Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutOMNI-CRA-R-00-0053RESOLUTION NO. OMNI/CRA R-00-53 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ("CRA") AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE CRA TO SELECT THE LOWEST BIDDER ("LOWEST BIDDER") TO THE REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS ("RFQ") FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF PHASE I(A) AND/OR PHASE I(B) OF MARGARET PACE PARK AND FURTHER AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR TO ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH THE LOWEST BIDDER TO COMMENCE CONSTRUCTION. WHEREAS, the City of Miami approved and adopted the Omni Area Redevelopment Plan pursuant to Resolution Nos. 86-868 and 86-607 (the "Redevelopment Plan"); and WHEREAS, the CRA is responsible for carrying out community redevelopment activities and projects in the Omni Redevelopment Area (the "Redevelopment Area") established pursuant to the Redevelopment Plan; and WHEREAS, the CRA desires to authorize the Executive Director to select the Lowest Bidder to the RFQ for the construction of Phase I(A) and/or Phase I(B) of Margaret Pace Park and further authorizing the Executive Director to enter into an agreement with the same Lowest Bidder to commence construction. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. The recitals and findings contained in the Preamble to this Resolution are incorporated herein as if fully set forth in this Section. Section 2. The Board of Directors of the CRA hereby authorizes the Executive Director to select the Lowest Bidder to the RFQ for the construction of Phase I(A) and/or Phase I(B) of Margaret Pace Park. Section 3. The Board of Directors of the CRA hereby authorizes the Executive Director to enter into an agreement with the Lowest Bidder to commence on construction on Phase I(A) and/or Phase I(B) of Margaret Pace Park. Section 4. The resolution shall be effective upon its adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED on this 201h day of November, 2000, Arthur E. Teele, Jr., Chairman ATTEST: Walter J. Foeman, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: Holland & Knight LLP CRA Legal Counsel MIA1 #1056750 vI ITEM 4 OMNI/CRA RESOLUTION 0 NO. OMNI/CRA i „pis A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ("CRA") AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR TO SELECT THE LOWEST BIDDER TO THE RFQ FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF PHASE I(A) AND PHASE I(B) FOR MARGARET PACE PARK AND FURTHER AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR TO ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH THE SAME LOWEST BIDDER TO COMMENCE CONSTRUCTION. WHEREAS, the City of Miami approved and adopted the Omni Area Redevelopment Plan pursuant to Resolution Nos. 86-868 and .86-607 (the "Redevelopment Plan"); and WHEREAS, the CRA is responsible for carrying out community redevelopment activities and projects in the Omni Redevelopment Area (the "Redevelopment Area") established pursuant to the Redevelopment Plan and WHEREAS, the CRA desires to authorize the Executive Director to select the lowest bidder to the RFQ for the construction of Phase I(A) and Phase I(B) for Margaret Pace Park and further authorizing the Executive Director to enter into an agreement with the same lowest bidder on either Phase I(A), Phase I(B) or both Phase I(A) and Phase I(B) to commence construction. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. The recitals and findings contained in the Preamble to this Resolution are incorporated herein as if fully set forth in this Section. Section 2. The Board of Directors --of the CRA hereby to authorizes the Executive Director to select the lowest bidder to the RFQ for the construction of Phase I(A) and Phase I(B) for Margaret Pace Park. Section 3. The Board of Directors of the CRA hereby authorizes the Executive Director to enter into an agreement with the same lowest bidder on either Phase I(A), Phase I(B) or both Phase I(A) and Phase I(B) to commence construction on Phase I(A) and Phase I(B) for Margaret Pace Park. Section 4. The resolution shall be effective upon its adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED on this 20th day of November, 2000. ITEM 4 OMNI/CRA • ATTEST: Walter J. Foeman, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: Holland & Knight LLP CRA Legal Counsel 0 Arthur E. Teele, Jr., Chairman OrWicRA. 0 0 - 53 CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM Chairman Teele and November 6, 2000 Members of the CRA Board DATE SUBJECT: Margaret Pace Park FROM: Dlpak M. Parekh REFERENCES: Executive Directo ENCLOSURES: Resolution ITEM 4 FILE: RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the CRA Board of Directors approve the attached resolution authorizing the Executive Director to select the lowest bidder for the construction of Phase I(A) and Phase I(B) for the Margaret Pace Park. BACKGROUND A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the CRA authorizing the Executive Director to select the lowest bidder for Phase I(A) and Phase I(B)for Margaret Pace Park, and further authorizing the Executive Director enter in an agreement with the lowest bidder on either Phase I(A), Phase I(B) or both Phase I(A) and Phase I(B) and start construction. The proposed funding is delineated below: Revenue Sources Florida Inland Navigation District Grant (FIND) $ 161,995 Safe Neighborhood Park Bond Funds (SNBP) —1997 123,850 Safe Neighborhood Park Bond Funds (SNBP) —1998 136,570 OMNI Tax Increment Fund (TIF) 1,129, 075 SEOPW-CRA General Fund Loan to OMNI * 341,342 $ 1,892, 832 Expenditure Phase 1 a $ 613,013 Phase 1 b 1,279, 819 $ 1,892, 832 Difference Note: * Pending a grant application to CDBG Loan package. Funding Source: OMNI Capital Projects Account Number: 689005.550012.6.860 OMNI/CRA,, 00- 0'3 1bl';5/'Lb17k� 1b:0t7 �CJ7bbtJJl�7 "«•' `r BERMELLO•AJAMIL & PARTNERS -INC A 11 t M I T L C 7 9 1t i • ! N N I R E E R I N F: • L A N R t N 0 t R T E R I DR N E 7 t i A LANDSCAPE A R C k I T E C T u N E October 24, 2000 Honorable Commissioner Johnny Winton City of Miami 3500 Pan American Drive Miami, Florida 330133 Dear Commissioxaer Winton: We appreciate the opportunity to brief you on the status of the construction plans for Margaret Pace Park. As we informed you, the plans are completed except that we have an unresolved issue dealing with the FEMA flood criteria as it relates to the bathrooms and the mechanical. room. These two elements impact the first phase of construction so we need to address them at this time, In a preliminary dry run with the City Buil&g Department, it was pointed out that the bathrooms and -the mechanical rooms were located within an VE11 flood zone and as such buildings are required to be elevated on piers so in the event of a flood water can flow unobstructed through the site. The existing grade in the park is 5 feet 6 inches on average. B&,A.'s grading plan proposes to bring Ns elevation at the location of the bathrooms and mechanical room at 6 feet 9 inches. To meet the requirement of the VE11 flood zone the finish floor elevation of these buildings will need to be elevated 5 feet 3 inches to reach the requirement elevation of 12 feet (bottom of beam is required to be at 11 feet). This new design will result in the following: 1. Since the buildings will need to be elevated this will create an approximate 4 feet 3 inches of crawl space under the buildings. We can propose that this crawl space be screened with a metal grille that can allow the water through it but this space may create a public safety issue. Even with a heavy and well installed grille the crawl space may become an attraction to vagrants which will result in a maintenance and safety hazard for the park. Throughout the design process of the park, the Omni Advisory Board, the Parks Department, the City's Police Department and the CRA have required that the design solutions take into consideration public safety. As such we have employed CPTFD (Crime Prevention Thorough Environmental Design) principles in the design, of the park. The situation of a crawl space potentially being used by vagrants or others, in our estimation poses a violations to these safety principles, *2001 SOUTH RAYSHORE DRIVE • 10TH FLOOR • MIIAMI. FL $3133 -,USA . 1-305.859-2059 • FAX 1.305-969.9636 Www.ONml�ml,goRl Agp610l12 • EAp16aW u:uoaltet •Iaeeooe,o OMIT][/CRA _ J ii�/:�5/'1bbf� 1b:51� �L��tfOC13(�7 DO(" FL-"IVI.L11a Comnuss,loner Johnny Winton Margaret pace Park October 24, 2000 Page 2 2_ The buildings, and in particular the bathrooms, will need to be elevated to have a finished floor elevation of 5 feet 3 inches above grade, this necessitates the installation of a ramp to meet ADA requirements . The minimum length of the ramp will need to be 66 feet plus 15 feet of landing for a resulting distance of 81 feet. This length of the ramp will be cumbersome and not easily accessible or traveled by the handicapped or for that matter small children and the elderly. It is not advisable to make reaching the bathrooms any more of a challenge that it is absolutely necessary. We would look for relief in meeting the FEMA criteria in this case based on equal, and easy accessibility for all the community. 3. The cost of the building will increase anywhere from 20°/a to 50%. As we explained the CRA has established a phasing plan since the park does not have all funds available for all phases. This additional cost may preclude the CRA from building the restroom which has been a programmatic requirement from the community for years. It is advisable to include a restroom facility in an 8.5 acre park for the comfort of the community and the general maintenance of the park. 4. From an aesthetic standpoint, the only structures that will be required to be elevated are the restrooms and the mechanical room. They will have an overall height of 26 feet 8 inches as opposed to the proposed 21 feet 5 inches. The restroom which is now located centrally adjacent to the entrance pergola and one of the picnic pavilions, if elevated will visually alter the character of the site with the restroom becoming the dominant feature Winstead of the entrance pergola. We have discussed these options with CRA, staffand have identified the following courses of action: 1. pursue a variance to the FEMA requirements from the City Building Official. This is not a variance that is given, easily but given the handicapped accessibility issues and the public safety issues the City maybe able to evaluate the variance request in the light of this undue hardship. ,cos you pointed out we would be requesting the variance for a mechanical building and for bathrooms so there are certainly no life safety issues involved. 2. Elevate the buildings as per the FEMA requirements. This will require a design change and would trigger all the impacts discussed above. 3. Discard the batbrooms from the plan but still the issue will remain for the mechanical room. We appreciate your assistance and support in pursuing the variance from the FEMA requirements. Even though there is a process to request a variance which we will follow, we understand that it is a difficult variance to obtain. OMNIICRA. rN 0-3 lbl,'L5/'Lbb17 lb: DU JuDobuit0i oaw r�riti7tvu .axi i . Commissioner Johnny Winton Margaret Pace Park October 24, 2000 Page 3 Please let me know if you require any further information on the specifics of the design of the park. We will await your reply to set up a meeting with the City Building Official to proceed with a request for a variance. Sincerely, Tere C. G to Partner cc: Chairman Arthur E. Teele, CRA Dipak Parekh, CRA Mafia Perez, City of Miami Parks Deparftnmt a C 0 � C�t#� of iami, JFIori ra all �ZY of INCONP .�OHNNY L. WINTON O e=vcONApq COMMISSIONER October 5, 2000 Dipak Parekh Executive Director City of Miami Community Redevelopment Agency 300 Biscayne Boulevard Way Suite 430 Miami, FL 33131 Dear Mr. Parekh: P.O. BOX 330708 MIAMI, FL 33233-0708 (305) 250-5333 FAX (305) 579-3334 The renovation and redevelopment of Margaret Pace Park is of great concern to me. As the City Commissioner of the Omni area and a CRA Board member, I have a keen interest in seeing the Pace Park Project completed as quickly as possible. Earlier this summer, my staff and I met with staff of the CRA and members of the Omni Advisory Board to reach a consensus on the design of the Park. After some revisions in mid June, the Omni Advisory Board endorsed the plans that were created by Bermello Ajamil and Partners. On June 26`h the plans were presented to the CRA board and were approved. It is now mid -October, three months since everyone signed off on the plan, and there has been no apparent action to get this project moving forward. We were originally told the bids would go out in September. I would appreciate it if you would let me know what obstacles are preventing this project from moving forward. I would like to know what is being done to overcome those obstacles and when this project will begin construction. Additionally, I would appreciate a revised report on phasing plans for the park and a timeline for actions to be taken. If there is anything I can do to help kick this project into high gear, please let me know. Sincerely, A// p` J y L. Winton strict 2 Commissioner Cc: Arthur E. Teele SOURCES OF FUNDS Florida inland Navigation District Grant (FIND) Safe Neighborhood Park Bond Funds (SNBP) Tax Increment Financing (TIF) Additional Funds to be Provided TOTAL SOURCES OF FUNDS iE OF REQUIRED FUNDS RECONSTRUCTION COSTS Design, and Engineering Fees Construction Documents Bidding and Negotiation Construction Administration TOTAL PRECONSTRUCTION COSTS CONSTRUCTION PHASES 1 AND 2 COSTS Phase 1A Mobilization Demolition Shoreline Stabilization de Grading .orm Water Management Hater Systems \Sanitary Systems �3ctric 15% Contingency TOTAL PHASE 1A Margaret Pace Park Design Development Phasing Budget Total Additional Total Source and Use GRANTS AvailableTax Available Funds to be Required of Funds FIND SNBP 97 SNBP 98 Increment * Funds Provided Funding $161,995 $161,995 $161,995 $0 $161,995 $298,600 $137,400 $161,200 $298,600 $0 $298,600 0 $1,200,000 $1,200,000 $1,200,000 $0 $1,200,000 $1,254,820 $1,254,820 $1,254,820 $2,915,415 $161,995 $137,400 $161,200 $1,200,000 $1,660,595 $1,254,820 $2,915,415 $107,735 $0 $7,700 $16,190 $83,845 $107,735 $0 $107,735 $7,250 $0 $0 $0 $7,250 $7,250 $0 $7,250 $29,575 $0 $5,850 $8,440 $15,285 $29,575 $0 $29,575 $144,560 $0 $13,550 $24,630 $106,380 $144,560 $0 $144,560 $88,500 $0 $0 $0 $88,500 $88,500 $0 $88,500 $20,340 $7,500 $0 $0 $12,840 $20,340 $0 $20,340 $157,500 $75,000 $0 $71,030 $11,470 $157,500 $0 $157,500 $62,565 $10,700 $0 $0 $51,865 $62,565 $0 $62,565 $29,000 $0 $0 $0 $29,000 $29,000 $0 $29,000 $31,900 $0 $0 $0 $31,900 $31,900 $0 $31,900 $7,000 $0 $0 $0 $7,000 $7,000 $0 $7,000 $136,250 $6,100 $72,900 $0 $57,250 $136,250 $0 $136,250 $533,055 $99,300 $72,900. $71,030 $289,825 $533,055 $0 $533,055 $79,958 $0 $0 $0 $79,958 $79,958 $0.$79,958 $613,013 $99,300 $72,900 $71,030 $369,783 $613,013 $0 $613,013 As shown on the approved FY 1999-2000 CRA Budget of September, 1999 All grant funds are available to be spent now. The Safe Neighborhood Bond Program 1997 funds need to be spent by December 2000. The Safe Neighborhood Bond Program 1998 funds need to be spent by December 2001. The Florida Inland Navigation District funds need to be spent by October 1, 2001. A one year extension possible. 11/09/00: 10:34:20 AM 1 T:\FS2\Lands\Landplan\Landplan\CRA\MPACE.BUDGET 4(Judy).123 Phase I Site Paving & Walls Pergola Two Tennis Courts & Lighting for Four Courts Interim Volleyball Courts Tennis Pavilion Basketball & Lighting ita Course ccer Equipment og Run Security Building Site Lighting Site Furniture Irrigation System Landscape (Trees, Sod) 15% Contingency Phase 2 Site Paving Two Tennis Courts Aftay Equipment strooms Recreation Pavilions *Site Furnitureigation System ndscape (Trees, Sod) 15% Contingency TOTAL PHASE I TOTAL PHASE 1A & 1B TOTAL PHASE 2 TOTAL PHASES 1 & 2 AND PRECONSTRUCTION Margaret Pace Park Design Development Phasing Budget Total Additional Total Source and Use GRANTS AvailableTax Available Funds to be Required of Funds FIND SNBP 97 SNBP 98 Increment * Funds Provided Funding $266,692 $15,545 $0 $0 $251,147 $266,692 $0 $266,692 $104,454 $0 $0 $0 $104,454 $104,454 $0 $104,454 $75,000 $0 $0 $0 $75,000 $75,000 $0 $75,000 $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $10,000 $10,000 $0 $10,000 $49,280 $0 $0 $0 $49,280 $49,280 $0 $49,280 $37,500 $0 $0. $0 $37,500 $37,500 $0 $37,500 $30,000 $0 $0 $25,000 $5,000 $30,000 $0 $30,000 $5,000 $0 $0 $0 $5,000 $5,000 $0 $5,000 $3,000 $0 $0 $0 $3,000 $3,000 $0 $3,000 $11,000 $0 $0 $0 $11,000 $11,000 $0 $11,000 $101,250 y $0 $50,950 $0 $37,242 $88,192 $13,058 $101,250 $25,000 $3,200 $0 $16,000 $5,800 $25,000 $0 $25,000 $129,600 $0 $0 $0 $35,000 $35,000 $94,600 $129,600 $265,110 $43,950 $0 $24,540 $0 $68,490 $196,620 $265,110 $1,112,886 $62,695 $50,950 $65,540 $629,423 $808,608 $304,278 $1,112,886 $166,933 $0 $0 $0 $94,414 $94,414 $72,519 $166,933 $1,279,819 $62,695 $50,950 $65,540 $723,837 $903,022 $376,797 $1,279,819 $1,892,832 $161,995 $123,850 $136,570 $1,093,620 $1,516,035 $376,797 $1,892,832 $47,681 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $47,681 $47,681 $40,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $40,000 $40,000 $50,950 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $50,950 $50,950 $163,800 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $163,800 $163,800 $304,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $304,000 $304,000 $87,067 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $87,067 $87,067 $20,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $20,000 $20,000 $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $50,000 $50,000 $763,498 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0. $763,498 $763,498 $114,525 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $114,525 $114,525 $878,023 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $878,023 $878,023 $2,915,415 $161,995 $137,400 $161,200 $1,200,000 $1,660,595 $1,254,820 $2,915,415 ' As shown on the approved FY 1999-2000 CRA Budget of September, 1999 All grant funds are available to be spent now. The Safe Neighborhood Bond Program 1997 funds need to be spent by December 2000. The Safe Neighborhood Bond Program 1998 funds need to be spent by December 2001. The Florida Inland Navigation District funds need to be spent by October 1; 2001. A one year extension possible. M 0 11/09/00: 10:34:21 AM 2 T:\FS2\Lands\Landplan\Landpfan\CRA\MPACE.BUDGET 4(Judy).123 1 Margaret Pace Park Phase 1A and 1B 1118100 fD 1 Task Name Phase 1A and 1 B Duration 278 days Start Wed 11/81DO Finish Fri 11/30/01 Oct'00 Nov'00 10/110/8 0/1 0/2 0/2 11/5 1/1 1/1 ------------- ��--��-------�--� -- �---�-- �---�---'-�-�--�---�--�---�--•- . ; ; ; ; ; ; ; --- - ---'---i-- �---; --i-vi-- �---�-'-ti--- ; � � � � � � - Dec'00 Jan'01 Feb'01 Mar'01 A r'01 Ma '01 Jun '01 Jul'01 Au 'Ot Se 101 Oct'01 Nov'Ot 1/2 12/3 2/1 2/1 2/2 2/3 1/7 1/141/211/28 2/4 2/11 /182/25 3/4 3/113/18 /25 4/1 4/8 15 22 129 5/6 13 0 27 6/3 10 /17 /24 7/1 7/8 /157/22 /29 8/5 /12 /19 28 9/2 9/9 /16 /23 /3010/7 0/1 0/2 0/2 11/4 1/1 1/1 1/2 ------- - ------ ------ -- - ------ ----• ----- -- --- - -- -- --- -- -- -- ------ - --- ------ ---- ------ ------ - --- -- --- - -- -- --- -- --- - -- -- --- - .. - ..- = ---- --- -- ............ -- -- -- - --- -- --- -- ----- ----- ------ - - ---------- - - -- - ---- -- - - -- --- - --- - - ------ -- -- - -- -- - -- - - -- - - -- --- -- -- -- --- ------ ----- - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --- -- - - —^^ -- 1/5 - ------ -- ------ -r--'---'--- � � � �:...:......::.:.::.... - ------- ------ -- - ------ -- ----------- ------ --- - --- - - - --------- - --- ------ --- ---- ---- ------ - ---- ----- -- - - 1/26 - .. - - - - - - - - - -- - - -- ! - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . "' . - . --•----------- -- -- -- --- - --- - 3 Complete drawings Phase to 13 days Wed 1118/00 Fri 11/24/00 4 Complete drawings Phase 1B 23days Wed11/8/00 - Fri12/8/00 5 Advertise project 10 days Mon 1214/00 Fri 12/15/00 6 Pick up drawings Iday Mon12111/00 Mon 12111/00 7 Building permit processing 20days Mon 12/11/00 Frit/5/01 8 Bidding 20 days Mon 12/11/00 Fri 1/5/01 9 Bid due date 0 days Fri 1/5/01 Fri 115/01 10 Bidevalualionandnegoliation 15days Mont/8/01 Fri1/26/01 11 Bid award 0 days Fri 1/26/01 Fri 1/26/01 12 Mobilization 10 days Mon 1/29/01 Fri 2/9/01 13 Construction -Phase 1A 80 days Mon 2/12/01 Fri 6/1/01 14 Construction - Phase 1 B 120 days Mon 6118/01 Fri 11/30/01 • Thu 11/9/00 1 9:58 AM OIVM/CRA BASKETBALL COURT I I , , ENTRANCE PLAZA PLAYGROUND i MAIN ENTRANCE PLAZA PROPOSED STREET SECONDARY ENTRANCE(]-- SPECIALTY PAVEMENT i� MEMENT PLAY EQUIPMENT 0 1 1 ❑ SPECIALTY PAVEMENT 0 i 1AVEMENT DRINKING FOUNTAIN I H• II (] ART MOSAIC PAVEMENT ENTRANCE WALLS �JJ NG SEATING WALLS W i 0 PARK HOUSE BIKE RACK O I IF i LS SEATING AREA O e I (] TRELLIS MAINTENANCE/SECURITY Q • ° e BIKE RACK fj i *' , SEATING WALLS VEHICULAR ACCESS / T lJ.l I 0 BIKE RACK DRINKING FOUNTAIN , ° "TT= _i • Z I I ❑ DRINKING FOUNTAIN I ' I I 0 MAINTENANCE/SECURITY • �^ 1 VEHICULAR ACCESS •{�9E'ATN•OW/LKiNT __-__ --------- "---- I e o L___________________ FD(TINiE ENT7iANCE .�•1 �--- !` .AND 3ARBA(IE RECEPTACLE, TVP. LIGHT FDnVRE. Typ. NORTH BAYSHDRE DRIVE SOOCEA * - rw1 • .. ENTRANCE a, R •. ° • ♦ ° d SEATING. TYP. jn s � ° • �`..�', Q� • M � / /� 3HT BERM •- • --__ • i''T �..'1'. r ° /� C9ICKET FIELD °' a i � ° �' � ;'1. w Esc • • � .y "LLL111 WIDE CONCRETE PATH, TYP. x • • 2""L LI i/ • • • � • ° • • � •••• q ° • .. _ ° -- _ . b ° • � ° _ ,�• a od _ • d j r • ► ' ail W ,.1 y ' . • :','�};' , . • e • �O ``' `ups ' �� ... ,�_ •••1+;• . �� • • o • • • •. - _ ...� FITNESS ....�� .. ° ♦ r •.1 • S TATKIN TYF TENNIS COURTS]— PLAYGROUND— BAYSHORE PLAZA �—©CIRCULATION NODE, TYP. ART THRONE PLAZA, TYP. PICNIC TABLE 10' IT HT. FENCE ❑ PLAYING BERM ❑ ❑ SPECIALTY PAVEMENT 0 SPECIALTY PAVEMENT ART THRONE W/BARBACUE GRILL, TYP. TRELLIS W/BENCHES ❑ SEATING AREA Q 0 - Q ART MOSAIC PAVEMENT ❑ SEATING WALLS COLOR CONCRETE PAVEMENT DRNKING FOUNTAIN ❑ SPECIALTY PAVEMENT p BISCAYNE SAY ❑ SEATING LIGHTS ❑ () BIKE RACK OI !.` 05 3 MARGARET PACE PARK MASTERPLAN201 10 50' SCALE 1'.40'.0' MIAMII,FLORIDA ®NORTH SITE PLAN & PAR LO• PARTNERS-INC JLINIE 1p9Q B PARTNERS•IIL • a;4o We.pNwN,. DESIGN DEVELOPMENT TAN 17 PAW 1 F,: 79 FP Hn I ANTI—KN T rHT Tn 9_3GiSR5R1 F,1 R P. AP/M 1.ew ONiCeS ,L7 PXMGHTTLP AUanm f♦aihem Yiryina ,�j,Boston Ormnda Chcapo S: Petrsburo 701 WWII Avenue, Suite W Fort Laudefte San Antonio P.O. Box 015441 (IIP 33101-5441) Jadcso milt Son Fencisco M>emi, FiOrW33131 - LWIM 2 pie Los Angela Tallahassee .305-374-6500 ktiboume Tamps FAX 305.7B94M MEN awlinptat o.C, WWWAlac om NOW YO West Palm 8W In"Ids lalll= Eck TMt January 17, 2001 wn.LLA z R luL.00w 305-789.7712 Internet Address: wbIoon4hkI&w.cam via Fax ao&8gs-mo Mr. Walter Foeman City Clerk 3500 Pan American Drive Miami, Florida 88133 Re: Community Redevelopment Agrency Dear Walter: This letter is in accordance with our telephone conversation this day regarding various resolutions. With respect to Omni Resolution Omni R=00=53]approved on November 20, 2W0 regarding Margaret Chase Park, this letter confirms that I made a non - substantive change in the Resolution to reflect that the Board approved the Executive Director accepting the lowest gualffied bid, since this non -substantive change reflects the iuteut of the Board when the Resolution was pa*t. With respect to Southeast Uvertown/Fark West Resolution SEOPW R-00- 120 regarding the Simmons property, this letter cnnfirme that T madP A nnn- substantive change in the text of the Resolution to reflect that Exhibit "A" described the property and not thtr Purchase Agreement since the sentence was not grammatically correct and Exhibit "A" in fact contained the legal description of the property. This is a non -substantive change. With respect. to Southeast Overtown/Park West Resolution SEOPW Rr00- 109 uppruved at the November 20te meeting, this letter confirms Char, I Made a non -substantive change authorizing the Executive Director to accept the lowest .TAN 17 Pffl l 1 f, : *39 FP Hni I AND -KNIGHT Tn g7ASRSR 1 F.1 A P . M/M Mr. Walter Foeman y January 17, 2001 Page 2 qualified bid which was the intent of the Board when the Resolution was past. This revision is a non -substantive change. With respect to Southeast Overtown/Fark West Resolution SEOPW R-00- 133 involving the Ward Rooming House which was approved at the December, 2000 CRA Board Meeting, this letter confirms that I revised the Resolution to reflect the modification approved by the Budrd reeL -ting the CRA from spending additional funds with respect to the property other than those funds required to secure the property without further Board action. Please contact me should you have any questions. cc: Mr. Dipak Parekh WRB\akl MTA1 ii1lit AIPI vt Very truly yours, HOLLAND & KNTC-IFT T.,T,P William R. Blnom ** TOTAL PAGE.03 ** TAN 17 ?AVI I 1 f, : 7R FP Hn I ANTI—KN 1 GHT Law Ofaoes HOLLAND A , GHT I LLP, 701 Brickell Avenue Suite 3000 P.O. Box 01bA41 (ZIP 33101-5441) Miami, Florida 38131 305-874-8300 FAX 306-799-77" FACSRVHLE TO: Tn 9705RSR1F1 Gi :F 01 /M 0;Wanta . Northern Virginia Boston Orlando Bradenton Psvmidem Chiespo San Antonio Fort Lauderdale Sae t raucNoo Jackaoaville Seattle Lakeland St. Petersbure LAs Angeles TaDahasaee Melbourne Tamps Miami Wwhin&r6 D.C. New York WeApalm Beach gae„e a;.c.• Tal nvnr Me3dW City "sq_ Ta r If you did not receive all of the pages or find that they Mr. Walter Fuemun City Clerk are illegible, please call NAME COMPANYMIRM (805) 3744WO Miami Florida GITy STATE 806-868-1630 FAA NUMBER TELEPHONE NUMBER FROM: CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE; This facsimile, along with any William It, Bloom 305-799-7712 documents. files, or attachments, NAME TELEPHONE NUMBER way contain information that is confidential privileged. or otherwise exempt from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, or a person rftponsible for delivering it to TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES (Including Cover Sheet) the iatezAed recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, printing. distribution or use MESSAGE, of any information contained in or attached to this facsimile is STRICTLY FROHMITED. Iryuu have received this facsimile in error, ploaoo immediately notify uo by facsimile or by telephone collect at the nan►hen stated above, and destroy the original facsimile and its attachments without readinm printing, or saving in any manner. Your cooperation is appreciated. Thank you. FOR TM RECORD: DATE: January 17, 2001 URGENCY: ❑ SUPER RUSH ❑ RUSH C REGULAR FAXED BY: AMOUNT: CLIENT V: 027387 MATTER*: 00098 CONFIRMED: ❑ 1ES n NO NAME: TIME: MLAl #1000164 v1