Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutM-03-0886ITEM PZ 7 FIRST READING ZONING FACT SHEET Case Number: 2003-0659 16 -Jun -03 Item 1 Location: Approximately 1770 N. Bayshore Drive Legal: (Complete legal description on file with the Department of Hearing Boards) Applicant: Gilberto Pastoriza, Esquire on behalf of Baywatch Apts. Inc. 2665 S. Bayshore Drive #420 Miami, FL 33133 (305) 854-0800 Zoning: R-4 Multifamily High -Density Residential Request: Change of zoning as listed in Ordinance No. 11000, as amended, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Article 4, Section 401, Schedule of District Regulations from R-4 Multifamily High -Density Residential to SD -6 Central Commercial -Residential District. Purpose: This will allow a unified commercial development site. Recommendations: Planning & Zoning Dept.: Approval. Public Works: No comments. Plat and Street Committee: N/A. Miami -Dade County: No comments. Enforcement History, If any Case No: Last Hearing Found Violation(s) Ticketing Action: Daily $0.00 Affidavit Non -Compliance Issued Warning Letter sent Total Fines to $0.00 Lien Recorded Comply Order CEB Action: History: The Planning Advisory Board recommended approval of the Change of Land Use on May 21, 2003 by a vote of 8-0. Analysis: See supporting documentation. Zoning Board Resolution: ZB 2003-0729 Zoning Board: Recommended approval to City Commission. Vote: 9-0 City Commission: N/A. ANALYSIS FOR ZONING CHANGE Approximately 1770 N. Bayshore Drive CASE NO: 2003-0659 Pursuant to Article 4, Section 401 of Ordinance 11000, as amended, the Zoning Ordi- nance of the City of Miami, Florida, the subject proposal for an amendment to the Zoning Atlas has been reviewed as follows: The request is to change the Zoning designation as follows: Lots 4, Block 8, of ARRAMAR SUBDIVISION, according to Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 5, from R4 "Multifamily High -Density Residential' to SD -6 "Central Commercial -Residential District". The following findings have been made: • It is found that immediately adjacent to the south, the area is designated SD -6 "Central Commercial -Residential District". • It is found that the requested change will represent a logical extension of the commercial activities existing immediately to the south. • It is found that the requested change will increase the possibility of the subject property being developed and enhanced in a manner that will directly benefit the adjacent area. Based on these findings, the Planning and Zoning Department is recommending approval of the application as presented. 03— 886 ANALYSIS FOR ZONING CHANGE CASE NO. 2003-0659 Yes No N/A Fv-1 ❑ ❑ In harmony with Comp. Plan; does not require amendment. ❑ F -z-1 ❑ In harmony with established land use. Fv-1 ❑ ❑ Is related to adjacent and nearby districts. Fv� ❑ ❑ Is within scale with needs of neighborhood or City. 0 ❑ ❑ Maintains similar population density pattern. Fil ❑ ❑ Existing district boundaries are illogically drawn. © ❑ ❑ Changes or changing conditions that make change necessary. F-/7 ❑ ❑ Positively influences living conditions in neighborhood. 0 ❑ ❑ Has similar impact oiatraffic; does not affect public safety. 0 ❑ ❑ Has similar impact on drainage. W-1 ❑ ❑ Has similar impact on light and air to adjacent areas. ❑e ❑ ❑ Has similar impact on property values in adjacent areas. ❑ ❑ ❑ Contributes to improvement or development of adjacent property. W-1 ❑ ❑ Conveys same treatment as to owners within same classification. W ❑ ❑ Property is unfairly limited under existing zoning. ❑� ❑ ❑ Difficult to find other adequate sites in surrounding area. ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ o 03- b86 seaIse'.. .. _ >. i S) S F- 3 s s 7 a z A r e W $ • i s it 13 3 • !m!1 INsIs in : .1 s :29 aIo Q nz'za 4 t � t� t Ji 2 it 21• 2 I a 1. 2 s ♦ D c l• e sR $ °v s SHORE - I _1'., ME ♦ 2a 23 ST. �� w .. .. .. .. .. b la•T y i TERRANOVA 4. 7 a a• ♦ s : pNCY z fRi ii • s s ;: Is Is N le ¢ u I 9 e 7• s e r 1 BISCAYNE 9 e 11 4 21110 II las so - yy T las' I A ' TRACT RA; M . 7 i c. Ax ' lae • v 1. 17 IS N 11 0 9 6 5 ♦ 1 I W • _ 0 b !• 2f0r b )! 22 S 1. ' N -E. 'L'L I:.:RDSO MtILS ORE J t1 ti 12 II 9 � a a ♦ S I = i i ae t J PARCEL ~• ' 11 10 9 • t7 9 e ♦ 3 ;, 8 2 IRA C O � W N. 2 I 1'' L TRgC it M 16 �+ 1'. t 11 l0 , O 7 • D ♦ I • •; I _ I G 1 aero ♦ I PARCEL 2 I U M 10 , • ! ` Ne,l \ SC O�� A RaST. N.E.21 . J`�� N I;--1 IT 7 i S 4)o ••0111I,i 7 41 e 7 a 2 s z . ..2 O a' 2b, m' II! TR. 4" vi • _ 1 Z 19 1 p 0 9 8 7 i s S 2 I' R 10 , • 7 ZC s I- a) a • 7 1 • D %\ 10 ' NN !• "B• Is 1♦ la i 1 W 7 • s ♦ S 2 A q D ♦ S e I , 9 + 1 .. .. .. M . lae E�.� - )s t • = f •o „ aE W s a A I♦ w �wRv4 2___ - [�..- 4. RA 44 ! ! 2• i 11 2 > (I 1 Is _IEwEATaar _ N. ! SCHOOL b fl S t 65 a ♦H 2 10 ♦ ! 1 1 •• S T. TEMPLE' • �I� :: ISRAEL i 6RAN0 TR l C, 4 iPARK suB. UNION :DPLAi `• , ` 1 9 _II I, II. �P♦' QP� 12 11 Q •ate O 1 _ ' » .. sf 1`- so • n �' sz12 : = 111 t/f a9 TY CEMETERY ( N. .s �� ,a $T. PR.. 1 ' 1 3 S 2 I ai 1 T 1Q1 s co 9 10 IT 9 10 17 ly rIO+IRa AI• Q )a. .�•+ TRACT •A" ` AIENDEO 4�`� OMNI ANNEX E���I.Ta T R 4 ?> IL a 13 rcoAdilk AM. 170 ST : ..D VT. 31 • ill 17 IA a ♦ 5 o�V- I f w tv. E. R� 7 7 • Q c 8 • . 'Q -y • ' 17 N as •• TRACT •A ��• i e� s - ` gR,9RNOR7N • 0'r u N T CT •g" �� .. � RMRIIfO IDT• • p ��� 97 .a If 1♦e Is •h �. 16 ST. D ♦ TwwT v PLAZA �( m A o2y 10� 13 12 aPlilcsE' E Q N.E I T- .Cto • I . rRACT'A' I I I T. W: N.E. 15 e•r -' r 9 R a: T_I A • ""EWA 7 Ott.. 000000000iv :., C • . O Ex ' E . A.S. C O } D e 1 -.fe• Q• S p . • S • 5 Y t TRAC •.. I • _ 17 tij � Is :ue - CEN ER ,; W c� 2 � 8 g s• I= elo s g is. '••''• :..,.•A Z .•s . a• y •• >• S 7C D HERALO PARK susli/ ,/DRN $.ee of $ lee • ... .e•.•o • o Ep4MSA >a 7 OD 1- i 1•t! • _Q LAI i N: E: mwam t.RgR INO RE-sIr 4 S T. �odoeoonoeoo ' t ' - I i z e, 17 15 15 11 1! IL � 71 /0 03- 886 Section 22A. Nature and Requirements of Zoning Board Report to City Commission Circle appropriate condition(s): When pertaining to the ming of land under application made under Article 22, the report and recommendation of the Zoning Board shall show that the Zoning Board has studied and considered, where applicable, whether or not: a) The ' proposed change conforms with the adopted Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan and does not require a plan amendment. b) The proposed change is in hammy with the established land use pattern. c) The proposed change is related to adjacent and nearby district d) The change suggested is not out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the city. e) The proposed change maintains the same or similar population density pattern and thereby does not increase or overtax the load on public facilities such as schools, utilizes, streets, etc. f) Existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in rotation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. g) Changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed change necessary. h) The proposed change positively influences living conditions in the neighborhood. 7 The proposed change has the same or similar impact on traffic and does not affect public safety to a greater extent than the existing ' n. D The Proposed change has the same or similar impact on drainage as the existing claissfication. k) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on light and air to adjacent areas as the existing classification. 1) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on property values in the adjacent area as the existing classification. m) The proposed change will contribute to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accord with existing regulations. �3-886 n) The proposed change conveys the same treatment to the individual owner as to owners within the same classification and the immediate area and furthers the protection of the public welfare. o) There are substantial reasons why the use of the property is unfairly limited under existing zoning. p) it is difficult to find other adequate sites in the surrounding are for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. Motion: After considering the factors set forth in Section 2210 of Ordinance 11000,1 move that the request on agenda item # be recommended to the City Commission fo roval) (denial). Signature Agenda Item Print Name (,),("I03 Date 03 886 Miami Zoning Board Resolution No.: 2003-0729 Monday, June 16, 2003 Mr. Allan Shulman offered the following resolution and moved its adoption Resolution: AFTER CONSIDERING THE FACTORS SET FORTH IN ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 11000, THE ZONING BOARD RECOMMENDED APPROVAL TO THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CHANGE OF ZONING IN THE OFFICIAL ZONING ATLAS OF ORDINANCE NO. 11000, AS AMENDED, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, PAGE 23, ARTICLE 4, SECTION 401, SCHEDULE OF DISTRICT REGULATIONS, FROM R-4 MULTIFAMILY HIGH- DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO SD -6 CENTRAL COMMERCIAL -RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY 1770 NORTH BAYSHORE DRIVE, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 4, BLOCK 8, MIRAMAR (5-4), PUBLIC RECORDS OF MIAMI- DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA; ZONED R-4 MULTIFAMILY HIGH-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL. Upon being seconded by Mr. Carlos Martell, the motion was passed and adopted by the following vote: Mr. Charles J. Flowers Mr. Miguel Gabela Mr. Joseph H. Ganguzza Mr. Charles A. Garavaglia Ms. lleana Hemandez Acosta Mr. Carlos Martell Mr. Juvenal A. Pina Mr. Allan Shulman Mr. Angel Urquiola Mr. Georges William AYE: NAY: ABSTENTIONS: NO VOTES: ABSENT: Ms. Fernandez: Motion carries 9-0 Yes Abst Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 9 i Teresita L. FerW=de4 Executive Secretary Hearing Boards Case No. 2003-0659 Item Nbr: 1 t�3- 886 DEPARTMENT OF HEARING BOARDS 444 SW 2"d Avenue, 7t' Floor • Miami, Florida 33130 Telephone 305-416-2030 . Fax 305-416-2035 APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENT TO ZONING ATLAS AND/OR OVERLAY DISTRICT ANY PERSON WHO RECEIVES COMPENSATION, REMUNERATION OR EXPENSES FOR CONDUCTING LOBBYING ACTIVITIES TO REGISTER AS A LOBBYIST WITH THE CITY CLERK, PRIOR TO ENGAGING IN LOBBYING ACTIVITIES BEFORE CITY STAFF, BOARDS, COMMITTEES AND THE CITY COMMISSION. A COPY OF SAID ORDINANCE IS AVAILABLE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK (MIAMI CITY HALL), LOCATED AT 3500 PAN AMERICAN DRIVE, MIAMI, FLORIDA, 33133. APPLICANTS ARE RESPONSIBLE, IF NEEDED, TO BRING AN INTERPRETER FOR THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE TO ANY PRESENTATION BEFORE CITY BOARDS, COMMITTEES AND THE CITY COMMISSION. POWER OF ATTORNEY WILL BE REQUIRED IF NEITHER APPLICANT OR LEGAL COUNSEL REPRESENTING THE APPLICANT EXECUTE -THE APPLICATION OR DESIRE TO MAKE A PRESENTATION BEFORE CITY BOARDS, COMMITTEES AND THE CITY COMMISSION. THIS APPLICATION MUST BE TYPEWRITTEN AND SIGNED IN BLACK INK. IT WILL BE ACCEPTED, ALONG WITH PERTINENT DOCUMENTS, ONLY THE FIRST SEVEN DAYS (1-7) OF THE MONTH FROM 8:00 AM UNTIL 5:00 PM. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE CASHIER LOCATED ON THE 4TH FLOOR WILL CLOSE AT 4:00 PM; THEREFORE, THE COMPLETE APPLICATION, REVIEWED PLANS AND A PAID RECEIPT MUST BE SUBMITTED. I, Gilberto Pastoriza Esq., on behalf of Baywatch Apartments. Inc., hereby apply to the City Commission of the City of Miami for an amendment to the Zoning Atlas of the City of Miami as more particularly described herein and, in support of that request, fumish the following information (see Article 22 of the Zoning Ordinance): 1. Address of property: 1770 N Bayshore Drive Miami, Florida 2. Folio number: - 01-3231-003-0640 3. Two 11x17" original current surveys prepared by a State of Florida Registered Land Surveyor within six months from the date of application. 4. Affidavit and disclosure of ownership of subject property and disclosure of interest (see attached forms). 5. Certified list of owners of real estate within a 500 -foot radius of the outside boundary of the subject property (see pages 5 and 6). 6. At least two (2) photographs that show the entire property (land and improvements). 7. An 8 Y2 x11" copy of all exhibits that will be presented at the hearing shall be attached to this application. 8. Present zoning designation(s): R-4 9. Future zoning designation(s): SD -6 Rev. 0327/03 03- 886 10. Other (specify and attach cover letters explaining why any document you are attaching is pertinent to this application). See attached letter of intent 11. Statement explaining why present zoning designation is inappropriate. See attached letter of intent 12. Statement as to why proposed zoning designation is appropriate. See attached letter of intent 13. Recorded warranty deed and tax forms of the most current year available that show the present owner(s) of the property. 14. Cost of processing according to the City Code: Change of zoning classification: CS, PR, R-1, R-2, per square foot of net lot area $ .15 Minimum $ 635.00 R-3, R-4, O, G/I, HP per square foot of net lot area $ .20 Minimum $ 750.00 C-1, C-2, I, per square foot of net lot area $ .25 Minimum $ 900.00 CBD and all SD's, per square foot of net lot area $ .30 Minimum $ 1,000.00 Public hearing and public meeting mail notice fees, including cost of handling and mailing per notice $ 3.50 15. What is the purpose of this zoning change? To be able to construct a mixed use proiect on the property 16. Is the property within the boundaries of a historic site, historic district or archeological zone designated pursuant to Chapter 23 of the Miami City Code? NO 17. Is the property within the boundaries of an pursuant to Chapter 17 of the Miami City Cc Address 2665 S. Bayshore Drive, #420 Miami. Florida 33133 Telephone (305)854-0800 Date Rev. 03/27/03 2 03- 886 STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE The foregoingi��l1strument was nowledd ,before me this P" -day of T' 20_L�, by &y ' Lb-V-� n C. who is nersr onaltY k4gwnA me or who has produced as identification and who did (did not) take an oath. (Stamp) STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE ARY PUBLIC STATE OF FUMMA COMM=033 IBX). CC8bM 'CD MVrs_q' ;:N? Yom_ F'?r 13.20M The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20 , by _ of a corporation, on behalf of the corporation. He/She is personally known to me or has produced as identification and who did (did not) take an oath. (Stamp) STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE Signature The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of _ 20 , by partner behalf of He/She is personally known to me or who has produced as identification and who did (did not) take an oath. (Stamp) Rev. 03/27/03 Signature 3 (or agent) on a partnership. 03- 886 MITCHELL A. BIERMAN NINA L. BONISKE JAMIE ALAN COLE EDWARD G. GUEDES STEPHEN J. HELFMAN GILBERTO PASTORIZA JOSEPH H. SEROTA NANCY E. STROUD RICHARD JAY WEISS DAVID M. WOLPIN STEVEN W. ZELKOWITZ THOMAS J. ANSBRO* LILLIAN ARANGO DE LA HOZ* ALISON S. BIELER MITCHELL J. BURNSTEIN ELAINE M. COHEN STEPHANIE DEUTSCH* DOUGLAS R. GONZALES JOHN R. HERIN, JR. i -r WEISS SEROTA HELFMAN PASTOIZIZA & GUEDES, P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW MIAMI-DADE OFFICE 2665 SOUTH BAYSHORE DRIVE SUITE 420 MIAMI, FLORIDA 33133 TELEPHONE (305) 854-0800 T£LECOPIER (305) 654-2323 W W W. WS H -F LALAW.CO M BROWARD OFFICE 3107 STIRLING ROAD • SUITE 300 FORT LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA 33312 TELEPHONE (954) 763-4242 • TELECOPIER (954) 764-7770 VIA HAND DELIVERY Ms. Teresita Fernandez City of Miami Hearing Boards 444 S.W. 2nd Avenue Miami, Florida 33130 *OF COUNSEL April 2, 2003 CHRISTOPHER F. KURTZ HARRIET R. LEWIS' PETER A. LICHTMAN KAREN LIEBERMAN* MATTHEW H. MANDEL BERNARD S. MANDLER# MICHAEL J. MARRERO ALEXANDER L. PALENZUELA-MAORI MICHAEL S. POPOK* ANTHONY L. RECIO GARY 1. RESNICK* MARK A. ROTHENBERG SCOTT A. ROBIN DANA J. SCHINDLER GAIL D. SEROTA* ARI C. SHAPIRO JEFFREY P. SHEFFEL MIA M. SINGH JOSE S. TALAVERA SUSAN L. TREVARTHEN Re: Applications to Amend the City of Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan and Zoning Atlas and/or Overlay District Dear Ms. Fernandez: Our firm represents Baywatch Apartments, Inc. ("Baywatch") and MJF Construction Corp. ("MJF") in connection with the captioned matter. Baywatch is the owner and MJF is the contract purchaser of the property legally described in the attached Exhibit "A" (collectively the "Applicants"). The property in question has an address of 1770 N. Bayshore Drive, Miami, Florida (the "Property"). The Property is situated across the street from the recently improved park (the "Park") in the north Omni area. The Applicants are seeking an amendment to the City's Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan (the "Plan") to change the land use designation on the Property from High Density Multi - Family to Restrictive Commercial and an amendment to the City's Zoning Atlas and/or Overlay District (the "Atlas") to change the zoning on the Property from R-4 to SD -6. The City of Miami is experiencing a revival and revitalization of the North Omni area, especially in the area along N. Bayshore in front of the Park. This revival is reflected by the 9— 889 Ms. Teresita Fernandez April 2, 2003 Page 2 various mixed-use projects which have been recently approved in the area. These projects are usually a combination of retail and residential. The existing land use designation and zoning do not allow for mixed use development. This request will allow the development of the Property as a mixed use project similar to and compatible with the recently approved projects in the north Omni area. The proposed amendments to the Plan and the Atlas are consistent and compatible with Chapter 163 of the Florida Statues and the City's Plan. We look forward to the City's favorable review of these applications. Please feel free to call me if you have any questions or require additional information. GP/ms 899001 Attachment WEISS SE80TA HELFMAN 93-» 886 PASTOEIZA & GUEDES, P.A. EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lot 4, Block 8, of MIRAMAR SUBDIVISION, according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 5, at Page 4, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida. 03- 886 I. AFFIDAVIT Before me, the undersigned authority, this day personally appeared _ �� who being by me first deposes and says: 1. That he/she is the owner, or the legal representative of the owner, submitting the accompanying application for a public hearing as required by the Code of the City of Miami, Florida. affecting the real property located in the City of Miami, as described and listed on the foregoing pages of this affidavit and made a part thereof. 2. That all owners which he/she represents, if any, have given their full and complete permission for him/her to act in his/her behalf for the street closure as set out in the accompanying petition, ❑ including responding to day to day staff inquires; O not including responding to day to day staff inquiries in which case he/she should be contacted at c/o. Gilberto Pastoriza, Esq., 2665 S. Bayshore Drive, Suite 420, Miami, Florida 33133. 3. That the foregoing pages are mage a part of this affidavit contain the current names, mailing addresses, telephone numbers and legal descriptions for the real property of which he/she is the owner or legal representative. 4. The facts as represented in the application and documents submitted in conjunction with this affidavit are true and correct. Further Affiant/sayeth not. BAYWATCH APA MENTS, INC. e v5 U. a* e L ,. Applicant Name Applican - Signature STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE The f regoing/in�str�umerI� wad acknoWledg before me this dally of , 20 ,` , by � V • mit &-jev, A;i 7 'r - of Baywatch Apartments, Inc. a Florida corporation, on behalf of the corporation. HelShe is personally known to me or has produced �� - as identification an who did (did not) take An oath. (Stamp) S' nature 4RRALERO �. • ; D�70e21 Atut. at Notary MARIA A. CARRALERO Notary Public C�'19,2M5 is 2' uaL180 M. gonded 3; Vlt!' na, Nota A 03- 886 OWNER'S LIST Owner's Name Baywatch Apartments, Inc., c/o Gilberto Pastoriza, Esq. Mailing Address 2665 S. Bayshore Drive, #420, Miami, FL Zip Code 33133 Telephone Number (305)854-0800 Legal Description: Lot 4 Block 8 MIRAMAR SUBDIVISION recorded in Plat Book 5 Page 4 of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida Owner's Name Mailing Address Zip Code Telephone Number Legal Description: Owner's Name Mailing Address Zip Code Telephone Number Legal Description: Any other real estate property owned individually, jointly, or severally (by corporation, partnership or privately) within 500 feet of the subject site is listed as follows: Street Address Legal Description None Street Address Legal Description Street Address Legal Description Rev. 03/27/03 4 03- 886 DISCLOSURE OF OWNERSHIP 1. Legal description and street address of subject real property: Lot 4, Block 8, of MIRAMAR SUBDIVISION, recorded in Plat Book 5, Page 4, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida, a/k/a 1770 N. Bayshore Drive, Miami, Florida. 2. Owner(s) of subject real property and percentage of ownership. Note: The Code of the City of Miami requires disclosure of all parties having a financial interest, either direct or indirect, in the subject matter of a presentation, request or petition to the City Commission. Accordingly, question #2 requires disclosure of shareholders of corporations, beneficiaries of trusts, and/or any other interested parties, together with their addresses and proportionate interest. Baywatch Apartments, Inc., wholly owned by J.V. Suarez (owner of the property) MJF Construction Corp., wholly owned by Juan Carlos Menendez (contract purchaser) 3. Legal description and street address of any real property (a) owned by any party listed in answer to question #2, and (b) located within 500 feet of the subject real property. None Gilberto Pastoriza Attorney for Owner Name STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE 20_V� , by Cg--;. C7;4�5o \ 4 ersonall�_v�cn to me or who has produced who—did (did not) take an oath. (Stamp) Attorney for Owner Sign me this day of who is an individual as identification and OFFICL4i NOTARYSFAL M"ZYN SOMODEVNAA NOTARY PMUC STATE OF RMMA COMMISSION NO. CCSWW MY COMMSSION EXP. SEPT 13,2001 ' .` NISI WNW f JUL -- tt,_ fiAR-t�-3�'t92t� t fi 'w' R .1 819610 134 This instrument prepared by and return to: Ilmharntel Pam, Esq. - 2121 Ponce de 10M Blvd., #920 Coral Gables, FL 33134 FOLIO NO. 0132 31 003 OW 9SR351755 1998 ,i;f! 30 DOCSIPDEE 6#600.00 filrx 4:9to.Ot1 HARVEY MIN? CLitlii DACE COUNT? ► r;- This _ This indenture raids 8ds L4 day of ?OI.N , ION between TRU•KEY ENTERPRISES. INC • a Ronda Caporagan, GRANTOR of 8615 NW 00 Street 8214, Alarm. FL 33125 and BAYWATCH APARTMENTS, INC. a Florida Corporation. GRANTEE of 1770 North Bayoore Oda. Miami, FL 33122. WITNESSITH, that the Grantor. for and in oonsiderabon of the sum of S 10-M and eller good and vakrable eonsideraltons. lira receipt whereof fs hat ft adatowfedged. haaby g ants. barwft. sNk moans, remises. releases. conveys. and oonfrtms unto the Grantor, a8 that caftan IsM. souate, lyb,g and being in the County of Dade, State of Rtorida, to -wit. Lot 4, Blodt 8. MIRAMAR. AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF MIAMI, acow0l; to the Plat ftreof as reeorded to Plat Bock S. at Pape 4, of the Public Recoros of DADE Carry. Florida. SUBJECT TO TAXES FOR THE YEAR ION fitOT YET DUE AND PAYABLE; SUBJECT TO ALL CONDITIONS EASEMENTS, RESTRICTIONS AND UMNTATIONS OF RECORD, IF ANY, FOLIO -NO. AND dee Grwdm hwWW covenants *a acid grafts that the grantors are tWuly seized of said land in fee simple; that the grantors haute good right and lawful sumatty to ad and convey said land, that the ghafors hereby fully warrants, the tit to said mind and wee defend the same agairut tw lawful claims of all persons whonnaaevec, IN WITNESS WHEREOF, tie grantor has :tarounto set Granror s hand and seal lids dry and year &W above wrilten. Signed. seated, and delivered in presence of CITY OF MIAMI y CCOUUNNTYO1:'LO Ems. P1 )� = TR•KEY ENTERPRISES, INC., a Florida Corporabon MARCEL CAPD President The foregoing infkYnlent was adutowledged beton ate on thin I_t__ day of XQ%41998 by MARCEL CAPO. Pisaidtf of Tru -Key F-nWpdm. Int. a Florida Corporation. on What of the Corpo.-aeon. Personally known to me to be Ilia person who exoMe the tengoktg n uum*nt or who las Produced the Wowkq form of rdanblrcahon of due sbova-nsnW Person: p '* S t t &j2_^ and that an 0M was taken Vftess my nand and oMFcial seal on this M . Wpy o`r'S�y Li ,1698. DAVID SL1Ck M 7WrAPY NOTARY PUBLIC - Side of s MW -IC STATE OF FLO-RIV. 1 Coxxtw!ON NCL Ccamb1 Re=d and re= to: tSYCC t'r;a..Ov--r R. e,r - David Slachter, P.n. .t:w•. rte.. r �....:.. WPWO 10Ew Balm Foe: #105 p,yXr;p„v*r,hd`'A Coral Gables, FL 33014 J1fcO�D K�� HARVEY RIMN r � •a e �•✓ � ftp' •l. �. d��pi�"��it��'t�y}j��=' .... � > _ �.•: c••W ar moi•,' � • 03- 886