Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
R-01-1157
J-01-863 10/05/01 \' �n • i Ire RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE MIAMI CITY COMMISSION, WITH ATTACHMENTS, APPROVING WITH CONDITIONS, A MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT PURSUANT TO ARTICLES 13 AND 17 OF ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 11000, FOR THE BISCAYNE VILLAGE PROJECT, TO BE LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY 311, 323 AND 405 NE 19TH STREET, 304, 331, 334, 340, 354, 357, 362, 365, 367, 372, 375 AND 391 NE 20TH STREET, 322, 340 AND 360 NE 20TH TERRACE, 2010 NORTH BAYSHORE DRIVE AND 1917 AND 2025 BISCAYNE BOULEVARD, MIAMI, FLORIDA, TO BE COMPRISED OF A RESIDENTIAL COMPLEX, WITH NOT MORE THAN 437 UNITS, ACCESSORY RECREATIONAL SPACE, 19,400 SQUARE FEET OF RETAIL USES AND 701 PARKING SPACES; DIRECTING TRANSMITTAL OF THE HEREIN RESOLUTION; MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATING CONCLUSIONS OF LAW; PROVIDING FOR BINDING EFFECT; CONTAINING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, on August 3, 2001, The Finger Biscayne, LLC., (hereinafter referred to as "APPLICANT"), submitted a complete Application for Major Use Special Permit for the Biscayne CITY COMMIS ,ION MEETINC OF 1"ivawlia11on No. 0 0 Village Project (hereinafter referred to as "PROJECT") pursuant to Articles 13 and 17 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, for the properties located at approximately 311, 323 and 405 NE 19th Street, 304, 331, 334, 340, 354, 357, 362, 365, 367, 372, 375 and 391 NE 20th Street, 322, 340 and 360 NE 20th Terrace, 2010 North Bayshore Drive and 1917 and 2025 Biscayne Boulevard, Miami, Florida, as legally described in "Exhibit B" and "Exhibit A", attached and incorporated; and WHEREAS, development of the PROJECT requires the issuance of a Major Use Special Permit pursuant to Article 17 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended; and WHEREAS, the Large Scale Development Committee met on June 27, 2001, to consider the proposed PROJECT and offer its input; and WHEREAS, the APPLICANT has modified the proposed PROJECT to address the expressed technical concerns raised at said Large Scale Development Committee meeting; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Department reviewed the project for design appropriateness throughout the pre-- application phase and, upon modifications in the final design proposal, recommended approval of the final design solution to the Planning and Zoning Director; and WHEREAS, the Miami Planning Advisory Board, at its meeting held on September 19, 2001, Item No. 3, following an advertised public hearing, adopted Resolution No. PAB-81-01 by a vote of eight to one (8-1), RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of the Major Use Special Permit Development Order as attached and incorporated; and WHEREAS, the City Commission deems it advisable and in the best interest of the general welfare of the City of Miami to issue a Major Use Special Permit Development Order as hereinafter set forth; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. The recitals and findings contained in the Preamble to this Resolution are adopted by reference and incorporated as if fully set forth in this Section. Section 2. A Major Use Special Permit Development Order, attached and incorporated as "Exhibit A", is approved Page 3 of 9 0 0 subject to the conditions specified in the Development Order, per Article 17 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, for the PROJECT to be developed by the APPLICANT, at approximately 311, 323 and 405 NE 19th Street, 304, 331, 334, 340, 354, 357, 362, 365, 367, 372, 375 and 391 NE 20th Street, 322, 340 and 360 NE 20th Terrace, 2010 North Bayshore Drive and 1917 and 2025 Biscayne Boulevard, Miami, Florida, more particularly described on "Exhibit B," attached and incorporated. Section 3. The PROJECT is approved as a residential complex consisting of 437 units, with accessory recreational uses, 19,400 square feet of retail uses, and 701 parking spaces. Section 4. The Major Use Special Permit Application for the PROJECT also encompasses the lower ranking Special Permits as set forth in the Development Order ("Exhibit A"). Section 5. The findings of fact set forth below are made with respect to the subject PROJECT: a. The PROJECT is in conformity with the adopted Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000, as amended. b. The PROJECT is in accord with the SD -6 Zoning classifications of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, the Page 4 of 9 " 1'.. Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended. c. Pursuant to Section 1305 of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, the specific site plan aspects of the PROJECT, i.e., ingress and egress, parking, signs and lighting, utilities, drainage, preservation of natural features and control of potentially adverse effects generally, have been considered and will be further considered administratively during the process of issuing a building permit and a certificate of occupancy. d. The PROJECT is expected to cost approximately $97 million, and to employ approximately 165 workers during construction (FTE -Full Time Employees); the PROJECT will also result in the creation of approximately 58 permanent new jobs. The PROJECT will generate approximately $1.7 million annually in tax revenues to local units of government (2001 dollars). e. The City Commission further finds that: (1) the PROJECT will have a favorable impact on the economy of the City; (2) the PROJECT will efficiently use public transportation facilities; Page 5 of 9 (3) any potentially adverse effects of the PROJECT will be mitigated through compliance with the conditions of this Major Use Special Permit; (4) the PROJECT will favorably affect the need for people to find adequate housing reasonably accessible to their places of employment; (5) the PROJECT will efficiently use necessary public facilities; (6) the PROJECT will not negatively impact the environment and natural resources of the City; (7) the PROJECT will not adversely affect living conditions in the neighborhood; (8) the PROJECT will not adversely affect public safety; (9) based on the record presented and evidence presented, the public welfare will be served by the PROJECT; and (10) any potentially adverse effects of the PROJECT arising from safety and security, fire protection and life safety, solid waste, heritage conservation, trees, shoreline development, minority participation and employment, and minority contractor/subcontractor participation Page 6 of 9 will be mitigated through compliance with the conditions of this Major Use Special Permit. Section 6. The Major Use Special permit, as approved and amended, shall be binding upon the APPLICANT and any successors in interest. Section 7. The application for Major Use Special Permit, which was submitted on August 3, 2001, and on file with the Department of Planning and Zoning of the City of Miami, Florida, shall be relied upon generally for administrative interpretations and is incorporated by reference. Section B. The City Manager is directed to instruct the Director of the Department of Planning and Zoning to transmit a copy of this Resolution and attachment to the developers: Vicky Garcia -Toledo, Esq. on behalf of The Finger Biscayne, LLC, 200 South Biscayne Boulevard, Suite 2500, Miami, Fl. 33131. Section 9. The Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law are made with respect to the PROJECT as described in the Development Order ("Exhibit A") for the PROJECT, attached and incorporated. Page 7 of 9 0 • Section 10. The Major Use Special Permit Development Order for the PROJECT ("Exhibit A") is granted and issued. Section 11. In the event that any portion or section of this Resolution or the Development Order ("Exhibit A") is determined to be invalid, illegal, or unconstitutional by a court or agency of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall in no manner affect the remaining portions of this Resolution or Development Order ("Exhibit A"), which shall remain in full force and effect. Section 12. The provisions approved for this Major Use Special Permit, as approved, shall commence and become operative thirty (30) days after the adoption of the herein Resolution. Section 13. This Major Use Special Permit, as approved, shall expire two (2) years from its commencement and operative date. Section 14. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its adoption and signature of the Mayor.'/ 1� If the Mayor does not sign this Resolution, it shall become effective at the end of ten calendar days from the date it was passed and adopted. If the Mayor vetoes this Resolution, it shall become effective immediately upon override of the veto by the City Commission. Page 8 of 9 9 . j 0 PASSED AND ADOPTED this 25th ATTEST: WALTER J. FORMAN CITY CLERK TO ATTO E ; FS 5699WM:dd E day of October 1 2001. JOE CAROLLO, MAYOR ffjo �A,,lyor did not indc-'Ite, approw-1 of ca;"! Cl Mayc)r c, rig, AA, AND CORRECTNESS: Page 9 of 9 Walter J. 0 0 "EXHIBIT A" ATTACHMENT TO RESOLUTION NO. 01 ------- DATE: ----, 2001 BISCAYNE VILLAGE PROJECT MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT DEVELOPMENT ORDER Let it be known that pursuant to Articles 13 and 17 of Ordinance No. 11000, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended (the "Zoning Ordinance"), the Commission of the City of Miami, Florida, has considered in a public hearing, the issuance of a Major Use Special Permit for the Biscayne Village Project (hereinafter referred to as the "PROJECT") to be located at approximately 311, 323 and 405 NE 19th Street, 304, 331, 334, 340, 354, 357, 362, 365, 367, 372, 375 and 391 NE 20th Street, 322, 340 and 360 NE 20th Terrace, 2010 North Bayshore Drive and 1917 and 2025 Biscayne Boulevard, Miami, Florida (see legal description on "Exhibit B", attached and incorporated), is subject to any dedications, limitations, restrictions, reservations or easements of record. After due consideration of the recommendations of the Planning Advisory Board and after due consideration of the consistency of this proposed development with the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan, the City Commission has approved the PROJECT, and subject to the following conditions approves the Major Use Special Permit and issues this Permit: FINDINGS OF FACT PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The proposed PROJECT is a residential/mixed use development to be located at approximately 311, 323 and 405 NE 19th Street, 304, 331, 334, 340, 354, 357, 362, 365, 367, 372, 375 and 391 NE 20th Street, 322, 340 and 360 NE 20th Terrace, 2010 North Bayshor.e Drive and 1917 and 2025 Biscayne Boulevard, Miami, Florida. The PROJECT is located on a gross lot area of approximately 6.504 acres and a net lot area of approximately 4.676 acres of land (more specifically described on "Exhibit B", incorporated herein by reference). The remainder of the PROJECT's Data Sheet is attached and incorporated as "Exhibit C". The proposed PROJECT will consist of a residential complex, with no more than 437 residential units with accessory recreational space, and 19,400 square feet of retail uses. The PROJECT will also provide a total of 701 parking spaces. The ownership, operation and maintenance of common areas and facilities will be by the property owner or (in the case of the property being converted to condominiums) a mandatory Page 2 of 11 __.. 0 n property owner association in perpetuity pursuant to a recorded Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions. The Major Use Special Permit Application for the PROJECT also encompasses the following lower ranking Special Permits: CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 906.6, for active recreational facilities (including swimming pools); CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT to permit staging and parking during construction (to be approved prior to obtaining a building permit from the Department of Planning and Zoning); CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 925.3.8, to allow development/construction/ rental signage; CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 920.1, to allow a construction trailer; CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 6, Section 606.3.1, for development of new construction within the Special District; CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 6, Section 506.3.1, for a temporary construction fence and covered walkway; Page 3 of 11 MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 17 for development of 437 residential units; MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 17 for parking structure of 701 parking spaces; PER CITY CODE, Chapter 36, Construction Equipment, request for waiver from the City Commission of noise ordinance during construction; REQUEST that the following MUSP conditions be required at the time of shell permit instead of at issuance of foundation permit: a. the requirement to record in the Public Records a Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions providing that the ownership, operation and maintenance of all common areas and facilities will be by the property owner or a mandatory property owner association; and b. the requirement to record in the Public Records a unity of title or covenant in lieu of unity of title. Pursuant to Articles 13 and 17 of the Zoning Ordinance, approval of the requested Major Use Special Permit shall be Page 4 of 11 .1 __. 1'_-�� considered sufficient for the subordinate permits requested and referenced above as well as any other special approvals required by the City which may be required to carry out the requested plans. The PROJECT shall be constructed substantially in accordance with plans and design schematics on file prepared by Cohen, Freedman, Encinosa & Assoc., dated August 1, 2001; the landscape plan shall be implemented substantially in accordance with plans and design schematics on file prepared by Bradshaw Gill and Associates, dated July, 2001; said design and landscape plans may be permitted to be modified only to the extent necessary to comply with the conditions for approval imposed herein; all modifications shall be subject to the review and approval of the Director of the Department of Planning and Zoning prior to the issuance of any building permits. The PROJECT conforms to the requirements of the SD -6 Zoning District, as contained in the Zoning Ordinance, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended. The existing comprehensive plan future land use designation on the subject property allows the proposed mix of residential and commercial uses. Page 5 of 11 CONDITIONS THE APPLICANT, ITS SUCCESSORS, AND/OR ASSIGNS, JOINTLY OR SEVERALLY, PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF ANY BUILDING PERMITS, SHALL COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING: 1. Meet all applicable building codes, land development regulations, ordinances and other laws. 2. Pay all applicable fees due prior to the issuance of a building permit. 3. Allow the Miami Police Department to conduct a security survey, at the option of the Department, and to make recommendations concerning security measures and systems; further submit a report to the Department of Planning and Zoning, prior to commencement of construction, demonstrating how the Police Department recommendations, if any, have been incorporated into the PROJECT security and construction plans, or demonstrate to the Director of the Department of Planning and Zoning why such recommendations are impractical. 4. Obtain approval from, or provide a letter from the Department of Fire -Rescue indicating APPLICANT'S coordination with members of the Fire Plan Review Section Page 6 of 11 at the Department of Fire -Rescue in the review of the scope of the PROJECT, owner responsibility, building development process and review procedures, as well as specific requirements for fire protection and life safety systems, exiting, vehicular access and water supply. 5. Obtain approval from, or provide a letter of assurance from the Department of Solid Waste that the PROJECT has addressed all concerns of the said Department prior to the obtainment of a shell permit. 6. Prepare a Minority Participation and Employment Plan (including a Contractor/ Subcontractor Participation Plan) to be submitted to the City's Director of Equal Employment Opportunity for review and comments, with the understanding that the APPLICANT must use its best efforts to follow the provisions of the City's Minority/Women Business Affairs and Procurement Program as a guide. 7. Record the following in the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, prior to the issuance of a shell permit: (a) a Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions providing that the ownership, operation and maintenance of all common areas and facilities will be by the property owner or a mandatory property owner association in perpetuity; (b) a Page 7 of 11 P • 0 certified copy of the Development Order specifying that the Development Order runs with the land and is binding on the APPLICANT, its successors, and assigns, jointly or severally. B. Prior to the issuance of a shell permit, demonstrate to the City that the PROJECT has either: (a) completed its condominium requirements and has been approved for such by the State of Florida; or (b) provide the City with an executed, recordable unity of title or covenant in -lieu of unity of title agreement for the subject property; said agreement shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Attorney's Office. 9. Replatting shall be required. The Department of Public Works shall be provided with plans for proposed sidewalk and swale area improvements for its review and approval prior to the issuance of a building permit. 10. Provide the Department of Planning and Zoning with a temporary parking plan, including an operational plan, which addresses construction employee parking during the construction period, said plan shall include an enforcement plan and shall be subject to the review and approval by the Page 8 of 11 Department of Planning and Zoning prior to the issuance of any building permits and shall be enforced during construction activity. 11. Pursuant to the Departments of Fire -Rescue and General Services Administration, the roof area of the proposed structures shall be made available to the City of Miami for any necessary communications equipment at no charge to the City. 12. If the project is to be developed in phases, the APPLICANT shall submit an interim plan, including a landscape plan, which addresses design details for the land occupying future phases of this PROJECT in the event that the future phases are not developed, said plan shall include a proposed timetable and shall be subject to review and approval by the Director of the Department of Planning and Zoning. THE CITY SHALL: Establish the operative date of this Permit as being thirty (30) days from the date of its issuance; the issuance date shall constitute the commencement of the thirty (30) day period to appeal from the provisions of the Permit. Page 9 of 11 w .Fi- 1. i CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 0 The PROJECT, proposed by the APPLICANT, complies with the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000, is consistent with the orderly development and goals of the City of Miami, and complies with local land development regulations and further, pursuant to Section 1703 of the Zoning Ordinance: (1) the PROJECT will have a favorable impact on the economy of the City; and (2) the PROJECT will efficiently use public transportation facilities; and (3) the PROJECT will favorably affect the need for people to find adequate housing reasonably accessible to their places of employment; and (4) the PROJECT will efficiently use necessary public facilities; and (5) the PROJECT will not negatively impact the environment and natural resources of the City; and (6) the PROJECT will not adversely affect public safety; and Page 10 of 11 „ 0 • (7) the public welfare will be served by the PROJECT; and (8) any potentially adverse effects of the .PROJECT will be mitigated through conditions of this Major Use Special Permit. The proposed development does not unreasonably interfere with the achievement of the objectives of the adopted State Land Development Plan applicable to the City of Miami. Pursuant to Section 1305 of the Zoning Ordinance, the specific site plan aspects of the PROJECT i.e., ingress and egress, offstreet parking and loading, refuse and service areas, signs and lighting, utilities, drainage and control of potentially adverse effects generally have been considered and will be further considered administratively during the process of issuing individual building permits and certificates of occupancy. Page 11 of 11 JJ I�33 i PARCEL I: • "Exhibit B" Folio # 01-3231-003-0030 Lot 2, and the West 15 feet of Lot 1, in Block 1, 114MAIMAR, according to the Plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 5, at Page 4, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida. PARCEL 2: Folio # 01-3231-003-0040!01-3231-003-0050 Lots 3, 4, 5 and that portion of Lot 7 lying East of the East right-of-way line of Biscayne Boulevard, Block 1, MIRAMAR, according to the Plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 5, at Page 4, of the Public Records of Miami. Dade County, Florida. PARCEL 3: Folio # 01-3231-001-0011 Lot 1, CORAL PARK, less the West 161.25 feet thereof, according to the Plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 2, at Page 66, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida. PARCEL 4: Folio # 01-3231-001-0010 The West 161.25 feet of Lot 1, CORAL PARK, according to the Plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 2, at Page 66, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida. PARCEL 5: Folio # 01-3231-001-0020 Lot 2, CORAL PARK, according to the PIat thereof recorded in Plat Book 2, at Page 66, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida. PARCEL 6: Folio # 01-3231-001-0030 The East 50 feet of Lot 3, CORAL PARK, according to the Plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 2, at Page 66, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida. PARCEL 7: Folio # 01-3231-001-0040101-3231-001-0070101-3231-001-0100 Lot 3, less the East 50 feet thereof, Lots 5, 7 and that portion of Lot 11 lying East of the East right-of-way line of Biscayne Boulevard, CORAL PARK, according to the Plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 2, at Page 66, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida. PARCELS: Folio # 01-3231-002-0010 Lots 9A and 9B of a RESUBDNISION OF LOTS 9,15 AND 17 TO 22, INCLUSIVE, OF CORAL PARK, according to the Plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 4, at Page 106, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida. Page 1 of 5 PARCEL 9: Folio # None Available That parcel of land described as follows: Beginning at a point on the South boundary line of Lot 11, CORAL PARK, as recorded in Plat Book 2, at Page 66, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida, where said South line intersects the East boundary line of Biscayne Boulevard, said point being 69.64 feet, more or less, South of the North boundary line of said Lot 11; Thence run Easterly and Southeasterly along the said South boundary line of Lot 11 and the South boundary line of Lots 9B and 9A of a RESUBDIVISION OF LOTS 9,15 AND 17 TO 22, INCLUSIVE, OF CORAL PARK, according to the Plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 4, at Page 106, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida, and along the South boundary line of Lot 7 of aforesaid CORAL PARK, 152.4 feet more or less, to a point 30.9 feet, more or less, Southeasterly from the Southwesterly corner of said Lot 7; Thence run West 148.9 feet, more or less, to the East boundary line of said Biscayne Boulevard; Thence run North along the said East boundary line of Biscayne Boulevard 26.0 feet, more or less, to the POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL 10: Folio # 01-3231-001-0110 The West 52 feet of Lot 8, all of Lot 10, and that portion of Lot 12 lying East of the East right-of-way line of Biscayne Boulevard, CORAL PARK, according to the Plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 2, at Page 66, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida; LESS the following described parcel of land, to -wit: Beginning at the Northeasterly corner of the West 52 feet of Lot 8, CORAL PARK, as recorded in Plat Book 2, at Page 66, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade county, Florida; thence run Northwesterly along the Northerly boundary lines of Lots 8, 10 and 12 of the aforesaid CORAL PARK 147 feet, more or less, to a point on the East boundary line of Biscayne Boulevard; thence run South along: the said East boundary line of Biscayne Boulevard 26.5 feet, more or less, to a point 79.08 feet, more or less, North of the South boundary line of said Lot 12; thence run East, making a deflecting angle of 90000'00" to the left with the said last described course through said Lots 12, 10 and 8, respectively, 144 feet, more or less, to the POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL 11: Folio # 01-3231-001-0050 The West 21 feet and 4 inches of Lot 4 and the East 28 feet and 8 inches of Lot 6, CORAL PARK, according to the Plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 2, at Page 66, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida. PARCEL 12: Folio # 01-33231-001-0060 The East 60 feet of Lot 4, CORAL PARK, according to the Plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 2, at Page 66, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida. Page 2 of 5 PARCEL 13: Folio # 01-3231-001-0090 The West 10 feet of Lot 6 and the East 40 feet of Lot 8, CORAL PARK, according to the Plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 2, at Page 66, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida. PARCEL 14: Folio # 01-3231-001-0080 The East 107.4 feet of Lot 6, less the East 28 feet 8 inches, CORAL PARK, according to the Plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 2, at Page 66, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida. PARCEL 15: Folio # 01-3230-032-0200 The East 100.00 feet of Lots 1 and 2, Block 4, AMENDED PLAT GF BAYSIDE PARK, according to the Plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 2, at Page 40, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida. PARCEL 16: Folio # 01-3230-032-0210 The West 50.00 feet of Lots 1 and 2 and all of Lot 3, Block 4, AMENDED PLAT OF BAYSIDE PARK, according to the Plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 2, at Page 40, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida. PARCEL 17: Folio # 01-3230-032-0230 Lot 6, and the West %2 of Lot 5, in Block 4, AMENDED PLAT OF BAYSIDE PARK, according to the Plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 2, at Page 40, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida. PARCEL 18: Folio # 01-3230-320-0240 Lot 7 and the East % of Lot 8, in Block4, BAYSIDE PARK, according to the Plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 2, at Page 40, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida. PARCEL 19: Folio # 01-3230-032-0270 The West half of Lot 8, all of Lot 9, and Lot 10 LESS that part described as follows: Begin at the Northwest corner of Lot 10, thence run East along the North line of Lot 10 a distance of 1.39 feet to a point; thence Southwesterly to a point on the South line of said Lot 10 located at a distance of 0.44 feet from the Southwest corner of said Lot 10; thence West along the said South Iine to the Southwest corner of said Lot 10; thence North along the West line of said Lot 10 to the POINT OF BEGH*4 NG. All in Block 4, BAYSIDE PARK, according to the Plat thereof, recorded in Plat Book 2, at Page 40, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida Page 3 of 5 -- ALSO KNOWN AS -- PARCEL 1: A parcel of land being Lots 1, 2 and 3 in Block 4 of AMENDED PLAT OF BAYSIDE PARK as recorded in Plat Book 2 at page 40 of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows: BEGIN at the northeast corner of said Lot 2; thence N89°5713011W along the north line of said Lots 2 and 3 for 199.99 feet; thence S00°03'21"W along the west line of said Lot 3 for 104.68 feet; thence S89°59'04"E along the south line of said Lots 3 and 1 for 199.93 feet; thence N00° 05'16"E along the east line of said Lots 1 and 2 for 104.59 feet to the Point of Beginning (containing 0.480 acre more or less). PARCEL 2: A parcel of land being the west one-half (W %:) of Lot 5, all of Lots 6,7,8,9 and a portion of Lot 10 all in Block 4 of AMENDED PLAT OF BAYSIDE PARK as recorded in Plat Book 2 -at page 40 of the Public Records of Miami - Dade County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows: BEGIN at the northeast corner of said west one-half (W %:) of Lot 5; thence N89°57'30"W along north line of said Lots 5,6,7,8,9 and Lot 10 for 273.59 feet to a point on the east right of way line of Biscayne Boulevard as shown on RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION NE 20th ST. BETWEEN NE 2nd AVENUE & BISCAYNE BAY, recorded in Plat Book 75 at page 16; thence S00°30136"W along said east right of way line of Biscayne Boulevard for 104.84 feet; thence S89°59'04"E along the south line of said Block 4 for 274.45 feet; thence N00°02127"E along the east line of said west one-half (W112) of Lot 5 for 104.71 feet to the Point of Beginning (containing 0.659 acre more or less). PARCEL 3: A parcel of land being a portion of Lots 1,3.5,7,11 and a portion of the vacated right-of-way of Coral Drive, all of CORAL PARK as recorded in Plat Book 2 at page 66 of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida and Lots 9A and 98 of RESUBDIVISION OF LOTS 9,15 AND 17 TO 22, INCLUSIVE, OF CORAL PARKas recorded in Plat Book 4 at page 106 of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows: BEGIN at the northeast corner of said Lot 1; thence N89° 59'04"W along the north line of said CORAL PARK and said RESUBDIVISION OF LOTS 9, 15 AND 17 TO 22, INCLUSIVE, OF CORAL. PARK for 593.08 feet; thence S00°30'36"W along the east right-of-way line of Biscayne Boulevard as shown on RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION NE 20th ST. BETWEEN NE 2nd AVENUE & BISCAYNE BAY, recorded in Plat Book 75 at page 16 of Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida for 95.51 feet; the following thirteen (13) courses being along the northerly line of said Plat Book 75 at page 16; (1) thence S89°29'24"E for 148.37 feet; (2) thence S76°35'22"E for 60.90 feet to a point of curvature; (3) thence southeasterly along a 37550 foot radius curve leading to the left through a central angle of 09°42'34" for an are distance of 63.63 feet to a point of compound curvature; (4) thence northeasterly along a 17.70 foot radius curve leading to the left through it central angle of 53°48'06" for on arc distance of 16.62 feet to a point of tangency, (5) thence N39°53°57"E for 21.80 feet to a point of curvature; (6) thence northeasterly along a 63.50 foot radius curve leading to the right through a central angle of 66°48'28" for on are distance of 74.04 feet to a point of tangency, (7) thence S73°17'34"E for 22.91 feet to a point of curvature; (8) thence southeasterly along a 176.01 foot radius curve leading to the Ieft through a central angle of 16°11'50" for and arc distance of 49.76 feet to a point of compound curvature; (9) thence easterly along a 464.00 foot radius curve leading to the left through a central angle of 08°59'59" for on arc distance of 72.88 feet to a point of compound curvature; (10) thence northeasterly along a I43.70 foot radius curve leading to the left through a central angle of 08° 17'05" for on are distance of 20.78 feet to a point of reverse curvature; (11) thence northeasterly along a 143.70 foot radius curve leading to the right through a central angle of 05°46'53" for on are distance of 14.50 feet to a point of compound curvature; (12) thence easterly along a 111.40 foot radius curve leading to the right through a central angle of 22°08'02" for an arc Page 4 of 5 • 1 O distance of 43.03 feet to a point of compound curvature; (13) thence southeasterly along a 37.50 foot radius curve leading to the right through a central angle of 25°15'42" for an arc distance of 16.53 feet; thence N05" 18'5411W along the east line of said Lot 1 for 85.08 feet to the Point of Beginning (containing 1,2113 acres more or less), PARCEL 4 A parcel of land being a portion of Lots 2,4,6,8, 10 and 12 of CORAL PARK as recorded in Plat Book 2 at page 66 of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida and a portion of Lots 1 and 7 along with all of Lots 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 of Block 1 in MIRAMAR as recorded in Plat Book 5 at page 4 of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows: BEGIN at the southeast corner of said Lot 2 of CORAL PARK; thence N89°59'04"W along the south line of said Lot 2 and Lot 4 of CORAL PARK (also being the north line of said Lot 1 in Block 1 of MIRAMAR) for 309.27 feet; thence S00°30'35"W along the east line of the west 15.00 feet of said Lot 1 of Block 1 in MIRANIAR for 104.83 feet; thence S89° 59'36"W along the south line of said Block 1 in MIRAMAR for 305.09 feet, thence N00 °30136"E along the east right-of-way line of Biscayne Boulevard as shown in RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION NE 20th ST. BETWEEN NE 2nd AVENUE & BISCAYNE BAY, as recorded in Plat Book 75 at page 16 of the said Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida, for 184.13 feet; the following twelve (12) courses being along the south line of said RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION NE 20th ST. BETWEEN NE 2nd AVENUE & BISCAYNE BAY, according to the Plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 75 at page 16 of the said Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida; (1) thence S89°29'24"E for 144.53 feet; (2) thence S76°35'22"E for 57.06 feet to a point of curvature; (3) thence southeasterly along a 409.50 foot radius curve leading to the left through a central angle of 09°42'34" for an arc distance of 69.39 feet to a point of compound curvature, (4) thence northeasterly along a 51.70 foot radius curve leading to the left through a central angle of 53°48'06" for on are distance of 48.55 feet to a point of tangency. (5) thence N39°53'57"E for 21.80 feet to a point of curvature; (6) thence northeasterly along a 29.50 foot radius curve leading to the right through a central angle of 66°48'28" for an are distance of 34.40 feet to a point of a tangency, (7) thence S73017'34"E for 22.91 feet to a point of curvature; (8) thence southeasterly along a 210.01 foot radius curve leading to the left through a central angle of 16° 11'50" for an are distance of 59.37 feet to a point of compound curvature; (9) thence easterly along a 498.00 foot radius curve leading to the left through a central angle of 08°59'59" for an are distance of 78.22 feet to a point of reverse curvature; (10) thence southeasterly along a 39.00 foot radius curve leading to the right through a central angle of 59°05'51" for on are distance of 40.23 feet to a point of reverse curvature; (11) thence southeasterly along a 39.00 foot radius curve leading to the left through a central angle of 39°28'00" for an arc distance of 26.86 feet to a point of compound curvature; (12) thence easterly along a 139.00 foot radius curve leading to the left through a central angle of 140 20'08" for on are distance of 34.78 feet; thence S05 ° 18'54"E along the east line of said Lot 2 of CORAL PARK for 59.52 feet to the Point of Beginning (containing 1.807 acres more or less). Page 5 of 5 PROPERTY OWNED *CITY OF MIAMI EXIBIT "A LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A porcel of land being o portion NE 20th Street as shown on the plot entitled RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION, N.E. 20TH STREET BETWEEN N.E. 2ND AVE do BISCAYNE BAY, as recorded in Plat Book 75 at Page 16 of the Public Records of Miomi--Dade County, Florida the some being that portion of N.E. 20th Street lying between Biscayne Boulevard (U.S. Highway #1) and North Boyshore Drive being more porticuroly described as follows: Begin of the N.E. Corner of the intersection of N.E. 20th Street and Biscayne Boulevard as shown on the above said Plot of N.E. 20th STREET, the next 13 courses being along the north line of N.E. 20th Street, (1) thence S89'29'24"E for 148.37 feet, (2) thence 57635'22"E for 60.90 feet to a point of curvature (3) thence southeasterly along a 375.50 foot radius curve leading to the left through a central angle of 09'42'34" for an arc distance of 63.63 feet to a point of compound curvature; (4) thence northeasterly along a 17.70 foot radius curve leading to the left through a central ongle of 53'48'06" for on arc distance of 16.62 feet to o point of tangency; (5) thence N39'53'57"E for 21.80 feet to a point of curvature; (6) thence northeasterly along a 63.50 foot radius curve leading to the right through a central angle of 66'48'28" for on orc distance of 74.04 feet to a point of tangency; (7) thence S73'17'34"E for 22.91 feet to o point of curvature; (8) thence southeasterly along a 176.01 foot radius curve leading to the left through a central ongle of 16'11'50" for and arc distance of 49.76 feet to a point of compound curvature; (9) thence easterly along o 464.00 foot radius curve leading to the left through a central angle of 08'59'59" for on arc distance of 72.88 feet to a point of compound curvature; (10) thence northeasterly along o 143.70 foot radius curve leading to the left through a central angle of 08'17'03" for an arc distance of 20.78 feet to a point of reverse curvature; (1 1) thence northeasterly along a 143.70 foot radius curve leading to the right through a central angle of 05"46'53" for on arc distance of 14.50 feet to o point of compound curvature, (12) thence easterly along o 111.40 foot radius curve leading to the right through a central ongle of 22'08'02" for on arc distance of 43.03 feet to a point of compound curvature; (13) thence southeasterly along a 37.50 foot radius curve leading to the right through o central angle of 25"15'42" for an arc distance of 16.53 feet; thence S05'18'54"E for 65.00 feet to a point on a circular curve whose radius point bears NO3'11'42'W: the next (12) courses being along the south right -of way line of N.E. 20th Street. (1) thence northwesterly along a 139.00 foot radius curve leading to the right through a central ongle of 14"20'08" for arc of 34.78 feet to a point of compound curvature; (2) thence westerly along a 39.00 foot rodius curve leading to the right through o central angle of 39'28'00" for an arc of 26.86 feet to a point of reverse curvature; (3) thence westerly along a 39.00 foot radius curve leading to the left through central angle 59'05'52" for on arc distance 40.23 feet to a point of reverse curvature; (4) thence westerly along a 498.00 foot radius curve leading to the right through a central angle of 08'59'59" for an arc distance of 78.22 feet to a point of compound curvature; (5) thence westerly along a 210.01 foot radius curve leading to the right through central angle of 16'11'50" for on arc distance of 59.37 feet to o point of tangency; (6) thence N73'17'34W for 22.91 feet to a point of curvature; (7)thence southwesterly along a 29.50 foot radius curve leading to the left through a central angle of 66'48'28" for an arc distance of 34.40 feet to a point of tangency; (8) thence S39'53'57'W for 21.80 feet to a point of curvature; (9) thence southwesterly along a 51.70 foot radius curve leading to the right through a central angle of 53'48'06" for arc of 48.55 feet to o point of compound curvature, (11) thence westerly along o 409.50 foot radius curve leading to the right through a central angle of 09' 42'33" for an arc of 69.39 feet to a point of tangency; (12) thence N 76'35'22" W for 57.06 feet; thence N89'29'24"W for 144.53 feet to a point on the east right right-of-way tine of Biscayne Boulevard (U.S. Highway #1); thence N0C'30'36"E along said east right-of-woy line for 34.00 feet to the Point of Beginning. I. SITE: FINGER DEVELOPMENT Exhibit C" BICAYNE BOULEVARD BETWEEN NE 38TH STREET AND 20TH TERRACE, MIAMI, FLORIDA. FOR MORE DETAIL SEE EXHIBIT "A" UNDER ARTICLE I, TAB A. 2. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SEE MMLBrr "A" UNDER ARTICLE I TAA H. 3. SITE ZONING: SD -6 4. PERMITTED USES: THE PERMITTED USES ARE, BUT NOT LIMITED TO MULTIPLE FAMILY BrTWINGS. PROPOSED: RESIDENTIAL 437 UNITS COMMERCIAL 19,400 S.F. S. LOT AREA GROSS: 263,333 S.F. (6.504 ACRES) NET: 203,705 S.F. (4.876 ACRES) IAT COVERAGE: 46.2% 6. BUILDING FOOTPRINT APARMENT BUILDINGS 77,424 S.F. PARKING GARAGE 53,446 S.F. TOTAL 130.870 S.F. fim WAN _.; . MAX. PERMITTED: F.A.R. = SEVW AND TWO-TENTHS (7,2) X GROSS LOT AREA (7.2) X 283,332 S.F. 2,039,990 S.F. PROPOSED: F.A.R. _+ 580.282 S.F. (2.53) 8. DENSITY MAX. PERMITTED: 500 UNI'T'S PER ACRE = 500 X 6.504 ACRES = 3252 UNITS PROPOSED: 437 UNITS (87.19 UNITS/ACRE) 9. OPEN SPACE 0 MIN, REQUIRED: 1 S.F. PER 10 S.F. OF RESMENTIAL FLOOR AREA = 1/10 X 580,882 S.F. 58.088 S.F. PROPOSED: 84,380 S.F. 10. SETBACKS REQUIRED: FRONT (BISCAYNE BLVD) 0' MW T'0 28' MM. TO REAR OF ARCADE AT STREET LEVEL 15' ABOVE STREET -LEVEL SIDE STREET 5' NORTH HAYSHORE DRIVE S' NO MINIMUM REQUIREMNTS FOR ALL INTERIOR YARDS (SIDE, REAR, & SPECIAL) PROPOSED: FRONT (BISCAYNE BLVD) 15' TO REAR OF ARCADE AT STREET LEVTr`1. 15' ABOVE STREET LEVEL SIDE STREET 5' NORTH BAYSHORE DRIVE 5' NO MhXWt rM REQUIRMUNM FOR ALL INTERIOR YARDS (SIDE, REAR, do SPECIAL) i 1. PARKING: MIN. REQUIRED; (1 SPACE PER UNIT) + (1 SPACE PER 1000 S.F. OF RETAIL) 437 + 13,400 S.F.11000 = 457 SPACES PROPOSED: 701 SPACES* 'INCLUDES 15 HANDICAPPED SPACES (RESIDENTIAL RATIO 1.55 PER UNIT) 12. OFFSTIR,EET LOADING MIN. REQUIR' m (4) Bn TRS * 12' WIDE X 35' LONG (1) BERTH ® 12' WIDE X 55' LONG PROPOSED: (4) BERTHS 0 12' WIDE X 35' LONG (1) BERTH ® 12' WIDE X 55' LONG 13. MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT ALLOWED: UNLIMITED PROVIDED: 157'-0" TOWER HEIGHT 71'-6" ALL OTHER APT BiULDINGS PLANNING FACT SHEET APPLICANT Vicky Garcia -Toledo, Esq. for Finger Biscayne, LLC, HEARING DATE September 19, 2001 REQUISTILOCATION Major Use Special Permit for the Biscayne Village Project located at approximately 311, 323 & 405 NE 199' St.; 304, 331, 334, 340, 354, 357, 362, 365, 367, 372, 375 and 391 NE 201h St.; 322, 340 and 360 NE 20th Terrace; 2010 North Bayshore Drive and 1917 and 2025 Biscayne Boulevard. LEGAL DESCRIPTION Complete legal description on file with the Hearing Boards Office. PETITION Consideration of approving a Major Use Special Permit for the Biscayne Village Project located at approximately 311, 323 & 405 NE 19'h St.; 304, 331, 334, 340, 354, 357, 362, 365, 367, 372, 375 and 391 NE 201h St.; 322, 340 and 360 NE 20'h Terrace; 2010 North Bayshore Drive and 1917 and 2025 Biscayne Boulevard in order to allow a mixed use development project consisting of 437 residential units, 19,400 sq. ft. of retail space, with 701 parking spaces. PLANNING RECOMMENDATION BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD CITY COMMISSION Approval with conditions. See attached. Approval with conditions N/A VOTE: 8-1. APPLICATION NUMBER 01-051 Item #3 ._ .. _. _._ .__.. _.............._ ....... _................ ... _. _ m.......„ „. ._ . _ .......» CITY OF MIAMI • PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT 444 SW 2 N AVENUE, 3RD FLOOR s MIAMI, FLORIDA, 33130 PHONE (305) 416-1400 Date: 9/13/2001 PZ -1 0 • Analysis for Major Use Special Permit for the BISCAYNE VILLAGE PROJECT located at APPROXIMATELY 405 NE 19' STREET; 323 NE 19TR STREET; 311 NE 19TH STREET 391 NE 20' STREET; 375 NE 20' STREET; 372 NE 20TH STREET; 365 NE 26M STREET; 357 NE 20TH STREET; 367 NE 20TH STREET; 331 NE 20TH STREET; 1917 BISCAYNE BOULEVARD; 304 NE 20TH STREET; 354 NE 20TR STREET; 362 NE 20TH STREET; 334 NE 26TH STREET; 340 NE 201" STREET; 2010 NORTH BAYSHORE DRIVE; 360 NE 20TH TERRACE; 340 NE 20TH TERRACE; 322 NE 20TR TERRACE; AND 2025 BISCAYNE BOULEVARD CASE NO. 2001-051 Pursuant to Ordinance 11000, as amended, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, the subject proposal for the Biscayne Village Project has been reviewed to allow a Major Use Special Permit. This Permit also includes the following requests: CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 906.6, for active recreational facilities (including swimming pools); CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT to permit staging and parking during construction (to be approved prior to obtaining a building permit from the Department of Planning and Zoning); CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 925.3.8, to allow development/construction/ rental signage; CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 920.1, to allow a construction trailer; CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 6, Section 606.3.1, for development of new construction within the Special District; CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 6, Section 606.3.1, for a temporary construction fence and covered walkway; MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 17 for development of 437 residential units; MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 17 for parking structure of 701 parking spaces; PER CITY CODE, Chapter 36, Construction Equipment, request for waiver from the City Commission of noise ordinance during construction; Ui-11!,1"'), / REQUEST that the following MUSP conditions be required at the time of shell permit instead of at issuance of foundation permit: a. the requirement to record in the Public Records a Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions providing that the ownership, operation and maintenance of all common areas and facilities will be by the property owner or a mandatory property owner association; and b. the requirement to record in the Public Records a unity of title or covenant in lieu of unity of title. Pursuant to Articles 13 and 17 of Zoning Ordinance 11000, approval of the requested Major Use Special Permit shall be considered sufficient for the subordinate permits requested and referenced above as well as any other special approvals required by the City which may be required to carry out the requested plans. The requested Special Permit is for the purpose of allowing a mixed-use development project with consisting of 437 residential units, with accessory recreation space, 19, 400 square feet of retail uses along Biscayne Boulevard, and 701 843 parking spaces. In determining the appropriateness of the proposed residential project, the Planning and Zoning Department has referred this project to the Large Scale Development Committee (LSDC) for additional input and recommendations; the following findings have been made: It is found that the proposed mixed-use/residential development project will benefit the Downtown and Biscayne Boulevard Districts by creating new housing opportunities, and new housing typologies in the North Biscayne Boulevard area to serve both Downtown and the Boulevard. • It is found that the subject property has convenient access to Margaret Pace Park and public transit that makes it ideally suited for residential and retail as a mixed use to serve the area. It is found that the project was reviewed by the Large Scale Development Committee on June 27, 2001 and has been modified to address the expressed technical concerns raised at said Large Scale Development Committee meeting; however, replatting will have to be approved and additional design details related to sidewalk and swale area improvements will have to be submitted at the time of permitting. • It is found that the proposed project was reviewed for design appropriateness by the Planning and Zoning Department; the staff review resulted in design modifications which were then recommended for approval to the Planning and Zoning Director. It is found that with respect to all additional criteria as specified in Section 1305 of Zoning Ordinance 11000, the proposal has been reviewed and found to be adequate. L� LAS 0 0 Based on these findings, the Planning and Zoning Department is recommending approval of the requested Development Project with the following conditions: 1. The approval of this Major Use Special Permit shall be subject,.Jo::the recordation of the following documents prior to the issuance of any building permits for the proposed project: a. Unity of Title or covenant in lieu thereof providing that the ownership, operation and maintenance of all common areas and facilities will be by the property owner or a mandatory property owner association in perpetuity or completion of the State of Florida condominium process which assures the same compliance. b. Development Order specifying that the Development Order runs with the land and is binding on the Applicant, it successors and assigns, jointly or severally. 2. Pursuant to the Department of Public Works, the property must be replatted and requires plans for proposed sidewalk and Swale area improvements prior to the issuance of a building permit. 3. Pursuant to the Fire and GSA Departments, the roof area of the proposed structure shall be made available to the City of Miami for any necessary communications equipment at no charge to the City. a. Submittal of a parking plan for construction employees while the new building is under construction; said parking plan small be subject to review and approval by the Planning Department prior to the issuance of any building permits and must comply with the Development Order criteria. 5. This approval shall also be subject to all additional conditions as specified in the attached Development Order. REVISED RESOLUTION PAB -81-01 A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS AS SPECIFIED BY STAFF, OF A CONSIDERATION OF APPROVING A MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT APPLICATION FOR THE BISCAYNE VILLAGE PROJECT, LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY 311, 323 AND 405 NE 19TH STREET, 304, 331, 334, 340, 354, 357, 362, 365, 367, 372, 375 AND 391 NE 20"" STREET, 322, 340 AND 360 NE 20.. TERRACE, 2010 NORTH BAYSHORE DRIVE AND 1917 AND 2025 BISCAYNE BOULEVARD, IN ORDER TO ALLOW A MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT PROJECT CONSISTING OF 437 RESIDENTIAL UNITS, 19,400 SQUARE FEET OF RETAIL SPACE WITH 701 PARKING SPACES. HEARING DATE: September 19, 2001 ITEM NO. 3 VOTE: 8-1 ATTEST: elab - the , Director Planning and Zoning Department Z N[ w. _ 24 Flo L•! �' s=. a .I� �2 II t i .0 II 2 ELJ N F 23 {f} TERRANOVA BISCAYNE r 0.• r0 R KE 22 N • { r =0 S +r w+ a 'r g •] s4 HMN i•i "` U, s r, J 11 1l!f U �I! I�u-, ] S { f +Arlt rAMlli {Y{ � 1+IFCT A C F ZI P R WI � 1 ' if• r ST. TEMPLE PARK ISRAEL SUB. CITY CEMETERY t 9 v Q z a�,s •Z ql� PrwSE 8 I I F� ml D IT T RR. RA6T J TRACT "A" V q�VYV !L L}R I RA • { j ! - OMNI ANNEX •e a HE� I N. E. 17 ST. c ' xa. z 7R��r l41i I- P.RCCL I ' i cchri - _ Z N[ w. _ 24 Flo L•! �' s=. a .I� �2 II t i .0 II 2 ELJ N F 23 {f} TERRANOVA BISCAYNE r 0.• r0 R KE 22 N • { r =0 S +r w+ a 'r g •] s4 HMN i•i "` U, - ��f r, J 11 1l!f T �I! I�u-, ] S { f +Arlt rAMlli {Y{ � 1+IFCT A C F ZI P R WI � 1 ' if• r ST. co N q 20 a 3 VENETI t 9 v Q z a�,s •Z ql� PrwSE 8 I I F� 1 RA6T STo I� n 2 L}R I RA • { j ! HE� I V.• .. • I 1 j xa. z 7R��r l41i I- P.RCCL I ' i 21 • T .. . r.. ,x — s z ac 3 x • i 5 '° � 3 2 C U!, T'. Z. xr - am. - 2 c., N JE. 19 N ST •J� '`n•r E 5 f s � i o trA ., 9 "3 4p wil.00u R ._ 4 'r •r. �,.�u u � o NE 5 TRACT 'A" rL �T 4 ILL 5 NE 16 �'T ST -.i TRACT F 166 341 !• E _ r 4. r e >• i T �• 4 TI - wit ' Il :, r, t � •. � . � � • e • .. _ C T� U, - ��f 11 1l!f T �I! I�u-, CBCT 0 s e ZI P R WI � s if• r 1 x a co a. n+� VENETI t 9 v Q z a�,s •Z ql� PrwSE 8 I I F� U, , O 0 CBCT 0 s e s c�QN PLAZA C� n+� VENETI _• �" I... + `(r PrwSE 8 I I F� 1 RA6T 0 1 0 . CITY OF MIAMI PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPLICATION FOR MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT IT IS INTENDED THAT MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMITS BE REQUIRED WHERE SPECIFIED USES AND/OR OCCUPANCIES INVOLVE MATTERS DEEMED TO BE OF CITYWIDE OR AREA -WIDE IMPORTANCE. THE CITY COMMISSION SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR DETERN MIATIONS ON APPLICATIONS FOR MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMITS.(SEEARTICLE 17 OF ORDINANCE 11000, ASAMEINDED, THEZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITYOFMIAMI, FLORIDA.) THE CITY COMMISSION SHALL REFER ALL APPLICATIONS FOR MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMITS TO THE PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD AND TO THE DIRECTOR OF THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT FOR RECOMMENDATIONS, AND MAY MAKE REFERRALS TO AGENCIES, BODIES, OR OFFICERS. EITHERTHROUGH THE PLANNING DEPARTMENTOR DIRECTLY, FOR REVIEW, ANALYSIS AND/OR TECHNICAL FINDINGS AND DETERMINATIONS AND REPORTS THEREON. (SEESECTION 1301. S OF ORDINANCE 11000, AS AMENDED, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI. FLORIDA) SECTION 2.633 OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, AS AMENDED, GENERALLY REQUIRES ANY PERSON WHO RECEIVES COMPENSATION, REMUNERATION OR EXPENSES FOR CONDUCTING LOBBYING ACTIVITIES TO REGISTER AS A LOBBYIST WITH THE CITY CLERK. PRIOR TO ENGAGING €]V LOBBYING ACTIVITIES BEFORE CITY STAFF, BOARDS, COMMITTEES AND THE CITY COMMISSION. A COPY OF SAID ORDINANCE IS AVAILABLE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK (MIAMI CITY HALL), LOCATED AT 3500 PAN AMERICAN DRIVE, MIAMI, FLORIDA 33133. NOTE: THIS APPLICATION MUST BE TYPEWRITTEN AND SIGNED IN BLACK INK 1, Vicky Garcia -Toledo as attorney for Finger Biscayne, LLC, hereby apply to the Director of the Planning Department of the City of Miami for approval of a Major Use Special Permit under the provisions of Article 17 of the City of Miami Zoning Ordinance. Property Address: N.E. 20 Termce3 322 N.E. 20 Terrace: 2025 Biscayne Boulevard (Folio numbers are part of Exhibit "A") Nature of proposed use (be specific): A residential aoartment building with parking garage and recreational amenities. APPLICATION MATERIALS I attach the following in support and explanation of the application: 1. Two original surveys, prepared by a State of Florida Registered Land Surveyor within one year from the date of application. 2. Affidavit disclosing ownership of property covered by application and disclosure of interest form (attach forms 4-83 and 4a-83 to application). 01-1t_1.1157 APPLICATION MATERIALS (continued) I attach the following in support and explanation of the application: 3. Certified list of owners of real estate within a 500 -foot radius from the outside boundaries of property (attach form 6-83 to application). 4. Maps of the: (a) Existing zoning designation. (b) Adopted comprehensive plan designation for areas on and around the property. 5. General location map showing relation to the site or activity to major streets, schools, existing utilities, shopping areas. important physical features in and adjoining the project, and the like. 6. Concept Plan (a) Site plan and relevant information per Section 1304.2.1d -h. (b) Relationships to surrounding existing and proposed futures uses and activities, systems and facilities, per Section 1702.3.2a. (c) How concept affects existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan principles and designations; tabulation of any required variances, special permits, changes of zoning or exemptions, per Section 1702-3.2b. 7. Developmental Impact Study (an application for development approval for a Development of Regional Impact may substitute). 8. Other (be specific):See Addendum to A1212lication for Major Use Special Exception 9. Fee of , for the Major Use Special Permit, based on current fee schedule as set forth in Chapter 62 of the Code of the City of Miami, as amended. Additional fee of S , for any required special permits, changes of zoning or variances set forth in chapter 62 of the Code of the City of Miami, as amended. Total Fee: S Signature Name Address Phone/Fax Date Miami FL 33131 305-350-2409 / 305-374-7593 / FINAL APPROVAL. OF THIS APPLICATION FOR MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT SHALL CONSIST OF AN EXECUTED RESOLUTION BY THE MIAMI CITY COMMISSIONS -ND A DEVELOPMENT ORDER ATTACHED THERETO WHICH SPECIFIES THE CONDITIONS UNDER WHICH TRIS MAJOR USE SPECIAL. PERMIT APPLICATION IS APPROVED; IF APPROVED BYTHE CITY CONINIISSION, SAID RESOLUTION AND DEVELOPMENTORDERSHALL, UPONEXECUTION THEREOF BE TRANSMITTED TO THE OWNER OR AUTHORIZED AGENT AT THE ADDRESS SPECIFIED ABOVE. Note I. Note 2. Note 3. Note 4. proj ect. Note 5. Note 6. BISCAYNE VILLAGE ADDENDUM TO APPLICATION FOR MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT July, 2001 Request for Major Use Special Permits for: a) To construct a residential building with 437 units. b) To construct a parking structure containing 701 spaces. a) Class H to permit new construction in SD -6. a) Class I to permit permanent recreation facilities. b) Class I to permit the staging and parking during construction. c) Class I to permit development/construction/rental signage. and trailer d) Class I to permit construction fence To request from the City Commission: a) a waiver from the noise ordinance during the required concrete pours for construction of the To apply for all lesser permits as may be required to allow development and construction of this phase project as contemplated under this Major Use Special Permit application as submitted and as per plans on file,. The above Major Use Special Permit is to encompass all lower ranking special permits necessary to complete the projects as per plans under Tab 6 DISCLOSURE OF OWNERSHIP 1. Legal description and street address of subject real property: See attached Exhibit "A" 2. Owner(s) of subject real Property and percentage of ownership. Note: Section 2-618 of the Code of the City of Miami requires disclosure of all parties having a financial interest, either direct or indirect in the subject matter of a presentation, request or petition to the City Commission. Accordingly, question #2 requires disclosure of shareholders of corporations, beneficiaries of trusts, and/or any other interested parties, together with their addresses and proportionate interest. Owner: Finger Biscayne, LLC 100% Owned by: The Finger Companies 100% Owned by: Marvy Finger 100% 3. Legal description and street address of any real property (a) owned by any party listed in answer to question #2, and (b) located within 375 feet of the subject real property. N/A Vicky Garcia -T. edo, Esq. Attorney for er STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI -DADS The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 30th day of July, 2001, by Vicky Garcia - Toledo, Esq., as attorney for Owner, on behalf of the corporation. She is personally known to me and who did not take an oath. MY COWAISSION # Cr. 61-1886 pig; gpnf Notary Public -State of Florida 19, 2k Commission No.: C C $ 6% FS {i My Commission Expires:; 1 t?, Zpo3 r . 0 OWNER'S LIST Owner's Name: The Finger Biscayne, LLC Mailing Address: c/o Vic Garcia, -,Toledo, Es 200 So. Biscayne Blvd., Suite 2500 Miami FL 33131 Telephone Number: 305-350-2409 Legal Description: Owner's Name: N/A Mailing Address: Telephone Number: Legal Description: Owner's Name: N/A Mailing Address: Telephone Number: Legal Description: Any other real estate property owned individually, jointly or severally (by corporation, partnership or privately) within 375 feet of the subject site is listed as follows: Street. Address Legal DescriRtion N/A N/A 0 DISCLOSURE OF OWNERSHIP• 1. Legal description and street address of subject real property. See Exhibit `B" NE 20" Street from Biscayne Blvd to the East 2. Owner(s) of subject real property and percentage of ownership. Note: Section 2-618 of the Code of the City of Miami requires disclosure of all parties having a financial interest, either direct or indirect, in the subject matter of a presentation, request or petition to the City Commission. Accordingly, question #2 requires disclosure of shareholders of corporations, beneficiaries of trusts, and/or any other interested parties, together with their addresses and proportionate interest. Owner: City of Miami Legal description and street address of any real property (a) owned by any party listed in answer to question #2, and (b) located within 375 feet of the subject real property. NIA STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI -DADS '66 4149J�r- By: Carlos G menet, dtMLiager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ( day of JiR, 200, by Carlos Gimenez, City Manager, on behalf of the City of Miami. He is personally -known to me or has produced as identification and who did ake an o� Name: Notary Public - State of1 d (� Commission No.: (970 r My Commission Expires: - 52054E JL d OWNER'S LIST Owner's Name: Ci1y of Miami Mailing Address: c/o Vicky Garcia -Toledo Egg- 200 So. Biscayne Blvd., Suite 2500Miami FL 33131 Telephone Number: 305-350-2409 Legal Description: Owner's Name: NIA Mailing Address: Telephone Number: Legal Description: Owner's Name: N/A Mailing Address: Telephone Number: Legal Description: Any other real estate property owned individually, jointly or severally (by corporation, partnership or privately) within 375 feet of the subject site is listed as follows: Street Address Legal Description NIA N/A FINGER DEVELOPMENT .. SITE: $ICAYNE BOULEVARD BETWEEN NE 19TH STREET AND ' ,. ,20TH TERRACE, W MI, FLORMA. FOR MORE DETAIL SEE EXHMIT "A" UNDER ATMCLE I, TAB A. 2. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SEE EMiBIT "A" UNDER ARTICLE I T 3, SITE ZONING: SD -8 4. PERMITTED USES: THE PERMITTED USES ARE, BUT NOT MULTIPLE FAMILY BUiL,I3INGS. PROPOSED: RESIDENTIAL 437 UNITS COMMERCIAL 19,400 S.F. 5. LOT AREA GROSS: 283,332 S.F. (8.504 NET: 203,705 S.F. (4.676 LOT COVERAGE: 48.22 6. BUILDING FOOTPRINT APARMENT BUILDINGS 77,424 S.F. PARKING GARAGE 53,446 S.F. TOTAL 130,870 S.F 7. F.A.R. MAX. PER)OTTED: F.A.R. = SEVEN AND TWO (7.2) X 283,332 S.F. = 2,039,990 S.F. PROPOSED: F.A.R. — 580.282 S.F. (2.53) 8. DENSITY MAX. PERbdxJ'TED: 500 UNITS PER ACRE = 500 X 6.504 ACRES = 3252 UNITS PROPOSED 437 UNITS (87.19 UNITS/ACRE) H. LIMTED TO (7.2) X GROSS LOT AREA jJL s -j d i 9. OPEN SPACE MIN. REQUIRED: 1 S.F. PER 10 S.F. OF RESIDENTIAL FLOOR AREA 1/10 X 5£0,882 S.F. 58.488 S.F. PROPOSED: 84,380 S.F. 10. SETBACKS REQUIRx,'D: • FRONT (BISCAYNE BLVD) 0' MIN TO 28' MAX. TO REAR OF ARCADE AT STREET LEVET, 15' ABOVE STREET—IML SIDE STREET 5' NOME RAYSHORE DRIVE 5' NO MDUUUM REQUIREMENTS FOR ALL INTERIOR YARDS (SIDE, REAR, & SPECIAL) PROPOSED: FRONT (HISCAYNE BLVD) 15' TO REAR OF ARCADE AT STREET LEVET. 15' ABOVE STREET LEVEL SIDE- STREET . . 5' NORTH BAYSHORE DRIVE S' NO MINNUM REQUIREMENTS FOR ALL INTERIOR YARDS (SIDE, REAR, & SPECIAL) i I . PARKING: MIN. REQUIRED: (1 SPACE PER UNIT) + (1 SPACE PER 1000 S.F. OF RETAIL) 437 + 19,400 S.F.111300 457 SPACES PROPOSED: 701 SPACES0 'INCLUDES 15 HANDICAPPED SPACES (REaiDENTIAL RATIO 1.55 PER UNIT') 12, OFFSTREET LOADING MIN. REQUIRED: (4) BERTHS 0 12' WIDE X 35' LONG (1) BERTH • 12' WIDE X 55' LONG PROPOSED: (4) .BERTHS 0 12' NIDE X 35' LONG (1) BERTH ® 12' WIDE X 56' LANG 13. MAX. ]BUILDING HEIGHT ALLOWED: UNLIMITED PROVIDED: 157'--0" TOWER HEIGHT 71'-6" ALL. OTHER APT BUILDINGS i ARTICLE II. Description MAJOR A. Zoning Ordinance No. 11000 1. Section 1304.2.1 2. Section 1702.2.1 3. Section 1702.2.2 Major SPECIAL PERNUT DESCRIPTION forms; supplementary materials Report se Special Permit Concept Plan u BISCAYNE VILLAGE MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT PROJECT DESCRIPTION Zoning Ordinance No. 11000 0 1. Section 1304.2.1 Application forms; supplementary materials (a) Statement of ownership and control of the proposed development of activity. The Disclosure of Ownership and Ownership Affidavit are provided in Article I. (b) Statement describing in detail the character and intended use of the development of activity. Biscayne Village is an urban infill project adhering to the principle of new urban design and incorporating responsible planning technique. The project consists of residential units over the ground floor retail shops and implements the live/work concept. Biscayne Village is a residential project consisting of one; two and three bedroom rental apartments and lofts overlooking Biscayne Bay, ground floor retail along Biscayne Boulevard. The project is centrally located in the Omni neighborhood near Downtown Miami, fronting on Biscayne Boulevard with splendid views of Biscayne Bay. The Biscayne Village project will have on-site parking located in four (4) floors of parking decks strategically located internally to the project with 701parking spaces for maximum design and access benefits. The project will also provide recreational space with pool and spa/club house. A shop will be provided on the North Bayshore Drive frontage along Biscayne Bay. Approximately 19,000 sq. ft. of ground floor retail will be located along Biscayne Boulevard. The project's advantageous location adjacent to Biscayne Bay will provide waterfront living at affordable prices to area residents. The Finger Companies project in developing this project will dedicate to the City sufficient land to allow the north/south continuation of North Bayshore Drive from 19th Street to 201h Street Alley, thus enhancing the waterfront promenade from Margaret Pace Park to the north, and unifying and improving internal connections for the area. (c) General location map, showing relation of the site or activity for which special permit is sought to major streets, schools, existing utilities, shopping areas, important physical features in and adjoining the project or activity and the like. The following exhibits are included with the Major Use Special Permit Application and are located under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (i) Location Map: Map of the surrounding street system indicating the project location. Area Context Map: Map of the project area indicating buildup in the surrounding area. (iii) Aerial'. Aerial Photograpt of the surrounding area indicating the project site. (d) A site plan containing the title f the project and the names of the project planner and developer, date, and north arrow nd , based on an exact survey of the property drawn to a scale of sufficient size to show: The Site plan is located as Sheet k 1.01 under'rab 6 of the Supporting Documents. i. Boundaries of the project any existing streets, building, watercourses, easements and section lines; The boundaries of the project and the location of existing streets are shown on the survey located under Tat, 5 of the Supporting Documents. ii. Exact location of all buildings and structures; The exact location of all existing buildings located on the Property is shown on the survey located under Ta 5 of the Supporting Documents. The location of the building to be constructed are shown on the Site Pian, under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. iii. Access and traffic flow and how vehicular traffic will be separated from pedestrian and other types of traffic; A detailed analysis of th site access and traffic flow for the development is provided in the Traffic Impact Analysis located under Tab 2 of the Supporting Documents. Service vehicles will ac�ess the loading docks from the service entrance. 1. Off-street parki�g and off-street loading area; Off-street parking willi e provided in parking garages internally to the project. All parking levels will have' access from ground floor ramps. The parking garages will consist of four (4) levet parking decks. The loading berths arevailabie to each side of the project to facilitate access and service. Some of the be hs will be reduced in size through a Class II Special Permit. 2. Recreational F461ities; Location and access t recreational facilities can be found under Tab 6 of the Supporting] 3. Screens and • 0 Landscaping areas are indicated on the Landscape Plan, under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. 4. Refuse collections areas; Waste collection will be provided by a containerized compactor system located in the service area throughout the project (4 separate service areas). These facilities are shown on the Ground Level Plan under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. 5. Access to utilities and points of utilities hookups. Access and connections to site utilities are discussed in the Site Utility Study located under Tab 3 of the Supporting Documents (e) Tabulations of total gross acreage in the project and the percentages thereof proposed to be devoted to the permitted uses and ground coverage. 203,700 gross square feet 4.68 gross acres The various permitted uses. Proposed: Residential and Commercial Building Footprint: 77, 424 gross square feet ii. Ground coverage by structures. Ground coverage by the structures is 130,870 or 46% of the total gross lot area. (f) Tabulation showing: i. The derivation of numbers of off street parking and off street loading spaces shown in (d) above: The number of off street parking spaces required: 457 spaces The total amount of parking spaces provided: 701 spaces Including 15 handicapped spaces ii. Total project density in dwelling units per acre. Allowed: 4.68 acres x 500 units per acre = 2,340 units Proposed: 437 units / 93.3 units per acres (g) If common facilities (such as recreation areas of structures, private streets, common open space, etc.) are to be provided for the development, statements as to how such common facilities are to be provided and permanently maintained. 2. (h) (i) 0) (k) (1) (m) 1. 2. The project contains several open maintained by the Owner. Storm drainage and sanitary Storm drainage, water distr discussed in the Site Utility Architectural definitions for The design plans are included 11 is areas and walkways. All facilities provided will be plans. waste water and solid waste generation provisions are located under Tab 3 of the Supporting Documents. in the development; Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. The development will include 47 units. Typical floor plans for the residential floors are included on sheets A2 -A4 under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. Landscaping plan, including type , sizes and locations ofvegetation and decorative shrubbery, and showing provisions for irrigation and future maintenance. cated n Sheet P-3 under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents, The Landscaping Plan lo specify the plant types, sizes and Iocations, as well as indications that all planted areas will be fully irrigated and maintained by the Owner of the project. Pians for recreation facilities, if for such use. Such additional data, maps, p activity involved. The Drawings submitted with Documents. Such additional data as the apf the site and development plan. Elevations depicting the Supporting Documents. Section 1702.2.1 General , including location and general description of buildings or statements as may be required for the particular use or Application are located under Tab 6 of the Supporting may believe is pertinent to the proper consideration of character of the project are included under Tab 6 of the Property ownership or o"erships and beneficial interest within the boundaries of the area proposed for Major Use Special Permit. Statement of Ownership and b, Major Use Special Permit are The nature of the interest within the boundaries of the area proposed for 1 in Article 1.13 & C. I interest or control. The nature of unified interest or control is indicated in Article 1. 3. Survey of the proposed area showing property lines and ownership. A copy of the survey of the Property is included under Tab 5 of the Supporting Documents. 4. Map of existing features, including streets, alleys, easements, utilities lines, existing land use, general topography, and physical features. The existing site features and utility lines are shown on the survey of Property located under Tab 5 and the Site Utility Study located under Tab 3 of the Supporting Documents. In addition, the surrounding street systems are included under Tab 2, Traffic Impact Study and an aerial photograph of the surrounding area indicating the project site is found under Tab 6, Page 3. 5. Materials to demonstrate the relationship of the elements listed in (d) preceding to surrounding area characteristics. The Drawings Submitted with this Application are located under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. Materials may be presented to the Urban Design and Review Board for review. 6. Existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan designations for the area on and around the Iands proposed for Major Use Special Permit. The existing zoning designation for the Property pursuant to City of Miami Ordinance No. 11000, as Amended is SD -6. The Zoning Atlas Map on pages 21 and 23 indicates the existing and surrounding mixed use zoning. The comprehensive plan future land use designation for the Property is restricted commercial. The zoning and comprehensive plan designation are consistent with one another, 3. Section 1702,2.2 Major Use Special Permit Concept Plan. 1. Relationships of the concept plan to surrounding existing and proposed future uses. Activities, systems and facilities (transportation, recreation, view corridors, pedestrian systems, services systems and similar uses). Article H contains a written narrative of the Project outlining proposed uses, activities and architectural character. This narrative also contains descriptions of the Project's relationship to traffic, pedestrian movements, and transportation access. Maps located on Tab 6 indicate the Project's relationship to surrounding streets, land uses and functions. Building elevations, sections and perspectives showing the proposed materials, vertical profile and height, and orientation to streets is included in the Drawings Submitted with this Application. The list of Drawings Submitted is found under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. 2. Existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan principles and designations. The Project conforms to the SD -6 zoning for this Property. The comprehensive plan future land use designation conforms with the land use designation currently in effect for this Property. ,A, J1-- '.._r".6 d 4. Set back requirements under the Code are satisfied. This design requirement has been undertaken in order to augment the open space for the future tenants use. The dedication of North B ayshore Drive has been undertaken to enhance waterfront use for the Omni/Edgewater neighborhood. Section 1702.2.3 Developmental Impact Study. 1. A traffic analysis shall be submitted for an area within approximately 114 mile of the site, or an area including 1he major intersections to be impactedby the site, whichever is larger. The Traffic impact Analysis is i cluded under Tab 2 of the Supporting Documents. 2, Economic impact data shall be provided, including estimates for construction costs, construction employment, and permanent employment. The Economic impact Study is i cluded under Tab 4 of the Supporting Documents. 3. A housing impact assessment. The Project is a residential project comprised of 437 residential units, on land that is currently vacant. 4. A description of proposed energy conservation measures shall be provided, including only those measures the t are proposed in addition to the minimum requirements in State Energy Code. Architecturally, the building en elope will be comprised of insulated walls and roof. Other energy conservation data may b submitted at the time of construction permitting. Electrically, all exterior and Ianscape lighting will be controlled by means of time clocks and photocell switches. Energy sa ing lamps, ballasts and fixtures are being considered in all common areas. 5. Historic buildings. There are no historic structuresl located on the Property. 6. Environmental zone. The Property is not located wit in an environmental preservation district. CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO Walter Foeman City Clerk FROM: oil�qen Damaso Chief of Staff to Commissioner Sanchez DATE October 26, 2001 FLEE SUBJECT: Jennings Rule Biscayne Village REFERENCES: ENCLOSURES: am forwarding correspondence received by Commissioner Joe Sanchez through electronic mail and not viewed by Commissioner Joe Sanchez regarding Biscayne Village and Margaret Pace. Cc: Alejandro Vilarello, City Attorney 0, Page 1 of 2 Sanchez, Joe From: J.E.Roiz Oeroiz@bellsouth.net] Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 3:02 PM To: Sanchez, Joe Cc: Gort, Willy; Regalado, Tomas; Winton, John L.; Carollo, Joe; Teele, Arthur Subject: Biscayne Village vs. Margaret Pace-- Regarding District 3 Dear Commissioner Sanchez. You appointed me to the Planning Advisory Board, so that I could look at the city's proposed land use plans, ahead of the City Commission, and provide you with recommendations. This is what I am eagerly trying to do at this time. In my humble opinion, it would be in the best interest of the District 3 residents, as well as the rest of the Miami citizens, if the Biscayne Village project provided enough Right of Way dedication on North Bayshore Drive, for diagonal parking in front of the Margaret Pace Pa rk. This is in the best interest of the city residents because it will facilitate access to the (bay front) park and possible kayak marina extension, to everyone, not only the adjacent neighbors. The developer will have to make a sacrifice on behalf of the city residents, however, there might be something they may need from the City, in exchange. Obviously, the nearby neighbors will not be in agreement. They would rather keep the park and bay front as exclusive property. I have left in your office copy of a paper dissenting from the city staff regarding the Right of Way dedication by the Biscayne Village project. I hope that if you do not have time to meet with me, to get informed on this issue before Thursday's meeting, you will have time to read my Opinion in this case. There is a great opportunity to be missed here. City Planning is an art, it could have many interpretations. The results of a planning decision are normally seen many years later. At any time, the "best planning" will be the planning done by those with more power. If no one else stops it, any one could "push" a planning mistake. Please, let me know if you will have time to see me before Thursday's meeting. I would take time off from work to attend the hearing, if I knew that, at least, you are in agreement with this position. Right of Way dedications are specified by the Public Works Dept. The current 50 foot dedication, is the MINIMUM City of Miami standard. This minimum width was probably zoned many years ago. Sincerely Jesus Roiz Member Planning Advisory Board 10/25/2001 • • Page 1 of 4 Sanchez, Joe _ From: J.E,Roiz Deroiz@bellsouth.net] Sent: Monday, October 08, 2001 12:48 AM To: Teele, Arthur; Winton, John L. Cc: Manny Diaz; Ana Gelabert; Dominguez, Albert A.; Internet City Manager Office; Emiliano Antunez; Maer, Miriam; Carollo, Joe; Sanchez, Joe; Slazyk, Lourdes Y,; Regalado, Tomas; Gort, Willy; Xavier Suarez; Lewis, Annette Subject: Miamians Access to Biscayne Bay Land Locked Miamians Seek Access to Biscayne Bay A Kayak Marina Proposal Dear Commissioners Teele and Winton, Every Miami resident with whom I speak regarding the issue of access to the bay, expresses a desire to enjoy the water front. The fact that Miamians have almost no access to the bay and to public, marine activities, is incomprehensible to me and to a great number of people both in and outside of Miami. Throughout the years, influential, well organized individuals have taken over the bay front in detriment to the rest of the residents. From Belle Meade, Morningside, Bay Point, the Brickell Avenue Estates (currently, enclosed condos) to the enclosed communities of Coconut Grove, an "exclusion wall" is being erected, land locking Miamians located less than a mile from the water. The AA Arena, that monstrous mausoleum, monument to political ambition and deceit, is one of the latest examples of the exclusion barrier. The laws of supply and demand, by themselves, could justify the above situation if it were not because the City of Miami government, "a government of the people and by the people", has been the instrument to carry out such exclusion. The City Commission, not only has approved the continuous closure of the ever -extending exclusion wall, but also has failed to provide adequate, public access to the bay for the rest of the city and county residents. This note proposes a plan to redress in small measure, the endemic disregard for the less wealthy, majority of the city and county residents, in matters related to bay front access. The plan consists of: A PUBLIC KAYAK MARINA LOCATED AT N. BAYSHORE DR and NE 20TH -21ST STREETS 10/25/2001 0 • Page 2 of 4 At the subject location there is a perfectly formed, rectangular bay inlet ideally suited for the soft and quiet utilization of kayaks and row boats in general. Directly adjacent to the Margaret Pace Park this marina will be a perfect addition to the park and could turn the spot into a regional sports and pleasure location. This facility will attract young couples, and as a direct result, the appeal and value of the adjacent residential real estate in the Omni and Edgewater areas, will increase substantially. I have consulted with the following, regarding this plan: City of Miami Surveyor, City of Miami Public Works Department, City of Miami Asset Management Department, Miami -Dade County DERM Coastal Permitting Section, State of Florida, Department of Environmental Protection, Southeast District, and Bermello, Ajamil and Partners, Architects for the Margaret Pace Park None of these entities has come up with any objections. Just the opposite; they reacted with expressions like: "Neat idea"..."that would be nice"... "your training as a planner has paid up"... "that would be beautiful"... et cetera. Matching funds are available through the Florida Inland Navigation District (FIND) Grants. The project could be handled through the Community Redevelopment Agency, along with the Margaret Pace Park. The only thing missing is the City of Miami staff planning and budgeting, and petitioning for a lease to the State of Florida, owner of that bay bottom. This project will be meaningless to the city of Miami residents if it is not readily accessible to every single person wishing to use it. This facility along with the Margaret Pace Park, should not become the private playground of the adjacent apartment buildings' residents; therefore, plenty and ample parking should be made available immediately. At the present time, parallel parking is provided only along 85 percent of the park frontage, on North Bayshore Drive. No parking is provided in front of the bay inlet. This amount of parking will barely serve the local residents... forget those who live more than one mile away. Changes should be made to the current parking scheme. Also, previous city planning deficiencies should be corrected. North Bayshore Drive is a 72 foot wide street in front of the park. Diagonal (Head In) parking could be provided on the east side of the street, increasing the available parking about 50 percent and facilitating the lowering of kayaks from the vehicle's top carriers. At a forthcoming Commission meeting you will be asked to approve Tentative Plat No. TP 1558-C for the Biscayne Village project. This project covers 15 percent of the Margaret Pace Park front. The City staff has only required this developer to dedicate 10/25/2001 0 a 50 foot wide strip of land for the extension of North Bayshore Drive. Page 3 of 4 The reduced right of way dedicated by the Biscayne Village project is not in best interest of the city Miami residents and should not be approved. If this improper dedication is accepted, the street in front of the park will not be uniform. It will be 72 feet wide on one side of the park and 50 feet (narrow) on the other. In addition, diagonal parking will not be feasible. Other streets in the area (NE 18th St -boulevard-) are up to 80 feet wide. To make matters worse, this project proposes only a 5 foot front set back, which will place the new buildings 55 feet from the park. With the narrow street, the park will become the buildings' front yard instead of one the best and ample City of Miami parks. Biscayne Village should dedicate the full 72 foot right of way, for a uniform North Bayshore Drive, in front of the park. Biscayne Village will benefit so much from this park and the adjacent kayak marina that they should not object to this additional dedication. The project calls for 437 dwelling units in a parcel of land zoned for 3552 dwelling units. The developer will not have to reduce the number of units due to this additional dedication. The Building Department may issue the construction permits without a final plat, and hold the Certificate of Occupancy until the final plat is approved. North of the proposed Biscayne Village project(NE 20th to 21 st Street), the street (right of way) facing the proposed kayak marina, is only 42 feet wide. The City should take immediate steps to change the zoned right of way at this location to match the width of the right of way in front of the park. This additional right of way will eventually provide adequate parking and sidewalks for the kayak marina. A wide street with ample parking and wide sidewalks in front of the Margaret Pace Park and Kayak Marina, will create an appealing "Malecon" or promenade all along the park and marina. No nearsighted, quick solution should be adopted in the case of the Biscayne Village, and the property adjacent to the north, when a better plan is in sight. Your support for this kayak marina will result in a more livable city for all the residents, not only the lucky few who can win the endorsement of a government only concerned with immediate revenues. Thank you Jesus Roiz, Member, City of Miami Planning Advisory Board , e 10/25/2001 r Page 4 of 4 Miami. Click this long link for a street map of the site. Wp://www.mapquest.com/cgi-bin/la flnd.?Iink=btwn/twn- map results&map tab.x=1&uid=uch7i9z4z1gamOmb:2xluz20utl&SNVData=3mad3- h.fy%2808ahyb%29r7n5za%3bah7-%3d%11%2bO%12CGPXNS7o2blN%2b7o13%17% 2bLM7o2b07VV%2bMM%14%3aFJ%12ED_M%12%28xluba%3dGG_14tw9a7O 28.562g00%281 o241w-u.wf7%3bxcx5sf7. rfe o7cs o247wv%28u& cat= Click this link for the Miami Community Redevelopment Agency. http://www.miami-cra.org/ cc. Local Media bcc. Miami Residents. For Privacy 10/25/2001 • • 0 Biscayne Village Developed By: The Finger Companies 99 Detering, Saitn' 200 Houston, TX 77007 Designed By: Cohen Freedman Encinosa & Associates 8085 N.W. 155" Street Miami Lakes, FL 33016 Prepared for: The Finger Companies By: Bilzin Sumberg Dunn Baena Price & Axelrod LLP Vicky Garcia -Toledo, Esq. 2500 First Union Financial Center 200 South Biscayne Boulevard Miami, FL 33131 Submitted into the public record in connection with item on /o • Walter Foeman City Clerk • I. • 0 Project Information 0 BISCAYNE VILLAGE MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT TABLE OF CONTENTS A. Application for a Major Use Special Permit B. Disclosure of Ownership C. Ownership Affidavit 1. Warranty Deed 2. Folio Number information (See Exhibit "A") D. State of Florida Certificate of Good Standing E. Directory of Project Principals F. Project Data Sheet G. City of Miami Zoning Atlas Map II. Project Description A. Zoning Ordinance No. 11000 1. Section 1304.2.1 Application Forms, Supplementary Materials 2. Section 1702.2.1 General Report 3. Section 1702.2.2 Major Use Special Permit Concept Plan III. Supporting Documents Tab 1 Minority Construction Employment Plan Tab 2 Traffic impact Analysis Tab 3 Site Utility Study Tab 4 Economic Impact Study Tab 5 Survey of Property Tab 6 Drawings Submitted C July, 2001 Submitted MLO record in connection ,%jith hom 69 on W,1 Ito,, Cil 0 0 ! 0 BISCAYNE VILLAGE MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT PROJECT INFORMATION ARTICLE I. A. Application for a Major Use Special Permit B. Disclosure of Ownership C. Ownership Affidavit 1. Warranty Deed 2. Folio Number Information D. State of Florida Certificate of Good Standing E. Directory of Project Principals F. Project Data Sheet G. City of Miami Zoning Atlas Map 0 July, 2001 Submitted into the public record In connection with t 4^ item on . J i -, I�. 1 �5 'i Walter Foeman City Clerk E e 0 A • • CITY OF MIAMI PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPLICATION FOR MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT IT IS INTENDED THAT MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMITS BE REQUIRED WHERE SPECIFIED USES AND/OR OCCUPANCIES INVOLVE MATTERS DEEMED TO BE OF CITYWIDE OR AREA -WIDE IMPORTANCE. THE CITY COMMISSION SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR DETERMINATIONS ON APPLICATIONS FOR MAJOR USE SPECIALPERMITS.(SEEARTICLE 17 OF ORDINANCE I 1000, ASAMENDED, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA.) THE CITY COMMISSION SHALL REFER ALL APPLICATIONS FOR MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMITS TO THE PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD AND TO THE DIRECTOR OF THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT FOR RECOMMENDATIONS, AND MAY MAKE REFERRALS TO AGENCIES, BODIES, OR OFFICERS, EITHER THROUGH THE PLANNING DEPARTMENTOR DIRECTLY, FOR REVIEW, ANALYSIS AND/OR TECHNICAL FINDINGS AND DETERMINATIONS AND REPORTS THEREON. (SEESECTION 1301.5 OF ORDINANCE 11000, AS AMENDED, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA.) SECTION 2.633 OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, AS AMENDED, GENERALLY REQUIRES ANY PERSON WHO RECEIVES COMPENSATION, REMUNERATION OR EXPENSES FOR CONDUCTING LOBBYING ACTIVITIES TO REGISTER AS A LOBBYIST W ITH THE CITY CLERK, PRIOR TO ENGAGING IN LOBBYING ACTIVITIES BEFORE CITY STAFF, BOARDS, COMMITTEES AND THE CITY COMMISSION, A COPY OF SAID ORDINANCE IS AVAILABLE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERIC (MIAMI CITY HALL), LOCATED AT 3500 PAN AMERICAN DRIVE, MIAMI, FLORIDA 33133. NOTE: THIS APPLICATION MUST BE TYPEWRITTEN AND SIGNED IN BLACK INK. I, Vicky Garcia -Toledo as attorney for Finger Biscayne, LLC, hereby apply to the Director of the Planning Department of the City of Miami for approval of a Major Use Special Permit under the provisions of Article 17 of the City of Miami Zoning Ordinance. Property Address: 405 N.E. 19 Street-, 323 N.E. 19 Street; 311 N.E. 19 Street•391 N.E. 20 Street; 375 N.E. 20 Street; 372 N.E. 20 Street-, 365 N.E. 20 Street: 357 N.E. 20 Street; 367 N.E. 20 Street; 331 N.E. 20 Street;1917_Bisc�e Blvd; 304 N.E. 20 Street 354 N.E. 20 Street; 362 N.E. 20 Street; 334 N.E. 20 Street; 340 N.E. 20 Street; 2010 North Bayshore Drive; 360 N.E. 20 Terrace; 340 N.E. 20 Terrace; 322 N.E. 20 Terrace; 2025 Biscayne Boulevard (Folio numbers are part of Exhibit "A") Nature of proposed use (be specific): A residential a artment building with parking garage and recreational amenities. APPLICATION MATERIALS I attach the following in support and explanation of the application: i1. Two original surveys, prepared by a State of Florida Registered Land Surveyor within one year from the date of application. 2. Affidavit disclosing ownership of property covered by��, I�lalt➢W aMQisW0sLpvbf1biterest form (attach forms 4-83 and 4a-83 to application). re''ord In connection with item o AP Walter Foemarl • • APPLICATION MATERIALS (continued) . I attach the following in support and explanation of the application: 3. Certified list of owners of real estate within a 500 -foot radius from the outside boundaries of property (attach form 6-83 to application). 4. Maps of the: (a) Existing zoning designation. (b) Adopted comprehensive plan designation for areas on and around the property. 5. General location map showing relation to the site or activity to major streets, schools, existing utilities, shopping areas, important physical features in and adjoining the project, and the like. 6. Concept Plan (a) Site plan and relevant information per Section 1304.2,1 d -h. (b) Relationships to surrounding existing and proposed futures uses and activities, systems and facilities, per Section 1702.3.2a. (c) How concept affects existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan principles and designations; tabulation of any required variances, special permits, changes of zoning or exemptions, per Section 1702-3.2b. 7. Developmental Impact Study (an application for development approval for a Development of Regional Impact may substitute). 0 8. Other (be specific):See Addendum to Application for Major Use Special Exception 9. Fee of $ , for the Major Use Special Permit, based on current fee schedule as set forth in Chapter 62 of the Code of the City of Miami, as amended. Additional fee of $ , for any required special permits, changes of zoning or variances set forth in chapter 62 of the Code of the City of Miami, as amended. Total Fee: $ Signature Name Address Phone/Fax Date _Miami. FL 33131 305-350-2409 / 305-374-7593 FINAL APPROVAL OF THIS APPLICATION FOR MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT SHALL CONSIST OF AN EXECUTED RESOLUTION BY THE MIAMI CITY COMMISSION AND A DEVELOPMENT ORDER ATTACHED THERETO WHICH SPECIFIES THE CONDITIONS UNDER WHICH THIS MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT APPLICATION IS APPROVED; IF APPROVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION, SAID RESOLUTION AND DEVELOPMENT ORDERSHALL, UPON EXECUTION THEREOF BE TRANSMITTED TO THE OWNER OR AUTHORIZED AGENT AT THE ADDRESS SPECIFIED ABOVE. �. Submitted into ihe l3tblic recOrd in connection with iteM Z on 16 • ZS 4/ Jit .z;. _ Walter Forman Note 1. Note 2. Note 3. Note 4. project. Note 5. Note 6. • BISCAYNE VILLAGE ADDENDUM TO APPLICATION FOR MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT July, 2001 Request for Major Use Special Permits for: a) To construct a residential building with 437 units. b) To construct a parking structure containing 701 spaces. a) Class H to permit new construction in SD -6. a) Class I to permit permanent recreation facilities. b) Class I to permit the staging and parking during construction. c) Class I to permit development/construction/rental signage. and trailer d) Class I to permit construction fence To request from the City Commission: a) a waiver from the noise ordinance during the required concrete pours for construction of the To apply for all lesser permits as may be required to allow development and construction of this phase project as contemplated under this Major Use Special Permit application as submitted and as per plans on file,. The above Major Use Special Permit is to encompass all lower ranking special permits necessary to complete the projects as per plans under Tab 6 Submitted into the public record in connection withitem .1 Z Q- Walter Foermon City Clerk i 0 0 0 DISCLOSURE OF OWNERSHIP 1. Legal description and street address of subject real property: See attached Exhibit "A" 2. Owner(s) of subject real Property and percentage of ownership. Note: Section 2-618 of the Code of the City of Miami requires disclosure of all parties having a financial interest, either direct or indirect in the subject matter of a presentation, request or petition to the City Commission. Accordingly, question #2 requires disclosure of shareholders of corporations, beneficiaries of trusts, and/or any other interested parties, together with their addresses and proportionate interest. Owner: Finger Biscayne, LLC 100% Owned by: The Finger Companies 100% Owned by: Marvy Finger 100% 3. Legal description and street address of any real property (a) owned by any party listed in answer to question #2, and (b) located within 375 feet of the subject real property. N/A • STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI -DARE Vicky Garcia -T' edo, Esq. Attorney for er The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 30th day of July, 2001, by Vicky Garcia - Toledo, Esq., as attorney for Owner, on behalf of the corporation. She is personally known to me and who did not take an oath. EUUBE IH pppHENA MY COMMISSION # CC 815896 F)(PIRES: gpn119, 2043 Bondldiln� Pfdu� IMur�a r • QrCIVnM Notary Public -State of Florida Commission No.: C r— 816% 8 (oi My Commission Expires:; j trhl Zp03 Submitted into tho pubi s: record r connectlon with item �2 � on 16 ' Z5' Walter F±oernan City Cleric • Owner's Name: The Finer Biscayne, LLC OWNER'S LIST Mailing Address: c/o Vicky Garcia -Toledo, Esc, 200 So._Biscayne Blvd., Suite 2500, Miami, FL 33131 Telephone Number: 305-350-2409 Legal Description: Owner's Name: N/A Mailing Address: Telephone Number: Legal Description: Owner's Name: N/A Mailing Address: Telephone Number: Legal Description: Any other real estate property owned individually, jointly or severally (by corporation, partnership or privately) within 375 feet of the subject site is listed as follows: Street Address Legal Description NIA N/A rOcord in m1no, item _, on Cit; ck)T.k 0 49 • DISCLOSURE OF OWNERSHIP 1. Legal description and street address of subject real property. See Exhibit "B" NE 20`h Street from Biscayne Blvd to the East 2. Owner(s) of subject real property and percentage of ownership. Note: Section 2-618 of the Code of the City of Miami requires disclosure of all parties having a financial interest, either direct or indirect, in the subject matter of a presentation, request or petition to the City Commission. Accordingly, question #2 requires disclosure of shareholders of corporations, beneficiaries of trusts, and/or any other interested parties, together with their addresses and proportionate interest. Owner: City of Miami Legal description and street address of any real property (a) owned by any party listed in answer to question #2, and (b) Iocated within 375 feet of the subject real property. N/A STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE By: Carlos G(menez, Cit M `nager a -u-- ')3f The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this . --(,r- day of , 200, by Carlos Gimenez, City Manager, on behalf of the City of Miami. He is personally known to me or has produced as identification and who did3o4ake an oats 520591 Name: Notary Public -State of;�Yn ? Commission No.: My Commission Expires: a3tibPiitLi�r, e7 ir6Js11 record in connection VJ!"' item 412 -- � on /0'Z5- 6/ e: _ 0 • • 0 0 OWNER'S LIST Owner's Name:_ U of Miami Mailing Address: c/o Vicky Garcia -Toledo, Esq, 200 So. Biscayne Blvd., Suite 2500, Miami, FL 33131 Telephone Number: 305-350-2409 Legal Description: Owner's Name: NIA Mailing Address: Telephone Number: Legal Description: Owner's Name: NIA Mailing Address: Telephone Number: Legal Description: Any other real estate property owned individually, j ointly or severally (by corporation, partnership or privately) within 375 feet of the subject site is listed as follows: Street Address Legal Description NIA NIA Submitted into the public record -in connection with Item ? // on Walter Foeman City Clerlf' 0 E004 u C 0 i AFFIDAVIT STATE OF FLORIDA } } SS COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE } Before me, the undersigned authority, this day personally appeared Vicky Garcia -Toledo as attorney for Owner, who being by me first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and says: That he/she is the owner, or the legal representative of the owner, submitting the accompanying application for a public hearing as required by the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, affecting the real property located in the City of Miami, as described and listed on the pages attached to this Affidavit and made a part thereof. 2. That all owners which he/she represents, if any, have given their full and complete permission for him/her to act in his/her behalf for the change or modification of a classification or regulation of zoning as set out in the accompanying petition. 3. That the pages attached hereto and made a part of this affidavit contain the current names, mailing addresses, telephone numbers and legal descriptions for the real property of which he/she is the owner or legal representative. 4. The facts as represented in the application and documents submitted in conjunction with this affidavit are true and correct. Further Affiant sayeth not. Vicky Garcia-Tbl , Esq. Attorney for O STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 30'h day of July, 2001, by Vicky Garcia - Toledo, attorney for owner, on behalf of the corporation. She is personally known to me and who did not take an oath. • "' ELIZABETH ktARCHENA _ MY COMMISSION # CC 815888 EXPIRES: April 19, 2003 WWQd Thru Pkhrrd Insurance Agency Name:e1,Zzbe%/t "arCk1,¢v1c_ Notary Public -State of Florida Submittod into the; public Commission No.: C C 8151 F (v record in Connection with My Commission Expires: C4-/9 -Am 02 Orl 6`Z51' 6 .< Walter FOeman City Clerk • 0 0 i 0 rw wwa-17AK•rr1 STATE OF FLORIDA } ) SS COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE ) Before me, the undersigned authority, this day personally appeared Carlos Gimenez, as City Manager, City of Miami, who being by me first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and says: That he/she is the owner, or the legal representative of the owner, submitting the accompanying application for a public hearing as required by the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, affecting the real property located in the City of Miami, as described and listed on the pages attached to this Affidavit and made a part thereof. 2. That all owners which he/she represents, if any, have given their full and complete permission for him/her to act in his/her behalf for the change or modification of a classification or regulation of zoning as set out in the accompanying petition. That the pages attached hereto and made a part of this affidavit contain the current names, mailing addresses, telephone numbers and legal descriptions for the real property of which he/she is the owner or legal representative. 4. The facts as represented in the application and documents submitted in conjunction with this affidavit are true and correct. Further Affiant sayeth not. n Carlos Gimenez, City Ma er, City of Miami 4 STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI -DARE (L4)13 The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this �� day of y, 2001, by Carlos Gimenez, as City Manager, on behalf of the City of Miami. He is erson e or has produced as identification and who did not take an oath. Elm Name: Notary Public -State of Florida Commission No.: Submitted into the My Commission Expires: Public record in connection with Item on Z5-. o/ Walter Foeman City Clerk I.7) r� • • 0 PARCEL l: EXHIBIT "A" 0 Folio # 01-3231-003-0030 Lot 2, and the West 15 feet of Lot 1, in Block 1, MIRAMAR, according to the Plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 5, at Page 4, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida. PARCEL 2: Folio # 01-3231-003-0040/01-3231-003-0050 Lots 3, 4, 5 and that portion of Lot 7 lying East of the East right-of-way line of Biscayne Boulevard, Block 1, MIRAMAR, according to the Plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 5, at Page 4, of the Public Records of Miami - Dade County, Florida. PARCEL 3: Folio # 01-3231-001-0011 Lot 1, CORAL PARK, less the West 161.25 feet thereof, according to the Plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 2, at Page 66, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida. PARCEL 4: Folio # 01-3231-001-0010 The West 161.25 feet of Lot 1, CORAL PARK, according to the Plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 2, at Page 66, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida. PARCEL 5: Folio # 01-3231-001-0020 Lot 2, CORAL PARK, according to the Plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 2, at Page 66, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida. PARCEL 6: Folio # 01-3231-001-0030 The East 50 feet of Lot 3, CORAL PARK, according to the Plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 2, at Page 66, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida. PARCEL 7: Folio # 01-3231-001-0040/01-3231-001-0070101-3231-001-0100 Lot 3, less the East 50 feet thereof; Lots 5, 7 and that portion of Lot 11 lying East of the East right-of-way line of Biscayne Boulevard, CORAL PARK, according to the Plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 2, at Page 66, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida. PARCEL 8: Folio # 01-3231-002-0010 Lots 9A and 9B of a RESUBDIVISION OF LOTS 9, 15 AND 17 TO 22, INCLUSIVE, OF CORAL PARK, according to the Plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 4, at Page 106, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida. Page I of 5 Submitted Into tie public record In connection with Item ' on &fid!. Walter Foeman City Clerk 0 9 PARCEL 9: Folio # None Available That parcel of land described as follows: Beginning at a point on the South boundary line of Lot 11, CORAL PARK, as recorded in Plat Book 2, at Page 66, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida, where said South line intersects the East boundary line of Biscayne Boulevard, said point being 69.64 feet, more or less, South of the North boundary line of said Lot 11; Thence run Easterly and Southeasterly along the said South boundary line of Lot 11 and the South boundary line of Lots 913 and 9A of a RESUBDIVISION OF LOTS 9,15 AND 17 TO 22, INCLUSIVE, OF CORAL PARK, according to the Plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 4, at Page_106, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida, and along the South boundary line of Lot 7 of aforesaid CORAL PARK, 152.4 feet more or less, to a point 30.9 feet, more or less, Southeasterly from the Southwesterly corner of said Lot 7; Thence run West 148.9 feet, more or less, to the East boundary line of said Biscayne Boulevard; Thence run North along the said East boundary line of Biscayne Boulevard 26,0 feet, more or less, to the POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL 10: Folio # 01-3231-001-0110 The West 52 feet of Lot 8, all of Lot 10, and that portion of Lot 12 lying East of the East right-of-way line of Biscayne Boulevard, CORAL PARK, according to the Plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 2, at Page 66, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida; LESS the following described parcel of land, to -wit: Beginning at the Northeasterly corner of the West 52 feet of Lot 8, CORAL PARK, as recorded in Plat Book 2, at Page 66, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade county, Florida; thence run Northwesterly along the Northerly boundary lines of Lots 8, 10 and 12 of the aforesaid CORAL PARK 147 feet, more or less, to a point on the East boundary line of Biscayne Boulevard; thence run South along the said East boundary line of Biscayne Boulevard 26.5 feet, more or less, to a point 79.08 feet, more or less, North of the South boundary line of said Lot 12; thence run East, making a deflecting angle of 90000'00" to the left with the said last described course through said Lots 12, 10 and 8, respectively, 144 feet, more or less, to the POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL 11: Folio # 01-3231-001-0050 The West 21 feet and 4 inches of Lot 4 and the East 28 feet and 8 inches of Lot 6, CORAL PARK, according to the Plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 2, at Page 66, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida. PARCEL 12: Folio # 01-33231-001-0060 The East 60 feet of Lot 4, CORAL PARK, according to the Plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 2, at Page 66, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida. Page 2of5 Submitted Into ttto public Y ., record in connecglon with lte� on/- Waiter Foeman :w Clty r%lc r&, PARCEL 13: Folio # 01-3231-001-0090 The West 10 feet of Lot 6 and the East 40 feet of Lot 8, CORAL PARK, according to the Plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 2, at Page 66, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida. PARCEL 14: Folio # 01-3231-001-0080 The East 107.4 feet of Lot 6, less the East 28 feet 8 inches, CORAL PARK, according to the Plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 2, at Page 66, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida. PARCEL 15: Folio # 01-3230-032-0200 The East 100.00 feet of Lots 1 and 2, Block 4, AMENDED PLAT OF BAYSIDE PARK, according to the Plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 2, at Page 40, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida. PARCEL 16: Folio # 01-3230-032-0210 The West 50.00 feet of Lots 1 and 2 and all of Lot 3, Block 4, AMENDED PLAT OF BAYSIDE PARK, according to the Plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 2, at Page 40, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida. PARCEL 17: Folio # 01-3230-032-0230 Lot 6, and the West '/z of Lot 5, in Block 4, AMENDED PLAT OF BAYSIDE PARK, according to the Plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 2, at Page 40, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida. PARCEL 18: Folio # 01-3230-320-0240 Lot 7 and the East %z of Lot 8, in Block 4, BAYSIDE PARK, according to the Plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 2, at Page 40, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida. PARCEL 19: Folio # 01-3230-032-0270 The West half of Lot 8, all of Lot 9, and Lot 10 LESS that part described as follows: Begin at the Northwest corner of Lot 10, thence run East along the North line of Lot 10 a distance of 1.39 feet to a point; thence Southwesterly to a point on the South line of said Lot 10 located at a distance of 0.44 feet from the Southwest corner of said Lot 10; thence West along the said South Iine to the Southwest corner of said Lot 10; thence North along the West line of said Lot 10 to the POINT OF BEGINNING. All in Block 4, BAYSIDE PARK, according to the Plat thereof, recorded in Plat Book 2, at Page 40, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida Page 3 of 5 � u Into c p/!3 ivy "f.. Ci 1 °'li 4Ty1.�9Item a • 0 .! -- ALSO KNOWN AS -- PARCEL 1: A parcel of land being Lots 1, 2 and 3 in Block 4 of AMENDED PLAT OF BAYSIDE PARK as recorded in Plat Book 2 at page 40 of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows: BEGIN at the northeast corner of said Lot 2; thence N89°57'30"W along the north line of said Lots 2 and 3 for 199.99 feet; thence S00°03'21 "W along the west line of said Lot 3 for 104.68 feet; thence S89°59'04"E along the south line of said Lots 3 and 1 for 19993 feet; thence N00' 05'16"E along the cast line of said Lots 1 and 2 for 104.59 feet to the Point of Beginning (containing 0.480 acre more or less). PARCEL2: A parcel of land being the west one-half (W %:) of Lot 5, all of Lots 6,7,8,9 and a portion of Lot 10 all in Block 4 of AMENDED PLAT OF BAYSIDE PARK as recorded in Plat Book 2 -at page 40 of the Public Records of Miami - Dade County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows: BEGIN at the northeast corner of said west one-half (W %) of Lot 5; thence N89°57'30"W along north line of said Lots 5,6,7,8,9 and Lot 10 for 273.59 feet to a point on the east right of way line of Biscayne Boulevard as shown on RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION NE 20th ST. BETWEEN NE 2nd AVENUE & BISCAYNE BAY, recorded in Plat Book 75 at page 16; thence S00°30'36"W along said east right of way line of Biscayne Boulevard for 104.84 feet; thence S89°59'04"E along the south line of said Block 4 for 274.45 feet; thence N00°02'27"E along the east line of said west one-half (W1/2) of Lot 5 for 104.71 feet to the Point of Beginning (containing 0.659 acre more or less). PARCEL 3: A parcel of land being a portion of Lots 1,3,5,7,11 and a portion of the vacated right-of-way of Coral Drive, all of CORAL PARK as recorded in Plat Book 2 at page 66 of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida and Lots 9A and 98 of RESUBDIVISION OF LOTS 9,15 AND 17 TO 22, INCLUSIVE, OF CORAL PARK as recorded in Plat Book 4 at page 106 of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows; BEGIN at the northeast corner of said Lot 1; thence N89° 59'04"W along the north line of said CORAL PARK and said RESUBDIVISION OF LOTS 9,15 AND 17 TO 22, INCLUSIVE, OF CORAL PARK for 593.08 feet; thence S00°30'36"W along the east right-of-way line of Biscayne Boulevard as shown on RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION NE 20th ST. BETWEEN NE 2nd AVENUE & BISCAYNE BAY, recorded in Plat Book 75 at page 16 of Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida for 95.51 feet; the following thirteen (13) courses being along the northerly line of said Plat Book 75 at page 16; (1) thence S89°29124"E for 148.37 feet; (2) thence S76035'22"E for 60.90 feet to a point of curvature; (3) thence southeasterly along a 375.50 foot radius curve leading to the left through a central angle of 09°42'34" for an are distance of 63.63 feet to a point of compound curvature; (4) thence northeasterly along a 17.70 foot radius curve leading to the left through a central angle of 53°48'06" for on arc distance of 16.62 feet to a point of tangency, (5) thence N39053057"E for 21.80 feet to a point of curvature; (6) thence northeasterly along a 63.50 foot radius curve leading to the right through a central angle of 66°48'28" for on are distance of 74.04 feet to a point of tangency, (7) thence S73 ° 17'34"E for 22.91 feet to a point of curvature; (8) thence southeasterly along a 176.01 foot radius curve leading to the left through a central angle of 16'11'50" for and arc distance of 49.76 feet to a point of compound curvature; (9) thence easterly along a 464.00 foot radius curve leading to the left through a central angle of 08°59'59" for on arc distance of 72.88 feet to a point of compound curvature; (10) thence northeasterly along a 143.70 foot radius curve leading to the left through a central angle of 08'17'05" for on are distance of 20.78 feet to a point of reverse curvature; (11) thence northeasterly along a 143.70 foot radius curve leading to the right through a central angle of 05°46'53" for on are distance of 14.50 feet to a point of compound curvature; (12) thence easterly along a 111.40 foot radius curve leading to the right through a central angle of 22°08'02" for an are Page 4 of 5 Submitted into the public record in connection with item �Z- �, on Waiter Foeman City Clerk distance of 43.03 feet to a point of compound curvature; (13) thence southeasterly along a 37.50 foot radius curve leading to the right through a central angle of 25°15'42" for an arc distance of 16.53 feet; thence N05°18'54"W along the east line of said Lot 1 for 85.08 feet to the Point of Beginning (containing 1,2113 acres more or less), PARCEL 4 A parcel of land being a portion of Lots 2,4,6,8, 10 and 12 of CORAL PARK as recorded in Plat Book 2 at page 66 of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida and a portion of Lots 1 and 7 along with all of Lots 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 of Block 1 in MIRAMAR as recorded in Plat Book 5 at page 4 of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows: BEGIN at the southeast corner of said Lot 2 of CORAL PARK; thence N89°59'04"W along the south line of said Lot 2 and Lot 4 of CORAL PARK (also being the north line of said Lot 1 in Block l of MIRAMAR) for 309.27 feet; thence S00° 30'35"W along the east line of the west 15.00 feet of said Lut 1 of Block 1 in MIRAMAR for 104.83 feet; thence S89059'36"W along the south line of said Block 1 in MIRAMAR for 305.09 feet, thence NO0°30'36"E along the east right-of-way line of Biscayne Boulevard as shown in RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION NE 20th ST. BETWEEN NE 2nd AVENUE & BISCAYNE BAY, as recorded in Plat Book 75 at page 16 of the said Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida, for 184.13 feet; the following twelve (12) courses being along the south line of said RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION NE 20th ST. BETWEEN NE 2nd AVENUE & BISCAYNE BAY, according to the Plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 75 at page 16 of the said Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida; (1) thence S89°29'24"E for 144.53 feet; (2) thence S76°35'22"E for 57.06 feet to a point of curvature; (3) thence southeasterly along a 409.50 foot radius curve leading to the left through a central angle of 09'42'34" for an are distance of 69.39 feet to a point of compound curvature, (4) thence northeasterly along a 51.70 foot radius curve leading to the left through a central angle of 53'48'06" for on are distance of 48.55 feet to a point of tangency. (5) thence N39°53'57"E for 21.80 feet to a point of curvature; (6) thence northeasterly along a 29.50 foot radius curve leading to the right through a central angle of 66°48'28" for an arc distance of 34.40 feet to a point of a tangency, (7) thence S73° 17'34"E for 22.91 feet to a point of curvature; (8) thence southeasterly along a 210.01 foot radius curve leading to the left through a central angle of 16'11'50" for an are distance of 59.37 feet to a point of compound curvature; (9) thence easterly along a 498.00 foot radius curve leading to the left through a central angle of 08°59'59" for an are distance of 78.22 feet to a point of reverse curvature; (10) thence southeasterly along a 39.00 foot radius curve leading to the right through a central angle of 59005'51" for on are distance of 40.23 feet to a point of reverse curvature; (11) thence southeasterly along a 39.00 foot radius curve leading to the left through a central angle. of 39°28'00" for an arc distance of 26.86 feet to a point of compound curvature; (12) thence easterly along a 139.00 foot radius curve leading to the left through a central angle of 14'20'08" for on are distance of 34.78 feet; thence S05° 18'54"E along the east line of said Lot 2 of CORAL PARK for 59.52 feet to the Point of Beginning (containing 1.807 acres more or less). Page 5 of 5 il�JiCiGg�od ata 4. s IfInKof 0 �'A_-Ws PROPERTY OWNED CITY OF MIAMI EXIBIT "B"6 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A parcel of land being a portion NE 20th Street as shown on the plat entitled RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION, N.E. •20TH STREET BETWEEN N.E. 2ND AVE & BISCAYNE BAY, as recorded in Piot Book 75 at Page 16 of the Public Records of Miami-Dode County, Florida the some being that portion of N.E. 20th Street lying between Biscayne Boulevard (U.S. Highway #1) and North Bayshore Drive being more particuroly described as follows: Begin at the N.E. Carner of the intersection of N.E. 20th Street and Biscayne Boulevard as shown on the above said Plot of N.E. 20th STREET, the next 13 courses being along the north line of N.E. 20th Street, (1) thence S89'29'24"E for 148.37 feet, (2) thence S76'35'22"E for 60.90 feet to o point of curvature (3) thence southeasterly along a 375.50 foot radius curve leading to the left through a central angle of 09'42'34" for on arc distance of 63.63 feet to a point of compound curvature; (4) thence northeasterly along a 17.70 foot radius curve leading to the left through o central angle of 53'48'06" for an arc distance of 16.62 feet to a point of tangency; (5) thence N39'53'57"E for 21.80 feet to a point of curvature; (6) thence northeasterly along a 63.50 foot radius curve leading to the right through a central angle of 66'48'28" for an arc distance of 74.04 feet to o point of tangency; (7) thence $73'17'34"E for 22.91 feet to a point of curvature; (8) thence southeasterly along a 176.01 foot radius curve leading to the left through a central angle of 16'11'50" for and arc distance of 49.76 feet to a point of compound curvature; (9) thence easterly along a 464.00 foot radius curve leading to the left through a central angle of 0859'59" for on are distance of 72.88 feel to a point of compound curvature; (10) thence northeasterly along a 143.70 foot radius curve leading to the left through a central angle of 08'17'03" for an arc distance of 20.78 feet to a point of reverse curvature; (11) thence northeasterly along a 143.70 foot radius curve leading to the right through a central angle of 0646'53" for on arc distance of 14.50 feet to a point of compound curvature; (12) thence easterly along a 111.40 foot radius curve leading to the right through a central angle of 22'08'02" for an arc distance of 43.03 feet to a point of compound curvature; (13) thence southeasterly along a 37.50 foot radius curve leading to the right through a central angle of 25'15'42" for on arc distance of 16.53 feet; thence S05'18'54"E for 65.00 feel to a paint on o circular curve whose radius point bears NO3'11'42"W, the next (12) courses being along the south right -of way line of N.E. 20th Street; (1) thence northwesterly along a 139.00 foot radius curve leading to the right through a central angle of 14'20'08" for arc of 34.78 feet to a point of compound curvature; (2) thence westerly along a 39.00 foot radius curve leading to the right through a central angle of 39'28'00" for an arc of 26.86 feet to a point of reverse curvature; (3) thence westerly along a 39.00 foot radius curve leading to the left through central angle 59'05'52" for on arc distance 40.23 feet to o point of reverse curvature. (4) thence westerly along .a 498.00 foot radius curve leading to the right through a central angle of 08'59'59" for an arc distance of 78.22 feet to a point of compound curvature; (5) thence westerly along a 210.01 foot radius curve leading to the right through central ongle of 16'11 1'50" for on arc distance of 59.37 feel to a point of tongency; (6) thence N73'17'34"W for 22.91 feet to a point of curvature; (7)thence southwesterly along a 29.50 foot radius curve leading to the left through a central angle of 66'48'28" for on arc distance of 34.40 feet to a point of tongency; (8) thence S39'53'57"W for 21.80 feet to o point of curvature; (9) thence southwesterly along a 51.70 foot radius curve leading to the right through a central angle of 53.48'06" for arc of 48.55 feet to a point of compound curvature; (11) thence westerly along a 409.50 foot radius curve leading to the right through a central angle of 09' 42'33" for an arc of 69.39 feet to a point of tangency; (12) thence N 76'35'22" W for 57.06 feet; thence N89'29'24"W for 144.53 feet to a point on the east right right-of-way line of Biscayne Boulevard (U.S. Highway #1); thence N00'30'36"E along said east right-of-way line for 34.00 feet to the Point of Beginning. • Submittod into the public record In connection with item / on Wafter Foemen` City Clerk L� Grantee's Tax ldentltication No.: Property Appraiser's Folio No,: c 194- f 3FG 13 . 13 0 0OR605969 2000 DEC 18 lit DMTPDEE 53,100,00 Sherr 39,825 ffMVEY RLIVIN: CLERK AADS COUNTYr ' SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED .i, THIS SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED (this "P]_eed') is made as of tate 5*ay of December, 2000, from HORN BLAWER TRUST COMPANY N.V., a Netherlands Antilles J.. 1.' corporation (Mor') Raving a mailing address of c/o Zack Kosnitzky, P.A., 100 S.E. Second Street, Suite 2$00, Miami, Florida 33131, to FINGER BISCAYNE, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, the mailing address of which is 99 Detering, Suite 200, Hotiston, Texas 77007 WITNL_SS—ETH: THAT Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten and No/l Oil Dollars ($10.00), and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, by these presents does grant, bargain and sell unto Grantee, and Grantee's successors and assigns forever, all the right, title, interest, claim and demand that Grantor has or may have in and to the following teal property described on &bihit A. together with all buildings and improvements thereon (collectively, the "JAnn "Annlocated and situate in the County of Miami -Dade and State of Mim tfed into the f8ead in 0MOC110n Wth on s• Whiter Foeman J rw .Li. -L, 1! 3 ' T111$ la�tnrment eparcd 8Sr: ry,� ltoberl A.:Ma�tovr, Esq. :<'" %ack Kosnitzkq, P.A. FPA 10O.S:E°2ii ;3tiregt, Suite 29M f.. ' Miorni Florida 33131 L� Grantee's Tax ldentltication No.: Property Appraiser's Folio No,: c 194- f 3FG 13 . 13 0 0OR605969 2000 DEC 18 lit DMTPDEE 53,100,00 Sherr 39,825 ffMVEY RLIVIN: CLERK AADS COUNTYr ' SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED .i, THIS SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED (this "P]_eed') is made as of tate 5*ay of December, 2000, from HORN BLAWER TRUST COMPANY N.V., a Netherlands Antilles J.. 1.' corporation (Mor') Raving a mailing address of c/o Zack Kosnitzky, P.A., 100 S.E. Second Street, Suite 2$00, Miami, Florida 33131, to FINGER BISCAYNE, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, the mailing address of which is 99 Detering, Suite 200, Hotiston, Texas 77007 WITNL_SS—ETH: THAT Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten and No/l Oil Dollars ($10.00), and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, by these presents does grant, bargain and sell unto Grantee, and Grantee's successors and assigns forever, all the right, title, interest, claim and demand that Grantor has or may have in and to the following teal property described on &bihit A. together with all buildings and improvements thereon (collectively, the "JAnn "Annlocated and situate in the County of Miami -Dade and State of Mim tfed into the f8ead in 0MOC110n Wth on s• Whiter Foeman J rw .Li. -L, 1! 3 • • 0 The Land is conveyed subject to the matters set forth on " " attached hamto and made a part hereof Grantor does hereby warrant, and will defend, the title to the Land hereby conveyed, subject as aforesaid, against the lawful claims of all persons claiming by, through or under Grantor, but none other. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor has caused these presents to be executed and its seat to be affixed the day and year first above written, HORN BLOWER TRUST COMPANY'N.V., a Netherlands Antilles corporation Charles hfiyer, Man ag ng hector {SEAL) STATE OF FLORIDA ) } SS.: COUNTY OF MIAMI -DARE ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this /S Y.#i day of December, 2004, by CHARLES MAYER as Managing Director of HORN BLOWER TRUST COMPANY N.V., a Netherlands Antilles corporations, who is personally Known to me or who produce as i entt nationon b �f of the corporation. My commission expires: #117576 A 17!612000 -Moulffll e >"47 a NOTARY PUBLIC, State rnof Florida at Large Print Nemo: rwwswlM.s,�n in" SUbtit@tted into the laubilic rdWgJn COnnection with �`{ on ' s• Wafter F09man City Clone • • • 13[5 smsw ;!" PAROL 1. 0 A parcel of land being Lots 1, 2 and 3 in Block 4 of AMENDED PLAT OF BAYSIDE PARK as esco�rded in Plat Book 2, ai: Page 40, of the Public Rercoxda of Miami -Dade. County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows: BEGIN at the Northeast corner of said Lot 2; theme, Worth 09 degrees 57 minutes 30 seconds Kest along the Noxth line of said hots 2 and 3 for 199.99 tests thence South 00 degrees 03 minutes 21 secoAds West along the went line of said Lot 3 for 1,04.68 feet; thence South. 69 degrees S9 Udnutee 04 seconds Vast along the south line -of maid Lots 3 and I for 199.93 ,fact; thence Horth 00 degrees OS MLUutes 16 seconds East along the East line {:if said Lots 1 and 2 for 104.59 feet to the Point of Beginning. PARCEL 2: A parcel of land being the West ane-haslf (W 1/2) of Lot 5, all of Lot$ 6, 7, 8, 9 Arad 4 portiou of Lot 10, all 3n Block 4 of AW.NDED PLAT OF SAYSIDE PARK as recorded in Plat .Book 2, at Page 40, of the Public Records of Mixmi-Dade County, F102*ida, being more pa.rki.cularl.y described as follows: BHGIN at the Northeast corner of isaid West one-half (W i/2) of yet 5; thence North 89 degrees 57 minutes 30 seconds West along North line of said Lots 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and Lot 10 fo:: 273.59 feet to a Point an the East right--of-way lige of Biscayne Boulevard as shown on RIC#AT-w-WAY ACS iarTIoN BE 20th ST. BVM124 HE 2nd AVENUE 6 BISCAY DAY, recorded in Plat Book 75 at Page 16; thence South 00 degrees 30 minutes 36 seconds West along said East" right -of -tray "Aft of Biscayne` Boulevard for 104.84 feet; then --e South 89 degrees S9 minutes 04 seconds $cat along the South line :)f said Block 4 for 274.45 feet; thence: North 00 degrees 02 minutes 27 seconds East along the. East litre of said West one-half ;W 1/2) of Lot 5 for 104.71 teak to. the Point of Beginning. PARCEL 3: A parcel of land being a portion of Lots k,, 3, 5, ), 11 and a Portion of the vacated right-of-way of Coral trive, all of CC)M PARK, as recorded in plat Book 2, at Page 66, of the Public Records Of - Miami -Dade County, Florida and Lots 9A and !in of VjL"BDIVYSiON OF LOTS 9, 15 .AND 17 TO 22, MR=SIVE. OF CORAL. PARK, as recorded in Plat Book 4, at Page 106, of the Public- Records of Minati-Dade County, Florida, being more particularly descr, brad as follows BEGIN at the Northeast corner of said Lot 1; thence North 89 Submitted into the public recon m connection with item 'I onlam Walter Foernan City Clerk E • • L' Ll 'il!'i` •]'l�'�1•�i'Anfnn �l`.r� l�II� a deg?" ...55i mi 14;3 ors . 04 Oe RncW, wT ipt along the b'o2. line of said cax.::.Ac .aa'.`.d:.ssxrr oP Logs, 15 AM 17 TOa2, 1NQ,jTB, , qF' ¢ A , : AR ; s Qat: `59 pe fcet; ths=s Sot'tth 00 degrees 30 `Yunu$ : 36.eon `W:t" _,]?A9 the Bast richt-of-way lies of 'a:i 73 z3Ca Q., le 9%' �3 ��-QF'-WAY A CQU4SIT10N HE 20th ST, Y� � ...,...: ':.. � BRTNUAN M 2nd 'AV E A OXOM '$AY. recorded Irk Plat Book 75, at Pae 15, of the ' 3 Pt1ic Retards of Miami- de Gaunty, Florida for 95.57. feet; the, folloviny tbirtesn (13) coursers beings along the Northerly line of said Plat Book 75 at )?ege 16: :1j thence South 89 degrses 29 minutes 24 seconds East for 146.37 feet; (2) thence South 76 degX608 35 minutes 22 seconds East fctir. 60.90 feet to a Point of curvature; (3) thence Southeasterly along a 375.50 foot radius curve leaiding to the left through a central angle of 09 degrees 42- minutes 34 seconds for an arc distance of 63.63 feat to CL Port of compound curvature; (4) thence Nora:heasterly along a 17.70 fact ra0us carve leading to the left tiu:+ctsgh a central angle of 53 degrees 48 minutes 06 seconds for an arc distance of 16.62 feet to a point of tangency; (5) thence North 39 degrees 53 minutes 57 seoondar East for 21.80 feet to a point of cuavuture, (6) thence Northeas terly along a 63 . SO foot radius curve ;trading to the right through a central angle of 66 degreea 48 mi nutel::28 8ecattd8 for an arc di.i3tance of 74.04 feet to a point of tango:nc•t: (7) thence south t` 73 degrees 1.7 minutes 34 seconds East for 22.91 feet to a point of curvature; (8) thence Southeasterly along a %76.01 foot radius curves leading to the left through a central anq%e of 16 minutes SO seconds for an arc distance of 49.76 feat: to gees 11 aint of otapound curvature (9) trhe uce Easterly along a 464.00 footradiuscurve leading to the left through a central ".Le of 08 degrees 59 minutes 59 08cOnds for an arc distances of 72.88 feet to as< point of cnatpaund curvature; (10) thence Northeasterly clang a 143.70 foot radius curve leading to the left through a central angle of oe degrraeo 17 minutes OS ;seconds for an arc distan..a of 20 78 feet t a point: of reverse curvatures (11) thence Northeasterly aalong a 143.70 foot: radius curvre leading to the right through a central angle of 05 degrees 46 minutes 53 seconds for an arc distance of 14.50 Leet to a point: of compound curvature : (12) ;hours Easterly along a 7.11.40 foot radius curve leading to tae right through a central aAgle of 22 degrees 08 minutes 02 seconds for an arc distance of 43.03 fast to a Point of campautid curvature; (13) thence Southeasterly along a 37.50 foot radius curve leading to the right through a central angle of 25 degrees 15 Minutes 42 addonds for an arc distance of 16.53 feet; thence North OS degrees 16 minute8 54 seconds West along the East: line of said Lot 1 for 85.08 £meat: to the Point of Beginning. PARCEL 4 s A 'Parcel of land being a portion of Lotus 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 of CORAL PARK an recorded in plat Hook 2, at page 66, of the Public Records of Miami -bade county, Florida and a por.t:ion of Lots i and 7 along with all ot; Lots 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6, of 6Lock 1, in MIRAM11ii, as: recorded in plat Hook 5, at Page 4, of the public Records of Miami. --Dade County, Florida, being more part.i ct: Early described as fallow8: Submitted into the public record In connec ®n with item '& / an Lo Falter Foeman City Clerk • • • RUE:19413M131l BEGIN at the Southeast corner of said Lot 2 of [ORAL PARK; thence North 89 degrees 59 minutes 04 seconds West along the South line of staid Lot 2 and Lot 4 of CORAL PARK (also being the North line of said Lot I in Block I of MIRAMAR] for 309.27 feet.; thence south 00 degrees 30 minutes 35 seconds West along the East: line of the West 15.00 feet of said Lot I of Block I, in MIRAMAR, Eor 104.83 feet; thence South 89 degrees 59 minutes 36 seconds Wet;t along the South line of said Block 1 in MIRAMAR for 305.09 feet; thence North 00 degrees 30 minutes 36 seconds East along the East right-of-way lime Of Biscayne Boulevard as shown in RIGHT -OF --WAY A(VUISITION ME 20th ST. BETWSEN TIE 2nd AVEMM & BISCAAYNE SA'Y', as recorded in Plat Book 75, at page 16, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida. for 184.13 feet; the following twelve .12) courses being along the South line of said RIMr OF WAY ACQUIJ;XTION NE 20th ST. BETWEEN NE 2nd AVEMM & BISCAYNf: BAX, according to the Plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 75, at Page 16, of the public Records of Miami. -Dade County, Florida; (1) thence South 89 3egrues 29 minutes 24 seconds East~ for 144.53 feet; (2) thence South 76 degrees 35 minutest 22 seconds East for 57.66 feet to a point of curvature; (3) thence Southe"terly along a 409.50 foot raciiur. curve leading to the left through a central angle of 09 degtcvr t 42 minutes 34 Seconds for an arc distance of 69.39 feet to a point of compound Curvature; (4) thence Northeasterly along a 51.70 foot radi'UH curve leading to the left through a central angle of 53 degrees 48 minutea 06 seconds for an arc distance of 48.55 feet to a point of tangency; (5) thence North 39 degrees 53 minutea 57 seconds East for 21.80 feet to a point of curvature; (6) th-tnce Northeasterly along a 29.50 foot radius curve leading to the right through a central angle of 66 degrees 48 minutes 28 st:rcuads for ark arc distance of 34.40 feet to a point of tangency; (7) thence South 73 degrees 11 minutes 34 seconds East for 22.91 fee -it to a point of curvature; (8) thence Southeasterly along a 21G.0I foot radius ourve leading to the left through a central angle of 16 degrees 11 minutes 50 seconds for an arc distance of 59.37 feet to a point of compound curvature; (9) thence Easterly along a. 498.00 hoot radius curve leading to the left through a central ang]e of 09 degrees 59 minutes 59 seconds for an arc distance of 76.22 feet to a point of reverse curvature, (101 thence Southeasterly along a 39.00 foc,t radius curve leading to the right through a cc:ttt ra,l angle of 59 degrees OS minutes 51 seconds for an arc distance of 40.23 feet to a point of reverse curvature; (11) thence Sov_heasterl.y along a 39.00 foot radius curve leading to the left t:hroizyl�vt a central angle of 39 degrees 28 minutes 00 se,conde for an arc distance of 26.66 feet to a point of compound curvature; (12) thence Easterly along a 139.00 foot radius curve leading to the left through a central angle of 14 degrees 20 minutes 08 seconds for art arc distance of 34.78 feet= thence South 05 degrees 18 minutes 54 seconds East +;Long the East line of said I. "t: 2 oz CORMA PARD for 53.52 feet to the Point of Beginning. Submitted into thc: pu0jC record In connection with Item AZ-/ on •z .0/ J � a � .i Walter Foeman City Clerk .3,. 1. Dedications and Restrictions as shown on the Plat ofBAYSIDE PARK, recorded in Plat Book 2, at Page 23. 2, Dedications and Restrictions as shown on the AMENDED PLAT OF BAYSIDE PARK, recorded in Plat Book 2, q at Page 40. 3, Dedications, Easements and Restrictions as shown on the Plat of CORAL PARK, recorded in Plat Book 2, at Page 66. 4. Dedications as shown on the Plat of RESUBDIVISION OF LOTS 9,15 AND 17 TO 22, INCLUSIVE, OF CORAL PARK, recorded in Plat Book 4, at Page 106. 5. Dedications and Restrictions as shown on the Plat of MIRAMAR, recorded in Plat Book S. at Page 4, 6. RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION PLAT filed in Plat Book 75, at Page Ib, 7, Umments reserved in Deeds filed in Deed Book 133, at Page 375, Deed Book 160, at Page 424, Deed Hook 171, at Page 198, Decd Book 174, Page 83, Deed Book 174, Page 347, Deed Book 176, Page 384, Deed Book 179, Page 424 and Deed Rook 204, Page 14 (Afl'" Lots in Miramar). 8, Grant of Basement fled in Deed Book 3863.4t Page 397 (Affects Lot 2 in Coral Park). 9, Grunt of Easement f led in Deed Book 3888, at Page 484 (Affects Lot l in Coral Park). 10. Right -of -Way Easement riled in Official Records Book 8140, at Page 472 (Affects Lot 4 in Coral Park). 11. Any assessments for taxes levied pursuant to Section 193,092 Fla. Statutes with respect only to the following dewribcd property: Beginning at a point on the South boundary line of Lot 11, CORAL PARK, as recorded in Plat Book 2, at Page 66, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida, where said South line intersects the East boundary line ,F of Biscayne Boulevard. Thence run Easterly and Southeasterly along the said South boundary line of Lot I I and the South boundary line of Lots 9B and 9A of a RESUBDMSION OF LOTS 9,15 AND 17 TO 22, INCLUSIVE, OF CORAL PARK, as recorded in Plat Book 4, at Page 106, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida, and along the South bottridary line of Lot 7 of aforesaid CORAL PARK 152.4 feet, more or less, to a point on the Northerly riItt of way tine of N.E. 2e Street as shown on Plat known as RIGHT-O&WAY ACQUISITION NE W ST. BETWEEN NE 2ND AVENUE & BISCAYNE BAY, recorded in Plat Book 75, at Page 16. Thence run Westerly along said Northerly right of way line of N.E. 2e Street 148.37 feet, more or less, to the East boundary line of said Biscayne Boulevard. Thence tort Northerly along the said East boundary line of Biscaync Boulevard 26.0 feet, more or less, to the Point of Beginning. 12. Taxes and assessments for the year 2001 and subsequent years. STATE OF FLORID , COUNTY OF DADE *�pCOY au, n MOPI CNLIrN00Na4S" 1 HEREBY CIRMY that the lorege g is a Uue„and correct covf (he 4� p p, �, riopaa original an lilt in this ollice. ( � D 20 C1 v ' MRNIN HARVEY RUVIN, CLERKrL url Goons "� y u xrcoat► t7oc.M:117453v t1 �f jgjn CGFCou. ,+.� N Submitted into the public record In connection with Itelm'�. on /0-45- 0/ Walter Foeman j 1 " City Clerk 0 ��r e -ft L.J 60 0 r�_ 1 �J r� 0 i DIRECTORY OF PROJECT PRINCIPALS Owner/Developer: Finger Biscayne LLC c/o The Finger Companies 99 Detering, Suite 200 Houston, TX 77007 Phone: (713) 864-3313 Fax: (713) 880-0422 Marvy Finger Jason Robertson Architect: Cohen Friedman Bncinosa 8085 N.W. 155 Street _ Miami Lakes, FL 33016 Phone: (305) 826-3999 Fax: (305)826-4155 Stuart Cohen Landscape Architect: Bradshaw Gill & Associates 4337 Seagrape Drive Lauderdale by the Sea, FL 33308 Phone: (305) 944-7245 Fax: (954) 772-8417 Taft Bradshaw Traffic: David Plummer & Associates 1750 Ponce De Leon Coral Gables, FL 33134 Phone; (305) 447-0900 Fax: (305) 444-4986 Economist: Sharpton Brunson & Company 1 S.E. 3.d Avenue Suite 2100 Miami, FL 33131 Telephone: (305) 374-1574 Fax: (305) 372-8161 Darryl Sharpton Legal: Bilzin Sumberg Dunn Price & Axelrod 2500 First Union Financial Center 200 South Biscayne Boulevard Miami, Florida 33131-2336 Telephone: (305) 374-7580 Fax: (305)374-7593 A. Vicky Garcia -Toledo, Esq. Submitted into the public record in connection with Item.. on •2s(%, 1 Walter Foeman City Clerk 0 • 01 . SITE: FINGER DEVELOPMENT BICAYNE BOULEVARD BETWEEN NE IM STREET AND 20TH TERRACE, MIAMI, FLORIDA. FOR MORE DETAIL SEE EXHTAIT "A" UNDER ARTICLE I, TAB A. 2. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SEE MME31T "A" UNDER ARTICLE I TAB B. 3. SITE ZONING: sn—a 4. PERMITTED USES: THE PERMITTED USES ARE, SUT NOT LWTED TO MULTIPLE FAM LY Bi7t INGS. PROPOSED: RESIDENTIAL 437 UNITS COMMERCIAL 19,400 S.F. 5. LOT AREA GRASS: 283,332 S.F. (8.504 ACRES) NET: 203,705 S.F. (4.676 ACRES) LOT COVERAGE: 46.2% S. BUILDING FOOTPRINT APARMENT BUILDINGS 77,424 S.F. PARKING GARAGE 53,446 S.F. TOTAL 130,870 S.F. A � Y_ MAX, PERMITTED: F.A.R. = SEVEN AND TWO-TENTHS (7.2) X GROSS IAT AREA (7.2) X 263,332 S.F. = 2,089.990 S.F. PROPOSED: F.A.R. - 580.282 S.F. (2.53) S. DENSITY MAX. PERMITTED: 500 UNIT'S PER ACRE 500 X 8.504 ACRES = 3252 UNM PROPOSED: 437 UNrrS (87.19 UNITS/ACRE) Submitted into the public record In connection with Item L on d• �4 Wafter Foeman City Clerk 0 0 9. OPEN SPACE MIN, REQUIRED: 1 S -F, PER 10 S.F. OF RESIDENTIAL FLOOR AREA 1/10 X 560,88$ S.F. 56.088 S.F. PROPOSED: 64,380 S.F. 10. SETBACKS REQUIRED: FRONT (BISCAYNE BLVD) 0' MIN TO 28' Ma. TO REAR OF ARCADE AT STREET LEVEL 15' ABOVE STREET -LEVEL SIDE STREET 5' NORTH HAYSHORE DRIVE 5' NO MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR ALL INTERIOR YARDS (SIDE, REAR, & SPECIAL,) PROPOSED: FRONT (HFSCAYNE BLVD) 15' TO REAR OF ARCADE AT STREET LEVEL 15' ABOVE STREET LEVEL SIDE STREET 5' NORTH BAYSHORE DRIVE 5' NO MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR .ALL INTERIOR YARDS (SIDE, REAR, & SPECIAL) 1. PARKING: MIN. REQUIRED: (1 SPACE PER UNIT) + (1 SPACE PER 1000 S.F. DF RETAIL) 437 + 18.400 S.F.11000 457 SPACES PROPOSED: 701 SPACES* 'INCLUDES 15 HANDICAPPED SPACES (RESIDENTIAL RATIO 1.55 PER UNIT) 12. OFFSTREET LOADING MIN, REQLTn=: (4) BERTHS ® 12' WIDE X a5' LONG (1) BERTH ® 12' WIDE X 55' LONG PROPOSED: (4) BERTHS 0 12' WIDE X 35' KONG (1) BERM ® 12' WIDE X 55' LONG 13. MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT ALLOWED. UNLIMITED PROVIDED: 157'-0" TOWER kMIGHT 71'•--6a ,ALL OTHER APT BUnDINGS : s1l;c into The pujpta(: 10c -Ord I0 COOnOctlop 9fi 7 item )a on /d - - °l. S, I% City Ctet c i :� • ULM MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT 0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION • ARTICLE II. Description A. Zoning Ordinance No. 11000 1. Section 1304.2.1 Application forms; supplementary materials 2. Section 1702.2.1 General Report 3. Section 1702.2.2 Major Use Special Permit Concept Plan Submitted into thep ublic record In connection with Item On Walter Foeman City Clerk • r� u BISCAYNE VILLAGE MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT PROJECT DESCRIPTION Zoning Ordinance No. 11000 1. Section 1304.2.1 Application forms; supplementary materials (a) Statement of ownership and control of the proposed development of activity. The Disclosure of Ownership and Ownership Affidavit are provided in Article I. (b) Statement describing in detail the character and intended use of the development of activity. Biscayne Village is an urban infill project adhering to the principle of new urban design and incorporating responsible planning technique. The project consists of residential units over the ground floor retail shops and implements the live/work concept. Biscayne Village is a residential project consisting of one; two and three bedroom rental apartments and lofts overlooking Biscayne Bay, ground floor retail along Biscayne Boulevard. The project is centrally located in the Omni neighborhood near Downtown Miami, fronting on Biscayne Boulevard with splendid views of Biscayne Bay. The Biscayne Village project will have on-site parking located in four (4) floors of parking decks strategically located internally to the project with 701parking spaces for maximum design and access benefits. The project will also provide recreational space with pool and spa/club house. A shop will be provided on the North Bayshore Drive frontage along Biscayne Bay. Approximately 19,000 sq. ft. of ground floor retail will be located along Biscayne Boulevard. The project's advantageous location adjacent to Biscayne Bay will provide waterfront living at affordable prices to area residents. The Finger Companies project in developing this project will dedicate to the City sufficient land to allow the north/south continuation of North Bayshore Drive from 19t" Street to 20"' Street Alley, thus enhancing the waterfront promenade from Margaret Pace Park to the north, and unifying and improving internal connections for the area. (c) General location map, showing relation of the site or activity for which special permit is sought to major streets, schools, existing utilities, shopping areas, important physical features in and adjoining the project or activity and the like. The following exhibits are included with the Major Use Special Permit Application and are located under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (i) Location Map: Map of the surrounding street system indicating the project location. (ii) Area Context Map: Map of the project area indicating buildup in the surrounding 41 area. f0corcl Ira �����° 1100'lon I.V1,11 Item �' - ora 119'245--.01, J I — JL i J i °Ayo,Itor 1 oeill N 0 Pi (iii) Aerial: Aerial Photograph of the surrounding area indicating the project site. (d) A site plan containing the title of the project and the names of the project planner and developer, date, and north arrow and , based on an exact survey of the property drawn to a scale of sufficient size to show: The Site plan is located as Sheet A1.41 under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. Boundaries of the project, any existing streets, building, watercourses, easements and section lines; The boundaries of the project and the location of existing streets are shown on the survey located under Tab 5 of the Supporting Documents. ii. Exact location of all buildings and structures; The exact location of all existing buildings located on the Property is shown on the survey located under Tab 5 of the Supporting Documents. The location of the building to be constructed are shown on the Site Plan, under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. iii. Access and traffic flow and how vehicular traffic will be separated from pedestrian and other types of traffic; 41 A detailed analysis of the site access and traffic flow for the development is provided in the Traffic Impact Analysis located under Tab 2 of the Supporting Documents. Service vehicles will access the loading docks from the service entrance. Off-street parking and off-street loading area; Off-street parking will be provided in parking garages internally to the project. All parking levels will have access from ground floor ramps. The parking garages will consist of four (4) Ievel parking decks. The loading berths are available to each side of the project to facilitate access and service. Some of the berths will be reduced in size through a Class II Special Permit, 2. Recreational Facilities; Location and access to recreational facilities can be found under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. 0 3. Screens and buffers; Submitted into the public record In connection Item �z�� on ZU 0 h Waiter Foeman City clook 0 E Landscaping areas are indicated on the Landscape Plan, under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. 4. Refuse collections areas; Waste collection will be provided by a containerized compactor system located in the service area throughout the project (4 separate service areas). These facilities are shown on the Ground Level Plan under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. 5. Access to utilities and points of utilities hookups. Access and connections to site utilities are discussed in the Site Utility Study located under Tab 3 of the Supporting Documents (e) Tabulations of total gross acreage in the project and the percentages thereof proposed to be devoted to the permitted uses and ground coverage. 203,700 gross square feet 4.68 gross acres i. The various permitted uses. Proposed: Residential and Commercial Building Footprint: 77, 424 gross square feet ii. Ground coverage by structures. Ground coverage by the structures is 130,870 or 46% of the total gross lot area. (f) Tabulation showing: The derivation of numbers of off street parking and off street loading spaces shown in (d) above: The number of off street parking spaces required: 457 spaces The total amount of parking spaces provided: 701 spaces Including 15 handicapped spaces ii. Total project density in dwelling units per acre. Allowed: 4.68 acres x 500 units per acre = 2,340 units Proposed: 437 units 193.3 units per acres (g) If common facilities (such as recreation areas of structures, private streets, common open space, etc.) are to be provided for the development, statements as to how such common 0 facilities are to be provided and permanently maintained. itemz'r GKY The project contains several open public areas and walkways. All facilities provided will be maintained by the Owner. (h) Storm drainage and sanitary sewerage plans. Storm drainage, water distribution, waste water and solid waste generation provisions are discussed in the Site Utility Study located under Tab 3 of the Supporting Documents. (i) Architectural definitions for buildings in the development; The design plans are included under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. The development will include 437 units. Typical floor plans for the residential floors are included on sheets A2 -A4 under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (j) Landscaping plan, including types, sizes and locations of vegetation and decorative shrubbery, and showing provisions for irrigation and future maintenance. The Landscaping Plan located on Sheet P-3 under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents, specify the plant types, sizes and locations, as well as indications that all planted areas will be fully irrigated and maintained by the Owner of the project. (k) Plans for recreation facilities, if any, including location and general description of buildings for such use. (1) Such additional data, maps, plans, or statements as may be required for the particular use or activity involved. The Drawings submitted with this Application are located under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (m) Such additional data as the applicant may believe is pertinent to the proper consideration of the site and development plan. Elevations depicting the architectural character of the project are included under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. Section 1702.2.1 General Report. 1. Property ownership or ownerships and beneficial interest within the boundaries ofthe area proposed for Major Use Special Permit. Statement of Ownership and beneficial interest within the boundaries of the area proposed for Major Use Special Permit are provided in Article 1.13 & C. 2. The nature of the unified interest or control. Submitted into the public record In connecIon with , 4 item 02 - /y on , o + .., .a 1_. 0 d Walter r=oeman City Clerk 0 0 The nature of unified interest or control is indicated in Article 1, 3. Survey of the proposed area showing property lines and ownership. A copy of the survey of the Property is included under Tab 5 of the Supporting Documents. 4. Map of existing features, including streets, alleys, easements, utilities lines, existing land use, general topography, and physical features. The existing site features and utility lines are shown on the survey of Property located under Tab 5 and the Site Utility Study located under Tab 3 of the Supporting Documents. In addition, the surrounding street systems are included under Tab 2, Traffic Impact Study and an aerial photograph of the surrounding area indicating the project site is found under Tab 6, Page 3, 5. Materials to demonstrate the relationship of the elements listed in (d) preceding to surrounding area characteristics. The Drawings Submitted with this Application are Iocated under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. Materials may be presented to the Urban Design and Review Board for review. 6. Existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan designations for the area on and around the lands proposed for Major Use Special Permit. The existing zoning designation for the Property pursuant to City of Miami Ordinance No. 11000, as Amended is SD -6. The Zoning Atlas Map on pages 21 and 23 indicates the existing and surrounding mixed use zoning. The comprehensive plan future land use designation for the Property is restricted commercial. The zoning and comprehensive plan designation are consistent with one another. 3. Section 1702.2.2 Major Use Special Permit Concept Plan. 1. Relationships of the concept plan to surrounding existing and proposed future uses. Activities, systems and facilities (transportation, recreation, view corridors, pedestrian systems, services systems and similar uses). Article II contains a written narrative of the Project outlining proposed uses, activities and architectural character. This narrative also contains descriptions of the Project's relationship to traffic, pedestrian movements, and transportation access. Maps located on Tab 6 indicate the Project's relationship to surrounding streets, land uses and functions. Building elevations, sections and perspectives showing the proposed materials, vertical profile and height, and orientation to streets is included in the Drawings Submitted with this Application. The list of Drawings Submitted is found under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. Existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan principles and designations. The Project conforms to the SD -6 zoning for this Property. The comprehensive plan future land use designation conforms with the land use designation currently in effect for this 40 Property. Submitted +roto the, puj,,,,{; r8COOtt An connection with Item 8:ktz,�m on • 2s'•0 4 1 Wafter Foem&(t � j .it. " JLwJ City Clerk • • Set back requirements under the Code are satisfied. This design requirement has been undertaken in order to augment the open space for the future tenants use. The dedication of North Bayshore Drive has been undertaken to enhance waterfront use for the Omni/Edgewater neighborhood. 4. Section 1702.2.3 Developmental Impact Study. 1. A traffic analysis shall be submitted for an area within approximately 114 mile of the site, or an area including the major intersections to be impacted by the site, whichever is larger. The Traffic Impact Analysis is included under Tab 2 of the Supporting Documents. 2. Economic impact data shall be provided, including estimates for construction costs, construction employment, and permanent employment. The Economic Impact Study is included under Tab 4 of the Supporting Documents. 3. A housing impact assessment. The Proj ect is a residential project comprised of437 residential units, on land that is currently vacant. 4. A description of proposed energy conservation measures shall be provided, including only those measures that are proposed in addition to the minimum requirements in State Energy Code. Architecturally, the building envelope will be comprised of insulated walls and roof. Other energy conservation data may be submitted at the time of construction permitting. Electrically, all exterior and landscape lighting will be controlled by means of time clocks and photocell switches. Energy saving lamps, ballasts and fixtures are being considered in all common areas. S. Historic buildings. There are no historic structures located on the Property. 6. Environmental zone. The Property is not located within an environmental preservation district. Submitted, Uilo reward In connet;'ican L°JI`th p , Item on eZs / "� 4 Matter Foeman r : City Clerk 0 0 • • MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS ARTICLE III. Supporting Documents Tab 1 Minority Construction Employment Plan Tab 2 Traffic Impact Analysis Tab 3 Site Utility Study Tab 4 Economic Impact Study Tab 5 Survey of Property Tab 6 Drawings Submitted Submitted Into the public record in connOo on with iters �_z�� on/ -F -ZS -0/ Walter Foemnn City Cleric El 0 • • • • MINORITY CONSTRUCTION EMPLOYMENT PLAN Submitted into the public rewrd In connection with Item f Z -/ on / • -0 61 — 111, 1 � 7 Walter Foeman City Clerk • • • 0 • I. Construction Plan for Minority Equal Opportunity Employment A. Goal. The intent of applicant is to provide employment and economic opportunity for the unemployed and economic disadvantaged residents of Miami. This will be achieved during the various stages of the Project such as application of permit period; Construction Period; and final operation and management of the finished project. B. Background. The applicant of this Project, as with other projects, has always promoted and encouraged equal employment opportunities for minorities. The same efforts of utilizing a minority labor force in the City of Miami will be used on this Project. C. Plan. The applicant has an Equal Employment Opportunity Plan that will be adhered to by all firms involved in the planning, construction, and management and operation of this Project. The following sources will be helpful in promoting equal employment opportunities for this Project. Florida Department of Commerce, Division of Economic Development The National Association of Minority Contractors The National Minority Supplier Development Council II. A. Goal. The intent of applicant is to provide employment and economic opportunity for the unemployed and economic disadvantaged residents of Miami. This will be achieved during the various stages of the Proj ect such as application of permit period; Construction Period; and final operation and management of the finished project. B. Background. The applicant of this Project, as with other projects, has always promoted and encouraged equal employment opportunities for minorities. The same efforts of utilizing a minority labor force in the City of Miami will be used on this Project. C. Plan. The applicant has an Equal Employment Opportunity Plan that will be adhered to by all firms involved in the planning, construction, and management and operation of this Project. The following sources will be helpful in promoting equal employment opportunities for this Project. Florida Department of Commerce, Division of Economic Development 1 Submitted into tho ,public record In connection with ltcm �_ on /D- zs off.__- �J a � J d' ,mfnito�c':,ern �r o Dp!ty' [C> 'r t Florida Department of Transportation The National Association of Minority Contractors The National Minority Supplier Development Council III. Minority Contractor/Subcontractor Equal Employment Plan. A. Goal. To promote economic opportunities for minority contractors and vendors in the City of Miami. B. Background. The applicant's intent is to pursue his successful past practices of hiring qualified minority construction contractors and subcontractors in every phase of the construction and management of the project. IV. The Applicant's Policy Statement for Equal Employment Opportunity. PUE120se To ensure that the company's personnel policies and practices are administered equally and without regard for race, color, religion, sex, age, national origin, handicap, or veteran status. Policy 1. All employees and job applicants are guaranteed equality of employment opportunity. This means that we will not discriminate against any worker or applicant on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, age, national origin, handicap, or veteran status. 2. All recruitment, selection, placement, training, and layoff decisions made by the Company's supervisors or managers will be based solely on candidates job-related qualifications and abilities. All employees who apply for a promotion or transfer will be given equal consideration for a promotion or transfer. Assuming that an opening exists, the qualifications of a candidate for a promotion or transfer will be assessed solely on the basis of the individual's ability and merit (as demonstrated by the applicant's performance record). 4. All other personnel policies and practices of the Company, including compensation, benefits, discipline, and safety and health programs, as well as social and recreational activities, will be administered and conducted without regard to any individual's race, color, religion, sex, age, national origin, handicap, or veteran status. 5. The Company will establish special programs to recruit, hire and ensure the advancement of 0 qualified minority group members, women, handicapped individuals and veterans. 2 Submitted into the public record In oonrt tion with Item AO-/ on&zS-- O/ .., { .. r.. Walter Foeman J � h J d City Clerk • 0 L J 6. The Company will take all necessary steps to ensure that each employee's work environment is free of unlawful discrimination or harassment based on race, color, religion, sex, age, national origin, handicap or veteran status. 3 Submitted into the public record in connection with item on Walter Foeman City Cleric • M0:141 • 2 • • 11 10 10 Biscayne Rentals IPSP -f l-affile study Submitted Into the public record In connecffon with Item /1-/ on zS 0 / Wafter Foeman City Cleric \J Biscayne Rentals MUSP Tra is Study _ 0 TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Exhibits....................................................... List of Appendices.................................................... EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................... iii 1.0 INTRODUCTION .........................= .................... 4 ........ 1 1.1 Project Background................................................1 1.2 Study Objective .................................................... 1 1.3 Study Area and MethodoIogy........................................ 1 2.0 DATA COLLECTION ................................................... 3 2.1 Roadway Characteristics ............................................ 3 2.2 Traffic Counts....................................................4 2.3 Intersection Data .................................................. 4 2.4 Transit..........................................................4 3.0 EXISTING TRAFFIC 0CONDITIONS......................... 7 3.1 Roadway Level of Service (LOS) .............. 7 3.2 Intersection Capacity Analysis ....................................... 8 3.3 Pedestrians.......................................................8 4.0 FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS ........................................ 9 4.1 Project Trip Generation ............................................. 9 4.2 Committed Developments .......................................... 11 4.3 Trip Assignment and Distribution .................................... 11 4.4 Future Intersection Capacity Analysis ................................. 13 4.5 Future Roadway LOS ............................................. 15 5.0 CON$14NS..................................................... is 4 Submitted Into the public; rOccOrd in connec onitem JL; wI H Walter Foemfi City Clerfr 0 0 Biscayne Rentals MUSPTra tcStu LIST OF EXHIBITS Exhibit Page 1 Location Map...........................................................2 2 Existing Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ......................................... 5 3 Existing Lane Configuration ............... .............................. 6 4 Existing Peak Hour Link Capacity Analysis ................................... 7 5 Existing Peak Hour Intersection Capacity Analysis ............................. 8 6 Project Trip Generation..................................................10 7 Cardinal Distribution for TAZ 613 ......................................... 11 8 PM Peak Hour Project Trip Assignment ..................................... 12 9 Future PM Peak Hour Trak Volumes ...................................... 14 0 10 Future PM Peak Hour Link Capacity Analysis with Project ...................... 13 11 Future PM Peak Hour Intersection Capacity Analysis with Project ................ 15 LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix A PM Peak Period Traffic Volume Counts Appendix B Service Volume Worksheets Appendix C Intersection Capacity Analysis - Existing Conditions Appendix D Intersection Capacity Analysis - Future Conditions Submitted into theri reoord in con public item bora with on Jil Waltor F00mnn Cir Clerk BrBcayne Rentals MUSP Traffic S1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Biscayne/ 19" Street Apartments project is aproposed residential rental apartment development located in Miami, Florida between Biscayne Boulevard and North Bayshore Drive from NE 19 Street to NE 20 Terrace. The proposed project consists of approximately 437 residential units, 19,400 square feet (SF) of specialty retail and 740 on-site parking spaces. Access to and from the project would be provided at two entrances on NE 19 Street and another entrance on North Bayshore Drive. Buildout is anticipated for 2003. The City of Miami has requested a MUSP traffic study to assess the impacts of the proposed project. An assessment of the traffic impacts associated with a MUSP was performed for the project in accordance with the` requirements of the City of Miami. The minimum level of service (LOS) standard is E or better for this area (north of NE 17 Terrace). The analysis of existing conditions showed that the intersections of Biscayne Boulevard INE 17 Terrace, Biscayne Boulevard INE 19 Street, and Biscayne Boulevard /NE 21 Street all operate at an acceptable LOS, The analysis of future conditions with the project trip impact showed that with slight signal timing modifications all three intersections will operate at an acceptable LOS. Adequate roadway capacity would be available on the impacted roadway segments to accommodate the proposed project trips in the study area. into t le, puotjc; ltt record in connection with Walter Foeman City Clork Biscayne Rentals MUSP aF " S1.6 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Project Background The Biscayne / 19' Street Apartments project is a proposed residential rental apartment development located in Miami, Florida between Biscayne Boulevard and North Bayshore Drive from NE 19 Street to NE 20 Terrace (See Exhibit 1). The proposed project consists of approximately 437 residential units, 19,400 square feet (SF) of specialty retail, and 74D on-site parking spaces. Buildout is anticipated for 2003. The City of Miami has requested a MUSP traffic study to assess the impacts of the proposed project. 1.2 Study Objective The objective of this traffic study is to assess the traffic impacts of the proposed project on roadway 0 segments and intersections and to make recommendations to mitigate adverse impacts, if any. 1.3 Study Area and Methodology The study area is bounded by NE 20 Street on the north, North Bayshore Drive to the east, Biscayne Boulevard on the west and NE 17 Terrace to the south. The roadway segments analyzed in this study are: • Biscayne Boulevard north and south of NE 19 Street • NE 19 Sh" * east and west of Biscayne Boulevard The intersections analyzed in this study are: • Biscayne Boulevard / NE 17 Terrace • Biscayne Boulevard / NE 19 Street • Biscayne Boulevard / NE 21 Street Suornmea into tolop0lic Page l r wrd In connection with ftm on Walter Foeman L City Ciork r� • PROEM nne� EXHIBIT No. da BISCAYNE RENTALSSubmitt into the 3 TION MAP P MUSP TRAFFIC STUVPOOrd I c nnect^U% Item on %�' � 4 V� V �4Y� City Clerk Biscayne Rentals MUSP Traffic Srudv 0 2.0 DATA COLLECTION Data collection for this study included roadway characteristics, intersection data, signal timing, seasonal factors and transit availability. This effort is described in detail in the following sections. 2.1 Roadway Characteristics Biscayne Boulevard Biscayne Boulevard is a two-way, 4 -lane, undivided roadway with left turn lanes at major intersections in the vicinity of the project. On -street parking is not permitted on this section of roadway. NE 17 Terrace NE 17 Terrace is a two-way, 2 -lane, undivided roadway. The roadway terminates at North Bayshore Drive to the east of Biscayne Boulevard. On -street parking is permitted on both sides of NE 17 Terrace. NE 19 Street NE 19 Street is a two-way, 2 -lane, undivided street along the south side of the proposed project. This street also terminates at North Bayshore Drive east of Biscayne Boulevard. On -street parking is permitted on both sides of NE 19 Street. NE 21-S= NE 21 Stredway, 2 -lane undivided roadway. The roadway terminates at North Bayshore "7 . Drive to the 04thiscayne Boulevard. On -street parking is permitted on both sides of NE 21 Street. r000rd in connection with Page 3 Item on Walter Foeman City Clerk • 0 Biscayne Rentals MUSP Trac Study 2.2 Traffic Counts The PM peak period vehicle turning movement counts were collected at the intersections under study. Volume adjustment factors were obtained from the Florida Department of Transportation (1~ DOT). A volume adjustment factor of 0,97 (for 1999 Miami -Dade County North) corresponding to the date of the counts were used to adjust the raw traffic counts to annual average conditions. Exhibit 2 shows the adjusted 2001 PM peak hour traffic volumes. The adjusted turning movement counts and existing signal timing are included in Appendix A. 2.3 Intersection Data A field survey was conducted to determine the lane configurations at the subject roadway segments and intersections. The existing signal timing and phasing at the study area intersections were obtained from Dade County Traffic Control Center and were used for intersection capacity analysis. Exhibit 3 shows the existing lane configuration at the links and intersections to be analyzed. 2.4 Transit The study area is within a ten minute walk to the Omni Metromover station and Metrobus terminal. The transit terminal serves various routes by both modes. During the PM Peak period the various routes operate at different schedules and have headways ranging between four minutes and thirty minutes. Submitted into they public Page record In connection with J Item %1—k-1 on Walter Foeman �� • k Q FACJEM H BISCAYNE RENTALS MUSP TRAFFIC STUDY 71TLE, oa. EXISTING (2001) PM PEAK HOUR SubmitTO&FFIC VOLUM�S� rocord in Conr,ori Item 12 on M' Walter Foeman City Clerk EXHIBIT No. 2 �211I / VT NE 21 ST NE 19 ST �- NE 17 TERR AAa Ecr! rITLEi EXHIBIT No. BISCAYNE RENTALS s.. EXISTING MUSP TRAFFIC STUDY LANE ASSIGNMENTS aubmittou ,,.,e� ioc, mucid In umult., 11 1 11 Pae 6 item p?.:� orr . Walter >=oeman Cit, Clerk • • Biscayne Rentals MUSP 7'raffic Study 0 3.0 EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS 3.1 Roadway Level of Service (LOS) The City of Miami has adopted a minimum peak period LOS standard of E for roadways in this area. For purposes of this study, service volumes were obtained from Florida's 1998 Level of Service Standards and Guidelines Manual, published by the Florida.Department of Transportation (FDOT) or by using ART -TAB worksheets, also published by FDOT. Link capacity analysis for existing conditions is shown in Exhibit 4 for peak hour conditions. Worksheets are included in Appendix B. Exhibit 4 Existing PM Peak Hour Link Capacity Analysis Roadway Limits Existing Service Volume LOS Traffic Voiume at LOS E' Biscayne Boulevard North of NE 19 Street 2,710 3,530 Acceptable Segment 1 Biscayne Boulevard South of NE 19 Street Segment 2 2,540 3,530 Acceptable NE 19 Street East of Biscayne 95 875 Acceptable Segment I Boulevard NE 19 Sfta West of Biscayne 170 875 Acceptable SegmegE Boulevard NOTE FDOT ART -T Lml of service Standards and Guidelines Manual for Planning, 1998. ,a. SIibmitted Into Me Po Page 7 record In connection ' h , Item P ol�l� Walter Foernan City Clerk Biscayne Rentals MUSP TM&C S 3.2 Intersection Capacity Analysis Intersection capacity analysis was performed using the SIGNAL97 software, based on procedures of the 1997 HCM. Exhibit 5 shows the existing LOS at the signalized intersections. All three intersections currently operate at an acceptable LOS. Worksheets are provided in Appendix C. Exhibit 5 -- Existing PM Peak Hour Intersection Capacity Analysis Source: DPA 0 3.3 Pedestrians Due to the nature of the project and its proximity to transit connections, some pedestrian activity is expected between the project site and other nearby destinations. Page 8 record,Ln conmo . Item on ZOL?5 0 JL � - .L K� � Walter FoofflWi Cit Cierk • 0 BUcaym Rentals MUSP LEE.- Study 4.0 FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS 4.1 Project Trip Generation Trip generation for the project was estimated using the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) trip generation rates and/or equations for the proposed development plan. ITE's Trip Generation, Sixth Edition, provides gross trip generation rates and/or equations for 24-hour and peak hour volumes by land use type. ITE Trip Generation Handbook, October 1998 provides data on internal trips. The proposed development plan incorporates two land uses that will interact within each other, allowing more than one trip to be satisfied without making a trip off-site. For example, some residents and/or visitors will visit the retail components of the project on their trip to or from the apartments, which does not require an additional trip to the site. ITE research shows that a percentage of retail trips to and from a site are 'pass -by" trips. Pass -by trips are trips already using the existing roadway network that are attracted into the project. Using ITE data, it was estimated that approximately 40% of the retail trips are pass -by. It is important to note that pass -by trips are properly reflected at the project driveways. A defined sidewalk network, transit availability, and traffic circulation patterns in the project area provides for pedestrian traffic. Proximity of the Omni transit station to the project also encourages use of transitoftravel. The estimated gross PM peak hour trips generated by the project were reduced bye l to aecount for transit users and pedestrians. A trip generation summary for the project is provided in Exhibit 6. Page 9 record in connection with item on o zs•di .: Walter Foeman City Clerk L • PJ Biscayne Rentals MUSP DE&C Bundy Exhibit 6 Project Trip Generation 0 ITE Land Use Designation and Number of Units, Daily Volume (Two-way) PM Peak Hour Vehicle Trips In Out Total Residential Apartment (437 DUs) 2,897 182 89 271 Specialty Retail (19,400 SF) 789 22 29 51 Internalization 10% of Retail)' -79 -2 -3 -5 Subtotal 3,607 202 115 317 Pass -by Trips (40% of Retail)2.3 -284 -8 -10 -18 Adjustment for Trans itTedestrian. Trips (15%) -541 -30 47 -47 Net New Vehicle Trips 2,782 164 88 252 Source: Notes: DPA (l) Based on ITE Trio Generation manual, Sixth Edition. (Z) This adjustment was calculated for Multi -Use Trip Generation Calculation ITE Trio Generation Handbook, October 1998. (3) Pass -by Trip adjustments for Retail only. :•R�r PUD11C Page 15 record in connection with item �z -% onZ Walter Fooman City Clerk • • Biscayne Rentals MOP Traffic Study 4,2 Commuted Developments The City's staff identified two committed developments in the study area, the Performing Arts Center and the Miramar Centre (phases II and Iii). Traffic reports for these developments were consulted and their project trips were included as part of future background traffic. 4.3 Trip Assignment and Distribution Project trips were distributed and assigned to the study area using the Cardinal Trip Distribution for traffic analysis zone (TAZ) 613 as shown in Exhibit 7. The Cardinal Trip Distribution gives a generalized directional distribution of trips from a TAZ to other parts of Dade County, as published by the Miami Urban Area Transportation Study (MUATS). For estimating trip distribution for the project, consideration was given to conditions such as the roadway network accessed by the project, roadways available to travel in the desired direction, and attractiveness of traveling on a specific roadway. The resulting project trip assignments are shown in Exhibit 8. Exhibit 7 Cardinal Distribution for TAZ 613 Cudinal Direction Distribution NNE 9.96% ENE 3.51% ESE 3.84% SSE 1.56% SSW 17.17% WSW 25.91% WNW 16.77% NNW 21.28% Page Il record In conned -on with Item on Av_—Zso� M. t Walter Foemckri Cleric '7 C� m �3ZZ NE 21 ST ~ 3 4 39 NE 19 ST eT y 39 NE 17 TERR i PgCJECTi T[TLE, EXHIBIT No. 43 BISCAYNE RENTALS "PM PEAK PROJECT MUSP TRAFFIC STUDY TRIP ASSIGNMENT 8 S 1Ocord yin �CLilati��Cf Url tNlt � Page Il Itenj Walter Foeman Biscayne Rentals MUSP rraffic 5 4.4 Future Intersection Capacity Analysis —''- An annual growth factor of one percent, confirmed by the city staff, was applied to the 2001 traffic volumes to obtain the future 2003 volumes. Using the trip assignments in the previous section, the project trips were combined with the adjusted 2003 future traffic volumes to get the total traffic volume on the analyzed roadway segments and intersections. Exhibit 9 shows the future PM peak hour volumes with project and Exhibit 10 shows the resulting LOS at the analyzed intersections. Worksheets are included in Appendix D. Exhibit 10 0 Future PM Peak Hour Intersection Capacity Analysis with Project Intersection Future LOS Future LOS with new signal timin Biscayne Boulevard/NE 21 Street F C Biscayne Boulevard/NE 19 Street F E Biscayne Boulevard/NE 17 Terrace D NA • OuDmItted into theublic Page ! connection 3 record in c � with -- ` Item on /o' zf ol Walter Foerna ) • 0 p1,OJEC T' FUTURE (2003) 71 TLEi EXHIBIT No. pa BISCAYNE RENTALS PM PEAK HOUR 9 MUSP TRAFFIC STUDY SubTRAFFIC VOLUMES 1ARDT)ublic RUG'Ofy in connection with `,Page 14.5 E ,� ft p on _ /a zso/ f'. Walter Foc.%man Cite Clerk • • 0 Biscayne Rentals MUSP r'ra$ic Study 4,5 Future Roadway LOS Link analysis for future PM peak hour with project is shown in Exhibit 11. All major roadway links within the study area would continue to operate at an acceptable LOS (LOS E or better), thus meeting the adopted LOS standard. Exhibit 11 Future PM Peak Hour Link Capacity Analysis with Project Roadway Limits Future Traffic Service Volume LOS Volume at LOSE' Biscayne roit levard g North of NE 19 Street 3,465 3,530 Acceptable Biscayne Boulevard Segment 2 South of NE 19 Street 3,215 3,530 Acceptable NE 19 Street East of Biscayne Segment 1 Boulevard 625 875 Acceptable NE 19 Street West of Biscayne Segment 2 &7�Vo. Boulevard 185 875 Acceptable ' FDOT ART -TAB or Level of service Standards and Guidelines Manual for Planning, 1998. Page 15 • • 0 Biscayne Rentals MUSP DEEC zlut 5.0 CONCLUSIONS An assessment of the traffic impacts associated with the proposed residential project was performed in accordance with the requirements of the City of Miami. The link analysis shows that the roadway segments analyzed maintain an acceptable LOS under future conditions with project. The intersection analysis shows that the existing signal timing would require slight modification at the intersections of Biscayne Boulevard with 19 Street and 21 Street. The cycle lengths were not changed. With the minor timing modifications, the resulting levels of service for the intersections within the study area would operate within the City of Miami acceptable LOS standards. ITRAF.RPT.wpd Submitted into the public Page 16 record In connection wftf , stern � on o Z -WJ Waiter Foeman rt w City Cleric i • E APPENDICES 4. Submitted into the public record in connection with item 4&L-1 on a • % ._ • I Walter Foemein City Clerk • 0 E Appendix A PM Peak Period Traffic Volume Counts Signal Timing Submittua record In connocli IfeM 4eZ — Lon A -25 Walter Foemw GAY Clerk aMADPLUMMiIER6ASSOcLATES. WC. TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS Project Name: 119th Street Rental Apartments Project Number: 00203 Location: Boulevard (US 1 1 NE 21 Street Count Date: 42113/2000 Observer: Engineering& SUrve in Day of Week: Wednesday Bisca Boulevard US 1 _ _ NE 21 StreetTIME INTERVAL NORTH80UND - SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND--- WESTBOUND _ GRAND L T R TOTAL_ L T R TOTAL L T R TOTAL L T R TOTAL TOTAL 04:01) PM 04:15 PM 2 387 3 392 1 99 1 101 2 0 1 3 8 0 6 14 _510_ 04.15 PM 04:30 PM 3 361 3 367 9 232 4 245 5 0 2 `7 5 -- 2 10 629 04-30 PM 04:45 PM 0 3737 380 6 239 4 249 1 1 1 3 2 0 6 8 640_ 04:45 PM 05:00 PM 4 348 8 360 4 259 5 268 0 0 4 4 1 0 5 6 fi38 05:00 PM 05:15 PM 5 392 6 403 8 259 3 270 8 0 6 14 20 4 _8 32 719__ 05:15 PM 05:30 PM 4 439 1 444 16 257 2 275 2 2 3 7 2 0 fi 8 734 05:30 PM 05:45 PM 8 408 2 418 1 231 S 238 7 1 6 14 7 0 - -3 10 680 -` 05:45 PM 06:00 PM 9 400 11 420 3 234 7 244 2 i 2 5 8 0 7 15 684 4 i PM PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY ANNUAL AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC CONDITIONS Bisca ne Boulevard US 1 Y � _ � NE 21 Street NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND D TIME EASTBOUND WESTBOUND _�� GRAND INTERVAL L T _JjR� TOTAL L T R TOTAL L T R TO�� L T R TOTAL f TOTAL 05:00 PM 06:00 PM 25 1 590 �I �—_�l_�__ ��(��19� 1.634 27 952 17 l ,n 4 a� Iso" I 4 73 li 63 2,732 PEAK HOUR FACTOR 0.95 0.93 0.71 — 3 - — 0.51 f1 0.96 Note: 1999 FDOT Seasonal Weekly Volume Factor 0.97 biscayne2l. WK4 0 0 (DAVID PLWAMAER d ASSOCIATES. INC. TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS Project Name: 1191h Street Rental Apartments Location: Boulevard US 1 1 NE 17 Terrace Observer. En inearin 8 Surve in Project Number: Count Date: Day of Week: 00203 12!1312000 - - - Wednesday TIME INTERVAL Mises Boulevard US 1 NORTHBOtND SOUTHBOUND L T R TOTAL L 7 R TOTAL NE 97 Terrace-- _ EASTBOUNDWESTBOUND L T R TOTAL L T R TOTAL GRAMI� TOTAL0400 PM 04:15 PM 04:15 PIA 04:30 PM 0a:3o 04:45 1 273 10 284 45 176 2 223 0 291 19 310 41 187 3 231 1 307 17 325 41 213 1 255 2 2 3 0 4 3 2 3 1 7 7 6 136-81 7 5 79 l 1 11 72 100 91� 94 _614 639 680 04:05 PM 05:00 PM 05:00 PM 05:15 PM 3 285 12 300 46 215 2 263 1 346 12 359 4 2 3 9 19 �13 82 114 686_ 52 2i 1 5 268 0 3 2 5 17 14 78 109 -� 05:15 PM 05:30 PM 05:30 PM 05A5 PM 5 363 11 379 46 203 3 252 5 369 16 390 73 179 2 254 2 5 5 2 5 4_ 12 � i l 16 10 58_ 14 13_ 59 - 84 -- 741 7-2-7--1 _ 2 334 16 352 50 165 3 218 05:as PM 06:00 PM _ 0 2 _ _86 741 35 6- 2 57 65 640 PM PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY ANNUAL AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC CONDITIONS TIME L IUUKIMSUUNU I Sol INTERVAL- �� T R TOTAL L T 04:45 PM 05:45 PM 14 1,322 49 1,385 210 784 PEAK HOUR FACTOR 0.92 Note: 1999 FOOT Seasonal Weekly Volume Factor 0.97 Submi.ted tnt¢n tre Public record in c©l:llection Wth Walter FOeman Ch,Y Clerk IUUNO �� EASTBOUND R TOTAL L T R 12 1.006 11 8 1 15 14 aW 0.97 M WESTBOUND _ GRAN O TO 'OTAL �LT � RTAL��TOTAL� 36 64 49 268 3812,808 0.77 0.86 f 0.98 biscayne&19th.WK4 i 0 OAMD PLUNMER s ASSOCGATES, Jb C. TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS Project Name: l 19th Street Rental Apartments Location: Boulevard (US 1 1 NE 19 Street Observer. Ent ineerin & Surve 'n ip TIME I NORTHB[3 INTERVAL L T F 04:00 PM 04:15 PM 9 1 338 1 4 04:15 PM 04:30 PM 8 345 1 3 04:30 PM 04745 PM 7 383 0_ 04:45 PM 05.00 PM 6 345 1 05:00 PM 105.15 PM 9 407 2 05:15 PM 05:30 PM 5 425 0 05:30 PM 05:45 PM 5 414 1 D5:45 PM 06-00 PM 5 420 0 f Project Number: 00203 Count Date: 12/1312000 Day of Week: - Wednesday nlnee -Boulevard (US 1) �� NE 19 Street ��L___� SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND _WESTBOUND ~_ GRAND_ TOTAL L T R TOTAL L T R TOTAL LTOTAL 351 5 217 �1 —2 234 6 3 T- -TO _L _ �� 9- 18 9 �3� 12_ 16 _61-99 356 8 226 5 239 10 2 8 _20 4 0 9 13 628-- 390 8 244 6 258 143 7 24_ 1 1 �7 g� 681 - 352 6 229 5 240 12 1 14 27 2 d- - 4 6 418 6 268 13 287 8 4 7 19 �53-~—_6 14 738_ 430 11 245 7 263 13 6 12 31 2 2 7 11 735 420 9 256 9 274 16 2 11 29 1 3 12 16 739 425 5 211 7 223 15 5 5 25 2 3 i 6- --679 _ PM PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY ANNUAL AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC CONDITIONS TIME NUM MUUNa �L SOUTHBOi 6INTERVAL L T R [TOTAL L T R PM OB:00 PM 23 1,816 3-=98 r 30951 35 PEAK HUM FACTOR Note: 1999 FDOT Seasonal Weekly Volume Factor 4.97 SubmitIEC into ,h& ti , /-G W ch Q4- yCferk _TIAL JL L T R 1,016 50 i6 34 0.91 TOTAL L LL T_ R 101 10 i1 �25 0.84 —_- GRAND TOTAL TOTAL 46 2,804 0.73 j- 0.98 biscayne819th. WK4 n f� 40 • • PATTERN SCHEDULE FOR 2390 0 & NE 19 ST TIME PT OFF NSG G Y EWW F G 0 10 MIN: PATTERN SCHEDULE FOR 4836 US 1 & NE 21 ST 55 FOR DAY # 4 (SECTION 3) TIME PT OFF NSG G Y R XW F EWG Y R NSL Y 23 S Y M CYC 0 MIN: 11 0 16 30 1 4 1 7 15 15 10 10 4 2 5 5 3 1 4 545 1 35 55 1 4 7 18 1 4 615 2 66 55 1 4 7 6 82EARLY NI 15 21 0 30 1 4 1 7 15 10 4 2 5 3 75 6 82NITE M2 115 23 0 30 1 4 1 7 15 10 4 2 5 3 10 6 82LATE NIG 500 19 0 30 1 4 1 7 15 10 4 2 5 3 4 6 82DAWN M2 545 1 32 32 1 4 1 7 15 14 4 2 7 3 18 8 90AVG M2 0 615 2 68 32 1 4 1 7 15 14 4 2 7 3 1 4 8 90PRE AM M 745 12 82 30 1 4 1 7 15 16 4 2 7 3 88 41 8 90AM PEAK 845 16 81 45 1 4 1 7 15 18 4 2 10 3 12 8 110MID MORN 1200 17 76 45 1 4 1 7 15 18 4 2 10 3 8 110NOON M2 1345 10 76 45 1 4 1 7 15 18 4 2 10 3 8 110AFT M1 0 1545 9 44 47 1 4 1 7 15 21 4 2 10 3 8 115PRE PM P 1630 18 74 47 1 4 1 7 15 21 4 2 10 3 8 115PM PEAK 1.800 3 30 30 1 4 1 7 15 16 4 2 7 3 8 90POST PM 1900 1 32 32 1 4 1 7 15 14 4 2 7 3 8 90AVG M2 0 2130 11 0 30 1 4 1 7 15 10 4 2 5 3 6 82EARLY NI • • PATTERN SCHEDULE FOR 2390 US 1 & NE 19 ST TIME PT OFF NSG G Y EWW F G Y 10 MIN: 20 12 1 18 1 4 0 11 35 55 1 4 7 18 1 4 15 21 0 30 1 4 7 18 1 4 115 23 0 30 1 4 7 18 1 4 500 19 0 30 1 4 7 18 1 4 545 1 35 55 1 4 7 18 1 4 615 2 66 55 1 4 7 18 1 4 745 12 74 55 1 4 7 16 1 4 845 16 53 75 1 4 7 18 1 4 1200 17 58 75 1 4 7 18 1 4 1345 10 58 75 1 4 7 18 1 4 1545 9 54 80 1 4 7 18 1 4 1630 18 45 80 1 4 7 18 1 4 1800 3 32 55 1 4 7 18 1 4 1900 1 35 55 1 4 7 18 1 4 2130 11 35 55 1 4 7 18 1 4 PATTERN SCHEDULE FOR 4136 US 1 & NE 17 TERR TIME PT OFF NSW F Y EWW F G Y SL Y R FOR DAY # 4 (SECTION 3) S Y M CYC 90EARLY NI 6 65NITE M2 6 65LATE NIG 6 65DAWN M2 90AVG M2 0 90PRE AM M 90AM PEAK 110MID MORN 110NOON M2 110AFT M1 0 115PRE PM P 115PM PEAK 90POST PM 90AVG M2 0 90EARLY NI FOR DAY # 4 (SECTION 3) S Y M CYC 90EARLY NI 6 82DAWN M2 6 67LATE NIG 6 67DAWN M2 90AVG M2 0 90PRE AM M 90AM PEAK 110MID MORN 110NOON M2 110AFT M1 0 115PRE PM P 115PM PEAK 90POST PM 90AVG M2 0 90EARLY NI Submitted into the Public ramrd 'n cOnnectfOn with $ern p`L�.-- �� On et,r c=al Walter FoOman City Clerk MIN: 7 10 12 1 5 0 11 88 41 10 4 6 12 1 4 7 4 1 500 19 0 30 1 4 1 7 15 10 4 2 5 3 115 23 0 20 10 4 6 12 1 4 5 4 1 500 19 0 20 10 4 6 12 1 4 5 4 1 545 1 88. 4.1. 10 4 6 12 1 4 7 4 1 615 2 340 10 4 6 12 1 4 8 4 1 745 12 2.,; AX, 10 4 6 12 1 4 7 4 1 845 16W-14 10 4 6 12 1 4 16 4 1 1200 17 +�' 4 6 12 1 4 15 4 1 1345 10 3'' 50`10 4 6 12 1 4 18 4 1 1545 9 54 55 10 4 6 12 1 4 18 4 1 1630 18 14 55 10 4 6 12 1 4 18 4 1 1800 3 1 40 10 4 6 12 1 4 8 4 1 1900 1 88 41 10 4 6 12 1 4 7 4 1 2130 11 88 41 10 4 6 12 1 4 7 4 1 FOR DAY # 4 (SECTION 3) S Y M CYC 90EARLY NI 6 65NITE M2 6 65LATE NIG 6 65DAWN M2 90AVG M2 0 90PRE AM M 90AM PEAK 110MID MORN 110NOON M2 110AFT M1 0 115PRE PM P 115PM PEAK 90POST PM 90AVG M2 0 90EARLY NI FOR DAY # 4 (SECTION 3) S Y M CYC 90EARLY NI 6 82DAWN M2 6 67LATE NIG 6 67DAWN M2 90AVG M2 0 90PRE AM M 90AM PEAK 110MID MORN 110NOON M2 110AFT M1 0 115PRE PM P 115PM PEAK 90POST PM 90AVG M2 0 90EARLY NI Submitted into the Public ramrd 'n cOnnectfOn with $ern p`L�.-- �� On et,r c=al Walter FoOman City Clerk • Appendix B Service Volume Worksheets Submitted into the Public dp Word in conned®n With item 0, J.Y. .L. Walter Foeman City Clerk • DESCRIPTION Road Name From To Peak Direction Study Time Period Analysis Date Number of lanes AADT User Notes 0 f.� ART -TAB 3.0 Arterial Level of Service Volume Tables Based on Chapter 11 of the 1997 Highway Capacity Manual Update Florida Department of Transportation Bisca ne Boulevard NE 15 Street NE 26 Street Northbound PM Peak Januay 19, 2001 4 40,000 Default Spreadsheet ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS PEAK HOUR PEAK DIRECTION VOLUME (includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) Y& Intersectionger-mile Level of Service NES A B C D E 1 NIA NIA 330 830 1,080 2 NIA NIA 730 1,820 2,190 3 NIA NIA 1,130 2,830 3,300 4 NIA NIA 1,540 3,840 4,410 {Includes vehicles in exclusive tum lames) ---Range- K Factor 0.09 (0.08 - 0.20) D Factor 0.62 (0.50.1.00) Peak Hour Factor 0.97 (0.70.1.00) Adj Saturation Flow Rate 1830 (1400 - 2000) a Tums from Exclusive Lanes 12 (0-100) 1,740 ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS PEAK HOUR PEAK DIRECTION VOLUME (includes vehicles in exclusive turn lanes) Y& Intersectionger-mile Level of Service NES A B C D E 1 NIA NIA 330 830 1,080 2 NIA NIA 730 1,820 2,190 3 NIA NIA 1,130 2,830 3,300 4 NIA NIA 1,540 3,840 4,410 Urbanized, Transitioning/Urban, {Includes vehicles in exclusive tum lames) (Includes vehicles in exclusive tum lanes) 75 .Intersections per milQ or Rural Area Type Arterial Class (U, T, or R) (1,2,3, or 4) 7,� Int -s mections ggr mile Level of Service 3 NES A B C 0 E 2 NIA NIA 530 1,340 1,740 4 NIA NIA 1,170 2,940 3,530 6 NIA NIA 1,830 4,560 5,320 8 NIA NIA 2,490 6,200 7,110 Urbanized, Transitioning/Urban, (Includes vehicles in exclusive tum lanes) U or Rural Area Type Arterial Class (U, T, or R) (1,2,3, or 4) 7,� Int -s mections ggr mile 3 30 Free Flow Speed(mph) (40,35,30,25) Level of Service 0.8 E Total Length of Arterial(mi) ES A B C 0 E N 2 NIA NIA 5,900 14,900 19,300 Medians(Y/N) Y Left Turn Bays (YIN) 1 4 NIA NIA 13,000 6 NIA NIA 20,300 32,600 50,700 39,200 59,100 _ SIGNALMATION CHARACTERISTICS 8 NIA NIA 27,600 68,900 79,000 No.Signalized Inters I of service is not achievable Arrival Type,Peat4 Z (1,2,3,4,5 or 8) eak Your Peak Direction Through! Ight vlc Ratio for the Type Signal Syttilti`9 (P, S, or A) Full Hour System Cycle Length(sec) 113 (60 - 240 sec) Level of Service Weighted Thru Mvmt C 0.3$ 0.20 --0.80) ES A B C D E 1 NIA NIA 0.29 0.75 0.96 2 NIA NIA 0.32 0.81 0,98 3 NIA NIA 0.34 0.84 0.98 4 NIA NIA 0.34 0.86 0.98 e�mitterj ,., rd in C0nncwlon . Its on d-ilt,1 altc,r F�,i7 city Mork: diem j4e7✓ on Walter Foetyi,- City Cleric Table 5-7 TWO WAY PEAK HOUR VOLMES FOR FLOFMA's URBANIZEDGENERALIZED AREAS* STATE TWO-WAY ARTERIALS FREEWAYS unl1TrlaWM0 now Unsignall2,d Ofoup1 wN11% AN s slahuwdMOAN wWtoodrg10 p4,49ftNA dnSmuwdM Lansal Leval of Service Divided A H C D E Laval of Service 2 Undivided 810 1,270 1,720 2,260 3,010 Lan" A H C D E 4 Div Wed 1,950 3260 1,560 5.470 6.510 / 1,900 3,000 4,500 5,300 7,200 6 Divided 2.930 4,690 8,640 8,210 9.770 6 2,990 4,600 7,000 9,900 11,000 B 3,900 8,300 4.500 12,200 15.100 10 4.900 7.900 11, 900 15.200 1$.600 ;NTFIRAwrlto FLOW 12 6,700 9,300 13,900 17,900 22.100 Clas6Ii+a.00toI."a«nQ10Grou� _ 2 nw.vn YssrwiW LlM.,e Fain Olde li Lansair Low *I of Service Laval of Swvice Divided k• B C D••• IF- Lanes A B C 0. :..: E 2 Undkided NIA 1,000 1,4 1,550 I, 4 1,900 3,000 4,5W 0,600 8,900 4 0ivi1 NIA 2,190 3,080 3,290 3,2130 8 3.000 4,800 1.000 8,900 10.500 6Dtvided. NIA 3.330 4,540 4,600 4,91W B 4,000 4$,300 9,500 12,100 14,400 404VWed NIA 4,210 5,710 5.990 5.900 10 5.000 7,900 11,000 15,100 18,000 , 12 5,900 9,300 1 900 17,700 21,100 Class 11 tzsob4so slpreeMinY�.araro«nuN) NO111.4TNE ROADWAYS Lanesl Ler of of Service . ►wcwcmrcalarrrwAt3vrAra . Divided Ar. H» 0E 2 Undlvlded N! NIA 920 1,300 1.500 Level of Service ::.. 4 Div Wad NIA NIA 2,130 3,020 3• r90 Lapse: AP' S•' c D. : E 8 Divided NIA NIA 7,300 4,580 4,810 2 UndNlded. 6 Div Udd NIA NIA 4w 5.500 5.900 4 DMtded' NIA NIA 1,810 2,860 3,080 6 Divided: NIA NIA 2 604 4,380 4,640 ' Clots a III ones VAO r'.sa ren.xr.e inra.Nan. pw r4. ud nd nredn aaww dry C YYhuaMwmdowel afua?"Ald&** a$Maog1 ORSFlRM4Lls011GA0WAYa lslgnal3B Irdefaeelbn arlayeb} : Lanes ' Level of Ssrvics Lanes : A- D E Divided At. 01- C a E 2 UndNidsd 2 Undivided NIA NIA 310 1,110 1,450 4 plvil(b: NA` NIA 1,060 2.170 2.310 4Dlvlded N/A NIA 720 2,568 3,000 BONWild NIA NIA 1,120 3,960 4,660 8 DN elect Ni NIA 1,410 4,990 5.710 ADJif STM E)I TS avweauravloao Cfas a IV 6new her 1./e rK.r�w nrwwlinapr M4. Ma rnln /.Mir awow* combed uetiM r.r.em 29111X ► etb OwHd - • -wwa«�w0 Cars *+wy,rw.n. Lan Turn Adjustment Lanes Vediars Hale Factors .. . . Lineal Lwel of Serv" 2 Dlr(dsd.. Yes o.M Divided. Ar' " C b E 2 Lkidivided No •20% 2 Undivltlsd 1. 1.410 MUH- Undivided Y40 •6% 4 flivldedFN/A A pD 2.750 2.900 III - Undivided No "25% ,. 6Div Wed .', 1,260 4,198 4.510 8 ON Wed :. I.6 8 5,170 5, 530 ONE-WAY . -(ANN 94nweM,dng rwrey Mkt Adeaw,•wne. -. The Fliodit 01joraed of Thimp osilan. SOUTCO: Systems PNrlss✓r1g Clliee One-way Lanes eeerd.ae. Ad�Usdmsrtt. ' 905 9uwee Sited• AW RolmRolm18 rlrt +.M., Factors Taltshasses. Florida 3230460• 2"i a. .40%. 4 - a .40% hlgx/Av vw. da.stals.f tue1plsnn+fq ; 8 -25% ' The I" dose not eamtllule a slandard and should be used" nor gerwal *reit appAeaMw&, Da compuigr modaM from which Me table k ftwed . should be used la man specllic plartninq appAcatluns. The tetlis and dsNvlrq earnpwo modew should nd be used loi canldar or Intwasatlory dei o% whwe mare ref Ined techniques exist. Vahraa shoe► err two wry hCury maximum volumes tar IweM of service, and am deiced on the 1997 Update to the HVw,%y CaWdy Mutual and "a Iref fie, roartany, and signadselton data. Tocomron t0 wixiil avwagasiyly trallie volurnes, these vob3mM must be dlvidad by an upprgWl0e K100 I aclar (not peak -la -dally ratio). The table's input value sssumpllane wd isyso of sanies enures appear on the lollclo q page. . •• cannot be AC Now ed. •• Vowmesarscomparable bdeaw.,estor$action eapocCoes havebeenirewrood. bw,g% Submitted into ihQ ujj= record in connection v!iq, diem j4e7✓ on Walter Foetyi,- City Cleric • • n i 0 Appendix C Intersection Capacity Analysis Existing Conditions Submitted into thLa public record In aannctlon with Item Z -i on o. ; Walter FO man dP. 0 Biscayne/19 St. Rental Apartments 01/09/Q1 Biscayne Blvd (US 1) / NE 17 Terrace 11:18:42 Existing PM Peak SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages; Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.63 Vehicle Delay 37.3 Level of Service D+ ------------------------------------- Sq 0 1 Phase 1 1 Phase 2 1 Phase 3 1 **/** -------------------------------------- 1 + + + 1 ^ l + 1 1 + + + I ++++1 + /1\ 1<+ + +> l <++++I +> 1 ! I v I ^ ++++1 I I 1 I++++ v I I North I <+ + +>1++++> I I 1++ 1 v I I I G/C=0.565 I G/C=0.165 I G/C=0+157 1 I G= 65.0" 1 G- 19.0" 1 G= 18.0" 1 l Y+R= 4.0" 1 Y+R= 4.0" 1 Y+R= 5.0" 1 OFF= 0.0% 1 OFF --60.0% I OFF=80.0% 1 ------------------------------------- C=115 sec G=102.0 sec = 88.7$ Y=13.0 sea 11.3% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ I Lane IWidth/I g/C I Service Ratel Adj I I HCM I L 190% Maxi 1 Group I Lanesl Reqd Used I @C (vph) @E lvolumel We I ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Delay I S I Queue I N Approach 12.6 B+ I TH+RTI 24/2 10.349 10.565 1 1899 1 1996 1 838 10.420 I 14.9 1 B+l 294 ftl I LT 1 12/1 10.296 10.765 1 1340 1 1354 1 221 10.163 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3.9 1 A 1 84 ftl S Approach 20.7 C+ 1 TH+RTI 24/2 10.466 10.565 1 1893 1 1990 1 1444 10.726 1--20.8 1 C+l 507 ftl I LT 1 12/1 10.252 10.565 1 216 1 288 1 15 10.052 1 11.5 1 B+1 25 ftl ---------- .....----------------------------------------------------------------- E Approach::., 162.3 F I TH+RTI 12/1 10.350 10.165 1 1 1 241 I 335 11.245 1 185.7 1 F 1 452 ft1 1 LT 1 12/1 10.252 10.165 1 1 1 198 1 67 10.294 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 45.4 1 D 1 90 ftl W Approach 44.5 D+ f TH+RTI 12/1 10.228 10.165 1 1 1 264 1 24 10.082 1 41.2 1 D+1 32 ftl ---LT---I-12/1-10-266-10_165-I-----------40-I----15-10_231-I--49_8-I-D-I--25 ftl --- SuiK mitted into ttiu public Word In connection with Item f_ 1� on JI Walter Foeman E Biscayne/19 Street Rental Apartments 01/09/01 Biscayne Blvd (US 1) /NE 19 St 11:21:33 Existing PM Peak SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.001 - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages: Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.56 Vehicle Delay 11.4 Level of Service B+ ------------------------- Sq 11 1 Phase 1 1 Phase 2 1 ------------------------- I + + + I AI I + + + I ++++1 /1\ !<+ + +> I <++++I I l v I ++++I I IA I++++ v I North I <+ + +>I++++> I ! I + + + I++++ I 1 + + + I v ! ------------------------- I G/C-0.704 I G/C=0.226 I I G= 81.0" I G= 26.0" 1 I Y+R= 4.0" I Y+R= 4.0" I I OFF- 0.0% I OFF=73.9$ I ------------------------- C=115 sec G=107.0 sec = 93.0% Y- 8.0 sec = 7.0% Ped=,0.0 sec = 0.0% ---_ - ----� ----j-� ------- I Lane Width/1 g/C ServiceRatel Ad f HCH I L 190 Marl I Group I Lanesl Reqd Used I ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- @C (vph) @E lVolumel v/c I Delay I S I Queue I N Approach 7.8 A I TH+RTI 24/2 10.385 10.704 1 2480 1 2480 1 1038 10.419 1 7.6 1 A 1 248 ftl I LT 1 12/1 10.473 10.704 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 78 1 109 1 32 10.274 1 11.9 I B+1 25 ftl S Approach 11.2 B+ I TH+RTI 24/2 10.520 10.704 1 2492 1 2492 1 1704 10.684 1 11.2 1 B+1 407 ftl I LT 1 12/1 10.280 10.704 1 264 1 ----------- ----------------------------------------------------------------- 314 1 24 10.076 1 5.8 1 A 1 25 ftl E Approai 35.3 D+ I RT 1 12/1 10.230 10.226 1 16 1 340 1 26 10.073 1 35.4 1 D+1 33 ft! ILT+TH 1 12/1 10.229 10.226 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 17 1 361 1 23 10.061 1 35.2 1 D+1 29 ftl W Approach 40.4 D+ ILT+TH+RTI 12/1 10.272 10.226 1 13 1 287 1 106 10.344 1 40.4 1 D+1 133 ftl - - - - - - - - - - --------------------------------„wr.---------------------------------- ubMitted into the public r®COM In Dort Gabon with � ;terra enro•?s: w 1i � ;t r) ' Wolter Foernan r� IBJ • • Biscayne/19 Street Rental Apartments Biscayne Blvd (US 1) /NE 21 St Existing PM Peak SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.001 - Capacity Analysis Summary 01/09/01 11:16:11 Intersection Averages: Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.93 Vehicle Delay 76.6 Level of Service E ------------------------------------- Sq 0 1 Phase 1 I Phase 2 1 Phase 3 1 **/ * __-....---_____________________________ 1 + + + I 1 + 1 1 + + + 1 ++++I + /1\ 1<+ + +> I <++++I +> I I I v I A ++++I ! 1 I A I++++ v I I North I <# + +>1++++> I <+ I I I +++ I++++ I + I I + + + I v I + ------------------------------------- G/C=0.417 1 G/C=0.183 I G/C=0.087 I I G= 48.0" I G= 21.01, 1 G= 10.01, I I Y+R= 5.0" I-Y+R= 6.0" 1 Y+R= 3.0" 1 I OFF= 0.0% I OFF --65.2% I OFF --88.7% I ------------------------------------- C=115 sec G= 79.0 sec = 68.7% Y=14.0 sac = 12.2% Ped=22.0 sec = 19.1% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I Lane (Width/I g/C I Service Rates Adj I I HCM I L 190% Max! I Group I Lanesl Reqd ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Used I @C (vph) @E IVolumel v/c I Delay I S I Queue I N Approach 29.7 C ----------- — I TH+RT1 24/2 10.381 10.417 1 1211 1 1473 1 1020 10.692 1 30.2 1 C 1 480 _... ftI I LT 1 12/1 10.230 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10.530 1 824 1 939 1 28 10.030 1 12.9 1 B+1 25 ftl S Approach 107.3 F I TH+RTI 24/2 10.519 10.417 1 1213 1 1475 1 1694 11.148 1 108.7 1 F 1 798 ftl I LT 1 12/3 10.229 10.530 1 824 1 939 1 26 10.028 1 12.9 1 B+l 25 ftl ---------rrwwr.►i�--------------......r.r.---..-----_-_---------------------------.------ E ApproacW'°• :. 43.4 D+ ILT+TH+RTI 12/1 10.255 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10.183 1 1 1 209 1 66 10.278 1 43.4 1 D+1 87 ftl W Approach 41.0 D+ ILT+TH+RTI 12/1. 10.240 10.183 1 1 1 220 1 40 10.162 1 41.0 1 D+l 53 ftl - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -,- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ _ - r A"I Into the pubFrt:... _ . Walter ! o�rr�'r • • 0 i Appendix D Intersection Capacity Analysis Future Conditions .-.ft Submitted into the p u -')int, Word 1n connection itom 1 L on Walter Foeman City Clerk • • Future Conditions Existing Signal Timing ."k, Submitted into than pL4h, record in connection with item on Walter Foeman City Clerk Biscayne/19 St. Rental Apartments Biscayne Blvd (US 1) / NE 17 Terrace with project PH Peak SIGNAL97/TEAPAC(Ver 1.00] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages: Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.73 Vehicle Delay Sq 0 -- I Phase 11Phase --~ 2 1phase -- 3 f ------------------------------------- am=a=aasaaaaa=ammaaaarasasasramaamsaaasaaaaraaa�aaaaiaamataaaaasmaaaaweenaamemaaraa 0 521 565 882 979 !0.257 1189 x258 + + + A + + + + ++++ + / <+ + +> <++++ +a ` ----------- ----------------------------------------------------------------- V ++++ A ++++ v North <+ + +> ++++> as=aa=aaaa�t yy.���aaamaaarawon= 12/1 0 353 + + + ++++ LT+RTI 0 165 10.315 10.165 + + + v f ------------------------------------- G/Ca0.565 G/C=0.165 G/C=0.157 G= 65.0" Gm 19.0" Ga 18.0" Y+Ra 4.0" Y+Ra,4.0" Y+Rm 5.0" OFF= 0.0% OFFa60.0% OFF=80.094 - Cm115 sec G-102.0 Sac a 88.75-Ym13.0 07/16/01 16:26:06 41.8 Level of Service D+ sec a 11.3% Ped: 0.0 sec a 0.0% 0 - Lane-- Width/--•----g/C_------Service Rate---Aaj------------HCH----L __-- --Group -I Lanes! Reqd Used I OC (vph) an lVolumal v/c I Delay S Que� us ----------------------------------�----------------------------S------- N Approach 13.1 B+ mama===raama=max====asaaaaamr===man =am=====maim =m=aa=aaaasaaa=am ---LT TH+RT1 20 ftl 12/1 10.298 10.765 1340 1354 225 (0.166 456 1 x - 3.9 A 385 ft ------------------------------------------- ---- -------------- S Approach 25.7 C+ am=a=aasaaaaa=ammaaaarasasasramaamsaaasaaaaraaa�aaaaiaamataaaaasmaaaaweenaamemaaraa 0 521 565 882 979 !0.257 1189 x258 �__-LT+RT1 12/1 10 0.565 1 87 10.852 ' 16is 0.058 1 1 11.7 1 B+J 593 25 ft ----------- ----------------------------------------------------------------- E Approach r 152.9 F as=aa=aaaa�t yy.���aaamaaarawon= 12/1 0 353 ==am==m=mmaramagaeaaaasaaaaaaaaasaaam9asaa�aaaaamz� LT+RTI 0 165 10.315 10.165 241 341 1 268 + 94 181.5 f f -460 12/1 ---------f--------------------------- 1 197 199 10.877 -- ----------f-------I F 269 ft W Approach 42.2 D+ vam=aamaaarm:aasmam=ammaa=amaasa=aaaamamamm=�=maamaa:=mama=arasarseaaxa�a=mama=s�maea LT 12/1 12/1 10.246 10.165 1 240 ` 38 , f --- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 0.123 44.8 D+1 25 ft Submitted into tho public record in,lonne li nn wwit Walter Foeman u :. City Clerk Biscayne/19 Street Rental Apartments Biscayne Blvd (IIs 1) /NN 19 St /01 07/07/161631 with project PM Peak SIGNAL97/TBAPAC(Ver 1.001 - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages: Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.88 Vehicle Delay 1.03.7 Level of Service F -- - Sq 11 1 Phase 1Phase2 1 **/** ------------------------- + + + ++++ 11 <+ + +> <++++ V ^ ++++ ^ ++++ v North <+ + +> ++++> + + + ++++ + + + v G/C=0.704 I -- a/C= 226-- G= 81.0" Gla 26.0" Y+Ra 4.0". Y+Ra 4.0" OFF= 0.0% OFFm73.9% - C=115 sec Gw 107.0sec = 93.0% Y= 8.0 sec 7.0% Pad= 0.0 sec a 0.0% ---Width/------- r ---------------------------- -- Lane I i g /C-------Servs R a 0%eM ax Group Lanes RegdUsed CSC (vph) CIE 1volumel v/Q I --�-Ue ------------------------------------------------�----------- Delay IS 1.9 --------- Queue N Approach 235.9 F aaaageaaataaaaaaaaasmaaamassasaamamamasaayuamaamreaaaasaasaaasatasaammaaasaaaaaaaasaama 24/2 02435 10.70484 10-517 --yLT+RT1 12/1. 11..000432 0.704 1 1 24342 � 1256 3.938 .7 1 1375.4 F 1 307 122 ft. S Approach 15.0 B aaamaasamasamammsamamasaaaaaamama:aaaaaa=asSara=aeaaammamaamaa:aaaaaamaaaasaaaaaa TH+RT 24/1 10.599 0.704 2466 LT 12,/1 . 2467 0.312 10.704 � 179 � 226 � 2025 0.821 24 0.106 l 15.1 6.4 f B A � 484 ft 25 ft � ------------- --------------------------------------------------------------- E 8 Approach �� N 41.5 D+ _maasaa=as*iM.*If1lYsmta=a�rrsmmasaaecaaaaaaaaaasmaaaasamasaamamaaaraaaamamsaamaaaamaaa RT . ILT+TH 1680.215 285 12/1 0.252 0.226 13 I 297 J ------------------------------------------- 37.7 D+ ft W Approach 41..3 D+ amaaasaaas�masmyaaaameeaaaaamamsaamaaaamaaasaaamaamaamaaaamasaaammaaama=aaaaynsaaaa �LT+TH+RT� 12/1 0.277 �0.2Z6 � 13 284 j � 1160.380 J 41.3 � D+� 145 ft� --------------------------- --------------------------------- 1jt)sd3iited into PIC Pub" record in connection with item / on Walter Foeman City Clerk • 0 Biscayne/19 Street Rental Apartments 07/16/01 Biscayne Blvd (IIs 1) /NH 21 St 1.6:28:17 With project PM Peak SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.003 - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages: Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.96 Vehicle Delay 84.4 Level of Service F ------------------------------------- Sq 0 1 Phase 1 1 Phase 2 1 Phase 3 1 +*/**------------------------------------- + + + ++++ + / \ �+ + +5++++ +> A v ++++ A ++++ v North > ++++> �+ + +' + ++++ + + + + v + ------------------------------------- G/Ca0.417 G/C=0.183 I G/Ca0.087 Ga 48.0" Ga 21.0" Ga 10.0" Y+Ra 5.0" Y+Ra 6.0" Y+Ra 3.0" OFF= 0.0% OFF=65.2% OFFa88.7% C=115 sec Ga 79.0 sec a 68.7% Ya14.0 sec = 12.2% Ped=22.0 sec 19.1% --Lane----Width/ q g/C i Service Rate Ad I I HCMy I-L-J.90%MaxJ Group Lanes Re d Used I OC (vph) 09 Volume v/c Dela S Queue ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ N Approach 30.6 C sans=mesa=asassassasasssasssssaasassassaassa=assssasssaa:arsasssrssaa�saaaaasss 0.390 10 417 211 1 65 723 31.1 1 01 LT+RTI 12/1 10.230 0.530 1 1824 1939 1029 0.031 1 13.0 B+ 525 ft ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- S Approach 120.3 F aaasaa=sassassassssassssasasssasseasaaasssasrysarssaasraaasrasasaaaaaaaaaaaaaaua THJ 0 529 10 4117 1 213 475 20 ft LT+RTI 12/1 10.219 0.530 1824 11939 1 1727 11.180 0.029 1 11.2.9 B+1 825 ft1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- sRaApproach r���asawra�rssssssssaaraarraaaraaassss�ssasrssssssa4r3ar9saaaaaaaaammaa �LT+TH+RT[ 12/1 10.257 10.183 1 1 1 209 1 71 10.300 1 43.9 1 D+1 94 ftl ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- W Approach 41.0 D+ aaaassassa�sssassssssarssasssasaaaasaasassasraaassaasassssssaaaassssaesaeasssssaaa ILT+TH+RT1 12/1 10.240 10.183 1 1 1 218 1 40 10.163 1 41.0 � D+1 53 ftI ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ;;ubvnitted into ii�k: 1 -,-AC record in connection I h Walter Fooman City Clerk, • u • .• Future Conditions Modified Signal Timing Submitted into the pubHe record in connection with item �z�l on Waiter i=oeman City Clerk j 1 -i. 5 `� PH Biscayne/19 Street Rental Apartments 07/16/01 Biscayne Blvd (US 1) /NS 19 St 16:29:31 with project PM Peak (w/ improvement) SIGNAL97/TEAPACIVer 1.001 - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages: Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.90 Vehicle belay 71.8 Level of Service E Sq 21 / North _ -_1Phase2 1 --_-__- IPhase 1Phase 3 - _ - - - - - - - - A +-+ * + + + + + * + + + + + + + .... + + * } C + + + } G + + + + Y v A ++++ A * * v + * * v ------------------------------------- G/C-0.125 I G/Cr0.500 G/Cr0.079 Ga 14.4" Gm 57.5" Gm 9.1" Y+Rr 4.0" Y+Rr 4.0" Y+Rm 4.0" OFF= 0.0% OFFr35.1% OFFr88.6% C=11.5 sac -r-Gr 81.0 sec a 70.4% Ya12.0 sec = 10.4% Pedr22.0 sec = 19.1% -Lane----Width/------g/C-------Service Rate---Adj-----_r--__ Group 1 Lanes Regd Used I @C (vph) @H 1Volumel We J--HCM--J-L-J90%MaxJ Delay S Queue ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ N Approach 20.9 C+ sramrsaaaa=rasr>Arrr=rmmmrrra#mmrmr=mrrmrrmrrrrrmra==rrmr>rrrmrrsmrmrrmaarrrmamaaalr 297 1 326 1 284 10.552 LT+RTI 12/1 10.220 24/2 0.432 10.660 0.125 2155 2273 1256 0.892 1 68.8 1*$+l 353 ft 257 ft1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ S Approach 105.0 F mmammasr>wrrrrrrrrmrrrraPrPrrrmrrr=m=rmissm=mrs=ram:mmaPaaammra�mmrrrmsam>:mra=>zaammssa 06 1 18 1 LT 12/1 24/2 `0.290 10.500 0.599 0.500 1 1124 595 1 1188 2024 10.122 116.6*B 1 825 ft1 -------------"W-A--__------------r----_-__----r-------------------rr----__----- E Approach 58.9 8+ emmmmarmmms�al�ts•rl"ssmrmmrmsar=aaarms=mrrm=mrmmrae:mmr==rrlssmrmrmsrmmm=rrryPraaara RT 12/1 10.287 0.239 0.447 1 41.1 1 ft 63 69 ILT+TH 1 12/1 0.266 10.079 1 41 353 ( 168 10.791. 103.2 F+1- - 101ft1 W Approach 188.0 F armrrrma=s=assmalsrrrmmmmr>4mrmmrrmrsPmrear=mmrrsm■r=ammrwsA>Amrrrmrrsmrrsramaa�rr>s=s1 ILT+TH+RTI-12/1-IO_281-10+079------].-----67_-_-116-11-149-I-1$8+0-I*F-1_173-ftl r, pip WPM 1�11�lyjitli b J' • .w 0 Biscayne/19 Street Rental Apartments 07/16/01 Biscayne Blvd (US 1) /NN 21 St 16:30:20 With project PM Peak (w/ improvement) SIaNAL97/TBAPAC[Ver 1.001 - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages: Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.69 Vehicle Delay 21.2 Level of Service C+ Sq 11 North I Phase -1--I -Phase 2 1 ------------------------- A -------------- A + + + v A ++++ + * * ++++ + *' * v ------------------------- G/Cr0.589 a/Cm0.151 Go 67.7" Cha 17.3" Y+Rr 4.0" Y+Rs 4.0" OFF= 0.0% OFFa81.5% Ca115 sec ar 85.0 sec m 73.9% Y= 8.0 sec w 7.0% Peda22.0 sec = 19.1% --Lane -Width/ ----- ------Service-Rate--Aaj-----------------L--190%M— Group ag/C Lanesl Reqd Used I ®C (vph) ®8 lVolumel v/c De1ay S Queue ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- N Approach 15.3 B 54 LT+RTI12/1 =0.583 024/2 0 390 .589 589 119390 20528 11D29 0�0:513(446 33.8 '1 C+J 325 ft------------------------------------------------------------------------------ S Approach 23.2 C+ aaim##rss#r#srassss=rs=sasssa=#aasmasssasass=ss#masasasssssassass:sasraaaaamaama TLT H+RTI 24/2 0 529 589 001 2157 080 1727 79 525 12/1 10.304 0.589 1 12216 1 10:837 0123 11.6 J*C+J B+ ft ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 48.9 D aaaaassrsa"Ilf�l���l"Itr==ss#a#racersasam##wasasaasa=mrsirrrraawsss===rsaaaasws3aaraam3 �LT+TIi+RT� �2"% 0.357 �0.15D i 1 ! 166 � 71 j0.359 � 48.9 �*D � 97 ftp W Approach 44.9 D+ a=assess#ssaa=assssaaaasssamraa##sssa=sass#rssasaassssass=s#a==ssaassas==saa#aaw ILT+Tx+RT� 12/1 0.240 0.150 � 1 � 173 � 40 0.195 � 44.9 Submitted into ti recordinconnection with item l� on 4�2r�a/ Walter Forman City Clerk 0 • • SITE UTILITY REPORT Inventory And Engineering Information Concerning Site, Storm Drainage, Water Distribution And Sanitary Sewer For: Biscayne Village Development Job No.: 20007034 Prepared for: Finger Biscayne, LLC c/o Vicky Garcia -Toledo, Esq. 200 South Biscayne Boulevard, Suite 2500 Miami, FL 3 3131 Tel: 305-350-2409 Prepared by: FO Fortin, Leavy, Skiles, Inc. Consulting Engineers, Surveyors & Mappers 180 Northeast 168th Street North Miami Beach, Florida 33162-3412 Tel: 305-653-44931 Fax: 305-651-7152 E -Mail Address: fls@bcllsouth.net bellsouth.net July 18, 2001 Submitted into the ssp u: _ record in ponnection with r item �Z on lD •2-9�"• d / Walter Foeman w: City Clerk • L TRACT LOCATIONIZONING The subject site consists of two proposed Tracts "A" and "B" with 1.926 and 2.75 acres .l P P respectively. Both Tracts total area are 4.676 acres and are located on Biscayne Boulevard between N.E. 19'h Street and N.E. 20"h Terrace. The property is bordered by Biscayne Boulevard (US 1/ SR 5) on the west, N.E. 19th Street to the south, N.E. 4"' Avenue to the southeast, North Bayshore Drive and its proposed south extension to the east, and N.E. 20th Terrace to the North. The property is currently zoned R-4 (Multifamly High -Density Residential) and G1 (Restricted commercial) II. EXISTING LAND USE A one-story building currently occupies a portion of the vacant land and it is located on the northwest corner of the site. Also, the City of Miami owns the streets known as N.E. 20th Street and N.E. 20th Street alley that provide accessibility and utility services to these parcels. Both access roadways and building need to be cleared to accommodate the proposed development. III. PROPOSED LAND USE The project development will consist of three buildings with a total of 435 residential apartment units, 19,000 sq. ft. of retail store space and a four (4) level parking garage. A total of 741 parking spaces will be available to service the entire development. Parking is also available under all three buildings. IV. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT The storm drainage disposal system for this site shall meet the requirements first imposed by an Environmental Resource Permit (E.R.P) from South Florida Water Management District that is now delegated to Miami -Dade County D.E.R.M and secondly by Florida Department of Transportation (F.D.O.T.) drainage connection permit. Basically D.E.R.M. or the District shall require that the greater of the first inch of runoff, or 2.5 inches times the percent of impervious will be retained on site to meet the water quality criteria. If the hydraulic conductivity of the soil, as determined from onsite exfiltration tests, is found to be very poor due to environmental or subsurface conditions, then Miami -Dade County D.E.R.M. may agree to lessen the above quality requirement for full on site retention. The Department will require that the first one -inch' generated by the parking garage decks open to the sky, driveways and planter areas be pretreated only and subsequent storm water runoff be disposed by drainage wells. Then, Florida Department of Environmental Protection (F.D.E.P.) permit for deep drainage wells shall be required. Such a permit is issued after the state receives comments from Miami -Dade County Department of Environmental Resources Management (D.E.R.M.). 1f the new 24" drainage wells are drilled to develop a discharge rate of 1,000 gpm considering ground water concentration of chlorine, head differential between fresh water and brackish water and also site elevation constrains, then we can esti ate that about five (5) wells shall be required Submittow record in connecj;L, �v; ;, ,.. . item &E--/ on °' "' al t' :a �. Walter 1=oeman City Clerk • • 0 0 to provide enough flood protection to the new development, surrounding properties and adjacent streets. Flood routings for the 5, 10, 25, and 100 -years event shall be generated to demonstrate to F.D.O.T. that there will be no rainwater overflow into Biscayne Boulevard. Roof drainage and landscape rainfall runoff shall be connected to the back up system made of drainage wells without any pretreatment. Each of the wells shall have its a retention/sedimentation tank equipped with an oil interceptor. The wells and retention tanks combination cost on the order of $35,000 to $40, 000 each. French drains cost about $50.00 to $60.00 per lineal feet. V. WATER AVAILABILITY AND CONNECTION POINTS As described by the Miami -Dade Water & Sewer Department, agency with ownership and approval authority, there is a sixteen (16) inch water main located in Biscayne Boulevard and N.E. 19th Street from which the property owner shall install and connect a sixteen (16) inch water main easterly in N.E. 19th Street and to be interconnected to an existing sixteen (16) inch water main west of North Bayshore Drive. Since the Finger Company will be dedicating for public use that private portion of North Bayshore Drive, the agency is also requiring a sixteen (16) inch water main northerly in North Bayshore Drive and to be interconnected to an existing twelve (12) inch water main south of N.E. 20th Terrace. From this new line a twelve (12) inch water main can run into the property to provide the required domestic, fire and irrigation services. Also, the Department has a 12 -inch water main in N.E. 20`h Terrace. This line can be tapped and extensions can run into the property to provide domestic, fire and irrigation services as well. Existing water lines within the property must be removed and water lines easements abandoned. The availability of water line service for this property is conditional upon the approval of various regulatory agencies and if there is sufficient depth and that there are no obstacles, which would preclude the construction to the water main extension. The proposed development water consumption is as follow: Development 435 Apts.Units 19,000 S.F. of Retail Space Daily Rate Gallonage 200 GPD/UNIT 5 GPD/100 S.F. Total 87,000 GPD 950 GPD Total 87,950 GPD Submitted into tho pudic record in connection with Item on eLO E Waiter Fccman City Cierlc i i 0 VI. SAN. SEWER AVAILABILITY AND CONNECTION POINTS • • As described by the Miami -Dade Water & Sewer Department, agency withownership and approval authority, there is an eight (8) inch gravity sewer main located in N.E. 20t11 Street and an eight (8) inch gravity sewer located within said property, which must be removed and/or relocated and a fifteen (15) foot wide easement abandoned. A new sanitary main can be constructed along the entire east side Biscayne Boulevard to the southern side of N.E. 20th Terrace and then run east and terminate in an existing manhole in N.E. 201h Terrace, at about the project northeast corner. Sanitary lateral connections can be made available from the new sanitary extension to service the buildings located on the perimeter of the owner's property. Other connection points are available from N.E. 19th Street and North Bayshore Drive sanitary system. The availability of sanitary sewer service for this property is conditional upon the approval of various regulatory agencies and if there is sufficient depth and that there are no obstacles, which would preclude the construction to the sanitary main extension. The proposed development sewage flow is as follow: Average Daily Flow: Average Flow: Peak Flow: 61 GPM X 4.0 (4.0 Approx. Peak Flow) = VII. SOLID WASTE GENERATION Residential Apartments 435 Apts. @ 8 lbs/day/Apt= Retail Space: 19,000 sq. ft. @ 4 lbs./100 sq. ft./day= I 87,000 GPD 61 GPD 244 GPM 3,480 lbs/day 760 lbs/day Total 4,240 lbs/day Submitted irau i.;-_,, record In connvciiosl tvith Item Aon Io2-c-, o Walter Foerrman City Clerk 0 • • Biscayne Village Economic Impact Analysis Submitted to: City of Miami Prepared For: Finger Development Prepared by: SHARPTON, BRUNSON & COMPANY, P.A. One Southeast Third Avenue Suite 2100 Miami, Florida 33131 (305) 374-1574 Submitted into tllu Public: record in conn ction item on 71 Walter Foeman City Clerk • • • 0 0 Biscayne Village TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE(S) THE PROJECT OVERVIEW 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction 2 Summary of Benefits 3 OBJECTIVES AND DEFINITIONS Objectives 5 Definition of Economic and Tax Impact 5 Direct and Indirect Effects 5 Measures of Economic Impact 6 Description of Results 7 DISCUSSION OF THE RESULTS BY ECONOMIC INDICATORS Impact Indicators 8 Results of Indicators 8 Impact of Construction 8 Impact of Ongoing Operations 9 Impact on Local Tax Revenues 9 Analysis by Economic Indicators 9 Employment 9 Wages 10 Output 10 Local Taxes 11 Public Sector Cost 12 Impact Fees 12 EXHIBITS 13 Exhibit I: Summary of Economic Impact Exhibit II: Impact and Other Fees Submitted into b, record in conneca011 w'rj Waiter Foernan City Clerk • • • 0 Project Overview Biscayne Village is located on Biscayne Blvd. at 19th Street in the city of Miami, Florida (the Project) . The Project consists of 437 apartment units, 19,400 square feet of retail space and 701 parking spaces. The total lot area is 232,332 square feet (7.08 acres). Excellent area demographics and a booming local economy enhance Biscayne Village's Club's status as one of the future premier multifamily opportunities. Targeted for completion in 2004, Biscayne Village will set a new standard of excellence in South Florida apartment living. It is located on one of North Bayshore Drive's last undeveloped bay -front parcels. North Bayshore Drive is poised to become the premier residential corridor north of Downtown Miami. With the new Miami -Dade Performing Arts Center currently under development a few blocks away, Biscayne Village will be situated in one of the most desirable spots in Miami. 0 Interstate 95 is less than half a mile to the west, while near -by Interstate 395 and Interstate 1-195 provide quick access to Miami Beach. The property is only six miles from Miami International Airport, and a short distance north of the Port of Miami. The property's proximity to 1-95 and ease of access to the surrounding transportation network augments its bay -front location and creates a uniquely convenient and desirable address. Submitted into the public record in connection it Item A� on �- Walter Foeman City Clerk C7 140 � 0 0 0 Introduction 'f wlip—CL 'l,'i�+� .moi -5i e This document represents an in-depth This analysis encompasses the economic and tax benefits analysis of entire Project and estimates the the developmental and operation of a economic and tax benefits for first class apartment rental complex both its developmental and and retail facilities. operational phases. The Project currently contemplated is comprised of the following components: ❑ 437 units of high-quality residential. ❑ 19,400 square feet of retail. ❑ 701 parking spaces. Submittoc record In conno-cilorl with Item on �/ Walter Foeman City Clerk F4 Summary of Benefits The Project will bring significant economic benefits to the city of Miami (the City). This section summarizes the impact of the project on employment, public sector revenues and other economic benefits as a result of the development. Employment Employment considerations include the direct employment resulting from the Project. Peak developmental construction phase employment will be for approximately 220 employees and the Project management is expected to employ 21 people for on-going maintenance and operations of the facilities. In addition, businesses leasing retail space in the building are estimated to employ 37 people. To compute the wages associated with the new employment we started with budgeted data directly related to the developmental and operational phases of the Project, and we incorporated data from our research on retail sales. Total Direct and indirect impacts expected from wages associated with the new development approximate the following: The estimate of the public sector revenues associated with the development includes taxes and other revenues generated directly by the Project. Although public sector costs are important elements in measuring fiscal impact, these benefits have not been quantified in this document. This analysis only measures the benefits derived from the development. Annual tax revenue expected to be created totals $1,764,804. The estimate of total economic impact is measured by total output. This analysis measures the economic impact of developmental costs and ongoing, operational expenditures. To determine the effect of respending within the City, we utilized a multiplier to compute total direct and indirect benefits. Total output expected to be generated, as a result of the developmental and operational phases of the Project will approximate the following: record 1n connoL;t� n t�itut 1tem�2 / on Walter Foernnn City Clerk i 0 M Summary of Benefits Significant Community Benefits: ➢ Jobs Wages Taxes Economic Activity Residents' and Retail/Business Office Employees' Spending impacting Local Businesses: ➢ Food ➢ Recreation/Entertainment ➢ Transportation ➢ Retail The following table and charts summarize the economic impact of the Brickell Village development. Economic Activity Stimulated Output Wages Taxes Jobs Created • CONSTRUCTION PERIOD ANNUAL IMPACT RECURRING $ 97, 313, 507 $ 8,967,091 25,109,870 3,062,044 1.764.804 $122,423.377 $ 13,798,937 165 58 SubmittuL, record In Item on fid. Walter Foeman City Clerk .19 • • Objectives And Definitions Objectives The objective of this analysis is to provide information on the various benefits created by the Project and to prepare an estimate of such benefits to the City. 0ur analysis is based on an economic model, which estimates economic and tax impacts of various projects on a designated area. The model is specifically tailored to the City of Miami (the City). Definition of Economic and Tax Impact The construction and subsequent operation of the Project will create important benefits within the City. These benefits include new income, new jobs, new tax revenue and new economic activity impacting upon every sector of the local economy. Moreover, through the multiplier effect of respending and reinvesting, indirect economic benefits are added to the direct benefits brought about by initial construction expenditures, the expenditures from ongoing operations and new spending at the retail enterprises. Direct and Indirect Effects The total economic impact of public and private projects and policies on a region does not end with the impact from the initial construction expenditures; the continued benefits to the local economy must also be considered. Income to firms furnishing construction materials and services is subsequently converted into employee salaries, material purchases, investment in plant and equipment, savings, profits, purchases of services, and a variety of other economic activities. Income to laborers is subsequently • respent for purchasing of food, housing, transportation, education, entertainment, medical and dental services, clothing, personal services, and a wide variety of other goods and services. Furthermore, income to the governmental unit is respent as salaries, purchases, and support of a variety of programs, including education, transportation, and social services. In turn, individuals, firms, and governments furnishing these goods and services again spend their income for more purchases, salaries, investments, and savings. In this manner, indirect benefits result each time the initial sum is respent, and the additional sum available in the local economy induces further job creation, business development and savings. Quantification of these indirect benefits has been the object of considerable economic study. Because economic relationships are so complex in our modern society, no single area or political unit is a completely self-contained economic unit. Therefore, purchases from other areas and political units are necessary, and goods services are exported in return. As purchases are made from other units, some of the benefits of economic respending are lost to the local economy. Ultimately, a smaller and smaller portion of the initial sum would remain, until, after several rounds of respending, an insignificant sum is left. Submitted Into the publlc record in connection with item z// on Walter f-oeman City Clork E 0 N Objectives And Definitions The indirect effects can be viewed as a set of "ripples" in the economy. Indirect, like direct, resources require labor, materials, equipment and services for their production to induce further job creation and spending of wages. The "ripple" of the indirect effect multiplies the original impact of the purchase. The common measure of the magnitude of the "ripple" effect is called a multiplier. A multiplier measures the total magnitude of the impact on each particular economic indicator as a multiple of the initial, direct effect. For instance, a multiplier of "1" would signify no "ripple" effects as the total impact is 1 times the initial impact, while a multiplier of "2" would imply that the total impact is 2 times the direct effect. The actual magnitude of a multiplier depends on the likelihood the goods and services purchased in a region would be produced in, or provided from the region. The model we used to estimate the total economic impact incorporates a multiplier developed by utilizing past consumption and production patterns in the City. 0 1 There will be significant economic benefit derived from the expenditures of the residents of the Project on eating, drinking, grocery, recreation, retail etc. This report does not include the economic impact of such expenditures. 0 Measures of Economic Impact Various measures can be used to indicate the impact of a policy or project on a region. Specifically, for this study, they are the increases in local employment, wages, tax revenue and output that result. Definitions of these measures are as follows: Em ,a�loyment is measured full-time equivalent jobs. Wages include wages, salaries, and proprietor's income only. They may include non -wage compensation, such as pensions, insurance, and other fringe benefits. Wages are assumed to be expended by households in the area at which the wage-earner works. Local taxes include additional revenues from both ad valorem and non ad valorem assessments. Direct expenditures include those sums expended for land acquisition, site preparation and all hard and soft costs associated with a project. Indirect expenditures are those sums expended within the local economy as a result of the "ripple" effect described earlier. Ou#pu# describes total economic activity, and is essentially equivalent to the sum of direct and indirect expenditures (exclusive of wages and taxes). Submitted into the public record in connoction with item on Walter Foeman j 1 `J i City Clerk • • • E Objectives And Definitions Description of Results For the purpose of describing the total economic benefits of the Project, the related expenditures and economic activity stimulated have been broken into two categories: Developmental Annual Recurring Developmental expenditures include those expenditures related to the design and construction phase of the Project and related amenities. Annual recurring activities stimulated are those expenditures incurred in connection with the ongoing operation of the Project, and the sales and expenditures of the retail enterprises leasing space at the Project. 0 Subi;+ ,,__ , . Aic record in item on Walter Foeman City Clock 7 • • • 0 Discussion Of The Results By Economic Indicators Impact indicators We measured the Project's impact on four commonly used indicators of economic activity. Those indicators are: Jobs Wages Total output local taxes Results of Indicators Exhibit I details the Project's direct and indirect impact on the above economic indicators for Miami. A summary of such impact follows: DEVELOPMENT (One Time) OUTPUT Direct $ 51,784,540 Indirect 45.528,967 97,313,507 ANNUAL Operational: Direct $ 2,831,760 Indirect 2,489,682 Retail 1,705,648 The economic indicator most commonly measured, and publicly reported on to gauge the economic impact of a public project is output. The impact of a project on the indicator output is often referred to as the project's economic impact. Impact of Construction The site preparation and construction expenditures, including soft costs and impact fees are estimated at $58 million. Such activity will create approximately 165 new full time equivalent jobs and employ a maximum of 220 workers during peak periods.The workers will earn approximately $13.3 million in direct wages. WAGES TAXES EMPLOYMENT $13362,000 165 11,747,879 $ 25,109,870 165 $ 707,940 $1,764,804 21 622,421 810,183 37 $ 7,017,090 $ 2,140,544 $1,764,804 58 Submitted into the public,8 record In connection with Item ALL on Walter Foernan `�- ._ 0 j City Clek • 0 0 Discussion Of The Results By Economic Indicators Impact of Ongoing Operations and Retail Enterprises As a result of the on-going operation and maintenance of the Project, Miami will gain approximately 21 new, permanent, full-time equivalent jobs. The wages of the workers who obtain these positions will provide an impact of approximately $707,940 annually. The retail ent ° prises are estimated to create 37 permanent, full-time equivalent jobs. The wages of the workers employed by the retail tenants will provide an impact of approximately $921 thousand annually. The total expenditures for the Project's operations, and the retail sales will provide a new, permanent impact of $8.96 million annually to the City's economy. This impact consists of the effects of new retail sales and the direct expenditures from the maintenance, security and day-to-day operation of the Project, and the multiplied effects of such spending thus creating indirect benefits. Impact on Local Tax Revenues As a result of the construction and operation of the Project, various state, city and city governments and agencies would gain an estimated annual tax benefit of $1.75 million. Analysis by Economic Indicators Our analysis of the economic and tax benefits of the Project was done by each major phase of the Project. We identified the major phases to be developmental and operational. The effects on economic indicators used to measure benefits (employment, wages, output and taxes) were computed for each phase. Employment Employment is one of the most important economic benefits of the Project. It is one of the most accessible and direct benefits for the City's residents and it's residents and. is a primary means by which developmental, operational and maintenance expenditures generate indirect economic benefits. A portion of this employment occurs on-site as a result of new spending at the retail enterprises, and a portion is derived from on-going operations of the Project. Further employment is generated off-site by the expenditures of employees of the Project and businesses located in the Project, at area businesses. As can be seen in Exhibit I, total short-term (developmental) employment will average 165 employees over a twenty -month period and a total on-going employment will average 57. The total on-going positions can be summarized as follows: Management Security Parking Maintenance/Facilities Retail This analysis determines the economic benefits to the City by identifying such benefits for each of the phases. Submitted into €ijo public record in connection witty item �., .! on ld ••2.s-- o ( I Walter Foeman J rk • • C 0 i Discussion Of The Results By Economic Indicators Wages The analysis deemed wages are a direct by-product of employment. As discussed in the above section, both on-site and off- site jobs are created. There were both temporary and permanent in nature. To compute the wages associated with the new employment we started with budgeted data directly related to the developmental and operational phases of the Project, and we incorporated data from our research on retail sales. Employment, such as construction related employment, was obtained directly from construction estimates. These numbers were tested for reasonableness. Output The output generated, as a result of the development and operations of the Project, is caused by the following type of expenditures: Development costs expended in the City (100%) a Annual operational expenditures of management company A New spending in the locality by employees of businesses located in the Project To incorporate the impact of dollars being respent and/or reinvested in the City, a multiplier was applied to total direct output. A multiplier of 1.8792 was used to determine total direct and indirect output created by the Project. This multiplier indicates that for every $100 spent in Miami, another $187.92 will be respent or reinvested in Miami. This multiplier was obtained from the Dade City Planning Department. Direct output from the developmental phase of the Project is primarily a result of developer costs. These costs include land acquisition, site preparation and soft and hard costs relating to the Project's construction. To determine the total output we determined what development costs were expected to be or had been spent in Miami. Total direct output during the development phase is $51.7 million. Total indirect output created by the direct respending in Miami is $45.5 million. Thus total Miami Output from the development of the Project is $97 million. The final component of output results from the direct operating expenditures of the Project, and the indirect benefits created as a result of the multiplier effect on direct output. The Developer provided us with an annual operating budget for the Project. An overall assumption was made that all expenditures would be spent initially in the City. 10 �tbrr2i�c" puhlic record in ccr mn� , 'on 1j?�3�.�'i item or] 2ss d� 4�laltcr I✓�ycrrE:xr� �:�` Y � `� .ti � `� CRY Clot • • • Discussion Of The Results By Economic Indicators Output (Contd.) The total operating expenditures incorporate all estimated expenses of the ongoing operation of the Project. The impact of the retail enterprises was measured separately as an economic indicator. To incorporate the potential respending and reinvesting in Miami, the multiplier effect was measured. By applying a multiplier of 1.8792 to the total direct output from operating expenditures and the retail enterprises, we determined total output (direct and indirect) from on-going operating expenditures and retail sales. Total direct output created from retail sales and operating expenditures is $4.77 million. Total indirect output created from retail sales and operating expenditures is $4.19 million. Total output created from ongoing operations and retail enterprises is approximately $8.96 million. Local Taxes A key and significant benefit generated from the development and operation of the Project is taxes. Several types of tax revenue will be generated from this project including ad valorem taxes. Specific ad valorem taxes include real and personal property taxes. Other taxes include occupational taxes and community development taxes. New real property taxes will be assessed on the Project. The assessment is based on a predetermined mileage rate being applied to the taxable value of the real property. We computed real property taxes for the developmental phase based on the cost of the development of the Project. This assessment base is very conservative since tax on real property typically is assessed on appraised values and not actual cost. The basis for ongoing taxes is also overall cost. The mileage rate was obtained from the City Tax Collectors office relative to the Project's location. The projected annual real property taxes are approximately $1.7 million. Total ad valorem taxes assessed by Miami -Dade County are allocated based on mileage rates to certain governmental entities. Listed below is the allocation of projected tax revenue. City Operating $ 579,679 School Operating 560,814 County Operating 370,632 Debt Service - City 82,492 Debt Service -County 42,019 South Florida Water 38,475 Library Operating 22,621 School Debt Service 58,969 Florida Inland Navigation 2,642 Environmental Projects 6,445 TOTAL $ 1,764,804 Stibmittod into tho pi.-iblic 11 record in conrtor� �{n Rem on L Asa.........-_ Walter 1. City Cleric 0 0 Discussion of The Results By Economic * N Indicators Local Taxes (Contd.) Although not quantified, the City, through its receipt of allocated state sales taxes will receive an additional benefit as a result of the development and operation of the Project, and from the retail enterprises. Public Sector Costs Impact fees Very significant factors in measuring the economic impact on a specific region of a project are impact and other required development fees. A summary of these fees are listed below: City of Miami Developmental Impact Fee City of Miami Developmental Admin Fee v Dade City Impact Fee Administrative Fee Building Permit Fee Installation Energy Fee Other Fees For the purpose of this economic impact analysis, fees are included as a part of the direct development cost (output). Impact fees total approximately $1.6 million and other fees total approximately $1.38 million. These fees are shown in detail in Exhibit Il. Submitted into the public record in connection with ROM on 14. ZJ- a♦ Walter f=oeal�l o City ClcrR 12 Exhibit List Exhibit I Summary of Economic Impact Exhibit 11 Impact and Other Fees Subr-.1lRod 13 rocord h'i item o n city clink, r1 • 0 Exhibit -1 BISCAYNE VILLAGE ECONOMIC BENEFITS STUDY SUMMARY OF ECONOMIC IMPACT EXHIBIT I 14 record in Item P on Walter Foeim n City Clerk OUTPUT WAGES EMPLOYMENT TAXES__ DIRECT DEVELOPMENTAL $ 51,784,540 $ 13,362,000 165 OPERATIONAL 2,831,760 707,940 21 $ 1,764,804 RETAIL 1,940,000 921,500 37 TOTAL DIRECT 14,991,440 223 1,764,804 56,556,300 INDIRECT DEVELOPMENTAL 45,528,968 11,747,870 OPERATIONAL 2,489,683 622,421 RETAIL 1,705,648 810,183 TOTAL INDIRECT 13,160,474 49,724,299 TOTAL BENEFITS $ 28,171,914 223 $ 1,764,804 $ 106,280,600 TOTAL DEVELOPMENTAL $ 97,313,508 $ 25,109,870 165 TOTAL OPERATIONAL 5,321,443 1,330,361 21 $ 1,764,804 TOTAL RETAIL 3,645,648 1,731,683 37 TOTAL BENEFITS $ 28,171,914 223 $ 1,764,804 $ 106,280,600 14 record in Item P on Walter Foeim n City Clerk 0 E Exhibit - II BISCAYNE VILLAGE EXHIBIT II ECONOMIC BENEFITS STUDY IMPACT AND OTHER FEES IMPACT AND OTHER FEES: A. Development Square Footages: Square Footage 1) Total gross building area (with parking) 794,066 2) Maximum development area (FAR) 2,039,990 3) Residential F.A.R. 560,882 4) Retail F.A.R. 19,400 5) Lobby area 3,000 6) Gross parking area 213,784 B. Impact Fees: Amount 1) City of Miami Development Impact Fee (Ord - 10426) $ 406,277 2) Development Impact Administration Fee (Ord - 10426) 12,188 3) Miami -Dade County Roadway Impact Fee 409,032 4) Miami -Dade County School Impact Fee 782,334 Total of all Impact Fees $ 1,609,831 C. Non -Impact Fees: 1) Miami Dade W.A.S.A. "connection fees" $ 617,706 2) Building Permit Fee 450,755 3) Installation Energy Fee 225,377 4) Major Use Special Permit Application Fee 30,000 5) Miami -Dade County Code Compliance 21,500 6) Radon Gas Fee 11,269 7) Fire Plan Review Fee 21,411 8) Ground Cover Fee 1,309 9) Land Use/Zoning 2,037 10) Zoning Review for Building Permit Fee 60 11) Certificate of Occupancy Fee 250 12) Application Fee 35 Total of all Non -Impact Fees $ 1,381,709 Total of all Feesfor Project $ 2,991,540 Source: City of Mari Planning, Building and Zoning Department. Mani Dade County Irrpact Fees 15 Submitted Into the public record in connlJcaoi P --/ on 1tOrn Walter Fooffia" ,lty Clerk 0 • c* • 5 1 0 0 1 3 17 M M 24Z :7 • 0 0 • ARCHITECTURE: COHEN, FREEDMAN, ENCINOSA & ASSOC. ARCHITECTS, P.A. 8085 N -W. 155TH STREET MIAMI, FLORIDA 33016 TEL. (3D5) 828-3999 FAX (305) 826-4155 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE: BRADSHAW GILL & ASSOCIATES LANDSCAPE ARCEITECTURE PLANNING P.A. 4337 SEAGRAPE DRIVE LAUDERDALE -BY -THE -SEA. FLORIDA 33308 TEL. (954) 772-0724 FAX (954) 772-8417 PROJECT DATA A. MAIN TOWER PRELIMINARY DESIGN FOR: FINGER DEVELOPMENT MIAMI, F�.ORIDA B. LOFT BUILDINGS 1. s F. I a - rcaen , unvrn uncui...a .. tcru, ns 2 L _ ♦_ xs ea e . uz : ,t-eo - se � cy ttae w t I s a, tteo ee a t^ - 1.- u F PEP.AIITTtb (e 1 - tz nm unrzo ro W s s. BL'IIDIN'C` FOtPRIN't C. PROJECT TOTAL —1bnaitted Intc L: c0rd1nconEDct;cr, Walter Foam CityCterk INDEX OF SHEETS ARCHITECTURAL. DRAWINGS A-0 TITLE SHEET GROUND FLOOR PIN 1/30" SCALE A-2 SECOND THRU TFIRD LEVELS FLOOR PLAT: I/3D SCALE A-3 FOURTH THP.0 SIXTH LEVELS FLOOR PLAN 1/30" SCUF A-4 SEVENTH THRU FIFTEENTH LEVELS FLOOR PLAN 1/30' SCALE A-5 ROOF PIAN 1/30" SCALE A-8 1,OWER TOWER PIAN 1/8' SCALE. LO'FER TOWFE PLAN 1/8' SCALE A D TY?IC.AL LOFT PIAN 1/8" SCALE TYPICAL LOFT PUN 1/8" SCALE A-10 UPPER TOWER PUN I/8' SCALE A-11 UPFER T wLR PLAN 1/B' SCALE A-12 NORTH k WEST ELEVATIONS 1/20SCALE -13SOUTH & EAST ELEVATIONS 1/20" SCALE SECTIONS h1 & OD 1/20" SCALE A-15 RENDERINGS LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS 11-1 LANDCAPE SITE PWN L-3 LANDSCAPE LEGENDS AND SCHEDULES NDTES. 1. PAR NG STRIPE DETAILS WILL BE DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE GUIDE) AND STANDARD)' OF THB CITY DF' MIAMI FOR BOTH HANDICAPPED AND STANDARD SPACES. 2. WHEELSTOPS/CONT, CURBS WILL BE DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE, WITH THE GUIDES ,AND STANDARDS OF THE CPU OF MIAMI. 3, PERIPHERY LANDSCAPING WILL BE DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE GUIDES .WD STANDARDS OF THE CITY OF MDVAI. I0 .4'fRACNsO ,. A7 z 11 PARf.GCITY nem c. m OF LUMI , 4WRCE OF HEARW O BOARDS V s., woo PLANS REWI 12 IAADINcw� �IIIDI dd W V Q _j J 2> 6w ED W Z Q Q z U` Wcf/y)� D- W • • • N.E. 20TH TERRACE --- - Von P rr'J • _ .u� N ART t NO, AP Poo S LDECK BAo I e O 4' LUL Poo, 4 LEVRL ! A'9, •...� r i m°a°'.°>w,,,, PARKING GARAGE 'J 6 i f UB I I u TL >� 1 j R� I 6 ; LocKExs Mwam s I —i<77D— o - ,zerwRCEco xr 7 11 j i 061 _ e TTo. c —— —— — ' - II If NOTA .PART / X - — as e�w rm i L NE.19TH ST c — Gf _ML _ - a, P.E GROUND LEVEL — c L 7 Sub FIRST LEVEL 1:30• SCALE i3f1 ii reco (Pa'" PG. 4B) c o�� vGlx K C4RFF�Ei . f1 rd in4v u� Pz o�C%, 1 A-1 Walter j "°"2014 • J � o al " — - - - - - -- NE20TH TERRACE. - - -- - --- - - a N m. m T l\ Ile — ql I Z � q mn� - ., . s.esa .....,.. •y. � NOT A PART z Z ._ II' I =s I{ • L gI `- POOL I. _ _..- \ 4LEVEL -❑ srmmrsv Pe,rtK US SPACE L� vii CI HE - a i I I wcseRs _ a r- -mI I L� U .. xI I weer l r I I i rI I RsrAa� sera I if I! j ucwe —D 6€ I I I 1 — =IIO 0.11 0 I � 4 e I I I® I I I I ® � I ! I I NOT A PART LIPAM' AR I;,HwS�C ,) ¢ J t4 > L— ul 6 Iwo I - -- - - 6 - - --._. - - NE 19TH ST.___ms " — / 9 } OPMEOF11PA1i1N0 OAN PLAN- newEw �U _I 1 Uj a m - --- - - -- - w I k PARR / GROUND LEVEL / FIRST LEVEL 1-30' SCALE / Submitted into the �t)1lC, 0 a record in , H / A�I{\ C 0(P.H. 2 .I (. (P.&�140 PG•4B) POP�)R 0 /connection item P�/ IO • A 1 Waiter Foe :yenCity `� Clerk .® F - -I LA I• I • -- - - NE20TH TERRACE Q m i _.. ^ I I IP el III _ z NOT A PART - _. ....,, ';.: � W I{I • •+tu.• U m I m Q POOLR �°TIi u' 7 ❑ - w x POOL z - 4 LEVEL n w E PARKIN• GARAGE k I _ II p9s`,i z I II w z J J W _ _ R TI � 1 Z I li II I W I� I • I --®- - d' 0110 DI10 - }.� I r -m I I f o ,_.. I I I ` I I - , NOT A PART I I, I, f YpIRR A p F R \ z W ® J O 2F LIU a: LLJ 10E �9ym LL -i Z N.E.19TH ST. / 2nd & 3rd LEVELS 1:30' SCALE- - -- --- Subrt�ltted into the / public \ _� „ ,• C o R A P. R R record in connectio EPe. R M. W / \ - item pz / on Walter 1 oema City Clerk ti � i� �,,—� C) -- - - Q N.E. 20TH TERRACE „ ' { R we ,Me I NOT A P uj U = a i _Y _ r I rl =— m EES � I� A r �'- 4 LEVEL PARMI G \ -�❑ ecDO wrt ❑ �� II 'Z I GA LG. BELOON - _ - 3 z _ 1 i i O 01 9 1= w � II —IIS I U Wd ! _I I I I ' I 11 Z — O I 1 O (S)I 1 O i II II a I!! -- I NOT A PART >HI! Il alxarax I I I I PBafi P0. 4) ,1 , � Q I ��-Ia` M=1� / ro ----- �w. --,, --- ZWo e - LL 9 f y J Z < -------------- N.E. 19TH 3T. - — - - _ 4th THRU 6th LEVELSg� _ / J SC L y PAR % 130' SCALE Suhrgted into the Rch6ie.� rteecmo Pm connection �tuiv,on \ f r PG. A),E Z ' Warier F A._ n LJ lu - ------ - - ---- - ---. -- ----- vi -- _ -- _ --- - N.E. 20TH TERRACE Q H E3 z m I II_1 I 'I a _ l © Ir o z o; - - - NOT r � - n �y I i � 6 --1 �IIIZ �f m E p BLDG{ •B ,1 — — — - l k — I'� 6 STDRIES ° 2TD,DITS HS , _ I_ of I L -- g \ w 120 UN -I-- + _ Po01I - ./ 4 LEVEL PARKING — — 1. I BARRAGE BELOW J LJ I w LWUSCAPH AR&l _� '- e� - I ___ I ;seg9we mc91 ._ ,---_... `.. Z Z -- - li II — = I W al Ii iI -- x I It oil i I, 15 i - _ H �1 If II uRHHw z 'aLncIIIc' _ e sTs gam! I.a - _ - - W ' I- ss °iP" i i O I 1 e• I I S a� 1 I - � I ® " _ EL - II 1 - - 1 _ I! NOT A PART II � li Q W I"4> W a .n z i --rL _11 acwcn+-� �� a z A\ Jffl s /0 W� �ZLL ..- - - -�- - - -- - N.E 79TH ST.- - -".��(r• Face oPm clvonNa Q I 7th THRU 15th LEVELS J 0 Liao' scnLESc;,r[7Sitt2d\into the\p tCiC ° cb cy I P.H lb PG 48) ° °�e z Po. e>R ` r ncard in nnect a EAr F - i item 0z- / + an A.4 Waiter rce • • • a — I ICAI � o �. NE. 20TH TERRACE I �3 .. r NOT PART _ N I I c {. a J ',' BLD JY I r❑ Il W BLDG 'BR', B.S...� - __ . p b — � _ --- 4 LEVEL PARKING' ---- ST DRIES li --- Q oac ❑ I \ vy8i k GARAGE BELOW �I _ �� ❑ ❑ I I I • = Z z I II �- - j 1. al BLDG A 15 STbmEs ___ _. __ fr J n � I I � I I i • 2E UNITS ;• z I i !➢ 16 I _ HLDcI--j� 'c' cE - s sT - — c a _ _ - I _J I I NOT A PART J ¢ W p > f Ai RAY R F i \ z W WOfr o r -- z O �_- Z N.E.19 TH ST. i m: — � � — P A E R E' ROOF PLAN 1'30' -SCALE crt'F . SGI�-rued rnt0fh 7 ' SRACfA'N) CORAPARR L L e record in ^ ti pp��( corsneon cd (P9. (AG1�a[ • Welter Fosr'. A.5 V n _ - em Q a UNIT B2a UNIT 1225 S.F. LN IT Al' UNIT Al 1504 S.F. UNIT UNIT Bl ,a � - _ 708 S.F. 788 S.F. 1144 S.F. Q , • r -, i. .. [� - .. - � SII I W L V y F-1 — b -.,L.. - `� ! ! UNIT B5 I Q 1340 S.F- a G ® ® e _ UNIT NITA2 — UAIT A3 3 c UNIT B2 - Q it 1255 S.F. _ • j - UNIT A3 1050 S.F. L ji UNIT Al W 788 S.F 5 r i - O ,JI UNIT UNIT Bl T- W z R! 1144 S-F. _ _ _ _ _ 1144 S.F. Q Q Qir - Z J _ LL W. 1, I • LOWER NORTH SIDE TOWER PLAN LVLS 2-6 1/8" SCALE Submitted into the pubic 0 - record In Connec,,'c:-1 lI item Pz-/ 0.1 /0.2-57.0/ L Walter Fac-'all J -L - a a city Calk r � m �.� < C - UNIT Bl UNIT B1 C I �� m 1144 S.F. 1144 SF. 'w I L UNIT Al UNIT Al (� 788 S.F. 7B8 S_N_ — -- --- - 5 - - -- w i �— Ja_ a - UNIT B3 ELECT r .I 1210 S.F ROOM r} _ I • l'-�_>� _. ` .— — _-. 11.44 S.F. L__J i LJ 1144 S.F.e��oee>� A4 ® I UNIT B6 W 12 f w I.I 32 S.F. - C I G i I KV 41t-14 UNIT Ala UNIT Ala i i � �� Qui 788 ST. 788 S.F. -- UNIT Bl UNIT Bl w UNIT B4 1144 S F 44 SF D 1390 S.F. UNIT Cl 4 W O 1504 S.F. LL — Z W Q z b cm oc rmacsr d LL MIL LOWER TOWER PLAN -- y/SOLTH iFjeb into f record in conn ite�rt z -i o zr�i ;3 — A-7 Walter FG,- -� I• I a -, 2D,4 1 0 0 a? F Z M IL 0 W z W 00 Uj w z°i - LL w dL CO, IF M1l .1 OFFICE OF NEARING 801Ap.0 i.� pLL.NS P.,^/IRY Submitted Into the public, } TYPICAL LOFT PLAg-_ oo«.W record In connection e+t5� ALDG 's• AVIS z-6 1�8 scALE itersi �Z / on /o' &5 0f Wafter Fea; g ��nr�. city cera slim a A-8 I —2M4-1 0 0 0 rn rn -94 z z o U U- 0 O J- atW > z W � Qw w W z - �wZ crtv a:.,'vaes� Q eoan d� wn TYPIC_ AL L_0_FT PLAN_ o BLDG 'B' LLS 2 6 1/8 SCALE Su'M tied into the duh!^c fecc;d '^ cortne v,,-, fte Waite � - � � % � � FA.9 0 1 0 UPPER TOWER PLAN Submitted int® the pwic NORTH SIDE LVLS 7-15 1/8" SCALE record in conned - Rem on Waiter Foe -.a. v 0 _: IL 0 W z W v� aWo 20 J V LL WCL Q CRV OF MAM LL 2 OFFICE OF fi RMG.CAp ^ 1 0 LL LII : L5 I - e UNIT Bl - UNIT B1 1144 S F 1144III', �I W y UNIT Al UNIT Al ~ I 788 S F. _ 788 S.F. A - I W I - w ;NIT B3 !'j eLFcr CD 1210 S.F. Room \ V ® UNIT Bl UNIT Bl- l i 11 -- 1144 S . 1144 S.F77. ULi .:i UNIT A4 I ` ❑ - .. 7 1045 S.F. - B6 UNIT CW 1232 S.F.071 dt W L L.L _ A , -.. UNIT ala UNIT la IL -- W _� 789 S_F 788 S. F_�Q UNIT B1 UNIT _F w UNIT B9 1144 S.F. 7149 IF O m n 390 S.F. — 'UNIT 5 04 .iMW M I- Z V W z g jUPPER TOWER PLAN �V�°` ', u':'c'�into the �'11h� ^ � recd in �d in ccnre/ SOUTH SIDE L 8" SCALE rscvVLS 7-I5 1 on Z5 Walter r A-11 • • • i AM o FE E ti �LE LE E]1II� � E FR 1-e m m FPPq TTT --- - -- - - - - m 17, T r W m R g s e a o - a T 6 -., o SECTION A -A v 1:20' SCALE m� BIr�,i EB LLLL a 0 II� -T W Mal— -'L EE �L F i W u 77 a..• m _J p O MZ ILI I c.wce ion .0 'T'" _ c cuuce AIw E.n m •. - �i Z�F 111M.11 �y PIJ.NS F7 _ _. - _ vnwvc c.w.ce . � ¢ y� _%'O SECTION B—B SUbM tted into the pubjlc 1:20' SCALE record in connec`eon- iten, 4-2L-1— on 60-d� - � Water Fc,.. A.14 E VIEW LOOKING NORTH-EAST VIEW LOOKING SOUTH—WEST Into the oubt'c record in con,<. Item or Walter Poe r! -TL .:d z z CW 0 1 QW 0 > LL 2 an Fa W rr <w 0 a11 :iz w M IL OL <m �A.15 VIE E VIEW LOOKING NORTH-EAST VIEW LOOKING SOUTH—WEST Into the oubt'c record in con,<. Item or Walter Poe r! -TL .:d z z CW 0 1 QW 0 > LL 2 an Fa W rr <w 0 a11 :iz w M IL OL <m �A.15 U BUILDING 'B' J N.E. 20TH STREET IGSF im ® m s^u BUILDING OUTPARCEL 46 ov v © !• . © !!�itl ----- MATCH_INE SEE SHEET -7 P — SOD k FpOL iER illi " BRADSHAW GUL &Ae6DCIATIe rrsow I]T ]v�eleTliw Retll�3A]0I` m...ess4mmsA D.ae,mwana FAxss4m,ln \ \\ \ 3A000ST��t 9 JULY2 01 CRY OF MIAMI VH.. \ \ M 5 OFFICE OF NEARING BOARDS AANS REVIEIY _ cCr[ \\ „ co . tied Ift the pub,;c record 17 corsRec;c uF'^ items �Z -; �N P-1 Waiter " .... n � 'z _ — ' SCALE: I" = 20'_C" TREESMALMS BI DECORATNE GRATES SIDEIWLA`L, > II w J D 0 m I l 0 I II • w z .r O In l I I II � II O II IXO O II Cs I 1� C 1' II I �-E S � i BUILDING 'B' J N.E. 20TH STREET IGSF im ® m s^u BUILDING OUTPARCEL 46 ov v © !• . © !!�itl ----- MATCH_INE SEE SHEET -7 P — SOD k FpOL iER illi " BRADSHAW GUL &Ae6DCIATIe rrsow I]T ]v�eleTliw Retll�3A]0I` m...ess4mmsA D.ae,mwana FAxss4m,ln \ \\ \ 3A000ST��t 9 JULY2 01 CRY OF MIAMI VH.. \ \ M 5 OFFICE OF NEARING BOARDS AANS REVIEIY _ cCr[ \\ „ co . tied Ift the pub,;c record 17 corsRec;c uF'^ items �Z -; �N P-1 Waiter " .... n � 'z _ — ' SCALE: I" = 20'_C" 0 _9 0 .CO -T— G.— BUILDING 'A' DECO23 RATIVE GRATES "13 - RR 3 No 9 O 4 + co cr: 0 A ".I'A'L.IRT 2 I.o CITY OF MIAMI IE OF HIM -0 BOARDS PLANS RE— Submitted into the public record in connecv.-F,, P� item. onzs of Wafter BRORM M &ASSOCIATES " SOD o C, GIA LO—NG PARKING STRUCTURE GARAGE —ss .CO -T— G.— BUILDING 'A' DECO23 RATIVE GRATES "13 - RR 3 No 9 O 4 + co cr: 0 A ".I'A'L.IRT 2 I.o CITY OF MIAMI IE OF HIM -0 BOARDS PLANS RE— Submitted into the public record in connecv.-F,, P� item. onzs of Wafter BRORM M &ASSOCIATES 0 1 • [I Is D NOr CJT LEADER TUM BRA LHES BT 25 TO RETAM NATIRAL S -FE CF TT . NO -- SHaLL EE —S PRIOR TO MSTALL— PAMT ALL C(R5 OVER W. DIAMETER W1 APPROVED TSE PANT AT CROTC CVER let MN T 5RANC4 UT TO '=1. cxJi 21F�5. 3- HIW WATERING SAILER lRE1 - r R£P�aCE W' SCD dFiEN £STABLISQS: LEIGTN LEO STACF SIIITI.BLE SIZE r TL $TAB(L)E^ TREE. FM15H [RADE !EI'10YE ELL2AP FRIXi TOP 6 BALL PLAMIh4'- 501E O—LL FERTILIZER AS SPECFIED CO.'1PACT SOIL TO FR'EVENT SETREMENT TYPICAL TREE PLANTING DETAIL - t9aBN. r WdSNMGTW F4LM8J REPAVE OF LdIER FTuW'. TIE REMANNG�5 TO fROTECi PID - fSABAL PALMS) DEAD'B�TS' MAT RTIAM 1-3' BFLQU LIVE FRONDS C CPtiJN5M4R CN csP'ff SFKIES IS EAH 1'aTON PALMS) BEa®' rc REMAM uME� PosSeLE. (FLAP TR WITH BJlAP DOlBLE B40 3 — - 2'%A WCOC BATTENS TO WRAPPED TR 2'%d'%B 'd[JOJ STABS - 3 MM PER RE_ LATER R I'W1LCH AS SPECIFIED '' HKSR W4TERMG $AU, cR IREI'ICYc ' FEP24CE W) SOD uHM EST49LISNEC. 3'%4' bLbD 9TAKE5 FMISH GRADE SAND SACK ILL —LIM. AS SPECIFIED TYPICAL PALM PLANTING DETAIL PIAM1-i LIST -815CAi ERENTALS -P-((PERMIT) 011 —C—C—N HEIGHT SP ppAK.v-..' [S&P—S _ fRADSl][]8. CE .B -Ca Oyl-bmti1— I> -IJ' 1012' 6 R Fl I euroPY--CUL — •.1888CIdi88 C> >. my -Gwen Malar' _>o. xood Full.Jmu�wn _ Q," CTLcrcus+•�rlginunumUnn, p,lm Ifi-IB' In l_ 62 fiJl.comsum erowo Af3.A RH _ 10.12 8R. rod Mach:d n.a. hC. SP• u [ahal Palmrno &Ifi- Full lkads l-, —I-- ae8erdh:.3r vps Isls6lsgbnL s>I I. 1. Ih I�. I_ o toll P 8�9uTlbQlN Wi sasti nO g.ln M1C emuvsca ee�rd PAl[951-]2NIT R[ —_ -Full --- tlta .: E�SM1.>IIvntendn A p - _o + o`J a� RCJ�!ipt ..�Plv bax 21 cu`r .ITS cr v .f{.ilPc _0-J fu,lsiv _i.. un ,_I Piw,"a�,�,d��xu„nm J J Pwl 51H _ n_a Fw1._ et ncTPr�vla IPJ I_ u,6 101.=o.s -- . RMIT) '3.01 _ Z KEIV Q OT EF 7,RFV.O TRL REMARKS r_1 IS CI M1 br I lJ IG -l+' fwlramP 1_W^/� Cv' . Coax mmcBn Cmmcn Malar- -r ulxrod Full en []] Grttn M.rinrm l.winm pale nn, 1� c r Qv- 19 Que:eus s:r8in:anu 1618 t?I_67- Fwl.J�ovviT¢gTo�n F Lire Oak z C'alM1hag: pa sugenvdh:�BnTTr .SN nia mwium�ni 1J15 .0 I. 6 Fwl rannpJ p r d hWl f 0 d J h - a r •p Fc:ifc+Loosoipiai::vm - - midpoin::He'eh f J P f AFP -rfU.l pa un_vs n- i Fwl."o.c TM1. f a a.11 a _ 1a11 fared aml- m. P n "d iabl�shmrn:. 1,1, -Hed�a shell hplan:etl®d vanvixd sn ar nim.naram�rna �mFmlm, whd_ rc�adian lV_.iM1 -. SfN B rO]a Full.'!" I un qus' -FIh,oc. C” - 8JLMml Theplarfng fmap wn of,0'. nuc4. SF.4 J :U:.t cu sMxn on Pay_ OFFICFA Q.T.T. - mo I P.NB{ dy} r• 11.1kh dl,--,-.1,—,.lrmrt Crnn'6saM plain l's iM1allbe <om d�rtd ascamxl nn M1e d.a'w;nN. S% Led ft1to th&`PUIJ�" mei n_p aAP '«nrcr Plen::n. --- ��„�" • reword i rnecto°•?s iter on WagerFSE k1 7P-3