Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutR-02-0970J-02-702 9/11/02 RESOLUTION NO. 02— 970 A RESOLUTION OF THE MIAMI CITY COMMISSION AUTHORIZING THE DIRECTOR OF FINANCE TO ENABLE THE PAYMENT OF CLASS ACTION CLAIMS IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $667,550 TO POTENTIAL CLAIMANTS, INCLUSIVE OF ATTORNEYS FEES, IN SETTLEMENT OF ANY AND ALL CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY OF MIAMI RELATED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A PARKING SURCHARGE ON TOWED VEHICLES, FOR THE CASE OF ROBERT M. JASINSKI AND SUSAN M. MISAVAGE VS. CITY OF MIAMI, IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA, CASE NO. 02-21572-CIV-SEITZ, UPON EXECUTING A RELEASE FOR THE CITY OF MIAMI, ITS PRESENT AND FORMER OFFICERS, AGENTS AND EMPLOYEES FROM THE CERTAIN STATED CLAIMS AND DEMANDS; ALLOCATING FUNDS FROM THE SELF- INSURANCE AND INSURANCE TRUST FUND, ACCOUNT CODE NO. 001000.026147.4.699. WHEREAS, Robert M. Jasinski and Susan M. Misavage filed a claim and lawsuit on behalf of themselves and other similarly situated members of their class against the City of Miami, in the U.S. District Court of the Southern District of Florida, Case No. 02-21572-CIV-SEITZ, Miami, Florida; and WHEREAS, the above claim and lawsuit have been investigated by the Tort Committee of the City Attorney's Office and the Division of Risk Management pursuant to Section 18-232 of the Code of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended, which created the QTY Comas-SioN MEET= 6F S E F 1 1 2002 Rei;alution No. 02— 970 City of Miami's Self -Insurance and Insurance Trust Fund and recommend that the claim and lawsuit be settled for an amount not to exceed $667,550 for potential claimants, inclusive of attorneys fees; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. The recitals and findings contained in the Preamble to this Resolution are adopted by reference and incorporated as if fully set forth in this Section. Section 2. The Director of Finance is authorized to enable the payment of class action claims in an amount not to exceed $667,550 to potential claimants, inclusive of attorneys fees, in settlement of any and all claims and demands against the City of Miami related to the imposition of a parking surcharge on towed vehicles, for the case of Robert M. Jasinski and Susan M. Misavage vs. City of Miami, in the District Court of the Southern District of Florida, Case No. 02-21572-CIV-SEITZ, upon the execution of a release releasing the City of Miami, its present and former officers, agents and employees from the certain stated claims and demands, with funds allocated from the Self -Insurance and Insurance Trust Fund, Account Code No. 001000.026147.4.699. Page 2 of 3 02- 970 Section 3. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its adoption and signature of the Mayorll. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 11th day of September , 2002. MANUEL A. DIAZ, ATTEST: 09 PRI04CILLA A. THOMPSON CITY CLERK :APPROVED O FO AND CORRECTNESS �L*,"' JAND VILARELLO CITY TORNEY 58:tr:MJC:BSS �i If the Mayor does not sign this Resolution, it shall become effective at the end of ten calendar days from the date it was passed and adopted. If the Mayor vetoes this Resolution, it shall become effective immediately upon override of the veto by the City Commission. Page 3 of 3 02-- 970 CITY OF NIIANII CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and Members of the City commission FROM: Alejandro Vilarello, City Attorney DATE: September 4, 2002 RE: City Commission Meeting — September 11, 2002 Settlement Proposal: Parking Surcharge Towing Case City of Miami adv. Robert M. Jasinski U.S. District Court No. 02 -21572 -CIV -Seitz (J-02-702) CA -26 The attached resolution will authorize settlement of a class action lawsuit, originally filed in Miami -Dade Circuit Court, which sought a declaratory judgment that the City's parking surcharge ordinance does not apply to motor vehicles impounded and stored at towing company storage facilities in the City. The basis for plaintiffs' claims is that owners and operators of impounded vehicles do not fall within the definition of "Patron" as set forth in the City's parking surcharge regulations and that towing company storage yards are not "open for use to the general public" as defined by the Ordinance and the parking surcharge statute. The action also sought an injunction against the City, ordering it to cease collecting the parking surcharge at tow lots. Before a negotiated settlement was finalized, the Plaintiff voluntarily dismissed the case in state court and refiled it in federal court, adding claims related to the administrative fee of $25.00 that the city collects pursuant to its tow agreements. This resolution settles the surcharge portion of the lawsuit. The settlement would agree to certify the class of payors as those who paid the surcharge on cars that were towed. The maximum amount the City of Miami would be required to have available for this settlement would be $667,550. The settlement will only require the City to refund the Surcharge to those who actually file a claim after receiving a notice. Further, the settlement would require the City to stop collecting the Surcharge for storage on towed vehicles. The City of Miami would agree to an attorney fee not to exceed 30% of the recovery, to be determined by the court and to be paid from this amount. •, The City Attorney's Office, the Risk Management Division, and outside counsel have investigated and evaluated this case and have approved the recommendation of this settlement. Funds not to exceed $667,550, are available for this settlement from the Self -Insurance and Insurance Trust Fund, Index Code No. 515001.624401.6.661. W756:MJC:bss cc: Carlos A. Gimenez, City Manager Elvi G. Alonso, Agenda Coordinator 0- 970