Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
R-02-1249
J-02-965SE 11/19/02 RESOLUTION NO. 02-1249 A RESOLUTION OF THE MIAMI CITY COMMISSION, WITH ATTACHMENTS, APPROVING WITH CONDITIONS A SUBSTANTIAL MODIFICATION TO RESOLUTION NO. 98-1151, A MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT PURSUANT TO ARTICLES 13, 17 AND 22 OF ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 11000, FOR THE ONE MIAMI PARCELS "B", "C" AND "D" PROJECT, TO BE LOCATED BETWEEN SOUTHEAST 2ND AND 4TH STREETS AND BETWEEN SOUTHEAST 2ND AVENUE AND BISCAYNE BOULEVARD, MIAMI, FLORIDA; APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT ORDER; DIRECTING TRANSMITTAL OF THIS RESOLUTION; MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATING CONCLUSIONS OF LAW; PROVIDING FOR BINDING EFFECT; CONTAINING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, on November 17, 1998, the City Commission approved Resolution No. 98-1151, which approved a Master Development Program for the property located between Southeast 2nd and 4 t Streets and Southeast 2nd Avenue and Biscayne Boulevard, Miami, Florida; and WHEREAS, on September 6, 2002, Ricardo Glas, Trustee, and Miami One Centre, LP., (hereinafter referred to as the "APPLICANT"), submitted a complete application for a substantial modification to Resolution No. 98-1151, a Major Use Special Permit for the One Miami- Parcels "B", "C", and "D" Project CITY C030UM0N blErrmG OF NOV 1 9 2002 Rewakifign R. 02-1249 pursuant to Article 13, 17 and 22 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended, (the "Zoning Ordinance") to approve a specific project (hereinafter referred to as the "PROJECT") for the property located between Southeast 2nd and 4th Streets and between Southeast 2nd Avenue and Biscayne Boulevard, Miami, Florida, as legally described in "Exhibit "B;" and WHEREAS, development of the PROJECT requires the issuance of a Substantial Modification to a Major Use Special Permit pursuant to Articles 13, 17 and 22 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended; and WHEREAS, the Large Scale Development Committee met on August 12, 2002, to consider the proposed PROJECT and offer its input; and WHEREAS, the APPLICANT has modified the proposed PROJECT to address the expressed technical concerns raised at that Large Scale Development Committee meeting; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Department reviewed the project for design appropriateness throughout the pre - application phase and, upon modifications in the final design proposal, recommended approval of the final design solution to the Planning and Zoning Director; and Page 2 of 10 02-1249 WHEREAS, the Urban Development Review Board met on August 27, 2002, to consider the proposed PROJECT and recommended denial of the PROJECT based on concerns over potential traffic congestion in the area, not based on how the project meets the public realm; and WHEREAS, the Miami Planning Advisory Board, at its meeting held on October 16, 2002, Item No. 12, following an advertised public hearing, adopted Resolution No. PAB 70-02 by a vote of seven to zero (7-0), RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of the Substantial Modification to the Major Use Special Permit Development Order as attached and incorporated; and WHEREAS, the City Commission deems it advisable and in the best interest of the general welfare of the City of Miami to issue a Substantial Modification to a Major Use Special Permit Development Order as hereinafter set forth; and WHEREAS, the Miami Historic and Environmental Preservation Board, at its meeting held on November 19, 2002, following an advertised public hearing, adopted Resolution No. HEPB-2002-68 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of the application for a Certificate of Appropriateness for ground disturbing activity subject to certain conditions; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA: Page 3 of 10 02-1249 Section 1. The recitals and findings contained in the Preamble to this Resolution are adopted by reference and incorporated as if fully set forth in this Section. Section 2. A Substantial Modification to a Major Use Special Permit Development Order, attached and incorporated as Exhibit "A", is approved subject to the conditions specified in the Development Order, per Article 17 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, for the PROJECT to be developed by the APPLICANT, at Southeast 2nd and 4th Streets and Southeast 2nd Avenue and Biscayne Boulevard, Miami, Florida, more particularly described in Exhibit "B" attached and incorporated. Section 3. The PROJECT is approved as a phased development. Section 4. The Development Program approved pursuant to Resolution No. 98-1151 (on file at the Office of the City Clerk) is amended to reflect the subtraction of the specific development program being approved for Parcels "B", "Cl', and "D" herein, as follows: Page 4 of 10 02_1249 Section 5. The Substantial Modification to the Major Use Special Permit Application for the PROJECT also encompasses the lower ranking Special Permits as set forth in the Development Order (Exhibit "A"). Section 6. The retail/entertainment center located at the Northeast corner of Southeast 4th Street and Southeast 3rd Avenue is hereby designated a "retail and specialty center." Section 7. The findings of fact set forth below are made with respect to the subject PROJECT: 1� Conversion of 250,000 sq. ft. of office to residential as follows: (250,000)(.0044)= 1,100 units using the same coefficients for conversion approved in the Area Wide Downtown Miami Development of Regional Impact, which this property is a part thereof. 21 Conversion of 250,000 sq. ft. of office to residential as follows: (250,000)(.0044)= 1,100 units using the same coefficients for conversion approved in the Area Wide Downtown Miami Development of Regional Impact, which this property is a part thereof. Page 5 of 10 02-1249 Approved Approved Requested for Use Pursuant Pursuant Parcels Balance To To "B", "C" and Resolution Resolution "D" 98-1151 No. 02-858 Office 1,200,000 28,000 9,0001 913,000 sq. ft. Retail 400,000 17,000 218,625 164,375 sq. ft. Residential 1,500 900 1,5002 units 200 Hotel 0 0 300 rooms 300 Section 5. The Substantial Modification to the Major Use Special Permit Application for the PROJECT also encompasses the lower ranking Special Permits as set forth in the Development Order (Exhibit "A"). Section 6. The retail/entertainment center located at the Northeast corner of Southeast 4th Street and Southeast 3rd Avenue is hereby designated a "retail and specialty center." Section 7. The findings of fact set forth below are made with respect to the subject PROJECT: 1� Conversion of 250,000 sq. ft. of office to residential as follows: (250,000)(.0044)= 1,100 units using the same coefficients for conversion approved in the Area Wide Downtown Miami Development of Regional Impact, which this property is a part thereof. 21 Conversion of 250,000 sq. ft. of office to residential as follows: (250,000)(.0044)= 1,100 units using the same coefficients for conversion approved in the Area Wide Downtown Miami Development of Regional Impact, which this property is a part thereof. Page 5 of 10 02-1249 a. The PROJECT is in conformity with the adopted Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000, as amended. b. The PROJECT is in accord with the CBD (Central Business District) Zoning classifications of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended. C. Pursuant to Section 1305 of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, the specific site plan aspects of the PROJECT, i.e., ingress and egress, parking, sign and lighting, utilities, drainage, preservation of natural features and control of potentially adverse effects generally, have been considered and will be further considered administratively during the process of issuing a building permit and a certificate of occupancy. d. The PROJECT is expected to cost approximately $428,366,216 and to employ approximately 915 workers during construction; the PROJECT will also result in the creation of approximately 470 permanent new jobs. The PROJECT will generate approximately $9,952,832 annually in tax revenues to local units of government (2002 dollars). Page 6 of 10 02-1249 e. f. The PROJECT and the proposed conversion of uses is in conformity and consistent with the Area Wide Downtown Miami Development of Regional Impact. The City Commission further finds that: (1) the PROJECT will have a favorable impact on the economy of the City; (2) the PROJECT will efficiently use public transportation facilities; (3) any potentially adverse effects of the PROJECT will be mitigated through compliance with the conditions of this Major Use Special Permit; (4) the PROJECT will favorably affect the need for people to find adequate housing reasonably accessible to their places of employment; (5) the PROJECT will efficiently use necessary public facilities; (6) the PROJECT will not negatively impact the environment and natural resources of the City; (7) the PROJECT will not adversely affect living conditions in the neighborhood; (8) the PROJECT will not adversely affect public safety; Page 7 of 10 U2 -x.249 (9) based on the record presented and evidence presented, the public welfare will be served by the PROJECT; and (10) any potentially adverse effects of the PROJECT arising from safety and security, fire protection and life safety, solid waste, heritage conservation, trees, minority participation and employment, and minority contractor/ subcontractor participation will be mitigated through compliance with the conditions of this Major Use Special Permit. Section 8. The Substantial Modification to the Major Use Special Permit, as approved and amended, shall be binding upon the APPLICANT and any successors in interest. Section 9. The application for a Substantial Modification to the Major Use Special Permit, which was submitted on September 6, 2002, and is on file with the Department of Planning and Zoning of the City of Miami, Florida, shall be relied upon generally for administrative interpretations and is incorporated by reference. Section 10. The City Manager is directed to instruct the Director of the Department of Planning and Zoning to transmit a copy of this Resolution and attachment to the developers: Page 8 of 10 02-1249 Gilberto Pastoriza, Esq., on behalf of Ricardo Glas, Trustee, and Miami One Centre, LP, 2665 South Bayshore Drive, Suite 420, Miami, Florida 33133. Section 11. The Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law are made with respect to the PROJECT as described in the Development Order (Exhibit "A") for the PROJECT, attached and incorporated. Section 12. In the event that any portion or section of this Resolution or the Development Order (Exhibit "A") is determined to be invalid, illegal, or unconstitutional by a court or agency of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall in no manner affect the remaining portions of this Resolution or Development Order (Exhibit "A"), which shall remain in full force and effect. Section 13. The provisions in this Substantial Modification to the Major Use Special Permit, as approved, shall commence and become operative thirty (30) days after the adoption of this Resolution. Section 14. This Substantial Modification to the Major Use Special Permit, as approved, shall expire two (2) years from its commencement and operative date. Page 9 of 10 02-1249 Section 15. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its adoption and signature of the Mayor.!' PASSED AND ADOPTED this 19th day of November ATTEST: C LLA A. WOMKON ,;,4' CITY CLERK APPROVED 95SE:GKW:et:BSS or ad ORRECTNESS: 2002. i MANUEL A DIAZ, MAYOR 3/ If the Mayor does not sign this Resolution, it shall become effective at the end of ten calendar days from the date it was passed and adopted. If the Mayor vetoes this Resolution, it shall become effective immediately upon override of the veto by the City Commission. Page 10 of 10 02-1249 "EXHIBIT A" ATTACHMENT TO RESOLUTION NO. _ DATE: , 2002 ONE MIAMI PARCELS B, C AND D PROJECT MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT DEVELOPMENT ORDER Let it be known that pursuant to Articles 13, 17 and 22 of Ordinance NO. 11000, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended (the `Zoning Ordinance"), the Miami City Commission in Miami -Dade County, Florida, has considered in a public hearing, the issuance of a Substantial Modification to a Major Use Special Permit for the One Miami Parcels B, C, and D Project (hereinafter referred to as the "PROJECT") to be located between SE 2nd and 4th Streets and between SE 2nd Avenue and Biscayne Boulevard, Miami, Florida (see legal description in "Exhibit B", attached and incorporated). The Project is subject to any dedications, limitations, restrictions, reservations or easements of record. After due consideration of the recommendations of the Planning Advisory Board and after due consideration of the consistency of this proposed development with the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan, the City Commission has 02-1249 approved the PROJECT, and subject to the following conditions approves the Major Use Special Permit and issues this Permit: FINDINGS OF FACT PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The proposed PROJECT is a residential/mixed use development to be located between SE 2nd and 4th Streets and between SE 2nd Avenue and Biscayne Boulevard, Miami, Florida. The PROJECT is located on a gross lot area of approximately 9.32 acres and a net lot area of approximately 5.94 acres of land (more specifically described in "Exhibit B," incorporated herein by reference). The remainder of the PROJECT's Data Sheet is attached and incorporated as "Exhibit "C." The proposed PROJECT will consist of a mixed use residential/commercial development on three City blocks, with no more than 1,500 residential units with accessory recreational space, approximately 218,625 square feet of retail/entertainment uses and approximately 9,000 square feet of office uses. The PROJECT will also provide approximately 4,284 parking spaces. The ownership, operation and maintenance of common areas and facilities will be by the property owner or (in the case of the property being converted to condominiums) a mandatory A-2 of 11 02-1249 property owner association in perpetuity pursuant to a recorded Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions. The Major Use Special Permit Application for the PROJECT also encompasses the following lower ranking Special Permits and approvals: CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Section 915.2 for FAA clearance letter. CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 925.3.8, to allow development/construction/rental signage. CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 918.2 for parking and staging of construction during construction. CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 920.1, to allow a trailer and watchman's quarters for construction and other temporary office uses such as leasing and sales. CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 922.4(c) to allow maneuvering of trucks on public rights of way. CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 906.6, for pool/outdoor recreation area. CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 917.1.2 to allow valet parking for residential and other uses. CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 906.9 to allow for a special event, namely a ground breaking ceremony. CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 4, Section 401 to allow for bars, saloons, taverns and/or supper clubs. CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 4, Section 401 to allow for child day care facilities. CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 917.1.1 to allow backing into a street. A-3 of 11 0_1249 CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 4, Section 401, for development of new construction within the Central Business District. CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 908.2 for access from a public street roadway width greater than 25 feet. CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 4, Section 401 to approve open space and/or residential recreation space as shown on the plans. CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 4, Section 401 to allow for wholesale activities at the ground floor level along designated primary pedestrian pathways so long as ground floor frontage consists of a retail or open to the public component. CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 4, Section 401 to allow for parking garages. CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 4, Section 401 to allow for outdoor eating areas, outdoor cafes, outdoor display and sale of food or live flowers and plants. CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 922.8 to allow for combined off-street loading facilities. CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 903.1 to allow development of a project divided by a street. CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT, as per Article 4, Section 401, for a temporary construction fence and covered walkway within the Central Business District. MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT, per Article 17, Section 1701, and Article 22 of City of Miami Zoning Ordinance 11000, as amended, to allow a change in the original application (substantial modification for previously approved Resolution No. 98-1151) from 383,000 square feet (as modified by Resolution No. 02-858) of nonresidential floor area to approximately 227,625 square feet. MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT, per Article 17, Section 1701, and Article 22 of City of Miami Zoning Ordinance 11000, as amended, to allow a change in the original application (substantial modification for previously approved Resolution No. 98-1151) A-4 of 11 o2-1249 from parking structures consisting of 5,815 spaces (as modified by Resolution No. 02-858) to approximately 4,284 spaces. MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT, per Article 17, Section 1701, and Article 22 of City of Miami Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, as amended, to allow a change in the original application (substantial modification for previously approved Resolution No. 98-1151) to convert 250,000 square feet of office use to residential use using the same co -efficient as those in Increment I of the Downtown Miami Development of Regional Impact. (250,000) x (.0044) = 1,100 units Prior to above conversion, 1,172,000 square feet (Resolution No. 98-1151 as modified by Resolution No. 02-858) of office was available. After the conversion 1,022,000 square feet is still available. Prior to above conversion, 600 residential units (Resolution No. 98-1151 as modified by Resolution No. 02-858) were available. After above conversion, 1,700 units are now available. Fifteen hundred (1,500) units are approved. Request Waiver by City Commission from Chapter 36 of the Miami City Code, the Noise Ordinance, to allow continuous concrete pours while under construction. Designation, per Miami City Code Chapter 4, of the entertainment retail center located at the Northeast corner of Southeast 3rd Avenue and Southeast 4th Street as a retail specialty center, as that term is defined in Section 4-2. Request for a Certificate of Appropriateness, per Miami City Code Chapter 23-5(a), for ground disturbing activity in an Archaeological Conservation Area. Designation as a phased project, pursuant to Section 2502 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, as amended (approved by Resolution No. 98-1151) from parcel A, B, C, D to east half of D first, then B and C, then west half of D. REQUEST that the following MUSP conditions be required at the time of issuance of the Temporary Certificate of Occupancy or Final Certificate of Occupancy (whichever comes first) instead of at the time of the issuance of the foundation permit: A-5 of 11 p2-1249 a. the requirement to record in the Public Records a Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions providing that the ownership, operation and maintenance of all common areas and facilities will be by the property owner or a mandatory property owner association; and b. the requirement to record in the Public Records a unity of title or covenant in lieu of unity of title. Pursuant to Articles 13 and 17 of the Zoning Ordinance, approval of the requested Major Use Special Permit shall be considered sufficient for the subordinate permits requested and referenced above as well as any other special approvals required by the City which may be required to carry out the requested plans. The PROJECT shall be constructed substantially in accordance with plans and design schematics on file prepared by Nichols Brosch Sandoval, dated August 29, 2002; design and landscape plans may be modified only to the extent necessary to comply with the conditions for approval imposed herein; all modifications shall be subject to the review and approval of the Director of the Department of Planning and Zoning prior to the issuance of any building permits. The PROJECT conforms to the requirements of the Central Business District Zoning District, as contained in Ordinance No. 11000, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended. A-6 of 11 02-1249 The existing comprehensive plan future land use designation on the subject property allows the proposed mix of residential, office and commercial uses. CONDITIONS THE APPLICANT, ITS SUCCESSORS, AND/OR ASSIGNS, JOINTLY OR SEVERALLY, PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF ANY BUILDING PERMITS, SHALL COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING: 1. Meet all applicable building codes, land development regulations, ordinances and other laws. 2. Payment of all applicable fees due and owing prior to the issuance of a building permit. 3. Allow the Miami Police Department to conduct a security survey, at the option of the Department, and to make recommendations concerning security measures and systems; further submit a report to the Department of Planning and Zoning, prior to commencement of construction, demonstrating how the Police Department recommendations, if any, have been incorporated into the Project security and construction plans, or demonstrate to the Director of the Department of Planning and Zoning why such recommendations are impractical. 4. Obtain approval from, or provide a letter from the Department of Fire -Rescue indicating Applicant's coordination with members of the Fire Plan Review Section at the Department of Fire -Rescue in the review of the scope of the Project, owner responsibility, building development process and review procedures, as well as specific requirements for fire projection and life safety systems, exiting, vehicular access and water supply. 5. Obtain approval from, or provide a letter of assurance from the Department of Solid Waste that the Project has A-7 of 11 02-1249 addressed all concerns of the said Department prior to the obtainment of a shell permit. 6. Prepare a Minority Participation and Employment Plan (including a Contractor/Subcontractor Participation Plan) to be submitted to the City's Director of Equal Employment Opportunity for review and comments, with the understanding that the Applicant must use its best efforts to follow the provisions of the City's Minority/Women Business Affairs and Procurement Program as a guide. 7. Record the following in the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, prior to the issuance of a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy or Certificate of Occupancy, a Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions providing that the ownership, operation and maintenance of all common areas and facilities will be by the property owner or a mandatory property owner association in perpetuity. 8. Prior to the issuance of a shell permit, demonstrate to the City that the condominium documents have been filed with the State of Florida; or (b) provide the City with an executed, recordable unity of title or covenant in -lieu of unity of title agreement for the subject property; said agreement shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Attorney's Office. 9. Provide the Department of Public Works with plans for proposed sidewalk and swale area improvements (including implementation of the Burle Marx Plan for Biscayne Boulevard) for its review and approval prior to the issuance of a building permit. 10. Provide the Department of Planning and Zoning with a temporary parking plan, including an operational plan, which addresses construction employee parking during the construction period, said plan shall include an enforcement plan and shall be subject to the review and approval by the Department of Planning and Zoning prior to the issuance of any building permits and shall be enforced during construction activity. 11. Pursuant to the Departments of Police, Fire -Rescue and General Services Administration, the roof area of the proposed structures shall be made available to the City of A-8 of 11 02-1`49 Miami for any necessary communications equipment at no charge to the City. 12. If the project is to be developed in phases, the Applicant shall submit an interim plan, including a landscape plan, which addresses design details for the land occupying future phases of this Project in the event that the future phases are not developed, said plan shall include a proposed timetable and shall be subject to review and approval by the Director of the Department of Planning and Zoning. 13. The Applicant shall comply with the "Miami One Archeological Management Plan" prepared by Robert S. Carr, dated October 29, 2002, and amended by Historic and Environmental Preservation Board Resolution No. HEPB 2002-68 on November 19, 2002. The Miami One Archeological Management Plan (attached as Exhibit "D") and HEPB resolution (attached as Exhibit "E") are incorporated herein by reference and are on file with the Planning and Zoning Department. 14. Within 90 days of the effective date of this Development Order, record a certified copy of the Development Order specifying that the Development Order runs with the land and is binding on the Applicant, its successors, and assigns, jointly or severally. 15. Given the significance of the subject properties in the heart of the downtown area, the Applicant shall provide for decorative construction fencing while the project is being built; design of such fencing shall be subject to review and approval by the Director of Planning and Zoning. 16. The Applicant shall continue to work with the Planning and Zoning Department to address design issues related to the Projects' rooftops in order to address concerns associated with the final building elevations and consistency of architectural elements. THE CITY SHALL: A-9 of 11 02--1249 Establish the operative date of this Permit as being thirty (30) days from the date of its issuance; the issuance date shall constitute the commencement of the thirty (30) day period to appeal from the provisions of the Permit. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW The PROJECT, proposed by the APPLICANT, complies with the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000, is consistent with the orderly development and goals of the City of Miami, and complies with local land development regulations. Further, pursuant to Section 1703 of the Zoning Ordinance: (1) the PROJECT will have a favorable impact on the economy of the City; and (2) the PROJECT will efficiently use public transportation facilities; and (3) the PROJECT will favorably affect the need for people to find adequate housing reasonably accessible to their places of employment; and (4) the PROJECT will efficiently use necessary public facilities; and (5) the PROJECT will not negatively impact the environment and natural resources of the City; and (6) the PROJECT will not adversely affect public safety; and A-10 of 11 02-1249 (7) the public welfare will be served by the PROJECT; and (8) any potentially adverse effects of the PROJECT will be mitigated through conditions of this Major Use Special Permit. The proposed development does not unreasonably interfere with the achievement of the objectives of the adopted State Land Development Plan applicable to the City of Miami. Pursuant to Section 1305 of the Zoning Ordinance, the specific site plan aspects of the PROJECT i.e., ingress and egress, offstreet parking and loading, refuse and service areas, signs and lighting, utilities, drainage and control of potentially adverse effects generally have been considered and will be further considered administratively during the process of issuing individual building permits and certificates of occupancy. A-11 of 11 02+1249 Exhibit "B" Lots 1 through 8, inclusive, Block 2, together with all of Blocks 3 and 4, Du Pont Plaza, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 50, Page 11, public records of Miami -Dade County, Florida. 02--1249 Exhibit "C" Page 1 of 3 One Miami Project Data ZONING DISTRICT CBD LOT AREA GROSS SF ACRES NET SF Tract B 163,785 3.78 107,343 Tract C 119,790 2.75 75,780 Tract D 121,532 2.79 75,777 FLOOR AREA Maximum Allowed: Unlimited Floor Area Ratio Actual: SF GROSS LOT AREA FAR Tract B 717,745 + 163,785 = 4.38 Tract C 605,425 + 119,790 = 5.05 Tract D 830,750 + 121,532 = 6.84 LOT COVERAGE Required: Not Applicable Actual: BLDG COVERAGE GROSS AREA PERCENT COVERAG Tract B 72,425 + 163,785 = 44% Tract C 61,425 + 119,790 = 51% Tract D 67,375 - 121,532 = 55% OPEN SPACE Required: One SF of open space per 50 SF of floor area over 50,000 SF Actual: SF REQ•D SF PROWD Tract B 717,745 - 50,000 = 667,745 + 50 = 13,355 39,164 Tract C 605,425 - 50,000 = 555,425 + 50 = 11,109 48,461 Tract D 830,750 - 50,000 = 780,750 + 50 = 15,615 47,430 02-1249 Exhibit "C" Page 2 of 3 One Miami Project Data HEIGHT Allowable: Unlimited Actual: ' Tract B 400'-0" (top of roof) Tract C 400'-0" (top of roof) Tract D 750'-0" (top of roof) SETBACKS Required: 5'-0" from all streets 1,000 units per acre Provided: NORTH SOUTH EAST WEST Tract B 15'-0" 8'-0" 5'-0" 10'-0" Tract C 15'-0"- 8'-0" 5'-0" . 30'-0" Tract D 5'-0" 5'-0" 5'-0" 15'-0" DENSITY Allowable: 1,000 units per acre Provided: USE SF UNITS UNITS ! ACRE Tract B Retail 81,275 Theaters 61,300 Residential 602,245 400 400 + 3.78 = 106 Tract C Retail 32,850 Office 9,000 Residential 633,785 450 450 + 2.75 = 164 Tract D Retail 25,700 Health Club 17,500 Residential 799,755 650 650 + 2.79 = 233 02-1249 Exhibit "C" Page 3 of 3 One Miami Project Data PARKING Required: No minimum parking requirements Maximum: Office 1 space per 1,000 SF over 10,000 SF Residential 1 spaces per unit Retail 1 space per 1,000 SF Restaurant 1 space per 100 SF USE SF or UNITS SPACES REQUIRED Tract B Retail + Cinema 142,575 + 1,000 = 143 Residential 400 x 1 = 400 Total Spaces Required Tract B = .543 Tract C Retail 32,850 + 1,000 = 33 Office 9,000 + 0 = 0 Residential 450 x 1 = 450 Total Spaces Required Tract C = 483 Tract D Retail 25,700 + 1,000 = 26 Health Club 17,500 + 1,000 = 18 Residential 650 x 1 = 650 Total Spaces Required Tract D = 693 Total Spaces Required = 1,719 Provided: See chart already done Tract B Tract C Tract D East West PROVIDED SPACES 926 922 1,467 Total Parking Provided = 4,284 02-1249 EXHIBIT "D" Archaeological and Historical Conservancy, In( 4800 S.W. 6411' Avenue, Suite 107 Davie, FL 33314 954/792.9776 Fax 954/7929954 Sarah Eaton City of Miaini Planning & Zoning Department PO Box 330708 Miami, Fl. 33233-0708 RE: Mianii One Archaeological Management Plan October 29, 2002 Dear Ms, Eaton, This is provided as an archaeological management plan for the Miami One project encompassing parcels B, C, and D (see attached figures). The goal of this plan is to provide for the documentation, recovery, and preservation of archaeological data and objects that might occur within the project area footprint. It is the intent of this plan to meet all guidelines and requirements as stated in City of Miami Historic Preservation Ordinances, the general intent of Miami -Dade County Ordinance 16A-10 and the review process of the County Archaeologist, and the State of Florida's Unmarked Human Burial Act 872.05, as it might pertain to any human remains that might occur within the project parcel. The basis of this plan is a Phase 1 archaeological survey that had been conducted across parcels B, C, and D by the Archaeological and Historical Conservancy in 2000 and 2002 (see enclosed report copies). Field Investigations Field investigations will be conducted across the project parcel prior to any construction activities. The investigations will proceed in the following parcel order: D, B, and C, to follow the sequence of proposed parcel development. Work will begin in Parcel D using an open area excavation methodology, based on 100 -foot study squares that will be examined using mechanical equipment to strip away the parking lot asphalt to allow for documentation of any archaeological materials that occur on the parcel. Selective trenching by a back -hoe will be conducted to a depth below bedrock to provide documentation of stratigraphy, disturbances, etc. Any solution holes, features, or undisturbed areas will be subject to hand excavation using a minimum of 5 foot square excavation units. All prehistoric and historic cultural material will be collected and the documentation of significant features will be completed. A base line grid will be placed across each parcel to provide reference points for mapping. Maps for each parcel will be completed that will depict all test units, excavation areas, features, a base line grid, and elevations. Investigations on parcels B and C will use a combination of techniques but with more reliance on using expansive open area excavations since previous auguring tests in those r�)-1.249 ZO 3r) ,-� 3NI OHV VSGGZZ6LVSGT 9'.:ST c00<7/cU /60 EXHIBIT "D" Page 2 of 4 two parcels indicate that more intact sediments exist in B and C than in parcel D. Samples of sediments, feat»res, and any significant elements will be collected througliout the study area. Monitoring All initial construction excavations, digging, trenching, etc., will be subject to monitoring by archaeologists. Documentation of all recovered objects and features will be permitted by the developer as part of the project process. Research An extensive land use history of the project parcels will be conducted by a historian. This research will be provided as a written report on the project parcels that will include but not be limited to the Spanish periods, early American Period (Ft. Dallas occupation and the Royal Palm Hotel). Aual�ysis All recovered materials will be subject to cleaning, cataloging, and analysis. Samples of faunal bone, botanical remains, and sediments will be subject to intensive analysis to allow for a reconstruction of both the cultural and environmental history of the area. Organic samples will be subject to radiocarbon date determinations, and other types of chemical or physical analyses are possible. All results of analysis will be provided in the final report. Collections All recovered specimens will be donated to the Historical Museum of Southern Florida in Miami for their reference collection and potential exhibits. The developer reserves the right to use some specimens for display and exhibit purposes within the Miami One complex. .Reports Copies of final reports will be provided to the City of Miami Historic Preservation Board, the Miami -Dade County Archaeologist, and the historical Musetun of Southern Florida, and any other interested agency or institution. Unexpected Discoveries In the event of an unanticipated discovery of a significant feature such as a human grave(s), structural foundations, or other unusual or unique features of historic or archaeological significance, such discoveries will be reported to the City of Mi�uni ]Historic Preservation Board and County Archaeologist within 48 hours after the discovery. if human remains are discovered then the guidelines of State Statue 872.05, the Unmarked Human Craves Act, will be followed. It is the intent of the developer that such discoveries will be fully documented and preserved whenever possible, A special area within the pedestrian plaza in Parcel B ,will be set aside as a public viewing space for the exhibition and preservation of jury significant features. Human remains, if any are found, will be respectfully reinterred in a c�l���,! EO 39hJ DNI JHt� bSE6�6LbSET 8Z '�T �E1;'cC2 4 9 EXHIBIT "D" Page 3of4 designated space in the plaza or wherever Native Americans working in concert with Florida's Department of Historic Resources so advise. Sincerely, ,O� � d, --- Robert S. Carr Executive Director RSC/sk 02-1249 r�� 39Vd DNI 'DHh VS66ZGLPSGT 67 -:SZ E9OZ/N/6e MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA MIAMhDADE EXHIBIT "D" Page 4 of 4 24DoZ . 5-5 OFFICE OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION 140 WEST FLAGLER STREET SUITE 1102 MIAMI, FLORIDA 33130-1561 305-375-4958 Facsimile 305.372-6394 October 18, 2002 Mr. Robert S. Carr Archaeological and Historical Conscrvancy Inc. 4800 S.W. 60' Avenue, Suitt 107 Davie, Florida 33314 Re; :Miami One parcels Dear Bob: This offiec has reviewed the archaeological and historical assessment of the Miarni One Parcels. This officr concurs with the recommendations offered in the assessinent. !f necessary call me at 305 375 3412 Si ly Gary I�. 13t11GY, RI'A C. Ivan Rodriguez 02-1249 50 39Vd DNI -')HV G%:ST. .a�zi�cf�a EXHIBIT "E" RESOLUTION HEPB-2002-68 A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COMMISSION APPROVAL OF AN APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS FOR GROUND DISTURBING ACTIVITY IN CONJUNCTION WITH AN APPLICATION FOR A SUBSTANTIAL MODIFICATION TO A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT (MUSP) FOR PARCELS B, C AND D OF THE ONE MIAMI PROJECT (APPLICATION NO. 2002-069), LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY 200 SE 2ND STREET, 200 SE 3RD STREET AND 300 SE 3RD STREET, WITHIN THE DUPONT ARCHEOLOGICAL CONSERVATION AREA, SUBJECT TO THE--------- CONDITION(S) SET FORTH IN ATTACHMENT "A"; AFTER CONSIDERING THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE MIAMI- DADE COUNTY ARCHEOLOGIST CONCERNING THE REQUIRED SCOPE OF ARCHEOLOGICAL WORK AND INCORPORATING SAID RECOMMENDATIONS INTO THE ATTACHED CONDITION(S) AND FINDING THAT THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CONDITIONS WILL PROVIDE FOR THE DOCUMENTATION, RECOVERY AND PRESERVATION OF ARCHEOLOGICAL DATA AND OBJECTS THAT MIGHT OCCUR WITHIN THE PROJECT AREA FOOTPRINT. PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 19TH DA Y.- OF NOVEMBER, 2002. C 1 RESERVATION OFFICER 02-1249 CITY OF MIAMI CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Priscilla A. Thompson City Clerk //� FROM: Alejandro City Attor DATE: April 15, Y03 RE: Corrected Scrivener's Error Resolution No. 02-1249, adopted November 19, 2002. 70 N N The Planning and Zoning Department has advised us that Resolution No. 02-1249, adopted November 19, 2002, contains a scrivener's error. The Development Order (attached as Exhibit A to the executed Resolution) indicates an incorrect date in one of the conditions of approval. Additionally, an incorrect "Exhibit D" was attached while two other exhibits were not attached to the executed Resolution. The attachment to this memorandum, which is a substitute original resolution to replace the document you presently possess as Resolution No. 02-1249, has been revised to reflect the above -referenced changes and the appropriate exhibits have been attached. After the correct document has been executed, please forward a copy to this Office and to Ana Gelabert-Sanchez, Director, Planning and Zoning. This memorandum may be attached to Resolution No. 02-1249 so that any concern regarding the substitution of said Resolution and its attachments is clarified. AV:GKW Attachments C: Joel Edward Maxwell, Deputy City Attorney Ana Gelabert-Sanchez, Director, Planning and Zoning Lourdes Slayzk, Assistant Director, Planning and Zoning George K. Wysong, III, Assistant City Attorney U:\GEORGE\GKW\PAB\Memo from AV to PST re Miami One scriveners.doc J- 965 11/1 /02 RESOLUTION NO. 02-1249 RESOLUTION OF THE MIAMI CITY COMMISSION, W H ATTACHMENTS, APPROVING WITH CONDITIO A UBSTANTIAL MODIFICATION TO RESOLUT ON NO. -1151, A MAJOR USE SPECIAL P MIT PURSU TO ARTICLES 13, 17 AND 22 OF ONING ORDINAN NO. 11000, FOR THE ON MIAMI PARCELS "C" AND "D" PROJEC , TO BE LOCATED BE EEN SOUTHEAST 2ND AND 4TH STREETS AND BETWEEN UTHEAST 2ND AVENUE D BISCAYNE BOULEVARD, M I, FLORIDA; APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT ORD DIRECTING TRANSMITTAL OF THIS RESOLUTION; KING FI INGS OF FACT AND STATING CONCLUSION OF W; PROVIDING FOR BINDING EFFECT; CO AI ING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE AND PROVIDING F AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, on /ast2 1998, e City Commission approved Resolution No. 9ich approve a Master Development Program for the cated between outheast 2nd and 4tn Streets and Southenue and Biscayne Boulevard, Miami, Florida; and /"APPCANT") on September 6, 2002, Ricardo Glas, \Special Centre, LP., (hereinafter referred submitted a complete application for a and to Resolution No. 98-1151, a Major Permit for the One Miami- Parcels "B", "C", and "D" Project 1i 1ti Qi $il SUPERSEDED MY comas SETING QB P,".,,, , - 2002 R--' dan No. V2-i�49 pursu%ntto Article 13, 17 and 22 of Zoning Ordinance No. 1100 ,the Zg Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, as ame ed, (the "Zoning Ordinance") to approve a specific roject (hereinafter eferred to as the "PROJECT") for t property located between Southeast 2nd and 4th Streets and between Southeast 2nd Avenu and Biscayne Boulevard, M' mi, Florida, as legally described in " hibit "B"; and WHEREAS, development of the PROJEC requires the issuance of a Substantial Modificat'on to a ajor Use Special Permit pursuant to Articles 13, 17 nd 22 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, the Zoning Ordinance of t e City of Miami, Florida, as amended; and WHEREAS, the Large Scale Develo ment Committee met on August 12, 2002, to co Sider the proposed ROJECT and offer its input; and WHEREAS, th APPLICANT has modified the pro osed PROJECT to address the xpressed technical concerns raised t that Large Scale Deve opment Committee meeting; and W REAS, the Planning and Zoning Department revie ed the pro' ct for design appropriateness throughout the re- plication phase and, upon modifications in the final des' n proposal, recommended approval of the final design solution to the Planning and Zoning Director; and SUPERSEDED Page 2 of 10 02_1249 HEREAS, the Urban Development Review Board met on August 2 , 2002, to consider the proposed PROJE and recommende denial of the PROJECT based on conc rns over potential tra is congestion in the area, not base on how the project meets th public realm; and WHEREAS, the ami Planning Advisory Boa d, at its meeting held on October 16, 2 02, Item No. 12, fo owing an advertised public hearing, adopted esolution No. AB 70-02 by a vote of seven to zero (7-0), RECOM ENDING AP ROVAL of the Substantial Modification to the Major Use Spe al Permit Development Order as attached and incorporated; an WHEREAS, the City Commis ion de ms it advisable and in the best interest of the gene al welfare f the City of Miami to issue a Substantial Mod'fication to a Ma r Use Special Permit Development Order as ereinafter set forth; a WHEREAS, the iami Historic and Environme al Preservation Board, at its eting held on November 19, 2002, following an advertised p lic hearing, adopted Resolution No. PB -2002-68 RECOMMENDI G APPROVAL of the application for a Certif tate of Appropriateness for ground disturbing activity subjec to cert in conditions; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA: SUPERSEDED Page 3 of 10 02-1249 S ction 1. The recitals and findings contained in e Preamble to this Resolution are adopted by referenc and incorporated s if fully set forth in this Section. Section 2. A Substantial Modification to Major Use Special Permit De lopment Order, attached and ncorporated as Exhibit "A", is appro ed subject to the con 'tions specified in the Development Order, er Article 17 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, for the PROJECT be deve oped by the APPLICANT, at Southeast 2nd and 4th Street a Southeast 2nd Avenue and Biscayne Boulevard, Miami, Flo d more particularly described in Exhibit "B" attached and ' corporat d. Section 3. The ROJECT is a roved as a phased development. Section 4. The Development Program ap oved pursuant to Resolution No 98-1151 (attached hereto as E ibit "D" is amended to reflect the subtraction of the specific evelopment program eing approved for Parcels "B", "C", and "D" he ein, as foll ws: SUPERSEDED Page 4 of 10 02-1249 Section 5. The Substantial Modification to the Major Use Special Permit Application for t PROJECT also encompasses the lower ranking Special Per t as set forth in the Development Order (Exhibit "A")Z Section 6. The rntertainmen center located at the Northeast corner ofst 4th Street and Southeast 3rd Avenue is hereby Xothe ed a "retail and special\center." Section 7.findings of fact set elow are made with respectsubject PROJECT: 1�/Regional on of 250,000 sq. ft. of office to residential as f llows: ) .0044)= 1,100 units using the same coefficients for n approved in the Area Wide Downtown Miami Development of Impact, which this property is a part thereof. ��on of 250,000 sq. ft. of office to residential as follows: )(.0044)= 1,100 units using the same coefficients for on approved in the Area Wide Downtown Miami Development of Impact, which this property is a part thereof. SUPERSEDED Page 5 of 10 02. 1249 Approved Approved Requested for Us Pursuant Pursuant Parcels Balance To To "B", "C" and Resolution Resolution "D" 98-1151 No. 02-858 Office 200,000 28,000 9,0001 913, 00 sq ft. Retail 400 000 17,000 218,625 164,375 sq. ft. Residential 1,5 0 900 1,5002 units 200 Hotel 0 0 300 rooms 300 Section 5. The Substantial Modification to the Major Use Special Permit Application for t PROJECT also encompasses the lower ranking Special Per t as set forth in the Development Order (Exhibit "A")Z Section 6. The rntertainmen center located at the Northeast corner ofst 4th Street and Southeast 3rd Avenue is hereby Xothe ed a "retail and special\center." Section 7.findings of fact set elow are made with respectsubject PROJECT: 1�/Regional on of 250,000 sq. ft. of office to residential as f llows: ) .0044)= 1,100 units using the same coefficients for n approved in the Area Wide Downtown Miami Development of Impact, which this property is a part thereof. ��on of 250,000 sq. ft. of office to residential as follows: )(.0044)= 1,100 units using the same coefficients for on approved in the Area Wide Downtown Miami Development of Impact, which this property is a part thereof. SUPERSEDED Page 5 of 10 02. 1249 a. Th PROJECT is in conformity with the adopted Mia Comp hensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000, as amen d. b. The PR JECT is in accord with the CBD ( entral Business istrict) Zoning classifications f Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Flori a, as amended. C. Pursuant to Sect i n 1305 of the Zo ng Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, the specific site plan aspects of the PROJE T, i.e., ingress and egress, parking, sign and lig in , utilities, drainage, preservation of natural eatures and control of potentially adverse of ects generally, have been considered and w' 1 be urther considered administratively d ing the proc s of issuing a building permit a d a certificate of oc upancy. d. The PROJECT is expected to cost pproximately $428,366,21 and to employ approximately 5 workers during c struction; the PROJECT will also r sult in the cr ation of approximately 470 permanent new 'obs. The PROJECT will generate approximately $9,952, 32 a nually in tax revenues to local units of governmen (2002 dollars). SUPERSEDED Page 6 of 10 02-1-249 e. The PROJECT and the proposed conversion of uses is in onformity and consistent with the Area Wide Downto n Mia i Development of Regional Impact. f. The Ci y Commission further finds that: (1) the ROJECT will have a favorable imp ct on the econom of the City; (2) the PRO CT will efficientl use public transportati facilities; (3) any potentiall adverse e ects of the PROJECT will be mitigate thro h compliance with the conditions of this Ma r Use Special Permit; (4) the PROJECT will vora ly affect the need for people to fin adequat housing reasonably accessible to heir places of ployment; (5) the PROJEC will efficiently use ecessary public facilit es; (6) the PROJECT will not negatively pact the e ironment and natural resources of the ty; (7) the PROJECT will not adversely affect 1'ving conditions in the neighborhood; (8) the PROJECT will not adversely affect public safety; SUPERSEDED Page 7 of 10 02-1249 (9) based on the record presented and evidenc presented, the public welfare will be serve by the PROJECT; and (10) any potentially adverse effects of th PROJECT a 'sing from safety and security, fir protection and life safety, solid wa e, heritage conser tion, trees, minority articipation and employmen and minority cont actor/ subcontractor participatio will be mitigated through compliance with the cond'tions of this Major Use Special Permit. Section 8. The Substant al\amded, ation to the Major Use Special Permit, as appro ed and shall be binding upon the APPLICANT and any ccessors rest. Section 9. The application for a Substantial Modification to the Major Use Special Permit, which was submitted on Septe er 6, 2002, and is on fi e with the Department of Pla ning and Zoning of the City of Miami Florida, shall be elied upon generally for admini rative interpretati ns and is incorporated by reference. Sect' n 10. The City Manager is directed to instruct t e Directo of the Department of Planning and Zoning to transmit a copy of this Resolution and attachment to the developers: SUPERSEDED Page 8 of 10 02-1249 Gil b rto Pastoriza, Esq., on behalf of Ricardo Glas, Trustee, and Mi i One Centre, LP, 2665 South Bayshore Drive, Suite 42 , Miami, F1 ida 33133. Section 1. The Findings of Fact and Conclusion of Law are made with respect to the PROJECT as descri d in the Development Order (Exhibit "A") for the PROJECT attached and incorporated. Section 12. In t e event that any p rtion or section of this Resolution or the velopment 0 der (Exhibit "A") is determined to be invalid, i egal, or unconstitutional by a court or agency of competent ju ' diction, such decision shall in no manner affect the remain' g po tions of this Resolution or Development Order (Exhibit "A"), whi shall remain in full force and effect. Section 13. T provisions in this Substantial Modification to t Major Use Special Permit, a approved, shall commence and ecome operative thirty (30) da after the adoption of his Resolution. Sec ion 14. This Substantial Modification to t Major Use S ecial Permit, as approved, shall expire two (2) years from i commencement and operative date. SUPERSEDED Page 9 of 10 02-1249 3i If the Mayor does not sign this Resolution, it shall become effective at the end of ten calendar days from the date it was passed and adopted. If the Mayor vetoes this Resolution, it shall become effective immediately upon override of the veto by the City Commission. SUPERSEDED Page 10 of 10 "EXHIBIT A" ATTACHMENT TO RESOLUTION NO., . 2 2 MIAMI PARCELS B, C AND D PROJECT MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT DEVELOPMENT ORDER / Let it be known tha pursuant to Artic s 13, 17 and 22 of Ordinance NO. 11000, the Zo ing Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended (the "Zo ing Or 'nance"), the Miami City Commission in Miami -Dade County, F orida, has considered in a public hearing, the issuance of ubstantial Modification to a Major Use Special Permit for he One iami Parcels B, C, and D Project (hereinafter referr d to as the PROJECT") to be located between SE 2nd and 4th treets and betwe SE 2nd Avenue and Biscayne Boulevard, iami, Florida (see le 1 description on "Exhibit B", attac ed and incorporated). The Pr ject is subject to any dedications, limitations, restrictions, re ervations or easements of record. Afte due consideration of the recommendations of the Planni g Advisory Board and after due consideration o the con istency of this proposed development with the Mi mi omprehensive Neighborhood Plan, the City Commission ha 92-1249 abproved the PROJECT, and subject to the following conditi aPer ves the Major Use Special Permit and issues this Permit FINDINGS OF FACT PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The proposedROJECT is a residential/mix d use development to be located betwee SE 2nd and 4th Street and between SE 2nd Avenue and Biscayne Bo evard, Miami,Fl rida. The PROJECT is located on a gross lot a a of appro mately 9.32 acres and a net lot area of approxim ely specifically described in "Exhi , reference). The remainder .94 acres of land (more t B," incorporated herein by the PROJECT's Data Sheet is attached and incorporated as "Exhibit \'st The proposed PROD T will cf a mixed use residential/commercial evelopment ony blocks, with no more than 1,500 re idential units wsory recreational space, approximat ly 218,625 square feet of retail/entertainment uses and appr imately 9,000 square feet of offic uses. The PROJECT wil also provide approximately 4,284 parking aces. The ownership, operation and maintenance of commo areas and fa ilities will be by the property owner or (in the ca of the property being converted to condominiums) a mandato y A-2 of 11 o2-1249 propty owner association in perpetuity pursuant to a record Declara 'on of Covenants and Restrictions. / The Major Use Special Permit Application for the ,PROJECT also encompass` s the following lower ranking Special Pcdrmits and approvals: CLASS I SPECIAL PE IT as per Section 915.2 f FAA clearance letter. CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT s per Article 9, Section 925.3.8, to allow development/construc ion/rental sign e. CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as er Artic 9, Section 918.2 for parking and staging of construction du ing construction. CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Artxh5Ae 9, Section 920.1, to allow a trailer and watchman's quarte s for construction and other temporary office uses such as le sing and sales. CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as r Article 9, Section 922.4(c) to allow maneuvering of trucks n public rig h s of way. CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, ection 906.6, for pool/outdoor recreation area. CLASS I SPECIAL PE IT as per Article 9, Section 917.1.2 to allow valet parkin for residential and other uses. CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 906. to allow for a special vent, namely a ground breaking ceremony. CLASS I SP CIAL PERMIT as per Article 4, Section 401 to allow for bars, saloons, taverns and/or supper clubs. CLAS SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 4, Section 401 to all for ild day care facilities. ASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 917.1.1 to low backing into a street. A-3 of 11 02-1249 CLASII SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 4, Section 401, f r develo ment of new construction within the Central Bus i ss Distric CLASS II XPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 90 .2 for access from public street roadway width greater than 2X feet. CLASS II SPECIA PERMIT as per Article 4, Section 40 to approve open space and /o residential recreation space as shown on the plans. CLASS II SPECIAL PER\trian Article 4, Sec ion 401 to allow for wholesale actithe ground oor level along designated primary ppathways so ng as ground floor frontage consists of r open to th public component. CLASS II SPECIAL PERArticle 4, Section 401 to allow for parking garages. CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per rt'cle 4, Section 401 to allow for outdoor eating areas, outdoo cafes, outdoor display and sale of food or live flowers and la ts. CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per/Article \9, Section 922.8 to allow for combined off-street loadi cr faciliti s. CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT aper Article 9, Section 903.1 to allow development of a project/divided by a street. CLASS II SPECIAL YPERIT, as per Article 4, S tion 401, for a temporary construn fence and covered wal ay within the Central Business Dict. MAJOR USE SPEC L PERMIT, per Article 17, Sectio\amended, nd Article 22 of ity of Miami Zoning Ordinance 11000, to allow a change in the original application al modificati0 for previously approved Resolution 1) from 383,0 0 square feet (as modified by Resolution8) of nonre idential floor area to approximately 227re feet. MAJO USE SPECIAL PERMIT, per Article 17, Section 1701, and Ar cle 22 of City of Miami Zoning Ordinance 11000, as amended, Zodification allow a change in the original application (substantial for previously approved Resolution No. 98-1151) A-4 of 11 02-1249 f om parking structures consisting of 5,815 spaces (as modifi by esolution No. 02-858) to approximately 4,284 spaces. MAJOR \USE SPECIAL PERMIT, per Article 17, SecIN and Article 22 of City of Miami Zoning Ordinanceas amended, to allow a change in the origination (substanti 1 modification for previously apprution No. 98-1151) to convert 250,000 square feet ofe to residential se using the same co -efficient in Increment I the Downtown Miami Developmeional Impact. (250\000) x (.0044) = 1,100 uni Prior to above conve Sion, 1,172,000 squ re feet (Resolution No. 98-1151 as modifi by Resolution o. 02-858) of office was available. After t conversion ,022,000 square feet is still available. Prior o above co ersion, 600 residential units (Resolution No. 98 1151 as modified by Resolution No. 02-858) were available. ter ove conversion, 1,700 units are now available. Fifteen hun e (1,500) units are approved. Request Waiver by City Commission from Chapter 36 of the Miami City Code, the Noise Ordinapece, t allow continuous concrete pours while under constructs . Designation, per Miami Ciy Code Chapter 4, of the entertainment retail center located the Northeast rner of Southeast 3rd Avenue and Southeast 4 Street as a retail specialty center, as that term is defined An Section 4-2. Request for a Cgitificate of Appropriateness, per Miami City Code Chapter Yonservation 5(a), for ground disturbing ctivity in an Archaeological Area. Designation as a phased project, pursuant to Section 2502 of Zoning Or nance No. 11000, as amended (approved by solution No. 98-1 51) from parcel A, B, C, D to east half of \first, then B nd C, then west half of D. REQU ST that the following MUSP conditions be required at the ti e of issuance of the Temporary Certificate of Occupancy r F nal Certificate of Occupancy (whichever comes first) instead of at the time of the issuance of the foundation permit: A-5 of 11 02-1249 a. the requirement to record in the Public Records a \b.th ration of Covenants and Restrictions provi ng the ownership, operation and maintenance of all n areas and facilities will be by the pr perty or a mandatory property owner association• and requirement to record in the Public ecords a of title or covenant in lieu of unity of title. Pursuant to ticles 13 and 17 of the Z ing Ordinance, approval of the req ested Major Use Specia Permit shall be considered sufficient f the subordinate ermits requested and referenced above as well a any other s cial approvals required by the City which may be re ired carry out the requested plans. The PROJECT shall be co tructed substantially in accordance with plans and de ign sche tics on file prepared by Nichols Brosch Sandoval, dated August 9, 2002; design and landscape plans may be odified only to the extent necessary to comply with the cc ditions for approval imp sed herein; all modifications sha be subject to the review and proval of the Director of th Department of Planning and Zoning p for to the issuance of ny building permits. The ROJECT conforms to the requirements of the ntral Busine s District Zoning District, as contained in Ordina ce No. 11000, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, s amended. A-6 of 11 02-1249 existing comprehensive plan future land use designation on the `kubject property allows the proposed mix of residential, office and\Commercial uses. CONDITIONS THE APPLICANT, I'B'S SUCCESSORS, AND/OR ASSIGN%, JOINTLY OR SEVERALLY, PRIOR TO THE\permit. ANY BUILDIN PERMITS, SHALL COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWIN 1. Meet all applicabcod land development regulations, ordinar la 2. Payment of all appd e and owing prior to the issuance of a build 3. Allow the Miami Police Depa tme t to conduct a security survey, at the/ingand of the epartment, and to make recommendations g securit measures and systems; further submit ao the Depa ment of Planning and Zoning, priorcommencement of construction, demonstrating hoice Department ecommendations, if any, have been ed into the Pr 'ect security and construction plamonstrate to the Director of the Department of Pld Zoning why such ecommendations are impractical. 4. Obtain approv 1 from, or provide a letter\develpment e Department of Fire -Rescue indicating s coordinatio with members of the Fire Plan Revn at the De rtment of Fire -Rescue in the review oe of the oject, owner responsibility, building process and review procedures, as well arequi ements for fire projection and life safe, exit'ng, vehicular access and water supply. 5.O tain approval from, or provide a letter of assurance from he Department of Solid Waste that the Project has A-7 of 11 02-1249 ressed all concerns of the said Department prior to ainment of a shell permit. 6. Prep re a Minority Participation and Emp/undestanding Plan (incl ding a Contractor/Subcontractor Particlan) to be ubmitted to the City's Director of Equment Opportun'ty for review and comments, with the that the pplicant must use its best efforts the provisions of the City's Minority/Women Busairs and Procurem nt Program as a guide. 7. Record the fol owing in the Public Records f Dade County, Florida, prior o the issuance of a Temp rary Certificate of Occupancy or rtificate of Occupancy a Declaration of Covenants and Res ictions providing at the ownership, operation and mai tenance of all common areas and facilities will be b the property owner or a mandatory property owner associat'on in perpet ity. 8. Prior to the issuance of shell ermit, demonstrate to the City that the condominium docu ents have been filed with the State of Florida; or b provide the City with an executed, recordable unity o title or covenant in -lieu of unity of title agreement r the subject property; said agreement shall be subjec to he review and approval of the City Attorney's Offic . 9. Provide the Departme of Public Works with plans for proposed sidewalk an Swale area i rovements (including implementation of the Burle Marx Plan for Biscayne Boulevard) for i s review and appr al prior to the issuance of a bui ding permit. 10. Provide the partment of Planning and Zoning with a temporary pa ing plan, including an ope tional plan, which addre ses construction employee parkin during the construct i period, said plan shall include an enforcement plan and hall be subject to the review and appro al by the Departm t of Planning and Zoning prior to the is uance of any ilding permits and shall be enforced during const uction activity. 11. Pu suant to the Departments of Police, Fire -Rescue \ neral Services Administration, the roof area of roposed structures shall be made available to the City A-8 of 11 02-1249 iami for any necessary communications equipment at barge to the City. 12. Ift e project is to be developed in phases, the App cant shall submit an interim plan, including a landscap plan, which ddresses design details for the land o cupying future p ses of this Project in the event that e future phases ar not developed, said plan shall include a proposed ti etable and shall be subject to review and approval by t e Director of the Department o Planning and Zoning. 13. The Applicant hall comply with he "Miami One Archeological Manag ment Plan" prepared by Robert S. Carr, dated October 31, 001, and amend d by Historic and Environmental Preser tion Board esolution No. HEPB 2002-68 on November 19, 2002. The iami One Archeological Management Plan (attac d as xhibit "D") and HEPB resolution (attached as xhib't "E") are incorporated herein by reference and are o file with the Planning and Zoning Department. 14. Within 90 days of the efp6ctive date of this Development Order, record a certifi copy o the Development Order specifying that theX�eelopment Or r runs with the land and is binding on Applicant, its successors, and assigns, jointly or slly. 15. Given the signif' ance of the subject p operties in the heart of the dow town area, the Applicant s 11 provide for decorative con ruction fencing while the pr ect is being built; desig of such fencing shall be subje t to review and approval by the Director of Planning and Zoni g. 16. The Appl' ant shall continue to work with the Plan ing and Zoning epartment to address design issues related o the Projec s' rooftops in order to address concerns asso 'ated with the final building elevations and consistency of arc itectural elements. THE CITY SHALL: A-9 of 11 02-1249 Es\abhoperative date of this Permit as being thirty (30) dadate of its issuance; the issuance date sh 1 constitmencement of the thirty (30) day peri to appeal visions of the Permit. CONCLUS The PROJECT, pr osed by the APPLICANT, com ies with the Miami Comprehensive Nei hborhood Plan 1989-200 , is consistent with the orderly developme t and goals of the City of Miami, and complies with local land evelopment egulations. Further, pursuant to Section 1703 of the oning 0 dinance: (1) the PROJECT will have a favorable impact on the economy of the City; and (2) the PROJECT will effic ently se public transportation facilities; and (3) the PROJECT will favorably affect he need for people to find adeq ate housing reasonabl accessible to their place of employment; and (4) the PROJ CT will efficiently use neces ary public facili ies; and (5) the ROJECT will not negatively impact the envi onment d natural resources of the City; and (6) the PROJECT will not adversely affect public safet and A-10 of 11 02-1249 the public welfare will be served by the PROJEC/Special (8) ny potentially adverse effects of the PROJECTe mit' ated through conditions of this Major Use Permit. The proposed velopment does not unreasona y interfere with the achievement of he objectives of the a pted State Land Development Plan applicable o the City of Mi i. Pursuant to Section 130 of the ning Ordinance, the specific site plan aspects of th PR JECT i.e., ingress and egress, offstreet parking and loadin efuse and service areas, signs and lighting, utilities drain e and control of potentially adverse effects g erally have b n considered and will be further considered administratively duri the process of issuing individual uilding permits and certi icates of occupancy. A-11 of 11 92-1249 LIC ac Q 02-1249 ONE MIAMI ZONING ANALYSIS AwjW 2Z 2W CSD Tows 153, >.n IWAU Oft* »S Par 000 3E Tod C 114750 27{ T&M \ Tod D 121,82 2.7t 7{,777 w ntMtf te11MaS SPAMAtlOfp LOOR AA',EA 0001F004 14Rp{ • 350 VA"m AIe..G Udniad f9aar 400 s I �0� Agok K MOM Of eM Tend C Teat 6 717,7" • 14t7" • 4.]5 a0a1fM offSaw Trade 50442{ • 114700 id{ w4r S-• TOM D 574750 • MOM • &M 94r s4• OT COVERAGE Tmdo f•0' f -0•P !144th C01 Raoliat NatApp5ea0Y Agwk OENSRY RaW61Ad tato s 3 1.744 •TwlMarroMwod• LO/40 mn fI11moll" ► 7/6070 M Tends 72425 • l4%m - 4416 Loaf TmatC Stan • 114700 - 011% TIM 0 p,37S • 121,412 - 0617 )PEN SPACE Raai0d4W 667.m 40 400 • 176 - Rat1~ on@ r of afar afm par 3o s so New Atltat avant a•aa {0.000 s 3$770 Of a ar WPROae Tract 717,7" - IAWD - 0p•7" • 50 - It Ski" TmdC !04426 — AAWD - U4426 • 50 - 114100 4440 Tract 774730= 64000 • 704760 • 50 - 14010 47AW A lr Unitrttad Adust.aat . Oft* »S Par 000 3E Tod 1 400-0' tome ef'e•0 2loom per mit \ Tend C 4W.0' 0me amen w ntMtf te11MaS SPAMAtlOfp Tenet D 760.0• 0001F004 14Rp{ • 350 SETBACKS 400 s I �0� Row~ f•0' S-rtt d dmab Powi4ad Taal Maa7naf AU-dd • 1"00 Tend C Red f0m a0a1fM offSaw 4000 • I4s Tract 1{-o• w4r S-• 10-0• Tend C 11W 94r s4• SD -V Tmdo f•0' f -0•P !144th C01 frW OENSRY RaW61Ad tato s 3 1.744 •TwlMarroMwod• AttsaWa: 1.000 units Par.em Pm tAW -414.4 Ulf Or Loaf k""m A00 Tmd 6 Red 61.p6 TWaM7 ft= Raai0d4W 667.m 40 400 • 176 - 106 Tract Rda/ 3$770 Of a ROOD RarOantld 11414666 "D • 275 - 164 Tend D Reil 28330 t4uflh Mal 24000 Raaidr w 764160 i0 MO • 276 - 233 RaaPti•d: Ns�mrnamar-prtlp Maaown: . Oft* »S Par 000 3E Raatarald 2loom per mit Rdd Rdml4ad 1 spas M 300 SR w ntMtf te11MaS SPAMAtlOfp Tenet 6 14Rp{ • 350 im 400 s I �0� Taal Maa7naf AU-dd • 1"00 Tend C Red 327M • 700 t0• O11ta 4000 • I4s 1{ RaatlrW 450 S 3 Tidal M=dRwnANw4• SAM T 0 ' Ra411 24500 • 700 • !144th C01 24000 • 300 p RaW61Ad tato s 3 1.744 •TwlMarroMwod• tAW EXHIBIT "C" i i I I a2-1249 "EXHIBIT D" J-98-1 28 11/16/9 RESOLUTION NO. 5 1 A RESOLUTION, WITH ATTACHMENTS, APPROVING WI CONDITIONS, A MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT, PURS TO ARTICLES 13 AND 17 OF ZONING ORDI CE NO. 11000, FOR THE ONE 'PROJE TO BE LOCATED AT THE PROPERTI S GENERALE BOUNDED BY SOUTHEAST 2ND AVENUE ON THE WEST, BISCAYNE BOULEVARD WAY AND THE MIAMI RIVE ON THE SOUTH, BISCAYNB BAY TIM EAST AND SO T 2ND AND 3RD STREETS N THE NORTH, MIAMI, FLORIDA; TO BE COMPRIS OF A PHASED PROJE DEVELOPMENT, CONSISTI G OF 300 HOTEL ROOMS, 1 0 RESIDENTIAL UNIT , 400,000 SQUARE FEET OF AIL, 1,200,000 QUARE FEET OF OFFICE AND 000 PARKING PACES WITH ACCESSORY AMENITY SPACES AND RECREATIONAL USES; DIRECTING S14ITTAL F THE HEREIN RESOLUTION; MAKING INDING OF FACT AND STATING CONCLUSIONS LA ; PROVIDING FOR BINDING EFFECT; CONTA I A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE AND PROVIDING FOR EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, on September 1,Z, 1998, Ml�ami One Centre, Inc., ("APPLICANT"), submitted a complete Appli ation for Major. Use Special Permit for the Miami Project ("P qJECT19 pursuant to Zoning Ordinance No. 1 00, Articles 13 and 17, for the property generally bounded by Southeast 2nd Avenue on the%i, Biscayne Boulevard Way and he Miami River on the south, Bay on the east and So theast 2nd and 3rd Streets on the Miami, Florida, as Dally described on Exhibit °A" to be compri4d of a I ATTACHb`��� s CIYT COQ FETING OF. NOV 17 WS x� y -124 phased 'xed use development project; and WHE development of the PROJECT requires the issuance f a Major Use Special Permit pursuant to Article 17 of Z ing Ordinance No. 000, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of iami, Florida, as amen d; and WHEREAS, the Tanning Advisory Board, at its eeting of November 12, 1998, I m No. 5, following an adv tised public hearing, adopted Resolut'on No. PAB 72-98, RE ING APPROVAL of the PROJECT for a Ma'or Use Special P t, subject to APPLICANT complying with all onditions of a Development Order for the PROJECT, by a vote of fi a to zero (5-0); and WHEREAS, the City Commission dee it advisable and in the best interest of the general welfa of the City of Miami to issue a Major Use Special Permi D velopment Order for the PROJECT as hereinafter set forth; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT SOLVED BY THE COM117ION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. T e recitals and findings contai ed in the Preamble to this esolution are hereby adopted by eference thereto and inc orated herein as if fully set forth i this Section. Sectio 2. A Major Use Special Permit Development Orde , attached ereto as Exhibit "B" and made a part hereof, -is hereby approve subject to the conditions specified in said Development Order, per Article 17 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, as amended, _Z' � �2=i�49 for he One Miami Project (hereinafter referred to as the "PROJE ") to be developed by Miami One Centre, Irn,e-/ ("APPLI tor the property generally 2nd Avenue the west, Biscayne Bouleva River on the uth, Biscayne Bay on the 4 and 3rd Streets on the north, Miami, described on Exhibi "A", attached hereto a Section 3. PROJECT is here] construction of up to 0 hotel rooms, 1° 400,000 square feet of re ail, 1,200,000 and 7000 parking spaces 'th accessory recreational uses. Section 4. The findings hereby made with respect to the s )ounded by Sout ast Way and th Miami ;t and Sout east 2nd lorida,. s legally .made part hereof. ap oved for the f esidential units, are feet of office amenity spaces and 'fact set forth below are t PROJECT: a. The PROJECT is in co ormi with the adopted Miami Comprehensive Neighb hood Plan 1989-2000, as amended. b. The PROJECT is in ccord with the applicable CBD Zoning classification f Zoning Ordinan a No. 11000, the Zoning Ordin ce of the City of Mi mi, Florida, as amended. C. The tota PROJECT is expected to cost app ximately $1 billio and to employ approximately 1,54 workers duri g construction (FTE), and 160 annual r curring jo s. The PROJECT will generate approximately 17.4 llion annually in recurring Ad Valorem tax reven es to local units of government (1998 dollars); of thi amount, approximately $5.7 million will go to City -3�- 92-1249 ting, approximately $285,000 will go to Cit llaneous, and approximately $1 million will go/ City debt service. d. The Ci Commission further finds that: (1) the evelopment program proposed for th PROJECT will ve a favorable impact on the eco omy of the City; (2) the develo ent program proposed or the PROJECT will effici tly use publi transportation facilities; (3) any potentially averse of ects of the PROJECT will be mitigated ou compliance with the conditions of this Majo se Special Permit; (4) the development progr oposed for the PROJECT will favorably affec the n d for people.to find adequate housing, ffice and h el and retail uses reasonably acce sible to other ocations within downtown Miami, (5) the develop nt program proposed for the PROJECT will effi ently use necessary public utilities; (6) the dev opment program proposed for the ROJECT will of negatively impact the environmen and nat al resources of the City; (7) t e development program proposed for the PROJE ill not adversely affect conditions in the 02-1249 • neighborhood; 8) the development program proposed for the PROJE will not adversely affect public safety; (9) sed on the record presented and ev dence pre ented, the public welfare will be s rved by the d velopment program proposed for t e PROJECT; and (10) any potent'ally adverse effects//6f the PROJECT arising from afety and securit , fire protection and life sa ety, solid waste, heritage conservation, tre , mino ty participation and employment, and mino it contractor/ subcontractor participation will be igated through compliance with the condition of s Major Use Special Permit. Section 6. The Major se Special Pe t, as approved and amended, shall be binding on the applicants, owners and any successors in interest. Section 6. The application for Major Use Spe 'al Permit, which was submitted September 11, 1998, as amended, d is on file with the Depa tment of Planning and Development of th City of Miami, Flo ida, shall be relied upon generally or administrativ interpretations and is made a part hereof b reference. Sec on 7. This Major Use Special Permit will expire two (2) years from its effective date which is thirty (30) days after z -s`_ 02-1249 e adoption of the herein Resolution. Section 8. The City Manager is hereby directed to instru the Director of the Department of Plannin and .Developme to transmit a copy of this Resolution and at achments to the devel ers: Miami One Centre, Inc., Blue Lake anagement, 5000 Blue Lake, 150, Boca Raton, FL. 33431. Section 9. The Findings of Fact and Co lusions of Law are made with resp t to the Project as described in the Development Order for th One Miami Developm nt Project, which is attached hereto as Exhib "B" and de a part hereof by reference. Section 10. The Major a pecial Permit Development Order for the One Miami Develo Project (Exhibit "B") is hereby granted and issued. Section 11. In the ev nt that any ortion or section of this Resolution or the evelopment Order (Exhibit "B") is determined to be invalid illegal, or unconstitu ional by a court or agency of competen jurisdiction, such decisi shall in no manner affect the remaining portions of this Re lution or Development Order (Exhibit "B") which shall remain in f 1 force and effect. Section 12. This Resolution shall become effective thi v p2-1249 (30�\days after its adoptionll. PASS AND ADOPTED this 17th day of N0VtMh1,r , :�6g8, \ JOE CAROLW , In accord a with A ,iami Code Sec. 2.36,E :-ice the !� •-r•- :?w not °n�;c-�p -- r + this legis latio by signing it in the designated pis a prav,dac• ca:;; becomes eff with the e►ap&d of :en (S 0) de m the date of ComMS&C. ; regarding same, ut the Mayor exerc:ising,a mm G ATTEST: City Cleric WALTER J. FOEMAN CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CO C ALEJANDRO VIIL=LLO CITY'" MTORNEY Y43'D 41: GMM: Csk : BSS This Resolu on shall become effective as specified herein unless vetoed by the Mayr within ten days from the date it was passed and adopted. If the Mayo vetoes this Resolution, it shall became effective immediately upon ov rride of the veto by the City Commission or upon the effective date s ated herein, whichever is later. 92-1249 -7$NOW* - ONEMIAM1_ Legal Description Parcel A Alf of Tract D, lock 1, DU PONT PLAZA, according to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 50, M!, gime 11, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida ESS that portion of Tract D cribed as follows: Begin at the Northeast m Tract D for a distance of 5 along a circular curye to th 61 °26'00" for an arc distance Southerly along a circular angle of 28034'00" for an a South for a distance of 293. with the boundary lines of s thence run North for a distance of 150. feet; thence run North 00°04'07" West of 300.00 feet to the Point of Beginning, me of said Tract D and run West .94 feet to a Point of Curvature; left, having a radius of 25.00 f 26.81 feet to a Point of cu v to the left, having a ra 'us arc di ce of 149.57 feet a p 50 feet id last menti ned fo aid Tract ; thence n East for Parcel B alo the North line of ence Southwesterly a central angle of mpound Curvature; thence of 300.00 feet, a central oint of tangency; thence run ur courses being coincident a distance of 179.41 feet; ;,tftience run East for a distance of 525.36 he East line of said Tract D for a distance and being in Dade County, Florida. All of Block 3, DU PONT P according to the plat ere 50, Page 11, of the Public Re rds of Dade County, Flo a, Parcel. C Lots 1 through 8, bo inclusive, Block 2, DU PONT PLAZA, thereof as recorde in Plat Book 50, Page 11, of the Public Florida. Parcel D as recorded in Plat Book to the plat Dade County, All Block 4, DU PONT PLAZA, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat 5Y, Page 11, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. Exhibit A 02-1249 EXHIBIT "B" DEVELOPMENT ORDER ATTAC 4E14T TO RESOLUTION NO. DATE: ONE MIAMI PROJECT MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT DEVELOPMENT ORDER Let it be wn that pursuant to Articles 13 and 17 of Ordinance No. 11000, the Zoning Ordinance of the ity of Miami, Florida, as amended, he Commission of the ity of Miami, Florida, has considered i a public hearing, the issuance of a Major Use Special Permit to a comprised of a Phased Development to consist of mixed uses for a One Mia ' Project (hereinafter referred to as the "PROJECT") t be cated at the properties generally bounded by Southeast 2nd enue on the west, Biscayne Boulevard Way and the Miami River n he south, Biscayne Bay on the east and Southeast 2nd and d Stree s on the north, Miami, Florida; see legal descriptio in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and made a part hereof; sai legal descriptio is subject to any dedications, limitations, estrictions, reservations or easements of record. After du/da tion of the recommendations of the Planning Advisory after due consideration of the consist ncy of this prvelopment with the Miami Comprehe ive Neighborhhe City Commission has approved the PROJEand subjfollowing conditions approves the Major Use z B -r 02--1249 al Permit and hereby issues this Permit: PROJECT ON: The propose One Miami Project is a Phased Mixed se Project which will occupy t e properties generally bounde by Southeast 2nd Avenue on the we Biscayne Boulevard Wa and the Miami River on the south, Bisc a Bay on the eas and Southeast 2nd and 3rd Streets on the orth, Miami, Florida; see legal description in Exhibit "A", (" OJECT") . The PROJECT is located on approximately 14.19 gross acr d 8.98 net acres of land (more specifically described in Exb' 't "A", incorporated herein by reference). The remainder the ROJECT's VITAL DATA is attached hereto as Exhibit it, and i orporated herein by reference. The proposed OJECT is hereby ap roved for the construction of up to 0 hotel rooms, 1,500 resi ntial units, 400,000 square feet f retail, 1,200,000 square feet of office and 7,000 parkin spaces with accessory amenity spa es and recreational us . The P oject shall not be constructed until such time that each i ividual phase undergoes approval as a substantial modif' ation of this permit; said approvals shall require all cus omary reviews required for a Major Use Special Permit 02-1249 B r inclng the Large Scale Development Committee and the Develop ent Review Board. The mi\amende ale of uses proposed for the P/coained conform to the requof the CBD Zoning District, as in Ordinance Nthe Zoning Ordinance of the CMiami, Florida, as The existing compr allows the proposed mix ive plan future 1 intensity of uses, PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A ITS SUCCESSORS, AND/OR ASSIGNS, COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING FO DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM APPROVED use designation ING PERMIT THE APPLICANT, JO Y OR SEVERALLY, SHALL EACH HASE OF THE PROPOSED 1. Meet all /dprior building codes, \anddervteopment regulations, and other laws. 2. Prior to thef a building permite City with a list s from which approvermits must be obtato initiation of dnd the permit or apired of each. 3. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, recor a certifi copy of the development order in the Publ c Recor of Miami -Dade County that specifies that the Deve opment Order runs with the land and is binding on the 92-1249 / = B=3 pplicant, its successors, and assigns, jointly o s verally. 4. Allo the Miami Police Department to conduct a se rity survey, at the option of the Department, so as o make recommen tions concerning security measures and systems; further s t a report to the Department of P ing and Development, prior to commencement of c nstruction, demonstrating ow the Police Department reco ndations, if any, have been 'ncorporated into the PROJE security and construction plan or demonstrate to the anning Director why such recommenda 'ons are impractical. 5. Provide a letter fr the Depar ent of Fire -Rescue indicating APPLICANT'S co rdination th members of the Fire Plans Review Section of t Depa ment of Fire -Rescue for the review of the sco f the PROJECT, owner responsibility, building dev pment process and review procedures, as well as spe i 'c requirements for fire protection and life safety s stems, egress, vehicular access and water supply. 6. Provide a letter of assurance fro the Solid Waste Department that the P OJECT has address e all concerns of said Department. 7. Prepare a Minori Participation and Employmen Plan to be submitted to t e City's Director of Minority and Women Business Aff irs for review and comments, ith the understandin that the City's Minority/Women siness Affairs an Procurement Ordinance No. 10538 is a guid that the APPL must use its best efforts to follow. 8. Prpa e a Minority Contractor/Subcontractor Participatio "\\ P1eto the City's Director of Minority and Women Business Af airs for review and comment, with the understanding that 02-124 B -C �he City's Minority/Women Business Affairs and Procuremen 'nance No. 10538 is a guide that the APPLICANT must e its st efforts to follow. 9. Record i the Public Records of Miami -Dade CoXoroamandatory orida, a Declarati n of Covenants and Restrictions g that the ownership operation and maintenance of alareas and facilities ill be by the property owner property owner as ciation in perpetuity. 10. Provide the City with executed, recor a unity of title or covenant in -lieu of unity of title agreement for the subject property; said a eement shal be subject to the review and approval of the ty Atto y's Office. 11. The applicant shall provide plan or proposed sidewalk and swale area improvements prior to t e issuance of a building permit; said plans shall be s ject o review and approval by the Public Works Depar ment an the Department of Planning and Development. 12. Provide the Department f Planning and Deve pment with a temporary parking plan hich addresses construc 'on employee parking during the c nstruction period; said pl shall be subject to the re ew and approval by the Depar ent of Planning and De v lopment prior to the issuance o any building permit . 13. The applican shall retain the services of an archeological consultant who will be responsible for conducting archeolog'cal monitoring of all ground disturbing activity, as wel as the subsequent recovery of artifacts; said consu ant shall obtain a scope of work from the Miami -Dade Co y Archeologist and shall provide reports to both that a2-1249 B -s ice and the City of Miami Preservation Officer. 14. Apply for a substantial modification review and appr al for each o the phases proposed within this Major Us Special Permit; ch phase shall require approval of a design component including right-of-way improveme s, facade treatment, si age, lighting, etc.; no phase o the project shall be const cted until such time that sai approvals are obtained; said a rovals shall require all stomary reviews required for a or Use Special Pe including the Planning Advisory B rd, Large Scale De elopment Committee and the Urban Developm nt Review Board. THE CITY SHALL: Subject to payment of all/aseing le fees due, establish the effective date of this Permit rty (30) days from the date of its issuance; the idate shall constitute the commencement of the thirty ( period o appeal from the provisions of the Permit. The development program proposed for the One Miami roject by the applicant, iami One Centre, Inc., ("Applicant"), co lies with the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000, 's consistent wit the orderly development and goals of the City o Miami, and c lies with local land development regulations, and it is furt er found, pursuant to Section 1703 of Zoning Ordinance 02-1249 B-6 No.\11000 that: the development program proposed for the PROJECT will have a favorable impact on the economy of the City; and t e development program proposed for the PROJE wi efficiently use public transportat'on faci 'ties; and the de elopment program proposed for the OJECT will fav rably affect the need for peopl to find adequate ousing, office space and otel and retail uses ithin the downtown area; d the developm program proposed f the PROJECT will efficientl use necessary p is facilities; and the development pr rat will not negatively i natural resources of th the PROJECT will not safety; and the development prog a 7�ed for the PROJECT /the environment and and rsely affect public welfare will b/se ed by the(8) any potentiallrse effects mitigated thrhe conditii Special Permit ed for the public ZOJECT; and f the PROJECT will be �n of this Major Use The proposeddevelopment program does no unreasonably interfere with t achievement of the objectives o the adopted St/isite opment Plan applicable to the City of 'ami. Section 1305 of Zoning Ordinance No. 1100 the splan aspects of the PROJECT i.e., ingress d egt parking and loading, refuse and service areas, sihting, „utilities, drainage and control of 02-1249 M potent lly adverse effects generally, have been considered d will be ther considered administratively during the proce s of approving e h individual phase and issuing individual ilding permits and ce tificates of occupancy. B-8= 02-1249 a EXHIBIT "c" ON ` M I/""1M Iw MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT Project Data Sheet 1. Legalpescription: See attached Exhibit "'I" under the /Project Information. 2. Location: Parcel A is located adjace to the Intercontinental Hotel podium on a north, the Miami River on the south,Bisca a Bay on the east and Biscayne Boulevar on the west. Parcel B is rectangular in sha a and surrounded by Southeast 3r° Street on a north, Biscayne Boulevard - Way/Southea 4`" Street on the south, Biscayne Boulev rd on the east and Southeast 3 Avenue the west. Parcel C is ctangular in sha and surrounded by S east 3nd Stre on the north, Biscayne Bou vard Way/S heast a Street on the south, Southeast 'd Avenue on the east and Southe 2"d A nue on the west. Parcel D is rectangul i shape and surrounded by Southeast "d treet on the north, Southeast 3 Street on t south, Southeast 3'd Avenue on the east a S heast 2"d Avenue on the west. 3. Zoning Classification: Centrai/Susiness D4trict (CBD). 4. Lot Area: Gross Lot Area:/181-98 4.19 acres (618,116.4 sq.'f1\) Net Lot Area: acres (391,168.8 sq, ft. 5. Density: Units Per Acre Pe itted: 1000 units/acre. Units Per Acre P ovided: Parcel A - 300 dwelling units; and 0 hotel rooms(equiv. 150 dwelling units)/3.04 net Cres = 148 units per acre. Parcel B - 1,200 dwelling units/2.46 net acr = 488 units per acre. Parcels A & B - 1,500/ dwelling units and 300 hotel rooms (equiv. 150 dwelling units)/5.5 net acres = 300 units per acre. 92-1249 6. Fibor Area Ratio 7. Loading Berths: 8. Height Permitted\ 9. . Building Footprint: 10. Parking Spaces: Handicapped spaces: ONIMIAMI_ PROJECT DATA SHEET (Cont) Unlimited. To be provided at tim/f,t ubstantial modification to the MUSP Unlimited. To be provided at timubstantial modification to the MUSP N�oimum/450 oomHotel. s ces maximum/225 Conference nter 100,000 sq. ft. No minimu 01100 spaces maximum/100 300 ndominium un No inimum / 600 spa maximum / 600 p vided. 1,200 Apartment units. No minimum / 2400 spaces maxim 11500 provided. 1,200,000 sq. ft. of Office 1200 minimum / 2000 maximum / 2000 provided. 400,000 sq. ft. of Retail. No minimum / 1333 maximum 1900 provided. Commercial Parking No minimum / no maximum / 1,675 provided. The percentage of handicap spaces - provided will be as defined by the Florida Accessibility Code. a2-1249 ONE M IAMI_ 11. Open Space: To be provided at t)yfie of the substantial modification to the MU P. 12. Setbacks: Adjacent to all stre s --,5 feet. Interior - zero fe . ar - zero fee . MjAMI/PAR00AA7 C31AMeA1!.000JWM" 02-1249 Exhibit "E" Prepared By: Adrienne Pardo, Esq. Greenberg, Traurig, P.A. 1221 Brickell Avenue Miami, Florida 33131 AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT (the "Agreement") is made and entered into as of this day of February, 2002, by and between MIAMI ONE CENTRE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Florida limited partnership ("One Miami"), whose address is , and the CITY OF MIAMI, a municipal corporation of the State of Florida ("City"), whose address is 444 S.W. 4h Street, Miami, Florida 33128. RECITALS: WHEREAS, One Miami is the fee simple owner of that certain parcel of land located in Miami -Dade County, Florida, more particularly described in Exhibit A attached hereto (the "One Miami Property"); WHEREAS, the City is the fee simple owner of those certain submerged lands lying adjacent to and abutting the One Miami Property (the "City Property"); WHEREAS, One Miami filed a conditional Letter of Map Revision (the "CLOMR Amendment") request with the Federal Emergency Management Agency ("FEMA") to amend the flood elevation on the Property from VE with a BFE of twelve (12) and thirteen (13) feet NGVD to AE with a BFE of twelve (12) feet NGVD. FEMA has approved the CLOMR Amendment subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions; WHEREAS, FEMA has requested that as a condition precedent to the granting of the CLOMR Amendment, One Miami install and maintain, repair and replace, as necessary, articulated concrete scour protection mats (the "Scour Mats") on the City Property along the existing seawall to provide additional protection to the existing bulkhead; WHEREAS, One Miami will enter into that certain Joint Application (the "Application") for a Class I Coastal Construction Permit to be submitted to the Department of Environmental Resource Management ("DERM") for the installation of the Scour Mats (the "Permit"); WHEREAS, DERM is requiring that the City execute the Application as the owner of the adjacent submerged lands; and WHEREAS, the City is willing to execute the Application, provided that One Miami executes this Agreement which provides that One Miami shall (i) be responsible for the - 1- 02-1249 installation, maintenance, repair and replacement of the Scour Mats in compliance with any and all Permit requirements, (ii) convey the Scour Mats to the City, (iii) indemnify and hold harmless the City from any losses arising in connection with the installation, maintenance, repair and replacement of the Scour Mats and (iv) obtain and maintain insurance as reasonably required by the City's risk management department. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of Ten and No/100 Dollars ($10.00) and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, One Miami and the City hereby agree that the foregoing recitals are true and correct and further agree as follows: 1. Agreement to Execute Application. One Miami and the City hereby agree that within ten (10) days after the full execution of this Agreement, One Miami and the City shall each execute the Application. 2. Installation Maintenance Repair and Replacement of Scour Mats. One Miami shall have the obligation to install, maintain, repair and replace the Scour Mats to the extent necessary to insure the uninterrupted use of the Scour Mats for the purposes set forth herein, and shall pay all costs and expenses in connection therewith. 3. Grant of Easement. The City hereby grants a perpetual and non-exclusive easement in favor of One Miami, its successors and assigns to enter in, over and upon the City Property to install, maintain, repair and replace the Scour Mats. 4. Conveyance of Scour Mats to the City. Within thirty (30) days after the installation of the Scour Mats, One Miami shall convey the Scour Mats to the City. Upon such conveyance and acceptance of same by the City, One Miami shall continue to be responsible for the maintenance, repair and replacement of the Scour Mats to the extent necessary to insure the uninterrupted use of the Scour Mats for the purposes set forth herein. Attached hereto as Exhibit B is the form of Bill of Sale by which One Miami shall convey the Scour Mats to the City. 5. Insurance. Prior to commencing the installation of the Scour Mats, One Miami shall provide the City with evidence of general liability insurance in such amounts as may be reasonably required by the City's risk management department from time to time, naming the City as an additional insured with respect to any activity carried on under the terms of the Agreement. 6. Indemnification. One Miami hereby agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City, its officers and employees from and against any and all liabilities, damages, claims, costs or expenses whatsoever (including all reasonable attorneys' fees and costs whether suit be brought or any appeals be taken therefrom), arising from, growing out of or in connection with the installation, maintenance, repair and replacement of the Scour Mats, unless such liabilities, damages, claims, costs or expenses arises from the gross negligence or willful misconduct of the City. - 2- 02--1249 7. Compliance With Laws. One Miami and the City shall at all times observe in the use of the Scour Mats all applicable municipal, state and federal laws, ordinances, codes, statutes, rules and regulations. 8. Miscellaneous. (a) Enforcement. The provisions of this Agreement may be enforced by all appropriate actions at law and in equity by the fee simple owners from time to time of the Property, with the prevailing party in any such action entitled to reimbursement of reasonable attorneys' fees and costs incurred at trial and all appellate levels. (b) Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts and by the separate parties hereto in separate counterparts, each of which when taken together shall be deemed to be one and the same instrument. (c) Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the fee owners from time to time of the One Miami Property, the City Property and their respective successors and assigns. (d) Construction. The section headings contained in this Agreement are for reference purposes only and shall not affect the meaning or interpretation hereof. All of the parties to this Agreement have participated fully in the negotiation of this Agreement, and accordingly, this Agreement shall not be more strictly construed against any one of the parties hereto. In construing this Agreement, the singular shall be held to include the plural, the plural shall be held to include the singular, and reference to any particular gender shall be held to include every other and all genders. (e) Notices. Any and all notices required or desired to be given hereunder shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been duly given when delivered by hand (including recognized overnight courier service, such as Federal Express) or three (3) business days after deposit in the United States mail, by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid, and addressed to the recipient at the address for such party set forth in the introductory paragraph to this Agreement (or to such other address as any party hereunder shall hereafter specify to the other in writing). (f) Severability. In the event any term or provision of this Agreement is determined by appropriate judicial authority to be illegal or otherwise invalid, such provision shall be given its nearest legal meaning or be construed as deleted as such authority determines, and the remainder of this Agreement shall be construed in full force and effect. (g) Exhibits. All of the Exhibits attached to this Agreement are incorporated in, and made a part of, this Agreement. - 3- a2-1249 9. Amendments; Termination. This Agreement may not be amended, modified or terminated except by written agreement of the parties hereto and the holders of any mortgages of record encumbering the One Miami Property; provided, however, that with respect to any portion of the One Miami Property which has been submitted to condominium form of ownership, the instrument of amendment or termination shall be executed solely by the condominium association in lieu of the individual condominium owners and their mortgagees. Further, no modification or amendment shall be effective unless in writing and recorded in the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida. 10. Covenants Running with the Land. It is intended that the terms, conditions, covenants, rights, obligations and burdens set forth in this Agreement shall run with the title to the One Miami Property and the City Property. 11. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and supercedes all prior agreements, understandings and arrangements, both oral and written, between the parties with respect thereto. 12. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with, and governed by, the laws of the State of Florida. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the day and near first above written. Signed, sealed and delivered in the MIAMI ONE CENTRE LIMITED presence of these witnesses: PARTNERSHIP, a Florida limited partnership By: Miami One Centre, Inc., a Florida corporation, General Partner Print Name: By. Name: Title: Print Name: Print Name: Print Name: CITY OF MIAMI, a municipal corporation of the State of Florida By: _ Name: Title: - 4- 02-1249 _ STATE OF FLORIDA ) )SS: COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2002 by , as of Miami One Centre, Inc., a Florida corporation which is the general partner of MIAMI ONE CENTRE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Florida limited partnership, on behalf of the corporation and the partnership. He/she personally appeared before me, is personally known to me or produced as identification. [NOTARIAL SEAL] STATE OF FLORIDA ) )SS: COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE ) Notary: Print Name: Notary Public, State of Florida My commission expires: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2002 by , as of CITY OF MIAMI, a municipal corporation of the State of Florida, on behalf of the corporation. He/she personally appeared before me, is personally known to me or produced as identification. [NOTARIAL SEAL] Notary: Print Name: Notary Public, State of _ My commission expires: - 5- a2-1249 EXHIBIT "A" Legal Description of Property All of Tract A, ONE MIAMI PARCEL A, recorded in Plat Book 155 at Page 80, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida. - 6- 02-1249 EXHIBIT "B" Form of Bill of Sale MIAMI ONE CENTRE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Florida limited partnership ("Miami One"), for and in consideration of the sum of Ten and No/100 Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, does hereby grant, bargain and sell to the CITY OF MIAMI, a municipal corporation of the State of Florida (the "City") those certain articulated concrete scour protection mats which have been installed upon certain submerged lands owned by the City adjacent to the real property more particularly described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto along the existing seawall (the "Scour Mats"). TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the same unto the City forever. AND the Scour Mats are sold "As -Is", and the Seller specifically disclaims and excludes any and all express or implied warranties of any nature whatsoever, including without limitation any implied warranty of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. AND Miami One hereby covenants to and with the City of Miami that Miami One is the lawful owner of the Scour Mats; that the Scour Mats are free from all liens and encumbrances; that Miami One has good right to sell the Scour Mats as aforesaid. EXECUTED this day of Signed, Sealed and Delivered in the presence of: Print Name: Print Name: 2002. MIAMI ONE CENTRE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Florida limited partnership By: Miami One Centre, Inc., a Florida corporation, General Partner 7 - By:_ Name: Title: 92-1249 STATE OF FLORIDA ) )SS: COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2002 by , as of Miami One Centre, Inc., a Florida corporation which is the general partner of MIAMI ONE CENTRE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Florida limited partnership, on behalf of the corporation and the partnership. He/she personally appeared before me, is personally known to me or produced as identification. [NOTARIAL SEAL] \\MIA-SRVO 1 \GOLDMANJ\ I370726v02\tdq#02!.DOC\2/20/02 Notary: Print Name: Notary Public, State of _ My commission expires: — 8— a2-1249 ARTICLE II. Project Description A. Zoning Ordinance No. 11000 1. Section 1304.2.1 2. Section 1702.2.1 3. Section 1702.2.2 4. Section 1702:2.3 Subm €tted fA tlublic� re co rix i� itern Prisd,lla A. City Clerk Application Forms; Supplementary Materials General Report Major Use Special Permit Concept Plan Development Impact Study 02-1,249 ONE MIAMI TABLE OF CONTENTS ARTICLE I. Project Information A. Introduction B. Application for a Major Use Special Permit C. Phased Project Request D. Request for Designation of Retail Specialty Center E. Disclosure of Ownership F. Ownership Affidavit G. Directory of Project Principals H. City of Miami Zoning Atlas Map, Page 36 I. City of Miami Future Land Use Map J. Aerial and Location Map K. Ownership List L. Project Data Sheet and Summary M. Summary of Approvals ARTICLE II. Project Description A. Zoning Ordinance No. 11000 1. Section 1304.2.1 2. Section 1702.2.1 3. Section 1702.2.2 4. Section 1702:2.3 Subm €tted fA tlublic� re co rix i� itern Prisd,lla A. City Clerk Application Forms; Supplementary Materials General Report Major Use Special Permit Concept Plan Development Impact Study 02-1,249 ARTICLE III. Supporting Documents Tab 1 Survey Tab 2 Site Plan gtern Tab 3 Traffic Impact Analysis City Clerk Tab 4 Site Utility Study Tab 5 Economic Impact Study Tab 6 Minority Construction Employment Plan Tab 7 Architectural and Landscape Drawings Tab 8 Archeological and Historical Assessment 372005 92=1249 u� u b' City Cierk 02-00 Irr.4-o public ONE MIAMI "° iaf ec �� �� ` _ ri � ., iter INTRODUCTION Prisc hia A. _g �E��wW�P1 City Cierk The proposed development consists of a total of three parcels, two of which are located along S.E. 4' Street between S.E.2' Avepue and Biscayne Boulevard and one parcel located on S.E.2nd Avenue between S.E. 2"d and 3`d Avenues (the "Property"). The Property falls within the Downtown Miami Development of Regional Impact (the "DRI"). The Property is designated CBD Commercial Business District in the City of Miami Future Land Use Map (the "Map") and the Official Zoning Atlas (the "Atlas"). The proposed development is permitted by the DRI and is consistent with the Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan and is a permitted use of the CBD zoning district. The Property was originally part of the already permitted One Miami Major Use Special Permit (the "Original MUSP"), approved under Resolution No. 98-1151 (the "Resolution"). The Resolution approved 1,500 dwelling units, 1,200,000 square feet of office development, 400,000 square feet of retail development, and 7,000 parking spaces. A portion of the Original MUSP was bifurcated and recently received approval for a Substantial . Modification to the Original MUSP under Resolution No. 02-858, which permits development of 900 dwelling units, 28,000 square feet of office, and 17,000 square feet of retail development. The applicant intends "to develop the Property as a mixed-use residential and commercial development which will create a new pedestrian -friendly, downtown neighborhood that provides housing, retail, entertainment, and fitness amenities to the project's residents, downtown area workers, tourists staying in the vicinity, and residents of the nearby Brickell area. To achieve this end, the project consists of 1,500 dwelling units in three towers, a four- story entertainment complex with a 16 -screen movie theatre, approximately 157,325 square feet of additional multilevel retail within the four buildings, a 9,000 square foot office component, and 4,284 parking spaces to accommodate all proposed uses as well as to replace the ground -level spaces currently on the vacant Property. This proposed development will have a significantly lesser impact than the Original MUSP. The project incorporates innovative urban design techniques to emphasize the neighborhood character of the development. These include extra wide sidewalks, lush greenery along all streets, sidewalk courtyards, and covered loggias. Providing a central meeting place for pedestrians, a large open-air plaza adjacent to the entertainment complex will afford connectivity and integration with the existing First Union Bank plaza. Specifically for the use and enjoyment of residents, rooftop recreation areas complete with state-of-the-art infinity edge pools and extensive landscaping will provide a peaceful setting high atop the busy urban setting below. 02-1249 Similarly, imaginative design has been used to buffer the infrastructure of the buildings from public view. To wit, the facades of all parking levels are designed to resemble habitable space, thereby shielding them from motorists and occupants of adjacent buildings. Furthermore, loft style apartments and condominiums situated on parking levels will provide increased buffering of garages along S.E. 4' Street, Biscayne Boulevard, and a portion of S.E. 2`d Avenue. All loading spaces have been located internally to the site and an underground tunnel will service the entertainment complex so as to avoid aesthetic detraction and traffic disruption. Lastly, distinctive architectural elements on the rooftops of the residential towers have been designed both to identify the project as a skyline landmark and ingeniously shield all rooftop• mechanical equipment from view. Once completed, the proposed development will be a significant asset to the City of Miami that will transform the perception of downtown from merely a place where people work to a place where people live and play as well. Submitted Into the {public record incr�� e , _n with item Pr -it orf %ri oy Priscilla A. «c iso o`son' City Clerk 02 -42 :9 PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT HEARING BOARDS DIVISION 444 SW 2nd Avenue, 71h Floor • Miami, Florida 33130 Telephone 305-416-1480 • Fax 305416-203$dbmltted Into the public record in connc: m with APPLICATION FOR item ft -II o Priscilla A. ` i 11 son MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT City Clerk IT IS INTENDED THAT MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMITS BE REQUIRED WHERE SPECIFIED USES AND/OR OCCUPANCIES INVOLVE MATTERS DEEMED TO BE OF CITYWIDE OR AREA -WIDE IMPORTANCE. THE CITY COMMISSION SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR DETERMINATIONS ON APPLICATIONS FOR MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMITS. (SEE ARTICLE 17 OF ORDINANCE 11000, AS AMENDED, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA.) THE DIRECTOR OF THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING SHALL MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS ON ALL APPLICATIONS FOR MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMITS AND FOR ANY AMENDMENTS THERETO AND SHALL TRANSMIT SAID APPLICATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO THF PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD FOR ITS RECOMMENDATIONS AND MAY MAKE REFERRALS TO OTHER AGENCIES, BODIES, OR OFFICERS FOR REVIEW, ANALYSIS, AND/OR TECHNICAL FINDINGS AND DETERMINATIONS AND REPORTS THEREON. (SEE SECTION 1301.4 OF ORDINANCE 11000, AS AMENDED, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA.) ANY PERSON WHO RECEIVES COMPENSATION, REMUNERATION OR EXPENSES FOR CONDUCTING LOBBYING ACTIVITIES TO REGISTER AS A LOBBYIST WITH THE CITY CLERK, PRIOR TO ENGAGING IN LOBBYING ACTIVITIES BEFORE CITY STAFF, BOARDS, COMMITTEES AND THE CITY COMMISSION. A COPY OF SAID ORDINANCE IS AVAILABLE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK (MIAMI CITY HALL), LOCATED AT 3500 PAN AMERICAN DRIVE, MIAMI, FLORIDA, 33133. APPLICANTS ARE RESPONSIBLE, IF NEEDED, TO BRING AN INTERPRETER FOR THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE TO ANY PRESENTATION BEFORE CITY BOARDS, COMMITTEES AND THE CITY COMMISSION. POWER OF ATTORNEY WILL BE REQUIRED IF NEITHER APPLICANT OR LEGAL COUNSEL REPRESENTING THE APPLICANT EXECUTE THE APPLICATION OR DESIRE TO MAKE A PRESENTATION BEFORE CITY BOARDS, COMMITTEES AND THE CITY COMMISSION. I, Gilberto Pastoriza, Esq., on behalf of Ricardo Glas as Trustee who is the contract purchaser of the subject property, hereby apply to the Director of the Planning and Zoning Department of the City of Miami for approval of a Major Use Special Permit under the provisions of Article 17 of the City of Miami Zoning Ordinance. Property Address: 300 S.E. 31 Street; 200 S.E. 3nd Street- 200 S.E. 2nd Street Nature of proposed use (be specific): mixed-use residential/commercial/entertainment/office Two 11x17" original current surveys and one 24x36" original survey, prepared by a State of Florida Registered Land Surveyor within six months from the date of application. 2. Two 11x17" original plans and one 24x36" original plan, signed and sealed by a State of Florida Registered Architect or Engineer showing property boundaries, existing (if any) and proposed structure(s), parking, landscaping, etc.; building elevations and dimensions and computations of lot area and building spacing. 3. Plans need to be stamped by the Hearing Boards Division first and then signed by Public Works, Zoning and Planning prior to submission of application. Rev. 06/04/02 ='- '� 2 49 Submitted Into the public record in connection item PZ -i( on 11 19..oy- Priscilla A. Thorr son 4. Affidavit and disclosure of ownership of subject property and disclosure of interest QV Clerk attached forms). 5. Certified list of owners of real estate within a 500 -feet radius from the outside boundary of property (see pages 5 and 6). 6. At least two photographs that show the entire property (land and improvements). 7. Maps showing the existing zoning designation and the adopted comprehensive plan designation for areas on and around the property: 8. General location map showing relation to the site or activity to major streets, schools, existing utilities, shopping areas, important physical features in and adjoining the project, and the like. 9. Concept Plan: a) Site plan and relevant information per Section 1304.2.1d -h in Zoning Ordinance 11000, as amended. b) Relationships to surrounding existing and proposed uses and activities, systems and facilities, per Section 1702.2.2a in Zoning Ordinance 11000, as amended. c) How concept affects existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan principles and designations; tabulation of any required variances, special permits, changes of zoning or exemptions, per Section 1702.2.2b in Zoning Ordinance 11000, as amended. 10. Developmental Impact Study (an application for development approval for a Development of Regional Impact may substitute). 11. Other (specify and attach cover letter explaining why any document you are attaching is pertinent to this application). 12. An 8 Y2 x 11" copy of all exhibits that will be presented at the hearing. 13. Twenty-five (25) "Major Use Special Permit" books containing the above information. If this project requires Zoning Board approval, a total of thirty-five (35) books will be required. 14. Cost of processing according to the City Code: a) $ 46,675.00 , for the Major Use Special Permit b) Additional fee of $ 0 , for any required special permits, changes of zoning or variances. c) Total Fee: $ _ 46,675.00 15. Is the property within the boundaries of a historic site, historic district or archeological zone designated pursuant to Chapter 23 of the Miami City Code? YES, the applicant is requesting a Certificate of Appropriateness for ground disturbing activity in an Archaeological Conservation Area pursuant to Section 23-5(a), City of Miami Code. Support for this request is provided by An Architectural and Historical Assessment of Miami One -Parcels, Miami, Florida prepared by Robert S. Carr, Mark Lance, Victor Longo, and Stephanie Faulkner of Archaeological and Historical Conservancy, Inc., a copy of which is included under Tab 8 in Article III of the application booklet. Rev. 06/04/02 2 02-1249 16. Is the property within the boundaries of an Environmental Preservation District designated pursuant to Chapter 17 of the Miami City Code? NO 17. What is the purpose of this Major Use Special Permit? To permit a mixed-use residential/commercial/parking development consisting of 1500 residential units, approximately 220,000 square feet of retail, 9,000 square feet of office, and approximately 4,284 parking Signature Name Gilberto Pastoriza Address 2665 South Bayshore Drive Suite 420 Telephone (305)854-0800 Date September 3, 2002 Submitted Into the public �� �,wi record in donne�aMeitem PZ -1► o�1�z- Priscilla A. Thompson City Clerk Rev. 06/04102 3 v�2-249 STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 20 o Z , by personally known to me or who has produced identification and who did (did not) take an oath. (Stamp) STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE Submitted Into the rec off`"d -� con nz 3ctkc. s' 11 item j? , t 1 01111 �V 0 >- Priscilla riscilla A. Tho'e at':sbn City Clerk 5'^- day of .SP„ __mho isanan individual as Signature Viv Poe COMMISSION NUMBER DD110042 ��Q MY cOMMISSION EXPIRES OF Fl -(:;p DEC. 28.2002 The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 20 , by a day of corporation, on behalf of the corporation. He/She is personally known to me or has produced as identification and who did (did not) take an oath. (Stamp) STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE Signature The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20 , by partner (or agent) on behalf of I a partnership. He/She is personally known to me or who has produced as identification and who did (did not) take an oath. (Stamp) Signature Rev. 06/04/02• 4 MITCHELL A. BIERMAN NINA L. BONISKE JAMIE ALAN COLE EDWARD G. GUEDES STEPHEN J. HELFMAN GILBERTO PASTORIZA JOSEPH H. SEROTA NANCY E. STROUD RICHARD JAY WEISS DAVID M. WOLPIN STEVEN W. ZELKOWITZ THOMAS J. ANSBRO* LILLIAN ARANGO DE LA HOZ* ALISON S. BIELER MITCHELL J. BURNSTEIN ELAINE M. COHEN STEPHANIE DEUTSCH' DOUGLAS R. GONZALES WEYSS SEB*OTA HELFMAN PASTORIZA & GUEDES, P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW MIAMI-DADE OFFICE 2665 SOUTH BAYSHORE DRIVE SUITE 420 MIAMI, FLORIDA 33133 TELEPHONE (305) 854-0800 TELECOPIER (305) 854-2323 WWW.WSH-FLAII,AW.COM BROWARD OFFICE 3107 STIRLING ROAD, SUITE 300 FORT LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA 33312 TELEPHONE (954) 763-4242 • TELECOPIER (954) 764-7770 VIA HAND DELIVERY Ms. Lourdes Slazyk City of Miami Department of Planning & Development 444 S.W. 2nd Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami, Florida 33130 'OF COUNSEL September 5, 2002 Re: Request for Phased Project Dear Ms. Slazyk: JOHN R. HERIN, JR. CHRISTOPHER F. KURTZ HARRIET R. LEWIS* PETER A. LICHTMAN KAREN LIEBERMAN' MATTHEW H. MANDEL BERNARD S. MANDLER' ALEXANDER L. PALE NZU ELA-MAU RI MICHAEL S. POPOK* ANTHONY L. RECTO GARY I. RESNICK* MARK A. ROTHENBERG SCOTT A. ROBIN DANA J. SCHINDLER GAIL D. SEROTA* ARI C. SHAPIRO JEFFREY P. SHEFFEL FRANCINE THOMAS STEELMAN SUSAN L. TREVARTHEN CARMENI.TUGENDER Submitted Into tt°^ public rew O d ccnne C.,` with item _PZ w ►t c �►.t_,'►� Prisvi 1, 1,a A `i 1 ort City Clerk Our firm represents Ricardo Glas, Trustee ("Glas"). Glas is the contract purchaser of the property which is the subject of an application for Modification to a previously approved Major Use Special Permit which accompanies this request. The following information is provided in support of this request. Section 2502 of the City's Zoning Ordinance 11000 defines phase project as follows: "A phased project is one which, due to its magnitude, has to be developed in stages. Such project shall contain a minimum of three (3) acres of land. Any project which meets such requisite shall establish the maximum development capacity for the subject property. At the time of the qualification by the director of the planning, building and zoning department, as required below, such projects shall be owned by a single entity or subsidiaries of one (1) entity and may occupy contiguous lands, separated only by streets or alleys, and will be considered as one (1) project for the purpose of calculating all zoning requirements. Individual phases of such projects which reach the MUSP 0-1249 Ms. Lourdes Slazyk September 5, 2002 Page 2 Submitted Into the Iia, -lic record is connectiGC item cin —��.1_19�_oY Priscilla A. Th©mipson City Clerk thresholds as established in article 17, shall also comply with all the conditions contained in section 1701(11)." A phased project must be qualified by the director of the planning, building and zoning department, at the written request of the property owner(s). The recipient of this qualification shall be responsible for the distribution of development rights within the boundaries of the subject property, subject to the limitations of this Zoning Ordinance." The property in question is described in the attached Exhibit "A" (the "Property") and consists of approximately 5.94 gross acres. The Property consists of two parcels located along S.E. 4' Street between S.E.2nd Avenues and Biscayne Boulevard ("Parcel B" and "Parcel C") and one parcel located on S.E.2nd Avenue between S.E. 2' and 3rd Avenues ("Parcel D"). MDM has an option to purchase the Property. Parcels B, C, and D are contiguous to each other. The proposed mixed-use project (the "Project") consists of three residential towers providing 1,500 dwelling units, parking, ground and second level retail (the "Residential Towers", collectively); a four-story entertainment complex with a 16 -screen movie theatre (the "Entertainment Complex"); and a multilevel parking garage building with 16,745 square feet of retail (the "Parking Garage"). The Residential Towers include a 39 -story condominium on Parcel B, a 42-st6ry apartment building on Parcel C, and a 72 -story apartment tower on Parcel D ("Parcel B Tower", "Parcel C Tower", ' and "Parcel D Tower", respectively). The Residential Towers, Entertainment Complex, and Parking Garage shall be collectively referred to as the "Project". MDM intends to develop the Project in phases. The project will be developed as one unified site in three phases of development. Phase I consists of the Parking Garage. Once finished, the Parking Garage will replace the parking currently existing on the Property's vacant lots as well as provide parking for construction employees working on the development. Phase II will consist of the Parcel B Tower, Entertainment Complex, and the Parcel C Tower. Lastly, Phase III will consist of the Parcel D Tower. Besides being contiguous to each other, the various phases: a. Will be treated as one site with a consistent. streetscape and similar landscaping throughout; and b. Will be interconnected by covered loggias, wide sidewalks, parking and loading facilities. WEISS SEROTA HELFMAN 0-1V249 PASTORIZA & GUEDES, P.A. Ms. Lourdes Slazyk September 5, 2002 Page 3 We believe that for the reasons stated in this letter, the Project meets the City's requirements for a phased project and accordingly request that you approve the Project as a phased project. We look forward to your approval of this request. Please do not hesitate to call me if you have any questions or require additional information. GP/ms 372005 Submitted Into the rylic Enclosure record in items P2 -I1 cc: Tim Weller Priscilla A. Thom, mon Bruce Brosch City Clerk Stephen J. Helfman WEISS SEROTA HELFMAN1j:. `�3 249 PASTORIZA & GUEDES, P.A. i� WE,.SS SEROTA HELFMAN PAST013IZA & GuEDES, P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW MITCHELL A. BIERMAN MIAMI-DADE OFFICE NINA L.BONISKE 2665 SOUTH BAYSHORE DRIVE JAMIE ALAN COLE SUITE 420 EDWARD G. GUEDES FORT LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA 33312 STEPHEN J. HELFMAN MIAMI, FLORIDA 33133 GILBERTO PASTORIZA JOSEPH H. SEROTA - NANCY E. STROUD - RICHARD JAY WEISS TELEPHONE (305) 854-0800 DAVID M. WOLPIN TELECOPIER (305) 854-2323 STEVEN W. ZELKOWITZ WWW.WSM-FLAI.AW.COM September 5, 2002 VIA HAND DELIVERY Ms. Lourdes Slazyk City of Miami Department of Planning & Development 444 S.W. 2nd Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami, Florida 33130 JOHN R. HERIN, JR. CHRISTOPHER F. KURTZ HARRIET R. LEWIS* PETER A. LICHTMAN KAREN LIEBERMAN• MATTHEW H. MANDEL BERNARD S. MANDLER• ALEXANDER L. PALENZUELA-MAURI MICHAEL S. POPOK• ANTHONY L. RECIO GARY I. RESNICK• MARK A. ROTHENBERG -SCOTT A. ROBIN DANA J. SCHINDLER GAIL D. SEROTA• ARI C. SHAPIRO JEFFREY P. SHEFFEL FRANCINE THOMAS STEELMAN SUSAN L. TREVARTHEN CARMENI.TUGENDER U, s itlor� Inti s the I�` ?ic 4 item P2-tt ori�► _q�F?' Priscilla A. Thos a :. �)n LL City Clerk Re: Request for Retail Specialty Center Designation for One Miami Project Dear Ms. Slazyk: Our firm represents Ricardo Glas, Trustee ("Glas"). Glas is the contract purchaser of the property which is the subject of an application for Modification to a previously approved Major Use Special Permit to allow the proposed development (the "Project") which accompanies this request. The following information is provided in support of this request. Section 4-2 of the City's Code defines Retail Specialty Center as follows: "The retail component of a multiuse development, with a minimum of 50,000 square feet of net leasable area; such retail component to contain a mixture of retail shops and eating places which may include, by way of example and not limitation: retail shops selling apparel, furniture, men's or women's accessories or specialty gifts and such retail shops as pharmacies, newsstands, bookstores, high- tech or photography stores, flower or produce marts, arts and crafts shops or bakeries, and eating places such as restaurants, cafes, delicatessens, gourmet 02--1249 BROWARD OFFICE THOMAS J. ANSBRO• 3107 STIRLING ROAD, SUITE 300 LILLIAN ARANGO DE LA HOZ' FORT LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA 33312 ALISON S. BIELER TELEPHONE (954) 763-4242 • 7ELECOPIER (954) 764-7770 MITCHELL J. BURNSTEIN ELAINE M. COHEN - STEPHANIE DEUTSCH• DOUGLAS R. GONZALES *OF COUNSEL September 5, 2002 VIA HAND DELIVERY Ms. Lourdes Slazyk City of Miami Department of Planning & Development 444 S.W. 2nd Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami, Florida 33130 JOHN R. HERIN, JR. CHRISTOPHER F. KURTZ HARRIET R. LEWIS* PETER A. LICHTMAN KAREN LIEBERMAN• MATTHEW H. MANDEL BERNARD S. MANDLER• ALEXANDER L. PALENZUELA-MAURI MICHAEL S. POPOK• ANTHONY L. RECIO GARY I. RESNICK• MARK A. ROTHENBERG -SCOTT A. ROBIN DANA J. SCHINDLER GAIL D. SEROTA• ARI C. SHAPIRO JEFFREY P. SHEFFEL FRANCINE THOMAS STEELMAN SUSAN L. TREVARTHEN CARMENI.TUGENDER U, s itlor� Inti s the I�` ?ic 4 item P2-tt ori�► _q�F?' Priscilla A. Thos a :. �)n LL City Clerk Re: Request for Retail Specialty Center Designation for One Miami Project Dear Ms. Slazyk: Our firm represents Ricardo Glas, Trustee ("Glas"). Glas is the contract purchaser of the property which is the subject of an application for Modification to a previously approved Major Use Special Permit to allow the proposed development (the "Project") which accompanies this request. The following information is provided in support of this request. Section 4-2 of the City's Code defines Retail Specialty Center as follows: "The retail component of a multiuse development, with a minimum of 50,000 square feet of net leasable area; such retail component to contain a mixture of retail shops and eating places which may include, by way of example and not limitation: retail shops selling apparel, furniture, men's or women's accessories or specialty gifts and such retail shops as pharmacies, newsstands, bookstores, high- tech or photography stores, flower or produce marts, arts and crafts shops or bakeries, and eating places such as restaurants, cafes, delicatessens, gourmet 02--1249 Ms. Lourdes Slazyk September 5, 2002 Page 2 Submitted Into the public record in connection fin's item AlSon 1s. oy PrisGilla A. "I"'Inompson City Aeric shops or fast food services. For purposes of this section the term "multiuse development" shall mean any development with: 1) Approval for retail use and at least one of the following types of uses: - hotel, residential, movie theater, or office use; 2) A unified plan of development which shall include, but not be limited to, plans providing for the different uses in the development to be physically integrated through direct access from one to the other; 3) Parking provided by an on-site enclosed garage; and 4) All project uses under common management." Glas is requesting that the proposed retail/entertainment center (the "Center") located on the northeast corner of S.E. a Street and S.E. P Avenue be designated a Retail Specialty Center pursuant to Chapter 4 of the City's Code. The Center consists of 106,150 square feet of retail space and will include a 16 -screen movie theater. The Center meets the City of Miami's requirements for a Retail Specialty Center in the following ways: a) The Center will provide- 106,150 square feet of net leasable area containing a mixture of retail shops and eating places, which far exceeds the 50,000 square feet of -retail required by the Code; b) In addition to the retail component, the Center includes movie theater uses, therefore qualifying as a "multiuse development"; C) All buildings of the Project are integrated via consistent streetscapes, pedestrian -friendly wide sidewalks, and covered loggias; d) Parking for the various uses of the Project will be contained entirely within the Project; and e) All Project uses will be under common management. We believe that for the reasons stated in this letter, the Project meets the City's requirements for a Retail Specialty Center and accordingly request that you approve the Project as a Retail Specialty Center. WEISS SEROTA HELFMAN PASTORIZA & GUEDES, P.A. 0 2_ 12 4 9 Ms. Lourdes Slazyk September -5, 2002 Page 3 Submitted Into the public record in conner, Jon item , �� Priscilla A. � City `��erk We look forward to your approval of this request. Please do not hesitate to call me if you have any questions or require additional information. Very Gilberto Pastoriza GP/ms 372005 cc: Tim Weller Bruce Brosch Stephen J. Helfman WEISS SEROTA HELFMAN PASTORIZA & GUEDES, P.A. 11 np DISCLOSURE OF OWNERSHIP 1. Legal description and street address of subject real property: See attached Exhibit "A° Submitted Into the public r�;cx r� ,n �::,on ezc lon `:m o iter PZ -It _c�a t 4as- Pri dila A.T hon ,00n City Clerk 2. Owner(s) of subject real property and percentage of ownership. Note: The Code of the City of Miami requires disclosure of all parties having a financial interest, either direct or indirect, in the subject matter of a presentation, request or petition to the City Commission. Accordingly, question #2 requires disclosure of shareholders of corporations, beneficiaries of trusts, and/or any other interested parties, together with their addresses and proportionate interest. Miami One Centre Limited Partnership General Partner: Miami One Centre, Inc. 5900 Blue Lake Drive Suite 150 Boca Raton, FL 33431 Miami One Centre, Inc. is owned as follows: Lawrence J. DeGeorge Morris L. Stoltz, II Ned L. Siegel Limited Partners: Miami One Holdco, Ltd. 140 Intracoastal Pointe Drive Suite 410 Jupiter, Florida 33477 1% Ownership Interest 331/3% 331/3% 331/3% 33% Ownership Interest Miami One Holdco, Ltd. Is owned by: Lawrence J. DeGeorge 100% NLS Miami Partners 5000 Blue Lake Drive Suite 150 Boca Raton, Florida 33431 NLS Miami Partners is owned by: Ned L. Siegel Fred B. Rothman Bruce S. Grundt Marc Siegel JLA Realco LLC Joel Wolff Howard Schoor 33% Ownership Interest 52.626% 7.336% 7.336% 13.826% 5.05% 6.913% 6.913% 02-1249 M.L. Stoltz Miami Partners 301 Yamato Road Suite 3101 Boca Raton, Florida 33431 M.L. Stoltz Miami Partners is owned by: BFMC Investment, L.L.C. 701 S.E. 6t' Avenue Suite 204 Delray Beach, Florida 33483 BFMC Investment, LLC is owned by: 18.415% Ownership Interest Charles E. Johnson 50% Morris L. Stoltz 50% 14.5.85% Ownership Interest Barry W. Florescue 100% W. i)mitted Into t 'a� public re(,j,,-d in conn',Zpr_..'� n V ith item R 2 � � � on n Priscilla A.. nompson City Clerk 3. Legal description and street address of any real property (a) owned by any party listed in answer to question #2, and (b) located within 500 feet of the subject real property. None MIAMI ONE CENTRE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Florida limited partnership By: Miami One Centre, Inc., a Florida corporation, General Partner Lawrence,J)DeGeorge Chairman nd Chief Execdfive Officer STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2002, by Lawrence J. DeGeorQe, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of personally known t 'me or who has produced 4Avh i not) take an oath. (Stamp) OFRCIAI. NOTAa O�PaY PUe(/ AVRIICPRUSNA * COMMISSION NUMBER .� D0054228 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES `c OF P\-OpSEPT 4.2005 tnershio, a Florida limited partnership. He/She as i i i ion Signat re 02-1249 Submitted Into the public record in, connoctio F°�fh Item pp2 --11 On it t _DY Priscilla A. _I ho ;, -stn EXHMIT "A" City lark Lots 1 though 8, inclusive, Block 2, together with all of Blocks 3 and 4, Du Pont Plaza, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 50, Page 11, public records of Dade County Florida. 02-249 DISCLOSURE OF OWNERSHIP 1. Legal description and street address of subject real property: See attached Exhibit "A". Submitted Into the public m "A itv PZ-tl _Ld ►t 1.� -fir Pns6ia A. Tho City Clerk 2. Contract Purchaser(s)-of subject real property and percentage of ownership. Note: The Code of the City of Miami requires disclosure of all parties having a financial interest, either direct or indirect, in the subject matter of a presentation, request or petition to the City Commission. Accordingly, question #2 requires disclosure of shareholders of corporations, beneficiaries of trusts, and/or any other interested parties, together with their addresses and proportionate interest. '-DI-?.. l Gl-/Lp C 6 LA -S Ll. * i _P Lx- Ltie-yJT-� 5� O CIO -'& r't " �- 33 1 3. Legal description and street address of any real property (a) owned by any party listed in answer to question #2, and (b) located within 500 feet of the subject real property. Ricardo Glas, as Trustee Contract Purchaser Name STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE Contract Purchaser Signature The foregoing i trumen was ac nowledged before me this _ � day of�+�`�� 20 G� by eaecf0 C -/&S who is an individual personally known to me or who has produced as identification and who did (did not) take an oath. ,TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTT� Signature Submitted Into the public reCodrdl, in C nn-Ictaok item 6, Pi isc.iiIa A. nj Fon r .ion EXHIBIT "A" City Clerk Lots 1 though 8, inclusive, Block 2, together with all of Blocks 3 and 4, Du Pont Plaza, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 50, Page 11, public records of Dade County Florida. 02-t240 • �, , e piu b per. Iter rtloli- 1. AFFIDAVIT �riscilla A. City Clerk Before me, the undersigned authority, this day personally appeared Lawrence J. DeGeorge, who being by me first deposes and says: 1. That he is the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Miami One Centre, Inc., a Florida corporation, General Partner of Miami One Centre Limited Partnership, a Florida limited partnership ("Owner"), submitting the accompanying application for a public hearing as required by the Code of the City of Miami, Florida, affecting the real property located in the City of Miami, as described and listed on the foregoing pages of this affidavit and made a part thereof. 2. That all owners which he represents, if any, have given their full and complete permission. for him to act in their behalf for the Major Use Special Permit as set out in the accompanying application, ❑ including responding to day to day staff inquires; J not including responding to day to day staff inquiries in which case he should be contacted at c/o Gilberto Pastoriza, Esq., (305) 854-0800. 3. That the foregoing pages are made a part of this affidavit contain the current names, mailing addresses, telephone numbers -and legal descriptions for the real property owned by Owner. 4. The facts as represented in the application and documents submitted in conjunction with this affidavit are true and correct. Further Affiant sayeth not. Lawrence J. DeGeorge Applicant Name STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF PALM BEACH r—, - -0 C�Aa%dmv Applicant Signa t e - Lawrence J.DeGeorge The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this V day of 2002, by Lawrence J. DeGeorge, as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Miami One Centre, Inc., as m i One Centre Limited Partnership, a Florida limited partnership. He i G eFal-Ra rsonaly known to me o o has produced I ntification and who did (did not) take an oath. V` (Stamp) gn ture O~P RY PUe<i OFFlCIAL NOTARY SEAL AVRII C PRUSNA » COMMISSION NUMBER D0054228 'VAe F�Opo MYCOMMISSIONEXPIRES _ SEPT 4.2005 02-1249 r1ubliC '.•.r' i h iLLOreI �4-1L 0 11 Ig bL Priscilla A. ` s orl MIAMI ONE PROJECT CONTACT DIRECTORY City Clerk CONTRACT PURCHASER RICARDO GLAS, as Trustee 9090 S. Dadeland Boulevard ' Miami, Florida 33156 CONTACT Mr. Ricardo Glas Mr. Tim Welle Mr. Jose Munroz LEGAL TITLE President VP Development Director of Finance Submitted Into the r' 1hlie r� d Citgo ierk PHONE FAX MOBILE EMAIL 305-670-1035 305-670-5083 305-671-5117 305-671-5698 305-796-0954 tim.welleamdmusa.com 305-671-5119 305-670-5731 786-412-3504 jose.munroz(a?mdmusa.com WEISS SEROTA HELFMAN PASTORIZA & GUEDES, P.A. 2665 South Bayshore Drive Suite 420 Miami, Florida 33133 CONTACT TITLE PHONE FAX MOBILE EMAIL Gilberto Pastoriza Partner 305-854-0800 305-854-2323 305-498-1414 epastorizaawsh-flalaw.com ony Recio Associate 305-854-0800 305-854-2323 305-992-6847 trecio0twsh-flalaw.com ARCHITECT NICHOLS BROSCH SANDOVAL & ASSOCIATES 161 Almeria Avenue Coral Gables, Florida 33134 CONTACT TITLE PHONE FAX MOBILE EMAIL Mr. John Nichols President 305-443-5207 305-443-3169 inicholsCc-)nbsarch.com Mr. Bruce Brosch Vice President 305-443-5207 305-446-2872 bbroschanbsarch.com Mr. Greg Sandoval Vice President 305-443-5206 305-446-2872 gsandovalCa?nbsarch.com SURVEYOR FORTIN, LEAVY, SKILES, INC. 180 NW 168 Street North Miami Beach, Florida 33162 CONTACT TITLE PHONE FAX MOBILE EMAIL Mr. Dan Fortin Vice President 305-653-4493 305-652-7152 sls(dslssurvey.com GEO-TECHNICAL LANGAN ENGINEERING & ENVIRONMENAL SERVICES, INC. 7900 Miami Lakes Drive West Suite 102 Miami Lakes, Florida 33016-5897 CONTACT TITLE Ms. Christina Gonzalez Sr. Associate. ARCHAEOLOGIST Subm;I o irate the public iteal, 1'2-1►_F��; _�_i_ 1 q oy {'rise i ...tvi Zion City Clerk PHONE FAX MOBILE 305-362-1166 305-362-5212 ARCHAEOLOGICAL & HISTORICL CONSERVANCY, INC. P.O. Box 450283 Miami, Florida 33145 CONTACT TITLE PHONE FAX MOBILE Mr. Robert Carr Executive Director 954-792-9776 954-792-9954 URBAN PLANNER EDWARD STONE & ASSOCIATES 1512 E. Broward Blvd. Suite 1100 .-'t. Lauderdale, Florida 33301 EMAIL caonzaleza- langan. com EMAIL ahciCa?att. net CONTACT TITLE PHONE FAX MOBILE EMAIL William B. Renner 954-524-3330 .02-i249 eMUMjam d� � �.: f; +4`"':-- foal � ► - CAl1FGE $puARE ' •I• ,I•,, _ I v ,.3 r+,a � SUB. � �'��1 (•ITI r. 3 (5(7. N.E. ST 0 d ,I, V��� .I, I.Ia 1. i, . i.'r 1. ,�. ,�a��I• •la l '. .la i. OS \ NM.2 ST. N.E. 1 2 ST I p 1 �a `� TRACf'B� .I .la el, 1, r.la �. �a',� 1, �. �, 1• I. rla,l• i � V i,� \I\r �Z , u�•° r�a x ��,: +ni.l,a�..�.. �„fs ,alum+. ni.. •+'+ � / 1 N.W 1 ST. N.E. )� .1� Z OOMNTOnYN COUNTY ,la �. ,a •i. I, I• la'r �' Z >�:', 2 •�, .I, 7• - � \ / /. .I a O?tiFA-FlRST ADDfT10NI N9USE 1, fr ,»1,., i. ul„I„1w z i n CD —FL -¢G 9R _ EAST I FLAGLER > > - - .,ST'"”' •S,w 1 ST. S.E. to �ifY � tbds is s- f she Officiat ZmlinS h Y ` M to and ado",d �ldIUaIICe IIlow, Of the City of wantiP. PROPERTY OF , JS + . MIAMI CCNVI;TJTI�JN1 yam.,( .. —.1 SYE.. •I ,I.r �,a u, , : new �T=,Z .� ....I». N .� lu al. ..� p����� "_ra.rd b” AMENDED i BISCAYNE SOULE ARO WAY pbmi le & zo i. E(,EC � ST4TION ; c SS 5 1 TRaC A 8 C FLORIDA Y9MER TH4iCHErt �•/' F \~`.e.,oe I+.r 1 AND LIGHT CO. EV�RERPm5E5-�'^� , OPaRTT 1` _ Gii :i BRA j (� C O 1 9Fi1CKELLKEY ON �� O� ., CLAIJGHTDN 1SLANO SECTION 2 e , �. r ter• % 9 TRACTG 1 4{Q,$S1. -Q j �1 Lzll• I: i ,ia.j sr aF i 3 C TRAC'9' 1 �4R" o_IR 4 L. cQ 2 . }' 1 • al .' I i ( I ! y I ( I � -\\ I I ,� s � � � ...,.<._ ,ca,.,� 1 32 IE 15 JEy v o S D'r' ` SECTION I TRAC• Y SRIGXELL HELL ON LLA4 TOc[ (SilLaVCKC GRAPHI_ 1 acr x :r raJn + /• I Lucrrnn zue oi, j 02-120 T Sub lft-d ., k recd s� i :. ite LAND USE LEGEND Single Family Residential (R-1) . Duplex Residential (R-2) ® Medium Density Multi Family Residential (R-3) - High Density MultiFamily Residential (R-4) - Office (0) - Restricted Commercial (C-1) - General Commercial (C-2) - Central Business District (CBD) ® Major Institutional Public Facilities, Transportation and Utilities (G/1) - Industrial (1) - Recreation (PR) - Conservation (CS) 02-1249 loo • T s !J., vi 'i ►. c 1• n � 61, AI.¢. ST 70 •o T�rA 3 :d i jf Z 10 1 • 1 • [ 4 N 1/ i = A . l } EAST FLA G L E R�"'ST--•--�"� # 2o2' ® dr d r ST. ml 10 /NIX �27�L*�� "OPiN i �.s� --2 ST. �• 0 rub rn kY„5B r c�t .e ... .. r c9 da I.d'e�r�� r: t-d into the CpUbiic item ? Z -11 _cn hV_*-g r Priscilla A. I hor ipson OWNER'S LIST City Clerk Owner's Name Miami One Center Limited Partnership Mailing Address Go Gilberto Pastoriza, 2665 South Bayshore Drive, Suite 420 Miami, Florida Zip Code 33133 Telephone Number (305) 854-0800 Legal Description: See attached Exhibit °A" Owner's Name Mailing Address Telephone Number Legal Description: Owner's Name Mailing Address Telephone Number Legal Description: Zip Code Zip Code Any other real estate property owned individually, jointly, or severally (by corporation, partnership or privately) within 500 feet of the subject site is listed as follows: Street Address Legal Description Street Address Street Address Rev. 06/04/02 Legal Description Legal Description Submitted Into the public record in connedUo vvi€h item _f I -I1 cra �1 L_9 Priscilla A. _i-1.,,:}cry EXHIBIT "A" City Clerk Lots 1 though 8, inclusive, Block 2, together with all of Blocks 3 and 4, Du Pont Plaza, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 50, Page 11, public records of Dade County Florida. 02-1249 Florida Real Estate Decisions, Inc. r ' July 18, 2002 City of Miami Hearing Boards Division Planning, Building and Zoning Division 444 SW 2nd Avenue, 7th Floor Miami, Florida 33130 Re: Property Owners List Within 500 feet of: DUPONT PLAZA PB 50-11 BLKS 2, 3 & 4 200-300 SE 3 ST & 200 SE 2 ST F. Priscilla City Clerk 16375 N.E. 18th Avenue Suite 300 Miami, Fl. 33162 (305)757-6884 3195 N. Powerline Rd. Suite 104 Pompano Beach, Fl. 33069 (954)761-9003 12765 W. Forest Hill Blvd Suite 1314 Wellington, Ft. 33414 (561)798-4423 WWW.FREDIFL.COM This is to certify that the attached ownership list, map and mailing labels are a complete and accurate representation of the real estate property and property owners within 500 feet of the subject property listed above. This reflects the most current records on file in the Miami -Dade County Tax Assessor's office. Sincerely, r< 6WL,� f. Maureen E. Hudson cc: Tony Recio, Esq. WEISS SEROTA HELFMAN, P.A. 2665 South Bayshore Drive, Suite 420 Miami, Florida 33133 *Number of Labels: 50 We 01-0100-000-0022 1181 BISCAYNE BLVD ALL THAT PORTION JF METRO RAIL LYG WITHIN THE BDRY OF THE CITY OF MIAMI 01-0100-000-0520 401 BISCAYNE BLVD MIAMI NORTH PB B-41 TR E OF BLVD BET THE S/L NE 6 ST' PROD ELY & SLY/L SE -2 ST PROD ELY WITH RIP -RTS BAY -FRONT PARK & CITY YACHT BASIN PART 2 OF ASSESSMENT LESS LEASEHOLD TO RESTAURANT ASSOCIATES IND INC & LESS THAT PORT DESIGNATED AS TR B MIA HARBOR BAYFRONT PARK PROJ DEEDED TO USA PER OR 12.590-1427 FOLIO 01-0100-000-0521 & LESS THAT PORT DESIGNATED AS BAYSIDE FOLIO 01-0100-000-0522 & LESS THAT PORT DESIGNATED AS PARKING GARAGE FOR BAYSIDE FOLIO 01-0100-000-0523 01-0112=000-1020 235 SE 1 ST MIAMI NORTH PB B-41 S119.96FT OF E170FT OF W372 BLK 120 LOT SIZE 170.000 X 120 01-0112-000-1040 2 S BISCAYNE BLVD MIAMI NORTH PB B-41 BEG 202FTE OF SE 3RD AVE ON N/L BLK 120 S137FT E10.78FT S93FT E189.80FT NWLY ALG BLVD & W ON FLAGLER ST TO POB LOT SIZE 40236.75 SQ FT 01-0112-000-2010 25 SE 2 AVE MIAMI NORTH PB 25-75 BEG SW COR BLK 120N TH N169.91FT E152FT S97.66F1' W1.75FT S72.25FT W150.25FT TO POB LOT SIZE 169.910FT X 152 DADE COUNTY GSA R/E MGMT - MDTA USER 111 NW 1 ST STE 2460 MIAMI FL 33128-1907 CITY OF MIAMI -DEPT OF P&D ASSET MANAGEMENT DIVISION 444 SW 2 AVE STE #325 MIAMI FL 33130-1910 Submitted Into the public record in tonne kio,,n wi 11 item py-11 0a'l {i iQ oa- PriSOilla A. Thoo,n oil City Clerk SCALLOPS USA INC 245 SE 1 ST MIAMI FL 33131-1908 THE TRUSTESS OF L&B % MARVIN F POER % CO 1591 E ATLANTIC BLVD STE #100 POMPANO BEACH FL 33060 INGRAHAM BUILDING LLC % LEOPOLD KORN & LEOPOLD 20801 BISCAYNE BLVD #501 AVENTURA FL 33180-1400 02-1249 FLORIDA REAL ESTATE DECISIONS, INC. 1 01-0112-000-2011 225 'SE 1 ST MIAMI NORTH PB 25-75 PORT OF BLK 120N BEG 182FT E OF SW COR N72.25FT W31.75FT S72.25FT E31.75FT TO PO LOT SIZE 2294 SQ FT 01-0112-000-2012 226 E FLAGLER ST MIAMI NORTH PB 25-75 PORT OF BLK 120N - BEG 182FTE & 83.78FTN OF SW COR CONT N146.15FT W30FT S91.10FT E3.1FT S55.05FT E26.9FT TO POB LOT SIZE IRREGULAR 01-0112-000-2013 25 SE 2 AVE MIAMI NORTH PB 25-75 PORT OF BLK 120N BEG 182FT E & 72.25FT N OF SW CO W30FT N66.66FT E31FT S55.05FT E26.9FT S11.53FT TO POB LOT SIZE 517 SQ FT 01-0112-000-2020 150 SE 3 AVE MIAMI NORTH E125FT OF THAT PART LYING W OF SE 3 AVE LOT SIZE IRREGULAR PB 25-75 OF BLK 127N 01-0112-000-2030 225 SE 2 ST MIAMI NORTH PB 25-75 THAT PART OF BLK 127 N LYING W SE 3 AVE LESS N102.5FT OF W135 FT & LESS E125FT LOT SIZE IRREGULAR LLOYD AE -REO BOLIVIANO S a 225 SE 1 ST MIAMI FL 33131- uQmitted Into the public record in cannc,7` gin "w th item Pz-u c�T pit qor Prisc:1la A. c,..�:cOn City Clerk 226 EAST FLAGLER CORP 226 E FLAGLER ST MIAMI FL 33131-1389, INGRAHAM BUILDING LLC % LEOPOLD KORN & LEONPOLD 20801 BISCAYNE BLVD #501 AVENTURA FL 33180-1400 SAINT JOSEPH INVESTMENT INC 123 SE 3 AVE STE 121 MIAMI FL 33131-2003 INGR.AHAM PARKING CENTER % NESDC 336 ATLANTIC AVE 3RD FLR OF E ROCKAWAY NY 11518 01-0112-000-2040 200 SE 1 ST MIAMI NORTH PB 25-75 BEG NW COR BLK 127 E135FT S102.5 FT W50FT N40FT W85FT N62.5FT TO POB LOT SIZE IRREGULAR 200 SE FIRST LAND LLC 1111 LINCOLN RD #400 MIAMI BCH FL 33139-2452 92-1.249 FLORIDA REAL ESTATE DECISIONS, INC. 2 01-0112-000-2050 115 SE 2 AVE MIAMI NORTH PB 25-75 S40FT OF N102.5FT OF W85FT BLK 127N LOT SIZE 40.000 X 85 01-0112-000-2060 101 SE 3 AVE MIAMI NORTH PB 25-75 BLK 127N LYG E OF SE 3 AVE LOT SIZE 98273 SQ FT 01-0112-000-3001 1 SE 3 AVE 1.078 AC M/L CHARTER ONE SUBDIVISION TRACT A PB 87-26 LOT SIZE IRREGULAR 01-0112-010-1010 174 E FLAGLER $T MIAMI NORTH PB B-41 LOTS 1 & 2 & S55FT OF 45FT OF LOTS 18-19-20 OF N65FT OF LOT 2 BLK LOT SIZE IRREGULAR LOT 3 & N LESS W 2 IN 121 01-0112-010-1050 139 SE 1 ST MIAMI NORTH PB B-41 W45FT 2.3IN LOT 5 & E20FT LOT 15 & W40FT LOT 16 BLK 121 LOT SIZE IRREGULAR 01-0112-010-1180 151 SE 1 ST MIAMI NORTH PB B-41 E10FT OF LOT 16 & ALL LOT 17 & S75FT OF LOTS 18-19-20 BLK 121 LOT SIZE IRREGULAR 200 SE FIRST LAND LLC 1111 LINCOLN RD #400 MIAMI BCH FL 33139-2452 Submitted mato tb0 ��blic itelT,, 172 -i t 11 City Clerk NORTHWESTERN CAPITAL CORPORATION 100 S BISCAYNE BLVD STE # 1100 MIAMI FL 33131-2029 WALTON STIC INVESTORS II LLC % TERREMARK MANAGEMENT SERVICES 2601 S BAYSHORE DR PH -1 MIAMI FL 33133-5417 CITY OF MIAMI -DEPT OF P&D % CORNERSTONE GROUP 2121 PONCE DE LEON BLVD PH -2 CORAL GABLES FL 33134-5224 GOLDEN REALTY CORP % LERMAN 48 E FLAGLER ST # MIAMI FL 33131-1012 OF MIAMI PH 101 FRAJOCA & JORGAR CORPS & CIPROX USA INC & ELIAS KOBROWSKI 169 E FLAGLER ST #1600 MIAMI FL 33131-1211 02--1240 FLORIDA REAL ESTATE DECISIONS, INC. 3 01-0112-060-1010 MIAMI NORTH PB B-41 N70FT OF LOTS 1 2 & 3 BLK 126 N/A/U 01-4138-39 168.CONDOMINIUM 01-0112-060-1020 120 SE 2 AVE MIAMI NORTH PB B-41 S55FT OF LOTS 1 2 3.& LOTS 18 19 20 BLK 126 LOT SIZE 180.000 X 140 01-0112-060-1030 130 SE 1 ST MIAMI NORTH PB B-41 LOT 4 LESS N12.5FT TO CITY BLK 126 LOT SIZE 50.000 X 113 01-0112-060-1040 130 SE 1 ST MIAMI NORTH PB B-41 LOT 5 LESS N12.5FT TO BLK 126 CITY LOT SIZE 50.000 X 113 01-0112-060-1050 101 SE 1 AVE MIAMI NORTH PB B-41 LOTS 6 THRU 15 LESS N12.5FT OF LOTS 6 & 7 BLK 126 LOT SIZE 59900 SQ FT 01-0112-060-1120 135 SE 2 ST MIAMI NORTH PB B-41 LOT 16 ELK 126 LOT SIZE 50 X 125 REFERENCE ONLY rc, s P2 it__." City Cie k HARTFORD INVESTORS -MIAMI ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 150 SE 2 AVE #1402 MIAMI FL 33131-1582 ALLRIGHT PROP INC %CENTRAL PARKING CORP 2401 21 AVE SOUTH NASHVILLE TN 37212 ALLRIGHT PROP INC %CENTRAL PARKING CORP 2401 21 AVE SOUTH NASHVILLE TN 37212 ULTRAMONT PROPERTIES P 0 BOX 110239 MIAMI FL 33111-0239 ALLRIGHT PROP INC %CENTRAL PARKING CORP 2401 21 AVE SOUTH NASHVILLE TN 37212 01-0112-060-1130 ALLRIGHT PROP INC 153 SE 2 ST %CENTRAL PARKING CORP MIAMI NORTH PB B-41 NASHVILLE TN 37212 LOT 17 BLK 126 LOT SIZE 50 X 125 FLORIDA REAL ESTATE DECISIONS, INC. (USA) INC 0.1-0114-030-1010 300 BISCAYNE BLVD WAY DUPONT PLAZA PB 50-11 TRACTS A -B & C BLK 1 & LESS BEG 24.99FTE OF X OF SE 2 AVE & SE 4 ST TH S23.99FT E6.08FT N40.34FT SWLY SELY A/D 17.81FT TO POB & LESS BEG 114.07FTS & 1.08FTE OF X OF SE 2 AVE & SE 4 ST TH E2.50FT 52.50FT W2.50FT N2.50FT TO POB & LESS BEG 114.07FTS & 9.08FTE OF X OF SE 2 AVE & SE 4 ST TH E2.50FT 52.50FT W2.50FT N2.50FT TO POB LOT SIZE 132632 SQ FT 01-0114-030-1040 201 S BISCAYNE BLVD DUPONT PLAZA PB 50-11 PORT OF TR D BLK 1 DESC BEG NE COR OF TR D TH W645.94FT SWLY ALG A/D 26.81FT SLY149.57FT 5293.50FT E179.41FT N15OFT E525.36FT N30OFT TO POB NAW 01-3136-079-0010-0020 01-0114-030-1350 200 S BISCAYNE BLVD DUPONT PLAZA PB 50-11 ALL OF BLK 5 LOT SIZE 107158 SQ FT D P PROPERTY HOLDING LLC 2901 COLLINS AVE MIAMI BEACH FL 33140 Submitted Into t q . Gapublice piF+iraC� Ciiy Clerk REFERENCE ONLY SRI MIAMI VENTURE LP 310 W MCINTYRE ST KEY BISCAYNE FL 33149 FLORIDA REAL ESTATE DECISIONS, INC. `'+� 01-0210-000-1050 401 BRICKELL AVE BRICKELL PT PB 8-93 2.188 ACM/L THAT PT LOT 1 DESC COMM X ELY R/W/L BRICKELL AVE & NLY LINE SE 5 ST NLY ALG ELY R/W/L BRICKELL AVE AS REC PB 8-34 A/D 141.48FT M/L NLY 112.78FT TO POB CONT NLY 186.52FT M/L TO PT ON BLKHD/L OF SO BANK MIAMI RIVER ELY ALG SAID BLKHD/L 282.37FT M/L CONT ALG BLKHD/L N 72 DEG E 131.07FT M/L TO P/C TH ELY &-SLY A/D 97.74FT M/L S 51 DEG E 64.54FT M/L S 38 DEG W 221FT S 88 DEG W 407.5FT M/L TO POB LESS W10FT FOR ST & LESS E17.16FT OF W27.16FT OF THAT PT LOT 1 AS DESC ABOVE FOR BRICKELL AVE BRIDGE AS REC OR 10973-341 & SUBJ TO UND % IN PVT ROADWAY AS DESC/CHANCERY CASE # 54811-A DADE CO CIR CT & SUBJ TO PERMANENT EASEMENT TO FDOT AS REC OR 15569-1231& INT IN PERMANENT EASEMENT (AKA PARCEL 810) AS REC IN OR 16791-2583 LOT SIZE 95306 SQ FT 01-0210-000-1060 444 BRICKELL AVE 1 54 41 1.782 AC BRICKELL POINT PB 8-93 PORT LOT 1 BLK 103 DESC COMM NW COR LOT 1 TH N 80 DEG E124.22FT S 74 DEG E415.79FT FOR POB TH S 13 DEG W 419.38FT S 76 DEG E 125FT TH BY CURVE TO LEFT NLY AD 39.27FT N78FT NLY AD 152.3FT N169.7FT WLY7.97FT N 74 DEG W 140.55FT TO POB LESS PORT LYG IN R/W LOT SIZE 77662 SQ FT 01-3137-022-0010 298 SE 2 AVE MIAMI -CONVENTION CENTER AMEND PB 119-36 TR B LOT SIZE .143 AC M/L MIAMI DADE COUNTY GSA/MIAMI CIRCLE 111 NW 1 ST STE 2460 MIAMI FL 33128-1907 Submitted Into the pubes re City Clerk RIVERGATE INVESTORS LLC 701 BRICKELL AVE #3000 MIAMI FL 33131-5340 CITY OF MIAMI -DEPT OF P&D ASSET MANAGEMENT DIVISION 444 SW 2 AVE STE #325 MIAMI FL 33130-1910 FLORIDA REAL ESTATE DECISIONS, INC. .:., 01-3137-022-0020 400 SE 2 AVE MIAMI CONVENTION CENTER AMEND PB 119-36 TR C LESS BEG SE COR OF TR C TH W4.57FT N 2 DEG W 189.77FT N90.11FT S 2 DEG E 280.56FT TO POB FOR R/W LOT SIZE 4.140 AC M/L 01-3137-022-0030 300 SE 2 AVE MIAMI CONVENTION CENTER AMEND PB 119-36 TRACT C TENANT OWNED IMPROVEMENTS LOCATED IN AIR & SPACE RIGHTS DESCRIBED IN LEASE BETWEEN THE CITY OF MIAMI & MIAMI CENTER ASSOC LTD 01-3137-022-0031 MIAMI CONVENTION CENTER AMD PB 119-36 TR C LEASED AIR & SPACE RIGHTS PER LEASE BETWEEN THE CITY OF MIAMI & MIAMI CENTER ASSOC LTD 01-4137-020-0010 200 SE 2 AVE HALL-BELCHER TRACT PB 102-30 TR -A LESS BEG SW COR TR -A TM E32.49FT NELY88.78FT N 8 DEG E4.67FT NWLY6.50FT SWLY4.82FT NWLY21.81FT S5.19FT W34.50FT N10.61FT NWLY10.58FT W18.96FT N4 FT W26.91FT 536.61FT TO POB LOT SIZE 51412 SQ FT CITY OF MIAMI -DEPT OF P & D ASSET MANAGEMENT DIVISION 444 SW 2 AVE #325 MIAMI FL 33130-1910 Submitted Into the public record i item P? -! I _ .cr City Clerk HYATT EQUITIES LLC 200 W MADISON CHICAGO IL 60606 CITY OF MIAMI % OFFICE OF ASSET MGMT 444 SW 2 AVE STE 325 MIAMI FL 33130-1910 MIAMI CONVENTION HOTEL CORP % AVR REALTY COMPANY 1 EXECUTIVE BLVD YONKERS NY 10701 01-4137-022-0010 CITY OF MIAMI -DEPT OF P&D 100 SE 2 ST ASSET MANAGEMENT DIVISION WORLD TRADE CENTER 444 SW 2 AVE STE ##325 PB 115-41 MIAMI FL 33130-1910 TRACT A LOT SIZE 62291 SQ FT FLORIDA REAL ESTATE DECISIONS, INC. 02 -.� 1249 01-4137-022-0020 100'SE 2 ST WORLD TRADE CENTER PB 115-41 TR A TENANT OWNED IMPROVEMENT LOCATED IN AIR RIGHTS DESCRIBED IN RIDER TO LEASE BETWEEN TH CITY OF MIAMI & DARE SAVINGS & LOAN ASSOC 01-4137-022-0021 100 SE 2 ST WORLD TRADE CENTER PB 115-41 TR A LEASED AIR RIGHTS PER RIDER TO LEASE BETWEEN THE CITY OF MIAMI & DADE SAVINGS & LOAN ASSOC 01-4206-060-0010 .848 BRICKELL KEY DR 2601 ONE MIAMI PARCEL A PB 155-80 T-20401 TR A LOT SIZE 132319 SQ FT NOP 100 SE 2ND ST TOWER LLC HINES NATL OFFICE PTNRS LTD 101 CALIFORNIA ST #1000 SAN FRANCISCO CA 94111 Submitted Into the public record i,j c0rjr,,,,-,ry n ,� it pCise iiia A. City Clerk CITY OF MIAMI -% OFFICE OF ASSET MGMT 444 SW 2 AVE STE 325 MIAMI FL 33130-1910 MIAMI ONE CENTRE LTD PARTNERSHIP 301 YAMATO RD BOCA RATON FL 33431 02.120 FLORIDA REAL ESTATE DECISIONS, INC. 8 GC', .t. stern Priscilla A. Thompson City Clerk a2-1249 : 01-3136-079-0001 260 BISCAYNE BLVD WAY MIAMI CENTER CONDO DESC DUPONT PLAZA PB 50-11 PORT OF TR D BLK 1 DESC BEG NE COR OF TR D TH W645.94FT SWLY ALG AD 26.81FT SLY149.57FT 5293.50FT E179.41FT N150FT E525.36FT N300FT TO POB LESS LIFT STATION 01-3136-079-0010 100 CHOPIN PLAZ MIAMI CENTER CONDOMINIUM UNIT HOTEL UNDIV .50% INT IN COMMON ELEMENTS OFF REC 14008-1398 0289 5 01-3136-079-0011 DUPONT PLAZA PB 50-11 PORT OF TR D BLK 1 DESC COMM AT MOST NWLY COR OF TR D LYG S OF BISCAYNE BLVD WAY TH NWLY FOR AD 176.71FT TH N 02 .DEG E 377FT TH N 26 DEG E 127FT FOR POB TH S 87 DEG E 35.77FT N 02 DEG E 25.85FT N 30 DEG W 7.15FT N 87 DEG W 31.92FT.S 02 DEG W 31.55FT TO POB LOT SIZE 1123 SQ FT 01-313.6-079-0020 201 S BISCAYNE BLVD MIAMI CENTER CONDOMINIUM UNIT OFFICE BUILDING UNDIV .50% INT IN COMMON ELEMENTS OFF REC 14008-1398 0289 5 MIAMI CENTER OWNERS' ASSOCIATION CT CORPORATION SYSTEM 1200 S PINE ISLAND ROAD PLANTATION FL 33324 Ct4 l Oi � 1 Ito Priscilla A. Thc,mpsOn City Clerk 4.._ INTER -CONTINENTAL FLA LTD THIRD FLOOR ACCOUNTING DEPT 100 CHOPIN PLAZA MIAMI FL 33131-4342 DADE COUNTY. WASD-LIFT STATION USER PO BOX 330316 MIAMI FL 33233 CRESCENT MIAMI CENTER LLC ATTN VICTOR GRANT 66 W FLAGLER STSTE 600 MIAMI FL 33130 'o2 ` 11.419 FLORIDA REAL ESTATE DECISIONS, INC. 1 01-4138-039-0001 168. CONDOMINIUyI DESC MIAMI NORTH PB B-41 N70FT OF LOTS 1 2 & 3 BLK 126 01-4138-039-0010 168 SE 1 ST 1 168 CONDOMINIUM UNIT 1 UNDIV 1/13 INT IN COMMON ELEMENTS OFF REC 11661-415 01-4138-039-0020 168 SE 1 ST 2 168 CONDOMINIUM UNIT 2 UNDIV 1/13 INT IN COMMON ELEMENTS OFF REC 11661-415 01-4138-039-0030 168 SE 1 ST 3 168 CONDOMINIUM UNIT 3 UNDIV 1/13 INT IN COMMON ELEMENTS OFF REC 11661-415 01-4138-039-0040 168 SE 1 ST 4 168 CONDOMINIUM UNIT 400 UNDIV .0376 INT IN COMMON ELEMENTS OFF REC 11661-415 168 CONDO SSOC INC BRUCE HOIci,STEIN, REG AGENT 317 - 71S.T STREET, SUITE 500 MIAMI BEACH FL 33141 168 CONDO ASSOC INC JACOB PFEFFER, DVP 168 SE 1 ST 12TH FLOOR MIAMI FL 33131 NORTH AMERICAN ASSOCIATES 1 NE 1 ST STE 700 MIAMI FL 33132-2483 NORTH AMERICAN ASSOCIATES 1 NE 1 ST #700 MIAMI FL 33132-2483 SL3bt'B'litteo ;nto the, pvblic record in OOni16?C$P n `. item 2 -u on i► oa- Priscilla A. Thompson w City Clerk JORDI F VERITE &W MARIA L 168 SE 1 ST UNIT 3 MIAMI FL 33131 NESTOR & ADRIANA CULOTTA 168 SE 1 ST UNIT 400 MIAMI FL 33131-1446 FLORIDA REAL ESTATE DECISIONS, INC. l 02-1249 01-4138-039-0041 168 SE 1 ST 401 168 CONDOMINIUM UNIT 401 UNDIV .039223% INT IN COMLJN ELEMENTS OFF REC 11661-415 & 17945-2906 01-4138-039-0050 168 SE 1 ST 500, 168 CONDOMINIUM UNIT 500 UNDIV .045585% INT IN COMMON ELEMENTS OFF.REC 11661-415 01-4138-039-0051 168 SE 1 ST 501 168 CONDOMINIUM UNIT 501 UNDIV .031338% INT IN COMMON ELEMENTS OFF REC 11661-415 01-4138-039-0060 168 SE 1 ST 6 168 CONDOMINIUM UNIT 6 UNDIV 1/13 INT IN COMMON ELEMENTS OFF REC 11661-415 01-4138-039-0070 168 SE 1 ST 7 168 CONDOMINIUM UNIT 7 UNDIV 1/13 INT IN COMMON ELEMENTS OFF REC 11661-415 01-4138-039-0080 168 SE 1 ST 168 CONDOMINIUM UNIT 801 UNDIV .049348 INT IN COMMON ELEMENTS 15041-2007 NESTOR C'L TTA &W ADRIPINA 19221 E O.-uKNIONT DR MIAIMI LAKES FL 33015-2003 JORDI F VERITE 168 SE 1 ST 300 MIAMI FL 33131 Submitted Ir tc) the public record in �.� t���':'- � °pith item z-11 on u Priscilla A. Ti Ern son City Clerk YELLOW STAR WHOLESALER TOUR USA 3440 HOLLYWOOD BLVD-STE 360 HOLLYWOOD FL 33021 168 BUILDING COM INC 168 SE 1 ST #6 MIAMI FL 33131-1403 SUPPORT BTI CORP 117 GAVILAN AVE CORAL GABLES FL 33143-6557 168 FRESH LOOK INC PO BOX 110223 MIAMI FL 33111 FLORIDA REAL ESTATE DECISIONS, INC. 12 02 -v -i249 01-4138-039-0081 168 SE 1 ST 168 -CONDO UNIT 802 UNDIV .049348% INT IN COMMON ELEMENTS OFF REC 11661-415 01-4138-039-0082 168 SE 1 ST 168 CONDO UNIT 803 UNDIV .025436 INT IN COMMON ELEMENTS OFF REC 11661-415 01-4138-039-0090 168 SE 1 ST 9 168 CONDOMINIUM UNIT 9 UNDIV 1/13 INT IN COMMON ELEMENTS OFF REC 11661-415 01-4138-039-0100 168 SE 1 ST 10 168 CONDOMINIUM UNIT 10 UNDIV 1/13 INT IN COMMON ELEMENTS OFF REC 11661-415 01-4138-039-0110 168 SE 1 ST 11 168 CONDOMINIUM UNIT 11 UNDIV 1/13 INT IN COMMON ELEMENTS OFF REC 11661-415 01-4138-039-0120 168 SE 1 ST 12 168 CONDOMINIUM UNIT 12 UNDIV 1/13 INT IN COMMON ELEMENTS OFF REC 11661-415 JOSE R AI REZ & MARY E KRAMER 168 SE 1 SI' #802 MIAMI FL 33131-1406 168 FRESH LOOK PO BOX 110223 MIAMI FL 3.3111 SLibmitted Into the, public record, in item 11 Priscilla A..i City Clerk INC AMERICAN INV LLC 168 SE 1 ST 900 - MIAMI FL 33131-1415 INTERNATIONAL OFFICE INC 1541 BRICKELL AVE #2905 MIAMI FL 33129-1226 CECILIA ZURITA 168 SE 1 ST 11 MIAMI FL 33131 JACKE CORP 168 SE 1 ST MIAMI FL 33131 FLORIDA REAL ESTATE DECISIONS, INC. 13 02.1249 01-4138-039-0130 168 SE 1 ST 13PH 168 CONDOMINIUM UNIT PH UNDIV 1/13 INT IN COMMON ELEMENTS OFF REC 11661-415 ARNOLD FC 'j -NY &W EMELY 168 SE 1 ST UNIT PH MIAMI FL . 33131-1408 Submifted Into tNo public `- items C,i, i� 1q�4.X- P City CIerk FLORIDA REAL ESTATE DECISIONS, INC. 14 02-1249 r% ONE MIAMI .►.t.- FrisciiSa A.',':� tor, �':'.-son ZONING ANALYSIS,.. City Clerk . August 22, 2002 ZONING DISTRICT CBD LOT AREA GROSS SF ACRES NET SF Tract B 163,785 3.78 107,343 Tract C 119,790 2.75 75,780 Tract D 121,532 2.79 75,777 FLOOR AREA Maximum Allowed: Unlimited Floor Area Ratio Actual: SF GROSS LOT AREA FAR Tract B 717,745 + 163,785 = 4.38 Tract C 605,425 + 119,790 = 5.05 Tract D 830,750 + 121,532. = 6.84 LOT COVERAGE Required: Not Applicable Actual: BLDG COVERAGE GROSS AREA PERCENT COVERAG Tract B 72,425 + 163,785 = 44% Tract C 61,425 + 119,790 = 51% Tract D 67,375 + 121,532 = 55% OPEN SPACE Required: One SF of open space per 50 SF of floor area over 50,000 SF Actual: SF REQ'D SF PROWD Tract B 717,745 - 50,000 = 667,745 - 50 = 13,355 39,164 Tract C 605,425 - 50,000 = 555,425 + 50 = 11,109 48,461 Tract D 830,750 - 50,000 = 780,750 + 50 = 15,615 47,430 Project 2271 File: ZoningAnalysis_082202- Tab: ZoneAnalysis Page I of 3 02-1249 Submitted Into the public record in connectio�nvvith item ._'2-j on !` LI16 Priscilla A. ret,,,°;-�x ;en ONE MIAMI City Clerk ZONING ANALYSIS HEIGHT Allowable: Unlimited Actual: Tract B 400'-0" (top of roof) Tract C 400'-0" (top of roof) Tract D 750'-0" (top of roof) SETBACKS Required: 5'-0" from all streets 1,000 units per acre Provided: Provided: USE SF Tract B Retail NORTH SOUTH EAST 'WEST Tract B 15'-0" 8'-0" 5'-0" 10'-0" Tract C 15'-0" 8'-0" 5'-0" 30'-0" Tract D 5'-0" 5'-0" 5'-0" 15'-0" DENSITY Health Club 17,500 Residential Allowable: 1,000 units per acre Provided: USE SF Tract B Retail 81,275 Theaters 61,300 Residential 602,245 Tract C Retail 32,850 Office 9,000 Residential 633,785 Tract D Retail 25,700 Health Club 17,500 Residential 799,755 Project 2271 File: ZoningAnalysis_082202- Tab: ZoneAnalysis UNITS UNITS / ACRE 400 400 + 3.78 = 106 450 450 + 2.75 = 164 650 650 + 2.79 = 233 0 2 J29 "I �X)MiFtry a AIA 3'k ONE MIAMI ZONING ANALYSIS PARKING Required: No minimum parking requirements Maximum: Office 1 space per 1,000 SF over 10,000 SF Residential 1 spaces per unit Retail 1 space per 1,000 SF Restaurant 1 space per 100 SF USE SF or UNITS Tract B SPACES REQUIRED Project 2271 File: ZoningAnalysis-082202- Tab: ZoneAnalysis Page 3 of 3 02-1249 Retail + Cinema 142,575 + 1,000 = 143 Residential 400 x 1 = 400 Total Spaces Required Tract B = 543 Tract C Retail 32,850 + 1,00 - 0 = 33 Office 9,000 -+ 0 = 0 Residential 450 x 1 = 450 Total Spaces Required Tract C = 43 Tract D Retail 25,700 + 1,000 = 26 Health Club 17,500 + 1,000 = 18 Residential 650 x 1 = 650 Total Spaces Required Tract D = 693 Total Spaces Required = 1,719 Provided: See chart already done PROVIDED SPACES Tract B 926 Tract C 922 Tract D East 1,467 West 969 Total Parking Provided = 4,284 Project 2271 File: ZoningAnalysis-082202- Tab: ZoneAnalysis Page 3 of 3 02-1249 Submt+ed Into the public reps �v z C�.) ~dry `th ONE MIAMI itero. P z i C CBD/CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICTb�i`-� €. ! Clerk Per CITY CODE, Chapter 36, Construction Equipment Request for waiver of noise ordinance while under construction for continuous pours. Per CITY CODE, Section 55-14 to have City Commission approve the pedestrian bridges across SE 3`d Avenue. Per CITY CODE, Chapter 4, designation of the entertainment retail center located at the NE corner of SE 3`d Avenue and SE 4d' Street as retail specialty center as that term is defined in Section 4-2. Per CITY CODE, Chapter 23-5(a), Request for a Certificate of Appropriateness for ground disturbing activity in an Archaelogical Conservation Area. SUBSTANTIAL MODIFICATION TO A MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT, per Article 17, Section 1701, and Article 22 of City of Miami Zoning Ordinance 11000, as amended, to allow a change in the original application (substantial modification for previously approved resolution # C C 98-1151) from 383,000 square feet (as modified by resolution # C C 02-858) of nonresidential floor area to approximately 240,000 square feet; SUBSTANTIAL MODIFICATION TO A MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT, per Article 17, Section 1701, and Article 22 of City of Miami Zoning Ordinance 11000, as amended, to allow a change in the original application (substantial modification for previously approved resolution # C C 98-1151) from parking structures consisting of 5815 spaces (as modified by resolution # C C 02-858) to approximately 4,284 spaces; SUBSTANTIAL MODIFICATION TO A MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT, per Article 17, Section 1701, and Article 22 of City of Miami Zoning Ordinance 11000, as amended, to allow a change in the original application (substantial modification for previously approved resolution # C C 98-1151) to convert 250,000 square feet of office use to residential use using the same coefficient as those in Increment I of the Downtown Miami Development of Regional Impact. (250,000) x (.0044) = 1,100 units Prior to above conversion, 1,172,000 square feet (resolution # C C 98-1151 as modified by resolution # C C 02-858) of office was available. After the conversion 1,022,000 square feet is still available. Prior to above conversion, 600 residential units (resolution # C C 98-1151 as modified by resolution # C C 02-858) were available. After above conversion, 1,700 units are now available. The Major Use encompasses the following special permits: a2-12#9 CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT, as per Article 4, Section 401, fence and covered walkway within the Central Business District. 01- ion for a temporary construction CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 4, Section 401, for development of new construction within the Central Business District. CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 908.2 for access from a public street roadway width greater than 25 feet. CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 4, Section 401 to approve open space and/or residential recreation space as shown on the plans. CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 4, Section 401 to allow for wholesale activities at the ground floor level along designated primary pedestrian pathways so long as ground floor frontage consists of a retail or open to the public component. CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 4, Section 401 to allow for parking garages. CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 4, Section 401 to allow for outdoor eating areas, outdoor cafes, outdoor display and sale of food or live flowers and plants. CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 922.8 to allow for combined off-street loading facilities. CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 903.1 to allow development of a project divided by a street. CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Section 915.2 for FAA clearance letter. CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 925.3.8, to allow development/construction/rental signage CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 918.2 for parking and staging of construction during construction. CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 920. 1, to allow a trailer and watchman's quarters for construction and other temporary office uses such as leasing and sales. CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 922.4(c) to allow maneuvering of trucks on public rights of way. CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 906.6, for pool/outdoor recreation area. 2 CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 917.1.2 to allow valet parking for residential and other uses. CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 906.9 to allow for a special event namely a ground breaking ceremony. CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 4, Section 401 to allow for bars, saloons, taverns and/or supper clubs. CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 4, Section 401 to allow for child day care facilities CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 917. 1.1 to allow backing into a street. Designation as a phased project, pursuant to Section 2502 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, as amended (approved by Reso. No. 98-1151) from parcel a, b, c, d to east half of d first, then b and c, then west half of d. REQUEST that the following MUSP conditions be required at the time of Temporary Certificate of Occupancy or Final Certificate of Occupancy instead of at issuance of foundation permit: b. the requirement to record in the Public Records a Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions providing that the ownership, operation and maintenance of all common areas and facilities will be by the property owner or a mandatory property owner association; and C. the requirement to record in the Public Records a unity of title or covenant in lieu of unity of title. 3 itern PrisGiib A. City Clerk X02-1249 ONE MIAMI MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT Submitted Into the public record in connection With item PZ-Vk on it1R o Priscilla A. Thompson City clerk 1. Section 1304.1.1 Application Forms; Supplementary Materials. a. Statements of ownership and control of the proposed development. The Disclosure of Ownership and Ownership affidavit are provided in Article I. b. Statement describing in detail the character and intended use of the development. One Miami (the "Project") is -intended to be a mixed-use residential, commercial, and office development in downtown Miami, just north of the Miami River within Miami's Central Business District (CBD}). As the fust development to offer substantial residential housing in that area of downtown, the intent is to create a new pedestrian -friendly downtown neighborhood providing residential, retail, entertainment, and fitness and recreation amenities not only for the residents of the Project, but also for workers in downtown, tourists and business travelers occupying the closely situated hotels, and residents of the nearby Brickell area. The Project includes three residential towers that will provide 1,500 much needed housing units to the downtown area and 9,000 square feet of office space, as well as over 218,500 square feet in ground and second floor retail. Integrated into the center of the development via well-designed pedestrian passages will be a four-story retail/entertainment complex with 106,150 square feet of retail including 16 movie screens. Further emphasizing the pedestrian nature of the Project, the development includes urban design -style wide sidewalks, pedestrian encouraging plazas, and lush landscaping along all corridors. Lastly, the entire Project has been designed to accommodate the views and property values of the surrounding buildings and uses. The property is comprised of three parcels, described as "Parcel B", "Parcel C", and "Parcel D", respectively. Parcel B is surrounded by Southeast 3rd Street on the north, Biscayne Boulevard Way/Southeast 4d' Street on the south, Biscayne Boulevard on the east, and Southeast 3rd Avenue on the west. It has a net lot area of 2.46 acres (107,343 square feet) and a gross lot area of 3.76 acres (163,785 square feet). The eastern portion of Parcel B will be developed as a 39 story, 400 -unit condominium with 36,425 square feet of ground and second -floor retail, which will include 926 parking spaces. The western portion will contain the 4 -story retail/entertainment complex which will provide 106,150 square feet of retail including 16 movie screens. 1 027124-9 Submitted Into the public 3cord in co stem PZ-1% en 0 11 o�- Priscille A. I hornp on Parcel C is surrounded by Southeast 3' Street on the north, 945W& rk Boulevard/Southeast 4' Street on the south, Southeast 3`d Avenue on the east, and Southeast 2"d Avenue on the west. It has a net lot area of 1.74 acres (75,780 square feet) and a gross lot area of 2.75 acres (119,790 square feet). Parcel C will be developed as a 450-unit, 42-floor apartment building with 9,000 square feet of office space and 32,850 square feet of ground and second floor retail. The apartment building will include 922 parking spaces as well as loading facilities to accommodate both itself and .the re_ tail/entertainment complex to the east. Parcel D is surrounded by Southeast 2' Street on the north, Southeast 3' Street on the south, Southeast Yd Avenue on the east, and Southeast 2' Avenue on the west. It has a net lot area of 1.74 acres (75,777 square feet) and a gross lot area of 2.79 acres (121,532 square feet). The eastern portion of Parcel D will be developed as a mixed-use retail, recreation, and parking structure that will provide 1,467 spaces to replace the existing number of surface parking spaces, accommodate the additional parking needs of the retail/entertainment complex, and provide Project's parking needs during the phases of construction. The parking structure will also house 33,200 square feet of retail. The western portion of Parcel D will be developed as a 650 -unit, 72 -floor apartment building which will include 10,000 square feet of ground and second floor retail and 969 parking spaces. The first phase of development for the entire project calls for construction of the Parcel D parking structure that will accommodate the current users of the surface lot and construction workers working on the Project. Drawings showing the location of the intended uses are included under Tab 7 of Article III. c. General location map, showing relation of the site for which special permit is sought to major street, schools, existing utilities, shopping areas, important physical features in and adjoining the project and the like. Location maps and aerial maps indicating the surrounding streets and properties are included in Article I. d. A site plan containing the title pf the project and the names of the project planner and developer, date, and north arrow based on an exact survey of the property drawn of sufficient size to show: The Site Plan is located under Tab 2, Article III. 2 02-1249 record I e c\i3d En ._-f� item t —1 k Cn / 1_'i oY Prigcilia A. Thdripscn-- accommodate the surface parking currently located on all three parcclTs!ty Clerk Loading and delivery areas are provided as shown in the plans, interior to each residential building. Loading and delivery for the retail/entertainment complex will take place in the loading bays provided in Parcel C. From there, merchandise and supplies will be transported to the retail/entertainment complex via underground tunnel. The intent of the interior loading bays and tunnel is to screen the surrounding areas form unsightly trucks and eliminate delivery -related traffic disruptions. v. Recreation facilities locations. = All three residential towers will provide meeting and social rooms for the use of their residents. In addition, the three residential towers will contain rooftop recreation decks at their respective podium levels which will include state-of-the-art infinity edge pools and lavish landscaping. Parcel D's parking garage building will provide a 12,600 square foot fitness club as well as a rooftop lap pool and jogging track for the use of well fitness club members. The retail/entertainment center is also designed to provide recreational amenities (movie theater) to the entire Property. A. All screens and buffers. Rooftop mechanical equipment on the three residential towers will be buffered from view by distinctive architectural elements which will serve to identify the project as a unified neighborhood and further serve to emphasize the landmark nature of the entire One Miami project. All other mechanical equipment will be located within the internal spaces of the buildings. The extensive landscaping is illustrated in pages SP 2 and SP 3, located under Tab 7, Article III. vii. Refuse collection areas. Waste collection will be provided by the City of Miami or by a private company and will be internal to each building. There will be no curbside refuse collection. viii. Access to utilities and points of utilities hookups. All utilities shall be underground. Access and connections to site utilities are discussed in the Site Utility Study located under Tab 4, Article III. 4 02-12A9 Submitted Into the public record inonnecti n w'th item PZ_ �I on y q Priscilla A rh mp on Cit Clerk e. Tabulations of total gross acreage in the project and the percentages thereof proposed to be devoted to: i. The various permitted uses. Parcel B: Gross acreage: 3.76 acres Total developable area (TDA): 1,133,000 square feet (26.0 acres) - Residential: 593,645 square feet (52.4 % of TDA} Retail (includes cinema): 142,575 square feet (12.6% of TDA) Parcel C: Gross acreage: 2.75 acres Total developable area (TDA): 1,130,845 square feet (26.0 acres) Residential: 624,335 square feet (55.2% of TDA) Retail: 32,850 square feet (2.9% of TDA) Office: 9,000 square feet (0.8 % of TDA) Parcel D: Gross acreage: 2.79 acres Total developable area (TDA) : 1,836,800 square feet (42.2 acres) Residential: 732,500 square feet (39.9% of TDA) Retail: 43,200 square feet (2.4% of TDA) TOTAL: Gross acreage: 9.3 acres Total developable area (TDA): 4,100,645 square feet (94.2 acres) Residential: 1,950,480 square feet (47.6% of TDA) Retail (including cinema): 218,625 square feet (5.3 % of TDA) Office: 9,000 square feet (0.2% of TDA) ii. Ground coverage by structures. Ground coverage for Parcel B is 44% of the gross lot area. Ground coverage for Parcel C is 51 % of the gross lot area. Ground coverage for Parcel D is 55 % of the gross lot area. 5 f. Tabulation showing: Yor>FJ`lo 7 the public i�.�1,.1� iteni Pa -I1 Vri5�ii A. Thompson City Clerk i. The derivation of numbers of offstreet parking and offstreet loading spaces shown in (d) above. The minimum total number of spaces required is 1,728. The total number of spaces provided is 4,284 which includes parking for new development as well as replacement parking for the spaces on the currently vacant parcels. The derivation of the number of offstreet parking spaces is included within the Project Data Summary in Article I. ii. Total project density in dwelling units per acre. The Project calls for 161 units per gross acre, well under the 1,000 units per acre permitted in the Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan and the Zoning Ordinance. In fact, even when analyzed individually, each parcel will be developed at far less than the permitted density. The approximate density of the Parcel B condominium tower is 106 units per gross acre. Parcel C has an approximate density of 164 units per gross acre. Parcel D's apartment building provides for an approximate density of 233 units per gross acre. g. Statements as to how common facilities are to be provided and permanently maintained. All common facilities will be maintained initially by the Owner. Common facilities of the Tract B Condominium tower will be maintained by the condominium association. h. Storm drainage and sanitary sewerage plans. Storm drainage, water distribution, waste water and solid waste generation provisions are discussed in the Site Utility study under Tab 4, Article III. i. Architectural definitions for buildings in the development; exact number of dwelling units, sizes, and types, together with typical floor plans of each type. Parcel B contains 400 condominium units. Parcel C contains 450 apartment units. Parcel D contains 650 apartment units. Detailed information and breakdown of square footage of all uses are found in the Project Date Summary located in Article I. ral 02--1249 'ta'arn.":ec "nto t yea public E )'Go ld� m cani4eut,G i ` m PZ -1 I cin t t I JA>' - 'a A. Thompson - Typical floor plans for the three residential towers are included in under Tab g,ity Clerk Article III. j. Signage plans. Signage for each building within the project will be done separately, as the need arises. k. Landscaping plan, including types, sizes and locations of vegetation and decorative shrubbery, and showing provisions for irrigation and future maintenance. The streetscapes will be consistent throughout and will include lavish landscaping, extra -wide sidewalks with decorative pavers, plazas, and covered loggias. A description of the proposed landscaping is included in the landscaping plans provided in Sheets SP 2 through SP 3, located under Tab 7, Article III. 1. Plans for recreation facilities, including location and general description of buildings for such use. All three residential towers will provide meeting and social rooms for the use of their residents. In addition, the three residential towers will provide rooftop recreation decks at their respective podium levels which will include state-of- the-art infinity edge pools and lavish landscaping. Parcel D's parking garage building will provide a 12,600 square foot fitness club as well as a rooftop lap pool and jogging track for the use of the residents living in the Parcel D residential tower as well fitness club members. The retail/entertainment center is also designed to provide recreational amenities (movie theater) to residents and visitors to the Project. in. Such additional data, maps, plans, or statements as may be required for the particular use or activity involved. The drawings submitted with this Application are located under Tab 7, Article III. n. Such additional data as the applicant may believe is pertinent to the proper review for compliance and consideration of the site and development plan. Elevations and sections depicting the architectural and aesthetic character of the project are included in Sheets A6.1 through A6.8 and 7.1 through 7.2, located under Tab 7, Article III. 7 02,-1249 Submitte,d Into the public record. in tccnnc,�,on A`ith item P7_11 011 Pt isdlia A. " p .. Cin 2. Section 1702.2.1 General Report pity Clerk a. Property ownership and beneficial interest within the boundaries of the area proposed for Major Use Special Permit. Statement of Ownership and beneficial interest within the boundaries of the area proposed for the Major Use Special Permit are provided in Article I. b. The nature of the unified interest or control. The nature of unified interest or control is indicated in Article I. c. Survey of the proposed area showing property lines and ownership; existing features, including streets, alleys, easements, utilities lines, existing land use, general topography, and other physical features. A copy of the Survey is included under Tab 1, Article IIl. d. Materials to demonstrate the relationship of the elements listed in (3) preceding to surrounding area characteristics. The drawings submitted with this Application are located under Tab 7, Article III. e. Existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan designations for the area on and around the lands proposed for Major Use Special Permit. The existing zoning designation for the property pursuant to the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, is CBD, Central Business District. Page 36 of the Official Zoning Atlas Map is located in Article I, and indicates the existing and surrounding zoning. The Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan future land use designation for the property is Central Business District and is shown on the land use map located in Article I. Additionally, the Project is located within the Downtown Miami Development of Regional Impact (the "DRI"). The proposed uses for the Project are permitted in the DRI and are consistent with both the properties' zoning district and future land use designation. The Project was also the subject of Resolution No. 98-1151 which approved a Major Use Special Permit (the "Original MUSP") on the Property. The proposed intensity of development will have a far lesser impact than the development contemplated by the Original MUSP. 8 a2-1249 Submitted Into the public record in connection with item rz, it on tilg,10.30 Priscilla A. Thbmr son_ l f. Analysis demonstrating consistency and concurrency with the adoptedy C comprehensive neighborhood plan. The future land use element of the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan designates the property Central Business District. The Central Business District designation permits high-density multifamily residential uses with retail uses on louver floors. The designation also permits commercial, recreation, and entertainment facilities. Therefore, the proposed development is consistent with the Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan. The Trak Impact Analysis and Site Utility Study (Tabs 3 and 4 of -Article III, respectively) indicate adequate infrastructure capacity to meet the impact of this development. 3. Major Use Special Permit Concept Plan. a. Relationship of concept plan to existing and proposed surrounding uses. The intent of the Project is to create a new downtown residential neighborhood complete with retail, office, entertainment, dining, and fitness/recreation areas that will be used by the project's residents, workers in the surrounding offices, tourists staying at the nearby hotels, and residents of the burgeoning Brickell area to the south. The proposed residential uses will complement the Central Business District's office buildings in providing much needed area housing for employees. Area employees will' benefit from the increase in retail, dining, entertainment and fitness amenities provided by the Project. Area businesses will benefit from the increased likelihood of workers remaining in downtown after work. Lastly, the Project's layout and tower design will minimize obstructions to the existing view corridors of the office towers in the area. b. Existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan principles and designations. The project conforms to the CBD Central Business District zoning for this property. The City's future land use map designation is consistent with the proposed development. Therefore, no changes are needed to the Zoning Ordinance or Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan to accommodate the development. The applicant is also requesting the approvals and permits described in the Summary of Approvals located in Article I. 4. Development Impact Study. a. Economy of City. The Economic Impact Study is included under Tab 5, Article III. The project will have a favorable impact on the economy of the City during construction and after completion. 9 02,1245 Submitted Into the public record ion connection with item -ion ill Priscilla A. Thompson b. Public Services City Clerk A Traffic Impact Study and Site Utility Study are included under Tabs 3 and 4 of Article III, respectively. The project will have a neutral impact on the City's public services. c. Environment. The property is not located within an Environmental Preservation District. The project will have a neutral impact on the environment. d. Housing supply. The project will result in an increase of 1,500 dwelling units which will address the deficiency in housing in the downtown area. The impact of the project will be favorable to the City. 10 p2-1249 MD I 2 Ar - - - - - - - - - - - 0L 0 C K IRACT .1. PONTDU PLAZA T—T'r DU PONT PLAZA — 8001(99 PAGE L' DU F r 22771 SITE SURVEY SP 4 SCALE 1:70 -4.- �..' �e1l -. Cr �I - - SE. 2M STREET , / - ---- ----- ---- 9 LOT L LQ LUL Y 11 1.1 10 LOT 11 LOT 13 LOT IP LOT I`• DU PONT PLAZA T—T'r DU PONT PLAZA — 8001(99 PAGE L' DU F r 22771 SITE SURVEY SP 4 SCALE 1:70 i ._ x stele m• niaioLs w, T i Mid id 1 1 .v9! 11W �_ Haasa µe.m. 4SANDOUL ,4 ��N� �t : �^ �"? �vd,' ; u.' 'N Y u gym. •,;. �, ., �. _ � �,k►apl��wig� ip � �� J��., para. �'� �� :. cu t Ti �`�. � _ it �� a•�•' '.Y �. Ke.$ fir r K - _ —.� ti'• 7 . d!@ TS �p irati � af1lgt 1 Ai I1 r I•µ �I_.a� d sr:,.��,1!y �.,., IF I � �,. �P ti�,�r� . • o7,00i �J ! SIL= `� �` "� k �� •� �,: T UflT f Phl,70�zse. . r . .F�w G1A. i1r� 'Y7a a'!'r r �'r :i1Y Y� -•'�, +t' Y4�Y9 ;vl[ III 'Q"i� Y6'r �• .. I 'i1�'i •A. .i� r .SSM Aa; 4; s!i ARAL" • r/11 ' , - MY io! CL "l1 1 io! itlT ly 11. "KV 0 410 0000 (boo SCALE P - 30'-0" X 6mmW Jo f. "l1 1 PRCIPOS D S itlT ly 11. "KV 0 410 0000 (boo SCALE P - 30'-0" X 6mmW Jo f. )9t TRANSPORT ANALYSIS PROFESSIONALS, INC. 8701 S.W. 137th AVENUE - SUITE 210 - MIAMI, FL 33183-4498 - TEL 305/385-0777 • FAX 305/385-9997 Submitted Into the public FAX & MAIL record in conne�;o�cn 9�rth rr1 L-11 r � 1t ! Priscilla �. July 2, 2002 City Clerk Mr. Clark P. Turner Chief, Community Planning City of Miami Planning Building & Zoning Department 444 SW 2nd Avenue Third Floor Miami, Florida 33130 RE: One Miami — Traffic Report Major Use Special Permit Dear Mr. Turner: Transport Analysis Professionals, Inc., (TAP) has been requested to prepare a traffic report regarding the proposed One Miami development near the Dupont Plaza area in downtown Miami. The proposed development will be located on three city blocks known as tracts B, C and D (Per Attached Figure). The purpose of this traffic report is to depict traffic conditions between a proposed new development and a development that was never built, but was approved by the city in a MUSP application. The approved MUSP traffic report (attached) was performed by David Plummer and Associates --Master Traffic Study for Major Conditional Use Permit (The Plummer Report) and submitted to the city in September 1998 and subsequently upgraded with new data in July 2000. Background The approved aforementioned MUSP is for a development that included tracts A, B, C and D, adjacent to the Dupont Plaza Hotel in downtown Miami. (The proposed new development does not include tract A.) The approved MUSP included the following land uses and their respective size. Hotel — 300 Rooms - Retail — 400,000 sf - Condos — 300 Units - Apartments — 1,200 Units - Office —1,200;000 sf Planning - Design and Engineering • Accident Reconstruction - State of Florida EB 3766 Mr. Clark P. Turner July 2, 2002 Page 2 Submitted l ; . record in CIGPI (( item f2-11 f5i�laka, A. 4 gg"6 ( X The trip generation for the approved MUSP development used trip rates that were approved by the South Florida Regional Planning Council as part of the Downtown Miami DRI in September 1994. The rates are also known as Increment One Rates as -published in SFRPC's Attachment D-2 and shown in The Plummer Report as Exhibit 5 -Trip Generation, in the approved MUSP for the One Miami project. The rates include a reduction of primary trips to account for internal, transit and7pass-by characteristics for all proposed land uses in Downtown Miami. The Plummer Report estimated that 1,202 new primary trips would be generated by the proposed and approved One Miami project for tracts A through D. The report analyzed existing conditions for the following intersections and roadway links: Intersections: - SE 2"d Avenue & SE 2nd Street - SE 3rd Avenue & SE 2nd Street - SE 2nd Avenue & SE 3rd Street - SE 3rd Avenue & SE 3rd Street - SE 2"d Avenue & SE 4th Street - SE Yd Avenue and SE 4`h Street - Biscayne Boulevard & SE 3rd Street Links: - Biscayne Boulevard just north of SE 2"d Street - Brickell Avenue just south of SE 4`h Street - SE 2nd Avenue just north of SE 2nd Street - SE 2nd Street just west of SE 2"d Avenue - SE 3`d Street just west of SE 2nd Avenue In March 2000, David Plummer and Associates produced a preliminary plan for the city of Miami called the Revitalization of the Economic Gateway to Downtown Miami. The plan outlines possible two-way traffic patterns where one-way patterns exist today. Also, the plan suggests other possible changes such as, acquiring additional right of way and relocating the MetroMover. . The New One Miami Development The new One Miami project will be considerably smaller than the approved development discussed above. At this writing, the following land uses are being considered: Tract C: Residential - 450 units Athletic Club - 15,000 sf Retail - 38,275 sf 02-1249 Mr. Clark P. Turner July 2, 2002 Page 3 Tract B - Entertainment Complex: Retail - 50,000 sf Theaters - 70,000 sf Tract D: Residential - 650 Units Retail - 27,025 sf Tract B: Residential — 400 units Retail - 31,000 sf A summary of all uses is as follows: - Residential - 1,500 Units Retail & Theater - 216,300 sf Athletic Club - 15,000 sf Trip Generation The estimated trip generation between the existing/approved MUSP and the proposed new One Miami development is as follows: (Note: The number of seats for the theater are not known at this time. ITE rates for square feet were used and reduced by 50% to account for internal, transit and pass -by trips. PM Peak Hour Estimated Trip Generation Volume Using Increment One DRI Rates Approved Proposed Land Use One Miami One Miami Hotel* 72 N/A Retail 208 76 Condos 41 54 Apartments 163 150 Theater N/A 133 Office 718 N/A Totals 1,202 413 • Includes 100,000 sf Conference Center. Off' --1249 Mr. Clark P. Turner July 2, 2002 Page 4 0 City Clerk As can be seen above, the proposed new One Miami project without the office component will generate about 66% less traffic than the formerly approved One Miami development. Future Considerations The proposed development will be designed to accommodate either the existing one-way or the proposed two-way traffic circulation. At this juncture, the developer is ready to move forward with the development plan to work with the one-way traffic pattern with the thought that a two-way plan may be in place prior to obtaining construction permits for the city. However, the developer is in full support of the two-way traffic patterns, if deemed to be acceptable by the city. Sincerely, TRANSPORT ANALYSIS PROFESSIONALS, INC. E.B. No. 3766 Richard P. Eichinger Senior Traffic Engineer RPE/mp/2718 cc: Robert Moreira Timothy Weller Bruce Brosch X32.1249 ff ■ SE2ST i I I I I ✓r i v Y 1 1 � D I I FIRST , UNION BUILDING 3ST—�I 4� 4❑ _ uj T-- --- -- --- ., tt �.---- •- -- - - -- -•- of Cw }I w I I rn I _ 4 ST I BIS LVD AY mei — — -- — —l' lift— DUPONT ift DUPONT PLAZA HOTEL MIAMI RIVER BISCAYNE BAY One One Miami Site Location BAYFRONT PARK �lrCHOPIN PLAZA ._—••— , --- —.. INTERCONTINE AL OFFICE INTERCONTINENTAL HOTEL A t (NOTA ART OF) LEGEND B ONE MIAMI PROJECT PARCEL DESIGNATION — TRAFFIC LANE DESIGNATION OD TRAFFIC SIGNAL v �I? -7 W106-104AIII ZZ -1111 MI LOA&101 Project #98157 TRAF3.RPT September 8, 1998 0 NIM IML C i t Y e'fk Prepared by: David Plummer & Associates, Inc. 1750 Ponce de Leon Boulevard Coral Gables, FL 33134 02-x.249 flNI M IAMI TABLE OF CONTENTS Subrnrittrofj iter. P2 -ii J ri CO . s. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................... ES -1 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................. . ......... 1 1.1 Project Background ......... ....................:........ 1 1.2 Study Objective ........................................ 1 1.3 Study Area and Methodology ............................. 3 2.0 DATA COLLECTION .......................................... 4 2.1 Existing Street Network ................................... 4 2.2 Existing Traffic Volumes ................................. 8 2.3 Available Transit Services ................................ 9 2.4 Existing Pedestrian Services .............................. 9 3.0 FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS .............................. 11 3.1 Site Trip Generation ................................... 11 3.2 Modal Split/Transit Services ............................. 12 3.3 Committed Projects .................................... 12 3.4 Trip Assignment and Distribution ......................... 14 3.5 Future Roadway Traffic Volumes ......................... 16 3.6 Planned Roadway and Transit Improvements ............... 16 3.7 Urbanized Street System ............................... 18 4.0 CONCLUSION ............................................ 19 02=1249 ON[ MIAML LIST OF EXHIBITS i��ts� rpz l ► _ �� _i�19.� ��- nn �FC i?b J �iY..t ti 4 � :e Y�F f a,�•�,.p 4'1 :sty C:erk. Exhibit 1 - Location Map ............................................ 2 Exhibit 2 - Summary of One Miami Development Plan .................... 1 Exhibit 3 - Existing Lane Configuration and Right -of -Way .................. 5 Exhibit 4 - Summary of the 1998 Study Roadways Traffic Volume Conditions .................................................... 8 Exhibit 5 - Project Trip Generation ................................... 11 Exhibit 6 - Summary of Committed and Proposed Developments in Downtown Miami......................................... ...... 13 Exhibit 7 - Cardinal Distribution for TAZ 664 & 665 ...................... 15 Exhibit 8 - Project Trip Assignment ................................... 15 Exhibit 9 - DDA Recommended Priority Transportation Improvements ....... 16 APPENDICES Appendix A - 1998 Raw Traffic Volume Count Appendix B - 1997 Weekly Volume Factor Category Report Appendix C - 1997 Weekly Axle Factor Category Report Appendix D - Transit Routes Serving Downtown Miami Appendix E - Attachment D1: Trip Generation Rates for Downtown DRI Appendix F - Mode Splits in the Downtown DRI Appendix G - Cardinal Trip Distribution a2-1249 ONE M IAML EXECUTIVE SUMMARY t city Cierk One Miami (ONE MIAM1) project .is a proposed mixed use development located in Downtown Miami, Florida. The development plan consists of a 300 -room hotel, 400,000 square feet (SF) of retail, 300 condominium units, 1,200 rental apartment units, and 1,200,000 SF of office space. The proposed project would occupy four parcels of land adjacent to the DuPont Plaza Hotel in Downtown Miami. Parking spaces will be provided consistent with the requirements of the City of Miami. Parking beyond that required for the land uses will be provided to replace the on-site spaces eliminated by this development. An assessment of the traffic conditions and parameters associated with One Miami was performed in consultation with the City of Miami. This report is the Master Traffic Study. The traffic conditions and parameters in the project area are established in this study. This will be the basis for the traffic studies required for the project build -out and construction phases which will be part of subsequent Major Use Special Permit (MUSP) process. This Master. Traffic Study describes existing and future traffic conditions on the subject roadway segments (links) and includes descriptions of the major roadways serving the project sites. Existing and future transit and pedestrian conditions in the downtown area, as well as the project site, are also presented. The trips generated by the proposed development were estimated using the trip generation rates established by the Downtown Miami Development of Regional Impact (DRI). It was estimated that the proposed project would generate approximately 1,202 motor vehicles per hour during the PM peak period. Transit and pedestrian trips to the project may increase in the future as the City becomes more urbanized. However, adjustments to the trip generation rates established in the Downtown Miami DRI to compensate for the anticipated increase in transit and pedestrian rates were not considered for this study. A list of committed developments Miami One Center - Master Traffic Study ES -1 02-1249 ON.[ M- I AM I - in the area was identified. Recommended priority transportation improvement projects in Downtown Miami for the next 10 years were also listed in this study. The existing street network surrounding the project site is a one-way system. This system provides an effective movement of traffic from the 1-95 Ramps to Downtown Miami. There has been recent recognition that the existing street system favors the morning arrival trips. A build out traffic analysis for this project will be submitted to the City at the time that building plans are submitted to the City in connection with the anticipated MUSP modifications. At such time, a detailed traffic analysis will be submitted with a recommendation regarding possible upgrades to the existing street system. - Miami One Center - Master Traffic Study ES -2 d2=1249 ONE M IAML 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Project Background Submitted lrto ho puVic vL mi rk The proposed project, referred to as One Miami, would occupy four parcels of land adjacent to the DuPont Plaza Hotel in Downtown Miami. Exhibit 1 shows the proposed. project location. The development plan (summarized in Exhibit 2) consists of several buildings that include a 300 -room hotel, 400,000 square feet (SF) retail, 300 condominium units, 1,200 rental apartment units, and 1,200,000 SF office space. The proposed plan would provide parking spaces for each land use as required by the City. Additional parking will also be provided to replace the on-site spaces eliminated by the proposed development. 1.2 Exhibit 2: Summary of One Miami Development Plan Land Use No. Of Units No. of Parkin Hotel 300 Rooms 225 Conference Center 100,000 Square 100 High -Rise Condominiums 300 Dwelling Units 600 High -Rise Apartments 1,200 Dwelling Units 1,500 Office 1,200,000 Square 2,000 Retail 400,000 Square 900 Commercial Parking 1,675 Total Parking 7,000 Study Objective The objective of this Master Traffic Study is to define the transportation conditions in the project area. The transportation conditions will be the basis for the build out and incremental traffic studies required in the Major Use Special Permit (MUSP) process. One Miami - Master Traffic Study Page 1 02-1249 ONE MIAML Submiffn,d the, public itern,�L-II i+l�lq�y6?- 2 02-1249 ONI M IAML 1.3 Study Area and Methodology The scope and methodology for this study were developed in consultation with the City of Miami's planning staff. It was agreed that this Master Traffic Study would identify the following transportation conditions: • Existing street network • Existing traffic volumes • Available transit service • Existing pedestrian service • Site trip generation • Trip distribution • Modal split/transit service • Committed projects • Planned roadway and transit improvements • Urbanized street systems This study describes the existing traffic conditions along the roadway segments (links) located at the perimeter of the project area that control the inbound and outbound traffic. The Gateway streets and the major roadway segments investigated in this study were: • Brickell Avenue south of SE 4th Street, • SE 2nd Avenue north of SE 2nd Street, • SE 2nd Street west of SE 2nd Avenue, • Biscayne Boulevard north of SE 2nd Street, and • SE 3rd Street/1-95 ramps west of SE 2nd Avenue. One Miami - Master Traffic Study Page 3 02-1249 Y e rn gyp,,-sy ii_ qq A. // q City Clerk The scope and methodology for this study were developed in consultation with the City of Miami's planning staff. It was agreed that this Master Traffic Study would identify the following transportation conditions: • Existing street network • Existing traffic volumes • Available transit service • Existing pedestrian service • Site trip generation • Trip distribution • Modal split/transit service • Committed projects • Planned roadway and transit improvements • Urbanized street systems This study describes the existing traffic conditions along the roadway segments (links) located at the perimeter of the project area that control the inbound and outbound traffic. The Gateway streets and the major roadway segments investigated in this study were: • Brickell Avenue south of SE 4th Street, • SE 2nd Avenue north of SE 2nd Street, • SE 2nd Street west of SE 2nd Avenue, • Biscayne Boulevard north of SE 2nd Street, and • SE 3rd Street/1-95 ramps west of SE 2nd Avenue. One Miami - Master Traffic Study Page 3 02-1249 ONIMIAML 2.0 DATA COLLECTION 2.1 Existing Street Network IC p•f T �, 04,x' 4 :. � � ��'. Jerk The major roadways serving and adjacent to the project site are state designated routes (Brickell Avenue, SE 2 Street; SE 2 Avenue, Biscayne Boulevard, and SE 4th Street/Biscayne Boulevard Way). The rights-of-way (R -O -W) along these roads are public dedications, but are not the State's R -O -W. Nevertheless, the FDOT is responsible for the operation of these routes with the exception of SE 3rd Street and SE 3rd Avenue. These two roadways are public dedications under the City's jurisdiction. Exhibit 3 shows the existing rights-of-way and lane configurations within the project area. Brickell Avenue Brickell Avenue is one of the major arterials in Downtown Miami and connects the Central Business District (CBD) and the Brickell Area. It is a 6 -lane, divided roadway with a raised median. Brickell Avenue in the immediate vicinity to the project site (south of SE 4th Street over the Miami River) operates as a two-way, 5 -lane (2 - northbound lanes and 3 -southbound lanes), divided roadway. The bridge is 6 lanes wide but the northbound lanes narrow to 2 lanes due to right-of-way constraints. The roadway then widens to a 6 -lane divided section with a landscaped median south of the Miami River. The extension of Brickell Avenue north of SE 4th Street is SE 2nd Avenue. Northbound traffic on Brickell Avenue must tum right onto eastbound SE 4th Street, which extends east to become Biscayne Boulevard Way. The posted speed limit is 30 miles per hour (mph). On -street parking is not permitted along Brickell Avenue within the study limits. One Miami - Master Traffic Study Page 4 02-1249 II pop P S.E. 2 St I L -- — -- — -- — -- — -- — -- — -- — ---- T —L—J .. . .. . .. . . 4 FIRST UNION BUILDING tit — -------- — -- — -- — -- — -- — -- B, V - - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - - w DUPONT PLAZA HOTEL uj 1 --MIAMI RIVER dp DAVID PLUMMER 8 ASSOCIATES. K.1 TAX&M,4114ft - CIVIL - IIIIIK"Aft - IWIMUNIAL MIAMI ONE CENTRE BAYFRONT PARK F-7 �TiNTJe CHOPIN PLAZA T RCONTINE NTAL OFFICE INTERCONTINENTAL l' HOTEL I LEGEND BISCAYNE BAY p PROJECT SITE - - I RIGHT Of WAY 413 TRAFFIC SIGNAL v E H3 EXISTING LANE CONFIGURATION AND RIGHT OF WAY ;:v @ CD 0 77 =3 ON E M-1 AML WOF-MM-3. • Submitted Into Uhm public record, i r �; a ��, ..il.i..� itemry_2-,�1 crf, risci,la A. City Clerk Biscayne Boulevard is also a major arterial in Downtown Miami. It is a two-way, divided arterial. The number of lanes varies from 6 to 8 within the downtown area. Biscayne Boulevard between SE 2nd Street and NE 5th Street has a wide median, which is operated as municipal parking lots by the Miami Parking System. It provides the CBD area with connectivity to 1-395 and Miami Beach. On -street metered parking is permitted on limited portions of the Biscayne Boulevard southbound approach. The elevated Metromover runs along the Biscayne Boulevard median between SE 2nd Street and NE 1st Street. The Metromover's Bayfront Park Station is located on Biscayne Boulevard in the vicinity of SE 2nd Street. Biscayne Boulevard becomes a one-way northbound roadway in the immediate vicinity of the project site (between SE 4th Street and SE 2nd Street). The posted speed limit within the study area is 30 mph. SE/NE 2nd Avenue SE/NE 2nd Avenue is a 3 -lane, one-way southbound roadway that provides Downtown Miami with access to the interstate highways 1-395 and 1-95. The number of lanes in the immediate vicinity of the study area varies from 3 (north of SE 2nd Street) to 5 lanes (between SE 3rd Street and SE 4th Street). SE 2nd Avenue provides access to the 1-95 ramps via SE 3rd Street. SE 2nd Avenue extends south of SE 4th Street to become Brickell Avenue. On -street parking is not permitted on either side of SE 2nd Avenue. The posted speed limit is 30 mph. SEINE 3rd Avenue SE 3rd Avenue is a 3 -lane, one-way northbound arterial between SE 4th Street to the south and Flagler Street to the north. It becomes NE 3rd Avenue north of Flagler One Miami - Master Traffic Study Page 6 02-1249 ONEMIAML P soncity Clerk Street and terminates at NE 2nd Street. On -street parking is permitted on certain portions of SE 3rd Avenue. The posted speed limit is 30 mph. SE 2nd Street SE 2nd Street is a westbound one-way street. It starts as a 5 -lane section between Biscayne Boulevard and SE 3rd Avenue, and narrows to 2 lanes west of SE 2nd Avenue. A substantial percentage of SE 2nd Avenue traffic is destined for 1-95 via SE 2nd Avenue and SE 3rd Street. The posted speed limit is 30 mph. On -street parking is not permitted along SE 2nd Street within the study limits. SE 3rd Street SE 3rd Street west of SE 2nd Avenue is a two-way, 4 -lane; divided roadway with a posted speed limit of 30 mph. SE 3rd Street provides direct access (on-ramp/off- ramp) to 1-95. The Miami Metromover is located centerline of SE 3rd Street between SE 2nd Avenue and Biscayne Boulevard. SE 3rd Street is a 2 -lane,' one-way eastbound roadway east of SE 2nd Avenue and is divided by the Metromover's elevated rail structure. On -street parking is not permitted on either sides of the roadway. SE 4th Street is a 4 -lane, one-way eastbound roadway between SE 2nd Avenue and SE 3rd Avenue. It extends east to become Biscayne Boulevard Way between SE 3rd Avenue and Biscayne Boulevard. Biscayne Boulevard Way is a 2 -lane, one-way eastbound roadway. SE 4th Street/Biscayne Boulevard Way is the main access for Brickell Avenue traffic heading north into the CBD area via Biscayne Boulevard. On - street metered parking is permitted on both sides of Biscayne Boulevard Way. The posted speed limit is 30 mph. One Miami - Master Traffic Study Page 7 02-1249 ON[ M IAML 2.2 Existing Traffic Volumes Suter:,Itk;red Byrn U)U i9C; s 'Mth i s PZ 1PHSGiii91 5 y� d' A. t' :1 �otry-�-- City Clerk Twenty-four hour traffic volume counts were obtained by counting machines located at the study area main access roadways serving the project site (raw traffic volume counts are presented in Appendix A): Biscayne Boulevard, Brickell Avenue, SE 2nd Avenue, SE 2nd Street, and SE 3rd Street/1-95 ramps. Volume adjustment factors were obtained from the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) (see Appendix B for details). A volume adjustment factor of 1.02 (for 1997 Dade Countywide) which corresponds to the date of the count and a weekly axle factor of 0.99 (for Biscayne Boulevard, see Appendix C) were used to adjust the raw traffic counts to average annual conditions. Exhibit 4 provides a summary of the 1998 average annual daily traffic (AADT) counts and peak period traffic volumes for the locations counted for this study. Exhibit 4: Summary of the 1998 Study Roadways Traffic Volume Conditions Roadway AADT AM Peak PM Peak K -Factor D -Factor Biscayne Boulevard just 31,400 2,220 vph 2,619 vph 8.3% 51% north of SE 2nd St. (8:15 - 9:15) (5:00 - 6:00) SB Brickell Avenue 34,140 2,730 vph 2,801 vph 8.2% 55% just south of SE 4th St. (8:i5-9:15) (5:00-6:00) SB SE 2nd Avenue 7,760 653 vph 704 vph 9.1% 100% just north of SE 2nd St. (8:30 - 9:30) (5:15 - 6:15) SB SE 2nd Street 6,040 574 vph 480 vph 9.5% 100% just west of SE 2nd Ave (8:15 - 9:15) (5:15 - 6:15) WB SE 3rd Street 31,620 3,249 vph 2,395 vph 1(5:15 10.3% 63% just west of SE 2nd Ave (8:15 - 9:15) - 6:15) WB Notes The FDOT Weekly Volume Adjustment Factor was used based on the Countywide category. AADT - Average Annual Daily Traffic (2 -way) = Average Daily Traffic (ADT) x Seasonal Factor (SF) x Axle Factor (AF) vph - Vehicles per hour D - peak hour directional distribution percentage K - peak to daily ratio SB - Southbound WB - Westbound One Miami - Master Traffic Study Page 8 02-1249 ONIMIAML 2.3 Available Transit Services recon item PZ 11 Downtown Miami is one of the areas in Miami -Dade County that is well served by transit services such as Metrobus, Metrorail, and Metromover. There are several Metrobus routes serving the downtown area. The Metrorail Government Centre Station is the busiest station in the County and is the terminus for northbound and southbound trips. Metromover serves the downtown area with several stations within the CBD and Brickell Areas. Appendix D shows the existing Metromover, Metrobus, and Metrorail service routes in Downtown Miami. The area where the- proposed project is located is also well served by -several bus routes including routes S, 48, and 95. During the PM Peak period these routes operate at different schedules and have headways ranging between 5 and 60 minutes. The James. L. Knight Convention Centre Metromover Station and Bayfront Park Metromover Station are located within a walking distance of the project site. 2.4 Existing Pedestrian Services Pedestrian activity is an essential element in the Downtown Miami area. There is currently significant pedestrian activities within the downtown area. The one-way system of streets within the site area makes pedestrian movement uncomfortable. Due to the nature and location of the project, pedestrian activity between the project's various land uses, the Miami Central Business District (CBD), and other nearby destinations should be an important factor. There are several proposed projects that are geared toward improving pedestrian linkages in the downtown area. Examples of these project include the Riverwalk, One Miami - Master Traffic Study Page 9 ONEMIAML rc `c'3,; d .r6 g o � a ra ^s .^ P t ,. v � '.irr 'ah item City Clerk Baywalk, Flagler Street roadway improvements, and pedestrian crosswalks on Biscayne Boulevard at 4th Street, 7th Street, and 9th Street. Another proposed project is the enhancement of the critical linkages under the 1-395 Expressway overpass north of the Performing Arts Centre at Biscayne Boulevard, NE 2nd Avenue, NE 1 st Avenue, and Miami Avenue (source: City News Miami newsletter by DDA). Several roadways in Downtown Miami were identified as current or future "Major Pedestrian Linkages" between parking reserves and other destinations (source: City News Miami newsletter by DDA). These are: SE 4th Street, SE 3rd Avenue, SE 2nd Street, Biscayne Boulevard, NE 4th Street, NE 7th Street, and NE 9th Street. In conclusion, the Downtown Miami area, as well as the project area experience a significant pedestrian activity. This pedestrian activity is expected to increase in the future as a result of several improvement programs and plans. One Miami - Master Traffic Study Page 10 02-1249 OHL M I AM I- Append.ix B Submitted Into the public rea-vd in conne---,i,C�n item f zAj on ti -19-o> Priscilla A. Til,.r,r,'Tv.son City Berk 1997 Weekly Volume Factor Category Report 02-71249 CCD CD 3 i CT 1997 Weekly Volume Factor Category Report = _ N County: 87 - DME CL 0 � Q Week Dates 0700 8719 8739 8767 `' DME COUHTYWIDE DME I195 • DME I395 DME HEFT 1.03 1 01/01/97 - 01/06/97 0.99 1.01 1.01 1.06 2 01/05/97 - 01/11/97 1.00 1.02 1.02 1.06 3 01/12/97 - 01/10/97 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.03 6 01/19/97 - 01/29/97 1.01 1.00 1.00 1.01 5 01/26/97 - 02/01/97 1.00 0.98 0.96 1.00 6 02/02/97 - 02/06/97 0.90 0.96 0.96 0.99 7 02/09/97 - 02/15/97 0.97 0.96 0.96 0.98 9 02/16/97 - 02/22/97 0.97 0.96 0.96 9 02/29/97 - 03/01/97 0.97 0.95 0.95 0:97 0.96 10 03/02/97 - 03/09/97 0.97 0.95 0.95 0.95 11 03/09/97 - 03/15/97 0.97 0.95 0.95 0.96 12 03/16/97 - 03/22/97 0.97 0.96 0.96 0,97 13 03/23/97 - 03/29/97 0.97 0,97 0.97 0,90 16 03/30/97 - 06/05/97 0.96 0.99 0.99 0.99 15 06/06/97 - 06/12/97 0.96 0.90 0.99 1.00 16 01/13/97 - 06/19/97 0.98 0.99 0.99 17 06/20/97 - 01/26/97 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 06/27/97 - 05/03/97 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.01 19 05/06/97 - 05/10/97 0.99 1.01 1.01 1.01 20 05/11/97 - 05/17/97 1.00 1.01 1.01 1.01 21 05/19/97 - 05/26/97 1.00 1.02 1.02 1.01 22 05/29/97 - 05/31/97 1.01 1.02 1.02 1.01 23 06/01/97 - 06/07/97 1.02 1.03 1.03 1.01 26 06/09/97 - 06/16/97 1.02 i.03 1.03 1.00 25 06/15/97 - 06/21/97 1.03 1.03 1.03 26 06/22/97 - 06/28/97 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.00 , 1.00 27 06/29/97 - 07/05/97 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.00 29 07/06/97 - 07/12/97 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.00 29 07/13/97 - 07/19/97 1.03 1.02 1.02 1.00 30 07/20/97 - 07/26/97 1.03 1.02 1.02 0.99 31 07/27/97 - 06/02/97 1.03 1.02 1.02 0.99 32 09/03/97 - 06/09/97 1.02 1.03 1.03 0.99 33 06/10/97 - 00/16/97 1.02 1.03 1.03 0.99 36 06/17/97 - 00/23/97 1.03 1.03 1.03 0.99 35 09/26/97 - 06/30/97 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.00 36 09/31/97 - 09/06/97 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.00 37 09/07/97 - 09/13/97 1.03 1.06 1.01 1.01 39 09/11/97 - 09/20/97 1.03 1.06 1.06 1.00 39 09/21/97 - 09/27/97 1.02 1.03 1.03 1.00 60 09/29/97 - 10/06/97 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.00 11 10/05/97 - 10/11/97 1.01 1.01 1.01 0.99 62 10/12/97 - 10/10/97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 63 10/19/97 - 10/23/97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 61 10/26/97 - 11/01/97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 65 11/02/97 - 11/09/97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.01 16 11/09/97 - 11/15/97 1.00 1.01 1.01 1.02 67 11/16/97 - 11/22/97 1.00 1.01 1.01 1.02 IB 11/23/97 - 11/29/97 1.00 1.01 1.01 1.03 69 11/30/97 - 12/06/97 0.99 1.01 1.01 1.06 ' 50 12/07/97 - 12/13/97 0.99 1.01 1.01 X.05 51 12/16/97 - 12/20/97 0.99 1.01 1.01 1.06 52 12/21/97 - 12/27/97 1.00 1.02 1.02 53 12/28/97 - 12/31/97 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.06 03 -<rob -1990 08:51:61 Page 1 6_87_SVWOY.TXT CCD CD 3 i CT CL = _ N 3 CD CL 0 � Q 0 CD `' �' n. ONE M.IAMI- Appendix C Submitted Into the public record in connc-.,."vt itern PrisbNa A. 1997 Weekly Axle .Factor Category Report 02-1249 '7 cn CD 1997 Meekly Jule Factor Category Report County: 07 - DAD►. cn Week Dates 6706 0707 8708 8709 SR 94 SR 878 SR S/SO DIXIE RWY RA S/BISChYIIE BLVD 1 01/01/97 - 01/04/97 0.90 0.94 0.95 0.99 2 01/05/91 - 01/11/97 0.90 0.94 0.93 0.99 3 01/12/97 - 01/18/97 0.98 0.94 0:95 0.99 4 01/19/97 - 01/2S/91 0.96 0.94 OAS .0.99 5 01/26/97 - 02/01/97 0.90 0.94 0.95 0.99 6 02/02/97 - 02/08/97 0.98 0.94 0.95 0.99 7 02/09/97 - 02/19/97 0.90 0.94 0.95 0.99 6 02/16/97 - 02/22/97 0.98 0.94 0.93 0,99 9 02/23/97 - 03/01/97 0.98 0.94 0.95 0.99 10 03/02/97 - 03/06/97 0.96 0.94 0.95 0.99 11 03/09/97 - 03/15/97 0.98 0.94 0.93 0.99 12 03/16/97 - 03/22/97 0.98 ..0.94 0.93 0.99 13 03/23/97 - 03/29/97 0.98 0.94 0.95 0.99 14 03/30/97 - 04/05/97 0.98 0.94 0.95 0.99 13 04/06/97 - 04/12/97 0.98 0.94 0.95 0.99 16 04/13/97 - 04/19/97 0.98 0.94 0.93 0.99 17 04/20/97 - 04/26/97 0.98 0.94 0.95 0.99 10 04/27/97 - 03/03/97 0.98 0.94 0.93 0.99 19 03/04/97 - 05/10/97 0.98 0.94 0.95 0.99 20 05/11/97 - 03/17/97 0.98 0.94 0.95 0.99 21 05/10/97 - 03/24/97 0.96 0.94 0.93 0.99 22 03/25/97 - 03/31/97 0.98 0.94 0.95 0.99 23 06/01/97 - 06/07/97 0.98 0.94 0.95 0.99 24 06/08/97 - 06/14/97 0.98 0.94 0.95 0.99 25 06/13/97 - 06/21/97 0.98 0.94 0.93 0.99 26 06/22/97 - 06/28/97 0.98 0.94 0.95 0.99 27 06/29/97 - 07/05/97 0.98 0.94 0.95 0.99 20 07/06/97 - 07/12/97 0.98 0.94 0.95 0,99 29 07/13/97 - 07/19/97 0.98 0.94 0.95 0.99 30 07/20/97 - 07/26/97 0.98 0.94 0.95 0.99 31 07/27/97 - 08/02/97 0.98 0.94 0.95 0.99 32 09/03/97 - 00/09/97 0.98 0.94 0.93 0.99 33 08/10/97 - 08/14/97 0.90 0.94 0.93 - 0.99 34 06/17/97 - 00/21/97 0194 0.94 0.95 0.99 3S 00/24/97 - 00/30/97 0.98 0.94 0.99 0.99 36 00/31/97 - 09/04/97 0.90 0,94 0.93 0.99 37 09/07/97 - 09/13/97 0.90 0.94 0.93 0.99 30 09/14/97 - 09/20/97 0.96 0.94 0.95 0.99 39 09/21/97 - 09/27/97 0.98 0.94 0.93 0.99 40 09/28/97 - 10/04/97 0.90 0.94 0.95 0.99 41 10/03/97 - 10/11/97 0.98 0.94 0.95 0.99 42 10/12/97 - 10/10/97 0.98 0.94 0.95 0.99 43 10/19/97 - 10/2S/97 O.Se 0.94 0.95 0.99 44 10/26/97 - 11/01/97 0.90 0.94 0.95 0.99 45 11/02/97 - 11/08/91 0.96 0.94 0.95 0.99 46 11/09/97 - 11/15/97 0.99 0.94 0.95 0.99 47 11/16/97 - 11/22/97 0.96 0.94 0.95 0.99 4e 11/23/97 - 11/29/97 0.90 0.94 0.95 0.99 49 11/30/97 - 12/06/97 0.90 0.94 0.93 0.99 , 30 12/07/97 - 12/13/27 0.90 0.94 0.95 0.99 51 12/14/97 - 12/20/91 0.90 0.94 0.93 1 Q'.99 32 12/21/97 - 12/27/97 0.98 0.94 0.93 0.99 33 12/28/97 - 12/31/97 0.98 0.94 0.95 0.99 16 -Feb -1998 09:10:17 Page 2 6_87_AXWOY.TXT '7 cn CD cn Z t t,t .... w -m E Q f�J ONE M I AM L. Appendix D Submitted Into the public reccrd in conne-cfcn v7iflh . item PZ -11 Priscilla A. Tho,,�tpson City Clerk Transit Routes Serving Downtown Miami 0-1249 ONI M I AM L U 0 M14 -led In"o item Priscilla A. City Clerk Id IC j NE IS St K -T arm a 2.21.$'W4 ftw0__N1V 14 S' 4- a Fma I ST F"a Vrl LO arm --.a ftwe I F"U I Or.wo, I fywv VACA.111W C4 - I 4a 6. to K -T 210 all ' 26 0 21 9S.C.11 NwIl St C;' r I. 4 Is K.T J.ff.as Park 2*� 82at I �'; MAX tw to S' 0.14 t t a z 4's W.&W-96 3-w-44-96 C -s -max C'.S.IAA% Is A T7 W, K.741 W-0 117.21.91 K -T 0 y��Ww 6 S. Is l.10 21.1ft a A. says, to MarW ftce C-9 gals us. I" 1 .2.4.74 a= �,a 4.4 !SO$ Court C 0 K-1 House 117, *-an 9.10 .4rol K -F a 77 U77 49i =Ikj! S.T I 4 Park 2"w— I V 0000- Gap s 2s, w TT.ti ITS 2-7111 –7---- S FE 2 > DOW TOW L M M1, 7z 10 Existing Transit Services in Downtown Miami 02-1249 ONE M IAML Appendix E Submitted Into tl�e��t bft su reeord .W�n� item prisCilla A. Gity Gierk Attachment D1: Trip Generation Rates for Downtown DRI 02-1249 Table -1 IANO O31•E2l]W161.9AT1S 1`011 WUTOVN Dot (per bels 64vare hHape, except as elMrwll! IMlcalad) 10MIa for calc6latiM 1h • submit rail office Astall/ Service Natal (per 11611/4ectal (par i.v.) tanventlM Viwlelale/ 1elvstrial lastitvtleeal Attractl"s/ Recreationaeliltle/ (per feat) Nerina Orrice Natal)/Service Nele) (per re") i" �" Rull/ntlal (per 4.0.) Gnvatta0 YMluele/IMvltrial 6lllitelmal '�Attnctlaru/Aecrut IM 1 6.000591! CMil9 0.204 0.1360563 0.000114 o ON441 0.00132 1�( O.000S9IS 1.0000 0.1612 311.5104 227.32" 0.190s 0.2211 9.2055 o.Mosif 1.1511 1.0000 349.2100 261.15011 0.2191 0.2531 2.5434 0.202 0.0030 0.0026 1.0000 0.6735 4.0006 0.0001 0.0065 0,1160563 0.004+ 0.0036 1.1111 1.0000 0.0001 0.0010 0.0091 0 1360563 5.2500 4.5526 I,JTI.ftf1 1,193.4763 1.0000 1.1614 11.1719 0000111 4.5204 3.9199 I.11tS.11/f 1,/27.6156 0.1618 1.0000 9.1191 0.00131 6.1l�/ 0.3932 191.030] 101.0130 6.0164 6.1003 1.0000 0 0020511 0.2907 0.2121 1111.1194 04.045: O.OSS4 0.0141 0.6411 00005915 0,7 uT'slo+ null 0.190s 0.2212 2. OSS (per seat) l�tlna nct11t1.1 0.o0M0611 0 00059115 3.4319 1,M 3.9669 1.1512 6.6102 LM 0.0151 0.0014 11.0596 9.2500 15.5491 1.5201 1.5591 LM Low 0.190 1.1399 1__0000 10MIa for calc6latiM 1h • submit rail . 6 and f beth r•pr•uet the maker of to past New lateraal Inter Vehicle Trip tM! per Mit of lank all derived from the Oovataet 111041 A.O.A. (n p Cr `1`M✓ CL Lx3V �� t`�i 1`D 7� F� �_ G �. ONE MIAMI Appendix F Submitted 'Irto Pub reco, co nn, n n itern -P-2 0 prisciija A. Mode Splits in the Downtown DRI 92-1249 ONIMIAML Submitted into the � N� c Item�- , �� ..�Q Y z I � PrlsG111a A. s City Clark U -w -N 111[ ILII LOW 1411 IN71�34 Area auaa edl I"I 011 Goat CID last •w it" 14c1a4, Ill tow qY! IU ra4 4 1 1 7 3 1 3 mat M11% C•lOL IN 1112 Of 4.0 1.311 1.211 4.141 1.111 -1.211 Wv etwor1411t N¢wl1e #1944&4 IIt1I1 J"l No 4.44 1.442 1.241 1.444 1.141 1.111 low 1 4-----1 1112 a 1 no it 1.44 1.412 1.213 1.311 1.171 1.11• IpparNlll 1 1"142 Il1uw11ai 1 1 2441 a 1 1 Mlll tun -1 NK at We tOl/0----- Ott---------- -...----- 1.04$1.441 haw ft" ala we (alma.# talared taw -eq labs"/ IAbs"t tach Area trip 4111 1.1rIN trip@ tat.! Into 1. 1.133 1.311 4.44 CaavralM factor ----1 1.4% 1.344 1.43 It 1.01 1.414 1.31 1.14 4.112 1.371 I.m IJraaalll 1.744 hr.It.laerrdl L L141 P1/Ia111 Iala1 1 MIN L wt 1 1 1 1.42 1 1 4.111 1.313 1.421 4.713 1.211 11117 i IT4J I.0 1451 733 31 411 N it I2 out 3 1 3111 1.44 2211 lite it 1711 131 34 11 WN 14 1 illy 4.44 4t" 4373 241 3442 211 IT 744 •1117 4 3147 I.N 3131 MI lot 2442 Ill 33 123 11117 4 444 4.44 113 7$ 711 40 31 ll 71 -0111 2 111734 1.21 ti142 IiiS 373 1111 143 311 471 CM 2 3 3314 1.0 214 2111 3t 1114 IN 3t lit all 3 4111 1.41 2143 1141 31 list 131 13 I" 014 3 1411 4.47 3111 1275 3t 2123 111 33 171 Cil 5 3 24714 1.41 It211 1941 st 1446 112 244 344 CID 3 1341 4.21 012 3136 U 2144 734 77 IN NICIILL 1 3 111 4.21 7341 234 51 544 43 is H aluta 2 3 39"1 1.21 31512 21393 U 31373 1741 324 1223 IIICIILL 7 7 13444 1.2t 35132 75411 71 23111 2441 414 1434 N IMLL 4 3 fill 4.21 "a 4755 31 4042 341 144 741 hll ! / 1.09 / / u 4 1 t / 1 1 1.0 4 1 IL 1 1 • t t 1 0.0 1 1 St 1 1 1 • 1111 3344 3331 1131 3717 111 37 173 "Kim 11 323 11414) 11111 i 21334 2231 611 1311 micull 17114 Rllt sum MIT 4111 1131 2111 Motown IISU 11133 744 NOT 712 133 331 Mt 4 4 4 / 1 1 1 Pull AM 114311 sum 11171 pNl 1141 3144 7112 lett IM 1044 IY IMI it" w 1 eft trip W4 0r11 trips M 1111 •1 Ire Ver lab"W AIM�1 I./N 1.04$1.441 4.331 1.14 1.211 1.311 LOU I.843 Wit 4.711 1.114 1.40 1.133 1.311 4.44 &211 1.4% 1.344 4.141 4.341 1.01 4.10 4.331 1.412 4.112 1.371 I.m 1.273 1.744 LHI L141 4.314 1.431 1.111 1.447 L"? 1.213 4.417 4.111 1.313 1.421 4.713 1.211 1. H2 1.111 4.311 4.441 4.1111.411 4.441 1.44/ /.Mt 1.111 /.441 4.111 4.111 4.44/ 1.411 4.111 I 1 1 3 1 2 7 1 2 1 1 7 02-1249 ONfMIAMI- Appendix G 0 01 c Submitte,d, intor C,i�,y Clerk Cardinal Trip Distribution 02-1249 ONIMIAML Submitted Into the pubiar record in items _ez�.�� F .��..-1.1.-0? risb,'Ha A. Uy Cak x*r-h& xj,Emawists6 xwwis . C MP 02-1249 2000 STAM Or 2015 LRTP - ALTSRNATIVS 00d DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBZTTION SUMMARY ORIGIN (------------- CARDIJ= DIRSLTIONS------------- TOTAL ZONE wx on Sss SSS ssw MSM MNM Nm 661 TRIPS 18S 121 $1 :. 107 313 15: 252 1222 PSRC3WT 15.14 9.90 2.S4 4.42 8.76 25.61 13.01 20.61 662 TRIPS 38 10 1 8 15 31 15 49 167 PSRCZWT 22.75 3.99 .60 4.79 8.98 18.56 8.98 29.34 663 TRIPS 334 lS5 S7 149 196 S25 379 452 -2237 PSRCBIiT 14.93 6.93 2.55 6.66 8.31 23.47 16.94 20.21 664 TRIPS 936 436 139' 114 1074 2201 1769 1767 8436 PSRC W 11.10 5.17 1.6S 1.35 12.73 26.09 20.97 20.95 665 TRIPS 231 130 5 30 21S 469 362 388 1830 PSRCSNT 12.62 7.10 .27 1.64 11.75 25.63 19.78 21.20 666 TRIPS 3S4 199 110 71 SSO 1543 2.361 1248 5436 PSRCBNT 6.51 3.66 2.02 1.31 10.12 28.38 25.04 22.96 667 TRIPS 1268 476 81 10S 1094 2596 2066 2576 10264 PERCENT 12.35 4.66 .79 1.02 10.66 25.29 20.13 25.10 668 TRIPS 193 168 7 32 278 852 957 1042 3529 PS3t0w 5.47 4.76 .20 .91 7.88 24.14 27.12 29.53 669 TRIPS 3873 1054 19 285 1426 6620 5423. 6804 25504 PSRCRNT 15.19 4.13 .07 1.12 5.59 25.96 21.26 26.68 670 TRIPS 894 167 10 42 117 1045 955 1349 4579 PSRCzWT 19.52 3.6S .22 .92 2.56 22.82 20.86 29.46 671 TRIPS 2843 339 2S 53 87 1245 2.287 1436 7315 PSRCZR,w 38.87 4.63 .34 .72 1.19 17.02 17.59 13.63 672 TRIPS 650 202 6 33 59 368 217 39S 2000 PSRC WT 32.50 10.10 .30 1.65 2.95 16.40 14.35 19.75 673 TRIPS 783 242 25 41 177 852 675 815 3610 PSRC = 21.69 6.70 .69 1.14 4.90 23.60 18.70 22.58 674 TRIPS 3158 898 536 259 972 4427 2961 3614 16795 PSRCSNT 18.80 S.11 3.19 1.60 5.79 26.36 17.63 21.52 675 TRIPS 1720 675 209 477 964 2695 2094 2717 11545 PERCEPT 14.90 5.85 1.81 4.13 8.33 23.34 18.09 23.53 02-1249 ON M IAM l;. Submitted Int the public re °�9'd in ��Erlk 4 p . , 1 u item F2 -II & < t I 3.0 FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS Priscilla A. 'i hompson City Clerk 3.1 Site Trip Generation Trip generation for the project was estimated using the rates published in Attachment D-2: Downtown Miami DRI Facilities Trip Generation Analysis in the Notification of Proposed Change_ (NOPC) to the Downtown Miami DRI, submitted to the South Florida Regional Planning Council on September, 1994 (see Appendix E). The vehicular directional split (in/out) was estimated based on the percentages published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Trip Generation, Sixth Edition, for similar land uses. A trip generation summary for the project for a weekday PM peak hour is provided in Exhibit 5. Exhibit 5 - Project Trip Generation(') The One Miami Developments PM Peak Period Vehicle Trips(') Land Use Designation # Units Rate per Unit (') Total In Out Hotel 300 Rooms 0.202000 61 24 37 Conference Center(3) 100,000 SF 0.000114 11 2 9 High -Rise Condominiums 300 DU 0.1360563 41 25 16 High -Rise Apartments 1,200 DU 0.1360563 163 99 64 Office 1,200,000 SF 0.0005985 718 122 596 -- Retail 400,000 SF 0.000519 208 89 119 TOTAL VEHICLE TRIPS(`) 1,202 361 805 (1) Based on rates published in Attachment D-2: Downtown Miami DRI facilities Trip Generation Analysis in the Notification of Proposed Change (NOPC) to the Downtown Miami DRI, submitted to the South Florida Regional Planning Council on September, 1994. (2) The entrance/exit split was based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Id2 Generation. 6th Edition, 1998. (3) The PM peak hour directional split for the conference center was estimated at 20% inbound and 80% outbound. (4) The traffic generated by the existing at -grade parking is already included in the traffic stream. This traffic would be part of the driveway volume and should not be added to the existing volume. One Miami - Master Traffic Study Page 11 02-1249 The redevelopment of this land will eliminate some existing privately operated at grade parking. This existing parking serves the other land uses in the area. This other site parking service will be maintained on the project by placing 1,675 additional spaces within the structured parking facilities. These spaces, where volume is already in the existing traffic stream, will be available to these present users. 3.2 Modal SplitlTransit Services Assumptions on transit trips, pedestrians, and internal trips are accounted for in the trip generation rates published in Attachment D-2 of the Downtown Miami DRI-NOPC (see Appendix F). However, it is likely that these percentages may increase with the proposed changes in Downtown Miami, such as improved pedestrian linkages and shuttle bus services. Furthermore, a new Metromover station may be constructed along SE 3rd Street, adjacent to the project site. This proposed new station is the responsibility of the Miami -Dade Transit Authority (MDTA) which will make the final decision on this matter. If this proposed Metromover Station is approved, transit ridership to the project area would increase. It is anticipated that transit ridership to the project area would be increased by 10 to 30,percent over the current rates. (Note this is a ridership increase - not a motor vehicle reduction). This increase in transit ridership will be agreed upon with MDTA if the proposed station is approved. .However, as shown in Exhibit 5, trip generation rates published in Attachment D-2 were used without any adjustments for future conditions. 3.3 Committed Projects The Miami Downtown Development Authority (DDA) has identified committed developments in the downtown area. These projects were listed in several issues of the DDA newsletter: City News - Miami. These projects are summarized and divided into either north of the Miami River or south of the river, as shown in Exhibit 6. One Miami - Master Traffic Study Page 12 Or2-1249 O N Ni I l� M it�:�����^�pz���a_ ,. The redevelopment of this land will eliminate some existing privately operated at grade parking. This existing parking serves the other land uses in the area. This other site parking service will be maintained on the project by placing 1,675 additional spaces within the structured parking facilities. These spaces, where volume is already in the existing traffic stream, will be available to these present users. 3.2 Modal SplitlTransit Services Assumptions on transit trips, pedestrians, and internal trips are accounted for in the trip generation rates published in Attachment D-2 of the Downtown Miami DRI-NOPC (see Appendix F). However, it is likely that these percentages may increase with the proposed changes in Downtown Miami, such as improved pedestrian linkages and shuttle bus services. Furthermore, a new Metromover station may be constructed along SE 3rd Street, adjacent to the project site. This proposed new station is the responsibility of the Miami -Dade Transit Authority (MDTA) which will make the final decision on this matter. If this proposed Metromover Station is approved, transit ridership to the project area would increase. It is anticipated that transit ridership to the project area would be increased by 10 to 30,percent over the current rates. (Note this is a ridership increase - not a motor vehicle reduction). This increase in transit ridership will be agreed upon with MDTA if the proposed station is approved. .However, as shown in Exhibit 5, trip generation rates published in Attachment D-2 were used without any adjustments for future conditions. 3.3 Committed Projects The Miami Downtown Development Authority (DDA) has identified committed developments in the downtown area. These projects were listed in several issues of the DDA newsletter: City News - Miami. These projects are summarized and divided into either north of the Miami River or south of the river, as shown in Exhibit 6. One Miami - Master Traffic Study Page 12 Or2-1249 f�'¢ s SjjJ $ g C 1) Residential ONE MIAM1,. NE 17 St. and Bayshore Dr. 746 Apartments Poinciana Village N/A N/A Sawyer's Walk NW 2 Ave and NW 7 St. CF G" Metropol Building Ld �'a Exhibit 6: Summary of Committed and Proposed Developments in Downtown Miami Pr itr.1 Localion Size " North of Miami River 1) Residential Miramar Centre NE 17 St. and Bayshore Dr. 746 Apartments Poinciana Village N/A N/A Sawyer's Walk NW 2 Ave and NW 7 St. 602 Condominiums Metropol Building NE 2 Ave and NE 2nd St 30 Rental Rehab Olympia Building SE 1 Ave and SE 2 St. 10 Rental Rehab 2) World Trade Centre N/A Offices, show rooms, hotel, retail, restaurant, convention, and exhibit halls. 3) Offices N/A N/A 4) Retail N/A N/A 5) Hotel N/A N/A 6) Recreational American Airlines Arena Biscayne Blvd./Port Boulevard 15,000 SF retail, 500 -seat restaurant, 37,500 SF office, and 19,600 -seat arena. Performing Arts Center NE 2 Ave and Biscayne Concert Hall & Opera South of Miami River 1) Residential Brickell on the River SE 2nd Ave and SE 5th St. 325 hotel rooms, 508 residential units, 106 apartments, and 17,426 SF of office Brickell Point N/A 599 residential units and 14,062 SF of retail/restaurant Courvoisier Courts SE 7th Street/Brickell KeyDr Apartments T 1 1 N/A EIA One Miami - Master Trak Study Page 13 02-1,249 ONE MIAML Project Location ize The Yacht Club Brickell / Bayshore Drive 356 Apartments, 7,807 SF of retail 14th Brickell West N/A N/A Fortune House N/A 297 residential units and 3,335 SF retail/commercial Brickell Bay Plaza Brickell 641 residential --units and 1,149 SF retail/restaurant 2) Offices N/A N/A 3) Retail N/A N/A 4) Hotel N/A N/A N/A - Not available at this time. 3.4 Trip Assignment and Distribution Project trips were distributed and assigned to the roadways providing the main access to the study area using the average Cardinal Trip Distribution for traffic analysis zones JAZ) 664 and 665, where the proposed project is located. Exhibit 7 shows the summary of trip distribution for both TAZs (detailed cardinal trip distribution is shown in Appendix G). The Cardinal Trip Distribution, as published by the Miami Urban Area Transportation Study (MUATS), gives a generalized directional distribution of trips from a TAZ to other parts of Miami -Dade County. For estimating trip distribution for the project, consideration was given to conditions such as the roadway network accessed by the project, roadways available to travel in the desired direction, and attractiveness of traveling on a specific roadway. The resulting project trip assignment on the impacted roadway segments is shown in Exhibits 8. One Miami - Master Traffic Study Page 14 02.=x. 49 ONS M IAML Exhibit 7 - Cardinal Distribution for TAZ 664 & 665 Cardinal Direction Distribution NNE 11.86% ENE 6.14% ESE 0.96% SSE 1.50% SSW 12.24% WSW 26.86% WNW 20.40% NNW 21.08% Total 100.00% Exhibit 8: Project Trip Assignment Roadway Segment Percent of Project Traffic Entrance Exit Biscayne Boulevard north of SE 2nd St. 18% (SB) 28% (NB) Brickell Avenue south of SE 4th St. 28% (NB) 28% (SB) SE 2nd Avenue north of SE 2nd St. 21 % (SB) N/A* SE 2nd Street west of SE 2nd Ave NIA* 11% (WB) SE 3rd Street west of SE 2nd Ave 33% (EB) 33% (WB) Total 100% 100% (-) N/A: Not applicable because roadway is a one-way street One Miami - Master Traffic Study Page 15 02--1?49 nd; lic ONIMIAMIn recc i,; "It"" E item PZ—I OF i 11P.- o.^.2! Priscilla A. e 3.5 Future Roadway Traffic Volumes City Clerk The proposed development and proposed project traffic volumes would be added to the existing traffic volumes to obtain the total future link volumes. 3.6 Planned Roadway and Transit Improvements The Miami DDA has identified recommended priority transportation improvements for the next 10 years. These recommended improvements include: • project plans by local government and private developers, • new project proposals to meet specific transportation needs, and • project proposals that encourage revitalization, urban infill development and provide important pedestrian linkages. Exhibit 9 shows the recommended phase priority transportation improvements projects. Fxhihit 9- DDA Recommended Prioritv Transportation Imorovements M First Phase Priorities Second Phase Third Phase Priorities Priorities (next 1 - 3 Years) (next 7 -10 Years) (next 4 - 6 Years) Roadway Biscayne Boulevard: widening and 1-395 Expressway: 1-95 Downtown Distributor modification reconstruction Ramps: reconstruction 1-395 Expressway: design & 2nd Avenue Bridge: Seaport Tunnel: truck engineering for the eastern and reconstruction re tunnel between Watson western portions Island & Miami Seaport Seaport Tunnel: design & 1-95 Downtown Distributor I-95/SW 8th Street Ramps engineering Ramps: design & eng. & Interchange: PD&E Flagler Main Street: two-way 1-95/SW 8 Street Ramps & conversion & street enhancement Interchange: PD&E Brickell Village: roadway NW/SW 1 st Street: improvements & street widening & Extension enhancements One Miami - Master Traffic Study Page 16 02-1249 ONEMIAML First Phase Priorities Second Phase Priorities Third Phase Priorities (next 1- 3 Years) (next 4 - 6 Years) (next 7 -10 Years) NE 8th Street: extension S. Miami Avenue: two-way conversion N. Bayshore Drive: extension NE/NW 14th Street: street improvements Directional & Sector Signage Parking New Sport Arena Garage: 1,000 DuPont Plaza Area: spaces intercept garage Performing Arts Centre: 800- _ space garage Municipal Garage No. 1: reconstructing a 1000 -space garage MDCC Garage Transit Shuttle Bus: events Flagler Shuttle: electric bus expansion (Arena, PAC, East-West Transit: Constr. Seaport) Downtown Bus Terminal: East-West Transit: design & Tele-commuting/On-Board P Satellite Tracking:ng: Pilot expansion & enhancement engineering Project East-West Transit Studies: airport, downtown, seaport, and transit planning Brickell Shuttle: electric buses CarpooiNanpool: computer matching program Pedestrian Baywalk Extension from Bayside Riverwalk: extension from to Bicentennial Park Hyatt to Lummus Park NE/NW 9th Street: pedestrian promenade Source: DDA Newsletter. City News Miami, Vol. 2, issue 1. One Miami - Master Traffic Study Page 17 92-1249 ON L M I AM L 3.7 Urban Street System Si lbr"'s..i�ted P2��1 The street system serving the project site, commonly known as DuPont Plaza, is comprised of SE 2nd Street, SE 3rd Street, and SE 4th Street, SE 2nd Avenue, SE 3rd Avenue, and Biscayne Boulevard. The streets, as previously noted, are the responsibilities of both the Florida Department of Transportation and the City of -Miami. The street system as it presently operates is a combination of one-way streets and is intended to be an extension of the expressway and major arterial system in Downtown. It provides an effective movement of traffic from the 1-95 Ramps to Downtown Miami. While the one-way system makes excellent traffic use of the available rights-of-way and efficiently moves those volumes to both Biscayne Boulevard and Brickell Avenue, there has been recent recognition that the system favors the morning arrival trips since the fixed non-reversible lanes are not nearly as convenient for departing. trips. A build out traffic analysis for this project will be submitted to the City at the time that building plans are submitted to the City in connection with the anticipated MUSP modifications. At such time, a detailed traffic analysis will be submitted with a recommendation regarding possible upgrades to the existing street system. One Miami - Master Traffic Study page IS 02_1249 O N E M f A M l. Submitted anti r,, blit herrn Pt-tt 4.0 CONCLUSION C>i"axe An assessment of the traffic conditions and parameters associated with the proposed One Miami project was established in this "Master Traffic Study" in consultation with the City of Miami. This Master Traffic Study will be the basis for the traffic studies required in the future amendments to the subject Major Use Special Permit (MUSP) process. The study describes traffic conditions on roadway segments (links) at the boundary limits of the project area that control the inbound and outbound traffic because of the potential change in street directions which would result in a complete shift in traffic distribution within the project area roadways. The study also established the existing and future pedestrian and transit conditions in Downtown Miami, as well as the committed developments and the recommended transportation improvements Downtown Miami area. TRAF 3.RPT One Miami - Master Traffic Study Page 19 o2-1249 ONIMIAML Appendices Submitted Into the public 7vvith record", item Priscii'la A. City Clerk 02-1249 ONE M I AM L record n Priscilla A. City Clerk Appendix A 1998 Raw Traffic Volume Count 02-1249 ON M IAML iters Priscilla A. Thcmpscn 02-1249 Site tare City Clerk ar-A start tete: IVISl91 am >rft settle :flOM 110 weal v a ni file I.S. tU5 /1fwT106 Lt= fti ik fw tilt 11115 1111 e It= — 1 11 ftu*11111111 .._.x--- 38 MIS ,..._ t� L1. 3:06 06145 110 t� m2 5 u u us S1 314 us MIS u 1 11 45 of45111 14 2! 3p 2Ss 231 1 1 tt 4t tii 3241452 12:45 11:06 45 n3 3 3 1 : p m 11:3 a to 1 t 6 : 3 m 1531 IS n 211 241 111 912 1 5: n45 31 In 1121 11:45 11:06 n ZM 2 3 : r 245 GAS 2s 37 2 1 v w 12:31 v 13 w 306 213 3066 ; 1 T T )s : 16 p M 1211 12:45 p06 a m 1 11. a no 321 11:3 u 217 ; 1 1 11 s : ; s: 2N 13:71 a 3 TI 361 td fsi : 1 1 tt K is n 0 M44:06 91:45 f 211 2 13 1 6ifs 33 44:3 n 216 1 1 17 : is to 44:11 v 44:15 0 I2 w : 276 1117: 2 s tl a v 311106 IsM v us 3 >r s : tt 314p:71 MIS 21 ns � 1 2 12 n 30 2t 15:45 tt b 236 145 1267 ; 1 6 6 A N � �� 06:N 3< 2" : 4 is 11 a 311 45 0 211 2166 : 1 3 11 to no Woo, TS 06:45 06:45 as 261 206 1414 1 11 1 a no ns 1442 11:06 3S IN s 2 : in in MIS 112 m no 4 : ; 117 261 n:31 1n 0:45 ttt 651 31 III: T v S 3; 111 1 iK w:44 21S lu : I 3 : m 151 3s 06:15 211 111 : 33 12 3 : w 336 06:71 tri 11:45 w so is m : 3 a 1 11 : 237 f13 114 671 06:06 12S in 1 1 : In w 1n 1N 11:3 211 It:)t 217 1K 342 3 4 : 216 in 10:45 211 116 3s Sp : 1 p 3 1 : 251 in 32 in 11:06 iW 141 : 3 11 lm Imo MIS w 11:71 of lar : 34 3 S 1" in 11:45 to as lel 5v ; 5 n 1 3 : m 066 t44 In 32 11:06 ttf in s 1 4 3 : : 06 m 44 MIS 1% 11:71 211 a : M u 7 n 1 t 1 261 ttt 45 SL 11-U n6 m souls 5206 fouls 61 no 11144 23 3q 1112 - 11sn 061 y ISM s1 s6 n bf 15 a 1.f6 Masp Ut t+el four 06.15 IsM 06:3 11:45 06:3 13:06 tm %I= !S/ 1261 1 n "ti P.M.2.17 .11 02-1249 U teat tbo U feat Mir Was 11:11. no Kai nlw ru 1111. tbe'larlest latent! bolas I1:10, W esstabod Ill ecblcles. TM Mai Ma teeter ns .13 fl teat TM it peal Mar klu MO. TM "a also Was 1211. TM larlost lsternl bolas IS.M. asp cutaiaN IIS ecbicla. TM peak My factor Was .13 92,1249 O N M I A M 1.. Submitted Into the public record i� co c) � ith item. PZ I� c Priscilia A. Thompson City Clerk cruton :arid coltn :UK site code: 110101011117 LM1101 :USUM ILTO 10111 Of 9 Zit start leu: fallslto IlUCT1N :all UM IIM file I.I.: 112S1t jltat we :IfSGTR /Ln Ness It, ettAM Of SL I shut SOI III lace 1 !qu t-----.Owter bar --»--s Mr tilt 1st 2s/ Irl Its total tack + tnals IS Tebicla 12:10 falls N 31 /l 31 111 amst 11:11 21 N 21 is 1/ tits 12:11 12 22 Il 1 ss to 13:11 1 i " it 1 32 + /At i 1 12 11 n + I5:11 11 11 It 11 sl s+ /&:N 31 11 St i1 111 attests Mff 11 IN 125 Ill ill aaraeraatanea 01:04 us 211 323 Ill 1112 rrrnaeuraeteraaseaseaseeeanaaaa 11:11 251 212 Ill 221 112 uaaantmaaenttearaanemu 11:11 212 212 Ill 121 8S aaanaaaauanaataaa 12:11 Ill 271 US 211 sif seetrietseseetstitieesiertssiiietsrtt 12:11 Ill 261 271 I61 1132 atetaamtattaeunttnnaaanna 11:01 Iii ISI 211 211 lm setteet title e,ttttitetitotatstittettetta 12:01 Ip 212 213 225 loll tuuaaa,utaeaaaaiaiesatata 03:01 IN 117 Ill Ili 1W naaeana,aaaeaaa»attantaet 14:01 Ill IN Ill 101 1011 niaataeeatiaueanaaa,iattaua ISA 111 311 34S 311 IM tottaatttesatttnttartaetttatteasiitsatfill 11:01 271 21/ 231 251 1111 eateanaatiiaaaun»aiateataat 11:11 III 1st U& 101 lar ateaateitunatar:area 01:01 111 130 121 131 so itatitttalist Msttt 11:01 111 Us IN its ISI stertrtteeaett,et 11:11 lis 114 121 11 W staff Beliefs Met 11:11 11 n &1 1 211 tttatesa tout ISIS& U teat tbo U feat Mir Was 11:11. no Kai nlw ru 1111. tbe'larlest latent! bolas I1:10, W esstabod Ill ecblcles. TM Mai Ma teeter ns .13 fl teat TM it peal Mar klu MO. TM "a also Was 1211. TM larlost lsternl bolas IS.M. asp cutaiaN IIS ecbicla. TM peak My factor Was .13 92,1249 02-1249 Subm;,-"ted �nto ti.le �^-ubS 0 M re r��l M 001 'I, k .P D d u °�s N[ I A M l ,. item Pi-Ii on i.� � � -o - PriS%igie ,A.TII-e,a. ,,-,,,,I',,, City Clerk cMIM :nw :lul au ah: *Nuww t00llr :p1tI2LL M IIRI K Sit A Rett MA: U" 1wWW :UdR Lb= 1 Pin Y Q LIM L2xM his I.3.: us 1U 1 ftnot r 3.w t— :IIICU IR in ttMt*wM —x-- M I M ---x l.l. lul I.I. P.R. —� NUalq no' 12:0 UM I.I. 13 P.R. 315 : LI. a 311 ; In 112 12:11 a IIS : a 30 ; u ai 11:31 M w : a 21 : 111 sa We n 111 IN lla ; n 112 at inl ; u 311 wn xa RIM n 2M x aS ; a in 120 n M n 30 - : M m aJl u in ; a 3U-- a M1 11:0 n IM n1 ua : x in lx ull : a n/ sH nu a:0 n ns : u n1 ; 31 In a:ll u a ; M nl ; x $a am u 3M ; x ns x M a:a 6 $e a/ ua ; u N 3w3 1131: x W 176 nn CIA 6 311 ; 1 1M : is M � GO I 3S3 v 3n u 3N GM 3 >Q : u 3N : n so - 13:6 s n 3M n3 : it a m um ; is a a no 0:11 1 30 : 1 M : u sn Il:n 1 3a : n M a su 1i:31 31 331 : u n3 ; n w N:a u a 311 "3: U a in un: n u wii nn ISA 1 n1 : a 3a : u sk 15:13 u 3c : x in a 111 aal n 34 : n 3n 9 M a:a x a m 12U: x in M 1w ; u In M ml 16:0 n M N 30 ; M a3 p:S a 111 : of as : 111 w 0:31 u nw : 1M M. ; in M Ma w m . is fa : ni su m un: 3n m in nu a:p la is : in 1N : 30 30 I1:u I1/ 315 : ns 3w1 : 39 la 12:31 ui M : w nl : 10 M 0:15 m Ip 10 iM : la Q1 3N 60: fa 1Sa 316 Un p:0 la IM : M in ; M 3A Wu no in : 3D us : 6M M p:31 IN 111 : la w : a 3X p:a m us In m : of to in 113 ; w11 lm m no 0:p m in : nl in w 33 11:13 >N ui ; 3M in ; 111 n3 Sm 3wi w : a In sa 3!a Md in no in m : 315 nM In in: as nil a w u /l if us : M in : 1n nl us 3a us ; in Iu ; 116 3n Um 3a In ; M 111 ; a1 3a Ira 34 M3 a a : 20 IIA 113 tM ; In nu a w IUM ni In ; 30 M ; 131 a ua3 30 a : M » is la 11:11 111 111 w >• m ; m is a ; M ISI in n:e IOL lni 11u in 1112 us M no 113 I= nn isi nIM a in bull sru21 a.n 11111 p.3t li./S no n.0 nal Pod Ms p:0 I/:d Wu a:* WIs a:M %kM 106 M M Iw 110 nil i.3.1. .91 .M .11 .0 .l1 .11 02-1249 it hat tb u Peat bar bow WIS. M r+t "lug was SN. tkt larpett lattrtal klu HAS, all eutaim I" 1611clea. tb peal bar Geta Was .Il PL Peak n4 tl pest ba bew 11:01. tb peat etletse to so. IM lulat lateral! btu 11:15, all evattlnl In etkiclet. Zb Mat bat luta tat .11 02-1249 Submitted Into the public 0 N[M I Q M 1 record in coy 4 .a rte item _PZ-if onR-o�- Priscilla A. _ ,. o- .!,p on City Clerk cI'U'NS :IIM COW All talc! Site We: /1"011"12 l unn :a 1 halal tut or u 2 in suit late: 11/15111 Iltolor :12-141 Strait but :SL 2 Stfttl hue stralt:lttt N St 2 In III, I.1.: 1521 loll (-----utter ka ------) bar WNW het 1 tin 1st 211 Ito /U total tack +halls 2S laliflas 12:01 01/15 U U 1 f 37 t 1S:N I 1 S 1 If 1 12:01 1 1 i 1 12 11:14 N:N 1 1 7 1 1 11:1 1 f U U 11 t If:N 11 11 27 11 U en 11:01 32 11 61 92 IN 1+22t+11u N:N Ili 111 112 151 sfl i+ltnnt M111ttent 11:01 i14 171 111 101 NI e10+1e1124wu,m 11:0 in 111 111 N U1 nuttnnutam 11:01 1N A K lI] 011 11u+ttn11u1n 12:1 1N Ih 1h 3N in 111+mnu,t+n, - I1:N 111 in 111 IN ski 1+01u11nt+nunt - $I:M 114 III 111 111 Ht nn,ttt+etn+ett, II:N 115 lU PS it] 116 +tu+attuuan I1:N N h 111 lq 151 eau+e,ealnttn 91:4 in all 101 311 111 uuuuuutuuu WN in 1 h is 743 +tntutn++n 11:01 01 112 2s A 113 utu+tela+ 11:1 11 2t N in tun It:N 2S 26 if 27 01 rut 11:01 11 II It U N ere! 11:11 3S U 1S 21 17 t+, total Stll it hat tb u Peat bar bow WIS. M r+t "lug was SN. tkt larpett lattrtal klu HAS, all eutaim I" 1611clea. tb peal bar Geta Was .Il PL Peak n4 tl pest ba bew 11:01. tb peat etletse to so. IM lulat lateral! btu 11:15, all evattlnl In etkiclet. Zb Mat bat luta tat .11 02-1249 0 N E M I A M L Submitted Into the public record in connection item Pz - on t 1-I q -oY Priscilla A. Th3,e ,, pson City Clerk cI7I17011 :Ulla a= :UK 1310 Site " : 610OW622 Uwe :145 UM Un al a 4 111 6tart kU: U11S191 IIMIM Mau UZUS N 2 ITI 11sd1 llal/ - nu I.S.: W1 PM : 1 tin d we 14/11 (— j-" C� etrrtAw 120 St —K-- 9.4. 1.1. 1.1. 166142 lir 12:06 UIIS I.1. 1 9.1. ltl 1.1. 1 X7 1 4a 12:15 u 31S : a I49 ; S 451 22:x 1< is r Iu V U4 U:U n 66 167 04 ; n IU 221 1111 ; 13 174 419 IM 11:06 14 in ; n ns ; 47 4U4 12:1S 11 166 : U 254 : a 411 11:11 n lri ; 31 211 ; x 446 n:a 17 U ISI 662: 8 n Al 16" ; X IN UI 1711 1:00 IS M U 272 34 us 4:13 1 193 IS 711 : n U13 a:n S Ir 14 Id n 211 13:0 S 31 111 744: 17 i5 2s] 1121 ; n in W 1711 U:00 2 2u ; n w ; 24 sa - a:n 3 i» U 314 14 411 17:71 S 121 16 is ; n 413 Ma 1 U IN 171 ; 11 a !I6 m : IS 79 466 1W 14:11 1 211 : 24 211 x 411 14:15 7 212 ; is 222 33 414 14:8 U W ; U 18 ; n 466 Wu 3 37 21S 1111 ; n 79 ni U3: n IN 131 1196 I1:00 1 443 ; 27 206 ; IS 6" 15:15 1 300 ; 37 067 41 S1 WX a 3411 a ISI 57 in IS:d u a ]S9 ISn : 76 it? 124 U9 ; 91 215 so 2111 16:06 u 711 ; a ns : IS ill 11:15 17 ri7 123 206 141 S1i WX n ISS ; Ia 173 ; 131 $31 K:1S n N 3" 1114: 331 ?U 2U 111 ; 363 471 Sn n3i 17:00 N 211 34 117 : ni m I7:2S U 1U IM 212 ; 424 376 11:31 74 222 ; 423 In : 81 316 17:41 n 211 In N7 ; W 1724 200 742: W USS 36S np 06:00 a 11 ; U1 144 : 7U )a 00:11 73 in ; 112 in ; Ia 237 06:71 IM 126 : 713 131 ; 117 2N Uas In In n m ; m 2115 to s61; In nn n/ IW "A a 221 : 741 In M t>s ":Is in 77 : S2 in 6" 316 MA in 16 471 IN 171 in Wa IS 217 u 3s7 ; as na in m ; sw 2545 n3 136 14:06 >• 41 211 122 : 313 IN 11:11 sn 25 3n 1S1 : W m 11:71 141 142 327 IN ; W 111 WU 100 W 73 331 ; IN = 111 447: 471 HU IS W 11:00 in O : W a : An III MIS Id S6 ; 271 M : in in 11:31 u:45 IQ 117 197 x a : 222 'Al N 119 U is ; 119: 433 1751 1w IWll lei 5214 1185 n00 171 Um in W14 so 1a17Sta11 MR 1 11.11 UUl 11.11 n.11 1961 19.91 nap tui La 11:00 13:40 11:13 MIS 00:13 IsA plats S97 un W7 t1a 3217 IM P.I.F. .p .94 .91 .00 .97 .17 d2-1249 Submitted Into the public -0 N L M 1 A M L record in come i on %Mth item Pa-lt onu_L•o�— Priscilla A. Thompson --. City Clerk CITTIM :VIII cm Ax Site COO : 91/10/104123 WWI* :a 2 An IMtI a it 2 sflit! 1W Nte: M111/11 DUMIa :fMMM 2 IfMI t Y R 2 fttitt RftIM1D file I.J.: 2I2S hie 1 !tri MM :O Me Iefu (--- ou to Mt ---) rett:Mttf tett H111 fit lel M Id hul tui a knit 23 vakidu 12:91 $1111' IS Il U 11 a n I1:M 1 2 i1 / Z! 12:04 2 1. ! 2 it e -- M:M I 1 3 3 f 11:91 1 1 2S S M n MA 11 21 n d 221 tent 11:0 M 11 97 321 nS nuusuuu M:M 121 lit 111 10 62! meeemumm�emne 91 M iN in 111 111 us neuenenmutetue 11:91 IN isi 131 11t 0 nnteeeeemeemm 11:91 221 221 023 in 111 uuuunmeuuue 12:91 in U? •191 10 S12 nneenmemmm�e - I1:M lu 191 Id Id ill meeeeemneetueeenm /2:91 112 111 in 28 Sia mmmnuennm U:M 1V Id 111 IM SSi een.tatu e+u.aur 14:91 tel 121 312 in SSS eeneemmemeeem ISA in in I% 191 113 matt"! tune":note" W" IN 1S2 111 111 SII eteeee"tt""Meeenn V:M 111 a N K 30 nnwuaM 91:11 M li a U 151 tenet "M 2S N. to n to nn 11:91 31 a 2s 31 191 tete 11:91 v It 11 a a n, tetsl 160 u tee! IM H pul Mu Ielu Malt. IM pd wine us IQ. 191 la tut lttartl Mp N:31, n1 aattuet 111 "lido. IM wt Ma luta "s .SS tt tett IM M pet Ma Mlu avis. IM tat »ir in /S1. 191 Iule t Ltawl Mtn M:M, d OKU11104 is "11414. IM "a MR hots! eat .M 02.41249 �� n! Cd PIl o UD ®® P a OU CML v LAND DEVELOPwFM ���IC TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION SLIbt"ii�tte!' t t e =� Since 19896 � I °.:recoV ��.r,�� iteM City Lied k ONE MIAMI MULTI USE PROPOSAL FOR DOWNTOWN MIAMI SITE UTILITY STUDY August 12, 2002 8550 W. FLAGLER STREET, SUITE 113, MIAMI, FLORIDA 33144 j A TEL: (345) 551-6267 • FAX: (3051551-4542 02—i249 E-mail: vsn@vsneng.com CIVIL Submitted Into the public LAND D InIc I I I I I I EvELOPmENT record int TRAFRC AND TRANSPORTAn I eM Since 1989 Priscii,�Z A. City Clerk TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1. General ........................................................................... 2 2. Storm Drainage System ...................................................... 3 3. Water Distribution System ................................................... 5 4. Sewer Collection System .................................................... . 7 5. Solid Waste Generation ..................................................... 9 EXHIBITS: LocationMap .......................................................... 10 "B" Storm Drainage Well Calculations .............................. 12 $tC.91 MD-WASD Availability Letter .................................... 20 MD-WASD Atlas (Sewer) ......................................... 23 MD — WASD Atlas (Water) ......................................... 24 Proposed Water Use Calculations .............................. 25 DERM Pump Station 30-0001 Monthly Report ............. 26 "DY) Solid Waste Generation Calculations ........................... 29 a2-12491 ®W�J U n CML s �� soon LAND DEVELOPMENT 6 TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION Since 1989 ONE MIAMI SITE UTILITY STUDY 1. General A. Project Location and size: Submitted Into tape public record in conne���:° n %,vith item -1 I all Priscilla A. � F� 1(R i son City Clerk The proposed project consists of a Diversified Multi -use Facilities to be constructed at an approximately 5.94 acre site located on three city blocks known as Tracts B, C and D, in downtown Miami designated as Block 2, Block 3 and Block 4 of Dupont Plaza Subdivision , Plat Book 50, Page 11, Miami -Dade County, FI. (See Exhibit "A"). The project limits are: to the west is SE 2"d Avenue, to the south SE 4th Street (Biscayne Blvd.), to the east Biscayne Blvd and SE 3rd Avenue and to the north SE 3`d Street and SE 2nd Street. All these being in Section 6, Township 54 South, Range 42 East, Miami -Dade County, Florida. The site in its present condition is being used as an open parking lot facility without any permanent structures. B. The proposed project build -out will be as follows: Block 2: (Tract C, Residential) Area 1.74 Acres Residential Units 450 (Apartments) Retail 19,790 SF Restaurant (22,000 sf) 572 Seats Construction on this block will consist of a 31 story residential tower over 11 story parking garage. The Retail space will be developed within the garage structure at the ground floor level. Block 3: (Tract B, Entertainment and Tract B, Residential) Area 2.46 Retail 18,450 Restaurant (27,000 sf) 702 Cinema (69,375 sf) 3,500 Residential Units 400 Retail 20,425 Restaurant (16,000 sf) 416 Acres SF (Tract B, Entertainment) Seats (Phase 1) Seats (Tract B, Entertainment) Condos (Tract B, Residential) SF (Tract B, Residential) Seats (Tract B, Residential) 2 02-1249 SR.�bmAtt�d � MAL re, LAND DEVELOPNEWT TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION _F € 6 my "1 P�v 3a it ��. Since 1989 pity t: ierit Construction on this block will consist of a 39 story residential tower with a 10 level parking garage, including a ground level retail pedestal. In addition there will be a 5 story retail/entertainment complex.. Block 4: (Tract D, Residential) Area 1.74 - Acres Residential Units 650 (Apartments) Retail 8,785 SF Construction on this block will consist of a 58 story residential tower over a 14 story parking garage. The Retail space will be incorporated in the 14 story garage structure on the ground level. 2. Storm Drainage System A. Existing Storm Drainage System: Roadway storm drainage systems presently exist along the streets surrounding the proposed project. These systems are owned and maintained by the City of Miami and the Florida Department of Transportation. The site, in its existing or proposed conditions, does not or will not contribute any significant amount of storm water run-off into the Public Roadway System. No significant improvements to the existing Roadway Drainage System are expected as a result of this project other than some possible inlet modifications associated with the street of sidewalk improvements. B. Proposed On -Site Storm Drainage System: The proposed storm drainage system to serve this project will be designed to fully contain on-site the storm water run-off and to meet the Miami - Dade County Department of Environmental Resources Management (DERM) Environmental Resources Permit (ERP) requirements and The Florida Department Of Transportation (FDOT). This will be accomplished by means of deep drainage wells. No off- site run-off will be generated from the site. The total contributing site area and 30% of the building wall area exposed to the rain will be included in the Disposal Well System design calculations. An impervious coefficient of 0.98 will be used for the purpose of this study. 3 02-1249 ri aim 'rid ffa 03 cj It C�E� f �It 0 onnnnnn Since 1989 CML LAND DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION Based on information provided by an experienced well drilling company for other projects in the vicinity, an approximate well discharge rate 750 gpm per foot of head can be .expected. Storm water from roofs, internal driveways, walkways and panting areas will be conveyed by means of a collection system to sediment tanks sized to meet the detention volume requirements prior to discharging into the Well System. Additional Water Quality pre-treatment and Pollution Retardant Baffles at the catch basins will be provided at areas subject to vehicle traffic. - C. Required number of Wells: The proposed wells will be designed to maintain the site .dry during the 5 year -1 day storm, to keep flooding below the perimeter grades during the 25 year -3 day storm and to keep flooding below the minimum flood elevation during the 100 year- 3 day -storm. Since this site is. adjacent to Biscayne Blvd (SR 5) the well system will also have to prevent any discharge into the State Road Right of Way during the Critical Storm event (100 year, 1, 2, 4, 8, 24, 72, 168 and 240 - hour storm events). Based on the attached calculations, a total of 13 storm drainage wells are required to provide full on-site retention for this project depending on the actual yields obtained during the well drilling operations. The following is a break down of the number of wells required at each Block: Block 2 .................. 3 Wells Block 3 .................. 7 Wells Block 4 .................. 3 Wells For Well Disposal System calculations refer to attached Exhibit "B". 02-124 ' � ,n„� _ : s� fi. iR.$� t Based on information provided by an experienced well drilling company for other projects in the vicinity, an approximate well discharge rate 750 gpm per foot of head can be .expected. Storm water from roofs, internal driveways, walkways and panting areas will be conveyed by means of a collection system to sediment tanks sized to meet the detention volume requirements prior to discharging into the Well System. Additional Water Quality pre-treatment and Pollution Retardant Baffles at the catch basins will be provided at areas subject to vehicle traffic. - C. Required number of Wells: The proposed wells will be designed to maintain the site .dry during the 5 year -1 day storm, to keep flooding below the perimeter grades during the 25 year -3 day storm and to keep flooding below the minimum flood elevation during the 100 year- 3 day -storm. Since this site is. adjacent to Biscayne Blvd (SR 5) the well system will also have to prevent any discharge into the State Road Right of Way during the Critical Storm event (100 year, 1, 2, 4, 8, 24, 72, 168 and 240 - hour storm events). Based on the attached calculations, a total of 13 storm drainage wells are required to provide full on-site retention for this project depending on the actual yields obtained during the well drilling operations. The following is a break down of the number of wells required at each Block: Block 2 .................. 3 Wells Block 3 .................. 7 Wells Block 4 .................. 3 Wells For Well Disposal System calculations refer to attached Exhibit "B". 02-124 LOON MonGOOMMONE 3. Water Distribution System A. Existing Water System Facilities: CIVIL LAND DEVELOPbENT TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION Submibt d Into t, P--, rubflc record M, item P2 -11 _C o? - Priscilla A. City Ca e9 ek Miami -Dade Water & Sewer Department (MD-WASD) owns and operates the following domestic water facilities in the vicinity of this project: • Existing 12 -inch, 8" and 30" waters mains on SE 2"d Street that run along the entire east side of Block 4. • An existing 12 -inch water main on SE 3`d Street that runs along the entire of north side of Blocks 2 and 3 and along the entire south side of Block 4. • An existing 12 -inch water main on SE 2nd Avenue that runs along entire the west side of Blocks 2 and 4. An existing 8" water main that runs along the west side of Block 4. • An .existing 8" water main that runs along the west side of Block 2 and along the entire south side of blocks 2 and 3. • An existing 12" water main that runs along the south side of Block 2 and converts into a 24" water main that runs the entire south side of Block 3. • An existing 8" water main that runs along the east side of Block 3. • An existing 24 "water main that runs along the east side of Block 3. These existing water mains can be used to provide fire protection domestic and landscape irrigation service for this project. 5 02-1249 �--' LAND DEVELOPMENT Sal?CE' � ��J'q 7RkMC AND TRMSPOMAMN B. Required Water System Improvements: S rec item Pz -it PdSCWa A. -F , , Chy f -. As stated in the MD-WASD availability letter dated July 17, 2002, (See Exhibit "C"), the existing Watermain System is adequate and additional offsite system improvements will not be necessary for the construction of this project. The existing water mains on the streets adjacent to this project are adequate for the connection of the proposed Domestic Water, Fire Protection and Landscape irrigation services for the project. Exact location of these services will be determined at the time of final design. C. Anticipated water use: The water use requirements for this project are calculated based on the build -out information previously described. An additional flow demand of 418,373 GPD is expected from this project. For determination of anticipated flows see Exhibit "C" 021249 Since 1989 4. Sewer Collection System C{VIL LANDDEVELOMENT Submitted Into tl+r' pub i TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION regar d iter o�- i dE, A A. Existing Sanitary Sewer System Facilities: Miami -Dade Water & Sewer Department (MD-WASD) owns and operates the following sanitary sewer facilities in the vicinity of this project: • An existing 36 -inch gravity sewer line along SE 2nd Street that runs along the entire north side of Block 2. This line collects all the sanitary flows from the general area and directs them to Miami -Dade Water and Sewer Department Pump Station # 30-0001. • An existing 8 -inch gravity sewer line along SE P Street that runs along the north side of Block 2 and 3 and along the south side of Block 4 westerly to connect to an existing 24" line on Biscayne Boulevard Way. • An existing 10 -inch gravity sewer line along SE 4t" Street that runs east along the south side of blocks 2 and 3 and connects to an existing 10 inch line on Biscayne Boulevard Way. • An existing 10 -inch gravity sewer line along SE 4t" Street that runs east -along the south side of blocks 2 and 3 and connects to an existing 21 inch line on Biscayne Boulevard Way. • An existing 21 -inch gravity sewer line along Biscayne Boulevard Way that runs north along the east side of block 3 and connects to an existing 24 inch line on Biscayne Boulevard Way that eventually discharges into the existing 36" line on SE 2nd Street. B. Required Sanitary Sewer System Improvements: MD-WASD Gravity Sewer System requirements: As required by MD-WASD availability letter dated July 17, 2002 (See Exhibit "C"), the existing Sanitary Sewer Collection System is adequate and additional offsite system improvements will not be necessary for the construction of this project. The proposed project could connect to any of these existing gravity mains to obtain sanitary sewer service. 7 02-1249 CMI. LAND 11V11 l� �i � u fit @ Ca tP o (fii �1 LAND DEV1151ito �• r '�� VG EI.OPA�NT I i � o TRAFlriC AND TP,ANSPOfi7kT1ON ■+---� Since 1989 y- �+ ! C_ Transmission Capacity Requirements The Wastewater generated by this project will be conveyed to MD-WASD Regional Pump Station No. 30-0001. This is a major station with a yearly NAPOT of 5.20 hours per day according to DERM_ (See Exhibit "Cn) The current ET data as of June 2-002 reflects 6.77 hours, and with an additional flow of 409,200 gallons per day generated by this project it will only increase by 0.07 hours to 6.84 hours. Pump Station No. 80-0001 has sufficient available capacity to support this project. Flows form this Pump Station are transmitted to the MD-WASD Treatment Plant at Virginia Key. Alote: Project flows have been subsequently increased to 498,373 gpd. No significant impact to the condition of the pump station is expected. 0 02-1249 ®UOQu W®® P 6 09�J CIVIL r� LAND DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION Since 1989 5. Solid Waste Generation Submitted into tiny;uR 'ic record in conn`rc.von 'vJ— h item Wil! —ot 11 Priscilla A City Clary A. Solid Waste Generated by this project will be collected in standardized on- site containers for refuse and re-cyclables. Either hauling companies and/or the City of Miami Solid Waste Department will provide regular pick- up services. The anticipated daily solid waste generation for this project is 102 CY per day. (See Appendix "D"). +02-1249 9 CML LAND DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC ANDTRAWPORTA710N Since 1989 ite'rnY- PrEsct! a EXHIBIT "A" Location Map a2 -x.249 10 N.E. sp 2 s - BAYFRON t 10 9 a , s a >� N Subs `x ' RAW, so 0 s reco._ ' ,I 11 13 i{ If 16 17 Y tern _ •lGi1i s • t �\J•+ 11E. i ST. EAST FL A G L E R—ST.-°--+— -Z O kAl702'•' a:. �, Q 'W j(87-26)P Q % 7 L3 / TR;3 •o= s n TRACT s6p„ s.E. t ��` sr. MIAMIO +`�ti , 351 �`O e , j �2"7 GHOPI��fr• • N _ T ,. ,It ,s ,a ,. ,o f s _ � A g) 1 4 1 sI >< 3 4 [ . TRACT "B" i TRACT 19C3, S.C. • APPROXIMATE!- SCALE PPROXIMATESCA►_E 1"=325' 7 I 1 o D J S• y° 815CAYNE 8 LCVJl1 C A .. g J� �W/� •+/ - H M r` BRICkcC PNr D-5 8_9g ft WAY Qo 49 ROJECT LOCATION �\` CLAUGHTON BICKELL - SEC 3 (119-T0) TRACT G PA.R -1 ` 1a ; (132-96) " Li 50. KEY ON so 1 1 EC.I ( to . 14, Is.I n . 1S ' 1J >. to a n 1. by s Z .►,l T EAST FL A G L E R—ST.-°--+— -Z O kAl702'•' a:. �, Q 'W j(87-26)P Q % 7 L3 / TR;3 •o= s n TRACT s6p„ s.E. t ��` sr. MIAMIO +`�ti , 351 �`O e , j �2"7 GHOPI��fr• • N _ T ,. ,It ,s ,a ,. ,o f s _ � A g) 1 4 1 sI >< 3 4 [ . TRACT "B" i TRACT 19C3, S.C. • APPROXIMATE!- SCALE PPROXIMATESCA►_E 1"=325' 7 I 1 o D J S• y° 815CAYNE 8 LCVJl1 C A .. g J� �W/� •+/ - H M r` BRICkcC PNr D-5 8_9g ft WAY Qo 49 ROJECT LOCATION �\` CLAUGHTON BICKELL - SEC 3 (119-T0) TRACT G PA.R -1 ` 1a ; (132-96) " "IFI- C. BRICK KEY ON CLAUGE 1 1 EC.I ( 14, CML LAND DEVELOPMENT MR* I I I I I I 1�.. TRAFFIC MaMANSPORTAMN Since 1989 to th,, record in item _?gr jj_on Priscilla A. Thor Epson City Clerk EXHIBIT "1319 Storm Drainage Calculations 02-124912 CIVIL LAND DEVEI-OPLOENT TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION Since 1989 Submitted Into the P,-;b!lq-, recot'di itenn Pe- t PrisdHa A. city clerk STORMWATER WELL CALCULATIONS ONE MIAMI BLOCK 2 DATE: 7/512002 SITE DATA: SITE AREA = 1.74 ACRES BUILDING FOOT PRINT = 300 FT BUILDING HIGHT = 350 FT BUILDING WALL AREA = 2.41 ' ACRES CONTRIBUTING BUILDING AREA = 0.72 ACRES CONTRIBUTING AREA = 2.46 ACRES LOWEST ADJACENT GRADE = 6.83 NGVD RUN OFF COEFFICIENT = 0.98 WELL DATA: WELL DISCHARGE RATE PER FT OF HEAD = 750 gpm NUMBER OF WELLS = 3 TOTAL WELL DISCHARGE RATE PER FT OF HEAD = 2250 gpmlft MEAN HIGH TIDE ELEVATION [MH] = 1.52 NGVD WELL DIAMETER = 24 IN SPECIFIC GRAVITY LOSS [SG] = 2 FT 13 02=1249 om m,, vvao 0 Since 9: CIVIL LAND DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION STORMWATER WELL CALCULATIONS ONE MIAMI BLOCK 2 DATE: 7/5/2002 y13I` as Y'nitt-d Into the pUbli^ !il ail �2-11 _pp It -lr-off. ��'ilSc.,alie.� d'h n aLL''� a b� Ail+:tee City G r DESIGN STORM RAINFALL INTENSITY [in/hr) PEAK RUNOFF [cfs] WELL HEAD [ft) SG + MH [ft) STAGE [NGVD) CRITICAL STAGE [NGVD) 5 yr- 24 hr 6.17 14.89 2.97 3.52 6.49 25 yr- 72 hr 6.98 16.85 3.36 3.52 6.88 7.00 100 yr- 72 hr 7.44 17.96 3.58 3.52 7.10 THE MINIMUM PERIMETER GRADE ELEVATION IS 7.00 NGVD. THE NUMBER OF WELLS PROVIDED IS SUFFICIENT TO MAINTAIN THE PEAK STAGE OF THE 25 YEAR-72HR STORM WITHIN THE PROPERTY. 14 X02-1249 ano uo ®®Q ii U� CML Submitted Into the �-ubli- LAND DEVELOPMENT record i,'., o-nnt ..P1 TRAFFICAND TRANSPORTATION item$� ` Since 1989 Priscilla A. T hA t �.. M City Clerk STORMWATER WELL CALCULATIONS ONE MIAMI BLOCK 3 DATE: 7/5/2002 SITE DATA: SITE AREA = . 2.46 ACRES BUILDING FOOT PRINT = 300 FT BUILDING HIGHT = 640 FT BUILDING WALL AREA = 4.41 ACRES CONTRIBUTING BUILDING AREA = 1.32 ACRES CONTRIBUTING AREA = 3.78 ACRES LOWEST ADJACENT GRADE = 6.83 NGVD RUN OFF COEFFICIENT = 0.98 WELL DATA: WELL DISCHARGE RATE PER FT OF HEAD = 750 gpm NUMBER OF WELLS = 7 TOTAL WELL DISCHARGE RATE PER FT OF HEAD = 5250 gpm/ft MEAN HIGH TIDE ELEVATION [MH1 = 1.52 NGVD WELL DIAMETER = 24 IN SPECIFIC GRAVITY LOSS [SG] = 2 FT 15 02-1 2.49 mommummoom ® Ua QJ 0 n ®® P b Vil CIVIL LAND DEVELOPW-MT b In I TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION S Ubm i"tted Into fl16) public, u b b e` Since 1989 recolr�a u �'� iters -1 P2-I10- �rrS�rli� City Gierli STORMWATER WELL CALCULATIONS ONE MIAMI BLOCK 3 DATE: 7/5/2002 DESIGN STORM RAINFALL INTENSITY [in/hr] PEAK RUNOFF Ids) WELL HEAD [ft] SG + MH IN STAGE [NGVD] CRITICAL STAGE [NGVD] 5 yr- 24 hr 6.17 22.87 1.96. 3.52 5.48 25 yr- 72 hr 6.98 25.87 2.21 3.52 5.73 6.00 100 yr- 72 hr 7.44 27.58 2.36 3.52 5.88 THE MINIMUM PERIMETER GRADE ELEVATION IS 6.00 NGVD. THE NUMBER OF WELLS PROVIDED IS SUFFICIENT TO MAINTAIN THE PEAK STAGE OF THE 25 YEAR-72HR STORM WITHIN THE PROPERTY. 16 a2-1249 D ymQDUO Di Q n mm =� Since 98 CML LAND DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION STORMWATER WELL CALCULATIONS ONE MIAMI BLOCK 4 DATE: 7/5/2002 SITE DATA: Submitted Into the public ite 5 Pa tt t1-�9�oa- SITE AREA = 1.74 ACRES BUILDING FOOT PRINT = 300 FT BUILDING HIGHT = 475 FT BUILDING WALL AREA = 3.27 ' ACRES CONTRIBUTING BUILDING AREA = 0.98 ACRES CONTRIBUTING AREA = 2.72 ACRES LOWEST ADJACENT GRADE = 6.83 NGVD RUN OFF COEFFICIENT = 0.98 WELL DATA: WELL DISCHARGE RATE PER FT OF HEAD = 75.0 gpm NUMBER OF WELLS = 3 TOTAL WELL DISCHARGE RATE PER FT OF HEAD = 2250 gpm/ft MEAN HIGH TIDE ELEVATION [MH] = 1.52 NGVD WELL DIAMETER = 24 IN SPECIFIC GRAVITY LOSS [SG] = 2 FT 17 02-1245 -CIVIL LAND DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATKNN 1� I STORMWATER WELL CALCULATIONS ONE MIAMI BLOCK 4 DATE: 7/5/2002 I Pz-II ----- DESIGN STORM RAINFALL INTENSITY [in/hr] PEAK RUNOFF [cfs] WELL HEAD IN SG + MH [ft] STAGE [NGVD] CRITICAL STAGE [NGVD] 5 yr- 24 hr 6.17 16.46 3.28 3.52 6.80 25 yr- 72"hr 6.98 18.62 3.71 3.52 7.23 9.69 100 yr- 72 hr 7.44 19.84 3.96 3.52 7.48 THE MINIMUM PERIMETER GRADE ELEVATION IS 9.69 NGVD. THE NUMBER OF WELLS PROVIDED IS SUFFICIENT TO MAINTAIN THE PEAK STAGE OF THE 25 YEAR-72HR STORM WITHIN THE PROPERTY. 02-1249 18 am c- 0011030GUME21 UMBEEMEME Nf CIVIL LAND DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION EXHIBIT IVY MD-WASD Availability Letter MD-WASD Atlas (Sewer) MD-WASD Atlas (Water) Proposed Water Use Calculations DERM Pump Station 30-0001 Monthly Information Submitted Into the public itern'. ky 02-1249 WE 5t IM - ( OWSE. R\1, September 4, 2002 MIAMI—RADE WATER AND SEWER DEFAP.T14NT l✓,L.Ci,i, fkd Gi: _ '::.; O: i:. ::`.:i!. i<..k i.e (:;c ;4 a Tr VSN Engineering, Inc. 8550 W. Flagler Street Suite 113 Miami, Florida 33144 S j),r jry° City Re, Water and Sewer Availability for "ONE MIAMI", Miami -Dade County, Florida. Ladies and Gentlemen: This letter is in response to your inquiry regarding water and sewer availability to the above -referenced project for the proposed construction of one thousand five hundred (1,500) residential apartment units, sixty-seven thousand four hundred fifty (67,450) square feet of retail store space, three thousand five hundred (3,500) seat cinema and one thousand six hundred ninety (1,690) seat restaurant The County owns and operates a thirty (30) inch water main located at S.E. 2 Street and S.E_ 2nd Avenue, from which the property owner shall install and connect a twenty-four (24) inch water main, southerly in S.E, 2nd Avenue to Biscayne Boulevard Way, thence, easterly in Biscayne Boulevard Way to be interconnected to the existing twenty-four (24) inch water main. Any additional water main extensions within the referenced property shall be twelve inches (12) minimum in diameter with two (2) points of connection. The County also owns and operates an eight (8) inch gravity sewer main abutting the entire boundary of the referenced property, from which the property owner shall connect said property. Any proposed sewer main extensions within said property should be eight (8) inches minimum Construction connection charges and connection charges shall be determined once the property owner enters into an agreement for water service with the Department. Information concerning the estimated cost of facilities must be obtained from a consulting engineer. All costs of engineering and construction will be the responsibility of the property owner_ In addition, the Department's standard water connection charge will be required. Easements must be provided covering any on-site facilities, which will be owned and operated by the Department. Please be advised that the right to connect the referenced property to the Department's sewer system is subject to the terms, covenants and conditions set forth in the Florida Department of Environmental Protection ("DEP") and the County dated July 27th, 1993, the First Amendment to Settlement rWi 02.1249 Submitted into thoo puNic, imps "t P2 -11 i - o�- €ty Agreement between DEP and the County dated December 215% 1995, the First Partial Consent Decree and the Second and Final Partial Consent Decree entered in the United State of American Environmental Protection Agency vs. Metropolitan) Dade County (Case Number 93-1109 CIV- MORENO), as currently in effect or as modified in the future, and all other current, subsequent or future agreements, court orders, judgments, consent orders, consent decrees and the like entered into between the County and the United States, State of Florida or future enforcement and regulatory actions and proceedings. This letter is for informational purposes only and conditions remain in effect for thirty -(30) days from the date of this letter. Nothing contained in this letter provides the property owner with any vested rights to receive water service. The availability of water service is subject to the approval of all applicable governmental agencies having jurisdiction over these matters. When development plans for the subject property are finalized, and upon the owner's request, we will be pleased to prepare an agreement for water service, provided the Department is able to offer those services at the time of the owner's request. The agreement will detail requirements for off-site and on-site facilities, if any, point of connections, connection charges, capacity reservation and all other terms and conditions necessary for service in accordance with the Department's rules and regulations, If we can be of further assistance in this matter, please contact us. Very truly yours, , 4 ?1 6Z'�" M. Barrios New Business Supervisor 1 Utilities Development Division 21 a2-1249 MD-WASD ATLAS (SEWErxi 339 364 5 /// S T �ti8 361 3 44 4c� 3 £? 4;14 f.,-Z4n 4?0 412 36 .Srir.27 #�57 2 IZ 10" 1J 2 Z WS*T. 2" E. 5 EL AGLER 59t? 22-1 15"a -Z5 t to 424 7 11429 431 (2!2a24 42 Z 43-1425 aro 2872 Q 29E32 S.E. S T. 23 L ca 318 24' t 422 6 "33 53 99 j0t�-- :✓4 5987 2800 SI8 963 29?3 m 446 22 gg cH PI -f PLAZA' N37 to 7� t " 27 2 ..•, ST. 4.43. . SLUDGE d•` i hIT�73 436 439 4 I '` ..P— 2 -12 3 ! i 437 43 44 �� %S.186 'i 2924 � t1 I X34 646 \ 2 J S T 447 46 a, 13 ¢... 449 448 _" if t {54 9 ' i Y. F. TRAILER cli 45016{ 2 S.E. i0 4531 r -> 436 d5 �'" Jr �---- boa�j .r� MO 23 -1.24D Submitted Into the public record in coslnectiwll � pith item �2.1TCe1 1i-�Q-oY Priscilla A. -hoMpson City Clerk MD_WASp ATLAS (WATER) ):2119 f j3 9219 1 V T ,� Y� , 44 rs 528 S.E. 9219 330 289 Zia 13 1 2sa 1461 X219 � f9 A2 99 7 5 T. 40 1 39 E. 2 3Y9 9216 9219 1546 3 2 9 ITS 12 , 40 r 7367 1048 1 ST d+ 736 92 t9 !4 3 a T3357 7357 9Lf4 ��� F.-5125/OL 100 //,,• EMI �� 964 � 2 � S6 E. 7367 ST IT 9219 2 1039 l'i t' 1� •-tom / � f> _.___ '-----.•., r.,-.._ ui ta°l� c�gRb� LE,� f11o1981� Y.F.5-10-02 3540 UW -2001.-00() 2 4 a2-1249 CML LAND 1EVELOP111 TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION Since 1989 PROPOSED WATER USE CALCULATIONS PROJECT: ONE MIAMI DATE: 9 -Aug -02 Submitted Into fil)e record in item 2 -y On1t._ .1 Pr-iscilla�. , l City Clod TYPE OF BUILDING USE AREA/UNITS [sf] [seats] RATE [9pd/sfl [gpd/seat] ADF [9pd] TRACT C (RESIDENTIAL) APARTMENT UNITS 450 200 90,000 RETAIL 19,790 0.05 990 RESTAURANT (22,000 sf) 572 50 28,600 SUB -TOTAL 119,590 TRACT B (ENTRETAINMENT) RETAIL 18,450 0.05 923 RESTAURANT (27,000 sf) 702 50 35,100 CINEMA (69,375 SF) 3,500 3 10,500 SUB -TOTAL 46,523 TRACT D (RESIDENTIAL & PARKING) APARTMENT UNITS 650 200 130,000 RETAIL 8,785 0.05 439 SUB -TOTAL 130,439 TRACT B (RESIDENTIAL) CONDOMINIUM UNITS 400 250 100,000 RETAIL 20,425 0.05 1,021 RESTAURANT (16,000 sf) 416 50 20,800 SUB -TOTAL 121,821 INET INCREASE: 418,373 25 02--1249 record icer �2 -1 t _ Priscilla A...f � � ci y Pump Station Monthly Information Station..30 -0001 Atlas Pg..F14 MIAMI DADE WATER & SEWER DEPARTMENT Addr..390 NW NORTH RIVER DR Sec -Township -Range........... 1-54-41 Genr._ ET clock.Y Telm.Y #Pumps. 8 Pump Type.A Stn Class.M Speed.2 Hrspwr.+ Res flow(gpd) Proj Napot % Cap Plans.. 8,678,336 6.77 hrs 67.70 Plats.. 0 5.20 hrs 52.00 Extens. 0 5.20 hrs 52.00 <Plan Review> Moratorium..OK ................................. Moratorium effective since Yearly NAPOT (hrs-) ............ 5.20 Stn Gross Capacity(gpd)..221,760,000 Station Reduction Factor....... 0.60 Stn Net Cap Certif(gpd).. 0 Stn Net Capacity(gpd) .... 133,056,000 Indicated Flows(gpd)..... 28,828,800 Date Mo.NAPOT Avg Daily Flows Rgd # Comments Flg Pmp 05/24/2002 3.55 24.83 0.00 Y 8 04/25/2002 3.18 22.25 '0.00 Y 8 03/27/2002 4.04 28.28 0.00 Y 8 02/26/2002 3.32 23.22 0.00 Y 8 01/28/2002 4.72 33.01 0.00 Y 8 12/26/2001 3.67 25.70 0.00 y 8 11/21/2001 6.34 44.39 0.00 Y 8 Signature..LEZCAF Sign Date..01/29/2002 16:27:35.57 GOLD/M Station I<m>provement GOLD/S <S>tation Inform. GOLD/U <U>pstream Station LD/D <D>ownstream Station GOLD/P <P>ump Information .LD/G Codes & Cata<g>ories GOLD/T Sewer Cer<t>ification 26 02-1249 *2002070109291310*LEZCAF ent . * M Stat Station Station R Type Owner Number Proposed Number of gallons (gpd): 409200 * This is not an official docum Current Delta Projected ET (Hrs) ET (Hrs) ET (Hrs) ****************************** Downstream Stations ***************************** OK A52M+ 30 0001 6.77 0.07 6.84 IN 30 CD 1002.43 = 0.07 1002.50 AC 30 RS 1002.28 0.03 1002.32 IN 30 RS95APR 1001.97 0.03 1002.00 IN 30 RS94MAR 1002.12 0.03 1002.16 27 oo,-1249 all, .11, U1,110—MOMINUMB .Mmmmm CIVIL LAND DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION EXHIBIT "D91 Solid Waste Generation Calculations G"Uy, 28 02'1249 NMI LAND DEVELCPAENT TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION all amSince 1989 PROPOSED SOLID WASTE CALCULATIONS PROJECT: ONE MIAMI DATE: 13 -Aug -02 Submitted Into recor(j 'r itemPf'isdilua A. �- TYPE OF BUILDING USE AREAIUNITS RATE SOLID WASTE SOLID WASTE [sq [Ib/sj GENERATED GENERATED [seats] [Ib/seat] [!b] (tons] TRACT C (RESIDENTIAL) APARTMENT UNITS 450 8 3,600 1.80 RETAIL 19,790 0.025 495 0.25 RESTAURANT (27,000 sf) 572 5 2,860 1.43 SUB -TOTAL 6,955 3.48 TRACT B (ENTRETAINMENT) 18,450 0.025 461 0.23 RETAIL RESTAURANT (25,000 s1) 702 5 3,510 1.76 CINEMA (69,375 SF) 3,500 2 7,000 3.50 SUB -TOTAL 10,971 5.49 TRACT D (RESIDENTIAL) APARTMENT UNITS 650 8 5,200 2.60 RETAIL 8,785 0.025 220 0.11 SUS-TOTA''_ 5,420 2.71 TRACT B (RESIDENTIAL) CONDOMINIUM UNITS 400 8 3,200 1.60 RETAIL 20,425 0.025 511 0.26 RESTAURANT (16,000 sf 416 5 2,080 1.04 SUB -TOTAL 5,791 2.90 [NET INCREASE: 29,136 14.57 ANTICIPATED SOLID WASTE VOLUME AT 7 CY PER TON: 102 CY I DAY 29 02 '1249 ONE MIAMI Submitted into the pubw record in cep n c' _: o n 1 item ft -11 o!,., .!k-!..q-oy fri�iio € City Ciel Economic Impact Analysis Submitted to: City of Miami Prepared For: MDM DEVELOPMENT GROUP Prepared by: SHARPTON, BRUNSON & COMPANY, P.A. One Southeast Third Avenue Suite 2100 Miami, Florida 33131 (305) 374-1574 02-1249 F�Y1 iter ONE MIAMI City TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE(S) THE PROJECT OVERVIEW 1-2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Summary of Benefits 3 OBJECTIVES AND DEFINITIONS Objectives 4 Definition of Economic and Tax Impact 4 Direct and Indirect Effects 4 Measures of Economic Impact 5 Description of Results g DISCUSSION OF THE RESULTS BY ECONOMIC INDICATORS Impact Indicators 7 Results of Indicators 7 Impact of Construction 7 Impact of Ongoing Operations g Impact on Local Tax Revenues g Analysis by Economic Indicators g Employment g Wages g Output g Local Taxes 10 Public Sector Cost 11 Impact Fees 11 EXHIBITS Exhibit I: Summary of Economic Impact 12 Exhibit II: Impact and Other Fees 13 02-1249 Project Overview The proposed project consists of a diversified multi -use development which will include residential (rental apartments), retail, parking and condominium uses. The project is designed to guide the area's growth into a living and working community within the downtown core district. The cornerstone of our project is the 4 -story retail/entertainment complex with lifestyle . retail offerings that focus on the home, leisure activities, and neighborhood services. The uses are intended to create an attractive new neighborhood offering a unique city living experience. The Project is located on the north side of the Miami River within the heart if Miami's Central Business District (CBD). The site consists of approximately 9.30 gross acres or 5.94 net acres on three city blocks known as tracts B, C, and D in downtown Miami's designated Block 2, 3, and 4 of Dupont Plaza Subdivision. A more detailed summary of each tract is as follows: Tract B- is rectangular in shape and surrounded by Southeast 3rd Street on the north, Biscayne Boulevard Way/ Southeast 4th Street on the South, Biscayne Boulevard on the east and Southeast 3rd Avenue on the west. Parcel B has gross lot area of 163,785 square feet (3.76 acres) and a net lot area of 107,343 square feet (2.46 acres). Tract C- is rectangular in shape and surrounded by Southeast. 3rd Street on the north, Biscayne Boulevard Way/ Southeast 4th Street in the south, Biscayne Boulevard on the 'ars i.i 8�..�.."?� � 9 � .s•'L.,. � .•.v: a. r` DRAFT iter P2 -q 1,f-IQ-o9- Prisciila A. City Clerk east and South east 3rd Avenue on the east and Southeast 2nd Avenue on the west. Parcel C has a net lot area of 75,780 square feet ( 1.74 acres) and- a gross lot area of 119,790 square feet (2.75 acres). Tract D- is rectangular in shape and surrounded by Southeast 2nd street on the north, Southeast 3rd Street on the south, Southeast 3rd Avenue on the east and Southeast 2nd Avenue on the west. Parcel D has a net lot area of 75,777 square feet (1.74 acres) and a gross lot area of 121,532 square feet (2.79 acres). Currently, the site is being used as a surface parking lot facility without any permanent structures. The zoning designation for all the tracts is CBD, Central Business District. The proposed development will consist of a total of more than 3.7 million square feet of commercial and residential space which will include 1,500 residential units, comprising more than 1,880,000 Sq. Ft. of livable space, 207,400 square feet of retail/ entertainment space, 9,600 square feet of office space and 1,467 space parking garage with ground floor retail. A detailed summary if the proposed development program is as follows: 02-1249 itei , Project Overview Tract B Total Gross Lot Area 3.76 acres or 163,785 Sq. Ft. Total Net Lot Area 2.46 acres or 107,343 Sq. Ft. Retail Area 81,875 Sq. Ft. Cinema - 68,000 Sq. Ft. Residential Units (Condos) 400 Parking Spaces (Residential Tower) 926 Total Developable Sq. Ft. 1,096,995 Sq. Ft. Tract C Total Gross Lot Area 2.75 acres or 119,790 Sq. Ft. Total Net Lot Area 1.74 acres or 75,780 Sq. Ft. Total Retail Area 32,190 Sq. Ft. Total Office Area 9,600 Sq. Ft Residential Units (Rental Apts.) 450 Parking Spaces . 922 Total Developable Sq. Ft. 948,000 Sq. Ft. Tract D Total Gross Lot Area 2.79 acres or 121,532 Sq. Ft. Total Net Lot Area 1.74 acres or 75,777 Sq. Ft. Total Retail Area 25,530 Sq. Ft. Residential Units (Rental Apts.) 650 Parking Spaces (Residential Tower) 969 Parking Garage Facility 1,467 spaces Total Developable Sq. Ft. 1,695,430 Sq. Ft. In addition, the project's enhancement will begin with proposed adjustments to the right of way of the streets and avenues surrounding the sites. The arteries will be widened to provide boulevard streets with shady tree canopies along the street edges and throughout the street medians. The project will also provide covered loggias for circulation under cover from weather conditions, specialty pavements, and pedestrian friendly plazas. F: 02-1249 Summary of Benefits Significant Community Benefits: Jobs ➢ Wages ➢ Taxes ➢ Economic Activity Residents' and Retai I/Resta u rant Employees' Spending Impacting Local Businesses: ➢ Food ➢ Recreation/Entertainment ➢ Transportation ➢ Retail The following table and charts summarize the economic impact of the Miami One development. GAY Clerk CONSTRUCTION PERIOD ANNUAL IMPACT RECURRING Economic Activity Stimulated Output $ 428,366,216 $ 62,878,708 Wages 259,940,342 15,326,866 Taxes 9.952,832 $ 688.306.558 $ 88.158.406 Jobs Created 915 470 3 92-1249 Objectives And Definitions Objectives The objective of this analysis is to provide information on the various benefits created by the Project and to prepare an estimate of such benefits to the City. Our analysis is based on an economic model, which estimates economic and tax impacts of various projects on a designated area. The model is specifically tailored to the City of Miami (the City). Definition of Economic and Tax Impact The construction and subsequent operation of the Project will create important benefits within the City. These benefits include new income, new jobs, new tax revenue and new economic activity impacting upon every sector of the local economy. Moreover, through the multiplier effect of respending and reinvesting, indirect economic benefits are added to the direct benefits brought about by initial construction expenditures, the expenditures from ongoing operations and new spending at the retail enterprises. Direct and Indirect Effects The total economic impact of public and private projects and policies on a region does not end with the impact from the initial construction expenditures; the continued benefits to the local economy must also be considered. Income to firms furnishing construction materials and services is subsequently converted into employee salaries, material purchases, investment in plant and equipment, savings, profits, purchases of services, and a variety of other economic activities. Income to laborers is subsequently respent for purchasing of food, housing, transportation, education, entertainment, medical and dental services, clothing, _personal services, and a wide variety of other goods and services. - Furthermore, income to the governmental unit is respent as salaries, purchases, and support of a variety of programs, including education, transportation, and social services. In turn, individuals, firms, and governments furnishing these goods and services again spend their income for more purchases, salaries, investments, and savings. In this manner, indirect benefits result each time the initial sum is respent, and the additional sum available in the local economy induces further job creation, business development and savings. Quantification of these indirect benefits has been the object of considerable economic study. Because economic relationships are so complex in our modern society, no single area or political unit is a completely self-contained economic unit. Therefore, purchases from other areas and political units are necessary, and goods services are exported in return. As purchases are made from other units, some of the benefits of economic respending are lost to the local economy. Ultimately, a smaller and smaller portion of the initial sum would' remain,. until, after several rounds of respending, an insignificant sum is left. 4 02-.1249 Objectives And Definitions The indirect effects can be viewed as a set of "ripples" in the economy. Indirect, like direct, resources require labor, materials, equipment and services for their production to induce further job creation and spending of wages. The "ripple" of the indirect effect multiplies the original impact of the purchase. The common measure of the magnitude of the "ripple" effect is called a multiplier. A multiplier measures the total magnitude of the impact on each particular economic indicator as a multiple of the initial, direct effect. For instance, a multiplier of 1" would signify no "ripple" effects as the total impact is 1 times the initial impact, while a multiplier of "2" would imply that the total impact is 2 times the direct effect. The actual magnitude of a multiplier depends on the likelihood the goods and services purchased in a region would be produced in, or provided from the region. The model we used to estimate the total economic impact incorporates a multiplier developed by utilizing past consumption and production patterns in the City. There will be significant economic benefit derived from the expenditures of the residents of the Project on eating, drinking, grocery, recreation, retail etc. This report does not include the economic impact of such expenditures. Measures of Economic Impact Various measures can be used to indicate the impact of a policy or project on a region. Specifically, for this study, they are the increases in local employment, wages, tax revenue and output that result. Definitions of these measures are as follows: Employment is measured full-time equivalent jobs. Wages include wages, salaries, and proprietor's income only. They may include non -wage compensation, such as pensions, insurance, and other fringe benefits. Wages are assumed to be expended by households in the area at which the wage-earner works. Local taxes include additional revenues from both ad valorem and non ad valorem assessments. Direct expenditures include those sums expended for land acquisition, site preparation and all hard and soft costs associated with a project. Indirect expenditures are those sums expended within the local economy as a result of the "ripple" effect described earlier. Out ut describes total economic activity, and is essentially equivalent to the sum of direct and indirect expenditures (exclusive of wages and taxes). 5 02-1249 Objectives And Definitions Description of Results For the purpose of describing the total economic benefits of the Project, the related expenditures and economic activity stimulated have been broken into two categories: Developmental Annual Recurring Developmental expenditures include those expenditures related to the design and construction phase of the Project and related amenities. Annual recurring activities stimulated are those expenditures incurred in connection with the ongoing operation of the Project, and the sales and expenditures of the retail enterprises leasing space at the Project. ciubrnitted Into the public record, in cors. C, r0', k,r?fih itern Priscilila A. Tn-O'V;Orn City Clerk 02-1249 iter: 92-1% , ryon t[pqo 3 ho" 1.�_�.1.9-os-- Pr Discussion Of The Results By Economic City Clark Indicators Impact Indicators We measured the Project's impact on four commonly_ used indicators of economic activity. Those indicators are: Jobs Wages Total output Local taxes Results of Indicators Exhibit I details the Project's direct and indirect impact on the above economic indicators for Miami: A summary of such impact follows: The economic indicator most commonly measured, and publicly reported on to gauge the economic impact of a public project is output. -The impact of a project on the indicator output is often referred to as the project's economic impact. Impact of Construction The site preparation and construction expenditures, including soft costs and impact fees are estimated at $504 million. Such activity will create approximately 915 new full time equivalent jobs and employ a maximum of 1,690 workers during peak periods. The workers will earn approximately $138 million in direct wages. DEVELOPMENT OUTPUT WAGES (One Time) Direct Indirect ANNUAL Operational: Direct Indirect Retail $227,951,371 200.414,845 $428.366,216 $ 11,740,860 10,322,564 40,815,284 $ 62,878,708 $138,325,001 121,615,341 $259,940,342 $ 1,140,660 1,002,868 13.183,338 $ 15,326:866 TAXES EMPLOYMENT $ 915 $ 915 $ 9,952,832 $ 9.952,832 57 413 470 rA 02"1149 i" C , fa AI Discussion Of The Results By Economic City brark, Indicators Impact of Ongoing Operations and Retail Enterprises As a result of the on-going operation and maintenance of the Project, Miami will gain approximately 57 new, permanent, full-time equivalent jobs. The wages of the workers who obtain these positions will provide an impact of approximately $2.1 million annually. The retail enterprises are estimated to create 413 permanent, full- time equivalent jobs. The wages of the retail workers will provide an impact of approximately $13.2 million annually. The total expenditures for the Project's operations, and the retail sales will provide a new, permanent impact of $78 million annually to the City's economy. This impact consists of the effects of new retail sales. and the direct expenditures from the maintenance, security and day-to-day operation of the Project, and the multiplied effects of such spending thus creating indirect benefits. Impact on Local Tax Revenues As a result of the construction and operation of the Project, various state, city and city governments and agencies would gain an estimated annual tax benefit of $10 million. Analysis by Economic Indicators Our analysis of the economic and tax benefits of the Project was done by each major phase of the Project. We identified the major phases to be developmental and operational. This analysis determines the economic benefits to the City by identifying such benefits for each of the phases. The effects on economic indicators used to measure benefits (employment, wages, output and taxes) were computed for each phase. Employment Employment is one of the most important economic benefits of the Project. It is one of the most accessible and direct benefits for the City's residents and it's residents and is a primary means by which developmental, operational and maintenance expenditures generate indirect economic benefits. A portion of this employment occurs on-site as a result of new spending at the retail enterprises, and a portion is derived from on-going operations of the Project. Further employment is generated off-site by the expenditures of employees of the Project and businesses located in the Project, at area businesses. As can be seen in Exhibit I, total short-term (developmental) employment will average 915 employees over a one hundred and eight period and a total on-going employment will average 470. The total on-going positions can be summarized as follows: Management Security Parking Maintenance/Facilities Retail 0 02--1249 Discussion Of The Results By Economic City Uevk Indicators Wages The analysis deemed wages are a direct by-product of employment. As discussed in the above section, both on-site and off- site jobs are created. There were both temporary and permanent in nature. To compute the wages associated with the new employment we started with budgeted data directly related to the developmental and operational phases of the Project, and we incorporated data from our research on retail sales. Employment, such as construction related employment, was obtained directly from construction estimates. These numbers were tested for reasonableness. Output The output generated, as a result of the development and operations of the Project, is caused by the following type of expenditures: Development costs expended in the City (100%) Annual operational expenditures of management company New spending in the locality by employees of businesses located in the Project To incorporate the impact of dollars being respent and/or reinvested in the City, a multiplier was applied to total direct output. A multiplier of 1.8792 was used to determine total direct and indirect output, created by the Project. This multiplier indicates that for every $100 spent in Miami, another $187.92 will be respent or reinvested in Miami. This multiplier was obtained from the Dade City Planning Department. Direct output from the developmental phase of the Project is primarily a result of developer costs. These costs include land acquisition, site preparation and soft and hard costs relating to the Project's construction. To determine the total output we determined what development costs were expected to be or had been spent in Miami. Total direct output during the development phase is $261 million. Total indirect output created by the direct respending in Miami is $230 million. Thus total Miami Output from the development of the Project is $491 million. The final component of output results from the direct operating expenditures of the Project, and the indirect benefits created as a result of the multiplier effect on direct output. The Developer provided us with an annual operating budget for the Project. An overall assumption was made that all expenditures would be spent initially in the City. 9 02-1249 Item Discussion Of The Results By Economic City Cr;�= Indicators Output (Contd.) The total operating expenditures incorporate all estimated expenses of the ongoing operation of the Project. The impact of the retail enterprises was measured separately as an economic indicator. To incorporate the potential respending and reinvesting in Miami, the multiplier effect was measured. By applying a multiplier of 1.8792 to the total direct output from operating expenditures and the retail enterprises, we determined total output (direct and indirect) from on-going operating expenditures and retail sales. Total direct output created from retail sales and operating expenditures is $33.4 million. Total indirect output created from retail sales and operating expenditures is $29.4 million. Total output created from ongoing operations and retail enterprises is approximately $62.8 million. Local Taxes A key and significant benefit generated from the development and operation of the Project is taxes. Several types of tax revenue will be generated from this project including ad valorem taxes. Specific ad valorem taxes include real and personal property taxes. Other taxes include occupational taxes and community development taxes. New real property taxes will be assessed on the Project. The assessment is based on a predetermined mileage rate being applied to the taxable value of the real property. We computed real property taxes for the developmental phase based on the cost of the development of the Project. This assessment base. is very conservative since tax on real property typically is assessed on appraised values and not actual cost. The basis for ongoing taxes is also overall cost. The mileage rate was obtained from the City Tax Collectors office relative to the Project's location. The projected annual real property. taxes are approximately $10 million. Total ad valorem taxes assessed by Miami -Dade County are allocated based on mileage rates to certain governmental entities. Listed below is the allocation of projected tax revenue. City Operating $ 3,250,694 City Miscellaneous 180,694 School Operating 3,081,925 County Operating 2,064,615 Debt Service - City 440,172 Debt Service -County 199,487 South Florida Water 215,749 Library Operating 162,986 School Debt Service 306,458 Florida Inland Navigation 13,913 Environmental Projects 36,139 TOTAL $ 9.952,832 10 02-.249 e n prisciai Discussion Of The Results BY Economic c`tyirt Indicators Local Taxes (Contd.) Although not quantified, the City, through its receipt of allocated state sales taxes will receive an additional benefit as a result of the development and operation of the Project, and from the retail enterprises. Public Sector Costs Impact fees Very significant factors in measuring the economic impact on a specific region of a project are impact and other required development fees. A summary of these fees are listed below: City of Miami Developmental Impact Fee City of Miami Developmental Admin Fee Downtown Devl. Supplemental Fee Miami -Dade County School Impact Fee Building Permit Fee Installation Energy Fee Other Fees For the purpose of this economic impact analysis, fees are included as a part of the direct development cost (output). Impact fees total approximately $3,604 million and other fees total approximately $3,581 million. These fees are shown in detail in Exhibit II. 11 02-1249 Exhibit List Exhibit I Summary of Economic Impact Exhibit 11 Impact and Other Fees Submitted Into the 02-4249 Su �� t re�`I �t eP2_.t �,la r Exhibit - I TAXES $ 9,952,832 9,952,832 $ 9,952,832 S 9,952,832 12 02-.1249 OUTPUT WAGES EMPLOYMENT DIRECT DEVELOPMENTAL $227,951,371 $ 138,325,001 915 OPERATIONAL . 11,740,860 1,140,660 57 RETAIL 21,719,500 7,015,399 413 TOTAL DIRECT 261,411,731 146,481,060 1,385 INDIRECT DEVELOPMENTAL 200,414,845 121,615,341 OPERATIONAL 10,322,564 1,002,868 RETAIL 19,095,784 6,167,939 TOTAL INDIRECT 229,833,193 128,786,148 TOTAL BENEFITS $ 491,244,924 $ 275,267208 1,385 TOTAL DEVELOPMENTAL $ 428,366216 $ 259,940,342 915 TOTAL OPERATIONAL 22,063,424 2,143,528 57 TOTAL RETAIL 40,815,284 13,183,338 413 TOTAL BENEFITS $ 491,244,924 S 275,267208 1,385 TAXES $ 9,952,832 9,952,832 $ 9,952,832 S 9,952,832 12 02-.1249 Submitted Into the pubiic recd,,,, d in v,,onr-eVecti ,19 � vvit k.. 4 Y +ti.v 6„a S v e a iteri'"s _E2 11 an t %V1 q �0i isc, Exhibit - II Pri'� , a . ON.E MIAMI EXHIBIT II ECONOMIC BENEFITS STUDY IMPACT AND OTHER FEES IMPACT AND OTHER FEES: A. Development Square Footages: Square Footage 1) Total gross building area 3,622,575 2) Maximum development area (FAR) 2,647,720 3) Residential F.A.R. 1,891,635 4) Retail F.A.R. 217,195 5) Lobby area 13,040 6) Gross parking area 1,354,540 B. Impact Fees: Amount 1) City of Miami Development Impact Fee (Ord = 10426) $ 1,582,384 2) Development Impact Administration Fee (Ord - 10426) 47,472 3) Downtown Development Supplemental Fee (Ord. - 10461) 684,668 4) Miami -Dade County School Impact Fee 1,289,888 Total of all Impact Fees $ 3,604,412 C. Non -Impact Fees: 1) Miami Dade W.A.S.A. "connection fees" $ 2,172,910 2) Building Permit Fee 800,452 3) Installation Energy Fee 400,226 4) Major Use Special Permit Application Fee 30,000 5) Miami -Dade County Code Compliance 114,304 6) Radon Gas Fee 20,011 7) Fire Plan Review Fee 38,021 8) Ground Cover Fee 2,012 9) Land Use/Zoning 2,589 10) Zoning Review for Building Permit Fee 60 11) Certificate of Occupancy Fee 250 12) Application Fee 35 Total of all Non-Im pact Fees $ 3,580,870 Total of all Fees for Project $ 7,185,282 Source: City of Miami Planning, Bilding and zoning Department, Miami Dade County Impact Fees 13 02-1249 OSeptember _ . 2002 MEMORANDUM TO: All Employees NICHOLS FROM: Bruce Brosch BROSCH SANDOVAL RE: AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PLAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. lyg G{'o Submitted a record iso c.oi`'g t 4 cY �.],11 item Wil --c prasc``ia �• ,.. city UrafK Architecture & Planning It is the policy of NICHOLS BROSCH SANDOVAL & ASSOCIATES, INC. to base employment on merit, qualifications and competency and its personnel practices will not be influenced by an applicant's or employee's race, color, place of birth, religion, national origin, sex, age, marital status, veteran or handicapped status. One of the management duties of all principals at NICHOLS BROSCH SANDOVAL & ASSOCIATES, INC. is to ensure that the following personnel practices are being satisfied: 1. Take every necessary affirmative action to attract and retain qualified employees. 2. Maintain equitable principles in the recruitment, hiring, training, compensation and promotion of employees. 3. Monitor and review personnel practice to guarantee that equal opportunities are being provided to all employees. NICHOLS BROSCH SANDOVAL & ASSOCIATES, INC. is committed to take affirmative action and aggressively pursue activities that will serve to enhance our total participation, in good faith, and enable qualified employees and applicants the opportunities available throughout this organization. Clearly, the above actions cannot be accomplished as a secondary duty for any individual despite the full support of management. And so, to scrutinize our efforts, NICHOLS BROSCH SANDOVAL & ASSOCIATES, INC. has assigned Bruce F. Brosch for the firm in charge of personnel, as the Affirmative Action director to monitor all activities of this program. NICHOLS BROSCH SANDOVAL & ASSOCIATES, INC. Affirmative Action Plan, as approved by Metropolitan Dade County, and established by the principals of the firm, is the minimum effort that the principals of the firm, will expend in promoting the use of disadvantaged and minority business in this community, and providing economic opportunities. The firm is and will continue to exceed the plan goals and objectives. The Affirmative Action Plan is based on the principals' belief that our Dade County Community can only improve if the lifestyles of every single disadvantaged group in the community is advanced. A commitment exists from our firm that as it grows and matures, special emphasis will be sought to find and provide opportunities for professional, managerial and partnership opportunities for all minorities. Almeria Avenue amoral Gables, Florida 33134 Tel (305) 443.5206 Fax (305) 446-2872 Aue W1h Email info@nbsorch.com sarch.com AACW002-1249 AAC 000680 , amoll HOTELS -RESORTS •SUITES Submitted (rttc t'1e PUbiic record kr,,z item _EL,�ll I. POLICY STATEMENT Priscilla A Cityiea Our company policy is to provide equal employment opportunities to all applicants and employees without regard to race, color, religion, sex, age, national origin, handicapped condition or status as disabled and/or Vietnam era -veteran and to affirmatively seek to advance the principles of equal employment opportunity. The company takes affirmative action to unsure that applicants and employees are not discriminated against because of their status as handicapped persons. Miami Marriott Dadeland 9090 South Dadeland Boulevard Miami, Florida 3315t, 30516'0-1035 Far 305/670-7540 We affirm that the above policy and the Affirmative Action Program herewith reflect the company's attitude and its intention to: 1. Recruit, hire, train and promote for all job classifications without regard to handicapped condition. 2. Base decisions on employment so as to further the principles of equal employment opportunity for qualified handicapped persons. 3. Insure that all other personnel- actions such as compensation, promotions, benefits, transfers, terminations, Company -sponsored training, education tuition assistance, social and recreation programs are administered without regard to handicapped condition. The company, in compliance with the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 maintains a written Affirmative Action Program is made available to employees, upon request, in the Personnel Department during working hours. Overall responsibility for directing and implementing the policy enunciated herein and the Company's Affirmative Action Program for qualified handicapped persons has been assigned to Madelaine Fumero, 9090 S. Dadeland Boulevard, Miami, FL 33156,305-671-5021, who serves as the company's Equal Employment Opportunity Coordinator. All personnel actions are analyzed to insure that this policy and the Affirmative Action Program are being properly implemented. The company is determined to be in full compliance with the provisions of the law and of the Affirmative Action Program. 02-x.249 t7 A :i: Few. ■ ■ VIP �' it r i__ —• �� � I a � OF�. �=i s G �iMe .�'@. : ri `a � •'AFS . .Y, �.�T �.��� '�'r , T ;�',A' ®'IR• "6, •j -'k.1, -v "'A A. I�w• 2271 SP 1 ik PRO i,A C). W Conceptual Grading Plan PROPOSED LANDSCAPE DEVELOPMENT PLAN Ai VC V;IT ok, lki � iv Call, CA* V- k� AV, 51 8 REVIEW wDft -coo f7: CV cori j� . . . . . . . . . . TRACT C TRACT B WEST TRACT ©EAST EVIL —U, PROPOSED FLOOR PLANS 200 RETAIL & PARKINUELEVRE SCALE 1'-394r r-7 L2 iEARING BOA .. _ I NIS REVIEW PC 2271 A 2 TRACT' D WEST TRACT D EAST TRACT -AN j7t�-- -- MIC -1 TRACT B WEST 1-1- -All PODIUM FLOOR PLANS ALL MUM - SCALE 1'-30-0' TRACT B EAST 77117 C,F 14E ool TRACT' D WEST TRACT D EAST TRACT -AN j7t�-- -- MIC -1 TRACT B WEST 1-1- -All PODIUM FLOOR PLANS ALL MUM - SCALE 1'-30-0' TRACT B EAST 77117 C,F 14E 1 TRACT D WES TRACT D EASE wwu%N -At APART—S FIRST UNION TOWER i PLAZA W''ARINO BOP. � ...'.; REVIGL' P. e r M Q7 . NO *Act c m- *ol-k m275 a SpWw"WFUT MALT 5 usr n - S" 400 OISCAW KUWODI . .7, CL CL Q7 . NO *Act c m- *ol-k m275 a SpWw"WFUT MALT 5 usr n - S" 400 OISCAW KUWODI . .7, I .\Ir1l lL IA1�ILJ LL\1L�\U I OWRM i�AlY 4MFM rUfIP FtNYN NINTIAR tAD1T iwYN. Att'EM (OLOR4 A9 MUIGTPD ii • .. I s ,, (l `r �py 'J:I ' MPARIPSYTAMTMLEDUIwLNUM ill RVNAR I.UM FMI91ALlMUIUM IMMMU. /(^ r V/YI Q� IIIRRR... III � '., 1 BttYMfRDOF,DWNABL6 RYNAR IAMf PDASN NtF.D ALUMNNIM LW WAS, � —_ _ - ••.•• _ �- �� _� o-.a •.N.w.a - DR0. p.A38 ASSBLYLIR I 1yI nMFDfIRbrA®GLASS SALIISILSD89 �+ rlrr tltl i•1-1 InIJIIII L KYNAX ASSBW IALU— ,. •. I_anj' I �,(„_ lI IIL l�[l �flli_. nn QI:L MIL SNAl1 NlAT ABOVE NNIMI iLDaR AND rRfISTAJ'OBNKT EZInslcY uaxTilxivse ��cq 1 9 ul an Ts BT ITI tAkWftfWKTIEIE WALL MNr19. Q s m Q�y�tL I _InBL3 I I �__ �[7 9 PM.ISIYDUMNYE WALL tANE1.3 . luc'IDMeRk RaarwDM AmRANe. N -.h-n �1 u[� M1n InI N1_HE 37 nr e� l [per_. RI1 T1 Q"I fR� , rm I� uJISL ••�• ROMDiw � WRN RYNAR rAMfiM SN �� � si rrAl 1NUtn ! Ill [EILDIDCOIiRNf ATODYPf®LODUTAf D. MBLAL YIWJMDWYN eXTOIl01l OrADBOYrMIM NiATI@q AND SMOOTM®ImiT NAR1cR iYNM. i A,� Ml 13 II [III Um.. rm ri fill i J !1 cul cINBNA MARgne AssEMxY a�sTArtaeesas®LAND I � MwaAmmDin,Y slmuucNARAcres. � � :_ � ml Im o.'11 11tn1- I iM� .G.MA MouNlronraal�DRTara nAD _ �[) u-, n caxcsert rBAw. �u! cmewAlAR nww,AND LaouA II � xsar mlaROLnNc Rre .imI V� U Rrrn { ,I rAvos ATuarANgy. , I{ SNAYRANnARBJTSROOBAf10[ >� AnL®DrowMDmv Mio. an C1111 m ri 1m �' I OPLL. 03 I - �2t Be p m 1m I �� ®.Iid_ Oe C1111 6:s ry �- MIA et 1�1 Ss ':"FICE OF NCARINO On m; rY IN Em 1e ee •-- _... -•••. FI.FLNS REVICY r r Works - i:aio rm ' nn n e s rtn Cly, Be ei ,_W. M � L`ae •_.... i a1IIL_ L� am �-O 00 ......, .;noir• - l:a:.... ' dy II .... _ .._ _IIan o14m'' I i it s•c. O i 7/56E.Df1 �I 1241 11'21[DISI TRAC�IWENT MIC, N CU �IN5iiUMY N/oMCAYNL �BMAY[ OOULLVO mmamLASfMt A6.1 SOUTHEAST FOURTH STREET ELEVATION SCALE 1: 30 BIAINIC—LA V' �o: SOUTHEAST SECOND AVENUE ELEVATION SCALE 1. 30 A _ .1; . •". WA L C I MA'rERIALS LEGEND WE—E PA AcceHr carat AE AHI — _Al rApll Ppb --m- -AR —E OPITA—AND VES CCOHCRpIP - PAVERS AT EACH PA.. - , r, n" rx.5!ui 07 HEARING BOA, CLANS ncvl-,%v ' 4 : 141i J I ' cTj q!14 C4 cq C) 0 Tt cx- IL co :tf SOUTHEAST SECOND AVENUE ELEVATION SCALE 1. 30 A _ .1; . •". WA L C I MA'rERIALS LEGEND WE—E PA AcceHr carat AE AHI — _Al rApll Ppb --m- -AR —E OPITA—AND VES CCOHCRpIP - PAVERS AT EACH PA.. - , r, n" rx.5!ui 07 HEARING BOA, CLANS ncvl-,%v ' 4 : 141i J I ' cTj q!14 C4 cq C) 0 SOUTHEAST THIRD STREET ELEVATION SCALE I: 30 MATERIALS LEGEND �,� lLowr cEMBNrrusTegrW,Sx oven YIA9D1I0. r aumT[nre rA W r rmisll. ACCHIFODLORTN DDNCATBD III D1lACT III�IYTANF'M 9DOI.ALND W KYNARIAIM iWIL1 ALNRTNMItAMB10. l l 6FplM TlODe. DlnpnBll KYNAR .A W r Dmx fOD,UALIMgMF LOIIT'OIB. ,.� reIIEDRlAND[®. UlA53 A5K89B31.DT9. T T—TE—S— Q—E-- 6 reREO ULATSBALDBF[ADETQ ABOVE- 1,.0011E wuKrNM A.MTNALUMDNM A1K,5ea ROVE lIIII$N F1t,p11 AND [E619T A 1' OBIECI. . llllgt LK,HTFuIURE W �KYNAR FINITII ATT C,UNcq RFIF W F� N'11.ISIIBO-ANDI wA11 �1ANEIS9 IB. TTA91(NAPMIC RIXIFIN(: MEMBMNP 1I IANWNO TEAM WYUI.A EB —A INELgU%WO A YnINI 1'INlvll ill OE MFIA SnIDTyT/ cuVFRED LlM Al EIA O[MEc.YrT11M 91D'Al„WD ANU 'R vMt%,TH (iMFN.YI ASn!q FINI911 cI BTR�METEOSTETI YRUDwIx ALUMIMIM cFADI%NO WI I IF Bn('KLrt YKWAIIFtNARACFEMS. �I. 1n51M5IAKFN VIDEO YANPl 11 �W I(%.LTIIED 9nMR CLAD ' FMEIeb w� W IRYTaPBc'q.OIYD CONCReTEu _•••• ..nrrw�u 1AVEl3 AT GclI PANel+.. 9EMttMN91AwEM1 TUYflORAlIIK' �"'� ' SCIEGM A!l1.IFO IO WINDOW WFl,. �M. .w I; i; P t. I- " . ' 7L'ARINO BOA. 2271 1� v-+ l� �!�` p_o (�9p �FW+ i W F - , /V) . NIA a - �3 /Ey rm /tII0 SOUTHEAST THIRD STREET ELEVATION SCALE I: 30 MATERIALS LEGEND �,� lLowr cEMBNrrusTegrW,Sx oven YIA9D1I0. r aumT[nre rA W r rmisll. ACCHIFODLORTN DDNCATBD III D1lACT III�IYTANF'M 9DOI.ALND W KYNARIAIM iWIL1 ALNRTNMItAMB10. l l 6FplM TlODe. DlnpnBll KYNAR .A W r Dmx fOD,UALIMgMF LOIIT'OIB. ,.� reIIEDRlAND[®. UlA53 A5K89B31.DT9. T T—TE—S— Q—E-- 6 reREO ULATSBALDBF[ADETQ ABOVE- 1,.0011E wuKrNM A.MTNALUMDNM A1K,5ea ROVE lIIII$N F1t,p11 AND [E619T A 1' OBIECI. . llllgt LK,HTFuIURE W �KYNAR FINITII ATT C,UNcq RFIF W F� N'11.ISIIBO-ANDI wA11 �1ANEIS9 IB. TTA91(NAPMIC RIXIFIN(: MEMBMNP 1I IANWNO TEAM WYUI.A EB —A INELgU%WO A YnINI 1'INlvll ill OE MFIA SnIDTyT/ cuVFRED LlM Al EIA O[MEc.YrT11M 91D'Al„WD ANU 'R vMt%,TH (iMFN.YI ASn!q FINI911 cI BTR�METEOSTETI YRUDwIx ALUMIMIM cFADI%NO WI I IF Bn('KLrt YKWAIIFtNARACFEMS. �I. 1n51M5IAKFN VIDEO YANPl 11 �W I(%.LTIIED 9nMR CLAD ' FMEIeb w� W IRYTaPBc'q.OIYD CONCReTEu _•••• ..nrrw�u 1AVEl3 AT GclI PANel+.. 9EMttMN91AwEM1 TUYflORAlIIK' �"'� ' SCIEGM A!l1.IFO IO WINDOW WFl,. �M. .w I; i; P t. I- " . ' 7L'ARINO BOA. 2271 ---- -r MATERIALS LEGEND `•e - ■ I ■ ® ■ IN■ 'I OVYL TYRYILSwIfAC PlEEYi®L ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ DIMRRESIRTANT E per. of � ■B■s■■■e -M1111 IN ■ T ■ ■ T EI 6PANOR 1 UL.LRS A95EL0I1C4 ■ ■ ■' s ■ r ■ ■ ■ ■ e ■ xRRDD wR, W DETMDE, a; �; ■ ■ ■ ■ ■' ■ ■ �. ■ ■ ■ T AbOVP F1NWl PLOfR. f ^t � �..:� ■ ■ a; a s' A ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ D. ;EY;L�IALIA,INDN ®.�:� ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ 1. LLRE•Y �BOV6PDDRN 'd ILODA AN>xE91RTwP ObIECf. ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ s ■ ■ ■ ■ cq �t s LNx,T�ATD.R ■®�sWIN MENA■ ARPI� Q Sl ® ■ FMMLq. S RET[WAIL PANP.LR. l > � S `� ■ ■ ! ■ ■ ® ■ ■ ■ ■ ® ■ I RANITE WAIL PANP.W. !I - ■ ■ ■ ®' ■ ■ ■ ■ IN ■ N' RDDUNG YEYNRANR. ® ■ Is ® ■ Is IN s Is IN IS III STANDI s6Ui 019UTATED WE rJ ® ■ ■ ■ ■;■ IN s -■ e IN .. OfiPA6AT COVERED LIXIGIAR NLTAL 9TUM MO WUN RRIP.YOII L-. CL ® ® ■ ■ ■-l■ ■ ■ Is IN ■ � nxADEDYPsuN 9NGTNINOANo SMI%i111l EMPNT PLARTEI PPilsll. 1 •, 4 ®■ ! X10 ■ ■ ■'■ ■ ® ® ® L'INEPAANA0. ,� e s ■'■ ■`■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ..A ' DR.FSRai--ur � ® �I® �I.■ ■ ® � _■ ® UNINUY CIADDING wITII ■ ■ ■ ■ ®� ■ IN mass RACr rtSpNAOR TYMRERR A PLASMA xCREFN ViDPpyANRL IN ® �.�_ ® ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ YDIINTlDME0.W1®SIDHI p/�D N LANCRRTR fIYYRR. Is 01 ■�._ on B IN s ■ 151 wNUEWALRR PIwTw4 AND lOD01A ■ s is ®■ ■ s NINEW_ ■ ® ■ ■ -� IN IN IN IS EEW�MNTREA: ■ I RUFJIDM . ■■e■■■ase®® ■■■slip s■■■■■ s_rw�■■'■Is IS ■■■■■'■a■o■ ISSMMnMMMMMMMM es.s■■■■Rs■■ now. .s■■■■s■ Z ■s■■MM■■■■■ s■■■■■s •'I ■■wm ■ *101 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ C- of wMARING BOA ,. ■ s L■�j � ■ f s ■ s PLANSIeEvl +,/ < mm I _ ■�■■f_sA■_0s■■ IN INEW son's .. •oho � ■ �■�■■.�� ' :' •moo � 4_■■��■■■��■■ _...®� ■■es■■e■sso i O o • 4, : INi1i . Ion � ■ ®. ■ � ■ � � _■ ■ . a __ •EOO s ■ ■ 0 Ll ■ -O-A ■-■ 33'!1 URTH L19CAYNERIDULLttYAAM' WAYIu 'I,I tlGtT f R LL TMRD STRW TIpT UNIONTowER LL L[COND cxur i W LOUTtl LYCAYNL I __ l_ � LTLLLT LUIIAINO ' BISCAYNE BOULEVARD ELEVATION . I SCALE I: 30 DRAPxIC LCAI.e �•�•�� •• •� ,••--• 40 �� I I i Ie� MATERIALS LEGEND o\r�.K�%uttveuesn,�re wrirtaan. Al „ � '.� y .M/ALT AP313TAH�TMLT�DIAiIxDw ,} . , y� - ., KTMAK rAIMfw duN rKANwa. .y „"i � s�'a -� �•.+_•v..�. )I SR1KAf MOOP.MAdAKL6KYNAR /Adf �. �o�^^^^f/' i e a fdlsu N[eo ALUwMIN touvxu. T.1-1A.—I.—A15-11— /xk. ��tt i{[ �� � ° ° f t ApERFDOLAL9 xAI.118TKAI1E9 I aY i�� '� el C\'NAK IAdifIM6N ALUAIINNf PY ys._ �d -M fIAOl ANI111ELSiAY OBIFCi. �I ' � °�.� � � � �� �� -•••• t TCA YMAK fIN15\lN� lu 1DNM FllANIND qp �� �,P,PwALL/AxE� -. : . ��INfEDDAAMx�wAu.AMx�. Q ��� �� �I IJI ELASTOM 9MMIN%UI_A MBRAME. sTAMdnc suNlMuurPn y� I WMAI. tANPL IIODfMO dp � ,-",.. MKYNAR tAM fMlsl. gap 0 -_ /-pJ � � -� 3. �IMWOLd/IW AT WYxxxO LODDW drr( /W� �-- V MO0.AOE0Ylri1N WxAlMwOAMD � Y_ le pp' Rio � 1I1 , DUMICOAMMfW1EKFlnIW. . CINOM MAKQIILLAYFMN.T a LrAwlxu nrLL AMo KnEnrxwAaeauucrNu 1141ual�x.feo�rmorAMeL ee PIER 11 � COMLIICiBPxAfW. u ILiY��OIJI lug, NmewALKs, n.Aw.AMo eoomA \ 110 ' _.' .\,LsoPcaaKmmncwxle . vws AT xA01rAMR IA— �� m RUN 00 °° °° 1313 1312 an 9313 1313 D° �so °° -- ,.c i .. BEARING BCA.: SOmm 1 l=:EVI::1313 2M cc RUN S'V ss �r on pili130 141 ......................... i 2271 L L __ �;, i;, ,,... CAmucro s LL.SN" A6.5 • .19YNLgULLVALOWSOUTHEAST THIRD AVENUE ELEVATION Awsn�Lw�oac SCALE I: 30 W ■ .r,l � 1�'r�i 1 1 1 1 1 i .,...' ■ 1 ■ d 1� 1 1 1 1 �� A.. ■ I. I ■ ■1 1 I I la--_ —�— ■■ ■ I ■ 4 1 1 1 1 1 . ■ ■ I. -I ■ /� 1 I 1 I I � ■ 1'I r d _ _I I I I� _�sI •■ ■ I I ■ /� _I_I I I 1 r■ ■ I ■ ■1 �� I I I Imo__- �wYl���■■■■YYw ■ww ■w■■■w■■w■� rra■ � I 1 I t ■ �� I 1 l i� _ ir_ o'Tii I GG LIN= mior IA I I 1 H.� . . �■ www ww _-- "- - 1y y ww 77 71711,11, OEM IN Ilk �i� i yl •—�t�a, jet► �} � �f� i `�_�t � .� �. � � �. ,��•� .II ,_. ,_ '��„ � L g_,_ � I`I:I �I� !a , �i ss c.� w // 1 — j1 Il 1,L __ ° ° MATERIALS LEGEND !I' t ;1 .• _� Y f ! 1. :I. l '� L.,.I NoO tt�Pi 1 j SMOOTH PLOATCTA@Ni PIw41FR PpLW � , II 11 I .. _ ��� OVER IMSOMtY 91185T1AT6 rA01T PIMSit �. 7' �••III pii+AirA�prurArrtTareoawowa - 11911 IFF L', 3NMMr6DDi,DRADM•19[YNAl.Aa �• y� L� 11 >m�iFl i1N1fN r1>DOALIMMIMIWVYM. '�"•2 '.I:� l LJ 'i11 17i ®1 j1 MmtALu 141 TaibDYAtAlIIeLOIAii A63EM M. ... •..w TNIYD,PWe119DOlASi &LLIATMDfS "V ��1:Lz �� ;.._-, ®® InL aouv.L I'� �rAeoveramlrLoaL � li D1 �iI CYNAA rAMiPpRN ALIMMW 4'".A , 1® G��� 1���I1ijII 't_ I I +'3 .1.11 �lJ II '111 h uvuL'IGAlfPA9LY. �� NAI....,.Al�eral•, Mui Fl.00e ANDRMRT AI.OBIeCi. --ty _ ®1 tf00tty¢ 6CITlIve IYIMT iRNIN E— .-iI(( iI Ci11 rOLi51®OMNIR WM.L PANPI6. . 1 LL� .1 ., h �mLiw.t IO lA3TOMe11MRO0PM0 MHM9uNe. (Vl in 1'l.f_�l U�1�L._ ®1 1 BPANDING SP MIN3UTATPD 4PTAL rAND. ROONNO ful c aao LoiFmAiwv®mL000ue _ALe„IDen.,D.,IM..,Y.ID. m r�� --m- --AND om. hul °�= 11L'_1=11 �L 11 AL aAOdHD wix _ I Iroolk.il BACSIIf1WNAQ OIAMCt9.9. 111 M"Aolai"'A K1�1 V0Fq rANFl j1 liDarOW1a061dieftAO u LL 1' (11'�._:il ®■ fONClleTe i3.M18f. l 1 -IT ���77 °■ 1 :.l 1 L�L1. InouveL.I ALYS WLTA.OR®CQIO816A 77 I 1' AVep AT eACN IAM -T_ °° Iwlna I v...M1iN MiA.INf,VIGeOLVNIC w®rowpwvaro. J �L ImLi,• ILL mLi,IL 1 1 1 11 mLP�iL K- z if7.LL lir 1 I I . A1'[KUC 3756.[. FOURiIi-STREET '� TNIRDAVENUE RETAIL •CUVLMA 0 5 IS 30 10 30 60 M M 90 100 I30 300 I30 300 FEET 'T'Sh 012'WARINO 0 1.3 6A 13 9.1 .3 15.3 16.3 313 36A 37A uTI 30.5 45.7 30.0 60.7 77.0 76.3 91.4 100.0 METERS n • �,U•.;�"•i � GRAPHIC SCALE SOUTHEAST FOURTH STREET ELEVATION — WEST END "D'`° "c1e -_�Y A6.7 SCALE 1116'-I'4• : . RAI CEO!SEIM , .. I II Ir ' _ In. IMP RI 01 IV qtr. _J i �� It M Iw. I■x N as -.... Wool _.• ..... f,e... . ® m • _ww. Is R liii i lid t� t, 1 tr•.._ - -Jl •t (f IIr ■ Iaae :r5 oil n.. J e �•.ri II — _ m f�i r ifii _ n ��• t � � . , .. u�t■.. J —fir if ee u +ao R It I■� jobr ■ �"�16 19 e ■ IdE `�1 1how-01el a � rm ®Ir ore 10e >s� Id II INt.. JAI l77 ars VON Naoe u■ ■rr ■rr rrr ■r■ r■• If trr ow err trr err trr trr �U trR N�'Rr■ �' __ =� i �ilte�lois'wi iiia U oann 5�� vti ■ _�I �_I ■ ..,r, ■, u h ,, i■ ..e all 111 IN 1■ .h r ■ -n ■ _ •:;•-.-Ir,..',► i■ -e 11 CI -:■ Is '61 .r ■.:.■ ■:.•. r._: ■„u" IN ;.•n ■I a .Ir:'.,h • •. .• ■ ■ ■ n• ► ._.n a YO el i■ I■.. -..► • r a _ . � x t�MM r61• re ON avm t■� s r � =� r.■e■. Y fffflfl• I. d 0 "ll. AYENVE215 S.F. FOUkTH STREET MUSTRAYSARX TRACT : EAST 9XISTIM PLAEA MUTH WAYNE DWAYNE BOULEVARD BUILDING SITE SECTION FACING NORTH SCALE r:70 ,A::., y NUILDING SMIND STREET 251 &i.5i(WND WENVI TRARc I.E. MURTH STREET RXISTING 275 S.F. MURTHSTREFT RISCA"CDOMEVARDWAY M..Nl. SITE SECTION FACING EAST SCALE 1-30 NEARING ROA; C?C w L 1. - 9, : 1091i J I * all An Archaeological and Historical Assessment of Miami One -Parcels, Miami, Florida by Robert S. Carr Mark Lance Victor Longo Stephanie Faulkner Archaeological and Historical Conservancy, Inc for Miami One, Inc. AHC Technical Report #382 July 2002 02-1249 re -l"ord An Archaeological and Historical Assessment of Miami One -Parcels, Miami, Florida by Robert S. Carr Mark Lance Victor Longo Stephanie Faulkner Archaeological and Historical Conservancy, Inc for Miami One, Inc. AHC Technical Report #382 July 2002 02-1249 record in the public 1 t.+ iJA o.A iE d 'ls�Ji 7� ECS, '.s';on x',�;:?3�y 6 item or tt-lq-o, Table of Contents Priscilla A. City Clew List of Figures ii Consultant Summary 1 Project Setting 3 Previous Research 4 Cultural Summary 6 Methodology 10 Results and Conclusions - 14 Recommendations 20 References Cited 23 Appendix 1. Miami One Auger Hole Log 27 Appendix 2. Miami One Parcels B and C Field Specimen Log 37 Appendix 3. Archaeological Investigations/Monitoring Projects in Downtown 42 Miami and Vicinity and Their Impacts on Development i 02-1249 List of Figures 1. Map of Miami One Area 2. Map of Miami One Tract C Auger Holes �11 �y �r l 9YyC�5 � ,�r�. '�h'3 5 s recora items Prlsciila A. a City 2 12 3. Map of Miami One Tract B Auger Holes 13 4. Map of Miami One Tract C showing Archaeological Material 15 5. Map of Miami One Tract B Archaeological Material 16 6. Map of Miami One Tract C showing Undisturbed Significant Soil Types 17 7. Map of Miami One Tract B showing Undisturbed Significant Soil Types 18 8. Miami One Profiles showing Ground Elevation and Top of Bedrock 19 9. Map of Miami One Tract C Area of Archaeological Sensitivity 21 10. Map of Miami One Tract B Area of Archaeological Sensitivity 22 ii 02--1249 Submitted int itern Pliscifla A. Consultant Summary F D p r In July 2002; an archaeological assessment was conducted of Parcels B and C of the Miami One project. This assessment included an archival review and test hole augering of the two parking lots. A total of 50 auger holes, each being six inches in diameter, were dug. All of the recovered sediments were screened and all cultural materials collected. These tests and the archival review indicate that Parcels B and C are highly disturbed from the previous construction and subsequent demolition of the Royal Palm Hotel, as well as from modern road and parking lot construction. Nonetheless, auger hole evidence indicates that prehistoric and Wh-century historic refuse occurs on the parcel. Significant desposits of black dirt midden and prehistoric artifacts and refuse were identified on the parcel, particularly in the southern part of parcel B, and the southwestern corner of parcel C (Figures 4,5). Also located in parcel C was the historic bayshore, a location favorable for the deposition of artifacts (Figure 7). It is recommended that the development of Miami One be conducted in a manner that will minimize any possibility of a work stoppage or obstructions relative to the archaeological materials that occur on the parcel. A proactive mitigation plan is presented in this report. This plan recommends dividing the parcel into small work areas (approximately 50 -foot square) and that the archaeologists will record any possible features and document the site prior to construction activities. Although monitoring by archaeologists of initial groundbreaking and construction excavation activities will still be a requirement, a pro -active archaeological program will reduce and minimize any potential work obstructions relevant to archaeological discoveries that might occur during construction. It is worth noting that of the twenty previous archaeological excavations and monitoring projects conducted at developments in downtown Miami and along Brickell Avenue, which included the discovery of human remains at five of these sites, only one discovery, the Miami Circle, resulted in any obstruction or delay to a developmental project (see Appendix 3). To date, no human remains or significant features have been detected on the project parcel. However, if such features exist they should be uncovered and documented as part of the archaeological mitigation program - 02 -1249 Sri Submitted I [Ito 4h f3 iG. record in NE item PZ- 0, i A, NC 5 T 116 Pare Is 71 City Cemetery Venetian I I Fit ----------- Ffagrer Memorial' 10 lbrary San Marco I Biscayne Calan Radio Tower ft (WQAM)r' I.T 143 N San 6 t. 'Par w Jr `Lt atso .Parke.� -J -,Light ``.Heliport i;V- 1-1 T7WW— City Docks 37 w It, C, 0 Lights Z 5 NW sr 2 City -Yar M 8, t, asin Light mm _P, ME 0 ST �7!! 37 ST 1: Sri hom Sf Libr eLight Lxv� 9 2 D Project Parcel "Light AL J� ti Fit LS t iJ�381, ,a Dodge I C". sr I Light Ftiahe Light: q Point View L,ght,7 t 9 Ali Light Figure 1. Map of Miami One Area scale Twp. 54S, Rng. 42E, Section 38 0 1/2 1 Mile Source: USGS Miami Quadrangle (1969) I 02=120 Project Setting Priscida- A„ City: The Project parcels cover an area of 4.204 acres and are located in the downtown Miami. Parcel C is 1.74 acres and measures 330 feet along its east -west alignment and about 230 feet along its north - south boundaries. Parcel B is 2.464 acres, and is 460 feet by 230 feet respectively. Both are located in Township 54S, Range 42E, Section 38. The relevant USGS map is the Miami Quadrangle, FL (1969). The properties are bounded on the north by SE 3rd Street, on the west by SE 2nd Avenue, and on the south and east by Biscayne Boulevard. The USGS soil map for the parcel describes the parcel as Urban lewd, or an area where more than 85% of the surface is covered by shopping centers, parking lots, streets, sidewalls, buildings, houses, and other structures where natural soils are not easily observed. The soils in the remaining open areas are mainly Udorthents. These soils have generally been altered by land grading and shaping or have been covered with about 18" of extremely stony, loamy fill. Test holes dug on the parcel indicate that construction debris and fill of various types occur across the property, but remnants of light to medium gray sand occur there indicating the t3rpical pinewood environment that would have existed there prior to development. The parcel is located on a natural limestone ridge, known as the Atlantic Coastal Ridge, which underlies most of urban Miami. Elevations on the parcel average 8-10 feet above sea level. The parcel's elevation is high enough and sufficiently distant from the river (about 300 to 600 feet), that fill requirements prior to the construction of the Royal Palm Hotel would have been minimal. The property is a vacant parcel used for commercial parking. The parcel has been used for parking for at least 50 years., Prior to that use, it was the site of the Royal Palm Hotel, built by William Flagler in 1896, which was demolished after the 1926 hurricane. The hotel building footprint was largely on Parcel D to the north, which included an elevated swimming pool. The pool house measured approximately 80 feet by 180 feet and was located on the northwest corner of parcel D. A railroad spur built to bring materials for building the Royal Palm Hotel entered Parcel D from its west boundary and extended eastward on the north side of the hotel (Figure 4). The hotel proper had a basement cut into the limestone bedrock. Parcels B and C were largely used as gardens with a brick way extending north -south from the hotel to the Miami River. Prior to the construction of the hotel, the parcel was part of the pioneer Miami settlement associated with Ft. Dallas, a military encampment that was occupied intermittently between 1836 and 1858 on the north bank of the Miami River. Many of the principal structures associated with the fort were located closer to the river and the bay, and were probably within subject parcels B and C. 3 02-1249 Ui B 5064o 1.5 In"o L: ti .... tlr'GJbE '.D record in -on?*,,,-,-, , item fz -1 ck, A-Iq-_oy- Previous Research Priscilla A. � .. , City (., !ei-;�, A review of Florida's Division of Historic Sites file in Tallahassee, and files in Miami -Dade County's Historic Preservation Division indicates that site 8DA11 is recorded in the immediate vicinity of the subject parcel. A component of 8DA11, located adjacent and directly northeast of the parcels, was monitored in 1983 during the construction of the Southeast Bank Building. In addition, burial mound 8DA14, previously destroyed, was located on or near the north boundary of parcel B. Several other prehistoric and historic sites are located within a quarter mile of the parcel on both the north and south banks of the Miami River. The subject- parcels are located within one of the City of Miami's Archaeological conservation areas. The earliest investigation of archaeological sites on the Miami River occurred in 1884 when Andrew Douglass, on his ship Seminole, visited six different mounds in the area and excavated a sand burial mound south of the mouth of the river, uncovering only a ceramic bowl. Douglass classified the Miami mounds into two categories: sand and rock, and was of the opinion that only the sand mounds were of significance (Douglass, 1884). One of the mounds he visited was 8DA14, located near the north boundary of parcel B prior to its destruction by the construction of the Royal Palm Hotel. In 1949, archaeologist John Goggin created Florida's first site inventory and recorded seven sites at or near the mouth of the Miami River, including the historic village of the Tequesta, 8DA11, on the north bank of the river, and 8DA12 at Brickell Point on the south bank. Goggin and several of his students did some limited testing at Brickell Point, although he published no reports on this work (Goggin, 1949). In September 1956, avocational archaeologist Dan Laxson conducted excavations at the north bank of the Miami River at the site of the Dupont Plaza prior to its construction. His excavations uncovered a deep black dirt midden (Laxson 1959; 1968). In September 1958 through February 1959, Laxson dug at Brickell Point, stirred by the pending construction of the Elks Club there. He also conducted tests on the black dirt midden near the south bank of the Miami River in the vicinity of the Customs House. In 1961, test units were dug near the last remaining Brickell house by students Robert Carr and Mark Greene, who made extensive surface collections from beneath the house (Carr and Greene, 1961). They also documented a significant prehistoric site, 8DA1067, at the present location of the U.S. Customs House on the south bank of the river. In 1962-1963, Carr collected several Spanish artifacts from the grounds of the Granada Apartments at the present location of the Hyatt Knight Center. All of the artifacts collected by Carr and most of those collected by Greene repose at the Historical Museum of Southern Florida. In 1978, Florida's Division of Historic Resources directed salvage excavations of the Granada site, located on the west side of the Brickell Avenue Bridge. This site represents the western portion of site 8DA11. This work resulted in the recovery of tens of thousands of artifacts, shell refuse, and animal bone elements (Griffin et al.., 1985). It is worth noting that no outstanding features, such as holes cut into the rock (i.e. the Miami Circle) or prehistoric graves were 4 02--1249 encountered during that extensive investigation. Only one historic grave, that of an Anglo -Euro male from the mid -19'h century_ , was discovered, and those remains were exhumed and transferred to Tallahassee. In 1979-1980, the Dade County Historic Survey was initiated, which resulted in the documenting of several hundred sites across the county and the creation of a county historic preservation ordinance in 1981. In 1980, the county agency directed salvage excavations at the site of the last Brickell House, part of 8DA12, prior to the construction of a Holiday Inn (now the Sheraton Hotel), as well as the recovery of archaeological material during theexcavations of pilings for the Hyatt swimming pool (8DA 11). In 1998-1999, the Miami Circle, buried beneath an extensive black dirt midden was uncovered after the demolition of the Brickell Apartments at Brickell Point. This represented the northeast component of the Brickell site, 8DA12. A review of archaeological investigations and monitoring indicates that since 1956, a total of 20 major archaeological investigations and monitoring projects have been conducted on properties located in downtown Miami and adjacent to Brickell Avenue (see Appendix 3). Of. these, 18 have been conducted since 1978. Fourteen of these archaeological projects encountered significant artifacts and/or features, and only five (20%) encountered human remains. No discoveryof human remains resulted in a work stoppage. Four of the human skeletal discoveries resulted in the recovery of the remains, and in one case, the burials were preserved within the parking island entrance at the Atlantis Condominium. In fact, only the discovery of the Miami Circle, a unique prehistoric feature cut into the bedrock, has resulted in an adverse impact on a project development, which resulted in the public acquisition of the two -acre parcel. S re 6tt� Citt,'sC 02-1249 Submitted into the public re'}: o i s i r, item Pt-11..�_or. _11..-0 -o?- Cultural Summary Priscilla AN. City Clerk The project parcels are located within the Glades archaeological area, which includes all of southern Florida, as originally defined as a distinctive cultural area by Stirling (1936). Goggin (1947) defined more specific boundaries for the area and identified three inclusive sub -areas: the "Calusa" in southwest Florida, the "Tekesta" in southeast Florida and the Florida Keys, and the "Okeechobee" around Lake Okeechobee. Goggin classified these sub -areas on the basis of his recognition of their distinctive natural environments, the different tribes in those regions during historic times, and differences in the archaeological record. Since Goggirr's work, there have been several amendments to these definitions. Griffin (1974) noted Goggin's error in utilizing the names of historic tribes to name two of the sub -areas, and he saw no significant differences in the mates ial culture of southern Florida that was not due to variations in coastal environments or to different frequencies of trade pottery. Further, Griffin (1974) believed that the occupation of southern Florida was generally coastal, with the Everglades being considerably less significant and containing only small midden sites, which indicate many short term occupations through the centuries. Based on this belief, he tentatively suggested that the term "Circum -Glades" Area be applied to the area from the Ten Thousand Islands eastward through southeast Florida and northward to St. Lucie County. Unfortunately, this reclassification of the Glades area and the misconception of the insignificance of the Everglades sites have been furthered by a book on Florida archaeology. The oversight was compounded by the statement that sites are distributed "around the Everglades (with only few sites actually in the Everglades proper)" (Milanich and Fairbanks 1980:233). The contention that sites are concentrated on the coast and are scarce in the Everglades is partially incorrect. Recent archaeological surveys in the Everglades (Carr et al., 1979; Carr et al., 2002) and within the Big Cypress Swamp (Ehrenhard et al., 1978, 1979, 1980) indicate that there are at least several hundred sites situated within the south Florida interior, some of which are large, substantial sites that suggest more than just marginal or short term use. The term "Everglades Area'.' for southeast Florida was offered by Carr and Beriault to replace the "Glades" culture area (1984: 1-11). In 1988, Griffin concurred by using `Everglades Area" to describe southeastern Florida and the Florida Keys in his recent synthesis of South Florida archaeology (Griffin, 1988, 1989). It is difficult to determine an exact western boundary for the area, but Carr and Beriault (1984:2) suggest one west of the Shark River and east of Turner River, near the eastern boundary of Big Cypress Swamp. A northern boundary would be near the Broward- Palm Beach County line. Paleo Period (10000 B.C. to 8000 B.C.) Paleoindians lived in southern Florida in association with mammoths, bison, and other types of megafauna. Deposits of fossilized Pleistocene bone have been uncovered by dredging operations from several locations in southern Florida and from solution holes in south Dade County. These deposits yielded a wide range of grazing ungulates and sloths, indicating the presence of more extensive grasslands than present (Webb and Martin, 1974). With the extinction of the megafauna by about 11,000 B.P., Paleoindians apparently adapted to the emerging wetlands of southern Florida, and began to establish the patterns of subsistence that were to provide the basis G 02=1249 -07- of resource procurement for the subsequent 10,000 years. Evidence of the Paleo ppid °in southern Florida is now well established with the discovery of a late Paleo/Early Archaic site at Cutler in south Dade County (Carr, 1986). Radiocarbon dates of 9,640 f 120 years B.P. were determined for this site, which yielded evidence of exploitation of deer and rabbit, some marine fauna, and some indication of hunting extinct horse and peccary. However, the majority of data from this site reflects Indian adaptation to the extinction of New World megafauna. Archaic Period (6500 B.C. to 1000 B.C.) During the Post Glacial, the sea level rose and greatly diminished Florida's land size. It has been calculated that the rate of sea level rise was approximately 8.3 cm per 100 years from 6000 to 3000 B.F. That rate has decreased to about 3.5 cm per 100 years from 3000 B.P. to present (Scholl and Stuiver, 1967). By 5000 B.P., cypress swamps and hardwood forests characteristic of the sub -tropics began to develop in southern Florida (Carbone, 1983; Delcourt and Delcourt, 1981). The Archaic Period was characterized by an increased reliance on the shellfish and marine resources on the coast by the native populations, and a generally expanded hunting, fishing, and plant gathering base throughout southern Florida. Archaeologists were not aware until recently of the extent and nature of Archaic Period sites'in southern Florida. The earliest dated mid -Archaic archaeological materials are from the Bay West site, a cypress mortuary pond situated in Collier County northeast of Naples (Beriault et al., 1981). It is likely that the Bay West site was a hydric sinkhole that provided an "oasis" and water hole during the much drier mid -Archaic period. Radiocarbon dates recovered there indicate a temporal range of 5500 B.P. to 7000 B.P. This chronology and the cultural materials recovered, including preserved organic materials, are very similar to those recovered from Little Salt Spring 110 km to the north (Clausen et al., 1979). The mortuary pond is undoubtedly one of the characteristic types of cemeteries of the Archaic Period throughout central and southern Florida. A mid -Archaic Period site, the first from this period, was recently discovered in Broward County (Carr and Sandler, 1991). The site, 8BD1119, was discovered on Pine Island ridge. Characterized by a scatter of chert flakes and several mid -Archaic projectile points, the site appears to be lithic workshop for reshaping tools. Sites from the Late Archaic Period are becoming increasingly evident in southeast Florida. Sites dating from as early as 4000 B.P. have been located along Biscayne Bay (Carr, 1981 a,b,c), but Late Archaic horizons appear to be common place on Everglades sites. Radiocarbon dates in the. Everglades indicate early ages of 3050 f140 B.P. for the Peace Camp site (Mowers and Williams, 1972:18), and 4840 f 210 B.P. for Taylor's Head site (8BD74) (Masson et al., 1988:346). The Late Archaic Period is distinguished by the development of fiber -tempered pottery. The Orange series of fiber -tempered pottery is well documented by Cockrell (1970) on Marco Island, 7 02-1249 and undecorated fiber -tempered pottery has been recovered on the southeast coast at the`-Afl rit site (Carr, 1981c). Sites containing fiber -tempered pottery have been dated from as early as 3400 f 100 B.P. on Marco Island, and from ca. 2500 B.P. at the Firebreak site in Collier County, and from 3000 to 4000 B.P. along Biscayne Bay. Partial fiber and sand tempered pottery have been recovered from interior sites such as the Honey Hill site (8DA411), the 202nd Street site in north Dade County, and the Markham Park (8BD183) site in Broward County. The Glades Period (Ca. 750B.C. to 1750 A.D. Goggin (1947) defined. three periods for the Formative Era. Using decorated pottery types that have proven to be effective time markers, he created the Glades I, II and III periods. These divisions have proven most useful in extreme southern Florida. The Glades I Early period (750 B.C. to ca. A.D. 200) is characterized by the use of undecorated sand -tempered pottery. Appearance of the Ft. Drum decorated series indicates ceramic decorations in extreme southern Florida were developed by 500 A.D. While decorated types begin appearing during Goggin's Late Glades I period, future revisions of the Glades periods may simply make the Glades II Period coincide with the first appearance of decorated wares. During the Glades II period (A.D. 750 to A.D. 1200), shifts in ceramic styles allow archaeologists to accurately divide the period into three subperiods based on the relative frequency of certain decorative types (i.e., Key Largo Incised, Miami Incised, Sanibel Incised). Mound construction was also common place during this period, reflecting the rise of a stratified society with a select ruling and/or priest class. During the Glades II and III periods (A.D. 1200 to A.D. 1750), there was a shift in ceramic decorations and vessel shape in extreme southern Florida. Griffin (1974) reports the near absence of decorated pottery between A.D. 1000 and A.D. 1200. Occurrences of St. Johns tradeware and Belle Glade Plain ware increase along the east coast, and in general, a thriving trade network that brought a variety of exotic resources, such as lithic tools and ornaments, is evident. Historic Period (A.D. 1513 - A.D. 1900) The earliest historic reference to the town of Tequesta is on the Herrera map of 1514, where the town of "Chequesta" is depicted opposite the river's mouth. Although supporting documents are elusive, it is apparent that this place name is a result of Ponce de Leon's first Florida voyage in 1513, when he apparently anchored near Key Biscayne (Santa Marta), and perhaps either visited or learned from a Native informant of the large Indian town at the river's mouth. In 1567, Pedro Menendez initiated contact with the chief (cacique) of Tequesta through the help of Spanish mutineers who had been protected by the Tequesta during their landing there (Parks, 1983). Menendez left a contingent of Spaniards who built a chapel for a Jesuit cleric and built houses for the Christians. Menendez's settlement contained twenty-eight houses enclosed by a stockaded fort (True, 1945). After fighting broke .out between the Spanish and Indians, the settlement was abandoned in 1570. 02-1249 0 p e public k 9 w, tr In 1743, a second mission was attempted when Father Joseph Maria Monaco and JosepRy,�Jerk Alava left Cuba, and began a new settlement on the north bank of the Miami River. This attempt, which included the construction of a triangular wood fort, also failed. Alava found the native populations severely reduced in number encompassing remnants from different tribes around south Florida. These tribal remnants migrated to Cuba when Spain ceded Florida to England in 1763 (Romans, 1962). The depopulated town of Tequesta was soon occupied by English and Bahamian adventurers who began to visit and exploit the resources of the South Florida coast. ' The Seminoles and Miccosukis did not arrive into southern Florida en masse until the Second Seminole War, although some north Florida tribes, such as the Alachua, may have had settlements in the area earlier in the 19th century. The Seminoles never occupied the mouth of the Miami River because of the presence of white settlers and the establishment of Ft. Dallas, which operated intermittently from 1836-1858. After the Civil War, Seminoles began to trade at the frontier Miami settlement, bringing alligator skins, pelts, and plumes to trade for food, cloth and guns. The Ewan store, located in the old Ft. Dallas site, and the Brickell store on the south bank of the site, became focal points for Seminole trade (Carr 1981 c). The City of Miami's incorporation in 1896 was stimulated by the arrival of Flagler's railroad and the building of the Royal Palm Hotel. The hotel would be the only building to occupy the Miami One parcels in the twentieth century. E 02-1249 a� F F. ✓t ii"d rte..'- �.)�, , .,,__ ........_ Methodology C i t V C_; ; f< The purpose of this assessment was to determine the extent and nature of any archaeological or historical remains on the project parcels. Part of this task was to establish the location of the original shoreline, as early photographs suggest it cut through the project parcel area. It was felt that when this could be located by the soil types, there would be no need to sample the area that would have been underwater, for the area was later built up with modern fill and would contain no useful archaeological material. Research Design The assessment of parcels B and C encompassed two principal tasks: an archival -literature review and a field investigation. The .archival and literature review focused on all available relevant records, including site forms, archaeological reports, maps, aerial photographs (some dating back to 1918), and historical documents. This review of documents was very important because it resulted in the creation of a map overlay that revealed the location of the Royal Palm Hotel relative to the project parcel (Figure 5). Demonstrating the spatial relationship between the parcel and the hotel is important because it is probable that the construction of the Royal Palm Hotel and its subsequent demolition resulted in some intensive disturbances to the parcel's subsurface. The extent of those disturbances, depending upon their location, the depth of fill and natural soils relative to the limestone bedrock was used to determine the potential for in situ significant archaeological features surviving on the property. Field Work After the completion of the map overlay a field assessment was conducted. Since the parcel is completely .paved with asphalt and currently used for parking six days out of the week, an augering sampling technique was used. A grid was created across the parcel, and points marked at 50 -foot intervals. This resulted in 63 test points being located across the parcel. Because of cars, one of the test holes was offset from its grid location (hole 14). When the original shoreline was detected during augering, many of the holes to the east of it were not excavated (Figure 7). An additional few holes in the northeast part of parcel C were skipped because of the preponderance of fill and shallow bedrock discovered in surrounding holes. The total number of auger holes excavated was 50 (Figures 2, 3). Prior to digging, utility companies were contacted to determine whether any utility alignments were located within the parcel. Their review indicated that all known utilities are located at or near the sidewalks around the peripheral of the property, and thus would not be impacted by our tests. Sampling was done using a six-inch metal auger with a five-foot length mounted behind a truck. The auger operator indicated verbally at the completion of each test hole whether rock was encountered, all of which was recorded in the auger hole log (Appendix 1). In each auger hole, the stratigraphy was recorded as accurately as the conditions allowed (some holes filled with water, or were too deep to see near the bottom). See Appendix 1 for a description of each auger hole's soil stratigraphy. 10 All soils and debris that was uncovered from each test hole was sifted through a 11." screen and any cultural material, including artifacts, historic refuse and construction debris was recorded and generally collected. Each collection was placed in a self-sealing bag and assigned an FS number. Subsequently, each collection was cleaned, quantified and classified at the AHC lab in Davie, so that the parcel's cultural deposits could be described and interpreted. Any unexpected discoveries would be assessed in the field; any artifact would be brought to the AHC lab in Davie for analysis, and proper authorites would be notified. All test holes were then refilled by the auger machine's crew. µ. - E Vii: n JU .,, . �Wa 11 02=x.249 021 022 023 SE 3rd Street 024 025 026 27 C Toll B th 916 • 15 I� *20 019 918 017 w *8 09 010 Oil 012 013 014 *7 06 *5 04 •3 •2 1 Biscayne Boulevard Way or SE 4th Street Figure 2. Map of Miami One Tract C Auger Holes. * Positive Auger Hole III Lamp Post 0 25 50 feet * Negative'Auger Hole D ZF C) w� SE 3rd Street A Al - - 63 - 62 61 60 - 59 •58 57 X 56 X 55 o46 X47 048 X49 •50 051 X52 X 53 X54 • 45 044 •43 042 041 040 •39 X38 x 37 rotile • - • _ -- • - • Bl - • • - • X 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 Figure 3. Map of Miami One Tract B Auger Holes. • Positive Auger Hole ■ Lamp Post O Negative Test Hole E F� x Auger Hole Marked, But Not Dug R Biscayne Boulevard -j �. 0- 0 25 0 feet t' `C- C3 X 36 I e, 4,n — - �--, , LID 9 ;-1 2 , 0, Results and Conclusions An archaeological and historical assessment and archival review was conducted of parcels and C of the Miami One project. This assessment resulted in the determination that the subject parcels have been intensely impacted by the prior construction and demolition of the Royal Palm Hotel. Of the 50 test holes dug across the parcel, almost all revealed evidence of the hotel debris or of related construction activity. Unlike some parcels closer to the river (i.e. Brickell Point, Alandco), there was no evidence of a deep mantle of fill. The limestone bedrock was encountered, within most of the test holes, at a 2 to 4 foot depth below the current asphalt surface.Some test .holes did not reach rock, indicating an undulated bedrock surface within deeper I pockets of soil, and within other holes east of the historic bayshore, bedrock was encountered at depths of up to 9 to 10 feet, with increasing amounts of fill eastward on parcel B. Evidence of prehistoric activity occurs across much of the parcel as indicated by 12 (24%) of the holes revealing evidence of prehistoric refuse, specifically marine shell fragments such as lucine clam or Strombus, and faunal bone. Nine sherds of prehistoric pottery were recovered (see Appendix 2 for more detail). Only one other prehistoric artifact, fragments of a Strombus celt, was recovered (FS 11) in hole 10 in parcel C. - Black midden soil was encountered in many of the auger holes, oles, but in most cases it appeared to be at least partially disturbed. Eighteen auger holes showed evidence of intact black earth midden, representing the remnants of site 8DAI 1. This midden soil is typical of nearby archaeological sites such as Brickell Point (8DA12). These midden locations, largely in the southern half of parcel C, and in the southwestern comer of parcel B, indicate where the site is most intact, and where archeological excavations will need to focus (Figures - 6,7). Other significant archaeological sediments are undisturbed marine sediments abutting the historic shoreline. These sediments contain well preserved organic remains including wood, leaves, charcoal, and even possible prehistoric artifacts, as suggested by a small wood artifact fragment recovered from test hole 33 (FS 25). Five test holes in parcel B contained intact marine sediments and should be subject to archaeological excavations prior to construction activities because they contain evidence of environmental data and they are important in reconstructing the area's prehistory and history. The largest historic feature that characterizes the subject parcels is the debris of the Royal Palm Hotel, revealed by a large quantity of brick observed in the test holes. Three holes with artifacts from earlier 10th century historic activities, possibly from the Seminole War occupation of Ft. Dallas (ca. 1836-1858), were documented. These included glass fragments and ceramic sherds. Artifacts from the Spanish attempts in the 16th and 18th centuries at placing a mission and fort in the area were not uncovered during this assessment. No evidence of human burials was uncovered in parcels B and C, but at least one cemetery are documented in the adjacent areas. The prehistoric sand burial mound, 8DA14, located on the north edge of parcel B, was destroyed by clearing in 1894 prior to the construction of the Royal Palm Hotel. This mound also served as the cemetery for many of the soldiers who died at Ft. Dallas. It is possible that isolated graves or a cemetery area could have existed in parcels B and C, but it is also possible that any graves were destroyed during the construction and the subsequent demolition of the Royal Palm Hotel. 14 02-1249 021 o22 SE 3rd Street 023 024 025 026 27 Toll Booth 016 015 I �_ 020 019 •18 017 W 08 09 010 Oil 012 t� w a e A • 13 014 07 06 05 04 03 02 to Biscayne Boulevard Way or SE 4th Street Figure 4. Map of Miami One Tract C showing Archaeological Material. • Prehistoric Pottery • Pottery and Faunal Bone ❑Historic Artifacts 0 25 50 feet o Faunal Bone • Shell Celt Fragment N OSI 063 062 X 61 046 X 47 048 SE 3rd Street 060 x 59 o58 057 X49 050 051 X52 X56 x 55 x 53 X54 044 043 042 041 040 E]39 X38 x 37 1 28 029 030 031 032 033 034 x 35 X36 Figure 5. Map of Miami One Tract B Archaeological Material. 0 Faunal Bone O C] Historic Artifacts (19th Century) x Auger Role Marked, But Not Dug W t2i 0 25 50 feet LO N c' j7; W t2i SE 3rd Street 021 o22 023 024 025 026 27 ost Toll Booth 020 019 018 017 •16 O •15 y A d A a 08 09 010 •11 012 013 01 07 •6 05 04 03 02 to I Biscayne Boulevard Way or SE 4th Street Figure 6. Map of Miami One Tract C showing Undisturbed Significant Soil Types. • Undisturbed Midden 0 25 50 feet 1 Cn Cr a: <D 00 SE 3rd Street Biscayne Boulevard Figure 7. Map of Miami One Tract B showing Undisturbed Significant Soil Types. • Undisturbed Midden 9 Undisturbed Marine Sediments x Auger Hole Marked, But Not Dug R 0 25 0 feet W 0 R 0 25 0 feet W Profile B -BI (Parcel B) Auger Hole Auger Hole 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 West Sea Level East Possible Sink Hole Auger Hole 7 L, 2 5 Profile C -CI (Parcel Q 4 I Auger Hole Figure 8. Miami One Profiles showing Ground Elevation and Top of Bedrock Bedrock 25 Ist 50 feet lt-!1-o2- Recommendations It is the consultant's opinion that the goal of minimizing and eliminating any delays or work stoppages relative to any archaeological discoveries and subsequent monitoring is best obtained by conducting a proactive archaeological recovery program prior to construction activities. This can be done without the full loss of parking revenues, but some losses will be necessary to affect this plan. This plan requires the use of a backhoe to remove the asphalt -and fill from selected study areas of the parcels, with the goal of uncovering any significant archaeological and historical features that may occur there, and thus allow the archaeological team to record and recover these materials prior to construction activities. This recovery program, ideally, will remove no more than 10 to 20% of the parking lot from active parking at any one time, although smaller areas of at least 50 foot square can be investigated if necessary. The positive aspect of this recovery program is that it provides extensive recordation and mitigation prior to the archaeological monitoring that will be required during initial construction phases, thus minimizing, if not eliminating, any work obstructions, although it should be clear that it will be the consultant's intent that any significant discoveries made during monitoring of construction work will not result in an overall project stoppage, but rather a shifting of the relevant construction task to other parts of the project parcel if the discovery requires recording and/or recovery by the archaeologist. I would recommend that a period of six to eight months be allowed to investigate selected study areas. The negative aspect of this plan is diminished parking revenues. Also, the damage done to the parking surface as a result of this investigation will incur the cost of grading and re -surfacing if the parking use is to continue there after the excavations are completed. It would be ideal to conduct this archaeological recovery plan as early as possible prior to implementation of construction activities. It would enhance public and media perceptions of a willing partnership towards recording the parcel's history as part of the development process. 20 Submitted Irto •z d f 5.�a �3k`✓ Yet., r a2,—,1249 N to SE 3rd Street Biscayne Boulevard Way or SE 4th Street Figure 9. Map of Miami One Tract C Area of Archaeological Sensitivity. • Positive Auger Hole 0 Area of High Probability of Arch. Material 0 25 50 feet o Negative Auger Hole0 Area of Medium Probability of Arch. Matertial N _ . co b N N I� SE 3rd Street Biscayne Boulevard _ Figure 10. Map of Miami One Tract B Area of Archaeological Sensitivity. • Positive Auger Hole Area of High Probabilityfor Arch. Material h 0 25 50 feet` -`. o Negative Test Hole ❑ Area of Medium Probability for Arch. Matieral x Auger Hole Marked, But Not Dug ❑ Area of Low to Medium Probability for Arch. Material y C, o References Cited s _pZ-1J, ._ j1 Beriault, JG, RS Carr, JJ Stipp, R Johnson and J Meeder 1981 The Archaeological Salvage of the Bay West Site, Collier County, Florida The Florida Anthropologist 34 (2):39 - 58. Carbone, VA 1983 Late Quaternary Environments in Florida and, the Southeast. The Florida Anthropologist 36(1-2). Carr, RS 1981a Dade County Historic Final Report: The Archaeological Survey. Metropolitan Dade County Office of Community and Economic Development, Historic Preservation Division Miami, Florida. 1981b Salvage Excavations at Two Prehistoric Cemeteries in Dade County, Florida. Paper presented at the 45th Annual Meeting of the Florida Academy of Sciences. Winter Park. 1981c The Brickell Store and Seminole Indian Trade. The Florida Anthropologist 34(4):180-199. 1986 Preliminary Report of Archaeological Excavations at the Cutler Fossil Site in Southern Florida. Paper presented at the 51 st Annual Meeting of- the Society for American Archaeology. New Orleans. Carr, RS and JG Beriault 1984 Prehistoric Man in Southern Florida In Environments of South Florida, Present and Past. Coral Gables: Miami Geological Society, pp. 1-14 Carr, RS, J Beriault, I Eyster, and M Ammidown 1979 An Archaeological and Historical Survey of the Site 14 Replacement Airport and its Proposed Access Corridors. Dade County, Florida. Carr, RS and M Greene 1961 Field Notes on Excavations at Brickell Point. Notes on file at the Historical Museum of Southern Florida. Carr, RS, JB Ransom, JG Beriault, and M Lance 2002 An Archaeological Assessment of the C-4 Basin Parcel, Miami -Dade County, Florida. AHC Technical Report #368. 23 02=1249 Carr, RS and D SandlerJ,g 1991 Archaeological Investigations at Westridge, Broward County, Florida.C` Technical Report #37. Clausen, CJ, AD Cohen, C Emiliani, JA Holman and J J Stipp 1979 Little Salt Spring, Florida a Unique Underwater Site. Science 203:609-614. Cockrell, WA 1970 Settlement and Subsistence Patterns on Marco Island, Collier County, Florida. Thesis submitted to Department of Anthropology, Florida State University. Delcourt, PA and HR Delcourt 1981 Vegetation Maps for Eastern North America: 40,000 yr. B.P. to the present. In R. C. Romans (ed.) Geobotany H. Plenum Publishing Corp. Douglass, Andrew 1884 Diary on file at the P.K. Yonge Library, University of Florida, Gainesville. Ehrenhard, JE, RS Carr and RC Taylor 1978 The Archaeological Survey of the Big Cypress National Preserve: Phase I. Southeast Archaeological Center, National Park Service, Tallahassee, Florida. 1979 The Archaeological Survey of the Big Cypress National Preserve: Season 2. Southeast Archaeological Center, National Park Service, Tallahassee, Florida. Ehrenhard, JE, RC Taylor, and G Komara 1980 The Archaeological Survey of the Big Cypress National Preserve: Season 4. Southeast Archaeological Center, National Park Service, Tallahassee, Florida. Goggin, JM 1947 A Preliminary Definition of Archaeological Areas and Periods in Florida. American Antiquity 13:114-127. 1949 The Archaeology of the Glades Area. Typescript on file at the Southeast Archaeological Research Center, U.S. National Park Service, Tallahassee,Florida. Griffin, JW 1974 Archaeology and Environment in South Florida. In P. J. Gleason (ed.) Environments of South Florida: Present and Past. Miami Geological Society, Memoir 2, pp. 342- 346. 1988 The Archaeology of Everglades National Park: A Synthesis. National Parks. Services, Southeast Archaeological Center, Tallahassee, Florida. 24 02-1249 Griffin, JW, SB Richardson, M Pohl, CD McMurray, C M Scarry, SK Fish, ES Wing, J Lou(l r,e and MK Welch 1985 Excavations at the Granada Site. Archaeology and History of the Granada Site, vol. 1. Florida Division of Archives, History and Records Management, Tallahassee. Laxson, DD 1959 Three Salvaged Tequesta Sites in Dade County, Florida. The Florida Anthropologist 12(3): 57-64. 1968 The Dupont Plaza Site. The Florida Anthropologist 21(2&3): 55-60. Masson, M, RS Carr, and D Goldman 1988 The Taylor's Head Site (8BD74): Sampling a Prehistoric Midden on an Everglades Tree Island. The Florida Anthropologist 41(3):336-350. Milanich, JT and CH Fairbanks - 1980 Florida Archaeology. New York: Academic Press. Mowers, B and WB Williams 1972 The Peace Camp Site, Broward County, Florida. The Florida Anthropologist 25:1-20. Parks, AM 1983 Excavations at the Granada Site. Volume 3, History. Florida Division of Archives, History and Records Management, Tallahassee. Romans, B 1962 Natural History of Florida. Facsimile of 1775 ed., University Presses of Florida, Gainesville. Scholl, DW and M Stuiver 1967 Recent Submergence of Southern Florida. Geological Society of America Bulletin 78:437-454. Stirling, MW 1936 Florida Cultural Affiliations in Relationship to Adjacent Areas. In Essays in Anthropology in Honor of Alfred Louis Kroeber. Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 351-357. Sturtevant, WC 1953 Chakaika and the `Spanish Indians': Documentary Sources Compared with Seminole Tradition. Tequesta 13:35-73. True, DO 1945 Memoir of Do. d'Escalante Fonteneda Respecting Florida, Written in Spain about the Year 1575. Translated by Buckingham Smith. Glade House, Coral Gables, Florida. 25 02--1249 P2 -1 .' /l.-/7�or Webb, SD and RA Martin 1974 Late Pleistocene Mammals from the Devil's Den Fauna, Levy County. In SD Webb (Ed.) Pleistocene Mammals of Florida. Gainesville: University Presses of Florida, pp. 114-145. Williams, JL 1837 The Territory of Florida. Gainesville: University Press of Florida. 26 02-1249 `.a Appendix 1. Miami One Auger Hole Log t u� a,r. I. West Parking Lot (Parcel C),���t Auger Hole #1 Stratigraphy: 0-10 Asphalt and Crushed Limerock Fill 10-104 Demolition Layer - Black Loam/Grey Sand, Limestone Cobbles, Brick Fragments 104 Bedrock Field Specimen Number: None Auger Hole #2 Stratigraphy: 0- 10 Asphalt and Crushed Limerock Fill 10-23 Demolition Layer - Black Loam/Grey Sand, Limestone Cobbles, Brick Fragments 23-67 Black Loam (possibly undisturbed midden) - 67 Bedrock Field Specimen Number: 1 Auger Hole #3 Stratigraphy: 0-10 Asphalt and Crushed Limerock Fill 20-40 Demolition Layer - Black Loam/Grey Sand, Limestone Cobbles, Brick Fragments 40-80 Sandy Black Loam (possibly undisturbed midden) Field Specimen Number: 2 Auger Hole #4 Stratigraphy: 0- 6Asphalt and Crushed Limerock Fill 6-13 Brick 13-60 Demolition Layer - Black Loam/Grey Sand, Limestone Cobbles, Brick Fragments 60-130 Black Loam (possibly undisturbed midden) Field Specimen Number: 3 Auger Hole #5 Stratigraphy: 0-10 Asphalt and Crushed Limerock Fill 10-25 Redeposited Limerock Fill 25-50 Demolition Layer - Black Loam/Grey Sand, Limestone Cobbles, Brick Fragments 50-158 Black Loam (possibly undisturbed midden) Field Specimen Number: 3 27 02=1249 Appendix 1., cont. Auger Hole #6 Stratigraphy: 0-10 Asphalt and Crushed Limerock Fill 10-30 Redeposited Limerock Fill 30-30 Brick 30-90 Demolition Layer - Black Loam/Grey Sand, Limestone Cobbles, Brick Fragments 90-180 Black Loam (possibly undisturbed midden) Field Specimen Number: 5 Auger Hole #7 Stratigraphy: 0- 18 Asphalt and Crushed Limerock Fill 18-155 Grey Sand Fill Field Specimen Number: 6 Auger Hole #8 Stratigraphy: 0- 16 Asphalt and Crushed Limerock Fill 16-20 Demolition Layer - Black Loam/Grey Sand, Limestone Cobbles, Brick Fragments 20-29 Redeposited Limerock Fill 29-80 Grey Black Loam (possibly undisturbed midden) 80-137 Bedrock Field Specimen Number: 7 Auger Hole #9 Stratigraphy: 0- 10 Asphalt and Crushed Limerock Fill 10-22 Redeposited Limerock Fill with some Midden 22-65 Redeposited Grey/Black Soil, Possibly Midden 65-95 Possible Natural Tan Sand Field Specimen Number: 8 Auger Hole #10 Stratigraphy: 0-14 Asphalt and Crushed Limerock Fill 14-32 Sandy Midden and Fill 32-62 Black Loam (possibly undisturbed midden) 62-78 Orange -Tan Sand (natural) Field Specimen Number: 9 28 02-1249 Appendix 1., cont. Auger Hole #11° @ ClLy Clerk Stratigraphy: 0-14 Asphalt and Crushed Limerock Fill 14-18 Brick Fragments 18-42 Demolition Layer - Black Loam/Grey Sand, Limestone Cobbles, Brick Fragments 42-127 Black Loam (possibly undisturbed midden) with some Orange -Tan Sand (natural) Field Specimen Number: 10 Auger Hole #12 Stratigraphy: 0-14 Asphalt and Crushed Limerock Fill 14-36 Demolition Layer - Black Loam/Grey Sand, Limestone Cobbles, Brick Fragments 36-98 Undisturbed Medium Grey Loam (possible Midden) Field Specimen Number: 11 Auger Hole #13 Stratigraphy: 0-10 Asphalt and Crushed Limerock Fill 10 Brick Fragment 10-30 Demolition Layer - Black Loam/Grey Sand, Limestone Cobbles, Brick Fragments 30-50 Black Loam (possibly undisturbed midden) 50-98 Bedrock Field Specimen Number: 12 Auger Hole #14 (offset 10' west) Stratigraphy: 0740 Asphalt and Crushed Limerock Fill 40-113 Black Loam (Undisturbed Midden) Field Specimen Number: 13 Auger Hole #15 Stratigraphy: 0-11 Asphalt and Crushed Limerock Fill 11-24 Demolition Layer - Black Loam/Grey Sand, Limestone Cobbles, Brick Fragments 24-27 Black Loam (Undisturbed Midden. Bone resting on Bedrock) 27-37 Bedrock Field Specimen Number: 15 29 02-12'49 Appendix 1., cont. Auger Hole #16 Stratigraphy: 0-14 Asphalt and Crushed Limerock Fill 14-33 Black Loam (Undisturbed Midden) 33-60 Bedrock Field Specimen Number: 14 Auger Hole #17 Stratigraphy: 0-15 Asphalt and Crushed Limerock Fill 15-28 Demolition Layer - Black Loam/Grey Sand, Limestone Cobbles, Brick Fragments 28-77 Bedrock Field Specimen Number: None Auger Hole #18 Stratigraphy: 0-14 Asphalt and Crushed Limerock Fill 14-30 Demolition Layer - Black Loam/Grey Sand, Limestone Cobbles, Brick Fragments 30-34 Orange -Tan Sand (natural) 34-75 Bedrock Field Specimen Number: 16 Auger Hole #19 Stratigraphy: 0- 12Asphalt and Crushed Limerock Fill 12-36 Demolition Layer - Black Loam/Grey Sand, Limestone Cobbles, Brick Fragments 36-40 Orange -Tan Sand (natural) 40-60 Bedrock Field Specimen Number: 17 Auger Hole #20 Stratigraphy: 0-15 Asphalt and Crushed Limerock Fill 15-26 Brick 26-66 Demolition Layer - Black Loam/Grey Sand, Limestone Cobbles, Brick Fragments 66-88 Bedrock Field Specimen Number: 18 30 02-1240 Appendix 1., cont. Auger Hole #21 Stratigraphy: 0-13 Asphalt and Crushed Limerock Fill 13-20 Grey Loam 20-22 Tan Sand 2-80 Bedrock Field Specimen Number: None Auger Hole #22 Stratigraphy: 0-12 Asphalt and Crushed Limerock Fill 12 Brick Fragment 12-24 Grey Loam 24-64 Bedrock Field Specimen Number: None Auger Hole #23 Stratigraphy: 0- 14 Asphalt and Crushed Limerock Fill 14-18 Redeposited Limerock Fill 18-58 Bedrock Field Specimen Number: None Auger Hole #24 Stratigraphy: 0- 11 Asphalt and Crushed Limerock Fill 11-17 Demolition Layer - Black Loam/Grey Sand, Limestone Cobbles, Brick Fragments 17-80 Bedrock Field Specimen Number: None Auger Hole #25 Stratigraphy: 0-12 Asphalt and Crushed Limerock Fill 12-22 Light Grey Silt (redeposited) 22-55 Bedrock Field Specimen Number: None Auger Hole #26 Stratigraphy: 0-11 Asphalt and Crushed Limerock Fill 11-30 Grey Marl Fill 30-44 Grey Loam (redeposited) Field Specimen Number: None, but brick noted. 31 02-124P Appendix 1., cont. Auger Hole #27 Stratigraphy: 0- 10 Asphalt and Crushed Limerock Fill 10-30 Grey Marl Fill (redeposited) 30-45 Bedrock Field Specimen Number: 19 H. East Parking Lot (Parcel B) Auger Hole #28 Stratigraphy: 0- 20 Asphalt and Crushed Limerock Fill 20-70 Medium Gray Loam (Natural?) 70-80 Bedrock Field Specimen Number: 20 Auger Hole #29 Stratigraphy: 0- 25 Asphalt and Crushed Limerock Fill 25-120 Black Loam (Undisturbed Midden) Field Specimen Number: 21 Auger Hole #30 Stratigraphy: 0-25 Asphalt and Crushed Limerock Fill 25-104 Black Loam (Undisturbed Midden) 104-140 Bedrock Field Specimen Number: 22 Auger Hole #31 Stratigraphy: 0- 25 Asphalt and Crushed Limerock Fill 25-40 Medium Grey Sandy Silt (pd) 40-75 Bedrock Field Specimen Number: 23 Auger Hole #32 Stratigraphy: 0-32 Asphalt and Crushed Limerock Fill 32-80 Medium Grey -Brown Loam (Disturbed) 80-145 Medium Tan Sand (wet) 145-150 Bedrock 32 its �li�Giii� City Clerk Field Specimen Number: 24 02-1249 Appendix 1., cont. Si/b 9Bk item PZ -11 . o<n 11.-1_I_-oY Priscilla A. Auger Hole #33 City Clerk Stratigraphy: 0- 15 Asphalt and Crushed Limerock Fill 15-40 Tan Sand/ Shell Hash (redeposited) 40-210 Marine Clay (Dark Gray to Black Clay) - Charcoal, Pine and Plant Material Preserved Water Table = 120 cm Field Specimen Number: 25,25A Auger Hole #34 Stratigraphy: 0-25 Asphalt and Crushed Limerock Fill 25-55 Demolition Layer - Black Loam/Grey Sand, Limestone Cobbles, Brick Fragments 55-65 Grey to Tan Sand 65-160 Tan Sand (natural) 160-300 Marine Clay. (Dark Gray to Black Clay) Field Specimen Number: 26 Auger Hole #39 Stratigraphy: 0- 18 Asphalt and Crushed Limerock Fill 18-55 Demolition Layer - Black Loam/Grey Sand, Limestone Cobbles, Brick Fragments 55-66 Concrete Slab 66-150 Red Shell Hash - Dredge Material 150-300 Marine Clay (Dark Gray to Black Clay) Field Specimen Number: 27 Auger Hole #40 Stratigraphy: 0-18 Asphalt and Crushed Limerock Fill 18-68 Demolition Layer - Black Loam/Grey Sand, Limestone Cobbles, Brick Fragments 68-93 Rock Fill or Large Boulder 93-300 Marine Clay (Dark Gray to Black Clay) Field Specimen Number: 28 Auger Hole #41 Stratigraphy: 0- 18 Asphalt and Crushed Limerock Fill 18-75 Demolition Layer - Black Loam/Grey Sand, Limestone Cobbles, Brick Fragments 75-100 Bedrock Field Specimen Number: 29 33 02- 1249 Appendix 1., cont. Auger Hole #42 r s 1 5 Stratigraphy: City Clerk 0-15 Asphalt and Crushed Limerock Fill 15-100 Demolition Layer - Black Loam/Grey Sand, Limestone Cobbles, Brick Fragments 100-180 Tan Sand (natural) 180-195 Bedrock Field Specimen Number: 30 Auger Hole #43 Stratigraphy: 0-15 Asphalt and Crushed Limerock Fill 15-70 Demolition Layer - Black Loam/Grey Sand, Limestone Cobbles, Brick Fragments 70-125 Grey Sand fading into Tan Sand (natural) 125 Bedrock Field Specimen Number: 31 Auger Hole #44 Stratigraphy: 0-25 Asphalt and Crushed Limerock Fill 25-80 Demolition Layer - Black Loam/Grey Sand, Limestone Cobbles, Brick Fragments 80-130 Orange -Tan Sand (natural) 130-138 Bedrock Field Specimen Number: 32 Auger Hole #45 Stratigraphy: 0-14 Asphalt and Crushed Limerock Fill 14-60 Demolition Layer - Black Loam/Grey Sand, Limestone Cobbles, Brick Fragments 60-75 Black Loam (possibly undisturbed midden) 75 Bedrock Field Specimen Number: 33 Auger Hole #46 Stratigraphy: 0-16 Asphalt and Crushed Limerock Fill 16-40 Demolition Layer - Black Loam/Grey Sand, Limestone Cobbles, Brick Fragments 40-60 Black Loam (Undisturbed Midden) 60-62 Bedrock Field Specimen Number: None, some brick noted. 34 02--'120 Appendix 1., cont.the Public i Auger Hole #48� r, Stratigraphy: 0-18 Asphalt and Crushed Limerock Fill 18-45 Demolition Layer - Black Loam/Grey Sand, Limestone Cobbles, Brick Fragments 45-55 Dark Grey Sand 55-90 Light Tan Sand (natural) 90 Bedrock Field Specimen Number: 34 Auger Hole #50 Stratigraphy: 0-15 Asphalt and Crushed Limerock Fill 15-140? Demolition Layer - Black Loam/Grey Sand, Limestone Cobbles, Brick Fragments 140? -180? Orange -Tan Sand (natural) - 180? -240 Grey Marl 240 Bedrock Water Table = 150 cm Field Specimen Number: 35 Auger Hole #51 Stratigraphy: 0-15 Asphalt and Crushed Limerock Fill 15-55 Demolition Layer - Black Loam/Grey Sand, Limestone Cobbles, Brick Fragments 55-255 Bedrock Water table = 135 cm Field Specimen Number: None Auger Hole #58 Stratigraphy: 0- 23 Asphalt and Crushed Limerock Fill 23-58 Demolition Layer - Black Loam/Grey Sand, Limestone Cobbles, Brick Fragments 58-91 Black Loam - many Fe Nails observed in 91-225 Light Tan Sand (natural) 225-300 Bedrock Field Specimen Number: 36 Auger Hole #57 Stratigraphy: 0- 24 Asphalt and Crushed Limerock Fill 24-80 Demolition Layer - Black Loam/Grey Sand, Limestone Cobbles, Brick Fragments 80-300 Bedrock Water Table = 128cm Field Specimen Number: 37 35 02--1249 Appendix 1., cont. item pl-//.,.4 Prisciiia A- T � Auger Hole #60 City Clerk Stratigraphy: 0-21 Asphalt and Crushed Limerock Fill 21-41 Demolition Layer - Black Loam/Grey Sand, Limestone Cobbles, Brick Fragments 41-56 Medium Grey Loam (natural) 56-120 Bedrock Field Specimen Number: None Auger Hole #62 Stratigraphy: 0- 17 Asphalt and Crushed Limerock Fill 17-40 Demolition Layer - Black Loam/Grey Sand, Limestone Cobbles, Brick Fragments 40-60 Orange -Tan Sand (natural) 60-130 Bedrock Field Specimen Number: 38 Auger Hole #63 Stratigraphy.- 0-15 tratigraphy:0-15 Asphalt and Crushed Limerock Fill 15-46 Demolition Layer - Black Loam/Grey Sand, Limestone Cobbles, Brick Fragments 46-75 Bedrock Field Specimen Number: None in 02-1249 y 1 s I� rii Appendix 2. Miami One FS Log FS jProvenience Contents Collector Date 1 Test Hole 2 St. Johns Plain Ceramics (4), Faunal VL,SF 7/13/02 Bone (n=4,1.5g), Marine Shell (Lucine,Conch) (15.3g), Brick Fragments (6), Unmodified Limestone 2 Test Hole 3 Sand Tempered Plain Ceramics (1), VL,SF 7/13/02 Marine Shell (Lucine)(2.4g), Brick Fragments (9), Wire Nail Fragment 3 Test Hole 4 Marine Shell (Lucine, Conch, ?) (7.8g), VL,SF 7/13/02 Possibly Cut Iron Nail, Flat Glass Fragments, Brick Fragments, Modern Building Material, Concrete Fragment - 4 Test Hole 5 Marine Shell (Lucine, Oyster, UID VL,SF 7/13/02 Fossil Shell) (5.9g), Brick Fragments (7), Iron Hook, Wire Nail, Early 20th Century Wiiteware (1), Concrete Fragments 5 Test Hole 6 Marine Shell (Lucine) (4.5g), 19th VL,SF 7/13/02 Century Dark Green Glass Bottle Fragment, Faunal Bone (n=1,1.6g) 6 Test Hole 7 Ceramic Sewer Pipe Fragment, Brick VL,SF 7/13/02 Fragment, Marine Shell (Lucine, UID Fossil Shell) (5.3g), Light Green Glass Fragment, Clear Glass Bottle Base Fragment, Modem Building Material, Unmodified Limestone 7 Test Hole 8 Marine Shell (Conch) (10.7g), Brick VL,SF 7/13/02 Fragments (2), Windowpane Glass Fragments, Concrete Fragment, Modem Building Material 8 Test Hole 9 Brick Fragment, Marine Shell (Conch) VL,SF,ML 7/13/02 (2.3g), Modern Clear Molded Glass Fragment (Related to Building Construction) 9 Test Hole 10 Marine Shell (Busycon) (74.8g), Brick VL,SF,ML 7/13/02 Fragment, Clear Modem Glass Bottle Fragment, Modem Building Material 37 02-1249 St' Appendix 2., cont. FS Provenience Contents iCollector Date 10 Test Hole 11 Shell Celt Fragments (n=3,22.0g), VL,SF,ML, BC 7/13/02 Marine Shell (0.9g), Faunal Bone (n=1,0.2g), Brick Fragments (3), Possibly Cut Iron Nail, Windowpane Glass Fragment, Unidentified Modem Material 11 Test Hole 12 Faunal Bone (n=6,2.0g), Marine Shell VL,SF,ML, BC 7/13/02 (Lucine, ?) (2.1g), Brick Fragments, Clear Flat Glass Fragment, Early 20th Century Amber Glass Bottle Fragment, Modem Building Material 12 Test Hole 13 Marine Shell (Lucine) (0.8g), 19th VL,SF,ML, BC 7/13/02 Century Ironstone Ceramic Fragments (2), Cut Nail, Faunal Bone (n=1,0.3g), Brick Fragments (2), Modem Building - Material 13 Test Hole 14 Sand Tempered Plain Ceramic (2), VL,SF,ML, BC 7/13/02 Marine Shell (Lucine, ?)(3.6g), Faunal Bone (n=13,10.7g), Brick Fragments (3), Modem Building Material 14 Test Hole 16 Marine Shell (Lucine, ?) (0.4g), VL,SF,ML, BC 7/13/02 Unidentified Iron Fragment, Unmodified Limestone 15 Test Hole 15 Marine Shell (Oyster, Conch) (2.3g), VL,SF,ML, BC 7/13/02 Faunal Bone (n=1,0.1g), Metal Wire 16 Test Hole 18 Marine Shell (Lucine, Conch) (2.5g), VL,SF,ML, BC 7/13/02 Cut Nail, Unmodified Limestone 17 Test Hole 19 Marine Shell (11.3g), Modem Clear VL,SF,ML, BC 7/13/02 Glass Bottle Fragment, Brick Fragment, Concrete Fragment 18 Test Hole 20 Sand Tempered Plain Ceramics (2), VL,SF,ML, BC 7/13/02 Brick Fragments (2), Marine Shell (Lucine, Conch) (6.3g), Faunal Bone (n=1,0.68), Coal Fragments (?), Modem Building Material 19 Test Hole 27 Brick Fragments (3) VL,SF,ML, BC 7/13/02 20 Test Hole 28 Marine Shell (Oyster, Lucine, ?) (6.4g), VL,SF,ML, BC 7/13/02 Faunal Bone (n=1,<0.1g), Modern Building Material I: 02-1249 FS Provenience Contents Collector Date 21 Test Hole 29 Marine Shell (Lucine, Oyster) (25.1g), VL,SF,ML, BC 7/13/02 Busycon Columella Adze Tip, Faunal Bone (n=1,1.58), Cut Nail, Wood Fragments (0.1g), Modem Building Material 22 Test Hole 30 Marine Shell (Lucine, ?) (6.4g), Faunal VL,SF,ML, BC 7/13/02 Bone (n=3,0.78); Windowpane Glass Fragment, Brick Fragments (2), Cut Nail, Ceramic Paste Fragment, Historic Slag/Coke Fragments 23 Test Hole 31 Marine Shell (Lucine) (0.6g), VL,SF,ML, BC 7/13/02 Unmodified Lithic, Concrete Fragments 24 Test Hole 32 Marine Shell (Lucine, UID Fossil ShelfVL,SF,ML, BC 7/13/02 (9.1g), Brick Fragments (5), Light Amber Modem Glass Bottle Fragment, Concrete Fragments, Wood and Bark Fragments (3.0g) 25 Test Hole 33 Marine Shell (Oyster, Scallop, Lucine) VL,SF,ML, BC 7/13/02 (30.7g), Modified Wood, Historic Slag/Coke Fragments, Charcoal, Clear Glass Bottle Fragment (?), Modem Building Material 26 Test Hole 34 Marine Shell (Lucina, UID Gastropod, VL,SF,ML, BC 7/13/02 UID Fossil Shell) (17.6g), Brick Fragment, Opaque 20th Century Possible Windowpane Glass 27 Test Hole 39 Carbon (0.1g), Wood Fragments VL,SF,ML, BC 7/13/02 (0.7g), Marine Shell (Lucine) (27.48), Windowpane Glass Fragment, 'Light Amber Modem Glass Bottle Fragment, Light Blue 19th Century Glass Bottle Fragment w/Patination, Historic Coke/Slag Fragment, Modem Building Material, Brick Fragment, Wire Nail, Iron Pipe Fragment (discarded) 28 Test Hole 40 Marine Shell (Lucine) (12.2g), Wood VL,SF,ML, BC 7/13/02 and Bark Fragments (2.8g), Brick Fragments (5), Light Aqua c.1910 Glass Bottle Fragment, Amber Modem Glass Bottle Fragments, Concrete Fragments 39 02-1249 Appendix 2., cont. Submitted !r!'o "'0 public rcccrd K N "`3 3 i.,A Ar9 FS Provenience Contents Collector 29 Test Hole 41 Faunal Bone (Lucine) (n=1,0.1g), VL,SF,ML, BC 7/13/02 Marine Shell (0.2g), Coal Fragment, Concrete Fragments, Unmodified Limestone Fragments, Brick Fragment, Unidentified Metal Fragments, Modern Building Material 30 Test Hole 42 Marine Shell (Conch) (14.7g), Wire VL,SF,ML, BC 7/13/02 Nail, Faunal Bone (n=2,0.2g), Windowpane Glass Fragments, Brick Fragments (3), Coal Fragments, Concrete Fragments 31 Test Hole 43 Marine Shell (Lucine, Conch, Busycon) VL,SF,ML, BC 7/13/02 (29.6g), Coal Fragments, Brick Fragment, Earthenware Ceramic Fragment, Possibly a Flower Pot Fragment (1), Concrete Fragments, Unidentified Building Material 32 Test Hole 44 Marine Shell (Busycon?) (0.9g), Brick VL,SF,ML, BC /13/02 Fragment, Coke Fragments, Carbon (1.7g) 33 Test Hole 45 Marine Shell (Lucine, Conch) (13.88), VL,SF,ML, BC 7/13/02 Faunal Bone (n=1,0.5g), Brick Fragment, Windowpane Glass Fragment, 19th Century Peariware Ceramic Sherd w/Light Green Sponge Design, Unidentified Modem Material 34 Test Hole 48 Clear Modem Glass Bottle Fragments, VL,SF,ML, BC 7/13/02 Brick Fragment 35 Test Hole 50 Marine Shell (Lucine) (0.4g), Cut Nail, VL,SF,ML, BC 7/13/02 Unidentified Iron Material, Modem Building Material, Brick Fragments (4), Unmodified Limestone, 20th Century Amber Glass Bottle Fragment 36 Test Hole 58 Marine Shell (Busycon, Lucine, Oyster) VL,SF,ML, BC 7/13/02 (18.3g), Cut Nails, Unidentified Iron Fragment, Unidentified Modern Material 37 Test Hole 57 Marine Shell (0.3g), Brick Fragment, VL,SF,ML, BC 7/13/02 Concrete Fragments 40 02-19-49 Appendix 2., Cont. est Hole 62 ---FCut -Nails 41 ,ML, BC 17/4-3/02 S u b m i t t e d w n t o, rix p i J record in item -E2 ci�-4 p ri s 'a'� JfA. 02-1249 Appendix 3. Archaeological Investigations/Monitoring Projects in Downtown Miami and Vicinity and Their Impacts on Development p2-1249 Significant Effect on Archaeological Human Development Project Name Materials Found Burials Schedule A-1 Parking Lot Yes No None Atlantis. Yes Yes None Brickell Bridge Widening Yes No None Brickell Park* Yes Yes Yes Brickell Towers Yes No Yes Bristol Tower No No - None City of Miami -Jose Marti Park Yes Yes None Coscan Yes No None Dupont Plaza. Yes No None Four Seasons Hotel Yes No None Hyatt Center Yes Yes None Hyatt Swimming Pool Yes No None Imperial Condominiums Yes No None Miami Arena No No None Miami -Dade Community College No No None Parking Garage People Mover Construction Yes No None Santa Maria Yes Yes None Sheraton Hotel Yes No None Southeast Bank Building No No None Tommy's Boat Yard- Yes No None Environmental Cleanup * Property was removed from sale by City of Miami 42 p2-1249 APPLICANT HEARING DATE REQUEST/LOCATION LEGAL DESCRIPTION ITEM PZ 11 FIRST READING PLANNING FACT SHEET Gilberto Pastoriza, Esquire, on behalf of Ricardo Glas as Trustee. October 16, 2002 Approximately 300 SE 3`d Street, 200 SE 3rd Street and 200 SE 2nd Street. Complete legal description on file with the Hearing Boards Office. PETITION Consideration of a Resolution, with attachments, approving with conditions, a Major Use Special Permit pursuant to Articles 13, 17 and 22 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, for the One Miami Project, to be located at approximately 300 SE 3rd Street, 200 SE P Street and 200 SE 2"d Street. Miami, Florida, to be comprised of a residential complex, with not more than 1,500 residential units with accessory recreational space, 9,000 square feet of office uses, approximately 218,500 square feet of retail uses and approximately 4,284 parking spaces. PLANNING RECOMMENDATION Recommended approval with conditions. BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS See supporting documentation. PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD Recommended approval with VOTE: 7-0 conditions to City Commission. CITY COMMISSION N/A. APPLICATION NUMBER 2002-069 Item #12 CITY OF MIAMI • PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT 444 SW 2ND AVENUE, 3RD FLOOR • MIAMI, FLORIDA, 33130 PHONE (305) 416-1400 Date: 11/8/2002 Page 1 92-1249 Analysis for Major Use Special Permit for the One Miami Parcels B, C and D Project CASE NO. 2002-0069 Pursuant to Ordinance 11000, as amended, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, the subject proposal for the One Miami Parcels B, C and D Project has been reviewed to allow a Substantial Modification of a previously approved Major Use Special Permit. This Permit also includes the following requests: CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Section 915.2 for FAA clearance letter. CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 925.3.8, to allow develop- ment/construction/rental signage CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 918.2 for parking and staging of construction during construction. CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 920. 1, to allow a trailer and watchman's quarters for construction and other temporary office uses such as leasing and sales. CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 922.4(c) to allow maneuvering of trucks on public rights of way. CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 906.6, for pool/outdoor recreation area. CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 917.1.2 to allow valet parking for residential and other uses. CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 906.9 to allow for a special event namely a ground breaking ceremony. CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 4, Section 401 to allow for bars, saloons, tav- erns and/or supper clubs. CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 4, Section 401 to allow for child day care fa- cilities CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 917. 1.1 to allow backing into a street. 02-1249 -J' CLASS Il SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 4, Section 401, for development of new con- struction within the Central Business District. CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 908.2 for access from a public street roadway width greater than 25 feet. CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 4, Section 401 to approve open space and/or residential recreation space as shown on the plans. CLASS 1I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 4, Section 401 to allow for wholesale activi- ties at the ground floor level along designated primary pedestrian pathways so long as ground floor frontage consists of a retail or open to the public component. CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 4, Section 401 to allow for parking garages. CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 4, Section 401 to allow for outdoor eating areas, outdoor cafes, outdoor display and sale of food or live flowers and plants. CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 922.8 to allow for combined off- street loading facilities. CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 903.1 to allow development of a project divided by a street. CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT, as per Article 4, Section 401, for a temporary construction fence and covered walkway within the Central Business District. MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT, per Article 17, Section 1701, and Article 22 of City of Miami Zoning Ordinance 11000, as amended, to allow a change in the original applica- tion (substantial modification for previously approved resolution # C C 98-1151) from 383,000 square feet (as modified by resolution # C C 02-858) of nonresidential floor area to approximately 227,625 square feet; MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT, per Article 17, Section 1701, and Article 22 of City of Miami Zoning Ordinance 11000, as amended, to allow a change in the original applica- tion (substantial modification for previously approved resolution # C C 98-1151) from parking structures consisting of 5815 spaces (as modified by resolution # C C 02-858) to approximately 4,284 spaces; MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT, per Article 17, Section 1701, and Article 22 of City of Miami Zoning Ordinance 11000, as amended, to allow a change in the original applica- tion (substantial modification for previously approved resolution # C C 98-1151) to con- vert 250,000 square feet of office use to residential use using the same coefficient as those in Increment I of the Downtown Miami Development of Regional Impact. o2-1249 (250,000) x (.0044) = 1,100 units Prior to above conversion, 1,172,000 square feet (resolution # C C 98-1151 as modified by resolution # C C 02-858) of office was available. After the conversion 1,022,000 square feet is still available. Prior to above conversion, 600 residential units (resolution # C C 98-1151 as modified by resolution # C C 02-858) were available. After above con- version, 1,700 units are now available. Fifteen hundred (1,500) units are approved. Per CITY CODE, Chapter 36, Construction Equipment Request for waiver of noise ordinance while under construction for continuous pours. Per CITY CODE, Section 55-14 to have City Commission approve the pedestrian bridges across SE 3rd Avenue. Per CITY CODE, Chapter 4, designation of the entertainment retail center located at the NE corner of SE 3rd Avenue and SE 4th Street as retail specialty center as that term is defined in Section 4-2. Per CITY CODE, Chapter 23-5(a), Request for a Certificate of Appropriateness for ground disturbing activity in an Archaeological Conservation Area. Designation as a phased project, pursuant to Section 2502 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, as amended (approved by Reso. No. 98-1151) from parcel a, b, c, d to east half of d first, then b and c, then west half of d. REQUEST that the following MUSP conditions be required at the time of Temporary Certificate of Occupancy or Final Certificate of Occupancy instead of at issuance of foundation permit: b. the requirement to record in the Public Records a Declaration of Cove- nants and Restrictions providing that the ownership, operation and maintenance of all common areas and facilities will be by the property owner or a mandatory property owner association; and C. the requirement to record in the Public Records a unity of title or covenant in lieu of unity of title. Pursuant to Articles 13 and 17 of Zoning Ordinance 11000, approval of the requested Major Use Special Permit shall be considered sufficient for the subordinate permits requested and referenced above as well as any other special approvals required by the City which may be required to carry out the requested plans. 02-1249 The requested Special Permit is for the purpose of allowing a phased mixed-use devel- opment project to consist of a mixed use residential/commercial development on three City blocks, with no more than 1,500 residential units with accessory recreational space, approximately 218,625 square feet of retail/entertainment uses and approximately 9,000 square feet of office uses. The PROJECT will also provide approximately 4,284 parking spaces. In determining the appropriateness of the proposed project, the Planning and Zoning Department has referred this project to the Large Scale Development Committee (LSDC) and the Urban Development Review Board (UDRB) for additional input and recommendations; the following findings have been made: It is found that the proposed mixed-use/residential development project will benefit the Downtown area, and more particularly the Central Business District, by creating new housing opportunities on the north side of the Miami River within downtown. It is found that the subject property has convenient access to the Central Business District, the Miami River, Biscayne Bay, Bayfront Park and the People Mover system that makes it ideally suited for residential and retail as a mixed use to serve the area. • It is found that the project was reviewed by the Large Scale Development Committee and has been modified to address the expressed technical concerns raised at said Large Scale Development. Committee meeting; however, additional design details related to sidewalk and swale area and Bay and River walk improvements will have to be submitted at the time of permitting. • It is found that the proposed project was reviewed for design appropriateness by the Urban Development Review Board and the Planning and Zoning Department; the staff review resulted in design modifications which were then recommended for approval to the Planning and Zoning Director with -additional conditions as listed in the Development Order. • It is found that the proposed pedestrian bridges are not consistent with the Downtown Master Plan and the Comprehensive Plan as they relate to promoting pedestrian activity in the Central Business District and should be eliminated from the project. • It is found that with respect to all additional criteria as specified in Section 1305 of Zoning Ordinance 11000, the proposal has been reviewed and found to be adequate. Based on these findings, the Planning and Zoning Department is recommending approval of the requested Development Project with the following conditions: 62-1ti49 Meet all applicable building codes, land development regulations, ordinances and other laws. 2. Pay all applicable fees due prior to the issuance of a building permit. 3. Allow the Miami Police Department to conduct a security survey, at the option of the Department, and to make recommendations concerning security measures and systems; further submit a report to the Department of Planning and Zoning, prior to commencement of construction, demonstrating how the Police Department rec- ommendations, if any, have been incorporated into the Project security and con- struction plans, or demonstrate to the Director of the Department of Planning and Zoning why such recommendations are impractical. 4. Obtain approval from, or provide a letter from the Department of Fire -Rescue in- dicating Applicant's coordination with members of the Fire Plan Review Section at the Department of Fire -Rescue in the review of the scope of the Project, owner responsibility, building development process and review procedures, as well as specific requirements for fire projection and life safety systems, exiting, vehicular access and water supply. 5. Obtain approval from, or provide a letter of assurance from the Department of Solid Waste that the Project has addressed all concerns of the said Department prior to the obtainment of a shell permit. 6. Prepare a Minority Participation and Employment Plan (including a Contrac- tor/Subcontractor Participation Plan) to be submitted to the City's Director of Equal Employment Opportunity for review and comments, with the understanding that the Applicant must use its best efforts to follow the provisions of the City's Minority/Women Business Affairs and Procurement Program as a guide. 7. Record the following in the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, prior to the issuance of a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy or Certificate of Occupancy, a Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions providing that the ownership, operation and maintenance of all common areas and facilities will be by the property owner or a mandatory property owner association in perpetuity. 8. Prior to the issuance of a shell permit, demonstrate to the City that the condomin- ium documents have been filed with the State of Florida; or (b) provide the City with an executed, recordable unity of title or covenant in -lieu of unity of title agreement for the subject property, said agreement shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Attorney's Office. 9. Provide the Department of Public Works with plans for proposed sidewalk and swale area improvements (including implementation of the Burle Marx Plan for 02_j249 Biscayne Boulevard) for its review and approval prior to the issuance of a build- ing permit. 10. Provide the Department of Planning and Zoning with a temporary parking plan, including an operational plan, which addresses construction employee parking during the construction period, said plan shall include an enforcement plan and shall be subject to the review and approval by the Department of Planning and Zoning prior to the issuance of any building permits and shall be enforced during construction activity. 11. Pursuant to the Departments of Fire -Rescue and General Services Administration, the roof area of the proposed structures shall be made available to the City of Mi- ami for any necessary communications equipment at no charge to the City. 12. If the project is to be developed in phases, the Applicant shall submit an interim plan, including a landscape plan, which addresses design details for the land oc- cupying future phases of this Project in the event that the future phases are not de- veloped, said plan shall include a proposed timetable and shall be subject to re- view and approval by the Director of the Department of Planning and Zoning. 13. The Applicant shall keep the Miami -Dade County archeologist apprised of all ground disturbing activity; based upon his findings; some level of monitoring by a private archeological consultant may be required. 14. Within 90 days of the effective date of this Development Order, record a certified copy of the Development Order specifying that the Development Order runs with the land and is binding on the Applicant, its successors, and assigns, jointly or severally. 15. Given the significance of the subject properties in the heart of the downtown area, the Applicant shall provide for decorative construction fencing while the project is being built; design of such fencing shall be subject to review and approval by the Director of Planning and Zoning. 16. The Applicant shall continue to work with the Planning and Zoning Department to address design issues related to the building rooftops in order to address concerns associated with the final building elevations and consistency of architectural ele- ments. 17. The Applicant shall eliminate the pedestrian bridges proposed over public right- of-ways; such bridges are not consistent with the Downtown Master Plan or the Miami Comprehensive Plan as they relate to promoting pedestrian activity in the Central Business District. 1 ,. - �a �a�� � ..•�a s p� Ps, x eN 'r. [ " `. �R.. � .. $ d � ib $� 3� ) # '$"'�I"" • ,w, ,� �.* a i xtw- �* �a"tt � .•�.�'-�'��`'s��r��i h``°ac� re�ryc "rte % � *. .x•�� 4 � " �� � `'* � sr%'. � '� �� �� 2 .. ��4'°�..: � ��k �RAxo- � �� :'� M BISCAYNE BLVD MI k Y C I T Y O F M 'I A M I P L A N N I N G A N D Z O N I N G D E P A R T M E N T URBAN DEVELOPMENT R E V I E w BOARD RES0LiJTION: UD RB 8-27-02-1 A resolution recommending denial of a Major Use Special Permit for- One Miami located in Downtown Miami. Meeting Date: August 27, 2002 ItemNo.: 1 Vote: 3-2 Project denied due to concern over potential traffic congestion in the area, not based on how the project meets the public realm. Specifically a concern over how the traffic along 2nd street and 2nd avenue will be resolved and generally, a concern over the timing of the transportation master plan that addresses the traffic study to open a two- way traffic pattern in the downtown area and the construction of the project. r/'Alox I UT yrm 1,64 " . a.1* . 02-149 RESOLUTION PAB - 70-02 A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION, WITH ATTACHMENTS, APPROVING WITH CONDITIONS, A SUBSTANTIAL MODIFICATION TO A MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT PURSUANT TO ARTICLES 13,17 AND 22 OF ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 11000, FOR THE ONE MIAMI PROJECT, TO BE LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY 300 SOUTHEAST 3RD STREET, 200 SOUTHEAST 3RD STREET AND 200 SOUTHEAST 2ND STREET, TO BE COMPRISED OF A RESIDENTIAL COMPLEX, WITH NOT MORE THAN 1,500 RESIDENTIAL UNITS WITH ACCESSORY RECREATIONAL SPACE, 9,000 SQUARE FEET OF OFFICE USES, APPROXIMATELY 218,500 SQUARE FEET OF RETAIL USES AND APPROXIMATELY 4,284 PARKING SPACES. HEARING DATE: October 16, 2002 ITEM NO.: 12 VOTE: 7-0 ATTES6;`— na Gelabert-Sanchez, Di ctor Planning and Zoning Department 02-1249 � 1 i INTRODUCTION The proposed development consists of a total of three parcels, two of which are located along S.E. 4'" Street between S.E.V Avenue and Biscayne Boulevard and one parcel located on S.E.V Avenue between. S.E. 20d and 3rd Avenues (the "Property"). The Property falls within the Downtown Miami Development of Regional Impact (the "DRI"). The Property is designated CBD Commercial Business District in the City of Miami Future Land Use Map (the "Map") and the Official Zoning Atlas (the "Atlas"). The proposed development is permitted by the DRI and is consistent with the Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan and is a permitted use of the CBD zoning district. The Property was originally part of the already permitted One Miami Major Use Special Permit (the "Original MUSP"), approved under Resolution No. 98-1151 (the "Resolution"). The Resolution approved 1,500 dwelling units, 1,200,000 square feet of office development, 400,000 square feet of retail development, and 7,000 parking spaces. A portion of the Original MUSP was bifurcated and recently received approval for a Substantial Modification to the Original MUSP under Resolution No. 02-858, which permits development of 900 dwelling units, 28,000 square feet of office, and 17,000 square feet of retail development. The applicant intends to develop the Property as a mixed-use residential and commercial development which will create a new pedestrian -friendly, downtown neighborhood that provides housing, retail, entertainment, and fitness amenities to the project's residents, downtown area workers, tourists staying in the vicinity, and residents of the nearby Brickell area. To achieve this end, the project consists of 1,500 dwelling units in three towers, a four- story entertainment complex with a 16 -screen movie theatre, approximately 157,325 square. feet of additional multilevel retail within the four buildings, a 9,000 square foot office component, and 4,284 parking spaces to accommodate all proposed uses as well as to replace the ground -level spaces currently on the vacant Property. This proposed development will have a significantly lesser impact than the Original MUSP. The project incorporates innovative urban design techniques to emphasize the neighborhood character of the development. These include extra wide sidewalks, lush greenery along all streets, sidewalk courtyards, and covered loggias. _Providing a central meeting place for pedestrians, a large open-air plaza adjacent to the entertainment complex will afford connectivity and integration with the existing First Union Bank plaza. Specifically for the use and enjoyment of residents, rooftop recreation areas complete with state-of-the-art infinity edge pools and extensive landscaping will provide a peaceful setting high atop the busy urban setting below. - 02-1249 Similarly, imaginative design has been used to buffer the infrastructure of the buildings from public view. To wit, the facades of all parking levels are designed to resemble habitable space, thereby shielding them from motorists and occupants of adjacent buildings. Furthermore, loft style apartments and condominiums situated on parking levels will provide increased buffering of garages along S.E. 0 Street, Biscayne Boulevard, and a portion of S.E. 2' Avenue. All loading spaces have been located internally to the site and an underground tunnel will service.the entertainment complex so as to avoid aesthetic detraction and traffic disruption. Lastly, distinctive architectural elements on the rooftops of the residential towers have been designed both to identify the project as a skyline landmark and ingeniously shield all rooftop -mechanical equipment from view. Once completed, the proposed development will be a significant. asset to the City of Miami that will transform the perception of downtown from merely a place where people work to a place where people live and play as well. 1 PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT HEARING BOARDS DIVISION 444 SW 2nd Avenue, 711 Floor • Miami, Florida 33130 Telephone 305-416-1480 • Fax 305-416-2035 APPLICATION FOR MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT IT IS INTENDED THAT MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMITS BE REQUIRED WHERE SPECIFIED USES AND/OR OCCUPANCIES INVOLVE MATTERS DEEMED TO BE OF CITYWIDE OR AREA -WIDE IMPORTANCE. THE CITY COMMISSION SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR DETERMINATIONS ON APPLICATIONS FOR MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMITS. (SEE ARTICLE 17 OF ORDINANCE 11000, AS AMENDED, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA.) THE DIRECTOR OF THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING SHALL MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS ON ALL APPLICATIONS FOR MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMITS AND FOR ANY AMENDMENTS THERETO AND SHALL TRANSMIT SAID APPLICATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD FOR ITS RECOMMENDATIONS AND MAY MAKE REFERRALS TO OTHER AGENCIES, BODIES, OR OFFICERS FOR REVIEW, ANALYSIS, AND/OR TECHNICAL FINDINGS AND DETERMINATIONS AND REPORTS THEREON. (SEE SECTION 1301.4 OF ORDINANCE 11000, AS AMENDED, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA.) ANY PERSON WHO RECEIVES COMPENSATION, REMUNERATION OR EXPENSES FOR CONDUCTING LOBBYING ACTIVITIES TO REGISTER AS A LOBBYIST WITH THE CITY CLERK, PRIOR TO ENGAGING IN LOBBYING ACTIVITIES BEFORE CITY STAFF, BOARDS, COMMITTEES AND THE CITY COMMISSION. A COPY OF SAID ORDINANCE IS AVAILABLE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK (MIAMI CITY HALL), LOCATED AT 3500 PAN AMERICAN DRIVE, MIAMI, FLORIDA, 33133. APPLICANTS ARE RESPONSIBLE, IF NEEDED, TO BRING AN INTERPRETER FOR THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE TO ANY PRESENTATION BEFORE CITY BOARDS, COMMITTEES AND THE CITY COMMISSION. POWER OF ATTORNEY WILL BE REQUIRED IF NEITHER APPLICANT OR LEGAL COUNSEL REPRESENTING THE APPLICANT EXECUTE THE APPLICATION OR DESIRE TO MAKE A PRESENTATION BEFORE CITY BOARDS, COMMITTEES AND THE CITY COMMISSION. I, Gilberto Pastoriza, Esq., on behalf of Ricardo Glas as Trustee who is the contract purchaser• of the 'subject property, hereby apply to the Director of the Planning and Zoning Department of the City of Miami for approval of a Major Use Special Permit under the provisions of Article 17 of the City of Miami Zoning Ordinance. Property Address: 300 S.E. 3'd Street; 200 S.E. 3`d Street; 200 S.E. 2nd Street Nature of proposed use (be specific): mixed-use residential/commercial/entertainment/office 1. Two 11 x17" original current surveys and one 24x36" original survey, prepared by a State of Florida Registered Land Surveyor within six months from the date of application. 2. Two 11x17" original plans and one 24x36" original plan, signed and sealed by a State of Florida Registered Architect or Engineer showing property boundaries, existing (if any) and proposed structure(s), parking, landscaping, etc.; building elevations and dimensions and computations of lot area and building spacing. 3. Plans need to be stamped by the Hearing Boards Division first and then signed by Public Works, Zoning and Planning prior to submission of application. 02-x.249 Rev. 06/04/02 4. Affidavit and disclosure of ownership of subject property and disclosure of interest (see attached forms). 5. Certified list of owners of real estate within a 500 -feet radius from the outside boundary of property (see pages 5 and 6). 6. At least two photographs that show the entire property (land and improvements). 7. Maps showing the existing zoning designation and the adopted comprehensive plan designation for areas on and around the property. 8. General location map showing relation to the site or activity to major streets, schools, existing utilities, shopping areas, important physical features in and adjoining the project, and the like. 9. Concept Plan: a) Site plan and relevant information per Section 1304.2.1 d -h in Zoning Ordinance 11000, as amended. b) Relationships to surrounding existing and proposed uses and activities, systems and facilities, per Section 1702.2.2a in Zoning Ordinance 11000, as amended. c) How concept affects existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan principles and designations; tabulation of any required variances, special permits, changes of zoning or exemptions, per Section 1702.2.2b in Zoning Ordinance 11000, as amended. 10. Developmental Impact Study (an application for development approval for a Development of Regional Impact may substitute). 11. Other (specify and attach cover letter explaining why any document you are attaching is pertinent to this application). 12. An 8 Y2 x 11" copy of all exhibits that will be presented at the hearing. 13. Twenty-five (25) "Major Use Special Permit" books containing the above information. If this project requires Zoning Board approval, a total of thirty-five (35) books wall be required. 14. Cost of processing according to the City Code: a) $ 46,675.00 , for the Major Use Special Permit b) Additional fee of $ 0 , for any required special permits, changes of zoning or variances. c) Total Fee: $ 46,675.00 15. Is the property within the boundaries of a historic site, historic district or archeological zone designated pursuant to Chapter 23 of the Miami City Code? YES, the applicant is requesting a Certificate of Appropriateness for ground disturbing activity in an Archaeological Conservation Area pursuant to Section 23-5(a), City of Miami Code. Support for this request is provided by An Architectural and Historical Assessment of Miami One -Parcels, Miami, Florida prepared by Robert S. Carr, Mark Lance, Victor Longo, and Stephanie Faulkner of Archaeological and Historical Conservancy, Inc., a copy of which is included under Tab 8 in Article III of the application booklet. Rev. 06/04/02 2 02-1219 16. Is the property within the boundaries of an Environmental Preservation District designated pursuant to Chapter 17 of the Miami City Code? NO 17. What is the purpose of this Major Use Special Permit? To permit a mixed-use residential/commercial/parking development consisting of 1500 residential units approximately 220,000 square feet of retail 9,000 square feet of office and approximately 4,284 parking spaces. Rev. 06/04/02 3 Signature Name Gilberto Pastoriza Address 2665 South Bayshore Drive Suite 420 Telephone (305) 854-0800 Date September 3, 2002 02-1249 STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 5'�" 20o-2.- , by personally known to me or who has produced identification and who did (did not) take an oath. (Stamp) STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE day of SQ,, 4-a_,L= er - who is an Individual as Signature eQY P&,!` ®FAAY SEAL D E SABINO T*n w ¢ COMMISSION NUMBER DD110042 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES OF F\P DEC. 28,2002 The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 20 , by day of of a corporation, on behalf of the corporation. He/She is personally known to me or has produced as identification and who did (did not) take an oath. (Stamp) STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE Signature The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20 , by partner (or agent) on behalf of partnership. He/She is personally known to me or who has produced as identification and who did (did not) take an oath. (Stamp) Signature a Rev. 06/04/02 4 ,1 r 4 9 WE.LSS SE -ROTA HELFiVIAN PASTOI3IZA & GUEDES, P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW MITCHELL A. BIERMAN MIAMI-DADE OFFICE NINA L. BONISKE 3107 STIRLING ROAD, SUITE 300 ALISON S. SIELER 2665 SOUTH BAYSHORE DRIVE JAMIE ALAN COLE TELEPHONE (954) 763-4242 • TELECOPIER (954) 764-7770 EDWARD G. GUEDES SUITE 420 STEPHEN J. HELFMAN MIAMI, FLORIDA 33133 GILBERTO PASTORIZA *OF COUNSEL JOSEPH H. SEROTA NANCY E. STROUD RICHARD JAY WEISS DAVID M. WOLPIN TELEPHONE (305) 854-0800 STEVEN W. ZELKOWITZ TELECOPIER (305) 854-2323 WWW.WSH-FLALAW.COM THOMAS J. ANSBRO* BROWARD OFFICE LILLIAN ARANGO DE LA HOZ* 3107 STIRLING ROAD, SUITE 300 ALISON S. SIELER FORT LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA 33312 MITCHELL J. BURNSTEIN TELEPHONE (954) 763-4242 • TELECOPIER (954) 764-7770 ELAINE M. COHEN STEPHANIE DEUTSCH* DOUGLAS R. GONZALES *OF COUNSEL September 5, 2002 VIA HAND DELIVERY Ms. Lourdes Slazyk City of Miami Department of Planning & Development 444 S.W. 2nd Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami, Florida 33.130 Re: Request for Phased Project Dear Ms. Slazyk: JOHN R. HERIN, JR. CHRISTOPHER F. KURTZ HARRIET R. LEWIS* PETER A. LICHTMAN KAREN LIEBERMAN* MATTHEW H. MANDEL BERNARD S. MANDLER* ALEXANDER L. PALENZUELA-MAURI MICHAEL S. POPOK* ANTHONY L. RECIO GARY I. RESNICK* MARK A. ROTHENBERG SCOTT A. ROBIN DANA J. SCHINDLER GAIL D. SEROTA* ARI C. SHAPIRO JEFFREY P. SHEFFEL FRANCINE THOMAS STEELMAN SUSAN L. TREVARTHEN CARMEN I. TUGENDER Our firm represents Ricardo Glas, Trustee ("Glas"). Glas is the contract purchaser of the property which is the subject of an application for Modification to a previously approved Major Use Special Permit which accompanies this request. The following information is provided in support of this request. Section 2502 of the City's Zoning Ordinance 11000 defines phase project as follows: "A phased project is one which, due to its magnitude, has to be developed in stages. Such project shall contain a minimum of three (3) acres of land. Any project which meets such requisite shall establish the maximum development capacity for the subject property. At the time of the qualification by the director of the planning, building and zoning department, as required below, such projects shall be owned by a single entity or subsidiaries of one (1) entity and may occupy contiguous lands, separated only by streets or alleys, and will be considered as one (1) project for the purpose of calculating all zoning requirements. Individual phases of such projects which reach the MUSP t;2-1249 Ms. Lourdes Slazyk September 5, 2002 Page 2 thresholds as established in article 17, shall also comply with all the conditions contained in section 1701(11). " A phased project must be qualified by the director of the planning, building and zoning department, at the written request of the property owner(s). The recipient of this qualification shall be responsible for the distribution of development rights within the boundaries of the subject property, subject to the limitations of this Zoning Ordinance." The property in question is described in the attached Exhibit "A" (the "Property") and consists of approximately 5.94 gross acres. The Property consists of two parcels located along S.E. 4' Street between S.E.2nd Avenues and Biscayne Boulevard ("Parcel B" and "Parcel C") and one parcel located on S.E.2nd Avenue between S.E. 2nd and 3' Avenues ("Parcel D"). MDM has an option to purchase the Property. Parcels B, C, and D are contiguous to each other. The proposed mixed-use project (the "Project") consists of three residential towers providing 1,500 dwelling units, parking, ground and second level retail (the "Residential Towers", collectively); a four-story entertainment complex with a 16 -screen movie theatre (the "Entertainment Complex"); and a multilevel parking garage building with 16,745 square feet of retail (the "Parking Garage"). The Residential Towers include a 39 -story condominium on Parcel B, a 42 -story apartment building on Parcel C, and a 72 -story apartment tower on Parcel D ("Parcel B Tower", "Parcel C Tower", and "Parcel D Tower", respectively). The Residential Towers, Entertainment Complex, and Parking Garage shall be collectively referred to as the "Project". MDM intends to develop the Project in phases. The project will be developed as one unified site in three phases of development. Phase I consists of the Parking Garage. Once finished, the Parking Garage will replace the parking currently existing on the Property's vacant lots as well as provide parking for construction employees working on the development. Phase II will consist of the Parcel B Tower, Entertainment Complex, and the Parcel C Tower. Lastly, Phase III will consist of the Parcel D Tower. Besides being contiguous to each other, the various phases: a. Will be treated as one site with a consistent streetscape and similar landscaping throughout; and b. Will be interconnected by covered loggias, wide sidewalks, parking and loading facilities. WEISS SEHOTA HELFMAI1T 42-1249 PASTORIZA & GuEDES, P.A. Ms. Lourdes Slazyk September 5, 2002 Page 3 We believe that for the reasons stated in this letter, the Project meets the City's requirements for a phased project and accordingly request that you approve the Project as a phased project. We look forward to your approval of this request. Please do not hesitate to call me if you have any questions or require additional information. vuv�.iI'M acaLAIL1 a GP/ms 372005 Enclosure cc: Tim Weller Bruce Brosch Stephen J. Helfman wEISS SEROTA HELFMAN PASTOEIZA. & GUEDES, P.A. 02-1249 WEI.SS SEROTA HELFMAN PASTOKIZA & GUEDES, P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW September 5, 2002 VIA HAND DELIVERY Ms. Lourdes Slazyk City of Miami Department of Planning & Development 444 S.W. 2nd Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami, Florida 33130 Re: Request for Retail Specialty Center Designation for One Miami Project Dear Ms. Slazyk: Our firm represents Ricardo Glas, Trustee ("Glas"). Glas is the contract purchaser of the property which is the subject of an application for Modification to a previously approved Major Use Special Permit to allow the proposed development (the "Project") which accompanies this request. The following information is provided in support of this request. Section 4-2 of the City's Code defines Retail Specialty Center as follows: "The retail component of a multiuse development, with a minimum of 50,000 square feet of net leasable area; such retail component to contain a mixture of retail shops and eating places which may include, by way of example and not limitation: retail shops selling apparel, furniture, men's or women's accessories or specialty gifts and such retail shops as pharmacies, newsstands, bookstores, high- tech or photography stores, flower or produce marts, arts and crafts shops or bakeries, and eating places such as restaurants, cafes, delicatessens, gourmet 02-1249 JOHN R. HERIN, JR. MITCHELL A. BIERMAN MIAMI-DADE OFFICE CHRISTOPHER F. KURTZ NINA L. BONISKE 2665 SOUTH BAYSHORE DRIVE HARRIET R. LEWIS' JAMIE ALAN COLE SUITE 420 PETER A. LICHTMA EDWARD G. GUEDES KAREN LIEBERMAN STEPHEN J. HELFMAN MIAMI, FLORIDA 33133 MATTHEW H. MANDEL GILBERTO PASTORIZA BERNARD S. MANDLER JOSEPH H. SEROTA ALEXANDER L. PAL NANCY E. STROUO ;NZUELA-MAORI MICHAEL S. POPOK RICHARD JAY WEISS TELEPHONE (305) 854-0800 ANTHONY L. RECTO DAVID M. WOLPIN TELECOPIER (305) 854-2323 GARY 1. RESNICK* STEVEN W. ZELKOWITZ MARK A. ROTHENBERG WWW.WSH-FLALAW.COM SCOTT A. ROBIN BROWARD OFFICE DANA J. SCHINDLER THOMAS J. ANSBRO' 3107 STIRLING ROAD, SUITE 300 GAIL D. SEROTA' LILLIAN ARANGO DE LA. HOZ' FORT LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA 33312 ARI C. SHAPIRO ALISON S. BIELER TELEPHONE (954) 763-4242 • TELECOPIER (954) 764-7770 JEFFREY P. SHEFFEL MITCHELL J. BURNSTEIN FRANCINE THOMAS STEELMAN ELAINE M. COHEN SUSAN L. TREVARTHEN STEPHANIE DEUTSCH' 'OF COUNSEL CARMEN I. TUGENDER DOUGLAS R. GONZALES September 5, 2002 VIA HAND DELIVERY Ms. Lourdes Slazyk City of Miami Department of Planning & Development 444 S.W. 2nd Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami, Florida 33130 Re: Request for Retail Specialty Center Designation for One Miami Project Dear Ms. Slazyk: Our firm represents Ricardo Glas, Trustee ("Glas"). Glas is the contract purchaser of the property which is the subject of an application for Modification to a previously approved Major Use Special Permit to allow the proposed development (the "Project") which accompanies this request. The following information is provided in support of this request. Section 4-2 of the City's Code defines Retail Specialty Center as follows: "The retail component of a multiuse development, with a minimum of 50,000 square feet of net leasable area; such retail component to contain a mixture of retail shops and eating places which may include, by way of example and not limitation: retail shops selling apparel, furniture, men's or women's accessories or specialty gifts and such retail shops as pharmacies, newsstands, bookstores, high- tech or photography stores, flower or produce marts, arts and crafts shops or bakeries, and eating places such as restaurants, cafes, delicatessens, gourmet 02-1249 Ms. Lourdes Slazyk September 5, 2002 Page 2 shops or fast food services. For purposes of this section the term "multiuse development" shall mean any development with: 1) Approval for retail use and at least one of the following types of uses: hotel, residential, movie theater, or office use; 2) A unified plan of development which shall include, but not be limited to, plans providing for the different uses in the development to be physically integrated through direct access from one to the other; 3) Parking provided by an on-site enclosed garage; and 4) All project uses under common management." Glas is requesting that the proposed retail/entertainment center (the "Center") located on the northeast corner of S.E. 4's Street and S.E. P Avenue be designated a Retail Specialty Center pursuant to Chapter 4 of the City's Code. The Center consists of 106,150 square feet of retail space and will include a 16 -screen movie theater. The Center meets the City of Miami's requirements for a Retail Specialty Center in the following ways: a) The Center will provide 106,150 square feet of net leasable area containing a mixture of retail shops and eating places, which far exceeds the 50,000 square feet of retail required by the Code; b) In addition to the retail component, the Center includes movie theater uses, therefore qualifying as a "multiuse development"; C) All buildings of the Project are integrated via consistent streetscapes, pedestrian -friendly wide sidewalks, and covered loggias; d) Parking for the various uses of the Project will be contained entirely within the Project; and e) All Project uses will be under common management. We believe that for the reasons stated in this letter, the Project meets the City's requirements for a Retail Specialty Center and accordingly request that you approve the Project as a Retail Specialty Center. WEISS SE$OTA HELFMAN ;J2 -x.249 PASTORIZA & GUEDES, P.A. Ms. Lourdes Slazyk September 5, 2002 Page 3 We look forward to your approval of this request. Please do not hesitate to call me if you have any questions or require additional information. Very trulyyiti , Gilberto Pastoriza GP/ms 372005 cc: Tim Weller Bruce Brosch Stephen J. Helfman WEISS SEBOTA HELFMAN 02-1249 PASTORIZA & GUEDES, P.A. 1. AFFIDAVIT Before me, the undersigned authority, this day personally appeared Lawrence J. DeGeorge, who being by me first deposes and says: 1. That he is the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Miami One Centre, Inc., a Florida corporation, General Partner of Miami One Centre Limited Partnership, a Florida limited partnership ("Owner"), submitting the accompanying application for a public hearing as required by the Code of the City of Miami, Florida, affecting the real property located in the City of Miami, as described and listed on the foregoing pages of this affidavit and made a part thereof. 2. That all owners which he represents, if any, have given their full and complete permission for him to act in their behalf for the Major Use Special Permit as set out in the accompanying application, ❑ including responding to day to day staff inquires; k not including responding to day to day staff inquiries in which case he should be contacted at c/o Gilberto Pastoriza, Esq., (305) 854-0800. 3. That the foregoing pages are made a part of this affidavit contain the current names, mailing addresses, telephone numbers and legal descriptions for the real property owned by Owner. 4. The facts as represented in the application and documents submitted in conjunction with this affidavit are true and correct. Further Affiant sayeth not. Lawrence J. DeGeorge Applicant Name STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF PALM BEACH Applicant Signat e, LawrenceJ. eGeorge The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this -/— day of 2002, by Lawrence J. DeGeorge, as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Miami One Centre, Inc., as G i One Centre Limited Partnership, a Florida limited partnership. He i ;j&onally known to me -u-Who has produced i ratification and who did (did not) take an oath. Y (Stamp) gn ture Opp {tY PUe!' � VRII C PRUSFUA COMMISSIONNUA8ER MY IS8IONOOMM DfPI W 9T`cOF F`o�0 SEPT4,2005 o2-1249 OWNER'S LIST Owner's Name Miami One Center Limited Partnership Mailing Address c/o Gilberto Pastoriza 2665 South Bayshore Drive, Suite 420 Miami Florida Zip Code 33133 Telephone Number _ (305).854-0800 Legal Description: See attached Exhibit "A" Owner's Name Mailing Address Telephone Number Legal Description: Owner's Name Mailing Address Telephohe Number Legal Description: Zip Code Zip Code Any other real estate property owned individually, jointly, or severally (by corporation, partnership or privately) within 500 feet of the subject site is listed as follows: Street Address Legal Description Street Address Street Address Legal Description Legal Description Rev. 06/04/02 � 2 " 1 2 4 " 6 EXIHBIT "A" Lots 1 though 8, inclusive, Block 2, together with all of Blocks 3 and 4, Du Pont Plaza, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 50, Page 11, public records of Dade County Florida. �;2-124' DISCLOSURE OF OWNERSHIP 1. Legal description and street address of subject real property: See attached Exhibit "A" 2. Owner(s) of subject real property and percentage of ownership. Note: The Code of the City of Miami requires disclosure of all parties having a financial interest, either direct or indirect, in the subject matter of a presentation, request or petition to the City Commission. Accordingly, question #2 requires disclosure of shareholders of corporations, beneficiaries of trusts, and/or any other interested parties, together with their addresses and proportionate interest. Miami One Centre Limited Partnership General Partner: Miami One Centre, Inc. 5900 Blue Lake Drive Suite 150 Boca Raton, FL 33431 Miami One Centre, Inc. is owned as follows: Lawrence J. DeGeorge Morris L. Stoltz, II Ned L. Siegel Limited Partners: Miami One Holdco, Ltd. 140 Intracoastal Pointe Drive Suite 410 Jupiter, Florida 33477 1% Ownership Interest 331/3% 331/3% 331/3% 33% Ownership Interest Miami One Holdco, Ltd. Is owned by: Lawrence J. DeGeorge 100% NLS Miami Partners 5000 Blue Lake Drive Suite 150 Boca Raton, Florida 33431 NLS Miami Partners is owned by: Ned L. Siegel Fred B. Rothman Bruce S. Grundt Marc Siegel JLA Realco LLC /Joel Wolff Howard Schoor 33% Ownership Interest 52.626% 7.336% 7.336% 13.826% 5.05% 6.913% 6.913% 02:-1249 M.L. Stoltz Miami Partners 301 Yamato Road Suite 3101 Boca Raton, Florida 33431 M.L. Stoltz Miami Partners is owned by: BFMC Investment, L.L.C. 701 S.E. 6th Avenue Suite 204 Delray Beach, Florida 33483 BFMC Investment, LLC is owned by: 18.415% Ownership Interest Charles E. Johnson 50% Morris L. Stoltz 50% 14.585% Ownership Interest Barry W. Florescue 100% 3. Legal description and street address of any real property (a) owned by any party listed in answer to question #2, and (b) located within 500 feet of the subject real property. None MIAMI ONE CENTRE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Florida limited partnership By: Miami One Centre, Inc., a Florida corporation, General Partner Lawrence J. eGeorge Chairman nd Chief Execive Officer STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2002, by Lawrence J. DeGeor a Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of MiamIlOne Centre Inc. Gener artner iami One Centre Limited Partnership, a Florida limited partnership. He/She personally knoa or who has produced as i i i w ion and whe ft—(i not) take an oath. r (Stamp) Signat re O�Pgr P�e°F n� MgM Q ca+ssM Nu+tM DDOPM 9 OF F`O�O Mr SMOSION SFT FOS 02-1249 i EXMIT "A" Lots 1 though 8, inclusive, Block 2, together with all of Blocks 3 and 4, Du Pont Plaza, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 50, Page 11, public records of Dade County Florida. o2-1249 DISCLOSURE OF OWNERSHIP 1. Legal description and street address of subject real property: See attached Exhibit "A". 2. Contract Purchaser(s) of subject real property and percentage of ownership. Note: The Code of the City of Miami requires disclosure of all parties having a financial interest, either direct or indirect, in the subject matter of a presentation, request or petition to the City Commission. Accordingly, question #2 requires disclosure of shareholders of corporations, beneficiaries of trusts, and/or any other interested parties, together with their addresses and proportionate interest. Z C_kyLp 0 6 LA -S -- 6-6 (,-& L L" s (7 of O �` a , --l„ 3-3 j r(o 3. Legal description and street address of any real property (a) owned by any party listed in answer to question #2, and (b) located within 500 feet of the subject real property. Ricardo Glas, as Trustee Contract Purchaser Name STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE Contract Purchaser Signature The foregoing iWtrumen was acNnowledged before me this 3 day of 20 00 - by di7e'aOLEC G IS who is an individual personally known to me or who has produced as identification and who did (did not) take an oath. KA &,AAAAAAAAAAAIA".A,AAA,.IAA!ARA EXMIT "A" Lots 1 though 8, inclusive, Block 2, together with all of Blocks 3 and 4, Du Pont Plaza, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 50, Page 11, public records of Dade County Florida. 92-1249 H011 t n 1 11 3; D5 �' n 1: 19 2 0 SPECIAL WARtL4NTY DEED REC 18341 2334 TIBS IND -- MIME. made this`' day of 199: by MI -IMI CE -\'MR I0rN T VENTURE, a Florida general partnership having an address at rlo World Financial Properties, L.P., One Liberty Plaza, New York, New York 10006 ("Grantor"), in favor of Miami One Centre Limited Partnership a Florida limited partnership , !raving an address at 301 Yamato Road 13101, Boca Raton, Florida 33/=31 ("Grantee"). WITNESSETH, that Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars ($10.00) in hand paid and other good and valuable corzideration, the receipt and sufbcienry of which are hereby acknowledged, by these presents does GRANT, SELL and CON- VEY unto Grantee, its successors and assigns the following described real property: . Being that certain tract of land loo=ted in Dade County, Florida and being more particularly described on Schedule A attached hereto and trade a pan hereof, together with all improvements, buildings, or Extures situated or located thereon, and all appurtenant rights, privileges or easements belonging or in any way relating thereto, including but not limited to, all interest, if any, of Grantor in any land lying in or under the bed of any highway, avenue, street, road, alley, easement or right-of-way, open or proposed, in, on, across, abutting or adjacent to the C L:.:.:.....::�, :vpeu.e: wsi:i au oT Gran[oi5 right, tirie and interest to any strips and gores within or bounding the property (all of said property and interest being collectively referred to herein as the "Property"). TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the Property, together with any and all the rights and appurtenances thereto in anywise belonging to Grantor, unto Grantee, its successors and assigns FOREVER. Grantor, for itself and its successors, does covenant, promise and agree, to and with Grantee that Grantor has not done or suffered to be done, anything whereby the Property hereby granted is, or may be, is any manner encumberFd or charged, subject, however, to all easements, covenants, agreements, restrictions and reservations of record, if any. Grantor does hereby warrant and agree to defend title to the Property against the lawful claims of all persons claiming by, through or under Grantor, but not otherwise, snibject to all easements, covenants, agreements, restrictions and reservations of record, if any. This instrument is executed and delivered pursuant to an Order Confirming Amended Plan ofReorganization of Miami Center Joint Venture pursuant to Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code (the 'Order") dated September 18, 1997 of the United States Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of New York (the "Bankruptcy Court"), and entered on September 19, 1997 on the docket in the case of In re 1vFiami Center Joint Venture, Debtor Documertfory Stamps Cotlecfed 5� $ �'< SUP,TAX Doc. 5:amps Col rt d c -BM NY 1130OMJ40.02 Gass "C" Intangible Tax Colt zcle:i S 1011'97 L�t.t lark, Dade County, Fla. Byr)c Lq S� °Ff EC 18341 Pc 2335 (Chapter 11 Case No. 96 B 44892 (JLG)). which Order provide; for the transfer of the said premises pursuant to this irinrutnent. IN WITNESS WREREOF, Grantor has caused its name to be signed to these presents the day and year first above written. Witnessed: IMAM CENTER JOINT VENTURE By. wFP Florida Equity Corp., Managing GeneralPartrer BY. Name: Ed. ni•i Qi iir. e_r By: 1 /� Name: 701,., A. By: JAL l.. _ rLy� . Title: E x tw V%v %1. Name: 1! si-1..1 e . ICS. e_ Tax Parcel LD. Nos.: 010114 030 1041 010114 030 1050 01 01 14 030 1270 01 01 14 030 1130 After recording, this document should be returned to: 1:w0csW?%t m u30M"SQc2 -2- 1011197 J2-1249 el C 18341 PG 2,31 STATE OF ) ss.: COUNTY- OF n the a day of �9�ti 199,7 before me personally came to me known, who, being by me duly sworn, did dcpose and say he resides at /moo 3usu yl ; that he is the riz&- 4 ..�a &t - - - of .M Florida Equity Corp., the corporation which is described in and which executed the foregoing instrument; which corporation is the general partner of NEA-W CEN ER JOLNT VENTURE, the partnership which executed the foregoing instrument; that the execution of the instrument by WFP Florida Equity Corp. was duly authorized according to the partnership agreement of said partnership; that the general partner executed the instrurnent on behalf of the said partnership pursuant to said authorization and that he knows the seal of said corporation; that the seal affixed xed to said instrument is such corporate seal; that it was so affixed by authority of the board of direor & of said corporation, and that he signed his narne thereto by like authority. dZt�-� ✓ ' Notary Public, State of taRc-' T ATAAAGAN i myala No. 3t �s5 0 Marne printed: ',P,-rr s / ASH C Ant atutitw in Now Y=t CCUW C- r- cs,A.ai 0-j"„” My Cornmission Expires: 2143 i 1g f Commission No.: 04 [NOTARLAL SEAL] _ IADOCSIZMI til 1I30W"540.02 -3- IOIIJ97 2 -1249 OFF EC ( @4 In 233T. I�. SCHEDULE A LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lots 1 thru, 8 Block 2, Lots I thru I4 Block 3, Lots i thru 8 Block 4 and Tr D Block 1 of Dupont Plaza, according to the Plat thereof as recorded in Plat Boor: 50, at Page 11, of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, LESS that portion of said Tract D described as follows: Begin at the Northeast coater of said Tract D and run West along the North line of Tract D for 645.94 feet to a Point of Curvature-, thence Southwesterly along a circular curve to the left having a radius of 25.0,0 feet and a central angle of 61 degrees 26 minutes 00 seconds for an arc distance of 26.81 fejt to a Point of Corn. Curvature; thence Southerly along a circular curve to the left having a radius of 300.00 feet and a central angle of 28 degrees 34 irdnutes 00 seconds for an arc distance of 149.57 feet to a Point of Tangency; thence South for 293.5D feet (said last mentioned four courses being coincident with the boundary litres of said Tract D); thence east for 179.41 feet; thence North for 150.00 feet; thence Fast for 525.36 feet; thence North 00 degrees 04 minutes 07 seconds West along the East line of said Tract D for 300.00 feet to the Point ofBeginning_ �xw�o:., `rte"°`A` r papE co�•vrr. c�a.:.x HARVEY RUVIN GURC t7a:Yr efz" T I:'DOCS97'?.'.S_?�'Y 1130100'i7Sa0.02 10!114? 2-1249 ONE MIAMI MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT 1. Section 1304.1.1 Application Forms; Supplementary Materials. a. Statements of ownership and control of the proposed development. The Disclosure of Ownership and Ownership affidavit are provided in Article I. b. Statement describing in detail-- the character and intended use of the development. One Miami (the "Project") is intended to be a mixed-use residential, commercial, and office development in downtown Miami, just north of the Miami River within Miami's Central Business District (CBD). As the -first development to offer substantial residential housing in that area of downtown, the intent is to create a new pedestrian -friendly downtown neighborhood providing residential, retail, entertainment, and fitness and recreation amenities not only for the residents of the Project, but also for workers in downtown, tourists and business travelers occupying the closely situated hotels, and residents of the nearby Brickell area. The Project includes three residential towers that will provide 1,500 much needed housing' units to the downtown area and 9,000 square •feet of office space, as well as over 218,500 square feet in ground and second floor retail. Integrated into the center of the development via well-designed pedestrian passages will be a four-story retail/entertainment complex with 106,150 square feet of retail including 16 movie screens. Further emphasizing the pedestrian nature of the Project, the development includes urban design -style wide sidewalks, pedestrian encouraging plazas, and lush landscaping along all corridors. Lastly, the entire Project has been designed to accommodate the views and property values of the surrounding buildings and uses. The property is comprised of three parcels, described as "Parcel B", "Parcel C", and "Parcel D", respectively. Parcel B is surrounded by Southeast 3`d Street on the north, Biscayne Boulevard Way/Southeast 0 Street on the south, Biscayne Boulevard on the east, and Southeast 31d Avenue on the west. It has a net lot area of 2.46 acres (107,343 square feet) and a gross lot area of 3.76 acres (163,785 square feet). The eastern portion of Parcel B will be developed as a 39 story, 400 -unit condominium with 36,425 square feet of ground and second -floor retail, which will include 926 parking spaces. The western portion will contain the 4 -story retail/entertainment complex which will provide 106,150 square feet of retail including 16 movie screens. 1 �2_t249 Parcel C is surrounded by Southeast Std Street on - the north, Biscayne Boulevard/Southeast 4dr Street on the south, Southeast 3rd Avenue on the east, and Southeast 20d Avenue on the west. - It has a net lot area of 1.74 acres (75,780 square feet) and a gross lot area of 2.75 acres (119,790 square feet). Parcel C will be developed as a 450 -unit, 42 -floor apartment building with 9,000 square feet of office space and 32,850 square feet of ground and second floor retail. The apartment building will include 922 parking spaces as well as loading facilities to accommodate both itself and the retail/entertamnient complex to the east. Parcel D is surrounded by Southeast 2°d Street on the north, Southeast Std Street on the south, Southeast 3'd Avenue on the east, and Southeast 2' Avenue on the west. It has a net lot area of 1.74 acres (75,777 square feet) and a gross lot area of 2.79 acres (121,532 square feet). The eastern portion of Parcel D will be developed as a mixed-use retail, recreation, and parking structure that will provide 1,467 spaces to replace the existing number of surface parking spaces, accommodate the additional parking needs of the retaiUentertainment complex, and provide Project's parking needs during the phases of construction. The parking structure will also house 33,200 square feet of retail. The western portion of Parcel D will be developed as a 650 -unit, 72 -floor apartment building which will include 10,000 square feet of ground and second floor retail and 969 parking spaces. The first phase of development for the entire project calls for construction of the Parcel D parking structure that will accommodate the current users of the surface lot and construction workers working on the Project. Drawings showing the location of the intended uses are included under Tab 7 of Article III. c. General location map, showing relation of the site for which special permit is sought to major street, schools, existing utilities, shopping areas, important physical features in and adjoining the project and the like. Location maps and aerial maps indicating the surrounding streets and properties are included in Article I. d. A site plan containing the title pf the project and the names of the project planner and developer, date, and north arrow based on an exact survey of the property drawn of sufficient size to show: The Site Plan is located under Tab 2, Article III. 2 U2-12.49 i. Boundaries of the project, any existing streets, buildings, watercourses, easements, and section lines. The boundaries of the project and the location of existing streets and easements are shown on the survey located under Tab 1, Article M. ii. Exact location of all buildings and structures. -All three parcels are vacant and have no buildings as shown on the Survey located under Tab 1, Article M. The locations of the buildings are shown on the plans located under Tab 7, Article M. in. Access and traffic flow and how vehicular traffic will be separated from pedestrian and other types of traffic. A detailed analysis of the site access. and traffic flow for the development is provided in the Traffic Impact Study located under Tab 3, Article M. One Miami is intended to be a pedestrian -friendly urban environment: As such, all parcels will be interconnected by wide sidewalks, covered loggias, and ample plazas. The streetscapes of the Project will be consistent in order to unify the three parcels. Ingress and egress to the parking structures have been designed to minimize interference with pedestrian traffic. The service areas of each building will be located towards the rear of the buildings and away from the high volume pedestrian traffic that will take place at the front of the buildings. Furthermore, the Project has been designed so that all second -floor pedestrian traffic between the retail areas of Parcels' B and C takes place across pedestrian bridges. This not only separates retail pedestrian traffic from street traffic, but also helps to ensure the economic viability of the retail businesses that will be located on the second floors. iv. Offstreet parking and offstreet loading areas. The Project significantly exceeds the Zoning Ordinance requirements for parking and loading. To wit, while only 1,728 parking spaces are required, the project provides 4,284 parking spaces. Each building will provide its own offstreet parking internally, with the exception of the retail/entertainment complex which will locate its parking across the street in the parking garage of Parcel D. In addition, the Parcel D - parking garage will provide replacement parking to 3 02-1249 accommodate the surface parking currently located on all three parcels. Loading and delivery areas are provided as shown in the plans, interior to each residential building. - Loading and delivery for the retail/entertainment complex will take place in the loading bays provided in Parcel C. From there, merchandise and supplies will be transported to the retail/entertainment complex via underground tunnel. The intent of the interior loading bays and tunnel is to screen the surrounding areas form unsightly trucks and eliminate delivery -related traffic disruptions. v.- Recreation facilities locations. All three residential towers will provide meeting and social rooms for the use of their residents. In addition, the three residential towers will contain rooftop recreation decks at their respective podium levels which will include state-of-the-art infinity edge pools and lavish landscaping. Parcel D's parking garage building will provide a 12,600 square foot fitness club as well as a rooftop lap pool and jogging track for the use of well fitness club members. The retail/entertamment center is also designed to provide recreational amenities (movie theater) to the entire Property. vi. All screens and buffers. Rooftop mechanical equipment on the three residential towers will be buffered from view by distinctive architectural elements which will serve to identify the project as a unified neighborhood and further serve to emphasize the landmark nature of the entire One Miami project. All other mechanical equipment will be located within the internal spaces of the buildings. The extensive landscaping is illustrated in pages SP 2 and SP 3, located under Tab 7, Article III. vii. Refuse collection areas. Waste collection will be provided by the City of Miami or by a private company and will be internal to each building. There will be no curbside refuse collection. viii. Access to utilities and points of utilities hookups. All utilities shall be underground. Access and connections to site utilities are discussed in the Site Utility Study located under Tab 4, Article M. 4i`�`"`� e. Tabulations of total gross acreage in the project and the percentages thereof proposed to be devoted to: i. The various permitted uses. Parcel B: Gross acreage: 3.76 acres Total developable area (TDA): 1,133,000 square feet (26.0 acres) Residential: 593,645 square feet (52.4% of TDA Retail (includes cinema): 142,575'square feet (12.6% of TDA) Parcel C: Gross acreage: 2.75 acres Total developable area (TDA): 1,130,845 square feet (26.0 acres) Residential: 624,335 square feet (55.2% of TDA) Retail: 32,850 square feet (2.9% of TDA) Office: 9,000 square feet (0.8 % of TDA) Parcel D: Gross acreage: 2.79 acres Total developable area (TDA): 1,836,800 square feet (42.2 acres) Residential: 732,500 square feet (39.9% of TDA) Retail: 43,200 square feet (2.4% of TDA) TOTAL: Gross acreage: 9.3 acres Total developable area (TDA): 4,100,645 square feet (94.2 acres) Residential: 1,950,480 square feet (47.696 of TDA) Retail (including cinema): 218,625 square feet (5.3 % of TDA) Office: 9,000 square feet (0.2% of TDA) ii. Ground coverage by structures. Ground coverage for Parcel B is 44 % of the gross lot area. Ground coverage for Parcel C is 51 % of the gross lot area. Ground coverage for Parcel D is 55 % of the gross lot area. 5 92-1249 f. Tabulation showing: L The derivation of numbers of offstreet parking and offstreet loading spaces shown in -(d) _above. The minimum total number of spaces required is 1,728. The total number of spaces provided is 4,284 which includes parking for new development as well as replacement parking for the spaces on the currently vacant parcels. The derivation of the number of offstreet parking spaces is included within the Project Data Summary in Article I. ff.. Total project density in dwelling units per acre. The Project calls for 161 units per gross acre, well under the 1,000 units per acre permitted in the Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan and the Zoning Ordinance. In fact, even when analyzed individually, each parcel will be developed at far less than the permitted density. The approximate density of the Parcel B condominium tower is 106 units per gross acre. Parcel C has an approximate density of 164 units per gross acre. Parcel D's apartment building provides for an approximate density of 233 units per gross acre. g. Statements as to how common facilities are to be provided and permanently maintained. All common facilities will be maintained initially by the Owner. Common facilities of the Tract B Condominium tower will be maintained by the condominium association. It. Storm drainage and sanitary sewerage plans. Storm drainage, water distribution, waste water and solid waste generation provisions are discussed in the Site Utility study under Tab 4, Article M. i. Architectural definitions for buildings in the development; exact number of dwelling units, sizes, and types, together with typical floor plans of each type - Parcel B contains 400 condominium units. Parcel C contains 450 apartment units. Parcel D contains 650 apartment units. Detailed information and breakdown of square footage of all uses are found in the Project Date Summary located in Article I. 02-249 2 Typical floor plans for the three residential towers are included in under Tab 7, { Article III. j. Signage plans. Signage for each building within the project will be done separately, as the need arises. k. Landscaping plan, including types, sizes and locations of vegetation and decorative shrubbery, and showing provisions for irrigation and future maintenance. The streetscapes, will be consistent throughout and will include lavish landscaping, extra -wide sidewalks with decorative pavers, plazas, and covered loggias. A description of the proposed landscaping is. included B the landscaping plans provided in Sheets SP 2 through SP 3, located under Tab 7; Article M. 1. Plans for recreation facilities, including location and general description of buildings for such use. All three residential towers will provide meeting and social rooms for the use of their residents. In addition, the three residential towers will provide rooftop recreation decks at their respective podium levels which will include state-of- the-art infinity edge pools and lavish landscaping. Parcel D's parking garage building will provide a 12,600 square foot fitness club as well as a rooftop lap pool and jogging track for the use of the residents living in the Parcel D residential tower as well fitness club members. The retail/entertainment center is also designed to provide recreational amenities (movie theater) to residents and visitors to the Project. in. Such additional data, maps, plans, or statements as may be required for the particular use or activity involved. The drawings submitted with this Application are located under Tab 7, Article M. n. Such additional data as the applicant may believe is pertinent to the proper review for compliance and consideration of the site and development plan. Elevations and sections depicting the architectural and aesthetic character of the project are included in Sheets A6.1 through A6.8 and 7.1 through 7.2, located under Tab 7, Article III. 7 02-1249 2. Section 1702.2.1 General Report a. Property ownership and beneficial interest within the boundaries of the area proposed for Major Use Special Permit. Statement of Ownership and beneficial interest within the boundaries of the area proposed for the Major Use Special Permit are provided in Article I. b. The nature of the unified interest or control. The nature of unified interest or control it indicated in Article I. c. Survey of the proposed area showing property lines and ownership; existing features, including streets, alleys, easements, utilities lines, existing land use, general topography, and other physical features. A copy of the Survey is included under Tab 1, Article III. d. Materials to demonstrate the relationship of the elements listed in (3) preceding to surrounding area characteristics. The drawings submitted with this 'Application are located under Tab 7, Article III. e. Existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan designations for the area on and around the lands proposed for Major Use Special Permit. The existing zoning designation for the property pursuant to the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, is CBD, Central Business District. Page 36 of the Official Zoning Atlas Map is located in Article I, and indicates the existing and surrounding zoning. The Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan future land use designation for the property is Central Business District and is shown on the land use map located in Article I. Additionally, the Project is located within the Downtown Miami Development of Regional Impact (the "DRI"). The proposed uses for the Project are permitted in the DRI and are consistent with both the properties' zoning district and future land use designation. The Project was also the subject of Resolution No. 98-1151 which approved a Major Use Special Permit (the "Original MUSP") on the Property. The proposed intensity of development will have a far lesser impact than the development contemplated by the Original MUSP. 8 6'2--249 f. Analysis demonstrating consistency and concurrency with the adopted - comprehensive neighborhood plan. The future land use element of the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan designates the property Central Business District. The Central Business District designation permits high-density multifamily residential uses with retail uses on lower floors. - The designation also permits commercial, recreation, and entertainment facilities. Therefore, the proposed development is consistent with' the Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan. The Traffic Impact Analysis and Site Utility Study (Tabs 3 and 4, of -Article III, respectively) indicate adequate infrastructure capacity to meet the impact of this development. 3. Major Use Special Permit Concept Plan.' a. Relationship of concept plan to eSisting and proposed surrounding uses. The intent of the Project is to create a new downtown residential neighborhood complete with retail, office, entertainment, dining, and fitness/recreation areas that will be used by the project's residents, workers in the surrounding offices, tourists staying at the nearby hotels, and residents of the burgeoning Brickell area to the south. The proposed residential uses will complement the Central Business District's office buildings in providing much needed area housing for employees. Area employees will benefit from the increase in retail, dining, entertainment and fitness amenities provided by the Project. Area businesses will benefit from the increased likelihood of workers remaining in downtown after work. Lastly, the Project's layout and tower design will minimise obstructions to the existing view corridors of the office towers in the area. b. Existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan principles and designations. The project conforms to the CBD Central Business District zoning for this property. The City's future land use map designation is consistent with the proposed development. Therefore, no changes are needed to the Zoning Ordinance or Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan to accommodate the development. The applicant is also requesting the approvals and permits described in the Summary of Approvals located in Article I. 4. Development Impact Study. a. Economy of City. The Economic Impact Study is included under Tab 5, Article III. The project will have a favorable impact on the economy of the City during construction and ' after completion. 9 • 02--1249 b. Public Services A Traffic Impact Study and Site Utility Study are included under Tabs 3 and 4 of Article III, respectively. The project will have a neutral impact on the City's public services. c. Environment. The property is not located withig an Environmental Preservation District. The project will have a neutral impact on the environment. d. Housing supply. The project will result in an increase of 1,500 dwelling units which will address the deficiency in housing in the downtown area. The impact of the project will be favorable to the City. 10 02-4949 y ONE MIAMI CBD/CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT Per CITY CODE, Chapter 36, Construction Equipment Request for waiver of noise ordinance while under construction for continuous pours. Per CITY CODE, Section 55-14 to have City Commission approve the pedestrian bridges across SE 3`d Avenue. Per CITY CODE, Chapter 4, designation of the entertainment retail center located at the NE comer of SE 3`d Avenue and SE 4d' Street as retail specialty center as that term is defined in Section 4-2. Per CITY CODE, Chapter 23-5(a), Request for a Certificate of Appropriateness for ground disturbing activity in an Archaelogical Conservation Area. SUBSTANTIAL MODIFICATION TO A MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT, per Article 17, Section 1701, and Article 22 of City of Miami Zoning Ordinance 11000, as amended, to allow a change in the original application (substantial modification for previously approved resolution # C C 98-1151) from 383,000 square feet (as modified by resolution # C C 02-858) of nonresidential floor area to approximately 240,000 square feet; SUBSTANTIAL MODIFICATION TO A MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT, per Article 17, Section 1701, and Article 22 of City of Miami Zoning Ordinance 11000, as amended, to allow a change in the original application (substantial modification for previously approved resolution # C C 98-1151) from parking structures consisting of 5815 spaces (as modified by resolution # C C 02-858) to approximately 4,284 spaces; SUBSTANTIAL MODIFICATION TO A MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT, per Article 17, Section 1701, and Article 22 of City of Miami Zoning Ordinance 11000, as amended, to allow a change in the original application (substantial modification for previously approved resolution # C C 98-1151) to convert 250,000 square feet of office use to residential use using the same coefficient as those in Increment I of the Downtown Miami Development of Regional Impact. (250,000) x (.0044) = 1,100 units Prior to above conversion, 1,172,000 square feet (resolution # C C 98-1151 as modified by resolution # C C 02-858) of office was available. After the conversion 1,022,000 square feet is still available. Prior to above conversion, 600 residential units (resolution # C C 98-1151 as modified by resolution # C C 02-858) were available. After above conversion, 1,700 units are now available. The Major Use encompasses the following special permits: 02-1249 CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT, as per Article 4, Section 401, for a temporary construction fence and covered walkway within the Central Business District. CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 4, Section 401, for development of new construction within the Central Business District. CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 908.2 for access from a public street roadway width greater than 25 feet. CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 4, Section 401 to approve open space and/or residential recreation space as shown on the plans. CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 4, Section 401 to allow for wholesale activities at the ground floor level along designated primary pedestrian pathways so long as ground floor frontage consists of a retail or open to the public component. CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 4, Section 401 to allow for parking garages. CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 4, Section 401 to allow for outdoor eating areas, outdoor cafes, outdoor display and sale of food or live flowers and plants. CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 922.8 to allow for combined off-street loading facilities. CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 903.1 to allow development of a project divided by a street. CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Section 915.2 for FAA clearance letter. CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 925.3.8, to allow development/construction/rental signage CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 918.2 for parking and staging of construction during construction. CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 920. 1, to allow a trailer and watchman's quarters for construction and other temporary office uses such as leasing and sales. CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 922.4(c) to allow maneuvering of trucks on public rights of way. CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 906.6, for pool/outdoor recreation area. 2 62-1249 CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 917.1.2 to allow valet parking for - residential and other uses. CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 906.9 to allow for a special event namely a ground breaking ceremony. CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 4, Section 401 to allow for bars, saloons, taverns and/or supper clubs. CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 4, Section 401 to allow for child day care facilities CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 917. 1.1 to allow backing into a street. Designation as a phased project, pursuant to Section 2502 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, as amended (approved by Reso. No. 98-1151) from parcel a, b, c, d to east half of d first, then b and c, then west half of d. REQUEST that the following MUSP conditions be required at the time of Temporary Certificate of Occupancy or Final Certificate of Occupancy instead of at issuance of foundation permit: b. the requirement to record in the Public Records a Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions providing that the ownership, operation and maintenance of all common areas and facilities will be by the property owner or a mandatory property owner association; and C. the requirement to record in the Public Records a unity of title or covenant in lieu of unity of title. toningcecPhee Inspector II 3 r. 92-1249 X111 III.YYnIN\IN IX\IIIplIINI II .v I\MINI: VIWIlI1.vIM1M+\ 1'y. ,"" Rlx 1'I IitU VI: YA.Xtnllll l\INl\PI N,iilw�ii PANORAMIC SKYLINE VIEW OF MIAMI FROM MIAMI BEACH FL. nITTI (.F.\IM'nil'I\N �l Ix.x\W NI .Nuv tni Yl uu ln.l.IN .Xlnl:n.\r 1'0': .. ILOOKING %VLST) `I �i:'.w I'u \ I1w111.V111 \V �x.XINNII\Il �lil' IN \IIIM\N V I Il.\v : nNhl\II. N r.\xN1\II I I \I I \1 IIIIlIF II\V\.1111uIa Iq••NI.y' <W NN 1i i1IlIrllt\II xN it N.. I -° i pYllll �I P M X1i 1� 1. \ IV 1 11 -A' pEI e e O 111M N \ 111Iall Ylhl11 V I M \\ 11 X I\ 1 11 h 1 I�MIN IVLFIII\„NX. I N 4 � DOWNTUWNMIAMI � 1111 1111 111.,5 I1Na111N1A1 11 IAW I.UII\II ut VM "11IX VIII VIRh 1111\'.\IN WM4N11.\N .\,a ila. Inuau ltlM kN 1\.\tNl\ a'•Vlr ';IN�. 1'Y' ,y� I:1e•:rX' ttWWWW'"'NNNNIIII �'M 1. i A,1 allatlrlNNlellwNxlll ..r. n. XII Ie IN I.w IN;fNVI I'° wCIRI �I TRACT AM CENTER CENTER UA1•YNUNT PARK TRACT ONE MIAMI 6 PUNIM PARKING j1.\u q� TONING ANALY313 •y..�Il lln Ai, ► / ' _� SMUTN,F.'.IiT.SF.COA'D STREET eruu xl—•1 s---- C1111N7'1'ANU "• r,n� "ARRIOTT IIU'TF.I. Rl 1 x ... .............. IN'FERS'[A'1'P. NTr 1 ^. ..w.... - .-YOUTIWASTTN111NSMEET . 'TRACT C C "•� �" `�' "`' •�• " ""' "'" SNI'THE. IST FINN_ 111 S MET' woo 11\.\17 NEI:Y.N['T: - �'• t' "Dump r P .... ••,,..,----._.._--- SIIA\II IIIYEII ••«•. �.� 'I LAST NNICKEI.l. I<� _. .,,. —, f ::r:V'•I;a;> �iaT:,.• 2211 LOCATION MAP &AERIAL SIT VIE !!! 1 ' •.... �.............-.d SCALA 1'- IQU.,O. ....n' •drf c �Do 1• s Rti �' i �; •�iP� ���,�I+ 1 n F��' 'I tS i1_ Ids L �rE LIE���::�1'' ���� "�.T; d11 NJ E� 1 lwil Vol fff `7 [A - •�Ttl'�� . ! �zr . �' � 1{.. r.. T T T `3rI" V" �F' 7'F _. 1 w10.itl�w.Rs< Hl®'i�` ."t�� :'\_ .vttKa'1[4� �d!l.:l�'.(o♦:,�_a°4r1:,; j=�,�. ✓1 ,'.:.L'fr, �, W3,9 h Cil 2271 SP I I I' lr �I' i ' 6 ' f+ij �i1,4,a� 6 lhrl Y I I iY�' Pli 1y41 �• �inf l t l It�yl M 1 � VII k�I. ly 1 1NI S I �f S I IJ+ � ll� l +ddh la �II� d, I11 14.4 h f Ii q Irl Illjrl I I Ili II �iI 'Yliilrl ► II'f jt��r'. 1,Y 1 G. ,�I I n r it bll I NII I I �I �' - II �ppI - I , ' . <'�•ik ► II f; 'l III uI`11 �N r� l I � Irql I �, i II'F,�h. , . I �I v) jV.lia,r, I � 1f 11' I 4 I i y I' I I� S,�'1 x !!41 '�� i �V � '' • n.,; � I�.(yll I If I � '•' � I I,'�� � I rR,� V�1 ( I. 1 h q�; 4P+r ."" ". j til; 14 ray: I � � Ik �� I •I � t. Y41� �, i5 + ,�P C �1« II N tit I'.I��. . � ,1 _.._. I i rk „t� 4d417yA!►4p i' � ,�Yr' t! � � ! ,I. i � :t�' .'!''°��7q .�•� '',►• I t I : 1 +j�,9�`0' ��'h�i � : I!' +l ,A. l ,. t, � � rl �'iy,f:, � ' IAN!! 'Ar 'I:!Y. N � f1 r pi III lk :Ii llry I �► , II wine 11teNfiM ,�'' '��'� Y�j !' `' I J' iii. 1 ,4 k't v'V I; pfv "LL AE P'!40!rllli! :. �'� I 'I ,�I,NIt �' i I- I, �''f, 11. fil I ' '� •..,. I I Yl 1 1 1 t al ! I,' q I , 'I , c OF MIAP:.I Il �rt LOP co PR(jPPLANS RC -V M1J9)0l/. dib I I W r r,hu:waW •�W__.._. �l�l�'�_ ITS ��'� GROUND LEVEL WITH EXISTING STREET CONDITIONS I. I,< EDS Conceptual Grading Plan r!� PROPOSED LANDSCAPE DEVELOPMENT PLAN .'U', " : T , 'f —,'� S: T .` �;,T - low -'row-, M&A 41 1 iii 4ffl S P13 P J. •w7. —------- --' ! :L`7fr BE. bd ErPEET b ! � •iii• • a ( 4 �• .nn - ' ' LOT 1 ,.,.. IILOT ,/LOT U LOT ,t , 101 TT LOT la i • _ ( To, E DU PdNTEPLAA W b " _ pp }k �:. , TT .._.. ., j __ _ _.I._N PIAI Sb FADE<.�...,.nw.• _ '� i i S fi•—_.r--• YI "•` LOT , Lot a Lot a Lor 4 LOT s ; . Lor r 7 � rr, I MIMKYJlE - 1 �•+rn w ij � • , •148 - IY 1014 , • r �--------`-------� .�._ IT -_1_ 1 .1 _I ...b.E.S00TREET R/ _--,i - ---- I bl EPMr'JI� J r ', iliEL�C:��l I Y 1R i ;r„T1"� l'! I !III (I ! I'I"C 1-1 I 1 I I li l 1 I YYL'h, _ •� , =`�i. - J i " \;..i.;-� J , J, JY"!�= a ........ . - fi�il I " w M • �.. ., _L. ' '• OT Ta i la lOi ,1 ELOCMi - mi. _4�• �ljl n' I _ ...,..• . LOT a `+.......• — • ` LO7 , • " " ! LOr T ` ._ u •....+.�. _ : I I�-`•} — LOI �' 1019 ; . i Lm.•:•••'�'ra loll Lrr j'IOIS _. ; .:L ��. _-• ; a�,- • -� a is _ + � - T -0i ; ''` ��- ��-�' �i� ' -��- : �� a"i��.�� _ p I , • � - � DU F ~j r,a,,. ;��1��aT , :«1'Y :<�• ni J - J \:•p Y:r� - t"•tdiw�i - I ,i'�'i`ii«il a. IL �;+ •� _ ��',<; •,T � i • � I�`'�'�!I�FI I �I ISI f _. 1 -'� `-�s�.. a: •'r- " J .; - ._ - «:/q YRE EOOI qi WAYl=-JT1•• , `v _ _ ISI.. _ vs _ —_ __ — _ _._ _ —_ — . • • @._ n • B L O C H 1 1M01'0- . I bT s-ou- i ,HAC,•A• TWT e' DU PONT PLAZA DU PONT PLAZA DU PONT PLAZA pS, oa w p,i�n ?IR'?klnr;•r '! PuiBWKSC MGEi1 Pur8001L E0 PA0E TT +� LSF IfEARINO BOA - � N SITE SURVEY SCALE 1:10 f - --. .41ayOYV 1 UAI lip ,�ti 444i IN FIR) I- 0000000 hq (!0 'look Gq N Mi5l T.1m T;l m. 'A I I . I . . . Ste ql4i�, Qw Gems 31 10 rm Ilpa� ,Ar mi FA I lip PR6. MD GROUND ev. Goo KIN 8 REVIEW woft • D.I. kVELO RAM; I -MY -0 - UAI Y)r'R:0 00 �. __ pl„F,n1YM19u4Y� _ i 1 I I I .,r. -� � �,. .y. .,off• r yr.,•Lt, a {. n , 1.: I =I �' i„AsruYltw rAlM nwnr t.Y.� 7 IRI17N �♦ , 1. ti,�-r4, v F i f� TRACT D WEST TRACT D EAST 1 REIAII.rAFMIp k1a11N.lIlIAI IAAR,�G IIFM ill FFMFS MUD I,Li,O, Y.SIVIIWI ,NI AIW OD. , rM 0.OD I 1 9 I 96 TRACT E WEST TRACT E EAST TRACT ACC MACE AFrA1L,FACF A INN i uiis.115 _ cnr RSL�%7� ''Irlhi a� C. -. '.iF ! IEARINO BOA. •'-' IHIL SCALL PROPOSED FLOOR PLANS200 F I P LEVEL RETAaS: i.ry F.,prYra SCALE I'-JYL' wrowlortlouaxll j 34 u Ld q TRACT D WEST -TRACT D EAST --- —_ _–_ , __ _J 1 NI )IIx�1111.Y1NA141 AF! Il1ANNLVG 00 • F 7 77--7- TRACT TRACT BWEST LO"KAN RWALOAR�� m A TRACT 0 EAST A �mAm"VKX�s , rel V0FllEARlNGV0A. ilt p N RE Win. 2271 PODIUM FLOOR PLANS ALL BLOCRSK- A3' SCALE 1'-)V.O' v TRACT Dsi TRACT D CAS7 7" RAN , VENTA '1-11.111 QRST UNION TOWER & PLAZA JMCT C MT5 � 1D MMtS VIRAL Pt Mat D V 0 10rMq[AS7 um AWN VAj N4 S u �• w:rr +1 #eye. ,,,,elwu� •275■ swaaT aeur stun 400 .... ... ''.4RING Mf ,•-rie l J 64�i. I 111:111:1A 1. AL.1 LLut.l.0 � 1� I I11 SEWDFN IIAATLTJMFMNARRINNNII � •v ,.li��•, Ir ` MI 'I A°1EM1 LTAnafFM nexCATEn. �� II I ! ..I .. j I INMRanTDtA TWI[DW RI Me{.�pryp� I LYIUatANRFMfNALIMTAAITMNWn. T -r I. � I!I f11MFx IxI[°�LIIIN1AMIeM1YaaL� �/� ,INT[DYANDafL1AAY NfYDUR1 I�vrrownbw nAl10nMN DLL,']i_Il�ytl,IpngH[p ;n1 a all A ` : iiNDFAUBMV. ALINIMM m1 1111 11.E nAILL MI Ml Aa4*W1 - �1! ILS' RMI011 ANDRR(4TA1'onlaT. •I BULL �LRILL 't• x['ir'x�:amity °an nnrf f11P._ uunxw FRAYIq. mLr1 UmL-. I11 FFEWICO1 UH-AUFANUL t Mir[ flint . ISI la_IanouANn[wALLFAxFIt - I DD Tf mF V �� . If pnfTalnN: Lo°rw°wFA�nAxe . _ nn rF-Lanip (II �ID�_ IIIA [fAMMN°sLW NMAInD nrn �II Wi.[�m u•w: i MOOM wrmK FipAWrR _ WRAPNMYANT[MI[N !IFI QLLWLVlY[AiIW[E®I.00DAf '�ml r�f �� pAO�WµY nTM�Y�AT100� ' 11JIeL �� Ll[ILL.- fuROtiaNINTMAtttiMfN. ./ IIII tyl[aUNARpI0Af1[MOLY nn rT !m; aA[LLD YUMa[NAnAnuL Ili ISI ILAf4ALq.F,7ND[AI.. • , nn rf Il DD � aLIDIiMG ImrT �l—i II11 f1RLWALIp.RAG�.AN LDWA'D 1n1n'�11 MAIinpOnlAnf a"Catlt M�W}AT NQIRAN6. 1 • 1 _!m[, U� Cl.ml_ _ •., (��[wIL�AwFAF.lmrowwoox.°n. apt go as .I -.. r:rw nr eml^.0 on - ea .._ - �„� : TFICC OF NCARINO mrrT �� nmL 0, _-• ® �.� PLANS F. VIGV nitrtn n �� r, Dn . CY �.. I. r ", h,`r xo1W i:e10 — - 0B 11'I 00 _,. .M. mn • lir.` - p �Jy mil �� n nn 00 h7`d I_ffnO AN jai AI IB ■■ on o■ i i i I =� 1 .• 2271 1 /OURTN AWNUE f _ [10l7O10 TRALTC MI Ifl 11 LL.TNIRD 1 f� Ri�D.iCIpN[ IFI IFI I11� I� I IM[OV LIUAYNI IF� � L19CAYN[LOUI.LVARD iURDINC A6.1 f.[.fL[DND I I I TLATA I A1'SNUf 71ff.E.FOURT11fTNLET AVENU[ + SOUTHEAST FOURTH STREET ELEVATION .•x.x .• .. ., "..• " scALe 1: �o old dl t. -4 n MATERIAL I . WUUMAIMI CGY BYrL NA+UMY DM! ACRMLKOl3 A{I 111 wrALY SIflw.ulrn LYMAL rAMrwex nnw rlanr. DrAa . rurylraLDuuYB 11 rwmamNwua 111 rlHrmlrIIoiim A 11-ArOVrrwl - 'f1 LINA[rAWfrBrNl LA[RtlAffIYfLY. fALDI rum ANIIDLIL11IKW .A fA II; rrnAMLfxBnr,n rIm LYNAlIIraw ALWfNMMYUp 111 ILMAfttlx4l[IB1 11 F4x11NUwr1lrr IY) nwslWuuc ToaB III, fTA Itot Ym J IA41AI1fA■OUIU W111LYNAL -IS IIII UrrrM LYA .I. OIYRALB11gBC1A ULAUY1YriW YnA' T` tNmnIT144NIrU w (ANNA -mum Or[rA44[YSIVI l 111 uau.A.UIIIIMDUIYI rsrL+Aarn i 1111 IIA+NA rCLYD1 ND! fMIMRAMNLtlH! mrrsrn+LAYu Iul YDerAm.F.:.r,, - .^v': lxl sAT T-1rArxrAN J u IrwmANa.Allprta III mm r �; =;^ wgwtl. " IAM1 Ff AIFIM tUI II�L�•.BLY � rr: 7l;• IIE Now -_ ;IN ) j 98 _M IN 00 BB 80 _. 00 s; .4illt 11 tI 1114[f[CDNDAV[NU[BVILDIN4 '- I••' l•1 11lB.[.IOUdTII[TL[[T �fI BUICAVN[BOIM1[VABDWAV A6.2 SOUTHEAST SECOND AVENUE ELEVATION WA4E 1:70 • •• •• •. .. n. w, .. r. M... ' ufArliic,Ic���U ' I i � I I _.., all MATERIALS LEGEND _ 10 Ii'I LAx1YMrlo.AraNaxrrlAsmrwux ,I m 3w �1 m � —1 a xw Lt [[!STING [GILDING LISCAVNE LMREVA n ILap4 IlajAooJ �_ MATERIALS LEGEND pp Ii'I LAx1YMrlo.AraNaxrrlAsmrwux ,I m 3w �1 m � —1 a xw Lt 31 � RPOWL� ® j� : $ im, z SYYYN BIWAYTIL rLALA x[I'wIL•—.A Artnuc SOUTHEAST THIRD STREET ELEVATION SCALE I: 7G MATERIALS LEGEND Ii'I LAx1YMrlo.AraNaxrrlAsmrwux ,I oLn LwxxarLwsnunlAMlwxl AttnlrcaoLSAsaYlunn .F I LJ wrAarwarAArtnnwGLLLxaa tYNM IAM EP1 W I AIIMMM IMLaO. II uau noa,wAxu[LL [rxAL IAM FRtY11GODALlYM11w WUYRi III xNTFDUANalaLGlAi1 AEE[AIYI W. ' I L I lYGmlENrrLW wNE MLYr,IUWY ' 11'AIGYtIElYGI1COt. 'I .LAL NLLLLWII•AaIV[IwIW 11.GGIlAW1[iEIiYA 1'OWCT. "I WMI[1MA�IIMYIN[[ ALNIMM/LAMRtI. sInECASTnwnrn!Y•AILrAxels EI /MMINGEAMI.. WALL IAK". ' illi iLAlMllrllx'tpRW11 LInI[EAq. SII: slAMNNYLEAxax141EG METAL IAN0.WGIwY Y/IM tYNAF rAM fIMNI. r� ' IIl aLIM1EgEY!l AL lLV4EDIMAIAI , IYLMIALLIIM IIll LY1EAYIR IatAGF(IYIEIw r1rINM1ANY - swlmxon[NtnAslEuwxn. .. Iu rweNAAutoal Assnwr RAM of t1[II YE AxY - At~ IiA W RxG Y'lIN tlAt[LR E[MN i l —AMAIL CICLIw III rLALNA LC[Wu1 YY OrANPA 11 " I lI wa1mW11[mlFA snNe[lAll ' lrxKaLRfMLYf SII ,WEY'NY/, rLALA,.AM,IGIXNA �••• �^ ' III WAIMLWNEL[1R wti�r+r• IAVIIATELAT PMlI1ANEl ••"�" • III SENIfaANVALIWI WIrtGM111. ��• f[tEEM AMIIEYtIIYIMDY'wf0 �••• rAMil. Mr- 1 _R yp LL IlI I•I � m'mm -• m rn a ns s.e. rouxnl sTxe¢T ••-1rC Hot- 2171 A6.3 -MATERIALS LEGEND .k III ty 1+ IiI woomnDArrnarrwloswx I • I - ■ ■ ■ ■ � � � p ■ ovnluwlRrfumllnrAMr[ML I f pp ACRNTLOl01f A! pWCATl0. ® ■ B ■ O ® ■ III WAR IfYIrAM TWRDaLVNNIW ' _ ■ ® ■ � a � ■ ® [YNAIIAMIMIW AIARINNIM /MYpN. .$ ■ � ■ � ■. 9■� ■ ■ � III 7raulnar.NUNLwea»uPrAM rpnn rlalo A11Np11Y 1a11YRlf. l®®e {�� ®■1� �■1 ■ '.® .� B ■ - III TN(ImfMMIYL DInfi AssiwLR. . ■ ■ �+11� ^-!L`� ■ ■ ■ � B l 1WIIYlY1W11YOpAb IALU[TMNI! �. 4W l■l�[[ ■ ®r ® ®I ® . ® ■ a• AYnn{wux ciao!. lay B ■ B _■ m. ■ ,{� aYNAI IAMIMWALI11Ig111N lAllLq AffWILY. • � ® B ® � ■ ® ® aAN WAl1NIPAgYliPa{N �I . ■. ®I® ®-®_ ■ ■ ■ ■ ® ■ II lxrYalw LKIIIIrarlse YTIx [YNAI /pPN ®Yi I �Y ® m ® ® ■ ® ® ® ALUIIIMN11lAMN1a. il9 {9�[ f4 .{I rlUl'AflRpllt[n MALL IANRA. ■ ®l� •`• � . ■ ■ ■ ® B ® 9I NYIRIW aIANIE WAll1Ax[tf. ® ® m® ® M-19 Is■ B - 1{l EIwtINA1{AK'ANMNa IlfxptAN! ■ ®- ■ ® ® ® III 71ANI1WaffAN MIPArW CIS? ® Wx� '� ® ®' ■ B IN B ® IAN I -AL 4aW1111N W Nlrll tl'NAI IAMYWNN ® W ®® [/[:� � !q � Ip ■ Ill Cfll nw:fa{ifRl ATCOVEa!'a LIXICAAf B. ® ■•OR • WxLTAL fIIIM MDWIIII IYtOMI! ®® I 1 111 M B ® ■, m ® I/ YKIOiIL'flPNf llAfr/R IWI1fl1. B ■1® -.BI■ ®p ® ■ B ■. til OIf"Mf3lfRA AMD M.Y ® ® ■�® ® �! ■ B B AI.UWMMaIAN ILI . I ie®i [i!i MCKI.RfgNAlq gN[ARW. p is m III RAf11A lLLYNY[IlDIAMILy ® �:�-® ® ■ ■. ® ■ LUxYaRlIMWY ttallfUM II ®' ®1® ® ■ ®■ ■ Jul f1NEWAlia N.VAI,ANNLaaalA ® � I � � ■ ■. � ■ ® MAl[f MCNLaaNI'NNLY[R IAVFtf AT tA[t11AMl1 _ � ® _� ® s 1{I fEWr[Ax{M9IM IUMIWANIM ........ ••e •. ®Q ® mm77 ®I■ ■ yq '4 ■ ■ PAWL$AffWDroWpOawpW 8�® $1®■■B■■■��■ ®■A!a■■■dill®® ® ® ■_ Is ■,® ■ ■ ■ ® •� • .^•IC? O CIF I ICARINDOA':' ' O _._ ®_ B� ■ miss / roe's •Wo.—._ a+lle ✓.. . All 0 ® II �Id�l:. ■ 01 III M �®■��®Imm asp■■ CEO in an wn Emo meso ���d�q!■� m ®o OEM mo ®. A b B ■ 4. wlili . ■61-0 Il illi®B aTl Y[rOURTH fTP[R TMRPSCA I III MTNIRDSTII[R MPR UNION TOW[P 9.t f[CONO R[I NO • lISCAI;r[[OUL[YARDII'.AY IIII III {N30U'T mItAAYN[ I.. STR[R [UII.PINO BISCAYNE BOULEVARD ELEVATION !r! -r'+ !-1 ±-� f-,-- -it--s'" A6.4 SCALE I: 70 aa,Irxl[ is AL1 • w•.xu .1�. poI MATERIALS LEGEND i I I �s•�u�*'Iw�*,ra�n/� I�eiAwiiwu( 1 � 1 AITTNI WIMr Al NDKAIID. .� i 1• 1;. PnALT ArJIfIwMTamalAilNDa � ••.._.d..,. L1lNL rw W I iLY W .LLUNOMI nAYO(D. �'� 111 nawnLwlr,auwAaccrxAarwolr j1 :s. Iagll n%muuDlRRl muveu. p .p -W 1• i1NINUANou1DLAU AiluOLYs. p p � �� iwlnln+vLYmquawlgnuoLs ���1.�1Y�Y-1•L.11 m I.� p �w 1•AYWrIlxm111A0L kYNAR IAWf mYfNwLUlRlla �.. .LI WLIND AituRILY. TAIL f1YLLLL IYAgYl IINgx �-. FI IIIIY MllkEllt(AL' p1klT. I !!^■�� •�1� _,.. rYN.YxALNax AI.NINAa nAYRNL LTNILlIL1E YAlL lANkid � 1• lYklwff ,f1 rw.nllmuuMln YALLlANW- ' 11J� .w II'I k1Asf0LNLlc LDD/INDYugkANL i�r �� �� AA■■ _... VIII YETAd M4 NLWlINIm V _ VInILYNAR lAYTIIIIWI. 1�� ��� �� -.. � nl C61LLN1DOIIIYwf LYIVIUDLOgDIwI � " pILLTAL1NpMDNTn1IXRlY1R `.� AR / WAD1gY/AINi1N111NDAND 11 ISO �Il ... _... _ I Ml�I NAYRLYLIln AND ralYl. �. 17 In� LN4W WLDInL AL1n1aY �I.U1111RM [I.ADDaO Ym l ISO A OILrt INMADYMwLwClu4 I �� �� ��• II'I mNmLILrWY IIDM LAD H z IISO 1I .. . -u_ III) YDLMAV.LKALALAIOLDDtlA ' .. 1LLL717i -- —... vALuacaauomxnm rAvnlwruwrANet 1 ISI m0 mm ,i(j YYnwnrALogwquawnlc I/' pm 00 icYLDgnmLmmvaooY aro. ...._ _. �. mp °oo �Q: rll npe HBOno �o�m ill oo 1 oo 0p, W pp ISI 00 -.,'•r 1.c y�ME hRlN0 6WE onCA.• �ooa Rill 00 _.. r_- p no130 - •- 013 lisp 00 no slum to no �B 8_ YLPPMII - .. M ,...I • oo � ri iPi 'I _.. , y. mill e� I91 3 l i l iii -- 2271 •, TRACLc r �l ,1 LL.TIIILPMEET 'III 1 ACLDLA[L ;; LLLLCOND A6.5 YAI'� I III LL. fUURTHLiPLCT I II 111 i.[71110.0AVLNUL LUILDINC MEET SOUTHEAST THIRD AVENUE ELEVATION ;, ., ., .. _.._ SCALE 1:10 DY,�rxlc Mule IAYn L,I wcuul A•�,lll, nmuln Hw111eL Iv it r '. .11 IY Iw1,Lll I Iwr,LLn i I I Iwu.r I Lw,ua i I I.YJI[Lll I ; i IINI„'ll I rwuvu k,4 wlual ; OIL, 'U., �m 1 u t u;xwn ul xC7AIL6c W lblL ® � � MATERIALS LEGEND •. ®[am lwlnu !,I fllOomnDArarfuHr nuTa rwnx ., + I arA NAwHAr sursnAn rANrrrAxL �® �� I ,wlkLll ARRrt IbLDCf At Np['ARD.� , I IwuLR � 11 xnlA'`Rir Mn�rl rmlA�Oiwr° wA10rwnxD ® I I, ILi STOIW rCOor, DCANNIf kYHA1MM � ® ulnra rD[mn[m uuaHw ICA1M11l. ® 1 .wu.n .Ij nxrLDUAxnrwusf euomna twll,fL fl nl/Im ® WHNISH 01.Aft tAW{TUIMt iii �� D•AtDLwDmtxnoox 1 S ® I ILULLLtL '.f CYNN IAMIN{m ALUOlI•f �) tAxtNllAdrlYLY. vC wLDlutte arAwnr•riix ® � I _ Ilwu.0 noot AxotwutA rovecr. Ii. [xltA[ralartn[Tu[t 1"7� LwaILR M'Irx [rxAl11NW1 �. L•� AIIMMIMnAW10. �� I1rI111'u II NXWHNCYIIct WALLf 11 & I 'r Nxmlr00tAMIR rALL�AN[lL ® Hrlu.0 :,r Iuflwulc taaDlDflmwe. �.'a� ... Elm twlfvrL �� MUALNOi[AYDtl1l . ^rad ® Y67ALrANFLxo•rva. 1nTNXr FADLIn11nl Ir CYLLNOLTIr/C[t ATmVlAfpmOgAf �� �IallAltl MLfTALtTIW MDYDn•CTDIpt W UIItOrMIM t1lMniq AHD tn0D111 L'O101f r1AtRA rNIfH. it� ® lYuvlL 'Il LWtf1ANY 0/RAMWtRRAHO r m® Iwuvn [ARIIItIaAanIAtACItCt q. ®® L11111111 I WUY4 Ii I1wtW tCtlD VN[O rA DLII 3 LgINr®MId.IpmC101RMD ® �I I IwItLII Dollmm�Aflq , :ul slgWAlL,nAfAL AxDIaDpl ® I wuLn v,wuac«ueoaanen rAwtAr ULw rAxD. ®® �� __... IwlnR �If+ tf!•ICAtItIMOrt:DIOpArtxC H.vgaAmunroraoorNrD. I ®® wu.R rAAw. i Ywllv'IA - ' 1• II I I I Asrrt Q I I Ilar,kl W II I L.u,II. I ism I L9 ,�Il,rl I I I 1 P!AIA rllf l,f It Its r0Ux771A'ENUL PLAZA 'i�lll"111 Illlr 4 SOVF ISCAVN DIACAYNC BOULEVARD BUILDING N 0 1 IS. 10 a SO m 10 to ro IOD ISD 700 750 100 FF.eT , 0 11 16t.l U.1 1541L) 71.5 71.1 77.4 ]0.! O R A P H I C S C A L E u.D s•o AD.T n o Da.7 tl.f 1000 METCPS t ?liai O� HF..ARING BOA.2771 SOUTHEAST FOURTH STREET ELEVATION — EAST END "' n°°T 1 I•—S °= - A6.6 1 t 1 1 �f 13 I -L. - TI 1111D E, `_ it LB L; 1; LL 11 U 11 !1 I -LI:. UL D _-M 1. 1 1'1'7_ 111 13 Wi __.L: _'Ll _1J1L! U ILL- D--- VITJ K HBO Em m RS MATERIj ASYMfInIONt Ill I— MITI. 11' nua41S00f,B IIMNIIIIDAL ITTITIR)RAWN, II "lliTaTIvoll .r.mwITIIII Irl Kl BARAPI(I"I" R -W �"m 171 uTmwuom III mwall 10 —.-- lie' nAsto4earl WTALPAMI .mEta— GRUIEGY"IN it 4AODDII4W JI'l cu—mi "ITUPLIMI A umRl RACRIX SIM PUIMAKRJII nN3caeTa flu IT Ili fAVII 1161 TI,MvfSANSIA' L IT ."I 0 1 Is 30 \o 30 60 70 60 W IW ISO 200 20 300 I'vor 6o1'414ARING 2271 a IS 'A 9.1 Ii2 15.1 183 213 244 314 105 41.7 1 t 0 V;A Ill METERS ;,I-" V; GRAPHIC SCALE A6.7 SOUTHEAST FOURTH STREET ELEVATION - WEST END I L RS MATERIj ASYMfInIONt Ill I— MITI. 11' nua41S00f,B IIMNIIIIDAL ITTITIR)RAWN, II "lliTaTIvoll .r.mwITIIII Irl Kl BARAPI(I"I" R -W �"m 171 uTmwuom III mwall 10 —.-- lie' nAsto4earl WTALPAMI .mEta— GRUIEGY"IN it 4AODDII4W JI'l cu—mi "ITUPLIMI A umRl RACRIX SIM PUIMAKRJII nN3caeTa flu IT Ili fAVII 1161 TI,MvfSANSIA' L IT ."I 0 1 Is 30 \o 30 60 70 60 W IW ISO 200 20 300 I'vor 6o1'414ARING 2271 a IS 'A 9.1 Ii2 15.1 183 213 244 314 105 41.7 1 t 0 V;A Ill METERS ;,I-" V; GRAPHIC SCALE A6.7 SOUTHEAST FOURTH STREET ELEVATION - WEST END B t9 7r..R 1 II 11 E r 1 IJI rq Rst V V �!�7 rpt .II �� •� R■a■� _ � 41 --f— iii 0 �� U II ►how. - ,®d II r e Ing 'iii r iui .�.R.r Irl w to �_ �_,•- IB • IRu ' II r 6z Iri re r � I{rl.,� . i �1 ■ r HIS ep I■i N r 1{Ii � r ■ /rr l■1 r ,1� `. �. i. — r r --- imp.. ■ t m _ .. , ii�iiYl'II.MU11E3AfN1NnI1ti1:1itYSy��Si oii CmG C�i Eir u1i i7i I� ' E! r■ r' cj■■i"�IECp�{ri rpii SEI II rt ■ ■rr YO `r� R■ r■If { 1w 'car =_ „ -- ■,: • ■ -,a■. iV r,n■ r �! rl a .1■� h r ■ o..■ nn : 0 t•in `�� SOUTHEAST FOURTHSTREE BISCAV\E BOULEVARD WAI TRACT C SOUTHEAST T111111, E111EET 1 FOURTH STREET ILII] ',�?' 11. I�fl i?I IIt1LETHIWArVBENUESTRUH.mtlO III PISSSOUaTH ur 01 U 30 10 SD a0 10 to 9p 100 Iso 200 sfo foo FEST -71 r" t7i•M1:1Yti1 L.J u u V 1 i` FICE OF NEARING BOAAI•s?I �•' ITSI o Ls �a E1 u.1 n.f u.f H.1 f1. n.1 fors --� I PLANS REVIEW Ifl no b.7 11.0 taf 91.1 100.0 MkTER9 GRAPHIC SCALE r.••;; SOUTHEAST THIRD AVENUE ELEVATION _ A6.9 E. I � b 1 <. wl::ry•IY tppovY .. 5,^MOND IT.Vv TRARC S.E. T111" , 00CfaWKSTT OURTU AVENUE AVENUE rrAll. . .,A P117, SITE, SECTION FACING -NORTH. SCALE 1: �I n 7771 i 1. .. K M.UI -ARD BUILDING ............ L I IMITING0 WIRT S.E. RT HR. STAITRAcr LL FOURTH STAXIT RUSTING 111,01ING SECIINDSTRFEI III, R SEC.NO AVENUE 175SL TOMTII.,rmFF.r .1SCAYNE BOULEVARD WAV NUILDINC. SITE SECTION FACING EAST SCALE li 10 E II BEARING 00AFl.r-A Lt u r cvlr*