Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutR-01-0199J-01-87 3/1/01 RESOLUTION NO. 0 .1 — 15 9 A RESOLUTION OF THE MIAMI CITY COMMISSION, WITH ATTACHMENTS, APPROVING WITH CONDITIONS, A MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT PURSUANT TO ARTICLES 13 AND 17 OF ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 11000, FOR THE MIRAMAR CENTER - PHASE II AND III PROJECT, A PHASED PROJECT TO BE LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY 1700 NORTH BAYSHORE DRIVE, MIAMI, FLORIDA, TO BE COMPRISED OF NOT MORE THAN 635 RESIDENTIAL UNITS, ACCESSORY RECREATIONAL SPACE, 110,372 SQUARE FEET OF OTHER NONRESIDENTIAL USE AND 763 PARKING SPACES; DIRECTING TRANSMITTAL OF THE HEREIN RESOLUTION; MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATING CONCLUSIONS OF LAW; PROVIDING FOR BINDING EFFECT; CONTAINING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, on November 7, 2000, the applicant, Vicky Garcia Toledo, Esq., on behalf of Tibor Hollo for Florida East Coast Realty and Louis Baron for Syncron Parking Systems, Inc., (hereinafter referred to as "APPLICANT"), submitted a complete Application for Major Use Special Permit for the Miramar Center - Phase II and III Project (hereinafter referred to as "PROJECT") pursuant to Articles 13 and 17 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, for the property located at approximately 1700 North CITY COMNBSSION MEETING OF FEB ? 2 `711 Resolution No. Bayshore Drive, Miami, Florida, as legally described on "Exhibit B", attached hereto and in "Exhibit A", the Development Order attached hereto; and WHEREAS, development of the PROJECT requires the issuance of a Major Use Special Permit pursuant to Article 17 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended; and WHEREAS, the Large Scale Development Committee met on September 19, 2000 to consider the proposed PROJECT and offer its input; and WHEREAS, the APPLICANT has modified the proposed PROJECT to address the expressed technical concerns raised at said Large Scale Development Committee meeting; and WHEREAS, the Urban Development Review Board met on November 15, 2000 to consider the proposed PROJECT and recommended approval, with conditions as specified in the attached Development Order, of the PROJECT; and WHEREAS, the Miami Planning Advisory Board, at its meeting held on January 17, 2000, Item No. 6, following an advertised public hearing, adopted Resolution No. PAB 06-01 by a vote of five to zero (5-0), RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of the Major Use Special Permit Development Order as attached hereto; and WHEREAS, the City Commission deems it advisable and in the best interest of the general welfare of the City of Miami to Page 2 of 8 I issue a Major Use Special Permit Development Order as hereinafter set forth; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. The recitals and findings contained in the Preamble to this Resolution are hereby adopted by reference thereto and incorporated herein as if fully set forth in this Section. Section 2. A Major Use Special Permit Development Order, attached hereto as "Exhibit A" and made a part hereof, is hereby approved subject to the conditions specified in said Development Order, per Article 17 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, for the Miramar Center - Phase II and III Project (hereinafter referred to as the "PROJECT") to be developed by Tibor Hollo for Florida East Coast Realty and Louis Baron for Syncron Parking Systems, Inc., ("APPLICANT"), at approximately 1700 North Bayshore Drive, Miami, Florida, more particularly described on "Exhibit B", attached hereto and made a part hereof. Section 3. The PROJECT is hereby approved as Phases II and III of a phased development for the construction of up to 635 residential units, with accessory recreational space, 110,372 square feet of other nonresidential uses and 763 parking spaces. Page 3 of 8 � 1_ Y 5 9 Section 4. The Major Use Special Permit Application for the PROJECT also encompasses the lower ranking Special Permits as set forth in the Development Order, attached as "Exhibit A" hereto and incorporated herein and the requested Modification of Covenant. Section 5. The findings of fact set forth below are hereby made with respect to the subject PROJECT: a. The PROJECT is in conformity with the adopted Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000, as amended. b. The PROJECT is in accord with the SD -6 Zoning classifications of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended. C. Pursuant to Section 1305 of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, the specific site plan aspects of the PROJECT, i.e., ingress and egress, parking, signs and lighting, utilities, drainage, preservation of natural features and control of potentially adverse effects generally, have been considered and will be further considered administratively during the process of issuing a building permit and a certificate of occupancy. Page 4 of 8 01— 150 d. Phase I of the PROJECT is expected to cost approximately $200 million, and to employ approximately 330 workers during construction (FTE); the PROJECT will also result in the creation of approximately 65 permanent new jobs. The PROJECT will generate approximately $3.3 million annually in tax revenues to local units of government (2000 dollars). e. The City Commission further finds that: (1) the PROJECT will have a favorable impact on the economy of the City; (2) the PROJECT will efficiently use public transportation facilities; (3) any potentially adverse effects of the PROJECT will be mitigated through compliance with the conditions of this Major Use Special Permit; (4) the PROJECT will favorably affect the need for people to find adequate housing reasonably accessible to their places of employment; (5) the PROJECT will efficiently use necessary public facilities; Page 5 of 8 (6) the PROJECT will not negatively impact the environment and natural resources of the City; (7) the PROJECT will not adversely affect living conditions in the neighborhood; (8) the PROJECT will not adversely affect public safety; (9) based on the record presented and evidence presented, the public welfare will be served by the PROJECT; and (10) any potentially adverse effects of the PROJECT arising from safety and security, fire protection and life safety, solid waste, heritage conservation, trees, shoreline development, minority participation and employment, and minority contractor/subcontractor participation will be mitigated through compliance with the conditions of this Major Use Special Permit. Section 6. The Major Use Special Permit, as approved and amended, shall be binding upon the APPLICANT and any successors in interest. Section 7. The application for Major Use Special Permit, which was submitted on November 7, 2000, and on file Page 6 of 8 — 195 with the Department of Planning and Zoning of the City Of Miami, Florida, shall be relied upon generally for administrative interpretations and is made a part hereof by reference. Section 8. The City Manager is hereby directed to instruct the Director of the Department of Planning and Zoning to transmit a copy of this Resolution and attachment to the developers: Vicky Garcia -Toledo, Esq. on behalf of Tibor Hollo and Louis Baron, 2500 First Union Financial Center, 200 South Biscayne Boulevard, Miami, Fl. 33131. Section 9. The Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law are made with respect to the PROJECT as described in the Development Order for the Miramar Center - Phase II and III Project, which is attached hereto as "Exhibit A" and made a part hereof by reference. Section 10. The Major Use Special Permit Development Order for the Miramar Center - Phase II and III Project ("Exhibit A") is hereby granted and issued. Section 11. In the event that any portion or section of this Resolution or the Development Order ("Exhibit A") is determined to be invalid, illegal, or unconstitutional by a court or agency of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall in no manner affect the remaining portions of this Resolution or Development Order ("Exhibit A") which shall remain in full force and effect. Page 7 of 8 Section 12. The provisions approved for this Major Use Special Permit, as approved, shall commence and become operative thirty (30) days after the adoption of the herein Resolution. Section 13. This Major Use Special Permit. as annroved. shall expire two (2) years from its commencement and operative date. Section 14. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its adoption and signature of the Mayor.'/ PASSED AND ADOPTED this 22nd day of February 2001. JOE CAROLLO, MAYOR in accordance with Miami Code Sic. 2-06, singe the Mayor did not inrf", tri of this tegistation by signirm in becomes off active with the C' (10) d, ys Jni ln, ;rci regarding same, without �r��4( ATTEST: WALTER J. FOEMAN CITY CLERK -... APPROVJIIT AS/flO FO 29 AND CORRECTNESS: IF ATTO EY 3 . dp r] Clerk 1� If the Mayor does not sign this Resolution, it shall become effective at the end of ten calendar days from the date it was passed and adopted. If the Mayor vetoes this Resolution, it shall become effective immediately upon override of the veto by the City Commission. Page 8 of 8 � - 159 "EXHIBIT A" ATTACHMENT TO RESOLUTION NO. 00 ---- DATE: ---, 2001 Miramar Center - PHASES II and III PROJECT MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT DEVELOPMENT ORDER Let it be known that pursuant to Articles 13 and 17 of Ordinance No. 11000, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended, the Commission of the City of Miami, Florida, has considered in a public hearing, the issuance of a Major Use Special Permit for the Miramar Center - Phase II and III Project (hereinafter referred to as the "PROJECT") to be located at approximately 1700 North Bayshore Drive, Miami, Florida; see legal description on "Exhibit B", attached hereto and made a part hereof; said legal description is subject to any dedications, limitations, restrictions, reservations or easements of record. After due consideration of the recommendations of the Planning Advisory Board and after due consideration of the consistency of this proposed development with the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan, the City Commission has approved the PROJECT, and subject to the following conditions approves the Major Use Special Permit and hereby issues this Permit: Page 1 of 11 �. FINDINGS OF FACT PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The proposed Miramar Center - Phases II and I I I Project is a residential/mixed use development to be located at approximately 1700 North Bayshore Drive, Miami, Florida; ("PROJECT"). The PROJECT is located on a gross lot area of approximately 121,472 square feet and a net lot area of approximately 70,330 square feet of land (more specifically described on "Exhibit B", incorporated herein by reference). The remainder of the Project's VITAL DATA is attached hereto as "EXHIBIT C", and incorporated herein by reference. The proposed PROJECT will consist of no more than 635 residential units with accessory recreational space, 110,372 square feet of other nonresidential uses and a total of 763 parking spaces. The ownership, operation and maintenance of common areas and facilities will be by the property owner or (in the case of the property being converted to condominiums) a mandatory property owner association in perpetuity pursuant to a recorded Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions. The Major Use Special Permit Application for the Project also encompasses the following lower ranking Special Permits: Page 2 of 11 CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 906.6 for active recreational facilities (including a swimming pool); CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Section 915.2 for FAA clearance letter; CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT to permit staging and parking during construction (to be approved prior to obtaining a building permit from Planning); CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT for Development Signs when combined with construction/rental signs; CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 917.2.1 to allow valet parking for residential and other uses; CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as for a temporary construction trailer; CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 6, Section 606 for development of new construction within the SD -6 District; CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT for a temporary construction fence and covered walkway; CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT for reduction of loading berths; CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 15 for waiver of certain off street parking Guides and Standards; CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT for backup into a public alley; Certificate of Appropriateness for ground disturbing activity in an archeological conservation area (City Code Section 23-5a); City Commission approval for the following: 1. Waiver of Noise Ordinance during the required concrete pours for construction of the building (City Code Chapter 36) . Page 3 of 11 2. Modification of a Declaration of Restrictions dated 20th day of September 1995 and amended on 10th day of August 1998, previously approved by City Commission. Said modification maintaining the previously approved density and relocating the 678 units from Phase II and III to be combined in Phase II. Phase III is to remain with 100,000 sq. ft. for uses listed in Declaration of Restrictive Covenants as amended. Pursuant to Articles 13 and 17 of Zoning Ordinance 11000, approval of the requested Major Use Special Permit shall be considered sufficient for the subordinate permits requested and referenced above as well as any other special approvals required by the City which may be required to carry out the requested plans. The PROJECT shall be constructed substantially in accordance with plans and design schematics on file prepared by The Corradino Group, dated October, 2000; the landscape plan shall be implemented substantially in accordance with plans and design schematics on file prepared by Urban Resource Group, dated October, 2000; said design and landscape plans may be permitted to be modified only to the extent necessary to comply with the conditions for approval imposed herein; all modifications shall be subject to the review and approval of the Page 4 of 11 01— i5J Director of the Department of Planning and Zoning prior to the issuance of any building permits. The PROJECT conforms to the requirements of the SD -6 Zoning District, as contained in Ordinance No. 11000, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended. The existing comprehensive plan future land use designation on the subject property allows the proposed mix of residential and commercial uses. CONDITIONS THE APPLICANT, ITS SUCCESSORS, AND/OR ASSIGNS, JOINTLY OR SEVERALLY, PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF ANY BUILDING PERMITS, SHALL COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING: 1. Meet all applicable building codes, land development regulations, ordinances and other laws. 2. Pay all applicable fees due prior to the issuance of a building permit; and, pay DRI fees required to reserve development credits within 60 days of the effective date of this Resolution. 3. Allow the Miami Police Department to conduct a security survey, at the option of the Department, and to make recommendations concerning security measures and systems; further submit a report to the Department of Planning and Zoning, prior to commencement of construction, Page 5 of 11 demonstrating how the Police Department recommendations, if any, have been incorporated into the PROJECT security and construction plans, or demonstrate to the Planning Director why such recommendations are impractical. 4. Obtain approval from, or provide a letter from the Department of Fire -Rescue indicating APPLICANT'S coordination with members of the Fire Plan Review Section at the Department of Fire -Rescue in the review of the scope of the PROJECT, owner responsibility, building development process and review procedures, as well as specific requirements for fire protection and life safety systems, exiting, vehicular access and water supply. 5. Obtain approval from, or provide a letter of assurance from the Department of Solid Waste that the PROJECT has addressed all concerns of the said Department prior to the obtainment of a shell permit. 6. Prepare a Minority Participation and Employment Plan (including a Contractor/Subcontractor Participation Plan) to be submitted to the City's Director of Equal Employment Opportunity for review and comments, with the understanding that the APPLICANT must use its best efforts to follow the provisions of the City's Minority/Women Business Affairs and Procurement Program as a guide. 7. Record the following in the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, prior to the issuance of a shell permit: (a) a Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions providing that the ownership, operation and maintenance of all common areas and facilities will be by the property owner or a Page 6 of 11 mandatory property owner association in perpetuity; (b) a certified copy of the development order specifying that the Development Order runs with the land and is binding on the APPLICANT, its successors, and assigns, jointly or severally. 8. Prior to the issuance of a shell permit, demonstrate to the City that the PROJECT has either: (a) completed its condominium requirements and has been approved for such by the State of Florida; or (b) provide the City with an executed, recordable unity of title or covenant in -lieu of unity of title agreement for the subject property; said agreement shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Attorney's Office. 9. Provide the Department of Public Works with plans for proposed sidewalk and swale area improvements (including implementation of the Burle Marx plan for Biscayne Boulevard) for its review and approval prior to the issuance of a building permit. 10. Provide the Department of Planning and Zoning with a temporary parking plan, including an operational plan, which addresses construction employee parking during the construction period; said plan shall be subject to the review and approval by the Department of Planning and Zoning prior to the issuance of any building permits and shall be enforced during construction activity. 11. Pursuant to the Departments of Fire -Rescue and General Services Administration, the roof area of the proposed structures shall be made available to the City of Miami for Page 7 of 11 U1- 199 any necessary communications equipment at no charge to the City. 12. The applicant shall keep the Dade County archeologist apprised of all ground disturbing activity; based upon his findings, some level of monitoring by a private archeological consultant may be required. 13. Pursuant to staff design review, the APPLICANT shall submit final revised design details, including materials, color schemes, and final landscape and lighting plan, to the Director of the Panning and Zoning Department for review and approval, prior to the issuance of a building permit. 14. Prior to the issuance of a shell permit, the APPLICANT shall submit an interim plan, including a landscape plan, which addresses design details for the land occupying Phase III of this project in the event that the future phase is not developed; said plan shall include a proposed timetable and shall be subject to review and approval by the Director of the Planning and Zoning Department. 15. Prior to the issuance of any building permits for Phase III of this project, the applicant shall conduct updated traffic studies that shall include recommendations for mitigation. Page 8 of 11 _ 199 16. Prior to the issuance of a Building Permit for Phase II and for Phase III, as applicable, APPLICANT shall submit plans for a decorative construction fence, which shall serve to block the view of the construction site from the public, to the City of Miami Planning and Zoning Department for its review and approval. THE CITY SHALL: Establish the operative date of this Permit as being thirty (30) days from the date of its issuance; the issuance date shall constitute the commencement of the thirty (30) day period to appeal from the provisions of the Permit. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW The Miramar Center Project, proposed by the applicant, Tibor Hollo for Florida East Coast Realty and Louis Baron for Syncron Parking systems, Inc., ("APPLICANT"), complies with the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000, is consistent with the orderly development and goals of the City of Miami, and complies with local land development regulations and further, pursuant to Section 1703 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000: (1) the PROJECT will have a favorable impact on the economy of the City; and Page 9 of 11 ., 9 (2) the PROJECT will efficiently use public transportation facilities; and (3 ) the PROJECT will favorably affect the need for people to find adequate housing reasonably accessible to their places of employment; and (4) the PROJECT will efficiently use necessary public facilities; and (5) the PROJECT will not negatively impact the environment and natural resources of the City; and (6) the PROJECT will not adversely affect public safety; and (7) the public welfare will be served by the PROJECT; and (8) any potentially adverse effects of the PROJECT will be mitigated through conditions of this Major Use Special Permit. The proposed development does not unreasonably interfere with the achievement of the objectives of the adopted State Land Development Plan applicable to the City of Miami. Pursuant to Section 1305 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, the specific site plan aspects of the PROJECT i.e., ingress and egress, offstreet parking and loading, refuse and service areas, signs and lighting, utilities, drainage and control of Page 10 of 11 potentially adverse effects generally have been considered and will be further considered administratively during the process of issuing individual building permits and certificates of occupancy. W5034ExhA Page 11 of 11 .J .E .. PZ -2 PLANNING FACT SHEET APPLICANT Vicky Garcia -Toledo, Esq. for Florida East Coast Realty, Inc., Contract Purchaser and Tibor Hollo and Synchro Parking Systems, Inc., owners. HEARING DATE January 17, 2001. REQUESTILOCATION Consideration of a Major Use Special Permit for the Miramar Center Project located at approximately 1700 North Bayshore Drive. LEGAL DESCRIPTION Complete legal description on file with the Hearing Boards Office. PETITION Consideration of approving a Major Use Special Permit for the Miramar Center Project located at approximately 1700 North Bayshore Drive in order to allow two structures with a total of 635 residential units, 110,372 square feet of nonresidential uses and 763 parking spaces. PLANNING Approval with conditions. RECOMMENDATION BACKGROUND AND Please see attached analysis. ANALYSIS PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD Approval with conditions VOTE: 5-0 CITY COMMISSION N/A APPLICATION NUMBER 2000-074 Item #6 CITY OF MIAMI - PLANNING DEPARTMENT 444 SW 21D AVENUE, 3RD FLOOR • MIAMI, FLORIDA, 33130 PHONE (305) 416-1400 Date: 01/16/2001 - Page ^ g Analysis for major Use Special Permit for the CENTER— PHASES H AND III PROJECT located at 1700 NORTH BAYSHORE DRIVE CASE NO. 2000-074 Pursuant to Ordinance 11000, as amended, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, the subject proposal for the Miramar Center Project has been reviewed to allow a Major Use Special Permit. This Permit also includes the following requests: CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 906.6 for active recreational facilities (including a swimming pool); CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Section 915.2 for FAA clearance letter; CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT to permit staging and parking during construction (to be approved prior to obtaining a building permit from Planning); CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT for Development Signs when combined with construction/rental signs; CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 917.2.1 to allow valet parking for residential and other uses; CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as for a temporary construction trailer; CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 6, Section 606 for development of new construction within the SD -6 District; CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT for a temporary construction fence and covered walkway; CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT for reduction of loading berths; CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 15 for waiver of certain off street parking Guides and Standards; CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT for backup into a public alley; 01— .199 Cc, iiilcitto of appropriateness for ground disturbing activity in an archeological conservation area (city Code Section 23-5a); City Commission approval for the following: 1. Waiver of Noise Ordinance during the required concrete pours for construction of the building (City Code Chapter 36). 2. Modification of a declaration of Restrictions dated 20'b day of September, 1995 and amended on I& day of August, 1998, previously approved by City Commission. Said modification maintaining the previously approved density and relocating the 678 units from Phase II and III to be combined in Phase II. Phase III is to remain with 100,000 sq. ft. for uses listed in Declaration of Restrictive Covenants as amended. Pursuant to Articles 13 and 17 of Zoning Ordinance 11000, approval of the requested Major Use Special Permit shall be considered sufficient for the subordinate permits requested and referenced above as well as any other special approvals required by the City which may be required to carry out the requested plans. The requested Special Permit is for the purpose of allowing -a mixed-use development project consisting of 110,372 sq. ft. of nonresidential uses, and a total of 635 residential units, with 763 parking spaces, for the property located at approximately 1700 North Bayshore Drive (see attached legal description, location maps and aerial photographs for exact property boundaries). In determining the appropriateness of the proposed residential project, the Planning and Zoning Department has referred this project to the Large Scale Development Committee (LSDC), the City of Miami Preservation Officer, and the Urban Development Review Board (DDRB) for additional input and recommendations; the following findings have been made: • It is found that the proposed residential/mixed-use development project, with accessory retail, will benefit the Downtown District by creating new housing opportunities in the Omni area to serve Downtown. • It is found that the subject property has convenient access to public transit that makes it ideally suited for residential and office as a mixed use to serve the downtown area. 01- 199 • It is found that per the Fire and GSA Departments of the City, the roof of the proposed structure may be required for communications equipment to serve the City; this are should be made available for said use at no charge to the City. • It is found that the City of Miami Preservation Officer reviewed the project and that a recommendation was made regarding archeological monitoring in the manner set forth in the condition described below. • It is found that the project was reviewed by the Large Scale Development Committee on September 19, 2000 and has been modified to address the expressed technical concerns raised at said Large Scale Development Committee meeting;. however, additional design details related to sidewalk and swale area improvements will have to be submitted at the time of permitting. • It is found that the UDRB has recommended approval of the proposed project, pursuant to a public meeting held on November 15, 2000. • It is found that upon referral of the proposed project to Public Works and the Downtown NET Office, the following comments were received: 1. Pursuant to the Department of Public Works, the project requires plans for proposed sidewalk and swale area improvements prior to the issuance of a building permit; and 2. Pursuant to the Downtown NET Office, the applicant shall submit a parking plan for construction employees, including an operational plan for construction activity and enforcement; said parking plan shall be subject to the review and approval by the Department of Planning and Zoning prior to the issuance of any building permits. • It is found that, as a phased development project, it is difficult, if not impossible, for the developer to anticipate levels of actual future development and associated traffic impacts associated with such development. In order to adequately ensure that adverse impacts to the area will not occur, the Planning and Zoning Department would recommend that a condition be added to this development order which requires the applicant to conduct updated traffic studies prior to obtaining building permits for each subsequent phase of this project. The subject traffic studies should include recommendations for mitigation, including signalization options for the area. • It is found that with respect to all additional criteria as specified in Section 1305 of Zoning Ordinance 11000, the proposal has been reviewed and found to be adequate. Based on these findings, the Department of Planning and Zoning is recommending approval of the requested Development Project with the following conditions: 01- 199 1. The approval of this Major Use Special Permit shall be subject to the recordation of the following documents prior to the issuance of shell permits for the proposed project: a. Unity of Title or covenant in lieu thereof providing that the ownership, operation and maintenance of all common areas and facilities will be by the property owner or a mandatory property owner association in perpetuity or completion of the State of Florida condominium process which assures the same compliance. b. Development Order specifying that the Development Order runs with the land and is binding on the Applicant, it successors and assigns, jointly or severally. 2. Pursuant to the Fire and GSA Departments, the roof area of the proposed structure shall be made available to the City of Miami for any necessary communications equipment at no charge to the City. 3. The applicant shall submit a parking plan for construction employees, including an operational plan for construction activity and enforcement; said parking plan shall be subject to the review and approval by the Department of Planning and Zoning prior to the issuance of any building permits. 4. The applicant shall keep the Dade County archeologist apprised of all ground disturbing activity; based upon his findings, some level of monitoring by a private archeological consultant may be required. 5. Pursuant to staff review, the APPLICANT shall submit final design details, including materials, color schemes, and final landscape and lighting plan, to the Director of the Panning and Zoning Department for review and approval, prior to the issuance of a building permit. 6. Prior to the issuance of a shell permit, the APPLICANT shall submit an interim plan, including a landscape plan, which addresses design details for the land occupying Phase III of this project in the event that the future phase is not developed; said plan shall include a proposed timetable and shall be subject to review and approval by the Director of the Planning and Zoning Department. 7. The applicant shall conduct updated traffic studies prior to obtaining building permits for each future phase of this project. The subject traffic studies should include recommendations for mitigation, including signalization options for the area. 011.- 191 8. This approval shall also be subject to all additional conditions as specified in the attached Development Order. 01- 199 RESOLUTION PAB -06-01 A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT, WITH CONDITIONS AS SPECIFIED BY STAFF, FOR THE MIRAMAR CENTER PROJECT LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY 1700 NORTH BAYSHORE DRIVE, IN ORDER TO ALLOW TWO STRUCTURES WITH A TOTAL OF 635 RESIDENTIAL UNITS, 110,372 SQUARE FEET OF NONRESIDENTIAL USES AND 763 PARKING SPACES. HEARING DATE: January 17, 2001 ITEM NO. 6 VOTE: 5-0 ATTEST:,•,T =T Ana Gelabert-Sanchez;'Directbr Planning and Zoning Department 01- 199 n ' r ' t,( '• i - � - ` p'rr i it 7 T 2 • � ` if • I 'Z . T a• on •>. .r r • 1 1 • n ' � I ME 22' ST f f • i IW; E N TRgC e u ro • T• s• •a . I , 2 G � w•Yoa� �' 1 � : i n ,[ li w ro • • e J S• •� • » r r •• !1! 2I 5'f. I N.E cr 21 iii oft a.���...� r. •Iao I NE F • 2C V7.1 r I - ro 11-111,41, s,a y i o s). •1 M rN �`�1 5 .t I. i• :i, a Te• � � , `{ .t ,'L ,,c ♦ i t It V % ,t I " 7o w.l. )• ��l ' =o 11 II ... r•r R• 7 • w4 v .w & z.lx ro _uv[►rcRv ,• , r2 . t j .e2 a• I , z f I fffff SC"�O, • J I ,a 3 2 I • ) S �'� 9 s • I N.E. —191. r ST j p, TEMPLE ISRAEL i �•.�o - 6 /I PARK Il,lb ' -,•Ir, a -(�•^' �PP� ~ u n; ' ,. - ,> ,• .,,;• N't _ SII TY CEMETERY I N. i° ST N �• ^ is ' a 3 I ' • � y r 2) 7 ` Q a • • co a Ul t • (i t�j • `0 • QTR W • 9Les 2 t 0 1=i 17 ..our[ f••' Q �I Z D .•.c 'A'1 " ^ TRACT "A" L ,. 1p vitro[• 11 I y Fa a �» CO -1 " OMNI ANNEX E��rol7 �Q T. '7 17 S - � ° I� I s Q'•• s > F h.E 01 • ` 8 • a Q 9 • C! 17 . N a> ae a. TRACT '� �(�• O i }w SJ1TtR aO1rn ' . :a r7 ra I zrR,zB• tOr w Y T .y - _ - i" 15 St.�. TRACT �-•7 s ' : y A PLAZA PHASE E -- 4cy N E t T ..C. E Ir fPACT'A' \L p t. .15 ST.` v Ot vaw[TIAN 4vs[v. JD006*00000000000 W N. E. IS ' c ° S 1 1 I TRAC T tT • :•I T I� � W CEN ER W rJ l2 ,e .•! 2 • y f • Z 2 ., a.. / )a•,» nn HERALD PARK I O° wtt� •RC► -"Cat ••Y4 S T. °Od0000Jo000 aan TR `A` O s = ► I' N. E. ooe0000144 ST i ,'Z' C-2 $ i r 00000e000 a 10 = ° - :. .a. + �• < s. . e • — z o 3 av• ' �" . N s. s: o' I 'N. E. IS AR 3 , �v O qlr co`wTi • •notes+ a v o N.E i ST. ,» N.E.Mac ARTHUF • . ;LMIPA ;. . w. PavPas sue :.•. ��» l I �.- _ - — j CAUSEWAY a . a� V CITY OF MIAMI PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPLICATION FOR MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT IT IS IN I`ENDED THAT MAJOR USE SYSCIAL.PERMITS BE REQUIRED WKM SPECIFIED USES AND/OR OCCUPANCIES INVOLVE MATTERS DEEMED TO BE OF CITYWIDE OR AREA -WIDE IMPORTANCE. THE CITY COMMISSION SHALL BE SOLELY RBSPONSIBLL FOR DETBRMINATIONS ON APPLICATIONS FOR MAJOR USE SPECIALPERMITS. (SBE .4ATICLB/7OFORDINAMCC 11000,ASAhlENDF.D.THE ZOIVINGW NANCC OF THE CrrrOFMMA#,, rMORIDA.) THE CITY COMMISSION SHALL REFER ALL APPLICATIONS FOR MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT$ TO THE PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD AND TO TRE DIRECTOR OF TIM PLANNINO DEPARTMENT FOR RECOMMENDATIONS, AND MAY MAKE REFERRALS TO AGENCIES, BODIES, OR OFPICSM, Btl MTHROUGIT THE PLAHMO DWARTbGM OR DIRECTLY, FORREVIEW, ANALYSIS ANNORTUMNICALFINDINGSAND DETPRMINA710MANDREPORTSTIMEON. (SEESEC"ON 1301.5 OA ORDINANCE 11000, AS AkVWED, M ZONINO ORDINANCE OF THE CUT OFJ1 LW- FLORIDA.) SECTION 2.633 OPTHLCODSOFTHEC rrY OFMIAMT,FLORIDA, AS AMENDED, GAqERALLYREQUIIt&S ANYP.&RSON WTIO RECEIVES COWENSATION, REMUNERATION OR WENSBS FOR CONDUCTiNO LOBBYING ACT== TO ROGISTBR AS A LOBBYIST WITH THE Cf TY CLERK, PRIOR TO UNGAGWO IN LODDYING ACMMISS BEFORE CITY STAFF, BOARDS, COMMITTEES AND THB CITY COMMISSION. A COPY OF SAID ORDINANCE 1S AVAILABLE IN THE OFFICB OF THE CITY CLERK (MIAMI CITY HALL), LOCATI;I? AT 3300 PAN AMERICAN DANE, MIAMI. FLORIDA 33133. NOTE: THISAPPLICATWN MUST BE T"E"ITT.ENAND SIGNED,TNBLACXINX %Tibor HoIlo. as an individual and as President of Florida East Coast Really and Lavas Baron as President of Syn_cron Parking Systems. Inc.. hereby apply to the Director of the Planning Department of the City of Miami for approval of a Major Use Special Permit under the provisions of Article 17 of the City of Miami Zoning Ordinance. Property Address: Approximately 1700 North Ray Shore Drive Nature of proposed use (be specific): Phase IT residential high-rise With ground floor eo=errial Phase Tit institutional/commercial use as per Declaration of 13;ltrictivc C'ovenanl, as amended, APPLICATION MATIERIAI.S I attach the following in support and explanation of the application: 1. Two original surveys, prepared by a State of Florida Registered Land Surveyor within ane year from the date of application. 2. Affidavit disclosing ownership of property covered by application and disclosure of interest form (attach forms 4-83 and 4a-83 to application). 3. Ccrtifted list of owners of real estate Within a 375 -foot radius from the outside boundaries of property, (attach form 6-83 to application). 4. Maps of the: (a) Existing zoning designation. (b) Adopted comprehensive plan designation for areas on and around the prg4PSM. 199 S. General location map showing relation to the site or activity to major streets, schools, existing utilities, shopping areas, important physical features in and adjoining the project, and the like. 6. Concept Plan (a) Site plan and relevant information per Section 1304.2.1d -h. (b) Relationships to surrounding existing and proposed futures uses and activities, systems and facilities, per Section 1702.3.2x. (e) How concept affects existing zoning and adopted comprehensive -!an principles and designations; * tabulation of any required variances, special permits, changes of zoning or exemptions, per Section 1702-3.2b. 7. Developmental Impact Study (an application for development approval for a Development of Regional Impact may substitute). 8. Other (be specific): 9. Fee of S 30, 000 , for the Major Use Special Permit, based on current fee' schedule as set forth in Chapter 62 of the Code of the City of Miami, as amended. 10. Additional fee of S 0 , for any required special permits, changes of zoning or variances set forth in chapter 62 of the Code of the City of Miami, as amended. Total Fee: S 30,000 , Signature Name Tibor Hollo c/o A. Vicky Garcia -Toledo. Esa. Address 200 South Biscayne B1vd..Suite 2500. Miami, FL 33131 Phone/Fax 305-350-2409 / 305-374-7593 Date FINAL APPROVAL OF THIS APPLICATION FOR MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT SHALL CONSIST OF AN EXECUTED RESOLUTION BY THE MIAMI CITY COMMISSION AND A DEVELOPMENT ORDER ATTACHED THERETO'WHICH SPECIFIES THE CONDITIONS UNDER WHICH THIS MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT APPLICATION IS APPROVED; IF APPROVED BYTHE CITY COMMISSION, SAIDRESOLUTIONAND DEVELOPMENT ORDERSHALL, UPON EXECUTION THEREOF BE TRANSMITTED TO THE OWNER OR AUTHORIZED AGENT AT THE ADDRESS SPECIFIED ABOVE. 91_.- 199 APPLICATION MATERIALS (confinu4 I attach the following in support and explanation of the application: 11. General location map showing relation to the site or activity to major streets, schools, existing utilities, shopping areas, important physical features in and adjoining the project, and the like. 12. Concept Plan (a) Site plan and relevant information per Section 1304.2.) d -h. (b) Relationships to surrounding existing and proposed futures uses and activities, systems and facilities, per Section 1702.3.2a. (c) Ilow concept affects existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan principles and designations; tabulation of any required variances, special permits, changes of zoning or. exemptions, per Section 1702-3.2b. 13. Developmental impact Study (an application for development approval for a Development of Regional Impact may substitute). 14. Other (be specific): N/A 15. Fee of $ N/A , for the Major Use Special Permit, based on current fee schedule as set forth in Chapter 62 of the Code of the City of Miami, as amended. 16. Additional fee of S N/A , for any required special permits, changes of zoning or variances set forth in chapter 62 of the Code of the City of Miami, as amended. Total Fee: S N/AT Signature NameLouis Baron e% A. VickyGarcia-Toledo.,Esq. Address 200 South Biscayne Blvd. Suite 2500. Miami. FL 33131 Phone/Fax 305-350-2409 305:324--7593 Date FINAL APPROVAL OF THIS API'LICATION FaR MAJOR USE SP1CIAL PERMIT SMALL CONSTST OF AN EXECUTED RESOLUTION BY THE. MIAMI CITY COMMISSION AND A DEVELOPMENT ORDER ATTACKED TEMMO WIUCH SPECIFIES TAE CONDMO14S UNDER WIUCB THIS MA -WR USE SPECIAL, PERMIT APPLICATION TS APYROVED; IF APPROVED BYTHE CITY COMMISSION, SAID RESOLUTION AND DFVFLOPMBNT ORDER SHAE;' UPON MMCUTION TIMEOF AE TRANSMITTED TO TSE OWNER OR AUTHORTZED AGENT AT THE ADDRESS SPECT MW ABOVE. 01- 199 AFFIDAVIT STATE OF FLORIDA } .} SS COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE } Before me, the undersigned authority, this day personally appeared Louis Baron, as President of Synchron Parking Systems, Inc. who being by me first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and says: 1. That he/she is the owner, or the legal representative of the owner, submitting the accompanying application for a public hearing as required by the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, affecting the real property looted in the City of Miami, as described and listed on the pages attached to this Affidavit arid made . apart thereof 2. That all owners whichhe/she represents, ifany, have given their full and complete permission for him/her to act in his/her behalf for the change or modification of a classification or regulation of zoning as set out in the accompanying petition. 3. That the pages attached hereto and made a part of this affidavit contain the current names, maii'ng addresses, telephone numbers and legal descriptions for the real property of which he/she is the owner or legal representative. 4. The facts as represented in the application and documents submitted in conjunction with this affidavit are true and correct. 174rther Affiant sayeth not. Louis Baron, as as President of Synchron Parking Systems, Inc. STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI -DADS The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of t")& 7/J 1A_ R =_ � 2000, by Louis Baron, as as President of Synchron Parking Systems, Inc., on behalf of the corporation who is personally known to me and who did not take an oath. OFFKL►L NQr/►itlf 5 L ,� KA'rE1LE� CROGAN NoOFFIMM CCOYMML N SIO. CV13063 Name: %� 1Th� Notary Public -State of Florida Commission No.: My Commission Expires: 01— 199 AFFIDAVIT STATE OF FLORIDA } )SS COUNTY OF MIAMI -DADS ) Before me, the undersigned authority, this day personally appeared Tibor Hoilowho being by me first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and says: 1. That he/she is the owner, or the legal representative of the owner, submitting the accompanying application for a public hearing as required by the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, affecting the real property located in the City of Miami, as described and listed on the pages attached to this Affidavit and made a part thereof. 2. That all owners whichhe/sherepresents, ifany, have given their full and complete permission forhim/her to act in his/her behalf for the change or modification of a classification or regulation of zoning as set out in the _ accompanying petition. 3. That the pages attacRcd hereto and made a part of this affidavit contain the current names, mailing addresses, telephone numbers and legal descriptions for the real property of which he/she is the owner or legal representative. 4. The facts as represented in the application and documents submitted in conjunction with this affidavit are true and correct Further Affiant sayeth noL Tibor Hollo, as an individual and as President. of Florida East Coast Realty, Inc. STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI -DADS The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ,— day of STD mgt , 2000, by Tibor Hollo, as an individual and as President of Florida East Coast Realty, Inc, on behalf of the corporation who is personally known to me and who did not take an oath. N No Public -State of Florida s L Commission No.: KATfa.MN cAocnri My Commission Expires: NQTA ky puguC 5TAT6 OF RD"M commwa iN r0- CCMW 01- 199 OWNER'S LIST Phase 11 Owner's Name:Synchron parkin¢ Systems. Inc. Mailing Address: c% Vicky Garcia -Toledo Egg., 200 So Biscayne Blvd Suite 2500 Miami FL 33131 Telephone Number: (305) 350-2409 Legal Description: Phase III Owner's Name: Tibor Hollo Mailing Address: -e% Vicky Garcia -Toledo. Esa.. 200 So. Biscayne Blvd Suite 2500 Miami FL 33131 Telephone Number:1305) 350.2409 Legal Description: Owner's Name: Florida East Coast Realty, Inc as Contract Purchaser Mailing Address: c% Vicky Cuxia Toledo, Esq., 200 So. Biscayne Blvd Suite 2500 Miami FL 33131 Telephone Number. (305) 350.2409 Legal Description: Any other real estate property owned individually, jointly or severally (by corporation, partnership br privately) within 375 feet of the subject site is listed as follows: Street Address Bay Parc Plaza Apartments _ 1756 N. Bayshore Drive Miami, FL 33131 Lega1 Description Lot 1 Block 1. Seaport Subdivision. PB 149, P¢ 79 of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County 01- 199 DISCLOSURE OF OWNERSHIP 1. 1. Legal description and street address of subject real property: Exhibit "A" 2. Owner(s) of subject real Property and percentage of ownership. Note: Section 2-618 of the Code of the City of Miami requires disclosure of all parties having a financial interest, either direct or indirect in the subject matter of a presentation, request or petition to the City Conunission. Accordingly, question 02 requires disclosure of sha;�holders of corporations, beneficiaries of trusts, and/or any other interested parties, together with their addresses and proportionate interest. Phase II Synchron Parking Systems, Inc., Shareholder. Thor Hollo 1000/0 Florida East Coast Realty, as Contract Purchaser Owned by Tibor Hollo 1000/0 Phase III - Tibor Hollo 100% 3., Legal description and street address of any real property (a) owned by any party listed in answer to question #2, and (b) located within 375 feet of the subject real property. Lot 1, Block 1, Seaport Subdivision, Public Book 149, Page 79. 1756 N. Bayshore Drive, Miami, FL 33131 Tibor Hollo, as an individual and as President of Florida East Coast Realty, Inc/Contract Purchaser STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI -DADS The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _/( day of C 2000, by Tibor Hollo, as an individual and as President of Florida East Coast Realty, Inc, on behalf of the corporation who is personally know, to me and who did not take an oath. Name: W�iTHL�ZAu L Notary �ubjic-State of Florida Commission No.: My Commission Expires: MIRAMAR PHASE 11 & 111 ADDENDUM TO APPLICATION FOR MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT November 2000 Note 1. Request for Major Use Special Permits for: a) Development of a 635 residential high rise. b) Development of parking garages with 763 parking spaces. c) Development of a Phase Development project for Phase II and Phase III of the Miramar Project site. Phase 11- 635 residential units Phase 111-100,000 sq. ft. of construction for uses as identified in Section 3 of the Original Declaration of Restrictive Covenants executed on September 20, 1995. Note 2. The above Major Use Special Permits are to encompass the lower ranking special permits requested below: a) To apply for a Class II Special Permit for a waiver of certain requirements of the City of Miami's, off-street parking guides and standards. b) To apply for a Class II Special Permit for new construction under Code Section 601.3.1. c) To apply for a Class II Special Permit for temporary construction fence d) To apply for a Class II Special Permit for reduction of size of loading berths. e) To apply for a Class I permit for permanent recreation facilities f) To apply for a Class I permit to permit the staging and parking during construction. g) To apply for a Class I permit to allow valet parking for residential and other uses. h) To apply for a Class I permit to allow construction trailer. i) To apply for a Class I permit to allow development/construction/rental signage. o! i — I q 9 j) To apply for a Class I permit to allow vehicles to back into the public alley. k) To apply for a Class I Special Permit for a Federal Aviation Authority clearance letter. Note 3. Note 4. To request a waiver from the City Commission as to the items listed below: i) from the noise ordinance during the required concrete pours for construction of the building. ii) modification of a Declaration of Restrictions dated 20th day of September, 1995 and amended on the 10"' day of August, 1998 previously approved by the City Commission. Said modification maintaining the previously approved density and relocating the 678 units from Phase II and III to be combined in Phase II. Phase III is to remain with 100,000 sq. ft. for uses as listed in Declaration of Restrictive Covenants as Amended. To apply for all lesser permits as may be required to allow development and construction of this project as contemplated under this Major Use - Special Permit Application as submitted and per plans on file subject to and including any changes or modifications as may be required as part of the Major Use Special Permit process. 01- 199 ' WE 63 n FLORIDA ENS F (.:t )AS I REALTY, EN Zoning Map Miramar Centre Phase II & III Mimi, Florida 6 U.S. Q 1- 19 9 CORRAOINO . hdeds cnginems 'loners ;A `•r'- ,fist•" "1 rr w t7O _ 4 77jr, / �•� _ r + ~ '` •,. SNE PHASE AtONAI FINE AW D ' = .THE_6' F r rz Alt., AM- -� pOUBIE SEE NOTEL ' �, � - • , }�� r �' SEALINE MARIN ' lY : =.,� - RRIOT - t; i 'Y• �} � _' Y ,�`'l's, � t j .. . � - rte. Yr _ ...• w + Qt VENETIA �'4'• "`�►� �f'." mai �'� i �•��_ a -= z I ST ATI ': _ XIML _ ERFORMIN�� � MIAMI RTS CEN1E .HERALD 4 - �, SEARS+ WER" .. Y '! I"} an BICENTENNIAL PARK -- Aerial View (� C O R F' A ! N» - Miramar Centre Phase Il & ill Hondo 1 L I Project View It; Miramar Centre Phase II & III Miami, Florida I CORRADlNO 01` 199 Ibnnefs CENTER PHASE II and III MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT PROJECT DESCRIPTION ARTICLE U. Description A. Zoning Ordinance No. 11000 1. Section 1304.2.1 Application forms; supplementary materials 2. Section 1702.2.1 General Report 3. Section 1702.2.2 Major Use Special Permit Concept Plan 4. -Section 1702.2.3 Development Impact Study I 01- 199 MIRAMAR CENTER PHASE II AND III MAJOR USE SPACIAL PERMIT PROJECT DESCRIPTION Zoning Ordinance No. 11000 1. Section 1304.2.1 Application forms; supplementary materials (a) Statement of ownership and control of the proposed development of activity. The Disclosure of Ownership and Ownership Affidavit are provided in Article I. (b) Statement describing in detail the character and intended use of the development of activity. Miramar Center Phase H and.III consists of two buildings, a 635 unit high-rise rental apartment building and a 7 story low-rise institutional commercial building located on N.E. 17`h Terrace, between N.E. 4:' Avenue and North Bayshore Drive, Miami, Florida. (the "Property). The development consists of two parcels of land with a net area of 70,330 square feet or 1.62 acres. The gross lot area is 121,473 square feet or 2.8 acres. Phase II is a unique triangular shaped parcel that fronts on both N.E. 17'` Terrace and North Bayshore Drive at their intersection. The parcel abuts Phase I of Miramar Center along the hypotenuse. Phase III fronts ME 0 Avenue along it westerly boundary and N.E. 17'h Terrace to the south. The easterly boundary abuts Phase II and Phase I across an existing 10 -foot wide alleyway. Phase II and III are separate parcels described with separate legal descriptions. Phase II will contain the residential development and parking garage. Phase III will contain a 7 story low-rise office building containing institutional space and supporting facilities. 2 01- 199 These two (2) parcels will stand as individual parcels each with its own improvements totally contained within its own site and in full compliance with the law. Miramar Center Phase II's extraordinary design and high tech appearance and shape will be a major landmark and in the City skyline. The building will be a single tower of 56 stories containing 635 apartments rising above a 10 level parking structure, and a plaza level with lobby, restaurant and ancillary commercial and retail space. Phase III will have approximately 92,260 square feet of institutional space together with support office space. The building will have 4 levels of space above 2 levels of parking. The roof level of the building will have recreation and open space facilities including a swimming pool for the students and employees that occupy the building. The two buildings will serve to continue the resurgence of the Omni/Venetia commercial, office and residential districts and will contribute to the continuing development of the Downtown Miami residential market. Residents of Miramar Center Phase II and employees/students of Phase III will contribute expenditures to support retailing, restaurants, entertainment, and utilization of the People Mover_System,:enliven downtown after normal=business hours. -and in general, expand the quality of life in Downtown Miami. Phase II will have a recreational deck of approximately 20,100 square feet with an Olympic type swimming pool, three (3) whirlpool spas, a Bar -B -Q area, and landscaped areas for sunning, and relaxation. The recreational deck will also have a fitness center with exercise room, lockers and sanitary facilities, a business center, retail space and multipurpose meeting/ party rooms. The business center will not be open to the public. It will contain meeting/conference rooms, office equipment such as computers, printers, fax and copy machine. Secretarial and notary service will be available to users of the center. 91- 199 The Property will also include an 8,500 square foot gourmet, bay view restaurant that is destined to become one of the City's major dining and entertainment venues. A variety of street level retail and service amenities will add to the project. The retail area will be .available to both tenants and the public in general. Drawings showing the architectural character and location of the intended use are included under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. The approximate gross square footage allocation of Phase II is: Main Building and Lobby Parking Garage Balconies Recreation Deck Retail 661,500 square feet 332,100 square feet 105,750 square feet 20,100 square feet 13,200 square feet The approximate gross square footage allocation of Phase III is: Main Building: Recreation Deck Parking Garage 99,300 square feet 19,800 square feet 39,720 square feet (c) General location map, showing relation of the site or activity for which special permit is sought to major streets, schools, existing utilities, shopping areas, important physical features -in and adjoining the project or activity and the like. The following exhibits are included with the Major Use Special Permit Application and are located under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (1) Location Map: Map of the surrounding street system indicating the project location. (2) Area Context Map: Map of the project area indicating buildings and their functions that surround the site. (3) . Aerial: Aerial photograph of the surrounding area indicating the project site. 4 01- 199 (d) A site plan containing the title of the project and the names of the project planner and developer, date, and north arrow and, based on an exact survey of the property drawn to a scale of sufficient size to show: The Site plan is located as Sheet A.1 under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (1) Boundaries of the project, any existing streets, building, watercourses, easements and section lines; The boundaries of the project and the location of existing streets and easements are shown on the survey located under Tab 5 of the Supporting Documents. (2) Exact location of all buildings and structures; The exact location of all existing buildings located on the Property is shown on the survey located under Tab 5 of the Supporting Documents. The location of the building to be constructed is shown on the Site Plan, under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (3) Access and traffic flow and how vehicular traffic will be separated from pedestrian and other types of traffic; A detailed analysis of the site access and traffic flow for the development is provided in the Traffic Impact Analysis located under Tab 2 of the Supporting Documents. Phase IL Vehicular access for residents, and visitors will occur via a semi -circular driveway from ME 17`h Terrace at its intersection with North Bayshore Drive. Valet parking for visitors will be available at the front door. For residents of the Building, ingress and egress ramps, through a security gate with card key access to the upper level parking areas.will occur off the driveway. Service vehicles will access the Loading Docks off an existing alley off of N.E. 17'' Terrace. Phase III: The main entry of Phase III fronts on N.E. 4`h Avenue, and vehicular access for the building occurs on N.E. 17d' Terrace, at the rear of the property. A service drive off of N.E. 4`h Avenue also connects to the adjoining alley to allow additional access to the loading docks. A total of Six Loading Docks service the two buildings. (4) Off-street parldng and off:street loading area; Off-street parking for Phase II is provided within the 10 level pedestal - parking garage, and within the first 2 levels of Phase III. The off- street parking spaces are accessed by the ramps located on N.E. 17" Terrace in each of the respective buildings. Phase II contains 667 spaces, and Phase III contains 96 spaces for a total of 763 parking spaces. The off-street loading facilities are accessed via the existing alleyway between the two properties. Additional access to the loading areas for Phase III can be accessed by a service road on the north side of the property. (5) Recreational facilities locations; Recreational facilities for Phase II are located on a deck, which is on the top level of the Tower's pedestal. Phase III will also contain open space and recreational facilities including a swimming pool on the roof. The facilities are shown under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (6) Screens and buffers; Landscaping and buffer areas are indicated on the Landscape Plan, under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. 6 01- 199 (7) Refuse collections areas; Waste collection will be provided by a containerized recycling compactor system located in the service area areas of both buildings. These facilities -are shown on the Ground Floor Plans under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (8) Access to utilities and points of utility hookups. Access and connections to site utilities are discussed in the Site Utility Study located under Tab 3 of the Supporting Documents (e) Tabulations of total gross acreage in the project and the percentages thereof proposed to be devoted to the permitted uses and ground coverage. Phase 11 73,552 Phase III 47.921 Total 121,473 2.8 gross square feet gross square feet gross lot area gross acres (1) The various permitted uses. Proposed — Residential 4.6 ( 560,963 s.f.) Total 5.5 ( 671,335 s.f.) FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS Phase H - Residential Non -Residential Total Phase III - Residential Non -Residential Total 560,963 s.f. 18.112 s.f 579,075 s.f. 0 s.f. 92.260 s.f. 92,260 s.f. 01- 199 (2) Ground coverage by structures. BUILDING FOOTPRINT Phase II Phase III Total Building Footprint (Ground Coverage) Tabulation showing: (1) (2) 36,800 s.f. (50%) 19,235 s.f. (40%) 56,035 s.f. (46%) The derivation of numbers of off street parking and off street loading spaces shown in (d) above: There are 763 off street parking spaces provided as required by Code. The off-street loading areas are shown on the ground Floor Plans under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. The six (6) loading bays required under the Code are provided according to the plans. Four (4) bays are full size bays of 12'X 35' with a minimum clearance of fifteen (15) feet, and 2 of the bays will be reduced size. A Class H waiver is required for the size reduction. Total project. density in dwelling units per acre. The Project contains 635 residential rental apartments and 1.61 net acres. 500 units per acre are allowed under the Code. The residential project density per acre is: 635 Units _ 1.61 Net Acres = 394 dwelling units per acre. The existing land use Covenant permits 678 dwelling units. There are only 635 dwelling units in the project. 01- -199 (g) If common facilities (such as recreation areas of structures, private streets, common open space, etc.) are to be provided for the development, statements as to how such common facilities are to be provided and permanently maintained. The owner will maintain all common facilities provided for the Residential Tower and the Institutional building. (h) Storm drainage and sanitary sewerage plans. Storm drainage, water distribution, wastewater and solid waste generation provisions are discussed in the Site Utility Study located under Tab 3 of the Supporting Documents. (i) Architectural definitions for buildings in the development; exact number of dwelling units, size, and types, together with typical floor plans of each type. Within Phase I, details pertaining to the number of dwelling units, sizes and types, together with typical floor plans are included under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. The Retail Areas are shown under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. The development will include 635 residential units and 13,200 square feet of Restaurant/Retail Uses. Typical floor plans for the residential floors are included on sheets A-7 through A-9, under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. The retail areas are shown on sheet A-2 under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. Details pertaining to Phase III are also included under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (i) Plans for signs, if any. A building identification sign is located in the landscaped area at the entry Porte cochere, on N.E. 17h Terrace and North Bayshore Drive. Retail/ Restaurant name signs will be located on the storefronts. All signs will be sized and styled in compliance with the required regulations. A separate building identification sign for Phase III is located at the front of the Building on N.E. 4`h Avenue. 01- 199 (k) Landscaping plan, including types, sizes and locations of vegetation and decorative shrubbery, and showing provisions for irrigation and future maintenance. The Landscaping Plan located on Sheet L -1 through L-2 under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents, specify the plant types, sizes and locations, as well as indications that all planted areas will be fully irrigated and maintained by the Owner. (1) Plans for recreation facilities, if any, including location and general description of buildings for such use. Phase lI has a recreational deck where the recreational facilities are provided. The deck will have an Olympic type swimming pool, (3) whirlpool spas, a fitness center with exercise room, lockers and sanitary facilities. Outdoor recreation deck areas for lounging and sunning, a multi-purpose meeting/ party rooms, Bar -B -Q area, and refreshment Bar are also located on the recreation deck. A business center will be located on the recreation deck level which will not be open to the public. It will contain meeting/conference rooms, office equipment such as computers, printers, fax machine and copy machine. Secretarial and notary service will be available. (m) Such additional data, maps, plans, or statements as may be required for the particular use or activity involved. The Drawings submitted with this Application are located under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (n) Such additional data as the applicant may believe is pertinent to the proper consideration of the site and development plan. Elevations and sections depicting the architectural character of the Tower are included under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. A computer generated rendering of the project is also included under Tab 6. io 01- 199 2. Section 1702.2.1 General Report. (1) Property ownership or ownership's and beneficial interest within the boundaries of the area proposed for Major Use Special Permit. Statement of Ownership and beneficial interest within the boundaries of the area proposed for Major Use Special Permit are provided in Article LB & C. (2) The nature of the unified interest or control. The nature of unified interest or control is indicated in Article 1. (3) Survey of the proposed area showing property limes and ownership. A copy of the survey of the Property is included under Tab 5 of the Supporting Documents. (4) Map of existing features, including streets, alleys, easements, utilities lines, existing land use, general topography, and physical features. The existing site features and utility lines are shown on the survey of Property located under Tab 5 and the Site Utility Study located under Tab 3 of the Supporting Documents. The following exhibits are also included with the Major Use Special Permit Application: (a) Sheet LP -1: Map of the surrounding street system indicating the project location. (b) Sheet LP -2: Aerial photograph of the surrounding area indicating the project site. (5) Materials to demonstrate the relationship of the elements listed in (4) proceeding to surrounding area characteristics. The Drawings Submitted with this Application are located under Tab 6 ii . - 199 of the Supporting Documents. (6) Existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan designations for the area on and around the lands proposed for Major Use Special Permit. The existing zoning designation for the Property pursuant to City of Miami Ordinance No. 11000, as Amended is SD -6. The Zoning Atlas Map on page 23 indicates the existing and surrounding zoning. The surrounding zoning is primarily SD -6 and R-4. The comprehensive plan future land use designation for the Property and surrounding areas is "High Density Multi -Family". The zoning and the comprehensive plan designations are consistent with one another. 3. Section 1702.2.2 Major Use Special Permit Concept Plan. a. Relationships of the concept plan to surrounding existing and proposed future uses. Activities, systems and facilities (transportation, recreation, view corridors, pedestrian systems, services systems and similar uses). Article H contains a written narrative of the Project outlining proposed uses, activities and architectural character. This narrative also contains descriptions of the Project's relationship to traffic, pedestrian movements, and transportation access. Maps located on Sheet LP -1 indicate the.P;rcjecfs relationship to surrounding streets, -land uses -and - functions. Building elevations, sections and perspectives ehowing the proposed materials, vertical profile and height, and orientation to streets is included in the Drawings Submitted with this Application. The list of Drawings Submitted is found under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. b. Existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan principles and designations. The Project conforms to the SD -6 zoning for this Property. The comprehensive plan future land use designation conforms with the land use designation currently in effect for this Property. 12 ��- 199 Setback requirements under the Code for Phase II are five (5') feet on the front (NE 17" Terrace and North Bayshore Drive), which is provided, and zero (0) feet on the North (rear) and none is provided inasmuch as the building abuts Phase I. The Code requires zero (0) feet on the West side (alley) where zero (0) is provided. Setbacks required for Phase III are five (5) feet on the West(front) and South are provided. The North (interior lot) side requires (0) feet and 16'1 " feet is provided. The Six (6) off street loading (1) areas are required under the Code and are being provided. Loading areas will meet Code size requirements, however 2 loading spaces will be reduced size and a Class H waiver is necessary. 4. Section 1702.2.3 Developmental Impact Study. a. A traffic analysis shall be submitted for an area within approximately 1/4 mile of the site, or an area including the major intersections to be impacted by the site, whichever is larger. The Traffic Impact Analysis is included under Tab 2 of the Supporting Documents. b. Economic impact data shall be provided, including estimates for construction costs, construction employment, and permanent employment. The Economic Impact Study is included under Tab 4 of the Supporting Documents. C. A housing impact assessment. The Project will contain 635 Residential Apartments. The rents are contemplated are $900 to $1,000 per month for a studio apartment, $1,300 to 1,800 for a one -bedroom unit and $1,500 to $2,500 for a two-bedroom unit. d. A description of proposed energy conservation measures shall be provided, including only those measures that are proposed in addition to the minimum requirements in State Energy Code. 13 (l�_- 199 Architecturally, the building envelope will be comprised of insulated walls and roof. Tinted glass will be used throughout the building. Extensive use of wall shading by means of balconies will be implemented. Electrically, all exterior gnd landscape lighting will be controlled by means of time clocks and photocell switches. Energy saving lamps, ballast's and fixtures are being considered in all common areas. Energy Star Appliances including water and energy efficient washers and dryers will be installed in the rental apartments. Water sub - metering devices will be installed in the apartments to encourage lower water and sewer usage. e. Historic buildings. There are no historic structures located on the Property. L Environmental zone. The Property is not located within an environmental preservation district. 14 01- 199 MIRAMAR CENTRE Phase II &III Wami, Florida October z000 Submdued ante dly'a, �Gubft necom in sowmmkw Witt, item _ �� 00-2=2A--0 / CORRADiNQ Wn ARCHITE(''TURE PLANNING ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION COY Clerk TALLAHASSEE TAMPA FORT LAUDERDALE MIAMI LOUISVILLE DETROIT EVANSVILLE 11 Ilk J. {±h c« .A= ti f _ t:.. " NE 1 EET „� v PHASE q t t 4 INTERNATIONAL FINE .Tv 7 ZEf►CE ARTS COLLEGE;.. kl THE GRAND/ ,{ 3c ^ y ., x DOUBLE TREE HOTEL xi ALS. ' OMNI W BISCAYNf BAY - SEALINE MARIN y ,. RRIOT . VEN ETIA ' S o I fp. Z z i ,p .. any gq - '__k a '; SUbrM"d into the. C.: d. ° i %m eI • I � 1 pj F`> sc "on"2. r�, ' ERFORMIN - ti 4 - ; R`iS (ENI'E MIAMI �► A SEAIS--T „ HERALD R 40 s BICENTENNIAL PARK , r .; ' r' N.T.S. FLORIDA EAST COAST Aerial View REALTY, INC. Miramar Centre/f) ORRADINO Phase II & III r �J F'itects ncineers 'tanners Miami, Florida SubaAtned into the pubtiC recordj,in�co neon nth itenn G—`r"—on Walter Foerrn City Clerk FLORIDA CAST COAST Project View REALTY, INC. Miramar Centre CORRADINO Phase II & III O 199 Architects _npneers Manners Miami, Florida FLORIDA EAST COAST Site Plan Cl,p CIArk REALTY, INC. Miramar Centre CORRADINO Phase II & III9 AF`hlfPCtS --ncl,"PPrs 'IcnnPrs Miami, Florida 01- 5utbsMed 4rlto lhr public record in connecrtlo��wL on It a kvalter FoesW C�, y Cled( N.T.S. FLORIDA EAST COAST Ground Floor Plan REALTY, INC. Miramar Centre CORRADINO PhaseII p illArchiteds-ncineers Tanners Miami, Florida 01— 199 I � i 2 aw - } 1 t♦ (PHASE IIF♦ ♦ . _ 1 r'�k PHASE -Ili N.E. 17th TERRACE i mP L I l I 5utbsMed 4rlto lhr public record in connecrtlo��wL on It a kvalter FoesW C�, y Cled( N.T.S. FLORIDA EAST COAST Ground Floor Plan REALTY, INC. Miramar Centre CORRADINO PhaseII p illArchiteds-ncineers Tanners Miami, Florida 01— 199 St brMtted into the public recd its connection with ite¢n a on 9 kl Wafter Fosman City Cie* FLORIDA EAST COASTProject View REALTY, INC. Miramar Centre CORRADINO Phase II & III 41- 199 Arch tpcts _n, nPPrS � onnPrs Miami, Florida s''1k0 f e P S priF.lrr •.e,w .- +r. , /�f ^ _ � .+! � i`�+.w•`... .�.�.r�ar.�w"iwy.� �...��r ,ter �- Y' :JM ^y •1 ' •V I a _.. � ^" ._ � Vit, •'% +��G.�•'.:5�'t YIY�- � it^s i -. r.i!;«i1:sZi �.-----;r...e Y -rarrf A , r+.,,, - Arm 1 Y ► .+� �*p i 1 e• i' .� t r r Tii a' Yc r , x :.A' � .P r �� ` r .r � ✓,° r � �-� ;,a- .d ii•!a. . .. Y,�: '� 4 i ♦ ' + , . � .w,...alAl1�.'i�� �y� !rw'Alq'��/w t� � _'�. •. - FF ae. 2-1 *. r �.:► R yi .tia..j1 : W.i114...++%Se.',�` �!' W + ei C . a .L' Zt - 4 _w. - . � '.i.M " .f 11$;i _.. � ^" ._ � Vit, •'% +��G.�•'.:5�'t YIY�- � it^s i -. r.i!;«i1:sZi �.-----;r...e Y -rarrf A , r+.,,, - Arm 1 Y ► .+� �*p i 1 e• i' .� t r r Tii a' Yc r , x :.A' � .P r �� ` r .r � ✓,° r � �-� ;,a- .d ii•!a. . .. Y,�: '� 4 i ♦ ' + , . � .w,...alAl1�.'i�� �y� !rw'Alq'��/w t� � _'�. •. - VIP A it � F oop FLORIDA FAST COAST REALTY, [NC_ Subni tted into the public Project Views Miramar Centre Phase II & III Miami, Florida Walter FoeMn City Clerk 01- x.99 CORRADINO Architects=ncineers 'tanners Ito the public >nnection with on X2111_ Walter Foermn CIV Clerk FLORIDA EAST COAST Project Views f � 1 — 199 9 9 REALTY, INC. Miramar Centre Li eJ CORRADINO Phase II & III Archirecrs _n"'neers '°nner` Miami, Florida City Clerk Sub"Red into the public Elevations FLORIDA CAST COASTWalter Foet4l n REALTY, INC. Miramar Centre Phase II & III Cle�c Miami, Florida 01— 199 CORRADINO Architects _ncineers 'tanners FLORIDA CAST COAST REALTY, INC. SubrMtted into Elevations reco Miramar CentAm Phase II & III Miami, Florida connection with L on - i RA-Infmr Foarmn r'4',r Clerk CORRADINO Archilecfs-ncineers Manners 01- 199 CQRRADIN4 ARCHITECTURE PLANNING ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION TALLAHASSEE TAMPA FORT LAUDERDALE MIAMI LOUISVILLE DETROIT EVANSVILLE FLORIDA EAST COAST Aerial View REALTY, INC. Miramar Centre{(� CORRADINO Phase II &III 0 Architects `_ngmeers 'tanners �. Miami, Florida SUbmi into the Public In connection with on �2? Waiter F CkY CANk FLORIDA EAST COAST Project View — — REALTY, INC. Miramar Centre CORRADLNO Phase it & III Architects=ncineers Planners Miami, Florida MIRAMAR CENTRE PHASE 11 AND III MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT TABLE OF CONTENTS I. PROJECT INFORMATION A. Application for a Major Use Special Permit B. Disclosure of Ownership C. Ownership Affidavit D. Addendum to Application for a Major Use Special Permit E. Directory of Project Principals F. Ownership List G. Legal Description H. Project Data Sheet 1. City of Miami Zoning Map 11. PROJECT DESCRIPTION A. Zoning Ordinance No. 11000 1. Section 1304.2.1 Application Forms; Supplementary Material 2. Section 1702.2.1 General Report 3. Section 1702.2.2 Major Use Special Permit Concept Plan 4. Section 1702.2.3 Development Impact Plan III. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS Tab 1 Minority Construction Employment Plan . Tab 2 Traffic Impact Analysis Tab 3 Site Utility Analysis Tab 4 Economic Impact Study Seib"ted into the public recof4l in connection with Tab 5 Surveyof Property I"'� �'" on4— P rtY � Walter FoeW Tab 6 Drawings Submitted City Clerk 01— 199 MIRAMAR CENTRE PHASE II AND 111 MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT PROJECT INFORMATION ARTICLE I. A. Application for a Major Use Special Permit B. Disclosure of Ownership C. Ownership Affidavit D. Addendum to Application for a Major Use Special Permit E. Directory of Project Principals F. Ownership List G. Legal Description H. Project Data Sheet I. City of Miami Zoning Map $Ub(gitted into the public rVOW In connection with uem .�. on obi Wafter Foeman City Cleat — 99 CITY OF MIAMI PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPLICATION FOR MAJOR 'USE SPECIAL PERMIT yr IS INTENDED THAT MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMITS BE RF.QUIRBD WHERE SPECIFIED USPS AND/OR OCCUPANCIES INVOLVE MATTERS DEEMED TO BE OF CITYWI.L)E OR AREA•WTDE IMPORTANCE. , THE CITY COMM.TSSION SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR DETERMINATIONS ON APPLICATIONS FOR MAJOR USE SPECIALPERMTTS. (SEEARTlCLE17OFORDINANCE 11000.ASXMEND W.TNF.ZONING ORD.INANCE,,OFTHE C1TYOr- MIAMI, FLORIDA.) THE CITY COMMISSION SHALL REFHIt ALL APPLICATIONS FOR tAmm usF SPECIAL PERMITS TO T11E PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD AND TO THE DIRECTOR OF THF PLANNING DEPARTMENT FOR RECOWENDATIONS, AND MAY MAKEREFERRALS TO AGENCIES, BODTrsS, OR OFFICERS, EITHER'WROUGH THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT OR DIRECTLY, rORREVIEW,ANALYSISAND/ORTSCHNICALFINDINGSANDDETFRMINATIONSANDREPORTSTHE�EON. (SCESECTION 1301.5 OF ORDINANCE 11000, AS AM, ENDED, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE C17Y OF MUMI, TLOAMA) SECTION 2.633 OF TRE CODE OF THE CITY OP MIAMT, FLOR TDA, AS AMB'NDED, GENERALLY REQUIRES ANY RERSON't+1r1I0 RECEIVES COMYENSATTON, REMUNERATION OR EXPENSES FOR CONDUCTING LOBBYING ACTIVITIES TO REGISTER AS A LOBBYIST WITH THE CITY CLEATC, PRIOR TO ENGAGING IN LOBBYING ACTIVITIES BEFORE CITY STAFF, BOARDS, WMMM'EES AND THE CITY COMMISSION. A COPY OF SAID ORDINANCE IS AVAILABLE IN THE OPPICE Or THE CITY CLERK (MIA.MI CITY HALL), LOCATED AT 3500 PAN AMERICAN DRIVE, MIAMI, FLORIDA 33133. NOTA.- THISAPPLICAT.IONMUST BE TYPEW)UTTENAND SIGNED IN BLACK INK I, Tibor Hollo as an individual and as president of Florida East Coast Realty and Louiq Baron as president of Syncron Parking Systems, Inc„ hereby apply to the Director of the Planning .Department of the City of Miami for approval of a Major Use Special Permit under the provisions of Article 17 of the City of Miami Zoning Ordinance. Property kddress- Anoroximatel'v_17 0 North Ray Shore Drive Nature of proposed use (be specific): Phase JT residential high-rise with ground floor commercial; Phase institutional/commercial use ae ver Declaration of Restrictive Covenant as amended AJPPIACATION MATERIALS I attach the following in support and explanation of the application: 1. Two original surveys, prepared by a State of Florida Registered Land Surveyor within one year from. the date of application. 2. Affidavit disclosing ownership of property covered by application and disclosure of interest form (attach forms 4-83 and 4a-83 to application). 3. Certified list of owners of real estate within a 375 -foot radius from .the outside boundaries of property, (attach form 6-83 to application). Subaitteci Into tptia public 4. Maps of the: reCM in cOnnGotion with (A) Existing zoning designation. Nam t "�� Qui (b) Adopted comprehensive plan designation for areas on and around the p.Fuwmn clerk 5. General location map showing relation to the site or activity to major streets, schools, existing utilities, shopping areas, important physical features in and adjoining the project, and the like. 6. Concept Plan (a) Site plan and relevant information per Section 1304.2.1d -h. (b) Relationships to surrounding existing and proposed futures uses and activities, systems and facilities, per Section 1702.3.2a. (c) How concept affects existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan principles and designations; tabulation of any required variances, special permits, changes of zoning or exemptions, per Section 1702-3.2b. 7. Developmental Impact Study (an application for development approval for a Development of Regional Impact may substitute). 8. Other (be specific): 9. Fee of $ 30, 000 , for the Major Use Special Permit, based on current fee schedule as set forth in Chapter 62 of the Code of the City of Miami, as amended. 10. Additional fee of $ 0 , for any required special permits, changes of zoning or variances set forth in chapter 62 of the Code of the City of Miami, as amended. Total Fee: $ 30,000 r Signature �-- Name Tibor Hollo c/o A. Vicky Garcia -Toledo, Esq. Address 200 South Biscayne B1vd..Suite 2500, Miami, FL 33131 Phone/Fax 305-350-2409 / 305-374-7593 Date FINAL APPROVAL OF THIS APPLICATION FOR MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT SHALL CONSIST OF AN EXECUTED RESOLUTION BY THE MIAMI CITY COMMISSION AND A DEVELOPMENT ORDER ATTACHED THERETO WHICH SPECIFIES THE CONDITIONS UNDER WHICH THIS MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT APPLICATION IS APPROVED; IF APPROVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION, SAID RESOLUTION AND DEVELOPMENT ORDERSHALL, UPON EXECUTION THEREOF BE TRANSMITTED TO THE OWNER OR AUTHORIZED AGENT AT THE ADDRESS SPECIFIED ABOVE. SubWttt into the public record in connection with low �2 on 4aa2 Art Walter Fceman City cleric 01- 199 APPLICATION MATERIALS (continued) T attach the following in support and explanation of the application: 11. General location map showing relation to the site or activity to major streets, schools, existing utilities, shopping areas, important physical features in and adjoining the project, and the like. 12. Concapt Plan (u) Site plan and relevant information per Section 1304.2. J d -h. (b) Relationships to surrounding existing and proposed futures uses and activities, systems and facilities, per Section 1702.3.2a. (c) How concept affects existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan principles and designations; tabulation of any required variances, special permits, changes of zoning or exemptions, per Section 1702-3.2b. 13. Developmental Impact Study (an application for development approval for a Development of Regional Impact may substitute). 14. Other (be specific): N/A 15. Pee of $ N/A , for the Major Use Special. Perrni.t, based on current fee schedule as set forth in Chapter 62 of the Code of the City of Miami, as amended. 16. Additional fee of $ N/A , for any required special permits, changes of zoning or variances set forth in chapter 62 of the Code of the City of Miami, as amended. Total Fee: $ N/A Signature 2— - Name Louis Baron c/o A. Vicky G,3rcia-Toledo, Esa Address 200 South Biscayne Blvd Suite 2500 Miami, FL 33131 Phone/Fax 305-350-2409 / 305-374-7593 Date f 0 M IlDo FINAL APPROVAL OF TMS APPI TCATION FOA MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT SHALL CONSTST OF AN EXECUTED RESOLUTION BY TRI: MIAMI CITY COMMISSION AND A DEVELOPMENT ORDER ATTACHED THERETO WIJICH SPECJFIES TJM' CONDITIONS UNDER WInCH THIS MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT APPLICATION JS ArFROVED; IF APPROVED BYTffE CITY COMMISSION, SAID RESOLUTION AND IaFVELOPMENT ORDER SHALL, UPON EXECUTION TIUMEOF AE TRANSMITTED TO THE OWNER OR AUTHORTZED AGENT AT THE ADDRESS SPECIVIED ABOVE. SObl f'*eid into the pulblic recO in connftflon with a2 on Wafter F00man ChY Clerk DISCLOSURE OF OWNERSHIP w 1. Legal description and street address of subject real property: Exhibit "A" 2. Owner(s) of subject real Property and percentage of ownership. Note: Section 2-618 of the Code of the City of Miami requires disclosure of all parties having a financial interest, either direct or indirect in the subject matter of a presentation, request or petition to the City Commission. Accordingly, question #2 requires disclosure of shareholders of corporations, beneficiaries of trusts, and/or any other interested parties, together with their addresses and proportionate interest. Phase 11 Synchron Parking Systems, Inc., Shareholder: Tibor Hollo 100% Florida East Coast Realty, as Contract Purchaser Owned by Tibor Hollo 100% Phase III - Tibor Hollo 100% 3., Legal description and street address of any real property (a) owned by any party listed in answer to question #2, and (b) located within 375 feet of the subject real property. Lot 1, Block 1, Seaport Subdivision, Public Book 149, Page 79. 1756 N. Bayshore Drove, Miami, FL 33131 Tibor Hollo, as an individual and as President of Florida East Coast Realty, Inc/Contract Purchaser STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE T/1' The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this /(0 day of _mriq 6 C1*_' , 2000, by Tibor Hollo, as an individual and as President of Florida East Coast Realty, Inc, on behalf of the corporation who is personally knoMm to me and who did not take an oath. Name: /4TNLLG oC� Notary ub is -State of Florida Commission No.: My Commission Expires: SUba tied IntO the public reconj In 111 2 COt40 � nl WIIh OFBU NOT R��L 048 �� KEEN Wafter �= NMARY SPATE OF flp(tIDA City Clerk COMMISSION NO. CCn"32 q , R 9 9 AFFIDAVIT STATE OF FLORIDA } )SS COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE } Before me, the undersiened authority, this day personally appeared Tibor Hollo, who being by me first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and says: 1. That he/she is the owner, or the legal representative of the owner, submitting the accompanying application for a public hearing as required by the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, affecting the real property located in the City of Miami, as described and listed on the pages attached to this Affidavit and made a part thereof. 2. That all owners which he/she represents, if any, have given their full and complete permission for him/her to act in his/her behalf for the change or modification of a classification or regulation of zoning as set out in the accompanying petition. That the pages attacr'd hereto and made a part of this affidavit contain the current names, mailing addresses, telephone numbers and legal descriptions for the real property of which he/she is the owner or legal representative. 4. The facts as represented in the application and documents submitted in conjunction with this affidavit are true and correct. Further Affiant sayeth not. Tibor Hollo, as an individual and as President. of Florida East Coast Realty, Inc. STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI -DADS The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this �2 - day of 'i✓T9 nir t2 . , 2000, by Tibor Hollo, as an individual and as President of Florida East Coast Realty, Inc, on behalf of the corporation who is personally known to me and who did not take an oath. Nam Nota Public -State of Flo 8f6d into the OFFIC AItYSEAL Commission No.: F R bth KATHL -E CROCAN My Commission Expires: t 2 � -�h NCaARY PUBLIC STATF Of FLORIDA CiDMtd15:;It7 Va. cCn3o63 "' 1919 r YC dMMtESION 6XP. FEB. 26.2002 Cloy Clerk AFFIDAVIT STATE OF FLORIDA } )SS COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE } Before me, the undersigned authority, this day personally appeared Louis Baron, as President of Synchron Parking Systems, Inc. who being by me first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and says: 1. That he/she is the owner, or the legal representative of the owner, submitting the accompanying application for a public hearing as required by the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, affecting the real property located in the City of Miami, as described and listed on the pages attached to this Affidavit arid made a part thereof. 2. That all owners which he/she represents, if any, have given their full and complete permission for him/her to act in his/her behalf for the change or modification of a classification or regulation of zoning as set out in the accompanying petition. 3. That the pages attached hereto and made a part of this affidavit contain the current names, mailing addresses, telephone numbers and legal descriptions for the real property of which he/she is the owner or legal representative. 4. The facts as represented in the application and documents submitted in conjunction with this affidavit are true and correct. F4rther Affiant sayeth not. �— Louis Baron, as as President of Synchron Parking Systems, Inc. STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 1 j /),✓�,��_ , 2000, by Louis Baron, as as President of Synchron Parking Systems, Inc., on behalf of the corporation who is personally known to me and who did not take an oath. OFFICIAL NOTARY 5EAL KATHLEEN CROGAN NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF FLORIDA COMMISSION NO. CC713063 � 6Z Name: K rgT,q c.eEC C�,91� Notary Public -State of Floiftbr#itted into the public Commission No.: record in connection with My Commission Expires: llem / , j oy,24:�iZfL Waftr Foemn 01- 10 9 City Clerk MIRAMAR PHASE II & III ADDENDUM TO APPLICATION FOR MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT November 2000 Note 1. Request for Major Use Special Permits for: a) Development of a 635 residential high rise. b) Development of parking garages with 763 parking spaces. c) Development of a Phase Development project for Phase II and Phase III of the Miramar Project site. Phase II - 635 residential units Phase III- 100,000 sq. ft. of construction for uses as identified in Section 3 of the Original Declaration of Restrictive Covenants executed on September 20, 1995. Note 2. The above Major Use Special Permits are to encompass the lower ranking special permits requested below: a) To apply for a Class II Special Permit for a waiver of certain requirements of the City of Miami's, off-street parking guides and standards. b) To apply for a Class II Special Permit for new construction under Code Section 601.3.1. c) To apply for a Class II Special Permit for temporary construction fence d) To apply for a Class II Special Permit for reduction of size of loading berths. e) To apply for a Class I permit for permanent recreation facilities f) To apply for a Class I permit to permit the staging and parking during construction. g) To apply for a Class I permit to allow valet parking for residential and other uses. h) To apply for a Class I permit to allow construction trailer. i) To apply for a Class I permit to allow developm nt/construction/rental signage. �`uba4ltt into the public recd in connection/ten with ftwn on _ Wafter I~oeman Cffy Clerk j) To apply for a Class I permit to allow vehicles to back into the public alley. k) To apply for a Class I Special Permit for a Federal Aviation Authority clearance letter. Note 3. Note 4. To request a waiver from the City Commission as to the items listed below: i) from the noise ordinance during the required concrete pours for construction of the building. ii) modification of a Declaration of Restrictions dated 20th day of September, 1995 and amended on the 10th day of August, 1998 previously approved by the City Commission. Said modification maintaining the previously approved density and relocating the 678 units from Phase II and III to be combined in Phase II. Phase III is to remain with 100,000 sq. ft. for uses as listed in Declaration of Restrictive Covenants as Amended. To apply for all lesser permits as may be required to allow development and construction of this project as contemplated under this Major Use Special Permit Application as submitted and per plans on file subject to and including any changes or modifications as may be required as part of the Major Use Special Permit process. ���d�d int, the Pub�• . In C®reCOrdn on 2L24VVM Wa4er F C#Y Clerk 11/07/00 16:01 FAX 3W. is. is% 12= 57PM IM4GL01 : FL -93-30130.2 031 pr 'THAL R05ENTHAL RASCO STOK OFF. NES. Wjuuz N0.01Z —P.2 -- Pmpxmd br P- V-wky utm t rq, 97R02Z 151 3997 JhN 16 16;22 94-t 3esmv- Cella a: Nunn 70L DrWMu AWmaa. Soba ia50 Wft% . pkNA 331!7 9paee Amend for flea!; �CL,Al2AT10N Off' R�S'rat�� � y �� This Dackrwiea of Rescitdve Cavenaum (tbe'Ded%md=,) mads this qQt daty of • 1999. by Tibor M&, an lndlvldUal, sad S'ynehron PuWng, Inc., a Florida Wipotatloa Go'mely beminaltr wfa vA to as the 'Owne), is in favor of the CL'iY OF i MIAW, FLORIDA. a =nicipality locked within rhe State of Florida ftabaflr t refeared to u the 'Cll'Y7- 3 VVE3M AS, the Owner bolds fee -simple tick m caaain Pti PUW in tht: City of Miami, Stam of PkwAs. (We 'Cipr"), iocatad at 1744-1756 N. Styshom Drive. 1783-1795 N.E. 4th Avcuc. ad 407 N.E. 17 Turmx. ML-wfi. Florida, sad legally desenbed as: LATS 3.617.8.9,10.11 and 12, BLOCK S. MMAXAR 3=NMON, ftcc=dng to tho Plat d=wf. as tworded In Plat Hook S, at Page 4 of the Pabiic Rix VW of Dido Cooagt, Florida. r (the 'P[Ope no): sac% VMWAS. the OWM9 is Ptc=Uy as spplioant betom the Gty of !Matti► Cir CommWion for; s d 2np of zoning el=dfi 4d= trots R4 Multi Fsmily Rmkkndd m SD6 Ceatril-CaaxO=cW Residential Dkmict (the 't3aaee of Zoalag') ca ft Pxcpa ir, sad WSERF.AS. the Owner b desirous of making a 6indIng c ammicmane ro aswm that the Propeny &ban he developed, is m ctdsare: tvieh the pmvbUm at OIs Declaration: NOW 7=R=ORR. ft Owner vvltta=ily covemin sad agrees mat the Properly shall +� a.tst<t Y y Irw a- 199 Page 1 or 6 CL �C) F5 .a V 11/07/00 16:02 FAX i JUN.16.1998 12=59pm r"GE01 s )IL -99-30130-2 03/ Rr 'THAL ROSENTHAL RA5CO STOK uF17400M b6 v*JW m the foilowh S rc=icdovs dtac — %tended Arid stmU be de=ed m be cmveo m sunning with the lord and binding upon tbd Owner of the Property, sad io hek7, mors and. asaips as Mow. Stela The ceclads and a-UGO sec favi in the prembie Or this DeeiatadQ%L are baaby adapW b7 sere ttemm and ftorporared berm = If %Uy set W& In t b Seetiam dtl 2 - USE Of Pre...OMIT" Me primeipsl use of the PrWaW sbali be for rraldeoda! davelopmetu =mbdus of two towers comb ft =4 and 436 residential nabs sad a &hd tower cats bft of either a k*W or a rUWe gW Mdl&l& eaa khS 404 =ft. Smdm - A "domes 11m. Aadllary mm7-cm=== al sysm not m exceed 14,000 sq. ft. and 100,W0 sq. It dedicated to dlti following Wowable vsca: ars galleNes. titmum b'hrasim or reheacsd 1100M for performing arts orgardoaeiam tmd other eulamsi uses, thezrers Other tram duveda. a83crs. imdlos or labormoda, eduadand iaSZiBtticn of a business. protbswal or =Irl dfie unmet, privare ahibs, lodges, $amt Wilms and mzvdf*L religiatts and other similar rises; p Y pabSe or private edamdaml fief its. ; OW=<�VIM-`�'am The mWetmal towem and the in esu= botd shall be aGgoed in mean anst of the Propem dame= itr acder to ucommodee view ceaidors rote psopexties tp the vrosc and m Islet ntaxlatynm advxatage of vitt♦► of Biseryne Bay. SMfae rx Freer Am Itmea. The aw= agrees to the mz=nm Honor Asea Ratio (FAR) pearrimtd tnadar tbo =6 moiAF dbaim ?eRfae 7. Mai- - Me AWdgj ftm& The pvt awl= as= m at9mA to the Cky n Maloi Use Special P== appUmSon %vWb, vail xflect *w Umhadon berda i mamamted in this eovmartr. 110 003 N0.012r Page 2 0[ 6 • tted into the public MMMIW �— 199 �eR1 l�conno �with oc waster FO=Inan Ch&Y clerk ll/o;ioo iB:oz r•ax JUN.16.1998 12 t 59PM R' - 1TF 1�1L ROSET(TH�It I?R5C0 STOK �AP1 slaw• _ I" ne -2M aA 01 nz MA H eeiQ i,L.H9. AV-- twUU4 H0.212 ---P-4— — ORecF' 17496PO90 $eedma S. lylefm—im DRtI_ U the City of Mlaml Cat ==don approves tilts Choose of Zoning /as tsgttatted, and after said Approval has become final sad none-appeais6lt, this bzm=ent shall be recorded ht the public Rewzds of Dade Commr upon Gaal Approval by the SML- Of bWA& DcPut mg= of Coamtmaky Affait3 tad sbmiU =Mdtn= a Coveamt tuning with the tide to the ProPety and IW be biadtng upon Owner, its attwuwts told assigns. These restiotlons shall be fttedoa upon all present and fumm owners of the Pmpany► ami shat! be fat tie pmblla aethm Sn¢tiaa 4. Arnetldmmt and MedtRCatien_ This kMM=Mnt roof be nyodified, xne &d, of rtleased as to any poctioa of the Property by a wtitma iasmu=c executed by the thin awm of die ice- WVk title to rile land to be affected by Umh modification. smemimm= or re Ise, pta+tidtng dant same bas beta appro"a by the City of Miami Commission afu r s public hearing which publLc hearing shall be q*Ucd for and at thea wwm of the Owner. Sbowd tris I===eot be so mothfed. amended or relaeued, the Dittetor of the City's Planning NnUding and Zaniag Deparmmem or his sacmm sball execaa A. ww m b= mem in recordable fano eflticmtatittg and achtowledging ouch mottifuadDA xnemk= of rdem., 990011 ]O. MM of QMaM- This Vohmlary Covenant an the pact of the OWM shall zectatn hs OM form ane effmcc and ahaa be binding upon the Owneri in moetams and as lm ft m iaitfal period of thinly (3a) years a'osm The date tide itjsLu n= is r¢eotded in ft Imbue ztxae IN of Dade t cWW ami shall be ffit w m atiesliy exuoded for mccessive period of tea (IM yers a =rdtes or arab die obeaimtnent of a Cetdd= of Ooapamy upon oompladatt of all phases for rites M.iramsc ptojtxt, whichever mesas Base, ttaku modified, tsmeaded or =Used prior to tbn expiration tberwE Upon the isstl8me of the Ce tirmw of Ocompsacy, this • • 7A1�1 •3- Page 3 of 6 WJUUD J.lfu7iuu lts:uz rAx NO. 01Z—"'P.5"—" .7LH.16.1998 12:59PM R' YTHRL ROSENTHAL RASCO STOK • . VAAGEOI : FL98-30130-2 03/17/1998 06-.27.-48pm Page 4 of 6 • ® Coaeaattst ebail eumoem6e54 bo tdW d by the City, without fh TOM soba tt "Ired by the City . 5' Commission. i Radian 11, itee:eendon mi Mm 2t b undemood and agreed that nest' oHSeld iaipecmt of tbn City of WI msri Wray bave the sight aW thme dustng normal aotf5ng hours of entmixg and iavesdgating the um of the Ptopesy to determine whober the omsdidmt of thlt Dedatadon lord the tngnitrmeats of the Cigl's BuMing and Zofmg Rephfmox am being complied with. An etsibo meat. acdon may be bmuch by ft My or by any property owtser wkbin 375 box of the pmpaw by .cion bu law or In cq%Uy sgd m &V ymv orpeam violatnsg or smernpdng to vlobto agy eovesmm of this Deelautton, or pco isiou of die balding and zoning tt;4t Wont, ddmr to restrain viowkw or to mwva demm". 7be pmvslittg Pam In the sedan or stat ftl be ee 6xW to mwvtr ems and mmombte attorney's k". 'lois ea*tt =- provision d au be in addidoa m =V other remedies av OWe under the katy. en „ , uMbtthv ]nvalidatioa of nay one of tse t evensm by judgment of Court shall not affect nay of the odxr BzavL'im of rise Ded=dnn, whie b ahau remain in W Brunt; and d&cL SKd m 13. RemedWg. TWs Dec mz*m sail be filed 'of rrcatd..a=vs the Pub%e R=amk of Dudes Ca=gr, Merida, at the cost of rbcs Owner. • arta.. Cm _ ��• • d into the public reds in connection with ftm &.2 on,21QV-Q1 WaftrF City Clerk 11/07/00 16 : 0 L FAX. MM ROSMTWL RP -'-,CO STOK SLjrj. 16. 1998 1: t�PM R Lvj V.- 11/07/00 Vv N0.O z Ysee 5 0f 6 W W L'MM WMEOF. the udsWpod have set theft heads and mals Wv ,2c day of 1995. WLTNES9ES: ,-, TMOR ROLL.O ��•++ ' SYNCMW PARX24rf, u4c. rY12 �.4,ao� A. Yuo•Ptssidertt STATE OF FLORM& ) COUNTY OF RADEmi ) IU tbmPb* twee MM was aclmawWged befate are *kV- day 1995, by Tibor Hobo, wha !sAy k�m me or wbo hu ptoduoad ^ - - — as U=dit�=d who did (did and ado an oath. (� gra:wiz¢kocw< �.+arA�eCKsrnrrttaFrtaxoow Coam>fssioa NO.. �• ` "tv' w srs--+ra Nmy PuaBc. 3taie of Ftatirda as L.atp ;•. . my Cammusion Expims: STATE OF FL=446 CGUN"1'Y OF DADS . C Jt Mm tatepigg """ mlew was adaoovkdged bd m we Qtle '�di7l of�ze2+�_• 19X by Ph�Iip A. Yatta, Vieo-Psrstdem OCSYNC WN I., a6o is ► Yoaars to tine cc has produced ideatiiusmom (Od m 4 U&e as oat3t. F two n cT C1� �m �thy NOiA1�Y rueuesr.► atoa Ca to= No; C0411r1SS+ W NO CCk7dfS NCffi� ' tK1r Dr twc Stste of Florida oz I R$G My c mmmssiaulkpaei. into the public connection with ? on Wafter Foeman City Clerk ql_-- 199 11/07/00 18:02 FAX TLAy.16.1998 1:01NM f -NT�ROSENTHAL- RASCO STOK A�AG1E01 : FL -96-30130.2 03/17/1998 O6:r:48 l Ire 174051M . � Ste. �3I�A�F�4�mmrt r WHIMPAS. tee Board of Dkeemrs of Syact % Puking. Tw— dmAM to eater into an l 42WAMM with etre CIV of WMnI enured Deekmku of Rent dive Cavtaaat. I r WHEREAS. the Board of 13U== of sywjaot► padit, I= bas cm=btied tesml, i ooadMom sad ObUgad= of the proposed A$tettaent rich ft City; wad VMMPASr . the land of Dbct= ac a duly'held oocpam mxtitlg bas =wddamd tae mstss in somrdon- writ the By -Lays of the sotporadoa. NON, YA'$RFsFOit , BS tT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD Or, DIIt =OR3 of ,sy=i =Pse&g, jar— 49 the VI= -President is bereby W&WiUd and b==d to MM Loco Slid agmw= is the am of and cm behalf of dds tatpmadon with the Cifyr of Miaml Is aer09daae0 with dies senna and owdltlotrs bf ft Deck does of Redia m Cove. nY Wn-, M8 Wil MWP, this .LiCL day .1995. I C caRtot� � 0. ausu d�Mro'�ie'A OM HAMRUMN noes oa�vrene�ar 1— Y09tj i#jUU7 Page 6 or 6 "UtaDrzroitted into the public record, in connection with tWm on =2sa.21 / Walter Foeman City Clerk 11/07/00 16:07 FAX FROM pnp� by: Jerome S Naito. I:�V 100 south Blusyne Boulevard. Suite 1100 Miuni. Florida 33171 10008 9883. 109718 199E AUG 13 141-u Space Rmerved for Clerk 'r RST-M0�jFiCAjJ0N TQ DEC1iLARA310-14 OF RElTRIC11VE This Flr9rModlfscation 4o Declaretion .of Restrictive Covin, enta (the "Modification") meds this: _Z_ of . &uy.:., W �by;Tlbor I�oW.-.and•individuil, Synchron Parking Systems, Inc: a Florida corpration, and 1t+lfiiamar Apartments,. Ltd: 06itifly'hefthtafter.referred to 0 "Owner"), liffavor of the CITY.OP MIAMI, - FLORID•A, a muhlclpalky •tocnted within.the State.of Florida'(horoinafter referred to as the "CITY"). WHERIEAS4 the owner •holdo feo-simplc title to certain Property in•thc CITY; located it'17 .1-756 N. Rayshore DrNe. 17tt3-17.95'N:E. 4'a Avenue, and 407 N,L, 17 Terrace, Miami; Plorlda, an Iy dgotribad a9: LOTS 5,6,7,8,9.100 1 and• 12. Block 8, MIRAMAR SUBDIVISION, according to the ` Plat- thereot,as recorded iii Plat Book 5, nt Pago 4 of the Public,Records of Dade County, Florida and now`known ea: •' ...,w LCiTS 6,7,10.4rtd ')1, Alock•8; MIKAMAR SUBDIVISION, according to the Pint .thereof, asrecorded in' Plot Book 5, at Page 4 of the Public Records of Miami -bade ,.. ty, •loradp; and . LOTSE/1PORT SUBDIVISION, according to the Pliet.thoroof, as recorded fn=Plat i3ook149;'at Page 79. of the Public Records of Miami -Dido County, Florida: and . LOT 2, Black" 1.: SEAPW SUBDIVISION, according to the Plat thereof, as rocorded rd M" r --Book` 149; at Itegtr 79 bf the Public Record; of Miami -Dade County, Florida. (tho "Property'); and tj a WH$REAS,.4he •Owner has previously voluntarily entorod into that certain Det:taratlon of Restrictive Covenants, clated the 20°i day of September, 1995, and recordgd in Nook 17498, Page 179B of the Public Records of Minrni-bade, Florida (the "Doelaradon"),.which Deklnratiott covered the Property; and i VSEREAS, the D=a laration set forth Synchron Parking, Inc, as an owner, the correct Z f y�� which is Synchron Parking Systems, Inc. = C5 WHEREAS,'1he Declaration nllows for the amendment of the same, as to any portion 011 * Prpparty-as* follows; > "by Wrliten Instrumofit by ilia then owner of the foo-simplc title to the land to be affoctod by such modification; amendment or release, providing the seine has been approved'by the City, of Tvlirtmi Commission after public hearing .. , the Bisector of the bity.'s Planning -Building and Zoning Departmatic or his sucecesor !shall execute a g 11/07/00 16:03 FAX rpom :: r6;- : 3©5 358 1619 iQ 009 �uu. 13. 199E e: 22 written instrument in recordable form effectuating and acknowledging such modification, . amondment or reiaase.' ; and . WHEREAS. the City of Miuini.Commission, on October 2B. 1997 hold a.publie 110aring.during,. which the Cityof.Mlami Commission approved by Resolution No. 91-763 (the "Kesoluti.on") the that -the; owner portion of the. Property to"wit: LOT 1, Block J, SEAI10,RT SUBDIVISiON, according to the Pint thereof, as recorded KPlat hook 149. at tinge 79 of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida (the "Modified Portion"), shall be entiiled .to construct 471-residontial units theroon . which Resolution. modifies the 'Peclaration; and WHIREA5, towner is desirous of modifj ing the Declltration pursuant to the Resolution as approved by the Cltyof Miami.Commlosion: NOMiT' HEREFOYIE# the in consideration of the mutual covenants hdrelfi. ;ontained, the Resolution. and the -sum 4Toe D011ers.(SID.'00) and other good olid-velutibio consldtmtioa, the receipt and sufficiency of.which is hureby acknowledged, the following Amcndrrieett to the DcCltiretion shall be deemed to be.a covdhant.runit'ing with the land binding upon the Owner of the Property, and lis heirs, successors and assigns as follows: Sict ion no rocirnl and findings sot forth in the preamble of this Modification are hereby adopted by rtforence thereto and incorporated heroin as if fully set forth In this Sect(on. S c ion 2, The -Declaration is hereby modified to change the name of U)c owner from Synchron Parking, Inc. to Synchron. Parkins Systems, Inc; and Section 3. Section 2 of the Declaration is hereby modified to read as follows: The.principal use of the Property shall be for residential development consisting' of two towers containing 274 and 404 J1 residerttial units and a Third tower consiyting of either a hotel or a residential building, containing 404 units, Section 4. Except as herein madlfied, the Doclaretion shall continue in dell force and effect.. and each of the teff* and conditions therein sot forth, not inconsistent ho,�ewith, are incorporated herein by this reference and remain applicable to the Property, Sect S. This Mtiditicarion shall .be filed ofrecord among the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Fid ri'ds;-bt the cost- of Owner. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have sot their hangs and seals the IQSey of August, 1998. ( / Tibor 10110 Stab"JUd 111th the 13v blic In C*nnecWn- with Walter Fawn aloof ,4�,.IY CPA 11/07/00 16:03 FAX STATC OF FLORIDA ' ) COUNTY 'OF MiAI=DADI~ ,) . The foregoing insulmcnt.was acknowrcdgo before mo this „f_Q-ay'of August; -1998; by Tibor }folly; who is persotjally known to jne or has produced as Identincation and who did (did noc take ah oath. Svorir attd'Subseribed to before me this tolky. of August, 1998. iCATtiLLEN GkiX;�. n TJ O►t'A"KY PfJ9t]C STn'rr 0F;;. �F? ►1�r, : _. �. COMMt.9610N NC% CV1,3+ea (SlgnaI re of Notary Publ c-State.of FI dn) tYCOMM15SIn� �;(1k ;; ?r,.�:p`7 ►�LA1'i3LBSN CROUAN '.tint, Type or Stamped Commissione4"" B" it to the public Name of Notary Public) re i . n cOnne 0ftn vrlth STATE OF FLORIDA - } - on,, ,, COUNTY 0F'MIA7;VAV9 WS&r FcgnIan -Pia foregoing. instrument was acknowledge before me this day of August, 1998, bbyy Louis .Baron, President of Syneliion Parking Systems, Inc, who is persona11 y kttownto me of has produced as identification and who did i ttot) take nn oath. Tye Sworn and Subscribed to before me 1111s ZD day of August, 1998, TEL:.325 358 1619 =+VG. i3. _995 a.02 Synchron Parking Systems. Inc By, . Lottie Baron; President Miramar -Apartments; Ltd;. a Florida;limited Partners h ar Apartments, Inc., Its Getf By. Ph . p Dahan; Vice President The City of Miami Planning, Zoning and uilding Depardnent AR Al.E RAT1�1l.EEN CRMAN (Signa6roofn�-�taoet��erof Naga) Nt7rA.itY t'Ual1C; U�TG t7F Fl Dittq/� 1 +�rR�+w'�, COMMMION NQ CC713M Y �^ Exi', Ffn.2 002 (P(j,, nj_t ? yp , ore , Stamped ed Commissioned Name of Notary Aubhc) tT_ lKt.�, .rte c 11/07/00 16:03 FAX G TEL: 305 358,16-19 im 011 STATE OF FLORIDA ) COUNTY OF MIA!-DADF) �`- The Foregoing lnstruinent was acknowledge before me this /Q day of August, 1998, by Philip: pahan , Vice`Presidont of MiMtnar /apartments, Inc., as sole General Partner of Miramar Apartments, Ltd. who.is, arson kn wn to; a or has produced. -:. as identification and P�—�IIY".�.... TL P who did (did not ) take an •oath. Sworn,and Subscribed to before me thisZ12 day'of August, 1999. -715PPICIZ NUFAAYSCAL. L'v! RY PUBIJC-5TAYE OF FWRTDA igna re of -Notaryublic -State of Florl )' �No cC7t306�:�ti11�115�1t1w F.xi�, FEN: I6,2�2 - kWATM.JMN. CRO- AN Print, Type or Stamped Commissioned Name of Notary Public) STATE OF FLORIDA. - COUNTY OF MIAI-DADS } The forego itlt'iristrument war acknowledge before arae this day of August, 1998, by 0Ut , Director orthe City ofMiaml, Planning.Zoning and Building Department w66.is'personally known "to me or has produced as Identiriehticin'arid who did (did not) take an oath. Sworn and Subscribed to before me this _C dny of August, 1998. ;OOv' AG9 " OFF.ICIAL' NOTARY, SEAL taaTMt:A autinREnc (9lbnature of Not Public -State of Florida) coMMleetoN ..NuMat R. �^�- My OMM18d 0M . EXP, � L'7r/G +eG%L t% nFFI� NOV. (Print. Type or Stempcd Commissioned Name of Notary Public) Subtted rrB� in M t® tltie Rtati on With wr�c�� 11/07/00 16:03 FAX This instrument prepared by and when recorded return to: A. Vicky Garcia -Toledo, Esq. Bilzin Sumberg Dunn Price & Axelrod LLP 2500 First Union Financial Center 200 South Biscayne Boulevard Miami, Florida 33131-2336 Above For Recorder's Use Only) SECOND AMENDMENT TO DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS L9J u1L This Second Modification to Declaration of Restrictive Covenants (the "Modification") made this day of , 2000, by Tibor Hollo, an individual, Synchron Parking Systems, Inc., a Florida corporation, and Miramar Apartments, Ltd. (jointly hereinafter referred to as "Owner"), 'in favor of they C.. _1 O,FMIAMI, FLORIDA, a municipality located within the State of Florida (herepfe;tfeclrl!S,itke "CITY") WITNESSETH o d -simple title t i; Pro e Ci 1 1744 a Own �{.' : _ p 1 P m/ -. P ..-. 'k d... 1 (r .:z. -, (h "fQ2�.'�I'�r�-:•�-r L"r�jri••,rJ :rl J-,-;e�.. 1756 N. shore Drive, 17 3=`1afi95= ,Ave N.E. 17,�, a ace 11711' -J -`Onda and le all scribed as: _{Ini.�=„ .A(.dd.) y rii%!,•. .�,:...{ r �ifl.: "f{(+��r11' ni!`EdinglA .r11i:i�.'nnlnf, J r?iH ifl!.1 {6�':{. � „ ;H �:' ..i{i{'- i1hi�!iP,A{;.;'�x?!x`Ti `�it h1ti. �1''. 17i� 1';-LQs''j -:�, 10,''1 ai'2,.dg ) _ F ' ;:1SIOt� he Plat corded in Plat, County, an and now known as: 41 LOTS 6,7, 10 and 11, Block 8, MIRAMAR SUBDIVISI'f,fiA ccording to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 5, Page 4 of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida; and LOT 1, Block 1, SEAPORT SUBDIVISION, according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 149, Page 79 of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida; and Lot 2, Block 1, SEAPORT SUBDIVISION, according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 149, Page 79 of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida. (the "Property") WHEREAS, the Owner previously entered into a Declaration of Restrictive Covenant dated September 20, 1995, recorded in Book 17498, Page 1788 of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida and subsequently amended by First Modification to Declaration of Restrictive Covenants, dated September 10, 1998, recorded in Book 18231, Page 4529, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, jointly referred to as the "Declaration"; and subnwffeci into the public — reccsrdIn a /n with 99 n on 1 Wrl 49r Foonlan city Cie* 11/U7/UU 16: U4 YAX L9JUIJ Second Modification of Declaration of Restrictive Covenants Page 2 WHEREAS, the Declaration allows for the residential development consisting of two (2) towers containing 274 and 471` r-esidential units and a third tower consisting of either hotel or residential use containing 404 units; and WHEREAS, Phase I consisting of 471 units has been completed and occupied and the Owner wishes to proceed with the development of the remaining residential units consisting of 274 units and 404 units combined into one tower known as Phase 11 for a total of 678 residential units and the remaining 100,000 square feet of institution as a separate structure known as Phase 111; NOW THEREFORE, the Owner voluntarily covenants and agrees that the Property shall be subject to the following restrictions that are intended and shall be deemed covenants running with the land and binding upon the Owner of the Property, and its heirs, successors and assigns as follows: Secti.oFF,,-fir, rg,,Fcital and findings set forth in the preamble of this Modification are hereby adopt ff#: f, A.W.M.1 and incorporated herein as if fully set forth in ��t�s Section. the Declaration is hereby modified to reaAr llows: rm r•ru�prr w � � o il''rr The MU -Me of the Pro•W`n Nr all be fo : ide"rt�.5r; pment {. concis n ,Qiiv;:_1 ers 78 and 7" units a c�r,�'riird tower con' t nia���(��16 00 sd�'�"'� `'re ``r''constru 'I for us k�fs identified in II�4I;.VB 8. 'XEzce t as herei ',jffi "` ed "`, Qecl 'mss `" e m fi47-I U , and effect, and is -�t terms and conditio s� I erein se forth, in '"'ted erew 'r incorporated herein by this reference and remain applicable to the Prope "� Section 4. This Modification shall be filed of recordpr he Public Records of Miami - Dade County, Florida at the cost of the Owner. ;i $' IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have set their hands and seals the day of 2000. Witnesses: Tibor Hollo, an individual Sulsfaltted into the public record in connecftn with Bern eL52— on Walter Foentan 2 City Clerk 11/07/00 16:04 FAA Second Modification of Declaration of Restrictive Covenants Page 3 Synchron Parking Systems, Inc. By: Louis Baron, President LQ U 14 Miramar Apartments, Ltd., a Florida limited partnership, by Miramar Apartments, Inc., its sole General Partner STATE OF FLORIDA ) ) SS: COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2000, by Tibor Hoilo, an individual, who is personally known to me or produced as identification and who (has) (has not) taken an oath. Sign Name: Print Name: My Commission Expires: NOTARY PUBLIC S+ubrnlried into the public -3- recolA jin connection with ABR) / !L_ on Q2Z 01— 199 Walter Foerreut City Clerk 11/07/00 16:04 FAX Second Modification of Declaration of Restrictive Covenants Page 4 STATE OF FLORIDA ) )SS. COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE ) Wj U15 The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of '2000, by Louis Baron, President of Synchron Parking Systems, Inc-, who is personally known to me or produced as identification and who (has) (has not) taken an oath. My Commission Expires: r: 1 S 4 FL• �I III! S: COUNTY_ MIAMI-DADE i e foregoing tt u persockail. �uu %n r pruce tak`at�-� My Commission Expires: STATE OF FLORIDA ) )SS. - COUNTY SS:COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE ) Sign Name: Print Name: NOTARY PUBLIC ' e this ;;,; day o mar ;F ment 4 who is ip (ham as not) Sign Nie: Print ""I4�� � e• ._��' NOTA LIC The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2000, by Ana Gelabert-Sanchez, Director of City of Miami Planning and Zoning Department, who is personally known to me or produced as identification and who (has) (has not) taken an oath. Sign Name: Print Name: My Commission Expires: NOTARY PUBLIC GSul�"4f@ed into the _\DMSV3190\10199\0294677.x1 Public rec0 10/5/00 -4- q in connection with hem (—� on �2 MIRAMAR CENTRE PHASE IIAH DIRECTORY OF PROJECT PRINCIPALS Owner/Developer: Florida East Coast Realty, Inc. 100 South Biscayne Boulevard Suite 1100 Miami, Florida 33131 Telephone: (305) 358-7710 Fax: (305) 358-1619 Mr. Tibor Hollo, President Mr. Philip Dahan, Vice President- Contact Construction: Beauchamp Construction Co., Inc. 247 Minorca Ave Coral Gables, Florida 33134 Telephone: (305) 445-0819 Fax: (305)447-0941 Mr. Donald Crissey, President Architect: The Corradino Group 4055 N.W. 97`h Avenue Miami, Florida 33178 Telephone: (305) 594-0735 Fax: (305) 594-0755 Mr. Rolando Llanes, AIA Vice President Mr. Antonio P. Pardo Project Architect Landscape Architect: Urban Resource Group A Division of Kimberly- Horn and Associates 420 Lincoln Road, Suite 353 Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Telephone: (305) 673-2025 Fax: (305) 673-4842 Mr. Scott Mingonet, ASIA, AICP Mr. Rodrigo Pigna, PE, Projec� 11�er � o r Qlu it►t; PuUaiC in connecdon with Wafter f=ownan Criy Clerk 01- JOG Traffic: The Corradino Group 5200 N.W. 33rd Avenue Suite 203 Ft. Lauderdale, Florida 33309 Telephone: (954) 777-0044 Fax: (954) 777-5157 Mr. Tsutomu Imada, P.E. Economist: Sharpton Brunson & Company, P.A. One Southeast Third Avenue Suite 2100 Miami, Florida 33131 Telephone (305) 374-1574 Fax: (305) 372-8161 Mr. Darryl K. Sharpton President Legal: Bilzin Sumberg Dunn Price & Axelrod, LLP 2500 First Union Financial Center Miami, Florida 33131 Telephone: (305) 350-2409 Fax: (305) 374-7593 Ms. Vicky Garcia -Toledo, Esq. s,jb r,Wd Into gh In cOnnec � public ur1zWith . Weser Cin' Ciera 01- 199 OWNER'S LIST Phase II Owner's Name:Synchron parking Systems Inc Mailing Address: c/o Vicky Garcia -Toledo Esq 200 So Biscayne Blvd Suite 2500, Miami, FL 33131 Telephone Number: (305) 356-N09 Legal Description: Phase III Owner's Name: Tibor Hollo Mailing Address: c/o Vicky Garcia -Toledo Esq., 200 So Biscayne Blvd Suite 2500, Miami, FL 33131 Telephone Number: (305) 350-2409 Legal Description: Owner's Name: Florida East Coast Realty Inc as Contract Purchaser Mailing Address: c/o Vicky C_+,rcia-Toledo Esq., 200 So Biscayne Blvd Suite 2500 Miami, FL 33131 Telephone Number: (305) 350-2409 Legal Description: Any other real estate property owned individually, jointly or severally (by corporation, partnership or privately) within 375 feet of the subject site is listed as follows: Street Address Bay Parc Plaza Apartments 1756 N. Bayshore Drive Miami, FL 33131 „: Legal Description Lot 1 Block 1 Seaport Subdivision PB 149, P@ 79, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County Su d into the public record in connection with S r Fownan Cly Cly 1;� Florida Real Estate Decisions, Inc. 16375 N.E. 18th Avenue suite 300 Miami, F1. 33162 (305)757-6884 r 3195 N. Powerline Rd. Suite 104 Pompano Beach, F1. 33069 October 13, 2000 (954)761-9003 12765 W. Forest Hill Blvd suite 1314 C3_ty of Miami Wellington, Fl. 33414 Hearing Boards Division (561)798-4423 Planning, Building and Zoning Division WWW.FM=„CO3 444 SW 2nd Avenue, 7th Floor Miami, Florida 33130 Re: Property Owners List Within 375 feet of: SEAPORT PB 149-79 LOT 2 BLK 1 1744 N BAYSHORE DR MIRAMAR PB 5-4 �� LOT 6-7-10-11 BLK 8 sd Into the pub AND PROP INT IN & TO COMMON reco�ormcMnELEMENTS NOT DEDICATED TO PUBLIC 3iR1 pDo'#1 1783 & 1795 NE 4 AVE & meatier 407 NE 17 TERR FoerrM C#Y Cte* This is to certify that the attached ownership list, map and mailing labels are a complete and accurate representation of the real estate property and property owners within 375 feet of the subject property listed above. This reflects the most current records on file in the Miami -Dade County Tax Assessor's office. S irycere�g, r l Ra unt /17 cc: A. Vicky Garcia -Toledo, Esq. BILZIN SUMBERG DUNN BAENA PRICE & AXELROD LLP 2500 First Union Financial Center 200 South Biscayne Boulevard Miami, Florida 33131 *Number of Labels: 20_;O_ 01-3231-000-0010 1050 MACARTHUR CSWY 31-32 53 42 28.57 AC PORTION OF CAUSEWAY FILL KNOWN AS WATSON PARK & CAUSEWAY DOCK LYG ELY & WLY MC ARTHUR CAUSEWAY LESS RDS & LESS PORT LEASED TO GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO & PHILLIPS PETROLEUM CO & MIAMI YACHT CLUB & GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO & MIAMI OUTBOARD CLUB 01-3231-003-0440 1820 NE 4 AVE MIRAMAR PB 5-4 S45FT OF LOT 10 BLK 6 AND PROP INT IN & TO COMMON ELEMENTS NOT DEDICATED TO PUBLIC LOT SIZE 45.000 X 105 01-3231-003-0450 331 NE 18 ST MIRAMAR PB 5-4 LOT 11 BLK 6 AND PROP INT IN & TO COMMON ELEMENTS NOT DEDICATED TO PUBLIC LOT SIZE 55.000 X 105 01-3231-003-0460 327 NE 18 ST MIRAMAR PB 5-4 LOT 12 BLK 6 AND PROP INT IN & TO COMMON ELEMENTS NOT DEDICATED TO PUBLIC LOT SIZE 55.000 X 105 01-3231-003-0500 1837 NE 4 AVE MIRAMAR PB 5-4 LOTS 2 & 3 BLK 7 AND PROP INT IN & TO COMMON ELEMENTS NOT DEDICATED TO PUBLIC LOT SIZE 13530 SQUARE FEET CITY OF MIAMI -DEPT OF P&D ASSET MANAGEMENT DIVISION 444 SW 2 AVE # 325 MIAMI FL 33130-1910 MIAMI CHINESE COMM CENTER LTD % SHIH 3804 BAILEY AVE #E1 BRONX NY 10463 MIAMI CHINESE COMM CENTER LTD % SHIH 3804 BAILEY AVE #E1 BRONX NY 10463 MIAMI CHINESE COMM 331 NE 18 ST MIAMI FL 33132-1139 ADER PROPERTIES 1800 N BAYSHORE DR MIAMI FL 33132-1053 Subakted into the public reco in connection with 1AwWr Foeran Chy Clerk FLORIDA REAL ESTATE DECISIONS, INC. CENTER LTD 01- x.99 1 01-3231-003-0520 1745 N BAYSHORE DR 31 53 42 MIRAMAR PB 5-4 THAT 15FT STRIP LYG ELY OF BLKS 7 & 8 & BEING CONTIG TO BISC BAY & RIP RTS AND PROP INT IN & TO COMMON ELEMENTS NOT DEDICATED TO PUBLIC LOT SIZE 15375 SQUARE FEET 01-3231-003-0540 1825 NE 4 AVE MIRAMAR PB 5-4 LOT 6 & LOT 7 BLK 7 AND PROP INT IN & TO COMMON ELEMENTS NOT DEDICATED TO PUBLIC LOT SIZE 13376 SQUARE FEET 01-3231-003-0550 1830 N BAYSHORE DR 31 53 42 MIRAMAR PB 5-4 LOT 8 BLK 7 AND PROP INT IN & TO COMMON ELEMENTS NOT DEDICATED TO PUBLIC LOT SIZE 21579 SQUARE FEET 01-3231-003-0560 1800 N BAYSHORE DR 31 53 42 MIRAMAR PB 5-4 LOTS 9 & 12 BLK 7 AND PROP INT IN & TO COMMON ELEMENTS NO DEDICATED TO PUBLIC LOT SIZE 39535 SQ FT 01-3231-003-0570 MIRAMAR PB 5-4 LOTS 10 & 11 BLK 7 AND PROP INT IN & TO COMMON ELEMENTS NOT DEDICATED TO PUBLIC N/A/U FOLIO 01 3231 37 IVETTE TERRACE CONDO CITY OF MIAMI -DEPT OF P&D ASSET MANAGEMENT DIVISION 444 SW 2 AVE # 325 MIAMI FL 33130-1910 ADER PROPERTIES 1800 N BAYSHORE DR MIAMI FL 33132-1053 ADER PROPERTIES 1800 N BAYSHORE DR MIAMI FL 33132-1053 ADER PROPERTIES 1800 N BAYSHORE DR MIAMI FL 33132-1053 REFERENCE ONLY Sued into the Pub0c record,in Connection with Item -...Z.2 on 3- iL Walter Foeman Chy Cleric 01i i flit, FLORIDA REAL ESTATE DECISIONS, INC. 2 01-3231-037-0001 MIRAMAR PB 5-4 LOTS 10 & 11 BLR 7 AND PROP INT IN & TO COMMON ELEMENTS NOT DEDICATED TO PUBLIC N/A/U FOLIO 01 3231 37 IVETTE TERRACE CONDO 01-3231-003-0580 MIRAMAR PB 5-4 LOT 1 BLR 8 & PROP INT IN & TO COMMON ELEMENTS NOT DEDICATED TO PUBLIC N/A/U 01 3231 047 BAYSHORE TOWERS OF MIAMI CONDO 01-3231-047-0001 MIRAMAR PB 5-4 LOT 1 BLR 8 & PROP INT IN & TO COMMON ELEMENTS NOT DEDICATED TO PUBLIC N/A/U 01 3231 047 BAYSHORE TOWERS OF MIAMI CONDO 01-3231-003-0620 430 NE 18 ST 31 53 42 MIRAMAR PB 5-4 LOT 2 BLR 8 AND PROP INT IN & TO COMMON ELEMENTS NOT DEDICATED TO PUBLIC LOT SIZE 7084 SQUARE FEET 01-3231-003-0630 1799 NE 4 AVE 31 53 42 MIRAMAR PB 5-4 LOT 3 BLR 8 AND PROP INT IN & TO COMMON ELEMENTS NOT DEDICATED TO PUBLIC LOT SIZE 7052 SQUARE FEET IVETTE TERRACE CONDO ASSOC INC C/O WOODS MANAGEMENT 2740 W 5 AVE HIALEAH FL 33010 REFERENCE ONLY BAYSHORE TOWERS OF MIAMI CONDO % JULIO MARRERO 2903 SALZEDO STREET CORAL GABLES FL 33134 JOSE M CALDERON 7930 NW 167 TERR HIALEAH FL 33016 JOSE M CALDERON 7930 MW 167 TERR HIALEAH FL 33016 Submitted into the public reconi in connection h / Waiter F F . . City Clerk FLORIDA REAL ESTATE DECISIONS, INC. 3 01-3231-003-0640 1770 N BAYSHORE DR 31 53 42 MIRAMAR PB 5-4 LOT 4 BLK 8 AND PROP INT IN & TO COMMON ELEMENTS NOT DEDICATED TO PUBLIC LOT SIZE 20790 SQUARE FEET 01-3231-003-0700 1794 NE 4 AVE 31 53 42 MIRAMAR PB 5-4 LOT 1 BLK 9 AND PROP INT IN & TO COMMON ELEMENTS NOT DEDICATED TO PUBLIC LOT SIZE 55.000 X 105 01-3231-003-0710 320 NE 18 ST 31 53 42 MIRAMAR PB 5-4 LOT 2 BLK 9, AND PROP INT IN & TO COMMON ELEMENTS NOT DEDICATED TO PUBLIC LOT SIZE 55.000 X 105 01-3231-003-0720 312 NE 18 ST MIRAMAR PB 5-4 LOT 3 BLK 9 AND PROP INT IN & TO COMMON ELEMENTS NOT DEDICATED TO PUBLIC LOT SIZE 55.000 X 105 01-3231-003-0730 1789 BISCAYNE BLVD MIRAMAR PB 5-4 E15FT OF LOT 4 BLK 9 AND PROP INT IN & TO COMMON ELEMENTS NOT DEDICATED TO PUBLIC LOT SIZE 105.000 X 15 01-3231-003-0740 1777 BISCAYNE BLVD MIRAMAR PB 5-4 E65FT OF LOT 5 BLK 9 AND PROP INT IN & TO COMMON ELEMENTS NOT DEDICATED TO PUBLIC LOT SIZE 49.960 X 65 BAYWATCH APARTMENTS INC 1770 N BAYSHORE DR MIAMI FL 33122-1140 CMS GROUP INC % DAVID T AZRIN P A 44 W FLAGLER ST #2550 MIAMI FL 33131 ABRAHAM KLEPACH &W ESTHER 1785 BAY DR MIAMI BEACH FL 33141-4719 ABRAHAM KLEPACH &W ESTHER 1785 BAY DR MIAMI BEACH FL 33141-4719 ABRAHAM KLEPACH &W ESTHER 1785 BAY DR MIAMI BEACH FL 33141-4719 5+ut"fft d. int'? ft Pu 1 on �2 wawr Foww V DOWNTOWN INC cityfl-led( 2801 NE 208 TERR STE 102 AVENTURA FL 33180-1428 FLORIDA REAL ESTATE DECISIONS, INC. 4 01-3231-003-0750 1770 NE 4 AVE MIRAMAR PB 5-4 LOT 6 BLK 9 AND PROP INT IN & TO COMMON ELEMENTS NOT DEDICATED TO PUBLIC LOT SIZE 53.000 X 105 01-3231-003-0760 1756 NE 4 AVE MIRAMAR PB 5-4 LOT 7 & N15FT OF LOT 10 BLK 9 AND PROP INT IN & TO COMMON ELEMENTS NOT DEDICATED TO PUBLIC LOT SIZE 68.000 X 105 01-3231-003-0770 1771 BISCAYNE BLVD MIRAMAR PB 5-4 E65FT OF LOT 8 BLK 9 AND PROP INT IN & TO COMMON ELEMENTS NOT DEDICATED TO PUBLIC LOT SIZE 49.960 X 65 01-3231-003-0780 1761 BISCAYNE BLVD 31 53 42 MIRAMAR PB 5-4 E65FT OF LOT 9 BLK 9 AND PROP INT IN & TO COMMON ELEMENTS NOT DEDICATED TO PUBLIC LOT SIZE 49.960 X 65 01-3231-003-1150 MIRAMAR PB 5-4 BEG SE COR LOT 1 W151FT NELY95.48FT SELY130FT M/L TO POB BLK 14 & PROP INT IN & TO COMMON ELEMENTS NOT DEDICATED TO PUBLIC Subp4tted into the POW LOT SIZE 109.300 X 53 reP m conn with on Walter Foran City Cleric V DOWNTOWN INC 2801 NE 208 TERR #102 AVENTURA FL 33180-1428 V DOWNTOWN INC 2801 NE 208 TERR #102 AVENTURA FL 33180-1428 V DOWNTOWN INC 2801 NE 208 TERR STE 102 AVENTURA FL 33180-1428 V DOWNTOWN INC 2801 NE 208 TERR STE 102 AVENTURA FL 33180-1428 JAMES RODGERS 1720 N BAYSHORE DR MIAMI FL 33132-1136 199 FLORIDA REAL ESTATE DECISIONS, INC. 5 01-3231-004-0030 1737 N BAYSHORE DR 31 53 42 MIRAMAR PLAZA AMD PL PB 33-18 ALL LOT 3 LESS S20FT E OF ORIGINAL SHORE & LOT 4 INC LOT SIZE 77617 SQUARE FEET 01-3231-036-0010 1500 N BAYSHORE DR OMNI INTERNATIONAL PB 102-3 TRACT 'A' LOT SIZE 386795 SQ FT N/A/U 01-3231-057 OMNI CONDOMINIUM 01-3231-057-0010 1500 N BAYSHORE DR HOTEL OMNI CONDOMINIUM HOTEL UNIT UNDIV .50% INT IN COMMON ELEMENTS OFF REC 18893-1822 12/99 01-3231-057-0020 1501 N BAYSHORE DR MALL OMNI CONDOMINIUM MALL UNIT UNDIV .50% INT IN COMMON ELEMENTS OFF REC 18893-1822 12/99 01-3231-036-0020 OMNI INTERNATIONAL PB 102-3 TRACT B LESS S172FT EXCEPT E5.60FT N/A/U 01-3231-048 VENETIA CONDO 01-3231-048-0001 OMNI INTERNATIONAL PB 102-3 TRACT B LESS S172FT EXCEPT E5.60FT N/A/U 01-3231-048 VENETIA CONDO WOMAN'S CLUB - MIAMI 1737 N BAYSHORE DR MIAMI FLA 33132-1121 REFERENCE ONLY CP MIAMI HOSPITALITY LP 201 E KENNEDY BLVD #700 TAMPA FL 33602 1601 BISCAYNE BLVD LLC 551 FIFTH AVE NEW YORK NY 10176 REFERENCE ONLY SulbrniBted Into the public record,in connection with rain On QUQ2 it Walt®r Fomw Ctdy Clerk VENETIA CONDO ASSOCIATION INC 555 NE 15 STREET MIAMI FL 33132 0 j - 104 FLORIDA REAL ESTATE DECISIONS, INC. 6 01-3231-036-0023 1717 N BAYSHORE DR OMNI INTERNATIONAL PB 102-3 PORT OF TR B BEG 246.12FTS & 154.56FTE OF NW COR OF TR B E330.28FT N14FT W330.73FT S14 FT TO POB LESS PORT LYING BTWN AN ELEVATION OF 1.96FT & 15OFT NAU 01-3231-048-0001 01-3231-048-0001 1717 N BAYSHORE DR THE GRAND F/K/A VENETIA OMNI INTERNATIONAL PB 102-3 A PORT OF TR B LESS E5.6FT BEG NW COR TR B E250FT N20FT E242.30FT 5252.26 W330.73FT S14FT W154.6FT N246.12FT TO POB & AN EASEMENT LYING BETWEEN AN ELEVATION OF 1.96FT AND 150FT DESC AS FOLLOWS BEG 246.12FTS & 154.56STE OF NW COR TR B E330.28FT N14FT W330.73 FT S14FT TO POB 01-3231-040-0010 1751 BISCAYNE BLVD AMD PLAT OF LES VIOLINS SUB PB 109-16 TRACT 1 LOT SIZE 23087 SQ FT 01-3231-041-0010 1790 BISCAYNE BLVD BISC FEDL PLAZA AMD PB 109-77 TRACT A LOT SIZE 83200 SQ FT 01-3231-051-0011 CHINATOWN PB 140-48 S105FT OF TR A LOT SIZE 7445 SQ FT CASTLE FAMILY LTD % KANEOHE RANCH 1199 AULOA RD KAILUA HI 96734 REFERENCE ONLY PARTNERSHIP Subrnitted into the public record in connection with ttm gZ- on 6aLR44 wamr Fownsn City CW* V DOWNTOWN INC 2801 NE 208 TERR AVENTURA FL 33180 HOLIDAY HARBOR MANAGEMENT CORP % CITIBANK FSB - HOLLY CADY - 4041 N CENTRAL AVE SUITE 300 PHOENIX AZ 85012 IVORY ARC INC 17 CHERYL HILLS DR HAWTHORNE N J 75076 01-3231-053-0010 MIRAMAR APARTMENTS LTD 1756 N BAYSHORE DR 100 S BISCAYNE BLVD STE 1100 SEAPORT MIAMI FL 33131-2029 PB 149-79 T-19294 LOT 1 BLK 1 LOT SIZE 45694 SQ FT FLORIDA REAL ESTATE DECISIONS, INC. 7 23 21 -SA 9 11A O 20 S 7 O z j A 8A 1816 N ' I, ♦ Y . s w .o •° 7. .03 ,0 x sc los .o Ixzi) z - S U° ,s z•o ,�� o P •; 2 3 A x l b [,30 s 1 r t. N.E. i9 ST. 45 uj 1 W e ;< >" iy TAry rltllcr V c 7 y 2 I :Sl °.� 3WAC.1 `. a.• � � � 7 W Go ti z t.lie z 10- V • TRW Q N O. • 10 a s. p _I. IS 12 11 p w� V �. (2 114 ss ;s q0' m a as sS w '•n 11.16 zszl s E 18 S T, s, fi - f,,'F s• ,s a 1 a BISCAYNE tae 6 r FEDERAL cc d • °� PLAZA a s 6"A W s II • AMENDED 9 SEAPORT los 1O A (109-77) W o+TINT(149-79) t ol. 13 12 u o Z TRACT A +'.. ea sc. N. E 17 E R R. 2 7.1Q MIRAM/ 3 IL I I { 3 1c PLAZA �c LF IC S. 33-18 a N. E. CB6 ;ss ss ss c o ss s. _ OMNI R O-TIONA.L IO2 -3 e D - = J W 2 '+ 1. 17 15 IS 14 IS I� TR,°GT B 17 l6 IS I• Is ► II to Y O � � I Is :o 2+ zs c o • 3. ELNEET A I r }- W • +•ae PHASE I I I - `. G (107-91j W I TRACT N.E. 1 Q .e I 6 I +� !0 .1 2 3 t e° s, , t Ln1 1 t N.E.15 V f N E T 1 A M CAUSEMAI ASC TkACT- Z 4 �, _174) W Y I S 11 21 ( U PA4GE� "A 0 I Q Z z s 5 ISTI C-2 � <, I 3+ 2 M Y z 1 1, 1 0 SUbMitted into the public record In connection with Nem , - on �� Wer Foernan? Chyy Cterk 1601 BISCAYNE BLVD LLC ABRAHAM XLEPACH iW ESTHER AM PROPERTIES 551 FIFTH AVE 1785 BAY DR 1800 N BAYSSM DR `BEW YORK NY 10176 MIAMI BEACH FL 33141-4719 MIAMI FL 33132-1053 BAYSBORE TONERS OF MIAMI CONDO BAYWATCH APARTMENTS INC CASTLE FAMILY LTD PARTNERSHIP % JULIO MARRERO 1770 N BAYSHORE DR S KANEOHE RANCH 2903 SALZEDO STREET MIAMI FL 33122-1140 1199 AULOA RD CORAL GABLES FL 33134 XAILUA HI 96734 CITY OF MIAMI -DEPT OF P&D CMS GROUP INC CP MIAMI BOSPITALITY LY ASSET MANAGEMENT DIVISION % DAVID T AZRIN P A 201 E MOMEDY BLVD 6700 444 SW 2 AVE 6 325 44 W FLAGLER ST 62550 TAMPA FL 33602 MIAMI FL 33130-1910 MIAMI FL 33131 HOLIDAY HARBOR MANAGEMENT CORP IVETTE TERRACE CONDO ASSOC INC IVORY ARC INC $ CITIBANX FSB - HOLLY CADY - C/O WOODS MANAGEMENT 17 CHERYL HILLS DR 4641 N CENTRAL AVE SUITE 300 2740 W 5 AVE HAWTHORNS N J 75076 PHOENIX AT. 85012 HIALEAH FL 33010 .LPM-S RODGERS JOSE M CALDERON MIAMI CHINESE COMM CENTER LTD 1720 N BAYSHORE DR 7930 NW 167 TERR S SHIN MIAMI FL 33132-1136 HIALEAH FL 33016 3804 BAILEY AVE 6E1 BRONX NY 10463 :f1AMI CHINESE COMA CENTER LTD MIRAMAR APARTMENTS LTD V DOWNTOWN INC 331 NE 18 ST 100 S BISCAYNE BLVD STE 1100 2801 NE 208 TERR 6102 MIAMI FL 33132-1139 MIAMI FL 33131-2029 AVENTURA FL 33180-1428 VENETIA CONDO ASSOCIATION INC WOMAN'S CLUB - MIAMI 555 NE 15 STREET 1737 N BAYSHORE DR MIAMI FL 33132 MIAMI FLA 33132-1121 submi hm 5ra u dyer pubjjC recoq in connection wfth Own /c, Waftr F City Ctt MIRAMAR CENTRE PHASE II AND PHASE III LEGAL DESCRIPTION PHASE II LOT 2, BLOCK 1, SEAPORT, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 149, PAGE 79, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA. PHASE III LOTS 6, 7, 10 & 11, BLOCK 8 OF MIRAMAR ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 5, PAGE 4 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA. SUbrMftd into the public record In conne eWn with Wafter Fownan cr€y Clerk 01- 199 MIRAMAR CENTRE PHASE II and PHASE III Project Data ■ ZONING CLASIFICATION SD -6 ■ NET LOT AREA Phase 11 ........................ 41,762 s.f. Phase III ........................ 28.568 s.f. Total Net Lot Area .................. 70,330 s.f. ■ GROSS LOT AREA Phase II ........................ 73,552 s.f. Phase III ........................ 47.921 s.f. Total Gross Lot Area .............. 121,473 s.f. ■ DENSITY Dwelling Units Allowed per Covenant .................... 678 Units Dwelling Units Proposed ...................................... 635 Units ■ FAR Allowable - Residential ............................................... 7.2 ( 874,606 s.f.) Total ...................................................... 8.4 (1,020,373 s.f.) Proposed — Residential .............................................. 4.6 ( 560,963 s.f.) Total ...................................................... 5.5 ( 671,335 s.f.) SubrMited irate the pub," reco� OWE Winner Foran cfty Clerk 199 ■ FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS Phase II - Residential ............................................... 560,963 s.f. Non -Residential ......................................... 18.112 s.f. Total.........................................4............ 579,075 s.f. Phase III - Residential ............................................... 0 s.f. Non -Residential ......................................... 92.260 s.f. Total ...................................................... 92,260 s.f. ■ SETBACKS Phase II - Front (NE 17th Terrace I North Bayshore Drive) Required .................................................. 5'-0" Proposed ............................. 5'-0" Side (Alley) Required.................................................. 0'-0" Proposed ................................................. 0'-0" Rear (North Property Line) Required .................................................. 0'-0" Proposed................................................. 0'-0" Phase III - Front (NE 4th Avenue) Required .................................................. 5'-0" Proposed ................................................. 5'-0" Side (NE 17th Terrace) Required.................................................. 5'-0" Proposed ................. 5'-0" Side (Interior Lot) 0'-0" Proposed ................................................. 16'-1 " Rear (Alley) Required. 0'-0" Proposed................................................. 2'-6" itibim oo PUO iic recoM., in connecton with IMM on s24 Wafter Foemn City Clerk 01- 199 ■ OPEN SPACE (GREEN SPACE) / PRIVATE RECREATION SPACE Required - 110,372 s.f. (Non-residential) ................................. 1,208 s.f. (1 s.f./ 50 s.f. over 50,000 s.f.) 560,963 s.f, (Residential) ..................................... 56.096 s.f. (1 s.f./ 10 s.f.) Total .............................................. 57,304 s.f. Proposed - Phase II - Ground Level ....................................... 1,945 s.f. Phase Il - Recreation Level ................................... 20,493 s.f. Phase I! - Recreation Rooms ................................ 3,250 s.f. Phase Il - Roof ................................................... 12,543 s.f. Phase III - Ground Level ...................................... 1,595 s.f. Phase III - Recreation Level .................................. 21,000 s.f. Total ............................................... 60,826 s.f. ■ OFFSTREET PARKING Required - Apartments (635 units) ................................ 635 Parking Spaces Retail (1,700 s.f)....................................... 2 Parking Spaces Restaurant & Cafe(11,500 s.f.)..................... 15 Parking Spaces Institutional (92,260 s.f.)............................. 93 Parking Spaces Total .................................... 745 Parking Spaces Provided - Phase II - Standard + H.C. Parking Spaces.......... 667 Parking Spaces Phase III - Standard + H.C. Parking Spaces.......... 96 Parking Spaces Total .................................... 763 Parking Spaces Accessible Parking Spaces Submitted into the public in connection with Phase II - i 2-,:9 on-?�-2 Required ................................ 15 Spaces Wafter Foeman Provided ................................ 15 Spaces City Clerk Phase III - Required ................................ 4 Spaces Provided ................................ 4 Spaces o i - 199 ■ LOADING BERTHS Required......................................................... 6 Loading Berths Proposed.......................................................... 6 Loading Berths (Class II waiver required for size reduction) ■ HEIGHT Allowable.......................................................... Unlimited Proposed.......................................................... 529'-8" ■ BUILDING FOOTPRINT Phase ll ........................ 36,800 s.f. Phase III ........................19,235 s.f. Total Building Footprint ............. 56,035 s.f. ■ GROSS FLOOR AREA Phase 11 ........................ 1,022,923 s.f. Phase I I I ........................ 151,415 s.f. Total Gross Floor Area .............. 1,174,338 s.f. ■ APARTMENT DISTRIBUTION Studio 1 -Bedroom 2- Bedroom 11th Floor 9 units 0 units 2 units 12th Floor 18 units 0 units 4 units 14th -56th (43 Floors) 86 units 344 units 172 units 113 units 344 units 178 units Total No. of Apartments ...................... 635 units Sulbn,dr�,vu ifav vn- PubliC recovd in eonrtiec. on with iDem i=- on 4,41 1Msiter Foeman City Clerk . • i � A en � 23 21 a w ` �e .•{ S 1 !O ST p 1. A e Is so to 16 1• .O 10 7A 603 Oil to • t0% • 00 [ ler•) ' e 3 � S snI .s r•� � ' • 3 Z A 4 1 { • S 3: p, 1 a � d.. N.E. i9 f 's j�' s. �. � � T �. �N � 7• v'� 116 � IL � 10 �y w• 1� 4 } N O. T � s Zai 10 era i1 ss a { m d w •.t a• : z s • 3 • r. s s to a z'ae J • BISCAYNE o FEDERAL •• PLAZA tao 11 , AMENDED z S _ • °los to A (109—TT) LU ' Ui TRACT1iAu � vi N 13 12 ea n'^ ?Z ss O G• E l7� R. . � � IL 1 13 �► PLAZ » tL . . o0 3i S!• 2•V IG U ZS 22, '+ 21, Is 1' 16 N.E. CBD •6 s ss . ss �• : s • OMNI I N TE ATIONAL, tox —3 I t _ J !i t3 M TRACT 'q w - TR.•CT 8 O li 16 Is 1• ► II 10 Y A 1 =s 1E 43:O Si 3 i ' b i+ VPLAZAENTIA �-- J� o 0016911 E. 1TQ.ACT C. TRACT °A• a• o 63- CAUS[MA Y toot T I A N LL! _ N• E. 15 � A -SC rKAcr •Z 5 4 w -nay • r + JIiDC�liifi'Ci t!'tECi CrtguCtI1C N.T.S. 1'ecOn connection with &Wr Foermn Zoning Map Clity Clerk FLORIDA EAST COAST REALTY, INC. Miramar Centre 199 01— CORRADINO Ar hlte is _ �Ic �e s Phase II &III pree s Miami, Florida MIRAMAR CENTER PHASE II and III MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT PROJECT DESCRIPTION ARTICLE II. Description A. Zoning Ordinance No. 11000 1. Section 1304.2.1 Application forms; supplementary materials 2. Section 1702.2.1 General Report 3. Section 1702.2.2 Major Use Special Permit Concept Plan 4. Section 1702.2.3 Development Impact Study Subrrdfted Into the Public record Own Z on WAP FoaffWn 1 CRY Qwk 01- 199 MIRAMAR CENTER PHASE H AND III MAJOR USE SPACIAL PERMIT SubrOigtod into the Public connection PROJECT DESCRIPTION in c t�c�o�n with Zoning Ordinance No. 11000 Waiter QUI Foermn 1. Section 1304.2.1 Application forms; supplementary materials cry Clerk (a) Statement of ownership and control of the proposed development of activity. The Disclosure of Ownership and Ownership Affidavit are provided in Article I. (b) Statement describing in detail the character and intended use of the development of activity. Miramar Center Phase II and III consists of two buildings, a 635 unit high-rise rental apartment building and a 7 story low-rise institutional commercial building located on N.E. 17'' Terrace, between N.E. 4`h Avenue and North Bayshore Drive, Miami, Florida. (the "Property"). The development consists of two parcels of land with a net area of 70,330 square feet or 1.62 acres. The gross lot area is 121,473 square feet or 2.8 acres. Phase II is a unique triangular shaped parcel that fronts on both N.E. 17`h Terrace and North Bayshore Drive at their intersection. The parcel abuts Phase I of Miramar Center along the hypotenuse. Phase III fronts ME 4`h Avenue along it westerly boundary and N.E. 17`h Terrace to the south. The easterly boundary abuts Phase II and Phase I across an existing 10 -foot wide alleyway. Phase II and III are separate parcels described with separate legal descriptions. Phase II will contain the residential development and parking garage. Phase III will contain a 7 story low-rise office building containing institutional space and supporting facilities. 2 0-1— 199 These two (2) parcels will stand as individual parcels each with its own improvements totally contained within its own site and in full compliance with the law. Miramar Center Phase II's extraordinary design and high tech appearance and shape will be a major landmark and in the City skyline. The building will be a single tower of 56 stories containing 635 apartments rising above a 10 level parking structure, and a plaza level with lobby, restaurant and ancillary commercial and retail space. Phase III will have approximately 92,260 square feet of institutional space together with support office space. The building will have 4 levels of space above 2 levels of parking. The roof level of the building will have recreation and open space facilities including a swimming pool for the students and employees that occupy the building. The two buildings will serve to continue the resurgence of the OmniNenetia commercial, office and residential districts and will contribute to the continuing development of the Downtown Miami residential market. Residents of Miramar Center Phase II and employees/students of Phase III will contribute expenditures to support retailing, restaurants, entertainment, and utilization of the People Mover System, enliven downtown after normal business hours and in general, expand the quality of life in Downtown Miami. Phase II will have a recreational deck of approximately 20,100 square feet with an Olympic type swimming pool, three (3) whirlpool spas, a Bar -B -Q area, and landscaped areas for sunning, and relaxation. The recreational deck will also have a fitness center with exercise room, lockers and sanitary facilities, a business center, retail space and multipurpose meeting/ party rooms. The business center will not be open to the public. It will contain meeting/conference rooms, office equipment such as computers, printers, fax and copy machine. Secretarial and notary service will be available to users of the center. sutgj'Ati'aa into ileo, PUWc Wafter Foemn city Clerk The Property will also include an 8,500 square foot gourmet, bay view restaurant that is destined to become one of the City's major dining and entertainment venues. A variety of street level retail and service amenities will add to the project. The retail area will be available to both tenants and the public in general. Drawings showing the architectural character and location of the intended use are included under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. The approximate gross square footage allocation of Phase II is: Main Building and Lobby Parking Garage Balconies Recreation Deck Retail 661,500 square feet 332,100 square feet 105,750 square feet 20,100 square feet 13,200 square feet The approximate gross square footage allocation of Phase III is: Main Building: Recreation Deck Parking Garage 99,300 square feet 19,800 square feet 39,720 square feet (c) General location map, showing relation of the site or activity for which special permit is sought to major streets, schools, existing utilities, shopping areas, important physical features in and adjoining the project or activity and the like. The following exhibits are included with the Major Use Special Permit Application and are located under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (1) Location Map: Map of the surrounding street system indicating the project location. (2) Area Context Map: Map of the project area indicating buildings and their functions that surround the site. (3) Aerial: Aerial photograph of the surrounding area indicating the project site. SUblMned aotc tl'-ae pub►tc 4 recoin ct�W10 wi (d) A site plan containing the title of the project and the names of the project planner and developer, date, and north arrow and, based on an exact survey of the property drawn to a scale of sufficient size to show: The Site plan is located as Sheet A.I under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (1) Boundaries of the project, any existing streets, building, watercourses, easements and section lines; The boundaries of the project and the location of existing streets and easements are shown on the survey located under Tab 5 of the Supporting Documents. (2) Exact location of all buildings and structures; The exact location of all existing buildings located on the Property is shown on the survey located under Tab 5 of the Supporting Documents. The location of the building to be constructed is shown on the Site Plan, under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (3) Access and traffic flow and how vehicular traffic will be separated from pedestrian and other types of traffic; A detailed analysis of the site access and traffic flow for the development is provided in the Traffic Impact Analysis located under Tab 2 of the Supporting Documents. Phase II: Vehicular access for residents, and visitors will occur via a semi -circular driveway from ME 17th Terrace at its intersection with North Bayshore Drive. Valet parking for visitors will be available at the front door. For residents of the Building, ingress and egress ramps, through a security gate with card key access to the upper level parking areas will occur off the driveway. Subralt ed into the public recorA in conneftion with Walter Foarnan City Cierko I — 9 9 of the Supporting Documents. (6) Existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan designations for the area on and around the lands proposed for Major Use Special Permit. The existing zoning designation for the Property pursuant to City of Miami Ordinance No. 11000, as Amended is SD -6. The Zoning Atlas Map on page 23 indicates the existing and surrounding zoning. The surrounding zoning is primarily SD -6 and R-4. The comprehensive plan future land use designation for the Property and surrounding areas is "High Density Multi -Family". The zoning and the comprehensive plan designations are consistent with one another. 3. Section 1702.2.2 Major Use Special Permit Concept Plan. a. Relationships of the concept plan to surrounding existing and proposed future uses. Activities, systems and facilities (transportation, recreation, view corridors, pedestrian systems, services systems and similar uses). Article II contains a written narrative of the Project outlining proposed uses, activities and architectural character. This narrative also contains descriptions of the Project's relationship to traffic, pedestrian movements, and transportation access. Maps located on Sheet LP -1 indicate the Project's relationship to surrounding streets, land uses and functions. Building elevations, sections and perspectives showing the proposed materials, vertical profile and height, and orientation to streets is included in the Drawings Submitted with this Application. The list of Drawings Submitted is found under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. b. Existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan principles and designations. The Project conforms to the SD -6 zoning for this Property. The comprehensive plan future land use designation conforms with the land use designation currently in effect for this Property. Sobmitted into the public with 12 recce in cc �ctio I on NW YdaWFoeman Cyt - 199 Setback requirements under the Code for Phase II are five (5') feet on the front (NE 17`h Terrace and North Bayshore Drive), which is provided, and zero (0) feet on the North (rear) and none is provided inasmuch as the building abuts Phase I. The Code requires zero (0) feet on the West side (alley) where zero (0) is provided. Setbacks required for Phase III are five (5) feet on the West(front) and South are provided. The North (interior lot) side requires (0) feet and 16'1" feet is provided. The Six (6) off street loading (1) areas are required under the Code and are being provided. Loading areas will meet Code size requirements, however 2 loading spaces will be reduced size and a Class II waiver is necessary. 4. Section 1702.2.3 Developmental Impact Study. a. A traffic analysis shall be submitted for an area within approximately 1/4 mile of the site, or an area including the major intersections to be impacted by the site, whichever is larger. The Traffic Impact Analysis is included under Tab 2 of the Supporting Documents. b. Economic impact data shall be provided, including estimates for construction costs, construction employment, and permanent employment. The Economic Impact Study is included under Tab 4 of the Supporting Documents. sub , recOrAln cow a —ho r W1 C. A housing impact assessment. ice,2_ 2 on wafter FOOMM The Project will contain 635 Residential Apartments. The rents 0* Cie* contemplated are $900 to $1,000 per month for a studio apartment, $1,300 to 1,800 for a one -bedroom unit and $1,500 to $2,500 for a two-bedroom unit. d. A description of proposed energy conservation measures shall be provided, including only those measures that are proposed in addition to the minimum requirements in State Energy Code. 13 01— 199 Architecturally, the building envelope will be comprised of insulated walls and roof. Tinted glass will be used throughout the building. Extensive use of wall shading by means of balconies will be implemented. Electrically; all exterior and landscape lighting will be controlled by means of time clocks and photocell switches. Energy saving lamps, ballast's and fixtures are being considered in all common areas. Energy Star Appliances including water and energy efficient washers and dryers will be installed in the rental apartments. Water sub - metering devices will be installed in the apartments to encourage lower water and sewer usage. e. Historic buildings. There are no historic structures located on the Property. L Environmental zone. The Property is not located within an environmental preservation district. 14 S "WKWO OnTO 1j)o public record in connection with �z on 21a.Z WA4--r Foeman City Clerk 01- 1.9 9 MIRAMAR CENTRE PHASE II AND III MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS ARTICLE III Supporting Documents Tab 1 Minority Construction Employment Plan Tab 2 Traffic Impact Analysis Tab 3 Site Utility Study Tab 4 Economic Impact Study Tab 5 Survey of Property Tab 6 Drawings Submitted PUnIIC recorO,in connection with on :e /,,, Waller Foeman cny Clerk 1— 199 MIRAMAR CENTRE PHASE II AND III MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT MINORITY CONSTRUCTION EMPLOYMENT PLAN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY STATEMENT Stag €t0d into the public MON in connechon with Wm =� o AeA2Z4 - Prepared by Florida East Coast Realty, Inc. Walter Fowvn Ctiy Clerk 01- 199 CORPORATE STATEMENT: Florida East Coast Realty, Inc. is committed to ensure that our organization, and the organizations with which we contract, reflects the cultural and ethnic diversity of the areas within which we operate. To this end, we warrant to administer ourselves in such a manner as to guarantee equal and fair employment practices. We shall not discriminate with regards to race, color, religion, sex, age, national origin, handicap or veteran status. POLICY: Recruitment, selection, placement and layoff decisions will be based solely on candidates or contractors job related qualifications and abilities, consistent with job requirements. All employees, job applicants' and/ or contractors are guaranteed equal employment opportunity without regard for race, color, religion, sex, national origin, handicap or veteran status. Personnel policies and practices including compensation, benefits, safety and health programs will be so governed. Furthermore, all necessary steps will be taken to ensure that each employees work environment, regardless of corporate origin, is free from unlawful discrimination of harassment of any kind related to race, color, religion, sex, age, national origin, handicap or veteran status. Public reC0rd in co"neebon with t ;2_ can Wetter Foeman City cleat 01- 199 SMITH CORRADIN ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLANNERS CONSTRUCTORS DECLARATION OF POLICY In accordance with requirements of Miami Dade County Ordinance 82-37, Ordinance 98-30 and Resolution No. 1049.93, The Corradino Group, Inc. D/B/A Carr Smith Corradino affirms its commitment to the submittal of an Affirmative Action Plan for the purpose of maintaining equal employment and promotional opportunity, with particular emphasis on the minority workforce population and the utilization of minority professional firms, consultants and/or suppliers. CHIEF CITWE OFFICER Jose C. Corradino, PE Date: 12/23/99 AFFIRMAT)W A6=fFFICER Joseph M. Corradino, AICP Date: 12/23/99 Division Vice President AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PLAN /AnnPP--ROVE�D/ BY DBD Miami Dade County Representing Authority Date BATE J;� f3 % `T y �1 SubeINtted into the public recd in connection with Item �2'.2- on 42 1d Waltor Foeman City Clerk Oi- 199 4055 NW 97th AVENUE • MIAMI, FLORIDA 33178 TEL 305.594.0735• FAX 305.594.0755 U/U/lA/ f-^DDAnski 1 rnt„t BEAUCHAMP CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. GENERAL CONTRACTORS • 247 MINORCA AVENUE, CORAL GABLES, FL 33134-4405 305-445-0819 • FAX 305-447-0941 JAMES B.D. BEAUCHAMP, Chief Executive Officer DONALD L CRISSEY, President DEAN A. THOMAS. Executive Vice President BURNETT G. FIRSTENBURGER, Vice President MARIBEL HART, Treasurer DECLARATION OF POLICY In accordance with Dade County Ordinance 82-37, Ordinance 98-30 and Resolution No. 1049-93, Beauchamp Construction Company affirms its commitment to the submittal of an Affirmative Action Plan for the purpose of maintaining equal employment and promotional opportunity, with a particular emphasis on the minority and women workforce population and the utilization of minority and women owned professional firms, consultants, and/or suppliers • Cronald. L Crissey Da e President 0o Malribel Hart Dat Affirmative Action Officer Submitted into the public record In connection with Water Fownan City Clerk 01- 199 vV1. . •ttjtu L-1JI I1 rvv.j(b r.e-1d '' f'r y1 •q'Ir� 7 DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT September 1112000 .f Ms. Lisette Martinez Beauchamp Construction Company, Inc. 247 Minorca Avenue Coral Gables, FL 33134-4405 RE: Affirmative Action Plan (No. 00963 1) Dear Ms. Martinez; Your Affirmative Action Plan for 2000 - 2001 has been approved, A copy of your Declaration of Policy is enclosed for display in a conspicuous location within your facility. This approval is effective until September 30, 2001. You should submit an updated plan to this office thirty days prior to the expiration date. In the event of a change in the firm's name, address, telephone number or dissolution of the firm, please notify this office. If you have any question, please contact Mrs. Maria Machado at the address or telephone number indicated below. Sincerely, Vincent T, Brown, Esq. Assistant Director Submi ted into the public record In connection with hmn on a,4atl Wafter Foe'r n MIAM Cir Clerk BEAUCHAMP CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. GENERAL CONTRACTORS - 247 MINORCA AVENUE, CORAL GABLES, FL 331344405 305-445-0819 - FAX 305-447-0941 JAMES B.D. BEAUCHAMP, Chief Executive Officer DONALD L CRISSEY, President DEAN A. THOMAS, Executive Vice President BURNETT G. FIRSTENBURGER, Vice President MARIBEL HART, Treasurer MEMORANDUM DATE: May 1, 2000 TO: All employees FROM: Donald L. Crissey SUBJECT: Affirmative Action Plan DADE COUNTY AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PLAN DECLARATION OF POLICY — In accordance with Miami Dade County Resolution 1049-93, Ordinance 82-37 and Ordinance 98-30. Beauchamp Construction Company affirms its commitment to the submittal of an Affirmative Action Plan which has the purpose of maintaining equal employment and promotional opportunity, with a particular emphasis on improving the minority and/or women workforce population and utilization of minority and/or women owned professional firms, consultants, and/or suppliers. Special meetings will be conducted with executive management and supervisory personnel to explain the intent of the plan and individual responsibility for effective implementation, making clear my commitment to the program. Additionally, the plan will be discussed at employee orientations and management training programs. Outside sources such as recruiters, subcontractors, vendors and suppliers will be informed verbally, and in writing about our affirmative action policies. Maribel Hart, is hereby appointed the firm's Affirmative Action Officer. She will have the day-to-day responsibility for the implementation and monitoring of our plan. The Affirmative Action Plan is available for your review during normal working hours. For review of the plan, please contact Maribel Hart. S,Ubvotted into the public 01— 199 r®co0�„ n co e ItectiDn withm Walr Fin NAADMINW}irmathro AdIoMA�IRMATIVE ACTION MEMO OO.dm City Clerk Service vehicles will access the Loading Docks off an existing alley off of N.E. 17th Terrace. Phase III: The main entry of Phase III fronts on N.E. 4th Avenue, and vehicular access for the building occurs on N.E. 17th Terrace, at the rear of the property. A service drive off of N.E. 4th Avenue also connects to the adjoining alley to allow additional access to the loading docks. A total of Six Loading Docks service the two buildings. (4) Off-street parking and off-street loading area; Off-street parking for Phase II is provided within the 10 level pedestal - parking garage, and within the first 2 levels of Phase III. The off- street parking spaces are accessed by the ramps located on N.E. 17th Terrace in each of the respective buildings. Phase II contains 667 spaces, and Phase III contains 96 spaces for a total of 763 parking spaces. The off-street loading facilities are accessed via the existing alleyway between the two properties. Additional access to the loading areas for Phase III can be accessed by a service road on the north side of the property. (5) Recreational facilities locations; Recreational facilities for Phase II are located on a deck, which is on the top level of the Tower's pedestal. Phase III will also contain open space and recreational facilities including a swimming pool on the roof. The facilities are shown under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (6) Screens and buffers; Landscaping and buffer areas are indicated on the Landscape1, under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. 6 j_ 199 SvibMWed into the public recce in connection with Walter Foeman Chyy Clerk (7) Refuse collections areas; Waste collection will be provided by a containerized recycling compactor system located in the service area areas of both buildings. These facilities -are shown on the Ground Floor Plans under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (8) Access to utilities and points of utility hookups. Access and connections to site utilities are discussed in the Site Utility Study located under Tab 3 of the Supporting Documents (e) Tabulations of total gross acreage in the project and the percentages thereof proposed to be devoted to the permitted uses and ground coverage. Phase II 73,552 Phase III 47,921 Total 121,473 2.8 gross square feet gross square feet gross lot area gross acres (1) The various permitted uses. FAR Proposed — Residential 4.6 ( 560,963 s.f.) Total 5.5 ( 671,335 s.f.) FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS Phase II - Residential Non -Residential Total Phase III - Residential Non -Residential Total 560,963 s.f. 18,112 s.f. 579,075 s.f. Subrntwro¢i into the pudic r® in connection with 0 s.f, 1twn2-- one2 - 92,260 s.f. Walter Foefftao 92,260 s.f. City Clerk 01- 199 M (2) Ground coverage by structures. BUILDING FOOTPRINT Phase III Total Building Footprint (Ground Coverage) Tabulation showing: (1) (2) 36,800 s.f. (50%) 19.235 s.f. (40%) 56,035 s.f. (46%) The derivation of numbers of off street parking and off street loading spaces shown in (d) above: There are 763 off street parking spaces provided as required by Code. The off-street loading areas are shown on the ground Floor Plans under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. The six (6) loading bays required under the Code are provided according to the plans. Four (4) bays are full size bays of 12'X 35' with a minimum clearance of fifteen (15) feet, and 2 of the bays will be reduced size. A Class II waiver is required for the size reduction. Total project density in dwelling units per acre. The Project contains 635 residential rental apartments and 1.61 net acres. 500 units per acre are allowed under the Code. The residential project density per acre is: 635 Units _ 1.61 Net Acres = 394 dwelling units per acre. The existing land use Covenant permits 678 dwelling units. There are only 635 dwelling units in the project. Submitied into the public MCO :n connection xlth item �- on =�J WabrFoeawn CRY Clerk 01- 199 (g) If common facilities (such as recreation areas of structures, private streets, common open space, etc.) are to be provided for the development, statements as to how such common facilities are to be provided and permanently maintained. The owner will maintain all common facilities provided for the Residential Tower and the Institutional building. (h) Storm drainage and sanitary sewerage plans. Storm drainage, water distribution, wastewater and solid waste generation provisions are discussed in the Site Utility Study located under Tab 3 of the Supporting Documents. (i) Architectural definitions for buildings in the development; exact number of dwelling units, size, and types, together with typical floor plans of each type. Within Phase I, details pertaining to the number of dwelling units, sizes and types, together with typical floor plans are included under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. The Retail Areas are shown under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. The development will include 635 residential units and 13,200 square feet of Restaurant/Retail Uses. Typical floor plans for the residential floors are included on sheets A-7 through A-9, under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. The retail areas are shown on sheet A-2 under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. Details pertaining to Phase III are also included under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (j) Plans for signs, if any. A building identification sign is located in the landscaped area at the entry Porte cochere, on N.E. 17h Terrace and North Bayshore Drive. Retail/ Restaurant name signs will be located on the storefronts. All signs will be sized and styled in compliance with the required regulations. A separate building identification sign for Phase III is located at the front of the Building on N.E. 4`h Avenue. 9 Subrn+iria wnto gc pulrtic record 'n conneOcn writ4j _ ,!e„ on water Foemn City Clerk (k) Landscaping plan, including types, sizes and locations of vegetation and decorative shrubbery, and showing provisions for irrigation and future maintenance. The Landscaping Plan located on Sheet L -1 through L-2 under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents, specify the plant types, sizes and locations, as well as indications that all planted areas will be fully irrigated and maintained by the Owner. (1) Plans for recreation facilities, if any, including location and general description of buildings for such use. Phase II has a recreational deck where the recreational facilities are provided. The deck will have an Olympic type swimming pool, (3) whirlpool spas, a fitness center with exercise room, lockers and sanitary facilities. Outdoor recreation deck areas for lounging and sunning, a multi-purpose meeting/ party rooms, Bar -B -Q area, and refreshment Bar are also located on the recreation deck. A business center will be located on the recreation deck level which will not be open to the public. It will contain meeting/conference rooms, office equipment such as computers, printers, fax machine and copy machine. Secretarial and notary service will be available. (m) Such additional data, maps, plans, or statements as may be required for the particular use or activity involved. The Drawings submitted with this Application are located under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (n) Such additional data as the applicant may believe is pertinent to the proper consideration of the site and development plan. Elevations and sections depicting the architectural character of the Tower are included under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. A computer generated rendering of the project is also included under Tab 6. 0-1- 199 Subcftod into the public io lrd� dem �,connecWn kith on 1�lelter` C#Y Cierk Sub' t€Od into the public r® in cOnnoction with onT2NL Walter Fon 2. Section 1702.2.1 General Report. CRY Clerk (1) Property ownership or ownership's and beneficial interest within the boundaries of the area proposed for Major Use Special Permit. Statement of Ownership and beneficial interest within the boundaries of the area proposed for Major Use Special Permit are provided in Article LB & C. (2) The nature of the unified interest or control. The nature of unified interest or control is indicated in Article 1. (3) Survey of the proposed area showing property lines and ownership. A copy of the survey of the Property is included under Tab 5 of the Supporting Documents. (4) Map of existing features, including streets, alleys, easements, utilities lines, existing land use, general topography, and physical features. The existing site features and utility lines are shown on the survey of Property located under Tab 5 and the Site Utility Study located under Tab 3 of the Supporting Documents. The following exhibits are also included with the Major Use Special Permit Application: (a) Sheet LP -1: Map of the surrounding street system indicating the project location. (b) Sheet LP -2: Aerial photograph of the surrounding area indicating the project site. (5) Materials to demonstrate the relationship of the elements listed in (4) proceeding to surrounding area characteristics. The Drawings Submitted with this Application are located under Tab 6 ii 01— 199 BEAUCHAMP CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. GENERAL CONTRACTORS • 247 MINORCA AVENUE, CORAL GABLES, FL 33134-4405 305-445-0819 • FAX 305-447-0941 JAMES B.D. BEAUCHAMP, Chief Executive Officer DONALD L. CRISSEY, President DEAN A. THOMAS, Executive Vice President BURNETT G. FIRSTENBURGER, vice rrUc CHAMP CONSTRUCTION COMPANY MARIBEL HART, Treasurer EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY AND SUbfMtted into the public recoa in caor> ne n with AFFIRMATIVE ACTION POLICY Ian�L WaAer Foeman A. STATEMENT OF POLICY City Clerk In order to provide equal employment opportunities to all qualified persons without regard to race, color, religion, sex, national origin, or disability, this Company agrees to do the following: (1) recruit, hire, train, and promote persons in all job titles, without regard to race, color, religion, sex, national origin, or disability; (2) base decisions on employment so as to further the principle of equal employment opportunity; (3) ensure that promotion decisions are in accord with principles of equal employment opportunity by imposing only valid requirements for promotional opportunities; and (4) ensure that all personnel actions, including, but not limited to, compensation, benefits, transfers, lay-offs, return from lay-offs, company sponsored training, education, tuition assistance, social and recreational programs, will be administered without regard to race, color, religion, sex, national origin, or disability. In accordance with County Ordinance 82035, Amending Section 2-10.4(5)(d) of the Dade County Code, Beauchamp Construction Company affirms its commitment to the submittal of an affirmative action plan for the purpose of maintaining equal employment and promotional opportunity with a particular emphasis on the Black workforce population and the utilization of Black professional firms, consultants, and/or suppliers. B. RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE PROGRAM Donald L. Crissey, President, will personally oversee the program and will appoint Maribel Hart as the Equal Employment Opportunity Officer/Affirmative Action Officer (hereinafter referred to as the EEO/AA Officer) to carry out the program. The EEO/AA Officer is hereby given full authority to carry out the program and is given the responsibility and authority to: 1. Develop policy statements and internal and external communication procedures. 2. Assist line management in collecting and analyzing employment data, identifying problem areas, setting goals and timetables, and developing IrN 1 C. programs to achieve goals. Such programs shall include specific remedies to eliminate any discriminatory practices discovered in the employment system. 3. Design, implement and monitor internal audit and reporting systems to measure program effectiveness and to determine where further action is needed and, if necessary, to assure that such action is taken. 4. Report, at least quarterly, to Mr. Crissey on the progress of each unit in relation to company goals. 5. Serve as liaison between the Company, government regulatory agencies, minority and women's organizations and other community groups. 6. Assure that current legal information affecting affirmative action is disseminated to responsible officials. Submitted into the public DISSEMINATION POLICY record in connecton with it.. on sZ� 1. Internal Dissemination of Policy Walter Foeman City Clerk In order to disseminate the EEO/AA Policy to all members of the Company staff who are authorized to hire, supervise, promote and discharge employees, or who recommend such action, the Company will take the following steps: (a) Include the policy in the Company's policy manual. (b) Publicize the policy in Company newspapers, magazines, annual reports and other available media devices. (c) Conduct special meetings with executive, management, and supervisory personnel to explain the intent of the policy and individual responsibility for effective implementation, making clear the chief executive officer's attitude with respect to affirmative action obligations. (d) Schedule special meetings with all other employees to discuss policy and explain individual employee responsibilities. (e) Discuss the policy thoroughly in both employee orientation and management training programs. (f) Meet with union officials as appropriate to inform them of the policy, and to request their cooperation. 01- 1f)9 2 (g) Include non-discrimination clauses in any union agreements, and review all contractual provisions to ensure they are non- discriminatory. (h) Publish articles in Company publications covering EEO/AA programs, progress reports, promotions, etc., for minority and female employees. (1) Post policy on the company bulletin boards. (j) Ensure that employees featured in product or consumer advertising, employee handbooks or similar publications include both minority and non -minority men and women. (k) Inform employees of the existence of the Company's affirmative action policy, and enable employees to avail themselves of its benefits. (1) Maintain a working environment free of harassment, intimidation, and coercion at all sites and in all facilities at which Beauchamp Construction Company employees are assigned to work. Beauchamp Construction Company shall specifically ensure that all foremen, superintendents, and other onsite supervisory personnel are aware of and carry out Beauchamp Construction Company's obligation to maintain such a working environment with specific attention to minorities or women working at such sites or in such facilities. 2. EXTERNAL DISSEMINATION OF POLICY In order to make the Company's Equal Employment Opportunity Policy/Affirmative Action Policy known to all employees, prospective employees, and potential sources of employees, such as schools, employment agencies, labor unions, and college placement offices, the Company will take the following action: (a) Inform all recruitment sources verbally and in writing of the Company policy, stipulating that these sources actively recruit and refer minorities and women for all positions listed. (b) Incorporate the equal opportunity clause in all purchase orders, leases, and contracts covered by Executive Order 11246, as amended, and its implementing regjq,, pubdiC record in connechon with "" l� &Wr Foarrm 3 Chy Clerk (c) Notify minority and women's organizations, community agencies, community leaders, secondary schools and colleges of the Company policy, preferably in writing. (d) Inform prospective employees of the existence of the Company's affirmative action policy, and enable such prospective employees to avail themselves of its benefits. (e) Ensure that employees pictured in consumer or help wanted advertising include both minority and non -minority men and women. (f) Send written notification of subcontractors, vendors, and appropriate action on their part. the Company policies to all suppliers with requests for UTILIZATION OF MINORITIES AND FEMALES The Company will make a good faith effort to meet the designed goals set forth by the Office of Federal Contract Compliance programs for utilizing minorities and females in various crafts on all construction jobs during the time this contractor has a federally assisted or direct federal construction contract. E. RECRUITMENT/ADVERTISING 1. When advertising for employees, the Company will include in all advertisements for employees the notation: "an Equal Opportunity Employer." The Company will insert advertisements in newspapers or other publications having a large circulation among minority and female groups in the area from which the company's workforce would normally be derived. 2. The Company will conduct systematic and direct recruitment through public and private employee referral sources likely to yield qualified minority group applicants, including, but not limited to, state employment agencies, schools, colleges, and minority group organizations. To meet these requirements, the Company will, through the EEO/AA Officer, identify sources of potential minority and female group employees and establish procedures whereby applicants may be referred to the Company for employment consideration. 3. The Company will encourage its present employees to refer minority and female group applicants for employment by posting appropriate notices or bulletins in areas accessible to all such errt i r x mw qnj, PuLfic Word In connection with 401— 1.19 W Foeman City Clerk F. PERSONNEL ACTIONS Wages, working conditions, and employee benefits shall be established and administered, and personnel action of every type, including hiring, upgrading, promotion, transfer, demotion, lay-off, and termination will be taken without regard to race, color, religion, sex, national origin or disability. The following procedures will be followed: 1. Periodic inspections of project sites will be conducted to ensure that working conditions and employee facilities do not allow discriminatory treatment of project site personnel. 2. The spread of wages paid within each classification will be periodically evaluated to determine any evidence of discriminatory wage practices. 3. The Company will periodically review selected personnel actions in depth to determine whether there is evidence of discrimination. Where evidence is found, the company will promptly take corrective action. If the review indicates that the discrimination may extend beyond the actions reviewed, such corrective action shall include all affected persons. 4. The Company will investigate all complaints of alleged discrimination in connection with its obligations under its contract, will attempt to resolve such complaints, and will take appropriate corrective action. If the investigation indicates that the discrimination may affect persons other than the complaint, such corrective action shall include such other persons. Upon completion of each investigation, the Company will inform the complainant of all avenues of appeal. G. TRAINING AND PROMOTION 1. - The Company will assist in locating, qualifying and increasing the skills of minority and female employees and applicants for employment. 2. Consistent with its requirements and as permissible under Federal and State regulations, the Company will make full use of training programs, such as pre -apprenticeship, apprenticeship, or on-the-job training programs, for the geographical area of contract performance. 3. To the extent possible, the Company will advise employees and applicants for employment of available training programs and entrance requirements for such programs. Sc�a►e�nitterl into the public *JJ record in connection with i`ternon 2ZaQ4 Water Foean 5 City Clerk 4. The Company will periodically review the training and promotion potential of minority and female employees and will encourage eligible employees to apply for such training and promotion. H. UTILIZATION OF LOCAL MINORITY BUSINESSES See attached schedule. 1. SUBCONTRACTING 1. When required by federal contract, the Company will use its best effort to utilize minority group subcontractors, suppliers and vendors. The Company, however, reserves the right to determine if the firm is a bona fide Minority business Enterprise. 2. The Company will use its best effort to assure subcontractor compliance with equal employment opportunity obligations. J. RECORDS AND REPORTS 1. The Company will keep such records as are necessary to determine compliance with its equal employment opportunity obligations. The records kept by the Company will be designed to indicate: (a) The number of minority, non -minority and female group member employees in each work classification. (b) The progress and efforts being made (in cooperation with unions, if appropriate) to increase protected group employment opportunities. (c) The progress and efforts being made in locating, hiring, training, qualifying and upgrading protected group employees. (d) The progress and efforts being made in securing the services of minority group subcontractors. 2. All such records will be retained for a period of three years following completion of the contract work and shall be available at reasonable times and places for inspection by authorized representatives of the State and Federal governments. The Company reserves the right to require these representatives to show proper credentials. SubrMlted �ifwttl' thO public q in connection with ft& '? on Walter Foomm City Clerk 6 01— 199 N. POST -AWARD COMPLIANCE It is understood that the OFCCP may review our employment practices as w ell as those of any subcontractors the Company has employed during the performance of a federally assisted or direct federal contract. If the goals for the employment of minorities and females set by the OFCCP are not being met, the Company shall still be given an opportunity to demonstrate that it has made every good faith effort to meet its commitment. For the purpose of this policy statement, the term "minority" means Black, Hispanic, Asian and Pacific Islander, American Indian, and Alaskan Native. For the purpose of this policy statement, a bona fide Minority Business Enterprise is a business, firm, or corporation, which is at least fifty percent (50%) owned and operated by a minority person or persons. The purpose of the Company's commitment to specific goals for the utilization of minority and/or female employees is to meet the affirmative action obligations under the Equal Opportunity Clause of a federal or federal assisted contract. This commitment is not intended and shall not be used to discriminate against any qualified applicant or employee. O. REFUSAL TO DEAL WITH DEBARRED OR INELIGIBLE CONTRACTORS OR SUBCONTRACTORS The company agrees that it will refrain from entering into any contract or contract modifications subject to Executive Order 11246 with a contractor or subcontractor debarred from or who has not demonstrated eligibility for direct federal or federally assisted construction contracts pursuant to Executive Order 11246. P. PROCUREMENT POLICIES The company will fax out invitations to bid to the minority and female owned businesses as well as bid on minority owned projects. When purchasing supplies and materials we will look to find the company with the best quality product for the best price. Shitted into the public r19 in connection with on��-1W Walter Foonv.n Clly Clerk 7 1- 199 Q. GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE Employees are encouraged to bring matters of unfair treatment or other personal concerns to the attention of Mr. Donald L. Crissey, President. 2 V., �/,/ a � � S " President t6te Donald L. Crissey 8 �� • Peopp .- record in connection with on Walter Foeman City Cleric 01- 199 0 record In ccnn,;��Sm ift dx1r an �dJ Waftffm;an CRY Clerk, X31-- 199 BEAUCHAMP CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. GENERAL CONTRACTORS • 247 MINORCA AVENUE, CORAL GABLES, FL 33134-4405 305-445-0819 • FAX 305-447-0941 JAMES B.D. BEAUCHAMP, Chief Executive Officer DONALD L CRISSEY, President DEAN A. THOMAS, Executive Vice President BURNETT G. FIRSTENBURGER, Vice President MARIBEL HART, Treasurer PROCUREMENT POLICY It is the policy of Beauchamp Construction Company and all of its affiliates to afford equal opportunity to all vendors and suppliers of material to Beauchamp. Firms providing goods and services to Beauchamp shall not be discriminated against based on the owner's race, age, sex, religion, and status as a veteran or national origin. Beauchamp Construction Co. will... 1. Solicit bids from all qualified firms, regardless of ownership. Including the utilization of lists of qualified vendors maintained by the Department of Business Development. 2. Evaluate all bids so as to further the principles of non-discrimination and equal opportunity. 3. Insure that final purchases are in accordance with the principals of equal opportunity. 4. Insure that al procurement actions such as repeat purchases, extensions, change orders, acceptance policy, etc. will be administered without regard to race, age, sex, religion, and status as a veteran or national origin. Maribel Hart has been appointed EQUAL OPPORTUNITY OFFICER, with the responsibility for the coordination and implementation of the program with operating officials and supervisory personnel. Further, she/he is responsible for reporting to me at regular intervals regarding purchases and contracting. 1 firmly endorse and support our EQUAL OPPORTUNITY PROGRAM and have established an AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PROGRAM to ensure our continued commitment. I am confident that everyone at Beauchamp and its affiliates will provide their full support, cooperation and effort to ensure the committed successful achievement of this program. L. Donald L. Crissey President 0'ub intd Me public r600rd in cor nein with s D2azart 2 Z al o D to s r" r Fran ""OYINYM-60 V POUCY OOAoe 01— 199 cz> L STATISTICAL WORKFORCE ANALYSIS FIRM'S NAME: BEAUCHAMP CONSTRUCTION CO.. INC LOCATION: 247 MINORCA AVENUE, CORAL GABLES FL 33134 JOB CATEGORY: A. TOTAL NUMBER PER JOB CATEGORY RACIAL/ETHNIC GROUP STATUS B. TOTAL PERCENTAGE PER WHITE BLACK HISPANIC OTHER COMBINED TOTAL JOB CATEGORY M F M F M F M F W B H O PRINCIPLES * A. IN HOUSE/EEO TOTALS 4 1 4 1 AND MANAGERS B. IN HOUSE/EEO PERCENTAGE 80% 20% 80% 20% REGISTERED ** A. IN HOUSE/EEO TOTALS 6 2 6 2 PROFESSIONALS (Not Included Above) B. IN HOUSE/EEO PERCENTAGE 75% 25% 75% 25% OTHER A. IN HOUSE/EEO TOTALS PROFESSIONALS B. IN HOUSE/EEO PERCENTAGE PARA *** A. IN HOUSE/EEO TOTALS 5 3 3 5 3 3 PROFESSIONALS B. IN HOUSE/EEO PERCENTAGE 45% 27% 27% 45% 27% 27% OFFICE'**' A. IN HOUSE/EEO TOTALS 1 1 1 5 2 6 AND 163% CLERICAL B. IN HOUSE/EEO PERCENTAGE 13% 13% 13% 26% 76% OTHERS***" A. IN HOUSE/EEO TOTALS 3 13 5 3 13 5 (Define and list in the Narrative) B. IN HOUSE/EEO PERCENTAGE 14% 62% 24% 14% 62% 24% TO AL 18 17 , s s 18 1$ 17 Officer Name & Signature: VA4,1 Date: U 100% of the Total Index Figure. MA�i 6£i RA2T "Officers of the Company Su bled ed into the public Construction managers, project managers, estimators record in tonne on With Superintendents, Foremen, project engineers i1 �J�`j All office staff +-_ Wgrter Foemn Laborers, carpenters Cloy Clerk N:/Admin/Affirmative Action/Statisticl Wk Force Analysis 00 MIRAMAR CENTRE PHASE II AND III MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY Prepared for Florida East Coast Realty By: The Corradino Group 5200 NW 33rd Avenue, Suite 203 Ft. Lauderdale, Florida 33309 Subgd"ed into the public remd., in_ co secftn with RP I -- Walter l~oamn City Clerk 01— 1,9 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.................................................................................................................... ES -1 Introduction......................................................................................................................................... ES -1 Intersection Performance Summary .................................................................................................... ES -1 The Effect of the Background Traffic Growth.................................................................................... ES -2 The Effect of the Project Traffic......................................................................................................... ES -2 Conclusions......................................................................................................................................... ES -2 INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................................................ 2 TRAFFICANALYSIS METHODOLOGY.................................................................................................2 TrafficPerformance.................................................................................................................................. 2 Levelof Service Standard......................................................................................................................... 4 StudyLocations........................................................................................................................................ 4 EXISTING (2000) TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE.........................................................................................7 RecommendedImprovements................................................................................................................... 8 Summary................................................................................................................................................... 8 FUTURE (2003) TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE WITHOUT PROJECT TRIPS .......................................... 9 BackgroundTraffic Growth...................................................................................................................... 9 ApprovedProjects..................................................................................................................................... 9 Future (2003) Traffic Performance Without Project Trips.....................................................................11 Summary.................................................................................................................................................11 FUTURE (2003) TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE WITH PROJECT TRIPS................................................12 TripGeneration.......................................................................................................................................12 Trip Distribution and Assignment...........................................................................................................14 Year 2003 Traffic With Project Trips.....................................................................................................14 Traffic Performance With Project Trips.................................................................................................14 Summary................................................................................................................................................. 16 CONCLUSIONS........................................................................................................................................16 APPENDIX A: Traffic Counts APPENDIX B: Traffic Signal Data APPENDIX C: Existing (2000) Traffic Performance Calculations APPENDIX D: Calculation of Traffic Growth Rates APPENDIX E: Future (2003) Traffic Performance Calculations (Without Project Trips) APPENDIX F: Future (2003) Traffic Performance Calculations (With Project Trips) Subr"14into the public recOrCk in Bonne on virith Falter FOa- mmn Ci% Clerk Traffic Study for Miramar Centre Phases 11 and III i LIST OF FIGURES Figure1: Project Location........................................................................................................................3 Figure 2: Intersection Geometry ...............................................................................................................5 Figure 3: Existing (2000) Peak -Season Traffic Volumes.........................................................................6 Figure 4: Future (2003) Traffic Volumes Without Project Trips...........................................................10 Figure 5: Project Trip Distribution and Assignment..............................................................................13 Figure 6: Year 2003 Traffic with Project Trips...........................................................:..........................15 LIST OF TABLES Table ES -1: Traffic Performance Summary ........................................................................................... ES -1 Table ES -2: 2003 Intersection Performance Comparison....................................................................... ES -2 Table1: Study Intersections..........................................................................................................................7 Table 2: Existing (2000) Intersection Performance..................................................................................... 7 Table 3: Proposed Traffic Signal Phasing Changes......................................................................................8 Table 4: Future (2003) Intersection Performance.......................................................................................11 Table 5: Project Trip Generation................................................................................................................12 Table 6: Future (2003) Intersection Performance With Project Trips........................................................14 Table 7: 2003 Intersection Performance Comparison.................................................................................16 Table C-1: Traffic Volume Projections.................................................................................................... C-1 Sub"fted Into Ih� lau lla in connef"jit,-e IkN1 �_ on Ql2z/4I Wai¢Or FOC4 an Chy Clerk Traffic Study for Miramar Centre Phases 11 and 111 01— 19+.i ii October 2000 G.Q767\wor4Atraffc report.DOC EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction The purpose of this study is to identify the traffic impacts associated with the following facilities (Project) to be developed in downtown Miami: . Miramar Phase II A high-rise apartment building with: a 635 apartment units Intersection Performance Future (2003) Existing (2000) Without Project With Project LOS*. V/C** LOS* V/C** LOS* V/C** • 8,500 sq.ft quality restaurant B+ • 3,000 sq.ft indoor/outdoor caf6 B+ ■ 1,700 sq.ft retail Miramar Phase III92,300 sq.ft of institutional use Biscayne Blvd. @ NE 14'h St. (Community College) Traffic performance in this study is calculated for three conditions at 13 study intersections: 1. Existing (2000) 2. Future (2003) without Project traffic 3. Future (2003) with Project traffic Intersection Performance Summary The results of the calculations are summarized in Table ES -1 below. Table ES -1: Intersection Performance Summary Intersection Intersection Performance Future (2003) Existing (2000) Without Project With Project LOS*. V/C** LOS* V/C** LOS* V/C** Biscayne Blvd. @ NE 13th St. B+ 0.58 B+ 0.60 B+ 0.62 Biscayne Blvd. @ NE 14'h St. D+/C+ 0.8510.79 C 0.82 C 0.84 Biscayne Blvd. @ NE 15` St. F/D+ 0.97/0.84 D+ 0.87 D+ 0.89 Biscayne Blvd. @ NE 17'b St. C+ 0.84 C+ 0.87 C 0.91 Biscayne Blvd. @ NE If Ter. C 0.81 D+ 0.83 D+ 0.86 Biscayne Blvd. @ NE 19` St. A 0.74 A 0.76 D+ 0.97 N. Ba shore Dr. @ NE 13` St. B+ 0.35 B+ 0.37 B+ 0.38 N. Ba shore Dr. @ NE 14` St. B+ 0.24 B+ 0.25 B+ 0.26 N. Ba shore Dr. @ NE 15` St. C+ 0.45 C+ 0.46 C+ 0.47 N. Bayshore Dr. @ NE 17` Ter.*** B N/A B N/A C N/A NE 17'h Ter. @ NE 4` Ave.*** A " A N/A C " NE 18 1h St. @ NE 4 1h Ave. W*** B B N/A C " NE 18 1h St. @ NE 4` Ave. E*** A A N/A A " *Level of Service (Note: D+/C+ s LOS before/after optimization) **Volume Over Capacity Ratio (Note: 0.85/0.79 — V/C before/after optimization) ***Unsignalized Intersection; LOS shown for the worst movement; V/C calculation is not applicable Traffic Study for Miramar Centre Phases 11 and 111 October 2000 Submitted into the public reco4 in conneodon with on c21- I WaWr i=on Glrj Clerk 0-4- 199 ES -1 The Effect of the Background Traffic Growth The study intersections will experience minor worsening of performance caused by the traffic volume growth through year 2003 (without Project traffic). The only intersection that will undergo a change in level of service is Biscayne Boulevard at NE 17th Terrace, which currently (2000) operates at LOS C and is expected to operate at LOS D+ in 2003 without the Project traffic. Additionally, the following movements are expected to present low performance in 2003: a) Biscayne Boulevard at NE 15`h Street: The eastbound and westbound movements will operate at LOS E+. b) Biscayne Boulevard at NE If Terrace: The southbound left -turn movement and the northbound through and right -turn movements are expected to operate at LOS E+. The Effect of the Project Traffic Overall, the addition of Project traffic will contribute to minor changes in traffic performance, with the exceptions listed below. TableES-2: 2003 Intersection Performance Comparison Intersection Year 2003 Levels of Service Without Project Traffic With Project Traffic Biscayne Blvd. @ NE 17` St. C+ C Biscayne Blvd. @ NE 19` St. A D+ N. Ba shore Dr. @ 17` Ter. B C NE 17` Ter. @ NE&h Ave. A C NE 18` St @ NE 4` Ave. W B C After Project trips are considered, all study intersections will operate at LOS D or better. It should be noted, however, that an analysis of the individual movements indicates the following: a) Biscayne Boulevard at NE 15`h Street: The northbound through/right-turn movement is expected to operate at LOS E+; additionally, the westbound through/right and eastbound movements will operate at LOS E. b) Biscayne Boulevard at NE 17`h Terrace: The southbound and westbound left -turn movements will operate at LOS E+; the northbound through/right movement is expected to operate at LOS E. c) Biscayne Boulevard at NE 19`h Street: The southbound left -turn and the westbound right -turn movements are expected to operate at LOS E. All of the above are within the level standard of LOS E as described in the Downtown Miami DRI. Conclusions Although lower performance levels were observed compared to the other scenarios, Project trips do not contribute to violate the minimum performance level (LOS E) at the study intersections. Traffic Study for Miramar Centre Phases 11 and III October 2000 Subatifted into the public record in conne0on witl, itm on 0-1-6--5k la ) Wafter Ff�,oman 19 ES -2 Traffic signal phasing modifications to obtain acceptable performance at the intersections are the only recommended improvements at the study intersections. It should be noted that the modifications are recommended at two locations to mitigate existing operations. The only improvement recommended as a result of the Project trips is a traffic signal phasing optimization on Biscayne Boulevard at NW 196' Street. Stab"tted into the public recofd In connection with ifawn 2--,-2 — on Walter Foy-mman City Clerk Traffic Study for Miramar Centre Phases II and III ES -3 October 2000 01— -[ 9 9 INTRODUCTION The purpose of this study is to identify the traffic impacts associated with the following facilities (Project) to be developed in downtown Miami: Miramar Phase II A high-rise apartment building with: ■ 635 apartment units ■ 8,500 sq.ft quality restaurant ■ 3,000 sq.ft indoor/outdoor caf6 • 1,700 sq.ft retail Miramar Phase III 92,300 sq.ft of institutional use (Communit College) Both Phases are located in a property roughly delimited by NE 4`h Avenue, NE 17`h Terrace and N. Bayshore Drive. The property is located just east of Biscayne Boulevard, as illustrated on Figure 1. This report will be included in the Project's Major Use Special Permit (MUSP) application. Presented first in the report is an analysis of the existing traffic conditions in the study area. This is followed by an analysis of future traffic conditions in 2003. Future conditions are analyzed separately with and without Project traffic. The purpose of the separate analyses is to determine, if any, specific impacts to the transportation network caused by the Project trips. A study summary is presented at the end of the report. TRAFFIC ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY Traffic Performance Traffic studies submitted under the MUSP regulations should conform to the Downtown Miami DRI (Development of Regional Impacts) guidelines. The DRI recommends that afternoon peak -hour traffic performance analyses be completed. The DRI also indicates that the following downtown Miami facilities, among others, are considered either physically or aesthetically constrained. As such, the widening of those facilities is not feasible: ■ Interstate 95 (I-95) ■ Interstate 395 (I-395) ■ Dolphin Expressway (S.R. 836) ■ Biscayne Boulevard (U.S. 1) ■ Brickell Avenue (U.S. 1) ■ U.S. 441 (S.R. 7) SW04tted into the public re(*rd in cor nOct on with V,f r FCP.man Of the above, Biscayne Boulevard is of special interest because of its close location to the Project site. Traffic performance analyses are generally conducted using the level of service (LOS) concept. Levels of service indicate traffic performance in a range from LOS A (free flow with negligible delays) to LOS F (heavily congested with long delays). Intermediate conditions are represented by LOS B, LOS C, LOS D and LOS E. Level of service is measured in terms of delays imposed on drivers at the intersection. 2 Traffic Study for Miramar Centre Phases 11 and III «. October 2000 NE 19th Ter ' k HE 19th St �� °; 9 5sx' 1 � � � t 0 NE 18th St G � 1 fi h k .y NE 17th Ter * f a NE 17th Ter N W z r . NE 17th St W z r y z NE 16th St t NE 15th Ter m o o ;a NE 15th St NE 15th St NE 14 o` r� 0 Submitted i NE 14th St record In o -c a NE 13th Ter z LEGEND t O Signalized HE 13th St110 • Unsignalized Ty 395 u Miramar Centre Phases II and III Figure Study Area/Study Int ry-ectionj 99 Another measure of the traffic performance is the Volume -to -Capacity (V/C) Ratio. As the name indicates, the V/C ratio measures how close an intersection is operating to its capacity. Traffic performance is calculated using the SIGNAL97 and the Highway Capacity Software (HCS) software. The former provides calculation for signalized intersections and the latter for stop -controlled intersections. Both use the recommended intersection performance calculation methodology contained in the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM), 1997 version. The HCM is the standard traffic -engineering reference for traffic performance calculations. Both SIGNAL97 and HCS require, among others, the following data: ■ Intersection Geometry ■ Traffic Counts ■ Traffic Signal Data Intersection Geometry: Lane configuration at the intersection was obtained during field inspections. The results are illustrated schematically on Figure 2. Traffic Counts: Turning movement counts at 13 intersections and 24-hour machine counts at three locations were obtained in September, 2000. The counts were converted to peak -season conditions to represent the highest traffic volumes during the year. The conversion to peak -season conditions is made using Florida Department of Transportation's (FDOT) peak -season conversion factors. The resulting peak -season counts are displayed on Figure 3. Raw counts are attached as Appendix A. Traffic Signal Data: Traffic signal cycle lengths and phasing were obtained from the Miami -Dade County Public Works. The Public Works' Traffic Control Center provides computerized traffic signal information to qualified users. The information is included in Appendix B. Traffic performance in this study is calculated for three conditions: 1. Existing (2000) 2. Future (2003) without Project traffic 3. Future (2003) with Project traffic Future conditions are analyzed for year 2003 when the Project is expected to be fully operational. The purpose of providing separate analyses with and without Project traffic is to estimate, if any, the specific traffic impact of Project trips on the surrounding transportation network. Level of Service Standard According to the Miami Downtown DRI, the minimum level of service acceptable in downtown Miami is LOS E. The DRI additionally specifies that up to 20% of the roadways could operate below LOS E. Study Locations Traffic performance is calculated at the 13 study intersections listed below. Ten intersections are signalized and four are stop -controlled. The location and the traffic control devices at each intersection are listed on Figure 1 shown previously and summarized in Table 1 shown next. Traffic Study for Miramar Centre Phases II and III October 2000 Submt?lttea - recOl",'a tile Public 2LIn cOM100on With Walter RK34lian Crty Clerk of - 199 4 NE 1 L NE 11th Ter a NE 17th Ter N Uj Do NE Z ♦I I L NE 17th St 1 ~* I� NE 16th St NE 15th Ter t� t� 1 o NE 15th St .I NE 15t Sub"litted into recorg in conn ftm NE 14th Ter a` on. � o� r o _ �� ~ NE 14th St zf LEGEND NE 13th Ter a O Signalized i • Unsignalized t NE 13th St �3q Sub"litted into recorg in conn ftm K on. Miramar Centre Phases II and III Figure Existing (2000) Intersection Geometry 2 01-- 199 Miramar Centre Phases 11 and III Existing (2000) Peak Season Counts 01- 199 Figure 3 Table 1: Study Intersections Location Trac Control Device Biscayne Blvd. @ NE 13` St. Traffic Signal Biscayne Blvd. @ NE 14` St. " Biscayne Blvd. @ NE 15` St. " Biscayne Blvd. @ NE ITh St. " Biscayne Blvd. @ NE 17 Ter. " Biscayne Blvd. @ NE 191St. " N. Ba shore Dr. @ NE 13'h St. " N. Ba shore Dr. @ NE 14`h St. " N. Ba shore Dr. @ NE 15 1h St. " N. Ba shore Dr. @ NE 17` Ter. Stop Signs NE 17Ter. @ NE 4P Ave. " NE 18 1h St. @ NE 4 1h Ave. W " NE 18` St. @ NE e Ave. E " EXISTING (2000) TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE Traffic performance calculations were completed for the above locations using the methodology described previously. Detailed calculation sheets are included in Appendix C, of which a summary is provided in Table 2. Table 2: Existing (2000) Intersection Performance Location Afternoon Peak Hour Performance LOS* V/C** Biscayne Blvd. @ NE 13` St. B+ 0.58 Biscayne Blvd. @ NE 14!hSt. D+/C+ 0.85/0.79 Biscayne Blvd. @ NE 15` St. F/D+ 0.97/0.84 Biscayne Blvd. @ NE 17` St. C+ 0.84 Biscayne Blvd. @ NE 17'h -(?p Ter. C 0.81 Biscayne Blvd. NE 19` St. A 0.74 N. Ba shore Dr. @ NE 13` St. B+ 0.35 N. Ba shore Dr. @ NE 14 1h St. B+ 0.24 N. Ba shore Dr. @ NE 15` St. C+ 0.45 St N. Ba shore Dr. @ NE 17'hTer.*** B N/A NE 17` Ter. @ NE 4` Ave.*** A " NE 18 1h St. @ NE 4`h Ave. W*** B " NE 18` St. @ NE 4`h Ave. E*** A " *Level of Service (Note: D+/C+ = LOS before/after optimization) **Volume Over Capacity Ratio (Note: 0.85/0.79 = V/C before/after optimization) ***Unsignalized Intersection; LOS shown for the worst movement 1 '00*nectkon with tt2-a? on Wailer Fin CitY Cterk Table 2 indicates that, overall, the intersections present acceptable performances of LOS D or better. The only exception is the intersection of Biscayne Boulevard at NE 15`h Street. It should be noted, however, that the performances shown are for the entire intersection. Individual movements may have worse Traffic Study for Miramar Centre Phases 11 and 111 01— 199 7 October 2000 performances. This is the case of Biscayne Boulevard at NE 14`h Street. Although the intersection currently operates at LOS D+, the southbound left -tum movement operates at LOS F and the northbound through and right -tum movements operate at LOS E. Recommended Improvements In order to improve operations at the two intersections mentioned previously, changes in signal operation are recommended as summarized next. Table 3: Proposed Traffic Signal Phasing Changes Intersection Existing Phasing Proposed Phasing Biscayne Blvd. @ a) North-South (76 sec) a) North-South left (10 sec) NE 14`h St. b) East-West (39 sec) b) North-South (81 sec) c) East-West (24 sec) Biscayne Blvd. @ a) North-South left (10 sec) a) Southbound (8 sec) NE 151h St. b) North-South (66 sec) b) North-South (77 sec) c) Westbound (10 sec) c) East-West (30 sec) d) East-West (29 sec) It should be noted that the cycle lengths are kept the same in all cases. This is a necessary consideration to maintain the traffic signal progression along Biscayne Boulevard. With the above changes, both intersections would operate today at LOS D or better. Individual movements at all intersections are also LOS D or better. The performance calculations with the proposed changes are also included in Appendix C. Summary Traffic signal phasing changes are recommended at the intersections of Biscayne Boulevard at NE 14`h and NE 15th Streets. With the recommended changes, all intersections and all individual movements within the intersections are expected to operate at LOS D or better. Sub"►itted into the public record In connection with Item .,Ezn� on Wafter Foomen City Clerk Traffic Study for Miramar Centre Phases 11 and 111 01— 199 8 October 2000 FUTURE (2003) TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE WITHOUT PROJECT TRIPS Year 2003 traffic volumes at the study intersections are calculated. Traffic volumes in 2003 have three components: ■ Background Traffic ■ Approved Projects Not Yet Built • Miramar Trips The first two components are used to determine year 2003 traffic without Project trips and are described next. Miramar trips are described separately under the heading "Future (2003) Traffic Performance With Project Trips." Background Traffic Growth Analyses of the year 2003 conditions require the estimation of the background traffic growth. Past experience indicates that the statistical tool called linear regression is in many cases a good estimator of future traffic volumes. A first attempt at using the linear regression analyses is described next. The FDOT routinely counts traffic at select locations. At those locations, historic traffic counts are available. The latest available information is contained in the 1999 Traffic Information compact disk. In particular, there are four count stations located near the Project site: 1. Biscayne Boulevard north of NE I Vh Street 2. Biscayne Boulevard south of NE 13`h Street 3. Biscayne Boulevard north of NE 13'h Street 4. Biscayne Boulevard north of NE 19`h Street Historic data were compiled at those locations from 1994 to 1999. In 1992 and 1993, travel behavior changed substantially as a result of the damages caused by Hurricane Andrew. Therefore, counts prior to, and including 1994 were not used. The results of the linear regression analyses are included in Appendix C. The analyses indicate that the R -square, with one exception, is well below 1.0. The R -square is one of the parameters that indicate the goodness of fit between actual data and the proposed linear curve. An R -square of 1.0 indicates a perfect fit and an R -square of 0.0 indicates no fit. In view of the above, the linear regression results were discarded and a compounded one -percent growth per year was assumed. Approved Projects Besides traffic growth, future traffic is also compounded by traffic generated by other developments. In consultation with the Planning Department of the City of Miami, it was determined that the City of Miami Performing Arts Center is the only approved project not yet built in the neighborhood of the Project to be considered. The traffic study for the Performing Arts Center was consulted and the traffic generated by the Center was added to the year 2003 background traffic. Traffic volumes including background traffic calculations are included in Appendix D. Traffic Study for Miramar Centre Phases 11 and III October 2000 and approved projects are shown on Z. -J-1 Ueo into them pttbiic recd in connection with -� on I Walter Foefr an Chy Cleric Figure 4. Detailed NE 19th Ter S2 +-80 *-20 41�� f-2 " 4-89 .41 42 21 --40-� NE 19th St 32� �� 21 e a +-0 f-23 7 t 6; 81 , 24 { � t a 19 --p. F sr�f NE 18th St 141 NE 17th Ter 21 sM f-72 P NE 17th Ter 208 130 W Z 1 6-4 17 302 5 tN 4� 453 e ego 4-2 NE 17th St r Z 21 29� NE 16th StCD ' m NE 15th TerM o S m 4-50«I' 37 313 -4-276 85 NE 15th St .J i 2 NE 15t 19 65� 267 1 134 r 26 � � NE 14th Ter o` o� r o 23 19 1 45 48 L NE 14th St tet;o in C 31�89 21 I�rn ,::..; „ 51—► ���, --► ao�E o 42--+S 52 o N NE 13th Ter R m CDW LEGEND 4-0 v z O Signalized N 362 r 4-150 364 `-995 ' d I • Unsignalized 4 V tam Miramar Centre Phases II and III Future (2003) Peak Season Traffic Without Project 91- 199 Figure 4 Future (2003) Traffic Performance Without Project Trips The calculation of future traffic performance without the Project (background traffic) was completed using the geometry described on Figure 3 and the traffic volumes shown on Figure 4. Detailed reports of the analyses are included in Appendix D, of which a summary is provided in Table 4. Table 4: Future (2003) Intersection Performance Without Project Trips Location Afternoon Peak Hour Performance LOS* V/C** Biscayne Blvd. @ NE 13` St. B+ 0.60 Biscayne Blvd. @ NE 14`h St. C 0.82 Biscayne Blvd. @ NE 15 1h St. D+ 0.84 Biscayne Blvd. @ NE 17 1h St. C+ 0.87 Biscayne Blvd. @ NE 17 1h Ter. D+ 0.83 Biscayne Blvd. @ NE 19` St. A 0.76 N. Ba shore Dr. @ NE 13` St. B+ 0.37 N. Ba shore Dr. @ NE 14` St. B+ 0.25 N. Ba shore Dr. @ NE 15` St. C+ 0.46 N. Ba shore Dr. @ NE 17` Ter.*** B N/A NE 17Ter. @ NE 4'h Ave.*** A N/A NE 18 1h St. @ NE 4` Ave. W*** B N/A NE 18 1h St. @ NE 4!h Ave. E*** A N/A *Level of Service **Volume Over Capacity Ratio ***Unsignalized Intersection; LOS shown for the worst movement; V/C calculation is not applicable Table 4 indicates that all intersections are expected to operate at LOS D or better in 2003 before the Project is completed. Table 4 indicates the overall intersection performance. The only intersection that is expected to present a lower level of service in 2003 compared to 2000 is Biscayne Boulevard and NE 17`h Terrace. At that location, the performance is expected to change from LOS C to LOS D+. Tables 2 and 4, however, indicate performance of the intersections as a whole. A movement -by - movement comparison indicates the following: a) Biscayne Boulevard at NE 15`h Street: The eastbound and westbound movements will operate at LOS E+. b) Biscayne Boulevard at NE 17`h Terrace: The southbound left -turn movement and the northbound through and right -turn movements are expected to operate at LOS E+. Summary Background traffic growth was estimated to grow at a compounded rate of one -percent a year. Additionally, traffic from the Performance Arts Center was added to the background traffic. The resulting intersection performance will remain at LOS D or better. The only intersection that is expected to present a lower level of service in 2003 compared to 2000 is Biscayne Boulevard and NE 17`h Terrace. At that location, the performance is expected to change from LOS C to LOS D. However, a movement -by -movement analysis indicates the followin SCord lntc the public °"d in COn ecec n witt 9't 2 -on 1 11 Traffic Study for Miramar Centre Phases 11 and !II October 2000 WaWr Fpernan 01- 199 City Cie* a) Biscayne Boulevard at NE lat Street: The eastbound and westbound movements will operate at LOS E+. b) Biscayne Boulevard at NE ITh Terrace: The southbound left -turn movement and the northbound through and right turn movements are expected to operate at LOS E+. Both of the above are within the level standard of LOS E as described in the Downtown Miami DRI. FUTURE (2003) TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE WITH PROJECT TRIPS Year 2003 traffic performance with Project trips is calculated adding Project -generated traffic to the year 2003 background traffic calculated previously. This is done following the three-step process below: ■ Trip Generation: The number of trips generated at the Project site is calculated ■ Trip Distribution: The origins and destinations of the trips are estimated ■ Trip Assignment: The Project trips are added to the 2003 background traffic These three steps are explained in more detail next. Trip Generation Each of the components comprising the Project will generate trips at a different rate. Estimates are made for each facility and described next. The main source of information is the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) 1997 version of the Trip Generation manual. The results are summarized in Table 5. Table 5: Project Trip Generation Miramar Intensity ITE LU Code* PM Pk Hr PM Pk Hr Trips Building/Land Use Trip Rate** 222 212 Phase II/Apartments 635 units (High -Rise Apt.) T = 0.315(X)+12.3 (61% in/39% out) 831 64 Phase II/Restaurant 8,500 s .ft (Quality Restaurant) T=7.49(X/1000) (67% in/33% out) 832 33 Phase II/Cafe 3,000 s .ft (High -Turnover Restaurant) T = 10.86(X/1000) (60% in/40% out) 852 59 Phase II/Retail 1,700 s .ft (Convenience Market) T=34.57(X/1000) (49% in/5I% out) Phase III/Institutional 540 164 (Communis College) 99,000 s .ft (Jr./Comm.Colle e) T = 1.66(X/1000) (46% in/54%out) 532 Total (296 in/236 out) *Institute of Transportation Engineer's 1997 Trip Generation Manual **For the peak hour of the adjacent street As shown in Table 5, the Project is expected to generate approximately 533 trips during the afternoon peak hour of a typical weekday. Of these, 296 trips apt r thh Project and 236 trips leave during the peak hour. .aali�« a}8 . "sttlia at' e PU lic retard in onnet<tk)n with ilom )2 on ,_IZ�A 1 Wetter Foemarl 12 Traffic Study for Miramar Centre Phases H and III Dty Cle(k October 2000 ._ Site Code :BB1114S00 N -S Street:BISCAINB BLVD. B -N Street:NB 14tH STRBBT Location :MIAMI Study Name: BB14S00 Site Code : 00000000 Start Date: 09107100 Page : 2 CARS,TRDCIS ;BISCAYRS BLVD. ,n 14TH STREET ;BISCAINB BLVD. ;NB 14TH STRBBT ;From North ;From Bast ;From South ;Fro& hest Start ; 11 ;Intel. Time Left Thru Right PBDS; Left Thru Right PBDS' Left Thru Right ?IDS! Left Thru Right PBDS; Total CARS TRUCKS im 252 56 117 93 93 0 Inbound Outbound 91 Total 134 43 BISCAYNE BLVD. 79 2012 128 86 0 24 1 4080 ==== ===== ===== 93 79 2036 129 ===== 4259 Inbound A44 Outbound 4259 Total 6503 321 252 573 Inbound 4393 Outbound 2258 Total 6651 94 115 4043' 2036 2 37 128 117 4080 2258 BISCAYNE BLVD. 72 86 32 24 56 Inbound 270 Outbound 458 54 Total 728 74 128 195 134 458 129 NE 14TH STREET 99 0 96 1 195 1 ; North Strb"Ited :tato the publio recordLin on m O�' WeMr Foeman y City Clerk 92 94 2 BISCAYNE BLVD. 79 2012 128 86 0 24 1 4080 ==== ===== ===== 93 79 2036 129 ===== 4259 Inbound A44 Outbound 4259 Total 6503 321 252 573 Inbound 4393 Outbound 2258 Total 6651 94 115 4043' 2036 2 37 128 117 4080 2258 BISCAYNE BLVD. 72 86 32 24 56 Inbound 270 Outbound 458 54 Total 728 74 128 195 134 458 129 NE 14TH STREET 99 0 96 1 195 1 ; North Strb"Ited :tato the publio recordLin on m O�' WeMr Foeman y City Clerk Site Code 3BXB14S00 X -S Street:BISCIIXB BLVD. B -W Street:XB 14TH STREET Location :MIIMI CIRS,TRDCIS Study late: BB14300 Site Code : 00000000 Start Date: 09/07/00 Page : 1 ;BISCATXB BLVD. ;XB 14TH STREET ;BISCAIXB BLVD. ;fB 14TH STREET ;Froi forth ;Froi Bast ;?rot South ;Frog West Start ; ; ; ;Intal. Tine ' Left Thru Right PBDS; Left Thru Right PBDS' Left Thru Right PBDS; Left Thru Right PBDS; Total _ 09/07/00 1. 16:00; 20 205 14 0; 11 11 10 0; 17 450 27 0; 17 15 11 0; 808 16:15; 14 240 7 0; 14 3 11 0; 20 471 16 0; 23 16 10 0; 845 16:30; 16 258 9 0; 10 9 5 0; 10 503 30 0; 9 26 26 0; 921 16.45' 23 250 11 0; 11 7 7 0; 20 521 17 1; 14 13 _ 10 0;_406 Hour', 73 953 41 0; 57 30 33 0; 67 1945 90 1; 63 70 57 0; 3480 17:00; 11 293 15 0; 15 1 1 0; 5 580 18 0; 5 9 9 0; 962 17:15; 13 261 it 0; 5 1 8 0; 7 576 14 0; 1 17 13 0; 927 17:30; 17 274 5 0; 10 9 10 0; 21 552 18 0; 9 9 7 0; 941 17.45; 14 248 7 0' 10 2 5 0; 15 420 16 0; 15 10 8 _0, 770 Hour; 55 1076 38 0; 40 13 24 0; 48 2128 66 0; 30 45 37 0; 3600 18:00; 0 1 0 0; 7 1 5 0; 2 2 7 0; 0 5 0 0; 30 18:15; 0 1 0 0; 6 1 3 0; 0 0 9 0; 0 3 0 0; 23 18:30; 0 0 0 0; 3 2 5 0; 0 0 7 0; 0 1 0 0; 18 1845; 0 2 0 0; 5 3 7 0; 0 0 5 0; 0 3 0 0; 15 Hour; 0 4 0 0; 21 7 20 0; 2 2 28 0; 0 12 0 0; 96 19:00; 0 1 0 0; 5 2 1 0; 0 0 2 0; 0 1 0 0; 12 19:15; 0 1 0 0; 2 1 2 0; 0 2 2 0; 0 3 0 0; 13 19:30; 1 0 0 0; 2 1 1 0; 0 1 2 0; 0 1 0 0; 9 19.45' 0 1 0 0; 1 2 5 0' 0 2 5 0; 0 2 0 0; 18 Hour; 1 3 0 0; 10 6 9 0; 0 5 11 0; 0 7 0 0; 52 Total; 129 2036 79 0; 128 56 86 0; 117 4080 195 1; 93 134 94 0; 7228 4 Apr. 5.7 90.7 3.5 -; 47.4 20.7 31.8 -; 2.6 91.8 4.4 -; 28.9 41.7 29.2 -; - 4 Int. 1.7 28.1 1.0 -; 1.7 0.7 1.1 -; 1.6 56.4 2.6 -; 1.2 1.8 1.3 -; - Suit nAtted into the publir inn anc24— Wafter F oeman City Clerk 91- 199 Site Code 381914500 Study Name: BB14S00 N -S Street:BISCAYNR BLVD. Site Code : 00000000 R -W Street:RR 14TH STREET Start Date: 09107/00 Location :MIAMI Page : 1 CARS,TRDCAS :BISCAYNE BLVD. ;NE 14TH STREET :BISCAYNE BLVD. ;NB 14TH STREET ;From North ;From East ',From South ;From Kest Start ; 11 ',Iatvl. Time ; Left Thru Right PEDS' Left Thru Right PEDS' Left Thru Right ?RDS' Left Thru Right PRDS' Total Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 16:00 on 09/07/00 to 19:45 on 09/07/00 Time 16:45 ; 16:45 ; 16:45 ; 16:45 ; Vol. 64 1078 42 0; 42 18 26 0; 53 2229 67 1; 29 48 39 0; Pct. 5.4 91.0 3.5 0.0; 48.8 20.9 30.2 0.0; 2.2 94.8 2.8 4.2; 25.0 41.3 33.6 0.0 Total 1184 86 2350 116 ; High 17:00 17:30 17:00 16:45 ; Vol. 11 293 15 0; 10 9 10 0; 5 580 18 0; 14 13 10 0 Total 319 29 603 37 ; PHF 0.927 0.741 0.974 ; 0.783 CARS TRUCKS NE 14TH STREET 42 113 18 53 29 29 0 BISCAYNE BLVD. 42 1074 64 26 0 4 0 2229 ==== ===== ===== 29 42 1078 64 ===== 2284 Inbound 1t84 Outbound 2284 Total 3468 Inbound 116 Outbound 113 42 Total 229 48 6 38 39 1 Inbound 2350 Outbound 1159 Total 3509 39 53 2220 1078 0 9 42 ===== ===== 53 2229 1159 BISCAYNE BLVD. 21 26 12 6 18 Inbound 86 Outbound 179 20 Total 265 22 42 67 48 179 64 NE 14TH STREET 41 0 26 1 67 1 ; North SubrAtte.d into the Rubble rem in cOnnecWn with {ice 2-L �/ ,�li! 199 Wafter Foomart City Gterk Site Code :BBI5PMO0 N -S Street:BISCAYNE BLVD E -W Street:19 15TH STREET Location :MIAMI CARS,TRDCSS Study male: BB1500 Site Code : 00000000 Start Date: 09/12100 Page : 2 ,BISCAYNE BLVD ;NORTHEAST 1511 STREET ;BISCAYNE BLVD ;NORTHEAST 1511 STREET ;From North 'Froi East ;Frog South ,Frog West Start ; PEDS; PEDS; PEDS; PSDS;Intvl. Time Left Thru Right PEDS: Left Thru Right PEDS; Left Thru Sight PEDS, Left Thru Night PEDS; Total CARS BISCAYNE BLVD TRUCKS 8 2096 108 62 0 18 39 3895 ==== ===== ===== 44 8 2114 147 4001 Inbound 2 69 Outbound 4001 NCIRTH .AST TH STREE Total 6270 n 481 449 24 31 44 13 Inbound 343 - Outbound 481 292 Total 824 292 0 7 7 0 Inbound 4121 Outbound 2259 Total 6380 7 24 3858 2114 0 37 138 ===== ===== 24 3895 2259 BISCAYNE BLVD 27 62 449 0 449 Inbound 649 Outbound 641 138 Total 1290 0 138 202 292 641 147 NORTHEAST 15TH STREET 202 0 0 0 202 0 ; North Sub afted into fho public record � in connection with iii � on Walter Foeraaan City Clerk 91- 'x.99 Site Code :BB15PM00 N -S Street:BISCAYNE BLVD I-V Street:NE 15TH STREET Location :MIAMI CARS,TRHCNS Study Name: BB1500 Site Code : 00000000 Start Date: 09/12/00 Page : 1 :BISCAYNE BLVD ;NORTHEAST 15TH STREET :BISCAINE BLVD ;NORTHEAST 15TH STREET ;From North ;From East ;From South ;From Vest Start ; PEDS, PEDS, PEDS; PEDS;Iatvl. Time ; Left Thru Right PEDS; Left Thru Right PEDS; Left Thru Right PEDS; Left ThruRight PEDS; Total Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 16:00 on 09/12/00 to 17:45 on 09/12/00 ; Time 16:45 ; 16:45 ; 16:45 ; 16:45 Vol. 79 1130 3 0; 72 255 40 0; 13 2025 122 0; 18 124 1 0; Pct. 6.5 93.2 0.2 0.0; 19.6 69.4 10.8 0.0; 0.6 93.7 5.6 0.0; 12.5 86.7 0.6 0.0; Total 1212 367 2160 143 ; High ; 17:00 17:00 17:00 ; 17:30 Vol. ; 18 311 0 0; 15 77 9 0; 4 550 29 0; 6 33 1 0; Total 329 101 583 40 ; PHI 0.920 0.908 0.926 0.893 ; CARS TRUCKS 3 271 255 13 10 18 8 BISCAYNE BLVD 3 1118 58 40 0 12 21 2025 ===== ===== ===== 18 3 1130 79 ===== 2083 Inbound 1 12 Outbound 2083 RE T Total 3295 Inbound 143 Outbound 271 124 Total 414 124 0 1 1 0 19 40 255 0 255 Inbound 367 Outbound 325 72 Total 692 0 72 122 124 325 79 Inbound 2160 NORTHEAST 15TH STREET Outbound 1203 Total 3363 1 13 2008 122 0 1130 0 17 0 0 M 72 ===== ===== ========== / \ -- 13 2025 122 0 ; 1203 North BISCAYNE BLVD ' `y" +w$b Qi3e Public recce in CCnne0on with t .� 01- 199 *8fteJ�e Site Code :BBISPKOO N -S Street:BISCAYNE BLVD S -W Street:18 15TH STREET Location :KIAKI CARS,TRDCIS Study Nile: BB1500 Site Code : 00000000 Start Date: 09/12100 Page : 1 :BISCAYNE BLVD ;NORTHEAST 1571 STREET :BISCAYNE BLVD ;NORTHEAST 15TH STREET ;Froe North ;Fro■ East ;Frog South ;Fros West Start ; PEDS, PEDS; PEDS, PEDS;Intvl. Tise ; Left Thru Right PEDS; Left Thru Right PEDS' Left Thru Right PEDS! Left Thru Right PEDS; Total 09/12/00 1. 16:00; 10 221 0 0; 14 46 6 0; 2 472 27 0; 6 45 1 0; 850 16:15; 1S 249 2 0; 10 73 5 0; 4 465 22 0; 10 36 4 0; 895 16:30; 18 267 2 0; 15 41 7 0; 3 503 12 0; 10 48 1 0; 927 16.45; 10 282 1 0. 5 66 8 0; 4 504 31 0; 3 30 0 0; 944 Hour,' 53 1019 S 0; 44 226 26 0; 13 1944 92 0; 29 159 6 0; 3616 17:00; 18 311 0 0; 15 77 9 0; 4 550 29 0; 2 32 0 0; 1047 11:15; 28 266 0 0; 21 59 12 0; 2 442 30 0; 7 29 0 0; 896 17:30; 23 171 1 0; 31 53 11 0; 3 529 32 0; 6 33 1 0; 995 17.45; 25 247 1 01 27 34 4 0' 2 430 19 01, 0 39 0 0; 828 Hour; 94 1095 3 0; 94 223 36 0; 11 1951 110 0; 15 133 1 0; 3766 Total; 147 2114 8 0; 138 449 62 0; 24 3895 202 0; 44 292 7 0; 7382 1 Apr. 6.4 93.1 0.3 -; 21.2 69.1 9.5 -; 0.5 94.5 4.9 -; 12.8 85.1 2.0- 4 Iit. 1.9 28.6 0.1 -; 1.8 6.0 0.8 -; 0.3 52.7 2.7 -; 0.5 3.9 - -; - aubm"� Me public record In connection with 4W 2'_:—.a on. -2f lL Wer Foernan City Clerk 01- 199 Site Code :BB17PM00 N -S Street:BISChYNS BLVD B -V Street:NORTHBAST 17TH STREET Location :MIAMI CARS,TROCNS Study Name: BB17PN00 Site Code : 00000000 Start Date: 09107100 Page : 2 ;BISCAYNE BLVD ;PARKING LOT ;BISCAYNE BLVD ;NORTHEAST 17TH STREET ;From North ;From East ;From South ;From Vest Start ; PEDS; PEDS; PEDS; PEDS;Intv1. Time Thro Right PEDS' Left Thru Right ?EDS; Left Thru Right PEDS: Left Thru Right PEDS; Total CARS TRUCKS 81 161 80 BISCAYNE BLVD 81 2304 0 4 0 16 0 3310 ==== ===== ===== 47 81 2320 0 ===== 3361 Inbound 2 01 Outbound 3361 Total 5762 47 47 0 Inbound 104 Outbound 161 0 Total ' 265 0 0 57 57 0 0 4 0 0 0 Inbound 7 Outbound 0 3 Total 7 0 3 Inbound 3390 PARKING LOT Outbound 2380 Total 5770 57 80 3290 0 0 2320 0 20 0 0 3 ===== ===== ========== / \ 80 3310 0 0 ; 2380 North BISCAYNE BLVD 1 ; subglW�id irtt0 the pufaliC in connection with inn a ori Walter Fooman City Clerk 0- 199 Site Code :BB17PN00 Study Name: BB17PNOO N -S Street:BISCAYNE BLVD Site Code : 00000000 B-E Street:NORTHEIST 17TH STREET Start Date: 09/07/00 Location :NIANI Page : 1 CARS,TROCKS ;BISCDYNE BLVD ;PIRKING LOT ;BISCIYNE BLVD ;NORTHEDST 17TH STREET ;From North ;From East ;From South ;Prow hest Start ; PEDS;. PEDS; PEDS; PBDS;Iatvl. Time ; Thra Right ?IDS' Left Thru Right ?IDS! Left Thru jight ?IDS! Left thra Right PEDS Total Peak Hour Knalysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 16:00 on 09/07/00 to 17:45 on 09/07/00 ; Time 17:00 ; 17:00 ; 17:00 ; 17:00 Vol. 1314 39 0; 1 0 2 0; 39 1730 0 0; 22 0 27 0; Pct. 97.1 2.8 0.0; 33.3 0.0 66.6 0.0; 2.2 97.7 0.0 0.0; 44.8 0.0 55.1 0.0 Total 1353 3 1769 49 High 17:15 17:45 17:15 17:00 Vol. 351 18 0; 1 0 1 0; 10 507 0 0; 10 0 7 0; Total 369 2 517 ; 17 PHF 0.916 0.375 0.855 0,720 ; CARS BISCAYNE BLVD Subr itt'eqd into the public TRUCKS 39 1304 0 2 record.,in ct3nnecton with 0 10 0 1730 ftm on�,422,ktL 22 Wafter Foeman 39 1314 0 =__=_ City Cleric Inbound 1 53 1754 Outbound 1754 111111111 NORTHEAST 17TH STREET Total 3107 39 0 2 78 39 0 22 0 0 22 0 Inbound 49 Inbound 3 Outbound 78 Outbound 0 1 0 Total 127 Total 3 0 1 0 0 27 27 0 Inbound 1769 Outbound 1342 Total 3111 27 39 1721 1314 0 9 1 ===== ===== 39 1730 1342 BISCAYNE BLVD PARKING LOT 0 0 0 0 0 0 ; North Site Code :BB17PH00 N -S Street:BISCAYNE BLVD E -N Street:NORTHEAST 17TH STREET Location AIM CARS,TROCES study Rale: BB17PN00 Site Code : 00000000 Start Date: 09107/00 Page : 1 ;BISCAYNE BLVD ;PARXING LOT ;BISCAYNE BLVD ;NORTHEAST 17TH STREET ;Frog North ;Frog East ;Froz South ;From Nest Start ; PEDS; ?EDS; PEDS, PEDS;Intvl. TAe ; Thru Right ?EDS; Left Thru Right PEDS; Left Thru Right PEDS; Left Thru Right ?EDS; Total 09107100 16:00; 250 10 011 1 0 0 0; 11 401 0 0; 6 0 3 0; 682 16:15; 242 8 0; 0 0 1 0; 10 386 0 0; 5 0 8 0; 660 16:30; 238 8 0; 1 0 0 0; 9 412 0 01, 6 0 9 0; 683 16.45' 276 16 0; 0 0 1 0; 11 381 0 011 8 0 10 0, 703 Hour; 1006 42 0; 2 0 2 0; 41 1580 0 0; 25 0 30 0; 2728 1 I 1 I I I 1 1 1 I 17:00; 301 6 0; 0 0 0 0, 8 459 0 0; 10 0 7 0; 791 17:15; 351 18 0; 0 0 1 0; 10 507 0 0; 2 0 3 0; 892 17:30, 335 8 0; 0 0 0 0; 7 381 0 0; 8 0 8 0; 747 17:451 327 7 01 1 0 1 0; 14 383 0 0; 2 0 9 0; 744 Hour; 1314 39 0; 1 0 2 0; 39 1730 0 0; 22 0 27 0; 3174 1 Total; 2320 81 1 0; 3 0 4 1 0; 80 3310 0 I 0; 47 0 57 1 0; 5902 4 Apr. 96.6 3.3 -; 42.8 - S7.1 -; 2.3 97.6 - -; 45.1 - 54.8- 4 Int. 39.3 1.3 -; - - - -; 1.3 56.0 - -; 0.7 - 0.9- 1 1 I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 I I I Sag C into the pubtle rewrd cc ,-,ine tion With Wafter Foeman City Clerk 01- 19.9 Site Code :BBIITPM X -S Street:BISCAYXE BOULEVARD E -W Street:XE 11TH TERRACE Location :MIAMI CARS,TRUCNS Study Name: BBI1TPM Site Code : 00000000 Start Date: 09106100 Pape : 2 BISCAYNE BOULEVARD ;NORTHEAST 11TH TERRACE ;BISCAYNE BOULEVARD ;NORTHEAST 11TH TERRACE ;From North ;From East ;From South ;From West Start ; Peds; Peds; Peds, Peds;Intvl. Time Left Thru Right Peds; Left Thru Right Peds; Left Thru Right Peds; Left Thru Right Peds; Total CARS BISCAYNE BOULEVARD TRUCKS 4 29 2248 441 228 0 16 39 3211 __—_— _—_— ===== __—_= 17 4 29 2264 480 =____ 3456 Inbound 2777 Outbound 3456 N RTHFART 17TH TERRACE Total 6233 29 74 28 17 17 17 0 Inbound 72 Outbound 74 20 Total '146 20 0 17 17 0 Inbound 3465 Outbound 2401 Total 5866 17 17 3196 2264 04 15 120 =____ ____= 17 3211 2401 BISCAYNE BOULEVARD 0 228 28 0 28 Inbound 390 Outbound 735 120 Total 1125 0 120 235 20 735 480 NORTHEAST 17TH TERRACE 224 2 11 0 I.\ 235 2 ; North S'JbrM"te-'6 in�0 ,4? Public rem rl conn?G- on with Walter FSO 011— 199 CRY clerk Site Code :BBI7TPM N -S Street:BISCAYNE BOULEVARD E -N Street:NE 17TH TERRACE Location :MIAMI CARS,TRUCAS Study Mame: BBI7TPM Site Code : 00000000 Start Date: 09/06/00 Page : 1 ;BISCAYNE BOULEVARD ;NORTHEAST 171H TERRACE ;BISCAYNE BOULEVARD ;NORTHEAST 17TH TERRACE ;From North ;From East ;From South :from hest Start ; Peds,' Peds; Peds; Peds;Intvl. Time ' Left Thru Right Peds' Left Thru Right Peds; Left Thru Right Peds; Left Thru Right Peds; Total Peat Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 16:00 on 09/06/00 to 17:45 on 09/06/00 ; Time ; 17:00 ; 17:00 ; 17:00 ; 17:00 Vol. 263 1287 9 4; 57 17 127 10; 10 1665 118 2; 6 11 5 11 Pct. 16.8 82.3 0.5 0.2; 27.0 8.0 60.1 4.7; 0.5 92.7 6.5 0.1; 18.1 33.3 15.1 33.3; Total 1563 211 1795 33 ; High 17:15 17:30 ; 17:15 17:00 ; Vol. 68 355 3 4; 14 4 35 3; 2 490 25 1; 4 5 2 2 Total 430 ; 56 ; SIB ; 13 ; PHF ; 0.908 0.941 0.866 0.634 CARS BISCAYNE BOULEVARD TRUCKS 4 9 1277 240 127 0 10 23 1665 —_—_— 6 4 9 1287 263 1798 Inbound 1563 Outbound 1798 NORTHEAST 17TH TERRACE Total 3361 9 36 17 10 6 6 0 Inbound Outbound 11 Total it 0 5 0 33 36 69 Inbound 1795 Outbound 1349 Total 3144 5 10 1658 1287 (� 0 7 ===57 {===== ===== { 10 1665 1349 BISCAYNE BOULEVARD ibmitted into the public Co in conn echon with M on V!a,Iior Foam,an tRI Clerk10 0 127 17 0 17 Inbound 211 Outbound 392 57 Total 603 0 57 118 11 392 263 NORTHEAST 17TH TERRACE 110 2 8 0 118 2 ; North 01- 199 68% (56%) NE 68% (56%) Miramar Centre Phases II and III Figure Project Trip Distribution 01— 199 5 ( 6a% a-= (56%) NE 17th Teri a' NE 17th Ter ��% (36 %) N LAJZ N 17% (36%) NE 17th St 15% NE 16th St NE 15th Ter -n m NE 15t NE 15t m NE 14 o` 15% Submitted in �- O (a%) remin c0 NE 14th St i%R"1 LEGEND S O pO Signalized o CD • Unsignalized NE thTr z 68% =68% Trips Into N Miramar o NE 13th St 15% 15%� ' (55%) =55% Trips Out of 5 a% Miramar Miramar Centre Phases II and III Figure Project Trip Distribution 01— 199 5 ( Trip Distribution and Assignment In order to determine which roadways would be impacted by Project trips, it is necessary to determine their probable paths. The Miami Urban Area Transportation Study (MUATS) model is used to forecast future year trips on the transportation network in Miami -Dade County. A MUATS run for Miramar indicated the trip distribution depicted on Figure 5. Year 2003 Traffic With Project Trips Total traffic volumes are calculated by adding the volumes indicated on Figure 4 plus the traffic resulting from the trip distribution shown on Figure 5. The results are summarized on Figure 6. Traffic Performance With Project Trips . The study roadways are analyzed for level of service on the basis of future traffic volumes with the Project trips illustrated on Figure 6. Detailed reports of the analyses are included in Appendix F, of which a summary is provided next. Table 6: Future (2003) Intersection Performance With Project Trips Location Afternoon Peak Hour Performance LOS* V/C** Biscayne Blvd. @ NE 13'h St. B+ 0.62 Biscayne Blvd. @ NE I e St. C 0.84 Biscayne Blvd. @ NE 15` St. D+ 0.89 Biscayne Blvd. @ NE 17St. C 0.91 Biscayne Blvd. @ NE 17` Ter. D+ 0.86 Biscayne Blvd. @ NE 19tn St. D+ 0.97 N. Ba shore Dr. @ NE 13` St. B+ 0.38 N. Ba shore Dr. @ NE 14`h St. B+ 0.26 Ulf N. Ba shore Dr. @ NE 15` St. N. Bayshore Dr. @ NE 17` Ter.*** C+ C 0.47 cc N/A NE 17 1h Ter. @ NE &h Ave.*** C " NE 18` St. @ NE 4` Ave. W*** C " NE 18` St. @ NE &h Ave. E*** I A " *Level of Service **Volume Over Capacity Ratio ***Unsignalized Intersection; LOS shown for the worst movement; V/C calculations do not apply. 1tt~it d into the public; )M in connetton witti on Via, Walter Flan City Clerk Table 6 indicates that all intersections will operate at LOS D or better in 2003 with the Project traffic. It should be noted, however, that an analysis of the individual movements indicates the following: a) Biscayne Boulevard at NE 15`h Street: The northbound through/right-turn movement is expected to operate at LOS E+; additionally, the westbound through/right and eastbound movements will operate at LOS E. b) Biscayne Boulevard at NE 17`h Terrace: The southbound and westbound left -turn movement will operate at LOS E+; the northbound through/right movement is expected to operate at LOS E. Traffic Study for Miramar Centre Phases II and III o i — 199 14 October 2000 I NF 19th Tar NE _m_ 4-212 ��� 141 r� 89 42 ♦ ♦ 32� 1� 21 � iR 2124 t-0 F o r 117 f/ Miramar Centre Phases II and III Future (2003) Peak Season Traffic With Project Trips o- 199 Figure 6 141 NE 17th Ter o r 117 f/ a NE 17th Ter 283 ~130 22 6�-�c N Z 17 5 4 453 N az ^ crn +-2^ NE 17th St Z 24-4 'q 29 :t NE 16th St a NE 15th Ter o +— 50 a w 37 X276 85.:. NE 15th St65 213 NE 15t ` 19 267 134— e N 1� ^ 27 ^ A ^ NE 14th Ter o� r L28 —' �0 9 ^� X19 _Im 1 45 ♦— 8 Subrt�tged n ¢ NE 14th St 31 r e9 into t iQ(�rd in corane � s 51---*- ^r 21 42 52 c N ZZL.2 on I CS m wa `^ LEGEND NE 13th Ter o z x m +-0 _ �� " 194i X595" � u O Signalized �' 9 • Unsignalized Miramar Centre Phases II and III Future (2003) Peak Season Traffic With Project Trips o- 199 Figure 6 a) Biscayne Boulevard at NE 19`1' Street: The southbound left -turn and the westbound right -turn movements are expected to operate at LOS E. It should be noted that the traffic signal phasing was optimized at this intersection. All of the above are within the level standard of LOS E as described in the Downtown Miami DRI. A comparison between Tables 4 and 6 indicate the following changes in intersection performance in year 2003 when the Project trips are added: Table 1: 2003 Intersection Performance Comparison Intersection Year 2003 Levels of Service Without Project Traffic With Project Traffic Biscayne Blvd. NE 17 St. C+ C Biscayne Blvd. NE 19 St. A D+ N. Ba shore Dr. 17 Ter. B C NE 17 Ter. P, NE 4 Ave. A C NE 18` St @ NE 4` Ave. W B C Summary Project -generated traffic was added to the traffic volumes expected by 2003. Traffic performance for the resulting traffic volumes was calculated. The only recommended improvement is a change in traffic signal phasing on Biscayne Boulevard at NE 19`h Street. The results indicate that all intersections will operate at LOS D or better in 2003 with Project traffic. It should be noted, however, that an analysis of the individual movements indicates the following: a) Biscayne Boulevard at NE 15`h Street: The northbound through/right-turn movement is expected to operate at LOS E+; additionally, the westbound through/right and eastbound movements will operate at LOS E. b) Biscayne Boulevard at NE 17`h Terrace: The southbound and westbound left -turn movement will operate at LOS E+; the northbound through/right movement is expected to operate at LOS E. c) Biscayne Boulevard at NE 19`h Street: The southbound left -turn and the westbound right -turn movements are expected to operate at LOS E. All of the above are within the level standard of LOS E as described in the Downtown Miami DRI. CONCLUSIONS Traffic performance of 13 intersections near Miramar Phases II and III (Project) was calculated for three scenarios: ■ Existing (2000) ■ Future (2003) Without Project Traffic ■ Future (2003) With Project Traffic Subrta+ittteo WOO thO ptebliC recoq in conne lcn with O_ on aZap_kt Walter Foeman City Clerk 16 Traffic Study for Miramar Centre Phases H and III October 2000 01— Future (2003) With Project Traffic represents the worst-case scenario. In this scenario, Project trips are added to the background traffic expected by 2003. Although lower performance levels were observed compared to the other scenarios, Project trips do not contribute to violate the minimum performance level (LOS E) at the study intersections. Traffic signal phasing modifications to obtain acceptable performance at the intersections are the only recommended improvements at the study intersections. It should be noted that the proposed phasing modifications are recommended at two locations to mitigate existing operations. The only improvement recommended as a result of the Project trips is a traffic signal phasing optimization on Biscayne Boulevard at NW 19`h Street. Su tfollu " Public 4" � men with ona Weber Fog,,,, "WClerk 17 Traffic Study for Miramar Centre Phases 11 and 111 October 2000 01 1 *9 9 APPENDIX A: Traffic Counts Suia"UO;3 the public Jn cor Wafter Foaman Cny Clerk 01- x919 MIRAMAR ('_CWTGC CVIcTIwn_ inn......... �.............__ 01- 199 9:12767\..-r,Volume input 19th ST 18th ST 17th T. 17th ST 6th ST 5th ST Sth ST lth ST !e public Non with th sT— — . r F=oemn Ay Clerk Site Code :0813PH00 N -S Street:BISCIYNE BLVD B -N Street:NORTHEIST 13TH STREET Location : HIAHI StudT Name: BB13PN00 Site Code : 00000000 Start Date: 09/06/00 Page : 2 166 1030 661 203 0 0 0 Inbound 0 Outbound 1030 0 Total 1030 0 0 0 0 0 Inbound 3701 Outbound 2720 Total 6421 2049 198 3456 671 5 42 2720 203 3498 BISCAYNE BLVD 0 198 642 19 661 Inbound 1530 Outbound 0 668 Total 1530 3 671 NORTHEAST 13TH STREET 0 0 0 0 0 0 ; North suw4i tktii 4Cii. ! ?reG k:AEl ipC 1 n CottiD Plt)n with on Wafter F-Owftn QtY Cleric 1 199 CIRS,TROCIS ,BISCAYNE BLVD ;NORTHEAST 13TH STREET ;BISCAYNE BLVD ;NORTHE ;From North ;From Nast ;From South ;From X Start ; PEDS; PEDS; PEDS; PEDS;Intrvl. Time Thru Right PHS.' Left Thru Right PEDS; Left Thru PEDS; PEDS! Total CARS BISCAYNE BLVD TRUCKS 166 1975 0 198 0 74 0 3498 ----- --== ===== ===== 3696 166 2049 0 Inbound 2 15 Outbound 3696 NORTHEAST TH STREET Total 5911 166 1030 661 203 0 0 0 Inbound 0 Outbound 1030 0 Total 1030 0 0 0 0 0 Inbound 3701 Outbound 2720 Total 6421 2049 198 3456 671 5 42 2720 203 3498 BISCAYNE BLVD 0 198 642 19 661 Inbound 1530 Outbound 0 668 Total 1530 3 671 NORTHEAST 13TH STREET 0 0 0 0 0 0 ; North suw4i tktii 4Cii. ! ?reG k:AEl ipC 1 n CottiD Plt)n with on Wafter F-Owftn QtY Cleric 1 199 Site Code :BB13PM00 Study Name: B813PM00 N -S Street:BISCIYNE BLVD Site Code : 00000000 B -W Street:NORTNEIIST 13TH STREET Start Date: 09/06/00 Location : MIAMI Page : 1 CIRS,TRBCKS ;BISCLYNE BLVD ;NORTHEAST 137H STREET ;BISChINE BLVD ;NORTHE ;From North ;From last ;From South ;From W Start ; PEDS; ?SDS; PEDS; PEDS;Intrvl. Time ; Thru Right PEDS; Left Thru flight PEDS; - Left Thru PEDS; PEDS; Total Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 16:00 on 09/06/00 to 17:45 on 09/06/00; Time 17:00 ; 17:00 ; 17:00 ; 17:00 Vol. 1042 90 0; 340 325 110 0; IN 1831 0; 0; Pct. 92.0 7.9 0.0; 43.8 41.9 14.1 0.0; 6.3 93.6 0.0; 0.0; Total 1132 775 1955 0; High 17:45 17:15 17:15 17:15 ; Vol. 315 20 0; 85 87 33 0; 44 462 0; 0 Total 335 205 506 0; PHF 0.844 0.945 0.965 0.000; CARS BISCAYNE BLVD imex 0^40 Ltd b0c TRUCKS 90 1012 0 110ii1 Cannecton with ---0 ---30 ----0 1831 1D. «tea 01 1941 Walter Foemn 90 1042 0 City Clerk Inbound 132 Outbound 1941 NORTHEAST STREET Total 3073 110 90 0 110 539 325 124 320 0 5 325 0 0 Inbound 0 Inbound 775 Outbound 539 Outbound 0 340 0 Total 539 Total 775 0 340 0 0 0 0 0 Inbound 1955 Outbound 1382 Total 3337 1042 121 1811] 340 3 20 1382 124 1831' BISCAYNE BLVD NORTHEAST 13TH STREET 0 0 0 0 0 0 ; North 01— 199 Site Code :BB13PM00 Study Name: B113PN00 N -S Street:BISCAINE BLVD Site Code : 00000000 E -V Street:NORTHEAST 13TH STREET Start Date: 09/06/00 Location : MIAMI Page : 1 CARS,TROCIS ;BISCAINE BLVD ;NORTHEAST 13TH STREET ;BISCAYNB BLVD ;NORTHE ;From North ;From East ;From South ;From N Start ; PEDS; PEDS; PEDS; PEDS;Iatrvl. Time ; Thru. Right PEDS; Left Thru Right PEDS; Left Thru PEDS: PEDS; Total 09/06/00; ; 16:00; 305 23 0; 86 77 22 0; 23 424 D; 0; 960 16:15; 208 16 0; 89 53 29 0; 17 337 0; 0; 749 16:30; 263 20 0; 79 86 16 0; 16 466 0; 0; 946 16:45; 231 17 0; 77 120 21 0; 23 440 0; 0i 929 Hour; 1007 76 0; 331 336 88 0; 79 1667 0; 0; 3584 17:00; 237 25 0, 74 106 23 0; 28 474 0; 0; 967 17:15; 237 24 0; 85 87 33 0; 44 462 0; 0; 972 17:30; 253 21 0; 92 72 22 0; 28 416 0; 0; 904 17:45; 315 20 0; 89 60 32 0; 24 479 0; 0; 1019 Hour; 1042 90 0; 340 325 110 0; 124 1831 0; 0; 3862 Total; 2049 166 0; 671 661 198 0; 203 3498 0; 0; 7446 Apr. 92.5 7.4 -; 43.8 43.2 12.9 -; 5.4 94.5- 4 Int. 27.5 2.2 -; 9.0 8.8 2.6 -; 2.7 46.9 Subnvittea info the public recocl In connection with. Wm on .2=-A.i. Walter Foeman City Clerk Site Code :BBI7TPN N -S Street:BISCAYNE BOULEVARD E -W Street:NE 17TH TERRACE Location :MIAMI CARS,TRUCIS Study Bale: BBI7TPN Site Code : 00000000 Start Date: 09/06100 Page : 1 ;BISCAYNE BOULEVARD ;NORTHEAST 17TH TERRACE ;BISCAYNE BOULEVARD ;NORTHEAST 17TH TERRACE ;From North ;From East ;From South ;From Nest Start ; Peds; Peds; Peds; Peds;Intvl. Time ; Left Thru Right Peds; Left Thru Bight Peds; Left Thru Night Peds; Left Thru Bight Peds; Total _ 09/06/00 16:00; 44 245 4 0; 19 2 19 0; 1 391 36 0; 1 2 2 2; 768 16:15; 54 230 5 0; 9 3 21 2; 1 369 30 0; 7 3 5 1; 740 16:30; 59 225 7 0; 19 5 35 2; 3 406 30 0; 1 1 2 4; 799 16.45; 60 277 4 0; 16 1 26 0; 2 380 21 0; 2 3 3 0; 795 flour; 217 977 20 0; 63 11 101 4; 7 1546 117 0; 11 9 12 7; 3102 17:00; 56 287 2 0; 18 4 27 2; 3 446 32 0; 4 5 2 2; 890 17:15; 68 355 3 4; 13 8 31 3; 2 490 25 1; 1 1 0 2; 1007 17:30; 67 325 2 0; 14 4 35 3; 4 388 30 0; 0 3 2 1; 878 17.45' 72 320 2 0; 12 1 34 2,' 1 341 31 1; 1 2 1 6; 827 Hour; 263 1287 9 4; 57 17 127 10; 10 1665 118 2; 6 11 5 11; 3602 Total; 480 2264 29 4; 120 28 228 14; 17 3211 235 2; 17 20 17 18; 6704 4 Apr. 17.2 81.5 1.0 0.1; 30.7 7.1 58.4 3.5; 0.4 92.6 6.7 -; 23.6 27.7 23.6 25.0; - 4 Int. 7.1 33.7 0.4 -; 1.7 0.4 3.4 0.2; 0.2 47.8 3.5 -; 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2, - , Subrftted into the public record.)in connection with �t �a-on Wafter Foeman City Clerk Site Code :881E19S00 N -S Street:BISCAYNE BLVD. R -N Street:NE 19TH STREET Location MANI CARS,TRDCES Study Name: BB19S00 Site Code : 00000000 Start Date: 09/12/00 Page : 2 ;BISCAYNE BLVD. ;NE 19TH STREET ;BISCAYNE BLVD. ;NE 19TH STREET ;From North ;From East ;From South ;From Nest Start ; ; 11 ; Intvl. Time Left Thru Right MS! Left Thru Right PRDS; Left Thru Night PEDS; Left Thra Right PEDS; Total CARS TRUCKS 3 183 163 17 BISCAYNE BLVD. 3 2513 26 143 0 55 0 3432 ==== ===== ===== 63 3 2568 26 ===== 3638 Inbound 2 97 Outbound 3638 Total 6235 63 63 0 Inbound 232 Outbound 183 122 Total 415 122 0 47 47 0 Inbound 3457 Outbound 2680 Total 6137 47 17 3417 2568 0 15 65 ===== ===== 17 3432 2680 BISCAYNE BLVD. Inbound Outbound Total 0 143 163 0 163 371 156 65 527 0 65 8 122 156 26 NE 19TH STREET SubrMtte d into the public in connection Walter Foeman City Clerk ► 1.99 Site Code :BBBB19S00 I -S Street:BISCAYMB BLVD. B -V Street:ME 19TH STREET Location :MIAMI CARS,TRDCIS Study Mame: BB19S00 Site Code : 00000000 Start Date. 09/12/00 Page : 1 ;BISCAYBB BLVD. ;IE 19TH STREET ;BISCAYIB BLVD. ;SE 19TH STREET ;From Borth ;Fran East ;From South ;From hest Start ; 11 ;Iatvl. Time ; Left Thru Right PERS; Left Thru Right ?EDS; Left Thru Sight PEDS; Left Thru Right RDS! Total Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 16:00 on 09/12/00 to 17:45 on 09/12/00 ; Time ; 17:00 ; 11:00 ; 17:00 ; 17:00 Vol. ; 14 1478 1 0; 39 82 74 0; 12 1787 4 0; 30 75 22 0; Pct. 0.9 98.9 6.6 0.0; 20.0 42.0 37.9 0.0; 0.6 99.1 0.2 0.0; 23.6 59.0 17.3 0.0 Total 1493 195 1803 127 ; High 17:15 17:45 17:15 17:00 ; Vol. 4 409 0 0; 12 19 22 0; 3 514 1 0; 9 21 5 0; Total 413 53 518 35 PHF 0.903 0.919 0.870 0.907 ; 22 22 0 Inbound 1803 Outbound 1539 Total 3342 22 12 1780 1478 0 7 39 =__== _____ 12 1787 1539 BISCAYNE BLVD. 4 75 93 14 NE 19TH STREET 4 0 0 0 4 0 ; North Of. IV 4 Su Witted into the pubili ", CARS BISCAYNE BLVD. re in connection uvW1 TRUCKS 1 1445 14 74 On -2-4 — 0 33 0 1787 man 1 sEGeF00er _ _____ _____ ===== —1 30 City Clerk C 1478 14 1891 Inbound 1193 Outbound 1891 H STREET Total 3384 1 0 74 95 82 12 82 30 0 82 30 0 Inbound 127 Inbound 195 Outbound 95 Outbound 93 39 75 Total 222 Total 288 0 39 75 0 22 22 0 Inbound 1803 Outbound 1539 Total 3342 22 12 1780 1478 0 7 39 =__== _____ 12 1787 1539 BISCAYNE BLVD. 4 75 93 14 NE 19TH STREET 4 0 0 0 4 0 ; North Of. IV 4 Site Code :BBNE19S00 US Street:BISCITNE BLVD. I-V Street:BE 19TH STREET Location :MIAMI CARS,TRDCES Study Rame: BB19S00 Site Code : 00000000 Start Date: 09/12/00 Page : 1 ;BISCATAS BLVD. ;RE 19TH STREET ;BISCAYRE BLVD. :11 19TH STREET ;From forth ;From East ;From South ;From Nest Start ; 11 11 ;Intel. Time ; Left Thru Right PEDS' Left Thru Right. ?EDS; Left Thru Eight PEDS; Left Thru Hight ?EDS; Total 09/12/00 11 ' 16:00; 3 274 0 0; 5 16 17 0; 0 413 0 0; 6 13 5 0; 752 16:15; 2 275 0 0; 4 22 12 0; 2 392 1 0, 7 10 6 0; 733 16:30; 3 267 1 0; 7 16 18 0; 0 438 1 0; 8 9 5 0; 773 16:45; _ 4 274 1 0; 10 27 22 0; 3 402 2 0; 12 15 9 0; 781 Hour; 12 1090 2 0; 26 81 69 0; 5 1645 4 0; 33 47 25 0; 3039 17:00; 5 319 0 0; 7 20 17 0; 4 468 2 0; 9 21 5 0; 877 17:15; 4 409 0 0; 11 22 19 0; 3 514 1 0; 7 22 6 0; 1018 17:30; 3 372 1 0; 9 21 16 0; 2 425 1 0; 9 17 7 0; 883 17:45; 2 378 0 0; 12 19 22 0; 3 380 0 C 5 15 4 0; 840 Hour; 14 1478 1 0; 39 82 74 0; 12 1787 4 0; 30 75 22 0; 3618 Total; 26 2568 3 0; 65 163 143 0; 17 3432 8 0; 63 122 47 0; 6657 1 Apr. 1.0 98.8 0.1 -; 17.5 43.9 38.5 -; 0.4 99.2 0.2 -; 27.1 52.5 20.2- I Int. 0.3 38.5 - -; 0.9 2.4 2.1 -; 0.2 51.5 0.1 -; 0.9 1.8 0.7 -; - it Subr-,��.e �to t p t7tic tion wit' record in c011c+� oniiB Wawr Fin City Clark 9 Site Code :NBSDI3SPK N -S Street:131YSHORE DRIVE B -V Street:NE 13TH STREET Location :HMI CdRS,TRDCIS N.BIYSHORE DR. ;NE 13TH STREET ;Frot North ;Fro' East Start ;Iatrvl. Tire Thru Right PEDS; Left Thru Right ?IDS'_ Total CARS N.BAYSHORE DR. TRUCKS 492 417 0 292 ----- 9 ----- 30 ----- ----- 0 292 501 447 0 Inbound 48 Outbound 292 -------------- Total 1240 501 1540 1039 0 0 0 Inbound 0 Outbound 1540 0 Total 1540 0 0 0 0 0 Study We: BS13PN00 Site Code : 00000000 Start Date: 09/07/00 Page : Z 40 292 1026 13 1039 Inbound 1342 Outbound 0 11 Total 1342 0 11 Inbound 0 NE 13TH STREET Outbound 458 Total 458 447 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 M 458 0 0 0 0 ; North -------------- ' Seg 41 ted into the Public reC0in COnncv,cn witr on M'a�Zcr F `'man C4}' Ciera Site Code :NBSDI3SPN N -S Street:N.BAYSIORE DRIVE 14 Street:NE 13TH STREET Location :MIAMI CARS,TRDCES Study Name: IS13PN00 Site Code : 00000000 Start Date: 09/07/00 Page : 1 CARS TRUCKS -------------- 275 817 542 0 0 0 Inbound Outbound 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 N.BAYSHORE DR. 272 231 0 140 3 18 0 140 ---- ----- ----- 275 249 0 Inbound 24 Outbound 140 Total 664 0 Inbound 817 Outbound 817 Total Inbound 0 Outbound 257 Total 257 249 0 0 8 0 0 257 0 0 -------------- 18 140 532 10 542 690 0 8 690 0 8 NE 13TH STREET 0 0 0 0 M 0 0 ; North 01-- 199 N.BAYSIORE DR. ;NE 1371 STREET Fron North ;Frog East Start ; 11 ;Intrvl. Time ; Thru Right PEDS; Left Thru Right PEDS; Total Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 16:00 on 09/07/00 to 17:45 on 09107/00 Tiee 16:45 ; 16:45 Vol. 249 275 0; 8 542 140 0 Pct. 47.5 52.4 0.0; 1.1 78.S 20.2 0.0 Total 524 690 ; High 17:00 16:45 ; Vol. 66 84 0; 0 170 40 0; Total 150 210 PIF 0.873 0.821Sia ante the public In connection with / lil L- . z ::� WaRer Foman City Clerk CARS TRUCKS -------------- 275 817 542 0 0 0 Inbound Outbound 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 N.BAYSHORE DR. 272 231 0 140 3 18 0 140 ---- ----- ----- 275 249 0 Inbound 24 Outbound 140 Total 664 0 Inbound 817 Outbound 817 Total Inbound 0 Outbound 257 Total 257 249 0 0 8 0 0 257 0 0 -------------- 18 140 532 10 542 690 0 8 690 0 8 NE 13TH STREET 0 0 0 0 M 0 0 ; North 01-- 199 Site Code :NBSDI3SPM StudY Nave: BS13PM00 N -S Street:N.BAYSHORI DRIYI Site Code : 00000000 14 Street:NB 13TH STREET Start Date: 09/07100 Location :MIAMI Page : 1 CARS,TRDCIS ;H.BAYSHOII DR. ;NB 13TH STRBIT ;Frov North ;Froi Bast Start ; ;Intrvl. Tine ; Thru Right ?IDS; Left Thru Right PBDS; Total 09107100; 16:00; 51 50 0; 1 135 46 0; 283 16:15; 39 46 0; 2 128 29 0; 244 16:30; 57 56 0; 0 125 34 0; 272 16:45; 53 49 0; 0 170 40 0; 312 Hour; 200 201 0; 3 558 149 0; 1111 17:00; 66 84 0; 1 120 33 0; 304 17:15; 66 68 0; 5 139 35 0; 313 17:30; 64 74 0; 2 113 32 0; 285 17:45; 51 74 0; 0 109 43 0; 277 Hour; 247 300 0; 8 481 143 0; 1179 Total; 447 501 0; 11 1039 292 0; 2290 % Apr. 47.1 52.8 -; 0.8 77.4 21.7- 4 Int. 19.5 21.8 -; 0.4 45.3 12.7 -; - Sutarfitted into the public recorjj in connection �l-�1L Walter Foeman City Clerk 01— 199 Site Code :ABSI5SPA f -S Street:A.BAYSBORE DRIVE E-1 Street:AE 15TR STREET Location :MIAMI CARS,TROCRS Study Aare: BS1500 Site Code : 00000000 Start Date: 09/12/00 Page : 2 ;f.BAYSBORE DR. is 15TH STREET ;A.BAYSBORE DR. ;AE 1579 STREET ;Frog forth ;Fros East ;From South ;Prot hest Start ; 1. ;Intel. Tiae Left Thru Right PEDS, Left Thru Right PEDS; Left Thru Right PEDS; Left Thru Right HDS; Total CARS TRUCKS 87 622 520 15 107 107 0 N.BAYSHORE DR. 87 666 41 63 0 37 0 227 ===== ===== --=== 107 87 703 41 ===== 397 Inbound 31 Outbound 397 Total 1228 Inbound 640 Outbound 622 481 Total 1262 481 0 Inbound 607 Outbound 573 Total 1180 0 63 520 0 520 24 0 24 51 481 573 41 Inbound 293 NE 15TH STREET Outbound 779 Total 1072 52 15 202 51 0 703 0 25 0 0 M 24 _____ _____ 15 227 51 0 ; 779 North N.BAYSHORE DR. ; suhmmaled 52 52 0 Water Fo&mn Inbound 607 Outbound 573 Total 1180 0 63 520 0 520 24 0 24 51 481 573 41 Inbound 293 NE 15TH STREET Outbound 779 Total 1072 52 15 202 51 0 703 0 25 0 0 M 24 _____ _____ 15 227 51 0 ; 779 North N.BAYSHORE DR. ; suhmmaled into the pubric nme n Lwith on Water Fo&mn City Clerk 1— 1919 Site Code :NBS15SPN Study fate: BS1500 US Street:f.BAYSHORE DRIVE Site Code : 00000000 E -W Street:fE 15TH STREET Start Date: 09112/00 Location :MIAMI Page. : i CARS,TRDCKS ;1.81YSHORE DR. ;11 151H STREET ;f.BAYSHORE DR. ,1E 15TH STREET ;From forth ;From East ;From South ;From West Start ; ; ; ; ;Intel. _ Time ; Left Thru Right PEDS; Left Thru Right PEDS; Left Thru Right PEDS; Left Thru Right PEDS; Total Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 16:00 on 09112100 to 17:45 on 09/12100 ; Time 17:00 ; 17:00 ; 17:00 ; 17:00 ; Vol. 19 420 41 0, 2 289 34 0; 7 108 35 0; 60 247 25 0; Pct. 3.9 87.5 8.5 0.0; 0.6 88.9 10.4 0.0; 4.6 72.0 13.3 0.0; 18.0 74.3 7.5 0.0 Total 480 325 150 332 High 17:30 17:30 17:00 17:30 ; Vol. 4 111 10 0; 1 80 9 0; 4 27 14 0; 22 68 4 0; Total 125 90 45 94 PHF ; 0.960 ; 0.902 ; 0.833 ; 0.882 CARS TRUCKS 41 337 289 7 60 60 0 N.BAYSHORE 411 397 0 23 Inbound 332 Outbound 337 247 Total 669 247 0 25 25 0 420 19 34 0 108 60 19 ===== 202 Inbound 480 Outbound 202 Total 682 Inbound 150 Outbound 447 Total 597 25 7 94, 420 0 14 2 ===== ===== 7 108 447 N.BAYSHORE DR. SubvRilted into the public coq in connection with PZ ---2 on ALL WalWr Foeman City Clerk 35 0 0 0 35 0 ; North o — 199 0 34 289 0 289 Inbound 325 Outbound 301 2 Total 626 0 2 35 247 301 19 NE 15TH STREET 35 0 0 0 35 0 ; North o — 199 Site Code :1BS15SPM f -S Street:l.BAYSHORB DRIVE B -W Street:1E 15TH STREET Location :MIAMI CARS,TRDCiS Study lase: BS1500 Site Code : 00000000 Start Date: 09/12/00 Page : 1 :f.BAYSHORE DR. ;fB 15TH STREET ;f.1AYSHO16 DR. ;fs 15tH STREET ;From forth ',From Bast ;From South ;From West Start ; 11 ; Intvl. Time ' Left Thru Right PEDS' Left Thru Right PEDS; Left Thru Right PEDS; Left Thru Right PEDS; Total 09112100 ' 11' 16:00; 1 79 9 0; 5 51 6 0; 2 33 6 01, 4 72 5 0; 279 16:15; 3 60 19 0; 8 64 5 0; 3 27 4 0', 10 59 4 0; 266 16:30; 5 70 11 0; 3 49 10 0; 3 27 2 0; 10 58 10 0; 258 16:45', 7 74 7 0; 6 67 8 0; 0 32 4 0; 23 45 8 011 281 Hour', 22 283 46 0,' 22 231 29 0; 8 119 16 0,1 47 234 27 0; 1084 1 { 1 1 I 17:00; 3 104 15 0', 1 77 8 0; 4 27 14 01, 11 61 9 0; 334 17:15; 9 99 9 01, 0 76 12 0; 2 25 10 01, 12 51 7 0; 312 17:30; 4 111 10 0; 1 80 9 0; 1 25 7 O; 22 68 4 0; 342 17:45; 3 106 7 0; 0 56 5 0; 0 31 4 0,1 15 67 5 0; 299 Hour; 19 420 41 0; 2 289 34 0; 7 108 35 0; 60 247 25 0; 1287 1 Total; 41 703 87 1 0; 24 520 63 { 0; 15 227 51 1 0; 107 481 52 { 0; 2371 T Apr. 4.9 84.5 10.4 -; 3.9 85.6 10.3 -; 5.1 77.4 17.4 -; 16.7 75.1 8.1- I Int. ; 1.7 29.6 3.6 -; 1.0 21.9 2.6 -; 0.6 9.5 2.1 -; 4.5 20.2 2.1- I 1 I 1 I I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 Subeniited into the public ra in -connection with ftnm�� on,�2Za2A( WrYY /w a y lly ( +� (rn/ ' 199 Site Code :BBSI4SPB B -S Street:B.BAYSHORE DRIVE E -N Street:BE 14TH STREET Location AIABI CARS,TRUCiS Study Base: IS1400 Site Code : 00000000 Start Date: 09/12100 Page : 2 ;B.BAYSHORS DR. ;BE 14TH STREET ;B.BAYSHORE DR. ;BE 1471 STREET ;From Borth ;From East ;From South ;From Nest Start ; 11 ;Iatvl. Time Left Thru flight PEDS; Left Thru Right PEDS; Left Thru Right PEDS; Left Thru Right PEDS; Total CARS N.BAYSHORE DR. TRUCKS 19 715 8 15 54 37 0 239 -----===== ----- ----- 154 73 752 8 ===== 408 Inbound 33 Outbound 408 NE -14TH STREET Total 1241 73 123 35 15 39 154 115 Inbound Outbound 30 Total 30 0 98 98 0 282 123 405 Inbound 258 Outbound 910 Total 1168 98 15 214 752 0 25 60 ===== ===== 15 239 910 N.BAYSHORE DR. 0 15 35 0 35 Inbound 110 Outbound 42 60 Total 152 0 60 4 30 42 8 NE 14TH STREET 4 0 0 0 M 4 0 ; North Subrnitted into the public record in C6Pr9nezt )n with Mm 2&--�L. on & Wtl r Fran City C4esk Site Code :NBS14SP8 Study Name: BS1400 I -S Street:I.BAISHORE DRIVE Site Code : 00000000 E -N Street:IB 14T1 STREET Start Date: 09/12/00 Location :MIAMI Page : 1 CARS,TRQCIS ;N.BAYSHORE DR. ;IE 14TH STREET ;N.BAYSHORE DR. ;IB 14TH STREET ;From North ;From East ;From South ;Fro& Nest Start ; ; ; ;Intal. Time ; Left Thru Right ?EDS; Left Thru Right PEDS; Left Thru Right PEDS; Left Thru Right PEDS; Total Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 16:00 on 09112/00 to 17:45 on 09/12/00 ; Time 17:00 ; 17:00 ; 17:00 ; 17:00 ; Vol. 3 434 38 0; 44 21 B 0; 11 ill 3 0; 82 19 48 0; Pct. 0.6 91.3 8.0 0.0; 60.2 28.7 10.9 0.0; 8.8 88.8 2.4 0.0; 55.0 12.7 32.2 0.0; Total ; 475 73 125 ; 149 ; High 17:30 17:00 17:15 17:15 ; Vol. 0 113 9 0; 13 B 2 D; 3 31 0 0; 20 5 17 0; Total 122 23 34 42 ; PHF 0.973 ; 0.793 ; 0.919 0.886 ; Subcaltted Into the public CARS N.BAYSHORE DR. remjk in conn cion TRUCKS 10 411 3 8 ROM �— on Q - I= 061 28 23 0 111 r Fo: ,-r n ===== ========== 82 I Clerk 38 434 3 175 201 Inbound Outbound 201 E 14TH STREET Total 676 38 0 8 70 21 11 21 21 0 21 82 61 Inbound 149 Inbound 73 Outbound 70 Outbound 25 44 19 Total 219 Total 98 0 44 19 0 48 48 0 Inbound 125 Outbound 526 Total 651 48 it 97 434 0 14 44 526 N.BAYSHORE DR. 3 19 25 3 NE 14TH STREET 3 0 0 0 M 3 0 ; North of- 199 Site Code :NBSI4SPM N -S Street:N.BAYSHORE DRIVE B -N Street:NE 1411 STREET Location :MIAMI CARS,TRDC[S Study Name: BS1400 Site Code : 00000000 Start Date: 09/12/00 Page : 1 ;N.BAYSHORE DR. ;NE 14TH STREET ;N.BAYSIORE DR. ;NE 14TH STREET ;From North ;From East ;From South ;From Nest Start ; ; Intel. _ Time I Left Thru Right PEDS; Left Thru Right PEPS; Left Thru Right PEDS; Left Thru Right PEDS; total 09/12/00 1. 11 11 . ' 16:00; 0 86 8 0; 2 5 3 0; 3 35 1 0; 13 3 9 0; 168 16:15; 0 70 7 0; 3 5 2 0; 0 26 0 0; 19 4 8 0; 144 16:30; 2 78 13 0; 8 2 0 0; 0 27 0 0; 20 0 17 0; 167 16:45; 3 84 7 0; 3 2 2 0; 1 40 0 0; 20 4 16 0; 182 _ Hour; 5 318 35 0; 16 14 7 0; 4 128 1 0; 72 11 50 0; 661 17:00; 2 110 9 0; 13 8 2 0; 4 27 0 0, 22 3 14 0; 214 17:15; 0 104 12 0; 10 4 1 0; 3 31 0 0; 20 5 17 0; 207 17:30; 0 113 9 0; 12 5 1 0; 1 26 3 0; 25 4 9 0; 208 17:45'. 1 107 8 0; 9 4 4 0; 3 27 0 0; 15 7 8 0; 193 Hour; 3 434 38 0; 44 21 8 0; 11 111 3 0; 82 19 48 0; 822 Total; 8 752 73 0; 60 35 15 0; 15 239 4 0; 154 30 98 0; 1483 4 Apr. 0.9 90.2 8.7 -; 54.5 31.8 13.6 -; 5.8 92.6 1.5 -; 54.6 10.6 34.7- 4 Int. ; 0.5 50.7 4.9 -; 4.0 2.3 1.0 -; 1.0 16.1 0.2 -; 10.3 2.0 6.6 -; - SubrOlfted Into the public recorg in connection with Wn = on _2ZQ2A, Walter Foemn City Clerk 01- 199 Site Code :NBSI4SPM N -S Street:N.BAYSHOR9 DRIVE E -V Street:NE 17TH TERRACE Location :MIAMI CARS,TRDCIS ;N.BAYSHORE DR. ;N.BAYSHORE DR. ;119 17TH TERRACE ;Froi North ;Frog South ;Frov Nest Start ; ;Intrvl. Tile Thru Right ?IDS; Left Thru PEDS; Left Right PEDS; Total N.BAYSHORE DR. 3 341 110 t 354 HE 17TH 'TERRACE 630— 89/07/00 e4: Oem 0 :45pM 8 2 1391. 1734 763 71, N 1733 t 617 1904 103 H.BAYSHORE DR. Study Nate: BSD177 Site Code : 00000000 Start Date: 09/07/00 Pape : 2 SuibrNtted into the public reCv in Connen with it onL WsWr Finan Cfty Cleric 01- 190 Site Code :XBSIISPM X -S Street:13USHORE DRIVE B -N Street:XE 17TH TERRACE Location :MIAMI Peak Hous Tiee Vol. Pct. Total High Vol. Total PHP CARS,TROCIS Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 16:00 on 09/07/00 to 17:45 on 09/07/00 17:00 ; 17:00 ; 17:00 ; 121 2 0, 323 44 0; 4 423 0; 98.3 1.6 0.0; 88.0 11.9 0.0; 0.9 99.0 0.0; 123 367 427 17:45 17:30 17:00 ; 41 1 0; 99 9 0; 2 125 0; 42 108 127 ; 0.732 0.849 0.840 Study lase: RSD177 Site Code : 00000000 Start Date: 09/07/00 Pape : 1 r1ic the pudic 3nne�.'�ic�h Wafter Edman City Clerk Site Code :103I4SPM US Street:N.BAYSHORE DRIVE B -N Street:BB 17TH TERRACE Location :MIAMI Study Bale: BSD177 Site Code : 00000000 Start Date: 09/07/00 Pape : 1 Subanifted onto the public record in canna dean with on 2L-tQ-,L Wafter an CARS,TROCBS ,B.BAYSHORB DR. ,B.BAYSHORB DR. ;BB 17TH TBRRACB :From Borth :From South ;Frog Nest Start ; ;Intrvl. Time ; Thru Right PBDS; Left Thru ?IDS! Left Right PBDS; Total 09107/00, 16:00; 40 0 0; 80 16 C 0 BO O; 216 16:15; 32 1 0; 72 18 0; 2 93 0; 218 16:30; 24 0 0; 69 13 0; 1 78 0; 185 16:45' 24 0 0; 73 11 0; 1 89 0; 198 Hour; 120 1 0; 294 58 0; 4 340 0; 817 17:00; 22 0 0; 84 11 0; 2 125 0; 244 17:15; 24 0 0; 60 13 0, 0 83 0; 180 17:30; 34 1 0; 99 9 0; 1 110 0; 254 17:45; 41 1 0; 80 11 0; 1 105 0; 239 _ Hour; 121 2 0; 323 44 0; 4 423 0; 917 Total; 241 3 0; 617 102 C 8 763 O; 1734 Apr. 98.7 1.2 -; 85.8 14.1 -; 1.0 98.9- I Int. 13.8 0.1 -; 35.5 5.8 -; 0.4 44.0 -; - Study Bale: BSD177 Site Code : 00000000 Start Date: 09/07/00 Pape : 1 Subanifted onto the public record in canna dean with on 2L-tQ-,L Wafter an Site Code :4A17TPM N -S Street:1E4TH AVENUE I-V Street:NE 117H TERRACE Location :MIAMI CARS,TRUCIS ;NORTHEAST 4TH AVENUE ;NORTHEAST 17TH TERRACE ;NORTHEAST 17TH TERRACE ;From North ;From East ;From hest Start ; Peds; Peds; Peds;Iutrvl. Time ; Left Right Peds; Thru Right Peds; Left Thru Peds; Total NORTHEAST 4TH AUENUE 12 5 15 4 It 32 NORTHEAST MH TERRACE 376 8 /0%/$0 11 8�: i36pF1 05:4Spn 4 1113. 1129 1113 G-- 364 733 733 NORTHEAST 17TH TERRACE Studp Name: iA17tPM Site Code : 00000000 Start Date: 09/06/00 Page : 2 Submitted into the public rec:oni in conneolio a ws°:ra i'tw '�2? on Walter Fm -man City Clerk 01— 199 Site Code :4117TPl l -S Street:X14TH AVESUE B -W Street:lE 17TH TERRACE Location :MIAMI CIRS,TRUCIS Peak lour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 16:00 on 09106/00 to 17:45 on 09/06/00 Tise 17:00 ; 17:00 17:00 11 Vol. ; 1 8 0; 193 1 0; 1 391 0; Pct. ; 11.1 88.8 0.0; 99.4 0.5 0.0; 0.2 99.7 0.0; Total 9 194 392 High 17:30 17:15 17:45 Vol. 0 4 0; 50 1 0; 0 105 0; Total 4 51 105 PHF ; 0.562 0.950 ; 0.933 Study lase: 4A171PM Site Code : 00000000 Start Date: 09/06/00 Page : 1 tto the publlC inneefion wih on Waller Fean City Clerk 01- 199 Site Code :1117TPN N -S Street:1E4TH AVENUE E -W Street:NE 17TH TERRACE Location :MIAMI CARS,TRUCES ;NORTHEAST 4TH AVENUE ;NORTHEAST 17TH TERRACE ;NORTHEAST 17TH TERRACE ;Froe North ;Fros East ;Fros West Start ; Peds; Peds; Peds;Intrvl. Time ; Left Right Peds; Thru Right Peds; Left Thru Peds; Total_ 09J06J00; 16:00; 3 2 0; 38 8 0; 1 81 0; 133 16:15; 0 1 0; 32 1 0; 0 87 0; 121 16:30; 1 1 0; 58 1 0; 0 90 0; 151 16.45' 0 0 0; 43 0 0: 2 84 0; 129 Hour; 4 4 0; 171 10 0; 3 342 0; 534 17:00; 1 0 0; 49 0 0; 0 93 0, 143 17:15; 0 2 0; 50 1 0; 1 93 0; 147 17:30; 0 4 0; 49 0 0; 0 100 0; 153 17:45! 0 2 0' 45 0 0; 0 105 0; 152 Hour; 1 8 0; 193 1 0; 1 391 0; 595 Total 5 12 0; 364 it 0; 4 733 0; 1129 t Apr. 29.4 70.5 -; 97.0 2.9 -; 0.5 99.4- 4Int. 0.4 1.0 -; 32.2 0.9 -; 0.3 64.9 -; - Studs Naie: 4A17TPN Site Code : 00000000 Start Date: 09/06/00 Pape : 1 SW"Otteai into the public reco connection h on Walter Foeman City Clerk 11 '°` 199 Site Code :14A18SPM M -S Street:NORTHBAST 4TH AYB(EASTSIDE) E -W StreetAORTHEAST 18TH STREET Location :MIAMI Study Mase: 4A818SPM Site Code : 00000400 Start Date: 09/06100 Page : 2 CARS,TROCKS ;NORTHEAST 4TH AVB (BASTSID ;NORTHEAST 18TH STREET ;NORTHEAST 4TH AVB (BASTSID ;NORTHEAST 18TH STREET ;From North ;From Bast ;From South ;From West Start ; Peds; Peds; Peds; Peds;Iatvl. Time Left Thru Right Peds; Left Thru Right Peds; Left Thru Right Peds; Left Thru Right Peds; Total CARS TRUCKS 31 36 5 1 1 0 Inbound Outbound 31 Total 31 0 0 0 0 NORTHEAST 4TH AVE (EASTSIDE 0 0 60 1 0 0 0 0 0 60 Inbound 60 Outbound 1 Total 61 0 0 31 0 31 32 Inbound 31 36 Outbound 108 0 68 Total 139 0 0 Inbound 22 Outbound 0 Total 22 fl 0 I 0 10 11 51 01 17 NORTHEAST 4TH AVE (EASTSIDE) 17 31 108 60 NORTHEAST 18TH STREET 0 0 0 ; North nX0(d in MM00,a rt with ftn 122--5> o,2,Qa A.L_ Wer Foeman Cfty Clerk 199 Site Code :84A18SPM Study Name: 4A818SPM N -S Street:NORTHBAST 4TH AVB(BASTSIDE) Site Code : 00000000 B -N Street:NORTHBAST 18TH STREET Start Date: 09/06/00 Location :MIAMI Page : 1 CARS,TROCAS ,NORTHEAST 4TH AVE (BASTSID ;NORTHEAST 18tH STREET ;NORTHEAST OH AVE (BASTSID ;NORTHEAST 18tH STREET ;From North ;From East ;From South ;From Kest Start ; Peds; Peds; Peds; Peds;Iatvl. Time ; Left Thru Right Peds Left Thru Right Peds; Left Thru Right Peds; Left Thru Right Peds; Total Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 16:00 on 09106/00 to 17:45 on 09/06/00 ; Time ; 17:00 ; 17:00 ; 17:00 ; 17:00 Vol. 40 0 0 0; 0 21 0 0; 0 0 7 0; 0 A 0 0; Pct. 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0; 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0; 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0; 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 Total 40 21 7 18 High 17:30 17:45 17:00 17:00 Vol. 13 0 0 0; 0 8 0 0; 0 0 4 0; 0 7 0 0; Total 13 8 4 7 ; PHP 0.769 0.656 0.437 0.642 21 21 NORTHEAST 4TH AVE (EASTSIDE) 01 0 40 0 0 0 w 0 0 0 Inbound 18 Outbound 21 18 Total 39 18 0 0 0 0 0 40 Inbound 40 Outbound 0 Total 40 Subotted into the pubtac record in conne cn �wfti, ttwnZ-� on/42ZZU WsUr Foe-, an Inbound 21 Outbound 65 Total 86 Inbound 7 Outbound 0 Total 7 11 01 0 0 01 01 7 NORTHEAST ITH AVE (EASTSIDE) 0 0 21 0 21 0 0 0 7 18 65 40 NORTHEAST 18TH STREET 0 0 M 0 ; North - 199 Site Code :141183PM A -S Street:NORTHBAST 4TH AVB(BASTSIDS) B -N Street:NORTHBAST 18TH STREET Location :MIAMI Study lase: 4AB18SPM Site Code : 00000000 Start Date: 09/06100 Page : 1 CARS,TROCIS ;NORTHEAST 4TH AVE (BASTSID ;NORTHEAST 18TH STREET ;NORTHEAST 47H AVE (BASTSID ;NORTHEAST 18TH STREIT ;From North ;From Bast ;From South ;From (test Start ; Peds; Peds; Peds; Peds,Intvl. Time ; Left Thru Right Peds; Left Thru Night Peds; Left Thru Right Peds; Left Thru Right Peds; Total 16:00; 5 0 0 0; 0 1 0 0; 1 0 1 0; 1 2 0 0; li 16:15; 7 0 0 0; 0 6 0 0; 0 0 4 0; 0 2 0 0; 19 16:30; 5 0 0 0; 0 1 0 0; 3 0 1 0; 0 4 0 0; 14 16:45; 3 0 0 0; 0 2 0 0; 1 0 4 0; 0 5 0 0; 15 Hour; 20 0 0 0; 0 10 0 0; 5 0 10 0; 1 13 0 0; 59 17:00; 10 0 0 0; 0 6 0 6; 0 0 4 0; 0 7 0 0, 27 17:15; 11 0 0 0; 0 5 0 0; 0 0 1 0; 0 0 0 0; 17 17:30; 13 0 0 0; 0 2 0 0; 0 0 0 0; 0 6 0 0; 21 17:45; 6 0 0 0; 0 8 0 0; 0 0 2 0; 0 5 0 0; 21 _ Hour; 40 0 0 0; 0 21 0 0; 0 0 7 0; 0 18 0 0; 86 Total; 60 0 0 0; 0 31 0 0; 5 0 17 0; 1 31 0 0; 145 4 Apr. 100.0 - - -; - 100.0 - -; 22.7 - 77.2 -; 3.1 96.8 - -; - Int. 41.3 - - -; - 21.3 - -; 3.4 - 11.7 -; 0.6 21.3 - -; - SulNt sntn the public recalm In COilnC "`s' (, n with Waiter an CRY Clerk 01— 199 Site Code :E4118SPN N -S Street:109THEAST 4TH AVE(NESTSIDE) I-V Street:MORTHEAST 18tH STREET Location :KIAKI Study Maze: 4AN18SPN Site Code : 00000000 Start Date: 09/06/00 Page : 2 CARS,TROCIS ;NORTHEAST 4TH AVE (NESTSID ,NORTHEAST 18TH STREET ;MORTREAST 4TH AVE (NESTSID ;MORTBEAST 1871 STREET ;From North ;From Bast ;From South ;From Nest Start ; Peds; Peds; Peds; Peds;Intvl. Time Left Thru Right Peds; Left Thru Right Peds; Left Thru Right Peds; Left Thru Right Peds; Total CARS NORTHEAST 4TH AVE (WESTSIDE) TRUCKS 3 24 2 157 0 0 0 1 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 3 24 2 158 Inbound 29 Outbound 158 NORTHEAST STREET Total 187 3 114 33 78 1 1 0 Inbound 63 —Outbound 114 34 Total '177 34 0 28 28 0 0 0 33 0 33 Inbound 35 Outbound 38 2 Total 73 0 2 Inbound 237 Outbound 54 Total 291 28 78 153 2 24 0 4 0 2 ====_ ===== ===== 78 157 2 54 NORTHEAST 4TH AVE (WESTSIDE) 2 34 38 2 NORTHEAST 18TH STREET 0 0 M 0 ' North SuWdttead into the public record in connexion with MMonC2� Walter F=an City Clerk o - 199 Site Code :E4118SPM B -S Street:HOHTHEAST 4TH AVE(VESTSIDE) B -V StreetAOHTHEAST 18TH STREET Location :MIAMI Peak Hol Tive Vol. Pct. Total High Vol. Total PHF Cas'TBOCES it Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 16:00 on 09/06/00 to 17:45 on 09/06/00 Study Vase: 4AV18SPM Site Code : 00000000 Start Date: 09/06/00 Page : 1 17:00 ; 17:00 ; 17:00 ; 17:00 ; 2 12 0 0; 2 19 0 0; 46 89 2 0; 0 20 20 0; 14.2 85.7 0.0 0.0; 9.5 90.4 0.0 0.0; 33.5 64.9 1.4 0.0; 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0; 14.1 ; 137 40 .1 17:30 ; 17:45 ; 17:30 ; 17:00 ; 2 3 0 0; 0 8 0 0; 16 24 0 0; 0 7 6 0 5 ; 8 ; 40 13 ; 0.700 ; 0.656 ; 0.856 ; 0.769 ; CARS NORTHEAST 4TH AVE (WESTSIDE) TRUCKS 0 12 2 89 0 0 0 89 0 12 2 Inbound 14 Outbound 89 NORTHEAST 18TH STREET Total 103 19 65 46 0 0 0 Inbound Outbound 20 Total 20 0 20 20 0 Submitted into the public reco,qln conneiJ' on vi; x.4.1 Walter Rernan City Clerk 0 0 19 0 19 40 Inbound 21 65 Outbound 24 2 105 Total 45 0 2 2 20 24 2 Inbound 137 NORTHEAST 18TH STREET Outbound 34 Total 171 20 46 86 2 12 0 3 0 2 ===== ===== ===== 46 89 2 34 NORTHEAST 4TH AVE (WESTSIDE) I;\ North 61_ 199 Site Code 34118SPM f -S Street:NORTHEAST 4TH AVE(WESTSIDE) 8-W Street:NORTHEAST 18TH STREET Location :MIAMI Study Name: 4AW18SPM Site Code : 00000000 Start Date: 09/06/00 Page : 1 CARS,TROC6S ;NORTHEAST 4TH AVB (WESTSID ;NORTHEAST 18TH STREET ;NORTHEAST 4TH AVB (WESTSID ;NORTHEAST 1871 STREET ;From forth ;From East ;From South 'Prot West Start ; Peds; Peds; Peds; Peds;Intvl. Time ; Left Thru Right Peds; Left Tbru Right Peds; Left Thru Right Peds; Left_ Thru Right Peds; Total 09/06/00 ' ' 16:00; 0 1 0 0; 0 1 0 0; 8 22 0 0; 1 3 3 0' 39 16:15; 0 3 1 0; 0 6 0 0; 12 13 0 0; 0 2 1 0; 38 16:30; 0 3 0 0; 0 4 0 0; 7 17 0 0; 0 4 2 0; 37 16.45' 0 5 2 O' 0 3 0 0' 5 16 0 0' 0 5 2 0' 38 Hour; 0 12 3 0; 0 14 0 0; 32 68 0 0; 1 14 8 0; 152 17:00; 0 4 0 0; 0 6 0 0; 11 17 2 0; 0 7 6 0; 53 11:15; 0 4 0 0; 1 4 0 0; 12 23 0 0; 0 0 4 0; 48 17:30; 2 3 0 0; 1 1 0 0; 16 24 0 0; 0 6 6 C 59 17:45; 0 1 0 0; 0 8 0 0; 7 25 0 V 0 7 4 0; 52 Hour; 2 12 0 0; 2 19 0 0; 46 89 2 0; 0 20 20 0; 212 Total; 2 24 3 0; 2 33 0 0; 78 157 2 0; 1 34 28 0; 364 4 Apr. 6.8 82.7 10.3 -; 5.7 94.2 - -; 32.9 66.2 0.8 -; 1.5 53.9 44.4- t Int. 0.5 6.5 0.8 -; 0.5 9.0 - -; 21.4 43.1 0.5 -; 0.2 9.3 7.6 -; - recOM 1n cannelPublic onpp � C/ Wafter Ferman City Clerk of-- 199 ,SvOrAlU d into the public record In connection 7z-.--? with hmn on -2Z.-&2 ! Walter Foerrtatt Volume Report with 24 Hour Totals Page 1 Data File : D0907004.PRN Station : 000000000002 Identification : 000000000615 Interval : 15 minutes Start date : Sep 7, 00 Start time : 00:00 Stop date : Sep 7, 00 Stop time : 24:00 City/Town : MIAMI County : DADE Location : NE 17 TER BETWEEN NE 4 AVE & N BAYSHORE Sep 7 Northbound Volume for Lane 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- End Time 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 -------- ---- 15 26 ---- ---- 12 ---- 10 ---- 4 3 ---- ---- 8 8 ---- 28 ---- ---- 42 63 ---- 49 ---- 54 30 21 20 10 11 8 12 14 42 61 53 43 53 45 22 14 9 9 4 8 13 54 59 40 62 50 00 23 9 7 4 9 7 21 41 53 45 60 47 -------- ---- Hr Total 92 ---- ---- 55 ---- 36 ---- 28 24 ---- ---- 35 56 ---- 165 ---- ---- 215 201 ---- 214 ---- 204 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- End Time 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 -------- ---- 15 42 ---- ---- 69 ---- 58 ---- 60 90 ---- ---- 94 83 ---- 53 ---- ---- 39 46 ---- 33 ---- 41 30 67 57 65 85 82 90 77 57 58 34 39 42 45 68 62 58 81 79 99 64 47 45 28 19 24 00 56 53 67 72 83 90 70 55 62 28 19 33 ------- ---- Hr Total 233 ---- ---- 241 -------- 248 298 334 ---- ---- 373 294 ---- 212 ---- ---- 204 136 ---- 110 ---- 140 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 24 Hour Total : 4148 AM peak hour begins : 08:15 AM peak volume : 236 Peak hour factor : 0.94 PM peak hour begins : 17:00 PM peak volume : 373 Peak hour factor : 0.94 Sep 7 Southbound Volume for Lane 2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- End Time 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 -------- ---- 15 27 ---- ---- 22 7 ---- ---- 6 5 ---- ---- 10 36 ---- 75 ---- ---- 136 127 ---- 101 ---- 64 30 42 12 8 11 8 16 41 59 99 86 86 60 45 23 11 11 5 7 23 45 77 68 91 72 58 00 18 11 9 2 20 31 67 101 112 103 96 88 -------- ---- Hr Total 110 ---- ---- 56 35 ---- ---- 24 40 ---- ---- 80 189 ---- 312 ---- ---- 415 407 ---- 355 ---- 270 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- End Time 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 -------- ---- 15 86 ---- ---- 72 82 ---- ---- 83 80 ---- ---- 125 101 ---- 79 ---- ---- 62 51 ---- 66 ---- 35 30 86 97 80 86 93 83 109 78 72 45 37 28 45 79 94 104 96 78 110 104 79 55 39 38 24 00 64 80 106 77 89 105 79 65 59 52 38 30 -------- ---- Hr Total 315 ---- ---- 343 372 ---- ---- 342 340 ---- ---- 423 393 ---- 301 ---- ---- 248 187 ---- 179 ---- 117 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- z4 Hour Total : 5853 AM peak hour begins : 08:45 AM peak volume : 416 Peak hour factor : 0.82 PM peak hour begins : 17:30 PM peak volume : 425 Peak hour factor : 0.97 99 in cOnne on I1L.��^+I Waita FOOman Volume Report with 24 Hour 40',tals Cray C(erkPage 1 Data File : D0907003.PRN Station : 000000000001 Identification : 000000000212 Interval : 15 minutes Start date : Sep 7, 00 Start time : 00:00 Stop date : Sep 7, 00 Stop time : 24:00 City/Town : MIAMI County : DADE Location : N BAYSHORE DR BETWEEN NE 18 ST & 17 TER Sep 7 Northbound Volume for Lane 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- End Time 00 -------- ---- 01 ---- ---- 02 03 ---- 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 - 15 4 4 1 1 ---- 1 ---- ---- 0 1 ---- 10 ---- ---- ---- 6 9 6 ---- 12 30 2 8 3 3 1 0 4 3 10 9 17 10 45 2 0 0 1 1 2 3 5 12 18 8 7 00 2 ---- 2 3 1 1 1 3 6 11 15 14 17 -------- Hr Total 10 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- ---- 14 7 ---- 6 ---- 4 ---- ---- 3 11 ---- 24 ---- ---- ---- 39 51 45 ---- 46 End Time 12 -------- ---- 13 ---- ---- 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 15 13 11 10 ---- 16 ---- 16 ---- ---- 11 16 ---- 19 ---- ---- ---- 9 5 12 ---- 5 30 10 8 12 10 18 13 12 10 8 2 8 8 45 16 20 9 10 13 9 20 9 5 8 6 7 00 9 ------- ---- 9 ---- ---- 8 19 11 11 7 8 10 7 5 4 Hr Total 48 48 39 ---- 55 ---- 58 ---- ---- 44 55 ---- 46 ---- ---- ---- 32 22 31 ---- 24 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 24 Hour Total : 762 AM peak hour begins : 09:30 AM peak volume : 56 Peak hour factor : 0.78 PM peak hour begins : 15:45 PM peak volume : 66 Peak hour factor : 0.87 ******************************************************************************* Sep 7 Southbound Volume for Lane 2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- End Time 00 -------- ---- 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 15 8 ---- ---- 9 0 ---- 3 ---- 1 ---- ---- 0 3 ---- 16 ---- ---- ---- 8 32 20 ---- 11 30 10 7 5 2 0 1 5 10 17 21 33 14 45 7 5 1 1 2 2 15 12 12 22 24 17 00 3 -------- ---- 6 ---- 9 1 0 2 4 11 11 22 22 36 Hr Total 28 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- 27 15 ---- 7 ---- 3 ---- ---- 5 27 ---- 49 ---- ---- ---- 48 97 99 ---- 78 End Time 12 -------- ---- 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 15 26 ---- ---- 17 15 ---- 23 ---- 40 ---- ---- 22 38 ---- 41 ---- ---- ---- 27 16 18 ---- 14 30 19 17 23 30 32 24 30 24 21 7 8 13 45 35 34 27 12 24 34 40 15 27 25 15 19 00 24 -------- ---- 29 19 33 24 41 21 33 18 4 12 4 ur Total 104 •----------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- ---- 97 84 ---- 98 ---- 120 ---- ---- 121 129 ---- 113 ---- ---- ---- 93 52 53 ---- 50 24 Hour Total : 1597 AM peak hour begins : 09:45 AM peak volume : 99 Peak hour factor : 0.75 PM peak hour begins : 17:45 PM peak volume : 149 Peak hour fctor : 0.91 01- 1 Volume Report with 24 Hour Totals Page 1 Data File : D09070O2.PRN Station : 000000000006 Identification : 000000000082 Interval : 15 minutes Start date Sep 7, 00 Start time : 00:00 Stop date : Sep 7, 00 Stop time : 24:00 City/Town : MIAMI County : DADE Location : BISCAYNE BLVD SOUTH OF NE 17TH TERRACE Sep 7 Southbound Volume ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- End Time 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 -------- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- 15 87 40 23 23 18 26 77 264 476 540 391 309 30 80 41 29 29 27 34 98 305 442 498 338 309 45 59 46 20 25 25 47 178 386 523 403 275 361 00 60 31 20 14 40 70 211 441 551 440 329 406 -------- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- Hr Total 286 158 92 91 110 177 564 1396 1992 1881 1333 1385 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- End Time 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 -------- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- 15 319 268 234 200 265 311 248 187 128 162 100 99 30 305 314 228 246 249 371 218 172 184 143 99 105 45 264 299 242 248 246 340 191 195 111 110 99 84 00 317 305 267 262 294 331 216 165 166 106 113 89 ------- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- Hr Total 1205 1186 971 956 1054 1353 873 719 589 521 411 377 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 24 Hour Total : 19680 AM peak hour begins : 08:30 AM peak volume : 2112 Peak hour factor : 0.96 PM peak hour begins : 17:00 PM peak volume : 1353 Peak hour factor : 0.91 ******************************************************************************* ti�dl iti`� 'G'r�✓'. i r.HiJ BAc'�= public recofi�oon 4 Wafter Foenm City C" in Wier i=ce t City aft Volume Report with 24 Hour Totals Page 1 Data File : D0907001.PRN Station : 000000000007 Identification : 000000000533 Interval : 15 minutes Start date : Sep 7, 00 Start time : 00:00 Stop date : Sep 7, 00 Stop time : 24:00 City/Town : MIAMI County : DADE Location : BISCANE BLVD SOUTH OF NE 17TH TERRACE Sep 7 Northbound Volume ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- End Time 00 -------- ---- 01 ---- 02 03 04 ---- ---- 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 15 129 52 ---- 29 22 20 ---- ---- ---- 26 68 175 ---- ---- 179 235 ---- 311 ---- 332 30 115 50 36 25 29 47 96 169 216 219 245 287 45 60 26 27 23 22 52 135 197 242 253 280 359 00 62 -------- ---- 37 27 23 18 71 147 197 267 286 305 318 Hr Total 366 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- 165 ---- ---- ---- 119 93 89 ---- ---- ---- 196 446 738 ---- ---- 904 993 ---- 1141 ---- 1296 End Time 12 -------- ---- 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 15 377 ---- 369 ---- ---- ---- 307 352 407 ---- ---- ---- 470 413 274 ---- ---- 222 205 ---- 160 ---- 137 30 320 348 298 326 394 512 394 231 214 185 134 116 45 332 408 247 362 421 412 284 222 164 151 132 101 00 351 -------- ---- 328 ---- 267 355 392 376 239 235 185 185 143 116 Ar Total 1380 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1453 ---- ---- ---- 1119 1395 1614 ---- ---- ---- 1770 1330 962 ---- ---- 785 726 ---- 569 ---- 470 24 Hour Total : 20119 AM peak hour begins : 11:30 AM peak volume : 1374 Peak hour factor : 0.91 PM peak hour begins : 16:30 PM peak volume : 1795 Peak hour factor : 0.88 ******************************************************************************* in Wier i=ce t City aft APPENDIX B: Traffic Signal Data Subtted Into the public record n cd,;► rmn on Wer Ftt1 CkY Cisdi 2362INTERSECTION STATUS REPORT FOR 2362 US 1 & NE 13 ST A A S Y M CYC B 90EARLY NI MIN SECTION 3 OFFSET TRUE 107 AOG 75 21 TOD PATTERN 9 OFFSET DESIRED 107 BOG 19 12 EARLY YIELD 0 TS 5 LINE # 8 COG 8 7 CONTR STAT R NL SECTION C.L. 115 DOG 0 0 CONTR OPER SA SENDING SKIP NO 7 0 CURRENT INTERVAL DURATIONS -- SUM = 115 49 1 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 7 3 15 21 NSG G Y R WP Y R NL Y 4 1 20 4 74 1 4 1 19 4 1 8 3 23 0 30 1 A A S Y M CYC B 90EARLY NI 6 90NITE M2 C 63LATE NIG 2362 US 1 & NE 13 ST 90AM PEAK TIMING FOR DAY # 5 (SECTION TIME PT OFF NSG G Y R WP Y R NL Y 90AVG M2 0 MIN: 20 12 7 0 11 40 49 1 4 1 20 4 1 7 3 15 21 40 49 1 4 1 20 4 1 7 3 115 23 0 30 1 4 1 12 4 1 7 3 500 19 0 30 1 4 1 12 4 1 7 3 545 1 40 49 1 4 1 20 4 1 7 3 615 2 46 49 1 4 1 20 4 1 7 3 745 12 62 49 1 4 1 20 4 1 7 3 845 16 53 67 1 4 1 19 4 1 10 3 1200 17 12 70 1 4 1 19 4 1 7 3 1345 10 12 70 1 4 1 19 4 1 7 3 1545 9 107 74 1 4 1 19 4 1 8 3 1630 18 107 74 1 4 1 19 4 1 8 3 1800 3 34 49 1 4 1 20 4 1 7 3 1900 1 40 49 1 4 1 20 4 1 7 3 2130 11 40 49 1 4 1 20 4 1 7 3 2367 PAGE 1 3) PAGE 4 S Y M CYC 90EARLY NI 6 90NITE M2 6 63LATE NIG 6 63DAWN M2 90AVG M2 0 90PRE AM M 90AM PEAK 110MID MORN 110NOON M2 110AFT M1 0 115PRE PM P 115PM PEAK 90POST PM 90AVG M2 0 90EARLY NI Sulu tted into the public redoin urine rr with waiter Foeman City Clerk 01- INTERSECTION STATUS REPORT FOR 2367 US 1 & NE 14 ST 2367 US 1 & NE 14 ST MIN SECTION 3 OFFSET TRUE 7 AOG 71 20 TOD PATTERN 9 OFFSET DESIRED 7 BOG 35 20 EARLY YIELD 0 TS 6 LINE # 8 COG 0 0 CONTR STAT 1 SECTION C.L. 115 DOG 0 0 CONTR OPER SA SENDING SKIP NO 12 1 4 CURRENT INTERVAL DURATIONS -- SUM = 115 30 55 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 12 1 4 115 NSW F Y R EWW F G Y 6 4 1 7 65 6 4 1 7 12 16 4 500 19 0 24 A A B B B 7 12 1 4 2367 US 1 & NE 14 ST TIMING FOR DAY # 5 (SECTION TIME PT OFF NSW F Y R EWW F G Y MIN: 14 6 12 1 0 11 30 55 6 4 1 7 12 1 4 15 21 30 55 6 4 1 7 12 1 4 115 23 0 24 6 4 1 7 12 1 4 500 19 0 24 6 4 1 7 12 1 4 545 1 30 55 6 4 1 7 12 1 4 615 2 27 50 6 4 1 7 12 6 4 745 12 36 50 6 4 '1 7 12 6 4 845 16 5 65 6 4 1 7 12 11 4 1200 17 6 65 6 4 1 7 12 11 4 1345 10 6 65 6 4 1 7 12 11 4 1545 9 7 65 6 4 1 7 12 16 4 1630 18 7 65 6 4 1 7 12 16 4 1800 3 28 55 6 4 1 7 12 1 4 1900 1 30 55 6 4 1 7 12 1 4 2130 11 30 55 6 4 1 7 12 1 4 PAGE 1 3) PAGE 4 S Y M CYC 90EARLY NI 6 90NITE M2 6 59LATE NIG 6 59DAWN M2 90AVG M2 0 90PRE AM M 90AM PEAK 110MID MORN 110NOON M2 110AFT M1 0 115PRE PM P 115PM PEAK 90POST PM 90AVG M2 0 90EARLY NI SubW#od kiso the public re In connoeftn with Welter Foeman City Clerk 1-- 199 2381INTERSECTION STATUS REPORT FOR 2381 US 1 & NE 15 ST SECTION 3 OFFSET TRUE 2 AOG TOD PATTERN 9 OFFSET DESIRED 2 BOG EARLY YIELD 0 TS 7 LINE # 8 COG CONTR STAT NSW SECTION C.L. 115 DOG CONTR OPER SA SENDING SKIP NO Y CURRENT INTERVAL DURATIONS -- SUM = 115 MIN: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NSW F Y R WL Y EWW F G Y R NSL Y 55 6 4 1 7 3 7 11 6 4 1 7 3 A A 1 B C C C 7 D MIN 61 13 7 5 24 19 7 5 2381 US 1 & NE 15 ST TIMING FOR DAY # 5 (SECTION TIME PT OFF NSW F Y R WL Y EWW F G Y R NSL Y MIN: 7 6 5 11 1 5 0 11 7 35 6 4 1 7 3 7 11 1 4 1 7 3 15 21 0 14 6 4 1 5 3 7 11 1 4 1 5 3 115 23 0 14 6 4 1 5 3 7 11 1 4 1 5 3 500 19 3 39 6 4 1 5 3 7 11 1 4 1 5 3 545 1 27 35 6 4 1 7 3 7 11 1 4 1 7 3 615 2 35 35 6 4 1 7 3 7 11 1 4 1 7 3 745 12 42 35 6 4 1 7 3 7 11 1 4 1 7 3 845 16 18 52 6 4 '1 10 3 7 11 1 4 1 7 3 1200 17 6 55 6 4 1 7 3 7 11 1 4 1 7 3 1345 10 6 55 6 4 1 7 3 7 11 1 4 1 7 3 1545 9 2 55 6 4 1 7 3 7 11 6 4 1 7 3 1630 18 7 55 6 4 1 7 3 7 11 6 4 1 7 3 1800 3 7 35 6 4 1 7 3 7 11 1 4 1 7 3 1900 1 27 35 6 4 1 7 3 7 11 1 4 1 7 3 2130 11 7 35 6 4 1 7 3 7 11 1 4 1 7 3 PAGE 1 3) PAGE 4 S Y M CYC 90EARLY NI 7 65NITE M2 7 65LATE NIG 90DAWN M2 90AVG M2 0 90PRE AM M 90AM PEAK 110MID MORN 110NOON M2 110AFT M1 0 115PRE PM P 115PM PEAK 90POST PM 90AVG M2 0 90EARLY NI tojconn Public reco" ftm If) Witt,r WmDr poernan CkY Ctelk 01- 1()Ck 4288INTERSECTION STATUS REPORT FOR 4288 US 1 & NE 17 ST 4288 US 1 & NE 17 ST MIN SECTION 3 OFFSET TRUE 54 AOG 68 22 TOD PATTERN 9 OFFSET DESIRED 54 BOG 18 18 EARLY YIELD 0 TS 7 LINE # 7 COG 16 10 CONTR STAT 8 SECTION C.L. 115 DOG 0 0 CONTR OPER SA SENDING SKIP NO 4 15 21 CURRENT INTERVAL DURATIONS -- SUM = 115 1 6 11 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 15 15 NSW F Y R EW F G Y WG Y 10 4 Soo 53 15 4 1 6 11 1 4 16 4 6 11 1 A A 10 B B B C 87 28 15 4 4288 US 1 & NE 17 ST TIMING FOR DAY # 5 (SECTION TIME PT OFF NSW F Y R EW F G Y WG Y MIN: 7 15 11 1 10 0 11 87 28 15 4 1 6 11 1 4 16 4 15 21 87 28 15 4 1 6 11 1 4 16 4 115 23 0 15 15 4 1 6 11 1 4 10 4 Soo 19 0 15 15 4 1 6 11 1 4 10 4 545 1 87 28 15 4 1 6 11 1 4 16 4 615 2 17 28 15 4 1 6 11 1 4 16 4 745 12 25 28 15 4 1 6 11 1 4 16 4 845 16 0 48 15 4 '1 6 11 1 4 16 4 1200 17 56 48 15 4 1 6 11 1 4 16 4 1345 10 56 48 15 4 1 6 11 1 4 16 4 1545 9 54 53 15 4 1 6 11 1 4 16 4 1630 18 0 53 15 4 1 6 11 1 4 16 4 1800 3 87 24 15 4 1 6 11 1 4 20 4 1900 1 87 28 15 4 1 6 11 1 4 16 4 2130 11 87 28 15 4 1 6 11 1 4 16 4 PAGE 1 3) PAGE 4 S Y M CYC 8 90EARLY NI 8 90NITE M2 6 71LATE NIG 6 71DAWN M2 8 90AVG M2 0 8 90PRE AM M 8 90AM PEAK 8 110MID MORN 8 110NOON M2 8 110AFT M1 0 8 115PRE PM P 8 115PM PEAK 8 90POST PM 8 90AVG M2 0 8 90EARLY NI Suk>"vitted into the public recorg� �conneogn revlttt WaWr FOemn City Clerk 0-1— 199 4136INTERSECTION STATUS REPORT FOR 4136 US 1 & NE 17 TERR PAGE 1 3u�a r: MIN SECTION 3 OFFSET TRUE 54 AOG 65 17 TOD PATTERN 9 OFFSET DESIRED 54 BOG 19 19 EARLY YIELD 0 TS 0 LINE # 9 COG 18 5 CONTR STAT SECTION C.L. 115 DOG 0 0 CONTR OPER SA SENDING SKIP NO CURRENT INTERVAL DURATIONS -- SUM = 115 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NSW F Y EWW F G Y SL Y R 55 10 4 6 12 1 4 18 4 1 A A B B B C 4136 US 1 & NE 17 TERR TIMING FOR DAY # 5 (SECTION 3) PAGE 4 TIME PT OFF NSW F Y EWW F G Y SL Y R S Y M CYC MIN: 7 10 12 1 5 0 11 88 41 10 4 6 12 1 4 7 4 1 90EARLY NI 15 21 88 41 10 4 6 12 1 4 7 4 1 90NITE M2 115 23 0 20 10 4 6 12 1 4 5 4 1 6 67LATE NIG 500 19 0 20 10 4 6 12 1 4 5 4 1 6 67DAWN M2 545 1 88 41 10 4 6 12 1 4 7 4 1 90AVG M2 0 615 2 3 40 10 4 6 12 1 4 8 4 1 90PRE AM M 745 12 23 41 10 4 6 12 1 4 7 4 1 90AM PEAK 845 16 8 52 10 4 '6 12 1 4 16 4 1 110MID MORN 1200 17 49 53 10 4 6 12 1 4 15 4 1 110NOON M2 1345 10 52 50 10 4 6 12 1 4 18 4 1 110AFT M1 0 1545 9 54 55 10 4 6 12 1 4 18 4 1 115PRE PM P 1630 18 14 55 10 4 6 12 1 4 18 4 1 115PM PEAK 1800 3 1 40 10 4 6 12 1 4 8 4 1 90POST PM 1900 1 88 41 10 4 6 12 1 4 7 4 1 90AVG M2 0 2130 11 88 41 10 4 6 12 1 4 7 4 1 90EARLY NI the, public re in Connection wii jh keo�t on `.2/22N1 Wehor Foenmn City Clerk 2390INTERSECTION STATUS REPORT FOR 2390 US 1 & NE 19 ST MIN PAGE 1 Submiitteo IMO the public ccrtnection with on=9.d22 Waftor FOaman City Clerk 01- 199 SECTION 3 OFFSET TRUE 54 AOG 81 21 TOD PATTERN 9 OFFSET DESIRED 54 BOG 26 26 EARLY YIELD 0 TS 1 LINE # 9 COG 0 0 CONTR STAT OC SECTION C.L. 115 DOG 0 0 CONTR OPER SA SENDING SKIP NO CURRENT INTERVAL DURATIONS -- SUM = 115 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NSG G Y EWW F G Y 80 1 4 7 18 1 4 A A B B B 2390 US 1 & NE 19 ST TIMING FOR DAY # 5 (SECTION 3) PAGE 4 TIME PT OFF NSG G Y EWW F G Y S Y M CYC MIN: 20 18 1 0 11 35 55 1 4 7 18 1 4 90EARLY NI 15 21 0 30 1 4 7 18 1 4 6 65NITE M2 115 23 0 30 1 4 7 18 1 4 6 65LATE NIG 500 19 0 30 1 4 7 18 1 4 6 65DAWN M2 545 1 35 55 1 4 7 18 1 4 90AVG M2 0 615 2 66 55 1 4 7 18 1 4 90PRE AM M 745 12 74 55 1 4 7 18 1 4 90AM PEAK 845 16 53 75 1 4 7 18 1 4 110MID MORN 1200 17 58 75 1 4 7 18 1 4 110NOON M2 1345 10 58 75 1 4 7 18 1 4 110AFT M1 0 1545 9 54 80 1 4 7 18 1 4 115PRE PM P 1630 18 45 80 1 4 7 18 1 4 115PM PEAK 1800 3 32 55 1 4 7 18 1 4 90POST PM 1900 1 35 55 1 4 7 18 1 4 90AVG M2 0 2130 11 35 55 1 4 7 18 1 4 90EARLY NI Submiitteo IMO the public ccrtnection with on=9.d22 Waftor FOaman City Clerk 01- 199 2361 INTERSECTION STATUS REPORT FOR 2361 N BAYSHORE & NE 13 ST PAGE 1 MIN SECTION 161 OFFSET TRUE 24 AOG 30 18 TOD PATTERN 3 OFFSET DESIRED 24 BOG 42 28 EARLY YIELD 0 TS 0 LINE # 245 COG 0 0 CONTR STAT SECTION C.L. 80 DOG 0 0 CONTR OPER SA SENDING SKIP NO CURRENT INTERVAL DURATIONS -- SUM = 80 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 SW F Y WW F G Y 20 10 4 7 19 16 4 A A B B B 2361 N BAYSHORE & NE 13 ST TIMING FOR DAY # 5 (SECTION 161) PAGE 4 TIME PT OFF SW F Y WW F G Y S Y M CYC MIN: 8 10 19 2 0 5 0 8 10 4 7 19 2 4 6 54NIGHT 2/ 530 4 21 20 10 4 7 19 18 4 7 82AVG 0/3 700 1 21 24 10 4 7 19 12 4 80AM PEAK 900 4 21 20 10 4 7 19 18 4 7 82AVG 0/3 1100 2 23 24 10 4 7 19 12 4 80MID—DAY 1400 4 21 20 10 4 7 19 18 4 7 82AVG 0/3 1600 3 24 20 10 4 '7 19 16 4 80PM PEAK 1900 4 21 20 10 4 7 19 18 4 7 82AVG 0/3 2200 6 21 20 10 4 7 19 18 4 7 82AVG 0/3 Subugzlotiuu a "ui the public IiVf'(1 -Q on +2�1a Walter Fooman City Clerk 01- 199 2366INTERSECTION STATUS REPORT FOR 2366 N BAYSHORE & NE 14 ST PAGE 1 MIN SECTION 161 OFFSET TRUE 23 AOG 38 23 TOD PATTERN 3 OFFSET DESIRED 23 BOG 19 19 EARLY YIELD 0 TS 1 LINE # 245 COG 10 5 CONTR STAT 7 SECTION C.L. 80 DOG 0 0 CONTR OPER SA SENDING SKIP NO CURRENT INTERVAL DURATIONS -- SUM = 80 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NSW F Y R EWW F G Y R NSL Y 29 9 4 1 7 11 1 4 1 10 3 A A B B B C 2366 N BAYSHORE & NE 14 ST TIMING FOR DAY # 5 (SECTION 161) PAGE 4 TIME PT OFF NSW F Y R EWW F G Y R NSL Y S Y M CYC MIN: 14 9 11 1 5 0 5 0 29 9 4 1 7 11 1 4 1 10 3 6 80NIGHT 2/ 530 4 20 29 9 4 1 7 11 1 4 1 10 3 7 80AVG 0/3 700 1 20 29 9 4 1 7 11 1 4 1 10 3 7 80AM PEAK 900 4 20 29 9 4 1 7 11 1 4 1 10 3 7 80AVG 0/3 1100 2 21 29 9 4 1 7 11 1 4 1 10 3 7 80MID-DAY 1400 4 20 29 9 4 1 7 11 1 4 1 10 3 7 80AVG 0/3 1600 3 23 29 9 4 1 7 11 1 4 1 10 3 7 80PM PEAK 1900 4 20 29 9 4 1 7 11 1 4 1 10 3 7 80AVG 0/3 2200 6 20 29 9 4 1 7 11 1 4 1 10 3 6 80AVG 0/3 Sulbrrslft -J into the public, recxxc3 In conne ora with inn on �1Cf1L Wafter F&Jvnan City Clerk 01— 199 2380INTERSECTION STATUS REPORT FOR 2380 N BAYSHORE & NE 15 ST PAGE 1 MIN SECTION 161 OFFSET TRUE 17 AOG 23 19 TOD PATTERN 3 OFFSET DESIRED 17 BOG 6 5 EARLY YIELD 0 TS 2 LINE # 245 COG 25 25 CONTR STAT SECTION C.L. 80 DOG 9 5 CONTR OPER SA SENDING SKIP NO CURRENT INTERVAL DURATIONS -- SUM = 80 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NSW F Y R EWL Y EWW F G Y R NSL Y 12 11 4 1 6 3 7 17 1 4 2 9 3 A A B C C C D 2380 N BAYSHORE & NE 15 ST TIMING FOR DAY # 5 (SECTION 161) PAGE 4 TIME PT OFF NSW F Y R EWL Y EWW F G Y R NSL Y S Y M CYC MIN: 8 11 5 17 1 5 0 5 0 10 11 4 1 0 0 7 17 1 4 2 0 0 6 7 57NIGHT 2/ 530 4 0 14 11 4 1 8 3 7 17 1 4 2 10 3 7 85AVG 0/3 700 1 0 12 11 4 1 7 3 7 17 1 4 2 8 3 80AM PEAK 900 4 0 14 11 4 1 8 3 7 17 1 4 2 10 3 7 85AVG 0/3 1100 2 13 11 11 4 1 7 3 7 17 1 4 2 9 3 80MID-DAY 1400 4 0 14 11 4 1 8 3 7 17 1 4 2 10 3 7 85AVG 0/3 1600 3 17 12 11 4 1 6 3 7 17 1 4 2 9 3 80PM PEAK 1900 4 0 14 11 4 1 8 3 7 17 1 4 2 10 3 7 85AVG 0/3 2200 6 0 14 11 4 1 8 3 7 17 1 4 2 10 3 7 85AVG 0/3 Sut brae, into 010 public re In coron ect�lo with W& t=to*man City Clerk 01.- 199 APPENDIX C: Calculation of Traffic Volume Growth Rates 0tv" public recot in cap em Waf'kraft city CL -ac O1� 199 Location US NOF NE 11 ST USI SOF NE 13 ST US NOF NE 13 ST USI NOF NE 19 ST g:127671excellhistoric counts Table C-1: Traffic Volume Projections State Facilities in Downtown Miami Linear Regression Results R -Square Traffic Volume Projections Statistics 1995 1999 0.64 35,500 41,900 0.09 36,000 42,400 0.09 34,500 37,700 0.41 32,700 38,700 Counts 1999 40,300 40,800 36,900 37,200 Projs/ Counts 1.04 1.04 1.02 1.04 SubrM tef sato thv: public rem In c0runee,- on ,ivith iiem on , . Walter l"ooman City Clerk 0 - ` Location: US 1 N OF NE 11 ST Year Counts Proiections 1994 38,500 35,500 1995 34,000 37,100 1996 38,000 38,700 1997 39,000 40,300 1998 44,000 41,900 1999 43,500 43,500 2000 45,100 Traffic Volume Projections State Facilities in Downtown Miami SUMMARY OUTPUT Repression Statistics (3W Multiple R 01 ItC R Square 0.64 � CIL n Standard Error 2509.98 Observations 6 C.) C) Traffic Volume Projections State Facilities in Downtown Miami SUMMARY OUTPUT Repression Statistics Multiple R 0.80 R Square 0.64 Adjusted R Square 0.55 Standard Error 2509.98 Observations 6 ANOVA d/ SS MS F Significance F Regression 1 44800000 44800000 7.111111 0.056 Residual 4 25200000 6300000 Total 5 70000000 Intercept -3154900 1197900.438 -2.633691 0.057962 -6480811.698 171011.6968 -6480811.698 vv, --fu 171011.6968 X Variable 1 1600 600.0000001 2.666667 0.056 -65.87051338 3265.870514 -65.87051338 3265.870514 Location: US 1 S OF NE 13 ST Year Counts Proiections 1994 36,500 34,500 1995 33,000 36,000 1996 37,500 37,600 1997 39,000 39,200 1998 43,500 40,800 1999 41,000 42,400 2000 44,000 9 a cn a Q Multiple R 0.81 R Square 0.66 Adjusted R Square 0.57 Standard Error 2382.48 Observations 6 Cr g:127671excellhistoric counts Traffic Volume Projections State Facilities in Downtown Miami SUMMARY OUTPUT Regression Statistics Multiple R 0.81 R Square 0.66 Adjusted R Square 0.57 Standard Error 2382.48 Observations 6 ANOVA of SS MS F Significance F Regression 1 44003571.43 44003571 7.752307 0.049600173 Residual 4 22704761.9 5676190 Total 5 66708333.33 Intercept -3127461.91 1137048.343 -2.750509 0.051348 -6284420.749 29496.93839 -6284420.749 29496.93839 X Variable 1 1585.71429 569.5206244 2.784297 0.0496 4.468261103 3166.960311 4.468261103 3166.960311 Location: US 1 N OF NE 13 ST Year Counts Proiections 1994 40,000 33,700 1995 28,000 34,500 1996 32,500 35,300 1997 35,000 36,100 1998 41,500 36,900 1999 37,000 37,700 2000 38,500 gV7671excellhistorlc counts Traffic Volume Projections State Facilities in Downtown Miami SUMMARY OUTPUT Regression Statistics Multiple R 0.30 R Square 0.09 Adjusted R Square -0.14 Standard Error 5306.44 Observations 6 ANOVA d1 SS MS F Significance F Regression 1 11200000 11200000 0.397751 0.562491059 Residual 4 112633333.3 28158333 Total 5 123833333.3 Coefficients intercept -1001033.11 2532526.054 -0.61659 0.570867 -8592967.464 5469900.797 -8592967.464 5469900.797 X Variable 1 800.0000002 1268.482408 0.630675 0.562491 -2721.879067 4321.879068 -2721.879067 4321.879068 m,. s CD Cr � C1 gV7671excellhistorlc counts Traffic Volume Projections State Facilities in Downtown Miami SUMMARY OUTPUT Regression Statistics Multiple R 0.30 R Square 0.09 Adjusted R Square -0.14 Standard Error 5306.44 Observations 6 ANOVA d1 SS MS F Significance F Regression 1 11200000 11200000 0.397751 0.562491059 Residual 4 112633333.3 28158333 Total 5 123833333.3 Coefficients intercept -1001033.11 2532526.054 -0.61659 0.570867 -8592967.464 5469900.797 -8592967.464 5469900.797 X Variable 1 800.0000002 1268.482408 0.630675 0.562491 -2721.879067 4321.879068 -2721.879067 4321.879068 Location: US 1 N OF NE 19 ST Year Counts Proiections 1994 31,000 31,200 1995 29,500 32,700 1996 38,500 34,200 1997 34,000 35,700 1998 41,000 37,200 1999 35,500 38,700 2000 40,200 g: t27671exceAhistonc counts Traffic Volume Projections State Facilities in Downtown Miami SUMMARY OUTPUT Regression Statistics Multiple R - F6 -4 R Square 0.41 Adjusted R Square 0.26 Standard Error 3752.78 Observations 6 ANOVA of SS MS F Significance F Regression 1 39375000 39375000 2.795857988 0.16982563 Residual 4 56333333.33 14083333.33 Total 5 95708333.33 intercept -2959833.334 1791031.311 -1.652586035 0.173758943 -7932543.752 2012877.084 -7932543.752 2012877.084 X Variable 1 1500 897.0852272 1.672081932 0.16982563 -990.7130467 3990.713047 -990.7130467 3990.713047 Print Date: September 11, 2000 Florida Department of Transportation Transp ion Statistics Office 1999 Annual Average Daily Tratric Report County : 87 DADE AADT "WO I'D" „T" Site Site Tye Description Direction 1 Direction 2 Two -Way Factor Factor Factor 5049 P SR 5/US-1, 100 FEET NNE 11 ST N 23,000 S 20,500 43,500 C 9.05 F 52.71 F 2.83 A Site type: T = Telemetered; P = Portable AADT Flags: C = Computed; E = Manual Estimate; F = First Year Est; S = Second Year Est; T = Third Year Est; X = Unknown "K/D" Flags: A = Actual; F = Volume Fctr Catg; D = Dist/Functional Class, S = State-wide Default; W = One -Way Road "T' Flags: A= Actual; F = Axle Fctr Catg; D = Dist/Functional Class; S = State-wide Default; X = Cross -Reference Page 1 PrintDate: September 11, 2000 County: 87 - DADE Site 5049 Florida Department of Transportation Transportation Statistics Office Historical AADT Report Year AADT Direction 1 Direction 2 1999 C 43,500 N 23,000 S 20,500 1998 C 44,000 N 21,500 S 22,500 1997 C 39,000 N21,000 S 18,000 1996 C 38,000 N 19,500 S 18,500 1995 C 34,000 N 18,000 S 16,000 1994 C 38,500 N 22,000 S 16,500 1993 C 43,000 N 23,000 S 20,000 1991 43,849 N 22,472 S 21,377 1990 39,427 N21,111 S 18,316 1989 40,446 N21,292 S 19,154 1988 37,451 N 19,715 S 17,736 Subo tted lntO the Public recOr+d� d in connpcton with on CitY Clerk AADT Flags: C = Computed; E = Manual Estimate; F = First Year Est; S = Second Year Est; T = Third Year Est; X = Unknown PrintDate: September 11, 2000 Florida Department of Transportation Trans, ition Statistics Office 1999 Annual erage Daily Traffic Report County : 87 DADE AADT "K#I #vD" "T" Site Site Type Description Direction 1 Direction Two -Way Factor Factor Factor 5052 P SR 5/US-1, 100 FEET S NE 13 ST N 20,500 S 20,500 41,000 C 9.05 F 52.71 F 3.13 F c I a n� 0 Site type: T = Telemetered; P = Portable AADT Flags: C = Computed; E = Manual Estimate; F = First Year Est; S = Second Year Est; T = Third Year Est; X = Unknown "K/D" Flags: A = Actual; F = Volume Fctr Catg; D = Dist/Functional Class; S = State-wide Default; W = One -Way Road " T' Flags: A = Actual; F = Axle Fctr Catg; D = Dist/Functional Class; S = State-wide Default; X = Cross -Reference Page 1 Print Date: September 11, 2000 Florida Department of Transportation Transportation Statistics Office Historical AADT Report County: 87 - DADE Site Year AADT Direction 1 Direction 2 5052 1999 C 41,000 N 20,500 S 20,500 1998 C 43,500 N 22,500 S 21,000 1997 C 39,000 N 20,000 S 19,000 1996 C 37,500 N 20,000 S 17,500 1995 C 33,000 N 16,000 S 17,000 1994 C 36,500 N 16,500 S 20,000 1993 C 43,000 N 21,500 S 21,500 1992 C 43,500 N 23,500 S 20,000 1991 41,169 N21,159 S 20,010 1990 47,721 N23,136 S 24,585 1989 47,091 N 20,248 S 26,843 1988 51,733 N 22,244 S 29,489 1987 37,233 N 21,089 S 16,144 1986 39,646 N 0 S 0 1985 42,244 N 21,711 S 20,533 1976 41,822 N 0 S 0 SUbr* d intra the Public t on n_ h W440 Oy Clerk 01- 199 AADT Flags: C = Computed; E = Manual Estimate; F = First Year Est; S = Second Year Est; T= Third Year Est; X = Unknown Print Date: September 11, 2000 Florida Department of Transportation Transp `.ion Statistics Office 1999 Annual A. erage Daily Traffic Report County : 87 DADE AADT "g„ I'D„ 'IT„ Site Site Type Description Direction 1 Direction 2 Two -Way Factor Factor Factor 5053 P SR 5/US-1, 100 FEET NNE 13 ST N 21,500 S 15,500 37,000 C 9.05 F 52.71 F 3.13 F e-0 to Site type: T = Telemetered; P = Portable AADT Flags: C = Computed; E = Manual Estimate; F = First Year Est; S = Second Year Est; T = Third Year Est; X = Unknown "K/D" Flags: A = Actual; F = Volume Fetr Catg; D = Dist/Functional Class; S = State-wide Default; W = One -Way Road "T" Flags: A = Actual; F = Axle Fetr Catg; D = Dist/Functional Class; S = State-wide Default; X = Cross -Reference Page 1 PrintDate: September 11, 2000 Florida Department of Transportation Transportation Statistics Office Historical AADT Report County: 87 - DADE Site Year AADT Direction 1 Direction 2 5053 1999 C 37,000 N 21,500 S 15,500 1998 C 41,500 N 21,000 S 20,500 1997 C 35,000 N 20,000 S 15,000 1996 C 32,500 N 18,500 S 14,000 1995 C 28,000 N 16,000 S 12,000 1994 C 40,500 N 22,500 S 18,000 1993 C 53,000 N 26,000 S 27,000 1992 C 44,500 N 21,500 S 23,000 1991 37,064 N 0 S 0 1990 35,703 N 0 S 0 1989 42,527 N 0 S 0 1988 40,459 N 0 S 0 1987 36,571 N 0 S 0 1986 35,808 N 0 S 0 1985 36,400 N 0 S 0 1976 28,423 N 0 S 0 dEtkil. !�'etn? ��.1��q�i �� in necllfon at=e#'h on Walter Foerr an City Clerk 01- 199 AADT Flags: C = Computed; E = Manual Estimate; F = First Year Est; S = Second Year Est; T = Third Year Est; X = Unknown Print Date: September 11, 2000 Florida Department of Transportation Transp `ion Statistics Office 1999 Annual A. _:age Daily Traffic Report County : 87 DADE AADT ��K" "D" "T" Site Site Type Description Direction 1 Direction 2 Two-Wav Factor Factor Factor 5056 P SR 5/US-1, 200 FEET N NE 19 ST N 18,000 S 17,500 35,500 C 9.05 F 52.71 F 3.13 F Ky 0 : Site type: T = Telemetered; P = Portable AADT Flags: C = Computed; E = Manual Estimate; F = First Year Est; S = Second Year Est; T = Third Year Est; X = Unknown "K/D" Flags: A = Actual; F = Volume Fctr Catg; D = Dist/Functional Class; S = State-wide Default; W = One -Way Road "T" Flags: A = Actual; F = Axle Fctr Catg; D = Dist/Functional Class; S = State-wide Default, X = Cross -Reference Page 1 Q Site type: T = Telemetered; P = Portable AADT Flags: C = Computed; E = Manual Estimate; F = First Year Est; S = Second Year Est; T = Third Year Est; X = Unknown "K/D" Flags: A = Actual; F = Volume Fctr Catg; D = Dist/Functional Class; S = State-wide Default; W = One -Way Road "T" Flags: A = Actual; F = Axle Fctr Catg; D = Dist/Functional Class; S = State-wide Default, X = Cross -Reference Page 1 Print Date: September 11, 2000 Florida Department of Transportation Transportation Statistics Office Historical AADT Report County: 87 - DADE Site Year AADT Direction 1 Direction 2 5056 1999 C 35,500 N 18,000 S 17,500 1998 C 41,000 N 23,000 S 18,000 1997 C 34,000 N 17,500 S 16,500 1996 C 38,500 N 15,000 S 23,500 1995 C 29,500 N 14,500 S 15,000 1994 C 31,000 N 16,000 S 15,000 1993 C 37,000 N 19,000 S 18,000 1992 C 34,000 N 0 S 0 1991 33,484 N 0 S 0 1990 31,877 N 0 S 0 1989 38,882 N 0 S 0 1988 34,807 N 0 S 0 1987 33,938 N 0 S 0 1986 34,330 N 0 S 0 1985 34,286 N 0 S 0 1976 28,461 N 0 S 0 Slub'Ditted into pubjlr re in ct•,333� ;nx,.P °.: 4 n on . Welber FC►ot'i an City Clerk ®1- 199 AADT Flags: C = Computed; E = Manual Estimate; F = First Year Est; S = Second Year Est; T = Third Year Est; X = Unknown PROP MIRAMAR CFMTRF MITIICC renne. ar.�..............�..�.........� 19th ST 181h ST 1791 Tw 1791 ST eth ST 59t ST 5th ST lth ST 101 ST Public I with Note: Votumrs induds prowlh hom 2000 b 2003 pus thr Pwfwmanea Arts C~ traf5oWs' `w r Fooman an (per th. newt) p:127671rrcM/unur wifMuf Pro/rof haffic 01- 199 City clerk u Bap„ APPENDIX D: Existing (2000) Traffic Performance Calculation sup. coq Un Z2:x Midler Foran City Clerk 01— i99 Miramar Center Phases II and III Existing Conditions - PM Peak Hour Analysis Existing Signal Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.101 - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters 1 - Biscayne Blvd @ NE 13th ST 09/22/00 15:24:18 APPLABELS SB WB NB EB GRADES 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 PEDLEVELS 0 0 0 0 PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 20 20 20 20 BUSVOLUMES 18 10 5 5 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 0 UPSTREAMVC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS STARTUPLOST ENDGAIN IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS RT TH LT 0 1084 0 0.0 36.0 0.0 0 3 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.84 0.84 0.84 4 4 3 NO NO YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 5224 0 Phasing Parameters RT TH LT 0 338 354 0.0 24.0 24.0 0 2 2 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.95 0.95 0.95 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3651 3614 SEQUENCES 31 ALL 0 PERMISSIVES YES YES YES OVERLAPS NO NO NO CYCLES 80 150 10 GREENTIMES 8.00 75.00 19.00 YELLOWTIMES 3.00 5.00 5.00 CRITICALS 0 0 0 EXCESS 0 5.0 5.0 YES NO RT TH LT 0 1904 129 0.0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.97 0.97 0.97 4 4 3 NO NO YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3688 1863 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME RT TH LT 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.90 0.90 0.90 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 0 0 NONE NONE 0.00 1 0.0 0 Subi ted Into the public record in conne n with Watter Fran 01- 199 Cita OAerk Miramar Center Phases II and III 09/22/00 Existing Conditions - PM Peak Hour Analysis 15:24:26 Existing Signal Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.10] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 1 - Biscayne Blvd @ NE 13th ST Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.58 Vehicle Delay 10.5 Level of Service B+ ------------------------------------- Sq 31 1 Phase 1 1 Phase 2 1 Phase 3 1 **/** ------------------------------------- I + • I I + I I + { <++++1 1 I I v I ++++{ 1 I AI v North I <+ + l <+ + I I I I ++ I ++ 1 I { + + l + + I I ------------------------------------- I G/C=0.070 I G/C=0.652 I G/C=0.165 I I G= 8.0" 1 G= 75.0" I G= 19.0" I 1 Y+R= 3.0" l Y+R= 5.0" I Y+R= 5.0" 1 1 OFF= 0.0% 1 OFF= 9.6% I OFF=79.1% I ------------------------------------- C=115 sec G=102.0 sec = 88.7% Y=13.0 sec = 11.3% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% ------------------------------------ I Lane (Width/I g/C I ------------------------------------------ Service Ratel AdJ I I HCM I L 190% Maxl I Group I Lanesl Reqd Used ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I @C (vph) @E IVolumel v/c I Delay I S I Queue I SB Approach 4.3 A I TH 1 36/3 10.336 10.652 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 3407 1 3407 1 1290 10.379 1 4.3 1 A 1 242 ftl NB Approach 1.9 A I TH 1 24/2 10.541 10.748 12758 12758 1 1963 10.712 1 1.7 1 A 1 400 ftl I LT 1 12/1 10.000 10.070 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 360 1 385 1 133 10.345 1 4.2 1 A 1 50 ftl WB Approach 46.3 D I NTH 1 24/2 10.261 10.165 1 1 I 593 1 356 10.590 1 45.9 1 D 1 240 ftl I LT 1 24/2 10.264 10.165 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I 1 1 587 I 373 10.625 1 46.7 I D 1 252 ftl Subrnitted Into the public In connection with i on- / /�/ City Clerk 01- 199 Miramar Center Phases II and III Existing Conditions - PM Peak Hour Analysis Existing Signal Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.10] - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters 2 - Biscayne Blvd @ NE 14th ST 09/22/00 08:57:09 APPLABELS SB WB NB EB GRADES 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 PEDLEVELS 0 0 0 0 PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 20 20 20 20 BUSVOLUMES 18 10 5 5 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 0 UPSTREAMVC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS STARTUPLOST ENDGAIN IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS RT TH LT 44 1121 67 0.0 24.0 12.0 • 0 2 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.93 0.93 0.93 4 4 3 NO NO YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3571 110 Phasing Parameters RT TH LT 27 19 44 0.0 12.0 12.0 0 1 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.74 0.74 0.74 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 1718 1403 SEQUENCES 11 ALL 41 50 PERMISSIVES YES YES YES YES OVERLAPS NO NO NO NO CYCLES 80 150 10 0.78 GREENTIMES 71.00 35.00 10.00 38.00 YELLOWTIMES 5.00 4.00 0.00 0.00 CRITICALS 0 0 0 0 EXCESS 0 2.0 2.0 1900 RT TH LT 70 2318 55 0.0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.97 0.97 0.97 4 4 3 NO NO YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3672 378 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME RT TH LT 41 50 30 12.0 12.0 12.0 1 1 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.78 0.78 0.78 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0. 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 1552 1961 1405 NONE NONE 0.00 1 0.0 0 Sufted into the public In COtrS`[Qor We,! r Fooman City, Clerk 01- 199 Miramar Center Phases II and III 09/22/00 Existing Conditions - PM Peak Hour Analysis 08:57:17 Existing Signal Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.101 - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 2 - Biscayne Blvd @ NE 14th ST Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.85 Vehicle Delay 42.2 Level of Service D+ ------------------------- Sq 11 1 Phase 1 I Phase 2 1 **/** ------------------------- + + + 1 l +> i <++++1 I I v I ^ ++++I I 1++++ v I North I <+ + +>1++++> 1 I + + + 1++++ 1 1 + + + 1 v I ------------------------- G/C=0.617 I G/C=0.304 I i G= 71.0" I G= 35.011 1 I Y+R= 5.0" 1 Y+R= 4.0" 1 OFF= 0.0% l OFF=66.1% l ------------------------- SubrWtted into the public record in connection with ice, m=21, Matter Foeman City Clerk C=115 sec G=106.0 sec = 92.2% Y= 9.0 sec = 7.8% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I Lane iWidth/I g/C I Service Ratel Adj I I HCH I L 190* Maxi I Group I Lanes) Reqd ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Used I @C (vph) @E IVolumel v/c I Delay I S I Queue I SB Approach 15.6 B I TH+RTI 24/2 10.405 10.617 1 2205 1 2205 1 1252 10.568 1 8.0 1 A 1 387 ftl I LT 1 12/1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10.846 10.617 1 45 1 59 1 72 11.059 1 148.3 1 F 1 45 ft) NB Approach 57.6 E+ I TH+RTI 24/2 10.652 10.617 1 2267 1 2267 1 2462 11.086 1 58.7 1 E+l 761 ftl I LT 1 12/1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10.313 10.617 1 188 1 233 1 57 10.245 1 10.5 1 B+I 35 ftl WB Approach 29.1 C I TH+RTI 12/1 10.236 10.304 1 295 1 523 1 62 10.119 1 29.0 1 C 1 70 ft) I LT 1 12/1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10.239 10.304 1 236 1 422 1 59 10.138 1 29.2 1 C 1 66 ftl EB Approach 28.8 C I RT 1 12/1 10.235 10.304 1 264 1 470 1 53 10.112 1 28.9 1 C 1 60 ft) I TH 1 12/1 10.234 10.304 1 341 1 597 1 64 10.107 1 28.8 1 C 1 72 ftl I LT 1 12/1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10.232 10.304 1 237 1 423 1 38 10.089 1 28.7 1 C 1 43 ftl 01- 199 Miramar Center Phases II and III Existing Conditions Optimum Split - PM Peak Hour Analysis Existing Signal Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.001 - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters 2 - Biscayne Blvd @ NE 14th ST 10/23/00 11:44:29 APPLABELS SB WB NB EB GRADES 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 PEDLEVELS 0 0 0 0 PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 20 20 20 20 BUSVOLUMES 18 10 5 5 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 0 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS RT TH IT 44 1121 67 0.0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.93 0.93 0.93 4 4 3 NO NO YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3571 1863 Phasing Parameters RT TH LT 27 19 44 0.0 12.0 12.0 0 1 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.74 0.74 0.74 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 1718 1403 SEQUENCES 41 ALL 70 2318 PERMISSIVES YES YES YES YES OVERLAPS NO NO NO NO CYCLES 80 150 10 0.97 GREENTIMES 7.00 76.00 20.00 38.00 YELLOWTIMES 3.00 5.00 4.00 0.00 CRITICALS 0 0 0 0 EXCESS 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 RT TH LT 70 2318 55 0.0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.97 0.97 0.97 4 4 3 NO NO YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3672 1863 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME RT TH LT 41 50 30 12.0 12.0 12.0 1 1 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.78 0.78 0.78 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 1552 1961 1405 NONE NONE 0.00 1 0.0 0 SubtRitted Into the public reCOV in connection with lim P - -a'2 / s Waiter Fooman 01. 199 City Clerk Miramar Center Phases II and III 10/23/00 Existing Conditions Optimum Split - PM Peak Hour Analysis 11:44:39 Existing Signal Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.001 - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int #. 2 - Biscayne Blvd @ HE 14th ST Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.79 Vehicle Delay 22.7 Level of Service C+ --------------- Sq 41 1 Phase 1 --------------------- 1 Phase 2 1 Phase 3 1 **/** ------------------------------------- n + I + + + I ++++1 /I\ I +> 1<+ + +> I <++++1 1 I I v I ++++I 1 1 I 1++++ v 1 North I <+ I <+ + +>I++++> 1 1 1 + ( + + + I ++++ I �LDa�tts�[}$aC I + I + + + I v I recow in cwnecdc n with on 1 G/C=0.061 1 G/C=0.661 1 G/C=0.174 I� Ii�e�r ��rnaR 1 G= 7.0" { G= 76.0" 1 G= 20.0" 1 Clerk Y+R= 3.0" 1 Y+R= 5.0" I Y+R= 4.0" 1 OFF= 0.0% I OFF= 8.7% 1 OFF=79.1% ------------------------------------- C=115 sec G=103.0 sec = 89.6% Y=12.0 sec = 10.4% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I Lane (Width/I . g/C I Service Ratel Adj I I HCM I L 190% Maxi I Group I Lanesl ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Reqd Used I @C (vph) @E 1Volumel v/c I Delay I S I Queue I SB Approach 6.4 A 1 TH+RT1 24/2 10.405 10.661 1 2360 1 2360 1 1252 10.531 1 5.0 1 A 1 343 ft1 I LT 1 12/1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10.036 10.061 1 101 1 163 1 72 10.398 1 31.5 1 C 1 78 ftl NB Approach 29.2 C --------------------------------------------------- I TH+RTI 24/2.10.652 10.661 1 2427 1 2427 1 2462 - 11.014 1 29.8 1 C 1 675 ftl I LT 1 12/1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10.000 10.061 1 357 1 384 1 57 10.148 1 3.9 1 A 1 25 ft1 WB Approach 41.3 D+ -------------------------------------- I TH+RT1 12/1 10.236 10.174 --- 1 1 1 277 1 62 10.207 1 41.1 1 D+1 83 ftl I LT 1 12/1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10.239 10.174 1 1 1 2211 59 10.242 1 41.51 D+1 79 ft1 EB Approach 40.8 D+ ----------------------------------------- I RT 1 12/1 10.235 10.174 1 1 1 248 I 53 10.196 1 41.0 1 D+1 71 ft1 I TH 1 12/1 10.234 10.174 1 1 1 320 1 64 10.188 1 40.8 I D+1 85 ftl I LT 1 12/1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10.232 10.174 1 1 1 221 1 38 10.156 1 40.6 1 D+1 51 ftl 01— 199 Miramar Center Phases II and III 09/22/00 Existing Conditions - PM Peak Hour Analysis 15:14:33 Existing Signal Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.10] - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # 3 - Biscayne Blvd @ NE 15th ST METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS SB WB NB EB GRADES 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 PEDLEVELS 0 0 0 0 PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 20 20 20 20 BUSVOLUMES 18 10 5 5 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 0 UPSTREAMVC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS STARTUPLOST ENDGAIN IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS RT TH LT 3 1187 83 0.0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.92 0.92 0.92 4 4 3 NO NO YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3590 1863 Phasing Parameters RT TH LT 42 268 76 0.0 12.0 12.0 0 1 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.91 0.91 0.91 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 1844 1863 SEQUENCES 42 ALL 128 PERMISSIVES YES YES YES OVERLAPS NO NO NO CYCLES 80 150 10 GREENTIMES 7.00 61.00 7.00 YELLOWTIMES 3.00 5.00 3.00 CRITICALS 0 0 0 EXCESS 0 5.0 5.0 YES NO RT TH LT 128 2126 14 0.0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.93 0.93 0.93 4 4 3 NO NO YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3657 1863 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME RT TH LT 1 130 19 0.0 12.0 0.0 0 1 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.89 0.89 0.89 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 1653 0 NONE NONE 0.00 1 0.0 0 24.00 5.00 Sti$a tjBd jrjj) `f 80 publIC 0 with row in CO -nn mm 240 Oi w8W` FOOMM r;,ty Clerk 01- 199 Miramar Center Phases II and III 09/22/00 Existing Conditions - PM Peak Hour Analysis 15:14:41 Existing Signal Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.10] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 3 - Biscayne Blvd @ NE 15th ST Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.97 Vehicle Delay 85.1 Level of Service F ------------------------------------------------- Sq 42 1 Phase 1 1 Phase 2 1 Phase 3 1 Phase 4 l **/** ------------------------------------------------- { + I + + + I I { + 1 + + + 1 ++++I ++++1 /{\ { +> 1<+ + +> { <++++1 <++++1 I I 1 v { ++++1 ++++{ I I I I v i++++ v 1 North I <+ I <+ + +> 1 I ++++> 840tNtted into the PubliC i I + i + + + i I ++++ fecord in tonne n with { + 1 + + + 1 I v _ ern j am_ Oar ca /Ara- r ) ---------------------------------------------- 1 G/C=0.061 I G/C=0.530 I G/C=0.061 I G/C=0.209 I"?rFor-man I G= 7.0" I G= 61.0" I G= 7.0" ( G= 24.0" I CHy Clerk Y+R= 3.0" 1 Y+R= 5.0" 1 Y+R= 3.0" I Y+R= 5.0" I 1 OFF= 0.0% 1 OFF= 8.7% 1 OFF=66.1% 1 OFF=74.8% 1 ------------------------------------------------- C=115 sec G= 99.0 sec = 86.1% Y=16.0 sec = 13.9% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% -------------------_------------------------------------------------------------ I Lane (Width/l g/C I Service Ratel Adj I I HCM I L 190% Maxl { Group I Lanesl Reqd Used I @C (vph) @E IVolumel v/c I Delay i S I Queue I ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SB Approach 16.9 B I TH+RT) 24/2 10.412 10.530 11863 1 1904 1 1293 10.679 1 16.2 1 B 1 491 ftl I LT 1 12/1 10.041 10.061 1 120 1 168 1 90 10.497 1 27.7 1 C 1 78 ftl ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NB Approach 135.3 F 1 TH+RTI 24/2 10.646 10.530 11900 11940 12424 11.249 1136.1 1 F 1 920 ftl I LT 1 12/1 10.000 10.061 1 218 1 260 1 15 10.058 I 10.8 1 B+l 25 ftl ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WB Approach 35.8 D+ I TH+RT) 12/1 10.312 10.296 1 294 1 545 1 341 10.626 1 37.3 1 D+1 388 ftl I LT 1 12/1 10.027 10.061 1 183 1 318 1 84 10.255 1 29.7 1 C 1 93 ftl ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- EB Approach 41.4 D+ (LT+TH+RT1 12/1 10.268 10.209 1 1 1 316 I 168 10.503 1 41.4 I D+I 215 ftl ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0 - 199 Miramar Center Phases II and III Existing Conditions Optimum Split - PM Peak Hour Analysis Existing Signal Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.001 - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS GRADES PEDLEVELS PARKINGSIDES PARKVOLUMES BUSVOLUMES RIGHTTURNONREDS Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS 3 - Biscayne Blvd @ NE 15th ST 10/23/00 12:02:39 SB WB NB EB 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 NONE NONE NONE NONE 20 20 20 20 18 10 5 5 0 0 0 0 RT TH LT 3 1187 83 0.0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.92 0.92 0.92 4 4 3 NO NO YES 5.0 5.0 3.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3590 1863 Phasing Parameters RT TH IT 42 268 76 0.0 12.0 12.0 0 1 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.91 0.91 0.91 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 1844 1002 SEQUENCES 21 ALL PERMISSIVES YES YES YES OVERLAPS NO NO NO CYCLES 115 115 10 GREENTIMES 5.06 71.75 26.18 YELLOWTIMES 3.00 5.00 4.00 CRITICALS 3 8 5 EXCESS 0 YES NO RT TH LT 128 2126 14 0.0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.93 0.93 0.93 4 4 3 NO NO YES 5.0 5.0 3.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3657 419 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME RT TH LT 1 130 19 0.0 12.0 0.0 0 1 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.89 0.89 0.89 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 1176 0 NONE NONE 0.00 1 0.0 0 Subrrottled hyto the, publ[C re In OOrtnevwn withit8�nOn Q4 22 -A-4 W&Wr r0oiman City Clerk 01- 199 Miramar Center Phases II and III 10/23/00 Existing Conditions Optimum Split - PM Peak Hour Analysis 12:01:11 Existing Signal Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.001 - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 3 - Biscayne Blvd @ NE 15th ST Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.84 Vehicle Delay 35.2 Level of Service D+ ------------------------------------- Sq 21 1 Phase 1 I Phase 2 1 Phase 3 1 **/**------------------------------------- + + I+++ 1 1 I ++ 1 +++ 1 ****l /1\ 1<+ + *> 1<+ + +> 1 <****1 v 1 v 1 ++++1 North I I <+ * * > I ++++> 1 Subw fitted into the pubiie I I I + * * I ++++ i record in oonno0ion with I 1 + * * I v I M) A:2- on =�Z ka,7 4411 ------------------------------------- 1 G/C=0.044 1 G/C=0.624 ( G/C=0.228 1 `)Man G= I G= 5.1" 1 G= 71.8" 1 G= 26.2" 1 ?! Clerk Y+R= 3.0" I Y+R= 5.0" I Y+R= 4.0" I OFF= 0.0% I OFF= 7.0% ( OFF=73.8% i ------------------------------------- C=115 sec G=103.0 sec = 89.6% Y=12.0 sec = 10.4% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 Lane (Width/I. • g/C I Service Ratel Adj I I HCM I L 190% Max) I Group I Lanesl Reqd Used ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I @C (vph) @E 1Volumel v/c I Delay I S I Queue I SB Approach 5.3 A I TH+RTI 24/2 10.412 10.694 1 2492 1 2492 1 1293 10.519 1 3.1 1 A 1 320 ftl 1 LT 1 12/1 10.045 10.044 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 89 1 135 1 90 10.600 1 35.7 I*D+l 92 ftI NB Approach 48.8 D ------------------------------------------- i TH+RT1 24/2 10.646 10.624 - 1 2282 1 2282 1 2424 11.062 1 49.1 I*D 1 737 ftl 1 LT 1 12/1 10.241 10.624 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 215 1 262 1 15 10.057 1 8.5 1 A 1 25 ftl WB Approach 50.6 D ------------------------------------------- I TH+RT1 12/1 10.312 10.228 1 33 1 408 1 341 10.812 1 53.6 I*D 1 426 ftl I IT 1 12/1 10.261 10.228 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 17 1 208 1 84 10.368 1 38.4 1 D+1 105 ftl EB Approach 44.6 D+ --------------------------------------------- ILT+TH+RTI 12/1 10.289 10.228 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 20 1 249 1 168 10.627 1 44.6 1 D+1 210 ftl 01- 199 Miramar Center Phases II and III 09/22/00 Existing Conditions - PM Peak Hour Analysis 09:16:13 Existing Signal Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.10] - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # 4 - Biscayne Blvd @ NE 17th ST METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS SB WB NB EB GRADES 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 PEDLEVELS 0 0 0 0 PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 20 20 20 20 BUSVOLUMES 18 10 5 5 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 0 UPSTREAMVC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS STARTUPLOST ENDGAIN IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS RT TH LT 41 1367 0 0.0 24.0 0.0 0 2 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.92 0.92 0.92 4 4 3 NO NO YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 1469 0 3433 Phasing Parameters RT TH LT 2 1 1 12.0 12.0 12.0 1 1 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.50 0.50 0.50 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM DOPT NORM 1520 5085 1770 SEQUENCES 17 ALL 28 PERMISSIVES YES YES YES OVERLAPS NO NO NO CYCLES 80 150 10 GREENTIMES 68.00 16.00 17.00 YELLOWTIMES 5.00 4.00 5.00 CRITICALS 0 0 0 EXCESS 0 5.0 5.0 YES NO RT TH LT 0 1799 41 0.0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.86 0.86 0.86 4 4 3 NO NO YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 1552 1804 0 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME RT TH LT 28 1 23 0.0 12.0 0.0 0 1 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.72 0.72 0.72 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM DOPT NORM 1552 5085 1770 NONE NONE 0.00 1 0.0 0 Submitted into the public record in connection with i ern ow:1r, ? t Wafter R eman Cay Clerk 01- 199 Miramar Center Phases II and III 09/22/00 Existing Conditions - PM Peak Hour Analysis 09:16:39 Existing Signal Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.10] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 4 - Biscayne Blvd @ NE 17th ST Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.84 Vehicle Delay 20.1 Level of Service C+ ------------------------------------- Sq 17 1 Phase 1 I Phase 2 1 Phase 3 1 **/* ------------------------------------- I + + 1 1 I 1 + + /1\ 1<+ + I <++++I I I I v I ++++I AI I I I v 1++++ 1 North 1 <+ + 1 I++++> 1 I I ++ I 1++++ 1 I+ + v I I------ I ------------------------- ----- 1 G/C=0.591 I G/C=0.139 I G/C=0.148 I I G= 68.0" 1 G= 16.0" 1 G= 17.0" 1 I Y+R= 5.0" I Y+R= 4.0" I Y+R= 5.0" I I OFF= 0.0% I OFF --63.5% 1 OFF=80.9% 1 ------------------------------------- Subs witted int0 the public reco n connection with i-rn on Wst' zr FoGman City Clerk C=115 sec G=101.0 sec = 87.8% Y=14.0 sec = 12.2% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I Lane (Width/I g/C I Service Ratel Adj I I HCM I L 190% Maxl I Group I Lanesl Reqd Used I @C (vph) @E IVolumel v/c I Delay I S I Queue I ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SB Approach 12.2 B+ I TH+RTI 24/2 10.460 10.591 1 2114 1 2114 1 1531 10.724 1 12.2 I B+1 506 ftl ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NB Approach 24.8 C+ I TH 1 24/2 10.569 10.591 1 2181 1 2181 1.2092 10.959 1 25.0 1 C+I 691 ftI I LT 1 12/1 10.388 10.591 1 96 1 124 1 48 10.364 1 13.9 1 B+1 32 ftI ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WB Approach 42.7 D+ I RT 1 12/1 10.221 10.139 1 1 1 186 1 4 10.019 1 42.8 I D+1 25 ftl I TH 112/1 10.220 10.139 1 1 1 248 1 2 10.007 1 42.7 1 D+1 25 ft) I LT 1 12/1 10.220 10.139 1 1 1 234 1 2 10.008 1 42.7 1 D+1 25 ft1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- EB Approach 44.6 D+ ILT+TH+RTI 12/1 10.241 10.148 1 1 1 205 1 72 10.313 1 44.6 1 D+1 99 ft) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 01- 199 Miramar Center Phases II and III 09/22/00 Existing Conditions - PM Peak Hour Analysis 15:21:14 Existing Signal Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.10] - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # 5 - Biscayne Blvd @ NE 17th Terrac METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS SB WB NB EB GRADES 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 PEDLEVELS 0 0 0 0 PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 20 20 20 20 BUSVOLUMES 18 10 5 5 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 0 UPSTREAMVC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS STARTUPLOST ENDGAIN IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS RT TH LT 9 1338 274 0..0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.91 0.91 0.91 4 4 3 NO NO YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3588 1863 Phasing Parameters RT TH LT 132 18 59 0.0 12.0 12.0 0 1 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.94 0.94 0.94 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 1634 1440 SEQUENCES 21 ALL 123 PERMISSIVES YES YES YES OVERLAPS NO NO NO CYCLES 80 150 10 GREENTIMES 18.00 65.00 18.00 YELLOWTIMES 5.00 4.00 5.00 CRITICALS 0 0 0 EXCESS 0 5.0 5.0 YES NO RT TH LT 123 1732 10 0.0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.87 0.87 0.87 4 4 3 NO NO YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3652 1863 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME RT TH LT 5 11 6 0.0 12.0 0.0 0 1 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.63 0.63 0.63 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 1513 0 Submitted bats the public record In c0nne with inn Z-; ri «o Wafter 1=0wan City Clerk 01- 199 NONE NONE 0.00 1 0.0 0 Miramar Center Phases II and III 09/22/00 Existing Conditions - PM Peak Hour Analysis 15:21:21 Existing Signal Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.101 - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 5 - Biscayne Blvd @ NE 17th Terrac Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.81 Vehicle Delay 30.1 Level of Service C ------------------------------------- Sq 21 1 Phase 1 1 Phase 2 1 Phase 3 1 **/** ------------------------------------- /1\ I<+ + +> 1<+ + +> 1 <++++1 I I v I v I ^ ++++1 I I i ^ 1++++ v 1 North 1 1 <+ + +>1++++> I I I + + + I ++++ I Submitted int0 the public 1 I + + + 1 v record jPt c0�;" I G/C=0.157 I G/C=0.565 1 G/C=0.157 1 1P I �C ft 1 G= 18.0" 1 G= 65.0" 1 G= 18.0" I City CI@lePIC I Y+R= 5.0" l Y+R= 4.0" 1 Y+R= 5.0" 1 1 OFF= 0.0% I OFF --20.0% I OFF --80.0% I ------------------------------------- C=115 sec G=101.0 sec = 87.8% Y=14.0 sec = 12.2% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I Lane jWidth/l g/C I Service Ratel Adj i I HCH I L 190% Maxl I Group I Lanesl Reqd Used ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I @C (vph) @E IVolumel v/c I Delay I S I Queue I SB Approach 9.8 A I TH+RTI 24/2 10.448 10.765 1 2745 1 2745 1 1480 10.539 1 0.8 1 A 1 281 ftl I LT 1 12/1 10.227 10.157 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 206 1 350 1 301 10.836 1 54.0 1 D 1 300 ftl NB Approach 45.0 D+ I TH+RT1 24/2 10.582 10.565 1 2055 j 2064 1 2132 11.033 1 45.2 1 D 1749 ftl 1 LT 1 12/1 10.240 10.565 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 150 1 191 1 11 10.056 1 11.3 1 B+I 25 ft) WB Approach 48.1 D I TH+RTI 12/1 10.264 10.157 1 1 1 232 1 159 10.621 1 49.9 I D 1 217 ftl I LT 1 12/1 10.240 10.157 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 1 1 201 1 63 10.280 1 43.5 j D+1 86 ftj EB Approach 42.2 D+ (LT+TH+RT1 12/1 10.230 10.157 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 1 1 213 1 35 10.148 1 42.2 1 D+l 48 ftl 01- � Miramar Center Phases II and IIZ 09/25/00 Existing Conditions - PM Peak Hour Analysis 08:37:23 Existing Signal Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.101 - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # 6 - Biscayne Blvd @ NE 19th ST METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS SB WB NB EB GRADES 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 PEDLEVELS 0 0 0 0 PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARRVOLUMES 20 20 20 20 BUSVOLUMES 18 10 5 5 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 0 UPSTREAMVC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS STARTUPLOST ENDGAIN IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS RT TH LT 1 1552 15 0.0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.90 0.90 0.90 4 4 3 NO NO YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3591 111 Phasing Parameters SEQUENCES 11 ALL PERMISSIVES YES YES OVERLAPS NO NO CYCLES 80 150 GREENTIMES 80.00 25.00 YELLOWTIMES 5.00 5.00 CRITICALS 0 0 EXCESS 0 3 RT TH LT 78 86 41 12.0 12.0 0.0 1 1 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.92 0.92 0.92 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 1748 1134 YES YES NO NO 10 RT TH LT 4 1876 13 0.0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.87 0.87 0.87 4 4 3 NO NO YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3687 244 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME RT TH LT 23 79 32 0.0 12.0 0.0 0 1 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.91 0.91 0.91 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 1502 0 NONE NONE 0.00 1 0.0 0 S%db"Otted ir" thO Public lec,DLn s�rt��aftn with City Clerk 01-- 199 Miramar Center Phases II and III 09/25/00 Existing Conditions - PM Peak Hour Analysis 08:37:53 Existing Signal Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.10] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 6 - Biscayne Blvd @ NE 19th ST Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.74 Vehicle Delay 8.8 Level of Service A ------------------------- Sq 11 1 Phase 1 1 Phase 2 1 **/** ------------------------- 1 + + + { A1 I i v I ++++{ I I i++++ v 1 North I <+ + +>1++++> 1 { + + + 1 v 1 ------------------------- I G/C=0.696 I G/C=0.217 I 1 G= 80.0" I G= 25.0" 1 1 Y+R= 5.0" I Y+R= 5.0" 1 { OFF= 0.0% i OFF --73.9% I ------------------------- C=115 sec G=105.0 sec = 91.3% Y=10.0 sec = Subaeited into the public record In conn.�n on 8.7% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 Lane (Width/I g/C I Service Ratel Adj I I HCH I L 190% Maxi I Group 1 Lanesl Reqd ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Used I @C (vph) @E iVolumel v/c I Delay I S I Queue I SB Approach 4.4 A I TH+RTI 24/2 10.500 10.696 1 2498 1 2498 1 1725 10.691 I 4.4 1 A 1 424 ftl I LT 1 12/1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10.274 10.696 1 54 1 69 1 17 10.221 I 7.7 1 A 1 25 ftl NB Approach 7.1 _ A I TH+RTI 24/2 10.584 10.696 12565 12565 12161 10.842 1 7.1 1 A 1 532 ftl I LT 1 12/1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10.265 10.696 1 136 I 167 1 15 10.088 1 5.9 1 A 1 25 ft) WB Approach 38.6 D+ I RT 1 12/1 10.245 10.217 I 1 1 313 I 85 10.258 I 37.7 1 D+I 108 ftl ILT+TH 1 12/1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10.258 10.217 1 1 1 344 I 138 10.383 1 39.1 1 D+I 175 ftl EB Approach 40.0 D+ ILT+TH+RTI 12/1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10.265 10.217 1 1 1 313 1 147 10.445 1 40.0 I D+I 186 ftl 01- 199 Miramar Center Phases II and III 09/25/00 Existing Conditions - PM Peak Hour Analysis 08:09:33 Existing Signal Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.10] - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # 7 - Bayshore @ NE 13th ST METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS SB WB - NB EB GRADES 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 PEDLEVELS 0 0 0 0 PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 20 20 20 20 BUSVOLUMES 18 10 5 5 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 0 UPSTREAMVC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUME S WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS STARTUPLOST ENDGAIN IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS RT TH LT 286 259 0 12.0 12.0 0.0 1 1 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.87 0.87 0.87 4 4 3 NO NO YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM DOPT NORM 1469 1961 0 Phasing Parameters RT TH LT 146 564 8 0.0 48.0 0.0 0 4 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.82 0.82 0.82 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 1520 3725 1863 RT TH LT 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.96 0.96 0.96 4 4 3 NO NO YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 0 0 RT TH LT 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.90 0.90 0.90 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 0 0 SEQUENCES 11 ALL PERMISSIVES YES YES YES YES LEADLAGS NONE NONE OVERLAPS NO NO NO NO OFFSET 0.00 1 CYCLES 80 150 10 PEDTIME 0.0 0 GREENTIMES 30.00 42.00 YELLOWTIMES 4.00 4.00 CRITICALS 0 0 3ubinitted into the public EXCESS 0 recogq In connection with ftm on� Walter Fowan City Clerk � � 199 Miramar Center Phases II and III 09/25/00 Existing Conditions - PM Peak Hour Analysis 08:09:42 Existing Signal Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.10] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 7 - Bayshore @ NE 13th ST Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.35 Vehicle Delay 14.8 Level of Service B+ ------------------------- Sq 11 1 Phase 1 1 Phase 2 1 */** ------------------------- I + + I I . 1 + + I ++++I /1\ 1<+ + I <++++1 I I v I ++++1 I 1 I v North I I I I I Sub avifted Into the publlc I _ recefd� In cor neefi n with I G/C=0 375 I G/C=0 525 I In -r.Q n2 /a� G= 30.0" I G= 42.0" I 1 a- %er "b=oon, an I Y+R= 4.011 1 Y+R= 4.0" I Cip/ G40rc I OFF= 0.0% I OFF --42.5% 1 ------------------------- C= 80 sec G= 72.0 sec = 90.0% Y= 8.0 sec = 10.0% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I Lane (Width/I - g/C I Service Ratel Adj I I HCH I L 190% Maxl I Group I Lanesl ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Reqd Used I @C (vph) @E IVolumel v/c I Delay I S I Queue I SB Approach 21.0 C+ I RT 112/1 10.304 10.375 I 462 1 551 1 329 10.597 I 23.2 1 C+1 231 ft1 I TH 1 12/1 10.232 10.375 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 642 I 735 I 298 10.405 1 18.6 1 B 1 209 ftl WB Approach 10.4 B+ ILT+TH+RTI 48/4 10.167 10.525 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3594 1 3594 1 876 10.244 I 10.4 I B+1 117 ft1 01-- 199 Miramar Center Phases II and III 09/25/00 Existing Conditions - PM Peak Hour Analysis 08:10:47 Existing Signal Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.10] - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # 8 - Bayshore @ NE 14th ST METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS SB WB NB EB GRADES 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 PEDLEVELS 0 0 0 0 PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 20 20 20 20 BUSVOLUMES 18 10 5 5 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 0 UPSTREAMVC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS STARTUPLOST ENDGAIN IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS RT TH LT 40 456 3 0.0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.97 0.97 0.97 4 4 3 NO NO YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3548 1863 Phasing Parameters RT TH LT 8 22 46 0.0 24.0 0.0 0 2 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.79 0.79 0.79 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 1808 1258 RT TH LT 3 117 12 0.0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.92 0.92 0.92 4 4 3 NO NO YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3675 1863 SEQUENCES 41 ALL 50 20 PERMISSIVES YES YES YES YES LEADLAGS OVERLAPS NO NO NO NO OFFSET CYCLES 80 150 10 PEDTIME GREENTIMES 10.00 38.00 19.00 YES YELLOWTIMES 3.00 5.00 5.00 4.0 CRITICALS 0 0 aSubMtte.(i 6ftt,0 the public EXCESS 0 2.0 t®Cofd in connert �h°4th 2000 2000 1.00 h P2--2Oft 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Water Foornan 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM V Cleric RT TH IT 50 20 86 0.0 24.0 0.0 0 2 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.89 0.89 0.89 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 2823 0 NONE NONE 0.00 1 0.0 0 01- 199 Miramar Center Phases II and III 09/25/00 Existing Conditions - PM Peak Hour Analysis 08:11:02 Existing Signal Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.101 - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 8 - Bayshore @ NE 14th ST Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.24 Vehicle Delay 14.6 Level of Service B+ ------------------------------------- Sq 41 1 Phase 1 1 Phase 2 1, Phase 3 1 •*/** ------------------------------------- I + I + + + I ^ I 1 + I + + + I ++++I /1\ I +> 1<+ + +> 1 <++++1 I I I v I ++++I I I I (++++ v I North I <+ I <+ + +>1++++> I I I + I +++ I++++ 1 I + I + + + l v ------------------------------------- G/C=0.125 I G/C=0.475 I G/C=0.237 i 1 G= 10.0" [ G= 38.011 [ G= 19.011 1 1 Y+R= 3.0" l Y+R= 5.0" I Y+R= 5.0" 1 I OFF= 0.0% I OFF=16.3% I OFF=70.0% 1 ------------------------------------- C= 80 sec G= 67.0 sec = 83.8% Y=13.0 sec = 16.3% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I Lane (Width/1 g/C I Service Ratel Adj I I HCM I L 190% Max[ I Group I Lanes( Reqd Used ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I @C (vph) @E 1Volumel v/c I Delay I S I Queue I SB Approach 10.8 B+ I TH+RTI 24/2 10.206 10.475 1 1658 1 1685 1 511 10.303 1 10.8 1 B+1 151 ftI I LT 1 12/1 10.000 10.125 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 896 1 919 1 3 10.003 1 4.6 1 A 1 25 ft1 NB Approach 8.9 A I TH+RT[ 24/2 10.110 10.475 1 1721 11746 1 130 10.074 1 9.3 1 A I 38 ftI I LT 1 12/1 10.000 10.125 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 632 1 659 1 13 10.020 1 4.8 1 A 1 25 ftl WB Approach 24.2 C+ ILT+TH+RTI 24/2 10.093 10.237 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 519 1 658 1 96 10.146 1 24.2 1 C+1 41 ftl EB Approach 25.1 C+ ILT+TH+RTI 24/2 10.118 10.237 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 514 1 652 1 175 10.268 1 25.1 1 C+I 75 ft[ State r tt,�,j into the. public iOn with f � on Waftor RvIRman 01— 199 1:�s'ly clerk Miramar Center Phases II and III 09/25/00 Existing Conditions - PM Peak Hour Analysis 08:12:33 Existing Signal Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.10] - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # 9 - Bayshore @ NE 15th ST METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD • 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS SB WB NB EB GRADES 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 PEDLEVELS 0 0 0 0 PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 20 20 20 20 BUSVOLUMES 18 10 5 5 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 0 UPSTREAMVC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS STARTUPLOST ENDGAIN IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS RT TH LT 43 441 20 0.0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.96 0.96 0.96 4 4 3 NO NO YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3543 1863 Phasing Parameters RT TH LT 36 303 2 12.0 12.0 12.0 1 1 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.90 0.90 0.90 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 1878 0 SEQUENCES 44 ALL 37 PERMISSIVES YES YES YES OVERLAPS NO NO NO CYCLES 80 150 10 GREENTIMES 9.00 23.00 6.00 YELLOWTIMES 3.00 5.00 3.00 CRITICALS 0 0 0 EXCESS 0 5.0 5.0 YES NO RT TH LT 37 113 7 0.0 24.0 0.0 0 2 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.83 0.83 0.83 4 4 3 NO NO YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3482 0 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME RT TH LT 26 259 63 0.0 12.0 12.0 0 1 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.88 0.88 0.88 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 1895 1863 NONE NONE 0.00 1 0.0 0 25.00 '6, o bIT14: 0,M) ire public co in connecion with On1a2,Ad Walter Foeman City Clerk 01-- 199 Miramar Center Phases II and III 09/25/00 Existing Conditions - PM Peak Hour Analysis 08:12:40 Existing Signal Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.101 - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 9 - Bayshore @ NE 15th ST Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.45 Vehicle Delay 23.3 Level of Service C+ ------------------------------------------------- Sq 44 1 Phase 1 1 Phase.2 I Phase 3 1 Phase 4 1 **/** ------------------------------------------------- 1 + /I\ I +> 1<+ + +> 1 1 <++++1 I I I v ++++I I I 1++++ v 1++++ v North I <+ { <+ + +>1 I++++> I I I + 1 + 1 + + + I i +++ 1 1++++ I 1 v Igifted into thO public ----------------------------------------------- 'VC0q In connection wit!., I G/C=0 112 I G/C=0.287 I G/C=0.075 I G/C=0.313 I IWn Z:2 12 0n I G= 9.0 " 1 G= 23.0" 1 G= 6.011 1 G= 25.011 I .�_. { Y+R= 3.0 I Y+R= 5.01, I Y+R= 3.0 I Y+R= 6.0111 I OFF= 0.0% ( OFF=15.0$ I OFF" --50.0% i OFF=61.3$ ------------------------------------------------- C= 80 sec G= 63.0 sec = 78.8% Y=17.0 sec = 21.3$ Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I Lane (Width/{ - g/C I Service Rate) Adj I i HCM I L 190% Maxi I Group I Lanes( ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Reqd Used I @C (vph) @E {Volume) We I Delay I S I Queue I SB Approach 24.7 C+ I TH+RT1 24/2 10.204 10.287 1 857 1 1019 1 504 10.495 1 25.3 I C+1 202 ft{ I LT 1 12/1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10.000 10.112 1 538 1 599 1 21 10.035 1 11.8 1 B+1 25 ftj NB Approach 21.8 1 C+ ILT+TH+RTI 24/2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10.129 10.287 1 840 1 1001 1 189 10.189 1 21.8 1 C+1 76 ftj WB Approach 23.4 C+ I RT 1 12/1 10.092 10.313 1 383 1 475 1 40 10.084 1 19.5 1 B 1 31 ftl I TH 1 12/1 10.231 10.313 1 510 1 613 1 337 10.550 1 23.9 I C+I 261 ftj I LT 1 12/1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10.000 10.075 1 342 1 402 1 2 10.005 1 12.5 1 B+1 25 ftj EB Approach 22.0 C+ I TH+RTi 12/1 10.231 10.313 1 490 1 592 1 324 10.547 1 23.9 I C+I 250 ft{ I LT 1 12/1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10.000 10.075 1 331 1 391 1 72 10.184 1 13.3 1 B+1 44 ftl 01- 199 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1g BAY&17T.HC0 Page 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 --------------------------------------------- Streets: (N -S) N.BAYSHORE DR. (E -W) NE 17TH TERR. Major Street Direction.... EW Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min). Analyst ................... HAN Date of Analysis.......... 9/22/0 Other Information ......... EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS -PM PEAK Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection ----------------------------------------------- - Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes Stop/Yield Volumes PHF Grade MCI s M SU/RV' s CV,s (�) PCE I s ------------ 0 1 < 1 N 4 440 .84 .84 0 --------------- 0 > 1 0 N' 2 126 .73 .73 0 1.10 ---------------- 1 0 1 336 46 .85 .85 0 1.10 1.10 ---------------- Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) ------------------------------------------------------------------ Left Turn Major Road 5.00 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.00 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 6.50 3.40 suhmniften into tragi pu0lic recolem connection with Warier Foem, an City Clerk 01- 199 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1g BAY&17T.HC0 Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection -------------------------------------------------------- Step 1: RT from Minor Street NB SB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 5 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1377 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1377 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.96 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 2: LT from Major Street WB EB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 529 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 959 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 959 Prob, of Queue -Free State: 1.00 TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) Major LT Shared Lane Prob. of Queue -Free State: 1.00 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 4: LT from Minor Street NB SB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 181 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 832 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 1.00 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 1.00 SW"tted into the Rub9(C Capacity Adjustment Factor recOrdin Gonne due to Impeding Movements 1.00 11 01, w'lth Movement Capacity: (pcph) 829 ------------------------------------------------------ JnrFan CiiY Clerk Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95%; Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay. Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph)(sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh) -------- ------ ------ ------------- NB L 435 829 9.1 ------- ----- 3.5 B --------- 8.3 NB R 59 1377 2.7 0.0 A WB L 3 959 3.8 0.0 A 0.1 Intersection Delay = 3.3 sec/veh 01-- 199 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1g 4AV&17TE.HCO Page 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 Streets: (N -S) NE 4TH AVE (E -W) NE 17TH TERR. Major Street Direction.... EW Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) Analyst ................... HAN Date of Analysis.......... 9/19/0 Other Information ......... EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS -PM PEAK Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection --------------------- EastboundWestbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes Stop/Yield Volumes PHF Grade MC' s (%) SU/RV's (g) CV, s (�) PCE' s 1 1 0 N 1 407 .93 .93 0 1.10 --------------- 0 1 0 N 201 .95 0 ---------------- Adjustment Factors 0 > 1 < 0 1 0 8 .56 .56 .56 0 1.10 1.10 1.10 -------------- Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) ------------------------------------------------------------------ Left Turn Major Road 5.00 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.00 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 6.50 3.40 SubrAttf,-d into the public recxac in connctita v�oth rafn on Wattar I~ooman City Clerk fly.- 199 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1g 4AV&17TE.HCO Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection -------------------------------------------------------- Step l: RT from Minor Street NB SB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 212 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1081 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1081 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.99 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 2: LT from Major Street WB EB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 212 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1359 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1359 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 1.00 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 3: TH from Minor Street NB SB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 651 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 497 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 1.00 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 497 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 1.00 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 4: LT from Minor Street NB SB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 651 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 444 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 1.00 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 1.00 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 1.00 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 444 -------------------------------------------------submi#o7i mlo too wo?l1o' mmrcL 6n ccnnt%. 41ml with Intersection Performance Summary Ws Wr Fooman Avg. Flow Move Shared Total 95%_City Clerk Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph)(sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh) ----- --------- -------- ------ ------ ------------- SB L 2 444 > ------- SB T 0 497 > 925 4.0 0.0 A 4.0 SB R 15 1081 > EB L 1 1359 2.7 0.0 A 0.0 Intersection Delay = 0.1 sec/veh 01— 1199 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1g 4WEST-18.HC0 Page 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 Streets: (N -S) NE 4TH AVE(WESTSIDE) (E -W) NE 18TH ST. Major Street Direction.... NS Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) Analyst ................... HAN Date of Analysis.......... 9/22/0 Other Information ......... EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS -PM PEAK Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection ------------------------------------ - Northbound SouthboundEastbound Westbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes Stop/Yield Volumes PHF Grade MCI s (%) SU/RV's (�) CV' s ( °s ) PCE's 0 > 1 < 0 N 48 93 2 .5 .5 .5 0 1.10 --------------- 0 > 1 0 N 2 12 .77 .77 0 1.10 --------------- 0 1 1 21 21 .64 .64 0 Adjustment Factors 1.10 1.10 0 > 2 0 2 20 .66 .66 0 1.10 1.10 --------------- Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) ------------------------------------------------------------------ Left Turn Major Road 5.00 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.00 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 6.50 3.40 Stl e tt"Dd hitt thA, public recce in connect §o11 with t atko=r Foeman City Clerk 0i- 199 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1g 4WEST-18.HC0 Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection -------------------------------------------------------- Step 1: RT from Minor Street WE EB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 16 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1359 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1359 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.97 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 2: LT from Major Street SB NB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 190 16 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1392 1684 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1392 1684 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 1.00 0.94 TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 1700 RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 Major LT Shared Lane Prob. of Queue -Free State: 1.00 0.93 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 3: TH from Minor Street WE EB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 303 305 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 756 755 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.93 0.93 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 701 700 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.95 0.95 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 4: LT from Minor Street WE EB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 336 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 676 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0.88 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.91 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.88 Movement Capacity: (pcph) -------------------------------------------------------- 597 Submilfted into the public recrsr9L,_1n connection with WaNer i✓oeman City Clerk 01- 199 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1g 4WEST-18.HC0 Page 3 Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% - Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph)(sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh) --------- -------- EB T ------ 36 ------ ------ 700 -------------- 5.4 0.0 ----- B 4.1 EB R 36 1359 2.7 0.0 A WB L 3 597 > 691 5.5 0.0 B WB T 33 701 > 5.5 NB L 106 1684 2.3 0.1 A 0.8 SB L 3 1392 2.6 0.0 A 0.4 Intersection Delay = 1.8 sec/veh Subrotted into the puLlir re In cojjrp., innL on Wafter Foeman Gty Clerk 01- 199 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1g 4EAST-18.HC0 Page 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 Streets: (N -S) NE 4TH AVE(EASTSIDE) (E -W) NE 18TH ST Major Street Direction.... EW Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) Analyst ................... HAN Date of Analysis.......... 9/22/0 Other Information ......... EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS -PM PEAK Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection ---- ------------------------ EastboundWestbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes Stop/Yield Volumes PHF Grade MC' s M) ) SU/RV'S (%) CV' s ( % ) PCE 's 0 1 0 N 22 .66 0 -------------- Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) ------------------------------------------------------------------ Left Turn Major Road 5.00 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.00 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 6.50 3.40 recofo, in con{3ecz: jn ,A4'. on . { emr Foanan Utyy Clerk 91- 199 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1g 4EAST-18.HC0 Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection -------------------------------------------------------- Step 1: RT from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 30 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1337 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1337 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.99 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 4: LT from Minor Street NB SB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 70 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 964 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 1.00 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 1.00 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.99 Movement Capacity: -------------------------------------------------------- (pcph) 953 Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95t Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph)(sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh) -------- ------ ------ ------ ------- ------- ----- --------- 2.7 NB R 15 1337 2.7 0.0 A SB L 61 953 4.0 0.1 A 4.0 Intersection Delay = 2.1 sec/veh PC reCOrO In Warier Fooman City Clerk a- 199 APPENDIX E: Future (2003) Traffic Performance Calculations (Without Project Trips) owl � With '"er Flan Coy Clerk - 499 Miramar Center Phases II and III 2003 NO PROJECT - PM Peak Hour Analysis Existing Signal Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters 1 - Biscayne Blvd @ NE 13th ST 10/23/00 08:08:17 APPLABELS SB WB NB EB GRADES 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 PEDLEVELS 0 0 0 0 PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 20 20 20 20 BUSVOLUMES 18 10 5 5 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 0 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS RT TH LT 0 1135 0 0.0 36.0 0.0 0 3 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.84 0.84 0.84 4 4 3 NO NO YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 5224 0 Phasing Parameters RT TH LT 0 362 364 0.0 24.0 24.0 0 2 2 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.95 0.95 0.95 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3651 3614 SEQUENCES 31 ALL PERMISSIVES YES YES YES OVERLAPS NO NO NO CYCLES 80 150 10 GREENTIMES 8.00 75.00 19.00 YELLOWTIMES 3.00 5.00 5.00 CRITICALS 0 0 0 EXCESS 0 YES NO RT TH LT 0 1975 133 0.0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.97 0.97 0.97 4 4 3 NO NO YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3688 1863 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME RT TH LT 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.90 0.90 0.90 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 0 0 NONE NONE 0.00 1 0.0 0 Sub fteca into tt� cabiic recOrIn into with Walter Foeman ''ty Clerk 01- 199 Miramar Center Phases II and III 10/23/00 2003 NO PROJECT - PM Peak Hour Analysis 08:08:28 Existing Signal Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 1 - Biscayne Blvd @ NE 13th ST Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.60 Vehicle Delay 10.8 Level of Service B+ ------------------------------------- Sq 31 1 Phase 1 I Phase 2 1 Phase 3 1 **/**--------------------------- /I� I I North I i I + I I I I + I I + I <++++1 I I v I ++++I I I AI v I 1 <+ + 1 <+ + I I 1 ++ I ++ i I 1 ++ 1 ++ 1 I ------------------------------------- G/C=0.070 i G/C=0.652 1 G/C=0.165 I G= 8.0" 1 G= 75.0" I G= 19.0" Y+R= 3.0" I Y+R= 5.0" I Y+R= 5.0" I OFF= 0.0% I OFF= 9.6% I OFF=79.1% 1 ------------------------------------- C=115 sec G=102.0 sec = 88.7% Y=13.0 sec = 11.3% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I Lane lWidth/1 g/C I Service Ratel Adj I I HCM I L 190% Maxi I Group I Lanesl Regd Used I @C (vph) @E 1Volumel v/c I Delay I S I Queue I ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SB Approach 4.4 A ---------------------------------------------- 1 TH 1 36/3 10.342 10.652 1 3407 1 3407 1 1351 10.397 1 4.4 1 A 1 253 ft1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NB Approach 2.1 A ---------------------------------------------------- I TH 1 24/2 10.557 10.748 1 2758 1 2758 1 2036 10.738 1 1.9 1 A 1 415 ftl I LT 1 12/1 10.000 10.070 1 341 1 368 1 137 10.372 1 4.3 1 A 1 52 ft1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ WB Approach 47.0 D ------------------------------------------------- I TH 1 24/2 10.264 10.165 1 1 1 593 1 381 10.632 1 46.9 1 D 1 257 ftl I LT 1 24/2 10.265 10.165 1 1 1 587 1 383 10.642 1 47.2 1 D 1 258 ftl ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SJbl*tted into the pa ge n cc4"jMz0n Wafter Fran clerk 199 Miramar Center Phases II and III 2003 NO PROJECT - PM Peak Hour Analysis Existing Signal Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # 2 - Biscayne Blvd @ NE 14th ST METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters 10/23/00 11:32:05 APPLABELS SB WB NB EB GRADES 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 PEDLEVELS 0 0 0 0 PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 20 20 20 20 BUSVOLUMES 18 10 5 5 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 0 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS RT TH LT 45 1173 69 0.0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.93 0.93 0.93 4 4 3 NO NO YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3572 1863 Phasing Parameters RT TH LT 28 19 45 0.0 12.0 12.0 0 1 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.74 0.74 0.74 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 1715 1401 SEQUENCES 41 ALL PERMISSIVES YES YES YES YES OVERLAPS NO NO NO NO CYCLES 80 150 10 GREENTIMES 7.00 76.00 20.00 38.00 YELLOWTIMES 3.00 5.00 4.00 0.00 CRITICALS 0 0 0 0 EXCESS 0 RT TH LT 72 2401 57 0.0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.97 0.97 0.97 4 4 3 NO NO YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3672 1863 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME RT TH LT 42 51 31 12.0 12.0 12.0 1 1 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.78 0.78 0.78 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 1552 1961 1403 NONE NONE 0.00 1 0.0 0 3ub#Mtt d into the public re in c®nneetion with Wafter i=ceman City Clerk 01- 199 Miramar Center Phases II and III 10/23/00 2003 NO PROJECT- PM Peak Hour Analysis 11:31:31 Existing Signal Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.001 - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 2 - Biscayne Blvd @ NE 14th ST Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.82 Vehicle Delay 29.4 Level of Service C ------------------------------------- Sq 41 1 Phase 1 1 Phase 2 1 Phase 3 1 **/** ------------------------- + + + + ( ^ .1 +> j<+ + +> <++++� V ^ ^++++ v North <+ <+ + +>I++++> + + + +I ++++ + +++I v ------------------------------------- G/C=0.061 G/C=0.661 G/C=0.174 G= 7.0" G= 76.0" G= 20.0" Y+R= 3.0" Y+R= 5.0" ( Y+R= 4.0" OFF= 0.0% ------------------------------------- OFF= 8.7% OFF=79.1 % C=115 sec G=103.0 sec = 89.6% Y=12.0 sec = 10.4% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Lane Width/I . g/C I Service Rate Adj I I HCM I L 190% Maxi Group I Lanese ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Reqd Used I @C (vph) @E jVolumej v/c I Delay I S I Queue SB Approach 6.6 A TH+RTI 24/2 10.416 10.661 1 2360 1 2360 1 1309 10.555 1 5.2 1 A 1 359 ftl LT 1 12/1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10.037 10.061 1 101 1 163 1 74 10.409 1 31.6 1 C 1 80 ftp NB Approach 40.2 D+ I TH+RTI 24/2 10.671 10.661 1 2427 1 2427 1 2549 11.050 1 41.0 1 D+1 699 ftp LT 1 12/1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10.000 10.061 1 337 1 365 1 59 10.162 1 4.1 1 A 1 25 ftj WB Approach 41.3 D+ TH+RTI 12/1 10.236 -------------------------------------------------------- 10.174 1 1 ( 276 1 64 10.215 1 41.1 1 D+1 85 ftj LT 1 12/1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10.240 10.174 ( 1 1 221 1 61 10.250 1 41.6 1 D+1 81 ftp EB Approach 40.9 D+ I RT 1 12/1 ---------------------------------------------------------- 10.236 10.174 1 1 1 248 1 54 10.200 1 41.0 1 D+1 72 ftj I TH 1 12/1 10.234 10.174 1 1 1 320 1 65 10.191 1 40.9 1 D+1 87 ftj LT 1 12/1 10.233 10.174 1 1 1 221 1 40 10.164 1 40.7 1 D+1 53 ftj ----------------------------------------------- - -------------------- ` �C it fA the pubioc record in Conne^ticn a �pth ` Wa tar FOO+°han GUY Clerk Miramar Center Phases II and III 2003 NO PROJECT - PM Peak Hour Analysis Existing Signal Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # 3 - Biscayne Blvd @o NE 15th ST METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters 10/23/00 14:18:16 APPLABELS SB WB NB EB GRADES 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 PEDLEVELS 0 0 0 0 PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 20 20 20 20 BUSVOLUMES 18 10 5 5 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 0 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS RT TH LT 3 1240 85 0.0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.92 0.92 0.92 4 4 3 NO NO YES 5.0 5.0 3.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3590 1863 Phasing Parameters RT TH LT 50 276 85 0.0 12.0 12.0 0 1 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.91 0.91 0.91 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 1839 954 SEQUENCES 21 ALL PERMISSIVES YES YES YES YES OVERLAPS NO NO NO NO CYCLES 115 115 10 GREENTIMES 5.25 73.11 24.64 YELLOWTIMES 3.00 5.00 4.00 CRITICALS 3 8 5 EXCESS 0 RT TH LT 132 2204 14 0.0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.93 0.93 0.93 4 4 3 NO NO YES 5.0 5.0 3.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3657 395 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME RT TH LT 1 134 19 0.0 12.0 0.0 0 1 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.89 0.89 0.89 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 993 0 SUbOlItted into the public record in core erton with 1`18M PZ -2 On X.,LZIal. Ci±y Clerk NONE NONE 0.00 1 0.0 0 oi- 199 Miramar Center Phases II and III 10/23/00 2003 NO PROJECT - PM Peak Hour Analysis 14:17:27 Existing Signal Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 3 - Biscayne Blvd @ NE 15th ST Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.87 Vehicle Delay 40.0 Level of Service D+ ------------------------------------- Sq 21 1 Phase 1 1 Phase 2 1 Phase 3 1 **/** ------------------------ + + * + + + ^ /1\<+ + *><+ + +> v v ^ ++++ ^++++ v North <+ * *>I++++> + * I ++++ +**I v ----------- ------------------------ G/C=0.046 G/C=0.636 ( G/C=0.214 G= 5.3" G= 73.1" G= 24.6" Y+R= 3.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 4.0" OFF= 0.0% OFF= 7.2% ------------------------------------- OFF=75.1% C=115 sec G=103.0 sec = 89.6% Y=12.0 sec = 10.4% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Lane Width/1 . g/C I Service Rate Adj I I HCM I L 190% Maxj Group I Lanese Reqd Used ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I @C (vph) @E [Volumed v/c I Delay I S I Queue SB Approach 4.7 A I TH+RTI 24/2 10.423 10.708 --------------------------------------------- 1 2540 1 2540 1 1351 10.532 1 2.6 1 A ( 319 ftp LT 1 12/1 10.048 10.046 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 89 1 137 1 92 10.601 1 36.1*D+l 96 ftp NB Approach 54.4 D ------------------------------------------=----------- I TH+RTS 24/2 10.665 10.636 1 2325 1 2325 1 2512 11.080 1 54.7 *D 1 740 ftj LT 1 12/1 10.243 10.636 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 206 1 251 ( 15 10.060 1 8.0 1 A 1 25 ftp WB Approach 62.8 E+ ----------------------------------------------------- TH+RTI 12/1 10.319 10.214 1 1 1 379 1 358 10.909 1 68.5 *E 1 455 ftj LT 1 12/1 10.268 10.214 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 1 1 183 1 93 10.456 1 41.0 1 D+1 118 ftp EB Approach 63.7 E+ ------------------- ALT+TH+RTI 12/1 10.314 10.214 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 1 1 192 1 ------------____--------_____ 173 10.812 1 63.7 1 E+) 220 ftp sub""911 i"10 the Public le in conne" -on with t 2� on,:2 E I�Er I M's -iter Fran 01— 199 City Clerk Miramar Center Phases II and III 2003 NO PROJECT - PM Peak Hour Analysis Existing Signal Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # 4 - Biscayne Blvd @ NE 17th ST METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters 10/23/00 08:14:33 APPLABELS SB WB NB EB GRADES 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 PEDLEVELS 0 0 0 0 PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 20 20 20 20 BUSVOLUMES 18 10 5 5 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 0 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS RT TH LT 42 1426 0 0.0 24.0 0.0 0 2 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.92 0.92 0.92 4 4 3 NO NO YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3576 0 Phasing Parameters RT TH LT 2 1 1 12.0 12.0 12.0 1 1 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.50 0.50 0.50 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM DOPT NORM 1520 1961 1863 SEQUENCES 17 ALL PERMISSIVES YES YES YES OVERLAPS NO NO NO CYCLES 80 150 10 GREENTIMES 68.00 16.00 17.00 YELLOWTIMES 5.00 4.00 5.00 CRITICALS 0 0 0 EXCESS 0 YES NO RT TH LT 0 1864 42 0.0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.86 0.86 0.86 4 4 3 NO NO YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3688 223 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME RT TH LT 29 1 24 0.0 12.0 0.0 0 1 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.72 0.72 0.72 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM DOPT NORM 0 1554 0 NONE NONE 0.00 1 0.0 0 ` ubo"ttIld 1/3#0 thenxq �ZJ- O - Ort � Wetter F60man City Clerk 01- 199 Miramar Center Phases II and III 10/23/00 2003 NO PROJECT - PM Peak Hour Analysis 08:14:42 Existing Signal Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 4 - Biscayne Blvd @ NE 17th ST Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.87 Vehicle Delay 24.0 Level of Service C+ ------------------------------------- Sq 17 1 Phase 1 1 Phase 2 1 Phase 3 1 **/**------------------------------------- + + ------------------------- ++ I I I I + + 1 ++++I I /1\ 1<+ + I <++++I I I v I ++++I I I v I++++ 1 North 1 <+ + I I++++> 1 I I ++ I I++++ I I ++ I I v I ------------------------------------ G/C=0.591 1 G/C=0.139 I G/C=0.148 1 G= 68.0" I G= 16.0" 1 G= 17.0" 1 l Y+R= 5.0" l Y+R= 4.0" l Y+R= 5.0" I I OFF= 0.0% I OFF=63.50 I OFF=80.9% ------------------------------------- C=115 sec G=101.0 sec = 87.8% Y=14.0 sec = 12.2% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I Lane (Width/I g/C I Service Ratel Adj I I HCM I L 190% Maxi I Group I Lanesl Reqd Used I @C (vph) @E IVolumel v/c I Delay I S I Queue I ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SB Approach 12.9 B+ ---------------------------------------------- I TH+RTI 24/2 10.474 10.591 1 2114 1 2114 1 1596 10.755 1 12.9 1 B+1 527 ftl ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NB Approach 31.3 C ------------------------------------------------------- I TH 1 24/2 10.585 10.591 1 2181 1 2181 1 2167 10.994 1 31.7 1 C 1 716 ftl I LT 1 12/1 10.429 10.591 1 82 1 106 1 , 49 10.426 1 15.4 1 B 1 32 ftl ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WB Approach 42.7 D+ ---------------------------------------------------- 1 RT 1 12/1 10.221 10.139 1 1 I 186 1 4 10.019 1 42.8 1-D+1--25 ftI 1 TH 1 12/1 10.220 10.139 1 1 1 248 I 2 10.007 1 42.7 1 D+1 25 fti 1 LT 1 12/1 10.220 10.139 1 1 1 234 1 2 10.008 1 42.7 1 D+1 25 ftl ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- EB Approach 44.7 D+ ------------------------------------------------------------ ILT+TH+RTI 12/1 10.241 10.148 1 1 1 205 1 74 10.322 1 44.7 1 D+1 102 ftl ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ti3c 0 in cc6`3nncji with ltm" ta"-� oli 01— 199 WMr poen CitY Clerk Miramar Center Phases II and III 10/23/00 2003 NO PROJECT - PM Peak Hour Analysis 08:02:14 Existing Signal Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # 5 - Biscayne Blvd @ NE 17th Terrac METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS SB WB NB EB GRADES 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 PEDLEVELS 0 0 0 0 PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 20 20 20 20 BUSVOLUMES 18 10 5 5 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 0 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS RT TH IT 10 1392 282 0.0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.6 2.0 2.0 0.91 0.91 0.91 4 4 3 NO NO YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3588 1863 Phasing Parameters RT TH LT 141 21 72 0.0 12.0 12.0 0 1 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.94 0.94 0.94 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 1634 1440 SEQUENCES 21 ALL PERMISSIVES YES YES YES OVERLAPS NO NO NO CYCLES 80 150 10 GREENTIMES 18.00 65.00 18.00 YELLOWTIMES 5.00 4.00 5.00 CRITICALS 0 0 0 EXCESS 0 YES NO RT TH LT 126 1794 11 0.0 24.0 12.0 0 1 2 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.87 0.87 0.87 4 4 3 NO NO YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3652 347 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME RT TH LT 5 17 6 0.0 12.0 0.0 0 1 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.63 0.63 0.63 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 1513 0 Subotted k1to i"ie public record Jn c€rnnWion vvith 2 on I Water Foeman City Clerk NONE NONE 0.00 1 0.0 0 01- 199 Miramar Center Phases II and III 10/23/00 2003 NO PROJECT - PM Peak Hour Analysis 08:02:31 Existing Signal Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.001 - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 5 - Biscayne Blvd @ NE 17th Terrac Degree of Saturation (V/c) 0.83 Vehicle Delay 36.8 Level of Service D+ ------------------------------------- Sq 21 ( Phase 1 ( Phase 2 ( Phase 3 **/** ------------------------------------- /(\ (<+ + +> (<+ + +> <++++( ( ( v ( v ( ++++I North <+ + +>1++++> ( + + + ( v ------------------------------------- ( G/C=0.157 ( G/C=0.565 ( G/C=0.157 ( G= 18.0" ( G= 65.0" ( G= 18.0" Y+R= 5.0" ( Y+R= 4.0" ( Y+R= 5.0" ( OFF= 0.0% OFF=20.00-. OFF=80.0% ------------------------------------- C=115 sec G=101.0 sec = 87.8`-s Y=14.0 sec = 12.2% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ( Lane 1Width/1 g/C I Service Rate Adj ( I HCM I L 190% Max( I Group ( Lanes( Regd Used ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ( @C (vph) @E (Volumed v/c I Delay I S ( Queue SB Approach 10.3 B+ ( TH+RTI 24/2 10.461 10.765 1 2745 ( 2745 1 1541 10.561 1 0.8 1 A 1 292 ftp ( IT ( 12/1 10.232 10.157 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ( 206 ( 350 1 310 10.861 ( 57.5 1 E+1 312 ftp NB Approach 57.4 E+ ( TH+RT( 24/2 10.598 10.565 ( 2055 1 2064 ( 2207 11.069 ( 57.6 ( E+( 776 ftp LT ( 12/1 10.246 10.565 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ( 139 ( 178 ( 13 10.071 ( 11.5 ( B+( 25 ftj WB Approach 49.9 D ( TH+RTI 12/1 10.268 10.157 ( 1 ( 232 ( 172 10.672 ( 52.4 1 D 1 235 ft) LT ( 12/1 10.244 10.157 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 1 ( 201 ( 77 10.342 1 44.1 ( D+( 105 ft( EB Approach 42.5 D+ (LT+TH+RT( 12/1 10.233 10.157 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ( 1 1 219 1 45 10.185 1 42.5 ( D+1 61 ftl Submtftec reVV In (`iama'.*thin with bw on .241a I � 91— 199 Walter l=oornan City Clerk Miramar Center Phases II and III 2003 NO PROJECT - PM Peak Hour Analysis Existing Signal Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # 6 - Biscayne Blvd @ NE 19th ST METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters 10/23/00 08:16:09 APPLABELS SB WB NB EB GRADES 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 PEDLEVELS 0 0 0 0 PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 20 20 20 20 BUSVOLUMES 18 10 5 5 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 0 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS RT TH LT 1 1612 15 0.0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.90 0.90 0.90 4 4 3 NO NO YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3591 111 Phasing Parameters SEQUENCES 11 ALL PERMISSIVES YES YES OVERLAPS NO NO CYCLES 80 150 GREENTIMES 80.00 25.00 YELLOWTIMES 5.00 5.00 CRITICALS 0 0 EXCESS 0 RT TH LT 80 89 42 12.0 12.0 0.0 1 1 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.92 0.92 0.92 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 1520 1654 0 YES YES NO NO 10 RT TH LT 4 1943 13 0.0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.87 0.87 0.87 4 4 3 NO NO YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3687 244 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME RT TH LT 24 81 32 0.0 12.0 0.0 0 1 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.91 0.91 0.91 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 1518 0 NONE NONE 0.00 1 0.0 0 SubrNffed jr" reC � +G`Public Q3S°dl _ Z 2 CC1 O`109� With rQt., C3erk o i - 199 Miramar Center Phases II and III 10/23/00 2003 NO PROJECT - PM Peak Hour Analysis 08:16:18 Existing Signal Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 6 - Biscayne Blvd @ NE 19th ST Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.76 Vehicle Delay 9.4 Level of Service A ------------------------- Sq 11 1 Phase 1 I Phase 2 1 **/** ------------------------- 1+++ I I /1\ I<+ + +> 1 <++++I I I v I ++++ 1 I I 1++++ v 1 North I <+ + +>1++++> I I I + + + I++++ I 1 + + + 1 v I ------------------------ G/C=0.696 I G/C=0.217 1 I G= 80.0" 1 G= 25.0" 1 I Y+R= 5.0" l Y+R= 5.0" 1 OFF= 0.0% 1 OFF=73.9 % 1 ------------------------- C=115 sec G=105.0 sec = 91.3% Y=10.0 sec = 8.7% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I Lane (Width/1 g/C I Service Ratel Adj I I HCM I L 190% Maxl I Group I Lanesl Regd ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Used I @C (vph) @E IVolumel v/c I Delay I S I Queue I SB Approach 4.7 A I TH+RTI 24/2 10.515 --------------------------------------------------- 10.696 1 2498 1 2498 1 1792 10.717 1 4.7 1 A 1 441 ftl I LT 1 12/1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10.274 10.696 1 47 1 60 1 17 10.250 1 8.4 1 A 1 25 ftl NB Approach 8.2 A I TH+RTI 24/2 10.601 ------------------------------------------____________ 10.696 1 2565 1 2565 1 2238 10.873 1 8.2 1 A 1 550 ft) I IT 1 12/1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10.266 10.696 1 123 1 151 1 15 10.097 1 6.0 1 A 1 25 ftl WB Approach 38.7 D+ 1 RT 1 12/1 10.246 ------------------------------------------------------ 10.217 1 1 1 313 1 87 10.264 1 37.8 1 D+1 110 ftl ILT+TH 1 12/1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10.259 10.217 1 1 1 342 1 143 10.399 1 39.3 1 D+1 181 ftI EB Approach 40.1 D+ ILT+TH+RTI 12/1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------- 10.266 10.217 1 1 1 313 1 150 10.455 1 40.1 1 D+1 190 ftI Subm#40d ince public r0000 in � cOnrzocrp��n on Wai'lear 199 art City Clerk Miramar Center Phases II and III 2003 NO PROJECT - PM Peak Hour Analysis Existing Signal Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # 7 - Bayshore @ NE 13th ST METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters 10/23/00 08:28:48 APPLABELS SB WB NB EB GRADES 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 PEDLEVELS 0 0 0 0 PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 20 20 20 20 BUSVOLUMES 18 10 5 5 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 0 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS RT TH LT 295 267 0 12.0 12.0 0.0 1 1 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.87 0.87 0.87 4 4 3 NO NO YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM DOPT NORM 1469 1961 0 Phasing Parameters SEQUENCES 11 ALL PERMISSIVES YES YES OVERLAPS NO NO CYCLES 80 150 GREENTIMES 30.00 42.00 YELLOWTIMES 4.00 4.00 CRITICALS 0 0 EXCESS 0 RT TH LT 150 595 9 0.0 48.0 0.0 0 4 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.82 0.82 0.82 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 6851 0 YES YES NO NO 10 RT TH LT 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.96 0.96 0.96 4 4 3 NO NO YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 0 0 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME RT TH LT 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.90 0.90 0.90 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM .0 0 0 NONE NONE 0.00 1 0.0 0 Subfttted into the public retia in connection with tte n On 2 & t Wafter Foeman City Clerk 91- 199 Miramar Center Phases II and III 10/23/00 2003 NO PROJECT - PM Peak Hour Analysis 08:28:57 Existing Signal Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 7 - Bayshore @ NE 13th ST Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.37 Vehicle Delay 15.0 Level of Service B+ ------------------------- Sq 11 1 Phase 1 1 Phase 2 1 **/**------------------------- + + I I 1 + + 1 ++++I /1\ 1<+ + I <++++1 I I v 1 ++++I I I I v I North l I I I I I I I I ------------------------- G/C=0.375 I G/C=0.525 1 I G= 30.0" I G= 42.0" I Y+R= 4.0" I Y+R= 4.0" 1 1 OFF= 0.0% ( OFF=42.5 % I ------------------------- C= 80 sec G= 72.0 sec = 90.0% Y= 8.0 sec = 10.0% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I Lane lWidth/I g/C I Service Ratel Adj I I HCM I L 190% Maxl I Group I Lanesl Regd ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Used I @C (vph) @E 1Volumel v/c I Delay I S I Queue I SB Approach 21.4 C+ I RT 1 12/1 10.309 10.375 --------------------------------------------- 1 462 1 551 1 339 10.615 1 23.8 1 C+1 238 ftI I TH 1 12/1 10.236 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10.375 1 642 1 735 1 307 10.418 1 18.8 1 B 1 216 ftl WB Approach 10.5 B+ ILT+TH+RTI 48/4 10.173 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10.525 1 ----------------------------------------------- 3597 1 3597 1 .920 10.256 1 10.5 1 B+1 123 ftl Subl,"tttod Into, the public 'COIre connP-Mon with lt� %t--. _ a, Fooman libClerk I- 9 Miramar Center Phases II and III 2003 NO PROJECT - PM Peak Hour Analysis Existing Signal Phasing 10/23/00 07:52:49 SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.001 - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS GRADES PEDLEVELS PARKINGSIDES PARKVOLUMES BUSVOLUMES RIGHTTURNONREDS Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS 8 - Bayshore @ NE 14th ST SB WB NB EB 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 NONE NONE NONE NONE 20 20 20 20 18 10 5 5 0 0 0 0 RT TH LT 41 470 3 0.0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.97 0.97 0.97 4 4 3 NO NO YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3548 1863 Phasing Parameters RT TH LT 9 23 48 0.0 24.0 0.0 0 2 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.79 0.79 0.79 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 2771 0 SEQUENCES 41 ALL PERMISSIVES YES YES YES OVERLAPS NO NO NO CYCLES 80 150 10 GREENTIMES 10.00 38.00 19.00 YELLOWTIMES 3.00 5.00 5.00 CRITICALS 0 0 0 EXCESS 0 YES NO RT TH LT 3 120 12 0.0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.92 0.92 0.92 4 4 3 NO NO YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3675 1863 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME RT TH LT 52 21 89 0.0 24.0 0.0 0 2 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.89 0.89 0.89 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 2744 0 Subr-N ted into the public rO(*q in connecgon with hem r -Z-2-- onc� Walter FOerraan City Clerk NONE NONE 0.00 1 0.0 0 01- 199 Miramar Center Phases II and III 10/23/00 2003 NO PROJECT - PM Peak Hour Analysis 07:53:03 Existing Signal Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.001 - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 8 - Bayshore @ NE 14th ST Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.25 Vehicle Delay 14.7 Level of Service B+ ------------------------------------- Sq 41 1 Phase 1 I Phase 2 1 Phase 3 1 **/** ------------------------------------- + + + + ^ +><+ + +> ( <++++� V ^ ++++) ^++++ v North <+ ( <+ + +>1++++> I + + + + I++++ I + +++I v ------------------------------------- G/C=0.125 G/C=0.475 G/C=0.237 j G= 10.0" 4 G= 38.0" G= 19.0" Y+R= 3.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" OFF= 0.0% OFF=16.3% OFF=70.0% ------------------------------------- C= 80 sec G= 67.0 sec = 83.8% Y=13.0 sec = 16.3% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Lane Width/1 , g/C I Service Rate Adj I I RCM I L 190% Maxi Group I Lanese Reqd Used ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I @C (vph) @E (Volumed v/c I Delay ( S I Queue SB Approach 10.8 B+ TH+RTI 24/2 10.210 10.475 1 1659 1 1686 1 527 10.313 1 10.9 1 B+1 156 ftp LT 1 12/1 10.000 10.125 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 894 1 917 1 3 10.003 1 4.6 ( A 1 25 ftj NB Approach 8.9 A TH+RTI 24/2 10.110 10.475 1 1721 1 1746 1 -133 10.076 ( 9.3 1 A 1 39 ft' IT 1 12/1 10.000 10.125 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 623 1 650 1 13 10.020 1 4.8 1 A 1 25 ftj WB Approach 24.3 C+ ALT+TH+RTI 24/2-X0.095 10.237 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 516 1 654 1 101 10.154 1 24.3 1 C+1 43 ftj EB Approach 25.1 C+ ----------------------------------------------------- (LT+TH+RTI 24/2 10.121 10.237 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 512 1 650 ( 182 - 10.280 1 25.1 1 C+1 78 ftp Sub""'We" (-ntO the public record in On 91— 199 Ife. r F,�iOman Miramar Center Phases II and III 2003 NO PROJECT - PM Peak Hour Analysis Existing Signal Phasing 10/23/00 07:56:59 SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS GRADES PEDLEVELS PARKINGSIDES PARKVOLUMES BUSVOLUMES RIGHTTURNONREDS Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS 9 - Bayshore @ NE 15th ST SB WB NB EB 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 NONE NONE NONE NONE 20 20 20 20 18 10 5 5 0 0 0 0 RT TH LT 44 454 21 0.0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.96 0.96 0.96 4 4 3 NO NO YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3544 1863 Phasing Parameters RT TH LT 37 313 2 12.0 12.0 12.0 1 1 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.90 0.90 0.90 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 1520 1961 1863 SEQUENCES 44 ALL PERMISSIVES YES YES YES OVERLAPS NO NO NO CYCLES 80 150 10 GREENTIMES 9.00 23.00 6.00 YELLOWTIMES 3.00 5.00 3.00 CRITICALS 0 0 0 EXCESS 0 YES NO RT TH LT 38 126 8 0.0 24.0 0.0 0 2 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.83 0.83 0.83 4 4 3 NO NO YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3478 0 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME 25.00 6.00 0 Subffiitk u m1c) (Fre p ub is recce In ccnnecdcon with t Z-- 2 / z L Walter FO&nan City Clerk RT TH LT 27 267 65 0.0 12.0 12.0 0 1 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.88 0.88 0.88 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 1895 1863 NONE NONE 0.00 1 0.0 0 1- 199 Miramar Center Phases II and III 10/23/00 2003 NO PROJECT - PM Peak Hour Analysis 07:57:08 Existing Signal Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.001 - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 9 - Bayshore @ NE 15th ST Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.46 Vehicle Delay 23.5 Level of Service C+ ---------------7--------------------------------- Sq 44 1 Phase 1 I Phase'2 ( Phase 3 1 Phase 4 1 **/** ------------------------------------------------- + . i + i+++ i + + + ++++ I I +> j<+ + +> <++++� v I A ++++I A++++j I++++ v++++ v North <+ <+ + +>I++++> + + + +++++ + j + + + I v ------------------------------------------------- G/C=0.112 G/C=0.287 G/C=0.075 ` G/C=0.313 G= 9.0" G= 23.0" G= 6.0" ( G= 25.0" Y+R= 3.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 3.0" ( Y+R= 6.0" OFF= 0.0% OFF=15.0% OFF=50.0% OFF=61.3% ------------------------------------------------- C= 80 sec G= 63.0 sec = 78.8% Y=17.0 sec = 21.3% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Lane lWidth/I _ g/C I Service Rate Adj I ( HCM I L 190% Maxi I Group j Lanese ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Reqd Used I @C (vph) @E jVolumej v/c I Delay I S I Queue SB Approach 24.9 C+ ------------------------------------------- TH+RTI 24/2 10.208 10.287 1 857 1 1019 1 519 10.509 1 25.5 1 C+1 208 ft( I LT 1 12/1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10.000 10.112 1 527 1 587 j 22 10.037 1 11.8 1 B+1 25 ftp NB Approach 22.0 C+ ----------------------------------------- ILT+TH+RTI 24/2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10.134 10.287 1 - 839 1 1000 1 -208 10.208 1 22.0 1 C+1 83 ftp WB Approach 23.7 C+ ------------------------------------- RT 1 12/1 10.093 10.313 1 - - 383 1 475 1 41 10.086 1 19.5 ( B 1 32 ftj TH j 12/1 10.237 10.313 1 510 1 613 1 348 10.568 1 24.2 1 C+1 269 ftj LT 1 12/1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10.000 10.075 1 333 1 393 j 2 10.005 ) 12.6 1 B+1 25 ftp EB Approach 22.3 C+ ----------------------------------------- TH+RTI 12/1 10.237 10.313 1 490 1 592 1 334 10.564 1 24.2 1 C+) 258 ft) LT 1 12/1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10.000 10.075 1 322 1 381 1 74 10.194 1 13.5 1 B+) 45 ftp SubfMtted into thO Public ir`19CO� inces' .h o1-- 199 w1fL.r F' aman Citi Clerk HCS: Unsignalize,_ Intersections Release 2.1g BS-17TFN.HCO Page 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 Streets: (N -S) N.BAYSHORE DR. (E -W) NE 17TH TERR. Major Street Direction.... EW Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) Analyst. • TI Date of Analysis......... 10/23/0 Other Information ......... 2003 NO PROJECT -PM PEAK Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection Eastbound' Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes Stop/Yield Volumes PHF Grade MCIs (o) SU/RV's CV,s (g) PCE I s ------------ 0 1 < 1 N 4 453 .84 .84 0 --------------- 0 > 1 0 NI 3 130 .73 .73 0- I 1.10 ---------------- 1 0 1 354 48 .85 .85 0 11.10 1.10 ---------------- Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) ------------------------------------------------------------------ Left Turn Major Road 5.00 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.00 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 6.50 3.40 Subr"J"ed into the public with W"R kr Foe man City Clerk 01- 199 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1g BS-17TFN.HC0 Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection -------------------------------------------------------- Step 1: RT from Minor Street NB SB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 5 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1377 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1377 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.95 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 2: LT from Major Street WB EB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 544 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 944 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 944 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 1.00 TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) ------- 4.0 B Major LT Shared Lane Prob. of Queue -Free State: 1.00 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 4: LT from Minor Street NB SB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 186 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 826 Major LT, Minor TH WB L 4 Impedance Factor: 1.00 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 1.00 Capacity Adjustment Factor Intersection Delay = due to Impeding Movements 1.00 Movement Capacity: (pcph) -------------------------------------------------------- 822 Intersection Performance Summary Subf", )t' d into th, ptlbgc record in C0nna(�[,A iWm _. o,�� n 'ar Fcatl CP+,r Clerk 01— 199 Avg. 955 Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph)(sec/veh) (veh) ----- (sec/veh) --------- -------- ------ NB L 458 ------ 822 ------------- 9.9 ------- 4.0 B 9.0 NB R 62 1377 2.7 0.0 A WB L 4 944 3.8 0.0 A 0.1 Intersection Delay = 3.7 sec/veh Subf", )t' d into th, ptlbgc record in C0nna(�[,A iWm _. o,�� n 'ar Fcatl CP+,r Clerk 01— 199 HCS: Unsignalize, Intersections Release 2.1g 4-17FN.HCO Page 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392 -0378 ------------ ---------- Streets: (N -S) NE 4TH AVE (E -W) NE 17TH TERR. Major Street Direction.... EW Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) Analyst ................... TI Date of Analysis.......... 10/23/0 Other Information ......... 2003 NO PROJECT -PM PEAK Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes Stop/Yield Volumes PHF Grade MCI s (s) SU/RV's CV' s ( 6 ) PCE' s ------------ 1 1 0 N 1 426 .93 .93 0 1.10 --------------- 0 1 0 N 208 .95 0 ---------------- Adjustment Factors 0 > 1 < 0 1 0 9 .56 .56 .56 0 1.10 1.10 1.10 --------------- Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver ------------------------------------------------------------------ Gap (tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road 5.00 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.00 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 6.50 3.40 Submitted ince the ,,.iblic recons _in cenne�;I �)s� �i, ?Z W'afor Foeman City Clerk 01- 199 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1g 4-17FN.HCO Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection -------------------------------------------------------- Step 1: RT from Minor Street -------------------------------------------------------- NB SB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 219 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1072 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1072 Prob. of Queue -Free State: -------------------------------------------------------- 0.98 Step 2: LT from Major Street WB EB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 219 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1348 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1348 Prob. of Queue -Free State: -------------------------------------------------------- 1.00 Step 3: TH from Minor Street -------------------------------------------------------- NB SB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 678 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 481 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 1.00 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 481 Prob. of Queue -Free State: -------------------------------------------------------- 1.00 Step 4: LT from Minor Street --------------=----------------------------------------- NB SB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 678 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 429 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 1.00 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 1.00 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 1.00 Movement Capacity: (pcph) -------------------------------------------------------- 429 Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95%- 5gFlow FlowMove Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph)(sec/veh) -------- ------ ------ -----= (veh) (sec/veh) SB L 2 429 > -------------- ----- --------- SB T 0 481 > 932 3.9 0.0 A 3.9 SB R 18 1072 > EB L 1 1348 2.7 0.0 A 0.0 Intersection Delay = 0.1 sec/veh Submitted 'n,o the Public recOrd��0 cc��y s1(^fi�c��� �rrrh _�_ On 01-- 199 ftfkr Finan City ClPrr, HCS: Unsignalize, Intersections Release 2.1g 4W-18EN.HCO Page 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 -- ------- -------- Streets: (N -S) NE 4TH AVE(WESTSIDE) (E -W) NE 18TH ST. Major Street Direction.... NS Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) Analyst................... TI Date of Analysis.......... 10/23/0 Other Information ......... 2003 NO PROJECT -PM PEAK Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound L T R L T R L T R L T R __J No. Lanes Stop/Yield Volumes PHF Grade MC' s ('s) SU/RV's CV's (%) PCE' s ------------ 0 > 1 < 0 N 49 95 2 .5 .5 .5 0 1.10 --------------- 0 > 1 0 N 2 13 .77 .77 0 1.10 ---------------- 0 1 1 21 21 .64 .64 0 1.10 1.10 ---------------- Adjustment Factors 0 > 2 0 2 20 .66 .66 0 1.10 1.10 --------------- Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver ------------------------------------------------------------------ Gap (tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road 5.00 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.00 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 6.50 3.40 SubWthmd Into th f. 1r➢ Itm on .9,,1? 6,i Walter Finan City Clerk 01- 199 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1g 4W-18EN.HCO Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection -------------------------------------------------------- Step 1: RT from Minor Street WB EB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 17 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1357 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1357 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.97 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 2: LT from Major Street SB NB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 194 17 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1386 1683 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1386 1683 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 1.00 0.94 TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 1700 RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 Major LT Shared Lane Prob. of Queue -Free State: 1.00 0.93 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 3: TH from Minor Street WB EB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 310 312 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 750 748 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.93 0.93 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 694 692 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.95 0.95 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 4: LT from Minor Street WB EB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 343 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 670 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0.88 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.91 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.88 Movement Capacity: (pcph) -------------------------------------------------------- 591 Sub atteo into the ► R�II r record in connecticcin on Walter Foemar, City Clerk 91- 199 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1g 4W-18EN.HCO Page 3 Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement -------- (pcph) ------ (pcph) (pcph)(sec/veh) ------ ------ (veh) (sec/veh) EB T 36 692 -------------- 5.5 0.0 ----- B --------- 4.1 EB R 36 1357 2.7 0.0 A WB L 3 591 > 684 5.6 0.0 B WB T 33 694 > 5.6 NB L 108 1683 2.3 0.1 A 0.8 SB L 3 1386 2.6 0.0 A 0.3 Intersection Delay = 1.8 sec/veh S��ted antO lh� � r�t// on, 44Z A Walter Fp�a COY Clel fly.- 199 HCS: Unsignalize... Intersections Release 2.1g 4E-18FN.HCO Page 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 --------------------------------------------- Streets: (N -S) NE 4TH AVE(EASTSIDE) (E -W) NE 18TH ST Major Street Direction.... EW Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) Analyst................... TI Date of Analysis.......... 10/23/0 Other Information ......... 2003 NO PROJECT -PM PEAK Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection ------------------------------------ EastboundWestbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes Stop/Yield Volumes PHF Grade MCIs (o) SU/RV's CV's (o) PCE Is ------------ 0 1 0 N 19 .64 0 0 1 0 N 23 .66 0 ---------------- Adjustment Factors 1 0 0 43 .77 0 1.10 --------------- Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver ------------------------------------------------------------------ Gap (tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road 5.00 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.00 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 6.50 3.40 8'ubAWtted into the public re in ita"m r2 = on L2 Clerk r 199 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1g 4E-18FN.HCO Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection -------------------------------------------------------- Step 1: RT from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 30 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1337 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1337 Prob. of Queue -Free State: ----------------------------7--------------------------- 0.99 Step 4: LT from Minor Street NB SB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 73 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 961 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 1.00 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 1.00 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.99 Movement Capacity: (pcph) -------------------------------------------------------- 948 Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95%_ Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph)(sec/veh) -------- ------ ------ -----= (veh) -------------- ----- (sec/veh) --------- 2.7 NB R 18 1337 2.7 0.0 A SB L 62 948 4.1 0.1 A 4.1 Intersection Delay = 2.1 sec/veh S�rta��t�d i,,e 'he pabt€ onKea 1 ter reeman CFiy Cleric Q' ►- 199 APPENDIX F.0 Future (2003) Traffic Performance Calculations (With Project Trips) ttPd o € ublic On "�h k°r�)c3ri City Clerk 0t — 10C9 Miramar Center Phases II and III 2003 W/ PROJECT - PM Peak Hour Analysis Existing Signal Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters 1 - Biscayne Blvd @ NE 13th ST 10/23/00 09:54:23 APPLABELS SB WB NB EB GRADES 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 PEDLEVELS 0 0 0 0 PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 20 20 20 20 BUSVOLUMES 18 10 5 5 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 0 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS RT TH LT 0 1220 0 0.0 36.0 0.0 0 3 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.84 0.84 0.84 4 4 3 NO NO YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 5224 0 Phasing Parameters RT TH LT 0 362 364 0.0 24.0 24.0 0 2 2 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.95 0.95 0.95 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3651 3614 SEQUENCES 31 ALL PERMISSIVES YES YES YES OVERLAPS NO NO NO CYCLES 80 150 10 GREENTIMES 8.00 75.00 19.00 YELLOWTIMES 3.00 5.00 5.00 CRITICALS 0 0 0 EXCESS 0 YES NO RT TH LT 0 2025 133 0.0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.97 0.97 0.97 4 4 3 NO NO YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3688 1863 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME RT TH LT 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.90 0.90 0.90 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 0 0 NONE NONE 0.00 1 0.0 0 'lipsp'oft In2Zj' on With Orla��� fefter Flan City Cie* 01- 199 Miramar Center Phases II and III 10/23/00 2003 W/ PROJECT - PM Peak Hour Analysis 09:54:32 Existing Signal Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 1 - Biscayne Blvd @ NE 13th ST Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.62 Vehicle Delay 10.7 Level of Service B+ ------------------------------------- Sq 31 ( Phase 1 I Phase 2 1 Phase 3 1 **/** ------------------------------------- + • + + <++++� I v I ++++I I I ^ I ^ I v North <+ + <+ + + + + + + + + + ------------------------------------- G/C=0.070 G/C=0.652 G/C=0.165 G= 8.0" G= 75.0" G= 19.0" Y+R= 3.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 5.0" OFF= 0.0% OFF= 9.6% OFF=79.1% ------------------------------------- C=115 sec G=102.0 sec = 88.7% Y=13.0 sec = 11.3% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Lane lWidth/I g/C I Service Rated Adj I I HCM ( L 190% Maxi Group ( Lanesl Regd Used ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I @C (vph) @E jVolumej v/c I Delay I S I Queue I SB Approach 4.5 A I TH 1 36/3 10.352 10.652 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 3407 1 3407 1 1452 10.426 1 4.5 1 A 1 272 ftp NB Approach 2.3 A TH 1 24/2 10.568 10.748 1 2758 1 2758 1 2088 10.757 ----------------- 1 2.1 1 A 1 426 ftp LT 1 12/1 10.000 10.070 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 311 1 341 1 137 10.402 1 4.6 f A 1 52 ftp WB Approach 47.0 D I TH 1 24/2 10.264 10.165 1 1 1 593 1 381 ---------------------- 10.632 1 46.9 1 D 1 257 ftl I LT 1 24/2 10.265 10.165 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ( 1 1 587 1 383 10.642 1 47.2 1 D 1 258 ftl Into the in Ci,P}0 Public CR)/ _ 199, Miramar Center Phases II and III 2003 W/ PROJECT - PM Peak Hour Analysis Existing Signal Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters 2 - Biscayne Blvd @ NE 14th ST 10/23/00 11:42:32 APPLABELS SB WB NB EB GRADES 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 PEDLEVELS 0 0 0 0 PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 20 20 20 20 BUSVOLUMES 18 10 5 5 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 0 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS RT TH LT 45 1258 69 0.0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.93 0.93 0.93 4 4 3 NO NO YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3573 1863 Phasing Parameters RT TH LT 28 19 45 0.0 12.0 12.0 0 1 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.74 0.74 0.74 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 1715 1401 SEQUENCES 41 ALL PERMISSIVES YES YES YES YES OVERLAPS NO NO NO NO CYCLES 80 150 10 GREENTIMES 7.00 76.00 20.00 38.00 YELLOWTIMES 3.00 5.00 4.00 0.00 CRITICALS 0 0 0 0 EXCESS 0 RT TH LT 72 2451 57 0.0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.97 0.97 0.97 4 4 3 NO NO YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3672 1863 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME RT TH LT 42 51 31 12.0 12.0 12.0 1 1 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.78 0.78 0.78 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 1552 1961 1403 Sub""ed into the pu:bll„: 11 In"connOCIVonon Wafter l CltY Clerk NONE NONE 0.00 1 0.0 0 01- 199 Miramar Center Phases II and III 10/23/00 2003 W/ PROJECT - PM Peak Hour Analysis 11:42:12 Existing Signal Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 2 - Biscayne Blvd @ NE 14th ST Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.84 Vehicle Delay 33.7 Level of Service C ------------------------------------- Sq 41 1 Phase 1 1 Phase 2 1 Phase 3 1 **/**------------------------------------- + I+++ I I 1 + I + + + I ++++1 /1\ I +> I<+ + +> 1 <++++I I I I v 1 ++++ I I I I I++++ v 1 North 1 <+ I <+ + +>1++++> I 1 I + I +++ I++++ I I + I +++ I v I ------------------------------------- G/C=0.061 1 G/C=0.661 1 G/C=0.174 1 G= 7.0" 1 G= 76.0" I G= 20.0" 1 I Y+R= 3.0" I Y+R= 5.0" 1 Y+R= 4.0" I OFF= 0.0% I OFF= 8.7% I OFF=79.1 % i ------------------------------------- C=115 sec G=103.0 sec = 89.6% Y=12.0 sec = 10.4% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I Lane (Width/I . g/C I Service Ratel Adj I I HCM I L 190% Maxi I Group I ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Lanesl Reqd Used I @C (vph) @E IVolumel v/c I Delay I S I Queue I SB Approach 6.8 A I TH+RTI 24/2 10.434 10.661 1 2361 -------------------------------- 1 2361 1 1401 10.593 1 5.5 1 A 1 384 fti I LT 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 12/1 10.037 10.061 1 101 1 163 1 74 10.409 1 31.6 1 C 1 80 ftl NB Approach 47.9 D I TH+RTI 24/2 10.682 10.661 1 2427 1 2427 1 2601 11.072 1 48.8 1 D 1 713 ftl I IT 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 12/1 10.000 10.061 1 307 1 337 1 59 10.175 1 4.3 1 A 1 25 ft1 WB Approach 41.3 D+ I TH+RTI 12/1 10.236 10.174 ------------------------------------------ 1 1 1 276 1 64 10.215 1 41.1 1 D+1 85 ft1 I LT 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 12/1 10.240 10.174 1 1 1 221 1 61 10.250 1 41.6 1 D+1 81 ft1 EB Approach 40.9 D+ I RT 1 12/1 10.236 10.174 1 1 1 --------------------------------------- 248 1 54 10.200 1 41.0 1 D+1 72 fti I TH 1 12/1 10.234 10.174 1 1 1 320 1 65 10.191 1 40.9 1 D+1 87 ft1 I LT 1 12/1 10.233 10.174 1 1 1 221.1 40 10.164 1 40.7 1 D+1 53 ftl ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SUbtY ftte/fiithe Publ;r ^'nto lltnn ftm n 9 - 199 Wftar Fneman CK, Miramar Center Phases II and III 2003 W/ PROJECT - PM Peak Hour Analysis Existing Signal Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # 3 - Biscayne Blvd `d NE 15th ST METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters 10/23/00 12:25:17 APPLABELS SB WB NB EB GRADES 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 PEDLEVELS 0 0 0 0 PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 20 20 20 20 BUSVOLUMES 18 10 5 5 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 0 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS RT TH LT 3 1325 85 0.0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.92 0.92 0.92 4 4 3 NO NO YES 5.0 5.0 3.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3590 1863 Phasing Parameters RT TH IT 50 276 85 0.0 12.0 12.0 0 1 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.91 0.91 0.91 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 1839 947 SEQUENCES 21 ALL PERMISSIVES YES YES YES OVERLAPS NO NO NO CYCLES 115 115 10 GREENTIMES 5.18 73.50 24.31 YELLOWTIMES 3.00 5.00 4.00 CRITICALS 3 8 5 EXCESS 0 YES NO RT TH LT 132 2254 14 0.0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.93 0.93 0.93 4 4 3 NO NO YES 5.0 5.0 3.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3658 360 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME r000In conn,,-, Wafter Foenan City Clerk RT TH LT 1 134 19 0.0 12.0 0.0 0 1 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.89 0.89 0.89 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 968 0 NONE NONE 0.00 1 0.0 0 01- 1.9 9 Miramar Center Phases II and III 10/23/00 2003 W/ PROJECT - PM Peak Hour Analysis 12:24:36 Existing Signal Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 3 - Biscayne Blvd @ NE 15th ST Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.89 Vehicle Delay 43.3 Level of Service D+ ---------------=--------------------- Sq 21 1 Phase 1 I Phase 2 1 Phase 3 1 **/** ----------------------------- 1++* I+++ I AI + + I + + + I **** /f\ 1<+ + *> 1<+ + +> I <****I I I v 1 v I ++++ I I I I 1++++ v I North I I <+ *>I++++> I I I + * * I++++ I I + * I v i - ----------- ------------------------- I G/C=0.045 1 G/C=0.639 I G/C=0.211 1 I G= 5.2" I G= 73.5" I G= 24.3" 1 l Y+R= 3.0" I Y+R= 5.0" 1 Y+R= 4.0" 1 1 OFF= 0.0% I OFF= 7.1% I OFF=75.4 % 1 ------------------------------------- C=115 sec G=103.0 sec = 89.6% Y=12.0 sec = 10.4% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I Lane [Width/1 . g/C I Service Ratel Adj I I HCM I L 190% Maxi I Group I Lanesl Reqd ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Used I @C (vph) @E lVolumel v/c I Delay I S I Queue I SB Approach 4.6 A I TH+RTI 24/2 10.441 10.710 --------------------------------------------- 1 2550 1 2550 1 1443 10.566 1 2.6 1 A 1 338 ftl I LT 1 12/1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10.049 10.045 1 88 1 136 1 92 10.605 1 36.5 I*D+l 96 ft1 NB Approach 60.8 E+ I TH+RTI 24/2 10.677 ---------------------------------------------------- 10.639 1 2338 1 2338 1 2566 11.098 1 61.1 I*E+l 748 ft1 I LT 1 12/1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10.246 10.639 1 187 1 230 1 15 10.065 1 7.9 1 A 1 25 ftl WB Approach 65.0 E+ I TH+RTI 12/1 10.319 10.211 1 ---------------------------------------------- 1 1 374 1 358 10.920 1 71.2 I*E 1 456 ftl I LT 1 12/1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10.269 10.211 1 1 1 179 1 93 10.465 1 41.4 1 D+1 119 ft1 EB Approach 69.7 E ILT+TH+RTI 12/1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10.318 ---------------------------------------------------- 10.211 1 1 1 184 1 173 10.844 1 69.7 1 E 1 221 ft1 SUbOtted into the pub,,f, r800rd In connection with rrft 42� on Wafter 01-- 199 pan City Clerk Miramar Center Phases II and III 2003 W/ PROJECT - PM Peak Hour Analysis Existing Signal Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # 4 - Biscayne Blvd @ NE 17th ST METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters 10/23/00 09:59:25 APPLABELS SB' WB NB EB GRADES 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 PEDLEVELS 0 0 0 0 PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 20 20 20 20 BUSVOLUMES 18 10 5 5 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 0 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS RT TH LT 42 1511 0 0.0 24.0 0.0 0 2 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.92 0.92 0.92 4 4 3 NO NO YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3576 0 Phasing Parameters RT TH LT 2 1 1 12.0 12.0 12.0 1 1 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.50 0.50 0.50 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM DOPT NORM 1520 1961 1863 SEQUENCES 17 ALL 0 PERMISSIVES YES YES YES YES OVERLAPS NO NO NO NO CYCLES 80 150 10 GREENTIMES 68.00 16.00 17.00 YELLOWTIMES 5.00 4.00 5.00 CRITICALS 0 0 0 EXCESS 0 5.0 5.0 RT TH LT 0 1914 42 0.0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.86 0.86 0.86 4 4 3 NO NO YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3688 195 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME RT TH LT 29 1 24 0.0 12.0 0.0 0 1 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.72 0.72 0.72 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM DOPT NORM 0 1555 0 5uIec Into in on pan City CIe NONE NONE 0.00 1 0.0 0 Miramar Center Phases II and III 10/23/00 2003 W/ PROJECT - PM Peak Hour Analysis 09:59:35 Existing Signal Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 4 - Biscayne Blvd @ NE 17th ST Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.91 Vehicle Delay 28.3 Level of Service C ------------------------------------- Sq 17 1 Phase 1 1 Phase 2 1 Phase 3 1 **/**------------------------------------- + + I I I I + + I ++++I /1\ 1<+ + I <++++1 I I I v I ++++I AI I I I v I++++ 1 North l <+ + I 1++++> I I I ++ I I++++ I I ++ I I v I ------------------------------------ G/C=0.591 I G/C=0.139 1 G/C=0.148 l I G= 68.0" I G= 16.0" 1 G= 17.0" 1 I Y+R= 5.0" 1 Y+R= 4.0" I Y+R= 5.0" l OFF= 0.0% I OFF=63.5% l OFF=80.9% i ------------------------------------- C=115 sec G=101.0 sec = 87.8% Y=14.0 sec = 12.2% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I Lane lWidth/I g/C I Service Ratel Adj I I HCM I L 190% Maxl I Group I Lanesl Regd Used I @C (vph) @E IVolumel v/c I Delay I S I Queue I ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SB Approach 14.1 B+ ----------------------------------------------- I TH+RTI 24/2 10.494 10.591 1 2115 1 2115 1 1688 10.798 1 14.1 1 B+1 558 ftl ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NB Approach 38.2 D+ ------------------------------------------------------ 1 TH 1 24/2 10.598 10.591 1 2181 1 2181 1 2226 11.021 1 38.6 1 D+1 735 ftI 1 LT 1 12/1 10.502 10.591 1 63 1 82 1 . 49 10.533 1 19.9 1 B 1 32 ftl ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WB Approach 42.7 D+ --------------------------------------------------------- 1 RT 1 12/1 10.221 10.139 1 1 1 186 1 4 10.019 1 42.8 1 D+1 25 ftl I TH 1 12/1 10.220 10.139 1 1 1 248 1 2 10.007 1 42.7 1 D+1 25 ftl 1 LT 1 12/1 10.220 10.139 1 1 1 234 1 2 10.008 1 42.7 1 D+1 25 ftl ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- EB Approach 44.7 D+ ---------------------------------------------------------- ILT+TH+RTI 12/1 10.241 10.148 1 1 1 205 1 74 10.322 1 44.7 1 D+1 102 ftl ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- S!db"Wtted into tile reloon! In connection with Wr`" -P�6- on� L Gt WWr Foam,n A 199 City Ciel Miramar Center Phases II and III 10/23/00 2003 W/ PROJECT - PM Peak Hour Analysis 10:43:57 Existing Signal Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # 5 - Biscayne Blvd @ NE 17th Terrac METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS SB WB NB EB GRADES 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 PEDLEVELS 0 0 0 0 PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 20 20 20 20 BUSVOLUMES 18 10 5 5 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 0 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS RT TH LT 10 1392 282 0.0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.91 0.91 0.91 4 4 3 NO NO YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3588 1863 Phasing Parameters RT TH LT 141 21 157 0.0 12.0 12.0 0 1 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.94 0.94 0.94 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 1636 1440 SEQUENCES 21 ALL PERMISSIVES YES YES YES OVERLAPS NO NO NO CYCLES 80 150 10 GREENTIMES 18.00 65.00 18.00 YELLOWTIMES 5.00 4.00 5.00 CRITICALS 0 0 0 EXCESS 0 YES NO RT TH LT 176 1794 11 0.0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.87 0.87 0.87 4 4 3 NO NO YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3639 326 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME RT TH LT 5 17 6 0.0 12.0 0.0 0 1 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.63 0.63 0.63 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 1552 0 SUbf0itted into the � � " `;? I r MOM in oonnec* ,�jj ajiih NONE NONE 0.00 1 0.0 0 Miramar Center Phases II and III 10/23/00 2003 W/ PROJECT - PM Peak Hour Analysis 10:39:03 Existing Signal Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 5 - Biscayne Blvd @ NE 17th Terrac Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.86 Vehicle Delay 43.8 Level of Service D+ ------------------------------------- Sq 21 Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 **/**------------------------------------- j< + +><+ + +> <++++� v v ^ ++++ ^++++ v North <+ + +>1++++> + + + v ----------- ------------------------ G/C=0.157 G/C=0.565 G/C=0.157 G= 18.0" G= 65.0" G= 18.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 4.0" Y+R= 5.0" OFF= 0.0% OFF=20.0 % ------------------------------------- OFF=80.0 % C=115 sec G=101.0 sec = 87.8% Y=14.0 sec = 12.2% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Lane Width/1 g/C I Service Rate Adj I I HCM I L 190% Maxi Group I Lanese Reqd Used ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I @C (vph) @E jVolumej v/c I Delay I S I Queue SB Approach 10.3 B+ TH+RTI 24/2 10.461 10.765 ------------------------------------------ 1 2745 1 2745 1 1541 10.561 1 0.8 1 A 1 292 ftl LT 1 12/1 10.232 10.157 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 206 1 350 1 310 10.861 1 57.5 1 E+1 312 ftp NB Approach 69.4 E ---------------------------------------------------- TH+RTI 24/2 10.613 10.565 1 2048 1 2057 1 2264 11.101 1 69.7 1 E 1 796 ftp I LT 1 12/1 10.246 10.565 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 139 1 178 1 13 10.071 1 11.5 1 B+1 25 ftj WB Approach 55.5 E+ --------------------------------------------------- TH+RTI 12/1 10.268 10.157 1 1 1 232 1 172 10.672 1 52.4 1 D 1 235 ftj LT 1 12/1 10.274 10.157 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 1 1 201 1 167 10.742 1 58.7 1 E+1 228 ftp EB Approach 42.5 D+ ------------------------------------------------------ ALT+TH+RTI 12/1 10.233 10.157 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 1 1 219 1 45 10.185 1 42.5 1 D+1 61 ftp "On"Od OtO the 1�conr� ": :, a .,a r r i ,." 199 lift � on Wa4er FOGman C4 Clerk Miramar Center Phases II and III 2003 W/ PROJECT OPTIMUM SPLIT- PM Peak Hour Analysis Existing Signal Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # 6 - Biscayne Blvd @ NE 19th ST METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters 10/23/00 10:36:05 APPLABELS SB WB NB EB GRADES 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 PEDLEVELS 0 0 0 0 PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 20 20 20 20 BUSVOLUMES 18 10 5 5 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 0 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS RT TH LT 1 1813 216 0.0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.90 0.90 0.90 4 4 3 NO NO YES 5.0 5.0 3.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3591 1863 Phasing Parameters RT TH LT 212 89 42 12.0 12.0 0.0 1 1 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.92 0.92 0.92 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 1520 1542 0 SEQUENCES 61 ALL PERMISSIVES YES YES YES YES OVERLAPS NO NO NO NO CYCLES 115 115 10 GREENTIMES 12.20 0.00 69.59 20.21 YELLOWTIMES 3.00 0.00 5.00 5.00 CRITICALS 3 0 8 4 EXCESS 0 RT TH IT 4 2075 13 0.0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.87 0.87 0.87 4 4 3 NO NO YES 5.0 5.0 3.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3687 1863 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME RT TH LT 24 81 32 0.0 12.0 0.0 0 1 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.91 0.91 0.91 3 3 3 YES YES YES 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 1498 0 NONE NONE 0.00 1 0.0 0 Submitted Into the public reQan connects n with i�eRt/ on,2L�6f_Jsl1- Waller Foeman City Clerk n -- 0 Miramar Center Phases II and III 10/23/00 2003 W/ PROJECT OPTIMUM SPLIT- PM Peak Hour Analysis 10:35:53 Existing Signal Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 6 - Biscayne Blvd @ NE 19th ST Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.97 Vehicle Delay 41.8 Level of Service D+ Sq 61 /I\ I I North I ------------------------------------------------- Phase 1 1 Phase 2 1 Phase 3 1 Phase 4 1 ------------------------------------------------- 1i <+++> v <++++ I I ^ I ^ I++++ v 1 l <+ I <+ + +>1 <+ * *>1++++> I I + 1 + + + 1 + * * 1 ++++ 1 1 + 1 +++I +**1 v I ------------------------------------------------ G/C=0.106 I G/C=0.000 I G/C=0.605 I G/C=0.176 l G= 12.2" I G= 0.0" I G= 69.6" I G= 20.2" l I Y+R= 3.0" I Y+R= 0.0" I Y+R= 5.0" I Y+R= 5.0" OFF= 0.0% I OFF=13 .2 % I OFF=13 .2 % I OFF=78.1 % l ------------------------------------------------- C=115 sec G=102.0 sec = 88.7% Y=13.0 sec = 11.3% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I Lane (Width/1 • g/C I Service Ratel Adj I I HCM I L 190% Magi I Group I ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Lanesl Reqd Used I @C (vph) @E (Volume) v/c I Delay I S I Queue I SB Approach 25.3 C+ I TH+RTI 24/2 10.564 10.605 1 2173 ----------------------------------------- 1 2173 1 2015 10.927 1 19.9 1 B 1 643 ftl I LT 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 12/1 10.192 10.106 1 152 1 251 1 240 10.902 1 70.7 I*E 1 237 ft1 NB Approach 54.0 D I TH+RTI 24/2 10.634 10.605 - --------------------------------------------- 1 2231 1 2231 1 2390 11.071 1 54.2 I*D 1 763 ft1 I LT 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 12/1 10.002 10.106 1 156 1 252 1 15 10.056 1 20.2 1 C+1 25 ft) WB Approach 60.3 E+ I RT 1 12/1 10.292 10.176 1 1 ------------------------------------------ 1 245 1 230 10.861 1 69.8 I*E 1 306 ftl ILT+TH 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 12/1 10.263 10.176 1 1 1 249 1 143 10.528 1 45.0 1 D+1 191 ftl EB Approach 46.4 D ILT+TH+RTI 12/1 10.266 --------------------------------------------------- 10.176 1 1 1 241 1 150 10.570 1 46.4 1 D 1 200 fti ------------------------------------------ ------------------------------- r6o" in bm F22L 42;� on Walter Foemari 01- 1.9 9 City Clerk Miramar Center Phases II and III 2003 W/ PROJECT - PM Peak Hour Analysis Existing Signal Phasing 10/26/00 09:06:42 SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.001 - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICt C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters APPLABELS GRADES PEDLEVELS PARKINGSIDES PARKVOLUMES BUSVOLUMES RIGHTTURNONREDS Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS 7 - Bayshore @ NE 13th ST SB WB NB EB 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 NONE NONE NONE NONE 20 20 20 20 18 10 5 5 0 0 0 0 RT TH LT 295 286 0 12.0 12.0 0.0 1 1 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.87 0.87 0.87 4 4 3 NO NO YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM DOPT NORM 1469 1961 0 Phasing Parameters SEQUENCES 11 ALL PERMISSIVES YES YES OVERLAPS NO NO CYCLES 80 150 GREENTIMES 30.00 42.00 YELLOWTIMES 4.00 4.00 CRITICALS 0 0 EXCESS 0 RT TH LT 194 595 9 0.0 48.0 0.0 0 4 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.82 0.82 0.82 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 6804 0 YES YES NO NO 10 RT TH LT 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.96 0.96 0.96 4 4 3 NO NO YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 0 0 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME bub"tted ill" ff►e Public ft: =1nar e r City Cre RT TH LT 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.90 0.90 0.90 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 0 0 NONE NONE 0.00 1 0.0 0 Miramar Center Phases II and III 10/26/00 2003 W/ PROJECT - PM Peak Hour Analysis 09:06:14 Existing Signal Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 7 - Bayshore @ NE 13th ST Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.38 Vehicle Delay 15.0 Level of Service B Sq 11 /I\ i 1 North I ------------------- Phase 1 1 Phase 2 ++ I l + + 1 ++++1 1<+ + I <++++I I v 1 ++++1 I I v I ------------------------- G/C=0.375 1 G/C=0.525 1 1 G= 30.0" 1 G= 42.0" 1 1 Y+R= 4.0" ( Y+R= 4.0" 1 1 OFF= 0.0% I OFF=42.5 % 1 ------------------------- C= 80 sec G= 72.0 sec = 90.0% Y= 8.0 sec = 10.0% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I Lane lWidth/I . g/C I Service Ratel Adj I I HCM I L 190% Maxi I Group I Lanesl Reqd ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Used I @C (vph) @E IVolumel v/c I Delay I S I Queued SB Approach 21.5 C+ I RT 1 12/1 10.309 10.375 1 462 1 --------------------------------------- 551 1 339 10.615 1 23.8 1 C+1 238 ftl I TH 1 12/1 10.246 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10.375 1 642 1 735 1 329 10.448 1 19.2 1 B 1 231 ftl WB Approach 10.6 B+ ILT+TH+RTI 48/4 10.181 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- 10.525 1 3572 1 3572 1 '974 10.273 1 10.6 1 B+1 130 ftI SubaDitted into the public In �b t 8#,er Foemarl City Clerk oi- 199 Miramar Center Phases II and III 2003 W/ PROJECT - PM Peak Hour Analysis Existing Signal Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters 8 - Bayshore @ NE 14th ST 10/23/00 09:49:07 APPLABELS SB WB NB EB GRADES 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 PEDLEVELS 0 0 0 0 PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 20 20 20 20 BUSVOLUMES 18 10 5 5 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 0 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS RT TH LT 41 489 3 0.0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.97 0.97 0.97 4 4 3 NO NO YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3550 1863 Phasing Parameters RT TH IT 9 23 48 0.0 24.0 0.0 0 2 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.79 0.79 0.79 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 2752 0 SEQUENCES 41 ALL PERMISSIVES YES YES YES OVERLAPS NO NO NO CYCLES 80 150 10 GREENTIMES 10.00 38.00 19.00 YELLOWTIMES 3.00 5.00 5.00 CRITICALS 0 0 0 EXCESS 0 YES NO RT TH IT 3 164 12 0.0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.92 0.92 0.92 4 4 3 NO NO YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3679 1863 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME RT TH LT 52 21 89 0.0 24.0 0.0 0 2 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.89 0.89 0.89 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 2738 0 submitted !"t o the (n COd1ne,o, 51 on K'aWr Fran City Clerk NONE NONE 0.00 1 0.0 0 01-- 199 Miramar Center Phases II and III 10/23/00 2003 W/ PROJECT - PM Peak Hour Analysis 09:49:21 Existing Signal Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 8 - Bayshore @ NE 14th ST Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.26 Vehicle Delay 14.4 Level of Service B+ ------------------------------------- Sq 41 1 Phase 1 I Phase 2 1 Phase 3 1 **/**------------------------------------- + 1+++ 1 I 1 + 1 + + + 1 ++++I /I\ I +> I<+ + +> 1 <++++1 I I I v I ++++I I I I 1++++ v 1 North 1 <+ I <+ + +>1++++> I I I + 1 +++ I++++ 1 I + I +++ I v 1 ------------------------------------ G/C=0.125 1 G/C=0.475 1 G/C=0.237 1 1 G= 10.0" 1 G= 38.0" 1 G= 19.0" 1 1 Y+R= 3.0" 1 Y+R= 5.0" 1 Y+R= 5.0" 1 OFF= 0.0% 1 OFF=16.3% 1 OFF=70.0% I ------------------------------------- C= 80 sec G= 67.0 sec = 83.8% Y=13.0 sec = 16.3% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I Lane (Width/I g/C I Service Rate1 Adj I I HCM I L 190% Maxi I Group I Lanesi Regd ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Used I @C (vph) @E IVolumel v/c I Delay I S I Queue I SB Approach 10.9 B+ I TH+RTI 24/2 10.214 10.475 ----------------------------------------- 1 1659 1 1686 1 546 10.324 1 11.0 1 B+1 161 ft1 I LT 1 12/1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10.000 10.125 1 855 1 879 1 3 10.003 1 4.6 1 A 1 25 ft1 NB Approach 9.1 A I TH+RTI 24/2 10.123 ------------------------------- 10.475 1 1723 1 1748 1 .181 ---------------------- 10.104 1. 9.4 1 A 1 53 fti I LT 1 12/1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10.000 10.125 1 613 1 640 1 13 10.020 1 4.8 1 A 1 25 ft1 WB Approach 24.3 C+ ILT+TH+RTI 24/2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10.095 10.237 1 ---------------------------------------------- 516 1 654 1 101 10.154 1 24.3 1 C+1 43 fti EB Approach 25.1 C+ ILT+TH+RTI 24/2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10.121 ------------------------------------------------------- 10.237 1 512 1 650 1 182 10.280 1 25.1 1 C+1 78 fti 800 ted Oto tt,;e pu71;,r recoq,ln COon Water Faernan 01— 199 City Clerk i� Miramar Center Phases II and III 2003 W/ PROJECT - PM Peak Hour Analysis Existing Signal Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters for Int # 9 - Bayshore @ NE 15th ST METROAREA NONCBD SIMULATION PERIOD 15 LEVELOFSERVICE C S NODELOCATION 0 0 Approach Parameters 10/23/00 09:50:33 APPLABELS SB WB NB EB GRADES 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 PEDLEVELS 0 0 0 0 PARKINGSIDES NONE NONE NONE NONE PARKVOLUMES 20 20 20 20 BUSVOLUMES 18 10 5 5 RIGHTTURNONREDS 0 0 0 0 Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS RT TH LT 44 473 21 0.0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.96 0.96 0.96 4 4 3 NO NO YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3544 1863 Phasing Parameters RT TH LT 37 313 2 12.0 12.0 12.0 1 1 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.90 0.90 0.90 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 1520 1961 1863 SEQUENCES 44 ALL PERMISSIVES YES YES YES YES OVERLAPS NO NO NO NO CYCLES 80 150 10 GREENTIMES 9.00 23.00 6.00 25.00 YELLOWTIMES 3.00 5.00 3.00 6.00 CRITICALS 0 0 0 0 EXCESS 0 RT TH LT 38 170 8 0.0 24.0 0.0 0 2 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.83 0.83 0.83 4 4 3 NO NO YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3478 0 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME RT TH LT 27 267 65 0.0 12.0 12.0 0 1 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.88 0.88 0.88 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1900 2000 2000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 1895 1863 NONE NONE 0.00 1 0.0 0 s " ttod int -0 the put"I" MMM in conne „° r►� on fter Foeman City Clerk 01.- 1.99 Miramar Center Phases II and III 10/23/00 2003 W/ PROJECT - PM Peak Hour Analysis 09:50:46 Existing Signal Phasing SIGNAL97/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages for Int # 9 - Bayshore @ NE 15th ST Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.47 Vehicle Delay 23.7 Level of Service C+ ------------------------------------------------- Sq 44 1 Phase 1 I Phase 2 1 Phase 3 1 Phase 4 **/**--------------------------- ---------------------- ++++ A +><+ + +> <++++� v ^ ++++� ^ ^++++ v++++ v North <+ <+ + +>1++++> + + + +++++ + ------------------------------------------------- +++I v G/C=0.112 G/C=0.287 G/C=0.075 G/C=0.313 G= 9.0" G= 23.0" G= 6.0" G= 25.0" Y+R= 3.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 3.0" Y+R= 6.0" OFF= 0.0% OFF=15.0 ------------------------------------------------- % OFF=50.0 % OFF=61.3 % C= 80 sec G= 63.0 sec = 78.8% Y=17.0 sec = 21.3% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Lane Width/I g/C I Service Rate Adj I I HCM I L 190% Maxi Group I Lanese Regd ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Used I @C (vph) @E jVolumej v/c I Delay I S I Queue SB Approach 25.3 C+ ----------------------------------------------------------- TH+RTI 24/2 10.213 10.287 1 857 1 1019 1 539 10.529 1 25.8 1 C+1 216 ftp LT 1 12/1 10.000 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10.112 1 496 1 555 1 22 10.040 1 11.8 1 B+1 25 ft) NB Approach 22.5 C+ ------------------------------------------------------------ ILT+TH+RTI 24/2 10.147 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10.287 1 849 1 1011 1 .261 10.258 1 22.5 1 C+1 105 ftp WB Approach 23.7 C+ RT 1 12/1 10.093 10.313 1 383 1 475 1 41 10.086 1 19.5 1 B 1 32 ft I TH 1 12/1 10.237 10.313 1 510 1 613 1 348 10.568 1 24.2 1 C+1 269 ftp LT ( 12/1 10.000 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10.075 1 333 1 393 1 2 10.005 ( 12.6 1 B+1 25 ftp EB Approach 22.3 C+ --------------------------------------------------------------- I TH+RTI 12/1 10.237 10.313 1 490 1 592 1 334 10.564 1 24.2 1 C+1 258 ft) LT 1 12/1 10.000 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10.075 1 322 1 381 1 74 10.194 1 13.5 1 B+1 45 ftj 800416"d into the pub!#r MIse co ",rt01 r Foemain r" 199 city c,.pri( HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1g BS-17TFP.HCO Page 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 ----------------------------------- Streets: (N -S) N.BAYSHORE DR. (E -W) NE 17TH TERR. Major Street Direction.... EW Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) Analyst................... TI. Date of Analysis.......... 10/26/0 Other Information ......... 2003 W/PROJECT-PM PEAK Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection ----- ----------------------- EastboundWestbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes Stop/Yield Volumes PHF Grade MC' s ( % ) SU/RV's (a) CV's (o) PCE' s ------------ 0 1 < 1 N 4 453 .84 .84 0 0 > 1 0 N 22 130 .73 .73 0 1.10 ---------------- 1 0 1 354 92 .85 .85 0 1.10 1.10 ---------------- Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver ------------------------------------------------------------------ Gap (tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road 5.00 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.00 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 6.50 3.40 f on Irlto the Aub1Jc t rrnet,10n on °Man C"Y C/erko I HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1g BS-17TFP.HCO Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection ------------------------------------------------------- Step 1: RT from Minor Street NB SB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 5 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1377 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1377 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.91 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 2: LT from Major Street WB EB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 544 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 944 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 944 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.97 TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) (sec/veh) --------- Major LT Shared Lane Prob. ------ 767 of Queue -Free State: 0.96 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 4: LT from Minor Street NB SB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 212 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 798 Major LT, Minor TH 9.8 Impedance Factor: 0.96 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.96 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.96 Movement Capacity: (pcph) -------------------------------------------------------- 767 Intersection.Performance Summary Wo .. , if`i ����E Water Fb�mZ CV cert t�+x.99 Avg. 950 Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph)(sec/veh) (veh) ------- ----- (sec/veh) --------- -------- ------ NB L 458 ------ 767 ------------- 11.6 4.6 C 9.8 NB R 119 1377 2.9 0.2 A WB L 33 944 4.0 0.0 A 0.6 Intersection Delay = 4.2 sec/veh Wo .. , if`i ����E Water Fb�mZ CV cert t�+x.99 HCS: Unsignalizea Intersections Release 2.1g BS-17TFP.HCO Page 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 ------ ----- Streets: (N -S) N.BAYSHORE DR. (E -W) NE 17TH TERR. Major Street Direction.... EW Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) Analyst................... TI Date of Analysis.......... 10/26/0 Other Information ......... 2003 W/PROJECT-PM PEAK Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R __J No. Lanes Stop/Yield Volumes PHF Grade MC's (°s) SU/RV's (o) CV's (%) PCE' s ------------ 0 1 < 1 N 4 453 .84 .84 0 0 > 1 0 N 22 130 .73 .73 0 1.10 ---------------- 1 0 1 354 92 .85 .85 0 1.10 1.10 ---------------- Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver ------------------------------------------------------------------ Gap (tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road 5.00 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.00 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 6.50 3.40 In r mo ��� °- 199 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1g BS-17TFP.HCO Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection ------------------------------=------------------------- Step 1: RT from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 5 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1377 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1377 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.91 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 2: LT from Major Street WB EB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 544 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 944 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 944 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.97 TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) Major LT Shared Lane Prob. of Queue -Free State: -------------------------------------------------------- 0.96 Step 4: LT from Minor Street NB SB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 212 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 798 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0.96 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.96 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.96 Movement Capacity: (pcph) -------------------------------------------------------- 767 Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95%- 5%Flow FlowMove Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay, Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph)(sec/veh) (veh) -------- ------ (sec/veh) ------ ------------- NB L 458 767 11.6 ------- ----- 4.6 C --------- 9.8 NB R 119 1377 2.9 0.2 A WB L 33 944 4.0 0.0 A 0.6 Intersection Delay = 4.2 sec/veh SubrMtted into the Public recoad in corIne :on Ali n y2 on Wafter ; cernan City Clero _ 1. 9 9 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1g 4W-18FP.HCO Page 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392 -0378 ----------------- ---------- Streets: (N -S) NE 4TH AVE(WESTSIDE) (E -W) NE 18TH ST. Major Street Direction.... NS Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) Analyst................... TI Date of Analysis.......... 10/26/0 Other Information ......... 2003'W/ PROJECT -PM PEAK Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection Northbound Southbound EastboundWestbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes Stop/Yield Volumes PHF Grade MC' s (U ) SU/RV' s CV,s (o) PCE, s ------------ 0 > 1 < 0 N 49 227 2 .5 .5 .5 0 1.10 0 > 1 0 N 2 214 .77 .77 0 1.10 ---------------- 0 1 1 21 21 .64 .64 0 1.10 1.10 ---------------- Adjustment Factors 0 > 2 0 2 20 .66 .66 0 1.10 1.10 --------------- Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver ------------------------------------------------------------------ Gap (tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road 5.00 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.00 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 6.50 3.40 Sytttc iFOOD cy Public conn; �r► with ---? on Walter FO+an Cit' Clerk 0i HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1g 4W-18FP.HCO Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection -------------------------------------------------------- Step 1: RT from Minor Street WB EB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 278 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1001 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1001 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.96 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 2: LT from Major Street SB NB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 458 278 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1037 1264 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1037 1264 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 1.00 0.91 TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 1700 RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 Major LT Shared Lane Prob. of Queue -Free State: -------------------------------------------------------- 1.00 0.88 Step 3: TH from Minor Street -------------------------------------------------------- WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 835 837 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 398 397 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.88 0.88 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 350 349 Prob. of Queue -Free State: -------------------------------------------------------- 0.91 0.90 Step 4: LT from Minor Street -------------------------------------------------------- WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 868 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 333 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0.79 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.84 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.81 Movement Capacity: (pcph) -------------------------------------------------------- 269 "b"tted Into the PUhllc in CCait :_� €�� �.,�aa vilith on a� Al— 199 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1g 4W-18FP.HCO Page 3 Intersection -Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph)(sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh) -------- EB T ------ 36 ------ ------ ------ 349 11.5 0.3 C 7.6 EB R 36 1001 3.7 0.0 A WE L 3 269 > 341 11.8 0.3 C WE T 33 350 > 11.8 NB L 108 1264 3.1 0.2 A 0.5 SB L 3 1037 3.5 0.0 A 0.0 Intersection Delay = 1.3 sec/veh 199 511b"ted into 19001 tln�co,,,- c on x W,21lterrs j °1►an CitY Clerk HCS: Unsignalizea Intersections Release 2.1g 4E-18FP.HCO Page 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 ---------------------------------- Streets: (N -S) NE 4TH AVE(EASTSIDE) (E -W) NE 18TH ST Major Street Direction.... EW Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) Analyst................... TI Date of Analysis.......... 10/26/0 Other Information ......... 2003 W/ PROJECT -PM PEAK Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection - ---- --------------------- EastboundWestbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes Stop/Yield Volumes PHF Grade MC' s M) ) SU/RV's (s) CV's (a) PCE's ------------ 0 1 0 N 19 .64 0 0 1 0 N 23 .66 0 --------------II Adjustment Factors 1 0 0 43 .77 0 1.10 --------------- Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver ------------------------------------------------------------------ Gap (tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road 5.00 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.00 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 6.50 3.40 Subfttied endo the public (*ronC®2�".�4Oi 199 i +l'or Foaman Cid Clerk HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1g 4E-18FP.HCO Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection ------------------------------7------------------------- Step 1: RT from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 30 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1337 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1337 Prob. of Queue -Free State:. 0.99 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 4: LT from Minor Street NB SB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 73 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 961 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 1.00 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 1.00 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.99 Movement Capacity: (pcph) -------------------------------------------------------- 948 Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95%_ Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph)(sec/veh) -------- ------ ------ ------ (veh) -------------- ----- (sec/veh) --------- 2.7 NB R 18 1337 2.7 0.0 A SB L 62 948 4.1 0.1 A Intersection Delay = 2.1 sec/veh ` Ub"fid �n�� iiae itemin cpublic on u% W eek Fcwm an City Clerk 4.1 0 �- 199 MIRAMAR CENTRE PHASE II AND III MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT SITE UTILITY STUDY Prepared for Florida East Coast Realty By: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 420 Lincoln Road Miami Beach, Florida 33139 91- 199 f�� Into the �� �o„no("n Public on n with �zkar F,,� MI RAMAR CENTER PHASE II Site Utility Study Introduction The Miramar Center Phase II project is a 56 -story apartment building, consisting of ground floor lobby, restaurant, convenience retail, and mechanical/electrical support areas, a 9 -story parking garage, and a 635 unit residential tower located in between N. Bayshore Drive, NE 4' Avenue and NE 17'x' Terrace in the City of Miami. The parking garage will provide 667 parking spaces. The total site consists of 1.61 Acres (Phase II and III). I. Drainage Existing Drainage The site is currently vacant, and drainage consists of surface percolation with potential overflow to the adjacent City right-of-way during more extreme rainfall events. Proposed Drainage System The primary drainage system forthe project will consist of drainage wells, which will allow the storm runoff to be fully contained and disposed of on site. The project will be designed consistent with a 5 -year design storm, DERM Water Control section D-4, part 2 of Miami -Dade County Public Works Department. It is currently anticipated that three (3) 24" drainage wells will provide sufficient capacity for the project. The final drainage design for the project will provide a drainage system consistent with the above criteria, and consistent with all approval and permitting requirements for the project. Preliminary drainage computations for the project are provided in Table 1, below, which includes the basis for design. Submitted into the re ZZ��In —acorn"v` "V th on Wel crF°Larnan Miramar Center (Phase II and III) Site Utility Study Page y 91- 199 Table 1 Drainage Calculations Runoff Generation Total Net Site Area (Phase II) 41,762 sf = 0.96 Acres (not including ext. wall areas) Total Impervious Area (Incl. Wall areas) 79,949 sf = 1.83 Acres Roof Area 36,800 sf = 0.84 Acres Roads/Sidewalks 3,249 sf = 0.07 Acres Exterior Wall Area (1/3 NE Corner WallAreas) 39,900 sf = 0.91 Acres [(385'x 190') + ((95' x 320') + (170' x 95'))]/3 Pervious Area (green areas) 1,713 sf =0.04 Acres Average Runoff Coefficient Impervious Site Area = 1.83 x 0.95 Pervious Site Area = 0.04 x 0.30 Average Runoff Coefficient, C = (1.738+0.012) / 1.87 = 0.94 Design Storm Time of Concentration Rainfall Intensity = 1.738 0.012 5 Year Return Frequency 10 min. 6.10 in/hr Peak Runoff Q = CIA = (0.94)(6.10)(1.87) = 10.72 cfs Assume each 24" diameter well flows at 800 g.p.m./per ft of head = 13.33 gps = 1.78 cfs Peak Runoff/Flow Per Well = 10.72 cfs/(Ave. 3 ft of head x 1.78 cfs) = 2.01 wells Provide 3 - 24" Diameter Wells Detention Tank Design Criteria: 1.5 minute (90 sec) detention time per detention structure Volume of Tank required for (10.72 cfs x 90 sec.)/3 = 322 cubic ft / tank or 2408 gallon each Interior Tank Dimensions: 8' (width) x 3' (height) x 14' (length) = 336 cubic feet each Provide 1 tank for each well, of 336 c.f. volume each Miramar (enter (Phase II and III) Site Utility Study MR, Q � 0 th'O Aublio Page 3 } 00on n with w'r Fran 0 1— 199 City C II. Water Distribution System The Miami -Dade Water and Sewer Department (MDWASD) owns and operates the following water mains in the vicinity of the project. Location Between Water Main(s) NE 17'h Terrace Along NE17th Terr to Intersection of N. 16" D. I. Bayshore (Southwest side of the Project) N. Bayshore Dr. NE 17th Terrace. to NE 18th St. 16" D.I. (West side of the Project) Alley Between NE 4' Ave & N. Bayshore Dr. 4" C.I. (East side of the Project) The water connections to serve the project will be installed at NE 17 Terrace, near the intersection with N. Bayshore Dr., from the existing 16" water main. The connections will consist of fire line supply, domestic and irrigation water. No on-site fire, domestic water, or irrigation wells are planned for the project. &;Ubft#Od into th f§� Llnconn�ieuclffl �ubil� hem nitr�tAf'1�1�� Water FoWIAM Miramar Center (Phase II and III) Site Utility Study Page 4 0 199 III. Sanitary Sewer Collection System The Miami -Dade Water and Sewer Department (MDWASD) owns and operates the following sanitary sewer mains in the vicinity of the project. Location Between Sanitary Sewer Main(s) NE 181' Street NE 4th Ave. to N. Bayshore Dr. 12" (Gravity) (North side of the Project) NE 17'f' Terrace Along NE 17'x' Terr to Intersection of N. 12" (Gravity) Bayshore Dr. 10" (Gravity) (South side of the Project) N. Bayshore Dr. NE 17th Terrace to NE 18th Street 72" San. Sewer (East side of the Project) Interceptor Alley NE 17'x' Terrace to NE 181' Street 8" (Gravity) (Within Project) The sanitary sewer connection for the project will be made to the existing 12" sanitary sewer gravity main at NE 17'x' Terrace. No sanitary sewer pump station will be built on-site to serve this project. IV. Solid Waste Generation Solid waste generated by this project will be collected in standard on-site containers for refuse and recyclables. Regular pick-up service will be provided either by private hauling companies and/or by the City of Miami Solid Waste Department, who will transport the waste to Miami -Dade County's or private disposal and recycling facilities. The volumes of solid waste projected to be generated by the project are shown in Table 4, below. Table 4 Project Solid Waste Generation Phase II - 560,963 s.f. (Residential) 18,112 s.f. (Non-residential) (560,963+18,112) s.f. 9 4lbs/100 sq. ft/day = 23,163 lbs/day = 11.6 tons/day Miramar Center (Phase II and III)�IbntothO pi��th3 Site Utility Study td In Conn G Page 5 on ie�" twfl#h 0 99 MIRAMAR CENTER PHASE III Site Utility Study , Introduction The Miramar Center Phase III project is a 7 -story building, consisting of ground floor administrative and mechanical/electrical support spaces, 2 -stories for parking, 4 -stories for institutional purposes and an open roof terrace with a pool, located in between N. Bayshore Drive, NE 4' Avenue and NE 17'x' Terrace in the City of Miami. The parking garage will provide 96 parking spaces. The total site consists of 1.61 Acres (Phase II and III). I. Drainage Existing Drainage The site is currently vacant, and drainage consists of surface percolation with potential overflow to the adjacent City right-of-way during more extreme rainfall events. Proposed Drainage System The primary drainage system forthe project will consist of drainage wells, which will allow the storm runoff to be fully contained and disposed of on site. The project will be designed consistent with a 5 -year design storm, DERM Water Control section D-4, part 2 of Miami -Dade County Public Works Department. It is currently anticipated that one (1) 24" drainage well will provide sufficient capacity for the project. The final drainage design for the project will provide a drainage system consistent with the above criteria, and consistent with all approval and permitting requirements for the project. Preliminary drainage computations for the project are provided in Table 1, below, which includes the basis for design. Submitted into the public �In? connect n vbith on Warr Foeman Miramar Center (Phase II and III) Site Utility Study Page b 01- 199 Table 1 Drainage Calculations Runoff Generation Total Net Site Area (Phase III) (Does not include ext. wall areas) 28,568 sf = 0.66 Acres Total Impervious Area (Incl. Wall areas) 33,998 sf =0.78 Acres Roof Area 19,235 sf = 0.44 Acres Road/Sidewalks 6,621 sf = 0.15 Acres Exterior Wall Area (1/3 NE Corner Wall Areas) 8142 sf = 0.19 Acres (((124'x86') + (160'x86')))/3 Pervious Area (green areas) 2,712 sf = 0.06 Acres Average Runoff Coefficient Impervious Site Area = .78 x 0.95 = 0.74 Pervious Site Area = .06 x 0.30 = 0.02 Average Runoff Coefficient, C = (0.71+0.02) /.84 = 0.94 Design Storm 5 Year Return Frequency Time of Concentration 10 min. Rainfall Intensity 6.10 in/hr Peak Runoff Q = CIA = (0.94)(6.10)(0.84) = 4.82 cfs Assume each 24" diameter well flows at 800 g.p.m./per ft of head = 13.33 gps = 1.78 cfs Peak Runoff/Flow Per Well = 4.82 cfs/(Ave. 3 ft of head x 1.78 cfs) = 0.90 wells Provide 1 - 24" Diameter Wells Detention Tank Design Criteria: 1.5 minute (90 sec) detention time per detention structure Volume of Tank required for (4.82 cfs x 90 sec.)/1 = 439 cubic ft / tank or 3282 gallon each Interior Tank Dimensions: 7' (width) x 5' (height) x 13' (length) = 455 cubic feet each Provide 1 tank for each well, of 455 c.f. volume each Miramar Center (Phase II and III) Site utility study Sui#itted into the public Page 7 recoi4 jn connedn with Z12 -> /Ar L lk��Mnr Fran 01-- 199 r1ork II. Water Distribution System The Miami -Dade Water and Sewer Department (MDWASD) owns and operates the following water mains in the vicinity of the project. Location Between Water Main(s) NE 1 Ph Terrace Along NEI 7th Terrto Intersection of N. 16" D.I. Bayshore (Southwest side of the Project) N. Bayshore Dr. NE 17th Terrace. to NE 18th St. 16" D. I. (West side of the Project) Alley Between NE 4' Ave & N. Bayshore Dr. 4" C.I. (East side of the Project) The water connections to serve the project will be installed at NE 17 Terrace, near the intersection with N. Bayshore Dr., from the existing 16" water main. The connections will consist of fire line supply, domestic and irrigation water. No on-site fire, domestic water, or irrigation wells are planned for the project. Sub"Wted into the Public ton n ,Cos?r►e icon with Weller Foeman City Clerk Miramar Center (Phase II and III) Site Utility Study Page 8 n1 -r 199 III. Sanitary Sewer Collection System The Miami -Dade Water and Sewer Department (MDWASD) owns and operates the following sanitary sewer mains in the vicinity of the project. Location Between Sanitary Sewer Main(s) NE 181' Street NE 4th Ave. to N. Bayshore Dr. 12" (Gravity) (North side of the Project) NE 17' Terrace Along NE 17'x' Terr to Intersection of N. 12" (Gravity) Bayshore Dr. 10" (Gravity) (South side of the Project) N. Bayshore Dr. NE 17' Terrace to NE 18'h Street 72" San. Sewer (East side of the Project) Interceptor Alley NE 17'x' Terrace to NE 18'f' Street 8" (Gravity) (Within Project) The sanitary sewer connection for the project will be made to the existing 12" sanitary sewer gravity main at NE 17'x' Terrace orthe lateral/service from the Phase II property. No sanitary sewer pump station will be built on-site to serve this project. IV. Solid Waste Generation Solid waste generated by this project will be collected in standard on-site containers for refuse and recyclables. Regular pick-up service will be provided either by private hauling companies and/or by the City of Miami Solid Waste Department, who will transport the waste to Miami -Dade County's or private disposal and recycling facilities. The volumes of solid waste projected to be generated by the project are shown in Table 4, below. Table 4 Project Solid Waste Gene ratior-SUb1njfted into t€ ( Public recd in con it,<,, %) with Phase III - 0 s.f. (Residential) y �' 92,260 s.f. (Non-residential) hem on We gar F ,,,�man (92,260) sf a@ 4lbs/100 sq. ft/day = 3,691 lbs/day = 1.85 tons/day C4 Clerk \\MIAMI PDC\PROJECT\2409\CIVI\WORD\SITEUTIL.STY.DOC Miramar Center (Phase II and III) Site Utility Study Page 9 �- 0 Z9 MIRAMAR CENTRE PHASE II AND III MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT ECONOMIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Prepared for Florida East Coast Realty By: Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. One S.E. Third Avenue Suite 2100 Miami, Florida 33131 'tlbjfted into the public recti sn connects h wlth --=�_ ori Wa3Ne,r Forman +pity Clerk 01- 19 9 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE THE PROJECT OVERVIEW EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction 2 Summary of Benefits 3 OBJECTIVES AND DEFINITIONS Objectives 6 Definition of Economic and Tax Impact 6 Direct and Indirect Effects 6 Measures of Economic Impact 7 Description of Results g DISCUSSION OF THE RESULTS BY ECONOMIC INDICATORS Impact Indicators g Results of Indicators g Impact of Construction g Impact of Ongoing Operations 10 Impact on Local Tax Revenues 10 Analysis by Economic Indicators 10 Employment 10 Wages 11 Output 11 Local Taxes 12 Impact Fees 13 EXHIBITS 14 Exhibit I: Summary of Economic Impact Exhibit II: Impact and Other Fees Submitted mitted into th re &Z !n c►a,nn a Puh!!c o n- on nth err an Col Cho 01- 199 MIRAMAR CENTER PHASE II & III PROJECT OVERVIEW s "Od Into the c°nn�'n Du bllc an h F °eman 01- 199 F_ jJECT OVERVIEW The proposed project consists of two buildings, a 635 unit high-rise rental apartment building and a 10 story low-rise institutional commercial building located on N.E. 17th Terrace, between N.E. 4th Avenue and North Bayshore Drive, in the city of Miami, Florida (the Project). The development consists of two parcels of land with a net area of 70,330 square feet or 1.62 acres. The gross lot area is 121,473 square feet or 1.62 acres. The gross lot area is 121,473 square feet or 2.8 acres. Phase II is a unique triangular shaped parcel that fronts on both N.E. 17th Terrace and North Bayshore Drive at their intersection. The parcel abuts Phase I of Miramar Center along the hypotenuse. Phase II will contain the residential development and parking garage. Phase III fronts N.E. 4th Avenue along its westerly boundary and N.E. 17th Terrace to the south. The easterly boundary abuts Phase II and phase I across an existing 10 foot wide alleyway. Phase III will contain a 7 story low-rise office building containing institutional space and supporting facilities. These two (2) parcels will stand as individual parcels each with its own improvements totally contained within its own site. Construction of Phase II is expected to commence by June, 2001 and to be completed by Spring of 2003. Construction of Phase III is expected to commence by June, 2003 and to be completed by June, 2004. Submitted into the blic e in co+= r3� Hon with R` 'C("` �- an Jerk Miramar Center Phase II & III — Economic Impact Study Page 1 Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. November 1, 2000 01- 199 MIRAMAR CENTER PHASE II & III EXECUTIVE SUMMARY incanna n with --_ on 4v jerk 01 199 INTRODUCTION This document represents an in-depth economic and tax benefits analysis of the development and operation of a first class rental apartment complex with a restaurant and retail facilities and a final phase with institutional (school of higher learning) and office space. The Project is located on N.E. 17th Terrace, between N.E. 4th Avenue and North Bayshore Drive. Miramar Center Phase II's extraordinary design and high tech appearance and shape will be a major landmark in the City skyline. The building will be a single tower of 56 stories containing 635 apartments rising above a 9 level parking structure with 667 parking spaces. There will be a plaza level with lobby. The building will have a recreational deck with an Olympic type swimming pool, two whirlpool spas, a Bar-B-Que area, and landscaped areas for sunning and relaxation. The recreational deck will also have a fitness center with exercise room, lockers and sanitary facilities, a business center, retail space and multipurpose meeting/party rooms. The business center will not be open to the public. It will contain meeting/conference rooms, office equipment such as computers, printers, fax and copy machine. Secretarial and notary service will be available to users of the center. The Project will also include an 9,500 square foot gourmet, bay view restaurant & cafe that is destined to become one of the City's major dining and entertainment venues. A variety of street level retail and service amenities will be available to both tenants and the public in general. Phase III will have approximately 92,000 square feet of institutional space together with support office space. The building will have 5 levels of space above two levels of parking with 96 parking spaces. The roof level of the building will have recreation and open space facilities including a swimming pool for the students and employees that occupy the building. The two buildings will serve to continue the resurgence of the OmniNenetia commercial, office and residential districts and will contribute to the continuing development of the Downtown Miami residential market. Residents of Miramar Center Phase II and employees/students of Phase III will contribute expenditures to support retailing, restaurants, entertainment, utilization of the PeopleMover System, enliven downtown after normal business hours and, in general, expand the quality of life in Downtown Miami. This analysis encompasses the entire Project and estimates the economic and tax benefits for both its developmental and operational phases. SWrllitted into the Public recOq in connecWn with on W%Ier Foeman City Clerk Miramar Center Phase II & III — Economic Impact Study Page 2 Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. November 1, 2000 199 SUMMARY OF BENEFITS The Project will bring significant economic benefits to the city of Miami (the City). This section summarizes the impact of the Project on employment, public sector revenues and other economic benefits as a result of the development. Employment Employment considerations include the direct employment resulting from the Project. Average developmental construction phase employment will be for approximately 330 employees and the Project management is expected to employ 40 people for on-going maintenance and operations of the facilities. In addition, businesses leasing retail space in the building are estimated to employ 25 people. Wages To compute the wages associated with the new employment we started with budgeted data directly related to the developmental and operational phases of the Project, and we incorporated data from our research on retail sales. Total impact expected from wages associated with the new development approximate the following: One Time $50,362,560 Annual 2,448,878 Tax Revenue The estimate of the public sector revenues associated with the development includes taxes and other revenues generated directly by the Project. Although public sector costs are important elements in measuring fiscal impact, these benefits have not been quantified in this document. This analysis only measures the benefits derived from the development. Annual tax revenue expected to be created totals $3,310,034. Output The estimate of total economic impact is measured by total output. This analysis measures the economic impact of developmental costs and ongoing, operational expenditures. To determine the effect of respending within the City, we utilized a multiplier to compute total direct and indirect benefits. Total output expected to be generated, as a result of the developmental operational phases of the Project will approximate the following: One Time $167,478,783 Annual $ 8,036,245 SubMitted into record In connoGn2the public c`tlan with �.2 VyaherF_ e eman Clerk Miramar Center Phase II & III — Economic Impact Study Page 3 Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. November 1, 2000 91- 199 SUMMARY OF BENEFITS Significant Community Benefits: • Jobs • Wages Taxes • Economic Activity Condominium Residents' and Retail Business Employees' spending impacting Local Businesses: o Food ❑ Recreation/Entertainment ❑ Transportation ❑ Retail S ubMitted into the public record in connec- ion with 4n ?2z2_ w422AIsll. Walter Foernan City Clerk Miramar Center Phase II & 111— Economic Impact Study Page 4 Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. NovemberA, 000 SUMMARY OF BENEFITS The following table summarizes the economic impact of the Miramar Center Phase 11 & III development: Economic Activity Stimulated Output Wages Taxes Jobs Created CONSTRUCTION PERIOD ANNUAL IMPACT RECURRING $167,478,783 $ 8,036,245 50,362,560 2,448,878 3,310,024 $217,841,343 $13,795,147 330 65 Subntteci x7xo the Pubfic rem con'leCli n with on V Wr Ferman Clpy Cleric Miramar Center Phase 11 & III — Economic Impact Study Page 5 Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. November 1, 2000 04- 199 Miramar Center Phace 11 & III OBJECTIVES AND DEFINITIONS Subf tltted into the publlC reco4 in connecffgn with ite�t on z� WaWr Foenan City Clerk 01- 199 OBJECTIVES AND DEFINITIONS Objectives The objective of this analysis is to provide information on the various benefits created by the Project and to prepare an estimate of such benefits to the City. Our analysis is based on an economic model, which estimates economic and tax impacts of various projects on a designated area. The model is specifically tailored to the City. Definition of Economic and Tax Impact The construction and subsequent operation of the Project will create important benefits within the City. These benefits include new income, new jobs, new tax revenue and new economic activity impacting upon every sector of the local economy. Moreover, through the multiplier effect of respending and reinvesting, indirect economic benefits are added to the direct benefits brought about by initial construction expenditures, the expenditures from ongoing operations and new spending at the retail enterprises. Direct and Indirect Effects The total economic impact of public and private projects and policies on a region does not end with the impact from the initial construction expenditures; the continued benefits to the local economy must also be considered. Income to firms furnishing construction materials and services is subsequently converted into employee salaries, material purchases, investment in plant and equipment, savings, profits, purchases of services, and a variety of other economic activities. Income to laborers is subsequently respent for purchasing of food, housing, transportation, entertainment, education, medical and dental services, clothing, personal services, and a wide variety of other goods and services. Furthermore, income to governmental unit is respent as salaries, purchases, and support of a variety of programs, including education, transportation, and social services. In turn, individuals, firms, and governments furnishing these goods and services again spend their income for more purchases, salaries, investments, and savings. In this manner, indirect benefits result each time the initial sum is respent, and the additional sum available in the local economy induces further job creation, business development and savings. Quantification of these indirect benefits has been the object of considerate economic study. Because economic relationships are so complex in our mod&h 3 445) society, no single area or political unit is a completely self-contained economic urt.�� Therefore, purchases from other areas and political units are necessary, and goods ` U services are exported in return. As purchases are made from other units, some of the benefits of econorrnco respending are lost to the local economy. Ultimately, a smaller and smaller port rv= of the initial sum would remain, until, after several rounds of respending,r�,�v insignificant sum is left. Miramar Center Phase II & III — Economic Impact Study Page Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. Novernhar 11-000 19 9 5 ti OBJECTIVES AND DEFINITIONS The indirect effects can be viewed as a set of "ripples" in the economy. Indirect, like direct, resources require labor, materials, equipment and services for their production to induce further job creation and spending of wages. The ripple" of the indirect effect multiplies the original impact of the purchase. The common measure of the magnitude of the "ripple" effect is called a multiplier. A multiplier measures the total magnitude of the impact on each particular economic indicator as a multiple of the initial, direct effect. For instance, a multiplier of "1" would signify no "ripple" effects as the total impact is 1 times the initial impact, while a multiplier of "2" would imply that the total impact is 2 times the direct effect. The actual magnitude of a multiplier depends on the likelihood the goods and services purchased in a region would be produced in, or provided from the region. The model we used to estimate the total economic impact incorporates a multiplier developed by utilizing past consumption and production patterns in the City. There will be significant economic benefit derived from the expenditures of the residents of the Project on eating, drinking, grocery, recreation, retail etc. This report does not include the economic impact of such expenditures. Measures of Economic Impact Various measures can be used to indicate the impact of a policy or project on a region. Specifically, for this study, they are the increases in local employment, wages, tax revenue and output that result. Definitions of these measures are as follows: ❑ Employment is measured in full -time -equivalent jobs. ❑ Wages include wages, salaries, and proprietor's income only. They may include non -wage compensation, such as pensions, insurance, and other fringe benefits. Wages are assumed to be expended by households in the area at which the wage-earner works. ❑ Local taxes include additional revenues from both ad valorem and non ad valorem assessments. ca ❑ Direct Expenditures include those sums expended for land acquisition, site'� CU preparation and all hard and soft costs associated with a project. g e � 8 U LL ❑ Indirect Expenditures are those sums expended within the local economy as a U result of the "ripple" effect described earlier. ❑ Output describes total economic activity, and is essentially equivalent to the sum of direct and indirect expenditures (exclusive of wages and taxes). ti c Miramar Center Phase II & Ill — Economic Impact Study Page 7 Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. 01 Noveitq b 2000 OBJECTIVES AND DEFINITIONS Description of Results For the purpose of describing the total economic benefits of the Project, the related expenditures and economic activity stimulated have been broken into two categories: 1) Developmental 2) Annual Recurring Developmental expenditures include those expenditures related to the design and construction phase of the Project and related amenities. Annual recurring activities stimulated are those expenditures incurred in connection with the ongoing operation of the Project, and the sales and expenditures of the retail enterprises leasing space at the Project. �;Ubfry fso. i rec°rc in to 'he Pubfle �Conne . With *after �pe� C6tY Clerk Miramar Center Phase II & III — Economic Impact Study Page g Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. 01— 1PQ%Qnber 1, 2000 Miramar Center Phace II & III DISCUSSION OF THE RESULTS BY ECONOMIC INDICATORS ��atzrtied into the puQiic recon in connection with on Wr Foeman City Clerk di-- 199 DISCUSSION OF THE RESULTS BY ECONOMIC INDICATORS Impact Indicators We measured the Project's impact on four commonly used indicators of economic activity. Those indicators are: ❑ Jobs ❑ Wages ❑ Total output ❑ Local taxes Results of Indicators Exhibit I details the Project's direct and indirect impact on the above economic indicators for Miami. A summary of such impact follows: DEVELOPMENT (ONE TIME) OUTPUT WAGES TAKES EMPLOYMENT Direct $ 89,122,383 $ 26,800,000 330 Indirect 78,356,400 23,562,560 Total $ 167,478,783 $ 50,362,560 330 OPERATIONAL (ANNUAL): Direct $ 2,956,418 $ 801,549 $3,310,024 40 Indirect 2,599,283 704,722 Retail 2,480,544 942,607 25 Total $ 8,036,245 $ 2,448,878 $3,310,024 65 The economic indicator most commonly measured, and publicly reported on to gauge the economic impact of a public project is output. The impact of a project on the indicator output is often referred to as the project's economic impact. Impact of Construction: The site preparation and construction expenditures, including soft costs and impact fees are estimated at $92.3 million. Such activity will create approximately 330 new full time equivalent jobs and employ a maximum of 460 workers during peak periods. The workers will earn approximately $26.8 million in wages. These jobs will primarily be in construction, transportation and related service industries. Spending for site preparation and project construction will result in a total estimated impact of $174.5 million dollars, excluding financing costs. Submitted 6to She public MCI Lincionnecbon with itean W marl City Cleric Miramar Center Phase II & III — Economic Impact Study Page 9 Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. 01 1 C"ember 1, 2000 DISCUSSION OF THE RESULTS BY ECONOMIC INDICATORS Impact of Ongoing Operations and Retail Enterprises: As a result of the on-going operation and maintenance of the Project, Miami will gain approximately 40 new, permanent, fill -time equivalent jobs. The wages of the workers who obtain these positions will provide an impact of approximately $1.5 million annually. The retail enterprises are estimated to create 25 permanent, full-time equivalent jobs. The wages of the workers employed by the retailers will provide an impact of approximately $.9 million annually. The total expenditures for the Project's operations, and the retail sales will provide a new, permanent impact of $10.4 million annually to the City's economy. This impact consists of the effects of new retail sales and the direct expenditures from the maintenance, security and day-to-day operation of the Project, and the multiplied effects of such spending thus creating indirect benefits. Impact on Local Tax Revenues: As a result of the construction and operation of the Project, various state, city and city governments and agencies would gain an estimated annual tax benefit of $3.3 million. Analysis by Economic Indicators: Our analysis of the economic and tax benefits of the Project was done by each major phase of the Project. We identified the major phases to be developmental and operational. This analysis determines the economic benefits to the City by identifying such benefits for each of the phases. The effects on economic indicators used to measure benefits (employment, wages, output and taxes) were computed for each phase. Employment Employment is one of the most important economic benefits of the Project. It is one of the most accessible and direct benefits for the City's residents and it's residents and is a primary means by which developmental, operational and maintenance expenditures generate indirect economic benefits. A portion of this employment occurs on-site as a result of new spending at the retail enterprises, and a portion is derived from on-going operations of the Project. Further employment is generated off-site by the expenditures of employees of the Project and businesses located in the Project, at area businesses. As can be seen in Exhibit I, total short-term (developmental) employment will average 330 employees over a thirty-six month period and a total on-going employment will average 65. The total on-going positions can be summarized as follows: ❑ Management ❑ Security Seffe`d Into the Public ❑ Parking recordd,i�n'C011nec on with ❑ Maintenance/Facilities m -O -�_ on ❑ Retail Wailer Foeman City Clerk Miramar Center Phase II & III — Economic Impact Stu61— 9 November 10 Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. ber 1, 2000 DISCUSSION OF THE RESULTS BY ECONOMIC INDICATORS Wages The analysis deemed wages are a direct by-product of employment. As discussed in the above section, both on-site and off-site jobs are created. There were both temporary and permanent in nature. To compute the wages associated with the new employment we started with budgeted data directly related to the developmental and operational phases of the Project, and we incorporated data from our research on retail sales. Employment, such as construction related employment, was obtained directly from construction estimates. These numbers were tested for reasonableness. Output The output generated, as a result of the development and operations of the Project, is caused by the following type of expenditures: ❑ Development costs expended in the City (100%) ❑ Annual operational expenditures of management company ❑ New spending in the locality by employees of businesses and offices located in the Project Exhibit II shows a summary of the development costs expended in Miami, the operational expenditures made in relation to the on-going maintenance of the Project and the estimated sales of the retail enterprises. To incorporate the impact of dollars being respent and/or reinvested in the City, a multiplier was applied to total direct output. A multiplier of 1.8792 was used to determine total direct and indirect output created by the Project. This multiplier indicates that for every $100 spent in Miami, another $187.92 will be respent or reinvested in Miami. This multiplier was obtained from the Dade City Planning Department. Direct output from the developmental phase of the Project is primarily a result of developer costs. These costs include land acquisition, site preparation and soft and hard costs relating to the Project's construction. To determine the total output we determined what development costs were expected to be or had been spent in Miami. Submitted into We public re in connection with 4aj�&/ Waiter Foeman City Clerk Miramar Center Phase Il & 111- Economic Impact Study 0 19 9 Page 11 Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. November 1, 2000 DISCUSSION OF THE RESULTS BY ECONOMIC INDICATORS Total direct output during the development phase is $89.1 million. Total indirect output created by the direct respending in Miami is $78.4 million. Thus total Miami Output from the development of the Project is $167.5 million. The final component of output results from the direct operating expenditures of the Project, and the indirect benefits created as a result of the multiplier effect on direct output. The Developer provided us with an annual operating budget for the Project. An overall assumption was made that all expenditures would be spent initially in the City. The total operating expenditures incorporate all estimated expenses of the ongoing operation of the Project. The impact of the retail enterprises was measured separately as an economic indicator. To incorporate the potential respending and reinvesting in Miami, the multiplier effect was measured. By applying a multiplier of 1.8792 to the total direct output from operating expenditures and the retail enterprises, we determined total output (direct and indirect) from on-going operating expenditures and retail sales. Total direct output created from retail sales and operating expenditures is $4.3 million. Total indirect output created from retail sales and operating expenditures is $3.7 million. Total output created from ongoing operations and retail enterprises is approximately $8.0 million. Local Taxes A key and significant benefit generated from the development and operation of the Project is taxes. Several types of tax revenue will be generated from this project including ad valorem taxes. Specific ad valorem taxes include real and personal property taxes. Other taxes include occupational taxes and community development taxes. New real property taxes will be assessed on the Project. The assessment is based on a predetermined millage rate being applied to the taxable value of the real property. We computed real property taxes for the developmental phase based on the cost of the development of the Project. This assessment base is very conservative since tax on real property typically is assessed on appraised values and not actual cost. The basis for ongoing taxes is also overall cost. The millage rate was obtained from the City Tax Collectors office relative to the Project's location. The projected annual real property taxes are approximately $3.3 million. Sut'M61:4,ed into the public recOrd 41 connection with ite r J2- ,_ on Wader Foreman Miramar Center Phase 118 III — Economic Impact Study "'Yd9�"F2 Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. November 1, 2000 DISCUSSION OF THE RESULTS BY ECONOMIC INDICATORS Total ad valorem taxes assessed by Miami -Dade City are allocated based on millage rates to certain governmental entities. Listed below is the allocation of projected tax revenue. AD VALOREM TAX ANNUAL REVENUE City Operating $ 1,094,470 City Miscellaneous 57,604 School Operating 997,005 County Operating 669,240 Debt Service - City 161,290 Debt Service - County 94,009 South Florida Water 68,779 Library Operating 36,982 School Debt Service 114,055 Florida Inland Navigation 5,069 Environmental Projects 11,521 TOTAL 11110,024 Although not quantified, the City, through its receipt of allocated state sales taxes will receive an additional benefit as a result of the development and operation of the Project, and from the retail enterprises. Public Sector Costs Impact Fees Very significant factors in measuring the economic impact on a specific region of a project are impact and other required development fees. A summary of these fees are listed below: ❑ City of Miami Developmental Impact Fee ❑ City of Miami Developmental Admin Fee ❑ Downtown Development Supplemental Fee Submitted into !'he public ❑ Miami -Dade County School Impact Fee risco Linconnecti n with ❑ Miami -Dade W.A.S.A. Connection Fees or>�-, ❑ Building Permit Fee Waiter Foeman ❑ Other Fees City Clerk For the purpose of this economic impact analysis, fees are included as a part of the direct development cost (output). Impact fees total approximately $1.6 million and other fees total approximately $1.3 million. These fees are shown in detail in Exhibit II. Miramar Center Phace 11 & III — Economic Impact Study 01-- 199 Page 13 Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. November 1, 2000 Exhibit I Summary of Economic Impact Exhibit II Impact and Other Fees EXHIBIT LIST Sub tied into the public record in connecclon with on, r!tv Clerk 01- 199 Miramar Center Phase If & III — Economic Impact Study Page 14 Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. November 1, 2000 MIRAMAR CENTER PHASE II & III ECONOMIC BENEFITS STUDY SUMMARY OF ECONOMIC IMPACT DIRECT DEVELOPMENTAL OPERATIONAL RETAIL TOTAL DIRECT INDIRECT DEVELOPMENTAL OPERATIONAL RETAIL TOTAL INDIRECT If TOTAL BENEFITS 13 TOTAL DEVELOPMENTAL 0 0 TOTAL OPERATIONAL TOTAL RETAIL iL TOTAL BENEFITS t n EXHIBIT I OUTPUT WAGES EMPLOYMENT TAXES $ 89,122,383 $ 26,800,000 330 2,956,418 801,549 40 $ 3,310,024 1,320,000 501,600 25 93,398,801 28,103,149 395 3,310,024 78,356,400 2,599,283 1,160, 544 82,116,227 $ 175,515,028 $ 167,478,783 5,555,701 2,480,544 $ 175,515,028 23,562,560 704,722 441,007 24,708,289 $ 52,811,438 $ 50,362,560 1,506,271 942,607 $ 52,811,438 395 330 all 25 395 $ 3,310,024 $ 3,310,024 $ 3,310,024 MIRAMAR CENTER PHASE II & III EXHIBIT Il ECONOMIC BENEFITS STUDY IMPACT AND OTHER FEES IMPACT AND OTHER FEES: A. Development Square Footages: Square Footage 1) Total gross building area (with parking) 1,174, 338 2) Maximum development area (FAR) 671,335 3) Residential F.A.R. 560,963 4) Non Residential F.A.R. 18,112 5) Gross parking area 371,820 B. Impact Fees: Amount 1) City of Miami Development Impact Fee (Ord -10426) $ 404,532 2) Development Impact Administration Fee (Ord -10426) 12,136 3) Downtown Development Supplemental Fee (Ord. 10461) 254,701 4) Miami -Dade County School Impact Fee 902,360 Total of all Impact Fees $ 1,573,729 C. Non -Impact Fees: 1) Miami Dade W.A.S.A. "connection fees" $ 954,037 2) Building Permit Fee 208,631 3) Installation Energy Fee 104,316 4) Major Use Special Permit Application Fee 30,000 5) Miami -Dade County Code Compliance 38,115 6) Radon Gas Fee 5,216 7) Fire Plan Review Fee 9,910 8) Ground Cover Fee 560 9) Land Use/Zoning 703 10) Zoning Review for Building Permit Fee 60 11) Certificate of Occupancy Fee 250 12) Application Fee 35 Total of all Non -Impact Fees $ 1,351,833 Total of all Fees for Project $ 2,925,562 Source: City of Miami Planning, Building and Zoning Department. Miami Dade County Impact Fees Su'ewtt0d + ire 'n �t� ttr Public1Cn rsrrtti Z21 ;ter F°ei City Cle k oi- f99 w MIRAMAR CENTRE PHASE II AND III MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT SURVEY OF PROPERTY Prepared for Florida East Coast Realty By: Fortin, Leavy, Skiles, Inc. 180 NE 168th Street Sub"*te 4 'ntO thO public North Miami Beach, Florida 331 bIn connection with "Mm�-e00. City cielk 01- 199 J Q 1/FOUND 1/2" PIP & CAP L.B. 3653 8/11/00) 94 a _ — — — — — — . _ . — — . — INR - - - - - - 0 T H GRAPHIC SCALE ' L p T 2 I =MEN IN FEET ) I Ise 1 inch = 30 it. L 0 7,— - L 0 T J '• 3 10 VQ arAll I.sT• a *` s7128 B L T 4 I LO E _ �. .e.w awN :.W w:r • I ' �./ .9 s SET NAIL & DISK 1„` A L.B. 3653 (8/11/00) d C 0 \ ` \ / , MONUMENT LINE 5.00r _ 4 9 MOMg1UlT'% `._. J 6 = 26'39'05' LK/ R = 420.00' TaFrIaIIL ter_ �,t \ .. ,., F e •� T - 99.48' 37' ` r MMr LCI rou A 26-U'41 r O R = 548.00 yl T 128. � oTQ L=251.8181 ' SET NAIL & DISK 0� LB3653 (8/11/00) 'o 0 T ee \Q P k b� I 40`0 V oyr RADIAL N BO02 a� NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 5 JLM—STORY BUILDING / 1756 NORTH BAY ROAD / Y ---------------- � a is qtr, L 0 T 2 \ N.E. 17th TERRACE --- ��/ CMONUMENT /� UNE { I 7 0, L FM w { { LOCATION SKETCH SCALE: 1" = 300' L E G E N D - CENTERLINE MONUMENT CME OVERHEAD ELECTRIC WIRES - WATER VALVE ELEVATION z - ELEVATION - 0.5' CURB - �i I P` - SIGN --"---- - o) J m�� N Ur�TTn n no �11 I W - LAND SURVEYOR LB. u I\ -- _ CONCRETE . ASPIWT PAVEMENT LJLLJ LILLJan LLLIJ L� N. E. 18th STREET .' rn �nTn nTn r--1"r� SITE G G� � vJ �C—rj titI_ rd �z =r-1Tn MTnm LIILJ Li iii N. E. 17th TERRACE f I-FT i-1 T rl'l rF17 T F1 LIJ L LJ J_ LJJ III r � s LOCATION SKETCH SCALE: 1" = 300' L E G E N D LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 6, 7, 10 & 11, Block 8 of MIRAMAR according to the Plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 5, Page 4 of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County. Florida. SURVEYOR'S NOTES. - This site lies in Section 31, Township 53 South, Range 42 East, City of Miami, Miami Dade County. Florida. - Bearings hereon are referred to an assumed value of N 51'05'40 W for the Northerly right of way line of N.E. 17th Terrace. and evidenced by a set nail & disk LB 3653 and and a found 1/2" pipe and cap. - Lands shown hereon were not abstracted for easements and/or rights-of-way of records. - Elevations shown hereon ore relative to the National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929, based on City of Miami Bench Marks. - Lands shown hereonore located in Federal Flood Zone AE (EI. 10) per Community Panel No. 120650 0183 J. Dated March 02, 1994 and index map revised July 15, 1995. - Lands shown hereon containing 28,619 square feet, or 0.6570 acres more or less. - Underground improvements and/or underground encroachments not shown unless otherwise indicated. - Dimens ons indicated hereon are field measured unless otherwise noted. - Roof overhang not located unless otherwise shown. - The approximate location of all utilities shown hereon were determined from As -Built plans and/or on-site locations and should be verified before construction. Legal description shown hereon furnished by client. SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that this "Boundary Survey" was made under my responsible charge on December 19, 1994, and lost updated on August 11. 2000 and meets the Minimum Technical Standards as set forth by the Florida Board of Professional Land Surveyors in Chapter 6IC17-6, Florida Administrative Code, pursuant to Section 472.027, Florida Statutes. .E� "Not valid without the signature and the original ai �ySalbnW too IntO the pytjliC seal of a Florida Licensed Surveyor and Mapper" r *C0Ed in con i l eetiUr► with FORTIN. LEAVY, SKILES, INC. L.B. 3653 ftm f2z,-L `goon_2ge'Tt� L - • ! Foe, rd a 1 Daniel iC.o Fortin, For The Firm ® 1 r 1 ^ 9 City !"vl�e,�� Professional tiLand Surveyor Firm 2853 \ t Clerk State of Florida ate 12-19-1994 Seale I. = 30' Drawn By. DANJR Job. No. 951737 Ref. Dwg. 951479/294D-38 Field Bk oo. 477 41 RLL Ced, M. 951737 Dwg. No, 295D-319 Sheet Lz;t er t - CENTERLINE MONUMENT CME OVERHEAD ELECTRIC WIRES - WATER VALVE ELEVATION EL - ELEVATION - 0.5' CURB = 1.00' CURB & CUTTER - SIGN --"---- CHNIN LINK FENCE L.S. - LAND SURVEYOR LB. - LAND BOARD _ PAIR TREE _ CONCRETE . ASPIWT PAVEMENT LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 6, 7, 10 & 11, Block 8 of MIRAMAR according to the Plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 5, Page 4 of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County. Florida. SURVEYOR'S NOTES. - This site lies in Section 31, Township 53 South, Range 42 East, City of Miami, Miami Dade County. Florida. - Bearings hereon are referred to an assumed value of N 51'05'40 W for the Northerly right of way line of N.E. 17th Terrace. and evidenced by a set nail & disk LB 3653 and and a found 1/2" pipe and cap. - Lands shown hereon were not abstracted for easements and/or rights-of-way of records. - Elevations shown hereon ore relative to the National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929, based on City of Miami Bench Marks. - Lands shown hereonore located in Federal Flood Zone AE (EI. 10) per Community Panel No. 120650 0183 J. Dated March 02, 1994 and index map revised July 15, 1995. - Lands shown hereon containing 28,619 square feet, or 0.6570 acres more or less. - Underground improvements and/or underground encroachments not shown unless otherwise indicated. - Dimens ons indicated hereon are field measured unless otherwise noted. - Roof overhang not located unless otherwise shown. - The approximate location of all utilities shown hereon were determined from As -Built plans and/or on-site locations and should be verified before construction. Legal description shown hereon furnished by client. SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that this "Boundary Survey" was made under my responsible charge on December 19, 1994, and lost updated on August 11. 2000 and meets the Minimum Technical Standards as set forth by the Florida Board of Professional Land Surveyors in Chapter 6IC17-6, Florida Administrative Code, pursuant to Section 472.027, Florida Statutes. .E� "Not valid without the signature and the original ai �ySalbnW too IntO the pytjliC seal of a Florida Licensed Surveyor and Mapper" r *C0Ed in con i l eetiUr► with FORTIN. LEAVY, SKILES, INC. L.B. 3653 ftm f2z,-L `goon_2ge'Tt� L - • ! Foe, rd a 1 Daniel iC.o Fortin, For The Firm ® 1 r 1 ^ 9 City !"vl�e,�� Professional tiLand Surveyor Firm 2853 \ t Clerk State of Florida ate 12-19-1994 Seale I. = 30' Drawn By. DANJR Job. No. 951737 Ref. Dwg. 951479/294D-38 Field Bk oo. 477 41 RLL Ced, M. 951737 Dwg. No, 295D-319 Sheet Lz;t er t N 9000'00" E— 287.31_ 2TY MIAJUMENT LRJE 5000000" E N 9000'00 E ].77' N.E. 18ttA STREET > -------------------- cc r MIRAMAR i I 4II X L o T z 1 block 8 / PLAT BOOK 5, PAGE 4 �yL o l LOT r — I eR^ z l '2 .4t) L o t I I \ L O or,e�p`� . \ \ za ' M•A••e;'W J (RADIA( -203' a o°�wn ' ieroi Pusix— / a 7\ � w.•wwWxK .im.•.wr.a,RA"''"'�"�"•`� �7j�' �: W I� ,� I wv.x r- MI"AR t "° •,.,a4 /" t writ- r: / block '8\Div PLAT BOOK 5, PA E 4 r '3` t MULTI -STORY BUILDING,' I /1756 N BAYSHORE DRIVE j- /------- • O '� -- , ELEVATIIXI. + 5.80' (Plast LEVEL) rr ' L LL T r ELEVAI. 11785' (SECOND LEVEL) s I NATIONAL GEODETIC VERDCAL DATUM OF 192910 ��+ Y. 1 \ « \ \ " , ,O,r, - �' 0555'22', N 58. Z \ R = 558.00' ears SWCORNER OF '�eeeExiQ' LOT 1, BLOCK 1 rAMe Rfp4 ar' PMNwo IERII \ \ C (P.B. 149. PG. 79) ilars— �?� FOUND 1/2" PIPE & CAP L83653 (8/11/00) �aiArt n ;' FOUND 1/2- PIPE & CAP A �a.,M• L83653 (8/11/00) <\((wv FOU ./2094 3' OFFSE 1/0� PARK r XMINW�E11 \ \eve • T v ti s,. os. TO• bs� O • \\ea a ABBREVIATIONS: \ P.B. - PLAT BOOK BLDG.. BUILDING PC. - PACE W/ WITH CONC. CONCRETE F.P.L. FLORIDA POWER & LICHT SO. BELL TEL. SOUTHERN BELL TELEPHONE UNOG. ELECT. = UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC N./5./E./W. = NORTH/SOUTH/EAST/WEST PRM - PERMANENT REFERENCE MONUMENT C N i x 24' CONCRETE BLOCK REINFORCED WTH STEEL REBARS WITH A BRASS DISK STAMPED LS2094 ti vo Q �`, UMT v eua•ia Hole .. I_t l H_ r i$ `.`. ,' 90'0000" 266.84 N 7426'39" w (RADIAL 1 7760') ` ♦ SE CORNER OF LOT I; -BLOCK 1 (P.B. 149, PG. 79) Y Z / Q. Q wivaR ,x ` FOUND NAIL 8 DASK LB3653 (8/11/00) R = 1277.60' y 01 23'01' nxnac l T .rL afo ♦ L L 30.85' VAn ♦� o,y�<`( F. SET 1 2" PIPE &�9P O v `` LB 53 (6/11/00) ». V A C A N T FAO 0 1/2- PIPE & CAP LB30`(8/11/00, LOT 2 ♦ r�00yo�roqq „Qe.. ♦ o,,e . / ,� / P A R K ♦ pv - ,�., a e. t s saw Vass rt -,_ leg \\ farjo � pArt Rei 33 EA5'tEia.Y �M?.MN,WENITS I� I I I _ 17371Yr �ebe' — OUND 1/2 PIPE qtr CAP LB36 (8/11/00') PP N O FOUND NAIL & DISK PRM R L.B. /3653 MIRAMAR T FOUND P.R.M.,y2094 PLAZA H 3' OFFSET (8/11/00) PER P.B. 33, PG 18 P.C.P. GRAPHIC SCALE ( IN FEET ) 1 inch - 30 It N_& 20th STREET C — — — — N.W. ORNER N SEG 31-TWP. 53S.-4 NG. 42E. iF 0 a C� ; R3 W x z 0 w �rI d v N. E. 18th STREET 5 �I � DO i =� = m 2i SITE — N�..E.-17th TERRACE LOCATION SKETCH SCALE: 1" = 300' PORTION OF N.W. 1/4 SEC. 31 - T. 53S. - R. 42 E. LEGAL DESCR FrM: LOT 2. BLOCK 1, OF SEAPORT, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 149, PAGE 79, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY. FLORIDA. Sl1RVEY'OFMS NDTIES: - This site Iles in Section 31, Township 53 South, Ronge 42 East. City of Miami. Miami -Dude County, Florida. - All documents are recorded in the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florido unless otherwise noted. - Bearings hereon are referred to an assumed Value of N5105'40"W for the Northerly right-of-way line of N.E. 17th Terrace. said bearing is identical with the plat of record, and evidenced by found two (2) Permonent Reference Monuments /2094 at a 3' offsets. Elewtions shown hereon are reat:ve to the National Geodetic vertical datum of 1929, based on City of Miami bench marks. - Lands shown hereon were not abstracted for easements and/or rights-of-way of records. - Lands shown hereon are located In Federal Flood Zone 'AE" (EL.10), "AE" (EL11) Der Community Panel No 120650 0183 J, dated March 02, 1994 and index map revised July 17, 1995 - Dimensions indicated hereon are field measured using a total stolon electronic distance measurement (EDM), unless otherwise noted. - Lands shown hereon containing 41,774 square feet. or 0.959 acres, more or less. - Precision of closure 1:10,000 - Commercial Class Survey. - Root overhang not located unless otherwise shown. - Lot 1,Block 1, Seaport P.B. 149, Pg. 79 improvements were located on July 14, 2000 and were not updated on this survey. Underground improvements and/or underground encroachments not shown unless otherwise indicated - The underground utilities shown have been located from field survey information and existing drawings The surveyor makes no guarantee that the underground utilities shown comprise all such utilities 'n the area, either in service or abandoned The surveyor further does not warrant that the underground utilities shown are in the exact location indicated although he does certify that they are located as accurotely as possible from the information available. The surveyor has not physically located the underground utilities. AJpyEYOfMB CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that this 'Boundary Survey was made under my responsible charge on August 11, 2000, and meets the Minimum Technical Standards as set forth by the Florida Board of Professional Surveyors and Moppers in Chapter 611317-6, Florida Administrotive Code, pursuant to Section 472.027, Florido Statutes. 'Nal va60 WrCdria dpWa olid Bla pItlINL falead seel da Fb*k lJofssW&NVWJv end Yfpllef �s a p� A the !t}� FORTIN LEAVY, SMES, INC, IBS SubMi"-d into the public By. - ------------- reams in ccnnc :flan with Daniel C. Fort For the F rm ya_ — state and MC Florida., I LS2853 eRaV�w s 7d /1f1 Wafter Foeman V � r VI1GIArk .. Lw.y, 4fw. Inc W S ana e ie Val e loe Rw.eeucee 'n 'M,W u� E.wm eiIlnirwiElN Pam 0- of Som.. ate 8/11/00 Scale 1"=30' Drees By. DCFJR Cod, No. 001055 Plotted: 8/18/00 5 44 Ref- Dwg. 2970-024-2 Field Book. FLO SHEET Job. No. 20001055 Dwg. No. 2970-024-3 sheet of 1 INLET CATCH BASIN ® = MANHOLE LIGHT POLE = PARKING METER y . FIRE HYDRANT Y WATER METER - CENTERLINE MONUMENT LINE . WATER VALVE ea = ELEVATION EL - ELEVATION = 0.5' CURB - 2.00' CURB & GUTTER - SIGN —x—= CHAIN LINK FENCE — T — = TELEPHONE UTILITY LINE — - GAS UTILITY LINE —. w— . WATER MAIN OVERHEAD ELECTRIC WIRES -E — - UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC WIRES = PALM TREE = CONCRETE fO- ASPHALT PAVEMENT \ \eve • T v ti s,. os. TO• bs� O • \\ea a ABBREVIATIONS: \ P.B. - PLAT BOOK BLDG.. BUILDING PC. - PACE W/ WITH CONC. CONCRETE F.P.L. FLORIDA POWER & LICHT SO. BELL TEL. SOUTHERN BELL TELEPHONE UNOG. ELECT. = UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC N./5./E./W. = NORTH/SOUTH/EAST/WEST PRM - PERMANENT REFERENCE MONUMENT C N i x 24' CONCRETE BLOCK REINFORCED WTH STEEL REBARS WITH A BRASS DISK STAMPED LS2094 ti vo Q �`, UMT v eua•ia Hole .. I_t l H_ r i$ `.`. ,' 90'0000" 266.84 N 7426'39" w (RADIAL 1 7760') ` ♦ SE CORNER OF LOT I; -BLOCK 1 (P.B. 149, PG. 79) Y Z / Q. Q wivaR ,x ` FOUND NAIL 8 DASK LB3653 (8/11/00) R = 1277.60' y 01 23'01' nxnac l T .rL afo ♦ L L 30.85' VAn ♦� o,y�<`( F. SET 1 2" PIPE &�9P O v `` LB 53 (6/11/00) ». V A C A N T FAO 0 1/2- PIPE & CAP LB30`(8/11/00, LOT 2 ♦ r�00yo�roqq „Qe.. ♦ o,,e . / ,� / P A R K ♦ pv - ,�., a e. t s saw Vass rt -,_ leg \\ farjo � pArt Rei 33 EA5'tEia.Y �M?.MN,WENITS I� I I I _ 17371Yr �ebe' — OUND 1/2 PIPE qtr CAP LB36 (8/11/00') PP N O FOUND NAIL & DISK PRM R L.B. /3653 MIRAMAR T FOUND P.R.M.,y2094 PLAZA H 3' OFFSET (8/11/00) PER P.B. 33, PG 18 P.C.P. GRAPHIC SCALE ( IN FEET ) 1 inch - 30 It N_& 20th STREET C — — — — N.W. ORNER N SEG 31-TWP. 53S.-4 NG. 42E. iF 0 a C� ; R3 W x z 0 w �rI d v N. E. 18th STREET 5 �I � DO i =� = m 2i SITE — N�..E.-17th TERRACE LOCATION SKETCH SCALE: 1" = 300' PORTION OF N.W. 1/4 SEC. 31 - T. 53S. - R. 42 E. LEGAL DESCR FrM: LOT 2. BLOCK 1, OF SEAPORT, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 149, PAGE 79, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY. FLORIDA. Sl1RVEY'OFMS NDTIES: - This site Iles in Section 31, Township 53 South, Ronge 42 East. City of Miami. Miami -Dude County, Florida. - All documents are recorded in the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florido unless otherwise noted. - Bearings hereon are referred to an assumed Value of N5105'40"W for the Northerly right-of-way line of N.E. 17th Terrace. said bearing is identical with the plat of record, and evidenced by found two (2) Permonent Reference Monuments /2094 at a 3' offsets. Elewtions shown hereon are reat:ve to the National Geodetic vertical datum of 1929, based on City of Miami bench marks. - Lands shown hereon were not abstracted for easements and/or rights-of-way of records. - Lands shown hereon are located In Federal Flood Zone 'AE" (EL.10), "AE" (EL11) Der Community Panel No 120650 0183 J, dated March 02, 1994 and index map revised July 17, 1995 - Dimensions indicated hereon are field measured using a total stolon electronic distance measurement (EDM), unless otherwise noted. - Lands shown hereon containing 41,774 square feet. or 0.959 acres, more or less. - Precision of closure 1:10,000 - Commercial Class Survey. - Root overhang not located unless otherwise shown. - Lot 1,Block 1, Seaport P.B. 149, Pg. 79 improvements were located on July 14, 2000 and were not updated on this survey. Underground improvements and/or underground encroachments not shown unless otherwise indicated - The underground utilities shown have been located from field survey information and existing drawings The surveyor makes no guarantee that the underground utilities shown comprise all such utilities 'n the area, either in service or abandoned The surveyor further does not warrant that the underground utilities shown are in the exact location indicated although he does certify that they are located as accurotely as possible from the information available. The surveyor has not physically located the underground utilities. AJpyEYOfMB CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that this 'Boundary Survey was made under my responsible charge on August 11, 2000, and meets the Minimum Technical Standards as set forth by the Florida Board of Professional Surveyors and Moppers in Chapter 611317-6, Florida Administrotive Code, pursuant to Section 472.027, Florido Statutes. 'Nal va60 WrCdria dpWa olid Bla pItlINL falead seel da Fb*k lJofssW&NVWJv end Yfpllef �s a p� A the !t}� FORTIN LEAVY, SMES, INC, IBS SubMi"-d into the public By. - ------------- reams in ccnnc :flan with Daniel C. Fort For the F rm ya_ — state and MC Florida., I LS2853 eRaV�w s 7d /1f1 Wafter Foeman V � r VI1GIArk .. Lw.y, 4fw. Inc W S ana e ie Val e loe Rw.eeucee 'n 'M,W u� E.wm eiIlnirwiElN Pam 0- of Som.. ate 8/11/00 Scale 1"=30' Drees By. DCFJR Cod, No. 001055 Plotted: 8/18/00 5 44 Ref- Dwg. 2970-024-2 Field Book. FLO SHEET Job. No. 20001055 Dwg. No. 2970-024-3 sheet of 1 MIRAMAR CENTRE PHASE II AND III MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT DRAWINGS SUBMITTED Prepared for Florida East Coast Realty By: The Corradino Group 4055 NW 97th Avenue Miami, Florida 33178 Submitted into re the l�ubtic Item!n COQ n with v Water Foeman City Clerk 01_ 199 FLORIDA EAST COAST REALTY, INC. Subr"id into the rebo+ (in connectio ic with on 2/ 9, withh Site Plan Miramar Centre Phase II & III Miami, Florida 6 N.T.S. r cie ,. 199 CORRADINO Architects =ngineers 'Innners eub"tted info 4,:rI in co the Public on, cti';'on with Welter Foema., FLORIDA EAST COAST Ground Floor Plan REALTY, INC. Miramar Centre CORRADINO Phase II & III 199 w Architects=ncineers 'fanners Miami, Florida rLVKIDAL,1JI (_UASI Matter FOe REALTY, INC. Miramar Centre man CORRADINO Phase II & III City Ctet Architects ncineers Planners Miami, Florida 01- 199 QQ FLORIDA EAST COAST REALTY, INC. aSttbn"fte" IRtO the Duh/t.. inM -.A Project View Miramar Centred Phase II & III — Miami, Florida with w F0eMa1 CORRADINO 199 C4 ClOrk Architects `_ngineers "Icnners Subm#ted Into the record in connpction with FLORIDA FAST COAST Elevations E---2 pn REALTY, INC Miramar Centr4ffpr Foemari` CORRADINO Phase II & III U — cit, Calc a chaecrs �� PAs o��A s Miami, Florida .. , Eff Elevations m connec"iara FLORIDA EAST COAST ? 2 '2withREALTY, INC. Miramar Cen re ---- on �24 I ChORRAPDINO itects Phase II & III WaWr Foeman Miami, Florida Citi/ C%rk FLORIDA EAST COAST ��,�y Project Views Wafter Foeman REALTY. INC. Miramar Centre City�,ry�� CORRADINO Phase II & III O ,.rQ�itects .`ngineea Tanners Miami, Florida ,jjL HJT' �l1 ern��d into the nu1�ili.. Item FLORIDA EAST COAST Project Views —`�{"?7--ft REALTY. INC. Miramar Centre WaiterFpe CORRADINO Phase 11 p 10 r 1�� 199 9 9 Cil De Architects -nGmeers Planners Miami, Florida FLORIDA CAST COAST REALTY, INC, SubfIl fitted into the public rAMM 2— --- 1::.111 Project Views Miramar Cen i01 — Phase II & III Miami, Florida Iter Foeman City Clerk COR RAPD 1Architects lVrs nO ers 9 FLORIDA EAST COAST REALTY, INC. MIRAMAR CENTRE Phase II and Phase III SUBMITTAL: MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT DATE: October 20, 2000 INDEX OF DRAWINGS A-1.00 PHASE II AND III- PROJECT DATA MP-1.00 PHASE 1,11,111- GROUND FLOOR PLANS MP-2.00 PHASE 1,11,111- RECREATIONAL DECKS FLOOR PLANS MP-3.00 PHASE 1,11,111- BUILDING ELEVATIONS 4WNWO'"VEMA MP4.00 PHASE 1,11,111- BUILDING ELEVATION MWA FLOWA 3M 75 Ta 3MM4Z ss LA-1.00 PHASE 11- LANDSCAPE GROUND FLOOR PLAN LA-1.01 PHASE III- LANDSCAPE GROUND FLOOR PLAN LA-1.02 PHASE 11- LANDSCAPE RECREATION DECK LA-1.03 PHASE III- LANDSCAPE RECREATION DECK A-2.01 PHASE 11- GROUND FLOOR PLAN A-2.02 PHASE 11- SECOND FLOOR PARKING A-2.03 PHASE II- TYPICAL FLOOR PARKING (3rd-Ht) E A-2.04 PHASE 11- TENTH FLOOR PARKING QL N A-2.05 PHASE 11- ELEVENTH FLOOR RECREATION/ APARTMENTS N A-2.06 PHASE 11- TWELFTH FLOOR STUDIOS/ APARTMENTS A-2.07 PHASE 11- TYPICAL APARTMENTS FLOOR PLAN A-2.08 A-2-09 PHASE 11- TYPICAL UNITS FLOOR PLAN PHASE 11- BUILDING SECTIONS cy A-2.10 PHASE IM BUILDING ELEVATIONS A-2.11 PHASE 11- BUILDING ELEVATION A-2.12 PHASE 11- ENLARGED ELEVATION / SECTION A-3.01 PHASE 111- GROUND FLOOR PLAN A-3.02 PHASE III- SECOND AND THIRD FLOOR PLAN A-3.03 PHASE III- FOURTH AND FIFTH FLOOR PLAN A-3.04 PHASE III- SIXTH AND SEVENTH FLOOR PLAN A-3.05 PHASE III- EIGHTH FLOOR PLAN AND BUILDING SECTION A-3.06 PHASE III- BUILDING ELEVATIONS 01199 MIRAMAR CENTRE PHASE II and PHASE III Project Data Is ZONING CLASIFICATION SD -6 Is NET LOT AREA 1,945 s.f. Phase II ........................ 41,762 s.f. Phase M ........................ 28,568 s.f. Total Net Lot Area ............70,330 s.f. Is GROSS LOT AREA 5'-0■ Phase II ........................ 73,552 s.f. Phase III ........................ 47,921 s.f. Total Gross Lot Area ......... 121,473 s.f Is DENSITY Rear (North Property Line) Dwelling Units Allowed per Covenant .................... 678 Units Dwelling Units Proposed ...................................... 635 Units Is FAR Allowable - Residential ............................................... 7.2 ( 874,606 s.f.) Total ...................................................... 8.4 (1,020,373 s.f.) Proposed - Residential .............................................. 4.6 ( 560,963 s.f.) Total ...................................................... 5.5 ( 671,335 s.f.) ■ FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS Phase II - Residential ............................................... 560,963 s.f. Non -Residential ......................................... 18,112 s.f. Total ...................................................... 579,075 s.f Phase III - Residential ............................................... 0 s.f. Non -Residential ......................................... 92,260 s.f. Total ...................................................... 92,260 s.f. Is SETBACKS 1,945 s.f. Phase II - 20,493 s.f. Fmnt (NE 17th Terrace / North Bayshore Drive) Proposed................................................. Required................................................. 5'-0N Proposed ................................................. 5'-0■ Side (Alley) 5'-0■ Required.................................................. 01 -0 - Proposed................................................. 0'-0■ Rear (North Property Line) 16-1 ■ Required .................................................. 0'-0■ D....posied................................................. 01 -0 - Phase III - 1,945 s.f. Front (NE 4th Avenue) 20,493 s.f. Required.................................................. 51 -0 - Proposed................................................. 5'-0N Side (NE 17th Terrace) Phase III - Ground Level ................................. Required.................................................. 5'-0" Proposed................................................. 5'-0■ Side (Interior Lot) 60,826 s.f. Required................................................. 0 -0 - -0"Proposed Proposed ................................................. 16-1 ■ Rear (Alley) Required .................................................. 0'-0■ Proposed................................................. T-6- Is OPEN SPACE (GREEN SPACE) / PRIVATE RECREATION SPACE Required - 110,372 s.f. (Non-residential)..............................1,208 s.f. (1 s.f/ 50 s.f. over 50,000 s.f.) 560,963 s.f. (Residential).................................56,096 s.f. (1 st/ 10 s.f.) Total.........................................................57,304 s.f. Proposed - Phase II - Ground Level .................................. 1,945 s.f. Phase II - Recreation Level .............................. 20,493 s.f. Phase II - Recreation Rooms ............................ 3,250 s.f. Phase II - Roof ............................................. 12,543 s.f Phase III - Ground Level ................................. 1,595 s f. Phase III - Recreation Level ............................. 21,000 s.f. Total...................................................... 60,826 s.f. OFFSTREET PARKING Apartments (635 units) ................................ 635 Parking Spaces Retail (1,700 s.f)....................................... 2 Parking Spaces Restaurant & Cafe(11,500 s.f.)........................ 15 Parking Spaces Institutional (92,260 s.f.).............................. 93 Parking Spaces Total ...................................................745 Parking Spaces Provided - Phase II - Standard t H.C. Parking Spaces .............. 667 Parking Spaces Phase III - Standard + H.C. Parking Spaces .............. 96 Parking Spaces Total .......................................... 763 Parking Spaces Accessible Parking Spaces Phase II - Required ................................ 15 Spaces Provided ................................ 15 Spaces Phase III - Required ................................ 4 Spares Provided ................................ 4 Spaces Is LOADING BERTHS Required....................................................... 6 Loading Berths Proposed.......................................................... 6 Loading Berths (Class II waiver required for size reduction) Is HEIGHT Allowable.......................................................... Unlimited Proposed.......................................................... 529'-8" ■ BUILDING FOOTPRINT Phase II ........................ 36,800 s.f. Phase III ........................ 19,235 s.f. Total Building Footprint....... 56,035 s.f. Is GROSS FLOOR AREA Phase II ........................ 1,022,923 s.f. Phase III ........................ 151,415 s.f Total Gross Floor Area....... 1,174,338 91 ■ APARTMENT DISTRIBUTION Studio 1 -Bedroom 2- Bedroom 11th Floor 9 units 0 units 2 units 12th Floor 18 units 0 units 4 units 14th -56th (43 Floors) 86 units 344 units 172 units 113 units 344 units 178 units Total No. of Apartments ...................... 635 units S'JbM t 'd intO the public r connection h 0: Wa-ler Foeman 01— 1 9 6itV Cleric MIRAMAR CENTER PHASE I I Miami, Florida OWNER FECR, Inc 100 S.B wflw NKL Sure 1100 Miami, Florida C.S.C. PROJECT NUMBER 2727 OWNER'S PROJECT NUMBER ISSUED FOR: MAM USE SK -M PEW TYPE OF DOCS: SCHEMATICS DRAWN APPROVED w w DATE SCALE: 10/20/00 AS SHOWN 4056 NW 9M AVEME AWt FLORIDA 3 6 TEL 30LIM n URBAN RESOURCE GROUP 'IIIIH„' 1'I IOIU,Ip 'L URBAN A DMUPMENT PINNING LVOSCAPE ARDITECTLRE SITE IRAPHIM o^tQmllu�A� "M "Mom"= SEAL/SIGNATURE This drawing is the property of The C.—din. Group and is sot t be reprotluced or copied In hole o ' Pad. It is n t to bs used o any the, project and to oe ea tumee request. SHEET TITLE (PHASE II AND S) PROJECT DATA SHEET NUMBER A-1.00 CORRADINO C PHASE III PLANT LIST MIRAMAR CENTER PALMS O 3 Quercus virginiona Live Oak 45 gal.. 12-14' x 6'. 4" cal. O DBH CN 25 Cocos nucifera Coconut Palm 72-14' HGT, 5' CW, CLT PD 6 Phoenix doclylifera 'Medjool' FG., 25' CT, 6" col. LJ C.S.C^`f'�IA7C..A PROJECT NUMBER Ligustrum japonicum Tree Ligustrum 8' HT, 6' SPR l!62= OWNER'S PROJECT NUMBER 'Tree form' I SP T Sobd palmetto Cabbage Pdm 10-26' OA, booted. straight trunks SHRUBS AND GROUNnCOVERS TYPE OF DOCS: (I \ hurricane cut, as noted Cl 55-us k VINES icoco Red i'p' Cocoplum 3Gd.. 30"x30'. 36" O.C. CT No. DATE REVISIONS By Cordifine terminalis Ti Plant 3 got., 30" OC IXK 36 Ixora cosei Ixwa ' Super King' 3 gal., 30" x 24" OC LC 35 Lantana comora Y.U.e Sage 1gol., 18" OC LM 238 Lviope .ascan 'Evergreen Giant' 1 gal., 5 to 7 BIBS min., 18' OA RB 199 Ruellia br'ittoniana Mexican Bluebell 1 gal., 18" OC MS 58 Monster. delicioso Monster. 3 gal., 36 X 35", 36" OC RI Rophiolepis indica Indian Ho.thorn 3 Gd., 24"x30", 30" O.C., Full PS Philodendron seiloum Philodendron 3 gal., 36 X 36", 48" OC PX 100 Philodendron 'Xanodu 'Xanadu 3 gal., 30 X 30", 30' OC AZ 80 Alpinia zerumbel Variegated Shelf 3G.L. 30"x36", 36" O.C. 'V.rieg.to DRAWN APPROVED NE 200 Nephrdepis exdtato Seord fern 3Gd.. 30"x30', 30" O.C. CL 8 Crinum lily Crinum 7 Gd., Full HL 134 Hymenocallis lalifolio Spider lily 3Gal., 30"00', 30' O.C. BS Bougo"ilea aP.ctobili, BougainvAlea 5Gd., 48 x 48", TRL MISCELLANEOUS As Needed Stenotophrum aecundatum St. Augustine Grass Certified Sod, 1007E for site est.r.tion. insect/diewse ff e laid tight. rolled As Needed Eucalyptus Mulch For planting beft tree rings, 3" layer. / / / \ \ \ \ \ \ IRRIGATION NOTE ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS TO RECEIVE 10070 COVERAGE BY MEANS OF AN AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM WITH RAIN SENSOR. THE SYSTEM $HALL INCLUDE LOW, MEDIUM k HIGH WATER USE ZONES AS REWIRED PLANTING NOTES: PLANT LIST QUANTITIES ARE PROVIDED FOR CONVENIENCE. IN THE EVENT OF QUANTITY DISCREPANCIES, THE DRAWING SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO VERIFY PLANT MATERIAL QUANTITIES, INCLUDING SOD AND MULCH. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSURE THAT ADEQUATE WATER IS SUFFICIENTLY SUPPLIED IN NECESSARY QUANTITIES TO ALL NEWLY INSTALLED PLANTINGS TO ESTABLISH PLANT MATERIAL. ALL LANDSCAPING SHALL BE INSTALLED ACCORDING TO SOUND NURSERY PRACTICES AND SHALL BE FLORIDA NO. 1 OR BETTER AS GIVEN IN "GRADES AND STANDARDS FOR NURSERY PLANTS STATE OF FLORIDA. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. GROUND COVER PLANTS USED IN LIEU OF GRASS IN WHOLE OR IN PART, SHALL BE PLANTED IN SUCH A MANNER AS TO PRESENT A FINISHED APPEARANCE AND COMPLETE COVERAGE WITHIN 3 MONTHS AFTER PLANTING NO SUBSTITUTIONS SHALL BE MADE WITHOUT WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE L.A. OR OWNER. ALL PLANTING BED AREAS HAVE A MINIMUM OF 24" OF PLANTING SOIL. AND ALL SODDED AREAS SHALL HAVE 2" OF PLANTING SOIL, THE PLANTING SOIL SHALL BE 4070 MUCK AND 6070 SAND, UNLESS FIELD OBSERVATION AND SOIL ANALYSIS DICTATES A DIFFERENT COMPOSITION THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT MAY REWIRE SOIL ANALYSIS TO BE SUSUITTED IF DEEMED APPROPRIATE. ALL SOIL SHALL BE FREE OF WEEDS. LARGE ROCKS (OVER 3" DIAMETER) DEBRIS INCLUDING LIMBS, STEMS, OLD IRRIGATION PIPE. AND OTHER NON-ORGANIC MATERIA $). THE USE OF RECYCLED COMPOST AS A SOIL AMENDMENT IS RECOMMENDED. IN AREAS WHERE PAVED SURFACES ABUT SOD OR MULCH, THE FINAL GRADE LEVEL OF BOTH SURFACES SHOULD BE EVEN. 1 vM �PG N.E. 4th AVENUE \ N S"""hed into r i � ©nnItem eth� Public �� nwith U r"ty rierk GROUND FLOOR LANDSCAPE PLAN 32' 6Sm: / \ \ 0 16' i \ ��- 199 \ \\ URBAN RESOURCE GROUP uTrem w uunuu uA UI&W It DEIELOREMT RMYIC LM07AFE ARM11CIIX SIE TROM �^ �lMolk� rr� tea �st0 SEAL/SIGNATURE SCOTT MINGONET 1428 SHEET TITLE. (PHASE M) GROUND FLOOR LANDSCAPE PLAN SHEET NUMBER LA -1.01 MIRAMAR CENTER PHASE I I I Mami, Flaria. OWNER FECR, Inc I tOD S.BYrapr BAId, BtAr 11D0 Miami, Florida C.S.C^`f'�IA7C..A PROJECT NUMBER I l!62= OWNER'S PROJECT NUMBER I I I ISSUED FOR: I I MA)OR JIBE BPECUIL P6Hf TYPE OF DOCS: (I \ SCHB ATO \\ No. DATE REVISIONS By \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 9� \ DRAWN APPROVED \ MAB MSM \ \ \ DATE SCALE: 10/23/00 AS SHOWN S"""hed into r i � ©nnItem eth� Public �� nwith U r"ty rierk GROUND FLOOR LANDSCAPE PLAN 32' 6Sm: / \ \ 0 16' i \ ��- 199 \ \\ URBAN RESOURCE GROUP uTrem w uunuu uA UI&W It DEIELOREMT RMYIC LM07AFE ARM11CIIX SIE TROM �^ �lMolk� rr� tea �st0 SEAL/SIGNATURE SCOTT MINGONET 1428 SHEET TITLE. (PHASE M) GROUND FLOOR LANDSCAPE PLAN SHEET NUMBER LA -1.01 POOL I SPA PHASE II PLANT LIST 1 1 PALMS 1 � � 1 1 CU 8Coccal010 "ill" Sea Grope FG., 10-14' height OV 12 Quercus virginiono Live Oak 45 gal., 12-14' x 6', 4' cal. O DBH CN 15 Cocos nucifero Coconut Palm 12-14' HGT, 5' GW. CT PD 10 Ph. -I. doctylifero 'Medjool' FG., 25' CT LJ 1 trum aponicu Ligusjm Tree Ligustrum 8' HT, 6' SPR 'Tree form SP Sabal palmetto Cabbage Palm 10-26' OA, booted, straight trunks hurricane cut, as noted SHRUBS AND GROUNDCOVERS & VINFS CI 23y$ l; maco Cocoplum 3Gol., 30"x30", 36' O.C. Red Tip CT 28 Cordyline terminalis Ti Plant 3 got, 30" OC IXK 30 Ixora casei Ixora ' Super King' 3 gal., 30' x 24" OC LC 88 Lantana comoro Yellow Sage tgal.. 16' DC LM 225 Liriope muscori 'Evergreen Giant' I gal.. 5 to 7 BIBS min. 18' OA RB 295 Ruellia b6ttoniono Mexican Bluebell I got., 18" OC MS 20 Monstero dellcioso Monstera 3 got., 36 X 36', 36' OC RI 75 Rophlolepts indica Indian Hawthorn 3 Got.. 24'x30', 30" O.C.. Full PS 8 Philodendron selloum Philodendron 3 gal., 36 X 36', 48' OC PX 140 Philodendron 'Xanadu' 'Xanadu 3 gal., 30 X 30', 30' OC AZ 100 Alpinio zerumbet Variegated Shell 3Gol.. 30'x36', 36" O.C. 'Variegate NE 65 Nephrolepis excitato Sword fern 3G.L. 30'x30', 30' O.C. CL Crinum lily Crimen 7 Gal., Full HL 197 Hymenocallis lotifolia Spider lily 3Gal., 30"x30', 30' O.C. BS 6 Bougoinvilleo spectobilis Bougoinvilleo 5Gal., 48 x 48", TRL MISCELLANEOUS As Needed Slenotophrum ....nd.tum SL Augustine Grass Certified Sod. IOOX for site estoration. insect/di..... free. kud tight, railed As Needed Eucalyptus Mulch For planting beds, free rings. 3' l.". SWwgtted into the public mco,rd inlconnection �with � Z''.on _2 Walter Foeman City Clerk � CT I 1 1 1 � � 1 1 1 I II t rel L, Sub teed into the RI recur in connection ' on �2 L{� IRRIGATION NOTE: `',1s4er Foer ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS TO RECEIVE 1GOX COVERAGE BY MEANS OF AN /'�� �� AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM WITH RAIN SENSOR. C THE SYSTEM SHALL INCLUDE LOW, MEDIUM 8 HIGH WATER USE ZONES AS REQUIRED PLANTING NOTES: PLANT UST QUANTITIES ARE PROVIDED FOR CONVENIENCE. IN THE EVENT OF QUANTITY DISCREPANCIES, THE DRAWING SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO VERIFY PLANT MATERIAL QUANTITIES, INCLUDING SOD AND MULCH. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSURE THAT ADEQUATE WATER IS SUFFICIENTLY SUPPLIED IN NECESSARY QUANTITIES TO ALL NEWLY INSTALLED PLANTINGSTO ESTABLISH PLANT MATERIAL. ALL LANDSCAPING SHALL BE INSTALLED ACCORDING TO SOUND NURSERY PRACTICES AND SHALL BE FLORIDA N0. I OR BETTER AS GIVEN IN 'GRADES AND STANDARDS FOR NURSERY PLANTS', STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. NO SUBSTITUTIONS SHALL BE MADE WITHOUT WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE L.A. OR OWNER. ALL PLANTING BED AREAS HAVE A MINIMUM OF 24' OF PLANTING SOIL, AND ALL SODDED AREAS SHALL HAVE 2' OF PLANTING SOIL. THE PLANTING SOIL SHALL BE 40% MUCK AND 60% SAND, UNLESS FIELD OBSERVATION AND SOIL ANALYSIS DICTATES A DIFFERENT COMPOSITION THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT MAY REQUIRE SOIL ANALYSIS TO BE SUBMITTED IF DEEMED APPROPRIATE. ALL SOIL SHALL BE FREE OF WEEDS, LARGE ROCKS (OVER 3' DIAMETER) DEBRIS INCLUDING LIMBS, STEMS. OLD IRRIGATION PIPE. AND OTHER NON-ORGANIC MATERIA 5). THE USE OF RECYCLED COMPOST AS A SOIL AMENDMENT IS RECOMMENDED. IN AREAS WHERE PAVED SURFACES ABUT SOD OR MULCH, THE FINAL GRADE LEVEL OF BOTH SURFACES SHOULD BE EVEN. N 91- 199 ELEVENTH FLOOR LANDSCAPE PLAN SCALE: 3/32'=1'-0' 0 16' 32' 64' MIRAMAR CENTER PHASE I I Momi. Florida OWNER FECR, Inc Miami. Florida C.S.C. PROJECT NUMBER 0443Ei I OWNER'S PROJECT NUMBER ISSUED FOR: wa,miUSE 54MPEW TYPE OF DOCS: SCHEMATICS DRAWN APPROVED MAB MSM DATE SCALE: 10/23/00 AS SHOWN 4068 NW W74 AVME I A14 FLORIDA MM Ta 306A61 MIM URBAN RESOURCE ;ROUP URBAII It DEVE.WDIT RAM" 1 All ARDIIXCRRE 9E all C •IAmWA014YI • MMFfAq WDM_ h SEAL/SIGNATURE SCOTT MINGONET 1428 This droving is the properly of The Corroding Group and is not to be reproduced or copied in whole or in part. 4 is not to be toe0 on any ot0hvr project and is be rehIr request. SHEET TITLE tPHASE II) ELEVENTH FLOOR LANDSCAPE PLAN SHEET NUMBER LA -1.02 E .02 PHASE II PLANT LIST PALMS CU B Coccolobo uvifera Sea Grape FG., 10-14' height OV 12 Quercus virginlona Live Oak 45 gal., 12-14' x 6', 4" col. O DOH CN 15 Cocos ...ifero Coconut Palm 12-14' HGT, S' GW. CT PO 10 Phoenix doctylifera 'Medjool' FG.. 25' CT LJ 1 Ligustrum japonicum Tree Ligustrum 8' HT, 6' SPR 'Tree form' SP Sabal palmetto Cabbage Palm 10-26' DA, booted, straight trunks hurricane cul, as noted SHRUBS Cl AND GROUNDCOVERS 23 k VINES Chrysobalonus icaco Cocoplum 3Gal., 30"x30". 36" O.C. Red Tip CT 28 CordyNne terminalis Ti Plant 3 got., 30" OC IXK 30 1.— cases Ixoro ' Super King' 3 got., 30' x 24" OC LC 88 Lantana comaro Yellow Sage 1g.I., 18" OC LM 225 Liriope muscori 'Evergreen Gtanl' I gal., 5 to 7 BIBS min., 18" OA RB 295 Ruellio brittaniona Mexican Bluebell 1 got., 18" OC MS 20 Monstero deliciosa Monster. 3 gal., 36 X 36', 36' OC RI 75 Rophidepis indica Indian Hawthorn 3 Gd.. 24"x30", 30" O.C., Full PS 8 Philodendron eelloum Philodendron 3 got., 36 X 36", 48" OC PX 140 Philodendron 'Xanadu' 'Xonodu 3 gal., 30 X 30% 30" OC AZ 100 Alpinio zerumbet Variegated Shelf 30ol., 30"x36". 36" O.C. 'Voriegoto' HE 65 Nephrolepis exaltalo Sword tem 30ol., 30"x30", 30" O.C. CL Crinum lily Crinum 7 Gal., Full HL 197 Hymenocollis latifolia Spitler lily 3Gal., 30"x30", 30" O.C. BS 6 BW90invillso speclabilts Bougainvillea 513aI., 48 x 48". TRL MISCELLANEOUS As Needed Stenctophmm secundotum St. Augustine Gross Certified Sod, 100E for site insect/disease free. restoration. laid tight, rolled As Needed Eucalyptus Mulch For planting beds. tree rings. 3" layer. IRRIGATION NOTE ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS TO RECEIVE 100E COVERAGE BY MEANS OF AN AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM WITH RAIN SENSOR. THE SYSTEM SHALL INCLUDE LOW. MEDIUM a HIGH WATER USE ZONES AS REWIRED PLANTING NOTES-- PLANT OTES:PLANT LIST QUANTITIES ARE PROVIDED FOR CONVENIENCE. IN THE EVENT OF QUANTITY DISCREPANCIES, THE DRAWING SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO VERIFY PLANT MATERIAL QUANTITIES. INCLUDING SOD AND MULCH. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSURE THAT ADEQUATE WATER IS SUFFICIENTLY SUPPLIED IN NECESSARY QUANTITIES TO ALL NEWLY INSTALLED PLANTINGS TO ESTABLISH PLANT MATERIAL. ALL LANDSCAPING SHALL BE INSTALLED ACCORDING TO SOUND NURSERY PRACTICES AND SHALL BE FLORIDA NO. 1 OR BETTER AS GIVEN IN "GRADES AND STANDARDS FOR NURSERY PLANTS STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. GROUND COVER PLANTS USED IN LIEU OF GRASS IN WHOLE OR IN PART, SHALL BE PLANTED IN SUCH A MANNER AS TO PRESENT A FINISHED APPEARANCE AND COMPLETE COVERAGE WITHIN 3 MONTHS AFTER PLANTING NO SUBSTITUTIONS SHALL BE MADE WITHOUT WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE L.A. OR OWNER. ALL PLANTING BED AREAS HAVE A MINIMUM OF 24" OF PLANTING SOL. AND ALL SHALL BE MUCK AND 60X SAND, UNLESS FIELD OBSERVATION ODDED AREAS SHALL HAVE 2' OF PLANTING ADE SOL ANALYSISPLANTINGLDICTATES A40E DIFFERENT COMPOSITION THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT MAY REQUIRE SOL ANALYSIS TO BE SUBMITTED IF DEEMED APPROPRIATE. ALL SOL(( SHALL BE FREE OF WEEDS, LARGE ROCKS (OVER 3" DIAMETER) - GANIC MABERIALS).LUDING THE USE RECYCLED COMPOSTLD IOAS PAD SOILNAMENDMENTOTHER OIS RECOMMENDED. IN AREAS WHERE PAVED SURFACES ABUT SOD OR MULCH. THE FINAL GRADE LEVEL OF BOTH SURFACES SHOULD BE EVEN. nn l ACE _e..TmEerd[R WO the Public rector - ccrac;Mn �� on'1 Warr Foeman ` City Clerk N LANDSCAPE PLAN SCALE: 1/I6"•I'-D' 01=2 199 64 MIRAMAR CENTER PHASE I I Mlomi, Florida FOOWNER , Inc 100SSYw)nrBNd Sub1100 Miami, Florida C.S.C. PROJECT MUNKR 044362001 OWNER'S PROJECT NUMBER ISSUED FOR: MAM USE SPEgALPEidff TYPE OF DOCS: SCHEMATICS DRAWN APPROVED MAB MSM DATE SCALE: 10/23/00 AS SHOWN 4036 W 1061 AVOW NMI FLOFDA 6006 TIM. 301knalm MAR RESOURCE GROUP r rnirirr yr rielrwrrr rry rrTyrNrrt i.c IWBAN it 0EVEL PIDl1 RAN" tANOSAFE AADNECUE SIX MAPHIS eee.er�i wee: �ta �eeat �ar SEAL/SIGNATURE SCOTT MINGONET 14; This drawing the Oa opertY of The Conoit_ Groupe nd is not to be reproduced r copied Mo le pod. It is not to be e d on any the, project oM is to be retumed an n4uest. SHEET TITLE (PHASE II) GROUND LANDSCAPE PLAN SHEET ANNUMBERR LA -1 . W OSOUTH ELEVATION 0" 10' 30' 60' 170' , uOrnitte Vi fi into the connecti_01 Wafter Fc - 9 ctr MIRAMAR CENTER PHASE I I Mimi. Florid. OWNER FECR, Inc ,00s R.etiasbllw Mimi. Florid. C.S.C. PROJECT NUMBER 2727 OWNER'S PROJECT NUMBER ISSUED FOR: VAJOR USE SPECIALFEW TYPE OF DOCS: SCHEMATICS DRAWN APPROVCO NO ILL DATE SCALE: 10/20/00 AS SHOWN AM NVF O7N1 AVE NJE MWA FLORIDA 33176 TEL 3O5JlK PJN URBAN RESOURCE GROUP URBAN It oMMOT KANNI 6 L DSOWE AIMIECDAE 911 OUR16 SEAL/SMGNATURE Thi! droeinq is the prope.ty of The Conadina Group and i not to be reproduced or copi.d in whole or in part. R if nottobe !ed on any the, proj.,t rd is to be tumed rl—L SHEET TITLE MASla PLAN OHAM 1,M) ELEVATIONS SHEET NUMBER MP -4.00 In I■1111\111■il1 111■111■1111■I ■ IN ■1v\u1n■un It,'1n1u1l■■n111w■nIIl ImI■ I ■ ul.y. nrnl: w I■ I■!111\111■/11 111■111■IIII■I ■ .. u1nlu.u• .u. .. nl:u l- r I■l■�illl\111■111 III■III■1111■I ■ I■ I ■IIII\111■III 111■111■1il!■ I ■ r:,aluu nu ■nun un I■ 1■!111\111■III ;;I'm"; I' ■ IN i■IIII■Ill■lll 111■111 ■III!■1 ■ In'.n,.,.u.,l. .m u.nllnmnr. I■ I■!III■111■t/1 111■III■IIII■I ■ 111 '111"1.•1111 rll•1. 1111r: 111' I■ I ■IIII\III■111 111■III■IIII■ I ■ •.• •III 11r ..I, 111 111 ' in I ■iiil\it!■lll 1l1■111■IIII■ I ■ ,•.. •11• Illi l.Illi1111111 ' Ii i ■Ilu\iu■m en■uuuu■ i IN 1■Illi■111■111 IU■111■111!■I ■ I■ I \IIII■III■i1111t11■111■IIII■ I ■ u, mv.n auuwnue:lu lm I■ I ■!III\111■11111111■111■IIII■ I ■ Irl•nu' I1•u.mullln.. naurw I■ I ■1111\111■I/111111■111■IIII■ I ■ 'ul;:,mn.0 un u.nlunlun m I■ I■IIII\111■11111111■111\IIII■I ■ , uununn ulmwl In I■ I ■ IAill■11111111■!11■IIII■ I ■ n..1 .11. n •w l■ nl1u . ur. ll�illl\111■111111�1�111■Illi■I a � I, ■I111�111�1/1111�1�111■Illi■I ■.. ■ I■IIII■111■1111110■111■1111■I ■' un;ru,n 1.1 uuamIa 1unl, I ■ I■IIII\III■11111111■111■Illi■I \I . 1Im 1. n•un. III■m' ■ 1 ■!III■111■/1111111■116■IIN ul:., nen u1 ur. u.u. u•unul. w Milll�lll■1011111■111■lll�■ 111 ■ I■IHI\111■11111111■111 ■1111■I \I .I:II. ■..,1....,11 l.. bq.11 ,I i iii�li\ul■unnu■uuunii 61 ul:nnll ulmnlal....u,.,l w. II Ilnu\ul■nuuu■uuull■i i1 n.'nnulu unnnuunl nl:w � I ■IIII\111■i111t111■111\IIII■ I �I ,.■1 .11.11.111 .. •,1'1.11 I!■ 111 ' ■ I ■IIII\III■IIIIIIII■111■III ■I Oil; a�rnnnlll umu�nl� w ■ I■IIII\111■11111111■111\IIII■I II '.eel .�,.,'�:,. . uvu.u. u. wu,� 1 ■nn\ul:nnln��nlflili i 1111 ■ I■IIII■III�Ii111111■II1�1111■I-■I min m 'nr•n.0 wnulln. unln IIr ■ I■!111\III■IIIIIIII■111■IIII■1 ■1 :nul,... uuunn 1. nlnul ■ I ■IIII■111■IIIIIIII■111■IIII■ I \I uu.u.uuu u•n,ullur. ■ I ■IIII\111■/tIIIIi1■111■IIII■ I ■I nu uuuul. un1n11: la'._Ilr ■ I■!lll■111■llilllot■111■IIII■I all u■r.u. uuulnnn..uwnr.. ■ I■IIII\III■11111111■111■1111■I 11 unn uv.•u wu1.w a nnulnn. I ■ I■IIII\111■t111t111■111■IIII■I ■I In : nnnlu ul. u.ull. n1.1111,w � ul ■ I■IIII\111■/111111/■l1110w1111■I 111uumnuua.ml,w � I�:III■111�1�111111�111 �111i�1 11 ■ I■IIII\111■I/111111■III\IIII■1 all mlnnn..l .unuu. u.nnulm. ■ 1■Illf\■■ 1 ■1 1.11 I,111 ■■11111\III■llilllll■111 Mill I■ ■■1 u'. nnllum..ruunuu 1. nllunncmu' .Iii■tlt�Itt1111 SIJ!■ ............I1 ::::!::: iiitu `i1Jl■ . 1H111. 1.... 51l I tltl..t.t /■ 111111\111■It1 1�I■III■IIII■ I \I ' n nn.lno n,• .u•uu nuu 1\ Im;III\iiimlll Ill■lil\llllnl MIN 1\ I ■!IIIIII■Ill IU■111\IIII■ I ■1 1 1.3 111 'lu'un:u..■.u. m.. nl:nlu ul' in I■!111■111■gl It1■111\IIII\1 II Iln.;uo nu uu 11nl', . in I■1111\111■/11 IU■III■Illi■I 11 u.uul .nu.nw lam _ 1■ I ■IIII■111■ill 1/I■111\III'II I II 1■ Ii1111\ill■lI1 I1101110111101 ■1 i 1■ Il'iI■111■Itl IU■111■illIa] ■1 'Iln.nu wl ul. u.rul"m 1■ lilill\111■!11 111■111■IIII■1 ■t '111 I, 11'I/..1111 .r11 •. •ti111I:1I1 1■ I��ill■111■Ill III■111 \�11!il i1 i■ I IIIII\Ill■tl1 Ill■111■ill!■ 111 �1•I n11"u •.1 uv. pl .. a:.l.lu Ill'-i.:l. 1■ i ■IIII■til■t/1 1�1■111■III'.■ I ■1 1■ 1 ■illi\111■/ll IU■111■llll■ 1 II 1■ lilill\111■i11111I1■111■Illlfl 11 .ul uu.uu unll o•, u, iu 1■ I■!II��111■1111�1■Illillll�l ■1 1■ lilill\111■11111111■IIIIIIII■I ■1 r..1 mnl nu u•mun: m 1■ lilill■H1■Illlllil■111■IIII■I ■1 11 1IIIIIA111■iillllil■IlliF i■ 1 ■1 rll 1•u•11uu 1.. uTl,ii lll 1■ 1 �Illl\ill■11111111■111\lily 111 1■ I ■IIII\111■llllllll■111■IIII■ 111 nnn-,u.1 .u.u•11. 1. ul u,lnu I■ liilll\III■Illllttl■111■Illi■I II 11 w u'.. 1 u.url■ulnunu I ■'III\III�Ot11t0■III\IIII■ 111 gni nlluu.n•n nu....rvuu:m' 11 I Yllll■til■1111111■ltl�lll i I i1 1\ IIIII!\111■1111110■111■IIPl1 is 1 it u 1 ■ilililii�iiiiiiiiiiiiii;I i III I,pm.p .u. U•w ...II,,r 111' Illi-1l�II1�111�1�1111�i!�Ill.rlll',�I is 1■ I!'III\111■1111101■111\III'■I 11 CII.I111I,..l Illi /1.,,• if•1I111ii 111 ' I■ lilll�\111■llllllll■Ili\IIII\I is ' II i .1 .11..1.11. 1. •,i1111. 111' 1\-1 IIIII\III■111111/!■111■IIII■ 111 It on 1..11....1. I\ I IIIII■111■0111/ll■111■111.1 i ■■ It 1ii111\tll�iuiiili�luAllll�i iii nrn lnl,l.l .u.uu,. .1.. lnnu _ I■liilll\111■Illlllti■111■IIII■I I� 'ui un•u .u.0 a,•u.u'.Inniu I\ l it 111011 l■11111111■Ill will in 1 t■ I\ lilill\111■Illlllil■111■111!11 1■ 'u1 ucnu.nnnn. l.•n,nmm 1■ IIIIII\111■011111/■III\IIIIII �■ uI uvinnu. u.uvl,I: n1. IN IIIIII\III■11111111■111■IIIIII ■■ I,I.n 11'11..1 .11..1.11. U.0 11,n III i I■ IIIIII\111■Ilt11t1t■111■11171 \■ 'ul :m n.l unnnn ua: ulnmi I\ I, mlIll\111■I10111man111 ■Ill'\ I ■■ 101 IIII\111m01111f111110114i \■ II I IIIII■!11■ti1111t1■111■III!■ 11■ lmlunu u•m.ullnr. II liilll\111■11111111■111\IIII■I !■■■ ,• 11 n:11.. 111: I■ I�illl�ltl■1111111■Ill�lll1 \1 1■■ ■1111■111■illlllll■111 will I■ ■■■ Inmm nuu •.1 .nnnw unnulluu u.11 IBM M1116 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ 11iilItlll IIID■ 1 ■ 111 .—. .—. .—. .-- I_� I^ .1111HUN, ll1liiiil`il,■'11Q N IS ■ ■ ■ ■ i i �� ■lRUUUUME .tJ■Ll •••lnami•• [Mail;IILJ ul 11 INE 1% ■1■1■ ■1■il ■1■li ■1NAM \11 .�.�� II■II 11■II Ilill 'IIII'■1 ■1111■ ■111111111/ ■11111 ■11111 II11 �; IIIIII 111111 . 1-'■, _.. I ... .,. . ll 111 1'.110.111...111.■ 11111 1111111 Irl --�_ — — ---- �_ �•'.p �-� IlMil I_. � Irl l Dllll/Ill/l/llll IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII (IIIIIIII �'_" ���� ' �"' " � � I► ��. �,iri.��i���.. _il 111- loom — ���������������������������������� a ■r uu _ IIIII ■u■ ■n■ ■u. — — �II . .'I. nl Irllri■r Ir----- _ll. ■11■ ■Il■ ■Il• � �� _■■_I_Ilillll■ 1�1■II�L -_ - ���:�m::Ir■111■ •ZC•■ • 40931111 QF AYBAE 111111 Fill 7701 TEL 706#40777 J1ANfEN � Su!*�tNd into F 48 ttherecOrd its pPublic 'fiction with City Clerk Rv RECREATIONAL DECKS SCALE: 1/10•.1._0. o zo' w' 80' 01-- 1199 MIRAMAR CENTER PHASE I I Munni. %rtda OWNER FECR, Inc ,OS S BYcplr E,rd S6 „00 Mionu. Fonda C.S.C. PROJECT NUMBER 2727 OWNER'S PROJECT NUMBER ISSUED FOR: W"USE WE= PEW TYPE OF DOCS: SCHEMATICS DRAWN APPRO.ED DATE SCALE: 10/10/00 AS SHOWN "W WM A%0W NNR FLOF" = Ta 706311107775 URBAN RESOURCE CROUP merW a m¢Ovgor gJ/U10 tM05SITEE CRME SITEOM7WNCS,LS OMma,WI wm= IWY iMl11YO.ili SUI/SIGNATURE This drosing is the property of The Conadino Croup and is not to be reproduced o copied in show or in part. It is not to be sad an a y ther project and is to be returned on rpueet. SHEET TITLE MASTER PLAN VHASE UW) REC. DEM SHEET NUMBER MP -200 SERVICE CORROOR nooR L +0'_0 I .�� ��iAi::.p�urs.a.�c..• �44S9J..♦ . R =ewvr.y � ♦�vlCi�...1 �\ CORRADINO IRRIGATION NOTE ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS TO RECEIVE 100% COVERAGE BY MEANS OF AN AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM WITH RAIN SENSOR. THE SYSTEM SHALL INCLUDE LOW. MEDIUM 4 HIGH WATER USE ZONES AS REQUIRED PLANTING NOTES PLANT LIST QUANTITIES ARE PROVIDED FOR CONVENIENCE. IN THE EVENT OF QUANTITY DISCREPANCIES. THE DRAWING SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO VERIFY PLANT MATERIAL OUANTITIES. INCLUDING SOD AND MULCH. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSURE THAT ADEOUATE WATER IS SUFFICIENTLY SUPPLIED IN NECESSARY QUANTITIES TO ALL NEWLY INSTALLED PLANTINGS TO ESTABLISH PLANT MATERIAL. ALL LANDSCAPING SHALL BE INSTALLED ACCORDING TO SOUND NURSERY PRACTICES AND SHALL BE FLORIDA NO. 1 OR BETTER AS GIVEN IN 'GRADES AND STANDARDS FOR NURSERY PLANTS', STATE OF FLORIDA. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. GROUND COVER PLANTS USED IN LIEU OF GRASS IN WHOLE OR IN PART, SHALL BE PLANTED IN SUCHA MANNER AS TO PRESENT A FINISHED APPEARANCE AND COMPLETE COVERAGE VATHIN 3 MONTHS AFTER PLANTING NO SUBSTITUTIONS SHALL BE MADE WITHOUT WRITTE AUTHORIZATION FROM THE L.A. DR OWNER. ALL PLANTING BED AREAS HAVE A MINIMUM OF 24" OF PLANTING SOIL. AND ALL SODDED AREAS SHALL HAVE 2' OF PLANTING SOIL. THE PLANTING SOIL SHALL BE 40% MUCK AND 60% SAND, UNLESS FIELD OBSERVATION AND SOIL ANALYSIS DICTATES A DIFFERENT COMPOSITION THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT MAY REQUIRE SOIL ANALYSIS TO BE SUBMITTED IF DEEMED APPROPRIATE. ALL SOIL SHALL BE FREE OF WEEDS, LARGE ROCKS (OVER 3" DIAMETER) DEBRIS (INCLUDING LIMBS. STEM$, OLD NtRIGADON PIPE. AND OTHER NON-ORGANIC MATERIALS). THE USE OF RECYCLED COMPOST ASA SOIL AMENDMENT IS RECOMMENDED. IN AREAS WHERE PAVED SURFACES ABUT SOD OR MULCH, THE FINAL GRADE LEVEL OF BOTH SURFACES SHOULD BE EVEN. Submitted into rcCcOr i in /YO tits PUb1lC or 1' fton With N "-A°y clR?m m LANDSCAPE PLAN 1 ll \/�� SME: 1/16'=1'-0% hI— IAA. DRAWN APPROVED MAB MSM DATE SCALE: 10/23/00 AS SHOWN 4055 NW 97th AVENUE MIAMI. FLORIDA 33178 TEL 305.594.0735 URBAN RESOURCE GROUP Ulft It DEVELOPMENT RAINING UVOSERPE91 ��C1M6 a^0IIOlmm IWY CISIL w SEAL/SIGNATURE SCOTT MINGONET 14 This droving is the property of The C.—din. Group and is not to be reproduced or copied rin hole or part. It 4-1 to e to ebe aretu nn _1ed oher Prop-tn,mt. and egvest. SHEET TRLE (PHASE HD LANDSCAPE PLAN SHEET NUMBER LA -1.03 MIRAMAR CENTER PHASE I I I PHASE ill PLANT LIST Miami. Florida OWNER PALMS FECR Inc OV J Ouercua virginiona Live Oak 45 gal., 12-14' x 6', 4' cal. O DBH 1 CN 25 Cocos nucilera Coconut Palm 12-14' HCT, 5' CW. CT 100 83K" Bid, SUk 1100 PD 6 Phoenix tloctylifera 'Madjod' FG., 25' CT, 6' cd. Miami, Florida LJ Ligustrum japonicum Tree Ligustrum B' HT, 6' SPR C.S.C. PROJECT NUMBER T_ farm `7I VWZWl SP 1 Sobel Palmetto Cabbage Palm 10-26' OA, Dooled, straight trunks hurricane cul, as noted SHRUBS AND R IN O Rc k VINF-9 OWNER'S PROJECT NUMBER CI 55ChrysoDalanus icaco Cocoplum 3Cd., 30'x3O', 36" O.C. Red Tp CT Cordyfine termindis Ti Plant 3 gel., 30" OC ISSUED FOR: IXK 36 Ixoro cosei Nora ' Super King' 3 gal., 30' x 24' OC MlL10A USE LC 35 Lantana .amara Yellow Sage 1901.. 18' OC WECIALFIE 1 LM 236 Liriope muscon 'Evergreen Giant' 1 gel.. 5 to 7 8185 min., 18" OA - TYPE OF DDCS: RB 199 Ruellio brittoniana Mexican Bluebell 1 gel., 18" OC SCHE ATO M5 58 Monstero deliciaso Monsters 3 gel., 36 X 36', 36' OC RI Raphidepis indica Indian Hawthorn 3 Gal., 24'x30'. 30" O.C., Full No. GATE PS Philodendron selloum Philodendron 3 gel., 36 X 36'. 48' OC REVISIONS BY PX 100 Philodendron 'Xcnodu' 'Xanadu 3 gel., 30 X 30', 30' OC AZ 80 Alpinia —mbet Variegated Shelf 3G.1., 30'x36'. 36" O.C. 'Voriegala' NE 200 Nephrolepis exdlola Sword fern 3Gul., 30'00", 30' O.C. CL B Crinum lily Crinum 7 Cat.. Full HL 134 Hymenocullis lolifolio Spider IRy 313d.. 30'00', 30' O.C. 85 Bougoimrilleo spectabilis Bougainvillea SGd., 48 . 48', TRL MS MS MISCE f AN Ic - As Needed fa Stenotophrum —down, St. Augustine Gross (;.rtifi.d Sod, 100% 5 site resect /disease ft— laid laid tight, rdied POOL 4Er_ As Needed Eucalyptus Mulch Fa planting bed.. tree rings. 3 layer. _ IRRIGATION NOTE ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS TO RECEIVE 100% COVERAGE BY MEANS OF AN AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM WITH RAIN SENSOR. THE SYSTEM SHALL INCLUDE LOW. MEDIUM 4 HIGH WATER USE ZONES AS REQUIRED PLANTING NOTES PLANT LIST QUANTITIES ARE PROVIDED FOR CONVENIENCE. IN THE EVENT OF QUANTITY DISCREPANCIES. THE DRAWING SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO VERIFY PLANT MATERIAL OUANTITIES. INCLUDING SOD AND MULCH. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSURE THAT ADEOUATE WATER IS SUFFICIENTLY SUPPLIED IN NECESSARY QUANTITIES TO ALL NEWLY INSTALLED PLANTINGS TO ESTABLISH PLANT MATERIAL. ALL LANDSCAPING SHALL BE INSTALLED ACCORDING TO SOUND NURSERY PRACTICES AND SHALL BE FLORIDA NO. 1 OR BETTER AS GIVEN IN 'GRADES AND STANDARDS FOR NURSERY PLANTS', STATE OF FLORIDA. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. GROUND COVER PLANTS USED IN LIEU OF GRASS IN WHOLE OR IN PART, SHALL BE PLANTED IN SUCHA MANNER AS TO PRESENT A FINISHED APPEARANCE AND COMPLETE COVERAGE VATHIN 3 MONTHS AFTER PLANTING NO SUBSTITUTIONS SHALL BE MADE WITHOUT WRITTE AUTHORIZATION FROM THE L.A. DR OWNER. ALL PLANTING BED AREAS HAVE A MINIMUM OF 24" OF PLANTING SOIL. AND ALL SODDED AREAS SHALL HAVE 2' OF PLANTING SOIL. THE PLANTING SOIL SHALL BE 40% MUCK AND 60% SAND, UNLESS FIELD OBSERVATION AND SOIL ANALYSIS DICTATES A DIFFERENT COMPOSITION THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT MAY REQUIRE SOIL ANALYSIS TO BE SUBMITTED IF DEEMED APPROPRIATE. ALL SOIL SHALL BE FREE OF WEEDS, LARGE ROCKS (OVER 3" DIAMETER) DEBRIS (INCLUDING LIMBS. STEM$, OLD NtRIGADON PIPE. AND OTHER NON-ORGANIC MATERIALS). THE USE OF RECYCLED COMPOST ASA SOIL AMENDMENT IS RECOMMENDED. IN AREAS WHERE PAVED SURFACES ABUT SOD OR MULCH, THE FINAL GRADE LEVEL OF BOTH SURFACES SHOULD BE EVEN. Submitted into rcCcOr i in /YO tits PUb1lC or 1' fton With N "-A°y clR?m m LANDSCAPE PLAN 1 ll \/�� SME: 1/16'=1'-0% hI— IAA. DRAWN APPROVED MAB MSM DATE SCALE: 10/23/00 AS SHOWN 4055 NW 97th AVENUE MIAMI. FLORIDA 33178 TEL 305.594.0735 URBAN RESOURCE GROUP Ulft It DEVELOPMENT RAINING UVOSERPE91 ��C1M6 a^0IIOlmm IWY CISIL w SEAL/SIGNATURE SCOTT MINGONET 14 This droving is the property of The C.—din. Group and is not to be reproduced or copied rin hole or part. It 4-1 to e to ebe aretu nn _1ed oher Prop-tn,mt. and egvest. SHEET TRLE (PHASE HD LANDSCAPE PLAN SHEET NUMBER LA -1.03 Q�+mtted into the 1��'nnecti ��t n with cfter Foem� 22,ik N TENTH FLOOR PARKING CRY Cie& SW: 1/16':1._0. 0 16' 32' 61' r--� MIRAMAR CENTER PHASE I I Miami. Florida OWNER FECR, Inc 100S.Bl Mians9lod-Sub 1100 Miam; Florida C.S.C. PROJECT NUMBER 2727 OWNER'S PROJECT NUMBER ISSUED FOR: M&M USE SPECK PEFW TYPE OF DOCS: SCHEMATICS DRAWN APPROVED w or DATE SCALE: 10/20/00 AS SHOWN 4= W SM AABME OAK ROMA SO! 7L 706'AIO= URBAN RESOURCE CROUP U" A DEEWMENT RAN" UNIIDSCAPE AR04XCRK AR OMP11C5 �n.o�� ZOOWto "m6m= SEAL/SIONATURE This drawing is the property of The Corradino Group and is not to be r,p,,d,ced o copied in whole o port. It s not to be tooebe�ewmed onrr awe ii and is SHEET TITLE (PHASE 11) TENTH FLOOR PARKING SHEET NUMBER A-2.04 PRECAST WHIELL `. SET IN (TVP AT SPACES) TYPICAL PAWM SPACES DETAIL SCALE : 1/4"= 1'-O" TYPICAL HANDICAP PARKWj SPACES DETAIL SCALE : 1/4"- 1'-O" 'c the Public 1"IM'cn with bemaa ttfteq�-'F 114II t ofo* SCALE: 1/16"=1.-0" 0 16' 32' 64' 01- 199 MIRAMAR CENTER PHASE I I Miami. Flondo OWNER FECR, Inc 100 S.B6uyre BNd SAA 1100 Miami. Florida C.S.C. PROJECT NUMBER 2727 OWNER'S PROJECT NUMBER ISSUED FOR: M#USE MCK PBW TYPE OF DOCS: SCHEMATICS DRAWN APPROVED w w DATE SCALE: 10/20/00 AS SHOWN 4093 W 9M AEBtE NKK Fl01DA SM 7a 3OL"Wim MM It DEM30 ENT RAM LAMWAPE QNTECTUAE SITE GIAPHI S ==1110 ^u =A llow� .7n mu mai SEAL/SIGNATURE This Browing is the property of The Corradino Group and is not to be reproduced or cop ad in hole o art P. It is not to be used on any other project and i to be remmee on Maueat. SHEET TITLE (PHASE II) TYPCAL FLOOR PARKING (3rd -9th) SHEET NUMBER A-2.03 -2. STANARD PARKING SPACES = 59 HANDICAP PARKING SPACES = 2 TOTAL SPACES = 61 sub �bed into the Pub in i1ftl o. �rzeatton t N Q✓t��tith SECOND FLOOR PARKING SCALE! 1/ ft tor FOem 16' 32' 64' 0 city Cie,* 0 1 r n MIRAMAR CENTER PHASE I I Miami, Florida OWNER FECR, Inc 100 S.B'bwm BAd, Bub 1100 Miami, FI.Hdp C.S.C. PROJECT NUMBER 2727 OWNER'S PROJECT NUMBER ISSUED FOR: MAIOR USE SPEM PEW TYPE OF DOCS: SCHEMATICS DRAWN APPROVED A W DATE SCALE: 10/20/00 AS SHOWN 4=NMT 10%AVENE YAIl RAIflA 600'6 UL 006940766 URBAN RESOURCE GROUP Igplr� I! URtN tll ��� If H<�, Ift UL IARNI d DEVROPt[N1 PLANIM LMOSCAPE AROIIECRm SITE 01ARICS a mu mm mal mum sm SEAL/SIGNATURE This drowing Is the property of The C—dino Group and is not to be reproduced or ,pied in chole o port. It is not to be eorelumed lon rreq—t. rojIlt a d is I. be SHEET TITLE (PHASE II) SECOND FLOOR PARKING SHEET NUMBER A-2.02 RECREATION (APARTMENT 0 10' 20' 40' SCALE: 3/32'•1._0. 01- 199 MIRAMAR CENTER PHASE I I Miami, Florida OWNER FECR, Inc ,00 sererl. ewe sa. noo Miami. Florida C.S.C. PROJECT NUMBER 2727 OWNERS PROJECT NUMBER ISSUED FOR: MAUSE SPECKPEW �� rYPFEE O,OO F �DCS:: �a X IGTf TO DRAWN APPROVED FO Tm DATE SCNF: 10/20/00 AS SHOWN 4050 W 9/11 AMM LUK FLORDA 331n TEL 305M= URBAN RESOURCE CROUP 1 Ii 11f 111 11 1111[.111 111 1111111Itf — m m a ME.~ Flw sc UIM)SCIPE wK7EIL AK SITE OmPI16 a^=Amww 4m.a wFalol eas SEAL/SIGNATURE 11C ith s drawing i the Da�DertY of e Corta6no Group d not be reproduced or copied le or M "'t. It is l to be ed on r ether project and is to be retume0 on req—t. (TITLE PHASE 1) ELEVENTH FLOOR RECREATION/APART. SHEET NUMBER A-205 Ito the --vn wjf eOn-4Q a4 FLOORS 14th - 56th Wa*r Foes TYPICAL APARTMENT FLOOR y Q*wc 0 B' 16' SY 01-- 199 MIRAMAR CENTER PHASE I I Mami, Florida FECR, Inc 100 s.Bi"m BML, Sti 1100 Miami, Florida C.S.C. PROJECT NUMBER 2727 OWNER'S PMECT NUMBER ISSUED MR: MAM USE Mmpew TYPE OF DOCS: SCHEMATICS DRAWN APPROVED FO n. DATE SCALE: 10/20/00 AS SHOWN 41155W IAF AVENUE WIK /tCIVOA =0111 TEL 305JKDM URBAN RESOURCE GROUP IOlsll, If II II[NI11111 ,11tUrl!\ IIt URBAN III O MOT I'LAN 6 LANDSCAPE WIWIECNE ATE ONItI.S SEAL/SIGNATURE This drawing is the proper of The Conodino Group and not to be reproduced pr Copied in 'hole in part. 11 is n t to be ad on any the, projeof and to to be r t—d on request. SHEET TITLE WHASE� 1) TYPICAL APARTMENT BOOR (14tr56tt) SHEET NUMBER A-207 n 1 - -2. • TYPE D TYPE C TYPE D TYPE D TYPE D TYPE D 5o TYPE D TYPED TYPE D 1 � 1 \ 1 / TYPE B TYPE B , 42'- O- •2•-e. ELECTRICAL MECH. 2 4 STORAGE c p. 2 \' TYPE B / / TYPE B _ I 1 C I D 1 1 I 1 TYPE D a0 TYPE D TYPE D TYPE D TYPE D TYPED TYPE D TYPED E C 0 I ll S I� II 11 — II PRIVATE BALCONY (TYP) Sack, tted into �� I► ►► I� rOcOW in $ e pu cer�r���t/lie II — — ►r onQns n w th W r Foe 1 -2 N TWELFTH FLOOR PLAN T STUDIOS /APARTMENTS SGVE: 3/12'•,'-0" 0 To' 20' 40. 01- 199 s IIRAMAR CENTER PHASE I I MI FWdo OWNER FECR, Inc MiI Florido C.S.C. PROJECT NUMBER 2727 OWNER'S PROJECT NUMBER ISSUED FOR: AU1MUSE &I= PEW TYPE OF DOCS: SCHEMATICS DRAWN APPROVED w TPP DATE SCAUL 0/20/00 AS SHOWN AOS PIW WL AVE" MAK FLOMA MUS m masplam RRLN RESOURCE GROUP unuu n uutwm ur mnmrt at nm t OErAEWIOIT PLNSK LNBSI'APE N1o11ECRK Sill OWNIC$ W+W.! 0*411IPW eaP rr fAat Ow X/SIGNATURE Thi, drowiny it the property of Me Corrodi,o Croup cz: i, ^ot to Ue reP'roduced o cpvied "hole o Po`L Il i, 1 to W u,ed v any other project and ie to be rctumed an reoue,t. HEET TITLE (PHASE 1) TWELFTH FLOOR STUDM/APAW. HEFT NUMBER A-206 _ _ _ _ TOP ECH_PTOUS. + 529'-8"F NA ROOF -----58TH FLOOR _ APARTMENTS_ A ELEV. + 471'-0' --------------_ ----_551H fLOOR _APARTMENTS AELEV. + 452'-4" —SITH FLOOR _ APARTUENTS ELEV. + 453'-8" _______________ —53RD fL00R_ APNtTMENTS ;L ELEV. + 445'-0" _______________ _ — _ — —5, D TLOOR _ APARTMENTS ,L ELEV. + 4J8'-4" Y_______________ __---51ST FLOOR _ APARTMENTS_ ,t ELEV. + 427'-8" --------------_ --_--50TH FLOOR _ APARTMENTS_ AELEV. + 419'-0' --------------_ -----49TH FLOOR _ APARTMENTS ,Li ELEV. + 410' -4' --------------- ----_111TH FLOOR _ APARTMENTS AELEV. + 401' -B- -----117TH FLOOR = APARTMENTS A ELEV. + 393'-0" -----46TH FLOOR_APARTMENTS ,ELEV. + 384'-4" _______________ -----45TH FLOOR _ APARTMENTS_0 ELEV. + 375'-2" --------------_ _---_44T14LW _ APARTMENT5 0ELEV. + 367'-0" --------------_ —43R9.E NR _APARTMENTS 0 ELEV. + 358'-4" . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -----42N0 BOOR_ APARTMENTS 0EL-. + 349'-B' --------------- - — — — —41ST FLOOR _ APARTMENTS A ELEV. + 341'-0- , _______________ _40TH FLOOR=APARTMENTS ELEV. + 332'-4- _______________ —__—_39TH FLOOR _ APARTMEN75 + 323'-8' --------------_ -----381H FLOOR = APARTMENTS Jy ELEV. + 315'-0' --------------_ _37TH RQOR _ APARTMENTS—`P ELEV. + 306'-4' -----361H FLOOR _ APARTMENTS AELEV. + 297'-1" --------------_ ----_35TH FLOOR =APARTMENTS_,ELEV. + 289'-0' -----LATH FLOOR =APARTMENTS A ELEV. + 280'-4- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - -----33RQ 11.2CE_ APARTMENTS AELEV. + 271'-8-_______________ -----IMP TL00R_ APARTMENTS ELEV. + 263'-0' --------------_ ��yF —LIST FLOOR _ APARTMENTS �,yP ELEV. + 254'-4' _ — — — — — — — — — — — — — — _ -----mTH nom APARTMENTS ELEV. + 245'-B' --------------_ -----29TH FLOOR _ APARTMENTS AELEV. + 237'-0-. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ----_ZBTH FLOOR=APARTMENTS A ELEV. + 228'-4" _______________ -----27TH FLOOR _APARTMENTS AELEV. + 219'-8-_______________ ----_26TH FLOOR - APARTMENTS ______fir AELEV. + 211'-0" --------------_ _----25TH fLOOR _ APARTMENTS ELEV. + 201'-10' _______________ — — — — —241H FLOOR _ APARTMENTS ,A ELEV. + 193'-8" —___-23RD FLOOR_ APARTMENTS ,L ELEV. + 185'-0" --------------_ — — — — —22ND fL00R _APARTMENTS ,ELEV. + 176'-4' .' --------------- —21 ST f'LOOR -APARTMENTS ,L ELEV + 167'-e' ----_20TH fL00R_APARTMENTS AELEV. + 159'-0- --------------_ -----19TH FLOOR _ APARTMENTS ELEV. + 150'-4' _______________ -----IB7H FLOOR _ APARTMENTS ELEV. + 141'-8" --------------_ -----17TH FLOOR=APARTKIIIE SELEV. + 133'-0- --------------_ -----16TH FLOOR =APARTM____ENTS __ ELEV. + 124'-4' _____ -----15TH FLOOR _ APARTMENTS A ELEV. + 115'-8" --------------_ 14TH FLOOR - STUDIO fL. ______________ ELEV. + 107'-0' -----12TH FLOOR - S11JD1O_fL_ ELEV. + 98'-4- 8'-4----- -- — — —11TH FLOOR =REC_ DECK_ ELEV. + 89'-B" — — -- _PARKING z — —10Th FLOOR ,1 ELEV. + 81'-6" _ _ ,�+ .-----PARKING---9TH FLOOR— 73'-4- _ _ _ _ _PARKING -_ _8TH FLOOR_ELEV. + 65'-2" — — — — PARKING _ _ _7TH FLOOR— ELEV. + 57'-0" _ _ — — — — PARKING_ --6TH FLOOR_ ELEV. + 48'-10" —_ ----PARKING=--5TH FLOOR— 0ELEV. + 40'-B' ---- PARKING_--4RD FLDORELEV. + 32'-6- —_ ---- PARKIN2=--3RD FLOOR 0ELEV. + 24'-4" PARKING - 2N0 FLOORA. ELEV. + 15'-0" —_-- LOBBY_ ---U I NOTE: ELEV. HEIGHT 0'-0-- IrItc the public cont eMon with Walter Fmr QtY 01- 199 MIRAMAR CENTER PHASE I I Miami, Florida OWNER FECR, Inc 1017 smm" aha. sur nao Miami, Rento C.S.C. PROJECT NUMBER 2727 OWNER'S PROJECT NUMBER ISSUED FOR: MAJOR USE 'EM PERA TYPE OF DOCS: SCHEMATICS DRAWN APPROVED M TPP DATE SCALE: 10/20/00 AS SHOWN 4068IIW 8781 AVENUE HAAT FL O DA 33178 718. 30591CM URBAN RESOURCE GROUP t Nrif 111 II t�Ill Nltt tll tltl<It IIA ilt LIM ✓a OEWLO'YFRT RAW116 U11MM AE ARD1XCARE 91E OtMNCS o^� IolAp� ra rwAMq �eH SEAL/SIGNATURE This drowing i. the property of The Co—dino Group end i. net to be reproduced or copied in .hot. o n Poi.rt. It not to be us.d on any otter project end i. G to turned request SHEET TITLE q ASE u ButDm SECTto1Js SHEET NUMBER A-209 OTYPICAL 1 BEDROOM APT. (UNIT A) (795 S.F.) 0 4' B' 16' SCALE 1// -+I' -0 - OTYPICAL STUDIO APT (UNIT TYPE C) (480 S.F.) 0 4' B' 16 SCALE; 1/4 -=I' -0- OTYPICAL 2 BEDROOM APT. (UNIT B) (%5 S.F.) 0 4' B' IN' SCALE: 1/4•=1'-0• subr tfecr record . 6 nto th 'km car I., .0 Publfc, 1 � rj A ��t, I Wdlter roe � ao O4 TYPICAL STUDIO APT (UNIT TYPE D) (400 S.F.) 0 1 O 4' S' 16' SC11E: I/4•,1'-0• MIRAMAR CENTER PHASE I I Miomi, Florida OWNER FECR, Inc Miami, Florida C.S.C. PROJECT NUMBER 2727 OWNER'S PROJECT NUMBER ISSUED FOR: MAM USE SPEMLPEW TYPE OF DOCS: SCHEMATICS DRAWN APPROVED P.D. ILL DATE SCALE: 10/20/00 AS SHOWN 4063 pW SARI AVENUE tall PLOfCA 000W TEL 30L%Q= URBAN RESOURCE GROUP 1 1111{111 11 1111[NI11 111 /311111111 111 AM t DE110001 MANN LOSSCAPE MDIUW SIE WAN/C5 e lArau IWAW Wn[MA lr rAal WaoA u� SEAL/SIGNATURE This drawing is the property of The Comadino Group and is not to the a produced r copied shale a part. It is not to be sed on on, other project and is to be retumed on reauml. SHEET TREE (%am1) TY MCAL urns BOOR PLAN SHEET NUMBER A-208 OTYPICAL 1 BEDROOM APT. (UNIT A) (795 S.F.) 0 4' 8' 16' SCALE: 1/4'-1'-0' OTYPICAL STUDIO APT (UNIT TYPE C) (480 S.F.) 0 4' 8' 16' bvu: 1/4 •I'-0' OTYPICAL 2 BEDROOM APT. (UNIT B) (965 S.F.) 0 4' 8' 16' SCALE: 1/4'-1 .-0 ' re� 111to the In C. Public canZh n with i ")te(r ��p� it s OTYPICAL STUDIO APT (UNIT TYPE D) (400 S.F.) _ I v 9 0 4' 8' l6' SCALE: 1/4".1'-0' MIRAMAR CENTER PHASE I I W.hni, Fladde OWNER FECR, Inc ,aosgrnrrawa audio Miami, norido C.S.C. PROJECT NUMBER 2727 O'WNER'S PROJECT NUMBER ISSUED FOR: W" USE VEM PSM TYPE OF DOCS: SCHEMATICS DRAWN APPROVED F.D. 6u DATE STYLE: 10/20/00 AS SHOWN 4066 MIN 97%AV9M Ed6l FLORDA 8706 7EL 8069640715 URBAN RESOURCE GROUP . 4.,..r,. 4r 4i.1t1e4.. ,.1 ,1144i.1t1 �r4 IIBIW 6 DmW"T AAMMMO LAM ISOPE ARN ECTUB SITE OUFMM 4NMW4U10A4ORm mfA9tl mm SEAL/SIGNATURE This drawing is the Property of The Comodino Group old i not to be *PP-duced ar aoopied ' mole ar Part. R is .. tae be used on any tomer proje t d 's to 6e returned request. SHEET TITLE (PHASE 1) TYPICAL UNRS BOOR PLAN SHEET NUMBER A-208 SMOGTI SMOOTH STUCCO FINISH GLASS WINDOW W/ ALUM. FRAME (TYP.) DECORATIVE METAL GRILL (TYP.) METAL DOOR ONORTH WEST ELEVATION 0 16' 32' 64• O SOUTH EAST ELEVATION scWE: t/16•,1._0. 0 16' 32' 64' ROOF- RECREATIONAL DECK 6 ELEV. + 86'-10• INSTITUTION- 7TH FLOOR ri ELEV. + 71•-10- -__ INSTITUTION- STH FLOOR ELEV. + 56'-10• INSTITUTION- 5TH FLOOR ELEV. + 45•-10- oil ELEV. + 32'-10• PARKING- 3RD FLOOR ELEV. + 24'-4• PARKING- 2ND FLOOR'-_, ELEV. + 15'-0- _LOBBY-_ 1ST FLOOR _ ELEV. 0' -0 - AN ,., , ■, u_ uuuu , 1 ■, , ■, P MINIM Elwin ■I■1■ MINIM MINIM dIi'III �1111i ■ HIO 0�11■Elm �ll��l■I���11■■II���I�1■Milo ■iiI'M ■ffiii■ 0-1-1■ MIEW■11!■10 � irlium ins SMOOTH STUCCO FINISH GLASS WINDOW W/ ALUM. FRAME (TYP.) DECORATIVE METAL GRILL (TYP.) METAL DOOR ONORTH WEST ELEVATION 0 16' 32' 64• O SOUTH EAST ELEVATION scWE: t/16•,1._0. 0 16' 32' 64' ROOF- RECREATIONAL DECK 6 ELEV. + 86'-10• INSTITUTION- 7TH FLOOR ri ELEV. + 71•-10- -__ INSTITUTION- STH FLOOR ELEV. + 56'-10• INSTITUTION- 5TH FLOOR ELEV. + 45•-10- __INSTITUTION- 4RD FLOOR ELEV. + 32'-10• PARKING- 3RD FLOOR ELEV. + 24'-4• PARKING- 2ND FLOOR'-_, ELEV. + 15'-0- _LOBBY-_ 1ST FLOOR _ ELEV. 0' -0 - OSOUTH WEST ELEVATION 0 16' 32' 64' STUCCO FINISH IINDOW A. FRAME (TYP.) AILINGS NE METAL YP.) MIRAMAR CENTER PHASE I I Miami, Florida OWNER FECR, Inc too seYpNl. eAd 1111111111100 Miami. Florida C.S.C. PROJECT NUMBER 2727 OWNER'S PROJECT NUMBER ISSUED FOR: KA" WE VEM PEW p^TYPPEE 'O,F •DOCS^:c SCHEMATICS DRAWN APPROVED W 7PF DATE SCALE: 10/20/00 AS SHOWN 6 71 1 A a on /066W WF AVENA MAK FLOHDA 33n TEL 700Kff SS URBAN RESOURCE CROUP IIISM W CEWLOPIIDII PLANK LIIOY.IPE JROPTECRK 96 (RAM 0^Mfa-AAI a mil 11MFl Yi SEAL/SIGNATURE This drawing i the property of The Comadino is and is not to be reproduced o pied In whole or In port. It is conot to be used o .,other project and is to be elumed on request. SHEET TITLE PiAM 1) BULDW ELEVATIONS SHEET NUMBER A-3.06 PLANTER ■1��I71�i��i1 101mi Mll Elmoll I■'®�■'-■" it 1111�11�� Mimi 801 FLOOR TERRACE SCALE: N 0 16' 32' 64• ROOF— RECREATIONAL DECK ELEV. + B6'-10' /, MIRAMAR CENTER PHASE I I Miami. Florida OWNER FECR, Inc ,aosg nr»ewa "1100 Miami. TTorido C.S.C. PROTECT NUMBER 2727 OWNER'S PROJECT NUMBER ISSUED FOR: ""Q USE SPEM PEW TYPE OF DOCS: SCHEMATICS DRAWN APPROVED rD ,vr DATE SCALE: 10/20/00 AS SHOWN 4656 NN IM AVON MAK FLOFM SM TE4 30LO M URBAN RESOURCE GROUP 1 II111111 .1 tl ll[H111 .1. 1111i1111t 111. LIM t OEI WOT RAN" LANDSCAPE 41011911AE STE OIAPIELS •^�ori Y Iw IMUMM-0m ------------ INSTRUTION_- 7TH FLOOR ELEV. + 71'-10"— $ ------____-- INSTITUTION- 6TH -FLOOR ELEV. + 58'-1 ------- --INSTITUTION_-5TH FLOOR ELEV. + 45'-12' A �� SEAL/SIGNATURE ----------- INSTITUTION _ 4R0 FLOOR ELEV. + 32'-10- h '10 ------------ PARKING- 3RD FLOOR ELEV. + 24's' ------------ PARKING_ 2ND FLOOR ELEV. + 15'_0"_ h" LOBBY- 15T FLOOR ----"-------------------- ELEV. 0_-0� — S� This dro.iny is the property of The Corroding Group and is not to tro reprotluce0 or coded in � hoh or m part. It I. n tato be 6( Weed on any tahaer pmi.ci d Is r 1,17d ,1 t6 to be return request. -Fa /ase ^ss�� "'� (lb swET TITLE ^�+P(' 11-11---f J'� vGJ'e / �1/0 l✓NWfg : SASE 1) O SECTION>� SCALE; 0 16' 32' 1. y SHEET NUMBER A-3.05 I 1 / MIRAMAR CENTER PHASE I I Miomi, R.Q. OWNER FECR, Inc T00s. m"maw'sb5100 Miami, EloriIlo C.S.C. PROJECT NUMBER 2727 OWNER'S PROJECT NUMBER ISSUEO NR: VAM USE SPEM PBW TYPE OF DOCS: SCHEMATICS 4th FLOOR INSTITUTIONADRUM L"PP"°4° SCALE: 1/16'•1' 0' 1P� 0 16' 32' 6t' DATE SCALE: N 10/20/00 AS SHOWN •"•E • 4056 FIW 172E AVEN E MAA FLOROA 301 TFi 50L%40 dS URBAN RESOURCE CROUP 6IBUI 5 RYE mol FLMW UNWAE M10111RTA SR 0M01RS r--------------------� a...o......40 ....o. r°a I 1 Loom I t t 1 , I I I I I I I I I I SEAL/SIGNATURE INSTITUTIONAL 19.860 S.F. s¢ CTne Ca saa�„o c o o �a =Tdy at Public tow . Moa -«a Pipe rd nob or Port. Il is l to M �` •- to b on any ot�ar "-,t and (`�3�S!1 'I `►a/i► to d , ., repueat. 1€w F SHEET TOLE fi (PHASE 1) 5th FLOOR INSTITUTIONAL SCALE: �' 4t ��rT-ZVML 1/16'=I'-0' N 0 16' 32' 64' 01 i 199 99 SHEET NUMBER A-3.03 OSECTION DETAIL 0 8' 16' 32' 11TH FLOOR - REC. DECK ELEV. + 89'-8" PARKING _--10TH -------- FLOOR ELEV. + 81'-6" PARKING 9TH FLOOR ELEV. + 73'-4" PARKING - -------------------------- 8TH FLOOR ELEV. + 65'-2" RATIVE METAL (TMP.) PARKING - -------------------- 7TH FLOOR ELEV. + 57'-0" PARKING - -------------------------- 6TH FLOOR ELEV. + 48'-10" FINS PARKING - 5TH FLOOR A ELEV. + 40'-8" -------------------------- PARKING - 4RD FLOOR ELEV. + 32'-6" PLANTER PARKING - 3RD FLOORELEV. + 24'-4" PARKING - 2ND FLOOR ELEV. + 15'-0" CANOPY -------------------------- WINDOW _UM. FRAME (TYP.) RESTAURANT- 1ST FLOOR ------------------------ NOTE: ELEV. HEIGHT 0'-O"= N.G.V.D. 6'-0" ELEV. 0'-0" 2 ELEVATION DETAIL 0 8' 16' SMOOTH STUCCO FINISH DECORATIVE METAL GRILL (TYP.) METAL FINS METAL CANOPY GLASS WINDOW W/ ALUM. FRAME (TYP.) Subrr"Wed6r. r®� in c!! ® bli ►'Nott on 7 SCALE: t/6••1'-0• -rnln 32' % c 01 199 MIRAMAR CENTER PHASE I I Miami. %ido OWNER FECR, Inc 100SBYarrBhd b1100 Miami. Florido C.S.C. PROJECT NUMBER 2727 OWNER'S PROJECT NUMBER ISSUED FOR: VAM USE TYPE OF DOCS: SCHEMATICS DRAWN APPROVED W T►P DATE SCALE: 10/20/00 AS SHOWN MA1l Fl01DA 5706 TM 30SM40M URBAN RESOURCE CROUP IJBW1 It OEVELOPIDT KNOW lMOSCME AROVECAME SHE 01JP17tS o^� iMw� �o rrrAa �+NM SEAL/SIGNATURE This droning is the property of The Coh,adino Group and is not to be reproduced or copied m .hole o part. It is not to be sed an any the, pn;.at and is to be returned rpuefl. SHEET TITLE BUILDING 11) BUILDING SECTION ELEVATION SHEET NUMBER A-2.12 SECOND FLOOR PARKING 0 16' 32' Ba' N record into the o in con,. R+iblic f 2 on ctjcc With THIRD FLOOR PARKING 6(�S�CA cityV 0 16' 32' .L 19 9 N .L MIRAMAR CENTER PHASE II Miami, Fe.ide OWNER FECR, Inc ,00st.swd sur„ao Miami. Florida C.S.C. PROJECT NUMBER 2727 OWNER'S PROJECT NUMBER ISSUED FOR,. MAIOR USE VEMFBW TYPE OF DOCS: SCHEMATICS DRAWN APPROVED FD ,.. DATE SCALE: 10/20/00 AS SHOWN AM W WIh AMS&IE MAK R.QFM =N M 00SM4MU URBAN RESOURCE 1111/111GROUP 1 11111111 11 1111[NI11 111 11Ilt UIBAN t OEVORMEPT RAWK AIMIEC'm SITE awls 6 OtNCW�� •7Y IRII f/Olf� p� SEAL/SIGNATURE This drawing is the proper' of The Corrodlno Creep nd i not to be repredueed or copied f hole o port. It is n at to be .sed o any other Vojeaf d is to be elomW repoe.t. SHEET TITLE (PHASE 1) SECOND,THHD FLOOR PAWING SHEET NUMBER A-3.02 CORRADINO -TOP OF MECH. PENTHOUSE A ELEV + 529'-B" ,Q ROOF ELEV. + 481'-8" _ _ _ _ - -56TH MOR -_ APARTMENTS A ELEV. + 471'-0" _55TH FLOOR = APARTMENTS_A ELEV + 462'-4" -541`14 FLOOR _MARTMENTS _ A ELEV. + 453'-8" Y ----- _53RD fLQOR - APARTMENTSEL�- _521fID FLDOR -_ APARTMENTS ELEV. + 436'-4"- -S151 fLO01 _APARTMENTS ELEV. + 427'-8" ----- _50TH FLOOR _ APARTMENTS AY ELEV. + 419'-0" _ _ _ _ _ _49TH FLOOR 7- MARTMENTS ,fS ELEV_+ !10'-1" - - - _ - _48TN FLOOR -_ APARTMENTS ELEV. + !01-8" _tWH FLQOR _ APARTMENTS A ELEV. + 393'-0" - - -46TN ELOOR - MARTMENTS ELEV. + 384'-4" -l57H FLOOR - APARTMENTSELEV�j'-2'.._ _ _ - - - _447H FLOOR _ APARTMENTS _ ,A ELEV. ++ 367'-0" —43RD FLOOR _ APARTMENTS ELEV. + 358'-t" -t2N0 FLOOR - MARTMENTS ELEV. + 349'-8" _ _ _ _ _ _41ST FLOOR _ APARTMENTS ELEV. + 341'-0" _ - _ _ _ 40TH FLOOR - MARTMENTS A ELEV. + 332'-4" _39TH ELOOR -_ MARTMENTSELEV. + 323'-8" - - - - - _38TH FLOOR _ MARTMENTS ,LI ELEV. + 315'-0" - _ _ _ _ -37TH FLOOR - APARTMENTS A ELEV. + 306'-!" -36TH FLOOR - MARTMENTS A ELEV. + 297'-B" _35TH FLOOR Z. APARTMENTS ,l ELEV. + 289'-0" _34TH FLOOR _ MARTMENTS - ,l ELEV. + 280'-4" _3310 FLOOR - MARTMENTS AYELEV. + 271'-8' _32ND FLOOR _ MARTIENTS ,{I ELEV. + 263-O- _31ST 5OOR _ APARTMENTS A ELEV. + 254'-4" -XTEL bOD(L - APARTMENTSELEV+ _ 2{5'-8. _ - _ _ _ _ _29TH ELOOR _ MARTMENTS 0 ELEV. + 237'-0"237'-0" _ _ _ _ _ _28TH a291 - MARTMENTS _ A ELEV. + 228'-4' _27TH FLOOR - MARTMENTS ELEV. + 219'-8" -26TH FLOOR _ MARTMENTS 4 ELEV. + 21 1'-0" - - _ _ _ -25TH FLOOR _ APARTMENT$ A ELEV. + 201'-10- _24TH ELOOR -_ MARTMENTS ELEV. + 193'-B" - - - - - _23RD FLOOR -_ MARTMENTS ELEV. + 185'-0" - - _ _ _ _22ND FLOOR MARTMENTS E + 176'-4" _21ST FLOOR _ MARTMENTS 'Fl ELEV. + 167'-8" -20TH fLDOR - MARTMENTS A ELEV. + 159'-0" 19TH FLOOR - MARTMENTS ELEV. + 150'-4" -18TH FLOOR _ MARTMENTS ELEV. + 141'-8" _ _ _ _ _ _ 17TH FLOOR - MARTMENTS A ELEV. 133'-0" -16TH FLOOR - MARTMENTS _ ,LELEV. + 124'-4' -15TH ELOOR _ MARTMENTS _A ELEV. + 115'-8" ----- -14TH FLOOR 7- STUDIO EL_ ELEV. + 107'-0" _ _ _ _ _ _ 127H ELWl - STUDIO fl-_ 0 ELEV. + 98'-4" 11TH ELOOR - AEC. DECK A ELEV. 89'-8" -PARKING_ - _ 10TH FLOOR 0 ELEV. + 81'-6" _ _ _ _ - _ PARKING= _ - 9TH_ FLOOR _ 0 ELEV. + 73'-4" - - - - - -PARKING=_ _ 8THFLELEV.+ 65'-2" _ _ _ _ _ PARKING - 7TH ELOOR A ELEV. + 57'-0" -PARKING - 6TH ELOOR 4 ELEV. + 48'-10" _PARKING_ _ _ 5TH FLOOR _ A ELEV. + 40'-8" _PARKING= __ 4RD FLOOR �y ELEV. + 32'-6" -PARKING_ - 3R0 FLOOR A ELEV. + 24'-4" _PARKING - 02FLOOR A ELEV. + 15'-0" _LOBgI_ - - _ 15T FLOOR A ELEV. 0'-0" OSOUTH ELEVATION 0" 10' XI' 60' 120' Suhhd tnte rOc Ord in cc, the Public IT Cnn;mv h Q WalterFoem.an 01- 19 ' MIRAMAR CENTER PHASE I I Miami, Florida OWNER FECR, Inc Miami, Florida C.S.C. PROTECT NUMBER 2727 OWNER'S PROJECT NUMBER ISSUED FOR: VAJOR USE SPECIALPEW �/TTYLP�EE OFF DOCS: .TME MIIW DRAWN MPROYM 6B iR DATE SCALE: 10/20/00 AS SHOWN 485 MN N761 AMOM MAK FLONDA 3306 TFL 606940765 URBAN RESOURCE CROUP r Iintlu If In IIN.0 u1 011tultt ILL U1801 A OE1fLw14111 A)ANID L#47MESIE �� RAE ft4 MWOS WAR eil mWWRt�7 SEAL/SDATURE This drawing is the property of The C—dine Group and inot to be roprod—d or copied hole or in part. It N t to be used on anyTher projeot and u to W wumed on request. SHEET TITLE "WE 1) BUILDING 4 ELEVATION SHEET MMBER A-2fl O EAST ELEVATION SEPTET/30"•i'-0" 0" 10' 30' 60' 120' --------- TOP OF !ECH_PENTMWSE ELEV. + 529'-8" .-------_- ROOf---------ELEV. + 481•-8" .--------- StTt FLOOR _APARTMENTS ELEV. + 471'-0" 55TH FLOOR _APARTMENTS A ELEV. + 462'-4" --------- S47X FLOOR _APARTMENTS ELEV. + 453'-8" -----. ---------53RD aWt _APARTMENTS _ ,I, ELEV. + 445'-0" - - - - - - - - - 520D ROOK.- APARTMENTS A ELEV. + 436'-4' --------- MISL FLOOR _APARTMENTS AELEV. + 427' -8" ---------50TH FLOOR _APARTMENTS AELEV. + 419'-0" - - - - - - - - - 4TH aQQIL- APARTMENTS ELEV. + 410'-4" -- �BTH FLOOR =APARTMENTS ELEV. + 401'-8" - - - - - - -----�- 47TX DOOR _ APARTMENTS ELEV. + 393'-0" - - - - - - _ --------- 46TX FLOOR _APARTMENTS AELEV. + 384'-4' ------ --------- --4Yt UQ21 _APARTMENTS ELEV + 375'-2 -----_ ----- - - - - - - - - - 21-IRL 5WIL _ APARTmLN15 ELEV. + 367' -0" ---------23RD 509 _APARTMENTS AELEV. + 358'-4" --------- 2INk BOOR M_ APARTMENTS 0ELEV. + 349'-8" - - - - - - - - - 5 -IsL FLOOR =APARTMENTS 0 ELEV. + 341'-0 -----. --------- 40TH FLQOft _APARTMENTS 0 ELEV. + 332'-4' --------- J9TN FLOOR _APARTMENTS AELEV. + 323'-8" --------- 38TX ELOOR _APARTMENTS AELEV. + 315'-0" --------- 37TH FLOOR _APARTMENTS ELEV. + 306'-4" --------- AGWRL Mgt _APARMENTS- 0ELEV. + 297'-8" --------- A5-TtL UWI _APARTMENTS 0 ELEV. + 289'-0 ----__ --------- 34TH ELOOR _APARTUENTS ,L ELEV. + 280'-4" ------_ --------- jjRL LLQOL _APARTMENTS -0 ELEV. + 271'-8" ------ - - - - - - - - - 3210 FLOOR _APARTMENTS AELEV. i 263'-0" --------- -3 -IST FLOOR _APARTMENTS 0 ELEV. + 254'-4" --------- IWtL ELQDR.=APARTMENTS 0 ELEV. + 245'-8" — — — — — — — — — 2VtL FLOOR_ APARTNEfUTS A ELEV. + 237'-0" --------- -2$TtL FLOOR =APARTMENTS _,ELEV. + 228'-4" — — — — — — — — — ?Z!tL FLOOR _ APARTMENTS Y ELEV. + 219'-8" --------- ?-6TtL 5WI _APARTMENTS ,L ELEV + 211'-0" ------_ — — — — — — — — — ?yt FLOOR _ APARTMENTS _ -ELEV. + 201'-10" — — — — — — — — — 24TH _FLOOR — APARTMENTS ,L ELEV. + 793-8" — — _ — — — —_------- 23RD ELOOR _APARTMENTS ELEV. + 785'-0 -----_ --------- 2211D FLITOR _APARTMENTS AELEV + 176'-4" --------- 2TISL FLOOR _APARTMENTS AELEV. + 167'-8" --------- KOTt FLDOR _APARTMENTS ELEV + 159'-0" ----- I -----_ — — — — — — — — — —1!TtL FLOOR _ APARTMENTS AELEV. + 150'-4" ---------j !RL FLOOR _ APARTMENTS 0 ELEV. + 141'-8" ------_ jftL FLOOR - APARTMENTS A ELEV. ♦ 133'-0" — — — — — — — — — - j!TtL FLOOR =APARTMENTS 0ELEV. + 124'-4' 1$TN FLOOR - APARTMENTS A ELEV. + 115'-8" ----------1 STH ROOK _STUDIO FL_ AELEV. + 107'-0" 12TH FLOOR - STUDIO FL. ELEV. + 98'-4" — -8" ------ 'AP _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ t 7TH PIOOR— _REC. DECK 'F7 ELEV. + 89' ,_-------- PARKING ---10TH FLOOR 10 ELEV. + 81'-6" -----_ --------- PARKING ___9THFLOOR-ELEV. + 73'-4' ------ --------- PARKING_ — —BTM FLOOR—ELEV. + 65'-2" --------- 2LRLING_--7TH FLOOR— ,L ELEV. + 57'-0" ------ --------- 2LRISINE---6TH FLOOR— AELEV. + 48'-10" --- PARKING=— —S?H FLOOR— AELEV. + 40'-8" ------_--26RKING---4RD FLOOR— ,L ELEV. + 32'-6" ------ --------- PARKING_— —SRU FLOOR—_',LV ELEV. + 24'-4" PARKING - 2ND FLOOR _'A. ELEV. + 15'-0" LOBS ----IST FIGO_ R ELEV. 0'-0• OWEST ELEVATION 0" 10' JO' 60' 120' — rre -4 Sub b9d into N Public rOcOrd in py�q�$ar �11�) � ^{PAY W&fir Fpeman of- 199 MIRAMAR CENTER PHASE II Mromi, Ronda OWNER FECR, Inc ,999BfIpyeDBMd s1A11100 Miami, Florida C.S.C. PROJECT NUMBER 2727 OWNER'S PROJECT NUMBER ISSUED FOR. VAM 119E 'EM PERK c^TYLP�EC,O.F•DOOCCS^:c SCHEMATICS DRAWN APPROVED a 7FP DATE SCALE: 10/20/00 AS SHOWN 4066 NM QD7 AVE" N" FLORIDA 0606 7m 906811407!5 URBAN RESOURCE CROUP irI111r II I�rl[Nlrl Jr1 Is iltlrr[t irL UIBN7 t DE`G.OploT FLMAWC LMDWA% AOIECRRF SITE GRAM eusauloJWRfs1M Mwmmim00 SEAL/SIGNATURE This droeing is the property of The Carrodino Greupa and is nort to be r produced r pied i chole « port. II is not to be .sedto be omturrnany ed a,therequjertt a d is SHEET TITLE (PHASE 1) ELEVATIONS SHEET NUMBER A-210