HomeMy WebLinkAboutSubmittal-Elvis Cruz-Analysis3.9.h.6: A Pedestrian Passage, requiring a minimum twenty (10) foot wide perNOTICE
reserved between Buildings.
ilds suPMal rrte°s b M untOaka Iq a W Oif Marvg
ca0arca xiV Ornelnn sH °rth t.0u Ciryol
w"a. cm: ma a°a+rana aasu°-mavnq o°ar.w
Analysis: The location of Pedestrian Passages and Paseos is illustrated in Con
"A1.9". Furthermore, the design for Pedestrian Passages and Paseos
within the Concept Book in sheets "A2.8" and "A2.9". This amendment
any Pedestrian Passage or Paseo regulations. •
Findings: Consistent.
3.9.h.7: A preservation plan acceptable to the Historic and Environmental Preservation Board for
any historic resources in the area of the Special Area Plan.
Analysis:
Findings:
The SAP shall comply with all requirements of Chapter 23 of the City of Miami Code of
Ordinances.
Conditionally consistent. Refer to Condition #8.
N
U a
Q
a o
�c
3.9.h.8:
Area Design Guidelines.
as+
0
N
a
U
�;
o
Analysis:
The Applicant has submitted an amended Regulating Plan and Concept Book for the
-a
E
N
proposed amendment, attached hereto as Attachment "A" and Attachment "B".
a)
41
N
N
Findings:
Consistent
EL
0
p
C:
cn
L
0
0
3.9.h.9:
A parking management program that enables shared parking among public and private
U
0)
L
Uses.
Analysis: The MDD SAP Concept Book Sheet "A2.2 — Parking Management Program" identifies
both private and public parking options.
Findings: Consistent.
3.9.h.10: Flexible allocation of development capacity and Height, excluding Density on individual
sites within the Special Area Plan, shall be allowed so long as the capacity or Height
distribution does not result in development that is out of Scale or character with the
surrounding area, and provides for appropriate transitions.
Analysis: The proposed amendment proposes changing the development standards for T6
properties; allowing flexible transfer of density and intensity from site to site, while
maintaining the same height and FLR maximums currently enabled through the city's
public benefit program.
Findings: Consistent.
The following is a review of the request pursuant to the criteria under Article 7 and Section 7.1.2.8.f. of
Miami 21. The Background section of this report is hereby incorporated into the analysis and its
corresponding criteria by reference:
Criteria 9: 7.1.2.8.f.1(a): "The relationship of the proposed amendment to the goals, objectives
and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, with appropriate consideration as to
whether the proposed change will further the goals, objectives and policies of the
1 `4 s,, ,m-++a 1 _ fl V ti s 1. u z - Ari"5 1 s Page 10 of 13
F
�7Z�