HomeMy WebLinkAboutM-02-0436CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA
INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM
70 : The Honorable Mayor and DATE : n„ FILE
Members of the Commission APR - 1 2u~~
sus~ECT : Annual Oral Reports by
City CommitteesBoards
FROM. eneZ REFERENCES:
Clty Man er ENCLOSURES:
Pursuant to code Sec. 2-892, the following City of Miami Boards is scheduled to make their oral
presentations before the City Commission on April 11, 2002:
• CO1~ZN[UNITY RELATIONS BOARD
• CULTURAL AND FINE ARTS BOARD `~
• HEALTH FACILITIES ADVISORY BOARD
• ffiSTORIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL PRESERVATION BOARD
• WATERFRONT ADVISORY BOARD
• MIANII SPORTS AND EJ~ITION AUTHORITY BOARD
CAG/KRDS
02- 436
Cat#g .a~ ~t~mt
ADA ROJAS
Chairperson
January 14, 2002
Mr. Carlos Gimenez
Office of the City Manager
City of Miami
444 S.W. 2°d Avenue
Miami, Florida 33130
Dear Mr. Gimenez:
~~~r' oF,y
Z~ X93
nuu unu •
7G~C uw r~O~`~
CITY MANAGERS OFFICE
lye ~~~ I ty ~~ I~AONDRA FRANKEL
Vice-Chairperson
Pursuant to the City Code Sec.2-890 this report is being submitted to you.
Attached please find a copy of the City of Miami's Community Relation's Annual
Report for the year 2001.
If you have any questions in regards to this report or its contents, please call me at
(305) 898-1760.
Sin -
Ada Maria Ro
Chairperson
Cc: Community Relations Board Members
COMMUNITY RELATIONS BOARD / C/0 City Manager's OfFice
444 S.W. 2nd Avenue, 10th Floor/Miami, Florida 33130/(305) 416-2010
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 330708/Miami, Florida 33233-0708
02- 436
CITY OF MIAMI
CO RELATIONS BOARD
ANNUAL REPORT FOR THE YEAR 2001
Pursuant to City Code Sec.2-890 this report is being submitted to the City Manager.
The City of Miami Community Relations Board (CRB) has been active since its
inception in March 1999 and meets-every month to review and discuss various
ethnic and racial issues affecting our community. The CRB 'was created to foster
mutual understanding, tolerance and respect among all economic, social, religious
and ethnic groups in the City of Miami.
Over the past year the CRB has made written recommendations to Commissioners,
the previous City Mayor, as well as to the City of Miami Police Chief regarding
maintaining harmony in the community during times of crisis and during peaceful
times. Responses to the required questions as follows:
1. Whether the board is serving the purpose for which it was created?
For a nascent Board, the CRB has begun to succeed in gaining the much needed
visibility and recognition in order to function effectively. To this end, the CRB has
been successfully developing the means of becoming a vehicle of dialogue and
interactions between all groups in the City.
2. Whether the board is serving current community needs.
As stated above, the CRB was created "to foster, mutual understanding, tolerance
and respect, among all economic, social, religious and ethnic groups in the City of
Miami." Prioritizing the facilitation of greater harmony and understanding among
its residents inherently engenders a forum where concerns can be voiced. The CRB
has begun to serve in that capacity, first, by its mere presence and secondly by its
participation in community matters. - ~- .: -
3, A list of the board's major accomplishments.
During 2001, the CRB has been involved with the crises of police shootings and
served to ameliorate the potential for violence. Daring the months of Apn7 through
September the CRB has been involved in various meetings and proc~cdnres taking
place snrronndiog the shooting of Nick Singleton. The concept of the Civ~ian
Investigative Panel (C~) was developed based on the community's demand as a
response to this crisis. The CRB has had a presence and participated in the
meetings of the coalition of community-based organizations drawing np the
p2-- 436
proposed Charter change and the Ordinance for the creation of the CIP. Further
efforts will continue in this volatile area. The CRB bas strived to develop a close
relationship with the City of Miami Police Department. The Police Department has
welcomed the CRB's involvement in many community activities. The CRB
underwent a special training session provided by the Police Department, in order to
gain better understanding of the current shooting policies and procedures. This has
enabled the Board to better respond to community concerns and needs.
The Board has also cooperated in conjunction with the Miami Dade Community
Relations Board Crisis Response Team during a Haitian Community protest in
order. to facilitate mediation during this tense period.
During the month of August The City of Miami Beach requested our assistance and
participation in the newly created "Friendship Ambassadors Program" Aad we
were instrumental in helping to avert potential racial conflict which may have
reflected and impacted negatively for our tourist industry and overall image. Also
in Miami Beach the CRB played an instrumental role with the "Friendship
Ambassador Program" in maintaining harmonious relationships among all
participants of this event. This was a concert that NSYNC performed was a
charitable event whose proceeds went to benefit the victims of the tragic September
11 events.
During the last months of the year the CRB participated and organized toy drives
for different areas of the City of Miami. Many disadvantaged and abused and
neglected children were able to rejoice at receiving the toys donated through the
efforts.
4. Whether there is any other board, either public or private, which would
better serve the functions of the board.
The CRB is distinct and mandated to serve a different function from other Boards
in the City of Miami. Continued growth and gain in recognition for the critical need
of a vehicle for fostering greater harmony and understanding in the community wiU
continue. The Board consists of members who possess an outstanding civic
reputation as well as being a highly diverse board of professional individuals. The
members are enthusiastic, dedicated, and bard working individuals whabring with
them unique ezperiences in dealing with the racial and ethnic needs of this
community.
5. Whether the ordinance creating the board should be amended to better
enable the board to serve the purpose for which it was created.
The ordinance responsible for creating the board should amend Article 3 Number
13 which states that:
2
02- ~3G
At all times the Board and its committees shall operate in accordance with the
Government in the Sunshine Act.
The same ordinance states in Article 3 Number 4 that the Board is:
To attempt to act as conciliator in controversies involving community relations.
The Board is at times limited by its obligation to operate under guidelines of the
Government in the Sunshine Act because the Board is called upon in time of crisis
when it is not always feasible to communicate with the liaison during an urgency of
the matter at hand. The potential for violent confrontation between different
groups in amulti-ethnic community is ever present, especially since there are deep
divisions separating each other into divergent factions. The Etian Gonzalez
demonstrations and riots illustrate how lack of understanding and respect for each
other's cultures and interests can result in violent confrontations. A community
forum for dialogue to foster is essential to this end, the CRB has been limited
because we lack of full time permanent staff to operate an office to carry out critical
daily functions and to be readily available to community members and
organizations on an as needed basis. It behooves the current administration to
consider the need to amend the ordinance for the CRB and create an Office of
Community Relations, initially staffed with a Director, two community relations
Specialist and clerical assistance.
6. Whether the board's membership requirements should be modified.
At the present time the board's membership's requirements fulfill the needs of the
Board and do not need to 6e modified. However, there are vacancies on the board
that have not been filled during the year. This has caused a major disadvantage in
the success of attaining the full potential of the board.
7. The cost, both direct and indirect, of maintaining the board."
The services that the board renders to the citizens of the City of Miami outweigh the
costs that the City of Miami incurs. The board is in need of additional funds to meet
the growing needs and demands of the City of Miami. Article 3 Number 5 states:
,~;.. -
To cooperate in the development of educational and social programs dedicated to
the elimination of discrimination of any form and improvement of community
relations with, and to enlist the support of civic leaders, civic, religious, veterans,
labor, industrial, commercial and charitable groups in addition to private groups or
agencies also devoted to and engaged in the inculcation of ideas of tolerance, mutual
cultural respect and understanding.
Article 3 Number 6 states:
3
02- 436
To initiate studies and have said studies made, in field of community relations;
Prepare and disseminate reports of such studies to the City Commission.
The Board is currently funded 540,000 on an annual basis from the City of Miami
General Funds account. The board is unable to fully accomplish its functions with
the limited budget. The City of Miami residents would be more receptive to such
programs, which would assist in the elimination of discrimination if the programs
were at no cost to the citizens. The board is also required to initiate and complete
studies in the field of community relations. The initial recommended salaries for the
Director $45,OpQ, two Community Relations Specialist $30,000 and clerical
assistance at 52Z,Q00. The current recommendation is a for a more effective and
realistic active $pd working board. -
4
n~- ~~b
CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA
INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM
T~ ~ Carlos A. Gimenez Da,rE ` January 15, 2002 FILE
City Manager
~ sua,ECr : 2002 Annual Report
FROM : Tereslta L. Fernandez, RA, AICP REFERENCES
Executive Secretary, Planning and Zoning
Department, Hearing Boards Division ENCLOSURES:
Pursuant to City Code Section 2-890, attached are the 2002 annual reports for the
following boards, pending signatures of the chairpersons:
• Code Enforcement Board
• Cultural and Fine Arts Board
• Nuisance Abatement Board
• Planning Advisory Board
• Zoning Board
Should you have any questions, please contact me at 305-416-1488.
c: Ana Gelabert-Sanchez, Director
Planning and Zoning Department
02- 436
~: [ri
~N.,Q ~.. ti t1 .JS:{!
CULTURAL AND FINE ARTS BOARD
ANNUAL REPORT 2001
The Cultural and Fine Arts Board (C&FAB) was established October 1998 and
transferred to the Office of Hearing Boards on December 1999. It was created to
make recommendations and guide the City Commission in its determination as to
whether any art shall be accepted or acquired by the City Commission; to seek
and encourage public participation in all cultural and fine arts events; to attract art
programs of other governmental, private or public agencies to the City; to
coordinate and originate cultural activities within the City. To qualify community
events as being officially recognized; to establish a Miami Art Museum and such
branches as are necessary, subject to approval of the City Commission; to
recommend acquisition of works of art by the City to be used and made available
for the cultural betterment of the City of Miami; to appoint artists or other
knowledgeable individuals as honorary board members, who shall advise and
assist the board in the furtherance of its duties.
Is the board serving current community needs?
Yes. The board has acted in a professional and honorable manner in proceeding
to meet the needs of local, national and international artists in its pursuit to
promote and improve cultural activities within the City.
A list of the board's major accomalishments•
• Gave proclamation to various individuals.
• Supported, "Of Hope, Courage and Justice: A Global Mosaic of Women in
Human Rights" by Amy Sen'ano. ~ ~"'`
Is there anv other board either aublic or private, which would better serve
the function of the board?
No.
~~-- 436
Should the ordinance creatinct the board be amended to'better enable the
board to serve the auraose for which it was created?
No.
Should the board's membershia requirements be modified?
No.
Should you need further information, please contact me through the Planning
and Zoning Department, Hearing Boards Division at 305-416-'1480.
Sincerely,
Tony Wagner
Chairperson
Respectfully submitted this day of January 2002.
~~ ~
1#~iTER-GFFICE 141Ei~lORA~i!~U~'
Carlos A. Gimenez
City Manager
_ Deana Lee onso, Chairperson
City of IVtiami, Florida
Health Facilities Authority
Healtl: Facilities Authority
Board Annual Report
Code Sec. 2-890-892
Please find below the Annual Report required by City Code Sec. 2-890 concerning the Health
l;aciluies Authority Board:
a) The City of Miami, Florida, Health Facilities Authority serves its purpose by assisting health
facilities in the acquisition, construction, financing and refinancing of hospital projects.
b) The board's interest to better serve the community is demonstrated as such needs arises.
c) We believe our community continues to benefit by the financing transactions the Authority
has approved in the past.
d) This board was created by Chapter 74-323, Laws of Florida, Acts of 1974, Chapter 154,
Florida Statutes, Part III specifically to assist health facilities.
e) The Authority is not recommending any amendments to the ordinance at this point.
f) Presently, no membership requirements should be modified.
g) The Authority did not incur any expenses, neither direct nor indirect.
If you have any question please call Pete Chircut at 416-1945.
U2- 436
CITY OF MIAMI HISTORIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL PRESERVATION BOARD
c/o Sarah Eaton, Preservation Officer
Planning and Zoning Department
P.O. Box 330708
Miami, FL 33233-0708
February 11, 2002
Mr. Carlos Gimenez
City Manager
P.O.Box 330708
Miami, FL 33233-0708
Re: ANNUAL REPORT -HISTORIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL PRESERVATION BOARD
Dear Mr. Gimenez:
The Historic and Environmental Preservation Board is pleased to present this annual report in satisfaction
of City Code Section 2-434, specifically responding to the following questions:
A. WHETHER THE HISTORIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL PRESERVATION BOARD IS SERVING THE PURPOSE FOR
WHICH IT WAS CREATED.
The Historic and Environmental Preservation Board (HEPB) issues Certificates of Appropriateness
for exterior alterations to designated historic buildings and issues Certficates of Approval for
construction activity and tree removal in environmental preservation districts and scenic
transportation corridors. The Board also designates historic buildings and historic districts
(neighborhoods) based on criteria set forth in the Historic Preservation Ordinance.
B. WHETHER THE HISTORIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL PRESERVATION BOARD IS SERVING CURRENT COMMUNITY
NEEDS.
The HEPB is responsive to community needs by monthly addressing petitions for construction
activity in historic sites and districts, environmental preservation districts and scenic transportation
corridors, balancing the need for progress with the need to preserve Miami's heritage. The Board
also responds to requests by neighborhood associations for historic district designation.
C. A LIST OF THE HISTORIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL PRESERVATION BOARD'S MAJOR ACCOMPLISHMENTS
During 2001, the HEPB held 11 meetings and one workshop and reviewed the foll,~owing:
• 63 Cert~cates of Appropriateness for historic structures.
• 19 Certificate of Approval for construction activity in an environmental preservation district.
• 1 Historic Site designation.
• 3 Preliminary Historic Site designations.
• 1 National Register nomination.
• Proposed amendment to the Historic Preservation Ordinance to give the HEPB the authority to
deny demolition.
D. WHETHER THERE IS ANY OTHER BOARD, WHETHER PUBLIC OR PRNATE, WHICH WOULD BETTER SERVE THE
FUNCTIONS OF THE HISTORIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL PRESERVATION BOARD.
At its meeting of December 16, 1993, the City Commission passed Resolution 93-766, establishing
the City Boards and Committees Review Committee (CBCRC) to evaluate the performance and
02- 436
effectiveness of each existing City Board and Committee and to make recommendations regarding
the continuation, abolishment or consolidation of these Boards and Committees. The CBCRC
presented its report, which among other recommendations, recommended that the Urban
Development Review Board (UDRB) and Historic and Environmental Preservation Board (HEPB) be
merged. At its meeting of March 24, 1994 the City Commission passed Resolution 94-129 asking
the City Attorney's Office to conduct a careful review of the Ordinances creating the UDRB and the
HEPB in order to accomplish the merger of the two boards. At the City Commission meeting of
September 22, 1994, the study evaluating pros and cons of the proposed merger of the UDRB and
the HEPB, prepared jointly by the City Attorney's Office and the Planning, Building and Zoning
Department, was presented, along with the necessary legislation to create a merged board by
combining the purposes, powers and duties of both boards. The study was discussed, and the
proposed merger was denied unanimously by Motion 94-712. Thus, after careful consideration the
City Commission has concluded that it is in the best interest of the community to maintain the UDRB
and the HEPB as separate entities. No other board can better serve the functions of the HEPB.
E. WHETHER THE ORDINANCE CREATING THE BOARD SHOULD BE AMENDED TO BETTER ENABLE THE BOARD
TO SERVE THE PURPOSE FOR WHICH IT WAS CREATED.
It is believed that the current composition of the Board, representing a blend of architectural and
landscape architectural expertise, historical interests and citizen members represents a broad
constituency of historical and environmental groups as well as a broad spectrum of the community.
F. WHETHER THE BOARD'S MEMBERSHIP REQUIREMENTS SHOULD BE MODIFIED.
The Board's membership requirements are necessarily broad in order to encompass the technical
expertise and historical and environmental interests outlined in response to "e" (above). One of the
positions on the Board, however, is real estate broker, and it has been extremely difficult to fill this
position. It therefore may be advisable to change the category to real estate professional.
G. THE COST BOTH DIRECT AND INDIRECT OF MAINTAINING THE BOARD.
There are no direct costs.
Indirect costs arise because of staff assigned to the Board. These staff members are not assigned
exdusivety to the Board but also have other responsibilfies. Indirect costs are estimated at
$29,136.26 (see attachment).
Thank you for this opportunity to present this report.
Sincerely,
.~~
,~,r~-Rei Fernandez _
Chairperson ~ - "` '
Attachment
2
~~ --
HISTORIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL PRESERVATION BOARD
INDIRECT COSTS
INTAKE
Preservation Officer
Typist Clerk III
Fringe benefits = 30°k estimated
Subtotal
HEARING
Preservation Officer
Typist Clerk III
Deputy City Attorney
20 hrs. x $38.58 x 12 mo.
6 hrs. x $1526 x 12 mo.
_ $ 9,259.20
_ $ 1.098.72
$ 10,357.92
_ $ 3.107.38
_ $ 13,465.30
4 hrs. x $38.58 x 12 mo.
4 hrs x $15.26 x 12 mo.
3 hrs. x $62.26 x 12 mo.
Fringe benefits = 30°k estimated
Subtotal
FOLLOW-UP
Preservation Officer _ 10 hrs. x $38.58 x 12 mo.
Fringe benefits = 30% estimated
Subtotal
MISCELLANEOUS
Advertising
Copy/Reproduction $150.00 x 12 mo.
Subtotal
TOTAL
3
_ $ 1,851.84
_ $ 732.48
_ $ 2.241.36
$ 4,825.68
_ $ 1.447.70
$ 6,273.38
_ $ 4,629.60
_ $ 1.388.gg
_ $ 6,018.48
_..~ .:
_ $ 1,579.10
_ $ 1.800.00
_ $ 3,379.10
_ $ 29,13626
02- 436
~t~~J O ~ ~t~tri~t
WATERFRONT ADVISORY BOARD
To~ The Honorable Mayor, Members of the
Commission and City Manager
From= Robert Parente
Chairman, Waterfront Advisory Board
Re~ 2001 Waterfront Advisory Board Annual Report
The following is the report of the City of Miami's Waterfront Advisory Board, per City Code
Sec. 2-890.
The Waterfront Advisory Board (WAB) is responsible for reviewing and evaluating all plans
and issues relating to the use and development of City owned waterfront property. We
provide advice to the City Commission concerning such issues we also work closely with
the City Manager and his staff.
Following are some of the highlights of the year 2001.
COCONUT GROVE
Anchorage/Dinner Key Marina/Exhibition Center
- The Anchorage Committee of the WAB hosted a tour of the waterfront for the City
Manager, senior staff, the Chief of Police and his senior command staff.
- Along with the city manager, we have commissioned a study of the anchorage areas
of the Grove waterfront. The study group, operating under the name of the
Technical Assistance Team, is comprised of over 30 individuals, representing a wide
range of marine industry and recreational- expertise. Don Keirn, Environmental
Specialist, Dept of Environmental Protection, State of Florida, heads up the team,
which is divided into 8 committees. A comprehensive study is due to be submitted in
April, 2002.
- When completed and distributed, the next step will be for the WAB to convene a
series of public meetings, reminiscent of the effort to study the future of
Bicentennial Park. The ideal result will be a comprehensive master plan that
incorporates the future use of, and integration of the Exhibition Center, the Marina,
the Coconut Grove Sailing Club, city leased properties and the adjacent city parks.
CITY OF MIAMI WATERFRONT ADVISORY BOARD ~ `~
do Miami Convention Center / 400 S.E. 2nd Avenue Miami, Florida 337 30 / (305) 579-6341 /Fax: (305) 372- ,~9
This year, the WAB hosted public forums and meetings on such topicl as~
- The Olympic Sailing Center in Kennedy park,
- The removal of derelict vessels;
- Dredging of the Dinner Key basin and channels,
- The finalizing of improvements to the Seminole Boat ramp,
- The status of the capital improvements and programs at Shake-A-Leg, and the
YMCA.
- The ongoing saga that is the project known as Grove Harbour Marina.
At the very least, we provide a forum for interested citizens to be seen and heard, and
become involved in the issues that effect their waterfront.
VIRGINIA KEY
We held meetings regarding the future use of the Marine Stadium; in November, members
of the City's department of Real Estate and Economic Development made a presentation to
the WAB. The presentation covered existing uses of the land, possible re-zoning of some
areas and current condition of the structures on the site. A future meeting is planned.
Members of the WAB pushed for the creation of a master plan for all of Virginia Key before
any rezoning takes place.
Recently, we listened to a presentation on the use of the property commonly referred to as
the Rowing Club. As a result, the WAB recommended that the Commission support the
proposed lease between the City and Barry College for their continued operation of a
training center for their students, as well as for students from local high schools.
WATSON ISLAND
At Watson Island, the WAB, which has always supported the development of a Mega-Yacht
marina on the island, carefully monitored the RFP process and resulting public meetings. I
served on the selection committee and as the liaison between the WAB and that committee.
We also have been actively monitoring the on going development of the Aviation and
Visitor's Center, the Children's Museum and improvements to the Watson boat ramp.
MIAMI RIVER
In July, we heard from the Miami River Coordinating Committee. We have always
supported their on going efforts to restore the river to its past glory. On this particular
night, we heard the final plans of the project known as the Miami River Greenway Plan,
and passed a motion supporting its adoption by our City Commission.
MISCELLANEOUS
In order to stay on "the same page", we held a joint meeting with the City's Parks Advisory
Board. Several city parks are also waterfront property, so we have overlapping interests.
Several smaller break out meeting are occurring, with more in the future to continue
promoting projects and ideas of a mutual interest.
Q~~` ~~
The WAB also heard from, and worked with
- The Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission
- The Army Corp of Engineers
- Managers of the City's marinas
- The City of Miami Marine Patrol
FUTURE OUTLOOK
The next year is certainly going to be a busy one for the WAB. In addition to our regular
monthly meetings, we will
- Conduct a series of public meetings regarding the future of the Grove waterfront.
These meetings will commence when the Technical Assistance Team concludes its
study and submits its final report.
- Begin a similar process for the Virginia Key area, primarily the Marine Stadium
site.
- Monitor the development of both the Grove Harbour and the Island Gardens
projects, and keep an eye on the progress of the YMCA and Shake-a-Leg ventures.
SLTNIIVIARY
These are just some of the highlights of a very hard working team of people, proud to serve
you and the citizens of our great city. Though only mandated to meet once a month, your
Waterfront Board is now meeting twice a month, with the second meeting being a "think
tank" session for board members, city staff and the public.
I'm proud to say that in all of our formal 12 meetings last year, we always had a quorum,
and we accomplished all of this with almost no cost to the city. We are blessed with the
service of a most dedicated city employee, Ms. Yvonne Page, who serves as our city liaison.
I dare say she is the hardest working liaison in the city, frequently working above and
beyond the scope of her regular duties to see that we have what we need to accomplish our
tasks. A tip of the hat also goes to her immediate supervisor, Ms. Christina Abrams, who is
quite generous in the time she allows Ms. Page to spend on our behalf.
In closing, please keep in mind that your appointees to the WAB are your de-facto
legislative aides on issues regarding City waterfront land we are the bridge between public
input and your respective offices. As our city waterfront land is a most precious commodity,
we encourage you to call on us to keep you informed and up to speed on issues relating to
the Waterfront.
Respectfully Submitted,
rt Parente
Chairman _.
a~- 436
V~~` ~ V V
sports & exhibition authority
Memo
Ta Kelli R. da Silva
Frorte Jim Jenkins
D~ae 2/25/02
Rye Board of Directors Evaluation
Per your r+eque~, erxlosed please find the information for the Miami Sports 8 Exhibition Authority
Board of Directors. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please feel free to me or
my assistant Andrea de la Madriz at (305) 350-7t~61.
701 Arena Blvd., Miami, Florida 33136 (305) 350-7861 /Fax (305) 350-7867
o~" ~.~~
Evaluation an Board of Directors
1. Whether the board is serving the purpose for which it was
created.
The qualifications listed in the code state that members shall be selected from
individuals associated with the tourist and hospitality industries in businesses
operating within the city. Aboard comprised of hotel, airport, travel industry,
travel agents, meeting planners, etc., could bring a stronger expertise in
furthering MSEA's current role and mission.
2. Whether the board is serving current community needs.
MSEA has been very active in providing grants to numerous organizations and
festivals each year. However, under MSEA's current statues, MSEA is pursuing a
more expanded role in the development of business plans and management of
such entities as "The Orange Bowl",,James L. Knight Center, Marine Stadium, as
well as a new convention center.
3. A list of the board's major accomplishments.
-Evaluating Miami Arena Management for productivity.
-Co-sponsoring city wide activities such as "South Beach Music Fest", Sunshine
Cycling, Miami Fusion Soccer at the Orange Bowl. Sponsoring festivals like The
Haitian Festival, Three King Parade, Brazilian Film Festival and community
programs such as the Optimist Club Awards.
4. Whether there is any other board, either public or private,
which would better serve the function of the board.
Hospitality, tourism, sporting councils, and entertainment promoters could be a
major force in furthering MSEA's mission.
5. Whether the ordinance creating the board should be amended
to better enable the board to serve the purpose for which it
was created.
MSEA's role in entertainment and tourism needs to be broader incorporating
ownership in sporting franchises, entertainment sponsorship, promoter activities
and tours as well as securing and developing exhibitions for the city.
02-- 436
6. Whether the board's membership requirements should be
modified.
Board member appointments currently expire in one year without "terms" limits.
In order to tap into community resources and expertise of individuals, MSFA's
BOD appointees should not exceed two terms.
7. The cost, both direct and indirect, of maintaining the board.
$50,000 per year
FEB-12-2002 11="5?
DATA:
TO:
.__.
FAX NO.
_ ~oi~:
~~IARKS:
CITY CLERKS ~~rr1CE - ,;~;~ 8JC y~i0 ~-~y
- Cirv of Miazz~
Office of ~e Cirv Cler •
Facsimile Transmittal Sheer
~//
~-
- /, - r3DD1
y~~ - ~o~s
~y-~ ~~;~
305-858-1610
~'or •~t ~t;,~~ o~ PAS- nor
_. ~ - CLUDDVG COQ ~':
--~-.~.~
Office of the CR,, ~#
?300 p~
11is:bi, F1onm X31 ~~ p G• Boot 33070e
..50~-fop
02•~ 436