HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem #67 - Discussion ItemSTREET AND ALLEY VACATIONS
DISCUSSION ITEM
ISSUES
Pz 10
• Vacations of streets and alleys can have profound impacts on the function and
appearance of the entire city.
• The City has routinely approved most applications for vacations of streets and alleys
with little scrutiny given to the long-term implications of the vacation.
• Implications of vacations are often not apparent. For example, vacating a street or
alley can create a mega -block that allows a building that is out of character with the
height, bulk and scale of the surrounding neighborhood. Vacations can encourage
the demolition of small-scale historic buildings on the property.
• Applications to vacate streets and alleys are increasing.
• There is little clear benefit to the public by the vacation of streets and alleys under
the present system of review. In many cases, in fact, vacation harms the public.
CURRENT PROCESS
• Applications are filed with the Public Works Department and are reviewed by the Plat
and Street Committee, which considers the criteria set forth in Section 55-15 (c) of
the Miami City Code.
• The applicant is not required to submit information about the proposed use of the
street or alley or an analysis of the impact and benefit to the public.
• Once the Plat and Street Committee makes a recommendation, vacations are
reviewed by the Zoning Board. The City Commission may approve or deny the
vacation.
RECOMMENDATIONS - GENERAL
• The City should adopt a policy that actively discourages street and alley vacations,
and encourages more rigorous review with a design -based framework.
• Vacation requests should be treated as the exception and not the rule, and
applicants should be required to make a solid case for vacation.
• Prior to review by the Plat and Street Committee, each proposal to vacate a street or
alley should be evaluated on two sets of criteria: 1) the functional and urban design
implications for the surrounding nine -block area, and 2) the public benefits that
would be provided.
z
1
• City vacation policies should acknowledge that a negotiated set of public benefits is
intrinsic to any approval and mitigation of impacts alone is not enough. Instead, the
potential merits of a proposed vacation must demonstrate significant long-term
benefit to the public to justify the vacation.
• Public benefits must exceed those the applicant would have provided without a
vacation request, must outweigh the loss of public right of way created by the
vacation and must constitute true PUBLIC benefit.
• Benefits might include a rededication of an improved street or alley back to the City,
public open space, streetscape improvements, bicycle paths, affordable housing,
historic preservation, etc.
• A consistent set of criteria would help ensure thorough and thoughtful assessment of
vacations by those charged with their review. Applicants would benefit also by
having a clearer and more predictable sense of what is important to the City.
• The City may wish to consider exceptions for single family and duplex
neighborhoods. A new mechanism permitting temporary closures of improved alleys
with 100% consent of all property owners could be instituted.
RECOMMENDATIONS -DESIGN CRITERIA
The Planning and Zoning and Public Works Departments have begun to develop a set of
design criteria, which cover a full range of functional and urban design concerns, to guide
the review and analysis of vacation proposals.
I. Impact Analysis
■ Urban Design - Is the vacation advisable given urban design impacts? What does an
urban design analysis of the surrounding nine -block area reveal?
■ Community Support - Is there specific support for the vacation in a neighborhood
plan or is there some other form of demonstrated local need?
■ Function - Is the existing street and alley grid intact or already broken? How well
does the existing alley or street perform? What are impacts to the long-term
flexibility of the transportation network?
• Consequence - What might be the 10 year consequence of the vacation for the City?
• Options - Are there other options to a full vacation that might work and preserve use
of the street or alley?
• Services - Is the alley needed for utilities, loading, access to parking or other
services? Might it be in the future? How would these needs alternatively be served?
■ Light, View and Air - What is the impact on views, light and air?
■ Access - Does the street provide access to the bay or the river?
■ Height, Bulk and Scale - What are the resultant changes in height and bulk on the
block? What is the impact on the form and orientation of buildings on the block
relative to surrounding blocks? �y)
2
II. Analysis of Public Benefit as Proposed by Applicant
■ Open space - Is it in optimal location and of good quality? Does it feature through
block connections and other linkages to existing sidewalks?
■ Public use - Is it clearly open and welcoming to the public? Is it accessible at all
times of day?
■ Streetscape amenities - Do they comply with the City's urban design guidelines
and/or guidelines established by neighborhood plans?
■ Neighborhood benefits - Do they respect the neighborhood's character? Do they
offer public features beyond those already required or those being used to qualify for
other kinds of development bonuses? Do they offer an improvement to existing
conditions and are they better than what would result in as -of -right development?
Do they fulfill localized benefits desired by a community or neighborhood? Do they
enhance the identity of the neighborhood?
■ Historic preservation - Does it recognize and reinforce City regulations or
recommended policies? Does it incorporate a City designated historic site?
■ Bulk and scale - Does it avoid outcomes that would change the bulk and scale of the
area? Would additional FAR accrue to the proponent?
• Public benefits - Are they any better than those the applicant would have provided
anyway? Are they better than the net loss of public right-of-way created by the
vacation? Are they truly PUBLIC?
NEXT STEP
• If directed by the City Commission, the Planning and Zoning and Public Works
Departments will refine the above -listed criteria and develop procedures to
Implement the new policy.
• The Departments will prepare the necessary amendments to the Miami City Code for
adoption by the City Commission.
6.,