Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutR-03-0419J-03-417 05/07/03 RESOLUTION No. 03— 419 A RESOLUTION OF THE MIAMI CITY COMMISSION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER'S ENGAGEMENT OF GURRI MATUTE, P.A., SELECTED FROM THE LIST OF PRE -APPROVED ARCHITECTURAL FIRMS APPROVED BY RESOLUTION NO. 02-144, FOR DESIGN DEVELOPMENT, PREPARATION OF BIDDING AND CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS, AND CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION CONSULTING SERVICES FOR THE PROJECT ENTITLED "GIBSON PARK IMPROVEMENTS - PHASE I, B-3305" IN DISTRICT 5, IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $200,000 BASED ON (1) THE SCOPE OF SERVICES REQUIRED FOR SAID PROJECT, AND (2) TERMS AND CONDITIONS SET FORTH IN THE AGREEMENT WITH GURRI MATUTE, P.A. EXECUTED PURSUANT TO RESOLUTION NO. 02-144; AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE NECESSARY DOCUMENTS, IN A FORM ACCEPTABLE TO THE CITY ATTORNEY, FOR SAID PURPOSE; AND ALLOCATING FUNDS, IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $200,000, FOR SERVICES AND EXPENSES INCURRED BY THE CITY FROM CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM PROJECT NO. 331341. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. The City Manager's engagement of Gurri Matute, P.A., selected from the list of pre -approved architectural firms, approved by Resolution No. 02-144, for design development, preparation of bidding and construction A 7 A C,.,u11 1!i T �a7j CITY CQC2, MEETIUG Cw MAY 0 C. 2003 rtewlutwn NO. 103- 419 documents, and construction administration consulting services, for the project entitled "Gibson Park Improvements - Phase I, B-3305" in District 5, in an amount not to exceed $200,000, based on (1) the scope of services required for the project and (2) terms and conditions set forth in the agreement with Gurri Matute, P.A. executed pursuant to Resolution No. 02-144, with funds, in an amount not to exceed $200,000, allocated for services and expenses incurred by the City, from Capital Improvements Program Project No. 331341. Section 2. The City Manager is further authorized -L' to execute the necessary documents, in a form acceptable to the City Attorney, for said purpose. Section 3. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its adoption and signature of the Mayor.' 1� The herein authorization is further subject to compliance with all requirements that may be imposed by the City Attorney, including but not limited to those prescribed by applicable City Charter and Code provisions. If the Mayor does not sign this Resolution, it shall become effective at the end of ten calendar days from the date it was passed and adopted. If the Mayor vetoes this Resolution, it shall become effective immediately upon override of the veto by the City Commission. Page 2 of 3 03- 419 PASSED AND ADOPTED this 8th day of _ May , 2003. ATTEST: PRI ILLA A. THOMPSON CITY CLERK APPROVED aio-ro'iFORM AND CORRECTNESS:t'/ ,A„irT�TTORNEY VILARELLO CIT W7212:tr:AS NUEL A. DIAZ, MAY R Page 3 of 3 03— 419 CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA CAm9 INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM Honorable Mayor and Members APR 2 4 2003 TO of the City Sion DATE: FILE SUBJECT: Gibson Park Improvements - Phase I FROM: j REFERENCES: oe rriola Resolution ENCLOSURES: of Administrator RECOMMENDATION It is respectfully recommended that the City Commission adopt the attached Resolution authorizing the Chief Administrator/ City Manager to negotiate and execute a Professional Services Agreement with Gurri Matute, P.A., for professional services not to exceed $200,000 for the project "Gibson Park Improvement - Phase I". BACKGROUND The Department of Capital Improvements has analyzed the need to enter into an agreement with an architectural firm for the design and development of improvements at Gibson Park. The improvements includes, but is not limited to, renovating the pool restrooms and recreation building and providing drainage between the pool building, library and recreation building. Gurri Matute, P.A. was selected from the list of pre - approved architectural firms. Negotiation for the cost of professional services, which includes design development, bidding and construction documents and construction administration consulting services, is necessary to ensure the City receives an equitable proposal. Funds allocated for Gurri Matute, P.A. professional services shall not to exceed $200,000. FISCAL IMPACT None JA/ JCC/JBO/ AB 03- 419 J -02-.2I 24/02 RESOLUTICN INC . © 2 14 4 A RESOLUTION OF TF£ MIAMI CITY COMMISSION, WITH ATTACHMENT, ACCEPTING THE R.ECOWENDATION OF THE CITY MANAGER TO APPROV? THE FINDIN"PS OF THE SELECTION COMMITTEES, PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS, FOR THE MOST uUALIFIEC FIRMS TO PROVIDE PRCFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR PUBL_C WORKS CATEGORY "B" DESIGNATED PROJECTB FOR 2002 THROUGH 2004 LISTED BY SPECIALTY IN RANK ORDER; AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO NEGOTIATE ANL EXECUTE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGnEEMENTS W:TH EACR FIRM IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED THE AMOUNT INDICATED ZN ATTACHMENT. "P_" FOR E?CH S PEC.IALTY FOR E_=iCH FIRM; ALLOCATING FUNDS FROM INDIVIDUAL PROJECT ACCOUNT'S. =:X:' 1oito r.k`t BZ IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section I. The recommendation *of the City Manager to approv-e the findings of the selection corrumittee, pursuant ;.o Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firms to provide professicnal engineering construction management services for Public Works Category "B" designated projects for 2002 through 2C04, listed herein in rank order, are accepted: I. The Corradino Group, Inc. 2. Nova Consulting Inc. 3. Marlin Engineering Inc. 4. Civil-Cadd Engineering Inc. Consultants, Inc. (ALTERNATE) 6. PBS&J (ALTERNATE) CITY C0 9wszoN x== br FEB 14 2002 &SMW M M6 03--11 9 Section 2. Tae recommendation of the City Manage_ to apF_ove the findings of the selection corxmittee, pursuant tc, Request for rroposa-Y, as to the most qualified firms tc provide professional ADA requirement services for ?ub-ic Worcs Category "B" designated projects for 20C2 t^rough 20"4, listed herein ir rank order, are accepted: i. PBS&: 2. n 0 Archizects + Planners, Inc. 3. Gur=_ MatMte, P. A. ;ALTERNATE) 'Sec_ion 3. The recommendation of the C_ty Manager tc approve the findings of the selection committee, pursuant to Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firms to provide professional architectural engineering services for Public Works Category "B" designated projects for 2CO2 through 2004, lasted herein in rank order, are accepted: CSA Southeast, Inc. (C.A.P. Eng. Con s.:ltants, Inc,) 2, lndiac Service Corporation Section 4. ':he recommendation of :he City Manager to approve the findings or the selection committee, pursuant- to Request for Prcposals, as to the most qualified firms to provide professional architecture services for Public Works Category "B" designated projects for 2002 through 2004, listed herein in rant order, are accepted; 1. Gurr= Matute PA 2. Zyscovich, Inc. 3. R.J. ueisenbottle Architects, P.A. 4. R.E. Chisholm Architects, Inc. 5. Bernello, Ajamil a Partners, Inc. (ALTERNATE) E. PBSJ (ALTERNATE) ' Page 2 of 7 03- 419 v v A J tl ... `..^...� ...� — ...��. v ... .. a ...i _A-1 Z.?c 101 r . L:4 Section. 5. The recommendation of the ;,ity Manager tc approve the findings of the selection com_-rittee, pursuant to Request `or Proposals, as to the most cual:.fied firms tc provide p_ofessiena= environimenta; engineering services for Public Works Category "B" designated projects fox 2002 t -'--rough 2004, listed h=_rei.- in rank order, are accepted: 1. ATC Group Services Inc. 2. H.J. Ross Associates, Inc. 3. URS Corporation END Engineers, Inc. �. Nova Consulting Inc. (ALTERNATE) 6. Consulting Engineering & Science, Inc. (ALTERNATE) Section 6. The recommendation of the Ciry Manager to approve the _Findings of =he selection committee, pursuant to Request for ?roposals, as to the most qualified firms :.o provide prcfessional general encineering services for Public Forks Category "B" designated projects for 2002 through 2004, listed .aerein in rank order, are accented: .L. ra'.J. Ross Associates, Inc. 2. Kunde, Sprecher & Associates, Inc. 3. Metric Engineering, Inc. 4. PBS&,T 5. Marl. -Ln Engineering, Inc. 6. PHS Engineering Corp. 7. URS Corporator. (ALTERNATE) B. Ximiey-:corn and Associates, Inc. (?1LTERN�,TE) Section 7. The recommendation of the City Manager to approve the findings of tae selection committee, pursuant to Request for Proposals, as to the mos: quali-fied firms to provide Page 3 of 7 03- 419 Cf prc`ess onai landscape architect -,:re services for Public Wr; ks Category "B" designated projects for 2002 through 2004, Ls=ed herein in rank order, are accepted: _ . Falcon & B,,eno �. Curtis & Rogers Desicn _T_udio, Inc. 3. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. EDAW, Inc, (ALTERNATE) Section n. the recomrrendation of the City Manager to approve the findings of the selection committee, pursuant to Request for Proposals, as to the mcst qualified firms to provide professional mechanical engineering services for Public wor3cs Category "n" designated projects for 2002 through 2004, listed herein in rank order, are accepted; Louis J Aguirre & Associates, P.A. 2. Johnson, Hernande-z Associates Inc. _. Gartek Engineering Corporatio_i (ALTERNATE) Section 9. T!:e recommendation of the City Manager =o approve t' --.e findings of the selection committee, pursuant to Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firms to protide profess_ona_ structural engineering services for Public Works Category "B" das�gnated prcjects for 2002 through 200, listed herein in rank order, are accepted: ?. San Martin Associates, Inc. 2. Avart, Inc. 3. EAC Consulting, Inc. Section 10. The recommendation of the City Manager to approve the fLxnd.Jnca of the selection_ com-mattee, pursuant to Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firms to provide Page 4 of 7 03- 419 professional surveying and mapping services :or Public Woks Category "B" designated projects for 2002 through 2004, listed herein ir_ rank order, are accepted: 1. PBS&J 2. Fernando Z. Ga*e_•1 P. L. S., Inc. 3. weidener Surveying and Mapping, P. A. 4. Craven Thompson & Assoc:a=es, Inc. a. Williams, at -field & Stoner, Inc. 6. Leiter, serer & Assoc:Gtes, Inc. Section 11. The recommendation of the City Manage_ to apprcve the findings of the selection committee, pursuant tc Request fcr Proposals, as to the most qualified firms to provide professional value ar_alysis and cos4 estimate services for Public Woks Category "B" designated projects for 2002 through 2004, i.sted herein in rank order, are acoepted: �. A2 Group, Inc. 3. Grace & Naeem Uddin (ALTERNATE) Section 12. The recornendation of the City Manager to app.rcve the findings of the selection commit:ee, pursuant to Regwest for Proposals, as to the most qualified firr,, to provide profes-sicna.1 air condi:ionir_g services for Public Works Category "8" designated projects for 2062 th=ough 2004, listed herein is accepted: -• Grace & Naeem Uddin Sect:.on 13. The recommendation of the City Manager to approve the findings of the selection committee, pursuant to Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified f7rm to provide Page 5 of 7 A 03- 419 „^-i i �_crJrJG rJ� • -. , �. _ l.�G J.0 Ur^ l l„C .moi=_ ..._ _ :.b,. _ C pre=essio7al life safety services fcr Public itio_ks Category designated pro ec__ for 2002 -."rough 2C34, listed herein is accented: 1. Gurri Matute, ?.A. Section_ 14. The recommendation cf the City Manage_ to approve the findings of the selection corrmittee, p-rsuan: to Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firms to prov_- de professional roofing services for Public Works Category "B” designated projects for 2032 throagh 2004, listed herein in rank order, are accepted: 1. Bui;ding Diagnostics Associates, PA 2. international Logistics Group Secticn 15. The City Manager is autacrizedll to negotiate and execute Professional Services Agreementz, in a fcrm acceptable to tZe City .Attorney, with eac^ fire in an amount not to exceed z: -±e amount indicated i.n Attachment "A" for each specialty for each firm, with funds allocated f=ort individual project accounts. -' The herein authorization =s further subject to comp;:ance with a_1 recuiremen=s that may be imposed by the City Attorney, irclud_rg but not '__nited to those prescribed by applicable City charter and Code provisions. Page 6 of 7 03- 41.9 Section 15. Th -;s Resolution s-ha11 become r F AJC 1O.Lo r- . kyt effec:-ve immediately upon its acoFtion and signal, -,re c: the Mavor. PASSEL AND ADOPTED :his 14th day o= February , 2002, I+ri;WUEL A. DIAZ, �i ATTEST: iylyA Scheider Acting City,,-C�lerk A: PRO A//TC) ,FG�1 AND CORRECTNESS WJANDRO VIL T. ATTORNEY W5975:LB =` If tine Mayor does not sign this Resclu_ion, it saali become effective s: the end of ter. calendar days :mor,+ the date it was passed and adopted. If t^e Mayor ve_ces tris Resolution, it shall becoae efiective immediately Upon override of the ve=o by the City ConarLission, Page 7 of 7 t � � ..,- -,v I I `"L�Rr..= Ur r- t...0 r�T = ACHM�NT "n" ENGIN; EKING C0.:5TRJCTION M dAGE�!ENT: S6CC�, OCO AD,A (DISABLE RECCIREME`TS) 100,000 -�dt�b loll F.C,:= r:RCHITECTURAL-ENGINEERING SERVICES (Building & Zoning): $6CO,000 t?RC'ITECTURE: $60C,DOC ENJ=RONMENT:�L ENGINEERING: $600,000 GENE -RING: $700,000 r.ANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE: $400,OOC MECHAN7CA:., ENGINEERING: $200, OOC STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING: $200,000 SURVEYING FyND MP?PIING: $200,00C V;sLUE ANALYSIS AND COST ESTIMATE: $200,000 AIR CONCiTIOt,'ING. $200, 300 L=FE SAFETY: $200,000 ROOF-7NG: S200,C00 03— 419 TOTAL P.05 Budgetary Impact Analysis Department Capital Imrovements 46 Division Commission Meeting Date: Mav , 2003 Title and brief description of legislation or attached ordinance/resolution: Resolution authorizing the CityManager's P gage'* e t of an architectural firm for the project entitled "Gibson Park Improvements — Phase I, B-3305" 1. Is this item related to revenue? NO ■ Yes ❑ (If yes, skip to item 44) 2. Are there sufficient funds in Line Item? CIP Project #: 331341 (If applicable) Yes: Index Code: Minor: Amount: No: r'' Complete the following information: 3. Source of funds: Amount budgeted in the line item: $ 10,370 Balance in line item: $ 10.370 Amount needed in line item: $ 200.000 Qiiffin.iPnt fiinrlc will hP trancferreti from the following line items: ACTION ACCOUNT NUMBER TOTAL Project No./Index./Minor Object From 331341.589305.6.860 $189,630 From $ To 331341.319205.6.240 $189,630 To $ 4. Comments: Approved by: eef ?p rle 3, Department Director/Designee Date APPROVALS V Date: 7,1' C6 03- 419