downtown Miami Development of Regional Impact (DRI), may operate below LOS F; 1.1.3.2 Roadways any operate below the applicable ,minimum if projects which would raise the LOS to the applicable minimum LOS are programmed for construction within the first three years of Dade County's `transportation Improvement Program (which includes the corresponding years of the FDOT Five Year Transportation Plan) or where adequate provision is made by the developer to make improvements necessary to accommodate the impacts of the proposed development concurrent with the development's traffic, generation., 1.1.3.3 Roadway segments may operate below the applicable minimum if they are either (1) legislatively constrained (as for scenic or historical purposes), or (2) less than one mile in length, and where adherence to the City's Land Use Plan assures that no significant deterioration to traffic levels of service will occur as a result of additional development along such roadway segments." It is believed that the City's concurrency requirements (Policy 1.1.3.3) are satisfied based upon the following: The two lane section of South Bayshore Drive is less than one mile in length. The section of SW 17th Avenue from South Bayshore Drive to US -1 is less than one mile in length. The additional traffic associate with the project has a negligible impact on existing and future levels of service. Further given the nature of the two roadway segments under consideration, it would appear reasonable to establish them as constrained roadways. subm, itted 100 tho puhlio rocord in i,onrwx,Jon with itorn �'� • or, ff! t.s,7�0( Wilier Foornan .� r City Glortc public itom E ROYAL SAY ESTATES SITE UTILITY STUDY I. DRAINAGE A. Drainage Area 0 The site is located on South Bayshore Drive, east of Southwest 17`h Avenue. It has approximately 135 feet of frontage on South Bayshore Drive and Micanopi Avenue. It consists of a total of 1.08 acres. The development consists on the construction of six single family houses, with associated driveways and entrance ways. After development, approximately 85% of the property will be impervious areas and approximately 15% of the site will remain as pervious areas. The storm water discharge will consist primarily of building roofs, driveways and landscape areas run-off. The coefficient of run-off is arrived at as follows; 0.85 (impervious) x 0.90 = 0.765 +0.15 (pervious) x 0.30 - 0.045 overall coefficient 0.810 B. Existing Drainage System The City of Miami presently maintains a roadway drainage system in all fronting streets. The existing roadway system appears to be of sufficient capacity to handle the present conditions. C. Proposed Drainage System The primary drainage system of this development will consist of a system of exfiltration trench and/or infiltration wells which will allow the stormwater runoff to be fully contained on-site. No off-site runoff is anticipated from this building. The determination of the use of either or both systems, and the exact extend of them will be determined after the geotechnical investigations are performed. The stormwater will be collected through a system of catch basin inlets and transported by pipes to the runoff disposal system. Runoff from driving surfaces such as driveways and parking areas will be pre-treated in order to capture the oils and greases prior to flowing into the ground water. Page 1 3r b -bitted into tho public rocofd in conince!!on with ciiy Clerk Am 0 Table 1 Sample Drainage Calculations Runoff Generations 1, Total Area a. Impervious In. Pervious 2. Average Runoff Coefficient 3. Design Storm 4. Time of Concentration S. Rainfall Intensity 6. Peak Runoff (Q) - C;A 1.08 Acres 85% or 0.92 Acres 15% or 0.16 Acres (.85) (.9) + (.15) (.3) = 0.81 5 years 10.00 min 6.10 in/hr (.81) (6.10) (1.08) = 5.34 CFS Assuming the use of drainage weill with an average flow of 760 gpm per foot of head - using 2 feet of head: 2 x 750 gpm = 1,500 gpm per well 1,500 gpm = 3.34 CFS (Peak runoff) 5.34 CFS = 1.60 Wells (Flow per well) 3.34 CFS Provide 2 - 24" diameter wells Detention Tank: Providing 11/s minute detention time of storage in tank. Volume of tank required to handle 1,500 gpm for 1.5 min. 1,500 gpm x 1.5 min = 2,250 gal/tank or 300 ft' each Provide 2 tanks each with the following interior dimensions: 5' (width) x 5' (height) x 12' (length) = 300 ft3 Provide 2 tanks with 300 ft' volume each. Assuming the use of exfiltration trenches with an estimated exfiltration rate of 0.10 cfs / if of trench: L= Qpeak = 5.34 = 53.4 If ( "trench 0.10 Page 2 8LIbmiife(.1 into the public rdcorcl in cOr'nec tion tvith or) V,:,MW L Waitor Foenlaf CRY Ilett, s{ i Provide minimum 60 If of exfiltration trench. Il. WATER DISTRIBUTION The Miami Dade Water and Sewer Department owns and operates one 24" and one 6" water mains located on South gayshore Drive. The water connections to serve the buildings will be done from the 24 inch main. The connections will consist of domestic water and irrigation water. No on-site wells are planned for this project. The calculations for anticipated water volumes required for this project are shown below, in Table 2. Table 2 Water Volumes Single Family Homes 6 units @ 350gpd/unit ............................... 2,100 gpd Total flow demand ........................................ 2,100 gpd III. SANITARY SEWER The Miami Dade Water and Sewer Department owns and operates a 10" gravity sewer main along South 8ayshore Drive and an 8"sewer main along Micanopi Avenue. It is anticipated that a single gravity connection to one of the gravity lines will be sufficient to serve this project. No pump station will be built on-site to serve the project. Table 3, below, shows the anticipated sewage flow calculations. Table 3 Sewage Flows Average Flow (from Table 2) .............................. 2,100 gpd Average Flow ............................................. 8 gpm Peak Flow (8 x 3.5) ........................................ 28 gpm IV. SOLID WASTE GENERATION Page 3 Submitted into tho Public record it, c_;}nrr;;(:1,.l0u t,iih Submitiod 'W-o 9m, Public record in ol ;—,- - -;� un with AMh on 114&�.AL City Glork a Lambert Advisory 0 ECONOMIC IMPACT ANALYSIS ROYAL BAY ESTATES (Luxury Single Family Residences) - Prepared by - Lambert Advisory, LLC - Prepared for - The Royal Bay Group, Inc. 0 January 3.1, 2001 Submittod Info tho public rocord in ctjmn eolion with item on Ufrlr-7 1 ( Y / Ally Clerk Economic Impact Analysis — Royal Bay Estates Economic Impact Analysis Coconut Grove Luxury Villas Lambert Advisory has completed an Economic Impact Analysis for the development of the Royal Bay Estates (Phase I), a luxury single family residential development located between South Bayshore Drive and Micanopy Avenue, in the City of Miami. The analysis contemplates the tangible direct and indirect economic impact that will be derived from the construction and operation of the residences. The objective is to identify various benefits created by the Royal Bay development and prepare an estimate of such benefits to the City of Miami. The luxury villas are situated within Coconut Grove and approximately two miles from Miami's central business district. The residential villas will have a positive impact on the surrounding community in terms of taxes, jobs generated and general investment. In turn, this has the potential to help the area maintain economic stability and, if successful, attract on-going investment during the next several years. We have completed this analysis on the basis that the performance of the project in terms of sale price, sale pace, timing, and costs will be as provided by the Royal Bay Group. As such, we have not independently verified this information or data. A profile of the project is as follows: Royal Bay Group - Royal Bay Estates Property Features & Profile General Features Total land Area 1.2 acres Number of Homes 6 Average lot Size 7,875 sq.ft. Average Home Size 4,070 sq.ft. Total Sq.Ft. Building Area (All Homes) 24,420 sq.ft, Note: Information based upon estimates from a Preliminary Site Plan provided by representatives of Royal Bay Group. Development of the Royal Bay Estates (Phase I) is expected to commence construction March 2001. The construction process is anticipated to be 24 months, and occupancy is planned for March 2003. UtE€ rrdltod Into the publlr; racord in costrtcctlon with item Paroto waltor I-001rdon 2 C€ty Glom s11 Economic Impact Analysis — Royal Bay Estates Based upon the information provided, construction and subsequent occupancy of the Royal Bay Estates will generate certain benefits to both the immediate area and the metro -Miami community. There are four key areas where the project will provide positive economic benefit: • Short-term construction employment and expenditure • On-going impact from resident expenditure • Impact from ad valorem taxes • Indirect secondary and tertiary flow through benefits For both short-term and long-term impacts, which are detailed in the following analysis, the economic benefit to the area is the result of projected increase in revenue from primary sources including employment, wages, and taxes. Accordingly, the impact from these key sources come from two distinct measures: 1.) Direct Expenditures — include disbursements for site acquisition and development (hard and soft costs); and, 2.) Indirect Expenditures — net additional expenditures that flow into the local economy as a result of the new development. We have made an attempt to quantify the tangible impacts from direct and indirect expenditures. However, potential intangible impacts such as the project's ability to serve as a catalyst for future development in immediate area is not included in the analysis since it is almost impossible to capture these ethereal aspects of the project in numbers. The following analysis sets forth the economic impact the four key sources as follows: Impact from Short -Terre Construction Employment and Expenditure The impact from short-term construction employment and expenditure is directly associated with the project's development; the following table details estimated development costs (rounded): Development Costs Royal Bay Estates Item _ Cost Hard Costs 1 $ 2.473.200 Taxes/Impact Fees $ 14,000 Other $ 1,088,716 Total $ 4,391,038 f3ubmitt,0d into tho public r,ccord in conn; ration with on 3 tt aitcr 1-00 all Gil�r �;i irk 11 Economic Impact Analysis — Royal Bay Estates While the vast majority of expenditure of each of these items will be made within Miami - Dade County, the City of Miami will capture a significant share of the outflow from development. Of hard costs, approximately 60 percent ($1.48 million) will be spent in labor and 40 percent ($990,000) in materials. Over an estimated 24 month construction period at an average annual construction wage of $34,336 in Miami -Dade County' and a 1.4 times benefit/overhead multiplier per worker, there will be nearly 15 Full Time Equivalent (FTE) jobs created over the period. Additionally, it is assumed that approximately $815,000 million will be spent in professional fees entirely to Miami area firms. Given an average profit margin of 15% and 30% overhead for these firms, this equates to $450,000 in total professional wages. Taxes to the City and County during the construction period will be approximately $14,000 which will be available public expenditures associated with the project including developmental, administrative, permitting, schools, and other costs. On -Going Impact from Resident Expenditure Based upon the prospective buyer profile for the development, Royal Bay Estate's owner base is expected to primarily be affluent professionals and/or empty nesters. Considering the proposed average sale price of approximately $1.35 million, the buyers will be exclusively high income individual/households with a median household income of at least $400,000. Therefore, with a total of 6 residences, total personal income for building is estimated to exceed $2,4 million. Assuming 50 percent of the owners will be new residents to the City, the marginal added personal income to flow into the Miami area is on the order of $1.2 million. To measure the marginal impact of $1.2 million in annual household income on retail sales and additional space demanded, we have used the Lambert Advisory Retail Trade Model to develop estimates, The full model is included as an Attachment to this report, but the following table highlights additional retail expenditure and demand for space as a result of development of the rental units in the development by 2003. ! State of Florida 1999 ES -202 Submitted into the public record in conne(,.i,qn with item P_Z-A on 4 wo lim hmi non 0".v Clerlc E C 11 Economic Impact Analysis - Royal Bay Estates Royal Bay Estates Area Expenditure Potential (From Net New Miami - Royal Bay Residents) 2003 Type of Good Estimated Marginal Growth - Royal Bay Expenditure (2003) Sales per Square Foot Square Feet Demanded Shoppers Goods Sub -Total $147,228 $.177 83.1 Convenience Goods Sub -Total .$191,176 $324 590 Total $338,404 $274 1,672 Source: Dollars & Cents of Shopping Centers (1997) Impact from Real Estate Taxes The Royal Bay Estates will provide significant benefit to the City and County by way of real property and personal property (ad valorem) taxes. The tax amount is based upon the County Tax Collector's (2000) millage rate of 27.442 (per thousand dollars of value), broken down as follows: Royal Bay Estates Economic Impact Analysis Ad Valorem Tax Breakdown Annual Item Mllla a Tax City of Miami Operating 8.995 $56,129 City of Miami Debt 1.280 $7,987 School Operations 8.702 $54,300 School Debt 0.915 $5,710 Environmental Projects 0.100 $624 S, Florida Water Management 0.597 $3,725 FIND 0.041 $256 County Millage 5.609 $36,248 County Debt 0.652 $4,068 Library 0.351 $2,190 TOTAL 27.442 $1715238 source: Dade County Tax Collector Real property is typically assessed at between 70 and 80 percent of Fair Market Value. For this analysis, we estimate ad valorem taxes for Royal Bay Estates based upon 80 percent of the estimated average sale price per home of $1.3 million. Therefore, the real property taxes that will be generated annually from the property should exceed $171,000. Subrnittod Into tho public record in Qonnoction with itein _Z' . oil 00 n-6/ 5 Walter Foonican City clolk a: = 1.231 Economic Impact Analysis — Royal Bay Estates 0 Indirect Flow -Through Benefits There will be some long term indirect flow through benefits beyond construction from the project, primarily from the increase in retail and operations employment. Employment from on-going maintenance of the residences, as well as additional retail employment created from the development is expected to add an additional one to two jobs from the multiplier impact. All multipliers are derived from the U.S. Department of Commerce's 1999 RIMS II model. These are indirect secondary and tertiary impacts which are created as the ripple impact of the primary employment related to the operation of the building and new retail space which will be felt throughout the region. Summary Economic Impacts from Royal Bay Estates Short Term Construction Employment & Expenditure Impact Full Time Jobs Created 15 Total Direct Wages Created $1,480,000 Additional Professional Wages (Miami -Dade County) $450,000 Total Impact from Short Term Const. Employment & Expend. $1,930,000 Impact from On -Going Tenant and Shopper Expenditure Impact Marginal Expenditure Growth — Residents (2003) $1,200,000 Marginal Impact from On -Going Tenant and Shopper Expend. $1,200,000 Impact from On -Going Real Estate Taxes Impact Ad Valorem Taxes (Year 1) $171,000 Total Impact from On -Going Operations of the Building/Retail $171,000 Indirect Flow Through Benefits — Employment Impact Full Time Jobs (Indirect) -- Miami Dade County 2 Total Indirect Wages Created $66,056 Total Flow Through Indirect Benefits $66,056 Based upon the analysis set forth herein, the Royal Bay Estates will have a positive economic impact on both the City of Miami and Miami -Dade County. Total employment created during the development phase is approximately 15, with on-going annual employment of two full-time jobs. Accordingly, there is a $2.0± million impact from short term construction employment and expenditures, and a $171,000 annual revenue stream from real estate taxes. >ul�n�it4nci ir�Yc� t�s� pt�blf[: rocord In co, nec ioll with On t,V111.or i uwfi� n 6 Cii i C;lor'k El Economic Impact Analysis --- Royal Bay Estates LAMBERT ADVISORY RETAIL TRADE MODEL SubrolUe l i:; i,io public rocord hi with iwn -rte _ ctl lk-K _Ql—, Mifiai i-oernan Vi,'v Ciwrl( 0 ':D C ZY Lambert Advisory LLC RESIDENT EXPENDITURES FORECAST, BY MAJOR CATEGORY, ROYAL BAY ESTATES, MIAMI, FL 2001 -2005 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 TOTAL PERSONAL INCOME $1,236.0D0 $1,273,080 $1,311,272 $1,350,611 $1,391,129 TOTAL RETAIL EXPENDITURES $519,120 $534,694 $550,734 $567,256 $584,274 %OFT.P_I. 4200°% 42.00% 42.00% 42.00°% 42.00% VOLUME: SHOPPER GOODS $155.736 $160,408 $165,220 $170,177 $175,262 CONVENIENCE GOODS $207,648 $213,877 $220.294 $226,903 $233,710 OTHER RETAIL $155,736 $160,408 $165,220 $170,177 $175,282 TOTAL RETAIL $519,120 $534,694 $550,734 $567,256 $584.274 PERCENT DISTRIBUTION: SHOPPER GOODS 30.00% 30.00% 30.00% 30.00% 30.00% CONVENIENCE GOODS 40.00°% 40.00% 40.009A 40.00°% 40.DD% OTHER RETAIL 30.00% 30.00% 30.00% 30.00°% 30.00°% TOTAL RETAIL 100.OD°% 100.00% 10000% 100.00% 100.00% 0 ':D C ZY Lambert Advisory LLC RESIDENT DCPENDITURE POTENTIAL BY STORE TYPE, ROYAL BAY ESTATES, MIAMI FLORIDA 2001 - 2005 n 0 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 EXPENDITURES BY STORE TYPE: TOTAL $519,120 $534,694 $550,734 $567,256 $584,274 GENERAL MERCHANDISE $60,218 $62,024 $63,865 $65,802 $67,776 DEPTSTORE $50,874 $52,400 $53,972 $55,591 $57,259 VARIETY STORE $2,076 $2,139 $2,203 $2,269 $2,337 MISC GEN MDSE $7,268 $7,486 $7,710 $7,942 $8,180 APPAREL & ACCESSORIES $26,216 $27,002 $27,812 $28,646 $29,506 MENS & BOYS CLOTHING $3,115 $3,206 $3,304 $3,404 $3,506 WOMENS READY TO WEAR $10,019 $10,320 $10,629 $10.948 $11.276 OTHER WOMENS CLOTHING $1,036 $1,069 $1,101 $1,135 $1,169 FAMILY CLOTHING $6,904 $7,111 $7,325 $7,545 $7,771 SHOES $4,153 $4,278 $4,406 $4,538 $4,674 OTHER APPAREL NEC $986 $1,016 $1,046 $1,078 $1,110 FURNITURE & HOME EQUIPMENT $25,437 $26,200 $26,986 $27,796 $28,629 FURNITURE STORES $8,462 $8,716 $8,977 $9,246 $9,524 HOME FURNISHINGS $4,361 $4,491 $4,626 $4,765 $4,906 HOUSEHOLD APPLIANCES 52,855 $2,941 $3,()29 $3,120 $3214 RADIO &TV $7,683 $7,913 $8,151 $8,395 $6,647 MUSIC STORES $2,076 $2,139 $2,203 $2,269 $2,337 HARDWARE $3,693 $4,010 $4,131 $4,254 $4,382 MISCELLANEOUS S -G $23,369 $24,061 $24,763 $25,527 $26292 USED MERCHANDISE $i,BB9 $1,925 $1,983 $2,042 $2,103 SPORTING GOODS, BICYCLE $2,959 $3,048 $3,139 $3,233 $3,330 BOOK STORES $1,454 $1,497 $1,542 $1,586 $1,636 STATIONARY STORES $519 $535 $551 $567 $584 w -scn Ca JEWELRY STORES $3,530 $3,636 $3,745 $3,857 $3,973 l` HOBBY, TOYS, GAMES $1,557 $1,604 $1,652 $1,702 $1,753 CAMERA, PHOTO SUPPLIES $1,038 $1,069 $1,101 $1,135 $1.169 GIFT, NOVEL'I'ZES $2,025 $2,085 52,148 $2,212 $2279 LUGGAGE, LEATHER $203 $214 $220 $227 $234 SEWING, NEEDLEWORK $1,036 $1,069 $1,101 $1,135 $1,169 FLORIST $1,557 $1,604 $1,652 $1,702 $1,753 • -- �; J Q¢ CIGAR STORES $203 $214 $220 $227 $234 r.•. 0 NEWS DEALERS $208 $214 $220 $227 $234 MISC NEC $5,191 $5,347 $5,507 $5,673 $5,843 SHOPPER GOODSJSUSTOTAL $139,124 $143,298 $147,597 $152,025 $156,585 '7 ` '5 r Lambert Advisory LLC n 0 n 0 WDENT EXPENDITURE POTENTIAL BY STORE TYPE, ROYAL BAY ESTATES, MIAMI FLORIDA 2001 - 2005 (CONTINUED) 2OD1 2002 2003 2064 2005 FOOD STORES $106,679 $109,880 $113,176 $116,571 $120,068 GROCERYSTORES $140,450 $103,463 $106,567 $169,764 $113,057 RETAIL BAKERIES $1,557 $1,604 $1,652 $1,702 $1,753 OTHER FOODS NEC $4,672 $4,612 $4,957 $5,105 $5,258 EATING & DRINKING ESTABLISHMENTS $49,939 $51,438 $52,931 $54,570 $56,207 RESTAURANT, LUNCH, CAFETERIA $27,093 $27,911 $28,748 S29,611 $30,499 FAST FOOD $18,325 $16,675 $19,441 $20,024 620,625 OTHER EATING PLACES NEC $52 553 $55 $57 $5B DRINKING PLACES $4,464 $4,598 $4,736 $4,678 $5,025 DRUG $17,339 $17,859 $18,395 $18,946 $19,515 LIQUOR $6,697 $6,898 $7,104 $7,318 $7,537 CONVENIENCE GOODSISUBTOTAL Y $180,654 $186,073 v $191,656 $197,405 $203,327 AUTOMOTIVE DEALERS $118,359 $121,910 $125,567 $129,334 $133,215 MOTOR VEHICLES,MISC $109,015 $112,286 $115,654 $119,124 $122,698 AUTO & HOME SUPPLY $9.344 $9,624 $9,913 $10,211 $10,517 GASOLINE STATIONS $38,00D $39,140 $40.314 $41,523 $42,769 BUILDING MATERIALS $27,410 $28,232 $29,079 $29,951 $30,850 BLDG,MAT,PAINTETC 523,257 $23,954 $24,673 $25,413 $26,175 NURSERIES, MOBILE HOMES $415 $428 $441 $454 $467 NON STORE RETAILERS $9,344 $9,624 $9,913 $10,211 $10,517 FUEL & ICE DEALERS Wm $6,416 $6,649 $6,807 $7,011 �.,, .. OTHER RETAILISUBTOTAL $199,342 $205,322 $211,482 $217,826 -_ $224,361 �. GENERAL MERCHANDISE $69,218 $62,024 $63,885 $65,802 $67,776 Q APPAREL&ACCESSORIES $26,216 $27,002 $27,812 $28.646 $29,506 ' FURNITURE & HOME EQUIPMENT $25,437 $26,200 $26,986 $27,796 $28.629 MISCELLANEOUS S -G $23,360 $24,051 $24,763 $25,527 $26,292 ;7 SHOPPER GOODSISUBTOTAL $139,124 $143,298 $147,597 $152,025 $156,585 FOOD STORES $106,679 $109,880 $113,176 $116,571 $120,068 C �> EATING & DRINKING ESTABLISHMENTS $49,939 $51,436 $52,931 $54,570 $56,207 :5 CONVENIENCE GOODSISUBTOTAL $180,654 $186,073 $191,656 $197,405 $203,327 t2 O 1 AUTOMOTIVE DEALERS $118,359 $121,910 $125,567 $129,334 $133,215 '-> BUILDlNGMATERIALS $23,672 $24,382 $25,113 $$25,867$26,643 0 w OTHER RETAILISUBTOTAL $199,342 $205,322 $211,482 $2i 7,828 $224,361 TOTAL $519,120 $534,694 $556,734 $567,256 $584,274 Lamben AdvbM LLC n 0 0 CB 0 J r. 1 0 1� 73 Z3 La betl Advisory LLC RESIDENT EXPENDITURE POTENTL4L GENERAL MERCHANDISE APPAREL & ACCESSORIES FURNITURE & HOME EQUIPMENT HARDWARE MISCELLANEOUS S -G SHOPPER GOODSISUBTOTAL FOOD STORES EATING & DRINKING ESTABLISHMENTS DRUG LIQUOR CONVENIENCE GOODS/SUBTOTAL BADE COUNTY RETENTION GENERAL MERCHANDISE APPAREL & ACCESSORIES FURNITURE & HOME EQUIPMENT HARDWARE MISCELLANEOUS S -G FOOD STORES EATING & DRINKING ESTABLISHMENTS DRUG LIQUOR PERCENT SALES INFLOW FROM RESIDENT VISITORS GENERAL MERCHANDISE APPAREL &ACCESSORIES FURNITURE & HOME EQUIPMENT HARDWARE MISCELLANEOUS S -G FOOD STORES EATING & DRINKING ESTABLISHMENTS DRUG LIQUOR 95.00% RETENTION AND SALES INFLOW FACTORS 95.00% 95.OD% BY STORE TYPE, ROYAL BAY ESTATES, MIAMI FLORIDA 2001 - 2005 95.00% 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 $60.218 $62,024 $63,885 $65,802 $67,776 $26,216 $27,002 $27,812 $28,646 $29,506 $25,437 $26,200 $26,986 $27,796 $28,629 $3,893 $4,010 $4,131 $4,254 $4,382 $23.360 $24,061 $24,783 $25,527 $26,292 $139,124 $143,296 $147,597 $152,025 $158,585 $106,679 $109,880 $113,176 $116.571 $120,066 $49,939 $51,438 $52,981 $54,570 $56,207 $17,339 $17,659 $18,395 $18.946 $19,515 $6,697 $6,898 $7,104 $7,318 $7,537 $186,654 $186,073 $191,655 $197,405 $203,327 95.00% 95.00% 95.00% 95.OD% 95-00°/. 95.00% 95.00% 95-00% 95.00% 95.00/. 95.00% 95.00% 95.00% 95.00% 95.00% 95.00% 95,00% 95.00% 95.00% 95.00% 95.00% 95.00% 95-00% 95.00% 95-00% 95.00% 95.00% 95.00% 95.00% 95.00% 95.00% 95.00% 95.00% 95.00% 95.00% 95.00% 95.00% 95.00% 95.00% 95.00% 95.00% 95.00% 95.00% 95.00% 95.00% 5.00% S.OD% 5.00% 6.00% 5.00% 5-00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5-00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.OD% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.DD% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.001' S.OD% 5.00% 5.001/. 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 0 • • s Lambe.i Adv6nry LLC RETENTION AND SALES INFLOW FACTORS BY STORE TYPE, ROYAL BAY ESTATES, MIAMI FLORIDA 2001 - 2005 (CONTINUED) TOTAL SALES POTENTIAL 2001 2002 2003 2004 20D5 $60,067 $61,869 $63,725 $65,637 $67,606 GENERAL MERCHANDISE APPAREL&ACCESSORIES $26,150 $26,935 $27,743 $28,575 $29,432 FURNITURE & HOME EQUIPMENT $25,373 $26,134 $26.919 $27,726 $28,558 HARDWARE $3,884 $4,000 $4,120 $4,244 $4,371 MISCELLANEOUS S -G $23,302 $24,001 $24,721 $25,463 $26,227 SHOPPER GOODSISUBTOTAL $138,776 $142,940 $147,228 $151,645 $156,194 FOOD STORES $105,412 $109,605 $112,693 5116,280 $119,768 EATING & DRINKING ESTABLISHMENTS $49,814 $51,369 $52,846 $54,434 $56,067 DRUG $17,295 $17,814 $18,349 $16,899 $19,466 LIQUOR $6,680 $6,860 $7,087 $7,299 $7,518 CONVENIENCE GOODS/SUBTOTAL $160,202 $185,606 $191,176 $196,912 $202,819 BUILDING MATERIALS $27,341 $28,161 $29,006 $29,876 $30,773 Lambe.i Adv6nry LLC Lambert Advisory LLC TOTAL SALES POTENTIAL. GENERAL MERCHANDISE APPAREL & ACCESSORIES FURNITURE & HOME EQUIPMENT HARDWARE MISCELLANEOUS S -G SHOPPER GOODSISUBTOTAL FOOD STORES EATING & DRINKING ESTABLISHMENTS DRUG LIQUOR CONVENIENCE GOODSISUBTOTAL TOTAL SALES POTENTIAL SALES PER SQUARE FOOT: GENERAL MERCHANDISE APPAREL & ACCESSORIES FURNITURE & HOME EQUIPMENT HARDWARE MISCELLANEOUS SHOPPER GOODS SHOPPER GOODS/SUBTOTAL FOOD STORES EATING & DRINKING ESTABLISHMENTS DRUG LIQUOR CONVENIENCE GOODSISUBTOTAL AVERAGE WARRANTED SQUARE FEET: GENERAL MERCHANDISE APPAREL & ACCESSORIES FURNITURE & HOME EQUIPMENT HARDWARE MISCELLANEOUS SHOPPER GOODS SHOPPER GOODSISUBTOTAL FOOD STORES EATING & DRINKING ESTABLISHMENTS DRUG LIQUOR CONVENIENCE GOODSISUBTOTAL El 0 0 WARRANTED SPACE BY STORE GROUP 6Y STORE TYPE, ROYAL BAY ESTATES, MIAMI FLORIDA 2001 - 2005 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 $60,067 $61.869 $63,725 $65,637 $67,606 $26,150 $26,935 $27,743 $28,575 $29,432 $25,373 $26,134 $26,919 $27,726 $28,558 S3,884 $4,000 $4,120 $4,244 $4,371 $23,302 $24,009 $24,721 $25,463 $26,227 $138,776== $142,940--- $147,228----- $151,645------ $156,194'~ $106,412 $109,605 $112,893 $116,280 $119,768 $49,614 $51,309 $52,848 $54,434 $56,067 $17,295 317,614 $18,349 $18,899 $19,465 $6,680 $6,880 $7,087 $7,299 $7,518 --$180,202 $185,608 $191,176 ---- $196,912 --- $202,819 $318,978 = $328,548------ 3338,404 $348,556 ------$359,013 $173 $173 $173 $173 $173 $230 $230 $230 $230 $230 $285 $285 $265 $285 $285 $98 598 $98 $98 $98 $m $120 $. $120 $120 $177 $177 $177 $177 $177 $405 $405 $405 $405 $405 $252 $252 $252 $252 $252 $263 $263 $263 $263 $263 sm C $m ME Em $324 $324 $324 $324 $324 $238 $238 $238 $238 $236 347 358 368 379 391 114 117 121 124 128 89 92 94 97 100 40 41 42 43 45 194 200 20S 212 219 784 ------ - - 807 -� 631 -------- 856 - 882 263 271 279 287 296 198 204 210 216 222 66 68 70 72 74 30 31 31 32 33 --- 556 ------- 573 ------------------ 590 607 626 El 0 Lambert Advisory LLC CD 0 WARRANTED SPACE BY STORE GROUP BY STORE TYPE, ROYAL RAY ESTATES, MIAMI FLORIDA 2001 - 2005 (CONTINUED) i > � n � u 2001 2002 2003 20D4 2005 TOTAL WARRANTED RETAIL SPACE 1,340 1,360 1,421 1,464 1,508 NON -RETAIL SPACE 236 243 251 256 266 PERCENT 15.00% 15.00% 15.00°% 15.00% 15.00% TOTAL 1,576 1,623 1,672 1,722 1,774 Lambert Advisory LLC CD 0 •rn � i > � n � u Lambert Advisory LLC SLjbnnllUo-,,-1 i;-�, �-, ptiblic recor(I in ;-I ""Vith Rota fi-IS-61 f oc,Iia fl f� J NMI I II I�� �j� hvt). Rcl3oak S1<E) y ® 0.c12 YAC Bwt fl2+s) o �.. ��� I •S l • r^ \ \\���� Jj I ;l VW f 3 5 -=;���;� �'n��o°°fie . • ` ! _ °�®,.� � 'F�--°.—� � `T' IL --A zR 25' 0�� mt ss.ak,.__.s� ^•-'_ I p aor b. aic Era sx) SI A PLAN OF SURVEY Fcr Ttie 2oycsi Bay Group, lilt. C'° LOCATONFMAP LEGAL DESCRIPTION Bz. c, vaaa m. a:ne a,� aa<- of Mk.,�xae co<rv. F��w� SURVEYOR'S NOTES r�m�v�"m,aa er ear. w D Cefnc.+bnbaW baa carncTbn cimme.Zwv�,Ecsemen.. _ uFeewnorF snbcnCa �:IOT]M[Z'F.il.ra 31 Owrx>Mwp t xcF . b CpHa� of T1:W. - d) Tyva ofSsay. 30UNOhPY s va�>,c ol�c«�iy..--��a„�m,�na cF� �n�bc>a sae oaaa,rrr» 61 tn.,-�1.mcalCentYCTCn of l,.�ies meet o4becR )o :'re IXopery `.e,e twi.we.'ea each !uwavo..m. 8) i1a?lAN OF Al�/EV. be been �aAcaa b:fa e�c4ae ue at'ha er^31as nciea itrerem.11» CaTdeote Coes nCi ex:ixq Y txN _vr�eneC ecnY p) T.ro wG'.eC a<000'Y h kccleC wm.4n a �m+wC He^..rC Nva es CSM1�eG by � recerd wucnce trnvircM,n. Ca-.mrM .tnW wz :30.`OO1B9 Sm' '.^ FonC 1 "%'. Nod DcraC :Mcg 2.1 Wt. 1'.) CP InCkcras ekshq �evUL-nc 1:7 = evCu� ae Ocetl m IvcYmd GeoOeHc Va'�Ica' Jc'un. 1]7 Berx= MaK (U..aC14.M. No. LZ _____..__.._._...—ye'+Cta• 1 Loctiert {/uWAl41 Avenue & S 6AYEliO p tee 0Z- n`v ;IGC reccst� FOR .IF 6EN9iT 1 . oo 1 `� ?1-4ROVAL 34Y GROUP, INC. �,FL GI{;�f :"Ce'Ma.'�� i°O"' m'a'y S...v :IIIIIIIIIIIIIIi MARIO PRATS JR_ 8. ASSOCIATES. INC. �R= aero e JOB NUMBER _o_,,, B 11-478-997 lii rocorde o Itm li A 0 PROJECT CRITERIA - ZONING / SETBACKS / OVERVIEW ��REQRED/ALLO UIWABLE PROVIDED ZONING DISTRICT RI , 5D-18.1, SD -3 BASE F�A.R. .60 .3 NET LOT AREA 47253 SF. (1.05 ACRES) NET LOT' DIMENSIONS 135'-0' X 350'-0)" GRO55 LOT AREA (G -L A) 55,3145 SR (127 ACRES) GREEN SPACE (OI5 x G.L.A.) 8,297 5F. ' -' 24,955 SF. (45%) BUILDING- FOOTPRINT (040 x G --LA) 22126 5F. 9167 5F. (18%) G -R055 FA.R. (0.60 x GLA.) P.U.D. BONUS (020 x GAJ 33,109 S.F. II063 SF. 14884 5F. (30%) OVIDED/. ii/i;.i, RESIDENTIAL USES 3 (5 - 6 BEDROOMS/UNIT) 6 (2 PER UNIT) 6 SPACES • SOUTN 5AY51-40RE DRIVE 70'-0' (FRONT Y [,RD SETFACK) 105'/ I0' • MICANOPY 20'-O' (FRONT YARD SETBACK) 20'-3' MIN. • REAR 20'-0' (REAR YARD SETBACK) NOT APPLICABLE 'INTERIOR SIDES 5'-O' (SIDE YARD SETBACK) 5'-3' TO 6'-4' 'STREET SIDES NOT APPLICABLE NOT APPLICABLE OVERALL BUILDING STRUCTURE (TO TOP OF ROOF SLAB OR AVERAGE SLCPED ROOF) 2S' FROM FLOCD LEVEL OR AVERAGE SIDEWALK ELEVATION, WF-fICHEVER ta.. HIGHER. ROGRAM � GSFJ PROJECT OYERYI W /-, POOL AREA 5,274 SF. PARKING: SURFACE 4126 SF. BUILDING FCOTPRINT AREA 9`,767 SF. OPEN SPACE 24955 SF. CIRCULATION 3128 5F, C -.SF. PROJECT TOTAL 47250 GSF. UNIT MIX S BEDROOMS / 6 BATHROOMS MODELS 'A' s 'B' 2 UNITS (61%) 6 5EDROOr5 / 75 BATHROO 15 -10DEL5 'G I UNIT (33%) -OTAL 3 UNITS (IOO%) H.VRCHL0096-103\SD\0!080?3-U ITS\Sit,�Sk-1Awg,09/0:200104:15207M. 1:459.741 PROJECT CRITERIA - FAR / PROGRAM BREAKDOWN '; r 4 R. BREAKDOWN ,� ROGRAM /, ;,PARKING GROUND FLOOR R�5IDENTIAL 14/5 S.F. &292SF. 9767 G.S.F. 2nd. FLOOR RESIDENTIAL 6592 SF. 6592 G.SF. -OTAL 1,475 S.F. 14,664 SF. 16,359 G -.SF. OVIDED/. ii/i;.i, RESIDENTIAL USES 3 (5 - 6 BEDROOMS/UNIT) 6 (2 PER UNIT) 6 SPACES TOTAL PARKING 6' 6 SPACES reCG�G I� C Kelm PZ- Z 3,Igh e:II vka ee F aemar, r,..I L KI ROYAL BAY E S T A T E S ROYAL BAY GROUP, INC. II10 Hr�ckcll .4 �cn uc Suite 50< fL 3i3i AUGUST30,3001 Qf H:VRCH20096-103\80\0105063-UNIMSR-0- —.dwg, 08/30/2001]0:38:56 AM,12.29945 ROYAL BAY E S T A T E S ROYAL BAY GROUP, INC. II10 Hr�ckcll .4 �cn uc Suite 50< fL 3i3i AUGUST30,3001 0 0 13 _ I PLAN OF SURVEY For The Royal Bay Group, Inc. 0 LOCATION MAP LEGAL DESCRIPTION SURVEYOR'S NOTES o.wer�.`w r �.i e..e,.,,n ne.m - -- ----Sn.�.sm�.,�o• `eou.�. w irv�.w�s ROYAL&4YG up.Wc. K_Jx� i iIIIIVIIIIIIIIIidllllll!I!ill!!li, ago P rs � soc�n"rEs �� // J09 NIINBER El El n I I SITE PLA AND DATA SCHEDULE ;n'o CI pec: GC eee ROYAL BAY ESTATES CONCEPTUAL DES I G N AUGUST 30, 301 11 C.� H:A RCH120056-10,,\SD\010SG6-3-W ITS\Mode: AL K-I.dws, Ggr(I 001 10.38:04 AM, 1:2.+9961 •� �r TN'0 CAR u Y MASTS I y� Y crBEDROOMJ' `CII xnu I u - i FAMILY ROOM 6�iD60M LIVf.4G RbG '.¢�'a.. UNIT'A'- GR011I.'D FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS NET NET AREA (a/c spce i, 100%1. I )OS s.f !, ADIVSTED NET ARFA Iarc spaces@100%-9-1.@50%+lossiaz@'10%)'. 2,323 s.f GROSS AREa (lo0•i..11 zpacal.=105 s.f ' —T SECOND FLOOR PFEA CALCULATIONS NCI NET AREA (dc.pa—C 100•.:): 1,841 s.r ADNSTEDN•ET AREA (arc spacess 6100%+sansc@50%-Io8&a,@TO'/.j. GROSS ARF_4 (100°i..Il.prc..J-1- xf. 1,88>s.f UNIT'A'- TOTAL FLOOR AREA C.4LCULITIONS NU -NET ARE4 (arc —ca 9 1—) 3,—, f .4DIUSTEDNET AREA (Yc -&W% - sansc Qa 50°%- I-,. @ 10%): 4,I H s.I. GROSS AREA (100%411 space): 4,611 s.f 9'G 2 Or ] FIRST FLOOR PLAN - MODE' 'A' 72 SECOND FLOOR PLAN - MODEL'A' 1 t 'l/ Y 1 Y JL! BAY ESTATES [�LE SK -2 CON C E P T U A L DESIGN H:A RCH120056-10,,\SD\010SG6-3-W ITS\Mode: AL K-I.dws, Ggr(I 001 10.38:04 AM, 1:2.+9961 •� �r L C Mill), H:I CH�009&103�D1010806-3-UNITSIModcl-A\SK-2.d,g,08730200110:37:39/.M, 12.29939 KUYAL BAY ESTATES CONCEPTUAL DESIGN E D HzARCHL0096-103U'D�010606-i-UN1TSUfodcl-Bash-�.dwc, 06/)02001 10.i�:14 AM. 1-:995( x Two CAR II L . —T'B'- GROUND Fl00R AREA ULCUL.5T1015 m.e5im n.:•C s�-.. a,.c:.,E zo-_...`n.r UNIT'6SECONDFLOORAREACALCULA-IONS v�G�ar i�.v.G:o.. cc:.,G>vl �.ers..r UNiT 2' - TOTAL FLOOR ARLA CALC—TIONS m��e iv.l. zzzs.t. am&im wv=Eso-. ceW E�vla la.r 0C a. 1FIRST FLOOR PLAN - MODEL B' 2 SECOND FLOOR PLAN - MODEL'B' ROYAL. BAS' ESTATES 0 6. DESIGN ESK-4]CONCEPTUAL AVGVST 30, 2001 HzARCHL0096-103U'D�010606-i-UN1TSUfodcl-Bash-�.dwc, 06/)02001 10.i�:14 AM. 1-:995( L 11 I HIARCN\20096-103\SD\010606-3-UNl]SWodel-BlSK-2.d s.OSf30200110:36:50P ,1:2.29963 cr =cci^cn I mor LivE� vn� of w.c�� � aa Fioorz-{ 9 �-rrxo�rer,- iu.� �Prsrsoreer�- iiu= �EaTY _i.vE� F ^ - .H GOOD> � ®®0 00000 1/ 111 � ❑ �ODG e�ac ne:vxr w.ur_. ' .. /o!,.�. r./ L ./5C4LNa 'g ,2/., FRONLEL'SYATION F>�CTNG.7+G,4NOPY..;A?'ENN«E„370DELiB„,.../f..r.,'�'•<<::,,'r,/y �, if r rr ! -,moi,. -:_. K -m•. a-- ,>-. . 3.r'�:1'%”>'i 1.,r.�.>,>/.- ,...�.✓r i../>!' .. •-//r{ �. �,> / _1.,. rn r.-..:r.,r :,.. 1,t /✓1.. rte,../�/1.>{r. �i,...i,.>F/�,,,�,.-, tr..1,/,xf///i..l�.�,..�r!:��..�..sw,si✓xaLja!°%'0�L1/ri.,'�%�z.�'L�,°j„/7r��:�lli,,'{�rz::.,i�✓iGJ/%��/�i,{',.�,�:z/,%.r�Y,�{/n','�/i�irn�;,T.%%i'�..�,...•� �., .,,;..; �.,: �4n/. �.,-.:v.:w.: �=WCL IJ I.II `I I I.I O LI I.I ll ll ll I r --- ---- -_---_- I ---------- o-n:r'Y -i r� F N x. � � _ _ __ __ I / � - :-3r/ 'FRONTFZ.EUATION FAC3ITG ERNAT'E-DRSCE 'MODEL By -i r r r/iii 1 'i3 -- 5 / ✓ r'� /, ,. i/ ,,, 4;?. iFRONTsELFVAT'ION-- 9'QING.<bIICANOP,St.9UEffiJE, VLODELB - 5G1_.1/✓jX 0_ l., i../I»/ /�.//7� !/.,ir',! .>!r./.2,,./, l..F ,,. .;... . / ; r /� . ,�' r .,or: /, 'r .r 5K5` sc4_, ve �=v r� { i;l/ iY / y 1 R lJ F A. 1 D A Y E S T A T E IJ CONCEPTU A L DESIGNERE SK -5 I HIARCN\20096-103\SD\010606-3-UNl]SWodel-BlSK-2.d s.OSf30200110:36:50P ,1:2.29963 cr =cci^cn E 11 Alk i r I Ch I b - . _ ...- °OTMo ;l�• S ~ r '_ - - O -- C LIBRA — —C ROO — GUEST BEDR00 nwu _ I BEDROO BEDODM v M .O E el=Y �^LL I I II ENTRY ALL I I� I Q i RTICA I4 to � �•,�. Li j I l ty d , KITCHEK DROOM¢ T 0 -CAR aa.nAcc .117{ . .l I11 III���,,, Lol � -Z � %. •'- / .I I —T'C- GROUND FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS wa+E �mwl'?[a al _ w.o E�m w•n Cm. u••6+ox1_uvvi _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ L ----------------------------------.TM C SECOND FLOOR I gREA ULULATIONS cxra� nww xwx ai.�..el I..i —T'C TOTAL FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS waC [..+c6 mx. p.••(+wwl. eaa�..: �xo=:.,�,m...,.a,,._�x.. 4.=E w cxosnunvm. u. �Eiml w nehw•&Nxl [.wl.l •..• `�.11i IAV rr WCCOCC: 01 CC:�r•,�C,°,I^�.. a,- 7 FIRST FLOOR PLAN - MODEL'C' 2 SECOND FLOOR PLAN - MODEL'C' -- - Y �J 1 A L B A Y CONCEPTUAL E S T A T E DESIGN S 0' e SCALE. 110'-1'-0' K o001� H:WRC?110096-10;�D,l10S06-3-1.;�ITSW.del-CLSK-I.wS,OnO3 00110:36:23AM,1:2.299,] 11 El :3:\ARCH120096-]OJ\SD\O10505-J-UNITS\Model-C�SK�2.dwS, OB/30200110:3>:>; AM, I?99?9 —� 1 - f tti i�_ I i t' »�- ✓ r - :1..—�-�i..r,/! r�//.�.r �. .<cc_f-�vS✓, �,; G.,....,.,�._,.�,Y�.!�iym�z�i.�y:>r�7i,!f�/���a�''%/x�iJv.%.7�„'�;(�/%/.?✓l��l.,.if/,3Fr%f%✓�rr'i,.�id','ii?/.�.z r'r y.FN/..rye"'' ,,�": %z �aL`vsY .m•-, :v:. r/ 'I - .t -r r .., - .;'/ -v�..r >; _M r�-%, r ..-..�-.�i,+��...rT_s��.�'/.��/,s%%„ft'.F-�r./rJ�,v„r,. J%//I .....t� m°rr�f fntfl Zhu P11NC on 6e-as�a � �I I TOP a e1.a9 i _ nnn F a _ . REARELEUAT! .NiOD£ - ON .,.. N •:/ ry,-r.� �-Y�r�i';�r- of r; c - 3 r ..-v 'f- G sK� jY�Yd r� .rr"✓!/f/ J '.,✓_, / rr.,. llf r •-� ..r �;.:%� rli . .. r ...,r r..._,. ,,n.. �„rC/r�xr':.rM, v}✓J./,f-9✓ry.,.,�J../t:-./.✓w/1,.�.:<,%.r r�;1/.�,.�./..�.'Y,�✓, -, ..u�.i1,. it .! f,�F:rt. L;ri' ,�,��•r �, .,sic,f xaL.va 4;of�i.� .-:.:, r �/' ! � /�,r, ;.! - -- �'f / R V 1 A B AY E S 1' jj l E S CONCEPTUAL DESIGN A���sr3o :3:\ARCH120096-]OJ\SD\O10505-J-UNITS\Model-C�SK�2.dwS, OB/30200110:3>:>; AM, I?99?9 —� 1 - f tti i�_ 11 II 1 M��0�0�=1��o�a�s���on■���� .nmmm000.a®m®©v©.c��m©oo..��vo__ .am�000v.a�mv©©o.o�m�000..��o-- .om�o©ov.©mmvoml�■ommmoo©.■iso__ .o®® ©oo v� mm avvo.o m.�oo..----m mm.o mm - I 1 .■mmo®oo.o��m�av©■om�moo©oma____ mm ��000r�.v�m�avo■om©o■a■o.■��____ .m��oo©©.ammo®©o.om�mmoo.■�____ .e��©oo©.ammo0vo■o®�mr�0or■■��____ n��®oot■�m®ovo.o®o�vo■.��____ WO om©om©o.a�m®vvo.o�mmomo■.�■____ 0�©0000■■____ .em�000©.o�m®vvo.o�mm©vos■��____ - �em�©omoMa-m©vvo_��m�.■�_m__ [ u a. ase-— fit!' G 6 r� H:' ARCH\ 0096.103SD\010506-3-LN)—,Ma.d,.zp,,gllL ).O.d g,06/30.'200110.39:43AM,122999