Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutR-03-0811J-03-520 7/17/03 -CCM RESOLUTION NO. 03— 1 1 A RESOLUTION OF THE MIAMI CITY COMMISSION, WITH ATTACHMENTS, APPROVING WITH CONDITIONS, A MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT PURSUANT TO ARTICLES 13 AND 17 OF ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 11000, FOR THE NEO VERTIKA PROJECT, TO BE LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY 690 SOUTHWEST 1ST AVENUE, MIAMI, FLORIDA, TO BE COMPRISED OF A MIXED-USE/RESIDENTIAL BUILDING WITH UP TO 443 UNITS, 24,000 SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL USE; RECREATIONAL AMENITIES AND 627 PARKING SPACES; DIRECTING TRANSMITTAL; MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATING CONCLUSIONS OF LAW; PROVIDING FOR BINDING EFFECT; CONTAINING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, on April 7, 2003, Vicky Garcia -Toledo, P.A. on behalf of Formack Realty Corporation, referred to as "APPLICANT"), submitted a complete Application for Major Use Special Permit for the Neo Vertika Project (referred to as "PROJECT") pursuant to Articles 13 and 17 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, for the property located at approximately 690 Southwest 1St Avenue, Miami, Florida, as legally described in "Exhibit B", attached and incorporated; and T T A C I 1 17%1 E 2"1 T !S". CITY COMMIM,Oi4 MEETING CIF esolution No. 03- 811 WHEREAS, development of the PROJECT requires the issuance of a Major Use Special Permit pursuant to Article 17 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended; and WHEREAS, the Large Scale Development Committee met on March 5, 2003, to consider the proposed PROJECT and offer its input; and WHEREAS, the Urban Development Review Board (DDRB) met on March 19, 2003, to consider the proposed PROJECT and recommended APPROVAL with one condition, that the three (3) floors facing 7th Street be habitable space --either for townhouse or commercial use; and WHEREAS, the APPLICANT has modified the proposed PROJECT to address the expressed technical concerns raised at said Large Scale Development Committee meeting and the design concerns of the UDRB; and WHEREAS, the Miami Planning Advisory Board, at its meeting held on May 21, 2003, Item No. 2, following an advertised public hearing, adopted Resolution No. PAD 23-03 by a vote of eight to zero (8-0), RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of the Major Use Special Permit Development Order as attached and incorporated; and WHEREAS, the City Commission deems it advisable and in the best interest of the general welfare of the City of Page 2 of 8 03- 811 Miami to issue a Major Use Special Permit Development Order as set forth; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. The recitals and findings contained in the Preamble to this Resolution are adopted by reference and incorporated as if fully set forth in this Section. Section 2. A Major Use Special Permit Development Order, attached and incorporated as "Exhibit A," is approved subject to the conditions specified in the Development Order, per Article 17 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, for the PROJECT to be developed by the APPLICANT, at approximately 690 Southwest 1St Avenue, Miami, Florida, more particularly described in "Exhibit B," attached and incorporated. Section 3. The PROJECT is approved for the construction of a mixed-use/residential building with up to 443 units, 24,000 square feet of commercial use; recreational amenities and 627 parking spaces. Section 4. The Major Use Special Permit Application for the PROJECT also encompasses the lower ranking Special Permits as set forth in the Development Order ("Exhibit A"). Page 3 of 8 03— 811 Section 5. The findings of fact set forth below are made with respect to the subject PROJECT: a. The PROJECT is in conformity with the adopted Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000, as amended. b. The PROJECT is in accord with the SD -7 Zoning classification of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended. C. Pursuant to Section 1305 of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, the specific site plan aspects of the PROJECT, i.e., ingress and egress, parking, signs and lighting, utilities, drainage, preservation of natural features and control of potentially adverse effects generally, have been considered and will be further considered administratively during the process of issuing a building permit and a certificate of occupancy. d. The PROJECT is expected to cost approximately $129 million, and to employ approximately 260 workers during construction (FTE -Full Time Employees); the PROJECT will also result in the creation of approximately 26 permanent new jobs. Page 4 of 8 The PROJECT will generate approximately $2 million annually in tax revenues to local units of government (2002 dollars). e. The City Commission further finds that: (1) the PROJECT will have a favorable impact on the economy of the City; (2) the PROJECT will efficiently use public transportation facilities; (3) any potentially adverse effects of the PROJECT will be mitigated through compliance with the conditions of this Major Use Special Permit; (4) the PROJECT will favorably affect the need for people to find adequate housing reasonably accessible to their places of employment; (5) the PROJECT will efficiently use necessary public facilities; (6) the PROJECT will not negatively impact the environment and natural resources of the City; (7) the PROJECT will not adversely affect living conditions in the neighborhood; Page 5 of 8 03- 811 (8) the PROJECT will not adversely affect public safety; (9) based on the record presented and evidence presented, the public welfare will be served by the PROJECT; and (10) any potentially adverse effects of the PROJECT arising from safety and security, fire protection and life safety, solid waste, heritage conservation, trees, shoreline development, minority participation and employment, and minority contractor/subcontractor participation will be mitigated through compliance with the conditions of this Major Use Special Permit. Section 6. This Major Use Special Permit, as approved and amended, shall be binding upon the APPLICANT and any successors in interest. Section 7. The application for Major Use Special Permit, which was submitted on April 7, 2003, and on file with the Department of Planning and Zoning of the City of Miami, Florida, shall be relied upon generally for administrative interpretations and is incorporated by reference. Page 6 of 8 03— — 811 Section 8. The City Manager is directed to instruct the Director of the Department of Planning and Zoning to transmit a copy of this Resolution and attachments to the developers: Vicky Garcia -Toledo, Esq. on behalf of Formack Realty Corporation. Section 9. The Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law are made with respect to the PROJECT as described in the Development Order ("Exhibit A") for the PROJECT, attached and incorporated. Section 10. The Major Use Special Permit Development Order for the PROJECT ("Exhibit A") is granted and issued. Section 11. In the event that any portion or section of this Resolution or the Development Order ("Exhibit A") is determined to be invalid, illegal, or unconstitutional by a court or agency of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall in no manner affect the remaining portions of this Resolution or Development Order ("Exhibit A") which shall remain in full force and effect. Section 12. The provisions approved for this Major Use Special Permit, as approved, shall commence and become operative thirty (30) days after the adoption of the Resolution. Page 7 of 8 Section 13. This Major Use Special Permit, as approved, shall expire two (2) years from its commencement and operative date. Section 14. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its adoption and signature of the Mayor.11 PASSED AND ADOPTED this 17th 2003. ATTEST ; PRISCILLA A. THO PSON CITY CLERK NDROwArI LARELLO ATTORNEY W7294:GKW:et day of July , M*UEL A. DIAZ, MAYOR CORRECTNESS:akw '-� If the Mayor does not sign this Resolution, it shall become effective at the end of ten calendar days from the date it was passed and adopted. If the Mayor vetoes this Resolution, it shall become effective immediately upon override of the veto by the City Commission. Page 8 of 8 0 13— 8 11 "EXHIBIT A" ATTACHMENT TO RESOLUTION NO. DATE: THE NEO VERTIKA PROJECT MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT DEVELOPMENT ORDER Let it be known that pursuant to Articles 13 and 17 of Ordinance No. 11000, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended (the "Zoning Ordinance"), the Commission of the City of Miami, Florida, has considered in a public hearing, the issuance of a Major Use Special Permit for the Neo Vertika Project (referred to as the "PROJECT") to be located at approximately 690 Southwest 1sT Avenue, Miami, Florida (see legal description in "Exhibit B," attached and incorporated), is subject to any dedications, limitations, restrictions, reservations or easements of record. After due consideration of the recommendations of the Planning Advisory Board and after due consideration of the consistency of this proposed development with the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan, the City Commission has approved the PROJECT, and subject to the following conditions approves the Major Use Special Permit and issues this Permit: FINDINGS OF FACT PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The proposed PROJECT is a residential/mixed-use development to be located at approximately 690 Southwest 1St Avenue, Miami, Florida. The PROJECT is located on a gross lot area of approximately 3. 91 acres and a net lot area of approximately 2.22 acres of land (more specifically described in "Exhibit B," incorporated by reference). The remainder of the PROJECT's Data Sheet is attached and incorporated as "Exhibit C". The proposed PROJECT will be comprised of a mixed- use/residential building with up to 443 units, 24,000 square feet of commercial use, recreational amenities and 627 parking spaces. The Major Use Special Permit Application for the PROJECT also encompasses the following lower ranking Special Permits: CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 906.6, to permit recreation facilities; Page A-2 of 9 03— 811 CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Section 915.2 for FAA clearance letter; CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 925.3.8, to allow development/construction signage; CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 918.2 for parking and staging of construction during construction; CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, for construction fence and construction trailer with watchman's quarters; CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT for valet parking for residential and other uses; CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9 for reduction in required backup dimension for offstreet loading; CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 15, for reduction of periphery landscape. CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 15, for reduction of loading berth size. CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 6, Section 607 for new construction in the SD -7 District. CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 6, Section 607 for temporary construction fence within the SD -7 District. CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 15 for any development on property adjacent to the Miami River. Page A-3 of 9 �3- 81.1 REQUEST that the following MUSP conditions be required at the time of shell permit instead of at issuance of foundation permit: a. the requirement to provide a letter of assurance for the Solid Waste Department; and b. the requirement to record in the Public Records a unity of title or covenant in lieu of unity of title. Pursuant to Articles 13 and 17 of the Zoning Ordinance, approval of the requested Major Use Special Permit shall be considered sufficient for the subordinate permits requested and referenced above as well as any other special approvals required by the City which may be required to carry out the requested plans. The PROJECT shall be constructed substantially in accordance with plans and design schematics on file prepared by Revuelta, Vega, Leon P.A., dated March 2003; the landscape plan shall be implemented substantially in accordance with plans and design schematics on file prepared by Alex Knight & Associates, dated March 2003; said design and landscape plans may be permitted to be modified only to the extent necessary to comply with the conditions for approval imposed; all modifications shall be subject to the review and approval of the Director of the Page A-4 of 9 03- 811 Department of Planning and Zoning prior to the issuance of any building permits. The PROJECT conforms to the requirements of the SD -7 Zoning District, as contained in Ordinance No. 11000, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended. The existing comprehensive plan future land use designation on the subject property allows the proposed uses. CONDITIONS THE APPLICANT, ITS SUCCESSORS, AND/OR ASSIGNS, JOINTLY OR SEVERALLY, PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF ANY BUILDING PERMITS, SHALL COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING: 1. Meet all applicable building codes, land development regulations, ordinances and other laws. 2. Pay all applicable fees due prior to the issuance of a building permit; including a contribution of $94,080.35 to the City's Affordable Housing Trust Fund. 3. Allow the Miami Police Department to conduct a security survey, at the option of the Department, and to make recommendations concerning security measures and systems; further submit a report to the Department of Planning and Zoning, prior to commencement of construction, demonstrating how the Police Department recommendations, if any, have been incorporated into the PROJECT security and construction plans, or demonstrate to the Director of the Department of Page A-5 of 9 U Planning and Zoning why such recommendations are impractical. 4. Obtain approval from, or provide a letter from the Department of Fire -Rescue indicating APPLICANT'S coordination with members of the Fire Plan Review Section at the Department of Fire -Rescue in the review of the scope of the PROJECT, owner responsibility, building development process and review procedures, as well as specific requirements for fire protection and life safety systems, egress, vehicular access and water supply. 5. Obtain approval from, or provide a letter of assurance from the Department of Solid Waste that the PROJECT has addressed all concerns of the said Department prior to the obtainment of a shell permit. 6. Comply with the Minority Participation and Employment Plan (including a Contractor/subcontractor Participation Plan) submitted to the City as part of the Application for Development Approval, with the understanding that the APPLICANT must use its best efforts to follow the provisions of the City's Minority/Women Business Affairs and Procurement Program as a guide. 7. Prior to the issuance of a shell permit, provide the City with an executed, recordable unity of title or covenant in -lieu of unity of title agreement for the subject property; said agreement shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Attorney's Office. 8. Provide the Department of Planning and Zoning with a temporary construction plan that includes the following: a temporary construction parking plan, with an enforcement policy; a construction noise management Page A-6 of 9 plan with an enforcement policy; and a maintenance plan for the temporary construction site; said plan shall be subject to the review and approval by the Department of Planning and Zoning prior to the issuance of any building permits and shall be enforced during construction activity. All construction activity shall remain in full compliance with the provisions of the submitted construction plan; failure to comply may lead to a suspension or revocation of this Major Use Special Permit. THE CITY SHALL: Establish the operative date of this Permit as being thirty (30) days from the date of its issuance; the issuance date shall constitute the commencement of the thirty (30) day period to appeal from the provisions of the Permit. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW The PROJECT, proposed by the APPLICANT, complies with the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000, is consistent with the orderly development and goals of the City of Miami, and complies with local land development regulations and further, pursuant to Section 1703 of the Zoning Ordinance: (1) the PROJECT will have a favorable impact on the economy of the City; and Page A-7 of 9 (2) the PROJECT will efficiently use public transportation facilities; and (3) the PROJECT will favorably affect the need for people to find adequate housing reasonably accessible to their places of employment; and (4) the PROJECT will efficiently use necessary public facilities; and (5) the PROJECT will not negatively impact the environment and natural resources of the City; and (6) the PROJECT will not adversely affect public safety; and (7 ) the public welfare will be served by the PROJECT; and (8) any potentially adverse effects of the PROJECT will be mitigated through conditions of this Major Use Special Permit. The proposed development does not unreasonably interfere with the achievement of the objectives of the adopted State Land Development Plan applicable to the City of Miami. Pursuant to Section 1305 of the Zoning Ordinance, the specific site plan aspects of the PROJECT i.e., ingress and egress, offstreet parking and loading, refuse and service areas, signs and lighting, utilities, drainage and control of potentially adverse effects generally have been considered and will be further considered administratively Page A-8 of 9 03- 0011 during the process of issuing individual building permits and certificates of occupancy. Page A-9 of 9 03— 811 EXHIBIT "B" Legal Description: Lots 1 thru 5 and the Easterly 250.00 feet of Tract "A", Block 39S, and Lots 16,17, 20, and 21, Block 39S, of Amended Plat of Block 39 South, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat book 42, at Page 6, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida, and the East 100.00 feet of Lots 18 and 19, Block 39S, City of Miami, according to the plat thereof recorded in plat Book B at Page 41, of the Public records of Miami -Dade County, Florida; and all of that portion of land lying North of said East 250 feet of Tract "A" to the Miami River as it now exists; said portion also included in legal description shown in Warranty Deed recorded in OR Book 5788, Page 34, dated 20 November, 1967. \75412\18112\ # 612877 v 5 21 3/31/03 2:59 PM 0.3-- sit Site Location/Address CJ With Frontage of Approximately: 250 feet on SW 7 Street 250 feet on Miami River 3 8 5 Feet on 1St Avenue Leal Description: EXHIBIT "C" NEO VERTIKA a mixed use project PROJECT DATA: St Avenue. Miami. Florida Lots 1 thru 5 and the Easterly 250.00 feet of Tract "A", Block 39S, and Lots 16, 17, 20, and 21, Block 39S, of Amended Plat of Block 39 South, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat book 42, at Page 6, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida, and the East 100.00 feet of Lots 18 and 19, Block 39S, City of Miami, according to the plat thereof recorded in plat Book B at Page 41, of the Public records of Miami -Dade County, Florida; and all of that portion of land lying North of said East 250 feet of Tract "A" to the Miami River as it now exists; said portion also included in legal description shown in Warranty Deed recorded in OR Book 5788, Page 34, dated 20 November, 1967. Site Data Zoning District SD-7(Central Brickell Rapid Transit Commercial -Residential District) Flood Zone Flood Zone "VE" (EL 9.00 N.G.V.D.) Density 200 Units / Acre = 444 Units Max. Site Area in Square Ft. 96,653 S.F. Site Area Acres 2.22 Acres Lot Area Total Net Lot Area Center Line of 1" Avenue Center Line of 7th Street River (90'- 0') Public Transport (90'-0') TOTAL ADDITIONAL AREA TOTAL GROSS LOT AREA = 96,653 S.F. 9,728 S.F. 6,243 S.F. = 22,380 S.F. 35,328 S.F. 73,868 S.F. 170,521 S.F. F.A.R. Allowed: 170,521 S.F. X 6.0 (Residential) _ Allowed: 170,521 S.F. X 2.25 (Commercial) _ MAX F.A.R. _ ( 2.22 Acres) (3.91 Acres) 1,023,126 SF 383,672 SF 1,406,796 SF 03- 81.1 -N SETBACKS FRONT REQUIRED PROVIDED PEDESTAL: 15'-0" 15' TOWER: 15'-0" 106'-0" REAR PEDESTAL: (As per Charter) 50'-0" 50'-9" (Nearest Point to PL) TOWER: (As per Charter) 50'-0" 50'-9" (Nearest Point to PL) SIDES PEDESTAL EAST: (Asper Charter) 30'-6" 30'-6" (View Corridor) PEDESTAL WEST: (As per Charter) 32'-0" 32'-0" (View Corridor) TOWER EAST: (As per Charter) 30'-6" 30"-6" (View Corridor) TOWER WEST: (As per Charter) 32'-0" 35'- 3" (View Corridor) BUILDING HEIGHT MAX PROVIDED Unlimited 371'-4" N.G.V.D. NUMBER OF STORIES 33 Stories HEIGHT ABOVE MAIN ROOF: 29'-6" PARKING DATA REQUIRED PARKING 443 UNITS X 10 SPACES / UNITS = 443 SPACES COMMERCIAL SPACES = 19 SPACES TOTAL REQUIRED = 462 SPACES PROVIDED PARKING LEVEL 1 = 28 SPACES LEVEL 2 = 97 SPACES LEVEL 3 = 112 SPACES LEVEL 4 = 117 SPACES LEVEL 5 = 117 SPACES LEVEL 6 = 104 SPACES TOTAL = 575 SPACES (12 HANDICAP SPACES) LOADING (BASED ON 872,224 S.F. GROSS AREA) REQUIRED = (4) 12 X 35 and (1) 12 X 55 PROVIDED = (6) 12x35 I.1 PLANNING FACT SHEET HEARING DATE REQUEST/LOCATION LEGAL DESCRIPTION PETITION PLANNING RECOMMENDATION BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD CITY COMMISSION APPLICATION NUMBER ITEM PZ 1 Vicky Garcia -Toledo, Esq. on behalf of Fomack Realty Corporation May 21, 2003 Major Use Special Permit for the Neo Vertika Project located at approximately 690 SW 13t Avenue. Complete legal description on file at the Department of Hearing Boards. Consideration of a resolution, approving with conditions, a Major Use Special Permit pursuant to Articles 13 and 17 of Zoning Ordinance No. 11000, as amended, for The Neo Vertika Project, to be located at approximately 690 SW 1st Avenue, Miami, Florida, to be comprised of a mixed-use/residential building with up to 443 units, 24,000 square feet of commercial use; recreational amenities and 575 parking spaces. Approval with conditions. See supporting documentation. Recommended approval with VOTE: 8-0 conditions to City Commission. N/A. 2003-016 Item #2 CITY OF MIAMI - PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT 444 SW 2ND AVENUE, 3RD FLOOR - MIAMI, FLORIDA, 33130 PHONE (305) 416-1400 Date: 6/18/2003 Page 1 03- 811 Analysis for Major Use Special Permit for the Neo Vertika Project located at approximately 690 SW 1t Avenue. CASE NO. 2003-0016 Pursuant to Ordinance 11000, as amended, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, the subject proposal for the Neo Vertika Project has been reviewed to allow a Major Use Special Permit per Article 17 for a mixed-use/residential building with up to 443 units, 24,000 square feet of commercial use; recreational amenities and 575 parking spaces. This Permit also includes the following requests: CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 906.6, to permit recreation facilities; CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Section 915.2 for FAA clearance letter; CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 925.3.8, to allow develop- ment/construction signage; CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 918.2 for parking and stag- ing of construction during construction; CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, for construction fence and con- struction trailer with watchman's quarters; CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT for valet parking for residential and other uses; CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9 for reduction in required backup dimension for offstreet loading; CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 15, for reduction of periphery land- scape. CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 15, for reduction of loading berth. size. CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 6, Section 607 for new construction in the SD -7 District. CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 6, Section 607 for temporary con- struction fence within the SD -7 District. CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 15 for any development on property adjacent to the Miami River. REQUEST that the following MUSP conditions be required at the time of shell permit instead of at issuance of foundation permit: a. the requirement to provide a letter of assurance for the Solid Waste Department; and 03- 811 b. the requirement to record in the Public Records a unity of title or covenant in lieu of unity of title. Pursuant to Articles 13 and 17 of Zoning Ordinance 11000, approval of the requested Major Use Special Permit shall be considered sufficient for the subordinate permits requested and referenced above as well as any other special approvals required by the City which may be required to carry out the requested plans. In determining the appropriateness of the proposed project, the Planning and Zoning Department has referred this project to the Large Scale Development Committee (LSDQ and the Urban Development Review Board (UDRB) for additional input and recommendations; the following findings have been made: • It is found that the proposed development project will benefit the area by creating new housing opportunities in the Brickell Area with ground floor commercial uses. • It is found that the subject property is located along the Miami River in the Brickell Area of downtown, which makes it ideal for creating new in -town housing to serve the downtown area. • It is found that the project has convenient access to the People Mover for efficient use of existing mass transit systems. • It is found that the project was reviewed by the Large Scale Development Committee and has been modified to address the expressed technical concerns raised at said Large Scale Development Committee meeting; • It is found that the proposed project was reviewed for design appropriateness by the Urban Development Review Board and the Planning and Zoning Department; the staff review resulted in design modifications which were then recommended for approval to the Planning and Zoning Director. • It is found that with respect to all additional criteria as specified in Section 1305 of Zoning Ordinance 11000, the proposal has been reviewed and found to be adequate. Based on these findings, the Planning and Zoning Department is recommending approval of the requested Development Project with the following conditions: 1. Meet all applicable building codes, land development regulations, ordinances and other laws. 2. Pay all applicable fees due prior to the issuance of a building permit. 3. Allow the Miami Police Department to conduct a security survey, at the option of the Department, and to make recommendations concerning security measures and systems; further submit a report to the Department of Planning and Zoning,prior to commencement of construction, demonstrating how the Police Department rec- ommendations, if any, have been incorporated into the PROJECT security and construction plans,. or demonstrate to the Director of the Department of Planning and Zoning why such recommendations are impractical. 4. Obtain approval from, or provide a letter from the Department of Fire -Rescue in- dicating. APPLICANT'S coordination with members of the Fire Plan Review Sec- tion at the Department of Fire -Rescue in the review of the scope of the PROJECT, owner responsibility, building development process and review procedures, as well as specific requirements for fire protection and life safety systems, exiting, vehicular access and water supply. 5. Obtain approval from, or provide a letter of assurance from the Department of Solid Waste that the PROJECT has addressed all concerns of the said Department prior to the obtainment of a shell permit. 6. Comply with the Minority Participation and Employment Plan (including a Con- tractor/Subcontractor Participation Plan) submitted to the City as part of the Ap- plication for Development Approval, with the understanding that the APPLICANT must use its best efforts to follow the provisions of the City's Mi- nority/Women Business Affairs and Procurement Program as a guide. 7. Prior to the issuance of a shell permit, provide the City with an executed, record- able unity of title or covenant in -lieu of unity of title agreement for the subject property; said agreement shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Attorney's Office. 8. Provide the Department of Planning and Zoning with a temporary construction plan that includes the following: a temporary construction parking plan, with an enforcement policy; a construction noise management plan with an enforcement policy; and a maintenance plan for the temporary construction site; said plan shall be subject to the review and approval by the Department of Planning and Zoning prior to the issuance of any building permits and shall be enforced during con- struction activity. All construction activity shall remain in full compliance with the provisions of the submitted construction plan; failure to comply may lead to a suspension or revocation of this Major Use Special Permit. 03- 811 74 3 z. LU • :� A. :2 :.a f s tt a Q S.W. if K vs a, •� : w e r s e• a •.o C I T Y :: .• r s , , f i j "$ 3 20 as \v' a •s s �a .• s 30 ill 74 3 z. LU • :� A. :2 :.a f s tt a Q S.W. if K vs a, •� : w e r s e• a •.o C I T Y :: .• r s , , f i j "$ 3 20 as \v' a •s s �a .• y' r. V +. „� x ; ,. .. F „� _,' i p: j - �� ._ � kd ... :. .r �. ,u 2 , f �: # ° _ _'._ 'W � n - ,_ .. � _. ., � ... .... RESOLUTION PAB - 23-03 A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION, APPROVING WITH CONDITIONS, A MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT, PURSUANT TO ARTICLES 13 AND 17 OF ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 11000, AS AMENDED, FOR THE NEO VERTIKA PROJECT, TO BE LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY 690 SOUTHWEST 1ST AVENUE, MIAMI, FLORIDA, TO BE COMPRISED OF A MIXED- USE/RESIDENTIAL BUILDING WITH UP TO 443 UNITS, 24,000 SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL USE, RECREATIONAL AMENITIES AND 575 PARKING SPACES. HEARING DATE: May 21, 2003 ITEM NO.: 2 VOTE: 8-0 ATTEST://cx'ej'w/A/. elabe - anchez, Di or Planning and Zoning Department 03_ 81, Policy Committee: Governor of State of Florida Miami River Commission Mr. Jeb Bush Designee: Dr. Pamella Dana Chair of Miami -Dade Delegation ! c/o Rosenstiel School Senator Kendrick Meek 4600 Rickenbacker Causeway Designee: Ms. Debra Owens Miami, Florida 33149 Chair of Governing Board of Office: (305) 3614850 South Florida Water Management Fax: (305) 361-4755 District Ms. Trudi K. Williams email: mrc@rsmas.miami.edu Designee: Mr. Gerardo Fernandez Miami -Dade State Attorney May 21, 2003 Ms. Katherine Fernandez -Rundle Designee: Mr. Gary Winston City of Miami Planning Advisory Board Members Mayor of Miami -Dade County Alex Penelas City Hall Mayor Designee: Ms. Sandy O'Neil 3500 Pan American Drive Mayor of Miami Miami, FL 33133 Mayor Manuel A. Diaz Designee: Mr. Javier Fernandez City of Miami Commissioner Re: Recommendation for Approval of Neo Vertika Major Use Commissioner Ice Sanchez Special Permit Designee: Ms. Eileen Damaso Miami -Dade County Commissioner Dear City of Miami Planning Advisory Board Members: Commissioner Bruno Barreiro Designee: Mr. Alfredo Gonzalez The Miami River Commission (MRC) respectfully recommends the Chair Group f Miami River Marine planning Advisory Board concur with the City of Miami Planning Mr. Jim Brown t tarmenand MRC's advisory recommendation that the Department ry City Designee: Mr. Richard Bunnell Commission approve the Major Use Special Permit (MUSP) for Neo Chair of Marine Council Mr. Phil Everingham Vertika, located on the Miami River's south shore at 690 SW 1St Ave. Designee: Mr. James Wellington The Neo Vertika MUSP is compatible with the "Miami River Corridor Executive Director of Downtown Urban Infill Plan", as it provides new residential development with a DeveloMs. Patti Allen ment Authority retail ground floor in the downtown "lower river" section. In addition, Designee: Mr. Alonso Menendez the Neo Vertika MUSP is compatible with the Miami River Greenway Chair of Greater Miami Chamber Action Plan, in providing the required 50 -foot setback from the River, of Commerce Mr. William o. Cullom with retail and restaurants connecting to a publicly accessible Designee: Ms. Megan Kelly riverwalk. Neighborhood Representative Appointed by City of Miami Commission In order to optimize the benefits of the NEO Vertika project, the MRC Dr. Ernest Martin Designee: Mr. Michael Cox recommended the following to the developer: Neighborhood Representative - Coordinate with FPL to continue the riverwalk to the east of Neo Appointed by Miami -Dade Vertika Commission Ms. Sallye Jude ■ Coordinate with Kevin Riley, property owner on the project's Designee: Ms. Jane Caporelli western boundary, to continue the riverwalk to the west of Neo Representative from Vertika Environmental or Civic organization Appointed by the ■ Work with the western adjacent property owner to keep a small Governor Ms. Janet McAliley portion of the existing boat slip for a future water taxi stop Designee: Ms. Theo Long Member at Large Appointed by the Governor tfully, Mr. Robert Parks Member at Large Appointed by 4Robert Miami -Dade Commission Ms. Sara Babun Designee: Mr. Tom Parker L. Par , Member at Large Appointed by Chair, City of Miami Comnnss,oa Mr. Cleve Sones, Jr. Miami River Commission Designee: Captain Beau Payne Managing Director -- Captain David Miller PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT HEARING BOARDS DIVISION 444 SW 2"d Avenue, 79' Floor • Miami, Florida 33130 Telephone 305-416-1480 • Fax 305-416-2035 APPLICATION FOR MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT IT IS INTENDED THAT MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMITS BE REQUIRED WHERE SPECIFIED USES AND/OR OCCUPANCIES INVOLVE MATTERS DEEMED TO BE OF CITYWIDE OR AREA -WIDE IMPORTANCE THE CITY COMMISSION SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR DETERMINATIONS ON APPLICATIONS FOR MAJOR USESPECIAL PERMITS. (SEE ARTICLE 17 OF ORDINANCE 11000, AS AMENDED, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CIT y OF MIAMI, FLORIDA.) THE DIRECTOR OF THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING SHALL MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS ON ALL APPLICATIONS FOR MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMITS AND FOR ANY AMENDMENTS THERETO AND SHALL TRANSMIT SAID APPLICATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD FOR ITS RECOMMENDATIONS AND MAY MAKE REFERRALS TO OTHER AGENCIES, BODIES, OR OFFICERS FOR REVIEW, ANALYSIS, AND/OR TECHNICAL FINDINGS AND DETERMINATIONS AND REPORTS THEREON. (SEE SECTION 1301.4 OF ORDINANCE 11000, AS AMENDED, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA) ANY PERSON WHO RECEIVES COMPENSATION, REMUNERATION OR EXPENSES FOR CONDUCTING LOBBYING ACTIVITIES TO REGISTER AS A LOBBYIST WITH THE CITY CLERK, PRIOR TO ENGAGING IN LOBBYING ACTIVITIES BEFORE CITY STAFF, BOARDS, COMMITTEES AND THE CITY COMMISSION. A COPY OF SAID ORDINANCE IS AVAILABLE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK (MIAMI CrrY HALL), LOCATED AT 3500 PAN AMERICAN DRIVE, MIAMI, FLORIDA, 33133. APPLICANTS ARE RESPONSIBLE, IF/NEEDED, TO BRING AN INTERPRETER FOR THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE TO ANY PRESSlTATION BEFORE CITY BOARDS, COMMITTEES AND THE CITY COMMISSION. POWER OF ATTORNEY WILL BE REQUIRED IF NEITHER APPLICANT OR LEGAL COUNSEL REPRESENTING THE,APPLICANT EXECUTE THE APPLICATION OR DESIRE TO MAKE A PRESENTATION BEFORE CITY BOARDS, COMMITTEES AND THE CITY COMMISSION. I, Teresa Storer, as SecretaryfTreasurer of Fomack Realty Corporation hereby apply to the Director of the Punning and Zoning Department of the City of Miami for approval of a Major Use Special Permit under the provisions of Article 17 of the City of Miami Zoning Ordinance. Property Address: 690 SW 1sT Court. Miami FL 33130 Nature of proposed use (be specific): Residential/Commercial Mixed Use 1. Two 11x17' original surveys and one WNW" original survey, prepared by a State of Florida Registered Land Surveyor within one year from the date of application. 2. Two 11x17' original plans and one 30'x42' original plan, signed and sealed by a State of Florida Registered Architect or Engineer showing property boundaries, existing (if any) and proposed structure(s), parking, landscaping, etc.; building elevations and dimensions and computations of lot area and building spacing. 3. Plans need to be stamped by the Hearing Boards Division first and then signed by Public Works, Zoning and Planning prior to submission of application. 4. Affidavit and disclosure of ownership of subject property and disclosure of interest (see attached forms). 5. Certified list of owners of real estate within a 500 -feet radius from the outside boundary of property (see pages 5 and 6). 1754121181121 1612877 v 5 4 3f27I03 5:35 PM 6. At least two photographs that shy .he entire property (land and improvements; 7. Maps showing the existing zoning designation and the adopted comprehensive plan designation for areas on and _ around the property. 8. General location map showing relation to the site or activity to major streets, schools, existing utilities, shopping areas, important physical features in and adjoining the project, and the like. 9. Concept Plan: a) Site plan and relevant information per Section 1304.2.1d -h in Zoning Ordinance 11000, as amended. b) Relationships to surrounding existing and proposed uses and activities, systems and facilities, per Section 1702.2.2a in Zoning Ordinance 11000, as amended. c) How concept affects existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan principles and designations; tabulation of any required variances, special permits, changes of zoning or exemptions, per Section 1702.2.2b in Zoning Ordinance 11000, as amended. 10. Developmental Impact Study (an application for development approval for a Development of Regional Impact may substitute). 11. Other (specify and attach cover letter explaining why any document you are attaching is pertinent to this application). 12. An 8 %Z x 11' copy of all exhibits that will be presented at the hearing. 13. Twenty-five (25) "Major Use Special Permit" books containing the above information. If this project requires Zoning Board approval, a total of thirty-five (35) books will be required. 14. Cost of processing according to the City,Code: a) S , for the Major Use Special Permit b) Additional fee of $---____, for any required special permits, changes of zoning or variances. c) Total Fee: $ 17. What is the purpose of this Major Use Special Permit? A residential tower and aucillary retail/commercial space Signature Name:Teresa Storer. Secretaryfrreasurer, Fomack Realty Corporation 17541211811218 612877 v 5 3/27/03 5:35 PM Address 11 Grove Avenue Branford, Connecticut 06405 Telephone 203-488-0771 _ Date ! �'F- S E STATE OF CONNECTICUT COUNTY OF NEW HAVEN The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 04? day of , 2003, by Teresa Storer, Secretary/Treasurer of Fomack Realty Corporation, on behalf of the corporation. She is er known to me or who has produced as identification and she did (did not) take an oath. VW= IL ALEXANDER Notary (Public My Commission Expires 2/28/2304 (Stamp) STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2003, by of a corporation, on behalf of the corporation. He/She is personally known to me or has produced as identification and who did (did not) take an oath. (imp) Signature STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2003, by partner (or agent) on behalf of a partnership. He/She is personally known to me or who has produced as identification and who did (did not) take an oath. (Stamp) 17S412UMA# 612877 v 5 327/03 5:35 PM Signature _ NEO VERTIKA a mixed use project APPLICATION FOR MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT Note 1. Request for A Major Use Special Permit To: a) A residential project of more than 200 units. b) A parking garage of more than 500 spaces. Note 2. Request for a Class II Special Permit To: a) Permit a waiver of Parking Guides and Standards for: 1) distance requirement from parking space to column or wall; 2) back up space/distance. b) Reduction of loading berths. Note 3. a) Class I Special Permit to permit permanent recreation facilities. b) Class I Special Permit to permit the staging and parking during construction. C) Class I Special Permit to allow development/construction/and signage. d) Class I Special Permit to allow construction fence/construction trailer. e) Class I Special Permit to allow valet parking service. 03-- 811 Note 4. To request from the City Commission: a) a waiver from the noise ordinance during the required concrete pours for construction of the project. Note 5. To apply for a Certificate of Appropriateness for ground disturbing activities, if needed. Note 6. To apply for all lesser permits as may be required to allow development and construction of this phase project as contemplated under this Major Use Special Permit application as submitted and as per plans on file. Note 7. The above Major Use Special Permit is to encompass all lower ranking special permits necessary to complete the projects as per plans under Tab 6. t)3- 81t AFFIDAVIT STATE OF CONNECTICUT } }SS COUNTY OF NEW HAVEN } Before me, the undersigned authority, this day personally appeared Teresa. Storer, Secretary/Treasurer of Fomack Realty Corporation, who being. by me first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and says: 1. That he/she is the owner, or the legal representative of the owner, submitting the accompanying application for a public hearing as required by the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, affecting the real property located in the City of Miami, as described and listed on the pages attached to this Affidavit and made a part thereof. 2. That all owners which he/she represents, if any, have given their full and complete permission for him/her to act in his/her behalf for the street closure as set out in the accompanying petition, X including responding to day to day staff ihquiries,_ not including responding to day to day staff inquiries in which case he/she should be contacted at 213-488-0771. 3. That the foregoing pages -are made a part of this affidavit contain the current names, mailing addresses, telephone numbers and legal descriptions for the real property of which he/she is the owner or legal representative. 4. The facts as represented in the application and documents submitted in conjunction with this affidavit are true and correct. Further Affiant sayeth not Teresa Storer, Secretary/Treasurer of Fomack Realty Corporation STATE OF CONNECTICUT COUNTY OF NEW HAVEN The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this Z by Teresa Storer, Secretary/Treasurer of Fomack Realty Corporation, on e�rsonally I or has produced Identification and sh did did not) take an oath. \75412\18112\# 612877 v 5 3/27/03 5:35 PM day of 2003, ilf of the corporation. She is as Name: Notary Public -State of Connecticut Commission No.: My Commission Expires: 9 VIOMILALMUMER My O=MbWOnn EXP bk llIT99 W8/2004 03- 811 DISCLOSURE OF OWNERSHIP Legal description subject real property: See attached Exhibit A. Street Address: 690 SW 1 Court, Miami, FL 33130 2. Owner(s) of subject real Property and percentage of ownership. Note: Section 2-618 of the Code of the City of Miami requires disclosure of all parties having a financial interest, either direct or indirect in the subject matter of a presentation, request or petition to the City Commission. Accordingly, question #2 requires disclosure of shareholders of corporations, beneficiaries of trusts, and/or any other interested parties, together with their addresses and proportionate interest. Fomack Realty Corporation: Teresa B. Storer -11 Grove Avenue, Branford, CT, 06405 20% Bruce L. Brown - 402 N.E. 95h Street, Miami Shores, FL 33138 20% Donna B. Dolan - 4828 S. Hemingway Circle, Margate, FL 33063 20% Dorothy D. Brown -1560 N.E. 105 Street, Miami Shores, FL 33138 20% J. Webster Brown - 23330 Water Circle, Boca Raton, FL 33480 20% 3. Legal description and street address of any real property (a) owned by any party listed in answer to question #2, and (b) located within 500 feet of the subject real property. 1� Teresa Storer, Secretary/Treasurer STATE OF CONNECTICUT COUNTY OF NEW HAVEN The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this Z,? day of 2003, by Teresa �tnr�Secretary/Treasurer of Fomack Realty Corporation, on behalf of the corporation. She is personally known to me or has produced - - --- - as identification and'.'she di (did not) take an oath. l _ Name: Notarylic- tate of Connecticut Commission No.: My Commission Expires: 1754121181121 9 612877 v 5 10 3/27/03 535 PM V10M R ALEXANDER NOW Public my Commission Expires V22112-- OWNER'S LIST Owner's Name: Fomack Realty Corporation Mailing Address: 11 Grove Avenue, Branford, Connecticut 06405 Telephone Number: (203) 488-0771 Legal Description: Legal description of subject real property — See attached Exhibit A Street Address: 690 SW 1 Avenue, Miami, FL 33130 Owner's Name: Mailing Address: Telephone Number: Legal Description: Owner's Name: N/A Mailing Address: Telephone Number: Legal Description: Any other real estate property owned individually, jointly or severally (by corporation, partnership or privately) within 500 feet of the subject site is listed as follows: Street Address Folio Number: N/A Legal Description N/A 03- 811 EXHIBIT A Legal Description: Lots 1 thru 5 and the Easterly 250.00 feet of Tract "A", Block 395, and Lots 16, 17, 20, and 21, Block 39S, of Amended Plat of Block 39 South, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat book 42, at Page 6, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida, and the East 100.00 feet of Lots 18 and 19, Block 39S, City of Miami, according to the plat thereof recorded in plat Book B at Page 41, of the Public records of Miami -Dade County, Florida; and all of that portion of land lying North of said East 250 feet of Tract "A" to the Miami River as it now exists; said portion also included in legal description shown in Warranty Deed recorded in OR Book 5788, Page 34, dated 20 November, 1967. \75412\18112\ # 612877 v 5 21 3/31/03 2:59 PM BILZIN SUMBERG BAENA PRICE & AXELROD LLP A PARTNERSHIP OF PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS 200 SOUTH BISCAYNE BOULEVARD, SUITE 2500 • MIAMI, FLORIDA 33131-5340 TELEPHONE: (305) 374-7580 • FAX: (305) 374-7593 E-MAIL: INFOOBILZIN.COM • WWW.BILZIN.COM Dicky Garcia -Toledo, P.A. Direct Dial: (305) 350-2409 Direct Fax. (305) 351-2233 E -Mail. vleiva@bilzimcom April 11, 2003 Ms. Maria Faria City of Miami, Hearing Boards Section 444 SW 2nd Avenue, 7th Flr. Miami, Florida 33130 Re: Neo Vertika MUSP Dear Maria: _ The purpose of this letter is to formally submit into the record, additional information in support of the above referenced matter. The items being submitted are as follows: (1) An affidavit from the surveyor with attachments clarifying a slight discrepancy in the wording of the actual legal descriptions enclosed with the MUSP. You will note that there is slightly different language between the descriptions on the deeds and the descriptions in the survey. This is as a result of the age of the legal descriptions contained in the MUSP and the most current survey. The affidavit from the surveyors serves to establish that while slightly different both surveys are of the same property, and to that effect I am also enclosing a copy of the signed and sealed survey. (2) Tax payment on the property. As you are aware this property is comprised of two folios inadvertedly only proof of payment for one of the folios was included in the MUSP book, therefore, I am sending you copies of both of the folios as attachments to this letter. I respectfully request, that you make these documents part of the official record of the City of Miami. Should you have any questions or require any additional information please do not hesitate to contact my office. Sincere , Vic Garc' Toledo 03- 811 Alva, Aiguesvives and Associat Inc Surveyors, Mappers and Land Planners 8230 Coral Way, Suite B Miami, Florida 33155 Office# 305-220-2424 Fax# 305-552-8181 04/03/03 AFFIDAVIT I hereby certify that the intent of the two attached legal descriptions (exhibit A and exhibit B) is to describe one and the same property, the only variations being the accretion or erosions along the rivers edge. 03— sit Ali ez, Aiguesvives and Asso& S, Inc Surveyors, Mappers and Land Planners 8230 Coral Way, Suite B Miami, Florida 33155 Office# 305-220-2424 Fax# 305-552-8181 Exhibit A This property is described as follows: Lots 1 thru 5 and the Easterly 250.00 feet of Tract "A", Block 395, and Lots 16,17,20, and 21, Block 39S, of Amended Plat of Block 39 South, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat book 42, at Page 6, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida, and the East 100.00 feet of Lots 18 and 19, Block 39S, City of Miami, according to the plat thereof recorded in plat Book B at Page 41, of the Public records of Miami Dade County, Florida; and all of that portion of land lying North of said East 250 feet of Tract "A' to the Miami River as it now exists; said portion also included in legal description shown in Warranty Deed recorded in OR Book 5788, Page 34, dated 20 November, 1967. U3— 811 Alva. _ z, Aiguesvives and Associa. , Inc Surveyors, Mappers and Land Planners 8230 Coral Way, Suite B Miami, Florida 33155 Office# 305-220-2424 Fax# 305-552-8181 Exhibit B LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 1 thru 5 and the Easterly 250.00 of Tract "A", Block 39S, and Lots 16, 17, 20 and 21, Block 39S, of Amended Plat of Block 39 South, according to the plat thereof, as rqcorded in Plat book 42, at Page 6, of the Public Records of Miami — Dade County, Florida, and the East 100.00 feet of Lots 18, and 19, Block 39S, City of Miami, according to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book B at Page 41, of the Public Records of the Public Records of Miami — Dade County, Florida. Miami -Dade County. Real Estate Tax Inforn-iation Real Estate Tax Inform on Page 1 of I Show Me: PropK Taxes h Search By: e ec em E Detail Tax Information: Real Estate Tax Info 2002 Taxes priorYears Taxes Due 2b�2 Non -Ad Valorem 26—o2 Back Assessments 2002 Enterpnse Folio 200 istorcalAements 2003ua�ipayments ® 2DD2 Miami -Dade County. All rights reserved. 2002 Taxes Today's Date: 0410912003 Last Update: 04/04/2003 Tax Year: 2002 Folio Number: 01 02030901011 MIAMI Owner's Name: FOMACK REALTY CORP Property Address: 615 SW 2 AVE Total Value: 2588500 Millage Code: 0100 Exemptions: None Gross Total Taxes: City Tax 26061.02 City Non Advalorem 414.00 State & County Tax 43363.86 Total Gross: 69838.88 2002 Taxes are in paid status. Payments Applied To 2002 Taxes: MW Is Zoic pr Miam (305 Down 140 W R Miam South 10710 R Miam Off M 8:30 a Date Applied Register/Receipt Amount Paid -70-1 a Ta 03/26/2003 001910000285 69838.88 Pro—pe Florida Re Amounts due are subject to change without notice. Pro ert Tax Home I Real Estate Tax Info 12002 Taxes I Prior Years 12002 Non -Ad V 2002 Bac ssessmen s 12002 En erpnse o IMURrs—to-fica atements uarte Mlami-Dade Home I Using Our Site I About I Phone Directory I Privacy J Disclaim E -mall your comments, questions and suggestions toWebmaster littp://egvsys.miamidade.gov: 1 608/wwwserv/ggvftcaw02. dia?folio=0102030901011 4/9/2003 03- 811 Miami -Dade County. Real Estate Tax Information Real t=atate Tax Inforrnanoll) Page 1 of 1 Show Me: ^rope axes 11 Search By: I.SeeTctltem Detail Tax Information: Real Estate Tax Info 2-02 Taxes Prior Years Taxes Due 203 on -Ad Valorem 2002 Bach essments 2002 Enterprise Folio 2002 istortca A atements 2003uartteayments 2002 Taxes Today's Date: 04/09/2003 Last Update: 04/04/2003 Tax Year: 2002 Folio Number: 01 02030901011 MIAMI Owner's Name: FOMACK REALTY CORP Property Address: 615 SW 2 AVE Total Value : 2588500 Millage Code: 0100 Exemptions: None Gross Total Taxes: City Tax 26061.02 City Non Advalorem 414.00 State & County Tax 43363.86 Total Gross: 69838.88 2002 Taxes are in paid status. MW .o` n�"�c pr miam {305 Down 140 W R Miam South 10710 R Miam Off M 8:30 a Payments Applied To 2002 Taxes: Date Applied Register/Receipt Amount Paid Rela Ta 03/26/2003 0019/0000285 69838.88 Prope Florida Re Amounts due are subject to change without notice. TropeTroperty Tax Home I Real Estate Tax Info 12002 Taxes I Prior Years 12002 Non -Ad V 2002 Back Assessments 12 erpr!se -_ o I Historick is uarte Miami -Dade Home I Using Our Site I About I Phone Directory I Privacy I D;sc!e'in ®2002 Miami -Dade County. - AII rights reserved. E-mail your comments, questions and suggestions towebmaster http://egysys.miamida.de.gov:1608/wwwsery/ggvt/txcaw02. dia?folio=0102030901011 4/9/2003 03- 811 ,.V.. vv.. -v !bIAGE01 : FL -01-160452-2 10/09/20L 43:24:24pm Y•t.lawMF• Otfa �t 5788 nz-! 34 •ear cw.r..,• h etawatwtat COB ARC 7'ITS ;: �'l�t,R ,�K�tlK$ttt. Afede, nu, p� d tir.f xata'mlxr race 1 of 2 *&&a" mom so's 1 A. to 67. ' Rt.ta f:i.�itfAMt Slt1i►YARQB CORFODA.t'101+1 1' . a fwpv 0►MA 7 eaitntcp ander the im of Ae 3we of FloT1da , Aeries its truorird r6V +f t C &tame" in #A I, C wnty of Dade and Star of Flor .da ; OW latrfaldr aathrtral a fsesatet brrbwf in tie Star od Atriay. Pw>' of the >+N war►. ord I Ptht°L'K RLILTY CORPORATION, Roots 700• 7313 Wisconsin twettue. Bethesda. Maryland, 20014 a ewpratie t ra"nag earn she &ps s of rhe Stun of Delaware • hating its j rrimPd pray a/ botittem N the County of OW safe N ad IWVIIr "JAri" to "Una 't letintr in Ar Stag Of Flrida Pam OI the serttad pat, if'IfNSSSUN.- nu lWaid party of she Ora parr, tr tmd toe o des nos a/ she tom -4 i Ton Dollars ($10.00) and otht'r valetablu considerstivn --IAAert t i ii in h•..d Maid 6r the said parts, of tae swatsd /art, A•• tempt rheewel u herrk, n•knoe4edstd. has Frent.d. harpitttd rat OW to the tai/ Party of she rered hart. its swam" and assrpwt larss.+ t the )..lftnt iwR detteihed fad wow. Iviep and lett/ in +Ar C wtity of Dad v j and State of FdrW saasit: Lots 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 16, 17, 18. 18, urd 20, in Sioux 39. SDUTW . CITY OF MIAMI. according to the Plat thereof, recorded in Plat Book "S", at Page 41, of the. Public Rtvords of Dade County. Florida, together with all of the property sounded on the south by the northerly boundary lines of said tots 3. 4, and 3; tlrt the west by the westerly beti-dart' lint' of Lot b produced n"ttherl to the Miami River: on the ':est by tnv easterly boundary Linc of Said Lot 3 produced nort.-icrly to the Miami River and un the north by the Miami River; 70GITM WIrA all improvements thereon including. without limitation, any buildings and marine railways; SUDJWT TO conditions, restrictions, limitations and essumunts of record, if any, without reimposing same: StRJACT FMTRBR TO all mortgages of record which encumber aIi or any portion of the property hereby conveyed. THIS CORRRCTM WARRAM'TY DiiD is executed and delivered to correct the legal description not forth in that certain war- ranty Deed, dated October 16, INS, and filed.for record on December 27, 1968, in Official Records Book 3321. at Pagv 443, OZ the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, under Cierkf i• Pile No. 86R-191069. tAMz•-�P 1A�(I t q �tiw'a• . '. evttruo►ui' I {d e„f„twt, I i�ant tae es"J'" 44 rhe Am part data Aw a8y 1U* tranw tae NNr to tett had ttad trig clod/.wd tae odereaaise the Mafotfwms of all p+a+n dtstaaaetw. :MAGEO! : FL -01-!60452-2 1010912001 -:24:24pm 1 2 of 2 jb MWOO VONVA At AM P" 1$ 1,16 $0 PM 169 411011IMP11 " POISON 80 60 aww 10 ad lebearced, woad by beta 7 'A* ANY -i yaw SISM MrAmm JuAMIL. v AIPM joy soon of wn 3 %aft 60%. Am as ab dq tj Nmomber A.D. J. Webster. Drawn (PreiSident) OW Albert Starts (Secretary) F*AWMI MI(Seepwapy MOPWlip"N tj/ 11l AMI WiPYASW CMPMATION . a arpowism undov Aw Amws of SAP sow 401 Florida . . fiv 1114 kowes. so Aw &kv pmmu mow mtPVS1 SAW f"". ", OMMMOW as MA 400 and ftmn achmiswedw Me osmannom AWOO a he Aiwar IMF an and OkI4 an A" mom— or sho am Sod Purpows dovoin mom" td and she SheT orimr4 1100*4,86 #A-- "I,. VW met bi aid nSrPvWi", OW She# *.* Said ku;mww ip AV Ort mid " of Saw mpme". '414wsw P",v F.aad r d goicial o"I at 1119011 m Mr County c4 Dade Pad Stwv *I Florida Ow day mW !Par Aar plarowiL by Commlax1an Expires: November 26, 1969 lFotiaiji�pitblie. stile oil plorida at Large. c- c UnA 3- 811 Real Estate Tax Information :l f��JJ7 t •I:,T � [���t� Show Me: ropey axes Search By: Iselect item Detail Tax Information: Real Estate Tax Info 2602 Taxes Prior Years Taxes Due 2002 Non -Ad Valorem 2002 Back Assessments 2002 Enterprise Folio 2002 Historical Abatements 2003 Quarterly Payments ffi 2002 Taxes on ac Today's Date: 03/31/2003 Last Update: 03/27/2003 Tax Year:2002 pr Folio Number: 01 02030901010 MIAMI miam Owner's Name: FOMACK REALTY CORP (305 Property Address: 615 SW 2 AVE Down Total Value : 1501000 Millage Code: 0100 140 W R Exemptions: None Miam South Gross Total Taxes: City Tax 15112.07 10710 City Non Advalorem 461.00 R Miam State & County Tax 25145.51 Total Gross: 40718.58 Off 2002 Taxes are in paid status. M 8:30 a Payments Applied To 2002 Taxes: Date Applied Register/Receipt Amount Paid Rela Ta 03/26/2003 0019/0000287 40718.58 Prope _Florida Re Amounts due are subject to change without notice. Property Tax Home I Real Estate Tax Info 12002 Taxes I Prior Years 12002 Non -Ad V 2002 Baric Assessments 12002 nterpnse o io 12002 Riistorica Abatements 12023 Quarte Miami -Dade Home I Using Our Site I About I Phone Directory I Privacy I Disclaim © 2002 Miami -Dade County. m All rights reserved. E-mail your comments, questions and suggestions toWebmaster 03-- 811 http://egvsys:miamidade.gov:1608/wwwserv/ggvt/txcaw02.dia?folio=0102030901010 3/31/2003 83!26!2003 17:20 2034880x'9 STORER PAGE 02 JOWT WRTIE'I'EN CONSENT OF T)IE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND THE STOCKHOLDERS OF FOMACK REALTY CORPORATION Pursuant to Sections 141(f) and 228 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the "Code"), the undersigned members of the Board of Directors (the "Board") of Fomack Realty Corporation (the "Corporation"), and the undersigned holders (the "Stockholders") of at least a majority of the Corporation's outstanding stock entitled to vote on the matters addressed herein, do hereby consent to and adopt the following resolutions, which shall have the same force and effect as if taken and adopted at a meeting of the Board and a meeting of the Stockholders, in each case, duly called and held. WHEREAS, the Board deems it advisable, expedient and for the best interests of the Corporation and the Stockholders to sell that certain] 2.2 acre parcel of land located at the intersection of Southwest 7s' Street and 1'` Avenue, Miami, FL to NEO i1, LLC, a limited liability company organized under the laws of the State of Florida, for a cash purchase price of seven million U.S. dollars (USS 7,000,000) (the "Sale '), substantially in accordance with that certain Land Acquisition Term Sheet (the "Term Sheet") attached hereto as Exhibit A, as the same may be modified in accordwide with these resolutions; and W13EREAS, the Stockholders, having been duly made aware of the foregoing determination by the Board, and having read and understood the Term Sheet, deem it to be in their best interests, and in the best interests of the Corporation to approve, authorize and affirm the effecting of the We substaxiftally in accordance with the Terre Sheet, as the same may be modified in accordance with these resolutions. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board hereby umnimously approves, authorizes and affirms, and recommends to the Stockholders that they approve, authorize and affirm, the effecting of the Sale substantially in accordance with the Term Sheet, as the same may be modified in accordance with these resolutions; FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Stockholders hereby approve, authorize and affirm the effecting of the Sale substantially in accordance with the Term Sheet, as the same may be modified in accordance with these resolutions; FURTHER RESOLVED, that pursuant to and in accordance with Sections 141(f), 228 and 229 of the Code, the Board and the Stockholders hereby waive any and all requirements of the Code, the Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation and the Bylaws of the Corporation, with respect to notice; FURTHER RESOLVED. that the officers of the Corporation are, and each hereby is, authorized, empowered and directed to negotiate the Term Sheet and the definitive terms and conditions of the Sale and any and all attendant agreements, contracts, letters, memorands, amendments, certificates, inswu ments, forms, and other documents that they deem necessary, desirable and/or appropriate in order to consummate the Sale (the "Sale Documerds"), making 173190\1143910 363343 v 1 412= 3:04 PM 3- 11 03/26/2003 17:20 203488OGr STORER PAGE 03 such modifications to the Term Sheet and the Sale Docunmmn is as they may deem necessary, desirable and/or appropriate, and upon completion of such negotiations and modifications, to sign, execute, seal, verify, acknowledge, accept, amend, consent to,. attest to, certify, deliver, file and/or record, as applicable, each and all of the Sale Documents and the Tenn Sheet on behalf of the Corporation; FURTHER RESOLVED, that the officers of the Corporation are, and each hereby is, authorized and dirowed to take any and all other actions that they deem necessary, desirable and/or appropriate in order to (a) perform the Corporation's obligations and duties under the Term Sheet and the Sale Documents, and (b) carry out the fail intent and purpose of and to consummate the actions contemplated by these resolutions; and FURTHER RESOLVED, that all actions previously taken by any officer or director of the Corporation in furtherance of the Sale and these resolutions are hereby ratified, affirmed, approved and adopted. IN WMESS WKMOF, the Corpora 'on duly caused this Written Consent to be executed by the undersigned effective as of 3 2002. DIWTORS: WA !"MMAW WF -2 STOCKIj[OLD1ERS: .. I James Webster Brown \73 190%1141% ig 563543 v 1 a=2 Sha PM Teresa Brown Storer b. M. � a• :. Teresa Brown Storer M2114MI.W..�00 03/26/2003 17:20 2034880-5 STORER PAGE 04 such modifications to the Term Sheet and the Sale Documents as they may deem necessary, desirable and/or appropriate, and upon completion of such negotiations and modifications, to sign, execute, seat, verify, acknowledge, accept, amend, consent to, attest to, certify, deliver, file and/or record, as applicable, each and all of the Sale Documents and the Tern Sheet on behalf of the Corporation; FURTHER RESOLVED, that the officers of the Corporation are, and each hereby is, authorized and directed to take any and all other actions that they deem necessary, desirable and/or appropriate in order to (a) perform the Corporation's obligations and duties under the Term Sheet and the Sale Documents, and (b) carry out the full intent and purpose of and to consummate the actions contemplated by these resolutions; and FURTHER RESOLVED, that all actions previously taken by any officer or director of the Corporation in furtherance of the Sale and these resolutions are hereby ratified, affirmed, approved and adopted. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corpora 'on has duly caused this Written Consent to be executed by the undersigned effective as of '/ 2002. DIRECTORS: Dorothy DeOrsey Brown Bruce L. Brown STOCKHOLDERS: Dorothy DeOrsey Brown Bruce L. Brown Webster 0:3190111439% # 563543 v 1 412=29:01 PM Teresa Brown Storer Donna Brown Dolan Teresa Brown Storer Donna Brown Dolan 000— ®i . S W 7 STREET AND 1 AVENUE SD-7/CENTRAL BRICKELL RAPID TRANSIT COMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT Per City Code, Chapter 36. Construction Equipment Request for waiver of noise ordinance while under construction for continuous pours. Per CITY CODE, Chapter 23-5a, Request for a Certificate of Appropriateness for ground disturbing activity in an Archeological Conservation Area. MUSP, per Article 17, Section 1701, any residential development involving in excess of two hundred dwelling units. MUSP, per Article 17, Section 1701, any single use or combination of uses requiring or proposing to provide in excess of 500 offstreet spaces. The Major Use encompasses the following special permit: Class II Special Permit as per. Article 15, Section 1514, for any development on property adjacent to the Miami River. Class II Special Permit as per Article 7, Section 607.3.1, for temporary construction fence within in the SD -7 overlay district. Class II Special Permit as per Article 7, Section 607.3.1, for development of new construction within the SD -7 overlay district. Class II Special Permit to request a waiver of Guides and Standards to omit and reduce the five feet border in the periphery landscaped area Class H Special Permit as per Article 9, Section 9223, a request to reduce one of the loading space dimensions from 12x 55 to 12 x 35. Class II Special Permit as per Article 9, Section 922.3, a request to reduce the required backup dimension for offstreet loading requirements. CLASS H SPECIAL PERMIT, as per Article 4, Section 401, for a temporary construction fence and covered walkway; CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 920.1, to allow a construction trailer and watchman's quarters; Class I Special Permit as per Article 9, Section 915.2, for FAA clearance letter. Class I Special Permit as per Article 9, Section 9253.8, to allow development/construction/rental signage. Class I Permit as per Article 9, Section 918.2, for parking and staging of construction during construction. Class I Permit as per Article 9, Section 920.1, to allow a trailer for construction and other temporary office uses such as leasing and sales. Class I Special Permit as per Article 9, Section 906.6, for pool/outdoor recreation area. Class I Special Permit as Article 9, Section 917.1.2, to allow valet parking for residential and other uses. CLASS I SPECIAL PERNUT as per Article 9, Section 920.1, to allow a construction trailer and watchman's quarters; REQUEST that the following MUSP conditions be required at the time of Temporary Certificate of Occupancy or Final Certificate of Occupancy instead of at issuance of foundation permit: � I rci McPhee ping Inspector II `O Date NEO VERTIKA S.W. 7TH. ST. & S. W. IST. AVE. MIAMI— FLORIDA DEVELOPER NM 30 M 3 RD AVO MM - FLORIDA JM ARCHITECT R E V U B L T A V E G' A L E 0 N P. A. ARCHITECTURE INTERIOR DESIGN' * PLTIMING 20 M "M AVMM MMA ROUDA M M*M-" LiSf OF DRAWINGS ARCHnECTURAL A -MA -Mk mojwCUM MW A lZr OP MA"M A-= r nm RM RM M ZEAL I A-2 Lam 2 AA IZAL3 LEVEL 4 A4 LBVIL S A4 IEVIL , A-7 AMMM� IBM A-4 IBM: LBm A-Rt,mws A-0 UMU K. 20, n, 24 A-0 IEvmda.a,a,a A -M A -5 M 26 ILEZYVJ2, L A-5IBM A. A-9 A-0 M WAA A-0 30M KMATM A WWXMATM Al BUr IMAM Kamm mmm A Buamm x9cim a I 4 CAR Date. -- Dat - �,r M10 40, wsp SUBMITTAL MARCH 26, 2003 imply Z 0 J Lu P, 3-26-03 ui w/Jcs t-C)Q ft'r-a 0224 I NOTE: .) Ndw9h 9) 7h.b—. 9r w99m .) TM 9m9Y 0 L. td*O «.w W.. 9) N W00.1 N N. MaIA' nTM9rww MIAMI RIVER mw9.d.nmtl. aM.n Mman w dN..m.rre.r..•. I.,... I.rul nuwML. M P �2 FOR: Boundary 911ovm Surve A •,W ri.YM MO •NCaMM..r 9M-9aMMaA Cu . CMrrm a.m 9...M. CP. .Carom h4 l i , 1`011 ea . C.\ bft _CYr U. •1 dl . CMM Ii0 Fna C CL Cbw rw LOCATION MAP- Lamm b_ omrrr onOMHW. Il^ . (9CM[ I••90Y) - oan \ Mw,rmrr. wm tar.y. f...mM r--mr—� . .Ir11F .M1[ KK F.N. . . Fir.M I r r : rm0 w FFL . Me FPL .k \Uj. -F. - YNr LA LA . ue..rerw. .W L9. . trr 9v M . Maaa. w Yr I aw F w arr�mYnrm r rnr •.•. r.r ma r es..a r rM. m r s arr `u.•rr Nr r wrwrm r► rr�i� wu,�'ia N - MmnmF! Lbr M.C. _ Mwigw W LP. _ Mad W. FW rr..'iaaP%'rairr r. , F.r Ma r rr ..wsr Y Y W Y..r ..rar Y res a... a no . Mr \ a. -- r I0 . I9wbM O.W. O.W. O rW N I n Fu.rorr .eraY ' A. U U.uWlyur :OMrwMNux 1. M.aW.nNwY.'IW a. -d• P9 NO 9ao1 i r..r.Y r•.. Wr w..r N.aai.a a .�. rr (im w.w? PC . ►aM r L1.v.... ....A,- w.w rr r Ya_•M raa PCP • Ps.rr. Canm9 Prr. a M. •. w ralb �•m.IwnY .br M a•r Mw Nrr. pe w.•r+. r .y�r-r-.r ...r r n ^wrr r mammM. rs, PA , A*A r MMmWm r.+.rar rr..w M..a res. Wes.. P\WT i ftkr e. r...ray r raY rr.r b.. Yl•. L. .. INPa.TW. i �MrnY. .W... 'uwr.w. M. w r..a M r M PL '- FW.Ir ..'Y'.. w•ah.,. K9♦ �. I.alaW.rllyd rrvr'N r. r.V..M m,...•r• r m r... Mm. ,P,,,a P&L - POM.19yYWp i rru. ,�. _h ... r..w r•P..r rmlw ar Ii.r.a PAA. _ PAY r CYr....alm a ..'r'.,oY'M rr'r..""..I,L rhnal Y YY. I.•rrll•. w/. Y,r.. PP. _ hes Pam PAM. • Patl r Ilrl.rarra MparmR PT Pow d TOOK" \ Ilrl. _ Wrm wrh TMI M .I..... •Y_M,.r Yrw• �Y.Fr,F.y Y W.,• Y IL• 9mMYra rY. M r_w.w�wr�r w r_�wpltwry..r MM RL9. • M/mrM Inr 9uMym r � Y Yrr i r w. W..www .i r.r..`i+i AyM� rigs, rr M1 . RareM M.Yr rfl . rah r ...•.• •.r..+ Yes„ v .... Y.w � = 9rNWr. M.Or 9Mawrr TM Meg- �� * • Pdmw Pain - r wiz UA. U9RP Eamrr9 UR . UWT -�/- �, W.F.. wood Fra W.M. .. W_ Mrm e ELEVATION NOTE: (IF APPLICABLE) Alvarez, Alguesvives and Associates, Inc. Al >tids 9wleed LF.EIm�.•_d9mW ioweq Ilebk\bb Noor elev\tbn. h91bOn - '- gw."wNW ypP,,, E I N.o.v.D.IM. L.B. NO. 6867 City of MI9mi BM, NBD @ N.W. Cor., s. 6 ST. & Surveyors, Mappers and Land Planners S.W. IN Aw. Elbv.-8.351 8230 Coral Way, (sults.B) Miami, FL 33155 GwW El's'' . Ems' Phone 305-220-2424 Fax 305-552-8181 FLOOD INFORMATION: iField Date SCala: File: Drwg. No. ROOD ZONE: COMM. No. PANEL Na SUFFIX F.IJi.rr.DATE BABE ELEV. 9/27/02 1'=30' BLOCK398 02-4773 AE 120990 0191 J 3r!/09 .. hn r n.. n MAR , 8, 2003 C'M t _ GENERAL NOTES Bid•• mrxmoeuer VFW • 3e"�F.,�F•yln6` �siJi�.$'-2i - �1s�`��'s ��m.xc� rAwlcmnc ®o:. rluam mrnc �Wm�f*Aa _ mmmmx WE " fir' mAIWONO1106.AWAM 0.T'«"'..:Si•L'ft:� PAL i�ZLa a r. neA�r-•. - a i7i7CiA. r ���r...r.«._ 3�c.., _ _ Wu =y� ��IY®�— ® �C011M7 QYMD AOION �'�t r��`• rrw r• M iiCl(t'ilr• -izz.� =Afs.�-:.r:.��ta.�ii$s ��,�'v'E�2•e3� ^•..�— a9m TIN1K —+ i aNAIgN '.y.�.w�r• «'� "��.�iiSSrrrr ®gyp a•I mAm RLWA SYMBOLS k ABBRkVNTIONSUMMU -DHF- LL- Xa- L R + ®� � �-.�.... - '�, � •fpr . PROIECT DATA 9A66s rAAllNAVAA MWA•a6ra Wmftw=orAN0W#= Cmwowmfta"m"ff 7f MAR MMmV•MMa WO1aW.fAOMrMIMV2AWp1:ACf9Y l60[l»AtOWAi1RfNO1l �1KpAmi aN Or a00Il1d1A�A600WC Aaa11R pMWprOMaW��7��opppv�mffN O, m MQ4aM11,NK11000 aM��1((M A1R A60d66rlOM1�6Q}eq NSWI�OONILV OFAWM 1WU APO A0Kp1�HR= O06WIp MWNICN061A.p AVM •OIN QOIW.Aa10A _'- -MUM -•n I ImN+ � 1 w� �•ovaw. wwon Ios .� suln1°a'"' �rvnioOdM<N1 N.W A -A K! uW IaA qw Y.1 La Aws ) Onaar.IK-•. Ya. AK o nnA AA• . AUa n� ,K.n Y . u I ato.,w. I ..•M .uo ,nNn v I u I n.oer l- AYq . W. IM Y I w Aa1AWro1 Y•AN aWMA , a.l�mro- .IAA v. Y. • . rr v I yr v. •.III v. � NO. as 1 V.lkw., LL1a 1 V. V. • I IY• W V. V. IAV. V. n Y.V. V. n MWW. WAa v. I� q0 V. Va V. Kn• Y. YW V. W ,N ,» V. KAI v. aA1 v. W uua a Km v. v t '• s n,N Y. YA v. Y n V. WAn Y. V IVn V. I,.01 Y. nJA V. V. A NAY V. V. 11 YMAM a •Ira - Tom Wr Wr 3fA6 WdNa4 W M OlY1r6 WV Wr MAmr rONI W NI WIVE 6nMOVA= Wr WTMMWFMWW m IWNOL salt PAMOVAM Wr Wr Mw GMOOW /MNM%M MM OaYW We Wr&wwuom Tomm: NSmowm6 we Wr naw ac.rn6/) WMWW: Wmovam Wr Wr naw6ol•om NBQt�ilflLtII ". . e9WED YAIAIW ~ WAVY WIAaa a 9016 a 5WM WNArAAON AIIn NIm Wr tdNB�i.OSiA W ALAvR@tdX W S40mA®IIMIS. wl.� Wor C6AaOAM WiM IBQIM®. •M:VAM wim OVa 7 N!AM OY97 or !AM Ola 1 W !AM Ipa• "SPAM avq f IV *Am lee• Mm MF.IAI DI PAM W KVUW AAM III01lW. pail{ W A•.Y•. own J Q I W oe 3-26.03 acs LOm VI6••r•O' 0224 A -WA _ _ . � ..� ^ . _� •:sir :. _ �:w:e-:, t t L\ 12: I I I I I M'. "i �� IVIS W Q Ira �OiI1 -2&*3 lc -_s .OR )224 �-2 J �I �I MAR % 6 2003 R V L A v � �N�l 6 seacwM -1 RD■ -4--1 . cc I \ tam • wr 1 r I uaa , u«r a �l Ia?M MI RIVER - -'- - �tS. W: - IST. AVENU---- E------- -- I I I I II ; rw------}-- L --- --------- msie...rs ou I I .•w.rac[ta Ruw MI LW V �j LU `1 I f" J W D &26.03 W -jcs LOR {(. 0224 A-3 � ------- Gni Ail, I� r MAR % 6 2003 R V L A v � �N�l 6 seacwM -1 RD■ -4--1 . cc I \ tam • wr 1 r I uaa , u«r a �l Ia?M MI RIVER - -'- - �tS. W: - IST. AVENU---- E------- -- I I I I II ; rw------}-- L --- --------- msie...rs ou I I .•w.rac[ta Ruw MI LW V �j LU `1 I f" J W D &26.03 W -jcs LOR {(. 0224 A-3 MM 2 6 2003 R V hM•r y-VTILM ■1Y er i liA Mi Rlip N ti IRMTYm WH4 I� Ili I 1 � `<� �� p•O m®o emm e®m oem e®® m®o V,. \'n 0 ♦ ♦ 1 wSa ,•..•.,. W Ql.W iOW Q W RIVER MEMNM�L 2 Q. • , 1 �.� , r. NO Al —1 i I LEVEL - I SCAL_- ,_--_—_ ,•..•.,. W Ql.W iOW Q 1 IJ W D 3-2643 W JCS t_OR v. -f-0' 022,4 A- { J Q W RIVER 2 Q. Q 1 IJ W D 3-2643 W JCS t_OR v. -f-0' 022,4 A- { J 4R s 200$ , VL Kom"Lrwxr I .rn It TFIT'L- I J <1 I J W D 3-26-W W acs L.oR vw•to• ce 0224 A-5 J ni pig lal - II. • •• 1 1 � _ _ f i J <1 I J W D 3-26-W W acs L.oR vw•to• ce 0224 A-5 J I I I I I MAR z tf 2003 OEM Ido ra PC naStt ■f wws �.`r•'C _ _ _ 1 i r �. I I r. ■.. I \ rel �3F9 \\1 yn 4 ,-;:? 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I \ \ lUSCL LU OVER Q I I . r w . I 3-2603 W acs ole c . ■-- ■ u - LL 0224 A-6 J W mum I , 1 ;!4 II OVER Q I I w . 3-2603 W acs LOR vw.(- ' LL 0224 A-6 J ►.W.! �I MAR 2�r; �L �YCOrM KIM a� "MTV LK _._I ._._._ •.* RN62 o"m 3-2"3 JCS LOR yWyVq 0224 A-8 J o: \ 1 ' �� oo .cc o ce �c. cc p ❑c •.cc oc .cc a ��. �� �' I I RN62 o"m 3-2"3 JCS LOR yWyVq 0224 A-8 J MARtiJ �- 1 I R V L IrQrr r Q IMAM OVER LU y �^ _7 Old 1 .. 4-'d 1 ..I 1 I •l = 1 . 1 1 ��� 1 1 • 1 1 r.. ccl 1 ';A4 1 -• � 1� rJ� IIcJ JI'IrJ r:/11rJ r J11�. ir.Ui�`....1�-. 1 I I MARtiJ �- 1 I R V L IrQrr r Q IMAM OVER LU y �^ <1 J W D 3.2603 W JCS LOR w' .IB{4' oe 0224 A-9 J LIAR 2 6 2003 , 3.26-03 JCS 1 _Of2 VW.(.O' 0224 _ 1&4 iAvi ;04 �i���i >.. i 1 I IMI I 1 J W D 3-26-03 W JCS LOR �/ ulsxa {i 0224 A -II J '' 11 _ ABA, � �. All ;Z 1 I o _ 1&4 iAvi ;04 �i���i >.. i 1 I IMI I 1 J W D 3-26-03 W JCS LOR �/ ulsxa {i 0224 A -II J : i :!:!i s�i!:•D� •i�i:!waO• i i �i i i•� •�•ii!i 1i?OOc ••i!i i �•�. Q � D 1 MAR 2003 w. R V L area. 0 PR R» O�Orm '7m 40— A ^ li r t w? 7 1) D w. 0 PR ; W I TJ I y, 1 TZ --- * ------ I r - RaanUNI wrenr I II i I ' -_ ----�_ ----------------------- �._._._._.__.+ -- - - - _- i - � S. W. - IST. AVENUE— - - - - — - - i I I I ro----u • �.f RvlK I - -L-EVE A 182b,22i;24 - K111D rt i o rwein necme BOALS f - W -W { �f Q u W os-asm XZ/OJ L.OR vw-r-a 0224 A-12 J r I I I I OR t 6 2003 R V L x. 1 � i♦ I � 1 I I r MOMMIKIWw4r 1 II iIr I I .. I""""'"'" "I`LL' _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ --------- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ----- ---- _ _ _ 1 _ —.—,+ -----;---- _-aQ-�S. W: -IST. AVENUE — - — - — - - — - —- 1 I I i 1 _ II i r;�---------------� 1 roa.e.,,isw 1 I rine larxcx w Lw I � WIeN LN j------------------------------------------------ -0--LEVELS-99's�1,231?5 irfu,oluatrae,o.twcn,. 8C11L6T-w-w W D 'i W 3-46-03 JCS L_C R vw-r- • 0724 A-13 \ L ■ ©►111' 1116 i•�La 7, 1 4141 :iii. dui MR , iC i CilED Elm Imo\ dol IDI ICI ICI ICI IOL ICI ICL -. •� � �• . . 9 I � VOIN � oc�ooiooia.�a FAM 1 x. 1 � i♦ I � 1 I I r MOMMIKIWw4r 1 II iIr I I .. I""""'"'" "I`LL' _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ --------- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ----- ---- _ _ _ 1 _ —.—,+ -----;---- _-aQ-�S. W: -IST. AVENUE — - — - — - - — - —- 1 I I i 1 _ II i r;�---------------� 1 roa.e.,,isw 1 I rine larxcx w Lw I � WIeN LN j------------------------------------------------ -0--LEVELS-99's�1,231?5 irfu,oluatrae,o.twcn,. 8C11L6T-w-w W D 'i W 3-46-03 JCS L_C R vw-r- • 0724 A-13 .WR % 6 20 1 I R V l •� I.I� 1.1 �•� '•� , I. •. x•1.1•' ♦ '.'.:ill �• � �• 1 1 • 1 I �, . so•: i 1 :::❖:❖::::5❖:1::':•:1:.:•:!3:::..., .❖ ;_ h_,• r =� pk tEvEt 2e _- --_ , �s�rr.vv-r•v � � PSD � • � �• �.'� •D � •'� .''�'� .'.-�'.-v�7 �� , �� - �- - .•!�!:!�!:!:!�!:!�!�!i! �i❖% �i �:•: i•® •: i� • i�� i 'e i iii. i ii' �� i 1 w wi.ics LOR w' VW' -a 1L 0224 A-14 J MAR i m , R V L d P { Z>- ° e.» "! t 1 p - - - --� � � fl0lH1Y1►EIWfT ��f=�----� --- � Z � ra tyd a Ot LU J I 1 Ell. -Is 071 FAA, - 1 `I lug'i J104$115 AREi �.►\► i O Q U PM32 w `1 I J w D omo3 LU w/.Cs l_OR 19 V f.V 0224 A-15 J r . AWAR 2003 RVL war. rre,y� rmwa. w iro.r MR2t,� taw 1 I R V L asasrn JCS LOR y16•{q 0224 /m, - - - '__ =2511111:=� It II'.11 nnl Ilan num � 1111111 � ii 111 it 11111 Ililtl 1111111 ' 1111111 _ ; it 111 it 11111 111111 1111111 2511111€=. If 11 11 =1111111 it III if 12511 Illlt nn.. Illlit #almost IM:11i n.1111 IB 11" II I _ -=lllllli _ 1i Its i1 Asur ilial 1111111 iilll .targe ililll ' �uiilll =li ft` !e 111 11 111 1f If III �i�_i.: 1111111=� xl 111 i! 111 fi 111 i1 111 ll� - 1111111_=� 31 lie i,; 111 11 111 11 111 111 - 1125111== +1 if ° !! !fl a1 111 If 116 1!: 1111111 — it 111 11 111 1t 111 11 li: !!1 ' =_1125111 =� 11 If' if 111 ll 111 11 fll 111 = IIU!::__ it 111 it 111 11 111 11 111 111 - - _-"•_-�_1i II' II 11'_11 11' 11 111 111 1111111 _j if 111 it 111 it 111 11 lil 111 - i ._■ -� If If' if if 11 11, _11 11` Ili 91111111 - it Iii it 111 it 111 it 111 111 -.■ - II 11' it IVII 11' 11 11' 111 1111111 ±1 ::: 11 111 if 111 if Ill ill ' —_ __. •_- � i! 11' it IL' _il 11' 11 11' ..111 's! 1111111 it Ill 0 111 it 111 it 111 ill i_II II 11 11__11 11_._11 II__III �- _— i1 111 ii 111 it ill 11 111 111 ' 1,11111 = oae■�r�.: . =1111111 '_ I � M1,1111M All 11110111II1111IIX111111ill . i■ME■■N■■M■■ _ _= _ u ur m u n nr ui =1 --w --1- -===u :`—:=11 111 III 11 II 111 III =C�■■■ 1■■ III t■■- 1■■ I■■_ ::_..... ....... ... ..._,.. ul III III too III — -- -_--_ ,.. ,.. ,.. ,e■ "I ul I e■ ■ee- le■ ■■ in ■■■11� _II u. n■ 11 it n■ I ■ _II na w 11 11 ue n.III_ ell ■7■ Is 11 11 n■ u■ _II u■ IN 11 11 n■ u■ 11 eu IN 11 II I ■ ie■ .e IN .. 1� e■e is _ —_ Opp — WL7ti��tivti7ravvvlvi"■ �I. 1 _ Nan■ i lom■ i tint ;m i ugrnu�1 Inns. i lar■ �I I I I Ii it lu [if u III 1 111 W If 111 1; 11 Will li, III 1111"=; 111 11 11 ff III u III 11 11 fit 11 11 iG III C III W mill if millC# z a #F 6I #z asf Pa I a A A 4. $A, six Pr 6.1 me $is ii 11 ka: All nF leg 111= ve Fit II 11 it .II ON$ ,mill mill 11 11 I I lot iI 11 Vol I I 1 .9 rat A IN VIA III aY Pat in on* li 11 10, IRA 141 I Hum! I son I mmm1:"7-. 1111111 1 11111111W I too, i W "on mill gill —low 1 1� V:4 �nnw 111111 uui uui 11111111 111111 11111 11111 a III li =_1111111='_ 1111111 111111 11111 11111 IY 111 IY ==_1111111-i=_ •i1111111 111111 11111 11111 I X11 li 111111 11111 11111 11111 li X11 lY I =_1111111 1111 111 11 111 11 111 it 111 Ir__11 Ir_�==1Unu-' IIII 111 11 111 it 111 11 111 li X11 lY i==1111111=1€ 111 111 11 111 II 111 11 111 if- 11 11 i==`1111■..-- :_::.111 111 .:, 11 111 11 111 11 111 l 1 X11 IY-j __1111111- 111 111 11 111 11 111 II 111 Ir_ _11 Ir_)-`IInuA= ':'w 111 11 111 11 111 11 111 lY X11 IY �=1111111-_ m m u nI n nl a ni 1r_ --u Ir :•' 111 111 11 111 11 111 11 111 li III lY 2111111111- ur_ n If a 1r_ Ili 111 IY 111 li SII lY 111 lY X11 li ;__ulna= €!' 11!_ _II Ir_ 1 11 Ir_ _11 Ir_11 Ir _ _11 Ir_ =:Ilam :IIlk 111 1 111 1 X11 1Y X11 1 X11 lY __1111111-1= 11 Ir_if Ir_1=€un■.�=:_' Ili 111 lY 111 lY 11 -lY X11 lY 11 11 1111_'_11 IV 111 1x_111 If- _II Ir_111 If_ = IIIuu= Ilk 111 lY 111 lk 111 lY 111 li 111 lY 9€111111- =_ ';: 1nr_'�n Ir -gin -u-�u Ir_�u v_'�n 1x_1=€•..�__=-� 11Y 111 '..111 lY III .Ila li IIA I�II.i lY 111 I�IIi1 '�.11.� li 111 li �. -1111111 ■■11■I '1.11.1 '�■11■I 'dal. 1.111 1. __1111111- -- --,-- --� - _,-- --, -- --, A 1 1� V:4 I'mm Im �IIIllllli� Ii�ii l�� .'i'I�l1111111111�1�111■I�Illll� �II1 .' i'�1111�! �■IIIIIIiIII 11�11� .' I I�IIIIIIIII�1�111■I�IIIII� Ch1 I� .' I'�1111�■.! �III11111111�! 1111 �!!, I'I�IIIIIIIII�I I®IIIIIII�illll� 7I111� i -PR1 INMRM!■IIIgIIIIIR ILII N .`_I'I®IIIIIIIII�I IffiIIIIIII�IIIII� "Alm .M====MIII�IlION11"11■, .`A ■ ■■ ©1I IMPI 71111 .'I'i������111iIlIIl111�11■ .'ll® ■� ■■ ®�1 1311 -1 F PM.- IINIIN ILII■, .`',� ■!�I ■■ ��1 ���1 'till •I�!����II�IIIIIII.'11■� Mill .' I'III��lIII I��IIIIi IIIIl��I I1111111��1111+1i ■ 111111 111111 111111 111111 _A Im :0-111111111 � i,l��llll I��111111lI1��i 11111111��11 Il�fl ■ .''II HIM WIN IIIIII 111111 :.1i11m .' iI�Allll UAI�11 Illlfl�I illll1111�11 Illi ■ III 111111 111111 Will 111111 !!"I'i1 I� .' I';I��III11 I��111111111��1 I11111111�1111+II ■ 1'111 WIN HIM Will 111111 ! MAR Gtli;3 BUILDING SECTION 90ALS r - W -a T d�� "DAP R� R� OIOs� a 0 W sum J Q U W �! Q J W D 3-0-03 W o � LOR vra+a ile 0224 A-13 ILNN 't -aw, - wir, -ww'- -4v W-. win -'aar, ww'- -'t- �nMNW, owir, swir" -f wm' wk�'mm Zr- 144F 114W, P14 Ar'4W fA R' 1"i F14 F,457 F'A" 11L FA ]';i FA 7-, ii R pi" i F; R OR m PR ;A a MEN �I■�� li:, MCI INO T JIMI1 Will "A NEI 1111011111■; xV"TM VT -OM -A ;z ml SIZE 7MIWKPAJMS ftft, 11111011111, MU, .Lail ISM il 1 m1m 10,11%.11 OEM Mb P -'l 1110,%NENEEmn� �'sons 0 Omni mom 7 Ai4l�- l -A I t-� � Ing JA7i * �'r. AQ 7 JAI il 'Al�\ .■ \ � . ! . r \lad.� \ \ »� .■ r \lad.� \ \ »� Q MAR I kI 204 NEO VERTIKA Existing Condition REVUELTA VEGA LEON P. A Miami, Florida ARCH= =- NTL"DEM@I • PLUS" ............................ NEO VERTIKA Miami, Florida L Existing Condition REVUELTA VEDA LEON P. A NICHrnWV - xn®ea DOW • PLAW" I ........................... F. MAR 1 M NEO VERTIKA Miami, Florida L Existing Condition REVUELTA VEDA LEON P. A wanwrure . �wre uon oc�a� • ""NG N NEO VERTIKA Miami, Florida c- 3D Model Study 4 MAR 2003 REVUELTA VEDA LEON P. A Anwteonne . M9" Deem+ • w W ............................ NEO VERTIKA a mixed use project Developed By: NEO Concepts, LLC 3375 SW 3rd Avenue Miami, FL 33145 (305) 285-1418 Designed By: Revuelta Vega Leon, P.A. 2560 S.W. 27th Avenue Miami, Florida 33133 (305) 529-1080 Prepared By: Bilzin Sumberg Baena Price & Axelrod LLP Vicky Garcia -Toledo, Esq. 2500 Wachovia Financial Center 200 South Biscayne Boulevard Miami, FL 33131 Submitted Into the public record' in connectior, with item lz^1___pn Priscilla A. Thompson City Clerk 03—_b. I. II. NEO VERTIKA a mixed use project TABLE OF CONTENTS Project Information A. Application for a Major Use Special Permit B. Disclosure of Ownership Ownership Affidavit Owners List C. Warranty Deed Tax Folio Information D. Zoning Write -Ups E. Directory of Project Principals F. Project Data Sheet G. City of Miami Zoning Atlas Map Project Description A. Zoning Ordinance No. 11000 1. Section 1304.2.1 Application Forms; Supplementary Materials 2. Section 1702.2.1 General Report 3. Section 1702.2.2 Major Use Special Permit Concept Plan III. Supporting Documents Tab 1 Minority Construction Employment Plan Tab 2 Traffic Impact Analysis Tab 3 Site Utility Study Tab 4 Economic Impact Study Tab 5 Survey of Property Tab 6 Drawings Submitted April 2003 pSubmitted IInto he public y I et.a`o rid'' ii 5 �."Cn bP✓�.t .., ivifl d iter'1"i Cz-1 OD 1 17-03 Priscilla A. Thompson City Clerk NEO VERTIKA a mixed use project PROJECT INFORMATION ARTICLE I. A. Application for a Major Use Special Permit B. Disclosure of Ownership Ownership Affidavit Owners List C. Warranty Deed Tax Folio Information D. Zoning Write -Ups E. Directory of Project Principals F. Project Data Sheet G. City of Miami Zoning Atlas Map April 2003 Submitted Into the public record in connection with item pz_-.L_....on-7 .lx_03 Priscilla A. Thompson City Clerk 03- 811 PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT HEARING BOARDS DIVISION 444 SW 2"d Avenue, 7"1' Floor • Miami, Florida 33130 Telephone 305-416-1480 • Fax 305-416-2035 APPLICATION FOR. MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT IT IS INTENDED THAT MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMITS BE REQUIRED WHERE SPECIFIED USES AND/OR OCCUPANCIES INVOLVE MATTERS DEEMED TO BE OF CITYWIDE OR AREA -WIDE IMPORTANCE. THE CITY COMMISSION SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR DETERMINATIONS ON APPLICATIONS FOR MAJOR USESPECIAL PERMITS. (SEE ARTICLE 17 OF ORDINANCE 11000, AS AMENDED, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA.) THE DIRECTOR OF THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING SHALL MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS ON ALL APPLICATIONS FOR MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMITS AND FOR ANY AMENDMENTS THERETO AND SHALL TRANSMIT SAID APPLICATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD FOR ITS RECOMMENDATIONS AND MAY MAKE REFERRALS TO OTHER AGENCIES, BODIES, OR OFFICERS FOR REVIEW, ANALYSIS, AND/OR TECHNICAL FINDINGS AND DETERMINATIONS AND REPORTS THEREON. (SEE SECTION 1301.4 OF ORDINANCE 11000, AS AMENDED, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CI7Y OF MIAMI, FLORIDA.) ANY PERSON WHO RECEIVES COMPENSATION, REMUNERATION OR EXPENSES FOR CONDUCTING LOBBYING ACTIVITIES TO REGISTER AS A LOBBYIST WITH THE CITY CLERK, PRIOR TO ENGAGING IN LOBBYING ACTIVITIES BEFORE CITY STAFF, BOARDS, COMMITTEES AND THE CITY COMMISSION. A COPY OF SAID ORDINANCE IS AVAILABLE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK (MIAMI CITY HALL), LOCATED AT 3500 PAN AMERICAN DRIVE, MIAMI, FLORIDA, 33133, APPLICANTS ARE RESPONSIBLE, IF/NEEDED, TO BRING AN INTERPRETER FOR THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE TO ANY PRESINTATION BEFORE CITY BOARDS, COMMITTEES AND HE CITY COMMISSION. POWER OF ATTORNEY WILL BE REQUIRED IF NEITHER APPLICANT OR LEGAL COUNSEL REPRESENTING THE,APPLICANT EXECUTE THE APPLICATION OR DESIRE TO MAKE A PRESENTATION BEFORE CITY BOARDS, COMMITTEES AND THE CITY COMMISSION. 1, Teresa Storer, as Secretary/Treasurer of Fomack Realty Corporation hereby apply to the Director of the Planning and Zoning Department of the City of Miami for approval of a Major Use Special Permit under the provisions of Article 17 of the City of Miami Zoning Ordinance. Property Address: 690 SW 18T Court, Miami, FL 33130 Nature of proposed use (be specific): Residential/Commercial Mixed Use 1. Two 11x17" original surveys and one 30"x30" original survey, prepared by a State of Florida Registered Land Surveyor within one year from the date of application. 2. Two 11x17" original plans and one 30"x42" original plan, signed and sealed by a State of Florida Registered Architect or Engineer showing property boundaries, existing (if any) and proposed structure(s), parking, landscaping, etc.; building elevations and dimensions and computations of lot area and building spacing. 3. Plans need to be stamped by the Hearing Boards Division first and then signed by Public Works, Zoning and Planning prior to submission of application. 4. Affidavit and disclosure of ownership of subject property and disclosure of interest (see attached forms). 5. Certified list of owners of real estate within a 500 -feet radius from the outside boundary of property (see pages 5 and 6). 175412\1 S 112\ # 612877 v 5 4 3/27/03 5:35 PM 51"?r am fF;+d Into the public ro=c;;:,=,rd i = connection with i%et-n J:z -I on Priscilla A. Thompson y City Clerk G. At least two photographs that, r the entire property (land and improvement_, 7. Maps showing the existing zoning designation and the adopted comprehensive plan designation for areas on and around the property. 8. General location map showing relation to the site or activity to major streets, schools, existing utilities, shopping areas, important physical features in and adjoining the project, and the like. 9. Concept Plan: a) Site plan and relevant information per Section 1304.2.1d -h in Zoning Ordinance 11000, as amended. b) Relationships to surrounding existing and proposed uses and activities, systems and facilities, per Section 1702.2.2a in Zoning Ordinance 11000, as amended. c) How concept affects existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan principles and designations; tabulation of any required variances, special permits, changes of zoning or exemptions, per Section 1702.2.2b in Zoning Ordinance 11000, as amended. 10. Developmental Impact Study (an application for development approval for a Development of Regional Impact may substitute). 11. Other (specify and attach cover letter explaining why any document you are attaching is pertinent to this application). 12. An 8 %Z x 11" copy of all exhibits that will be presented at the hearing. 13. Twenty-five (25) "Major Use Special Permit" books containing the above information. If this project requires Zoning Board approval, a total of thirty-five (35) books will be required. 14. Cost of processing according to the City Code: a) $ , for the Major Use Special Permit b) Additional fee of $ , for any required special permits, changes of zoning or variances. c) Total Fee: $ 17. What is the purpose of this Major Use Special Permit? A residential tower and aucillary retail/commercial space. Signature Name:Teresa Storer, Secretary/Treasurer, Fomack Realty Corporation Address 11 Grove Avenue Branford, Connecticut 06405 Telephone 203-488-0771 Date \75412\1811Z4612877v5 S IIiti3 the public3/27/03 5:35 PM 0�11 7-17.43 Priscilla Aa Thompson City Clerk 03 STATE OF CONNECTICUT COUNTY OF NEW HAVEN The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 21? day of `"� Lit , 2003, by Teresa Storer, SecretarylTreasurer of Fomack Realty Corporation, on behalf of the corporation. She is pully. known to me or who has produced as identification and she did (did not) take an oath. 1 VICTOR R. ALEXANDEI; Notary Public MyCommisslon Expires 2/20;20n4 ature (Stamp) STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this of day of 20031 by _a corporation, on behalf of the corporation. He/She is personally known to me or has produced as identification and who did (did not) take an oath. (Stamp) STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE Signature The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2003] by partner (or agent) on behalf of a partnership. He/She is personally known to me or who has produced as identification and who did (did not) take an oath. (Stamp) Signature Subrn,fted Into the public \75412U 81121 4 612877 v 5G 327/03 5:35 PM ° ... moi`<y a x ',".m_:;� ¢lir rr e i'l Priscilla A. Thompson City Clerk Note 1. Note 2. Note 3. NEO VERTIKA a mixed use project APPLICATION FOR MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT Request for A Major Use Special Permit To: a) A residential project of more than 200 units. b) A parking garage of more than 500 spaces. Request for a Class II Special Permit To: a) Permit a waiver of Parking Guides and Standards for: 1) distance requirement from parking space to column or wall; 2) back up space/distance. b) Reduction of loading berths. a) Class I Special Permit to permit permanent recreation facilities. b) Class I Special Permit to permit the staging and parking during construction. C) Class I Special Permit to allow development/construction/and signage. d) Class I Special Permit to allow construction fence/construction trailer. e) Class I Special Permit to allow valet parking service. Prisdfia A. UM 03- 8 .44.1 Note 4. To request from the City Commission: a) a waiver from the noise ordinance during the required concrete pours for construction of the project. Note 5. To apply for a Certificate of Appropriateness for ground disturbing activities, if needed. Note 6. To apply for all lesser permits as may be required to allow development and construction of this phase project as contemplated under this Major Use Special Permit application as submitted and as per plans on file. Note 7. The above Major Use Special Permit is to encompass all lower ranking special permits necessary to complete the projects as per plans under Tab 6. Submitted Into the public reco-rd in o'Drtnection with A. Thompson City �lw� k DISCLOSURE OF OWNERSHIP 1. Legal description subject real property: See attached Exhibit A. Street Address: 690 SW 1 Court, Miami, FL 33130 2. Owner(s) of subject real Property and percentage of ownership. Note: Section 2-618 of the Code of the City of Miami requires disclosure of all parties having a financial interest, either direct or indirect in the subject matter of a presentation, request or petition to the City Commission. Accordingly, question #2 requires disclosure of shareholders of corporations, beneficiaries of trusts, and/or any other interested parties, together with their addresses and proportionate interest. Fomack Realty Corporation: Teresa B. Storer -11 Grove Avenue, Branford, CT, 06405 20% Bruce L. Brown --402 N.E. 951x' Street, Miami Shores, FL 33138 20% Donna B. Dolan - 4828 S. Hemingway Circle, Margate, FL 33063 20% Dorothy D. Brown -1560 N.E. 105 Street, Miami Shores, FL 33138 20% J. Webster Brown - 23330 Water Circle, Boca Raton, FL 33480 20% 3. Legal description and street address of any real properly (a) owned by any party listed in answer to question #2, and (b) located within 500 feet of the subject real property. C^? Teresa Storer, Secretary/Treasurer STATE OF CONNECTICUT COUNTY OF NEW HAVEN The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of2003, by Teresa StorerSecretary/Treasurer of Fomack Realty Corporation, on behalf of the corporation. She is personally known to me or has produced - - - as identi , ation and'she di (did not) take an oath. Name: Notary u lic- tate of Coxuaecticut Commission No.: My Commission Expires: VICTOR R. ALEXANDER Notary Public My Commission Expires 2122/314 St*-,.mitted Into, the public a �,u 175412\181121#6I2877v5 lfl�.'- a ,_; tion, Ith 3/27/03 5:35 PM cq 11 b3_ r 'j - � A, Thompson City Clerk Submitted Into the PuUl, .. AFFIDAVIT recon"9 4`6cO@;"`er',ti� ,. STATE OF CONNECTICUT } rit`''e'®�2 ? I?- d'3 } S$ 15%R� fro 2� (���1�<� �n ePr r.s COUNTY OF NEW HAVEN } City C erk Before me, the undersigned authority, this day personally appeared Teresa . Storer, Secretary/Treasurer of Fomack Realty Corporation, who being, by me first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and says: That he/she is the owner, or the legal representative of the owner, submitting the accompanying application for a public hearing as required by the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, affecting the real property located in the City of Miami, as described and listed on the pages attached to this Affidavit and made a part thereof. 2. That all owners which he/she represents, if any, have given their full and complete permission for him/her to act in his/her behalf for the street closure as set out in the accompanying petition, X including responding to day to day staff ihquiries;_ not including responding to day to day staff inquiries in which case he/she should be contacted at 213-488-0771. 3. That the foregoing pages are made a part of this affidavit contain the current names, mailing addresses, telephone numbers and legal descriptions for the real property of which he/she is the owner or legal representative. 4. The facts as represented in the application and documents submitted in conjunction with this affidavit are true and correct. Further Affiant sayeth not. STATE OF CONNECTICUT COUNTY OF NEW HAVEN Teresa Storer, Secretary/Treasurer of Fomack Realty Corporation The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this Z? day of 2003, by Teresa Storer, Secretary/Treasurer of Fomack Realty Corporation, on behalf of the corporation. She is personally kno or has produced as identification and sh did Pid not) take an oath. Name: Notary public -State of Connecticut Commission No.: My Commission Expires: \75412\18112\# 612877 v 5 3127/03 5:35 PM F VICTOR R. ALEXANDER Notary Public My Commission Expires 2/28/2001 OWNER'S LIST Owner's Name: Fomack Realty Corporation Mailing Address: 11 Grove Avenue, Branford, Connecticut 06405 Telephone Number: (203) 488-0771 Legal Description: Legal description of subject real property — See attached Exhibit A Street Address: 690 SW 1 Avenue, Miami, FL 33130 Owner's Name: Mailing Address: Telephone Number: Legal Description: Owner's Name: N/A Mailing Address: Telephone Number: Legal Description: Any other real estate property owned individually, jointly or severally (by corporation, partnership or privately) within 500 feet of the subject site is listed as follows: Street Address Folio Number: Legal Description N/A N/A SjjLjrr. 'Rd into t se public. prlsdrle Am Thompson 0 3 x„ City Clerk EXHIBIT A Legal Description: Lots 1 thru 5 and the Easterly 250.00 feet of Tract "A", Block 395, and Lots 16, 17, 20, and 21, Block 39S, of Amended Plat of Block 39 South, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat book 42, at Page 6, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida, and the East 100.00 feet of Lots 18 and 19, Block 39S, City of Miami, according to the plat thereof recorded in plat Book B at Page 41, of the Public records of Miami -Dade County, Florida; and all of that portion of land lying North of said East 250 feet of Tract "A" to the Miami River as it now exists; said portion also included in legal description shown in Warranty Deed recorded in OR Book 5788, Page 34, dated 20 November, 1967. m- he pubiic \75412\18112\ # 612877 v 5 21 3/31/03 2:59 PM City Clerk 03-o .� 1, ray=. iNiAGECl : FL -01-160452-2 10/09/2U0i 03:24:24pm Page 1 of 2 w..,a•Y» etro 140, 57M `v! 34 e•Meos roe.+ al,+ ,•rot seer.�.,,er r ra•va.t+er• c0itRXt, s I VI nrrnn��, �lrp� Trht n. IQ 67. �A ,��SaPllhtl7• Made,rAi, 4 etay.f No•trmlxr ` 1tt:Tff F.EN MIAMI SHIPYARDS CORPORATION ` o rerpYrorie.r l,ti.ti„i, red w Cho, lnee of she $we of Florida hwinh us pru•ripel purr nl 6"neu in the CeYney of Dade and Stare e1 Flor :da i and larlativ earhadad a treatere beeimms in the ,Stoll, y Florida, 000v el the fool pert. a•d FOW'K REALTY CORPORATION, Room 700, 7315 Wisconsin ,.vruue. 80111esda, Maryland, 10014 o ewpnewisr rnainR wider the bows of CAP Attie til Delaware . Aa. itt,e irr primc�pol pian- of badtera in the Cattruy of seri stare *f and 1•Y'jYfh euthai ed a trema bovine" to fAr Stole of nw W& party of the rrrnnd pert, i R'Ir1'E33Erm. rho the said parry of the Ryer pert ra ted in reneeidl,t_— /4 tAe tam .d Ton Dollars ($10.00) and other valuable conxidvrativn - -A}t t i is in A..,uf paid by tAe said parry of the spewed fart. rA- tveripl whereof u h.vwb, a ina.d+d4red, has Fr•ntrd, barsninrd and sold to the aid parry el the teased pert. itt aserasnrs and auipu Jarret— t rhe l.dbw imp d►el,ribed lard .dung , ivinR w d yeittR on rhe C..ttery at Dad t j V4 stwe el Florida, twit: Lots 1. 1, 3. 4, S, 16, 17, 18, 19, urg 20, in Block 39, SOUTH. CITY OF MIAMI. according to the Plot thereof, recorded in Plat Hook "S", at Page 41, of the Public At -cords art Dodo County. Florida, together with All of the pr,aporty sounded on the South by the northerly boundary lines of said tots 3, 4, slid S, on the west by the westerly bo%i^dory lint of Lot 5 produced nuitherl� to the Miami River: on ".a grit by tnv easterly boundary line Of Said Lot 3 produced nort,ierly to the Miami River and on the north by the Mimi River; TOCITHER 1rITlt all improvonents thereon including, without limitatinn, any buildings and marine railways; SUBJECT TO conditions, restrictions, limitations And easements of record, if any, without rolsposinl; saas. SUBJECT FARTHER TO all mortgages oi' record ehich encumber all or any portion of the property hereby conveyed. THIS OORRICTIVI TARRAIITY Di ID is enacuted and delivered to correct the legal description set fot�th in that certain War- ranty Deed, dated October 26, 1966,.and filed for record on December 97, 196s, in Official Recorris Book 5391, at Page 443. of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, undor Clerltm File Mo. sea -193068. i.QC,l1AggiARY�; . 5TAA1P TAXI evei'rieotiii'rz 1 Submitted into thE pub �r a raeord in '1-101fi � ut1 � + ' ylta" Z„ —1 -on -17- tilw, ',prisdila A. ih nlP,'i� Cl z itAlAd 4 said pool of w Ara pert dere Amey f>gt auwaw LAW ekk ra said flied, wed a+L trl..d the ane apiau ►Al, Lse/ef t,ttlerr of ed) pveearu tdwaereew. ' � leu■ - � � .� :$. D-iAGEOI : FL -01-1-60452-2 10/09/20. 03 : 24 :24p, -n Paae 2 of 2 4 ore' [67.29� JIM "WMA w4wA Ak aw X" 40 the *0 Pan as, mono I&M P".0 0 6. *w & Tw eiww wig ed 0 two" Of DADR 3 Imbg %to%. Lhw 4a V A. 0. it 67, betem n* persafteLly appfwvd J. Webster Grown (President) fwd Albert Starts (Secrat&ry) wa SIVm" POOPWItV41, MIAMI BRIPYAJW CMPOUTION a ewpwvdm undi" Aw hers of 1AV State ul Florida I& Aw Awww. go 1w 11w Pffunu U*D w1ad lkw t, .. pamp ownvww iu n" alken wd awmAy acA,wwi*dpd rh* *swwian uhvpoq w he thri, Jeri an and jmd r et nit aoxwo * 160. us" " Powpows OATV114 nwAieftle Ow th" they sffiN4 #*@*of* the. .0'. &I mW rwpww", and Aw the s*W d1w:4uww is 04e are md " of aW cwpcWn, 'a"twou ftyl!apda d sairiai aroi w Maul to thr cumly of Dade Phd Soup *I Florida Ow Joy wad ..... law s(ammiiL MY Commission Expires:Flor y November 26, 1969'pytiliState off ida At Large. c - r 14 Ft o '11CF) r,.)Llb c i th itern r? -1 -_-1-7 43 mipson City Clerk Sill Real Estate Tax Information Show Me: 2002 Taxes ropey Taxg -- Today's Date: 03/31/2003 Last Update: 03/27/2003 Tax Year: 2002 Folio Number: 01 02030901010 MIAMI Search By: Owner's Name: FOMACK REALTY CORP eec em Property Address: 615 SW 2 AVE Detail Tax Information: Real Estate Tax Info 2002 Taxes Prior Years Taxes Due 2002 Non -Ad Vaiorem 2002 Back Assessments 2002 Enterprise Folio 2002 Historical Abatements 2003 Quarterly Payments Total Value : 1501000 Exemptions: None Gross Total Taxes: City Tax City Non Advalorem State & County Tax Millage Code: 0100 15112.07 461.00 25145.51 Total Gross: 40718.58 2002 Taxes are in paid status. Payments Applied To 2002 Taxes: MI/ on�ac pr miam (305 Down 140 W R Miam South 10710 R Miam Off M 8:30 a Date Applied Register/Receipt Amount Paid e a Ta 03/26/2003 0019/0000287 40718.58 Prope Florida Re Amounts due are subject to change without notice Property Tax Home I Real Estate Tax Info 12002 Taxes I Prior Years 1 2002_Non-Ad V 2002 Back Assessments X2002 Enterprise Folio 12002 Historical Abatements I 2003 Quarte Miami -Dade Home I Using Our Site I About I Phone Directory I Privacy I Disclaim © 2002 Miami -Dade County. All rights reserved. E-mail your comments, questions and suggestions toWebmaster S,,u,b fitted �n O the pl.lbllr, Priscilla A. TfIr_mpS_06 City Clerk http://egvsys.miamidade.gov:1608/wwwsery/ggvt/txcaw02.dia?folio=0102030901010 3/31/2003 x3/25/2003 17:20 203488P' S5 STOPER PAGE 02 JO NT WRITTEN CONSENT OF TRE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND THE STOCKHOLDERS OF FOM,kCK REALTY CORPORATION Pursuant to Sections 141(f) and 228 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the "Code"), the undersigned members of the Board of Directors (the "Board") of Fornack Realty Corporation (the "Corporation"), and the undersigned holders (the "Stockholders") of at least a majority of the Corporation's outstanding stock entitled to vote on the matters addressed herein, do hereby consent to and adopt the following resolutions, which shall have the same farce and effect as if taken and adopted at a meeting of the Board and a meeting of the Stockholders, in each case, duly galled and held. WHEREAS, the Board deems it advisable, expedient and for the best interests of the Corporation and the Stockholders to sell that certain 2.2 acre parcel of land located at the intersection of Southwest 74' Street and. I" ,.Avenue, Miami, FL to NEG 11, LLC, a limited liability company organized under the laws of the State of Florida, for a cash purchase price of seven million U.S. dollars (U$S 7,000,000) (the "Sale "), substantially in accordance with that certain Land Acquisition Term Sheet (tire "Tenn Sheet") attached hereto as Exhibit A, as the same may be modified in accordance with these resolutions; and W1WREAS, the Stockholders, having been duly made aware of the foregoing determination by the Board, and having read and understood the Term Sheet, deem it to be in their best interests, and in the best interests of the Corporation to approve, authorize and affirm the effecting of the Sale substantially in accordance with the Term Sheet, as the same may be modified in accordance with these resolutions. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board hereby unanimously approves, authorizes and affirms, and recommends to the Stockholders that they approve, authorize and affirm, the effecting of the Sale substantially in accordance with the Term Sheet, as the same may be modified in accordance with these resolutions; FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Stockholders hereby approve, authorize and affirm the effecting of the Sale substantially in accordance with the Term Sheet, as the same may be modified in accordance with these resolutions; FURTHER RESOLVED, that pursuant to and in accordance with Sections 141(f), 228 and 229 of the Code, the Board and the Stockholders hereby waive any and all requirements of the Code, the Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation and the Bylaws of the Corporation, with respect to notice; FURTHER RESOLVED. that the officers of the Corporation are, and each hereby is, authorized, empowered and directed to negotiate the Tenn Sheet and the definitive terms and conditions of the Sale and any and all attendant agreements, contracts, letters, .memoranda, amendments, certificates, instruments, forms, and other documents that they deem necessary, desirable and/or appropriate in order to consummate the Sale (the "Sale Documents"), making 173190\114341 N 563343 1 4121!02 3:114 PM `_i kn`S 4 t n publi Prisc4a a A. T o pF-on 3 �. 814 - City Geek 133!26/2003 17:20 203438V—,5 STORER PAGE 03 such modifications to the. Term Sheet and the Sale Documents as they may deem necessary, desirable and/or appropriate, and upon completion of such negotiations and modifications, to sign, execute, seal, verify, acknowledge, accept, amend, consent to, attest to, certify, deliver, file and/or record, as applicable, each and all of the Sale Documents and the Term. Sheet on behalf of the Corporation; FURTHER RESOLVED, that the officers of the Corporation are, and each hereby is, authorized and directed to take any aiid all other actions that they deem necessary, desirable and/or appropriate in order to (a) perform the Corporation's obligations and duties under the Term Sheet and the Sale Documents, and (b) carry out the full intent and purpose of and to consummate the actions contemplated by these resolutions; and FURTHER RESOLVED, that all actions previously taken by any officer or director of the Corporation in furtherance of the Sale and these resolutions are hereby ratified, affirmed, approved and adopted. IN W]<'JCNESS WHEREOF, the Corpora 'on duly caused this Written Consent to be executed by the undersigned effective as of a1 , 2002, DIRECTORS: Dorothy DeQA2Y gown STOCKHOLDERS: " i�i JI /6,26 Dorothy D96r?ey Brown ce L.�r James Webster Brown \73190kl 1434«/ 563541 v 1 arzzmx scow 1M Teresa Brown Storer Teresa Brown Storer Doma Brown Dolan 03" 1:x:1. City Clerk 03" 1:x:1. 03/26/2063 17:20 203488f-'-5 STORER PAGE 04 such modih.cations to the Term Sheet and the Sale Documents as they may deem, necessary, desirable and/or appropriate, and upon completion of such negotiations and modifications, to sign, execute, seal, verify, acknowledge, accept, amend, consent to, attest to, certify, deliver, file and/or record, as applicable, each and all of'the Sale Documents and the Tenn Sheet on behalf of the Corporation; FURTHER RESOLVED, that the officers of the Corporation are, and each hereby is, authorized and directed to take any and all other actions that they deem necessary, desirable and/or appropriate in order to (a) perform the Corporation's obligations and duties under the Term Sheet and the Sale Documents, and (b) carry out the full intent and purpose of and to consummate the actions contemplated by these resolutions; and FURTHER RESOLVED, that all actions previously taken by any officer or director of the Corporation in furtherance of the Sale and these resolutions are hereby ratified., affirmed, approved and adopted. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corpora on as duly caused this Written Consent to be executed by the undersigned effective as of f , 2002. DIRECTORS: Dorothy DeOrsey Brown Teresa Brown Storer Bruce L. Brown Douria Brown Dolan STOCKHOLDERS: Dorothy DeOrsey Brown Teresa Brown. Storer Bruce L. Brown Donna Brown. Dolan 4024/02 9:01 PM prisdia City 03- 8 t S W 7 STREET AND 1 AVENUE SD-7/CENTRAL BRICKELL RAPID TRANSIT COMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT Per City Code, Chapter 36. Construction Equipment Request for waiver of noise ordinance while under construction for continuous pours. Per CITY CODE, Chapter 23-5a, Request for a Certificate of Appropriateness for ground disturbing activity in an Archeological Conservation Area. MUSP, per Article 17, Section 1701, any residential development involving in excess of two hundred dwelling units. MUSP, per Article 17, Section 1701, any single use or combination of uses requiring or proposing to provide in excess of 500 offstreet spaces. The Major Use encompasses the following special permit: Class II Special Permit as per Article 15, Section 1514, for any development on property adjacent to the Miami River. Class II Special Permit as per Article 7, Section 607.3.1, for temporary construction fence within in the SD -7 overlay district. Class II Special Permit as per Article 7, Section 607.3.1, for development of new construction within the SD -7 overlay district. Class II Special Permit to request a waiver of Guides and Standards to omit and reduce the five feet border in the periphery landscaped area. Class II Special Permit as per Article 9, Section 922.3, a request to reduce one of the loading space dimensions from 12x 55 to 12 x 35. Q, 4 Info the PUblic' } 4 µ connection with ZL; Z -I on 7 -/7-a3 Priscilla A. Thompson 0 3 — 11City Clerk Class II Special Permit as per Article 9, Section 922.3, a request to reduce the required backup dimension for offstreet loading requirements. CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT, as per Article 4, Section 401, for a temporary construction fence and covered walkway; CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 920.1, to allow a construction trailer and watchman's quarters; Class I Special Permit as per Article 9, Section 915.2, for FAA clearance letter. Class I Special Permit as per Article 9, Section 925.3.8, to allow development/construction/rental signage. Class I Permit as per Article 9, Section 918.2, for parking and staging of construction during construction. Class I Permit as per Article 9, Section 920.1, to allow a trailer for construction and other temporary office uses such as leasing and sales. Class I Special Permit as per Article 9, Section 906.6, for pool/outdoor recreation area. Class I Special Permit as Article 9, Section 917.1.2, to allow valet parking for residential and other uses. CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT as per Article 9, Section 920.1, to allow a construction trailer and watchman's quarters; REQUEST that the following MUSP conditions be required at the time of Temporary Certificate of Occupancy or Final Certificate of Occupancy instead of at issuance of foundation permit: c McPhee oning Inspector II `D Date SubrMtt--d' IrItO the public a f.i. iten') p2-. e $ 7.-I"7 --63 Prisd le A. Thompson _,- City Clerk NEO VERTIKA a mixed use project DIRECTORY OF PROJECT PRINCIPALS Owner: Fomack Realty Corporation 11 Grove Avenue Branford, CT 06405 Contact: Teresa Storer Developer: NEO Concepts, LLC 3375 SW 3rd Avenue Miami, FL 33145 (305) 285-1418 Contact: Lizette Calderon Architect: Revuelta Vega Leon, P.A. 2560 S.W. 27`" Avenue Miami, Florida 33133 (305) 529-1080 Contact: Luis Revuelta Landscape Architect: Alex Knight & Associates 2199 Ponce de Leon Ste 302 Coral Gables, Florida 33134 Tel. (305) 441-1105 Fax (305) 441-6511 Contact: Alex Knight Traffic: Corradino Group 4055 NW 97 Avenue Miami, Florida 33178 (305) 594-4449 Contact: Joe Corradino Economist: Sharpton Brunson & Company 1 S.E. 3rd Avenue Suite 2100 Miami, FL 33131 Telephone: (305) 374-1574 Facsimile: (305) 372-8161 Contact: Darryl Sharpton Legal: Bilzin Sumberg Baena Price & Axelrod LLP 200 South Biscayne Boulevard, Suite 2500 Miami, Florida 33131-5340 Telephone: (305) 374-7580 Facsimile: (305) 374-7593 Contact: A. Vicky Garcia -Toledo, Esq. Submitted Into the public -d in connectlo ra 1rZ- 1 on Priscilla A. Thernw . ._ t City Clerk 03-- 81.11 Site Location/Address The address is S.W. 7t With Frontage of Approximately: 250 feet on SW 7 Street 250 feet on Miami River 3 85 Feet on 1St Avenue Legal Description: NEO VERTIKA a mixed use project PROJECT DATA: St Florida Lots 1 thru 5 and the Easterly 250.00 feet of Tract "A", Block 39S, and Lots 16, 17, 20, and 21, Block 39S, of Amended Plat of Block 39 South, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat book 42, at Page 6, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida, and the East 100.00 feet of Lots 18 and 19, Block 39S, City of Miami, according to the plat thereof recorded in plat Book B at Page 41, of the Public records of Miami -Dade County, Florida; and all of that portion of land lying North of said East 250 feet of Tract "A" to the Miami River as it now exists; said portion also included in legal description shown in Warranty Deed recorded in OR Book 5788, Page 34, dated 20 November, 1967. Site Data Zoning District SD-7(Central Brickell Rapid Transit Commercial -Residential District) Flood Zone Flood Zone "VE" (EL 9.00 N.G.V.D.) Density 200 Units / Acre = 444 Units Max. Site Area in Square Ft. 96,653 S.F. Site Area Acres 2.22 Acres Lot Area Total Net Lot Area Center Line of 1St Avenue Center Line of 7t" Street River (90'- 0') Public Transport (90'-0') TOTAL ADDITIONAL AREA TOTAL GROSS LOT AREA 96,653 S.F. 9,728 S.F. 6,243 S.F. 22,380 S.F. 35,328 S.F. 73,868 S.F. 170,521 S.F. F.A.R. Allowed: 170,521 S.F. X 6.0 (Residential) _ Allowed: 170,521 S.F. X 2.25 (Commercial) _ MAX F.A.R. _ ( 2.22 Acres) (3.91 Acres) Submitted Into the public 1,023,126 SF neccrd in connection wl 4t'3 383,672 SFPZ _ i on x an,_03 1,406,796 SF Priscilla A. i`horripZ44110 City Cierk 03— 811 SETBACKS FRONT PEDESTAL: TOWER: REQUIRED PROVIDED 15'-0" 15' 15'-0" 106-0" REAR PEDESTAL:(As per Charter) 50'-0" 50'-9" (Nearest Point to PL) TOWER: (As per Charter) 50'-0" 50'-9" (Nearest Point to PL) SIDES PEDESTAL EAST: (As per Charter) 30'-6" 30'-6" (View Corridor) PEDESTAL WEST: (As per Charter) 32'-0" 32'-0" (View Corridor) TOWER EAST: (As per Charter) 30'-6" 30"-6" (View Corridor) TOWER WEST: (As per Charter) 32'-0" 35'- 3" (View Corridor) BUILDING HEIGHT NUMBER OF STORIES HEIGHT ABOVE MAIN ROOF: 29'-6" PARKING DATA REQUIRED PARKING 443 UNITS X 10 SPACES / UNITS COMMERCIAL SPACES TOTAL REQUIRED PROVIDED PARKING LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4 LEVEL 5 LEVEL 6 TOTAL MAX PROVIDED Unlimited 371'-4" N.G.V.D. 33 Stories 443 SPACES 19 SPACES 462 SPACES 28 SPACES 97 SPACES 112 SPACES 117 SPACES 117 SPACES 104 SPACES 575 SPACES (12 HANDICAP SPACES) LOADING (BASED ON 872,224 S.F. GROSS AREA) REQUIRED = (4) 12 X 35 and (1) 12 X 55 PROVIDED = (6) 12x35 Submitted Into the public record in connection with ibti k —1 on 2 Priscilla A. Thompson City Clerk AREA BREAKDOWN LEVEL LEVEL/DESCRIPTION F.A.R. AREA GROSS AREA # OF UNITS 1 PARK LEVEL 1 /COMMERCIAL 24,678 SF 56,657 SF 0 2 PARKING LEVEL 2 8,282 SF 55,287 SF 3 3 PARKING LEVEL 3 5,710 SF 55,287 SF 3 4 PARKING LEVEL 4 7,039 SF 54,899 SF 3 5 PARKING LEVEL 5 7,039 SF 54,899 SF 5 6 PARKING LEVEL 6 7,043 SF 54,899 SF 5 7 AMENITIES LEVEL 947 SF 55,644 SF 0 8 RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 8 18,739 SF 22,483 SF 31 9 RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 9 15,559 SF 17,900 SF 11 10 RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 10 18,739 SF 22,488 SF 31 11 RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 11 15,127 SF 17,120 SF 9 12 RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 12 18,739 SF 22,488 SF 31 13 RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 13 15,127 SF 17,120 SF 9 14 RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 14 18,739 SF 22,488 SF 31 15 RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 15 15,127 SF 17,120 SF 9 16 RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 16 18,739 SF 22,488 SF 31 17 RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 17 15,127 SF 17,120 SF 9 18 RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 18 18,737 SF 22,954 SF 31 19 RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 19 12,146 SF 14,098 SF 0 20 RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 20 18,737 SF 22,954 SF 31 21 RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 21 12,146 SF 14,098 SF 0 22 RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 22 18,737 SF 22,954 SF 31 23 RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 23 12,146 SF 14,098 SF 0 24 RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 24 18,737 SF 22,954 SF 31 25 RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 25 12,146 SF 14,098 SF 0 26 RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 26 17,093 SF 22,954 SF 24 27 RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 27 11,376 SF 12,285 SF 0 28 RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 28 17,093 SF 21,877 SF 24 29 RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 29 11,376 SF 12,253 SF 0 30 RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 30 17,093 SF 21,877 SF 24 Submitted ed `Iynt tete-p-ubllc record Priscilla A. City Ci :,l,dk 31 RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 31 11,376 SF 12,253 SF 0 32 RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 32 17,093 SF 21,877 SF 24 33 RESIDENTIAL LEVEL 33 11,376 SF 12,253 SF 0 GRAND TOTALS 467,906 SF 872,224 SF 443 Submitted Into the public_ record in connection with itieal'l � -1�on 7 -1? -03 Priscilla A. Tho` n som City clerk 03— s l 7/,: NEO VERTIKA a mixed use project MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT PROJECT DESCRIPTION ARTICLE II. Description A. Zoning Ordinance No. 11000 2. 93 \75412\18112\ # 612877 v 5 3/31/03 2:59 PM Section 1304.2.1 Application forms; supplementary materials Section 1702.2.1 General Report Section 1702.2.2 Major Use Special Permit Concept Plan 12 Submitted Into the public L,e-ord in connection with itarl -( on7-17-i3_ Priscilla A. Thomfj,.,;,)n 03— 811 City Clerk NEO VERTIKA a mixed use project 690 S.W. 1 Avenue, Miami, FL 33130 MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT PROJECT DESCRIPTION Zoning Ordinance No. 11000 11. Section 1304.2.1 Application forms; supplementary materials (a) Statement of ownership and control of the proposed development of activity. The Disclosure of Ownership and Ownership Affidavit are provided in Article I. (b) Statement describing in detail the character and intended use of the development of activity. The Neo Vertika is a mixed use project comprised of 443 residential units with ancillary retail use at ground level along the Miami River frontage, as well as along S.W. 7`h Street. The site is designated as an SD -7 Zoning District and the land use density allows up to 200 units per acre of density. The project as proposed calls for a podium containing the parking and service areas. The Miami River frontage is dedicated to retail/restaurant space to enhance the City of Miami's commitment to Riverwalk. The project respects and allows for the required public spaces along the Miami River, the improvement of the site with •a continuation of the Riverwalk and incorporates indoor restaurant space with outdoor restaurant seating areas in order to compliment and enhance the pedestrian pathway of the Riverwalk. The same effort is made along S.W. 71h Street frontage creating retail space with hope of creating and developing a strong urban fabric along city streets and neighborhoods. Above the podium is a residential tower with units designed with the air of an industrial building converted to residential lofts. The building design is an effort to create Miami's own industrial fagade by combining traditional industrial finishes such as cement and steel to create "Miami's Own" industrial look. The project will include an extensive amenities deck and other leisure spaces to satisfy all the needs of the building's residents. \75412\18112\ # 612877 v 5 13 4/3/03 4:48 PM d Nn' the puNic Ya• v 0...y v' .� •�. j� �l d 03- 8 1 1 .. (c) General location map, showing relation of the site or activity for which special permit is sought to major streets, schools, existing utilities, shopping areas, important physical features in and adjoining the project or activity and the like. The following exhibits are included with the Major Use Special Permit Application and are located under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (i) Location Map: Map of the surrounding street system indicating the project location. (ii) Area Context Map: Map of the project area indicating buildup in the surrounding area. (iii) Aerial: Aerial Photograph of the surrounding area indicating the project site. (d) A site plan containing the title of the project and the names of the project planner and developer, date, and north arrow and, based on an exact survey of the property drawn to a scale of sufficient size to show: The Site plan is located under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. i. Boundaries of the project, any existing streets, building, watercourses, easements and section lines; The boundaries of the project and the location of existing streets are shown on the survey located under Tab 5 of the Supporting Documents. ii. Exact location of all buildings and structures; The exact location of all existing buildings located on the Property is shown on the survey located under Tab 5 of the Supporting Documents. The location of the building to be constructed are shown on the Site Plan, under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. iii. Access and traffic flow and how vehicular traffic will be separated from pedestrian and other types of traffic; Service vehicles will access the loading docks from the service entrance. \75412\18112\# 612877 v 5 ref�ivre d ® ash E t , 3/31/03 2:59 PM 14 item_ ` . Thompson City Clerk — N 1. -1. (1) Off-street parking and off-street loading area; Off-street parking will be provided in the parking garage located in the podium of the building adjacent to the retail space and below the residential tower. All parking levels will have access from ground floor ramps. The parking garage will consist of six levels of parking decks. The loading berth are internally located within the building and are part of the parking structure. Some of the berths will be reduced in size through Class II special permit. (2) Recreational Facilities; Location and access to recreational facilities can be found under Tab 6 of the supporting documents. (3) Screens and buffers; Landscaping areas indicated in the landscape plans under Tab 6 of the supporting documents. (4) Refuse collections areas; Waste collection will be provided by a containerized compactor system located in the service area. These facilities are shown on the Site Plan under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (5) Access to utilities and points of utilities hookups. Access and connections to site utilities are discussed in the Site Utility Study located under Tab 3 of the Supporting Documents. (e) Tabulations of total gross acreage in the project and the percentages thereof proposed to be devoted to the permitted uses and ground coverage. 45.3% of the allowable total FAR The various permitted uses. Maximum permitted footprint: 60,027 sf. Building Footprint: 56,657 gross square feet \75412\18112\ # 612877 v 5 15 3/31/03 2:59 PM <> P2 - ! LM -1 - P,? ii. Ground coverage by structures. Ground coverage by the structures is 33.2% of the total gross lot area. (f) Tabulation showing: The derivation of numbers of off street parking and off street loading spaces shown in (d) above: The total amount of parking spaces provided: 575 spaces ii Total project density in dwelling units per acre. Allowed: 2.22 acres x 200 units per acre = 444 units Proposed 443 residential units (g) If common facilities (such as recreation areas of structures, private streets, common open space, etc.) are to be provided for the development, statements as to how such common facilities are to be provided and permanently maintained. A recreational deck will be provided with a pool and other recreational amenities, along with, a fitness center with exercise room, lockers and sanitary facilities. Outdoor recreation deck areas for lounging and sunning will have splendid views of the Miami River and city's skyline. These common areas will be maintained by a Condominium Association. (h) Storm drainage and sanitary sewerage plans. Storm drainage, water distribution, wastewater and solid waste generation provisions are discussed in the Site Utility Study located under Tab 3 of the Supporting Documents. (i) Architectural definitions for buildings in the development; The design plans are included under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. 0) Landscaping plan, including types, sizes and locations of vegetation and decorative shrubbery, and showing provisions for irrigation and future maintenance. The Landscaping Plan located on under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents, specify the plant types, sizes and locations, as well as indications that all planted areas will be fully irrigated and maintained by the project. (k) Plans for recreation facilities, if any, including location and general description of buildings for such use. Recreational facilities are located under Tab 6. \75412\18112\# 612877 v 5 16 Submitted Wo the r 3/31/03 2:59 PM p2-1 (A'�7-l7-o.2 P., 71— C, s ° 03— 81_1 (1) Such additional data, maps, plans, or statements as may be required for the particular use or activity involved. The Drawings submitted with this Application are located under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (m) Such additional data as the applicant may believe is pertinent to the proper consideration of the site and development plan. Elevations depicting the architectural character of the project are included under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. 12. Section 1702.2.1 General Report. (a) Property ownership or ownerships and beneficial interest within the boundaries of the area proposed for Major Use Special Permit. Statement of Ownership and beneficial interest within the boundaries of the area proposed for Major Use Special Permit are provided in Article 1. (b) The nature of the unified interest or control. The nature of unified interest or control is indicated in Article 1. (c) Survey of the proposed area showing property lines and ownership. A copy of the survey of the Property is included under Tab 5 of the Supporting Documents. (d) Map of existing features, including streets, alleys, easements, utilities lines, existing land use, general topography, and physical features. The existing site features and utility lines are shown on the survey of Property located under Tab 5 and the Site Utility Study located under Tab 3 of the Supporting Documents. In addition, the surrounding street systems are included under Tab 2, Traffic Impact Study. (e) Materials to demonstrate the relationship of the elements listed in (d) preceding to surrounding area characteristics. The Drawings Submitted with this Application are located under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. Materials will be presented to the Urban Design and Review Board. \75412\18112\# 612877 v 517 'f kk?rd Into +h?! �1 pMff. a 3/31/03 2:59 PM rte: 1 4 _ke %-^...� �' City CSC (f) Existing zc ig and adopted comprehensive plan de. _.cations for the area on and around the lands proposed for Major Use Special Permit. The existing zoning designation for the Property pursuant to City of Miami Ordinance No. 11000, as Amended is SD -7, Central Brickell Rapid Transit, Commercial -Residential District. The Zoning Atlas Map on page 36 indicates the existing and surrounding zoning districts. The comprehensive plan future land use designation for the Property is "Restricted Commercial". The zoning and comprehensive plan designation are consistent with one another. 13. Section 1702.2.2 Major Use Special Permit Concept Plan. (a) Relationships of the concept plan to surrounding existing and proposed future uses. Activities, systems and facilities (transportation, recreation, view corridors, pedestrian systems, services systems and similar uses). Article II contains a written narrative of the Project outlining proposed uses, activities and architectural character. This narrative also contains descriptions of the Project's relationship to traffic, pedestrian movements, and transportation access. Maps located on Tab 6 indicate the Project's relationship to surrounding streets, land uses and functions. Building elevations, sections and perspectives showing the proposed materials, vertical profile and height, and orientation to streets is included in the Drawings Submitted with this Application. The list of Drawings Submitted is found under Tab 6 of the Supporting Documents. (b) Existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan principles and designations. The Project conforms to the SD -7 zoning for this Property. The comprehensive plan future land use designation conforms to the land use designation currently in effect for this Property. Set back requirements under the Code are satisfied or superseded for the proposed project on 14. Section 1702.2.3 Developmental Impact Study. (a) A traffic analysis shall be submitted for an area within approximately 1/4 mile of the site, or an area including the major intersections to be impacted by the site, whichever is larger. The Traffic Impact Analysis is included under Tab 2 of the Supporting Documents. (b) Economic impact data shall be provided, including estimates for construction costs, construction employment, and permanent employment. The Economic Impact Study is included under Tab 4 of the Supporting Documents. (c) A housing impact assessment. \75412\18112\ #f 612877 v 5 18 3/31/032:59 PM PZ"� e" ri&l as7t..a !k., T Y o psc,,3 5 City Clerk 03` 811 The project satisfies the need for market rate housing in the re -development of the West- Brickell area. (d) A description of proposed energy conservation measures shall be provided, including only those measures that are proposed in addition to the minimum requirements in State Energy Code. Architecturally, the building envelope will be comprised of insulated walls and roof. Extensive use of wall shading by means of landscaping and canopies will be implemented. Electrically, all exterior and landscape lighting will be controlled by means of time clocks and photocell switches. Energy saving lamps, ballasts and fixtures are being considered in all common areas. (e) Historic buildings. There are no historic structures located on the Property. (f) Environmental zone. The Property is located within an environmental preservation district; a monitoring plan will be presented and followed during land disturbing activities. \75412\18112\#612877v5 19 -Uhlic 3/31/03 2:59 PM d 1-17-Q3 3 a. ':M fA. City CIS-�'r"-" NEO VERTIKA a mixed use project ARTICLE 111. Supporting Documents Tab 1 Minority Construction Employment Plan Tab 2 Traffic Impact Analysis Tab 3 Site Utility Study Tab 4 Economic Impact Study Tab 5 Survey of Property Tab 6 Drawings Submitted Submitted Into the public r �n`i a \75412\18112\ # 612877 v 5 20 Leri, � I C " , 3/31/03 2:59 PM Leri, far Priscilla "A City c;nk MINORITY CONSTRUCTION EMPLOYMENT PLAN 1. Construction Plan for Minority Equal Opportunity Employment a. Goal. The intent of applicant is to provide employment and economic opportunity for the unemployed and economically disadvantaged residents of Miami. This will be achieved during the various stages of the Project such as application of permit period; construction period; and final operation and management of the finished Project. b. Background. The applicant of this Project, as with other projects, promotes and encourages equal employment opportunities for minorities. The same efforts of utilizing a minority labor force in the City of Miami will be used on this Project. C. Plan. The applicant has an Equal Employment Opportunity Plan that will be adhered to by all firms involved in the planning, construction, and management and operation of this Project. The following sources will be helpful in promoting equal employment opportunities for this Project. Florida Department of Commerce, Division of Economic Development Florida Department of Transportation The National Association of Minority Contractors The National Minority Supplier Development Council \75484\18280\ # 617886 v 1 3/31/03 10:12 AM e Ps recod ', �annection 3��,` item f"L -1 on 747 -a? Priscilla A. Thompson -- City Clerk 0v- 6 .11LI Minority Construction Employment Plan Page 3 2. Minority Contractor/Subcontractor Equal Employment Plan a. Goal. To promote economic opportunities for minority contractors and vendors in the City of Miami. b. Background.. The applicant's intent is to pursue his successful past practices of hiring qualified minority construction contractors and subcontractors in every phase of the construction and management of the project. 3. The Applicant's Policy Statement for Equal Employment Opportunity Purpose To ensure that the company's personnel policies and practices are administered equally and without regard for race, color, religion, sex, age, national origin, handicap, or veteran status. Policy a. All employees and job applicants are guaranteed equality of employment opportunity. This means that we will not discriminate against any worker or applicant on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, age, national origin, handicap, or veteran status. b. All recruitment, selection, placement, training, and layoff decisions made by the Company's supervisors or managers will be based solely on candidates job- related qualifications and abilities. \75412\18112\ # 617973 v 1 3/31/03 10:12 AM L Z A. city clerk 03- 81.E Minority Construction Employment Plan Page 3 c. All employees who apply for a promotion or transfer will be given equal consideration for a promotion or transfer. Assuming that an opening exists, the qualifications of a candidate for a promotion or transfer will be assessed solely on the basis of the individual's ability and merit (as demonstrated by the applicant's performance record). d. All other personnel policies and practices of the Company, including compensation, benefits, discipline, and safety and health programs, as well as social and recreational activities, will be administered and conducted without regard to any individual's race, color, religion, sex, age, national origin, handicap, or veteran status. e. The Company will establish special considerations to recruit, hire and ensure the advancement of qualified minority group members, women, handicapped individuals and veterans. f. The Company will take all necessary steps to ensure that each employee's work environment is free of unlawful discrimination or harassment based on race, color, religion, sex, age, national origin, handicap or veteran status. \75412\18112\ # 617973 v 1 3/31/03 10:12 AM hopublic P2 1 on _7 -V7- A. Tho p:LuF -- City C.ie-k NEO 11£gTIKA Tf2AFFIC IMPACT STUDY PIZEPARED BNr'. THE CORRADINO GROUP MARCH 2003 Submitted Into the Public record �n connecti pnvi"th her _7 n P? --J o n —on Priscilla A. Th mp. on Pri-z;r�'ill, A City Clerk 03- 811 NEO VERTIKA MUSP Traffic Analysis TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY....................................................................................................1 Existing (2003) PM Peak Hour Traffic Performance........................................................... l Future (2005) Traffic Performance.................................................................................. l Recommendations for Improvements..............................................................................1 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................ 2 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY...............................................................................2 TrafficPerformance......................................................................................................2 Geometric Configuration..............................................................................................2 AnalysisPeriods...........................................................................................................6 Turning Movement Counts............................................................................................6 TrafficGrowth Rate........................'..............................................................................6 TrafficSignal Data.......................................................................................................7 StudyLocations............................................................................................................7 Level of Service Standard.............................................................................................. 7 EXISTING (2003) TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE.......................................................................9 FUTURE (2005) TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE WITHOUT PROJECT.........................................1 1 FUTURE (2005) TRAFFIC CONDITIONS WITH PROJECT..................................................19 FUTURE (2005) TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE WITH PROJECT................................................24 CIRCULATION AROUND THE PROJECT SITE...................................................................24 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR IMPROVEMENTS.................................................................24 APPENDIX A — Traffic Counts APPENDIX B — Existing (2003) Level of Service Calculations APPENDIX C — Future (2005) Level of Service Calculation without the Project APPENDIX D — Future (2005) Level of Service Calculations with the Project Submitted Int® the public 0n 7-17-,03 r1 i��.j ick R.Thompson City Clerk JA3241 \Draft Report. DOC Page i 3/25/03 03- 8.1 .1 NEC) VERTIKA MUSP Traffic Analysis LIST OF FIGURES Figure1 - Project Location.........................................................................................................4 Figure 2 - Study Area....................................................................................................5 Figure 3 - Geometry .............................................. 8 Figure 4 - Roadway Network in Study Area..................................................................................9 Figure 5 - Existing (2003) PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes............................................................10 Figure 6 - Future (2005) PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes W/O Project...........................................18 Figure 7 - Future (2005) PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes with Project.............................................23 Figure 8 -Committed Trips...........................................:................................................12 Figure 9 - Project Distribution.......................................................................................14 LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Existing (2003) PM Peak Hour Intersection Performance...................................................7 Table 2: Cardinal Trip Distribution ... ..............................................................................1 1 Table 3: Future (2005) PM Peak Hour Intersection Performance W/O Project................................17 Table 4: Total Number of Project Trips.......................................................................... . .20 Table 5: NEC) II External Trip Generation..................................................................................21 Table 6: NEC) II Net New Trip Generation.................................................................................22 Table 7: Future (2005) PM Peak Hour Intersection Performance with Project..................................24 JA3241 \Draft Report. DOC 3/25/03 Submitted Into the record in item Q2 -1 "i `-1? ^03 Priscilla .tea 'Thorilp on, City Clerk 03— 811 NEO VERTIKA MUSP Traffic Analysis EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report summarizes the results of the traffic impact study for NEO II. The purpose of this study was to identify the traffic impacts associated with the project, which will be located at SW 7,h Street and SW 15} Court. The project will consist of 327 condominium units (850sf each) along with approximately 12,935 square feet of retail and 6,512 square feet of restaurant space on the first floor. The project will also provide on-site parking for 476 vehicles. The goal of this report is to present, for the study intersections, the existing conditions, the future traffic conditions without the project in 2005, and finally the future traffic conditions with the project. Existing (2003) PM Peak Hour Traffic Performance Traffic performance was calculated at two intersections in the vicinity of the project. Results of the existing conditions analysis indicate that the study intersections operate better than LOS E+. • The intersection of SW7'h Street and SW 15' Avenue is operating at LOS B • The intersection of SW 7th Street and SW 15' Court is operating at LOS A Future (2005' Traffic Performance The results of the analysis of future traffic conditions without the project indicate that with the addition of the natural growth in traffic and background traffic from other projects, the performance of the study intersection is expected to remain constant. • The intersection of SW71h Street and SW 15} Avenue will operate at LOS B • The intersection of SW 7'h Street and SW 1 Court will operate at LOS A The results of the analysis of future traffic conditions with the project indicate that conditions will not worsen significantly when project traffic is added, except on the northbound leg of the intersection at SW 15' Court. While this location's Intersections Capacity Utilization remains at LOS A the northbound leg begins to approach LOS F. A signal warrant analysis is recommended • The intersection of SW7'h Street and SW 15' Avenue will operate at LOS B • The intersection of SW 7'h Street and SW 151 Court is will operate at LOS A (northbound leg @ LOS F) Recommendations for Improvements In order to maintain LOS E+ or better at the intersection of SW 7,h Avenue and SW 15' Court a Signal Warrant Analysis is recommended to determine if the installation of a traffic signal is justified. JA3241 \Draft Report. DOC 3/25/03 03 e 5 a «mitis 4 p /A sora City Clerk NEO VERTIKA MUSP Traffic Analysis INTRODUCTION This report summarizes the results of the traffic impact study for NEO II. The purpose of this study was to identify the traffic impacts associated with the project, which will be located at SW 7'h Street and SW I` Avenue. The Project will consist of 327 condominium units (850sf each) along with approximately 12,935 square feet of retail and 6,512 square feet of restaurant space on the first floor. The project will also provide on-site parking for 476 vehicles. TRAFFIC ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY Traffic Performance Level of Service (LOS) is the traffic performance measure generally accepted in traffic analysis. Levels of service range from LOS A (free flow with negligible delays) to LOS F (heavily congested with long delays). LOS B, LOS C, LOS D and LOS E indicate intermediate conditions. Intersection levels of service were calculated using the Syncro software. This software replicates the procedures recommended in the Highway Capacity Manual. Required input for Syncro analyses include: • roadway geometry • turning movement volumes • traffic signal timing (cycle lengths and phasing) This project is located on SW 7'h Street, which is a State Road. As such, the Miami Dade County Public Works Department will not review the effort. This was confirmed by MDCPW. This study is under the purview of FDOT. A meeting was held with FDOT District 6 Traffic Operations Division to discuss the scope and methodology of the study. At this meeting it was decided that the project would be measured on how it affected the intersection at SW 7'h Street and SW 15' Court. Subsequently the signalized intersection at SW 7'' Street and SW I"Avenue was also analyzed. It was further decided at this meeting that all analysis would be done utilizing the Syncro software. In addition FDOT Traffic Operations will review this study. Their comments will be addressed. Geometric Configuration The existing geometry of the streets at the study intersections, were obtained through field review. Existing lane configuration is summarized in Figure 4. Geometry consists of: • SW 7'h Street and SW V Court is unsignalized. It is uncontrolled for westbound traffic and stop controlled for northbound and southbound traffic. 0 7'h Street is a westbound street containing three 1 1' travel lanes at both SW I"Avenue and SW 15' Court. • SW 1" Court northbound consists of one 8' parking lane, one 12' left turn lane and one 12' left turn and through lane. Southbound SW 15} Court is an unmarked dead end that primarily services the existing business on the site. It consist of one northbound lane and two southbound riaht turn lanes. : brn 'ttod i,nto the public 1\3241 \Draft Report.DOC 3/25/03 iter i • P2_1 on 1-11-63 3 L.losoijia A. Thor pso03- I City Clerk NEO VERTIKA MUSP Traffic Analysis SW I"Avenue consist on three southbound 1 1' travel lanes that enter the 7th Street intersection at an angle. This intersection is signalized.. There is one left turn lane, one left turn / through lane, and one through lane. ,J.V I bi �—VUIIt LULMMY mourn J:\3241\Draft Report. DOC 3/25/03 Submitted Into the ?public irem_� Pris alia A. ,. City Clerk 03— 81,1. 3 Ei 4 6 `fat r3.! agas°' i• - '' 1.� Fr. r ni:. ,- -%,t �' F k +es«'77 4 h°a dHRe+rMMAAY'• y�t� Sal Y t7e1 F Lif�.iiu 4 xi_ x i if �, .� r "� - sr - �. � f r9 ; •t ^'-� ^^".mow...`. `��+'a � +q '2 � _ mak," � '�"�""'^ :• .� ��. f'.:� � � x y�. -tN ' E x dµ P iaaz is r tPW t�70 Af low 21 z f V F q } I .�-.�---•_�_ ;=,ear.- -.8�, „r _? a � q5 'if 7� Y �. is M __ {� �`i..' . . ,. -. YI'N➢�liWMa ' C 3: 77 0002 m 40 r r rl Al i r r .- _\ a ^� T gg w a 4 ..o n, ..r r 1 ,£ 1 z { r TRA, ......... Jv a J 3 a 011 Ogg i rt 1 a t�F r _ 1 9 I . 4' J .r Pt { l Fxy vC7 'C Z d'd .,X.d 4- c'- tski i� FIGURE 2: Priscilla A. Thompson -`4 City Clerk STUDY AREA THE CORRADINO GROUP ENGINEERS PLANNERS ARCHITECTS CONSTRUCTION NEO VERTIKA MUSP Traffic Analysis Analysis Periods Traffic performance was calculated for the PM peak hour, as required for projects occurring within the area covered by the Downtown Miami Areawide Development of Regional Impact (Downtown Miami DRI). Turning Movement Counts Turning movement counts were obtained at the SW 7'h Street / SW l't Court intersection in February 2003. FDOT's peak season conversion factors were utilized to adjust the counts to represent peak season traffic conditions. A factor of 0.98 was applied. A peak hour factor of 0.94 was applied to these counts using standard HCM methodology. The counts obtained at SW 7'h Street and SW 15} Avenue were collected in 2002. A growth rate of 1.7% per year was utilized as recommended by FDOT. The turning movement counts collected for this project are included in Appendix A. Traffic Growth Rate Because the turning movement counts at SW 15' Avenue were obtained for this Project in 2002, it was necessary to determine the annual traffic growth rate in the study area to adjust the counts to reflect current and 2005 traffic conditions. The annual traffic growth rate was determined based upon historic traffic growth trends in the study area. Annual average daily traffic (AADT) volumes were obtained from the FDOT for several count stations in the study area including the following: • SW 8'h Street (Tamiami Trail eastbound) west of U.S. 1 (Brickell Avenue) • SW 7'h Street (Tamiami Trail westbound) west of U.S. 1 (Brickell Avenue) Analyses of historic volumes at these locations determined that a yearly growth factor of 1.7% is appropriate for the study area. The .017 annual growth factor was applied to the adjusted 2002 traffic volumes to determine peak season 2003 and 2005 traffic volumes in the study area. Therefore to grow existing traffic to 2005 the Syncro analysis received a growth factor of 1.034 for the intersection at SW 15' Court and 1.051 for SW 15} Avenue. (Counts at SW 151 Ave were taken in 2002) These volumes are presented in Figure 5. Submitted Into the public record in coin,,, ?F with item EL- I —Digi Priscilla A. Thompson City Clerk JA3241 \Draft Report. DOC 6 3/25/03 03— s t NEO VERTIKA MUSP Traffic Analysis Traffic Signal Data Traffic signal phasing information was collected from the computerized Miami -Dade County Traffic Signal Control System. The signal at SW 7h Street and SW 15' Avenue is County signal asset number 2240. In the PM Peak hour it is on pre -time #7, which begins at 3:30pm and ends at 6:30pm. This is on an 80second cycle. The westbound leg receives 33seconds of green time, 4 seconds of yellow time and 2 seconds of all red. The Southwest (southbound) leg receives 36seconds of green, 4seconds of yellow and 1 second of all red. Study Locations Traffic performance was calculated at the following intersections in the study area: • SW 7" Street at SW 1 ' Court (unsignalized) • SW 7" Street at SW 15i Avenue (signalized) Level of Service Standard The results of level of service calculations are compared against the established standards to determine the adequacy of traffic performance. Specifically, the peak hour level of service standard for the study area, as specified in the Downtown Miami DRI, is LOS E. However, 20% of roadway links or intersections are allowed to fall below LOS E "within the limitations of physical, historic or aesthetic constraints." Sul, M'A�`� R e.'EJB»o iternp��� - --` City Clerk 1\3241\Draft Report. DOC 7 3/25/03 aw Ol .a e >tir • `. {,,,-...�cnFF! t, E `i�@� • :>� a b r P -Ral$7.._�1 n."x .__. a +o ...L' as'f°,.,,,,,,,,,,,,�... A .,,ir.. k_ vo E, q Rrxrrsaasa±� +^>.•v.. -nra— •- ^} iY �' t "' � �.t 'a'^--w.�ii�� �„y'�d�t 5 A 77;1:1 :r - _ ' } '} r';UP FA jk s r" . Fri`, �Irs'. i, sc' e' it - e°i :, �,,W �4 i C "r..ii�i'.id, e` 1.,, :. ; r S-, '' ' (1 ^i4 '>•' y, 4,� .•-.rro ...P s;-� t+-v-.�'•'�v- � { �. f�+. }��� N�4� t:, ? ^" � ; �1�e�-I t1� °3"- /-/K * �, a "�',1"r" •.P t�� '�. ttr ;zi TSI ' vI J g _6y - '� .,...s'�F° .. �, f'i,�,-s e"x. n tt d!" i ��F� F��l` n.'� •y � 5 - �4 Fk ME "'"'P"5 y "...rW]" " G +' C Y• 6Jr t i it j�, i i a 4V �;rt+ fit•^u. ..y., -d �}1 dti, r L ?. .i) fLFA-�' t t Irk,25 77 122,: 'J( t � `t .. 00 MA � jf► �� "€'� �` cp ' ^jfic IC Fllzz� r A a . tF'ti '" �-�`4� �r. �.. s ;..:Yt ���•J 1 �� .1ii� � � ! <. f�'I > 1 � r .sy' y o f s z,y t - -� - NEO VERTIKA MUSP Traffic Analysis EXISTING (2003) TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE Traffic performance calculations were completed for the PM peak hour using the geometry illustrated in Figure 4 and the traffic volumes shown in Figure 5. Detailed intersection performance calculations are included in Appendix B, of which a summary is provided in Table 1. Table 1: Existing (2003) PM Peak Hour Intersection Performance Intersection Level of Service Volume/Capacity SW 7'h Street at SW 15' Court A 0.42 1 SW 7'h Street at SW 15' Avenue B 0.53 (1)Represents the Level of Service of the worst approach of a stop controlled intersection The intersection at SW 7'h Street and SW 15} Court is one-way westbound with three travel lanes. This approach handles a volume of 1691 through vehicles, and 3 right turns. The through lanes have a v/c of 0.42 and the right turn lane has a v/c of 0.21. Since there is no control on this approach there is no delay. Northbound handles about 59 left turns in two lanes. The worst approach has a v/c of 0.42. The delay on this approach is between 13 and 15 seconds, and it operates at LOS C. Southbound handles about 5 right turns. The v/c of this approach is 0.01 and there is a delay of 13 seconds. The approach operates at LOS B. The intersection at SW 7'h Street and SW 1't Avenue is signalized and operates at LOS B. It has three one-way westbound lanes that handle 1431 through vehicles and 83 left turns. The approach operates with a v/c of .75 and an average delay of 21.3 seconds and a LOS of C. Southbound operates as a one-way street with three lanes of traffic, one southbound, one southbound and eastbound, and one eastbound. These have a v/c of .32, a delay of 14.4, and a LOS of B. The existing conditions as analyzed in Syncro were converted to Corsim and a simulation was run. The simulation matches field observations of existing conditions. bw'n afi :ark a Ex $ £� 1\3241\Draft Report.DOC 9 3/25/03 03— 8 1 ©0 I I /• I I � • , Q � ------------------- -- `� -`-- --- --- �� ------- - a , a cn 771 if FIGURE 4: STUDY INTERSECTION GEOMETRY THE CORRADINO GROUP ENGINEERS PLANNERS ARCHITECTS CONSTRUCTION NEO VERTIKA MUSP Traffic Analysis FUTURE (2005) TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE WITHOUT PROJECT The calculation of future traffic performance without the Project has two purposes: • It is a necessary step to obtain the prevailing traffic conditions near the project site by the time NEO II is completed and occupied in 2005. • It helps isolate the impacts of the project traffic_ The growth in background traffic out to 2005 was first calculated utilizing the .017 annual growth rate, which was determined for the study area based upon historic growth trends. It was determined that additional traffic will be generated in the study area by several committed developments. It has been conservatively estimated from information obtained through a review of previous applications obtained from the City of Miami Planning Department that the traffic expected to be generated by the following developments should be considered committed: • Brickell Bay Plaza (1201 Brickell Avenue) • Brickell View (1200 S. Miami Avenue) • Mary Brickell Village (950 S. Miami Avenue) Such projects are within a reasonable perimeter of the study area and would have an effect on traffic in the area. Traffic volumes expected to be generated by the developments were extracted from the studies and added to the expected 2005 volumes. The resulting 2005 traffic volumes without the Project are illustrated in Figure 6. Brickell Bay Plaza, Brickell View and Mary Brickell Village are expected to generate 242 trips, 503 trips and 1062 trips respectively. Assuming a transit usage of 10% and pass -by rate capture rate of 40% the adjusted trips are 131, 272 and 573 trips. The 10% transit factor is used as a standard in the downtown Miami area. The calculated trips were then distributed and assigned on the roadway network using the distribution as obtained from the travel model. Trip Distribution In order to determine which roadways and intersections would be impacted by Project trips, it is necessary to determine their probable paths. The Miami Urban Area Transportation Study (MUATS) model is used to forecast future year trips on the transportation network in Miami -Dade County. Among other capabilities, the MUATS model provides origin -destination information for each area in the County. The Project trip distribution was based on a cardinal distribution provided by the MUATS model, which is provided below. Table 2: Cardinal Trip Distribution SUbm3i,f *d ,Info the 1\3241 \Draft Report. DOC 3/25/03 pris-dla A. The Cjty Cier 03— �.3 11 Cardinal Direction Percentage of Trips North — Northeast 22% East - Northeast 7% East — Southeast 1 % South - Southeast 1 % South — Southwest 8% West — Southwest 20% West — Northwest 21% North - Northwest 20% 1\3241 \Draft Report. DOC 3/25/03 pris-dla A. The Cjty Cier 03— �.3 11 NEO VERTIKA MUSP Traffic Analysis Total 100% JA3241 \Draft Report. DOC 3/25/03 S u b m iti stern; City Clerk 03-- 811 12 Figure 5: Existing Trips (2003) The Corradino Group 03- CID / LO <-- SW 7th Street 1691 <-1 431 , k 83 SW 7th Streel �R > Prisdi" A. 'i City bark Figure 5: Existing Trips (2003) The Corradino Group 03- NEO VERTIKA MUSP Traffic Analysis Trip Assignment Project traffic was routed through the study intersections and roadway segments during the PM peak hour based upon the cardinal trip distribution. In particular, the paths for inbound and outbound trips will differ because of the street network in the study area, which contains several one-way pairs. Project traffic was then added to the "background" traffic to yield future PM peak hour traffic volumes with the Project, which are illustrated in Figure 7. e� k J:\3241\Draft Report.DOC 1 4 3/25/03 SVV fi T • � i yta�l � � •Ilan' w ! i 77, c..5 r E • irk l L=_ t D __ FIGURE 8: COMMITTED PROJECT DISTRIBUTION THE CORRADINO GROUP ENGINEERS PLANNERS ARCHITECTS CONSTRUCTION • � i yta�l � � •Ilan' \ ! i c..5 r i • irk l -19 v � T ice) rel FIGURE 8: COMMITTED PROJECT DISTRIBUTION THE CORRADINO GROUP ENGINEERS PLANNERS ARCHITECTS CONSTRUCTION NEO VERTIKA MUSP Traffic Analysis Planned Roadway Improvements There is one specific roadway improvement scheduled for the Brickell area as listed in the Transportation Improvement Program. This is a safety project that will add dual eastbound left turning lanes from Coral Way to Brickell Avenue. It will not have an effect on NEO H The Brickell area is a densely populated residential area immediately south of Downtown Miami. It is serviced by arterial surface streets such as US -1 and Coral Way, expressways such as I-95 and transit such as a multitude of bus routes as well as the MetroRail and MetroMover. The combination of these makes the Brickell area arguably the most accessible residential area in the entire State of Florida. The MPO has over $5.4 Billion in scheduled transportation improvements designed to comprehensively cover a wide array of mobility options. This suggests that the County's mobility will be enhanced. Over the past decade as Miami -Dade County has become more congested, segments of the population have begun to seek alternative transportation options as a way to make mobility efficient. This has been reflected in a continued densification of the Brickell area, due to its central location and its proximity to transit. It is anticipated that this will only be enhanced by the County's exploration of transit, such as the Miami Intermodal Center, the Northeast Corridor Extension and the BayLink projects. In addition, the passage of the $0.005 sales tax for transportation improvements will vastly improve mobility Countywide through the provision of transportation alternatives. Immediate implementation has entailed a reduction of bus transit headways and an increase in fleet size. The Brickell area is positioned to be the direct and indirect beneficiary of this commitment to mobility. The result of which will be the removal of automobile trips from local streets and maintenance of adequate traffic flow. In general Miami -Dade County will be spending its 80% share of the $16 Billion tax (over 30 years) on the following types of projects. Bus Service Improvements 2003-2008 • Increase bus fleet from 700 to 1335 • Increase current service miles fro 27 million miles to 44 million miles • Increase operating hours from 1.9 million hours to 3.3 million hours • Provide 15 -minute or better bus service Rapid Transit Improvements 2003-2008 (Construction of up to 88.9 Miles of countywide rapid transit lines) • Technology and Corridor Improvements • Earlington Heights/ Airport Connector • Baylink • Kendal Corridor • Northeast Corridor • Rail Extension to Florida City • Douglas Road Extension Major Highway and Road Improvements 2003-2013 • Upgrade the County's Traffic signalization system • Construct maior ingress/eqress improvements in ubmitl ;,J Reptlon"? City Clerk downtown Miami, from SW 81" St. to SW 15' Avenue. Accelerate Program to provide ADA accessibility to bus stops throughout the county. Detailed intersection performance calculations for the expected future (2005) traffic conditions without the Project are included in Appendix C, of which a summary is provided in Table 3. JA3241 \Draft Report.DOC 3/25/03 03- 0011 16 NEO VERTIKA MUSP Traffic Analysis Table 3: Future (2005) PM Peak Hour Intersection Performance W/0 Project Intersection Level of Service Volume/Ca ocit SW 7" Street at SW 1" Court A 0.46 1 SW 7" Street at SW 1' Avenue B 0.55 (1) Worst approach The SW V Court intersection will have 1848 westbound throughs, 3 westbound right turns, 62 northbound lefts, and 5 southbound rights. The v/c worsens by .02. The delay increases to a maximum of 17 seconds up 1.5 seconds. The intersection capacity utilization is 54.7%, but the northbound leg operates at LOS C Land the southbound leg operates at LOS B. The SW 15} Street intersection has 1473 Westbound throughs, 333 southbound rights, and continues to operate at LOS B, with v/c of .55 and a delay of 19.7 seconds, an increase of .5 seconds. JA3241 \Draft Report. DOC 17 3/25/03 - Cierk JA3241 \Draft Report. DOC 17 3/25/03 Figure 7: Future Trips With Out Project (2005) The Corradino Group 0"0- 811 CO LO 1473 SW 7th Street 1848 :t,-85 lc�a U) a Rein A. on City CA�bfk Figure 7: Future Trips With Out Project (2005) The Corradino Group 0"0- 811 NEO VERTIKA MUSP Traffic Analysis FUTURE (2005) TRAFFIC CONDITIONS WITH PROJECT NEO II will consist of 327 condominium units along with approximately 12,935 square feet of retail and 6,512 square feet of restaurant space on the first floor. The project will also provide on-site parking for 476 vehicles. Traffic conditions were assessed for 2005, when the project would be fully completed and occupied. This project growth is added to the ambient growth of the area to determine the impact of the project. In order to estimate future traffic conditions with the project a three-step process is followed: Trip Generation - The number of trips generated at the project site is calculated Trip Distribution - The origins and destinations of the trips are estimated Trip Assignment - The project trips are then added to the traffic on the surrounding transportation network (expected future traffic) Trip Generation As mentioned previously, NEO II will consist of condominium units, retail and restaurant. The project will also provide on-site parking for 476 vehicles. The Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE's) Trip Generation manual (6'h Edition, 1997) provides average trip generation rates or equations for a variety of land uses. It was determined that the residential aspect of the project is most similar to ITE land use category 232, High -Rise Residential Condominium (PM Peak Hour of the Generator). ITE Trio Generation Formula Description ITE Land Use PM Peak Ins/Outs High -Rise 327 Units Hour Trip 84/40 Residential Generation Condominium Rate* High -Rise 232 0.38 68%/32% Residential (327) = 124.26 Condominium *Recommended PM peak Hour Trip Generations Rates were provided by the Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation, 6" Ed. The results of the calculations using the above equation and the proposed development intensity are summarized below. Residential Trips Description Scale Trip Ends Ins/Outs High -Rise 327 Units 124 84/40 Residential Trip Ends = Gen Condominium Rate (.38) x Number of Units (327) = 124.26 rc�c n x z Mia 9� items Prisdla A- T910 F Ps" _.__­____ city Clerk JA3241\Draft Report. DOC 19 3!25/03 3-- 811 NEC) VERTIKA MUSP Traffic Analysis The Project will also consist of approximately 12,935 square feet of retail on the first floor. The trip equation provided for ITE land use category 814, Specialty Retail Center (PM Peak Hour of Generator). ITF Trin ran,-mfinn Fnrmidn Description ITE Land Use PM Peak Ins/Outs Specialty 12,935 Hour Trip 36/28 Retail Center Generation Rate* Specialty 814 4.93/1000sf 57%/43% Retail Center gla *Recommended PM peak Hour Trip Generations Rates were provided by the Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation, 6`h Ed. The results of the calculations using the above equation and the proposed development intensity are summarized below. RPtnil Trin, Description Scale Trip Ends Ins/Outs Specialty 12,935 64 36/28 Retail Center Trip Ends = Gen Rate (4.93) x 1000 Quality 831 Square Feet (12.9) 62%/38% Restaurant 63.5 The Project will also consist of approximately 6,512 square feet of restaurant on the first floor. The trip equation provided for ITE land use category 831, Quality Restaurant (PM Peak Hour of Generator) ITF Trin (—,anPrntinn Fnrmuln Description ITE Land Use PM Peak Ins/Outs Quality 6,512 Hour Trip 37/23 Restaurant Generation Rate* Quality 831 9.02/1000sf 62%/38% Restaurant gfa *Recommended PM peak Hour Trip Generations Rates were provided by the Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation, 6" Ed. The results of the calculations using the above equation and the proposed development intensity are summarized below. Restaurant Trios Description Scale Trip Ends Ins/Outs Quality 6,512 60 37/23 Restaurant Trip Ends = Gen Rate (9.02) x 1000 Square Feet (6.5) JA3241\Draft Report. DOC 3/25/03 C,cc, Sx� a k s A6 a f'tl r 0;1 City Clerk 20 S Po 7 FIGURE 9: PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION THE CORRADINO GROUP ENGINEERS PLANNERS ARCHITECTS CONSTRUCTION NEO VERTIKA MUSP Traffic Analysis = 59.8 Tnhle 4: Total Number of Proiect Trips Land Use Units/Square Feet Tris In/Out High -Rise Condominium 327 124 84/40 Specialty Retail 12,935 sf 64 36/28 Quality Restaurant 6,512 sf 60 37/23 TOTAL 13 248 157191 A number of trips associated with the project can be expected to be internal to the site because of the Project's mixed-use nature. ITE's Trip, Generation Handbook pg 1-42 provides a methodology for estimating trip generation at multi -use developments. This methodology was utilized to calculate the internal capture rates for the project's different land uses. It was conservatively determined that approximately 20% of the project's trips would be internal to the site. Additionally, a number of trips associated with the project can be expected to utilize alternative modes of transportation. The project site is served by high quality transit service within walking distance including the Metrorail, Metromover and MDTA bus routes. Therefore, a 10% reduction in trip generation was made to account for alternative modes. This reduction is consistent with the projected daily mode split for the Brickell area provided in the Downtown Miami DRI. Finally, a number of trips that will access NEO II may already be utilizing roadways in the study area. These trips, which are known as pass -by trips, are made as intermediate stops on the way from an origin to a primary trip destination. Information on pass -by trips was also obtained from ITE's Trip Generation Handbook, which provides pass -by capture rates for various land uses. According to the Trip Generation Handbook, approximately 36% of the external trips associated with Project's retail components and 43% of the external trips associated with the project's restaurant component can be expected to be pass -by trips. Table 5 breaks down the project's expected external trip generation by land use. Table 5: NEO II External Trip Generation (1 10% of the Project's external trips were assumed to utilize alternative modes including transit (2) 20% Retail and Restaurant trips were assumed to be internal As shown above, the project can be expected to generate approximately 248 total trips during the PM peak hour. Approximately 25 of the trips can be expected to be internal to the site and 24 of the trips Sett''9 e 6 ti9_�3r6��• JA3241\DraftReport.DOC 21 3/25/03 1@?�.jZ," 1._. �.. 03— 811 PM Peak Hour Trips PM Peak Hour External Trips Land Use Total Internal Transit Entering Exiting Condominium 124 0 12 77 35 Retail 64 13 6 26 19 Restaurant 60 12 b 26 16 TOTAL 248 25 24 129 70 (1 10% of the Project's external trips were assumed to utilize alternative modes including transit (2) 20% Retail and Restaurant trips were assumed to be internal As shown above, the project can be expected to generate approximately 248 total trips during the PM peak hour. Approximately 25 of the trips can be expected to be internal to the site and 24 of the trips Sett''9 e 6 ti9_�3r6��• JA3241\DraftReport.DOC 21 3/25/03 1@?�.jZ," 1._. �.. 03— 811 NEO VERTIKA MUSP Traffic Analysis can be expected to utilize alternative modes such as transit. The remaining 199 trips will be external to the project site, with 129 entering and 70 exiting the site during the PM peak hour. Table 6 separates the pass -by trips from the total external trips accessing the project site to determine the net new trips that will be added to the roadways in the study area. Table 6: NEO II Net New Trip Generation Land Use Total External Trips Pass -By Trip % Pass -By Trips Net New Trips Entering Exiting Entering Exiting Condominiu m 77 35 - - 77 35 Retail 26 19 36% 16 22 17 Restaurant 26 16 43% 18 15 9 Total 114 61 As shown above The total number of trips that will be new to the roadways in the study area, will be 114 entering and 61 exiting the Project site. Trip Assignment Project traffic was routed through the study intersection during the PM peak hour based upon the cardinal trip distribution. In particular, the paths for inbound and outbound trips will differ because of the street network in the study area, which contains several one-way pairs. Project traffic was then added to the "background" traffic to yield future PM peak hour traffic volumes with the project, which are illustrated in Figure 7. J:\3241\Draft Report. DOC 3/25/03 Subrn,tittpd Into the public record P is i;a A tk p 42'.iu- I City clerk 03- 811 22 Figure 6: Future Trips With Project (2005) The Corradino Group 03- 811 CO COQ < 1848 CID <--1 493 SW 7th Street�Bk--85 C\l (0 NT (D > < ?>> S1.1bmitt".91d Into public record bn Pr i s G'I Sa i A,, 11 ah.,,.�tW9n City Cierk Figure 6: Future Trips With Project (2005) The Corradino Group 03- 811 NEC) VERTIKA MUSP Traffic Analysis FUTURE (2005) TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE WITH PROJECT The study intersection was analyzed for level of service on the basis of future traffic volumes with the project. Detailed intersection performance calculations are included in Appendix D, of which a summary is provided in Table 6. Table 7: Future 2005 PM Peak Hour Intersection Performance with Project Intersection Level of Service Volume/Capacity SW 7'h Street at SW 15' Court D+ 0.98 1 SW 7" Street at SW 15' Avenue B 0.57 (1 ) Represents the Level of Service of the worst approach of a two-way stop controlled intersection The SW I' Court intersection deteriorates dramatically when discussing the northbound approach. For vehicles attempting to cross the street there is a v/c of .98, a cue length of 126 feet, a control delay of 196 seconds, and a total approach delay of 129.8 seconds. This all adds up to LOS F for the northbound approach. Southbound has a delay of 15.3 seconds, a v/c of .09 and a LOS of C. Still the Intersection Capacity Utilization is at 56.4% or LOS A. A Signal Warrant Analysis is being recommended at this intersection. The SW I" Street intersection works well, maintaining its LOS B, with an average delay of 19.9 seconds, and a v/c of .57. CIRCULATION AROUND THE PROJECT SITE Access to the project site for residents and guests will be provided off of SW 15' Court. The main entry to the parking garage is approximately 175' north of the intersection. There exists a circular drop off area about 215' of the intersection. A service entrance will be provided on the west side of the site. Bounded by the Miami River to the north, this site can only be accessed from the south. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR IMPROVEMENTS With the growth in background traffic in addition to the project traffic generated, the performance of the SW 15' Court intersection is expected to deteriorate in the northbound approach. It is recommended that a Signal Warrant Analysis be performed at this intersection. Submitted Into the public record i item '7- _ct '7- 17-62 Priscilla A. T60rEi sOril Cite Clerk JA3241 \Draft Report. DOC 24 3/25/03 03- hit NEO VERTIKA MUSP Traffic Analysis APPENDIX A Traffic Counts JA3241\Draft Report. DOC 3/25/03 03- ,3 (� 4! J 8 1 1 The CORRADINO Group NEO Musp 3241 Traffic Counts 211212003 SW 7th Ave / SW 1 sl Ct Unsignalized PM PEAK 4-6p Start Time I Left IThrough IRIQht Peds 0.88 Through (Right I Peds [Total Total % 0 07 Through (Right I Peds [Total Total METRIC ENGINEERING 13940 S.W 136 Street Miami, Fl. 33186 Tel: 305-235-5098 Fax 305-251-5894 'zile Name : SW tat Ave & SW 7 St Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 07/02/2002 Page :1 08:00 0 SW 1st AVENUE 21 0 SW 71h STREET 16 118 SW 1st AVENUE 0 134 SW 7th STREET 0 0 0 0 0 0 Southbound 0 0 Westbound 201 201 Northbound 0 51 Eastbound 0 69 15 102 Slant 0 Thr Rig Ped I App. 0 Thr Rip Ped App. Left Thr Rip Ped App. lett Thr Rig Ped App. Exdu Mdu. Int. Time heft u ht I s Total Le(t u ht s Total 0 u M s Total 08:45 u ht s Total Total Total Total Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 222 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0 285 61 479 07:00 0 29 11 0 40 5 89 0 0 94 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 134 134 0715 0 29 17 0 46 10 81 0 0 91 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 137 137 07:30 0 27 1r 0 40 9 110 0 0 119 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 159 159 07:45 0 23 15 0 38 14 100 0 0 114 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 152 152 Total 0 108 56 0 164 38 380 0 0 4181 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 01 0 582 582 08:00 0 46 21 0 87 16 118 0 0 134 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 201 201 06:15 0 51 16 0 69 15 102 0 0 117 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 186 188 06:30 0 53 21 0 74 14. 128 0 0 142 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 216 218 08:45 0 58 17 0 75 16 131 0 0 147 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 222 222 Total 0 208 77 0 285 61 479 0 0 5401 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 825 825 "' BREAK"' 0 48 w 0 110 23 233 0 0 256 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 366 366 11:00 0 32 10 0 42 8 96 0 0104 285 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 146 146 11:15 0 25 7 0 32 7 91 0 0 98 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 130 130 11:30 0 23 8 0 31 10 99 0 0 109 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 140 140 11:45 0 31 12 0 43 11_ 85 0 0 96 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 139 139 12:00 0 35 15 0 50 11 101 0 0 112 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 162 162 12:15 0 33 17 0 50 16 113 0 0 129 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 179 179 12:30 0 20 20 0 40 12 112 0 0 124 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 164 164 1245 0 18 12 0 30 14 121 0 0 135 0 0 0 0 0_ 0 0 0 0 0 0 165 165 13:00 0 22 11 0 331 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 01 0 33 33 .. BREAK "' Total 0 22 11 0 331 0 0 0 0 ol 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -01 0 33 33 .• BREAK ... 16:00 0 59 67 0 126 25 226 0 0 251 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 377 377 16:15 0 48 62 0 110 23 233 0 0 256 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 366 366 16:30 0 64 56 0 120 20 265 0 0 285 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 405 405 16:45 0 55 88 0 123 26 323 0 0 349 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 472 472 Total 0 226 253 0 479 94 104 0 0 1141 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1620 1620 17:00 0 67 80 0 147 19 376 0 0 395 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 542 542 17:15 0 76 76 0 152 18 342 0 0 360 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 512 512 17:30 0 93 81 0 174 24 360 0 0 384 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 558 558 1 17:45 0 65 80 0 145 20 325 0 0 345 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 490 490 ' Total 0 301 317 0 618 81 140 0 0 1484' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2102 2102 Grand 0 108 815 0 1897 383 :412 0 0 4490 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8387 6387 Tota! 2 7 Apprch % 0.0 U 0 0.0 8.1 91. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total % 0.0 IS. 1 -9 0.0 29.7 5.7 6 0.0 0.0 70.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 Q 8 Approach totals Include peels ZIa2/(.y- 5�8� 210OZ31 qv , _'0 city 03-- 8.11 METRIC ENGINEERING 13940 S.W 136 Street Miami, FL 33186 Tel: 305-235-5098 Fax 305-251-5894 . ,te Name : SW 1st Ave & SW 7 St Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 07/02/2002 Page :2 Peak Hour O to 08:45 - Peak t of 1 SW let AV UE Southbound SW 7th TREET Westbau nd SW 1st AVENUE Northbound SW 7th STREET Eastbound Start Tkne Left . Thru Right Left Thru Right TOWleft 0 Thru Right Lett Thru Right Toctal Peak Hour O to 08:45 - Peak t of 1 0 0 0 670 0.0 0.0 0.0 Intersection 0 0 0 0 0 179 voe o 206 77 Mr 265 61 479 0 540 0 0 0 Percent 0.0 73A no 0 11.3 88.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 High IM. 08:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2102 Volume 0 58 17 75 16 131 0 147 0 0 0 Peak Factor 0.942 Peak How From 07:00 to 08:45 - Peak 1 of 1 By Approach 08:00 08:00 07:00 Vokims O 208 77 285 61 479 0 540 0 0 0 Percent 0.0 73.0 27.0 1i-3 . 88.7 0.0 - - - High Int. 08:45 08:45 06:45 Vokune 0 68 17 75 18 131 0 147 0 0 0 Peak Factor 0.950 0.918 4f Peak Hour From 11:00 to 12:45 - Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 12:00 im Voke 0 106 64 170 53 447 0 500 0 0 0 Percent 0.0 82.4 37.6 10.6 89.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 High IM. 12:15 Vokime 0 33 17 50 16 113 0 129 0 0 0 Peak Fads Peak Hour From 11:00 to 1245 - Peak 1 of 1 By Approach 11:45 1200 11:00 m Volue 0 119 64 183 53 447 0 500 0 0 0 Percent 0.0 65.0 35.0 10.6 89.4 0.0 - - - High Int. 1200 1245 1245 Volume 0 35 15 50 14 121 0 135 0 0 0 leak Factor 0.915 0.926 Peak Hour From 16:00 to 17:45 - Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 17:00 Volume 0 301 317 618 81 1403 0 1484 0 0 0 Percent 0.0 48.7 51.3 5.5 94.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 High K 17:30 Vdwne 0 93 81 174 24 360 0 384 0 0 0 Peak Factor Peak HoFrom d m 16:00 to 17:45 - Peak 1 1 w By Approach 17:00 16:45 16:00 Volurne 0 301 317 618 67 1401 0 1488 0 0 0 Percent MO 48.7 51.3 5.8 94.2 0.0 - - - High Int 17.30 17:00 17:00 Volurne 0 93 81 174 19 376 0 395 0 0 0 Peak Factor 0.868 i 0,942 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 825 0 222 0.929 07:00 0 0 0 0 0 06:45 0 0 0 '' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 670 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 179 0.936 11:00 0 0 0 0 0 12:45 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2102 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 558 0.942 16:00 0 0 0 0 0 17:00 - 0 0 0 0 0 a iii �iblic Cd. rc . 4-�"1 `$ •.c. City Clerk NEO VERTIKA MUSP Traffic Analysis APPENDIX B Existing (2003) Level of Service Calculations JA3241\Draft Report. DOC 2 3/25/03 03— 8 1 NEO MUSP 7th Street / SW 1 st Court Existing Conditions * 2/20/2003 Lane Configurations ttT+ *T rr Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 0 1725 3 60 0 0 0 0 5 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Hourly; flow rate (veh/h) 0 0 0 0 1798 3 63 0 0 0 0 5 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s), Percent Blockage Right.,turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) . VC, conflicting volume 1802 0 605 1802 0 1800 1800 601 VC 1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 tC, 2'stage (s) tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 p0 queue free % 100 100 83 100 100 100 100 99 cM capacity (veh/h) 338 1622 377 79 1084 50 79 443 Direction, Lane# WB;1 WB 2' WI3 3 NB 1. lVB 2 SB1-- SB 2 Volume Total 719 719 363 42 21 3 3 Volume Left 0 0 0 42 21 0 0 Volume Right 0 0 3 0 0 3 3 cSH 1700 1700 1700 377 377 443 443 Volume to Capacity 0.42 0.42 0.21 0.11 0.06 0.01 0.01 Queue Length (ft) 0 0 0 9 4 0 0 Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 15.7 15.1 13.2 13.2 Lane LOS C C B B Approach Delay (s) 0.0 15.5 13.2 Approach LOS C B Intersection :Summary Average Delay 0.6 Intersection Capacity Utilization 51.5% ICU Level of Service A Su' ar,rt' the public Vvith Priscilla A. `l-hompson City Clerk HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Synchro 5 Report thecorftla-sx51 Page 1 03- sit NEO MUSP SV th Street/ SW 1st Avenue Existing Conditions 2/20/2003 Movement: ;E9L'.-',IEBT EB'R -VVB ML-- T r�,W N SL BR 'NBT 8L -J'T--7-,,,j ZB SBS Lane Configurations *Ttt Ideal Flow (vphpi) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 12 12 11 11 11 12 12 12 12 11 11 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 Frt 1.00 0.95 O�85 Fit Protected 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd .:Flow (prot) 4902 3128 1393 Fit Permitted 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd.; Flow (perm) 4902 3128 1393 Volume (vph) 0 0 01 81 1403 0 0 0 0 0 301 317 Peak; , hour factor, PHF 0.94 1 0.94 0,94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Growth Factor (vph) 100% 10001b 100% 102% 102% 100% 1000/o 1000/o 1000/, 100% 1020% 102% Adj. Flow (vph) 0 0 0 88 1522 0 0 0 0 0 327 344 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 0 0 1610 0 0 0 0 0 470 201 Turn Type Perm Perm Protected Phases 4 8 6 Permitted Phases 8 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 33.0 36.0 36.0 Effective Green, g (s) 35.0 37.0 37.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.44 0.46 0.46 Clearance Time (s) 6.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2145 1447 644 v/s Ratio Prot c0.15 v/s Ratio Perm c0.33 0.14 v/c Ratio 0.75 0.32 0.31 Uniform Delay, dl 18.8 13.6 13.5 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 2.5 0.6 1.3. Delay (s) 21.3 14.2 14.8 Level of Service C B B Approach Delay (s) 0.0 21.3 0.0 14.4 Approach LOS A C A B In a60,S1ut*0rY'--':', - HCM Average Control Delay 19.3 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.53 Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 52,1% ICU Level of Service A c Critical Lane Group HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Synchro 5 Report thecorftla-sx51 Page 1 03- 811 1 INPUT FILE NAME: C:\ISIS Projects\NEO MUSP\NeoExisting.TRF RUN DATE 02/20/03 TTTTTTTTTTT RRRRRRRRR AAAAAAA FFFFFFFFFFF TTTTTTTTTTT RRRRRRRRRR AAAAAAAAA FFFFFFFFFFF TTTTTTTTTTT RRRRRRRRRRR AAAAAAAAAAA FFFFFFFFFFF TTT RRR RRR AAA AAA FFF TTT RRR RRR AAA AAA FFF TTT RRRRRRRRRRR AAAAAAAAAAA FFFFFFF TTT RRRRRRRRRR AAAAAAAAAAA FFFFFFF TTT RRR RRR AAA AAA FFF TTT RRR RRR AAA AAA FFF TTT RRR RRR AAA AAA FFF TTT RRR RRR AAA AAA FFF TTT RRR RRR AAA AAA FFF s . � Y Q P E"�9 kL VERSION 5.0 RELEASE DATE MAY 2001 TRAF SIMULATION MODEL DEVELOPED FOR U. S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION FHWA OFFICE OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND TECHNOLOGY 1, CARD FILE LIST OSEQ.#:----+----1----+----2----+----3----+----4----+----5----+----6----+----7----+----8 1 :Synchro File: J:\3241\NeoExisting.sy6, Date:Feb 20, 2003 00 2 : 02 20 03 01 3: 1 5 7981 O1 0 0 0 31200 7781 7581 02 4 : 900 03 5 : 60 04 6 : 1 NeoExi 05 7 : 1 6SW 1st Ave 10 8 : 1 4SW 7th Stree 10 9 2 1SW 7th Stree �J -- 811 110 0 10 : 3 1SWlst Ave 11 5 4SW 1st Ct 10 12 4 8SW 7th Stree 10 13 1 61920 2 0 8006 30 0 11 14 1 4 180 3 0 7TT 8 7 30 00 11 15 :8002 2 3 0 1 00 11 16 : 2 12000 3 0 TT8 6 4 30 00 11 17 :8003 3 3 0 1 00 11 18 3 12000 3 0 47T 6 4 30 0021 11 19 4 82000 3 0 8008 30 0 it 20 4 71600 1 0 8007 30 0 it 21 :8005 5 2 0 4 00 11 22 5 41872 2 0 81 8 7 7 30 00 11 23 :8007 7 2 0 4 00 it 24 7 41600 2 0 44 8 5 30 00 it 25 1 6 100 21 26 1 4 01691 3 0 21 27 :8002 2 100 21 28 : 2 1 831431 0 0 21 29 :8003 3 100 21 30 3 1 0 307 323 0 21 31 4 8 100 21 32 4 7 100 21 33 :8005 5 100 21 34 : 5 4 59 0 0 0 21 35 :8007 7 100 21 36 7 4 0 0 5 0 21 37 1 0 2 3 36 5 33 6 35 38 2 8002 35 39 3 8003 35 40 4 5 1 7 35 41 5 8005 35 42 6 1 35 43 7 8007 4 35 44 8 4 35 45 1 29 20 12 02 0 36 46 2 1 36 47 3 1 36 48 4 515 36 49 5 1 36 50 6 1 36 OSEQ.# :----+----1----+----2----+----3----+----4----+----5----+----6----+----7----+----8 1 CARD FILE LIST (CONT.) OSEQ.# :----+----1----+----2----+----3----+----4----+----5----+----6----+----7----+----8 51 7 11 36 52 8 1 36 53 :8002 21514 2 0 50 54 :8003 3 630 2 0 50 55 :8005 5 59 2 0 50 56 :8007 7 5 2 0 50 57 :2000 1 4 -60 51 58 : 0 170 59 : 1 15338 12840 public 195 60 : 2 18362 12840� rec with v 195 61 : 3 16522 15224 b` "'' 1^!7 195 62 4 13546 12824 $ 1 (t�.2 r� _,,._.' 195 63 : 5 13546 10952 ; 195 64 : 6 15338 10920 !psora !psora195 '.Clerk 65 7 13530 14424 195 66 8 11114 12824 195 67 1 210 OSEQ.# :----+----1----+----2----+----3----+----4----+----5----+----6----+----7----+----8 TRAF SIMULATION MODEL DEVELOPED FOR U. S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPOAAtION FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION FHWA OFFICE OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND TECHNOLOGY 0 Synchro File: J:\3241\NeoExisting.sy6, Date:Feb 20, 2003 0 DATE = 02/20/ 03 0 USER = 0 AGENCY = RUN CONTROL DATA VALUE RUN PARAMETERS AND OPTIONS 0 0 RUN IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 0 1 RUN TYPE CODE _ ( 1, 2, 3) TO RUN (SIMULATION, ASSIGNMENT, BOTH) (-1,-2,-3) TO CHECK (SIMULATION, ASSIGNMENT, BOTH) ONLY 0 NETSIM ENVIRONMENTAL OPTIONS ---------------------------- 0 FUEL/EMISSION RATE TABLES ARE NOT PRINTED 1 SIMULATION: PERFORMED ENVIRONMENTAL MEASURES: CALCULATED RATE TABLES: EMBEDDED TRAJECTORY FILE: WRITTEN 0 0 CODE _ (0,1,2) FOR UNIFORM DISTRIBUTION, NORMAL DISTRIBUTION, ERLANG DISTRIBUTION 0 0 INPUT UNITS CODE _ (0,1) IF INPUT IS IN (ENGLISH, METRIC) UNITS 0 OUTPUT UNITS CODE _ (0,1,2,3) IF OUTPUT IS IN (SAME AS INPUT, ENGLISH, METRIC, BOTH) UNITS 0 1200 CLOCK TIME AT START OF SIMULATION (HHMM) 0 0 SIGNAL TRANSITION CODE _ (0,1,2,3) IF(NO, IMMEDIATE, 2 -CYCLE, 3 - CYCLE) TRANSITION WAS REQUESTED 0 7581 RANDOM NUMBER SEED 7781 RANDOM NUMBER SEED TO GENERATE TRAFFIC STREAM FOR NETSIM OR LEVEL I SIMULATION 7981 RANDOM NUMBER SEED TO GENERATE EMISSION HEADWAYS FOR NETSIM SIMULATION TIME PERIOD 1 - NETSIM DATA Sub,nnitted Into the public' Pr�s.,, cegg pppp4 p'ry y' y NETSIM LINKS City Ciem" o 0 -LANES--CHAPINEL- F C U U LOST Q DIS FREE LANE LENGTH L PKT GRD LINK R DESTINATION NODE OPP. TIME HDWY. SPEED 900 DURATION (SEC) OF TIME PERIOD NO. 1 0 60 LENGTH OF A TIME INTERVAL, SECONDS 0 5 MAXIMUM INITIALIZATION TIME, NUMBER OF TIME INTERVALS 0 0 NUMBER OF TIME INTERVALS BETWEEN SUCCESSIVE STANDARD OUTPUTS 0 0 TIME INTERMEDIATE OUTPUT WILL BEGIN AT INTERVALS OF 0 SECS. FOR 0 SECS. FOR MICROSCOPIC MODELS 0 1 NETSIM MOVEMENT -SPECIFIC OUTPUT CODE _ (0,1) (IF NOT, IF) REQUESTED, FOR NETSIM SUBNETWORK 0 0 NETSIM GRAPHICS OUTPUT CODE _ (0,1) IF GRAPHICS OUTPUT (IS NOT, IS) REQUESTED TIME PERIOD 1 - NETSIM DATA Sub,nnitted Into the public' Pr�s.,, cegg pppp4 p'ry y' y NETSIM LINKS City Ciem" o 0 -LANES--CHAPINEL- F C U U LOST Q DIS FREE LANE LENGTH L PKT GRD LINK R DESTINATION NODE OPP. TIME HDWY. SPEED RTOR PED ALIGN STREET UNRESTRICTED 0 RTOR PERMITTED 0 NO PEDESTRIANS DISTRIBUTION USED FOR 1 LEFT TURNS ONLY 1 RTOR PROHIBITED 1 1 LIGHT l� ; o k Fid � � the p'ublio LINK FT / M L L R PCT TYPE B234567 LEFT THRU RGHT DIAG NODE SEC SEC MPH/KMPH CODE CODE -MENT NAME ONLY HT 5 CARS POOL 6 CAR - POOLS + BUSES 7 RIGHT TURNS + RIGHT DIAGONAL ( 11 6) 1920/ 585 2 0 0 0 1* 0000000 0 8006 0 0 0 2.0* 1.8* DIAGONAL TRAFFIC ONLY 30/ 48 0 0 1-1* SW 1st Ave TOTAL LINKS: 12 (ALLOWED: 1000) TOTAL NON -ENTRY NODES: 8 (ALLOWED: 500) ***** WARNING - 500 - Link (7,4) may not have been specified correctly on Record Type 11. Its traffic opposes traffic on link (5,4), but no receiving link (4,5) was input. Check Record Type 11. 1 ( 11 4) 180/ 55 3 0 0 0 1* 7TT0000 0 8 7 0 0 2.0* 1.8* 30/ 48 0 0 1-1* SW 7th Stree (8002, 2) 0/ 0 3 0 0 0 1* 0000000 0 1 0 0 0 2.0* 1.8* 0/ 0 0 0 1-1* ( 2, 1) 2000/ 610 3 0 0 0 1* TT80000 6 4 0 0 0 2.0* 1.8* 30/ 48 0 0 1-1* SW 7th Stree (8003, 3) 0/ 0 3 0 0 0 1* 0000000 0 1 0 0 0 2.0* 1.8* 0/ 0 0 0 1-1* ( 3, 1) 2000/ 610 3 0 0 0 1* 47T0000 0 6 4 0 0 2.0* 1.8* 30/ 48 0 0 2-1 SWlst Ave ( 4, 8) 2000/ 610 3 0 0 0 1* 0000000 0 8008 0 0 0 2.0* 1.8* 30/ 48 0 0 1-1* SW 7th Stree ( 4, 7) 1600/ 488 1 0 0 0 1* 0000000 0 8007 0 0 0 2.0* 1.8* 30/ 48 0 0 1-1* (8005, 5) 0/ 0 2 0 0 0 1* 0000000 0 4 0 0 0 2.0* 1.8* 0/ 0 0 0 1-1* ( 5, 4) 1872/ 571 2 0 0 0 1* 8100000 8 7 0 0 7 2.0* 1.8* 30/ 48 0 0 1-1* SW 1st Ct (8007, 7) 0/ 0 2 0 0 0 1* 0000000 0 4 0 0 0 2.0* 1.8* 0/ 0 0 0 1-1* ( 7, 4) 1600/ 488 2 0 0 0 1* 4400000 0 0 8 0 5 2.0* 1.8* 30/ 48 0 0 1-1* LINK TYPE PEDESTRIAN CODES * INDICATES DEFAULT VALUES WERE SPECIFIED LANE CHANNELIZATION CODES RTOR CODES IDENTIFIES THE 0 UNRESTRICTED 0 RTOR PERMITTED 0 NO PEDESTRIANS DISTRIBUTION USED FOR 1 LEFT TURNS ONLY 1 RTOR PROHIBITED 1 1 LIGHT l� ; o k Fid � � the p'ublio QUEUE DISCHARGE AND 2 BUSES ONLY 4: MODERATE ` r"� )l4 4 cle START-UP LOST TIME 3 CLOSED f„ CIT! HEAVY a CHARACTERISTICS. ONLY HT 5 CARS POOL 6 CAR - POOLS + BUSES 7 RIGHT TURNS + RIGHT DIAGONAL AND/OR THROUGH 8 LEFT TURNS + LEFT DIAGONAL AND/OR THROUGH 9 ALL PERMITTED MOVEMENTS WITH RESPECT TO THE GEOMETRY AND ADJACENT LANE CHANNELIZATIONS D DIAGONAL TRAFFIC ONLY T THROUGH TRAFFIC ONLY TOTAL LINKS: 12 (ALLOWED: 1000) TOTAL NON -ENTRY NODES: 8 (ALLOWED: 500) ***** WARNING - 500 - Link (7,4) may not have been specified correctly on Record Type 11. Its traffic opposes traffic on link (5,4), but no receiving link (4,5) was input. Check Record Type 11. 1 NETSIM TURNING MOVEMENT DATA TURN MOVEMENT PERCENTAGES TURN MOVEMENT POSSIBLE POCKET LENGTH (IN FEET/METERS) LINK LEFT THROUGH RIGHT DIAGONAL LEFT THROUGH RIGHT DIAGONAL LEFT RIGHT ( 11 6) 0 100 0 0 NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 11 4) 0 100 0 0 NO YES YES NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 (8002, 2) 0 100 0 0 NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 2, 1) 5 95 0 0 YES YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 (8003, 3) 0 100 0 0 NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 3, 1) 0 49 51 0 NO YES YES NO 0/ 0 O/ 0 ( 4, 8) 0 100 0 0 NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 4, 7) 0 100 0 0 NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 (8005, 5) 0 100 0 0 NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 { 5, 4) 100 0 0 0 YES YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 (8007, 7) 0 100 0 0 NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 7, 4) 0 0 100 0 NO NO YES NO O/ 0 0/ 0 1 SPECIFIED FIXED-TIME SIGNAL CONTROL, AND SIGN CONTROL, CODES 0 NODE 1 OFFSET 0 SEC CYCLE LENGTH 80 SEC 0 INTERVAL DURATION +- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - APPROACHES - - - -cc- - - - ud l -.Cl _ NUMBER (SEC) (PCT) ( 2, 1) ( 3, 1) 1 36 45 2 9 3 y _, 2 5 6 2 0 3 33 41 1 2 fi d3 I 4 6 7 0 2)+3 0 NODE 2 IS UNDER SIGN CONTROL --.ILY Clerk 0 INTERVAL DURATION +- - - - - - - - - - - - - - = APPROACHES - - - - - - - - NUMBER (SEC) (PCT) (8002, 2) 1 0 100 1 0 NODE 3 IS UNDER SIGN CONTROL 0 INTERVAL DURATION +- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - APPROACHES - - - - - - - - NUMBER (SEC) (PCT) (8003, 3) 1 0 100 1 0 NODE 4 IS UNDER SIGN CONTROL 0 INTERVAL DURATION +- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - APPROACHES - - - - - - - - NUMBER (SEC) (PCT) ( 5, 4) ( 11 4) ( 7, 4) 1 0 100 5 1 5 0 NODE 5 IS UNDER SIGN CONTROL 0 INTERVAL DURATION +- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - APPROACHES - - - - - - - - NUMBER (SEC) (PCT) (8005, 5) 1 0 100 1 0 NODE 6 IS UNDER SIGN CONTROL 0. INTERVAL DURATION +- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - APPROACHES - - - - - - - - NUMBER (SEC) (PCT) ( 1, 6) 1 0 100 1 0 NODE 7 IS UNDER SIGN CONTROL 0 INTERVAL DURATION +- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - APPROACHES - - - - - - - - NUMBER (SEC) (PCT) (8007, 7) ( 4, 7) 1 0 100 1 1 0 NODE 8 IS UNDER SIGN CONTROL 0 INTERVAL DURATION +- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - APPROACHES - - - - - - - - NUMBER (SEC) (PCT) ( 4, 8) _ 1 0 100 1 1 INTERPRETATION OF SIGNAL CODES 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 TRAFFIC YIELD OR AMBER GREEN RED RED WITH GREEN RIGHT ARROW RED WITH GREEN LEFT ARROW STOP RED WITH GREEN DIAGONAL ARROW NO TURNS -GREEN THRU ARROW RED WITH LEFT AND RIGHT GREEN ARROW NO LEFT TURN -GREEN THRU AND RIGHT CONTROL TABLE - SIGNS AND FIXED TIME SIGNALS CONTROL CODES GO = PROTECTED NOGO = NOT PERMITTED AMBR = AMBER PERM = PERMITTED NOT PROTECTED PROT = PROTECTED STOP = STOP SIGN YLD = YIELD SIGN NODE 1 FIXED TIME CONTROL OFFSET = 0 SECONDS CYCLE LENGTH = 80 SECONDS INTERVAL DURATION -------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------- APPROACHES 2, 1) ( 3, 1) LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG 1 36 NOGO NOGO GO GO 2 5 NOGO NOGO AMBR AMBR 3 33 PROT GO NOGO NOGG .b - 4 6 AMBR AMBR NOGO NOGG t NODE 2 SIGN CONTROL INTERVAL DURATION -------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------- APPROACHES (8002, 2) LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG 1 0 GO NODE 3 SIGN CONTROL INTERVAL DURATION ------------------------------------------- APPROACHES -------------------------------------------- (8003, 3) LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG 1 0 GO t,3- 811 NODE 4 SIGN CONTROL INTERVAL DURATION ------------------------------------------- APPROACHES -------------------------------------------- 5, 4) ( 1, 4) ( 7, 4) LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG 1 0 STOP STOP GO GO STOP NODE 5 SIGN CONTROL INTERVAL DURATION ------------------------------------------- APPROACHES -------------------------------------------- (8005, 5) LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG 1 0 GO 1 NODE 6 SIGN CONTROL INTERVAL DURATION ------------------------------------------- APPROACHES -------------------------------------------- 11 6) LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG 1 0 GO NODE 7 SIGN CONTROL INTERVAL DURATION ------------------------------------------- APPROACHES -------------------------------------------- (8007, 7) ( 4, 7) LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG 1 0 GO GO`w, NODE 8 SIGN CONTROLd INTERVAL DURATION ------------------------------------------- APPROACHES City Clerk -------------------------------------------- 4, 8) LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG 1 0 GO ENTRY LINK VOLUMES LINK FLOW RATE TRUCKS CAR POOLS HOV VIOLATORS (VEX/HOUR) (PERCENT) (PERCENT) (PERCENT) (8002, 2) 1514 2 0 1.00 (8003, 3) 630 2 0 1.00 (8005, 5) 59 2 0 1.00 (8007, 7) 5 2 0 1.00 NETSIM VEHICLE TYPE SPECIFICATIONS VEHICLE LENGTH Q DSCHG HDWY FLEET COMPONENT 03- 811 PERCENTAGES PERF. 3 FEET 5* / 2 FEET 12* / TYPE FEET/METERS FACTOR (PCT) AVG. OCCUP. AUTO TRUCK CARPOOL BUS INDEX 81 1** 16.0/ 4.9 100 1.3 75 0 0 } 0 2 2** 35.0/ 10.7 120 1.2 0 100 0 0 3 3** 16.0/ 4.9 100 2.5 0 0 100 0 2 4** 40.0/ 12.2 120 25.0 0 0 0 100 7 5** 14..0/ 4.3 100 1.3 25 0 0 0 1 6** 53.0/ 16.2 120 1.2 0 0 0 0 4 7** 53.0/ 16.2 120 1.2 0 0 0 0 5 8** 64.0/ 19.5 120 1.2 0 0 0 0 6 9** 14.0/ 4.3 100 2.5 0 0 0 0 1 ** INDICATES THAT ALL PARAMETERS FOR VEHICLE TYPE ASSUME DEFAULT VALUES 1 DEFAULT LINK GEOMETRIC DATA WIDTH OF LANES 12 FEET LONGITUDINAL DISTANCE FROM THE STOP 4 FEET 19llr44 1 ^ LINE TO THE NEAR CURB ke. FORWARD SIGHT DISTANCE AT STOP LINE 1000 FEET 1 recc,:,, I� iternP2-1°;Z I'1 -d3 Prisc-di a A. Thom,.�Sorl City Clerk LANE CHANGE DATA i PARAMETERS VALUE UNITS ENGLISH / METRIC DURATION OF LANE CHANGE MANEUVER 3* SECONDS MEAN DRIVER REACTION TIME OF A SECOND TIME REQUIRED FOR SUCCESSIVE LANE CHANGES OF A SECOND DECELERATION AT BEGINNING OF LANE CHANGE MANEUVER [METERS] / SECOND**2 DIFFERENCE IN VEHICLE'S DECELERATION OVER THE DISTANCE BETWEEN ITS POSITION WHEN IT BEGINS TO RESPOND TO AN OBSTRUCTION AND THE POSITION OF THE OBSTRUCTION - FOR MANDATORY LANE CHANGE: [METERS] / SECOND**2 FOR DISCRETIONARY LANE CHANGE: [METERS] / SECOND**2 PANIC DECELERATION RATE OF LEAD VEHICLE FOR COMPUTATION OF CAR -FOLLOWING LAW [METERS] / SECOND**2 PANIC DECELERATION RATE OF FOLLOWER VEHICLE FOR COMPUTATION OF CAR -FOLLOWING LAW [METERS] / SECOND**2 10* 20* 5* / 2 TENTHS TENTHS FEET 10* / 3 FEET 5* / 2 FEET 12* / 4 FEET 12* / 4 FEET J- 81 "ohre pub,,- ub,i! ii! 6, o n n - J o M" DRIVER TYPE FACTOR USED TO COMPUTE DRIVER AGGRESSIVENESS 25* Pfisdyia A. 2* / 1 " ^ City Qork URGENCY THRESHOLD SECONDS**2 / FEET [METERS] SAFETY FACTOR FOR COMPUTATION OF PERCEIVED RISK OF LANE CHANGE g* FACTOR * 10 PERCENT OF DRIVERS WHO COOPERATE WITH A LANE CHANGER 50* HEADWAY BELOW WHICH ALL DRIVERS WILL ATTEMPT TO CHANGE LANES 20* TENTHS OF A SECOND HEADWAY ABOVE WHICH NO DRIVERS WILL ATTEMPT TO CHANGE LANES 50* TENTHS OF A SECOND FORWARD DISTANCE SCANNED BY DRIVER FOR A TURN MOVEMENT / BUS STATION IN ORDER TO ASSESS NEED FOR A LANE CHANGE 300* / 91 FEET / [METERS] * INDICATES DEFAULT VALUES WERE SPECIFIED MAXIMUM ACCELERATION -------------------------- TABLE PERFORMANCE 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 INDEX FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC ----- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 1 8.00 9.00 6.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2 6.00 12.00 10.00 8.00 7.00 6.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 3 4.69 5.35 4.94 3.47 3.09 2.61 2.14 1.70 1.27 .86 .46 .06 4 2.81 2.42 2.15 2.04 1.74 1.42 1.12 .83 .56 .30 .04 -.23 5 2.76 2.37 1.81 1.56 1.25 .97 .73 .52 .32 .14 -.05 -.23 6 2.45 2.14 1.42 1.12 .85 .63 .44 .29 .14 .00 -.14 -.27 7 7.47 5.33 3.17 2.66 2.29 1.65 1.40 .95 .75 .50 -.33 -.35 GRADE CORRECTION FACTORS FOR ACCELERATION (USED BY FRESIM ONLY) --------------------------------------------------------------- PERFORMANCE 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 INDEX FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC ----- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 1 .31 .31 .31 .31 .31 .31 .31 .31 .31 .31 .31 .31 2 .31 .31 .31 .31 .31 .31 .31 .31 .31 .31 .31 .31 3 .21 .21 .21 .22 .23 .25 .26 .27 .28 .28 .30 .31 4 .16 .15 .19 .22 .24 .25 .27 .28 .29 .31 .31 .31 5 .18 .17 .20 .23 .25 .27 .28 .30 .31 .31 .31 .31 6 .18 .18 .22 .25 .27 .29 .30 .30 .31 .31 .31 .31 7 .27 .27 .27 .27 .27 .29 .29 .30 .30 .30 .30 .30 GRADE CORRECTION FACTORS FOR FUEL CONSUMPTION (USED BY FRESIM ONLY) ------------------------------------------------------------------- PERFORMANCE 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 INDEX FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC ----- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 1 .31 .31 .31 .31 .31 .31 .31 .31 .31 .31 .31 .31 2 .31 .31 .31 .31 .31 .31 .31 .31 .31 .31 .31 .31 3 .26 .26 .26 .28 .29 .30 .30 .30 .30 .30 .30 .30 4 .11 .11 .23 .27 .28 .29 .30 .30 .30 .30 .30 .30 5 .16 .16 .26 .28 .29 .30 .30 .30 .30 .30 .30 .30 6 .20 .20 .28 .29 .30 .30 .30 .30 .31 .31 .31 .31 7 .27 .27 .27 .27 .27 .29 .29 .30 .30 .30 .30 .30 ***** WARNING - 400 - An inconsistency exists between the length of link (4,8) input on Record Type 11 or Record Type 19 and the length of this link computed from node coordinate data input for nodes 4 and 8 on Record Type 195. The length input was 2000, and the length computed from node coordinate data is 2432. ***** WARNING - 400 - An inconsistency exists between the length of link (1,4) input on Record Type 11 or Record Type 19 and the length of this link computed from node coordinate data input for nodes 1 and 4 on Record Type 195. The length input was 180, and the length computed from node coordinate data is 1792. ***** WARNING - 400 - An inconsistency exists between the length of link (3,1) input on Record Type it or Record Type 19 and the length of this link computed from node coordinate data input for nodes 3 and 1 on Record Type 195. The length input was 2000, and the length computed from node coordinate data is 2661. ***** WARNING - 400 - An inconsistency exists between the length of link (2,1) input on Record Type 11 or Record Type 19 and the length of this link computed from node coordinate data input for nodes 2 and 1 on Record Type 195. The length input was 2000, and the length computed from node coordinate data is 3024. **** THERE WERE 5 WARNING MESSAGES IN DATA. 1 SOURCE/SINK FLOW RATES _qitgnitted Into me rpuhiic' BEGIN TIME CENTROID LINK (MINUTES) (2000) ( 1, 4) 0 (2000) ( 11 4) 15 1 TIME INTERVAL SUBNETWORK NUMBER TYPE DIFFERENCE 6L FLOW RATE (VEH/HOUR) a " ^: Z � .. -60 -60 INITIALIZATION STATISTICS PRIOR CONTENT CURRENT CONTENT PERCENT (VEHICLES) (VEHICLES) 03-- 811 P'i 'J 3 1 2 NETSIM NETSIM 0 32 32 57 City Cktrk 3 NETSIM 57 78 36 4 NETSIM 78 70 10 5 NETSIM 70 64 8 EQUILIBRIUM ATTAINED ALL EXISTING SUBNETWORKS REACHED EQUILIBRIUM 1 CUMULATIVE NETSIM STATISTICS AT TIME 12:15: 0 ELAPSED TIME IS 0:15: 0 ( 900 SECONDS), TIME PERIOD 1 ELAPSED TIME IS 900 SECONDS VEHICLE MINUTES RATIO MINUTES/MILE -------- SECONDS VEHICLE --------- - AVERAGE VALUES - VEHICLE MOVE DELAY TOTAL MOVE/ TOTAL DELAY TOTAL DELAY CONTROL QUEUE STOP* STOPS VOL SPEED LINK MILES TRIPS TIME TIME TIME TOTAL TIME TIME TIME TIME DELAY DELAY ---- TIME M VPH MPH ----------- -------------------- ----- ------------- ------------------------------------- 11 6) 37.45 103 ------------------- 74.9 8.1 83.0 .90 2.22 .22 48.3 4.7 .0 .0 .0 0 412 27.1 11 4) 14.45 428 28.9 8.8 37.7 .77 2.61 .61 5.3 1.2 .0 .0 .0 0 1712 23.0 (8002, 2) 378 1512 2, 1) 143.18 378 286.4 125.4 411.8 .70 2.88 .88 63.2 18.9 16.6 14.2 13.4 63 1512 20.9 (8003, 3) 156 624 3, 1) 57.95 153 115.9 30.1 146.0 .79 2.52 .52 56.5 12.0 9.7 8.6 8.3 52 612 23.8 4, 8) 158.33 418 316.7 43.6 360.3 .88 2.28 .28 48.8 6.1 .0 .0 .0 0 1672 26.4 4, 7) .00 0 .0 .0 .0 .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 0 0 .0 (8005, 5) 14 56 5, 4) 5.32 15 10.6 4.0 14.6 .73 2.75 .75 54.9 14.9 9.0 8.5 8.3 100 60 21.8 (8007, 7) 1 4 7, 4) .30 1 .6 .0 .6 1.00 1.92 .00 35.0 .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 100 4 31.2 OSUBNETWORK- 416.99 535 13.90 3.67 17.57 .79 2.53 .53 1.77 .37 .23 .20 .19 63.2 23.7 VEHICLE - HOURS -- --- MINUTES VEHICLE-, TRIP --- PER TRIP 1 CUMULATIVE NETSIM STATISTICS AT TIME 12:15: 0 ELAPSED TIME IS 0:15: 0 ( 900 SECONDS), TIME PERIOD I ELAPSED TIME IS 900 SECONDS VEH-MINS AVERAGE -- CONGESTION -- ------------ Q U E U E L E N G T H (VEHICLE) ------------ NUMBER QUEUE STOP OCCUPANCY STORAGE PHASE AVERAGE QUEUE BY LANE MAXIMUM QUEUE BY LANE OF LANE LINK TIME TIME (VEHICLE) M FAILURE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 ---- 3 4 5 6 ------------- 7 CHANGES --------- ---------------- 11 6) .1 .0 5.9 3.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 LANE 1 LANE 2 LANE ( 1, LANE 6 4) .3 .1 2.8 10.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 6 VEH VPH ( 1, 6) ( 2, 180 1) 94.4 89.1 27.7 9.2 0 2 3 2 0 0 0 0 9 9 8 0 0 0 0 144 608 155 620 114 456 0 0 0 0 0 0 ( 3, 1) 24.0 23.3 10.4 3.5 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 3 3 0 0 0 0 35 ( 3, 1) ( 4, 184 8) .1 .0 24.9 8.3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 119 540 162 648 121 484 0 0 0 0 0 0 ( 4, 7) .0 .0 .0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ( 5, 4) ( 5, 52 4) 2.3 2.2 1.7 .9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 Orecotd in 0 0 ( 7, 4) .0 .0 .1 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 City CIE, 1 OSUBNETWORK= 121.2 114.7 73.6 5.0 0 OF EFFECTIVENESS LINK 329 PERSON PERSON DELAY TRAVEL TIME MILE * THESE VALUES INCLUDE THE TIME FOR VEHICLES CURRENTLY ON THE LINK. PSRSON-MIN ** AVERAGE QUEUE CALCULATED BASED ON TIME SINCE BEGINNING OF SIMULATION ( 1, 6) 48.7 133.9 10.5 107.9 1 CUMULATIVE NETSIM STATISTICS AT TIME 12:15: 0 900 SECONDS ELAPSED TIME IS 0:15: 0 ( 900 SECONDS), TIME PERIOD 1 ELAPSED TIME IS DISCHARGE BY LANE LANE 1 LANE 2 LANE 3 LANE 4 LANE 5 LANE 6 LANE 7 LINK VEH VPH VEH VPH VEH VPH VEH VPH VEH VPH VEH VPH VEH VPH ( 1, 6) 45 180 58 232 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ( 1, 4) 152 608 155 620 114 456 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ( 2, 1) 113 452 137 548 128 512 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ( 3, 1) 46 184 58 232 49 196 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ( 4, 8) 135 540 162 648 121 484 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ( 4, 7) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ( 5, 4) 13 52 2 8 0 0 n OSubrNtted Into a 0 0 0 0 lh p8blic ( 7, 4) 1 4 0 0 0 0 Orecotd in 0 0 0 0 u . City CIE, 1 NETSIM PERSON MEASURES OF EFFECTIVENESS LINK PERSON PERSON DELAY TRAVEL TIME MILE TRIPS PERSON -MIN PSRSON-MIN ( 1, 6) 48.7 133.9 10.5 107.9 a- � �1 1 *** NOTE *** TIME PERIOD 1 SPECIFIC NETSIM STATISTICS ARE THE SAME AS CUMULATIVE OUTPUT AT THE END OF TIME PERIOD 1. 1 0 ( 1, 4) 18.8 48.9 VEHICLE -MILE STOPS (PCT) 103 0 ( 2, 1) 185.9 534.5 378 198.5 39.1 542.4 ( 3, 1) 75.2 189.5 5.2 1.3 .0 0 ( 4, 8) 205.4 467.5 0 .00 37.45 .00 ( 4, 7) .0 .0 1 0 0 0 ( 5, 4) 6.9 19.0 14.45 .00 .0 .7 ( 7, 4) .4 .8 (8002, 1 *** NOTE *** TIME PERIOD 1 SPECIFIC NETSIM STATISTICS ARE THE SAME AS CUMULATIVE OUTPUT AT THE END OF TIME PERIOD 1. 1 0 Llublr;lt,r,d ) fic,r THRU RIGHT VEHICLE -MILE STOPS (PCT) 103 0 0 490.7 162 8Cj 0 378 198.5 39.1 542.4 56.6 .0 .0 19.5 5.2 1.3 .0 1 *** NOTE *** TIME PERIOD 1 SPECIFIC NETSIM STATISTICS ARE THE SAME AS CUMULATIVE OUTPUT AT THE END OF TIME PERIOD 1. 1 0 LINK ) LEFT THRU RIGHT VEHICLE -MILE STOPS (PCT) 103 0 0 428 0 0 378 0 13 LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU 0 RIGHT 66 0 418 0 ( 1, 6) 0 .00 37.45 .00 .0 .0 0 .0 1 0 0 0 ( 1, 4) .00 14.45 .00 .0 .7 .0 (8002, 2) ( 2, 1) 4.92 138.26 .00 53.8 63.6 .0 - (8003, 3) ( 3, 1) .00 32.95 25.00 .0 51.7 53.0 ( 4, 8) .00 158.33 .00 .0 .0 .0 ( 4, 7) .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 (8005, 5) ( 5, 4) 5.32 .00 .00 100.0 .0 .0 (8007, 7) ( 7, 4) .00 .00 .30 .0 .0 .0 1 LINK MOVING TIME RATIO MOVE/TOTAL (VEH-MINS) (VER -MINS) LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT ( 1, 6) .00 74.91 .00 .00 .90 .00 ( 11 4) .00 29.18 .00 .00 .77 .00 (8002, 2) ( 2, 1) 9.85 276.52 .00 .70 .70 .00 NETSIM MOVEMENT SPECIFIC STATISTICS - TABLE I NETSIM MOVEMENT SPECIFIC STATISTICS - TABLE II VEHICLE -TRIPS ) LEFT THRU RIGHT RIGHT 0 103 0 0 428 0 0 378 0 13 365 0 0 156 0 0 87 66 0 418 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 15 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 NETSIM MOVEMENT SPECIFIC STATISTICS - TABLE II SPEED (MPH ) LEFT THRU RIGHT .0 27.1 .0 .0 23.0 .0 21.0 20.9 .0 .0 22.3 26.1 .0 26.4 .0 .0 .0 .0 21.8 .0 .0 .0 .0 31.2, NETSIM MOVEMENT SPECIFIC STATISTICS - TABLE II DELAY TIME TOTAL TIME (VEH-MINS) (VEH-MINS) LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT .00 8.09 .00 .00 83.00 .00 .00 8.50 .00 .00 37.68 .00 4.22 121.18 .00 14.07 397.70 .00 (8003, 3) ( 3, 1) .00 65.91 50.00 .00 22.61 7.52 .00 88.52 57.52 .00 .74 .87 ( 4, 8) .00 316.67 .00 .00 43.58 .00 .00 360.25 .00 ,7 .00 .88 .00 ( 4, 7) .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 (8005, 5) ( 51 4) 10.64 .00 .00 3.98 .00 .00 14.62 .00 .00 .73 .00 .00 (8007, 7) { 7, 4) .00 .00 .61 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .61 .00 .00 1.00 1 NETSIM MOVEMENT SPECIFIC STATISTICS - TABLE III LINK TOTAL TIME DELAY TIME QUEUE TIME** STOP TIME** (SECS/VEH) (SECS/VEH) (VEH-MINS) (VEH-MINS) LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT ( 11 6) .0 48.3 .0 .0 4.7 .0 .0 .1 .0 .0 .0 .0 ( 11 4) .0 5.3 .0 .0 1.2 .0 .0 .3 .0 .0 .1 .0 (8002, 2) ( 2, 1) 64.9 65.4 .0 19.5 19.9 .0 2.5 91.8 .0 2.3 86.7 .0 (8003, 3) ( 3, 1) .0 61.0 52.3 .0 15.6 6.8 .0 17.9 6.1 .0 17.3 6.0 ( 41 8) .0 51.7 .0 .0 6.3 .0 .0 .1 .0 .0 .0 .0 ( 4, 7) .0 .0 O .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 (8005, 5) ( 5, 4) 58.5 .0 .0 15.9 .0 .0 2.3 .0 .0 2.2 .0 .0 (8007, 7) ( 7, 4) .0 .0 35.0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 (UJ��gg�g�g�}}¢�,� ** TIME FOR VEHICLES CURRENTLY ON THE LINK ARE INCLUDED I1T'THB Public rec' , 0 it dt~ sY �; -gra ° iter) p-?- !-en 7_ 1 ps gciile A NETSIM CUMULATIVE VALUES OF FUEL CONSUMPTRI1dgF��,3� Y Clerk LINK FUEL CONSUMPTION GALLONS M.P.G. VEHICLE TYPE- 5 1 2 6 7 8 4 5 1 2 6 7 8 4 J 11 6) .59 .96 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 17.76 27.46 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 4, 8) 2.32 3.67 .99 .00 .00 .00 .00 18.85 31.13 3.92 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 4, 7) .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 5, 4) .06 .14 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 18.74 27.42 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 11 4) .67 .95 .20 .00 .00 .00 .00 5.64 10.38 1.61 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 3, 1) .81 1.53 .27 .00 .00 .00 .00 18.55 27.70 5.52 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 2, 1) 2.42 4.28 .58 .00 .00 .00 .00 15.65 23.66 4.48 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 7, 4) .00 .01 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 25.97 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 SUBNETWORK- 6.87 11.54 2.04 .00 .00 .00 .00 16.31 25.84 4.07 .00 .00 .00 .00 VEHICLE TYPES 1, 5 = AUTO, VEHICLE TYPES 2, 6, 7, 8 = TRUCK, VEHICLE TYPE 4 a BUS gggg pp�qq i'fiY# r-� rye f� t 1 Y fi ' Rlo ? �A/��56� NETSIM CUMULATIVE VALUES OF EMFSS PIP- LINK VEHICLE EMISSIONS (GRAMS/ MILE) Priscilla A. ITEos HC .� �t , Cot)6 Cierk, VEHICLE TYPE- 5 1 2 6 7 4 ( 11 6) .05 .08 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 4, 8) .04 .04 7.49 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 4, 7) .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 51 4) .05 .06 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 11 4) .45 .54 20.06 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 3, 1) .05 .06 5.09 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 2, 1) .08 .09 6.38 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 7, 4) .00 .12 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 SUBNETWORK- .07 .08 7.19 .00 .00 .00 .00 VEHICLE TYPES 1, 5 = AUTO, VEHICLE TYPES 2, 6, 7, 8 = TRUCK, VEHICLE TYPE 4 = TRANSIT BUS 1 NETSIM CUMULATIVE VALUES OF EMISSION LINK VEHICLE EMISSIONS (GRAMS/ MILE) CO VEHICLE TYPE- 5 1 2 6 7 8 4 ( 11 6) 4.28 6.40 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 4, 8) 3.84 3.70 114.24 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 4, 7) .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 5, 4) 4.16 5.59 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 1, 4) 25.77 39.89 336.81 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 3, 1) 4.65 5.54 72.74 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 2, 1) 6.18 7.40 93.44 .00 .00 .00 .'0 0 ( 7, 4) .00 10.90 .00 .00 .00 .00 00 SUBNETWORK- 5.52 6.69 108.75 .00 .00 .00 .00 VEHICLE TYPES 1, 5 = AUTO, VEHICLE TYPES 2, 6, 7, 8 = TRUCK, VEHICLE TYPE 4 a TRANSIT BUS 1 NETSIM CUMULATIVE VALUES OF EMISSION 0 3 LINK VEHICLE EMISSIONS (GRAMS/ MILE) NO VEHICLE TYPE- 5 1 2 6 7 8 4 ( 1, 6) .29 .28 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 4, 8) .21 .15 16.11 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 4, 7) .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 51 4) .23 .16 .00 .00 .00 .00. .00 ( 11 4) 2.52 1.88 53.56 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 3, 1) .22 .20 10.23 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 2, 1) .32 .31 12.98 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 7, 4) .00 .44 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 SUBNETWORK- .34 .28 15.50 .00 .00 .00 .00 VEHICLE TYPES 1, 5 - AUTO, VEHICLE TYPES 2, 6, 7, 8 - TRUCK, VEHICLE TYPE 4 - TRANSIT BUS THE HIGHEST NUMBER OF VEHICLES ON THE NETWORK WAS 85 VEHICLES (MAXIMUM ALLOWED IS 20000). THIS MAXIMUM OCCURRED AT 132 SECONDS. ------------------------------- NETWORK-WIDE AVERAGE STATISTICS ------------------------------- TOTAL VEHICLE- MILE = 416.99 VEHICLE -HOURS OF: MOVE TIME = 13.90 , DELAY TIME _ 3.67 , TOTAL TIME = 17.57 AVERAGE SPEED ( MPH)= 23.74 MOVE/TOTAL = .79 .53 , TOTAL TIME = 2.53 NETWORK -WIDE STATISTICS FOR SCRIPT PROCESSING 416.99, 13.90, 3.67, 17.57, 23.74, .79, TOTAL CPU TIME FOR SIMULATION 1.71 SECONDS TOTAL CPU TIME FOR THIS RUN = 1.71 SECONDS 0***** THERE WERE 5 WARNING MESSAGES. OLAST CASE PROCESSED MINUTES/MILE OF: DELAY TIME = .53, 2.53 Subrnittrz d Into the public record :. s items ' '_t 3ti i ._ . City Clerk NEO VERTIKA MUSP Traffic Analysis APPENDIX C Future (2005) Level of Service Calculations without the Project :.a pub lie e.ba r 4=k93i2 B bttern a City Clerk JA3241 \Draft Report. DOC J 3/25/03 sit NEO MUSP Y7th Street/ SW 1st COUrt Future, Without P * _* --* t ~/ Lane Configurations ttl� +T rr Sign Control Free Fnyo Shop Stop Grade O% O% O% O% Volume (veh/h) 0 U O O 1794 3 80 O 0 O O 5 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.84 0.84 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.84 Hourly flow -rate (veh/h) 0 U O O 1986 3 88 U 0 O O 6 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/u) ' Percent Blk n/H//t..tu///flare \ven/ ' Median Nona None Median storage veh) vC conflictingvo|ume 1969 O 861 1869 0 1967 1967 657 vC1.stage 1oonfvol vC2. stage 2 oonfvo| tC. single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 tC. 2stage (a) tF(s)' 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 33 3.5 4.0 3.3 pOqueue free 96 100 100 81 100 100 100 100 99 u[Wcapacity (veh/h) 291 1622 343 62 1084 37 62 407 Volume Total 786 786 396 44 22 3 3 Volume Left O O U 44 22 0 O Volume Right O D 3 U O 3 3 cSH 1700 1700 1700 343 343 407 407 Volume toCapacity 0.46 0.46 0.23 0.13 0.06 0.01 0.01 Queue Length (f) O O 0 11 5 1 1 Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 17.0 16.2 13.9 13.9 Lane LOS C C B B Approach Delay (s) 0.0 167 13.9 Approach LOS C B Average Delay 0.6 Intersection Capacity Utilization 54.7% ICU Level of Service A _HCNY Unaigno|izad Intersection Capacity Analysis Gynchpo 6 Report J:\3241\NeoFutunaVVOuLeyG Page ���~. ��� ���_= NEO MUSP 7th Street/ SW 1 st Avenue Future, Without Project 2/20/2003 Lane Configurations Ot tl� r Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 12 12 11 11 11 12 12 12 12 11 11 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 Frt 1.00 0.95 0.85 Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 4902 3127 1393 Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd Flow (perm) 4902 3127 1393 Volume (vph) 0 0 0 81 1403 0 0 0 0 0 301 317 Peak hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 -0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Growth Factor (vph) 100% 100% 100% 105% 105% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 105% 105% Adj. Flow (vph) 0 0 0 90 1`567 0 0 0 0 0 336 354 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 0 0 1657 0 0 0 0 0 484 206 Tum Type Perm Perm Protected Phases 8 6 Permitted Phases 8 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 33.0 36.0 36.0 Effective Green, g (s) 35.0 37.0 37.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.44 0.46 0.46 Clearance Time (s) 6.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2145 1446 644 v/s Ratio Prot c0.15 v/s Ratio Perm c0.34 0.15 v/c Ratio 0.77 0.33 0.32 Uniform Delay, d1 19.1 13.7 13.6 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 2.8 0.6 1.3 Delay (s) 21.9 14.3 14.9 Level of Service C B B Approach Delay (s) 0.0 21.9 0.0 14.5 Approach LOS A C A B 0,010 HCM Average Control Delay 19.7 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.55 Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 53.4% ICU Level of Service A c Critical Lane Group Sub tl - d, Into the public r� fi �=. n with jrnpsorl City Clerk HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Synchro 5 Report 'J:\3241\NeoFutureW,Out.sy6 Page 1 thecorftla-sx51 03- Sit INPUT FILE NAME: C:\TSIS Projects\NEO MUSP\NeoFutureW,Out.TRF RUN DATE : 02/20/03 TTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTT TTT TTT TTT TTT TTT TTT TTT TTT TTT RRRRRRRRR RRRRRRRRRR RRRRRRRRRRR RRR RRR RRR RRR RRRRRRRRRRR RRRRRRRRRR RRR RRR RRR RRR RRR RRR RRR RRR RRR RRR AAAAAAA AAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAA AAA AAA AAA AAA AAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAA AAA AAA AAA AAA AAA AAA AAA AAA AAA AAA FFFFFFFFFFF FFFFFFFFFFF FFFFFFFFFFF FFF FFF FFFFFFF FFFFFFF FFF FFF FFF FFF FFF . PST°: VERSION 5.0 RELEASE DATE MAY 2001 TRAF SIMULATION MODEL DEVELOPED FOR U. S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION FHWA OFFICE OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND TECHNOLOGY 1_ CARD FILE LIST OSEQ.#:----+----1----+----2----+----3----+-----4----+----5----+----6----+----7----+----8 1 :Synchro File: J:\3241\NeoFutureW,Out.sy6, Date:Feb 20, 2003 00 2 02 20 03 01 3 1 5 7981 01 0 0 0 31200 7781 7581 02 4 900 03 5 60 04 6 1 NeoFut 05 7 1 6SW 1st Ave 10 8 1 4SW 7th Stree 10 9 2 1SW 7th Stres 911 10 3 1SWlst Ave it 5 4SW 1st Ct 36 52 : 8 10 12 4 SSW 7th Stree 36 53 :8002 21558 2 0 10 13 1 61920 2 0 8006 30 0 11 14 1 4 180 3 0 7TT 8 7 30 00 11 15 :8002 2 3 0 45 1 00 11 16 2 12000 3 0 TT8 6 4 30 00 11 17 :8003 3 3 0 18362 1 00 11 18 3 12000 3 0 47T 6 4 30 0021 11 19 4 82000 3 0 5 8008 30 0 11 20 4 71600 1 0 _... 8007 30 0 it 21 :8005 5 2 0 66 4 11114 00 11 22 : 5 41872 2 0 81 8 7 7 30 00 11 23 :8007 7 2 0 4 00 11 24 : 7 41600 2 0 44 8 5 30 00 11 25 : 1 6 100 21 26 : 1 4 01848 3 0 21 27 :8002 2 100 21 28 : 2 1 851473 0 0 21 29 :8003 3 100 21 30 3 1 0 316 333 0 21 31 4 8 100 21 32 4 7 100 21 33 :8005 5 100 21 34 5 4 62 0 0 0 21 35 :8007 7 100 21 36 7 4 0 0 5 0 21 37 1 0 2 3 36 5 33 6 35 38 2 8002 35 39 3 8003 35 40 4 5 1 7 35 41 5 8005 35 42 6 1 35 43 7 8007 4 35 44 8 4 35 45 1 29 20 12 02 0 36 46 2 1 36 47 3 1 36 48 4 515 36 49 5 1 36 50 6 1 36 OSEQ.# :----+----1----+----2----+----3----+----4----+----5----+----6----+----7----+----8 1 CARD FILE LIST (CONT.) OSEQ.#:----+----1----+----2----+----3----+----4----+----5----+----6----+----7----+----8 51 : 7 11 36 52 : 8 1 36 53 :8002 21558 2 0 50 54 :8003 3 649 2 0 50 55 :8005 5 62 2 0 50 56 :8007 7 5 2 0 50 57 :2000 1 4 45 51 58 0 170 59 1 15338 12840 ��'��+ 195 60 2 18362 12840 195 61 3 16522 15224 rc } CAI 195 62 4 13546 12824 h��-- �2• 7• �i�O$ 195 63 5 1354610952 195 64 6 15338 10920 _... :)n 195 65 : 7 13530 14424 r, 195 66 : 8 11114 12824 195 67 : 1 210 OSEQ.# :----+----1----+----2----+----3----+----4----+----5----+----6----+----7----+----8 TRAF SIMULATION MODEL DEVELOPED FOR U. S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATI N� w FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION FHWA OFFICE OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND TECHNOLOGY 0 Synchro File: J:\3241\NeoFutureW,0ut.sy6, Date:Feb 20, 2003 0 Into the puhlic 4 P...r DATE - 02/20/ 03 a € �" e'b 0 USER = 0 AGENCY °2 �o-"ski• RUN CONTROL DATA city usev'.N' VALUE RUN PARAMETERS AND OPTIONS �s 0 0 RUN IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 0 1 RUN TYPE CODE _ ( 1, 2, 3) TO RUN (SIMULATION, ASSIGNMENT, BOTH) (-1,-2,-3) TO CHECK (SIMULATION, ASSIGNMENT, BOTH) ONLY 0 NETSIM ENVIRONMENTAL OPTIONS 7981 RANDOM NUMBER SEED TO GENERATE EMISSION HEADWAYS FOR NETSIM SIMULATION 900 DURATION (SEC) OF TIME PERIOD NO. 1 0 60 LENGTH OF A TIME INTERVAL, SECONDS 0 5 MAXIMUM INITIALIZATION TIME, NUMBER OF TIME INTERVALS 0 0 NUMBER OF TIME INTERVALS BETWEEN SUCCESSIVE STANDARD OUTPUTS 0 0 TIME INTERMEDIATE OUTPUT WILL BEGIN AT INTERVALS OF 0 SECS. FOR 0 SECS. FOR MICROSCOPIC MODELS 0 1 NETSIM MOVEMENT -SPECIFIC OUTPUT CODE _ (0,1) (IF NOT, IF) REQUESTED FOR NETSIM SUBNETWORK 0 0 NETSIM GRAPHICS OUTPUT CODE = (0,1) IF GRAPHICS OUTPUT (IS NOT, IS) REQUESTED TIME PERIOD 1 - NETSIM DATA ,t *,t,t,tt,t,t,t,t,t,t,►,t,t*,t*,t,t,t*+t+t,t,t* *,t *,t,t,t,t,t,tr,t,t,t ***,t,t,t**,t,t ** *r*,t,t,t,t,t*,ta,t,t,t***,t,t,t,t,t,t,t,t,t,t,r*,t,r,t,t,t,r,t *,r *,t,t,t *+t,t,t*,t 1 NETSIM LINKS 0 -LANES- -CHANNEL- F C U U LOST Q DIS FREE LANE LENGTH L PRT GRD LINK R DESTINATION NODE OPP. TIME HDWY. SPEED .t 0 11 0 FUEL/EMISSION RATE TABLES ARE NOT PRINTED 1 SIMULATION: PERFORMED ENVIRONMENTAL MEASURES: CALCULATED RATE TABLES: EMBEDDED TRAJECTORY FILE: WRITTEN 0 0 CODE _ (0,1,2) FOR UNIFORM DISTRIBUTION, NORMAL DISTRIBUTION, ERLANG DISTRIBUTION 0 0 INPUT UNITS CODE = (0,1) IF INPUT IS IN (ENGLISH, METRIC) UNITS 0 OUTPUT UNITS CODE = (0,1,2,3) IF OUTPUT IS IN (SAME AS INPUT, ENGLISH, METRIC, BOTH) UNITS 0 1200 CLOCK TIME AT START OF SIMULATION (HHMM) 0 0 SIGNAL TRANSITION CODE = (0,1,2,3) IF(NO, IMMEDIATE, 2 -CYCLE, 3 - CYCLE) TRANSITION WAS REQUESTED 0 7581 RANDOM NUMBER SEED 7781 RANDOM NUMBER SEED TO GENERATE TRAFFIC STREAM FOR NETSIM OR LEVEL I SIMULATION 7981 RANDOM NUMBER SEED TO GENERATE EMISSION HEADWAYS FOR NETSIM SIMULATION 900 DURATION (SEC) OF TIME PERIOD NO. 1 0 60 LENGTH OF A TIME INTERVAL, SECONDS 0 5 MAXIMUM INITIALIZATION TIME, NUMBER OF TIME INTERVALS 0 0 NUMBER OF TIME INTERVALS BETWEEN SUCCESSIVE STANDARD OUTPUTS 0 0 TIME INTERMEDIATE OUTPUT WILL BEGIN AT INTERVALS OF 0 SECS. FOR 0 SECS. FOR MICROSCOPIC MODELS 0 1 NETSIM MOVEMENT -SPECIFIC OUTPUT CODE _ (0,1) (IF NOT, IF) REQUESTED FOR NETSIM SUBNETWORK 0 0 NETSIM GRAPHICS OUTPUT CODE = (0,1) IF GRAPHICS OUTPUT (IS NOT, IS) REQUESTED TIME PERIOD 1 - NETSIM DATA ,t *,t,t,tt,t,t,t,t,t,t,►,t,t*,t*,t,t,t*+t+t,t,t* *,t *,t,t,t,t,t,tr,t,t,t ***,t,t,t**,t,t ** *r*,t,t,t,t,t*,ta,t,t,t***,t,t,t,t,t,t,t,t,t,t,r*,t,r,t,t,t,r,t *,r *,t,t,t *+t,t,t*,t 1 NETSIM LINKS 0 -LANES- -CHANNEL- F C U U LOST Q DIS FREE LANE LENGTH L PRT GRD LINK R DESTINATION NODE OPP. TIME HDWY. SPEED .t 0 11 RTOR PED ALIGN STREET LINK FT / M L L R PCT TYPE B234567 LEFT THRU RGHT DIAG NODE SEC SEC QUEUE DISCHARGE AND MPH/KMPH CODE CODE -MENT NAME START-UP LOST TIME 3 CLOSEDA 4 -..' ° y_"1 %.ti,�- 3 HEAVY ^ ` CHARACTERISTICS. 4 RIGHT TURNS ONLY 5 CAR - POOLS 6 ( 11 6) 1920/ 585 2 0 0 0 1* 0000000 0 8006 0 0 0 2.0* 1.8* DIAGONAL TRAFFIC ONLY 30/ 48 0 0 1-1* SW 1st Ave 12 (ALLOWED: 1000) TOTAL NON -ENTRY NODES: 8 (ALLOWED: 500) ***** WARNING - 500 - Link (7,4) may not have been specified correctly on Record Type 11. Its traffic opposes traffic on link (5,4), but no receiving link (4,5) was input. Check Record Type 11. 1 ( 11 4) 180/ 55 3 0 0 0 1* 7TT0000 0 8 7 0 0 2.0* 1.8* 30/ 48 0 0 1-1* SW 7th Stree (8002, 2) 0/ 0 3 0 0 0 1* 0000000 0 1 0 0 0 2.0* 1.8* 0/ 0 0 0 1-1* ( 2, 1) 2000/ 610 3 0 0 0 1* TT80000 6 4 0 0 0 2.0* 1.8* 30/ 48 0 0 1-1* SW 7th Stree (8003, 3) 0/ 0 3 0 0 0 1* 0000000 0 1 0 0 0 2.0* 1.8* 0/ 0 0 0 1-1* ( 3, 1) 2000/ 610 3 0 0 0 1* 47T0000 0 6 4 0 0 2.0* 1.8* 30/ 48 0 0 2-1 SWlst Ave ( 4, 8) 2000/ 610 3 0 0 0 1* 0000000 0 8008 0 0 0 2.0* 1.8* 30/ 48 0 0 1-1* SW 7th Stree ( 4, 7) 1600/ 488 1 0 0 0 1* 0000000 0 8007 0 0 0 2.0* 1.8* 30/ 48 0 0 1-1* (8005, 5) 0/ 0 2 0 0 0 1* 0000000 0 4 0 0 0 2.0* 1.8* 0/ 0 0 0 1-1* ( 51 4) 1872/ 571 2 0 0 0 1* 8100000 8 7 0 0 7 2.0* 1.8* 30/ 48 0 0 1-1* SW 1st Ct (8007, 7) 0/ 0 2 0 0 0 1* 0000000 0 4 0 0 0 2.0* 1.8* 0/ 0 0 0 1-1* ( 7, 4) 1600/ 488 2 0 0 0 1* 4400000 0 0 8 0 5 2.0* 1.8* 30/ 48 0 0 1-1* LINK TYPE PEDESTRIAN CODES * INDICATES DEFAULT VALUES WERE SPECIFIED LANE CHANNELIZATION CODES RTOR CODES IDENTIFIES THE 0 UNRESTRICTED 0 RTOR PERMITTED 0 NO PEDESTRIANS DISTRIBUTION USED FOR 1 LEFT TURNS ONLY 1 RTOR PROHIBITED 1 LIGHT QUEUE DISCHARGE AND 2 BUSES ONLY 2 MODERATE START-UP LOST TIME 3 CLOSEDA 4 -..' ° y_"1 %.ti,�- 3 HEAVY ^ ` CHARACTERISTICS. 4 RIGHT TURNS ONLY 5 CAR - POOLS 6 CAR - POOLS + BUSES 7 RIGHT TURNS + RIGHT DIAGONAL AND/OR THROUGH 8 LEFT TURNS + LEFT DIAGONAL AND/OR THROUGH 9 ALL PERMITTED MOVEMENTS WITH RESPECT TO THE GEOMETRY AND ADJACENT LANE CHANNELIZATIONS D DIAGONAL TRAFFIC ONLY T THROUGH TRAFFIC ONLY TOTAL LINKS: 12 (ALLOWED: 1000) TOTAL NON -ENTRY NODES: 8 (ALLOWED: 500) ***** WARNING - 500 - Link (7,4) may not have been specified correctly on Record Type 11. Its traffic opposes traffic on link (5,4), but no receiving link (4,5) was input. Check Record Type 11. 1 NETSIM TURNING MOVEMENT DATA TURN MOVEMENT PERCENTAGES TURN MOVEMENT POSSIBLE POCKET LENGTH (IN FEET/METERS) LINK LEFT THROUGH RIGHT DIAGONAL LEFT THROUGH RIGHT DIAGONAL LEFT RIGHT �3- �� ( 1, 6) 0 100 0 0 NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 1, 4) 0 100 0 0 NO YES YES NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 (8002, 2) 0 100 0 0 NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 2, 1) 5 95 0 0 YES YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 (8003, 3) 0 100 0 0 NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 3, 1) 0 49 51 0 NO YES YES NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 4, 8) 0 100 0 0 NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 4, 7) 0 100 0 0 NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 (8005, 5) 0 100 0 0 NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 5, 4) 100 0 0 0 YES YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 (8007, 7) 0 100 0 0 NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 7, 4) 0 0 100 0 NO NO YES NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 1 SPECIFIED FIXED—TIME SIGNAL CONTROL, AND SIGN CONTROL, CODES 0 NODE 1 OFFSET 0 SEC CYCLE LENGTH 80 SEC 0 INTERVAL DURATION +— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — APPP,nC NUMBER (SEC) (PCT) ( 2, 1) ( 3, 1) ., 1 36 45 2 s 9 A 3 33 41 1 2 4 6 7 0 2 NODE 2 IS UNDER SIGN CONTROL 0 INTERVAL DURATION +— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — APPROACHES --— — — — — — — NUMBER (SEC) (PCT) (8002, 2) 1 0 100 1 0 NODE 3 IS UNDER SIGN CONTROL 0 INTERVAL DURATION +— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — APPROACHES — — — — — — — — NUMBER (SEC) (PCT) (8003, 3) 1 0 100 1 0 NODE 4 IS UNDER SIGN CONTROL 0 INTERVAL DURATION +— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — APPROACHES — — — — — — — — NUMBER (SEC) (PCT) ( 5, 4) ( 1, 4) ( 7, 4) 1 0 100 5 1 5 0 NODE 5 IS UNDER SIGN CONTROL 0 INTERVAL DURATION +— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — APPROACHES — — — — — — — — NUMBER (SEC) (PCT) (8005, 5) 1 0 100 1 W NODE 6 IS UNDER SIGN CONTROL 0, INTERVAL DURATION +— — — — — — — — — — — — — - — APPROACHES — — — — — — — — NUMBER (SEC) (PCT) ( 1, 6) 1 0 100 1 0 NODE 7 IS UNDER SIGN CONTROL 0 INTERVAL DURATION +— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — APPROACHES — — — — — — — — NUMBER (SEC) (PCT) (8007, 7) ( 4, 7) 1 0 100 1 1 0 NODE 8 IS UNDER SIGN CONTROL 0 INTERVAL DURATION +— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — APPROACHES — — — — — — — - NUMBER (SEC) (PCT) ( 4, 8) 03-� 1 0 100 1 1 INTERPRETATION OF SIGNAL CODES 0 YIELD OR AMBER 1 GREEN 2 RED 3 RED WITH GREEN RIGHT ARROW 4 RED WITH GREEN LEFT ARROW 5 STOP 6 RED WITH GREEN DIAGONAL ARROW 7 NO TURNS -GREEN THRU ARROW 8 RED WITH LEFT AND RIGHT GREEN ARROW 9 NO LEFT TURN -GREEN THRU AND RIGHT 1 TRAFFIC CONTROL TABLE - SIGNS AND FIXED TIME SIGNALS CONTROL CODES GO - PROTECTED NOGO = NOT PERMITTED AMBR = AMBER PERM = PERMITTED NOT PROTECTED PROT = PROTECTED STOP = STOP SIGN YLD - YIELD SIGN NODE 1 FIXED TIME CONTROL OFFSET = 0 SECONDS CYCLE LENGTH = 80 SECONDS INTERVAL DURATION -------------------------=----------------- APPROACHES -------------------------------------------- 2, 1) ( 3, 1) LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG 1 36 NOGO NOGO GO GO 2 5 NOGO NOGO AMBR AMBR 3 33 PROT GO NOGO NOGO 4 6 AMBR AMBR NOGO NOGO NODE 2 SIGN CONTROL INTERVAL DURATION ------------------------------------------- APPROACHES -------------------------------------------- (8002, 2) LEFT THRU RITE DIAL LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAL 1 0 GO NODE 3 SIGN CONTROL INTERVAL DURATION --------•---------------------------------- APPROACHES -------------------------------------------- (8003, 3) LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAD LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG 1 0 GO 03. 811 NODE 4 SIGN CONTROL INTERVAL DURATION ------------------------------------------- APPROACHES -------------------------------------------- ( 5, 4) { 1, 4) ( 7, 4) LEFT THRU RITE DIAL LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG 1 0 STOP STOP GO GO STOP NODE 5 SIGN CONTROL INTERVAL DURATION ------------------------------------------- APPROACHES -------------------------------------------- (8005, 5) LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG 1 0 GO Submitted 1ntoN the public NODE 6 SIGN CONTROL INTERVAL DURATION ------------------------------------------- APPROACHES -------------------------------------------- ( 1, 6) LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG 1 0 GO NODE 7 SIGN CONTROL INTERVAL DURATION ------------------------------------------- APPROACHES -------------------------------------------- (8007, 7) ( 4, 7) LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG 1 0 GO GO NODE 8 SIGN CONTROL INTERVAL DURATION ------------------------------------------- APPROACHES -------------------------------------------- 4, 8) LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG 1 0 GO ENTRY LINK VOLUMES LINK FLOW RATE TRUCKS CAR POOLS HOV VIOLATORS (VEH/HOUR) (PERCENT) (PERCENT) (PERCENT) (8002, 2) 1558 2 0 1.00 (8003, 3) 649 2 0 1.00 (8005, 5) 62 2 0 1.00 (8007, 7) 5 2 0 1.00 NETSIM VEHICLE TYPE SPECIFICATIONS VEHICLE LENGTH Q DSCHG HDWY F EET COMPONENT PERCENTAGES PERF. FEET 5* / 2 FEET 12* / 4 FEET 12* / TYPE FEET/METERS FACTOR (PCT) AVG. OCCUP. AUTO TRUCK CARPOOL BUS INDEX 1** 16.0/ 4.9 100 1.3 75 0 0 0 2 2** 35.0/ 10.7 120 1.2 0 100 0 0 3 3** 16.0/ 4.9 100 2.5 0 0 100 0 2 4** 40.0/ 12.2 120 25.0 0 0 0 100 7 5** 14.0/ 4.3 100 1.3 25 0 0 0 1 6** 53.0/ 16.2 120 1.2 0 0 0 0 4 7** 53.0/ 16.2 120 1.2 0 0 0 0 5 8** 64.0/ 19.5 120 1.2 0 0 0 0 6 9** 14.0/ 4.3 100 2.5 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 UNITS ** INDICATES THAT ALL PARAMETERS FOR VEHICLE TYPE ASSUME DEFAULT VALUES DEFAULT LINK GEOMETRIC DATA WIDTH OF LANES 12 FEET LONGITUDINAL DISTANCE FROM THE STOP 4 FEET LINE TO THE NEAR CURB EhliC FORWARD SIGHT DISTANCE AT STOP LINE 1000 FEET LANE CHANGE DATA PARAMETERS VALUE DURATION OF LANE CHANGE MANEUVER SECONDS MEAN DRIVER REACTION TIME OF A SECOND TIME REQUIRED FOR SUCCESSIVE LANE CHANGES OF A SECOND DECELERATION AT BEGINNING OF LANE CHANGE MANEUVER [METERS] / SECOND**2 DIFFERENCE IN VEHICLE'S DECELERATION OVER THE DISTANCE BETWEEN ITS POSITION WHEN IT BEGINS TO RESPOND TO AN OBSTRUCTION AND THE POSITION OF THE OBSTRUCTION - FOR MANDATORY LANE CHANGE: [METERS] / SECOND**2 FOR DISCRETIONARY LANE CHANGE: [METERS] / SECOND**2 PANIC DECELERATION RATE OF LEAD VEHICLE FOR COMPUTATION OF CAR -FOLLOWING LAW '[METERS] / SECOND**2 PANIC DECELERATION RATE OF FOLLOWER VEHICLE FOR COMPUTATION OF CAR -FOLLOWING LAW [METERS] / SECOND**2 ENGLISH / METRIC 3* 10* TENTHS 20* TENTHS 5* / 2 FEET 10* / 3 FEET 5* / 2 FEET 12* / 4 FEET 12* / 4 FEET 03- 811 DRIVER TYPE FACTOR USED TO COMPUTE DRIVER AGGRESSIVENESS URGENCY THRESHOLD SECONDS**2 / FEET [METERS] SAFETY FACTOR. FOR COMPUTATION OF PERCEIVED RISK OF LANE CHANGE * 10 PERCENT OF DRIVERS WHO COOPERATE WITH A LANE CHANGER HEADWAY BELOW WHICH ALL DRIVERS WILL ATTEMPT TO CHANGE LANES OF A SECOND HEADWAY ABOVE WHICH NO DRIVERS WILL ATTEMPT TO CHANGE LANES OF A SECOND FORWARD DISTANCE SCANNED BY DRIVER FOR A TURN MOVEMENT / BUS STATION IN ORDER TO ASSESS NEED FOR A LANE CHANGE [METERS] 25* 2* / 1 10 8* FACTOR * INDICATES DEFAULT VALUES WERE SPECIFIED 24* TENTHS 20 30 MAXIMUM ACCELERATION -------------------------- TABLE 50* t. T #t$S 300* / 91 FEET / * INDICATES DEFAULT VALUES WERE SPECIFIED GRADE CORRECTION FACTORS FOR ACCELERATION (USED BY FRESIM ONLY) PERFORMANCE 0 10 20 30 MAXIMUM ACCELERATION -------------------------- TABLE 60 70 SO 90 PERFORMANCE 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 FT/SSC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC ----- ------ INDEX FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC ----- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 1 8.00 9.00 6.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 .31 .31 .31 .31 .31 .31 .31 2 6.00 12.00 10.00 8.00 7.00 6.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 .27 .28 .28 .30 .31 3 4.69 5.35 4.94 3.47 3.09 2.61 2.14 1.70 1.27 .86 .46 .06 .31 4 2.81 2.42 2.15 2.04 1.74 1.42 1.12 .83 .56 .30 .04 -.23 5 2.76 2.37 1.81 1.56 1.25 .97 .73 .52 .32 .14 -.05 -.23 6 2.45 2.14 1.42 1.12 .85 .63 .44 .29 .14 .00 -.14 -.27 7 7.47 5.33 3.17 2.66 2.29 1.65 1.40 .95 .75 .50 -.33 -.35 GRADE CORRECTION FACTORS FOR ACCELERATION (USED BY FRESIM ONLY) PERFORMANCE 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 SO 90 100 110 INDEX FT/SEC FT/SSC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC ----- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 1 .31 .31 .31 .31 .31 .31 .31 .31 .31 .31 .31 .31 2 .31 .31 .31 .31 .31 .31 .31 .31 .31 .31 .31 .31 3 .21 .21 .21 .22 .23 .25 .26 .27 .28 .28 .30 .31 "y - 4 4 .16 .15 .19 .22 .24 .25 .27 � .31 .31 .31 5 .18 .17 .20 .23 .25 .27 .28 .30 .31 .31 .31 .31 6 .18 .18 .22 .25 .27 .29 .30 .30 .31 .31 3 .31 .31 7 .27 .27 .27 .27 .27 .29 .29 .30 .30 .30 .30 .30 GRADE CORRECTION FACTORS FOR FUEL CONSUMPTION (USED BY FRESIM ONLY) ------------------------------------------------------------------- PERFORMANCE 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 INDEX FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC ----- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 1 .31 .31 .31 .31 .31 .31 .31 .31 .31 .31 .31 .31 2 .31 .31 .31 .31 .31 .31 .31 .31 .31 .31 .31 .31 3 .26 .26 .26 .28 .29 .30 .30 .30 .30 .30 .30 .30 4 .11 .11 .23 .27 .28 .29 .30 .30 .30 .30 .30 .30 5 .16 .16 .26 .28 .29 .30 .30 .30 .30 .30 .30 .30 6 .20 .20 .28 .29 .30 .30 .30 .30 .31 .31 .31 .31 7 .27 .27 .27 .27 .27 .29 .29 .30 .30 .30 .30 .30 ***** WARNING - 400 - An inconsistency exists between the length of link (4,8) input on Record Type 11 or Record Type 19 and the length of this link computed from node coordinate data input for nodes 4 and 8 on Record Type 195. The length input was 2000, and the length computed from node coordinate data is 2432. ***** WARNING - 400 - An inconsistency exists between the length of link (1,4) input on Record Type 11 or Record Type 19 and the length of this link computed from node coordinate data input for nodes 1 and 4 on Record Type 195. The length input was 180, and the length computed from node coordinate data is 1792. ***** WARNING - 400 - An inconsistency exists between the length of link (3,1) input on Record Type 11 or Record Type 19 and the length of this link computed from node coordinate data input for nodes 3 and 1 on Record Type 195. The length input was 2000, and the length computed from node coordinate data is 2661. ***** WARNING - 400 - An inconsistency exists between the length of link (2,1) input on Record . Type 11 or Record Type 19 and the length of this link computed from node coordinate data input for nodes 2 and 1 on Record Type 195. The length input was 2000, and the length computed from node coordinate data is 3024. **** THERE WERE 5 WARNING MESSAGES IN DATA. t SOURCE SINK FLOW RATES fitt BEGIN TIME FLOW RATE CENTROID LINK (MINUTES) (VEH/HOUR) (2000) ( 11 4) 0 45 (2000) ( 11 4) 15 45 1 INITIALIZATION STATISTICS TIME INTERVAL SUBNETWORK PRIOR CONTENT CURRENT CONTENT PERCENT NUMBER TYPE (VEHICLES) (VEHICLES) DIFFERENCE 03- 811 VEH-MINS * AVERAGE -- CONGESTION -- H (VEHICLE) ------------ NUMBER QUEUE STOP OCCUPANCY STORAGE PHASE MAXIMUM QUEUE BY LANE OF LANE LINK TIME TIME (VEHICLE) M FAILURE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 CHANGES ( 1, 6) .1 .0 6.1 3.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 ------------ Q U E U E L E N G T AVERAGE QUEUE BY LANE ** 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C -n X8..7 AF4'°,,,9 {y ilAy p•,^,. t 4:e PA'SGiz3a A' "1000f1 1 2 NETSIM NETSIM 0 34 60 City Glee( 3 NETSIM 60 83 38 4 NETSIM 83 76 8 5 NETSIM 76 67 11 INITIALIZATION TIME EXHAUSTED, SIMULATION WILL BE PERFORMED ANYWAY 1 CUMULATIVE NETSIM STATISTICS AT TIME 12:15: 0 ELAPSED TIME IS 0:15: 0 ( 900 SECONDS), TIME PERIOD 1 ELAPSED TIME IS 900 SECONDS VEHICLE MINUTES RATIO MINUTES/MILE -------- SECONDS / VEHICLE --------- - AVERAGE VALUES - VEHICLE MOVE DELAY TOTAL MOVE/ TOTAL DELAY TOTAL DELAY CONTROL QUEUE STOP* STOPS VOL SPEED LINK MILES TRIPS TIME TIME TIME TOTAL TIME TIME TIME TIME DELAY DELAY ---- TIME (%) VPH MPH ------------------------------- ----- ------------- ------------------------------------- ( 1, 6) 38.55 ------------------- 106 77.1 9.5 86.6 .89 2.25 .25 49.0 5.4 .0 .1 .0 0 424 26.7 ( 1, 4) 15.26 452 30.5 8.8 39.4 .78 2.58 .58 5.2 1.2 .0 .0 .0 0 1808 23.3 (8002, 2) 389 1556 ( 2, 1) 146.97 388 293.9 120.2 414.1 .71 2.82 .82 61.9 17.7 15.2 13.0 12.2 59 1552 21.3 (8003, 3) 161 644 ( 3, 1) 60.61 160 121.2 35.6 156.9 .77 2.59 .59 57.5 13.1 10.9 9.7 9.3 57 640 23.2 ( 4, 8) 175.00 462 350.0 48.8 398.8 .88 2.28 .28 49.6 6.1 .0 .0 .0 0 1848 26.3 ( 4, 7) .00 0 .0 .0 .0 .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 0 0 .0 (8005, 5) 15 60 ( 5, 4) 5.67 16 11.3 4.8 16.1 .70 2.85 .85 57.1 17.0 11.2 10.6 10.5 100 64 21.1 (8007, 7) 1 4 ( 7, 4) .30 1 .6 .0 .6 1.00 1.92 .00 35.0 .0 1.3 2.0 2.0 100 4 31.2 OSUBNETWORK- 442.35 568 14.74 3.80 18.54 .80 2.51 .51 1.78 .36 .22 .19 .18 59.5 23.9 -- VEHICLE - HOURS -- --- MINUTES / VEHICLE - TRIP --- PER TRIP 1 CUMULATIVE NETSIM STATISTICS AT TIME 12:15: 0 ELAPSED TIME IS 0:15: 0 ( 900 SECONDS), TIME PERIOD 1 ELAPSED TIME IS 900 SECONDS VEH-MINS * AVERAGE -- CONGESTION -- H (VEHICLE) ------------ NUMBER QUEUE STOP OCCUPANCY STORAGE PHASE MAXIMUM QUEUE BY LANE OF LANE LINK TIME TIME (VEHICLE) M FAILURE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 CHANGES ( 1, 6) .1 .0 6.1 3.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 ------------ Q U E U E L E N G T AVERAGE QUEUE BY LANE ** 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ( 1, 4) .2 .0 2.9 10.8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 LANE 4 LANE 5 LANE 6 LANE 7 ( 2, 1) 88.8 83.5 28.0 9.3 0 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 8 8 8 0 0 0 0 143 --- --- --- --- --- ( 1, 6) 48 ( 3, 232 1) 27.9 26.9 10.9 3.6 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 4 3 4 0 0 0 0 35 186 744 153 612 118 472 ( 4, 0 8) .1 .0 27.5 9.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 164 508 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ( 4, 7) .0 .0 .0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ( 51 4, 4) 3.0 3.0 1.8 1.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 ( 4, 7) 0 ( 7, 0 4) .0 .0 .1 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 60 1 4 0 0 OSUBNETWORR= 120.1 113.4 77.3 5.3 0 376 0 1 4 0 0 0 �`` 0 0 0 0 0 * THESE VALUES INCLUDE THE TIME FOR VEHICLES CURRENTLY ON THE LINK. if em p2.-ttI ** AVERAGE QUEUE CALCULATED BASED ON TIME SINCE BEGINNING OF SIMULATION �J f d� Ea.s'L:Z fav �7 1 CUMULATIVE NETSIM STATISTICS AT TIME 12:15: 0 ELAPSED TIME IS 0:15: 0 ( 900 SECONDS), TIME PERIOD 1 ELAPSED TIME IS 900 SECONDS DISCHARGE BY LANE LANE 1 LANE 2 LANE 3 LANE 4 LANE 5 LANE 6 LANE 7 LINK VEH VPH VEH VPH VER VPH VEH VPH VEH VPH VER VPH ---- VEH VPH --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ( 1, 6) 48 192 58 232 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ( 1, 4) 186 744 153 612 118 472 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ( 2, 1) 125 500 136 544 127 508 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ( 3, 1) 56 224 53 212 51 204 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ( 4, 8) 161 644 175 700 126 504 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ( 4, 7) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ( 5, 4) 15 60 1 4 0 0 SubMitted Ire$® the pi.l�Ii(, 0 ( 0 7, 4) 0 o 0 records i"� conr1 � 0 1 4 0 0 0 �`` 0 0 0 0 0 if em p2.-ttI �J f d� Ea.s'L:Z fav �7 1 NETSIM PERSON MEASURES OF EFFECTIVENESS LINK PERSON PERSON DELAY TRAVEL TIME MILE TRIPS PERSON -MIN 'PERSON -MIN ( 11 6) 50.1 137.8 12.4 112.6 ( 11 4) 19.8 586.5 11.5 1 0 LINK SPEED (MPH ) VEHICLE -MILE y gyp. M1 STOPS (PCT) THRU RIGHT 0 106 0 .0 26.7 .0 0 LEFT 51.1 RIGHT LEFT THRU 0 0 ( 2, 1) 190.8 503.7 6) 0 .00 38.55 .00 .0 .0 537.6 .0 0 89 ( 11 ( 3, 1) 78.6 207.6 .00 203.5 .0 26.3 .0 0 0 0 ( 4, 8) 227.0 599.4 63.3 517.3 ( 2, 1) 0 4.92 ( 4, 7) .0 .0 .0 .0 0 (8003, 3) ( 51 4) 7.4 20.8 6.2 21.0 1) .00 33.71 26.89 .0 ( 7, 4) .4 1.3 .0 .8 ( 4, 8) RIGHT .00 1 *** NOTE *** TIME PERIOD 1 SPECIFIC NETSIM STATISTICS ARE THE SAME AS CUMULATIVE OUTPUT AT THE END OF TIME PERIOD 1. .00 .0 86.62 .00 1 0 LINK SPEED (MPH ) VEHICLE -MILE THRU STOPS (PCT) THRU RIGHT 0 106 0 .0 26.7 .0 0 LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU 0 RIGHT 0 ( 11 6) 0 .00 38.55 .00 .0 .0 0 .0 0 89 ( 11 4) 22.1 .00 15.26 .00 .0 .0 26.3 .0 0 0 0 .0 (8002, 2) 0 15 0 ( 2, 1) 0 4.92 142.05 .00 61.5 58.9 1 .0 0 (8003, 3) .0 .0 31.2 NETSIM MOVEMENT SPECIFIC STATISTICS ( 3, 1) .00 33.71 26.89 .0 55.1 60.6 (VEH-MINS) (VEH-MINS) ( 4, 8) RIGHT .00 175.00 .00 .0 .0 .00 .0 86.62 .00 .00 8.55 ( 4, 7) 39.37 .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 399.03 .0 (8005, 5) ( 51 4) 5.67 .00 .00 100.0 .0 .0 (8007, 7) ( 7, 4) .00 .00 .30 .0 .0 .0 1 LINK MOVING TIME RATIO MOVE/TOTAL (VEH-MINS) (VEH-MINS) LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT ( 11 6) .00 77.09 .00 .00 .89 .00 ( 11 4) .00 30.82 .00 ".00 .78 .00 (8002, 2) ( 2, 1) 9.85 284.09 .00 .65 .71 .00 (8003, 3) NETSIM MOVEMENT SPECIFIC STATISTICS - TABLE I VEHICLE -TRIPS SPEED (MPH ) LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT 0 106 0 .0 26.7 .0 0 452 0 .0 23.3 .0 0 389 0 13 375 0 19.5 21.4 .0 0 161 0 0 89 71 .0 22.1 24.7 0 462 0 .0 26.3 .0 0 0 0 .0 .0 .0 0 15 0 16 0 0 21.1 .0 .0 0 1 0 0 0 1 .0 .0 31.2 NETSIM MOVEMENT SPECIFIC STATISTICS - TABLE II DELAY TIME TOTAL TIME (VEH-MINS) (VEH-MINS) LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT .00 9.53 .00 .00 86.62 .00 .00 8.55 .00 .00 39.37 .00 5.27 114.94 .00 15.12 399.03 .00 1 ( 3, 1) .00 67.42 53.79 .00 24.09 11.55 .00 91.52 65.33 .00 .74 8 .82 5 1 GALLONS VEHICLE TYPE- .00 5 16.41 ( 4, 8) .00 350.00 .00 .00 48.75 .00 .00 398.75 .00 .00 .88 .00 .00 1, 6) .00 .63 16.22 .99 .00 ( 4, 7) .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 4, .00 .00 2.52 16.17 4.10 1.07 .00 .00 (8005, 5) .00 .00 ( 4, ( 5, 4) 11.35 .00 .00 4.80 .00 .00 16.15 .00 .00 .70 .00 .00 ( 51 4) (8007, 7) .16 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 7, 4) .00 .00 .61 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .61 .00 .00 .23 1.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 1 ( 3, 1) NETSIM.MOVEMENT SPECIFIC STATISTICS - TABLE III LINK .27 .00 TOTAL TIME DELAY TIME .00 QUEUE TIME** STOP TIME** ( 2, 1) 2.37 4.39 .58 .00 .00 (SECS/VEH) .00 (SECS/VEH) (VEH-MINS) (VEH-MINS) LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT ( 11 6) .0 49.0 .0 .0 5.4 .0 .0 .1 .0 .0 .0 .0 ( 11 4) .0 5.2 .0 .0 1.1 .0 .0 .2 .0 .0 .0 .0 (8002, 2) ( 2, 1) 69.8 63.8 .0 24.3 18.4 .0 3.5 85.2 .0 3.4 80.1 .0 (8003, 3) ' ( 3, 1) .0 61.7 55.2 .0 16.2 9.8 .0 18.8 9.1 .0 18.3 8.6 ( 4, 8) .0 51.8 .0 .0 6.3 .0 Q,M., p b!1c: .0 .0 .0 .0 �9�1 ( 4, 7) .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .00 .0 .0 .0 .0 (8005, 5) ( 5, 4) 60.6 .0 .0 18.0 .0 .0 3.0' .0 3.0 .0 .0 c ,. (8007, 7) ( 7, 4) .0 .0 35.0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 ** TIME FOR VEHICLES CURRENTLY ON THE LINK ARE INCLUDED IN THESE VALUES. 1 NETSIM CUMULATIVE VALUES OF FUEL CONSUMPTION FUEL LINK M.P.G. 7 8 4 5 1 GALLONS VEHICLE TYPE- .00 5 16.41 1 2 6 6 .00 7 8 4.21 4 .00 .00 .00 ( 1, 6) .00 .63 16.22 .99 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 1.47 .00 .00 .00 17.91 ( 4, 8) .00 2.52 16.17 4.10 1.07 .00 .00 Z7 .00 .00 .00 ( 4, 7) .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 51 4) .07 .16 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 1, 4) .68 1.05 .23 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 3, 1) .85 1.61 .27 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 2, 1) 2.37 4.39 .58 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 NETSIM CUMULATIVE VALUES OF FUEL CONSUMPTION FUEL CONSUMPTION M.P.G. 7 8 4 5 1 2 .00 .00 .00 16.41 27.54 .00 .00 .00 .00 19.07 30.93 4.21 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 16.22 26.14 .00 .00 .00 .00 5.89 10.02 1.47 .00 .00 .00 17.91 27.05 5.49 .00 .00 .00 16.17 23.85 4.48 Z7 e3 0 Ai 1 ( 7, 4) .00 .01 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 29.23 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 SUBNETWORK- 7.12 12.31 2.15 .00 .00 .00 .00 16.45 25.78 4.16 .00 .00 .00 .00 VEHICLE TYPES 1, 5 = AUTO, VEHICLE TYPES 2, 6, 7, 8 = TRUCK, VEHICLE TYPE 4 = BUS 1 NETSIM CUMULATIVE VALUES OF EMISSION LINK VEHICLE EMISSIONS (GRAMS/ MILE) HC VEHICLE TYPE- 5 1 2 6 7 8 4 ( 11 6) .07 .08 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 4, 8) .04 .04 7.01 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 4, 7) .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 5, 4) .07 .06 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 11 4) .43 .57 21.35 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 3, 1) .05 .06 5.11 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 2, 1) .07 .09 6.37 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 7, 4) .00 .10 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 SUBNETWORK- .07 .08 7.04 .00 .00 .00 .00 VEHICLE TYPES 1, 5 = AUTO, VEHICLE TYPES 2, 6, 7, 8 = TRUCK, VEHICLE TYPE 4 = TRANSIT BUS 1 NETSIM CUMULATIVE VALUES OF ISSION Submitted Into the public i42Aord LINK VEHICLE EMISSIONS (GRAMS/ eiO P2.t VEHICLE TYPE- 5 1 2 6 f r; A -� , rwr 4 . j ( 1, 6) 5.19 6.43 .00 .00 .00 w city coes-t°m .00 ( 4, 8) 3.63 3.83 107.17 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 4, 7) .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 5, 4) 5.31 6.18 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 1, 4) 24.63 42.91 357.56 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 3, 1) 4.97 5.58 73.04 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 2, 1) 5.78 7.28 92.72 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 7, 4) .00 8.35 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 SUBNETWORK- 5.38 6.76 106.49 .00 .00 .00 .00 VEHICLE TYPES 1, 5 = AUTO, VEHICLE TYPES 2, 6, 7, 8 = TRUCK, VEHICLE TYPE 4 - TRANSIT BUS 1 NETSIM CUMULATIVE VALUES OF EMISSION LINK VEHICLE EMISSIONS (GRAMS/ MILE') NO VEHICLE TYPE- 5 1 2 6 7 8 4 0:3- 811 THE HIGHEST NUMBER OF VEHICLES ON THE NETWORK WAS 95 VEHICLES (MAXIMUM ALLOWED IS 20000). THIS MAXIMUM OCCURRED AT 845 SECONDS. ------------------------------- NETWORK-WIDE AVERAGE STATISTICS ------------------------------- TOTAL VEHICLE- MILE = 442.35 VEHICLE -HOURS OF: MOVE TIME = 14.74 , DELAY TIME 3.80 , TOTAL TIME = 18.54 AVERAGE SPEED ( MPH)= 23.86 MOVE/TOTAL = .80 .51 , TOTAL TIME = 2.51 NETWORK -WIDE STATISTICS FOR SCRIPT PROCESSING 442.35, 14.74, 3.80, 18.54, 23.86, .80, TOTAL CPU TIME FOR SIMULATION = 1.79 SECONDS TOTAL CPU TIME FOR THIS RUN = 1.79 SECONDS 0***** THERE WERE 5 WARNING MESSAGES. OLAST CASE PROCESSED MINUTES/MILE OF: DELAY TIME _ .51, 2.51 023- sig. ( 11 6) .36 .27 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 4, 8) .20 .15 15.09 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 4, 7) .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 51 4) .35 .20 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 11 4) 2.41 1.98 57.18 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 3, 1) .24 .21 10.25 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 2, 1) .31 .31 12.86 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 7, 4) .00 .31 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 SUBNETWORK- .33 .28 15.19 .00 .00 .00 .00 VEHICLE TYPES 1, 5 = AUTO, VEHICLE TYPES 2, 6, 7, 8 = TRUCK, VEHICLE TYPE 4 = TRANSIT BUS THE HIGHEST NUMBER OF VEHICLES ON THE NETWORK WAS 95 VEHICLES (MAXIMUM ALLOWED IS 20000). THIS MAXIMUM OCCURRED AT 845 SECONDS. ------------------------------- NETWORK-WIDE AVERAGE STATISTICS ------------------------------- TOTAL VEHICLE- MILE = 442.35 VEHICLE -HOURS OF: MOVE TIME = 14.74 , DELAY TIME 3.80 , TOTAL TIME = 18.54 AVERAGE SPEED ( MPH)= 23.86 MOVE/TOTAL = .80 .51 , TOTAL TIME = 2.51 NETWORK -WIDE STATISTICS FOR SCRIPT PROCESSING 442.35, 14.74, 3.80, 18.54, 23.86, .80, TOTAL CPU TIME FOR SIMULATION = 1.79 SECONDS TOTAL CPU TIME FOR THIS RUN = 1.79 SECONDS 0***** THERE WERE 5 WARNING MESSAGES. OLAST CASE PROCESSED MINUTES/MILE OF: DELAY TIME _ .51, 2.51 023- sig. NEO VERTIKA MUSP Traffic Analysis APPENDIX D Future (2005) Level of Service Calculations with the Project 1 items Q w 4r� � � city Clerk JA3241 \Draft Report. DOC 4 3/25/03 03— U 1 1 NEO VERTIKA MUSP Traffic Analysis JA3241\Draft Report. DOC 3/25/03 APPENDIX E Calculation of Project's Internal Capture Rate �Dfr"?t�, thepublic :,--7-t�-o3 .,. 03- 8il G1 Neo MUSP J 7th Street / SW 1 st Court Future, With Project 2/20/2003 * Lane Configurations ttT +T Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 0 1794 72 60 45 0 0 0 66 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Hourly flow rate (veh/h) 0 0 0 0 1966 79 66 49 0 0 0 72 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right>turn flare (veh) Mediantype, None None Median storage veh) . VC, conflicting volume 2045 0 728 2045 0 2030 2005 695 vC 1, stage 1 cont vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s). 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 p0 queue free % 100 100 74 11 100 100 100 81 cM capacity (veh/h) 272 1622 253 55 1084 8 59 385 Direction', :Lane # " W,8:,A WB : 13 3 NB'l . KB:2 5B 1. SB 2 Volume Total 786 786 472 44 71 36 36 Volume Left 0 0 0 44 22 0 0 Volume Right 0 0 79 0 0 36 36 cSH 1700 1700 1700 253 73 385 385 Volume to Capacity 0.46 0.46 0.28 0.17 0.98 0.09 0.09 Queue Length (ft) 0 0 0 15 126 8 8 Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 22.2 196.0 15.3 15.3 Lane LOS C F C C Approach Delay (s) 0.0 129.8 15.3 Approach LOS F C iritersectton: is m ma ry � Average Delay 7.2 Intersection Capacity Utilization 56.4% ICU Level of Service A HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Synchro 5 Report 'J:\3241\NeoFutureWith.sy6 Page 1 thecorftla-sx51 03- 811 Neo MUSP S1 'th Street/ SW 1st Avenue Future, With Project 2/20/2003 IV[ovement ..,; . EBL EBT , EB.R WBL U1lBT VIBR N[3L ' fiIBT ,NBR: SQL' S,$T. SBR Lane Configurations v/c Ratio 0.78 0.36 0.35 *`tt` 19.2 13.9 13.8 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 12 12 11 11 11 12 12 12 12 11 11 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 Frt 1.00 0.95 0.85 Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. flow (prot) 4903 3103 1393 Fit Permitted 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 4903 3103 1393 Volume (vph) 0 0 0. 81 1422 0 0 0 0 0 301 365 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Growth Factor (vph) 100% 100% 100% 105% 105% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 105% 105% Adj. Flow (vph) 0 0 0 90 1588 0 0 0 0 0 336 408 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 0 0 1678 0 0 0 0 0 521 223 Turn Type Perm Perm Protected Phases 8 6 Permitted Phases 8 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 33.0 36.0 36.0 Effective Green, g (s) 35.0 37.0 37.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.44 0.46 0.46 Clearance Time (s) 6.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2145 1435 644 v/s Ratio Prot c0.17 v/s Ratio Perm c0.34 0.16 v/c Ratio 0.78 0.36 0.35 Uniform Delay, d1 19.2 13.9 13.8 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 2.9 0.7 1.5 . Delay (s) 22.2 14.6 15.2 Level of Service C B B Approach Delay (s) 0.0 22.2 0.0 14.8 Approach LOS A C A B (rltersectfon .Surmna A A A '-' 5 d-I8}b J4.,.G ai.,rBIS HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Synchro 5 Report "J:\3241\NeoFutureWith.sy6 Page 1 thecorftla-sx51 03" 811 INPUT FILE NAME: C:\TSIS Projects\NEO MUSP\N@oFutureWith.TRF RUN DATE : 02/20/03 TTTTTTTTTTT RRRRRRRRR AAAAAAA 00 FFFFFFFFFFF TTTTTTTTTTT RRRRRRRRRR AAAAAAAAA 3 FFFFFFFFFFF TTTTTTTTTTT RRRRRRRRRRR AAAAAAAAAAA. 900 FFFFFFFFFFF TTT RRR RRR AAA AAA FFF TTT RRR RRR AAA AAA FFF TTT RRRRRRRRRRR AAAAAAAAAAA 8 FFFFFFF TTT RRRRRRRRRR AAAAAAAAAAA 2 1SW 7th Stree FFFFFFF TTT RRR RRR AAA AAA FFF TTT RRR RRR AAA AAA FFF TTT RRR RRR AAA AAA FFF TTT RRR RRR AAA AAA FFF TTT RRR RRR AAA AAA FFF Sub recoa' item To" I city Clerk VERSION 5.0 RELEASE DATE MAY 2001 TRAP SIMULATION MODEL DEVELOPED FOR U. S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION FHWA OFFICE OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND TECHNOLOGY 1 CARD FILE LIST OSEQ.#:----+----1----+----2----+----3----+----4----+----5----+----6----+----7----+----8 1 :Synchro File: 3':\3241\NeoFutureWith.sy6, Date:Feb 20, 2003 00 2 02 20 03 01 3 1 5 7981 01 0 0 0 31200 7781 7581 02 4 900 03 5 60 04 6 1 Neoput 05 7 1 6SW 1st Ave •10 8 1 4SW 7th Stree 10 9 2 1SW 7th Stree 10 10 3 1SWlst Ave 10 it 5 4SW 1st Ct 36 52 8 1 36 53 10 12 4 8SW 7th Stree 54 :8003 3 699 2 0 50 55 :8005 5 108 10 13 1 61920 7 68 2 50 0 :2000 8006 30 0 11 14 1 4 180 170 3 : 1 0 7TT 8 7 30 00 11 15 :8002 2 3 3 15224 0 62 1 13546 00 11 16 : 2 12000 10952 3 64 0 TT8 6 4 30 00 11 17 :8003 3 66 3 11114 0 195 1 1 00 11 18 : 3 12000 3 0 47T 6 4 30 0021 11 19 : 4 82000 3 0 8008 30 0 11 20 : 4 71600 1 0 8007 30 0 11 21 :8005 5 2 0 4 00 11 22 : 5 41872 2 0 81 8 7 7 30 00 11 23 :8007 7 2 0 4 00 11 24 7 41600 2 0 44 8 5 30 00 11 25 1 6 100 21 26 1 4 01848 74 0 21 27 :8002 2 100 21 28 : 2 1 851493 0 0 21 29 :8003 3 100 21 30 : 3 1 0 316 383 0 21 31 : 4 8 100 21 32 : 4 7 100 21 33 :8005 5 100 21 34 : 5 4 62 46 0 0 21 35 :8007 7 100 21 36 7 4 0 0 68 0 21 37 1 0 2 3 36 5 33 6 35 38 2 8002 35 39 3 8003 35 40 4 5 1 7 35 41 5 8005 35 42 6 1 35 43 7 8007 4 35 44 8 4 35 45 1 29 20 12 02 0 36 46 2 1 36 47 3 1 36 48 4 515 36 49 5 1 36 50 6 1 36 OSEQ.# :----+----1----+----2----+----3----+----4----+----5----+----6----+----7----+----8 1 CARD FILE LIST (CONT.) OSEQ.#:----+----1----+----2----+----3----+----4----+----5----+----6----+----7----+----8 51 7 11 36 52 8 1 36 53 :8002 21578 2 0 50 54 :8003 3 699 2 0 50 55 :8005 5 108 2 0 50 56 :8007 7 68 2 0 50 57 :2000 1 4 46 51 58 0 170 59 : 1 15338 12840 Subfi£ a public 195 60 2 18362 12840 195 61 3 16522 15224 %E cc '�� 195 62 4 13546 12824 i p �� ��17 195 fie` 63 5 13546 10952 C � __ 195 64 6 15338 10920 S �<�9� 195 65 7 13530 14424 _Y tl irk 195 66 8 11114 12824 195 67 1 210 OSEQ.# :----+----1----+----2----+----3----+----4----+----5----+----6----+----7----+----8 TRAF SIMULATION MODEL DEVELOPED FOR U. S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION y 03- 811 1 FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION FHWA OFFICE OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND TECHNOLOGY 0 Synchro File: J:\3241\NeoFutureWith.sy6, Date:Feb 20, 2003 0 DATE = 02/20/ 03 0 USER = 0 AGENCY = RUN CONTROL DATA SIMULATION 7981 RANDOM NUMBER SEED TO GENERATE EMISSION HEADWAYS FOR NETSIM SIMULATION 900 DURATION (SEC) OF TIME PERIOD NO. 1 0 60 LENGTH OF A TIME INTERVAL, SECONDS 0 5 MAXIMUM INITIALIZATION TIME, NUMBER OF TIME INTERVALS 0 0 NUMBER OF TIME INTERVALS BETWEEN SUCCESSIVE STANDARD OUTPUTS 0 0 TIME INTERMEDIATE OUTPUT WILL BEGIN AT INTERVALS OF 0 SECS. FOR 0 SECS. FOR MICROSCOPIC MODELS 0 1 NETSIM MOVEMENT -SPECIFIC OUTPUT CODE _ (0,1) (IF NOT, IF) REQUESTED FOR NETSIM SUBNETWORK 0 0 NETSIM GRAPHICS OUTPUT CODE _ (0,1) IF GRAPHICS OUTPUT (IS NOT, IS) REQUESTED 1*w,v,r***,ter**,t***t******�*********+r***w****�w,t,t*,t*,t**,t***,r,t,t*,t**,r*,r****,►**,r**,r**w**+r****,r*w*,r*,r,r****w TIME PERIOD 1 - NETSIM DATA Subs e , il'bed �r,,to the public 3. NETSIM LINKS City Gler =`� 0 -LANES- -CHANNEL- F C U U LOST Q DIS FREE LANE LENGTH L PKT GRD LINK R DESTINATION NODE OPP. TIME HDWY. SPEED 03- 811 VALUE RUN PARAMETERS AND OPTIONS 0 0 RUN IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 0 1 RUN TYPE CODE _ ( 1, 2, 3) TO RUN (SIMULATION, ASSIGNMENT, BOTH) (-1,-2,-3) TO CHECK (SIMULATION, ASSIGNMENT, BOTH) ONLY 0 NETSIM ENVIRONMENTAL OPTIONS 0 ---------------------------- FUEL/EMISSION RATE TABLES ARE NOT PRINTED 1 SIMULATION: PERFORMED ENVIRONMENTAL MEASURES: CALCULATED RATE TABLES: EMBEDDED TRAJECTORY FILE: WRITTEN 0 0 CODE _ (0,1,2) FOR UNIFORM DISTRIBUTION, NORMAL DISTRIBUTION, ERLANG DISTRIBUTION 0 0 INPUT UNITS CODE _ (0,1) IF INPUT IS IN (ENGLISH, METRIC) UNITS 0 OUTPUT UNITS CODE _ (0,1,2,3) IF OUTPUT IS IN (SAME AS INPUT, ENGLISH, METRIC, BOTH) UNITS 0 1200 CLOCK TIME AT START OF SIMULATION (HHMM) 0 0 SIGNAL TRANSITION CODE _ (0,1,2,3) IF(NO, IMMEDIATE, 2 -CYCLE, 3 - CYCLE) TRANSITION WAS REQUESTED 0 7581 RANDOM NUMBER SEED 7781 RANDOM NUMBER SEED TO GENERATE TRAFFIC STREAM FOR NETSIM OR LEVEL I SIMULATION 7981 RANDOM NUMBER SEED TO GENERATE EMISSION HEADWAYS FOR NETSIM SIMULATION 900 DURATION (SEC) OF TIME PERIOD NO. 1 0 60 LENGTH OF A TIME INTERVAL, SECONDS 0 5 MAXIMUM INITIALIZATION TIME, NUMBER OF TIME INTERVALS 0 0 NUMBER OF TIME INTERVALS BETWEEN SUCCESSIVE STANDARD OUTPUTS 0 0 TIME INTERMEDIATE OUTPUT WILL BEGIN AT INTERVALS OF 0 SECS. FOR 0 SECS. FOR MICROSCOPIC MODELS 0 1 NETSIM MOVEMENT -SPECIFIC OUTPUT CODE _ (0,1) (IF NOT, IF) REQUESTED FOR NETSIM SUBNETWORK 0 0 NETSIM GRAPHICS OUTPUT CODE _ (0,1) IF GRAPHICS OUTPUT (IS NOT, IS) REQUESTED 1*w,v,r***,ter**,t***t******�*********+r***w****�w,t,t*,t*,t**,t***,r,t,t*,t**,r*,r****,►**,r**,r**w**+r****,r*w*,r*,r,r****w TIME PERIOD 1 - NETSIM DATA Subs e , il'bed �r,,to the public 3. NETSIM LINKS City Gler =`� 0 -LANES- -CHANNEL- F C U U LOST Q DIS FREE LANE LENGTH L PKT GRD LINK R DESTINATION NODE OPP. TIME HDWY. SPEED 03- 811 RTOR PED ALIGN STREET LINK FT / M L L R PCT TYPE B234567 LEFT THRU RGHT DIAG NODE SEC SEC MPH/KMPH CODE CODE -MENT NAME ( 1, 6) 1920/ 585 2 0 0 0 1* 0000000 0 8006 0 0 0 2.0* 1.8* 30/ 48 0 0 1-1* SW lot Ave ( 1, 4) 180/ 55 3 0 0 0 1* 7TT0000 0 8 7 0 0 2.0* 1.8* 30/ 48 0 0 1-1* SW 7th Stree (8002, 2) 0/ 0 3 0 0 0 1* 0000000 0 1 0 0 0 2.0* 1.8* 0/ 0 0 0 1-1* ( 2, 1) 2000/ 610 3 0 0 0 1* TT80000 6 4 0 0 0 2.0* 1.8* 30/ 48 0 0 1-1* SW 7th Stree (8003, 3) 0/ 0 3 0 0 0 1* 0000000 0 1 0 0 0 2.0* 1.8* 0/ 0 0 0 1-1* ( 3, 1) 2000/ 610 3 0 0 0 1* 47T0000 0 6 4 0 0 2.0* 1.8* 30/ 48 0 0 2-1 SW1st Ave ( 4, 8) 2000/ 610 3 0 0 0 1* 0000000 0 8008 0 0 0 2.0* 1.8* 30/ 48 0 0 1-1* SW 7th Stree ( 41 7) 1600/ 488 1 0 0 0 1*' 0000000 0 8007 0 0 0 2.0* 1.8* 30/ 48 0 0 1-1* (8005, 5) 0/ 0 2 0 0 0 1* 0000000 0 4 0 0 0 2.0* 1.8* 0/ 0 0 0 1-1* ( 5, 4) 1872/ 571 2 0 0 0 1* 8100000 8 7 0 0 7 2.0* 1.8* 30/ 48 0 0 1-1* SW 1st Ct (8007, 7) 0/ 0 2 0 0 0 1* 0000000 0 4 0 0 0 2.0* 1.8* 0/ 0 0 0 1-1* ( 7, 4) 1600/ 488 2 0 0 0 1* 4400000 0 0 8 0 5 2.0* 1.8* 30/ 48 0 0 1-1* LINK TYPE PEDESTRIAN CODES IDENTIFIES THE NO PEDESTRIANS DISTRIBUTION USED FOR LIGHT QUEUE DISCHARGE AND MODERATE START-UP LOST TIME HEAVY * INDICATES DEFAULT VALUES WERE SPECIFIED LANE CHANNELIZATION CODES 0 UNRESTRICTED 1 LEFT TURNS ONLY 2 BUSES ONLY 3 CLOSED RTOR CODES 0 RTOR PERMITTED 0 1 RTOR PROHIBITED 1 Y 2 CHARACTERISTICS. 4 RIGHT TURNS ONLY a 5 CAR - POOLS 3 6 CAR - POOLS + BUSES 7 RIGHT TURNS + RIGHT DIAGONAL AND/OR THROUGH 8 LEFT TURNS + LEFT DIAGONAL AND/OR THROUGH j 9 ALL PERMITTED MOVEMENTS WITH RESPECT TO THE GEOMETRY AND ADJACENT LANE CHANNELIZATIONS D DIAGONAL TRAFFIC ONLY T THROUGH TRAFFIC ONLY TOTAL LINKS: 12 (ALLOWED: 1000) TOTAL NON -ENTRY NODES: 8 (ALLOWED: 500) ***** WARNING - 500 - Link (7,4) may not have been specified correctly on Record Type 11. Its traffic opposes traffic on link (5,4), but no receiving link (4,5) was input. Check Record Type 11. 1 NETSIM TURNING MOVEMENT DATA 1 - TURN MOVEMENT PERCENTAGES TURN MOVEMENT POSSIBLE POCKET LENGTH (IN FEET/METERS) LINK LEFT THROUGH RIGHT DIAGONAL LEFT T QUGH RIpGH IAGONAL LEFT RIGHT � J " t i. ( 11 6) 0 100 0 0 NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 11 4) 0 96 4 0 NO YES YES NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 (8002, 2) 0 100 0 0 NO YES NO NO O/ 0 0/ 0 ( 2, 1) 5 95 0 0 YES YES NO NO O/ 0 0/ 0 (8003, 3) 0 100 0 0 NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 3, 1) 0 45 55 0 NO YES YES NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 4, 8) 0 100 0 0 NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 O/ 0 ( 4, 7) 0 100 0 0 NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 O/ 0 (8005, 5) 0 100 0 0 NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 O/ 0 ( 5, 4) 57 43 0 0 YES YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 (8007, 7) 0 100 0 0 NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 7, 4) 0 0 100 0 NO NO YES NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 1 SPECIFIED FIXED -TIME SIGNAL CONTROL, AND SIGN CONTROL, CODES 0 NODE 1 OFFSET 0 SEC CYCLE LENGTH 80 0 SEC INTERVAL DURATION - `RfiX n public- +- - - - - - - - - - - - - - NUMBER (SEC) (PCT) ( 2, 1) ( 3, 1) o 1 36 45 2 9 2 5 6 2 0ygg 1 r�J�.�+iA f�lc �1 b�e1 i34 3 33 41 1 2 City Clerk 4 6 7 0 2 0 NODE 2 IS UNDER SIGN CONTROL 0 INTERVAL DURATION +- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - APPROACHES - - - - - - - - NUMBER (SEC) (PCT) (8002, 2) 1 0 100 1 0 NODE 3 IS UNDER SIGN CONTROL 0 INTERVAL DURATION +- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - APPROACHES - - - - - - - - NUMBER (SEC) (PCT) (8003, 3) 1 0 100 1 0 NODE 4 IS UNDER SIGN CONTROL 0 INTERVAL DURATION +- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - APPROACHES - - - - - - - - NUMBER (SEC) (PCT) ( 5, 4) ( 1, 4) ( 7, 4) 1 0 100 5 1 5 0 NODE 5 IS UNDER SIGN CONTROL 0 INTERVAL DURATION +- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - APPROACHES - - - - - - - - NUMBER (SEC) (PCT) (8005, 5) 1 0 100 1 0 NODE 6 IS UNDER SIGN CONTROL 0, INTERVAL DURATION +- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - APPROACHES - - - - - - - - NUMBER (SEC) (PCT) ( 1, 6) 1 0 100 1 0 NODE 7 IS UNDER SIGN CONTROL 0 INTERVAL DURATION +- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - APPROACHES - - - - - - - - NUMBER (SEC) (PCT) (8007, 7) ( 4, 7) 1 0 100 1 1 0 NODE 8 IS UNDER SIGN CONTROL 0 INTERVAL DURATION +- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - APPROACHES - - - - - - - - NUMBER (SEC) (PCT) 4, 8) 811 1 0 100 1 1 INTERPRETATION OF SIGNAL CODES 0 YIELD OR AMBER 1 GREEN 2 RED 3 RED WITH GREEN RIGHT ARROW 4 RED WITH GREEN LEFT ARROW 5 STOP 6 RED WITH GREEN DIAGONAL ARROW 7 NO TURNS -GREEN THRU ARROW 8 RED WITH LEFT AND RIGHT GREEN ARROW 9 NO LEFT TURN -GREEN THRU AND RIGHT 1 TRAFFIC CONTROL TABLE - SIGNS AND FIXED TIME SIGNALS CONTROL CODES GO = PROTECTED NOGO = NOT PERMITTED AMBR = AMBER PERM = PERMITTED NOT PROTECTED PROT = PROTECTED STOP = STOP SIGN YLD = YIELD SIGN NODE 1 FIXED TIME CONTROL OFFSET = 0 SECONDS CYCLE LENGTH = 80 SECONDS INTERVAL DURATION ------------------------------------------- APPROACHES -------------------------------------------- ( 2, 1) ( 3, 1) _ LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG 1 36 NOGO NOGO GO GO,� Submitta' d the public 2 5 NOGO NOGO AMBR AMBR 3 33 PROT GO NOGO NOGO 4 6 AMBR AMBR NOGO NOGG NODE 2 SIGN CONTROL INTERVAL DURATION ------------------------------------------- APPROACHES -------------------------------------------- (8002, 2) LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG 1 0 GO NODE 3 SIGN CONTROL INTERVAL DURATION ------------------------------------------- APPROACHES -------------------------------------------- (8003, 3) LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG 1 0 GO 03- Sit NODE 4 SIGN CONTROL INTERVAL DURATION ------------------------------------------- APPROACHES -------------------------------------------- 5, . 4) 1, 4) 7, 4) LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG 1 0 STOP STOP GO GO STOP NODE 5 SIGN CONTROL INTERVAL DURATION ------------------------------------------- APPROACHES -------------------------------------------- (8005, 5) LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG 1 0 GO 1 NODE 6 SIGN CONTROL INTERVAL DURATION ------------------------------------------- APPROACHES -------------------------------------------- 1, 6) LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG 1 0 GO NODE 7 SIGN CONTROL INTERVAL DURATION ------------------------------------------- APPROACHES -------------------------------------------- (8007, 7) 4, 7) LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG 1 0 GO GO J-2-11 NODE 8 SIGN CONTROL INTERVAL DURATION ------------------------------------------- APPROACHES -------------------------------------------- 4, 8) LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG LEFT THRU RITE DIAG 1 0 GO ENTRY LINK VOLUMES LINK FLOW RATE TRUCKS CAR POOLS HOV VIOLATORS (VEH/HOUR) (PERCENT) (PERCENT) (PERCENT) (8002, 2) 1578 2 0 1.00 (8003, 3) 699 2 0 1.00 (8005, 5) 108 2 0 1.00 (8007, 7) 68 2 0 1.00 NETSIM VEHICLE TYPE SPECIFICATIONS VEHICLE LENGTH Q DSCHG HDWY FLEET COMPONENT 3 8 1 PERCENTAGES PERF. TYPE FEET/METERS FACTOR (PCT) AVG. OCCUP. AUTO TRUCK CARPOOL BUS INDEX 1** 16.0/ 4.9 100 1.3 75 0 0 0 2 2** 35.0/ 10.7 120 1.2 0 100 0 0 3 3** 16.0/ 4.9 100 2.5 0 0 100 0 2 4** 40.0/ 12.2 120 25.0 0 0 0 100 7 5** 14.0/ 4.3 100 1.3 25 0 0 0 1 6** 53.0/ 16.2 120 1.2 0 0 0 0 4 7** 53.0/ 16.2 120 1.2 0 0 0 0 5 8** 64.0/ 19.5 120 1.2 0 0 0 0 6 9** 14.0/ 4.3 100 2.5 0 0 0 0 1 ** INDICATES THAT ALL PARAMETERS FOR VEHICLE TYPE ASSUME DEFAULT VALUES 1 DEFAULT LINK GEOMETRIC DATA WIDTH OF LANES 12 FEET LONGITUDINAL DISTANCE FROM THE STOP 4 FEET LINE TO THE NEAR CURB FORWARD SIGHT DISTANCE AT STOP LINE 1000 FEET l g_ s?lr 9 v!h LANE CHANGE DAT PARAMETERS VALUEv3� , UNITS city ENGLISH / METRIC DURATION OF LANE CHANGE MANEUVER 3* SECONDS MEAN DRIVER REACTION TIME 10* TENTHS OF A SECOND TIME REQUIRED FOR SUCCESSIVE LANE CHANGES 20* TENTHS OF A SECOND DECELERATION AT BEGINNING OF LANE CHANGE MANEUVER 5* f 2 FEET [METERS] / SECOND**2 DIFFERENCE IN VEHICLE'S DECELERATION OVER THE DISTANCE BETWEEN ITS POSITION WHEN IT BEGINS TO RESPOND TO AN OBSTRUCTION AND THE POSITION OF THE OBSTRUCTION - FOR MANDATORY LANE CHANGE: 10* / 3 FEET [METERS] / SECOND**2 FOR DISCRETIONARY LANE CHANGE: 5* / 2 FEET [METERSI / SECOND**2 PANIC DECELERATION RATE OF LEAD VEHICLE FOR COMPUTATION OF CAR -FOLLOWING LAW 12* / 4 FEET '[METERS] / SECOND**2 PANIC DECELERATION RATE OF FOLLOWER VEHICLE FOR COMPUTATION OF CAR -FOLLOWING LAW 12* / 4 FEET [METERS] / SECOND**2 811 DRIVER TYPE FACTOR USED TO COMPUTE DRIVER AGGRESSIVENESS URGENCY THRESHOLD SECONDS**2 / FEET [METERS] SAFETY FACTOR FOR COMPUTATION OF PERCEIVED RISK OF LANE CHANGE * 10 PERCENT OF DRIVERS WHO COOPERATE WITH A LANE CHANGER HEADWAY BELOW WHICH ALL DRIVERS WILL ATTEMPT TO CHANGE LANES OF A SECOND HEADWAY ABOVE WHICH NO DRIVERS WILL ATTEMPT TO CHANGE LANES OF A SECOND FORWARD DISTANCE SCANNED BY DRIVER FOR A TURN MOVEMENT / BUS STATION IN ORDER TO ASSESS NEED FOR A LANE CHANGE [METERS] 25* 2* / 1 10 8* FACTOR 50* $ 20*, :. TENTHS ' rE i TENTHS City Clerk 300* / 91 FEET / * INDICATES DEFAULT VALUES WERE SPECIFIED MAXIMUM ACCELERATION -------------------------- TABLE PERFORMANCE 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 INDEX FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC ----- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 1 8.00 9.00 6.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2 6.00 12.00 10.00 8.00 7.00 6.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 3 4.69 5.35 4.94 3.47 3.09 2.61 2.14 1.70 1.27 .86 .46 .06 4 2.81 2.42 2.15 2.04 1.74 1.42 1.12 .83 .56 .30 .04 -.23 5 2.76 2.37 1.81 1.56 1.25 .97 .73 .52 .32 .14 -.05 - .23 6 2.45 2.14 1.42 1.12 .85 .63 .44 .29 .14 ,00 -.14 -.27 7 7.47 5.33 3.17 2.66 2.29 1.65 1.40 .95 .75 .50 -.33 -.35 GRADE CORRECTION FACTORS FOR ACCELERATION (USED BY FRESIM ONLY) --------------------------------------------------------------- PERFORMANCE 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 INDEX FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SSC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC ----- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 1 .31 .31 .31 .31 .31 .31 .31 .31 .31 .31 .31 .31 2 .31 .31 .31 .31 .31 .31 .31 .31 .31 .31 .31 .31 3 .21 .21 .21 .22 .23 .25 .26 .27 .28 .28 .30 .31 4 .16 .15 .19 .22 .24 .25 .27 .28 .29 .31 .31 .31 5 .18 .17 .20 .23 .25 .27 .28 .30 .31 .31 .31 .31 6 .18 .18 .22 .25 .27 .29 .30 .30 .31 .31 .31 .31 7 .27 .27 .27 .27 .27 .29 .29 .30 .30 .30 .30 .30 GRADE CORRECTION FACTORS FOR FUEL CONSUMPTION (USED BY FRESIM ONLY) PERFORMANCE 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 INDEX FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC ----- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ . 1 .31 31 .31 .31 .31 .31 .31 .31 .31 .31 .31 .31 2 .31 .31 .31 .31 .31 .31 .31 .31 .31 .31 .31 .31 3 .26 .26 .26 .28 .29 .30 .30 .30 .30 .30 .30 .30 4 .11 .11 .23 .27 .28 .29 .30 .30 .30 .30 .30 .30 5 .16 .16 .26 .28 .29 .30 .30 .30 .30 .30 .30 .30 6 .20 .20 .28 .29 .30 .30 .30 .30 .31 .31 .31 .31 7 .27 .27 .27 .27 .27 .29 .29 .30 .30 .30 .30 .30 ***** WARNING - 400 - An inconsistency exists between the length of link (4,8) input on Record Type 11 or Record Type 19 and the length of this link computed from node coordinate data input for nodes 4 and 8 on Record Type 195. The length input was 2000, and the length computed from node coordinate data is 2432. ***** WARNING - 400 - An inconsistency exists between the length of link (1,4) input on Record Type 11 or Record Type 19 and the length of this link computed from node coordinate data input for nodes 1 and 4 on Record Type 195. The length input was 180, and the length computed from node coordinate data is 1792. ***** WARNING - 400 - An inconsistency exists between the length of link (3,1) input on Record Type it or Record Type 19 and the length of this link computed from node coordinate data input for nodes 3 and 1 on Record Type 195. The length input was 2000, and the length computed from node coordinate data is 2661. ***** WARNING - 400 - An inconsistency exists between the length of link (2,1) input on Record Type 11 or Record Type 19 and the length of this link computed from node coordinate data input for nodes 2 and 1 on Record Type 195. The length input was 2000, and the length computed from node coordinate data is 3024. **** THERE WERE 5 WARNING MESSAGES IN DATA. 1 re, `..� SOURCE/SINK FLOW RATES it BEGIN TIME FLOW RATE CENTROID LINK (MINUTES) (VEH/HOUR) (2000) ( 11 4) 0 46 (2000) ( 1, 4) 15 46 1 INITIALIZATION STATISTICS TIME INTERVAL SUBNETWORK PRIOR CONTENT CURRENT CONTENT PERCENT NUMBER TYPE (VEHICLES) (VEHICLES) DIFFERENCE �3-� 8ii I NETSIM 0 iter t--..�• 38 - '--- 10000 2 NETSIM 39 �D( 3 .s.,;6b • ,. 69 3 NETSIM 66 86 ,rr^ 32iK 30 4 NETSIM 86 81 5 EQUILIBRIUM ATTAINED ALL EXISTING SUBNETWORKS REACHED EQUILIBRIUM 1 CUMULATIVE NETSIM STATISTICS AT TIME 12:15: 0 ELAPSED TIME IS 0:15: 0 ( 900 SECONDS), TIME PERIOD 1 ELAPSED TIME IS 900 SECONDS VEHICLE MINUTES RATIO MINUTES/MILS -------- SECONDS % VEHICLE --------- - AVERAGE VALUES - VEHICLE MOVE DELAY TOTAL MOVE/ TOTAL DELAY TOTAL DELAY CONTROL QUEUE STOP* STOPS VOL SPEED LINK MILES TRIPS TIME TIME TIME TOTAL TIME TIME TIME TIME DELAY DELAY ---- TIME (%) VPH MPH ----------- -------------------- ----- ------------- ------------------------------------- ( 1, 6) 38.91 ------------------- 107 77.8 8.8 86.6 .90 2.23 .23 47.4 4.9 .0 .0 .0 0 428 27.0 ( 11 4) 15.67 465 31.3 11.3 42.7 .73 2.72 .72 5.5 1.5 .2 .2 .1 1 1860 22.0 (8002, 2) 394 1576 ( 2, 1) 145.83 385 291.7 121.9 413.6 .71 2.84 .84 62.3 18.0 15.7 13.4 12.7 60 1540 21.2 (8003, 3) 173 692 ( 3, 1) 68.18 180 136.4 39.2 175.5 .78 2.57 .57 57.0 12.5 9.7 8.5 8.2 53 720 23.3 ( 4, 8) 181.37 479 362.7 42.8 405.5 .89 2.24 .24 49.5 5.5 .0 .0 .0 0 1916 26.8 ( 4, 7) 6.94 23 13.9 .3 14.2 .98 2.04 .04 36.2 .8 .0 .1 .0 0 92 - 29.4 (8005, 5) 26 104 ( 51 4) 9.93 28 19.9 5.8 25.7 .77 2.59 .59 53.2 12.1 8.7 8.0 7.9 100 112 23.2 (8007, 7) 17 68 ( 7, 4) 4.85 16 9.7 3.4 13.1 .74 2.70 .70 45.3 11.3 7.4 7.1 6.8 100 64 22.2 OSUBNETWORK= 471.68 609 15.72 3.89 19.62 .80 2.50 .50 1.75 .35 .21 .18 .17 62.2 24.0 -- VEHICLE - HOURS -- --- MINUTES / VEHICLE - TRIP --- PER TRIP 1 CUMULATIVE NETSIM STATISTICS AT TIME 12:15: 0 ELAPSED TIME IS 0:15: 0 ( 900 SECONDS), TIME PERIOD 1 ELAPSED TIME IS 900 SECONDS VEH-MINS * AVERAGE -- CONGESTION -- ------------ Q U E U E L E N G T H (VEHICLE) ------------ NUMBER QUEUE STOP OCCUPANCY STORAGE PHASE AVERAGE QUEUE BY LANE ** MAXIMUM QUEUE BY LANE OF LANE LINK TIME TIME (VEHICLE) M FAILURE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 CHANGES ( 1, 6) .1 .0 6.2 3.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 03- 811 ( 1, 4) 1.3 .7 3.3 12.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 16 LANE 4 LANE 5 LANE 6 LANE 7 ( 2, 1) 92.6 87.6 28.4 9.5 0 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 8 8 7 0 0 0 0 150 --- --- --- --- ( 11 6) 45 180 62 ( 3, 1) 26.7 25.7 11.7 3.9 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 4 3 3 0 0 0 0 43 812 155 620 112 448 0 0 0 0 0 0 ( 4, 8) .2 .0 28.1 9.4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 174 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ( 4, 7) 1 .0 1.4 1.7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ( 4, 8) ( 5, 4) 3.9 3.8 2.0 1.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ( 4, 7) 23 92 0 0 0 ( 7, 4) 2.1 2.0 1.6 1.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 Submstfnd Into then blk-, 0 0 0 OSUBNETWORK= 126.9 119.9 82.7 5.3 0 p! ( 7, 4) 14 406 2 8 0 0 * THESE VALUES INCLUDE THE TIME FOR VEHICLES CURRENTLY ON THE LINK. ** AVERAGE QUEUE CALCULATED BASED ON TIME SINCE BEGINNING OF SIMULATION City U�e!k 1 1 CUMULATIVE NETSIM STATISTICS AT TIME 12:15: 0 ELAPSED TIME IS 0:15: 0 ( 900 SECONDS), TIME PERIOD 1 ELAPSED TIME IS 900 SECONDS DISCHARGE BY LANE LANE 1 LANE 2 LANE 3 LANE 4 LANE 5 LANE 6 LANE 7 LINK VEH VPH VEH VPH VEH VPH VEH VPH VEH VPH VEH VPH ---- VEH VPH --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ( 11 6) 45 180 62 248 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ( 11 4) 203 812 155 620 112 448 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ( 2, 1) 130 520 129 516 126 504 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ( 3, 1) 70 280 53 212 57 228 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ( 4, 8) 176 704 173 692 130 520 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ( 4, 7) 23 92 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ( 5, 4) 28 112 0 0 0 0 Submstfnd Into then blk-, 0 0 0 0 p! ( 7, 4) 14 56 2 8 0 0 City U�e!k 1 NETSIM PERSON MEASURES OF EFFECTIVENESS LINK PERSON PERSON DELAY TRAVEL TIME MILE TRIPS PERSON -MIN -PERSON-MIN ( 1, 6) 50.6 139.1 11.4 112.6 ( 1, 4) 20.3 603.3 �4.7 � J r � � a 55.4 ( 2, 1) 189.3 499.7 158.3 536.8 ( 3, 1) 88.5 233.6 50.8 227.8 ( 4, 8) 235.4 621.6 55.5 526.3 ( 4, 7) 9.0 29.8 .4 18.4 ( 5, 4) 12.9 36.4 7.6 33.4 ( 7, 4) 6.3 20.8 4.4 17.0 1 *** NOTE *** TIME PERIOD 1 SPECIFIC NETSIM STATISTICS ARE y� TJX �4 "l AT THE END OF TIME PERIOD 1.��{"` itei ?B 1 NETSIM MOVEMENT SPECIFIC STATISTICSi► 0 LINK VEHICLE-MILE VEHICLE-TRIPS SPEED (MPH ) STOPS (PCT) LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT ( 11 6) .00 38.91 .00 0 107 0 .0 27.0 .0 .0 .0 .0 ( 11 4) .00 15.20 .47 0 451 14 .0 22.2 18.1 .0 1.1 7.1 (8002, 2) 0 394 0 ( 2, 1) 5.30 140.53 .00 14 371 0 20.6 21.2 .0 64.3 60.4 .0 (8003, 3) 0 173 0 ( 3, 1) .00 34.85 33.33 0 92 88 .0 22.6 24.1 .0 46.7 60.2 ( 4, 8) .00 181.37 .00 0 479 0 .0 26.8 .0 .0 .0 .0 ( 4, 7) .00 6.94 .00 0 23 0 .0 29.4 .0 .0 .0 .0 (8005, 5) 0 26 0 t 51 4) 6.38 3.55 .00 18 10 0 22.3 24.9 .0 100.0 100.0 .0 (8007, 7) 0 17 0 ( 7, 4) .00 .00 4.85 0 0 16 .0 .0 22.2 .0 .0 100.0 1 NETSIM MOVEMENT SPECIFIC STATISTICS - TABLE II LINK MOVING TIME DELAY TIME TOTAL TIME RATIO MOVE/TOTAL (VER-MINS) (VER-MINS) (VEH-MINS) (VEH-MINS) LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT ( 11 6) .00 77.82 .00 .00 8.80 .00 .00 86.62 .00 .00 .90 .00 ( 1, 4) .00 30.75 .95 .00 10.37 .61 .00 41.12 1.57 -.00 .75 .61 (8002, 2) ( 2, 1) 10.61 281.06 .00 4.86 117.09 .00 15.47 398.15 .00 .69 .71 .00 (8003, 3) c� 44 1 .00 ( 3, 1) .00 .00 69.70 66.67 .00 .75 4.40 .80 .00 .00 .00 3.39 ( 4, 8) .00 362.88 .00 .00 .89 .00 (SECS/VEH) (SECS/VEH) } ( 4, 7) (VEH-MINS) .00 13.94 .00 .00 .98 .00 (8005, 5) THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT ( 5, 4) RIGHT 12.76 7.09 .00 .74 .83 .00 ( 11 (8007, 7) 48.6 .0 .0 4.9 .0 ( 7, 4) .0 .00 .00 9.70 .00 .00 .74 1 .00 22.89 16.27 .00 42.65 .00 .00 .24 .00 4.40 1.44 .00 .00 .00 3.39 .00 92.58 82.93 .00 405.53 .00 .00 14.18 .00 17.17 8.53 .00. .00 .00 13.08 NETSIM MOVEMENT SPECIFIC STATISTICS - TABLE III LINK TOTAL TIME DELAY TIME QUEUE TIME** STOP TIME** (SECS/VEH) (SECS/VEH) (VEH-MINS) (VEH-MINS) LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT ( 11 6) .0 48.6 .0 .0 4.9 .0 .0 .1 .0 .0 .0 .0 ( 1, 4) .0 5.5 6.7 .0 1.4 2.6 .0 1.0 .3 .0 .5 .2 (8002, 2) ( 2, 1) 66.3 64.4 .0 20.8 18.9 .0 3.4 89.3 .0 3.2 84.4 .0 (8003, 3) ( 3, 1) .0 60.4 56.5 .0 14.9 11.1 .0 15.2 11.5 .0 14.6 11.1 ( 4, 8) .0 50.8 .0 .0 5.3 .0 .0 .2 .0 .0 .0 .0 ( 4, 7) .0 37.0 .0 .0 .6 .0 .0 .1 .0 .0 .0 .0 (8005, 5) ( 5, 4) 57.2 51.2 .0 14.7 8.7 .0 2.7 1.2 .0 2.7 1.1 .0 (8007, 7) ( 7, 4) .0 .0 49.1 .0 .0 12.7 .0 .0 2.1 .0 .0 2.0 ** TIME FOR VEHICyL1ES CURRENTLY ON THE LINK ARE INCLUDED IN THESE VALUES. ru D11 NETSIM CUMULATIVE VALUES OF FUEL CONSUMPTION LINK FUEL CONSUMPTION GALLONS M.P.G. VEHICLE TYPE- 5 1 2 6 7 8 4 5 1 2 6 7 8 4 1 1, 6) .58 1.01 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 17.70 27.72 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 4, 8) 2.84 4.21 1.02 .00 .00 .00 .00 18.63 30.76 4.07 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 4, 7) .18 .19 .11 .00 .00 .00 .00 12.58 23.71 2.77 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 5, 4) .20 .19 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 19.68 28.32 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 1, 4) .71 1.13 .28 .00 .00 .00 .00 5.77 9.36 1.34 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 3, 1) .97 1.67 .28 .00 .00 .00 .00 18.02 27.64 5.26 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 2, 1) 2.43 4.40 .65 .00 .00 .00 .00 16.21 23.90 4.59 .00 .00 .00 .00 tt ( 7, 4) .10 .12 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 18.55 27.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 SUBNETWORK- 8.02 12.93 2.34 .00 .00 .00 .00 16.49 25.73 3.97 .00 .00 .00 .00 VEHICLE TYPES 1, 5 - AUTO, VEHICLE TYPES 2, 6, 7, 8 - TRUCK, VEHICLE TYPE 4 a BUS 1 NETSIM CUMULATIVE VALUES OF EMISSION LINK VEHICLE EMISSIONS (GRAMS/ MILE) HC VEHICLE TYPE- 5 1 2 6 7 8 4 ( 1, 6) .05 .07 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 4, 8) .05 .04 7.29 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 4, 7) .14 .14 11.49 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 5, 4) .04 .05 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 1, 4) .44 .61 24.39 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 3, 1) .05 .06 5.39 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 2, 1) .07 .08 6.28 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 7, 4) .06 .06 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 SUBNETWORK- .07 .08 7.48 .00 .00 .00 .00 VEHICLE TYPES 1, 5 a AUTO, VEHICLE TYPES 2, 6, 7, 8 = TRUCK, VEHICLE TYPE 4 TRANSIT BUS ;3(, bmifted g Into F`,"- pubo 1 d in conn d" NETSIM CUMULATIVE VALUES OF EMIS°3 LINK VEHICLE EMISSIONS (GRAMS/ MILE)r`sc(lIa CO VEHICLE TYPE- 5 1 2 6 7 8 4 ( 1, 6) 4.37 6.37 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 4, 8) 4.10 4.23 112.05 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 4, 7) 9.38 11.81 191.14 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 51 4) 4.07 4.80 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 11 4) 25.33 44.95 414.01 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 3, 1) 4.86 5.46 78.33 .00 .00 .00 .00 -. ( 2, 1) 5.78 7.17 92.66 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 7, 4) 5.89 5.87 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 SUBNETWORK- 5.50 6.94 115.10 .00 .00 .00 .00 VEHICLE TYPES 1, 5 a AUTO, VEHICLE TYPES 2, 6, 7, 8 = TRUCK, VEHICLE TYPE 4 a TRANSIT BUS 1 NETSIM CUMULATIVE VALUES OF EMISSION LINK VEHICLE EMISSIONS (GRAMS/ MILE) NO VEHICLE TYPE- 5 1 2 6 3 �a - 7641 8 4 7J J THE HIGHEST NUMBER OF VEHICLES ON THE NETWORK WAS 100 VEHICLES (MAXIMUM ALLOWED IS 20000). THIS MAXIMUM OCCURRED AT 752 SECONDS. THE FRACTION OF VEHICLES THAT WERE UNABLE TO COMPLETE THEIR ASSIGNED TURN MOVEMENT WAS .00128 ------------------------------- NETWORK-WIDE AVERAGE STATISTICS ------------------------------- TOTAL VEHICLE- MILE = 471.68 VEHICLE -HOURS OF: MOVE TIME = 15.72 , DELAY TIME _ 3.89 , TOTAL TIME = 19.62 AVERAGE SPEED ( MPH)= 24.05 MOVE/TOTAL = .80 .50 , TOTAL TIME = 2.50 NETWORK -WIDE STATISTICS FOR SCRIPT PROCESSING 471.68, 15.72, 3.89, 19.62, 24.05, .80, TOTAL CPU TIME FOR SIMULATION a 1.82 SECONDS TOTAL CPU TIME FOR THIS RUN = 1.82 SECONDS 0***** THERE WERE 5 WARNING MESSAGES. OLAST CASE PROCESSED MINUTES/MILE OF: DELAY TIME _ 50, 2.50 tw/ o t"le POM'_ r d c lei r 'n. city Cierk ��3`` 81t ( 11 6) .29 .26 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 4, 8) .24 .17 15.98 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 4, 7) .75 .47 28.90 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 5, 4) .17 .13 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 11 4) 2.45 2.15 65.50 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 3, 1) .23 .20 11.16 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 2, 1) .32 .30 12.65 .00 .00 .00 .00 ( 7, 4) .19 .20 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 SUBNETWORK- .34 .29 16.55 .00 .00 .00 .00 VEHICLE TYPES 1,'5 = AUTO, VEHICLE TYPES 2, 6, 7, 8 - TRUCK, VEHICLE TYPE 4 = TRANSIT BUS THE HIGHEST NUMBER OF VEHICLES ON THE NETWORK WAS 100 VEHICLES (MAXIMUM ALLOWED IS 20000). THIS MAXIMUM OCCURRED AT 752 SECONDS. THE FRACTION OF VEHICLES THAT WERE UNABLE TO COMPLETE THEIR ASSIGNED TURN MOVEMENT WAS .00128 ------------------------------- NETWORK-WIDE AVERAGE STATISTICS ------------------------------- TOTAL VEHICLE- MILE = 471.68 VEHICLE -HOURS OF: MOVE TIME = 15.72 , DELAY TIME _ 3.89 , TOTAL TIME = 19.62 AVERAGE SPEED ( MPH)= 24.05 MOVE/TOTAL = .80 .50 , TOTAL TIME = 2.50 NETWORK -WIDE STATISTICS FOR SCRIPT PROCESSING 471.68, 15.72, 3.89, 19.62, 24.05, .80, TOTAL CPU TIME FOR SIMULATION a 1.82 SECONDS TOTAL CPU TIME FOR THIS RUN = 1.82 SECONDS 0***** THERE WERE 5 WARNING MESSAGES. OLAST CASE PROCESSED MINUTES/MILE OF: DELAY TIME _ 50, 2.50 tw/ o t"le POM'_ r d c lei r 'n. city Cierk ��3`` 81t a �" oaomoon n HOo..M..M Since 1989 CIVIL LAND DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION NEO VERTIKA AT SW 7T" STREET and SW IST AVENUE SITE UTILITY STUDY March 2003 StaAb�S,d4y?i±: info thet public •re1JDa'b! .: ?e. �i,i i.J 2 If f item Prisciiia A.Thompson City Clerk 8550 W. FLAGLER STREET, SUITE 113, MIAMI, FLORIDA 33144 TF! . tAnFF F5?=F3?F7 e FA -Y. !Zn41 SSi-4r-47 — 811 0000MOMMUMM General........................................................................... 2 2. Storm Drainage System ...................................................... 3 3. Water Distribution System ................................................... 5 4. Sewer Collection System .................................................... 6 5. Solid Waste Generation..................................................... 8 amammoson Since 1959 CIVIL LAND DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1. General........................................................................... 2 2. Storm Drainage System ...................................................... 3 3. Water Distribution System ................................................... 5 4. Sewer Collection System .................................................... 6 5. Solid Waste Generation..................................................... 8 EXHIBITS: „A" Location Map .......................................................... 10 "B" Storm Drainage Well Calculations .............................. 12 MD-WASD Water Atlas ........... ..... 15 ......................... . MD-WASD Sewer Atlas ............................................ 16 Proposed Water Use Calculations .............................. 17 DERM Pump Station 30-0001 Monthly Report ............. 18 MD-WASD Letter of Availability ............ "D" Solid Waste Generation Calculations ........................... 22 Q,> itemz-.1__._..__f -»�o City Clerk 0 3 � 8 .1. 1 1. General MOSCOW o alo■■■■■ Since 1989 CIVIL LAND DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION NEO VERTIKA SITE UTILITY STUDY A. Project Location and size: The proposed project is a Mixed Use Facility consisting of condominium residential units and retail commercial space to be constructed at an approximately 2.22 acre site located at the northwest corner of SW 7th Street and SW 1St Avenue, in Section 1, Township 54 South, Range 41 East, Miami - Dade County, Florida. There are three existing buildings on this site that will be demolished to allow for the constructions of this project. B. The proposed project build -out will be as follows: Residential Units 443 (Apartments) Retail Commercial 18,969 SF city �.olv�IA 03- 81, . �, . -„ vooaoo. un 1, _ _ ONE Since 1989 2. Storm Drainage System A. Existing Storm Drainage System: CIVIL LAND DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION Roadway storm drainage systems presently exist along the streets surrounding the proposed project. These systems are owned and maintained by the City of Miami. The site, in its existing or proposed conditions, does not or will not contribute any significant amount of storm water run-off into the Public Roadway System. No significant improvements to the existing Roadway Drainage System are expected as a result of this project other than some possible inlet modifications associated with the street of sidewalk improvements. B. Proposed On -Site Storm Drainage System: The proposed storm drainage system to serve this project will be designed to fully contain on-site the storm water run-off and to meet the Miami - Dade County Department of Environmental Resources Management (DERM) Environmental Resources Permit (ERP) requirements. This will be accomplished by providing on-site storage to meet the requirements. Deep storm water drainage wells will be installed to provide adequate drainage to the project. No off- site run-off will be generated from the site. The total contributing site area and 30% of the building wall area exposed to the rain will be included in the Disposal Well System design calculations. An impervious coefficient of 0.95 will be used for the purpose of this study. Based on information provided by an experienced well drilling company for other projects in the vicinity, an approximate well discharge rate between 600 to 750 gpm per foot of head can be expected. Storm water from roofs, internal driveways and parking areas will be conveyed by means of a collection system to sediment tanks sized to meet the detention volume requirements prior to discharging into the Well System. Pollution retardant mechanisms will be provided at the catch basins prior to entering the detention tanks. Subm ftec! 2n,t-i the public reccd�:-i ,3. ih :a, Ttgony' son a City Clerk 03— 811 Since Siete 1989 C. Required number of Wells: CIVIL LAND DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION Based on the attached calculations, four (4) storm drainage wells are required to provide full on-site retention for this project depending on the actual yields obtained during the well drilling operations. For Well Disposal System calculations refer to attached Exhibit "B". Submitted into the public ri item III 03 ,ytl'„ I f 031 — 811 I, MEN MEMO, Since Siete 1989 C. Required number of Wells: CIVIL LAND DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION Based on the attached calculations, four (4) storm drainage wells are required to provide full on-site retention for this project depending on the actual yields obtained during the well drilling operations. For Well Disposal System calculations refer to attached Exhibit "B". Submitted into the public ri item III 03 ,ytl'„ I f 031 — 811 OMEN lm HMO ■ ■ M ■■ Since 1989 3. Water Distribution System CIVIL LAND DEVELOPhENT TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION A. Existing Water System Facilities: (See exhibit "C") Miami -Dade Water & Sewer Department (MD-WASD) owns and operates the following domestic water facilities in the vicinity of this project.. • An existing 12 -inch water main on SW 7th Street that runs along the entire south side of the proposed project. • An existing 8 -inch water main on SW 1St Avenue that runs along the a portion of the east side of the property. • An existing 12 -inch water main on SW 2nd Avenue that runs along portions of the west side of the property. This existing water main on SW 7th Street can be used to provide fire protection, domestic and landscape irrigation service for this project. B. Required Water System Improvements: Based on the Miami -Dade Water and Sewer Department (MD-WASD) criteria, the existing 12" Watermain on SW 7th Street is adequate to provide service to the proposed building. Additional offsite system improvements may be required by MD-WASD at the time of final design. C. Anticipated water use: The water use requirements for this project are calculated based on the build -out information shown on the following table. An additional flow demand of 89,749 GPD is expected from this project. L her" 03- 814 Since 1989 4. Sewer Collection System CIVIL LAND DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION A. Existing Sanitary Sewer System Facilities: (See exhibit "C") Miami -Dade Water & Sewer Department (MD-WASD) owns and operates the following sanitary sewer facilities in the vicinity of this project: • An existing 8 -inch gravity sewer line along SW 7th Street that runs westerly along the entire south side of the property. • An existing 12 -inch gravity sewer line along SW 2nd Avenue that runs northerly along a portion of the west side of the property. • An existing 30 -inch gravity sewer interceptor along SW 2nd Avenue that runs north along the west side of the property. • An existing 8 -inch gravity line within the property runs west to connect to the existing 30" interceptor line. B. Required Sanitary Sewer System Improvements: Based on MD-WASD criteria, the existing improvements are adequate to provide service to this project. The existing gravity sewer line within the property will have to be removed and abandoned in accordance with MD-WASD procedures in order to allow for the construction of the building. C. Transmission Capacity Requirements: The wastewater generated by this project will be conveyed to MD-WASD Pump Station No. 30-0001. This station has a yearly NAPOT of 4.35 hours per day according to DERM. (See exhibit "C"). The above referenced pump station has sufficient available capacity to support this project. Flows from this Pump Station are transmitted to MD-WASD treatment plant at Virginia Key. (� MI recor- iteng "7� 03 Qe n 13- 000OOR- 800..M.N Since 1989 5. Solid Waste Generation CIVIL LAND DEVELOPWNT TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION A. Solid Waste Generated by this project will be collected in standardized on- site containers for refuse and re-cyclables. Either hauling companies and/or the City of Miami Solid Waste Department will provide regular pick- up services. The anticipated daily solid waste generation for this project is 14.06 CY per day. (See exhibit "C") reE.... Ite y -7) JO ♦. �,r4i�r �.."4i�i'Q 03- 8 i t Since 1989 CIVIL LAND DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION EXHIBIT "A" Location Map su-t re" Item omen moms ci4y r,lerk Since 1989 CIVIL LAND DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION EXHIBIT "A" Location Map su-t re" Item ci4y r,lerk 03- 8il 11 J � TRACT ' OF P6 Q�Q PDQ 6 ID 9M s 750 �N S g � 12 13 14 I6 �• is S. W. 7TH ---STREET 1 1 I b j jl ID 9 e �Q. 7 KN LTc 1 52 _ l s MIAMI RIVER Jj UNPLATTED ctos[D S. W— 67v.ST.-- 91' ORD. X32 7 z 12 8 0 u I= !fi 17 16 --5. W.----7TH---STREET— �I, L. KNo TSN i Iz Ss -LOCATION MAP - (SCALE 1 "=200') City Clerk 03— s i t GMSU Wee, DUMB ammom Since 1989 CIVIL LAND DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION EXHIBIT 991331 Storm Drainage Calculations Submitted Into the public record in cunnect.. 11 W itemon *7 11 AS ,-;�Tt-,�--.rnpnoc PrisciOaOa . City Clerk 03- 31. Since 1989 CIVIL LAND DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION PROJECT NAME NEO VERTIKA 3/28/2003 DRAINAGE AREA: ENTIRE SITE Page 1 SITE DATA: SITE AREA = 2.22 ACRES BUILDING FOOT PRINT = 420 FT BUILDING HIGHT = 371 FT BUILDING WALL AREA = 3,58 ACRES CONTRIBUTING BUILDING AREA = 1.07 ACRES CONTRIBUTING AREA = 3.29 ACRES NUMBER OF WELLS = 4 CF REQUIRED VOLUME FOR 90 SEC. DETENTION TIME: CONTRIBUTING AREA PER WELL = 0.82 ACRES RAINFALL INTENSITY (90 SEC) = 6.4 IN/HR RUN OFF VOLUME (90 SEC) = 451 CF DETENTION VOLUME PROVIDED: TANK LENGTH = 15.00 FT TANK WIDTH = 7.50 FT TANK BOTTOM ELEV = -2.50 NGVD TOP OF WELL CASING ELEV = 2.50 NGVD STORAGE DEPTH = 5.00 FT DETENTION VOL PROVIDED = (per well) 563 CF TOTAL DETENTION VOLUME = 2,250 CF PiiSOsI��3 t—i. ��lL.d't , Iry.r�"L'3� City Cleric 03" 811 Since 1989 CIVIL LAND DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION PROJECT NAME NEO VERTIKA 3/28/2003 DRAINAGE AREA: ENTIRE SITE Page 2 DRAINAGE WELL DATA: WELL DIAMETER = 24 INCHES WELL DISCHARGE RATE PER FT OF HEAD = 700 GPM AVAILABLE HEAD = 3.00 FT DISCHARGE RATE PER WELL = 2,100 GPM CUMULATIVE INFLOW/OUTFLOW DATA: STORM FREQUENCY= 5 YEARS C FACTOR 0.95 ADJ. INFL. CF DRAINAGE AREA = 3.29 # OF WELLS PROVIDED 4 2250 ©� 8,400 GPM WON 18.72 CFS SEDIMENT TANK STORAGE = Since 1989 CIVIL LAND DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION PROJECT NAME NEO VERTIKA 3/28/2003 DRAINAGE AREA: ENTIRE SITE Page 2 DRAINAGE WELL DATA: WELL DIAMETER = 24 INCHES WELL DISCHARGE RATE PER FT OF HEAD = 700 GPM AVAILABLE HEAD = 3.00 FT DISCHARGE RATE PER WELL = 2,100 GPM CUMULATIVE INFLOW/OUTFLOW DATA: STORM FREQUENCY= 5 YEARS C FACTOR 0.95 ADJ. INFL. CF DRAINAGE AREA = 3.29 ACRES # OF WELLS PROVIDED 4 2250 TOTAL DISCHARGE RATE = 8,400 GPM TOTAL DISCHARGE RATE = 18.72 CFS SEDIMENT TANK STORAGE = 2,250. CF . F.D. STORAGE = 0 CF SOLID PIPE STORAGE = 0 CF INFLOW-EXFILTRATION TABLE TIME MIN INTEN. IN/HR CUM.INFLOW CF SYST. STO. CF ADJ. INFL. CF WELL DISCH. CF OVERFLOW CFS 8 6.41 9621 2250 7371 8984 -3.36 10 6.17 11579 2250 9329 11230 -3.17 15 5.64 15892 2250 13642 16845 -3.56 20 5.20 19528 2250 17278 22460 -4.32 30 4.50 25323 2250 23073 33690 -5.90 40 3.96 29734 2250 27484 44920 -7.26 60 3.20 36007 2250 33757 67380 -9.34 90 2.48 41900 2250 39650 101070 -11.37 120 2.03 45635 2250 43385 134759 -12.69 150 1.71 48213 2250 45963 168449 -13.61 180 1.48 50100 1 2250 47850 1 202139 -14.29 c C."Ity Uerk 0.3 - 811 Qn c� n r' 1 n Since 1989 • MD-WASD Water Atlas MD-WASD Sewer Atlas CIVIL LAND DEVELOPWNT TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION EXHIBIT "C" • Proposed Water Use Calculations • DERM Pump Station 30-0002 Monthly Information • Solid Waste Calculations a 7130 �" PRIVATE FIRE 1 SERVICE �-- 42`3 � �. . i.�u• _ io a 7jza16 117 LLJ* � 2 a I �RIVER 7783 2311 23lI iv 2311 ,%fl � D341 IY 1,127 ✓ 817 z oo wLi 8 cs I N T096• 7Q86 193 Q 4 - RE -PLA C v' 9 YrW 2DOi-0 .� 193 °Q � 5. W, T ST. /G• SW 7 Y. p,, ST Z 193 • . _ S f 93 193 9.39 •338 7783 gg 1 1 7 O 9 ER 1 25 3' o K #/09 2924 * 853 $3 vi X41 ST. s w. a S Y v 1 e' X29 , I g $Z6 449 f 16 j 339 9578 84 �� 719. 846 S2, C) 0. ? 1 MSM41- 6" to u'us ' MD-WASD WATER ATLAS � � �� �, i�E r�aR Gf/C—CK - s . VA / Vog ASSA-MA1 Y W ' a 41 w §0 5 05 ST ICY 117 30" 1 T > ge 08 sw 7 s 140 141 142 143 ;21R .4(, -3 2 3 E ,0 L" 12 T R A IHL --I ocr 14 X CD 93 MD-WASD SEWER ATLAS A 144 95 114 oj,c-cr LO A/ t93 4 Li - fte 146 0 4 6 210 209--A 2091 F15 i2o q 12 1.2-0-81 20 a -w t� :a .� AMEN EW .� ��� �J�� , iMEMNON On�0000��n Slnccc' ] 989 CIVIL LAND DEVELOPWNT TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION PROPOSED WATER USE CALCULATIONS PROJECT NEO VERTIKA DATE: 27 -Mar -03 TYPE OF BUILDING USE NUMBER [Units] RATE [gpd/unit] ADF [gpd] PROPOSED FLOWS: Condominium Units 443 200 88,600 Retail Commercial 18,689 0.10 1,869 Slnccc' ] 989 CIVIL LAND DEVELOPWNT TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION PROPOSED WATER USE CALCULATIONS PROJECT NEO VERTIKA DATE: 27 -Mar -03 TYPE OF BUILDING USE NUMBER [Units] RATE [gpd/unit] ADF [gpd] PROPOSED FLOWS: Condominium Units 443 200 88,600 Retail Commercial 18,689 0.10 1,869 SUB -TOTAL 90,469 PREVIOUS FLOWS: EXISITING BUILDING Office 3,000 0.10 300 Warehouse 23,000 0 460 'S' 113 760 NET INCREASE. °U I i, City Clerk =. ;- Pump Station Monthly Information Station..30 -0001 Atlas Pg..F14 AMI DADE WATER & SEWER DEPARTMENT �dr..390 NW NORTH RIVER DR Sec -Township -Range............ 1-54-41 Genr._ ET clock. _Y Telm.Y_ #Pumps. 8 T Pump ype.A Stn Class.M Speed.2 Hrspwr.+ Res flow(gpd) Proj Napot % Cap Plans.. 7,524,870 5.71 hrs 57.10 Plats.. 0 4.35 hrs 43.50 Extens. 0 4.35 hrs 43.50 <Plan Review> Moratorium -OK • , •••. MoratoriumeffectivesinceI / Yearly NAPOT (hrs)............ 4.35 Stn Gross Capacity(gpd)..221,760,000 Station Reduction Factor....... 0.60 Stn Net Cap Certif(gpd).. 0 Stn Net Capacity(gpd).... 133,056,000 Indicated Flows(gpd)..... 24,116,400 Date Mo.NAPOT Avg Daily Flows Rgd # Comments Flg Pmp 02/26/2003 3.93 27.54 0.00 Y 8 01/27/2003 3.81 26.70 0.00 Y 8 12/23/2002 3.72 26.05 0.00 Y 8 11/21/2002 3.90 27.33 0.00 Y 8 10/23/2002 4.19 29.31 0.00 8 09/24/2002 4.27 29.87 0.00 _Y Y 8 08/23/2002 4.11 28.80 0.00 Y 8 Signature..GARCIM Sign Date..03/23/2003 19:09:21.42 GOLD/M Station I<m>provement GOLD/S <S>tation Inform. GOLD/U <U>pstream Station GOLD/D <D>ownstream Station GOLD/P <P>ump Information GOLD/G Codes & Cata<g>ories GOLD/T Sewer Cer<t>ification public 71. o p on City Clerk 03- 811 0n�r�n�e AREA/UNITS [sq [seats] RATE [Ib/sfj [Ib/seat] SOLID WASTE GENERATED [Ib] SOLID WASTE GENERATED [tons] Condominium Units ran 8 Q_M0���� 1.77 Retail 18,969 0.025 474 0.24 NET INCREASE: Since ] 989 CIVIL LAND DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION PROPOSED SOLID WASTE CALCULATIONS PROJECT NEO VERTIKA DATE: 28 -Mar -03 TYPE OF BUILDING USE AREA/UNITS [sq [seats] RATE [Ib/sfj [Ib/seat] SOLID WASTE GENERATED [Ib] SOLID WASTE GENERATED [tons] Condominium Units 443 8 3,544 1.77 Retail 18,969 0.025 474 0.24 NET INCREASE: 4,018 2.01 ANTICIPATED SOLID WASTE VOLUME AT 7 CY PER TON: 14.06 CY / DAY tub ,, , a 11 �� ?n public item P2,: Priscilla A. Tho„,,pson City Clerk 031— 811 NEO VERTIKA Economic Impact Analysis Submitted to: City of Miami Prepared For: QUANTUM CONSUL TING Prepared by: SHARPTON, BRUNSON & COMPANY, P.A. One Southeast Third Avenue Suite 2100 Miami, Florida 33131 (305) 374-1574 S re Prise i a A.t Y ri e City Clerk NEO VERTIKA TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE(S) THE PROJECT OVERVIEW 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction 2 Summary of Benefits 3 OBJECTIVES AND DEFINITIONS Objectives 5 Definition of Economic and Tax Impact 5 Direct and Indirect Effects 5 Measures of Economic Impact 6 Description of Results 7 DISCUSSION OF THE RESULTS BY ECONOMIC INDICATORS Impact Indicators Results of Indicators Impact of Construction Impact of Ongoing Operations Impact on Local Tax Revenues Analysis by Economic Indicators Employment Wages Output Local Taxes Public Sector Cost Impact Fees EXHIBITS Exhibit I: Summary of Economic Impact Exhibit II: Impact and Other Fees 8 8 8 9 9 9 9 10 10 11 12 12 13 t`,r Clerk Project Overview Neo Vertika will be 33 story condominium building located on 7th Street and 2nd Avenue on the Miami River. The Project consists of 443 units, 24,000 square feet of retail space and 575 parking spaces. The total lot area is 95,832 square feet (2.2 acres). Neo Vertika will capitalize on its location on the ricer and steps away from Brickell, in reaching a mid level market of professionals and first home buyers you are looking for an affordable product in an urban living environment. The Project will be within walking distance of Brickell, minutes from downtown, the new Performing Arts Center, the American Airlines Arena, diverse restaurants and clubs. The development team and the architectural firm of Revuelta Vega Leon have strived to differentiate the project from the competition by providing an innovative concept in two story spaces which will allow for individual creativity. In addition to the Project's in-house amenities, the unit owners will be able to enjoy a waterfront restaurant and bar as well as the proposed River Walk which will extend from the mouth of the Miami River. The Building will have an amenities deck on the 7th floor deck overlooking the river and with views of downtown and Brickell. Amongst the amenities offered are an oversized pool and waterfall bath, sauna, steam, racquetball court, fully equipped business center, clubhouse, business center, Concierge and 24 security. 1 03 City Clerk Introduction This document represents an in-depth economic and tax benefits analysis of the developmental and operation of a first class condominium building and retail facilities. The Project currently contemplated is comprised of the following components: ❑ 443 units of high-quality residential. ❑ 24,000 square feet of retail/restaurant ❑ 575 parking spaces. This analysis encompasses the entire Project and estimates the economic and tax benefits for both its developmental and operational phases. ��-tlgc 2 Summary of Benefits The Project will bring significant economic benefits to the city of Miami (the City). This section summarizes the impact of the project on employment, public sector revenues and other economic benefits as a result of the development. Employment Employment considerations include the direct employment resulting from the Project. Average developmental construction phase employment will be for approximately 260 employees and the Project management is expected to employ 26 people for on-going maintenance and operations of the facilities. Wages To compute the wages associated with the new employment we started with budgeted data directly related to the developmental and operational phases of the Project, and we incorporated data from our research on retail sales. Total direct and indirect impacts expected from wages associated with the new development approximate the following: One Time $28,826,928 Annual $ 977,184 Tax Revenue The estimate of the public sector revenues associated with the development includes taxes and other revenues generated directly by the Project. Although public sector costs are important elements in measuring fiscal impact, these benefits have not been quantified in this document. This analysis only measures the benefits derived from the development. Annual tax revenue expected to be created totals $2,286,161. Output The estimate of total economic impact is measured by total output. This analysis measures the economic impact of developmental costs and ongoing, operational expenditures. To determine the effect of respending within the City, we utilized a multiplier to compute total direct and indirect benefits. Total output expected to be generated, as a result of the developmental and operational phases of the Project will approximate the following: One Time $ 129,362,882 Annual $ 2,029,536 tecoru Item Pz--t Ly rterk 3 Summary of Benefits Significant Community Benefits: > Jobs > Wages > Taxes > Economic Activity Residents' and Retal I/Restau rant Employees' Spending Impacting Local Businesses: ➢ Food > Recreation/Entertainment > Transportation ➢ Retail The following table and charts summarize the economic impact of the South Bayshore development. CONSTRUCTION PERIOD ANNUAL IMPACT RECURRING Economic Activity Stimulated Output $129,362,882 $ 2,029,536 Wages 28,826,928 977,184 Taxes 2,286,161 $158,189,810 $ 5,292,881 Jobs Created 260 26 lid 4 pris 811 Objectives And Definitions Objectives The objective of this analysis is to provide information on the various benefits created by the Project and to prepare an estimate of such benefits to the City. Our analysis is based on an economic model, which estimates economic and tax impacts of various projects on a designated area. The model is specifically tailored to the City of Miami (the City). Definition of Economic and Tax Impact The construction and subsequent operation of the Project will create important benefits within the City. These benefits include new income, new jobs, new tax revenue and new economic activity impacting upon every sector of the local economy. Moreover, through the multiplier effect of respending and reinvesting, indirect economic benefits are added to the direct benefits brought about by initial construction expenditures, the expenditures from ongoing operations and new spending at the retail enterprises. Direct and Indirect Effects The total economic impact of public and private projects and policies on a region does not end with the impact from the initial construction expenditures; the continued benefits to the local economy must also be considered. Income to firms furnishing construction materials and services is subsequently converted into employee salaries, material purchases, investment in plant and equipment, savings, profits, purchases of services, and a variety of other economic activities. Income to laborers is subsequently 03- respent J-- respent for purchasing of food, housing, transportation, education, entertainment, medical and dental services, clothing, personal services, and a wide variety of other goods and services. Furthermore, income to the governmental unit is respent as salaries, purchases, and support of a variety of programs, including education, transportation, and social services. In turn, individuals, firms, and governments furnishing these goods and services again spend their income for more purchases, salaries, investments, and savings. In this manner, indirect benefits result each time the initial sum is respent, and the additional sum available in the local economy induces further job creation, business development and savings. Quantification of these indirect benefits has been the object of considerable economic study. Because economic relationships are so complex in our modern society, no single area or political unit is a completely self-contained economic unit. Therefore, purchases from other areas and political units are necessary, and goods services are exported in return. As purchases are made from other units, some of the benefits of economic respending are lost to the local economy. Ultimately, a smaller and smaller portion of the initial sum would remain, until, after several rounds of respending, an insignificant sum is left. SSG. agr�y t o3 .. AY Died ka Objectives And Definitions The indirect effects can be viewed as a set of "ripples" in the economy. Indirect, like direct, resources require labor, materials, equipment and services for their production to induce further job creation and spending of wages. The "ripple" of the indirect effect multiplies the original impact of the purchase. The common measure of the magnitude of the "ripple" effect is called a multiplier. A multiplier measures the total magnitude of the impact on each particular economic indicator as a multiple of the initial, direct effect. For instance, a multiplier of 1" would signify no "ripple" effects as the total impact is 1 times the initial impact, while a multiplier of "2" would imply that the total impact is 2 times the direct effect. The actual magnitude of a multiplier depends on the likelihood the goods and services purchased in a region would be produced in, or provided from the region. The model we used to estimate the total economic impact incorporates a multiplier developed by utilizing past consumption and production patterns in the City. There will be significant economic benefit derived from the expenditures of the residents of the Project on eating, drinking, grocery, recreation, retail etc. This report does not include the economic impact of such expenditures. Measures of Economic Impact Various measures can be used to indicate the impact of a policy or project on a region. Specifically, for this study, they are the increases in local employment, wages, tax revenue and output that result. Definitions of these measures are as follows: Employment is measured full-time equivalent jobs. Wages include wages, salaries, and proprietor's income only. They may include non -wage compensation, such as pensions, insurance, and other fringe benefits. Wages are assumed to be expended by households in the area at which the wage-earner works. Local taxes include additional revenues from both ad valorem and non ad valorem assessments. Direct expenditures include those sums expended for land acquisition, site preparation and all hard and soft costs associated with a project. Indirect expenditures are those sums expended within the local economy as a result of the "ripple" effect described earlier. Output describes total economic activity, and is essentially equivalent to the sum of direct and indirect expenditures (exclusive of wages and taxes). �+ 6 4�P 2 ._ -7_ 3 City Clerk Objectives And Definitions Description of Results For the purpose of describing the total economic benefits of the Project, the related expenditures and economic activity stimulated have been broken into two categories: Developmental Annual Recurring Developmental expenditures include those expenditures related to the design and construction phase of the Project and related amenities. Annual recurring activities stimulated are those expenditures incurred in connection with the ongoing operation of the Project, and the sales and expenditures of the retail enterprises leasing space at the Project. t� 7 Prksci,li"--t- V -son r oe . Got? Clerk *�- 811 Discussion Of The Results By Economic Indicators Impact Indicators We measured the Project's impact on four commonly used indicators of economic activity. Those indicators are: Jobs Wages Total output Local taxes Results of Indicators Exhibit I details the Project's direct and indirect impact on the above economic indicators for Miami. A summary of such impact follows: The economic indicator most commonly measured, and publicly reported on to gauge the economic impact of a public project is output. The impact of a project on the indicator output is often referred to as the project's economic impact. Impact of Construction The site preparation and construction expenditures, including soft costs and impact fees are estimated at $62 million. Such activity will create approximately 267 new full time equivalent jobs and employ a maximum of 300 workers during peak periods. The workers will earn approximately $15.3 million in direct wages. DEVELOPMENT (One Time) OUTPUT WAGES TAXES EMPLOYMENT Direct $ 68,839,337 $ 15,340,000 260 Indirect 60,523,545 13,486,928 $ 129.362.882 $ 28.826.928 260 ANNUAL Operational: Direct $ 1,080,000 $ 514,448 $1,494,514 26 Indirect 949.536 45210 $ 2,029.536 $ 977,184 I2.286.161 26 r i���dysY �•_�4 .. ' �gi1 2 �A� Rh .iiY Giants Discussion Of The Results By Economic Indicators Impact of Ongoing Operations As a result of the on-going operation and maintenance of the Project, Miami will gain approximately 26 new, permanent, full-time equivalent jobs. The wages of the workers who obtain these positions will provide an impact of approximately $977 thousand annually. The total expenditures for the Project's operations, will provide a new, permanent impact of $7.2 million annually to the City's economy. This impact consists of the effects of the direct expenditures from the maintenance, security and day-to-day operation of the Project, and the multiplied effects of such spending thus creating indirect benefits. Impact on Local Tax Revenues As a result of the construction and operation of the Project, various state, city and city governments and agencies would gain an estimated annual tax benefit of $2.3 million. Analysis by Economic Indicators Our analysis of the economic and tax benefits of the Project was done by each major phase of the Project. We identified the major phases to be developmental and operational. This analysis determines the economic benefits to the City by identifying such benefits for each of the phases. The effects on economic indicators used to measure benefits (employment, wages, output and taxes) were computed for each phase. Employment Employment is one of the most important economic benefits of the Project. It is one of the most accessible and direct benefits for the City's residents and it's residents and is a primary means by which developmental, operational and maintenance expenditures generate indirect economic benefits. A portion of this employment occurs on-site as a result of new spending at the retail enterprises, and a portion is derived from on-going operations of the Project. Further employment is generated off-site by the expenditures of employees of the Project and businesses located in the Project, at area businesses. As can be seen in Exhibit I, total short-term (developmental) employment will average 260 employees over an twenty-seven month period and a total on-going employment will average 26. The total on-going positions can be summarized as follows: Management Security Parking Maintenance/Facilities Retail Discussion Of The Results By Economic Indicators Wages The analysis deemed wages are a direct by-product of employment. As discussed in the above section, both on-site and off- site jobs are created. There were both temporary and permanent in nature. To compute the wages associated with the new employment we started with budgeted data directly related to the developmental and operational phases of the Project. Employment, such as construction related employment, was obtained directly from construction estimates. These numbers were tested for reasonableness. Output The output generated, as a result of the development and operations of the Project, is caused by the following type of expenditures: Development costs expended in the City (100%) Annual operational expenditures of management company New spending in the locality by employees of businesses located in the Project To incorporate the impact of dollars being respent and/or reinvested in the City, a multiplier was applied to total direct output. A multiplier of 1.8792 was used to determine total direct and indirect output created by the Project. This multiplier indicates that for every $100 spent in Miami, another $187.92 will be respent or reinvested in Miami. This multiplier was obtained from the Dade City Planning Department. Direct output from the developmental phase of the Project is primarily a result of developer costs. These costs include land acquisition, site preparation and soft and hard costs relating to the Project's construction. To determine the total output we determined what development costs were expected to be or had been spent in Miami. Total direct output during the development phase is $68.8 million. Total indirect output created by the direct respending in Miami is $60.5 million. Thus total Miami Output from the development of the Project is $129.3 million. The final component of output results from the direct operating expenditures of the Project, and the indirect benefits created as a result of the multiplier effect on direct output. The Developer provided us with an annual operating budget for the Project. An overall assumption was made that all expenditures would be spent initially in the City. 10 !pity Clerk Discussion Of The Results By Economic Indicators Output (Contd.) The total operating expenditures incorporate all estimated expenses of the ongoing operation of the Project. The impact of the retail enterprises was measured separately as an economic indicator. To incorporate the potential respending and reinvesting in Miami, the multiplier effect was measured. By applying a multiplier of 1.8792 to the total direct output from operating expenditures and the retail enterprises, we determined total output (direct and indirect) from on- going operating expenditures and retail sales. Local Taxes A key and significant benefit generated from the development and operation of the Project is taxes. Several types of tax revenue will be generated from this project including ad valorem taxes. Specific ad valorem taxes include real and personal property taxes. Other taxes include occupational taxes and community development taxes. New real property taxes will be assessed on the Project. The assessment is based on a predetermined mileage rate being applied to the taxable value of the real property. We computed real property taxes for the developmental phase based on the cost of the development of the Project. This assessment base is very conservative since tax on real property typically is assessed on appraised values and not actual cost. The basis for ongoing taxes is also overall cost. The mileage rate was obtained from the City Tax Collectors office relative to the Project's location. The projected annual real property taxes are approximately $1.5 million. Total ad valorem taxes assessed by Miami -Dade County are allocated based on mileage rates to certain governmental entities. Listed below is the allocation of projected tax revenue. City Operating $ 740,561 City Miscellaneous 41,840 School Operating 709,768 County Operating 492,788 Debt Service - City 101,921 Debt Service -County 32,635 South Florida Water 49,957 Library Operating 40,668 School Debt Service 64,433 Florida Inland Navigation 3,222 Environmental Projects 8.368 TOTAL $ 2,286,161 7� !iubl! '+� _ vA h ti+ PL -1 -, City Clerk Discussion Of The Results By Economic Indicators Local Taxes (Contd.) Although not quantified, the City, through its receipt of allocated state sales taxes will receive an additional benefit as a result of the development and operation of the Project, and from the retail enterprises. Public Sector Costs Impact fees Very significant factors in measuring the economic impact on a specific region of a project are impact and other required development fees. A summary of these fees are listed below: City of Miami Developmental Impact Fee City of Miami Developmental Admin Fee � Downtown Devi. Supplemental Fee Miami -Dade County School Impact Fee Building Permit Fee Installation Energy Fee Other Fees For the purpose of this economic impact analysis, fees are included as a part of the direct development cost (output). Impact fees total approximately $1.3 million and other fees total approximately $927 thousand. These fees are shown in detail in Exhibit II. pubfidt reg item I ;, th 12 Pric�a►=�.� on City Clerk Exhibit List Exhibit I Summary of Economic Impact Exhibit II Impact and Other Fees 'Uma 13 teco nd f tem Z,. City Clerk 03- 811 Exhibit -1 TOTAL DEVELOPMENTA $ 129,362,881 TOTAL OPERATIONAL 2,029,536 $ 28,826,928 260 977,184 26 $ 2,286,161 TOTAL BENEFITS $ 131,392,417 $ 29,804,112 286 $ 2,286,161 nub j a _2I 14 OUTPUT WAGES EMPLOYMENT TAXES DIRECT DEVELOPMENTAL $ 68,839,336 $ 15,340,000 260 OPERATIONAL 1,080,000 520,000 26 $ 2,286,161 TOTAL DIRECT 69,919,336 15,860,000 286 2,286,161 INDIRECT DEVELOPMENTAL 60,523,545 13,486,928 OPERATIONAL 949,536 457,184 TOTAL INDIRECT 61,473,081 13,944,112 TOTAL BENEFITS $ 131,392,417 $ 29,804,112 286 $ 2,286,161 TOTAL DEVELOPMENTA $ 129,362,881 TOTAL OPERATIONAL 2,029,536 $ 28,826,928 260 977,184 26 $ 2,286,161 TOTAL BENEFITS $ 131,392,417 $ 29,804,112 286 $ 2,286,161 nub j a _2I 14 Exhibit -11 (IMPACT AND OTHER FEES: IA. Development Square Footages: Square Footage 1) Total gross building area (with parking) 903,920 2) Maximum development area (FAR) 470,038 3) Gross parking area 270,250 1B. Impact Fees: Amount 1) City of Miami Developmental Impact Fee $ 470,328 2) Developmental Impact Administration Fee 13,103 3) Downtown Development Supplemental Fee 141,127 4) Miami -Dade County School Impact Fee 698,124 Total of all Impact Fees $ 1,322,681 IC. Non -Impact Fees: 1) Miami Dade W .A.S.A. "connection fees" $ 619,314 2) Building Permit Fee 147,080 3) Installation Energy Fee 90,392 4) Major Use Special Permit Application Fee 30,000 5) Miami -Dade County Code Compliance 24,400 6) Radon Gas Fee 4,520 7) Fire Plan Review Fee 8,587 8) Ground Cover Fee 663 9) Land Use/Zoning 1,354 10) Zoning Review for Building Permit Fee 60 11) Certificate of Occupancy Fee 250 12) Application Fee 35 Total of all Non -Impact Fees $ 926,655 Total of all Fees for Project $ 2,249,336 Source: City of Miami Planning, Building and Zoning Department. Miami Dade County Impact Fees _ g Aon Clem 15 1_ W in in co C O .M 0) in co .a 0 t C M c •L co CD IM MIAMI RIVER 1DR7L1 TYING Ll s' PLAT. A' MEAN GAPPRO N THIP TYING EDM OF PILO, R CONC. SNIP IYIr1G WATER ELEV.- L55'2 VSTER 7 T OF�r 2.6' CONC. 9ULKHEA .upTER s� /, ASPHALT PAVEMENT - 47.40' Inc My�.sA1�Q� N�75�41'S3"E�ZSc.s�.ssx � r �� p`S _ F.F.E.= 6.59' ' art eel W ---�-- --� c I--- —WCU w I wZ w I I ;, f- / 3�� � N � �D 03 3 ED I I \ Q Qs COhIC.FL00R y1`�4•<F+' I 4 ( F.F.E.= 6.53' I `Jyti + I ASPHALT PAVEMENT 2 3 I <7.40' 3.77 fi 2a.-- t•- 0 I ave I N.N Q O U Co. 20 o I Z I IDili 5 1 4a try N I` cA we� ----�------+-- ',—' Z UO CCI FN j+� n',d IIY C.B.S MALL'` Iovy _77 aver„ J w I ~ Ny➢RAUC L s E LU 15 in N lfi i 17 I W g I m :,umrRraa S N�� 19 aN.0 = Ice ❑ Do 6 Ui O 21m Z� FIP I/r / V' 249,7% F, 'I/--- 1.k I/ 7' �ZJ P a I EB / S.89'24'S2^N. i r. ...:' b' St �WALK 12' CURB & UTTER 0.7'X i CWA`L NMENTI CITY DF M1AMr MON UM NT LINE I�' S. W. L 7TH— STREE I — CURB fs TT � DGE UFPAVEMENT ^ -- -y---i� — Tct — -- BLOCK 52 SOUTH (B-41) NOTE: a) All clearances and/or encroachments shown hereon are of the apparent nature, fence legal ownership not determined. b) The issue of this survey Is only for the exclusive and specific use of those persons, parties or institutions in the certification. c) Code restrictions not reflected In this survey d) Underground utilities and encroachments, if any not located. e) The flood information shown hereon does not imply that the subject property will or will not be free from flooding or damage and does not create liability on the part of the firm or employee thereof, for any damage that occurs from reliance on said information. f) Lands depicted hereon were surveyed per legal description provided by client and no claims as to ownership or matters of title are made or implied. g) All roads shown hereon are public unless otherwise noted. h) No identification cap found on property comers unless otherwise noted. 1) Distance along boundary are record and measured unless otherwise noted. j) The graphic portions of this document are intended to be displayed at the graphiciname scales as depicted. Said scale may be altered in reproductions and as such, should be considered when obtaining scaled data. Boundary Survey 0 ;o so g0 CRAPHIC SCALP SCALE: 1"=30' (SCALE IN FEET) &I :. City Clerk x a A vRL L.F.Elev. = denotes lowest habitable floor elevation. Surveyor and Mapper. A= I o a Lu Z _EY = Air Conditioner �M W Yt' EJI a y 3 I O = Asphalt / s _ BBQ Z ! _ BM LLJ z CB = Catch basin a I z ,IN F m I p,F ASL-_ C.P. C7I .VI 4k P LLH. W I C.I. = Curb Inlet 50' iE LIIR I i I .M. FdrN4 H. 43y ALK WWWWII 4%0TER GETf Conc.= FNAD� h a� Boundary Survey 0 ;o so g0 CRAPHIC SCALP SCALE: 1"=30' (SCALE IN FEET) &I :. City Clerk LEGAL DESCRIPTIOW M - Measured Loh I thru S and the Easterly 230.00 of Treat "A", Block 393, and Loh 18, Id - Monument Line 17, 20 and 21. Block 39S. of Amended Plat of stock 39 South, according to M.C. = Metal Cover the plat thereof, orecorded in Plat book 42, at Page 6. of the Public Records f Miami — Dade County, Florida, and the East 100.00 feet f Lot. 1a, red 19, M.L.P. =Metal LgM Pole Block 39S• City of Miami, according to the Plat thereof recorded In Plot Book 9 N/D - Nail & DISC at Page 41,f the Public Record. of the Public Records of Miami — Dade County, Florida. NI - Number NTS = Not to Scale O.W. - Observation Well s u R V E Y 0 R'S N 0 T E S: O.U.L. = Overhead Utility Lines P = Plat 1. This sketch represent. a "Land surrey". Pe = Plat Book 2. Property shown herwn aoolalns 941,653.18 is square feet (2.223 acres). PC - Point of Curvature Intauding 2.157.33 square feet of Submerge Lands. PCP - Permanent Control Point 3. Then an nc r[,Ibl. encroachments other than nes. shown he—. .r -,r.." 4. All easements and rights—of—way pursuant to T"t Commitment No. 3 A.1, = Pomt'af lrlteraecilori'' s 300207521, by Chicago Title Insurance company. am shown herwn. PKWY > Parkway 3. Property, shown herwn Iles within Federal Zone 'AE", Ft =, Property Line 6. Legal Description of property shown heron was taken off of the �;; PL = Planter 7 - above mentioned nn. Commitment. PLS - Professional Land Surveyor 7. Property shown herwn has 20 marked parktng sp.aes. P.011111111. - Point of Beginning. _ .� 8. Visible 0111114. only ars shown, underground utilrfb. not located, P.O.C. = Point of Commencement 9. This firm has made no aHempt to locate foundatlom mw1/or foaten P.P. - Power Pole " unl - otherwise noted. P.R.M. - Point of Reference Monument PF - Point of Tangency i /0 " L{d R = Radius; - I HEREBY CERTIFY, '- RTI That the aneehM "Boundary Survey" at Ins property Res. =Residence =--v-'--- dawNb•d hereon le true ori earrecf to the best of my knowledge and bener Mi.. S. -. Reglatered Land Surveyor as rwentlTr wrveyed and drawn under my supervision. This survey meets the : .r .. Mlnimum Twhnloal Standards in Chapter 61017-6 FTonda Adminletrotlw Code, pursuant to Section 427.07, Florldo StaNtea. I further aortlfy that this RNG = Range " sketah and the survey which N To based we as. In accordance WIM RM =Railroad er Minimum Standard Detail Requirement. t ALTA/ACSM Lad This Survey.". Jolnhy established and adopted by ALTA and ACSM In 1997, one RSM = .Registered rveypr & Me per, mast the accuracy requirements of Class A" surrey, as d0l.ed marefn. R/W = Right•of ay '' rAly esvry d Associates, I no. Swk. = Sidew=Treeon gusevhw �zPalmetto Incurvyar and Mapper No. 4327` /9 Stat/ 01 Florida FOR: Not valid unless it bears the A = Central Angle L.F.Elev. = denotes lowest habitable floor elevation. Surveyor and Mapper. A= Arc Muni RIVER A/C = Air Conditioner S.W. ist Ave. Elev.= 8.354 ASPH = Asphalt / s _ BBQ = Barbecue 7, BM =Bench Mark CB = Catch basin CBS = Concrete Block Structure C.P. = Concrete Pole C.I. = Curb Inlet = Center Line --I r •^ry ,r, - CLF Cl. — Chain Link Fence - Clear Conc.= Concrete a� Comm. = Communication t 0 =Diameter –LOCATION MAP– DH - Drill Hole DME = Drainage & Maintenance Easl _ (SCALE 1'=200') Easm't Enc. = Easement - Encroachment F.H. = Fire Hydrant Fnd. = Found FPL = Florida Power & Light I.P. = Iron Pipe ' LB = Licensed Business L.S. = Land Surveyor LEGAL DESCRIPTIOW M - Measured Loh I thru S and the Easterly 230.00 of Treat "A", Block 393, and Loh 18, Id - Monument Line 17, 20 and 21. Block 39S. of Amended Plat of stock 39 South, according to M.C. = Metal Cover the plat thereof, orecorded in Plat book 42, at Page 6. of the Public Records f Miami — Dade County, Florida, and the East 100.00 feet f Lot. 1a, red 19, M.L.P. =Metal LgM Pole Block 39S• City of Miami, according to the Plat thereof recorded In Plot Book 9 N/D - Nail & DISC at Page 41,f the Public Record. of the Public Records of Miami — Dade County, Florida. NI - Number NTS = Not to Scale O.W. - Observation Well s u R V E Y 0 R'S N 0 T E S: O.U.L. = Overhead Utility Lines P = Plat 1. This sketch represent. a "Land surrey". Pe = Plat Book 2. Property shown herwn aoolalns 941,653.18 is square feet (2.223 acres). PC - Point of Curvature Intauding 2.157.33 square feet of Submerge Lands. PCP - Permanent Control Point 3. Then an nc r[,Ibl. encroachments other than nes. shown he—. .r -,r.." 4. All easements and rights—of—way pursuant to T"t Commitment No. 3 A.1, = Pomt'af lrlteraecilori'' s 300207521, by Chicago Title Insurance company. am shown herwn. PKWY > Parkway 3. Property, shown herwn Iles within Federal Zone 'AE", Ft =, Property Line 6. Legal Description of property shown heron was taken off of the �;; PL = Planter 7 - above mentioned nn. Commitment. PLS - Professional Land Surveyor 7. Property shown herwn has 20 marked parktng sp.aes. P.011111111. - Point of Beginning. _ .� 8. Visible 0111114. only ars shown, underground utilrfb. not located, P.O.C. = Point of Commencement 9. This firm has made no aHempt to locate foundatlom mw1/or foaten P.P. - Power Pole " unl - otherwise noted. P.R.M. - Point of Reference Monument PF - Point of Tangency i /0 " L{d R = Radius; - I HEREBY CERTIFY, '- RTI That the aneehM "Boundary Survey" at Ins property Res. =Residence =--v-'--- dawNb•d hereon le true ori earrecf to the best of my knowledge and bener Mi.. S. -. Reglatered Land Surveyor as rwentlTr wrveyed and drawn under my supervision. This survey meets the : .r .. Mlnimum Twhnloal Standards in Chapter 61017-6 FTonda Adminletrotlw Code, pursuant to Section 427.07, Florldo StaNtea. I further aortlfy that this RNG = Range " sketah and the survey which N To based we as. In accordance WIM RM =Railroad er Minimum Standard Detail Requirement. t ALTA/ACSM Lad This Survey.". Jolnhy established and adopted by ALTA and ACSM In 1997, one RSM = .Registered rveypr & Me per, mast the accuracy requirements of Class A" surrey, as d0l.ed marefn. R/W = Right•of ay '' rAly esvry d Associates, I no. Swk. = Sidew=Treeon gusevhw �zPalmetto Incurvyar and Mapper No. 4327` /9 Stat/ 01 Florida FOR: Not valid unless it bears the ELEVATION NOTE: (IF APPLICABLE) signature and the original raised seal of Florida licensed L.F.Elev. = denotes lowest habitable floor elevation. Surveyor and Mapper. Elevation shown hereon refer to N.G.V.D. 1929. Lowest adjacent grade elevation= City of Miami BM, N&D @ N.W. Cor., S. ST. & S.W. ist Ave. Elev.= 8.354 Garage Elev.= . Erp.= se FLOOD INFORMATION: FLOOD ZONE: COMM. No. PANEL No, SI IFFIX: F:LR"M.DATE BASE ELEV. AE 1 120611 0191 1 J 1 3/2/02 - 9.00' N.G.V.D. I E - UtflIty Easement Uvihy TI�KAPP4 LediSa� ' W.M. = 34fa0r Meter Alvarez, Aiguesvlves'and- Associates, I nc. L.B. No. 6867 Surveyors, Mappers and Land Planners 8230 Coral Way, (suite -B) Miami, FL 33155 Phone 305-220-2424 Fax 305-552-8181 Field Date Scale: File: Drwg. No, 9/27/02 1 " = 30' I BLOCK39S 02-4773 NEO VERT11KA S.W. 7TH. ST. & S. W. 1ST. AVE. MIAMI- FLORIDA Tl T T. T T T � T T T NEO 3375 S.W. 3 RD AVE. IvIIAhg - FLORIDA 33145 .ARCHITECT R E V U E L T A V E G A L E O N P. A. ARCHITECTURE INTERIOR DESIGN PLANNING 2560 SW. 27TH AVENUE ft A FLORIDA 33L33 (305)-529-1080 LIST OF DRAWINGS ARCHITECTURAL A-00 COVER SIRET & LIST OF DRAWINGS A-OOA PROJECT DATA A-OOB S]TE PLAN A-1 LEVEL 1 A-2 LEVEL 2 A-3 LEVEL 3 A-4 LEVEL. 4 A-5 LEVEL 5 A-6 LEVEL 6 A-7 Abffi RIIF3 LEVEL A-8 LEVEL 8 A-0 LEVEL 9 A-10 LEVELS 10 , 12 , 14 , 16 A -B LEVELS 11 , 13 .15 . 17 A-12 LEVELS 18 , 20 , 22 , 24 A-13 LEVELS 19 , 21 , 23 , 25 A-14 LEVEL 26 A-15 LEVEL 27 A-16 LEVELS 28. 3D . 32 A-17 LEVELS 29 , A , 33 A-18 NORTH ELEVATION A-19 SOUTH ELEVATION A-20 WEST ELEVATIDN A-21 FAST ELEVATION A-22 BUILDING SECTION A A-23 BUILDING SECTION B r r - MUSP SUBMITTAL y MARCH 26, 2003 Z 0 Lu Lj U W =I wi 71 Lu tall R V L 2%0 SW. Dth Aft " M" R nM (7 W) 539-1080 6.U4 529.2= S.i II P'*- D�w. -7 lis O. Revue. ooff, 7 I T D A Submitted Into the public recrord in item _2- ! �oir7 t�j Priscilla A. Th Upson - City Clerk 26-03 F/JCS -oma 16'd -O" X224 i`I(, 0 3 _ 811 E 9,Pa,wW r GENERAL NOTES < t 'a. rw.,,+ai w�°�a •w w wu. ria r ,e.a ri.,.a ti M++p� «u,� x:73 .tt ay.n...w .p'+r �r« sesv w. w ,i L w ru®Arw. w416ea.,. vleF M,eu �,eAwewe ae. N.iw. a r iw. n � . r.�.l. °6°'drI"wuuw nom. � wiI w �a'a.« m�Wtt'p rW e1leF! „wwaar. rwe�wwuww wre .nr+«,ua. , • rMa rw uM ,IED wM w 0.�we•-MM wM�r� i r M FSMIm er r.rate b 0. 1�� es M �a.si rbE rwwe�sru.a�M wI aM' • O Fiir § � s Fair aae wrww r are rrwran 9,P..r, w www,e enisw rAA My.wbM bw orw w � � en r ,..par mewl a bArFn' .Wrr.+. wiwM A. ^�'al. w M Nrra.1 w b ss Mw, � ��FN.rN � r�yr« whine w ab wr b _ -~ A- •. =-Z rimer eaemna Mw .r r v,. � qua .w�•usin r�•.•tip rw uiip F Yr Yt rr ae awn e•N«. bw ewi I. a Men, w, .rar..w +, w ,r a.0 V -C F -F, iiiWeuNwa'a 3... N �I. ".w 4rY.rr. w.4 +re r.. u rrae2 �npruw,wm4, r car. a. ewr wrar M rrn amber w4nn e.1 a wr. 9 � rr^+« us.I•e. m p+. w.r a r.re.. s r a. s wI D) r a craw ss r'ar'w rnrw Vwew auA.rYr, a. wwebr wW Q TVP. H.C. PARKING STRIPING Q TVP. PARKING STRIPING Q TVP. HAND" SYMBOL . o-4ar wvs .73.1.4 bwweww + m waw« s ••+:' •w M .eww ° n„ NTS Nrs Nu ma..n �. aw,w.nr. b yw,...bw « �w nrawr a we war. ar p.w . « rte• r pn'r'^...: +: bw"«rr` :.waw � yy � : «�� p � ... ,.... % w`"w"w...a'"."i....ra1 a: r ::'.tee. IN � �,. «""rrirr.'?"° ri' Y Ixt >. Gewv IwnY ,•r•'••aw ewwLeM M ,aa• Y •scrum %, rN,w '��°w � i w•�' • a wuwawl �w, wW, .abr r rMrlen wr b be:.l :.` +".a�`..�,w�.,:I.r . « ^•k` �i _"_""_'F.»• . «.. af'w...r..nwa �'r� wre .eW e W W eeW er W,6 � w'ro r 'Yl rbraa"«« Saar a�wrw"'w.. e:•`"""A+ree7'. m ".-«�.wa. � ,a. , rwr:.:.w a� " t"f.°'�'e...r""wP«rm::.'.rw'°".`i.°"ti .wee".° 1 0. evw 9rnw ♦•nA,er r a ar.er Yie1 «•r•�iob w « wwawrw r «tiro+ pa«Y. a..rry � �� Yw SCM ryFwyeu�wyw « ew a wwwwwMww,�w1 « wii i A1M•rL 4 b m rAw,/••�MrYr,•i mw [aiw wwtwur.�F w0. ra w,wn W w •,r'W lrralN'wn ««yrs M • sulsY �Z(ROIRD AND BOOR SURFACES " "r"• ^1'rE ,� �� ..b. r"r"0.....b ,«. w .w vD rt EOIiuLEo 4 NTS Mr r «:.yr M.t: w.a •Jw ..Nir wr a �aM �„ ,,.,er.w.w^C •pF OISA9IED L r W 4ietlY YRONLY [„eb,,, wv u. r wNw rwwa M ewm •'siM~aM uwe. �pi.e rw�iM mrA,e .,.yy lr. WAOt�MrMwWNF� CR_Yli ONLT i ..f.�.. . abort wa rtl•e.r, Arw, www r, b tl,r rW «,,.w/wirer.. we b e••air Iw a pri ww WO w.f � WAeceN RATE WM vM- Faux r �•� � wr, n�i. s wnr w rrww� b F W.. �.0 i wrs D.In aye •+reY•. rI Aeesa6lE ,.i C\ A .pr.wrl °an° , O~•• •aiegi n. � an « rwne wNrb w r ses oww N - swww IYTr DIVE W r.m �.1eN°F.ire°F.rz Fmv"«« AT r� ureYLL •"°'•uw••1ew i.wrr' r c.e.... r,r r �....Y. r. « a+.aw « wa°�w«.•N�.r.« rr.�..e D;:."a•.wr r wrr r,.+ure. a.r a seg u eWr9)�1 mr laes ain+a w„Ye p.ne swvb, w •�i4.b rYp.0. Berne eW YMWF nM err•'wur: we Ir wrew ,b iwM�w «Nwr 9w)FWf rOrM w W4i � !et F�FiNAM Ir. LFiTO«n Y�jw�i« �•ww• M EDM „rMe+ b C'.M• p•eyw ,yUywyey,�e9c iMrew Leim w, • rt e r m rFwer,1 0. MN�wi IrwclfM i�roe� of •'�M F�h r�YKr w�w�T�� R�CIR�-.•0.�� r ww wY e. wrM �M,e r,sw,a �`wr-e��"�'�� � ILivw iM M.riva WT �w,�r rM qww erYq w�oYw ebM w YI Ms rrwl i+l Is•e. Y NrMw m r r r sr 9srww rwFs+ �4• wwrw.e rrr r Fa. w werlw wNe ems, wr rw •ww rw x awe':�r«uWy 0.wr+. nrr r� r ��+M r.r r+. r.. p,.�.une��•r a rwsw� w '�wmra ww. w rapwM w « e� YN M �e y purw� �rIY„r 4� � w w . - Q TYP. HANDICAP SIGN TW. HANDICAP SIGN r11 COLUMN GUARD SECTION s,`r.e.'++ bib- r�iL,�Y, '""�" •" jFe " `". . S"nrr�,r 1�"•br:" r"„L:,,«e .�N, iI°.°. NTS NTS HTS r �T. Cwww b Meer emw Frr rw M K M erww,. w e ".Ce•I" =r. �„ �Ir yys�.C.,,w' ,"ey,M EDC WIIM rA � wawiw M �� er�aw •x � � Twarw eM a MY, wws a rrYY 1�'�r �ye�Myw� w �ie rYV1 �. wre Taw .wwwY nw Ark ,rerL,wV,a r+ll� M o-�re•rr.• v rwgar�6Yr w.�r. NSI ern w aww. an�Ls•••� wrr r,. r r ere r re ..e r ..r u I�E w r er.r'•'i .w°•.Ni ,r'..ru"° wAtl.i ��ar. M. war..ie A M.s° L�e. aMl an «.wwr..r nrem error e.uw �i rcC'� t M male s, r Yr�A�e Wee r titer W .err ,. rwa 4 S rw••rr.•ulrw w w �b�.iww s wYana ab ,a,W www, «rte hr�Yrnwl«wMer w w� M n�ws� YYI. 1�•]bine� Ne/YlMwiarl�s � • Is Isr dry � a,`••`r�. .�+s"s elr.u..!. ri. wr.•«��:w.e N � � G r....A�n wm ea• "ew.a',.re.Ie Nam Z' m'"' r' r wIw ' Y :••':.re'.w uwemr.wM`°e`r"":.al.n w•�w a W ilii ..rte'• .... 17 6 1wwMr r.er:�+i; «rw .eiw raa rw,r�„�y,a r N sinel��w�° war rrulrira'mn�i ex Rm.m 4s1TvLeM ar° Mb..A"r4 « rMA sr. �� �G,w'^ `ew,'bA M web rbba� mAM.mL� "°"u'ww W3NFMF1f Am R�uuc DsrWM Q TYP. WHEEISTOP W SLAB Q TYP. TRAFFIC ARROW(1 COLUMN GUARD ELEVATION '•• •"°' r rr w « e.rr .a em. r „"�"s,IR rL _•. NTS NTS NTS err 00. ROm FAYW NW9L wL'14WD' Fna,p Nma a Yw,Im Areerma/ r4i w nrrM SYMBOLS & ABBREVIATIONS FA�C1r1 6MWbL6lc9C WW6TI�CALFA6 6�sf OTYleeroWet �i Wine M�MWI.t c R9L�4xW eNW11�116 F.10.ert n.9eo im euo WWNFsr9P a� bre � Ao:W 6�.AeW W:Rr�We W _ rt'�.Rs1.N4a9.o IelLawt NRMAMAL �Nex Levi u.MTF.r..M,eR wRWr 1w two 1U1rtr1 YX@ i� Mm�iB lmrMxuut frill �II� lanwR fttA M19N� IM�A)ClL WrmeeL �s,PaWW cNi cRl9aTs "W„s..ICTra ;R�`WTM6 xaF F%A�Rum .9.em '®"'i.rWYYx nRL l�7k�t€3C` By. -� LiJlning By, .... - Fliannin By STA =n=" w r Z TRT BOARDS Date t G uCi lc;z 31'rp s t PROTECT DATA V LOCATION / ADDRESS THE ADDRESS IS. SW. 7th STREET ! SW. Ise AVENUE, MIAMI, FLORIDA WITH FRONTAGE OF APROXIMABLY: 2SO FEET ON SW 7th STREET 250 FEET ON MIAMI RIVER 385 FEET ON 11t AVENUE LEGAL DESCRvnoN: LOTS 1 THRU. 5 AND THE EASTERLY 2SOM OF TRACT -A!, BLOCK 39S AND LOTS 16417, 20 AND 27, BLOCK 395, OF AMENDED MT OF BLOCK 39 SOUTH, ACCORDING TO THE MT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 42, AT PACE 6, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF MAN OADE COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND THE FAST MW FEET OF LOTS 18, AND 19, BLOCK 39S, CRY OF MIAMI ACCORDING TO THE PUT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK B AT PAGE 41, OF THE PUBUC RECORDS OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF MIM9 - DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA SITE DATA ZONING MSROCT SO -7 (CENTRAL BRICMELL RAPID TRANSIT COMERCIAL-RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT) RDW ZWE ROOD ZONE -AE- (EL. 9.00 N.G.V.D) DENSITY 20 UMTS / ACRE = 444 UMTS MAX. SITE AREA IN SWARF FEET 96,653 S.F. SITE AREA ACRES 2.22 ACNES TG NNEETT LOT AREA 96.653 S.F. ( 2.22 ACRES ) CENTER LINE OF tet, AVE.9.726 Si CENTER LINE OF 7th. ST. 6.243 SF RIVER ((ro -0) 22.569 SF PUBLIC TRANSPORT (90--0' 35,328 SF TOTAL ADDITIONAL AREA 73,666 SF TOTAL GROSS LOT AREA = 170.521 SF ( 391 ACRES ) FAIL ALLOV£0: 170.521 IF X &0 ( RESIDENTIAL) 1.023,126 SF ALLO9ED: 170.521 IF X 225 ( COMERDAL) 353,672 SF F.A.R = 1,406,796 SF AM BREAKDOWN FAL NFA Q06f MFA a OF {R415 1 PARR lEV 1 / CWMERtlAL 24.6)6 S.F. 36,63) S.F. 0 COMMEROAL AREA = 16.909 SF.) 2 WING LEVEL 2 8,252 S.F. 55.287 S.F. 3 3 ARKING LEVEL 3 5.710 S.F. 35,267 IF. 3 4 PWING LEVEL 4 7,W9 S.F. 54.699 IF. 5 5 PWING LEVEL 5 ],039 SF. 54.899 S.F. 5 6 PWING LEVEL 6 7,043 S.F. 54.699 S.F. 5 J AYENITm LEVEL 947 S.F. W.- S.F. 0 8 SIOENRAL LEVEL 8 111,739 IF. 22.483 S.F. J1 9 DENTAL LEVEL 9 15,559 SF. 17.900 S.F. 11 lO MENIAL LEVEL 10 18,739 S.F. 22"3 S.F. 31 11 TIAL LEVEL 11 15.127 SF. 1),120 S.F. 9 12 MENIAL LEVEL 12 16.739 IF. 22.488 IF. 31 13 MENIAL LEVEL 13 13.127 S.F. 17.120 SF. 9 14 90INMAL LEVEL 14 13.739 SF. 22433 SF. 31 15 MENIAL LEVEL 15 15,127 IF, 17.120 S.F. B 16 MENIAL LEVEL 16 15.739 S.F. 22."6 IF. 31 17 SDEIITIAL LEVEL 17 15127 IF. 17.120 IF. 9 18 MDUAL LEVEL 16 18.737 S.F. 22954 SF. 31 19 SIDENRAL LEVEL 19 12146 SF. 14.093 S.F. 0 20 MENIAL LEVEL 20 18,737 S.F. 22.954 IF. 31 21 WENT. LEVEL 21 12146 S.F. 14.093 S.F. 0 22 MENTAL LEVEL 2Z 1317]) SF. 22.pN S.F. 31 23 MENIAL LEVEL 23 12148 SF. 14,098 SF. 0 24 MENIAL LEVEL 24 13,737 S.F. 22954 S.F. 31 25 BDENTIAL LEVEL 25 12146 S.F. 14,098 S.F. 0 26 SIDENTIAI IEVEl 26 17.093 IF. 22954 IF. 24 27 S .1. LEVEL 27 11.376 IF. 12,235 IF, 0 28 SIOENTIAL LEVEL 23t17..-1 IF. 21,873 S.F. 24 29 MENIAL LEVEL 29 IF. 12253 30 MENIAL LEVEL 30S.F. 21.877 IF. 24 31 SDENTAL LEVEL 31SE. 12.253 SF. 0 32 MENTAL LEVEL J2SF. 21.377 &F. 24 33 SDENTAL LEVEL !3SF. 12253 S.F. 0 V. wills Y. W SMACK FRONT REQUIRED PROVIDED ESTAL: PEDir-r W -W TOWER W -T W -W REAR PEDESTAL: (AS PER CHARTER) wv SO•Aw (NEAREST POINT TO PU TOWER (AS PER CHARTER) 50'-W 50-9" MMEST POINT TO PU SIDE$ PEDESTAL EAST: (AS PER CHARTER) 30'6• W -e MEW CORRIDOR) PEDESTAL WEST. (AS PER CHARTER) 32'6" 32'4" MEW CORRIDOR) TOWER EAST:(AS PER CHARTER) 34.6• 30'4• MEW CORRIDOR) TOWER WEST: (AS PER CHARTER) 3r -r 35.3• MEW CORRIDOR) BUILDING HEIGHT MAX PROVIDED UNLIMITED 3714N.GVD. NUMBER OF STORIES 33 STORIES HEIGHT ABOVE MAIN ROOF. 29-6 PARKING DATA REQ.(ARED PARKING 443 UNITS X W SPACES / UNITS = 443 SPACES COMMERCNL SPACES • 19 SPACES TOTAL REQUIRED = 462 SPAS PROVIDED-PARK..IK, LEVEL 1 28 SPACES LEVEL 2 97 SPACES LEVEL 3 112 SPACES LEVEL 4 IV SPACES LEVEL S 117 SPACES LEVEL 6 104 SPACES TQjAL 575 SPACES (12 HANDICAP SPACES) LOADING (BASED ON 839,305 S.F. CROSS AREA) REQUIRED = (4)12 X 35 A M 12 X 55 PROVIDED W (6)12 X 35 R V L YnuKR DWgI 2W SW. 27th A- FL 33731 (305) SZ%1030 (FAX) 529.2022 - SMI CWW6Ym nepW OWYrr 00 CL ReN1rhA HK1079n p w �(r 11 0 City Clerk p _ •/ 3-26-03 JCS LOr2 vl6--r-o• 0224 03- 811 A•OOA J MW ONE ►� ��■■■�ttt/til - - - _ T ■I��Is7iGi�� �!!-f �►♦w♦ww �. ♦♦♦♦♦♦w - ►♦♦/ ♦♦w♦♦♦ ♦♦� w♦ Ww♦w� / w♦♦♦w� "�♦♦♦♦♦w1 X11■■■■■■■■, r � �—.ter ! �l�♦,'�,1►w♦w♦r" ►w�w♦♦w♦♦♦♦♦1� i ��♦♦♦f♦� �♦♦♦♦♦ww♦wwiE' �►♦�f ► w♦. ►♦ ♦ ►♦ /►♦ w ♦� ♦ ♦ ♦ w ♦♦♦ � ' I/ � R;'' I�I' .��� I� < ^ ♦♦ �� 1, !♦♦♦♦1 ;' ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ tc' �E�♦A♦ MARK,♦♦♦♦ .►�Ar►♦♦♦w♦♦♦♦♦1 I ��■■■�` Ir�.��■1♦♦♦♦ awl 3. ���A�� SAA♦1 �A�w♦�► �� v t c i� k 1; Ell t sii.�i.I ■ .. i��■�I�■1 ��w�w�w�! �i►'�iwi�iwiwiwi' - ��♦�w'w'w'♦+w�� �w�pwi►�w�w�� �ipw�,° ►; �♦iwi♦i♦i♦�� ►�� �i♦i♦i♦iwi �"i�i♦iwOi � �'i�' I■■■■■► �♦♦♦. ►♦♦wwwwl Ism �■MIN .■ME NMIf♦f♦�♦�� www♦�♦�w�w�w�rw ��♦�♦�w�♦�w�♦� �wwwt I♦♦,►♦♦�♦�♦�ww ,�w����♦�w�♦E *♦a♦awa♦i ♦�!.'I'-�i �� r r 1■ �■■� �■��w ', W � �9AAl l�i�a�i�aTiTa�i1L=K� � � � � � �II'aTiTQi9�aTi�1�w"y �r .....�i�aTaT.n^'z << _._�_.a.aZ �c .+� � � ��i� 1��1`1�■■■■1� • 1■I■■I ■■1;•;.;.;.� � �wiWi♦iwiwiwi `'!O.♦.•.♦.♦. �.00•O.•.♦. � ►'i�'.♦.♦.•.♦.E� ►w.�'1�wo•.♦.E� "•'•••0❖1 . ;ISI■■■■■■1� ��I■■!■■1 �:w:♦:w:! gip.♦.wpw.w.� ..w.♦.♦.w., .;...f,.,p. ., ►.♦.♦p.♦.w.w., ►.♦.,.♦.w.♦.♦., ..♦o.♦.♦.•1 ���►Ii�■�1■■■■■1; ♦ww♦♦♦♦ �♦♦♦♦� r-+�r.=w♦� �• 1111♦♦♦ ♦♦w♦♦♦♦ .1111♦ �►�i�� _�\,/ i■■■■I www♦. ►♦♦11111 www♦ ►.:►♦ ♦♦ ..� ►wwwwww.� ►wo♦♦ww.� �♦www♦1 ►♦�;■ .. lil■■� ■■1 ��♦�♦�♦�! •�.�w�♦�♦�♦�w�♦� �`�♦�♦�� �w�♦�♦i�p� A, ►�♦�w�♦�♦�♦����, ►�♦��r•♦�♦�♦�•!1, �♦�♦�♦�w�♦�1 ►♦�j�j � �1 �► � �, y�''1 ■■1;1♦♦♦.f �♦ww♦O♦w� �D♦� �w♦wpp♦� .w. ►�♦♦♦♦♦♦♦w�- ►�♦1�♦♦♦♦♦w�- �♦♦♦♦w1 ►♦♦�; I / �l■■■■■�I �tl www♦♦♦♦� Q, T c i A i A., i�• �♦♦www♦, ► '�� I ♦♦i♦ fi � .�wawawl .1a♦a� �♦a♦a♦a♦i �wi��� <<: 3a♦a♦a♦wR� << awa♦a♦.�!�,� << ���e: a♦a 1�■■■■■■I, � El, �9��1■1 �w0♦www ►w�w�ww� �O♦w0♦� '♦♦�♦OIII �Owww♦�� ►�Www�w♦www♦w�' ►w���♦♦ww♦♦w�' w�"♦♦♦w♦w♦♦� �� ■■■�� ry 1111 ♦♦w♦ i♦♦♦♦� ♦ww♦♦w� 1111 ►♦♦w♦♦♦t ►♦/►1111.♦♦♦♦♦ w�l[ ■ 101■■►ww♦� ►wwwl 1111♦ ►1111♦. ♦♦♦♦� ♦w♦♦♦♦♦ ♦www♦♦♦ ♦♦1111♦'YII���1/.i■■■■t 1 www♦pw� j ►♦♦w♦www/ O♦w♦w♦w♦w� Www♦♦ww♦♦w� �Ow♦OOw� �OOw♦w♦w♦w♦! ►ww��w♦w♦♦www! ♦w♦w♦www0i ►w�l Iii■■I ■■1 �:w:❖:! ;�I .000� ow.❖.•.w. �.!w.00�.•.ow.w.�,,� ►.w.w.❖.ow�l� ►.w..ow.o��►l� �•w•♦•••w•� ►w.� I�1i\�i■■■■� .♦♦♦. s♦i♦iwi♦i ,'00♦wi♦i♦iwi 4� w.wiw.Owiwiw0♦ ,►♦wiw0♦wi♦i� � ►0/►�♦iwiwiE� �♦w♦♦♦w♦w♦♦i �wi�lll ' 1 Il■■� ■■1 ....a ��:. 1 �'.'wD♦w1 111102♦w♦2♦20i �wE ,w�I `�ww�w�♦�w��; t A♦�♦�♦�♦'� t R "'��♦�♦�♦fir tc� ♦�.�♦�1 ►�iq 1■■■■■■■� w♦♦♦ w�rw♦♦w 11111♦♦♦w♦♦♦O� �+♦ � 1w♦♦♦w♦♦♦w♦♦`' ►�,►www♦www♦�.. ►.W►www♦w♦w . ►,,WIw♦w♦w♦w� .w� ■ 1■101■l■■1 �iwiwiwi!♦♦♦wwwwwwwOw/ �wOw♦w♦www♦ww� Oi �! ►w♦w♦w♦O♦♦w♦w! �OwwOw♦O♦♦�� �w♦��♦w♦ww♦♦�1 ►ww♦w♦w♦w♦j� �w� �,��I i■■■�� • ►♦w♦� ►1111111 .♦♦♦♦♦♦w �♦ ♦ www♦♦ww I1111♦♦♦ ♦w♦♦♦♦♦ ♦♦♦w 111111 �/� �� ,•♦•♦•♦•, ,•OO♦•♦•♦•♦•1 ,•p♦•w•p♦•pi y'�www! ►1.1.1.1.1.1.1! I.w.w.w.w.w.w.w� .w.�►.w.❖.•.... .w. ��b\�i■■■�� i■I■��■■1.111♦ w♦♦www♦ 1111www/..♦.II►ww♦♦ww.�I►♦♦♦♦w♦��►w♦w♦♦♦/�iii�f` ►♦ r I�Rey f w♦♦♦� '�ww♦ww♦1 �♦awawa♦a♦awaf: �a♦Di ►♦a♦a♦a♦a♦awa♦i .'sa♦a♦iwi♦a♦i♦i iwa�►♦a♦a♦a♦a� a♦_�9 �_l� ���tlt♦I�' �■■■�, i,.,�i�■1 ��♦�♦�w�.j='.''ij♦♦�j►♦w♦w♦w�.�►"��..��a�r.���.�ra��aa•�a�.-���•:���n�av�:�•��n._�ci� ■■■■ ♦�`IIP��������' � e ,I- 1 .,.: Www♦ �♦ww♦ �����■FIS■1 �a♦awD�� f y_w_w.w_I �a�1ww♦� --- — - - J 1■/I�� I,�r��,�■■1 w♦w♦w♦w� : �w��s�w�w♦p, ��%%i�%♦�i� �i � %i 1'��I-i■■■■1 1�1■■�■■1:w'w'w'• �I ��♦*w:w:w:w:w� ♦:❖:•:w:w:� ►; �� !IN �Ai■!! •www♦ i�■�■ I♦le■ ■1 wwwwww♦w.11 !wwwwwwwwwe Ef4 • 44 1111. www♦wwi♦iE�L� ■i� ■�■■■�� 111■■k ■■1 �2♦2.2♦4�E�. t� �iwww,� � ..�r� �� � 1w♦w.. ;wwt W vwwwwwl / III'�i����■�.,, 1�l�!�1.� ■■1.wiwiwiwi ►O♦wiwiwiwi/ �wiwiwiwiwiwi� ! / 1�'��� ���■11�iiirli�l i?i!i!i!i!i!i i!i!i!i!i?i?i� "'�,��' � 0 q������ 1■■c■■■■:631�1i0■Z■�■■0■0=■■■■:�c■' ��Il��i■■tii�l�re9�■■■■■C :w■O®Ce��,,.•`��♦�e♦��ME 51 4 hS �e�����'� C '` LUt O I �I I • 31 PARKING SPACES s l aa111 ' ^ � I 56'-!' 73 0• 3D'-3' 33'-O' � 63'-P Y Q'-0• R'-®' � '�' Oa 1 � I I I I ���MIAMI RIVER W; s w s fll------------- e e I 3 [ I � - 33'-P D' -P 70.7' - 79'-C - B' -i• D' -b' D'-6• r � [d a .z I _ ( l ig � D 1• B b• B b• D3' I � Q i �s I Jur I i i �ai:G'S _ o o t Q" �o - I --- -- ------ rzls ETal -. - -- --- -- -- - - �l.?P Daae — I I ) D' -D• 3RBG 9E DY '°Y ;T ° �,. a ' L yr I o Date CIT •.4.—.—_—.—. .—s,—.—.—. _——.—.—.—.—.—.—.—.— — OF F041'11110NfIE—L— — — — — — — -- — — — — — — -- — — —.— — I —.—.—.— _.—.—.—.—.—.—.—.—.+ I\ "'PS ------ -- - -- -- -�- --- - - LLL-� S. W.- - IsT. AVENUE— - ������� c���=•:� '^"`T r m'BELLER mg LII • fsj.w Lv L ;ipey j ppproVaj (P.B.1008. PG. 45U - I � EA_MENT 317-03 e' WIRE FENCErON RW LINE) I J C . x' — 1„ ' € , •g •,,.3 uEST RAIL LIW SIRLU \\ III ! METRO RAIL OVERHE? STRUCTUfE LEVEL 1 E / 0224 I I � SCALE 1' - 16-0'G� _ J 47 - ^— - R V L AId6leco.e m I zm I II �6 UM ��= Gt ` --o� Sr.l I "n\ 6 • t ` , Ja • 1 i J� • P t J° • JB V�� FL ' r • r : s s L_----II'��-' c �, PROMTY M L -32V -V d o 1 Is I I I3'�' N'-6• N' -P -B. e'-6' e'i' 5' -U• -T 11'-0 1'-b' Q' -T n' -m' m'- -i I -'h 701 — W DW4 I i I ti l Lk o. Re—h MJ Bolavn B 1 LUt O I �I I • 31 PARKING SPACES s l aa111 ' ^ � I 56'-!' 73 0• 3D'-3' 33'-O' � 63'-P Y Q'-0• R'-®' � '�' Oa 1 � I I I I ���MIAMI RIVER W; s w s fll------------- e e I 3 [ I � - 33'-P D' -P 70.7' - 79'-C - B' -i• D' -b' D'-6• r � [d a .z I _ ( l ig � D 1• B b• B b• D3' I � Q i �s I Jur I i i �ai:G'S _ o o t Q" �o - I --- -- ------ rzls ETal -. - -- --- -- -- - - �l.?P Daae — I I ) D' -D• 3RBG 9E DY '°Y ;T ° �,. a ' L yr I o Date CIT •.4.—.—_—.—. .—s,—.—.—. _——.—.—.—.—.—.—.—.— — OF F041'11110NfIE—L— — — — — — — -- — — — — — — -- — — —.— — I —.—.—.— _.—.—.—.—.—.—.—.—.+ I\ "'PS ------ -- - -- -- -�- --- - - LLL-� S. W.- - IsT. AVENUE— - ������� c���=•:� '^"`T r m'BELLER mg LII • fsj.w Lv L ;ipey j ppproVaj (P.B.1008. PG. 45U - I � EA_MENT 317-03 e' WIRE FENCErON RW LINE) I J C . x' — 1„ ' € , •g •,,.3 uEST RAIL LIW SIRLU \\ III ! METRO RAIL OVERHE? STRUCTUfE LEVEL 1 E / 0224 I I � SCALE 1' - 16-0'G� _ J -R V. L a �O \ 7560 S.W.Dth A. AAfni ci 1�N DOS)SA7071 R / >- — — — I I PROPERTY UNE WNW �� �` 2 I Y R I awacE a aleEA —I cue >r.Aw rre� rar«con t t R R t • P - _.. 1 a Uw CL C/) • ♦ 97 PAOQNG SPACES /? P N cn o I t t t i D 0 i t 0 I D UMTCL I 0 UNIT CL o o W I �MIAMI RIVER W b� m rn a t s4 § � R 1 1 � A � �-•� �� �' � p Z — � � 1 i -v3 Q a I I r � "° �► �" � I I m w — i R I I-.- -- –i o0o eoo __ o°e °oo 000 "°"' _ __,_. _ __�� _._1_ ,�..•�r"01AM1 RETAL RESDEM J I I I U l ,.a,� Itx . �irF �+..Lff�F 9P Yi a1RKPJG WY/Ew_._._._.—._ .—PARIQJ.—---------------------I_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ /1 e•.a•rafw xm.+a .•aM• a.F 0 P I PROPERTY UNE L-385'.10' OCiCS �� E_�. I i- wte — GITT OF HIAHI HONW —LINE A — — I I - -- - S. W: - IsT. AVENUE— - -- ---- --- - - - - - -- _ - - - - I o I I i m' SEWER— (DBJVM, FG451) L EA5BIE"T___ _ _ _____ By y •i /1j!L re i.L L+:V .. 1,EV :'... ..!!! ?titply approval eWARE FENOEfON RAU LME) WEST RN1 LINE I 3-26-03 N JCS m N I i _... _ W - ------------------------ --- LEV_EL.-�__� — — — — — — — — — — — — 71 SCALE 1 - 16'-0' vlb •I -o' RETRO RAIL O�ERMEAD SnaZTURE D ) {� 0224 ` 81, PROPERLY UNE 1-324'•7 TI 2 1 _ Z ,p.BN 1 �n a e.E� m R ._._._._._._.__.—._._.—._.—.—._._.—.—.—._,—.—.—. F'ARKNC — — — _ E:SDH�li — _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -PARKP , — _I—. c I a ENTRY/EXIT l PROPERLY UNE LJBS'•10' I I 11 CITY OF MIAMI MO"JIENT L6ff I - - S. W.- -IST. AVENUE— - - - - - _ -- -- - - I _ __ ° n I� 10.6EILER---------------�-- m SEMENT (DB.1®ee, M 451) �� m L—EA--------------------- I 8' WIRE FENC 11.. LINE) ` P LLES7 RN)LINE I (J Z 0 w u w 0 By: R V L ARNWb- ar 3W SW. M Aro A9aN R 3TW sd OM 7, L: Q I ODOM 11 3Q mo W .ME s f�.wa E IPUNNC sn II ...I ..., City Clerk mm MEN ow Iowa Mom ION: a.■a _ !� ■ 0� IT _ _ _ 1141, ME 11 on oil R ._._._._._._.__.—._._.—._.—.—._._.—.—.—._,—.—.—. F'ARKNC — — — _ E:SDH�li — _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -PARKP , — _I—. c I a ENTRY/EXIT l PROPERLY UNE LJBS'•10' I I 11 CITY OF MIAMI MO"JIENT L6ff I - - S. W.- -IST. AVENUE— - - - - - _ -- -- - - I _ __ ° n I� 10.6EILER---------------�-- m SEMENT (DB.1®ee, M 451) �� m L—EA--------------------- I 8' WIRE FENC 11.. LINE) ` P LLES7 RN)LINE I (J Z 0 w u w 0 By: R V L ARNWb- ar 3W SW. M Aro A9aN R 3TW sd OM 7, L: Q I ODOM 11 q ur m��� OARD S Ej Zi /y��� /�(— METRO RAIL OVERHEAD STRICTURE^`} LIQ EVELV J l w I SCALES P - 16'-0' 0224 A-3 03- 811 3Q mo W s f�.wa E IPUNNC sn g. City Clerk q ur m��� OARD S Ej Zi /y��� /�(— METRO RAIL OVERHEAD STRICTURE^`} LIQ EVELV J l w I SCALES P - 16'-0' 0224 A-3 03- 811 I i I II I i i I i goy �t z — — I PROPERTY UNE LJM'A' �----- ---- r I � o ro II s i SERVYf eaRaNb 4I.3 i \ 7�%` � � D n R I I 3oo'4AM m I I o00 000 00o eoo °oe oee o°o �`ti�, L, V il 1 11 H" 71 NIT CL In .� �1 �a� , _� I p p p e p a —rNju I p " CA CD I p tt p �t pp it p tt pp tt UW p p p p p I UNIT CL I �� � MIAMI RIVER m El t, p o I •o - r ��� 3 p . !t I p ♦ ID PARKPIG SPACES P I� G I i I M UNrl i �A RR I I o00 000 0o eoo ooe oo ti�t I 1 I� . - - - - - - x _ _ _ 1 _ 3C -i• VHI CORRDOR ° PPAWNG ETAL RESR� 44 �AmCN—_ _ _ _ _ _ _ ----------- _ -- /Es — .ENTRY/EW ' PROPERTY LINE L=385'.10" Cltt OF HIAMI MONII'IENT LINE I tL - --q— S. W.- -IST.—AVENUE - — - - - - - - a By: ID 5EWER m I I S' URE FENOE(ON R.W LME) u.EST RAU LIME a i METRO RAIL OVfRI*AD STRIOTURE LEVEL 4 >< i9 SCALE= 1' - 16'-0' )1 s3 P� BWsw.m mwnt R 13113 535.= :r OxWp lie O. Reuldu OOm97S B I'A 3-26-03 JCS l_02 I/16'•1' -O' 0224 A-4 03— 811 J LU vubrn'ile ;,,no the oublsc CD C,o,, , .a ? ,, ' r, t Kom Q� � a' �" R r0 R AR®: YJ i B I'A 3-26-03 JCS l_02 I/16'•1' -O' 0224 A-4 03— 811 J RSV L AfA 7%U SW. 7Th A- X I T) ALn� R � _ — — PROPERTY UNE laTt4'•9" Q I � IFE a e 7`�� �Z I I �•-Ir 3mm•-4• — — — — — — — _ 31'-C N&I COICpGOR O ooe ooe eoo °oe °oe o°0 000 i ��y�� Doh UNIT (1 \ � � w 4- o0am CD NJ a p l �� �� � I I p p p p p •� pp Ip 1 a "U, UNIT CL FE^18°"t..i`S;6y p p p p p p UNIT a ► �' i MIAMI RIVER m rnl s p � 54 dg ( p ♦ I p 117 PARKING SPACESp _ �* I UNIT G UIAT o 0 o e o o e o 0 o e — — — . _ . 1 . _ w• -v .->Bu Come" n -------------.-_ PETAL —_-_-- ___.___-_--__. ----__I __--- L.Lt PAPAL RESIDENT _ . AARKp G. — — — I _ )� d ra J_ • E3JTRY/EXIT o ( o PROPERTY UNE L=385.10" I 1 w I L. '�,vw' VITT 1111011tlRk➢'IENT LINE — -.- -.- - .-.- - - _ - - -.- - - - -.- - _ �.1.}.-.-._ -.- - - - - -.- - -.- - - .- - - - - - - - - - - _.- - - - - -.- -.- - - - - - - - - - - - - -.- - _ - - - _ - - -- — — i'aa,.i v -� S. W. IsT. AVENUE-- — — — — — I r BY 1- -------------- 09LLER EA5EHENT -------------- \( 3-26-03 - B' WIRE PENCE(ON RNI LINE) (LEST RNI LINE T \ L []Q m I/16' -I' -O• I w � P - --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0224 �- METRO RAIL OVERHEAD 5T210T0RE LEVEL 5 SCALE: T- 16'-0' ) O Q �03— 811 I � � Z ' I I a ' PROPERTY UNE L=32,'•9' FLTPAW _ Z 3M'-4- o f �'- m's^vEu caaa0ae O o 0 0o e°o ooe ooe 000 000 \ <<ti�� D�' 3 I 3 ♦ �a ♦ I uNrra Z I F I � LU U) I co El 0 FF C.n mc too „N_Ra i i lk II UNIT CIL wMIAMI RIVER W rn I ----------40 PARKING o UNR C +U G I. �•� I I I II p m _.: r4_9:E ._ pfZ f.,,� KETAL RESIDENT I a.�J. �-- -- a- -- — - - - ------- - - — - -— - EY -_- P - - - ---- - - — —�- ------ ----- -- 1 c.. SMYADOT G '. T-4 PROPERTY UNE L=385'40' I I I 11 CITY cFniani nOvun I — — — — — — — - - - -r - --- -- -- -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - _- -- = -- - -------- -— -}— - - S. W.- -IST. AVENUE— - I � . -----�-- I uv4 ry � r 10, SELLER (O_ _ _ _ _ — _ _ _ _ I � m a � va✓ ` •• E } C•;7 >"NP !��'i•.:'�4�j B.10W, PC., 451) L EASE1'ENT------------------ J y ll( 3-26-03 B• uSRe error+ Rnu uraEi uEsr Rall L u -g I;I�\ W JCS _•. o � METRO RAIL OVERFEAD STRICTURE 0224 / LEVEL 6 \7 SCALE:1' -16'-0' 14 0jj L MAR yrs 2550 SW. M Aft R 33W 0_= (wiyb swa " � h5 a ltl dh J] rc c. , Y a OARDIC QUAL PPRKNG 1 CITY OF MIAMI MCN."ENT LINE ------------------------ ---4-- S. W.- - I ST .--------- AV E N U a' WRE PENCE(oN RM LINE) �-- � uEsr Rw LINE I P I U METRO RAIL OVER AD 5TRIC71.RE n RESENT ENTRY/EXIT PROPERTY UNE L:385'-10' II R V L v,; Md+[amu t D Pubo I*' mh I � auw 6osn= �N Sw................................._... o �.. .ti� � 7 � ~ L ty D0 rn 70 ?z W ft). ow. XT J Q s �MIAMI RIVER W mf ` a3 brnitted Into the public 1 it rn PZ 5 y @ ; Iola A d uty clerk 1 OARDS'�'� � l0•-b'YIDII GCRlmLR � 1 + LYi6i� R / �� /tel• R S '�' c ZA --� l W �' y �i I. -- FG. 4517 ( 10'5ELLER f11� DB.1056, 111111 EASEI'IENi`, gy; _ .•� --' i__ _ -- v guts `L 4�:r v ,.l.Yi proval € W HP/JCS 1J\ F� Ems LEVEL 7 '��l LL 0224 SCALE:1' -16'-0' vf� 811 O CID E —I QUAL PPRKNG 1 CITY OF MIAMI MCN."ENT LINE ------------------------ ---4-- S. W.- - I ST .--------- AV E N U a' WRE PENCE(oN RM LINE) �-- � uEsr Rw LINE I P I U METRO RAIL OVER AD 5TRIC71.RE n RESENT ENTRY/EXIT PROPERTY UNE L:385'-10' II R V L v,; Md+[amu t D Pubo I*' mh I � auw 6osn= �N Sw................................._... o �.. .ti� � 7 � ~ L ty D0 rn 70 ?z W ft). ow. XT J Q s �MIAMI RIVER W mf ` a3 brnitted Into the public 1 it rn PZ 5 y @ ; Iola A d uty clerk 1 OARDS'�'� � l0•-b'YIDII GCRlmLR � 1 + LYi6i� R / �� /tel• R S '�' c ZA --� l W �' y �i I. -- FG. 4517 ( 10'5ELLER f11� DB.1056, 111111 EASEI'IENi`, gy; _ .•� --' i__ _ -- v guts `L 4�:r v ,.l.Yi proval € W HP/JCS 1J\ F� Ems LEVEL 7 '��l LL 0224 SCALE:1' -16'-0' vf� 811 1 Il RRvL MAR II I I y MO SW. DTA, i o d� Fl. UM 1 II 9�N A past 52911 \\ FA4 sa-M ^ _ I I r2orExn urs L_324• -r I m AREA II 20 �i 77 UNIT A I \ J i W ulb a K—ln 00079R e . rUNIT B P uNlr A 1 a �$ — I I e• TUNIT B I = I i UfffA I e - TGN T B 12 \ I MIAMI RIVER W �„ o e• ^ a rn I iUNfT B I l UNIT A UNfT A UNIT A UNIT A UNIT A' I �.r `✓iey��3"K e - �z 4 UNIT G a IQ i I r UNR G t I � A Z Y 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1` \ L UNITB"', i UNR 8 tR•BT BSI1 i UNR- B UNIT BSI i UNf(B UNR BSI1 i UNff B UMT B,, i UNff UNIT BSI II J a I 1 - - f 1 I �$ xs-v�wewanae ,� I PETAL bT-d• RESDFsfT 4{' �TYiE7_ . _ . _ . _ . _ _ B•ffRY/EX. I_T _ _ . — _ _ . _ _ . _ . _ . _ . _ . _ _ . _ i _ . _ . _ . _ _ . _ . _ I_ _ . _ . — . _ II _ _ 1\� / PROPERTY UNE i=3asaVa—_--_--____—____ —__—____ �. ooll jr CITY OfniAnl MONJISOLINE _ _ _ — — — — _ -- -- — ------ -- — — — — I — _ ----- —S. W.- — IST. AVENUE— — —------- I I — SEDER e0B.10". PG. 4511 \) m pp L EANT i I SEnE— _ _ _ — — — — — `� yl i f:a 4 t'. uuL . v L;v ✓t I zp—roval e' wIRE r•ENcecoN R/W uNEI I 3 26-03 wesT RAU LIIJ< JCS P p W ... ._. x... � a,.3xa<.fa-M,.K•. 3dN. Xc.Ni'�! �' — -- —-------—--------- —---------- — ------------ --- L02 D lig'-r-o' METRO RAIL OVER-EAD STRUCTURE LEVEL 8 II SCALE; P - 16'-0' 0224 14-E 811 J ^� II R V L U ra:3 I Yteia D.* �t I I I Im" a R 7;717 N.6 00 asmno Lil s-0' PROPERTY LME L=32x-9' � - - - - - -- If3 , \ ZZ I) II 1 �ERVIGE B1RYY2 y A1EA br- 5' 70 CF UNIT A I \ � cn I m i I " \ J 1 I UNIT A a I O= UMTA - ¢ zi - public b91 I )MIAMI RIVER W1 }.i T ilh 'aVF UNIT A UMT A UNIT A UNIT A UNIT K 3 p• Uek (1 BOARDS =FT LU_ _ _ _- 1 f-• a .� _x, .. 63 I � �r-e• RESIDENrY1 11 "' I �� I riw.�cEmnac F �;^ di•: its I --------—-- - - - ---------- - ------ _ -_--- ENTRTIEXIT I PROPERTY UNE L=385'•W" GITT OF MIAMIYIONItIENT UNE. _._ _ _ _ _.— — _._ _ _.—.—._.— _.—._ — I _.—.—._._._--. -�- — — — — — --- — — — — — — — — — — — — �._ _._ _ _ — _ _ — —1— — — _ — — _ _ — — _ — _ —._.—. — _ _ _ - �-- - - .- - IST. AVENUE-- - - S. W -� S I --------- I 10 SEWER (DE1088, PG. 651) I lJ YO V EASB7FPR __________________ I 8' WIPM FENCECON RAL LME/ ::.'_ .....+si' .0 a.c.• I HEST RNl LRE 1a I W I 5 --._._._.- -. . - - - - - -- --------- - - -- - - - - ----- - -- ------ - - --- - - -- - � L_OR - - - / V16224 �- I-IETRO RAIL OVEWIEAD 5TRI1GTIlRE LEVEL 9 I> � SCALE; 1' - 16'0' ) A-9' - 9 03- z 0 LU —1 R V L WR Ajd*.m. S.W.. m Me FL 3M M n% ma 0:0 S29-= 11 -= sw Lw a K.-kjF MOM i I ,i.,j;�y approval bmitted Into the public t ord Priscifla A.'T.' �Im�Eon City Clerk • PAN A M I JCS �7"'NG BOARDS CD r_? ,i.,j;�y approval 3-26-03 JCS CD r_? 1/16'-1'-0' (D224 A-10 03- 811 I I I 1 2 I PROPERTY UNE L=324 -T Z — - I 17 I IN ertwwcE uaa eo•r \l r D -M y ° '— — — —Y-- — — —•—�---- —�\ +---- T�ry� D�13r-c Neu ccwimcR cn I U"R A � I e In UPS A a I N- -I I 9cn I I 3 O I E41 A I I c IS I � � UNIT A' iI `�-r I MIAMI 121VER M —� UNIT A LMA UNR A UNIT A UNIT K $a _ F= I e LM E I * I I B B B Ii B B UW E •�. I TiI111Y E3JERyzo , (� PROPERTY UNE L=38.F.to' — I i I Y. clrcFnlanlnougNTLrt�E -- — — —— --— — — —— —— — -- —— — —. -- —. -- --�- - - -� S. W.- -IST. AVENUE—Li - lD — H.YDBB, PG. 451)— — — — — _ l O L EA9FMENT — — — — I /1 B' WI(� FENCEfCN RAu LINE) WEST RN! LINE 1 s I m -- ----- - -- -- - - - ---- - ----�FIETRORA�OVERFIEADO(ElCTI1RE — - - - - ----- -LEVELS 11 ,13,15,17 � I " I 9 SCALE: r 16'-0• ) L 0 Lu J ui R V L MAR ' a �w oar .QA. mwm R 04 A ;; :v 7 DWI— L11. a R—ow doom IW 3-26-03 JCS CD P;2 V16 -•I' -O' 0//224 A-11 e i� a@ a 4' �d� I R fay. v�ti*.3i 6 T �i,.• i.,y.,xeia j pa City Clerk a 3 eu IW 3-26-03 JCS CD P;2 V16 -•I' -O' 0//224 A-11 e i� i II _ o- r ri { . I ra o I "' I lERYICE IXIRAVCE u b i b N ti �f� Z FL >? r PROPERTY ZINE L_324'•Y m AMA a IRAtl! W.S. I ASI \�\7%1Ay� uNrr c Z 1 � _____ _____ ____ ______ UNIT C UNIT C UNIT C UNIT C UNIT C UNIT C UNIE C UNIT Ca r 1 UNfi"Q ?— aa•e• vm �aRemort fl ss o• o i I IQ I / — --- — — — — — — — ----- — — — — — — RETAIL — _ —X77-8`— — RESOBJi— ---- ----- ----I a —— --- ----- .—.— 1 G. ... I— — - —— — — — - F1T{ZY I EMRY/EXIT I I w I I (1 L AW a I b — � P PROPERtt LINE L-385.70' �l by: - OITT6MIMII MONU'IENT LINE �– – – – – _ --- – –._._.--- _.--- ._.----- I - -�— — - - - S. W.- - IST. AVENUE— - - I I_:. ------------------- rDJ5JOB5,� PG. 4511 (J v EASEMwT I-------------------- I I s' wRE rfNCE(a4 RAU LP,E) WEST RM UNE 1 \ U – — � �€DIEL-x-18,-20,2224 m SCALE: 1' -16'-0' > ) E I METRO RAIL OVEWEAD 5TRlCTJRE. -------------------------------------- . _ _ 7FC � I LJ. Z 0 w J Q U W R V L , a r _ o- r ri { . �" z �--' � � �g _•.� w VsL 0 m; •' 03 c�i ►.. dUNrr .�. a ►�� fo7► w� S�, r-1 rl ►O � ►� o I, • � ii 1 I wMIAMRIVEX —.00i4IN3D�i't�i'i�i�i•�'•`i`i'N200�i` �i�o_�' I! � I1ell NO*�i�i' INII�� INi. ^ r � ` ,I ���"��� � 1111 � �1 1 — — �' 7 � ��-.. n: B n'lr; • .� r.1► -�tnl.�O_]�:.. ���l ul.G_�'� �. 1 -JIL...�p�lo lrs__�.�,�p'�Iollos J IJ I�\i �I_; .�❑ \ 0, '� - -. .y. ��O �,A+ r� ..�. n. .:a. ��r.�: 7... r� .: 7.t �. [i IOC:► oJOC►. ,�I� .;i' 1 — I r_W _ ra _. _ �� rr rl �-[ r=te L 3: �-7 ► .'', ► ' ► \c i��� i n G�■� r� - u �����' ���� n nn nn _ nn _ _____ _____ ____ ______ UNIT C UNIT C UNIT C UNIT C UNIT C UNIT C UNIE C UNIT Ca r 1 UNfi"Q ?— aa•e• vm �aRemort fl ss o• o i I IQ I / — --- — — — — — — — ----- — — — — — — RETAIL — _ —X77-8`— — RESOBJi— ---- ----- ----I a —— --- ----- .—.— 1 G. ... I— — - —— — — — - F1T{ZY I EMRY/EXIT I I w I I (1 L AW a I b — � P PROPERtt LINE L-385.70' �l by: - OITT6MIMII MONU'IENT LINE �– – – – – _ --- – –._._.--- _.--- ._.----- I - -�— — - - - S. W.- - IST. AVENUE— - - I I_:. ------------------- rDJ5JOB5,� PG. 4511 (J v EASEMwT I-------------------- I I s' wRE rfNCE(a4 RAU LP,E) WEST RM UNE 1 \ U – — � �€DIEL-x-18,-20,2224 m SCALE: 1' -16'-0' > ) E I METRO RAIL OVEWEAD 5TRlCTJRE. -------------------------------------- . _ _ 7FC � I LJ. Z 0 w J Q U W R V L , a r _ o- r ri { . �" z �--' � � �g _•.� w VsL 0 m; City Cleric 03-26-03 W acs/oj LOF2 1/16•-1'-O' 0224 A®ij2 03- 811 Is E: �-I �_. .. sum fo - 2 PROPERTY LINE L_324'A" t Z 1RAYt CD I _` NdaA •e -A• ^7 b D � - - - - - - - -----\--I-- -- uNR c uN(f c uNR c uwrc _ 1 urxr c s I I 6 .�;IInIE� Q 4: L 0 W J Q R V L ArtleaRue � .. E 25W S.W. M Aw 0051 smi m 6A4 529.202 � sd G ha.a i� lie 0. K 0007972 PROPERTY LWE L-385'40' I .. —.——.—.—.—.—.---._ _ _ _ _ — — — _ _ — — — — — QTY Gf HIAHI HCMl7ENT LME �— — — — — — — — —— �- -r— - S. W. - IST.--- - -AVENUE— - - _ _ _ _ I� I --------------- I� of ' I0 SELLER r- L EASEHENi — — — ![JB.I080, FG. 450 — — — — II N a' -1. FENGE(ON RAiI LHE7 WEST RAU LME / N ----------------- -L-EVELS 19-21,23,925 METRO RAIL OVERHEM STRUCTURE SCALES r - 16-0- Iw m 3-26-03 JC -S JC2 I/16'•1' -O' 0224 ap proval 811 �_. .. sum fo - -' 1 � r�4Z4�A�i.�1N.f���.��i��16��J����i�,L��.I����al��__ _ � �� • A���� ._�o �I\ ii tslia7i... „tslla7l ��lts,� � c2 -fill C',. �/ Ii 11 YI � •� � dol Icl i lolt�lol � � Io1� .5_� lol� lol ..::. (oh � _1 �'c . •� � ��t� �;a1��1�1 ,I •�� �� � t . �a� -- ; ___ � . PROPERTY LWE L-385'40' I .. —.——.—.—.—.—.---._ _ _ _ _ — — — _ _ — — — — — QTY Gf HIAHI HCMl7ENT LME �— — — — — — — — —— �- -r— - S. W. - IST.--- - -AVENUE— - - _ _ _ _ I� I --------------- I� of ' I0 SELLER r- L EASEHENi — — — ![JB.I080, FG. 450 — — — — II N a' -1. FENGE(ON RAiI LHE7 WEST RAU LME / N ----------------- -L-EVELS 19-21,23,925 METRO RAIL OVERHEM STRUCTURE SCALES r - 16-0- Iw m 3-26-03 JC -S JC2 I/16'•1' -O' 0224 ap proval 811 ^— II R V L i♦ [�I7II � ��t, I t �.�. tl S 'coil Ad*ed- 14AA, r GITT OF I'-- l'10NJ'IE—IT LINE — — ——.—.—.—.—.—.—.—.—.—.— ——.—.—.—.—.— —.—.—.—.— iffl - - - �-- — 750 SW. L'th Ave IST. AVENUE-- �►�i�.*�►�►�ai�►�i�s�il►��.��►�s��t•���i�ili�����i�L�i���a��JJ��� �` � qi�l i � � I ►�*�.�►�..�L=►�.�►w• -� F< ---------------y-- r 10' SEDER m 1 m 03-26-03 n' 6a0 a .DBI PG. 451) EASEHEM - (� 3 HP/JCS O V --�7C,JIIL•:.�GI� B■■ sw I i I ■9 01 Icl� : lI1. rlsN GGA` rA-jr :`_�7C.a l.,. i��� /\I ► LE 'TEST L ww ME SCALE P - 16'-0' VIb'-I'-O' ' —�► ��— �L�---- �� n - n a— i �O► HN ;9 L� •.ao,vvlc• • �O ►il ' C, �cI olol \�G, el �o� �cII ooC• 1�1 G' ..^o a,il� �rf' :^lol � J 1 - -.-.--.-.-.-.-.-.-.-._.-.-.- -.-.--.-.-.- -.-.- y ol^ ..� nc n +♦ R\ — FL PROPERTY UNE L gwV L 811 1 � I 3Y'-5. neaw sEav� onRars s awn 5, 5' sr•e' I `u m — — — - 0 UP9f D' cn Em I UNIT D2 _ 0I J Ut f D2 am 00 "P K UMf V 9 0 N- . -77 rj UNIT D' i o UtS D2 _. . a� i♦ [�I7II � ��t, I �.�. tl S 'coil F.,I — GITT OF I'-- l'10NJ'IE—IT LINE — — ——.—.—.—.—.—.—.—.—.—.— ——.—.—.—.—.— —.—.—.—.— iffl - - - �-- — - - -(T--S. W.- IST. AVENUE-- �►�i�.*�►�►�ai�►�i�s�il►��.��►�s��t•���i�ili�����i�L�i���a��JJ��� �` � qi�l i � � I ►�*�.�►�..�L=►�.�►w• -� ---------------y-- r 10' SEDER m 1 m 03-26-03 .DBI PG. 451) EASEHEM - (� 3 HP/JCS V --�7C,JIIL•:.�GI� B■■ I LOR i I ■9 01 Icl� : lI1. rlsN GGA` rA-jr :`_�7C.a l.,. i��� /\I ► LE 'TEST L ww ME SCALE P - 16'-0' VIb'-I'-O' ' —�► ��— �L�---- �� n - n a— i �O► HN ;9 L� •.ao,vvlc• • �O ►il ' C, �cI olol \�G, el �o� �cII ooC• 1�1 G' ..^o a,il� �rf' :^lol � J 1 - -.-.--.-.-.-.-.-.-.-._.-.-.- -.-.--.-.-.- -.-.- y ol^ ..� nc n +♦ R\ 811 I y approval F.,I — GITT OF I'-- l'10NJ'IE—IT LINE — — ——.—.—.—.—.—.—.—.—.—.— ——.—.—.—.—.— —.—.—.—.— - - - �-- — - - -(T--S. W.- IST. AVENUE-- ---------------y-- r 10' SEDER m 1 m 03-26-03 .DBI PG. 451) EASEHEM - (� 3 HP/JCS I LOR i I s' wrlE rENce�oN ww uNEi(� LE 'TEST L ww ME SCALE P - 16'-0' VIb'-I'-O' 0224 - -.-.--.-.-.-.-.-.-.-._.-.-.- -.-.--.-.-.- -.-.- y R\ 811 � -- - ' . ' | � | ��=°�' PROPERTY LINE L=324! -r m 7 701p Un 01 R�Su cn ct CIO 1.2 City Clerk uj ROARDS EE PROPERTY LINE L=385'.V T: LF 7 / � __ _ ___ _ _ _ _ - -'oc----- - - - - - - - ----- -- --- - - - - - ----- - - - - -- - - -- --- �-------- -------7--------- ---- ------`e��� vv - |u| ------ �4Y[|vU[--------��-------------------- �M -- | | / o, � Cm � / | U � | | ` . 8 03-26-03� `-��=���=°�� ~-��~°�� / UJ �puos � ` _ _--____--_--___-_------_ _�__�� LEVEL_ | ^ �="~L,�,E�==,�. `^»' ao��s r^�*' 0224 .. ( , . . V , I ( I I 9"v, IN ZJ PROPERTY LINE w241•91 �� Z r I J I ° w a I I \ I Y v ams a naw Isnavr� eaRaN� � a� 5m• -n• � �� (� � a -- - - 7 x i UMT D 1 uNrr In B R V L 2M S.W. zft Me ^ UM LL /] HE iI - UWEr D2 I \ d I N 1 AB uNn D I , LMT D O Cz I � a /1 /1�MIAMI RIVER_, m i 3 I UNIT F uuu I l l n B T -UNIT B m UtBf D2 WED2 nD2 UMf D2 UNIT IF - B ' L_UNIT B OAR® S UNIVE as UNrr D UNIT D UNIT D UNIT D u UPJI(B yhg 6 U4. vm� I KETAL RESIDENT15 —I — — ------ — --- —— — — — — — — PAWING, — —— — — —PI6 —PARK — --- -- --- — — --- --- ...... — — — — -- — _ -- ) by r �Em« ir'9 ,` I 211 I 4 ' a ENTRY/EXIT 1 ...I �.ap ® PROPERTY LINE WV -10'I I a j• �y` �. ue'...'.,..w'•i: .•�.. L.i.; •s;'•s.. "� iii.. y Mro�i6l 1 w GIY OF MIN`w'4� I1 MOMMENT LINE ' I bmitl+ed into the public —.—.�.—.—.—._.—.—.-.—._.—.—.—.—.—.— _` �N � Y. ^a. W .«.p V p •y -e,•1 '1't'. - - S. W.- - IST. AVENUE— - - - - - - + J d^L c �!h$ .0 1 � g9G4 r a' ET -------------- 10- — — im•SELLER Pris 9b_G_... -•:. ..... t_ „nl' (DEJOW,P.451) IL M--------------- -- y i s Clerk Jerk 03-26-03 �et WIRE FENCE(ONRLINEI `4 I us5t RAIZ LME j w _ICS L_0�2 N --- --- ---------- - - - --- - -- X70 LEVELS 28,30,32- - - METRO RAIL OVERHEAD 5TRUCTURE ^ VIb'-I24 SCALE P - 16'-0' , 1 I ) LCL I 0224 I II () 03- 811 J f TI FL PROPERTY UNE W24 -r \'l� ��---- - - - - o I \ I ro� 2I tin 7iEi\I \�� 71D R V L ArtlitlNla Q = op . 276 An Awns R = ^ t ) mino W "*° hk 0. It DDOM2f J 1 ill 14 Al W e' ca ao 0o ca UN F I Y <y I B NIT UNIT E' .7• - I ( - !7. y -i RE7AL QESD PARMG ENT — — —.—.—.—.—._.—.—._.—.—.—.—'--- — — TC.I`�TFn — W- PARK--—'—.--- .--- ---'——.—.--- .—I—.—.—.—.A PL .—.—. _.— ' ENTRY/EMT I ` I a PROPERTY UNE L --38V-10' BY:— i I CIT T OF MIAMI HLl4MENT LME I n ------ - - - I - - i - - S. W.- - IST. AVENUE— - - - - - - — 10 SEWER 1 m 3� L EASEPENT — — — (D8.1056, PG. 45V I I ` Ia'.R 1E..10rRwLMEI UESTRMLIN E LEVELS 29,31,33 a SCALE: r - 161-0 �y — —. —.— — — ——.—.—._.—.——.—.—.--- — ——.—.—.--- ——._.—.—.—.—.—.—.—.——.—.—.—.—.— — — — — — — — — — — - 6 I) EO y FIETRO RAIL CVERNE4D STRXTURE omitted Into the r cord in ccnne - m z. -t cr 't 17 03 Priscilla A. I iha y cr City Clerk F LL w� 5 .1/ MWER Lu u r m�� t:3y approval 03-26-03 W I JCS L CD V16' -I' -O' LL 0224 a -I 03— 811 C/) I \ i p I I A 2 _ N I cn o a - ' C I 2 I 8 9 = I I ^-. UNIT F1400 I )MIAMI RIVER rn -UNIT B .. F kit g f R V L ArtlitlNla Q = op . 276 An Awns R = ^ t ) mino W "*° hk 0. It DDOM2f J 1 ill 14 Al W e' ca ao 0o ca UN F I Y <y I B NIT UNIT E' .7• - I ( - !7. y -i RE7AL QESD PARMG ENT — — —.—.—.—.—._.—.—._.—.—.—.—'--- — — TC.I`�TFn — W- PARK--—'—.--- .--- ---'——.—.--- .—I—.—.—.—.A PL .—.—. _.— ' ENTRY/EMT I ` I a PROPERTY UNE L --38V-10' BY:— i I CIT T OF MIAMI HLl4MENT LME I n ------ - - - I - - i - - S. W.- - IST. AVENUE— - - - - - - — 10 SEWER 1 m 3� L EASEPENT — — — (D8.1056, PG. 45V I I ` Ia'.R 1E..10rRwLMEI UESTRMLIN E LEVELS 29,31,33 a SCALE: r - 161-0 �y — —. —.— — — ——.—.—._.—.——.—.—.--- — ——.—.—.--- ——._.—.—.—.—.—.—.—.——.—.—.—.—.— — — — — — — — — — — - 6 I) EO y FIETRO RAIL CVERNE4D STRXTURE omitted Into the r cord in ccnne - m z. -t cr 't 17 03 Priscilla A. I iha y cr City Clerk F LL w� 5 .1/ MWER Lu u r m�� t:3y approval 03-26-03 W I JCS L CD V16' -I' -O' LL 0224 a -I 03— 811 11111- 111111= 1111111 I it - 111 !lil= 11111- 111111=' 1111111 f i1= 111 ll= 11111- 111111 11I!:INS ll !1- li= 11'. 111 X11-� illy=i �■■■■_� 11111= �■■■■ 11111=' �■■..■ I_ 11.01111 !1= i _I I '!.= 1111 11= 111 11 _ Illi 1111_ IF 111 i1= 111 11 111 11 111 111_,; !1= 11' !li-, IIII 11 111 11= 111 111 I_ A i ib ::= 111 1-1- 111 11- 111 111 I %E!=n■Y■��==�r�■■='f aa■r=_'.I u��■=9', n=1 ■■='I= a—u■■ 11--1 111 11= 111 111'i_ 111 i1= 111 11 _! 111 _11-i 11..:!i.l !t- 11" 'l1-� IIII 11=� 111 11- 111 1111_ i1= 1111 1i1=' 111 11-1 111 11=! 111 IIII !1=_ 11'1lu� 11141_!1 11'I!1- ■1 1111 it 1111 '�11 IIiIill=! Ilil� !IIII !1_I iL- �!i1= MA 11'Ilill 11'11 11=� Illli ril1l !1- IN '!1~ 11" =l1-1 11'" r■-, :.' 1 lii= 111 it i 11'11 11= 11111 111 alal 11"l11(_ it 111 Ill it 1 Ilii i1= 11111 ri11 !1- = 11" '!1- 11r"Lo Irl -'!1 11"=l1V %E!=n■Y■��==�r�■■='f aa■r=_'.I u��■=9', n=1 ■■='I= a—u■■ _111= III -1L=- 11=111= N -111- Fir _� -111= 11=111= RUN 11=111 111- _111= III -1L=- 11=111= 111- -111= III=11- 11=111 111- =111_ .111= 111-11- ��111=_ 111- =1 -- 1 1..e 1..d 1.■J 110-1 1■._I -■■■=1 too in Ion! few --I Ind INN -=I Ind INNJ II11U ME Iffi--sm! In 0111111111111111' 100=1 I■.=i I■■-! I..-1 I..=1 111= =r == =—=nl -..■- a■ ■.=i ■--■■■_I IIF_. __R Ind land 1..j -■■■_I 100 -.--.■-1 1.—■■■=! — =ZZ -.0-1 u.11-llruI — ,.■_ _ - _- :: - =..r-� f.. _ _ 11-1-...-1 u. ;n - nL End 1107�41V MIC 1100-1 u. -11 Il-r.._I -1111.d INN -11=11r■■-� :1111- _. __ _ s..=1 u. =11 11-ru-1 ur _- bins ion Ion -••_ _�- r - ��- _-_-1111:: _ 1111 _ — _ -'.__- oil ftflftf IsPAP ■ I IUir• h IIN, Ing m II I qbqR ►.m I ■0"I PAP 0 1 rfim, rm MIMI W1 A111 =..g _..l !_..l !_..l !=..l =..� !_.01 ' _1181 NEI !=11111 I_w '=m -u._ _11.rn _1111--mal!_n._u= 1111.-1111_ -m '_11u _001 -.0'_.n i_m '_..I -n11_ '.a=■.11.-11r =1111.-001 - -11n Mai 11 10-mii 1 REE 118-01,11100" _ =- - -- - 1 �■■■■■l 7ONE _■■■■� 1111��1 _ =11111 =11111_- 111inAl '111 lin 1111 111 =11 '111__'-11 1111 1!'_i! Ili!! '.1111 liu '1111 li,VIII =1iu X11 -1i - u .VIII -1i!! liq :I1!'_j' ll �=1!'_i_'ll -1!'_ I�IIi!! =1i!! 1111_' -ll -lip11 4=11- Ci! ild 1!_ Iiia IIII-1i!! 1111 _IbII_ ,iill III i11t =11 _illl!' !'ll -1! I_IIi!! ;1111 _ �=1i ro EEnnmE T .•—i9o•.m o.,w, /..mw new � ELEV _"v'CH-SQQ�4 mtl wnu /.�•tl ucw LEVEL v ,� A.sa o�tuM /,ssr.r _ LEVEL 72 a, nvr wnxt l •Hvtl � _ _ •1]a'�• OAlIM1 IEVEL 70 r. .—r/IY wruM / :mr rrcm •:arY wnxu /.ar�r�i+cw `Y �� _ _ •ora• wtwa / AdY - .—mr wont l •mr twvD � _ _ _ •m0 Dam --- •rovr tu,uu i •mr Ncw .. t , I LEVEL tE / w -m .rasa nmxa nasr �j Evan 4 __-- •wYDoran i •mfo ncvo�- •ter onnaa I� � _ _ _ .wtl w,w / •mom- II _- _ �I •ix•Y wow /.Ha•Y rww •ffir oanrn � •urr ncm r ��---- .nsr oaten /.vsv rxw --� tEVEL LU�_ _ T t - - _ •pl'a• ATY DAiIM /.LYY NLVD 'Y -i._j LLVE� 5 +rr wtwn l.ua wE�c,w11 �� ', V LEVE17 r .xr D.nw l air races y�T` -• i\ II rtl Dano / nnn�ncLw�-� dOs ✓ tJ� BUILDING SECTION SCALE 1' - 20'-0' R V L tithh—rt htawr Oaign Mang j 2560 SW. nth Ave vi -i w Uas as , 670 iM.l Zit LU i b ti,' k ,:i g eyL': `t,+ri :. 1-d3�wdl Gib; Clerk -17-C J LCR "«a �4 BUILDING SECTION_ SCALE: 1- - 20-13' R V L Alft— lntriw Design ph,nning 2560 S.W. 27th Ave FL (305) S29. I (FAk 529 19 li L 7� 1 LU: �TII i yr "ij P) 4 1 sit �'-� R• 0 h � +"M1 �.S -. {, � 3� .P : f...' S � �' ;+�, hyo ..e �a +� .,fi'4� .f@..' o , limp I IS o n1, 1 ^`� 'w s �'Yf � 4-ria-4�-_� jl q'�"• *_m' :m.3..'�... 0`� _... vim All Pgn .. .r R ♦ � .L � � �+ „{_`„� vseJ,F, ] i"T .,a ° ������'+�� .J�k _ w. j • P u y lP^u 4 � t wM. _ ey r 1 • y+ ION iL Ja�� n ' F "+.WY �.5� � C w.r•' 4 �� �- P x4 .Y-.s.r� i -IY'f �� II' i-w•=•`r'� :r - '!�'i.�t �a �`� �� ' �€ �v��.t �=`^�,-f� �"-mow , �.._. •'-.`"',-.,,,'y.2. �`°��'� �,t .. !t �"._. a � �`.'It a tot. .m x?- C �'` - '�(• '. s^ �"�r�z+s'"^' ''' 3' ' { '�, �'P'�:'„�•_ `� .' Rid +;; P �' 4 i �.a„..� a � � 1 l.- f. � - �,;... >�d,+ r ,�&" .ir£''. ' � , µ�t. �a. 'e-� �-e w.Tw'`. .r �, .4.,..1.x.. - P.r- r � �=rte s 4 4 0 �y p � � �, •- �,� X43 ' ,y .11+ Sty { ',�.: * .� '2e• .,r.ge T �'#a� r . �Mi i A � NIL �-2-�.'�r h � �': €: # w 3f€' % {,-b .:�. w.w..+,+w1 •� ......+Ww-.,, Y �. '�'''"zT,} n+ 7,� I C t. .Yat r,-. ` ~ .� � _r Fw * �r I � .... ♦ c7f� 1•�ylJ gi ii. ', ., I . �`�� �•' � i k - � } w �. TMA iy � � � e � �` ,,,,. �,` w � e w... r s �P ° �� -`gyp .*•' .f � -.� 7' j °a f R .+r� _ �. e xis` w, �'I� � � 1 s.,.i � - � � �. ,�;,- • � ,�'� _ ¢� '"' t t'a•k ri.. �-Pt - r-''` x r 1 7:. j -s« t 5r.s >� P� i� �! •.. � ►fit' t V f Err. , x 'i r 5=1 11M n'{+8�?t. -: 1� r..r} gp 1� S y.��i•Y y=�" `•. !^ Tk4 ' - t iYeF P h t'E zAi _ NEO VERTIKA Miami, Florida Existing Condition ublic • �7 -03 REVUELTA VEGA LEON P. A ARCHITECTURE • INTERIOR DESIGN • PLANNING ............................ 03- 811 / Nil" Mj MA 54 64 0 TOR FIR ISO OE NEO VERTIKA Existing Condition Miami, Florida JW WAR� Y 'P,"'roval d irtr,, t.he public Citj — " �=r.k b 9 REVUELTA VEGA LEON P A ARCHITECTURE - INTERIOR DESIGN - PLANNING ............................ 03- 811 �� I d) 9-1 A NEO VERTIKA Miami, Florida I 3D Model Study t, �jppiy approval T Submitted Into the public rc-C-0 �c` ite,r-1 e Ps REVUELTA VEGA LEON R A ARCHITECTURE - INTERIOR DESIGN - PLANNING ............................ 03- Aft . PolicyCommittee: Governor of State of Florida Mr. Jeb Bush Designee: Dr. Pamella Dana Chair of Miami -Dade Delegation Representative Rene Garcia Designee: Ms. Debra Owens Chair of Governing Board of South Florida Water Management District Mr. Nicolas J. Gutierrez, Jr. Designee: Ms. Irela Bague Miami -Dade State Attorney Ms. Katherine Fernandez -Rundle Designee: Mr. Gary Winston Mayor of Miami -Dade County Mayor Alex Penelas Designee: Mr. Henry F. Sori Mayor of Miami Mayor Manuel A. Diaz Designee: Mr. Otto Boudet-Murias City of Miami Commissioner Commissioner Joe Sanchez Designee: Mr. Steve Wright Miami -Dade County Commissioner Commissioner Bruno Barreiro Designee: Mr. Alfredo Gonzalez Chair of Miami River Marine Group Mr. Charles "Bud" Morton Designee: Mr. Richard Bunnell Chair of Marine Council Mr. Michael Karcher Designee: Mr. Phil Everingham Executive Director of Downtown Development Authority Mr. Dana A. Nottingham Designee: Mr. Adam Lukin Chair of Greater Miami Chamber of Commerce Mr. William O. Cullom Designee: Ms. Megan Kelly Neighborhood Representative Appointed by City of Miami Commission Dr. Ernest Martin Designee: Mr. Michael Cox Neighborhood Representative Appointed by Miami -Dade Commission Ms. Sallye Jude Designee: Ms. Jane Caporelli Representative from Environmental or Civic Organization Appointed by the Governor Ms. Janet McAliley Designee: Ms. Theo Long Member at Large Appointed by the Governor Mr. Robert Parks Member at Large Appointed by Miami -Dade Commission Ms. Sara Babun Designee: Mr. Tom Parker Member at Large Appointed by City of Miami Commission Mr. Cleve Jones, Jr. Designee: Captain Beau Payne Managing Director Captain David Miller Miami River Commission c/o Rosenstiel School 4600 Rickenbacker Causeway Miami, Florida 33149 Office: (305) 361-4850 Fax: (305) 361-4755 email: mrc@rsmas.miami.edu July 17, 2003 Honorable Chairman Johnny L. Winton City Hall 3500 Pan American Drive Miami, FL 33133 Re: Recommendation for Approval of July 17, 2003 City Commission Agenda Item PZ -1 Dear Chairman Winton: This letter serves as the Miami River Commission's (MRC) "official statement" to all City Commissioners, requested in City Resolution 00- 320, regarding July 17, 2003 City Commission agenda item PZ -1, which impacts the Miami River corridor. The MRC respectfully recommends the City Commission approve the Major Use Special Permit for "NEO Vertika", located at 690 SW 1St Ave. The proposed mixed use/residential building at this "Lower River" site is consistent with The Miami River Corridor Urban Infill Plan, our award winning strategic plan to revitalize the Miami River. Neo Vertika, featuring 443 residential units and 24,000 square feet of commercial use, is set back 50 -feet from the River, with a publicly accessible section of the Miami River Greenway. Respectfully, Robert L. Parks, Esq. Chair, Miami River Commission Cc. Honorable Mayor Manuel A. Diaz City Administrator Joe Arriola City Clerk Priscilla Thompson City Attorney Alex Vilarello SUBMITTED INTO THE PUBLIC RECORD FOR ITEM Pz_i ON 7 -i9 -o3. oJ- 81 1