HomeMy WebLinkAboutBack-Up DocumentsMIAMI 21
TASK FORCE
Recommendations Report
I .IW mi l...a�7$ i'"'cl x "Ipn ■ -ro�y.� IT` _:
�a
n ° am%
�771
u ■
G: iJL;. Y
��
li.e LI
[' y Illll h. 1� x Y r +1• a I•I I'I F j I I I C l+
r4 : l-, I esu nRy iR.� - I�� I I'I•1191I I11 .R
��'- R�'� -� .� ■ f _ 'I •I •I •C I 1 1111'I' I
'I•I•I•F C 1 I I k 1+I�
C
I I'I'1 1 1 _ •4r'+.
__-.. Imo_ �n I3•ly1I'��
i I 4 �
h 11�
a am
sir
•
, � • •
SITE
CONTENTS
1
Executive Summary
Background
9
Overview of Review Topics
M
Recommendations and Implementation Strategy
A. Affordability
B. Climate Change and Resiliency
C. Quality of Life
D. Prosperity
E. Service
F. Assessment
A p p e f i d I C eS (Separate Document)
A. City Commission Resolutions
B. City Staff Briefing Notes
C. Map of City -Owned Properties
D. Information Related to Warrants
E. Information Related to Waivers
F. Information Related to LEED Certification
G. Discussion Comments and Associated Recommendations
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
In 2009, the City of Miami adopted the Miami 21 Zoning
Code ("Code"), transitioning from the previous
Euclidian type zoning code (11000) to a form -based
approach. The intent of the form -based code is to
foster more predictable built results and a high -
quality public realm by using physical form (rather
than separation of uses) as the organizing principle.
The Code aims to move toward a more pedestrian -
friendly City that supports transit -oriented growth,
and away from car prioritized development. The
Code was also intended to clarify and simplify the
review, permitting and public hearing processes
leading to increased consistency and predictably.
Since the Code's adoption more than 10 years ago,
individual amendments have been adopted almost
yearly adapting to everchanging conditions of a
developing City as well as clarifying and improving
its policies and procedures. Also, as provided for in
the Code, the City has adopted several Special Area
Plans (masterplans of properties 9 acres or more)
as well as created new Neighborhood Revitalization
Districts (meant to encourage revitalization of areas
of the City requesting such assistance). Although
the Code is credited with many successful outcomes
in managing Miami's rapid growth, new strategic
opportunities and challenges have also emerged
that need to be addressed. City Commission was
aware that the Code had not been comprehensively
reviewed since adoption and directed that the
City Administration serve as the liaison to a Task
Force charged to evaluate the Code and report to
the Commission any recommended amendments
(Resolution R-19-0523, Adopted December 19, 2019).
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report O
The Commission appointed twelve local professionals, developers, community
representatives, and electors to form the Miami 21 Task Force ("Task Force") which met
and collaborated in over 10 public meetings and workshops between January 2021 and
September 2021.
The Task Force provided their perspectives and proposed one hundred and eighty-
three (183) Recommendations focusing on six overarching topics: housing affordability
(83 recommendations); climate change and resiliency (28 recommendations); quality of
life (22 recommendations); prosperity (10 recommendations); service (33
recommendations); and assessment (7 recommendations). Many of the
recommendations respond to perceived deficiencies with the Code by identifying
process improvements, amending Code requirements to better reflect the form -based
approach, implementing a more thoughtful transition between transect zones, and
incorporating the unique characteristics of individual neighborhoods.
Working alongside Staff, the Task Force organized the recommendations into three
(3) timelines: short, medium and longer -term. Short-term items are generally clear
and specific amendments to the Code; while Medium -term items may require further
interdepartmental coordination, staff follow-up and/or higher -level analysis; and Longer -
term items may require additional studies, coordination with non -City agencies and/or
additional public outreach.
All the Task Force's recommendations have been organized by Topic and proposed
Implementation Timeline in the following pages of this Report.
_s W 1
0 MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report
2. BACKGROUND
PURPOSE OF THE
CITY OF MIAMI 21 ZONING CODE
Adopted in 2009, the City of Miami 21
Zoning Code ("Code") establishes standards
and procedures for new development or
redevelopment in the City of Miami ("City").
It also incorporates the Miami 21 Atlas, which
acts as the official Zoning Atlas of the City
and designates a Transect Zone for all lands
within the City.
At the time of adoption, the Code provided
an ambitious vision and plan for Miami. It
replaced the traditional Euclidian model of
planning with a new City-wide Form -Based
approach. Whereas the Euclidian model is
characterized by regulating land based on
use, Form -Based Zoning Codes regulate
development to achieve a specific urban
V_
4 "i-L. I ki
form. Form -Based Zoning Codes place an
emphasis on the relationship between the street and buildings, pedestrians and
vehicles, public and private spaces, and the relationship between multiple buildings,
a block, a neighborhood and transitions in scale. They create a predictable
public realm by controlling the physical form of private developments, with a
secondary focus on land use regulations.
The Form -Based approach includes the following objectives, among others:
• Mixed -use activities within buildings and blocks of the city —that are walkable
distances of offices and residences
• Promote walkability through a greater emphasis on the pedestrian spaces
• Promote transit by establishing nodes of greater intensity concentrations
u
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report
The longer -term outcomes of the Form -Based approach are widely recognized as
reducing or limiting the prevalence of:
• Suburban sprawl and bedroom communities
• Automobile -dependent, unsustainable development patterns characterized
by: long commuting times, automobile trips for daily tasks, large,
maintenance intensive streets built solely for cars, lack of public places,
industry outside the city, and excess parking
• Extreme, often unnatural, segregation of uses
• Excessive need for Special Districts to address areas which require
mixed uses or other zoning configurations outside the standard "uses"
Miami 21 is a holistic approach to land use and urban planning. It provides a vision
for the City that is supported by specific guidelines and regulations that consider
all the integral factors that make the City a unique, vibrant place to live, learn, work
and play. The vision espoused and implemented by the Code itself is subject to
debate, with many stakeholders expressing the view that the intent and goals of the
Code should be captured more carefully in the regulations. Other stakeholders, have
expressed the view that the characteristics of individual neighborhoods
should be studied separately and their unique attributes and needs reflected in
the Code.
aNR
� 1■M11111� ■ �
■ �II /� � 1■S■ 1■111 - ' ■
ML
liNE�
mm` n■`'--�
mmh� MEN
!Nt -
1� YY�■I YAEN-
===
■1 -■■■V --��■1 1�
■>s.n
ill 1■�■■■
0 MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report
REVIEW OF THE CODE
Since its adoption, the Code has been amended continuously, with updates varying
in degrees of significance. The City faces important development issues that require
strategic action, including provision of affordable housing, a response to the impacts
of climate change, continuing demand for development, and limited enforcement.
Considering these challenges, residents and stakeholders requested a broader
review of the Code.
Resolution R-19-0523 of the City Commission was adopted on December 12, 2019
directed that the City Administration report to the City Commission on the viability
of the Code, as amended. In doing so, the Administration was tasked with conducting
a comprehensive review of the Code Atlas, evaluating the Development Direction of
the City's neighborhoods, and report to the City Commission any recommendations,
changes, or actions that should be taken.
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE AND TIMELINE
December 12, 2019 - Resolution R-19-0523 also required the establishment of a
Task Force to work with the City Administration. They were tasked with giving their
perspective and recommendations for possible changes and measures to be taken
relative to the Code.
October 8, 2020 - Resolution R-20-0320 established the Miami 21 Task Force ("Task
Force") in October 2020. The twelve members comprised of Mayor and Commission
appointed local professionals, developers, community representatives, and electors.
They collaborated in more than 10 public meetings and workshops.
MIAMI 21 TASK FARCE Reco me
—.�-�. �dations Report
TASK FORCE MEMBERS:
Alisa Cepeda, Board Member/Dist. 5
Natalie Duran, Board Member/Dist. 3
Iris Escarra, Board Member/Dist. 5
Bernardo Fort -Brescia, Board Member/Dist. 1
Andrew Frey (Vice -Chairperson), Board Member/(Mayor)
Thorn Grafton, Board Member/Dist. 3
Kobi Karp, Board Member/Dist. 1
Vicky Leiva, Board Member/Dist. 4
Melissa Tapanes Llahues (Chairperson), Board Member/Dist. 4
Juan Mullerat, Board Member/(Mayor)
Adam Old, Board Member/Dist. 2
Nathanial Robinson, Board Member/Dist. 2
TASK FORCE MEETINGS AND TOPICS
•January 22, 2021 -Affordability
•March 8, 2021 - Climate Change and Resiliency
•March 29, 2021 - Quality of Life #1
•April 26, 2021 - Quality of Life #2
•May 24, 2021 - Prosperity & Service
•June 14, 2021 - Workshop #1 (Report Framework)
•June 28, 2021 - Assessment
•July 12, 2021 - Workshop #2 (Recommendation Specific Standards)
•July 26, 2021 - Outstanding Topic Discussion
•August 16, 2021 - Final Topics and Draft Report Meeting
• September 20, 2021 - Final Report Recommendation
0 MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report -
nnw�
3. OVERVIEW OF REVIEW TOPICS
CITY COMMISSION RESOLUTION R-19-0523
City Commission requested a comprehensive review of the Code at the December 12,
2019 meeting. During their consideration of the Resolution and in previous meetings,
the City Commissioners commented that it had been over ten years since passage of
Miami 21 and emphasized several concerns to be addressed in the review.
Commission highlighted affordable housing
as a crisis that needed to be addressed
immediately. Florida International University's
Jorge M. Perez Metropolitan Center
conducted a 2019 Market Study which found
that a significant number of renters within
the City are currently `cost burdened' and a
high proportion of residents are spending
more than thirty percent of their income
on housing. Commissioners asked if current
zoning regulations contribute to the housing
affordability crisis and if so, how they might
be amended.
Commissioners requested that the review consider the impact on low-income, and
minority neighborhoods, which they felt had been overlooked in past planning
work. For example, private applicants, public agencies, and staff had previously
proposed projects or solutions to the wider housing crisis within low-income areas,
avoiding the more prosperous single-family home neighborhoods. Some low-income
neighborhoods either hadn't benefited from projects as anticipated, or worse,
communities had been negatively impacted by high -density buildings near single-
family homes. Commission also considered potential displacement of residents as
aged housing is refurbished or replaced as an important topic of the code review.
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report o
The Mayor and City Commission
reiterated that they had declared
that the City is in a state of Climate
Emergency at the November 22,
2019 meeting. Considering the
state of emergency, Commission
requested thattheMiami21 revisions
should address the potential
consequences of climate change
and incorporate related resiliency
measures. The Urban Land Institute
2019 Report `Miami21: From Good
to Great, Adapting Miami's Form -
Based Code' also made similar
recommendations.
+,
F FSFF I 17
In addition to the broader themes _
of housing affordability and pp —
climate adaptation, Commissioners
highlighted several specific items.`
Commissioners acknowledged
benefits to the current high
demand for development across - t
the City, but commented on -
problems created when large buildings are located near neighborhoods of single-
family homes. Commissioners also requested that reviewers consider the
potential benefits of opportunity zones, supporting a tech economy and a
technology ecosystem across the City, the effectiveness of Special Areas
Plans, and parking requirements. Commissioners expressed support for
developing additional Neighborhood Master Plans and expansion of areas
which allow Accessory Dwelling Units.
Commissioners requested improvements in Planning Department processes
which will improve service and speed of reviews, but also additional scrutiny
of zoning changes. Commissioners suggested that the process of approving
"up -zoning" should require the support of a City Commission super majority
to ensure the impact on neighborhoods is properly considered.
0 MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report
REVIEW TOPICS
Planning staff organized the specific requests of the Commission into review topics.
The Task Force endorsed the grouping of topics with some amendments at the
first meeting.
AFFORDABILITY CLIMATE CHANGE QUALITY OF LIFE PROSPERITY
AND RESILIENCY
q0 AFFORDABILITY
SERVICE ASSESMENT
The Task Force considered housing affordability at the January 22, 2021 meeting and
further discussed and confirmed recommendations at the August 16, 2021 meeting.
The Task Force focused on the following elements:
• Accessibility, availability, and incentives for applicants to provide affordable housing
• How Area Median Income ("AMI") impacts supply and demand of market rate
housing
• Discrepancy between City and County AMI impact on affordable housing units
• Ancillary Dwelling Units ("ADUs")
• Gentrification and Displacement
• Effects on Income inequality
Cla CLIMATE CHANGE AND RESILIENCY
The Task Force discussed climate change, sustainability, and resilience at the March 8,
2021 meeting and confirmed their recommendations at the August 16, 2021 meeting.
The Task Force recommends potential amendments which will allow development
projects to incorporate adaptation and resiliency elements immediately and/
or provide flexibility for elements to be added in the future.
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report 0
(7a%QUALITY OF LIFE
The Task Force addressed ways to improve quality of life at the March 29,2021 and
April 26, 2021 meetings. The focus of the discussion included the following elements:
• Comprehensive review of the Miami 21 Zoning Atlas evaluating development
direction of city neighborhoods and "non -successional" abutting transects
• Review of accepted and adopted masterplans and neighborhood plans
• Development impact on minority communities
• Special Area Plan issues
• Parking requirements
• Preservation of single-family residential neighborhoods
W110-)PROSPERITY
The Task Force focused on prosperity at the May 24, 2021 meeting and confirmed
their recommendations at the August 16, 2021 meeting, which included:
• Effects on Transportation
• Creating Activity Nodes at major thoroughfare intersections.
• Opportunity Zones
• Incentivizing technology -based economy
• Effects on Education
SERVICE
The Task made recommendations to improve service at the May 24, 2021 meeting
including:
• Reducing processing time for permits
• Clarifying general issues and interpretation
• Improving navigability and usability of Miami 21 by stakeholders.
• Improving noticing and conducting quasi-judicial hearings
m MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report
a ASSESSMENT
The Task Force recommended continuously monitoring the outcomes and impact of
the Code by measuring:
• Whether the Code created more mixed -use and transitional zones on a city-wide
basis
• How effectively the Code interacts with Future Land Use Plan
• How the Code Atlas reflects City -owned owned properties
• Number of Warrants and Waivers since the Code has been in effect
Photo cYedit. J. `oznikov%,tter� �
iy
r If
its
�r It
live -
it
} a ■� o
1rAp
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report 0
4. RECOMMENDATIONS AND
IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY
Between January 2021 and September 2021, the Task Force collaborated to
identify one hundred and eighty-three (183) Recommendations, organized into
six review topics, which are identified using the following letters.
A. Affordability
B. Climate Change and Resiliency
C. Quality of Life
D. Prosperity
E. Service
F. Assessment
Many of the Recommendations include specific proposals for text amendments
to the Code, while others suggest follow-up work and additional studies.
HOW TO USE THIS DOCUMENT
a. Recommendations are organized into short, medium, or long-term elements using
the criteria outlined on the following page under "Implementation Strategy".
b. Each set of Recommendations begins by referencing the potentially affected
section(s) of the Code
Example: Article 7 (Definitions) Section 7.2
c. Each Recommendation includes a unique reference number. The first letter relates
to the topic, followed by a Recommendation number. The referencing also allows
readers to cross-reference the discussion comments in Appendix F.
Example: "C.1" refers to topic C. Quality of Life, Recommendation No. 1.
d. Suggestions that do not propose amendments to the Zoning Code, but relate to other
programs, initiatives, or City Ordinance changes, have been categorized as `Other'.
in MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report -
IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY AND SCHEDULE
Short -Term - In process within 60-90 days
• Clear, implementable recommendation from Task Force
• Requires minor text modification(s) to the Code
• Requires only administrative process with public input to implement
Medium -Term - In process within 180 days and yearly Progress Report thereafter
• Clear recommendation that requires some additional research or public
outreach/ input
• May require changes to the Comprehensive Plan (MCNP)
• May require Planning coordination with other City departments
Longer -Term - In process within 180 days and yearly Progress Report thereafter
• Requires multiple actions
• Requires additional in-depth studies / research
• Requires modification(s) to the Comprehensive Plan
• Requires modifications across different regulatory documents and/or coordination
with different agencies
• Requires comprehensive public process
Otner
• Instructions for other City (or non -City) departments or agencies
• Refers to other Code or Regulatory Documents (i.e. not an amendment to the
Code)
• Will require additional direction from City Commission if code amendments are
required.
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report In
1
Multiple national and local studies have documented Miami as one of the least
affordable cities in the country with residents paying a disproportionally high
percentage of their income on housing costs. In many neighborhoods housing costs
are already considered a crisis. While amending the Code will not solve this problem
on its own, Planning staff and stakeholders understand that updating the regulatory
process to support housing options across a wide range of price points is essential.
The Task Force examined ways to streamline the development process for affordable
housing by reducing unnecessary controls and increasing flexibility, when appropriate.
The Task Force also addressed ensuring that the unique character of existing
residential neighborhoods was strengthened and safeguarded. Please note that
some recommendations may apply primarily to housing produced with government
funded subsidies while other recommendations are directed toward increasing the
supply of affordable market -rate and naturally occurring affordable housing.
m MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report -
T 0
O AFFORDABILITY
The Task Force identified thirty-two recommendations that may be implemented
in the short-term to support housing affordability. These are considered clear
recommendations that only requires minor text modifications to the Code, public
input, and changes in administrative processes to implement.
Definitions
Updates and clarification of definitions.
Potential Sections of the Code to be amended:
Article 1 (Definitions) Section 1.2;
Article 3 (General to Zones) Section 3.14.3.a. (7)
A.1 Amend Affordable/Workforce Housing definitions to be clear and consistent
with US Housing and Urban development (HUD) and adjust individual incentives
based on target AMI. While incentives maybe targeted based on AMI, definitions
should be consistent.
A.2 Remove ambiguous and conflicting language from affordability related
definitions. For example, revise definitions to distinguish Affordable Workforce
Housing and Affordable Housing. Review more recent updates contained in
Appendix J-Wynwood NRD-1 and apply across Miami 21, as appropriate.
Parking and Loading
Reductions to the parking and loading requirements to facilitate affordability in the
creation of supply of all new housing products.
Article 3 (General to Zones) Section 3.6.3. Additional Off-street Parking Pegulations,
Section 3.75.5 and 3.76.4, Section 3.15.4.b & 3.16.3.b;
Article 4 (Standards and Tables) Table 4. Density, Intensity and Parking
and Table 5. Building Function: Parking and Loading.
A.3 Decrease parking requirements overall to support the general provision of
affordable housing.
A.4 Provide parking reductions for small affordable housing projects, as the
smaller the project the more burdensome the parking requirements.
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report
T 0
0 AFFORDABILITY
A.5 Allow parking reductions as of right for Affordable Housing projects.
A.6 Reduce 23' drive aisle standard to 20' ft minimum for 90 degrees angle; 17' ft
minimum for 60 degrees angle and 11'-12' ft minimum for 45 degrees angle, for
all types of projects.
A.7 Allow compact car parking space size. Miami Dade County standard of 7.5' ft x
15' ft up to a maximum of 75% of the parking spaces provided, for all types of
projects.
A.8 Allow delivery vehicles to externally maneuver into loading docks, and enforce
delivery hours, as internal maneuvering diminishes ground floor active uses;
remove apron and maneuverability requirements, for all types of projects.
(See Recommendation A.67 in `Other' category relating to the enforcement of
Delivery Hours by the Department of Street Parking "DOSP" also known as the
Miami Parking Authority).
A.9 Allow on -street loading up to a certain unit count. Must be dedicated loading
space.
A.10 Reduce loading requirements. Calculate loading requirements based on
habitable space rather than current gross area. Encourage on -street loading;
eliminate onsite loading in pedestrian -oriented streets except for large projects.
A.11 Allow centralized parking that affordable housing projects can utilize as "off -
site" parking.
A.12 Increase square footage threshold for small building parking exemption, e.g.
from 10,000 to 20,000 sf habitable space.
A.13 Maximize flat levels and increase ceiling heights of parking structures to allow
for future adaptive re -use.
A.14 Reduce garage screening requirements for Affordable Housing projects,
allowing Administrative Review.
M MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report
T 0
.On AFFORDABILITY
Building Design and Density
Reduction of certain requirements related to urban design, building density and size,
and unit size.
Article 1 (Definitions) Section 1.2.;
Article 3 (General to Zones) Sections 3.74, 3.15.4. (c & e) & 3.16.3. (c & e);
Article 4 (Standards and Tables) Table 2. Miami27 Summary;
Article 5 (Specific to Zones) Sections 5.5.1. (H) and 5.6.7 (l);
Article 6 (Supplemental Regulations) Table 73.
A.15 Increase threshold for cross -block requirement to reflect median city
block size. Eliminate cross -block requirement for projects that do not span
an entire block (street to street), otherwise cross block connectivity should
be considered a public benefit.
A.16 Remove minimum unit and lot size requirements, other than to be consistent
and compliant with Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and Florida
Building Code (FBC) minimums.
A.17 Allow microunits (under 400 sf) within Affordable Housing projects and
other potential development incentives outside of TOD areas, i.e.,
throughout T4, T5, and T6.
A.18 Eliminate floor plate area and length maximums, for all types of projects.
A.19 Exclude balconies from floorplate maximums. (Only required if floor
plate maximums are not eliminated, as recommended in item A.18)
A.20 Allow micro -units in senior housing, regardless of TOD proximity.
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report
T 0
.On AFFORDABILITY
Policies
Adjustments to polices to facilitate preservation of affordable housing in neighborhoods
and through new development.
Article 7 (Definitions) Section 7.2.;
Article 3 (General to Zones) Section 3.74. Public Benefits Program;
Article 6 (Supplemental Regulations) Table 73; other TBD.
A.21 Provide a clear table in Miami 21 for Affordable Housing incentives.
A.22 Encourage and create flexibility in small scale development (consider a
definition for small scale development).
A.23 Create different standards for adjoining and abutting conditions (i.e. across a
shared property line, across a right-of-way or across a significant geographic
boundary such as a water body, utility easement, or interstate highway) for
Affordable Housing, TODs, setbacks, and public benefits. Clarify if distance
should be measured as the actual walking distance in feet, rather than a
radius i.e. this is important for calculating distance from a TOD.
Processes
Streamlining of process to facilitate development of affordable housing, including
those regulated in the City Code.
Article 7 (Procedures and Nonconformities) Section 7.1.2.8.b. (7) and Section 77.3.
Application and Review Process.
A.24 Remove twice a year rezoning cycle and allow rezoning applications at any
time. Amend Chapter 62 accordingly.
A.25 Establish reasonable, enforceable permit review timelines in Article 7.
e.g. Miami -Dade County has a 21-day review timeline. City regulations,
deliverables and processes should be streamlined to allow for reasonable
timelines.
in MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report
T 0
.On AFFORDABILITY
A.26 The signature requirement by multiple City departments should be removed
for all City Attorney Office approved templates including unities of title,
covenants in lieu, Affordable Housing covenants. City should designate one
reviewer to confirm compliance of required template and deliverables.
A.27 Improve and formalize the preapplication process to provide a weekly
deadline, written comments by all reviewing departments, and a 30-minute
conference with all reviewing departments, like Miami Dade County.
A.28 Notify abutting property owners earlier in the process, after the second
cycle, to allow the most time possible to receive community feedback.
Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs)
Adjustments to ADU requirements to encourage their use to increase overall
housing supply.
Article 4 (Standards and Tables) Table 3. Building Function: Uses, and Table 4. Density,
Intensity and Parking.
Article 6 (Supplemental Regulations) Table 73.
A.29 Allow setback flexibilities for ADUs.
A.30 Increase ADU maximum size.
A.31 Provide more specific guidelines on requirement that ADUs be
"architecturally harmonious."
A.32 Remove ADU parking requirement if transit is nearby, or street parking is
available.
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report 0
T 0
.On AFFORDABILITY
MPc1lRjm-TPrm PPrn mPncJAtinns
Twenty-five recommendations relate to the provision of affordable housing,
implementable in the medium -term.
Definitions
Updates and clarifications of definitions.
Article 7 (Definitions) Section l.l.a.
A.33 Remove work -live and live -work definitions; extend uses to all multifamily housing.
Parking and Loading
Reduction to the parking and loading requirements to facilitate the development
of affordable housing, some involving other City entities such as the Public Works
Department and the Parking Authority
Article 3 (General to Zones) Sections 3.6, 3.75.5 and 3.76.4;
Article 4 (Standards and Tables) Table 4. Density, Intensity and Parking and Table 5.
Building Function: Parking and Loading.
A.34 Allow Development to utilize public parking garages and on street parking
permits in lieu of required parking.
A.35 Encourage T3 street parking by resident only permit at no cost, to empower
parking reductions for other transect zones with no concern for spillover
parking.
A.36 Do not require payment in lieu for parking reductions.
m MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report
T 0
.On AFFORDABILITY
Building Design and Density
Changes to certain requirements related to urban design, building density and
unit size. These require study and research on likely impact on neighborhoods, to
ensure effective implementation, and avoid unintended consequences.
Article 3 (General to Zones) Section 3.70. Historic Preservation Standards, Sections
3.74, 3.75 & 3.16;
Article 4 (Standards and Tables) Table 2. Miami27 Summary and Diagram 11. Transit
Oriented Development (TOD);
Article 5 (Specific to Zones) Section 5.4 / Illustration 5.4, Section 5.5 / Illustration 5.5,
and Section 5.6 / Illustrations 5.6.
A.37 Increase Density in T4 and T5 without increasing building volume,
especially within TODs.
A.38 Do not count Lodging against residential Density. Lodging should be
limited by FLR and minimum lodging unit size in Florida Building Code.
A.39 Allow setback flexibilities beyond 10% Waiver for lots below minimum lot
size. Allow substandard size lots to be approved with Density allowed for
5,000 sf lot, with setback and other reductions.
A.40 Eliminate lot area minimums and maximums for T4, T5, and T6 up to T6-24.
A.41 Govern Density for small sites according to the Future Land Use Map
designation
A.42 Additional incentives to renovate historic structures.
Policies and Processes
Adjustments to policies to facilitate development of affordable housing, some
involving other City entities such as the Public Works Department
Article 2 (General Provisions) Section 2.2.4.3. Calculations, (a) Rounding;
Article 3 (General to Zones) Sections 3.74, 3.75 & 3.16;
Article 7 (Procedures and Nonconformities) Section 7.1. Procedures;
Article 8 (Thoroughfares); City of Miami Public Works Department.
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report ED
T 0
0 AFFORDABILITY
A.43 Reduce Affordable Housing regulations generally, including eliminate Art in
Public Places and garage liner requirements.
A.44 Consider in what circumstances Density may be rounded up, not down.
A.45 Reintroduce Planned Urban Developments (PUD) for archaeological,
geological, and environmental purposes, precluding change of zoning.
A.46 Allow density transfers along Transit Corridors, not just TODs, regardless
of different zoning transeets. Increase TOD and TC radius distance from 1/4
to 1/3 mile.
A.47 Remove the 40,000 sf and 200 linear feet of frontage requirement for land
use and zoning amendments.
A.48 Allow Commission approval of Subsidy Flexibilities through
Exemption process for Affordable Housing.
A.49 Identify Waivers and Warrants that should be as of right for small scale
development and Affordable Housing e.g. when such Waivers and Warrants do not
negatively impact neighborhoods or implement City-wide priorities and streamlining.
A.50 Remove Code requirements that require nonstandard ROW improvement
covenants, or require standard improvements that do not require the
covenants.
A.51 Expedite the Affordable Housing Warrant process through concurrent review
by Public Works and Building and review whether to eliminate
Affordable Housing Warrant requirement altogether or in specific
locations, such as T4.
Incentives
Addition and recalibration of incentives to increase affordable housing development.
Article 3 (General to Zones) Sections 3.74, 3.75 & 3.76.
A.52 Allow full range of TOD incentives in Transit Corridors.
A.53 Create incentives for small-scale development, such as waiving Waiver
process; expediting permitting; reducing plan deliverable requirements;
and eliminating standard comments. Also, allow small sites (20,000 sf
maximum) in T5 and T6 to develop without parking, and to sell unused
density as a market rate benefit, as small sites cannot achieve allowable Density.
® MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report
T 0
0 AFFORDABILITY
A.54 Discourage demolition of existing housing product; for instance, require
development plans to permit demolition, require sod / landscaping for
empty lots, and require maintenance bond.
A.55 Calibrate Affordable and Workforce Housing incentives based on Area
Median Income by neighborhood.
Accessory Dwelling and Commercial Units
Adjustments to Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) regulations to encourage their use
for the overall supply of affordable housing. Several recommendations warrant
further investigation, such as allowing accessory commercial uses.
Article 6 (Supplemental Regulations) Table 73.
A.56 Allow illegal ADUs to be legalized through the permitting process with an
affordability covenant.
A.57 Allow Accessory Commercial Units in certain transect zones, historic districts
and transition areas.
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report
T 0
.On AFFORDABILITY
Building Design and Density
Changes to certain requirements related to urban design, building density and size.
Article 3 (General to Zones) Section 3.74. Public Benefits Program;
Article 4 (Standards and Tables) Table 3. Building Function: Uses, Table 4. Density,
Intensity and Parking, and Diagram 77. Transit Oriented Development.
Article 5 (Specific to Zones) Section 5.3.
A.58 Create Density bonuses citywide for proximity to Transit Corridors and TODs
regardless of proximity to T3.
A.59 Enhance further double density program that is critical for Affordable
Housing production, e.g., allow increase in density to 500 du/acre with the
additional increment to be all affordable to have permitting and impact fees
deferred, such as 25% of units at 75-100% AM I. Also, require annual review,
audit and report on the City's Public Benefit Trust Fund. Data should be
captured and made available to study.
A.60 Encourage Density along Transit Corridors.
A.61 Create specialized T3 zoning that allows triplexes and quadraplexes. Allow
T4 affordable housing abutting T3 to be approved by Exception.
A.62 Encourage a wider range of housing types, e.g.T3-R allow ancillary unit, T3-1-
allow duplexes, T3-0 allow triplexes and quadplexes.
Policies and Incentives
Adjustments to policies and incentives pertaining to the preservation and increase of
the supply of naturally occurring affordable housing.
Article 7 (Definitions) Section 73;
Article 3 (General to Zones) Sections 3.72, 3.74, 3.75 & 336;
Article 4 (Standards and Tables) Table 3. Building Function: Uses.
m MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report
T 0
.On AFFORDABILITY
A.63 Add incentives to preserve naturally occurring affordable housing.
A.64 Through a neighborhood planning process, define elements of
neighborhoods that need to be preserved upon redevelopment, such
as trees, typical lot coverage, etc.
Accessory Dwelling Units
Adjustments to regulations to encourage additional Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs)
development throughout the City.
Article 4 (Standards and Tables) Table 3. Building Function: Uses;
Article 6 (Supplemental Regulations) Table 73; other TBD.
A.65 Allow ADUs in all Transect Zones.
A.66 Allow ADUs in T3-R.
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report
T 0
.On AFFORDABILITY
Other R_ ecommpnclations
The Task Force identified a seventeen recommendations for affordable housing,
which require changes to internal City processes, offer instructions to other
departments or agencies, such as Public Works or the Department of Housing and
Community Development, and impact other regulatory documents, such as the
Miami Code of Ordinances, Chapter 13, Development Impact and Other Related Fees.
A.67 Department of Off -Street Parking (DOSP) must strictly enforce the delivery hours
in locations where external maneuvering of delivery vehicles is allowed.
(See related recommendation A.8 in the `Short-term' category).
A.68 Create affordable homeownership incentives, prioritizing workforce
housing.
A.69 Implement a shorter -term Affordable Housing covenant of less than
20 years in smaller projects (under 25 units) to match the County
standard. e.g., in T4 or T5, 15 years versus 30 years. The reduced
covenant length is required as it caps income for a period that
exceeds maintenance norms.
A.70 Allow a single covenant to cover all required commitments for an
Affordable Housing project, to coordinate zoning, planning, and housing
department requirements.
A.71 Rapidly issue small permits with minimal deliverables relying on design
professionals.
A.72 Prioritize Affordable Housing approvals and permits processes.
A.73 Provide dedicated City reviewers for Affordable Housing projects, to
consolidate and expedite documentation required and minimize length of
process.
A.74 Include Miami -Dade Water and Sewer Department (WASD) in the
impact fee system.
A.75 Reduce WASD fees to reflect smaller property dimensions, and incorporate
WASD fees in future water charges for a project.
A.76 Use City public land for affordable housing.
A.77 Find alternative funding source for infrastructure improvements for small
affordable housing projects.
M MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report —
T 0
.On AFFORDABILITY
A.78 Waive impact fees and permit fees for Affordable Housing developments,
including infrastructure improvements required by Public Works and WASD.
Also, eliminate Impact Fee and Deferral Fee.
A.79 Review of the lien process for special release of lien and violations for
Affordable Housing projects to see if they can be mitigated at the
beginning of the process, not the end. e.g. release all liens on property
developing affordable housing to facilitate financing, with contracts
requiring lien payment if affordability is not delivered.
A.80 The Housing and Community Development certification process should not
assign specific unit AMIs and sizes.
A.81 Produce an ADU manual like the one published by Santa Cruz, offering step
by step instructions.
A.82 Offer City construction financing for affordable ADUs.
A.83 Advertise surplus City land for Affordable Housing development.
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report
A rs `
DA'J=`1IN.-
The City should adapt regulations to address local effects of climate change such
as sea -level rise, increased flooding, and increased heat. The City can also act to
minimize and mitigate contributing factors causing climate change. The City will
benefit economically from both efforts according to a 2020 report prepared by the
Urban Land Institute.
The Task Force recommends that the Code should respond better to impacts of
climate change and that Miami should be at the forefront of providing solutions.
The Task Force observed that while it was possible to identify sustainability and
resiliency objectives, strategies, and best practice within both the City and the
Region, a significant drawback is that one consolidated policy statement does not
exist within the Code or other City Ordinance. The Task Force suggested that the
lack of a codified, consolidated message reduces certainty among residents and
investors, and limits interdepartmental and multi -disciplinary coordination.
Updating and improving enforcement of the Code should play an important role in
the City's overall resilience strategy. The Task Force recommends updates to the Code
which provide predictability, maximize the City's waterfront locations while remaining
open to strategies that address sea level rise and severe weather events. The Task
Force identified shoreline protective strategies, adjusting sea walls, raising grades,
creating new water management and infrastructure planning and maintenance, as
well as providing responsible stewardship of the natural ecosystem, as important
considerations. City staff should collect resiliency data and analyze it to determine
best practices in adaptation. New regulations should be flexible in interpretation to
encourage public and private investment in innovative strategies as they evolve.
m MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report --
a C�% ►CLIMATE CHANGE AND RESILIENCY
Short-T°prm I prnmmpnd apt nns
The Task Force identified ten recommendations that could be implemented in the
short-term to increase emphasis on sustainability and resilience. These are considered
clear recommendations that only requires minor text modifications to the Code and
administrative process with public input to implement.
Definitions
Addition of definitions related to sustainability.
Article 1 (Definitions) Sections 7.2 Definition of Terms and 7.4 Definition of Landscape
Requirements.
13.1 Define Green Roofs and Water Conservation Systems.
13.2 Define solar panels and other sustainable infrastructure.
Building Design
Adjustments to the design requirements to help support resilience and re -purposing
of buildings as climate change impacts evolve.
Article 3 (General to Zones) Section 3.5 Measurement of Height and Section 3.73.
Sustainability
13.3 Provide Height flexibilities when resilience issues cause finished first floor
elevations to rise. Allow 25' ft height for all ground floor uses. See Section 3.5.2.
13.4 Modify the definition of Floor Plate to remove balconies and outdoor open
space amenities from this calculation.
13.5 Incentivize flat garage slabs to allow for the conversion of garage space into
other habitable uses, where feasible.
13.6 Incentivize a maximum first floor height that will allow habitability with a
future, higher slab. All ground floor uses allowed 25' ft height - Section 3.5.2. If
the Sidewalk Elevation points vary by more than 5 ft, the building height shall
be measured from the highest point.
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report 0
s ►CLIMATE CHANGE AND RESILIENCY
Policy
Adjustments to polices to support sustainability and resiliency, including building
adaptations and bolstering natural systems.
Article 3 (General to Zones) Section 3.5 Measurement of Height, Section 3.77 Waterfront
Standards, Section 3.73. Sustainability;
Article 5 (Specific to Zones) Building Configuration for all T-Zones;
Article 9 (Landscape);
Appendix B (Waterfront Design Guidelines).
B.7 Apply freeboard regulations citywide to anticipate longer -term sea -level rise.
B.8 Require native plantings for riverfront properties that do not require a river walk.
B.9 Provide additional incentives for Adaptive Use Buildings: 5% increase or up to
500 sq ft in additional Lot Coverage with Waiver; up to 50% increase in Floor
Area with the same Building footprint with no additional requirements.
B.10 Enhance tree planting requirements with a higher number of required trees
and a higher DBH requirement. Apply tree protection fund proceeds to all
resiliency measures.
M MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report
a C�% ►CLIMATE CHANGE AND RESILIENCY
Seven recommendations related to climate change, sustainabiIityand resilience require
additional time for research and coordination to ensure successful implementation.
Building Design and Landscape
Adjustments to the design requirements to support resilience of buildings and
landscape, especially with regards to sea level rise. These may require study and
research to ensure effective implementation and avoid unintended consequences.
Article 3 (General to Zones) Section 3.5 Measurement of Height, Section 3.11 Waterfront
Standards, Section 3.73. Sustainability, Section 3.74. Public Benefit Program;
Article 5 (Specific to Zones) Building Configuration for all %Zones;
Article 8 (Thoroughfares) and Article 9 (Landscape);
Appendix B (Waterfront Design Guidelines).
B.11 Encourage ground floor building functions that are protected from flooding
like Commercial or Parking.
B.12 Allow for a "sacrificial" first story of development, e.g., exclude first floor from
height regulations to allow flexible freeboard, or allow 25 feet ground floor
height with height measured from highest point of adjoining sidewalk.
13.13 Align Miami 21 regulations with the FEMA Flood Zone Designations and
Definitions.
13.14 Require street tree plantings at back of curb.
B.15 Allow green roof to substitute part of the Green Space requirement.
13.16 Codify in one location in the City Ordinance a consolidated sustainability and
resilience policy. Additionally, update Miami 21 or introduce an entirely new
section to ensure Miami 21 reflects and supports the implementation of
the policy.
13.17 Incentivize development pursuant to LEED or green building certification
process and leave that in 3.14 of Miami 21 but remove overall policy into
the City Code.
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report
a C�% ►CLIMATE CHANGE AND RESILIENCY
L®ndpr-Term Pp-r, mr,
The Task Force identified four resiliency recommendations that require a longer
timeframe to implement as they involve coordination with other documents such as
the Water Management Plan, and with other City departments such as Public Works.
Building Design and Landscape
Adjustments to the design requirements to support resilience of buildings and
landscape, particularly regarding water management. These may require study and/or
research to ensure effective implementation and avoid unintended consequences, as
they are locational differences.
Article 9 (Landscape) Section 9.9 Stormwater Retention/Detention.
B.18 Require additional on -site storm water management for development.
Policy and Process
Adjust existing and new polices in response to the interface of public and private
resilience improvements and to the future consolidation of habitable land.
Article 3 (General to Zones) Section 3.74 Public Benefit Program;
Miami 21 Atlas.
B.19 Amend Section 3.14 of Miami 21 Public Benefits to include seawall and other
resiliency contributions towards Public Benefits. Amend to incorporate credit
in lieu of road impact fees.
B.20 Include Transition Zone in Waterfront Design Guidelines as part of Public
Benefits.
B.21 Create a TDR program for properties that will eventually become
uninhabitable due to sea level rise.
® MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report
a C�% ►CLIMATE CHANGE AND RESILIENCY
The Task Force identified a further seven recommendations for increasing sustainability
and resilience through the integration of sustainability and resilience goals in city-wide
management, beyond the Code regulations.
B.22 Planning Department shall provide number and recommendations for
increases in percentages of native and drought tolerant plants.
B.23 Establish countywide Base Flood Elevation.
B.24 Add leaf protection to storm water infrastructure and run street sweepers
more often.
B.25 Improve upstream water retention.
B.26 Reduce fees and taxes for resilience measures.
B.27 Map curb and gutter conditions citywide.
B.28 Consolidate policy to encourage the prioritization of conservation. The
Public Works and Resiliency department shall work together with the
Climate Change and Resiliency task force. The policy shall include a
monetary assessment and it shall be updated every 3 years.
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report ED
Photo credit Kamira/Shutterstock.com 4y"' -
I Observation
The City is characterized by its prime location, historical neighborhoods, and its
regional cultural and economic role. The mix of neighborhoods and attractions
creates a quality of life appealing to residents and businesses. All City residents
should be able to live in a neighborhood that is attractive, affordable, and safe within
walking distance to work, shopping, schools, and recreation.
For a decade, the Code has shifted development away from automobile dependent,
single -use areas, towards mixed -use neighborhoods and corridors, while maintaining
their unique identity. The Task Force expressed continued support for the form -based
Code's emphasis on urban design rather than strictly regulating uses.
The Task Force suggested adjustments to the Code to protect and strengthen
the character of single-family neighborhoods, while accommodating growth and
investment. The Task Force considered the need to ensure development does not
negatively impact modest residential neighborhoods and minority communities.
Several Task Force recommendations address impacts of Special Area Plans and
respond to other lessons learned in recent years.
m MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report
0QUALITY OF LIFE
Short -Term Recommendations
The Task Force identified nine recommendations that could feasibly be implemented
in the short-term to ensure Quality of Life by engaging residents in planning and
zoning changes, and to protect residential neighborhoods as adjacent development
is approved.
Process
Mod ificationtoprocesses toprotect neighborhoods whilefaciIitatingredevelopment.
Article 7 (Procedures and Nonconformities) Section 7.1.2.8.a;
Article 3 (General to Zones) Section 3.9 Special Area Plan;
Article 7 (Procedures and Nonconformities) Section 7.1.2.8. f. (2).
C.1 Amend Article 7, 7.1.2.8.a to allow greater rezone flexibility from T3 to
T4 when abutting T6, that would result in a more favorable
successional outcome in cases where the applicant does not have
40,000 sf or 200' of linear frontage.
C.2 Amend Article 3, Section 3.9 and Article 7, Section 7.1.2.8.f.2 to require that
additional background information be provided on existing neighborhood
conditions.
Transportation
Addition of traffic metrics in SAP applications.
Article 3 (General to Zones) Section 3.9 Special Area Plan;
Article 7, (Procedures and Nonconformities) Section 7.1.2.8. f. (2).
C.3 Amend Article 3, Section 3.9 and Article 7, Section 7.1.2.8.f.2 to require an
independent traffic study for SAP applications.
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report ES
0QUALITY OF LIFE
Community Engagement
Addition of requirements for community engagement in the SAP process.
Article 3 (General to Zones) Section 3.9 Special Area Plan;
Article 7 (Procedures and Nonconformities) Section 7 7.2.8. c. (2);
CA Amend Article 3, Section 3.9 and Article 7, Section 7.1.2.8.c.2 to require
Community Workshop prior to PZAB notice.
C.5 Amend Article 3, Section 3.9 and Article 7, Section 7.1.2.8.f.2 to require a
higher level of community engagement.
C.6 Create and maintain a City list of neighborhood priorities to encourage
private investment in public benefit projects.
Standards
Various changes to standards to protect neighborhood characteristics while
encouraging revitalization.
Article 3 (General to Zones) Section 3.9 Special Area Plan and Section 3.72.3
Neighborhood Revitalization District;
Article 4, (Standards and Tables) Table 4. Density, Intensity and Parking and Table
.5 Building Function: Parking and Loading.
Article 5 (General to Zones) Sections 5.5.4 and 5.6.4 Parking Standards.
C.7 Amend Article 3, Section 3.9 relating to SAPs to include NRD designation
process criteria from Section 3.12.3.
C.8 Amend Article 4, Table 4 - Density, Intensity and Parking and Table 5
Building Function: Parking and Loading, to allow shared -use factor for
loading and loading berth size exchanges by right (eliminating Waiver).
C.9 Amend Article 5 to exempt small developments of 20,000 sf of Floor Area
or less from on -site loading requirements, and to allow on -street
loading areas. This may require coordination with Public Works.
m MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report
0QUALITY OF LIFE
Medium -Term Recommendations
The Task Force identified eight recommendations to benefit Quality of Life that involve
clarifying certain conditions and processes for the benefit of developers and residents.
Process
Adjustments to processes to facilitate development.
Article 3 (General to Zones) Section 3.72. Design Guidelines, and Section 3.9 Special
Area Plan;
Article 7 (Procedures and Nonconformities) Section7.1.2.6, Section7.1.2.8.a, and Section
77.2.8. f. (2).
C.10 Amend Article 7, Miami 21 to allow for the property owners with "bifurcated
zoning" to request consistent zoning based on ownership, use, historic
designation, or building sites as of 2010.
C.11 Amend Article 7, 7.1.2.6 to allow approval of a Conditional Use not otherwise
permitted, including parking, by Exception.
C.12 Amend Article 7, 7.1.2.8.a to allow exception to Successional Zoning for a Land
Use Plan Amendment and/or Rezoning to accommodate a transition
zone. Allow exception to the rezoning criteria, 40,000 square feet, 200 feet of
linear frontage.
C.13 Follow platted tract lines, conduct a search with the City Clerk to clarify
bifurcation -historical background, and amend Art.2 to allow correction of the
Zoning Atlas. Suggested eighteen -month deadline.
C.14 Conduct an outreach process neighborhood by neighborhood to discuss
changes done to the zoning atlas between 2008 and 2010. Suggested
eighteen -month deadline.
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report
QUALITY OF LIFE
Neighborhood Compatibility and Public Benefits
Adjustments to SAP and NRD regulations to incorporate surrounding neighborhood
residents in approval processes and neighborhood needs in the development plan.
Article 3 (General to Zones) Section 3.9 Special Area Plan;
Article 7, (Procedures and Nonconformities) Section 77.2.8.f.(2).
C.15 Amend Article 3, Section 3.12 to provide what design guidelines and master
plans are enforceable as regulations to ensure compatibility with
neighborhoods, such that guidelines allow flexibility for compatibility.
C.16 Amend Article 3, Section 3.9 and Article 7, Section 7.1.2.8.f.2 to encourage
areas that have the acreage to create a SAP, and address the following
community issues:
• Uses such as grocers in food desert, open space, etc.
• Resilience, service by transit, and service to neighborhoods around them
• Address displacement and gentrification.
• Streetscapes
• Transportation and Transit
Require that the SAP conceptual plan, regulating plan, and
development agreement address surrounding neighborhoods' needs as
expressed in community outreach.
C.17 Amend Article 3, Section 3.9 and Article 7, Section 7.1.2.8.f.2 to establish SAP
criteria for site master planning and development flexibility vs rezone request.
m MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report
0QUALITY OF LIFE
Luna -Term Recommendation
The Task Force identified one Quality of Life recommendation that requires a longer
timeframe to implement as it involves additional clarity in positioning density at the
edges of neighborhoods, which will likely require engagement with residents.
Corridor Zoning
Additionsto procedures for zoning changes that support Transit -Oriented Development
(TOD) along corridors adjacent to residential neighborhoods.
Article 2 (General Provisions) 2.7.3.2 The Community - Guiding Principles.
Article 7 (Procedures and Nonconformities) 7.1.2.8.f Amendment to Miami 27 Code -
Criteria
C.18 Amend Article 2, 2.1.3.2 and Article 7, 7.1.2.8.f to establish "Guidelines for
Urban Form" where Transit Corridors form physical boundaries of
neighborhoods with activity nodes at the intersections and higher densities
being located at the periphery and transition to lower densities in the interior.
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report m
0QUALITY OF LIFE
Other Recommendations
The Task Force identified an additional four recommendations regarding Quality of
Life outside of the Zoning Code that require a longer -term coordination with other
City Departments, the City Commission, and residents.
C.19 Establish that SAP Development Agreements must be enforced via City Code
Enforcement process.
C.20 Engage a consultant to create a uniform traffic methodology and
regulations for City neighborhoods. The traffic consultant should study the
city neighborhood by neighborhood to analyze what traffic calming devices
are most suitable.
C.21 City Commission should define "Minority Communities" and allocate resources
to study any discriminatory effects and identify fixes (including those relating
to zoning).
C.22 Create a pilot program to legalize and keep track of ADUs and if a developer/
owner has more than one ADU, the additional units must be affordable. The
Planning Department shall create a list with the criteria. This program shall be
applicable only in certain areas.
m MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report
V
oto credit: Soiarisys/Shutterstock.com
Observation
While recent development of mixed -use urbanism has supported a variety of jobs
and housing opportunities, both the Commission and the Task Force considered
several enhancements.
The Task Force supports the goals of increasing prosperity for all in the City and
identified opportunities to strengthen equitable objectives, at the same time
safeguarding the unique characteristics of Miami neighborhoods. The Task Force
recommends supporting enhanced transportation planning to accommodate a
technology -based economy and Opportunity Zone investment, and to improve
access to education. Discussion of the importance of the City's streets, the quality of
which impacts residents and businesses, included the need for better coordination
with the Public Works department, alternative approaches for impact fees, and
designation of "Activity Nodes" for development across the city.
— MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report m
0o��+ PROSPERITY
The Task Force identified two recommendations that could be implemented in the
short-term to enable a broader distribution of new employment types.
Definitions
Addition of new use definitions, related to new technologies of fabrication.
Article 7 (Definitions);
Article 4 (Standards and Tables) Table 4. Density, Intensity and Parking.
D.1 Create new Use Definitions to allow for low -impact industrial uses in
commercial zoning, to be part of mixed -use "15-minute city."
D.2 Define and allow City-wide a Use codified in NRD-1 called: Manufacturing
Neighborhood Retail.
Medium -Term Recommendationts
The Task Force identified one recommendation relating to "Activity Nodes" that, with
additional research and study, could be implemented in the medium -term.
Article 7 (Definitions).
D.3 Define "Activity Nodes" and provide a comprehensive study on where these
nodes are, where they should be, and how many.
m MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report
Q/jo+ PROSPERITY
Loncler-Term Recornmendatio
The Task Force identified two recommendations related to traffic planning, including
improvements to the rights -of -way, neighborhood specificity of mobility needs, and
deploying impact fees, that require a longer -term for implementation, given their
dependence on other departments and processes in the City.
Transportation
Adjustments to the interaction of developers, impact fees and transportation planning.
Article 8 (Thoroughfares)
DA Work with Public Works and Planning Department to eliminate Article 8,
consider creating a sub -section under section #52 or section #62 regarding
ROW enhancement.
D.5 Analyze traffic improvements that can be proffered by the developer in
connection with the development of the site as Credit In lieu of Road
Impact Fees.
C?thper Pprnrr mPnclatinne,
The Task Force identified a further five recommendations that are external to the Code
involving City fees and agreements with MDCPS.
D.6 Create an Impact Fee Credit process that is transparent for new business
owners and residents.
D.7 Add a Transportation Planner to Planning reviews to work neighborhood by
neighborhood.
D.8 Publish an impact fee schedule for public view.
D.9 Create a set of standards neighborhood by neighborhood that allows the
developer to acquire Impact Fee credit if the developer complies with one or
more of these.
D.10 Review Certificate of use fee schedule and provide cost -saving options,
such as allowing credit transfers from existing uses, with only new
uses incurring fees.
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report m
VY
Observation
A modern planning system adds value to the development goals of the City and
the creation of high -quality places. The Task Force emphasized the importance of
streamlining services, with efficient and effective processes. Transparent and fair
service also ensures confidence and certainty among residents and investors.
While recognizing the hard work and professionalism of Planning and Zoning Staff, the
Task Force felt that insufficient resources often limited the effective implementation,
maintenance and enforcement of the Code. Planning Department Resources should
be sufficient to ensure a forward -thinking approach to issues and opportunities that
is reflective of a modern, dynamic, and ambitious City, and to provide high -quality
services for residents and businesses looking to invest and develop.
To facilitate the work of the Planning Department, the Task Force recognized the
importance of investing in the latest technology, effective Planning and Zoning
Boards, and adequate staff numbers correlated with any increase in the volume
of applications. The Task Force strongly suggested a program of ongoing reform,
and made several specific recommendations regarding the permitting process,
navigability and usability of Miami 21, the conducting of quasi-judicial hearings,
and other services.
m MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report
0 0 SERVICE
Short -Term Recommendation
The Task Force identified sixteen recommendations which can be implemented in the
short term to improve the quality of service. Task Force recommendations include
updates to standards to facilitate the development process and approval procedures,
including changes to parking requirements, and non -conforming structures regulations.
Process
Updates to various aspects of procedures and nonconformities.
Article 7 (Procedures and Nonconformities) Diagram #74 and Chapter 62 of City Code, -
Article 7 (Procedures and Nonconformities), Section 7.2.2.b;
Article 7 (Procedures and Nonconformities) Section 77.2.5. (Waiver) c. Required Notice
and Hearing.
E.1 Update Article 7 to reflect ePlan, remove NET offices, and update noticing
process.
E.2 Replacement or reconstruction of a nonconforming Structure (other than
Single -Family, duplex or Multi -Family) destroyed by natural disaster,
explosion, fire, act of God, or the public enemy without a Waiver.
(Article 7, Section 7.2.2.b).
E.3 Adjust Diagram #14 (Article 7) to include a comprehensive process with
estimated dates to facilitate the process for developers and applicants, e.g.,
rezoning schedule; pre -application to hearing maximum one year. In addition,
provide a specific flowchart with the process and include a courtesy notice
at the time of filing the application to the neighbors within 250 ft. radius and
the neighborhood associations in the area. As part of the courtesy notice
provide the process number. No additional notice should be required unless
the project is going through a public hearing process (e.g. Exception, rezone,
etc.) that would involve a Hearing Board notice.
EA Review Waivers to eliminate a notification process when there is a deviation
of the Code if this does not affect the neighborhood.
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report m
0 0 SERVICE
E.5 Specify a time frame (30 calendar days) for the City to provide responses
and comments from the meeting between the Applicant and City that
follows the 2nd round of comments.
E.6 Review structure and effectiveness of Planning and Zoning Boards e.g.
consider the establishment of a Planning Board to consider an ongoing
reform program, including Code updates and consideration of
strategic planning issues.
Quasi -Judicial Hearings
An update and an addition to the Quasi -Judicial Hearings process, including noticing
and the appeals process.
Article 7 (Procedures and Nonconformities) 77.5 (Appeals).
E.7 Modernize and update noticing process. Suggested: eliminate certified mail
requirements; City should do all mailings like the Miami Dade County system;
allow affidavits; and all electronic noticing for neighborhood associations and
City representatives (City Code Chapter 62).
E.8 Create and incorporate into Miami 21 criteria from Chapter 23 to submit
appeals for the appellant to list the reasons for the appeal. Also, provide
option to meet with CRC.
m MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report
0 0 SERVICE
General Issues
Adjustments to specific standards and language to facilitate new development,
including reductions to parking, loading, and equipment requirements.
Article 4, (Standards and Tables) Table 5. Building Function: Parking and Loading;
Article 5 (Specific to Zones) Sections 5.3.2.d and 5.4.2.d; Sections 5.4.2.e, 5.5.2.e
and 5.6.2.f; Sections 5.5.1.f, 5.5.4.e, 5.6.1.f and 5.6.4.(g); Section 5.7.2.4.(d).CS and Cl;
Article 6 - (Supplemental Regulations) Table 73.
Article 7 (Procedures and Nonconformities) Section 7.2.2.b; Section 7.1.3.2.7; Section
77.2.8.2 (Amendment to Miami 21 Code).
E.9 Substitute Loading Spaces (Article 4, Table 5), such as allowing substitutions
of Residential for Commercial spaces by Right.
E.10 Adjust encroachment of mechanical equipment, such as air conditioning
units, pumps, exhaust fans or other similar noise producing equipment
for existing Buildings (Article 5, Sections 5.3.2.d and 5.4.2.d), e.g., allow
encroachments into setbacks by requiring energy and ambient efficiency.
E.11 Adjust service and parking access from Principal Frontage (Article 5,
Sections 5.4.2.e, 5.5.2.e and 5.6.2.f), i.e., eliminate Waiver when only
one frontage exists.
E.12 Adjust pedestrian and vehicular entry spacing. (Article 5,
Section 5.5.1.f, 5.5.4.e, 5.6.1.f and 5.6.4.g) to allow entries up to four lanes
wide, 12 feet each lane, and allow delivery / drop-off lay-bys.
E.13 Adjust Building Disposition in Cl. (Article 5, Section 5.7.2.4.d).
E.14 Reduction of reservoir parking space (Article 6).
E.15 Change section 7.1.3.2.7 and remove the 3-acre minimum requirement for a
phased project.
E.16 Modify and clarify Article 7.1.2.8.2 language to state "may be approved
through an SAP process."
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report m
0 0 SERVICE
Medium -Term Recommendations
The Task Force identified ten recommended service improvements to be implemented
in the medium term, including timeframes for project review processes, the addition of
more detailed information for several sections of the Code, reduction of some parking
and review standards, and the incorporation of Code elements in the NCD3. These
require additional time for review of processes and references.
Process
Additional flexibility in parking requirements, and additional control of the length of
the approvals process.
Article 5 (Specific to Zones) Sections 5.5.2, 5.5.4.d, 5.5.4.e, 5.6.2, 5.6.4.d and 5.6.4.e;
Article 5 (Specific to Zones) Sections 5.3.2.b, 5.4.2.b, 5.5.2.b, and 5.6.2.c.
Article 5 (Specific to Zones) Illustrations 5.5 and.5.6;
Article 7 (Procedures and Nonconformities) Section 77.2.5. (Waiver);
Article 7 (Procedures and Nonconformities) 7.1.2.8.b. (7&2) Amendment to Miami 27
Code.
E.17 Remove unnecessary Waivers:
• Parking reduction for elderly housing or adaptive reuse.
• Dominant Setbacks.
• Shared access in adjoining lots.
• Remove parking requirements in TODs
E.18 Expand Waivers to include resiliency such as: allowing stairs to encroach 50%
of depth of first layer; eliminating loading berth substitution waiver
requirements; increasing waiver extent to 30% in TOD areas; exchanging
requirements of waiver for parking screening above first floor with Planning
Director review.
E.19 Adjust Principal and Secondary Frontage Parking placement (Article 5,
Sections 5.5.4.d, 5.5.4.e, 5.6.4.d and 5.6.4.e) and convert this into a "By Right"
E.20 Modify Article 7 Section (29) to be granted "administratively".
E.21 Conduct a comprehensive review of Miami 21 every two years. Specify the
process with meetings district by district. Hire a consultant for these activities.
m MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report --
0 0 SERVICE
General Issues
Changes of and additions to specific standards.
Article 5 (Specific to Zones) Section 5.3.7. (H).
Article 6 (Supplemental Regulations) Section 6.3.2 (Vending Carts in Open Air Retail)
Article 6 (Supplemental Regulations) potential addition of Section 6.3.6 Outdoor
Dining, -
Appendix A (Neighborhood Conservation District) Section A.3 Coconut Grove
Neighborhood Conservation District (NCD-3);
Article 7 (Procedures and Nonconformities) 77.2.6 (Exception).
E.22 Reduce setbacks and allow greater flexibility within the setbacks for one-story,
non -habitable accessory structures in T3. See Section 5.3.1.H.
E.23 Section 3.6.1(e) - existing surface lot - to allow for conditional use through an
Exception process rather than re -zoning process.
E.24 Review inconsistency between NCD3 and Miami 21 - Building Heights should
be measured to the eaves (Miami 21), not midpoint of pitched roof (NCD3),
which encourages flat roofs, low pitches to avoid compressed ceiling heights.
E.25 Create criteria to enable outdoor dining; distinguish between public space
such as sidewalks and private space such as decks and roofs; review Noise
Ordinance (City Code) for enforcement.
Open Space
Additional information for the Public Benefit Program to encourage provision of
additional open space in the City.
Article 3 (General to Zones) 3.14.4.b (Public Benefits Program) Public Parks, Open
Space or Park Improvements.
E.26 Work with Parks department to create a priority list of park improvements,
open spaces and spaces located under the highways that can be improved as
part of developments nearby and count these improvements towards
public benefits, with assistance of an Ombudsman (Section 5.3.6). In all
circumstances the role of an Ombudsman should be clearly defined.
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report m
0 0 SERVICE
Long -Term Recomendations
The Task Force listed one additional service recommendation to further encourage
developing methods for private sector improvement of public property, and broader
use of school properties. These would require coordination among other City
Departments such as Public Works, and Miami -Dade County Public Schools (MDCPS).
Education
Improvements to access routes to schools for pedestrians and bicycles.
Article 3 (General to Zones) 3.9 (Special Area Plans) and 3.74. (Public Benefits Program)
E.27 Amend Article 3 of Miami 21 to include incentivizes for offsite improvements to
pedestrian, bicycle, other mobility connections between schools and the
subject property within 1 or 2 miles of the school; particularly those
schools that connect to transit stations. Provide for impact fee
credits to Miami Dade County impact fee, or Miami 21 Public Benefit
Credits (Section 3.14). Coordination between MDC Public Schools and Public
Works. Include in SAP requirements.
M MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report
0 0 SERVICE
Other Recommendations
The Task Force identified a further six recommendations regarding efficiency of public
resources outside of the Code's purview. These recommendations relate to internal
City processes, the City's Public Works and Parks Departments, and Miami -Dade
County Public Schools.
E.28 Consider accepting review by a private provider applicable to the zoning process.
E.29 Hire an ombudsman for the City, who shall provide cross training among
different departments regarding Affordable Housing process including the
covenants, and who shall limit the requirements for the execution to the
minimum. E.g. Section 7.1.1: City shall create Ombudsman position to be
responsible for designing efficiency in processing all projects through zoning,
planning, building and public works process. The ombudsman will facilitate
prompt attention to applications by city staff, review ePlan workflows for
improvements in service, and assist with cross -departmental delays. In all
circumstances the role of an Ombudsman should be clearly defined.
E.30 Coordinate school concurrency process with Miami Dade County Public
Schools (MDCPS) and City of Miami for possibility to provide transportation
between private developments to public schools that their projects serve.
Also, City of Miami shall coordinate with Miami Dade County public
transportation for the use of their public trolley system to assist with
transportation of students within 2 miles of the school.
E.31 Coordinate with MDCPS Public Schools the use of public space owned by
MDCPS for public access and recreational use.
E.32 Acquire additional land to be dedicated towards public open space especially
in those neighborhoods that lack it.
E.33 Create a program to clean vacant (private) lots and turn them into low-cost
temporary parks as a collaboration between Parks, Code Enforcement, and a
nonprofit organization.
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report
Page Left Intentionally Blank
am
: _ , A.
,1r.
i tt
r% lol,
� Y �
Observation
During the decade since the Code was adopted, there have been many successful
outcomes, several amendments have responded to changing needs, and new
challenges have emerged. The Task Force supports the practice of continual
monitoring of the Code's positive impacts and shortcomings, with updates and
improvements implemented on a regular and systematic basis.
The Task Force's assessment focused on several specific interests. The Task Force
would like staff to assess whether the Code had created more mixed -use and
transitional zones on a city-wide basis, identify government -owned properties on
the Miami 21 Atlas, and track the number of approved developments. The Task
Force recommends investment in resources to allow data collection, archiving and
transparency which encourages staff efficiency and confidence in investors and
stakeholders.
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report
OASSESSMENT
Short -Term Recommendations
The Task Force identified three short-term recommendations to facilitate
implementation, including adjustments to the Miami 21 Code and Atlas.
Article 3 (General to Zones) Section 3.152.b;
Article 5 (Specific to Zones) Illustrations 5.6 Urban Core Transect Zones;
Article 8 (Thoroughfares) and Public Works Department.
F.1 Allow adjustments to the first layer for properties fronting a 70 ft ROW or
larger from 10 ft to 5 ft.
F.2 Make Lot Coverage in T6-48 and above, 100% instead of 90% with the
inclusion of additional common public and private open spaces.
F.3 Remove Section 3.15.2.b from Miami 21.
Medium -Term Recommendations
The Task Force identified three recommendations to improve neighborhood infill
and verify consistency with other government documents such as the County's
Transportation Plan.
Article 3 (General to Zones) Section 3.3.6 (3.3. Lots and Frontages);
Article 4 (Standards and Tables) Diagram 70. Area Specific Illustrations.
FA Provide incentives to build smaller projects within the neighborhood context,
to revitalize existing structures, complete neighborhoods, and eliminate
empty lots within them with exception of NRDs, SAPs, and large-scale
projects. Such as 50% FAR increase, setback and lot coverage relief, and
other similar Wynwood Norte (NRD-2) standards.
F.5 Verify that Miami 21 is consistent with the Miami Dade Long Range
Transportation Plan and implement the needed policies in the zoning code.
F.6 Revisit the Established Setback requirements and update them into urbanistic
conditions and active first floor uses, with the metrics provided by the
Planning Department.
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report M
OASSESSMENT
Other Recommendations
The Task Force recommendation for intergovernmental agreements to ensure
institutional compliance, do not affect the Code text, but would require coordination
efforts and time to implement.
F.7 Prioritize review, enforcement and updating of intergovernmental agreements.
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report
aw!�l mmltit m � rl —
i,ZA lml r..., J' -I air. sa ivy-. bs _'_
�I yl
.1 -
• �^ „ �z 3 F � .e �. 41 :� A
l
� STai
HS
�r.11P
r1
_ w
J
`�' • •It-
jr p- ••
MIAMI 21
TASK FORCE
Recommendations Report
APPENDICIES
CONTENTS
Appendices
A. City Commission Resolutions
B. City Staff Briefing Notes
C. Map of City -Owned Properties
D. Information Related to Warrants
E. Information Related to Waivers
F. Information Related to LEED Certification
G. Discussion Comments and Associated Recommendations
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report O
Appendices
APPENDIX A.
CITY COMMISSION RESOLUTIONS
Resolution R-19-0523
Adopted December 19, 2019
A RESOLUTION OF THE MIAMI CITY COMMISSION DIRECTING THE CITY
ADMINISTRATION, INCLUDING THE CITY MANAGER, WHO WILL ACTIVELY SEEK THE
INVOLVEMENT AND PARTICIPATION OF THE PLANNING DIRECTOR, ZONING
DIRECTOR, AND THE CITY ATTORNEY, TO REPORT TO THE CITY COMMISSION ON THE
VIABILITY OF ORDINANCE NO. 13114, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF
MIAMI, FLORIDA, AS AMENDED ( "MIAMI 21 CODE" ), CONDUCTING A
COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW OF THE MIAMI 21 ATLAS, EVALUATING THE DEVELOPMENT
DIRECTION OF THE CITY' S NEIGHBORHOODS, BY ISSUING A MIAMI 21 CODE REPORT
AS REFERENCED HEREIN, AND REPORT TO THE CITY COMMISSION WITHIN ONE
HUNDRED EIGHTY (180) DAYS, ANY RECOMMENDATIONS, CHANGES, OR ACTIONS,
THAT SHOULD BE TAKEN; ESTABLISHING A TASK FORCE TO WORK WITH THE CITY
ADMINISTRATION AND PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING CHANGES TO THE
MIAMI 21 CODE.
WHEREAS, the City of Miami ( "City" ) finds itself in an Affordable Housing Crisis
with over thirty five percent (35%) of the City' s renters being extremely cost burdened,
and fifty-five percent (55%) of all City residents paying more for housing proportionally
relative to their income; and
WHEREAS, the City of Miami Mayor and City Commission declared the City in a
Climate Emergency requiring a revisiting of Ordinance No. 13114, the Zoning Ordinance of
the City of Miami, Florida, as amended, ( "Miami 21 Code" ) to address these issues as well
as possible modifications as needed; and
WHEREAS the Miami 21 Code was adopted by the City Commission in 2009 with an
effective date of May 2010; and
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report
Appendices
WHREAS, the Miami 21 Code was envisioned as a plan of action to provide guiding
steps for planning the City' s present and future development, redevelopment, and
growth; and
WHEREAS, the Miami 21 Code, as stated in an official posting, is an example of
a Form -based Zoning Code which regulates development to achieve a specific urban form
by placing an emphasis on the relationship between the street and buildings, pedestrians
and vehicles, public and private spaces, and the relationship between multiple buildings, a
block, a neighborhood and transitions in scale, and thereby creating a predictable public
realm by controlling physical form of private developments, with a secondary focus on
land use regulations; and
WHEREAS, the former Zoning Ordinance of the City, Ordinance 11000 ( "Ordinance
11000" ), was a traditional Euclidian type of Zoning Ordinance in effect from 1990 to 2010,
which provided a plan and map of the regulated area indicating the type of allowed
activities and regulations; and
WHEREAS, Ordinance 11000 and all predecessor zoning ordinances of the City were
Euclidian types of zoning ordinances that regulated differing land use districts based on
residential, commercial, institutional and industrial and are referred to as "Traditional" or
"Building Block" zoning ordinances; and,
WHEREAS, it has now been approximately ten (10) years since the passage of the
Miami 21 Code and it is timely for the City to now collect data, analyze, assess, evaluate,
conduct a comprehensive review, and advise (collectively referred to as "the Miami 21
Report" ) City Officials and the community, inclusive of residents and businesses, whether
the Miami 21 Code has achieved its stated goals and purposes; and
WHEREAS, Article 7, Section 7.1.2.8, titled "Amendment to Miami 21 Code" ,
Subsection 7.1.2.8.b.2 provides that "[e]very two years, the City may conduct a
comprehensive review of the Miami 21 Atlas to evaluate the development direction of the
city' s neighborhoods and determine if additional amendments are appropriate, and, to
date, no comprehensive review of Miami 21 has been conducted; and,
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report
WHEREAS, the matters to be considered, comprehensively reviewed, and included
in the Miami 21 Report include: the accessibility, availability, and incentives for Applicants
to provide Affordable Housing in the City; how the discrepancy between the County and
City Average Median Income ( "AMI" ) impacts the ability to provide affordable housing
units to City residents or impacts supply and demand to affect market -rate residential
products; a comprehensive review of the Miami 21 Atlas evaluating the development
direction of the City' s neighborhoods; how the Miami 21 Code should address climate
change and resiliency in permitted developments; Special Area Plan( "SAP" ) issues;
improper abutting zoning transects (e.g. T5 abutting T3 residential transects), or otherwise
inconsistent with the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan ( "MCNP" ); preservation
of single-family residential neighborhoods; opportunity zones; review of
accepted/adopted master plans or neighborhood plans; development impact on
gentrification and displacement; development effects on minority and local resident
communities; interaction with the MCNP; effects on transportation, education and
schools, and income inequality; technology and creation of a tech eco-system and
economy; creating Activity Nodes at the intersection of two major section line roads;
Accessory Dwelling Units ( "ADU" ); parking requirements; updates to the Miami 21 Atlas
to reflect government -owned properties; process and length of obtaining major and
routine day-to-day permits identified in Article 7 of the Miami 21 Code; noticing and
conducting required quasi-judicial hearings; the number of approved developments that
have been tracked or recorded for the time period the Miami 21 Code has been in effect;
whether the Miami 21 Code has created more mixed -use and transitional zones on a City-
wide basis; and whether the City' s residents and businesses find the Miami 21 Code easy
to understand, navigate through, and use; and
WHEREAS, the Mayor and City Commission shall additionally appoint, with each
elected official appointing two members, a twelve (12) member task force of development
and housing industry members and residents of the City to be able to give the perspective
and recommendations of possible changes to the Miami 21 Code, which shall work
in conjunction with the City Administration; and
WHEREAS, the City Commission desires to have the City Administration, including
the City Manager, City Attorney, Planning Director, and Zoning Director, compile, prepare,
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report W
Appendices
and issue the Miami 21 Report, as hereinabove outlined, to the City Commission within
one hundred eighty (180) days following the passage of this Resolution; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 2-33(f) of the Code of the City of Miami, Florida, as
amended, the City Commission unanimously deems this Resolution to be of an emergency
nature in order to immediately protect the public health, welfare, and safety of the City' s
residents;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI,
FLORIDA:
Section 1. The recitals and findings contained in the Preamble of this Resolution are
adopted by reference and incorporated as if fully set forth in this Section.
Section 2. The City Administration, including the City Manager, who will actively
seek the involvement and participation of the Planning Director, Zoning Director, and the
City Attorney, are directed to report to the City Commission on the viability of the Miami
21 Code by issuing a Miami 21 Code Report as referenced herein, and report to the City
Commission within one hundred eighty (180) days of the passage of this Resolution, any
recommendations, changes, or actions that should be taken.
Section 3. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its adoption
and signature of the Mayor.
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report
Appendices
Resolution R-19-0523
Adopted October 8, 2020
A RESOLUTION OF THE MIAMI CITY COMMISSION ESTABLISHING A MIAMI 21 TASK
FORCE ( "TASK FORCE" ) TO WORK WITH THE CITY OF MIAMI'S ADMINISTRATION FOR
RECOMMENDATIONS ON POSSIBLE CHANGES TO ORDINANCE NO. 13114,THEZONING
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, AS AMENDED ("MIAMI 21 CODE");
STATING THE TASK FORCE'S PURPOSE, POWERS, DUTIES, COMPOSITION, MEMBERSHIP
APPOINTMENT QUALIFICATIONS, AND REQUIREMENTS FOR MEMBERSHIP; PROVIDING
FOR OFFICERS, MEETINGS, QUORUM, LEGAL AND STAFF SUPPORT, ASSIGNMENT OF
PERSONNEL, PUBLIC NOTICE, AND SUNSET; AND PROVIDING FOR AN IMMEDIATE
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City Commission adopted Resolution No. R-19-0523, which directed
the City of Miami' s ( "City" ) Administration to assess Ordinance No. 13114, the Zoning
Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended ( "Miami 21 Code" ), by conducting a
comprehensive review of the Miami 21 Code and issuing a report to the Mayor and City
Commission ( "Report" ), as more particularly detailed in Resolution No. R-19-0523; and
WHEREAS, the Report is to be issued to the Mayor and City Commission within one
hundred eighty (180) days of the adoption of Resolution No. R-19-0523, as extended by
Ordinance No. 13902 and as may further be extended by the City Commission; and
WHEREAS, relative to the tasks involved with the Report, the Mayor and the City
Commission are hereby appointing a twelve (12) member Miami 21 Task Force ( "Task
Force" ), which will work in conjunction with the City' s Administration to give its
perspective and recommendations for possible recommended changes and measures to be
taken relative to the Miami 21 Code; and
WHEREAS, the City Commission finds that it is important to have input and
recommendations from City staff as well as individuals from the community, individuals who
regularly use and work with the Miami 21 Code, and individuals who are familiar with
planning, zoning, and land use principles; and
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report M
Appendices
WHEREAS, Chapter 2, Article XI, Division 2, Section 2-883 of the Code of the City of
Miami, Florida, as amended ( "City Code" ), allows for the creation of new boards by either
Ordinance or Resolution; and
WHEREAS, the number, qualifications, responsibilities, and manner of appointment
of the Task Force members are set forth in this Resolution; and
WHEREAS, the City Commission finds it is in the best interests of the City that this
Resolution be adopted;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI,
FLORIDA:
Section 1. The recitals and findings contained in the Preamble to this Resolution are
adopted by reference and incorporated as if fully set forth in this Section.
Section 2. The City Commission hereby establishes the Task Force consisting of
twelve (12) voting members. The Mayor and each District Commissioner shall each be
afforded two (2) appointments.
Section 3. Composition, Appointment, and Qualifications.
a. A minimum of four (4) members shall be electors of the City.
b. Ten (10) of the twelve (12) members shall practice in one (1) of the following
profession or occupation categories, with at least one (1) member in each
category practicing as a:
I. Registered architect licensed under Chapter 481, Florida Statutes;
professional civil engineer licensed under Chapter471, Florida Statutes; or
a planner;
II. Member of the Florida Bar with experience in the practice of land use law
and/or real estate development;
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report M
Appendices
III. Real estate developer or builder, preferably with experience in affordable
housing, large or small scale development, mixed use development, or
planning;
c. Two (2) of the twelve (12) members shall be community leaders.
d. No alternate members shall be appointed.
e. All members will serve without compensation. In addition, all members should
have demonstrated an interest in, or experience relating to, the Miami 21 Code or
other governmental codes such as planning, zoning, building, and/or housing codes.
All members shall be subject to the provisions set forth in Section 2-884 of the City
Code.
Section 4. Purpose; Attendance; Vacancies.
The purpose, powers, and duties of the Task Force are as follows:
a. The Task Force will meet periodically but at least monthly beginning as soon as
enough members are appointed to constitute a quorum. The Task Force will meet at
publicly noticed meetings complying with Florida' s Sunshine Law and, acting by
and through its Chairperson, will deliver its recommendations to the City
Commission, Mayor, and City Manager on possible changes or measures to the
Miami 21 Code as more particularly described in Resolution No. R-19-0523.
b. At the conclusion of the City Commission' s consideration of the Task Force' s
written recommendations, the responsibilities of the Task Force shall be deemed
completed and the Task Force will automatically sunset. If the one hundred eighty
(180) day period in which the City Manager is required to submit the Report to the
City Commission as required by Resolution No. R-19-0523 is extended by the City
Commission, the Task Force will also continue during such extension period until the
Report is finally issued as required by Resolution No. R-19-0523.
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report M
Appendices
c. It is expected that the appointed members of the Task Force attend each
meeting. Attendance requirements and removal from the Task Force shall be
pursuant to Section 2-886 of the City Code.
d. Vacancies on the Task Force shall be filled pursuant to Section 2-885(a)(3) of the
City Code.
Section 5. Officers.
At the initial meeting, the members of the Task Force shall select and designate a
Chairperson and Vice -Chairperson from among the members of the Task Force who shall
serve at the pleasure of the Task Force.
Section 6. Meetings and Quorum.
All meetings of the Task Force shall be noticed and open to the public. The public
shall be encouraged to submit oral or written comments to the Task Force. A minimum of
fifty percent (50%) plus one (1) of the total members of the Task Force then appointed shall
constitute a quorum for the purpose of convening any meeting. An affirmative vote of a
majority of the members present and voting at any meeting is required for any action to be
taken by the Task Force.
Section 7. Rule of Procedure; Roberts Rules of Order.
The Task Force may adopt its own order of business and rules of procedure
governing its meetings and take actions on matters within its jurisdiction not inconsistent
with the provisions set forth herein, which rules of procedure shall be filed with the City
Clerk. If no such rules of procedure are expressly adopted, the Task Force shall use
Robert' s Rules of Order without the necessity of other action. Robert' s Rules of
Order will govern in the event the adopted rules of procedure are silent on an issue. The
Task Force shall comply with all requirements of Chapters 119 (Public Records) and 286
(Sunshine Law), Florida Statutes. The minutes of each meeting shall be promptly made
available and such records shall be open to public inspection. Copies of minutes of all Task
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report M
Appendices
Force meetings shall be furnished to the Mayor, City Commissioners, City Attorney, and
City Manager.
Section 8. Legal Counsel.
The City Attorney' s Office shall serve as legal counsel to the Task Force and shall
provide legal advice on all matters considered by the Task Force. The City Attorney or
designee shall provide legal support to the Task Force and attend all Task Force meetings.
Section 9. Assignment of Staff.
It shall be the duty of the City Manager to provide full cooperation and sufficient
personnel for necessary administrative support to the Task Force including assignment of
an individual to act as liaison and secretary to the Task Force as well as the assignment of
individuals from any and all City Departments and Offices, as may be necessary, to advise
the Task Force about ongoing and pending issues. It shall be the duty of the Task Force' s
liaison to keep minutes or cause said minutes to be taken at all meetings, maintain Task
Force correspondence, post meeting notices with the City Clerk, file reports, and perform
all other necessary support functions. The City Manager, Planning Director, and Zoning
Administrator may participate in deliberations of the Task Force, as requested by the Task
Force, and may give technical and policy advice to the Task Force as requested. The City
Manager shall ensure that the Planning Director and Zoning Administrator, or their
respective designees, will be present at all meetings and available to aid the Task Force
upon request.
Section 10. Sunset.
This Task Force will automatically sunset once its perspectives and
recommendations regarding the Miami 21 Code and any recommendations of possible
changes or measures to be made to the Miami 21 Code have been delivered through the
Task Force' s Chairperson to the Mayor, City Commission, and City Manager or upon the
expiration of three hundred sixty four days (364) from the date this Resolution is adopted,
whichever occurs first.
Section 11. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its adoption.
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report W
Appendices
APPENDIX B.
CITY STAFF BRIEFING NOTES
A. Briefing Note - Affordable Housing
This document is a collection of the City' s affordable housing incentives offered by Miami
21. To provide additional context, some complimentary programs in the City Code and
available forms of subsidy are also included to provide a better understanding of the way
Miami 21 intersects with other incentives. Items in this document are categorized as one of
the following:
• Affordable programs (Program)
• Incentives that encourage affordability (Incentive)
• Policies that encourages affordability (Policy)
• Fee discounts or monetary support (Subsidy)
Miami 21
Article 1 - Definitions:
(Incentive) Accessory Structure: An Accessory Structure is a Structure customarily incidental
and subordinate to the Principal Structure and, unless otherwise specifically provided,
located on the same premises. "On the same premises" shall be construed as meaning on
the same Lot or on a contiguous Lot in the same ownership. Where a Building is attached to
the Principal Building, it shall be considered part thereof, and not an Accessory Structure.
(Program) Affordable / Workforce Housing: Housing priced up to 120% of the area median
income as certified by the City' s Community Development Department.
(Program) Affordable Housing: Affordable Housing shall mean a Dwelling Unit, owner -
occupied and/or rental housing with a purchase cost, value, or monthly rental, as applicable,
equal to or less than the amounts established by the applicable standards for those
individuals whose income is at or below 60 percent of Area Median Income as published by
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report W
Appendices
the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development and certified by the
Department of Community and Economic Development.
(Program) Attainable Mixed -Income Housing: Attainable Mixed -Income Housing shall
mean a development comprised of Extremely Low Income Housing, Affordable Housing,
and Workforce Housing; and may be subject to Density bonuses.
(Program) Attainable Workforce Housing: Attainable Workforce Housing shall mean a
Development comprised of Workforce Housing, servicing multiple income ranges between
60% of the Area Median Income and 140% of the Area Median Income, as described in
Section 3.16 of this Code.
(Incentive) Micro Dwelling Unit: A small Multi -Family Residential Dwelling Unit type that
shall include sanitary facilities and kitchen facilities. See Article 6. Table 13.
(Incentive) Transit Corridor: A designation established by the City involving an area not
exceeding a one -quarter (1/4) mile radius from a non -limited access thoroughfare that
included designated transit stop locations and is served by one or more mass transit route(s)
with designated transit vehicle(s) operating at an average of ten (10) minute or less headway
Monday thru Friday between the hours of 7am thru 7pm. Multiple transit routes or types of
transit vehicles may be added cumulatively under this definition for the purpose of parking
reductions.
(Incentive) Transit Oriented Development (TOD): A designation established by the City
within the Pedestrian Shed or Bicycle Shed area of a convergence of modes of transit, or a
train station.
(Program) Workforce Housing: Workforce housing shall mean a Dwelling Unit, owner -
occupied and/or rental housing with a purchase cost, value, or monthly rental, as applicable,
equal to or less than the amounts established by the applicable standards for those
individuals whose income is between 60 percent to 140 percent of Area Median Income as
published by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development and
certified by the Department of Community and Economic Development.
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report
Appendices
Article 2 — General Provisions:
(Policy) 2.1.3.1.b: Growth strategies should encourage Infill and redevelopment.
(Policy) 2.1.3.1.h: Affordable and Workforce Housing should be distributed throughout the
City to matchjob opportunities and to avoid concentrations of poverty.
(Policy) 2.1.3.1.i: The City should expand and enhance transit opportunities and connections
throughout the City.
(Policy) 2.1.3.2.c: The ordinary activities of daily living should occur within walking distance
of most dwellings, allowing independence to those who do not drive.
(Policy) 2.1.3.2.i: Within Neighborhoods, a range of housing types and price levels should
accommodate diverse ages and incomes.
(Policy) 2.1.3.3.h: Preservation and renewal of historic resources should be facilitated to
affirm the continuity of the community.
Article 3 General to Zones:
(Policy) 3.12.3 Neighborhood revitalization Districts (NRD), b.6: Implement a Public Benefits
Program calibrated to the neighborhood to address specific needs for
Affordable/Workforce Housing, Public Parks and Open Space, or Civic Space or Civic
Support Uses.
(Program) 3.14: The intent of the Public Benefits Program established in this section is to
allow bonus Building Height and FLR in T6 Zones and bonus Building Height in D1 Zones in
exchange for the developer' s contribution to specified programs that provide benefits to
the public.
3.14.4
For the purposes of the public benefits program, the following criteria shall apply:
a. Affordable/ Workforce Housing. The development project in a T6 zone may provide
any of the following or combination thereof:
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report
Appendices
1. Affordable/Workforce housing on site of the development. For each square
foot of Affordable/Workforce housing priced at or below eighty percent (80%)
area median income (including pertaining shared space such as parking and
circulation) provided on site, the development shall be allowed three (3)
square feet of additional area up to the bonus Height and FLR as described in
Section 3.14.1. For each square foot of Affordable/Workforce housing priced
above eighty percent (80%) area median income (including pertaining shared
space such as parking and circulation) provided on -site, the development
shall be allowed an equivalent amount of development Floor Area up to the
bonus Height and FLR as described in Section 3.14.1.
2. Affordable/Workforce housing off -site. For each square foot of affordable
/workforce housing (including pertaining shared space such as parking and
circulation) provided off site, in a location within the City approved by the City
Manager, the development shall be allowed an equivalent square footage of
additional area up to the bonus Height and FLR as described in Section 3.14.1.
No additional allowance is given for the purchase of the site.
3. Trust Fund contributions. For a cash contribution to the Miami 21 Public
Benefit Trust Fund, the development shall be allowed additional Floor Area up
to the bonus Height and FLR described in Section 3.14.1. The cash
contribution shall be determined based on a percentage of the market value
of the per square foot price being charged for units at projects within the
market area where the proposed project seeking the bonus is located. The
calculation assumes a land value per saleable or rentable square foot within
market area to equate to between 10 (ten) to 15 (fifteen) percent of market
area' s weighted average sales price per square foot. The cash contributions
shall be adjusted on an annual basis to reflect market conditions effective
October 1st of every year.
(Program) 3.15: Affordable and Attainable Mixed -Income Housing Special Benefit Program
Supplemental Regulations
(Program) 3.16: Workforce Housing Special Benefit Program Supplemental Regulations
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report W
Appendices
Article 4 Standards and Tables:
(Incentive) Table 4: Density, Intensity and Parking
• TOD and Transit Corridor Parking Reductions for T4/T5/T6/Cl/D1/D2/D3 "Except for
sites within 500 feet of an ungated T3 Transect Zone, the parking ratio may be
reduced within a TOD area or within a Transit Corridor area by up to thirty percent
(30%) by process of Waiver; by up to fifty percent (50%) by process of Waiver and
payment into a transit enhancement Trust Fund, as established by Chapter 35 of the
City Code; or by one hundred percent (100%) for any Structure with a Floor Area of
ten thousand (10,000) square feet or less."
(Incentive) Table 5: Shared Parking Table
Article 6 Supplemental Regulations:
(Incentive) Table 13: ADU in T3-L, T4-R, T4-L, and T4-0
• Maximum size of unit 450 square feet excluding garage.
• Shall only be used as Single -Family Residence dwelling.
• May only be rented if the principal dwelling owner is in residence on site.
• Unit Structure shall be architecturally harmonious with the Principal Building.
• Any Facade abutting another property shall provide only clerestory windows along
that corresponding Facade.
• (Article 4 Table 4) One parking space per ADU
(Incentive) Table 13: Micro Dwelling Unit T5-L, T5-0, T6-L, and T6-0: Micro Dwelling Unit:
275 square feet min. Only permitted within a TOD area. Permitted by Warrant. Prohibited on
a Lot Abutting T3. (Article 4 Table 4) Parking maximum of 1 space per unit.
Article 11 Art in Public Places:
(Incentive) 11.4.c.5 The AIPPB, at a public hearing, may waive the following from the Public
Art Program upon recommendation from the Public Art Division:... Affordable Housing
Developments not otherwise required to provide Public Art pursuant to Section 2-11.15 of
the Miami -Dade County Code, as amended.
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report
Miami City Code
Chanter 13 Development Impact and Other Related Fees:
(Subsidy) Section 13-8 Deferra/of impact fees for affordable (and workforce) housing.
Chapter 62 Planning and Zoning:
(Policy) Article XVII, Section 62-663 Requirements, enforcement provisions, and penalties
for restrictive covenants associated with affordable or workforce housing related to
development incentives, benefits, or bonuses.
Affordable Housing Subsidy
Chapter 13 Development Impact and Other Related Fees:
(Subsidy) Section 13-8 Deferra/of impact fees for affordable (and workforce) housing.
Federal, State, and Local Subsidy Sources:
(Subsidy) Affordable Housing Program (AHP) The Federal Home Loan Banks' Affordable
Housing Program (AHP) is one of the largest private sources of grant funds for affordable
housing in the United States. It is funded with 10% of the Federal Home Loan Banks' net
income each year. The AHP allows for funds to be used in combination with other programs
and funding sources, like the Low -Income Housing Tax Credit."
Funds may be used for the purchase, construction, or rehabilitation of rental project, where
at least 20 percent of the units in the project are occupied by and affordable for very low-
income households.
Maximum Grant Award is $500,000 per project
(Subsidy) HOME Program Sponsored by the Department of Housing and Urban
Development (HUD) offers financing for single family development and multi -family rental
housing development for low-income families. Under HOME, the HUD funds are made
available to state and local government agencies that evaluate the applications, award the
funds and supervise the assisted projects.
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report M
Appendices
Home funds may be used to:
• Develop most types of housing related projects
• Acquire Property
• Rehab and Construct property
Rents for HOME assisted units are strictly controlled and tenants must be low-income.
Rents and income requirements must be maintained and monitored for a minimum of 5 to
15 years, depending upon the amount of HOME funds provided per unit.
(Subsidy) Community Development Block Grant CDBG Community Development Block
Grant Program (CDBG) - The CDBG Program is similar to the HOME program in that the
federal government. Through HUD, it provides dollars to cities, counties, and states each
year. The CDBG program has very broad guidelines, allowing the funds to be directed to a
wide range of activities, including:
• Neighborhood Revitalization projects
• Acquire Property
• Rehab and construct property
• Economic Development projects
• Community Facilities
• Staff Salaries
(Subsidy) Section 108 Loan Program Loan guarantee program that permits entitlement
communities to borrow up to five times their annual CDBG funds as security for a loan. HUD
acts as the guarantor of a Section 108 loan, promising investors that the loan will be repaid.
Section 108 provides the ability to access long-term funds at a fixed rate. Maximum loan
term is 20 years.
(Subsidy) Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) an indirect federal subsidy for qualified
low-income rental housing, made available under Section 42 of the Internal Revenue Code
of 1986. LIHTC is designed to create an incentive for investors, such as private corporations
and banks to invest in affordable housing.
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report W
Appendices
The LIHTC creates "tax credits" that investors can take advantage of, and in turn those
investors provide equity for affordable housing development. The tax credits offset the
investor' s federal income taxes on a dollar -for -dollar basis for a ten-year period. The
federal government annually authorizes the amount of tax credits available to the LIHTC
program. Tax Credits are distributed to the states through an allocation formula, which is
based on state Population. Every State must develop a Qualified Allocation Plan (QAP). The
QAP provides guidelines on how each state will allocate their tax credits. States review
applications under their QAPs to make awards of tax credit allocations to qualified housing
developers who compete for the tax credits.
Credit Percentages
9% Credit:
• New Construction
• Substantial Rehabilitation- Rehab must be $15,000 per unit or higher
• Must compete for credits
4% Credit:
• Acquisition
• New Construction
• Substantial Rehab - Rehab must be $15,000 per unit or higher
• Used to finance Mixed -Income Developments in combination with tax exempt bonds
• Don' t need to compete
• 50% of the cost must be financed with tax exempt bonds
(Subsidy) Historic Tax Credits National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 established the
National Register for Historic Places.
Steps need to ensure project is eligible:
STEP 1: Involves certifying the building as a National Historic Landmark.
STEP 2: Certifying the description of the rehab (submit description of rehab work to state
historic preservation office)
STEP 3: Involves certifying that rehab work is complete per the approved specifications.
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report W
Appendices
(Subsidy) Tax Exempt Bonds Tax-exempt bond financing provides long-term below -market
financing for the construction or rehabilitation of affordable rental housing. Developers
seeking tax-exempt bond financing must first identify a local entity, such as a local
government or public housing authority, to issue the bonds. AHFA reviews applications for
bond financing to ensure the properties meet program guidelines. Bond -financed
properties are also eligible for a 4% federal tax credit. Rents are restricted to 20% of the units
must serve families at 50% AMI or 40% of the units must serve families at 60% AMI. The
remaining units must be no more than 150% of the area median income level.
(Subsidy) Taxable Bonds Local Jurisdictions can issue taxable bonds. Taxable bonds are
typically combined with 9% tax credits. Taxable bonds carry a higher interest rate.
(Subsidy) Rental Assistance Demonstration Program (RAD) Allows projects funded under
the public housing and Section 8 Moderate Rehabilitation (Mod Rehab) programs to convert
their assistance to long-term, project -based Section 8 rental assistance contracts. Under this
component of RAD, public housing agencies (PHAs) owners may choose between two forms
of Section 8 Housing Assistance Payment (HAP) contracts: project -based vouchers (PBVs) or
project -based rental assistance (PBRA). RAD allows Housing Authorities to borrow against
their operating subsidies and Capital Funds. There is no new funding for project
development. Projects typically will not be able to cover cost based on using operating
subsidies and capital funds and therefore will need to also use Low Income Housing Tax
Credits.
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report W
Appendices
B. Briefing Note - Climate Change and Resilience
This document is a collection of the City' s Climate Change and Resilience strategies
mandated by Miami 21. This document is not exhaustive and there are many elements
related to Climate Change mitigation that are not addressed here, such as bike parking
requirements or walkability incentives.
Miami 21
Article 1 - Definitions:
Bioswale: A stormwater planter along the public ROW that captures and filters stormwater
run- off, allowing water to percolate and recharge naturally into the ground, reducing stress
on the greater stormwater drainage network.
Energy conservation zone: A zone located no more than twenty-two (22) feet from a
structure in a one hundred eighty (180) degree band from due east of the northeast point
of the structure, to due south, to due west of the northwest point of the structure.
Extensive Green Roof: An area atop a roof surface of a Building surfaced with soil and Florida
Friendly Landscaping that are appropriate for South Florida green roof systems, including
ground cover, grasses, herbs, and flowering herbaceous plants, which require little or no
maintenance and no permanent irrigation system. This area will serve to retain stormwater
runoff and to mitigate the Heat Island Effect. The depth of the growing medium shall be a
minimum of two (2) inches and a maximum of six (6) inches.
Florida Friendly Landscaping: Describes best practices, materials or actions developed by
the Florida Yards & Neighborhood Program that help to preserve Florida' s natural
resources and protect the environment.
Freeboard: The additional height above the Base Flood Elevation at which the lowest
finished floor is built.
Graywater: That portion of domestic sewage emanating from residential showers,
residential bathroom washbasins, or residential clothes washing machines.
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report M
Appendices
Heat island: An unnaturally high temperature microclimate resulting from radiation from
unshaded impervious surfaces.
Intensive Green Roof: An area atop a roof surface of a Building surfaced with soil and a
variety of Florida -Friendly plants that are appropriate for South Florida green roof systems,
including herbaceous plants and shrubs, and small trees, which require professional
maintenance and an advanced green roof irrigation system. This area will serve the purpose
of retaining stormwater runoff and mitigating the Heat Island Effect. The depth of the
growing medium shall be a minimum of six (6) inches. Rooftop farms, urban roof farms or
vegetable farms on roofs are considered Intensive Green Roofs, requiring higher nutrient
applications and focused maintenance. Rooftop farming areas of an Intensive Green Roof
must be planted with appropriate plan material during non -farming periods.
Native plant species: Plant species with a geographic distribution indigenous to all or part
of Miami -Dade County. Plants which are described as being native to Miami -Dade County
in botanical manuals such as, but not limited to, "A Flora of Tropical Florida" by Long and
Lakela, are native plant species within the meaning of this definition. Plant species which
have been introduced into Miami -Dade County by man are not native plant species.
Stormwater retention/detention area: An area designed, built and used for temporary
storage of stormwater. For purposes of this chapter, these areas are intended to be
permanently exempt from wetland regulations.
Street Tree Master Plan: A guiding document that implements a cohesive and meaningful
vision for a neighborhood roadway street tree program to restore and enhance the City' s
tree canopy into a thriving urban forest that provides multiple aesthetic and environmental
benefits. A plan shall identify the interconnectedness of natural resources and greening
projects as well as sustainable and green infrastructure features.
Xeriscape: A landscaping method that employs drought tolerant plants in an effort to
conserve resources, especially water.
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report
Appendices
Article 2 — General Provisions:
2.1.2 Intent
The Miami 21 Code is intended to advance the interests of both conservation and
development while responding to the existing conditions of the City, its regional context,
and its natural features, infrastructure and Buildings.
a. The conservation goals include:
1. Preserving Neighborhoods, Historical Resources and the natural environment
2. Improving the relationship between low Density Residential neighborhoods
and adjacent Commercial Corridors with appropriate transitions of Density
and Height following the theory of the Transect
3. Increasing access to the natural environment through the Baywalk, the
Riverwalk, the north -south Greenway, and new Parks
4. Conserving energy and reducing carbon dioxide emissions through improved
Thoroughfare connectedness to encourage walkability, bicycling and transit
use
5. Increasing tree canopy
6. Encouraging green Buildings
b. The development goals include:
1. Maintaining the future growth capacity of the City core to ensure its
preeminence as the transit -oriented, pedestrian -friendly focus for the
region' s economic, civic and cultural activities
2. Rebuilding the City' s commercial Corridors to function as Mixed -Use,
transit -oriented, walkable centers for adjacent Residential Neighborhoods
3. Ensuring that private Development contributes to increased infrastructure
capacity, and through building embellishes a pedestrian -friendly public realm
of highest ambient quality
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report W1
Appendices
4. Establishing a rational process for successional growth in areas identified for
density and growth
2.1.3.1 The City - Guiding Principles
a. The City should retain its natural infrastructure and visual character derived from its
location and climate, including topography, landscape and coastline.
b. Growth strategies should encourage Infill and redevelopment.
c. New Development should be structured to reinforce a pattern of Neighborhoods and
urban centers, focusing growth at transit nodes rather than along Corridors.
d. Transportation Corridors should be planned and reserved in coordination with land
Use.
e. Green Corridors should be encouraged and developed to enhance and connect the
urbanized areas.
f. The City should include a framework of transit, pedestrian, and bicycle systems that
provide alternatives to automobile use.
g. A diversity of land use should be distributed throughout the City to enable a variety
of economic activity, workplace, residence, recreation and civic activity.
h. Affordable and Workforce Housing should be distributed throughout the City to
match job opportunities and to avoid concentrations of poverty.
i. The City should expand and enhance transit opportunities and connections
throughout the City.
2.1.3.2 The Community - Guiding Principles
a. Neighborhoods and urban centers should be the preferred pattern of Development
and Transect Zones emphasizing single use should be the exception.
b. Neighborhoods and Urban centers should be compact, pedestrian -oriented and
Mixed -Use. Density and Intensity of Use should relate to degree of transit service.
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report
Appendices
c. The ordinary activities of daily living should occur within walking distance of most
dwellings, allowing independence to those who do not drive.
d. Interconnected networks of Thoroughfares should be designed to disperse and
reduce the length of automobile trips and to encourage walking and bicycling.
e. A range of Open Space, including Parks, Squares and Playgrounds, should be
distributed within Neighborhoods and urban centers.
f. Appropriate building Densities and land uses should occur within walking distance
of transit stops.
g. Civic, Institutional and Commercial activity should be embedded in Mixed -Use urban
centers, not isolated in remote single -use complexes.
h. Schools should be located to enable children to walk or bicycle safely to school. New
schools should not be located on primary Thoroughfares.
i. Within Neighborhoods, a range of housing types and price levels should
accommodate diverse ages and incomes.
2.1.3.3 The Block and the Building - Guiding Principles
a. Buildings and landscaping should contribute to the physical definition of
Thoroughfares as civic places.
b. Development should adequately accommodate vehicles while respecting the
pedestrian and the spatial form of public space.
c. The design of Thoroughfares and Buildings should reinforce safe environments, but
not at the expense of accessibility. Designs should incorporate principles of Crime
Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED).
d. Architecture and landscape design should grow from local climate, topography,
history, and building practice.
e. Buildings should allow their inhabitants to experience the geography and climate
through energy efficient design.
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report M
Appendices
f. Civic Buildings and public gathering places should be located to reinforce community
identity and support self-government.
g. Civic Buildings should be distinctive and appropriate to a role more important than
the other Buildings that constitute the fabric of the City.
h. Preservation and renewal of historic resources should be facilitated to affirm the
continuity of the community.
i. Harmonious and orderly change and Development of urban areas should be enabled
through a form -based zoning code that guides and regulates change.
Article 3 General to Zones:
3.13 SUSTAINABILITY
3.13.1 General
a. Landscape requirements are as required in Article 9 of this Code and the City of Miami
Tree Protection regulations of Chapter 17 of the City Code, except that where this Code is
more restrictive than the Tree Protection regulations, this Code shall apply.
b. All new Buildings of more than 50,000 square feet of Habitable Rooms or Habitable Space
in the T5, T6, Cl and CS zones shall be at a minimum certified as Silver by the United States
Green Building Council (USGBC) Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED)
standards or equivalent standards adopted or approved by the City.
1. At the time of Building Permit application, the owner shall submit:
(a) Proof of registration with the Green Building Certification Institute, or equivalent agency;
(b) A signed and sealed affidavit from a LEED Accredited Professional, or applicable
designation, stating that the proposed Building is designed to achieve the required
certification; and
(c) A LEED Scorecard, or equivalent document, identifying anticipated credits to be achieved.
2. At the time of Certificate of Occupancy application, the owner shall submit:
(a) Proof of certification by the Green Building Certification Institute, or equivalent agency;
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report
Appendices
(b) A bond posted in a form acceptable to the City, in the amount indicated below;
(i) Two percent (2%) of the total cost of construction for a 50,000 - 100,000 square feet
Building;
(ii) Three percent (3%) of the total cost of construction for a 100,001 - 200,000 square feet
Building;
(iii) Four percent (4%) of the total cost of construction for any Building greater than 200,000
square feet; or
(c) Proof of partial compliance from the Green Building Certification Institute, or applicable
agency, which demonstrates the credits presently achieved. In addition, a prorated portion
of the full bond amount, as indicated in subsection 2(b) above, shall be posted based on the
number of remaining credits needed to meet minimum certification requirements. The bond
amount to be posted shall be calculated as follows:
(credits remaining for certification / credits required for certification) x full bond amount =
prorated bond amount
3. Forfeiture of Bond
A bond under this Section 3.13.1 shall be forfeited to the City in the event that the Building
does not meet the for LEED Silver certification or applicable certification. The City will draw
down on the bond funds upon failure of the owner to submit proof of LEED Silver
certification in a form acceptable to the City within one (1) year of the City' s issuance of the
Certificate of Occupancy for the Building. If required certification is not achieved but a
majority of the credits have been verified, the owner shall forfeit a portion of the bond based
on any outstanding credits which shall be calculated as follows:
(credits remaining for certification / credits required for certification) x full bond amount =
bond amount forfeited
If the amount to be forfeited is greater than fifty percent (50%) of the full bond amount, the
bond shall be forfeited in its entirety. Funds that become available to the City from the
forfeiture of the bond shall be placed in the Miami 21 Public Benefits Trust Fund established
by this Code.
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report M
Appendices
c. Affordable Housing Developments that qualify under Section 3.15, may elect to comply
with the sustainability requirements promulgated by the Florida Housing Finance
Corporation, or its successor agency, in lieu of the requirements set forth in Section 3.13.1.b
above.
d. The preservation of Natural Features of land such as trees, vegetation, geological, and
other characteristics and the preservation of features of archaeological significance are
declared to be in the public interest. Said preservation may justify the relaxation of Setbacks
or required Off-street Parking by Waiver. The Zoning Administrator shall determine that the
trees, vegetation, geological and other natural characteristic, or archaeological features are
in the Buildable Area of the Site and not in Setback areas required for the development of
the site.
3.13.2 Heat Island Effect
The intent of this section is to reduce the heat island effect in the City of Miami and to
consequently reduce energy consumption and bills for buildings within the City.
a. Applicability
In all Transect Zones, except T3, the provisions of this section are applicable to all new
construction and to repair or replacement greater than fifty percent (50%) by area of existing
roofs or site Hardscape. All repairs or replacement of existing roofing or Hardscape shall be
reviewed by the Zoning Department for compliance with this section. The following portions
of new or existing roofs are exempted from the requirements of Section 3.13.2:
1. The portion of the roof acting as a substructure for and covered by a rooftop deck,
vegetation associated with an extensive or intensive green roof as defined by the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, or any area of a roof utilized by photovoltaic and solar
equipment.
2. A rooftop deck covering a maximum of 1/3 of the rooftop total gross area.
3. Existing roofs where less than fifty percent (50%) of existing roof area is repaired or
replaced are exempt from the requirements of 3.13.2.c.
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report
Appendices
4. Existing Hardscapes where less than fifty percent (50%) of existing Hardscape area is being
repaired or replaced are exempt from the requirements of 3.13.2.d.
b. Solar Reflectance
1. For roofing materials, all roof exterior surfaces and building materials used to comply with
this section, shall have a minimum Solar Reflectance as specified in sections 3.13.2.c and
3.13.2.d when (i) tested in accordance with ASTM E903 or ASTM E1918, (ii) tested with a
portable reflectometer at near ambient conditions, (iii) labeled by the Cool Roof Rating
Council, or (iv) labeled as an Energy Star qualified roof product. Any product that has been
rated by the Cool Roof Rating Council or by Energy Star shall display a label verifying the
rating of the product.
2. For paving materials, all paving materials used to comply with this section shall have a
minimum solar reflectance as specified in sections 3.13.2.d when (i) tested in accordance
with ASTM E903 or ASTM E1918, (ii) tested with a portable reflectometer at near ambient
conditions, or (iii) default values of Solar Reflectance for listed materials may be used as
fol lows:
Material Solar Reflectance
Typical new gray concrete 0.35
Typical weathered gray concrete 0.20
Typical new white concrete 0.40
Typical weathered white concrete 0.40
New asphalt 0.05
Weathered asphalt
0.10
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report M
Appendices
c. Roof
1. Requirements for Low Sloped Roofs
Roofing materials used in roofs with slopes of a rise of zero (0) units in a horizontal length
(0:12 pitch) up to and including roofs with slopes of a rise of two (2) units in a horizontal
length of 12 units (2:12 units) ( "low -sloped" ) shall meet the following requirements:
(a) Low -sloped roofs constructed as part of a new building shall utilize roofing products that
meet or exceed an initial reflectance value of 0.72 or a three-year installed reflectance value
of 0.5 as determined by the Cool Roof Rating Council or by Energy Star.
(b) Exception. Where more than 50% of the total gross area of the low -sloped roof is covered
with vegetation associated with an extensive or intensive green roof as defined by the US
EPA, the remainder of the roof shall have a reflectance value of a minimum of 0.30 and the
rooftop deck exception in section 3.13.2.a.1 applies.
(c) Exception. Ballasted roofs with a minimum of 15 Ibs/sq. ft. or ballast over the entire roof
surface may have a reflectance value of a minimum of 0.30. For the purposes of this section,
"ballast" shall mean river rock aggregate or larger, pavers or other means of weighing
down a roofing membrane over a substrate to resist wind uplift.
2. Requirements for Steep Sloped Roofs
Roofing materials used in roofs with slopes of a rise greater than two (2) units in a horizontal
length (2:12 pitch) ( "steep -sloped" ) shall meet the following requirements:
(a) Steep sloped roofs shall have an initial Solar Reflectance of 0.15 or greater.
3. Requirements for Roofs with Multiple Slopes
Roofs with multiple slopes shall be subject to those requirements applicable to the slope
which covers the largest area of the building footprint.
g. Non -roof Requirements
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report M
Appendices
1. Provide any combination of the following strategies for fifty percent (50%) of the site
Hardscape:
(a) Shade from solar panels or roofing materials with a Solar Reflectance of at least 0.30.
(b) Shade from trees within five (5) years of occupancy.
(c) Paving materials with a Solar Reflectance of at least 0.30.
(d) Pervious Pavement System.
Lem
2. Place a minimum of fifty -percent (50%) of parking spaces under cover (defined as
underground, under deck, under roof, or under building). Any roof used to shade or cover
parking must have a Solar Reflectance of at least 0.30.
3.14.4.d
Green Building. In a T6 zone, additional Height and FLR shall be allowed for Buildings
certified by the U.S. Green Building Council as follows:
1. Silver: For Buildings under 50,000 sf, 2.0% of the floor lot ratio (FLR)
2. Gold: 4.0% of the Floor Lot Ratio (FLR)
3. Platinum: 13.0% of the Floor Lot Ratio (FLR)
Note: Standards equivalent to the USGBC, as adopted by the City, may alternatively
apply.
Article 5 Specific to Zones:
(Freeboard language exists in T3, T4, T5, and T6. This language specifically relates to T6,
but the language for other transect zones is similar.)
Encroachments shall be as follows: At the First Layer, cantilevered Awnings and entry
canopies may encroach up to one hundred percent (100%) of the depth of the Setback,
except as may be further allowed by Chapter 54 of the City Code. Above the first Story,
cantilevered balconies, bay windows, roofs, or Facade components promoting energy
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report M
Appendices
efficiency, such as shading and Screening devices, that are non -accessible may encroach up
to three (3) feet of the depth of the Setback. Other cantilevered portions of the Building shall
maintain the required Setback. Above the eighth Story when additional setbacks are
required as detailed in Illustration 5.6, Facade components promoting energy efficiency
such as shading and Screening devices, that are non -accessible or balconies may encroach
a maximum of three (3) feet. In the event an existing Building is raised in order to bring the
finished floor elevation above the Base Flood Elevation plus Freeboard, stairs and
ramps required for vertical circulation may encroach one hundred percent (100%) of the
Setback by process of Waiver.
Building Heights shall be measured in Stories and shall conform to Article 4, Table 2 and be
allocated as required in Illustration 5.6. First -floor elevation shall be at average Sidewalk
grade. A first level Residential Function or Lodging Function should be raised a minimum of
two (2) feet and a maximum of three and a half (3.5) feet above average Sidewalk grade for
privacy reasons, or Base Flood Elevation with a minimum of one (1) foot to a maximum of
five (5) feet of Freeboard, whichever is higher. Existing one Story Structures shall be
considered conforming and may be enlarged.
Article 9 Landscape Requirements:
https://codehub.gridics.com/us/fl/miami#/f4fOc8a1-19f6-44ee-81d0-26313c743ca0
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report
Appendices
C. Briefing Note - Quality of Life
This document is a collection of the Quality -of -Life issues encapsulated in Miami 21, as
identified in the resolution creating the Task Force, those items are as follows:
• Comprehensive review of M21 Atlas evaluating development direction of city
neighborhoods.
• Improper abutting transects.
• Preservation of single-family neighborhoods.
• Review of accepted and adopted masterplans and neighborhood plans.
• Development impact on minority and local communities.
• SAP issues.
• Parking requirements.
This document is not exhaustive.
Miami 21
Comprehensive review of M21 Atlas evaluatina development direction of c
neighborhoods:
Access to the Atlas: https:Hgis.miamigov.com/miamizoning/
In the upper left hand corner click on the "Themes" dropdown and select "Miami 21
(Current Zoning)" to view the most updated atlas.
Improper abutting transects:
Article 1: Definitions
Abutting: To reach or touch; to touch at the end or be contiguous with; join at a border or
boundary; terminate on. Abutting properties include properties across a street or alley.
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report
Appendices
Article 3: General to Zones
3.14.1
The bonus shall not be available to properties in a T6 Zone if the property abuts a T3 Zone
or in a T6-8 Zone if the property shares a property line with a CS Zone.
3.15.3
Affordable and Attainable Mixed -Income Housing Developments that are zoned T3 or abut
a T3 Zone are not eligible for the provisions in Section 3.15. Affordable and Attainable
Mixed -Income Housing Developments that abut a T4 Zone shall require a Warrant for
consideration under Section 3.15.
Article 4: Standards and Tables
Article 4 Table 4
DESIGN REVIEW CRITERIA
3911_1011►10 91P101.11111A1►J
• Respond to the physical context taking into consideration natural features, existing urban
form and Transect Zone intentions.
• For Buildings on Corner Lots, design Facades to acknowledge all Frontages.
• For modifications of nonconforming Structures. See also Article 7, Section 7.2 for specific
regulations.
• Create transitions in Height and mass with Abutting properties and Transect Zones.
BUILDING CONFIGURATION
• Articulate the Building Facade vertically and horizontally in intervals appropriate to the
existing Neighborhood and Transect Zone.
• Articulate the Building Facade at street level to recognize pedestrian continuity and
interest, and at upper levels to recognize long views of Buildings.
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report
Appendices
• Use architectural styles and details (such as roof lines and fenestration), colors and
materials derivative from surrounding area.
• Design Facades that respond primarily to human scale.
• Promote pedestrian interaction.
• Design all walls as active Facades, with doors and windows; when not possible, embellish
walls with architectural design treatment.
• Provide usable Open Space that allows for visible and convenient pedestrian access from
the public sidewalk.
• Building sites should locate service elements, such as trash dumpsters, utility meters,
loading docks, backflow preventers, siamese connections and electrical, plumbing,
mechanical and communications equipment away from a street front. All service elements
shall be situated and screened from view to the street and adjacent properties.
BUILDING FUNCTION & DENSITY
• Respond to the Neighborhood context and Transect Zone.
7e1:7:Ih[eL��ehIUe1:7�7.�
• Minimize the impact of automobile parking and driveways on the pedestrian environment
and adjacent properties, especially T3 areas.
• For pedestrian and vehicular safety minimize conflict points such as the number and width
of driveways and curb cuts.
• Minimize off-street parking adjacent to a thoroughfare front and where possible locate
parking behind the Building.
• Design landscaping or surface parking areas as buffers between dissimilar Uses.
• Screen parking garage structures with Habitable Space. Where Habitable Space is not
provided, architectural treatments and landscaping shall screen the garage structure.
LANDSCAPE STANDARDS
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report M
Appendices
• Preserve existing vegetation and/or geological features whenever possible.
• Reinforce Transect Zone intention by integrating landscape and hardscape elements.
• Use landscaping to enhance Building design and continuity of Streetscape.
• Use landscape material, such as plantings, trellises, pavers, screen walls, planters and
similar features, to enhance building design and continuity of streetscape.
• Provide landscaping that screens undesirable elements, such as surface parking lots, and
that enhances open space and architecture.
SIGN STANDARDS
• Provide signage appropriate for the scale and character of the establishment and
immediate Neighborhood.
• Signage shall be within calculated aggregate area appropriate for Transect Zone.
• Signage shall be located below fifty (50) foot height limit along the Building Primary
Frontage.
• Number of Signs for an establishment shall not exceed the allowable amount per linear
Frontage.
• Monument Signs shall be located within the appropriate Setback and not to disrupt
pedestrian activity.
• Illumination and other lighting effects shall not create a nuisance to adjacent property or
create a traffic hazard.
AMBIENT STANDARDS
• Provide lighting appropriate to the Building and landscape design in a manner that
coordinates with signage and street lighting.
• Orient outdoor lighting to minimize glare to the public realm and adjacent properties.
• Protect residential areas from excessive noise, fumes, odors, commercial vehicle intrusion,
traffic conflicts and the spillover effect of light.
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report
Appendices
Article 7: Procedures and nonconformities
Waivers and Warrants require notice of abutting property owners.
Preservation of single-family neighborhoods:
Article 2: General Provisions
2.1.2 Intent
The Miami 21 Code is intended to advance the interests of both conservation and
development while responding to the existing conditions of the City, its regional context,
and its natural features, infrastructure and Buildings.
The conservation goals include:
1. Preserving Neighborhoods, Historical Resources and the natural environment
2. Improving the relationship between low Density Residential neighborhoods and
adjacent Commercial Corridors with appropriate transitions of Density and Height
following the theory of the Transect3.13.1 General
The development goals include:
2. Rebuilding the City' s commercial Corridors to function as Mixed -Use, transit -
oriented, walkable centers for adjacent Residential Neighborhoods
2.1.3.1 The City - Guiding Principles
c. New Development should be structured to reinforce a pattern of Neighborhoods and
urban centers, focusing growth at transit nodes rather than along Corridors.
2.1.3.2 The Community - Guiding Principles
a. Neighborhoods and urban centers should be the preferred pattern of Development and
Transect Zones emphasizing single use should be the exception.
b. Neighborhoods and Urban centers should be compact, pedestrian -oriented and Mixed -
Use. Density and Intensity of Use should relate to degree of transit service.
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report M
Appendices
e. A range of Open Space, including Parks, Squares and Playgrounds, should be distributed
within Neighborhoods and urban centers.
i. Within Neighborhoods, a range of housing types and price levels should accommodate
diverse ages and incomes.
Review of accepted and adopted masterplans and neighborhood plans:
Neighborhood Conservation Districts:
https://codehub.gridics.com/us/fl/miami#/69df85cc-f922-4f5f-99bl-9bb421cf5319
Waterfront Design Guidelines:
https://codehub.gridics.com/us/fl/miami#/80117d52-4069-4169-b7c2-9cbd b12944d5
Midtown Overlay District:
https://codehub.gridics.com/us/fl/miami#/bd8bl5dc-e7db-43af-8le2-151cfe33707b
Miami Worldcenter:
https://codehub.gridics.com/us/fl/miami#/45c6409a-f873-4f7b-8d99-eb443578ac58
Brickell City Center:
https://codehub.gridics.com/us/fl/miami#/7lf28b8f-3ff7-401b-b86f-c9a7cb354eb9
Design District:
https://codehub.gridics.com/us/fl/miami#/e42977f6-aa97-42bl-blbe-c8fa10c682b0
River Landing:
https://codehub.gridics.com/us/fl/miami#/1b9d711f-6a00-4d7d-8895-89c691788c46
River Landing:
https://codehub.gridics.com/us/fl/miami#/f7ecbf4c-Of5d-4ea5-92d3-6fecblf54d4b
Miami River:
httos://codehub.aridics.com/us/fl/miami#/ca159495-bc72-4fld-8fbd-d6d36caee023
Neighborhood Revitalization District 1:
https://codehub.gridics.com/us/fl/miami#/b820e800-8lb0-4984-9884-52234b5e070f
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report
Appendices
MANA SAP:
https://codehub.gridics.com/us/fl/miami#/065d7d2e-4b47-4bd0-8ad1-84ff62e70a21
Miami Jewish Health:
https://codehub.gridics.com/us/fl/miami#/cld429aa-4ee2-4de1-80e4-c63ec5dbcb38
Design Guidelines: http://archive.miamigov.com/planning/designquidelines.html
SAP Issues:
Article 3 General to Zones
3.9 SPECIAL AREA PLANS
The purpose of a Special Area Plan is to allow parcels greater than nine (9) Abutting acres in
size to be master planned so as to allow greater integration of public improvements and
Infrastructure, and greater flexibility so as to result in higher or specialized quality building
and Streetscape design within the Special Area Plan.
The purpose of a Special Area Plan further is to encourage the assembly and master planning
of parcels greater than nine (9) Abutting acres in size, in order to provide greater integration
of public and private improvements and Infrastructure; to enable Thoroughfare connectivity;
to encourage a variety of Building Heights, massing and Streetscape design, and to provide
high quality design elements, all in order to further the intent of this Code expressed in
Article 2.
3.9.1 General
a. The single or multiple owner(s) of Abutting properties in excess of nine (9) acres may
apply for a rezoning to a Special Area Plan.
b. A Special Area Plan shall be approved by the process of rezoning with or without
Transect changes. Properties designated as 73" — Sub -Urban Transect Zone shall
not be considered for a Special Area Plan.
c. A Special Area Plan shall assign Thoroughfares, Transect Zones and Civic Space
Types, with appropriate transitions to Abutting areas. Guidelines for Thoroughfares
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report M
Appendices
and Public Frontages may be adjusted to the particular circumstances of the Special
Area Plan.
d. A Special Area Plan shall include a map of the Thoroughfares and Transect Zones,
and the standards that deviate from the requirements of Article 5.
e. A Special Area Plan shall assign at least five percent (5%) of its aggregated Lot Area
to a Civic Space Type. Civic Building sites are to be located within or adjacent to Civic
Space Types or at the axial termination of significant Thoroughfares. The developer
shall be responsible forconstructing the public improvements within the Special Area
Plan, including but not limited to the Civic Space Types and Thoroughfares.
f. Development within the Special Area Plan shall be pursuant to a recorded
development agreement that will establish the allocation of Thoroughfares and Civic
Space Types and Building Area among the Building sites, and the creation and
retention of the public benefits.
g. Unless a Building is specifically approved as part of the Special Area Plan, any Building
shall be reviewed by the Planning Director, after referral to and recommendation
from the CRC for conformance to the Plan, prior to issuance of the Building Permit.
h. A Special Area Plan may include:
1. A differentiation of the Thoroughfares as a Primary -Grid (A -Grid) and a
Secondary -Grid (B-Grid). Buildings along the A -Grid shall be held to the
highest standard of this Code in support of pedestrian activity. Buildings along
the B-Grid may be more readily considered for automobile -oriented
standards allowing surface parking lots, unlined parking decks, and drive-
throughs. The Frontages assigned to the B-Grid shall not exceed thirty percent
(30%) of the total length within a Special Area Plan. For Frontages on the B-
Grid, parking areas may be allowed in the Second Layer.
2. Retail Frontage requiring that a Building provide a Commercial Use at
sidewalk level along the entire length of the Frontage. The Commercial Use
Building shall be no less than seventy percent (70%) glazed in clear glass and
provided with an Awning overlapping the sidewalk as generally illustrated in
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report M
Appendices
Article 4, Table 6. The first floor should be confined to Retail Use through the
depth of the Second Layer.
3. Gallery or Arcade Frontage, requiring that a Building provide a permanent
cover over the sidewalk, either cantilevered or supported by columns. The
Gallery or Arcade Frontage may be combined with a Retail Frontage as shown
in Article 4, Table 6. Gallery or Arcade Frontage within the First Layer may apply
towards Open Space requirements.
4. Build -to -lines that differ from Transect Zone Setback requirement.
5. A Terminated Vista location, requiring that the Building be provided with
architectural articulation of a Type and character that responds to the location.
6. A Pedestrian Passage, requiring a minimum ten (10) foot wide pedestrian
access be reserved between Buildings.
7. A preservation plan acceptable to the Historic and Environmental Preservation
Board for any historic resources in the area of the Special Area Plan.
8. Area Design Guidelines.
9. A parking management program that enables shared parking among public
and private Uses.
10. Flexible allocation of development capacity and Height, excluding Density on
individual sites within the Special Area Plan shall be allowed so long as the
capacity or Height distribution does not result in development that is out of
Scale or character with the surrounding area, and provides for appropriate
transitions.
Article 7 Procedures and Nonconformities
7.1.2.8 Amendment to Miami 21 Code
a. Successional Zoning. The City' s growth and evolution over time will inevitably require
changes to the boundaries of certain Transect Zones. These changes shall occur
successionally, in which the zoning change may be made only to a lesser Transect Zone;
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report M
Appendices
within the same Transect Zone to a greater or lesser intensity; or to the next higher Transect
Zone, or through a Special Area Plan. All changes shall maintain the goals of this Code to
preserve Neighborhoods and to provide transitions in Intensity, Density, Building Height
and Scale.
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report W
Appendices
D. Briefing Note - Prosperity
This document is a collection of the City' s Prosperity strategies mandated by Miami 21.
This document is not exhaustive and there are many elements related to Prosperity that are
not addressed here.
Miami 21
Article 1 - Definitions:
Adaptive Use: Rehabilitation or renovation of existing Building(s) for any Use(s) other than
the present Use.
Bicycle Lane: A lane dedicated for bicycle use demarcated by striping or otherwise
separated from vehicle lanes.
Bicycle Rack Space: Parking space for any two wheel alternative mode of transportation
including: bicycle, scooter, motorcycle, Segway®, etc.
Bicycle Route: A Thoroughfare designated for shared use of bicycles and automobiles.
Bicycle Shed: An area, approximately circular, that is centered on a common destination,
reachable by bicycle. A Bicycle Shed for purposes of connecting to transit and mapping a
Transit Oriented Development ( "TOD" ) is a five (5) minute ride at a leisurely pace. The area
of the Bicycle Shed is dependent on the type and connectedness of barrier -free bicycle
routes available. Five -minutes of travel is equivalent to one-half (1/2) mile when no
dedicated space for bicycles are available; three-quarter (3/4) mile when improvements like
bicycle lanes or shared -use paths are available; and one (1) mile when premium facilities like
linear parks, the Riverwalk, Baywalk, or separated lanes are available for travel. The City' s
Bicycle Master Plan further identifies types of bicycle facilities. The outline of the Bicycle Shed
must be refined according to actual site conditions and is subject to change as additional
bicycle facilities are added. (Sometimes referred to as Bikeshed" ).
Block: The aggregate of private Lots, passages, rear lanes and Alleys, the perimeter of which
abuts Thoroughfares.
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report M
Appendices
Block Face: The aggregate of all the Building Facades on one side of a block. The Block Face
provides the context for establishing architectural harmony.
Childcare: A facility where six (6) or more children are cared for on a part-time basis by day
or by night including after -school care. The term does not include community based
residential facilities, Family Care Homes, foster homes, group homes, rehabilitation or
detention centers, orphanages, or other places operating primarily for remedial care.
See Article 6.
College / University: A facility for post -secondary education that grants associate, bachelor,
master or doctoral degrees, and may include research functions or professional schools.
Elementary School: A facility offering instruction at the elementary school level.
FEC Corridor Greenway (Flagler Trail): A linear pedestrian and bicycle pathway along the
Florida East Coast Rail line corridor.
Greenway: An Open Space Corridor in largely natural condition which may include paths for
bicycles and pedestrians. See Article 4, Table 7.
Learning Center: A facility offering to students training, tutoring or instruction in subjects
such as languages, music, fine arts or dance. This may include provision of electronic testing
and distance learning.
Middle / High School: A facility offering instruction at the middle or high school level.
Navigable Waterway: The navigable part of a waterway, centrally located with respect to the
theoretical axis of the waterway (or the axis of the improved channel of the Miami River)
which provides a throughway or access aisle for manned vessels.
Paseo: An access way limited to pedestrian use connecting streets, plazas, alleys, garages
and other existing and future public spaces abutting a property. A Paseo shall have a clear
path of a minimum of ten (10) feet in width that is restricted to pedestrian use and lined with
active uses having frequent doors and windows. A Paseo may be roofed above the first floor
for (100%) of its length, but any roof portion of Paseo shall not be counted as Open Space.
Pedestrian Orientation: The characteristics of an area where the location and access to
Buildings, types of Uses permitted on the street level, and storefront design relate to the
needs of persons traveling on foot.
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report W
Pedestrian Passage: An Open Space connecting other public spaces, that is restricted to
pedestrian use and limited vehicular access that connects Thoroughfares, Plazas, Alleys,
Garages and other public use spaces, Pedestrian Passage shall have frequent doors and
windows.
Pedestrian Shed: An area, approximately circular, that is centered on a common destination.
A Pedestrian Shed is applied to determine the approximate size of a Neighborhood. A
Standard Pedestrian Shed is a barrier -free area interconnected by sidewalks and crosswalks
with a one -quarter (1/4) mile travel distance from the common destination. This is about the
distance of a five-minute walk at a leisurely pace. A Linear Pedestrian Shed is elongated to
follow a commercial corridor, measuring one -quarter (1/4) mile out from the center line of
the corridor. It has been shown that provided with a pedestrian environment, most people
will walk this distance rather than drive. The outline of the shed must be refined according
to actual site conditions, particularly along Thoroughfares. The common destination should
have the present or future capacity to accommodate Transect Zones successional in Density
to its surroundings. (Sometimes called a "walkshed" or "walkable catchment" ).
Personal Wireless Service Facility (PWSF): A facility for the provision of personal wireless
services, as defined by the Federal Telecommunications Act of 1996. A PWSF is any facility
for the transmission or reception of personal wireless services, which may consist of an
antenna array, transmission cables, equipment shelter or Building, access road, mount, and
a guy system. Such facilities may include "monopole" or "lattice tower (tower)"
Structures. See Section 1.1, (Civil Support, Infrastructure and Utilities), and Article 6.
Pre -School: A facility offering care and instruction of children who are pre -elementary
school age.
Research Facility: A facility for research and development that does not involve the use of
human testing, animal husbandry, incinerators, heavy equipment, mass manufacturing,
fabrication, processing, or sale of products. Any facility involving human testing, animal
husbandry, and the use of incinerators shall be considered a Major Facility.
Shared Parking Standards: An accounting for parking spaces that are available to more than
one function.
Special Training / Vocational: A facility offering instruction or training in trades or
occupations such as secretarial, paralegal, business, beauty, barber, bartender, acupuncture,
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report
Appendices
massage, design, fine arts, music and dance or other similar vocations. This classification
excludes training and education in any activity that is not otherwise permitted in the zone.
Transit Corridor: A designation established by the City involving an area not exceeding a
one -quarter (1/4) mile radius from a non -limited access thoroughfare that included
designated transit stop locations and is served by one or more mass transit route(s) with
designated transit vehicle(s) operating at an average of ten (10) minute or less headway
Monday thru Friday between the hours of 7am thru 7pm. Multiple transit routes or types of
transit vehicles may be added cumulatively under this definition for the purpose of parking
reductions.
Transit Oriented Development (TOD): A designation established by the City within the
Pedestrian Shed or Bicycle Shed area of a convergence of modes of transit, or a train station.
Article 2 — General Provisions:
2.1.2 Intent
The Miami 21 Code is intended to advance the interests of both conservation and
development while responding to the existing conditions of the City, its regional context,
and its natural features, infrastructure and Buildings.
c. The development goals include:
1. Maintaining the future growth capacity of the City core to ensure its
preeminence as the transit -oriented, pedestrian -friendly focus for the
region' s economic, civic and cultural activities
2. Rebuilding the City' s commercial Corridors to function as Mixed -Use,
transit -oriented, walkable centers for adjacent Residential Neighborhoods
3. Ensuring that private Development contributes to increased infrastructure
capacity, and through building embellishes a pedestrian -friendly public realm
of highest ambient quality
4. Establishing a rational process for successional growth in areas identified for
density and growth
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report M
Appendices
2.1.3.1 The City - Guiding Principles
j. The City should retain its natural infrastructure and visual character derived from its
location and climate, including topography, landscape and coastline.
k. Growth strategies should encourage Infill and redevelopment.
I. New Development should be structured to reinforce a pattern of Neighborhoods and
urban centers, focusing growth at transit nodes rather than along Corridors.
m. Transportation Corridors should be planned and reserved in coordination with land
Use.
n. Green Corridors should be encouraged and developed to enhance and connect the
urbanized areas.
o. The City should include a framework of transit, pedestrian, and bicycle systems that
provide alternatives to automobile use.
p. A diversity of land use should be distributed throughout the City to enable a variety
of economic activity, workplace, residence, recreation and civic activity.
q. Affordable and Workforce Housing should be distributed throughout the City to
match job opportunities and to avoid concentrations of poverty.
r. The City should expand and enhance transit opportunities and connections
throughout the City.
2.1.3.2 The Community - Guiding Principles
j. Neighborhoods and urban centers should be the preferred pattern of Development
and Transect Zones emphasizing single use should be the exception.
k. Neighborhoods and Urban centers should be compact, pedestrian -oriented and
Mixed -Use. Density and Intensity of Use should relate to degree of transit service.
I. The ordinary activities of daily living should occur within walking distance of most
dwellings, allowing independence to those who do not drive.
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report M
Appendices
m. Interconnected networks of Thoroughfares should be designed to disperse and
reduce the length of automobile trips and to encourage walking and bicycling.
n. A range of Open Space, including Parks, Squares and Playgrounds, should be
distributed within Neighborhoods and urban centers.
o. Appropriate building Densities and land uses should occur within walking distance
of transit stops.
p. Civic, Institutional and Commercial activity should be embedded in Mixed -Use urban
centers, not isolated in remote single -use complexes.
q. Schools should be located to enable children to walk or bicycle safely to school. New
schools should not be located on primary Thoroughfares.
r. Within Neighborhoods, a range of housing types and price levels should
accommodate diverse ages and incomes.
2.1.3.3 The Block and the Building - Guiding Principles
a. Buildings and landscaping should contribute to the physical definition of
Thoroughfares as civic places.
b. Development should adequately accommodate vehicles while respecting the
pedestrian and the spatial form of public space.
c. The design of Thoroughfares and Buildings should reinforce safe environments, but
not at the expense of accessibility. Designs should incorporate principles of Crime
Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED).
d. Architecture and landscape design should grow from local climate, topography,
history, and building practice.
e. Buildings should allow their inhabitants to experience the geography and climate
through energy efficient design.
f. Civic Buildings and public gathering places should be located to reinforce community
identity and support self-government.
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report M
Appendices
g. Civic Buildings should be distinctive and appropriate to a role more important than
the other Buildings that constitute the fabric of the City.
h. Preservation and renewal of historic resources should be facilitated to affirm the
continuity of the community.
i. Harmonious and orderly change and Development of urban areas should be enabled
through a form -based zoning code that guides and regulates change.
Article 3 General to Zones:
3.6 OFF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING STANDARDS
3.6.1 Off-street Parking Standards
a. Off-street Parking requirements for the individual Transect Zones shall be as set forth
in Article 4, Table 4. Where required off-street parking is based on square footage of Use,
the calculation shall only include Habitable Rooms and Habitable Space occupied by
such Use.
b. Off-street Parking dimensions and Shared Parking (mixed -use) reduction table shall be
as set forth in Article 4, Table 5.
c. Required Parking for Adaptive Reuses may be reduced or exempted by Waiver for
properties located in a Community Redevelopment Area, or in areas where a Parking
Trust Fund has been established, or for historic sites and contributing Structures within
designated historic districts.
d. Parking reductions shall not be cumulative except in T6-36, T6-48, T6-60 and T6-80.
Parking reductions shall not exceed fifty percent (50%) of the total Off-street Parking
required, except for Residential components of projects within one thousand (1,000) feet
of Metrorail or Metromover stations.
e. Parking that is otherwise not allowed but that is customarily incidental and subordinate
to a principal Use may be provided in any T3 or T4-R Transect Zone by process of
Exception and only if there is an existing legally built parking lot. Access for such Lots
shall be subject to all other requirements of the Transect Zone including Liner,
landscaping, or Streetscreen requirements. Such parking shall not expand or increase
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report M
Appendices
the degree of nonconformity. Parking in other Transect Zones shall be approved
pursuant to Article 4, Table 3.
f. 20% of all newly constructed parking spaces must be EV Capable. In no case will this be
less than one (1) required space and the calculated number shall always be rounded up
for any fraction of a space. This requirement does not apply to dwellings without a
designated parking space located on the premises nor does this requirement apply to
parking spaces located in the public right-of-way.
3.6.9 Off-street Loading Requirements
g. Off-street vehicular loading shall be required for all T5, T6, CS, Cl, CI -HD and D zones, as
shown in Article 4, Table 5 and shall require no more than three (3) turning movements.
3.6.10 Off-street Bicycle Parking Requirements
a. Off-street bicycle parking shall be provided for all T4, T5, T6, CS, Cl, CI -HD, and D zones,
as shown in Article 4, Table 4 and shall be calculated prior to any vehicular parking
reductions.
b. Within TOD areas, required bicycle parking shall be provided as both Short -Term Bicycle
Parking and Long -Term Bicycle Parking as described within the Miami Bicycle Master
Plan.
1. Short -Term Bicycle Parking may be located within the public ROW or a required
Setback, within 200 feet of the building' s entrance.
2. Long -Term Bicycle Parking shall be located within a built structure subject to the
standards outlined below.
c. Required bicycle parking shall meet the following standards:
1. Required bicycle parking shall be provided in a safe, accessible and convenient
location.
2. Bicycle parking facilities shared by more than one use are encouraged.
3. Required bicycle parking facilities may be located within the project site or in a
shared bicycle parking facility subject to all the conditions for shared bicycle parking
facilities below:
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report M
Appendices
a. Required bicycle parking spaces for two (2) or more adjacent sites may be
satisfied by the same bicycle parking facility used jointly provided that such right
of joint use and maintenance is evidenced by covenant running with the land or
equivalent legal document establishing the joint use.
b. Required shared bicycle parking facilities are to be located within 300 feet of any
building' s main entrance.
c. The minimum number of required bicycle parking is satisfied by all sites using the
shared facility.
d. For the purposes of this section, shared bicycle parking facilities are areas,
locations, or structures designed to accommodate, house, store, maintain or hold
several bicycle parking spaces.
4. When required off-street vehicular parking is covered, the required bicycle parking
shall also be covered.
5. When required bicycle parking is provided in racks, one (1) standard U-rack will
accommodate two (2) bikes and each rack must meet the following standards:
a. The bicycle frame and one (1) wheel can be locked to the rack with a high security,
U-shaped shackle lock if both wheels are left on the bicycle;
b. A bicycle six feet long can be securely held with its frame supported so that the
bicycle cannot be pushed or fall in a manner that will damage the wheels or
components; and
c. The rack must be securely anchored.
6. When required bicycle parking is provided in lockers, the lockers must be securely
anchored.
7. Parking and maneuvering areas.
a. Each required bicycle parking space must be accessible without moving another
bicycle;
b. There must be an aisle of at least five (5) feet wide behind all required bicycle
parking to allow room for bicycle maneuvering;
c. The area devoted to bicycle parking must be hard surfaced.
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report M
Appendices
8. A one (1) square foot directional sign shall be required if the bicycle parking area is
not visible from the street or main building entrance. Said sign must be posted at the
main building entrance indicating the location of the bicycle parking.
3.8 THOROUGHFARES
3.8.1 General Principles
a. Thoroughfares are intended for use by vehicular, transit, bicycle, and pedestrian traffic
and to provide access to Lots and Open Spaces.
b. Thoroughfares consist of lanes for vehicles, transit, bicycles and Public Frontages. The
lanes may have a variety of widths for movement and parking. The Public Frontages
contribute to the character of Transect Zones. They may include swales, Sidewalks,
curbing, Planters, bicycle paths and street trees. See Article 4, Tables 6 and 8.
c. Thoroughfares should be designed in context with the urban form and desired design
speed of the Transect Zones through which they pass. The Public Frontages that pass
from one Transect Zone to another should be adjusted accordingly.
d. Bicycles are a sustainable and viable mode of transportation and recreation in the City
of Miami. Bicycle use of Thoroughfares should be as follows: Bicycles and vehicles may
share use of lanes on all Thoroughfares. Thoroughfares that have sufficient paving width
to accommodate bicyclists' safety should include dedicated Bicycle Lanes. Greenways,
waterfront walks and other Civic Spaces should include Bicycle usage.
e. A City-wide bicycle plan may designate an interconnected network serving bicyclists
with a series of marked routes that include Bicycle Lanes as well as Bicycle Routes that
give bicycles priority, such as those Thoroughfares which parallel major corridors or
include major corridors which can be reconfigured to limit conflicts between vehicles
and bicycles.
f. Pedestrian comfort should be a primary consideration of Thoroughfare design and
dimensions. Design conflict between vehicular, bicycle and pedestrian movement
should be decided in favor of the pedestrian.
3.8.2 Thoroughfares
a. The guidelines for Thoroughfares are as described in Article 8.
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report
Appendices
b. The Thoroughfare network should be designed to prioritize connectivity, defining Blocks
not exceeding an average perimeter length of 1,320 feet. The length shall be measured
as the sum of Lot Frontage Lines. Thoroughfare closings should not be allowed; instead,
traffic calming designs should be deployed to control traffic volume and speed.
c. All Thoroughfares should terminate at other Thoroughfares, to forma network. Cul-de-
sacs should be permitted only when supported by natural site conditions. Thoroughfares
that provide View Corridors shall not be vacated.
d. In T5 and T6 Zones, Public and Private Frontages should be coordinated with a single
paving and landscape design as provided in Article 4, Table 6 and Article 8.
8.1 GENERAL DESCRIPTION
This article describes the guidelines for development of Thoroughfares throughout the City.
It supplements the design standards adopted in the City of Miami Manual of Engineering
Standards for Design and Construction, maintained in its most current form at the City of
Miami Department of Public Works. Where these guidelines conflict with the Manual, the
standards of the Manual shall apply.
The urban landscape is characterized by a set of interdependent elements that create a
sense of place. These include Thoroughfare type, Building type, Frontage type, and the form
and disposition of landscape and lighting. Thoroughfares provide the City with both the
major part of public Open Space as well as moving lanes for vehicles, bicycles and transit. A
Thoroughfare is associated with a particular type of movement, and is endowed with two
attributes: movement type and character. The movement type of the Thoroughfare refers to
the number of vehicles that can move safely through a segment within a given time period;
it is physically manifested by the number of lanes and their width, by the centerline radius,
the curb radius, and the super -elevation of the pavement. The character of the Thoroughfare
refers to its suitability as a setting for pedestrian activities and is physically manifested by
the associated Frontage types as determined by location within the Transect.
Thoroughfares can be assigned appropriately to Transect Zones, with calibrated Right -of
Way widths, movement types, design speed, number of travel lanes, pavement width, curb
radius and Verge type.
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report
Appendices
In Zones T3 and T4, D1, D2 and D3, generally sidewalks occur at the edge of the Right -of -
Way. In Zones T5 and T6, sidewalks occur at the edge of the Right -of -Way and are given the
additional dimensions of the 10 foot setback in the First Layer.
The following additional assumptions govern the Thoroughfares shown here:
• To clear sight lines for drivers, Visibility Triangles shall be required as described in Article
3, Section 3.8.4.1
Pavement widths are measured inside of curb to inside of curb.
• Curb and gutter may range from 1' -6" for City Thoroughfares to 2' -0" for some
County Thoroughfares.
• Parking spaces range from 7' -0" to 9' -0" including pan; they should be wider on
higher speed Thoroughfares but may be restricted by existing Right -of -Way dimensions.
Right turns may be taken from the parking lane.
Tree spacing is 22' on center to match parallel parking or 25' on center to match Lot
Line spacing.
Tree planters have a minimum dimension of 4' x 4' , increased where possible to a 4'
x 8' dimension.
• Bulb -outs may be added where Thoroughfare widths are wide and design speed high,
or where sidewalks are narrow, in order to facilitate pedestrian safety.
Thoroughfares must evolve with the needs of the City. As Miami continues to grow, a
Thoroughfare may change in character reflecting new density, or conversely, a return to an
historic dimension. For instance, a continuous lawn planter may be replaced with individual
tree wells for additional sidewalk space, or a wide neighborhood street may be narrowed to
control traffic intrusion.
The accommodation of bicycles and transit requires detailed response to the existing
Thoroughfare condition and thus is not illustrated specifically here.
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report
Appendices
E. Briefing Note - Service
This document is a collection of the Service strategies mandated by Miami 21. This
document is not exhaustive and there are many elements related to Service that are not
addressed here.
Miami 21
Article 1 - Definitions:
Layer: A range of depth of a Lot within which certain elements are permitted as regulated in
this Code. See Article 4, Table 8, Diagram D.
Layer, First: The area of a Lot comprised of the distance between the Base Building Line and
the required Setback including the Private Frontage.
Layer, Second: That portion of the Lot behind the First Layer which includes that portion of
the Building which Enfronts the Thoroughfare.
Layer, Third: That portion of the Lot that is not within the First and Second Layer and is least
visible from the Thoroughfare.
Article 7 General to Zones:
7.1.2 Permits
The permits that may be necessary to develop property under the Miami 21 Code include
the following: Warrant; Waiver; Exception; Variance; and amendment to the Code (including
text amendments, rezoning and Special Area Plans). The permits are illustrated in Article 7,
Diagram 14. In addition, certain approvals may be necessary to confirm that uses are
permitted uses under the Code, which are zoning approval (by right), certificate of use,
planning determination, or zoning interpretation. Permits issued in error shall convey no
rights to any party. The Zoning Administrator shall require corrections to be made unless
construction has commenced on that portion of the construction that was permitted in
error.
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report M
Appendices
7.1.2.4 Warrant
The Warrant permits those Uses listed in Article 4, Table 3 of this Code as requiring a
Warrant, upon review by the Planning Director or with the additional review of the
Coordinated Review Committee.
a. Prior to submitting an application for a Warrant, the prospective applicant shall meet in a
preapplication meeting with the Zoning Administrator and the Planning Director to obtain
information and guidance as to matters related to the proposed application.
b. Required notice and hearing.
At the time of submitting the application to the Department of Planning, the applicant shall
notify all Abutting property owners, including those across a street or alley, by certified mail.
In the case of Abutting condominiums, only one notice to the condominium association
need be sent.
Additionally, at the time of submitting the application, the applicant shall obtain from the
Department of Planning the list of all registered Neighborhood and homeowner
associations within the NET office that is applicable to applicant property and shall notify
the NET office, and official representatives of all such registered associations, by certified
mail, of the application. Neighborhood and homeowner associations who wish to receive
such notice must register on an annual basis at their local NET offices.
The applicant shall submit the certified receipts from all notices to the Department of
Planning at the time of application. The decision on a Warrant shall be posted on the City
website within five (5) days of the written decision.
c. Review and approval process.
1. The Planning Director shall review each submitted application for a Warrant for
completeness. If the Warrant application involves a project in excess of two hundred
thousand (200,000) square feet of floor area, it shall be referred to the Coordinated Review
Committee, which shall review the application and provide its comments and
recommendations to the Planning Director.
2. Applications for projects equal to or less than two hundred thousand (200,000) square
feet of floor area shall be reviewed by the Planning Director and the Zoning Administrator
without need for review by the Coordinated Review Committee, unless the Planning Director
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report
determines that review by the Coordinated Review Committee is necessary. Where there is
no referral to the Coordinated Review Committee, the Planning Director shall issue an
intended decision within twenty-one (21) calendar days of a determination that the
application is complete. The applicant shall have seven (7) calendar days from receipt of the
notice of the intended decision to request a conference with the Planning Directorto discuss
revisions or additional information regarding the application. Within ten (10) calendar days
of the conference, or if no conference is requested, the Planning Director shall issue written
findings and determinations regarding the applicable criteria set forth in this section and
any other applicable regulations. The applicant and the Planning Director may mutually
consent to an extension of the time for issuance of the final decision. The findings and
determinations shall be used to approve, approve with conditions or deny the Warrant
application.
3. The Planning Director shall approve, approve with conditions or deny the Warrant
application, but in no event shall a Warrant be issued prior to thirty (30) days from the time
the notice of the application is provided to the NET office. Approvals shall be granted when
the application complies with all applicable regulations; conditional approvals shall be
issued when the applications require conditions in order to be found in compliance with all
applicable regulations; denials of applications shall be issued if after conditions and
safeguards have been considered, the application still fails to comply with all applicable
regulations. The decision of the Director shall include an explanation of the code
requirements for an appeal of the decision and shall be provided to the NET office which
shall, within five (5) days, distribute the Warrant to the official representatives of all
registered neighborhood and homeowner associations within the NET office that is
applicable to the applicant property, and the City shall post on the City' s website. The
Director shall include a citation to the legal authority for any denial of a Warrant.
4. A Warrant shall be valid for a period of two (2) years during which a building permit or
Certificate of Use must be obtained. This excludes a demolition or landscape permit. A one
time extension, for a period not to exceed an additional year, may be obtained if approved
by the Planning Director.
d. Review criteria.
As appropriate to the nature of the Warrant involved and the particular circumstances of the
case, the following criteria shall apply to a Warrant application. The application shall be
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report M
Appendices
reviewed for compliance with this Code. The review shall consider the intent of the Transect,
the guiding principles of the Miami 21 Code, and the manner in which the proposed Use will
operate given its specific location and proximity to less intense Uses. The review shall also
apply Article 4, Table 12, Design Review Criteria, as applicable
e. Appeal to the Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board.
Appeal of the determination of the Planning Director shall be de novo and taken to the
Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board. An appeal shall be filed with the Hearing Boards Office
within fifteen (15) calendar days of the posting of decision by the Planning Director on the
City' s website. The Board shall determine whether the Warrant is upheld or rescinded.
The ruling of the Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board may be further appealed to the City
Commission, de novo and must be filed with the Office of Hearing Boards within fifteen (15)
calendar days of the Board' s issuance of its ruling.
The filing of the appeal shall state the specific reasons for such appeal, together with
payment of any required fee. The appeal may be filed only by the applicant or any person
who is aggrieved by the action of the Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board.
7.1.2.5 Waiver
The Waiver permits specified minor deviations from the Miami 21 Code, as provided in the
various articles of this Code and as consistent with the guiding principles of this Code.
Waivers are intended to relieve practical difficulties in complying with the strict requirements
of this Code. Waivers are not intended to relieve specific cases of financial hardship, nor to
allow circumventing of the intent of this Code. A Waiver may not be granted if it conflicts
with the City Code or the Florida Building Code.
a. Specific Waivers are described in the various articles of this Code, and are referenced here
only for convenience. The specific parameters of each Waiver are further described in the
articles in which each Waiver appears in this Code.
1. Parking reductions for Elderly Housing or for Adaptive Reuses in Community
Redevelopment Areas (Article 3, Section 3.6.1 and 3.6.7).
2. Setbacks for irregular Lots (Article 3, Section 3.3.3.c)
3. Setbacks for the property to be developed to match the dominant Setback in the Block
and its Context. (Article 3, Section 3.3.5; Article 5, Sections 5.5.1.g, 5.6.1.g and 5.8.1.g)
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report M
Appendices
4. Shared Access for adjoining Lots (Article 3, Section 3.6.3.k).
5. Barbed wire fences in D1, D2 and D3 (Article 3, Section 3.7.2).
6. Review of Development within Neighborhood Conservation Districts for compliance with
NCD regulations (Appendix A).
7. The relaxation of Setbacks or required Off-street Parking for preservation of natural
features of land (Article 3, Section 3.13.1.d).
8. Decrease of required parking by thirty percent (30%) within the half -mile radius of a TOD
(Article 4, Table 4).
9. Reduction of setbacks for one-story, non -habitable accessory structures in T3. (Article 5,
Section 5.3.1.h)
10. Substitution of loading berths (Article 4, Table 5).
11. Required parking within one thousand (1,000) feet of the site that it serves (Article 4,
Table 4)
12. Extensions above maximum Heights for church spires, steeples, belfries, monuments,
water towers, flagpoles, vents, ornamental Building features, decorative elements, or similar
Structures. (Article 3, Section 3.5.3, Article 5, Sections 5.3.2.f; 5.4.2.g; 5.5.2.h; 5.6.2.h, 5.9.2.g
and 5.10.2.g).
13. Encroachment of mechanical equipment, such as air conditioning units, pumps, exhaust
fans or other similar noise producing equipment for existing Buildings (Article 5,
Sections 5.3.2.d and 5.4.2.d).
14. Service and Parking access from Principal Frontage (Article 5, Sections 5.4.2.e, 5.5.2.e
and 5.6.2.f).
15. Pedestrian and vehicular entry spacing. (Article 5, Section 5.5.1.f, 5.5.4.e, 5.6.1.f
and 5.6.4.g).
16. Adjustments to Building spacing and to Setbacks above the eighth floor for Lots having
one dimension one hundred (100) feet or less (Article 5, Section 5.6.1.h).
17. Adjustments to Building Disposition in Cl. (Article 5, Section 5.7.2.4.d).
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report M
Appendices
18. Industrial Uses requiring additional Height in D2 and D3 (Article 5, Section 5.9.2.f
and 5.10.2.f).
19. Primary and Secondary Frontage Parking placement (Article 5,
Sections 5.5.4.d, 5.5.4.e, 5.6.4.d and 5.6.4.e).
20. Reduction of reservoir parking space (Article 6).
21. Gas Station Building Frontage requirement (Article 6).
22. Modifications in Setbacks up to fifty percent (50%) when Liner Uses are provided along
parking Structures in Major Sports Facility. (Article 6, Table 13).
23. Replacement or reconstruction of a nonconforming Structure (other than Single -Family,
duplex or multi -family) destroyed by natural disaster, explosion, fire, act of God, orthe public
enemy. (Article 7, Section 7.2.2.b).
24. Alterations to nonconforming Single Family or duplex Structures to enlarge a
nonconformity affecting the exterior of the Building or premises. (Article 7, Section 7.2.3).
25. Development of Single Family or duplex Structures on certain nonconforming Lots in T-
3 zones. (Article 7. Section 7.2.7).
26. Modification to nonconforming Off-street Parking facilities involving restoration or
rehabilitation of an existing Building or an adaptive Use. (Article 7, Section 7.2.8).
27. Modification of the landscaping of nonconforming signs. (Article 7, Section 7.2.9.5).
28. Encroachment of stairs and ramps into the setback for existing buildings being raised
above the Base Flood Elevation plus Freeboard. (Article 5, Sections 5.3.2.b, 5.4.2.b, 5.5.2.b,
and 5.6.2.c)
29. As appropriate to the nature of the Waiver involved and the particular circumstances of
the case, Waivers up to ten percent (10%) of any particular standard of this Code except
Density, Intensity and Height, may be granted when doing so promotes the intent of the
particular Transect Zone where the proposal is located; is consistent with the guiding
principles of this Code; and there is practical difficulty in otherwise meeting the standards of
the Transect Zone, or when doing so promotes energy conservation and Building
sustainability. The inability to achieve maximum Density, Height, or floor plate for the
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report El
Appendices
Transect shall not be considered grounds for the granting of a Waiver. This Waiver cannot
be combined with any other specified Waiver of the same standard.
b. Prior to submitting an application for an administrative Waiver, the prospective applicant
shall meet in a preapplication meeting with the Zoning Administrator to obtain information
and guidance as to matters related to the proposed application.
c. Required notice and hearing.
At the time of submitting the application to the Office of Zoning, the applicant shall notify
all Abutting property owners, including those across a street or alley, by certified mail. In the
case of Abutting condominiums, only one notice, by certified mail, to the condominium
association shall be sent.
Additionally, at the time of initial application, the applicant shall obtain from the Department
of Planning the list of all registered Neighborhood and homeowner associations within
the NET office that is applicable to applicant property and shall notify the NET office and
official representatives of such registered associations, by certified mail, of the application.
Neighborhood and homeowner associations who wish to receive such notice must register
on an annual basis at their local NET offices.
The applicant shall submit the certified receipt(s) from all notices to the Office of Zoning at
the time of submitting the application. The decision on a Waiver shall be posted on the City
website within five (5) days of the written decision.
d. Review criteria and approval process.
The Zoning Administrator shall review the Waiver application, as required under this Code,
in regard to compliance with the standards applicable to the specific Waiver and guiding
principles in Article 2 of the Miami 21 Code. Recommendations and findings from the
Planning Director shall be forwarded to the Zoning Administrator when applicable or when
requested by the Zoning Administrator. The review by the Planning Director shall apply
Article 4, Table 12 Design Review Criteria, as applicable. Based on these findings, and the
applicable findings and determinations of the Zoning Administrator, the Zoning
Administrator will issue a final decision on the Waiver request within ten (10) calendar days
of receiving the Planning Director' s recommendation and findings. The application shall
be approved, approved with conditions or denied. A citation to the legal authority shall be
included for any denial of a Waiver. In no event shall a Waiver be issued prior to thirty (30)
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report im
days from the time the notice of the application is provided to the NET office. The decision
of the Zoning Administrator shall include an explanation of the code requirements for an
appeal of the decision and shall be provided to the NET office which shall, within five (5)
days, distribute the Waiver to the official representatives of all registered neighborhood and
homeowner associations within the NET office that is applicable to the applicant property,
and the City shall post on the City' s website.
Approvals shall be granted when the application complies with all applicable regulations;
conditional approvals shall be issued when such applications require conditions in order to
be found in compliance with all applicable regulations; denials of applications shall be issued
if, after conditions and safeguards have been considered, the application still fails to comply
with all applicable regulations.
e. Appeal to the Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board.
Appeal of the determination of the Zoning Administrator shall be de novo and taken to the
Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board. An appeal shall be filed with the Hearing Boards Office
within fifteen (15) calendar days of the posting of decision on the City' s website.
f. A Waiver shall be valid for a period of two (2) years during which a building permit or
Certificate of Use must be obtained. This excludes a demolition or landscape permit. A one
time extension, for a period not to exceed an additional year, may be obtained upon
approval by the Zoning Administrator.
7.1.2.6 Exception
As identified in Article 4, Table 3 of this Code, a Use may be permitted by Exception in
specific Transect Zones if it conforms to criteria of this Miami 21 Code. Exceptions may also
be permitted as provided in this Code, such as for adjustments to nonconformities as
provided in Section 7.2. Except as otherwise provided in this Code, the Planning, Zoning and
Appeals Board shall determine whether an Exception may be granted.
a. Prior to submitting an application for an Exception under this Code, the prospective
applicant shall meet in a preapplication meeting with the Zoning Administrator and the
Planning Director to obtain information and guidance as to matters related to the proposed
application. The Planning Director may request the attendance of other city departments to
assist the applicant in submitting a complete preliminary application.
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report M
Appendices
b. Review by Planning Director and Coordinated Review Committee.
1. The Planning Director shall determine if a submitted preliminary application is complete
for purposes of further review.
2. If the Exception preliminary application meets or exceeds two hundred thousand
(200,000) square feet of floor area it shall be referred to the Coordinated Review Committee,
which shall review the preliminary application and provide its comments and
recommendations to the Planning Director.
3. Projects equal to or less than two hundred thousand (200,000) square feet of floor area
shall be reviewed by the Planning Director and the Zoning Administrator without need for
review by the Coordinated Review Committee, unless the Planning Director and Zoning
Administrator determine that review by the Coordinated Review Committee is necessary.
4. As appropriate to the nature of the Exception involved and the particular circumstances
of the case, the following criteria shall apply to an application for an Exception. The
application shall be reviewed for compliance with the regulations of this Code and a traffic
study shall be provided as required by the Planning Director. The review shall consider the
manner in which the proposed Use will operate given its specific location and proximity to
less intense Uses and shall apply Article 4, Table 12 Design Review Criteria, as applicable.
5. The Director shall prepare recommendations and certify the preliminary application and
accompanying recommendations to be filed with the Office of Hearing Boards for
consideration by the Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board. Upon filing with the Office of
Hearing Boards the application shall be placed on the agenda of the Planning, Zoning and
Appeals Board.
c. Decision by the Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board.
1. Notice and hearing.
A quasi-judicial hearing shall be held on the application for Exception.
The City shall notify all owners of property within five hundred (500) feet of the Property Line
of the land for which the hearing is required, by certified mail, of the time and place of the
hearing by the Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board at least ten days in advance of the
hearing. In the case of condominiums within the notification area, only one notice, by
certified mail, to the condominium association shall be sent. For the purpose of this
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report M
Appendices
requirement, the names and addresses of property owners shall be deemed those appearing
on the latest tax rolls of the City. The applicant shall provide the list of owners to the City at
the time of the initial application.
Additionally, the City shall notify all registered neighborhood and homeowner associations
within the NET office that is applicable to applicant property and shall notify the NET office
and official representatives of such registered associations, by certified mail, of the
application. Neighborhood and homeowner associations who wish to receive such notice
must register on an annual basis at their local NET offices.
The City shall certify at the time of the hearing that notice as herein required was given to
the persons as named and with the addresses shown on the certification. The applicant shall
pay for the costs of the mailings.
Posting of the property which is the subject of the hearing and newspaper notice shall be
required as provided in Chapter 62 of the City Code.
2. Review and findings.
The Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board shall give full consideration to the Planning
Director' s recommendations, and shall determine whether to grant an application for
Exception, to grant with conditions and safeguards or to deny the application. The Planning,
Zoning and Appeals Board shall issue written findings that the applicable requirements of
the Miami 21 Code have or have not been met. In no event shall an Exception be issued prior
to thirty (30) days from the time the notice of the application is provided to the NET office.
The decision of the Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board shall include an explanation of the
code requirements for an appeal of the decision and shall be provided to the NET office
which shall, within five (5) days, distribute the Exception to the official representatives of all
registered neighborhood and homeowner associations within the NET office that is
applicable to the applicant property, and the City shall post on the City' s website. The
Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board shall include a citation to the legal authority for any
denial of an Exception.
Approvals shall be granted when the application complies with all applicable regulations;
conditional approvals shall be issued when such applications require conditions in order to
be found in compliance with all applicable regulations; denials of applications shall be issued
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report W1
Appendices
if, after conditions and safeguards have been considered, the application still fails to comply
with all applicable regulations.
d. Appeal to the City Commission.
Appeal of the decision of the Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board shall be de novo applying
the Exception criteria in this Code and taken to the City Commission, pursuant to Section
7.1.5 of this Miami 21 Code. The appeal shall be filed with the Hearing Boards Office.
Notification of the appeal shall be provided by the City in the same manner as provided for
the original application in Section 7.1.2.6.c. of this Code.
The filing of the appeal shall state the specific reasons for such appeal, together with
payment of any required fee. The appeal may be filed only by the applicant or any person
who is aggrieved by the action of the Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board.
e. An Exception shall be valid for a period of two (2) years during which a building permit or
Certificate of Use must be obtained. This excludes a demolition or landscape permit. A one
(1) time extension, for a period not to exceed an additional year, may be obtained upon
approval by the Planning Director.
7.1.2.7 Variance
a. Variance defined; limitations.
A Variance is a relaxation of the terms of the Miami 21 Code, and is permitted only in those
exceptional circumstances when such action will not be contrary to the public interest and
where, owing to conditions peculiar to the property and not the result of actions of the
applicant, a literal enforcement of the Miami 21 Code would result in unnecessary and undue
hardship on the property. A Variance shall be authorized only for Lot size, Lot Coverage,
dimensions of side or rear Setbacks, parking and loading requirements, and Open Space
requirements. Variances shall be prohibited for anything not included in the listing above,
except as specifically provided by this Code. A Variance from the terms of the Miami 21 Code
shall not be granted unless and until every mitigating measure to offset the impact of the
relaxed requirement can be shown to have been taken.
Regulations of this Miami 21 Code that are not eligible for adjustment by Variance may be
eligible for administrative Waiver. See Section 7.1.2.5.
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report M
Appendices
Unachievable maximum Density, Height, or floor -plate, nonconforming Use of neighboring
lands, Structures or Buildings in the same Transect, and permitted Use of lands, Structures
or Buildings in any other Transect, shall not be considered grounds for the granting of a
Variance.
b. Criteria for approval.
An application for a Variance shall be approved only if it demonstrates all of the following:
1. Special conditions and circumstances exist that are peculiar to the land, Structure or
Building involved and that are not applicable to other lands, Structures, or Buildings in
the same Transect;
2. The special conditions and circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant;
3. Literal interpretation of the provisions of the Miami 21 Code deprives the applicant of
rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same Transect Zone and results in
unnecessary and undue hardship on the applicant;
4. Granting the Variance requested conveys the same treatment to the individual owner as
to the owner of other lands, Buildings or Structures in the same Transect Zone;
5. The Variance, if granted, is the minimum Variance that makes possible the reasonable
Use of the land, Building, or Structure; and
6. The grant of the Variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Miami
21 Code, and is not injurious to the Neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental to the
public.
7. The Variance if granted, is consistent with the applicable criteria as set forth in Article 4,
Table 12 as such relates to the particular location for which the Variance is being sought.
c. Prior to submitting an application for a Variance under this Code, the prospective
applicant shall meet with the Zoning Administrator and the Planning Director in a
preapplication meeting to obtain information and guidance as to matters related to the
proposed application.
d. Review by Planning Director.
The Planning Director shall determine if a submitted preliminary application for a Variance
is complete. Upon making a completeness determination, the Planning Director shall
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report M
prepare recommendations, and shall certify the preliminary application and accompanying
recommendations to be filed with the Hearing Boards Office for consideration by the
Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board.
e. Review by the Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board.
1. Notice.
A quasi-judicial hearing shall be conducted by the Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board
on the Variance application. Formal public notice of hearing by the Planning, Zoning and
Appeals Board of the application shall be issued.
The City shall notify all owners of property within 500 feet of the Property Line of the land
for which the hearing is required, by certified mail, of the time and place of the hearing
by the Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board at least ten days in advance of the hearing.
In the case of condominiums within the notification area, only one notice, by certified
mail, to the condominium association shall be sent. For the purpose of this requirement,
the names and addresses of property owners shall be deemed those appearing on the
latest tax rolls of the City. The applicant shall provide the list of owners to the City at the
time of the initial application.
Additionally, the City shall notify all registered neighborhood and homeowner
associations within the NET office that is applicable to applicant property and shall notify
the NET office and official representatives of such registered associations, by certified
mail, of the application. Neighborhood and homeowner associations who wish to
receive such notice must register on an annual basis at their local NET offices.
The City shall certify at the time of the hearing that notice as herein required was given
to the persons as named and with the addresses shown on the certification. The
applicant shall pay for the costs of the mailings.
Posting of the property which is the subject of the hearing and newspaper notice shall
be required as provided in Chapter 62 of the City Code.
2. Decision by the Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board. The Planning, Zoning and Appeals
Board shall consider the recommendations of the Planning Director, conduct a quasi-
judicial hearing, and shall issue written findings that the application meets or does not
meet the applicable criteria allowing for a Variance from the regulations of the Miami 21
Code. In no event shall a Variance be issued prior to thirty (30) days from the time the
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report M
Appendices
notice of the application is provided to the NET office. The decision of the Planning,
Zoning and Appeals Board shall include an explanation of the code requirements for an
appeal of the decision and shall be provided to the NET office which shall, within five (5)
days, distribute the Variance to the official representatives of all registered
neighborhood and homeowner associations within the NET office that is applicable to
the applicant property, and the City shall post on the City' s website. The Planning,
Zoning and Appeals Board shall include a citation to the legal authority for any denial of
a Variance.
3. Conditions and safeguards. In any Variance, the Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board
may prescribe appropriate mitigating conditions and safeguards in conformity with the
Miami 21 Code. Violation of such conditions and safeguards, when made a part of the
terms under which the Variance is granted, shall be deemed a violation of the Miami 21
Code and grounds for revocation of the Variance.
f. Appeal to the City Commission.
Appeal of the decision of the Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board shall be made to the City
Commission, as a de novo hearing, and as set forth in Section 7.1.5 of this Miami 21 Code.
The appeal shall be filed with the Hearing Boards Office. Notification of the appeal shall be
provided by the City in the same manner as provided for the original application in Section
7.1.2.7.e. of this Code.
The filing of the appeal shall state the specific reasons for such appeal, together with
payment of any required fee. The appeal may be filed only by the applicant or any person
who is aggrieved by the action of the Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board.
g. A project for which the Variance has been obtained shall be valid for a period of two (2)
years during which a Building Permit or Certificate of Use must be obtained. This excludes a
demolition or landscape permit. A one time extension, for a period not to exceed an
additional year, may be obtained upon approval by the Planning Director.
7.1.2.8 Amendment to Miami 21 Code
a. Successional Zoning. The City' s growth and evolution over time will inevitably require
changes to the boundaries of certain Transect Zones. These changes shall occur
successionally, in which the zoning change may be made only to a lesser Transect Zone;
within the same Transect Zone to a greater or lesser intensity; or to the next higher Transect
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report M
Appendices
Zone, or through a Special Area Plan. All changes shall maintain the goals of this Code to
preserve Neighborhoods and to provide transitions in Intensity, Density, Building Height
and Scale.
1. When a Cl zoned property ceases to be used for Civic functions, the successional rezoning
is determined by identifying the lowest Intensity Abutting Transect Zone, and rezoning to
that Zone' s next higher Intensity Zone.
2. For a property of nine (9) acres or more, a successional change shall require a Special Area
Plan as described in Article 3.
3. For all successional zoning changes of less than nine (9) acres, refer to the table below.
TRANSECT ZONE FLRSUCCESSIONAL ZONE FLR
T1 -- T1 --
T2 -- N/A --
T3
--
T4, Cl --
T4
--
T5, Cl --
T5
--
T6-8, Cl 6
T6-8
5
T6-12. Cl 8
T6-12
8
T6-24a, Cl 7
T6-24a
7
T6-24b, T6-36a, Cl 16
T6-24b
16
T6-36a, Cl 12
T6-36a
12
T6-60a, Cl 11
T6-48a
11
T6-60a, Cl
11
T6-60a
11
T6-60b, Cl
18
T6-60b, Cl
T6-48b
18
18
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report M
Appendices
T6-36b 22 T6-60b, Cl 18
T6-60b 18 N/A, Cl --
T6-80 24 N/A, Cl --
Cl -- Abutting Zones
CI -HD 8 T6-24 7
D1 -- T6-8*, T5, Cl, D2 5 (T6-8)* or -- all others
D2 -- D1, Cl --
D3 -- T6-8L, T6-8 O, Cl --
* The Planning Department shall make a recommendation as to which Transect Zone will
yield the most coherent pattern given the established zoning pattern and context in the
immediate vicinity.
b. The Miami 21 Code may be amended by amending the Miami 21 Atlas or by amending
the text of this Code.
1. Miami 21 Atlas amendments (also referred to as a "rezoning" , including Special Area
Plans) may only be applied for at two times of the year, which times shall be set yearly by the
City Commission. A rezoning to a CS Transect Zone, and any rezoning initiated by the City
shall be exempt from the twice yearly schedule. The Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board
shall make recommendations to the City Commission for such amendments to the Miami
21 Code.
2. Every two years, the City may conduct a comprehensive review of the Miami 21 Atlas to
evaluate the development direction of the City' s neighborhoods and determine if
additional amendments are appropriate.
3. Amendments to the text of the Miami 21 Code (including tables and diagrams) may be
made only upon application of a city official and may be considered at any time during the
year.
c. Applications for rezoning (Miami 21 Atlas amendment).
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report M
Appendices
1. Except where the proposal for the rezoning of property involves an extension of an
existing Transect boundary, no rezoning of land shall be considered which involves less than
forty thousand (40,000) square feet of land area or two hundred (200) feet of street Frontage
on one (1) street. A rezoning to a "CS," Civic Space Transect Zone, or 71," Natural
Transect Zone, initiated by the City shall be exempt from the minimum size and Frontage
requirements as stated herein. Any properties less than twenty thousand (20,000) square
feet or two hundred (200) feet of street frontage which are rezoned to "CS," Civic Space
Transect Zone, shall not be utilized towards the City' s no net loss policy for public park
land. Applications for rezoning may be made by:
(a) The City Commission;
(b) The Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board;
(c) Any other department, board or agency of the City;
(d) Any person or entity other than those listed in (a) through (c), above, provided that only
the owner(s) or their agent(s) may apply for the rezoning of property.
(e) Persons and entities listed in (a) through (c) shall not join applications with persons or
entities listed in (d).
2. Applications for rezoning made pursuant to (d) above shall be made on an application
form as provided by the City which shall require, at a minimum, the following information:
(a) Location of the property, including address and legal description
(b) Survey of the property prepared by a State of Florida registered land surveyor within six
(6) months from the date of the application, including acreage.
(c) Affidavit and disclosure of ownership of all owners and contract purchasers of the
property, including recorded warranty deed and tax forms of the most current year. For
corporations and partnerships, include articles of incorporation, certificate of good
standing, and authority of the person signing the application. Non-profit organizations shall
list members of the Board of Directors for the past year.
(d) Certified list of owners of real estate within five hundred (500) feet of the subject property.
(e) Present zoning of the property and Future Land Use designation of the property.
(f) At least two photographs that show the entire property.
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report W
(g) An analysis of the properties within a one-half mile radius of the subject property
regarding the existing condition of the radius properties and the current zoning and Future
Land Use designations of the radius properties. The analysis shall include photos of Building
elevations of both sides of the street extending three hundred (300) feet beyond all
boundaries of the site. An aerial photo of the site and the radius properties shall be included.
The analysis shall explain why the zoning change is appropriate and why the existing zoning
is inappropriate, in light of the intent of the Miami 21 Code and particularly in relation to
effects on adjoining properties.
d. Review of application for code amendments by Planning Director.
1. The Planning Director shall review each application for a code amendment and provide a
recommendation and a statement in regard to how each of the criteria of this Code is met
or not met. In the case of rezonings, the Director shall additionally review the application in
regard to whether the land Use densities and intensities are compatible with and further the
objectives, policies and land Uses in the Comprehensive Plan, and whether the criteria
in 7.1.2.8.f are met.
2. A non -City applicant for rezoning shall obtain a Zoning Referral by the Zoning
Administrator, and meet with the Planning Director and Zoning Administrator in a
preapplication meeting prior to the applicant' s submission of a preliminary application for
rezoning. The Director shall review each preliminary application for rezoning for
completeness. The Planning Director shall certify the preliminary application and his
accompanying recommendations to be filed with the Office of Hearing Boards for
consideration by the Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board. The applicant shall be responsible
for filing the application with the Office of Hearing Boards. Upon filing with the Office of
Hearing Boards, the application shall be placed on the agenda of the Planning, Zoning and
Appeals Board.
e. Review by the Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board.
1. Notice
Formal public notice of hearing by the Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board of an application
for a code amendment shall be issued in the following manner:
The City shall notify all owners of property within 500 feet of the Property Line of the land
for which the hearing is required, by certified mail, of the time and place of the rezoning
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report W
Appendices
hearing by the Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board at least ten days in advance of the
hearing. In the case of condominiums within the notification area, only one notice, by
certified mail, to the condominium association shall be sent. For the purpose of this
requirement, the names and addresses of property owners shall be deemed those appearing
on the latest tax rolls of the City. The applicant shall provide the list of owners to the City at
the time of the initial application.
Additionally, the City shall notify all registered neighborhood and homeowner associations
within the NET office that is applicable to applicant property and shall notify the NET office
and the official representatives of such registered associations, by certified mail, of the
rezoning application. Neighborhood and homeowner associations who wish to receive such
notice must register on an annual basis at their local NET offices.
Notice of text amendments shall be as provided by Chapter 62 of the City Code and state
law.
The City shall certify at the time of the hearing that notice as herein required was given to
the persons as named and with the addresses shown on the certification. The applicant shall
pay for the costs of the mailings.
Posting of the property which is the subject of the hearing and newspaper notice shall be
required as provided in Chapter 62 of the City Code.
2. Review, findings and recommendation.
(a) The Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board shall give full consideration to the Director' s
recommendations, and shall evaluate whether an application for a code amendment should
be granted, granted with modifications or denied.
(b) The Board shall conduct a hearing on text amendments and make its recommendations
based on whether the criteria in this section are met.
(c) The Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board shall conduct a quasi-judicial public hearing on
rezoning applications, and make its recommendations based on whether the criteria in this
section are met.
f. Criteria.
The recommendations of the Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board shall show that the board
has considered and studied the application in regard to the following criteria:
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report W
Appendices
1. For all amendments:
(a) The relationship of the proposed amendment to the goals, objectives and policies of
the Comprehensive Plan, with appropriate consideration as to whether the proposed
change will further the goals, objectives and policies of the Comprehensive Plan; the Miami
21 Code; and other city regulations.
(b) The need and justification for the proposed change, including changed or changing
conditions that make the passage of the proposed change necessary.
2. For rezonings:
A change may be made only to the next intensity Transect Zone or by a Special Area Plan,
and in a manner which maintains the goals of this Miami 21 Code to preserve
Neighborhoods and to provide transitions in intensity and Building Height.
3. For Special Area Plan rezonings:
Special Area Plans shall be adopted by rezoning pursuant to the provisions of Section 3.9.
g. City Commission action on Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board recommendations.
1. Notice and hearings.
Upon receipt of the findings and recommendations regarding code amendments by the
Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board, the City Commission shall hold at least two advertised
public hearings on the proposed code amendments. Notice shall be given as follows:
The City shall notify all owners of property within five hundred (500) feet of the Property Line
of the land for which the hearing is required, by certified mail, of the time and place of the
rezoning hearing by the City Commission at least ten days in advance of the hearing. In the
case of condominiums within the notification area, only one notice, by certified mail, to the
condominium association shall be sent. For the purpose of this requirement, the names and
addresses of property owners shall be deemed those appearing on the latest tax rolls of the
City. The applicant shall provide the list of owners to the City at the time of the initial
application.
Additionally, the City shall notify all registered neighborhood and homeowner associations
within the NET office that is applicable to applicant property and shall notify the NET office
and the official representatives of such registered associations, by certified mail, of the
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report W
Appendices
rezoning application. Neighborhood and homeowner associations who wish to receive such
notice must register on an annual basis at their local NET offices.
Notice of text amendments shall be as provided by Chapter 62 of the City Code and state
law.
The City shall certify at the time of the hearing that notice as herein required was given to
the persons as named and with the addresses shown on the certification. The applicant shall
pay for the costs of the mailings.
Posting of the property which is the subject of the hearing and newspaper notice shall be
required as provided in Chapter 62 of the City Code and by state statute.
2. Adoption.
In the case of all proposed Miami 21 text or Miami 21 Atlas amendments, if the
recommendation of the Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board is adverse to the proposal,
such rezoning shall not be adopted except by the vote of at least three members of the City
Commission.
The City Commission may, by a vote of not less than three (3) members, approve the
rezoning of property to a Transect Zone of less Intensity than that applied for in situations
where, in the opinion of the Commission and upon the recommendation of the Planning
Director, the specific rezoning applied for would work to the detriment of the health, safety
or welfare of the surrounding Neighborhood, whereas a rezoning to a Transect Zone of less
Intensity would not.
In no event shall a rezoning be issued prior to thirty (30) days from the time the notice of the
application is provided to the NET office. The decision of the City Commission shall include
an explanation of the code requirements for an appeal of the decision and shall be provided
to the NET office and posted on the City' s website. The City Commission shall include a
citation to the legal authority for any denial of a rezoning.
3. Failure of City Commission to act.
If a recommendation of the Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board is not legislatively decided
within twelve (12) months from first reading by the City Commission, the application upon
which the report and recommendation are based shall be deemed to have been denied.
However, for amendment to the Comprehensive Plan and its corresponding Miami 21 Atlas
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report W
Appendices
amendment, the time period will be extended an additional twelve (12) months. In both
instances, the provisions of sections 62-54 and 62-55 of the City Code will not apply unless
otherwise required by the City Commission. No day of the month of August shall be counted
in the administration of this section.
4. Limitation on further consideration after denial.
Whenever the City Commission has denied an application for the rezoning of property, the
Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board shall not thereafter:
(a) Consider any further application for the same rezoning of any part or all of the same
property for a period of eighteen months from the date of such action;
(b) Consider an application for any other kind of rezoning on any part or all of the same
property for a period of twelve months from the date of such action; or
(c) Consider an application for rezoning that involves the same owner' s property within
two hundred (200) feet of property granted a change within a period of twelve (12) months.
5. Limitation on further consideration after rezoning.
Whenever the City Commission has rezoned property, the Planning, Zoning and Appeals
Board shall not thereafter consider any petition for rezoning of all or any part of the same
property for a period of eighteen (18) months from the date of such action.
6. Limitation on further consideration after voluntary withdrawal of application.
Whenever an applicant has voluntarily withdrawn an application for rezoning of property
during either first or second reading before the City Commission, the Planning, Zoning and
Appeals Board shall not thereafter consider an application for the same property for
eighteen (18) months from the date of such action, nor consider an application for any kind
of rezoning of any part or all of the same property for twelve (12) months from the date of
such action.
7. Waiver of time limits.
The time limits set forth in this subsection g. may be waived by a vote of at least three (3)
members of the City Commission when such action is deemed necessary to prevent injustice
or to facilitate development of the city in the context of the adopted Comprehensive Plan,
or any portion thereof.
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report
Page Left Intentionally Blank
Appendices
APPENDIX C:
MAP OF CITY -OWNED PROPERTIES
CKy� f�M i a m i
City -Owned Properties
LTT7LE RI ER I i
NH NEH/Ty
NW 53RD �y
82ND � Q
1 NW AeSi "'T Ni-
e
N z _
NvV 53N9 i - C• N
i w •LNrm SaTH ST z �� o s ••
' t.`.F FSESTN a •� •�i • •
D'FF W4eT STK • • • NETH ST
a
U2 RAMP : F 36TH ST
art sa-Fq •NW-,eTl'let rdEza?n
\ qJ Op a.• £ • • 26TF. Sf
v
W 2151 S a° `� E • : + •�• NW5T •
�A 4 OW
_jNW 1N7ii15T�ke�•E•VFMEfIAN 5
I _ 1W 17�TM ST' • ` 2• u NCI. Y;TTHCSWY yENEITAN NY £
WAY NI
_ ` F • r" p awv 2TH s q • •
5 • z • Y •� YI F1 AfLEN ST , SW 15T SC' -5T $7
?' • S: p U
xsW sA HTER sr I 0,rm FH Sl•
.�
r wi NQ
- 'h • SW L61H cI �SYS Ii STc • •VK • �T�N
• 7M Sar
CORAMILE
•%k E •
WAY ry >>I. ST • •
WAY M?LC N •SN'TVY�
+Y • l`� �µQ P.ICK'e NBAC%ER
ANAS AV[ TLk z,}W 27TH p 5� D
• � ST S �d •
• #
71 -. �—,I ollNDa v• tt t� •
- 'l'EGii' • •
id
IF I r ; (D r/
r
1-_le YCGE4NATER DR , 1
SWS c
p`j Rp N w_
• City -Owned Property
0 0.5 1 2 Miles
reared by the City of Miami PI nning De !jment
:�Plarining}GQGeo PLANNIN Q.r a es
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report W
Appendices
APPENDIX D.
INFORMATION RELATING TO WARRANTS
Approved Warrants from 2019 — 2021(169 Total)
Warrant Nom6er Project Name Address
PZ-18-282-WT Mergoesc8erry 301 NW 17 Street
n a Ona
S1r—To—
Use Comm.
MULTIFAMILY 5
RESIDENCE
NET—
—FLOWN
A 18284 WT Vth TO RE V Street
PZ-IB-292-WT Testa Wines SoI.R.s: M24 NE M,—
Inc. Place
PZ-18-295-WT The Gallery on th e 401 NW NORTH
fiver RIVER DR
AUP298-WT THE LH642 642SW end Sneer
GENERAL zELI
OCMMEROAL,MULTIFA
MILY RESIDENCE, OFFICE
OPEN AI A RETAIL 2
MULTIFAMILY 5
RESIDENCE
MULTIFAMILY 3
(TEMPO ANT OMNI CAA
BUILDING)
DOWNTOWN-BRISHELL
(TEMPO I OFF,
BUILD NG)
Ov10—
oTTlE—NA
PZ-18342-WT Mlaml World-- 1001 NE 1st Ave
RESI GEN.
GENERAL 2
DOWNTOWN-BRIO(ELL
clock A.
CA4MULTIFA
(TEM IOW
PZ-16—WT Seventh street Parking 2322 NW 7ST
MILYRE SBUILDO
PUBUOPARKING 3
LITTLE —NA
A18362-WT ub.1ySq. re 6514NW 13Av
Ph—w0,LLC
PZ18389-WT Wot—OBA.—nt 1600RE1AV
A 1839I-WT DOLPHIN UHAUL 1771 SW 8STREET
MU1IFAMLY 5
RESIDENCE
OPEN AR RETAIL 2
3
MODELOry
DOWNTOWN BRICKELL
(TEMPORARY AT OMNI CAA
BUILD G)
LITTLE HAVANA
PZ-18483-WT ORIENTAL CHINESE 1642 SW 8ST
RESTYSURANT INC
PZ-18493-WT Marconi l nternatl onal 141 NE 3 AV 700
CGAILTORLATEDAB,
ALOCHOL BEVERAGE 3
SERVICE ESTAB
OCILEGE/UNIVERSITY 2
DTTIE NIAVARA
ROSS--B k,II
Unly ersity US
ITem SO rery. OMNI VA
E'Ildl ng)
PZ-18S35-WT ASandwlchene 169 NW 23 ST
FOOD SERVI HE 5
WY-OOD EDGEWATER
W yn wood
A 18565-WT V.-5ar Brewery 55NW 25 ST
PZ-18572-WT NACA4NO 169 NEW 23 169 NW 23 ST
sEATwswnpRANTR
PZ-19-1102-WT CASA MIA 126 NW 10.AV
ESTABUSHMENT
ALVESEGE 5
SERVICE FSTAB.
FOOD SERVICE 5
USHMENT
MULTIFAMILY 3
WYNWOOD EDGEWATER
WYSSOOD EDGEWATER
LITTLE HAVANA
PZ191920WT Le CESD7amTus 310NW24ST
PZ-19-112J-wT 268 S. W. 8 STREET- 268SW 8ST
o G
wARRANT
PZ-19-1928-WT ERra space storage 201 NW 37 AV
RESIDENCE
FOODS ,l 5
ESTABLISHMENT
OUTSIDE DININGAREA 3
STORAGE/DISTRIBULION 4
FACILITY
WYNWOOD EDGEWATER
DOWNTOWN-BRIO(ELL
(TEM IOW
B41LDG)MR
.I
FIAGAMI
RE 191951 WT 1901I.d.r 59-Fla1er
3
RES DENGE
DTTIE HAVANA
PZ-19-1169-wT fQUINix 50RE9ST
INFRASTRUCTURE AND 2
UTILITIES
DOWNTOWN-BRIO(ELL
(TEMPORARY AT OMNI CRA
G)
PZ 1919I4 WT 3321 MARV STREET- 3321 MARV Sr
OUTDOOR SEATI NG
WARRANT
PZ-19-20D WT Aroma GFe 1600 HE 1AV
PZ-19-2194-WT PHOS STREET TAOCS 2 158 NW 245E
LLC
FOODSERV� 2
ESTABLISHMENT
OUTSIDE DINI NO AREA 2
ALOOTOL BEVERAGE 5
SERVICE FSTAB.
COOJNUT GROVE
DOWNTOWN-BRIIXELL
(TEM IOW
BUILDO)
WYNWOOD EDGEWATER
PZ 192310W ew Affordable 320 SW 13 AV
T Havana inks
PZ-19-2313-WT EdB-Plece3 610 NW 60 ST
PZ 192428 WT Starbacks Mld[nwn 3401 HE SAV
3
REST DENGE
MULTIFAMILY 5
RESIDENCE
DDD32RV
FlE 2
ESTABUSHM ENT
DT —NATA_C
MODELCIN
WYNWOOD EDGEWATER
PZ-19-2432-WT MWC D.— 1016NE2AVE
PZ-19-248O-WT 3MI—C2nt al 161 NW 63T
SPedal Sig Padage
MULTIFAMILY 2
RESIDENCE
OFFICE 5
DOWNTOWN-BRIO(ELL
(TEMPO OMNI OFF,
BUILDI N6/
OVERTOWN
MO dIA A
PZ 192511 WT MIX FLORI DA LLC
oRmMMEROAL3
OUTSIDE DINING AREA 2
PORARVM AT OMN aW
PZ-19-2545-WT Block 55-Sawyers 249 NW 6ST
GENERAL COMM EROAL 5
OU DII
OVERTOWN
L3ndmg
23
PZ 192551 WT Workforce 5423 NE MIAMI CT
MULTIF AMILY 5
LITTLE HAITI
HOLEng MF
Nge1 of6
RESIDENCE
TrancecZonet -. d First
Notice
Date of Final Decision
Renotice cannot beI sued
Final
is
Porting DA.
Application Status
T4 OB/29/2019
poor m:
09/28/2011
(os a ce)
11/01/219
11/05/2019
Flnel D-Bon
GOm Plae/Readv far
oc
T6 08/13/2019
09/12/2019
OB/142020
68/14/2020
Pr,b Heanng
"'1D"'0'
Co., e/Ready For
_
Publlc Hearing
T6 OS/]5/2019
06/M/2019
BB/262819
FB/262019
Hnal Oedson
GO -FE /R.A yfor
Pub IIc Hearl ng
T6 01/21/2020
02/20/2020
04/16/2020
04/16/2020
FI"I DerJlon
Com PIEL eady for
oc
T4 05/112020
06/10/2020
06/19/2020
06/19/2020
Pr,b Heanng
malDedson
Com plete/Ready For
g
Pab lmD-P
T6 o6/ln/2019
m/zo/zo 19
06/12/2020
06/122ozo
Hnal Ded,I4n
E
ae/Readyfor
IIc
j2E2019 T6 SO
11/24/2039
12/26/20.
12/26/2019
Pub Hearl ng
D-I Ded Aon
Corn pl d e/Ready for
Pub IIc Hearl ng
T4 07/092019
OOO/2019
02/032020
02/032020
—ID.--
ompla Readyfor
Pab lln Hearm,
T6 05/06/2019
06/05/2019
07/03/2019
07/03/2019
FinalQE--
GOm pl ae/Ready for
Ilc
10/152019
11/14/2019
07/082021
0/082021
Pub Heanng
Final Denson
Com SIFT /R-dyfor
Pub IIc Heering
T6 03/122019
04/11/2019
04/26/2019
04/26/2019
Final Deoson
GO 'lae/Readyfor
Ilc
T6 10/24/2019
11/23/2019
12/31/2011
12/31/2019
Pub Hearing
Final Ded Aon
COI, Pl d e/Reedy for
Pub IIc Hearing
T5 06/112020
07/19/2020
08/142020
08/142020
Inal Dens on
Co. R—Readyfor
Pobllc H-r
T5 08/22/2019
O9/21/2019
09/30/2019
09/30/2019
Final D-Bon
Com pl FE /Read, for
IIc
T5 04/012019
05/01i2019
05/142019
05/142019
Pub Hearl ng
ma1ed Dson
Co. ple[AW-dy For
Pub IIc Hearin¢
T5 OOGE2o19
05/26/2019
06/19/2019
06/19/2019
Final D.--
GO -IaerReadvfor
_
Publlc Heanng
T4 07/22/2019
08/21/2019
05/29/2020
05/29/2020
FI"I DerJAOn
CEOPlae/Ready for
Pobllc rn
T5 04/W2019
05/12/2019
05/172019
ma1DeeAOn
GOm plete/Ready for
Pub IIc Hearing
T6 04/25/2019
05/25/2019
09/20/2019
09/20/2019
FinalD-PE,
GO 'IaerReadyfor
Pr,b oc Heanng
T6 01/012011
05/31/2019
06/11/20.
06/19/2019
D-I Ded Aon
COI,Pl d e/Ready for
Pub IIc Hearl ng
08/302019
09/292019
11/082019
11/082019
ma l oed—
Om plae/R.Ady for
Pab IIr Lear —
HE 01/14/2020
02/13/2020
03/26/2020
04/10/2020
F—ID-Bon
GOm pia WReady for
IIc
T5,T6 04/132019
05/13/2019
05/202019
Pub Hearl ng
Final Denson
Com PI" /R-dy for
Pub IIc Heering
T6 07/03/2019
08/02/2019
10/16/2019
10/16/2019
Final Deoson
GO 'lae/Readyfor
Ilc
T5 01/2H/2020
02/27/2020
03/02/2020
03/02/2020
Pub Hearing
FinalD-Aon
COP
Plae/Ready for
Pub IIc Hearin
T4 12/312019
OCOOF020
03/262020
04/102020
Inal Denson
GOplae/R.Ady for
_
Pobllc Hearine
T5 01/07/2020
02/35/2020
02/21/2020
02/21/2020
F—D-Bon
ComPlFE /Read,for
oc
T6 04/172019
05/17/2019
07/02/2019
07/022019
Pr,b Hearing
ma1Dedson
Co. ple[AW-dy For
Pub IIc Hearine
o9jDEC-9
10/06/2019
10/10/2019
10/10/2019
Sm. D.--
GO -IaerReadvfor
Publlc Hearinz
T6 04/30/2020
05/30/2020
06/15/2020
06/15/2020
FI"I DerJAOn
CEOPlae/Ready for
Public
T6 01/112019
10/11/2019
11/012019
11/012019
Inal Dee s0 g
GOpia e/Ready for
Pobllc Hearine
T6 02/11/2020
03/20/2020
03/27/2020
04/10/2020
FInalD-PE,
GO 'ae/Readyfor
oc
T4 06/122020
07/12/2020
08/122020
08/122020
Pr,b Heanng
Inal Denson
Com pia e/Ready For
Publlc Hearing
_
9/9/2621 12.05.12
PM
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report W
Appendices
Warrant N—b-
Prej¢s-SName
A.dkreis
Use
Comm.
NET.Nea
Transact
Gate of Firs[
D—of Final D-i-In
Final
Posting D..
Application Status
District
Zen¢
NMk.
R¢n¢tic¢ ea et E. isxu¢d
n priorto:
U¢rm—
(Issuance)
PZ-19-2564-WT
1396NW 365T
MULTIFAMILY
1
ALLAPATTAH
T6
11/26/2019
12/26/2019
04/28/2020
04/28/2020
Flnel O'Gslon
RESIDENCE
Com plat ,/Read Y for
Public Hearing
ESE -19-2660-WT
PF&11a Wynwood
274 NW 27 ST
FOOD SERVI CE
5
WYNWOOD-EDGEWATER
TS
11/I6/2019
09/15/2019
10/10 19
A/10/2019
Final Dedslon
ESTABIJSHMENT
Com pIN ,/Read y for
Public Hearing
PZ-19-2669 WT
Block 45
152 NW 8ST
GENERAL
5
OVERTOWN
T6
09/23/2019
10/23/2019
01/23/2020
01/23/2020
Final Dedslon
COMMERCIAL,MULTIFA
Com ,F/R'ady for
MILY RESIDENCE
Public Earl ng
PZ-19-2721-WT
WHIFF IF
2328 N MIAMI AV
FOOD SERVICE
5
WYNWOOD EDGEWATER
T6
09/05/2019
10/05/2019
10/222019
10/222019
Final Dedslon
ESTABLISHMENT
Com pl,t,/R,ad y for
Public Heari ng
ESE -19-2742-WT
Ado Hot,l
2217 NW MIAMI
HOTELEUTSIDE DINING
5
WYNWOOD EDGEWATER
T6
11/25/2019
12/25/2019
01/06/2020
01/06/2020
Final D--I,
CT
AREA
Complet'/R'ady for
Public. Hear in¢
PZ-19-2792-WT
3MIaml Cal -I
161 NO 6ST
GENERAL COMM SEGAL
5
OVERTOWN
T6
07/01/2019
07/31/2019
08/02/2019
08/02/2019
Fl nal Dedslon
SP, cal Si DI Pa Lkag,
Com p1et,/R,ad y for
Modlflctlon
Pub ll c H.,ng
PZ-19-286J-WT
Allapattah T,LkFD
728 NW 29 ST
OPEN AIR RETAIL
1
AUAPATTAH
Dl
12/07/2019
01/06/2020
05/15/2020
05/15/2020
Final Dedslon
Com Piet ,/Read y for
Public Hearine
PZ-19-2932-WT
1010 BRIOCELLAVE-
1010 BRIOCELLAV
OUTSIDE DININGAREA
2
DOWNTOWN-BRIIXELL
T6
08/22/2019
09/21/2019
10/11/2019
10/11/2019
Final Dedslon
OUTDOOR SEATING
(TEMPORARYAT OMNI CRA
Complet,/Ready for
WARRANT
BUILDING)
PubII C E'arl ng
PZ-19-2964-WT
n e Dy of mleml
"I
1400 NW 12 AV
MAIOR FAULTY
1
Allapattah
CI-ED
081
09/05/2020
12222020
12/222020
E FIOecl—
/Jackson -
Com pl,t,/R,ad y for
mo e
Pub he Hearing
PZ-19-2980 WT
139 NE 3 AVEag
131 RE3 AV
ALCOHOL BEVERAGE
2
DOWNTOWN-BRIIXELL
T6
OB/29/2019
09/28/2019
12/18/2019
12/18/2019
Final OF --
ALCOHOL WARRANT
SERVICE ESTAB.
(TEMPORARYAT OMNI CRA
Co m plete/R'ady for
BUILDING)
Public Hearin¢
PZ-19-2984-WT
Co nt,mporary Arts
1100 NW 23 S1
OUTSIDE DINING AREA
1
ALLAPATTAH
D1
11/19/2019
12/19/2019
12/19/2019
12/19/2019
Final OF--
Foundation Inc
Com plat ,/Ready for
Public Hearing
PZ-193053-WT
SIXTH STREET MIAMI
601 HE 1 AV
MULTIFAMILY
2
DOWNTOWN-BRICKELL
T6
10/15/2019
11/14/2019
10/20/2020
10/20/2020
Final OF--
RESIDENGE
(TEMPORARYAT OMNI OTA,
Com ple,/R,ady for
BUILDING)
Public Hearing
PZ-19-3071-WT
el tFq-
1380 SW 8ST
OPEN AIR RETAIL
3
I1NI, Havana
T6
10/22/2019
11/21/2019
02/06/2020
02/06/2020
Final OF--
Com plot,/Ready for
_
Public Hearin¢
PZ-193084-WT
BD19004098001
1500 SW IAV
HOTEL
3
Downtown-Brlckell
T6
09/20/2019
10/20/2019
10/28/2019
10/28/2019
Final Dedslon
(T,m porary at OMNI CRA
Com pl,t,/R,ad y for
BUll di nl_
Public Hearing
ESE -19-311J-WT
LOVE@LOTUSHOUSE
217 NW 155T
MULTIFAMILY
5
OVERTOWN
CI
01/30/2020
02/29/2020
03/11/2020
04/10/2020
Final OFd —
01.
RESIDENCE
Com pIN,/Read y for
Public Hearing
PZ-193138 WT
LITTLE HAVANA
700 SW BST
ADULT DAYCARE
3
UTTLE HAVANA
T5
06/07/2019
07/07/2019
07/122019
07/122019
Fl na OF--
ACTIVITIES &
Com plet'/R'ad y for
RULE TI ON CENTERS
Pub II c Heari nR
PZ-193174-WT
Del Boca Brlckell LP
900SMIAMIAV
ALCOHOL BEVERAGE
2
DOWNTOWN-BRICKELL
T6
10/09/2019
11/08/2019
12/04/2019
12/04/2019
Final Dedslon
161
SERVICE ESTAB.
(TEMPORARYAT OMNI OFA
('ompl,t,/R,adyfor
BUILDING)
Public Hearing
PZ-193212-WT
Island Gad'ns
888MACARTHUR
GENERAL COMM EROAL
2
Downtown-Brlckell
T6
05/11/2019
07/11/2019
09/06/2019
09/06/2019
Final OF--
CSWY
(Tam Porery at OMNI CRA
Com plat ,/Read y for
B,,Idlpg)
r.
Public Hearine
PZ-19-330]-WT
Opal Garden
5185 WFLEGLER
MULTIFAMILY
4
Flagaml
T5
03/26/2021
04/25/2021
05/10/2021
05/10/2021
Final OF--
ST
RESIDENCE
Co m pl.'/R-d, for
Public Hearinz
PZ-193392-WT
ERE Do Ip hi n
3305 SW IAV
INFRASTRUCTURE AND
3
Lille Havana
T3
08/07/2020
09/06/2020
03/18/2021
03/18/2021
Final Dedslon
Subs AT on
UTILITIES
Com p1,t,/R,ad y for
Public Hearin,
PZ-193408-WT
616 SW 7AVE
616 SW 7 AVE
MULTIFAMILY
3
Little Havana
T4
12/28/2020
01/27/2021
06/15/2021
O6/15/2021
Final OF--
RESIDENCE
Com plet'/R'ad y for
Public Hearine
PZ-19-3436-WT
Hotel arya sl B-g,
2889 MC DARLENE
HOTEL
2
Coconut Gmv,
T5
12/01/2020
12/31/2020
02/05/2021
02/05/2021
Final OF--
relmagln2frepacemen
RD
Com plet'/R'ady for
Pub llc Heari ng
PZ-193438-WT
NEW MULTIFAMILY
1021 NW 1ST
MULTIFAMILY
3
Little Eavane
T4
02/27/2021
03/29/2021
05/06/2021
05/06/2021
Final OF --
BUILDING
RESI DENGE
Com ple,/R,ad y for
Public Hearine
PZ-193498 WT
Resdennal
2323 NW 36 ST
MULTIFAMILY
1
Allapattah
T6
63/24/2020
04/23/2020
09/16/2020
09/16/2020
Final Dedslon
Apart meats
RESIDENCE
Com plat E/REad y far
_
Public Hearing
PZ-19-3502-WT
801 BRIO:ELL BAY DR-.801
BRIO:ELL BAY
FOOD SERVICE
2
Downtown-Brlckell
T6
09/30/2019
10/30/2019
12/122019
12/122019
Final OF--
ALCOHOL WARRANT
DR
ESTABLISHMENT
(Tam I,—, at OMNI MA
Com Piet,/Ready for
Bull ding?
_
Pub IIC EFF—D
PZ-193514-WT
AC By Mernot 3400
3400 BISCAYNE
GENERAL COMM EROAL
2
Wynwood/Edgewater
T6
08/11/2019
09/10/2019
12/13/2019
12/13/2019
Final OF--
BiscayneBI,d
BLVD
Com plat,/Read y for
Public Hearine
PZ-19-3529-WT
MEGA ENTER
420 SW EST
OFFICE
3
THI, Havana
T6
06/05/2020
07/05/2020
07/23/2020
07/23/2020
Final OF --
STORAGE
Com plat,/Read, for
_
Public Hearine
PZ-193557 WT
3197 COMMODORE
3197
FOOD SERVICE
2
CF—,,Grove
T5
10/03/2019
11/02/2019
12/S8/20A
12/18/2019
Final Dedslon
PLAZA -ALCOHOL
COM MODORE PLZ
ESTABUSHMENT
Complet'/R'adyfor
WARRANT
Public Heari"
PZ-193562-WT
Ml aml Chi l d Lens
980 MACARTHUR
COMMUNITY FAUUTY
2
Downtown-Brlckell
Cl
12/17/2019
O1/16/2020
04/022020
04/10/2020
FinalOFF—
Vuseum
CSWY
(Tam p.,Py at OMNI CRA
Complete/Readyfor
_
B, IBI. ,°Pl-
_
_
Pub 11 c H,,aring
PZ-19-3650-WT
El Car Wash Expansion
66 NW 27 AV
AUTO RELATED
4
Flagaml
T6
05/26/2020
06/25/2020
07/02/2020
07/02/2020
Final OF--
COMMERCIAL ESTAB.
Com I.,/Read y for
Pb I, HEaring
PZ-1936JJ-WT
311 NW SKIVER DR
311 NW SOUTH
FOOD SERVICE
3
Llttle Havana
CO
07/14/2020
02/13/2020
03/11/2020
04/10/2020
Fl nal DE,—,
Project
RIVER DR
ESTABLISHMENT
Com pl,t,/R,ady for
_
Public Hearine
PZ-193687 WT
169 NW 23 ST
169 NW 23 ST
FOOD SERVI CE
5
Wynwood/Edgewater
T5
10/29/2019
11/28/2019
03/24/2020
04/10/2020
Final OF --
ALCOHOL WARRANT
ESTABUSHMENT
Co mpI./Ready for
P,ubllc Heari D
PZ-193740-WT
Wd'n IC
162 NE 39 ST
ALCOHOL BEVERAGE
5
Wynwood/Edgewater
T6
l0/11/2019
11/10/2019
12/09/2019
12/09/2019
Final OF--
SERVICE ESTAB.
y
Com plot,/R2Fd, for
IPubIICHEaring
Page 2 of 6
9/9/2021 12:05.12
PM
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report W
Appendices
Warrant N—ber
Protect Name.
Add—
Uve
Comm.
NETt-
Dictnct
PZ-193803-WT
Freehold Mlaml
2229 NW 2AV
OPEN AIR RETAIL
5
Wynwood/Edgewater
PZ-19382-WT
V,-k Park New
3255 PLAZA ST
RECFATI ONAL FAO LILY
2
Caconut Grove
Aquatic Fadllty
PZ-193872-WT
Art House Sod,ty lnc.
3400 SW 3AV
SPECAL
3
Uttle Havana
TRAININGNOCATIONAL
PZ-1938C8-WT
bulek building
3841 NE 2AV 101
AUTORELATED5
Wynwood/Edgewater
OCMMEROALESTAB,
PZ-193879-WT
BONSAI
519 SW 5AV
MULTIFAMILY
3
Lttle Havana
RESIDENCE
PZ-194056-WT
blu27@EDGEWATER
201 BISCAYNE
MULTIFAMILY
2
Wynwood/Edgewater
BLVD
RESIDENCE
P2 19 4058 WT
Mayaml
130 NW 24 ST
OPEN AIR RETAIL
5
Wynwood/Edgewater
PZ-194059-WT
Ubelty Square Phase
1201 NW 65 ST
MULTIFAMILY
5
Model 11,
III Parking
RESIDENCE
PZ-114201-WT
Residence N, Erickell
1741 SW 2AV
HOTEL
3
Downtown Erlekell
Warrant
(T—p—Py at OMNI CRA
td—1
PZ-114216-WT
Wework III —noted
SET NW 26 SF
GENERAL COMM EROAL
5
Wy/Edgewater
wall , s
PZ-194218-WT
Just Salad St-39
1050 NW 14 ST
OUTSIDE DININGAREA
1
Allapattah
Outdoor Seaxing
PZ-194219-WT
—I Boy Burgers LLC
2927 NW J AV
OPEN AIR RETAIL
1
All,.Ah
PZ-114242-WT
butcher and Sons
275 NEV 26th St
OUTSIDE DININGAREA
5
Wynwood/Edgewater
PZ-194320-WT
252 NW 25 ST-
252 NW 25 SF
OPEN AIR RETAIL
5
Wynwood/Edgewater
OUTDOOR SEATING
PZ-194321-WT
Maleon AP-1 en 1
2215W 12 ST
MULTIFAMILY
3
Do wmown Erickell
RESIDENCE
(Temporary at OMNI CRA
_
Bu11 d(ng)
PZ-19432J-WT
Wynwood Haus
1761 N MIAMI AV
MULTIFAMILY
RESIDENCE
2
Wynwood/Edgewater
PZ-194334-WT
Landshark Outdoor
401 BISCAYNE
FOOD SERVICE
2
Downtown Erickell
Dlning
BLVD, SURE R103
ESTABLISHMENT
(Temporary at OMNI CRI
Building)
PZ-19439J-WT
3556 oak ave warrant
3556 OAK AV
SINGLEFAMILY
RESIDENCE
2
CoconutG—
ESE -194428-WT
Miami Wodd Tower
700 NE I AV
MULTIFAMILY
2
Downtown Erickell
RESIDENCE
(Temporary 9 OMNI CRI
Bq ll ding)
PZ-194433-WT
Wynwood Starts Here
Restaurant
2000 NW 2AV
OPEN AIR RETAIL
5
O—own
PZ-11448E-WT
OPertown Yo uth
@I,—
450 NW 14 ST
COMMUNITY FAOLIW
5
OvetYown
PZ-194552-WT
Burdo Food and
2509 N MIAMI AV
OPEN AIR RETAIL
2
Wynwood/Edgewater
PZ-194565-WT
Dank,
3015 GRAND AVE-
3015 GRAND AV
OUTSIDE DININGAREA
2
Cowool Grove
P2194605 WT
OUTDOORSEATING
WARRANT
201 NE 82nd ST
OUTDOOR INNING
201 NE 82 ST
OPEN AIR RETAIL
5
DttleIT—
ESE -194645-WT
WARRANT
1604 NW]AV
1604 NW 7AV
MULTIFAMILY
1
Allap—h
RESIDENCE
PZ-194771-WT
Braman Dealership
2060 BISCAYNE
GENERAL COMM DECAL
2
Wynwood/Edgewater
Spedal SIM Pad:a ge
BLVD
PZ-194779-WT
B-1,,11 Wodd Plaza
600Brickell
GENERAL
2
Downtown Erickell
MUSE(a/k/a 600
Avenue
OCMMEROALMULTIFA
(Temporary at OMNI CRA
Bnd:e11 MUSP) Order
MILY RESIDENCE,OFFICE
Building)
No.CIS -oo40
P7.19.4801.WT
1, 13SW, STREET
OUTDO ORDINING
1513 SW 8ST
FOOD SERVIGO
ESTABLISHMENT
3
11ttle Havana
PZ-194EN5-WT
WARRANT
Mlaml IT, ELF hou,e
601 SW 8AV
COMMUNIW SUPPORT
3
Little Havana
20"
Modlfl--OT,pansl o:
FAQUTY
P2194829WT
3401 NE 1ST AVE OL23401
WARRANT
NE 1 AV CU 2
OUTSIDE DININGAREA
2
Wynwood/Edgewater
ESE -194893-WT
International Food
3401 NE S AV CU5
OPEN AIR RETAIL
2
Wynwood/Edgewater
Ventures, LLO BEENThal
Express
,
PZ-194908-WT
Intown-Outdoor
1900 SW 8ST
OPEN AIR RETAIL
3
Lttle Havana
Dlning
PZ-1141E2-WT
Otlpotl E F-I,Ell
891S MIAMI AV
OPEN AIR RETAIL
2
Downtown Erickell
Page 3 of 6
(Temporary at OMNI CRA
_
Bullding)-
Tranaett
DIM, fFrst
Date of
Fnal Decsion
Final
Posting Date
Application Status
Zone
Notiie
Renotice
can of be issued
Decision
PH.".:
(Issuance)
T5
03/10/2020
04/09/2020
04/27/2020
04/27/2020
Final Dedsion
Com pl,t,/Ready for
Public Hearing
a
08/18/2020
09/17/2020
04/16/2021
04/16/2021
Final Dedslon
Com pl rt,/Ready for
Public Hearing
T6
02/18/2020
03/19/2020
04/16/2020
04/16/2020
Final Dedsion
Com p11,/Ready for
Public Hearing
T6
11/21/2019
12/21/2019
OI/o3/2020
01/03/2020
Final Dedslon
Com p11,/Ready for
Public Hearing
T4
10/11/2019
11/10/2019
11/19/2019
11/19/2019
F1 nal Dedsion
Com p11 e/Ready for
Publl c. Hearing
T6
05/20/2020
06/19/2020
08/31/2020
08/31/2020
Final Dedslon
Com p11 e/Ready for
Pubh c Ueanng
T5
02/06/2020
03/07/2020
03/23/2020
04/10/2020
Final Dec sl on'
Com pl 0,/Ready for
Pub llc Hearing
T4
03/11/2020
04/l0/2020
04/20/2020
04/20/2020
Final DE-
-- pl et ,/Ready for
Public Hearing
T6
04/23/2020
05/23/2020
05/28/2020
05/28/2020
Flnel Dedslon
Com pl 1,/Ready for
_
Public Hearing
TS
12/17/2019
12/17/2019
01/16/2020
OF/28/2020
01/28/2020
Flnel Dedslon
Com pl et e/Ready for
Pu bl—earing,
ClHD12/17/2019
01/16/2020
02/05/2020
02/F5/2020
F—I DE--
Com pl et ,/Ready for
Public Hearing
D2
07/17/2020
OB/16/202o
O9/o2/2020
09/02/2020
Final DE-
-- pl et ,/Ready for
Public Hearing
12/20/2019
01/11/2020
02/19/2020
02/11/2020
Final Dedslon
Com plee/Ready for
Public Hearing
T5
02/20/2020
02/20/2020
03/21/2020
05/12/2020
05/12/2020
F—I Dedson
Com p11,/Ready for
_
Public Hearing
T6
l0/08/2020
11/02/2020
11/13/2020
11/13/2020
Final Dedslon
Com pl et ,/Ready for
Public Hearing
T6
0225/2020
03/26/2020
08/05/2020
08/05/2020
Flnel Dedslon
Com pl et ,/Ready for
Pu blI, Hearing
T6
10/11/2019
11/10/2019
lP/22/2019
11/22/2019
Fl nal DE-
-- pl et,/Ready for
Pu b ll c Hearing
T3
015/10/2020
07/10/2020
07/31/2020
07/31/2020
Final DE-
-- pl et,/Ready for
Public Hearing
T6
03/31/2020
04/30/2020
11/25/2020
11/25/2020
Final D—Ron
Com pl et ,/Ready for
Pub lie Hearine
T5
03/30/2020
04/29/2020
05/15/2020
05/15/2020
Final DE-
-- pl et,/Ready for
Pu blI, Hearing
CE
11/122019
12/12/2019
12/13/2019
12/13/2019
Final DE --
CA, pl H e/REady for
_
Public Hearine
T6
01/04/2021
02/03/2021
02/04/2021
02/04/2021
Final Dedslon
Com pl H e/REady f or
Publl c Hearine
TS
11/122019
12/12/2019
0221/2020
02/21/2020
Final Dedslon
Com pl et ,/Ready for
Pu b ll c Hearine
T6
04/30/2020
05/30/2020
12/18/2020
12/18/2020
Final Dedslon
Com pl et,/Ready for
Public NSA,—
Cl HD
10/14/2020
11/13/2020
04/09/2021
04/09/2021
Final D—Ron
Com p11,/Ready for
Public Hearine
T6
04/17/2020
05/17/2020
07/03/2020
07/03/2020
Final Dedslon
Com Piet ,/Ready for
_
Pu b ll c Hearine
T6
07/08/2020
08/07/2020
09/29/2020
09/29/2020
Final Dedslon
Com p11,/Ready for
Public Hearing
T6
08/20/2020
09/19/2020
01/20/2021
01/20/2021
Final DE-
-- pl et,/Ready for
Public HE —g
T5
07/28/2020
08/21/2020
O9/o3/2020
09/03/2020
Final DE-
-- pl et,/Ready for
Public Hearing
T6
01/30/2020
02/29/2020
03/24/2020
04/10/2020
Final DE-
-- pl et,/Ready for
Public Hearine
T6
01/21/2020
02/20/2020
02/21/2020
02/21/2020
Final D—Ron
C— PI"/Read, for
Public Hearine
T4
03/12/2020
04/11/2020
04/14/2020
04/14/2020
Final Dedsion
Com p1,t,/Ready for
Public Hearing
T6
03/16/2020
04/15/2020
04/30/2020
04/30/2020
Final Dedslon
9/9/2021 12.05.1
�RIWbI et ,/Ready f or
Public Hearing
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report W
Appendices
Warrarit Number
Pcolect Name:
Address
Use
Comm.
NETt—
IF--dt
Date af: Frst
Date of Fnal Dec sion
Final
Porting Date
Application Status
Dicfda
Zone
N.k.
Renotice can of be issued
Decision
PH.".:
(Issuance)
PZ-19501]-WT
Miami Moto Stop-
2650NE2AV
AUTO RELATED
2
Wynwood/Edgewater
T6
03/10/2020
04/09/2020
04/23/2020
04/23/2020
Final D'dsion
Warrant
OCMMERCIALESTAB,
Com pl,t,/Ready for
Public Hearing
PZ-195050-WT
Car Wash
1354 NW 27th
AUTO RELATED
1
Allapattah
02/27/2021
03/29/2021
05/11/2021
05/11/2021
Final Ded Slon
Replacement
Avenue
OCMMERCIALESTAB,
Com pl,t,/Ready for
Public Hearing
PZ-195064-WT
CHIPOTIE LEJEUNE
110 NW 42 AV
OPEN AIR RETAIL
4
Fla -
T6
03/16/2020
04/15/2020
05/15/2020
05/15/2020
Fl nal D'dsion
Com p1 et e/Ready for
Public Hearing
PZ-195083-WT
Rlce Mediterranean
2500 BISCAYNE
OPENAIRRETAIL
2
Wynwood/Edgewater
T6
OS/07/2020
015/015/2020
06/11/2020
06/11/2020
Final Dedslon
Kitchen
BLVD
C—plete/Readyfor
Public Hearing
PZ-195089-WT
Puccis Pizza Baysid'
401 BISCAYNE
OPEN AIR RETAIL
2
Downtown Erickell
T6
07/23/2020
08/22/2020
09/10/2020
09/10/2020
Fl nal D'dsion
BLVD 1118
(Temporary at OMNI OW,
Com p1,t'/Read y for
Building)
Publi c. Hearing
PZ-195149-WT
Ad ult Day Care
1968 NW 7ST
ADULT DAYCARE
3
Marlins Park
T6
05/08/2020
06/07/2020
07/09/2020
07/09/2020
Final Dedslon
Com p1 O '/Ready for
_
Pub lic Heanng
PZ 195128 WT
Doudas Park
2795 SW 37 AV
COMMUNITY FAOLIW
2
—1 Way
CS
0,1CM/2020
05/24/2020
03/30/2021
03/30/2021
Final Dedslon
Community C,nter
C,I PIAe/Readyfor
Public Hearing
PZ-195494-WT
LERNER OUTDOOR
313 NW 25 ST
GENERAL
5
Wynwood/Edgewater
T5
l0/222020
11/21/2020
D3/27/2o21
04/27/2021
Final Dedslon
SEATING WARRANT
COMMEROAL,OUTSIDE
Com PIAE/Ready for
DI NINE AREA
Public Hearing
PZ-19676-WT
Cocowalk
3015 G—d Ave
GEN ERAL COMM ERO AL
2
Co IFLI mve
10/02/2019
11/01/2019
11/20/2019
11/20/2019
Final Dedslon
Com Piet '/Ready for
Public Hearing
PZ-19-715-WT
M,C
2988 MC FARLANE
OUTSIDE DINING AREA
2
COCONUT GROVE
TS
04/17/2019
05/17/2019
07/02/2019
07/022019
Final Dedslon
ID
Com Y C'/Ready for
_
Pu bll, Hearing
PZ-19840-WT
Oasis Wynwood
2301 NE MIAMI CT
ALCOHOL BEVERAGE
2
WYNWOOD-EDGEWATER
T5,T6
11/19/2020
12/19/2020
O1A21/2o21
01/21/2021
Fl nal Dedslon
Wanant
SERVICE ATAB.
Com J AE/Ready for
Public Hearing
PZ-1986J-WT
Aguamanna
375 NW 7ST
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
5
OVERTOWN
T6
1226/2019
01/25/2020
09/28/2020
09/28/2020
Final Dedslon
Elam emery
Com Y C'/Ready for
Public Hearing
PZ-19879-WT
Grove Baylnv--H
2640SBAVSHORE
OUTSIDE DINING AREA
2
COCONUT GROVE
CS
01/01/2019
01/31/2019
09/12/2019
09/122019
Fl nel Dedslon
Group LLC
DR
Com pl M'/R'ad y for
_
Public Hearing
PZ-19880-WT
PEA Fern lEll, Park
2304 NW 14 Street
RECEATI ONAL FAQ LITY
1
ALtAPATTAH
06/27/2019
07/27/2019
09/10/2019
09/10/2019
Final D'd'I,n
Com pl,t '/Ready for
_
Pub ll c Hearing
PZ-19894-WT
Art Plaza O,tdoor
1336 NE 1AV
GENERAL COMMEROAL
2
DOWNTOWN-BRIONELL
T6
04/19/2019
05/19/2019
06/19/2019
06/19/2019
Final Dedslon
Dlnulpg
(TEMPORARY AT OMNI CRA
Com plM'/R'ady for
BUILDING)
Public Hearing
PZ-201640-WT
2804-2838 NW 1A-
2804 NW
GENERAL
5
Wynwood/Edgewater
TS,T6
09/02/2020
10/02/2020
05/05/2021
05/05/2021
Flnel Dedslon
MIND CIAL,MULTIFA
ComplCe/Readyfor
MILY RESIDENCE
Pu bllc Hearing
PZ-205825-WT
Extra Space Storage
212 NE 26th St
GENERAL COMMEROAL
2
Wynwood/Edgewater
T6
01/06/2021
02/05/2021
03/04/2021
03/04/2021
Final Dedslon
Com PIA'/Ready for
_
Pub 1, Heari
RE 20 51327 WT
Extra Space Storage
212 NE 26 ST
GENERAL COMMEROAL
2
Wynwood/Edgewater
01/06/2021
02/05/2021
03/04/2021
03/04/2021
Final Dedslon
Com PIA'/Ready for
_
Public Hearine
PZ-20-5832-WT
Palo Cl am o
350 NE 24 ST 109
OPEN AIR RETAIL
2
Wynwood/Edgewater
T6
08/21/2020
09/20/2020
01/29/2021
01/29/2021
Final D—Ron
Com PIA'/Ready for
Public Hearine
PZ-205868-WT
Tesla Automotive Use
111 NE 41 ST 125
AUTO RELATED
5
Wynwood/Edgewater
T5
06/24/2020
07/24/2020
08/17/2020
OB/17/2020
Final Dedslon
OCMMERCALESTAB.
Com Y A'/Ready for
Pu bll, Hearing
PZ-206125-WT
1495 NW 3AV
1495 NW 3AV
FOOD SERVICE
5
0v1-1
TS
01/05/2021
02/04/2021
02/04/2021
02/04/2021
Final Dedslon
ESTABUSHM ENT
Com PI H'/R'ady for
Public Hearine
PZ-20 S128-WT
VR COUTURE
3333 RICE ST 103
ALCOHOL BEVERAGE
2
CoconutGrov'
T5
06/10/2020
07/10/2020
07/23/2020
07/23/2020
Final Dedslon
SERVICE ESTAB., FOOD
Com PI H'/R'ady f or
SERVICE ESTABLISHMENT
Public Hearing
PZ-20 S122-WT
Firs[ Qtizens Bank
2601SBAYSHORE
GENERAL COMM EROAL
2
CoconO[Grove
T6
06/122020
07/12/2020
07/14/2020
02/14/2020
Final Dedslon
DR
Com pI A'/Ready for
Public Hearine
PZ 206207 WT
Bay ofP E, —onal
5665 SW 3ST
RECFATI ONAL FAO LITY
4
Flagaml
CS
04/01/2021
05/01/2021
06/09/2021
06/09/2021
Fl nal Dedslon
Park Im pro—EIIHs
Com pl et e/Ready for
Public Hearine
PZ-20626]-WT
519 NW 26 ST-
519 NW 26 ST
ALCOHOL BEVERAGE
5
Wynwood/Edgewater
DI
08/05/2020
09/04/2020
09/23/2020
09/23/2020
Final Dedslon
ALCOHOL WARRANT
SERVICE ESTAB.
Com PIH,/R,Fd, for
Pub li c Hearin'
PZ-20632]-WT
AI DAY
3306 MARY ST
ALCOHOL BEVERAGE
2
Coconut G—,
T5
10/23/2020
11/22/2020
12/01/2020
12/01/2020
Final D'dsion
SERVICE ES TAB.
C—dUF Ready for
Public Hearin'
PZ-206333-WT
PF—Urbano 41
3725 NW 24 AV
MULTIFAMILY
1
Allapattah
TS
09/25/2020
10/25/2020
11/24/2020
11/24/2020
Final Dedslon
RESIDENCE
Com pl'[,/Ready for
_
Public Hearine
PZ 206445 WT
Shenandoah Prak and
2111 SW 19 ST
COMMUN17
4
mral Way
CS
07/17/2020
08/16/2020
12/02/2020
12/022020
Final Dedslon
New Swlm m Ug Pool
FAOUTY,RECEATI ONAL
Com pl A'/Read y for
Fedltty
FAOUTY
_
Public Hearine,
PZ-20 A528-WT
CHUGS OUTDOOR
3444 MAIN HWY
OPEN AIR RETAIL
2
CO cF,,l Grove
T5
OB/21/2020
01/20/2020
11A25/2o20
11/25/2020
Final Dedslon
SEATING WARRANT
21
Com PIAE/Ready for
_
Public Hearine
P7.20-6543.WT
82 NW 28 ST.
82 NW 28 ST
ALCOHOL BEVERAGE
5
Wynwood/Edgewater
T5
08/27/2020
09/26/2020
10/21/2020
10/21/2020
Final Dedslon
ALCOHOL WARRANT
SERVICE ATAB.
Com Piet'/Ready for
Public Hearing
PZ-206609-WT
Stardust East
4039 NE IAV
AUTO RELATED
5
Wynwood/Edgewater
TS
09/23/2020
10/23/2020
11/13/2020
11/13/2020
Fl nal Dedslon
OCMMERCIALESTAB
Com p1,t,/Ready for
Public Hearing
PZ-206711-WT
Gann Art Caff'
3870 GRAND AV
FOOD SERVICE
2
Coconut G—,
T3
07/16/2020
08/15/2020
08/19/2020
08/19/2020
Final D'dsion
ESTABUSHM ENT
Com p1 et,/Ready for
Public Hearine
PZ-20EJ21-WT
14 Allapattah
1466 NW 36 ST
MULTIFAMILY
1
Allapattah
T6
11/122020
12/12/2020
01/13/2021
01/13/2021
Final Dedslon
RESIDENCE
Com PI H'/R'ady for
Pag e 4 of 6
9,/9/2021 12.05.12
PN b li a Hearin,
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report M
Appendices
Warrant Number
Profevt Name
Address
Use
Lamm:
NETt-
Dl dtE.
PZ-206843-WT
Mate, Academy
230 SW 17 RD
MIDDLE/HIGH SCHOOL
3
DowntownErick,II
(Temporary at OMNI CRA
SuIld,ne)
PZ-206853-WT
COOCWAIT
3015 GRANDAV
FOOD SERVICE
2
Caconut Grove
OUTDOOR SEATING
ESTABUSHMENT
PZ-206910-WT
The BP—I-P,R,ct
2990 MC FARLANE
FOOD SERVICE
2
Coconut Grove
RD
ESTABUSHMENT
PZ-28-J235-WT
Keufinen-Rossln
3318 MARV SF
GENERAL
2
Coconut 6mve
COMMEROAEOFFICE
PZ-20-7279-WT
Chase Bank
3550 BISCAYNE
INFRASTRUCTUREAND
2
Wynwood/Edgewater
BLVD
UTILITIES
PZ-20-7294-WT
2052 HOLDINGS LLC
2052 SW IST
MULTIFAMILY
3
RUI, Havana
RESIDENCE
PC 207459 WT
Bokato
151 NW 24 ST 102
OPEN AIR RETAIL
5
Wynwood/Edgewater
PZ-20-7465-WT
Flavors Grill
Restaurant
4433 NW 2AV
FOOD SERVICE
ESTAELSHMENT,OPEN
AIR RETAIL OUTSIDE
5
BUID Halt,
DI NINGAREA
PZ-20-7637-WT
G,nd View Park-
1559 NW 15 SLED
MULTIFAMILY
1
Allapattah
Res dential
RESIDENCE
Apprtments.
PZ-20-J661-WT
Arlo Hotel Wynwood
2217 NW MIAMI
HOTEL
5
Wynwood/Edgewater
(sigrage)
CT
PZ-20-JJ18-WT
Ho-S—IR, Joy Adult
4874 NW 7SF
COMMUNIW SUPPORT
1
Fd,-
Oey nere,INC
FACILITY
PZ-20-7719-WT
8JIS MIAMI AVE-
BJIS MIAMI AV
FOOD SERVICE
2
Downtown E-kell
ALCOHOL WARRANT
ESTABUSHMENT
(Tam porary at OMNI CRA
B,1 I;e)
PZ-20-7779-WT
Public Storagx
2851 SW 31 AV
GENERAL COMMERCIAL
2
C➢ral Way
PZ-20-7882-WT
1335 SW 4TH ST
1335 SW 4ST
MULTIFAMILY
3
IRUI, Havana
DEVELOPMENT
RESIDENCE
PZ-20-7884-WT
Odtdoor Dln,ng
3480 MAIN HWY
FOOD SERVICE
2
Coconut Grove
ESTABUSHMENT
PZ-20-7999-WT
M,em, Ad S,hool
225 NE 34 ST 203
SPECIAL
2
Wynwood/Edgewater
TRAINING/VOCATIONAL
PZ-20CORE -WT
Margarita v,lle
401 BISCAYNE
OPEN AIR RETAIL
2
Downtown F-kell
11011ER
(Temporary A OMNI CRI
SK,,10 HE7
PC 208165 WT
JEleven.1777
1200 NW 36 ST
AUTO RELATED
OCMMERCIALESTAB.
1
Allapattah
PC 208447 WT
Sw—G n
2621 NW 2AV
OPEN AIR RETAIL
5
Wynwood/Edgewater
Wynwood
PZ-20851J-WT
Kennedy Park
2440 South
RECEATI ONAL FAO LITY
2
Coconut Grove
PER,—E,,Idmg
Beyshore or.
PZ-20852J-WT
EOCZONE, LTC
222 SW SST
AUTO RELATED
3
Downtown E-kell
OCMMERCIALESFAB
(T,mporsry at OMNI CRA
PZ-208619-WT
PERRICONES-
1700 SW 3AV
OUTSIDE OININGAREA
3
Byi,l dlnel
L, the Hevena
PZ-20E678-WT
OUTDOORSFATING
WARRANT
Moore F....—,
172 NE 41 ST
FOOD SERVICE
5
Wynwood/Edgewater
e 101,g
ESTABUSHMENT
PC 208717 WT
24352445 NMA
ALCOHOL WARRANT
2435 N MIAMI AV
ALCOHOL BEVERAGE
SERVICE ESTAB.
2
Wynwood/Edgewater
PZ-208783-WT
SLATE MIAMI
2145 NO 36 ST
MULTIFAMILY
1
Allapattah
RESIDENCE
PZ-208805-WT
AURORA
1551 NW 1ST
MULTIFAMILY
3
Marlins Park
RESIDENCE
PZ-20-911]-WT
Pa iar'sn Am ara
3101 NE 7AV
GENERAL COMM DECAL
2
Wynwood/Edgewater
o utd oor d,ning
W arrant address
-dot
PZ-20-9146-WT
Th e R,ver Oyster Bar,
33 SE 7 SF
OPEN AI R RETAIL
2
Downtown Er,cke
Outdoor
(Temporary A OMNI CRI
__
Bull
PZ-20-9228-WT
210P IJcensefor
425 NE 22ST
FOOD SERVICE
2
Wynw/Edgood/Edgew e[er
Hideout Cafe
ESTABLISHMENT
PZ-20-9243-WT
Clv,ca
1050 NW 14 SF
GENERAL
1
Allapattah
MMMERCIA4tARGE
PZ-20-9316-WT
NO 15 AVE
1501 NO 14 ST
SCALE RETAIL
GENERAL COMMERCIAL
1
Allap—h
PZ-209331-WT
BALL AND OIAI N ARC
1513 SW 8ST
ALCOHOL BEVERAGE
3
RUI, Havana
SERV WARRANT
SERVIa ATAB,
MODIFICATION
PZ-20-9441-WT
Pu She StP-68111
5615 NE2AV
GENERAL COMM DECAL
5
Bttle Haiti.
Page 5 of 6
Tr..aet
DM, fFi,,t
Date of Final Decision
Final
Posting Date
Application Status
Zone
Notice
Ren 6. can of be issued
Decision
pnorm:
(Issuance)
T6
07/28/2021
07/28/2021
Final D,d5lon
Com pl D E/Ready for
Public Hearing
T5
03/19/2021
04/18/2021
06/17/2021
06/17/2021
Final Dedslon
Com pl,t,/R,ady for
Public H,arl,
T5
10/14/2020
11/13/2020
Fl nal D,d5lon
Com p1 et,/Ready for
Public IT, arin,¢
TS
1➢/30/2020
11/29/2020
12/03/2820
12/03/2020
Flnel Dedslon
C_pl et ,/Ready for
Public HearinR
T6
11/19/2020
12/19/2020
12/22/2020
12/22/2020
Fl nal D,d5lon
Com p1,t,/R,ady for
Publ,p Hearing
T6
11/23/2020
12/23/2020
12/28/2020
12/28/2020
Final Dedslon
C— p1,t,/R,ady for
Public '"
T5
10/23/2020
11/22/2020
12/11/2020
12/11/2020
Final Decl sl on
Com pl A[ /Ready for
Pub l,n Heering
T4
05/23/2021
06/24/2021
Pending2A/PD
Approval
T6
04/28/2021
05/28/2021
06/17/2021
06/17/2021
Final D,d5lon
Com p1 et,/Ready for
Public Hearing
T6
01/22/2021
02/21/2021
02/24/2021
02/24/2021
Hnel Dedslon
Com pl H ,/Ready f or
Pub l,a Hearing
T6
10/13/2020
11/12/2020
O1/04/2021
01/04/2021
Hnal Dedslon
Com pl et ,/Reedy for
Public Hearine
T6
09/30/2020
10/30/2020
11/04/2020
11/04/2020
Flnel Dedslon
Com pl et/Ready for
Publlp Hearing
Dl
03/22/2021
04/21/2021
05/17/2021
05/17/2021
Final Dedslon
Com PI,t,/RAdd y for
Pu b ll c Hearine
T4
01/20/2021
02/19/2021
03/09/2021
03/09/2021
Final Dedslon
Com p1,t,/R,ady for
Public Hearine
T5
11/16/2020
11/16/2020 12/16/2020
02/08/2021
02/OB/2021
Final Dedslon
Com p1 et,/Ready for
Public IT, ar,,A
T6
08/19/2020
09/18/2020
09/24/2020
09/24/2020
Flnel Dedslon
Com pI H ,/Ready for
Publla Hearine,
T6
07/15/2021
08/14/2021
OB/24/2021
08/24/2021
Final Dedslon
Com pl et ,/Ready for
Public Heering
T5,T6
01/06/2020
02/05/2020
05/17/2021
05/17/2021
Final D'ds,on
C_PI,t /R'ady for
Pu b 1, c Hearine
T5
02/01/2021
03/03/2021
03/05/2021
03/05/2021
Final Dedslon
Com pl et ,/Ready for
Public Heering
11/19/2020
12/19/2020
02/19/2021
02/19/2021
Hnal Dedslon
Com pl A,/Reedy for
Pu blla Hearing
T6
02/01/2021
03/11/2021
O3/29/2021
03/29/2021
Flnel Dedslon
Com pl et e/Ready for
PubIlc IT,arine
T6
01/14/2021
02/13/2021
0226/2021
0226/2021
Flnel Dedslon
Com pl A[ /Reedy for
Publl a Hear in e,
T5
02/09/2021
03/11/2021
03/15/2021
03/15/2021
FI nal Dedslon
Com pl et ,/Ready for
Public Hearine
T6
03/03/2021
04/07/2021
05/18/2021
05/18/2021
Final Dedslon
Com p1't'/R'ady for
Public HE --
TO
11/04/2020
12/04/2020
12/17/2020
12/17/2020
Staff R—ARS Com pie[,
T5
06/09/2021
07/09/2021
08/23/2021
08/23/2021
Final Dedslon
Com p1,t,/R,ady for
Public Hearine
T6
12/06/2018
01/05/2019
11/18/2020
11/18/2020
Final Dedslon
C_ PI,'/R'ady for
Pu b 1, c Hearing
T6
02/01/2021
03/03/2021
03/15/2021
03/15/2021
Final Dedslon
Com pl et ,/Reedy for
Public IT--
T6
02/04/2021
03/06/2021
03/16/2021
03/16/2021
Hnel Dedslon
Com pl et ,/Reedy for
Public Heering
ClHD02/26/2021
03/28/2021
04/29/2021
04/29/2021
Final Dedslon
Com pl et ,/Ready for
Public IT--
T6
12/10/2020
01/09/2021
03/04/2021
03/04/2021
Final Dedson
Com p't'/R'ady for
Public Hearine
T6
02/18/2021
03/20/2021
04/15/2021
04/15/2021
Final Dedslon
Com p1,t,/R,ady for
Public H,ar,ne
T5
05/b/2021
06/16/2021
06/17/2021
06/17/2021
Final D,d5lon
Com pl et ,/Ready for
9,/9/2021 12.05.12
PX'l , Hearin e
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report M
Appendices
Warrant Number Project Name
:Address
Use
Comm. NETArea Transact
Drte of First
Date of Final Decision
Final
Porting Date
Application!It—
DitHa Znne
Notice
Renotice canof be issued
to:
Decision
(Issuance)
PZ-20-9451-WT Publlc Storage 68110
91 SW 3ST
GENERAL COMMEROAL
2 D—t... B-kell T6
03/11/2021
prior
04/10/2.1
04/16/2021
04/16/2021
F—I Meclslon
(Temporary at OMNI O?A
Com plete/Ready for
cud dl ng)
Pub II c Hearin g
PZ-20-984E-WT Bodege Co conut
3419 MAIN HWV
ALCOHOL BEVERAGE
2 moms[ G,— TS
06/07/2021
07/07/2021
08/05/2021
08/05/2021
Flnel('eclslon
Grove LLC
SERVICEESTA8.,FOOD
Com plH.O—dy for
SERVICE ES/ABU S HMENT
Publlc Hearing
PZ-20-9881-WT Pobllc Storage 72178
233 BI—NE
GENERAL COMMEROAL
2 Wynwood/Edgewater T6
04/12/2020
05/12/2020
06/03/2021
06/03/2021
Fln IM,,l—,
BLVO
Co, plae/Reedy for
Pub II c Hearin g
PZ-21-10565-WT SOCOTERS/EVES-
2401 NW SAV2
AUTO RELATED
5 Wynwood/Edgewater TS
07/16/2021
08/15/2021
0E/215/-1
08/26/2021
Flnel(teclslon
Auto Related
&—,E
C']MMEICIALESTIB.
Comploo-dyfor
mm m eraal
Pub II c Hearin g
Page 6 of 6 9/9/2021 12:05:12 PM
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report M
Appendices
APPENDIX E.
INFORMATION RELATING TO WAIVERS
Approved Waivers from 2019 — 2021(351 Total)
Transact
Date of First
Plan
Final Decision
Final Decision
Application
Waiver Number
Project Name
Address
Use
NETArea
cannot be issued
(issuance)Date
Zone
Notice
Reviewer
priorto:
and Posting Date
Status
GENERAL
COCONUT
Yaremy
Final Decision
PZ-18-430-WA
3428 Grand Avenue
3428 GRAND AV
COMMERCIAL
GROVE
T5
02/13/2019
Vega
03/15/2019
05/06/2019
Complete/Ready
TWO NEW APART.
Final Decision
PZ-18-316-WA
UNITS AT EXISTING
3731NW20AVE
MULTIFAMILY
ALLAPATTAH
T5
02/08/2019
Yaremy
03/10/2019
06/18/2019
Complete/Ready
BUILDING
RESIDENCE
Vega
for Public
2492 LINCOLN
SINGLE FAMILY
COCONUT
Yaremy
Final Decision
PZ-18-381-WA
Lincoln Ave Duplex
AV
RESIDENCE
GROVE
T3
02/05/2019
Vega
03/07/2019
05/06/2019
Complete/Ready
3545 Grand
GENERAL
COCONUT
Yaremy
Final Decision
PZ-18-429-WA
3545 Grand Avenue
Avenue
COMMERCIAL
GROVE
02/07/2019
Vega
03/09/2019
05/06/2019
Complete/Ready
SINGLE FAMILY
COCONUT
Yaremy
Final Decon
PZ-18-277-WA
55 Samana Drive
55 Samana Drive
RESIDENCE
GROVE
T3
02/20/2019
Vega
03/22/2019
05/06/2019
Complete/Ready
Vilma Family
SINGLE FAMILY
COCONUT
Yaremy
Final Decision
PZ 19732 WA
Residence
3962 PARKAV
RESIDENCE
GROVE
03/OS/2019
Vega
04/04/2019
OS/06/2019
Complete/Ready
Parking and
TWO FAMILY
Yaremy
Final Decision
PZ-18-589-WA
walkway at 3673
36735W 255f
RESIDENCE
CORAL WAY
T3
02/15/2019
Vega
03/17/2019
07j24/2019
Complete/Ready
3575 Battersea
3575 BATTERSEA
SINGLE FAMILY
COCONUT
Yaremy
Final Decision
PZ-18-465-WA
Prop Wall Demo
RD
RESIDENCE
GROVE
03/22/2019
Vega
04/21/2019
OS/21/2019
Complete/Ready
MULTIFAMILY
UPPER
Yaremy
Final Decision
PZ-18-374-WA
622 NE 80th ST
622 NE 80ST
RESIDENCE
EASTSIDE
T6
03/28/2019
Vega
04/27/2019
08/01/2019
Complete/Ready
3595 Battersea
3595 BATTERSEA
SINGLE FAMILY
COCONUT
Kimberly
Final Decon
PZ 18-0b7 WA
Total Demo
RD
RESIDENCE
GROVE
04/10/2019
Marcellus
OS/10/2019
OS/20/2019
Complete/Ready
3860 Stewart
SINGLE FAMILY
COCONUT
Yaremy
Final Decision
PZ-18-328-WA
38605tewart Ave
Ave
RESIDENCE
GROVE
04/08/2079
Vey
OS/08/2079
OS%20/2079
Complete/Ready
Application for
Final Decision
PZ-18-593-WA
Waiversfor 3307
3307 DEVON CT
SINGLE FAMILY
COCONUT
T3
04/10/2019
Suhey Rojas
05/10/2019
06/12/2019
Complete/Ready
Devon Court
RESIDENCE
GROVE
for Public
3775 Stewart
3775 STEWART
SINGLE FAMILY
COCONUT
Kimberly
Final Decision
PZ-19-1959-WA
Avenue
AV
RESIDENCE
GROVE
OS/07/2019
Marcellus
06/06/2019
06/10/2019
Complete/Ready
TWO FAMILY
Yaremy
Final Decision
PZ-18-372-WA
DUPLEX
1794SW9ST
RESIDENCE
CORALWAY
T3
02/21/2019
ea
g
03/23/2019
06/18/2019
Corm late Rea d
P / y
SINGLE FAMILY
Yaremy
Final Decision
PZ-19-1931-WA
Pulleys House
5821SW3ST
RESIDENCE
FLAGAMI
T3
05/09/2019
Vega
06/08/2019
08/26/2019
Complete/Ready
2990 EMATHLA
SINGLE FAMILY
COCONUT
Yaremy
Final Decision
PZ-19-2384-WA
2990 Emath la St
ST
RESIDENCE
GROVE
04/19/2019
Vey
OS/19/2019
06/18/2019
Complete/Ready
TWO
COCONUT
Final Decision
PZ-18-380-WA
Mary St Duplex
3081MARYST
RESIDENCE
RESIDENCE
GROVE
T3
05/23/2019
Suhey Rojas
06/22/2019
06/28/2019
Co
2551 TIGERTAIL-
2551 TIGERTAIL
SINGLE FAMILY
COCONUT
Yaremy
Final Decision
PZ-19-1983-WA
DEMO WAIVER
AV
RESIDENCE
GROVE
T3
05/24/2019
Vega
06/23/2019
07/22/2019
Complete/Ready
MULTIFAMILY
Jonathan
Final Decision
PZ-18-323-WA
798 NW 70th St
798NW70ST
RESIDENCE
MODEL CITY
T4
05/20/2019
Thole
06/19/2019
07/18/2019
Complete/Ready
2 451 TIGERTAIL
SINGLE FAMILY
COCONUT
Yaremy
Final Decon
PZ-19-677-WA
2451Tigertail Ave
AV
RESIDENCE
GROVE
T3
06/12/2019
Vega
07/12/2019
07/22/2019
Complete/Ready
SINGLE FAMILY
Kimberly
Final Decision
PZ-19-2703-WA
51 NE 59 Terr.
51 NE 59 Terrace
RESIDENCE
LITTLE HAITI
06/17/2019
Marcellus
07/17/2019
08/19/2019
Complete/Ready
1677ONAWAY
SINGLE FAMILY
COCONUT
Yaremy
Final Decision
PZ-19-997-WA
1677 onaway dr
T3
06/17/2019
07/17/2019
07/22/2019
DR
RESIDENCE
GROVE
Vega
Complete/Ready
TWO FAMILY
COCONUT
Yaremy
Final Decision
PZ-18-379-WA
mary st duplex
3075MARYST
RESIDENCE
GROVE
T3
05/14/2019
Vega
07/24/2019
07%25/2019
Complete/Ready
4065 Bonita
SINGLE FAMILY
COCONUT
Final Decision
PZ-19-2736-WA
4065 BONITA AV
T3
07/18/2019
Suhey Rojas
08/17/2019
08/26/2019
Demolition
RESIDENCE
GROVE
Complete/Ready
3117 indiana st
TWO FAMILY
COCONUT
Yaremy
Final Decision
PZ-19-2335-WA
duplex
3117 INDIANA ST
RESIDENCE
GROVE
T3
06/24/2019
Vega
08/02/2019
08/19/2019
Complete/Ready
SINGLE FAMILY
COCONUT
Final Decon
PZ-19-2696-WA
3910 Utopia Court
3910 UTOPIA CT
T3
06/19/2019
Suhey Rojas
07/19/2019
08/27/2019
RESIDENCE
GROVE
Complete/Ready
SINGLE FAMILY
Decision
PZ-19-731-WA
1816 SW 23 St.
18165W 23 ST
RESIDENCE
CORAL WAY
T3
06/13/2019
Suhey Rojas
07/13/2019
10/13/2019
CFinal
omplete/Ready
3112 mcdonald st
3112 MC
TWO FAMILY
COCONUT
Yaremy
Final Decision
PZ-19-2339-WA
duplex
DONALD ST
RESIDENCE
GROVE
06/24/2019
Vega
OS/08/2019
OS/26/2019
Complete/Ready
3525 POINCIANA
SINGLE FAMILY
COCONUT
Kimberly
Final Decision
PZ-18-203-WA
Poinciana 1
AV
RESIDENCE
GROVE
T3
07/19/2019
Marcellus
08/18/2019
08/26/2019
Complete/Ready
R15 TEO.UFSTA
SINGLE FAMILY
COCONUT
Kimberly
Final Decision
PZ-19-2505-WA
2215 tequesta
LN
RESIDENCE
GROVE
07/17/2019
Marcellus
OS/16/2019
08%26/2019
Complete/Ready
SINGLE FAMILY
Coconut
Kimberly
Final Decision
PZ-19-3411-WA
380 ohio st demo
3180 ohio st
RESIDENCE
Grove
07/26/2019
Marcellus
OS/25/2019
08/26/2019
Complete/Ready
TWO FAMILY
Kimberly
Final Decon
PZ-19-3833-WA
Cueto Residence
2850SW 36 AV
RESIDENCE
Coral Way
T3
07/24/2019
Marcellus
08/23/2019
08/26/2019
Complete/Ready
1790 FAIRHAVEN
SINGLE FAMILY
Coconut
Yaremy
Final Decision
PZ-19-3459-WA
Demolition Waiver
08/10/2019
09/09/2019
09/23/2019
PL
RESIDENCE
Grove
Vega
Complete/Ready
Page 1 of 9 9/9/2021 12:07:02 PM
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report M
Appendices
Transect
Dateaf First
Plan
Final Decision
Final Decision
Application
Waiver Number
Project Name
Address
Use
fJ ETAreg
cannot be issued
(issuance)Date
Zone.
Notice
Reviewer
pnorto:
and Posting Date
Status
TWO FAMILY
COCONUT
Yaremy
Final Decision
PZ-19-817-WA
3081 mary st duplex
3081MARYST
T3
08/O1/2019
08/31/2019
10/13/2019
RESIDENCE
GROVE
Vega
Complete/Ready
Two Family
TWO FAMILY
Jonathan
Final Decision
PZ-19-2394-WA
Residence
5445 NW 5 Court
RESIDENCE
LITTLE HAITI
07/17/2019
Thole
OS/16/20J9
09/27/2019
Complete/Ready
GENERAL
Final Decision
PZ-19-2507-WA
Mo xy W ynwood
255 NW 25 ST
COMMERCIAL
WYNWOo0.
T5
07 30 2019
/ /
Jacob Keirn
08 29 2019
//
09 16 2019
//
Complete/Ready
Com Read
P/ y
HOTEL
EDGEWATER
for Public
3515 POINCIANA
SINGLE FAMILY
COCONUT
Kimberly
Final Decision
PZ-18-354-WA
Poinciana g
AV
RESIDENCE
GROVE
08/]3/2019
Marcellus
09/12/20J9
10/J3/20 J9
Complete/Ready
SINGLE FAMILY
Kimberly
Final Decision
PZ-19-3669-WA
1901 home
1901 SW 36 CT
Coral Way
T3
08/20/2019
09/19/2019
11/18/2019
Complete/Ready
RESIDENCE
Marcellus
DOWNTOWN
Final Decision
GENERAL
BRICKELL
Yaremy
Complete/Ready
PZ-19-3102-WA
900 SW 2nd Avenue
900SW2AV
COMMERCIAL,
(TEMPORARY
T6
08/07/2019
09/06/2019
11/22/2019
HOTEL
AT OMNI CRA
Vega
for Public
BUILDING)
Hearing
GENERAL
Final Decision
COMMERCIAL,
WYNW000.
Kimberly
Complete/Ready
PZ-19-3215-WA
Wynwood27
129NW26ST
T5
08/09/2019
09/08/2019
11/19/2019
MULTIFAMILY
EDGEWATER
Marcellus
for Public
RESIDENCE
Hearing
SINGLE FAMILY
COCONUT
Final Decision
PZ-19-2299-WA
4115 PARKAVENUE
4115 PARKAV
T3
07/25/2019
Suhey Rojas
08/24/2019
11/04/2019
RESIDENCE
GROVE
Complete/Ready
Final Decision
PZ-19-3171-WA
Xydas Residence
3421 N
SINGLE FAMILY
Coconut
T3
07/26/2019
Suhey Rojas
09/23/2019
1011.3/2019
Complete/Ready
MOORINGS WAY
RESIDENCE
Grove
for Public
DOWNTOWN
Final Decision
888SE BRICKELL.
GENERAL
BRICKELL
Complete/Ready
PZ-18-536-WA
888 Brickell Plaza
COMMERCIAL,
(TEMPORARY
T6
07/03/2019
Jacob Keirn
08/02/2019
11/12/2019
PLZ
OFFICE
ATOMNICRA
for Public
Hearing
BUILDING)
SINGLE FAMILY
Coconut
Kimberly
Final Decision
PZ-19-2906-WA
2740 Kirk Street
2740 KIRK ST
RESIDENCE
Grove
T3
09/20/2019
Marcellus
10/20/2019
11/11/2019
Complete/Ready
1924, 1830, NW 1st
Final Decision
1837NW Flagler
MULTIFAMILY
LITTLE
Jonathan
Complete/Ready
PZ-19-2675-WA
Terrace Miami, FL
1824NW 1stST
RESIDENCE
HAVANA
T4
08/22/2019
Thole
09/21/2019
11/07/2019
for Public
33125
Hearing
SINGLE FAMILY
JoTholeathan
n
Decision
PZ-19-2905-WA
Laundry Room
21055W 12 ST
CORAL WAY
T3
07/10/2019
O8/09/2019
11/OS/2019
RESIDENCE
CFinal
omplete/Ready
GENERAL
Final Decision
COMMERCIAL,
Yaremy
Complete/Ready
PZ-19-2140-WA
16 Allapattah
1625NW20ST
MULTIFAMILY
ALLAPATTAH
T6
07/23/2019
Vega
08/22/2019
12/16/2019
for Public
RESIDENCE
Hearing
GENERAL
Final Decision
PZ-19-2138-WA
2734NW1
2734 NW 1AV
COMMERCIAL,
WYNWOOD-
T5
09/27/2019
Jacob Keirn
10/27/2019
11/04/2019
Complete/Ready
OFFICE
EDGEWATER
for Public
SINGLE FAMILY
Jonathan
Final Decision
PZ-19-1997-WA
2712 NW 12 Ave.
2712 NW 12 AVE.
RESIDENCE
ALLAPATTAH
T4
07/12/2019
Thole
08111/2019
10/29/2019
Complete/Ready
MULTIFAMILY
Kimberly
Final Decision
PZ-19-3209-WA
1712SW10St
1712SW105T
RESIDENCE
CORALWAY
T3
09/3O/2019
Marcellus
10/30/2019
11/22/2019
CompleteJRea dy
Michael Ramirez
SINGLE FAMILY
COCONUT
Kimberly
Final Decision
PZ-19-3169-WA
Residence
4041SW42AV
RESIDENCE
GROVE
T3
10/03/2019
Marcellus
11/02/2019
11/11/2019
Complete/Ready
TWO STORY
TWOFAMILY
Jonathan
Final Decision
PZ-19-874-WA
DUPLEX
2920 SW 33 CT
RESIDENCE
CORAL WAY
T3
OS/07/2019
Thole
09/06/2019
11/20/2019
Complete/Ready
lW0 FAMILY
Kimberly
Final Decision
PZ-19-4626-WA
S
Spirit NW
2138 NW 26 ST
RESIDENCE
AllaPattah
T3
10 09 / 2019
/
Marcellus
11/ 08/ 2019
11/ 22/ 2019
Complete/Ready
DAYAVENUE
2701 DAY
MULTIFAMILY
COCONUT
Final Decision
PZ-18-509-WA
08/Ol/2019
Jacob Keirn
08/31/2019
12/10/2019
APARTMENTS
AVENUE
RESIDENCE
GROVE
Complete/Ready
FOOD SERVICE
Final Decision
Wendys-2370SW
Kimberly
PZ193700WA
8ST
2370SW8ST
ESTABUSHMEN
T
Little Hawn.
T6
09/23/2019
Marcellus
10/23/2019
12/11/2019
Complete/Ready
for Public
COCONUT GROVE
Final Decision
PZ-18-606-WA
MEDICALCENTER
3831GRANDAV
GENERAL
COCONUT
09/26/2019
Jacob Keirn
10/26/2019
01/15/2020
Complete/Ready
CHI
COMMERCIAL
GROVE
for Public
TWO STORY
SINGLE FAMILY
Jonathan
Final Decision
PZ-19-875-WA
3331 SW 29 TER
CORALWAY
T3
08/07/2019
09/06/2019
11/20/2019
DUPLEX
RESIDENCE
Thole
Complete/Ready
Page 2 of 9 9/9/2021 12:07:02 PM
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report M
Transact
Date of First
Plan
Final Decision
Final Decision
Application
Waiver Number
Project Name
Address
Use
NET Area
cannot be issued
(Issuance) Date
Zona
Notice
Reviewer
priorto:
and Posting Date
Status
GENERAL
DOWNTOWN.
Final Decision
COMMERCIAL,
BRICKELL
Complete/Ready
PZ-19-635-WA
Downtown 5th
53 NE 5 ST
(TEMPORARY
T6
08/29/2019
Jacob Keirn
09/28/2019
12/04/2019
MULTIFAMILY
AT OMNI CPA
for Public
RESIDENCE
Hearing
BUILDING)
GENERAL
Final Decision
PZ-19-4048-WA
Biscayne
3047 BISCAYNE
COMMERCIAL,
Wynwood/Ed
T6
09/23/2019
Suhey Rojas
10/23/2019
12/10/2019
Complete/Ready
Development
BLVD
HOTEL, OFFICE
gewater
for Public
Lauris Quintana
COMMUNITY
Kimberly
Final Decision
PZ-19-4106-WA
2600SW10ST
Cora IWay
T4
01/10/2020
02/29/2020
01/02/2020
Property
RESIDENCE
Marcellus
Complete/Ready
1829 ESPANOLA
SINGLE FAMILY
Coconut
Georgina
Final Decision
PZ-19-4363-WA
Zanarini Residence
DR
RESIDENCE
Grove
T3
10/11/2019
DeCubas
12/08/2019
12/10/2019
Complete/Ready
3605 BATTERSEA
SINGLE FAMILY
Coconut
Georgina
Final Decision
PZ-19-4065-WA
3605 Battersea RD
RD
RESIDENCE
Grove
T3
08/21/2019
DeCubas
09/22/2019
12/10/2019
Complete/Ready
DOWNTOWN
Final Decision
1359 North
1359 North
SINGLE FAMILY
BRICKELL
Jonathan
Complete/Ready
PZ-19-2688-WA
Venetian Way-
)TEMPORARY
11/14/2019
12/14/2019
12/27/2019
New Lot
Venetian Way
RESIDENCE
AT OMNI CPA
Thole
for Public
BUILDING)
Hearing
DOWNTOWN
Final Decision
1353 North
1353 North
SINGLE FAMILY
BRICKELL
Jonathan
Complete/Ready
PZ-19-2678-WA
Venetian Way
Venetian Way
RESIDENCE .(TEMPORARY"
11/20/2019
Thole
12/20/2019
12/27/2019
for Public
AT OMNI CPA
Hearing
BUILDING)
GENERAL
Final Decision
COMMERCIAL,
Complete/Ready
PZ-19-2669-WT
Block45
152NW8ST
OVERTOWN
T6
09/23/2019
Jacob Keirn
10/23/2019
01/23/2020
MULTIFAMILY
for Public
RESIDENCE
Hearing
MULTIFAMILY
Jonathan
Final Decision
PZ-19-2258-WA
New Life
2101 NW 36 ST
RESIDENCE
ALLAPATTAH
T5
05/23/2019
Thole
06/22/2019
02/11/2020
Complete/Ready
GENERAL
Final Decision
COMMERCIAL,
WYnwoter
Complete/Ready
PZ-19-3487-WA
35 NW 27TH ST
35 NW 27ST
HOTEL,
gewaer
T5
10/07/2019
Jacob Keirn
11/06/2019
02/20/2020
for Public
MULTIFAMILY
Hearing
RESIDENCE
TWO FAMILY
LITTLE
Yaremy
Final Decision
PZ-19-2957-WA
1701 Unlimited
1701SW 4AV
RESIDENCE
HAVANA
T3
09/20/2019
Vega
10/20/2019
12/27/2019
Complete/Ready
3187 HIBISCUS
TWO FAMILY
COCONUT
Final Decision
PZ-19-2977-WA
3187 Hibiscus demo
ST
RESIDENCE
GROVE
10J15/2019
Suhey Rojas
12J14J2019
12J18J2019
Complete/Ready
4180 douglas rd
SINGLE FAMILY
COCONUT
Kimberly
Final Decision
PZ-19-3008-WA
demo waiver
g180 SW 37 AV
RESIDENCE
GROVE
11J14/2019
Marcellus
12J14J2019
12J18J2019
Complete/Ready
Final Decision
PZ-19-0480-WA
ET
3540 PALMETTO
3540 PALMETTO
SINGLE FAMILY
Coconut
T3
10J30%2019
Georgina
11/29J2019
12%27J2019
-Complete/Ready
AVE - DEMO TOTAL
AV
RESIDENCE
Grove
DeCubas
for Public
New Apartment
Final Decision
PZ-19-2477-WA
Building at 1119 SW
1119 SW 6ST
MULTIFAMILY
LITTLE
T4
11/01/2019
Suhey Rojas
12/01/2019
01/15/2020
Complete/Ready
61hStreet
RESIDENCE
HAVANA
for Public
3138
Final Decision
PZ-19-4442-WA
31DCommodore-Waiveaiver
COMMODORE
OFFICE
Coconut
T5
10/16/2019
Jonathan
11/15/2019
01/16/2020
Complete/Ready
Demo W
D
PLZ
Grove
Thole
for Public
MULTIFAMILY
Final Decision
PZ-19-2716-WA
Modena Skylar
1445 NW 15AV
ALLAPATTAH
T6
12/10/2019
Suhey Rojas
01/09/2020
02/28/2020
RESIDENCE
Complete/Ready
Home Renovation
Final Decision
PZ-19-4616-WA
for Mr. Nico A.
3011 S MIAMI
SINGLE FAMILY
Coconut
T3
12 18J2019
J
y0111712020
Suhey Rojas
02J11/2020
Complete/Ready
Rouco
AV
RESIDENCE
Grove
for Public
1103 sw 22 terr
TWO FAMILY
LITTLE
Kimberly
Final Decision
PZ192588WA
rooftop access
1103 SW 22 TER
RESIDENCE
HAVANA
T3
12/12/2019
Marcellus
01/11/2020
02/26/2020
Complete/Ready
MULTIFAMILY
Jonathan
Final Decision
PZ-19-4888-WA
TRIPLEX -11
11NE51STREET
Little Haiti
11/25/2019
12/25/2019
02/29/2020
RESIDENCE
Thole
Complete/Ready
Residential
_
Final Decision
PZ-19-2045-WA
Addition/Renovatio
3000 CALUSA ST
SINGLE FAMILY
COCONUT12J19%2019
Suhey Rojas
01/18J2020
02%29J2020
Complete/Ready
n
RESIDENCE
GROVE
for Public
7325 BELLE
SINGLE FAMILY
UPPER
Kimberly
Final Decision
PZ-19-872-WA
7325 Belle Meade
MEADE BLVD
RESIDENCE
EASTSIDE
T3
01/14/2020
Marcellus
02/13/2020
03/02/2020
Complete/Ready
MULTIFAMILY
Final Decision
P7-19-2318-WT
Edision Place
610NW60ST
MODELCIiY
T6
01/07/2020
Jacob Keirn
02/06/2020
02/21/2020
RESIDENCE
Complete/Ready
Page
3 of 9
9/9/2021 12:07:02 PM
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report M
Appendices
Transact Date of First Plan Final Decision Final Decision
Waiver Number Project Name Address Use NETArea Zone Notice Reviewer cannot be issued (issuance)Date
prior to: and Posting Date
PZ-19-4220-WA GMoL- Garnica 2539 Lincoln SINGLE FAMILY Coconut 02/12/2020 Catalina 03/13/2020 03/13/2020
Martinez on Lincoln Avenue RESIDENCE Grove Torres
PZ-19-4299-WA 1151 1151NW40ST SINGLE FAMILY Model City T3 12/20/2019 Diana 01/19/2020 03/13/2020
RESIDENCE Agudelo
PZ-19-3396-WA Bora Apartments 550NW51AV MULTIFAMILY Flagami T6 01/17/2020 Yaremy 02/16/2020 03/26/2020
Fence Replacement RESIDENCE Vega
Joshua Schwartz SINGLE FAMILY Coconut Ya remy
PZ-19-3318-WA Renovation 2800 Kirk St T3 01/30/2020 02/29/2020 03/09/2020
Addition RESIDENCE Grove Vega
PZ-19-3777-WA 1836 Biscayne 1836 BISCAYNE MULTIFAMILY Wynwood/Ed T6 10/24/2019 Kimberly 11/23/2019 04/02/2020
BLVD RESIDENCE gewater Marcellus
1780 SINGLE FAMILY COCONUT Jonathan
PZ-19-2854-WA 1780 Ya ma LLC CHUCUNANTAH RESIDENCE GROVE T3 10/24/2019 Thole 11/23/2019 03/23/2020
RD
PZ-18-578-WA Private Residence 3310 ELIZABETH SINGLE FAMILY COCONUT T3 02/04/2020 Jonathan 03/05/2020 03/23/2020
ST RESIDENCE GROVE Thole
PZ-19-4540-WA 3230 Morris Ln 3230 MORRIS LN SINGLE FAMILY Coconut T3 10/04/2019 Georgina 11/03/2019 03/26/2020
RESIDENCE Grove DeCuhas
Platform 3750SDIXIE Coconut Catalina
PZ-19-5418-WA Demolition HWY OFFICE Grove TS 02/29/2020 Torres 03/30/2020 04/06/2020
PZ-19-3869-WA 2910 Emathla 2910 EMATHLA SINGLE FAMILY Coconut T3 08/28/2019 Yaremy 09/27/2019 04/06/2020
Street ST RESIDENCE Grove Vega
3323 Poinciana
3323 POINCIANA SINGLE FAMILY Coconut Georgina
PZ-19-5260-WA Demolition Permit T3 03/17/2020 04/16/2020 04/16/2020
AV RESIDENCE Grove DeCubas
Waiver _
2400 Overbrook 2400 SINGLE FAMILY Coconut Catalina
PZ-19-4837-WA Demolition OVERBROOKSf RESIDENCE Grove T3 03/11/2020 Torres 04/10/2020 04/14/2020
16300NAWAY SINGLE FAMILY Coconut Catalina
PZ-19-4997-WA Sonnier-tirado DR RESIDENCE Grove 03/16/2020 Torres 04/15/2020 04/15/2020
2551
PZ-19-705-WA Maximo GomezTres SOUTHWEST MULTIFAMILY AVTLE
RESIDENCE HANA
03/09/2020 SuheyRojas 04108/2020
ST.
PZ-19-5407-WA 3000 N Miami 3000 N Miami GENERAL Wynwood/Ed T4, TS 02/08/2020 Jonathan 03/09/2020
Remodeling Ave COMMERCIAL gewater Thole
PZ-19-3930-WA RIVIERE VILLA 1 750 NW NORTH MULTIFAMILY RIVER DR RESIDENCE Overtown T4 02/01/2020 Jacob Keirn 03102/2020
PZ-19-3400-WA CharlesAve 3523 CHARLES SINGLE FAMILY Coconut T3 03/09/2020 Kimberly 04/08f202O
Replacement Home AV RESIDENCE Grove Marcellus
Kumquat total 3720 KUMQUAT SINGLE FAMILY Coconut Diana
PZ-20-579&WA demolition AV RESIDENCE Grove 03/06/2020 Agudelo 04/05/2020
PZ-19AMULTIFAMILY Wynwood/Ed 763-WA 280 NW 28 Street 286 NW 29 ST RESIDENCE gewater T6 03/19/2020 Kimberly
Marcellus 04118f202O
PZ-19-5173-WA 3741 Kumquat 3741 KUMQUAT SINGLE FAMILY Coconut T3 03/13/2020 Diana 04/12/2020
Residence AV RESIDENCE Grove Agudelo
2221TIGERTAIL SINGLE FAMILY Coconut Diana
PZ-19-4694-WA BD16-007508-009 T3 01/19/2020 04/05/2020
AV RESIDENCE Grove Agudelo
SINGLE FAMILY Coconut Adrian
PZ-20-5662-WA 3609 Solana RD 3609 SOLANA RD RESIDENCE Grove T3 02/28/2020 Carrillo 05/03/2020
PZ-19-5506-WA Genesis 3675 S MIAMI RELIGIOUS Coconut Cl 05/08/2020 Catalina 06/07/2020
AV FACILITY Grove Torres
SHEPHERD ECO MULTIFAMILY Wynwood/Ed Kimberly
PZ-19-4653-WA MIXED USE 60 NE 27 ST T5 04/16/2020 05/16/2020
DEVELOPMENT RESIDENCE gewater Marcellus
PZ-79-3491-WA TOTAL DEMO 4161 POINCIANA SINGLE FAMILY Coconut 10/23/2079 Rafael 11/22/2019
AV RESIDENCE Grove Rodriguez
PZ-19-5422-WA Emathla Residence 2841 EMATHLA SINGLE FAMILY Coconut T3 05/07/2020 Catalina 06106/2020
ST RESIDENCE Grove Torres
PZ-19-3931-WA RIVIERE VILLA 710 NW NORTH MULTIFAMILY RIVER DR RESIDENCE Overtown T4 02/11/2020 Jacob Keirn 03/12/2020
3701 EL PRADO SINGLE FAMILY Coconut Adrian
PZ-19-5292-WA 3701 El Pmdo Blvd BLVD RESIDENCE Grove T3 04/15/2020 Carrillo 05115/2020
GENERAL
COMMERCIAL, Wynwood/Ed
PZ-19-4432-WA Wynwood 28 127 NW 27 ST MULTIFAMILY T5 02/04/2020 Jacob Keirn 03/05/2020
RESIDENCE, gewater
OFFICE
SINGLE FAMILY Coconut Diana
PZ-20-5975-WA 223 S. SHORE DR 223SSHORE DR RESIDENCE Grove T3 05/13/2020 Agudelo 06112/2020
Page 4 of 9
04/24/2020
04/23/2020
05/04/2020
04/28/2020
04/23/2020
04/30/2020
05/04/2020
05/07/2020
05/14/2020
06/11/2020
06/02/2020
06/11/2020
06/26/2020
06/16/2020
06/19/2020
06/25/2020
Application
Status
Final Decision
Complete/Ready
Waiting for
Batch Stamp
Final Decision
Complete/Ready
Final Decision
Complete/Ready
for Public
Final Decision
Complete/Ready
Final Decision
Complete/Ready
for Public
Final Decision
Complete/Ready
Final Decision
Complete/Ready
Final Decision
Complete/Ready
Final Decision
Complete/Ready
Final Decision
Complete/Ready
for Public
Final Decision
Complete/Ready
Final Decision
Complete/Ready
Final Decision
Complete/Ready
for Public
Waiting for
Batch Stamp
Final Decision
Complete/Ready
Final Decision
Complete/Ready
Final Decision
Complete/Ready
Final Decision
Complete/Ready
Final Decision
Complete/Ready
Final Decision
Complete/Ready
Final Decision
Complete/Ready
Final Decision
Complete/Ready
Final Decision
Complete/Ready
for Public
Final Decision
Complete/Ready
Final Decision
Complete/Ready
Waiting for
Batch Stamp
Final Decision
Complete/Ready
Waiting for
Batch Stamp
Final Decision
Complete/Ready
9/9/2021 12:07:02 PM
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report M
Appendices
Transact
Date of First
Plan
Final Decision
Final Decision
Application
Waiver Number
Project Name
Address
Use
NET Area
cannot be issued
(issuance)Date
Zone
Notice
Reviewer
priorto:
and Posting Date
Status
Grove Bay
Final Decision
PZ-20-5707-WA
Investment Grou P,
3385 PAN
SINGLE FAMILY
Coconut
CS
05/01/2020
Adrian
05/31/2020
07/01/2020
Complete/Ready
LLC
AMERICANDR
RESIDENCE
Grove
Carrillo
for Public
2187 NW 241h
STORAGE/DIST
Jonathan
Waitingfor
PZ-19-0289-WA
XMC Properties LLC
CT
RIBUUON
Alla pattah
D2
05/19/2020
Thole
06/18/2020
07/08/2020
Batch Stamp
FACILITY
SINGLE FAMILY
Rafael
Waitingfor
PZ-19-3589-WA
New Comruaion
1435 NW 685T
RESIDENCE
Model City
T3
OS/21/2020
Rodriguez
06/20/2020
07/28/2020
Batch Stamp
1446 New
MULTIFAMILY
LITTLE
Jonathan
Waitingfor
PZ-19-3195-WA
Multifamily Building
1446SW2ST
T5
05/22/2020
06/21/2020
07/01/2020
(11 Units)
RESIDENCE
HAVANA
Thole
Batch Stamp
2891 Seminole
SINGLE FAMILY
Coconut
Adrian
Final Decision
PZ-20-5794WA
Seminole Residence
04/30/2020
OS/30/2020
06%25/2020
Street
RESIDENCE
Grove
Carrillo
Complete/Ready
3675JUSTISON
SINGLE FAMILY
Coconut
Final Decision
PZ-19-3556-WA
3675
RD
RESIDENCE
Grove
T3
05/29/2020
Suhey Rojas
06/28/2020
07/09/2020
Complete/Ready
SINGLE FAMILY
Final Decision
PZ-19-5006-WA
RESIDENCE
2500 SWANSON
SINGLE FAMILY
Coconut
T3
06/10/2020
Catalina
07/10/2020
07/22/2020
Complete/Ready
ADDITION
AV
RESIDENCE
Grove
Torres
for Public
TWO FAMILY
Coconut
Diana
Diana
Final Decision
PZ-20�345-WA
3130 Plaza
3130 PLAZA ST
RESIDENCE
Grove
06/23/2020
07/23/2020
07/29/2020
Complete/Ready
25 BAY HEIGHTS
SINGLE FAMILY
Coconut
Diana
Waitingfor
PZ-20-7026-WA
25 BAY HEIGHTS
DR
RESIDENCE
Grove
06/17/2020
Agudelo
07/17/2020
07/24/2020
Batch Stamp
SINGLE FAMILY
South Federal
2900SMiami
RESIDENCE,
COCONUT
Waitingfor
PZ-19�31-WA
Highway Parcel
Avenue
TWO FAMILY
GROVE
, T3
12/02/20I9
Jacob Keirn
01/01/2020
07/24/2020
Batch Stamp
RESIDENCE
WAIVER 85 NE 55
MULTIFAMILY
Diana
Final Decision
PZ-20�227-WA
ENE SS ST
Uttle Ha iti
T4
06/]9/2020
07/J9/2020
09/25/2020
STMIAMI
RESIDENCE
_
Agudelo
Complete/Ready
1781 ESPANO LA
SINGLE FAMILY
Coconut
Georgina
Final Decision
PZ-20-6328-WA
Serrano
DR
RESIDENCE
Grove
06/17/2020
De Cubas
07/17/20ZD
07/22/2020
Complete/Ready
2526 LINCOLN
SINGLE FAMILY
Coconut
Georgina
Final Decision
PZ-20�OSFCWA
Philip Cassel
AV
RESIDENCE
Grove
06/12/2020
DeCubas
07/12/2020
07J28/2020
Complete/Ready
3893
Final Decision
PZ-20-6374-WA
DEMOLITION
WASH INGTON
SINGLE FAMILY
Coconut
T3
06/05/2020
Adrian
07/05/2020
09/09/2020
Complete/Ready
WASHIGTON AVE
AV
RESIDENCE
Grove
Carrillo
for Public
2810 SEMINOLE
SINGLE FAMILY
Coconut
Diana
Final Decision
PZ-19-5489-WA
Suarez Residence
OS/13/2020
06/12/2020
09/15/2020
ST
RESIDENCE
Grove
Agudelo
Complete/Ready
New Muhifafti
MULTIFAMILY
LITTLE
Final Decision
PZ-19-2621-WA
Building
120 NW 6AV
RESIDENCE
HAVANA
T6
05/30/2020
Suhey Rojas
06/29/2020
09/11/2020
Complete/Ready
5895WFLAGLER
MULTIFAMILY
Yaremy
Waitingfor
PZ-19-4666-WA
5895 Building
Flagami
T6
02/24/2020
03/25/2020
10/14/2020
ST
RESIDENCE
Vega
Batch Stamp
2508SWANSON
SINGLE FAMILY
Coconut
Yaremy
Final Decision
PZ-19-4554-WA
Ritter -Demolition
AV
RESIDENCE
Grove
T3
06/19/2020
Vega
07/19/2020
09/11/2020
Complete/Ready
Gross Residence-
SINGLE FAMILY
Coconut
Catalina
Waitingfor
PZ-20-6538-WA
Demolition Waiver
268 E SHORE DR
RESIDENCE
Grove
T3
07/07/2020
Torres
08/06/2020
09/08/2020
Batch Stamp
SINGLE FAMILY
Coconut
Diana
Final Decision
PZ-19-5336-WA
Casa 22
27805W 22 AV
04/29/2020
06/20/2020
09/08/2020
RESIDENCE
Grove
Agudelo
Complete/Ready
MULTIFAMILY
Diana
Waitingfor
PZ-19-5047-WA
11SW
11SW 59AV
Flagame
T6
05 21/
/
06/20/2020
10 14 2020
//2020
RESIDENCE
Agudelo
Batch Stamp
GENERAL
DOWNTOWN
Final Decision
COMMERCIAL,
BRICKELL
Sergio
Complete/Ready
PZ-18-284-WT
17t h St re et Tower
70NE17Street
MULTIFAMILY
(TEMPORARY
,T6
08/13/2019
Garrido
09/12/2019
08/14/2020
for Public
RESIDENCE,
ATOMNICRA
OFFICE
BUILDING)
Hearing
❑C DS Riverside
616SW 12th
RELIGIOUS
LITTLE
Denise
Final Decision
P7-18-432-EX
Meetinghouse
Avenue
FACILITY
HAVANA
, T5, T6
_
Toranm
Complete/Ready
Legacy at 19th
MULTIFAMILY
Kimberly
Final Decision
PZ-19-0963-WA
Street
1642 NW 195T
RESIDENCE
Allapattah
T6
07/09/2020
Marcellus
OS/08/20ZD
09/25/2020
Complete/Ready
3194 VIA
SINGLE FAMILY
Coconut
Catalina
Final Decision
PZ-20-7524-WA
Cohen Residence
ABITARE WAY
RESIDENCE
Grove
T3
07/23/2020
Torres
08/22/2020
09/25/2020
Complete/Ready
SINGLE FAMILY
Diana
l
FinaomplDecisete/Reaiondy
PZ-20-7194-WA
1619 SW 17 TER
1619 SW 17 TER
RESIDENCE
Little Havana
T3
08/19/2020
Agudelo
09/18/2020
11/03/2020
C
3040 CALUSA
SINGLE FAMILY
Coconut
Adrian
Final Decision
PZ-20-6524-WA
3040 CALUSA ST
T3
05/23/2020
08/22/2020
09/09/2020
RESIDENCE
RESIDENCE
Grove
Carrillo
Complete/Ready
2800 SHIPPING
SINGLE FAMILY
Coconut
Catalina
Final Decision
PZ-20-6238-WA
2800 SHIPPING AVE
AV
RESIDENCE
Grove
T3
07/31/2020
Torres
08/30/2020
09/25/2020
Complete/Ready
SINGLE FAMILY
Coconut
Yaremy
Final Decision
PZ-19-5504-WA
BD19023018001
4149SW42AV
RESIDENCE
Grove
T3
08/03/2020
Vega
09/02/2020
09/15/2020
Complete/Ready
Page 5 of 9 9/9/2021 12:07:02 PM
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report n
Appendices
Transact .Date of First Plan Final Decision Final Decision
NYaiver Number project Name Address Use NETArea cannot be issued (Issuance)Date
Zone Notice Reviewer cannot
and Posting Date
PZ-20-5962-WA 2290 Tequesta 2290 TEQUESTA SINGLE FAMILY Coconut 13 07/16/2020 Catalina 09/06/2020 09/25/2020
LN RESIDENCE Grove Torres
PI-19-4490-WA b344 West Hagler 6344 W FLAGLER. MULTIFAMILY Flagami IS 01123JI020 Suhey Rojas 08/22120ID 11/02/2020
ST RESIDENCE
Alice Wainwright 2651 BRICKELL RECEATIONAL Coconut Catalina
PZ-20-7467-WA Park AV FACILITY Grove Tl 08125/2020 Torres 09J24/2020 09/30J2020
P7-20-7752-WA 146 NW 36 Ct 146 NW 36 CT MULTIFAMILY Flagami T4 08/27/2020 Catalina 09/26/2020 11/03/2020
RESIDENCE Torres
Twin Homes at 1010 SW 22nd TWO FAMILY Jonathan
PZ-20-5683-WA 1010 SW 22nd St ST RESIDENCE Little Havana OS/73%2020 Thole 09/12/2020 11/30/2020
80 BAY HEIGHTS SINGLE FAMILY Coconut Adrian
P7-20-7390-WA 80 BAY HEIGHTS DR DR RESIDENCE Grove T3 08119/2020 Carrillo 09118/2020 09/30/2020
GENERAL
COMMERCIAL,
PZ-19-5507-WA
Flagler Oasis
1110 NW 1ST
Marlins Park T6
MULTIFAMILY
RESIDENCE
P7-20-6913-WA
Solar Luxe in the
3119 PLAZA ST
SINGLE FAMILY
Coconut
grove
RESIDENCE
Grove
Devco Everglades
PZ-20-7110-WA
General
7021 SW 8ST
GENERAL
Flagami DJ
Commercial
COMMERCIAL
PZ-20-8342-WA
2536 SWANSON
2536 SWANSON
SINGLE FAMILY
Coconut
13
AVENUE
AV
RESIDENCE
Grove
Land swap PRCC
2900 NW 5
GENERAL
WYNWOOD-
PZ-18-581-WA
& MDC offices
Avenue
COMMERCIAL
EDGEWATER
PZ-20-6548-WA
3630 PALMETTO AV
3630 PALMETTO
SINGLE FAMILY
Coconut
13
-WAIVER
AV
RESIDENCE
Grove
3561 Charles Ave
3561 CHARLES
SINGLE FAMILY
Coconut
PZ-20-6302-WA
Fence Waiver
AV
RESIDENCE
T3
Grove
SINGLE FAMILY
Upper
PZ-20-6718-WA
Pool Permit
1200 NE 81 TER
RESIDENCE
T3
Eastside
P7-20-8063-WA
Noble Residence
3987 EL PRADO
SINGLE FAMILY
Coconut T3
BLVD
RESIDENCE
Grove
TWO, FAMILY
COCONUT
P7-19-896-WA
3075 marystreet
3075 maryst
T3
RESIDENCE
GROVE
GENERAL
P7-20-6764-WA
Bel Invest ParcelA
161 NW 28 ST
COMMERCIAL,
Wynwood/Ed T5
MULTIFAMILY
gewater
RESIDENCE
MULTIFAMILY
PZ-19-3040-WA
DUPLEX3345
3345 SW 22 TER
RESIDENCE
CORALWAY T4
PZ-19-4398-WA
3140 carter st
3140 CARTER ST
SINGLE FAMILY
Coconut
13
demolition
RESIDENCE
Grove
New winning pool
PZ-20-7102-WA
and spa for CNCP
1721S
SINGLE FAMILY
Coconut
13
LLC
RAYSHORE LN
RESIDENCE
Grove
PZ-20-7193-WA
3200 Kirk St
3200 Kirk St
SINGLE FAMILY
Coconut 13
RESIDENCE
Grove
PZ-20-7430-WA
3028 Sh ipping Ave-
3028 Shipping
SINGLE FAMILY
Coconut
TH
Avenue
RESIDENCE
Grove
2400 & 2500 N
2400 N MIAMI
MULTIFAMILY
Wynwood/Ed
PZ-20-5569-WA
Miami Ave
AV
RESIDENCE
T6
gewater
ter
P7-20-6534-WA
Dous
335 NW 285T
HOTEL
Wynwood/Ed T5
gewater
P1-20-b8b0-WA
1620 Residential
TWO NW 18SI
MULTIFAMILY
Allapattah Ib
RESIDENCE
PZ-20-6421-WA
NEW SINGLE
3823THOMAS
SINGLE FAMILY
Coconut
13
FAMILY RESIDENCE
AV
RESIDENCE
Grove
Villas Of
MULTIFAMILY
PZ-20-5722-WA
Shenandoah
717 SW 11 AV
RESIDENCE
Little Havana T5
New Apartment
MULTIFAMILY
PZ-19-5419-WA
Building
1853SW7ST
RESIDENCE
Little Havana T4
PZ-20-7874-WA
3591 STEWART AVE
35915TEWART
SINGLE FAMILY
Coconut T3
AV
RESIDENCE
Grove
PZ-20-7047-WA
demo 2345 waiver
2345 TEQUESTA
SINGLE FAMILY
Coconut
13
W
RESIDENCE
Grove
Michael &
SINGLE FAMILY
Coconut
PZ-20-7244-WA
Christine Forrest
4140 HARDIE AV
RESIDENCE
13
Grove
Page 6 of 9
06/23/2020 Yaremy
Vega
08/31/2020 Catalina
Torres
08J28/2020 Jonathan
Thole
Kimberly
09/28/2020
Marcellus
08/28/2020 Yaremy
Vega
09J20/2020 Georgina
De Cubas
08/27/2020 Georgina
De Cubas
09/18/2020 Yaremy
Vega
10J01/2020 Georgina
De Cubas
08J05/2020 Suhey Rojas
07J23/2020 10/21J2020
09/30/2020 11/02/2020
09/27/2020 10/22/2020
10/28/2020
11/02/2020
10/22/2020
10/29/2020
10J20/2020
11/03J2020
10/26/2020
11/30/2020
10/18/2020
11/16/2020
10J31/2020
11/03J2020
10J28/2020
11103f202O
02/26/2020 Jacob Keirn 03/27/2020 11/10/2020
09/28/2020 Yaremy
Vega
10/05/2020 Kimberly
Marcellus
09/02/2020 Catalina
Torres
08/31/2020 Paul Brown
08/05/2020 Paul Brown
Kimberly
09/29%2020
Marcellus
10/02/2020 Jonathan
Thole
10/1b/2020 Yaremy
Vega
10/19/2020 Catalina
Torres
Catalina
09/21/2020
Torres
06/5/2020 Catalina
Torres
11/12/2020 Georgina
De Cubas
Diana
09/14/2020 Agudelo
11/14/2020 Diana
Agudelo
11/09/2020
12/08/2020
11/04/2020
12/07/2020
10/30/2020
11/10/2020
09/30/2020
09/04/2020
10/29/2020
11J01/2020
11/15/20ID
12/06/2020
10/21/2020
071 5/2020
12/12/2020
10/14/2020
12/14/2020
11/29/2020
12/0112020
11/16/2020
12/03/2020
12/10/2020
12/11/2020
12/14/2020
12/21/2020
12/14/2020
12/16/2020
Application
Status.
Final Decision
Complete/Ready
Waitingfor
Batch Stamp
Final Decision
Complete/Ready
Waitingfor
Batch Stamp
Final Decision
Complete/Ready
Final Decision
Complete/Ready
Final Decision
Complete/Ready
for Public
Hearing
Waitingfor
Batch Stamp
Waitingfor
Batch Stamp
Final Decision
Complete/Ready
Final Decision
Complete/Ready
Final Decision
Complete/Ready
Final Decision
Complete/Ready
Waitingfor
Batch Stamp
Final Decision
Complete/Ready
Waitingfor
Batch Stamp
Waitingfor
Batch Stamp
Final Decision
Complete/Ready
Waitingfor
Batch Stamp
Waitingfor
Batch Stamp
Approved for
Administrative
Pending ZA/PD
Approval
Waitingfor
Batch Stamp
Waitingfor
Batch Stamp
Waitingfor
Batch Stamp
Waitingfor
Batch Stamp
Waitingfor
Batch Stamp
Final Decision
Complete/Ready
Final Decision
Complete/Ready
Waitingfor
Batch Stamp
Waitingfor
Batch Stamp
9/9/2021 12:07:02 PM
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report M
Appendices
Transect
Date of First
plan
Final Decision
Final Decision
Application
Waiver Number
Project Name
Address
Use
NETArea
cannot be issued
(issuance)Date
Zone
Notice
Reviewer
priorto:
and Posting Date
Status
Caroline Peyre
3809 IRVINGTON
SINGLE FAMILY
Coconut
Yaremy
Final Decision
PZ-20�321-WA
residence
AV
RESIDENCE
Grove
10/09/L020
Vega
11/OS/2020
12/16/2020
Complete/Ready
NEW SINGLE
3787THOMAS
SINGLE FAMILY
Coconut
Waitingfor
PZ-20-6322-WA
10/07/2020
Suhey Rojas
12/06/2020
12/18/2020
FAMILY RESIDENCE
AV
RESIDENCE
Grove
Batch Stamp
3090 Hibiscus
3090 HIBISCUS
TWO FAMILY
Coconut
Catalina
Final Decision
PZ-20-6220-WA
Street
ST
RESIDENCE
Grove
T3
10/02/2020
Torres
11/01/2020
01/15/2021
Complete/Ready
Maslowski/Nava s
SINGLE FAMILY
Coconut
Georgina
Waitingfor
PZ-20-6631-WA
Residence
3817 SW 42 AV
RESIDENCE
Grove
T3
11/11/2020
DeCubas
01/02/2021
01/29/2021
Batch Stamp
MAYFAIR HOTEL
3000 FLORIDA
Coconut
Final Decision
PZ-20-7759-WA
AND SPA
AVENUE
HOTEL
Grove
10/08/2020
Paul Brown
11/07/2020
12/21/2020
Complete/Ready
MULTIFAMILY
Final Decision
PZ-20-6331-WA
Pasco Urbano 16
3702 NW 23AV
RESIDENCE
Allapattah
IS
11/16/2020
Suhey Rojas
12/16/2020
01/06/2021
Complete/Ready
3975 LITTLE
SINGLE FAMILY
Coconut
Final Decision
PZ-20-8814-WA
3975 LITTLE AVE LLC
T3
12/17/2020
Suhey Rojas
Ol/22/2021
02/09/2021
AVENUE
RESIDENCE
Grove
Complete/Ready
1921S Baysho re
1921S
MIDDLE/HIGH
Coconut
Final Decision
PZ-20-8068-WA
DEMO
BAYSHORE DR
SCHOOL
Grove
T3
10/15/2020
PaulBrown
11/14/2020
01/11/2021
Complete/Ready
GENERAL
Downtown-
Fina (Decision
Riverside
COMMERCIAL,
Brickell
Complete/Ready
PZ-19h252-WA
230SW3ST
MULTIFAMILY
(Temporary
T6
07/2012020
Jacob Keirn
08/19/2020
02/05/2021
Development
RESIDENCE,
atOMNICRA
for Public
Hearing
OFFICE
Building)
SINGLE FAMILY
Diana
Waitingfor
PZ-20-9598-WA
Setback Waiver
515 NW 57 CT
RESIDENCE
Flagami
T3
12/11/2020
Agudelo
01/10/2021
01/26/2021
Batch Stamp
New swimming
SINGLE FAMILY
Coconut
Final Decision
PZ-20-7618-WA
pool
223 S SHORE DR
RESIDENCE
Grove
T3
12/09/2020
Suhey Rojas
01/17/2021
02/10/2021
Complete/Ready
237NE24th
PUBLIC
Wynwood/Ed
Adrian
Approved for
PZ-19-5528-WA
Parking Lot
Street
PARKING
gewater
10/23/2020
Carrillo
12/01/2020
03/19/2021
Administrative
2300 TEQUESTA
SINGLE FAMILY
Coconut
Georgina
Waitingfor
PZ-20�963-WA
Carl Ed lund
LN
RESIDENCE
Grove
12/09/2020
DeCubas
Ol/OS/2021
03/17/2021
Batch Stamp
3650 Battersea
SINGLE FAMILY
Coconut
Diana
Waitingfor
PZ-20-8084-WA
Taha Residence
Rd
RESIDENCE
Grove
T3
10/26/2020
Agudelo
11/25/2020
03/02/2021
Batch Stamp
Demolition Waiver
SINGLE FAMILY
Coconut
Jonathan
Waitingfor
PZ-20-8655-WA
fornew balcony
4129 HARDIE AV
T3
12/05/2020
01/04/2021
03/05/2021
and pool
RESIDENCE
Grove
Thole
Batch Stamp
MARKALHADEFF
AUTO -RELATED
Diana
Waitingfor
PZ-20-7298-WA
1880NW23ST
INDUSTRIAL
Allapattah
Dl
01/11/2021
02/10/2021
04/01/2021
IRS
ESTA B.
Agudelo
Batch Stamp
3570 Battersea
3570 BATTERSEA
SINGLE FAMILY
Coconut
Diana
Waitingfor
PZ-20�723-WA
Road
RD
RESIDENCE
Grove
12/JS/2020
Agudelo
01/14/2021
03/04/2021
Batch Stamp
GENERAL
Wynwood 29 East-
COMMERCIAL,
Wynwood/Ed
Jonathan
Waitingfor
PZ-20-564b-WA
quarters
51 NW 285T
MULTIFAMILY
gewater
TS
06/16/2020
Thole
07/16/2020
03/OS/2021
Batch Stamp
RESIDENCE
GENERAL
2900 BISCAYNE
COMMERCIAL,
Wynwood/Ed
Waitingfor
PZ-19-5269-WA
2900 Biscayne
T6
11/20/2020
Jacob Kenn
12/20/2020
03/17/2021
BLVD
MULTIFAMILY
gewater
Batch Stamp
RESIDENCE
PZ-20{189-WA
Driveway repairand
17455W 11 TER
SINGLE FAMILY
Coral Way
T3
12/22/2020
Jonathan
01/21/2021
03/19/2021
Waitingfor
remodel
RESIDENCE
Thole
Batch Stamp
GENERAL
1825-1837 NE 4
COMMERCIAL,
Wynwood/Ed
Jonathan
Waitingfor
PZ-20-5736-WA
Avenue
1825 NE 4AV
MULTIFAMILY
gewater
T6
09/03/2020
Thole
10/03/2020
03/OS/2021
Batch Stamp
_
RESIDENCE
SINGLE FAMILY
Catalina
Waitingfor
PZ-20-6986-WA
1225 Sw 10 St
12255W 10 ST
RESIDENCE
Little Havana
T3
01/12/2021
Torres
02/11/2021
03/19/2021
Batch Stamp
DEMO WAIVER
26 BAY HEIGHTS
SINGLE FAMILY
Coconut
Yaremy
Waitingfor
PZ-20-7547-WA
DEMO WAIVER
DR
RESIDENCE
Grove
T3
01/21/2021
Vega
02/20/2021
04/13/2021
Batch Stamp
3130 EMATHLA
SINGLE FAMILY
Coconut
Yaremy
Waitingfor
PZ-20-9058-WA
3130 Emath la St.
ST
RESIDENCE
Grove
02/16/2021
Vega
04/10/2021
OS/10/2021
Batch Stamp
2440 SECOFFEE
SINGLE FAMILY
Coconut
Kimberly
Final Decision
PZ-20-9032-WA
2440 Secoffee Ter.
TER
RESIDENCE
Grove
T3
01/22/2021
Marcell-
02/21/2021
Complete/Ready
GENERAL
Wynwood/Ed
Yaremy
Waitingfor
PZ-20-7974-WA
167 NE 39 Street
167 NE 39 ST
COMMERCIAL
gewater
T6
02/12/2021
Vega
03/14/2021
03/17/2021
Batch Stamp
SINGLE FAMILY
Approved for
PZ-20-5837-WA
Infill
7724 NW 3AV
RESIDENCE
Little Haiti
T3
02/09/2021
Paul Brown
03/11/2021
03/18/2021
Administrative
1861 TIGERTAIL
SINGLE FAMILY
Coconut
Georgina
Waitingfor
PZ-19h948-WA
Owens project
AV
RESIDENCE
Grove
11/18%2020
DeCubas
03/18/2021
05/28/2021
Batch Stamp
Page 7 of 9 9/9/2021 12:07:02 PM
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report M
Appendices
Waiver Number Project Name
Address Use
NETArea Transecr
Date of First
Zone
Notice
Downtown -
HOTEL,
Brickell
PZ-19-5483-WA The District
225NMIAMIAV MULTIFAMILY
(Temporary T6
11/09/2020
RESIDENCE
atOMNICRA
Building)
3260 MATILDA
Plan
Final Decision Final Decision
not be issued (Issuance) Date Application
Reviewer can Status
prior to: end Posting Date
Yaremy Wait ing for
12/09/2020 04/09/2021
Vega Batch Stamp
3260 MATILDA
SINGLE FAMILY
Coconut
Yaremy
PZ-20-8102-WA
STREET
ST
RESIDENCE
Grove
03/09/2021
Vega
04/09/2021
DEMOLITION
old driveway
1775 NO -CA -TEE
SINGLE FAMILY
Coconut
Adrian
PZ-20-8866-WA
removal
DR
RESIDENCE
Grove
T3
01/27/2021
Carrillo
02/26/2021
03/23/2021
3601 Oak Ave
3601Oak
SINGLE FAMILY
Coconut
Jonathan
PZ-20-9123-WA
,
Demo Waiver
Avenue
RESIDENCE
Grove
02/23%2021
Thole
03/25/2021
04/14/2021
3301 MCDONALD
3301
SINGLE FAMILY
Coconut
Georgina
PZ-20-8559-WA
STREETLLC
MCDONALDST
RESIDENCE
Grove
T3
02,04,202,
DeCubas
03/11/2021
04/15/2021
SINGLE FAMILY
Yaremy
PZ-20-6241-WA
217 NW 19th
217 NW 19th AV
RESIDENCE
Marlins Park
03/16/2021
Vega
04/15/2021
04/16/2021
4005 ELPRADO
SINGLE FAMILY
Coconut
Georgina
PZ-20-9533-WA
Fellig House
BLVD
RESIDENCE
Grove
T3
01/26/2021
DeCubas
04/24/2021
SINGLE FAMILY
Kimberly
PZ-19-3857-WA
29285W 215i
29285W 215T
RESIDENCE
Coral Way
T3
02/05%2020
Marcellus
03/06/2020
1798 ESPANOLA
SINGLE FAMILY
Coconut
Adrian
PZ-20-6275-WA
1798
T3
01/27/2021
04/08/2021
04/28/2021
DR
RESIDENCE
Grove
Carrillo
GENERAL
2804-2838 NW 1
COMMERCIAL,
Wynwood/Ed
Hellena
PZ-20-5640-WT
Ave
2804NW lAV
MULTIFAMILY
gewater
T5, T6
09/02/2020
Lahens
10/02/2020
OS/OS/2021
RESIDENCE
TWO FAMILY
Jonathani
PZ-20-9462-WA
Multi Family
929 SW 29 CT
Coral Way
T4
03/15/2021
04/14/2021
RESIDENCE
Thole
SINGLE FAMILY
Coconut
Georgina
PZ-21-9944-WA
The Warren
3370 ROYALRD
RESIDENCE
Grove
T3
03/26/2021
DeCubas
05/13/2021
14th Allapattah
MULTIFAMILY
Yaremy
PZ-20-7576-WA
Building
1455 NW 35 ST
RESIDENCE
Allapattah
TS
02/19/2021
Vega
03/21/2021
OS/11/2021
4040 MATHESON
4040 MATHESON
SINGLE FAMILY
Coconut
Georgina
PZ-20�437-WA
AVE
AV
RESIDENCE
Grove
T3
04/07%2021
DeCubas
05/07/2021
05%26/2021
PZ-19-4871-WA
Andale Group LLC
3710 GRAND AV
OFFICE
Coconut
T5
01/12/2021
Georgina
02/11/2021
05/11/2021
Grove
De Cubas
2320 SWANSON
SINGLE FAMILY
Coconut
Georgina
PZ-20-920&WA
Private Residence
AV
RESIDENCE
G-ve
04/13%2021
DeCubas
05/13/2021
05/26/2021
2467 Bayshore
2467S
SINGLE FAMILY
Coconut
Georgina
PZ 20
9785 WA
Drive Residence
BAYSHORE DR
RESIDENCE
Grove
T3
03/30/2021
DeCubas
05/15/2021
05/26/2021
MULTIFAMILY
PZ-20-6046-WA
753 NW 30 ST
753 NW 30ST
Allapattah
T4
10/28/2020
Paul Brown
11/27/2020
06/08/2021
RESIDENCE
GENERAL
Yaremy
PZ-20-6845-WA
1591h Street
159 NE 54 street
Little Haiti
03/30/2021
04/29/2021
06/02/2021
COMMERCIAL
Vega
PZ-20-8021-WA
Demolition
3100JEFFERSON
SINGLE FAMILY
Coconut
T3
12/04/2020
Paul Brown
01/03/2021
06/04/2021
_
ST
RESIDENCE
Grove
3440 Oak Avenue
SINGLE FAMILY
Coconut
Georgina
PZ-20-8528-WA
Demolition Permit
3440 OAKAV
RESIDENCE
Grove
T3
04/09/2021
DeCubas
05/09/2021
05/24/2021
1855S BAYSHO RE
1855S
SINGLE FAMILY
Coconut
Catalina
PZ-21-9897-WA
T3
03/03/2021
05/30/2021
DR
BAYSHORE DR
RESIDENCE
Grove
Torres
PZ-20-7569-WA
Gandon Waiver
3623 CHARLES
SINGLE FAMILY
Coconut
12/10%2020
Adrian
0S/13/2021
06/08/2021
AV
RESIDENCE
Grove
Carrillo
Downtown-
Brickell
PZ-20-7489-WA
andrew mirmelli
BOOS
SINGLE FAMILY
(Temporary
T3
12/09/2020
Diana
01/08/2021
VENETIAN WAY
RESIDENCE
at OMNI CRA
Agudelo
Building)
South Bayshore
1788S
SINGLE FAMILY
Coconut
PZ-20-7179-WA
T3
03/23/2021
Suhey Rojas
04/22/2021
06/14/2021
Residence
BAYSHORE UN
RESIDENCE
Grove
PZ-20-9691-WA
KEVAL PATELSEEMA
3100 MUNROE
SINGLE FAMILY
Coconut
T3
OS/OS/2021
Catalina
06/04/2021
RESIDENCE
DR
RESIDENCE
Grove
Torres
GENERAL
PZ-20-7380-WA
Animal Clinic
2626SW18ST
Cora IWay
T6
05/14/2021
PaulBrown
06/13/2021
COMMERCIAL
L2 Holdings Miami
Yaremy
PZ-20-9833-WA
Pa rkin g
1790SW22ST
OFFICE
Cora IWay
T5
03/18/2021
Vega
04/17/2021
SINGLE FAMILY
Coconut
Catalina
PZ-21-10318-WA
Kujawa Residence
3350 DEVON RD
RESIDENCE
Grove
T3
05/25/2021
Torres
06/24/2021
Page 8 of 9
Final Decision
Complete/Ready
for Public
Approved for
Administrative
Final Decision
Complete/Ready
Final Decision
Complete/Ready
Final Decision
Complete/Ready
Final Decision
Complete/Ready
Pending ZA/PD
Approval
Final Decision
Complete/Ready
Final Decision
Complete/Ready
for Public
Hearing
Final Decision
Complete/Ready
Pending ZA/PD
Approval
Wait ing for
Batch Stamp
Waiting for
Batch Stamp
Waiting for
Batch Stamp
Waiting for
Batch Stamp
Wait ing for
Batch Stamp
Approved for
Administrative
Waiting for
Batch Stamp
Approved for
Administrative
Final Decision
Complete/Ready
Final Decision
Complete/Ready
Approved for
Administrative
Final Decision
Complete/Ready
for Public
Hearing
Waiting for
Batch Stamp
Final Decision
Complete/Ready
for Public
Final Decision
Complete/Ready
Pending ZA/PD
Approval
Final Decision
Complete/Ready
9/9/2021 12:07:02 PM
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report M
Appendices
Transect
Date of First
Plan
Final Decision
Final Decision
Application
waiver Number
Project Name
Address
Use
NETArea
cannot be issued
(Issuance) Date
Zone
Notice
Reviewer
priorto:
and Posting Date
Status
Final Decision
PZ-21-10260-WA
2201Tequesta
2201Tequesta
SINGLE FAMILY
Coconut
T3
OS/D/2021
Georgina
06/26/2021.
Complete/Ready
Interior Remodeling
Way
RESIDENCE
Grove
DeCubas
for Public
TWO FAMILY
LITTLE
Kimberly
Final Decision
PZ-19-2487-WA
Tanin Villas 1381
1381 SW 22 TER
RESIDENCE
HAVANA
T3
05/24/2021
Marcellus
06/23/2021
Complete/Ready
TWO FAMILY
Coconut
Kimberly
Final Decision
PZ-21-10511-WA
3633Day ave
3633DAY AV
RESIDENCE
Grove
T3
05/25/2021
Marcellus
07/09/2021
Complete/Ready
Dalmazzo
2801SEMINOLE
SINGLE FAMILY
Coconut
Approved for
PZ�0-5753-WA
Residence
ST
RESIDENCE
Grove
03/23/2021
Paul Brown
04/22/2021
OS/30/2021
Administrative
3571 FAIR ISLE
SINGLE FAMILY
Coconut
Adrian
Final Decision
PZ-19-5340-WA
Single House
ST
RESIDENCE
Grove
T3
05/24/2021
Carrillo
06/24/2021
Complete/Ready
SINGLE FAMILY
Coconut
Catalina
Final Decision
P7-21-10071-WA
JUNGLES
3310 DEVON CT
T3
06/01/2021
07/01/2021
RESIDENCE
Grove
Torres
Complete/Ready
Rhyner Front
3039 AVIATION
SINGLE FAMILY
Coconut
Diana
Final Decision
PZ-20-8196-WA
Addition
AV
RESIDENCE
Grove
12/OS/2020
Agudelo
Ol/07/2021
Complete/Ready
3560 CRYSTAL
SINGLE FAMILY
Coconut
Adrian
Final Decision
PZ-21-9948-WA
Crystal View
VIEW CT
RESIDENCE
Grove
T3
05/12/2021
Carrillo
06/11/2021
Complete/Ready
Final Decision
PZ-20-7780-WA
Miami River
1515 NW SOUTH
MULTIFAMILY
Marlins Park
T4
04/26/2021
Catalina
OS/26/2021
Complete/Ready
Towhomes
RIVER DR
RESIDENCE
Torres
for Public
Additions/
2517 ANDROS
SINGLE FAMILY
Coconut
Georgina
Final Decision
PZ-20-8246-WA
Remodeling
AV
RESIDENCE
Grove
T3
05/17/2021
DeCubas
07/14/2021
Complete/Ready
640 ne51 st
SINGLE FAMILY
Upper
Adrian
Final Decision
PI-20-8364-WA
driveway
640NE51ST
RESIDENCE
Eastside
T3
06/08/2021
Carrillo
07/08/2021
Complete/Ready
1820 Espanola
SINGLE FAMILY
Coconut
Adrian
Final Decision
PZ-21-10380-WA
David Resnick
Drive
RESIDENCE
Grove
OS/20/2021
Carrillo
07/23/2021
Complete/Ready
1601SW32
MULTIFAMILY
Kimberly
Final Decision
PZ-20-6605-WA
1601 Coral Gate
Avenue
RESIDENCE
Coral Way
12/04/2020
Marcellus
07/23/2021
Complete/Ready
naDecision
l
Kitchen Remodeling
PZ-20-6418-WA
for: Leafy Way
3970 LEAFY WAY
SINGLE FAMILY
Coconut
06/07/2021
Catalina
07/07/2021
CoFimplete/Ready
Residence
RESIDENCE
Grove
Torres
for Public
Hearing
HEROLDS
SINGLE FAMILY
Coconut
Diana
Final Decision
P7-21-10293-WA
3939 HARDIE AV
T3
06/10/2021
08/27/2021
08/30/2021
RESIDENCE
RESIDENCE
Grove
Agudelo
Complete/Ready
MULTIFAMILY
Wynwood/Ed
Kimberly
Final Decision
PZ-20-8928-WA
403 RESIDENCE
403 NW 35 ST
RESIDENCE
gewater
T4
12/14/2020
Marcellus
01/13/2021
Complete/Ready
2538 LINCOLN
SINGLE FAMILY
Coconut
Diana
Final Decision
PZ-20-9054-WA
demolition waiver
AV
RESIDENCE
Grove
T3
05/03/2021
Agudelo
06/02/2021
Complete/Ready
69 NW 53
MULTIFAMILY
Final Decision
PZ-19-4714-WA
69 NW 53 ST
Little Haiti
T4
05/20/2021
Suhey Rojas.
06/19/2021
Apartments
RESIDENCE
Complete/Ready
ALCOHOL
Bodega Taqueria y
Coconut
Rafael
PZ-21-10759-WA
Tequila
3419 MAIN HWY'
BEVERAGE
Grove
TS
07/30/2021
Rodriguez
08/29/2021
In Review
SERVICE ESTAR_
BED &
Final Decision
BREAKFAST,
Wynwood/Ed
Jonathan
Complete/Ready
PZ-19-3890-WA
Paraiso Place
452NE31ST
MULTIFAMILY
gewater
T6
04/26/2021
Thole
05/26/2021
for Public
RESIDENCE
Hearing
5040 N MIAMI
MULTIFAMILY
Kimberly
Waiting for
PZ-21-10007-WA
5040 rowhomes
AV
RESIDENCE
Little Haiti
T4
06/30/2021
Marcellus
07/30/2021
08/30/2021
Batch Stamp
Little Haiti
6601 NE MIAMI
MULTIFAMILY
Final Decision
PZ-20-6175-WA
Townhouses
PIE
RESIDENCE
Little Haiti
T4
07/02/2021
Paul Brown
08/01/2021
09/01/2021
Complete/Ready
Vizcaya Museum
for
PZ-21-10156-WA
and Gardens
3251S. Miami
COMMUNITY
Coconut
07/15/2021
GeorginaApproved
08/14/2021
09/02/2021
Administrative
Master Plan Phase
Avenue
FACILITY
Grove
DeCubas
Permit
1A
Flynn -Corbin
3331WILLIAM
SINGLE FAMILY
Coconut
Yaremy
Waiting for
PZ-21-10479-WA
Addition
AV
RESIDENCE
Grove
T3
07/19/2021
Vega
08/18/2021
09/03/2021
Batch Stamp
Page 9 of 9 9/9/2021 12:07:02 PM
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report W
Appendices
APPENDIX F. INFORMATION RELATING TO
LEED CERTIFICATION
Projects qualifying for LEED certification based on the scope of work: New Construction
and Total Addition SQFT (>50,000).
Permit Information
Work items Information
Penni[
Issuetl
New Addition
#of
LEED
No.
Permit Number
S[atus
Date
Address I
Total Cost
Work Item
SQFT
Floors
Height
Units
Certification
Permit
Status: Active
1
BD19016761001B001
Active
8/10/2021
GARDEN RD
$38,000, 000.00 MULTI-FAMILY(RENTAL)
392575
8
69
240
2
BD17011620001B001
Active
422/2019
SUNNYBROOK RID
$11,250, 000.00 STOPAGE & WAREHOUSING
112500
8
96
0
3
BDI9018232001B001
Active
5/l/2020
1040 SW 29 CT
$20,259, 668.00 MULTI -FAMILY (RENTAL)I
128031
9
78
139
COMMUNITY FACILITY
4
BD18018340001 B001
ACOV1
10/30/2019
11 SE 10 ST
$45,948,329.00 26 OR MORE LODGING UNITS
160000
19
253
252 x
5
BD18006358001 B001
Active
221/2020
1109 SW 4 AV
$17,453, 000.00 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
110353
4
51
"0
MULTI -FAMILY (RENTAL)I
6
BD20004932001B001
Active
4/l/2021
1110 NW 1 ST
$11,200, 000.00 GENERALOFFICEI GENERAL
63464
10
126
100
RETAIL
7
BD18003273001 B001
Active
3/6/2020
1129 SW 3 AV
$50,281 525.00 26 OR MORE LODGING UNITS
287323
30
12
353 x
OTHER RETAILI BAR /TAVERN (50
8
BD19001285001B001
Active
822/2019
115 SW 8ST
$46174, 62500 OR MORE OCCUPANTS)I 26 OR
263855
24
275
264
MORE LODGING UNITS
9
BD15009792001B001
Active
1/17/2019
1265 SW 22 ST
$19,800, 000.00 26 OR MORE LODGING UNITS
171305
10
108
144
OTHER RETAI LI PROFESSIONAL
10
BDI9026047001B001
Active
6/11/2021
127 NW 27 ST
$25,650, 000. 00 OFFICE/ BANK I FINANCIAL
89905
4
40
40
INSTITUTIONI MULTIFAMILY
RENTAL)
11
BDI9025992001B001
Active
5/10/2021
129 NW 26 ST
$20,450, 000.00 OTHER RETAILI MULTIFAMILY109000
5
72
112
RENTAL)
12
BDI9015718001B001
Active
8/19/2021
1396 NW 36 ST
$51,78537500 MULTI-FAMILY(RENTAL)
295905
13
124
267
13
BDI9021109001B001
Active
524/2021
1445 NW 14 TER
$18,339, 85500 MULTI -FAMILY (RENTAL)
125769�
10
1
97
26 OR MORE LODGING UNITSI
14
BDI5001511001B001
Active
12/11/2015
145 SW 11 ST
$32,500, 000.00 RESTAURANT (50 OR MORE
199585
20
295:
230' x
OCCUPANTS)I BAR/TAVERN
-
(LESS THAN 50 OCCUPANTS)
15
BDI8004920001B001
Active
6/3/2020
150 NE 8 ST
$23,661,400.00 OTHER RETAIL
94940
3
32
0- x
16
BDI9001787001B001
Active
10/21/2020
1500 NW 62 ST
$9,282,526.00 OTHER RETAILI MULTIFAMILY53043
5
75
60
RENTAL)
17
BDI9001768001B001
Active
10/21/2020
1501 NW 62 ST
$15,98577500 MULTI-FAMILY(RENTAL)
91353
7
85
60
18
BD 18 005569001 BOO
Active
12/21/2018
1611 NW 12 AV
$127,000, 000. 00 HOSPITAL
261424
10
72
0
19
BD20009254001 B001
Active
6/1/2021
1630 NW 19 ST
$14,000, 000.00 MULTI-FAMILY(RENTAL)
93850
7
73
80
20
BDI8018345001B001
Active
9/10/2021
175 OF 25 RD
$72,250, 000.00 MULTI-FAMILY(CONDO)
289000
47
470
135
21
BD18011849001B001
Active
3/3/2020
1931 SW 3 AV
$14,348950.00 26 OR MORE LODGING UNITS
81994
8
88
141 x
22
BDI8012502001B001
Active
1/8/2020
2100 SW 8 ST
$38,842, 000.00 OTHER RETAILI MULTIFAMILY187356
9
101
224 x
RENTAL)
23
BD20026199001B001
Active
7/9/2021
2137 NW 35 ST
$21,349, 000.00 MULTI-FAMILY(RENTAL)
122333
8
85
105
1RSONBAYSHORE
OTHER RETAILI MULTI -FAMILY
24
BD18015192001 B001
Active
3/19/2020
$72,000,000.00
CONDO)
517000
28
28
296 x
25
BD190N2793001B001
ACtve
921/2020
218 NW 8ST
$58,000,000.00 OTHER RETAILI MULTIFAMILY396564
(RENTAL)
19
204
360
OTHER RETAI LI PROFESSIONAL
26
BD18018279001B001
Active
921/2020
2201 NMIAMI AV
$67,500, 000. 00 ORR CE/BANG /FINANCIAL
276551
8
60
257 x
NSTITUTI ONI MULTIFAMILY
RENTAL)
RESTAURANT (LESS THAN 50
27
BD17016364001B001
Active
9/18/2020
227 NE 2ST
$54,600, 000. 00 OCCUPANTS)I 26 OR MORE
LODGING UNITSI MULTIFAMILY
312000
61
713
453 x
(CONDO)
PROFESSI ON IT OFFICE / BANK/
28
BD17018177001B001
Active
8/5/2020
2545 NW 20 ST
$13155701. 00 FINANCIAL I NSTITUTIONI MINI
130697
8
60
0
STOR AGE &2 I, WAREHOUSING
29
BD19021170001B001
Active
5/13/2021
2655 S SAVSHORE
DR
$105,913, 676. 00 MULTI-FAMILY(CONDO)I
GENERAL RETAI L
593753
21
319-
301
30
BD20008561001 B001
Active
728/2021
2819 NW 1 AV
$24,438,035.00 MULTI -FAMILY (CONDO)
GENERAL RETAIL
230639
10
130:
84
31
BD20008570001 B001
Active
728/2021
2828 NW 1 AV
CONDO
$35,561, 965.00 AT
GENERAL RETAI L
200164
14
174
164
GENERAL COMMERCIALI
32
BD19025794001B001
Active
1/11/2021
286 NW 29 ST
$70,658,430. 00 PRO FESSIONAL OFFICE/BANK/
337107
36
408
306.
FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONI MULTI-
FAMILY (CONDO)
OTHER RETAILI PROFESSIONAL
33
BD17018425001B001
Active
1W/2019
2916 N MIAMI AV
$32146,400. 00 OFFICE/BANK/FINANCIAL
187064
8
7
0
INSTITUTION
34
BD19025892001B001
ACve
122/2020
2926 NW 18 AV
$5,891 292.00 MULTI -FAMILY (RENTAL)
101480
4
45
0
35
BD15008401001 B001
Active
326/2019
300 BISCAYNE
$333,507,475. 00 OTHER RETAILI MULTIFAMILY1904889
70
521
384
BLWY
(CONDO)
36
BD19011926001B001
ACOve
429/2020
301 NW 17 ST
$7,500, 000.00 MULTI -FAMILY (RENTAL)
69102
3
50
60
37
BID O01 702001 B001
Active
4/15/2020
3034 OAK AV
$18,362,750.00 MULTI-FAMILY(CONDO)
104930
5
50
52
38
BD17007007001B001
Active
11/14/2018
3156 SW 27 AV
$8,000, 000.00 MULTI-FAMILY(CONDO)
62393
5
9
23 x
OTHER RETAI LI PROFESSIONAL
39
BD17018573001B001
Active
1/13/2021
3750 S DIME HWY
$50,000, 000.00 OFFICE/ BANK /FINANCIAL
345129
8
82
191 x
NSTITUTI ONI MULTIFAMILY
RENTAL)
40
BD19008636001B001
Active
126/2021
3811 SHIPPING AV
$37,984,451.00 MULTI-FAMILV (RENTANI
GENERAL RETAI IT
217034
21
215
254
41
BD17016544001 B001
Active
1/16/2020
39 NW 7 AV
$10,308,101.00 MULTI -FAMILY (RENTAL)I
GENERAL COMM ER CI AL
58892
9
121
34 x
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report M
Permit Information
IWork items Information
Permit
Issued
New Addition
#of
LEED
No.
Permit Number
Address
Total Cost
Work Item
Height
Units
Status
Date
SQFT
Floors
Certification
84 BDI5014557001B001
Final
3131/2017
1170 NW 11 ST
$34.155,300.00 MULTI-FAMILY(RENTAL)
195156
8
90
233 x
OTHER RETAILI PROFESSIONAL
85 BDI8003242001B001
Final
5130/2019
120 NW 27 AV
$14315,70100 OFFICE/BANK/FINANCIAL
128970
11
124
0
INSTITUTIONI MINI STORAGE
&_p; WAREHOUSING
86 BD13013294001 B001
Final
1/8/2015
1201 NW 3AV
$14.000, 000.00 MULTI-FAMILY(RENTAL)
141238
11
108
70
123 SW NORTH
STORAGF &,nnp', WARFHOUSI NGI
37 SD13027108001B00I
Final
7f15f20I4
RIVER DR
$5,300,000.00
GENERAL OFFICE
97109.
3
114
0x
1300 BRICKELL
_
MULTI-FAMILY(CONDO)I
88 BDI3015901001B001
Final
4129/2013
$75.024, 394. 00. RESTAURANT(500R MORE
750122.
11
492-
374
BAY DR
OCCUPANTS)
OTHER RETAILI 26 OR MORE
89 BD13026109001 B001
Final
6/5/2015
1300 S MIAMI AV
$130078, 200.00 LODGING UNITSMULTI-FAMILY743304
54-
565
577 x
(CONDO)
90 BD15009056001B001
Final
3/8/2018
1310 NW 8 CT
$7089,550.00 MULTI -FAMILY (RENTAL)
71354.
8
91
40 x
91 BDI5016782001B001
Final
8/29/2017
1327 NW 3AV
$14320, 000.00 MULTI-FAMILY(CONDO)
81785:
5
55
90
92 BD12007164001B001
Final
4/29/2013
1350 NW 14 ST
$7949, 673.00 PUBLIC PARKING
170000
7
70
0
PROFESSIONAL OFFICE/BANK/
93 BDI8018477001B001
Final
6/24/2020
1355 NW 7ST
$18231,450.00 FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONI MULTI-
148071
11
106
150
.FAMILY (RENTAL)
94 BD12006310001B001
Final
11/6/2013
140 HE 39 ST
$31 589,533.00 OTHER RETAIL
331405
2
20
0
95 BD15007455001 B001
Final
4/13/2017
1424 NE MIAMI PIT
$103500,000.00 MULTI-FAMILY(RENTAQI
750947
33
335
710
GENERAL RETAI L
96 BD12001043001B001
Final
4/13/2012
1430 SW 1 ST
$5273,710.00 MULTI-FAMILY(CONDO)
81134.
6
67
60.
97 BD12006672001B001
Final
4/16/2013
144 SW 8ST
$10800, 000.00 MULTI-FAMILY(RENTAL)
118970
16
153-
64. x
98 BDI3020070001B001
Final
12/27l2013
145 SW 13 ST
$50000, 000.00 MULTI-FAMILY(RENTAL)
599395
8
100
418 x
99 BD120056110013001
Final
3/18/2013
145 SW 8ST
$15.031,250.00 MULTI-FAMILY(CONDO)
185000
23
230
98.
OTHER RETAI LI MULTI -FAMILY
100 BD14007776001B001
Final
12/14l2015
1451 BRI DRELL AV
$108000, 000.00(CONDO )I RESTAURANT (LESS
425786
53
623.
180. x
THAN 50 OCCUPANTS)
101 BD17007913001B001
Final
8122/2019
1500 NE MIAMI PL
$60000,000.00 OTHERRETAILI MULTI -FAMILY
619660
35
374
425
(RENTAL)
26 OR MORE LODGING UNITSI
102 BD14003728001B001
Final
9/29/2015
1500 SW 1 AV
$32.000, 000.00 RESTAURANT (50 OR MORE
205527.
13
149
275- x
_
OCCUPANTS)
103 BDI5006478001B001
Final
11/24l2015
1501 NW 13 CT
$13900, 000.00 MULTI-FAMILY(RENTAL)
124728,
11
110
73:
104 BDI5017177001B001
Final
12/23/2015
1501 SW 37 AV
$22.000, 000.0a MULTI-FAMILY(CONDO)I OTHER
96594
15
153
100:Q x
_
RETAIL _
105 BD14009389001BGOI
Final
8/18/2016
151 HE 41 ST
$42.898, 736.00 GENERAL RETAIL
169235
3
30
0
OTHER RETAILI PROFESSIONAL
106 BEL 30157420017001
Final
8/14/2014
151 SE ST
$40688, 649.00 OFFICE /BANK/FINANCIAL
320510
36
430
352'
INSTITUTION MULTI -FAMILY
(CONDO)
107 OD130170270010001
Final
5/17/2013
155 NW 3ST
$EO 000,000.00 P ROFESSIONAL OFFICE/BANK?
343140
14
336
0
FINANCIAL INSTITUTION
108 BD18014301001B001
Final
4/3/2020
1569 NW 17 AV
$28,600, 000.00 MULTI-FAMILY(RENTAL)
198480.
13
125
192 x
109 BDI3022970001B001
Final
12/15/2014
159 NW 9ST
$8000, 000.00 MULTI-FAMILY(RENTAL)
78500
8
95
60.
MULTI -FAMILY (CONDO)I
110 BD14011100001B001
Final
6/l/2017
1600 NE AV
$105000, 000.00 GENERAL OFFICEI GENERAL
972548
38
390
513. x
RETAI L
Ill BDI3020539001B001
Final
11/4/2014
1600 SW 1 AV
$28200, 000.00 MULTI-FAMILY(CONDO)
345000
15
180
128... x
112 BD13017517001B001
Final
5/28/2013
NVI
1BUI11LILDIN rAVG,.G._
$5144,994.00 RESCUE MISSION
63323
5
54
0
113 BDI5006276001B001
Final
3/2/2016
151 NW 5ST
$52.000, 000.00 PUBLIC PARKINGI GENERAL
446250
20
528
0
OFFICEI GENERAL RETAIL
114 BDI3022270001B001
Final
RI6/2014
152 HE 25 ST
$22.000, 00000 MULTI-FAMILY(CONDO)I OTHER
309424.
13
152
171 x
RETAIL
115 BD13016635001 B001
Final
5/21/2013
1657 N MIAMI AV
$13000, 000.00 MULTI-FAMILY(CONDO)I
GE N ERALCOMMERGAL
100803.
11
168
81
116 BDI3025023001B001
Final
5/14/2015
1699 NW 4 AV
$11 750, 000.00 MULTI -FAMILY (RENTAL)
113634
6
61
84.
GENERAL RETAILI GENERAL
117 BDI3017985001B001
Final
7/3/2013
1700 SW 2AV
$3871, 807.00 OFFICEI 25 OR MORE LODGING
52725
10
97
52
UNITS
25 OR MORE LODGING UNITSI
118 BD13011652001 B001
Final
2/3/2015
1760 SW 1 AV
$8200, 000.00 JUICE BAR/COFFEE
SHO P/BAKERY/DELI/ICE CREAM
83361
31
312.
102
SHOPICIGAR BAR
119 BDI5008443001B001
Final
5/10/2016
180 HE 29 ST
$64000, 000.00 OTHER RETAI LI MULTI -FAMILY
586764
21
212
309 x
CONDO)
120 BDI3014492001B001
Final
5/2/2013
186SE12TER
$20.000, 000.00 MULTI-FAMILY(CONDO)
146000
22
224
138.
121 BDI3015127001B001
Final
5/18/2015
1900 SVV 8 ST
$32.000, 000.00 MULTI-FAMILY(RENTAL)
317284
14
145
320
122 BDI3016033001B001
Final
4129/2013
200 SE 2 ST
$41020, 144.00 PUBLIC PARKING
795603
12
50
0
123 BDIG013252001B001
Final
9/18/2017
201 NW 37 AV
$11268,280.00 OTHER RETAILI MINI STORAGE
146489
8
95
0
_
&am IN WAREHOUSING
124 BDI3021546001B001
Final
5/7/2014
201 SE AV
$60147, 923.00 MULTI-FAMILY(RENTAL)
420130.
33
338
462
125 ED14011045001B001
Final
10/15/2015
201 SW 17 RD
$11,000, 000.00 MULTI-FAMILY(CONDO)
130453
10
102
81
2010 BISCAYNE
VEHICLE SHOWROOMI STORAGE
486000.
0
126 BDI3018329001B001
Final
11/26l2013
BLVD
$31200, 000.00
&-p', WAREHOUSING
2
2
127 ED15016532001B001
Final
1124/2017
212 HE 26 ST
$8,000, 000.00 MINISTORAGE&
WAREHOUSING
109551
6
60
0
Page 3 of 7 Thursday, September 16, 2021 3:55 PM
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report M
Permit Information
IWork items Information
Permit
Issued
New Addition
#of
LEED
No.
Permit Number
Status
Date
Address
Total Cost Work Item
SOFT
Floors
Height
Units
Certification
PROFESSIONAL OFFICE/BANK/
FI NANCIAL INSTITUTIONI CHURCH/
42
BDI0004434001B001
Active
7122/2021
398 HE 5 ST
$175262, 50100 RELIGIOUSFACILTYI MULTI-
951573
51
622
645
FAMILY (RENTAL)I JUICE BAR/
COFFEE SHOP/BAKERY/DELI/ICE
CREAM SHOP/CIGAR BAR
43
BD20025863001B001
Active
4126/2021
3aaa
$72.018, 812.00 SHELL ONLY
65755
2
49:
0
RICKENBACKER
44
BDI8003613001B001
Active
10/11/2019
40 NW 3ST
$38000, 000.00 MULTI-FAMILY(RENTAL)
204000.
30
300'
300. x
45
BD20003622001B001
Active
6/7/2021
uuI Nw lvurerH ER DR
RIV
$22000, 00100 MULTI-FAMILY(RENTAL)
97432.
12
107
160
46
BD20003627001B001
Active
2/11/2021
4UIN NVKIn
RIVER DR
$5.800, 000.00 MULTI-FAMILY(RENTAL)
89646.
4
34
0
OTHER RETAI LI BEOFESSIONAL
OFFICE/ BANK /FINANCIAL
47
BDIG012577001B001
Active
D30/2018
420 SW 7ST
$26.000, 000.00 INSTITUTIONI STORAGE&',
144906.
18.
216
57
WAREHOUSINGI MULTI -FAMILY
(RENTAL)
48
BDI3017810001B001
Active
6/11/2013
5271 SW 8ST
$4.941, 544.00 MULTI-FAMILY(CONDO)
60819
1
50
60.
49
BDI8019396001B001
Active
6/l/2020
53 HE 5ST
$150000,000.00 OTHER RETAI LI MULTI -FAMILY
1422969
52
492
1042
(RENTAL)
50
BDI8018876001B001
Active
11/27/2019
5700 BISCAYNE
$50000, 000.00 MULTI-FAMILY(RENTAL)I
277226
9
98�
283
BLVD
GENERAL RETAI L
51
BD19002313001 B001
Active
7/19/2021
590WFLAGLER ST
$15,910,23200 GENERAL COMMERCIALI MULTI-
124425
14
169
95
FAMILY (RENTAL)
52
BDI9023645001B001
Active
6/7/2021
610 NW 60 ST
$15490, 000.00 MULTI-FAMILY(RENTAL)
88487
8
67'
100
53
BDI5009516001B001
Active
8/28/2019
5445 ME AV
$51.939, 16500 MULTI-FAMILY(RENTAL)I
502597
9
185
235
COMMUNITY SUPPORT FACILITY
54
BD19006944001 B001
Active
5/18/2020
650 HE 2 AV
$103069,426.00 OTHER RETAILI MULTI -FAMILY
589071
44
537
434
RENTAL)
55
BD19008843001B001
Active
12/31/2019
700 HE 2 AV
$55000, 000.00 260R MORE LODGING UNITS
127332
12
142,
351
56
BDI8015490001B001
Active
2GU2020
702 SW 1 ST
$31 225, 000.00 OTHER RETAILI MULTI -FAMILY
314400
8
95
194 x
RENTAL)
57
BD15008745001 B001
Active
2/l/2019
788 HE 23 ST
$84578,275.00 MULTI-FAMILY(CONDO)
483293;
57
646
98 x
PROFESSIONAL OFFICE/BANKI
58
BDI8018113001B001
Active
4/19/2021
830 SE AV
$97141,450. 00 FINANCIAL I NSTITUTIONI GENERAL
505031
39
723
0 x
.COMMERCIAL
59
BDI8018475001B001
Active
5/27/2020
850 NW 13 CT
$22.423, 800.00 MULTI -FAMILY (RENTAL)
136000
13
ill
168
MULTI -FAMILY (RENTAL)I
60
BD17018184001B001
Active
4/16/2019
850 NW 42 AV
$54864, 36180 PROFESSIONAL OFFICE I BANK/
434404
11
72
230 x
FINANCIAL INSTITUTION
61
BDI5007674001B001
Active
4/24/2018
851 HE 1 AV
$159235, 300.00 MULTI-FAMILY(CONDO)I OTHER
963705
59
706
561 x
RETAI L
62
BDI9006982001B001
Active
5/l/2020
90 NW 29 ST
$38000, 000.00 MULTI-FAMI LY(RENTAL)I
202383,
12
166
189�
GENERAL RETAI L
Permit Status: Expired
63 BD20004501001B001
Expired
1/27/2021
2926 NW 18 AV
$16.702,351.00 MULTI -FAMILY (RENTAL)
95442
8
66
120�
PROFESSIONAL OFFICE/BANK/
64 BD14003800001B001
Expired
4/10/2014
530 NW 1 CT
$10,000, 000.00 FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONI OTHER
324858
58.
70
0
RETAI L
65 BD17005975001B001
Expired
6/17/2019
5591 SW 8 ST
$7.642,200.00 MINI STORAGE &
76422
5
60
0
WAREHOUSING
Permit Status: Final
66 BDIG018173001B001
Final
5/11/2018
100 SW 22 AV
$18483, 810.00 MULTI-FAMILY(RENTAL)
128160.
8
112.
96
x
67 BD12010756001B001
Final
11/25/2015
1010 BISCAYNE
BLVD
$191782, 000.00 OTHER RETAI LI MULTI -FAMILY
(CONDO)
962270
64
707
84'
x
68 BD14014407001 B001
Final
1/3/2017
1000 BRICKELL PLZ
$173302,140.00 MULTI-FAMILY(CONDO)I
GENERAL RETAIL
_
1575474.
65
714
549
69 BD17017989001B001
Final
TPEJ2019
1000 NW 7 ST
$12.000, 000.00 OTHER RETAILI MULTI -FAMILY
292627
13
160
141
x
RENTAL)
70 BD18012139001 B001
Final
10/4/2019
1001 NW 7ST
$51596,400.00 MULTI -FAMILY (RENTAL)295408.
8
1
346
x
71 BD14009789001 B001
Final
4/1/2015
1010 BRICKELL AV
$107024,108.00 MULTI-FAMILY(CONDO)I
506460
48
2
387
GENERAL RETAIL
_
72 BD14009268001B001
Final
12/24/2015
1010 SW 2AV
$32.000, 000.00 MULTI-FAMILY(C0 NDO)I
382097
23
245
155
x
' GENERAL COMM ERCl AL
_
73 BD14012803001 B001
Final
9/11/2015
1025 SW 30 AV
$11500, 000.00 MULTI-FAMILY(RENTAL)
73150.
5
48
133
74 BD13017714001 B001
Final
7/19/2013
1080 BPI CKELL AV
$31416,938.00 MULTI-FAMILY(CONDO)
386670,
45
458
328
75 BD1302565800l B001
Final
1/9/2015
110 SW 9ST
$4,760, 028.00 OTHER RETAILI PUBLIC PARKING
198546.
15
160
0
OTHER RETAILI 26 OR MORE
76 BD13024837001 B001
Final
10/8/2015
1110 BRICKELL
$255000,000.00 LODGING UNITSI MULTI'FAMILY1844181
85
1510
1029
BAY DR
(RENTAL)I RESTAURANT(500R
MORE OCCUPANTS)
_
77 BD15008780001 B001
Final
12/27/2016
1100 HE 79 ST
$8000, 000.00 MINISTORAGE&
112599
5
65'
0!
WAREHOUSING
78 BDI3025125001B001
Final
11/25/2013
1100SMIAMI AV
$57765, 137.00 MULTI-FAMILY(CONDO)I
GENERAL RETAI L
645250
44
480
382
79 BDI3016118001B001
Final
4/30/2013
D tsl�CHrNc
BLVD
$82061,800.00 ART GALLERY
118215
1
15
B
80 BDI5007502001B001
Final
6/3/2016
1103 SW 3 AV
$8000, 000.00 STORAGE&', WAREHOUSING
111000
8
98
0
81 BD13014922001 B001
Final
2Y25/2016
112 HE 41 ST
$12,000,000.00 PROFESSIONAL OFFICE / BANK /
97352'
8
100.
G
FINANCIAL INSTITUTION
82 BD12003045001B001
Final
1/23/2014
1128 NW 7 AV
$11 546,925.00 MULTI -FAMILY (CONDO)
142116
12
106
94
R
83 BD13016124001B001
Final
12/11/2013
1146 NW 7 CT
$10350, 000.00 MULTI -FAMILY (RENTAL)
115000
11
97'
67=
Page 2 of 7
Thursday, September 16,
2021
3:55 PM
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report M
Permit Information I Work items Information
No. Permit Number Permit Issued Address Total Cost Work Item New Addition #of Height Units LEED
Status Date SQFT Floors Certification
128 BD16012001001B001 Final 9;20J2016 217 NW 15 ST $16.000, 000.00 COMMUNITY FACILITY 120000 5 60 0
129 BD14011515001B001 Final 9/4/2015 21909W 8ST $5375, 000.00 STORAGE&annp, WAREHOUSING 101902 7 71 0
130 BD17015065001 B001 Final V1912019 221 SW 12 ST $45.000, 000 00 MULTI -FAMILY (RENTAL)I 255000 25 252 252 x
GENERAL RETAI IT
O THEIR RETAILI RR OFESSIONAL
131 BD16009244001B001 Final 5/29/2018 222 NW 24 ST $12.492,925.00 OFFICE/BANK/FINANCIAL 71386 9 108 0
INSTILL HI ONI RESTAURANT (I FSS
_ THAN 50 OCCUPANTS)
132 BD13015992001 E3001 Final 4/26/2013 2263 SW 37 AV $20450, 000.00 MULTI-FAMILY(CONDO) 207265. 10 400 237
OTHER RETAI LI MULTI -FAMILY
(RENTAL)I BAR / TAVERN (LESS
133 BD15008217001B001 Final 7/10/2017 230 HE ST $124.180, 000.00 THAN 50OCCUPANTS)I JUICE BAR 746942 35 362, 464
/ COFFEE SHOP/BAKEPWDELIIICE
CREAM SHOP/CIGAR BAR
134 BD13015883001B001 Final D18/2014 230 SW 12 ST $13000, 000.00 MULTI-FAMILY(RENTAL) 95000. 16 160 103
MULTI-FAMI LY (RENTAL)
135 BD13015555001B001 Final 1/17/2014 2350 SW 27 AV $10,000, 000.00 G ON FRAIL COMMERCl ALI 110010 12 120 121
PRO FESSI COAL OFFI CE I BANK/
FINANCIAL INSTITUTION
135 BDI5009247001B001 Final V1212018 240 NW 25 ST $55.000, 000.00 OTHER RETAI LI MULTI -FAMILY 239414 8 802K x
RENTAL)
137 BD12008286001 E3001 Final 4/5/2013 240 SW 9ST $5700, 000.00 MULTI-FAMILY(RENTAL) 67628 13 150 116
138 BD15007187001 B001 Final 5/20/2016 2434 SW 28 LN $5901, 663.00 STORAGE &', WAREHOUSING 78792 8 93 0
139 BD14003765001B001 Final 1/13/2015 245 HE 14 ST $60,000,00000 OTHER RETAI LI MULTI -FAMILY 839292 39 389 497 x
RENTAL)
140 BD14013816001 B001 Final 7/19/2016 "Uu 11-AY IVt $30712,500.00 MULTI-FAMILY(CONDO) 378000' 20 217 156 x
BLVD
141 BD1700337800l B001 Final 5123/2018 2500 SW 28 LJN $14,600, 000.00 MINI STORAGE & 146000 8 120 0
_ WAREHOUSING "
142 BD14011701001 B001 Final 5/4/2015 255 SW 11 ST $60830,744.00 MULTI-FAMILY(RENTAL) 615585 24 253 372 x
143 BD13016753001B001 Final 5/13/2013 2601 NW 16 STRB $18445, 619.00 MULTI-FAMILY(CONDO) 227023. 8 75 250
OTHER RETAI LI PROFESSIONAL
OFFICE/ BANK /FINANCIAL
144 BD15009003001B001 Final 3/9/2017 2660 NW 3AV $26.867,950.00 INSTITUTIONI PUBLICPARKINGI 128335' 10 140 0
RESTAURANT (50 OR MORE
OCCUPANTS)
145 BD16008777001 B001 Final 4128/2017 2701 BISCAYNE $52,084,371.00 OTHER RETAILI MULTI -FAMILY 297624 9 2 330 x
BLVD (RENTAL)
146 BD13026703001B001 Final 4/7/2015 2701 SW 27 CT $28800, 000.00 OTHER RETAILI MULTI -FAMILY 218103 15 144. 184.
RENTAL)
147 BEL 5003214001 B001 Final 10/5/2015 2805 SW 32 AV $6.859, 96100 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 55000 5 65 1300
OTHER RETAILI PROFESSIONAL
2811 SBAYSHORE OFFICE/BANK/FINANCIAL
148 BD14013442001B001 Final 11/22/2016 DR $175000, 000.00 INSTITUTIONI RESTAURANT (50 OR 974792 61 392 272 x
MO REOCCUPANTS)I MULTI-
FAMILY (CONDO)
149 BD17016542001B001 Final 4/4/2019 2811 SW 22 ST $12.480,450.00 MINI SI ORATE &ernp; 120573 6 2 0
WAREHOUSINGI GENERALRETAIL
OTHER RETAILI PROFESSIONAL
150 BD19000873001B001 Final 11/1/2019 2850 TIGERTAIL AV $32.643,913.00 OFFICE/BANK/FINANCIAL 104690 9 121 0'
INSTITUTION
151 BD17002520001B001 Final N27/2018 2900 HE 2 AV $35.000, 000.00 MULTI-FAMILY(RENTAL) 474684 8 100 208
MULTI -FAMILY (CONDO)I OTHER
152 BD14002748001B001 Final 1125/2016 2900 HE AV $143515,375.00 RETAI LI RESTAU PANT (LESS THAN 1174325 52 714 391 x
50 OCCUPANTS)
OTHER RETAI LI PROFESSIONAL
153 BD17009356001B001 Final 12/12/2019 2900 SW 28 UN $21800, 000.00 OFFICE /BANK/FINANCIAL 234365 35 196 130 x
NSTITUTI ONI MULTI -FAMILY
(RENTAL)
154 ED16015844001B001 Final 1131/2018 2901 HE AV $73,100, 000.00 OTHER RETAI LI MULTI -FAMILY 426782 28 312 387
RENTAL)
26 OR MORE LODGING U NI TSI
155 BD15014334001 B001 Final 8124/2017 2888 MC FARLANE $18,108,417 00 RESTAURANT (50 OR MORE 61799 7 120 102 x
RD OCCUPANTS) BAR/TAVERN
(LESS THAN 50 OCCUPANTS)
156 BD15002938001B001 Final 10/8/2015 300 NW 36 ST $13000, 000.00 STORAGE &', WAREHOUSING 223562 7 58 0.
157 BD15001727001B001 Final 5/16/2016 300 SE ST $24386, 00000 OTHER RETAI LI THEATER 177310 13 121 0
CONCERT HALL
158 BD17002519001 B001 Final 6/29/2018 3000 HE 2AV $114000, 000.00 MULTI-FAMILY(RENTAL) 1235348 14 180 511 x
159 BD17000595001B001 Final 9127/2018 3095 SW 39 AV $3500, 000.00 GENERAL OFFICEI GENERAL , 74523 10 114 72855
_ RETAILI GENERAL COMMERCIAL
160 BD13016618001 B001 Final 5/13/2013 31 SE ST $18272,963.00 MULTI-FAMILY(CONDO) 224898 1 273. 192
161 BD16017723001B001 Final 8120/2019 3101 HE AV $136.410,92600 OTHER RETAI LI MULTI -FAMILY 779491 32 325 447
_ (RENTAL)
162 BD14011309001B001 Final NDU2016 3131 HE AV $74352,96400 MULTI-FAMI LY(CONDO)I 742980 52 312 273
GENERAL RETAI L
163 BD16012246001B001 Final 9;20J2017 3170 SW 22 ST $30555, 312.00 COMMUNITY FAD I LITYI OTHER 168534 15 216 190:
RETAIL MULTI-FAMILY(RENTAL)
164 BD14005993001B001 Final 5A/2016 3201 HE AV $85000, 000.00 PUBLICPARK INGI GENERAL 652147 17 212 400
RETAIL MULTI-FAMILY(RENTAL)
155 BD15014594001B001 Final 8/10/2016 321 HE 25 ST $17.000, 000.00 MULTI-FAMILY(CONDO) 170326. 10 130 86� x
166 BD17004019001B001 Final 4/2/2018 33 SE ST $30000, 000.00 OTHER RETAILI PUBLIC PARKING 286285 12 150 0';
167 BD16007943001B001 Final 4/18/2018 AMERICANDR $13287,789.00 OTHER RETAILI PUBLIC PARKING 162044 4 41 0
Page 4 of 7 Thursday, September 16, 2021 3:55 PM
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report M
Permit Information
IWork items Information
Permit
Issued
New Addition
#of
LEED
No.
Permit Number
Address
Total Cost
Work Item
Height
Units
Status
Date
SQFT
Floors
Certification
168 BDI3021627001B001
Final
6/11/2014
3380 NW 17 AV
$12.000, 000.00 MULTI-FAMILY(CONDO)
167254
8
95
100
169 BDI5008744001B001
Final
11/30l2016
340 SE ST
$88000, 000.00 MULTI-FAMILY(RENTAL)
372000
35
492
391
MULTI -FAMILY (RENTAL)I
170 BD12011249001 B001
Final
10/3/2013
340 W FLAGLER ST
$35000, 000.00 PROFESSIONAL OFFICE I BANK/
539000
32
362.
250'
'FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONI OTHER
RETAIL
3400 1411 BISCAYNE
260R MOST I O DGI N G U NI TSI
171 BD16015033001B001
Final
3/15/2018
ST
$18.173, 000.00 RESTAURANT {50 OR MORE
110576.
9
109
153BLV.
:OCCUPANTS)
26 OR MORE LODGING U NI TSI
172 BD14014244001B001
Final
10/21/2016
3401 HE 1 AV
$102.101, 600 00 MULTIFAMILY(CONDO)I GENERAL
489957
41
415
470x
CGMMERCIALI RESTAURANT (50
OR MORE OCCUPANTS)
173 BD15001860001B001
Final
11/4/2015
3401 NW 17 AV
$13000, 000.00 MULTI-FAMILY(CONDO)
135880'
8
87
77
174 BD14005002001B001
Final
9/30/2015
1Nc ""` "
BLVD
$12.000, 000.00 26 OR MORE LODGING UNITS
146574
8
71
151 x
175 BD1500W23001B001
Final
7/13/2016
3460 SW 8 ST
$7,800, 000.00 MINI STORAGE &
119800
5
60
0-
WAREHOUSING
176 BD18011414001B001
Final
2122/2019
35 SW 6AV
$12.793, 11200 OTHER RETAI LI MULTI -FAMILY
122555
26
123
100 x
'(RENTAL)
177 BD16001838001B001
Final
7/25/2017
3530 NW 36 ST
$16.812,426.00 MULTI-FAMILY(RENTAL)
96071
13
10:
105
178 BD16013395001 B001
Final
3Y20/2018
ST, 1GLcrvwc
$17000, 000.00 MULTI-FAMILY(CONDO)
74594
10
100-
26
179 BD14005815001B001
Final
5/18/2015
3622 SW 22 ST
$27000, 000.00 MULTI-FAMILY(RENTAL)
107100
13
136
120
180 BD12010401001 B001
Final
5/28/2013
3625 NW 20 AV
$5443,750.00 MULTI-FAMILY(CONDO)
67000.
7
80
117
181 BDI3016103001B001
Final
5/6/2015
3629 GRAND AV
$5.427,200.00 LEARNING CENTER I MULTI-
65185
5
56
56
FAMILY (RENTAL)
182 BD14014722001B001
Final
9/11/2015
3635 HE AV
$55.485, 000.00 MULTI-FAMILY(RENTAL)I
294960
22
220
195
GENERAL RETAIL
183 BDI5015224001BOOl
Final
5131/2016
3566 SW 22 ST
$7.401, 000.00 I NI STORAGE &
74000
5
81
0
WAREHOUSING
184 BD14007684001 B001
Final
6126/2015
3683 SMIAMI AV
$8.016,988.00 PROFESSIONAL OFFICE/BANK/
98546
2
5
0 x
FINANCIAL INSTITUTION
185 BD15009136001B001
Final
6/14/2016
3725 NW 27 AV
$8822,500.00 STORAGE &', WAREHOUSING
88225
6
65
0 x
186 BDI5014542001B001
Final
10/31l2016
3737 PEACOCK AV
$35000, 000.00 MULTI-FAMILY(RENTAL)
200000
8
83
181 x
187 BD13019351001 B001
Final
4/10/2014
3760 BIRD RD
$33422, 000.00 MULTI-FAMILY(RENTAL)
334370
12
98'
262 x
188 BD12010179001B001
Final
11/7/2014
3800 NE 1 AV
$18255,462.00 PUBLIC PARKING
277593.
7
86
0
189 BD15005811001B001
Final
11/30/2016
3851 BIRD RD
$14,258,12500 AUTO RELATED COMMERCIAL
81475
5
73
0
.ESTABLISHMENT
25 OR MORE LODGING U NI TSI
190 BDI3016396001B001
Final
A23/2013
3861 BIRD RD
$8615, 019.00RESTAURANT(500R MORE
106531
11
122;
103_
OCCUPANTS)
191 BD12009231001B001
Final
7123/2013
3880 SW BIRD RD
$38.187, 500.00 MULTI-FAMILY(RENTAL)
470000
8
74
276
OTHER RETAILI PROFESSIONAL
192 BDI5008697001B001
Final
2/28/2019
3110 BISCAYNE
$38000, 000.00 OFFICE/BANK/FINANCIAL
184901
18
252
198.
BLVD
INSTITUTIONI PUBLICPARKINGI
MULTIFAMILY(RENTAL)
PROFESSIONAL OFFICE/BANK/
193 BD17018492001B001
Final
3/02019
3930 NW 7 ST
$18000, 000.00 FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONI MULTI-
193273
9
87
120 x
FAMILY (RENTAL)
26 OR MORE LODGING U NI TSI
194 BDI5004780001B001
Final
2/25/2016
4021 NW 11 ST
$15000, 000.00 BARITAVERN (LESSTHAN 50
98500
7
94
165 x
'OCCU PANTS)I RESTAURANT (LESS
THAN 50 OCCUPANTS)
195 BDI3016081001B001
Final
4/30/2013
4210 BISCAYNE
$15801, 000.00 PUBLIC PARKINGI MULTI -FAMILY
299150
14
132.
167
BLVD
(PUBLIC
OTHER RETAIL
196 BDI3020069001BOOl
Final
7/19/2013
430 SW 8 AV
$4.725,500.00 MULTI -FAMILY (CONDO)
58160
4.
50
27
197 BDI3017712001B001
Final
6/3/2013
447 HE 22 ST
$41902, 819.00 MULTI-FAMILY(CONDO)
515727
31
273
258.
198 BDI6017550001B001
Final
1/1IJ2018
455 HE 24 ST
$47.518, 10100 MULTI-FAMILY(RENTAL)
272052.
8
70
297 x
199 BD14001782001B001
Final
8/5/2015
455 HE 39 ST
$12.455, 891.00 MULTI-FAMILY(CONDO)
70901
3
38
38&
200 BD13013657001 B001
Final
3/19/2015
460 HE 28 ST
$67409, 156.00 MULTI-FAMILY(CONDO)I OTHER
RETAI L
754693
44
461
299" x
201 BD15008622001 B001
Final
4/19/2017
480 HE 31 ST
$135895, 850.00 MULTI-FAMILY(CONDO)I OTHER
RETAI L
834351.
55
609
313. x
202 BD15001641001 B001
Final
12/23l2015
488 HE 18 ST
$80000, 000.00 MULTI-FAMILY(CONDO)I
GENERAL COMMERCIAL
975387-
52
511
648
203 BDI5008786001B001
Final
7/19/2016
490 NW 36 ST
$7 053,509.00 MINI STORAGE &
WAREHOUSING
112819
7
84
0 x
204 BDI5002212001B001
Final
1/20/2017
501 HE 31 ST
$95306, 650.00 OTHER RETAILI MULTI -FAMILY
544598
45
212
384 x
CONDO)
205 BDI3021395001B001
Final
8/15/2014
501 NW 36 ST
$4259,444.00 OTHER RETAIL
52547
3
41
0 x
206 BD16009637001 E3001
Final
3/11/2019
51 NW 26 ST
$35782,564.00 GENERAL RETAILI APARTMENT
240174
6
100
175 x
HOTEL
207 BD17011979001 B001
Final
3/9/2017
514 SW 22 AV
$3900, 000.00 MULTI-FAMILY(RENTAL)
94638
8
83
72
208 BD15008043001B001
Final
1127/2016
542 NW 12 AV
$11.176, 025.00 MIDDLE/HIGH SCHOOL
105000
7
1
1400
OTHER RETAI LI PROFESSIONAL
209 BDI8010247001B001
Final
10/9/2019
545 NW 26 ST
$74454, 848.00 OFFICE/BANK/FINANCIAL
5127K
10
85
0 x
INSTITUTION
210 BD17001604001 B001
Final
3/21/2018
5479 NW 7 ST
$41 553,235.00 MULTI -FAMILY (RENTAL)
540790
8
12
330 x
211 BD14003634001B001
Final
6130/2015
55 SW 9ST
$114654, 81300 PUBLIC PARKINGI MULTI -FAMILY
1427374
65
223
690- x
(PUBLIC
GENERAL RETAIL
Page 5 of 7 Thursday, September 16, 2021 3:55 PM
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report M
Appendices
Permit Information
IWork items Information
Permit
Issued
New Addition
#of
LEED
No.
Permit Number
Status
Date
Address
Total Cost
Work Item
SQFT
Floors
Height
Units
Certification
212 ED15000650001B001
Final
1/5/2015
5609 NE 2 AV
$4,400, 000.00 MINISTORAGE&
70950
5
60
0
WAREHOUSING
213 BD12008045001B001
Final
5/16/2013
571 SW 9ST
$10750, 878.00 MULTI-FAMILY(RENTAL)
97655
9
108
89
214 BDI5007458001B001
Final
7/30/2018
58 HE 14 ST
$85000, 000.00 MULTI-FAMILY(RENTAL)I
1016745
34
421
656 x
GENERAL COMMERCIAL
215 BD17017924001B001
Final
12/17/2018
58 NE 53 ST
$7.350, 000.00 GENERAL COMMERCIAL
120080
3
30
120080
210 BID 46008305001B00"I
Final
3l27f20"IS
5900 NW 7 AV
$22.159, 830.00 Ml11 TI-FAMII Y (RFNTAI )1
227822
7
34
160P x
GENERAL COMMERCIAL
217 BDI3023497001B001
Final
10/24l2014
600 HE 27 ST
$36.449, 669.00 MULTI-FAMILY(CONDO)
460919
36
356
165, x
218 BDI3022933001B001
Final
4/28/2014
601 HE 27 ST
$26.778,500.00 MULTI-FAMILY(CONDO)
235170
18
207
90� x
219 BD14002054001B001
Final
1/16/2015
601 HE 39 ST
$11326, 575.00 MULTI-FAMILY(RENTAL)
132404
5
50:
141
OTHER RETAILI MULTI -FAMILY
220 BDI3017474001B001
Final
2/26/2014
601 SMIAMI AV
$201954, 131.00 (CONDO)I JUICE BAR COFFEE
1788667
41
552:
390
SHOPIBAKERY/DELI/ICE CREAM
_
SHOP/CIGAR BAR
221 BDI3016908001B001
Final
D17/2013
504 NW 12 AV
$5.525, 000.00 LEARNINGCENTER
68000.
8
176
0
PROFESSIONAL OFFICE/BANK/
222 BDI3013315001B001
Final
6/25/2014
6101 NW 7AV
$17278, 288.00 FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONI MULTI-
175812
10
96
76 x
FAMILY (RENTAL)
223 BDI0002859001B001
Final
12/30/2015
6145 NW 7AV
$21000, 000.00 OTHER RETAI LI MULTI -FAMILY
142700
18
202
100 x
RENTAL)
224 BDI5011433001B001
Final
4/14/2016
641 NW 12 AV
$6380, 614.00 STORAGE&, WAREHOUSING'
101784
5
74
0.
225 BD17017873001 B001
Final
8/29/2018
644 NW 30 ST
$7992, 859.00 STORAGE&', WAREHOUSING
142533
7
70
0
226 ROL 6011808001 B001
Final
12/1/2017
645 NWIST
$12.673, 603.00 MULTI-FAMILY(RENTAL)
158619
8
8
100
227 BD14004342001B001
Final
8/10/2015
650 HE 32 ST
$115.095, 533. 00 OTHER RETAI LI MULTI -FAMILY
607236
46
412
366 x
CONDO)
228 BDI5008487001B001
Final
G7/2018
698 HE AV
$132.000, 000.00 MULTI-FAMI LY(RENTAL)I
342363
33
495
444
GENERAL RETAI L
229 BDI3017412001B001
Final
DIS/2014
6991 SW 8ST
$6209, 000.00 GAS STATION OTHER RETAIL
54521
2
38
0
OTHER RETAILI PROFESSIONAL
230 BDI3017473001B001
Final
2126/2014
700 SMIAMI AV
$261450, 644.00 OFFICE/BANK/FINANCIAL
2450323
75
950
413
INSTITUTIONI MULTI -FAMILY
(CONDO)
OTHER RETAILI PROFESSIONAL
OFFICE/ BANK / FINANCIAL
231 BD13017475001B001
Final
2/26/2014
701 SMIAMI AV
$121828887.00 USTI TUTIONI 260RMOPE
1361679
56
968
352
LODGING UNITSI MULTI -FAMILY
_
,(CONDO)
232 BDI3017560001B001
Final
5/28/2013
716 HE 85 ST
$4876, 000.00 MULTI-FAMILY(CONDO)
60000
5
50
64
233 BD14004133001B001
Final
10/3/2016
729 NW 2ST
$26325, 000.00 MULTI-FAMILY(RENTAL)
324000.
12
120
223 x
234 BDI3022399001B001
Final
4/7/2015
750 NW 69 ST
$9500, 000.00 MULTI-FAMILY(RENTAL)
109120
8
79
80
235 ROL 3022405001 B001
Final
4/7/2015
755 NW 57 ST
$8500, 000.00 MULTI-FAMILY(RENTAL)
95480
8
79
70
230 BDI00030080018001
Final
2/27/2017
780 NW 13 CT
$12.200, 603.00 MULTI-FAMILY(RENTAL)
109326
7
70
104
237 ROL 6003197001 B001
Final
12/21/2017
7865 NE 10 AV
$12.750, 025.00 OTHER RETAI LI STORAGE&,
WAREHOUSING
124957
6
70
0
238 BDI3021887001B001
Final
IOAJ2013
BAYSH ORE CT
BAY SH
$60000, 000.00 MULTI-FAMILY(RENTAL)
791168
20
216
467
239 BD13913396001 B001
Final
10/30l2013
800 W FLAG LER ST
$5021,'Do .00 MINI STORAGE &
WAREHOUSING
89264
7
90.
0
PUBLIC PARKINGI MULTI -FAMILY
(CONDO )I GENERAL RETAILI
240 BD14009787001B001
Final
D19/2016
801 SMIAMI AV
$165000, 000.00 RESTAURANT (500R MORE
917700.
62
1014
522
OCCUPANTS )1260R MORE
LODGING UNITS
241 BD12006612001B001
Final
4/16/2013
850 SW 2AV
$13000, 000.00 MULTI-FAMILY(RENTAL)
159522
16
153
89
242 BD1401285nOl BQ01
Final
11/23/2015
86 SW 8ST
$95,000, 00000 OTHER RETAI IT MULTI-FAMI LY
351767.
49
512
438
(RENTAL)
243 ROL 6011277001 B001
Final
11/17/2017
888 HE 2 AV
$58771075.00 PUBLIC PARKINGI GENERAL
567227
g
120
P
RETAI L
244 BDI5005921001B001
Final
6/2/2017
90 NE 41 ST
$34800, 000.00 PUBLIC PARKING
348000
7
74
0
245 BDI5008993001B001
Final
1/26/2016
91 SW 3 ST
$7200, 000.00 STORAGE &', WAREHOUSING
I10500.
7
75
0 x
246 BDI3022968001B001
Final
12/15l2014
919 NW 2 AV
$11 900, 000.00 MULTI -FAMILY (RENTAL)
120000
8
955
98.
247 BDI3022971001B001
Final
12/15l2014
919 NW 2AV
$4500, 000.00 PUBLIC PARKING
80000
4
53
0
248 BDI3014928001B001
Final
1/9/2015
940 SW 1AV
$27790,498.00 OTHER RETAI LI MULTI -FAMILY
228732
24
250
176 x
RENTAL)
249 BDI3028063001B001
Final
6/14/2016
95 NW 23 ST
$10000, 000.00 MIDDLE/HIGH SCHOOL
192081
1
91
1435, x
250 BDI8006722001B001
Final
N18/2019
961 SW 7ST
$7769,793.00 OTHER RETAI LI MULTI -FAMILY
68926,
4
48
44
RENTAL)
251 BD12006534001 B001
Final
2/22/2013
987 SW 37 AV
$9262,500.00 MULTI -FAMILY (RENTAL)
114000
12
118
120
252 BDI3016418001B001
Final
5/3/2013
999 SW 1 AV
$63200, 000.00 PUBLIC PARKINGI MULTI -FAMILY
801820
43
490
390
CONDO)
Permit Status: Hold
PROFESSIONAL OFFICE/BANKl
253 BD17008780001B001
Hold
10/212017
101 NW 8ST
$8116, 561 00 FINANCI AL INSTITUTIONI OTHER
55000
2
24
0 x
RETAI L
Page 6 of 7 Thursday, September 16, 2021 3:55 PM
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report n
Appendices
Permit Information
IWork items Information
Permit
Issued
New Addition
#of
LEED
No.
Permit Number
Status
Address
Date
Total Cost
Work Item
SQFT
Floors
Height
Units
Certification
ARTGALLERYI GENERAL
COMMERCIAL OTHER RETAI ITPROFESSIONAL
OFFICE I BANK/
254 BD13021838001 B001
Hold
11/13/2013 1101 BISCAYNE
$106000, 000.00. FINANCIAL INSTITUTION
156700
19
173
0
BLVD
BANQUET/EVENT HALL/DANCE
HALLI RESTAURANT (50 OR MORE
OCCUPANTS)I COMMUNITY
FACILITY
OTHER RETAILS PROFESSIONAL
1500 NW NORTH
OFFICE/BANK/FINANCIAL
255 BDI5008466001B001
Hold
6120/2019 RIVER DR
$126,801,088.00 INSTITUTION RESTAURANT (50 OR
730731
29
332.
528.
MO RE OCCUPANTS)I MULTI-
FAMILY (RENTAL}
256 BD17016346001B001
Hold
7/19/2019 4GROVE ISLE DR
$18.642,300.00 MULTI-FAMI LY(CONDO)
75638
7
90
26
257 BD18013439001B001
Hold
2/24/2020 4GROVE ISLE DR
$96.701, 169.00 MULTI-FAMILY(CONDO)
440027.
7-
60:
65.
258 BD15008595001B001
Hold
5/20/2019 700 HE 26 TER
$136558,875.00 MULTI-FAMILY(CONDO)
975765
58
696•
146 x
Page 7 of 7 Thursday, September 16, 2021 3:55 PM
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report M
Appendices
APPENDIX G.
DISCUSSION COMMENTS AND
ASSOCIATED RECOMMENDATIONS
The following tables outline the discussion comments made by the Task Force during the
meetings and cross reference the associated recommendations.
Notes:
• Each comment has a unique discussion item number shown in the first column
• Recommendations are separately referenced in the fifth column. The first letter is
the discussion topic classification, followed by the recommendation number (i.e. A.1
refers to Affordability, Recommendation 1).
A. Affordability
B. Climate Change and Resiliency
C. Quality of Life
D. Prosperity
E. Service
F. Assessment
• Not all comments have recommendations
• Not all recommendations have comments associated with them
• Some recommendations respond to more than one comment
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report M
Appendices
A. AFFORDABILITY
A RESOLUTION TO PROVIDE ACCESSIBLITY, AVAILABILITY, AND INCETIVES FOR APPLICANTS TO
PROVIDE AFFORDABLE HOUSING RECOMMENDATIONS INTO THE MIAMI 21 AD HOC TASK FORCE
REPORT
Item #
Sub -Topic
Comment
Modifications
Recom
mendat
ion#
Recommendation
1
Definitions
Amend
A.1
Amend
affordable/workforce
Affordable/Workforce
definitions to be clear
Housing definitions to
and consistent with US
be clear and
HUD and adjust
consistent with US
individual incentives
Housing and Urban
based on target AMI.
development (HUD)
and adjust individual
incentives based on
target AMI. While
incentives may be
targeted based on
AMI, definitions
should be consistent.
2
Definitions
Remove ambiguous
A.2
Remove ambiguous
and conflicting
and conflicting
language from
language from
affordability related
affordability related
definitions.
definitions. For
example, revise
definitions to
distinguish Affordable
Workforce Housing
and Affordable
Housing. Review more
recent updates
contained in Appendix
J-Wynwood NRD-1
and apply across
Miami 21, as
appropriate.
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report Im
Appendices
Item #
Sub -Topic
Comment
Modifications
Recom
Recommendation
mendat
ion#
3
Density
Increase density in T4
A.37
Increase Density in T4
and T5 without
and T5 without
increasing building
increasing building
volume, especially
volume, especially
within TODs.
within TODs.
4
Density
Create density
A.58
Create Density
bonuses citywide for
bonuses citywide for
proximity.
proximity to Transit
Corridors and TODs
regardless of
proximity to T3.
5
Density
Double density
A.59
Enhance further
program critical for
double density
affordable housing
program that is critical
production and should
for Affordable
be further enhanced.
Housing production,
e.g., allow increase in
density to 500 du/acre
with the additional
increment to be all
affordable to have
permitting and impact
fees deferred, such as
25% of units at 75-
100%AMI. Also,
require annual review,
audit and report on
the City' s Public
Benefit Trust Fund.
Data should be
captured and made
available to study.
6
Density
Lodging should not be
A.38
Do not count Lodging
counted against
against residential
residential density.
Density. Lodging
should be limited by
FLR and minimum
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report M
Appendices
Item #
Sub -Topic
Comment
Modifications
Recom
Recommendation
mendat
ion#
lodging unit size in
Florida Building Code.
7
Density
Remove parametric
No agreed action or
density increases, as
recommendation
building volumes get
larger, density
shouldn' t
proportionally
increase so unit sizes
stay the same size.
8
Density
Allow additional
No agreed action or
density increases for
recommendation
development at the
minimum lot size.
9
Parking/Loading
Increase parking
A.3
Decrease parking
reductions.
requirements overall
to support the general
10
Parking/Loading
Parking reduction for
affordable units in any
provision of affordable
project.
housing.
11
Parking/Loading
Provide parking
AA
Provide parking
reductions to small
reductions for small
projects as the smaller
affordable housing
the project the more
projects, as the smaller
burdensome the
the project the more
parking requirements.
burdensome the
parking requirements.
12
Parking/Loading
Allow parking
A.5
Allow parking
reductions as of right
reductions as of right
for affordable housing
for Affordable
projects.
Housing projects.
13
Parking/Loading
Amend loading
No agreed action or
requirements,
recommendation
especially on a small
project.
14
Parking/Loading
Reduce 23' drive aisle
Reduce 23'
A.6
Reduce 23' drive aisle
standard.
drive aisle
standard to 20' ft
standard. 20'
minimum for 90
ft minimum for
degrees angle; 17' ft
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report Im
Appendices
Item #
Sub -Topic
Comment
Modifications
Recom
Recommendation
mendat
ion#
90 degrees
minimum for 60
angle; 17' ft
degrees angle and
minimum for
11' -12' ft minimum
60 degrees
for 45 degrees angle,
angle and
for all types of
11' -12' ft
projects.
minimum for
45 degrees
angle.
15
Parking/Loading
Allow compact car
Allow compact
A.7
Allow compact car
parking space size.
car parking
parking space size.
space size.
Miami Dade County
MDC standard
standard of 7.5' ft x
7.5' ftx15'
15' ftuptoa
ft maximum
maximum of 75% of
75%
the parking spaces
provided, for all types
of projects.
16
Parking/Loading
Allow loading docks to
A.8
Allow delivery vehicles
externally maneuver,
to externally maneuver
and enforce delivery
into loading docks,
hours as internal
and enforce delivery
maneuvering
hours, as internal
diminishes ground
maneuvering
floor active uses.
diminishes ground
floor active uses;
remove apron and
maneuverability
requirements, for all
types of projects. (See
Recommendation A.67
in 'Other' category
relating to the
enforcement of
Delivery Hours by the
Department of Street
Parking "DOSP" also
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report Im
Appendices
Item #
Sub -Topic
Comment
Modifications
Recom
Recommendation
mendat
ion#
known as the Miami
Parking Authority).
17
Parking/Loading
Allow on -street
Allow on -street
A.9
Allow on -street
loading up to a certain
loading up to a
loading up to a certain
unit count.
certain unit
unit count. Must be
count. Must
dedicated loading
dedicated
space.
loading space.
18
Parking/Loading
Reduce loading
Reduce
A.10
Reduce loading
requirements.
loading
requirements.
requirements.
Calculate loading
Based on
requirements based
habitable
on habitable space
space.
rather than current
gross area. Encourage
on -street loading;
eliminate onsite
loading in pedestrian -
oriented streets except
for large projects.
19
Parking/Loading
Allow development to
A.11
Allow centralized
utilize public parking
parking that
garages and on street
affordable housing
parking permits.
projects can utilize as
"off -site" parking.
20
Parking/Loading
Allow centralized
A.1.16
Allow centralized
parking that
parking that
affordable housing
affordable housing
projects can utilize.
projects can utilize.
21
TODs
Allow payment into
No agreed action or
the Transportation
recommendation
Trust Fund to extend
the TOD or Transit
Corridor boundary.
22
Parking/Loading
Increase square
Increase
A.12
Increase square
footage threshold for
square footage
footage threshold for
threshold for
small building parking
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report M1
Appendices
Item #
Sub -Topic
Comment
Modifications
Recom
Recommendation
mendat
ion#
small building parking
small building
exemption, (e.g. from
exemption.
parking
10,000 to 20,000 sf
exemption.20,0
habitable space.
00' sf
habitable
space
23
Parking/Loading
Provide different
Provide
No agreed action or
parking requirements
different
recommendation
for different sized
parking
units.
requirements
for different
sized units.
Interested in
looking at
MDC
standards.
Studio — 0
spaces
1 bedroom —1
space or .75
space
2 bedroom —
1.5 spaces or 1
space
3 bedroom —
1.75 spaces or
1.5 spaces
24
Parking/Loading
Encourage T3 street
A.35
Encourage T3 street
parking by resident
parking by resident
only permit at no cost
only permit at no cost,
to empower parking
to empower parking
reductions for other
reductions for other
transect zones with no
transect zones with no
concern for spillover
concern for spillover
parking.
parking.
25
Parking/Loading
Parking reductions
A.36
Do not require
should not be tied to
payment in lieu for
payment -in -lieu.
parking reductions.
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report Im
Appendices
Item #
Sub -Topic
Comment
Modifications
Recom
Recommendation
mendat
ion#
26
Building Design
Provide one story
Incorporate
No agreed action or
height bonus in T5 for
NRD provisions
recommendation
affordable housing.
across Miami
21, in order for
all to benefit
27
Building Design
Increase threshold for
Increase
A.15
Increase threshold for
cross -block
threshold for
cross -block
requirement.
cross -block
requirement to reflect
requirement.
median city block size.
should be
Eliminate cross -block
median city
requirement for
block size.
projects that do not
should only be
span an entire block
applied if it
(street to street),
goes all the
otherwise cross block
way across
connectivity should be
block (street to
considered a public
street), should
benefit.
be done as an
incentive, must
improve
connectivity.
28
Building Design
Decrease lot size
Decrease lot
No agreed action
minimums.
size minimums.
upon further
discussion this
was supposed
to be about the
maximums vs
minimums
29
Building Design
Decrease unit size
A.16
Remove minimum unit
minimums to be
and lot size
consistent with ADA or
requirements, other
FBC minimums.
than to be consistent
and compliant with
Americans with
Disabilities Act (ADA)
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report Im
Appendices
Item #
Sub -Topic
Comment
Modifications
Recom
Recommendation
mendat
ion#
and Florida Building
Code (FBC) minimums.
30
Building Design
Allow setback
A.39
Allow setback
flexibilities beyond
flexibilities beyond
10% Waiver for lots
10% Waiver for lots
below minimum lot
below minimum lot
size.
size. Allow
substandard size lots
to be approved with
Density allowed for
5,000 sf lot, with
setback and other
reductions.
31
Building Design
Allow microunits
A.17
Allow microunits
within Affordable
(under 400 sf) within
Housing projects
Affordable Housing
outside of TOD areas.
projects and other
potential development
incentives outside of
TOD areas, i.e.,
throughout T4, T5, and
T6.
32
Building Design
Eliminate lot area
A.40
Eliminate lot area
minimums and
minimums and
maximums for T4, T5,
maximums for T4, T5,
and T6.
and T6 up to T6-24.
33
Building Design
Eliminate floor plate
A.18
Eliminate floor plate
area and length
area and length
maximums.
maximums, for all
types of projects.
34
Building Design
Only required if above
A.19
Exclude balconies
item, No. 33 doesn' t
from floorplate
proceed. Exclude
maximums. (Only
balconies from
required if floor plate
floorplate maximums.
maximums are not
eliminated, as
recommended in item
A.18.)
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report Im
Appendices
Item #
Sub -Topic
Comment
Modifications
Recom
Recommendation
mendat
ion#
35
Building Design
Parking garage should
Parking garage
A.13
Maximize flat levels
maximize flat levels
should
and increase ceiling
and increase ceiling
maximize flat
heights of parking
heights.
levels and
structures to allow for
increase ceiling
future adaptive re -use.
heights.
36
Building Design
Reduce garage
A.14
Reduce garage
screening
screening
requirements for
requirements for
affordable housing.
Affordable Housing
projects, allowing
Administrative Review.
37
Policy
Create affordable
A.68
Create affordable
homeownership
homeownership
incentives.
incentives, prioritizing
workforce housing.
38
Policy
Protect single family
No agreed action or
neighborhoods.
recommendation
39
Policy
Provide a clear table in
A.1.31
Provide a clear table in
Miami 21 for
Miami 21 for
affordable housing
Affordable Housing
incentives.
incentives.
40
Policy
Affordable housing
A.43
Reduce Affordable
regulations should
Housing regulations
generally be reduced.
generally, including
eliminate Art in Public
Places and garage
liner requirements.
41
Policy
Article 2 should
No agreed action or
address gentrification.
recommendation
42
Policy
Encourage density
A.60
Encourage Density
along corridors.
along Transit
Corridors.
43
Policy
Add incentives to
A.63
Add incentives to
preserve naturally
preserve naturally
occurring affordable
occurring affordable
housing.
housing.
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report MI
Appendices
Item #
Sub -Topic
Comment
Modifications
Recom
Recommendation
mendat
ion#
44
Policy
Discourage property
A.22
Encourage and create
assembly.
flexibility in small scale
development
(consider a definition
for small scale
development).
45
Policy
Allow density to be
A.44
Consider in what
rounded up, not down.
circumstances Density
may be rounded up,
not down.
46
Policy
Future Land Use Map
A.41
Govern Density for
designation should
small sites according
govern density for
to the Future Land Use
small sites.
Map designation
47
Policy
Attainable -Mixed
No agreed action or
Income Ordinance
recommendation
should be further
enhanced.
48
Policy
SAP regulations
No agreed action or
should be improved.
recommendation
49
Policy
Smaller Waivers
No agreed action or
should be as of right,
recommendation
larger Waivers should
require public benefits.
5o
Policy
Define elements of
A.64
Through a
neighborhoods that
neighborhood
need to be preserved
planning process,
upon redevelopment,
define elements of
such as trees, typical
neighborhoods that
lot coverage, etc.)
need to be preserved
upon redevelopment,
such as trees, typical
lot coverage, etc.
51
Policy
Allow specialized T3
A.61
Create specialized T3
zoning that allows
zoning that allows
triplexes and
triplexes and
quadraplexes.
quadraplexes. Allow
T4 affordable housing
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report Im
Appendices
Item #
Sub -Topic
Comment
Modifications
Recom
Recommendation
mendat
ion#
abutting T3 to be
approved by
Exception.
52
Policy
Miami 21 should
Miami 21
A.62
Encourage a wider
encourage a wider
should
range of housing
range of housing
encourage a
types, e.g.T3-R allow
types.
wider range of
ancillary unit, T3-L
housing types.
allow duplexes, T3-0
T3-R allow
allow triplexes and
ancillary unit,
quadplexes.
T3-L allow
duplexes, T3-0
allow triplexes
and
quadplexes
53
External to M21
Miami 21 should have
A.42
Additional incentives
additional incentives
to renovate historic
to renovate historic
structures.
structures.
54
Policy
Decrease term of
A.69
Implement a shorter -
required affordability
term Affordable
covenant for smaller
Housing covenant of
projects.
less than 20 years in
smaller projects
(under 25 units) to
match the County
standard. e.g., in T4 or
T5, 15 years versus 30
years. The reduced
covenant length is
required as it caps
income for a period
thatexceeds
maintenance norms.
55
Policy
Create different
Create
A.23
Create different
standards for
different
standards for
adjoining conditions
standards for
adjoining and
across a shared
adjoining and
abutting conditions
- MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report M
Appendices
Item #
Sub -Topic
Comment
Modifications
Recom
Recommendation
mendat
ion#
property line and
abutting
(i.e. across a shared
abutting across a
conditions (i.e.
property line, across a
right-of-way.
across a shared
right-of-way or across
property line
a significant
and across a
geographic boundary
right-of-way.)
such as a water body,
for affordable
utility easement, or
housing, TODs,
interstate highway) for
setbacks, and
Affordable Housing,
public benefits.
TODs, setbacks, and
public benefits. Clarify
that distance should
be measured as the
actual walking
distance in feet, rather
than a simple i.e. this is
important for
calculating distance
from a TOD.
56
Policy
Micro -units should be
A.20
Allow micro -units in
allowed in senior
senior housing,
housing, regardless of
regardless of TOD
TOD proximity.
proximity.
57
Policy
Allow Planned Unit
Reintroduce
A.45
Reintroduce PUDs for
Developments in
PUDs for
archeological,
exchange for public
archeological,
geological, and
benefit agreements.
geological, and
environmental
environmental
purposes, precluding
purposes if it
change of zoning.
doesn' t cause
change of
zoning.
58
Policy
Allow density transfers
A.46
Allow Density transfers
along Transit
along Transit
Corridors, notjust
Corridors, notjust
TODs.
TODs, regardless of
different zoning
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report
Appendices
Item #
Sub -Topic
Comment
Modifications
Recom
Recommendation
mendat
ion#
transects. Increase
TOD and TC radius
distance from 1/4 to
1/3 mile.
59
Policy
Allow full range of
A.52
Allow full range of
TOD incentives in
TOD incentives in
Transit Corridors.
Transit Corridors.
60
Policy
Harmonize Miami 21
No agreed action or
with Public Works
recommendation
cross sections.
61
Policy
Remove work -live and
A.33
Remove work -live and
live -work definitions,
live -work definitions;
and benefits should be
extend uses to all
extended to all
multifamily housing.
multifamily housing.
62
Policy
Create incentives for
A.53
Create incentives for
small-scale
small-scale
development.
development, such as
waiving Waiver
process; expediting
permitting; reducing
plan deliverable
requirements; and
eliminating standard
comments. Also, allow
small sites (20,000 sf
maximum) in T5 and
T6 to develop without
parking, and to sell
unused density as a
market rate benefit, as
small sites cannot
achieve allowable
Density.
63
Policy
Demolition of usable
A.54
Discourage demolition
housing should be
of existing housing
discouraged.
product; for instance,
require development
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report
Appendices
Item #
Sub -Topic
Comment
Modifications
Recom
Recommendation
mendat
ion#
plans to permit
demolition, require
sod / landscaping for
empty lots, and
require maintenance
bond.
64
Process
Allow Exception with
A.48
Allow Commission
Commission approval
approval of Subsidy
for additional
Flexibilities through
flexibilities not
Exemption process for
currently allowed by
Affordable Housing.
Miami 21 to meet a
subsidy requirement.
65
Process
Allow a single
A.70
Allow a single
covenant to cover all
covenant to cover all
required commitments
required
for an affordable
commitments for an
housing project.
Affordable Housing
project, to coordinate
zoning, planning, and
housing department
requirements.
66
Process
Identify Waivers and
A.49
Identify Waivers and
Warrants to be as of
Warrants that should
right for small scale
be as by right for small
development.
scale development
and Affordable
Housing e.g. when
such Waivers and
Warrants do not
negatively impact
neighborhoods or
implement City-wide
priorities and
streamlining.
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report
Appendices
Item #
Sub -Topic
Comment
Modifications
Recom
Recommendation
mendat
ion#
67
External to M21
Remove code
A.50
Remove Code
requirements require
requirements that
nonstandard ROW
require nonstandard
improvement
ROW improvement
covenants, or make
covenants, or require
the requirements
standard
standard
improvements that do
improvements that do
not require the
not require the
covenants.
covenants.
68
Process
Rapidly issue small
A.71
Rapidly issue small
permits.
permits with minimal
deliverables relying on
design professionals.
69
Process
Prioritize affordable
A.72
Prioritize Affordable
housing permits.
Housing approvals
and permitting
Processes.
70
Process
Remove twice a year
A.24
Remove twice a year
rezoning cycle.
rezoning cycle and
allow rezoning
applications at any
time. Amend Chapter
62 accordingly.
71
Process
There should be
A.73
Provide dedicated City
dedicated city
reviewers for
reviewers for
Affordable Housing
affordable housing
projects, to
projects.
consolidate and
expedite
documentation
required and minimize
length of process.
72
Process
The City should have a
No agreed action or
catalogue of
recommendation
preapproved cookie -
cutter affordable
housing designs.
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report W
Appendices
Item #
Sub -Topic
Comment
Modifications
Recom
Recommendation
mendat
ion#
73
Process
The affordable
A.51
Expedite the
housing Warrant
Affordable Housing
process should be
Warrant process
sped up and
through concurrent
concurrently reviewed
review by Public
by building.
Works and Building
and review whether to
eliminate Affordable
Housing Warrant
requirement
altogether or in
specific locations, such
as T4.
74
Process
Establish reasonable,
A.25
Establish reasonable,
enforceable permit
enforceable permit
review timelines.
review timelines in
Article 7. e.g. Miami -
Dade County has a 21-
day review timeline.
City regulations,
deliverables and
processes should be
streamlined to allow
for reasonable
timelines.
75
Process
Remove the 40,000 sf
A.47
Remove the 40,000 sf
and 200 linear feet of
and 200 linear feet of
frontage requirement
Frontage requirement
for land use and
for land use and
zoning amendments.
zoning amendments.
76
Process
The signature
A.26
The signature
requirement of
requirement by
multiple City
multiple City
departments should
departments should
be removed for
be removed for all City
preapproved (to form
Attorney Office
and correctness)
approved templates
unities of title,
including unities of
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report Im
Appendices
Item #
Sub -Topic
Comment
Modifications
Recom
Recommendation
mendat
ion#
covenants in lieu,
title, covenants in lieu,
affordable housing
Affordable Housing
covenants, etc.
covenants. City should
designate one
reviewer to confirm
compliance of
required template and
deliverables.
77
Process
Improve and formalize
A.27
Improve and formalize
the preapplication
the preapplication
process.
process to provide a
weekly deadline,
written comments by
all reviewing
departments, and a
30-minute conference
with all reviewing
departments, like
Miami Dade County.
78
Process
Allow notification to
A.28
Notify abutting
abutting property
property owners
owners earlier in the
earlier in the process,
process to allow the
after the second cycle,
most time possible to
to allow the most time
receive community
possible to receive
feedback.
community feedback.
79
External to Miami
Get WASD on the
A.74
Include WASD in the
21
impact fee system.
City' s impact fee
system.
80
External to Miami
Have WASD fees
A.75
Reduce WASD fees to
21
covered by future
reflect smaller
water charges for a
property dimensions,
project.
and incorporate
WASD fees in future
water charges for a
project.
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report Im
Appendices
Item #
Sub -Topic
Comment
Modifications
Recom
Recommendation
mendat
ion#
81
External to Miami
Better use City public
A.76
Use City public land
21
land for affordable
for affordable housing.
housing.
82
External to Miami
Find alternative
A.77
Find alternative
21
funding source for
funding source for
infrastructure
infrastructure
improvements for
improvements for
small affordable
small affordable
housing projects.
housing projects.
83
External to Miami
Waive impact fees and
A.78
Waive impact fees and
21
permit fees for
permit fees for
affordable housing
Affordable Housing
developments.
developments,
including
infrastructure
improvements
required by Public
Works and WASD.
Also, eliminate Impact
Fee and Deferral Fee.
84
External to Miami
Create a process for
A.79
Review of the lien
21
special release of lien
process for special
and violations for
release of lien and
affordable housing
violations for
projects.
Affordable Housing
projects to see if they
can be mitigated at
the beginning of the
process, not the end.
e.g., release all liens on
property developing
affordable housing to
facilitate financing,
with contracts
requiring lien payment
if affordability is not
delivered.
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report
Appendices
Item #
Sub -Topic
Comment
Modifications
Recom
Recommendation
mendat
ion#
2. A RESOLUTION TO IDENTIFY HOW AMI IMPACTS SUPPLY AND DEMAND TO EFFECT MARKET RATE
HOUSING INTO THE MIAMI 21 AD HOC TASK FORCE REPORT
85
Policy
Calibrate incentives
A.55
Calibrate Affordable
based on AMI by
and Workforce
neighborhood.
Housing incentives
based on Area Median
Income by
neighborhood.
3. A RESOLUTION TO IDENTIFY DISCREPANY BETWEEN THE CITY AND COUNTY AMI IMPACT ON
AFFORDABLE UNITS INTO THE MIAMI 21 AD HOC TASK FORCE REPORT
86
External to Miami
The Housing and
A.80
The Housing and
21
Community
Community
Development
Development
certification process
certification process
should not assign
should not assign
specific unit AM Is and
specific unit AM Is and
sizes.
sizes.
4. A RESOLUTION TO IDENTIFY ADU POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS INTO THE MIAMI 21 AD HOC TASK
FORCE REPORT
87
External to Miami
The City should
A.81
Produce an ADU
21
produce an ADU
manual like the one
manual similar to
published by Santa
Santa Cruz, offering
Cruz, offering step by
step by step
step instructions.
instructions.
88
External to Miami
The City should offer
A.82
Offer City construction
21
financing for
financing for
affordable ADUs.
affordable ADUs.
89
External to Miami
Municode should link
21
directly to CodeHub.
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report Im
Appendices
Item #
Sub -Topic
Comment
Modifications
Recom
Recommendation
mendat
ion#
90
External to Miami
The City should
A.83
Advertise surplus City
21
advertise surplus land
land for Affordable
for affordable housing
Housing development.
development.
91
ADUs
Allow ADUs in all
A.65
Allow ADUs in all
Transect Zones.
Transect Zones.
92
ADUs
Allow ADUs in T3-R
Allow ADUs in
A.66
Allow ADUs in T3-R.
but only for lots 10,000
T3-R
sf or over.
93
ADUs
Allow multiple units in
No agreed action or
ADUs.
recommendation
94
ADUs
Allow setback
A.29
Allow setback
flexibilities for ADUs.
flexibilities for ADUs.
95
ADUs
Increase ADU
A.30
Increase ADU
maximum size.
maximum size.
96
ADUs
Provide more specific
A.31
Provide more specific
guidelines on
guidelines on
requirement that
requirement that
ADUs be
ADUs be
"architecturally
"architecturally
harmonious."
harmonious."
97
ADUs
Remove ADU parking
A.32
Remove ADU parking
requirement if transit
requirement if transit
is nearby or street
is nearby, or street
parking is available.
parking is available.
98
ADUs
Allow Illegal ADUs to
A.56
Allow illegal ADUs to
be legalized with an
be legalized through
affordability covenant.
the permitting process
with an affordability
covenant.
99
ADUs
In T3 in some areas,
Redundant
No agreed action or
ADUs should be
recommendation
allowed to house small
businesses.
100
ADUs
Model Citywide ADU
No agreed action
regulations after NRD-
2.
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report Im
Appendices
Item #
Sub -Topic
Comment
Modifications
Recom
Recommendation
mendat
ion#
101
ADUs
Allow Accessory
A.57
Allow Accessory
Commercial Units in
Commercial Units in
certain transect zones.
certain transect zones,
historic districts and
transition areas.
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report Im
Appendices
B. CLIMATE CHANGE AND RESILIENCY
1. A RESOLUTION TO INCORPORATE CLIMATE CHANGE AND RESILIENCY RECOMMENDATIONS INTO
THE MIAMI 21 AD HOC TASK FORCE REPORT
Item #
Sub -Topic
Comment
Modifications
Recom
Recommendations
mendat
ion#
102
Definitions
Define Green Roofs
B.1
Define Green Roofs
and Water
and Water
Conservation
Conservation Systems.
Systems.
103
Definitions
Define solar panels
B.2
Define solar panels
and other sustainable
and other sustainable
infrastructure.
infrastructure.
104
Building Design
Encourage ground
B.11
Encourage ground
floor building
floor building
functions that are
functions that are
protected from
protected from
flooding like
flooding like
commercial or
Commercial or
parking.
Parking.
105
Building Design
Require additional
B.18
Require additional on -
on -site storm water
site storm water
management for
management for
development.
development.
106
Building Design
Provide height
Provide height
B.3
Provide Height
flexibilities when
flexibilities
flexibilities when
resilience issues cause
when resilience
resilience issues cause
finished first floor
issues cause
finished first floor
elevations to rise.
finished first
elevations to rise.
floor elevations
Allow 25' ft height
to rise. Provide
for all ground floor
height
uses. See Section 3.5.2.
flexibilities
when resilience
issues cause
finished first
floor elevations
to rise. All
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report
Appendices
Item #
Sub -Topic
Comment
Modifications
Recom
Recommendations
mendat
ion#
ground floor
uses allowed
25' ftheight—
Section 3.5.2
107
Building Design
Allow for a "sacrificial"
Allow for a
B.12
Allow for a "sacrificial"
first story of
"sacrificial" first
first story of
development.
story of
development, e.g.,
development.
exclude first floor from
All ground
height regulations to
floor uses
allow flexible
allowed 25' ft
freeboard, or allow 25
height—
feet ground floor
Section 3.5.2 .
height with height
Permit a
measured from
sacrificial floor
highest point of
of
adjoining sidewalk.
development.
All ground
floor uses
allowed 25' ft
height —
Section 3.5.2
108
Building Design
Remove limitations
Modify the
BA
Modify the definition
on balconies as they
definition of
of Floor Plate to
are excellent passive
floor plate to
remove balconies and
shading devices to
remove
outdoor open space
reducing cooling
balconies from
amenities from this
energy expenditures.
this calculation
calculation.
109
Building Design
Require flat garage
Where feasible,
B.5
Incentivize flat garage
slabs to allow for the
require flat
slabs to allow for the
conversion of garage
garage slabs to
conversion of garage
space into other
allow for the
space into other
habitable uses.
conversion of
habitable uses, where
garage space
feasible.
into other
habitable uses.
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report Im
Appendices
Item #
Sub -Topic
Comment
Modifications
Recom
Recommendations
mendat
ion#
110
Building Design
Require a minimum
Require a
B.6
Incentivize a maximum
first floor height that
maximum first
first floor height that
will allow habitability
floor height
will allow habitability
with a new, higher
that will allow
with a future, higher
slab.
habitability
slab. All ground floor
with a new,
uses allowed 25' ft
higher slab. All
height —Section 3.5.2.
ground floor
If the Sidewalk
uses allowed
Elevation points vary
25' ftheight —
by more than 5 ft, the
Section 3.5.2 . If
building height shall
the Arg.
be measured from the
Sidewalk
highest point.
Elevation
points vary by
more than 5 ft,
the building
height shall be
measured from
the highest
point.
111
Policy
Freeboard regulations
B.7
Apply freeboard
should apply citywide
regulations citywide to
to anticipate longer
anticipate longer -term
term sea level rise.
sea -level rise.
112
Policy
Align Miami 21
B.13
Align Miami 21
regulations around
regulations with the
the flood plane.
FEMA Flood Zone
Designations and
Definitions.
113
Policy
LEED requirement
No agreed action or
should be higher than
recommendation
silver for larger
projects.
114
Policy
Riverfront properties
B.8
Require native
that do not require a
plantings for riverfront
river walk should be
properties that do not
require a river walk.
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report Im
Appendices
Item #
Sub -Topic
Comment
Modifications
Recom
Recommendations
mendat
ion#
required to provide
native plantings.
115
Policy
Seawall contributions
Amend section
B.19
Amend Section 3.14 of
should be counted
3.1.4 of Miami
Miami 21 Public
towards a project's
21 Public
Benefits to include
public benefits.
Benefits to
seawall and other
include seawall
resiliency
contribution
contributions towards
towards public
Public Benefits.
benefits and
Amend to incorporate
include
credit in lieu of road
transition
impact fees.
space from one
property to
POW.
Amendment to
Incorporate
credit in lieu of
road impact
feesforthe
issues of
transition
116
Policy
Up zone areas that
No agreed
are the most
recommendation
protected from sea
level rise.
117
Policy
Provide additional
Provide
B.9
Provide additional
incentives for
additional
incentives for Adaptive
adaptive reuse.
incentives for
Use Buildings: 5%
adaptive reuse.
increase or up to 500
5% increase or
sq ft in additional Lot
up to 500 sgft
Coverage with Waiver;
in lot coverage
up to 50% increase in
with waiver. Up
Floor Area with the
to 50%
same Building
increase in
footprint with no
floor area with
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report Im
Appendices
Item #
Sub -Topic
Comment
Modifications
Recom
Recommendations
mendat
ion#
the same
additional
building
requirements.
footprint with
no additional
requirements.
118
Process
Create a TDR
B.21
Create a TDR program
program for
for properties that will
properties that will
eventually become
eventually become
uninhabitable due to
uninhabitable due to
sea level rise.
sea level rise.
119
Landscape
Enhance tree planting
B.10
Enhance tree planting
requirements with a
requirements with a
higher number of
higher number of
required trees and a
required trees and a
higher DBH
higher DBH
requirement.
requirement. Apply
tree protection fund
proceeds to all
resiliency measures.
120
Landscape
Require street tree
B.14
Require street tree
plantings at back of
plantings at back of
curb.
curb.
121
Landscape
Allow green roofs to
Allow green
B.15
Allow green roof to
substitute for some
roof to
substitute part of the
required ground floor
substitute part
Green Space
landscaping.
of the green
requirement.
space
requirement
122
Landscape
Increase the
Planning
B.22
Planning Department
percentage of native
Department
shall provide number
and drought tolerant
shall provide
and recommendations
plants required by the
number and
for increases in
code.
recommendati
percentages of native
ons
and drought tolerant
plants.
123
External to Miami
Establish countywide
B.23
Establish countywide
21
Base Flood Elevation.
Base Flood Elevation.
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report Im
Appendices
Item #
Sub -Topic
Comment
Modifications
Recom
Recommendations
mendat
ion#
124
External to Miami
Add leaf protection to
B.24
Add leaf protection to
21
storm water
storm water
infrastructure and run
infrastructure and run
street sweepers more
street sweepers more
often.
often.
125
External to Miami
Improve upstream
B.25
Improve upstream
21
water retention.
water retention.
126
External to Miami
Reduce fees and taxes
B.26
Reduce fees and taxes
21
for resilience
for resilience
measures.
measures.
127
External to Miami
Map curb and gutter
B.27
Map curb and gutter
22
conditions citywide.
conditions citywide.
128
Sustainability
LEED sustainability
B.16
Codify in one location
requirements in M21
in the City Ordinance a
are not working
consolidated
because the city lacks
sustainability and
sustainability and
resilience policy.
resilience policies.
Additionally, update
There is no data
Miami 21 or introduce
regarding LEED.
an entirely new section
to ensure Miami 21
reflects and supports
129
Sustainability
The City shall
consider some
the implementation of
permitting fees or
the policy.
impact fee for
buildings moving
towards sustainability.
130
Sustainability
The LEED aspects of
B.17
Incentivize
M21 have been on
development pursuant
hold because they
to LEED or green
have been difficult to
building certification
use, or they have not
process and leave that
been working out.
in 3.14 of Miami 21 but
remove overall policy
into the City Code.
131
Sustainability
LEED is beyond code
and it is an unfunded
mandate. It should be
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report Im
Appendices
Item #
Sub -Topic
Comment
Modifications
Recom
Recommendations
mendat
ion#
mandatory instead of
voluntary.
132
Sustainability
LEED is written for
temperate North
America, and in most
parts of USA you can
use the sun to help
heat your building
but in Miami we need
to use the sun to cool
our building.
133
Sustainability
We have extreme
local issues that must
be solved that are not
addressed by LEED.
However, there are
polices and initiatives
that might work
towards solving these
issues.
134
External to M21
The Public Works and
B.28
Consolidate policy to
Resiliency
encourage the
department shall
prioritization of
work together with
conservation. The
the Climate Change
Public Works and
and Resiliency task
Resiliency department
force to consolidate a
shall work together
policy to encourage
with the Climate
the prioritization of
Change and Resiliency
energy.
task force. The policy
shall include a
monetary assessment
and it shall be updated
every 3 years.
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report
Appendices
C. QUALITY OF LIFE
1. A RESOLUTION TO INCORPORATE REVIEW OF MIAMI 21 ATLAS EVALUATION FOR DEVELOPMENT
DIRECTION OF CITY NEIGHBORHOODS AND IMPROPER ABUTTING TRANSECTS RECOMMENDATIONS
INTO THE MIAMI 21 AD HOC TASK FORCE REPORT
Item #
Sub -Topic
Comment
Modifications
Recom
Recommendations
mendat
ion#
135
Rezone
Improper zoning:
C.10
Amend Article 7,
Process/Atlas
Miami 21 rezoned all
Miami 21 to allow for
areas ignoring
the property owners
owner' s interest.
with "bifurcated
zoning" to request
136
Rezone
Some
consistent zoning
Process/Atlas
areas/properties have
based on ownership,
the same use and
use, historic
same owner but
designation, or
where designated
building sites as of
different zones by
2010.
Miami 21.
137
Rezone
Miami 21 allows for
Process/Atlas
the process but there
is no application
process per the
section.
138
Rezone
Lots have been
Process/Atlas
bifurcated zoning.
139
Rezone
Takeinto
Process/Atlas
consideration historic
use.
140
Neighborhood
Neighborhoods must
Outreach
be informed
regarding the
different zones and
the importance/
purpose of why there
are certain zones
abutting.
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report Im
Appendices
Item #
Sub -Topic
Comment
Modifications
Recom
Recommendations
mendat
ion#
141
Corridor Zoning
Corridors should be
C.18
Amend Article 2,
the edge of the
2.1.3.2 and Article 7,
neighborhoods
7.1.2.8.f to establish
instead of the
"Guidelines for Urban
center.
Form" where Transit
Corridors form
physical boundaries of
neighborhoods with
142
Corridor Zoning
Corridors with alley
activity nodes at the
can be up zoned.
intersections and
143
Corridor Zoning
Up zone smaller
higher densities being
density areas that are
located at the
abutting areas with
periphery and
more density (T6,
transition to lower
etc.)
densities in the
interior.
144
Rezone Process
Creative solutions to
C.1
Amend Article 7,
allow smaller lots to
7.1.2.8.a to allow
be developed.
greater rezone
flexibility from T3 to T4
145
Rezone Process
T3s in between T6-8.
T3 will not qualify to
when abutting T6, that
be up zoned to T6;
would result in a more
however, it may
favorable successional
qualify to be up
outcome in cases
zoned to T4.
where the applicant
does not have 40,000
sf or 200' of linear
frontage (see also
A.1.61 and C.1.5).
146
Rezone Process
Developers are up
C.11
Amend Article 7,
zoning due to the use
7.1.2.6 to allow
instead of up zoning
approval of a
due to new
Conditional Use not
construction or
otherwise permitted,
volume change.
including parking, by
Exception.
147
Rezone Process
Conditional use
permit.
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report Im
Appendices
Item #
Sub -Topic
Comment
Modifications
Recom
Recommendations
mendat
ion#
148
Rezone Process
Create an overlay to
allow for parking.
149
Rezone Process
Allow a transition
C.12
Amend Article 7,
zone based on
7.1.2.8.a to allow
historical use of
exception to
property
Successional Zoning
ownership, to accom
for a Land Use Plan
modate the
Amendment and/or
allowances to a
Rezoning
transition
to accommodate a
zone, and exception p
transition zone. Allow
rocess to allow
exception to the
fora specific use in
rezoning criteria,
the same transect
40,000 square
zones before.
feet, 200 feet of linear
frontage.
150
Rezone
Expedited process for
C.13
Follow platted tract
Process/Atlas
property owners with
lines, conduct a search
bifurcated zoning.
with the City Clerk to
clarify bifurcation -
historical background,
and amend Art.2 to
allow correction of the
Zoning Atlas.
Suggested eighteen -
month deadline.
151
Rezone
Strengthen Article
C.14
Conduct an outreach
Process/Atlas
#2.
process neighborhood
by neighborhood to
discuss changes done
to the zoning atlas
between 2008 and
2010. Suggested
eighteen -month
deadline.
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report Im
Appendices
Item #
Sub -Topic
Comment
Modifications
Recom
Recommendations
mendat
ion#
2. A RESOLUTION TO INCORPORATE EXISTING AND FUTURE MASTER PLAN RECOMMENDATIONS
INTO THE MIAMI 21 AD HOC TASK FORCE REPORT
152
Enforcement
Master plan should
C.15
Amend Article 3,
be enforceable.
Section 3.12 to
provide what design
guidelines and master
plans are enforceable
153
Enforcement
Guarantee neighbors
to include what they
as regulations to
are asking for.
ensure compatibility
with neighborhoods,
154
Enforcement
Affordable housing
should be on site.
such that guidelines
155
Neighborhood
Master plans must be
allow flexibility for
Compatibility
compatible with the
compatibility.
neighborhoods.
156
Enforcement
Master plans are
meant to be
regulations.
3. A RESOLUTION OF THE MIAMI 21 AD HOC TASK FORCE COMMITTEE ("MIAMI 21 TASK
FORCE") RECOMMENDING APPROVAL TO INCORPORATE DEVELOPMENT IMPACT ON
MINORITY AND LOCAL COMMUNITY RECOMMENDATIONS INTO THE MIAMI 21 AD HOC TASK
FORCE REPORT.
157
Neighborhood
Compatibility
Lack of compatibility
with neighborhoods.
158
Neighborhood
Gentrification, traffic,
C.21
City Commission
Compatibility
and displacement.
should define
"Minority
Communities" and
allocate resources to
study any
discriminatory effects
and identify fixes
(including those
relating to zoning).
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report
Appendices
Item #
Sub -Topic
Comment
Modifications
Recom
Recommendations
mendat
ion#
4. A RESOLUTION TO INCORPORATE SAP ISSUE RECOMMENDATIONS INTO THE MIAMI 21 AD HOC
TASK FORCE REPORT
159
Neighborhood
SAP: increase the
Compatibility
density and intensity
not included.
160
Neighborhood
Areas that have the
C.16
Amend Article 3,
Compatibility/Pub
acreage to create an
Section 3.9 and Article
lic Benefits
SAP should rewrite
7, Section 7.1.2.8.f.2 to
their development
encourage areas that
agreement with the
have the acreage to
city to provide what
create a SAP, and
the surrounding
address the following
neighborhoods need.
community issues:
• Uses such as grocers
in food desert, open
space, etc.
• Resilience, service by
transit, and service to
neighborhoods
around them
• Address
161
Neighborhood
Food desert, open
Compatibility/Pub
space, etc.
displacement and
lic Benefits
gentrification.
• Streetscapes
162
Neighborhood
Resilient areas, well
Compatibility/Pub
served by transit, and
• Transportation and
lic Benefits
serve neighborhoods
Transit
around them -avoid
Require that the SAP
163
Neighborhood
displacement and
conceptual plan,
Compatibility/Pub
gentrification
regulating plan, and
lic Benefits
development
164
Neighborhood
agreement address
Compatibility/Pub
surrounding
lic Benefits
neighborhoods'
165
Neighborhood
needs as expressed in
Compatibility/Pub
community outreach.
lic Benefits
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report Im
Appendices
Item #
Sub -Topic
Comment
Modifications
Recom
Recommendations
mendat
ion#
166
Rezone/Process
SAPS to up zone and
C.17
Amend Article 3,
SAPS to improve the
Section 3.9 and Article
area:
7, Section 7.1.2.8.f.2 to
establish SAP criteria
167
Rezone/Process
SAP process to
for site master
update streetscapes
planning and
or consolidate
development flexibility
building should be an
vs rezone request.
easier process.
flexibility vs rezone
168
Rezone/Process
There should be a
request.
different process for
SAP -up zoning.
169
Rezone/Process
Additional criteria
C.2
Amend Article 3,
should be added into
Section 3.9 and Article
the SAP process.
7, Section 7.1.2.8.f.2 to
require that additional
170
Process
Additional reports
and information
background
regarding existing
information be
uses,
provided on existing
relocation, scenarios,
neighborhood
etc.
conditions.
171
Neighborhood
Concentration of
Compatibility/Co
SAPS in some areas is
mmunity
concerning.
Engagement
172
Neighborhood
Communities and
Compatibility/Co
neighborhoods are
mmunity
left to their own
Engagement
devices to inform
themselves.
The city should offer
a list of community
requirements to
agree upon.
173
Transportation
SAP: nothing changes
C.3
Amend Article 3,
around these.
Section 3.9 and Article
7, Section 7.1.2.8.f.2 to
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report Im
Appendices
Item #
Sub -Topic
Comment
Modifications
Recom
Recommendations
mendat
ion#
174
Transportation
Transportation option
require an
s do not improve and
independent traffic
traffic increases.
study for SAP
applications..
175
Enforcement/Proc
SAP: not in
C.19
Establish that SAP
ess
compliance with what
Development
was approved.
Agreements must be
enforced via City Code
176
Enforcement/Proc
Improve process to
ess
help alleviate some of
Enforcement process.
the issues that arise
with SAPS.
177
Community
No code requirement
CA
Amend Article 3,
Engagement
to have community
Section 3.9 and Article
meetings.
7, Section 7.1.2.8.c.2 to
require Community
178
Community
There are no
Engagement
community meetings
Workshop prior to
required by the City.
PZAB notice.
No city sponsored
meeting/workshop.
179
Community
Sunshine noticed
Engagement
community meeting
must be required
prior to beginning
the Public Hearing
process.
180
Community
SAPS should be
C.5 and
Amend Article 3,
Engagement
compatible with the
C.6
Section 3.9 and Article
neighborhood.
7, Section 7.1.2.8.f.2 to
require a higher level
181
Community
Neighborhood
Engagement
oriented to
of community
encourage
engagement.
community support.
Create and maintain a
182
Community
Community
Engagement
engagement in the
City list of
SAP process.
neighborhood
priorities to encourage
private investment in
public benefit projects.
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report MI
Appendices
Item #
Sub -Topic
Comment
Modifications
Recom
mendat
ion#
Recommendations
183
Process
Incorporate NRD and
C.7
Amend Article 3,
NCD process into the
Section 3.9 to include
SAP.
criteria from Section
3.12.3.
184
Public Benefits
Community benefits
to be applied within
the SAP instead of
being used towards
other buildings or
public benefits.
5. A RESOLUTION TO INCORPORATE PARKING REQUIREMENT RECOMMENDATIONS INTO THE MIAMI
21 AD HOC TASK FORCE REPORT
185
Standards
Decrease parking
C.8
Amend Article 4, Table
requirements and
4 - Density, Intensity
loading berths —for
and Parking and Table
pedestrian scale,
5 Building Function:
quality of life,
Parking and Loading,
resiliency, and
to allow shared -use
affordable housing.
factor for loading and
loading berth size
186
Standards
Allow compact cars in
parking requirements
exchanges by right
to provide variety and
(eliminating Waiver).
utilize spaces that do
not fit "universal
size" .
187
Standards
Prohibit parking
reductions near T3
except in T3
neighborhoods with
curbs if residential
parking permits
adopted.
188
Standards
Allow parking
reduction within 500
ft of a TOD.
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report Im
Appendices
Item #
Sub -Topic
Comment
Modifications
Recom
Recommendations
mendat
ion#
189
Standards
Amend Article 4,
Table 5 (Shared
Parking Standards) to
allow all International
Traffic Engineer land
use codes.
190
Standards
Amend Article 4,
Table to allow shared
loading and
exchange of loading
berth size by right.
191
Standards
Flexibility for small
C.9
Amend Article 5 to
developments on
exempt small
small lots.
developments of
20,000 sf of Floor Area
192
Standards
Use on street loading
or less from on -site
zone or the architect
loading requirements,
can decide what
and to allow on -street
accommodates best
loading areas. This
to the project.
may require
coordination with
Public Works).
193
Standards
Parking guidelines
and standards should
be updated.
194
Standards
Outdoor space
should be activated.
6. A RESOLUTION TO INCORPORATE PRESERVATION OF SINGLE-FAMILY NEIGHBORHOOD
RECOMMENDATIONS INTO THE MIAMI 21 AD HOC TASK FORCE REPORT
195
Impact on
C.20
Engage a consultant to
Minority and Local
create a uniform traffic
Community
methodology and
regulations for City
neighborhoods. The
traffic consultant
should study the city
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report Im
Appendices
Item #
Sub -Topic
Comment
Modifications
Recom
Recommendations
mendat
ion#
neighborhood by
neighborhood to
analyze what traffic
calming devices are
most suitable.
196
Impact on
C.21
City Commission
Minority and Local
should define
Community
"Minority
Communities" and
allocate resources to
study any
discriminatory effects
and identify fixes
(including those
relating to zoning).
197
Impact on
C.22
Create a pilot program
Minority and Local
to legalize and keep
Community
track of ADUs and if a
developer/owner has
more than one ADU,
the additional units
must be affordable.
The Planning
Department shall
create a list with the
criteria. This program
shall be applicable
only in certain areas
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report
Appendices
D. PROSPERITY
I. A RESOLUTION OF THE MIAMI 21 AD HOC TASK FORCE COMMITTEE
("MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE") RECOMMENDING APPROVAL TO INCORPORATE EFFECTS OF
TRANSPORTATION RECOMMENDATIONS INTO THE MIAMI 21 AD HOC TASK FORCE REPORT
Item #
Sub -topic
Comment
Modifications
Recom
Recommendations
mendat
ion#
198
Effects on
Developers
DA
Work with Public
Transportation
encounter several
Works and Planning
difficulties when
Department to
trying to improve
eliminate Article 8,
public transportation
consider creating a
system due to
sub -section under
multijurisdictional
section #52 or section
laws and regulations
#62 regarding ROW
among the different
enhancement.
roads (county and
city).
199
Effects on
Cross sections,
Transportation
standards and proper
coordination should
be approved by the
Public Works
department and
evolved and
coordinating with
Planning.
200
Effects on
Article 8 leads to
Transportation
interjurisdictional
conflict between
Planning and Public
Works. Article 8
should be removed
and references to
proper Public Works
manual cross -
sections should be
incorporated.
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report Im
Appendices
Item #
Sub -topic
Comment
Modifications
Recom
Recommendations
mendat
ion#
201
Effects on
Article 8 should not
Transportation
be removed but its
language should be
modified to become
aspirational instead
of regulatory.
202
Effects on
Responsibilities for
Transportation
Public Right of Way
should belong to
Public Works.
203
Effects on
Public Works
Transportation
standards and Article
8 are not compatible.
Advocacy efforts
should be handled
primarily by Public
Works.
204
Effects on
The planning
Transportation
Department should
designate staff to
handle streets,
mobility,
205
Effects on
Remove Article 8 but
Transportation
create a task force on
Public Works and
Planning and create a
set of guidelines.
206
Effects on
Public Works should
Transportation
have transportation
planner or traffic
engineer.
207
Effects on
Credit of Lieu should
D.5
Analyze traffic
Transportation
be applicable for
improvements that
impact fees.
can be proffered by
the developer in
connection with the
development of the
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report Im
Appendices
Item #
Sub -topic
Comment
Modifications
Recom
Recommendations
mendat
ion#
site as Credit In lieu of
Road Impact Fees.
208
Effects on
D.6
Create an Impact Fee
Transportation
Credit process that is
transparent for new
business owners and
residents.
209
Effects on
D.7
Add a Transportation
Transportation
Planner to Planning
reviews to work
neighborhood by
neighborhood.
210
Effects on
D.8
Publish an impact fee
Transportation
schedule for public
view.
211
Effects on
The city should create
D.9
Create a set of
Transportation
a list of
standards
requirements/options
neighborhood by
(e.g. traffic lights) that
neighborhood that
allows the developer
allows the developer
to acquire Impact Fee
to acquire Impact Fee
credit if the developer
credit if the developer
complies with one or
complies with one or
more of these.
more of these.
212
Effects on
Park impact fees
Transportation
should be studied to
reduced residential
fees associated with
parks.
2. A RESOLUTION OF THE MIAMI 21 AD HOC TASK FORCE COMMITTEE
("MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE") RECOMMENDING APPROVAL TO CREATE ACTIVITY NODES AT
MAJOR THOROUGHFARE INTERSECTIONS RECOMMENDATIONS INTO THE MIAMI 21 AD HOC TASK
FORCE REPORT
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report Im
Appendices
Item #
Sub -topic
Comment
Modifications
Recom
mendat
ion#
Recommendations
213
Active Nodes
This topic should be
D.3
Define "Activity
defined further.
Nodes' and provide
a comprehensive study
on where these nodes
are, where they should
be, and how many
there are.
3. A RESOLUTION OF THE MIAMI 21 AD HOC TASK FORCE COMMITTEE
("MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE") RECOMMENDING APPROVAL TO CREATE OPPORTUNTY
ZONES INCENTIVE RECOMMENDATIONS INTO THE MIAMI 21 AD HOC TASK FORCE REPORT
214
Opportunity
Coordinate zooning
Zones
with federal policy
roles in a way that the
city can take ideas
from it.
215
Opportunity
Review process for "
Zones
opportunity zones"
should be expedited.
216
Opportunity
The city needs to
Zones
work with the zoning
code and
transportation system
to make
projects within oppor
tunity ones more
feasible.
217
Opportunity
There is
Zones
disinvestment in
opportunity zones
with zoning
designation that does
not work.
218
Opportunity
Certain categories are
Zones
not working
especially regarding T
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report M
Appendices
Item #
Sub -topic
Comment
Modifications
Recom
mendat
ion#
Recommendations
4, T5, and T6 that are
nearby T3.
219
Opportunity
Water and Sewer
Zones
requirements
desensitize
development. The
city should work with
the county to bring
infrastructure to
opportunity zone
areas.
4. A RESOLUTION OF THE MIAMI 21 AD HOC TASK FORCE COMMITTEE
("MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE") RECOMMENDING APPROVAL TO CREATE TECHNOLOGY -BASED
ECONOMY INCENTIVES RECOMMENDATIONS INTO THE MIAMI 21 AD HOC TASK FORCE REPORT
220
Definitions
There should be
D.1
Create new Use
some flexibility or re-
Definitions to allow for
definition of
low -impact industrial
industrial uses. There
uses in commercial
are industries that are
zoning, to be part of
compatible with the
mixed -use "15-
neighborhoods and
minute city."
should be allowed to
operate within the
city. For example,
industries that use 3D
printers, these are not
disturbing (noise) and
might not require
large lots. Industries
without big
machinery and with a
commercial
component.
221
Uses
If the city allows for
D.2
Define and allow City -
certain industrial
wide a Use codified in
uses, it can be a "15
NRD-1 called:
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report Is
Appendices
Item #
Sub -topic
Comment
Modifications
Recom
Recommendations
mendat
ion#
min City" and it will
Manufacturing
be promoting
Neighborhood Retail.
investment and
development.
222
Uses
There should be
some consideration
for zoning that
encourages makers
space that are not
disruptive (e.g. Red
hook, Brooklyn).
223
Uses
Boundaries,
guidelines should
be established when
adding new industrial
projects within
residential
neighborhoods.
5. A RESOLUTION OF THE MIAMI 21 AD HOC TASK FORCE COMMITTEE
("MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE") RECOMMENDING APPROVAL TO CREATE EDUCATIONAL POLICY
RECOMMENDATIONS INTO THE MIAMI 21 AD HOC TASK FORCE REPORT
224
Education
As the number of
D.5.1
Negotiate with MDC
schools are
Public Schools for
increasing and
access to use of funds.
growth in education
is happening, then
the proper
coordination must be
done for pick up
and drop offs as well
as traffic analysis and
forecast to affirm it
would not affect the
neighborhoods.
225
Education
Rehabilitation plans
required when
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report Im
Appendices
Item #
Sub -topic
Comment
Modifications
Recom
Recommendations
mendat
ion#
schools are falling
apart.
226
Education
Some students
cannot afford public
transportation and
parents don' t own a
vehicle. Meaning
these children would
need to walk. How
can the city help?
How do we solve this
issue?
227
Education
Trolley system does
not offer good
viability. The trolley
system is limited and
poorly managed.
228
Education
Transportation
planner should
coordinate with
schools to check on
requirements for
moving through the
site, etc.
229
Education
Projects should not
D.10
Review Certificate of
be required to do a
use fee schedule and
liner where there is an
provide cost -saving
obstruction for noise
options, such as
and if the value of the
allowing credit
construction is not
transfers from existing
worth it.
uses, with only new
uses incurring fees.
230
Education
Certificate of Use:
new CU should not
be required when
there is a new tenant
with the same use.
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report M1
Appendices
E. SERVICE
1. A RESOLUTION OF THE MIAMI 21 AD HOC TASK FORCE COMMITTEE
("MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE") RECOMMENDING APPROVAL TO ESTABLISH PROCESS AND LENGTH OF
PERMIT RECOMMENDATIONS INTO THE MIAMI 21 AD HOC TASK FORCE REPORT.
Item #
Sub -topic
Comment
Modifications
Recom
Recommendations
mendat
ion#
231
Process and Length
Miami 21 has not
E.1
Update Article 7 to
of permit
been updated
reflect ePlan, remove
with ePlan nor the a
NET
mount of human
offices, and update not
resources required
icing process.
to deal with the
number of permits
received.
232
Process and Length
Time frames are not
of permit
illustrated for
different type of
applications. Time
frames should be
codified, this will
allow to visualize
how many people
should be hired to
meet these time
frame
requirements.
233
Process and Length
Zoning and member
of permit
s of the task force
committee
must provide a list of
waivers to be
removed.
234
Process and Length
There is no process
of permit
memorialized. The
city should provide
information
regarding the
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report Im
Appendices
Item #
Sub -topic
Comment
Modifications
Recom
Recommendations
mendat
ion#
process that an
application must go
through
to apply to a public
hearing.
235
Service
Some waivers shall
E.17
Remove unnecessary
be removed. They
Waivers:
are unnecessary.
• Parking reduction
for elderly housing or
adaptive reuse.
-Dominant Setbacks.
• Shared access in
adjoining lots.
• Remove parking
requirements in TODs
236
Service
Waiver: relaxation of
setbacks needs to
be re -written.
237
Service
Otherwaivers
that require further
discussion:
Allow barbed wire
(D1, D2, and D3),
review within the
NCDs, relaxation
forsetbacks
required off street
parking for
preservation of a
natural feature, 30%
parking reduction
for TOD, reduction
for setbacks for one-
story uninhabitable.
238
Service
Modify Reduction of
E.22
Reduce setbacks and
setbacks waiver. It
allow greater flexibility
shall include "layers
within the setbacks for
and setbacks"
one-story, non-
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report C3
Appendices
Item #
Sub -topic
Comment
Modifications
Recom
Recommendations
mendat
ion#
habitable accessory
structures in T3. See
Section 5.3.1.H.
239
Service
Modify waiver:
E.18
Expand Waivers to
Encroachment of
include resiliency such
stairs and ramps into
as: allowing stairs to
the setback for
encroach 50% of
existing buildings
depth of first layer;
being raised above
eliminating loading
the Base Flood
berth substitution
Elevation plus
waiver requirements;
Freeboard.
increasing waiver
extent to 30% in TOD
areas; exchanging
requirements of waiver
for parking screening
above first floor with
Planning Director
review.
240
Service
Waivers to remove
241
Service
Waivers to remove
E.9
Substitute Loading
Spaces (Article 4, Table
5), such as allowing
substitutions of
Residential for
Commercial spaces by
Right.
242
Service
Waivers to remove
E.10
Adjust encroachment
of mechanical
equipment, such as air
conditioning units,
pumps, exhaust fans
or other similar noise
producing equipment
for existing Buildings
(Article 5,
Sections 5.3.2.d
and 5.4.2.d), e.g., allow
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report Im
Appendices
Item #
Sub -topic
Comment
Modifications
Recom
Recommendations
mendat
ion#
encroachments into
setbacks by requiring
energy and ambient
efficiency.
243
Service
Waivers to remove
E.11
Adjust service and
parking access from
Principal Frontage
(Article 5, Sections
5.4.2.e, 5.5.2.e
and 5.6.2.f), i.e.,
eliminate Waiver when
only one frontage
exists.
244
Service
Waivers to remove
E.12
Adjust pedestrian and
vehicular entry
spacing. (Article 5,
Section 5.5.1.f, 5.5.4.e,
5.6.1.f and 5.6.4.g) to
allow entries up to
four lanes wide, 12
feet each lane, and
allow delivery / drop-
off lay-bys.
245
Service
Waivers to remove
E.13
Adjust Building
Disposition in Cl.
(Article 5,
Section 5.7.2.4.d).
246
Service
Waivers to remove
E.19
Adjust Principal and
Secondary Frontage
Parking placement
(Article 5,
Sections 5.5.4.d,
5.5.4.e, 5.6.4.d
and 5.6.4.e) and
convert this into a "By
Right"
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report MI
Appendices
Item #
Sub -topic
Comment
Modifications
Recom
Recommendations
mendat
ion#
247
Service
Waivers to remove
E.14
Reduction of reservoir
parking space
requirement (Article 6).
248
Service
Waivers to remove
E.2
Replacement or
reconstruction of a
nonconforming
Structure (other than
Single -Family, duplex
or Multi -Family)
destroyed by natural
disaster, explosion,
fire, act of God, or the
public enemy without
a Waiver. (Article 7,
Section 7.2.2.b).
249
Service
Waivers to remove
E.20
Modify Article 7
Section (29) to be
granted
"administratively" .
2. A RESOLUTION OF THE MIAMI 21 AD HOC TASK FORCE COMMITTEE
("MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE") RECOMMENDING APPROVAL TO EVALUALUATE GENERAL ISSUES
WITH MIAMI 21
250
General Issues
Some applications
E.28
Consider accepting
are reviewed by
review by a private
planning and zoning
provider applicable to
twice, during the
the zoning process.
entitlement process
and then during the
building permitting
process. There
should not be a
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report Im
Appendices
Item #
Sub -topic
Comment
Modifications
Recom
Recommendations
mendat
ion#
need to have an
application reviewed
twice by the same
departments.
251
General Issues
Certain conditional
E.23
Section 3.6.1(e) -
uses shall be
existing surface lot - to
allowed on certain
allow for conditional
exceptions. These
use through an
shall not go through
Exception process
a rezoning process
rather than re -zoning
but a conditional
process.
use process.
o Conditional use
by exception.
o Rezoning usually
are for use instead
for capacity.
252
General Issues
E.15
Change section
7.1.3.2.7 and remove
the 3-acre minimum
requirement for a
phased project.
253
General Issues
GIS Map: include
layers that have
the 4-
year recertification.
254
General Issues
Inconsistency with
E.24
Review inconsistency
NCD3 and Miami 21
between NCD3 and
- Building heights
Miami 21- Building
should be measured
Heights should be
to the eaves, not
measured to the eaves
midpoint of pitched
(Miami 21), not
roof, which
midpoint of pitched
encourages flat
roof (NCD3), which
roofs, low pitches
encourages flat roofs,
and compressed
low pitches to avoid
ceiling heights
compressed ceiling
heights.
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report Im
Appendices
Item #
Sub -topic
Comment
Modifications
Recom
Recommendations
mendat
ion#
3. A RESOLUTION OF THE MIAMI 21 AD HOC TASK FORCE COMMITTEE
("MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE") RECOMMENDING TO EVALUATE THE NAVIGABILITY AND USABILITY
OF MIAMI 21 CODE BY STAKEHOLDERS
255
Navigability And
Outdoor seating
E.25
Create criteria to
Usability
warrants are not
enable outdoor dining;
clear on the code.
distinguish between
They fall under
public space such as
"open air retail" in
sidewalks and private
the code. It is not
space such as decks
clear that the
and roofs; review
definition applies to
Noise Ordinance (City
this type of warrant.
Code) for
enforcement.
256
Navigability And
Staff should create
Usability
an "outdoor
seating warrant"
with applicable
criteria.
257
Navigability And
There have been
Usability
outdoor seating
warrants for pool
decks, which should
not be applicable.
Also, outdoor
seating warrants for
an interior courtyard
(not visible from the
outside) shall not be
applicable.
258
Navigability And
One of the issues is
Usability
enforcement
because the people
do not know where
the "item" is
located within the
code and how it is
applicable.
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report
Appendices
Item #
Sub -topic
Comment
Modifications
Recom
Recommendations
mendat
ion#
259
NavigabiIityAnd
Outdoor seating
Usability
warrant should be in
the table that
provide information
regarding
commercial
establishment -
within Art.6.
260
Navigability And
Criteria shall be
Usability
created regarding
what the warrant is
intended to do
within ground floor.
For example, criteria
regarding what the
noise level is
intended to be, etc.
261
Navigability And
There is confusion
Usability
regarding sidewalk
cafes and outdoor
dining warrants. For
sidewalk cafes you
need a permit for
Public Works and
Resiliency and an
outdoor dining
warrant is required
as well by the
Zoning Department.
262
Navigability And
Art. 6 is intended to
Usability
be outdoor dining in
private property.
Where issues such
as, noise and
operation plan,
acoustics study is
regularly done.
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report Im
Appendices
Item #
Sub -topic
Comment
Modifications
Recom
mendat
ion#
Recommendations
263
Navigability And
A process with
E.3
Adjust Diagram #14
Usability
actual timeline shall
(Article 7) to include a
be provided. New
comprehensive
business shall be
process with estimated
provided with
dates to facilitate the
information of how
process for developers
long it would take to
and applicants, e.g.,
apply and process a
rezoning schedule;
permit. There are
pre -application to
deadlines and
hearing maximum one
timelines in Miami
year. In addition,
21 that are
provide a specific
permanently waived
flowchart with the
process and include a
courtesy notice at the
time of filing the
application to the
neighbors within 250
ft. radius and the
neighborhood
associations in the
area. As part of the
courtesy notice
provide the process
number. No additional
notice should be
required unless the
project is going
through a public
hearing process (e.g.
Exception, rezone, etc.)
that would involve a
Hearing Board notice.
264
Navigability And
Only warrants
Usability
provide a timeline
but not the other
permits.
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report Im
Appendices
Item #
Sub -topic
Comment
Modifications
Recom
Recommendations
mendat
ion#
265
NavigabiIityAnd
Neighbors and
Usability
business owners
shall obtain
information
regarding the
process. They shall
be able to know
what to expect. For
example, the
number of meetings
required and the
timeline.
266
Navigability And
Waivers should not
EA
Review Waivers to
Usability
require a notification
eliminate a notification
process when there
process when there is
is a deviation of the
a deviation of the
code if this does not
Code if this does not
affect the
affect the
neighborhood
neighborhood
267
Navigability And
An issue when
E.5
Specify a time frame
Usability
dealing with an
(30 calendar days) for
application request
the City to provide
raises when there is
responses and
an impasse. There is
comments from the
no due process
meeting between the
when trying to
Applicant and City that
resolve the issue/
follows the 2nd round
appeal a denial and
of comments.
there is no process
to seek
administrative
remedy.
268
Navigability And
A committee similar
Usability
the CRC
(administrative
board) shall be
created to seek
administrative relief
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report M1
Appendices
Item #
Sub -topic
Comment
Modifications
Recom
Recommendations
mendat
ion#
of these issues.
Currently, there is no
process.
269
Navigability And
Create a due process
Usability
for seeking relief of
zoning
interpretations
and/or planning
determinations.
o Planning
interpretations can
go to PZAB.
However, the
current process is
subject to the
discretion of the
Planning Director.
o Art.7 shall include
a path for the
administrative relief
of these issues.
270
Navigability And
Reviewing
Usability
covenants is a
lengthy process and
some departments
review these to add
comments such as
"review
unnecessary" .
271
Navigability And
There is conflicting
E.16
Modify and clarify
Usability
language in the
Article 7.1.2.8.2
code regarding
language to state
rezoning.
"may be approved
through an SAP
process."
272
Navigability And
Affordable housing
E.29
Hire an ombudsman
Usability
subjects are
for the City, who shall
scattered through
provide cross training
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report Im
Appendices
Item #
Sub -topic
Comment
Modifications
Recom
Recommendations
mendat
ion#
the code. There
among different
should be an article
departments
dedicated to
regarding Affordable
affordable housing.
Housing process
including the
273
Navigability And
Create an
Usability
Affordable-
covenants, and who
Attainable Housing
shall limit the
Section. There
requirements for the
should be a subject
execution to the
matter
minimum. E.g. Section
(ombudsman)
7.1.1: City shall create
expert to create
Ombudsman position
some consistency.
to be responsible for
designing efficiency in
274
Navigability And
Cross training
Usability
between the
processing all projects
departments. There
through zoning,
should be better
planning, building and
communication
public works process.
between
The ombudsman will
departments to
facilitate prompt
avoid back and
attention to
forward.
applications by city
staff, review ePlan
275
Navigability And
There should be
Usability
someone dedicated
workflows for
only to affordable
improvements in
housing projects.
service, and assist with
This person shall
cross -departmental
move the project
delays. In all
through the entire
circumstances the role
process.
of an Ombudsman
should be clearly
defined.
276
Navigability And
E.21
Conduct a
Usability
comprehensive review
of Miami 21 every two
years. Specify the
process with meetings
district by district. Hire
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report Im
Appendices
Item #
Sub -topic
Comment
Modifications
Recom
Recommendations
mendat
ion#
a consultant for these
activities.
4. A RESOLUTION OF THE MIAMI 21 AD HOC TASK FORCE COMMITTEE
("MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE") RECOMMENDING TO EVALUATE NOTICING AND QUASI-JUDICIAL
HEARINGS
277
Quasi -Judicial
Hearings
The rezoning cycle
shall be conducted 3
times a year instead
of twice a year.
278
Quasi -Judicial
Neighbors are not
E.7
Modernize and update
Hearings
receiving notices in
noticing process.
a timely matter, not
Suggested: eliminate
early enough. The
certified mail
code states that the
requirements; City
notices shall be
should do all mailings
delivered upon
like the Miami Dade
receiving the
County system; allow
application;
affidavits; and all
however, these are
electronic noticing for
being mailed when
neighborhood
the application is
associations and City
almost completed.
representatives (City
Code Chapter 62).
279
Quasi -Judicial
Notices shall be
E.8
Create and
Hearings
sent early in the
incorporate into Miami
process, these shall
21 criteria from
provide specific info
Chapter 23 to submit
rmation regarding
appeals for the
the
appellant to list the
project, and certified
reasons for the appeal.
mail shall not
Also, provide option to
be required but an
meet with CRC.
affidavit shall be
submitted certifying
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report Im
Appendices
Item #
Sub -topic
Comment
Modifications
Recom
Recommendations
mendat
ion#
that the mails have
been sent.
280
QUASI-JUDICIAL
Notices can
HEARINGS
be tracked
instead of using certi
fied mail.
281
QUASI-JUDICIAL
The HOA list
HEARINGS
provided by the NET
offices are not
updated.
282
QUASI-JUDICIAL
ZVL, Planning
HEARINGS
Determinations,
Zoning
Interpretations, and
Covenants require
more remedies such
as Interdisciplinary
meetings (CRC) to
solve make
decisions.
Interdisciplinary
meetings would
enhance the review
process for these
types of permits.
5. A RESOLUTION OF THE MIAMI 21 AD HOC TASK FORCE COMMITTEE ("MIAMI 21 TASK
FORCE") RECOMMENDING TO EVALUATE EDUCATION
283
Education
Walkability and
E.30
Coordinate school
transit in proximity
concurrency process
to schools should be
with Miami Dade
improved
County Public Schools
and City of Miami for
possibility to provide
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report MI
Appendices
Item #
Sub -topic
Comment
Modifications
Recom
mendat
ion#
Recommendations
transportation
between private
developments to
public schools that
their projects serve.
Also, City of Miami
shall coordinate with
Miami Dade County
public transportation
for the use of their
public trolley system
to assist with
transportation of
students within 2 miles
of the school.
284
Education
Transit in proximity
E.27
Amend Article 3 of
to schools should be
Miami 21 to include
improved
incentivizes for offsite
improvements to
pedestrian, bicycle,
other mobility
connections between
schools and the
subject property
within 1 or 2 miles of
the school; particularly
those schools that
connect to transit
stations. Provide for
impact fee credits to
Miami Dade County
impact fee, or Miami
21 Public Benefit
Credits (Section 3.14).
Coordination between
MDC Public Schools
and Public Works.
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report Im
Appendices
Item #
Sub -topic
Comment
Modifications
Recom
Recommendations
mendat
ion#
Include in SAP
requirements.
285
Education
Walkability in
As above
proximity to schools
should be improved
286
Education
Open space
E.31
Coordinate with
provision and
MDCPS Public Schools
maintenance needs
the use of public space
improving across
owned by MDCPS for
the City
public access and
recreational use.
287
Education
Open space
E.32
Acquire additional
provision and
land to be dedicated
maintenance needs
towards public open
improving across
space especially in
the City
those neighborhoods
that lack it.
288
Open space
Open space
E.33
Create a program to
provision and
clean vacant (private)
maintenance needs
lots and turn them into
improving across
low-cost temporary
the City
parks as a
collaboration between
Parks, Code
Enforcement, and a
nonprofit
organization.
289
Open space
A list should be
E.26
Work with Parks
created regarding
department to create a
overall needs of the
priority list of park
neighborhoods,
improvements, open
whether is parks,
spaces and spaces
open space, etc. this
located under the
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report Im
Appendices
Item #
Sub -topic
Comment
Modifications
Recom
mendat
ion#
Recommendations
list shall be provided
highways that can be
to developers and
improved as part of
have them work
developments nearby
towards improving
and count these
or providing these.
improvements
towards public
benefits, with
assistance of an
Ombudsman (Section
5.3.6). In all
circumstances the role
of an Ombudsman
should be clearly
defined.
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report M1
Appendices
F. ASSESSMENT
1 .A RESOLUTION OF THE MIAMI 21 AD HOC TASK FORCE COMMITTEE
("MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE") RECOMMENDING APPROVAL TO INCORPORATE EFFECTS OF
TRANSPORTATION RECOMMENDATIONS INTO THE MIAMI 21 AD HOC TASK FORCE REPORT
Item
Sub -topic
Comment
Modifications
Recom
Recommendations
#
mendat
ion#
290
Mixed -Use and
Yes, but here are
FA
Provide incentives to
Transitional Zones
neighborhoods that
build smaller projects
have "suffered"
within the
since the corridors
neighborhood
are not mixed use.
context, to revitalize
Redevelopment
existing structures,
through entitlement
complete
process is a solution
neighborhoods, and
for this issue
eliminate empty lots
within them with
291
Mixed -Use and
No, M21 has not
Transitional Zones
accomplished it.
exception of NRDs,
M21 does not
SAPS, and large-scale
promote mixed -uses
projects. Such as 50%
but it creates
FAR increase, setback
limitations.
and lot coverage relief,
o Mixed -use is
and other similar
limited to areas near
Wynwood Norte
Metrorail stations.
standards.
o Outside of NRDs,
SAPS, and specialty
districts M21 is not
promoting mixed
use citywide.
292
Mixed -Use and
Incentives should be
Transitional Zones
provided in T3, T4,
and T5 to encourage
development of
vacant lots.
o This would take
away the
importance of
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report Im
Appendices
Item
Sub -topic
Comment
Modifications
Recom
Recommendations
#
mendat
ion#
intensity and height
and encourage
proper infill.
Incentives + real and
tangible benefits
292
Mixed -Use and
Eliminate "Rs" and
Transitional Zones
L' s" on T4 and T5.
293
Mixed -Use and
Planning can create
Transitional Zones
a list of exceptions
for certain "Rs"
and "Ls" . There
are certain lots that
might fit a micro -
unit without parking.
Provide a list of
options of uses that
can be achieved in
those lots (e. g.
construction of a
microunit, small
shop, Cafecito shop,
office, etc.)
294
Mixed -Use and
It is difficult for small
Transitional Zones
developers to
understand the code
since the zoning
changes from one
block to another.
The more
standardized the
code is, the better it
is for small/ large
developers and
businessowners.
2. A RESOLUTION OF THE MIAMI 21 AD HOC TASK FORCE COMMITTE ("MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE" )
RECOMENDING TO EVALUATE THE INTERACTION WITH MIAMI COMPREHENSIVE NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report Im
Appendices
Item
Sub -topic
Comment
Modifications
Recom
Recommendations
#
mendat
ion#
295
Interaction with MCNP
There are
F.5
Verify that Miami 21 is
contradictory
consistent with the
arguments between
Miami Dade Long
M21 and major
Range Transportation
transportation lines
Plan and implement
regarding the
the needed policies in
concept of TOD and
the zoning code.
when an area can
become a TOD?
o The main
definition states that
train/metro stations
are build in areas
with higher density.
o The code states
that first, an area
must be a TOD to
then build stations.
296
Interaction with MCNP
Recommendations
required from the
planning
department
regarding
developing/promoti
ng TODs within the
city.
297
Interaction with MCNP
Some setback
F.6
Revisit the Established
requirements are
Setback requirements
unnecessary, and
and update them into
these force
urbanistic conditions
dimensions in the
and active first floor
design of buildings.
uses, with the metrics
These setbacks
provided by the
create higher
Planning Department.
F.1
Allow adjustments to
podiums for the
parking lots.
the first layer for
properties fronting a
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report M1
Appendices
Item
#
Sub -topic
Comment
Modifications
Recom
mendat
ion#
Recommendations
70 ft ROW or larger
from 10 ft to 5 ft.
F.2
Make Lot Coverage in
T6-48 and above,
100% instead of 90%
with the inclusion of
additional common
public and private
open spaces.
3. A RESOLUTION OF THE MIAMI 21 AD HOC TASK FORCE COMMITTE ("MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE" )
RECOMENDING TO EVALUATE THE MIAMI 21 ATLAS REFLECTING GOVT.OWNED PROPERTIES
298
Govt. Owned
State and federal
F.7
Prioritize review,
Properties
institutions are not
enforcement and
in compliance with
updating of
Miami 21.
intergovernmental
agreements.
F.3
Remove Section
3.15.2.b from Miami
21.
4. A RESOLUTION OF THE MIAMI 21 AD HOC TASK FORCE COMMITTE ("MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE" )
RECOMENDING TO IDENTIFY THE NUMBER OF APPROVED DEVELOPMENTS SINCE MIAMI 21 HAS BEEN
IN EFFECT
29
Approved
City Staff has been
Developments
tasked to provide
this information.
MIAMI 21 TASK FORCE Recommendations Report Im