Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutR-03-0884J-03-601 6/27/03 RESOLUTION NO. 133— 8814 A RESOLUTION OF THE MIAMI CITY COMMISSION APPROVING IN PRINCIPLE THE CORAL WAY MASTER PLAN AND DESIGN STANDARDS, HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS THE "CORAL WAY MASTER PLAN," AS A GUIDING TOOL FOR THE FUTURE DEVELOPMENT AND PRESERVATION OF CORRIDOR CHARACTER AND THE CONTINUED ECONOMIC VITALITY OF THIS SIGNIFICANT CORRIDOR AS DEFINED IN THE "CORAL WAY MASTER PLAN." WHEREAS, in March 2001 a planning process was initiated Planning and Zoning Department; and WHEREAS, in October 2001 a Zoning Overlay District was approved by the City of Miami Commission; and WHEREAS, in November 2001, the Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., consulting team, was hired by the Planning and Zoning Department to produce the Coral Way Master Plan; and WHEREAS, from January -October 2002 a series of neighborhood meetings were undertaken about the Coral Way Corridor; and CITY COMMISSION MEETENI G OF 4 ?P93 Resolution No. 03- 884 WHEREAS, the Miami Planning Advisory Board, at its meeting held on June 18, 2003, Item No. 8, following an advertised public hearing, adopted Resolution No. PAB 42-03 by a vote of seven to zero (7-0), RECOMMENDING APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS of the final draft of the Coral Way Master Plan, attached; and WHEREAS, the Historic and Environmental Preservation Board, at its meeting held on July 15, 2003, following an advertised public hearing, adopted Resolution No. HEPB-2003-50, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of the final draft of the Coral Way Master Plan, attached; and WHEREAS, the Department of Planning and Zoning recommended approval of the attached study; and WHEREAS, the Resolution has been the subject of a properly advertised public hearing before the City Commission; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. The recitals and findings contained in the Preamble to this Resolution are adopted by reference and incorporated as if fully set forth in this Section. Section 2. The members of the Miami City Commission approve the Coral Way Master Plan as a guiding tool for the future development and preservation of the Coral Way Corridor as defined in the Coral Way Master Plan. Page 2 o f 3 03- 884 Section 3. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its adoption and signature of the Mayor.'/ PASSED AND ADOPTED this 24th 2003. ATTEST: `/ 1 RI CILLA A. T OMPS CITY CLERK APPROVED FORM G ALEJ DRO VILARELLO CIT,lf ATTORNEY W7359:GKW:et day of July ago CORRECTNESS: UEL A. DIAZ, MAYOR 1� If the Mayor does not sign this Resolution, it shall become effective at the end of ten calendar days from the date it was passed and adopted. If the Mayor vetoes this Resolution, it shall become effective immediately upon override of the veto by the City Commission. Page 3 o f 3 03- 884 ITEM PZ 5 PLANNING FACT SHEET APPLICANT Planning and Zoning Department HEARING DATE June 18, 2003 REQUEST/LOCATION Coral Way LEGAL DESCRIPTION N/A. PETITION Consideration of approval of a resolution approving in principle the Coral Way Beautification- Master Plan & Design Standards here and after referred to as the "Coral Way Master Plan". Hereto, as a guiding tool for the future development and preservation of community character and the continued economic vitality of this significant district as defined in the "Coral Way Master Plan". PLANNING RECOMMENDATION Approval in concept. BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS See supporting documentation. PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD Recommended approval in VOTE: 7-0 principle to City Commission. CITY COMMISSION WA. APPLICATION NUMBER 2003-0033 Item #8 CITY OF MIAMI • PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT 444 SW 2ND AVENUE, 3RD FLOOR • MIAMI, FLORIDA, 33130 PHONE (305) 416-1400 Date: 7/15/2003 Page 1 03- 884 ANALYSIS FOR THE CITY OF MIAMI CORAL WAY BEAUTIFICATION MASTER PLAN & DESIGN STANDARDS CASE NO. 2003- 33 The Coral Way Beautification Master Plan & Design Standards referred as the Coral Way Master Plan provides a vision for the beautification and economic development of Coral Way Corridor from SW 1' to 37`" Avenue that will serve to protect, beautify and enhance the historic and the bright future of the corridor. The plan provides a direction for the beautification of the street right of way and establishes design guidelines for private development. The plan is the result of a planning process, which began in March of 2001 with a planning study and followed by the establishment of a Zoning Overlay district from the Planning and Zoning Department in October 2001. From January -October a series of meetings took place where the residents, merchants and investors were able to participate and make recommendations about the future of the corridor and review the draft plan. The plan was presented to PAB on June 18, 2003. Based on a comprehensive review of the attached proposal the City makes the following findings 1. It is found that the proposed Planning Study reinforces and enhances the unique character and opportunities of Coral Way right of way has because of its existing trees. It recommends additional right of way improvements including landscaping, lighting of the trees, street furniture, sidewalk improvements, and beautification of the roadway. 2. It was found that the plan recommends right of way improvements, which make the right of way more attractive, will facilitate the increase of pedestrian activity along the sidewalks and public open spaces, will create safe pedestrian crossing at major intersections, and will improve off-street parking conditions. All these actions by the public sector are expected to attract private investments and economic revitalization. 3. It was found that the plan promotes compact development and mixes of uses which are expected to attract new commercial -residential development creating a 24-hour city. 4. It was found that the proposed design standards will improve the visual character of the existing and future buildings by enhancing the appearance of the storefronts and commercial buildings, and will contribute to improve the overall appearance of Coral Way. 5. It is found that the zoning and land development regulations, while merely proposals, are of a clear and specific nature and may be mistaken for actual regulations. Based on the analysis and findings incorporated above, the Planning & Zoning Department recommends approval in concept of the proposed Coral Way Beautification Master Plan & Design Standards. It is believed that the plan will serve well as a tool for guiding -the City of Miami in regulating new development, preserving community character, and the continued economic vitality throughout this significant corridor of the City of Miami. 93- 994 RESOLUTION PAB - 42-03 A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL IN PRINCIPLE OF THE CORAL WAY BEAUTIFICATION MASTER PLAN AND DESIGN STANDARDS HERE AND AFTER REFERRED TO AS THE "CORAL WAY MASTER PLAN", HERETO, AS A GUIDING TOOL FOR THE FUTURE DEVELOPMENT AND PRESERVATION OF COMMUNITY CHARACTER AND THE CONTINUED ECONOMIC VITALITY OF THIS SIGNIFICANT DISTRICT AS DEFINED IN THE "CORAL WAY MASTER PLAN". HEARING DATE: June 18, 2003 ITEM NO.: 8 VOTE: 7-0 ATTEST• /-:--�" elabert-Sanchez, D' or Planning and Zoning Department 03- 884 RESOLUTION NO. HEPB-2003-50 A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL PRESERVATION BOARD ("HEP BOARD") OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, RESPECTFULLY RECOMMENDING TO THE MIAMI CITY COMMISSION APPROVAL, ADOPTION AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROPOSED CORAL WAY BEAUTIFICATION MASTER PLAN AND DESIGN STANDARDS. PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 15TH DAY OF JULY, 2003. /- u�� c� SARAH EATON PRESERVATION OFFICER RAI FERNANDEZ CHAIRMAN 03" 8$4 BEAUTIFICATION MASTER PLAN & DESIGN STA orrl(ES CFCOMMISSIONERS JOE SAN CHEZ A"INID TOMAS REGALADO June 2003 Urban Resource Group A division of Kimley-H(,rn and Associates, Inc. 03- 884 The Vision for Coral Way... A place that provides a mix of living, working, shopping, and entertainment in a historic and tropical atmosphere. A place that is active, lively, and embracing of an urban lifestyle that reinforces Miami's multi -cultural characteristics and complementsthe unique look created by the existing tree canopy. An urban corridor which combines a variety of building heights, shapes and architectural styles, that has land uses geared to the pedestrians, that encourages window shopping, outdoor cafes, restaurants, human interaction along wide sidewalks, plazas, open spaces, balconies and arcades. An urban corridor that connects Downtown Miami/ Brickell with Coral Gables and West Miami -Dade County, and provides for adequate parking, discouraging the use of the automobile at ground floor, and discouraging its view at upper floors. A place that has attractive colors, materials, lighting landscaping; that is safe to the public welfare. A place that provides a variety of housing for all income and age groups, that provides residents and users with a variety of 24 hour services, including among others: restaurants and entertainment. 03- 884 City of Miami Planning and Zoning Department Community Planning Division 444 SW 2nd Avenue 3rd Floor Miami, FL 33130 PO Box 330708 Ana Gelabert-Sanchez - Director Lourdes Slazyk - Assistant Director Jose R. Casanova Jr., R.A., G.C. - Project Manger Enrique D. Nunez, ASLA - Landscape Architect Felipe Van Cotthem - Urban Designer Office of Commissioner Joe Sanchez - District 3 Office of Commissioner Tomas Regalado - District 4 Urban Resource Group A division of Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Urban Design and Landscape Architecture 420 Lincoln Road Suite 353 Miami Beach, FL 33139 305-673-2524 Steve Lefton, ASLA, AICP - Principal Planner Bruno P. Carvalho, ASLA - Project Manager NUN Planning Group/ New Urbao Stadia Urban Design and Architecture The Moore Building 4040 NE 2nd Ave, Suite 301 Miami, FL 33137 305-573-5101 Mauricio Castro Oscar Machado June 2013 03— 884 we of Contents I. Executive Summary II. Background A. Introduction/ Parts of the Plan 4 B. Local Historic Precedence and Overview 6 C. Existing Zoning and Land Use 7 III. Part One - Beautification Master Plan 44 A. Master Plan Zone Boundaries 10 B. Existing Conditions 11 C. Public Involvement 22 D. Illustrative Master Plan 23 E. Proposed Conditions 25 F. Crosswalk/ Intersection Layout 29 G. Typical Corner Layouts 30 H. Gateway Design 31 I. Public & Private Space Relationship 32 J. Plant Palette 34 K. Street Furniture 37 L. Lighting 39 M. Preliminary Opinion of Probable Construction Cost 41 IV. Part Two - Design Standards A. Intent 44 B. Urban Components 46 C. Regulating Plan & Design Standards 49 1. Center Zone Standards 50 2. General Zone Standards 51 3. Architectural Standards 52 V. Appendix A. Technical Plan Sheets Appendix `A' B. Street Planting Diagrams Appendix `B' C. Typical Urban Details Appendix `C' D. Analysis Boards Appendix `D' E. Signage/ Special Features Appendix `E' F. Community Input Appendix `F' G. Alternative Intersection Designs Appendix `G' 03- 884 Executive Summary This master plan addresses the general planning and design standards for the portion of Coral Way between SW lst Ave and SW 371 Ave, a distance of approximately 3 1/2 miles. The intent of the guidelines and standards established in this document is to enhance and protect the unique image and character that Coral Way establishes in the City. As the corridor develops and becomes a hub of new activity, the history and heritage of the corridor will always remain. Under the leadership of Commissioners Joe Sanchez and Tomas Regalado, the City of Miami Planning Department has set in motion an unprecedented planning process to make a significant investment of city funds into the beautification of Coral Way as well as establish design guidelines for private development along the corridor. The main objective of this plan is to create a vision for the beautification improvements in the public right-of-way and establish design guidelines for private development which are consistent with the SD -23 Coral Way Overlay District Ordinance. The ordinance intends to preserve the character of Coral Way and emphasize its importance as gateway into the City. The objective is to ensure that future redevelopment activity respects the unique character of Coral Way and complements the scale and variety of uses along the corridor. 11 Beautifuntion Master Plan With the assistance of the City and the stakeholders, the consultant team developed a Beautification Master Plan based on qualitative input gathered during the public involvement process and quantitative data collected during on site inventory and analysis of the corridor. The resulting Beautification Master Plan includes typical layouts for the various elements that make up an urban corridor. These elements include: sidewalk treatments, crosswalk design, gateway design, corner layouts, lighting, landscape, art in public places, and street furniture. 21 Resile Standards The Design Standards codify the master plan by establishing specific guidelines for urban, streetscape and architectural elements along Coral Way. These Standards address improvements within the public right-of-way, and improvements to abutting structures including building layout, building uses, facade treatments, building materials, public/ private spaces, and parking. The elements of the Design Standards are as follows: Urban Components: The urban components separate the typical cross section of a corridor into different areas: building, transition area, sidewalk, landscape verge and buffer area. Each of these spaces are designed with the other in mind, assuring a cohesive design for the corridor. The Regulating Plan: A major component of the Design Standards is the Regulating Plan. This plan is essentially a map that dictates the type of development which should occur along the corridor based on the intended street character. The Regulating plan subdivides the corridor into distinct Zones based on the intended development intensity. Each Zone has its own set of standards which govern the layout and appearance of each structure and specific streetscape components. Streetscape Standards: Govern the placement and selection of furnishings, fixtures, plantings and hardscape. Urban Standards: Govern the placement of buildings, locations of parking and proposed use within buildings by level and proximity to the public realm. Architectural Standards: Govern the building materials and configurations of the major building components, including roofs, openings, walls, elements and signage. Briugiug the Parts Together The public sector beautification elements work with the private sector standards to create a cohesive design all along the corridor. To this effect, these two parts are essentially based on a common design language that endeavors to unite the many complex components of the Coral Way corridor. The Next Step This document sets the foundation for future implementation to occur. Based on the guidelines and standards set forth within this report, the next steps in the implementation process are to develop construction documents and to obtain approval and adoption of the design standards, followed by actual construction of the project. In efforts to stimulate interest and add momentum to the process, the City has expressed interest in fast tracking a small "Pilot Project" for the median improvements. This project would include landscape uplighting, landscape and irrigation for a small portion (perhaps two blocks) of the study corridor. Such a project will produce an immediate tangible result needed to carry the rest of the study corridor into fruition. JOAOUIM UTSET 0 Nuevo vwatd a Ctud%d tie Miami prt: numi boy on dtitt o sit' pimres tie transrornna la his I ico call(, Coral Way en un prospero y ire eje urltano que coltique al Veaion 1•1 centro de w de-:irrollo. litiificlos de fichadas atractivas con mercies Y cafe. en sus plantas bajas, larenavadas que inviten a pasear y •:.i via emix,titrid t eon mobiliario or- :.. sen patlede In visi6n de Coral .V que !ns timcionarios niunicipales v�niaran -n una reunion. on la Igle- Nute,trp Sefiora del Libano, oreeant- pam rerabar la opinion de los resi- n -a �d Ka:' r� ntwj<n:i irwrkvitltrir', br 'Iltm' Wagrxr, adminisuador de la qfi -�.- tuuntcilel NEr del iiia. quien dews ;.qui se noplique A &cite de bictres rai- -> tit � la vena de Bridcell. ?.a intention es transformar la actual n� t<m de Citral Wat de una simple via ".an-_itct con "innereius de de,0plai �.d,d at tin frau urbann de cuidada os i e use ptitmi ins*aitr nuev x han t re itm de busurn, pavimentar con -illtx Ins eruct-_ de peaton-, agregar -t. neria y &omen r aljum tips de ele- !,t decut-ati— nue realt a iss-.m-, a y r� 7, t 5 vc�x(ON• War -''/u• .. � runri 1 rAry Y Presentan hoy el plan para transformer la historica Coral %%a}- tlevle Douglas Rthid. Nro, aparte de entbeRecer el typacto publico, el plan mamtnn que la Ciudad piensa dt--arrollar en las proximos me- ses nXRda" el tipo do negocios y c6mo sus fachadas deben lucir para estar de acuetdo con la nueva Coral Way. 'Ibdas tas plantas hajas quleren que lean comerciales, con unidades de vh vienda u of➢cinas en las plantas supe- riores". seiW6 Zulty Ruiz, una promo• tora inmobiliaria que colabora con la Ciudad de Miami en la renovacidn do la via. "La idea es que la Bente venga aqui a vivir y trabajar•', agteg6. La C.omision de Miami ya aprobo el afro pasado restrieciones a la presenia ---. de ciertos tipo de locales, Como Javan- derias o lutes de yenta do autos usada6. Tambien se lhnito el tipo de letrem antmctos luminoscs o earteles pubtict• tarios. No se permitir'An Rete a to (,a- Ile cercas tie alambre, ni estaclona- mientos de automoviles, y sc abligaril a embellecer las fachadas para que co - m lguen con el aspceto de la via. Con etlo se esper'a evitar arrores co- - mo el del recien terminatio Hotel Fat - tended StayAmerica entre tas avenidas 36 y 37 del SLY, cuya fachada secunda - ria sin atractivo es precisamente In que da a Coral Way, senaM el arquitecto 03— El + INTRODUCTION + HISTORIC PRECEDENCE AND OVERVIEW + CHARACTER OF THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT + EXISTING ZONING AND LAND USE 03- 884 Introduction In an effort to enhance the beauty and quality of the Coral Way Corridor, The City of Miami Planning and Zoning Department in cooperation with the offices of Commissioners Joe Sanchez and Tomas Regalado, have established this Beautification Master Plan and Design Standards for Coral Way between SW I I Ave and SW 37' Ave (a total distance of approximately 3.5 miles). As a designated historic roadway, Coral Way has played a significant role in the development of Miami. This history, which dates back to the City Beautiful movement of the 1920's, is still evident today in the grandeur of the Banyan trees, which serve as the signature element of this corridor. Coral Way is a state owned roadway within the City of Miami, except for the area between SW V Ave to the I-95 overpass which is City owned. Working within a state-owned right-of-way poses some limitations primarily in proposing lane width and curb radius modifications, since these elements are covered by specific state design standards. As a result of this, no travel lane widths are being modified as part of this document with the exception of the area between SW I st Ave and the Interstate 95 overpass. This stretch of the corridor is the only right-of-way owned by the City of Miami included in this study. In this particular area where the corridor connects to the Brickell Village community, the character of Coral Way changes significantly becoming more of a "downtown" street rather than a wide urban boulevard. For this reason, more flexibility is allowed in terms of the suggested layout of the corridor. The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) has planned their own improvements for parts of this corridor (between SW 12'h Ave and SW 3711 Ave). These improvements were completed mid year 2002 and included decorative light pole installations, trimming of the Banyan Tree roots along the median and resurfacing of the roadway. After the resurfacing, FDOT will place a 10 -year moratorium on any road cuts along the newly replaced asphalt. In an effort to partner with FDOT, the City of Miami has coordinated the placement of conduits to be installed by FDOT as part of their current roadway improvements. These conduits will serve to house future irrigation pipes and landscape lighting wires for the proposed beautification improvements included in this document. Parts of the Plan There are two distinct yet integral parts of the urban streetscape: 1) The public corridor; 2) The abutting private sector development. In order for Coral Way to thrive as a true urban corridor, these two elements must complement each other, and not cause an inverse relationship contributing to the decline of the urban fabric and social life of the street. The two components of this document; The Beautification Master Plan, and the Design Guidelines, focus on complementing and unifying both the public and private elements of the corridor. In order to do this effectively, the Beautification Master Plan and Design Guidelines are based on the following strategies: The Beautification Master Plan is based on the division of the corridor into six separate Zones. These Zones represent distinct existing characteristics currently found along the corridor. By creating this separation, each particular Zone is analyzed, according to the existing characteristics, insuring that the proposed improvements correspond to the specific existing conditions such as cross sections of the road, landscaping, building use and form, etc. More on this is described on page xx. 11ANTIRCHION 111NOANOS lanes This image illustrates the six distinct Zones for the BEAUTIFICATION MASTER PLAN. These six Zones are based on existing conditions found in the site such as the existing street cross-section. The Design Guidelines component also subdivides the corridor into Zones, but the separation is based on desired or intended characteristics for the corridor, rather than existing conditions. In order to clearly define a logical pattern for the 0ESI6N 1111111NES JOBS intended development along the corridor, the concept of the "transect" is utilized as the basis for the Zone separation in the Design Guidelines. CENTER GENERAL CENTER The transect is based on the intensity of development along a linear model. At one end is the lowest intensity Zone called the Rural Preserve, in this area for example, the primary concern is environmental preservation, thus very little to no development occurs. On the other end of the transect is the Urban Core, s- SW 13th T which represents the area of most development intensity like a city's downtownga3`a w or financial district. The Zones represented along Coral Way are the Center Zone, r � which is the Zone of highest development intensity along Coral Way, and the General Zone which is one degree less in intensity than the Center Zone. A more y detailed description of these Zones is found in pages xx through xx. I cwuLWAY (SW 2z�,dsr� ST) 1 — It is important to point out that the Zones based on existing conditions from This image illustrates the two distinct areas (CENTER & GENERAL) for the DESIGN GUIDELINES. the Beautification Master Plan is overlaid by the transect Zones in the design These two areas overlay the Zones for the beautification standards. These areas are based on the desired or guidelines to insure that the both components relate to one another. intended development characteristics for the corridor and are laid out according to the transect concept for development intensity. Cora[ Way Beautification Master Man & Design Standards City of Miami © 2002 Urban Resource Group - A division of Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc. r) c kgr u1 03- 884 :E. - =' ili i i r r CORAL WAY (SW 22nd ST) This image illustrates the six distinct Zones for the BEAUTIFICATION MASTER PLAN. These six Zones are based on existing conditions found in the site such as the existing street cross-section. The Design Guidelines component also subdivides the corridor into Zones, but the separation is based on desired or intended characteristics for the corridor, rather than existing conditions. In order to clearly define a logical pattern for the 0ESI6N 1111111NES JOBS intended development along the corridor, the concept of the "transect" is utilized as the basis for the Zone separation in the Design Guidelines. CENTER GENERAL CENTER The transect is based on the intensity of development along a linear model. At one end is the lowest intensity Zone called the Rural Preserve, in this area for example, the primary concern is environmental preservation, thus very little to no development occurs. On the other end of the transect is the Urban Core, s- SW 13th T which represents the area of most development intensity like a city's downtownga3`a w or financial district. The Zones represented along Coral Way are the Center Zone, r � which is the Zone of highest development intensity along Coral Way, and the General Zone which is one degree less in intensity than the Center Zone. A more y detailed description of these Zones is found in pages xx through xx. I cwuLWAY (SW 2z�,dsr� ST) 1 — It is important to point out that the Zones based on existing conditions from This image illustrates the two distinct areas (CENTER & GENERAL) for the DESIGN GUIDELINES. the Beautification Master Plan is overlaid by the transect Zones in the design These two areas overlay the Zones for the beautification standards. These areas are based on the desired or guidelines to insure that the both components relate to one another. intended development characteristics for the corridor and are laid out according to the transect concept for development intensity. Cora[ Way Beautification Master Man & Design Standards City of Miami © 2002 Urban Resource Group - A division of Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc. r) c kgr u1 03- 884 Findiols and Recommendations The following is a list of findings and corresponding recommendations for general issues regarding the Coral Way corridor which set the ground work for the suggested improvements within this document. findings • Banyan trees provide the unique character to the corridor. This character can be upgraded by up -lighting these trees. • Coral Way is a gateway into the city and should be preserved and enhanced. • Character of the corridor varies considerably within 3 different segments: A) from SW 1 Ave to I-95, B) from I-95 to SW 12 Ave, C) from SW 12 Ave to SW 37 Ave. • Coral Way is a very diverse urban corridor containing a combination of one and two-story residential developments up to ten stories, and developments predominantly one-story retail and service establishments. Many of the retail/service establishments are located against the property line which encourages window shopping and pedestrian activity. • The built frontage along Coral Way is typically a disorganized and unappealing retail and service corridor with offices, storefronts and facades that contain a varied mix of signage, awnings, colors, and storefront features. • New developments along the corridor consist of multi story housing or mixed commercial/residential developments which bring a substantial amount of residential development along the corridor. It provides an opportunity for a mix of living, working, shopping, and entertainment in a historic and tropical atmosphere. It provides an opportunity for a lively day and night environment including restaurants and entertainment. • Nodes of retail/service uses occur at SW 121}', 17d', 22nd, 27th 32nd and 37 I Aves. • Narrow and unappealing sidewalks exist especially close to retail - service nodes. There are poor pedestrian crossing definitions at major intersections. • Existing street furniture is in poor condition and disorganized. • There is a need to encourage a pedestrian friendly environment, especially close to existing retail nodes and major intersections. • Three million dollars is available at this time from the Coral Way Beautification project from the City of Miami Homeland Defense and Neighborhood Improvements Bonds. Additional funding sources are needed for this project. ac k rO U'r d 03— 884 Recommendotions ** Future development and redevelopment activity along Coral Way needs to respect and complement the scale, character, and variety of uses along the corridor. * In order to implement the Coral Way Beautification Master Plan and Design Standards the following is recommended: • Implement the design standards to provide the corridor with an improved look. • Upgrade the existing zoning overlay SD 23 in order to facilitate pedestrian oriented development. • Implement the Banyan tree up -light project. Start at major intersections between SW 121 and 371 Avenues. • Implement pedestrian oriented improvements, including sidewalk improvements, crosswalk designs, lighting, on -street parking improvements and street furniture. • Implement Gateway projects, and Art in Public Places. Consider a design competition. • Continue the study and implement a plan for the intersection of SW 15th St and 3rd Ave, and for the intersection of SW 121 Ave, SW 3rd Ave and SW 221 St (five points). • Because of the cost of the project, the emphasis should be in the completion of the design for the entire corridor and the implementation of the project in phases. Phase I should be between SW 12t' and 3711, Aves, and the remaining phases between SW l st and 121 Aves. • Look for additional funding sources to implement the entire project, including state and federal funds. Design Principles This document is based on the O principles of New Urbanism, a philosophy that is built on five tenets: 1. The promotion of compact and diverse development 2. The inclusion of a hierarchical thoroughfare network that promotes the equitable treatmentO of pedestrians and vehicles. 3. Neighborhoods have clear and active centers that include opportunities for commerce, culture and governance. 4. Establish a balance of focus between the public and the private realm. 5. A clear definition of the street reinforced by the buil environment providing 3 clear distinguishable outline for the City. r1 Tl ?n' n , �,,, girth - ;..L �.g Cora[ Way Beautification MasteTP[an K Design Standards City of Miami © 2002 Urban Resource Group - A division of Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc. local Historic Precedence As with most urban planning endeavors, history plays an important role in defining both the present and future character of Coral Way. There are many historic precedences found within the greater Miami area which set the tone for Coral Way. From building form to avenue layout, traces of these historic precedences can be seen in Coral Way today, and should set the basis for future development as well. Miami City grid One of the most valuable assets, of the layout of the City of Miami, is its city street grid. Unlike suburban sprawl in South Dade, the city grid allows for multiple uses of transportation throughout the city. This relieves the street network to allow East-West traffic as well as North-South traffic to traverse the city without the detrimental aspects of collector roads. Avenues Consistent street trees, such as these Palms were successfully used throughout Florida to define the space of the street. Like Coral Way, street trees give character to the place they are in. Miami and Coral gables Coral Way was built to connect the City of Miami with Coral Gables. At the very terminus is the City Hall of Coral Gables. The character of the place should be a recognizable trajectory, throughout the different and distinct Zones of the prominent and special place that is the Coral Way corridor. Coral Way Historic Overview Like other similar great streets that have a celebrated median, such as Dolores Street in San Francisco and Monument Avenue in Richmond, Virginia, Coral Way contributes in three very important ways to the urban fabric of Miami. 1. Gives structure and comprehension to its urban context. 2. Serves as a monumental connection linking two distinct places. 3. Accommodates places for everyday urban living such as cafes, restaurants, shopping, offices and homes. Few urban boulevards in South Florida share the unique characteristic of having a delicate balance between beauty and functionality as found along Coral Way as it passes through the City of Miami between SW 371 Ave and the I-95 underpass. Beginning in 1922 with citrus lined streets, and then growing to have streetcar tracks down the center of the road, to finally the Banyan Tree -lined median of today, Coral Way still remains one of the main thoroughfares between Coral Gables, and the City of Miami. In 1929, a Roadside Beautification Program was started in Dade County. People were very skeptical about this program, as they believed that funds allocated to this project would be better spent on road repair as opposed to beautification. Thus, pressure was on the County to show the residents some results quickly. Therefore, by mid—summer of 1929, 1200 Banyan trees were planted along Coral Way and other main roads in the area. At this time, the streetcar rails were still located in the middle of Coral Way, so the trees were only planted on the roadside. At the time of planting, the Banyan Trees were merely three feet in height, but began to grow rapidly soon reaching impressive canopy spreads. In 1935, a hurricane damaged the street car lines in the area. As a result, the Parks Department and the County Engineer applied to the Public Works Association to remove the rails from the then damaged rapid transit system. The road was to be completely rebuilt to include a center median. The Banyan Trees were relocated from the roadside to the new center median, and there they flourished, giving the corridor its current unique look. Presently, Coral Way is designated a historic highway, and as early as 1949, it was decided that the Banyan trees would stay, regardless of some misconceptions that they create a negative impact on traffic. This year marks the 80t, birthday of the corridor. This document recognizes the rich history and distinctive characteristics of the corridor, and establishes these elements as the backbone for future development standards within Coral Way. Cora[ Way Beautification Master Plan a Design Standards -�� City of iiia i © 2002 urban Resource Group - A division of Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc. Original citrus trees planted along the sides of Coral Way. Development occuring along Coral Way. Way. Early commercial character of Coral Way. A trolley line is visible along the center of the road. B L, k un d 884 Existing zoning all laid Use As illustrated in the map below, there are two primary zoning designations within the Coral Way corridor. Along the SW 13th Street and SW 3rd Avenue portion of the corridor, the underlying zoning is primarily office. Along the SW 22nd Ave portion of the corridor, the primary zoning is commercial. It is important to note that these zoning designations both allow for a variety of different land uses as illustrated on the map to the right, thus creating part of the unique urban makeup of Coral Way. In July of 2001, the City of Miami Commission passed an amendment to the City's zoning ordinance creating a special overlay district which brought established requirements and limitations on uses for the Coral Way area. The main elements of this ordinance strive to protect and enhance the exiting unique urban character of the corridor. Among some of the effects of this ordinance is the requirement of a class II special permit for new construction within the corridor. cr 03— 884 Existing land Use Map Existing 100110 Map Cora[ Way Beautification Master Man a Design Standards City of Miami © 2002 Urban Resource Croup -A division of Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. + MASTER PLAN ZONE BOUNDARIES + EXISTING CONDITIONS AND ANALYSIS + PUBLIC PROCESS + ILLUSTRATIVE MASTER PLAN + PROPOSED CONDITIONS + TYPICAL CROSSWALK AND INTERSECTION LAYOUT + TYPICAL CORNER TREATMENTS + GATEWAY DESIGN + PUBLIC & PRIVATE SPACE RELATIONSHIP + PLANT PALETTE + STREET FURNITURE PALETTE + LIGHTING + OPINION OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST 03- 884 Master Plan lose Boundaries The beautification master plan is subdivided into six (6) Zones to illustrate the design concepts. Each Zone differs in character. The Zone boundaries were designated based upon analysis of existing corridor conditions including building density and use, roadway layout, vegetation, and intersections with major avenues. Beginning at the eastern end of the corridor, these Zones are as follows: Zone I: (SW 1311 St) — from SW 2nd Ave to the I-95 overpass Zone H: (SW 31d Ave or "The Roads") - from the 1-95 overpass to SW 12" Ave Zone III: (SW 22nd St) — from SW 12" Ave to SW 17t1 Ave) Zone IV: (SW 22nd St) — from SW 1711 Ave to SW 2711 Ave) Zone V. (SW 22nd St) — from SW 2711 Ave to SW 32nd Ave) Zone VI: (SW 22°d St) — from SW 321 Ave to SW 3711 Ave) 11111 This section of the Coral Way study corridor, referred to as SW 13th Street, connects the Brickell Village area of Miami to "The Roads" community. This section is signifi- cantly different from the rest of the study area in that there is no planted median with Banyan trees. This area is characterized by large, detached retail stores (Publix and Walgreens) on the south side, and two to four story residential and office buildings on the north side. The metrorail line passes over the corridor towards the eastern edge of the study area. We 2 The corridor through this Zone referred to as SW 3rd Ave, bisects the "Roads" com- munity. This area has a very distinctive character within the City of Miami primarily due to the unique diagonal layout of the street network, which are all designated as "roads." SW 3rd Ave serves as the spine for this neighborhood as Coral Way continues west. Major uses along this part of the corridor are primarily office and residential with some commercial. With a right-of-way of 120 feet, SW 3rd Ave can be considered an urban boulevard with its wide landscaped median and a very pleasant mixture of abut- ting uses, which for the most part contribute to the serene feel of this corridor. hies 3,4,5 These three Zones are located in the part of the study corridor referred to as SW 22nd Street. This section of the study area connects "The Roads" community with the more commercialized area of the Coral Way corridor and eventually Coral Gables. Although they differ slightly in terms of urban context, these Zones share many similarities such as mix of building uses and densities, right-of-way cross sections, and vegetation. we e This Zone is also located along SW 22nd St, yet it differs from Zones 3 to 5 in that there are three lanes going west bound starting at SW 32nd Ave as opposed to the two lanes typically found in the other three Zones. Additionally, the abutting commercial buildings along the north end of the corridor in this area are at a much larger scale than what is typical for the rest of the study area. These buildings include Sears, Winn Dixie, and the Miracle Center Mall. Cora[ Way Beautification Master P[ana Design Standards ` City of Miami © 2002 Urban Resource Group - A division of Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc. t -_i{ =4 _ i 1 0T. llllt � t Master p 03— 884 A. Several buildings on the north side of the corridor offer a good relationship to the street, enhancing the character of this area. B. The narrower cross section along this area provides the opportunity to enlarge sidewalks and provide a more pedestrian -oriented corridor. C. This area serves as the connector between "The Roads" neighborhood and the Brickell Village area of Miami. This important connection should be emphasized through the proposed cross section of the street and the intensity and density of the adjacent buildings. Facing the northwest comer of SW 13th St and SW 2nd Ave. This is the primary intersection of this Zone. Opportunities exist to enhance this space by shortening crossing distances, and introducing decorative ele- ments such as crosswalks and landscape to this space. LEGEND B BUILDING BL BUS LANE C/G CURB AND GUTTER LV LANDSCAPE VERGE M MEDIAN P PARKING S SHOULDER SW SIOMALK AREA T TRANSITION ZONE TL TRAVEL LANE AREA NOT AFFECTED BY STIAY Oft IOft loft GRAPHIC SCALE Looking east towards Brickell, at the intersection of SW 15th Road. There is an opportunity to introduce a round -a -bout in this intersection. Facing east along the north side of SW 13th Street. Buildings along this Zone relate poorly to the public realm on both sides of the street. Here a six foot wall visually and physically sepa- rates the building from the street reducing the quality of the urban experience in this area. Existiog Cross Sectioo The existing typical cross sec- tion for this Zone is comprised of 5 foot wide sidewalks and 5 foot wide landscape verges on either side of the travel lanes. The travel lanes are 11 feet wide west bound and 10 feet wide east bound. On -street parking exists directly in front of the Publix supermarket. Power poles are located along the north sidewalk about 2 feet from the travel lane. 18111 JSW 131h Street) SW 1 st Avenue to 1-95 ZONE 6 ZONE 5 ZONE ZONE ZONE ZONE Characteristics 6 Qualities Predominantly small commercial and residential buildings on north side and larger commercial buildings on south side Very light pedestrian movement Bus stops are in-line Intersection with 3rd Ave — operationally and aesthetically dysfunctinal; Opportunity for round -a -bout Very little canopy No center median Utility poles on sidewalk on north side render sidewalk non ADA compliant Most vehicular traffic flow in this area is through commuter traffic as opposed to local traffic. --- J - ---r- s ty o f Miami ©2002 UTban Resource G(oup -A division of Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 93- 884 60FAL 1 SW 13M W W W W W Q Q Q Q Q y\`0 C M M N c CORAL WAV (SW 22nd ST) Characteristics 6 Qualities Predominantly small commercial and residential buildings on north side and larger commercial buildings on south side Very light pedestrian movement Bus stops are in-line Intersection with 3rd Ave — operationally and aesthetically dysfunctinal; Opportunity for round -a -bout Very little canopy No center median Utility poles on sidewalk on north side render sidewalk non ADA compliant Most vehicular traffic flow in this area is through commuter traffic as opposed to local traffic. --- J - ---r- s ty o f Miami ©2002 UTban Resource G(oup -A division of Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 93- 884 We 2 [SW 3rd Avenel 1-95 to SW 12th Avenue ZONE 6 ZONE 5 ZONE 4 ZONE 3 ® ZONE 1 ,'''�U� l— LU G�Of('AL WA SW I3th ST LU UJ LU �4%� �f N t CORAL WAV (SW 22nd STI -� characteristics 6 Qualities A. Two traffic lanes west bound, two east bound B. Various unmarked on -street parking areas — mostly on gravel C. Mixed density — ranges from single family to 12 stories D. Mixed uses — office (general zoning) — residential, commercial E. Bus stops are in-line F. Commercial area focused towards I-95 G. Single family residential surroundings H. 25" and 26th Aves — connectors to US- I and I-95 I. Very light pedestrian movement J. Overall residential character K. Several intersections do not have handicap ramps and striped -out There is a diversity of building types and density throughout this Zone. Shown here is a twelve -story residen- tial tower near the intersection with SW 12th Ave. The existing surface parking lot just north of St. Sophia's offers a good opportunity for redevelopment. The "highest and best use" for this site could be a mixed-use/mid-rise de- velopment which contributes to the ground level use of the corridor and the archiectural diversity of the neigh- borhood as well. A. "The Roads" area of the Coral Way corridor offers a spectacular display of an urban boulevard with the large Banyan trees in the median and the many diverse styles of architecture and density found along both sides. B. There are many instances where the buildings relate well to the street, such as the example shown below. This type of relationship results in good pedestrian use of the street and contributes to the overall social character of the corridor. C. The mix of uses from office to commercial to residential is a positive characteristic of this area. This mix could be enhanced by providing development opportunities which incorporate these uses in a single structure. D. The more passive aspect of this corridor should be preserved and enhanced by additional sidewalk landscape improvements and crosswalks which provide pedestrian refuge at the center medians. This image shows a good example of an urban condition along the corridor found just south of the I-95 overpass. The cafes in this area engage the sidewalk, creating - - a vibrant pedestrian realm. This sort of urban character should be encouraged throughout the corridor. e B19LDING BL BUS LANE G/G CURB AND GUTTER LV LANDSCAPE VERGE N NEMN P PARKING S SHOULDER SW SDEWALK AREA T TRANSITION ZONE TL TRAVEL LANE Coral Way Beautification. /Master Man & Design Standards City of /Miami © 2002 Urban Resource Group - A division of Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc. ENistiog Cross Section The existing cross section is com- prised of a 5 foot sidewalk, a 10 foot miscellaneous area that serves as parking and/or landscape area, a 4 foot shoulder, two travel lanes and a 34 foot wide median. +� 884 A. Many diverse single -story "mom and pop" businesses give this Zone a very definable character. These businesses also provide a variety of services which promote pedestrian use of the corridor. Their zero -lot line relationship to the street, adds to the definition of the corridor and strengthens the overall cross section through this Zone. B. The continuous planted median with the Banyan trees is a priceless asset to this corridor. The Banyans not only offer shade, but define this street as a truly unique boulevard within the urban context of Miami. C. The on -street parking provides a good buffer between the traffic lanes and the pedestrian area. D. The diversity in uses, density and scale of the buildings along this area add to the richness of this corridor's urban character. This Zone is primarily defined `s by the various single -story "mom d pop" businesses. This type of ero-lot line structures work well - n defining the street corridor and rovide a wide variety of services hat encourage pedestrian use of a he street. Their presence can be nhanced by design guidelines hich regulate facade treatments = o strengthen the visual image of he corridor. Image # 1 shows the intersection with NW 17th Ave. This busy intersection, as with the other major intersections of the corridor, lacks several im- portant urban elements: continuity, cohesiveness, edge, and shade should be enhanced in these spaces. The density and use within this Zone varies from single -story commercial buildings to office buildings, which are two to three stories. Zile 3 (SW 221d Street] SW 12th Ave to SW 17th Ave ZONE 6 ZONE 5 ZONE 4 ® ZONE 2 ZONE 1 Characteristics 11aal1ies A. Predominantly small commercial uses B. Buildings located at ROW line C. Good pedestrian movement D. Good overall canopy coverage E. No existing understory planting F. Existing "bulb -outs" at corners 03- 884 a a a A A N DORAL WAY (SW 21"1 Sn Characteristics 11aal1ies A. Predominantly small commercial uses B. Buildings located at ROW line C. Good pedestrian movement D. Good overall canopy coverage E. No existing understory planting F. Existing "bulb -outs" at corners 03- 884 Zone 410 220 Street) SW 17th Ave to SW 27th Ave ZONE 6 ZONE 5 ZONE 4 ZONE 3 ZONE 2 ZONE 1 f.`WWAY W W W W W 1 g'//'� SW 13th ST Q Q Q Q Q /LU > ai 3 3 ✓ Wil/ °�' v�'i vii --� CORAL WAV (SW 22ntl 9T) // charaeteristics 6 Qaalities A. Valley gutters divide parallel parking and travel lanes B. Some larger office buildings C. Some residential buildings D. Light pedestrian movement E. Smaller commercial predominantly on south side F. Building set back further from ROW on north side G. Good canopy coverage except near major intersections H. SW 271 Ave — major commercial bisector Aspects A. This Zone includes buildings of varying densities which offer zero -lot line relationships to the corridor. This relationship is enhanced by the active ground floor use of these buildings which include: restaurants, shops and businesses, all adding to the pedestrian activity at the street level. The Banyan trees along this Zone offer splendid shade along the corridor. The on -street parking provides a good buffer between the travel lanes Intersection of SW 27th Ave. Much like the intersection of SW 17th Ave, this space is void of many of the important elements that are needed to create good urban conditions. Corner of SW 22nd Ave. Wide crossing distances and poor aesthetics are typical conditions found at the major intersections throughout the corridor. Opportunities ex- ist to beautify these elements by introducing different materials such as colored concrete crosswalks and re- ducing crosswalk widths wherever possible. Historic Marathon Gas Station - SW corner of 17th Ave. This magnificent building is the only historically desig- nated building in the corridor. It's original use was and continues to be a gas station. ©2002 Urban RCSOUCCe Group - A division of Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc. 17 Cil : L i- V ,dam LG 1 L L C1 1 L 03- 884 This represents a poor urban condi- tion in which parking directly abuts the sidewalk. This is not only aes- thetically poor, but also presents a safety concern to both vehicles and pedestrians. This intersection is filled with un- necessary street clutter. Power lines crossing these intersections could be placed underground, and the pole removed to allow for more pedestrian space at these tight areas. This Zone includes buildings of varying densities which offer zero -lot line relationships to the corridor. This relationship is enhanced by the active ground floor use of these buildings which include: restaurants, shops and businesses, all adding to the pedestrian activity at the street level. The Banyan trees along this Zone offer splendid shade along the corridor. The on -street parking provides a good buffer between the travel lanes and the sidewalk. The mix of uses, density and scale of the buildings along this Zone enhance the urban character along this corridor. 0 This grass area can be turned into out- door seating for the existing restaurant. Such modifications will increase pedes- trian activity and bolster revenues for local merchants. lope 5 [SW 2209 Street) SW 27th Ave to SW 32nd Ave ZONE 6 ZONE 5 ZONE 4 ZONE 3 ZONE 2 ZONE 1 ' CORXL WAIS 13th ST W W W W W AA"'' W a a a a ra "-' ' CORAL WAY (SW 22nd ST) Characteristics 6 QaaltW A. Valley gutters separate on -street parking from travel lanes B. Mixed use office/condos/commercial buildings — up to 8 stories C. District is anchored by two bank towers. At 271 Ave - Total Bank and at 32nd Ave —Terra Bank D. Some in-line bus stops, some bus lanes near intersections - - ©2.0()2 Urban Resource Group, - A division of Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc. 03- 884 We 6 (SW 22nd Street) SW 32nd Ave to SW 77th Ave ® ZONE ZONE ZONES ZONE2 ZONE/ ',.''U�jL_� ORAL WA W W W 14"SW $N' 13th 8T � f�r 04 ✓� CORAL WAY (SW 22nd ST) Characteristics 6 Qualities A. Three traffic lanes west bound, two east bound — as opposed to the rest of the corridor that has two west bound and two east bound with on street parking on both sides. B. No on -street parking C. Larger buildings -set back further from ROW D. Poor pedestrian movement E. Bus stops are in-line F. Some smaller commercial on south side G. 37t1 Ave — major commercial bisector and gateway 1 Corner of SW 33 Ave. The Miracle Center is currently un- dergoing major renovation. This enormous structure has some good urban qualities such as structured parking and proximity to the right-of-way, but the scale, fenestration, and interaction with the street are inappropriate. This newly built residential tower engages the corridor very poorly by placing the garage in front of the building along Coral Way. The tower is set back over 100ft from the right-of-way. A. This Zone is the entryway to the City of Miami from Coral Gables and West Dade. Intersection with NW 37th Avenue offers good oportunities for a celebrated gateway into the City. B. The Banyan trees along this Zone offer splendid shade along the corridor. D. The mix of uses, density and scale of the buildings along this Zone enhance I the urban character along this corridor. 3 Cora[ Way Beautification /\`aster Plan a Design Standards City of Miam-i © 2002 Urban Resource Group - A division of Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc. Along the north side of the corridor, the existing cano- py trees (Live Oaks) offer _ some shade to pedestrians _ along that edge. This can be enhanced by planting another row of Live Oaks on the south side of the sidewalk, creating a grove `f of trees along that side. B SULD NG BL BUS LANE C/G CURB AND GUTTER LV LANDSCAPE VERGE M MEDIAN P PARKING S SHOULDER SW SDEWALK AREA T TRANSITION ZONE TL TRAVEL LANE AREA 140T AFFECTED BY STUDY Oft loft loft GRAPHIC SCALE Existing Cross Section The typical cross section for this Zone is comprised of a 5ft sidewalk and 5ft landscape verge on the north side of the corridor. Followed by three west bound travel lanes, each 9ft lin in width. The median is 14ft Sin at this loca- tion. The east bound travel lanes are l lft 6in wide. The landscape verge on the south side of the cor- ridor is loft 6in wide, while the sidewalk on this side is only 5ft wide. �-4`- :u - Part I - =t- Plan 03- 884 Site Specific [Xistill cluditills The following pages illustrate specific case studies along the corridor. These case studies are categorized by use: commercial, residential, commercial pads, and office. Continuous frontages The deliberate continuity of a street facade becoming a background for the definition of the public realm is a way in which order and continuity can be captured in a street providing a calm urban fabric. The buildings become the background of the great street of Coral Way. Mixed Use Building This is an excellent example of a commercial building with residential units to the back. ate? Win The passage (paseo) leading to the rear of the property is a good precedent to follow. f The pedestrian realm is not interrupted by the vehicular entry to the rear parking. Simplr Mile Elements The symmetrical well proportioned street facade of this storefront contributes to a sober and harmonious street elevation for the Coral Way corridor. 03- 884 Pedestrian Protection form the Elements An awning as a part of the frontage of a commercial building provides enough shelter to the passerby acting as a friendly gesture to cover the pedestrian from rain and sun. This encourages the visitability of a thriving commercial center. Modern Vernacular The character of this building with it's original stone unpainted through the years shall be encouraged to remain. These architectural elements of the past are important to maintain the original built environment of Coral Way as a point of reference and as historical continuity for future development. Boarding Up of Buildings The use of security overhead metal doors in the storefront discourages pedestrian activity during after hours. This building needs to respond to the pedestrian at all hours of the day so that a sense of security is fostered in the neighborhood. Mixed Use Buildings Commercial -office The harmonious yet distinct entrance and storefront of these two different stores are well coordinated within the street elevation of this building. There is a clear definition of the commercial and office components of the building. The small scale continuous band of commercial signs add to a harmonious uniform appearance. More Street fenestration Needed Although this building is simple and of the same kind of character found in neighboring buildings, it needs to have more participation with the public realm in its fenestrations. Coral Way 60111111 Character Most of the commercial buildings on Coral Way are one-story and of masonry construction. The continuous storefront windows are of clear glass. The use of metal security bars discourage the appearance of a perceived secure neighborhood and therefore shall be discouraged. Existing Conditions of Buildings The development of businesses along the Coral Way corridor has evolved through the years within the framework of the existing buildings. When new businesses open and restore the vacant buildings they shall maintain their original character for the sake of continuity of a harmonious streetscape. Cora[ Way Beautification Master Plan & Design Standards, City of Miami © 2002 Urban Resource Group -A division of Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Awuiugs as a Design Element The fact that businesses are next to each other does not mean that they have to compete visually to get the most attention. When a continuous awning is used for utilitarian purposes and designed in a continuous manner, albeit the differences of commercial spaces, the pedestrian environment can be enhanced. Corner Conditions At the ends of the blocks where it is appropriate for buildings to be designed in such a way that they re-inforce the corner. The simple gesture of this building curving to accommodate to the sidewalk accomplishes this successfully. Residential Image far Commercial Business The character of a commercial building shall reflect the function of the building. If offices are the function of the building, not residential, this is what the building should reflect to the public realm. urban frontage Commercial buildings that are set back from the street create a residual space in the front yard that is not of an urban nature. lire/ Warty The commercial use in the ground floor and the living or office use above provides a mixed-use building type that reinforces human activity after hours. This encourages a sense of security for the neighborhood that fosters a lively interactive neighborhood. Appropriate Entry to Building This building appropriately deals with the ground floor garage by articulating the frontage as if it was an arcade. This gesture in the building's design give a more human scale that is compatible with a street beautification intent. No Modern frontages The simple lines of this building shall be considered an organizational basis for the continuous and cohesive street frontage. Cora[ Way Beautification Master Man & Desi �.� City of Miami © 2002 Urban Resource Group -A division of Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc. city, but Busy JI structure of the compasses the different spaces in a unified way. y of canopies , signage w treatments defy a er. cold Continuity, but Busy Although not an overly beautiful building, the simplification of the materials, signage and color could make a contribution to this building for it to become a contributing street frontage defining the public realm in a calm and serene way. Simple Uesigu but loo Many Images The clean and sober lines of this simple commercial building are worth being noted. The problem arises in the disorganized manner in which the awnings, signs, bars in the windows and all sorts of attachments have been incorporated through time without cohesiveness. Standards 1 _C} L�l �. t -h lIl r_ �l��l,`s 03- 884 Art Deco Apartment Building The original design intent of these buildings reflects the South Florida vernacular architecture of the times when these buildings were built. This character further enhances the authenticity and historical significance of preserving them to their original condition. Special care shall be given to these contributing buildings to preserve for future generations the character of Miami as it was in the times these buildings were constructed. Simple Masonry Building These kinds of buildings are characteristic of South Florida vernacular architecture. Most of these apartment buildings serve the public of diverse economic levels to mix in a common neighborhood. The simple lines, high wall to window ratio respond to climatic characteristics without the need of mechanical systems for air circulation. Steady Rhythm of Solids and Veils The continuous urban structure that these apartments present to the public realm is an excellent example of a well defined public space. Urban centers that consist of residential buildings, such as these should respond urbanistically to their appropriate location within the Zone they belong to. Authentic Materials This building consists of its original building materials for its decoration and style. The use of these materials shall be encouraged to be maintained in their original state. This only serves to preserve the character of these neighborhoods giving them a sense of place recognizable of its place of origin, Miami. 03` 884 large Setback with Parking Garage The building's disposition within the site destroys a walkable environment. The setback of the building, and the residual bermed greenspace contribute to the disconnection between the living units and the street. This provides a very poor neighborly frontage. 'T Streets are the Most Pedestrian friendly se where a building is one is located along et, the frontage of the hall directly engage rian. In this example, rk under the building lestroys this very design criteria. Parking Buildings Frooting the Street The character of buildings that unfortunately have dedicated the ground floor to parking is a non contributing characteristic that shall be totally avoided. In such cases where these situations exist, landscaping may be the only treatment to block out the location of unpleasant views. Inappropriate Frontages with Gardens The character of a building's placement and treatment of addressing the public realm shall be compatible with the urban Zone in which the building is located. The excessive suburban -like front garden setting is not appropriate in this Zone. Cora[ Way Beautification /vlaster Pfan ai, Design Standards City of ;ami © 2002 Urban Resource Group - A division of Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc. Commercial Pads The pedestrian connectivity, in a commercial pad, as these stores are typically referred to, shall be of the utmost importance since the car is more prominently addressed in these commercial locations. A remedial street frontage suggestion would be to have a low wall with appropriate planting and potential seating. This would direct the pedestrian environment back to the continuation along the thoroughfare of Coral Way. fast food Places can Conform to Appropriate Standards Careful consideration to overdone elements of a commercial building such as this shall be addressed in a set standard. Curb appeal in favor of the public realm shall be of primary concern and not to the individual buildings calling too much attention to themselves. Cora[ Way Beautification Master Man a Desi City of Miami © 2002 Urban Resource Group - A division of Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc. Commercial Pads The overemphasized parking and vehicular circulation dominates the pedestrians activity. Careful design standards shall be implemented in such places so that a renewed sense of pedestrian connectivity is encouraged throughout the Coral Way thoroughfare. Appropriate Planting and Signage In favor of the comfort of walking along this building, care shall be taken to increase the canopy of trees protecting the pedestrian from the sun. Signage, only meant to direct the attention of the vehicular traffic and not the pedestrian, shall be reduced in size following a standard to further re-inforce the public realm. Standards ommucl.d Pads _ CLAI L A f V_, CU tean Parking at Ground floor Car storage fronting a main street creates uninhabitable space that is not conducive to a pedestrian friendly environment. The lack of a sidewalk for pedestrian use further discourages a connectivity between blocks. Car Park Backing to Right of Way The characteristics of this parking lay -out are not conducive to a lively and safe space. If an elderly person or a child is walking down the sidewalk, the potential of an accident is imminent. Detach Buildings from the Public Realm This building demonstrates an ineffective way to deal with residual spaces that are not clearly demarcated as private or public. The high obtrusive metal fence makes a hostile gesture towards the public realm. Poor frontage The lack of a pedestrian friendly connection between this building and the public realm is an example what needs to be improved in the master plan of Coral Way. The elements that discourage connection are 1. Fencing between storefront and sidewalk. 2. The lower level of the storefront below the sidewalk. 3. Utilitarian screens facing the frontage. aures is "A" Streets r main thoroughfares ost important to pedestrian friendly L It is highly to have parking [ext to these streets he detrimental effect fabric they produce. Non Conforming Architectural Attachments The simple original architectural character of this building has been lost with newer additions that are not compatible with the original design. Visually responding to the adjacent buildings shall be encouraged so that there is a seamless link to the surrounding neighboring structure. Building frootages The inappropriate suburban condition of the front yard of this building is not conducive to the urban setting in which the building is located. Use of appropriate urban characteristics of paving and planting shall be encouraged. tale I cut, narrow sidewalk, g signs and non d canopies make this .n trajectory unfriendly Nigh Planters Providing Separation The isolation of the sidewalkcreated by the barrier of the planter destroys the potential interaction of the building with the public realm. Terraced planters incorporating seating walls should be encouraged for areas in grade separation. Inappropriate Parking lining the Public Realm This exposed parking lot does not contribute to a safe pedestrian environment. Too much emphasis is given to easy access for the car at the expense of the pedestrian. — City of Miami © 2002 Urban Resource Group -A division of Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Public Involvement A critical element of this master plan is the public involvement. The intent for the public involvement segment of this project is designed to obtain public input prior to the initial planning effort to identify opportunities and constraints. Later the public was invited to a design workshop to participate in the design process. Public input was gathered both during the analysis phase of the project through a public meeting held April 3, 2002, and in the initial design phase of the project during a design workshop held June 22, 2002. Stakeholder issues and visions were incorporated in the plan to insure that the design is inclusive of the needs and desires of the people who will be using the corridor the most. NOON, cow T o l\lli4 1 1i11p��`l'SnL��S Cp-(ION� �3ti� 5�'�1� i dcs`Kv�a�`ti11`uM1�t'nrh l;V�u. . ouc- pURPose' « "� csitce ari of 1^ � �tic1c�'n'ttinrt'�M15vmsn xm .9'00a m 110'Ju x P V'Afel5cs 8'3�a�, .10.4 00Sm 13teak 11 C.f�1''t' f' '% uric' 1Z• }yn� 5ma 10:44Sm. J"009 VO r,Nlnt,ev}`1� ,1 12:40am • !CA C 1�4`c`'ssi� .. hxiol; m , g:34�P L<o"1' StGe up{Joint „t 1 •,ODP fi . A:3p�Pm 411n 7 S,yeo 'FyRt�,n;tca�<� 1.cUs�n`�n ttai'�o dpi e,��t`a�^�tS S°�`4'�co ilu, oo e" � vii ldgtxvor lto atem-Af ° p An L CK'(.Vx0 R°¢tiot�o"4 t '' d 2°n eom�°t �a%'Niw de�comet as urba �el as cCto9'65 °4 }O�' 1►,'p�NG - { p°aa�"ota �5}Atm 11114- A CpRAl IVAV rz DOE, WF-w"I)Orhocc Nit: C1M ��AY Aprwt Mt' L OCA)jpN� O Up C PURPp E h'AC4 Z yo',t, Q, � enfify bra YOUco *r°AV�hU�: C &y'i�, t° Join w Drat Wa a u ganctr� With Coral pla, qs asn n , fo„ rm ?oY'a bib Nc C repten tsk�ro two?nr Ten Oas tho t�8'°oq f?f nB peptn'ea Of locv ywi act. �soJtetjent wnant 8'W e Ciry ea ar -iittR rays Gri'0' ert MgOat man, 2>ptd Tpgy ty gUertigR sy8ant j� Dtft** CcaA:ag M,Y. 'C4411,01 . HJ r,, all n .. Cora[WayBeautification Master Man & Design Standards - ` City of Miami © 2002 Urban Resource Group - n division or Kimley-Hom and Associates. Inc. e 1 i � 9— Pubf:[C- Involvement at 1 - Master Ma 03- 81 4 A, T 7 7,111' The illustrative master plan, shown here, establishes standards for the following streetscape and architectural elements: landscape enhancements, landscape lighting, sidewalk and crosswalk enhancements, street furniture, irrigation, gateway designs, Art in Public Places locations, awnings, signage, building colors, lighting, storefront transparency, arcades, mixed commercial -residential development opportunities, parking structures and parking lots. A detailed drawing of this plan at 50 scale can be found in Appendix `A' of this document. The concepts laid out in this master plan are enforced by the design standards, which establish detailed guidelines based on these concepts. VUVV NO left GATE WAY MAJOR INTERSECTION FLOWERING TREES CANOPY TREES EXISTING BANYAN TREES —� - _— Existing mall at the corner of SW 32nd Ave (Zone 6) 03- 884 NW comer of SW Ave and SWl3th, (Zone 1) Jit R` dile IL *7 it kibICIEW-5— # ALI • outdoor 4-0 % �O Jow ilk th 0 AMA w fir 4 f b J6 ZONE 3 A* k 4 Ai e 4, 141, rig ItA dr k4A 'r.rAN W. ZONE 1 residential (Zone 2) Ir 40 „-Z'F,ou �XIS'(INI�� GURB 1J I flifu� Dl” f K1 5 Ur ,OPO%b A> Design Concepts Primary design concepts for this Zone include: A. Increase sidewalk area to a minimum of 7ft. Curb line modifications are suggested in order to maximize pedestrian areas. B. Provide shade trees along both sides of the roadway within the landscape verge. C. Reduce the crossing widths along SW 2nd Ave and SW 15th Rd by establishing "bulb -outs" at these intersections. D. Provide an alternative cross section which incorporates a landscaped median. The primary design intent is to increase pedestrian space, the addition of the median limits this to a certain degree. n LK Proposed Cross Section - Option 1 Without Medians �?�3 f cd ` _01�tC� 11Cli-tills .v ' Pert t - Master PIC -In 03- 884 line 1(SW 13th Street) SW 1 st Avenue to 1-95 ZONE 6 ZONE 5 ZONE 4 ZONE 3 ZONE 2 ® �. W Q W Q W W Q W gt i`r Q y\9��✓!' Q �y tA+f M � H r y r G�JYf�I y f3/1 fp �✓/ _ CORAL WAY (SW xznaST) JZ� CAOCIoSIonS The intent for this Zone is to create a more pedestrian friendly corridor which will serve as connector piece to Brickell Avenue and eventually downtown Mi- ami. In order to do this, the following elements should be implemented: A. Sidewalks should be widened to a minimum of 7 ft. B. Shade trees should be planted on both sides of the street C. The major intersections should support safer pedestrian crossing and mobility. Proposed Cross Section - Option 2 With Medians .D 0Y SiUDY GRAPHIC SCALE Cora[ Way Beautification Master Man & Design Standards ww_� rami ion of Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc. City of M © 2002 Urban Resource Group - A divis We 2 [SW 3rd Ave] 1-95 to SW 12th Ave ZONE ZONE ZONE ZONE ZONE ZONE? W W BUILDING BL BUS LANE C/G CURB AND GUTTER LV LANDSCAPE VERGE M MEDIAN P PARKING S SHOULDER SW IDE SWALK AREA T TRANSITION ZONE TL TRAVEL LANE AREA NOT AFFECTED BY STUDY Oft pft 70ft GRAPHIC SCALE ` — CORAL WAY (SW 22nd ST) _,✓f' Conclusions The intent for this Zone is to enhance the "neighborhood" feel already dem- onstrated in this area by establishing the following elements: A. Enhance the landscape along the sidewalk areas. B. Provide a better defined layout for the corridor while preserving on -street parking and on-site parking. C. Providing safe crosswalks and sidewalk widths at a minimum of 7ft. VARIES _ B T I BW LV Design Concepts Primary design concepts for this Zone include: A. Enhance the neighborhood characteristic of this Zone by providing a landscape verge in which flowering trees and understory plant material can be located. B. Increase on -street parking where possible. C. Strengthen the continuity of the corridor. Primarily, this is achieved by emphasizing on -street parking along the corridor, and avoiding private parking directly abutting the right-of-way. D. Provide safe, pedestrian friendly crosswalks where possible. E. Increase sidewalk widths to a minimum of 7ft. Proposed Cross Section EXI57I/.P3 DAM TREE IN SOMMD MEDIAN WITH PROPOSED tINDERSTORT PLANTING NEW PEDESTR LfGNT POLES C0NDIi10N VARIES BETILEEN r V PAPoCIHG, LANDSCAPE AND 4 PEDESTRIAN AREA 4 0 -0' 12'-B' 34'-O� 12' 12�" 12' 0' S'I �2' 0' S' 0' T TL 7L M TL TL PlLv � LV 8W J�. T ' B Cora[Way Beautification /Master Plan Design Standards City of Miami © 2002 Urban Resource Croup - A division of Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc. LEGEND B BUILDING BL BUS LANE C/G CURB AND GUTTER LV LANDSCAPE VERGE M MEDIAN P PARKING S SHOULDER SW IDE SWALK AREA T TRANSITION ZONE TL TRAVEL LANE AREA NOT AFFECTED BY STUDY Oft pft 70ft GRAPHIC SCALE P 1V661r H 11SAeb,- Ft,I,MK� EK6TIH61 EV6(6 of-- To PTo RfrMH Tom_ –ai�t – Aa; t -r � $La i 0— 884 fDRK14(4 ev41 Cr— I.Iyhif -10 plem?,IN �Q�sT�dN a�b NEW ED46 Of SFIXNbt-K Kow Desile Ceecepts Primary design concepts for these Zones include: A. Enhance the varying aspects of these Zones which range from commercial, office to residential by applying streetscape elements which enforce this character. B. Increase sidewalk widths to a minimum of 8'. C. Where appropriate, add landscaping to enhance the corridor's appearance. D. Provide for outdoor seating opportunities within the landscape verge and bulb outs. E. Provide up -lighting and understory planting in the medians to enhance the impact of the landscape both during the day and night. F. Increase on street parking where possible, while maintaining an ample amount of street trees and pedestrian spaces along the sides of the corridor. Proposed Cross Section 03- 884 LEGEND H BUILDING BL BUS LANE C/G CURB AND GUTTER LV LANDSCAPE VERGE N NEDIAN P PARKING S SHOULDER SW SIDEWALK AREA T TRANSITION ZONE TL TRAVEL LANE AREA NOT APPECTED BY STUDY t 20ft GRAPHIC SCALE lone 31 41 5 [SW 2211 St) SW 17th Ave to SW 32nd Ave ZONE 6 ZONE 5 ZONE 4 ZONE 3 ZONE 2 ZONE 1 'CORAL WAYi S SW 13th ST W LU w w w �,A,' LU P L C r n a � fn M N N N _ CORAL WAY (SW 22nd ST) CONNORS The intent for these three Zones is to enhance the quality of the built environment and spur additional commercial, residential and recreational use. To accomplish this: A. Sidewalks should be widened to a minimum of 8 ft. B. Enhance the overall appearance of the corridor by adding landscape and utilize up -lights along the medians to emphasize the Banyan trees. C. Provide opportunities for sidewalk use by the strategic placement of benches, and common areas that allow for everyday conversational use. O 1 9WP_ 74Q l 11T(51 b�br r_D E or an 4 M,MA" Cora[ Way Beautification Master Man g Design Standards .00� City of Miami -- © 2002 Urban Resource Group -A division of Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc. Zone 6 (SW 22nd Stj SW 32nd Ave to SW 37th Ave ® ZONE 5 ZONE 4 ZONE 3 ZONE 2 ZONE 1 4L—J ORAL WA l W W W W 11th ST 9 % L 'G `O�✓/tel N r r W fA f3/1 N �/J✓✓� CORAL WAY (SW 22nd STI The intent for this Zone is to enhance the appearance of the Zone to an area that will effectively serve as a western gateway into the city. In order to do this: A. The gateway design element should be implemented to physically denote the entryway into the city. B. Sidewalks should be enhanced by street trees and site furnishings to pro- vide greater use. C. Highlight the existing Banyan trees with uplighting. [AEnhance on Concepts primary design concepts for this Zone include: the varying aspects of this Zone which range from commercial and office to residential by applying streetscape elements which enforce this character. B. Increase sidewalk widths to a minimum of 8 feet on the south side. C. Provide canopy trees along the north side of the corridor between the travel lane and the pedestrian area to serve as a buffer. Street trees are placed in tree pits to allow the landscape verge to serve as an extension of the sidewalk. Combined, the landscape verge and the actual sidewalk will provide a total of 8ft of pedestrian space. D. Where appropriate, add landscaping to enhance the corridor's appearance. This may range from street trees in tree pits with understory planting, to decorative pots at major intersections and places of interest. E. Provide up -lighting and understory planting in the medians to enhance the impact of the landscape during both the day and night. Proposed Cross Section I WIWI" Coral Way Beautification Master Man & Desi City of Miami © 2002 Urban Resource Group - A division of Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc. LeGerw B BUILgNG BL BUS LANE C/G CURB AND QJTTER LV LANDSCAPE VERGE M MEDIAN P PARKING S SHOULDER SW SDEWALK ARM T TRANSITIOM ZONE TL TRAVEL LANE ARFA NOT AFFECTED BY STUDY On IDft 2D1t GRAPHIC SCALE Standards MOPOSt D -R& PI;DI~s'f91 W AM -11b - W Of If-b4m LDNt t0 ttNb-Iht posed -ond Part I m , V F [an 03- 884 Posswalk lesion (There are two main elements for crosswalk design: 11) Material - the crosswalk should be physically distinguishable from the rest of the intersection and clearly define the pedestrian Zone. Crossing distance - minimize the distance from road across the roadway by using bulb -outs and pedestrian refuges. major Intersection layout The following concepts should be applied in the design of the major intersections along Coral Way (refer to master plan on page for intersection locations): 1) When possible, increase pedestrian space in the corners by widening the sidewalk area. 2) Remove unnecessary "sidewalk clutter" by undergrounding or relocating power poles, and other vertical elements which can be placed elsewhere less obtrusively. Combine newsracks as shown to the right, move benches, trash receptacles, bike racks and transit shelters to the landscape verge. 3) Provide for safer pedestrian crossings by using different materials for the cross walks and by shortening pedestrian crossing distances where possible. A ��3=£ 884 Igloo t - Thrmoplastic Striping Thermoplastic striping is the least expensive way to delineate a crosswalk. Although this material is generally used for simple crosswalk striping, more decorative designs such as the one shown here are possible. Igloo 2 - Colored Concrete Colored concrete is an excellent material for ur- ban crosswalks. Rich colors and textures add a decorative character to the crosswalk while being durable, low maintenance and capable of sup- porting high traffic volumes. Sptioo 3 - Pavers Pavers are the most decorative of the three op- tions and are also the most expensive. Draw- backs to paver crosswalks include high installa- tion cost and ongoing maintenance as a result of heavy traffic. Pedestrian Refuge For wide crossings, such as the one shown in this image, it is desirable to have an area between vehicular lanes for pedestrian to safely stay and wait to cross. This `pedestrian refuge' can be beneficial in the design of the major intersections along Coral Way. Cora[ Way Beautification Master Man a Design Standards © 2002 Urban Resource Group - Adwis 1 am -i ion of Kirnley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Typical Corner Treatments Corners present many opportunities to create meaningful pedestrian spaces. While dimensions and adjacent uses of these corners will vary, both play a role in defin- ing what the corner layout should be. The following three (3) typical corner layouts are intended to show basic layout suggestions for the different urban conditions of the corridor. Beginning with the most urbanized option `A' to the more residential character option `C'. These three options address the range of conditions along Coral Way. Urban Corner - Zones 1, 3-1 This option can be associated most with higher density urban uses. The intent of this layout is to maximize congregation space. Landscape materials are placed in planter pots to both soften the space and help subdivide the space to allow for vari- ous users. This type of layout is preferable in front of a restaurant, cafe, school, and office building with ground floor activity. Bicycle racks, benches, trash receptacles, and newsracks can all be placed up against planters to emphasize an edge and give further definition and dimension to the space. Corner ramps should be wide, gradu- ally sloping down to meet the street elevation to allow for a heavy volume of foot traffic to pass. Transition Corner - lanes 1-6 This option represents a more balanced approach for laying out a sidewalk. Larger planter areas are encouraged to soften the hardscape material. Benches, trash re- ceptacles, bicycle racks, and newspaper racks can be placed adjacent to landscape areas as shown to both create semi -private gathering spaces while not impeding the pedestrian flow. In this option, the type of corner ramp utilized can vary depending on where along the corridor this corner is located, from the wide, flush type recom- mended for option `A' or the curb return type which is generally used for more resi- dential areas. Residential Corner - lone 2 This option is more appropriate for the residential neighborhoods including the Roads area. Landscape beds are the dominating feature of this layout type. Beds should include pockets where street furniture can be placed to create more intimate spaces. The corner ramp should reflect this idea by utilizing a curb return type of ramp which allows for landscape areas to flank either side of the ramps, thus providing more greenspace. i Ria f. - _ •.s .: t. # 4 =?1�1 }art- Urban corner Transition Corner Residential Corner x v T �K I x V-.4 y -;a­X= � t Y Cora[Way Beautification Master Man a Design Standards City of Miami © 2002 Urban Resource Group - A division of Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. i r - s Y" - ';'—VO LJ L. Part l - Master Mc -in 03- Gateway lesile During the initial community workshop a consensus was reached by the group in favor of a "call to artists", for the purpose of a design competition for the gateway element of the corridor at the intersection of Coral Way and NW 37th Ave. The participants of the workshop, which included the public, city representatives, design profession- als, and local artists discussed the importance of this gateway and the connection to public art. It is the intent of this document to present some viable examples from other places that may relate to the future gateway along Coral Way. The images to the right represent such gateway examples. These gateway elements vary greatly in type, size, and form, but they all share some very important elements which make them successful entry features. These elements are: 1) Relates to the unique character of the space. 2) Relates to the specific scale of the area. 3) Serves as a beacon for attraction. 4) Gives the space an identifiable symbol or icon. - l 03_ M, � � 1 The image above shows a panoramic view of the existing conditions at the intersection of Coral Way and NW 37th Ave looking north. Miracle Mile is on the left in the image. Coral Way (SW 22nd St) is on the right in the image. The illuminated entry way feature for the Los Angeles International Airport is grand in scale and directed for not only those arriving at the airport by car, but also for those flying over by plane. Although at a much larger scale, the iconic purpose that the St. Louis Gateway Arch serves can be emu- lated at the street level in Coral Way. Public art is a very important element in the streetscape. Art work can serve as excellent entry way elements by giving the space a distinct symbol for the space. This entry feature in San Diego's historic gas lamp district is an excellent example of how the gate way element can relate to the area's character and scale. Cora[ Way Beautification Master Plan g Design Standards_ City of Miami © 2002 Urban Resource Group -A division of Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc. Public 6 Private Space Relationship Great urban places share many similar characteristics. The manner in which the pub- lic and private realm interact with one another is an extremely important dictator of the quality of an urban corridor. Great pocket parks like Paley Square in New York City or London's private "Mews" or small residential courts, exemplify this important relationship which is formed when the private sector recognizes the importance and necessity of public plazas and court yards that offer the pedestrian a change of pace from the bustle of the street. More than rest and repose, these places add to the rich- ness of the urban design context by increasing the variety of experiences encountered while being part of everyday urban life. In order to function properly the design of vest pocket parks and courtyards should include the following elements: Connection to Street: The space must connect to the street. A space can be inviting while maintaining security and protection. Maintaining the space on or near street level encourages a passerby to visit the space. Benches and other amenities at the entrance also add to the "inviting" qualities of a space. Natural Surveillance and lighting: A space should be well lit, and preferably should have windows from adjacent build- ings looking into the space. Emphasized by Jane Jacobs, this concept of "natural sur- veillance" is key to providing a sense of safety to a public space. Not only does it help the public area, but users of the adjoining buildings also benefit by having the public space become a visual part of their indoor environment. Seating and Shade: Seating and shade are a must. Many urban plazas of the 7Os and 8Os such as the Chris- tian Science Center in Boston or Harlequin Square in Denver focused too much on the overall form but little on the practical use (and user) of the space. Great public spaces need plenty of seating choices like moveable seats (as in Paley Park) and plenty of shade, especially in the South Florida climate. Edge Definition: Edge treatment defines the boundaries of the space. Without proper definition, a space becomes a void, and loses its inviting qualities. A user must feel some sense of spacial definition and form in order to feel comfortable using the space. Buffering harsh wall with landscape and/ or seating, providing ground floor activity along some edges of the space can insure that the space maintains a strong sense of definition while adding to the diversity of the design. Additional Elements: Additional elements are always a plus. Water features, public art, domino tables, and street vendors add to the diversity of a space, thus attracting a greater variety of users and use. GOOD ENAMPIES... Design Elements Connection to street Paley Park, NY - A "classic." This little vest pocket park has all the key ingredients: natural surveillance, lighting, seating, shade, and even a waterfall. Paley Park is located in the heart of busy Manhattan, but it feels and sounds like a separate room where one can read, eat, or just relax. Greenacre Park, NY - Much like Paley Park, Greenacre Park is another one of New York City's great vest pocket parks. Pri- vately owned, this park is gated and closed at nights (another important consideration based on security reasons). Greenacre Park offers plenty of seating, shade, serenity and escape from busy New York transit, and like Paley Park, the cascading water drowns the sounds of buses and horns, adding to the tranquility of the space. 41-7 i Bad Examples Ir '`��c� _ i�iY° �tLF- _ � ,�'•''_ � it - . Natural Surveillance/ lighting Cora[ Way Beautification Master Plan k Design Standards -` City of Miami © 2002 Urban Resource Group - A division of Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc. NaMequin Plaza, Colorado -Too much emphasis on form and little on practical use, this infamous space, although at a larger scale than Coral Way, provides a clas- sic example of a lack of the key elements. No seating, no shade, no privacy and an overall poorly defined area make the user feel lost and uneasy walking through the space, much less staying in it. This plaza has since been demol- ished and replaced with a much "greener" design. Book Atlantic Plaza, Miami - Lo cated at the intersection of Coral Way and NW 32nd Ave. This private plaza has potential to become a great amenity to the Coral Way Corridor. The plaza is currently a few steps below the street level, and offers very poor seating opportunities. The edges of the space are harsh and the small Tabebuia trees offer little shade. Yet, the space is at a very busy intersection, and could provide a great pedestrian ame- nity adding to the revitalization of the corridor. Seating 6 Shade Edge Definition Additional Elements 1`4,Ica.t_.'t3t�-Ll:�=a:3 3 -_-• __-_ �. ��il-t. ,l Es` -. 43— 884 Public 6 Private Spice Relationship Throughout the study area, there are several opportunities to create meaningful pocket parks and plazas. These oportunities have been listed in the technical lay- out section of this study (Apendix `A'). It is the intent of this study to incorporate these spaces when possible into the overall design of the corridor. An existing lot or yard can be transformed into a meaningful urban space by incorporating the ele- ments presented in this report. This study identifies several areas which have the physical potential to make such a transformation. Obviously, financial, ownership and parking considerations will play a large role in determining which areas can and will be utilized for public use. The illustration to the right is of an "ideal' plaza or pocket park situation. The ele- ments have been numbered to correspond to the description below. These spaces throughout the corridor ought to include most if not all of these elements in order to provide a quality urban space that will add to the diversity and vitality of the Coral Way corridor. 1 - Controlled entry and exit points 2- Edge definition by landscaping and seating opportunities 3- Different bench options 4 - Moveable table and chairs 5- Shade trees 6 - Match paving to street or vise versa 7- Adjacent sidewalk cafe or restaurant 6 - On -street parking 9 - Rear yard parking 16 - Adjacent buildings providing "natural surveillance" 11 - Water feature 12- Gate with public art (gate may not be necessary depending on layout) 13 -Sidewalk connected to plaza by paving, seating and additional uses 14 - vendor(s) 03- 884 In order to encourage the private sector to develop such amenities along the corridor, the public sector can initiate several types of incen- tive mechanisms for private sector developers and property owners to allocate a portion of the property to public use. Such mechanisms can include: density bonuses, FAR increases, tax incentives, impact fee abatement, certain variances, and a streamlined approval process. Another possibility is for the city to purchase or lease/purchase some of these lots which are now underutilized and develop them into public places. Most likely, a combination of these mechanisms and strategies will work to insure that the public has an adequate amount of public open space along the Coral Way corridor. Corm Way Beautification Master Man & Design Standards City of Miami -- © 2002 Urban Resource Group - A division of Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Plant Palette ( 1 d 7 No. scientific Name Common Nome flower color Alonmiq Averill Ase/form location Cordia sebestena Geiger Tree orange most of year 15 - 25' Flowering tree Along major intersecting irregular trunk and spread streets with Coral Way Y Tabebuia Pink Tabebuia pink early spring 15'- 35' Flowering tree slender pyramid Verge along heterophylla Zone 2 canopy 3 Tabebuia Tabebuia purple, rose fall to spring g - 20 45' Flowering tree open, spreading Vergealong impetiginosa purple Zone canopy 4 Simarouba Paradise Tree yellow spring 20 - 45' Flowering tree Along major intersecting glauca w ide spreading streets with canopy r 5 Cassia fistula Cassia yellow late summer & 15 - 30' Flowering tree broad canopy, Verge along early fall low branching Zone 2 A Lagerstroemia Crepe Myrtle white, red, spring, late fall 15 - 25' Flowering g tree Verge along indica purple multi-trunk, upright Zone 2 and open canopy Delonix regia Royal Poinciana red June and July 30- 50' Flowering tree ong ve near intersection wide spreading with Coral Way canopy A Jacaranda Jacaranda purple early spring 25 - 55' Flowering tree Along major intersecting acutifolia irregular and loose streets with canopy. A Plumeria Frangipani white, yellow, spring and 15 - 20' Flowering tree acuminata pink summer broad crowned, Verge along low canopy Zone 2 19 Swietenia Mahogany N/A N/A 30 - 65' Shade tree Option `A' mahagoni broad cylinder verge along to oval canopy Zones 1, 3 - 6 11 Quercus Live Oak N/A N/A 30 - 50' Shade tree Option `B' virginiana wide spread w/ verge along horizontal branches Zones 1, 3 - 6 llum Beauty Leaf N/A N/A 25 - 60' Shade tree semi-pyramidal to Option `C' Lantillanuin wide columnar verge along g g Zones 1, 3 - 6 City of Miami Pot o - Aar ter � a � ©i00a Urban Resource Group - A division of Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc. , 03- 884 No. SCION Name Commoo Name flower Color Bloomiog overall use/form location 13 Archontophoneix King Alexander N/A N/A 15 - 25' single, upright, gray all Zones alexander Palm trunk, 6-10' leaves at major stately accent intersections clustering palm, all Zones 14 Chrysalidocarpus Cabada Palm N/A N/A 15 - 30' ringed green trunk at major cabadae 8-10'leaves intersections single, upright all Zones 15 Thrinax radiata Florida Thatch N/A N/A 15 - 20' trunk,4-5' wide at major Palm palmate leaves intersections stately, single, all Zones 10 Phoenix Medjool Date N/A N/A 25 - 35' upright, coarse trunk. at major dactylifera Palm 12-15' leaves intersections 11 Roystonea elata Florida Royal N/A N/A up to 80' tall, single, upright, all Zones at major Palm gray trunk intersections 10' leaves 1B Veitchia Montgomery N/A N/A 15 - 35' slender gray trunk all Zones at major montgomeryana Palm 10' leaves intersections 10 Veitchia winin Winin Palm N/A N/A up to 40' single, upright gray all Zones at major trunk, 10' leaves intersections planting pots Z� Hibiscus sta. Hibiscus purple, pink, all year 8 - 15' small flowering at intersections orange tree - verges along Zone 2 planting pots Y1 Plumbago Plumbago velvet all year up to 5' massing, accent/ along verges and `Imperial blue' shrub median noses accent- understory 22 Codiaeum Croton N/A N/A 4 - 6' variable in color along verges - variegatum and shape all Zones 23 Tradescantia pallida Purple Queen N/A N/A u to 1.5' p groundcover - understory along verges - `purpurea' low, spreading all Zones understory Y4 Al mia zerumbet p' Shell Ginger S N/A N/A up to 6' accent planting along variegata loose, irregular verges - all Zone ,,,, ,, ,-rl � , Cora[ Way Beautification Master Man a Design Standards City of Miami P _-" t _ ©2002 Urban Resource GrOUP - A division of Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc. 03- 884 JO ji qa'r - - x No. scientific Name Common Name flower Color oloomioo overall Use/form location 25 Philodendron Xanadu N/A N/A up to 3' massing/ understory `xanadu' compact, along verge - dark green all Zones 20 Euphorbia milii Crown of Thorns red all year up to 3' massing, accent/ understory shrub along verge - all Zones 21 Pentas Egyptian Star lavender, pink, all year up to 4' perennial, accent/ planting pots/ red, white, shrub median noses planting pots/ 20 Bougainvillea Dwarf pinkish red fall to summer up to 3' massing, accent understory along `Helen Johnson' verges 20 Jasminum Downy Jasmine N/A N/A up to 3' hedge, massing understory multiflorum palong verge - all Zones accent- understory along 31 Bromiliad Bromiliad varies varies 1.5 - 4' clusters or verges/ median stand alone noses 31 Nephrolepsis Boston Fern N/A N/A 2 - 4' massing medians exaltata fern 32 Polypodium Strap Fern N/A N/A 2 - 4' massing medians phyllitidis fern 33 Nephrolepsis Sword Fern N/A N/A 1 - 1.5' massing medians biserrata fern 34 Polistychum Taeel Fern N/A N/A 1 - 1.5' massing medians polyblepherum fern 35 Microsorum Wart Fern N/A N/A 1 - 2' massing medians scolopendria fern 3o Nephrolepsis Macho Fern N/A N/A up to 4' massing medians biserrata `Mahco' fern qjW7 Cora[ Way Beautification Master P[a-n a Design Standards City of Miami @2002 Urban Resource Group -A division of Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc. t: i rt 9 -its to - l" [ 1� 03- 884 Furoiture Palette 03- 884 No. Model Manufacturer Color Material iiimeosions location I City approved City approved per City per City along verge areas newsrack manufacturer standards specifications - near major intersections P City approved City approved per City per City along verge areas bench with back manufacturer standards specifications 3 City approved bench City approved per City per City back of sidewalk without back manufacturer standards specifications along verge areas 4 City approved bench City approved per Ci P h' per City - near major with adversitement manufacturer standards specifications intersections 5 PI bicycle rack Landscape Forms polyurethane finish - match aluminum 116" L x 87" W along verge areas FPL light poles x 123" H s Kelidoscope Landscape Forms metal aluminum along verge areas Transit Shelter powdercoat corners 67 -major FPL decorative approved FPL emerald green cast iron 25' overall intersections, b/w light pole manufacturer height seating areas and travel lanes $ Bollard Ironsmith polyurethane cast iron 3' height along verge areas finish - match 15"dia. base FPL light poles 9 City approved per City per City at current bus stop trash receptacle standards specifications locations C, - -- -f - ---r- City ©f Miami © 2002 Urban Resource Group - A division of Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Street Furniture layout The images presented here illustrate typical furniture layout combinations for both mid block and corner areas along the corridor. Although only two different scenarios are shown for each, there are many more opportunities to arrange the street furniture according to the specific needs of a certain area of the corridor. For example, in front of a residential building, a bike rack would be very desirable, or in front of a busy com- mercial corner office building, a news rack would be more appropriate. Regardless of the furniture combination, the following guidelines should be implemented in the layout of the street furniture along the corridor: A. Face benches either away or perpendicular from the parking and traffic lanes. If possible, separate benches from the travel lanes with landscaping. B. Include a trash receptacle adjacent to benches. C. Provide benches underneath shaded areas (i.e. a tree canopy, awning, etc.) D. Place all street furniture in an area which does not impede the flow of pedestrians. (refer to the design guidelines portion of this document for further input in this topic). E. Utilize bollards at busy intersections along the ADA ramp to add a measure of security for pedestrians waiting to cross. Additionally, add bollards to pedestrian refuge areas along the medians. F. Place at least two benches and two trash receptacles on both sides of a block through the corridor, except for blocks. Relationship to Abutting Private Sector Uses In addition to these criteria, it is necessary to also include uses and respective ele- ments that are occurring in the private realm abutting the street. The examples on the right illustrate some possible scenarios for a sidewalk cafe. The top example looks at placing the street furniture in an area where the cafe tables are kept within the arcade. The scenario at the bottom looks at the possibility of having the tables encroach into the public sidewalk, while providing for a clear path for pedestrians within the arcade. Typical Layout or Cora[Way Beautification Master Man & Desi r- -7 of Miami © 2002 Urban Resource Group - A division of KirnIey-Horn and Associates, Inc. Standards Pay t � - =)Ian t ,03- hS The lighting demonstration was done on site. This image dusk before any lights were mounted. lightiRg Banyan tree at As part of the master planning process, a lighting demonstration was held on site to illustrate how the Banyan trees would appear at night. Two types of lamps were used in the demonstration. The first lamp, metal halide, gives off a white light. The second lamp, high pressure sodium, gives off a yellow light. High pressure sodium lamps are used in the newly installed light poles along the corridor. This causes the corridor to have a yellow ambient light, therefore it proved more effective to have the white light of the metal halide uplighting in the median to balance the yellow hue of the corridor light poles. The metal halide makes both the trunk and the foliage of the Banyan Trees stand out tremendously against the yellow backdrop. Both the structure of the trunk and the detail of the foliage are brought to life by the white light. Several different lighting schemes including projection angles, number of fixtures, height of fixtures, and lamp types were tested. It was concluded that the most effective lighting scheme varies per tree because the size of trees vary greatly. Therefore the design of the lighting should be done on a tree to tree basis in order to maximize the efficiency, the visual effect of the lights, and cost savings. _ Ck: 1 93- 884 This image shows two trees selected for the demonstration near SW 27th Ave. Notice the yel- low ambient light produced by the newly installed light poles that use mercury vapor lamps. were used for this particular set of trees. Notice how the white light balances the ambient yel- low light of the corridor. Same trunk with high pressure sodium lamp. This lamp brings out the true color of the trunk but is drowned out by the existing high pressure sodium ambient light. Trunk with metal halide light. The metal halide brings out the structure of the trunk. Coral Way Beautification IvAaster P[an & Design Standards City of Maml © 2002 Urban Resource Group -A division of Kintley-Horn and Associates, Inc. The drawing at the bottom illustrates a typical fixture distribution. The number of light fixtures will vary based on the size of a tree and distance between trees. To the immediate right, a similar fixture is used in a median to up light a Royal palm. The fixture is placed on a metal stanchion which is secured with a concrete footer to limit vandalism opportunities. The height of the fixture itself is approximately A. This allows for the surrounding plant material to hide the fixture almost completely. In ad- dition, special louvers are placed on the fixtures to avoid glare on vehicles along the adjacent travel lanes. This sketch illustrates the general placement of the fixtures along the median between two trees. Because the height, canopy spread and size of the trees vary significantly, the number of fix- tures, angle of fixture, and spread in between fixtures will vary accordingly. Similar fixture placed on metal stanchion in a planted median. Am Housing: Constructed of heavy gauge, die formed, 5052 aluminum, with less than 1 % copper content. Seams are continuously welded and unitized. Lens/Door Assembly: Constructed of heavy gauge, die formed, 5052 aluminum, with less than 1 % copper content. Mitered and welded frame secures the tempered thermal and shock resistant borosilicate glass, sealed to the housing with high temperature, medium density, dosed cell silicone gasket. Door frame attached and secured by stainless steel cam fasteners, which operate without the use of tools, for ease of relamping. INTEGRA-POST Mounting: Heavy die cast aluminum knuckle with less than 1 % copper content. Knuckle attached to cast brass stanchion cap. Hardware: All external hardware is stainless steel. Finish: Polyester powder coated finish, fired at high temperatures to produce a durable weatherproof coating. Color: Bronze is standard; silver, black and custom color matching is also available. Please consult factory for availability. Reflector/Internal Louvers: Electropolished and anodized high purity aluminum, coilzak or equivalent. Internally mounted aluminum louvers Stanchion: 4" X 4" square poltruded composite post. for precise cutoff to reduce glare. Extremely durable and resistant to chemicals and weathering. Finished to match fixture. Remote Mounted Ballast: Constant wattage autotransformer encapsulated ballast. 120/277 dual voltage only. Available in metal halide, high pressure sodium and mercury vapor. Ballast mounts inside stanchion on removable plate. The cut sheet shown here is of the proposed fixture type to be used for uplighting the Banyan trees. The metal stanchion is encased in a concrete footer to limit vandalism. TU 94 jr_� Cora[ Way Beautification /Master Plan a Design Standards City o f Mi ami— nommommo�mw� © 2002 Urban Resource Group - A division of Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc. =r' L 03- 884 preliminary Opinion of Probable Construction Cost BASE OPTION Lighting: Landscape uplightinc Street Furniture: Bicycle racks. trash receptacle, Hardscape: Standard gray concrete sidewalk. concrete slab for artwork in medial Softscape: Canopy trees, flowering trees. cluster of small palms. understory planting. precast concrete planting pots. planting soil, rootbarrier. tree pits, structural Crosswalk: Thermoplastic striping (FDOT base improvements Irrigation: Bubblers. spray heads. laterals. sleeving main line controllers. valves. and miscellaneous ite Zone 1 (SW 1st Ave to 1-95) Zone 2 (1-95 to SW 12th Ave) Zone 3 (SW 12th Ave to SW 17th Ave) Zone 4 (SW 17th Ave to SW 27th Ave) Zone 5 (SW 27th Ave to SW 32nd Ave) Zone 6 (SW 32nd Ave to SW 37th Ave) Total By Category I ALTERNATIVES ENHANCEMENT CATEGORIES Lighting Street Furniture Hardscape Softscape Crosswalks Irrigation $0 $15.000 $159.000 $298,000 $0 $12.000 $260.000 $56.000 $749.000 $881.000 $0 $64.000 $126,000 $19.000 $152,000 $236.000 $0 $31.000 $195.000 $41.000 $316.000 $462.000 $0 $52.000 $104.000 $23.000 $152,000 $246.000 $0 $31,000 $123.000 $27.000 $157.000 $401.000 $0 $36.000 $808,000 $181,000 $1,685,000 $2,524,000 $0 TT $226,000 JtfU,LSUU JIO.IVV JI VV,JVV--- $889,000 $200,000 11 $1,854,000 11 $2,777,000 $0 11 $249,000 Lighting: Same as above Street Furniture: Same as above Hardscape: Upgrade sidewalk from standard gray concrete to colored concrete Softscape: Upgrade cluster of small palms at intersections to large decorative palms Crosswalk: Upgrade thermoplastic striping to colored concrete (Opt.1 ). Pavers (Opt.2) Irrigation: Same as Above Zone 1 (SW 1st Ave to 1-95) Zone 2 (1-95 to SW 12th Ave) Zone 3 (SW 12th Ave to SW 17th Ave) Zone 4 (SW 17th Ave to SW 27th Ave) Zone 5 (SW 27th Ave to SW 32nd Ave Zone 6 (SW 32nd Ave to SW 37th Ave Subtotal Total By Category ENHANCEMENT CATEGORIES Lighting Street Furniture Hardscape Softscape Crosswalks Irrigation $51,600 $697,000 S67,300 Option 1 Option $23.000 $37.000 $202.000 $319.000 $975.000 $912.000 $123.000 $178.000 Same as Base Option $212.000 $441.000 $246,000 $483,000 $36.000 $57.000 $58.000 $93.000 Same as Base Option $212,000 $257.000 $18.000 $29.000 $219.000 $422.000 $12.000 $20.000 $808,000 11 $181,000 $2,261,000 $2,639,000 $269,000 $415,000 11 $226,000 jtJu.duu ",Ia. IVV JLL V, IVV .Jc v.�,�vv - ------- - 1 - --- 1 $889,000 11 $200,000 11 $2,488,000 11 $2,903,000 11 $296,000 1 $457,000 11 $249,000 'Cost estimates DO NOT include the following items: Proposed gateway features. roadway paving, curb and gutter. drainage, milling and resurfacing. utili'lies, mobilization. design fees and permitting c 03- 884 �onfigency (10%) S48,400 $201,000.00 S56,400 $106,600 $55,600 574.400 Total By Zone I $2,211,000 $620,400 $1,172,600 $611,600 $818,400 $5.424.000 1 $59967,000 1 :�onfigeocy (10%) 1 Total By Zone - S6, 000 $577,000 $2 18.800.00 $2,609,000 $55.200 $726,000 107,400 $1,377,000 $51,600 $697,000 S67,300 $907,000 $6,893,000 $6,893,000 (10%) $6,600 S501,580.00 $133,320 5255,840 $126,460 S164,730 Total By Zone - Opt 2 $591,600 $2,946,580 $825,320 $1,560,840 $782,460 $1,011,730 $7,718,530 $7,719,000 Cora[ Way Beautification %'AasteT P[an & Design Standards 0"""W City o f / a- i © 2002 Urban Resource Group - A division of Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. fkA4. "4r + INTENT + URBAN COMPONENTS + REGULATING PLAN + CENTER Zone STANDARDS + GENERAL Zone STANDARDS + ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS 03- 884 intent The Standards for the Coral Way Beautification Master Plan are intended to provide a simple unifying codification system for the public spaces along the corridor. This is achieved through careful description of the three elements that give Coral Way its distinct identity and character - Urbanism, Streetscape and Architecture. These three elements are organized according to a single Regulating Plan. The Regulating Plan establishes standards for the various components of the urban context such as building facades, setbacks, sidewalk widths, landscape materials and street furniture, etc. In some instances, these elements overlap within the urban context. This overlap cre- ates opportunities for great urban design to flourish. It is the intent of this document to encourage such connections between urbanism/ streetscape and architecture, to insure that no one element completely dominates the urban context. This "balance" creates an environment that equally takes into account building placement, building design, pedestrian mobility, and project aesthetics. This critical "balancing act" forms the basis of the design standards. These guidelines do not dictate style, but rather establish an envelope that en- courages good design, representing a variety of architectural styles. urbanism Urbanism refers to the design elements that create the character of the built environ- ment, most notably the buildings. The Urban Standards for Coral Way describe sim- ply all the elements having to do with site disposition of buildings on their respective lots. Building lots are categorized by width at the frontage (along the street, or in the case of corner lots, two streets). Individually, buildings will meet specific criteria of setbacks, heights, and parking allowances. By ensuring that buildings meet the requirements of the Urban Standards, Coral Way will be left with an urbanism that permits continued development while ensuring long-term growth. Streetscape Streetscape refers to all of the design elements that exist from private property line to private property line, across any type of thoroughfare or right-of-way Zone. The streetscape standards codify all of the elements that form the character of a thoroughfare — furnishings such as benches and trash receptacles; fixtures such as bicycle racks, light poles and tree pits, finishes such as sidewalk paving and curb and gutter; and plantings, such as hedges, street trees and parks or gardens. Coral Way is a complex urban corridor, rich in urban diversity and character. The Streetscape Standards for Coral Way serve to honor some of this complexity, while delivering simple consistency. Where complexity provides the unique character and style of the corridor, it is the consistency that provides comfort at the human scale. This balance is achieved through the careful selection and arrangement of all the elements that make up the streetscape. Architecture Architecture refers to the elements that are arranged to create the character of individual, private buildings. The Architectural Standards for Coral Way are intended to be a descriptive set of elements that work together to give a consistent character to the entire corridor. It is not important that all the buildings look the same, but it is important that not every building be so different that there is no consistency. Too much similarity belies Coral Way's complexity and character, while too much variance dismisses human authenticity. The Architectural Standards for Coral Way, therefore, are intended to provide a short list of suitable materials and arrangements of elements that will promote a consistent architectural vocabulary. These elements and materials have been selected according to their consideration of the climate of the region, response to current architectural practice and the history of Brickell Village The Standards are intended to offer an easy-to-use, concise and effective set of standards that protect the public reahn as a safe and comfortable human environment within Coral Way. To that end, the design standards portion of this document is divided into two distinct Zones that are controlled by a single Regulating Plan. Each Zone possesses a slightly different character and level of intensity. These Zones are known as the Coral Way CENTER, and the Coral Way GENERAL. Within these Zones, all of the elements of Streetscape, Urbanism and Architecture are organized using the same parameters, thus facilitating the proper placement of all the elements that build the character. The Coral Way Streetscape, Urban and Architectural Standards make use of the Zones to determine the appropriate degrees of development and the appropriate collection and distribution of all urban elements. The Zones are essentially a varying scale of urban intensity. At one end of the transect is the Rural Preserve, which consists of natural areas that ideally should never be developed. The Everglades, a federally -protected park, would be an example of Rural Preserve. At the other end of the Zone is the Core, which consists of the highest intensity of development and also includes the widest range of possible uses in the closest proximity. Downtown Miami's Central Business District is a local example of Core. Between the two ends of the transect are four additional Zones (from less intense to more): the Rural Preserve, the Edge, the General, and the Center. The Zones help to define the proper standards for each component of the urban elements (street furnishings, landscape material, widths, setbacks, etc.). By defining areas according to the Zones, it is easier to distribute these elements in their proper context. Coral Way represents two of the six Transect Zones: CENTER, and GENERAL. nru-rrr� %rMlm i Mm GENERAL UEN I EF ZONES MN" ZME-3 CORAL WAY' SW 13th ST �P I 00 CORAL WAY (SW 22M ST) Cora[ Way Beautification Master Man a Design Standards City of Miami © 2002 Urban Resource Group - A division orKimley-Hom and Associates, Inc. Part 11- C a t _ r � 03— 884 Urban Components The following components are subject to the design standards set forth in this doc- ument. The components that include the abutting private buildings and lots, the transition area between the building and the sidewalk, the sidewalk, the landscape verge, the buffer area where parallel parking occurs, the roadway and the median form the corridor. Each component must be analyzed separately, yet must relate to one another to insure a cohesive design throughout the corridor. For the roadway segment, refer to FDOT standards. The extent of median related improvements include groundcover landscape, up -lighting, and the preservation of the existing Banyan trees. Median widths are not being modified as part of this docu- ment. ROADWAY (NIC) j MEDIAN j ROADWAY (NIC 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 6 ELEMENTS OF THE DESIGN STANDARDS ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS t URBANISM STANDARDS STREETSCAPE STANDARDS URBAN COMPONENTS 1 BUILDING 2 TRANSITION AREA 3 SIDEWALK 4 LANDSCAPE VERGE 5 BUFFER AREA 6 ROADWAY 7 MEDIAN 03- 884 5 4 3 2 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 his Cora[ Way Beautification master P[an &i_ Design Standards — City of /\A © 2002 Urban Resource Group - Adivis iami ion of Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc. 4— 7 ok, t4 s, ROADWAY (NIC) j MEDIAN j ROADWAY (NIC 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 6 ELEMENTS OF THE DESIGN STANDARDS ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS t URBANISM STANDARDS STREETSCAPE STANDARDS URBAN COMPONENTS 1 BUILDING 2 TRANSITION AREA 3 SIDEWALK 4 LANDSCAPE VERGE 5 BUFFER AREA 6 ROADWAY 7 MEDIAN 03- 884 5 4 3 2 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 his Cora[ Way Beautification master P[an &i_ Design Standards — City of /\A © 2002 Urban Resource Group - Adivis iami ion of Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc. transition Area This area is properly named "transition area" because it is the area where the public realm or streetscape, interacts with and transitions into the private realm. These transitions vary depending on various elements such as sidewalk width and use, abutting use and setback distance. Along the Coral Way corridor, there exists many opportunities to utilize this Zone as an enhancement to both the public and private realms. z G; { 2 Sidewalk The sidewalk includes the space which is intended for pedestrian and/ or recreational through movement. Streetscape elements such as trash receptacles, benches, light poles, seating and landscape should be kept clear of this space. Along Coral Way, the intent for the sidewalk area is to widen this space to a mini- mum of 7 ft to encourage more pedestrian use of the corridor. 7 ft is the minimum width two couples need to pass each other on the sidewalk. SIDEWALK Conditions Before/ after image of Coral Way illustrating the possible uses of the transition area. neroreiarrer image or Coral Way illustrating the increased width of the side- walk along the center Zone Cora[ Way Beautification Master Man & Design Standards -` City of Miami © 2002 Urban Resource Group - A division of Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc. I As illustrated in the images, the transition Zone can range greatly in width and use. The image on the upper left shows how a one foot transition area was treated with simple land- scaping to fill the gap between the sidewalk and the building facade. On the lower left, a restaurant has utilized the tran- sition area by turning it into a seating area. The definition of the space was further enforced by the addition of a colonnade. A small, unobtrusive landscape buffer gives the restaurant user some separation from the sidewalk. If overdone, this can become a detracting condition because it divides the spaces too much, ruining the connec- tivity of the corridor. Part e. c -S j ---)t-, 03- 884 Aunougn It is recommenaea that the sidewalk be kept free of sr obstructions, in some instances such activities such as outdoor i m = seating may be a welcoming feature. The images above il- lustrate how seating along the - sidewalk, if limited to a section of the space can both provided the desired congregation while maintaining some area for Beach, FL through movement. Part e. c -S j ---)t-, 03- 884 Wimp Verle The intended use for this area is to house the many street elements found along the corridor. These elements include trees and understory planting, street furniture such as trash receptacles, benches, and light poles. This area can also serve as an extension of the sidewalk Zone as shown on the right. Here the landscape verge is utilized as not only for landscape, but also as outdoor seating for the restaurant. Notice that in this scenario, the sidewalk is able to be kept clear while the transition Zone and the landscape verge house the restaurant seating. it � 4 LANDSCAPE VERGE uuffer Area The buffer area represents a "buffer" between the streetscape area and the roadway. This space, like the other streetscape elements, is versatile in its use. As illustrated to below, the buffer area can serve as either parallel parking, or in the case of mid -block and street end knuckles, can be an extension of the landscape verge. BUFF Ra r t ID 0)3- 88-4 `4 Before/ After image illustrating the potential of reutilizing the landscape verge as outdoor seat- ing area for this restaurant. Before/ after image illustrating some different uses for the buf- fer area. Here a landscape is- land is situated between parallel parking to soften the design. Las Vegas, NV Neighborhood Street, West Palm Beach, FL The image to the left, illustrates how a landscape verge can be treated in an urban condition. The dec- orative paving not only inproves the aesthetic quality of the horizontal plane, but it also helps define the space as being separate from the sidewalk area. The image above illustrates a condition more com- monly associated with residential areas. The land- scape verge is kept as greenspace to enhance the softer, residential nature of the area. The image to the left shows how an edge Zone can be used to enhance the pedestrian space. Here, at a pedestrian crossing, the edge Zone is used as a "bulb out" which both increases the pedestrian space. and shortens the crossing distance. Corat Way Beautification /Master Man g Design Standards City of Miami © 2002 Urban Resource Group - AdMsion of Kirnley-Horn and Associates, Inc. The Regulating Plan Coral Way is a widely varied and active thoroughfare within close proximity to Downtown Miami. Along Coral Way, are opportunities to live, work, shop and worship. The mix of uses is no accident. The existing zoning categories legally control the land -use, development types and activities on Coral Way. The Coral Way streetscape, Urban, and Architectural Standards are intended to deliver aesthetic standards for future development on Coral Way. These standards are related not to land use, but to degrees of urbanism - the scale of buildings, amount of pedestrian activity and the character of the public realm. Current zoning categories do not typically deal with qualitative issues such as building materials or the proper selection of urban furniture like light fixtures and benches. These standards attempt to work within the current zoning categories and deliver the proper elements of urbanism. The Coral Way Regulating Plan divides the entire area of the thoroughfare into two Zones: The CENTER, and the GENERAL. The CENTER Zone is the area containing the most intense level of activity, determined by the larger buildings, the most opportunity for pedestrian activity and interaction, and the widest range of uses. The CENTER Zone of Coral Way contains many new high-rise buildings with ground floor commercial/ retail space as well as others under construction. The CENTER Zone offers a wide array of uses, and almost every building has a commercial space on the ground floor. Buildings are taller in the CENTER Zone, and with the wide range of uses available, pedestrian interaction is at its peak. The GENERAL Zone is marked by a mix of uses with a slightly more narrow range than the CENTER Zone. Buildings are typically lower, and consist mostly of mid - rise buildings with residential and/ or office space on the upper floors. Some buildings offer ground floor retail or commercial space. In the GENERAL Zone, these uses are typically oriented to the local consumer rather than toward the region. Pedestrian activity is evident but to a lesser degree than in the CENTER Zone. Each subsequent section of these Standards (Urban, Architectural and Streetscape) is arranged according to the Zones illustrated and defined in the Regulating Plan. The use of this Regulating Plan makes it possible to accommodate all the elements of urbanism, from streetscape furnishings to building elements, in a manner that ensures the highest quality urban environment. ntz Cora( Way Beautification /Master Plan a Desi NEWEENNEWENW-Mm� City of Miami © 2002 Urban Resource Group - A division of Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc. Standards Ll1a_IqfI.a Part ft _des qn tax a- ds 03— 884 CENTER BUILDING TYPE I, II, III GENERAI BUILDING TYPE IV, V, VI CENTER TYPE I, II, III CORAL WA (13TH STREET) I �f i� W a D ui D .,44 D Z z Z Uj Z Z W Z yLO > > W ' - Q Q Q Q Q Q G) M Z z N I N (n co (n N (n N (n (n (A CORAL WAY (SW 22ND STREET) II ntz Cora( Way Beautification /Master Plan a Desi NEWEENNEWENW-Mm� City of Miami © 2002 Urban Resource Group - A division of Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc. Standards Ll1a_IqfI.a Part ft _des qn tax a- ds 03— 884 ceiter zeee BUILDINGS 1. Refer to images to the right for suggested building use, building placement, encroachment and on-site parking. TRANSITION AREA 1. Sidewalk material to be either of the following: integral colored concrete mix, standard City of Miami gray concrete, tile or brick pavers. 2. Landscape in this area should not obstruct the pedestrian mobility, nor should it encroach into the sidewalk area. Refer to the plant palette on pages 35 and 36 for suggested plant material. SIDEWALK AREA 1. Refer to page 30 for suggested corner treatments. 2. Refer to pages 37 and 38 for suggested street furniture palette and layout for both corners and mid blocks. 3. All sidewalks should be of a uniform material. Preferred material includes integral colored concrete, City of Miami standard gray concrete, tile or brick pavers. City shall select one option which shall become the approved standard through the corridor. LANDSCAPE VERGE 1. Hardscape material for this area should match or be complementary to the material for the sidewalk area. Either concrete or pavers would be suitable for this verge. 2. Refer to the landscape palette on pages 35 and 36 for the recommended street tree and understory planting. 3. All street tree sizes and forms shall be per current City of Miami code. 4. Tree pit minimum dimensions should have a minimum opening of 30 sf with a minimum edge being 4 ft. Refer to appendix `C' for added volume by use of structural soil. BUFFER AREA 1. ADA spaces per current City of Miami requirements. 2. Refer to appendix `A' for suggested parking configuration. 3. A landscape island measuring a minimum of loft x 8ft should be placed after a run of no more than 10 consecutive on -street parking spaces. 4. Refer to suggested street furniture layout on sheets 37 and 38 for typical placement in this area. M i n i m u m setback distance for street furniture from travel lanes should be 2.5 ft from 0) 3 face 01 Building use Building Type I o Building Type It Building Type III PESDEIIT r I s PESID IIT T I RESIDEn TI 1.,.° I I I RE6 DEll iiAL 'R SIDEiIr.uL BODr DErL ._ RESmA ' BOD" RESIDEHT;m � uoD: s=Taacl-- acD; SFTBAC. - Bou. SETBACi, -- RESIOEJT FL R,ESIOET TIAL VARIES RESIDEII TAL _ '-PIES ` TERRACE----,__ eRCADE -��� COMMERCIAL / CDLDiII'IADE— ��- COMMERCIAL / BALCONY-- COMMERCIAL/ RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL t 11 51 RESIDENTIAL --_ AwNIrJc� I roMHEP..IAL B�°' COMMERCIAL 9ASE BASE L � I REOTAIERCIAL=-- COMEPETAIL C '; COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL j COMMERCIAL _J 10 - FPOIIT SE -a AC/ 7' 6" 10 8' FP.ONT SE TFJ ACh: E IICPDACHIIEI;T 1 8' I ER.OIJT SETBACK EfICP,DACHN.E 1;1 8' VARIES --- �' ---EIICROACHM11f.I.1 BUILD -TO -LINE A' VARIES —� BUILD -TO -LIME 8' VARIES J �--�' BUILD -TO -LIME ulll. /' SIDEYlAL':' 7' VE P.GE-VAPIES UIIJ- 7' SIDEWALK L�-2' VERGE-VAPIES NII'l. 7' SIDEWALK VERGE -VARIES ROW L— Row 1. Building uses shall be as shown above. 2. Conditional uses shall be per City of Miami SD -23 Special Overlay District Ordinance. 3. The building's base height is recommended to be approximately 16 ft at the ground floor for commercial spaces, and approximately 12 ft for mezzanine/ second/ third floor levels. 4. Width of streetscape elements shall be as shown above. Building Placement EAcreacd®ent Pirking uilding Type 1, II, I1I -10' REAR SETBACP' PE:OUIPED DIS TAIICE IAPIES BUILD IIIG HI BASE LUE - EIICROACHMEHT LINE REQUIRED EPONr D' REQUIRED AT SETBACK 10' 51DESTPEET SETBACK �— 12' MAXIMUM SIDE SETBACK Buildings shall be set on lots relative to the property lines as shown here. 2. Building street facades shall extend 90% along the lot frontage. 3. Building rear setback shall be 10 ft or shall be the same as the setback requirement for the adjoining district, whichever is greater. Building Type I, II, III 'I 'J 1 E'ICROACHMEIIT AREA 1,,JJ{1 EIJCROACHMET I" AT FRONTAGE IZ 8' EI:ICRCACHMEIT AT B' SI�ESTREET SETBACK 1. Balconies, awnings and colonnades shall be allowed to encroach in the 8 ft area shown above. 2. Pedestrian -friendly uses such as outdoor seating, landscaping and an extension of the sidewalk are encouraged for this space. Building Type I, II, III 30'-1 SETHACH AT SIDE ETR -ET I i ,,I I PARK:IIIG SPACES SHALL BE PROVIDED NITHA�.I SHADE i APEA I I S-TBACK AT FROTTAGE 1. On-site parking spaces shall be provided within the area shown above. 2. Private parking space dimensions and required numbers shall be per City of Miami standards. 3. Public on -street parking spaces shall be 8 ft x 23 ft per City of Miami standards. Note: For setbacks, refer to City of Miami zoning district requirements for details. Beflnuinns Build -to -line: the line in which a facade of the main building or structure must be placed. Encroachment: A building element that is attached to a building volume and is permitted to exist within a yard, front setback or side street setback. Typical building elements for encroachment include balconies, porches, arcades and other architectural elements that are intended to bring the public realm closer to the building. Side Street Setback: the distance between the side lot line and the elevation of the building, on corner lots only. Building Frontage: the minimum distance that a building must cover in relationship with the width of the lot. Building Lot Coverage: the maximum area of a lot that may be occupied by a structure. Permitted Encroachments: arcades, colonnades, open porches, canopies, awnings, balconies, bay windows and stoops. Encroachment Frontage: is the width of the permitted encroachment in relationship with the overall facade width. Encroachment Setback: the encroachment setback is measured from the build -to -line towards the ROW (right-of-way) or property line. Building Base: The base of the building clearly defines the realm of the Public Space, provided with the necessary spatial enclosure. The base of the building is also the device that effectively engages the pedestrian defining the character and quality of a street or public space. It also houses the uses with the most intensity and varies depending on the overall building height. Building Body: the building body is the majority of the building, mainly defined by its structural composition. It houses the main use and engages all fronts. Body Setback: is a mandatory setback for the full width of the facade, clearly dividing the base from the rest of the building. The distance of the setback varies, but should be noticeable._ in order to perceive the change between the two parts. For more, refer to the Architectural Regulations. Building Top: the building top, could either encompass the last floor of a building and roof, or be the area above the eave or before the parapet line. The building top is determined by the height of the building and is not subject to elements of style. GeneralZone 111101 Use Definitions Buildings 1. Refer to images to the right for suggested building use, building placement, encroachment and on-site parking. I Transition Area 1. Sidewalk material to be either of the following: integral colored concrete mix, standard City of Miami gray concrete, tile or brick pavers. j 2. Landscape in this area should not obstruct the pedestrian mobility, nor should it encroach into the sidewalk area. Refer to the plant palette on pages 35 and 36 for suggested plant material. Sidewalk Area 1. Refer to page 30 for suggested corner t Build -to -line: the line in which a facade of the main building or structure must be placed. Encroachment: A building element that is attached to a building volume and is permitted to exist within a yard, front setback or side street setback. Typical building elements for encroachment include balconies, porches, arcades and other architectural elements that are intended to bring the public realm closer to the building. Side Street Setback: the distance between the side lot line and the elevation of the building, on corner lots only. Building Frontage: the minimum distance that a building must cover in relationship with the width of reatmemS. the lot. 2. Refer to pages 37 and 38 for suggested 1. Building uses shall be as shown above. Building Lot Coverage: the street furniture palette and layout for 2. Conditional uses shall be per City of Miami SD -23 Special Overlay District Ordinance. maximum area of a lot that may be 3. The building's base height is recommended to be approximately 16 ft at the ground floor for commercial spaces, and approximately 12 ft for mezzanine/ second/ third floor levels. occupied by a structure. both corners and mid blocks. 3. All sidewalks should be of a uniform Permitted Encroachments: 4. Width of streetscape elements shall be as shown above. arcades, colonnades, open porches, material. Preferred material includes canopies, awnings, balconies, bay integral colored concrete, City of windows and stoops. Miami standard gray concrete, file or Encroachment Frontage: brick pavers. The City shall select is the width of the permitted one of the options which shall become encroachment in relationship with the approved standard throughout the Building Placement Encroachment Parking the overall facade width.Encroachment Setback: the corridor. Landscape Verge 1. Hardscape material for this area should match or be complementary to the material for the sidewalk area. Either concrete or pavers would be suitable for this verge. 2. Refer to the landscape palette on pages 35 and 36 for the recommended street trees and understory planting. 3. All street tree sizes and forms shall be per current City of Miami code. 4. Tree pit minimum dimensions should have a minimum opening of 30 sf with a minimum edge being 4 ft. Refer to appendix `C' for added volume by use of structural soil. OHUMUClllilcrlt SULUUCK Is measurea from the build -to -line towards the ROW (right-of-way) or property line. Building Base: The base of the building clearly defines the realm of the Public Space, provided with the necessary spatial enclosure. The base of the building is also the device that effectively engages the pedestrian defining the character and quality of a street or public space. It also houses the uses with the most intensity and varies depending on the overall building height. Building Body: the building body is the majority of the building, mainly defined by its structural composition. It houses the main use and engages all fronts. Buffer Area is' .-- __ slDEsrREET sErBacK� 10;;7; 0' ENCRoacHMEr r AT Body Setback: is a mandator y 1. ADA spaces per current City of Miami � "� SIDESTREET SETBACK setback for the full width of the requirements. L 5 s`MINIMUM pig facade, clearly dividing the base 2. Refer to appendix `A' for suggested encK SIDE SETBACK -SETBACK AT FRONTAGE from the rest of the building.The distance of the setback varies, but parking configuration. should be noticeable, in order to 3. A landscape island measuring a 1. Buildings shall be set on lots relative to the property 1. Balconies, awnings and colonnades shall be allowed to 1. On-site parking spaces shall be provided within the perceive the change between the minimum of loft x 8ft should be lines as shown here. encroach in the 10 ft area shown above. area shown above. two parts. For more, refer to the placed after a run of no more than 10 2. Building street facades shall extend 75% along the lot 2. Pedestrian -friendly uses such as outdoor seating, land- 2. Private parking space dimensions and required num- Architectural Regulations. Building Top: the building top, consecutive on -street parking spaces. frontage. soaping and an extension of the sidewalk are encour- bers shall be per City of Miami standards. could either encompass the last floor 4. Refer to suggested street furniture 3. Building rear setback shall be 10 ft or shall be the same aged for this space. 3. Public on -street parking spaces shall be 8 ft x 23 ft per of a building and roof, or be the area layout on pages 37 and 38 for typical as the setback requirement for the adjoining district, City of Miami standards. above the eave or before the parapet placement in this area. Minimum which ever is greater. line. The building top is determined 5o setback distance for street furniture Note: For setbacks, refer to City of Miami zoning district requirements for details. by the height of the building and is from travel lanes should be 2.5 ft from not subject to elements of style. face of curb. "�3— 884 Isar L l l 03— 884 Architectural Stoodards The design and physical definition of the public realm is of vital importance for the urbanism and architectural character of a place. Coral Way's existing contributions to the definition of an authentic urban structure are crucial for the neighborhood and the city. The historical architectural precedents of the city have had an indisputable rich heritage brought from different places, north and south but transformed into a unique South Florida vernacular architecture, that we still see today. Although many Miami neighborhood buildings have been demolished and lost over time, we shall always make references to them because of the importance of their historical and cultural continuity to Existing contributing buildings within Coral Way shall carry forth the legacyofprevious buildings and become seamlessly linked to form a cohesive urban fabric. The importance of the pedestrian should always be primary in the renovation or new construction of any building within Coral Way. Safety is of primary importance to the pedestrian and therefore adequate protection shall be required to accomplish this goal. Close proximity to the sidewalk of buildings with windows on the street can accomplish this perceived sense of security. Accessibility, visibility and openness with sidewalk ramps and clear pathways are essential. In order to respect the pedestrian, the automobile shall be subservient to the enforcement of pedestrian security. This is not to say that the automobile will not to be accommodated, but it should be done, with respect to the urban environment. A unique expression of the architecture of Coral Way can emanate from the building heritage of South Florida. The use of natural ventilation, which was such an important factor in the formation of earlier Miami buildings, can be efficiently reinforced for modern day conveniences and the efficient use of energy. Historically buildings in Miami have had the following characteristics: • Differentiation between public and private buildings. • Masonry with stucco as a dominant building material. • Vertical window and door proportioning systems. • Steady volumetric, without excessive articulation, reinforcing the definition of the public realm. • The expression of a solid base, a body and a top for the design of facades. • Protection from the elements at the sidewalks by means of devices such as awnings, canopies or arcades. • Special corner design conditions as a means of expression to the streets termination. • High percentage of a frontage wall towards the public realm to clearly define areas of public and private use. • Courtyards are prevalent for the private use of the building and to help bring light to interior spaces while providing a visual relief to the streetscape. • The use of balconies to enhance and emphasize special features of the building. City c © 2002 Urban Resource Architectural Standards [Continued) The Architectural Standards for Coral Way are intended to direct new construction and building remodelings towards the highest quality pedestrian experience. The Architectural Standards are not intended to dictate architectural style, nor are they intended to restrict expression or variety in architecture. Rather these guidelines describe those elements that have the greatest impact on the Public Realm in such a way as to ensure that the impact is positive. The Architectural Standards are concerned only with those elements that directly affect the Public Realm, by being directly adjacent to it (as at the lower floors of buildings) or that can be viewed from within it (as roofs or upper story walls). Most of the effort in writing these standards has been spent on the areas commonly referred to as the ground floor or "Base" of buildings. In multi -story or in the case of existing one-story buildings - these are the pieces that most directly affect the public experience. When designing new buildings, particular attention should be displayed towards recognizing the existing architectural language and emphasizing a relationship with that language. This notion should be applied to all facade designs and building masses. The Architectural Standards are organized in two parts, relating directly to the Regulating Plan. There are the GENERAL and CENTER Zones respectively. A building in the GENERAL Zone will be expected to meet the conditions of the GENERAL Zone Architectural Standards, the same for buildings in the CENTER Zone. Within each set of standards are descriptions of the most important elements that make up the building aesthetic. Roofs, openings (windows and doors), walls and other building elements are briefly and simply described. As long as new building designs meet the descriptions contained in the standards, they shall be considered to contribute to the character of the Public Realm. Through the consistent administration of the standards and adherence to them, Coral Way will achieve a comfortable, human -scaled environment. As the standards are concise, it is important to note that the intent of the standards should be held in the highest regard. Variances can be granted (at the discretion of the reviewing body) for architectural merit. Disclaimer: These Architectural Standards are aesthetic in nature. There shall be no conflict with the Florida Building Code, City of Miami Zoning ordinance and other applicable codes and regulations. These Guidelines shall not supersede the South Florida Building Code, City of Miami Zoning ordinance and other applicable building codes and regulations. Reefs A. Shapes of Roofs 1. Roofs shall be flat or sloped. If sloped, it shall be steep enough to be visible from the street. 2. Other roof shapes may be considered for Podium Buildings. B. Flat Roofs 1. Flat roofs shall be required to have a parapet above the roof facing any frontage. The parapet wall shall be a minimum of 12 inches tall (measured above the roof). 2. Any equipment placed on a flat roof is required to be screened by parapet walls or other devices, rendering the equipment invisible from street level. 3. Flat roofs on top of arcades could be used as terraces where outdoor activities could take place. C. Other Roof Elements I. Roofs extending beyond building walls must have a minimum 12 inch overhang, but a 24 inch overhang is preferred. 2. Roof penetrations of a mechanical nature (vents, pipes, ducts, etc.) shall not be visible from the street. FBelles aid Walls A. Openings 1. Openings on the ground floor shall be encouraged and maximized for store fronts. Along the ground floor, windows, doors, and other openings should cover no less than 75% of the facade to allow a visual connection to the interior of the building. 2. Windows and doors may meet at building corners, or shall be a minimum of 24 inches from the building corner. 3. Shading devices over doors and windows are permitted to be cantilevered and made of any architectural grade material, but shall be fully functional rather than simply decorative. 4. All arcade openings (or "voids") shall be vertical in proportion. 5. All window and door openings shall be square or vertical in proportion, and any other divisions of openings shall happen as a system of squares or vertically proportioned rectangles. Grouped or "ganged" windows shall be treated as a single opening, unless they are separated by a minimum 4 inch divider. B. Elevations 1. All elevations of buildings that can be seen from public spaces shall be designed as "fronts." 2. Buildings occupying lots with two frontages (corner lots) shall treat both building walls as "fronts." 3. Buildings identified on the Regulating Plan as terminated vistas shall treat the vista termination with exceptional design attention appropriate to its contribution to the Public Space. 4. Blank walls and blind facades are prohibited. 5. Balconies shall be permitted to assist in projecting the facade. Balconies shall not encroach into the ROW at any time. Balcony design should be in proportion and decorative style with the rest of the facade. 6. Every building shall be designed with a clearly expressed "Base", "Body" and "Top" in terms of materials, colors and details. I"Base" a. The "Base" shall consist of the area of wall from ground level to the second floor level. This is the portion of the building with the strongest relationship to the street environment, and pedestrian activity. The base should be emphasized in terms of materials, color, signage and architectural details. The height of the base should range between 16 to 20 feet. b. The transition from "Base" to "Body" may be expressed either: i. Horizontally, through a shift in the vertical plane toward the interior; or, ii. Vertically, through a change in building materials along a level line. II"Body" a. The "Body" shall consist of the area of wall from the "Base" to the "Top". b. The transition from "Body" to "Top" may be expressed either * Horizontally, through a shift in the vertical plane toward the exterior; or, *Vertically, through a change in building materials along a level line. III"Top" a. The "Top" shall consist of the area of wall from the top floor level to the parapet, or the area of wall from the roof line to the top of the parapet wall. Plain facade with small awnings Material change to divide facade City of Miami Part t T �i gn Standards ©202 Urban Resource GlOUP -A division of Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. - � +J3- 884 C. Wall Materials Commercial buildings should reflect their permanence and context with walls of masonry construction and a special emphasis on stucco veneer. Buildings whose walls are made of stone, brick or EIFS will be referred to as "masonry buildings." Buildings with wall material that is wood or fiber -cement siding will be referred to as "wood buildings." Building walls shall be made of stone, concrete (finished with stucco), brick, or EIFS (detailed like stucco). Stone walls shall be left natural. Brick walls may be painted or left natural. EIFS walls shall be "color -through." Stucco finishes shall be painted. Brick walled building Stucco detailing D. Wall Configurations It is the local tradition to house commercial establishments in simple buildings. The following guidelines are intended to allow for variety, while ensuring a homogeneous streetscape. All of the walls of a single building should be made of a single material (even if the building houses more than one business). Walls may be made of two materials, but the change in material must occur at the first floor line (top of the foundation) or at the second floor line of buildings that have more than two stories, and must occur around the entire building in a horizontal line. Additionally, the visually "heavier " material shall be below the visually "lighter " material (e.g., exposed stone shall go below a stucco finish facade). Where wall materials change, trim is required (e.g.,a decorative brick course, a stone cap, or a decorative stucco treatment). Variety in store fronts 03- 884 Colorful facade with planting E. Trim Materials Around Windows • Trim around windows and doors shall follow the basic construction techniques for the materials used in the building being served. • Window heads and lintels of brick buildings shall be in the form of brick flat arches, brick jack arches, brick soldier courses, precast concrete lintels or cut and dressed stone lintels. • The window sills of brick buildings shall have a stucco finish, or be of exposed brick, precast concrete, or cut and dressed stone. • The window heads and lintels of stucco finish buildings shall be made of precast concrete, have a similar stucco finish, or be of cut and dressed stone. • The window sills of stucco finish buildings shall be made of precast concrete, have a similar stucco finish, or be of cut and dressed stone. F. Trim Materials Around Doors Trim around windows and doors shall be simple and appropriate to the construction techniques of the building. Masonry buildings require masonry arches or lintels at all doorways, and masonry arches or lintels and sills at all openings. On masonry buildings, the lintels shall always be flush with the wall, while the sills shall project from the face of the building a minimum of one-half inch from the wall. EIFS-clad buildings may omit an expressed lintel, but must include an expressed sill at all windows, following the techniques of traditional stucco detailing. G. Storefront Materials and Finishes • Storefront finishes are limited to paint or may be left unpainted if the principal wall material is exposed. • Storefronts should be finished with appropriate materials that reflect the context and permanence of the building. Suggested finishes include stucco, exposed stone, brick, and precast concrete. • Masonry commercial buildings may be finished in stucco and painted subject to approval by the design review committee. Stucco finished storefronts H. Storefront Configuration • Storefront materials should, in addition to relating to the historical examples, be low maintenance and allow unobstructed views into the space inside- to promote window shopping. The use of glass should therefore be encouraged. • Windows and door frames of retail establishments shall be made of wood or ESP (Electrostatic Paint) aluminum. • Doors (excluding service or garage doors) shall be more than 50 % clear glass. • All glass used in storefronts shall be clear (not frosted, textured or otherwise affected) and provide an unobstructed view of a minimum of 6ft into the establishment. • Black glass or "spandrel glass " (glass that is painted black and/ or otherwise made to be opaque) is prohibited. • Art glass may be approved by special permit. City ( © 2002 Urban Resource glass in prohibited Miami ) -A division of Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. H. Storefront Configurations (continued) • Storefronts are the most important element of a commercial building, and should reflect that importance with careful design. Storefronts must be designed as a unified combination of windows and doors, signage, color and awning or canopy. • Windows and doors of retail establishments should occupy no less than 60 % of the total storefront. • When a storefront occupies a corner property, the principal entrance to the building shall be at the corner, or appropriately reflect direct access from the corner. • Garage and service doors shall not be placed near the storefront,and should be placed on the rear elevation. • Windows should be set a minimum of 18 inches above the ground and within 12 inches of the ceiling, reflecting the floor heights of commercial spaces. • Operable transom windows are encouraged above doors and storefront windows. Distinct storefront IM 1 -- I. Storefront Colors Historically, colors of buildings were left to individual discretion and helped create a vibrant streetscape. In this tradition, the following shall apply: • The principal color of commercial establishments shall be selected from a limited palette of pastel colors for storefronts. • One trim or accent color may be used in addition to the principal color and shall be complementary to the principal color. • All storefronts of commercial establishments or residential structures shall be painted with a high -gloss for metal or wood storefronts, with the exception of stone or brick storefronts. • Stone storefronts shall be left unpainted. • Stucco finishes may vary in style. All stucco finished storefronts shall be painted. J. Awning and Canopy Material • Materials of awnings and canopies shall be limited to the traditional materials of those elements. • Awnings of all buildings shall be made of canvas or solution -dyed acrylic fabric. • Internal structure of awnings shall be metal. • Canopies of all buildings shall be made of wood, metal or glass. • Canopy support shall be provided by metal rods, metal wire, cables, or metal brackets. Canvas awning supported by metal internal structure Wood and glass canopy supported by metal hangers K. Awning and Canopy Configuration • Awnings and canopies may be used for commercial storefronts. However, their use must be principally functional — to afford protection from the elements, and their design must reflect their utility- and are not to be used as a substitute for signage. • Awnings and canopies of commercial establishments and residential structures shall be permitted to encroach over the sidewalk at least 6 ft or as the sidewalk permits. • Awnings shall be triangular or curved in section. Awnings may have side panels, but shall not have a panel enclosing the underside of the awning. • Awnings should be within reach from the sidewalk at the vertical flap. • Awnings may have lettering on the vertical flap only. Lettering on the vertical flap should not cover more than 50% of the flap. • Awnings shall not be internally illuminated. • Canopies shall extend horizontally from the building and shall be supported by wires, cables or brackets. • Awnings and canopies shall not be used above the base of a building. illuminated Cora[ Way Beautification Master Man & Design Standards City of Miami © 2002 Urban Resource Group -A division of Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc. L. Arcades • An arcade is a roof or building structure extending over the sidewalk, open to the street and sidewalk except for columns or piers. • Arcades should be a minimum height of 10 ft (excluding signage or lighting) and a minimum clear width of 8 ft inside column face. • The width of the arcade columns should not exceed 36 inches in diameter. In any case, positioning of such columns should attempt to minimize the obstruction of views into the store fronts. • Arcades should not cause roof drainage into the public right-of-way. • Along the building side of the arcade, large windows should be utilized to increase light and safety within the arcade. • Lighting levels in an arcade should be sufficient to permit easy surveillance from the street, while recognizing the need to prevent glare in the stores. • Seating, decorative planting and other elements which stimulate pedestrian interest should be encouraged along colonnades. • Paving materials inside the arcade should, if possible, match the material of the adjacent sidewalk (if the sidewalk has decorative paving materials). If the sidewalk does not have paving materials, then the arcade pavement should be of a decorative material. • Signs on the exterior wall of the arcade should not be permitted. Arcades should be wide enough to allow for continuous pedestrian movement as well as provide for seating and displays. Part ff - Plsi T tand'1 'C M. Paint • The color chosen to paint a particular structure is crucial to the exterior appearance it also affects the character and established relationships to adjacent structures in terms of contrast or combination. The color chosen for structures along the Coral Way Corridor should be connected to and influenced by a coherent color scheme that addresses the larger community's desired character. • All exterior colors should be selected from a pre -approved color chart (suggest utilizing Central Business District Community Appearance Code as a go-by). 511011 1 - Wall Sign - Total area = For signs 15 ft or less above grade, length of facade frontage x I sf. For signs 15 ft to 50 ft above grade, maximum of 50 sf in area for every 100 ft of length of building oriented toward Coral Way. 2 - Projecting Sign - 120 sf (if it protrudes less than 3 ft from wall, and 80 sf (if it protrudes 3 ft to 4 ft from wall) 3 - Awning Sign - Four (4) sf per establishment 4 - Window Sign - Window area x 20% 0111.1 -LLIr% Part 03- 884 N. Signage Configurations • Signage of commercial establishments should be in keeping with the local tradition of simplicity, unassuming lettering and iconography -refer to City of Miami Sign ordinance and SD -23 Coral Way Special Overlay District ordinance. • Signage of commercial establishments should be no larger than 2 ft in height (for horizontal signs)and 2 ft in width (for vertical signs). • Signs shall be illuminated externally, internally or back lit. "Projecting" signs may be attached perpendicular to a building wall, but shall extend no further than 4 ft from the building wall, whether horizontally or vertically oriented. • Lettering may be applied or painted directly onto storefront glass, by special permit. • No building may use more than one type of sign at a time. (max. extension 4 ft) (max. extension 4 ft) O. Signage Lighting Signs may be illuminated in one of the three following ways: • Externally, with fixtures affixed to the building or the sign, and shall wash the sign in color -corrected light; • Internally, within individual characters or icons that shall have a colored, translucent lens; or, • Back -lit, with the light fixtures hidden completely behind individual characters and/ or icons. directly to sign P. Signage Materials and Layout • Signage is to be constructed of local traditional materials. Signs of commercial establishments shall be made of durable materials such as metal, wood, or synthetic material and shall meet local building codes. • Lettering and iconography may be made of wood, synthetic wood, metal or plastic. • Signs may be painted directly on the wall, by special permit. • Signage lighting shall be affixed to the building or to the sign and shall wash the sign in color -corrected light. • All signage lighting shall be shrouded and render the light source invisible from public view whenever possible. • Neon signs should not be allowed. • Refer to City of Miami sign ordinance and SD -23 Coral Way Special Overlay District ordinance for: location of signs on the facade, size of signs, and number of signs per establishment and independently mounted channel letter signs. • Signs should not exceed 50 sf in area for every 100 ft of length of a building wall oriented toward Coral Way. • A Class II Special Permit plus review by the Urban Development Review Board is mandatory for signs 15 ft above grade that exceed the allowable 50 sf of sign area. • Area of signs should not exceed 1.5 sf for each linear foot of building wall frontage on Coral Way. • For signs 15 ft or less above grade, should be limited to lsf of sign area for each linear foot of wall frontage on Coral Way. Synthetic wood sign Q. Shutters • The total width of shutters should not be less than the width of the opening they adjoin. • Shutters should be architecturally designed to enhance the structure. No shutter should be placed on a structure so that it will alter or conceal architectural features or details of a structure. • All shutters, bars, grilles and similar security devices should be installed so as to have their rails, tracks, housing and permanent components concealed or disguised from plain view. • These devices, when possible, should be installed in the interior of a building, and should be concealed completely during business hours. • Track -guided rolling grille curtains, which when open are fully contained within a housing and when closed can be seen through, are encouraged. • Solid, industrial type roll -up shutters shall not be permitted. Cara[ Way Beautification M-asteTP[an & Design Standards City of Miami © 2002 Urban Resource Group - A division of Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Parking A. Screenwall Configuration for Parking • Screenwall configurations are selected for effectiveness in impeding the view into parking lots and are to be built in accordance with local building tradition, to preserve the continuity of the streetscape. • Screenwalls shall be located at all parking lots in view of a public street, and must screen the length of the parking lot from view, except from access drives. • Screenwalls shall be 36 inches in height, measured from the grade on the public side of the wall within the parameters of the local building code and appropriate visibility triangles. • Masonry screenwalls shall be encouraged whenever possible. • Hedges, which shall be planted at a minimum of 36 inches at installation and shall have no spaces between plantings, may be used in addition to screenwalls. • Metal fences, in combination with masonry wall, shall be permitted. • Masonry and metal screen walls, shall be permitted. parking Low wall shielding parking shall be prohibited B. Parallel Parking • These standards recommend on -street parking along the perimeter of the blocks. • Parallel parking, in a busy street such as Coral Way, provides a sense of security for the pedestrian walking by the busy thoroughfare. The parked cars provide a barrier that protects and divides the pedestrians from traffic. Cars next to a sidewalk provide protection to pedestrians. C. Front Yard Setback - Not for Parking • Buildings that are existing with a setback, used primarily for parking, shall be encouraged to make use of this front space for the use of the public with outdoor seating such as a cafe or restaurant. • These areas, fronting the public right of way, shall be treated with compatibility, in materials and designs, with the sidewalk as prescribed in these standards. There shall not be drastic changes in materials that are not compatible with the adjacent right of way street standards. The front yards of existing buildings with a setback shall be dedicated to the public Front loaded parking - backing into the street shall be prohibited D. Parking Structures • No parking should be allowed on the ground floor of buildings fronting Coral Way. • Upper floor elevation design should be integrated into the architecture of the lower floors. • Prefer commercial or residential uses at lower floor facing street with parking situated behind. This building offers public parking on top of ground floor retail and office space. The parking deck facade has been designed to blend into the design for the other half of the building which is a six story office tower. Mechanical and Electrical Equipment • Rooftop or groundfloor mechanical and electrical equipment such as that used in air conditioning fans, water cooling towers, electrical transformers and any other type of mechanical, electrical or service equipment should be screened from view by a parapet, some other type wall or screening that conforms to the rest of the building. Cora[ Way Beautification Master Man a Design Standards City of Miami © 2002 Urban Resource Group - A division of Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc. Parte £ £ _ esicr , andard �a 03— 884 Additional T11111111S... Whether it is private or public, in order for the corridor to succeed as a center for ac- tivity, it must have a strong sense of cohesiveness in its design. These guidelines and standards establish a common language for both private and public sector improve- ments to Coral Way with the intent of a unified building style which is rich in variety and respectful to the heritage and significance of the built and natural environment of Coral Way. Making use of frontages: In the case where buildings have a setback from the property line the opportunity of making better use of the frontage shall be encouraged. Unfortunately, to the demise of the pedestrian, most of these frontages are used for head-on parking. If the space is used for outdoor dining, such as this illustration, the place can become alive with pedestrian activity, Mid block connections: In places where there is an opportunity of a mid -block connection, or rear access to a parking area, a creative treatment of the frontage shall be encouraged. This illustration shows the use of a low wall with metal fence, special paving patterns, and landscape to mark the special character of this place. The street as an open public room: Only by a seamless connectivity of buildings can the walls of the public room of the street be defined. Buildings that call too much attention to themselves do not contribute to a calm and steady street frontage, thereby destroying the sense of place. A cohesive architectural language of masonry, common attachments and fenestration treatments can acomplish these standards as illustrated here with the Santa Barbara, CA standards. Buildings next to open parking spaces: The use of low walls and building attachments, such as stairs and trellises, can provide a continuous frontage where there are no buildings to the rear As in the place of the urban gap, left by an open parking area, is important to be treated in a special way so as to encourage a well defined urban structure for the street. Buildings seamlesly linked; The continuity of a street frontage is achieved by simple well related buildings that are seamlessly connected to their neighbors. Even in the case of an open space, the use of walls, landscaping and paving provides a cohesive environment that makes a place beautiful. Wall configurations for parking frontages: The use of a low wall, trellises, benches and planting, as illustrated in this photograph, is a positive gesture towards the public realm that contributes to a pedestrian friendly environment. Parking shielding: The use of a low wall can be a very effective way of shielding the pedestrian from a parking lot. Additional landscaping, in conjunction with the low wall, can add interest and continuity to the gap in the urban structure. =- 03- 884 Arcades: Arcades are effective only when a pedestrian is able to continue walking under them and through to the other side of the building in his trajectory towards his destination point. No arcades that are truncated shall be permitted. Street terminations: Side streets ending on the main thoroughfare of Coral Way can be terminated by a promintly placed architectural element in the street frontage, to help establish a sense of place. Corner building termination: In order to define the urban structure with buildings, special corner conditions shall be required to help define the end of the block. Volumetric massing of buildings, as the one shown above, illustrate a tower like element reinforcing the corner. Cora[ Way Beautification Maste:TP[ang, Design Standards City of Miami -- - © 2002 Urban Resource Group - A division of Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc. + APPENDIX W - TECHNICAL LAYOUT SHEETS + APPENDIX IB' - STREET PLANTING DIAGRAMS + APPENDIX IC' - TYPICAL URBAN DETAILS + APPENDIX ID' - ANALYSIS BOARDS + APPENDIX 'E' - SIGNAGE AND SPECIAL FEATURES + APPENDIX IF' - COMMUNITY INPUT + APPENDIX IG' - ALTERNATIVE INTERSECTION DESIGNS 93- 884 Q I I z L__ z W U-+ CORAL WAY (SW 22ND ST.) J. T + J -j 0 D+ z W �� � `� w �I 0 �v c� zK-0w 'AL NOTES 7�T ;P CL12B AND GUTTER WAS CONSIDERED ALONG THE MEDIANS FOR THE ROADS AREA, THE SUBSTANTIAL COST DEEMED l� MEDIAN PLANTING PROPOSED CANOPY ,PTION NOT FEASIBLE AS PART OF THIS PROJECT. A POSSIBLE ALTERNATIVE COULD BE A COMBINATION OF CURB AND RIGHT 01 WAY TRIS R ALONG WITH FLUMES PLACED EVERY 15 FT TO 30 FT. THIS ALTERNATIVE WOULD REQUIRE THAT GRADING OF TI -E EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT ALLOWABLE ® PROPOSED FLOWERING VAY BE DONE AS PART OF THE DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS. ® ZONE FOR AWNINGS, ARCADES, WINGS. ARCADES, TREES PROPOSED BUILDING SETBAac COLONNADES, E BALCONIES EXISTING PALMS NFORMATION FOR THIS DOCUMENT IS BASED ON AVAILABLE DATA, WHICH INCLUDES FDOT ROADWAY PLANS, AERIALS, IELD OBSERVATION. FUTURE PLANS WILL REQUIRE AN UPDATED, SIGN AND SEALED TOPOGRAPHICAL/ BOUNDARY PROPOSED VEHICLI AR AREA SETBACK PROPOSED PALMS Y. SIDEWALK ZONE O EXISTING BANYAN TREE . PROPOSED LANDSCAPE 1" = Scale: 50' UPLIGI-rrinlG (ACT LOCATIONS OF DRIVEWAYS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE BASED ON THE UPDATED SURVEY. _ _ _ LANDSCAPE AREA k. PROPOSED ART IN 0. 50' O EXISTING CANOPY TREE PUBLIC PLACES EDGE ZONE (PARALLE_ PARKING/BL180UTS) `y- PROPOSED IRRIGATION ZONE _ EXISTING AND PROPOSED DRIVEWAYS Co-ra[_Way Beautification paster Ran & Design Standards City of Miami © 2002 Urban Resource Group - A division of Kintley-Horn and Associates, Inc. QLQ f Y1111i _�1VOLIC. :1 d; . 03- 884 0 F- J Q la JIM SURVEY. THE EXACT LOCATIONS OF DRIVEWAYS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE BASED ON THE UPDATED SURVEY. A p p d x I.A' 03- 884 Scale: I" = 50' 0' 50' LANDSCAPE AREA O IXISTING CANOPY TREE EDGE ZONE IPARAI 1 E PARKiW-9LL.BOUT9 LPLI04TING rj PROPOSED ART IN PUBLIC PLACES E---- PROPOSED IRRIGATION ZONE IXISTING AND PROPOSED oeiW-NAYS Vj Cora[ Way Beautification Master P[an a Design. Standards City of Miami © 2002 Urban Resource Group - A division of Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc. Qtt11= 2 AI y CORAL WAY (SW 2 D ST.) A+A A A A+A A A+A A+ A A+A A + A A O+A 41 I I z W W W 12 C9 w z PARKING DRIVE AND GARAGE J Q J N W — Q AI y CORAL WAY (SW 2 D ST.) A+A A A A+A A A+A A+ A A+A A + A A O+A 41 Q GENERAL NOTES THOUGH CURB AND GUTTER WAS CONSIDERED ALONG THE MEDIANS FOR THE ROADS AREA. THE SUBSTANTIAL COST DEEMED THIS OPTION NOT FEASIBLE AS PART OF THIS PROJECT. A POSSIBLE ALTERNATIVE COULD BE A COMBINATION OF CURB AND GUTTER ALONG WITH FLUMES PLACED EVERY 15 FT TO 30 FT. THIS ALTERNATIVE WOULD REQUIRE THAT GRADING OF THE U W ROADWAY BE DONE AS PART OF THE DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS. QBASE INFORMATION FOR THIS DOCUMENT IS BASED ON AVAILABLE DATA, WHICH INCLUDES FDOT ROADWAY PLANS, AERIALS, AND FIELD OBSERVATION. FUTURE PLANS WILL REQUIRE AN UPDATED, SIGNED AND SEALED TOPOGRAPHICAL/ BOUNDARY Cn SURVEY. THE EXACT LOCATIONS OF DRIVEWAYS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE BASED ON THE UPDATED SURVEY. NLE LE I RIGHT OF WAY MEDIAN PLANTING (DO PROPOSED CANOPY 0 rtJ TREES [� EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT ALLOWABLE ENCROACHMENT PROPOSED FLOWERING PROPOSED BUILDING SETBACK ® ZONE FOR AWNINGS, ARCADES, TREES � j E -I COLONNADES. E BALCONIES v EXISTING PALMS �/ W PROPOSED VEHICULAR AREA SETBACK W }�' PROPOSED PALMS I SIDEWALK ZONEt EXISTING BANYAN TREE PROPOSED LANDSCAPE Scale: 1" = 50' UPLIGPTING LANDSCAPE AREA • PROPOSED ART IN EXISTING CANOPY TREE PUBLIC PLACES O 50� EDGE ZONE (PARALLEL PARKING/SLLBOLITS) F —� -- PROPOSED IRRIGATION ZONE EXISTING AND PROPOSED DRIVEWAYS wJJWCC oral Way BtuaffluuTim Matter Plan & Dtbi C ]Ly Cf M1dII1 © 2002 Urban Resource Group - A division of Kimley-Hom and Associates, [tic. Swidaidb Technical Layout Appendix `N 03-, 884 W w z PARKING DRIVE AND GARAGE Q N W — Q — Z O W 0 W Q z W o � W Q l c O Q HIGH—RISE APPARTMENTS WD > m W O Q m (CORAL PLAZA CONDOS) > O CV W (� w z — CC O LL Q GENERAL NOTES THOUGH CURB AND GUTTER WAS CONSIDERED ALONG THE MEDIANS FOR THE ROADS AREA. THE SUBSTANTIAL COST DEEMED THIS OPTION NOT FEASIBLE AS PART OF THIS PROJECT. A POSSIBLE ALTERNATIVE COULD BE A COMBINATION OF CURB AND GUTTER ALONG WITH FLUMES PLACED EVERY 15 FT TO 30 FT. THIS ALTERNATIVE WOULD REQUIRE THAT GRADING OF THE U W ROADWAY BE DONE AS PART OF THE DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS. QBASE INFORMATION FOR THIS DOCUMENT IS BASED ON AVAILABLE DATA, WHICH INCLUDES FDOT ROADWAY PLANS, AERIALS, AND FIELD OBSERVATION. FUTURE PLANS WILL REQUIRE AN UPDATED, SIGNED AND SEALED TOPOGRAPHICAL/ BOUNDARY Cn SURVEY. THE EXACT LOCATIONS OF DRIVEWAYS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE BASED ON THE UPDATED SURVEY. NLE LE I RIGHT OF WAY MEDIAN PLANTING (DO PROPOSED CANOPY 0 rtJ TREES [� EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT ALLOWABLE ENCROACHMENT PROPOSED FLOWERING PROPOSED BUILDING SETBACK ® ZONE FOR AWNINGS, ARCADES, TREES � j E -I COLONNADES. E BALCONIES v EXISTING PALMS �/ W PROPOSED VEHICULAR AREA SETBACK W }�' PROPOSED PALMS I SIDEWALK ZONEt EXISTING BANYAN TREE PROPOSED LANDSCAPE Scale: 1" = 50' UPLIGPTING LANDSCAPE AREA • PROPOSED ART IN EXISTING CANOPY TREE PUBLIC PLACES O 50� EDGE ZONE (PARALLEL PARKING/SLLBOLITS) F —� -- PROPOSED IRRIGATION ZONE EXISTING AND PROPOSED DRIVEWAYS wJJWCC oral Way BtuaffluuTim Matter Plan & Dtbi C ]Ly Cf M1dII1 © 2002 Urban Resource Group - A division of Kimley-Hom and Associates, [tic. Swidaidb Technical Layout Appendix `N 03-, 884 12 W Q �jm +A) A (,A + A )A� A+A A� A+ A )A +A P P P P • P P P P TWO)// i W O X CD o z z Q � I-- ------ --------- CORAL Y D ST.) A+A A+A A+ A A+A A A+A � 4 ON A + A_L�? +A E771 Al STechnical Laveut Appendix 'A' 03- 884 Coral NkyB a adt"n M aNter Planufic D uAgn SLai jdajdn CkyCfMiwxj © 2002 Urban RCSDUTCO CiC011p - Adivision of Kimlcy-Horn and Associates, Inc. PA�'KING LOT PARKING LOT Z z PARKING LOT — — — — — — — — — oc Q z O Q O Q O O W -J ZW_ QI O CY O o 0 > 0O O z MCDONALDS cn 0I o (j)Q O Lu Lu Lu W U d Z co W O Q W co cn Cf) U oc d co 0 GENERAL NOTES THOUGH CURB AND GUTTER WAS CONSIDERED ALONG THE MEDIANS FOR THE ROADS AREA, THE SUBSTANTIAL COST DEEMED IBJ LEGBJJ 11 RIGHT OF WAY MEDIAN PLANTING (D' -J PROPOSED CANOPY O TREES (� N THIS OPTION NOT FEASIBLE AS PART OF THIS PROJECT. A POSSIBLE ALTERNATIVE COULD BE A COMBINATION OF CURB AND EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT ALLOWABLE ENCROACHMENT pp T PROPOSED FLOWERING TREES I� GUTTER ALONG WITH FLUMES PLACED EVERY 15 FT TO 30 FT. THIS ALTERNATIVE WOULD REQUIRE THAT GRADING OF THE f / PROPOSED BUILDING SETBACK / / / ZONE FOR AWNINGS, ARCADES, COLONNADES. E BALCONIES EXISTING PALMS W ROADWAY BE DONE AS PART OF THE DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS. { u W Q BASE INFORMATION FOR THIS DOCUMENT IS BASED ON AVAILABLE DATA, WHICH INCLUDES FDOT ROADWAY PLANS, AERIALS, AN UPDATED, SIGNED AND SEALED TOPOGRAPHICAL/ BOUNDARY AND FIELD OBSERVATION. FUTURE PLANS WILL REQUIRESIDEWALK PROPOSED VE341CL AR AREA SETBACK ZONE ) t EXISTING BANYAN rRFJ y PROPOSED PALMS PROPOSED LANDSCAPE SURVEY, _ Scale: 1" = 50' 9 LPLIGHTING PROPOSED ART IN THE EXACT LOCATIONS OF DRIVEWAYS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE BASED ON THE UPDATED SURVEY. LANDSCAPE AREA O EXISTING CANOPY TREE F— a PUBLIC PLACES PROPOSED IRRIGATION ZONE 01 50' EDGE ZONE (PARALLEL PARKING/BU.BOUTS) _ - EXISTING AND PROPOSED DRIVEWAYS STechnical Laveut Appendix 'A' 03- 884 Coral NkyB a adt"n M aNter Planufic D uAgn SLai jdajdn CkyCfMiwxj © 2002 Urban RCSDUTCO CiC011p - Adivision of Kimlcy-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2 W Z J0 in - 0 0 CORAL WAY (SW 22ND ST �emv�'Kvzzz;� 11x'0 1'.Sm POTENTIA \W TING AREA I1 � a1 ! J It • !i 1 J ! 1 N C� TREES CORAL WAY (SW 22ND ST �emv�'Kvzzz;� 11x'0 1'.Sm POTENTIA \W TING AREA Z ALLOWABLE ENCROACHMENT 0-) V/ C PROPOSED FLOWERING z W N C� TREES CORAL WAY (SW 22ND ST �emv�'Kvzzz;� 11x'0 1'.Sm QGENERAL NOTES l�T E—I THOUGH CURB AND GUTTER WAS CONSIDERED ALONG THE MEDIANS FOR THE ROADS AREA, THE SUBSTANTIAL COST DEEMED 1V x � THIS OPTION NOT FEASIBLE AS PART OF THIS PROJECT. A POSSIBLE ALTERNATIVE COULD BE A COMBINATION OF CURB AND GUTTER ALONG WITH FLUMES PLACED EVERY 15 FT TO 30 FT. THIS ALTERNATIVE WOULD REQUIRE THAT GRADING OF THE W ROADWAY BE DONE AS PART OF THE DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS. Q W BASE INFORMATION FOR THIS DOCUMENT IS BASED ON AVAILABLE DATA, WHICH INCLUDES FDOT ROADWAY PLANS, AERIALS, AND FELD OBSERVATION. FUTURE PLANS WILL REQUIRE AN UPDATED, SIGNED AND SEALED TOPOGRAPHICAL/ BOUNDARY SU2VEY. Scale: 1" = 50' THE EXACT LOCATIONS OF DRIVEWAYS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE BASED ON THE UPDATED SURVEY. 0' 50' Twz Cora[ Way BWLIfficarim MabzerPlan & Dttij C it_y c f /\A] ill I © 2002 Urban Resource Group - Adivision of Kimlcy-Horn and Associates, Inc. Cl I i POTENTIA OUTDOORS TING AREA Z ALLOWABLE ENCROACHMENT - PROPOSED FLOWERING W L__ TREES Q In Uj LO EXISTING PALMS p[ O Q J cq PROPOSED PALMS Q U (n W UJ Z PROPOSED LANDSCAPE cn oc Q I~ � o 0 (PLIGHTING LANDSCAPE AREA LL PROPOSED ART IN W Qa mm PUBLIC PLACES EDGE ZONE (PARALLEL PARKING/B I OLITS) /\ V PROPOSED IRRIGATION ZONE z z Q Q DRIVEWAYS U U Q Q ., > > QGENERAL NOTES l�T E—I THOUGH CURB AND GUTTER WAS CONSIDERED ALONG THE MEDIANS FOR THE ROADS AREA, THE SUBSTANTIAL COST DEEMED 1V x � THIS OPTION NOT FEASIBLE AS PART OF THIS PROJECT. A POSSIBLE ALTERNATIVE COULD BE A COMBINATION OF CURB AND GUTTER ALONG WITH FLUMES PLACED EVERY 15 FT TO 30 FT. THIS ALTERNATIVE WOULD REQUIRE THAT GRADING OF THE W ROADWAY BE DONE AS PART OF THE DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS. Q W BASE INFORMATION FOR THIS DOCUMENT IS BASED ON AVAILABLE DATA, WHICH INCLUDES FDOT ROADWAY PLANS, AERIALS, AND FELD OBSERVATION. FUTURE PLANS WILL REQUIRE AN UPDATED, SIGNED AND SEALED TOPOGRAPHICAL/ BOUNDARY SU2VEY. Scale: 1" = 50' THE EXACT LOCATIONS OF DRIVEWAYS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE BASED ON THE UPDATED SURVEY. 0' 50' Twz Cora[ Way BWLIfficarim MabzerPlan & Dttij C it_y c f /\A] ill I © 2002 Urban Resource Group - Adivision of Kimlcy-Horn and Associates, Inc. Cl I i MEDIAN PLANTING a(� PROPOSED CANOPY TREES Z ALLOWABLE ENCROACHMENT PROPOSED FLOWERING ZONE F012 L__ TREES 5 A +A � A) A+A LEGEND, r I I RIGHT OF WAY MEDIAN PLANTING a(� PROPOSED CANOPY TREES Z ALLOWABLE ENCROACHMENT PROPOSED FLOWERING ZONE F012 TREES PROPOSED BUILDING SETBACK Z Uj LO EXISTING PALMS LL Q Q Q J cq PROPOSED PALMS W W Z Q (n W UJ Z PROPOSED LANDSCAPE cn oc > � o 0 (PLIGHTING LANDSCAPE AREA LL PROPOSED ART IN Qa mm PUBLIC PLACES EDGE ZONE (PARALLEL PARKING/B I OLITS) LEGEND, r I I RIGHT OF WAY MEDIAN PLANTING a(� PROPOSED CANOPY TREES EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT ALLOWABLE ENCROACHMENT PROPOSED FLOWERING ZONE F012 TREES PROPOSED BUILDING SETBACK COLONNADES EI BALCONIES tit EXISTING PALMS PROPOSED VE41CU-AR AREA SETBACK y� PROPOSED PALMS SIDEWALK ZONEt EXISTING BANYAN TREE PROPOSED LANDSCAPE (PLIGHTING LANDSCAPE AREA a PROPOSED ART IN EXISTING CANOPY TRS�� PUBLIC PLACES EDGE ZONE (PARALLEL PARKING/B I OLITS) /\ V PROPOSED IRRIGATION ZONE - EXISTING AND PROPOSED DRIVEWAYS Sraidaidb kn 1z H W x 03- 884 Q z z W z° Q z W I Q I �m v W I I< W J 1 z O m �� L20 — — — — C P 1 P ,Y P A + A P I P I P 1 P 1- P _ OP L WAY CSW 22 D ST.) (A+ - r-A+A A A A�-A - - - - - - A + A+A) A A) +A r A A A Y/////////A 1 P I P I P I P I P I P �A+ A -(A + c Z �— D LU— — z >- —Q U U 51 —z W O to 1 RIGHT OF WAY MEDIAN PLANTING J O U IQ EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT a z PROPOSED FLOWERING TREES o GUTTER ROADWAY BE DONE AS PART OF THE DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS. PROPOSED BUILDING SETBACK °� PALMS E U U O FL z O IU I � W W l BASE INFORMATION FOR THIS DOCUMENT IS BASED ON AVAILABLE DATA, WHICH INCLUDES FDOT ROADWAY PLANS, AERIALS, AND FIELD OBSERVATION. FUTURE PLANS WILL REQUIRE AN UPDATED, SIGNED AND SEALED TOPOGRAPHICAL/ BOUNDARYEXISTING SURVEY. Q BAN YAN TREE Q U (n Q n- m Lu Q m p U >- Q � Q Q p[ -1 — _ OP L WAY CSW 22 D ST.) (A+ - r-A+A A A A�-A - - - - - - A + A+A) A A) +A r A A A Y/////////A 1 P I P I P I P I P I P �A+ A -(A + 93- 884 Coral y Bwafficar-kn M abler Plan & D ign Swi jdaIdb C 141y dMidid © 2002 Urban Resource Group - A division of Kimicy-Horn and Associates, Inc. O LL �— D LU— — z >- —Q W Q 51 —z W O GENERAL NOTES THOUGH CURB AND GUTTER WAS CONSIDERED ALONG THE MEDIANS FOR THE ROADS AREA, THE SUBSTANTIAL COST DEEMED �7 lv 1 RIGHT OF WAY MEDIAN PLANTING J O THIS OPTION NOT FEASIBLE AS PART OF THIS PROJECT. A POSSIBLE ALTERNATIVE COULD BE A COMBINATION OF CURB AND ALONG WITH FLUMES PLACED EVERY 15 FT TO 30 FT. THIS ALTERNATIVE WOULD REQUIRE THAT GRADING OF THE EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT a z PROPOSED FLOWERING TREES U GUTTER ROADWAY BE DONE AS PART OF THE DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS. PROPOSED BUILDING SETBACK °� PALMS E U U O O O IU I � W W l BASE INFORMATION FOR THIS DOCUMENT IS BASED ON AVAILABLE DATA, WHICH INCLUDES FDOT ROADWAY PLANS, AERIALS, AND FIELD OBSERVATION. FUTURE PLANS WILL REQUIRE AN UPDATED, SIGNED AND SEALED TOPOGRAPHICAL/ BOUNDARYEXISTING SURVEY. PROPOSED VEHICULAR AREA SETBACK — -- — O+ _ _ I SIDEWALK ZONE BAN YAN TREE Q U (n Q n- W �- Lu Q m p U >- Q � Q Q p[ _ - EXISTING AND PROPOSED zz Q(DCf) LU QQ 'z a: iQ< J U o J 2 � z DC6J W W O I O J � Q O I> z U 93- 884 Coral y Bwafficar-kn M abler Plan & D ign Swi jdaIdb C 141y dMidid © 2002 Urban Resource Group - A division of Kimicy-Horn and Associates, Inc. O LL D 51 O GENERAL NOTES THOUGH CURB AND GUTTER WAS CONSIDERED ALONG THE MEDIANS FOR THE ROADS AREA, THE SUBSTANTIAL COST DEEMED �7 lv 1 RIGHT OF WAY MEDIAN PLANTING PROPOSED CANOPY PREPS O THIS OPTION NOT FEASIBLE AS PART OF THIS PROJECT. A POSSIBLE ALTERNATIVE COULD BE A COMBINATION OF CURB AND ALONG WITH FLUMES PLACED EVERY 15 FT TO 30 FT. THIS ALTERNATIVE WOULD REQUIRE THAT GRADING OF THE EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT ALLOWABLE EN CROACHMENT PROPOSED FLOWERING TREES U GUTTER ROADWAY BE DONE AS PART OF THE DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS. PROPOSED BUILDING SETBACK ZONE FOR AWNINGS, ARCADES, PALMS E U U W COLONNADES. E BALCONIES � EXISTING � W W W x Vi BASE INFORMATION FOR THIS DOCUMENT IS BASED ON AVAILABLE DATA, WHICH INCLUDES FDOT ROADWAY PLANS, AERIALS, AND FIELD OBSERVATION. FUTURE PLANS WILL REQUIRE AN UPDATED, SIGNED AND SEALED TOPOGRAPHICAL/ BOUNDARYEXISTING SURVEY. PROPOSED VEHICULAR AREA SETBACK — -- — O+ _ _ I SIDEWALK ZONE BAN YAN TREE PROPOSED PALMS GOSED LANDSCAPE Q = THE EXACT LOCATIONS OF DRIVEWAYS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE BASED ON THE UPDATED SURVEY. Scale: 1" 50' LANDSCAPE AREA EXISTING CANOPY TRS O HTIW- PROPOSED ART IN PUBLIC PLACES O' 50' KING/BBOUfS)l, EDGE ZONE (PARALLEL PARLL PROPOSED IRRIGATION ZONE _ - EXISTING AND PROPOSED DRIVEWAYS 93- 884 Coral y Bwafficar-kn M abler Plan & D ign Swi jdaIdb C 141y dMidid © 2002 Urban Resource Group - A division of Kimicy-Horn and Associates, Inc. K� THE EXACT LOCATIONS OF DRIVEWAYS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE BASED ON THE UPDATED SURVEY. Cora[ Way B City of Miami © 2002 Urban Resource Group - A division of Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc. Scale: 1" = 50' 0' 50' LANDSCAPE AREA EDGE ZONE (PARAUB PA12KING/BU90UTS) eauti f ication Master Man a Design Standards EXISTING CANOPY TREE LPLiGHTiNG PROPOSED ART IN PUBLIC PLACES k„ PROPOSED IRRIGATION ZONE EXISTING AND PROPOSED DRIVEWAYS 74 CA 03- 884 w z z Uj 0 z w W >- LU ly w z < CY 0 0 z D z —7 0 0- 0 ly 0 z —j N 0 0 > -i LLI LL z >- i 0z LU LL V AN,, (D (D (D z 4, z Lij w m N L0 ly LU 0 LLJ V -j �y (D Z Uj N LLJ z 01 AR--� V CY > > -1 < (D 7 < 0 0 U 0 -----J��- — — _ - COPAL WAY (SW 22ND ST.) 7T— T. —fTW/9 I ol > Cf) V- o- f OF zo z Uj LU < CY < D LL 0 + LU <0 q LU < 0 of �-> z W 0a 0 Q (Y 0 CID " 00 GENERAL NOTES LEGEND 0 N MEDIAN PLA111TING0 PROPOSED CANOPY THOUGH CURB AND CUTTER WAS CONSIDERED ALONG THE MEDIANS FOR THE ROADS AREA, THE SUBSTANTIAL COST DEEMED RIGHT OF WAY TREES Nip THIS OPTION NOT FEASIBLE AS PART OF THIS PROJECT. A POSSIBLE ALTERNATIVE COULD BE A COMBINATION OF CURB AND ED EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT ALLOWABLE ENCQOACI-� 10 PROPOSFLOWERING GUTTER ALONG WITH FLUMES PLACED EVERY 15 FT TO 30 FT. THIS ALTERNATIVE WOULD REQUIRE THAT GRADING OF THE TREES U ROADWAY BE DONE AS PART OF THE DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS, ZONE F012 AWNINGS, ARCADES. PROPOSED BUILDING SETBACK COLONNADES. E BALCONIES 0 EXISTING PALMS BASE INFORMATION FOR THIS DOCUMENT IS BASED ON AVAILABLE DATA, WHICH INCLUDES FDOT ROADWAY PLANS, AERIALS, PROPOSED VEHICLLA12 AREA SETBACKPROPOSED PALMS AND FIELD OBSERVATION. FUTURE PLANS WILL REQUIRE AN UPDATED, SIGNED AND SEALED TOPOGRAPHICAL/ BOUNDARY EXISTING BANYAN TREE SIDEWALK ZONE PROPOSED LANDSCAPE SURVEY. Scale: 1" 50' . -- 0 LIPLIGWTING THE EXACT LOCATIONS OF DRIVEWAYS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE BASED ON THE UPDATED SURVEY. LANDSCAPE AREA PROPOSED ART IN 01 01 �Nll EXISTING CANOPY TREE PLIBLIC PLACES 5 EDGE ZONE (PARALLEL PAPKING/BLI-OUTS) (D PROPOSED IRRIGATION ZONE EXISTING AND PROPOSED DRIVEWAYS Coral Wav Beautification Master Man & 93- 884 Design Standards City of Miami 2002 Urban Resource Group - A division ofKimley-Hom and Associates, Inc G ~ O z U W C IW > Q W U I O Q D Q z U) m z j PARKING LOT � 0 z m U v QO co O Im O O Z I Q droll d Q >- IO p N Q — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — > �— — — V� O `-j > � = - O Y - W U W Q D Q zQ� U z z oz PARKING LOT � 0 U) m U QUO U w 'qQm droll V� `-j > � Q (y O p zQ� U W z Lo PARKING LOT —� m — — OO>z Q GENERAL NOTES: THOUGH CURB AND GUTTER WAS CONSIDERED ALONG THE MEDIANS FOR THE ROADS AREA, THE SUBSTANTIAL COST DEEMED �lz THIS OPTION NOT FEASIBLE AS PART OF THIS PROJECT. A POSSIBLE ALTERNATIVE COULD BE A COMBINATION OF CURB AND rTi GUTTER ALONG WITH FLUMES PLACED EVERY 15 FT TO 30 FT. THIS ALTERNATIVE WOULD REQUIRE THAT GRADING OF THE U W ROADWAY BE DONE AS PART OF THE DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS, W BASE INFORMATION FOR THIS DOCUMENT IS BASED ON AVAILABLE DATA, WHICH INCLUDES FDOT ROADWAY PLANS. AERIALS, xi AND FIELD OBSERVATION. FUTURE PLANS WILL REQUIRE AN UPDATED, SIGNED AND SEALED TOPOGRAPHICAL/ BOUNDARY SURVEY. THE EXACT LOCATIONS OF DRIVEWAYS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE BASED ON THE UPDATED SURVEY N m i l m RIGHT OF WAY MEDIAN FLAMING Qi\� PROPOSED CANOPY O TREES pp 0%, EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT AVOWABLE ENCROACi-IMENT PROPOSED ROWERING!trTr! 14� L_L_L_L1J ZONE FOR AWNINGS, ARCADES, TREES � � f— PROPOSED BUILDING SETBACK COLONNADES. E BALCONIES "syf' EXISTING PALMS �d (J� PROPOSED VEHICULAR AREA SETBACK } PROPOSED PALMS Q W SIDEWALK ZONE t EXISTING BANYAN TREE PROPOSED LANDSCAPE Scale: 1" = 50' U LANDSCAPE AREA 0 PROPOSED ART IN EXISTING CANOPY TREEPUBLIC PLACES 0l 50' EDGE ZONE (PARALLEL PARKING/BU.BOUTS) 0 k--...tt ---a PROPOSED IRRIGATION ZONE _ - EXISTING AND PROPOSED DRVEWAYS Coral Way BtULdfitaim Matter F7311an & D tbipp star daidb C jLy C f Midi I I @2002 Urban RCSOUTce Group- A division of Kimlcy-Horn and Associates, Inc. 03- 884 Q z (y O p zQ� U U z Q�QW �0 —� m — — N m i l m RIGHT OF WAY MEDIAN FLAMING Qi\� PROPOSED CANOPY O TREES pp 0%, EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT AVOWABLE ENCROACi-IMENT PROPOSED ROWERING!trTr! 14� L_L_L_L1J ZONE FOR AWNINGS, ARCADES, TREES � � f— PROPOSED BUILDING SETBACK COLONNADES. E BALCONIES "syf' EXISTING PALMS �d (J� PROPOSED VEHICULAR AREA SETBACK } PROPOSED PALMS Q W SIDEWALK ZONE t EXISTING BANYAN TREE PROPOSED LANDSCAPE Scale: 1" = 50' U LANDSCAPE AREA 0 PROPOSED ART IN EXISTING CANOPY TREEPUBLIC PLACES 0l 50' EDGE ZONE (PARALLEL PARKING/BU.BOUTS) 0 k--...tt ---a PROPOSED IRRIGATION ZONE _ - EXISTING AND PROPOSED DRVEWAYS Coral Way BtULdfitaim Matter F7311an & D tbipp star daidb C jLy C f Midi I I @2002 Urban RCSOUTce Group- A division of Kimlcy-Horn and Associates, Inc. 03- 884 z zQ� U U z Q�QW �0 z Oa N OO>z QUO U w 'qQm droll N m i l m RIGHT OF WAY MEDIAN FLAMING Qi\� PROPOSED CANOPY O TREES pp 0%, EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT AVOWABLE ENCROACi-IMENT PROPOSED ROWERING!trTr! 14� L_L_L_L1J ZONE FOR AWNINGS, ARCADES, TREES � � f— PROPOSED BUILDING SETBACK COLONNADES. E BALCONIES "syf' EXISTING PALMS �d (J� PROPOSED VEHICULAR AREA SETBACK } PROPOSED PALMS Q W SIDEWALK ZONE t EXISTING BANYAN TREE PROPOSED LANDSCAPE Scale: 1" = 50' U LANDSCAPE AREA 0 PROPOSED ART IN EXISTING CANOPY TREEPUBLIC PLACES 0l 50' EDGE ZONE (PARALLEL PARKING/BU.BOUTS) 0 k--...tt ---a PROPOSED IRRIGATION ZONE _ - EXISTING AND PROPOSED DRVEWAYS Coral Way BtULdfitaim Matter F7311an & D tbipp star daidb C jLy C f Midi I I @2002 Urban RCSOUTce Group- A division of Kimlcy-Horn and Associates, Inc. 03- 884 { •+A ] - (A+A) A A A . . W C� — W 0 0o J Q W Q z d W U �Lli z W W Q d Q Q (n z J z z Y � z UQ O 00 �-_j OQ Q - W cnQ N� z N j O U � X W J _ LL — d — { •+A ] - (A+A) A A A . . W C� — W 0 0o Q Q W J z d W O �Lli z 0 W Q ry J QO Q Q om z (D z_ U— 9 — — — — --I Q U ~ CD 0 - d J LL O I LU z >- C9 z z O 0Oo I UQ 00 �-_j OQ - W cnQ N� Nm N j J r O GENERAL NOTES: 00 THOUGH CURB AND GUTTER WAS CONSIDERED ALONG THE MEDIANS FOR THE ROADS AREA, THE SUBSTANTIAL COST DEEMED THIS OPTION NOT FEASIBLE AS PART OF THIS PROJECT. A POSSIBLE ALTERNATIVE COULD BE A COMBINATION OF CURB AND x GUTTER ALONG WITH FLUMES PLACED EVERY 15 FT TO 30 FT. THIS ALTERNATIVE WOULD REQUIRE THAT GRADING OF THE U W ROADWAY BE DONE AS PART OF THE DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS. rWr+ BASE INFORMATION FOR THIS DOCUMENT IS BASED ON AVAILABLE DATA, WHICH INCLUDES FOOT ROADWAY PLANS, AERIALS, .T. AND FIELD OBSERVATION. FUTURE PLANS WILL REOUIRE AN UPDATED, SIGNED ANO SEALED TOPOGRAPHICAL/ BOUNDARY V] SURVEY. THE EXACT LOCATIONS OF DRIVEWAYS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE BASED ON THE UPDATED SURVEY Coral 03- 884 �y tuaitic ar. n M abt r Plan D ttiim Swi daidb C ky Cf M idi I i © 2002 Urban RCs011TCe Group - A division of Kimlcy-Horn and Associates, Inc. 9 Ly d O (D z J UQ z W Oz W pC J X W J LU co O z O DQ Q O Q oC z W d O O d Q = z 0 z W O o O Q m W Q Q Q Q o CIDC9 (n m Ily Q J O z D Q z QJ Q C3 W Q 9) O~ °C Q Q a z W � � z Lu W U O Q W— Q Q m m Q—L cn U) CO L WAY (SW 22N J rA M Q Cf) Cf) Q m Q U - d Qd < Q W U- Q pc O > O oc Q t d Q (n Q Ud �J LEGENA, RIGHT of war ING MEDIAN PLANTING �} Q J PROPOSED CANOPY TREES O EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT ALLOWABLE ENCROACHMENT io PROPOSED FLOWERING TREES F PROPOSED BUILDING SETBACK L-LLJ ZONE FOR AWNINGS, ARCADES. COLONNADES, E BALCONIES's. EXISTING PALMS (1 W W - — PROPOSED VEbIICL.LAR AREA SETBACK SIDEWALK ZONE O EXISTING BANYAN TREE PROPOSED PALMS PROPOSED LANDSCAPE V] Scale: 1" = 50' LANDSCAPE AREA • IP-IGHTING PROPOSED ART IN PUBLIC PLACES 01 50' EDGE ZONE (PARALLEL PARKINIG/BLLBOLITS) O EXISTING CANOPY TREE t— d�--. PROPOSED IRRIGATION ZONE - EXISTING AND PROPOSED DRIVEWAYS �y tuaitic ar. n M abt r Plan D ttiim Swi daidb C ky Cf M idi I i © 2002 Urban RCs011TCe Group - A division of Kimlcy-Horn and Associates, Inc. THOUGH CURB AND GUTTER WAS CONSIDERED ALONG TI -E MEDIANS FOR TWE ROADS AREA, THE SUBSTANTIAL COST DEEMED THIS OPTION NOT FEASIBLE AS PART OF THIS PROJECT. A POSSIBLE ALTERNATIVE COULD BE A COMBINATION OF CURB AND GUTTER ALONG WITH FLUMES PLACED EVERY 15 FT TO 30 FT. THIS ALTERNATIVE WOULD REOUIRE THAT GRADING OF THE U W ROADWAY BE DONE AS PART OF THE DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS. BASE INFORMATION FOR THIS DOCUMENT IS BASED ON AVAILABLE DATA, WHICH INCLUDES FOOT ROADWAY PLANS, AERIALS, AND FIELD OBSERVATION, FUTURE PLANS WILL REQUIRE AN UPDATED, SIGNED AND SEALED TOPOG12AP14ICAU BOUNDARY SLRVEY. TLE EXACT LOCATIONS OF DRIVEWAYS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE BASED ON TLE UPDATED SURVEY MAN PLANTING Ofp,PROPOSEDCANOPY QTREES RIGHT OF WAY rl EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT 9 'p PROPOSE FLOWERING PROPOS® BUILDING SETBACK ® ZONE POR AWNINGS, ARCADES. COLONNADES. E BALCONIES ( TRIS EXISTING PALMS U PROPOSED VE3NICU-AR AREA SETBACK PROPOSED PALMS W IWI SIDEWALK ZONE O EXISTING BANYAN TRIM PROPOSED LANDSCAPE Cx/i LFUIG14TINIG U) z0 o • PROPOSED ART IN ( ) EXISTING CANOPY TREE SIC PLACES d n- z U Z Q U) to O 0 W o U Uj Q U W ~ d Q U o 0 U U z W r 0>- 0 JO U Q m Q = z U � d m in J d U Q Q O -i W >- O d I LLI I W o 2 U 0 (n > Q W Q U 0 = (n rF Q W � L W W D -3 0 D W z (n W d ] pC Q cy W - o z U LL LL Q) z> �I > Q I� o W w W W= - x W O Z Q W It W O Q O Q J 0 W z 0 Q U W Lu a -d O Z LL m 0— 01_ cn p� �' m— �[ U O[ m U— U— UJ in Wx N — Q j W . . . . . . . . . El. CO AL WAY (SW 22N A+ A A+ A, A + A A A+ A A + A )T.) AA A+A )A AA) A+A 31 ; - W Q o � Z � - � J � - ) W W Q Q !– U) Y U 111 }Ll Qd Q QQ I IzLU Qm U p[ Q m W = j Q O � oc WU I `� za I n w O Q W w U o w d J Q Q O 1— 0 Q (n pc O z UQ pc o w z U U g 0 U D1 CIL N -J U z m (n Q oc 0 � o �� Q cvm dU (Wn O Y O < 0� d WO U ' `L 5 THOUGH CURB AND GUTTER WAS CONSIDERED ALONG TI -E MEDIANS FOR TWE ROADS AREA, THE SUBSTANTIAL COST DEEMED THIS OPTION NOT FEASIBLE AS PART OF THIS PROJECT. A POSSIBLE ALTERNATIVE COULD BE A COMBINATION OF CURB AND GUTTER ALONG WITH FLUMES PLACED EVERY 15 FT TO 30 FT. THIS ALTERNATIVE WOULD REOUIRE THAT GRADING OF THE U W ROADWAY BE DONE AS PART OF THE DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS. BASE INFORMATION FOR THIS DOCUMENT IS BASED ON AVAILABLE DATA, WHICH INCLUDES FOOT ROADWAY PLANS, AERIALS, AND FIELD OBSERVATION, FUTURE PLANS WILL REQUIRE AN UPDATED, SIGNED AND SEALED TOPOG12AP14ICAU BOUNDARY SLRVEY. TLE EXACT LOCATIONS OF DRIVEWAYS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE BASED ON TLE UPDATED SURVEY EDGE ZONE (PARALLEL PARKINGIELLBOUTS) Cora[_Way Beautification Master Man at Design Standards City of Miami © 2002 Urban Resource Group - A division of Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc. a—� PROPOSE) IRRIGATION ZONE 03- 884 MAN PLANTING Ofp,PROPOSEDCANOPY QTREES RIGHT OF WAY rl EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT ALLOWABLE ENIOROAp.#ti 'p PROPOSE FLOWERING PROPOS® BUILDING SETBACK ® ZONE POR AWNINGS, ARCADES. COLONNADES. E BALCONIES ( TRIS EXISTING PALMS U PROPOSED VE3NICU-AR AREA SETBACK PROPOSED PALMS W IWI SIDEWALK ZONE O EXISTING BANYAN TRIM PROPOSED LANDSCAPE Cx/i LFUIG14TINIG LANDSCAPE AREA • PROPOSED ART IN ( ) EXISTING CANOPY TREE SIC PLACES EDGE ZONE (PARALLEL PARKINGIELLBOUTS) Cora[_Way Beautification Master Man at Design Standards City of Miami © 2002 Urban Resource Group - A division of Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc. a—� PROPOSE) IRRIGATION ZONE 03- 884 -- W C[ 0 8LLp M z oIL z oz ry Q d W O Q ly w 0(D Q Q W z W U Z Q cn W I z U z > I ry LL Q p Q p U � z W m J- NJ ICY � Q t z d O z � u rQ W Q U I p O= O W z U, c~n -- J �� �-�- ------------------ Q M N ORAL WAY (SW 2 ST.) rP.OPOSED OUTD O SEATING AR A • • • —�—• • mi • j • • •�• � • --A 31 3 v II.1 ----� ---- Q � 3: 7 m IW C] U U D( — LLJ�_� zLL ILL Q � N o p L BERTY GAS 5 4 O GEJ62AL NOTES i ` MEDIAN PLANTING O'..:1 PROPOSED CANOPY O THOUGH CURB AND GUTTER WAS CONSIDERED ALONG THE MEDIANS FOR THE ROADS AREA, THE SUBSTANTIAL COST DEEMED 1 1 M RIGHT OF WAY TREES THIS OPTION NOT FEASIBLE AS PART OF THIS PROJECT. A POSSIBLE ALTERNATIVE COULD BE A COMBINATION OF CURB AND EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT ®A ALLOWABLE ENCROACHMENT PROPOSED RV�U U 2ING [—� GUTTER ALONG WITH FLUMES PLACED EVERY 15 FT TO 30 FT. THIS ALTERNATIVE WOULD REQUIRE THAT GRADING OF THE ZONE FOR ES, AWNINGS, ARCADTRIS U W EU–' W ROADWAY BE DONE AS PART OF THE DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS. PROPOSED BUILDING SETBACK COLONNADES, E BALCONIES } EXISTING PALMS BASE INFORMATION FOR THIS DOCUMENT IS BASED ON AVAILABLE DATA, WHICH INCLUDES FDOT ROADWAY PLANS, AERIALS, PRDPosI� VEHIICtA.AR AREA SETBACK pROP0.'® PA AND FIELD OBSERVATION. FUTURE PLANS WILL REQUIRE AN UPDATED, SIGNED AND SEALED TOPOGRAPHICAL/ BOUNDARY(6 -- - --- SIDEWALK ZONE O EXISTING BANYAN TRIS � PROPOSED LANDSCAPE /• � SURVEY. UPLIGHTING Scale: 1" = 50' THE EXACT LOCATIONS OF DRIVEWAYS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE BASED ON THE UPDATED SURVEY. LANDSCAPE AREA • PROPOSED ART IN 0� 50� O EXISTING CANOPY TREE PUBLIC PLACES EDGE ZONE IPARALLH- PARKING/E1-LB0UTS> F-- -----� PROPOSED IRRIGATION ZONE EXISTING AND PROPOSED DRIVEWAYS 03- 884 Cora[ Way Beautification Master Man g Design Standards City of Miami - © 2002 Urban Resource Group - A division of Kiley -Horn and Associates, Inc. F (D — I W U L LL L O �-- 0 I MEDIAN PL4NTING (�� j i C9 H Z EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT Y TREES PROPOSED FLOWERING U GUTTER ALONG WITH FLUMES PLACED EVERY 15 FT TO 30 FT. THIS ALTERNATIVE WOULD REQUIRE THAT GRADING OF THE ROADWAY LL gLLowABLE HJCROACLWBJ7 / / � ZONE FOR AWNINGS. TREES `W BE DONE AS PART OF THE DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS. PROPOSED BUILDING SETBACK 40 oT U EXISTING PALMS x BASE INFORMATION FOR THIS DOCUMENT IS BASED ON AVAILABLE DATA, WHICH INCLUDES FDOT ROADWAY PLANS, AERIALS. AND FIELD OBSERVATION. FUTURE PLANS WILL PEOU112E AN UPDATED, SIGNED AND SEALED TOPOGRAPHICAL/ BOUNDARY SURVEY. PROPOSED vEHICLLAR AREA SETBACK f J SIDEWALK ZONE t EXISTING BANYAN TREE PROPOSED PALMS PROPOSED LANDSCAPE Scale: 1" = 50' Z UPLIGHTING THE EXACT LOCATIONS OF DRIVEWAYS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE BASED ON THE UPDATED SURVEY. LANDSCAPE AREA PROPOSED ART IN 01 50 EDGE ZONE (PARALLEL PARKING/BULBOUTS) EXISTING CANOPY TREE c----O.-i PUBLIC PLACES PROPOSED IRRIGATION ZONE O _ - EXISTING AND PROPOSED Coraf Way BtULdficuTim Matter Plan & I� aQ ity Cf dial r © 2002 Urban Resource Group - A division or Kimley-Hmv and Associates, Inc. ?m > L>______ O J F (D — I W U L LL L O v v v v A YQAL Y (SW 22ND Slk SQ2%/////zzzA07%/zzz!9Z 2 Od!� minim— J � U O Q > I<� O I �� oW o vQ � a co W° T anOnI d A+ - 0 �-- 0 I MEDIAN PL4NTING (�� j PROPOSED CANOPY C9 H Z EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT Y TREES PROPOSED FLOWERING U GUTTER ALONG WITH FLUMES PLACED EVERY 15 FT TO 30 FT. THIS ALTERNATIVE WOULD REQUIRE THAT GRADING OF THE ROADWAY � / gLLowABLE HJCROACLWBJ7 / / � ZONE FOR AWNINGS. TREES v v v v A YQAL Y (SW 22ND Slk SQ2%/////zzzA07%/zzz!9Z 2 Od!� minim— J � U O Q > I<� O I �� oW o vQ � a co W° T anOnI d A+ - 0 �-- GENERAL NOTE�NOTESlv THOUGH CURB AND GUTTER WAS CONSIDERED ALONG THE MEDIANS FOR THE ROADS AREA, THE SUBSTANTIAL COST DEEMED LEGEND RIGHT OF WAY MEDIAN PL4NTING (�� j PROPOSED CANOPY H THIS OPTION NOT FEASIBLE AS PART OF THIS PROJECT. A POSSIBLE ALTERNATIVE COULD BEA COMBINATION OF CURB AND EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT TREES PROPOSED FLOWERING U GUTTER ALONG WITH FLUMES PLACED EVERY 15 FT TO 30 FT. THIS ALTERNATIVE WOULD REQUIRE THAT GRADING OF THE ROADWAY � / gLLowABLE HJCROACLWBJ7 / / � ZONE FOR AWNINGS. TREES `W BE DONE AS PART OF THE DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS. PROPOSED BUILDING SETBACK 40 ARCADES, COLONNADES. E BALCONIES EXISTING PALMS x BASE INFORMATION FOR THIS DOCUMENT IS BASED ON AVAILABLE DATA, WHICH INCLUDES FDOT ROADWAY PLANS, AERIALS. AND FIELD OBSERVATION. FUTURE PLANS WILL PEOU112E AN UPDATED, SIGNED AND SEALED TOPOGRAPHICAL/ BOUNDARY SURVEY. PROPOSED vEHICLLAR AREA SETBACK f J SIDEWALK ZONE t EXISTING BANYAN TREE PROPOSED PALMS PROPOSED LANDSCAPE Scale: 1" = 50' UPLIGHTING THE EXACT LOCATIONS OF DRIVEWAYS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE BASED ON THE UPDATED SURVEY. LANDSCAPE AREA PROPOSED ART IN 01 50 EDGE ZONE (PARALLEL PARKING/BULBOUTS) EXISTING CANOPY TREE c----O.-i PUBLIC PLACES PROPOSED IRRIGATION ZONE _ - EXISTING AND PROPOSED Coraf Way BtULdficuTim Matter Plan & D SLai jdaldb DRIVEWAYS ity Cf dial r © 2002 Urban Resource Group - A division or Kimley-Hmv and Associates, Inc. ON A U W W 03- 884 THE EXACT LOCATIONS OF DRIVEWAYS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE BASED ON THE UPDATED SURVEY. Coral 03- 884 "� JIVCWHVC LVIC -"'' ""- -- • LPLIG IN Scale: 1" = 50' (PLIGHTIN �— " —' G —+ LANDSCAPE AREA O O PROPOSED ART IN O' S0' EXISTING CANOPY TREE PUBLIC PLACES EDGE ZONE PARALLEL PARKING/BLLBOUTS) F—� PROPOSED IRRIGATION ZONE EXISTING AND PROPOSED DRIVEWAYS Btuafficudm M anter Plan & D ebign SLai daidb. C ky Cf M idi 114 -- © 2002 Urban R2source Group - A division of Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc. r H W W x O GENERAL NOTES (~ THOUGH CURB AND GUTTER WAS CONSIDERED ALONG THE MEDIANS FOR THE ROADS AREA, THE SUBSTANTIAL COST DEEMED THIS OPTION NOT FEASIBLE AS PART OF THIS PROJECT. A POSSIBLE ALTERNATIVE COULD BE A COMBINATION OF CLQB AND U E- GUTTER ALONG WITH FLUMES PLACED EVERY 15 FT TO 30 FT. THIS ALTERNATIVE WOULD REQUIRE THAT GRADING OF THE (� ROADWAY BE DONE AS PART OF THE DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS. �I x BASE INFORMATION FOR THIS DOCUMENT IS BASED ON AVAILABLE DATA. WHICH INCLUDES FDOT ROADWAY PLANS, AERIALS, AND FIELD OBSERVATION. FUTURE PLANS WILL REQUIRE AN UPDATED, SIGNED AND SEALED TOPOGRAPHICAL/ BOUNDARY SURVEY. THE EXACT LOCATIONS OF DRIVEWAYS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE BASED ON THE UPDATED SURVEY. N LEGEND O RIGHT OF WAY MEDIAN PLANTING Q'��PROPOSED CANOPY �-4 Vi EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT ® ALLOWABLE ENCROACI- E PROPOSED FLOWERING x PROPOSED BUILDING SETBACK ZONE FOR AWNINGS. ARCADES, U W LU 7 COLONNADES. E BALCONIES'} J m Q EXISTING PALMS PROPOSED V541CUAR AREA SETBACK z o SIDEWALK ZONE W EXISTING BANYAN TREE • PROPOSED LANDSCAPE Scale: 1" = 50' LPLIGHTING LANDSCAPE AREA z 0150' Q PUBLIC PLACES EDGE ZONE (PARALLEL PARKING/6LlBOUTS) �.---O---i Z d Q Z EX STING AND PROPOSED V � Z Q U d Q Q O U � p O W CY Q z �= Q ci O LU Z W p� Q m J z OLU `= Z O cn ly — a D[ U LL O U Q Q > m m Q Q I m O J U Z Q U Q a- d W > y 1)[ W OW( Z > LL ?- Z Z 1- Q LU 01 I d �Q 0O = i Q Q U� J �[ d J Q O �[ V U m J _D u D Z W F- Q U W d ELL), � Uj W I- W (y 0 v r P r r P r r • r r P 1PAL WAY (SW 22ND ST.) 2 2 I (�I�• I �I I r l I I .,{ r I I IX I I I INONE I F1111111Ay T' I P IP P r W O z F N 0 O Q Q U W MA ATPON GAS �l Q Q N � Q U) I Q U) > ZZ Q UUJ U Z p U z U) U p LU z - _ W Q > W Z CY ~ � O[ W W Z O Q > Q UO _ _ u- 0 Q O Z Z 0 O— U ISL O Q m ~ W Q (Y p W Q Q Q Q Q J 0 0 W Q U U > m dm 0-J UJ Q p FL z p cn = O U 4 40 O GENERAL NOTES (~ THOUGH CURB AND GUTTER WAS CONSIDERED ALONG THE MEDIANS FOR THE ROADS AREA, THE SUBSTANTIAL COST DEEMED THIS OPTION NOT FEASIBLE AS PART OF THIS PROJECT. A POSSIBLE ALTERNATIVE COULD BE A COMBINATION OF CLQB AND U E- GUTTER ALONG WITH FLUMES PLACED EVERY 15 FT TO 30 FT. THIS ALTERNATIVE WOULD REQUIRE THAT GRADING OF THE (� ROADWAY BE DONE AS PART OF THE DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS. �I x BASE INFORMATION FOR THIS DOCUMENT IS BASED ON AVAILABLE DATA. WHICH INCLUDES FDOT ROADWAY PLANS, AERIALS, AND FIELD OBSERVATION. FUTURE PLANS WILL REQUIRE AN UPDATED, SIGNED AND SEALED TOPOGRAPHICAL/ BOUNDARY SURVEY. THE EXACT LOCATIONS OF DRIVEWAYS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE BASED ON THE UPDATED SURVEY. N LEGEND O RIGHT OF WAY MEDIAN PLANTING Q'��PROPOSED CANOPY �-4 Vi EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT ® ALLOWABLE ENCROACI- E PROPOSED FLOWERING x PROPOSED BUILDING SETBACK ZONE FOR AWNINGS. ARCADES, U W COLONNADES. E BALCONIES'} EXISTING PALMS PROPOSED V541CUAR AREA SETBACK PROPOSED PALMS IWi-1 SIDEWALK ZONE O EXISTING BANYAN TREE • PROPOSED LANDSCAPE Scale: 1" = 50' LPLIGHTING LANDSCAPE AREA PROPOSED ART IN 0150' EXISTING CANOPY TRE'_ PUBLIC PLACES EDGE ZONE (PARALLEL PARKING/6LlBOUTS) �.---O---i PROPOSED IRRIGATION ZONE - EX STING AND PROPOSED DRIVEWAYS nv�Coral_ Way Beautification /'Master/'MasterMan a Desi City of Miami © 2002 Urban Resource (group - A division of Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc. Standards 03- 884 O, MEDIAN PLANTING TEXACO CANOPY O I U Z O TREES PROPOSED FLOWERING W EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT ALLOWABLE BNINGS, ARCADES. ZONE FOR AWNINGS. ARCADES. O Q IW U [~ —� PROPOSED BUILDING SETBACK d C9 COLOfJJADFS. E BALCONIES Q (D X_ — X v- zI� t 0 O Z Q Scale: 1” = 50' z O • tPLI(4rING PROPOSED ART IN LANDSCAPE AREA 0' 50' O ENISTING CANOPY TREE f--o--i PIBLIC PLACES PROPOSED IRRIGATION ZONE EDGE ZONE tPARALLF1 PARKING/BU90UTSI A +A lzz�z.m_© �+A,A . ` . I— W OJ X (g oz Z zCY -PROPOS D MEDIAN EXTEN ON CORA AY (SW 2 ST.) 4\ K- 2 ISM."011 @00/43/ 0 01mr1m FAVAIKAKAVAPFANFAMAVAIMOFAIVA 11: 11 11: 11 FAFAVAM „ I m .. . / � . /,10,- Q GENERAL NOTES E -I 'e THOUGH CURB AND GUTTER WAS CONSIDERED ALONG THE MEDIANS FOR THE ROADS AREA, THE SUBSTANTIAL COST DEEMED [- THIS OPTION NOT FEASIBLE AS PART OF THIS PROJECT. A POSSIBLE ALTERNATIVE COULD BE A COMBINATION OF CURB AND x+ GUTTER ALONG WITH FLUMES PLACED EVERY 15 FT TO 30 FT. THIS ALTERNATIVE WOULD REQUIRE THAT GRADING OF THE UW ROADWAY BE DONE AS PART OF THE DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS. Q� W BASE INFORMATION FOR THIS DOCUMENT IS BASED ON AVAILABLE DATA, WHICH INCLUDES FDOT ROADWAY PLANS, AERIALS, AND FIELD OBSERVATION. FUTURE PLANS WILL PEOUIRE AN UPDATED, SIGNED AND SEALED TOPOGRAPHICAL/ BOUNDARY SURVEY. THE EXACT LOCATIONS OF DRIVEWAYS ARE SUB -ECT TO CHANGE BASED ON THE UPDATED SURVEY 033- 884 A-rA N MEDIAN PLANTING (%� I.-' jPROPOSED CANOPY O RIGWT OF WAY p TREES PROPOSED FLOWERING W EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT ALLOWABLE BNINGS, ARCADES. ZONE FOR AWNINGS. ARCADES. TR�.S U [~ —� PROPOSED BUILDING SETBACK COLOfJJADFS. E BALCONIES � EXISTING PAINS �y W PROPOSED �I�Al2 AREA S�ACK SIDEWALK ZONE t 0 IXISTING BANYAN TREE PROPOSED PALMS PROPOSED LANDSCAPE Scale: 1” = 50' • tPLI(4rING PROPOSED ART IN LANDSCAPE AREA 0' 50' O ENISTING CANOPY TREE f--o--i PIBLIC PLACES PROPOSED IRRIGATION ZONE EDGE ZONE tPARALLF1 PARKING/BU90UTSI _ - EXISTING AND PROPOSED DRIVEWAYS Cora[ Way Beautification /Master P[an st Design Standards �" City of Miami - - © 2002 Urban Resource Group - Adivision of Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc. -- -- -•- — -- , • ..-- —,- .civ -r --v, Vi 11— -- JL — I VrV--HlV / []VUVVHKI SURVEY. THE EXACT LOCATIONS OF DRIVEWAYS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE BASED ON THE UPDATED SURVEY. Scale: 1" = 50' 0' 50' oral Way B.z-x--2uflfiudrjcn N & D C ity Cf Midi I J © 2002 Urban Resource GCOUP - A division of Kimlcy-Horn and Associates, Inc. L JIVCWALF, ZUNM LANDSCAPE AREA EDGE ZONE (PARALLEL PARKING/BLLBOUTS) Swidaidb I T I amnio I nw or+v i r„v i icc� EXISTING CANOPY TREE PROPOSED LANDSCAPE UPLIGHTING O PROPOSEO ART IN PUBLIC PLACES fyl PROPOSED IRRIGATION ZONE EXISTING AND PROPOSED DRIVEWAYS 03- 884 ai(-t *—. _— T I I PARKING LOT CO z MEDIAN PLANTING Q( -j C0 z O n - Q � p TREES PROPOSED FLOWERING y I� j1r EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT ALLOWABLE ENCROAC14MENT ZONE FOR AWNINGS, ARCADES. z vy [~ �J PROPOSED BUILDING SETBACK W (~j O m U OL V-- SIDEWALK ZONE KI I O O ~� Q IL U oc 9) � U EXISTING CANOPY TREE O c——� PLBLIC PLACES PROPOSED IRRIGATION ZONE LU I Q O Q Q ILUU CD --------n— Q -z— PARKING LOT z- >- CD Q W � o O U z u? /nen O w O Q C0 W U O C0 W U Q U O ILL O � J 0 CD z MEDIAN PLANTING Q( -j CD Q 00 n - Q � p TREES PROPOSED FLOWERING y I� j1r EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT ALLOWABLE ENCROAC14MENT ZONE FOR AWNINGS, ARCADES. vy [~ �J PROPOSED BUILDING SETBACK COLONNADES, E BALCONIES EXISTING PALMS O m U OL V-- SIDEWALK ZONE EXISTING EXISTING BANYAN TREE � Z I Scale: I"= 50' - U m d LANDSCAPE AREA • 9) Q U EXISTING CANOPY TREE O c——� PLBLIC PLACES PROPOSED IRRIGATION ZONE z- >- CD Q W � o O U z u? /nen O w O Q C0 W U O C0 W U Q U O ILL O � J 0 CD z MEDIAN PLANTING Q( -j CD Q 00 n - Q � p �wJ \ RAL WA (SW 2ND ST.) A A+A� A A+A A A Al A A A A+,& 0) m MIAMI. • n — LU J z Q Q L O m Ill U U z i_ < Q Q mac, " - GENERAL NOTES THOUGH OLRB AND GUTTER WAS CONSIDERED ALONG THE MEDIANS FOR THE ROADS AREA, THE SUBSTANTIAL COST DEEMED THIS OPTION NOT FEASIBLE AS PART OF THIS PROJECT. A POSSIBLE ALTERNATIVE COULD BE A COMBINATION OF CURB AND U (~ GUTTER ALONG WITH FLUMES PLACED EVERY 15 FT TO 30 FT. THIS ALTERNATIVE WORD REQUIRE THAT GRADING OF THE �W ROADWAY BE DONE AS PART OF THE DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS. BASE INFORMATION FOR THIS DOCUMENT IS BASED ON AVAILABLE DATA, WHICH INCLUDES FDOT ROADWAY PLANS, AERIALS, c V] AND FIELD OBSERVATION, FUTURE PLANS WILL REQUIRE AN UPDATED, SIGNED AND SEALED TOPOGRAPHICAL/ BOUNDARY SURVEY, THE EXACT LOCATIONS OF DRIVEWAYS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE BASED ON THE UPDATED SURVEY. 03- 884 z Cv O 10 PARKW BLDG. / ARTURO / DIFILIPPI EDUCATIOI CENTER 00, '1 / �6 N ♦ OF WAY MEDIAN PLANTING Q( -j PROPOSED CANOPY 00 RIGHT p TREES PROPOSED FLOWERING y I� j1r EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT ALLOWABLE ENCROAC14MENT ZONE FOR AWNINGS, ARCADES. vy [~ �J PROPOSED BUILDING SETBACK COLONNADES, E BALCONIES EXISTING PALMS PROPOSED VEHICULAR AREA SETBACK y PROPOSED PALMS �I SIDEWALK ZONE EXISTING EXISTING BANYAN TREE � PROPOSED LANDSCAPE I Scale: I"= 50' - UPLIGHTING LANDSCAPE AREA • PROPOSED ART IN O' S0' EDGE ZONE (PARALLEL PARKING/BU-BOUTS) EXISTING CANOPY TREE O c——� PLBLIC PLACES PROPOSED IRRIGATION ZONE _ - EXISTING AND PROPOSED OR Coral Vey Bwutjfiwdcn M aster Plan & D ebign Star xiaidb � C ity d M iai d ` © 2002 Urban ROsollfce Group - A division of Kimicy-Horn and Associates, Inc. ' 5 ' 6 I 0 / �� / P�� OHO Q'P� , , ///2' UNITED WAY X3250 I , N I PARKING LOT I QJ , / 6 STORIES UNITED WAY n 1 I STORY—j - - — — — — — C 7 7*7.@;. ORAL WAY CS 2ND ST.) :� � moi► DR CLEAN PARKING LOT I TORY � I O t— GENERAL NOTES- UII` TWOUGH CURB AND GUTTER WAS CONSIDERED ALONG THE MEDIANS FOR THE ROADS AREA, THE SUBSTANTIAL COST DEEMED (~ THIS OPTION NOT FEASIBLE AS PART OF THIS PROJECT. A POSSIBLE ALTERNATIVE COULD BE A COMBINATION OF CURB AND W GUTTER ALONG WITH FLUMES PLACED EVERY 15 FT TO 30 FT. THIS ALTERNATIVE WOULD REQUIRE THAT GRADING OF THE W ROADWAY BE DONE AS PART OF THE DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS. BASE INFORMATION FOR THIS DOCUMENT IS BASED ON AVAILABLE DATA, WHICH INCLUDES FDOT ROADWAY PLANS, AERIALS, AND FELD OBSERVATION. FUTURE PLANS WILL REQUIRE AN UPDATED, SIGNED AND SEALED TOPOGRAPHICAU BOUNDARY SURVEY. THE EXACT LOCATIONS OF DRIVEWAYS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE BASED ON THE UPDATED SURVEY. U3195 MEDICAL OFFICES 1 2 STORIES RESIDENTIAL tt3103-3107 2 STORIES I ENTERPRISE RESIDENTIAL I PRODUCTIONS 2 STORIES �lLEGEND Y MINIM RIGHT OF WAY MR:)1AN PLANTING Q `;) PROPOSED CANOPY TREES EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT ®ALLOWABLE ENCROACHPROPOSED FLOWERING ME3JT � TREES PROPOSED BUILDING SETBACK ZONE FOR AWNINGS. ARCADES. COLONNADES. E BALCONIES v EXISTING PALMS PROPOSED VEI-IICUAR AREA SETBACK PROPOSED PALMS SIDEWALK ZONE t EXISTING BANYAN TREE PROPOSED LANDSCAPE Scale: 1" = 50'—'- -- (.PLIGHTING LANDSCAPE AREA • PROPOSED ART IN O' 50' EXISTING CANOPY TREE PUBLIC PLACES EDGE ZONE (PARALLEL PARKING/Bl1BOUiS) 'y —, PROPOSED IRRIGATION ZONE EXISTING AND PROPOSED DRIVEWAYS Cora[Way Beautification Master Plan & Design Standard's City of Miami © 2002 Urban Resource Group - A division of Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc. 03- 884 1 I tt3000 1 1 1 RESIDENTIAL 112 STORIES 1 I� L---------- 1 I I I 1 =2950 1 0 1 I RESIDENTIAL 1O STORIES 3: co l_ .. _ _ — �, :�,•, -;j��, .� ., % ��, fir✓ 1 � I I l � 144 go (e5 — j CO L WAY (SW D ST.) \ �� • +• A+A • +♦ } •+• • �-• • _____ t - I INS rr3051 STORIESRESIDENTIAL i% %Jfil { �•� � I o 0 tt3025 RE SIDENTI L 2 STORIE tt3001 D LAO 2 I 1 TORIE t*2933 OFFICE BLDG. • STORY 0\ N -1 o tt2929 Dc OFFICE BLDG 1 6 STORIES I 1 OGENERAL NOTES I MEDIAN PLANTING (%��,� PROPOSED CANOPY [—i C 00 ` Y THOUGH CURB AND GUTTER WAS CONSIDERED ALONG THE MEDIANS FOR TIE ROADS AREA, THE SUBSTANTIAL COST DEEMED r OF THIS PROJECT. A POSSIBLE ALTERNATIVE COULD BE A COMBINATION OF CURB AND 11 RIGHT OF WAY pp TREES PROPOSED R OWERING OC x F- THIS OPTION NOT FEASIBLE AS PART GUTTEi2 ALONG WITH FLUMES PLACED EVERY 15 FT TO 30 FT. THIS ALTERNATIVE WOULD REQUIRE THAT GRADING OF THE EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT ALLOWABLE ENCROACHMENT ® ZONE FOR AWNINGS, ARCADES, JD TREES U U F- U W ROADWAY BE DONE AS PART OF THE DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS. PROPOSED BUILDING SETBACK COLONNADES, E BALCONIES { EXISTING PALMS W W BASE INFORMATION FOR THIS DOCUMENT IS BASED ON AVAILABLE DATA, WHICH INCLUDES FDOT ROADWAY PLANS, AERIALS. PROPOSED VBIICI1AR AREA SETBACK PROPOSED PALMS <4 C4f) AND FELD OBSERVATION. FUTURE PLANS WILL PEOUIRE AN UPDATED, SIGNED AND SEALED TOPOGRAPHICAL/ BOUNDARY -- SIDEWALK ZONEO EXISTING BANYAN TREE PROPOSED LANDSCAPE SURVEY. Scale: 1" = 50' —" (PLIGHTING THE EXACT LOCATIONS OF DRIVEWAYS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE BASED ON TI E UPDATED SURVEY. LANDSCAPE AREA O EXISTING CANOPY TREE PROPOSED ART IN PI ELIC PLACES 0 50� c--iuiI PROPOSED IRRIGATION ZONE Cora[ Way B 03- 884 EDGE ZONE !PARALLEL PARKING/BU90LrrS7 EXIND STING APROPOSED DRIVEWAYS eautification master Plan & Design Standards City of Miami -- © 2002 Urban Resource GrOUP -A division of Kintley-Horn and Associates, Inc. I =2840 BLDG ALLOY E MALLOI 01 OFFICE2 STORIESVACANT LOT — 2 STORIES JCIO co VON A �a Jmw z� iia li:n. QGENERAL NOTES! THOUGH CURB AND GUTTER WAS CONSIDERED ALONG THE MEDIANS FOR THE ROADS AREA, THE SUBSTANTIAL COST DEEMED UTHIS OPTION NOT FEASIBLE AS PART OF THIS PROJECT. A POSSIBLE ALTERNATIVE COLD BE A COMBINATION OF CURB AND W GUTTER ALONG WITH FLUMES PLACED EVERY 15 FT TO 30 FT. THIS ALTERNATIVE WOULD REQUIRE THAT GRADING OF THE [-� W ROADWAY BE DONE AS PART OF THE DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS. x BASE INFORMATION FOR THIS DOCUMENT IS BASED ON AVAILABLE DATA, WHICH INCLUDES FDOT ROADWAY PLANS, AERIALS, AND FIELD OBSERVATION. FUTURE PLANS WILL REQUIRE AN UPDATED, SIGNED AND SEALED TOPOGRAPHICAL/ BOUNDARY SURVEY. THE EXACT LOCATIONS OF DRIVEWAYS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE BASED ON THE UPDATED SURVEY. IU2 0 OFFICE BLDG 10 STORIES — 1 m =2700 OFFICE BLDG 2 STORIES _(VACANT) wpm =2701 X2725 MEDICAL OFFICES I SIDENTI L I STORY STORIE I I LEGEND RIGHT OF WAY MEDIAN PLANTING PROPOSED CANOPY TREES EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT ALLOWABLE ENCROACHMENT �SOSED FLOWERING PRL_L2 PROPOSED BUILDING SETBACK ZONE FOR AWNINGS, ARCADES, COLONNADES, E BALCONIES} EXISTING PALMS PROPOSED VEHICLI-AR AREA SETBACK PROPOSED PALMS Scale: 1" = 50' � - � SIDEWALK ZONEt EXISTING BANYAN TREE � PROPOSED LANDSCAPE UPLIGHTING LANDSCAPE AREA • PROPOSED ART IN 01 50 O EXISTING CANOPY TREE PUBLIC PLACES EDGE ZONE (PARALLEL PARKING/BULBOUTS) c---�.-� PROPOSED IRRIGATION ZONE EXISTING AND PROPOSED DRIVEWAYS lyuffll.� Cora[ Wdy &W-3"Lliticurim Nbbrcr Plan & Dt-bim Star jdaidb C jty Cf Mial r j © 2002 Urban Resource Group - A division of Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc. 03- 884 3 tt2530 +� I RESIDENTIAL tt2500 198 tt2600 ( 1 I 7 O S TURNER CONST. I 1 N LLIC2 ONTICS1 2 STORIES ORIESOFFICE BLDG 1 (tel I - 1 10 STORIES L - - - - - - z mel PROPOSED MEDIAN EXTENSION _ CORAL WAY (SW 22ND ST.) ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦+♦ ♦ ♦-1-♦• ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ I9 = . a W 44 1 � 1 1 N I A LA N OFFICE BLDG 1 4 STORIES I 1 1 270 (� 1 (� STE LING I TEMPLE 1 I TORY 4 4 GENERAL NOTES t > MEDIAN PLANTING Q ., TREES CANOPY 0 THOUGH CURB AND GUTTER WAS CONSIDERED ALONG THE MEDIANS FOR THE ROADS AREA, THE SUBSTANTIAL COST DEEMED ` V 1 1 RIGHT OF WAY TREES x THIS OPTION NOT FEASIBLE AS PART OF THIS PROJECT. A POSSIBLE ALTERNATIVE COULD BE A COMBINATION OF CURB AND EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEME1Vf ALLOWABLE ENCROACHMENT PROPOSED FLOWB2ING („) GUTTER ALONG WITH FLUMES PLACED EVERY 15 FT TO 30 FT. THIS ALTERNATIVE WOULD REQUIRE THAT GRADING OF THE PROPOSED BUILDING SETBACK ZONE FOR AWNINGS. ARCADES, TREES U F-. [� W ROADWAY BE DONE AS PART OF THE DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS. COLONNADES, E BALCONIES EXISTING PALMS F- W W PROPOSED VEHICILAR AREA SETBACK PROPOSED PALMS M ITI BASE INFORMATION FOR THIS DOCUMENT IS BASED ON AVAILABLE DATA, WHICH INCLUDES FDOT ROADWAY PLANS, AERIALS,SioEVJALK ZONE O EXISTING BANYAN TREE PROPOSED LANDSCAPE Cn CA AND FIELD OBSERVATION. FUTURE PLANS WILL REOUIRE AN UPDATED, SIGNED AND SEALED TOPOGRAPHICAL/ BOUNDARY — PROPOSED' SURVEY. Scale: 1" = 50' - C PROPOSED ART IN I-ANDSCAPE AREA O PLBLIC PLACES THE EXACT LOCATIONS OF DRIVEWAYS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE BASED ON THE UPDATED SURVEY. EXISTING CANOPY TREE 0� 50� EDGE ZONE PARALLEL PARKING/BLA90UTS) ti PROPOSED IRRIGATION ZONE EXISTING AND PROPOSED DRIVEWAYS 08-- 884 Coral Vey Bwaitkur-im M abLer Plan & D sign SLai daidb C iry d m ial d -- © 2002 Urban RCSDUCce Group -A division of Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. .0• RESIDENTIAL • STORIES A+A #I A+A ( ? A +A •P • STORIES/ r=2360i QESIDENTIAL STORIES -NTI AL RESIDENTIAL i STORIES I!MIIsssWEMM==rA�_rAa1W_A_ ['M A +. A - . D= • OFFICE E3LDG O. A+A))AL A A+A Q � — _ — — — — — — — — — � IRESID TIAL n2211 I IST RY N PARKING LOT RESIDENTIAL I 2 STORIES O ry GENERAL NOTES �T .pp THOUGH CURB AND GUTTER WAS CONSIDERED ALONG THE MEDIANS FOR THE ROADS AREA, THE SUBSTANTIAL COST DEEMED ` Y rTi THIS OPTION NOT FEASIBLE AS PART OF THIS PROJECT. A POSSIBLE ALTERNATIVE COULD BE A COMBINATION OF CURB AND NGUTTER ALONG WITH FLUMES PLACED EVERY 15 FT TO 30 FT. THIS ALTERNATIVE WOULD REQUIRE THAT GRADING OF THE W ROADWAY BE DONE AS PART OF THE DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS. �Q x BASE INFORMATION FOR THIS DOCUMENT IS BASED ON AVAILABLE DATA, WHICH INCLUDES FDOT ROADWAY PLANS, AERIALS, AND FIELD OBSERVATION. FUTURE PLANS WILL REQUIRE AN UPDATED, SIGNED AND SEALED TOPOGRAPHICAL/ BOUNDARY SURVEY. Scale: 1" = 50, THE EXACT LOCATIONS OF DRIVEWAYS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE BASED ON THE UPDATED SURVEY. 01 50, 4 MEDIAN PLANTING (D PROPOSED CANOPY RIGWT OF WAY TREES EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT ALLOWABLE ENCROACHMENT p PROPOSED FLOWERING ® ZONE FOR AWNINGS, ARCADES. TREES PROPOSED BUILDING SETBACK COLONNADES, E BALCONIES > EXISTING PALMS PROPOSM V541CLLAIZ AREA SETBACK PROPOSED PALMS �— SIDEWALK ZONE t EXISTING BANYAN TREE . PROPOSED LANDSCAPE PRPOSING LANDSCAPE AREA • PROPOSED ART IN EXISTING CANOPY TREE PUBLIC PLACES EDGE ZONE PARALLEL PARKING/ElLUMTS) M---�--, PROPOSED IRRIGATION ZONE _ - EX STINGS AND PROPOSED DRIVEWAYS qj= Cora[Way Beautification /Master Plan & Design Standards City of Miami - 2002 Urban Resource Group - A division of Kirnley-Horn and Associates, Inc. M 00 W W 884 SI1 S � 1111111111111113 :NT I n2140 z2110 I ! DRY , I RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL I p� 7 STORIES 7 STORIES— I ! NL---------- J N CID CIO �. PROPOSED MEDIAN EXTF-NSIO",----7-------- A A RES 2 TORI D D1 N N W w =2121 INTERNATIONAL BANK 9 STORIES 2 STORI 0 A I i -1 - I "I" i I =2031 I R SIDENTI L STORIES I �--OMMERCIAL U2021 RESIDENTIAL I STORY 2 STORIES +A A ( A+A 0 MEDIAN PLANTING p: _,7 PROPOSED CANOPY O (-+ N GENERAL NOTES '` V 1 1 RIGHT OF WAY T5 E"' -'t M 00 THOUGH CLRB AND GUTTER WAS CONSIDERED ALONG THE MEDIANS FOR THE ROADS AREA, THE SUBSTANTIAL COST DEEMED p� PROPOSED FLOWERING =00 W THIS OPTION NOT FEASIBLE AS PART OF THIS PROJECT. A POSSIBLE ALTERNATIVE COULD BE A COMBINATION OF CURB AND EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT ALLOWABLE ENCROACHMENT ` U GUTTER ALONG WITH FLUMES PLACED EVERY 15 FT TO 30 FT. THIS ALTERNATIVE WOULD REQUIRE THAT GRADING OF THE �� ZONE FOR AWNINGS. ARCADES. Trze�S U j� PROPOSED BUILDING SETBACK COLONNADES, E BALCONIES IXISTING PALMS [� W [~ W ROADWAY BE DONE AS PART OF THE DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS. W PROPOSED VB-IICLLAR AREA SETBACK ^ PROPOSED PALMS x x BASE INFORMATION FOR THIS DOCUMENT IS BASED ON AVAILABLE DATA, WHICH INCLUDES FDOT ROADWAY PLANS, AERIALS, + EXISTING BANYAN TREE (/] AND FIELD OBSERVATION. FUTURE PLANS WILL REOUIRE AN UPDATED, SIGNED AND SEALED TOPOGRAPHICAL/ BOUNDARY _ SIDEWALK ZONE PROPOSED LANDSCAPE SURVEY. Scale: 1" = 50, ` -- - - (PLIGHTING 03- 884 Cora[ Way Beautification Master Mang Design Standards City of Miami © 2002 Urban Resource Group -A division of Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 9 • ;?ESIDEN� IAL =1918 " • �I •P . •: r1:S I STY • •. I STOQ %i • I WON w' �+ iii ii ��� �r ��� �� i.� (i.•� {._� r� lii•i ♦+♦ ♦♦+ ♦ ♦ ♦+ ♦ ♦ ♦ +A I enGENERAL NOTES00 hrl THOUGH CURB AND GUTTER WAS CONSIDERED ALONG THE MEDIANS FOR THE ROADS AREA, THE SUBSTANTIAL COST DEEMED rr UU E.I THIS OPTION NOT FEASIBLE AS PART OF THIS PROJECT. A POSSIBLE ALTERNATIVE COULD BE A COMBINATION OF CURB AND W GUTTER ALONG WITH FLUMES PLACED EVERY 15 FT TO 30 FT. THIS ALTERNATIVE WOULD REQUIRE THAT GRADING OF THE �] ROADWAY BE DONE AS PART OF THE DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS. BASE INFORMATION FOR THIS DOCUMENT IS BASED ON AVAILABLE DATA, WHICH INCLUDES FDOT ROADWAY PLANS, AERIALS, AND FIELD OBSERVATION. FUTURE PLANS WILL REOUQE AN UPDATED, SIGNED AND SEALED TOPOGRAPHICAL/ BOUNDARY SURVEY. Scale: 1" - 50' THE EXACT LOCATIONS OF DRIVEWAYS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE BASED ON THE UPDATED SURVEY. 0' 50' � Cora[ 1�1tc y Beauiific:aticn MabLcr Plc* &D pi C j�y Cf Mill I © 2002 Urban Resource Group - A division of Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Thi 1853-185 R SIDENTI L STORIE tt1859-1865 RESIDENTIAL 2 STORIES 1 � m tt1835 RESIDENTIAL 2 STORIES VACANT LOT PARKING LOT SIDENTI L STORIE LEGEND - •055 V :.• w •r.. i iyi 2 i�z li: i _ i..i w6 i. i ui z .a 2 id f w .; a : • TREES jopA EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT ALLOWABLE ENCROACHMENT • • op H PROPOSED BUILDING SETBACK ZONE FOR AWNINGS, ARCADES, COMME 1010 U W COLONNADES, E BALCONIES "' EXISTING PALMS PROPOSED VEHICULAR AREA SETBACKy PROPOSED PALMS �1 � •� mI f EXISTING BANYAN TREE oil PROPOSED LANDSCAPE UPLIGHTING LANDSCAPE AREA • PROPOSED ART IN EXISTING CANOPY TREE PUBLIC PLACES EDGE ZONE (PARALI R PARKING/BU BOUTS) �— a�---� PROPOSED IRRIGATION ZONE /Ilrmwmwm %/////%►���.I///�//�/////////�////////I EXISTING AND PROPOSED Iffi ;; =zEm;-im enGENERAL NOTES00 hrl THOUGH CURB AND GUTTER WAS CONSIDERED ALONG THE MEDIANS FOR THE ROADS AREA, THE SUBSTANTIAL COST DEEMED rr UU E.I THIS OPTION NOT FEASIBLE AS PART OF THIS PROJECT. A POSSIBLE ALTERNATIVE COULD BE A COMBINATION OF CURB AND W GUTTER ALONG WITH FLUMES PLACED EVERY 15 FT TO 30 FT. THIS ALTERNATIVE WOULD REQUIRE THAT GRADING OF THE �] ROADWAY BE DONE AS PART OF THE DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS. BASE INFORMATION FOR THIS DOCUMENT IS BASED ON AVAILABLE DATA, WHICH INCLUDES FDOT ROADWAY PLANS, AERIALS, AND FIELD OBSERVATION. FUTURE PLANS WILL REOUQE AN UPDATED, SIGNED AND SEALED TOPOGRAPHICAL/ BOUNDARY SURVEY. Scale: 1" - 50' THE EXACT LOCATIONS OF DRIVEWAYS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE BASED ON THE UPDATED SURVEY. 0' 50' � Cora[ 1�1tc y Beauiific:aticn MabLcr Plc* &D pi C j�y Cf Mill I © 2002 Urban Resource Group - A division of Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Thi 1853-185 R SIDENTI L STORIE tt1859-1865 RESIDENTIAL 2 STORIES 1 � m tt1835 RESIDENTIAL 2 STORIES VACANT LOT PARKING LOT SIDENTI L STORIE LEGEND - lye V w •r.. i iyi 2 i�z li: i _ i..i w6 i. i ui z .a !I f w 00 TREES jopA EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT ALLOWABLE ENCROACHMENT • • op H PROPOSED BUILDING SETBACK ZONE FOR AWNINGS, ARCADES, 1010 U W COLONNADES, E BALCONIES "' EXISTING PALMS PROPOSED VEHICULAR AREA SETBACKy PROPOSED PALMS �1 � •� mI f EXISTING BANYAN TREE PROPOSED LANDSCAPE UPLIGHTING LANDSCAPE AREA enGENERAL NOTES00 hrl THOUGH CURB AND GUTTER WAS CONSIDERED ALONG THE MEDIANS FOR THE ROADS AREA, THE SUBSTANTIAL COST DEEMED rr UU E.I THIS OPTION NOT FEASIBLE AS PART OF THIS PROJECT. A POSSIBLE ALTERNATIVE COULD BE A COMBINATION OF CURB AND W GUTTER ALONG WITH FLUMES PLACED EVERY 15 FT TO 30 FT. THIS ALTERNATIVE WOULD REQUIRE THAT GRADING OF THE �] ROADWAY BE DONE AS PART OF THE DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS. BASE INFORMATION FOR THIS DOCUMENT IS BASED ON AVAILABLE DATA, WHICH INCLUDES FDOT ROADWAY PLANS, AERIALS, AND FIELD OBSERVATION. FUTURE PLANS WILL REOUQE AN UPDATED, SIGNED AND SEALED TOPOGRAPHICAL/ BOUNDARY SURVEY. Scale: 1" - 50' THE EXACT LOCATIONS OF DRIVEWAYS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE BASED ON THE UPDATED SURVEY. 0' 50' � Cora[ 1�1tc y Beauiific:aticn MabLcr Plc* &D pi C j�y Cf Mill I © 2002 Urban Resource Group - A division of Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Thi 1853-185 R SIDENTI L STORIE tt1859-1865 RESIDENTIAL 2 STORIES 1 � m tt1835 RESIDENTIAL 2 STORIES VACANT LOT PARKING LOT SIDENTI L STORIE LEGEND V RIGHT OF WAY MEDIAN PLANTING, (D, PROPOSED CANOPY 00 TREES EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT ALLOWABLE ENCROACHMENT PROPOSED FLOWERING H PROPOSED BUILDING SETBACK ZONE FOR AWNINGS, ARCADES, TREES U W COLONNADES, E BALCONIES "' EXISTING PALMS PROPOSED VEHICULAR AREA SETBACKy PROPOSED PALMS �1 � SIDEWALK ZONE f EXISTING BANYAN TREE PROPOSED LANDSCAPE UPLIGHTING LANDSCAPE AREA • PROPOSED ART IN EXISTING CANOPY TREE PUBLIC PLACES EDGE ZONE (PARALI R PARKING/BU BOUTS) �— a�---� PROPOSED IRRIGATION ZONE _ - EXISTING AND PROPOSED DRIVEWAYS 1 ST daidb 03- 884 �v Coral Vey Btuaiticarim M aster Plan & D sign Swijdaidb C Jfy cf 03- ^ ^ 4 @2002 Urban RBsource Group - A division of Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. TOTIS FAST MARKET ' I , I STORY LME TO I � I CIAL CO MERCIA Y BAKER tt1700 I SIDDNA YOGA 2 TORIES ORIENTAL Q 2 STORIES p� L -- — 00 ING OT - q� CORAL WAY (SW 22ND ST.) CORAL (SW 22ND TJ - A�l CD ♦ ♦ +♦ ♦ ♦ AL ♦ A,+ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ -�- ♦ • q, Q' ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ + +♦ leg r I U1801 COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL DUBOIS I I 1 STORY I STORY BLDG. PARKING LO 7 STORIES 4 O GENERAL NOTES THOUGH CURB AND GUTTER WAS CONSIDERED ALONG THE MEDIANS FOR THE ROADS AREA, THE SUBSTANTIAL COST DEEMED � 1 1 awl RIGHT OF WAY MEDIAN PLANTING (Y 1 `. J TREES PROPOSED CANOPY14t U FI THIS OPTION NOT FEASIBLE AS PART OF THIS PROJECT. A POSSIBLE ALTERNATIVE COULD BE A COMBINATION OF CURB AND WGUTTER ALONG WITH FLUMES PLACED EVERY 15 FT TO 30 FT. THIS ALTERNATIVE WOULD REQUIRE THAT GRADING OF THE U] ROADWAY BE DONE AS PART OF THE DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS. EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT ��� PROPOSED BUILDING SETBACK pp ALLOWABLE ENCROACHMENT qC+ , ZONE FOR AWNINGS, ARCADES, COLONNADES, E BALCONIES PROPOSED FLOWERING TREES EXISTING PALMS Ih�4 BASE INFORMATION FOR THIS DOCUMENT IS BASED ON AVAILABLE DATA, WHICH INCLUDES FDOT ROADWAY PLANS, AERIALS, PROPOSED VB41Cua12 AREA SETBACK �F PROPOSED PALMS AND FIELD OBSERVATION. FUTURE PLANS WILL REQUIRE AN UPDATED, SIGNED AND SEALED TOPOGRAPHICAL/ BOUNDARY SURVEY. Scale: 1" = 50' SIDEWALK ZONE SIDEWALK t EXISTING BANYAN TRS OS® LANDSCAPE � TING THE EXACT LOCATIONS OF DRIVEWAYS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE BASED ON THE UPDATED SURVEY, 0' 50 LANDSCAPE AREA PARKING/BLl90UTS) O EXISTING CANOPY TREE • 4--�tt —a PROPOSED ART IN PUBLIC PLACES PROPOSED IRRIGATION ZONE EDGE ZONE (PARALLEL - EXISTING AND PROPOSED DRIVEWAYS Coral Vey Btuaiticarim M aster Plan & D sign Swijdaidb C Jfy cf 03- ^ ^ 4 @2002 Urban RBsource Group - A division of Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. .�10 o000 / H W / -"I .STORI QST y'PO �o AppeNDk F RR ROUNDABOUT LAYOUT F° I I I RESIDENTIA 12 STORIES a GENERAL NOTES 1V THOUGH CURB AND GUTTER WAS CONSIDERED ALONG THE MEDIANS FOR THE ROADS AREA, THE SUBSTANTIAL COST DEEMED THIS OPTION NOT FEASIBLE AS PART OF THIS PROJECT. A POSSIBLE ALTERNATIVE COULD BE A COMBINATION OF CURB AND GUTTER ALONG WITH FLUMES PLACED EVERY 15 FT TO 30 FT. THIS ALTERNATIVE WOULD REQUIRE THAT GRADING OF THE ROADWAY BE DONE AS PART OF THE DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS. 4& BASE INFORMATION FOR THIS DOCUMENT IS BASED ON AVAILABLE DATA, WHICH INCLUDES FDOT ROADWAY PLANS, AERIALS, AND FIELD OBSERVATION. FUTURE PLANS WILL PEOUIRE AN UPDATED, SIGNED AMID SEALED TOPOGRAPHICAL/ BOUNDARY SURVEY. Scale: 1" = 50' THE EXACT LOCATIONS OF DRIVEWAYS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE BASED ON TI -E UPDATED SURVEY. 0' 50' i HAITIAN CONSULATE 2 STORIES L RESIDENTIAL I STORY — —1 — L MW - ° EXTENDED STAY HOTEL 6 STORIES (�) 0�) (�) (�) CORAL WAY (SW 22ND ST.) S� \QST ti1p °�o O e. e e eee� MEDIAN PLANTING O':..j SED CANOPY RIGHT OF WAY TREES ED(ISTING EDGE OF PAVFluSVT ALLOWABLE ENCROACHMENT PROPOSED FLOWERING ® ZONE FOR AWNINGS, ARCADES. TRIS PROPOSED BUILDING SETBACK COLONNADES. E BALCONIES EXISTING PALMS PROPOSED V641OLLAR AREA SETBACK }�' PROPOSED PALMS SIDEWALK ZONE O EXISTING BANYAN TREE • PROPOSED LANDSCAPE LPLIG14TING LANDSCAPE AREA • PROPOSED ART IN EXISTING CANOPY TREEPUBLIC PLACES EDGE ZONE (PARALLELPARKING/EILLBOUTS ..... s PROPOSED IRRIGATION ZONE _ - EXISTING AND PROPOSED DRIVEWAYS - WWjw Co-ra[_Way Beautification /Viaster Man & Design Standards City of /\1i ami © 2002 Urban Resource Group - A division of Kirnley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 0 O t— oo W 03-- 884 8.8.4 SURVEY.- THE EXACT LOCATIONS OF DRIVEWAYS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE BASED ON THE UPDATED SURVEY. 0' Scale: 1" = 50' .�IUCVYAI.R LVI`L LANDSCAPE AREA EDGE ZONE (PARALLH_ PARKINGIBU.BOUTS) OEXISTING CANOPY TREE F'KUYV.76J LI+IWJ'vYlC LPLIGHTING PROPOS® ART IN PLBLIC PLACES PROPOSED IRRIGATION ZONE - EX STING AND PROPOSED DRIVEWAYS Cora[ Way Beautification MasteTP[an & Design Standards J3- —City of M © 2002 Urban Resource Group - A divis iam] ion of Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc. RESIDENTIAL ESIDENTIAL PUBL I X RESIDENTI 3IDENTI�L (98S ✓J CORAL WAY (SW 22ND ST.) �I I PARKING LOT I I � �lc GENERAL NOTES _ <lI THOUGH CURB AND GUTTER WAS CONSIDERED ALONG THE MEDIANS FOR THE ROADS AREA, THE SUBSTANTIAL COST DEEMED THIS OPTION NOT FEASIBLE AS PART OF THIS PROJECT. A POSSIBLE ALTERNATIVE COULD BE A COMBINATION OF CURB AND GUTTER ALONG WITH FLUMES PLACED EVERY 15 FT TO 30 FT. THIS ALTERNATIVE WOULD REOUIRE THAT GRADING OF THE w ROADWAY BE DONE AS PART OF THE DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS. ¢w C = BASE INFORMATION FOR THIS DOCUMENT IS BASED ON AVAILABLE DATA, WHICH INCLUDES FDOT ROADWAY PLANS, AERIALS. c / AND FIELD OBSERVATION. FUTURE PLANS WILL PEOUIRE AN UPDATED, SIGNED AND SEALED TOPOG12APHICAU BOUNDARY SURVEY. THE EXACT LOCATIONS OF DRIVEWAYS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE BASED ON THE UPDATED SURVEY EXISTING METERED PA12KING TO REMAIN 1 Q U3 Q, W 1 1 J N RIGHT OF WAY MEDIAN PLANTING OO PROPS CANOPY TRS$ EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENTp� ALLOWABLE ENCROACHMENT ® PROPOSED FLOWERING PROPOSED BUILDING SETBACK LLJ ZONE FOR AWNINGS. ARCADES TREES COLONNADES, E BALCONIES EXISTING EXISTING PALMS PROPOSED VE341CLLAR AREA SETBACK PROPOSED PALMS SIDEWALK ZONEEXISTING BANYAN TREE PROPOSED LANDSCAPE k Scale: 1" = 50' -- LPLIGHTING LANDSCAPE AREA 0 PROPOSED ART IN 0' 50' EXISTING CANOPY TREE PLBLIC PLACES EDGE ZONE (PARA'IR PARKING/BU.BOLITS) O � i PROP0SED IRRIGATION ZONE r EXISTING AAD PROPOSED DRIVEWAYS Cora[ Way Beautification Master Man & Design Standards City of /Miami © 2002 Urban Resource Group - A division of Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc. t d i 03- 884 Q z 1 W W I)[ (D .■ ! ® ii m .j EXISTING METERED PA12KING TO REMAIN 1 Q U3 Q, W 1 1 J N RIGHT OF WAY MEDIAN PLANTING OO PROPS CANOPY TRS$ EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENTp� ALLOWABLE ENCROACHMENT ® PROPOSED FLOWERING PROPOSED BUILDING SETBACK LLJ ZONE FOR AWNINGS. ARCADES TREES COLONNADES, E BALCONIES EXISTING EXISTING PALMS PROPOSED VE341CLLAR AREA SETBACK PROPOSED PALMS SIDEWALK ZONEEXISTING BANYAN TREE PROPOSED LANDSCAPE k Scale: 1" = 50' -- LPLIGHTING LANDSCAPE AREA 0 PROPOSED ART IN 0' 50' EXISTING CANOPY TREE PLBLIC PLACES EDGE ZONE (PARA'IR PARKING/BU.BOLITS) O � i PROP0SED IRRIGATION ZONE r EXISTING AAD PROPOSED DRIVEWAYS Cora[ Way Beautification Master Man & Design Standards City of /Miami © 2002 Urban Resource Group - A division of Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc. t d i 03- 884 0 ow Plooter Pot Locations: - Center Zone along median noses and major corners Dimensions - 3ft to 6ft diameter x 2ft max height Material Precast concrete - Terracota Installation - Internal (LAG bolt to sidewalk) Other - Refer to plant palette for selection WNW Planter - Locations: Center Zone along land scapeverge - Dimensions - minimum 4 ft x 4 ft planter opening 12 ft to 16 ft overall height 3 at time of planting minimum 6 ft spread - minimum 8 ft clear trunk Other - Recommended understory planting along landscape verge at base of trees. - Accent planting is optional - Refer to plant palette for E—Aselection 03- 884 MIN 2.5FT Planter Pot - Locations: - Center Zone along median noses (behind site triangle), and major corners. - Dimensions 3ft to 5ft diameter x 3.5ft max. height Material Precast concrete Terracota - Installation - Internal (LAG bolt to sidewalk) - Other - Refer to plant palette for selection lo -Ground Planter - Locations: - Throughout at corners of major intersections. - Dimensions - minimum 4 ft x 4 ft planter opening - 16 ft to 20 ft overall height at time of planting - minimum 8 ft "Wood" - Other - Recommended understory planting along landscape verge at base of trees. - Accent planting is optional -Refer to plant palette for selection 3 Plan Locations: Center Zone along major intersecting avenues GENERAL Zone along landscape verge Dimensions minimum 4 ft x 4 ft planter opening - 10 ft to 14 ft overall height at time of planting - minimum 6 ft spread - minimum 6 ft clear trunk Other - Recommended understory planting along landscape verge at base of trees. - Accent planting is optional - Refer to plant palette for selection Corm Way Beautification Master Ptanq Design Standards City of Miami - - © 2002 Urban Resource Group - A division of Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc. Plan View Corner Ramp "A" This type of corner ramp offers a greater area of accessibility for high volumes of pedestrians to cross simultaneously. This type of ramp is recommended for the CENTER Zone. Plan View Corner Ramp "I... This corner ramp works with the curb returning to meet the sidewalk elevation. ADA standards mandate that the areas adjacent to the ramps must be landscaped so as to not allow any wheel chairs to potentially drop down. This creates opportunities to add green to the corners, a characteristic desirable in the GENERAL Zone of the corridor. <11 Cora[ Way Beautification Master Man a Design Standards City of Miami © 2002 Urban Resource Group -A division of Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc. " i 1 Tight Radial flare Currently, large radii exist along Coral Way. It is recommended that the radius for bulb -out corners be reduced to 2.5ft throughout the study area. This detail strengthens both the edge of the pedes- trian area and the vehicular area. Coping Stone Tree Pit liner This urban detail serves the urban context of the corridor in several manners. First, it allows for an open tree pit so the tree can take in more air and water. Second, the coping stone adds 8 inches of flush, walkable space to the sidewalk area, while maintaining an appropriate opening for the tree. Finally, the concrete coping stone can be customized to fit the appropriate motif of any urban corridor and maintain its cost effectiveness. f _D CI { 884 4/ C e s Co' Vwm;c L Nrrti- is --r— 03- 884 Laying Iral soil the nd com- Step 2 - Pouring sidewalk directly over the compacted structural soil. The tree pits is then dug- out for the root ball. One foot Wide Urban Curb In contrast to the standard FDOT "Type -F" curb and gutter which measures 1.5 ft in width for the gut- ter pan and .5 ft for the curb for a total of 2 ft, this detail places greater emphasis on the curb, making it 1 ft wide. This detail like the one to the left, defines the urban edge. Structural Soil Structural soil technology is being utilized in urban streetscapes like Coral Way to enhance the surviv- ability and fertility of urban street trees. In an urban environment where volume for root growth is scarce due to dense compacted soils, the structural soil alternative offers some benefits. The composition of structural soil provides both the air and space that roots need to grow while being sturdy enough to be compacted and used directly under the sidewalk. Cora[ Way Beautification master P[an s� Design Standards City of Miami © 2002 Urban Resource Group - A division o£Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. C" A41 W a" WT14 urge" rl ,no Cara[ Way B City of J\liami 2002 Urban Resource Group - A division ofKimley-Hom and Associates, Inc. eautification Master Man a Design Standards 4$ Z Pendi,�--- 'D' 03- 884 7-1 4-)p ind' Cora[ Wa� Beautification a �; -,)-T,-. �, )� City @ 2002 Urban Resource Group - A division of Kmilcy-Hom and Associates, Inc. .. AM e t Jz- nv� •aaRars�w �� ( f , Coraf_Way Beautification Master Man & Desi City of Miami © 2002 Urban Resource Group - A division of Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc. Standards -, M w E w "M 0 ^� w •� a �s it s o _mss a o • e � w s. oma" •- Ver Wit? 03- 884 Cl Ap 03- 884 Ex Cora[ Way Beautification Master P[an a Design Standards City of Miami @ 2002 Urban Resource Group -A division of Kintley-Horn and Associates, Inc Z w C oral Way Beautification /Master P[an Design Standards City of Miami 2002 Urban Resource Group - A division ofKimley-Hom and Associates, Inc. a I B) -C A %Ppendix IDY 03— 884 Master Man&Design Standards Cora[ Way Beautification City r - of Miami -in) e I LJ J L--- (D 2002 Urban RcSource Group - Adivision ofKimley-Hom and Associates, Inc. 884 Flurniturt', as Art/Fhem.. Reinforc-c-mieOt Coral_ Way Beautification /Master Man a Design Standards City of /Miami 9) 2002 Urban Resource Group -A division of Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc. W 07 W- al t ul L ADp e-ndix/Ef- 03" 884 Community meeting Input - PubliC Meeting April 412002 Current Issues 1) SW 13th St promenade improvements (Cuban Memorial Road) 2) Pre-existing contract for new bus benches (City can reject design however in special districts) 3) Conduits for lights already incorporated – From SW 3711 to SW 12'h on Coral Way werm comments 1) Class II permit required in special overlay districts such as the Latin Quarter 2) When multi -family and/ or buildings are built, adequate parking is not enough 3) Add more than just one parking space per condo unit. Must be a requirement for permit 4) It is unrealistic to expect one car per condo unit or residential 5) Height requirement for Coral Way – legislate a maximum height requirement (perhaps using the tallest existing building as a maximum limit) 6) Keep Coral Way maintenance simple 7) Coral Way and SW 17th Ave and SW 18th Ave are eyesores 8) Use pink sidewalks or other decorative sidewalk treatment to enhance pedestrian space 9) Have a continuous character throughout corridor. This applies to street furniture, sidewalk treatment, building facades, landscape, etc. District t 1) ADA problems occurring on SW 13'h St 2) Increase Handicap parking 3) Add canopy to District 1. Currently there is no canopy 4) Extended stay apartment building is eyesore 5) SW 3 Ave and SW 18th Terrace – Residential Unit (apt. building) – insufficient parking, vandalism due to next door liquor store District 2 1) SW 20 Rd -Additional Driveway requested at Shell Gas station 2) SW 19 Rd and SW 3rd Ave – Obstruction of traffic flow due to cars waiting to turn on intersection 3) SW 18 Terrace and SW 3rd Ave – Cars cross over grass to leave from liquor store New SW 18th Terrace layout took away parking Too much swale 4) SW 31d Ave, between 19 Rd and 18 Terrace -North side – propose angle parking- resulting gain of more parking 5) SW 18 Terrace – Needs major parking increase 6) SW 17 Rd and SW 3 Ave - this area is used as U-turn - No U-turn desired 7) Wider sidewalks and add a bike lane 8) SW 3 Ave – Non -ADA compliant crosswalks at several intersections 9) Typical unmarked parking with gravel - recommend to pave driveways 10) Trash is a problem- people throw trash on streets 11) SW 3 Ave, between SW 28 and SW 27 North side - parking garages at office buildings not being used instead people park on streets 12) SW 3 Ave and SW 31 Rd (North side) – Existing ground floor retail needs on -street parking 13) Raise parking requirement for new development 14) Place development height limitations on new construction 15) Cars being washed on streets – No designated are for car washing of condo tenants 16) SW 3 Ave (South of SW 32 Rd) – Poor bus circulation. Buses forced to U-turn at 31 Rd in order to get on North side of SW 3 Ave 17) SW 3 Ave – between 32 and 31 Rd on North side - proposed school by United Way Residents against development District 3 r— I -std._ __ 03- 884 18) SW 3 Ave and 34" Rd – Do not eliminate parking in this area 19) Coral Way needs to complement the design of SW 1311 Rd Promenade 20) People cross through median in between Banyan trees and are not visible Add landscaping that obstructs pedestrian crossing in these areas 21) New construction at SW 16Ct does not provide enough parking District 4 22) Use St. Charles St (New Orleans) as guide – Bring down the unsightly and hidden streetlights to pedestrian scale 23) Use artist not just for the art pieces on the intersections but as designers of furniture as well. This will result in a continuous character that relates to the Coral Gables effort 24) SW 17 Ave and Coral Way –Major need for parking –Add parking instead of trees. Existing trees are sufficient enough 25) What is the budget for sculptures? Is it independent of the general design budget? Can artists donate pieces to beautify the streetscape and market their work. 26) Crosswalks – use high quality bricks (WOA Gallery) 27) Angle parking spaces will provide more parking 28) Design well decorated meters with a charming style and color 29) Keep news stands in a consistent format and color 30) Coral Way between 17 Ave and 18 Ave (HCP Photography Inc.) – Suggested area parking space has been lost due to parking lot viewing next door 31) Add artistic Sculpture between Banyan trees 32) Coral Way and SW 18 Ave (South side) – Solve Post Office parking problem. 33) Coral Way and SW 24th St SW 24 Terrace, SW 23rd St and SW 23rd Terrace – Conduct Comprehensive Traffic study and limit traffic and parking through neighborhoods. 34) General – Consider barrier designs if Comprehensive Traffic Study results show the necessity. Do not use Miami Shores barrier design solutions 35) General – Employees park in front of residences for their shifts instead of public parking. Enforcement of residential parking permits so community gains and illegal parking is restricted 36) Add bicycle route parallel to Coral Way using a less congested road 37) Not enough parking 38) Create pedestrian friendly promenade 39) Bus bench to match new FPL light poles 40) Use deciduous flowering plants along Coral Way 41) Furniture design to match – Think Paris design 42) Problem: The company providing the new bus benches with illumination at night and advertisements should adhere their design to the overriding master plan furniture design 43) Keep in mind the maintenance effort for the new master plan 44) Decorative traffic signals 45) Coral Way and 22 Ave (South side) – The southeast corner is residential zoning but is illegally used commercial 46) Lack of canopy throughout 47) Can intersection corners have public art as well? 48) Enforcement of residential parking permits so community gains and illegal parking is restricted District 5 49) Incorporate landscape into parking garages 50) 2759 and Coral Way – sidewalk in bad conditions 51) Improve bus way 52) SW 31 Ave and Coral Way – Owner interested in Public/ Private parking garage District D 53) Keep Black Olive trees to maintain shade for parking 54) Also add Art in Public Places to existing blank walls on streets 55) Define districts by flowering trees 56) Use flowering trees as accents 57) Increase canopy options on edges 58) Coral Way and SW 36 Ave – Problem: West bound traffic turning left on 3611 and quick left into Sears – Talk to Commissioner Morales for sketches 59) Coral Way and SW 36 Ave –Add bus stop just west of corner Co -rat Way Beautification Master Plan k Design Standards ME C�ity of Miami © 2002 Urban Resource Gioup - A division of Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. r Alternative Intersection Designs The following alternative intersection designs were done by other consultants and are not part of this study. However, these designs need to be taken into consideration when performing a comprehensive plan for the corridor. 11 EMisting intersection condSian at SW 12111 Ave, SW 3rd Ave, and SW 22nd St 2 131 Intersection of SW 12th Ave, SW 3rd Ave, and SW 221d St ("5 points Intersection"I Design done by others 41 Proposed Intersection Layout of SW 13th St and SW 3rd Ave Design done by others H AW,, N.T.S. s■n>dnorEr MIAMI CHILDREN'S MUSEUMFigure Existing "Five Point" Intersection Geometry 5 : `roposed Traffic Circle arm NS a N.T.S. 21 7CORR�dDINg 31 MIAMI CHILDREN'S MUSEUM Figure Proposed Geometry a1 the "Five Point" Intersection 6 qjw� Cora[ Way Beautification Master Man a Design Standards City of Miami © 2002 Urban Resource Group -A division of Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc. r 41 sr, _�`.t_ -�i �:' ;-�t_ �"311 ?Y•, �;���� // 03— 884