Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
R-03-0879
J-03-602 6/27/03 RESOLUTION NO. 0 3 " 8 ( 9 A RESOLUTION OF THE MIAMI CITY COMMISSION, WITH ATTACHMENTS, APPROVING WITH CONDITIONS, A MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT PURSUANT TO ARTICLES 13 AND 17 OF ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 11000, FOR THE METROPOLIS PROJECT, TO BE LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY 1852 AND 1900 NORTH BAYSHORE DRIVE, MIAMI, FLORIDA, TO BE COMPRISED OF A MIXED- USE/RESIDENTIAL BUILDING WITH UP TO 752 UNITS, 8,470 SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL USE; RECREATIONAL AMENITIES AND 845 PARKING SPACES; DIRECTING TRANSMITTAL; MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATING CONCLUSIONS OF LAW; PROVIDING FOR BINDING EFFECT; CONTAINING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, on May 6, 2003, Lucia A. Dougherty on behalf of Terra-Adi International, LLC., (referred to as "APPLICANT"), submitted a complete Application for Major Use Special Permit for the Metropolis Project (referred to as "PROJECT") pursuant to Articles 13 and 17 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, for the property located at approximately 1852 and 1900 North Bayshore Drive, Miami, Florida, as legally described in "Exhibit B", attached and incorporated; and WHEREAS, development of the PROJECT requires the issuance of a Major Use Special Permit pursuant to Article 17 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Flo: r BION CITY CO.,IIS N EiT :�3G OF J U L r 4 2003 Resolui .oa No. 03- 8'79 WHEREAS, the Large Scale Development Committee met on February 25, 2003, to consider the proposed PROJECT and offer its input; and WHEREAS, the Urban Development Review Board (DDRB) met on March 19, 2003, to consider the proposed PROJECT and recommended approval with the two (2) conditions recommended by staff regarding articulation of FEMA wall and landscaping (as depicted in the attached Development Order); and WHEREAS, the APPLICANT has modified the proposed PROJECT to address the expressed technical concerns raised at said Large Scale Development Committee meeting and the design concerns of the UDRB. WHEREAS, the Miami Planning Advisory Board, at its meeting held on June 18, 2003, Item No. 2, following an advertised public hearing, adopted Resolution No. PAB 38-03 by a vote of nine to zero (9-0), RECOMMENDING APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS of the Major Use Special Permit Development Order as attached and incorporated; and WHEREAS, the City Commission deems it advisable and in the best interest of the general welfare of the City of Miami to issue a Major Use Special Permit Development Order as hereinafter set forth; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA: Page 2 of 8 03— 879 Section 1. The recitals and findings contained in the Preamble to this Resolution are adopted by reference and incorporated as if fully set forth in this Section. Section 2. A Major Use Special Permit Development Order, attached and incorporated as "Exhibit A," is approved, subject to the conditions specified in the Development Order, per Article 17 of Ordinance No. 11000, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended, for the PROJECT to be developed by the APPLICANT, at approximately 1852 and 1900 North Bayshore Drive, Miami, Florida, more particularly described in "Exhibit B," attached and incorporated. Section 3. The PROJECT is approved for the construction of a mixed-use/residential building with up to 752 units, 8,470 square feet of commercial use; recreational amenities and 845 parking spaces. Section 4. The Major Use Special Permit Application for the PROJECT also encompasses the lower ranking Special Permits as set forth in the Development Order ("Exhibit A"). Section 5. The findings of fact set forth below are made with respect to the subject PROJECT: a. The PROJECT is in conformity with the adopted Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000, as amended. Page 3 of 8 � J 3 879 b. The PROJECT is in accord with the SD -6 Zoning classification of Ordinance No. 11000, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended. C. Pursuant to Section 1305 of Ordinance No. 11000, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, the specific site plan aspects of the PROJECT, i.e., ingress and egress, parking, signs and lighting, utilities, drainage, preservation of natural features and control of potentially adverse effects generally, have been considered and will be further considered administratively during the process of issuing a building permit and a certificate of occupancy. d. The PROJECT is expected to cost approximately $290 million, and to employ approximately 145 workers during construction (FTE -Full Time Employees); the PROJECT will also result in the creation of approximately 20 permanent new jobs. The PROJECT will generate approximately $4.5 million annually in tax revenues to local units of government (2002 dollars) . e. The City Commission further finds that: (1) the PROJECT will have a favorable impact on the economy of the City; Page 4 of 8 03- 879 (2) the PROJECT will efficiently use public transportation facilities; (3) any potentially adverse effects of the PROJECT will be mitigated through compliance with the conditions of this Major Use Special Permit; (4) the PROJECT will favorably affect the need for people to find adequate housing reasonably accessible to their places of employment; (5) the PROJECT will efficiently use necessary public facilities; (6) the PROJECT will not negatively impact the environment and natural resources of the City; (7) the PROJECT will not adversely affect living conditions in the neighborhood; (8) the PROJECT will not adversely affect public safety; (9) based on the record presented and evidence presented, the public welfare will be served by the PROJECT; and (10) any potentially adverse effects of the PROJECT arising from safety and security, fire protection and life safety, solid waste, Page 5 of 8 03— 879 heritage conservation, trees, shoreline development, minority participation and employment, and minority contractor/ subcontractor participation will be mitigated through compliance with the conditions of this Major Use Special Permit. Section 6. The Major Use Special Permit, as approved and amended, shall be binding upon the APPLICANT and any successors in interest. Section 7. The application for Major Use Special Permit, which was submitted on May 6, 2003, and is on file with the Department of Planning and Zoning of the City of Miami, Florida, shall be relied upon generally for administrative interpretations and is incorporated by reference. Section 8. The City Manager is directed to instruct the Director of the Department of Planning and Zoning to transmit a copy of this Resolution and attachment to the APPLICANT. Section 9. The Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law are made with respect to the PROJECT as described in the Development Order ("Exhibit A") for the PROJECT, attached and incorporated. Section 10. The Major Use Special Permit Development Order for the PROJECT ("Exhibit A") is granted and issued. Page 6 of 8 o3— 3— 87e Section 11. In the event that any portion or section of this Resolution or the Development Order ("Exhibit A") is determined to be invalid, illegal, or unconstitutional by a court or agency of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall in no manner affect the remaining portions of this Resolution or Development Order ("Exhibit A") which shall remain in full force and effect. Section 12. The provisions approved for this Major Use Special Permit, as approved, shall commence and become operative thirty (30) days after the adoption of the Resolution. Section 13. This Major Use Special Permit, as approved, shall expire two (2) years from its commencement and operative date. Section 14. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its adoption and signature of the Mayor.'/ 1� If the Mayor does not sign this Resolution, it shall become effective at the end of ten calendar days from the date it was passed and adopted. If the Mayor vetoes this Resolution, it shall become effective immediately upon override of the veto by the City Commission. Page 7 of 8 .Q - 879 PASSED AND ADOPTED this 24th day of July , 2003. ATTEST- PRISCILLA A. THOMP ON CITY CLERK APPROVED"AS TO JAEJ RO VILARELLO IT ATTORNEY 360:GKW:et so 0)/a r*t 4 4-0, MANU A. DIAZ, MAYOR CORRECTNESS: Page 8 of 8 03- 879 "EXHIBIT A" ATTACHMENT TO RESOLUTION NO. DATE: THE METROPOLIS PROJECT MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT DEVELOPMENT ORDER Let it be known that pursuant to Articles 13 and 17 of Ordinance No. 11000, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended (the "Zoning Ordinance"), the Commission of the City of Miami, Florida, has considered in a public hearing the issuance of a Major Use Special Permit for the Metropolis Project (hereinafter referred to as the "PROJECT") to be located at approximately 1852 and 1900 North Bayshore Drive, Miami, Florida (see legal description in "Exhibit B", attached and incorporated), subject to any dedications, limitations, restrictions, reservations or easements of record. After due consideration of the recommendations of the Planning Advisory Board and after due consideration of the consistency of this proposed development with the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan, the City Commission has approved the PROJECT, and subject to the following conditions approves the Major Use Special Permit and issues this Permit: 03- 879 FINDINGS OF FACT PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The proposed PROJECT is a residential/mixed-use development to be located at approximately 1852 and 1900 North Bayshore Drive, Miami, Florida. The PROJECT is located on a gross lot area of approximately 116,184 square feet and a net lot area of approximately 65,595 square feet of land (more particularly described in "Exhibit B", incorporated by reference). The remainder of the PROJECT's Data Sheet is attached and incorporated as "Exhibit C". The proposed PROJECT will be comprised of a mixed- use/residential building with up to 752 units, 8,470 square feet of commercial use; recreational amenities and 845 parking spaces. The Major Use Special Permit Application for the PROJECT also encompasses the following lower ranking Special Permits: CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 906.6, to permit recreation facilities; CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Section 915.2 for FAA clearance letter; CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 925.3.8, to allow development/construction signage; CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 918.2 for parking and staging of construction during construction; Page A-2 of 7 03— 879 CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, for construction fence and construction trailer with watchman's quarters; CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT for valet parking for residential and other uses; CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, for reduction of loading berth size. CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 6, Section 606 for new construction in the SD -6 District. CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 6, Section 606 for temporary construction fence within the SD -6 District. REQUEST that the following MUSP conditions be required at the time of shell permit instead of at issuance of foundation permit: a. the requirement to provide a letter of assurance for the Solid Waste Department; and b. the requirement to record in the Public Records a unity of title or covenant in lieu of unity of title. Pursuant to Articles 13 and 17 of the Zoning Ordinance, approval of the requested Major Use Special Permit shall be considered sufficient for the subordinate permits requested and referenced above as well as any other special approvals required by the City which may be required to carry out the requested plans. The PROJECT shall be constructed substantially in accordance with plans and design schematics on file prepared by Nichols, Page A-3 of 7 ;j3— 879 Brosch, Sandoval & Associates, Inc. dated April 30, 2003; the landscape plan shall be implemented substantially in accordance with plans and design schematics on file prepared by Fuster Design Associates, P.A., dated April 2003; said design and landscape plans may be permitted to be modified only to the extent necessary to comply with the conditions for approval imposed; all modifications shall be subject to the review and approval of the Director of the Department of Planning and Zoning prior to the issuance of any building permits. The PROJECT conforms to the requirements of the SD -6 Zoning District, as contained in the Zoning Ordinance, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended. The existing comprehensive plan future land use designation on the subject property allows the proposed uses. CONDITIONS THE APPLICANT, ITS SUCCESSORS, AND/OR ASSIGNS, JOINTLY OR SEVERALLY, PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF ANY BUILDING PERMITS, SHALL COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING: 1. Meet all applicable building codes, land development regulations, ordinances and other laws and pay all fees due prior to the issuance of a building permit. 2. Allow the Miami Police Department to conduct a security survey, at the option of the Department, and to make recommendations concerning security measures and systems; further submit a report to the Department of Planning and Zoning, prior to commencement of construction, demonstrating Page A-4 of 7 %!3- 879 how the Police Department recommendations, if any, have been incorporated into the PROJECT security and construction plans, or demonstrate to the Director of the Department of Planning and Zoning why such recommendations are impractical. 3. Obtain approval from, or provide a letter from the Department of Fire -Rescue indicating APPLICANT'S coordination with members of the Fire Plan Review Section at the Department of Fire -Rescue in the review of the scope of the PROJECT, owner responsibility, building development process and review procedures, as well as specific requirements for fire protection and life safety systems, exiting, vehicular access and water supply. 4. Obtain approval from, or provide a letter of assurance from the Department of Solid Waste that the PROJECT has addressed all concerns of the said Department prior to the obtainment of a shell permit. S. Comply with the Minority Participation and Employment Plan (including a Contractor/subcontractor Participation Plan) submitted to the City as part of the Application for Development Approval, with the understanding that the APPLICANT must use its best efforts to follow the provisions of the City's Minority/Women Business Affairs and Procurement Program as a guide. 6. Prior to the issuance of a shell permit, provide the City with an executed, recordable unity of title or covenant in - lieu of unity of title agreement for the subject property; said agreement shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Attorney's Office. 7. Provide the Department of Planning and Zoning with a temporary construction plan that includes the following: a temporary construction parking plan, with an enforcement policy; a construction noise management plan with an Page A-5 of 7 ��3- 879 enforcement policy; and a maintenance plan for the temporary construction site; said plan shall be subject to the review and approval by the Department of Planning and Zoning prior to the issuance of any building permits and shall be enforced during construction activity. All construction activity shall remain in full compliance with the provisions of the submitted construction plan; failure to comply may lead to a suspension or revocation of this Major Use Special Permit. 8. The APPLICANT shall modify the plans on file in order to: a) ensure that the hedge is cultivated to cover the exposed blank walls in their entirety; and b) the FEMA wall shall be articulated to add interest for passing pedestrians. THE CITY SHALL: Establish the operative date of this Permit as being thirty (30) days from the date of its issuance; the issuance date shall constitute the commencement of the thirty (30) day period to appeal from the provisions of the Permit. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW The PROJECT, proposed by the APPLICANT, complies with the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000, is consistent with the orderly development and goals of the City of Miami, and complies with local land development regulations and further, pursuant to Section 1703 of the Zoning Ordinance: (1) the PROJECT will have a favorable impact on the economy of the City; and Page A-6 of 7 03- 879 (2) the PROJECT will efficiently use public transportation facilities; and (3) the PROJECT will favorably affect the need for people to find adequate housing reasonably accessible to their places of employment; and (4) the PROJECT will efficiently use necessary public facilities; and (5) the PROJECT will not negatively impact the environment and natural resources of the City; and (6) the PROJECT will not adversely affect public safety; and (7) the public welfare will be served by the PROJECT; and (8) any potentially adverse effects of the PROJECT will be mitigated through conditions of this Major Use Special Permit. The proposed development does not unreasonably interfere with the achievement of the objectives of the adopted State Land Development Plan applicable to the City of Miami. Pursuant to Section 1305 of the Zoning Ordinance, the specific site plan aspects of the PROJECT i.e., ingress and egress, offstreet parking and loading, refuse and service areas, signs and lighting, utilities, drainage and control of potentially adverse effects generally have been considered and will be further considered administratively during the process of issuing individual building permits and certificates of occupancy. Page A-7 of 7 i,;3- 879 EXHIBIT "B" Legal Description: Lots 1, 4 and 5 in Block 7 of MIRAMAR THIRD AMENDED SUBDIVISION, according to the Plat thereof as Recorded in Plat Book 5 at Page 4 of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida. 03- 879 a Y ■ MAL DESCRIP710N ux 1. Lut 4. *W Lu 5 of Uurw. Addil:r 19 t>twc Piet Ha* S, NON4tENDERTL4L ■ 47P4R4 wm 7 FLOOR AREA RATA Pop 4 of t*Mk MM& L1arr601116 Cow01l. FL / ACTUAL RECREA110N AREA NWRESIDENTIAL Ralawant 3,408 S,. FLOWAREA KKI16 REQUIREMEM ■ PROPERTY AREA 110.164 egwe let (01oa1) 2 Aauleit4oa41eeidalttdF.AR.: OW P.470-l-s.wq / TOTAL 15 WS egln Nal ;lso ALLOWABLE FAA. AND ■ OPEN SPACE / PROPERTY MONNG SDA • willf Collraeld0 Raaf All DWh p1 i aai AftMINmAwNnial FA.R.: 0,07 / ALLOWABLE RESIDENTIAL F'ba so b so MMW" wee shall r4i •1104411 ALLOWABLE DENSITY 507 Unto per Axa FLOOR AREA RATIO 72016s OssoMbtarea, NUMBER OF UNRS r PARKNO PROVISIONS ■ SETBACKS 720 a 111,114 •U6,5E/.6 SF YAlt01, REOURPA C tt W&i r a6U100 property One ■ AMIAL•RWORILT(AL EWTaw. Law. 573.1421E FLOOR AREA RATIO W611TOW. Lw 30t111)se LOIAYAt@14; 2.213 9• TAWFAJLArov 190321 AcM 6adde1 M FAR.: 730 pie W • 1r.114i ■ ALLOWABLE Fina arts b d naramdemlial was shay rpt NNW NON4tENDERTL4L 12 tkneli ewmilsteree. FLOOR AREA RATA 12 A t114,1114 a 130,420 SF / ACTUAL 0mm 2,935 V NWRESIDENTIAL Ralawant 3,408 S,. FLOWAREA KKI16 ROOS 7.340 5 Tort A1we1) R, FAA tec 6,410 w 2 Aauleit4oa41eeidalttdF.AR.: OW P.470-l-s.wq / TOTAL 'The kda(00or ane kr al buldhp on in ir4AAw lot ALLOWABLE FAA. AND 1011 not eaoead 1.4 Wm Is 110111 u em.' ACTUAL FAA Aduel Reeldall0 FAA: 730 p1 i aai AftMINmAwNnial FA.R.: 0,07 0714,041 Told Mull FAR 717 ALLOWABLE DENSITY 507 Unto per Axa Per 1.500 Adores t 600 UMalkon • 753 Urns Atwell NUMBER OF UNRS 752 Tout (446 Phase 1; 304 Phase 7! ■ SETBACKS 9atBOOM Dtiwmit WitaW411Awnue' YAlt01, REOURPA C tt W&i r a6U100 property One SETBACKS I S Y Saylllola Q w YARDS PROVIDED T a Nuvwul 4th westLa11 30 Brdey Nes; Tow 253 C at Interior abu11 n01he EXHIBIT 64C" '0119 qWn led d open epee Or Wiese racletataa epees 9" be peided tdr1"10sipmlast dl mm"Nooraras' 1PAl:cT1 ""lied: SM SF (13es34SFka-' 1 RegWW Awn>ble Par7.3q $PDM PM+tidad E�113 SF PARKNO SPACES 9.136 ErMliot-1wW 100.700 17 4,230 Roof Top Gordon -L" 4100 R" ed AWOUNG Var• PSMM SpaOea 64.750 RawalonN Spew 6 Pool PAM Lr o00.1000 A1we1) fadwSWp utlts Ire at:1l be r n**otm of ors perLlp 1pa01 end a 2 aladneaa«twleprl0as.' . P7o4dW A04ae1Ete P&1ft Span 'For Iwiswu+le, Ewe, as per 100 SF rot paron arae" PARKIIO SPACES 3,131 � 100.39 apecee 3 TorRMel1111 Ssift Ira. a rtlimli m «one W*MO SP«0rote1o0r• p1 i aai x11andaInlaI doapw300SF1 0714,041 7,100+ 1000.31Pe0ee 7MOWS— 'forkokdw rd pvbwhW 1140• we. sriYi i m dors palm epa Per 100 SF' tY►1Ch tAt�ila $370 N1V wD01 2,335 *000.3 epeces 1C1tsa7100 tFtllt ]100 PrMnQrprovimlorrl: Hesse $PAM (awr,Auowwe East Lob 54 54 EmsILA 311 371 EaalT4nwri PN 15 1S westLa11 30 30 Nes; Tow 253 263 Waf Toar / PH 12 t2 Tod RgErNtl Spaces: 762 752 Raaf rld (tuft Spow S Clbe: 3 RaatauaMlipaae 30 Ouast 8aroae. 41 Taw krluft Pavilim to twols) /4S Total Ro**od Parkial (A5 Levels) 711 �3- 879 'k�}f{{.}:n:•'}'`f.:v{:i:.>.. }•.x7..,:.0 1PAl:cT1 / REQi1RED ACCESSIBLE RegWW Awn>ble Par7.3q $PDM 2% d loll PARKNO SPACES 2% of $45 • 17 .ar6rmeenee <<:i.;. •{.:; .a.,• ;,.:lis � .y;'?aSi<:[%:;P!i'i::iA:%is71!::R`.:Jif)�r?:::.:C•:.;:�S�.i... ?•.: }.a: Rt^.: Tf,�.' .... • R" ed AWOUNG Var• PSMM SpaOea t iy awry 0 A1we1) tr+1• 2 ■ FROM ACCESSIBLE P7o4dW A04ae1Ete P&1ft Span .7 PARKIIO SPACES Prodded Aotaeiae Van Parting Spam 3 �3- 879 'k�}f{{.}:n:•'}'`f.:v{:i:.>.. }•.x7..,:.0 55:42 ;M.r�+a la1Bi 3c0 141100 tarwwatetil }'i:.z:}•::}.,}},: .. ;:. ::..� a:>k?`::i: •,;.:: •,.Y':•::�f'i:i � •:! .: 4::lF::•>;.?:%514::::{1',#n:: �0: i`vilfi.v:•.� •: n!�:;;v:�. n.. n:.. >f:. U1T1A 7111 aslJ AOM1 .ar6rmeenee <<:i.;. •{.:; .a.,• ;,.:lis � .y;'?aSi<:[%:;P!i'i::iA:%is71!::R`.:Jif)�r?:::.:C•:.;:�S�.i... ?•.: }.a: Rt^.: Tf,�.' .... • R71.151t W. W 6111 1,117 let all 1tt Wu ale U21 A1we1) w• 11111711,10 "1 i0 !0/'4ewJUlil llKi N1t ! rasa Fi Y1A11110r4t 10'11 1 t tYvrA:telsa/mr.4v 111 :::h,�..:R;k:;a:::>T.!!.{{>'R^';:N....J!:r>'.';}17E�#::::::�>•;:`:,: Itvat+oo»eu»oo 1 •rA{•;: �.isAS`�:::Re'•:o�ei!%�5{:il�"Eii,�.i.''•<';::.:i;':%;%A:;a .,...{.....:.,... p1 i aai OF. 1,341 794 w 773 471 1.1>i tas 01 119 :111 1,311 0714,041 IF. 01 IAN M 004 Al 1711 947 694 131 $11 7MOWS— Fords wom TNF! >Y 7alreaw1611R7 tY►1Ch tAt�ila $370 N1V wD01 :.'•�: +•.+i!^••N<'+ �:'i3{}:� z'�r: •.f::::.>f`:•.{•�•:.:.�:�::::;,1,'::.:..:...r...::::7K:.....,::�'...:..::>.;-::.:>:::. 1C1tsa7100 tFtllt ]100 ..G.;"��°:�•`.t,:f.,�;:p'%�-�:.✓.•.a.•.t(.r `,..:..s:::.:..<.... .•::.akar....... ..•.Yb :: 1740511 aF. 1,194 — 0 A3 e1 MAI las 04 B 1.21e 1361 94511011 !:, IA47 1111 141 101 461 7A 173 — 1.410 10ataw0e tows . 1Y/a'A: taWU4t00TiW 460 r�A{•ti :41•.41. }••�"^ }..�.. •:;::�.,�... H4' 11.t: 4'': Y�:• 4151'+.` .C. � S' >�w:y(�'j'•:2.::Y.}{;:;`.4' r}.TAA:�LC�`.Cii S•:vvw•7%.•.v::L::.•av:.vx `I,�N '•• . OU•511 Or. Un — a7e I.1n, /M 04 110 72111 Ij94 .... FeMD1a1 LAM14.0403711 944111 .KNMWYWOIt rose$ _ in•:.Y •:H •�:.•:r.,y{ i%r{r '• :; } 'r'd: •: ,.1w 41..4,ae'� :{+.y)�4 ;��py'Sba YS:.�{,� ' >'•; .•i• Sr.' �'iw`X:::: t':i:.'5.}n4Y.,•:•.iw ;vi:9."•; !`A"� 4:•F••w�� J'.'.i.'•:w.�w�.'•:. I Pd11110wa1lKte 710 0 146140110 M1IN01Ma MQ1L rms• /�) WY.gK •„ (r/. .v>.�n}vn� KfYv'M V•: 4 ••'11'946 :i:� e�ey1�<y:;< •`ryF..�y�� /y pi .. �y+ row. •• wS.n•'.::v,,�.i'lT�.+�::,!w.iZ::S.•fw.9:•�.�vKvCwM:} 4lrwan •rry:K„':..:..•L:.�3. .ars as I,If1' un 1.114 +,711 1101 pelw) ah IL We UM IJ71 M:..:... • { . }... :5}:`{ ,{:!2: �:.•�;.:., {,nf:.sq:. y'{a::}>:. i,. •..<,•:}::a.>::.:}: `55;{'4;4•+ ,. � {.%Y+ 'r .� r.v .:•:a ti:•::.5{;:•::}:o-::>`}L.q`•i;' '•:�y fi{:;i ';••i;}i:•.a•:{b3'•{:v`: K{, s :: >::•,::' ::•ii0li:k•: 11:x'.. <a». ✓:. •` a r. nG:4 1405: `t .:�:• ,+;. ': v:n:}•::::%.•S: 1•�:•F::..y66�� .'3w:'r',. ` yiT:•:L• +SOC{...':wn•1.;:.: i�: :P••?. :/{Y{.S �3- 879 PLANNING FACT SHEET APPLICANT HEARING DATE REQUESTILOCATION LEGAL DESCRIPTION PETITION PLANNING RECOMMENDATION BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD CITY COMMISSION APPLICATION NUMBER ITEM PZ 1 Lucia A. Dougherty, Esquire on behalf of Tema -Atli International, LLC. June 18, 2003 Major Use Special Permit for the Metropolis Project Located at Approximately 1852 and 1900 North Bayshore Drive. Complete legal description on file at the Department of Hearing Boards. Consideration of approving with conditions, a Major Use Special Permit pursuant to Articles 13 and 17 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, as amended, for the Metropolis Project, to be located at approximately 1852 and 1900 North Bayshore Drive, to be comprised of a mixed- usetresidential building with up to 752 units, 8,470 square feet of commercial use; recreational amenities and 845 parking spaces. Approval with conditions. See supporting documentation. Recommended approval with VOTE: 9-0 conditions to City Commission. N/A. 2003-025 Item #2 CITY OF MIAMI • PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT 444 SW 2ND AVENUE, 3RD FLOOR • MIAMI, FLORIDA, 33130 PHONE (305) 416-1400 Date: 7/15/2003 Page 1 pJ3- 879 Analysis for Major Use Special Permit for the Metropolis Project located at approximately 1852 and 1900 North Bayshore Drive CASE NO. 2003-0025 Pursuant to Ordinance 11000, as amended, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, the subject proposal for the Metropolis Project has been reviewed to allow a Major Use Special Permit per Article 17 for a mixed-use/residential building with up to 752 units, 8,470 square feet of commercial use; recreational amenities and 845 parking spaces. This Permit also includes the following requests: CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 906.6, to permit recreation facilities; CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Section 915.2 for FAA clearance letter; CLASS I SPECIAL 'PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 925.3.8, to allow development/construction signage; CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 918.2 for parking and staging of construction during construction; CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, for construction fence and construction trailer with watchman's quarters; CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT for valet parking for residential and other uses; CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, for reduction of loading berth size. CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 6, Section 606 for new construction in the SD -6 District. CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 6, Section 606 for temporary construction fence within the SD -6 District. REQUEST that the following MUSP conditions be required at the time of shell permit instead of at issuance of foundation permit: a. the requirement to provide a letter of assurance for the Solid Waste Department; and b. the requirement to record in the Public Records a unity of title or covenant in lieu of unity of title. Pursuant to Articles 13 and 17 of Zoning Ordinance 11000, approval of the requested Major Use Special Permit shall be considered sufficient for the subordinate permits requested and referenced above as well as any other special approvals required by the City which may be required to carry out the requested plans. 03—'879 In determining the appropriateness of the proposed project, the Planning and Zoning Department has referred this project to the Large Scale Development Committee (LSDC) and the Urban Development Review Board (DDRB) for additional input and recommendations; the following findings have been made: • It is found that the proposed development project will benefit the area by creating new housing opportunities in the Omni/Edgewater Area with ground floor commercial uses fronting on North Bayshore Drive. • It is found that the subject property is located across from the newly renovated Margaret Pace Park that makes it ideal for creating new in -town housing to serve the downtown area. • It is found that the project has convenient access to the Omni Area People Mover for efficient use of existing mass transit systems. • It is found that the project was reviewed by the Large Scale Development Committee and has been modified to address the expressed technical concerns raised at said Large Scale Developmer Committee meeting; • It is found that the proposed project was reviewed for design appropriateness by the Urban Development Review Board and the Planning and Zoning Department; the staff review resulted in design modifications which were then recommended for approval to the Planning and Zoning Director. • It is found that with respect to all additional criteria as specified in Section 1305 of Zoning Ordinance 11000, the proposal has been reviewed and found to be adequate. Based on these findings, the Planning and Zoning Department is recommending approval of the requested Development Project with the following conditions: 1. Meet all applicable building codes, land development regulations, ordinances and other laws and pay all applicable fees due prior to the issuance of a building permit. 2. Allow the Miami Police Department to conduct a security survey, at the option of the Department, and to make recommendations concerning security measures and systems; further submit a report to the Department of Planning and Zoning, prior to commencement of construction, demonstrating how the Police Department recommendations, if any, have been incorporated into the PROJECT security and construction plans, or demonstrate to the Director of the Department of Planning and Zoning why such recommendations are impractical. 3. Obtain approval from, or provide a letter from the Department of Fire -Rescue indicating APPLICANT'S coordination with members of the Fire Plan Review 0J3- 879 Section at the Department of Fire -Rescue in the review of the scope of the PROJECT, owner responsibility, building development process and review procedures, as well as specific requirements for fire protection and life safety systems, exiting, vehicular access and water supply. 4. Obtain approval from, or provide a letter of assurance from the Department of Solid Waste that the PROJECT has addressed all concerns of the said Department prior to the obtainment of a shell permit. 5. Comply with the Minority Participation and Employment Plan (including a Contractor/Subcontractor Participation Plan) submitted to the City as part of the Application for Development Approval, with the understanding that the APPLICANT must use its best efforts to follow the provisions of the City's Minority/Women Business Affairs and Procurement Program as a guide. 6. Prior to the issuance of a shell permit, provide the City with an executed, recordable unity of title or covenant in -lieu of unity of title agreement for the subject property; said agreement shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Attorney's Office± 7. Provide the Department of Planning and Zoning with a temporary construction plan that includes the following: a temporary construction parking plan, with an enforcement policy; a construction noise management plan with an enforcement policy; and a maintenance plan for the temporary construction site; said plan shall be subject to the review and approval by the Department of Planning and Zoning prior to the issuance of any building permits and shall be enforced during construction activity. All construction activity shall remain in full compliance with the provisions of the submitted construction plan; failure to comply may lead to a suspension or revocation of this Major Use Special Permit. 8. The APPLICANT shall modify the plans on file in order to: a) ensure that the hedge is cultivated to cover the exposed blank walls in their entirety; and b) the FEMA wall shall be articulated to add interest for passing pedestrians. �- 879 . ,.N • 13 ! — . e s ' . a 8 s s s— a N t ! • 7 H l] 17 a •y ! Ar • ! 2 1 ' 9 ♦ : uism]W • 9 4 . 3 O 3 ,a 4 / , s s Q to y s z r as is i11 2s s, II 2� n •• • ' fi U1 .. .. . I _ .. e' 1 � 2 u x - N u n 2 I �• x / • 1. t 3 • 3 • r•• I J = M sr •e w S, sr a a f SHORE ! Q1, a• Is r. u Ii. �j s s x•t IV,E I S 23 T - u• ufn Ia w uw N n4�i _¢ _u 12 ,F _. , • s ♦ ._c' .r UH pNuC TERRANOVA 4 5. BISCAYNE TRACT *A; 7E • + a Y a sz. R� • It ••s .1 J •a••• i o s T s s•] g' V j c' n N- •a IMZ 3' 9 : ee a o• Ie a r � n a 1 z2T. N.E. 22• fulo apas pRE ST. ��� �� � .. Is c] 12 u 9 r• s♦ S 1 ' • to !• h 9 !• I e r X" y t ltax J1 • 2 yWt 1•� 1 1141 f °S • I N T RA O PARCEL r 1 21 P S'1• ' N.E. li fill 21 Is M 11 10 f r i S 174 ' t. .° w ,O . \ N 3 , er . 1 ca • • p ✓..- ....� _ �.. r r ui r' > ' Ir TR.*e la Z IS 1 O 1 • 1 i i • ] 2 1 b to , • , • 5 2 q • • } ! • S 1 ' . - - ' - N •• N 10• ' NE F 2C miiiiiiiiitTER. Iw TRV is 14 is ( I m 7 6! 12 1 I 10 �. S♦]] a • • 1 p 1 i �D� 77.I:,a ..... C O - `, �sr- x]- •n 9 17F 1\ ss A 7 ] !1 . \ 1 i 1 U ME . 6 IFA N •I %� .._,_ A.. r � ��� vIR'AMARF S Is _1E�1E►Tc11 f•..f : t S• :. 3 , • . 2 x 1 _ • - I y q H�c - - --- ST N T. I S T. r -i 4. 12` 1' 1 ' uL_1Ct�J1_ :•• �� '�' FSA R K •.,�0 6 eUs.(FA VJor ^.•Pui . � S D6 TY CEMETERY j "k is S 4 3 d' •• S Q !' a a r Mt } g a • p {. QShl1�]u • 9 i liI t t W �•. II 4M aW17 Q O j�•'•^ R. a, 2e cT D r . A i ( 111 t ," J ~ TRACT W' ;> > p Atlafor• 5 gJe �!� CL `e OMNI ANNEX Ems+ 47- Q 11� P �1� p q 0 12 13 ' 17 ST. a P M +r. -- it � .• v IA A C ' h. E. .� t 7 • < s 8 •:.a .1e 0 Irk 9 •' V 17 • n( •a aw•, ac TRACT l( t - C O' Y 14 IS N T IIT 1 .• . _ Clr11rR 16 g Ran *• °s `� ST. a• _ \ �I s a . :! ri T0 T P • . 8 . 1 LAZA � m • s — = � •� r . T 'C c 10 • q s ' •sr • 1 TRACT A ff • 11 a • 11 LL � 1', w : 1 S T. N.E.15 ; •e r r R [ rl • R e+\we 1� s w • S g E ' A. S. C > • . 1 Iw o4 Tl� t r _ 17 W r tai -Is :u,w C•N E�. .� � �Nx�~ ae * = Z a.•.w a �. r..• Z Ins w N a• w : t3 /` su(rc HERALD PARK (� Z I „. s".•• .•• Iw - .f•.w y ERSN`N •s 7' m t 1 Ist� .Q': - TR lA! I' , N_ E. m" YRQR tot •E• 4 'S T.. °ed000000000 ' e r ., - N E 144 •era+.sm•m.,. .. ��� RESOLUTION PAB - 38-03 A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS AS SPECIFIED BY STAFF, OF A RESOLUTION, APPROVING, A MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT PURSUANT TO ARTICLES 13 AND 17 OF ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 11000, AS AMENDED, FOR THE METROPOLIS PROJECT, TO BE LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY 1852-1900 NORTH BAYSHORE DRIVE, MIAMI, FLORIDA, TO BE COMPRISED OF A MIXED-USE/RESIDENTIAL BUILDING WITH UP TO 752 UNITS, 8,470 SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL USE, RECREATIONAL AMENITIES AND 845 PARKING SPACES. HEARING DATE: June 18, 2003 ITEM NO.: 2 VOTE: 9-0 ATTEST - Gelabert-Sanchez, Dir Planning and Zoning Department 03- 879 M[WH I B fl V B I fi Lucia A. Dougherty (305) 579-0603 E -Mail: doughertyl@gtlaw.com May 6, 2003 Ms. Teresita Fernandez Clerk, Hearing Boards City of Miami 444 S.W. 2°d Avenue 7'' Floor Miami, Florida 33130 Re: Letter of Intent for Metropolis at Bayshore, 1852-1900 N. Bayshore Drive, Miami, Florida Dear Ms. Fernandez: On behalf of the property owner Terra-Adi International Bayshore, LLC, we are submitting a Major Use Special Permit ("MUSP") application for approval of a mixed use phased development consisting of two (2) towers with a total of 752 units pursuant to Article 17, Section (1) and (7) of the Zoning Ordinance and approximately 8,470 square feet of commercial area. This development is not seeking any additional Floor Area Ratio ("FAR') through bonuses, nor is it requesting any variances of the Zoning Ordinance. Should you have any questions, please call me at (305) 579-0603. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, Lucia A. ougherty cc: Pedro Martin, Esq. Mr. David Martin Mr. Roberto Moreira Gloria M. Velazquez, Esq. \\MIA-SRVOI\VELAZQUEZG\1455457v01\V71 DOl !.DOC\3125103 GREENBERG TRAURIG, P.A. 1221 BRICKELL AVENUE MIAMI, FLORIDA 33131 305-579-0500 FAX 305-579-0717 www.gtlaw.com MIAMI NEW YORK WASHINGTON, D.C. ATLANTA PHILADELPHIA TYSONS CORNER CHICAGO BOSTON PHOENIX WILMINGTON LOS ANGELES DENVER FORT LAUDERDALE BOCA RATON WEST PALM BEACH ORLANDO TALLAHASSEE 03— Q Maj 9 PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT HEARING BOARDS DIVISION 444 SW 2nd Avenue, 7d' Floor • Miami, Florida 33130 Telephone 305-416-1480 • Fax 305-416-2035 APPLICATION FOR MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT IT IS INTENDED THAT MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMITS BE REQUIRED WHERE SPECIFIED USES AND/OR OCCUPANCIES INVOLVE MATTERS DEEMED TO BE OF CITYWIDE OR AREA -WIDE IMPORTANCE. THE CITY COMMISSION SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR DETERMINATIONS ON' APPLICATIONS FOR MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMITS. (SEE ARTICLE 17 OF ORDINANCE 11000, AS AMENDED, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA.) THE DIRECTOR OF THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING SHALL MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS ON ALL APPLICATIONS FOR MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMITS AND FOR ANY AMENDMENTS THERETO AND SHALL TRANSMIT SAID APPLICATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD FOR ITS RECOMMENDATIONS AND MAY MAKE REFERRALS TO OTHER AGENCIES, BODIES, OR OFFICERS FOR REVIEW, ANALYSIS, AND/OR TECHNICAL FINDINGS AND DETERMINATIONS AND REPORTS THEREON. (SEE SECTION 1301.4 OF ORDINANCE 11000, AS AMENDED, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA.) ANY PERSON WHO RECEIVES COMPENSATION, REMUNERATION OR EXPENSES FOR CONDUCTING LOBBYING ACTIVITIES TO REGISTER AS A LOBBYIST WITH THE CITY CLERK, PRIOR TO ENGAGING IN LOBBYING ACTIVITIES BEFORE CITY STAFF, BOARDS, COMMITTEES AND THE CITY COMMISSION. A COPY OF SAID ORDINANCE IS AVAILABLE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK (MIAMI CITY HALL), LOCATED AT 3500 PAN AMERICAN DRIVE, MIAMI, FLORIDA, 33133. APPLICANTS ARE RESPONSIBLE, IF NEEDED, TO BRING AN INTERPRETER FOR THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE TO ANY PRESENTATION BEFORE CITY BOARDS, COMMITTEES AND THE CITY COMMISSION. POWER OF ATTORNEY WILL BE _REQUIRED IF NEITHER APPLICANT OR LEGAL COUNSEL REPRESENTING THE APPLICANT EXECUTE THE APPLICATION OR DESIRE TO MAKE A PRESENTATION BEFORE CITY BOARDS, COMMITTEES AND THE CITY COMMISSION. I, Lucia A. Dougherty, on behalf of Terra-Adi International, LLC, hereby apply to the Director of the Planning and Zoning Department of the City of Miami for approval of a Major Use Special Permit under the provisions of Article 17 of the City of Miami Zoning Ordinance. Property Address: 1852 and 1900 North Bayshore Drive, Miami, Florida Nature of proposed use (be specific): A Maior Use Special Permit approval for a mixed use Phased development consisting of two (2) towers with a total of 752 units and approximately 8,470 square feet of commercial area. 1. Two 11x17" original current surveys and one 24x36" original survey, prepared by a State of Florida Registered Land Surveyor within six months from the date of application. 2. Two 11x17" original plans and one 24x36" original plan, signed and sealed by a State of Florida Registered Architect or Engineer showing property boundaries, existing (if any) and proposed structure(s), parking, landscaping, etc.; building elevations and dimensions and computations of lot area and building spacing. 3. Plans need to be stamped by the Hearing Boards Division first and then signed by Public Works, Zoning and Planning prior to submission of application. Rev. 06/04/02 03- 879 4. Affidavit and disclosure of ownership of subject property and disclosure of interest (see attached forms). 5. Certified list of owners of real estate within a 500 -feet radius from the outside boundary of property (see pages 5 and 6). 6. At least two photographs that show the entire property (land and improvements). 7. Maps showing the existing zoning designation and the adopted comprehensive plan designation for areas on and around the property. 8. General location map showing relation to the site or activity to major streets, schools, existing utilities, shopping areas, important physical features in and adjoining the project, and the like. 9. Concept Plan: a) Site plan and relevant information per Section 1304.2.1 d -h in Zoning Ordinance 11000, as amended. b) Relationships to surrounding existing and proposed uses and activities, systems and facilities, per Section 1702.2.2a in Zoning Ordinance 11000, as amended. c) How concept affects existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan principles and designations; tabulation of any required variances, special permits, changes of zoning or exemptions, per Section 1702.2.2b in Zoning Ordinance 11000, as amended. 10. Developmental Impact Study (ad application for development approval for a Development of Regional Impact may substitute). 11. Other (specify and attach cover letter explaining why any document you are attaching is pertinent to this application). 12. An 8 %Z x 11" copy of all exhibits that will be presented at the hearing. 13. Twenty-five (25) "Major Use Special Permit" books containing the above information. If this project requires Zoning Board approval, a total of thirty-five (35) books will be required. 14. Cost of processing according to the City Code: a) $ 45,000 , for the Major Use Special Permit, plus $1,150 advertising surcharge b) Additional fee of $ -0-, for any required special permits, changes of zoning or variances and land use amendment (Rezoning: $ -0- and CDMP.: $ -0-); Mailing Notice Fee: $483.00. c) Total Fee: $ 46,633.00 15. Is the property within the boundaries of a historic site, historic district or archeological zone designated pursuant to Chapter 23 of the Miami City Code? No. 16. Is the property within the boundaries of an Environmental Preservation District designated pursuant to Chapter 23 of the Miami City Code? No. 17. What is the purpose of this Major Use Special Permit? Approval of a mixed use phased development pursuant to Article 17. Rev. 06104/02 2 03- 8'79 Signature 129 Name Lucia A. Dougherty Address 1221 Brickell Avenue Miami, Florida 33131 Telephone (305)579-0603 Date May 6.2003 Rev. 06/04/02 3 03- 879 STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI -[JADE The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2003, by Lucia A. Dougherty who is an individual personally known to me or who has produced as identification and who did (did not) take an oath. (Stamp) Signature STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE The foregoing instrument wast - ,acknowledged before me this day of 20 , by of a corporation, on behalf of the corporation. He/She is personally known to me or has produced as identification and who did (did not) take an oath. (Stamp) Signature STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20 , by partner (or agent) on behalf of , a partnership. He/She is personally known to me or who has produced as identification and who did (did not) take an oath. (Stamp) Signature Rev. O&WO2 4 03— 879 MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT OWNER'S LIST Owner's Name Terra-Adi International Bayshore. LLC Mailing Address 1852 and 1900 North Bayshore Drive. Miami. Florida Telephone Number 3054164556 Legal Description: See Attached Exhibit "A" Owner's Name Mailing Address Zip Code Telephone Number Legal Description: Owner's Name Mailing Address Zip Code Telephone Number Legal Description: Any other real estate property owned individually, jointly, or severally (by corporation, partnership or privately) within 500 feet of the subject site is listed as follows: Street Address Legal Description NOaE . Re,,. osroaio2 5 03— 879 AFFIDAVIT Before me, the undersigned authority, this day personally appeared Lucia A. Dougherty , who being by me first deposes and says: 1. That he/she is the owner, or the legal representative of the owner, submitting the accompanying application for a public hearing as required by the Code of the City of Miami, Florida, affecting the real property located in the City of Miami, as described and listed on the foregoing pages of this affidavit and made a part thereof. 2. That all owners which he/she represents, if any, have given their full and complete permission for him/her to act in his/her behalf for the street closure as set out in the accompanying petition, ❑ including responding to day to day staff inquires; ❑ not including responding,lo day to day staff inquiries in which case he/she should be contacted at 3. That the foregoing pages are made a part of this affidavit contain the current names, mailing addresses, telephone numbers and legal descriptions for the real property of which he/she is the owner or legal representative. 4. The facts as represented in the application and documents submitted in conjunction with this affidavit are true and correct. Further Affiant sayeth not. Lucia A. Doneherty Applicant Name Applicant Signature STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this l0 day of 2003, by Lucia A. Dougherty individually. /Sbg iserso al own to me or who has produced as identification and w o did (did not) take an oath. Stam M�MRW ( P) NOri'AWPUBUC STATE OF FMM A COMMMON No. CCOM MY 0DN% 99QN EXP. NOV. 9 Rev. 06/04/02 C: L " el I ___� Signature 03— 879 MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT DISCLOSURE OF OWNERSHIP 1. Legal description and street address of subject real property: 1852 and 1900 North Bayshore Drive, Miami, Florida 01-3231-003-0530 01-3231-000-0510 Lots 1, 4 and 5, Block 7 of MIRAMAR THIRD AMENDED SUBDIVISION, according to the map or plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 5, Page 4 of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida. 2. Owner(s) of subject real property and percentage of ownership. Note: The Code of the City of Miami requires disclosure of all parties having a financial interest, either direct or indirect, in the subject matter of a presentation, request or petition to the City Commission. Accordingly, question #2 requires disclosure of shareholders of corporations, beneficiaries of trusts, and/or any other interested parties, together with their addresses and proportionate interest. See attached Exhibit "A' 3. Legal description and street address of any real property (a) owned by any party listed in answer to question #2, and (b) located within 500 feet of the subject real property. None Lucia A. Dougherty rA Owner or Attorney for Owner Name Owner or Attorney for Owner Signature STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _L_- day of 2003, by Lucia A. Doneherty individually. He/She is na known to me or who has produced as identification and who di(did not) take an oath. oF67CIAL N AR FAIL MIRRWA M 1NMyCoMMNWNM.N(T'7.R'= IZARY PUBi IC SrATIE OFF FW-PMA(Stamp) ooaMloNNo.C Rev. 06/04/02 Signature 7 03-- 879 Dated Apri12, 2003 TERRA -ADI INTERNATIONAL BAYSHORE, LLC OWNERSHIP SCHEDULE 1. ADI Investment Bayshore, Inc. Raimundo Onetto 14% Jorge Rosenblut 14% Ignacio Hernandez 14% 2. Gallina Dale Corporation Hugo Hoffman 3. Winford Holdings Florida, Inc. Maria Elena Celedon 4. Terra -ADI International Management, LLC 53.50A A. Terra International Holdings, LLC 26.75% Pedro A. Martin 17.83% Jorge Lamadrid 8.92% B. Archiplan Development Dadeland, Inc. 26.75% Raimundo Onetto 6.68% Jorge Rosenblut 6.69% Ignacio Hernandez 6.69% Patricio Kreutzberger 6.69% 100% Total 03- 879 METROPOLIS AT BAYSHORE MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT PROJECT DESCRIPTION Zoning Ordinance No. 11000 1. Section 1304.2.1 Application forms; supplementary materials (a) Statements of ownership and control of the proposed development of activity. The Disclosure of Ownership and Ownership Affidavit are provided in Article I, Tab B. (b) Statement describing in detail the character and intended use of the development or activity. The Metropolis at Bayshore is planned to be a phased high-rise residential condominium: -development project consisting of two interconnected towers with a total of 752 units.. The proposed project will be constructed in two phases consisting of a 48 and 40 levels in each tower with 448 units in phase I and 304 units in phase H. Each tower will be independent of the other. In addition, there will be a total of 8,470 square feet of restaurant/retaiYoffice space. Furthermore, the development will host a variety of amenities including a gym with steam room, outdoor swimming pool, meditation outdoor garden, within a total of approximately 69,750 square feet of recreational space and pool plaza area and approximately 848 parking spaces. Tab 6 of the supporting documents. The towers will be situated on approximately 1.506 acres or 65,595 n`et square feet of land located on North Bayshore Drive in Miami, Florida. The subject property, is directly opposite the newly refurbished Margaret Pace Park located on Biscayne Bay. The main entrance to the project is through a beautifully landscaped driveway accessible from North Bayshore Drive and NE 4th Avenue. Entrance to the parking garage will be from the east side of the property along North Bayshore Drive. Building residents will be able to chose between valet parking or self parking. The majority of the tower units will have views of Biscayne Bay, the Downtown Miami skyline and surrounding areas to the Northwest of Downtown Miami. The architects, Nichols Brosch and Sandoval, while designing the buildings were sensitive to the North Bayshore scenic corridor, and therefore designed the building to step back on the north and south side allowing a greater t feeling of openness to the pedestrian and automobiles traveling on North Bayshore Drive. In addition, the building was designed to minimize the . t;. 9 3 - 879 l impact of the parking garage along North Bayshore drive by outlining the garage with loft residential units. It was also intended for the towers to be placed as far back from North Bayshore Drive, which is residential in nature, while respecting the intent of the areas created along the Drive. (c) General location map, showing relation of the site or activity for which special permit is sought to major streets, schools, existing utilities, shopping areas, important physical features in and adjoining the project or activity and the like. The following exhibits are included with the Major Use Special Permit Application under Tab 1 of the Supporting Documents: (1) Map of the surrounding street system indicating the project location. (2) Aerial photograph of the surrounding area indicating the project site. (d) A site plan containing the title of the project and the names of the project planner and developer, date, and north arrow and, based on an exact survey of the pibperty drawn to a scale of sufficient size to show: The site plan is located under Tab 6. The site plan includes the following: (1) Boundaries of the project, any existing streets, buildings, watercourses, easements and section lines; The boundaries of the project and the location of existing streets and easements are shown on the Survey located under Tab 5 of the Supporting Documents. (2) Exact location of all buildings and structures; See Tab 6.- (3) ; (3) Access and traffic flow and how vehicular traffic will be separated from pedestrian and other types of traffic; A detailed analysis of the site access and traffic flow for the development is provided in the Traffic Impact Analysis located under Tab 2 of the Supporting Documents. Traffic circulation to the site will only occur from North Bayshore Drive and NE 4th Avenue. The service access to the development will enter and exit from the North end of the site on NE 0 Avenue. 2 ��3- 879 (4) Offstreet parking and offstreet loading areas; Offstreet parking will be located in the 11 -story parking garage. Loading and delivery parking will be located on the ground floor. (5) Recreational facilities locations; Recreational facilities for the development are shown located on the Site Plan under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. Amenities will include two (2) swimming pools, caf6, private fitness center, media room, social club area, covered recreation area, saunas and whirlpool and sundeck, spa, business center. (6) Screens and buffers; Landscaping and buffer areas are indicated on the Landscape Plan, under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (7) Refuse collections areas; z, t4 Waste collection will be provided by a containerized compactor system located within the buildings. (8) Access to utilities and points of utilities hookups. Access and connections to site utilities are discussed in the Site Utility Study located under Tab 3 of the Supporting Documents. (e) Tabulations of total gross acreage in the project and the percentages thereof proposed to be devoted to: (1) The various permitted uses and ground coverage of structures; Building footprint: 52,565 S.F. Floor Area: (F.A.R.) 819,300.S.F. (2) Ground coverage by structures Ground coverage 52,565 sq. & (80%) (f) Tabulation showing: (1) The derivation of numbers of offstreet parking and offstreet loading spaces shown in (d) above; ( The total number of required parking spaces is 797 and 845 spaces are provided 3 93- 879 (2) Total project density in dwelling units per acre. The Metropolis at Bayshore will consist of 752 residential units. Total project density is 500 dwelling units per net acre. (g) If common facilities (such as recreation areas of structures, private streets, common open space, etc.) are to be provided for the development, statements as to how such common facilities are to be provided and permanently maintained Common facilities to be provided will include the two (2) swimming pools, caf6, private fitness center, media room, social club area, covered recreation area, saunas and whirlpool and sundeck, spa, business center. (h) Storm drainage and sanitary sewerage plans. Storm drainage, water distribution, waste water and solid waste generation provisions are discussed in the Site Utility Study located under Tab 3 of the Supporting Documents. (i} Architectural definitions for buildings in the development; exact number of dwelling units, sizes, and types, together with typical floor plans of each type. The development will consist of a residential high-rise building. The typical floor plans for residential units are included under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (j) Plans for signs, if any. Signage approval will be addressed by Class H Permit at a later time. (k) Landscaping plan, including types, sizes and locations of vegetation and decorative shrubbery, and showing provisions for irrigation and future maintenance. The landscaping plan under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents, specifies the plant types, sizes and locations, as well as, indications that all planted areas will be fully irrigated and maintained by the owner and ultimately the condominium association. 4 ��3- 879 (1) Plans for recreation facilitates, if any, including location and general description of buildings for such use. Recreational facilities for the development are shown located on the Site Plan under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. They include two (2) swimming pools, caf6, private fitness center, media room, social club area, covered recreation area, saunas and whirlpool and sundeck, a spa and a business center. (m) Such additional data, maps, plans, or statements as may be required for the particular use or activity involved The Drawings Submitted with this Application are located under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (n) Such additional data as the applicant may believe is pertinent to the proper consideration of the site and development plan. 2. Section 1702.2.1 General Report. (1) Property ownership and beneficial interest within the boundaries of the area proposed for Major Use Special Permit. Statement of Ownership and beneficial interest within the boundaries of the area proposed for Major Use Special Permit are provided in Article I, Tab B. (2) The nature of the unified interest or control. The nature of unified interest or control is indicated in Article I, Tab B. (3) Survey of the proposed area showing property lines and ownership. ` A copy of the Surveys are included under Tab 5 of the Supporting Documents. (4) Map of existing features, including streets, alleys, easements, utilities lines, existing land use, general topography, and physical features. The existing site features and utility lines are shown on the Survey plans located under Tab 5 and the Site Utility Study, located under Tab 3 of the Supporting Documents. In addition, the following exhibits are included with the Major Use Special Permit Application. (5) Materials to demonstrate the relationship of the elements listed in (4) preceding to surrounding area characteristics. The Drawings Submitted with this Application are located under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. s 03- 879 (6) Existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan designations for the area on and around the lands proposed for Major Use Special Permit Pursuant to City of Miami Ordinance No. 11000, the existing zoning designation for the property is SD -6 Central Commercial Residential District). Page 23 of the Zoning Atlas Map is located in Article I, Tab D and indicates the existing and surrounding zoning designations. However, since this property was recently rezoned to SD -6 the zoning map does not depict the current zoning. We have attached a letter from the Zoning Administrator indicating the zoning designation of the property as it currently stands, as well as Zoning Ordinance No. 12197 which rezoned the property to SD -6. The comprehensive plan future land use designation for the property is Restricted Commercial. We have included in Article I, Tab D, Zoning Ordinance No. 12196 which amended the future land use map to Restricted Commercial. The zoning- designations and the comprehensive plan designation are consistent with one another. 3. Section 1702.2.2 Major.Use Special Permit Concept Plan. a. Relationships of the concept plan to surrounding existing and proposed future uses. This Article contains a written narrative of this project outlining proposed uses, activities and architectural character. This narrative also contains descriptions of the project's relationship to traffic, pedestrian movements, and transportation access. Maps submitted indicate the project's relationship to surrounding streets, land uses and functions. Building elevations, sections and perspectives showing the proposed materials, vertical profile and height, and orientation to streets are included in the drawings submitted with this Application. The list of drawings submitted is found under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. b. Existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan principles and designations. This project conforms with the zoning designation of the property with the approval of the MUSP, and Class I and Class Il permits. The proposed project is consistent with the comprehensive plan future land use designation for this property. Simultaneous requests have been made with this MUSP application for Class I and Class H permits, as well as, designation of as a phased development. 4.. Section 1702.2,3 Developmental Impact Study. a. A traffic analysis shall be submitted for an area within approximately 1/4 mile of the site, or an area including the major intersections to be impacted by the site, whichever is larger. The Traffic Impact Analysis is inchuled under Tab 2 of the Supporting Documents. b. Economic impact data shall be provided, including estimates for construction costs, construction employment, and permanent employment and shall demonstrate that the proposed development is favorable to the economy, public services, environment and housing supply of the City. The Economic Impact Study is included under Tab 4 of the Supporting Documents. C. A housing impact assessment. The property will be a high-rise residential building. The City of Miami has a demand for additional housipg. d. A description of proposed energy conservation measures shall be provided, including only those measures that are proposed in addition to the minimum requirements in State Energy Code. Architecturally, the building envelope will be comprised of insulated walls and roof and tinted/laminated glass. The building is equipped with modern mechanical equipment which are up to standard and energy efficient. e. Historic Buildings The property contains no historic buildings. E Environmental Zone The Property is not within a City of Miami Environmental Preservation District. 03- 879 Instrument Prepared by, J Return to: Carlos M. Rodriguez, Esq. Greenberg Traurig, P.A. 1221 Brickell Avenue — 24h Floor Miami, FL 33131 Parcel Nos.: 01-3231-003-0510 01-3231-003-0530 �,Y-.e, E.� . 21020P607, 4 Space above this line for recorder's use only Tax ID No.: 36 - q q .� 7 `)S % SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED THIS INDENTURE made as of this IM -k day of February, 2003, by and between PARKSHORE ON THE BAY, L.L.C., a Florida limited liability company ("Grantor"), for and in consideration of Ten Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration in hand paid, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, hereby grants, bargains, sells, aliens, remises, releases and conveys unto TERRA -ADI INTERNATIONAL BAYSHORE, LLC, a Florida limited liability company ("Grantee") having an address of /-Z00 R R►LKel- - 4PE 4 s a I TF &00 M,An„ Fr a! the following described real property in the County of Miami -Dade, State of Florida, to -wit: SEE EXHIBIT A ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF SUBJECT TO REAL ESTATE TAXES FOR THE YEAR 2003 AND SUBSEQUENT YEARS. SUBJECT TO THOSE CERTAIN PERMITTED TITLE EXCEPTIONS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT B ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF. TOGETHER with all the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances, with every privilege, right, title, interest and estate, reversion, remainder and easement thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same in fee simple forever. And the Grantor does hereby covenant that Grantor does fully warrant the title to the above- described real estate so hereby conveyed and will defend the same against the lawful claims, arising out of events occurring prior to the recording of this Deed, all of persons claiming by, through or under the Grantor, but against none other. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor aforesaid has set its hand and seal as of the _Lgrh day of February, 2003. WITNESSES: PAMSH BAY, L.L.C. Print me: 5f Hoilq CZ By: Alan Freeman, Manager Print Name: MAaa v kn �3-- 879 fi 2 1 020PGL / 55 Space above this line for recorder's, use only STATE OF ILLINOIS ) COUNTY OF C 0 0 K ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this kill day of February, 2003, by ALAN FREEMAN, as Manager of PARKSHORE ON THE BAY, L.L.C., a Florida limited liability company. 8451 s7_2.noC E All Notary Public My Commission Expires: E A SEAL" CRAMAROSSO, STATE OF ILLINOISN EXPIRES 5/11/2006 03- 879 21020Pu0755 Space above this line for recorder's use only EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lots 1, 4 and 5, Block 7, of MIRAMAR THIRD AMENDED SUBDIVISION, according to the plat thereof, recorded in Plat Book 5, Page 4, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida. Parcel Numbers: 01-3231-003-0510 01-3231-003-0530 Address: 1852 and 1900 Norffi Bayshore Drive Miami, Florida 03- S79 A-1 0"T. REC. Ei. 21020PGO757 Space above this line for recorder's use only EXHIBIT B PERMITTED EXCEPTIONS 1. Riparian or littoral rights. 2. Easements or claims of easements not shown by the Public Records, boundary line disputes, overlaps, encroachments, and any matters not of record which would be disclosed by an accurate survey and inspection of the premises. 3. Any claim to any portion of the land below the ordinary high water line of Biscayne Bay and other adjacent waters, if any. 4. Rights of the State of Florida based on the doctrine of the state's sovereign ownership of lands lying below the mean high water line of any navigable or tidally influenced waters. 5. Any land which is artificially filled land in what was formerly navigable waters, is subject to the rights of the United States government, arising by said government's control over navigable waters involving navigation and commerce. 6. Matters contained in the P Amended Plat of Miramar, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 5, Page 4, all of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida. 7. Restrictions, dedications and easements as shown on the Plat of P Amended Plat of Miramar recorded in Plat Book 5, Page 4. NOTE: This exception omits any restriction, covenant, or condition based on race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status or national origin, if any, unless and only to the extent that the restriction is not in violation of state or federal law, or relates to a handicap, but does not discriminate against handicapped people. 8. Easement(s) granted to Florida Power and Light Company, recorded April 1, 1980 in Official Records Book 10704, Page 1842 (as to Lots 1 and 4), of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida. 9. Terms, covenants, conditions and other matters contained in the Memorandum of PCS Site Agreement, recorded February 18, 1998, in Official Records Book 17982, Page 4280, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida. 10. Liens for any unpaid special assessments for the year 2003 and subsequent years arising by virtue of the ordinances and resolutions creating these districts and more specifically set forth as follows: Ordinances and Resolutions recorded in Official Records Book 11114, Page 822, Official Records Book 12923, Page 2618, Official Records Book 12923, Page 2622, B-1 93- 879 21020PGO758 Space above this line for recorder's use only Official Records Book 14258, Page 2399, Official Records Book 14646, Page 2513, Official Records Book 15168, Page 2413, Official Records Book 15615, Page 1652, Official Records Book 16035, Page 3996, Official Records Book 16478, Page 1048, Official Records Book 16872, Page 1634 and Official Records Book 17326, Page 2605, all of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida. ME 03- 879 Miami -Dade My Home My Home Show Me: Property Information Search By: Select Item Summary Details: olio No.: 1423,1-003-0530 ro 852 N BAYSHORE DR ailing ERRA ADI INATL dress: YSHORE LLC 0$1,126,5-1$675.9001 200 BRICKELL AVE STE $675,900 80 MIAMI FL $675,900 131 - Pro ertInformation: maty 6402 MIX USE -BORDERS ne: CBD LUC: 81 VACANT LAND s/Baths: 0 loons: vin Units: di Sq e: ze: 530 SQ FT Built: - 1 53 42 MIRAMAR PB 5-4 OT 5 BLK 7 AND PROP INT egal N & TO COMMON sc 'ption: LEMENTS NOT EDICATED TO PUBLIC OT SIZE 22530 SQUARE EET Page 1 of 2 MIAMI-DAnr- ft q a [-'� n sip® Legend Property Boundary Selected Property Sale Information: Digital Orthophotography - March 2001 0 � 120 it n 1020-0754 003 unt: 9,950,000 My Home I Properly Information I Proper Taxes I My Neighborhood I Prones praiser Assessment Information: Home I using Our Site I About I Phone Directory I Privacy I Disclaimer If you experience technical di iculd" with the Property Information application, please dick here to lot us know. E-mail your comments, questions and suggestions to Webmaster Web Site 02002 Miami -Dade County. All rights reserved. r/✓ Street OV Highway Miami -Dad County ■ Water N W E S 03- 879 http://gisims2.co.miami-dade.fl.uslmyhomelpropmap.asp?app-propmap&bytool=FOLIO&cmd=FINDFOL... 4/1/2003 2002 2001 $1,126,500 $675,900 $0 $0 0$1,126,5-1$675.9001 $1,126,500 $675,900 e: $1,126,500 $675,900 $0 $0 $1,126,500 $675,900 If you experience technical di iculd" with the Property Information application, please dick here to lot us know. E-mail your comments, questions and suggestions to Webmaster Web Site 02002 Miami -Dade County. All rights reserved. r/✓ Street OV Highway Miami -Dad County ■ Water N W E S 03- 879 http://gisims2.co.miami-dade.fl.uslmyhomelpropmap.asp?app-propmap&bytool=FOLIO&cmd=FINDFOL... 4/1/2003 Miami -Dade My Home My Home offiamomkow Show Me: Property Information Search By: Select Item ;` uetalls: r (SHORE LLC 0 BRICKELL AVE STE MIAMI FL 31- Pronerty Information: naryP2Ej MIX USE -BORDERS one:LUC: nd Value. $2,203,400 $1233,904 HEALTH CARE s/t10lours:vin $2,066,096 arket Value: $4,312,488 Un,�e:3iize:8 Value: $4,312,488 $3300000 otal em tions: SQ FT�r BuilMAR $4,312,488= PB 5-4 LOTS 1 & 7 & PROP INT IN & alOMMON ELEMENTS ptiDEDICATED TO IC OR 21020-0754 2 2 Page 1 of 2 MIAMI -DAVE q C ° n E® Sale Information: E 1020-0754 Digital Orthophotography - March 2001 0 � 120 It : 003 unt: IS9,950,000 Assessment Information:My Home I Proptft Information I Propgdy Taxes I My Neighborhood I Prope ft AR }rraiser ear. 2002 2001 Home I Using Our Site I About I Phone Directory I Privacy I Disclaimer f you experience technical difficulties with the Property Information application, please dick ter to let us know. E-mail your comments, questions and suggestions to Webmaster Web Site ® 2002 Miami -Dade County. All rights reserved. Legend nd Value. $2,203,400 $1233,904 uildin Value: $2,109,088 $2,066,096 arket Value: $4,312,488 $3,300,000 Value: $4,312,488 $3300000 otal em tions: axable Value: $4,312,488= f you experience technical difficulties with the Property Information application, please dick ter to let us know. E-mail your comments, questions and suggestions to Webmaster Web Site ® 2002 Miami -Dade County. All rights reserved. f✓ Street 04V Highway Miami -Dad County ■ Water N W E S o3- 8'79 http://gisims2.co.miami-dade.fl.us/myhome/propmap.asp?app-- propmap&bytool=none&cmd=SELECT&to... 4/1/2003 Legend Property Boundary N Selected Property f✓ Street 04V Highway Miami -Dad County ■ Water N W E S o3- 8'79 http://gisims2.co.miami-dade.fl.us/myhome/propmap.asp?app-- propmap&bytool=none&cmd=SELECT&to... 4/1/2003 C. Q METROPOLIS AT BAYSHORE 1852 —1900 N. BAYSHORE DRIVE MIAMI, FLORIDA MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 17, Section 1701(1) for development of 752 residential units. MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 17, Section 1701(7) for parking structure of 848 parking spaces. The Major Use encompasses the following special permits: CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 6, Section 606.3.1, for development of new construction within the Special District. CLASS H SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 6, Section 606.3.1, for a temporary construction fence and covered walkway. CLASS H SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9 to allow a reduction in the size of loading berths. CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 906.6, for active outdoor recreational facilities (including swimming pools). CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 918.2 to permit staging and parking during construction. CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 925.3.8, to allow development/construction/rental signage. CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 917.1.2, to allow valet parking for residential use. CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 920.1, to allow a construction trailer and other temporary office uses such as leasing and sales. CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Section 915.2 for FAA clearance letter. Designation as a phased development pursuant to Section 2502 of Ordinance No. 11000. J ce McPhee Interim Zoning Administrator Date 03- 879 February 11, 2003 Submittal to Internal Design Review Committee February 18, 2003 Submittal to Large Scale Development Review March 19, 2003 Submittal to urban Design Review Board May 6, 2003 Submittal to MUSP ..6VETROPOLIS BAYSHORE 1900 NORTH BAYSHORE DRIVE r MIAMI, FLORIDA c' terra•, `�� TERRA A.D.I. INTERNATIONAL P DEVELOPER 1200 BRICIKELL AVENUE, SUITE 630, MIAMI, FLORIDA 33131 ■ 1E0LL1[/ElVlldl latlal NlaSJ Tbw AMOUnn fir: Fla1[Ns ■ aFN VRa) N'+A kN [p .Y. NY [t.:r�MN Pitt N@epRkr@tPa.a OS W 1 R[pY.fliNMaA �tYUN' e.af lusur be N t:rt e MirFEIFARG ilQlftpnt b»;p+ae; RfgA1RalNTI m.HSYar.M la4 � OPEN NACF Ki'u: F1fh}6P r1)f tie H/m •+:i PAgrfRlYtOlYIE SOA?a+[YCnrisPYMYrre Oqt; Pa's Sa bM sf A}Y PaYT[PG.kn prxlgl �Yl [R16aFaflLL IYNrett4�ann»uw,YY w.oml ti3O.P..xrm,: [l+Kuf Pm P.+[Y.r'AU IYU iIOORARG MTIO i}GpnrtN %atbaea � rAMMOP110Y1WR1 µo6 u+awev»Htn..+rn Jert Yet *SGt UfIN•0.Y 1NPY Ht'i KrA mrmnNfno,[an � AONLLRlf9BONL Ea:?Y.r.lan SS)PU 4P n Ip})'ta IJNI YH' x.1f}6 •iN•Sdyv.. lOp1ARMMlq Ybfllftfr lqt'. N9JIli Mea: to RNiEnO Srlamv trrnnYie Per i(E2i�Jr[nra pttlt 2'afv Ta1iAAMta 1)f.5N8 �.t:t}yY H. �+Y' P:fe},XO �IQtl•f\ + AaJRfineafAR.: lip .»[u rf rr TNM.ei lawo'6a4Y 0'ru a[.tNvwn NynfrargsPae Kr @A 6' � LLIpvALLE {4vrubN �»afaniY HKt`1PYHaH fCf •Pro•SKn.a MpIgIpX1aL '}Fet l+tptwWru rr[� VM IlOd1ARMM11/ f2, INfifl.:,b 4'}9 ?rmWtn.. [Nlht ft ACIWL pM1t }}yry'f FE- » '+f f MpfR[/tEIRW MJaert f19EIlMMMfi Pebl ag @l " l All YevLMt m }. hYluYr AS � THYfAR NYt oAp FtN HnM1»eYfAR-. OT ee.t..x rK. rowht�tY lNw+ [f} + Efl � TOTLL tldlmrubM[uYpl vrn M'.MYb PHwsi ltrm6[an C!n ALLgYANEfIRAND +wta<.aaatr�tf@.ama.,[»tA' ICPUu rIR Aai WuaLfAd: IA ) Pnvrlfte:e[ At0M 1AnMtw@viYi AN.: ,N iwYMWPbrrNq WM•wl u faYAa/f M1 T IwwlNpRt111ab1WlneNl hl ■ ALLOIYALLFDflglfl YdObµ4•t ya• 6aosAaoe}wWYNw.ia+U.bANae ■REOVI aclit111fE RKavfAn»Ue PY1ry FPYY1 AJipY MX�GO/WT/ 1a:Tml lad Prtw l; ))t P•eH}:. rANINE ErAtEI 1♦MNf. Rtyi:HArt»Dtl'n P<riy S{ml• .tr,d � ffIMCXfI SwItlMvp.ut vYWiewliw Amu I;.d• S TAEOl RlaaYp OwYa'beM+Oln{w1 k. ■ rR0ME0ACEENMf Pevav P.�KlRartuq &o[N I/TRACRII Yw@trwmpw ARDIIROteFI iwNMHdEP. rAMIq NAC[i PinUgAwHNvarPrrry Mwi t OY d+YY s tMr44t METIYNE1I N/TEWRIEfOp1AyE IRII ipllMlvpI/WARFW0TA0[ +ulY A 1 A r M' it 1< /• f ✓ ell "I ,NYt •:fK�;f Mal February 11, 2003 Submittal to Internal Design Review Committee February 18, 2003 Submittal to Large Scale Development Review March 19, 2003 Submittal to urban Design Review Board May 6, 2003 Submittal to MUSP ..6VETROPOLIS BAYSHORE 1900 NORTH BAYSHORE DRIVE r MIAMI, FLORIDA c' terra•, `�� TERRA A.D.I. INTERNATIONAL P DEVELOPER 1200 BRICIKELL AVENUE, SUITE 630, MIAMI, FLORIDA 33131 o mm o mm a mm D mm A Mal D mm ....r 4.'ia a7 m m py^ li m m O mm v mm a mm o m m a m m a mm <e. o mm o mm v mm l) m m o mm 0 m maim r o mm o mm >T o mm . Y" v mm ®® ®® TRACT "B' ILABTEROCOMPANY PLAT OK 158, PAGE 87--------------------------------------------------- o e o h MIRAMAR / PLAT BOOK 5. PAGE 4 ,r v ---------------- ¢ ti N I Jr'•r .J,11.t •I NE 19th ,STREET No LOT LOT 2 ^a 1��LL "n B LV A C. LOT 3 �` IC � �2 i LOT 5 1 s'10 "1 r Ito u �✓ R�1 LOT y nax. J :! /BL®CK 71. / MRAMAR THIRD AMENDED SUBIPIVSIDN P.O. 5, PQ. 4 LOT 1 „ ®`l 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 LOT B 1 J SITE N. E. 181,11 STREET r- -- -1 r,T l-1 I If --101 i' �L_ L_ JL_J�LJL\\ � 1 t_� f N.E. 118th STREET v S NI I I I I I i I L Ira �_ wr rrTA rTrT; ��r =;z<< V �m` w N.E. 17th TERRACE l3 I I I 1 I I 1 i I I I I LOCATION SKETCH O.YNq ti'all O. .lu lar . a�aF -� � ax q�nF :owa soon • �:r:..m o:w.,w... ��¢ IE[IaL ceRcw•rNN IE w�ii.11' �riwaW a1�M� �+ r1Yr W I rw-iw bub. /Mw � M rr✓.. (aaIVEYORBM(NE0. �: ti..F a.u.. !:. rF.rb N rila a•.. [•a ab r n.rL rrar - M ae,FaY w eY F N I.Y ay. r�ryw�•br OM'. rMr .w� .Fwrrwr wrL 1 I �� bb:►N 'ora�i�a.i w.'�'r a L11WA rl�.a��ili e�iwi afiL ~ 1 wMMwry WMr+yrr:slra..rr Frwrr r. w:...: 1 w•r. r r Iwl•. r FFFw Lr••..1 .a. w ulu..w w .: rwr w r 1 I a`w. a wLL l F,wl .m . rrw 1 I a lY Y Y N wY . rr.:. r ti r H •..l:a Iw r Iar..:vY F 1 C, ...ze�b.r•�a .�ii.va• 1 i ,pMy� 1 11 rb4�ra wi+ aaa VVVVl M W a.a l�a..w aaar ma ..r am, a : .w. m :.r. i Irl. viii au nra •.r. � nr. •+ as aaa I.n Fw Iw 1 � � •.' IW aaa na. Fiw row 1 1 r .rratr w r rrFwrb r r .:r 1- I _u iriilrrr�rr wir a�i�. of W. �y 1 - Mr. r r•r w nrr r r :tart Frb•: w4r aru. r Its. IW r.:r r.a o.a. •a. paw gray rrr F r u .F. r 1 w.q r r .a Ir srw w ar.....IF•a 1 - �Ir. wrr •r rwrl F Iw•r lbw Mw . l0 W . W ltl N .m 1:) cw.r rr b...!• .al i E.Iw lb. q wr rl •..w M V!• 'M 1 _ eww„�rrrr F•w w w .carr .r• . Vr r.w. r.rr rrw p Fa. rr�r. wr 1 -rr rr r.rrWala.a ... Iw•Ixa+�.wFti 1 - R.Vr. r rFw L•.,tle - a.•rrr LL. rrF 1 l - v wwra w w •r rrw:. r.w - 1 i � - tar w..M• w.. wr Mval b rw 1 I ElnrEvoREcelrsrw7olm 1 III.I .I.a9. Arai FA ' 1 1�Y aYMY tl'�IR.N.1� L 1:I:IMbL rA jl �M.naRm GURVEVMOERTW"TIM �u:. i .+moi. lwl� rr W ..:.:....�� .+�:`r�i+r.�.aul'rnn• Irr 1 r"111,LIFA awu�� �- W W : cr U c m f'f SCALE. N LEGENO R o. wlet T �_- u°Y. mswP O.YNq ti'all O. .lu lar . a�aF -� � ax q�nF :owa soon • �:r:..m o:w.,w... ��¢ IE[IaL ceRcw•rNN IE w�ii.11' �riwaW a1�M� �+ r1Yr W I rw-iw bub. /Mw � M rr✓.. (aaIVEYORBM(NE0. �: ti..F a.u.. !:. rF.rb N rila a•.. [•a ab r n.rL rrar - M ae,FaY w eY F N I.Y ay. r�ryw�•br OM'. rMr .w� .Fwrrwr wrL 1 I �� bb:►N 'ora�i�a.i w.'�'r a L11WA rl�.a��ili e�iwi afiL ~ 1 wMMwry WMr+yrr:slra..rr Frwrr r. w:...: 1 w•r. r r Iwl•. r FFFw Lr••..1 .a. w ulu..w w .: rwr w r 1 I a`w. a wLL l F,wl .m . rrw 1 I a lY Y Y N wY . rr.:. r ti r H •..l:a Iw r Iar..:vY F 1 C, ...ze�b.r•�a .�ii.va• 1 i ,pMy� 1 11 rb4�ra wi+ aaa VVVVl M W a.a l�a..w aaar ma ..r am, a : .w. m :.r. i Irl. viii au nra •.r. � nr. •+ as aaa I.n Fw Iw 1 � � •.' IW aaa na. Fiw row 1 1 r .rratr w r rrFwrb r r .:r 1- I _u iriilrrr�rr wir a�i�. of W. �y 1 - Mr. r r•r w nrr r r :tart Frb•: w4r aru. r Its. IW r.:r r.a o.a. •a. paw gray rrr F r u .F. r 1 w.q r r .a Ir srw w ar.....IF•a 1 - �Ir. wrr •r rwrl F Iw•r lbw Mw . l0 W . W ltl N .m 1:) cw.r rr b...!• .al i E.Iw lb. q wr rl •..w M V!• 'M 1 _ eww„�rrrr F•w w w .carr .r• . Vr r.w. r.rr rrw p Fa. rr�r. wr 1 -rr rr r.rrWala.a ... Iw•Ixa+�.wFti 1 - R.Vr. r rFw L•.,tle - a.•rrr LL. rrF 1 l - v wwra w w •r rrw:. r.w - 1 i � - tar w..M• w.. wr Mval b rw 1 I ElnrEvoREcelrsrw7olm 1 III.I .I.a9. Arai FA ' 1 1�Y aYMY tl'�IR.N.1� L 1:I:IMbL rA jl �M.naRm GURVEVMOERTW"TIM �u:. i .+moi. lwl� rr W ..:.:....�� .+�:`r�i+r.�.aul'rnn• Irr 1 r"111,LIFA awu�� �- W W : cr U c m f'f OW-No OEM WWOR "T, MIAM 7 ,___ �! ,,,, � iii �®��I�-a . . . . . . . . . . I 71A WA -W- R` '.��. oo OIL II\ � -- - - -- ux. suem apr rmn MyAC.M nAN /eM1Ar 'raa JL4— > - z WACR GPM nAn � �� � �� MT198VAlOnS YYIUM � / MFLTIAlAGI. r)1 YAIq.T \ mmm I \ I F1 LOBBY LEVEL PLAN LEVEL 100 (PARKING LRVRL P1) Y M G 00 Q� A2 l t / ./ / 1tAfIr00V .; �/ J11A701 JI H IIMA1p� i u � otvlab Juu C AIpLC6J M � � III Ii n u I n v v s e u n p u u p ewr < rAMM if I. � AW Ir11A>bJ (. 1 C,Illy ,JIT MJIYAJIJIRvppJAOpr EZe L - Iif pAYA10tl 1 \ 4 J \ am >• n n fl p 1 / / I I > X11 Dfn 1 \ \' KEW f / it i GROUND FLOOR PL, L YEL 100 (PARKMLEVBLPl) 0 " •J N uric uwr■ ; el, / Inrr o " IWwAlw.a , \_ o / • I 77 rr1A1L'I - / 1 mum 1" r 1/ lJ MN WIII rmwK a t II �� .J r •e I 1 I Lan" w 4' 111661JJ/11 t j-..,Y.r _ pm n w xmN 1 w InrAC>Sr � \ 1 IJ \`I� \ ••I W11Nltl�p J w JI w J] N Id II I.�� 1 MUM I I� i IIWEI JI � IJ I OM r a w 1D - . smurw I 1 1JIp wsvAmu � n 1\ V \ U U U \ JM/�l u1N 73 1 n w\ JlpnuJx LOPTN 1 , IlluutX / I IWIUJx � s\ owl / TYPICAL LOMPARKING (PARQQOUrff1. P]) I m �A / 4unsK NMm4umamUro'Dw �\ / INMunI wrreIrJIYA1Rt Iwwro ) s » u n n /' Na m / I» ernMro— / ,x nm rAuwMw a t VA I, 16 17 IsWnu» 10 I j I , U 1 ��IIaNuro » () Lobi r [x �I rAll[aKMV � L MtlAtaq _,1 \ \I1 IevaAro tM>a, I \ 1 uwrI1M4Mro WIYAroM �< `U. 1NMKro LML ate, IMMIK r i A n tl \iMnMix II \ \\ LViN / I IM/IM19 \ OLV � 1 i• I \ IPS LOFT\PARKT LEMS /00THRU 100 (PARKINO MRS PI 7HMU PI I) V A5 \ 1 .W VAN 061ilgNIXf nry _ .A/ \ rm+®c¢rtu I M fA(Bwu - 6J GJ tN GO Lo oA Y.J 4J LJ OJ Go o LO LO Isamllm AAM • �i eruu �f to uar mml 1 ` �- II aux c WWt,a.. o•S co c-> - f OJ rove ... � 4J GJ � 'yJ., LEI IV3 RINAIIMR T /' it � / \ IlvraAVaY on o O Aw aaR ffYy'1I_�f;pI - � o r 4 0.0 'tirJ-tFJ--' i i 1 OS GO OS \ 1001. IV9l1ANNd13 I \� \ \ 1 Iafti410t0l610aN I , I � I -- -- I I POOL DECK LEVEL 18M NO 1 r RESIDENTS CLUB LEVEL lzvfllom 19 i A7 M7 MI )ulmA 1e m M2 f eeeMM EAST TOWER (PHASE 1) LEVELS 4600 THRU 4800 LEVELS 4100 THRU 4300 m TYPICAL PENTHOUSE LEVEL 0 10 u aM WEST TOWER (PHASE 2) LEVELS 1100 THRU 4000 TYPICAL RESIDENTI VEL e � AO v In =I f a i METROPOLIS BAYSHORE BAY ASID aff VIEW COMOMdIUASS Io M111111■II■11111■1111 m111111■II■11111■1111 111111■11■11111■ 111711■II■11111■ 111■II■INTI■1111 111■II■11111■1111 1111■II■11111■ 1111■II■UNE 111 11 1 1111111111■II■11111■ 111 11 1 IIII�111111■11■11111■ 111 11 1 II110111MINIMUM 111 11 1 1111111 III■11■11111■ 111 11 1 1111m111111■II■11111■ 111 11 1 1111111111■il■11111■ I _a 1 METROPOLIS BAYSHORE BAY AND CITY VMV CONWUDUUMB MATERIALS LEGEND OVER MASONRY SIANITULTE FAINT FrOR ACCENTCOEORSASINDICATED. F21 D4VCT RESISTANT TDITSD OLAZM N 7MLEMM ALUICIAMPLumm. F3-1 STOM PROOF DRADJABLIR ALUG VM LOUVERS. ALUMDAN RAILING ASSEMBLY RAIL SHALL RE a7• ABOVE FDR91 i RDMANDRBIWACOOF,Cr. NOLEVEL EXTERJORLICRITFIXTI)RE -3"PLEVEL POLUDMI) STOW WALL PANELS. LI [7.1 ROMIG 1COMILANE. 4"LEM 151 FIARD APPLIED -31MLEM RAL(ONYWA71IRPMOOM0 I 1------- L91 :==rvE,=D9Cx 71—_____. 2kvL4mr WATERPROMYOVER WATERR STRLCTURA.L SLAB, 32MLEVEL 10 CEII&M. COMMS AT COVERED LJOOCUAS DI OF METAL M= CLAD WrTH EXTERIOR GRADEGYPOUN 8111JAINIM AIM MOOM CHWEIff PLASTER PROM. ormy AIM LOOO II WALKS OF BRIM PAVERS, II Fv- .:WMAUVATION w Fa miles R7- 1111111111111 mosilloolooll MEMENNI mmmmmml MENNOMI mmmmmml MENNEEN mmommmi NEENEEN MEMENEN METROPOLIS BAYSHORE BAY AIM CITY VIEW CONI)MUNnYMS ------- ----- 7MLEMM TI i NOLEVEL -3"PLEVEL -35MLEVEL 4"LEM -31MLEM I -130PLEVEL 2kvL4mr 32MLEVEL 31MLEMM no LEVEL II MINIM 2M LEM =IIF- 11 MINIM 11 11 ""LEM 25MLEM Mil� II MINIM 11 11 2301ILEVEE 22MLEVEL mmiaa II MMM 11 11 Mil� 11 wilimiiii In# LEVEL miim 11 milimiifi mm- 1780LEVEL -I"OLEVEL Mil� 11 Milimilli bW LEVEL Fmi-111FEIIII Mil� 11 MINIM 11 11 m Mil� 11 Milimll II -IMJWCZUZMNAL FACUBW Mil� 11 MINIM 11 11 Mil� 11 ailla,11,11- Mil� II Mill II 11 Mil� II Firma 11 II Mil� II ailla II II miles II MINIM 11 II Mil� II MINIM II II MIN MINIM 1111 MINII .I UN.. .I I 1111111111111 mosilloolooll MEMENNI mmmmmml MENNOMI mmmmmml MENNEEN mmommmi NEENEEN MEMENEN METROPOLIS BAYSHORE BAY AIM CITY VIEW CONI)MUNnYMS ------- ----- 3- 879 7MLEMM TI i NOLEVEL -3"PLEVEL -35MLEVEL 4"LEM -31MLEM I -130PLEVEL 2kvL4mr 32MLEVEL 31MLEMM no LEVEL 2W LEVEL 2M LEM -2700LEVEL ""LEM 25MLEM -24MLEM 2301ILEVEE 22MLEVEL -21MLEM 2MLEVEE In# LEVEL 18" LEVEL 1780LEVEL -I"OLEVEL Ism LAM bW LEVEL 13M LEVEL -,120LAM 1100LEM, -IMJWCZUZMNAL FACUBW 3- 879 7MLEMM "#LEVEL NOLEVEL 4"LEM 30LEM 2kvL4mr 3- 879 a METROPOLIS BAYSHORE # BAY AIM CrrY VIEW CONDONMVMS ' SUBMITTED INTO 'HE PUBLIC RECORD FOR ITEM z -I ON7-,?q-0,31 PROFESSIONAL RESUME ALAN L. TINTER, P.E., PTOE EDUCATION: University of Bridgeport (MS, Mngmt. Engr, 1981) University of Connecticut (BS, C.E., 1971) PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION: Professional Engineer, Florida, 1979 Professional Engineer, Virginia, 1992 Professional Engineer, Connecticut, 1976 Professional Traffic Operations Engineer, 2002 PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS: Institute of Transportation Engineers (Member) National Society of Professional Engineers American Society of Civil Engineers (Member) Florida Engineering Society PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE: 5/85 -Present TINTER ASSOCIATES, INC. President, Founder and Principal -in -Charge The firm was established to provide transportation expertise to both private and public clients. Services include the preparation of parking and traffic studies; the completion of traffic engineering plans, such as signalization, lighting, channelization, pavement marking and signing plans. Expert testimony is provided for our clients to present findings to governmental agencies, including Planning and Zoning Boards, City Commissions, County Commissions, Administrative Hearings, Courts and other regulatory bodies. 1/81-5/85 CRAVEN, THOMPSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. Vice President Transportation Engineering_ Senior Traffic Engineer Roadway design projects included the Sawgrass Expressway, Royal Palm Boulevard reconstruction in Margate, Wiles Road improvement in Coral Springs and various Broward County Bond projects. Traffic Engineering projects included the design of signal improvements at 156 locations throughout Broward County for incorporation into the Broward County Computerized Signal System, as well as the design of isolated traffic signal installations at more than 50 locations throughout Broward County. Direction and supervision of traffic and parking studies; preparation of traffic operations and parking plans, including geometric, sign and pavement marking designs; preparation of traffic impact studies for both public and private clients. 03- 879 Professional Resume Alan L. Tinter, P.E. Page 2 7/79-12/80 MID SOUTH ENGINEERING COMPANY Principal Traffic Engineer Immediate supervision of Traffic Operations Division personnel; the production of plans and specifications for a variety of traffic operation projects; preparation of traffic impact reports for various developments; completion of studies concerning traffic conditions in downtown areas, including Traffic Circulation Elements for Comprehensive Plans; and involved with data collection, communication analysis and intersection designs for signal system in Hillsborough County. 10/78-6/79 FREDERIC R. HARRIS, INC. Senior Traffic Engineer In charge of major Traffic Operations and Parking Study at West Virginia Medical Center. Author of those portions of the Southwest Connecticut Regional Transportation Study involving 1-95 operational lanes and ramp improvements, and Systems Analysis for U.S. 1. Completed various traffic impact studies and provided expert testimony in the States of Connecticut and New York. 7/75-10/78 TOWN OF GREENWICH, CONNECTICUT Town Traffic Engineer Collection, analysis and interpretation of data needed to measure existing and estimate future traffic characteristics and parking needs; design of traffic and related facilities; and installation and maintenance of regulatory, warning and informational devices on Town roads. Supervised both the traffic signal maintenance crew and the signing and pavement marking crew. Reviewed subdivision and other development plans with regard to traffic design and safety, testifying before Planning and Zoning Commission and in court as required. 6/73-7/75 MORTON S. FINE & ASSOCIATES, INC. Traffic Engineer As consultant to both private and municipal clients, handled varied civil engineering assignments with emphasis on traffic engineering. Collected technical data, such as traffic counts, speed and delay studies and classification counts. Prepared traffic studies, including TOPICS reports and Planning and Zoning Commission reports for diverse developments. Testified before Planning and Zoning Commissions of behalf of clients. Prepared construction plans, estimates and specifications for highway related projects and traffic operations improvements. 6/71-6/73 CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Highway Junior Engineer Assisted in the administration of two federally funded highway programs: TOPICS and Urban Systems. Involved in all phases of dispensing funds from selection of towns to preparation of agreements. July 17, 1997 r ,s NORTHEAST 20TH TERRACE °O Q�d C1 ITT- 1 � 1 I I 1 � I• 1 I ' 1I 1 1 1 1 1 ' } ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ � i O • tl tl O + 1 I } • t t cn f I { 1 I { N 7 ■� 2 DED 1 BED 1 BED 1 BED=BBEAEIA 2 BA 1 BA 1 QA 1 BA 4 OUTPARCEL a } + - (NOT A PART) --- , I � cn I �ralL i I _ i 4,500 S. F. 2 BED 2 BED 1 BED/ 1 BED/ 1 BED+DEN/ 2 BA 2 BA 1 BA 1 BA 1 BA - 1 z BED/ f t - II 2 BA1--- I t r i LAWN - • O V TENNIS COURTS I 1 BED ' • SERVICE ' • � +' t V1 a p • : - -- - -- _- - - -- _... _. _ _ - - ai . , _ AREA i I 1 BA ._ � � �� � I ---19- STORY- APARrMEYr _ -- - BUILDING �� � � I� BISCAYNE BAY 1 BED/1 BA Ii • • G�'i G" V LOADING BAYS MECH./ELEC. HEALTH CLUB Z•1 I' 4 t { 1 - - 00 I OG LEASING I 1fi �Nr cox - -_-� .- - - - D ---- - � ADMINIST. I I ! 1 � } j! � � CLUBROOM LOBBY I r Al } � t - �ti ----`� --� -�- -- B \ I f { - o 1 �- o I — POOL o o a -- - - 1 - -_ ----- i I r , p -- -- -- - TRCOURT —— Vl ♦ _ tl J n d w i �_ I t RETAIL n --- I l `?- c cs rsxrR�Ncg �� � � I I I � � i � �■ ai 12,000 S F '- �-- , T � I LTJ i i� t t _ QQ QQ cc I 7 t- - - - �f - t " ' APARTMENT TYPES NET RENTABLE S FT. 4 LEVEL PARKING GARAGE SERVICE, - j 157 CARS/LEVEL } AREA Q APARTMENT TOWER W - MAIN TOWER 1 BR 102,600 s.f. [] Q 1 BR (DEN) 18,990 s.f. 2 BR 156,492 s.f. — 0 'ERVIC - -- - - .f. f ) � j�j��-� -- 3BR 29,700 s (� AREA TOTAL 3fl7,782 s.f. (1068 S.F./UNIT) 0 GARDEN UNI'T'S 1 BR 48,817 s.f. 1 l i I f { i 1 1 1 1 1 1 O I 1 1 1 v , I 1 � 1 1 1 • � ® M 1 BR (DEN) 4 ,78 s.f. J li a i. .i � } r I _I._ .i✓_._ f . f � 2 BR 45,789 s.f. 0 3 B 15,824 s.f. W Ll L..... _-_- - - - TOTAL 124,138 s.f. (906 S.F./UNIT) >7 � LL NORTHEAST 19TH TERRACE PARKING SPACES r�1� GARDEN BUILDINGS LEVEL 1 123 SPACES LEVEL 2 155 SPACES LEVEL 3 155 SPACES LEVEL 4 177 SPACES TOTAL 610 SPACES (1.44 GARS/UNIT) GROUND LEVEL PLAN 1:30' SCALE UNIT BREAKDOWN &aw,nby: 1 BR 194 = 45% 1 BR (DEN) 31 = 8% d# 216/01 2 BR 170 = 40% TOTAL PROJECT UNITS: 425 UNITS 3 BR 30 = 7% shod II0C A-1 2014 UNIT TYPE IST UNIT TYPE IST 2ND -5TH 8TH -19TH TOTAL UNITS 1BR + 1B - (7 x 4)=28 (7 x 14)=98 126 113R + 1B (DEN) - (1 x 4)=4 (1 x 14)=14 18 2 BR + 2B - (7 x 4)=28 (7 x 14}=98 1?B 3BR + 2B - (1 x 4}=4 (1 x 14)=14 18 TOTAL UNITS: - 64 224 288 UNITS UNIT TYPE IST 2ND -5TH 8TH -19TH TOTAL UNITS 1BR + 1B 8 (15 x •4)=60 - 68 iBK + 1B (DEN) 1 (3 x 4)=12 - 13 2 BR + 2B 4 (10 x 4}=40 - :14 3BR + 2B - (3 x 4)=12 - 12 TOTAL UMTS: 13 124 - 137 UNITS C I T Y O F M I A M I P L A N N I N G A N D Z O N I N G D E P A R T M E N T PRE -APPLICATION DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS CLASS It SPECIAL PZILUIT METROPOLIS 1900 N BAYSIIOIIS DRIVE 02-11-03 The following comments represent the preliminary review of the Pre -Application Design Review Committee, which consists of tell staff member in the Urban Design and Lad Development Division. The Planning and Zoning Department Would like to thank you for your active participation in the pre. Applicaltion Design Review Committee. We look forward to working together with you to ensure that the design of your project is developed to its highest potential. This t olhborative effort will matte the success of your project in contributing to improving the quality of the bullt environment in the City of Miami. Context • There is not enough information about the context. Please attach a complete description of the site and the immediate context, at least three blocks around the project, so that we will be able to provide you with a complete set of comments to ensure die highest quality design for the area Urban Design • To reduce the speed of the vehicles exiting and entering the drop-off area, please narrow the width of die curb cut to a maximum of 1 T. This will eahance the safety and comfort for the pedestriaric • The FEMA waR s>>ag be articulated to add interest for passing pedestrians. Provide numerous breaks and poe>bbk ares- foc social interaction with seating and landscape along this wall. Landscape • Please submit a Liadwape plat that Austratcs the species and location of plant matetiA 'Are palms located near the :fucb " be mpheed with shade trees providing a eontimrom canopy fa the pedestrians. The. dear canopy shall be a minimum of 13' a height to that the canopy will riot interfere with die elevated space above the FEMA waL • Please examine the bm6cape to in$= Is dear view to aid from the park, from say habitable space. • Please be aware that the distance between these two towers can affect the comfort kvd on the recreation area due to an increase in wind speed SUBMITTED INTO THE .PUBLIC RECORD FOR ITEM vz- i ON 7-av-u� i'00 LL£ 'ON 099b9ThS026 •- 9I2 FLQfl 9a3HN3389 T T :ST IJ !7£0i6Z 57 " 07/14/200311:33 3054444986 07/11/2003 18:37 FAX July 11, 2003 Ms. Lllia I: Medina Senior Planner City of Miami - Planning & Zoning Department 444 S.W. 2n° Avenue P.O. Box 330708 Miami, EL 3.3233-0708 DAVID PLLWERANDASSO PAGE 03 ®002/006 Re; MoiropoNs Bayshore Condominium — Second Submittal MUSP TraMc Impact Anal ysla go WOW — W. 0. tt 27 Dear Ms. Medina: We have reviewed the Traffic Impact Analysis report prepared by David Plummer & Associates, Inc. (DPA) for the Metropolis Bayshore Condominium prpject. This is the second time our offite has received a traffic report for this particular project. The report was received by URS directly from DPA on Jury 2, 2003. In addition, as part of the review process., our office has received additional clarifying and/or supplemental information from DPA via fax on July 9, 2003, and July 11, 2003. A copy of the faxed exhibits is attached to this review letter. We have instructed DPA to submit two (2) (sound copies of the revised report to your office, inclusive of all of the updated material, for your use, The proposed development will be located on the corner of N.E. 191" Street / N.E. 4L" Avenue and North Sayshore Drive, adjacent to Biscayne Bay. Construction is estimated to be complete in 2005. The report indicates that the applicant is proposing to bulld %52 condominium units, 4,635 square feet of office space: and a 3,835 -square - foot restaurant. Our findings are as follows: I. General Location Map; The report includes a location map Identifying the location of the project and the surrounding street network (Exhibit 1). 2. Study Area. As agreed upon previously, the study area boundaries are N.E. 235 Street to the north, N.E. 151h Street to the south, N.E. 2"d Avenue to the west, and Biscayne Bay to the east. Also as agreed upon previously, roadway link capacity analyses were performed for three segments of Biscayne Boulevard, at the three signalized intersections of N.E. 19"' Street with N.W. 2 I Avenue, N.E. 19 Street with Biscayne Boulevard, and N.E_ 17'^ Terrace with Biscayne Boulevard, and at the unsignalized intersection of N.E, 17"' Terrace with North Sayshore Drive. URS eeroaatic" lateshora Cnmpax 5100 V140 33►d Auonw, Sulte ISO ion i,;r.,derdaue. OL 13100437S Td: 961.779.18111 pig'. 95,.739.1189 SUBMITTEDATO THE PUBLIC RECORD FOR ITEMON7 -a I/ - 6,3. AR_ S79 07/14/2003 11:33 3054444986 ()7.111/2003 18:97 F'A►I DAVID PLLWERANDASSO PAGE 04 11001rooe IAe. LINA ! M�dins A&VOWMA e0yfhore CmX11*Mj ij—-Traf$c Impact An*sie Rwiaw - 8*mmi Submittal July 11. 21103 Page 2 or 0 3. Site Access: The primary access to the site is proposed via a two-way driveway onto North Sayshore Drive. A secondary service drive is located along the aliey adjacent to the west side of the property. A pick-up/drop-off valet area Is Iccated on the north side of the site. A -Access to the garage will be controlled by a gatelcard readeir system, in addition to the valet services provided. Queuing and stacKing analyses of /f these two systems were performed and indicate that adequate on-site operations are anticipated. 4. Traffic counts: Two-hour turning movement counts and 24-hour directional counts were collected at the study intersections and segments. The data were collected on Wednesday, June 4. 2003 and are provided in the report. 5. Adjustment Factors. Given the dates of the data collection, we concur with the peak season adjustment factor of 1.04. A 5% multimodal split for transit has been used lin conjunction with a 1% internalization factor. Given the proposed mixed use of the site and the location of the project, both of these factors are acceptable. 6. Capacity Analysis: An existing level of service analysis of the study segments and intersections were performed. We agree with the use of HCS2000 for boat the signalized and unsignalized Intersection analyses. We agree with the use of service volume thresholds from the FOOT for the segment capacity analyses., Existing signal timing data from Miami Dade County have also been provided. For the PM peak period analyses, all of the intersectlons operate at levet of service (LOS) B under existing conditions. All of the study segments on Biscayne Boulevard operate at LOS D and the segment of N.E. 19th Street operates at LOS C, under existing conditions. 7- Planned Roadway Improvements; The 2003 TIP and the 2025 LRE were reviewed for planned or programmed roadway improvements within the study area. No projects that increase capacity were listed within the study area. However, one roadway project, opening a segment of North 9ayshore Drive between N.E. 190' Street and N.E. 20th Terrace, Is within the study area. Is expected to be complete before the build out of this project, and will impact Capacity and travel patterns in the area. The effects of this project, assoclated with the Finger Companies Biscayne Bay Village project, have been incorpgra?ed Into tho future conditions analyses. 9 _tl it €�,d ln�'pe e public br}yc� vv i pnsdrla A. 'Thompson City Clerk 03- 879 07/14/2003 11:33 3054444986 DAVID PLLMERANDASSS PAGE 05 Q004/006 07!11/2001 16:37 FAX Ms. Lpe I. fNedlna lUebot+offs asyshore CondomimWnt . Traffic impact Anis Review - Second SuemittN Juty 11, 21?03 Page 7 of 5 e. 13a6kground Traffic: A two -percent background growth rate was applied to account for future growth of un -identified developments in the area. This percentage was conservatively selected consistent with other studies in the area. We agree that a two -percent growth rate is reasonable. 9_ Committed Developments: Nine additional major projects have been identified within the area. including the Biscayne Bay Village project. The list of projects was provided by the City and the associated trips from each of them are provided In the report. Future volumes for the projects were projected for the build out year of this project and included in the future conditions analyses, which consider the effects of the new segment on North Dayshore Drive. Io, Trip Generation: The trip generation for the proposed sits is from the most current edition of the ITE Trip Generation manual. ITE Land Use Code 232 — Condominium. LUC 710 — Office, and LUC 631 -- Restaurant were used to generate trips for the project site. We agree with the use of these LUC's. in addition, LUC 252 — Congregate Care Facility with 120 dwelling units was used to generate 'potential existing site' trips to be added to the background traffic and credited against the proposed sits trips. There is no additional information about the 'existing land use', however the report also claims that the site has been vacant for over the past two years. This trip generation application arose from a misunderstanding in the methodology, and as such, its application in this particular Instance will not be further questioned. The effects of this application were both added and subtracted to the analyses, effectively zero. The proposed project is estimated to generate a total of 410 PM peak - hour trips. This was reduced to 387 PM peak -hour trips, after internalization and multimodal factors were applied. In addition, accounting for the misunderstanding of the 'existing land use', the proposed project is estimated to have 368 PM net new peak -hour trips. 11. Trip Distribution: The project is located within now TAZ 505. The cardinal distribution far TAZ 505 obtained from Miaml-Dade County is used to distribute the traffic. We agree with the application of the trip distribution and assignment_ 12. Future Conditions with Project: The methodology for determining future peak hour volumes with project, link LOS, and intersection LOS Is consistent with the rest of the report. Under future conditions with project, all Inks and intersections are expected to operate acceptably, at LOS C or 03- 879 rC, itelr2,..__ rvf'E �1 z i y.'i on (;2dy Clerk 03- 879 07/14/2003 11:33 3054444986 Oq�ll/1007 18:38 FAX DAVID PLUMMERANDASSO PAGE e6 i&005/008 M& 0111 t Medina weMeteris Neyana. Coo doe Inium - T1040Impact A"Pte Review — Second &AW4 til July 11, 2009 Peg& 4 d 5 better. Recognizing that the subject project and adjacent recent projects aro expected to have a noticeable effect on the surrounding signalized intersections, a further analysis was performed considering changes to the signal timing and phasing under future volume conditions. In particular, Increasing the green time for the southbound left tum movement at Biscayne Boulevard with N.E. 19th Street and the westbound left turn movement at Biscayne Boulevard with N.E. 170' Terrace affords significant improvements to the LOS of those movements. In addition to analyzing the study links and intersections under future volume conditions, conditions at the proposed driveways were reviewed. Pinject trip distribution at the driveways is provided in the report. Both the garage entrance and the valet service are expected to operelle soveplW*. Finally, a traffic control measures plan wail _included .in Ahe _ANXxt. M,jw indication was given as to the number of parking spaces In oa a ilg __it isour under nding t}rat-- City-- C requirements havta been met and in addition. the development is zommitted to reducing vehicular traffic volumes, vie a variety of methods, including encouragement of ridesharing and mass transit. We conclude that the traffic report, along with the supplemental information provided, adequately addresses the trMc issues. SADWd you have any questions, please tali me at 954.739.1881 extension 223. Sincerely, URS Corporation Southern /jenn L, King, P.E. Senior Transportation Engineer c¢: Ramon Aiywez (DPA) auachrrienls y.{st 2 Ed5 c4l1.�a�4 1'l rh«iCi° F�av'i�dffi�rt Cls Clerk 03- 879 07/14/2003 11:33 3054444986 DAVID PLUMMERANDASSO PAGE 07 07',11%2oo3 18:38 FAX Me, LHtp 1- Medina MetmpoOs smhor'e cooftmiewm - Tn►MIC Impact Arstysia RVAOW - 56W4 Gubmiltd July 11, 2UO3 Pepe 5 o1 S REVIEW LETTER ATTACHMENT SUMMARY This is a summary of the attachments, which are sheets that update the bound report originally submitted by DPA. We have instructed DPA to provide revised, updated, bound, complete reports to the City. The revised report will have the following: 1. Revised Exhibit 2 - Page 6 - 2003 PM Peak Vc!urnes 2. Revised Exhibit 4 - Page 9 - 2003 Link Capacity Analysis 3. Revised Exhibit 6 - Pape 13 - Future Volumes Without Project 4. Revised Exhibit 11 - Page 17 - Future Link Capacity Analysis With Project 5. Revised Exhibit 10 - Page 18 - Future Volumes With Project S. Revised Exhibit 19 - Page 19 - Future Intersection Capacity Analysis With Project 7. Revised Turning Movement Count Tables (4 shoots) - Appendix 0 - Adjusted f:4unt9 S. HCS Analyses - Complete Replacement of Appendix 0 - Existing Conditions 9, HCS Analyses - Complete Replacement of Appendix D - Future With Project 10, HCS Analyses - Complete Replacement of Appendix D - Future With Project With Improvements 11. Revised - Miramar Centre Phases II and III (Figure S) and The 1800 Club (Figure 8) - Appendix E - Committed Development Information 12. Revised Exhibit - Appendix E - Project Access 13. Revised Future Intersection Volume Determination Tables (4 sheets) - Appendix E -Volume Matrices 14. Newly Added Exhibit - Future Link Volume Determination Table (1 sheet) -- Add to Appendix E - Volume Matrices 16, Revised Queuing Methodology -- Appendix F - Stacking and Queuing at Parking Garage sutm F-� itern Pa City Clerk 03- 879 Dear City Comm:ssioners, As citizens with an interest in the proper deveiopment of the Biscayre Arts Quarter (the area bounded by Biscayne Bay on the east, I-395 to the South, I-195 to the north and NW 211 Avenue to the west) we ask that the Miami City Commission approve the Major Use Special Permit requested by Terra Adi International for their project - Metropolis flayshore (Quantum Residential Condominium) - to be constructed at Northeast 19" Street and No. Sayshore Drive. The proposed development will provide many of the high quality arta affordable residential units needed to continue the trend of making downtown Miami a 24-hour city, and its many amenities will be an asset to the nelghborhood. Terra management has reached out to the community and is committed to promoting the area as a whole by fostering culture, art and entertainment in and around the neighborhood. The company has made every effort to ensure that its project enhances urban living in Miami. We urge you to approve their application. Thank yoL for your consideration. Respectfully, !S Names , 03- 879 Jul 24 oa 05iO4p � Savings Propertyy mana9ement� July 24, 2003 To; City of Miami Cvuvnis�ioncrs Ref: MrAmpolis Bray Tower, Tara ADI. Inc. Dear Commissioners, My name is Mr. Wilton and 1 Ain the owner of Porta Di Oro, located at 479 ME 30"' Street. Z would like to exprem my supp(m in reference to the Metropolis Bay Tower. It is our belief that this project will be a great asset to the community for the revitalization of the downtown area. With tho ongoing work at the Downtown Perfonning Arts Canter, it is quite clear that the city is moving forward with the rejuvenation of this neighborhoold. We believe that the Metropolis Bay Tower project falls in line with the long -terra vision for the City of Miami downtown arca. We nrgr the city commissioners to rule in favor of this project_ Sincerely yours, 4aotr an Partner AWdq P.2 3711 S.W. ?7th Street s Miorni, Fioeicio 33134 • Phone (3051444.8326 -Fox (305) 444-9642 03- 879 Jul 24 03 05:03a 1 F.I.R.S.T. INC. 305-q734751 OMNI ADVISORY BOARD ' 1 1 l( IILH OAB Progressive Leadership CHARTER MEMBERS FRED JOSEPH PRESIDENT STANLEY KRIEGER VICE PRESIDENT DR_ RON CANTWELL VICE PRESIDENT OLGA GUILARTE TREASURER ELEANOR KLUGER PAST PRESIDENT DIRECTORS PATRICIA CARBONELL JORGE ESPINEL ROLAND HOWELL JUAN ROMERO CAROLE ANN TAYLOR MEMBERS: RICHARD HAYLOR JULIE GRIMES LUIZ MELD CRISTA SCHMIDT 1633 NORTH BAYSHORE DRIVE MIAMI, FLORIDA 33132 (305) 579-9068 FAX (305) 373-4751 E-MAIL fredioseph@bellsouth.net July 23, 2003 Honorable City Commissioners City Hall 500 Pan American Drive Miami, Florida 33133 Dear City Commissioners: The Omni Advisory Board Inc -it's Officers, Directors, and Members offer our unanimous support for the Terra Developers project "Quantum on the Bay". The principals of this organization have displayed a genuine interest in becoming an asset to the Omni Neighborhood. We are excited about the new development and are especially pleased with the personal involvement of the developers. We feel that they are truly interested in working to bring about a New Revitalized Omni Area. Thank you very much for your time. Respectfully, r h Omni Advisory Board Inc, President p.2 93- 879 Jul 24 03 05:03a F.I.R.S.T. INC. 3053734751 P.3 rah Cordonleiem A"eciefiee, lee. 1717 North Bayshoro Drive • Miami, Florida 33132-1149 Telephone: (3051 374-2822 May 29, 2003 Honorable City Commissioners City Hall 500 Pan American Drive Miami, Florida 33133 Dear City Commissioners: The Grand Condominium Association, 1717 North Bayshore Drive, supports the major use Special permit requested by Tera ADI International for their project "Metropolis at Bayshore." Our Association represents 810 Residential Condominium Units, 152 Hotel Rooms and 100,000 sq.ft. of Retail space. Our annual tax base is approximately $175 million. There are several hundred registered voters in our building. Please fmd attached resolution espousing our support of this project. Sincerely, Ron Samter Board of Directors, President 42 itern City Clerk 03- 879 Jul 24 03 05:03a F.I.R.S.T. INC. 3059734751 p.4 Con4lowfulum Association, Inc. 1717 North Baysbaro Drive • Miami, Florida 33132-1148 T*Iophon*: (305) 374-2822 To: Board of Directors ff From: Brendan Grubb 9151� Date: May 30, 2003 Re: Attached Letters The Attached letters represent The Grand Condominium Association Board of Directors support for a new neighborhood project/development. Please indicate below your approval/disapproval Ron Sainter, President Adele Neumann, Vice President Julie Grimes, Treasurer Fred Joseph, Secretary Rick Kalwani, Director Robert Lacle, Director Julian Linares, Director 41 Disapproval n Ch"'Y Clerk 03- 879 Jul 24 03 05:03a F.I.R.S.T. INC. 305:734751 p,5 Condominium Association, Inc. 1717 HerNh Bayshoro Drive • Miami, Florida 33132-1148 Telephone.- (305) 374-2822 May 28, 2003 Dear City Commissioners, As citizens with an interest in the proper development of the Biscayne Arts Quarter (the area bounded by Biscayne Bay on the east, I-395 to the south, 1-195 to the north and NW 2nd Avenue to the west) we ask that the Miami City Commission approve the Major Use Special Permit requested by Terra -ADI International for their project - Metropolis at Bayshore (Quantum Residential Condominium) - to be constructed at Northeast 19th Street and No. Bayshore Drive. The proposed development will provide many of the high quality and affordable residential units needed to continue the trend of making downtown Miami a 24-hour city, and its many amenities will be an asset to the neighborhood. Terra management has reached out to the community and is committed to promoting the area as a whole by fostering culture, art and entertainment in and around the neighborhood. The company has made every effort to ensure that its project enhances urban living in Miami. We urge you to approve their application. Thank you for your consideration. Ron Samter Board of Directors, President 43 PriscM a AK CAY Clerk 03- 879 GIBBS & WISS A PARTNERSHIP OF PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS 215 GRAND AVENUE P.O. Box 1050 COCONUT GROVE, FLORIDA 33133 TELEPHONE (305) 448-8486 FACSIMILE (305) 448-0773 W. TUCKER GIBBS ILONA-ANNE WISS July 24, 2003 Honorable Johnny Winton, Chairman, Honorable City Commissioners, City of Miami 3500 Pan American Drive Miami, FL 33133 Dear Chairman Winton and City Commissioners: I represent the 1800 - Club, Ltd., the owner of the property at 1800 North Bayshore Drive in Miami. The owner has reviewed the application made by its neighbor, Terra- Adi International Bayshore, LLC for a Major Use Special Permit for the property at 1852-1900 North Bayshore Drive. After this review and meeting with representatives of Terra-Adi, the 1800 - Club has agreed to support the application. Sincerely, N,�'�` W. Tucke Gibbs cc: 1800 Club, Ltd. SUBMITTED INTO THE PUBLIC RECORD FOR ITEM Vz-i ON 7-a q _o3 03- 879 METROPOLIS AT BAYSHORE MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT PREPARED BY: JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. FUSTER DESIGN ASSOCIATES, P.A. GREENBERG TRAURIG, P.A. NICHOLS, BROSCH, SANDOVAL & ASSOCIATES, INC. SHARPTON, BRUNSON & COMPANY VSN ENGINEERING, INC. MAY 2003 Subrr,;itted Into the public r g � w'th 03- 879 City Clerk v METROPOLIS AT BAYSHORE MIAMI, FLORIDA Submitted Into the pubH6 record in connectio D item 22 -L_on Priscilla A. Thompson City Clerk jJ3. 879 I. II. MAY 2003 METROPOLIS AT BAYSHORE MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT TABLE OF CONTENTS PROJECT INFORMATION A. LETTER OF INTENT B. APPLICATION FOR MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT C. ZONING WRITE-UP D. ZONING ATLAS E. PROJECT DATA SHEET F. DEED/COMPUTER TAX PRINTOUT G. OWNERSFJP LIST 500 FEET H. STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF STATE DOCUMENT I. DIRECTORY OF PROJECT PRINCIPALS PROJECT DESCRIPTION A. ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 11000 1. SECTION 1304.2.1 APPLICATION FORMS; SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS 2. SECTION 1702.2.1 GENERAL REPORT 3. SECTION 1702.2.2 MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT CONCEPT PLAN 4. SECTION 1702.2.3 DEVELOPMENTAL IMPACT STUDY III. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS TAB 1 MINORITY CONSTRUCTION EMPLOYMENT PLAN TAB 2 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TAB 3 SITE UTILITY STUDYPrisu Aka A. �ho public City berk 03- 870 TAB 4 ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY TAB 5 SURVEY OF PROPERTY TAB 6 DRAWINGS SUBMITTED 03- 879 METROPOLIS AT BAYSHORE MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT PROJECT INFORMATION ARTICLE I. PROJECT INFORMATION A. LETTER OF INTENT B. APPLICATION FOR MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT C. ZONING WRITE-UP D. ZONING ATLAS E. PROJECT DATA SHEET F. DEED/COMPUTER TAX PRINTOUT G. OWNERSHIP LIST SOO FEET H. STATE OF FLORIDA/DEPARTMENT OF STATE DOCUMENT I. DIRECTORY OF PROJECT PRINCIPALS n public e, E z S y4.. City Clerk o3- 879 HNKH I B fl U fl I G Lucia A. Dougherty (305) 579-0603 E -Mail: doughertyl@gtlaw.com May 6, 2003 Ms. Teresita Fernandez Clerk, Hearing Boards City of Miami 444 S.W. 2nd Avenue 7th Floor Miami, Florida 33130 Re: Letter of Intent for Metropolis at Bayshore, 1852-1900 N. Bayshore Drive, Miami, Florida Dear Ms. Fernandez: On behalf of the property owner Terra-Adi International Bayshore, LLC, we are submitting a Major Use Special Permit ("MUSP") application for approval of a mixed use phased development consisting of two (2) towers with a total of 752 units pursuant to Article 17, Section (1) and (7) of th, Zoning Ordinance and approximately 8,470 square feet of commercial area. This development is not seeking any additional Floor Area Ratio ("FAR') through bonuses, nor is it requesting any variances of the Zoning Ordinance. Should you have any questions, please call me at (305) 579-0603. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, Lucia A. ougherty cc: Pedro Martin, Esq. h��s `- �h- ubliC Mr. David Martin � I €•' •r °� t' Mr. Roberto Moreira Gloria M. Velazquez, Esq. 1'z -1 77 \\MIA-SRVOI\VELAZQUEZG\1455457v01\V71D01!.DOC\3/25/03 City dark GREENBERG TRAURIG, P.A. 1221 BRICKELL AVENUE MIAMI, FLORIDA 33131 r.879 305-579-0500 FAX 305-579-0717 www.gtlaw.com MIAMI NEw YORK WASIIINGTON, D.C. ATLANTA PHILADELPHIA TYSONS CORNER CHICAGO BOSTON PHOENIX WILMINGTON LOS ANGELES DENVER FORT LAUDERDALE BOCA RATON WEST PALM BEACH ORLANDO TALLAHASSEE PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT HEARING BOARDS DIVISION 444 SW 2nd Avenue, 7"' Floor • Miami, Florida 33130 Telephone 305-416-1480 • Fax 305-416-2035 F W g <itli J APPLICATION FOR NOV MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT City Clerk IT IS INTENDED THAT MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMITS BE REQUIRED WHERE SPECIFIED USES AND/OR OCCUPANCIES INVOLVE MATTERS DEEMED TO BE OF CITYWIDE OR AREA -WIDE IMPORTANCE. THE CITY COMMISSION SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR DETERMINATIONS ON' APPLICATIONS FOR MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMITS. (SEE ARTICLE 17 OF ORDINANCE 11000, AS AMENDED, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA.) THE DIRECTOR OF THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING SHALL MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS ON ALL APPLICATIONS FOR MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMITS AND FOR ANY AMENDMENTS THERETO AND SHALL TRANSMIT SAID APPLICATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD FOR ITS RECOMMENDATIONS AND MAY MAKE REFERRALS TO OTHER AGENCIES, BODIES, OR OFFICERS FOR REVIEW, ANALYSIS, AND/OR TECHNICAL FINDINGS AND DETERMINATIONS AND REPORTS THEREON. (SEE SECTION 1301.4 OF ORDINANCE 11000, AS AMENDED, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA.) ANY PERSON WHO RECEIVES COMPENSATION, REMUNERATION OR EXPENSES FOR CONDUCTING LOBBYING ACTIVITIES TO REGISTER AS A LOBBYIST WITH THE CITY CLERK, PRIOR TO ENGAGING IN LOBBYING ACTIVITIES BEFORE CITY STAFF, BOARDS, COMMITTEES AND THE CITY COMMISSION. A COPY OF SAID ORDINANCE IS AVAILABLE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK (MIAMI CITY HALL), LOCATED AT 3500 PAN AMERICAN DRIVE, MIAMI, FLORIDA, 33133. APPLICANTS ARE RESPONSIBLE, IF NEEDED, TO BRING AN INTERPRETER FOR THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE TO ANY PRESENTATION BEFORE CITY BOARDS, COMMITTEES AND THE CITY COMMISSION. POWER OF ATTORNEY WILL BE REQUIRED IF NEITHER APPLICANT OR LEGAL COUNSEL REPRESENTING THE APPLICANT EXECUTE THE APPLICATION OR DESIRE TO MAKE A PRESENTATION BEFORE CITY BOARDS, COMMITTEES AND THE CITY COMMISSION. I, Lucia A. Dougherty, on behalf of Terra-Adi International, LLC, hereby apply to the Director of the Planning and Zoning Department of the City of Miami for approval of a Major Use Special Permit under the provisions of Article 17 of the City of Miami Zoning Ordinance. Property Address: 1852 and 1900 North Bayshore Drive, Miami, Florida Nature of proposed use (be specific): A Major Use Special Permit approval for a minted use phased development consisting of two (2) towers with a total of 752 units and approximately 8,470 square feet of commercial area. 1. Two 11x17" original current surveys and one 24x36" original survey, prepared by a State of Florida Registered Land Surveyor within six months from the date of application. 2. Two 11x17' original plans and one 24x36" original plan, signed and sealed by a State of Florida Registered Architect or Engineer showing property boundaries, existing (if any) and proposed structure(s), parking, landscaping, etc.; building elevations and dimensions and computations of lot area and building spacing. 3. Plans need to be stamped by the Hearing Boards Division first and then signed by Public Works, Zoning and Planning prior to submission of application. 03 3 Rev. 06/04/02 F 4. Affidavit and disclosure of ownership of subject property and disclosure of interest (see attached forms). 5. Certified list of owners of real estate within a 500 -feet radius from the outside boundary of property (see pages 5 and 6). 6. At least two photographs that show the entire property (land and improvements). 7. Maps showing the existing zoning designation and the adopted comprehensive plan designation for areas on and around the property. 8. General location map showing relation to the site or activity to major streets, schools, existing utilities, shopping areas, important physical features in and adjoining the project, and the like. 9. Concept Plan: a) Site plan and relevant information per Section 1304.2.1d -h in Zoning Ordinance 11000, as amended. b) Relationships to surrounding existing and proposed uses and activities, systems and facilities, per Section 1702.2.2a in Zoning Ordinance 11000, as amended. c) How concept affects existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan principles and designations; tabulation of any required variances, special permits, changes of zoning or exemptions, per Section 1702.2.2b in Zoning Ordinance 11000, as amended. 10. Developmental Impact Study (an application for development approval for a Development of Regional Impact may substitute). 11. Other (specify and attach cover letter explaining why any document you are attaching is pertinent to this application). 12. An 8 %2 x 11" copy of all exhibits that will be presented at the hearing. 13. Twenty-five (25) "Major Use Special Permit" books containing the above information. If this project requires Zoning Board approval, a total of thirty-five (35) books will be required. 14. Cost of processing according to the City Code: a) $ 45,000 , for the Major Use Special Permit, plus $1,150 advertising surcharge b) Additional fee of $ -Q, for any required special permits, changes of zoning or variances and land use amendment (Rezoning: $ -0- and CDMP.: $ -0-); Mailing Notice Fee: $483.00. c) Total Fee: $ 46,633.00 15. Is the property within the boundaries of a historic site, historic district or archeological zone designated pursuant to Chapter 23 of the Miami City Code? No. 16. Is the property within the boundaries of an Environmental Preservation District designated pursuant to Chapter 23 of the Miami City Code? No. 17. What is the purpose of this Major Use Special Permit? development pursuant to Article 17. Rev. 06/04/02 2 Approval of a mixed use phased rho pt1blV 4 Rth R � b ,..,, m#o, 1 City Berk ,) 3 — 879 Signature 1�9 Name Lucia A. Dougherty Address 1221 BrickeH Avenue Miami, Florida 33131 Telephone (305)579-0603 Date May 6, 2003 the publi r��f... n < 6th Rev. 06/04/02 03- 879 3 STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2003, by Lucia A. Douaherty who is an Individual personally known to me or who has produced as identification and who did (did not) take an oath. (Stamp) Signature STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 20 , by , day of of a corporation, on behalf of the corporation. He/She is personally known to me or has produced as identification and who did (did not) take an oath. (Stamp) Signature STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20 , by partner (or agent) on behalf of , a partnership. He/She is personally known to me or who has produced as identification and who did (did not) take an oath. (Stamp) Rev. 06/04/02 4 Signature 'W'hbspublid on 1J3- 879 MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT OWNER'S LIST Owner's Name Terra-Adi International Bayshore, LLC Mailing Address 1852 and 1900 North Bayshore Drive, Miami, Florida Telephone Number 3054164556 Legal Description: See Attached Exhibit "A" Owner's Name Mailing Address Zip Code Telephone Number Legal Description: Owner's Name Mailing Address Zip Code Telephone Number Legal Description: Any other real estate property owned individually, jointly, or severally (by corporation, partnership or privately) within 500 feet of the subject site is listed as follows: Street Address Legal Description Submitted 1 *a " public iter( Giiy Clerk Rev. 06/04/02 93- 879 5 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 1. 4 and 5. Block 7. of MIRAMAR THIRD AMENDED SUBDIVISION, according to the map or plot thereof, as recorded in Plot Book 5. Page 4. of the Public Records of Miami—Dade County. Florida. Siij-, .*7 t%., Into the public n vvith rcl iA. City Clerk 03- 879 MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT DISCLOSURE OF OWNERSHIP 1. Legal description and street address of subject real property: 1852 and 1900 North Bayshore Drive, Miami, Florida 01-3231-003-0530 01-3231-000-0510 Lots 1, 4 and 5, Block 7 of MIRAMAR THIRD AMENDED SUBDIVISION, according to the map or plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 5, Page 4 of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida. 2. Owner(s) of subject real property and percentage of ownership. Note: The Code of the City of Miami requires disclosure of all parties having a financial interest, either direct or indirect, in the subject matter of a presentation, request or petition to the City Commission. Accordingly, question #2 requires disclosure of shareholders of corporations, beneficiaries of trusts, and/or any other interested parties, together with their addresses and proportionate interest. See attached Exhibit B 3. Legal description and street address of any real property (a) owned by any party listed in answer to question #2, and (b) located within 500 feet of the subject real property. None Lucia A. Doueherty Owner or Attorney for Owner Name Signature STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE (A Owner or Attorney for Ownr Submitted Inn t�le public MR p� ,.� �;.r'Ite'd�Je��dn City Clerk The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this o day of 2003, by Lucia A. Doul4herty individually. He/She is .pgLsonally known to me or who has produced as identification and who did (did not) take an oath. Mtizr.IAM P -E , NOTARYur'yccoo�l.C�re_�cF (Stamp) :sor; �. hMISRXINIr"tp To". ya . fn }v Rev. 06104/02 7 Signature 03 _ 879 EXHIBIT B Dated April 2, 2003 TERRA -ADI INTERNATIONAL BAYSHORE, LLC OWNERSHIP SCHEDULE 1. ADI Investment Bayshore, Inc. Raimundo Onetto 14% Jorge Rosenblut 14% Ignacio Hernandez 14% 2. Gallina Dale Corporation (26.75%)' Hugo Hoffman 6.68% 3. Winford Holdings Florida, Inc. 6.69% Maria Elena Celedon 6.69% 4. Terra -ADI International Management, LLC A. Terra International Holdings, LLC 26.75% Pedro A. Martin 17.83% Jorge Lamadrid 8.92% B. Archiplan Development Dadeland; Inc. (26.75%)' Raimundo Onetto 6.68% Jorge Rosenblut 6.69% Ignacio Hernandez 6.69% Patricio Kreutzberger 6.69% 42° 3.5% 53.5° 100% Total publ!6 0.3 l6 W2 S -)Son City Clerk �-� 879 METROPOLIS AT BAYSHORE 1852 —1900 N. BAYSHORE DRIVE MIAMI, FLORIDA MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 17, Section 1701(1) for development of 752 residential units. MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 17, Section 1701(7) for parking structure of 848 parking spaces. The Major Use encompasses the following special permits: CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 6, Section 606.3.1, for development of new construction within the Special District. CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 6, Section 606.3.1, for a temporary construction fence and covered walkway. CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9 to allow a reduction in the size of loading berths. CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 906.6, for active outdoor recreational facilities (including swimming pools). CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 918.2 to permit staging and parking during construction. CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 925.3.8, to allow development/construction/rental signage. CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 917.1.2, to allow valet parking for residential use. CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 920.1, to allow a construction trailer and other temporary office uses such as leasing and sales. CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Section 915.2 for FAA clearance letter. Designation as a phased development pursuant to Section 2502 of Ordinance No. 11000. McPhee Zoning Administrator 1-0 Date f- 879 I i �INS 06JOWN 1.. a �� �i����• rico-a �itias 0 iO� 1=1 lur mm _ Ok _ _R rte. >r �. ��� , zoo AR ni I CITY um FK mw MCI" ON ,.. n a. a c e s © � o.. � �m ��� �r�v o 0 X- _wmw all p�q! am i tomeig- all � � ®dee er � ®u - � ®tee �.�� :�� �, . r• �a ' �' r�� p� ig liga 4 _m 3111i Pw &OEM In WO111101111111 mr.4m IMAM 1= 1®� ®WN �' chi® �tfilfE3 3a!►r.'� � �. ®® ■f® 10i� ' ..�, `� ''� !'� ®O 9f*^ Phi � �s� 15T3" � .; .� Fit OLIT-tij of �C1TY OF,� ANA GELABERT-SANCHEZ F Director d n u October 28, 2002 Greenberg Traurig C/o Adrienne Pardo 1221 Brickell Avenue Miami, FL 33131 Re: 1852 N Bayshore Drive 01-3231-003-0530 1900 N Bayshore Drive 01-3231-003-0510 Dear Ms. Pardo: Pursuant to your letter dated October 24, 2002, concerning the above mentioned properties, please be advised of the following. The current zoning designation of the sites is SD -6 (Central Commercial -Residential Districts). The SD -6 zoning designation allows as a permitted principal use, retail and service establishments, restaurants, art galleries, museums and in locations other than the ground floor frontage of pedestrian streets, offices, hotels, multifamily dwelling units and banks Research of our Certificate of Use records indicates no records on file for the aforementioned sites. Information on any issued or pending zoning violations must be obtained from the Wynwood/Edgewater NET Service Center office at (305) 579-6931. For your benefit, I am enclosing the SD -6 zoning regulations of the properties. If further zoning information is required on this matter, please contact our zoning information counter at 416-1499. Very truly yours, VJ� for Juan C. Gonzalez, Zoning Administrator JCG: er CARLOS A. GIMENEZ City Manager dlubm"Ifl¢r;9,r`g I ito the publ d ,, Ith VY e� City Clerk Cc: Ana Gelabert-Sanchez, Director Planning and Zoning Department Zoning file 03- 879 PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 444 S.W. 2nd Avenue, 3rd Floor/Miami, Florida 33130/(305) 416-1400/Telecopier: (305) 416-2156 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 330708/Miami. Florida 33?1'4-07n J-02-047 1/16/02 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE MIAMI CITY COMMISSION, WITH ATTACHMENT, AMENDING PAGE NO. 23 OF THE ZONING ATLAS OF ORDINANCE NO. 11000, AS AMENDED, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, ARTICLE 4, SECTION 401, SCHEDULE OF DISTRICT REGULATIONS, BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION FROM R-4 "MULTIFAMILY HIGH-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL" TO SD -6 "CENTRAL COMMERCIAL -RESIDENTIAL" DISTRICC FOR THE PROPERTIES LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY 1652 AND 1900 NORTH BAYSHORE DRIVE, MIAMI, FLORIDA, AS LEGALLY DESCRIBED ON ATTACHED "EXHIBIT At; CONTAINING A REPEALER PROVISION, A 'SEVERABILITY CLAUSE, AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Miami Zoning Board, at its meeting of December 03, 2001, Item Ne. 5, following an advertised hearing, adopted Resolution No. ZB 2001-0483, by an eight to one (8 to 1) vote, thus constituting a RECOMMENbATION OF APPROVAL for a change of zoning classification, as hereinafter set forth; and WHEREAS, the City Commission, after careful consideration of this matter, .and the recommendation of the zoning board, deems. it advisable and in the best interest of the general welfare of the City of Miami and its inhabitants to grant this change of zoning c:assification as hereinafter set forth; a fl:71.G the publV tvith -03 rnpson No City Clerk 12 19'; 03- 879 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. The Zoning Atlas of Ordinance No. 11000, as amended, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, Article 4, Secti:5n 401, Schedule of District Regulations, is amended by changing the zoning classification from R-4 Multifamily High -Density Residential to SD -6 Central Commercial - Residential Disrricts for the properties located at approximately 1852 and 1900 North Bayshore Drive, Miami, Florida, as legally described in attached "Exhibit A." Section 2. It is found that this zoning classification change: (a) is in conformity with the adopted Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan; (b) is not contrary to the established land use pattern; (c) will not. create an isolated district unrelated to. adjacent and nearby districts; (d) is not out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the C1ty; .�,� ��, he public' Viz. -I ",p�SOrI3 t' Page 2 of City Clerk 5 12194- 03- 879 (e) will trot materially alter the population density pattens or increase or overtax the load on public facilities such as schools, utilities, streets, etc.; (f) is nec&ssary due to changed or changing conditions; (g) will not adversely influence living conditions in the neighbcrhood; (h) will riot create or excessively increase traffic congestion or otherwise affect public safety; (i) will not create a drainage problem; (j) will not seriously reduce light and air to adjacent area; (k) will not adversely affect property value in the adjacent. area; (�) will not be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accord with existing regulations; and (m) will not. constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner so as to compromise the protection of the public welfare. Section 3. Page No. 23 of the Zoning Atlas, made a part of Ordinance No. 11000, as amended, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, by reference and description in said Page 3 of 5 124�i r i h tea. F2 03 0)3 _ 8'7 9City Clerk ordinance, is amended to reflect the changes made necessary by this Amendment. Section 4. All ordinances or parts of ordinances insofar as they are inconsistent or in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance are repealed. Section S. If any section, part of section, paragraph, clause, phrase, or word of this Ordinance is declared invalid, the remaining provisions of this Ordinance shall not be affected. Section 6. This ordinance shall become effective thirty-one (31) days after second reading and adoption thereof pursuant and subject to § 163.3187(3)(c).11 PASSED ON FIRST READING BY TITLE ONLY this 4th day of January , 2002. nA') the, public vifth -W_. Q pson city Clerk 3� This ordinance shall become effective as specified herein unless vetoed by the Mayor within ten days from the date it was passed and adopted• if the Mayor vetoes this Ordinance, it shall become effective immediately upon override of the veto by the City commission or upon the effective date stated herein, whichever is later. Page 4 of 5 o)3— 879 PASSED AND ADOPTED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING BY ,_.L - ONLY this 7th day of March , 2002. ATTEST: W R J. FOEMAN CI CLERK APPROVE 'AUTO FOfiM0%ND CORRECTNESS: OF ATTORNEY 91: YMT : smg Page 5 of 5 MANUEL A. DIAZ, t3R " City Clerk tkfi oj3— 879 E&ibit "1" (I Of 2) CHARLES V. CARR PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR AND RAPPER 9245 S.W. 44TH STREET TEL: 305-221-3416 MIAMI, FLORIDA 33165 FAX: 305-553-9903 SURVEY NUMBER:00-07-147 DATE OF FIELD SURVEY -.APRIL 13TH, 2001 RAP AND REPORT OF BOUNDARY SURVEY LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOTS 1 AND 4, BLocx 7, 'THIRD AMENDED PLAT OF MIRAMARO, ACC- ORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT SODIC 5 AT PAGE 4. OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA. ACCURACY: THE EXPECTED USE OF THE LAND, AS CLASSIFIED IN THE MINIMUM TECHNICAL STANDARDS (61617-6 FAC), is "MULTI—FAMILY RESIDENTIAL'. THE MINIMUM RELATIVE DISTANCE ACCURACY FOR THIS TYPE OF SURVEY IS I -FOOT IN 7500 FEET. THE ACCURACY OBTAINED BY MEASUREMENT WITH A SOKKIA TRANSIT AND A CHICAGO 200 FOOT STEEL TAPE AND CALCULATION OF A CLOSED GEOMETRIC FIGURE WAS -FOUND TO EXCEED THIS REQUIREMENT. DATA SOURCES: THIS IS A RECERTIFICATION OF A JULY 111TH, 2000 SURVEY. EASEMENTS: THREE RECORDED INSTRUMENTS WERE FURNISHED BY THE CLIENT AND ARE AS FOLLOWS: 1) DEED BOOK 162, PAGE 414, RECORDED ON MARCH 30, 1917 IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF MIAMI -MADE COUNTY. FLORIDA, DOES NOT AFFECT THIS PROPERTY. 2) OR 10704 P6 1842. RECORDED ON APRIL 1. 1980 IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF MI AMI—DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA, INDICATES A 10 FOOT EASEMENT GIVEN TO FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT FOR -THE CONSTRUCTION. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF ELECTRIC UTILITY FACILITIES THAT SERVICE THE PROPERTY. ATTEMPTS TO LOCATE SAID EASEMENT UPON THE SURVEY MAP WERE UNSUCCESSFUL DUE TO THE INELIGIBILITY OF FPBL'S DRAWING THAT WAS PART OF THE RECORDED INSTRUMENT. 3) OR 17982 PG 4280, RECORDED FEBRUARY 18, 1998 IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY. FLORIDA. INDICATES A LEASE FOR AN EASEMENT TO SPRINT SPECTRUM L.P.. A DELAWARE LIMITED PART— NERSHIP, FOR A PCS FACILITIES SITE. SAID EASEMENT IS LIMITED TO THE ROOF OF THE STRUCTURE LOCATED ON THIS PROPERTY ALONG WITH A NON—EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT FOR REASONABLE ACCESS THERETO AND TO THE APPROPRIATE SOURCE OF ELECTRIC AND TELEPHONE FAC- ILITIES. PREPARED FOR: AKERMAN. SENTERFITT S EIDSON, P.A., SUNTRUST INTERNATIONAL ALSDNTER, ONE SE THIRD AVE.. 28TH FLOOR, MIAMI. FL 33132-1714' RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH. SCHUSTER $ RUSSELL, P.A., 150 SECOND AVE. NORTH, 17TH FLOOR. ST. PETERSBURG, FLORIDA 33733. DROPFRTY ADDRESS: 121y� 4 a� City Clerk 03- M10 Exhibit "A" (2 of 2) LOT ACCORDING 70, THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 5 AT PAGE 4 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF MIAi+tt—bAUE COUNTY, FLORIDA. LATE OF n D SMVEY "Z2001 FLOOD 2ONE✓A COIN wmTY NQ.]a"ii63Z PmaL113 SXR& J DATE OF Fft_ 0L-tS-*3 BASE —FU -M-7 11.0 EXAMINATION OF THE ABSTRACT OF RU HAVE TO BE MADE TO DETEUK RECORD *MMMENTS. IF ANY AFF6CTMIC THE PROPERTY. LOCAIM AND OEHTIPICA11ON OF UIVIIES ON ANO/OR AOJACEMT TO THE PROPERTY NEIM NOT SECURED AS SUCH INFORMATION WAS NOT REQUESTED. OWNERSHIP IS SUBJECT TO OPINION OF TITLE. UNDERGROUND FOUNDATION AND UTILITIES NOT LOCATED. FOR ROLANDO DFI.QM ORDER No. a:VIPA JS DATE : as tag awl REV. . WAL �. GA. PROFESSIONAL SEMVLTOR AND VAPP» No.0108 STATE OF FLORIDA NOT TALC UMMS ZGRBD t EMBOMM SEAL, CARIBBEAN LAND SURVEYORS, INC. 3742 WEST 12th. AVE. MIAMI FL. 33012 TELEPHONE [3051 824-0040 FAX 624-0038 E-MAIL- CAtiMWANSURVEYOAOLCOM public a i` 9tl 1 A. � Y ny.r4 i 6,�3e�34.rk 1 City Clerk 1219'1 03- 879 J -01-x,025 2/19/016. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE MIAMI CITY COMMISSION AMENDIN3 ORDINANCE 10544, AS AMENDED, THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP OF THE COMPREHENSIVE HEIGHBO.MOOD PLAN BY CHANGING THE LAND USE DESIGNATION OF THE PROPERTIES LOCATED AT APPROX114ATELY 1852 AND 1900 NORTH BAYSHOR£ DRIVE, MIAMI, FLORIDA, FROM "HIGH DENSITY MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL" TO "RESTRICTED COMMERC:;AL"; MAKING FINDINGS; DIRECTING TRANSM'=TALS TO AFFECTED AGENCIES; CONTAIN --'NG A REPEALER PROVISION AND A SEVERABYLITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. The Future Land Use Map of Ordinance No. 10544, as amended, the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000, is hereby amended by changing the land use designation from "High Density Multifamily Residential" to "Restricted Commercial" for the properties located at approximately 1852 and 1900 North Bayshore, Miami, Florida, more particularly described as Lots 1, 4 and S. Block 7, of the THIRD AMENDED PLAT OF MIRAMAR according to the Plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 5 at Page 4 of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida. City Clerk 12i(i ,J3- 879 section 2. It is found that this Comprehensive Plan designation change: (a) is necessary due to changed or changing conditions; (b) involves a residential land use of to acres or less and a density of less than 10 units per acre or involves other land use categories, singularly or in combination with residential use, of to acres or less and does not, in combination with other changes duzing the last year, produce a cumulative effect of having changed more than 60 acres through the use of "Small scale development" procedures; (c) is one which involves property that has not been the specific: subject of a Comprehensive Plan change within the prior twelve months; (d) is one which does not involve the same owner's property within 200 feet of property that has been granted a Comprehensive Plan change within the prior twelve months; (e) the proposed amendment does not involve a text change to goals, policies, and objectives of the local government's comprehensive plan, but proposes a land use change to the future land use map for a site-spec:ific development; and pubfiC ti 5.x+.3 d• 4 y _.1^F�r i sson y Gaya Clerk Page 2 of 4 03- 879 (f) is one which is not located within an area of critical state concern. Section 3. The City Manager is directed to instruct the Director of the Planning and Zoning Department to immediately transmit a certified copy of this ordinance after its adoption on second reading to: the Secretary, Florida Department of Community Affairs; the Executive Director, South Florida Regional Planning Council, Hollywocd, Florida; the Executive Director, South Florida water Management District, West Palm Beach, Florida; the Secretary, Department of Transportation, Tallahassee, Florida; and the Executive Director, Department of Environmental Protection, Tallahassee, Florida. Section 4. All ordinances or parts of ordinances insofar as they are inconsistent or in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance are repealed. Section S. If any section, part of section, paragraph, clause, phrase, or word of this Ordinance is declared invalid, the remaining provisions of this Ordinance shall not be affected. Section 6. This Ordinance shall become effective thirty- one (31) days after second reading and adoption thereof pursuant and subject to § 163.3187(3) (c) , Fla. Stat. (2001) .i/ -'� -This Ordinance shsll become effective as specified herein unless vetoed by the Mayor wit!:.in ten days from the date it was passed and adopted. If the mayor vetoes this ordinance, it shall become effective immediately upon cverride of the veto by the City Commission or upon the effective date stated herein, whichever is later. Page 3 of 4 4 < <, Subrr ifie`c' !nf..o +h°, public itern PMSG. is A Ta iai, iipson City Clerk 03- 879 PASSED ON FIRST READING BY TITLE ONLY this 24'uh day of _January 2p01, PASSED AND ADOPTED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING BY TITLE ONLY this 7th day of March # 2002. MANUEL A. DIAZ, MA r ATTEST: t^t R J . FCEMAN0-p CI CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORP ECTNEgS AL'EJAMR I LARELLU ;'CITY ATTORNEY wiz71. :dd ,' l. Rh�a page 4 of 4 City Clerk 03- 879 I LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lot 1, Lot 4, and Ld 5 of '!Ai: amar, Addifiun to !Alla: ri; Plat Buck 5, FLOOR AREA RATIO :Pest Tower. Loft: Page 4 of the pubic records. Miall Dade County. FL. • PROPERTY AREA 116.164 square feet (gross) Total FA.R Area: 65,E95 s=uafe feet .'net) PROPERTY ZONING SDA "CentraCommeda Residential District ALLOWABLE RESIDENTIAL Floor area for all re3idem:al uses shall rot exceed FLOOR AREA RATIO 720 finles the gross IM area. . 7.20 x 116,184 x836,524.8 SF ACTUAL RESIDENTIAL East Tawer, Lofts: 523.9429 FLOOR AREA RATIO :Pest Tower. Loft: 309,517 W LobbvAreas: 2,765 S° Total FA.R Area: 836,524 SF Actual Residential F.AR.: 710 (4.16524.116im) ALLOWABLE Floor area for all non-residential uses shall not oxxed NON-RESIDENTIAL 12 tines the gross lot area. FLOOR AREA RATIO 17. x 116,184 = 139,42C SF ACTUAL Office 2,335 S= NON-RESIDENTIAL P.estaurant 3;835 S.- 'FLOOR FLOORAREA RATIO Retail 2.300 S . Total FAR. Area: 8,470 Ss . Actual Non4tesiderrial FAR.: 0.07 (R 470-1+6,1as) TOTAL 'The total floor area for all buildings on an iawidua: lot ALLOWABLE F.A.R. AND shall not extxled 8.4 fines the gross tot area.' ACTUAL F.A.R. Actual Residential FAIL: 720 PE.7n0USEMOp5t7YPEs Actuaf NonResiden-.ial F.A.R.: 0.07 : Total Actual FA.R 7.27 ALLOWABLE DENSITY 503 Units per Accra 1.5C6 Acres x 500 Units'Acre = 752 Urits AL•owed NUMBER OF UNITS 752 Total (448 Phase 1; 304 Phase 2) SETBACKS I Vat Bayshore Drive and Northeast 4th Avenue YARDS REQUIRED Vat interior abutting property firs SETBACKS[ 5' a'. Bayshore Drive YARDS PROVIDED 7' a' Northeast 41h 5' a: alley O at interior abutting line OPEN SPACE 1 'Ole square foul o: open spaca ur privAm racremon sparxe shall L•e pnrlirded RECREATION AREA for every 10 square feet of residential floor area' REQUIREMENTS i OPEN SPACE Required: 83.652 SF (E26524 SF Arvs • :01 4S7 ProvideA- 83,805 SF EAST TOWER UNITS TOVIER.Wore. TIMES 9,825 Exterior -Lewes 100,2^.0 . 4,230 Roof Top Garden- Level 4100 . 69,750 Recreational Spaces 8 Pool Paza- Lv 900.1000 PARKING PROVISIONS 'For dweling units there shay be a minimum of one parking space and a EAST TOWER PENTHOUSE PENIWAISEMMarrFEs maximum of Iwa spaces.' PE.7n0USEMOp5t7YPEs 'For restaurants, bars, one per 100 SF net patron Des' 3,835 -100 = 39 spaces PINTHOUSE LEVE:S 380:nW IOOD 'For Retail and Senice uses, a minks rn of one per 1.000 SF of press floor area and a maximum olone per 300 SF.t :.::. �.:::::. ..:.:�:::.�:•:::::::::::::::::::::::::.::.::: :•.:::::.. p ) 5F= 1.353 1374 M4 1,7!1 1.809 2,300 -1000 = 3 spaces i ..................................... ..............0.........11..1................. ST. T.. 4 ..... 'For business and professional office use, a lnlnimum of one pa.kmg space per ; 1377+ 800 SF.' j 2.335 - 800 = 3 spaces Parking Provisions: Mrs SPACES (OW ws�A PP W110 East Loft 54 54 East Colts :179 379 East Toweri PH 15 15 West Logs 30 30 West Tower 262 '2162 Wes: Toyer I PH 12 12 Total Residential Spaces: 762 752 r Retail aqd Service Spaces: 3 1 Cf:ioe: 3 Restaurant Spaces: 39 Guest Spaces. 48 Total Avallable Parking (All Levels) 845 Total Required Parking (AI Lents) 797 SpFCES REQUIRED ACCESSIBLE Required Aczes3ible Paring Spaces 2% of Total PARKING SPACES 2% of 845 = .7 Required A.^.essble Vat. Parking Spaces = ' in every 8 17*8= 2 PROVIDED ACCESSIBLE Provided Accessible Parking Spares IT PARKING SPACES Provided Accessible Van Parking Spaces 3 rr•A382p011L4I 906 1111 ........ :1111.. ............ 16 jft* SF- 1.218 1. ESTTOWERUNITS :aMAi 6xx.CLem6 LEVELS MO TRU 2304 ........ 1111 1111.:. in 10.6s) SF- 930 lino 699 SOS 451 729 502 60 NO the m TYFICN. LEVELS Tie: 4-0-• ::::�:<>::: ':.;y`; :i'::a�:^:>' '::::'Fri`i 6�:`:i'.;<.:ii:%:i':l�;t::f4::.>:.:;.:;;;::;:::2:::::;:: 5!290 a . ....:::::0 EH ::::::.:::::. :. �.. �.. �. LcIELS 34A 1NW 2:W 11 ::>a•:i;>::;.:i::;::;; ::<:::::;:::;:F:>:::: 11....:::4::.::5.:: •::::::::::::: :.;:::dl .....: �f:.:.:.:..::.:.:........... :::.:......•..:............................ rl knelt) SF- 1.35. — 509 773 836 1.176 766 CA SSS `.219 1361 14let•!1sl Sf• IS47 IA10 599 >M4 4S7 729 532 — 1,679 EAST TOWER UNITS TOVIER.Wore. TIMES . . TYPICAL LEVELS 449x1 Tia: 450:, <:ilii till EY: ;f};i[3i 0;:i ii;N'<':........................................T'^<>:: .<:...1111 ..._...a ..ills ea...e .1111 (2Yvdg SF- 1,316 .-1111. _ - EAST TOWER PENTHOUSE PENIWAISEMMarrFEs WESTTOMIREMOUSE PE.7n0USEMOp5t7YPEs PENTHOUSE LEVELS 1Q101Hn6 RBOC :Ixtt::';:;:: Pg2C::i:i;;:PIU>:i'i;:>::PI1l':::::::>::Pkb:>:i%;:`::::<i::>:>::::`:> :: •::::.. PINTHOUSE LEVE:S 380:nW IOOD :API:.:.:.:.:E412':::•.PMI::::Y,IIY:::.::.:::>::.::.:;•'•::.::.::.::.:>":'.::.::.::...: .......: �:....:.......::........J�.i!... :.::. �.:::::. ..:.:�:::.�:•:::::::::::::::::::::::::.::.::: :•.:::::.. p ) 5F= 1.353 1374 M4 1,7!1 1.809 p k ea) ..................................... ..............0.........11..1................. ST. T.. 4 ..... 1314 1377+ c. iter, a d City Clerk ,j3- 879 Ty s Instrument Prepared by and Rei urn to Carlos M. Rodriguez, Esq. Greenberg Traurig, P.A. 1221 Brickell Avenue — 24t' Floor Miami, FL 33131 Parcel Nos.: 01-3231-003-0510 01-3231-003-0530 y..,..;r�.. 2102OPG0754 City Clark 4. .i{ ..} . X fi.%_�, ;'r•:ri�}E7 ;i';Ci�e_{ �'tt.:'v'.R14*j: t:�_i•`iri i:r:tl{:. L\{{t•i{��i �'�. Space above this line for recorder's use only Tax ID No.: ;3 L - qgI � 7 qS I SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED THIS INDENTURE made as of this l0 k day of February, 2003, by and between PARKSHORE ON THE BAY, L.L.C., a Florida limited liability company ("Grantor"), for and in consideration of Ten Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration in hand paid, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, hereby grants, bargains, sells, aliens, remises, releases and conveys unto TERRA -ADI INTERNATIONAL BAYSHORE, LLC, a Florida limited liability company ("Grantee") having an address of /a oo B RlLKeL4_ Rvr-, s ui rF 080 , m�A.,,,, r 3�3! the following described real property in the County of Miami -Dade, State of Florida, to -wit: SEE EXHIBIT A ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF. SUBJECT TO REAL ESTATE TAXES FOR THE YEAR 2003 AND SUBSEQUENT YEARS. SUBJECT TO THOSE CERTAIN PERMITTED TITLE EXCEPTIONS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT B ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF. TOGETHER with all the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances, with every privilege, right, title, interest and estate, reversion, remainder and easement thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same in fee simple forever. And the Grantor does hereby covenant that Grantor does fully warrant the title to the above- described real estate so hereby conveyed and will defend the same against the lawful claims, arising out of events occurring prior to the recording of this Deed, all of persons claiming by, through or under the Grantor, but against none other. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor aforesaid has set its hand and seal as of the 6 tA day of February, 2003. WITNESSES: li lZe �4c Print me: 61 f fol tl wei k v L. C Print Name: PARKSH )�HE BAY, L.L.C. By: lit�i �tlt Alan Freeman, Manager 93- 879 l n� D " F. GSC S. K. 2 102- 0 PG 0 15 5 Space above this line for recorder's.use only STATE OF ILLINOIS COUNTY OF C 0 0 K The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this lei', day of February, 2003, by ALAN FREEMAN, as Manager of PARKSHORE ON THE BAY, L.L.C., a Florida limited liability company. 8451872.DOC Notary Public My Commission Expires: "OFFICIAL "OFFICIAL SEAL" MICHAEL A. CRAMAROSSO NOTARY PUBLIC, STATE OF ILLINOIS MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 5/11/2006 a the pub116 F. n CRY Clerk 2 03- 879 2 1 020PU`0756 Space above this line for recorder's use only EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lots 1, 4 and 5, Block 7, of MIRAMAR THIRD AMENDED SUBDIVISION, according to the plat thereof, recorded in Plat Book 5, Page 4, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida. Parcel Numbers: 01-3231-003-0510 01-3231-003-0530 Address: 1852 and 1900 North Bayshore Drive Miami, Florida 1',�,e, public s::1,16 0;11 City Clerk A-] a"F. RE. E 21020PGO757 Space above this line for recorder's use only EXHIBITB 1,,¢�s the public PERMITTED EXCEPTIONS l�� .� Z l '? � a3_ 1. Riparian or littoral rights. Uitya Clerk 2. Easements or claims of easements not shown by the Public Records, boundary line disputes, overlaps, encroachments, and any matters not of record which would be disclosed by an accurate survey and inspection of the premises. 3. Any claim to any portion of the land below the ordinary high water line of Biscayne Bay and other adjacent waters, if any. 4. Rights of the State of Florida based on the doctrine of the state's sovereign ownership of lands lying below the mean high water line of any navigable or tidally influenced waters. 5. Any land which is artificially filled land in what was formerly navigable waters, is subject to the rights of the United States government, arising by said government's control over navigable waters involving navigation and commerce. 6. Matters contained in the 3`d Amended Plat of Miramar, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 5, Page 4, all of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida. 7. Restrictions, dedications and easements as shown on the Plat of 3`d Amended Plat of Miramar recorded in Plat Book 5, Page 4. NOTE: This exception omits any restriction, covenant, or condition based on race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status or national origin, if any, unless and only to the extent that the restriction is not in violation of state or federal law, or relates to a handicap, but does not discriminate against handicapped people. 8. Easement(s) granted to Florida Power and Light Company, recorded April 1, 1980 in Official Records Book 10704, Page 1842 (as to Lots 1 and 4), of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida. 9. Terms, covenants, conditions and other matters contained in the Memorandum of PCS Site Agreement, recorded February 18, 1998, in Official Records Book 17982, Page 4280, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida. 10. Liens for any unpaid special assessments for the year 2003 and subsequent years arising by virtue of the ordinances and resolutions creating these districts and more specifically set forth as follows: Ordinances and Resolutions recorded in Official Records Book 11114, Page 822, Official Records Book 12923, Page 2618, Official Records Book 12923, Page 2622, B-1 03- 879 t f. iiia. E; . 21020PGO758 Space above this line for recorder's use only Official Records Book 14258, Page 2399, Official Records Book 14646, Page 2513, Official Records Book 15168, Page 2413, Official Records Book 15615, Page 1652, Official Records Book 16035, Page 3996, Official Records Book 16478, Page 1048, Official Records Book 16872, Page 1634 and Official Records Book 17326, Page 2605, all of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida. Su'b ±f,,d lntr, to public A B-2 03- 879 Miami -Dade My Home My Home miami ade Show Me: Property information it Search By: Select Iters Cnmmary nratailse Folio No.: 1.-3231_003-0530 Property: 1852 N BAYSHORE DR Mailing TERRA ADI INATL Address: BAYSHORE LLC $0 1200 BRICKELL AVE STE $1,126,500 80 MIAMI FL ssessed Vaiue: $1,126,500 3131- Property Information: $0 Primary 6402 MIX USE -BORDERS Zone: 12BD LUCje: 081 VACANT LAND Beds//0 Floors: Living 22,530 SQ FT oize: Year Built: 3153 42 MIRAMAR PB 5-4 OT 5 BLK 7 AND PROP INT IN & TO COMMON Legal ELEMENTS NOT Description: DEDICATED TO PUBLIC OT SIZE 22530 SQUARE FEET Page 1 of 2 MIAMI -DARE A A n GORE =' Sale Information: Digital Orthophotography - March 2001 0 . 120 It Sate 1020-0754 Dat1 Sale Date: ILJ2003 Sale Amount: 9,950,000 My Home I Propedy Information I Proper axes I My Neighborhood I Property Appraiser Assessment Information: Home ( Using Our Site I About I Phone Directory I Privacy I Disclaimer Year: 2002 2001 Land Value: $1,126,500 $675,900 Build Value: $0 $0 Market Value: $1,126,500 $675,900 ssessed Vaiue: $1,126,500 $675,900 otal Exemptions. $0 $0 axable Value: 1$1,126,500 $675,900 f you experience technical difficulties with the Property Information application, please click here to let us know. E-mail your comments, questions and suggestions to Webmaster Legend Property Boundary Selected ow Property r/V Street *4/ Highway Miami -Dad County ■ Water N W E S Web Site 0 2002 Miami -Dade County. All rights reserved. I F 'P'r, ° -' !" �"� to public re, iii P2 �3 1 r3��_:c4c;P. E"'�5 9 iJit"e„'�Oi1 City Clerk 03- 879 http://gisims2.co.miami-dade.fl.uslmyhomelpropmap.asp?app=propmap&bytool=FOLIO&cmd=FINDFOL... 4/1/2003 Miami -Dade My Home My Home r lamr a e.gr�v Show Me: Property Information !F; Search By: Select Item _Qnmmaru theaism' Folio No.: 1.-3231-003 051,0 Property: 1900 BAYSHORE DR 119-1 Mailing TERRA ADI INATL Address: BAYSHORE LLC $2,066,096 1200 BRICKELL AVE STE $4,312,488 MIAMI FL F31 d Value: $4,312,488 - Property Information: $0 Primary 6402 MIX USE -BORDERS Zone: CBD CLUC: 043 HEALTH CARE Beds/Baths: 110/110 Floors: 10 Living Units: 110 e: 93,003 44.068 SQ FT dize: Year Built: 1980 MIRAMAR PB 5-4 LOTS 1 & BLK 7 & PROP INT IN & Legal O COMMON ELEMENTS Description: OT DEDICATED TO PUBLIC OR 21020-0754 t203 2 2 ACTIVE TOOL: SELECT Page 1 of 2 MIAMI-DADE Aqa�nfiklsm=. Sale Information: Sale O/R: 21020-0754 Digital Orthophotography -March 2001 0 120 ft Sale Date: /2003 Sale Amount: t$9,950,000 My Home I Property Information I Properly Taxes I My Neighborhood I Propeft Appraiser Assessment Information: Home I Using Our_Site I AboutI Phone Directory I PrivacyI Disclaimer f you experience technical difficulties with the Property Information application, please click here to let us know. E-mail your comments, questions and suggestions to Webmaster Legend Property Boundary Selected Jov Property '/✓ Street gyp/ Highway Miami -Dad County ■ Water N W E S Web Site Subfftt^#! gild the public - 2002 Miami -Dade County. All rights reserved. I .b 03- 879 http://gisims2.co.miami-dade. fl.us/myhome/propmap.asp?app=propmap&bytool=none&cmd=SELECT&to... 4/1/2003 2002 2001 lue: $2,203,400 $1,233,904 BuilValue: $2,109,088 $2,066,096 alue: PExemptions: $4,312,488 $3,300,000 d Value: $4,312,488 $3,300,000 $0 $0 axable Value: 1 $4,312,488 $3,300,000 f you experience technical difficulties with the Property Information application, please click here to let us know. E-mail your comments, questions and suggestions to Webmaster Legend Property Boundary Selected Jov Property '/✓ Street gyp/ Highway Miami -Dad County ■ Water N W E S Web Site Subfftt^#! gild the public - 2002 Miami -Dade County. All rights reserved. I .b 03- 879 http://gisims2.co.miami-dade. fl.us/myhome/propmap.asp?app=propmap&bytool=none&cmd=SELECT&to... 4/1/2003 VONSUELO M. QUINTANA REAL ESTATE DATA RESEARCHER 1111 SW 11th Avenue, Miami, FL 33129-1820 OFC # 305-858-2287 FAX # 305-859-2439 MARCH 27, 2003 CITY OF MIAMI PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENTS HEARING BOARDS DIVISION P.O. BOX 330708 MIAMI, FL 33233-0708 RE: PROPERTY OWNERSHIP LIST 500' FEET OF: 1852 N BAYSHORE DR & 1900 BAYSHORE DR 119-1 MIAMI, FL 33132 F#01-3231-003-0510/0530 (STREET ADDRESS) LOTS 1-4-5 & PROP INT IN & TO COMMON ELEMENTS NOT DEDICATED TO PUBLIC BLOCK 7 MIRAMAR SUBDIVISION PLAT BOOK 5-4 (SEE MAP ATTACHED) DADE COUNTY FLORIDA. THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE ATTACHED OWNERSHIP LIST, MAP AND MAILING MATRIX IS A COMPLETE AND ACCURATE REPRESENTATION OF THE REAL ESTATE PROPERTY AND PROPERTY OWNERS 500' FEET FROM THE SUBJECT PROPERTY LISTED ABOVE. THIS REFLECTS THE MOST CURRENT RECORDS ON FILE IN THE DADE COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S OFFICE. SINCERELY, % ,�.i ��t!A • • • ( 69 LABELS WITHOUT REPETITION ) ( 97 NAMES ORIGINALLY ) i .nom City G1erk (MIA -2444) (L-1111) (C-87/88/89) (INV -2883) (TX -03/27/03) (D-3/03) 03- 879 '• 3 J 2 1 p f a L r G D Y N c 5 No SJ N p 7• 3♦ ! � K I_ _ F S 9- 3 e0 �Fafi'V N.E. 7 7 5 3 ♦ IJ 12 11 f 8 1 L 3 ♦ a 2. c1 } i. r rd6r i S 2 4 3� I ;rI ? It W lQ i r1-10 e 7 2 5 6 5 2 •' 2.,4 I` Tq R IL s z I•L� 3♦ J s LL - ' ss Los I:a I ec (109-24) _ v° i. N.E. $ s 24X119-5)* AGHER VI GE S1.. �( r W , U E L R 2 6 .o. ; R r A i '. 5 12 �I ^� 9 I3 ♦ I I a G 3 3] J .. F II Lf 1 1 ► ♦ 9 ♦ K }y 1 I I i r •t O•r: uc J EEO 3 Q % 1t i1 5 2 > 10 W r5 r ^ lo.. „ Re _. s.3. Z ,., Is:3 7 ,r i 3 c31 ry •r*,r-�T4 . 1�2I " z 1'_ le II z a u z e w '� � �, _ . (s. f i N.E- I 13 -23 ST. I� � ,• v f 1.151, 3 SS �, 19-* f w TERRANGVA I • r e - 91SCAYNE 2 S Sl,o rrN A N CY z ESR N♦AC ::_ • I_ ? •.•-.. I A 9 45 : -4 °. n° I L rl" b c J •, ,d � r s •' kT •a t� (750-14i w . ILC Ip2 i Z I 'go 7u tV..--._ "� .••5 _ 22 DC7 YJO /rs MILLSKORE ST. . �a° i IIIIo 9 e )O 3 ♦ I3 2 0 8 e e :• / 1 > r EGSTWdd�.G S. MAP ai cS a• Is Iz n to f le s ,♦ I 1 S � 0 Ir - uJ i4. r= I 1 N.L. I�° 21 y ] •I 1 I e O / ,1�irLss� j 2 i 2 V - 3 1 = /j(jr^'•� IJ. S. Map9ca Lill E y S a ' x N ,ERR. Ert R _,. ^� S:V • I o I I, % P ° o l7 I s n •' l I I T IT— L I. x ea SC 9 S a 3 Z 11 n E. si. •--2I nn ar. :r. rf o a SIJ" llJ ! 2 • 2 i • s I ♦a ' 1 ePy '! L :.�.H.E. i9 SI 41_ w3 EMPLE L o > 1 v w N" SRAEL tt SUB. = 1 ZR ■" U. to Lw� 3 7 a3 Z LL ? 1i 1_'i la 12 R+� -w�1 � _N �' Iz Ila 6 'lo ^•S ssl o p ° "�"'` .. {..>°� ,;-�� m .5 $S s N.E 18 ST < . ._ e� p BISCAYNE Ls x 1 � 2r. �,. ■ f _ - ��Q.`?- FEDERAL 6 r u a-)' •°i PLAZA Q °s a'' w �• c ¢ c .:._ y L II (M09 771 w c4 9 x Clerk SE4��� r- I u Jr 9'79) GX ;'.j z ; °1 TRACT'W' = Ae1AEN "' • � a ff Z v CD "!;"•R. E 17 E R R. a �o a Q tJ11RAM 1 -I , I s I L s 1 3; 13 x +e " :•r. PLAZA - iiT 1c .° U �_ + N.E. — CBD (10' j !S�<:� iI I •f rx rJ 1 IS 1'3 1 1 NTERN Tk—T tot -3 WD IONAL 3 IN O ;1 rL IS 1 IS • 11 10 Y� � ^ , PLAZA ��I1 03- 879 1 (L-1111 L) (20 LABELS WITHOUT REPET"ION) (ORIGINALLY 32 NAMES) T RACE CONTRINO CMS GRP INC % GRACE SMITH At -..,,,MS PEACH EDUC FND INC 3806 BAILEY AVE #E2 1900 BISC BLVD BRONX NY 10463 MIA FL 33132 FIRST CHURCH OF CHRIST ABRAHAM & E KLEPACH SCIENTIST 1785 BAY DR 1836 BISC BLVD MIA BCH FL 33141 MIA FL 33132 E HENRY VALENTINE JR V DOWNTOWN INC _. 1848 NE 4TH AVE 2801 NE 208TH TER #102 MIA FL 33132 AVENTURA FL 33180 MIA CHINESE COMM CITY OF MIA DEPT OF CENTER LTD % SHIH P & D ASSET MGT DIV 3804 BAILEY AVE #E1 444 SW 2ND AVE #325 BRONX NY 10463 MIA FL 33130 ADER PROPERTIES IVORY ARC INC 18'' ' BAYSHORE DR 11767 RIVERVIEW DR M -33132 HOUSTON TX 77077 ADER PROPERTIES MIA CHINESE COMM CTR LTD 1825 NE 4TH AVE #1 % D T AZRIN ESQ MIA FL 33132 3804 BAILEY AVE #E1 BRONX NY 10463 1800 CLUB LTD BISC & 18 PLAZA CORP % BCOM INC 150 SE 2ND AVE 1201 BRICKELL AVE #650 AMERICAS CTR #1200 MIA FL 33131 MIA FL 33131 JOSE M CALDERON FLEX ENT INC', 7930 NW 167TH TER PO BOX 4339 HIA FL 33016 TEQUESTA FL 33469 \ L;i BAYWATCH APTS INC GHISLAINE SCHUNICHT 12763 SW 280TH ST 348 NE 20TH TER HOMESTEAD FL 33032 MIA FL 33137 TIBOR HOLLO MIRAMAR APTS LTD 100 S BISC BLVD #1100 100 S BISC BLVD'#1100 MIA FL 33131 MIA FL 33131 03- 8 `ry 9 BELMAR CONDO. 419 NE 19 ST, MIAP 7L 33132 (C -87L) (13 UNITS) \ dT K RUBEO ROBERT GILLEY & 41w NE 19 ST #101 GORDON WILSON MIA FL 33132 8488 NW 196TH TER HIA FL 33015 GRACIELA RIVADENEIRA THOMAS WAGNER & M C MANTILLA MANDELL MARY BEHR 1741 COLLINS AVE 419 NE 19 ST #502 MIA BCH FL 33139 MIA FL 33132 DAVID V & M A & BRIAN J MICELI F V VILA 419 NE 19 ST #503 1375 MARSEILLE DR MIA FL 33132 MIA BCH FL 33141 W & C ZARRABEITIA 419 NE 19 ST#203 MIA FL 33132 LAURA VARAS C N #549 BOYACA F ,OX 9936 GUAYAQUIL ECUADOR KENNETH E MERKER 4424 NE 1ST AVE MIA FL 33137 CHRISTIAN HELMSTETTER 2110 NE 197TH TER MIA FL 33179 STEVEN COHEN & BRUCE WITHEY 1200 WASHINGTON ST #512 BOSTON MA 02118 DIANA S GLACCUM 419 NE 19TH ST #402 Mir Wil- 33132 LOURDES HERRERO 419 NE 19 ST #403 MIA FL 33132 public Gil Y i e r k 03- 8"79 1 YVETTE TERRACE CONDO. 1801 NE 4-- AVE. MIAMI, FL 33132 ;C -88L) 18 UNITS C RESTREPO PIEDAD HERNANDEZ 1b_. NE4AVE #101 1801 NE4AVE #401 MIAMI FL 33132 MIAMI FL 33132 4 & G PALACIOS ROBERTO HERNANDEZ 1801 NE 4 AVE # 102 1801 NE 4 AVE #402 \IIA FL 33132 MIAMI FL 33132 SSAC & JOAN SHIH CARLOS L PACANINS 1801 NE 4 AVE # 201 1801 NE 4 AVE #403 AIA FL 33132 MIAMI FL 33132 -ARMEN C MANGUANAGUA GUY J DEMASCOLO JR 1801 NE 4 AVE #202 1801 NE 4 AVE #404 \IIA FL 33145 MIAMI FL 33132 RAY D CARPENTER FRANCK C MAGLOIRE JR 18r 'E 4 AVE # 203 % LYNX AIR JI =L 33132 PO BOX 407139 FT LAUD FL 33340 'ARLOS LUIS PACANINS A J &A C ROJAS 1801 NE 4 AVE #204 1801 NE 4 AVE #502 JIIAMI FL 33132 MIAMI FL 33132 _UIS R & MARIA NALVARTE CARLOS SANDOVAL 1801 NE 4 AVE #301 10990 SW 34TH ST JIIAMI FL 33132 MIAMI FL 33165 IOSEPH L MTZ-AGULLO A J& A C ROJAS 3260 SW 28TH ST 1801 NE 4 AVE #504 JIIAMI FL 33155 MIAMI FL 33132 STEVEN SANTIAGO 1801 NE 4TH AVE #303 AIA R. 33132 \LBERT W & S M DILTHEY 124 SARAH COVE RD )TTO NC 28763 03 8'79 BAYSHORE TOWERS OF MIAMI CONC 1778 N BAYSHORE DRIVE, MIAMI, FL 3 2 (C -89L) (18 LABELS WITHOUT REPETI � .JN) (ORIGINALLY 34 NAMES) I S MAZO % omARRERO ETALS 2903 SALZEDO ST C GABLES FL 33134 MARIA ARIAS 2903 SALZEDO ST C GABLES FL 33134 ROSA MARRERO 2903 SALZEDO ST C GABLES FL 33134 NIEVES MAZO 1778 N BAYSHORE DR #102 MIA FL 33132 MARIA ARIAS °/ 'O MARRERO 2 ,ALZEDO ST C GABLES FL 33134 NIEVES MAZO 1778 N BAYSHORE DR #103 MIA FL 33132 NIEVES MAZO 1535 TREVINO AVE C GABLES FL 33134 NIEVES MAZO 1778 N BAYSHORE DR #104 MIA FL 33132 MARIA ARIAS % JULIO MARRERO 29n' SALZEDO ST C ES FL 33134 MARIA ARIAS 2901 SALZEDO ST C GABLES FL 33134 NIEVES MAZO 1778 N BAYSHORE DR #404 MIA FL 33132 SHELDON SELTZER 1778 N BAYSHORE DR # 504 MIAMI FL 33132 NIEVES MAZO 1778 N BAYSHORE DR #604 MIA FL 33132 NIEVES MAZO 1778 N BAYSHORE DR #105 MIA FL 33132 NIEVES MAZO 1778 N BAYSHORE DR #205 MIA FL 33132 K & K & P & N CHATANI 1401 BAY RD #507 MIA BCH FL 33139 NIEVES MAZO 1778 N BAYSHORE DR #206 MIA FL 33132 NIEVES MAZO 1778 N BAYSHORE DR #606 MIA FL 33132 03- 879 2-1 03- 879 a F 03 MIRAMAR PB 5-4 BLOCK 2 ' °� Clerk (L-1111) (32 LABELS) (TX -03/26-27/03) 50OFT LOT 1 & PROP INT IN & TO COMMON ELEMENTS THE GRACE CONTRINO NOT DEDICATED TO PUBLIC ABRAMS PEACH EDUC FND INC 1900 RISC BLVD 1900 BISC BLVD 01-3231-003-0080 MIA FL 33132 BLOCK 5 LOTS 1 TO 4 INC & PARCEL 6A AS PER PB FIRST CHURCH OF CHRIST 51-98 SCIENTIST 256 NE 19TH ST 1836 BISC BLVD 01-3231-003-0270 MIA FL 33132 BLOCK 6 LOT 1 & PROP INT IN & TO COMMON ELEMENTS E HENRY VALENTINE JR NOT DEDICATED TO PUBLIC 1848 NE 4TH AVE 1848 NE 4TH AVE MIA FL 33132 01-3231-003-0360 LOT 2 & PROP INT IN & TO COMMON ELEMENTS MIA CHINESE COMM NOT DEDICATED TO PUBLIC CENTER LTD % SHIH 1844 NE 4TH AVE 3804 BAILEY AVE #E1 11-3231-003-0370 BRONX NY 10463 LOT 6 & PROP INT IN & TO COMMON ELEMENTS MIA CHINESE COMM NOT DEDICATED TO PUBLIC CENTER LTD % SHIH 1840 NE 4TH AVE 3804 BAILEY AVE #E1 01-3231-003-0390 BRONX NY 10463 LOT 7 & N8FT OF LOT 10 PROP INT IN & TO MIA CHINESE COMM COMMON ELEMENTS NOT DEDICATED TO PUBLIC CENTER LTD % SHIH 1824 NE 4TH AVE 3804 BAILEY AVE #E1 01-3231-003-0400 BRONX NY 10463 S45FT OF LOT 10 & PROP INT IN & TO COMMON MIA CHINESE COMM ELEMENTS NOT DEDICATED TO PUBLIC CENTER LTD % SHIH 1820 NE 4TH AVE 3804 BAILEY AVE #E1 01-3231-003-0440 BRONX NY 10463 LOT 11 & PROP INT IN & TO COMMON MIA CHINESE COMM ELEMENTS NOT DEDICATED TO PUBLIC CENTER LTD % SHIH 331 NE 18TH ST 3804 BAILEY AVE #E1 01-3231-003-0450 BRONX NY 10463 LOT 12 & PROP INT IN & TO COMMON MIA CHINESE COMM 'LEMENTS NOT DEDICATED TO PUBLIC CENTER LTD % SHIH ,27 NE 18TH ST 3804 BAILEY AVE #E1 01-3231-003-0460 BRONX NY 10463 BLOCK 7 LOT 2 & LOT 3 & PROP INT IN & TO COMMON ELEMENTS ADER PROPERTIES NOT DEDICATED TO PUBLIC 1800 N BAYSHORE DR 03- 8'7 9 1837 NE 4TH AVE MIA FL 33132 ni-,mi-nm-nrinn a,hrr's¢b it e public MIRAMAR PB 5-4SA- BLOCK 7 l"is y r Vcity Cierk LOT 6 & LOT 7 & PROP INT IN & TO COMMON ELEMENTS ADER PROPERTIES NOT DEDICATED TO PUBLIC 1825 NE 4TH AVE #1 1825 NE 4TH AVE MIA FL 33132 01-3231-003-0540 01-3231-003-0550 LOTS 8 & 9 & 12 PER UNITY OF TITLE OR 20546-2688 1800 CLUB LTD & PROP INT IN & TO COMMON ELEMENTS NOT DEDICATED % BCOM INC TO PUBLIC 1201 BRICKELL AVE #650 1830 N BAYSHORE DR MIA FL 33131 BLOCK 8 LOT 2 & PROP INT IN & TO COMMON ELEMENTS JOSE M CALDERON NOT DEDICATED TO PUBLIC 7930 NW 167TH TER 430 NE 18TH ST HIA FL 33016 01-3231-003-0620 LOT 3 & PROP INT IN & TO COMMON ELEMENTS JOSE M CALDERON NOT DEDICATED TO PUBLIC 7930 NW 167TH TER 1799 NE 4TH AVE HIA FL 33016 11-3231-003-0630 LOT 4 & PROP INT IN & TO COMMON ELEMENTS BAYWATCH APTS INC NOT DEDICATED TO PUBLIC 12763 SW 280TH ST 1770 N BAYSHORE DR HOMESTEAD FL 33032 01-3231-003-0640 LOT 6 & PROP INT IN & TO COMMON ELEMENTS TIBOR HOLLO NOT DEDICATED TO PUBLIC 100 S BISC BLVD #1100 1795 NE 4TH AVE MIA FL 33131 01-3231-003-0660 LOT 7 & N1/2 OF LOT 10 & PROP INT IN & TO TIBOR HOLLO COMMON ELEMENTS NOT DEDICATED TO PUBLIC 100 S BISC BLVD #1100 1783 NE 4TH AVE MIA FL 33131 01-3231-003-0670 S112 OF LOT 10 & LOT 11 & PROP INT IN & TO TIBOR HOLLO COMMON ELEMENTS NOT DEDICATED TO PUBLIC 100 S BISC BLVD #1100 407 NE 17TH TER MIA FL 33131 01-3231-003-0690 BLOCK 9 LOT 1 & PROP INT IN & TO COMMON ELEMENTS CMS GRP INC % GRACE SMITH NOT DEDICATED TO PUBLIC 3806 BAILEY AVE #E2 794 NE 4TH AVE BRONX NY 10463 01-3231-003-0700 LOT 2 & PROP INT IN & TO COMMON ELEMENTS ABRAHAM & E KLEPACH J _ Q 8 9 NOT DEDICATED TO PUBLIC 1785 BAY DR 320 NE 18TH ST MIA BCH FL 33141 01-3231-003-0710 17 03 MIRAMAR PB 5-4 t BLOCK 9 I �1"y Clerk LOT 3 & PROP INT IN & TO COMMON ELEMENTS NOT ABRAHAM & E KLEPACH DEDICATED TO PUBLIC 1785 BAY DR 312 NE 18TH ST MIA BCH FL 33141 01-3231-003-0720 LOT 6 & PROP INT IN & TO COMMON ELEMENTS V DOWNTOWN INC NOT DEDICATED TO PUBLIC 2801 NE 208TH TER #10Z 1770 NE 4TH AVE AVENTURA FL 33180 01-3231-003-0750 CORAL PARK PB 2-66 LANDS LYG ELY & ADJ TO LOTS 1 & 2 EXTDG TO CITY OF MIA DEPT OF BLKHD/L & SUBMERGED LANDS P & D ASSET MGT DIV 498 NE 20TH ST 444 SW 2ND AVE #325 01-3231-001-0021 MIA FL 33130 CHINATOWN PB 140-48 TRACT A IVORY ARC INC S105FT OF TR A 11767 RIVERVIEW DR VACANT HOUSTON TX 77077 31-3231-051-0011 TR A LESS S105FT MIA CHINESE COMM CTR LTD 1825 BISC BLVD % D T AZRIN ESQ 01-3231-051-0010 3804 BAILEY AVE #E1 BRONX NY 10463 BISC FEDL PLAZA 1 ST ADDN PB 116-7 TRACT B BISC & 18 PLAZA CORP TR B 150 SE 2ND AVE 1801 NE 2ND CT AMERICAS CTR #1200 01-3231-042-0010 MIA FL 33131 TRACT C 1ST CHURCH OF CHRIST TR C SCIENTIST 1836 BISC BLVD 1836 BISC BLVD 01-3231-042-0020 MIA FL 33132 BAYSIDE PARK PB 2-40 BLOCK 1 FLEX ENT INC E107.5FT OF LOTS 1 & 2 PO BOX 4339 2040 N BAYSHORE DR TEQUESTA FL 33469 01-3230-032-0010 W44FT OF LOTS 1 & 2 & LOT 3 FLEX ENT INC 363 NE 20TH TER PO BOX 4339 01-3230-032-0020 TEQUESTA FL 33469 LOT 4 & E1/2 LOT 5 FLEX ENT INC 033— 879 345 NE 20TH TER PO BOX 4339 01-3230-032-0030 TEQUESTA FL 33469 BAYSIDE PARK PB 2-40 BLOCK 4 LOT 4 & E112 LOT 5 348 NE 20TH TER 01-3230-032-0220 SEAPORT PB 149-79 BLOCK 1 LOT 1 1756 N BAYSHORE DR 01-3231-053-0010 GHISLAINE SCHUNICHT 348 NE 20TH TER MIA FL 33137 MIRAMAR APTS LTD 100 S BISC BLVD #1100 MIA FL 33131 03- 879 2 -- City Clerk 03- 879 BELMAR CONDO. 419 NE 19TH ST. MIAMI FL 33132 LOT 1 LESS W15FT, BLOCK 1, MIRAMAR SUB. PB 5-4 (C-87) (13 UNITS) F01-3231-034 D-3/03 101 201 202 203 301 302 303 401 402 S�11�-,. ;d Into the public P2 _ 1 VICENT K RUBEO 419 NE 19 ST#101 MIA FL 33132 GRACIELA RIVADENEIRA M C MANTILLA MANDELL 1741 COLLINS AVE MIA BCH FL 33139 DAVID V&MA& F V VILA 1375 MARSEILLE DR MIA BCH FL 33141 W & C ZARRABEITIA 419 NE 19 ST # 203 MIA FL 33132 LAURA VARAS COLON #549 BOYACA P O BOX 9936 GUAYAQUIL ECUADOR KENNETH E MERKER 4424 NE 1ST AVE MIA FL 33137 CHRISTIAN HELMSTETTER 2110 NE 197TH TER MIA FL 33179 STEVEN COHEN & BRUCE WITHEY 1200 WASHINGTON ST #512 BOSTON MA 02118 DIANA S GLACCUM 419 NE 19TH ST #402 MIA FL 33132 403 LOURDES HERRERO 419 NE 19ST#403 03-, 879 MIA FL 33132 BELMAR CONDO. 419 NE 19 ST. MIAMI FL 33132 C-87 501 502 503 ROBERT GILLEY & GORDON WILSON 8488 NW 196TH TER HIA FL 33015 THOMAS WAGNER & MARY BEHR 419 NE 19 ST #502 MIA FL 33132 BRIAN J MICELI 419 N E 19 ST #503 MIA FL 33132 e pub1IF 16 03- 879 ., 3r�to the public (VETTE TERRACE CONDO. 1801 NE 4TH AVE. MIAMI, FL 33132 City LOTS 10-11. BLOCK 7. & PROP INT IN _& TO COMMON ELEMENTS NOT DEDICATED TO PUBLIC, MIRAMAR SUB. PB 5-4 (C-88) (18 UNITS) F#01-3231-037 (D-3/03) 101 102 201 202 203 204 301 302 103 304 DIONE RESTREPO 1801 NE 4 AVE #101 MIAMI FL 33132 A & G PALACIOS 1801 NE 4 AVE # 102 MIA FL 33132 ISSAC & JOAN SHIH 1801 NE4AVE #201 MIA FL 33132 CARMEN C MANGUANAGUA 1801 NE 4 AVE #202 MIA FL 33145 RAY D CARPENTER 1801 NE 4 AVE # 203 MIAMI FL 33132 CARLOS LUIS PACANINS 1801 NE 4 AVE #204 MIAMI FL 33132 LUIS R & MARIA NALVARTE 1801 NE 4 AVE #301 MIAMI FL 33132 JOSEPH L MTZ-AGULLO 6260 SW 28TH ST MIAMI FL 33155 STEVEN SANTIAGO 1801 NE 4TH AVE #303 MIA FL 33132 ALBERT W& S M DILTHEY) 3 r 879 424 SARAH COVE RD OTTO NC 28763 IVETTE TERR CONDO 1801 NE 4TH AVE. MIAMI, FL 33132 C-88 401 402 403 404 501 502 503 504 PIEDAD HERNANDEZ 1801 NE 4 AVE # 401 MIAMI FL 33132 ROBERTO HERNANDEZ 1801 NE 4 AVE #402 MIAMI FL 33132 CARLOS L PACANINS 1801 NE 4 AVE #403 MIAMI FL 33132 GUY J DEMASCOLO JR 1801 NE 4 AVE #404 MIAMI FL 33132 FRANCK C MAGLOIRE JR % LYNX AIR PO BOX 407139 FT LAUD FL 33340 A J &A C ROJAS 1801 NE 4 AVE #502 MIAMI FL 33132 CARLOS SANDOVAL 10990 SW 34TH ST MIAMI FL 33165 A J & A C ROJAS 1801 NE 4 AVE #504 MIAMI FL 33132 I.If 'o the public €ref -€til Cay ; „ Clerk 1013- 879 BAYSHORE TOWERS OF MIAMI CONDO. 1778 N BAYSHORE DR. MIAMI FL 33132 LOT 1 BLOCK 8 & PROP INT IN & TO COMMON ELEMENTS NOT DEDICATED TO PUBLIC MIRAMAR SUB. PB 5-4 (C-89) (34 UNITS) F01-3231-047 D-3/03 201 NIEVES MAZO % MARRERO ETALS, 2903 SALZEDO ST C GABLES FL 33134 301 MARIA ARIAS 2903 SALZEDO ST C GABLES FL 33134 401 NIEVES MAZO % MARRERO ETALS 2903 SALZEDO ST C GABLES FL 33134 501 ROSA MARRERO 2903 SALZEDO ST C GABLES FL 33134 601 MARIA ARIAS 2903 SALZEDO ST C GABLES FL 33134 102 NIEVES MAZO 1778 N BAYSHORE DR #102 MIA FL 33132 202 MARIA ARIAS % JULIO MARRERO 2903 SALZEDO ST C GABLES FL 33134 302 NIEVES MAZO % MARRERO ETALS 2903 SALZEDO ST —+ Submitll.-e d Into the public C GABLES FL 33134 402 Berl I2 Z-) j 03 NIEVES MAZO _.. _ prisi iiia fie -I'f 5`I"I` LOD � % MARRERO ETALS 2903 SALZEDO ST -City Clerk C GABLES FL 33134 502 ROSA MARRERO #J3- 879 2903 SALZEDO ST C GABLES FL 33134 8AYSHDRETOWERS OFMIAMI CONDO. 1778NBAYSHOREDR. MIAMI FL33132 602 N}EVESMAZO % MARRERDETALS 29038ALZEOOGT CGABLES FL33134 103 N(EVEGMAZO 1778NBAYSHOREDR#103 MIA FL33132 203 N|EVESM/ZI> 1535TREV|NOAVE CGABLES FL33134 303 MARIA ARIAS 2903GALZE0JST C GABLES FL 33134 403 MARIA ARIAS 3903SALZEOOST CGABLES FL33134 503 N|EVESMAZJ 96MARREROETALS 2903SAL2EDOGT CGABLES FL33134 603 N|EVESMAZO % MARREROBAB 2903SALZEDO8T C GABLES FL 33134 104 N|EVESMAZO 1778NBAYSHOREDR#104 MIA FL33132 pUh>'c ` vt I 204 `703 MARIA ARIAS &:96 �S�M JULIO MARRERO ' ^ Uy Clerk 2901SALZEDOST CGABLES FL33134 304 � ����� MARIA ARIAS �� � * � 2901SALZEDOGT CGABLES FL33134 BAYSHORE TOWERS OF MIAMI CONDO. 1778 N BAYSHORE DR. MIAMI FL 33132 C-89 404 NIEVES MAZO 1778 N BAYSHORE DR #404 MIA FL 33132 504 SHELDON SELTZER 1778 N BAYSHORE DR # 504 MIAMI FL 33132 604 NIEVES MAZO 1778 N BAYSHORE DR #604 MIA FL 33132 105 NIEVES MAZO 1778 N BAYSHORE DR #105 MIA FL 33132 205 NIEVES MAZO 1778 N BAYSHORE DR #205 MIA FL 33132 305 MARIA ARIAS 2903 SALZEDO ST C GABLES FL 33134 405 MARIA ARIAS 1535 TREVINO AVE C GABLES FL 33134 505 K & K & P & N CHATANI 1401 BAY RD #507 SL+ �� e ,� �h , publid MIA BCH FL 33139 If 22 -1 605 son ROSA MARRERO C-'Jity Clerk 2903 SALZEDO ST C GABLES FL 33134 2D6 NIEVES MAZO 1778 N BAYSHORE DR #206 MIA FL 33132 BAYSHORE TOWERS OF MIAMI CONDO. 1778 N BAYSHORE DR. MIA FL 33132 C-89 306 MARIA ARIAS 2903 SALZEDO ST C GABLES FL 33134 406 MARIA ARIAS 1535 TREVINO AVE C GABLES FL 33134 506 MARIA ARIAS 1535 TREVINO AVE C GABLES FL 33134 606 NIEVES MAZO 1778 N BAYSHORE DR #606 MIA FL 33132 03- 879 I DIREC'T'ORY OF PROJECT PRINCIPALS AND TEAM FOR METROPOLIS AT BAYSIIORE APPLICANTIDEVELOPER: METROPOLIS BAYSHORE TERRA -ADI INTERNATIONAL BAYSHORE, LLC 1200 BRICKELL AVENUE SUITE 680 MIAMI, FLORIDA 33131 TELEPHONE: (305) 416-4556 FACSIMILE: (305) 416-4560 CONTACT: DAVID MARTIN AND ROBERT MOREIRA ARCHITECT: NICHOLS, BROSCH, SANDOVAL & ASSOCIATES, INC. 161 ALMERIA AVENUE CORAL GABLES, FLORIDA 33134 TELEPHONE: (305) 443-5206 FACSIMILE: (305) 446-2872 CONTACT: BRUCE BROSCH AND MICHAELDA DESOUZA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: FUSTER DESIGN ASSOCIATES, P.A. 4961 S.W. 75 AVENUE 2ND FLOOR MIAMI, FLORIDA 33155 TELEPHONE: (305) 669-9191 FACSIMILE: (305) 669-8110 CONTACT: EMILIO FUSTER TRAFFIC: JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. 46 N.W. 94 STREET MIAMI SHORES, FLORIDA 33150,; �r1p the pUbiiC TELEPHONE: (305) 754-8695 th SITE UTILITY: VSN ENGINEERING prisci'la A. 8550 W. FLAGLER STREET City Clerk SUITE 113 MIAMI, FLORIDA 33144 TELEPHONE: (305) 551-6267 FACSIMILE: (305) 551-4542 ECONOMIST: SHARPTON, BRUNSON & COMPANY, P.A. 1 S.E. THIRD AVENUE, SUITE 2100 MIAMI, FLORIDA 33131 TELEPHONE: (305) 374-1574 FACSIMILE: (305) 372-8161 CONTACT: DARRYL SHARPTON AND TOM SCHOLSSER ATTORNEYS: GREENBERG TRAURIG, P.A. 1221 BRICKELL AVENUE MIAMI, FLORIDA 33131 TELEPHONE: (305) 579-0603 AND (305) 579-0736 FACSIMILE: (305) 961-0603 AND (305) 961-5736 CONTACT: LUCIA A. DOUGHERTY, ESQ. AND GLORIA M. VELAZQUEZ, ESQ. 03- 879 METROPOLIS AT BAYSHORE MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT PROJECT DESCRIPTION ARTICLE II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION A. ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 11000 1. SECTION 1304.2.1 2. SECTION 1702.2.1 3. SECTION 1702.2.2 4. SECTION 1702.2.3 APPLICATION FORMS; SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS GENERAL REPORT MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT CONCEPT PLAN DEVELOPMENT IMPACT STUDY c,, s 2 G'C k "33— 879 I METROPOLIS AT BAYSHORE MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT .�. PROJECT DESCRIPTION TZ ' Zoning Ordinance No. 11000 1. Section 1304.2.1 Application forms; supplementary materials (a) Statements of ownership and control of the proposed development of activity. The Disclosure of Ownership and Ownership Affidavit are provided in Article I, Tab B. (b) Statement describing in detail the character and intended use of the development or activity. The Metropolis at Bayshore is planned to be a phased high-rise residential condominium development project consisting of two interconnected towers with a total of 752 units. The proposed project will be constructed in two phases consisting of a 48 and 40 levels in each tower with 448 units in phase I and 304 units in phase II. Each tower will be independent of the other. In addition, there will be a total of 8,470 square feet of restaurant/retail/office space. Furthermore, the development will host a variety of amenities including a gym with steam room, outdoor swimming pool, meditation outdoor garden, within a total of approximately 69,750 square feet of recreational space and pool plaza area and approximately 848 parking spaces. Tab 6 of the supporting documents. The towers will be situated on approximately 1.506 acres or 65,595 net square feet of land located on North Bayshore Drive in Miami, Florida. The subject property is directly opposite the newly refurbished Margaret Pace Park located on Biscayne Bay. The main entrance to the project is through a beautifully landscaped driveway accessible from North Bayshore Drive and NE 4th Avenue. Entrance to the parking garage will be from the east side of the property along North Bayshore Drive. Building residents will be able to chose between valet parking or self parking. The majority of the tower units will have views of Biscayne Bay, the Downtown Miami skyline and surrounding areas to the Northwest of Downtown Miami. The architects, Nichols Brosch and Sandoval, while designing the buildings were sensitive to the North Bayshore scenic corridor, and therefore designed the building to step back on the north and south side allowing a greater feeling of openness to the pedestrian and automobiles traveling on North Bayshore Drive. In addition, the building was designed to minimize the 03- 879 impact of the parking garage along North Bayshore drive by outlining the garage with loft residential units. It was also intended for the towers to be placed as far back from North Bayshore Drive, which is residential in nature, while respecting the intent of the areas created along the Drive. (c) General location map, showing relation of the site or activity for which special permit is sought to major streets, schools, existing utilities, shopping areas, important physical features in and adjoining the project or activity and the like. The following exhibits are included with the Major Use Special Permit Application under Tab 1 of the Supporting Documents: (1) Map of the surrounding street system indicating the project location. (2) Aerial photograph of the surrounding area indicating the project site. (d) A site plan containing the title of the project and the names of the project planner and developer, date, and north arrow and, based on an exact survey of the property drawn to a scale of sufficient size to show: The site plan is located under Tab 6. The site plan includes the following: (1) Boundaries of the project, any existing streets, buildings, watercourses, easements and section lines; The boundaries of the project and the location of existing streets and easements are shown on the Survey located under Tab 5 of the Supporting Documents. (2) Exact location of all buildings and structures; See Tab 6. (3) Access and traffic flow and how vehicular traffic will be . separated from pedestrian and other types of traffic; A detailed analysis of the site access and traffic flow for the development is provided in the Traffic Impact Analysis located under Tab 2 of the Supporting Documents. Traffic circulation to the site will only occur from North Bayshore Drive and NE 4th Avenue. The service access to the development will enter and exit from the North end of the site on NE 4th Avenue.Y A h public �r 7.>., clean 2 E� Clerk 03- 879 (e) (4) Offstreet parking and offstreet loading areas; Offstreet parking will be located in the 11 -story parking garage. Loading and delivery parking will be located on the ground floor. (5) Recreational facilities locations; Recreational facilities for the development are shown located on the Site Plan under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. Amenities will include two (2) swimming pools, cafe, private fitness center, media room, social club area, covered recreation area, saunas and whirlpool and sundeck, spa, business center. (6) Screens and buffers; Landscaping and buffer areas are indicated on the Landscape Plan, under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (7) Refuse collections areas; Waste collection will be provided by a containerized compactor system located within the buildings. (8) Access to utilities and points of utilities hookups. Access and connections to site utilities are discussed in the Site Utility Study located under Tab 3 of the Supporting Documents. Tabulations of total gross acreage in the project and the percentages thereof proposed to be devoted to: (1) The various permitted uses and ground coverage of structures; Building footprint: 52,565 S.F. Floor Area: (F.A.R.) 819,300.S.F (2) Ground coverage by structures Ground coverage 52,565 sq. ft. (80%) Tabulation showing: Submitted Into the pubic' "� � item, P2 tit c3 "On City City aerk (1) The derivation of numbers of offstreet parking and offstreet loading spaces shown in (d) above; The total number of required parking spaces is 797 and 845 spaces are provided. 3 03- 879 4 (2) Total project density in dwelling units per acre. The Metropolis at Bayshore will consist of 752 residential units. Total project density is 500 dwelling units per net acre. (g) If common facilities (such as recreation areas of structures, private streets, common open space, etc.) are to be provided for the development, statements as to how such common facilities are to be provided and permanently maintained. Common facilities to be provided will include the two (2) swimming pools, cafe, private fitness center, media room, social club area, covered recreation area, saunas and whirlpool and sundeck, spa, business center. (h) Storm drainage and sanitary sewerage plans. Storm drainage, water distribution, waste water and solid waste generation provisions are discussed in the Site Utility Study located under Tab 3 of the Supporting Documents. (i) Architectural definitions for buildings in the development; exact number of dwelling units, sizes, and types, together with typical floor plans of each type. The development will consist of a residential high-rise building. The typical floor plans for residential units are included under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. 0) Plans for signs, if any. Signage approval will be addressed by Class II Permit at a later time. (k) Landscaping plan, including types, sizes and locations of vegetation and decorative shrubbery, and showing provisions for irrigation and future maintenance. The landscaping plan under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents, specifies the plant types, sizes and locations, as well as, indications that all planted areas will be fully irrigated and maintained by the owner and ultimately the condominium association. Subr,r,,ftr-d Into the public son City Clerk 03- 879 (1) Plans for recreation facilities, if any, including location and general description of buildings for such use. Recreational facilities for the development are shown located on the Site Plan under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. They include two (2) swimming pools, caf6, private fitness center, media room, social club area, covered recreation area, saunas and whirlpool and sundeck, a spa and a business center. (m) Such additional data, maps, plans, or statements as may be required for the particular use or activity involved. The Drawings Submitted with this Application are located under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (n) Such additional data as the applicant may believe is pertinent to the proper consideration of the site and development plan. 2. Section 1702.2.1 General Report. (1) Property ownership and beneficial interest within the boundaries of the area proposed for Major Use Special Permit. Statement of Ownership and beneficial interest within the boundaries of the area proposed for Major Use Special Permit are provided in Article I, Tab B. (2) The nature of the unified interest or control. The nature of unified interest or control is indicated in Article I, Tab B. (3) Survey of the proposed area showing property lines and ownership. A copy of the Surveys are included under Tab 5 of the Supporting Documents. (4) Map of existing features, including streets, alleys, easements, utilities lines, existing land use, general topography, and physical features. The existing site features and utility lines are shown on the Survey plans located under Tab 5 and the Site Utility Study, located under Tab 3 of the Supporting Documents. In addition, the following exhibits are included with the Major Use Special Permit Application. (5) Materials to demonstrate the relationship of the elements listed in (4) preceding to surrounding area characteristics. The Drawings Submitted with this Application are located under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. �� �-� 1�, E>� �,° e public on 1)3— 879 CiLyClak GAY lae the public g q City Uerk (6) Existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan designations for the area on and around the lands proposed for Major Use Special Permit. Pursuant to City of Miami Ordinance No. 11000, the existing zoning designation for the property is SD -6 Central Commercial -Residential District). Page 23 of the Zoning Atlas Map is located in Article I, Tab D and indicates the existing and surrounding zoning designations. However, since this property was recently rezoned to SD -6 the zoning map does not depict the current zoning. We have attached a letter from the Zoning Administrator indicating the zoning designation of the property as it currently stands, as well as Zoning Ordinance No. 12197 which rezoned the property to SD -6. The comprehensive plan future land use designation for the property is Restricted Commercial. We have included in Article I, Tab D, Zoning Ordinance No. 12196 which amended the future land use map to Restricted Commercial. The zoning designations and the comprehensive plan designation are consistent with one another. 3. Section 1702.2.2 Major Use Special Permit Concept Plan. a. Relationships of the concept plan to surrounding existing and proposed future uses. This Article contains a written narrative of this project outlining proposed uses, activities and architectural character. This narrative also contains descriptions of the project's relationship to traffic, pedestrian movements, and transportation access. Maps submitted indicate the project's relationship to surrounding streets, land uses and functions. Building elevations, sections and perspectives showing the proposed materials, vertical profile and height, and orientation to streets are included in the drawings submitted with this Application. The list of drawings submitted is found under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. b. Existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan principles and designations. This project conforms with the zoning designation of the property with the approval of the MUSP, and Class I and Class II permits. The proposed project is consistent with the comprehensive plan future land use designation for this property. Simultaneous requests have been made with this MUSP application for Class I and Class II permits, as well as, designation of as a phased development. 4. Section 1702.2,3 Developmental Impact Study. C a. A traffic analysis shall be submitted for an area within approximately 1/4 mile of the site, or an area including the major intersections to be impacted by the site, whichever is larger. 03' 879 The Traffic Impact Analysis is included under Tab 2 of the Supporting Documents. b. Economic impact data shall be provided, including estimates for construction costs, construction employment, and permanent employment and shall demonstrate that the proposed development is favorable to the economy, public services, environment and housing supply of the City. The Economic Impact Study is included under Tab 4 of the Supporting Documents. C. A housing impact assessment. The property will be a high-rise residential building. The City of Miami has a demand for additional housing. d. A description of proposed energy conservation measures shall be provided, including only those measures that are proposed in addition to the minimum requirements in State Energy Code. Architecturally, the building envelope will be comprised of insulated walls and roof and tinted/laminated glass. The building is equipped with modern mechanical equipment which are up to standard and energy efficient. e. Historic Buildings The property contains no historic buildings. L Environmental Zone The Property is not within a City of Miami Environmental Preservation District. public it 03- 879 METROPOLIS AT BAYSHORE MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS ARTICLE III. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS TAB 1 MINORITY CONSTRUCTION EMPLOYMENT PLAN TAB 2 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TAB 3 SITE UTILITY STUDY TAB 4 ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY TAB 5 SURVEY OF PROPERTY TAB 6 DRAWINGS SUBMITTED Submitted Into the pubtid P ,uOn City Clerk 03- 879 METROPOLIS AT BAYSHORE MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT MINORITY CONSTRUCTION EMPLOYMENT PLAN vubiitt-Nd ! ntrn the Public i C, P2-( 7) Gity Clark q3- S79 Into the public �n ith it MINORITY CONSTRUCTION EMPLOYMENT PLAN Citi' Clerk IT IS THE POLICY OF THE APPLICANT TO BASE ITS EMPLOYEE HIRING AND PROMOTIONS, AS WELL AS. ITS VENDOR AND CONTRACTOR HIRING, ON MERIT, QUALIFICATIONS AND COMPETENCY AND THAT ITS PERSONNEL PRACTICES WILL NOT BE INFLUENCED BY AN APPLICANT'S OR EMPLOYEE'S RACE, COLOR, PLACE OF BIRTH, RELIGION, NATIONAL ORIGIN, SEX, SEXUAL ORIENTATION, AGE, MARITAL STATUS, VETERAN AND HANDICAPPED STATUS. ONE OF THE MANAGEMENT DUTIES OF THE APPLICANT'S PRINCIPALS IS TO ENSURE THAT THE FOLLOWING PERSONNEL PRACTICES ARE BEING SATISFIED: 1. TAKE EVERY NECESSARY AFFIRMATIVE ACTION TO ATTRACT AND RETAIN QUALIFIED EMPLOYEES, REGARDLESS OF RACE, COLOR, PLACE OF BIRTH, RELIGION, NATIONAL ORIGINAL, SEX, SEXUAL ORIENTATION, AGE, MARITAL STATUS, VETERAN AND HANDICAPPED STATUS. 2. MAINTAIN EQUITABLE PRINCIPLES IN THE RECRUITMENT, HIRING, TRAINING, COMPENSATION AND PROMOTION OF EMPLOYEES. 3. MONITOR AND REVIEW PERSONNEL PRACTICES TO GUARANTEE THAT EQUAL OPPORTUNITIES ARE BEING PROVIDED TO ALL EMPLOYEES, REGARDLESS OF RACE, COLOR, PLACE OF BIRTH, RELIGION, NATIONAL ORIGIN, SEX, SEXUAL ORIENTATION, AGE, MARITAL STATUS, VETERAN AND HANDICAPPED STATUS. THE APPLICANT IS COMMITTED TO TAKE AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND AGGRESSIVELY PURSUE ACTIVITIES THAT WILL SERVE TO ENABLE ALL EMPLOYEES, VENDORS AND CONTRACTORS OPPORTUNITIES FOR EMPLOYMENT. SPECIFICALLY, THE APPLICANT SHALL UTILIZE THE FOLLOWING TO ACHIEVE THE ABOVE - REFERENCED POLICY: 1. RECRUITMENT/ADVERTISING ALL CONTRACTOR AND/OR EMPLOYMENT ADVERTISING WILL INCLUDE A STATEMENT OF EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY. 2. HIRING PROCEDURES ALL POSITIONS WILL BE FILLED WITHOUT REGARD TO RACE, COLOR, RELIGION, SEX OR NATIONAL ORIGIN. THE APPLICANT IS DEDICATED TO A POLICY OF EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES FOR MINORITIES. 3. PROMOTION PROCEDURES THE APPLICANT MAINTAINS EQUITABLE PRINCIPLES IN THE PROMOTION OF EMPLOYEES. THE MIAMI-DADE COUNTY COMMUNITY CAN ONLY IMPROVE IF THE LIFESTYLES OF EVERY SINGLE DISADVANTAGED GROUP IN THE COMMUNITY IS ADVANCED. WE WILL 03- 879 CONTINUALLY MONITOR AND REVIEW PERSONNEL AND CONTRACTOR EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES TO GUARANTEE THAT EQUAL OPPORTUNITIES ARE BEING PROVIDED TO ALL EMPLOYEES, VENDORS OR CONTRACTORS REGARDLESS OF RACE, COLOR, PLACE OF BIRTH, RELIGION, NATIONAL ORIGIN, SEX, SEXUAL ORIENTATION, AGE, MARITAL STATUS, VETERAN AND HANDICAPPED STATUS. 4. UTILIZATION OF LOCAL MINORITY BUSINESSES THE APPLICANT WILL ENDEAVOR TO UTILIZE BLACK MINORITY AND WOMEN -OWNED FIRMS. FURTHERMORE, IT WILL REQUIRE ALL OF ITS CONTRACTORS TO ALSO SOLICIT AND UTILIZE TO THE FULLEST EXTENT POSSIBLE MINORITY AND WOMEN -OWNED SUBCONTRACTORS AND VENDORS. ln.t) the public r, ein e hn Is City Clerk 2 03- 879 METROPOLIS BAYSHORE CONDOMINIUM TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Prepared for TERRA INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENTS, INC. 1200 Brickell Avenue Suite 680 Miami, Florida 33130 (305) 416-4556 by Jackson M. Ahlstedt, P.E. 46 N.W. 94th Street Miami Shores, Florida 33150 (305) 754-8695 SubrnY 4 d Into the public r t n I ite APRIL 2003 City Clerk ackson . AhIstedt, P.E. Florida Registrationv #28238 3 A"i'�?_ 51'74 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................ 1 2.0 PURPOSE OF STUDY ........................................... 3 3.0 STUDY AREA .................................................. 3 4.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS ... ..... .............................. 5 4.1 EXISTING ROADWAY CONDITIONS .......................... 5 4.2 EXISTING SIGNAL TIMING .................................. 6 4.3 EXISTING TRAFFIC COUNTS ................................ 6 4.3.1 PEAK HOURS .................................................. 10 4.3.2 PREVAILING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS .................... 14 4.4 MASS TRANSIT .......................................... 16 4.5 EXISTING LEVEL OF SERVICE .............................. 16 5.0 TRIP GENERATION ............................................. 19 6.0 TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT ................... 21 7.0 PROGRAMMED AND PLANNED ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS .......... 23 8.0 FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS WITHOUT THE PROJECT ............ 24 9.0 FUTURE CONDITIONS WITH PROJECT TRAFFIC .................... 29 10.0 ON -STREET PARKING .......................................... 33 11.0 PEDESTRIANS ................................................ 33 12.0 PROJECT SITE PLAN ........................................... 33 12.1 PROJECT DRIVEWAYS .................................... 33 12.2 PROJECT LOADING DOCK ................................. 34 12.3 PEDESTRIAN ACCESS .................................... 34 13.0 CONCLUSIONS ................................................ 34 SubmitfMinfo the mu0blic reclon"I i! y City Geri[ 03- 879- LIST OF TABLES TABLE 1 PROJECT DATA...........................................................1 TABLE 2 YEAR 2001 AVERAGE ANNUAL DAILY TRAFFIC (AADT) VOLUMES IN VEHICLES PER DAY (VPD) ....................................... 6 TABLE 3 YEAR 2001 WEEKLY ADJUSTMENT FACTORS ................................... 7 TABLE 4 YEAR 2001 WEEKLY AXLE ADJUSTMENT FACTORS .............................. 7 TABLE 5 SEASONAL ADJUSTMENT FACTORS ........... I .............................. 8 TABLE 6 EXISTING TRAFFIC BISCAYNE BOULEVARD BETWEEN NE 18TH STREET AND NE 19TH STREET ......... 9 TABLE 7 EXISTING TRAFFIC NE 19TH STREET EAST OF BISCAYNE BOULEVARD ............................. 10 TABLE 8 EXISTING AM & PM PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT DATA .............. 15 TABLE 9 EXISTING INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE WEEKDAY PEAK HOUR CONDITIONS ......................................... 16 TABLE 10 EXISTING LINK LEVEL OF SERVICE .......................................... 17 TABLE 11 PROJECT TRAFFIC........................................................19 TABLE 12 FINAL EXTERNAL PROJECT TRAFFIC ......................................... 20 TABLE 13 PEAK HOUR PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION ................................... 21 TABLE 14 PROGRAMMED AND PLANNED IMPROVEMENTS ............................... 23 TABLE 15 ANNUAL AADT GROWTH RATES ............................................. 24 TABLE 16 FUTURE PEAK. HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES WITHOUT PROJECT .............. 26 TABLE 17 FUTURE INTERSECTION LOS W/O PROJECT WEEKDAY PEAK HOUR CONDITIONS ......................................... 27 TABLE 18 FUTURE LINK LEVEL OF SERVICE WITHOUT PROJECT .......................... 27 TABLE 19 FUTURE PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES WITH PROJECT .................. 30 TABLE 20 FUTURE INTERSECTION LOS WITH PROJECT WEEKDAY PEAK HOUR CONDITIONS ......................................... 31 TABLE 21 FUTURE LINK LEVEL OF SERVICE WITH PROJECT .............................. 31 TABLE 22 AM AND PM PEAK HOUR DRIVEWAY VOLUMES ................................ 33 TABLE 23 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE SUMMARY WEEKDAY PEAK HOUR CONDITIONS ......................................... 35 Submitted Into the public reco'} Y R E th -� 03 I� iPIZ ,,i O n day clerk ij3W $'79. LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE 1 PROJECT LOCATION.......................................................Z FIGURE 2 STUDYAREA.............................................................. 4 FIGURE 3 PEAKING CHARACTERISTICS BISCAYNE BOULEVARD BETWEEN NE 18TH STREET & NE 19TH STREET ........... 12 FIGURE 4 PEAKING CHARACTERISTICS NE 19TH STREET EAST OF BISCAYNE BOULEVARD ............................. 13 FIGURE 5 EXISTING LEVELS OF SERVICE ............................................. 18 FIGURE 8 AM AND PM PEAK HOUR PROJECT TRAFFIC .................................. 22 FIGURE 7 FUTURE LEVELS OF SERVICE WITHOUT PROJECT ............................. 28 FIGURE 8 FUTURE LEVELS OF SERVICE WITH PROJECT ................................. 32 Submitted PlR€AC rec< `mss r stere ?2—1 PC City Clerk 03- 879 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The proposed Metropolis Bayshore Condominium project is a residential project consisting of approximately 752 dwelling units, a restaurant with approximately 3,833 square feet and 4,635 square feet of office space. The project includes approximately 848 on-site parking spaces. The site is located in the City of Miami on the south side of N.E. 19th Street/N.E. e Avenue where it meets North Bayshore Drive. Currently, the site is occupied by a vacant apartment building. The project will result in a net increase of approximately 258 vehicles per hour in the AM peak hour and 417 vehicles per hour in the PM peak hour. Based upon existing count data, the AM volume is approximately 9% of the total two-way AM peak hour volume on Biscayne Boulevard. The PM volume is approximately 13% of the total two- way PM peak hour volume on Biscayne Boulevard. Vehicular access to the site is restricted to two, two-way driveways. One driveway connects to North Bayshore Drive: The other driveway connects to an alley adjacent to the west side of the property. In addition, there is a pick-up drop-off valet area on the north side of the site along N.E. 19th Street/N.E. 4th Avenue. Two types of level of service analysis were conducted. The first type of analysis included Intersection and roadway link level of service analysis. The second type of analysis consisted of transportation corridor analysis. For purposes of identifying the specific localized impacts of the project, level of service analysis was conducted for the existing year 2003 conditions, and future conditions in the year 2005 with and without the project. These analyses included link and intersection level of service analysis. After reviewing the results from the intersection analysis and the roadway link. analysis, it was determined that, with or without the project, by the year 2005 there will be some deterioration in the level of service on Biscayne Boulevard. The project has a impact on the level of service at the intersection of N.E. 19th Street and Biscayne Boulevard. The Metropolis Condominium project as well as the Biscayne Village and 1800 Club projects would benefit from improvements to the intersection of N.E. 19th Street and Biscayne Boulevard. These improvements include providing protected/permitted northbound and southbound left turn phases in the traffic signal and re -striping the eastbound and westbound approaches to provide left tum lanes. Finally, the transportation corridor analysis clearly indicates that there is sufficient transportation system capacity in the Biscayne Boulevard Corridor to accommodate the proposed project. SubrY,0*T Into the public �`th 6 e 03- 8'79 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Metropolis Bayshore Condominium is a two phase development consisting of luxury condominiums and parking. As shown in Figure 1, the site is located on the south side of N.E. 19th Street/N.E. 4th Avenue. The proposed development is summarized in Table 1. TABLE 1 PROJECT DATA The residential component of the project consists of luxury condominium apartments. Vehicular access to the site is restricted to two, two-way driveways. One driveway connects to North Bayshore Drive. The other driveway connects to the alley adjacent to the west side of the property. In addition, there is a pick-up drop-off valet area on the east side of the site along N.E. 19th Street/N.E. 4th Avenue. For purposes of this traffic impact analysis, build -out has been estimated to occur by the year 2005. JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. ^y1 a ryryyy'FEaAFa<^j o he public re," i, C{. ' '1 dC 6 METROPOLIS BAYSHORE CONDOMINIUM April 29, 2003 Page 1 033. 879 - I 1w.1-17 RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM 752 DU RESTAURANT 3,833 SF OFFICE 4,635 SF PARKING 848 SPACES The residential component of the project consists of luxury condominium apartments. Vehicular access to the site is restricted to two, two-way driveways. One driveway connects to North Bayshore Drive. The other driveway connects to the alley adjacent to the west side of the property. In addition, there is a pick-up drop-off valet area on the east side of the site along N.E. 19th Street/N.E. 4th Avenue. For purposes of this traffic impact analysis, build -out has been estimated to occur by the year 2005. JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. ^y1 a ryryyy'FEaAFa<^j o he public re," i, C{. ' '1 dC 6 METROPOLIS BAYSHORE CONDOMINIUM April 29, 2003 Page 1 033. 879 - FIGURE 1 PROJECT LOCATION JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. METROPOLIS BAYSHORE CONDOMINIUM April 29,2003 Subrr,.ittodl Into the pubk2 471: 03- 879 C, -4, t, y ie v k NTS NE 36TH STREET NW 29TH STREET z m ui w z z Lu z cLu Im B I SCAYNE BAY Lf) zoC14 ir- 0 z N z z Lm z NW 20TH STIEET PROJECT IV EN ETIAN CAUSEWAY 1 1-395 Fl FIGURE 1 PROJECT LOCATION JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. METROPOLIS BAYSHORE CONDOMINIUM April 29,2003 Subrr,.ittodl Into the pubk2 471: 03- 879 C, -4, t, y ie v k 2.0 PURPOSE OF STUDY The primary purpose of this study is to assess the impacts of vehicular traffic on signalized intersections and roadways within the study area due to the proposed development by conducting a roadway link and signalized intersection level of service analysis. In addition, the report provides a general assessment of project impacts on parking and pedestrians. Specific items discussed are as follows: ■ Determination of existing traffic volumes and levels of service for major roadways within the study area; ■ Estimation of the number of trips generated by the proposed project and the distribution of these trips within the study area network. ■ Estimation of future background and project traffic conditions and levels of service; ■ Determination of whetherthe transportation impacts of the proposed project exceed the City of Miami concurrency standards, and solutions to mitigate any adverse impacts; ■ Determination of project impacts on on -street parking; and, ■ Determination of project impacts on pedestrians. 3.0 STUDY AREA The study area's boundaries were defined to include: NE 23rd Street as the northern boundary, NE 15th Street as the southern boundary, Biscayne Bay as the eastern boundary, and NE 2nd Avenue as the western boundary. The area includes a one-half mile section of Biscayne Boulevard. Figure 2 shows the intersections and roadway links which are most significant to the project. These include the following intersections: NE 19th Street and Biscayne BoulevardR , ;� g K,qe�, The roadway links include the following:`"s h Biscayne Boulevard from NE 15th Street to NE 23rd Street qty ierk JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. METROPOLIS BAYSHORE CONDOMINIUM April 29, 2003 Page 3 03- 879 FIGURE 2 STUDY AREA JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. METROPOLIS BAYSHORE CONDOMINIUM April 29, 2003 Page 4 03- 879 Clerk NTS 1-195 NE36TH STREET NW29TH STREET w z LU w z cn BISCAYNE BAY ( ' STUDY AREA w w 0 z C14 z NW20TH ST m It 0 z REET w ZD z < z w z PROJECT woop ji'l VENETIAN CAUSEWAY ]-395 FIGURE 2 STUDY AREA JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. METROPOLIS BAYSHORE CONDOMINIUM April 29, 2003 Page 4 03- 879 Clerk 4.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS The study area was surveyed to observe existing traffic conditions, identify parking locations, identify traffic count locations, and to collect traffic count data. 4.1 EXISTING ROADWAY CONDITIONS This section describes the characteristics of selected roadways in the study area. Key roadways in and/or near to the study area include Biscayne Boulevard (SR-5/US-1), NE 13th Street, NE 15th Street and NE 36th Street. Of these roadways, Biscayne Boulevard is by far the most significant roadway serving the proposed project. Local access to the site is provided by NE 19th Street and North Bayshore Drive. Biscayne Boulevard (SR-S/US-1) Biscayne Boulevard is a four lane divided roadway with striped median between NE 15th Street and NE 23rd Street. Turn lanes are provided at intersections. Traffic signals are located at: • NE 15th Street • NE 17th Street • NE 17th Terrace • NE 19th Street • N E 21 st Street • NE 22nd Street This equates to five signalized intersections within one-half mile. The posted speed limit is 30 mph. For purposes of analysis, Biscayne Boulevard was classified as a State Two- way Arterial, Class III. NE 19th Street NE 19th Street is a two lane roadway. NE 19th Street is classified as a local roadway. Traffic on NE 19th Street is controlled by traffic signals at Biscayne Boulevard and NE 2nd Avenue. North Bayshore Drive North Bayshore Drive is a two lane roadway with metered parking on either side. The cross-section consists of approximately 42' of pavement. North Bayshore Drive is classified as a local roadway. Traffic on North Bayshore Drive is controlled by a southbound stop sign at the intersection with NE 17th Terrace. JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. METROPOLIS BAYSHORE CONDOMINIUM April9 2003 P.2 �� — 8 17a �a ' r0k 4.2 EXISTING SIGNAL TIMING Existing signal timing data for the signalized intersections to be analyzed was obtained from the Miami -Dade County Traffic Control Center. This data was used in the intersection capacity analysis to determine each intersection's level of service (LOS) and in the roadway link analysis. 4.3 EXISTING TRAFFIC COUNTS There are two existing Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) traffic count stations location within or near the study area. Data for these traffic count stations is summarized in Table2. TABLE 2 YEAR 2001 AVERAGE ANNUAL DAILY TRAFFIC (AADT) VOLUMES IN VEHICLES PER DAY (VPD) 5053 SR 5/US-1, 109 NORTH OF NE 13TH NB 22,000 SB 16,000 38,000 STREET 5056 SR 5/US-1, 209 NORTH OF NE 19TH NB 19,000 SB 18,500 37,500 STREET Source: Florida Department of Transportation, Transportation Statistics Office. Original 24 Hour machine traffic counts were taken the week of January 20, 2003 at the following locations: •Biscayne Boulevard between NE 18th Street and NE 19th Street • . NE 19th Street east of Biscayne Boulevard The count program provided machine traffic counts (without vehicle classifications) summarized every 15 minutes for a 24-hour period. Machine traffic count data is summarized in Tables 6 and 7. Turning movement counts were obtained as follows: • At the intersection of NE 19th Street and Biscayne Boulevard on Thursday, January 16, 2003 between 7:00 AM and 9:00 AM and between 4:00 PM and 6:00 PM. JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. METROPOLIS BAYSHORE CONDOMINIUM SL i� sl #10,, 2003 Page 6 item City Clerk 03- 879 This traffic count data, adjusted to reflect peak hour volumes for Average Annual Daily Traffic conditions is summarized in Table 8. Weekly Volume Factors Weekly volume factors to adjust raw count data to Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) volumes were obtained from FDOT records for the year 2001. Rather than using county- wide factors, Miami -Dade County North factors were used. These factors are shown in Table 3. TABLE 3 YEAR 2001 WEEKLY ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Source: Florida Department of Transportation, Transportation Statistics Office. Axle Adjustment Factors Weekly axle adjustment factors to adjust raw count data to Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volumes were obtained from FDOT records for the year 2001. Rather than using county- wide factors, factors for SR-5/Biscayne Boulevard were used. These factors are shown in Table 4. TABLE 4 YEAR 2001 WEEKLY AXLE ADJUSTMENT FACTORS ra-� 4 cey 4 '^. f 4 1/21/01 1/27/01 0.96 FIG Source: Florida Department of Transportation, Transportation Statistics Office. Axle Adjustment Factors Weekly axle adjustment factors to adjust raw count data to Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volumes were obtained from FDOT records for the year 2001. Rather than using county- wide factors, factors for SR-5/Biscayne Boulevard were used. These factors are shown in Table 4. TABLE 4 YEAR 2001 WEEKLY AXLE ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Source: Florida Department of Transportation, Transportation Statistics Office. JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. c..n F" Public ,-qtA&.dA14! b < e,cri b8,3 bewdl$gd] cf oa��N:y.�]� ._ Ch"y Clerk METROPOLIS BAYSHORE CONDOMINIUM April 29, 2003 Page 7 03- 879 x�y Cs -1 cw 4 1/21/01 1/27/01 0.96 Source: Florida Department of Transportation, Transportation Statistics Office. JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. c..n F" Public ,-qtA&.dA14! b < e,cri b8,3 bewdl$gd] cf oa��N:y.�]� ._ Ch"y Clerk METROPOLIS BAYSHORE CONDOMINIUM April 29, 2003 Page 7 03- 879 Peak Season Adjustment Factors Peak season adjustment factors to adjust count data were obtained from FDOT records for the years 1999 through 2001. Consistent with the FDOT 2002 Quality/Level of Service Handbook, the median weekly factorforthe thirteen highest consecutive weeks of the year (the peak season) for each of the three years was determined. The seasonal adjustment factor was determined to be 1.027. These factors are shown in Table 5. TABLE 5 SEASONAL ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Source of yearly data: Florida Department of Transportation, Transportation Statistics Office. The significance of the peak season adjustment factor is that it shows that there is less than a 3% difference between average annual daily traffic and peak season traffic. This is well within the ability to accurately measure and/or estimate traffic volumes. The roadways in question are not seasonal roadways and average annual daily conditions are not significantly different than peak season conditions. QtY Clerk JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. METROPOLIS BAYSHORE CONDOMINIUM April 29, 2003 Page 8 03- 879 TABLE 6 EXISTING TRAFFIC BISCAYNE BOULEVARD BETWEEN NE 18TH STREET AND NE 19TH STREET RAW DATA NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND 2 -WAY ADT 19,294 19,951 39,245 AM PEAK HOUR 1,668 1,389 3,057 MID-DAY PK HR 1,112 1,220 2,332 PM PEAK HOUR 1,521 1,718 3,239 WEEKLY ADJUSTMENT FACTOR 1.02 AXLE ADJUSTMENT FACTOR 0.96 ADJUSTED DATA NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND 2 -WAY AADT 18,900 19,500 38,400 AM,PEAK HOUR 1,630 1,360 2,990 MID-DAY PK HR 1,090 1,190 2,280 PM PEAK HOUR 1,490 1,680 3,170 PERCENTAGE OF DAILY TRAFFIC DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND AADT N/A 49% 51% AM PEAK HOUR 7.79% 55% 45% MID-DAY PK HR 5.94% 48% 52% PM PEAK HOUR 8.26% 47% 53% K(100) 1 8.48% 47% 53% JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. 4 r FIGCii� Geek METROPOLIS BAYSHORE CONDOMINIUM April 29, 2003 Page 9 03- 879 „ . ! Into the public c oj"� 4v,,,, �' i tt hn TABLE 7 City G9ea'k EXISTING TRAFFIC NE 19TH STREET EAST OF BISCAYNE BOULEVARD RAW DATA EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 2 -WAY ADT 932 2,592 3,524 AM PEAK HOUR 58 150 208 MID-DAY PK HR 65 170 235 PM PEAK HOUR 86 267 353 WEEKLY ADJUSTMENT FACTOR 1.02 AXLE ADJUSTMENT FACTOR 0.96 ADJUSTED DATA EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 2 -WAY AADT 900 2,500 3,500 AM PEAK HOUR 60 150 200 MID-DAY PK HR 60 170 230 PM PEAK HOUR 80 260 350 PERCENTAGE OF DAILY TRAFFIC DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION EASTBOUND WESTBOUND AADT N/A 26% 71% AM PEAK HOUR 5.71% 30% 75% MID-DAY PK HR 6.57% 26% 74% PM PEAK HOUR 10.00% 23% 74% K(100) 10.27% 23% 74% 4.3.1 PEAK HOURS This section identifies characteristics of existing peak hour traffic in the study area. These characteristics include AM and PM peak hours, Planning Analysis Hour Factor (K►oo) factors and Directional Distribution (D) factors. JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. METROPOLIS BAYSHORE CONDOMINIUM April 29, 2003 Page 10 03- 879- Biscayne Boulevard The peaking characteristics of Biscayne Boulevard between NE 18th Street and NE 19th Street are presented graphically in Figure 3. As can be seen from Figure 3, this section of Biscayne Boulevard experiences the following three peaks. An AM Peak of approximately 7.79% beginning at 8:00am A mid-day peak of approximately 5.94% beginning at 2:00pm A PM Peak of approximately 8.26% beginning at 4:45pm The K100 for this section of roadway was estimated to be 8.48%. The D factor for this section of roadway was estimated to be 53.00%. NE 19th Street The peaking characteristics of NE 19th Street east of Biscayne Boulevard are presented graphically in Figure 4. As can be seen from Figure 4, this section of NE 19th Street experiences the following three peaks. An AM Peak of approximately 5.71 % beginning at 8:15am A mid-day peak of approximately 6.57% beginning at 2:00pm A PM Peak of approximately 10.00% beginning at 5:45pm The K100 for this section of roadway was estimated to be 10.27%. The D factor for this section of roadway. was estimated to be 74.29%. r City Clerk JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. METROPOLIS SAYSHORE CONDOMINIUM April 29, 2003 Page 11 — 4 BISCAYNE BOULEVARD BETWEEN NE 18TH STREET & NE 19TH STREET 10.0096 8.00%- 0 IL Ii H J 6.00% 0 LL 0 W Q 4.00% H Z W 0: W 0. 20096 0 0:00 52 10:00 15:00 20:00 HOUR BEGINING FIGURE 3 PEAKING CHARACTERISTICS BISCAYNE BOULEVARD BETWEEN NE 18TH STREET & NE 19TH STREET JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. METROPOLIS BAYSHORE CONDOMINIUM April 29, 2003 12 b. P866 rF-a h 93- 879 City Clerk i NE 19TH STREET EAST OF BISCAYNE BOULEVARD 12.00% 10.00% ILA I 8.00% 6.00% 4.00% 2.00% %1k 04 0 0:00 52 101.00 15:00 20:00 HOUR BEGINING FIGURE 4 PEAKING CHARACTERISTICS NE 19TH STREET EAST OF BISCAYNE BOULEVARD JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. METROPOLIS SAYSHORE CONDOMINIUM April 29, 2003 Submitted Into the public Page 13 record E i0s wi h p 6 G'dy- as A - city Clerk 0)3- 87T 4.3.2 PREVAILING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS This section describes the traffic conditions on selected roadways and at selected intersections in the study area. Biscayne Boulevard Although heavy during peak hours, traffic flow on the section of Biscayne Boulevard in the study area is basically reasonably acceptable. Signal progression appears to be good. NE 19th Street Due to the minimal amount of traffic, traffic flow on NE 19th Street is good. Interestingly enough the data indicates a disproportionate amount of westbound traffic on N.E. 19th Street east of Biscayne Boulevard and a relatively high percentage of westbound right turns at the intersection of N.E. 19th Street and Biscayne Boulevard. This is likely due to westbound afternoon traffic from the Venetian and MacArthur Causeways attempting to avoid congestion on Biscayne Boulevard in the area of the Cultural Center and Omni. JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. City Clerk METROPOLIS SAYSHORE CONDOMINIUM April 29, 2003 Page 14 o)3— 879 TABLE 8 EXISTING AM & PM PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT DATA Source: Original traffic counts taken January 16, 2003. Note: Data has been adjusted to reflect AM and PM peak. hour volumes for Average. Annual Daily Traffic conditions. sofa "� „^.,.y,. 8�1. dl-fe7 rul"f"r JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. METROPOLIS BAYSHORE CONDOMINIUM April 29, 2003 Page 15 03- 879 - P2-1 _1_ -7 CiLly Clerk JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. METROPOLIS BAYSHORE CONDOMINIUM April 29, 2003 Page 15 03- 879 - 4.4 MASS TRANSIT The site is located within the Biscayne Boulevard Corridor. Transit routes providing capacity to the corridor are MetroBus Routes 3, 16, 32, 36, 62, 95, T, Biscayne Max, 9, 10, and 6. 4.5 EXISTING LEVEL OF SERVICE Each of the selected intersections were analyzed to determine their level of service. The Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) 2000 methodology based Highway Capacity Software, HCS Version 4.1c was used. The results are shown in Table 10 and on Figure 5. The intersection level of service analyses are included in Appendix A. Link analysis, based upon AM and PM peak hour directional volumes, was also performed for the section of Biscayne Boulevard between NE 15th Street and NE 23rd Street using the FDOTARTPLAN 2002 (June 2002) software and FDOT 2002 Quality/Level of Service Handbook, Table 4-7. The results of these analyses are summarized in Table 11. TABLE 9 EXISTING INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE WEEKDAY PEAK HOUR CONDITIONS JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. C 5 B /v PUNi n -1 a i011 City Clef k METROPOLIS BAYSHORE CONDOMINIUM April 29, 2003 Page 16 'J3- 879 - TABLE 10 EXISTING LINK LEVEL OF SERVICE Notes: 1.) AM Peak Hour Directional Service Volumes are taken from ARTPLAN analysis using a cycle length of 90 seconds and average G/C of 0.57. 2.) PM Peak Hour Directional Service Volumes are taken from ARTPLAN analysis using a cycle length of 115 seconds and average G/C of 0.63. 3.) Maximum peak hour directional volumes are calculated from year 2001 FDOT data for count station 5056 (AADT = 37,500; K= 8.17%; and, D = 53.49%) and escalated by 2% per year for two years. JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. ra.�"14, 17 METROPOLIS BAYSHORE CONDOMINIUM April 29, 2003 Page 17 03- 879 Biscayne Boulevard NE 15th Street NE 23rd Street AM=D PM=D ARTPLAN LOS CRITERIA LOS MAXIMUM PEAK HOUR PEAK HOUR DIRECTIONALVOLUME A B C D E (VPH) AM Peak Hour Directional NA NA 1360 2000 2170 1,705 Service Volume (VPH) PM Peak Hour Directional NA 480 1680 2260 2400 1,705 Service Volume VPH Notes: 1.) AM Peak Hour Directional Service Volumes are taken from ARTPLAN analysis using a cycle length of 90 seconds and average G/C of 0.57. 2.) PM Peak Hour Directional Service Volumes are taken from ARTPLAN analysis using a cycle length of 115 seconds and average G/C of 0.63. 3.) Maximum peak hour directional volumes are calculated from year 2001 FDOT data for count station 5056 (AADT = 37,500; K= 8.17%; and, D = 53.49%) and escalated by 2% per year for two years. JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. ra.�"14, 17 METROPOLIS BAYSHORE CONDOMINIUM April 29, 2003 Page 17 03- 879 1 NE 20TH STREET C!B NE 19TH STREET NE 18TH STREET NE 17TH TERR PROJECT JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. FIGURE 5 EXISTING LEVELS OF SERVICE METROPOLIS BAYSHORE CONDOMINIUM April 29, 2003 ��t?F7sse ern! Page 18 Pd. bli(t at E,yxr; n o 3 City Clerk 0 Iz W m w Q z Lu s� o z< Lu U m Z m Z F LINK PEAK HOUR LOS C!B AM/PM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION LOS Clay Clerk JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. FIGURE 5 EXISTING LEVELS OF SERVICE METROPOLIS BAYSHORE CONDOMINIUM April 29, 2003 ��t?F7sse ern! Page 18 Pd. bli(t at E,yxr; n o 3 City Clerk 5.0 TRIP GENERATION � c t EfrA� i t the, public 6C.fic "k R, 't4M1 th sv idea P2 -t 7 ..r . P. li.Y Clerk The total number of vehicular trips generated by the project was determined for the AM and PM peak hours using the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) publication, Trip Generation, 6th Edition. The number of vehicular trips generated by the project was based on the total number of condominium units, using data for ITE Land Use Code 230 plus the number of restaurant trips, using data for ITE Land Use Code 831 and the number of office trips using data for ITE Land Use Code 710. These trips are the total number of vehicular trips generated by the project before adjusting for internal trips, and pedestrian and mass transit trips. TABLE 11 PROJECT TRAFFIC WEEKDAY IN 1,808 172 63 2,043 1 VPD OUT 1,808 172 63 2,043 VPD TOTAL 3,617 345 125 4,087 VPD AM PEAK HOUR OF ADJACENT STREET IN 43 2 14 59 VPH OUT 209 1 2 212 VPH TOTAL 252 3 16 271 VPH PM PEAK HOUR OF ADJACENT STREET IN 218 19 14 252 VPH OUT 107 9 70 187 VPH TOTAL 326 29 84 439 VPH Although it is likely that there will be a significant percentage of internalized trips between the condominium, restaurant and office space; the limited amount of restaurant and office space will not generate a particularly large number of trips. No adjustment was made to JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. METROPOLIS RAYSHORE CONDOMINIUM April 29, 2003 Page 19 93- 879 allow for internalized trips. It has been assumed that the restaurant will be successful enough to draw clientele from beyond the residents and visitors to the condominium. Because of its proximity to MetroBus routes and the nature of the area, it is anticipated that 5% of the person trips will use mass transit or walk. These person trips will not negatively effect the traffic conditions, and therefore, are not included in the vehicle trips distributed throughout the study area. The remaining 95% of the person trips generated by the project were distributed throughout the study area as vehicle trips. Table 12 summarizes external trips for the project after accounting for modal splits. TABLE 12 FINAL EXTERNAL PROJECT TRAFFIC AM PEAK HOUR OF ADJACENT STREET IN 41 2 13 56 VPD OUT 199 1 2 201 VPD TOTAL 240 3 15 258 VPD PM PEAK HOUR OF ADJACENT STREET IN 207 18 14 239 VPH OUT 102 9 67 178 VPH TOTAL 309 27 80 417 VPH As can be seen from Table 12, the estimated number of vehicle trips entering the project during the AM peak hour is 56 vph. The estimated number of vehicle trips leaving the project during the AM peak hour is 201 vph. The estimated number of vehicle trips entering the project during the PM peak hour is 239 vph. The estimated number of vehicle trips leaving the project during the PM peak hour is 178 vph. JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. METROPOLIS BAYSHORE CONDOMINIUM April 29, 2003 SUtmtod Wo the public' Page 20 03 3 �� 1 6.0 TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT The project site is located in Traffic Analysis Zone JAZ) 505 (note that this is the new zone numbering system). The cardinal distribution of the traffic within TAZ 505 was obtained from Miami -Dade County. The distribution is as follows: North -Northeast 9.89% East -Northeast 3.86% East -Southeast 4.71% South -Southeast 3.70% South -Southwest 20.92% West -Southwest 23.40% West -Northwest 16.84% North -Northwest 16.68% The distribution of AM and PM project trips is summarized in Table 13. Based upon this trip distribution, the project trips were assigned to the roadway network. This is shown in Figure 6. , TABLE 13 PEAK HOUR PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION �•Fry f �' d! 4 '.r 1 t��3rel 'd d c'bo-®F JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. METROPOLIS BAYSHORE CONDOMINIUM April 29, 2003 Page 21 03- 879 FIGURE 6 AM AND PM PEAK HOUR PROJECT TRAFFIC JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. METROPOLIS BAYSHORE CONDOMINIUM April 29, 2003 Page 22 03- 879- 17173 62155 NE 20TH STREET 17173 1172 �- 49144 NE 19TH STREET -)► PROJECT 22196 [14159 NE 18T STREET E 17TH ERR 49144 14159 9) 3111 W > C] 0 m � w W 4 � m � z 45199 AM/PM PEAK HOUR PROJECT TRAFFIC IN VPH'°.Public P'2-1 71 FIGURE 6 AM AND PM PEAK HOUR PROJECT TRAFFIC JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. METROPOLIS BAYSHORE CONDOMINIUM April 29, 2003 Page 22 03- 879- 7.0 PROGRAMMED AND PLANNED ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS Programmed and planned improvements in or near the study area were identified using the Metro -Dade Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), 2002. These improvements are detailed in Table 14. None of these improvements add capacity to the transportation system. TABLE 14 PROGRAMMED AND PLANNED IMPROVEMENTS JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. METROPOLIS SAYSHORE CONDOMINIUM April 29, 2003 Page 23 t33- 879 8.0 FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS WITHOUT THE PROJECT Future traffic conditions without the project were analyzed. Future traffic consisting of background traffic and committted development traffic was estimated. Background traffic was estimated by applying an annual growth factor to existing traffic. The annual growth factor of 2% per year was developed based upon the historical traffic count data shown in Table 15. TABLE 15 ANNUAL AADT GROWTH RATES VOLUMES IN VEHICLES PER DAY (VPD) "`.v- t "��, '� 5i%= A' H, �"�''�';.,A. u�"9+kr ma'.�s �,°:r• -s �e. ~p�y�s '�^aY�,^kic� fin: �'4' ix .as '$ 4t3 ppX�``tnk . xt a; �'�.�" !1,�a+.��.£s,zwreS�":s�.::�,p+.ra_ u'`;i""�k'-R•k. 47_k..e'11, rc 'iia° F•� 1 11 NORTH OF 111 :111 13TH STREET 1 • R 5/US-1, 200'NORTH OF : •. 111 it 19TH STREET Future traffic conditions were analyzed for year 2005. The growth rate of 2% per year was applied to the 2001 FDOT traffic counts and the 2003 original traffic count volumes in order to achieve 2005 traffic volumes. In addition, City of Miami data on major committed developments was researched and the traffic associated with those developments was included in the analysis. These developments consisted of the following projects: • Biscayne Bay Towers • Cultural Center • Miramar Center II w ,, i@C • 1800 Cluba Biscayne Village, • Tuttle Street • Sky Residences • Bay 25 • Platinum Condominium Table 16 provides the future traffic volumes without the project and shows these volumes with the associated movement. These volumes were used to determine intersection level of service by using the same software programs as used for the previously described analysis. The intersection level of service for the future traffic volumes without the project are shown JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. METROPOLIS BAYSHORE CONDOMINIUM April 29, 2003 Page 24 /J3- 879 in Table 17 and on Figure 7. The analysis shows a slight deterioration in the intersection level of service during the AM peak hour. In general, the values are generally the same as those for the year 2003. The intersection level of service analyses are included in Appendix B. The link level of service analysis for future AM and PM peak hour directional traffic conditions was performed on the previously identified roadway link. These results are summarized in Table 18. JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. Public P Z Duh a jy �.A yy METROPOLIS BAYSHORE CONDOMINIUM April 29, 2003 Page 25 ij3— 879 TABLE 16 FUTURE PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES WITHOUT PROJECT JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. < D METROPOLIS SAYSHORE CONDOMINIUM April 29, 2003 Page 26 03- 87g TABLE 17 FUTURE INTERSECTION LOS W/O PROJECT WEEKDAY PEAK HOUR CONDITIONS NE 19TH STREET AND BISCAYNE I F D BOULEVARD TABLE 18 FUTURE LINK LEVEL OF SERVICE WITHOUT PROJECT A a Sam Biscayne Boulevard NE 15th Street NE 23rd Street AM=E PM=E ARTPLAN LOS CRITERIA LOS MAXIMUM PEAK HOUR PEAK HOUR DIRECTIONALVOLUME A B C D E (VPH) AM Peak Hour Directional NA NA 1360 2000 2170 2108 Service Volume (VPH) PM Peak Hour Directional NA 480 1680 2260 2400 2268 Service Volume VPH Notes: 1.) AM Peak Hour Directional Service Volumes are taken from ARTPLAN analysis using a cycle length of 90 seconds and average G/C of 0.57. 2.) PM Peak Hour Directional Service Volumes are taken from ARTPLAN analysis using a cycle length of 115 seconds and average G/C of 0.63. 3) Maximum peak hour directional volumes are calculated from year 2001 FDOT data for count station 5056 (AADT = 37,500; K= 8.17%; and, D = 53.49%) escalated by 2% per year for four years and includes committed development traffic. the public 9 �RiE e ✓on City Kik JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. METROPOLIS BAYSHORE CONDOMINIUM April 29, 2003 Page 27 03- 879 FIGURE 7 FUTURE LEVELS OF SERVICE WITHOUT PROJECT JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. METROPOLIS BAYSHORE CONDOMINIUM April 29, 2003 Page 28 03- 879 E NE 20TH STREET Fro NE 19TH STREET PROJECT NE 18TH STREET NE 17TH TERR D w m U) w Lu oc o m Q N < w Z m Z F LINK PEAK HOUR LOS C1B AM/PM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION LOS z.zblic lerk FIGURE 7 FUTURE LEVELS OF SERVICE WITHOUT PROJECT JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. METROPOLIS BAYSHORE CONDOMINIUM April 29, 2003 Page 28 03- 879 9.0 FUTURE CONDITIONS WITH PROJECT TRAFFIC Future traffic conditions with project traffic were analyzed for the year 2005. This was accomplished by using the 2005 estimated traffic volumes without the project and adding the traffic generated by the project (as shown in Table 13). Table 19 details the future traffic plus project traffic volumes for the AM and PM peak hours. These volumes were then used to determine the intersection levels of service using the same procedures as previously stated. For the most part, there were only minor changes between the year 2005 future intersection level of service and the year 2005 future background plus project volumes. This is shown in Table 20 and on Figure 8. The intersection level of service analyses are included in Appendix C. The link level of service analysis for future AM and PM peak hour directional traffic conditions with the project was performed on the previously identified roadway links. These results are summarized in Table 21. JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. pz l METROPOLIS BAYSHORE CONDOMINIUM April 29, 2003 Page 29 03- 87& TABLE 19 FUTURE PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES NTH PROJECT R ^ a iut✓.. h ., S9� C"i ty G1 ' JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. METROPOLIS BAYSHORE CONDOMINIUM April 29, 2003 Page 30 03- 87 TABLE 20 FUTURE INTERSECTION LOS WITH PROJECT WEEKDAY PEAK HOUR CONDITIONS TABLE 21 FUTURE LINK LEVEL OF SERVICE WITH PROJECT Notes: 1.) AM Peak Hour Directional Service Volumes are taken from ARTPLAN analysis using a cycle length of 90 seconds and average G/C of 0.57. 2.) PM Peak Hour Directional Service Volumes are taken from ARTPLAN analysis using a cycle length of 115 seconds and average G/C of 0.63. 3) Maximum peak hour directional volumes are calculated from year 2001 FDOT data for count station 5056 (AADT = 37,500; K= 8.17%; and, D = 53.49%) escalated by 2% per year for four years and incl udes committed development traffic and project traffic.: Hr�r�.4R, I rt • ztSlC JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. METROPOLIS BAYSHORE CONDOMINIUM April 29, 2003 Page 31 - 879 NE 15th Street NE 23rd Street AM=E PM=E Biscayne Boulevard ARTPLAN LOS CRITERIA LOS MAXIMUM PEAK HOUR PEAK HOUR DIRECTIONALVOLUME A B C D E (VPH) AM Peak Hour Directional NA NA 1360 2000 2170 2157 Service Volume (VPH) PM Peak Hour Directional NA 480 1680 2260 2400 2327 Service Volume VPH Notes: 1.) AM Peak Hour Directional Service Volumes are taken from ARTPLAN analysis using a cycle length of 90 seconds and average G/C of 0.57. 2.) PM Peak Hour Directional Service Volumes are taken from ARTPLAN analysis using a cycle length of 115 seconds and average G/C of 0.63. 3) Maximum peak hour directional volumes are calculated from year 2001 FDOT data for count station 5056 (AADT = 37,500; K= 8.17%; and, D = 53.49%) escalated by 2% per year for four years and incl udes committed development traffic and project traffic.: Hr�r�.4R, I rt • ztSlC JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. METROPOLIS BAYSHORE CONDOMINIUM April 29, 2003 Page 31 - 879 FIGURE 8 FUTURE LEVELS OF SERVICE WITH PROJECT JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. METROPOLIS BAYSHORE CONDOMINIUM April 29, 2003 Page 32 *J3- 879 - 10.0 ON -STREET PARKING There are no metered parking spaces on either side of N.E. 19th Street. Adjacent to the site, along North Bayshore Drive there are parking meters. The project may result in the elimination of a minimal amount of existing on -street parking spaces on the east side of North Bayshore Drive. The project will construct some 848 on-site parking spaces. Parking will be provided for residents, employees and visitors to the site. 11.0 PEDESTRIANS Little pedestrian activity was noted in the immediate vicinity of the site. There are pedestrian provisions in the traffic signal at Biscayne Boulevard and N.E, 19th Street. The proposed project will not significantly impact pedestrian movements along N.E. 19th Street or North Bayshore Drive. 12.0 PROJECT SITE PLAN Traffic and transportation aspects of the proposed site plan were reviewed and analyzed. 12.1 PROJECT DRIVEWAYS The proposed project includes two, two-way driveways serving the site. Table 22 summarizes the AM and PM peak hour driveway volumes anticipated at the service points. TABLE 22 AM AND PM PEAK HOUR DRIVEWAY VOLUMES IN VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH) 0 -ill" T,�� JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. METROPOLIS BAYSHORE CONDOMINIUM April 29, 2003 Page 33 �� o= 03— 879 City Clerk Queuing analysis was conducted based upon the assumption that access to the garage will be controlled by a card reader system and consist of an inbound lane and an outbound lane. Analysis of potential inbound queues for the AM and PM peak hours indicates that there is better than a 95% probability that the queue should not exceed 4 vehicles in addition to the vehicle being processed. Analysis of potential outbound queues for the AM and PM peak hours indicates that there is better than a 95% probability that the queue should not exceed 3 vehicles in addition to the vehicle being processed. The lobby level plan, provided by the project architect, and dated 01/13/03 indicates that the proposed control point would be well within the property and that the anticipated queues can be accommodated without impacting off-site traffic flows. 12.2 PROJECT LOADING DOCK The proposed site plan includes a loading dock area on the alley on the west side of the property. The loading dock area consists of two 12' by 55' berths and one compactor berth. This should be adequate to serve the type and magnitude of development anticipated. The loading dock is accessed via from the alley on the west side of the project. Loading dock maneuvering will have no impacts on traffic flow and pedestrian movements on N.E. 4th Avenue, N.E. 19th Street, or North Bayshore Drive. 12.3 PEDESTRIAN ACCESS The proposed site plan provides principle pedestrian access to N.E. 19th Street/ N.E. 4th Avenue and North Bayshore Drive. 13.0 CONCLUSIONS After reviewing the results from the intersection analysis and the roadway link analysis, that with or without the project, by the year 2005 there will be some deterioration in the level of service on Biscayne Boulevard. The signalized intersection analysis indicates that, although overall delay can be improved within the same level of service, the potential reduction in level of service at Biscayne Boulevard and N.E. 19th Street can not be mitigated through revisions in signal timing. The roadway link analysis yields similar level of service results, indicating that roadway levels of service remain relatively consistent through the year 2005 with or without the project. JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. METROPOLIS SAYSHORE CONDOMINIUM April 29, 2003 h tet_€ {A Page 34 R, P2 1 ? a .j3 879 The results of all of these analyses are shown in Table 23. Finally, the corridor analysis provided in Appendix D clearly indicates that there is sufficient transportation system capacity in the Biscayne Boulevard Corridor to accommodate the proposed project. TABLE 23 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE SUMMARY WEEKDAY PEAK HOUR CONDITIONS JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. METROPOLIS BAYSHORE CONDOMINIUM April 29, 2003 Page 35 03- 879 .fires METROPOLIS BAYSHORE CONDOMINIUM April 29, 2003 Page 35 03- 879 APPENDIX A Existing Intersection Levels of Service PJ3- 879 �.I As - .._.- _ city city PJ3- 879 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1c Analyst: J. AELSTEDT Inter.: 2390 Agency: I L T R I I I Area Type: All other areas Date: 1/24/2003 Jurisd: CITY OF MIAMI/FDOT Period: AM PEAK HOUR Year : EXISTING Project ID: METROPOLIS BAYSHORE 13 19 109 144 751 2 E/W St: NE 19TH STREET NIS St: BISCAYNE BOULEVARD SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A I NB Left P Thru A I Thru P Right A I Right P Peds I Peds WB Left A I SB Left P Thru A I Thru P Right A I Right P Peds ► Peds NB Right I EB Right SB Right I WB Right Green 26.0 56.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 All Red 0.0 0.0 Cycle Length: 90.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) V/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound LT 435 ► Eastbound i Westbound ► Northbound ► Southbound I C I L T R 1 L T R I L T R I L T R I I I No. Lanes I ► 0 1 1 I I 0 1 1 I I 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 LGConfig I LT R I LT R I L TR I L TR I Volume 115 7 57 13 19 109 144 751 2 130 1791 37 I Lane Width 1 11.0 11.0 1 11.0 11.0 111.0 11.0 111.0 11.0 I RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 I Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A I NB Left P Thru A I Thru P Right A I Right P Peds I Peds WB Left A I SB Left P Thru A I Thru P Right A I Right P Peds ► Peds NB Right I EB Right SB Right I WB Right Green 26.0 56.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 All Red 0.0 0.0 Cycle Length: 90.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) V/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound LT 435 1505 0.09 0.29 23.5 C 23.8 C R 438 1516 0.16 0.29 24.0 C Westbound LT 491 1701 0.10 0.29 23.5 C 24.6 C R 438 1516 0.27 0.29 25.1 C Northbound L 80 127 0.61 0.62 40.7 D TR 2106 3385 0.38 0.62 8.9 A 10.8 B Southbound L 346 556 0.11 0.62 7.5 A TR 2099 3374 0.94 0.62 25.7 C 25.4 C Intersection Delay = 21.4 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C METROPOLIS BAYSHORE CONDOMINIUM Appendix A April 29, 2003 Page A-1 1 �.t�.'�'9r Y.4 i 03- 879 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I I I i I ► No. Lanes ► 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 LGConfig I LT R I LT R I L TR I L TR I Volume 136 11 54 13 26 149 164 1475 7 129 1178 41 I Lane Width 1 11.0 11..0 ► 11.0 11.0 111.0 11.0 111.0 11.0 I RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 I Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A I NB Left P Thru A I Thru P Right A I Right P Peds I Peds WB Left A I SB Left P Thru A ( Thru P Right A I Right P Peds I Peds NB Right I EB Right. SB Right I WB Right Green 26.0 81.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 All Red 0.0 0.0 Cycle Length: 115.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) V/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound I HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1c Analyst: J. AHLSTEDT Inter.: 2390 Agency: D 36.5 D R 343 Area Type: All other areas Date: 1/24/2003 D Jurisd: CITY OF MIAMI/FDOT Period: PM PEAK HOUR Year : EXISTING Project ID: METROPOLIS BAYSHORE 35.4 D 40.3 D E/W St: NE 19TH STREET N/S St: BISCAYNE BOULEVARD SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I I I i I ► No. Lanes ► 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 LGConfig I LT R I LT R I L TR I L TR I Volume 136 11 54 13 26 149 164 1475 7 129 1178 41 I Lane Width 1 11.0 11..0 ► 11.0 11.0 111.0 11.0 111.0 11.0 I RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 I Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A I NB Left P Thru A I Thru P Right A I Right P Peds I Peds WB Left A I SB Left P Thru A ( Thru P Right A I Right P Peds I Peds NB Right I EB Right. SB Right I WB Right Green 26.0 81.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 All Red 0.0 0.0 Cycle Length: 115.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) V/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound LT 323" 1428 0.19 0.23 36.3 D 36.5 D R 343 1516 0.23 0.23 36.7 D Westbound LT 397 1755 0.11 0.23 35.4 D 40.3 D R 343 1516 0.56 0.23 41.4 D Northbound L 205 291 0.38 0.70 12.2 B TR 2383 3383 0.64 0.70 10.6 B 10.6 B Southbound L 148 210 0.28 0.70 10.8 B TR 2372 3368 0.56 0.70 9.2 A 9.3 A Intersection Delay = 13.2 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B METROPOLIS BAYSHORE CONDOMINIUM Appendix A April 29, 2003 C.Page A-2 E.. qty Clerk 8-79 APPENDIX B Future Intersection Levels of Service Without Project t3:�kw c A k 03-i 879 HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1c Analyst: J. AHLSTEDT Inter.: 2390 Agency: Area Type: All other areas Date: 1/24/2003 Jurisd: CITY OF MIAMI/FDOT Period: AM PEAK HOUR Year : FUTUTRE W/O PROJECT Project ID: METROPOLIS BAYSHORE E/W St: NE 19TH STREET NIS St: BISCAYNE BOULEVARD SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY ► Eastbound ► Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I I L T R ► L T R L L T R I L T R ► I I I No. Lanes 1 0 1 1 ( 0 1 1 ► 1 2 0 I 1 2 0 I LGConfig ► LT R ► LT R ► L TR ► L TR Volume 116 12 59 1134 27 125 146 1152 41 145 2184 39 I Lane Width I 11.0 11.0 I 11.0 11.0 111.0 11.0 111.0 11.0 I RTOR Vol ► 0 I 0 1 0 I 0 I Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A ► NB Left P Thru A ► Thru P Right A I Right P Peds ► Peds WB Left A I SB Left P Thru A I Thru P Right A I Right P Peds I Peds NB Right I EB Right SB Right I WB Right Green 26.0 56.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 All Red 0.0 0.0 Cycle Length: 90.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound LT 214 741 0.24 0.29 25.0 C 24.5 C R 438 1516 0.17 0.29 24.1 C Westbound LT 363 1257 1.63 0.29 325.8 F 269.2 F R 438 1516 0.31 0.29 25.4 C Northbound L 80 127 0.64 0.62 43.6 D TR 2088 3356 0.62 0.62 11.9 B 13.1 B Southbound L 166 267 0.34 0.62 13.6 B TR 2101 3376 1.14 0.62 88.3 F 86.6 F Intersection Delay = 92.2 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = F METROPOLIS BAYSHORE CONDOMINIUM Appendix B April 29, 2003 ubliC�' Page B-1 o `J3- 819 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I L T R I L T R I L T R I 'L T R 1 ► I t I I No. Lanes I 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 2 0 I 1 2 0 I LGConfig I LT R I LT R I L TR I L TR 1 Volume 138 20 56 142 31 158 166 1898 139 189 1598 43 1 Lane Width ► 11.011.0 I 11.0 11.0 111.0 11.0 111.0 11.0 I RTOR Vol ► 0 1 0 1 0 I 0 I Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4► 5 6 7 8 EB Left A I NB Left P Thru A I Thru P Right A ► Right P Peds I Peds WB Left A I SB Left P Thru A I Thru P Right A I Right P Peds I Peds NB Right I EB Right SB Right 1 WB Right Green 26.0 81.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 All Red 0.0 0.0 Cycle Length: 115.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound LT 314 1387 HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1c Analyst: J. AHLSTEDT Inter.: 2390 Agency: 0.23 36.8 Area Type: All other areas Date: 1/24/2003 Jurisd: CITY OF MIAMI/FDOT Period: PM PEAK HOUR Year : FUTURE W/0 PROJECT Project ID: METROPOLIS BAYSHORE 37.5 D E/W St: NE 19TH STREET NIS St: BISCAYNE BOULEVARD SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I L T R I L T R I L T R I 'L T R 1 ► I t I I No. Lanes I 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 2 0 I 1 2 0 I LGConfig I LT R I LT R I L TR I L TR 1 Volume 138 20 56 142 31 158 166 1898 139 189 1598 43 1 Lane Width ► 11.011.0 I 11.0 11.0 111.0 11.0 111.0 11.0 I RTOR Vol ► 0 1 0 1 0 I 0 I Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4► 5 6 7 8 EB Left A I NB Left P Thru A I Thru P Right A ► Right P Peds I Peds WB Left A I SB Left P Thru A I Thru P Right A I Right P Peds I Peds NB Right I EB Right SB Right 1 WB Right Green 26.0 81.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 All Red 0.0 0.0 Cycle Length: 115.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound LT 314 1387 0.24 0.23 36.8 D 36.8 D R 343 1516 0.24 0.23 36.8 D Westbound LT 329 1453 0.31 0.23 37.5 D 40.8 D R 343 1516 0.59 0.23 42.5 D Northbound L 99 140 0.81 0.70 60.6 E TR 2336 3317 0.97 0.70 29.3 C 30.3 C Southbound L 63 88 2.02 0.70 525.1 F TR 2375 3372 0.75 0.70 12.8 B 47.0 D Intersection Delay = 37.9 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = D METROPOLIS BAYSHORE CONDOMINIUM Appendix B April 29, 2003 Page B-2 CILY Clerk03- 87-9 APPENDIX C Future Intersection Levels of Service With Project 03- 879 - SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1c Analyst: J. AHLSTEDT Inter.: 2390 Agency: I L T R ► I Area Type: All other areas Date: 4/29/2003 Jurisd: CITY OF MIAMI/FDOT Period: AM PEAK HOUR Year : FUTUTRE W/PROJECT Project ID: METROPOLIS BAYSHORE ► L TR I Volume E/W St: NE 19TH STREET NIS St: BISCAYNE BOULEVARD SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left A I NB Left P Thru A I Thru P Right A I Right P Peds I Peds WB Left A I SB Left P Thru A I Thru P Right A I Right P Peds I Peds NB Right I EB Right SB Right I WB Right Green 26.0 56.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 All Red 0.0 0.0 Appr/ Lane Lane Group Grp Capacity Cycle Length: 90.0 secs _Intersection Performance Summary Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Flow Rate (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound ► Eastbound ► Westbound ► Northbound I Southbound I I L T R I T R I L T R I L T R ► I No. Lanes I I I I 1 1 2 0 I ► 1 2 0 1 0 1 1 ► 0 1 1 LGConfig I LT R I LT R I L TR ► L TR I Volume 116 34 59 1183 108 187 146 1152 55 162 2184 39 1 Lane Width 1 11.0 11.0 1 11.0 11.0 111.0 11.0 111.0 11.0 I ,RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left A I NB Left P Thru A I Thru P Right A I Right P Peds I Peds WB Left A I SB Left P Thru A I Thru P Right A I Right P Peds I Peds NB Right I EB Right SB Right I WB Right Green 26.0 56.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 All Red 0.0 0.0 Appr/ Lane Lane Group Grp Capacity Cycle Length: 90.0 secs _Intersection Performance Summary Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Flow Rate (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound LT 215 743 0.41 0.29 27.1 C 25.8 C R 438 1516 0.17 0.29 24.1 C Westbound LT 336 1163 2.82 0.29 859.9 F 711.8 F R 438 1516 0.47 0.29 27.1 C Northbound L 80 127 0.64 0.62 43.6 D TR 2082 3346 0.64 0.62 12.1 B 13.3 B Southbound L 159 255 0.48 0.62 19.4 B TR 2101 3376 1.14 0.62 88.3 F 86.2 F Intersection Delay = 204.4 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = F METROPOLIS BAYSHORE CONDOMINIUM Appendix C April 29, 2003 nublid, Page C-1 I b J�J City Clerk 03- 879 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound ► Westbound ► Northbound I Southbound I ► L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I ► ► ► I I No. Lanes ► 0 1 1 I 0 1 1 I 1 2 0 I 1 2 0 I LGConfig ► LT R I LT R I L TR I L TR I Volume 138 116 56 186 103 213 166 1898 198 1162 1598 43 1 Lane Width 1 11.0 11.0 1 11.0 11.0 111.0 11.0 111.0 11.0 I RTOR Vol ► 0 ► 0 1 0 I 0 I Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4► 5 6 7 8 EB Left A I NB Left P Thru A ► Thru P Right A I Right P Peds I Peds WB Left A I SB Left P Thru A I Thru P Right A ( Right P Peds I Peds NB Right ► EB Right SB Right I WB Right Green 26.0 81.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 All Red 0.0 0.0 Cycle Length: 115.0 secs Appr/ Lane Lane Group Grp Capacity _Intersection Performance Summary Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Flow Rate (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1c Analyst: J. AHLSTEDT Inter.: 2390 Agency: 0:23 107.2 Area Type: All other areas Date: 4/29/2003 1516 Jurisd: CITY OF MIAMI/FDOT Period: PM PEAK HOUR Year : FUTURE W/PROJECT Project ID: METROPOLIS BAYSHORE E/W St: NE 19TH STREET NIS St: BISCAYNE BOULEVARD SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound ► Westbound ► Northbound I Southbound I ► L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I ► ► ► I I No. Lanes ► 0 1 1 I 0 1 1 I 1 2 0 I 1 2 0 I LGConfig ► LT R I LT R I L TR I L TR I Volume 138 116 56 186 103 213 166 1898 198 1162 1598 43 1 Lane Width 1 11.0 11.0 1 11.0 11.0 111.0 11.0 111.0 11.0 I RTOR Vol ► 0 ► 0 1 0 I 0 I Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4► 5 6 7 8 EB Left A I NB Left P Thru A ► Thru P Right A I Right P Peds I Peds WB Left A I SB Left P Thru A I Thru P Right A ( Right P Peds I Peds NB Right ► EB Right SB Right I WB Right Green 26.0 81.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 All Red 0.0 0.0 Cycle Length: 115.0 secs Appr/ Lane Lane Group Grp Capacity _Intersection Performance Summary Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Flow Rate (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound LT 214 946 1.00 0:23 107.2 F 87.8 F R 343 1516 0.24 0.23 36.8 D Westbound LT 161 711 1.64 0.23 358.6 F 203.9 F R 343 1516 0.80 0.23 54.3 D Northbound L 99 140 0.81 0.70 60.6 E TR 2319 3293 1.04 0.70 46.4 D 46.9 D Southbound L 63 88 3.67 0.70 1255 F TR 2375 3372 0.75 0.70 12.8 B 155.9 F Intersection Delay =106.0 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = F METROPOLIS BAYSHORE CONDOMINIUM Appendix C April 29, 2003 Page C-2 ��I✓V�o", 4...661 «..f bf ki e'ir� Ly Aark 03- 879 HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1c Analyst: J. AHLSTEDT Inter.: 2390 Agency: Area Type: All other areas Date: 4/29/2003 Jurisd: CITY OF MIAMI/FDOT Period: AM PEAK HOUR Year : FUTUTRE W/PROJECT Project ID: METROPOLIS BAYSHORE - MODIFIED INTERSECTION E/W St: NE 19TH STREET NIS St: BISCAYNE BOULEVARD SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left P I NB Left A P Thru P I Thru A P Right P I Right A P Peds I Peds WB Left A P I SB Left A P Thru A P I Thru A P Right A P 1 Right A P Peds I Peds NB Right I EB Right SB Right 1 WB Right Green 21.1 6.0 26.5 31.9 Yellow 3.0 4.0 3.0 4.0 All Red 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Length: 99.5 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 74' 1230 0.41 0.06 60.7 E TR 99 1635 1.33 0.06 250.3 F 215.2 F Westbound Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I I I No. Lanes I I 1 1 0 I I 1 1 0 I 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 I LGConfig I L TR I L TR I L TR I L TR I Volume 116 34 59 1183 108 187 146 1152 55 162 2184 39 1 Lane Width 112.0 11.0 112.0 11.0 111.0 11.0 111.0 11.0 I RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 I Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left P I NB Left A P Thru P I Thru A P Right P I Right A P Peds I Peds WB Left A P I SB Left A P Thru A P I Thru A P Right A P 1 Right A P Peds I Peds NB Right I EB Right SB Right 1 WB Right Green 21.1 6.0 26.5 31.9 Yellow 3.0 4.0 3.0 4.0 All Red 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Length: 99.5 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 74' 1230 0.41 0.06 60.7 E TR 99 1635 1.33 0.06 250.3 F 215.2 F Westbound L 446 1752 .1.64 0.30 331.4 F TR 500 1653 0.84 0.30 44.8 D 226.8 F Northbound L 72 116 0.71 0.62 40.3 D TR 2065 3346 0.64 0.62 12.7 B 13.8 B Southbound L 154 249 0.50 0.62 13.1 B TR 2083 3376 1.15 0.62 94.6 F 92.0 F Intersection Delay = 105.1 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = F METROPOLIS BAYSHORE CONDOMINIUM Appendix C April 29, 2003 Bars nPage C-3 Pcg2sciJa A, Uy C,llama X33-� HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1c Analyst: J. AHLSTEDT Inter.: 2390 Agency: Area Type: All other areas Date: 4/29/2003 Jurisd: CITY OF MIAMI/FDOT Period: PM PEAK HOUR Year : FUTURE W/PROJECT Project ID: METROPOLIS BAYSHORE - MODIFIED INTERSECTION E/W St: NE 19TH STREET NIS St: BISCAYNE BOULEVARD SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Duratign 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A 1 NB Left A P Thru A I Thru A P Right A I Right A P Peds I Peds WB Left A I SB Left A P Thru A I Thru A P Right A I Right A P Peds I Peds NB Right I EB Right SB Right I WB Right Green 23.5 19.3 61.3 Yellow 4.0 3.0 4.0 All Red 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Length: 115.1 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) V/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 64 314 0.73 0.20 78.1 E TR 346 1695 0.72 0.20 50.0 D 54.5 D Westbound I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I I No. Lanes I 1 1 1 0 I 1 1 1 0 I 1 1 2 0 I 1 1 2 0 I LGConfig I L TR I L TR I L TR I L TR I Volume 138 116 56 186 103 213 166 1898 198 1162 1598 43 1 Lane Width 112.0 11.0 112.0 11.0 111.0 11.0 111.0 11.0 1 RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 Duratign 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A 1 NB Left A P Thru A I Thru A P Right A I Right A P Peds I Peds WB Left A I SB Left A P Thru A I Thru A P Right A I Right A P Peds I Peds NB Right I EB Right SB Right I WB Right Green 23.5 19.3 61.3 Yellow 4.0 3.0 4.0 All Red 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Length: 115.1 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) V/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 64 314 0.73 0.20 78.1 E TR 346 1695 0.72 0.20 50.0 D 54.5 D Westbound L 123 603 0.93 0.20 106.2 F TR 329 1610 1.28 0.20 194.3 F 175.4 F Northbound L 109 150 0.73 0.73 31.7 C TR 2392 3293 1.01 0.73 35.7 D 35.5 D Southbound L 63 85 3.67 0.73 1253 F TR 2449 3372 0.72 0.73 10.2 B 153.5 F Intersection Delay = 95.1 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = F METROPOLIS BAYSHORE CONDOMINIUM Appendix C April 29, 2003 Page C-4 torr ��3- cro9 APPENDIX D Corridor Analysis the PA j5 iter CR Clerk 03- 879 INTRODUCTION A level of service analysis was conducted using the techniques contained in the adopted Transportation Element of the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000. These techniques are contained in the City of Miami publication Transportation Corridors: Meeting the Challenge of Growth Management in Miami as revised September 1990. In performing the analysis, of the three possible scenarios available, Scenario 2 - maximum auto was used. The level of service analysis for Metropolis Bayshore Condominium is documented in Tables 1 through 4. The proposed project is located in the Biscayne Boulevard corridor. The roadways providing capacity to the corridor are: Biscayne Boulevard N.E. 2nd Avenue North Miami Avenue The transit routes providing capacity to the corridor are MetroBus Routes 3, 16, 32, 36, 62, 95, T, Biscayne Max, 9, 10, and 6. EXISTING 2003 LEVEL OF SERVICE Table 1 presents an analysis of the existing 2003 corridor level of service. Roadway vehicular capacities (column 2) were based upon data contained in Transportation Corridors: Meeting the Challenge of Growth Management in Miami as revised September 1990. Roadway vehicular volumes (column 4) were taken from FDOT traffic count data. This AADT volume was adjusted to reflect peak hour conditions by applying factors obtained from FDOT data. Mass Transit person trip capacities (columns 8, 9 and 10) were calculated from route schedules and equipment information supplied by the Miami -Dade Transit Agency (MDTA) and data contained in Transportation Corridors: Meeting the Challenge of Growth Management in Miami as revised September 1990. Average weekday ridership data was obtained from MDTA. Total route ridership was available for MetroBus. Additionally, MDTA provided an estimated percentage of person trips during the peak 4 hours of the day. METROPOLIS BAYSHORE CONDOMINIUM April 29, 2003 PAGE D-1 s 03 City Clerk - 03- 879 Because the MetroBus data reflected ridership on the entire route, some percentage of which is typically outside of the Biscayne Boulevard Corridor, it was necessary to estimate the portion of the total route ridership which was actually on the buses when they were in the corridor. To facilitate this estimate of segment volumes, 1999 through 2002 data on MetroBus boardings in the corridor was obtained from MetroBus surveys. Transit volumes (column 12) were calculated using the ridership data and the percentage of passengers during the peak hours supplied by MDTA and estimating ridership in the corridor from actual load factors calculated from the MetroBus survey data. Thus, the transit' volumes shown in column 12 reflect actual load factors calculated from MDTA surveys. As can be seen from Table 1, the existing Biscayne Boulevard Corridor currently operates at Level of Service "A". METROPOLIS BAYSHORE CONDOMINIUM April29, 2003 Subn" '';'d !? �,-) Vhe. publi t: y` PAGE D-2 03- 879 CORRIDOR NAME f Principal Roadway(s) BISCAYNE CORRIDOR Biscayne Boulevard (5058) I MetroBus Rte 3 MetroBus Rte 16 MetroBus Rte 32 MetroBus Rte 36 MetroBus Rte 62 MetroBus Rte 95 MetroBus Rte T MetroBus Rte MAX Biscayne Boulevard Subtotal N.E. 2nd Avenue (276) MetroBus Rte 9 MetroBus Rte 10 N.E. 2nd Avenue Subtotal Miami Avenue (308) MetroBus Rte 6 Miami Avenue Subtotal TOTAL LOS TABLE 2003 CORR TYPE (1) LS 0.70 B LOCAL BU; 0.71 C I TOTAL CAPACITY 0.80 C TRANSIT DESIGN 0.81 D F @ LOAD= 0.90 D DESIGN 392 0.91 E (12) 400 1.00 E 221 400 1.01 F F 3,221 A 400 33 AVO 734 205 A SEATS A HEAD 400 PER A WAY B VEH MetroBus Rte 3 830 20 43.2 MetroBus Rte 16 548 20 43.6 MetroBus Rte 32 1,033 20 43.0 MetroBus Rte 36 7 20 - 44.5 MetroBus Rte 62 27 10 40.8 MetroBus Rte 95 15 44.7 MetroBus Rte T 20 44.4 MetroBus Rte MAX15 43.3 MetroBus Rte 9 10 46.0 MetroBus Rte 10 40 45.6 MetroBus Rte 6 60 11.5 METROPOLIS CONDOMINIUM April 29, 2003 ROADWAY VEHICULAR CAPACITY (2) 2,720 2,720 2,720 2,720 2,720 2,720 6,160 AUTO PERSON TI TRANSIT PERSON TOTAL PERSON T RIDERSHIP PAX PER HOUR ROADWA) PER. TRIP CAPACITY @PPV= 1.4 (3) 3,808 3,808 3,808 3,808 3,808 3,808 11,424 tips TRIPS RIPS DESIGN LOAD FACTOR 167 150.00% 148 150.00% 48 150.00% 33 150.00% 89 150.00% 2 125.00% 154 150.00% 189 150-00% 280 150.00% 47 150.00% 7 150.00% 1,164 ROAD% ROADWAY VEHICULAR VOLUME (4) 3,186 3,188 1,841 1,641 789 789 5,618 7,865 1,164 CAPACITY 447 400 519 828 205 34 TABLE VAY MODE ROADWAY PER. TRIP VOLUME @PPV= 1.4 (5) 4,463 4,463 2,297 2.297 1,105 1,105 7,865 87.11% 12.89% 100.00% lip 14.38% 12.68% 4.12% 2.82% 7.67% 0.17% 13.22% 16.21% 24.05% 4.05% 0.62% 100.00% 1 - EXIS ROADWAI EXCESS PER. TRIP CAPACITI (6) (655) (655) 1,511 1,511 2,703 2,703 3,559 TING 201 ' ROADWAI PERSON TRIP V/C (7) 1.17 1.17 0.60 0.60 D.29 0.29 0.69 73 LEVEL OF LOCAL BU; PER. TRIP I TOTAL CAPACITY LOS @ LOAD = TRANSIT DESIGN CAPACITY (8) F @ LOAD= TRIP 389 DESIGN 392 CAPACITY 387 (12) 400 389 734 221 400 148 519 F 3,221 A 400 33 828 734 205 A 1,033 A 445 400 34 A 34 B 4,289 SERVIC EXPRESS PER. TRIF CAPACITI @ LOAD = DESIGN (9) 447 447 0 0 447 E MVAC` MASS TRAI1 RAIL TRAI` PER. TRIP CAPACITY @ LOAD = DESIGN (10) 0 0 ASIS SIT MODE I TOTAL TOTAL TRANSIT TRANSIT TRANSIT PERSON CAPACITY PERSON TRIP @ LOAD= TRIP EXCESS DESIGN VOLUME CAPACITY (11) (12) (13) 389 167 221 392 148 245 387 48 339 400 33 367 734 89 645 447 2 445 400 154 248 519 189 331 3,668 830 2,839 828 280 548 205 47 158 1,033 327 708 34 7 27 34 7 27 4,736 1,164 3,572 PERSON TRIP CAPACITY (14) 3,808 389 392 387 400 734 447 400 519 7,476 3,808 828 205 4,841 3,808 34 3,843 16,160 CORRI CORRIDOF PERSON TRIP VOLUME (15) 4,463 167 148 48 33 89 2 154 189 5,292 2,297 280 47 2,624 1,105 7 1,112 9,029 )OR TOTAL CORRIDOF PERSON TRIP EXCESS CAPACITY (16) (655) 221 246 339 367 645 445 246 331 2,184 1,511 548 158 2,217 2,703 27 2,730 7,131 3 CORRIDOF PERSON TRIP V/C (17) 1.17 0.43 0.38 0.12 0.08 0.12 0.00 0.39 0.38 0.71 0.60 0.34 0.23 0.54 0.29 0.21 0.29 0.56 F A A A A A A A A B A A A A A A A A ; )IC ITE .. �. . .... i U City G-f'K PAGE D-3 03- 879- YEAR 2005 LEVEL OF SERVICE WITHOUT THE PROJECT Table 2 presents an analysis of the future year 2005 corridor level of service without the project. Roadway vehicular volumes and mass transit volumes was taken from Table 1 (2003) and adjusted to the year 2005 by applying a growth factor of 2% per year and. adding committed development traffic. As can be seen from Table 2, it is estimated that the Biscayne Boulevard Corridor will operate at Level of Service "B" in the year 2005 without the project METROPOLIS BAYSHORE CONDOMINIUM April 29, 2003 -In q Vit-thn itern ■ risci a A. City Clerk PAGE D-4 03- 879 - (CORRIDOR NAME Principal Roadway(s) BISCAYNE CORRIDOR Biscayne Boulevard (5058) MetroBus Rte MetroBus Rte MetroBus Rte MetroBus RIO: MetroBus Rte I MetroBus Rte I MetroBus Rte MetroBus Rte M7 Biscayne Boulevard Subtotal N.E_ 2nd Avenue (276) MetroBus Rte MetroBus Rte ' N.E. 2nd Avenue Subtotal Miami Avenue (308) MetroBus Rte Miami Avenue Subtotal TOTAL LOS TABLE 2005 CORR TYPE (1) LS 0.81 B TAE 0:70 B TRANSIT ROADV 0.71 C ROADWAY ROADWAY 0.80 C PER. TRIP VEHICULAR 0.81 D CAPACITY VOLUME 0.90 D @PPV= 221 0.91 E 1.4 38 1.00 E (3) (4) 1.01 F 31808 3,810 Ge OWT8I804DE0ELOPMENT TRAFFIC 1.02 Ra9'ear Biscayne Boulevard (5058) 494 3,808. 1,707 2,720 3,808 LOCAL MetroBus Fite 3 14.38% 20 MetroBus Rte 16 12.68% 17 MetroBus Rte 32 4.12% 6 MetroBus Rte 36 2.82% 4 MetroBus Rte 62 7.67% 11 MetroBus Rte 95 0.17% MetroBus Rte T 13.22% 18 MetroBbs Rte MAX 16.21% 22 MetroBus Rte 9 24.05% 33 MetroBus Rte 10 4.05% 6 MetroBus Rte 6 0.62% 1 100.00% 137 METROPOLIS CONDOMINIUM April 29, 2003 AUTO PERSON TI TRANSIT PERSOF TOTAL PERSON 1 lips I TRIPS RIPS 1,348 10,223 3'&16 TRAN SIT 692 PAX EXPRESS RAIL TOTAL 20 17 6 4 11 0 0 18 22 33 6 1 01 138 ILE 2 - 2C JAY MODE ROADWAY PER. TRIP VOLUME i @PPV= 1.4 (5) 5,334 5,334 2,390 2,390 1,150 1,150 8,874 86.81% 13.19% 105 LEVI ROADWAI EXCESS PER. TRIF CAPACIn (1,526) 1,418 1,418 2,658 2,658 2,550 SIT =L OF SE ' ROADWA) PERSON TRIP V/C (7) 1.40 1,40 0.63 0.63 0,30 0.30 0.78 :RVII LOS. F F B a A A C '#E ATL LOCAL BUS PER. TRIP CAPACITY @ LOAD = DESIGN (8) 389 392 387 400 734 0 400 519 3,221 828 205 1,033 34 34 4,289 YSIS W1 T EXPRESS PER. TRIP CAPACITY @ LOAD = DESIGN (9) 0 0 0 0 0 447 0 0 447 0 0 0 0 0 447 THOUT I 4ASS TRAN RAIL TRA(` PER. TRIP CAPACITY @ LOAD = DESIGN (10) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 'ROJEC;' SIT MODE { TOTAL TRANSIT CAPACITY @ LOAD = DESIGN (11) 389 392 387 400 734 447 400 519 3,668 828 205 1,033 34 34 4,736 T TAE TRANSIT TRANSIT ROADV ROADWAY ROADWAY ROADWAY VEHICULAR PER. TRIP VEHICULAR CAPACITY CAPACITY VOLUME 195 @PPV= 221 56 1.4 38 (2) (3) (4) 2,720 31808 3,810 2,720 3,808 3,810 2,720 3,808. 1,707 2,720 3,808 1,707 2,720 3,808 821 2,720 3,808 821 8,160 11,424 6,339 AUTO PERSON TI TRANSIT PERSOF TOTAL PERSON 1 lips I TRIPS RIPS 1,348 10,223 3'&16 TRAN SIT 692 PAX EXPRESS RAIL TOTAL 20 17 6 4 11 0 0 18 22 33 6 1 01 138 ILE 2 - 2C JAY MODE ROADWAY PER. TRIP VOLUME i @PPV= 1.4 (5) 5,334 5,334 2,390 2,390 1,150 1,150 8,874 86.81% 13.19% 105 LEVI ROADWAI EXCESS PER. TRIF CAPACIn (1,526) 1,418 1,418 2,658 2,658 2,550 SIT =L OF SE ' ROADWA) PERSON TRIP V/C (7) 1.40 1,40 0.63 0.63 0,30 0.30 0.78 :RVII LOS. F F B a A A C '#E ATL LOCAL BUS PER. TRIP CAPACITY @ LOAD = DESIGN (8) 389 392 387 400 734 0 400 519 3,221 828 205 1,033 34 34 4,289 YSIS W1 T EXPRESS PER. TRIP CAPACITY @ LOAD = DESIGN (9) 0 0 0 0 0 447 0 0 447 0 0 0 0 0 447 THOUT I 4ASS TRAN RAIL TRA(` PER. TRIP CAPACITY @ LOAD = DESIGN (10) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 'ROJEC;' SIT MODE { TOTAL TRANSIT CAPACITY @ LOAD = DESIGN (11) 389 392 387 400 734 447 400 519 3,668 828 205 1,033 34 34 4,736 T TOTAL TRANSIT TRANSIT PERSON PERSON TRIP TRIP EXCESS VOLUME CAPACITY (12) (13) 194 195 171 221 56 331 38 382 103 631 2 444 178 221 219 301 981 2,707 324 504 55 161 379 654 8 26 8 26 1,348 3,387 CORRIDOR PERSON TRIP CAPACITY (14) 3,808 389 392 387 400 734 447 400 519 7,476 3,808 828 205 4,841 3,808 34 3,843 16,160 CORRII CORRIDOR PERSON TRIP VOLUME (15) 5,334 194 171 56 38 103 2 178 219 6,296 2,390 324 55 2,769 1,150 8 1,158 10,223 S6 )OR TOTAL! CORRIDOR PERSON TRIP EXCESS CAPACITY (16) (1,526) 195 221 331 362 631 444 221 301 1,180 1,418 504 151 2,072 2,858 26 2,684 5,937 CORRIDOR PERSON TRIP V/C (17) 1.40 0.84 0.63 0.57 0.30 0.30 0.63 I F D 8 A A A 8 } s 9 P2)1-1 1�3 kA ( PAGE D-5 03- 879-- PROJECT TRAFFIC Table 3 presents project traffic and mass transit ridership based upon PM peak hour project traffic. The project site is located in Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) 505 (note that this is the new zone system). The cardinal distribution of the traffic within TAZ 505 was obtained from Miami - Dade County. The distribution is as follows: North -Northeast 9.89% East -Northeast 3.86% East -Southeast 4.71% South -Southeast 3.70% South -Southwest 20.92% West -Southwest 23.40% West -Northwest 16.84% North -Northwest 16.68% Using this trip distribution, the project trip assignment was determined. This is shown in Figure 1. sGsia .L tOrd �,.- the public litern, _moi 1 „y A-'. erk METROPOLIS BAYSHORE CONDOMINIUM PAGE D-6 April 29, 2003 03— 879 -1 CORRIDOR NAME ` Prinai pal Roadway(s) BISCAYNE CORRIDOR Biscayne Boulevard (5058) MetroBus Rte 3 MetroBus Rte 16 MelroBua Rte 32 MelroBua Rte 36 MetroBus Rte 62 MetroBus Rte 95 MetroBus Rte T MetroBus Rte MAX Biscayne Boulevard Subtotal N.E. 2nd Avenue (278) MetroBus Rte 9 MetroBus Rte 10 N.E. 2nd Avenue Subtotal Miami Avenue (308) MetroBus Rte BI Miami Avenue Subtotal TO TAL LOS TABLE 0.70 B 0.71 C 0.80 C 0.81 D 0.90 D 0.91 E 1.00 E 1.01 F 2004 CORR TYPE (1) LS ROADWAY VEHICULAF CAPACITY (2) 2,720 2,720 2,720 2,720 2,720 2,720 8,160 AUTO PERSON T TRANSIT PERSO TOTAL PERSON PROJECT TRAFFIC 2af8H 33A)6 Biscayne. Boulevard (6056) 239 TRANSIT 334.8 PERSON CAPACITY LOCAL EXPRESS MetroBus Rte 3 14.38% 2.5 DESIGN MetroBus Rte 16 12.68% 2.2 (12) MetroBus Rte 32 4.12% 0.7 386 MetroBus Rte 36 2.82% 0.5 387 MetroBus Rte 62 7.67% 1.4 0 MetroBus Rte 95 0.17% 1 733 MetroBus Rte T 13.22% 2.3 400 MetroB*a Rte MAX 16.21% 2.9 3 MetroBus Rle 9 24.05% 4.2 3,855 MetroBus Rte 10 q.05% 1 0.7 205 MetroBus Rte 6 0.62% 0.1 5 1,026 100.00%. 18 34 METROPOLIS CONDOMINIUM April 29, 2003 ROADWAY PER, TRIF CAPACITY @PPV= 1.4 (3) 3.808 3,808 3,908 3,808 3,808 3,808 11,424 RIPS N TRIPS TRIPS IPAX RAIL 10 ROAD% ROADWAY VEHICULAR VOLUME (4) 239 239 0 0 0 0 239 TITIAN SIT TOTAL 3351 1 0 1 0 2 3 4 1 VAY MODE ROADWAY PER. TRIP VOLUME @PPV= 1.4 (5) 335 335 0 0 0 0 335 1 TA ROADWAY EXCESS PER. TRIP CAPACITY (6) 3,473 3,473 3,808 3,808 3,808 3,808 11,089 TRANSIT %BLE 3 - ROADWAY PERSON TRIP V/C (7) 0.09 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 PRC LOS A A A A A A A IJECT TF LOCAL BU: PER. TRIP CAPACITY @ LOAD = DESIGN (8) 389 392 387 400 734 0 400 519 3,221 828 205 I 1,033 34 34 4,289 ;AFFIC EXPRESS PER. TRIF CAPACITY @ LOAD = DESIGN (9) 0 0 0 0 0 447 0 0 447 0 0 0 0 0 447 AASS TRAN RAIL TRAI` PER. TRIP CAPACITY @ LOAD = DESIGN (10) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SIT MODE TOTAL TOTAL TRANSIT TRANSIT TRANSIT PERSON CAPACITY PERSON TRIP @ LOAD = TRIP EXCESS DESIGN VOLUME CAPACITY (11) (12) (13) 389 3 386 392 2 390 387 1 386 400 0 400 734 1 733 447 0 447 400 2 397 519 3 517 3,668 13 3,855 828 4 824 205 1 204 1,033 5 1,026 34 0 34 34 0 341 4,736 18 4,718 PERSON TRIP CAPACITY (14) 3,808 389 392 387 400 734 447 400 519 7,476 3,808 826 205 4,841 3,808 34 3,843 16,160 CORRII R CORRIDOR PERSON TRIP VOLUME (15) 335 3 2 1 0 1 0 2 3 347 0 4 1 5 0 0 0 352 )OR TOTALS CORRIDOR PERSON TRIP EXCESS CAPACITY (16) 3,473 386 390 386 400 733 447 397 517 7,129 3,808 824 204 4,836 3,808 34 3,842 15,808 PERSON TRIP V/C (17) 0.09 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 1793 W 62155 NE 20TH STREET I 17?3 81 172 - FF NE 19TH STREET21,196 NE 18THISTREET 49199 AMIPM PEAK HOU R PROJECT TRAFFIC IN VPH METROPOLIS BAYSHORE CONDOMINIUM April 29, 2003 PROJECT FIGURE D-1 PROJECT TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT PAGE D-8 ubf ttr b q+� 03- 879 E 17TH fERR 4944 14159 91lom 3111 W {> o ` J Q m Z Z CV d = m Q 0] 03 Z 49199 AMIPM PEAK HOU R PROJECT TRAFFIC IN VPH METROPOLIS BAYSHORE CONDOMINIUM April 29, 2003 PROJECT FIGURE D-1 PROJECT TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT PAGE D-8 ubf ttr b q+� 03- 879 Project transit ridership was estimated based upon the assumption that 5% of project person trips would be by mass transit. Assignment of person trips was proportioned to the MetroBus routes . YEAR 2005 LEVEL OF SERVICE WITH THE PROJECT Table 4 presents an analysis of the future year 2005 corridor level of service with the project. Roadway vehicular volumes and mass transit volumes were determined by adding the data from Table 2 (Year 2005 Without Project) and Table 3 (Project Traffic). As can be seen from Table 4, it is estimated that the Biscayne Boulevard Corridor will operate at Level of Service "B" in the year 2005 with the project. METROPOLIS BAYSHORE CONDOMINIUMPAGE D-9 April 29, 2003 1Zci;s �( -t :a ;o 9 9 'CORRIDOR NAME Principal Roadway(s) BISCAYNE CORRIDOR Biscayne Boulevard (5058) MetroBus Rte MetroBus Rte 1 MetroBus Rte MetroBus Rte 3 MetroBus Rte E MetroBus Rte 5 MetroBus Rte MetroBus Rte MA Biscayne Boulevard Subtotal N.E_ 2nd Avenue (276) MetroBus Rte MetroBus Rte 1 N.E. 2nd Avenue Subtotal Miami Avenue (308) MetroBus Rte Miami Avenue Subtotal TOTAL LOS TABLE 0.60 A 0.81 B 0.70 B 0.71 C 0.80 C 0.81 D 0.90 D 0.91 E 1.00 E 1.01 F TABLE 4 - 2005 LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS WITH PROJECT LS 2,720 3,808 2,720 .3,808 ROADWAY MODE 3,808 2,720 3,808 2,720 MASS TRANSIT MODE 2004 ROADWAY ROADWAY ROADWAY ROADWAY ROADWAY ROADWAY LOCAL BUS EXPRESS RAIL TRAN TOTAL CORR VEHICULAR PER. TRIP VEHICULAR PER. TRIP EXCESS PERSON PER. TRIP PER. TRIPPER. TRIP TRANSIT TYPE CAPACITY CAPACITY VOLUME VOLUME PER. TRIP TRIP CAPACITY CAPACI CAPACITY CAPACITI @PPV= @PPV= CAPACITY V/C LOS @,LOAD = @ LOAD = @ LOAD = @ LOAD = 1.4 1.4 DESIGN DESIGN DESIGN DESIGN (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) 0 1) LS 2,720 3,808 2,720 .3,808 2,720 3,808 2,720 3,808 2,720 3,808 2,720 3,808 8,160 11,424 AUTO PERSON TRIPS TRANSIT PERSON TRIPS TOTAL PERSON TRIPS 4,049 5,669 (1.881) 4.049 TRANSIT 5,669 (1,861) 1,707 TRIP 2,390 1,418 1,707 CAPACITY 2,390 1.418 821 1,150 2,658 821 1,150 2,658 6,578 9,209 2,215 9,209 87.08% 1,368 -12.92% 10.575 100.00% 1.49 I F 1.49 F 0.63 B 0.63 B 0.30 A 0.30 A 0.81 C 389 392 387 400 734 0 400 519 3,221 828 205 1.033 34 34 4,289 0 0 0 0 0 447 0 0 447 0 0 0 0 0 447 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 389 392 387 400 734 447 400 519 3,668 828 205 1,033 34 34 4,736 TOTAL TRANSIT 'RANSIT PERSON IERSON TRIP TRIP EXCESS FOLUME CAPACITY (12) (13) 196 173 58 38 105 2 181 221 974 329 55 384 19? 219 331. 367 624 444. 219. 298' 2,694 499 150 649 26 26 3,370 CORRIDOR TOTALS CORRIDOR CORRIDOR PERSON PERSON TRIP TRIP CAPACITY VOLUME (14) 3,808 389 392 387 400 734 447 400 519 7,476 3,808 828 205 4,841 3,808 34 3,843 16,160 (15) 5,669 196 173 56 38 105 2 181 221 6,643 2,390 329 55 2,774 1,150 8 1,158 10,575 CORRIDOR CORRIDOR PERSON PERSON TRIP TRIP EXCESS V/C CAPACITY .(16) (17) (1,861) 192 219 331 362 629 444 219 298 833 1,418 499 150 2,067 2,658 26 2,684 5,585 1.49 0.51 0.44 0.15 0.10 0.14 0.01 0.45 0.43 0.89 0.83 0.40 0.27 0.57 0.30 0.24 0.30 0.65 F A A A A A A A A D B A A A A A A B o oil, vaou i, o 0mDomvomms Since 1989 CIVIL LAND DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION METROPOLIS BAYSHORE PROPOSED CONDOMINIUM TOWER 1852-1900 North Bayshore Drive SITE UTILITY STUDY March 2003 CiLy Clerk 8550 W. FLTEL:E 05) 5 1-6267 • FAX:T, SUITE (3 5) MIAMI,5.4542 FLORIDA 33144 0 3 — (� 7 9 F -mail• vcnnvcnann rnm J a7 0 / a7 EX, MGM UM801 Since 1989 CML AND DEVELOPLENT TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1. General ........................................................................... 1 2. Storm Drainage System ...................................................... 2 3. Water Distribution System ................................................... 4 4. Sewer Collection System .................................................... 5 5. Solid Waste Generation ..................................................... 7 EXHIBITS: "At' Location Map .......................................................... 9 "B" Storm Drainage Well Calculations .............................. 10 (ICY) MD-WASD Water Atlas ....... .............. ...................... 14 MD-WASD Sewer Atlas ............................................ 15 Proposed Water Use Calculations .............................. 16 DERM Pump Station 30-0002 Monthly Report ............. 17 MD-WASD Letter of Availability ................................ 18 "Dlt Solid Waste Generation Calculations ........................... 21 P G Ciark o)3— 879 1. General ommul �U 11 B .E Since 1989 CIVIL LAND DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION METROPOLIS BAYSHORE SITE UTILITY STUDY A. Project Location and size: The proposed project consists of a Residential Condominium Tower to be constructed at an approximately 1.51 acre (net) site located at 1852-1900 North Bayshore Drive, Miami, Fl. (See Exhibit "A"). The project is bounded to the east by North Bayshore Drive and to the west by NE 4t" Avenue. All being in Section 31, Township 53 South, Range 42 East, Miami -Dade County, Florida. The site is presently occupied by a 10 story residential building. This building will be demolished to allow for the construction of the project. B. Proposed project build out: The proposed project consists of two Phases. Phase One will be a 51 story tower with 447 residential units. Phase Two will be a 43 story tower with 306 residential Units. A total of 753 residential condominium units will be constructed. In addition, there will be a total of 10,490 sf of restaurant/retail/office space. Into the pu Iic a ith a .r s P3rni sn City Clerk 03- 879 UMMUMOUGUM U MOMME 0 Since 1989 2. Storm Drainage System A. Existing Storm Drainage System: CML LAND DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION Roadway storm drainage systems presently exist along the streets surrounding the proposed project. These systems are owned and maintained by the City of Miami. The site, in its existing or proposed conditions, does not or will not contribute any significant amount of storm water run-off into the Public Roadway System. No significant improvements to the existing Roadway Drainage System are expected as a result of this project other than some possible inlet modifications associated with the street of sidewalk improvements. B. Proposed On -Site Storm Drainage System: The proposed storm drainage system to serve this project will be designed to fully contain on-site the storm water run-off and to meet the Miami - Dade County Department of Environmental Resources Management (DERM). This will be accomplished by means of deep drainage wells. No off- site run-off will be generated from the site. The total contributing site area and 30% of the building wall area exposed to the rain will be included in the Disposal Well System design calculations. An impervious coefficient of 0.95 will be used for the purpose of this study. Based on information provided by an experienced well drilling company for other projects in the vicinity, an approximate well discharge rate 700 gpm per foot of head can be expected. Storm water from roofs, internal driveways, walkways and parking areas will be conveyed by means of a collection system to sediment tanks sized to meet the detention volume requirements prior to discharging into the Well System. Additional Water Quality pre-treatment and Pollution Retardant Baffles at the catch basins will be provided at areas subject to vehicle traffic. /..� ye.lj Rey a YL� �)3-- 8792 a n uH OW0 Since 1989 C. Required number of Wells: Cmc LAND DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION The proposed wells will be designed to retain on-site the 5 -year frequency storm event as required by DERM and the City of Miami. Based on the attached calculations, a total of 3 storm drainage wells are required to provide full on-site retention for this project depending on the actual yields obtained during the well drilling operations. For Well Disposal System calculations refer to attached Exhibit "B". 0'ULx4�; LA Q2 C le rk 3 3- 879 Since 1989 3. Water Distribution System A. Existing Water System Facilities: CIVIL LAND DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION Miami -Dade Water & Sewer Department (MD-WASD) owns and operates the following domestic water facilities in the vicinity of this project: • An Existing 16 -inch water main on North Bayshore Drive that runs along the entire east side of the property. • An existing 8 -inch water main on NE 19th Street that runs along portions of the east side of the property. • An existing 16 -inch water main on Biscayne Blvd. B. Required Water System Improvements: Miami -Dade Water and Sewer Department (MD-WASD) has requested on the letter of availability dated November 14, 2002 (See exhibit "C") that a new water main be constructed from the existing 16" water main on Biscayne Blvd and interconnecting with the existing 16" water main on North Bayshore Drive. Fire, Domestic and Irrigation Service to the project will be provided from this new 16" water main. C. Anticipated water use: The water use requirements for this project are calculated based on the build -out information previously described. An additional flow demand of 142,073 GPD is expected from this project. For determination of anticipated flows see Exhibit "C". r, Public k Uri 'PJ UMM U ©..MamnumusI �1..R Since 1989 3. Water Distribution System A. Existing Water System Facilities: CIVIL LAND DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION Miami -Dade Water & Sewer Department (MD-WASD) owns and operates the following domestic water facilities in the vicinity of this project: • An Existing 16 -inch water main on North Bayshore Drive that runs along the entire east side of the property. • An existing 8 -inch water main on NE 19th Street that runs along portions of the east side of the property. • An existing 16 -inch water main on Biscayne Blvd. B. Required Water System Improvements: Miami -Dade Water and Sewer Department (MD-WASD) has requested on the letter of availability dated November 14, 2002 (See exhibit "C") that a new water main be constructed from the existing 16" water main on Biscayne Blvd and interconnecting with the existing 16" water main on North Bayshore Drive. Fire, Domestic and Irrigation Service to the project will be provided from this new 16" water main. C. Anticipated water use: The water use requirements for this project are calculated based on the build -out information previously described. An additional flow demand of 142,073 GPD is expected from this project. For determination of anticipated flows see Exhibit "C". r, Public k Uri 'PJ Since 1989 4. Sewer Collection System CML LAND DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTAT)ON A. Existing Sanitary Sewer System Facilities: Miami -Dade Water & Sewer Department (MD-WASD) owns and operates the following sanitary sewer facilities in the vicinity of this project: • An existing 8 -inch gravity sewer line along NE 19th Street that runs along the entire front of this property. • An existing 6 -inch gravity sewer line along the alley to the west of the property. • An existing 72" Sanitary Sewer Interceptor along North Bayshore Drive. B. Required Sanitary Sewer System Improvements: MD-WASD Gravity Sewer System requirements: It appears that the existing Sanitary Sewer Collection System is adequate and additional offsite system improvements will not be necessary for the construction of this project. MD-WASD on the letter of availability (see exhibit "C") has established that the point of connection for the Sanitary Sewer will be the existing 8 - inch gravity line on NE 19th Street. 4R S f B 9_3 City Cierk ,)3- 879 5 Since 1989 CML LAND DEVELOPWW TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION C. Transmission Capacity Requirements The Wastewater generated by this project will be conveyed to MD-WASD Pump Station No. 30-0002. This station has a yearly NAPOT of 2.99 hours per day according to DERM. (See Exhibit "C") The above referenced pump station has sufficient available capacity to support this project. Flows form this Pump Station is transmitted to the MD-WASD Treatment Plant at Virginia Key. public PZ - ?. b City Clerk 0 93- 879 LU_ 11 M..M■...i Since 1989 CML LAND DEVELOPWW TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION C. Transmission Capacity Requirements The Wastewater generated by this project will be conveyed to MD-WASD Pump Station No. 30-0002. This station has a yearly NAPOT of 2.99 hours per day according to DERM. (See Exhibit "C") The above referenced pump station has sufficient available capacity to support this project. Flows form this Pump Station is transmitted to the MD-WASD Treatment Plant at Virginia Key. public PZ - ?. b City Clerk 0 93- 879 MINE UU 1 120 UMB.M.... Since 1989 5. Solid Waste Generation CIVIL LAND DEVELOPKEW TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION A. Solid Waste Generated by this project will be collected in standardized on- site containers for refuse and re-cyclables. Either hauling companies and/or the City of Miami Solid Waste Department will provide regular pick- up services. The anticipated daily solid waste generation for this project is 26.68 CY per day. (See Appendix "D"). Bub g ; .., a . rel Iblic reco: I ith iter pp 7y City Clerk 7 03- 879 o a-n om vaso , o ummmummmon Since 1989 crnL LAND DEVELOPWW TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION EXHIBIT "A" Location Map 03- 879 1-Q 2 e3■r IDd $, — _ zl ISA 9 MA N.C. zD s, ST. OA 'ARK NO 2 IBA IB 16 N w 1, 4 z • s .o so •0T 3 fD1% 7• �I• 4 IDS •0 127 3 Z E S V~] ,� ,s a•c 4 3 2 4 2 1 i9 si 5 w :4 1 (, �• 6' 77 Du Li PROJECT ,� >l 71 , a to : �Q = sem' 4 R LOCATION ts+ Q - b irnl ]s ;s F-1, ago d fo -.n • 11 17c :u S] - �, a a s Z _ 3 o BISCAYNE o„ a z I = 32�e .K 7 °Ix FEDERAL L PLAZA S O 6 to a Q y> O 1 m 11 -7 AMENDED I > 9 -3� j' `los 1O a (109-77) + w oe i �o sui ,6 _14 S Z TRACT•AII 0I 12 o r ` £ 17 ERR. ?} . 3ti i • iz I Ico O lJIIRNIecl » -• is 1D S i 1 21, PLAZA" C > IC ss •- -.S s s s, N. E. [6 CBD OM N I 1 LATER gT101.1AL 102 -3 J 2 Ie 7 :s Is 14 I) Lid _ M T(ZAGT 9 z 17 16 IS 14NJ 13 4 Il 10 9 H_ �s le I� :o to 2s c o- .moo Sa._L PLAZA I VENETIA + PHASE I �.+..I 4 TRRAT? (�J r1 —t R„-, p4.b ics H. — �. II1T. ... 1 TLZACT t f A. I 1 I 1 '* .. y 4• bo . I � _ a I � 1 I i A 1I F ur4,1 +an i+1 1 is.i.�_ 1 1 In.l _ / I( ..� I I I T'I j iE:r f Z i 6 YSLNA T AV �I y Cre r .• A c i• _ � L� 1 J�� r j j j �`1l 1 I � d T4 - J� '• 1 � 1 tf • y`� _' � ■ t l 1 1 II f ft 1ti [�11 �+�II If • ..1 1 1 1 1\ !1 1�'1 . � VJ ii7i1 Irv. 1 ■ 1 �:.__ G'. L■' J . PAQCEL_ ",d” � '' 1 1 L i Yf� I r 3 i `�' � 1 1■ <. I. ,: l:■, 1 � w (&1 -ZI CSI 1 ! I il-{ I i5�5 I --. �i i i CL t I #� ! �� , ri w1 IN las y! e 1 i UJI : v': t ._ Q I I I 1j1 1 t I{ I 1 N,E, 14(/ yam) (4+-14 / -1 `'� 1 q N t QJ ta, i _ i 033- Q �J 4 f 2 W F� E8- Q Q C\I + I V I V ]51' 0 so •i Ifj '4 Eb� EB° -i e �Il C� I Il���l III Since 1989 CML LAND DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION EXHIBIT "B" Storm Drainage Calculations St Ib s7— re Ite Lag a R Ly Clerk 03- 875 10 �7/ CIVIL 6 LANA DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION �� (\ Since 1989 PROJECT NAME DRAINAGE AREA: SITE DATA: METROPOLIS BAYSHORE 3/17/2003 ENTIRE SITE Page 1 SITE AREA = 1.51 ACRES BUILDING FOOT PRINT = 350 FT BUILDING HIGHT = 435 FT BUILDING WALL AREA = 3.50 ACRES CONTRIBUTING BUILDING AREA = 1.05 ACRES CONTRIBUTING AREA = 2.56 ACRES NUMBER OF WELLS = 3 CF REQUIRED VOLUME FOR 90 SEC. DETENTION TIME: CONTRIBUTING AREA PER WELL = 2.56 ACRES RAINFALL INTENSITY (90 SEC) = 6.4 IN/HR RUN OFF VOLUME (90 SEC) = 1,326 CF DETENTION VOLUME PROVIDED: TANK LENGTH = 15.00 FT TANK WIDTH = 7.50 FT TANK BOTTOM ELEV = -2.50 NGVD TOP OF WELL CASING ELEV = 2.50 NGVD STORAGE DEPTH = 5.00 FT DETENTION VOL PROVIDED = (per well) 562.50 CF TOTAL DETENTION VOLUME = 1,688 CF S �a.7"tl W��a.✓^IE.tid �C 133- 879 11 Ey PROJECT NAME DRAINAGE AREA: 0n cIQ��O09U�1Hemoom C FACTOR 0.8 ADJ. INFL. CF DRAINAGE AREA = 2.56 ACRES NEON 3 DRAINAGE WELL DATA: Since 1989 CIVIL LAND DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION METROPOLIS BAYSHORE 3/17/2003 ENTIRE SITE Page 2 WELL DIAMETER = 24 INCHES WELL DISCHARGE RATE PER FT OF HEAD = 700 GPM AVAILABLE HEAD = 3.00 FT DISCHARGE RATE PER WELL = 2,100 GPM CUMULATIVE INFLOW/OUTFLOW DATA: STORM FREQUENCY= 5YEARS C FACTOR 0.8 ADJ. INFL. CF DRAINAGE AREA = 2.56 ACRES # OF WELLS PROVIDED 3 1688 TOTAL DISCHARGE RATE = 6,300 GPM TOTAL DISCHARGE RATE = 14.04 CFS SEDIMENT TANK STORAGE = 1,688 CF F.D. STORAGE = 0 CF SOLID PIPE STORAGE = 0 CF INFLOW-EXFILTRATION TABLE TIME MIN INTEN. IN/HR CUM.INFLOW CF SYST. STO. CF ADJ. INFL. CF WELL DISCH. CF OVERFLOW CFS 8 6.41 6295 1688 4607 6738 -4.44 10 6.17 7576 1688 5888 8422 -4.22 15 5.64 10397 1688 8710 12634 -4.36 20 5.20 12776 1688 11089 16845 -4.80 30 4.50 16568 1688 14880 25267 -5.77 40 3.96 19454 1688 17766 33690 -6.63 60 3.20 23558 1688 21871 50535 -7.96 90 2.48 27414 1688 25726 75802 -9.27 120 2.03 29857 1688 28169 101070 -10.13 150 1.71 31544 1688 29856 126337 -10.72 180 1.48 32778 1688 31091 151604 -11.16 record a �... �3 3 8 "�.9�'��� Jul 12 U 8■.M■... • MD-WASD Water Atlas • MD-WASD Sewer Atlas CIVIL LAND DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION EXHIBIT "C" Proposed Water Use Calculations • Miami -Dade Water and Sewer Department Letter of Availability • DERM Pump Station 30-0002 Monthly Information rc._¢ items 2 -1- 03- City Clerk 87913 HI I 1I -Ili -VL Y.F.304WD 428) 2001 N.E. ! App. IZ-11 N DW- 104 5 5.1 20 2 h J9 TERR. UW98Q61 r 8203 moj*6cr Y. F. - 1224 14 i 834 N.E. ! s l9 188 7870 ST LOCA770AI e 3584 tai 348 ca T�81 ! 9047 > : ' 9 219 . W, w > 2" pp 2��� 18023 (� 7870 u p "(02-16 � R.A.9/13/0 z 7584J' 1 7584 3'S84 540 91 �i 0T8T0 N.E. 17 . 025 Z y TERR N. E. 17 TER. 744 6 I '� 3584 �. 40 •• �,, m N, E. 54S 167 3420 D 12 9219 -j 14 1 ..+ 17 S T. N.E. 17 ST. w . 8734 430 ek" w 12" 8143 L y 7578 8219 33x6 : 1. , ,187 342 r f � N.E. 16 �// k.• .X�` j"v`. . 128 8317 5+16 • : w cc 9048 . OD 2 , E. 15 TER � 6' p 11 1�12b. 187 222 222 'VE�ITURI ry 11219 1 ME'CER $46 N. E. 15 Y E N E T 1 A _-. _..-- �amoimumnumn NUMBER RATE ADF [Units] [gpd/unit] , ums 0=0001 PHASE ONE Since 1989 CIVIL LAND DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION PROPOSED WATER USE CALCULATIONS PROJECT METROPOLIS BAYSHORE DATE: 24 -Mar -03 TYPE OF BUILDING USE NUMBER RATE ADF [Units] [gpd/unit] [gpd] PROPOSED FLOWS: PHASE ONE Condominium Units 447 200 89,400 Restaurant (seats) 300 50 15,000 PHASE TWO Condominium Units 306 200 61,200 Office 2,496 0.10 250 Retail 1,477 0.05 74 SUB -TOTAL 165,923 PREVIOUS FLOWS: EXISITING BUILDING Apartemnt Units 108 200 21,600 Efficiencies 9 250 2,250 SUB -TOTAL 23,850 NET INCREASE: 142,073 pp 99gy (( R on City Clerk 03- 87916 Pump station Monthly Information Station..30 0002 Atlas Pg..E13 XIAMT DADE WATER & SEWER DEPARTMENT Addr..925 BISCAY= BLVD Sec -Township -Range....... ....31-53-42 Genr. ET clock.Y Telm.Y #Pumps. 5 Pump Type.A stn C1a9s.M speed.R Hrspwr,+ Res flow(gpd) Proj Napot % Cap Plans.. 1,209,789 3.83 hrs 38.40 Plats., 0 2.99 hrs 29.90 Extens. 0 2.99 hrs 29.90 <Plan Review> Moratorium..OR Moratorium effective since ! / Yearly NAPOT (hrs)............ 2.99 Stn Gross Capacity(gpd).. 57,600,000 Station Reduction Factor....... 0.60 Stn Net Cap Certif(gpd).. 0 Stn Net Capacity(gpd).... 34,560,000 Indicated Flows(gpd)..... 4,305,600 Date Mo.NAPOT Avg Daily Flows Rgd # Comments F l g P*np 01/27/2003 2.80 11.21 0.00 Y 5 12/23/2002 3.03 12.13 0.00 Y 5 11/21/2002 2.99 11.94 0.00 Y 5 10/23/2002 3.18 12.70 0.00 Y 5 0.9/24/2002 3.24 12.95 0.00 Y 5 08/23/2002 3.16 12.63 0.00 Y S 07/25/2002 4.34 17.34 0.00 Y 5 Sigiiature..R04UER Sign Date..01/25/1999 15:32:02.76 GOLD/M Station 7<m>provement GOLD/S <S>tation inform. GOLD/U <U>pstream Station GOLD/D <D>owanstream Station GOLD/P <P>ump Information GOLD/G Codes & Cata<g>ories GOLD/T Sewer Cer<t>ification r- City Gierk �3- 879 17 Mar 05 03 03:42p h l *U, nh1AMl Dr,DE U'�ATLR AND SEWER DEPARTMEN 1 <,-, RVE . (0�:S11"/L November 14, 2002 Tim Foreman 1526 Ponce de Leon Blvd. Coral Gables, Florida 33134 Re: Water and Sewer Availability for proposed project located at 1852 and 1900 North Bayshore Drive, Miami -Dade County, Florida. Dear Mr. Foreman: This letter is in response to your inquiry regarding water and sewer availability to the above -referenced project for the proposed construction of seven hundred (700) condominium units. The County owns and operates a sixteen (16) inch water main located in N.E_ 19 Street and Biscayne Boulevard, from which the property owner shall install and connect a sixteen (16) inch water main easterly in N.E. 19 Street and interconnect to the existing sixteen (16) inch in N. Bayshore Drive_ Any proposed water main extensions within the referenced property shall be twelve inches (12) minimum in diameter with two (2) points of connection. The County also owns and operates an eight (8) inch gravity sewer main located in N.E. 19 Street, abutting the northern boundary of the referenced property, from which the property owner shall connect said property, provided that there is sufficient depth and that there are no obstacles which would preclude construction of the sewer. Any proposed gravity sewer main extensions within the referenced property shall be eight (8) inches minimum. Other points of connection may be established subject to approval of the Department. Construction connection charges and connection charges shall be determined once the property owner enters into an agreement for water and sewer service with the Department. Information concerning the estimated cost of facilities must be obtained from a consulting engineer. All costs of engineering and construction will be the responsibility of the property owner. In addition, the Department's standard water connection charge will be required. Easements must be provided covering any on-site facilities, which will be owned and operated by the Department. p.7 Please be advised that the right to connect the referenced property to the Department's sewer system is subject to the terms, covenants arid curru,burrs set forth in the Florida Department of Environmental Protection ("DEP") and yc,n :_ r cyDT7 9 18 Mar 05 03 03:42p the County dated July 27"', 1993, the First Amendment to Settlement Agreement between DEP and the County dated December 2151, 1995, the First Partial Consent Decree and the Second and Final Partial Consent Decree entered in the United State of American Environmental Protection Agency vs. Metropolitan Dade County (Case Number 93-1109 CIV- MORENO), as currently in effect or as modified in the future, and all other current, subsequent or future agreements, court orders, judgments, consent orders, consent decrees and the like entered into between the County and the United States. State of Florida or future enforcement and regulatory actions and proceedings. This letter is for informational purposes only and conditions remain in effect for thirty- (30) days from the date of this letter. Nothing contained in this letter provides the property owner with any vested rights to receive water service. The availability of water service is subject to the approval of all applicable governmental agencies having jurisdiction over these matters. When development plans for the subject property are finalized, and upon the owner's request, we will be pleased to prepare an agreement for water service, provided the Department is able to offer those services at the time of the owner's request. The agreement will detail requirements for off-site and on-site facilities, if any, point of connections, connection charges, capacity reservation and all other terms and conditions necessary for service in accordance with the Department's rules and regulations. If we can be of further assistance in this matter, please contact us. Very truly yours, Sandy de Armas New Business Representative Utilities Development Division p.8 Glia i e r k 19 03- 879 CIVIL s� B 09 LAND DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION Since 1989 EXHIBIT "D" Solid Waste Generation Calculations Submtted Into t q publld city Clerk 03- 879 211 IL n �� � r�r rC n U n 0000 PHASE ONE n U I1 B..M. 447 8 3,576 1.79 .I Sh7ce 1989 CIVIL LAND DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION PROPOSED SOLID WASTE CALCULATIONS PROJECT METROPOLIS BAYSHORE DATE: 31 -Mar -03 TYPE OF BUILDING USE AREA/UNITS [sq [seats] RATE [Ib/sfJ [Ib/seat] SOLID WASTE GENERATED [lb] SOLID WASTE GENERATED [tons] PHASE ONE Condominium Units 447 8 3,576 1.79 Restaurant 300 5 1,500 0.75 PHASE TWO Condominium Units 306 8 2,448 1.22 Office 2,496 0.025 62 0.03 Retail 1,477 0.025 37 0.02 NET INCREASE: 7,623 3.81 ANTICIPATED SOLID WASTE VOLUME AT 7 CY PER TON 26.68 CY / DAY Gily 8 7 9 METROPOLIS AT THE BAY Economic Impact Analysis Submitted to: City of Miami Prepared For: TERRA DEVELOPERS Prepared by: SHARPTON, BRUNSON & COMPANY, P.A. One Southeast Third Avenue Suite 2100 Miami, Florida 33131 (305) 374-1574 npt Vic P2 -1 city Clerk 03- 879 METROPOLIS AT THE BAY TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE(S) THE PROJECT OVERVIEW EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction Summary of Benefits OBJECTIVES AND DEFINITIONS Objectives Definition of Economic and Tax Impact Direct and Indirect Effects Measures of Economic Impact Description of Results DISCUSSION OF THE RESULTS BY ECONOMIC INDICATORS Impact Indicators Results of Indicators Impact of Construction Impact of Ongoing Operations Impact on Local Tax Revenues Analysis by Economic Indicators Employment Wages Output Local Taxes Public Sector Cost Impact Fees EXHIBITS Exhibit I: Summary of Economic impact Exhibit II: Impact and Other Fees 1 2 3 8 8 8 9 9 9 9 10 10 11 12 12 13 Clerk 03- 879 Project Overview Metropolis at the Bay will be two interconnected residential towers of 43 and 51 stories with a total of 752 units (the "Project"). The Project will be constructed in two phases consisting of 447 units in Phase I and 305 units in Phase II. The Project is located at 1852-1900 North Bayshore Drive, in the city of Miami, Florida. The Project also consists of 8,468 square feet of restaurantloffice space and 848 parking spaces. The net lot area is 65,595 square feet (1.51 acres). The subject property is directly opposite the newly refurbished Margaret Pace Park located on Biscayne Bay. The 2.6 -acre recreational park contains amenities such as soccer fields, a cricket field, a basketball court, tennis courts, a picnic pavilion, a view walkway promenade and a children's playground area. The majority of the tower units will have views of Biscayne Bay, the downtown Miami skyline and surrounding areas to the northwest of Downtown Miami. The development will host a variety of amenities including a gym with steam room, outdoor swimming pool, meditation outdoor garden, approximately 63,890 square feet of recreational space and pool plaza area. The positioning of the units within the towers affords them panoramic views of the City, Biscayne Bay and surrounding area. The site is an urban setting in the heart of the north Downtown Miami area with proximity to all areas of the county via major expressways and traffic arteries to the north, south and west. The property may be accessed by 1-95, 1-395 and Biscayne Boulevard (US -1) from all directions. The property has an excellent location within the urban fabric of Miami and is located only 10 minutes from downtown Miami, 15 minutes from Miami International Airport and 10 minutes from Miami Beach. In addition, the property is in close proximity to new area developments such as the new Center for Performing Arts, Parrot Jungle Island, Miami Children's Museum, American Airlines Arena and the Island Gardens. There is a definite demand for quality residential product in this part of Miami as evidenced by the market response to the proposed developments in the area such as the One Miami project, by Related Companies. The total Construction period for both phases is 42 months. The buildings are projected to be of the highest quality, with modern architectural features and are expected to set the standard for new high-rise development in the area. The buildings will have high tech features, including high speed internet access capabilities, making the buildings "smart" buildings. The architect for the development is John Nichols based in Coral Gables. Mr. Nichols has designed numerous successful projects including Ritz Carlton. The Diplomat, JW Marriott on Brickell Avenue, and the Barclays Office Plaza off of Brickell. He has extensive condominium design experience and has designed for numerous well known developers. Vitl APC. J: ;- 879 Introduction This document represents an in-depth This analysis encompasses the economic and tax benefits analysis of entire Project and estimates the the development and operation of a economic and tax benefits for first class residential building. both its developmental and operational phases. The Project currently contemplated is comprised of the following components: ❑ 752 units of high-quality residential. ❑ 8,468 square feet of restaurant/office ❑ 848 parking spaces. 6 03- 879 Summary of Benefits The Project will bring significant economic benefits to the city of Miami (the City). This section summarizes the impact of the project on employment, public sector revenues and other economic benefits as a result of the development. Employment Employment considerations include the direct employment resulting from the Project. Average developmental construction phase employment will be for approximately 145 employees and the Project management is expected to employ 20 people for on-going maintenance and operations of the facilities. Wages To compute the wages associated with the new employment we started with budgeted data directly related to the developmental and operational phases of the Project, and we incorporated data from our research on retail sales. Total direct and indirect impacts expected from wages associated with the new development approximate the following: One Time $37,959,840 Annual $ 2,255,040 Tax Revenue The estimate of the public sector revenues associated with the development includes taxes and other revenues generated directly by the Project. Although public sector costs are important elements in measuring fiscal impact, these benefits have not been quantified in this document. This analysis only measures the benefits derived from the development. Annual tax revenue expected to be created totals $4,582,839. Output The estimate of total economic impact is measured by total output. This analysis measures the economic impact of developmental costs and ongoing, operational expenditures. To determine the effect of respending within the City, we utilized a multiplier to compute total direct and indirect benefits. Total output, expected to be generated, as a result of the developmental and operational phases of the Project will approximate the following: One Time $ 290,572,723 Annual $ 5,261,760 Summary of Benefits Significant Community Benefits: ➢ Jobs ➢ Wages ➢ Taxes ➢ Economic Activity Residents' and Retail/Restaurant Employees' Spending Impacting Local Businesses: ➢ Food ➢ Recreation/Entertainment ➢ Transportation ➢ Retail The following table and charts summarize the economic impact of the Metropolis at the Bay development. Economic Activity Stimulated Output Wages Taxes Jobs Created CONSTRUCTION PERIOD ANNUAL IMPACT RECURRING $290,572,723 $ 5,261,760 37,959,840 2,255,040 4,582,839 $328,532,563 $ 12,099,639 145 20 s.it Clerk 4 03_ 879 Objectives And Definitions Objectives The objective of this analysis is to provide information on the various benefits created by the Project and to prepare an estimate of such benefits to the City. Our analysis is based on an economic model, which estimates economic and tax impacts of various projects on a designated area. The model is specifically tailored to the City of Miami (the City). Definition of Economic and Tax Impact The construction and subsequent operation of the Project will create important benefits within the City. These benefits include new income, new jobs, new tax revenue and new economic activity impacting upon every sector of the local economy. Moreover, through the multiplier effect of respending and reinvesting, indirect economic benefits are added to the direct benefits brought about by initial construction expenditures, the expenditures from ongoing operations and new spending at the retail enterprises. Direct and Indirect Effects The total economic impact of public and private projects and policies on a region does not end with the impact from the initial construction expenditures; the continued benefits to the local economy must also be considered. Income to firms furnishing construction materials and services is subsequently converted into employee salaries, material purchases, investment in plant and equipment, savings, profits, purchases of services, and a variety of other economic activities. Income to laborers is subsequently r? f9^% !rfo ?' mAblac respent for purchasing of food, housing, transportation, education, entertainment, medical and dental services, clothing, personal services, and a wide variety of other goods and services. Furthermore, income to the governmental unit is respent as salaries, purchases, and support of a variety of programs, including education, transportation, and social services. In turn, individuals, firms, and governments furnishing these goods and services again spend their income for more purchases, salaries, investments, and savings. In this manner, indirect benefits result each time the initial sum is respent, and the additional sum available in the local economy induces further job creation, business development and savings. Quantification of these indirect benefits has been the object of considerable economic study. Because economic relationships are so complex in our modern society, no single area or political unit is a completely self-contained economic unit. Therefore, purchases from other areas and political units are necessary, and goods services are exported in return. As purchases are made from other units, some of the benefits of economic respending are lost to the local economy. Ultimately, a smaller and smaller portion of the initial sum would remain, until, after several rounds of respending, an insignificant sum is left. 5 03- 879 Objectives And Definitions The indirect effects can be viewed as a set of "ripples" in the economy. Indirect, like direct, resources require labor, materials, equipment and services for their production to induce further job creation and spending of wages. The "ripple" of the indirect effect multiplies the original impact of the purchase. The common measure of the magnitude of the "ripple" effect is called a multiplier. A multiplier measures the total magnitude of the impact on each particular economic indicator as a multiple of the initial, direct effect. For instance, a multiplier of "1" would signify no "ripple" effects as the total impact is 1 times the initial impact, while a multiplier of "2" would imply that the total impact is 2 times the direct effect. The actual magnitude of a multiplier depends on the likelihood the goods and services purchased in a region would be produced in, or provided from the region. The model we used to estimate the total economic impact incorporates a multiplier developed by utilizing past consumption and production patterns in the City. There will be significant economic benefit derived from the expenditures of the residents of the Project on eating, drinking, grocery, recreation, retail etc. This report does not include the economic impact of such expenditures_ Measures of Economic Impact Various measures can be used to indicate the impact of a policy or project on a region. Specifically, for this study, they are the increases in local employment, wages, tax revenue and output that result. Definitions of these measures are as follows: Employment is measured full-time equivalent jobs. Wages include wages, salaries, and proprietor's income only. They may include non -wage compensation, such as pensions, insurance, and other fringe benefits: Wages are assumed to be expended by households in the area at which the wage-earner works. Local taxes include additional revenues from both ad valorem and non ad valorem assessments. Direct expenditures include those sums expended for land acquisition, site preparation and all hard and soft costs associated with a project. Indirect expenditures are those sums expended within the local economy as a result of the "ripple" effect described earlier. Out ut describes total economic activity, and is essentially equivalent to the sum of direct and indirect expenditures (exclusive of wages and taxes). Objectives And Definitions Description of Results For the purpose of describing the total economic benefits of the Project, the related expenditures and economic activity stimulated have been broken into two categories: Developmental Annual Recurring Developmental expenditures include those expenditures related to the design and construction phase of the Project and related amenities. Annual recurring activities stimulated are those expenditures incurred in connection with the ongoing operation of the Project. z €fid= Uerk N 03- 879 Discussion Of The Results By Economic Indicators Impact Indicators We measured the Project's impact on four commonly used indicators of economic activity. Those indicators are: Jobs Wages Total output Local taxes Results of Indicators Exhibit I details the Project's direct and indirect impact on the above economic indicators for Miami. A summary of such impact follows: The economic indicator most commonly measured, and publicly reported on to gauge the economic impact of a public project is output. The impact of a project on the indicator output is often referred to as the project's economic impact. Impact of Construction The site preparation and construction expenditures, including soft costs and impact fees are estimated at $171 million. Such activity will create approximately 145 new full time equivalent jobs and employ a maximum of 170 workers during peak periods. The workers will earn approximately $20.2 million in direct wages. DEVELOPMENT (One Time) OUTPUT WAGES TAXES EMPLOYMENT Direct $ 154,625,757 $ 20,200,000 145 Indirect 135,946,966 17,759,840 $290.572.723 $ 37.959.840 145 ANNUAL Operational: Direct $ 2,800,000 $ 1,200,000 $4,582,839 20 Indirect 2.461.760 1,nSS-040 9; 5.261.760 $ 2.255.040 $4.582.839 20 r)3— 879 Discussion Of The Results By Economic Indicators Impact of Ongoing Operations As a result of the on-going operation and maintenance of the Project, Miami will gain approximately 20 new, permanent, full-time equivalent jobs. The wages of the workers who obtain these positions will provide an impact of approximately $2.2 million annually. The total expenditures for the Project's operations, will provide a new, permanent impact of $7.2 million annually to the City's economy. This impact consists of the effects of the direct expenditures from the maintenance, security and day-to-day operation of the Project, and the multiplied effects of such spending thus creating indirect benefits. Impact on Local Tax Revenues As a result of the construction and operation of the Project, various state, city and city governments and agencies would gain an estimated annual tax benefit of $4.6 million. Analysis by Economic Indicators Our analysis of the economic and tax benefits of the Project was done by each major phase of the Project. We identified the major phases to be developmental and operational. This analysis determines the economic benefits to the City by identifying such benefits for each of the phases. The effects on economic indicators used to measure benefits (employment, wages, output and taxes) were computed for each phase. Employment Employment is one of the most important economic benefits of the Project. It is one of the most accessible and direct benefits for the City's residents and it's residents and is a primary means by which developmental, operational and maintenance expenditures generate indirect economic benefits. A portion of this employment occurs on-site as a result of new spending at the retail enterprises, and a portion is derived from on-going operations of the Project. Further employment is generated off-site by the expenditures of employees of the Project and businesses located in the Project, at area businesses. As can be seen in Exhibit I, total short-term (developmental) employment will average 145 employees over an twenty-seven month period and a total on-going employment will average 20. The total on-going positions can be summarized as follows: Management Security Parking Maintenance/Facilities Retail .�< < noublic g 03- 879 Discussion Of The Results By Economic Indicators Wages The analysis deemed wages are a direct by-product of employment. As discussed in the above section, both on-site and off- site jobs are created. There were both temporary and permanent in nature. To compute the wages associated with the new employment we started with budgeted data directly related to the developmental and operational phases of the Project. Employment, such as construction related employment, was obtained directly from construction estimates. These numbers were tested for reasonableness. Output The output generated, as a result of the development and operations of the Project, is caused by the following type of expenditures: Development costs expended in the City (100%) Annual operational expenditures of management company New spending in the locality by employees of businesses located in the Project To incorporate the impact of dollars being respent and/or reinvested in the City, a multiplier was applied to total direct output. A multiplier of 1.8792 was used to determine total direct and indirect output created by the Project. This multiplier indicates that for every $100 spent in Miami, another $187.92 will be respent or reinvested in Miami. This multiplier was obtained from the Dade City Planning Department. Direct output from the developmental phase of the Project is primarily a result of developer costs. These costs include land acquisition, site preparation and soft and hard costs relating to the Project's construction. To determine the total output we determined what development costs were expected to be or had been spent in Miami. Total direct output during the development phase is $154.6 million. Total indirect output created by the direct respending in Miami is $135.9 million. Thus total Miami Output from the development of the Project is $290.6 million. The final component of output results from the direct operating expenditures of the Project, and the indirect benefits created as a result of the multiplier effect on direct output. The Developer provided us with an annual operating budget for the Project. An overall assumption was made that all expenditures would be spent initially in the City. �to =_ blic10 fh lerk Discussion Of The Results By Economic Indicators Output (Contd.) The total operating expenditures incorporate all estimated expenses of the ongoing operation of the Project. The impact of the retail enterprises was measured separately as an economic indicator. To incorporate the potential respending and reinvesting in Miami, the multiplier effect was measured. By applying a multiplier of 1.8792 to the total direct output from operating expenditures and the retail enterprises, we determined total output (direct and indirect) from on-going operating expenditures and retail sales. Local Taxes A key and significant benefit generated from the development and operation of the Project is taxes. Several types of tax revenue will be generated from this project including ad valorem taxes. Specific ad valorem taxes include real and personal property taxes. Other taxes include occupational taxes and community development taxes. New real property taxes will be assessed on the Project. The assessment is based on a predetermined mileage rate being applied to the taxable value of the real property. We computed real property taxes for the developmental phase based on the cost of the development of the Project. This assessment base is very conservative since tax on real property typically is assessed on appraised values and not actual cost. The basis for ongoing taxes is also overall cost. The mileage rate was obtained from the City Tax Collectors office relative to the Project's location. The projected annual real property taxes are approximately $4.6 million. Total ad valorem taxes assessed by Miami -Dade County are allocated based on mileage rates to certain governmental entities. Listed below is the allocation of projected tax revenue. City Operating $ 1,512,205 School Operating 1,449,326 County Operating 1,006,258 Debt Service - City 208,121 Debt Service -County 66,640 South Florida Water 102,010 Library Operating 83,043 School Debt Service 131,570 Florida Inland Navigation 6,579 Environmental Projects 17,087 TOTAL $ 4,582,839 03- 879 Discussion Of The Results By Economic Indicators Local Taxes (Contd.) Although not quantified, the City, through its receipt of allocated state sales taxes will receive an additional benefit as a result of the development and operation of the Project, and from the retail enterprises. Public Sector Costs Impact fees Very significant factors in measuring the economic impact on a specific region of a project are impact and other required development fees. A summary of these fees are listed below: City of Miami Developmental Impact Fee City of Miami Developmental Admin Fee Miami -Dade County Roadway Impact Fee Miami -Dade County School Impact Fee Building Permit Fee Installation Energy Fee Other Fees For the purpose of this economic impact analysis, fees are included as a part of the direct development cost (output). Impact fees total approximately $2.3 million and other fees total approximately $1.5 million. These fees are shown in detail in Exhibit II. r-. 03- 879 12 Exhibit List Exhibit I Summary of Economic Impact Exhibit II Impact and Other Fees 13 03- 879 Exhibit -1 TOTAL DEVELOPMENTAL OUTPUT $ 37,959,840 WAGES EMPLOYMENT TAXES DIRECT 20 $ 4,582,839 TOTAL BENEFITS $ 295,834,484 $ 40,214,880 165 $ 4,582,839 DEVELOPMENTAL $ 154,625,758 $ 20,200,000 145 OPERATIONAL 2,800,000 1,200,000 20 $ 4,582,839 TOTAL DIRECT $ 157,425,758 $ 21,400,000 165 $ 4,582,839 INDIRECT DEVELOPMENTAL $ 135,946,966 $ 17,759,840 OPERATIONAL 2,461,760 1,055,040 TOTAL INDIRECT $ 138,408,726 $ 18,814,880 TOTAL BENEFITS $ 295,834,484 J-40,214,880 165 $ 4,582,839 TOTAL DEVELOPMENTAL $ 290,572,724 $ 37,959,840 145 TOTAL OPERATIONAL 5,261,760 2,255,040 20 $ 4,582,839 TOTAL BENEFITS $ 295,834,484 $ 40,214,880 165 $ 4,582,839 f 14 03- 879 Exhibit -11 IMPACT AND OTHER FEES: Development Square Footages: 1) Total gross building area (with parking) 2) Maximum development area (FAR) 3) Residential F.A.R. 4) Restaurant F.A.R. 5) Office F.A.R. 6) Lobby area 7) Gross parking area B. Impact Fees: 1) City of Miami Development Impact Fee (Ord - 10426) 2) Development Impact Administration Fee (Ord - 10426) 3) Miami -Dade County Roadway Impact Fee 4) Miami -Dade County School Impact Fee Total of all Impact Fees C. Non -Impact Fees: 1) Miami Dade W.A.S.A. "connection fees" 2) Building Permit Fee 3) Installation Energy Fee 4) Major Use Special Permit Application Fee 5) Miami -Dade County Code Compliance 6) Radon Gas Fee 7) Fire Plan Review Fee 8) Ground Cover Fee 9) Land Use/Zoning 10) Zoning Review for Building Permit Fee 11) Certificate of Occupancy Fee 12) Application Fee Total of all Non -Impact Fees Total of all Fees for Project Source: City of Mami Planning, Building and Zoning Department. Mani Dade County Impact Fees Square Footage 1,345,283 830,050 722,928 3,833 4,635 2,200 392,800 Amount $ 492,211 14,766 704,808 1,124, 484 $ 2,336,269 $ 1,053,572 244,570 122,285 30,000 48,342 6,114 11,617 560 656 60 250 35 $ 1,518,062 $ 3,854,332 15 03- 879 TRACT "Bw I, FINGER COMPANY PLAT ' E PLAT BOOK 158, PAGE 97 1a /z 1 LOT 8 OSET 1/2- F, 3t c� _ L �In ss�ycnna7m) ) :;' N If O R T H GRAPHIC SCALE ( IN TOT ) 1 mee.m n SCALE: I" = 300" LEGEND ®. ,MNOYIGIf ^t yTy T 1 E. ®. GTpt EA51N - +-- OVERHFAO :Y1Rrs I\J i 1.t10• 6 0u11ER �- ^� PULE N. E. 19th STREET W _ gATFR VALVE � - yyLy TK1N . uTCH BASIN xIFT PE - Pur 800K Q -� 1UTv PIXF F-- TT 7� I If--1zL� >_ �! I L _L i- r V >< r,F—� / a I� - CONCRETE —,a -^1 - ASP141T PAVEMEJTT m - PIJIKNJG YC1Efi IJ rTT-r�0 Ip L 1 1 J L 1 1 1 J LL N.E.1Bth STREET T T T1 i TTT-1 (- C\1 r -ir-I r -Ir - Ir ti ) FIr s;L_JL_J L JL_JU' LrJL_ _I< L L 1 1_ J L 1 1 1 J _ -J L\, N. E. 17th TERRACE rT L L L J - -L1_ _LOCATION SKETCH SKETCH �In ss�ycnna7m) ) :;' N If O R T H GRAPHIC SCALE ( IN TOT ) 1 mee.m n SCALE: I" = 300" LEGEND ®. ,MNOYIGIf ®. GTpt EA51N - +-- OVERHFAO :Y1Rrs O - _Iectta 1.t10• 6 0u11ER �- ^� PULE CURE -.-- CHNN NN FENCE ®- TN 4ETLR L0. - IGENTYKAi10N W _ gATFR VALVE � - yyLy TK1N . uTCH BASIN xIFT PE - Pur 800K Q -� 1UTv PIXF �. • PAGE Y ISER SAN. - SANITARY V - FIRE HYDRANT PR.Y. - PER—IDIT REFERENCE MONUMENT - •Aoco POWER POIE O FIRE DEPART1,IW HMRANT - SIGN I� - CONCRETE - CTFXIOUI -^1 - ASP141T PAVEMEJTT m - PIJIKNJG YC1Efi IJ LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lela 1. 4 cud 5. IS— 7, of MIRAMAR THIRD AMENDED SUEDMSION, oc1ardi.9 la the mop or plat Ihef epl, os recorded ;n .lot fieok 5, Page 4, of the Putac Records of Mimi-Dode County, Flel;do. SURVEYORS NOTES: TMs it, 1's 'n Secl;on !I, lawnsn;p 53 South, Rouge 42 Eost, City of Miami, M;cm;-Dad. ..e n:y. Fon.a. AI docp,!s ore retarded n the Pudic Records cf Wlm;-Code Caunly, FmriEo uM_,, Whervrise noted. Landhe. h.rson e.r. abar«ted for e..smsnls end/or rights-of-ely of records pe, Lawy.la Toa Mswon,e Corpera6cn Commitment Oder Numb., 52128O95u. sIf,zih, ddte of October 8.2002. AE sesemem5 end or Y.ghls-of-.ay of ..cord Per Vtte -R -M mat om Olt mbl. ore I�Z4 cn this 6-"dary Survey'. 1M;th refelerce tc the Lawyer TRIC I- ,c! C,,,.mIt— Order No. 52128095LA, vim on eff-twe da•_ df October a. 2:.x2, I h ... by c Vy o. IeS.w SCHEDULE B - S -i- 2 1 - 7 Stood l E= pt; n E Re 1icl;o+s. durcotions and e.semenls az Shawn on the Plot of 31d Amended PI.! a1 W--. re_crded ;n Pbl E.- 5, Pogs 4. Reslricticns, dedicatice. Allects Parcel. Eoseme soda ncl Arfecl Farces_ 9 Easemen favor of F-ido Fover and L.ght Comp.ny, re.crded in O.R.B. 10734. Page 1541. (As la s 1 and 4) clfe-t, P cel and she a m c,w wms, condil;.r ,� eoser Me and other m ca ,aed m th e Memcran 1 .I PCs Site rse Agme,l. recorEed ;n O.R.S. 17982, Poge 428Msn p 0. (A. to Lt,ond 4) Allects Furcel but net subject tc lot oticn. It Ord;nonaes and Re.cluticns, recalled in O.R.E. 11114• Page 822; Allects Pavy but not subject tc 1 oUan. O.R.B. 12921, Page 2615; O.R.E. 12923. Poge 1622; O.R.E. 14255, Pao, 2399: O.R.E. 141415, Poge 2513; O.R.B. 151 E8, Page 2413; O.R.E. 15115. Page IE52: O.R.B. 16035. Page 3996; D.R.B. 15175. Page 1048; 0:. B. •:572, aa9. ..834; O.R.S. 17,2E. Page 260'_. Net a oars. Bearings rn r.I... d to on ssumed volae of SSI'04'28"H for the Northwesterly hue of zoid Let 1• crie.Mare .I by t.o ..I W653. - 0evo6ad. shown h,reon or. relative !a the Nol;crlol Geodetic Verticol Datum of 1929, based on C;ty ct Mnmi Bench Yoh, EJe 1;on ♦6.33 (+6.04 N.V.G.D.) Lacked in the S.W. comer .t the intxsection p1 N.E. 19th Slr.et and 8;ecoyn. Boul.vard. Lands s n hem are acated In redeml Flood Zones AE (EJ 10), AE (EI 11) and VE (EI 11) per C,m —ity Panel No.1120650 0183 J, baled March 02, 1994 and r,v;eed July 17, 1995_. - Cimenrer„ indi.alb h _ ore Neltl m.osured using a toll sml;an eleat is e;stonce mec.laeT.nt (EDM). uMes- otherw;.e noted. Lords s,...yn hv_or. ccM.lning 55,595 sous. (..1. ar 1.50E ac ea, e._ or less. - I`-;.;- ;s;on cr ya.are 1:10,000 - Cammerc; Class Survey. Roof o nal -.ted uM.ee ath ;se shown. - Ude 9 -. tl o rav mems and/ar andergroarg� Q time -1 s I �+, oto e R'1;(QF��L�I - •- , n ... _ ._ I' - e by n y,.r �c SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATION TO: UNION PLANTERS EM1KS, NA STEARNS N:.T'sTE TYLLER WtJSSLER N ..DESF LKWERS '..r --E WSURANCE CORPORATION - TERRA -ADI ;NTERNATIOIJAL BAY=HORE. LLC. GREENBERG TRAURIG. P.A. s -_.'.36 SURVEYORS CERTIFICATION: Cie r f c ris i 1 hereby .. 6 tee Lh;s �Eoundary & Tcpcgr`ph;c Surv_y" w.s mode unN_r :rry resGcns;Dle cnarge cr. Janucry 20. 2003, and meets 1M_ N4Mmam IC17-_at _tandords as set foam by the orida Bard . 472.27. al Staturs onE 4apG.r. M Chcpler 51G17 -E, Florida Atlm;lNSlrpGve [ods, pursuant to Section 17x.027, Flar;aa '.es. ra.FTP1a. eee Mdkew. M M u�et.r� FORTI VY I S, MC., LR3653 Danr,, The Farm 03— 879 stn1.'F�erd..,.c CCiQ Q LU a � O Wrr^LL cc v) 0_ O V J IC W Q a- 0 o Q /- 00LL O Zn� C:) m U O 0) T STC Iit:11— !Dwg, Ro. 0 NICHOLS BROSCH SANDOVAL & ASSOCIATES, INC. Architecture & Planning 161 Almeria Avenue oral Gables, Florida 33134 Tel (305) 4435206 Fax (305) 446-2872 Email inFo®nbsorch.com www.nbsarch.com AAC 000680 METROPOLIS BAYSHORE PROJECT Drawing List May 6, 2003 Cover Sheet Survey L1 Ground Level Landscape Concept L2 Recreation Level Landscape Concept A 1 Site Plan A 2 Lobby Level Plan A 3 Ground Floor Plan A 4 Intermediate Ramp Level A 5 Typical Loft / Parking Level A 6 Pool Deck Level A 7 Resident's Club Level A 8 Penthouse Level / Typical Residential Level A 8a Penthouse Level / Typical Residential Level A 9 Bayshore Elevation A10 Northeast 19th Street Elevation A 11 South Elevation A 12 West Elevation A 13 Section Through East Tower Zoning Analysis Unit Breakdown 5 , + the public 03- 879 ✓- I I pL /r 1111 11 �� 11111 1111 11 11 hill 1111 1111 11111 IINNI _I_I 11 IIIII Naz.- f N LEGAL DESCRIPTION ,1+'f La od Lot 5 of 'limn Addlbn to Miemi' Net Book 5 . N OPEN SPACE 1 "0. equate foot of open space or private mcleawn apace shall be provided xl. P 2, ,� r for every 10 Square feet of maklemlal Ilea area." PROPERTY AREA 376,184 equate feet (9ro.) REQUIREMENTS g,v 3,-a t it eV•f' /r 1111 11 �� 11111 1111 11 11 hill 1111 1111 11111 IINNI _I_I 11 IIIII Naz.- f N LEGAL DESCRIPTION ,1+'f La od Lot 5 of 'limn Addlbn to Miemi' Net Book 5 . N OPEN SPACE 1 "0. equate foot of open space or private mcleawn apace shall be provided Pay. - e puple records, Werri-Debt, County, FL. RECREATION AREA for every 10 Square feet of maklemlal Ilea area." PROPERTY AREA 376,184 equate feet (9ro.) REQUIREMENTS 85,595 squarefeat (net) N OPEN SPACE Required: 83,852 9F (836,524 a"F A-10) PROPERTY ZONINGSD.6'Cenkal Camnerdal R.itlenliel INNI ProvNed. 63,805 SF INN Dstnq 8,825 Exbdor-Levels 1 W, 200 _i III 4,230 pool Top Garden- Leve14100 ALLOWANCE RESIDENTIAL Floc area V all rulderd'Ial uses shall not exceed 68.750 Recreation l� Span 6 Pod Plaza- LV 900, 1000 FLOOR AREA RATIO 7,20 bmN the areae b1 area. T20 x 176,184 = 838,524.8 SF PARKING PROVISIONS 'For in -&g units there anal, be a min[—.1 one parkin spas and a maximum d two Spec..' N ACTUAL RESIDENTIAL East Tower, Lilts: 523,942 SF INN •For restaumnD, para, one per 100 SF net peUon area' FLOOR AREA RATIO West Tower, legs. 309,Bt7 SF 3,515+100=38 spree 'For 3,935 end O= M uses, a midmum 4ane per 1,000 SF d gmee Aoo� INI LobbvAl.s: 2765 SF Total FAR Ar.: 838,524 SF t _II_ area and a maximum of we par 100 SF.• Actual Reddemitl F.AR.: 710 real 524 NII 2,300+ 1000= 3 spaces 'For business and professional Am use, a minimum of one perking Spaer per 600 SF.° N ALLOWABLE fpm a-ee for ellnMrealdwdiel uses shtllnd exceed 1 2,335. 800 - 3 apes. _NON-RESIDENTIAL 12 tlmea the grow lot ane. IINI Prkirc ProWsbrs: UNNS Spaces FLOOR AREA RATIO 1.2 x 118.184 • 139,420 SF (�'e xoae Mr umb East Loge 54 54 NACTUAL 2,335 SF IN E.t LORA 379 379 11' III R(etafice Restaurant 3,635 3E Eur Tower/PH 15 15 FLOORR AREA RAT,TLAIL FLOOR AREA RATIO Retell 2300 SF ,Nest Lolls 30 30 � Total FAR Alae. 6,470 SF NNI West Twver 262 262 W.t TowwlPH 12 12 NNNI Actual Non-Reaidential FAR: 0.07 (aAre 116IM) IINI TotalR.Idenaal Space: 752 752 • TOTAL The total floor aN on an indNidlal lot Retail and Service Space: 3 ALLOWABLE FAR, AND eeel84for ftbuildings shall not exceed 8.4 gmee the gmee bt area.' 11 '111 Office: 3 Restaurant Spec.: 39 ACTUAL FAR, Actual Resider" F, A.R. 710 INI:.... Guest Spaces' 48 Actual N-Reaideneal F.A. R, : 0.D7 1 Total AvalNhN Parking (ANI Levet) "5 INI Total Actual FAR, 7.27 IIIII Teal Required Perking li 797 ALLOWABLE DENS" 500 Units per Acre 1.506 Acne x 500 Unilb'An ll M Units Mowed N REQUIRED ACCESSIBLE SPACES Required Acc.eWla Parking Sparse I'l li N NUMBER OF UNITS 752 Total (448 Phase 1; 304 Phase 2) PARKING SPACES2914845= 17 Required Aco.slli Van Parking Spec. = 1 in every E N 8ETBACKSI 54Bayshore Dave and Nonheast4M PveTwe 7.B = 2 YARDS REQUIRED Cr all interior abutting property line N PROVNDEDACCESSIBLE Provided Accessible Parking Sperm 17 N SETBACNSI 6tl Bayehore Drive PARKING SPACES Provbed Accaesihle Van Padang Spaces 3 YARDS PROVIDED Tat N ft -4m 11 011 11 11 11111 5'at slay 11111 .11° 0' at nterbr abutting line - - - 1 11 I,�. . � .. � 72t�. RlOP1d NEST L r LlX0Taauaoo A i'�,l So-'j,L'!4 '14-..E�''1f'=i MV; .#•Z N? EVEL320o>wnu goo .A'# dA IPf?1- �•li'r£: / (B Neal EAST 10eER WSR leran 1,100 1.111 Nal all 911 oll 119 11122 roMElvaoelTwFs (BwrNe) a',.«,v .~' ., 1.218 SF• 12 a 1 1M 1102 713 BBJ TYPIC.a1 LFVELatlpp Mile 110D 3;�` M •�.. y'.' M .f`:„)rY >.*^.k 1!-:r; 'ill. .1 ":ri NFir TONIR UNR LElELS1,00—J3g4 w cNaONoeL yr �:{f 'S..tY '”„� ^`J .y�$1�.; (9l kvae roNERu nor Si° 1916 M See n3 See 1,115 J66 8.11 8M ill. 611 eEnwoFi-was((..,� nol—, .••�t.t SF 4% 1,010 6e9 9M f 129 601 ESB 9M Spa ttPGAl1 LSA20p'Mua30p fir., 1 A 1 ., .,p:. t;,” .,-9M i� R,."Ae' ! lb. a, .3k. ;E;1 STT WER Ward umut 31W Mvb Slop y l 'i :f!F'. I2 kcal EAST 701ER LAM Se.1,938 Ste n9 69e Itis M S. 616 1.11, i3l, TOxc6eme11paa (4Nrwn .911H,"!4, SF t,a11,M0 Sea BOB ISI In SOP - 1,e1B TrFeolL LRELS MOO -U yytTs.En5Ea,,�� �.1 „ja /+'::�Y� "T'1CtF'°^�9R. .R r??1 �.F 3.•II at•r[.ie �' 1 INN 19 MMf SF Bps 1,316 631 I,,,e 1M all aM 1,2ni 1.361 1111 NIIIIt aAS77(tw Pi47epu.N rives 1 1111 PB.'iN0p6E LfVEL64600 T1RL 180[ u kval yy� y,� .✓�M# SF- PRITNOui te.Ela M00 MN1000 y�rmlWENyMFl.MEftag'.yO . 1.W LJM 1,14 n t 16M (31 an. February 11, 2003 Submittal to Internal Design Review Committee CrrY OF MIP:U, 1 February 18 2003 OFFICE OF HEARIN , S(If =r',- PLANS REVIEVI Submittal to Large Scale Development Review ` nBNID Dole I 3 � March 19, 2003 zw . Date ! Submittal to Urban Design Review Board U3 vbnulB • naK _. _ . _ _ May 6, 2003 By. �gRalNra �1 Submittal to MUSP B YSHORE 1900 NORTH BAYSHORE DRIVE MIAMI, FLORIDA Sterra-di INT ERNATIONAL � °� TERRA A.D.I. INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPER Q 1200 BRICKELL AVENUE, SUITE 630, MIAMI, FLORIDA 33131 1111 lin INI 1 III /r 1111 11 �� 11111 1111 11 11 hill 1111 1111 11111 IINNI _I_I 11 IIIII /N 1111 INI Int Nil � a� INN INN INN NEI IIIII IIII NII INNI INN IIII _i III INII 1_ 11 IINI 1111 NEI INII INN 1111 _ INI 'q11 t _II_ I1111 INN NII 1 NI NNNI 1111 IINI IIII NII 1 IN INI 11' III 1!111 INI 1111 � INI NNI fl 11 NNNI IINI INI' , 1 In NNI 11 '111 (IINI INN INI:.... __ 1 NI INI 1111 IIIII loll NEI 1 111 1111 11 11 IIN11 INI NII 1 NI NNI 11 _II INII INI 'INI 11 011 11 11 11111 1111 11111 .11° - - - 1 11 NII 11 11 IIIII Im 'NNI _ 1 INI 'N1I 11 11 IINNI IINI NIIINA - - IN NI 11 it 0111 1111 011 - - 1 - 11 INII 11 _II_ 11111 INN NNI 1 INN 11' 11 11111 1111 NIIIIt -- -- 1 1111 IINI III 11 (INII INl ''INI -- -- 1 NI 'NNI 11� 11 INII 1111 INII I�VFINI� - -- 1 111 INI 111 11 INII INI 1111 1 1 NI NNNI 11 11 11111 IINI INII y - 1 111 NEI ''_I 11 IINI INI 1111 IBI Nm n In unl Ne nn 1 NI NNI 11 I IINI INI NII - -- 1 111 N11 11 III IINI ININ NNI I� _ NI INI 11 '11 11111 IINI NNI �I - - IN (NNNI NNI 1111 NNI 1 IN INNI 111, 11 1!1111 1111 IIIII - - NI MINI III 11 Ii11111111 1111 i - - 1 nl 1111 NII 11 IIIII INN INI -- 1 NI INI 1111 INII INI NN 1 111 NII 11 'll 11111 INI all - -- - IIIII NNNI 1111 is million, ml 11 �1 ,IIIII 1111 IIII 1111 tl 11 Nil IIII INI 1111 11 11 IIIII I/Nii 11 IMIIIIIg II NIIIINr� INF■:I /// INI ■■ ■■ /N 1111 1111 N/ INN ■■ 11 in n n u 1p n N m u III■If _I11nIm,I IIII■IINI,, NNI ••• 1111 NII .... ./r M/ IN N. /■ 11 �.. 11 11 11 010111110 10111111111111110 m 1 101■01111 p 11 "1 u NI l IN,■II m NIIIIII r■1 11 N . IIIIIIINrI . NI u IIIIlmull IINS I /N // ■■ /// NII /// IN N a NI H u IuIlnNlq 11 i 111 11 11 m■IINaI 111 i Iln■il /N NII, // �/ /// n u NII /// Im // 1_ 111 N 11 n111nN1q 11 IM 11 1■ In�nNIII W II Int■II II I `��� �IIIIII,aR IINIIII' SITE �"°° dw . Ire o F �. teexy. . B 3 N. E. 19th STREET / / 9» TRACT "B" r 7 r-�w FINGER COMPANY PLAT - - - T T T IF _ �z� / / / / / P" r° " sa"• I PLAT BOOK 158, PAGE 97 I i j �I LL11J� LJ� �I L_-- r�F - --- -- - ----------------------------- ( _ -- --- -- - -- -------------r I erre ... ... - - dTa �wN ALT �T; LTJLTJ LJ�i ` y IRAse O O I �\ L L 11 J L 11 J_ J LL J_ 1 JL- - J)-- -- J QO Z SY � ti N. E. 18th STREET ct) F \� r T T T -I r T T T 7 r w F / / \"� ♦ \\ Ll11J L11J_J w LWTI_ I r - U F MIRAMAR /�-- - 8 AN \I r _ �r _ r _ �r -_ I ][ _ I ��` / r� 0 PLAT BOOK 5, PAGE 4 ♦ - - - - u - ` ` J / I _II I _ _I I_ IF V 7/ z o Q CQ jLTJL-1 LTA IM LJL__w< 5 -STORY BUILDING °� r /419 ♦� N . 17th TERRACE /� o at�rt4 \\\ q9 I 7- T- � rTT � IT -7 ��- -I .. . . ,R _ 35:00 - i:27 :. -.. a. � \� � ♦ L L L L L i J_ � � u 1 1_ --- y �3 el LOCATION SKETCH z a p/lo+^ w�. ♦ o GBl� \.\. SCALE: 1 " = 300' e '> \ a P ,J• �'9i�/ ♦ \\ N LEGEND a rn 0 ®' o �� x a o Y / ,vr \\WIRES R app. LIGHT POLE E 2-W MIB e: ov ER O ,P'ap' / �'.' . xy • \ .. T p - WATER METER - CHNN LN( FENCE V 1 a+ aJ /L's.+1..s.r6. ... W�'y� a (1na O ♦ H ea - WATER VALVE _ EnENn�nDn mr.rxdw ut.x -AM ri caw / _ d '� A7v� a+sxV"A / / .9 'A `-y� �t, I . aTCN BAan INJ:rr \ Pe -Pur Booty y 'p y \-b, ..\ ❑ - UnLW POLE PG PAGE \ p rSANTNIff _ - • Glis sAPHIse SCALE es ■ - RISER FIRE MRANT PAM PERMANENT REFERENCE uONUMEM W BS NE 19th \ • - 4'S7 -FIRE DEPARTMENT IItOP.1f1f W FDuw 1/2' PPE • - wow POWER POLE O z � � A. /' / D. (1/20/03) �rWL e �i ..\ ( 1N start) - S1aN 0 _ CatemTE cy STREET �. _ m . C EN a . ASPHALT PAVEMENT m \� PARx1N9 METER ® GZrT atl s1.'IR LEGAL DESCRIPTION: C'� %i +OO / / / / i / �ttx asix - a o- 3.02 \ \\\\ I Lreeord. 4ln Plat Book BBpkGc 7P Q"MIRMUR RD 4, If the (AMENDED SUBOMSmON�axo��n toFlorthe map or plot thereof. as t,] / LOT 1 1O 5(O car T a .�. a ° R ads,N(.. \ SURVEYORS NOTES: �O z g L) - Die eRs In Seation 31. Township 53 South, Range 42 East. City of Mkmi, Miomi-Dodo m ~ d �� 9• ��'. LOT 6 \ fp'f� d' O / / 'Y.� > _ All .n , ., erre NI daumsnb an neerdad in the PUDIk Roorde of Miami -Dodo Caurdy, Florida antes otherwise atoll. crL N 022083 Plotlad 9' x / R( / en lelc \ I -Lona sham hereon sm abstracted far •a•NnaMa nd/or fights of-waYY Of Ns par Lo a TNIs IneuramCorporation Commitment Order Number 52128095LA, wNeall" dote of O 1 8,2002. pet Ding. 022082 P,.)d Book. Sa9/d RL Job. No. wg. DNa 2003D-002 of 1 / / (t raw xwL r arnET (t V "% Per title commitment that an Plot bbte an shown Cll asern•nb and ar right -f -way of nmrd "Bounds 'Boundary .o- � paEi¢ xrNxoll / / 1/Y this Su / O . 7.ap \ 1 / MID HO A). (1/20/0.7) , yr„ rW tlOn, Order No. 52128095LA, rdh n effe<W date of Dot raf• , 20 to Nth Lar Tiff• Inall Ca October B, 2002. I hereby <artHy ae Tarnow.: \ ov / ew <a'"p� M18' 1 B'28" k` 1 SCHEDULE B - S.Uon 2 ��\ // / ® y° / •I / R-102.99 d'' 11 I t - 7 Standard Ems / \ -{��yy Ipy��• \ oaG,ie" S U<a• / / / L-32.91 SET 1ML & D181C e Rest �ne5 dPoleatliero and --t. ae shorn a the Plot of 3rd Amended Plat of Mlrmor, recorded M y R•s(r1<Bgq.' 1 L11 \ ® OT4 0 l_ / O. rat / / UMW 4' OFFSET ! (1/20/03) ` 1 1 1 dedie nes Affects flo-1. Ea•menb do not Affect parcel. 9 Easement FlorWwe a Por and Light Company, recorded In O.RB. 10704, page 18I2. favetl / r 1 ` ( Lot* AflectArW /gtg�oPR1wOrawe pl[ '� `o ELu IV erA r oax NJIa, (1/a/an I ndin as) hown on su t0 Terme, ante, Malone. wNTeMe and other Ianbinnd in the 1,1,, of PCS Site �'q_� moo dmi i O.R.S.roel 11x798 4280. (Ae to Lob t and 4) \ <prL� ' m P but not \ ` P� / .i�h / / �^ • • 1/ rOdrinan<M and Realudons, reaord•d In O.RB. 11114, Page 822; ANects P' -Wbut not b)•et to bcatlon. LOT 2 \ �„ a �rOW(• / / ✓1 '} 1 O.R.R. 72923, Poq• 2678: O.R.B. 72923. Page 2822; O.R.B. 14258, Page 2399; O.R.B. 14616, Page 2513; O.R.B. X168, P�q. 2473; O.R.B. 1561& Poq 1852; O.R.B. 160J3, Page 3998; O.R.B. 16478, Pogo 1048; 16872. P 1634; O.R.B. 7732 Po 2603. D O O !int a. rt / SpIILL�� FF��t I�/1l�r�I� I� /KNOW A n(vnlA� U MIR�D1 A (EHO[ED @�-yI� pp /�� aLvLI¢J®Q 0014NON .. .1 �, Bearings Mason an M•rnd to on aaunwd wiue of S51.04'28^N for the Northwesterly Iia of said Lot 1. and eNd-d by ba at non R 1"" L83653. 6 rF� m5t /l 1 'rye 1 Ebvoti . shown Hereon am nla6w to the NaUoalGeodetic VerbaDatum of Datuof 1929. based a City of Mkmi Bench MarkElemilm +6.30 (+6.G4 N.V.G.D.) Located in the S.W. aomer at the Intersection of N.E. 1&h Sinet and Biscaya 8ouiward. -Lands shown heon an laobd In Federal Flood Zan AE (EI 10), AE (EI 11) and VE (D 11) \ per CommunllyrePanty No. 120550 01&3 J. Dated March 02. 1994 and rated July 17. 1995. >,� •� O if M'P•„Ac LOT 5 1 1 - Dimensions Indkubd heron an field --.d using a total station ei•Mnnic distau msaanmsM (EDM), -I- otherwise noted. / LOT 3 /'\epWt 1 , 1 - Lands shown hereon containing 55.595 ear feet or 1.506 ora. mon or (see. V' O�1 / g •25' ` i prem Ian of .1-. 1:10.000 - Commercial close Survey. -Roof overhang not located unlaa otherelsa shown. 77 / 1/v ; _ UMeness to lmprowm•nb pod/or underground aarooahmenb not shown unless otherness bmaatd. Leel dacnptlon shown Moron fumished by siert. m ~ d / / LOT 6 \ y/t , LOT 6 SET/ ` /� ' I 1 CITY OF MIAMI 1 OFFNX OF PLANSEV HEARING BOARDS J e11AXl,'1MOdq • t1m6 ( __ ! � ' I SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATION TO: UNION PUNTERS ... NA STFi1RNS WEAVER MILLER WEISSLLR TION FF L SITTERSON, PA UWYFRS TRLE INSURANCE CORPORATION TERRA -ADI ILNERNAnONA1 BAYSNORE, LLC. 1 GREEN1, TRA 980. PADrawat SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATION: h•rty carDfy Ulol Nb •Boundary ! Topagraphk Surwy' de a y roponsible aharq• J 7 20, 2003, pd mesh iM. Mlnlmum Tech,= $to d rds pt 7arM by to FlorWo Board of PmfaMoal Hua rA 120/03 S.W. 1•.20 DCFJR crL N 022083 Plotlad 9' x B3d•"' -�' \ / N \ ' I .{ { By it 7yNpp 01616 -. 1 SignaNrc _ ... .. - . •••�-" S M: and Mappsn in Chapter 61017-fi Florida Ad instrotrve Cods, P nl to Sect! 472027, Fiorillo �S�taottuutbas �� _ r 'Not wxd wrawd.rWrue rd dwarlsswxmiwed ... 1,z g kl• &A Faft Li eesed Sa 'arwrd Implies,t.; rt.�2 °o FORTIN, LEAVY, SIULES, INC., LB3653 M t ..�• t 9J• a� 1. '12 - -. .... 7 By. 03 Daniel C. Fortin, For The Flan - ---• Surveyor tl Mapper, LS2853 Stab d Floris. 121/038:184 pet Ding. 022082 P,.)d Book. Sa9/d RL Job. No. wg. DNa 2003D-002 of 1 PL SCALE: 1°=10'- ER -LAZA :l W,'CENCHEB OCM d/i].POI WIYLtJL IC/..'1'1ael tl.!"f e�alell /t'w"D 4xe TIR alWtbi GD t Geec•leb/ Dlv«/'feil/ 4' - la' - NII Grropy ILurn Ple•« Piim viw •. Al' DOOM"a/wn L8 e L puew Luc dun euMertl - yy -. _ e' a !. Tr« -d Prw•d . 1- 6ouynvor.T« n/ Yhilt Truk PD b Pb«M D/eay I«/ xai.er . G' n/cl'•d Nub ev/IBM T.x+t D/N Mlm c mu ! P/nbMe Wil • b' -'x' - e' a Hud. YMmur RR as � ��M x ]s y°°'� N N./tl-TH tl. TM•. GAT :x w Pam« Gur.ourun , °, a 4mm� a n.a to Gn« n»mu, G� «•tl«« Drunp«• r' bed Pam • . t' D - 4 a 411en Im Grr nmlmw GES Con«Ipu 4•ec. 6a ceu tm b vw BNtawood e- -x3' m411om Nlma..,r a, • w dy IM Y�� IU tied a et« ! . ]6 ! 41wr. ! Pu+le P. Pa nM. FIG sm 'clMP`M'Y Ise !.! is 14Iwn .nt c«e •e ..r, I1R1 b Ivor/ ww tluN m>/'YNleui Is' -1m• - am• ! 4no-. Nn to a.•, r o-. e.e« JAS IHe y'1'iemH«.InI'n"puarouun r•. ie' - u• > wuce x cn c«.« LEG �rlap• m .'Ev«g•« 61st 6mm Oum Li¢iwl .' -14' b' - O i 6/ibn b Plea P« i r'ION MauuM Ds ci•ee D Dv N G«e• PI/nl RD • 3 xD - !' b 411en N i To du NEP Dm Nepyee4p • Gu!/u ev«0 �« 4' - V la . O' 9 41wn �° �� PNnu Pat Hln PHI tl«m"•n e.11cun :e �i � L«r Pn od«tlron ! !D !' - !s' " 4IIm Dom"" •- ` !/1�iN � 0 xm' - 14` xm' - ]4 3 411en Ful to dw 1 on a•nv SEA sas Bu.avl cow. ama4 . a, umv« SPAa am an..entu . as . aD on m o... L.re• w. !PPP STR ° mb o'we !'-!D' xD'-a m4u lPH.t. Pr Pe. na. THR b TMM...tl n/ Iuy P/Im /D- ♦e -a e4I'o, PL SCALE: 1°=10'- ER -LAZA :l W,'CENCHEB OCM d/i].POI WIYLtJL IC/..'1'1ael tl.!"f e�alell /t'w"D 4xe TIR alWtbi GD t Geec•leb/ Dlv«/'feil/ 4' - la' - NII Grropy ILurn Ple•« Piim LC •. Al' DOOM"a/wn L8 e L puew Luc dun euMertl - yy -. _ e' a !. Tr« -d Prw•d . 1- 6ouynvor.T« n/ Yhilt Truk PD b Pb«M D/eay I«/ xai.er . G' n/cl'•d Nub ev/IBM T.x+t D/N Mlm c mu ! P/nbMe Wil • b' -'x' - e' a Hud. YMmur RR as � ��M x ]s y°°'� N N./tl-TH tl. TM•. GAT :x w Pam« Gur.ourun CODS G1Ye1 P01 a)DIAIIRA/l. / t.ttlggi ryna� xaIONT IPI�"m co]+rAa1�R � A4L •. Al' DOOM"a/wn le' - xm' le• - ]m' a 6tlisn s Purtte P« Pat, Y u.v« AZV 1Dn�pZerusm•l'V«I.8/u' ]D' . !' ]D' - a' l 411« NII Gnopy n/wn.t GAT :x w Pam« Gur.ourun , °, a 4mm� a n.a to Gn« n»mu, G� «•tl«« Drunp«• r' bed Pam • . t' D - 4 a 411en Im Grr nmlmw GES Con«Ipu 4•ec. 6a ceu tm b vw BNtawood e- -x3' m411om Nlma..,r a, • w dy IM Y�� IU tied a et« ! . ]6 ! 41wr. ! Pu+le P. Pa nM. FIG sm 'clMP`M'Y Ise !.! is 14Iwn .nt c«e •e ..r, I1R1 b Ivor/ ww tluN m>/'YNleui Is' -1m• - am• ! 4no-. Nn to a.•, r o-. e.e« JAS IHe y'1'iemH«.InI'n"puarouun r•. ie' - u• > wuce x cn c«.« LEG �rlap• m .'Ev«g•« 61st 6mm Oum Li¢iwl .' -14' b' - O i 6/ibn b Plea P« i r'ION MauuM Ds ci•ee D Dv N G«e• PI/nl RD • 3 xD - !' b 411en N i To du NEP Dm Nepyee4p • Gu!/u ev«0 �« 4' - V la . O' 9 41wn �° �� PNnu Pat Hln PHI tl«m"•n e.11cun :e �i � L«r Pn od«tlron ! !D !' - !s' " 4IIm 11, ro du !/1�iN sd,.Pl«/ anximeu uw a Imt D«rl IW.Mw xm' - 14` xm' - ]4 3 411en Ful to dw 1 on a•nv SEA sas Bu.avl cow. ama4 . a, umv« SPAa am an..entu . as . aD on m o... L.re• w. !PPP STR ° mb o'we !'-!D' xD'-a m4u lPH.t. Pr Pe. na. THR b TMM...tl n/ Iuy P/Im /D- ♦e -a e4I'o, NT B Vd W -ROUGE \I w .1 4' WALICW'A T v► ® ° L NS RE • .♦tom r. / z O 5-0��003 I•'AR-2 n-7003 J. PEREZ E. FU61EIR M. er•rlvy i/ the W.Pp tY F FueOr Mkry YeooleW P.a. 't V ev Iva'rn0e¢t of Mnitt Wet cevvvl he rvproduceQ W eq � mlthavt .dtw mve«t. SHEET L 1 OF TWO SDARr WRO n! , z �` \g i� L�� .......;. I / 4 BAUMAN DEVELOPMENT wt F.P.L. � / GEAR VAULT FIRE PUMP RESTAURANT/BAR � GALLERY PHASEI 1_ (OWER ELEVATORS ROOM I � ENTRY �> ON. SEATING \ I � LOFT ELEV. / :k. FIRE J I'I P ZA I h� i i MECHANICAL COMMAND Y FOU m LOBBY RADS MCCFI � i I � r MECWUCAL 3 \ MAIL L `� DN. SEATING GUEST — ��� PARKING (24 SPACES) I(r�KffV'IRY i' MP,CH EL+7S u ' RAMP LOADING rxAse 2 aAYE ------{, ToaER ELevaroRs MECHANICAL BEtow SPACE \ swrrc)t / �AR LOBBY LEVEL PLAN \ LEVEL 200 (PARKING LEVEL P2) 0 1 32 4E 61 CITY OF MIAMI OFFICE OF HEARING BOARDS I� PLANS REVD I I EXISTING � i I � � / \ � Public works - DRte , Q it APARTMENTBUTLDINO I I III � I, 7v.^.in -'Date \ / PianrlPl R 4 n-(7aYe-rJ 03 V 7 V `���•��� I I I i I, I � 'I A � 8k�naWre above ilxs +wt imWY approval .. - zw TV, A2 / r OPERTY �\ LN CORRIDOR \ ® TRASH ROOMPH / / O / r I I ELEVATORS VALET �� 57 56 � 55 � SERVICE HALL / / R ACCESS 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 9 l 10 11 12 \ 5 I 25 74 23 22 21 20 19 15 17 r 16 15 14 13 C !�I sCE N i 26 L) Lrl 21 GUEST � PARKING I II 'i 29 ) 29 30 31 32 33 I ! 34 35 36 31 39 39 40 41 2 — I AMP \ I \ POR \ f \ 49 IlIB 41 46 45 � l 44 I \ J V ENTRY PHASES V A� LOBBY ELEVATORS U l \ TRASH � ROOM \ BUILDING \ SUPPORT I \ \ \ C' \ i I I \ I I IIII \ 3 LOADING DOCK �i 4 5 BAUMAN DEVELOPMENT GROUND FLOOR PLAN LEVEL 100 (PARKING LEVEL PI) 0 16 32 48 64 CITY T,F MAW OFFICE OF HEARMIG BOARDS PLANS REVI1W PoIIC - DR ----- Za.Jrp Dpta —. Mam w - SIT- - � 03- 8 9° SiBN+ture aw. ,;.Z not imply approval - F -4 A3 i i , IARF C LOFT B II A i ���Q�/ BBRBATH 1 BRR BATH � weF A 1 / BRl1 BA LOFT D 1HR/1BA7$ v / / PHASE 1 ELEVA'FOR,S 18 17 I 1BR/1BATH DEN 1 20 l9 / / LOFT f \21 � IBR/B3ATH 24 23 `� > i 26 1 BR2Bi1'fH �� 1 3 4 DEN D 26 LOFT , , I Ili I ) ELEVATOR / � 35 II 36 137 38 I it II I I 27 �I LOPT H I I BR/28 — RESIDENTS it DEN � PARKING (73 SPACES) — � m III 1)3Rf2BATH 30 31 72 33 34 �I DEN I '. PHASE 1 I� I �I AHS RAGE r STORAGE / I \ \ PHASE2 l ♦ LOFrI ELEVATORS HRI2 BATH ♦ DFrK BM 7312 / ♦ \ \ 2BRf2 HA V 71/ \ , / ♦ v� \ wFrL I � 2 BM BATH 69 LOFT I � � ♦ � ��� �� I Hw1BATH I \ ♦ \ \\\ LOFT \ \ \ 1BR/IBAIBA7'H I I ♦ DEN I l III � ♦ I I �ll IIS i I I I I \ 49 48 \ BAl1MA.N DEVELOPMENT 42 / 45 44 \ \ \ 43 \ 156 56 v 67 \ \ 600 \ �61 68� A 62 \ �ubli ,A s",Nh ei S City , �`a igClerk TYPICAL LOMPARKING LEVEL /\ LEVEL 300 i \ CST's ;^faPAfA�I / OFFPCE ns ]i .k6i':s4^ @OlLRDS (PARKING LEVEL P3) r-e_G tdt MVI EW ♦ DD/� -- /-Gate""- / Date ♦ Cy. \ Fl • 0819 0 16 32 48 64 �Q10 876 z 0 0 U U Q A4 LOFT LOFTB , / O Bw2BATH IBR/2BATHk DEN �{(•T \ LRJA / ewI BA LOFT D BwIHATH / PAASEI ELEVATORS LIDFT t B �1TH 26 25 24 2i 2 EN LOFT F 27 \ -,,.,DEN °B DIE 28 / p � 6X 29 PARK ON RAMP / 30 \ G 31 li , 1 BRYIBA'jH 1 5 4 DEN 32 LOFr ATOR ELEV� / 10 11 12 1 14 15 I III II I LOFT H J] 1 il 711RR'I BATH ® 34 RESIDENTS 6% I I,i I I DEN PARKING III II I I 33 (87 SPACES) PARK RAN II II I 1 III II I1` 11 \ - m, \ I -t#it 1 --1 BRaRATH 'i, 36 31 38 39 40 41 42 DEN PHASE PHASE 2 / I II \ RESIDENTS r 53 I STORAGE J / PHASE2 II II \ \\ ♦ LOFT3 \ ELEVATORS 2BR/1 BATH - II v v LOFT K BATH 2 B /87 86 Ar? LOFT L 2 BRl2 BATH � 83 qJ? I \ \ \ \\ LOFT M I BR/IBATH i\ LO 1 BwIBAiBAiH \ \ DEf I III I ��'It v I / I I 59 \ \\ 57 l \ 70 72 73 74 V \75 \ \ 76 / 62 , \77 / ' \ em ' \ OFFICE LtF i PLAT PObp,,, wort -DI BY; LOFTTARKING LEVELS 400 THRU 800 (PARKING LEVELS P4 THRU P1 l) 0 16 32 48 64 LEVEL ■ MAY I, 2003 ■ A5 bn,� r;,[, L l POOL DECK LEVEL LEVEL 900 0 16 32 48 64 CITY OF MIM OFFICE OF HEARING BOARDS PLANS P,E V PubPe woft ) EW zoring piank 0)3— 8" 1? 9 GAME AODM SUPPORT \ \ � D�N, MEN I \ � \ WOMEN SUPPORT III �� A � � � ` � �I VIII 2-R—S FOWER ,EABOVE SUN DECK BELOW SUPPORT x, BAUMAN DEVELOPMENT Sj ��. P2.� � x,03 RESIDENTS CLUB LEVEL LEVEL 1000 TMMMMM%=I 0 16 32 49 61 CITY GF oFFICE ol 11, a PARPS pLANS 11, FEM-1V Puble woft - Date zonirg -Date— planning 7 i sv 3 LEVELS 4100 THRU 4300 SE 1) 4800 TYPICAL PENTHOUSE LEVEL 0 16 32 48 64 WEST TOWER (PHASE 2) LEVELS 1100 THRU 4000 TYPICAL RESIDENTIAL LEVEL rtry r>�- rual.�etu OFFICE OF HEARING BOARDS PANS REVi _, Publ!c works - 6ate-J� 0 16 32 48 64 By, — �j 3 Q �9 Ki MATERIALS LEGEND LN J SMOOTH STUCCO FINISH OVER MASONRY SUBSTRATE PAINT FINISH. ACCENT COLORS AS INDICATED. (., II L2� IMPACT RESISTANT TINTED GLAZING IN LJ ALUMINUM FRAMING- 1-11 RAMING.l' N STORM PROOF, DRAINABLE ALUMINUM LOUVERS. LJALUMINUM RAILING ASSEMBLY. RAIL SHALL BE 42" ABOVE FINISH FLOOR AND RESIST A 4" OBJECT, 5] EXTERIOR LIGHT FIXTURE P6, POLISHED STONEWALL PANELS. 111 ROOFING MEMBRANE. 1 8 1 FLUID APPLIED BALCONY WATERPROOFING. F-91 DECORATIVE POOL DECK PAVERS OVER SECONDARY CONCRETE SLAB OVER d WATERPROOFING MEMBRANE OVER STRUCTURAL SLAB. 1� CEILING COFFERS AT COVERED LOGGIAS OF METAL STUDS CLAD WITH EXTERIOR 11 GRADEGYPSUM SHEATHING AND 1111 1111' SMOOTH CEMENT PLASTER FINISH. 11 ENTRY DRIVES AND LOGGIA WALKS OF BRICK PAVERS. co EAST ELEVATION `4] 0 . s, is :o' n' a N _ N } :8 METROPOLIS BAYSHORE d a �I. . s, is :o' n' a N METROPOLIS BAYSHORE '_' 11 11111 1111 1111' 1111 11111 11111 11111 __ -- 111■ 111♦ I I ! 11 11 11111 � 1111 11111 11 11 11111 11111 11111 l/ 11 11 11111 1111 11111 11111 11111 11111 III, 11 11111 1111' 1111 11111 1111.11111 11 11 11111 IIIA 11111 11 11' 11111 11111 1111 11 111 11111 1111 11111 i1 11111 1111 111111..:. -e. . -. - 11 11 11111 1111'''1111 1 II 1 111111 1111 1111 .. 11 1 11111 1111 11111 I .E.a 11 it 11111 1111 11111 11 11 11111 1111'11111 _ 11 1� 1111.1 1111. 11111 11 11 11111 11111 IINI 11 11 11111 1111 11111 ;!/ 11 11 11111 11111 11111 y 11 11 11111 INill 11 11 11111 1111'. VIII 11 11 11111 1111 11111 ; 11 11 11111 1111 '1111 11 11 11111 11111, '1111 ,r 1111 11 11111 1111 1111 ,_ E_ ,:g // Ili 11 11111 1111 !NII y ly 1111 11 111111 1111 1.1111 11' 11 1111!1 1111 '1111 111 11 1111111 1111 11111 / 11 11 11111 1111 11111 111 11 1111.,1 1111 1111 I 111 11 11111 1111 1111, ... 11 i 111111 1111 IIII a it 11 111111 1111 VIII 11 I1 11111 1111 11111 11 It �11111� III 1111 mom ■■ ■■ 1_�■! ■■ 111 11 U 1! �11 II �Illill 1■■� 111 ■■ 11 ■lte; NO 111111 �� _Ill�tll���.1 mlllllllq II nllllllli�� imiiill ■■I �■ ■�■ 11 '111 111' ■�■I ■■ 111 11 1L1 111��11���,� 11' n u I� � IIl�tll���ll 11 n 111 u �Illilh r! ■ ■ ons-1 11 11 111 loom ■ Q Il 1! 111 11 1! 111'' II I ! / ■■ ■■ ��� ■■ 111 11 1! 1! 111 !1 1! III II • � � � Doul I I / ! . s, is :o' n' a N METROPOLIS BAYSHORE BAY AND CITY VIEW CONDOMIMUM p , I,] MATERIALS LEGEND 7 SMOOTH STUCCO FINISH 1000 RECREATIONAL l OVER MASONRY SUBSTRATE PAINT FINISH. FACILITLES s ACCENT COLORS AS INDICATED. METROPOLIS BAYSHORE IPA IMPACT RESISTANT TINTED GLAZING IN m m I MEN ALUMINUM FRAMING. 0 1❑ L3] STORM PROOF, DRAINABLE ALUMINUM LOUVERS. ❑ ISQ ® ALUMINUM RAILING ASSEMBLY. Es' F4,3 RAIL SHALL BE 42" ABOVE FINISH DOE) WNW ® FLOOR AND RESIST A 4" OBJECT. N ' I EXTERIOR LIGHT FIXTURE 1:1 OU F61 POLISHED STONE WALL PANELS. mmmEE013mom L] ROOFING MEMBRANE. uuu LR_ FLUID APPLIED 300 LEVEL BALCONY WATERPROOFING. fel DECORATIVE POOL DECK PAVERS OVER - LJ SECONDARY CONCRETE SLAB OVER - WATERPROOFING MEMBRANE OVER _ W ,. STRUCTURAL SLAB. - `T 0 4 F"'"" _ 6 rf +1 k � '` iT I j -I I T j r -- ;4j JJ JL -11- I f L Lv -, r wwo+im 4-1mv- i mm - I 191 .. I,] SOUTH ELEVATION 'll I ul a HER m u ENCLOSURE c ROOFLEVEL 4800 LEVEL 9 4700 LEVEL 4600 LEVEL 4500 LEVEL 4400 LEVEL 4300 LEVEL 4200 LEVEL 4100 LEVEL - 4000 LEVEL 3900 LEVEL 3800 LEVEL 3700 LEVEL 3600 LEVEL 3500 LEVEL 3400 LEVEL 3300 LEVEL 3200 LEVEL 3100 LEVEL 3000 LEVEL 2900 LEVEL T 2800 LEVEL 2700 LEVEL g 2600 LEVEL 2500 LEVEL 2400 LEVEL 2300 LEVEL 2200 LEVEL 2100 LEVEL 2000 LEVEL 1900 LEVEL 1800 LEVEL 1700 LEVEL I600 LEVEL I S00 LEVEL 1400 LEVEL 1300 LEVEL 1200 LEVEL 1100 LEVEL Lq 1000 RECREATIONAL FACILITLES s METROPOLIS BAYSHORE IPA m m I MEN nom 0 1❑ - ❑ ISQ 700 LEVEL Es' F4,3 600 LEVEL DOE) WNW ® N ommmmmmmmil 1:1 OU m mmmEE013mom ® "3F uuu 300 LEVEL W ,. llffill IIIIII `T 0 4 SOUTH ELEVATION 'll I ul a HER m u ENCLOSURE c ROOFLEVEL 4800 LEVEL 9 4700 LEVEL 4600 LEVEL 4500 LEVEL 4400 LEVEL 4300 LEVEL 4200 LEVEL 4100 LEVEL - 4000 LEVEL 3900 LEVEL 3800 LEVEL 3700 LEVEL 3600 LEVEL 3500 LEVEL 3400 LEVEL 3300 LEVEL 3200 LEVEL 3100 LEVEL 3000 LEVEL 2900 LEVEL T 2800 LEVEL 2700 LEVEL g 2600 LEVEL 2500 LEVEL 2400 LEVEL 2300 LEVEL 2200 LEVEL 2100 LEVEL 2000 LEVEL 1900 LEVEL 1800 LEVEL 1700 LEVEL I600 LEVEL I S00 LEVEL 1400 LEVEL 1300 LEVEL 1200 LEVEL 1100 LEVEL 200 LOBBY ■n 0 S' 10' 2W 3V M' Se' a Lq 1000 RECREATIONAL FACILITLES s METROPOLIS BAYSHORE IPA 900 POOL DECK a 800 LEVEL nom 0 1❑ - ❑ ISQ 700 LEVEL _ BAY AND CITY VIEW CONDOMINIUMS ' 600 LEVEL DOE) 500 LEVEL g 1:1 OU m ® 400 LEVEL uuu 300 LEVEL 200 LOBBY ■n 0 S' 10' 2W 3V M' Se' a N METROPOLIS BAYSHORE IPA _ BAY AND CITY VIEW CONDOMINIUMS ' 111 'IN 7 MATERIALS LEGEND SMOOTH STUCCO FINISH FI -1 OVER MASONRY SUBSTRATE PAINT FINISH. ACCENT COLORS AS INDICATED. 2 IMPACT RESISTANT TINTED GLA7TNG IN -- ALUMINUM FRAMING. STORM PROOF, DRAINABLE ALUMINUM LOUVERS. 4] ALUMINUM RAILING ASSEMBLY, RAIL SHALL BE 42" ABOVE FINISH FLOOR AND RESIST A 4" OBJECT. [_5-I EXTERIOR LIGHT FIXTURE I J POLISHED STONE WALL PANELS. `1j] ROOFING MEMBRANE. �S FLUID APPLIED BALCONY WATERPROOFING. I� DECORATIVE POOL DECK PAVERS OVF,R[ ] SECONDARY CONCRETE SLAB OVER WATERPROOFING MEMBRANE OVER STRUCTURAL SLAB. I �p CEILING COFFERS AT COVERED LOGGIAS L OF METAL STUDS CLAD WITH EXTERIOR GRADEGYPSUM SHEATHING AND SMOOTH CEMENT PLASTFA FINISH. I �I� ENTRY DRIVES AND LOGGIA WALKS OF BRICK PAVERS. D P8 In 11 L-91 w 161 �� 1111 _ �� ���- ���• ���•. �� • tiSE mo � r It 1111 _ �� ���• ���• ���• �� Rim -OMNI nul 0 i ....:..1111_ WEST ELEVATION COOLING TOWER ENCLOSURE ROOFLEVEL 4000 LEVEL 3900 LEVEL 3800 LEVEL 3700 LEVEL 3600 LEVEL 3500 LEVEL 3400 LEVEL 3300 LEVEL 3200 LEVEL 3100 LEVEL 3000 LEVEL 2900 LEVEL 2800 LEVEL 2700 LEVEL 2600 LEVEL 2500 LEVEL 2400 LEVEL 2300 LEVEL 2200 LEVEL 2100 LEVEL 2000 LEVEL 1900 LEVEL 1800 LEVEL 1700 LEVEL 1600 LEVEL 1500 LEVEL 1400 LEVEL 1300 LEVEL Y 1200 LEVEL _1100 LEVEL 4 1000 RECREATIONAL " FACILITIES q 900 POOL DECK ~ 800 LEVEL ~ 700 LEVEL 600 LEVEL : -3 cn �'_` € '' E"' -•asp f_k c�.�- r 400 LEVEL METROPOLIS BAYSHORE 300 LEVEL 4 200 LOBBY _ N BAY AND CITY VIEW CONDOMINIUMS ' 11 L-91 w 161 �� 1111 _ �� ���- ���• ���•. �� • tiSE mo � r It 1111 _ �� ���• ���• ���• �� Rim -OMNI nul 0 i ....:..1111_ WEST ELEVATION COOLING TOWER ENCLOSURE ROOFLEVEL 4000 LEVEL 3900 LEVEL 3800 LEVEL 3700 LEVEL 3600 LEVEL 3500 LEVEL 3400 LEVEL 3300 LEVEL 3200 LEVEL 3100 LEVEL 3000 LEVEL 2900 LEVEL 2800 LEVEL 2700 LEVEL 2600 LEVEL 2500 LEVEL 2400 LEVEL 2300 LEVEL 2200 LEVEL 2100 LEVEL 2000 LEVEL 1900 LEVEL 1800 LEVEL 1700 LEVEL 1600 LEVEL 1500 LEVEL 1400 LEVEL 1300 LEVEL Y 1200 LEVEL _1100 LEVEL 4 1000 RECREATIONAL " FACILITIES q 900 POOL DECK ~ 800 LEVEL ~ 700 LEVEL 600 LEVEL N �'_` € '' E"' -•asp _ W c�.�- 400 LEVEL 11 L-91 w 161 �� 1111 _ �� ���- ���• ���•. �� • tiSE mo � r It 1111 _ �� ���• ���• ���• �� Rim -OMNI nul 0 i ....:..1111_ WEST ELEVATION COOLING TOWER ENCLOSURE ROOFLEVEL 4000 LEVEL 3900 LEVEL 3800 LEVEL 3700 LEVEL 3600 LEVEL 3500 LEVEL 3400 LEVEL 3300 LEVEL 3200 LEVEL 3100 LEVEL 3000 LEVEL 2900 LEVEL 2800 LEVEL 2700 LEVEL 2600 LEVEL 2500 LEVEL 2400 LEVEL 2300 LEVEL 2200 LEVEL 2100 LEVEL 2000 LEVEL 1900 LEVEL 1800 LEVEL 1700 LEVEL 1600 LEVEL 1500 LEVEL 1400 LEVEL 1300 LEVEL Y 1200 LEVEL _1100 LEVEL 4 1000 RECREATIONAL " FACILITIES q 900 POOL DECK ~ 800 LEVEL ~ 700 LEVEL 600 LEVEL 0 S IV 20' 30' 40' S0' a N 500 LEVEL o 400 LEVEL METROPOLIS BAYSHORE 300 LEVEL 4 200 LOBBY 0 S IV 20' 30' 40' S0' a N METROPOLIS BAYSHORE _ N BAY AND CITY VIEW CONDOMINIUMS ' cr 0-0 SECTION THROUGH EAST TOWER 0 5' 10- 26' 30' Ar 50' METROPOLIS BAYSHORE Eam BAY AND CITY VIEW CONDOMINIUMS LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lot 1, Lot 4, arid Lot 5 of 'Miramar, Addition to Miami; Flat Book 5, 0 OPEN SPACE / 'One square foot of open space or private recreation apace shall be Page 4 of the public records, MiamWade County, FL. RECREATION AREA provided for every 10 square feet of residential floor area., � PROPERTY AREA 116,184 square feet (gross) REQUIREMENTS 65,595 square feet (net) E OPEN SPACE Required: 83,852 SF (836,524 SF Area +10) PROPERTYZONING SOX 'Cenbal Commercial Residential District 83.805 SF 9,825 Exterior- Levels 100, 200 4.230 Roof Top Gordon- Level 4100 ALLOWABLE RESIDENTIAL Floor area for all residential uses shall rat exceed 89,750 Recreational Spaces 3 Pool Plaza Lv 900,1000 FLOOR AREA RATIO 720 times the gross lot area. 720 x 116,184.836,524.8 SF PARKING PROVISIONS 'For dwelling units there shall be a minimum of one parking apace and a maximum of two spaces.• ACTUAL RESIDENTIAL East Tower, Lofts: 523,942 SF 'For restaurants, bans, one per 100 SF net patron area' FLOOR AREA RATIO Went Tower, Lane: 309,817 SF 3,835+ 100.39 spaces 'For Low Areas: 2,765 SF Retail and Service oast, a minimum of one per 1,000 SF of groaa floor Total FAR. Area: 836,524 SF area and a maximum of one per 300 SF.' Actual Residential FAR.: 710 (836,524 ,116,184) 2,300 + 1000 = 3 spaces For business and professional office use, a minimum of one parking space per 800 SF.' ALLOWABLE2,335+800=3 Floor area for all non-residential uses shall rat exceed spaces NON-RESIDENTIAL 12 times the gross lot area. FLOOR AREA RATIO 12 x 116,184 =139,420 SF Parkins Provisions: UNITS SPACES (0u Space W Ln§ East Lob 54 54 ACTUAL Office 2,335 SF East Lofts 379 379 NON-RESIDENTWL Restaurant 3,835 SF Eat Tower/ PH 15 15 FLOOR AREA RATIO Retail 2,300 SF West Lob 30 30 Total FAR. Area: 8,470 SF West TOM 262 262 Actual Non-ReadenlialFAR.: 0.07 (e,470.116,184) West Tower/PH 12 12 Total Residential Spaces: 752 752 TOTAL The total floor area for all buildings oindividual lot a Retail and Service Spaces: 3 ALLOWABLE FAAND R. shall not exceed 8.4 times the gross lot area., r Office. 3 ACTUAL FAR. Actual Residential FAR.: 720 Restaurant S. paces:3g Actual Won Residentiel FAR.: 0.07 Total Actual FAR: Guest Spoon:es: 48 Total Available Parking (AI Levels) 845 727 Total Required Parking (AI Levels) 797 ALLOWABLE DENSITY 500 Units per Acre 1.506 Acres x 500 UnitalAcre = 752 Units Allowed REQUIRED ACCESSIBLE SPACES Required Accessible Parking Spaces 2%ofTotal NUMBER OF UNITS 752 Total (448 Phase 1;304 Phase 2) SPACES 2% of 845 - 17S Required Accessible Van Padang Spaces = 1 in every 8 SETBACKS/ 5' st Bayshore Drive and Northeast 4th Avenue 17+ 8 = 2 YARDS REQUIRED 0' at interior abutting property lime E PROVIDED ACCESSIBLE Provided Accessible Padang Spaces � SETBACKS/ 5' at Bayshare DrivePARKING SPACES 17 Provided Accessible Van Parking Spaces 3 YARDS PROVIDED T at Northeast 4th Vat alley 0' at interior abutting line LOFrAMM TYPO LEVELS 200 THRU SM A. I CO D F Q (6 Wi*) SF= 650 1,190 1,317 764 all 811 1,014 $is 1,122 JK L M TYPICAL LEVELS 1100 THRU 4100 A• C D, (31 k") F• Go H 1. SF= 1,246 764 569 773 836 1,175 786 834 858 1219 1,3611 TYPICAL LEVELS 4200 THRU 4300 At I I 9 C D' E F- 0- (2 b"b) - SF- 1,956 — 569 m Sm 1.175 786 j. 834 858 1,219 1,361 TMER -- , '— TYPICAL LEVELS 4400 THRU 4500 C D (2 Wvek) SF- 1,956 1,376 E, F- 1,175 786 834 858 1,219 1,361 4ST TOM PE14THOUSE LEVELS 4600 THRU 4800 :Phis Par P,w (3 Wiek) SF- 1,956 1,376 PHO 1,774 1,711 PHO 1,809 Luff MODEL TYPES LEVELS 200 TmRu 800 A B C' D* E Fl G (6 Wak) SF- J K L- M Nrr I a POREIR 1-218 1,139 1,102 713 963 I.— I LEVELS 1100 THRU 3300 (23 kvok) C 1) E F 0 H I J. SF= 939 1,010 W 908 451 729 SM 6% 920 906 EST TO LEVELS 3400 THRU 3700 A' a C D E F (4 bvds) SF= 1,847 1,010 899 908 4511 729 SM 1,579 nN"MUSEMODEL TYPES PENTHOUSE LEVELS 3800 TmRu 4000 PHit pfa. pm. P114. (3 W*) SF- 1,854 I'Mo 1,315 1.771 LEOEyO: t' in 3 bodrmm,